The URL can be used to link to this page

PLN20090054.pdff6C. 1890 Date: CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Letter of Transmittal February 16, 2010 To: Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: PLN-2009-54 Transmitting Administrative Design Review Findings, Conclusions, and Decision For Your Information: X As you requested: For your file: Comment: Note attachments: X Cc: See attached list Sincerely, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION To: Yutian Yao From: "- Mike Clugston, AICP Planner Date: February 11, 2010 File: PLN-2009-0054 I. INTRODUCTION A. Application 1. Applicant: Yutian Yao. 2. Site Location: 18430 Olympic View Drive (see inset). 3. Request: A Conditional Use Permit to allow the removal of several trees in a steep slope area (Attachments 1 & 2). 4. Review Process: An Administrative Conditional Use Permit is a Type II permit. Following a public comment period, the Director makes an administrative decision. P• Major Issues: �\\IkZr MW a. Compliance with Edmonds City of Edmonds Zoning Map, November 18, 2008 Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 18.45 - Land Clearing and Tree Cutting. b. Compliance with ECDC Section 20.01 — Types of Development Project Permit Applications. c. Compliance with ECDC Sections 23.40, 23.80 and 23.90 - Environmentally Critical Areas — General Provisions, Geologically Hazardous Areas, and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 2 of 8 B. Description of Proposal The applicant proposes to remove ten trees. Several of the trees are immediately adjacent to the existing house, while the remainder are scattered throughout the eastern portion of the site. (Attachment 2). The applicant also indicated that he had been contacted by the Snohomish PUD who wanted to do some maintenance work in the vicinity of the utility lines along Olympic View Drive. Permission was given by the landowner to perform the work (Attachment 3). Rather than simply trimming the vegetation to provide clearance for the lines, PUD crews removed several trees and left stumps in two clusters near Olympic View Drive. As will be discussed later in this report, the requirements of the critical areas code apply not only to homeowners but to public utilities as well. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Development, Neighboring Development and Zoning 1. Facts: a. The site is approximately 11,300 square feet and zoned Single - Family Residential (RS-12). Like the subject lot, the surrounding area is similarly zoned and developed with single family residences (see inset). b. The eastern half of the parcel slopes uphill from west to east toward Olympic View Drive at grades in excess of 40%. The western half of the site is fully developed with a house and driveway. The eastern portion of the site is relatively intact remnant forest with vegetation consisting of a number of larger trees and forest groundcover. Residential landscaping is not present in this area although there is a gravel parking pad on the site near Olympic View Drive. Hutt Park, an identified bald eagle nesting site, is located approximately 800' east of the subject site. Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 3 of 8 B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. ECDC Section 18.45 (Land Clearing and Tree Cutting) a. Facts: 1) ECDC Section 18.45.030 exempts clearing op an improved single-family lot, except for that portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent. It also exempts installation and maintenance of public utilities, after approval of the route by the planning division manager or his or her designee, except in parks or environmentally sensitive areas. 2) The subject parcel has slopes in excess of 40%, which was confirmed through the submission of a critical areas checklist (CRA-2005-0043). 3) ECDC 18.45.050.13 states that "trees shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible." b. Conclusions: 1) A permit is required for the work in question since the activity will occur on slopes in excess of 25%. 2. ECDC Sections 23.40, 23.80 and 23.90 (Environmentally Critical Areas) a. Facts: 1) As identified in CRA-2005-0043, the subject parcel contains slopes of greater than 40%, which meets the definition of a landslide hazard area according to ECDC 23.80. Generally, vegetation in such critical areas is to be retained. Select vegetation may be removed per ECDC 23.40.220.C.7, and trees may be removed if they are hazardous, pose a threat to public safety, or pose an imminent risk of damage to private property. 2) The subject location is located within approximately 800' of Hutt Park, an identified bald eagle nesting site. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) provided guidance for the proposed project since it is within a bald eagle management area (Attachment 4). Specifically, "[r]etain all known perch trees and all conifers >24 inches diameter at breast height (dbh). Retain all cottonwoods > 20 inches diameter at breast height (dbh). Also retain > 50% of pre -clearing and pre -construction conifer stand with diameter distributions reprehensive of the original stand (>6 feet tall)." Also, "[w]indowing and low limbing of trees in acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed." 3) The arborist's report and tree hazard evaluation forms describe the health and impacts of the subject trees (Attachment 5): a) Tree #1 — 37" Douglas fir, 95' tall, has been wind topped but basically healthy, slight impact to pavers near parking area on eastern portion of the site (Attachment 6) b) Tree #2 — 42" Western red cedar, 75' tall, healthy but root system impacting underground utilities on the site (Attachment 7) c) Tree #3 — 44" Western red cedar, 70' tall, healthy but very close to house and root system impacts foundation (Attachment 8) Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 4 of 8 d) Tree #4 — 12" Hemlock, 35' tall, healthy but multiple trunks and very close to house (Attachment 9) e) Tree #5 — 8" Hemlock, 25' tall, healthy with no impact to site (Attachment 7) f) Trees #6 — 2, 8" Western dogwoods, 25' tall, trees have failed and are leaning on other trees (Attachment 7) g) Trees #7 — 3 Alder (4", 8" and 10"), 15'-25' tall, healthy with no impact to site (Attachment 10) 4) The applicant submitted a geotechnical report which describes the stability of the slope where the trees are located and indicates that removal of trees using best management practices would not negatively impact the stability of the slope (Attachment 11). It is recommended that the stumps are left in place to stabilize the slope but any cuttings be removed from the slope. 5) Tree removal work performed by PUD must also comply with the critical areas code (Attachments 12 and 13). While ECDC 18.45.030.E, provides a permit exemption for utility installation and maintenance, this does not extend to work done in parks or environmentally sensitive areas. This is further codified in ECDC 23.40.230.C.2 which discusses critical area exemptions: Operation, Maintenance, or Repair. Operation, maintenance, or repair of existing structures, infrastructure improvements, utilities, public or private roads, dikes, levees, or drainage systems that do not require construction permits, if the activity does not further alter or increase the impact to, or encroach further within, the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or property as a result of the proposed operation, maintenance, or repair. As discussed previously, the subject site is an environmentally critical area due to steep slopes. The tree removal by PUD did increase the impact to the critical area as it occurred at the top of the steep slope adjacent to Olympic View Drive and, as the photographs indicate, the cuttings were left on the slope. 6) If trees are to be removed from critical areas, ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b.iv states: The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of two replacement trees for each tree removed (two to one) within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan. Replacement trees may be planted at a different, nearby location if it can be determined that planting in the same location would create a new hazard or potentially damage the critical area. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a minimum of one inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from the top of the root ball. b. Conclusions: 1) Based on the documentation provided, Trees 2, 3, 4 and 6 are either hazardous or threatening private property and are therefore candidates for removal. However, Trees 2 and 3 exceed the WFWD threshold for retention since the subject site is located within a bald eagle management area. The applicant will have to obtain Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 5 of 8 specific approval from WFWD to remove Trees 2 and 3 even though these trees meet the criteria for removal according to City code. 2) Trees 1, 5 and 7 do not meet the criteria for removal found in ECDC 23.40.220.C.7 and therefore must remain. These trees should be appropriately maintained using best arboricultural management practices to ensure their continued health. 3) The stumps should remain in order to provide stability on the slope. 4) Tree removal and maintenance like that performed by PUD is not exempt from critical areas requirements. The removal of two clumps of trees by PUD in this case must be mitigated. 5) Trees removed from critical areas must be replaced per ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b.iv. C. Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Compliance 1. Facts: a. The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and those in the immediate vicinity as "Single Family — Resource". b. The Comprehensive Plan has the following stated goals and policies for Residential Development and development within areas of sensitive soils and topography which apply to this project: Soils and Topography C. Goal. Development on steep slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features of the site, in accordance with the following policies: C. 3. Erosion Control. C.3.b. Natural vegetation should be preserved wherever possible to reduce erosion and stabilize slopes, particularly on the downhill property line. C.3.c. Slopes should be stabilized with deep rooted vegetation and mulch, or other materials to prevent erosion and siltation of drainage ways. Vegetation and Wildlife B. Goal. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation are preserved, in accordance with the following policies: B.2. The removal of trees should be minimized particularly when they are located on steep slopes or hazardous soils. Subdivision layouts, buildings and roads should be designed so that existing trees are preserved. B.3. Trees that are diseased, damaged, or unstable should be removed. B.4. Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas should be preserved. 2. Conclusion: a. The proposed conditions ensure the permit is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 6 of 8 D. Technical Committee The proposal has been evaluated by the Engineering Division as well as the Public Works and Fire Departments. The Engineering Division submitted comments that are included as Attachment 14. The applicant has indicated that the tree removal would take place from private property but a right-of-way construction permit would be required to use any portion of the City right-of-way. E. Public Comment The City received four comments regarding the application (Attachments 15-18). In each case, the commenters questioned the need to remove trees which appear to be otherwise healthy. Response: While the code and Comprehensive Plan both indicate the City's intent to retain trees, trees that are hazardous or pose a threat to private or public property may be cut. In this case, while Trees 2, 3 and 4 are all reasonably healthy, they are very close to the applicant's house and have been found to impact the house's foundation and underground utility lines. In another location, these trees would not be candidates for removal. However, these three trees already negatively impact the applicant's house and utilities and threaten to cause more damage in the future. If trimming and maintenance would resolve the problem, that would be the recommended course of action. However, the tree roots are causing the problem and root trimming would only lead to a weakened, and therefore, more hazardous tree. As a result, Trees 2, 3 and 4 are candidates for removal. The two trees identified as #6 have failed and can therefore be removed. In each case, mitigation is required for all trees that are removed. Mr. Goodman (Attachment 17) also had comments regarding the possible negative impact of cutting on a stormwater drain on the site and about where the notice was posted on the site. Response: With respect to notice, ECDC 20.03.002.A states that notice must be posted 5 feet inside the street property line at the midpoint of the street frontage. In this case, given the slope of the site, the applicant was directed to post the notice sign slightly down the access road to the parcel since it was felt it would be more stable and less likely to be removed. Regarding the removal of the subject trees and an impact to stormwater facilities on the site, the City does not currently maintain any stormwater facilities on the subject parcel. All stormwater lines currently run down Olympic View Drive in that area (Attachment 19). There is an old storm crossing that goes under Olympic View Drive but that has not been maintained by the City since the stormwater lines in the area were redone in the 1980s. III. DECISION Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report, the application for a Conditional Use Permit for tree cutting at 18430 Olympic View Drive is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tree #4 (12" Hemlock) may be removed. The two dogwood trees identified as Tree #6 may also be removed. In each case, stumps shall remain in order to maintain slope stability. Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 7 of 8 2. Trees #1, #5 and #7 do not meet the criteria for removal found in ECDC 23.40.220.C.7 and therefore must remain. These trees should be appropriately maintained using best arboricultural management practices to ensure their continued health. The Applicant shall comply fully with the October 28, 2009 Bald Eagle Management Plan (BEMP) issued by the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW). The Director notes that, in addition to other requirements, the October 28, 2009 BEMP requires retention of all known perch trees and all conifers greater than 24 inches diameter at breast height. This statement appears to prohibit the clearing or removal of the two trees located in the eastern area of the project site (Tree 42 and Tree #3). Prior to clearing or removal of said trees, the Applicant shall provide the City with written documentation demonstrating WDFW's specific approval of such clearing or removal. Such documentation may take the form of a letter from WDFW, a revised or amended BEMP, or other writing clearly expressing WDFW's approval. 4. To mitigate for the loss of the five trees referenced in Conditions # 1 and #2 as well as the two tree clusters removed by PUD, the applicant must submit a restoration plan developed by a certified arborist or landscape architect that meets the requirements of ECDC 18.45 and 23.40. The restoration plan must include a cost estimate to determine a performance bond amount and a planting schedule that includes specific species, sizes and locations for the proposed replantings prepared according to ECDC 20.13.010 and 20.13.015. The restoration plan materials shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to any work being done at the site. 5. The following erosion control practices shall be implemented: a. All removal and planting must be done by hand using hand tools. b. Excess soil exposed during replanting shall be removed from the site. c. Applicable best management practices found in ECDC 18.30 shall be employed. 6. All cuttings must be removed from the site, including those pieces cut by PUD. 7. After the plantings are installed as indicated on the approved restoration plan, the Applicant must contact the Planning Division to schedule an installation inspection. If the inspection determines the landscaping to be in compliance with the approved restoration plan, the performance bond will be released. A maintenance bond will be retained at an amount of 15% of the performance bond. 8. Two years from the date of final installation of the new vegetation, the Applicant must contact the Planning Division to schedule a final site inspection to ensure compliance with the approved restoration plan. If the inspection determines the landscaping to be in compliance with the approved plan, the maintenance bond will be released. 9. A separate right-of-way construction permit shall be obtained from the City prior to any sidewalk or street closures, should closure become necessary. 10. No fence or retaining wall may be constructed at the site within critical areas without an approved building permit. Yao Tree Cutting File No. PLN-2009-0054 Page 8 of 8 IV. APPEAL A party of record may submit a written appeal of a Type II decision within 14 days of the date of issuance of the decision. The appeal will be heard at an open record public hearing before the Hearing Examiner according to the requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.06 and Section 20.07.004. V. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 18.45.045.C. states "Any permit granted under the provisions of this section shall expire one year from the date of issuance. No work may commence on the permit until the appeal time limit has expired. Upon receipt of a written request, a permit may be extended for six months." VI. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Applicant's statement and supporting documentation, dated November 3, 2009 3. Snohomish PUD tree removal/trimming report, dated September 9, 2009 4. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Snohomish County Bald Eagle Management Plan, dated October 28, 2009 5. Arborist report and tree hazard evaluation forms, received December 8, 2009 6. Photo of tree # 1 7. Photo of trees #2, #5 and #6 8. Photo of tree #3 9. Photo of tree #4 10. Photo of trees #7 11. Geotechnical report from Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc., dated November 10, 2009 12. Photo of trees near Olympic View Drive (north) 13. Photo of trees near Olympic View Drive (south) 14. Engineering Division comment letter, dated December 21, 2009 15. Comment letter from Nathaniel Brown, dated December 18, 2009 16. Comment letter from Howard Bobry, dated December 28, 2009 17. Comment letter from John Goodman, dated January 3, 2010 18. Comment letter from Elizabeth Poll, dated January 3, 2010 19. Stormwater utility map in the subject area along Olympic View Drive 20. Noticing materials VII. PARTIES OF RECORD Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Nathaniel Brown 18529 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Planning Division Howard Bobry John Goodman Elizabeth Poll 18416 Olympic View Drive 18420 Olympic View Drive 18401 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 city of edmonds land use application RECEIVE[ Nov 12'L: DEVELOPMENT SERVICi. - COUNTER ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 / � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # PLI 200� 00 ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE I Z REC'D BY ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION 5�y ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 8 S-01O RECEIPT# ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE C�TAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION �� ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) /, , / ,� /, p PROPERTY OWNER L I/�`�-' IV AQ I- YN �� '1/ Yn" PHONE # ADDRESS`/'(p�� 64w,C V/P J)t-. / WA p / E-MAIL Ja4 / of (I t /® /� �Yidii /, C d t" FAX # 7 'J^ ' f92 - 0 9F, TAx ACCOUNT # 00 - f1 S p oo 2 cr> 20 3 SEC. TWP. RNG. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) APPLICANT \l �l /ate P-y H-//O''NE # T�-�o �L -2 X ADDRESS `h%L,, 0��,C Vim/ Dt, nvPf� WA Voo E-MAIL y"?,o /Intl 0-01t 0 / �co -'1 FAX # 4Zu —Sf 2- - W2//, p CONTACT PERSON/AGENT A-r1A /V / 4-U PHONE # �p�' JO 2 -Jl > ADDRESS `�//JS 4� d !;/�iC Vi PAC) E-MAIL yA-O Y,, f/a-It/V✓/, t o ^I FAx # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE � �/ I IA- 2 Property Owner's Authorization I, , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE This application form was revised on 8/10/09. Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. L:\LIBRARYTLANNING\Forms & Handouts\Public Handouts\Land Use Application.doc Statement of proposal regarding tree removal RECEIVED NOV 12 2009 November 3, 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Home owner: Lilin Wu & Yutian Yao Home address: 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA98020 Trees to be removed: The tree on northeast corner of the house is only 5"-6" from the building. The roots have cracked the concrete foundation. (See attached `First Choice Home Inspection page 5') The tree on north side of the property near the parking spot, the roots have damaged the main water pipeline coming into the house between the meter and house. (See attached `First Choice Home Inspection page 13') The tree on northwest corner of the house and the tree on north side of the house near by deck are too close to building. The home owner will hire a licensed tree company (Washington Tree Experts) to remove the three big trees (2 Cedar, 1 Doug Fir) and the home owner will remove the Hemlock tree (DBH 12", 35'high) themselves, which is located on the northeast corner of the house. (See attached plot plan) The job is scheduled on November 12 and 13, 2009 The home owner plans to build two retaining wall between the house and the parking spot and plant 10-15 smaller trees on east side near the property line sometime in the next year. (See attached plot plan) ta -ent u ,:J-: uj 41 UL. IN - IN u i uj uj '161 o 1-Z IQJ VN C;l 0 "n ......... .... . 10 rim uj .j U. uj uj Record 05142009 - Wu, Lilin 18430 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 Hazard or Wood Destroying Condition EXTERIOR. Exposed Foundation On the NE comer and a the mid point of the north wall there are structurally concerning cracks in the foundation (pic ,2). These r' cracks may be due to the tree located near this side of the foundation. Further evaluation and corrections by a structural ` r engineer are needed. The crack on the NE comer is offset indicating significant movement. t- On the interior side of the NE comer there are a couple of cracks in the cement floor (pic 3,4). One of the cracks is in rose proximity to the large crack on the exterior and the other is across the room. Further investigation and corrections needed. Summary: Page 5 of 16 First Choice Home Inspection Record 05142009 - Wu, Lilin 18430 Olympic view Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 Service or''Repair Required. 'PLUMBING Water Source The main water supply pipe between the meter and the house is ruptured and needs to be repaired by a licensed plumber (pic 1). Water is bubbling up from the ground at the end of the pavers neat the front porch. The entire plumbing system should be evaluated by a licensed plumber. This is recommended due to the number of fixtures that not installed and the suspected remodel that may not have been permitted or inspected. - -- - ----- -�w -Monitor or. improve -_- --- ---------� ;DEFINITIONS J Monitor or Improve The item will require monitoring and improvement anytime in the next five years Summary: Page 13 of 16 First Choice Home Inspection .why:; X ,; Permit No.: �U Tree- Removdl / Trimming Permit 1615 Rev.05/07 Permission is hereby granted to the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, its successors and/or assigns to: )4111�MV .......................... Remove as marked, stumps left to*be no higher -than six (6) inches from ground, if possible. ❑ ST ............................. Side trim (Limbs may be trimmed flush with the trunk). ❑ RTS Brush ................. Remove to Specs all Brush & Tree Brush (includes Vine -Maple, Hazelnut, Salal, Salmonberry, etc.). ❑ RTS Tree Brush .......... Remove to Specs all Tree Brush less than 5" in diameter at any height; free Brush consists of BLM (Big Leaf Maple); ALD (Alder); CAS (Cascara); WIL (Willow); COT (Cottonwood); HEM (Hemlock); CHY (Wild Cherry); and LOC (Locust). TTS ...........I ................ Trim for 12' of clearance from primary conductor, unless otherwise specified. ❑ DL .............. ............... Drop and Leave; Trees cut down, wood and branches left for customer cleanup. ❑ Top and Shape .......... Top and Shape: Cut 2' below phone/communication/cable, unless otherwise specified.- XNOBW ....................... Notify Owner Before Work and further to cut and remove underbrush that might endanger or interfere with the maintenance or operation of the PUD's electrical facilities that are upon or adjacent to property of the undersigned, at the following location: Fielding notes: cENet) Total Tree Removals over five (5) inches DBH: It is understood that the work shall be done with care, at no expense to me, and the trimmings removed by said Public Utility District. It is41so understood that all wood larger than five inches (5") in diameter will be left on site in four -foot (4') lengths for my use unless otherwise stated.. Owner Signature: XT-74,4 Owner Name: L l (� ki w L- Address: 1 c� �13 o C) t y w, D I Cy( I°. w tv City/State/Zip: AGE VVl 0 V1d. Phone (Home): (�L5 ) 5-10) Phone (Work): ( ) Date: ' Z I W.O. / Task No.: Notifier Name: -�-DS k P,-- V-,LZ Notifier Phone: 4?, 5- —16-3 5U 5LP If you have any questions regarding the tree -trim work, please contact me at the number listed above or call 425-783- 5594. Please complete, sign and date. Return the white copy in the enclosed envelope. Please complete, sign and date. Retain canary copy for your records. Return white copy in enclosed self-addressed, postage -paid envelope. ,fl,ttacr!merit 3 RECEIVED srerf. NOV 12 2009 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICE; yy� aoy�. COUNTER t�s WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SNOHOMISH COUNTY BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN Short Plan for Clearing, Grading, Remodeling, and Single Home Construction Not for Forest Practice Applications, Subdivisions, Short Plats, or Conversions RCW 77.12.655, WAC 232-12-292 TERRITORY —Huff Park 517 _2 Occurrence # Nest # ACTIVITY Remove 4 trees that are damaging property CONDITIONS: The following conditions apply to the entire parcel or lot. 0 CONDITION 1: This lot is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Any construction or vegetation removal on this lot requires a site -specific Bald Eagle Management Plan. The landowner must contact and consult with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) prior to any clearing or construction. Contact the WDFW at (425) 379-2301. �+ CONDITION 2: This lot occurs > 400 feet from a bald eagle nest but within a bald eagle management area. Retain all known perch trees and all conifers >24 inches diameter at breast height (d.b.h). Retain all cottonwoods >20 inches diameter at breast height (d.b.h). Also retain >50% of pre -clearing or pre -construction conifer stand with diameter distributions representative of the original stand (>6 feet tall). Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above condition(s) placed on Parcel ��21?�with actual street address of 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98020 . If the conditions set forth above are acceptable, please sign below and this will serve as your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. ' e 28 October 2009 District Wildlife Biologist Signature (Date) Regional Wildlife Biologist Send Copy To: Ruth Milner La Conner, WA 98257 Fag: 360-466-0515 mot/ Landowner Signature (Date) Yyz1AAJ A Landowner Name (Print) Address f - 4(2S'—S$21 8688 Phone number tiIC� C`1Ctl`; t4 L.N-2 C�a-G0,:-:.. RLMCounty/City Short Plan: Oct 25, 2009 Dec 08 09 08:31a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.1 October 30, 2009 Client: Location: RE: .removal. Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way #123 Edmonds, WA 98020 206-362-3380 staff washin tontreeex erts.com Mr. and Mrs. Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS 121 Fltth Ave. No. Edmonds, Washlnon 98020 RECEIVE[) DEC 0 8 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Tree identification and hazard evaluation to satisfy permit requirements for Tree 1: Doug Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) DBH = 37" approx height = 95' Observations: (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 3 and 4) -tree has been wind topped . -there is restricted root zone due to paving and grade -tree is stand alone in prevailing wind Tree 2: Westem Red Cedar (Thuja piicata) DBH = 42" approx height = 75' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 5 and 6) Tree 3: Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) DBH = 44" approx height = 70' Observations: (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 7 and 8) -tree is 6" to 12" away from house -there is root interference with the foundation of the home -root pruning is not recommended as it can compromise the structural integrity of the tree Tree 4: Hemlock (Tsuga heterophyVa) DBH = 12" approx height = 35' Observations: -tree is too close to house -tree has multiple co -dominant thinks increasing risk of failure LI'll-2 .09-G051. Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.2 Tree 5: Hemlock DBH = 8" approx height = 25' Tree 6: Western Dogwood (Corpus nutalii) DBH = 2 trunks @ 8" each approx height = 20' Observations: -one trunk has fallen into a neighboring tree -tree has significant rot at the base and should be removed Trees 7: Group of Alder (Alms rubra) DBH =10", 8", and 4" approx height=15-25' Prepared by Jennifer Wells Certified Consulting Arborist PINT #6209A RECEIVE DEC 06 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Waiver of Liability This information represents the tree health assessment at this point in time. My findings do Dot guarantee future safety nor ere they predictions of future events. Information coatained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. The inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible item without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. 2 Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p,3 'U ®4EE ASSESSMENT FGAM All sectioru of this form rust be fully celr inieted by a aualifted orofesRECEIVE (A hazard tree musthave a targetwithinf .5x ;he height of the trey.} Site/Address: ��'1 �� (y _Y Ie W VY DEC 08 2009 Map/!_ocatior,: t �,- I t DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Owner: public private^ unknown other COUNTER Date, 1 30- Q Name of Tree Assessor. 21'� rl t T L P �1 S ISA* N W cQZo'II Ft Other Professional Certificates and Qualifications: TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree a 4 Species_Ai_gd �Si�tA vYYb n ✓5 I i _ _ _ DSH: �� 41 of Iyunks- 1 "eight- spread, c� r Form. Dgenereuy symmetric minor asyrrvneay ❑stump sprout []stag -headed Crown Clasx Ygnm.v ant ❑ co -dominant ❑ intern:ed?ate 3 suppressed Uve crown ratio- MA Agectass: ❑young ❑semi -mature )<maRue ❑over-rcu-turplsenescent Pruning History: ❑crown cleaned ❑ excessively thinned 0to.0PedKProvvn raise rJeollarded ❑crown reduced GmPnrsh cuts l]cabled/praced O none O mpltip:e pruning events A F. prrax. dates: Special Value: Ospecimen Oheritage/h storic i]vn7dG a ❑unusual ❑street tree ❑screen ps iads stdgenous Qprotected by got agency TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover -Apr rr 1 ❑chroniet]necrgticicarmies-/ N CW0wIh obstructions Foliage Density: 2:�&prmai []sparse teal S=-.4 or naa ❑small ©stakes pwire/ties Dsigns Cicaoles Annual shoot gmwlh:pexcellen1XAv;1ge ❑poor Twig Dietraek? Y N O curtr:pavenent ❑guards Woundwood development:oexcenerrt,,�d-Iverage 0poor c1nons yIther Vigor ctes= 0excellent �Verago C far 0poor t Major pesWidisease s: N SITE CONDITIONS " Site Landscape typ. Lrestdence O coirJnerctai C,,rt t !trial !?pars; G-open space 0 natu, si t7 tcoodlandffcrest Landscape type [� parkway O raised bed LI mimirler j] mcunnd p iavn ❑!herb border O Whid break trrigaGon: `�`jmpne ❑ adequate p Incdequa'm ❑ excessire ❑ trunk vented Hecent sate disturbance? y 0 O construction 0soildsturbarcaL7 Srade change O tine clearing p site dearinp % driplina paved: 095 10-25 25'0°5 50-7500 75-10BOA Pavement lifted? (DN `sr. dnpune wrfiu soil• ` Qr 259E 25-50 u 50-75 35 75-tOd% dripane grade lowerert 016 0-25 25-50% 5 0-75% 7&•1003u Soil problems: ❑ drainage 03mv ❑ compacted Gdroughty ❑sa ine pal ❑craY O expansive '21ine ❑ acidic rm smau! volume ❑disease center Qhstory of fall -- --� _? O aspect obstructions.❑ tights CI signaae ❑ line -of sfta II v ew 0 overhead lines ❑ unde ground uCuitfeS ❑traffic Expo"m to wind: ❑ single tree D below �./ Gadia-cent veg. EL_ t3 abate Cyl7CpYrecerdly ex rased /2l wind --a cane edge Prevailing wind direction: �_ /�\ canopyg C area Frone ±n windthraw Occurrence of s:^.owitce storms ❑ never )K4,0dom Q regu'ariy TARGET Use Under7ree: 1'9P-ikFr9 [ I—ddrg L'. ua^YtC ' f> 's r:,n �r+xra.-ton ulanG;c Ohatiscapa OsrMilt Can target be moved? y N Q Can use be nestricterl7 Y t0r-5 OrJlityi7rta; uccupa=y: Uocrasib-aWuse ❑intemti anttse t✓frequ"use Xonstantuse z Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.4 RECEIVE 1 DEC 0 8 2009 TREE DEFECTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - OUNTER ROOT DEFEG7S: suspect root rot: Y ``M''ushrown/conktbrackef pfeser* Y (..DY 1& FjrPomd roatc Oca,nro tlarate 1]bw Undermimed: ❑&were 4 oW-=e Otow Rootprunad Root area affected: 21. Buttresswormded:Q N Wgen: Realrictedrootarea; f7severe �InodPrare Qlea Petertixtfor root tai;arm severe torlaate atow LEAN: deft. from, vertical CnaluraT ❑unyol rdl ❑ sett-ccaec*.ed Sa heaving: Y decay in planw of taan: Y Roots broken: Y M Sail eracidng: Y Car -pounding factors: Lean severity Ll severe ❑ moderate V tow CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual ddfeem and rate Hu it r_.....r DEFECT ROOTCRONN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow, sweep Codominants/tcrks PAultiple attachments Included barit - Excessive end weight Crackslspoits Hangers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay Cavity Conks/mushro oms/brick et lased rig/sap flove Laoso/tracked bark Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood/stubs BOrers/terrnitea/ants Cankers/gallruburts Previous failure RATING Tree part most likely to fall: Faltce Raterttlal• 1-40rw: 2-medirmr 3-high; 4-severo Inspection period annual bias usal other Size of par:: n - c6" 2 - 6-1 e" 175-45 cm); Faibrre Potential+ Sae of Part +Target Rating = �;n9 -7 +�+ _ 3-18-W-(45-75cm);4->36"(?5cm) —L� ` V==N: ". - accas:1w use; 2 - intermittent use; ABATEMENT 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use Prune: 0 remove defective part []reduce end weight Ocro wn Glenn.. I�thin %l a gnany CFerown reduce 7 re trueturs ❑shape Cable/6race; -. Insaectfurth0r: prnot crown Odecay ❑aerial pmonitor Remove tree? Y N Replace? Y N Move target? Y N Cthe- Effecf on adiaeerd trees: onone Devaluate Nobficatiorz ❑awner 0manager f3go�rerrring agency Ewe: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIOMAf_ s dated L4 Dec 08 09 08:33a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.5 44EE ASSESSMENT FGAM CEBi®E® AU sections of this form must be ful completed b a Qualified afesfi,d'ti�T, /•A hazard tree must have a target within 1.5x the height of the tree.) Site/Address: a O i v m a'i U ) ID r DEC 0 8 2009 MaplLocation: 2. OEVELOPMENT SERVICES Owner: ublic COUNTER F private_ unknown— other Date:�Q) 3a p� ;dame of Tree Assessor-�—�F� I[ vQ J 1SA. Q� pt Other Hm'essional Certificates and Qualifications: TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree '�. species_/` L y 0wi: --'�.l It ottrunlm: 1 Height• _ spread: x � Farm: )gtenereltysymmetric ❑mino.asymmetry ❑stump sprout Qstag-headed Crown Ciasg .160minant ❑ co-dartmant 0 intermediate 0 suppressed carve crown ratio:- ` D% Age lass ayoung nsemi mW.,,,, ttae cover ma urelsenrsceni Pruning History: ❑crown cleaned ❑ excessively shined Citopped )Apm ra'ued ❑pollarded ❑ cratvn reduced ❑flush cuts ❑eabied/bra,d ❑ none ❑—111pleproninge.ants Apuox dates: Special Value: pspec'unen ❑herilagelhfstoric Cnitdlife 041nusuaf 0streettree ❑wean Qshade Mndigenous ❑protected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Falrage Cover- _9-11 t 001=c0neaetic rc EpormssY - ... ..11 i? � CrocvVt ooslruatidns: Foliage�enstty:.(normal❑sparse L-Wsi a �❑snn;R ❑stages DwireRtesL'sigrts Ocabies Mnual shoot growtt>;❑exceitent, verage ppoor T-19 0ebaek? V tt 0 curDtpave.•nent p guards Wbunttwood development pexcellent-kg.verege Opoor ❑none ❑ , Vlgorclas=C.euC2ltentll:SFI-Crag- Qfarropoor Major pestsidiseasem SITE CONDITIONS Site character )R6dence 0comrnercial0indusr{at ❑parts G POrl Space ❑natural .0 woodland/forest Landscape hype: C pay 0 raised fled Q ccldaine ❑ mound ❑ la a t a shrub border 0 wind break Irrigation: gone ❑ adequate Q Inadequate ❑ excessve ❑ !rank tiroettled Recent site disturbance? Y © ❑ construction 0 sotrdisturbance II grade change ❑time tearing ❑site slag irsg 96 ek'ipGrra puveJ: D% Y(3-25i5 25-,SO% •r 50-759L 5-'100% Pavement rJted? Y tv °6 drip One wJfiB sae:' 035 10-25% 25 50% 50-75% 75-100% V. driptine grade towered: 695 10.25 25-50% 50-75% :5-70o% SOB problems: ❑ drainage 0sha7ow ❑compac+.ed Odmu h g ty ❑Sat:ne ola%a ne ❑ ar *c ❑ small vetume ;]disease ce rter ❑historyo. iyl ❑ clay D exvansi+e p st ? ❑ aspect uastruetions: ❑lights ❑sknage ❑iineof-site !] fend ❑ overhecd lines ❑undetgwtx-Id uGli(es ❑ traffic ❑adjacent veg. 0, Exposure to wind: ❑ single tree `.klfeioyi campy 0 above canopy 0 recently exposed 0 windward, ce,-py edge p area prone to w!ndshrtwr Prevailing wind direction: L V occurrence of sncrv&e $iprmS ❑ never - s"om ❑ regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: -2!;�uifdhg Ctparl{ing O U&T,- ❑Fe Canto © �stran ❑rera2aton—-•dscape 01--ascape C.Sma-_-dams ❑utility Una& rget be mcved? Y Can use be restrEctedT Y Occupancy: O occasional use ❑tnterr:itrent u3o fl!requent tube-�<-stant use 5 Dec 08 09 08:33a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.6 TREE DEFECTS ROOT r 0-lic75: Suspect root rot: Y O Mushroomkonk1bradx! present Y © FR e� Fxoosedrootc: ❑tavere ❑nvderrta 14. Underrrmwd: ❑severe Elmda ormeGv Root pruned: Root area affecicdr % Buttress Grounded: Y N YJneric E' VE nectKeted root aroa: (3aavare Q mod:rda -V .4. Fcr entW for coon ftdure Clsevere ❑ moderate -lvaW LE-IAk deg,fronveracd ❑naturs ptumatural Ja�sett-comWed Soilhea": Y ra 8 2009 Decay in Plane of Wen: Y O Raots broka= Y �ftJ �i �jng: Y G) DECL1 t, Campovndng recmrs Lean severity: ❑ severed ❑l moderate u iov, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CROWN AEFEC78r Indicate presence of indvidual defech and rate their severity (s.-severe, m=moderate• waird) COUNTER DEFECT ROQTCRCWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow, svmep CadonllnantsfParks Multiple attadiments I.rmfuded bark FAces8ive end weight CracksrspRis Hangers Girdling Woundslseam Decay Cavity Co nks/mushrooms,fbra,-W 9leeding!sap flow Loose/Fracked bark Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwoodlstubs Borem/termitestants Cankers/galwburls Previous failure RATING Tree part nest likely ;o fall i �IkA3Y 1 lnspcction nenod: annual biannual otter FailucIPotential + Size a{Part} 4t Targe Rztirtg= Hazard ABATEMENT Failure PCtendul: 1-Ica; 2-medium; 3-hi.9h; 4-severe Size at part: t- c6- 2 - 6-78" t15-45 an,k 3 - 7 8-SW (45-75 cm); 4 - >36' (75 cm) Tz%et fatirw: t - occasional use: 2 - intern*tent use; 3 - frequent use; 4 - consL-ud usa Prune: ❑removedefectivepart OroduceandvvefgM ❑cnrnncleat Othm Orasacanopy Ocrovmntduce ❑resructure f33nape Cabfo/tirace: 1>tsPeetA+rMer. Qroot ererwn ❑decay ¢aerial QmonitOr Removetree? Y N Replace? Y N More target? Y N Outer• Effect onad0cerftfrees: Onone Qevahrate NoWmation: pawner ❑manager EI4o'+effmg agencY Dda SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL LcD 30 sign dated 7 Dec 08 09 08:34a LeTe Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.7 ." AEE ASSESSMENT FGr*V AU sections of this farm mast he fully Completed by a qualified tarofessiclnal (A hazard tree must have a�taarget within 1.5x the height of the tree.) Site/Address: M143 Q mc-) f C 1! 1 VJ Or biap/Locatiom _ 'A-- a Owner, ublic p private unknown other Date: A D 5 Name of Tree Assesso, li-n n I Rei- LU Q f 11 l3 Is, P N V2 C9 if - Other Professiana Certificates and Qualifications: TREE CHARACTERISTICS ----- Qt3H: M of trunks: Height uL_— Spread:_ Fan= Ogenerally syrr,metic asymmetry [2stump Sprout Oslag-headed DEC 8 7009 CrawnCta= didominani Dco-dominant 0 intermediate D suppressed 6J lr LiJtJJ uvecrown ratio: SO% '99CLIM ❑youig ❑semi ns�rs s/ tune CJarcr-MaWrelsenesccrrt DEVELOPMENT SENCES Pruning History: ❑crown cleaned o ey.Cessrre:y thinned ❑ toppedwn raised Dpa!arded ❑«w an reduced ❑iksh cuts ❑cabbtedia.WUNTER D mono 0 muttiole pnrning events Appmx. dates Special Vslue Lepecimen `heritageMistoric ❑wildlife Dunusoa 09treet tree Dscreen Dsaadria idigenous Dp>r aed b otc Y 9 agent' TREE HEALTH Foliage Cwmr-k "al Qerrorric❑necrotic Epicorm:es? Y © C-rovrth obstructions: Foliage Density: 'LemrmalOsparse Lears¢e$f!ormatDamatl ❑stakes ❑ wirekies Gsigns Gcab!e, Annual shoot growth:pexcellent.Mverage OP or Twig Dieback? Y r i 0curbipzvement ❑ guards Woundwood development- Mxcellwt�<-erage ❑poo. pnono Qorher vigorefass ❑exce9err[ aMwags 0 fafr Elpow Major peswdissasm SITE CONDITIONS site Ctmracter. ytYesldence Ocomr tercial Qindusttia! t7 park ❑ open space D natural ❑ v bcdtand ticrest —� Landscape t��y/ppe: ❑Parkway ❑ raised bed ❑ container D n orund O farm ❑ shrub border D wind break Irrigation: W—FIC O adequate O inadequate ❑ eKc:sstve ❑ trunk wettted rtecent site disturbance? Y © ❑ censiructfon D snit dmhs.bance D grade change D tine clearing ❑site cleaInct i. dripiine Faro& tyro 10-2596 25-Sp36 50 7596 75-1000A Pavement rifted? Y N 3: m1p4rtew/tiY30it' 0% 70 25-50X+ 50-75`lc ?5-1009, 'S dripfine grade lowered: O% tO-2595 25-50% 5'J-75S5 ?S-YQO Soo problems: Q drainage Dshaliow Gcempacted ❑draughty ❑ soli_ ❑ yka ine D adC= D small volume OaLaase center 0.1iistoTyof tat, ❑ clay ❑ exParrsive ❑ slo,^_e---i_? 0 aspect Obstructions p tights ❑ signage l❑ lirte.af-sY,e ❑ viee� �-�� ❑ overF.eed Grres ❑un..ergrctrtd l.�tti5e5 []>iatfic Qadjacer>i vtz�. ft_ Exposure to wind: ❑ single tree yr t:antnN Q above P,v ❑ recertdy exposed © winaWard. gyp, edge [I area prone to wlndthrov, Prevailing wind directiorc yC� ❑ never -"t-'<Setdom D regufady TARGET Y Use Undar Tree:•!")d ng Q partgfig G rraft Doe's rie.t ❑ C an target be moved2 Y D recre.,Y rnl ❑ landscape Dhardscape Dsmai Teat rras ❑ utiity Un;t Gut use be restticted7 Y Ucm*ancy: u occasional use ❑ later *MM use Oirequend use -dt6snsbant use Dec 08 09 08:34a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.8 n q • =:�qK Suspect root rot Y 6N MushroorrJcenk/bracket present Y © Mr. Exposed roots: Gsevere Omoderate -115;w Undermined: Osevere ❑moderate w Root ffruned: Roos area aHecteck % SuNness %rounded Y G Wnem RE VE d MCA area: poevem El mra odete Jnx PCerdjW for roil f-:.ev u. ❑sere ❑ moderate �o-.v �WV LEAN.' deg. tonv&timt OnaturS [3t matural Self -corrected Soil nearing: Y � DEC 0 8 2009 DecayW in planoof an: V Roots brakew Y NI Soil cracking: Y N Campowtdrig ratters; Lean severity: O severe ❑ moderate >4w DEVELOPMENT SERACES GROWN DEPECM Indicate presence of iM3vid1at delects and rate their severfty (sbsevere, m=moderate, Wmv) COUNTER DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRAAtCHES Poor:aper 13ow, sweep Codominantstfoiks Multiple attachments Indude0 bent Excessive end weight Crackslsplas, Hangers Girdling Woundsrseam Decay Cavity Co nksJmushroor:re/brack et @feedinglsap fbw Loose/.cracked nark Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood/stubs t3o MA-ermites/ants C anke-49alWburts P-ovkxw failure RATINIG Mee psr¢ most likely to fall: (I r()VI-J 1 1 inspection period: asvatttf =muel other Failure Potential +Size ;Past * Target Rztfrsg= Hazard Rytug I + '4' --`— lj — q ABATEMENT Failure Fotental: 1-10w; 2-mediU M 3-hgh 4-write Size of part 1- <6' 2 - 6-18,115-45 cmg 3 - 16-36- 05-75 crrtj; 4 - >30- (l5 cm) Ta getsing: 1 - occasiortrs! use; 2 - irttarrnf.tent use; 3-1,requent use; 4 -constant use Pr—: Qmmove defec*e part 0 reduce ersd vmigtrt Ccmvvn cLmn O hin O else cancay O crown reduce O restructure ❑shape CabWE!mee: tnsped further, Or= crown Odecay Oaerial Ommitor Removeiree? Y N Replace? Y N R'loretarget? Y N OL'ser, EHeetanadjacent treew. Onone devaluate Notification: {]owner Omanager 09ovemingagency Date: SIGNATURE OF PROFESMobiAL =41 Dec 08 09 08:34a Leslie Yarbrough 206 362-3011 p.9 SitelAddress: Mapl Location TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM HAZARD RATING: Owner: public private �_ unknown other 2 + Z--+ --'J- = Failtm + Size +Target=Hazard Date fist S ISA* ajiL iA Potential cf part Rating Rating Immediate action needed PICbOn5tr5 Signature: Needs Anther inspection 1 Dead tree TREE CRARACTERISTICS Tree A species: Dot: # of trunks; _ 7 Height 1- Spread: Forte: 'Xgenwdfy symmetric❑ mirror asyrmnetry ❑ m*r asymmetry 13 stump sprout Q sWil heeded Crown Class: ❑ dominant Xco-0onAnard ❑ irdemrediate D suppressed R EC E I tSr E FA-1) Uvo crown ratlo: M% Age Class: )( young Q semi -mature D mature D over-rnaturalsenescent �v FA.av'+" Pruning Kiworp: D crown dcaned ❑ ezoessively thinned topped �crovm raised D pollarded ❑ crown reduced ❑ flush ..is ❑ eabledbrace ❑ none Ymuldoepnrningevents Appmxdatx dUE, 08 90033 Special Value: ❑ specimen ❑ herhagefhisioric ❑ widrde ❑ unusual 0 wed tree ❑ screen ❑ shade)katdigenous ❑ protected by gov. agen®EVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE HEALTH COUNTER Foliage Cover. A normal ❑ chronic ❑ necrotic Epiconntcs? Y & Growth obstructions: Foliage Density. Xnomml ❑ sparse leaf size: ❑ normal ❑ smell ❑ stakes ❑ wimAies ❑ signs Deahles Annual shoot growth: ❑ mrcollent `0 average ❑ poor ?Wig debaek? Y N� ❑ curb/pav`e_men D rds Woundwood development: ❑ e=eQerd ❑ average ❑ poor ❑ none ether V i �t � Yienr class: D excellent ❑ auarage'$fair Lip., Maim pesteldiswases: SITE CONDMONS Site Character. )6side0ce ❑ oommefdal ❑ industrial ❑ park ❑ open space ❑ natural ❑ woodlandfforest Landscape type: ❑ parkway ❑ raised bad ❑ container ❑ mound ❑ tam ❑ shrub bonier ❑ wind break Irrigation: X none ❑ adequate D inadequate ❑ ezcessNs ❑ trunk vrrl8ed Recent site disturbance? Y ©. ❑ construction ❑ soildisturbance ❑ grade ctmge ❑ nine clearing D site clearing % dripltne paved: 0% 10-26% 256046 50.75% m 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N % dripline w1811 so ik 10.25% 50-75% 75-100% % dripline grade lowered: ?4) 10.25% 25-60% 50-75% 75.leoA Soul problems: D drainage a shallow U compacted ❑ droughty O seine ❑ alkeline ❑ ack lc ❑ small volumo D disease center ❑ historyof fall ❑ pay ❑ expansive ❑ slope ? Obstructions: []lights L7 signage ❑ 6ne-d-site ❑ view goy -headlines D u ndrsground ufrrties ❑ iraKc ❑ ae>Jaoent veg. O Exposure to wind: )!(pngte'� tr� ropy ❑above canoPy ❑ riroeMly r q=ad O windward canopy edge ❑area prone to w rKMrcw Prevailing wind direction: Occumenceormkowrice.sionns ❑never O seldom ❑ regularly TAROT Use Under Tree: X(twdding ❑ paridrig X(r-Tc ❑ ply 13 recreation ❑ I . ` � andscape ❑ hardscape D smgl features ❑ ulr7itY lines van target De amett? Y Ili Cad M be restr c6a Y Oet:upanuy: ❑ occasional use D irrlenniumn use l7 frequent use irl t use 9 Dec 08 09 08:35a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p,10 RECEIVE C', TREE DEFECTS DEC ® B 2009 SERVICE' RooraeFecrs: /� COUNTER Suupaat rout rot: Y /rf ] MaehroomncoaWbracket present Y ID: Exposed routs: C1 sevcm l -Wersle ❑ tow undermined:m 0 severe oderate U low Root pruned: / _ P.=area aRacted: % Buttress wounded: Y D wean: Restricted cost area- O severe Grate ❑ low Poterttlal for mat faiturre ❑ severe moderate 0 low LEAN: deg. From verliumi ❑ r stunt ri unmelurst inoo-corrected Soil hna ng: Y Q Decay In plane of ream: Y 114, Roots brokerr. Y C� Soft craclrion: Y �yjt Compounding factom. Lean aeverfty: 13 severe U moderate low CROW DEFEM: Indimft pemrlee of inMwWuai defects and rate theirWm tty (s=severe, m�ttadarate, 1=fowi r DEFECT ROOTCROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRAHCNES Poor Raper Bow, sweep CodominamaNarks MWbp* axachm9M treduded bark Excessive end we ght rachWeputs Hangers Girdling Wbundslsaem Oem Cavity Conkslmush reomolbra cket BleedirWsap flow omefcra*ad bark Nesting hokffUee hWe Deadwoodistuts Bagsflermitaelants Cankerslgalt urle Previous allure HAZARD RATING Tree part most likely to tall: Carlo �; � (� 1 �- Failure ppteffW: 1-low; Z-medlum; 3-high; "evere Inspection period: _ arwmei biannual Size of park 1 - <5' (1b Cm); 2-13-1f1' (1546 cm); Failure Potentlai + e or Pat + Tang Rating = Rating 3—1t130' (45.75 Cm); 4 -> 30' (?5 cm) --6•�— Y S 4 I a et rating! 1_ nA 9 occasierrel use; 2 —intermittent use; HAZARD ABATEMENT 3 —frequent use; 4 —Constant use Prune: ❑ remove defecrrve part 17 reduce end weight r1 crown dawn ❑ thfn O rafse Canopy O crown reduce Orr slruoture ❑ shape Cahle/Brace: Inspect hrrtlltrr ❑ noX Crown D decay O eadal O monitor Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N MoveTamst Y N Elmrt on a0)ar0m trees: ❑ none ❑ evaluate Netfficatron: ❑ owner O manager y4loveming agancq COMMENTS Hate: Q4 1 19 uec uo uto uo:ooa Leslie Tar u O.I I - TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM AO sections of this form must be fultv corm letedb a cert,eed arborist SWAddress: 12a 5 0U t ti� Di/ Map!locaftr F ZARD RATING: Owner: public private unknt o�ylrt�1'�other �1 �nr �____ + + il Date: �z/�-t / P� /11 V 01 i$A# ure ential + Size f Target =Hazard Part Rating Ratfrtg Arborish Signature. hrunediate attar needed Needs fufther inspection Dead tree TREE CHARACTEMSTICS Tree DBH- Spsdes J aPCO DBH:�"ysyn,4,i�rn1nor4symrnetr, _ aftrurrlcs`L Height Spread: I �� ®® Form: O �Nr O stump sprout O stagfieaded E P `�y By C►ownClass: M Live crown rsdtoO codominaM O intermediate a:� O �PPn=seed Age Cuss: )(young O semt•mature O mature O over-mawrelsenesaent DEC 0 8 2 09 Pruning lgatpry: O emwer deened O eu —dvdy fiimted Cl topped O crown raised O polarded O crown reduced [I flush cuts O rabdedlbraced more ❑ multiple Pruning events Approx. dates OEVELOPMENT SER1fiCE SpeClal Value: O qmw men D haitageQdstorte ❑ w4d6te L] unusrat El sired tree ❑screen O shads irmdmgeneua ❑ protected by ga. agauy COUNTER TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover: normal O chronic O necrotic Epleormlcs? Y N Growth obstructions: FaRoje Density. )(normal O sparse Leaf atze: O normal O small ❑ stakes O witel6es O signs []cables An tual Shoot 9tovft. O emot went average O poor Twig Oietwit? Y N O curbfpavement D guards WOundwood derelo(aaaat O exa3gad O average O poor )norms axodlent O adher Vigor We= O �avaage O fair ❑poor Major pesiSidiseases: SITE CONDMO14S Siva Character. Arealdeoce O commercial ❑ industrW ❑ perk q open space O nahuai O woodlend/forest tarrdaeapa VW- O parttwey braised bed O Container O mound O larm O shrub border ❑ adnd break kftetlOM none O adequate O inadequate ❑ excessive p trunk wetted Recent stte dh&xt&WAy . Y a coruVudian ❑sal dmshabartce ❑ grade change O line desiring ❑ site dearng 10"� 25-SM 50-75% 75.160% Pavement tifted? Y N rXr drlpgoo wall sack 0 10.25% 25SM SG-75% 75.100% 9G dripNaegrade lowered:10-25% 2560% -5475% 75.100% Soil probtwas: O dn3hrage ❑ shatfoxr ❑ cumPacted 0 sa O droughty line ❑ atlairme Oadi ac O slag irolume O disease cadet O historyof fail O day O a ❑slope ? �t Obstructions: O lights D smgnage D rna ds>7e O view ~— Ooverhead ryes O underground abilities O traffic: O adjacent veg. O Exposure v wind: k single tree Ow canopy Oahove ca-Py ❑ eeoentry exposed iJ wrindwrard, canopy edge O Prevailing wind dlrectiOri; PY 9 area prone to windlhnow Ooeunenca Of snawkee stale O never Xmdorn ❑ regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: O building ❑ parNng .)djr2fflc p pedestrian, ❑ recreation Can target be rnosed? Y N� � Qtandsrape ❑ hardscape ❑ emailfeatures ❑ utirdy Mes Can use�b//e rns6lcted? Y occupancy- O oocaslOrtal use ❑ intemridM use y�frequant use O ant use —. — ... t I Dec 08 09 08:36a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3Ul I P. rz- TREE DEFECTS MOT offlecTa: suspect root not Y f N 1 Ntuahn oWconkfbracket present: Y t& ID; Eltposed roots: ❑ severe C] rtw lerala iow Undermined: B severe O lnoderata law Root pruned: Rowe area affected. % leuttrews wcwnded: Y ON wnen: ry(� 49 Restricted root area O severeo moderate Potential far root failure: ❑ severe O rota glowDE LUi) LEAN: deg. From vertical D natural D unnatural O oW-corrected Sall heav ng: Y Decay In plane of lean: Y N� Roots broken: YoN Sofa cracking: Y DEVELOPMENT COUNTERERiiIC��, Compounding faetam Lean severit): ❑ severe O moderate u row CROVA DEFECTS: Indicate, presence of Individual defects and rate their severity (severe, nw=moderete, Plow) DEFECT ROOT CROM TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper wmwp -CodowtIna talf orke Iple atfar-hmente Included bark Excamilve end weight cmckalspilts Hangers Girdling Woundsiseam away Cavity Canke mu rlafbtadset aleedinglup flow Lcoadcrecked bark Nesting ho dlbee hive eadwoo u Balarellefmitwants Cankowlial alburls Previous tallure HAZARD RATING Tree part most likely to fell: 'ra 6 Failure potential: 1-low; PLmedium; 3h)gh; &severe Inspedtonperiod annual biannual curer_ SbOsofpart t --cG (z5km); 2-6-1e'(15-45cm); Failure Pobmdled t Size of Pan + Targ�ett Rating = Kamm Rom 8—18-St)' (45-75 cm): 4 -> 86' (75 cm) +— �►�+--a I &get rating: 1—accasf- A- us% 2 — trdennitfent use; S —frequent use; 4 — constant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: O ramom defective pert o reduce end weigftt Cablenraee: D crown dean ❑ thin O raise canopy M crown reduce o reatnttture D ehape tnspact further O root crown O dewy O aerial O manlier Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Other Elect on adjacent trees: 4 none ❑ evaluate f liReatlan: ❑ avner ❑ manager O goveming agency COMMENTS t ?_ Dec 08 09 08,36a Leslie Yarbrough 20M62-3011 P.18 ' - TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM AM secdons of this form must be fuft cmaletedby a c rtifed srborist. sile�pdar�eSs; t 75 �-1 �O n � V rn � i C. V i t� v� �)' • r .MaplLocattort: — Ovmer. {public---_..�. p►ate unknown`_ other Date:12%Arborlst iSA# N_WOAc ArborWa Signature: HAZARD RATING: Felhlre + Target = Hamd Potential of part Rdng mmedlate action Neaada harttier Ins p Or n Dead Lane 'TREE CHARACTERISTICS I i 7Yae ee Species: Cn V —_-100_ ^ r ( i j < Vl t pet+: * at trua#a: _ 2 7`— fMHBht Spread:�i_._ :bRn: Q generally SymmahfcQ minor asyn qy Sf MWW W d stump sprout p stag t:eatleq Crown Class: U dominacst ��datrarr�! ❑ inlemtedieia ❑ muppressed Lira Crewe mloa�36 Age Cfass Q young ❑ semFinahrre mature ❑ over-meturmbenesmrtt Ds Pruning HbdorX ❑crown deaned II 9XMsjye(y thtnaed R topped ❑ amn raised ❑ PoQerded O crown reduced ❑ flush cult 13 MbId011bre RECEIVED, ®� @ . Won s a mrJnpte pruning everns Appnox, dates DEC(y Speetel Value: Oepacimen ❑ beritsgeJhlaterfe Uwndl7a a tmmual 0 alreet tree ❑ screen 0st de)4rrrpganan ❑ Pmtsmov, agency C ed by ® B 2009 TREE HEALTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COIIIyTEIR Fallsge Coverml . O raal ❑ chreuie Q neangc Eplegimiesq Y WINE Growth ebatructions: FOUHa i►ensley 0 tanrarl fi(aparse Loaf alas Q normal Q small Annual ahuot r O excakilt Q average Q stekca ❑ strelties O signs Qcables �IJea T�+IlIFy M�bback7 N Q curb rd nta ercundwogddevebpmartt pmtxMstt Qavarege Qpow )(,on, 0other ❑ gua YlgOr claw: Q ew:B krd a avam " Q lair poor euJor p-ft dlsessest SITE CONDITIONS Site Character; )(residarree ❑ conanardal n brdLM" ❑ park p cpm $peon Q rrawret ❑ Lett"cape type: O pathway Q railed bad ❑ onmetner ❑ rm mod 0 term O shrub bonier Clwlnd 6 d irtlgegon: Ign1 Q adtquabs a rnadaquata Q eaerssive Q tm* wetued a disturbance? Y N Q eonsdrudion % drfpl Q" dlefurbanoe 11 grade ohmage Q line deariQ dngng s$e dea SL drtpllrle palved: 0 rJi dApllna +rifilt B91L. 10-25% 25-50% 60'75% 75.100% Pavement lifEed? Y N 10.251A 2s go% So.75% 75 100% % d4ptinegrade lowered: t196 10-25% 15 9096 50-75% 7-,100% Soo pmhiams ❑ 4ralnege Q ahellav ❑ OOd pMftd Q drggghty O saline Q arkaGne II acidic Q email volume 0 disease center ❑ htelary of tali ❑day ❑err38hoie Qelope 7 SiPWt Obatruelions: a rights D sM9nage Q nnadaibe q clay, II „ Exposure d Rene b urldw9mund utintlee ❑ braid= ❑ taiJaeen[ vmy g M wind: Q single tree 1f�pslow txnoPy ❑abrrveearto Pteraplag wrad dtrectrore try D reoengy mgrosed Q war Vmfd, canopy edge ❑ area Prone to wMdthrow I]aeurrenoe of enowRoe atoms ❑ never D Seldom Q reguledy TARGET Us* Urrder Trees ❑ bulidi ❑ t ang xtrattic O pedestrian Orxrealton Qlandscape phardsra CIA begat fss moved? Y N Can =0 bO r"M Ae O amaq features _� ulrlilir ones oocupsncy: ❑ occasWnd use tY� O nssrt►iisnt use uenluse use Q constant use Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.14 TREE DEFECTS RoorDEFECTS: RECEIVED suspect root rat.• V" AIlustuooarieartkibrackot tlnosarrt YIQ: ( exposed room; ❑aevere moderate 13 kw Undermined raver@ 0 awderato 0low DEC 08 2009 Root pruned: Root aMa IRMO& r �G Sanress wounaeJ.y N wren:R,wMrtod root aroma0 smote 13 moderate 13law Po"J"im for root facture:Aavere ❑at@ ❑ bw DEVELOPMENT COUNTER r SEfiil9C�5 1 f1.- deg. From verdd O nalarat O unnelural ❑ edf-oarmated son h*sv". Y N 9 S Decay In plane of teen: Y V Roots broken:Q N soil cmung{ r N Compounding facto , Lean eev*r*: O severe G moderate U tow C00 Wir DEFECTS: Indicate prasence of Indlv(dual derects and rate theh aevedty (s=snwe. rm nrodmaEe. 11,11m4 13EFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCH= taper .sweep 'n orlm mulinpl@ Quachments InctudWd dark -ExcesaIva'and vreight rackslspilts Hangera Girdling Woundslseam ❑ate C conka(mushmarnrobr—arwi HleeOngfsap now Lowelcmcked bark sung old/bee hive adw stubs t3orersAlamtites/ants cenkerafgalla/ourta Previousfailure HAZARD RATING n Tree part most aLx kely to fan: 1 -C 1 �(vl� �(A� FaHure Pole ftl: 41ow;1Lmedium; 3.hiah; 49evere (napectlon pertod!_ annual bier null other_ size or part 1 - cw (15 Crn): 2 -a-1w (1546 Cray: Failure Potential -r• Size of Part + Target Ratlng = i fazwd paling 3 —1 t}31r (45-75 cm); 4 • a 3(r (75 cm) + ' largal rating: 1 — oCCaeional uaat 2 — Intemrnfent use; 3 —frequent use; 4—conetant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: ❑ remove defective pert ❑ reduce end weight 13crown clean O thin d rater; canopy ❑ crmvn reduce Q regruclwe C l shape Cabtejentee ' rrrsp@etftrrther• O root aovvrt Odeoatr ❑ aerial ❑monitor mY Remove tree: Replaoe? Y N Alone Target'.; Y N Other. Effect on adJacent trees: O none 13 evaluate NotHieetion: El owner D manager 17 governing agency Date COMMENTS Ckk Y.cv'k y �ZU U d 19 Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362.3011 p.1 b TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM All sections of tthis form must be fully completed by a certified ar�borist. SitelAddress: )5 'H C°� l V i`�11�'1 i U 1 {'try lJ� HAZARD RATING: Map/Locatlon: Owner public,,A private unknown other Data: Arbffllst J tSA H v �0 Arborists Signature , AA - TREE CHARACTERISTICS 1 + + 3 = LQ-: Failure + Size + Target = Hazard Potenrial of part Rating Rating Immediate action needed Needs rtlrther inspection Dead tree E� Dell:td : 0.tWke:_ Freight: JS�2� Spread: R darn+: erbrdly symmetdcO minor asyrnntetry ❑ major aaynn etry O stump sprout ❑ stag -heeded Pl — E Crown Class: `�jorrinenf O co4orninannt D irdermse ediala ❑ suppresd LiDEC ®{i !WY ve crown ratiop-i4��.{�, un Age Crass: yog CI aamkrmbrra ❑ mature ❑ over-maturefsenescem U 200S Pruning History: O crown cleaned ❑ examdveiy thimned a topped ❑ crown raised ❑ pdWded 13 annnt reduced O flush cuts D Cabledlbrac�p LUEiHY $ER1/ICE,�, . )(none O multiple pruning events Approx- dates t% Special Value: ❑spedmen O her lagaq tonic ❑ wildWe ❑ unusual Cl street tree ❑ scntan 0 shadeAlndlgenous D protected by gov, agency COUNTER TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover:%porrnai D chronic O necrotle Eplcormice? Y tJ Fclhge OenstQ: normal 11 sparse . Ia*f stye: ❑ noanal O smml Annual shoot growth: a excellent Xavemgs 0 poor Tvrlg a] b.*? Y N Wouadwood development: 0 w=Denl 13 average O poor Vnone vrgor class: O excellent Yaveroge Ofair ❑poor Major pestsfdrseases SITE CONDITIONS Growth obstructions: O stakes O w1rahes ❑ sign Oaatkas 10 curblpevemenl 17 guards CJ other Site character. *esidwce ❑ commercial O ipdustrisl ❑ Park O Open space O natural ❑ woodiandRoresl Landseapo typo; ❑ parkway O raised bed O oerdainer O mound D lawn ❑ ahrub border D wind bma W1901lOn: O none O adequate O inadequate D exconsive O Imnk wailed Recent site dlsterhance? Y NN ooltslructicn D sell 410urbance O grade change, 17 One dearing ❑ site clearing % drlpllne pavedr 10-25% 2"0% 50-75% 75•t00% Pavereent If ted? Y N % drips" w1fill soil: 10-26% 25-50% 50-7S% 75.io0% % drlpllnegraos mwaaed: 09r. 10-25% 25-SC% 50-75% 75-100% $09 problems: O drainage 0 shallow ❑ compacted O droughty ❑ saflne ❑ alkaline D addic 0 small volume ❑ disease carder ❑ historyof fail O clay O expensive O srape 7 asp= obstruction: ❑ lights ❑ slgnaee ❑ flns•d-site ❑ view ❑ oft haad rings O underground utfrdies ❑ Iratfic ❑ adjacent veg, D Exposure to wind: O single tree1*dow canopy ❑above canopy D recently exposed ❑windward, canopy edge ❑ area prase to windthmw Prevelling wind direction: 0crufmc, cl snowNne storms ❑ nover ❑ seldom O regularly TARGET Use under Tree: ❑ buddin/gr�)arking ❑ tcafOc 4 pedeablan ❑ recreation ❑fandaeape ❑ hard=pa CI ern611 felltutes Q utility lines can ta'irgs1 ea moved? Y r k1� Can use be restricted? Y @N Occupancy: ❑ oecastonal use ❑ intermittent use frequent rue Q constant use 15 Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.16 TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: Suspeatrootrat Yf Nl Mushroomicank/bracketpnsaet: YGN ID: Hi ECEINE�.+'. mgmad roots: D seaveeze 13 reoderate Sl low Undermined. D severe O maderale ww Ro t prurad: / `Root sees eft-1 rt % Beltres8 Wound", Y Q rime-, IIL1�-9 2009 Raetrloted mot area: ❑ severe O maderstOXMIN Potential for root failure: D severe O modends �kn- LPANf dap. From vertbal ❑ natural O urmakrral € 30-aortected Soil bos-768: Y N DEVELOPMENT SERV`CES Mac" In plans *Flaw. Y D Roata broken: Y l) Boll cracklrrg: YQ COUNTER Compounding factors: Lean aeverlty: O smwe O (nederans U law CROIMY DEMCTS: hldt=e presence 0f IndMdual defects and Bin their,seventy (severe, M--rnoderats, 1--low) 'DEFECT ROOT CROPIN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES fter Bow, sweep Codaminanialtorks ultiple atta n rk $xoesslve and welght Credray s Hangers Ohdling Wounds/seam Cavlty ConksAnuah bradret elaed rWasp flaw oose/cracked bark esling tmidtbee hive pea u BorersRarmRae/arrts CenRere/gal de Pravlousfailure HAZARD RATING �n ` Tree pa_t most likely to fall: -i _4 _LA 0 1✓��l Failure potential: 1-low; Zmedium; 34righ; 4-severe Inspection period: _ ertmral biannual dhet— Size of part t - <6^ (15 dnr 2 - 6-1W (15-45 am); Failure Potential + Sim of Part + Target Rextng - "auto Ron 3 -18-J(r (45-75 cm); 4 - a 30- (75 cm) r ' _ target rating 1 - Occasional use; 2 - Intermittent use; HAZARD ABATEMENT 3 -frequent US,-,: 4-constanf use Prune. O remave deractl-e parl t7 reduce end Weight ❑ crtnnl dean 13thin ❑ rRse canopy ❑ crown redur, O resUvoure C7 shape CableiBrarx: InspectfLr9mr. Drool crown O decay O wOsl D monitor Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Otber. Meet on adlacent trees: a none O evarueto Notification: O owner 13 manager ❑ 9%mmrng agency Date: COMMENTS Dec 08 09 08:38a Leslie Yarbrough PROPOSAL 206-362-3011 p.17 tv Washington Tree Expefts 9792 Edmonds Way Suite #123 Edmonds WA. 98020 Office:206-362-3380 * 425-771-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax. 206-362-3011 Fed. ID# 91-2007614 N UBI # 601-960-331 N $2,000,000 Liability Coverage — Contractor # washite926mm Added Info Lilin Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 920-698-2229 lilinwu@gmaii.com Estimate Dace Time of Esd"ote Refereme # 12-4-09 LF 06-8850 BID We hereby propose to furnish material and labor to complete the work outlined here in for the sum of: plus sales tax We accept all inajor credit cards Washington Tree Experts proposed to complete tree removal using the following methods: -a professional tree climber will ascend each tree and bring it down in manageable pieces (no felling or craning) -only the use of private property is necessary -the equipment will be set up in the driveways and will include truck and chipper -all portions of the trees will be dropped on private property RECEIVED DEC 0 8 2009 . DEVELO COUNTER SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS 121 Fifth Ave. No. Edmonds, Washington 98020 — yuaranux au mauenai usea in mis contract to be as specified above and the entire job to be done in a neat, workmanlike manner. Any variations from this proposal or alterations requiring extra labor or material will be performed only upon written order and billed in addition to the sum covered by this contract. Agreements made with our foremen are recognized. Necessary Permits are property owner's responsit�ility TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON 308 COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS NOT PAID WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE WILL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED 308 WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WrTHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED JOB DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above specifications, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (I)(we) hereby authorize the performance of this UJen Estimator CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONTRACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER '1 Dec 08 09 08:39a Leslie Yarbrough PROPOSAL 206-362-3011 p.20 Washington Tree Ex'pefts 9792 Edmonds Way Su.te #! 123 Edmonds WA. 98020 Offlce:205-362-3380 * 425-771-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed. Mt 911-2007614 N 01 # 601-960-331 N $2,000,000 Liability Coverage N Contractor # washite926mnr Subn-fted To: I Estimate Date Time of Estimate Reference Lilin Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone Added Info 920-698-2229 Illinwu@gmail.com 8r-4-09 LL 1 06-8362 BID We hereby propose to famish material and labor to complete the vvork outlined here In for the sums of: plus sales tax We accept all .major credit cards DEC. 08 gods We guarantee all mate7nal used in this contract to be as specified above and the entire fob to be done in a neat, workmanlike manner. Any variations from t!Vs proposal or alterations requiring extra labor or material will be performed only upon written order and billed In addition tc the sum covered by this contract. Agreements made with our foremen are recognized. Necessary Permits are properti awriets --- responsibility. TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON JOB COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS NOT:PAID WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE WILL BE A 5014 LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED 300 WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OFTHE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED JOB DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The alcove specifications, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (I)(we) hereby authorize the performance of thl Estlraator _ CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS COtITRACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY IS SIGNED AND RE71JUIED TO BIDDER �i qC� yf � � � G c y t�gj , C ¢,,• r i 1: 1V 11 il ,�} s �__.t a 2� _ . E rA t • f r J — -tr�� 1 � ... ....�---�--^'--.'^'<�,"�_,,,.��,,✓'viz, J%,. -'S ve �, 'r `jam � `" :F� +_lye t r-� �� r tl 7-y"k, ",— "� r r r s . fro"^ y'.: ``"""_ _ .<°. M~.w.��'av ♦>'k . }I A .n � ,# r k�.0 " 3 ••'� Vim+ ,p a. u+. i ( s "ASP �,. .:.. is1.,.e�,� Jyl�rlti Y,:1 • � �'h�°� �:tr,/.��i': f �,•-�c r/1 11 r � r s • t Lf t• •�' r«°• y `%L� � '�� ; ' � t t `_ F � r t � � �rt�^ta d � Rh'It � �4�rr� � '��xikp �'. ,r �� "Ss � � f �` � rP� � i I �� ` � �( �� r t'� � 1�, �'r � - x A t ✓ t '. .r, � ♦ Ste` �. ,_ w r >, r a Tt i `.rot 1 Ix' r+ ` _• s i''l: i..' J '1 t/ '�... �• i:":- �� -?'�. 'rIN'ti ✓ }:t?,f'• z ,�' ,.i ti+ � �� i = t }t r ru •if '',�..r � .• ."s;, . �l �� ;'R ` y,{� ,ti t• h�, ��„ 4,ty„1 1 s .. iy o . P� e , � t 3 / � d r ,A i°W. +,t Tr.'Pt . � r� p• �^' � �` tie , ! t ,: 1 t r 1"�+ �s f"� '1 � �a��'fY'' ! a � f �N:i ��' • ....� �'}'��n 2.k� �.; a:+�/� �;i�. a .. •1r.. » •�.: .'' �. +Q,i ,;bx. t•'.' t •A. �yP y i . P r t .ir , "r r r�' a� _"v .t;i � `►,y , t4- yf_�11 } f t�+, "�'3 r tY:a.R "�f� tt• ��i� ,Shr� i'"P •:Y} ,>,t( 1 ., 4, a Y ,i '� ,. -^ l ` } 'g'Q t: !l fy 4. jr `?,t ty Fe t - PJ «' �� ;�' ' 'E 1•,� pw y, ,4•«, r„ �t +1'�LicF xr ){ )tjs^'.T" '�iR%»p s s +f%} 7`i�... +�� sl �s� y s�. �. � vYi� ,•56 SS ,,•1 .✓ 4 Y, t a,� !�. .. .*„ �' ♦ �r.y„ ; ) .1 '►�B a1X' � �,� t Rr L �t`� 1! '.y��,�5� .. 10 :��%flti `. •, 1 f ^'. Y.., ,.�"�Kc +:'A +.y a �Y` f �K r,r-.,p.E.a r4.}`7� ....�' /t fix' �y. -IN i r "��, + yT � S•aa, ,�. � +e ''t T "y ��4..rP ��r+, P'��}i�'. '�+ rt'1 ,' i �1� w „\ A xf.� e �� as sy' ,�, h �e } +} 1 1., 'r\ .' r,. ,,�, 1<. �,ii�•� - ��' � `,c�r� *i. s �' � `( - -.��,. ,..;.. �, ` �,r' "i. 1'�� t�� ,i.� P � 4j�i i.�,}v�?S ` .,irk' �.3' � {y � • ,'Y ." "" .._,_. kl- } \ � �� s� ,s _ �*. �, � •Y� � + is g, 'ash '� ' r 4 ��e. r t :.#x �Jj, ?�• + : KP,.,R,,a4 ,,.;,� ,' ,+. `h .• � � ,, } � ��;.. r � r ..l.Y'!/ � `� � ��'.'�.�y� .. -I' E,�r t Fffi i # f vrr L a s l �I e' �j ..°":/ . s w.��si � �" S ' w 4 s� '�A ,fie �. .•r"/ � a �'; � •.tip s , 104, +,p 01" �. � .i a"��f�xl•.. ?+'. �kSa.''xte ,«�. .. �. . ,°. f"r. ,�' �. `+C'+.�� z •�,.�� .-\X"4: F3'- I Z., .�f++.- � + R "AX;� � � i �Mt*'t'a r `. .3 �' � � � t � yb % q �•te.� a5 y} ,J `�I � �r� ah � e. �,�, + f ♦ . } +'�.y�;'�S ,. `� a �'�. � � . y�'F r (�+ 5.•`� � `1�.t'S°� +� ,� qJ' +AR �..'�°'"i�.-y"' S,�,� � .��''�•X •AAA �4 a�i 1' 1 r „y� �73w q �'+, �,'i'" d�L 1✓ �. w- '� � *y E. sue`^ h � i , j` r NGw Main Office 17311 —135" Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 FAX (425) 481-2510 (425) 337-1669 Snohomish County November 10, 2009 Mr. Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Geotechnical Engineering Letter Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington NGA File No. 821009 Dear Mr. Yao: Engineering -Geology Branch 437 East Penny Road Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 665-7696 FAX (509) 665 7692 NOV 1 2 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER This letter summarizes our recommendations for some tree removal at your residence located at 18430 Olympic View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. INTRODUCTION You are planning to remove four large, mature trees from your property, one which had damaged the foundation of your residence, and one that has damaged a water line. We visited the site and met with you on November 4, 2009. We observed that the front portion of your property is bowl -shaped with steep slopes on all sides. You. have requested that we observe the area and provide recommendations for removing the large trees. Site Conditions The property is a roughly rectangular -shaped lot covering approximately 0.3 acres. The front portion of the site is a bowl -shaped feature and is steeply sloping down to the west towards a flat area next to the residence. It appears that some of the slopes contain fill material from the construction of the existing driveway on the southern side of the area, and the panting pull-out area to the east. Several mature trees are located in this area in front of the house, located at the toe of the slopes; on the slopes, and at the top A\ttac-h`Ylent ` 1 7D 2 00 r ' Geotechnical Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 2 of the slopes. The trees are approximately 8 to 36 inches in diameter. The trees that are planned to be removed are. a large cedar tree located at the toe of the slope next to the northeastern corner of the residence. The second is a large cedar located within the flat area at the toe of the slopes, a fir tree located at the top of the slope, just west of the driveway pullout area, and a hemlock located at the top of slope next to the southeastern corner of the residence. The geologic units for this area- are shown on the Prelip2jM Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, by Mackey Smith (USGS, 1975). The site is mapped as Whidbey Formation (Qw) and is described as sand silt and clay. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the planned tree removal is feasible and should not adversely impact the site slopes. We recommend that the stumps remain after the trees are cut. Care should be taken as to not disturb the steep slopes during tree removal. If any areas that are disturbed should be compacted and covered with erosion control material. Disturbed areas should be planted as soon as practical and the vegetation should be maintained until it is established. In general, protection of the slopes should be performed as required by the City of Edmonds. Specifically, we recommend that the top of slope not be disturbed or modified through placement of any fill or removal of the existing vegetation. No material of any kind should be placed on the slope or be allowed to reach the slope, such as excavation spoils, lawn clippings, and other yard waste, trash, and soil stockpiles. Trees should not be cut down or removed from the slope except as described above. Any proposed development within or near the slopes should be the subject of a specific geotechnical evaluation. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to concentrate on the steep slopes. USE OF THIS LETTER NGA has prepared this report for Mr. Yutian Yao and his agents for use in the planning and budgeting for the tree removal on this site only. The scope of our work does not include services related to NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 3 constriction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 4 It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project: If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 Bala Dodoye-Alali Project Geologist a Khaled M. Shawish, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted One Figure Attached NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. e 24 _%13 •.",.-�..,� % hu,,y �P� a: �'�"�• `"`o..� � �ti�� V7 � 4..y�/ fir � y�G1 �.•�� ,may � � �.. ,�,� �� ,ss '• i,. • Z. =�XJ V 14 .A�� it 7. w �L S� r.x 0�, .. v � _ `� � lV J i �r X' � �`�{�`n�` J{• �) � Y F t�`A ,{ 'fit � Y 77 } • A "flop �, \ > 'am f A' rx }�,,• ►� t ,/�` J VA l:pk*AQVI_W `� i jyry y, sr�""' JrY 7r.'4 me A � .n ��' �`r 1 �` .r ,, a ,,�s } s.'• t �� „jf �. ,', � .�'� + , It elf ra 81. Wk w may' tt tea= i s i i ?�, �. a .�* � .'� +�• Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM December 21, 2009 Mike Clugston, Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN20090054, Tree Removal — Single Family Residence 18430 Olympic View Drive Engineering has reviewed and approved the subject application with the following condition to be noted in the staff report. Tree removal crews and associated equipment shall be staged on private property. Trees are to be dropped on private property. A right-of-way construction permit, with separate review and approval, is required to use any portion of the City right-of-way. Thank you, Jeanie City of Edmonds '1 4 0''9 �;' Nathaniel R. Brown 18529 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 �� 425-670-8062 natxcgrind@yahoo.com Mike Clugston, AICP DEC 2 1 2009 City of Edmonds Development Services PLANNING DE17",-, 121 5`h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA98020 December 18, 2009 Dear Mr. Clugston, I wish to express in the strongest possible terms my objections to the proposed tree cutting at 18430 Olympic View Drive (File No.: PLN-2009-0054). I am appalled by the steady destruction of our city's environment through the cutting of more and more trees. Our reason for moving to Edmonds in 1961 was the lovely, shady look of Edmonds — the same reason I bought my present home on Olympic View Drive. We have lost, and continue to lose at an alarming rate, a significant portion of our tree cover, with a serious negative effect on our quality of life, the habitat of our birds, and all that these trees do to retain soil, provide shade and purify the air. From my home I frequently enjoy the sight of large birds — eagles? — perching on these trees. The trees are part of their habitat, and their presence is a great pleasure to those of us who live here. We should not be eliminating still more of steadily shrinking amount of remaining habitat. The person proposing to cut these trees is required to replace them. It will take many decades for any replacements to reach the size and maturity of those to be cut. The trees in this area are a valuable part of the view. Removing no less than seven trees would greatly lessen the value of my property and undermine my enjoyment of my home. The trees in question are in a critical area. The City of Edmonds must not permit the continual erosion of our environment by granting special permission to remove these trees. If this is allowed, there is no reason why still more trees may not be removed from other critical areas. Please preserve the integrity of our city, its environment, and its wonderful atmosphere by refusing permission to eliminate still more of the trees that once made Edmonds such an attractive town. Ne . Brown Atl ai ch .":c f'•t V Page 1 of 1 Clugston, Michael From: Howard Bobry [hhbobry@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:54 AM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: file PLN-2009-0054 Mr. Clugston, We're the next door neighbors (18416 Olympic View Dr.) to the property at 18430 Olympic View, and received the Notice regarding removal of seven trees on that property. Reviewing the information shown on the permit web site, I see four trees, not seven, identified for removal, and no indentification of the other work (retaining walls, new trees, etc.) to be done. Is the information on this other work available for our inspection? We also understand that the trees to be removed had to be considered "hazardous". Is this correct? Is there documentation as to these trees (which appear to be quite healthy) being deemed hazardous? We're a bit concerned because we hate to see these big trees removed. We are also concerned that removal of one of the trees would appear to be quite difficult without access to our property, and no such permission has been given (or requested). As part of the permit process, does the City have any requirements in that regard, and any requirements for insurance or a bond in case of damage to our property? Thank you. Howard Bobry 1 /4/2010 Aflachment `;G. PDN-2009-U -) Page 1 of 1 Clugston, Michael From: John Goodman [the.goodmans@verizon.net] Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 7:06 PM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: PLN20090054 Concerns Dear Mr. Clugston: I live a 18420 Olympic View Drive. While we do applaud any of our neighbors improving and maintaining their properties, given the questionable development of 18430 Olympic View Drive to date, we do want to be sure that the City of Edmonds performs its functions. I have attached a letter listing our concerns. Thank you for addressing these issues, if they have not already been addressed. John Goodman !� I_I V •-��i J 1 /4/2010 RE: YAO PLN2009005 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA I am writing in response to the proposed approval to permit removal of trees at 18430 Olympic View Drive. In view of the history of the subject property and the proposed plans, I have major concerns that the city addresses the following issues before approval of the permit. 1. These trees and house are on a "critical area" by definition. There is a major storm sewer drain in this precise location that drains into the sound. Review of the city records and lawsuits will reveal that the City of Edmonds paid monies for damages when the subject property was incorrectly developed in the past and neighboring houses were flooded. The city must insure that this issue is properly addressed, as well as a reforestation plan and slope stabilization are in place. The City should also insure that the drainage system is not damaged. 2. A review of the certified arborist's reports, reveal only one of these trees is in poor condition, another close to the house and possibly damaging the foundation. As for the remaining trees, it is unclear that they are a danger, or that removal may be more dangerous in the "critical area". Remedies short of removal are not even offered as alternatives. It must also be acknowledged by the City the arborist's report is not independent, being from the contractor proposing the removal. While it is written by a certified arborist, should it be considered an independent arborist report? 3. Lastly, the history of this property development in recent years reveals: A.) unpermitted excavation of an onsite parking space has already occurred at this site in this very area; B.) "stop work orders" were issued by the city when unpermitted deck extensions were being made and when a swimming pool was removed without a permit; D.) on the OVD side, PUD has recently cut down trees and left the cut up limbs and tree trunks piled in the drainage area's steep slope above an inlet for the sewer. 4. Lastly, the City needs to aware that the public posting is in front of the house on the private driveway, not visible from the street, as I believe is required. It is our expectation, especially in light of the subject property's history, that the City address the issues of this "critical area" with an independent analysis of the conditions of the trees, plans to mitigate the effect on the "critical area" if trees are removed , protect the sewer drain, and assurance that the project is completed as permitted. John Goodman 18420 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA. 98020 Mike Clugston ELIZABETH POLL 18401 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 City Contact: RECEIVED 'P� 0 4 a 0ID PLANNING DEPT. Dear Sir: I am writing in concern over the requested application on the removal of seven mature trees at 18430 Olympic Drive. The site is in an identified critical area and warrants a replacement plan. How can mature trees be replaced? By 6ft saplings? My major concern is the proximity to Hut Park and an established eagle nesting area. The eagles use the mature trees on Olympic View Dr. to perch while looking for fish. More trees removed more impact on the eagles. Edmonds has lost its mature trees at an alarming rate and at this critical time of climate change and carbon credits our few remaining native trees should surely be regarded as valuable assets to our community. Yours truly Elizabeth Poll 4zs- �T 3-' 1003 i'1', t o k, i I m p , f . N 22 r 1 0 9 �},7; ! r . - E ƒ 2 Cu | Z �| ©� ■ ®, � _ - / � ! _ ■ i`� § - , U ƒ !® | # , \§ �� - � c � � / ` t 2 6 2 < U m yAachmenl;§ @LR- 20g-023« CITY C EDMONDS • 121 5`h AVENUE NORTH ,DMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: 425.771.0220 • FAX: 425.771.0221 • WEB: www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING • BUILDING December 14, 2009 Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: COMPLETE APPLICATION — TREE CUTTING PERMIT AT 18430 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE (PLN-2009-0054) Dear Mr. Yao: Thank you for submitting the required tree hazard survey forms; your application is now complete. As we had discussed at the counter, applicants are now responsible for all notification requirements for land use applications according to ECDC 20.03 (Ordinance No. 3736). This includes mailing out the notice materials to adjacent property owners, publishing notice in the Everett Herald, and posting the site itself. Notice for this project must issued by Monday, December 28`"; in this case, you should be able to do it by Tuesday, December 22, 2009. With this cover letter is: 1) a notice of application, 2) legal notice for the Herald, 3) a vicinity map, and 4) affidavits of posting, publishing and mailing. The notice of application and vicinity map must be mailed to the property owners within 300 feet of the subject site and posted on the sign at the site. Please use the following address for the return address on the envelopes for the mailing: City of Edmonds, Planning Division, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. In addition to using this address for the return address, please also mail a copy of the notice to my attention at the same address. When you mail the notices at the Post Office, you will need to obtain a U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing containing the names and addresses of all parties provided notice. While you can send the information out before December 28`h, sending it out later could be a basis for denial or appeal of the application. The attached legal notice must be provided to the Everett Herald by 3:001)m two business days prior to publication. In addition to the provided text, the Herald will need your name for billing as well as your phone number and address. You can submit the ad to the Herald in any of the following ways: 1) via email to legals@heraldnet.com (a confirmation email will be sent within 24 hours of receipt), 2) via fax to 425-339-3438, 3) in person at 1213 California St, Everett, WA 98201, or 4) by mail to PO Box 930, Everett, WA 98206 attn: Legals. If you have any questions for the Herald, you may contact Jody Knoblich at 425-339-3089 or legals@heraldnet.com. A laminated notice and vicinity map must be attached to a blue sign and be posted at the site by Tuesday, December 22, 2009. The laminated documents and blue sign are available at the Planning Division. 05 No later than 14 days after the required date of posting, publishing, and mailing (December 22nd), an affidavit must be submitted to the City attesting that you completed each of the required methods of notification. Additionally, you will need to submit the U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing for each of the addresses the notice of application was mailed to. You can drop those documents by City Hall or mail them to my attention. If you have any questions on the noticing requirements, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or via email at michael.clu ston ,ci.edmonds.wa.us. We are still working out how to smoothly implement these new noticing procedures, so we are happy to help if you have any difficulties. Sincerely, Mike Clugston, AICP Planner Enclosures I C a) O O CVO U N N O Co E o U � N .Q 0 � U O a) o z E z a� O0 O L.L a) Chi 00 O z CD c cn I Q E U vi a a U U Q E CD C C Q) N � V NO O N O C C {-.+ 0 C C 0 tmco En CO cn "0 O ��c U oti cu L C --. C Y C Y O U O N O Y_ � 04 N 0 C 0 O= U U C :D C ::D L C Q U cu C E L Q) 0 C : O m cu E O cu cu N CD Y N Q E a) -0 z% a) " U -0 C o C a 4-- >> E N O a) O W N U C O O U) ; n a a� o -0 a� o U o a n -_ CL C � U U � CD a Q O >. OY tY0 U a) _ D A cu .0 cn C Cu -O c ry a`) a) > Q� CM q %i > N _� .0 U)cn cr a) 0 L N a2 .�_ •N O > p�F-�'C .�--+ C — cu N m C- ^ — cu a _—�CD 0 0 = o�N CL (D 0 CV C4 U_ O U O C a Q (n . O �` �. C cu >- a) -0 CD -0 O cu vi LL 2 C E E cu Rs U > 0 Q� rna`� cd O a) ap Q c Q Q 2 cn — N cu CD- Q o 0 0 0 0 C O O U cu O p Q 0- = Ucu om U �' cu U C 0 cn o Q Q Q� -1 a) o O O Q Q U a) U E Ecu cu cu Z 0 o U li li 0 E 0 c �L cv N o u > U 4 'b y O O N p O O � y +� U �. o �UU� o cu Q y o EA 0 cn y QCd > O E O N cn ao O <++ c�/� 'b N�• w �+ O cn Z y Li Ucu a N >1 o cd y O Ca N O f1' p � ° N 00 C U � o -cn^ U r O OU O c • � W y ° N cCS + p Q z cz ° > + "d •� N p7S > N p 0 >cl O OU p 4r 03 . r+ cn to >, U +� bA Qon z o a o ai U b FILE NO.: PLN-2009-0054 APPLICANT: Yao RECEIVED- NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT JAN - 5 29113 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PERMIT CGU�,,i "-'� STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I, yWrW V40 , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the /ram day of ��£-`I, the attached Notice of Application was posted on or near the subject property, in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03. Signed x '74,*,Z� Subscribed and sworn to before me this r day of !0f-a Notary Public C State of Washington Notary Public in and f the State of Washington. MICHAEL E MCENTIRE My Appointment Expires May 2.2013 Residing at File Number: PLN-2009-0054 Applicant: Yao NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED JAN - 5 2010 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PERMIT COUNTER STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I, �� 774-1 yAb , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the/J day of the attached Notice of Development Application was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this ij day of Notary Public State of E MCE TIR ota Public in and fo he State of Washington. ton MICHAEL E MCENTIRE ry g My Appointment Expires May 2, 2013 Residing at FILE NO.: PLN-2009-0054 APPLICANT: Yao NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I, �419 , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: RECEIVD JAN 4 5;, PERMIT COUNT E - That on the IS' day of 1 caused to be published in the Everett Herald a legal Notice of Application, in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03, a copy of which is attached. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of /1-2a4'"%- Notary Public State of Washington MICHAEL E MCENTIRE My Appointment Expires May 2, 2013 ota Publi6 in nd for the State of Washington. Residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH !.NOTICE OF DEVELC?MENT APPLICATION NAWQFAPPUCAftTL Yutian Yao DAT !,DAOFKM)GATION: 11/12/09 Oil COMPLETE SS: 12/14/09 DATE OF N T ICS `'. 12/22/09 FILE NO %A4 + *v &+ PLN-2009.0054 PROJECT LOCATION,,:,,, 18430 Olympic View Drive, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds, WA AppBcantis proposing to remove seven trees at the referenced site. - The pares is zoned Residential Single Family (RS,12). Tree cutting permits are Type II permits. Because the site is in an Identified critical area, a replacement plan is required. REQUESTED PERMIT:: Conditional Use Permit - Tree Cutting- Information on this appli- cation can be viewed at the City of Edmonds Development Ser- vices Dept 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Unknown. REQUIRED STUDIES: Unknown. - EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Arborist report, Critical Area Checklist. COMMENT PERIOD: Comments due by January 6, 2010. Any person has the right to I comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open re- cord pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the protect permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to Initiate an administrative appeal. CITY CONTACT:, Mike Clugston, AICP 425-771-0220 Published: December 18, 2009. 'N' EC�a D JAN 04 2010 EliI OND Ci'i 'CLERK Account Name: Yao Yutian Affidavit of Publication S.S. The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice Notice of Application Yutian Yao a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: December 18, 2009 and that said newspaper was Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of December, 2009 Notary Public 1 and or the Stata* d County. Ott b -- of A, 9) ! i _ Account Number: 21 Svc'�to OF Y'!AS?�.`� litt`,�54 ,,,.. bers during all of said period. Pnnctpal Cler 18th at Everett, Snohomish r` s Number: 0001679041 Storm Lake Growers, Inc. Invoice --- M 0 SR 203 Monroe, WA 98272 360-794-4842 Phone 360-794-8323 Fax Bill To Counter Sales Ship To Date Invoice # 10/27/2010 10-881 P.O. Number Terms Rep Ship Via F.O.B. Project COD 10/27/2010 Pick Up Quantity Item Code Description Price Each Amount 6 THUPLBB Cedar B&B 30.00 180.00T 8 ACECIBB VIne Maple B&B 30.00 240.00T Sales Tax 8.00% 33.60 DEVELOP4 SOU Fq RVIC" Total $453.60 s W I orth r is f 7-11 s •. r i • ,--r t y ,1 'I -� ice,, ., 9 r ._ •. _,... J scale: Site Plan Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds r is o : ; ... Holly Iosso P\ #6278 A Page 1 ci3°r-: • March 11. ?():(() t 1 I� e 1058 N. 39th. Street 1 O ii Ir 1111 p I' C Seattle, WA 3 206-528-4670 Consulting ArLyr -fists Ah Ah Existing # Vegetation Botanical Name Common Name Size (inches diameter measured 4.5 feet above ground) 1 Pseudotsrrga men_iesii Douglas -fir 37 24, 6 REMOVED 5 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 7 Alnus rubra Red alder 4, 8, 10 (separate stems) 8 Primus hisitanica Portuguese laurel Multi -stem 9 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 12 10 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 11 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 7 12 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 6 13 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 14 Corylus cornrrta Beaked hazelnut Multi -stem 15 Abies grandis Grand fir 21 16 Pseudotsuga men_iesii Douglas -fir 47.5 17 Cornus nutalii Pacific dogwood 15 18 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 19 Coryhts cornuta Beaked hazelnut Multi -stem Plant Schedule Quantity Botanical Name Common Name Size Spacing 8 Acer circinatum Vine maple > 1 inch caliper 8 feet on cen- ter 6 Thijapficata Western red cedar > 6 feet height 12 feet on center TOTAL: 14 �cF�V COUN�R��CEs Plant Schedule Page 2 of 2 Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds Holly Iosso PN #6298A March 11, 2010 � 1058 N. 39th. St Seattle, WA 98103 O 0 E LA rti N 4— S o tf— (-A-nr?SC a pingnC 1495 Goat Trail Loop Rd Mukilteo, WA 98275 Name / Address Yao Yutian 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, Wa 98020 Estimate Date Estimate # 3/18/2010 3 Project Item Description Qty Rate Total TREE REPLACEMENT: 3 way topsoil For pocket planting. 3 way topsoil. measured in cubic 1 24.95 24.95T yards. Plants For 14 trees to be determined. 14 36.75 514.50T Stakes For tree stakes. 14 6.00 84.00T 1600 SOFTSCAP... To pick up, deliver, and plant 14 trees, then stake them. 0.5 560.00 280.00T 903.45 Sales Tax 9.50% 85.83 R�CE� ,ti►n�� 01201 rs Thank you for the opportunity to quote this. Total $98928 a 1� RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2010 k iEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER i, } North ' scale: C _ -7. o' O,� �s �, �-1 C� -i (2-e t aPPR �a QN' 1 N NG Site Plan Yutian Yao Y 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds �� 1058 N. 39th. Street I Q �I 11 s 206-528 4670 3 arbor ist: HolivlossoP\ #6278.1 consulting Page 1 of 0" d a t c: March 11. 2010 A r b o r' s t s - # Botanical Name Common Name Size (inches diameter measured 4.5 feet above ground) 1 Pseudotsuga men_iesii Douglas -fir 37 24, 6 REMOVED 5 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 7 Alnus rubra Red alder 4, 8, 10 (separate stems) 8 Prunus hrsitanica Portuguese laurel Multi -stem 9 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 12 10 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 11 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 7 12 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 6 13 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 14 Coryluus cornuuta Beaked hazelnut Multi -stem 15 Abies grandis Grand fir 21 16 Pseudotsuga men.iesii Douglas -fir 47.5 17 Cornus nuutalii Pacific dogwood 15 18 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock 8 k9 Corylus cornuta Beaked hazelnut Multi -stem Quantity Botanical Name Common Name Size spacing 8 Acer circinanum Vine maple > 1 inch caliper 8 feet on cen- ter 6 Thuja plicata Western red cedar > 6 feet height 12 feet on center TOTAL: 14 Plant Schedule Page 2of2 Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds arborist: Holly Iosso PN #6298A date: March 11,2010 > , , T r=e��a „t�,� ,�=J�> 1058 N. 39th. St pp� =ppp Inc" Seattle, WA 98103 SU��UIIS® c o n s u l t i n g A r b o r i s t s • • GREEN4LSLATE landscaping, Inca 1495 Goat Trail Loop Rd Mukilteo, WA 98275 I Name / Address Yao Yutian 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, Wa 98020 Estimate Date Estimate # 3/18/2010 3 Project Item Description Qty Rate Total TREE REPLACEMENT: 3 way topsoil For pocket planting. 3 way topsoil. measured in cubic 1 24.95 24.95T yards. Plants For 14 trees to be determined. 14 36.75 514.50T Stakes For tree stakes. 14 6.00 84.00T 1600 SOFTSCAP... To pick up, deliver, and plant 14 trees, then stake them. 0.5 560.00 280.00T 903.45 Sales Tax 9.500/0 85.83 Thank you for the opportunity to quote this. Total $989.28 RECEIVE® r 1 FEB ] p, 2010 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS pEVEWMENT SEMACES 121 Fifth Ave. No 98020 COUNTER Edmonds, W�shingto BALD EAGLE NEST SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Amendment #1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH RCW 77.12.655 AND WAC 232-12-292 TERRITORY NAME: H(TrT PARK 517-2 Applicant Site Location Pending activity Yutian Yao and Lilin Wu 18430 Olympic View Drive Tree removal Drive Olympic View Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION The subject parcel is located within 800' of Hutt Park bald eagle nest #517-2. The project will remove trees that are damaging the house foundation. This plan does not ensure compliance with other federal, state, or local laws. The following conditions are required under RCW 77.12.655 or WAC 232-12-292. CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to protect bald eagles and their habitat: 1) Trees #2 and #3 (shown below) are authorized for removal. Tree #2 is 43" at breast and 75' tall; #3 is 44" and 70' tall DURATION OF PROTECTION This plan applies to the landowner who signs the plan. Since eagles return to the same traditional use areas each year, the conditions of this plan shall apply indefinitely, unless a breeding territory has been unoccupied for 5 consecutive years. Please contact WDFW if the eagles change nest location or territory use. Do not assume that the conditions of this plan no longer apply. REVIEW AND AMENDMENT This plan will be subject to the following review and amendment procedures. The plan may be reviewed periodically by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the landowner to determine whether: 1) the plan requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances; or, 2) the terms of the plan comply with applicable laws and regulations; or, 3) the parties to the plan are complying with its terms. HAZARDOUS TREES Except for a tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals, a report from a certified arborist, indicating the health of the tree and the need to remove the tree, shall be submitted to WDFW prior to cutting the hazardous tree. APPEAL PROCEDURE In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292 (7.1)-(7.3), the landowner may request a formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW, and the Model Rules of Procedure, Chapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed with the Department within 20 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal request shall clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for the appeal. Yu Tian Yao 17 February 2010 COMPLIANCE Failure to comply with this plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. This plan does not ensure compliance with other federal, state, or local laws. This plan assumes compliance with any previous bald eagle management plan for this parcel when owned by current landowner. This plan applies only to the proposed land use listed above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the landowner's responsibility to notify the Department of any new proposed land use activities. If the plan is acceptable, sign and return original signature page only to WDFW at address below. WDFW Approval Ruth L. Milner Landowner Approval Landowner or Agent signature (circle one) District Wildlife Biologist Date: Z/fig /Zvi O Date: February 17, 2010 7 Please return a signed copy to: Landowner r Agent t,Pnnt\edd Name YUIAiV Y/T Ruth Milner PO Box 1100 Landown r or Agent Address: La Conner, WA 98257 Yu Tian Yao 17 February 2010 Dec 08 09 08:39a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.20 PROPOSAL IV w a h i n' gto n Tree'Experts rw 9792 Edmonds Way Su!te #123 Edmonds WA. 98020 ofTice:206-362-3380 * 425-771-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed. IDt ?1-2007614 — U8I # 601-960-331 — $2,000,000 Liability Coverage — Contractor # washite926mn- Subn*bedTo: j atimateDace raneorEsdmate ReAmmx Lilin Wu I 8-4-09 1 ILL I rbs-aa67 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Phona a 920-698-2229 j BID We hereby Propose to fumish material and labor to oomplete the work outlined here In for the sum of: I plus sales tax Added info Minm@gmail.eom We accept ai/mafor credit cards vanamm from ME Proposal N. a!teratim requiring extra labs or material will be perfomred only upon written order and billed in additicn tc the sum covered by this conbac. Agremw is made with our foremen are re ognaai Ne emary Pemits are r gxrty «' S TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON 308 COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS Nar PAID WnMN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE %ILL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS S EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED 306 WILL BE BILLED AND DUE Vl MN 30 DAYS OFTHE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED 308 DATE. - ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above soecificatlans, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (1)(tve) hereby authorize the performance of thi 6imatOr CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONTRACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY 15 SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER W Yu Tian Yao 17 February 2010 FILE NO.: PLN-2009-0054 APPLICANT: Yao RECEIVE NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT JAi\! _ 5 2010 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PERMIT COU?41"71 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) 1, �W rW V40 , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the /ram day of Pt4£,*X` 2411, the attached Notice of Application was posted on or near the subject property, in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03. Signed x Subscribed and sworn to before me this % day of£/L Notary Public state of Washington Notary Public in and f# the State of Washington. MICHAEL E MCENnRE My Appointment Expires May 2, 2013 Residing at File Number: PLN-2009-0054 Applicant: Yao NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) JAN - 5 2010 PERMIT COUNTER I, y�lj-74'J L4 b , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the�S-/ day of ,�r�^JSz �J, the attached Notice of Development Application was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03. Signed *I -- Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary PubAc State of Washington ota Public id fo he State of Washington. MICHAEL E MCE"RE ry n ang My Appointment Expires May 2, 2013 Residing at • FILE NO.: PLN-2009-0054 APPLICANT: Yao NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I, �Lt,24-J yA� , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: JAN - 5f1s� PERMIT COUNTE.-9 That on the ISM day of �; 1 caused to be published in the Everett Herald a legal Notice of Application, In accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03, a copy of which is attached. Signed � '?' Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public State of Washington MICHAEL E MCENTIRE My Appointment Expires May 2, 2013 ota Publi6 in Ad for the State of Washington. Residing at look, AMW STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH NOTICE OF DEVELCWENT APPLICATION 'NAM OF,AP LWAN,% Yutian Yao 13AT �� Tte ESS: 12/14/09 DATE'mfNO ICI�i` ` ` 12/22/09 FILE"NO.: PLN-2009w0054 PRCJECT,LOCATION`. 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is proposing to remove seven trees at the referenced site. The parcel Is zoned Residential Single Family (RS-12). Tree cutting permits are Type II permits. Because the site is in an identified critical area, a replacement plan is required. REQUESTED PERMIT: Conditional Use Permit - Tree Cutting Information on this appli- cation can be viewed at the City of Edmonds Development Ser- vices Dept., 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Unknown. REQUIRED STUDIES: Unknown. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Arborist report, Critical Area Checklist. COMMENT PERIOD: Comments due by January 6, 2010. Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open re- cord pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. CITY CONTACT: Mike Cluggston, AICP 425-771-0220 Published: December 18, 2009. Affidavit of Publication S.S. The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice Notice of Application Yutian Yao a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: December 18, 2009 and that said newspaper was during all of said period. i Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th E'C-" "TWED day of December, 2009 JAN Q 4 2010 ��gg{��ii((�� (7 g pT� Notary Public and or the St tB' i at Everett, Snohomish Eli'iYtVNDS O"'1 �i.'M County. _ flay, �s. �i Account Name: Yao Yutian Account Number: 216J01,'/,, UB\' "S,`er Number: 0001679041 tli OFYdP��`. l�ltta.; • Mike Clugston ELIZABETH POLL 18401 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 City Contact: 'RECEIVE® '00& 0 4 901D PLANNING DEPT. Dear Sir: I am writing in concern over the requested application on the removal of seven mature trees at 18430 Olympic Drive. The site is in an identified critical area and warrants a replacement plan. How can mature trees be replaced? By 6ft saplings? My major concern is the proximity to Hut Park and an established eagle nesting area. The eagles use the mature trees on Olympic View Dr. to perch while looking for fish. More trees removed more impact on the eagles. Edmonds has lost its mature trees at an alarming rate and at this critical time of climate change and carbon credits our few remaining native trees should surely be regarded as valuable assets to our community. Yours truly Elizabeth Poll 4zs- 7T'-- 1003 Page 1 of 1 Clugston, Michael From: John Goodman [the.goodmans@verizon.net] Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 7:06 PM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: PLN20090054 Concerns Dear Mr. Clugston: I live a 18420 Olympic View Drive. While we do applaud any of our neighbors improving and maintaining their properties, given the questionable development of 18430 Olympic View Drive to date, we do want to be sure that the City of Edmonds performs its functions. I have attached a letter listing our concerns. Thank you for addressing these issues, if they have not already been addressed. John Goodman 1 /4/2010 • 0 RE: YAO PLN2009005 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA I am writing in response to the proposed approval to permit removal of trees at 18430 Olympic View Drive. In view of the history of the subject property and the proposed plans, I have major concerns that the city addresses the following issues before approval of the permit. 1. These trees and house are on a "critical area" by definition. There is a major storm sewer drain in this precise location that drains into the sound. Review of the city records and lawsuits will reveal that the City of Edmonds paid monies for damages when the subject property was incorrectly developed in the past and neighboring houses were flooded. The city must insure that this issue is properly addressed, as well as a reforestation plan and slope stabilization are in place. The City should also insure that the drainage system is not damaged. 2. A review of the certified arborist's reports, reveal only one of these trees is in poor condition, another close to the house and possibly damaging the foundation. As for the remaining trees, it is unclear that they are a danger, or that removal may be more dangerous in the "critical area". Remedies short of removal are not even offered as alternatives. It must also be acknowledged by the City the arborist's report is not independent, being from the contractor proposing the removal. While it is written by a certified arborist, should it be considered an independent arborist report? 3. Lastly, the history of this property development in recent years reveals: A.) unpermitted excavation of an onsite parking space has already occurred at this site in this very area; B.) "stop work orders" were issued by the city when unpermitted deck extensions were being made and when a swimming pool was removed without a permit; D.) on the OVD side, PUD has recently cut down trees and left the cut up limbs and tree trunks piled in the drainage area's steep slope above an inlet for the sewer. 4. Lastly, the City needs to aware that the public posting is in front of the house on the private driveway, not visible from the street, as I believe is required. It is our expectation, especially in light of the subject property's history, that the City address the issues of this "critical area" with an independent analysis of the conditions of the trees, plans to mitigate the effect on the "critical area" if trees are removed , protect the sewer drain, and assurance that the project is completed as permitted. John Goodman 18420 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA. 98020 Page 1 of 1 U Clugston, Michael From: Howard Bobry [hhbobry@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:54 AM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: file PLN-2009-0054 Mr. Clugston, We're the next door neighbors (18416 Olympic View Dr.) to the property at 18430 Olympic View, and received the Notice regarding removal of seven trees on that property. Reviewing the information shown on the permit web site, I see four trees, not seven, identified for removal, and no indentification of the other work (retaining walls, new trees, etc.) to be done. Is the information on this other work available for our inspection? We also understand that the trees to be removed had to be considered "hazardous". Is this correct? Is there documentation as to these trees (which appear to be quite healthy) being deemed hazardous? We're a bit concerned because we hate to see these big trees removed. We are also concerned that removal of one of the trees would appear to be quite difficult without access to our property, and no such permission has been given (or requested). As part of the permit process, does the City have any requirements in that regard, and any requirements for insurance or a bond in case of damage to our property? Thank you. Howard Bobry 1 /4/2010 • Nathaniel R Brown 0 18529 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 425-670-8062 natxcgrind@yahoo.com Mike Clugston, AICP City of Edmonds Development Services 121 5'h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA98020 Dear Mr. Clugston, DEC 2 1 2009 PLANNING DEFT December 18, 2009 I wish to express in the strongest possible terms my objections to the proposed tree cutting at 18430 Olympic View Drive (File No.: PLN-2009-0054). I am appalled by the steady destruction of our city's environment through the cutting of more and more trees. Our reason for moving to Edmonds in 1961 was the lovely, shady look of Edmonds — the same reason I bought my present home on Olympic View Drive. We have lost, and continue to lose at an alarming rate, a significant portion of our tree cover, with a serious negative effect on our quality of life, the habitat of our birds, and all that these trees do to retain soil, provide shade and purify the air. From my home I frequently enjoy the sight of large birds — eagles? — perching on these trees. The trees are part of their habitat, and their presence is a great pleasure to those of us who live here. We should not be eliminating still more of steadily shrinking amount of remaining habitat. The person proposing to cut these trees is required to replace them. It will take many decades for any replacements to reach the size and maturity of those to be cut. The trees in this area are a valuable part of the view. Removing no less than seven trees would greatly lessen the value of my property and undermine my enjoyment of my home. The trees in question are in a critical area. The City of Edmonds must not permit the continual erosion of our environment by granting special permission to remove these trees. If this is allowed, there is no reason why still more trees may not be removed from other critical areas. Please preserve the integrity of our city, its environment, and its wonderful atmosphere by refusing permission to eliminate still more of the trees that once made Edmonds such an attractive town. Yo , athanie . Brown Clugston, Michael From: Sent: To: Subject: Good afternoon Mr. Yao, Clugston, Michael Monday, December 14, 2009 5:16 PM 'Yao Yutian' Complete application - PLN-2009-0054 Thank you for submitting the tree hazard forms the other day. Your application is now complete (see attached). A hard copy of the letter will follow. Also attached is the Notice of Application that must be sent to the neighbors within 300' (along with the map) and the Notice that must be sent to the Everett Herald. This information must be sent out by December 28 but I thought you would want to do it sooner than that so I've dated the notices for December 22. If that is a problem, please let me know. Please read the 'complete' letter carefully as it describes what you need to do to provide notice. Within the next few days, you'll want to contact the Everett Herald and stop by the Planning Division to pick up a blue sign and laminated notice and map. If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Mike Clugston, AICP Planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department P: 425-771-0220 1 F: 425-771-0221 michael.clugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us WFUI iJ ,Not �3-4�LDA�LDX PLN-2009-0054 PLN-2009-0054 Zoning and Vicinity PLN-09-54 Affidavit PLN-09-54 Affidavit PLN-09-54 Affidavit Notice of Applic... Legal Notice.doc... map.pdf (3... of Mailing... of Posting... of Publica... CITY *EDMONDS • 121 5`h AVENUE NORTAMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: 425.771.0220 • FAX: 425.771.0221 • WEB: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING • BUILDING December 14, 2009 Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: COMPLETE APPLICATION — TREE CUTTING PERMIT AT 18430 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE (PLN-2009-0054) Dear Mr. Yao: Thank you for submitting the required tree hazard survey forms; your application is now complete. As we had discussed at the counter, applicants are now responsible for all notification requirements for land use applications according to ECDC 20.03 (Ordinance No. 3736). This includes mailing out the notice materials to adjacent property owners, publishing notice in the Everett Herald, and posting the site itself. Notice for this project must issued by Monday, December 28`h; in this case, you should be able to do it by Tuesday, December 22, 2009. With this cover letter is: 1) a notice of application, 2) legal notice for the Herald, 3) a vicinity map, and 4) affidavits of posting, publishing and mailing. The notice of application and vicinity map must be mailed to the property owners within 300 feet of the subject site and posted on the sign at the site. Please use the following address for the return address on the envelopes for the mailing: City of Edmonds, Planning Division, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. In addition to using this address for the return address, please also mail a copy of the notice to my attention at the same address. When you mail the notices at the Post Office, you will need to obtain a U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing containing the names and addresses of all parties provided notice. While you can send the information out before December 28`h, sending it out later could be a basis for denial or appeal of the application. The attached legal.notice must be provided to the Everett Herald by 3:001)m two business days prior to publication. In addition to the provided text, the Herald will need your name for billing as well as your phone number and address. You can submit the ad to the Herald in any of the following ways: 1) via email to legals@heraldnet.com (a confirmation email will be sent within 24 hours of receipt), 2) via fax to 425-339-3438, 3) in person at 1213 California St, Everett, WA 98201, or 4) by mail to PO Box 930, Everett, WA 98206 attn: Legals. If you have any questions for the Herald, you may contact Jody Knoblich at 425-339-3089 or legals@heraldnet.com. A laminated notice and vicinity map must be attached to a blue sign and be posted at the site by Tuesday, December 22, 2009. The laminated documents and blue sign are available at the Planning Division. No later than 14 days after the required date of posting, publishing, and mailing (December 22nd), an affidavit must be submitted to the City attesting that you completed each of the required methods of notification. Additionally, you will need to submit the U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing for each of the addresses the notice of application was mailed to. You can drop those documents by City Hall or mail them to my attention. If you have any questions on the noticing requirements, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or via email at michael.clu sg tongci.edmonds.wa.us. We are still working out how to smoothly implement these new noticing procedures, so we are happy to help if you have any difficulties. Sincerely, Mike Clugston, AICP Planner Enclosures O CL N E O O OC) U N � N C:) (a O 0O E O = O Ca N CV U •Q Q Z Q U � CL O a 0Z E Z a� 0 p LL > a) N (u C) 0 W U Z � o 'C'scu F- p W Q N Q 3 . O O N U Uj o O C)p � Fr U Q r � o U \J .� N -Ea C:)o I Q a� O m a O.UO N N O bpw�� OC" O c .= 0 c_ 7:$ 1.0'b OO a) Q) Y Qy> O UU > > QU c)zt�+. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 V }' u O v O O vi cd �, � m > p Cd E C:3 cu E .� U. O ° 0 -0 c ate_ E Cz �; a°i oo u 0 E cn (n o o a o N E o o H U mN �� -o wecu o Q CU .Q �, (D o o a`� n' = U " ° ° ai o a� �a o CD a 0� �.o � � +� U " o 0 ° °? � cu � U) _•o �¢ C•� ��a� ��. 04CD mc=a cn�°_' > N C:'� 'O O '� E ° E o W o .N a>-� o a) ... � /}�/ rn Q— t Q Z 7O � E {_I W .O ai iV+l '✓ •rl CDE CD O L V) � ~ i'I ISti • .� CV N U O (6 v a) N O In m kn O �' C cu E O E N o CM CU_ 2 - � O °'d.> > V O 9p a d`? q Q cu N y" y C Q' 0 0 0 0 tE 4° to Q C O O �- U v co o o bA a Q iu � cu L) .. cd ... 0 3 b O a Q Q O Q J Q p , O a)cw O O O ti , U E aa)) a)a(Di ai � b z 0 D U d cd THIS IS A LEGAL OERTISEMENT AND SHOULD BE_BILLE_A_TH CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NAME OF APPLICANT: Yutian Yao DATE OF APPLICATION: 11/12/09 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 12/14/09 DATE OF NOTICE: 12/22/09 FILE NO.: PLN-2009-0054 PROJECT LOCATION: 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is proposing to remove seven trees at the referenced site. The parcel is zoned Residential Single Family (RS-12). Tree cutting permits are Type II permits. Because the site is in an identified critical area, a replacement plan is required. REQUESTED PERMIT: Conditional Use Permit - Tree Cutting. Information on this application can be viewed at the City of Edmonds Development Services Dept., 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Unknown. REQUIRED STUDIES: Unknown. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Arborist report, Critical Area Checklist. COMMENT PERIOD: Comments due by January 6, 2010. Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open record pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP 425-771-0220 PUBLISH: 12/16/09 Dec 08 09 08:31a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.1 October 30, 2009 Client: Location: RE: removal. Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way #123 Edmonds, WA 98020 206-362-3380 staff washin tontreeex erts.com Mr. and Mrs. Wu 19430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA PLANNING; DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS 121 Fifth A". No. Edmonds, Washington 98020 RECEIVE[) DEC 0 8 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Tree identification and hazard evaluation to satisfy permit requirements for Tree 1: Doug Fir (pseudotsuga menziesii) DBH = 37" approx height = 95' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 3 and 4) Observations: -tree has been wind topped . -there is restricted root zone due to paving and grade -tree is stand alone in prevailing wind Tree 2: Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) DBH = 42" approx height = 75' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 5 and 6) Tree 3: Western Red Cedar (Thuia plicata) DBH = 44" approx height = 70' Observations: (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 7 and 8) -tree is 6" to 12" away from house -there is root interference with the foundation of the home -root pruning is not recommended as it can compromise the structural integrity of the tree Tree 4: Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) DBH = 12" approx height = 35' Observations: -tree is too close to house -tree has multiple co -dominant thinks increasing risk of failure Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.2 Tree 5: Hemlock DBH = 8" approx height = 25' Tree 6: Western Dogwood (Comus nutalii) DBH = 2 trunks @ 8" each approx height = 20' Observations: -one trunk has fallen into a neighboring tree -tree has significant rot at the base and should be removed Trees 7: Group of Alder (Alms rubra) DBH =10", 8", and 4" approx height=15-25' Prepared by Jennifer Wells Certified Consulting Arborist PN #6209A RECEIVED DEC 06 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Waiver of LiaNity This information represents the tree health assessment at this point in time. My findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of fttture events, lttfwmation contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time Of inspection. The inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible item without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. 2 Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 .04EE ASSESSMENT FAM All s ctions of this form must he i,-- core fetI by a gualified , t (A hazard tree must have a target within t .5x the height of the tres.) Site/Address: 1 0 ,i w (fir Map/Location: 41v- p.3 IVE DEC 0 8 2009 DEVELOPMENT Rrowip r Owner: public: private_,___ unknown other COUNTER D Date: 1 % 3D. 0 j Name of Tree Assessor. JQ0 n n 1 �2v o lSi4++ Other Professional Certificates and Qualifications 'FREE CHARACTERISTICS -tree fi `` Species Dom: � 71 s HeighL- of trunks: 1 _,/ Spread: O Form: Ugenemny symmetric kminorasymrrte-ly Oslurnp sprout Ustag-headed Crown Class: dominant ❑ co -dominant C inteimed?ate 0 suppressed Live crov.n ratio: 46a% Age class: Clyoung O semrmature Xrrrature Oover-matruslsenescent Pruning History: Ocrown cleaned 0 woessively thinned Olopped )6Grown rai_--d rJpollarded Ocrown reduced Crush cuts ❑cebted/oraced ❑ none ❑ Ind ipie pruning events A plxox. dares: Special Vahre: ❑specimen ❑heritageRr stnric Ocn7dU-.e ❑unusual ❑street tree ❑screen pshads genous Qprolected ov by g agency. TREE HEALTH Foliage CoverAor. mal ❑ctuoniconecrotic E,3icormies?�Y 1V frowth obstructions - Foliage Density: 2!�Spnnal ❑sparse heat sR.4nprma ❑small (]stakes Ow'v'erties Osigns ❑eaWes annual shoot grax-th:0exce;leMXAverage ❑poor Twig otehack? Y t0 ❑ curb:paverert q guards Woorcla ddevelopment:❑excellert� Vigardassverage0poor ❑npne then (2LA,/Q f)LJg4nA- ❑exrelfent �,tiverago ❑ Wr r7poor Major pestsldeaasen; � 6� SITE CONDITIONS Site Chester,resldence ❑ cotraneretaf Qindustrtal i�parK Copen space ❑ natu.w �O w+wdMandltert '� t_aadscape typ_ o parkway ❑ raised bed C7 cat irler L7 mound O horn ❑ shnrh border ❑ rrH d txeak 11r'igation: 'one ❑ adequate ❑ inad inadequate e4 O excessbne ❑trunk wetted Hecent site disturbance? Y 0 0 construction D soil disturbance ❑ $cede change !] line clearng ❑ site denrina ?h dripline paved: 011i 10-25% 299s ;g-7553 75-100%v t''avementlited? (DN J. ttnplme wrtio soil Q`Yu 25)5 25-50 i 50-754f 75-1i]D56 % driptina grade lowan M 016 SO-25 23-S095 0-759F 75-1009u Sol problems: 0 drainage ❑shallow Ccompacted Gdroughty ❑mine Oal PJine ❑ addic C srnal! volume gdisease center 0history of fall Ocray ❑ expansive ------�._? C aspect: Cttrstnuctions: []tights E]signago Oline-of-site OVew Ocverheadlines ❑under rounduti.'ities Exposure to wind- 0 single We 0 betovJ C traf is Gadp,Cent veg. CL_ i Y t3 above canopy ^n=certtfy ex rosedAwirtdv M canopy edge 'C area prane to windthrovj i'revailing wind direction: , Occurrence of--o-tree stomas C never )64aldon7 Q regu:eriy TARGET Use UriderTree:i ��parkirg C trsffit ❑ r, .. ""tea P�Cc �n��,rt,:rcw.-i;an ❑Ia;,dsGapa DtrarYscc-pa ❑snau'a&Z;ircS r7iriJliiyi7ri6 Can tnrgol be mored? Y N Can use be feslncted7 v ; `'yJ uccupe=y: u Dotes opal use U' irAemti'taw 1' =a Cfreguent use /}�onsant use Dec 08 09 08:32a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.4 RECEIVE DEC 0 8 2009 TREE DEFECTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - - OUNTER ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect rout rot: Y a ``MIushroQnVcc-WK1t racket present Y osett7 Fxpd roatc ❑ 20"We moderate ❑ bw Underrdi, Elsovere crate Olow Rootpruned: Root areaafCecteck "6 Buttress wounded: Y© N Wh"/ en: _ Reeldctedroot area: psevere —�Wnodr-rate ploy, PctentizIfor mot farlim. Clsevere�todemte ❑Ioa LEAN. deg. tram vertical []natural ❑unnatural ❑ seif-ccrmcted Soa heaving: Decoy in ptana of ban: Y �t !% Roots broken Y N Soa a2cwng: Y GD Compounding factors: Lean severity: 13 severe ❑ motierats U tow CROWN DE'FFM Indicate paeseree of ind;vi¢saI GIs and rat. Hv r ewr.riiv i-.....� DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow, sweep Codominants/tcrks Multiple attadtments Included bark ' Excessive end weight Craclkslspli is Hangers Girdling Woun leeam Decay Cavity Conss/mushroomsibracket Gleedtnglsap flow Lakwatcracked bark Nesting hdd/heo hj e Deadwoodistubs Borer:/termitow/ants Cankers/galis/b arts Previous fallure RATING Tree part most likely to fail. —Cphi n j Fz;l Fa potenffst 1-t0w; 2-medium; 3-high; 4-severa trtspeM;on perirxt an;tual biarn ua7 other Size of part: '1- <5" 2 - ti-� 8" I75-45 cm); Fail— + S y Pam, Target Ratck4= Rat n9 3 - 1 8v0' (45-75 em); 4 - a30" ('S cm) TQ;9d1--3L19: 1 - boczsiona: u: e; 2 - i ntermitte.�t use; ABATEMENT 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use Pruiw. ❑remove defective part ❑reduce end weight ❑cn7wncim.i t❑thln I]raise Canopy Dcrouvn redkxe ❑ restructure ❑ shape Cable/Brace: -- tnsPeetfurther: ❑rootwwn Cldecay ❑aerial ❑monitor Removetree? Y N Replace? Y N Mbvelarget? Y N C.tte!: Effootonadfaeenttress Orwne ❑evaluate Nobticatior: []owner ❑manager f]g",enrinCagency Date: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL I c� s dated y Dec 08 09 08:33a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.5 *EE ASSESSMENT FAM � All sections of this form must be fully comioleted by a aualifred nroJIMP E' Y E lA. hazard true must have ataaget within 1.5x the height of the tree.) DECO 8 2009 Site/Address: _ 1 31 z o D m a c Vi e V\) f) r _ 8 rulap/Location: # 2- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES --' Owner: public private? unknown cooler COUNTER Date; i o l 3 a'I �>� iD-q Name of Tree Assessor Other Pro'essional Certificates and Qualifications: TREE CFIMACTF-RISTICS Tree R specie- tin u 0� '% na SAC 013ti 2 Y of [tools Height: Spread: X 1 r•4rm: Kenerollysymnretr:c ❑mino•asymmatly OstvrupsPmut ostag-headcd Crown Class: ��jd -nanl d co�or:tiinant p intermediate 0 suppressed Ltvecrown ratio•-`�ry, Agegass: [jypung Qsemi-rnahre LWSMWepower-mature/sermscent Pruning History: perown cleaned ❑excessively ytinned otopped )Lrgotvn raised ❑pollarded ❑ crown reduced ❑flush cuts Ocaded/braceQ ❑ now ❑ multiple Pruningelents Apc ox dates. Special Values i$P-Pcimen 0heritagWN3t*,ic Cwiidlife ❑unusua Dsiraett ee ❑sc een pshads L7;ndlgenous aproFected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH FatrageCovergrrorrrral pchronicpneaubc Ep�n1i8� Y J t� Growth onsVootions: Foliage Density- Atormatpsparse Leafsim-)< Dsmalr 0stakes owireRies Lsigns 0=hles Annual shoot grown 0excellerrt-1191verage Opoor Twig Meback? V R Ocurb4oewement ❑guards Woundwood development oexcelient)!rgverege ❑poor ❑none Mother vigor ctass_C.exceUent1!�Pvmgo Ofair ©poor Major petrtWdisr3ases SITE CONDITIONS Site CluWacter. )R6esiderlce ❑Commercial Gind=da! OPWIA [!open space 0natural .01voodlynd/forest _ Landscape hype. O parkway ©►aisod fed o r:tJ7ltaYier D mound p i3rvn i ]shrub border ['j wind brea< t.^rigation: gone lJ adequate C7 tnodequ4w ❑ oxCEssve ❑ lrrurk wettled Recent site disturbance? Y ® ❑ censtrucilon 0 seir distu banoe Q grade e chan9 ❑line daaring ❑site clan ing 'AtlrrPSne pored: O% lt3 25A 25-50% 50-759h ?5-900% Pavement rifted? Y tV 'A drip Eno WAH9son. 094 10-2s% 25-50% 50-75% 75 10035 h driptine grade rowored: 0% 10-25 25-5016 5C-75 -- :5-1GO% SOU problems: ❑ drainage ❑shadow OcOmpacted ❑droughty Osal:ne ❑a'ka.Gne p c IJ small volume ❑disease Curter ❑his[ o` tall O clay 0 exPR live O slope ? ❑ aspe,- history Uostruetrorrs [] lights ❑sir^age olin--of _ite ❑ few ❑oyertrU-=dfines ❑unc rgrcu-rduGgl; ❑traffic parriacent veg. n� Exposure to wind: O single tree �mr.' gnp7%Y Q above canopy p recently:tp eosed �? w' t a ce'WPY edge D area Prone to w!nthhrft, Prevailing wind direction:, (V /=nggce Of SnOv/ice Vp; ms ❑ never "om ❑ regufaAy TARGET �1 Use Under Tree: 65Ouirding [?parking D U;EdrC QPeQestran Can target be moved? Y ❑ retreat orr OhardsCape CsrneU feaaurrM Ouh7ity Urtag Can ore be restricted? Y QcwPancy: 0 occasxurat use ❑ iMerr: iBeM use fl'requeM use tension! use 5 Dec 08 09 08:33a Leslie Yarbrough • 206-362-3011 p.6 . • TREE ©ERECTS r. .T. r•.�=ate suspect root rot- Y Q Wahmorrkonk/bracket presealz Y ® IElt Exoosed rootr- O t avem ❑moderate 141ow Underrr&.e& Osevere Omoderate lstow Root pruned: Root area affeeled % Buttress wounded: Y N Men: (� �'�� Raetricted Mai ar"t []severe ❑ nnsoder;M err P.,.hW for coat failure: (]severe ❑ moderate * LEAN: deg,fronvertical ❑natural ❑umatwal Self -corrected Sailheateng: Y OU 2009 Decay in ptarm of lean: Y ON Roots broken: Y Soil cracking: Y `: J DECU Cl. Compound rig facdars: hart severity: ❑severe ❑ mcclWate u lour DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CROWN 171:PW S: Indicate ovneee of indivkkbd defects and rate tlrir severity {severe, m=moderate, Wow) COUNTER OEFECT HOOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS ORANCHES Poor taper Bow, syreep Codominante/torks Mvltipte wtactiments Included bark Excessive end weight Cracks; splits Hangers Girdling WouncWseam Decay Cavity Conks/mushmomslbra' wt Bleedingfsap flow Loose/snacked bark Nesting hotdrbea Nvo Deadwoodlstubs Borers/termites/ants Gankersrgal.3iburls Previous failure RATING Tree part nest likely ;o tatt 1 Failure potential: 1-lair 2-medium; 3-trgh; 4-severe lnspcctlon period: annual blarnual o'Jter Size of part 1- cfi' 2 - 6 1 B' i15 45 crnt; FailurePotentiaf + Sae o{Part } forget Rating = Ffezantl Rating i 3 - I8-W (45-75 cm); a - >30" (75 an) G-11 L'st �i) TEML% raCno: 1 - occasional use: 2 - hWrrr&ent use; ABATEMENT I 3 - freCuem use; 4 - constant use __ Prune: Oremovedefective part t3reduceendweigM Dcmcvrtelean ❑mi., Cfrasecanopy ❑crovmn:dace ❑resructure ❑shape Cablo/Braee: inspaattuAher. Cmot crown ❑decay ❑canal ❑monitor Remove tree? Y N Reptace7 Y N Mare target? Y N Other, Effect anadjaoertt1m*s ❑none Oevatuate NOWMtiorx ❑ewner ❑manager 13 governing agency Ekda SIGNATURE OF MOFEsSEONAL sign dated M Dec 08 09 08:34a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.7 AEE ASSESSMENT FA AU sections of this forrn must be fu!& Completed by a auaJified professional (A tward tree must hays a target Wthi:t 1 Ax the height of the tree.) Site/Address: M143 0 Dl V rn>p I C w Or 1UPA.ocation: _ 3 Owner. public private unknown other I I ` Date: 1 1 (� Name of Tree Assessor. n ►'1 I �-P�V W e 1 l3 I SAtr P N 102 d::1 4 Other Professional Certificates and Quafificatlons: TREE CHARACTERISTICS DBH: y —1 No�t tr/unks: ` Height Spread: , CC Q (� Form ❑generauy symmetric )Z,4- or asymmetry Oshunp sprout Ostag-headed UC� o U )O�J Crown [doss dYdommant ❑ co -dominant Q intermediate i7 suppressed DEC U L uvecrown ratio: SO% Agecla— 0young ❑semi-neturetture ijFrrermahae/senesuxrt NVELOPMENT SERVICES Pruning History: []crown cleaned O excessvdy ttdraW ❑ topped Y— /raised ❑pax a1dad 0., reduced Gtkr h cuts ❑cahled/braQUNTER ❑ none 0 rwftle pnrnhtg events App cx. dates: Special Yalu !]specimen Cherrlagefhisto is pvdtdlfie [junusua. p�� tree gscreen ❑sisal `o Pdgenous ❑protected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover.7klnwmul Qenronicpneciiotic Epicarm.-es? Y © Growth obstruction Foliage Density: 06ormal1]sperse Leafsae`$fomrat❑ tF O takes ❑wiretties Csigns Gt�be; Annual shoot growth:❑excetlent1! verage Opoor Tlvig DiebacW? Y N 0 curbipavement ❑ guards Woundwood development: Qexceltent*verage op., Cnono Qcrher Vigor class ❑exca@errt .1%a1WZge ❑ fafr Clpoor rAalor pestsldtrieases; SITE CONDITIOO14S Site ctreracter. 11 jftdence C.Icommercial Oindus nal O park M aPen space ❑ natural ❑ tvOCdlartdrfo real Lan-We h✓ype: ❑ P-k—y ❑raised bed ❑ coatainer Q rrmmd O larm ❑ shn,b border ❑ wind break Imgalion:Orre ❑-equate ❑ Irradequute ❑ e ❑ trunk wanted siecent Wt.disturbance7 Y © ❑ eenstrucfion 0 aril distirbance ❑ grade change y ❑tine Bearing ❑ site clearintl dripU""& p„fed: o% 10-2596 25-50% SG-7545 75-11004o Pavement lifted? Y N 'A drIPWO w/l"Ysoit ` 096 1!]- 25-50% so-7!j% 75-100% 'Sr dripline grade lowered: 0% 10-2596. 25-50% 5¢75" 75-100% Soil problems: ❑ drainage Qshaltow Compacted ❑droughty ❑ salinn 03*23ine ❑ acidre ❑small volume ❑disease center ph Cory at tall 0 cray ❑ expensive ❑ slope_? ❑ aspect UtImuetion¢ ❑ 5ghts ❑ signa99 ❑ tirade-cr-ee O viely ❑ ovefieed lines ❑ und?rgrcuad 1tGfi5c5 ❑ t affic pad acer veg. CL_ Exposure io wind: ❑single tree : CaReily O aboYe q_ , �P.v O recendy exposed 0 tvirrcAvard. campy edSe []area prone to w+ndihrovr Prevailing wind dwectiorc _� s A' q never -,Kseidom G regutarlY TARGET Pan Use UndorTree: u7dtr41 Qprrtdng CiralFc Qp srsdn ❑ `ecre"-lion ❑landscape, Ohadscape ❑smallfeatures ❑utiiityFin3Z Cen target be moved? Y N© Gan use be restripted7 Y VccuWncY: U --Fonw use ❑ intenrtinaM tSe Otrequent use �r rstwrt use Dec 08 09 08:34a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.8 - TREE DEFECTS Suspect root rot Y 6N Mushroomlconkthracket present Y cp IEx Exposed roots: ❑ severe Ornoderks 112kow UndermFned: ❑ severe © moderate -- Root premed: Root ame affect % &Mree_s imunded Y G Wnert �E� VP ED Qocfrk tod met won: ❑severe p rnaderale �rx Petemua, ror root fz tout: []severe ❑ moderate ',I*w LEAN, dMton verical ❑nahnal CIunnattuel WVcorreded Soil heaving: Y �2l DEC 08 2009 Decay in plasw of tears: V Roc.taakee: Y Soil cracking: Y N Compoundng faetcm tin severity: n severe ❑ moderate i>4- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CROWN DEFECTS Ind=ate presence of ird}vidual detects and ratetherseverity (_.severe, rru mn edete, I=Iew) COUNTER DEFECT R017TCROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Pcor.sper Row, sweep CodominanWorks Multiple attachments IncludeA bark Excessive end weight Cracwsplds Hangers Girdling Woundsreeam Decay Cavity Co nke/mushroomarbracket Neadtng.$a' flow Loose%tacked bark Nosting hold/bee hive Deadwood(stubs B3OrWrAermitestants Cankerslgallslburts P'evious ktilure RATING T.-ea Par. Most likely to fall: i 1 V�� tnspectlon period: - mamual Failure Potential + Size of Part+ T e�ng= yazerd RWhIS ABATEMENT Fahtre patent-C 1-1our, 2-medium 3- V11: 4-Severe other Size of part 1- <5^ 2 - 6-18- 115-45 crn ; i I 3 - 18-30"(45-75 Cm): 4 - >3U (75 cm) Ta.Sett rating: 1 - occasions! use; 2 - intermittent use; 3-frequent use 4 - conswd use Prune: ❑removeddectivepaft Oreduceendveignt r—cmwndaan 0tttin 0--pry ❑aawnreduce ❑resuuclure ❑shape CabfelBrace• Inspect further, oroot crown ❑decay paerial I]mmftcr Removeiree? Y N Replace? Y N Movetarger Y N OUtes; Efreetonadjeoerttlreeu: ❑name Qeualuate Notilleation: ❑owner grtanager Q governing agency Date: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL Dec 08 09 08:34a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.9 • • TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM SitelAddress: MaplLoc afion: _ Owner: public private V unknown other /� Date �� rist S ISA* � iA Arborist's Signature: TREE CHARACTERISTICS J HAZARD RATING: 2 +2, + LA =-2- Failwe + Size + Target = Hazard Potential of part Rating Rating Immediate action needed Needs Anther inspection Dead tree Tree P Species: DW: �o — k of trunim_ �L Height 1— ?i Spread* Form: xgenw dfy 3ymmeide❑ minor esynnAWy ❑ nr�or asymmetry ❑ stump spro A O stagfieaded ®® Crown Class: ❑ dominard �[co donrnarA ❑ irdemrediate E3 suppressed RECEIVED Uwe Crowm rats*-M% Age Class: )( Young ❑ semiansture O mature O over-mature/senescent Pruning History. ❑ mown cleaned O eaoesslwely filmed topped i(gown raised O pollarded O crown reduced O flush cuts ❑ wbfedUacedl Cf� 08 2009 O none Ymulliplepruning events Approx dates IJ[l� Special Value: ❑specimen O her tagedhisiorio ❑wddrde ❑ tmusual o street tree ❑ saver, ❑ shade)kindlgenolfs 0 proteMd by goo. age"SEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE HEALTH COUNTER Foliage Cover. A normal ❑ chronic ❑ necrolic Eatcormics? Y N� Growth obstructions: Foliage Density: X.M., ❑ sparse Leaf size: ❑ normal O snwil ❑ stakes O wireftim ❑ signs ❑os6les Annual shoot grwnm: ❑ excellent )average ❑ poor Twig pehsek? Y N� O cvrGfpevemenl O nos woundwood development O exoegent ❑ average O poor ❑none ottxr L• Vigor dass: O ecodlent ❑ average fair ❑ poor Me1or pestaldissases: SJTE CONDITIONS Site Character.-esld"Ce O ootnmendal O industrial O park O open sp ace ❑ natural ❑ woedlandfforest Landscape type: 0 parkway ❑ raised bed ❑ contains o mound ❑ laan ❑ shrub border ❑ wind break lrrfgatlon: X none O adequate ❑ Irr equate ❑ ezces�ve Q mail yretkd Recent site disturbance? Y O construction O sod �rbence O glade change O iine clearing ❑ site dearing drkp0ne paved: 0% 10-26% 2550% 50-75% 75-100% Pavement Mood? Y N % dripline w/5D so ik 10.25% 50-75% 75100% % dripllne grade lowered: 36 10-2.K% 25-60% 50-75% 75 100% Soil problems o dmlrMge Q shalbw ❑compacted O droughty O selin e ❑ alkakm ❑ addie O smart volume ❑disease center O historyof fail ❑ day ❑ expansive ❑ slope ? aspect _ Obstructions: ❑ lights ❑ signage ❑ line-d•sae ❑ view O lines O u r>dergroMrd u6tifies ❑traffic ❑ aglaoent veg. O Exposure to wind -it �ingt'ae t� � Qabo re capoPY O reoentlY exposed II windward can ePY edge O area ptorle to windthrow Prevailing wind dtreclion: oxurrence of snowfice slum's O never ❑ sefdom O regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: (budding O perking )(draTjx O pedestrian O reaeallan ❑ I can mrc�t DB ff W►BG? Y N h pe ❑ ft'd ❑ amgf features O utility Imes Cats use 62 resded? Y f@ Occupancy: ❑ ocassionsl use ❑ inntem*tetrt use 13frequem use 4xcons47nt use 9 Dec 08 09 08:35a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p,10 • RECEIVED TREE DEFECTS DEC 0 B 2009 DEVEMM SERVICE' ROor DEFECM COUNTER Susoam goat rot- Y (Iv 7 MuahroomfoonWbracketpresent YCN) ID: Expoaad root: 0 severe X_Werate 0low Undermined: 0 severe Vmoderata O low Root pnamd: am area affected: % Suams grounded: Y D when: ReMclad coat area: 0 severe eraW 0 dCW Potential for root failure: 0 severe %moderate ❑ low LEAN: deg. From ver" ❑ natural O unnelurai Deck-cornaclod Son hoe ng: Y Q Decay In plane of lean: Y C14 Roots broken: Y CN� Sold cracking: Y t Compounding fecows Lean severbar: O severe G moderele flow CROMV DEFLECTS: Indicate preaeme of irtmvWUal aeferxs and nite thetrtlevedty (severe, m�noderale, Wow) DEFECT ROOTCROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES oor, raper awe sweep Codomfnardwyorks MIA" attaohmenia Induded bark 15c lva end welght rackamplila Hangers Girdling Wounftfsaarn Dewy Cavity CankehnushrooW bracket Bdesdirgifeap flow Lcose/cmcked bark Nesling holdfSee hive ea woo u s eaaanermltealents C9nkerGg8W urla Previous allure HAZARD RATING Tree part most likely to tag: Failure potential; 1-low; 2medlum; 34,igb; 4savere Inspection period: ` annual biannual other Size of port i - <5' (is cm); 2 -6-18' (13+i6 cm); FailurePotential + Si�,g of Pmt + Tsg Ratlng = t Raying �Z 3 —1&30' (45-75 cm); 4 -> 30" (75 cm} r + = target rifting: 1 —occasional use; 2—intemlrttent use; HAZARD ABATEMENT 3 —frequent use; 4 —constant use Prune: ❑ remove defective part C reduce end weight Q crown clean ❑ thin O ralse canopy O crown reduce O restructure ❑ shape CablNBraee: , IrrspecR further O root crown O decay O aerial O monifor Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Other. Effect on adJacant trees: O none ❑evaluate NctfficeHon: ❑ owner O manager Xeoveming agency COMMENTS data:�l 1�_ r 19 Dec 08 09 08:35a Leslie Yarbrough • 206-362-3011 p.11 • TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM All sections of this form must be fu1V Y coMplefedft a cert>fed armorial SIWAddress: l7 i t 1ft { MOVLocatjofr Owner. public_ Prnrdte unknownother Date: \� f 1 rl t 15A��CCi JUt Arbaf4l; Signature. .TREE CHARACTERISTICS t^ Spades IDBH- a of bunks; Form: 1 Y SYmineldt:10 minor RECEIVE �Yumnabff Q major asynr+rteby O stu mp apraut Drtag-headed 0 Crawnclass: O codoainant O intermediate O Live crew ►auo;�� suppressed ❑semi mature ❑ rmacaa D Over -mature senescent DEC 0 V 2009 Pruning ifissory: D ctaam cleaned ❑ Y u ❑ topped D awn raised ❑ PFfladed EP crown reduced D flush cute O cobieftraced none ❑ mutipe Pfur*V events „M=, dates: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Special value: Ospedmen 13heritagftfhL~fedc ❑ wWdafe ❑ unusuat ❑ str e3tfree ❑screen D enada f„d ,,, ❑>nr ared by 9ov. agar COUNTER TIME HEALTH ravage Cover: Xnwraf O chronic O necrotic EPlconnics7 Y N G owd obstructions: Fovage density: Xnonrrd O sparse Loaf stne: Orlon, O amen ❑ stakes D Wbefftes Annuli Moot �,t O signs ❑cables Wtwndwood evelo O ez�neM &eMP El Poor Twig�Oleback7 Y N a curWpavernent O guards pimewt O axcaU l U average CJ pow ) soma D ofher Vigor Flea- O -4 Xaveraye O fair ❑ Poor Major pesistdiseesm SITE COMMONS Site Character: Are9Weecs O 00mmeW41 ❑ industrial ❑ Park ❑ open space D natural ❑ vroodlendfiorast L OWSOWe type: O FahrreY a raised bed ❑ O m container ound ❑ lawn O ahrub border ❑ %*w break An "m ❑ adequate O inadequate O axcesstve ❑ Mmk roosted Recent site . y a oonstnfclion ❑ -3 disbsberx:e ❑ % drfptlme pavan tirade Grange ❑lino Bearing ❑alto Bari eng � 7a25'!6 256096 50.7596 75.1009f Pavement rifted] Y N % drlpOne wflvf Salk 10Qi% 2550% 50.75% 75-1009G % dripUmSfade 1&25% 25M% -50.75% 75.100% 300 Problems: ❑ drainage ❑ W WOW a Fom pac0ed D droughty O Seine O alkaline acdc O smvolume O dseiseac, for O �ryof tail D day O t�ermive O slope � Obstructions: Dights O sianage O Gnoesne Oviery Oovwhead roes O card un Exposure to WhW: D single tree ory Fanapy D above canopy ❑ ergrod unties 17 trafic O adjaoerd veg. O PrwaHing wind direFtkmL- * y exPOsed D windorard, canopy edge Oarea prate 10 wirdUxOw Ooaarencs of snowlwe slams D never Acid— ❑ regu" TARGET Use under Tree: ❑ building ❑ parking '%ralrrc a Pedestrian ❑ raeraWan Cen t"W be tnaveis7 Y N) Obandaeape ❑ hardscape ❑ smell features O utirdy Ones Can ass b@ restrlctedT Y Np Occrgomclr O ccseslonei use ❑ 6demdueot rue h rd use 0 constant use Dec 08 09 08:36a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 P.lz T1iEE DEFECTS ROOT DMCTs: 8uspeotrootrot YfN1 NtushnoaWavialUbmketpresent; Y 1& ID: REC IVE ,,, Exposed recta; O silvers E l moderels *ow undermined: 0 severe 0 rnaderate Mow Root pruned: Root area aeaeted: % Quttress Wounded: y CN when: Resmew root arec 13 severe 0 moderate frvoterrtial for root fafitrre: ❑ eevare O rata Aft- dap-Fromver&;tl nndural Dumraorrei DoW-corrected Soil heav a: Y 6✓ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Decay Is plane Of lean: Y Q Roots broken: YO Sall cracking: Y n) COUNTER Corapocnding factors: Lean severity: ❑severe 0 moderate u row CROt+lp11 DEFECTS: Indlreta mamm al indl ftW defects and rate their oeverfty (saevare, rrFnrodersta, t--" HFSCT ROUT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCitWS POW Gaper 004p Codox�nentafforks multioe attadwerds rratudlud and welght Cra sp e angera e diing Woundslsearn Decay Cavity Corikatmustwoornaffii ket lnpfsep flaw Locackradred bark Meeting holqfbes RW— Cleadwaodf-stubs earerenerm sealants CankeWilal elburls Previous rallure HAZARD RATING l + Tree part most likely to fall: _•, 1 / � Ca � 6 Failure Potential: VOW; 2medium; 3-high; 4-severe Inspection period:— annual biannual atlrer_ SIM of parr- t -49- 05 an); 2 - 6,18' (15-45 cm); Fellure PoterMd * Size or Pan + Target Raring - M =m R" 9 - l a-W' (45.75 CM); 4 - :- Str (75 Gn) * r am larget rsurg: t-oecaMonel ufi% 2 - rMarmittent use; 8-Imquentuse, 4-constant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weigtd CablaMraca: O Crown clean ❑ 16in O raise canopy 17 crown reduce 0 restructure 0 ehripe Inspact further 0 root crown 0 decay 0 aerial 0 martpor Remove traa: Y N Replace? Y tf Alkwo Farget Y N parer Enact On adlacOM trees: 0 none 0 evaluate NOtifteticn: ❑ owner 0 mansger Cl goveming agency pa(e:41 ' '�^ I D 1 COMMENTS Dec 08 09 08:36a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 P.13 • is - TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM AN mwscffM of this ronitn must be Way completed by a certified erborls 8: IcAL1 f)lyrnL�iC V; ".Me�ll..ocmton: - Owner. Pubft --- P*ate X unknown other Deft: W410 Arbomat 1 I ISA#: _=ArbQrlat's Signature: CHARACTERIS = HAZARD RATING; FaWm + 1y at Hazard potential of pout nlmedlate action Needs further hlmpecWn Dead tree Pitmen: 13 per -My symmeMecl minerr f�qe SPnad: Crown Clew: D domrnant wpm" `m* mmme" aatemP eprotat 0 g}w-wed )<codomfimrt Elm inteadWe ❑ suppressed Ltva atomretlo-,IS Age Claw: 13 yeung 0seml matum Xm lure Dover metuaslaenaacant �� '�� Prunfap Hletory: ❑ 00" deened 0 exmm*ely ttdnned 13 topped ❑ aawa aWmd Elpolwded 0 crown reduow a eueh cute 13 cabled/braced Xnrte Oem4ffl0& Pmning averds Appmx deter; DECSpecial value: oepec+men0herR�emrahnrc13vldfe0am,suet021108ttren0screen Dahade)4nagen—L7proteotedbygov, EC UB 2009 TREE HEALTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Fofto Cover: O nomml D chronic D nafcronc Eploomdoe? Y Growth ombuctions: e Dnns�lY: 0 nomad �s m" Loaf algae 0 namel a amen Aanue! shoat 13 Stakes 0 e�aelties 0 signs 0cables sue*: Q exodkid 0 avntage Xppor 7W4 Dtabaoh7 (D N fYQreedwood developorwIt 10 amde d 0 0 oher vement 0 ptmlps avotPpe OPoar Di(oone O other Vigor blase: ❑ ft relkm O werApe 13forr Xp— Maw pu ftmitea mm SITE COMMONS 8f0a Character Xresidence ❑ commerdal a Indusalal 0park O open SPece 0 feeturel 0 woodrand/farett Landscape type: 0 Parkway 0 mread bed Cl owdafner 0 mound CI laws 0 shrub border Qvind break Q adequate 0 fnadw e 0 e ve 0 trust weNed Resent a dMA igurbance? Y N O eonatmCfion Q sail dlatttrhanoe 13 grade ctlmn 0 line % drt hne paved: S 256096f1e doaringOsitedeadrtg% detpllne trM11 son:Pavement WON Y N 2-W%60-75%%delpttnegrade lowered: 1"5% 25-M% 5a75% 75-IW% Sop Wobfems 1] domMe 0 efolew 0 conrpeCtad 12 droughty 0 saline D erkeapa 0 adfic (7 small volume 0 disease center C historyof fen ❑ daY a expenarve Q ape? Obstructions: G Hants 0 wPe�t bona" 13 Reed-srm 1] view 0 urmnead Rnee CT u Is 0aure t0 wind: 0 ample tree nderpmund upllties ❑ bteFtic O edJeaerR veg. g -y:� SPY baboveeanopy U reorrtly ®Puma Q Pnwalfing whrd Ahsctlore w��.' asnopy edge 0 arse prose to wiWthrow 00curceaaoe of snowece tuomm ❑ never o Seldom Q regularly TARGET tale under Trew 0 bdJdr 0 perking Xt-Mc O pedeatdmt 13reanaalion plandsce Csn UW be ntevsd? Y bN Can sse be resfrfcted? yL) Pe p herdsa�pe O amen feet Me O uft Rnea tJccupOW 0 oaaOngi bgg O iAWnriltem use ),�aquent use 0 eoelslant use 1a Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough. 206-�3011 p,14 TREE DEFECTS ROOTDEFECTS: �y''�� RECEIVE® Suspect root rot- V' 5 Mteshrgonrfcmtidarackst pessorrt Y(9 ID: Exposed mots: Daevere xntadea to Blow Undermined *_rs O moderate G low 08 2009 Root omned: Root alas affec at I % fsatu"s wuundeu: r N when: DEC �J C Rastrletad root arcs O xevero U moderate O law tPommtw for root fallura Aware a Rate O Iow DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LEAN: deg, From vernod O nmtuw O wimetww 0 edl-oar+eatad son heaving: Y N COUNTER DWAY in plane of lean: Y91 Roots bmken:p N Soil araWdng� r i N Compounding factors; �• Lean aevernyr: O severe CI —oasts U low C1 CKW DEFFC7^S tndlmte orotraroa d {rdMdttal dafacta and rasa Cheer aevaebv [sasavere. rrrmrldareta, tGgrvl AtOFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS SMNCHES POW WW 10W. sweep 0lba aC fna lflic� bark and are(ghl rac slapl is Hangars Girdling Woundsfseam Doerr Cavity Cor*$fMuehrcomsobre t alead rqfsap flaw ooselors bark sting hold/bes hive ElearwoWatubs SofarsAaRlesfants Cenkarsfgauslburts reDusfailure HAZARD RATING Tree part moat awy to fall: 1 X -r -r 1 !, lk XM L1L k.A FaHure ywtendeL 41ow;1rmedium 3�N& 4-savere inapectlon pentad', ennual biannual other _ size of part 1 - RW (15 Om): 2 - 6-18- (1546 cro): Failure Potential t Sue of Pan + Target Rating a Hmud ltaltng 3 — f B-3n' (46 75 cm); 4 - a 30` (75 cm) + o I argot retmg 1— oocaelonal Una! 2— intelmnfent use; 3—Regwent use; 4—conmeni use HAZARD ABATEMENT Pmna: ❑ remove de"ve part Q redum end weight (1 crowm dean O thin a rake canopy O rxmvn reduce D regfucWre d shape Cableterace: fnspectfWMer: O root gown Odeeay O eadal O monllor Remove tree: Y Raplace? Y N Move Target: Y N t]ther. Effect qn adJacent trees: O noma devaluate Mollification- Downer O manager a govemine pWirCY Date: COMMENTS I14 Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362.3011 p.1 b TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM A11 sections of this form must be Wy completed by a certified arborlst. Slte(Address: Mepfl ocaticn: + Z += Owner. public private inknown other ,..q � Grp Fairure + Size + Target L Huard Oats: I A ISt S tSR# ! LI►T l Potential of part Reling Rating Irr radiate action needed Arborisrs Signature: + Needs hather inspedon Dead tree TREE CHARACTERISTICS HAZARD RATING: 1 Tftetk Species: J�1riks rl6�b DBHL OotOitiits._ Height) ��' r- L� Spread: T pp Ratm: ly symmstdoO minor asymnWay ❑ major asymmetry O stump sprout ❑ stag -heeded RECEIVE V Crown Class: Aornirtanl D co•doninad ❑ intennedial a ❑ suppressed LaEC 08 Lava crown ratio[��• Aga Claw: young la saro mature ClClmature ❑ over-matunwsenescenl 200E Prurdre History: O crown leaned ❑ excessively thinned 0 tapped ❑ sown raised D potiarded ❑ sown reduced fl flush cuts D cabledione . )(ncns D multiple pruning enrite AppWx dates ��ELOPIWENT SERVICES Special value: Dspedmen D haftSafhtatoric D vdtdllfe ❑ unusual D street iree 0 screen ❑ shad.AIndigenous D pfulacled by gov, agency COUNTER TREE HEALTH Foliage CovenArl-nai ❑ rAmnle O necrotie Epicormks? Y ON Fallege Denatgr:*oral ❑ sparse Leal size= ❑ nanttal O smml Annual shoot growth: O excenent 9average ❑ poor Tvig pieta;*? Y N Woundwood developmeaC O excelieni D average ❑ poor Vnone Vtgor class: O e=etient Yeverage Dfair D poor Major pastsldisesses• SITE CONDITIONS Growth obstructions: Q stakes ❑ wire/des O signs 0(mbles LJ curtrpavemeni 13 guards Ct other Site Character. Vle:tidem:e p eommardel D industrial ❑ park O open space ❑ natural O woodlendiforesl Landscape typo: D parkway D raised lied D contairter D mound D lawn ❑ shrub border ❑ wind Meal* lMgatton: D none ❑ adequa�te 01nadequale D axcesalrs t] trunk we0leo Reaerrt ells dlMntpanee? Y t�N 0011211FUCU n D sail disturbance, ❑ grade change ❑ tine deeding ❑ site *!caring % drlpllae pavodt 10-25% 25.50% 50-75% 75.100% Pavement lifted? Y N % drip6de winll sail. 10-n% 25.50% 60.75% 75.1o0% % driplinegmde lowered: 096 10-25% 2550% S0-75% 75-100% sots problems: O drainage a shallow ❑ compacted D dmughty D saflne ❑ aikeline D eddic O snail volume Ddisaase tender ❑ hisloryof fail Delay 17 expensive D srope ? aspect Obstructions: O Iighis O signage ❑ Oae.cf.sits O visw ❑ overhead tines D underground utirdies ❑ traffic O adjacent vag. ❑ Exposure to wind. D aingle tree 1*a1ow canopy E]above canopy D recently exposed 17 windward, canopy edge ❑ area prone Io windthrow Prevailing wind direction:- !� 00tuffencealsnow/ice storms O naver ❑ saidom D reguledy TARGET Use under Tree: ❑ budding A—Iik ng ❑ trarftc O pedeatdan D roc L'ari tAl$e! ae taovad? Y reaUan ❑tendscape ❑ hardecepE ❑smell fe8tufes 0 tAilil� flneS N) Can use rasodcted? Y M-wancy: Ci occasfanal use O tntemnillant use frequent use 0 constant use RA Dec 08 09 08:37a Leslie Yarbrough • 206-362-3011 P.16 TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: � Suspectrootrot Y( N) IMushroomteonkfbracketproseat 'VONID RECE a glmed roots: 0 saaveem O nmdarO* Undarmina4: O severe O moderate JU imm Root pruned: of ar ovacm&- % autfims/ ` vmunaoa: Y D when: 06G 2009 fneoWcbd root ama: El some 0 moderate>(kM Fotaedal for root failure: Dsevere D modarete *- LLWN deg. From veo)" D natuno D emwxurd DadFeonected "I b"Wing: Y N DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Decay In plane oFlemr Y D Roofs broken: Y ty Soil cracking: YeN COUNTER Compoundfre factors: Leon aeverltr. D severe 0 moderate U'em IMM DEFECTS: tndleate ptasenae of IndWtduel defects eMl ram their t,eVertiy (tt�savere. IK-trroderale, i=1aw) 'DEFECT ROOT CROMM TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor toper saw,owaep inanreff orks ai a aftchmeft k Fuvoa ve end w ghl Cre e Hangers GInging Mumbiso m Dim C-* ponkef mah bradrel eaogfsop flora acae/cracked bark NwAnQ hold/bee hlye Deadw000ftlubs oremitarmltaeimir. Cankenugallsiburts re ousfailure HAZARD RATING � / w�r�rwarrr�r.�mr_ Tree pmt,most gkelyto fall: 4�� Q 1 0 Faflure potential: taow; Zmadium; 34igh; 4-severe frtspecdon period:_ annual ^_— b—Ian Pn;,* oher_ Size atPat t -<s 416anj 2-6to (lSis cm): Fall�ruial + 3,,"1of�Part * Target Rating a If Rat>hg 3 - 1 aj Er (45-73 cm); 4 - > 30" (75 an) lafget rating: i - 0cm6lonal use; 2 - intarmftterd tls4 HAZARD ABATEMENT 3 -frequent use; 4 -Constant use Prune; O remove defeetive parl D reduce and weight ❑ cmvmi dean 17 INn O rdm canopy D sown reduce O restrudwa 0 shape Cablef8race: Inspectfarther. O root crown 0 decay O aerial D manllor Rareove troa: Y N Replace? Y N Move Target Y N other; Wket on ecgacent trees: O nomf 0 awalaale NohTmatlon: Downer O mnneger D gawrnfag agency Date: COMMENTS 1.W Dec 08 09 08:38a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.17 0 PROPOSAL i tv Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way Suite #123 Edmonds WA. 98020 Office:206-362-3380 * 425-771-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed. ID# 91-2007614 K UBI # 601-960-331 N $2,000,000 Liability Coverage — Contractor # washite926mm Submitted To: Estimate Date -Time of E Omatz Referer�e Lifin Wu' 6:- _ ! 18430 Olympic View Dr. 12-4-09 LF 06-8850 t` Edmonds, WA 98020 �� we hereby propose tD furnish material and labor F to complete the work outlined here in for the sum of: Phone# 920-698-2229 plus sales tax „t Added info liiinwu@gmaii.cam weamwtall ma, 0rc'redNcan& Washington Tree Experts proposed to Complete tree removal using the foilowing methods: -a professional tree climber will ascend each tree and bring it down in manageable pieces (no felling or craning) -only the use of private property is necessary -the equipment will be set up in the driveways and will include truck and chipper -all portions of the trees will be dropped on private property RECEIVED DEC 0 8 2009 . DEVELOPOENT NTERFMCES PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS 121 Fltlh Ave. No. Edmonds, Washington 98020 We guarantee all material used in this contract to be as specified above and the entire job to be done in a neat, workmanlike manner. Any variations from this proposal or alteaWns requiring extra labor or material adll be performed only upon written order and billed in addition to the sum covered by this contract. Agreements made with our fioremen are recognized. Necessary Permits are property owner's 1' TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON JOB COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS NOT PAID WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE WILL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED JOB WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AGREED UPON SCNEDULED JOD DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above specificati2qs terms and Contract are satasiactory, and (IXwe) hereby authorize the performance of this Wen Estimator CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONTRACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER Dec 08 09 08:39a Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.20 • PROPOSAL • Washington Trow 9792 Edmonds Way Sulte #f123 Edmonds WA. 98020 Office:205-362-3380 * 425-771-443D * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed. !D#` :'1-2DO7614 N UEs # 601-960-331 N $2,000,000 Liability Coverage N Contractor # washite926mrr Subnritted To. i Estimate Date Time oFEstimateReference P Phone #:, Lilin Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 920-698-2229 led Info liiinwu@gmail.com 8i-4-09 LL I 06.8362 BID We hereby propane to furnish rnaberlal and labor to complete the work outlined here in for the sum of: plus sales tax We accept all nnafar credit cards �-_- ,.. •.•.- ��• �+yr W.+.Wu%11ic4+UWVVc aiRd WC QiL11C jWU LU uC LuIC in d r1CdL, VYururndnime manner. Any vadakhns from tN5 propel or alterations requiring extra labor or inaterial will be performed only upon written order and billed In addition tc the sum cowed by this contract. Agreements made with our foremen are recognized. Necessary Permits are prey, ►' vtl,nee4, --- _� responsibility, TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON 305 COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS NOT-^10 WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE WILL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED 300 WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED JOB DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above Spec1f7cat1,-ms, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (I)(we) hereby authorize the performance of till Estimator y CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONTRACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A. COPY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER Message Page 1 of 1 Clugston, Michael From: Clugston, Michael Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: 'Yao Yutian' Subject: RE: Tree cutting permit - incomplete application Thanks for the heads up. I just received an additional request from our Engineering Division - it's attached. If you have any questions, please let me know. Mike -----Original Message ----- From: Yao Yutian [mailto:yaoyutian@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:13 AM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: Re: Tree cutting permit - incomplete application Hi Mike, Thank you for your email. I called to Jennifer Wells (Washington Tree Experts), She'll be my property tomorrow afternoon to check the other 4 trees, I will send the documents to you as soon as possible when she send to me. Thank you! Yutian Yao 2009/12/2 Clugston, Michael <clu sg ton a,ci.edmonds.wa.us> Mr. Yao, Thank you for submitting the additional materials on November 24th for the three other trees you are considering removing. The photos are particularly helpful. However, the tree assessment forms submitted on the 24th were the same as those you previously submitted for trees 1, 2, and 3. 1 need the assessment forms for trees 4 and now 5, 6 and 7 as well. Please submit the additional assessments as soon as you can so I can continue my review of the project. Have a good day. Mike Clugston, AICP Planner { City of Edmonds Development Services Department P: 425-771-0220 1 F: 425-771-0221 michael.clugston .ci.edmonds.wa.us 12/3/2009 r C CI1WF EDMONDS - PLANNING DIVISON REQUEST FOR COMMENT FORM Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ PubI1C Works !❑ Parks L Rec ❑ Building ❑ Treatment ka' nt ❑Economic Dev. Project Number: PLN20090054 Applicant's Name: YUTIAN YAO Property Location: 18430 OLYMPIC VIEW DR Date of Application: 11 12 09 Date Form Routed: 11 /13/09 EIVE Zoning: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS-12 N Project Description: TREE REMOVAL ENGINEERING DIVISION "PER ECDC 20.02.005 ALL COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 15"DAYS OF THE DATE, THIS, FORM WAS ROUTED: 11:30.09 If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MICHAEL CLUGSTON Ext. 1330 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: le ftmfQ )Vl Title: 'i�/II W11 . WffIAX 11 ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): r: Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM December 3, 2009 Mike Clugston, Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN20090054, Tree Removal — Single Family Residence 18430 Olympic View Drive The comments provided below are based upon review of the application and documents submitted for the proposed tree removal at the Yao residence located at 18430 Olympic View Drive. Additional information is requested from the applicant at this time. Please ask the applicant to provide the following information. Please revise the site plan to include a north arrow, the driveway to the residence and location of Olympic View Drive with relation to the trees and the house. Provide additional information with regards to how the trees will be removed. Where will crews and equipment be set up? Will all work take place from private property? Will all portions of the trees be dropped on private property? Thank you, Jeanie City of Edmonds Clugston, Michael From: Clugston, Michael Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 11:02 AM To: 'yaoyutian@gmail.com' Subject: Tree cutting permit - incomplete application Mr. Yao, Thank you for submitting the additional materials on November 24th for the three other trees you are considering removing. The photos are particularly helpful. However, the tree assessment forms submitted on the 24th were the same as those you previously submitted for trees 1, 2, and 3. 1 need the assessment forms for trees 4 and now 5, 6 and 7 as well. Please submit the additional assessments as soon as you can so I can continue my review of the project. Have a good day. Mike Clugston, AICP Planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department P: 425-771-0220 1 F: 425-771-0221 michael.clugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us Nov 24 09 02:20p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.2 Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way #123 Edmonds, WA 98020 206-362-3380 staMwashingtontreeezperts.com October 30, 2009 Client: Mr. and Mrs. Wu Location: 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA RE: Tree identification and hazard evaluation to satisfy permit requirements for removal. Tree 1: Doug Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) DBH = 3 T' approx height = 95' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 3 and 4) Observations: -tree has been wind topped there is restricted root zone due to paving and grade -tree is stand alone in prevailing wind Tree 2: Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) DBH = 42" approx height = 75' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 5 and 6) Tree 3: Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) DBH = 44" approx height = 70' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 7 and 8) Observations: -tree is 6" to 12" away from house -there is root interference with the foundation of the home -root pruning is not recommended as it can compromise the structural integrity of the tree Tree 4: Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) DBH = 12" approx height = 35' Observations: -tree is too close to house -tree has multiple co -dominant trunks increasing risk of failure 0 • pl.N Zod�oo5� i'47rf pr yow +D rtvi'e ur- In u ✓e, g-w!5-h'oo 5 Nov 24 09 02:21p Leslie Yarbrough • 206-362-011 p.3 Tree 5: Hemlock DBH = 8" approx height = 25' Tree 6: Western Dogwood (Cornus nutalii) DBH = 2 flunks @ 8" each approx height = 20' Observations: -one trunk has fallen into a neighboring tree -tree has significant rot at the base and should be removed Trees 7: Group of Alder (Alnus rubra) DBH =10". 8". and 4" avvrox height=15-25' Prepared by Jennifer Wells Certified Consulting Arborist PN #6204A Waiver of Liability This information represents Iix tree health assessment at this point in time. My findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. Information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and neffem the condition ofthase items at the time of inspection. The inspection is limited to visml examination ofaccessible item wWwut dissection, excavation, probing, or caring 7 Nov 24 09 02:24p ° Leslie Yarbrough 206-362.3011 p.12 • rxvrUaAL ri Washington free es , 9792 Edmonds Way Suite #123 Edmonds VIA. 98020 office:206-362-3380 * 425-771.-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed.:DJt' 91 L007614 N UEI # 601-960-331 Submitted To: LIlln UVI.I 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone # 920-699-2229 $2,000,000 Liability Coverage N Contractor # washite926mrr Estimate Date Time of Fs3mate Reference f# 8-4-09 LL 1 06-9362 BID We hereby propose to furnish material and labor to complete the work outlined here In for the sum of: plus sales tax Added Info liiinwu@gmail.com We accept al! major credit cards vaiiat?ons from this proposal or alterations requiring extra labor or material will be performed only upon written order and billed in addition tc the sum covered by this contract. Agreements made with our foremen are recognized. Necessary Perrdts are pr,.,^ ,l responsibility. TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON JOB COMPLETION. IF BALANCE IS NOT,.PAID WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE WILL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOTE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 250/* OF THE APPROVED JOB WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED JOB DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above specifications, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (I)(we) hereby authorize the peNforrnance of thl Eshmator CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONT?.ACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER 9 Nov 24 09 02:21 p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.4 E ASSESSMENT FOFA All sections gtfts fblM must be fu/f�t,Omp%ted by agypgried cnyfessional. (A hazard tree must] hen a tatget("w�ithin ? .5x the Height of the tree.) Site/Address: ! 5 jlJ � sd ��It�1 �' Y 'i VY Map✓Location_ Owner public priv2te_2C,_ unknown other Date: 10 W _ �q:— Name of Tree Assessor. J-on n (T %) $ ISA;,�w WZ' 9 Other Professional CertiScates and Qualfficatiotls: TREE CHARACTEWSTiCS TYoe 9; DBH: �+�1 , Ooftrualm HecghL23 _Sproad Q_ Form 0genemny symmetr.c ] -irw asymmetry rstump sprcul C; g d Cronin Gass: Xdqo:rlkmnt 0 co-don-Inant 0 irdemtecfate O supiaessed Live mown ratio: �.l,e' %, Aga et mW. ❑ytxtng O serltrmaMse X10ure l3ever-mature/senescerd Pruning History. Dcrown cleaned IIe wesdWIY thinned Otoppad Atom raised 13 poparded Derown reduced Oflush cuts CcadedlIxaeed 0 none O midlipL p.uadng aunts Approx dares Spedal Value: 0speoimen IIneri=9&' 'WWic Owldite Clumisua! Ostreet tree Oscreen 0-b-deAnrfigertots Elprotected by goo agency TREE HEALTH FopageCover,, 9wma1OchronicOnecrotic Epicormiss7 Yo N Growth obstructions: FoliegaDeceRy: &grxmar0spa+re Leaf sisBe�rrorma►tismaf! ❑stales ❑wke/riss Dstgns ❑cables Annual shoot growih.C3excel!enkk!(Average Cl poor bring Dieback7 Y N C rats pave.—r. 0 guards L Woundwood developmer7A:Oe=ae-1,39Perage OPeor Duarte -)26ther PASS rt 1 Vigor class: Oexcellan' J!Jpverago 0 farr OPrror Major peeWdsesses• t4 >� SITE CONDITIONS Site Chwvmftr--krctdence0commercialQindlstr:at Opek l3apenspaceOnatural Owoadardflerest Leadscape type: O parlavay O raised bred ❑ cortlairm 13 mould O tawn 0stmb ! order O Sind break Irrigatiorc �*. O adequate ❑ Itradeque'e 0 excessive ❑ trunk wetiled Hecent she disturbance? Y O ❑ construction L3 sal dsbomrice 0 grade change 0 ►ina clearing ❑ sre clearing % driptirto paved; ON 10-25% 25-50i6 50-75% 75-100% Pavement liked? ON 'A driptsis w/ M60i1: 0% 25° 25-50% 50-751% 75-1C0% *A dripitne grade lowered: 016 10.25 25-50% 50-75% 75'.00% Son Problems: 0drainage OsnaDaw Z3ccpaded Gdroughty 0salie Dalkatme 0zci6c 0wrallvolar7e ❑diseasecemer0h;storyoffan Oclay 0 expansive 0 aspect obstruatbons: ❑ fights 0 sgnags O tine -of --sits L3 t,35w O overM�d Cma ❑ undemjmund uti7ibes ❑ bafric Oadjacent veg. rl Fspoetue to wind C srtrgle tree D baknv canopy f3 above canopy Only exposed*ind-ar ceropy edge 'O ame prone to windthrow Prevailing wind doecUon; .-aJW oCcurrerice of..r. M.. 0 rf , )&�ddorn 0 regu:ady TARGET UseUnderTm- )%Pui;ding DH:�aklriiy CtttatBc Op--des-,.an Oreerzadm Oraut;e^epa Qtrardscam 0",-;faaknes C3uY0lyp,,8; Can target be moved? Y N© Can use be restfcted? Y G3�y � Uccupency: u occssicnat um ❑irtmmit►ent use l3trequare use /Jr4---t use 2 Nov 24 09 02:21 p Leslie Yarbrough r: 206-362-3011 p.5 .• TREE DEFECTS ROOT OIEFECi'S: ``M''ustnoo nrconrvc�t P Y Suspect coal rat: Y 01 ID /, ExPoeod reaw .O cavern ate 0 low Underemed: Os�evere . oderaze Cjlavr Root pruned: Root area a(rexled % Buttress vmueded lo N tplm M/ f1 Roslricted root area: pseve a �W»oderate t3 lo•N Pde-fiaf formot fa3ure: Osevere k<rraderete Glow LEA - deg.110M verbal pnatural 13-2t uat 0 se11-eoneeted Sort hearing: Y O Decay in Plana of k wu Y © Rnosabralrerre Y O Soil erecift-t Y Comtroursding lactsm. Lean seloAty: a severe O moderate U row DEFECT _ - -- -- HOOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poortaper aow. Sweep Codomtnentallorks Multiple attachmerds Included bark Excessive end weight Cracksisplils Ha•^•9ers Girdling Munds/sean+ Decay Cavity ConkstmushroowTtaftacket Bleedtng!sep Row Loose/cracked bark Ncating :totdlbee hive Deadwoodlstubs Borera/temniteslards CankerwgWistburls Previous feikrre RATING t Tree port mostlBretyiofatt W t Fa7rrepc4CnPaJ:1.4our, 2-rnedlum; 3-high; 4-severe I Inspection period mnrcrt tliarruro other j Size of part: 1- <V 2 - 8-18" (15-4S em}; Failure Potential + Size Part + T-Qat RaCng a HazamMu r 3-18-30- (45-75 cmr A - ,M- (75 cm] s +1, i Teasel .alirx}: ' - occasional u:.e., 2 - interrrtittent use; j ABATEMENT 1 3 - frequent use; 4 - coratenl use jI Prune: Oremove defective part O reduceend wergto Ocrorsn clean 0 ihst Owise car oay ❑ cmvrr► mdxe ❑ nMnwtufe O sfmpa Cabte/araow hrspeatfurther. prcntcrown Cdecay {]aerial Dmortity Removetrea? Y N. Replace? Y M marerargat? Y !J other: Eftectonadjaeenttreex Onone ❑evatuate Notification: ❑*wrier ❑manager Q goverriing agency Date: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ..:.._..4..,�a�..�.ua::u:/f;u-e"":•e�..ti+t'.4):..�:J:.-�a4Y..;;_,-._., _'T"'l:r;"-.!0�I •��, - H Nov 24 09 02:22p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.6 ` E AISSESSMENT FOOA sit! seC>iions of 9 s form MI s>Y be A&V completed by a qualified ne oiftesstanat. (A haZtd tree must have a target VAWn 1.5x the height of the tree.) Site/Address: 1 vL f-6 g mWLocation: A 2— Owrter- pubbc private_ _ cmkhowr{t� [other Date: 10�3 Q� Name ofTresA ssol 4t �f1t'111 Y'rQ JS fSAt Mer Professional Certificates and QWlifications: TREE CHARACTER15TiCS Tree f: Spews. 71(`%u DBIt -�2-got trunks "Oghf Spread: Form: Oeretterallysymmetric ❑minorasymmeby Ostumpoprout Ostag-headed Crovm Class: I(¢lorrriineM 0 co -dominant 0 Intermediate 0 supRassed We crown>'a1io: `y% Ago class: ❑young ❑semfmaWro „k�gmwre i3am-maturdsenescem Pruning History: ❑crown cleaned oexcesetuety ttrtrvied 0topped )*orvn raised OpoBmded 0 _roam reduced Oflush cute Otabled/braced 0 none 13 multiple pacing events Appro)L da es: Special Value: ❑spedmen Oherttage/fuistoric ❑wildlife Oummral ❑street tree Oscrean ❑shade ❑indigenous ❑prctected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage Coven)jf.nolrmal Qchmnic❑necroW Efilconcies? Y © Grovdh coat %cations Foliage Dernsifr- ormaf 13 sparse Leat sin:eMormal0small ❑ sakes ❑ woe/ ies Oslgm ❑ cab'es Annual moot growitrOexcellent*-rage ❑ poor Ticig Dieback? Y N O curb/pauem. n! O guards Woundwood devsfbpmexrt❑excelfarttj![�iven:ge ❑peon Oncne Dotter Vigor class: Qexceaem11veaage 13 Wr Opoor N ajor pesWdbeases: SITE CONDITIONS site character:`M�esidenceOcammerciWOindustial OparkUomnWaco 0natural ❑toodindnorest Isnoscape type Q ply ❑ raised bed O contain O moxId O lam ❑ shrub bordar O r mud break Imigenon: kellone ❑ 8oequald O tiadequaw D excessive ❑ trunk weWcd Recent site disturbance? Y ® O carstntatan ❑ soit G grade rh ge 0 fine clearing O site clearing % dripiinle paved: 09l 10-2596 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N 9t driplins w/fill aol:' 096 111-25% 25-" 50-75% 75-100% % driptina grade towered: 096 70-25 25-50% 5C-75%G 75-100% SoiJproblems: ❑drainageOshalaur ❑compacted Ddrougl*Osafim Oalkel:ne []acidic ❑ small vdur:te [3ckeasecentorj]ttfs,oryotlall ❑ day O exparsive O stop_ ? O aspect Ubstrtretrorrs: O lights Osignage O rure-of-dta O vaw ❑ overtltd fines M undeground utilities ❑ oaffic ❑adiace.-n veg. ❑ Exposuretowind; Osingleuee Woweanopy oat—ecm-py flrecennyexposed ❑wsnit alA anapyedge ❑area prone towindlfxaw Prevarhrrg wind direction: - 1/� Gc=france of srwwhee sterns ❑ never -<Isaidom O regularly TARGET use urctlerT'-c 26u9d'rng OM*ing ❑ tratfic Opedestrian Or_aeaion Ohardscape OsrrcJ{ aaRrr_s ❑utility rums Can target be rnoved? Y a Can use be m5ukted? y Occupancy, ❑ occasionw use Olmenniiterg use Dtrequem the .�enstmt use Nov 24 09 02:22p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.7 TREE DEFECTS acoTnr-FECTs: Suspect root rot Y O IV6ahroortJeonklbraclaet presett Y Exposoerocts; 0=vwo Omodwale Ai. Undermmerk Osevere Onaclemed6. Root pruned Root area a✓d j9.6 Buttress asunder Y N Vvnen: Restricted root p m woo =lsevere oderate ql;. Po'entlat for root lalfure: CJserere ❑-odarate LEAN_ deg.h0mvWftC t ❑nalura! Ooratabrral j]SBY-oanecled Soil►reavins: Y Q Decay in prone al lean: Y © Roots broicem Y L/Dl�i Boa ameionw -e Camm. ending fa05ors: Lean seventy: ❑ severe Gr moderaw U raw �wMnr�fs l..tt„rl Cr,}pyy11/ LIEFEGlS rnco�es Aaaam DEFECT m ROOTCROWN _ _ - _ _ TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper saw, --ap Cedorrdnra+ts/forlra Mu-tiple attachments Inducted bark Excessive end v+ei4d Crecks/eplits Hangers ei rdwtq wounde/seam Decay Cavhy Contmhnushmoms/Madcet Bleeding/sap flow Looselowked hark NWIng hotdluee hive Deadwood/stutts Bore+B/tenniteslerAB Cankersigalls/burls Previous failure RATING Tree pan most ll)w?y to felt. Inspection period annual biannual —other Fatter IPotential + Sae Part * Target � _ — ABATEMENT Failure potendat: 1-law 2-mclurrs 3-high; asevero Size or pars: 9 - c6. 2 - 6-98- (15-45 cm); 3 - t8-30' (45-?5 cmX 4 - >.?0' (?5 cm) Target rating: 1 - occasional use* 2 - irdermittent use; 3 - I.mgvmt use; 4 - corstud use Prune: ❑remove defective part Omduce end weigh Ocrown clew[ Odds: Ors+ campy rjcw l reduee O Wructtlre O shape Cable/Sraee: - Inayeettvritrer Oroolerown Odecay Ctamial Omonitw Remove tree? Y N Rephwel Y N mme target? Y N On w.. Q[ecIanadjaeerritrees: Dcwna Oewluate Notd ouNom ❑ omm.- ♦]manager ❑ governing ageraty Dtatc SIGNATURE OF PROFESStONALL dated M Nov 24 09 02:23p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p•8 AEE ASSESSMENT FO All seatiolls of this form must be futlTt/ corrtMeted by a qualified arwfessional. gA hazard bee must have a target within 1.5x the haW of the tree.) Site/Address: !$� 3 Q�-=-`-T-f C V i je iN nr map/location: 3 Qwiter pul fic Private imlumwn_ { �A tt tot i� Name of Tree Assessor. `t"' Yi 1 F-P�V Uy ��S ISA PN Other Professional Certificates and Qualifications' TREE CHARACTERISTICS Two Di3t1: � � r a cf�Wfnks Form: OgeneraeysynVr4Kr Jdm1neresyn'i^nelrY Qslumpsprme Ostag-heeded Crown Class: f�Qaor�ninard O co-deminza ❑ Intermediate O suppressed Live Drown ralio: OV 9ti Age etas: Dyoang 0 senwmatLae /ware O over—ature/senescent Pruning History Ocrown cleaned 0 excBssivp?Y th nned DtepPed)e... raised 13Pa1atled 0. reduced Onush cuts Ocatiedibraced ❑ now 0 mL foe pruning everts Approx. d+l— Special tfalue: Osper*wnen Oheritegefhisrmic OvwiUFie Ounarsual Osteeet tree Oscreen OSsaea. Wdgauxrs Oprotected by got: agency TREE HEALTH r-otlage Cover,4=mal [chmnicpneantic Epiconm vr,? Y © arwmh obetmai-m rwriwVeneity: 6ormal13spame Qstaites ❑j%&eAles Gsgas ❑cabbles Annual shoot growrh:Oe=etiernIaverage l3Pcor TwAg Msbeck? Y N ❑ c rWpavement ❑ guards Woundwood devttopmwI:0exee4ent)<pwaga ❑P+>m Ono- o cther Vigor clam E)&x e.ard 7Araverage O fair Opoor Major pestakfteases: SITE CONDITIONS BkeChnraeter. estdenceOtarmwercielOirndustrtaf Dpark OopenspaceQn=fZ Owcediand•":orest Landscapetype.- ❑ parkway O raised iced 0 contavter O metod O lawn O s:aub border G wind break "Baliom . 0 adequate O IrwxkKV- le ❑ owassive ❑Munk n*W_-d Hecernt slte'dsrurbartce? Y p constructor, ❑ wa distt irbence O w ft change ❑ rme clearing 17 site clearing % dripline paved: 0% 10-251,10 25-511154 5076% 75-=94 Pavement rifled? Y N %dnpffneWIVIRsoil: 0% 10- 25-50% 50-75% 75-IW% % dripline grade lowered: 09G 10-25% . 25-5b7a 50a59b 75-100% Soil problems: O aralnage Osrkinow 0oompacled Ddroughty ❑ saline 0aIlWine O acdc 0 small vokune Odisease center rJ" history of fall O ctay O mpmmwe O slope-7 0 anstrudionax ❑ fights ❑ sigrxW ❑ irre-of-site O view ❑ Cverttead lines C underground utaities G traffic DWcentveg. a emosure to Mound: 0 single free " a canopy O above campy D racentty.Vosed 0 windward; cwr l edge ❑ area pone to wirrdthrow PrevaWng wind ditecfion: Siic� occsrance d 3rwwAee.Uxr. % O never -'Kealdorn 0 mgutarlY TARGET usaurrderTree:-WWIdling DPWWW ❑tBtFc OpedasWa/n �❑rtcreaation Otandscapa 0hadW*P0 OWWfietures Outirdylines Can target be moved? Y D Can use tie t�rcicedd Y t,,f�r occupancy. U occasional use Otraenirthent use 01raquent •use -:Z� :tse Nov 24 09 02:23p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.9 TREE DEFECTS ROOTaEF2;Ci5: � Y Suspedtrootrot Y V trhrstaoorrVcov+vadpresaNr mow 6:eooeod room: ❑severe Qmoderale � Undarcncrest i7 severe D moderate Root prunedr _ tidal area aHaete�d: Sfr Suttross vrounded Y O Wnem Q n1O o Potentiat for root ta2ura: ❑severe O moderate aw Reateleted roof areac Dae�ere Soil rdrawng: Y (2)_ iFAAC deg. horn verti®l pnatural tpnr>rta><v:ntself-corrected in of teen: Y � Reob brokerc Y N Sob cracking- Y N � Domw plane Lean sev rW. D severe Q moderate ) Compounding factot� CFtOtVNNOEFEC75:lnprax++ceorrmmaua��@...•a•,••...•.._.__..,.------•--- DEFECT RIJOTCROWN TRUNK ------ - - SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor:apar Bow, Sweep C0danrt7rarrt5Aorh3 Muttlpte attachments fnCIu084 tNtrlk Excessive end weight Crackslsplifs Hangers Girdling 'Noundsreeam Decay cavity Conkslmu shrooms/baacket Readvoisap flow Looselwarked btuk Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood(stubs Borers armiteslarrts t ;ankerstga Wburte Previous failure RATING Tree port most likely to sell: C row I 1 inspection period annual biarwua o^Jter Faiexe I entia +Size of Pal . ,agety aaurg o Hazard Ralir>5 ABATEMENT F2,1we potential: 14ovr, 2-nedlum; 3-high; 4-severe Sizoolpait 1-<6' 2-6-18^(tfi-45em); 3 -18-W- (45-75 cm); 4 - >30" (75 an) Taret ra5nc: i - ccczsionw use; 2 - irdermitten: use; 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use Prune: ❑remove dderAhm part ❑reduce end weight ❑craven clean ❑thin ❑reiae canapy Oaown reduce O restr%wkn ❑ shape Cable/brace: Inspeatfurther.0matcrawn Odecay ❑3a" OmOritm iteroovetree? Y N Reptecerf Y N Movetwwt? Y N OUeC Hfeet on sdjaeent teens: Onone GevakWo Notifloetforc ❑ axvner Qmanager Q govemGg agency Date: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL 12 rr r l� "� k h i� � -� y a t 1 Permit No.: NFNU'M "Tree RemoAITTrimming Permit 1615 Rev.05/07 Permission is hereby granted to the Public Utility District No.1 of Snohomish County, its successors and/or assigns to: )O/RMV .......................... Remove as marked, stumps left to'be no higher' -than six (6) inches from ground, if possible. ❑ ST ............................. Side trim (Limbs may be trimmed flush with the trunk). ❑ RTS Brush ................. Remove to Specs all Brush & Tree Brush (includes Vine -Maple, Hazelnut, Salal, Salmonberry, etc.). ❑ RTS Tree Brush .......... Remove to Specs all Tree Brush less than 5" in diameter at any height; free Brush consists of BLM (Big Leaf Maple); ALD (Alder); CAS (Cascara); WIT. (Willow); COT (Cottonwood); HEM (Hemlock); CHY (Wild Cherry); and LOC (Locust). ITS ............................ Trim for 12' of clearance from primary conductor, unless otherwise specified. ❑ DL ............>................. Drop and Leave; Trees cut down, wood and branches left for customer cleanup. ❑ Top and Shape .......... Top and Shape: Cut 2' below phone/communication/cable, unless otherwise specified. XNOBW ....................... Notify Owner Before Work and further to cut and remove underbrush that might endanger or interfere with the maintenance or operation of the PUD's electrical facilities that are upon or adjacent to property of the undersigned, at the following location: Fielding notes: � :%NeV F;E _ . CA09 Total Tree Removals over five (5) inches DBH: It is understood thar.the work shall be done with care, at no expense to me, and the trimmings removed by said Public Utility District. It is;also understood that all wood larger than five inches (5") in diameter will be left on site in four -foot (4') lengths for my use unless otherwise stated., Owner Signature: X Owner Name: ,L L Vl w L'A_ Address: � -1 ?J O oy V" A I Cy t c w De- City/State/Zip: dFd wl Q K 6 S (��5 020 Phone (Home): Phone (Work): ) Date: " 2 ! I W.O. / Task No.: Notifier Name: Tas k r (- Z Notifier Phone: 4z5 ' —i63 r If you have any questions regarding the tree -trim work, please contact me at the number listed above or call 425-783- 5594. Please complete, sign and date. Return the white copy in the enclosed envelope. Please complete, sign and date. Retain canary copy for your records. Return white copy in enclosed self-addressed, postage -paid envelope. Clugston, Michael From: Clugston, Michael Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:33 PM To: 'yaoyutian@gmail.com' Subject: Tree cutting permit - incomplete application Good afternoon Mr. Yao, I was looking through your tree cutting application (PLN-2009-0054) and I had a few questions. I see three hazard assessments for the larger trees that are proposed to be cut but I didn't see one for the smaller evergreen near the southeast corner of your house (see attached photo). That tree also needs a hazard assessment. Also, I have some concern about your "next year plan" and the future retaining walls. It looks like there are a number of other trees and landscaping in the space between the walkway and Olympic View Drive where the future retaining walls are planned (see photo). If additional trees and vegetation need to be removed in order to install the retaining walls, another tree cutting permit would be necessary. If additional removal is anticipated, it may be better to consider that with this permit than doing this all over again next year. That said, the four trees that are proposed to be removed now must be replaced 2:1 with native species somewhere on site and I am not sure where these are going. There is a row of trees shown along Olympic View Drive on the "next year plan" and I believe these are proposed but I don't know what kind of trees they are and whether they would fit with the rest of the existing vegetation. Here is the specific code that must be complied with regarding removal and replacement in critical areas (ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b): b. The removal of trees from critical areas and buffers that are hazardous, posing a threat to public safety, or posing an imminent risk of damage to private property; provided, that: i. The applicant submits a report from an ISA- or ASCA-certified arborist or registered landscape architect that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for the replacement trees; ii. Tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified by a qualified professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be removed or converted to wildlife snags; iii. All vegetation cut (tree stems, branches, etc.) shall be left within the critical area or buffer unless removal is warranted due to the potential for disease or pest transmittal to other healthy vegetation or unless removal is warranted to improve slope stability; iv. The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of two replacement trees for each tree removed (two to one) within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan. Replacement trees may be planted at a different, nearby location if it can be determined that planting in the same location would create a new hazard or potentially damage the critical area. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a minimum of one inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from the top of the root ball; v. If a tree to be removed provides critical habitat, such as an eagle perch, a qualified wildlife biologist shall be consulted to determine timing and methods of removal that will minimize impacts; and vi. Hazard trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, to public or private property, or of serious environmental degradation may be removed or pruned by the land owner prior to receiving written approval from the city; provided, that within 14 days following such action, the land owner shall submit a restoration plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of this title; Because of the missing hazard assessat for tree #4 and lack of a proper restorateplan, your application is currently incomplete. Once these items are submitted, I will continue with the review of the application. If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Mike Clugston, AICP Planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department P: 425-771-0220 1 F: 425-771-0221 michael.clugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us Yao tree cut Yao google aerial .... pdf (19... treet.pdf (243 KB).. r` —y, 1+ 'r .moo � � - �,,yt v-Im, r LL •i M+S ._; .{ ' �.~��i"�F'i �w� � ,.r,,,rvt,,., '��tt�� I "SE.w � y+�y= - i. #.4jy .1 • ,� � r , c Crc k'` •FF •, w. r-O Y%4 < t t sNi r t'`i-w,., t � r '4�� F s7'k{'s.-"=%�' � v� q. _ 'c`� �r r .�, 7 x•{ h .. ,�S "�`." � � 71 19 JlJ T _ i t, '` y't� .._. , x.i-~� a . �� t 1;:�• a jt i ^� l-ti` bxy-sti"� L,c9" a ': t� '�E :,ins �j� ^.i �h� t �-��.,l rl- �, Ja#�s�T r' �` � �°�r'' t,�`. ' '•.P. �L. :;f y ry,�� j �• y^,� i y�i,i1 �"�)yylv".�'e,�• A tf�a �"rP ..-a.. if✓. G r � � t`'3$ ,xt e 'b11t� i.". ar '�+ cak' t�`. . �l.- �dr• .+� I r - L y_�"�.-4....'^�\..,. � �Rff..e ..., :.n4. :Y-'•. .i.ti, �..._: .++ - i•.J`.tb-' Google Maps 0 4) Page 1 of 1 Goo*maps Address Save trees. Go green! Download Google Maps on your phone at googlexom/gmm ------------- ----- --- - - -- - - http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18430+olympic+view+drive %2Bedmonds,+wa&oe=UT... 11 /17/2009 CITWF EDMO_NDS,,. PLANNING.DIVISIF =REQUEST FOR COMMENT FORM ❑ Engineering ❑ FiFe Public Works ❑Parks & Rec ❑ B6i1;8 ng Treatment Plant ❑ Ec'oriomid Dev �4 In Project Number: PLN20090054 Applicant's Name: YUTIAN YAO Property Location: 18430 OLYMPIC VIEW DR Date of Application: 11 /12/09 Date Form Routed: 11 /13/09 Zoning: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL "PER ECDC,20.02.005'ALL COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF, THE DATE THIS FORM 'WAS ROUTED.: ,:11:30.09 If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MICHAEL CLUGSTON Ext. 1330 Name( of Individual Submitting Copm Title: I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): --rK A l �-�-` SCtt�U CAI, rr�CL � -A ST l.�E�►L -- 1�0-'`�JoS � � - �� -`� 1 �v The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date: fl— 1 ^%--o Signature: Phone/E-mail: �' t(o--� `F CITOW EDMONDS -'PLANNING DIVISIW REQUEST FOR COMMENT FORM ❑ Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ Public Works .❑ Parks & Rec. ❑ Building ❑ Treatment Plant ❑ Economic Dev. Project Number: PLN20090054 Applicant's Name: YUTIAN YAO Property Location: 18430 OLYMPIC VIEW DR Date of Application: 11 /12/09 Date Form Routed: 11 /13/09 Zoning: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL **PER ECDC 20.02.005 ALL. COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE DATE , THIS FORM WAS ROUTED:: 11.30.09 If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MICHAEL CLUGSTON Ext. 1330 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title: ❑ 1 have reviewed this land use proposal ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no DEPARTMENT so I have provided comments. My department may also comments or conditions below or review this project during the building attached. permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date: Signature: Phone/E-mail: Tar-:: city of edmonds land use application DECEIVE N 0 V 12 iv':: DEVELOPMENT SERVICt. COUNTER ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW • • • ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT , f ;W CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # PL1 2o,9� VO ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE i I Z d REC'D BY ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION �J ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE b S- �O RECEIPT # ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE VTAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION ��'' ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION Y� 30 PROJECT NAME (IF APPLIIC/ABL'E,�)/ /, ,, / ,/ PROPERTY OWNER L /`-'' N �"" U k Y(� 7- 'V !140 PHONE # `f''J^ 1? 2- t�Fn ADDRESS )(O Oo 0 � C V/FiGcJ f) r. 'uh /aF, E-MAIL ya0 Ya i�vt- ® ? mor /. C 0 11-q FAX # 7 J^ - ?2 - p Br�U TAX ACCOUNT # d 0 s --D ©d z c:70 20 3 SEC. TWP. RNG. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) VA - APPLICANT \ �I l 0 PHONE # ADDRESS 1,%3o ✓tP,W D%/, WA ?fO z-,-, E-MAIL �/� ya fI Ax Co FAX # <Zld =Sf- L - W911j CONTACT PERSON/AGENT �/% >11471 A /V /-� ,/ �� PHONE #/1 `�"� ' Sf 2 —OlS,7� ADDRESS `a 4� �`�f'N�!iG V,i�A or. �-z�`�� wiz 9f0?� p E-MAIL IGLU YU �%GAL o ��%/%�� (, Co kv, FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. p SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT _ `�� "� DATE // /A 7 � T Property Owner's Authorization I, , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE This application form was revised on 8/10/09. Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. L:\LIBRARYTLANNING\Forms & HandoutsTublic Handouts\Land Use Application.doc Statement of proposal regarding tree removal RECEIVED NOV 12 2009 November 3, 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Home owner: Lilin Wu & Yutian Yao Home address: 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA98020 Trees to be removed: The tree on northeast corner of the house is only 5"-6" from the building. The roots have cracked the concrete foundation. (See attached `First Choice Home Inspection page 5') The tree on north side of the property near the parking spot, the roots have damaged the main water pipeline coming into the house between the meter and house. (See attached `First Choice Home Inspection page 13' ) The tree on northwest corner of the house and the tree on north side of the house near by deck are too close to building. The home owner will hire a licensed tree company (Washington Tree Experts) to remove the three big trees (2 Cedar, 1 Doug Fir) and the home owner will remove the Hemlock tree (DBH 12", 35'high) themselves, which is located on the northeast corner of the house. (See attached plot plan) The job is scheduled on November 12 and 13, 2009 The home owner plans to build two retaining wall between the house and the parking spot and plant 10-15 smaller trees on east side near the property line sometime in the next year. (See attached plot plan) F 0 cn Firl --.4 m a �Q ;I- I 0 Record 05142009 - Wu, Ulin 18430 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 Hazard or Wood Destroying: Condi#ion _ FEXTER'10R Exposed Foundation On the NE comer and a the mid point of the north wall there are structurally concerning cracks in the foundation (pic ,2). These cracks may be due to the tree located near this side of the foundation. Further evaluation and corrections by a structural engineer are needed. The crack on the NE comer is offset indicating significant movement. On the interior side of the NE comer there are a couple of cracks in the cement floor (pic 3,4). One of the cracks is in dose proximity to the large crack on the exterior and the other is across the room. Further investigation and corrections needed. Summary: Page 5 of 16 First Choice Home Inspection • 0 Record 05142009 - Wu, Lilin 18430 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA 98020 Water Source The main water supply pipe between the meter and the house is ruptured and needs to be repaired by a licensed plumber (pic 1). Water is bubbling up from the ground at the end of the pavers nea the front porch. The entire plumbing system should be evaluated by a licensed plumber. This is recommended due to the number of fixtures that not installed and the suspected remodel that may not have been permitted or inspected. Monitor or Improve The item will require monitoring and improvement anytime in the next five years Summary: Page 13 of 16 First Choice Home Inspection 0 0 NELSON G EOTECH N ICAL GA ASSOCIATESq' INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Main Office 17311 —13e Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 FAX (425) 481-2510 (425) 337-1669 Snohomish County November 10, 2009 Mr. Yutian Yao 18430 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical Engineering Letter Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington NGA File No. 821009 Dear Mr. Yao: Engineering -Geology Branch 437 East Penny Road Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 665-7696 FAX (509) 665 7692 RECEIVED NOV 1 2 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER This letter summarizes our recommendations for some tree removal at your residence located at 18430 Olympic View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. INTRODUCTION You are planning to remove four large, mature trees from your property, one which had damaged the foundation of your residence, and one that has damaged a water line. We visited the site and met with you on November 4, 2009. We observed that the front portion of your property is bowl -shaped with steep slopes on all sides. You. have requested that we observe the area and provide recommendations for removing the large trees. Site Conditions The property is a roughly rectangular -shaped lot covering approximately 0.3 acres. The front portion of the site is a bowl -shaped feature and is steeply sloping down to the west towards a flat area next to the residence. It appears that some of the slopes contain fill material from the construction of the existing driveway on the southern side of the area, and the parking pull-out area to the east. Several mature trees are located in this area in front of the house, located at the toe of the slopes; on the slopes, and at the top Geotechnical Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 2 of the slopes. The trees are approximately 8 to 36 inches in diameter. The trees that are planned to be removed are: a large cedar tree located at the toe of the slope next to the northeastern comer of the residence. The second is a large cedar located within the flat area at the toe of the slopes, a fir tree located at the top of the slope, just west of the driveway pullout area, and a hemlock located at the top of slope next to the southeastern comer of the residence. The geologic units for this area- are shown on the Preliminary Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, by Mackey Smith (USGS, 1975). The site is mapped as Whidbey Formation (Qw) and is described as sand silt and clay. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the planned tree removal is feasible and should not adversely impact the site slopes. We recommend that the stumps remain after the trees are cut. Care should be taken as to not disturb the steep slopes during tree removal. If any areas that are disturbed should be compacted and covered with erosion control material. Disturbed areas should be planted as soon as practical and the vegetation should be maintained until it is established. In general, protection of the slopes should be performed as required by the City of Edmonds. Specifically, we recommend that the top of slope not be disturbed or modified through placement of any fill or removal of the existing vegetation. No material of any kind should be placed on the slope or be allowed to reach the slope, such as excavation spoils, lawn clippings, and other yard waste, trash, and soil stockpiles. Trees should not be cut down or removed from the slope except as described above. Any proposed development within or near the slopes should be the subject of a specific geotechnical evaluation. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to concentrate on the steep slopes. USE OF THIS LETTER NGA has prepared this report for Mr. Yutian Yao and his agents for use in the planning and budgeting for the tree removal on this site only. The scope of our work does not include services related to NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 3 construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. .M NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechmcal Engineering Letter Yao Tree Removal Edmonds, Washington November 10, 2009 NGA File No.821009 Page 4 It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project: If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Khaled M. Shawish, PE Principal BD:KMS:lann Three Copies Submitted One Figure Attached NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. C a a) C0 E s ca J y O H O z Project Number NELSON GEOTECNNICAL No. Date I Revision By ICK 821009 Yao Residence ----NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 »sm Jorigined oPN Bo Site Plan GEOTECHN/CAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS it Figure 1 ,n„-IOMP—Nk"M DECEIVED SSCT"re NOV 12 2009 •c'Z' �a r DEVELOPMENT SERVICE oy" COUNTER yt rxa9 a WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SNOHOMISH COUNTY BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN Short Plan for Clearing, Grading, Remodeling, and Single Home Construction Not for Forest Practice Applications, Subdivisions, Short Plats, or Conversions RCW 77.12.655, WAC 232-12-292 TERRITORY Hatt Park 517 _2 Occurrence # Nest # ACTIVITY _Remove 4 trees that are damaging property CONDITIONS: The following conditions apply to the entire parcel or lot. ❑ CONDITION 1: This lot is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Any construction or vegetation removal on this lot requires a site -specific Bald Eagle Management Plan. The landowner must contact and consult with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) prior to any clearing or construction. Contact the WDFW at (425) 379-2301. ►� CONDITION 2: This lot occurs > 400 feet from a bald eagle nest but within a bald eagle management area. Retain all known perch trees and all conifers >24 inches diameter at breast height (d.b.h). Retain all cottonwoods >20 inches diameter at breast height (d.b.h). Also retain >50% of pre -clearing or pre -construction conifer stand with diameter distributions representative of the original stand (>6 feet tall). Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above condition(s) placed on Parcel actual street address of 18430 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98020 If the conditions set forth above are acceptable, please sign below and this will serve as your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. 10`-e_4 28 October 2009 District Wildlife Biologist Signature (Date) Zd?.t- �;15 4'00Z'� Regional Wildlife Biologist Send Copy To: Ruth Milner La Conner, WA 98257 Fax: 360-466-0515 941tN�X_ Landowner Signature (Date) Yy7_1141\1 AD Landowner Name (Print) Address - 4(2-S'-s821 - 8'$5g Phone number RLMCounty/City Short Plan: Oct 25, 2009 Nov 02 09 02:19p Leslie Yarbrough 2 62-3011 p.1 A RECEIVED Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way #1.23 NOV i 2 2009 Edmonds, WA 98020 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 206-362-3380 COUNTER staff(a,washingtontreeexuerts.com October 30, 2009 Client: Location: RE: removal_ Tree 2: Mr. and Mrs. Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA Tree identification and hazard evaluation to satisfy permit requirements for Doug Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) DBH = 37" approx height = 95' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 3 and 4) Observations: -tree has been wind topped -there is restricted root zone due to paving and grade -tree is stand alone in prevailing wind Tree 2: Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) DBH = 42" approx height = 75' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 5 and 6) Tree 3: Western Red Cedar ('fhuja plicata) DBH = 44" approx height = 70' (see attached map not to scale and reference pages 7 and 8) Observations: -tree is 6" to 12" away from house -there is root interference with the foundation of the home -root pruning is not recommended as it can compromise the structural integrity of the tree Prepared by Jennifer Wells Certified Consulting Arborist PN 46209A Nov 02 09 02:20p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.2 ` If 9 . Waiver of Liability This information represents the tree health assessment at this point in times My findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of fuktrc events. Information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. The inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible item without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring, I -A Nov 02 09 02:20p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.3 %EE ASSESSMENT F&M Ali sections of Phis faun must be fuffv completed by a qualiffed professianal {A hazard tree must have a target within 1.5x the height of the tree.} Map/Location: Owrw: public private_ unknown other Date: V D 3Q f Q� Name of Tree Assessor._ _an n r I TlY ISA;# P N iN CO2 a o a Chher Professional Certificates and Qualifications_ TREE CHARACTERiSTtcs Tree N. speciex� ldt2l� i.(i� aR- n 2 j es i i 0 of frunklL Height. u `�,�read:. �1 D Form: Ogenerally symmetric: ydntinar asymmeh;• c3stump sprout Ostag-headea cr*wn Class: Vdomtrrant O co-dominard 0 Intermediate O £uppressed Live crownrafio:-5-a96 Ageetass: ❑young 0serrirra[ura marureQaven-maiure/senescent Pruning History_ ❑crown cleaned Elexcessivelythinned 0toppedAr-aw:r OLSed0pplladWElcrnwnredueed pParshcuts OcaUed/braced O none D rnAiple Pruning everts Approx. dates Special 4alue: rJspeclmen ❑he»tagemLstanc pwilCiife Ounusual Ostreet free r2screen OshadA-dgeneus ❑protected by gov, agen cy TREE HEALTH Foliage CoverAorrral Ochrmic❑nee of c ' Eyecormies7�Y�wN Growth oostruetion= Foliage Density- Z fwrsu ❑ sparse Leaf si,04..Tial small L7 ❑ stalrez- G wl^e/ties nsigrts ❑ cab es Annual shoot gmvAkOexcelle-r9al rage 0poor Twig Dieback? Y . N O curb/pavement ❑ guards i Wound -odd developmentperacelle�verage Opoor Onone Vigor class:Oexcellent &-verago 0 fair Opoe- Major tteslsJdiseases: SITE CONDITIONS Site Character:resldence O eorrT Q;ndusid, i Gpzrr, Gopen space ❑ natural Owoadard/brest ' Landscape type CI pv—Y p raised bed Cl cr=irter O gmLnd fJ lawn ❑ Shrub border i] wind txeabt Irrigatlanc �*ome ❑ adequate ❑ Ir1zdequa,e ❑ excessive ❑ trunk v:e tad Hecenl sdo disturbance? Y O 17 corlstnu;Gorl ❑ soil disturbance O grade change ❑ line clearin g ❑ s8e clear,ng % c6iPtiRe Pa"ed; 0911, t0-ZS;S 2550'15 5u-7545 ; 5-100% Pavement rcfted7 CD N 'r drrpbne w/M so&: , 0% 255E 25-50% 50-75% 75-1005S % dripline grade lowered: 25 509e 0% 70-75^n 50-75% 75-10016 Soil problems: ❑drainage Oshaliow Ofe,_or-p ,.racted Odmughty, O siline ru'alkaline ❑acidic ❑ me ❑ <mall volume center [I history of fall GUay Dexftansiva Lislepe . O aspetK: Ohst-actions O lights O signage O tine cf-s`te O V*w 0 overhead limes O ur>de ,rid urdives + O rafFc Oadlscerrt veg.71 pto wind O single tree O belowmrxipy O above canopy O racerlfy exposed . wind-xartl, canopy edge O area prone to windthrow r Prevailing wind direction: Occuence of s,to%'Jfte S'orn s ❑ never` �)64eldom ❑ regulsrty TARGET Use underTree: ,-w1ding Xmrfting ❑,Talc a s P�s'san O,rEMaton 04ands-cape Oha,'dscape L�SMOleatLrs O7 eilityfinaS Can target be maveda Y (P Gan use ias restricted? Y U lk:cuoancy tJ oceasicna) use ❑ir4e rvtWnt use ❑trequent use Aonstard use 3 Nov 02 09 02:20p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.4 • 'FREE DEFECTS ACOT DEFECTS: f�1) Suspect root rot Y © (14trarooT.jccnk&rackLt present- Y t Alm t0: Expaaod roots.: ❑ aovom 1V.,odor2te 0 low Undermined: Qsevere-odsrate ❑low J Sootoruned: Root areaeNeeiedt % BuNresswounded YY N Wizen: Restricted root area ❑severe jVmoder M ❑ ?ow Poientiat for roof faaure: [severe moderate Olow LEAN dots} from retold [,nalumd ❑tlnnatum! ❑ self-oormcted Sail heaving: Y O away in Plano of Wan: Y ® Rootsbrokon: Y Q Soil praClRllg: Y Comaounding facx5: Lean nevelty: O sew:re ❑ moderate Li low CRO AM Wr—r- ; (ndkaba piesence of individual defer a and rate th r severity ts=severe- fit=moderate, Wow) DEFECT FOCI CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRA14CHES Poor taper Bow, sweep Codominanislforks Multiple attachments included boric Excessive end weight crackStspri is Hangers Girding Wounefs/seam Decay Canlra/muShroornsfbracket Sleeding/sap Now Loose/cracked bark Nesting hoA4xo hive Deadwoodfstubs Borer:-Remotes�ants t Cankerstgallwburls Previous failure RATING Tree cart most likely to faa: _L.�MVw4 r l inspection period anntcal biannnw o•Jrer Failure Potertiial + S'¢e 01 Pan . TargdReeing =H-aa&fWriq J ABATEMENT Failurepaterdtal: 1-10,*r, 2-medium; 3-high; 4-severe lie o1 Part: 1- a6" 2-ii-78" (75-45 cm); ' 3 - 18-30" (45-75 crn); -t - >30" (75 cm) Ta:ge t rating: 1 - occasional use; 2 - interm"ttent use: Prune: Oremovedefectivepart ❑raduccendneight Ocrownctean Oftn Omisecanopy. Ocrmvnnaduee ❑restructure ❑shape µ cahwlilrace: insPect f urther- Oroot crown Odecay Oae:ial ❑monitor Remove tree? Y N Replace? Y N gave target? Y N Oltw-= Effectonadjacentlrees: ❑none Devaluate Notffleation: powner ❑manager ❑govemingagency. pate: SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL Nov 02 09 02:21 p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.5 %EE ASSESSMENT FAM .4U S fs of Phis form must be fulty COMWeted by a aualrfied professional (A hazard tree must have a targzt within 1.5x She hekjht of the tree.) Site/Address: _ 1314 a O l V ET 0-V j P 1N ID r Map/Location: 4 2 Ovrtter: public private__ unknown +other y,, ` Dater)..3 Name of Tree Assessor.. t(1 r11 i -,V 1r O-1 11S ISA P Q� Other Professional Csrtificates and Qualifications: TREE CHARACTERISTICS BFlg' 7 _ Y or traeaks Species l Vl ~u ti ,� - He14hC C Spread: Form: *nera�ly//symmetric ❑minor asynTetry []slur ip s=ut ❑stag -headed Crown Gass: rninard D co dominant 0 intermediate 0suppressed Livacrown ralio- v% A99cW- ❑young 13serr:-mature -b4aUre pave:-matwe/senescent pruning lfistory: ❑crown cleaned ❑excessively thinned atopped 18Zotm raised Opotfazded Ocrown reduced ❑f:ush cuts OcabWtbraced O now ❑ multiple pruning everts ! pprox dales: SPedal Value: ❑specimen Oherttaoeanistoric ❑vdl&b L7wausual Osbeei tree ❑screen ❑shade ❑indigenous Oprotected by goy ag8/cy. TREE HEALTH Foliage Covergn��ormal ❑cbroniconecrotie £picprnies? Y r rovrlit dnstruoBons: Foliage Density- .-//ormall]sparse _. Leafs¢e:�Viorm r:sma?i ❑stakes pwinefties Qstgns Ocab tes Annual shoot grcwth:peucegen14—a9e ❑poor Twig pieback? Y N D carhlpavernent ❑ guards Woundwood developmenl:Qexcdlenl,'Pivera6e ❑poor ❑none ❑diner Yrgorcleat.gexcellerrf1:53uerage 0far Qpoor MAW pests diseases: SITE CONDI>•IONS She character. lx�Gaidence ❑ oem:merclat 0lrtdustrtal 0 pant CT open s - pacepnasural D�voodland/iorest Larxisoape type q parkway ❑raised bed Q co=irax D nw, ^ld D form 0snrub border %i '.rind break lrrrg&lk none I] adequate ❑ lrc-Jegua:a ❑ excessive El frank walled Aecerd site disturbance? Y ® q cortatrttrVor ❑ soil disturbance D 5-ade char e g ❑iine Bearing ❑ she clearitag % driPline paved: 0 10-250% 25-509 50-75% 75-1DG% Pavement lifted? Y N 4G dripline w/fdl so& ` 095 10-259b 23-501A 50-75% 75-100% % driprme grade louvered: 096 1d-25 25-50% 50-75% Soil problems: Q drainage Oshallow CI_pacted IJdroL;9* Qsa&ne C3alkzirte ❑ acidic Q small volume ❑disease center ❑history of fall ❑clay ❑ expa-Qit.+e ❑ slope lxtstructtons: ? Q aspen: !] lights ❑ signage ❑iine of Ste ❑ rev p overheadlines Q urtder9rowxl tf7it es ❑traffic. :Dad veg, 2, Cxpoaure to e.intt ❑ single hen ,�lBlow canopy ❑above canopy rJ rt~erray axPOsed D wbctffard, canopy edge ❑ area prone io windthrow Nreva ling wend direcfitm: Occurenc' of &'XrN5ce storms ❑ never -<seidom ❑ regularly TARGET Use UnderTiee: 25rb.3ding ❑pa7dng M.M. pFedEsrian Can target be moved? Y res nation rad-tapa 0,n ❑wna faaturas outlity itn^Sa © Can use be msttidea? V ry Occuoorrcy: ❑ occasional use ❑intenrittent use Otr uere uw eq �nstant use 5 Nov 02 09 02:21 p Leslie Yarbrough• 2062-3011 p.6 TREE DEFECTS RCO T DEFEC75: suspect root rot Y Q Wksshmornlconk(bradwt present: Y © n> Exrwsod roots 0 severe Ornoderae Xjow Undermi rsrt Osevere rJ modPra a yr Hoot prunerlh Rant area aftecte,/c � % Buttress waundect Y N W,1en: RaetnctW root ereac 0&&A" a roodeata �.rornv Patentie for mot fallum; Lnsevere ❑ moderate -*%w LF4N deg. from vertical []nahaa! QUnnasural vJ-corrected 5oilrreavtng: Y a Dacoy in plane of tears: Y © Roofs broken: Y Sall cracldng: Y CD Compounding factors: Lean severity: ❑ severo C3 moderate CROWN DEFFCM trudicate pramrrce of kxCvklu ' defects and rate then severity [5<sevem. Rwn6darate, I-toW) J ;ow DEFECT ROOTCROwN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poortapor Flow, sweep Codominants/larks Multiple attachmerds Inckided bark Excessive and weight Grackslsplils 4angers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay Cavity o nks/nmrvoornanxacket -31eeding!sap flour Loose/cracked bark Nesting holdlbea hive 0aadvvoodlstubs Borersttermiteshd nts Cankerslgallsibrrls Previous Wtve RATING Tree pert most lixely to fair Inspection period annual 5i2nntre otter Failure Poterrilal + 5¢e-af Part + Ta get Peting = Hazard Rating ABATEMENT Failure potential_ 1-lour, 2-rnedium: 3-high, 4-severe Size of part 1- c6° 2 - 6-18- (15-45 cmj 3-18-30' (45-75 cm); 4 - a34" 75 cm) Tagat rating: 1 - occasional use; 2 - intermittent me; 3 - frequent use; 4 - oonsmnt use Prune: OremovedetectivePart ❑reduceendweigh 0crownclean Lain 0rasecalmay ❑crownreduce ❑restructure Oshape Cablel8racm huPectFrrnter Oroot crown Odocay Oaarial 0monitor Re move tree? Y N Replace? Y N Move target? Y N C•.t>c: Effect on adjacent treew- C none 0evaivate Notification: []owner ❑manager ❑ govem;ng agency Dave: S1 ONATURE OF PROFESSIONAL axeetraa�v+�s �s._ma asy la 3a � ergo dated Nov 02 09 02:22p Leslie Yarbrough 206,362-3011 p.7 %EE ASSESSMENT FAM Aft sections of this form must be Milk t *mp!etted by agualfied>Qrofessfanal. (A hazard tree must have a target vrithin 1.5x the height of the tree.) site/Address: M'4 3 O Ol N r i p i C U 1 e. w [)r Map/Location: -W 5 Owner public private unknoum (other A Date: t Name of Tree Assesscr:e-n n I `'eel/ � V Q l �� ISA# PN 6 2-<59 A Other Professional Geitificates and Qualif=tions: Dee Ir : 5 Species: Ttn Val a V4 l M tT-1 f DL3H: � ` N of trunks: Height: �_ Sprear* Font✓. ❑generally symmetric or asymmetry ❑stump sprout ❑stag -headed Clown Class: 29dominant ❑ co-dontinant D intarmedrele ❑ suppressed Live crown ratio: �O 1S Ageclass: ❑young ❑semi -mature >X�p ure Hover-mature/senescen` Pr uiing Nstory. ❑down cleaned ❑ exceseweiy thinned ❑ lopped ),19.wn raised O pol arded ❑crown reduced ❑flush cuts ❑cabledtbracee$ O none ❑ multiple pranksc evems Approx. dates: Special Value- OsMcimen Oheritage/hstotic Ovr+7dliie Clunusualt]shLettree Oscreen Oshad-ea digenotls ❑pmtectedbygov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover.k�normai ❑chronicOnedotic Epb.,.kr.? Y Q Growth cosbuctions u }. Folie"Density. INZorma)Osparse I—dske:li�os••nall 0--takes ❑wiretttes ❑signs ❑eab&es Annual shoal growth.0excetentJ!Overage❑poor twigDiaback? Y N OcurWpevemmt Ciguards 'Noundwood developmanL-❑excelIerrt<aeraga Op -or cinane ❑ot»er lrrgorclass: ❑exceflent Waverage ❑fa'r Onow Major pests/diseases: SITE COMMONS siwoharaoler >Kesdence❑com..;woindmift spark ❑openspaceOnaauai Or.•ocd3endliorL-- Landscapetyppe: ❑ p2rkway ❑ raised bed O corftainer G motnd ❑ L--sn ❑shrub border ❑ wind break Irrigation: 4.ne ❑ adequate ❑ Inadecluate ❑ exeeasve 0 trurr;e -nettled Recent site disturbance? Y O B construClon ❑ $oil disturbance 0 grade change ❑ line clearing ❑ she clearing .4 dripline paved: 0% 10-25% 25-5055 5D-7556 75-113M Pavement relied? Y N 9: cinpline WOW sail' 0% 10-2 25-509A 50-75% 75-1cal; % driplins grade lowered: 0% 10-25% . 25-50% 50-75% 75-10095 Sol) problems ❑ drainage ❑sheRow ❑compacted ❑droughty ❑satin • 1381k;9rie ❑ acidic ❑ small vo,ume ❑disease center ❑history• of tell Q clay ❑ expensive ❑slope o ❑ aspey-y- Obstructions: ❑fights IIsignage ❑ lin -of-site i] view ❑overhead lines ❑underground utilities ❑ traf r ❑adjacent veg. i_l Exposure to wind: ❑ sitfigle tree *meta- canopy ❑ above canopy ❑ mcently exposed ❑ windward, canopy edge ❑ area prone m windthrcm Prevailing wind dheclbrt; f3N--� Ccru rence of smwAce stemma ❑ never seldom 0 regularly Use UnderTree: 4<ikft ❑parking ❑ttaffic L7pedes ✓fart ❑necreaati- ❑landsc2M ❑hardscepe Osma!tfealurm ,❑jW.yhniZ Can target be m&md? Y Q Can use t)s restrietw? Y uceupancy: U occaslonat use ❑In ermhtent :rse ❑frequent use -sstznt:rSe Nov 02 09 02:22p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.8 • TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS Suspect motrot Y ON Muslvoarrrrcoynktracket present Y VD. ^I E=Mww. roolw.. ❑ severe ❑ moderate m w Undermined: O savere O rrodeate �ww Root pruned: Root area % Buttress wounded Y Q When: Restricted mot Brew ❑severe O maderzte lax tsolevrtisi for root fa?ure . ❑ rrtodemte Vow LEAN: deg. from vertical pnahn-A ounnahua: et Ccnm'ted Soil heaving: Y Deogy in plane of tame Y Roots broken: Y Sag cradling: Y N Compounting factors: Lean severity: ❑ severe O moderate w -,..«r...r.. - --..,.-..s:,.wv.a.erw-(.-.....r.dseI---m=rn&-h-rate_L-(ow) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Paor tope Bow,swesp Codominantsllorks Multiple attachments Included Sark Excessive end weight CraCks4#iis Hangers Girdlinc Woundsrseatn Decay Cavity ConWrnushnronts/bMCket Bleedingfeap flow, LoeselMcked Bark Nesting holdlbee hive Deadwood/stubs Borersttemutes/arrts Cenkersrgal.Waurls P"evious failure RATING Tree part mosVikey to talc r -row i \ Inspectionpermrt annrarai biannual FaNureI anti J + SzTar e of Part +get =H. t 0d Rating FaiPae pWentiatVow; 2-medium: 3-"; 4-severe Size of part• 1- <6" 2 - 6-18- 115-45 cmg 3-18-30' f45-75 cmj; 4 - >30" (75 CM) Twgtn rating: 1 - occasional use: 2 - interrritlen, use: 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use ABATEMIENT Prune: ❑removedelectivepan OreduceerrdweigW ❑crownciaan ElViin ersisecampy GCrownreduce Ormtlucture Oshape Cable/Braca: inspect further: ❑met crown ❑decay ❑aerial ❑monitor other Remove tree? Y N Reptace? Y N Move target? Y N Effect on adtaeerf trees: Onone Clevaixde Notification: ❑m-finer manager p goveming agency pats SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL Nov 02 09 02:22p Leslie Yarbrough 206-362-3011 p.9 FIKUPPuawe . aw Washington TExperts tv 9792 Edmonds Way Suite #123 Edmonds 10/A. 98020 Office:206-362-3380 * 425-771-4430 * 1-800-839-8900 Fax: 206-362-3011 Fed. 4 t` 91-2007614 - UBT # 601-960-331 N $2,000,000 Liability Coverage — Contractor # washite926mn- _.... Subm;i-Lect To: Estimate Date Time of Estimabe Reference ff �-�—__- Lilin Wu 18430 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone is Added Info 920-698-2229 * LL 1 06-8362 BID We hereby propose to furnish material and labor to complete the work outlined here in for the sum of: plus sales tax iilinwu@gmail.com I We adept all major credit cards We guarantee all material used in this contract to be as specified above and the entire job to be done in a neat, workmanlike manner. Any var9tinhc frnm thig —not or alterations requiring extra labor or material will be performed only upon written order and tilled In addition tr the sum covered by this contract Agreements made with our foremen are recognized. Necessary Permits are property ..ne § -- responsibility. TERMS: PAYMENT DUE UPON JOB COMPLEnON. IF BALANCE IS NOTaPAID WITHIN 15 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE THERE VZLL BE A 5% LATE FEE APPLIED AT 30 DAYS & EVERY 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. NOtE: A 24 HOUR CANCELATION NOTICE IS REQUIRED OR 25% OF THE APPROVED 303 WILL BE BILLED AND DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AGREED UPON SCHEDULED JOB DATE. ACCEPTANCE OF BID The above specifications, terms and contract are satisfactory, and (I)(we) hereby authorize the performance of thi Estimator CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE UPON ACCEPTANCE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS CONT2ACT IS VOID 30 DAYS FROM DATE UNLESS A COPY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED TO BIDDER 9