Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PLN20120031
REFUND REQUEST Received of: VivianOlson Mailing Address: 403 91h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Vendor #: 074148 Amount of refund: $570.00 Permit/App Number: PLN20120031 Receipt Number: REC055608 Reason for Refund: The applicant Vivian Olson paid $585 for a Tree Cutting Permit for her neighbor's property (Jody Daniel) on July 18, 2012, Receipt #055608 (attached). The site of the property is 528 8th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. The owner of the site/tree Jody Daniel has withdrawn the application. Please refund in the amount of $570.00. ADDHcant Paid Surcharge Total Refund $570.00 $15 Requested by: Diane Cunningham Approved by: Date: August 22, 2012 Date: � 2 �F c 1),CITY OF EDMONDS y� r� 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 PERMIT FEES/ RECEIPT DATE: Thursday, August 23, 2012 PERMIT #: PLN20120031 PROJECT ADDRESS: 528 8TH AVE N, EDMONDS PROP OWNER: 528 8TH AVE N EDMONDS, WA 98020-3063 (425)745-0502 *FEE SUMMARY: _. Date ..:- '. Descriphon Fee Amount - - Paid ,' ;Balance'Due .7/18/2012 P-Conditional Use Fee $570.00 $0.00 $570.00 .7/18/2012 X-Permit Surcharge Fee $15.00 $0.00 $15.00 Total Due: $585.00 $0.00 $585.00 *FEES ARE ESTIMATED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED AT SUBMITTAL -SUBJECT TO CHANGE PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS: Date �` ry Receipt # Method%Payee Paid 7/18/2012 REC055608 Auto Nivian Olson ($585.00) X-Permit Surcharge Fee ($15.00) P-Conditional Use Fee ($570.00) 8/23/2012 REC055846 Refund / $585.00 X-Permit Surcharge Fee $15.00 P-Conditional Use Fee $570.00 ri Lien, Kernen From: jodydaniel@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:09 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: , Trees @ 528 8th Ave N, Edmonds WA 98020 Kernen, am withdrawing my request to have tress removed on my property. Jody Daniel I 1 • Lien, Kernen From: Vivian Olson [vivian.olson@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:29 AM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Trees @ 528 8th Ave N, Edmonds WA 98020 Kernen, I spoke to Jody yesterday. It looks like it may still be possible to proceed. I reminded her that part of the permitting requirement is to replant 2 for 1 and I assured her that we would hold off on the cutting until we had the plants and manpower ready to go so that she would not be without the "screen" that she is concerned about losing. Jody also wanted to make sure Mr Thuesen did not clear any of her trees with the job he did this week, but I am confident he wouldn't have done that when we had permission from her and had this legitimate process underway already and that the only trees we included on this permit were deemed hazardous and thus unlikely to notbe authorized. She told me she would email you that night (last night -hopefully you have already received it) to ask you to pause the application until next week when she can look at these issues (rather than terminating the process/withdrawing the permit as per your last conversation with/email from her). On a separate but related subject, Jody said you had told her that the trees marked were not the trees on the permit. That is wholly possible and our mistake -earlier in this process we made inquiries to the arborists about many trees on the property and had marked them to bring the arborists' attention to those trees. We did not make a point of revisiting to untag thereafter. This permit included ONLY the trees that.the arborists found to be hazardous (which was certainly not every tree we asked about) so with Jody's permission, -we will re- enter the property early next week to remove the inapplicable markings and make sure that the trees on, the permit (and ONLY the trees on the permit) are tagged. Thank you for your patience with us. Sincerely, Vivian Olson www.marykay.com/vivo CITTOF EDMONDS - PLANNING DIVISMN. COMMENT FORM PW-Engineering []'Fire ❑ PW Maintenance ❑ Parks & Rec.� _0 Building ❑ Economic Dev. 0 Parks Maintenance Project Number: PLN20120031 Applicant's Name: JODY DANIEL Property Location: 528 8T" AVE. N. Date of Application: 7/18/12 Date Form Routed: 7/19/12 Zoning: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL OF 7 TREES .,**PER ECDC 20.02.005ALL COMMENTS MUST .BE SUBMITTED WITHIN.15 DAYS OF THE DATE THIS FORM WAS ROUTED: • DUE BY 8/03/2012" If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: KERNEN LIEN Ext. 1223 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title: �QQ 11— / 1/� 91J 1'_ ft Ilk- 111 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable). and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ¢I I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): 4V M The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): 01rL M12- Signature: Phone/E-mail: _ az5 - 1 71 d ?, Zd Y/ J 3 9 WEIN MEMORANDUNi Date: August 12, 2012 To: Kernen Lien, Planner From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN2020031— Tree Removal Jody Daniel — 528-8`h Ave N The comments provided below are based upon review of the application and documents submitted for the tree removal proposed at 528-8th Ave N. Additional information is requested from the applicant at this time. Please ask the applicant to respond to the following. Please provide an erosion control plan. How will trees and debris will be removed from the site? Will stumps be removed as well? How will disturbed slope be re- stabilized/permanently vegetated at. end of project? Thank you. City of Edmonds Q. CIT OF. EDMONDS - PLANNING DIVI N COMMENT FORM. .0 PW-Engineering ❑ Fire j PW Maintenance ❑ Parks & .Red.. ❑ Building ❑ Economic Dev: ❑ Parks Maintenance,. Project Number: PLN20120031 Applicant's Name: JODY DANIEL Property Location: 528 8TH AVE. N. Date of Application: 7/18/12 Date Form Routed: 7/19/12 Zoning: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL OF 7 TREES **PER ECDC 20.02.005 ALL .COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 15 DAYS 0F;THE DATE THIS FORM WAS ROUTED: DUE BY 8/03/2012` If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: KERNEN LIEN Ext. 1223 Name of Individual Submitting Com Title: 111 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable). and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): ZZ The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date Signc Phone/E-ma Project Number: PLN20120031 Applicant's Name: JODY DANIEL Property Location: 528 8TH AVE. N. Date of Application: 7/18/12 Date Form Routed: 7/19/12 Zoning: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL OF 7 TREES **PER ECDC 20 02.005ALL:COMMENTS MUST 9E SUBMITTED.WITHIN _15 DAYS OF,THE DATE THIS FORM.WAS,ROUTED:DUEBY 8/03/2012'` - If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: KERNEN LIEN Ext. 1223 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title:��++ _ 5 - �t t2tT i cl di 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable). and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with -the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date: /12 Signature: Phone/E-mail: 42,C 77 ( OZzo X, 13 9-b CITY OF EDMONDS = PLANNING DIVISION COMMENT FORM.. ❑ PW-Engineering Fire ❑ PW Maintenance ❑Parks & Rec. 11 Building ❑ Economic Dev ❑ Parks Maintenance' Project Number: PLN20120031 Applicant's Name: JODY DANIEL Property Location: 528 8TH AVE. N. Date of Application: 7/18/12 Date Form Routed: 7/19/12 Zoning: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL OF 7 TREES **PER ECDC 20;02.005 ALL COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN.15 DAYS:OF THE DATE THIS FORM WAS ROUTED:, DUE BY 8/03/2012 If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: KERNEN LIEN Ext. 1223 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: _-re,+,-J �-L[ Title: �r 9-6 e—� 4-br --- ®1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable). and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to -ensure c requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is Date: I % / 2 3 / l Pi Signature: Phone/E-ma ' $NOHOMI8H CO. :••FIRE . DISTR T �. John J., Westfan Fire Marshal jwL-stfaU@4rec4stlicti.org. 12425. Meridian Ave. - Everett. WA 98208 phone: 425'551-1200 fax: 425-551-1'249 - www.firedietrictl.org w -rR cL,L Q` t pV41. pLAA 1 15 447 5f,'E '�-tTz-TIA 00756500000500 006 AL010 PL 27f 52 00756500000600 810 ALOIIA PL _7�Q�tL ?V4+4twlz&JT" �C}f��vc.� '!' (;Z'•t w )Tj MATlUii SQi4ri,5) 2.0324002252fA 27032900nSr00 �1 5h1871lAVLX ��w`1 WnciIHAVE N (" 7 C2 Ctt('Ll n a. O w", � as w ol, a L. 1 007515500001000 f,i!, 9,114 AVE ri ® co W ® N Wcl W LU C- C� 0 J cc SY9 91HAVE K 270321I00220000 533 9Yli A'JI: 9 270324 rV?_0700 I* Project Number: PLN20120031 Applicant's Name: JODY DANIEL Property Location: 528 8T" AVE. N. Date of Application: 7/18/12 Date Form Routed: 7/19/12 Zoning: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-12) Project Description: TREE REMOVAL OF 7 TREES **RER`ECDC 20,'02 005 ALL COMMENTS MUST.BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 15.DAYS'OF THE DATE THIS FORM WAS ROUTED: DUE BY 8/03/2012`' If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: KERNEN LIEN Ext, 1223 Name of Individual Submitting Com ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable). and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT, so I have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date: Signature: Phone/E-mail: City of Edmonds Land Use Application RECEIVED JUL 1 -2 2012 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 17OR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT g CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # " 909-M31 ZONE f-S" ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE 7—i REC'D BY ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION f,cl ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE D5 RECEIPT # ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE STAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB! ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION 9 OTHER: OJX-t CVJ Co ��. Th Ave N� I1i1� 9 go aO PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION S ok PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) !/eC-T I V e -Tre e< y 5 - oso -D- N � PROPERTY OWNER l e PHONE # (aO (0 3 10 - 3 0 6 9 c ADDRESS �-AqQ, a v\s wA V o g o E-MAIL 104W d" 121 C, C('jmcasi • Hier FAX # Num ber- V a7 TAX ACCOUNT # Q-7 03 a4 OO a DOCA 007 SEC. TWP. RNG. 0? DESCRIPTION OF P OJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH CPpV�? L TTER AS NECESSARY) Re mova l �f�(zj� yn I ae{ ects DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETT R AS NECESSARY) Ed lmo nJ s Crt ;wt was Mar, +kese iY-eisa.re I ocaW w'&; n a. }-ica I u re -b cob-L1 c{�I��c�� � a c�.. m renu i r'�e m ent� � st a 0, a, 1 r��e . -Re IaCe'0-,� + a:r n,a ct�v d,:,a�c u ed iri` '-i pac e-�- APPLICANT Z PHONE #�'(Z 745- 0S0'a A2120Q -31 to 3 0 � Q�jQ ADDRESS T — s WA -I 4 SCE to E-MAIL irar v�tQ.n i e l C:ATMCa4 . ►i FAX # 4a 6 73 - 7S3-3 14 CONTACT PERSON/AGENT VivIalv-\ I PHONE #&a 5) 876 ADDRESS 503 qS A�tc Iy. . LA. iYIOyA s W q 9 So -2- o E-MAIL V i \/ 00 yylo r q kAA4 • 'CC.nin FAx # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLI AGENT ! / 4TE Property Owner's Authorization I, � 'd , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington thaf the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection aKpostmg attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE % I a Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. ies Revised on 9114110 B - Land Use Application. doc Page I of I RECEIVED JUL 1 n 2012 ` DEVEWPMENT SERVICE � EDMONDS COUNTER LANDSCAPING DSCAPING DESIGN INSTALLATION. MAINTENANCE 0 22319 761h Avenue W. Edmonds, WA 98026 T: (425) 775-0427 F: (425) 774-9459 www.EdmondsLandscaping.com July 6, 2012 RE: Hazard Trees located at: 528 8`h Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 There are seven trees I would recommend for removal at this time, located within a critical area; steep slope erosion category as found on the City of Edmonds Critical Areas Map. These seven trees all have significant hazards and pose a risk to public safety and damage to private property as they are located in the direct vicinity of homes, driveways and parking areas, gardening areas, paths and recreational areas located on the subject property and neighboring properties. Due to major defects which pose likelihood of failure in the future, brought on by topping, excessive pruning, significant sap weeping, co -dominant stems with included bark and weak branch attachment, I highly recommend these seven trees for removal. Please see attached removal plan and ISA Tree Hazard Evaluation Forms regarding specifics for each tree. Further, it would be best to remove all cut material from the site in order to maintain slope stability and to eliminate the potential for increased pest activity, particularly rodents, who would use the fallen debris for nesting. I recommend replacement of removed trees, following the city requirements, using native species at a 2:1 ratio. The planting schedule is also shown on the attached removal plan and includes species known for their soil binding qualities and slope stabilization characteristics. The following species are recommended to be planted throughout the site as replacement for removed trees: 4 Acer circinatum Vine Maple 1" caliper 6 Amelanchier alnifolia Western Serviceberry 1" caliper 4 Crataegus suksdorfii Douglas Hawthorne 1" caliper For further information regarding this tree removal and replanting plan, I can be contacted at the above address- or by email at fspillane�edmondslandscaping com Francis Spillane ISA Certified Arborist #PN-7319A Washington :Landscape Architect #1117 Aotographic Guide to the Evaluation of Oard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARDEV/1L UATION FOIIIYi 2nd Edition Map-Ucation: �'?e 4( ptnter: publi _ private ® unknown �.. other r, rte: l �v htspc, l©r: c 73 Date of last inspection: TREE CHARACTERISTICS _ Tree_ __ Species: �- t U DBH: # of lrnnks: Form: Cl generail; s;mrnetric ± lminoras rnmetry Anlajorasymmetr•, I_islump sprow :_tstag-headed HAZARD RATING: —3—+ 2 Failure + Sb.e + Target - Ha -mid Potential of pars Rating Rating 14 /p Irnmediale action headed Needs luriher inspection Dead tree Grown class: 0 dumimml I'D r:."Iominant Ainlerniediale __-suppressed Live crown ratio: � °gib Age class: 146unp LI semi -mature C mature 3 over-mature/senescent Pruning history: -_...lcro.n cleaned U excessivet thinned Xtopped 1 crown raised J pollarded _I crovyn reduced I-' flush cuts ❑ cabled/braced _;none ] rnultiple pruning events Approx. bates; Special Value: n- specimen 5 heritanelhistoric 0 :rildlifa 0 unusual i._f street tree i _t si,reen ! _: shady 171 indigenous ❑ protected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color: Wriorad Q chlorotic CI necrottr; Epicormics? Y Pt Growth obstructions: Foliage density: L normal (sparse Leai size: Yj norrnal L small La stakes _J v,irctties U signs cables Annual shoot growth: U excellent Xaverage J poor Twig Dieback? Y N O curb/pavemew J guards Woandwood development: _' excellent 0average LJ poor . V none U other Vigor class: - excellent U average 9 tair c poor Major pests/diseases: k SITE CONDITIONS Site Character: Aresidence I -I commercial i_ industrial '_I park iJ open suer. L natural L woodland'derest Landscape type: 0 par way C raised bed :=I container mound lawn, U shrub border tU grind break Irrigation: };gone '_i adequate CI inadequate 1-7 excessive 1. trunk wet<Jed Recent site disturbance? Y) h! construction i soil disturbance grade change ES line clearing Li site cip3iring %dripline paved: 0 10-25%R 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y h, % dripline tiw, fill soil: 0".<= 10-25z' 25-5a 50-75'. 75-100g. * dripline grade lowered: Dw 10-25'C 25-50% 50-?S% 75-100`a Soil problems: Z7drainage Mshallow; ❑contparted ndroughly D'mline Etalkaline ; ,widic Csrnall:,oltnne Edis.easerenier I.lhistoryGlfail J day I expansive -1 slope "L0_' aslxpct: Obstructions; U lights 0-1 sirUnage i-i liue-ol-sight 1-view —1 overhead lines O underground ulill ies 71tralfic Xadlacent veg. 7 Exposure to wind: r lI sintlle free Xhelow canop f ❑ abo a canopy F recenlh; expose(} C.: I iainil.�rar(i, Gf+u(rtr; edge !-1 nres: gnque to r;indthro:! Prevailing wind direction: DcGr'rreuee ut ;nc,:wlic e st rrrr, never Vseldorn 0 regularly TARGET osc Under Tree: I "! building (. pa;kinl= �I (collieX1,1111flPsIfian Xrennation X landscape E' hardscape : Amall tealures '-'I utility lines Can large) he moved? Y n Can use he restricted? Y r(D Occupancy: l I occasional use Xiuterrnittent use r—: tiaquent use r consmnl use: Tr: in9ernational Society of Aiboricullure assumes no responsibil0j for conclusions or rerornmendaiions derived horn use of this form- TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot: Y (P Mushroomlconk/braeket preseni: Y N to: Exposed roots: ,A�iqq? severe C1 inridwite >41ow Undermined: U severe 0 macerate >-6 Root pruned: _W% distance trorF; trunk Root area affected: Buttress wounded: Y N When: Restricled root area: =1 severe f_' moderate 4w Potential for root failure: U severe C rnodeiate SGlov! LEAN: _..,- 0 deg. from varticai G natural C unnatural -i self•correcled Sail heaving: Y hf Decay in plane of lean: Y Roots broken Y iN Soil cracking: 'r IJ Compounding factors: _ Lean severity: I severe I.J moderate L: loYr CROWN DEFECTS:, indicate I-imsence of individual defeels and rate their severih (s = severe. m = moderate. I = lu.v) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor to er } Codorninaals,'Icrks fv tifti le attachment Inrguded Sark Excessive end waight Crachlsphls j Hnir wars �� � Girtainti_ + - Wounds.seam € _ 0t:ca° T Gavity _ Conksimush roonisibm cket Rleerlint� sa'� floral LtwsP!c.iar:kerf her; Nesting hole;bee hits Onadwoodrsuibs j i3oi;�rsltermites�anis � -yz L.Cankersr'galIslburls _ Pre:iolis failure HAZARD RATING Tree part most Nkeh" to fail: T _ c.�TS Failuie paieniial: t - tGev:2 - medium: 3 - high; - se%-em Inspection period: annual Biannual o111e1 Size of Marl: t - < ` ti5 cr,11; :2 - e-15" t 15-45 cm is 3 - i8-3rY• t 45-75 cm i; 4 - :>30" ;75 crnt Failure P� �tenha► 1 Size cal Part + l irgei nati8 n- Hazaid Ratinti Target rating: I - oconsional use:2 inlernlittent user 3 - fiequent use: 4 - rrm::tant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: I rr:rnove defective part f_ reduce end vaetyht U crov.n clsan Dthin C raise vanopy 71 cmwn rF.0ucR L_ ieSirl:Citlre [- I shape Cablol8rece: 4,T _ _ Inspectfurther: t= root crown L' L deca i ? aerial 3 monitor Remove tree: N Replace?N Move target: Y N Other- Effect on adjacent Item 'none F evaluate Notification: Awmer _ manager ',%,governing agency Date: COMMENTS Ootographic Guide to the Evaluation ot&ard Trees in Urban Areas :.: ALUATION FORM end Edition TREE HAZAR® EV MaplLocatian:-- Qvinei: publI• _ private _iv unknovin other Date: Inspector: �7 6J �• # 2311 Date of Iasi inspection: PQ i{ HAZARD RATING: faihm! Si;:e + Target m Hazard Potential of part Rating Rating _ Immediate action needed Weds further inspection Dead Iree TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree #::4� Species: 7eI.IC�O�.Q`eNA - s5V� 08H: %T # of trunks: „- i Height: ✓� _ Spread: Fort: ❑ generally Syonneirie }minor asymmetry 1_ •• major as inmetr; C stump sprout .7 Stag-helded Crown class: El duniinaul =tco-dominant Xinwalrediate ' .1 suppressed Live crown ratio: Age class: kyoung ! _l semi -mature n mature w 1 aver-maturefsenescant Pruning history: Jcrotincleaned Clexcessfvelythinned }'opped iJ1=l crown pollarded 1Dcrormreducod Cflush cuts Ucablcd%braced nuue � nwlliple pruning events Approx. dates: Special Value: I-1specimen !-1 Ireritage.'historic D Aldlife C unusual 7 street tree :. -r screen shade ❑ indigenous _^1 protected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color: Anormal ❑ chloiotic C necrotic Epicormics? Y` N Growth obstructions: Foliage density: LJ normal Vspars; Leaf size: normal L small U stains _ Yarelties ❑ signs L � cables Annual shoot growth: G excellent kierage 'LD poor Twig Dieback? Y V U curb%pavement D guards Woundwood development: =lexcellent 103verage E:, poor h: none L other Vigor class: C1 excellent L average AvIlklir U poor Major pestsidiseases: SITE CONDITIONS Site Character. residence I J commercial L L industrial - par% � open space L natural L' woodlanddorest Landscape type: parkviay Ll raised bed 0 container J mound - iaytn L shrub border G wind break Irrigation: /V none L' ad:quate ID inadequate I` excessive I I trunk vetoed Recent site disturbance? Y ® FI construction i i soil disturbance -- grrde orange I._I line clearing site clearing 115 dripline paved: Du 10-25= 25-50% 50q5% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y ht *dripline w/fill soil: 10-2Y4 25-5O% 50-751,1 75-11)0% * dripline grade lowered: 10-25s,: 25.50% 5f1.759:, 75-100% Soil problems: drainage MAshallmv I -) compacted ndruuohly 771sntina --'alkaline ,acidic Csmall aotunie F-- disea3ecenter 0 histori of lail clay I expansive xp srope aspect: Obstructions: : S liohls i. l siuruige 1 line of siilin n :tiew overhead lines t. underground utilities J traffic 'Katliacent veg, i Exposure to wind: f-1 sint'lle tree Nbetow canopy 11 above canopy I -I rereritl, exposers -I l:iririw trd, canopy edgz 1-1 are : prone to ,.vtndth;ow Prevailing wind direction: ��� Oct, urrr:nca of nu%vlice slarmy ; y nevr;r O seldoni O regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: I-lhuilding i parkin[; _Itraffir. Xperlesuian �recrcaiion YIlandscape `_,handscape _--smallfeaiures-iriwityliims Can target be moved? Y Can use be restricted? Y (A Occupancy: I. =1 occasional use - intermittent use X frequent use % constant use The International Society of Arboriculhure assumes no responsibilry for conclusions or recommendations derNarf from use of this form. TREE DEFECTS MT DEFECTS: Suspect root rat: Y N Mushroomlconk/bracket present: Y i. 10: Exposed roots: —I severe l i nuxturale �W Undermined: L. severe moderate Vtow Root pruned: _..*-- distance from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounded: Y N When:. Restricted mot area: r:1 stwuw I . moderate Aft Potential for root failure: al severe (— moderate VVI LEAN: _ deg. from vertical C natural [` unnatural73self-corrected Soil heaving: Y Decay in plane of lean: Y 3) Roots broken Y N Soil cracking: Y N Compounding factors: Lean severity: t se Tre 1_I moderate low CROWN DEFECTS: Indmate presence of individual defects and rate their severity (s = severe. m = moderate. I = lo: ) DEFECT 1 ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor Lager� Bo"';. Codominanlsrtorks- Multiole ntmchments25.=.` huluded ilatk - CracltsJs lits i rairGtiny _ _ "'4aundSScafrt .-- Decay Cavity Conli,fmushroemsrbracket— Bler+rlin ?sa t Il iv Loospilcracked Dark Nestin nolJb?e hive Deadyroodlstubs Sorsrs+iermites,"ants Cankers •alls<buris Prtrjous failure HAZARD RATING Tree partmost Iikety to tail: . _ e JT Faome potential t - low, 2 - merxium; 3 e:� high: � - scre 'nspection period.._-._-- . — arnuaf biannual other Size of p r1' t 'A" 115 cut): 2 615" +,;5-15 cnrf. I•aoure Poential r Si a of Part lariat Rating = Hazard fiating carpel rarinrf] t - Occasional use; 2 imerminent use: _ 3 - frequent use: 4 - conslaw usr•. HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: i remove defective part i— reduce end vxiom U crowa claan O thin C raiso- canopy --D erowa reduce — restructure 1-1 shape Cable/Brace: ur�ther. ; " root crown Lideny -aerial .J monitor ,,. _ _ Inspect f�er Remove tree: ( Y /N Replace? ;J Move target: Y 'N Other: a r t ►V�f r to Effect an adjacent llrees; r I none rkvaluat. Notification: X owncr _ manager tM' o:,erning agen v Date: COMMENTS } Alotographic Guide to the Evaluation of*ard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM 2nd Edition Sita/Address: 523 F" -, ft- 11- f-9ft9K* LOA 98090 HAZARD RATING: -7 � + � + � _ f Failure + Size t Target = Harald Ovvner: public ____ private unknown other Poiential of part Rating Rating Date: Inspector: qa(' 7 2ILI4Aj!� IM i '731 — - Immediate action needed Date of last inspection: i+iq / # = j 7 Needs further inspoction Lead tree TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree g: -I- Species: v�aU r�er>- � � e5 � c ���� Ezg DBH: _r-9— I of trunks: _) Height 7 Spread: Form: of genwalh, symmetric Xminor asymmetry r majorasymmetr; C stump sprout 7, stag -headed Crown class; )- dominant CI c"ominaal J inlerrnedlate suppressed Live crown ratio: °'o Age class: 1. l young semi -mature ❑ mature i l aver mature senescent Pruning history: 0, crot;`n cleaned tJ excessively thinned +J Mopped U crown raised 0 pollarded FL -crown reduced L flush cuts IJ cabledibraced Dnone Xrnultiple pruning events Approx. dates: If F90 JIV Special Value: n spec.imen l7i heritagtl'h toric !J .vildlife C unusual J street tree O screen � shade 0 indigenous `-I proiected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color: goormai 0 chiorotic [:,necrotic Epicormics? Y Foliage density: Xnormal Usparse Leaf size: )(normal Lsmall Annual shoot growth: L excellent �avcrage I poor Twig Oieback? Y lJ Woundwood development: 0 excellent average xpoor U none Vigor class: _f excellent L average Bair IJ 000r Major peslsldiseases: SITE CONDITIONS Growth obstructions: U stakes _ vdre;iics L signs =i cables El curbfpavernent J guards U other _ Site Character: residence I- commercial C industrial =park 0open space L natural L woodlandJoresl Landscape type: t_1 parkway L raised bed J container mound _ lawn hI shrub border L v4nd break Irrigation: Xnono C adequate CJ inadequate L excessive CI trunk wettled Recent site disturbance? Y Pl I I construction F.soil disturbance _ grade change LI line clearing i_l sile clearing %dripline paved: q,- 16-25:Z. 25-50% 50-75?; 75-/00% Pavement littad? Y % dripline w/ fill soil: 40 10-25% 25-50°, 50-75;% 75-100% %dripline grade lowered: 16% 25.50°, 5i)•75:' 75.1i10% Soil problems: i_ f drainage F1 shallmi C7 compacted !I dmngi ly D saline _ alkaline __ acidic G small volufue r~ disease renter ID history of fail '_] clay _ l expansive, Xslope 11110 - aspect: Obstructions: ' I fights t 1 signat)e _ I line,of,sighl O lNew :! overhead tines ❑ underground utilities !1 irctfic Xadiacent vag, -=r Exposure to wind: t"1 single li?n C het my uanoliy X(ahrrre canopy 11 recently r: posed 1 ::indward. cinop� edge 1 area fnorie to ,virodthro.: Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of saul.Wicr: storms I— ner er seldom I] reuularl,y TARGET Use Under Tree: �building .parking L traffic xpedcstrian I_' recrcalian landscape %: harrlsmpe - small remixes '. I utility lines Can target he moved? Y 6 Can use be restricted? Y Occupancy: IJ occasional use L intermittent use Yfrequent use 7,j constant Ilse The International Societv of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility far conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form. TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS. Suspect root rol: 'i rE Mushroom/conk!bracket present: Y id to: Exposed roots: r1 severe C mudmate Xfow Undermined: I__ severe '--moderate Li lov. Root pruned: distance fnorn trunk Root area affected: Buttress wounded: Y PI When: Restricted met area: -I severe Ii moderato l lovr Potential for root failure: -1 severe C moderate A low LEAN. 5� � deg. from vortical C natural C unmilural -1satfq:urra0erl Soil heaving: Y Q Decay in plane of lean: Y ( I� Roots broken Y (ff> Soli cracking: Y 6) Compounding factors: Lean severity: I . svere I i moderate 14foty CROWN DEFECTS: Ind cite presence of individual defects and rate their seventy (s = severe. In = moderah?, I = irm:tt , DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES rnav sleep °! i:vdontinant�forks Multiple attachments inchrded balk Ucessive evd_ iaighl Giidli nt _ Wounds'sean1 Decay Cavity, Conks/mushroomsrbrackei_-- 191cf0in !sate flov., S - Lonsr',!eracked hark Reding bete.++bee hive .�.^..� _ Dead-srooWstuhs 13orarsltemutes/ants Canke95 aIVburl, P:�.#ous taihtre HAZARD RATING Tree part most ikefy to tale: ,. G `` -rsil.rre itrltFrrtial 1 low, ? meulrtm: 3 high; W sM.ere Inspection eriod' — annual biannual other Size of p tr1: t cti' (15 i:rnl, 2 - 8.18- 15-45 cm): Failure Pate . nhat + Size of fart f bryel Rating _ hazard Rating 2 18-3T* (15-75 cm)- 4 - Alr (tS cntt large[ raring: 1 - 0ecn5ional use 2 srfermlftent Ilse: 3 - treilueni use a - i.nnslant irsp, HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: i : remove defective p•3 r L.. redvse end weight U crown clears thin l= raise uirlop`; `1 crown ievuc3 restr;rmure ri simpe Cable/Brace: _ _., Inspect further: Lerootcrown Udecay - aerial monifor Remove tree:0 N Replace? N Move target. Y N Other: V =_�?1.�'(�V� T��4s _ Effect on adjacent ties& 41 none kvahratP POS§Ila+Ui 5�4 LDl1U6f pvk jD jt�(SSA $r7"11 e7x%5"£ Notification: ApAneg -. manager Ago-rerning agency Date: COMMENTS I . photographic Guide to the Evaluation olward Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVAL UATION FORM 2nd Edition Site/Address: /1' �' J� l ��V 5 HAZARD RATING: t'1rap��Location: _y-_! (. _ �' + 3 = g Failure - Size + Tamer Hazard ov;rtei: pu lic - . private u//nknoow,gn� �, y other Potential of part Ratinq Rating Date; f Z Inspector: � 7 ��w/� � �� I� --k— Immediate action neadell Date bf list inspection: L4 1117 feeds further inspection Dead tree TREE CHARACTERISTICS —�" Tree p: f 2. Species: jl nU_, u V_ OBH: a7 fi of trunks: _ _ _ _ _ Height: Spread: _,70 Form: X gP,neralh; symmetric L-1 minor asymmetry G major asymmetr; r stump sprout 7 Stag -headed Crown class: Ni dominant -I co -dominant '--:I intcrnieliatc "_ suppressed Live crown ratio: (M ?�c Age class: I._I young i1 semi-mmuie Xmaturc l.a over-mature..senescent Pruning history: ' i cro:an cleaned U excessively thinned :_l topped _t crown raised UI pollarded � � crown reduced t_' flust, cuts 0 cabledlbraced none 0 mulliple pruning events Approx. dates: Special Value: (=1 specirnrrn rJ I10TitagC1hlsioric rO viildhfe i—r unusual 71 street tree U screen a shaden indigenous protected by qay. agent~; TREE HEALTH Foliage color. 9.1riormal ❑ chlorotic G necrotic Epieormies? Yv Growth obstructions: Foliage density: 4 n ormal U sparse Leal size: K ormal ❑ small t- stakes Q v:ireAies ❑ signs L cables Annual shoot growth: L excellenl )Q average --'poor Twig Dieback? `e id U curb!pmTment J guards Woundwood development: L excellent — average 0 poor Xnone U other Vigor class: excellent average L fair 0 poor Maiorpestsidiseases: dog SITE CONDITIONS Site Character: ', r residena.. 0-commercial Li industrkl I_. park _topen space U natural L v,00dlanflorest Landscape type: _! parknvay L raised bet: D connincr - mound ! lawn CI shrub border L mind break Irrigation: :-4 none _ adequate L l inadequate C�1 excessive L ; trunk v,ettled Recent site disturbance? Y N I, Iconstruction I,, soildisturhance 7 7gradechange I Itineclearinq I-isiteclearing % dripline paved: 0" , ,0-25`-b 25-5M-n 50.754a 75-100%, Pavement lifted? •Y Fl dripline wlfill soil: 10-25". 25.50% 50-75% 75-100% v %dripline grade lowered: 10-25% 25-50% 50=rS':: 775-1001% Soil problems: ZI drainage 0 shalkry n rompapted o aroughty ri safius ." 31alirle —_ acidic G sinafl olurne C disease center 0 history of fail 1 clay I expansive 4 slope �Lo 's aspect. - Obstructions. U lights i_1 signane i ! line -of -sight C1 view overhead lines Ct underOrountt utilities �1 trGific adjr,renf ve4r 3 Exposure to wind: l i single trreee,, 1- belo;v canoliy �aha:M canopy f-1 recenlly exposed 7I a rindu�rd, r anrrfr; edge r -1 area !none to , rfirtth:av! Prevailing wind direction: W occurrence of Snotvlice slonns ne +er Xseklorn C regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: Abuilding parking I traffic Aped soian I:.. recreation Nla,ttisca0e F_'hardscipe %_ small feallues �Jutility lines Can target be moved? Y U) Can use be restricted? Y Pl occupancy: I I occasional use --' intermittent use lrequenl use r =r constant use The International Sociehl of Arboricuiture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or reconimend adons derived from use of this form. TREE DEFECTS r ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rat: Y Q Pliushroom/conkrbracket present: Y N IO: Exposed roots: —1 se, veie ntodernte is tow Undermined: L sn-erc moderate Xew: Root pruned: —fJA— distance from trunk Root area affected: Buttress wounded: 'r N When: Restricted mot area: F-Isevem I : moderate �Clov� Potential for root facture: —1 sevare moderate low LEAN' l---•- deg. Irom vartical C natural h, unnatural i saif-corrected Sail heaving; Y• lJ Decay in plane at lean: Y Roots broken Y 6) Soil cracking: Y �l Compounding factors: lean severity: I severe I -A moderate —7 to-.v I CROWN DEFECTS: ladicaie presence of individual defects and rate their severity, (s = seveiie, rn = motlerate.. I = low) DEFECT_ ? ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper j Bow, s:;ee Codominantsllo;ks Multiple at-mchments InrhiA41 h,ak _ Excessive end weight Cracker's lits Girdling Vlnunds?warn Oer:ay Cavite i Conks%mushrnems, bracket BICGdirt.!3aRo flour M. Loose,%raakrd I)ark Nesting nolelbee hive Peadwood,'stuhs I_ Berer itenniteslants Cankers; r4a)Islhurls Prevoau failurr.: HAZARD RATING Tree part mnst 111<01 to fail:.T��� �_ �� 5 ✓PL►T Failure pc4anlial, 1 - low: 2 - n;edinm: 3 - high: se-vpre Inspection period: __ s_ annual h:annaal other Si::e of Irtrt: 1 1i f to cm): 2 - 6.18" 4.15-!5 cnr is Failure Neiniaf , SiZs of fart r laryt:t Rating = Hazard Bating 3 '18 34'' i45 ? i cm:r 4 >3U (i 5 ,cmf argot rating: 1 occasional Ilse; a intermittent use, 3 - P1.,quent use; 4 - Constant Ilse HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: = remove defective. part -:reduce and v:eight U crown c?ean n thin L raise canop3 `I crown reduca i rastructure CI shape Cable,'Brace: _ Inspect further - root Cro,:n L decay •,... aarlal ml monitor Remove tree: N Replace? 0 Q Move target, Y 'd Other. r Effect on adjacent trees: n- none fxevaluale Sal -54fix (pe'rhi4f, r/ Wj1 p , Notification: /<- ov;ncr - manager xmerning agency Date: COMMENTS ter" )hotographic Guide to the Evaluation o0ard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVALUA TION !-"V17M 2nd Edition Site/Address; L! 'C�/�'yAI� 5 HAZARD RATING: '7 Q blap1ocatfon: S'fZZ -41 -- Owner. publiJy _ private. � ��W ,�unkrriio:vrn�,// s.^�t, other �_�. _p Date: , f� Inspert9o�r: �hK�J3 17 Y2L& &- -731 -1 Date of ursl inSpeelifliv /�'/� �L� $1112 TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree #: —S Species: rr OBH: _l _ f of trunks: Height u _Y pread: Form: r 1 geitE roll;( symmetric i i rhino asymmetry Xmajor asymmetry F4 slump sprout L-- s ao-headed Crown class: .1 dominant L_1 cu-domirranl intermediate )(suppressed Live crown ratio: _ °« Age class: Xyoung :-.:Isemi-mature U mature :.-1 over-maturelsenescent Pruning history: Acro}gin cleaned Xexcessively thinned )<topped J crown raised J pollarded 1_7 crown reduced iLss flush cuts 0 cabledibraced Unone,jmullipleprunirrgeverrts Approx'dates: Special Va!ue: CI specimen 0 liefita-gethisturic Owildlile i:, unusual _-I street tree lJ screen L shade O indigenous U protected luy gov, ageocy TREE HEALTH Foliage color. 9 normal Clchlorotic r-r necrotic Epicormics? Y Growth obstructions: Foliage density: 0 normzI U sparse Leal size: J normal L small U stakes wireities ❑ signs J cables Annual shoot growth: Lexcellent Xivetage --I poor TwigDieback? Y OP Dcurbipavernem ; 1guards Woundwood development: U, excatlent average %Q poor Li none 0 other Vigor class: excellent U average L fair poor Major pests/diseases: SITE CONDITIONS Site Character: Xresidence L commercial L industrial park ,J open space L natural C, woodlancfdorest Landscape type: _t parkway L raised bed U i ornainer mound E, lavm 0 shrub border E µ ,rind break Irrigation: X.none 7 , adequate !::I inadequate L� excessive I` trunk %,ettled Recent site disturbance? V IN IXconstruction J soil dislarhance k7 r-rade change 1_1 line clearing C site clearing * dripline paned: 10Z54'o 25 5Q`.o 5075° 75100Qt, Pavement lifted? Y 11 * dripline vrllill soil: 0% Q 25°' 25.505, 50-75% 75-10(M. * dripline grade lowered: 0° 10-254' 25-50% 50-751Yo 75-190% Soil problems: :D drainage f l r:hallo+r'rornpacted rl drought, l saline -alkaline L acidic C small vr,lurny -_1 disease (,enter L history of fail .]clay le:!pansive jQslope_aspect: Obstructions: A lirlhls ri; ignaue -1 linu•at•sight : ! ov ihead litres I 1 undergroond uldiiies .-t tmi-fic ___1 adjacent 4eg. Lr Exposure to vAnd: ill single tree G below mnopy n above canopy; I-f iecei0; axposed X :• indward. canopy edge D area prone to windthrow Prevailing wind direction: t "twence of snuvr:'ice storms - not-er O seldom O regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: f..l building C_ parking i. rtrattic X peie$ldair d iccrealiun Xianascape 7 hardscape small fealuies -I utility lines Can target be moved? Y 'V Can use be restricted? Y DIT Occupancy: 1 _tocrasionat use D intarmittent!lse Xtrequent use 7 constant use The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derNed from use of this form. TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rat: Yt5 roushmowconoracket present: Y €' 10: Exposed roots; 1 staere F--, Inucipuille ?10low Undermined: I'severe . moderate 1.(}Gw Root pruned: _uN _ distance from trunk Root area affected: y_Y_r_. % Buttress wounded: Y fl When: v._....s ._ ... _� Restricted root area: D sr.vere [—i moderate >�;.ti' PDlenfiaf for root failure: severe C moderate ilr�v LEM: ,..,,,_0— deg. from vertical C natural f- unnalwal =.i self•conacled Soil heaving: Y N Decay in plane of lean: Y (9 hoots broken Y 'r✓ Soil cracidng: Y f+l Compounding factors: Lean severity: I severe I_ I moderate -L low CROWIU AFFECTS: Indiraip presence of individual defects and rate their severit; {s = severe. in = moderate, I = I,►.+) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow, Sweep CodoininantsAorks IVIURI PIe attachments Inr:111( i haute Excessive Nrui t"1?il�lf Cracksis GIs ftanners _ Girdling �.,.. Woundi`s=:am --�( nr:r7t_ Cavity_ Conk:anlushroomsr'bracket Bleedin : sa) flow LoosUt,racked b?.rk Nesting holbtee hive Oeadwoodistuhs__- (? Lr"rrs,%tPrmifes?aims Canke+s.`gallslburi i Pr'evions tailUrr HAZARD RATING lice pw most likely to tail: _, Failuie polonlicl: t - io i; 2 - met iwn; 3 - high: = - severe Inspection period:annual �-iarinl Y other Sb'a 0 hart: 1 to 05 call.' - 5-15"05-45 crn): Failure 'otenlial r. Si a of Red r• laryl:t Raling = Haraal Rating 18 3't (45 5 r,m;r 4:•:i[J (� 5 , m 7 vqw ratintq: i - ocu_ional ilse; 2 intermittent use: frequent use • constant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: I rrms;ve tleterti>>e part reduce erid v eight U crown c'aan ❑ thin C raise otiop "1 cro:vn redr:^a - restructure n shape Cablelarace: _ Inspect further: L root crown U decay aerial <J monitor Remove tree: rl Replace? Dd Move target: Y N Other: oZ r' l rzi [% Effect an adjacent trees: 4 none f; 7 evaluate Notification: A--lowner _ manager *overnmg agency Oates COMMENTS &otographic Guide to the Evaluation o,&ard Trees in Urban Areas f, TREE HAZARD FVAL UATION FORM end Edition SitetAddiess: 'a 0 8 fk26y,�]; PrlaprLocation: _ 64 Ow:nev publ • _ private ,x unknor o other hate: fltspr clar:��3 Darr, of last inspection: 1+ TREE HAZARD RATING: 3: 2+-S Failure Ti 7 + Targrl = Hazard Potential of part Rating Rating Irnmediafa action Headed Needs further inspection Dead tree Tree o _II C� _Species: .. e ud b--so ���i ' __ 5< < _ d7�� �� IF jZ» DOH: _ir 3 r� # of trunks: _ , Height 35 `6pread: _36 / Form: 0 generally s;inmetric 7_1 minor asymmetry Demajor asymmetry L slump sprout = stag -headed Crown class: ❑ doininant �__I co-duminaal Xintermediato suppressed Live crown ralio:. Age class: Elyoung ?Qsemi-mature C(, mature Cl over i tureispriescent Pruning history: cream cleamed *cessivel, thinned Xtopped U crown raised f_i pollarded 4_t c 6vm reduced tL flush cuts L cabled+braced / nUne Ilttlll{ I(' pruving events Approx. dates: Special value: I3 specirnen o heritaft1iisloric t...l ;wildlife 1 : unusual 71 street tree l�l screen 7shade t l indigenous 7_1 protPcted by gov, aneney TREE HEALTH Foliage color: Anormal ❑ chforotic = necrotic Epicormics? Y Va Growth obstructions: Foliage density: Li normal U sparse Leaf size: Normal L small #Ul staxes _ v.irenias U sign, L cables Annual shoot growth: G exoellent >Zlverage T poor Twig Dieback? Y © 0 curb/pavement l guards. Woundwood development: is excellent average "'door U none U other Vigor class: .excellent *erage L fair A&oor Major pestsidiseases: SITE CONDITIONS Site Character: A residence L commerrW L industrial _ park J open space L natural L woodland'Jor st Landscape type: U par'.�tvay L raised bed =l container = mound "_ tat:n U shrub border fs rind break Irrigatlon: Alone C' adequate U inadequate U excessive 1—trunk wettled Recent site disturbance?0 N V? construction oil disturbance Arade chancre I'A tine clearing ; _ rile cleiria(l * dripline paved: ?°' 10-2i;4) 25.50% 50-75% 75.100% Pavement lifted? Y N * dripline vil fill soil: .; 80.7 5% 75-100% 0%, 10-?5• 1. �25;(Ors 4i dripline grade lowered: 0°', 10-25`� 50_750la 75-100% Soil problems: t—t drainages Ct 1'1 dreughly __l ;;.aline . alkaline _.__'acidic 1:_ small volunre C':kease 1 eakipi f�l historw at fail l.I ch y I ZXlkansive i''ks100e aspeci Obstructions: '_nights I Isignage -lline-ol-sigh! 1'I:ieV2 7 overhead lines [I underground utilities 7ltraMe Vadlacentvag. Vl Exposure to wind: 1 J Single lieN'j F bP,fow canape; 11 above nanopy FI rpranil i xposedl , f -Ann warr=', carinf?l edge I { firei; ptpriE 10 t':111dllirUl'! Prevailing wind direction: I. 3 Ucr,urren(e ul sno.v; it a slorins _ ue:'er U sekforn G requiarly TARGET Use Under Tree: Kbuilding 17! parking U iratfic P(lledeshian X recreation }l iandscape L-Aiardscape -' small teafurrs i l uiifity lines Can target be moved? Y Q Can use be restricted? Y N Occupancy: Irl occasional use 71intermittent use A frequent use 1 ccrstant use The international Society of Arboriculture assumes no rsponsibility for conclusions of recommendations derived frorn use of this form. TREE, DEFECTS HODT DEFECTS: Suspectroot rat: Y (9 Mush ro orn/conk/bracket present: Y ra ID: - Exposed roots: 'Flseve.ip Frnodemm Undermined: I_severeL-'-moderate: .>01-v: Root pruned: P44— distance frorn trunk Root area affected- —% Buttress wounded; Y N When: Restricted root area: .-I severe 1. moderate. Vow Potential for root failure: -J severe F moderate r<w LM.L'5-�— deg. from vertical 0 natOol to wmalufal ---imll-corrected Sail heaving: Y N Decay in plane at lean: Y 9) Roots broken Y 61 Soil cracking: Y D Compounding ladors: m Lean severity: 11 r_ severe I-Imodeiate Dow CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their sevehtl (s = severe. ni = moderate, I= low) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor laper ------ 7 -1rqT--,evv MMliple Indoded ijaik Cxrtssive end weiuht cracks(`s lits Hamlets Girdlirt Wbujidslscam ConPVmushnooms,1)rdcket 81ekNIi1q0S12 flow Loov-krgked I)ark Nesting holetee hhT Deadidoodistubs ftrer.,V( imitasiantS Cankealls!burls_ prov'iows ioilure HAZARD RATING Tree par, most like0y to tail. q Faikire poleatial: I - 2 - nx.,jium: 3 high: 4 - -'mrpre Inspection period: annual biannual other Site01 Imfl: I - -C6- 4 1i i1m). 2 - 5.18"(15-45 cfjj)' Failure Potential •i size of Fait i-ixget Rating =hazard Hatim cm c1n) TAr.9ci ;aliiiq. I - occ-isional iix; 2 intemlittent use; 3 - f;equeill use: 4 - i,,onstant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: Cturnavedefective part 1.'rc-duc- end weight Llcrown clan CIthii-i Craise canopy 1mownrEouc-3 ',,.,rELsIrvmijrt3, nihape Cable/Brace: Inspect further: L root croyvn Lldeciy --aerial .71 rnorfit(ir Remove tree: N Replace? (9 N Move target: Y IN Other: Effect an adjacent tress: Ftlnofre 17.7 evaluate A Notification: ", .\.,jrcr — manager Aoverning agency Date: COMMENTS Wotographic Guide to the Evaluation oftard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM 2nd Edition S tel/idcrrss: �� t� �J r f� li v ` 1/� HAZARD RATING: N1aplLocation: Z�J l __ 2 + �` + _ Failure + Sire + T,�rrget _ Harard Owner: publi —I— private _ X — unkfim,,rr T___��_____ other _ Potential of part Rating Rating (tale: � Inspector: lc( Lis l ) l hnrn3thate action needed Pair. of Iasi inspection: 14 t7 — r'teeds further inspection Dead tree TREE CHARACTERISTICS ------rr---- II l��. rp� rr Chip Tree: _� ___ Species: __�_ i .lA i.�aL. a- t1�� OBH: q # of trunks: �.. _ Height 5' Spread: _� D Form: 0 generally symmetric Xminar asymmetry n major asymmetr, E slump sprout ; slag•heatled Crown class: LI donlioani D co -dominant /'q'interntediate C=1 suppressed Live crown ratio: li- ?� Age class: Xyoung Dsemi-matum 17 mature -I civer-mature!senescern Pruning history: r 1cro:,m cleaned U excessively thinned Vopped _I crown raised J pollarded ! crown reduced Ct flush cuts ❑ cabled?braced =hone D rntrllipte pruning events Approx. dates: Special Value: !"1 specimen O l,erital a?historic i-I+Vildlile i i unusual -1 street tree Z-7 screen ❑ shade C7 indigenous -1 protected by gov. agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color: Nnortinal Q chlorodc r necrotic. Epicormics? Y U Growth obstructions: Foliage density: t normal U sparse Leaf size: ` , normcl L small L] stakes _ YAreiiies ❑ signs = cables Annual shoot growth: G excellent Average ' I poor Twig Diebaek? Y p D curb%pavement Li guards Woundwood development: -r excellent average L poor Lr none U other Vigor class: _ excellent IXaverage L fair U poor 0.1 Major pestsidiseases: SITE CONDITIONS Silo Character. residence U commercial LJ indusmal -;j park J open space L natural L woodlan(Norest Landscape type: _i parkv ay U raised bell I container mound - la;°: n L shrub border E vJnd break Irrigation: Anone r_+ad-Nuale 13inadequate Cexcessive CJtrunk wettled Recent site disturbance? O PJ Keonslruction _ � ..oil disturbance Yratfe chantia 1_I line clraring site clearing o dripline paved: M.) -25� 25.50% 50.75?0 75-i00% Pavement lifted? Y tI °ice dripline witill soil: Oar 10-25 25.509;., 50-W,, i51(tia° * dripline grade lowered: v 10-25% 25-50% 5t)-75';S 7.rrl(M.,; Soil problems: 1 r:.rainage .� shalla: t compacted C 1 droughty :1 saline _alkaline ,acidic C small :ulwrr2 disease center [l history of sail I clay I expansive I slope aspect: Obstructions: J lights LI signage D liru;-obsight ❑ %i yr L1 averhead (roes D underground utilities C traffic 1110 adjacent Veg. 0 Exposure to wind: `l single tree Eli bel( cagopy f_i above cannp'; 11 rarenth; exposed )d::4ndw, 1d, canon_; alga -1 aran lunne to ";;inflibm Prevailing wind direction: W Y,' J} {tecurrenr e ni srru4vlr[x storms _ never 4Gseldurn 0regularb; TARGET Use Under Tree: CI huildinrl Marking L' traffic Xix:riesirian �Oecrealiun laridsm:ape _ hardscape - small fcalures '. l utility tines Can target he moved? Y PJ Can use he restricted? Y PJ Occupancy: I'I occasional rise intermittent trse Afrequent use i ronstani nse The International Society of Arboriculture assumes na responsibilry for conclusions or recommendaiians darivert from use of this form. ` TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot: Y 0 Mushroomlconk/bracket present: Y N ID: Exposed roots: -1 severe i ^ rnnderatc - Ow Undermined: I_ severe _7 moderate Root pruned: _ iJ _ distance from trunk Root area affected: 9.-a Buttress wounded: Y N When- Restricted root area: 0 seveno L; moderate JGiow Potential for root failure: , .l sever~ I: moderate �0.01.v LEAN: deg. from vertical C natural f..; unnatural 71 self-rorrecled Sail heaving: Y �l Decay in plane of lean: Y G? Rants broken Y V Soil cracking: Y M-31 Compounding factors: Lean severity. Gmtre 111 moderate L Io:v CRDIVN DEFECTS: Indi ;ate presence of Individual defects and rate their severity; (s = severe. rn = nwderate, I = to,.,;) DEFECT I ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS i BRANCHES Poor taper t _ Riru. St'1Y.? 1 I I Codowinanl0orks Multiple attachments Inritidt4i back _ Ucessive end ';rei hf Cracksis lit5 Hirn ol5 Girdling lseam Wounds Deco u Comes ,roushroemslbrcketw _ { Rleedinglsau Ilo;: _ —M _ _I Loo-se,'cncked bark Nestinn haielbee hive I Deadwood/stubs I f3nrars%termdesanls T�-.- i .. __ ���� Gan`<er:,,�gailsiourts� i Previoite failure HAZARD RATING Tree part most likely to fail Failure poluntial: 1 - low; 2 - Medium; 3 � high: 4 - sevew inspection period:.-..,_ — annual— biannual other Sire of pan: 1 - rii' (1 cm); 2 - E-18" (15-45 rn)j: 3-18-30" (45-75 cm); - - >30" (75 cm) Failure Poterilial l Sizi of fart + Tnrgut Rating = Hazard Hating largei rating, 1 - ncc, sinnal use; 2 intemrittent use: �] � ! �T 2 + v + ' 3 - fragiienl ns2: 4 - ciinslant lisp. HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: ; remove defect%re pair recuce end oxighl U Grown c`aan O thin [ raiss canopy " 1 crown reface. 7 rzsiructure n shape Cahle/Srace: Inspect fudh�et: '_ root ccrrownyL] decay - aarial J inonitor Move Remove treeDy N Replace? ON target: Y �rN Other: Effect on adjacent trees: mrrone, i evalitaO hlotification: t^rne; � manager :eming agency Date: COMMENTS ec i . ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST JUL1 �' 2011 EM& EIO ir Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. Signa#x(re of Applicant of Applicant's Representative Subscribed and sworn to before me this Josay of for the State of Washington ding at Revised on 9130111 P2 - Adjacent Property Owners List. doc Page 2 of 2 ro gib addMss Peter Benvenuti or Current Resident 506 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Peter & Stephanie Wick III or Current Resident 840 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Clinton Jones Resident or Current R e 856 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 James G Hammersberg or Current Resident 841 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Viola S Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ken & Vera Reidy or Current Resident 771 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Virginia Deaver or Current Resident 612 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Robert P Grimm or Current Resident 530 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Gary & Joan Bloom or Current Resident = 600 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Roger L Smis or Current Resident 808 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 10 Theus & Janice Doolittle or Current Resident 818 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Lara Puckett or Current Resident 844 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Dolores Morgan or Current Resident 853 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Charles E Olson or Current Resident .835 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ken & Vera Reidy or Current Resident 7718th Ave S Edmonds WA 98020 Donald Mayfield or Current Resident 604 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Sylvia Ringen or Current Resident 522 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Douglas R & Amanda L Thompson or Current Resident 802 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Mark & Diane Saffitz or Current Resident 810 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 W F Wolf or Current Resident 836 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 William & Kathleen Baird or Current Resident 850 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020. Laurie M Niven or Current Resident 847 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident ' 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ronscott Construction Inc l or Current Resident 761 Daley St Edmonds WA .98020 Robert Grimm j or Current Resident 530 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Brian K Clute or Current Resident 800 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Andrew K Perry I or Current Resident 804 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Clayton & Geraldine Gardner or Current Resident I 814 Aloha PI. Edmonds WA 98020 Vasiliki Barokas or Current Resident 816 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 710 9th Ave Seattle WA 98104 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 710 9th Ave Seattle WA 98104 Glen & Diane Rice or Current Resident 825 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Paul G Webster or Current Resident 707 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Robert W & Cecelia A Campbell or Current Resident 657 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Judith Tourtellot or Current Resident 529 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Charles Lanasa or Current Resident 524 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Mary K Porter or Current Resident 18824 Olympic View Dr Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current.Resident 710 9th Ave . Seattle WA 98104 Dave Toon or Current Resident Po Box 463 Hansville WA 98340 Aseem Prakash or Current Resident 647 9th Ave. N Edmonds WA 98020 John Marts or Current Resident Po Box 145 Edmonds WA 98020 Eric Thuesen Custom Homes LLC or Current Resident 509 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Randy & Deborah Johnson or Current Resident 643 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Mary K Porter or Current Resident 18824 Olympic View Dr Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 710 9th Ave Seattle WA 98104 Lance Morrison or Current Resident 809 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Douglas Williams or Current Resident 829 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Donald A & Jane L Simpson i or Current Resident 6615 79th St W Lakewood WA 98499 Gregory V & Vivian A Olson or Current Resident 503 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 i Scott L & Maria G Mallory or Current Resident 520 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Peter Benvenuti or Current Resident 506 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Peter & Stephanie Wick III or Current Resident 840 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Clinton Jones or Current Resident 856 Daley St Edmonds -WA 98020 James G Hammersberg or Current Resident 841 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Viola S Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ken & Vera Reidy or Current Resident 771 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Virginia Deaver or Current Resident 612 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Robert P Grimm or Current Resident 530 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Gary & Joan Bloom or Current Resident 600 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Roger L Smis or Current Resident 808 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020. Theus & Janice Doolittle or Current Resident 818 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Lara Puckett or Current Resident 844 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Dolores Morgan or Current Resident 853 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Charles E'Olson or Current Resident 835 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ken & Vera Reidy or Current Resident 771 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Donald Mayfield or Current Resident 604 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Sylvia Ringen or Current Resident 522 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Douglas R & Amanda L Thompson or Current Resident 802 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Mark & Diane Saffitz or Current Resident 4755 Somerset Dr SE Bellevue WA 98006 W F Wolf or Current Resident 836 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 William & Kathleen Baird or Current Resident 850 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Laurie M Niven or Current Resident 847 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Forrest W Walls or Current Resident 831 Daley St Edmonds WA 98020 Ronscott Construction'Inc or Current Resident 8817 207th PI SW Edmonds WA 98026 Robert Grimm i or Current Resident i 530 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Brian.K Clute i or Current Resident 800 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 i Andrew K Perry or Current Resident i 804 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Clayton & Geraldine Gardner or Current Resident 814 Aloha PI. Edmonds WA 98020 Vasiliki Barokas or Current Resident 816 Aloha PI Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 760 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 i Holy RosaryChurch-Edmonds or Current Resident 760 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Glen & Diane Rice or Current Resident 825 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Paul G Webster or Current Resident 707 9th Ave N - Edmonds WA 98020 Robert W & Cecelia A Campbell or Current Resident 657 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Judith Tourtellot or Current Resident 529 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Charles Lanasa or Current Resident 524 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 r" Mary K Porter or Current Resident 818 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 760 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Dave Toon or Current Resident 807 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Aseem Prakash or Current Resident 647 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 John Marts or Current Resident 805 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Eric Thuesen Custom Homes LLC or Current Resident 509 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Randy & Deborah Johnson or Current Resident 643 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Mary K Porter or Current Resident 645 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Holy Rosary Church -Edmonds or Current Resident 760 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Lance Morrison or Current Resident 809 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Douglas Williams or Current Resident 829 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Donald A & Jane L Simpson or Current Resident 827 Aloha St Edmonds WA 98020 Gregory V & Vivian A Olson or Current Resident 503 9th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 Scott L & Maria G Mallory or Current Resident 520 8th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020