Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PLN20180069_StaffReport and Attachments
CITY OF EDMONDS I2l 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220. Fax: 425.77I.0221 . Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT . PLANNING DIVISION c. 189s Project: File Number: Date of Report: Staff Contact: Public Hearing PLANNING DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION .ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Edmonds Crossing Apartment P1N20180069 March 26,2019 Michele Q. Szafran, Pl ner Wednesday - April 3,2OL9 at 7:00 P.M. Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250-5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA 98020 t.SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-unit multi-family development and associated parking. The 10 units are proposed in a new three (3) story building with a mix of studios, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units. Parking for the units will be located adjacent to the building along the northwest end of the property. (Attachments L - 10). GENERAL INFORMATION L. Owner: RNK Eastside LLC 2. Applicant: Haynes Lund; Haynes, Wilson, Lund (HWL)Architects LLC 3. Tax Parcel Number: 00463301000302 4. Location: 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds WA 98020 (Attachment 8) 5. Size: The subject property contains L5,682 square feet. 6. Zonins: The subject property is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM - L.5) with a maximum density of one dwelling unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area. 7. Existing Use: There are current structure on the property. ly two single family residences and one duplex Page 2 of 16 8. Proposed Use: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-unit multi-family development and associated parking. The 10 units are proposed in a new three (3) story building with a mix of studios, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units. Parking for the units would be located adjacent to the building along the northwest end of the property. 9. Process: Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010, proposed developments that require a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination (those that are not categorically exempt from SEPA) are reviewed by the ADB in a public hearing. According to ECDC 20.01.003, review by the ADB in a public hearing format is a Type III-B decision, which is appealable to the City Council. III. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Review under SEPA is required for this project because the project exceeds four (4) multifamily residential units. . The applicant submitted a SEPA Checklist for the project which is included in Attachment 6. The City of Edmonds determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and issued SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance on January 22, 2019 (Attachment 7). The City has not received any appeals of the SEPA determination. IV. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS A “Notice of Application and SEPA Threshold Determination” was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on January 22, 2019. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. See Attachment 12 for public notice documentation regarding the Notice of Application and SEPA determination. The “Notice of Public Hearing” was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on March 20, 2019. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. See Attachment 14 for public notice documentation regarding the Notice of Public Hearing. The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.03 (Public Notice). Two written comments have been submitted on the proposal; one from Snohomish County PUD and the second from Peter Alm on behalf of WSDOT-NW Region Development Services. Snohomish County PUD No. 1 noted the district has sufficient electric system capacity to serve the proposed development; however, the existing facilities in the area may requiring upgrading. PUD noted any relocation, alteration or removal of District facilities to accommodate this project shall be at the expense of the developer and must be coordinated with PUD in advance (Attachment 19). Page 3 of 16 Staff Response: Utilities will be included on the civil portion of the building permit and it will be the responsibility of the developer to coordinate with PUD. Peter Alm inquired about any changes to the existing curb, gutter and/or pavement of SR- 104 so that the proposed changes may be reviewed. Staff Response: Staff emailed the proposed plans to be reviewed and no additional comments have been received. (Attachment 20) V. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed by South County Fire, City of Edmonds Public Works, Engineering and Building Divisions of the Development Services Department. The Building Division had no comments at this time. Compliance with all applicable building codes will be reviewed under the building permit application. (Attachment 15). South County Fire provided comments regarding 1) access width and turning radius to conform to South County Fire access standards, 2) Fire land Markings to conform to Fire Lane marking standards, 3) Knox key box to conform to access standards and 4) Fire alarm and Sprinklers (Attachment 11 and 16). Comments 2-4 will be reviewed with the building permit application for compliance with South County Fire. Comment 1 regarding the turning radii must be addressed as it could impact the overall layout of the site. Revised plans from the applicant where received on March 1, 2019 (Attachment 3 and 13) and routed to departments for review and comments. Fire had no additional comments. Compliance will be further reviewed with a building permit application. The Public Works-Recycling Coordinator commented on the proposal and requested that the designated outside waste container staging area be shown on the proposed plans. The revised plans received on March 1, 2019 (Attachment 3 and 13) adequately show the designated staging area for the resident’s waste containers however it has been requested that the curb be eliminated for ease of access of the trash collection. Trash collection access will be reviewed further under the building permit application. (Attachment 11 and 17). The Engineering Division noted that the proposal is consistent with Title 18 ECDC and the City’s Engineering Standards (Attachment 18). Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be further reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. Trees within the right-of-way will be determined at a later date by the Parks Manager and has been made a condition of approval. Page 4 of 16 VI. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is “Edmonds Way Corridor.” The current project is subject to General Design Review as outlined in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. One of the findings required by ECDC 20.11.020 is that the proposal is consistent with the design guidelines provide in the Urban Design Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Below is a detailed analysis on how the proposal complies with the goals and objectives for site design, building form, and building facade contained in the Comprehensive Plan’s Urban Design Chapter. Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Objectives Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. Staff Findings: The subject property is a triangular shaped lot that is accessed from Edmonds Way. A one-way semicircular drive is proposed off of Edmonds Way. In addition to providing access the semicircular drive will also allow service vehicles to access the site without the need to turn around and will allow vehicles to pull safely off of Edmonds Way. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. Staff Findings: The proposal locates the building as close to the front of the site as possible with balconies along the street setback line. Parking is located to the side of the structure. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. Staff Findings: There is no need to integrate access between adjacent developments since this is a private residential development which is adjacent to other private residential developments on all sides except for the commercial property located south of the site. The main access to the building is directly from the sidewalk. There is a pedestrian walkway from the parking area to the building. Bicycle parking is underneath the stairs along the walkway. There are existing bus stops within easy walking distance (less than 800 feet). A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. Page 5 of 16 Staff Findings: The main building entry faces the street and there is a direct path to it. The building is oriented towards the front of the site and is parallel with the street. The proposal includes gathering space in front of the entries of each unit as well as a common patio on the second floor along the street front portion of the building. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. Staff Findings: Project meets the setbacks requirements for the zone and landscaping is provided within and around the perimeter of the development consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. Staff Findings: The RM 1.5 zone does not provide specific open space requirements; however, the proposal includes site landscaping, a rooftop courtyard above the studio unit, and outdoor decks/patios. The rooftop courtyard appears to be able to accommodate seating as well as the decks/patio areas. While the onsite landscaping will enhance the visual attributes of the site, they are not intended to provide places for interaction, play, seating or other activities. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way-finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. Staff Findings: The project uses traditional materials but arranges them in a unique manner responsive to the characteristics of the site. The building height along with the pedestrian paths will help with way-finding. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. Staff Findings: Covered entries are provided. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians – including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces – to support activity and security. Staff Findings: Adequate site lighting will be provided for the parking lot, for all pathways to the building, all walkways within the structure and at all unit entries. (Attachment 3, Sheet E10). Page 6 of 16 A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city’s emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. Staff Findings: No signage proposed at this time. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. Staff Findings: Most utility systems will be located toward the side of the building away from the street, some utilities are shown on the plan near the site entrance but will be screened by landscaping. The trash storage will be hidden from public view within the structure. A trash staging area is to be provided adjacent to the entry drive. (Attachment 3; sheet A20, and sheet L-1.3) A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms – such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees – into site design whenever possible. Staff Findings: No significant features exist on the site. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Staff Findings: Landscaping is provided consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. See the discussion on landscaping in Section 7.D below. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. Staff Findings: The proposed building offers an arrangement of forms, rooflines, windows and other elements that is unique to this building which is not repetitive or monotonous. A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. Page 7 of 16 Staff Findings: The proposed building is broken up into individual unit blocks that minimize the bulk of the building. It presents a number of railing, stairways, doors and individual window units which provide a human scale to the building. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. Staff Findings: The proposed building provides varied roof pitches and projections, which help identify the separate units within the building and provide modulation to the overall roof form. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. Staff Findings: The proposed exterior walls of the building are modulated by continuous bands that break the façade down by floors. Finish materials are varied between building elements, to provide variety in the façade. The proposed site landscaping also helps break up the building façade. (Attachment 4, and 3 sheet A30 and L-1.3) Design Objectives for Building Façade. Building facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building – the portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place – is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Building Façade Design. Encourage building façades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. Staff Findings: The proposed building is oriented along the street setback line parallel to Edmonds Way. The proposal establishes the streetscape while providing a structure with strong individual identity. The overall theme of the development has a unified residential appearance. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a façade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. Staff Findings: The design utilizes windows clustered at the building corners to provide a recurring element to the façade. Locating the windows at the corners of the building allows for light and air to the building interior. Window size and variety are provided. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building façades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in façade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. Page 8 of 16 Staff Findings: As mentioned above, there is good variety in façade materials and design elements on all sides of the building. VII. DEVELOPMENT CODE A. Chapter 16.30 ECDC - Multi-Family Residential Zone: The subject property is located with the Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5) zone and subject to the development standards of Chapter 16.30 ECDC. ECDC 16.30.010 Uses Staff Findings: Multiple dwellings is a permitted primary use pursuant to ECDC 16.30.010.A.1, so the proposed development is consistent with the allowed uses of the RM1.5 zone. ECDC 16.30.030 Development Standards Subdistrict Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (Sq. Ft.) Minimum Street Setback Minimum Side Setback Minimum Rear Setback Maximum Height Maximum Coverage RM-1.5 1,500 15’ 10’ 15’ 25’1 45% 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. Staff Findings – Density: The subject property contains 15,682 square feet of lot area. With a density of one dwelling unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area, a maximum of 10 dwelling units can be constructed. The proposal is for 10 dwelling units within a three (3) story building so the proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the RM-1.5 zone. Staff Findings – Setbacks: Since the subject property is an irregular shape there is no rear setback. The minimum street setback is 15 feet and the minimum side setbacks are 10 feet. The proposed structure is compliant with the setback requirements. The proposal is consistent with the setback requirements of the RM-1.5 zone. Staff Findings – Height: The maximum allowed height for the proposed structure is limited to 25 feet and 30 feet with a slope of 4 inches in 12 inches or greater. The proposed structure appears to have been designed to comply with the height requirements of the RM-1.5 zone as it is shown as being 25 feet above average original grade to the roof line with an additional five feet above the height limit for a sloped roof of 4 inches in 12 inches or greater Attachment 3. Page 9 of 16 Staff Findings – Coverage: ECDC 21.15.110 defines coverage as the total ground coverage of all buildings or structures on a site measured from the outside of external walls or supporting members or from a point two and one-half feet in from the outside edge of a cantilevered roof, whichever covers the greatest area. The application notes a building ground coverage of 3,757 square feet for a coverage of 24% of the 15,682 square foot lot. The proposal is consistent with the coverage requirements of the RM-1.5 zone (Attachment 3; Sheet A00). B. ECDC 17.50.020 – Off-Street Parking Regulations Off-street parking requirements for multifamily developments are detailed in the table in ECDC 17.50.020.A.1.b. The table below provides the parking requirements of ECDC 17.50.020.A.1.b along with the number of units of each dwelling unit type and the number of required parking spaces. Type of multiple dwelling unit Required parking spaces per dwelling unit Number of units in proposal Number of parking spaces required Studio 1.2 1 1.2 1 bedroom 1.5 6 9 2 bedrooms 1.8 3 5.4 3 or more bedrooms 2.0 0 0 Total Spaces Required 15.6 (16) The proposal provides 16 parking spaces. The parking spaces are proposed along the northern property boundary. The proposal is consistent with the off-street parking requirements of Chapter 17.50 ECDC (Attachment 3, Sheet C2.0). C. Chapter 20.11 ECDC – General Design Review ECDC 20.11.010 requires the ADB to review general design review applications that trigger SEPA. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the criteria for Building Design and Site Treatment that must be met. ECDC 20.11.030.A Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets; Staff Findings: A variety of materials and forms are used which creates a building harmonious in scale, line and mass within the development and which will integrate well with the surrounding area. Page 10 of 16 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area; Staff Findings: The proposed colors scheme avoids excessive brilliance or brightness (Attachment 4). 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level; Staff Findings: A PUD vault is proposed near the driveway entrance but is within the landscape area and will be screened from street view. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. a. In multifamily (RM) or commercial zones, selections from among the following or similar features are appropriate for dealing with this criterion: i. Windows with architectural fenestration; ii. Multiple rooflines or forms; iii. Architecturally detailed entries; iv. Appropriate landscaping; v. The use of multiple materials; Staff Findings: The proposed building provides variation in materials and projecting roof forms that help break of the bulk of the building both vertically and horizontally. Additionally site landscaping helps break up massing of the building (Attachments 3 & 4). 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. Staff Findings: The proposed development does not currently propose any signage. Any signage will be reviewed under a subsequent building permit application. ECDC 20.11.030.B Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized to protect natural resources, limit disturbance of native soils, and encourage low impact development. Page 11 of 16 Staff Findings: The site currently contains two single family structures and a duplex with associated parking. The site is basically level and does not have a great deal of existing vegetation or other elements of natural beauty. The site will be re-landscaped after redevelopment is complete as shown in Attachment 3. There will be an increase in impervious surfaces over existing (roofs, driveway, walkways, patios, etc.) but not in excess of what would be expected with the redevelopment of an underutilized multifamily-zoned parcel. All stormwater will be managed in accordance with the City’s stormwater codes. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. Staff Findings: Landscaping consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC is being provided with the development. See the discussion on landscaping requirements in Section 7.D below. 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. Staff Findings: Landscaping is being provided consistent with Chapter 20.13 ECDC and will provide buffers from surrounding properties and soften and shade the parking area. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. Staff Findings: Landscaping within the surface parking area will be protected by curbing. 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. Staff Findings: The proposal includes a trash enclosure located along the rear side of the proposed building, interior to the site, which will provide adequate screening. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. Staff Findings: The landscaping requirements in Chapter 20.13 ECDC for the perimeter include a mix of evergreen and deciduous species that will be effective in screening the site year round. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. Staff Findings: Not applicable. Page 12 of 16 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Staff Findings: Adequate site lighting is provided via the parking lot, pathways to the building, all walkways within the structure and at all unit entries. (Attachment 3, Sheet E10). ECDC 20.11.030(C) Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi-public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Staff Findings: The proposed building is not a community facility. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Staff Findings: No specific street furniture is proposed or required. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the design standards of ECDC 20.11.030. D. Chapter 20.13 ECDC – Landscape Requirements Chapter 20.13 ECDC contains specific landscaping requirements for new developments, which the ADB and Hearing Examiner are allowed to interpret and modify according to ECDC 20.13.000. Three types of landscaping are required for the proposed development. Type II landscaping is required along the south property boundary to buffer the site from the adjacent single-family developments and commercial use to the south; Type III landscaping is required along the property boundaries adjacent to the parking lot and Edmonds Way; and Type V landscaping is required within the surface parking area. ECDC 20.13.030 provides the requirements for each landscaping type. Type II Landscaping. Type II landscaping is intended to create a visual separation between similar uses. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 30 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 20 feet on center; and 2. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height and other plant materials, planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. Staff Findings: Landscaping consistent with the requirements of Type II landscaping is provided along the southern property boundary. Page 13 of 16 Type III Landscaping. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center; and 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years; or 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted: a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth-mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. Staff Findings: Landscaping consistent with the requirements of Type III landscaping is provided adjacent to the parking lot and Edmonds Way. Type V Landscaping. Type V landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. 1. Required Amount. a. If the parking area contains no more than 50 parking spaces, at least 17.5 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. b. If the parking area contains more than 99 parking spaces, at least 35 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. c. If the parking area contains more than 50 but less than 100 parking spaces, the director – or his designee – shall determine the required amount of landscaping by interpolating between 17.5 and 35 square feet for each parking stall proposed. The area must be landscaped as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section. Page 14 of 16 2. Design. a. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 150 square feet of area and must be at least four feet in any direction exclusive of vehicle overhang. The area must contain at least one tree a minimum of six feet in height and with a minimum size of one and one-half inches in caliper if deciduous. The remaining ground area must be landscaped with plant materials, decorative mulch or unit pavers. b. A landscaped area must be placed at the interior ends of each parking row in a multiple lane parking area. This area must be at least four feet wide and must extend the length of the adjacent parking stall. c. Up to 100 percent of the trees proposed for the parking area may be deciduous. d. Repealed by Ord. 4085. e. The minimum area per planter is 64 square feet. f. The maximum area per planter is 1,500 square feet for parking lots greater than 12,000 square feet. Planters shall be spread throughout the parking lot. g. Shade trees are required at the rate of a minimum of one per planter and/or one per 150 square feet of planter. Staff Findings: With 16 parking spaces provided in the surface parking area 280 square feet of Type V landscaping is required. The proposal includes landscaping in excess of what is required and thus meets the Type V landscape requirements within the surface parking area. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the intent and requirements of the landscaping requirements of ECDC 20.13. VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of proposed development applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments within this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for the proposed development under file number PLN20180069 with the following motion and recommended conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICIES OF ECDC 20.10, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGIULATIONS AND APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED MULTI- FAMILY HOMES WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 15 of 16 1. TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PARKS MANAGER. 2. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IS UP TO THE APPLICANT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH VARIOUS PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THESE CODES. 3. STAFF WILL VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPOSAL WITH ALL RELEVANT CODES AND LAND USE PERMIT CONDITIONS THROUGH REVIEW OF BUILDING AND ENGINEERING PERMITS. MINOR CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED BY STAFF AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT WITHOUT FURTHER DESIGN REVIEW BY THE BOARD AS LONG AS THE DESIGN IS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THAT ORIGINALLY APPROVED. IX. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121 – 5th Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RNK Eastside LLC Attn: Constantine Korovkin 2603 78th Ave. NE. Medina, WA 98039 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC Attn: Haynes Lund 385 101st Ave. SE. Bellevue, WA 98004 WSDOT-NW Region Development Services Attn: Peter Alm P.O. Box 330310 MS 240 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133 Snohomish County PUD Attn: Jason Zyskowski P.O. Box 1107 Everett, WA 98206 X. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Application Cover Letter 3. Plan Set and Lighting Details 4. Color Elevations 5. Preliminary Drainage Report 6. SEPA Checklist 7. SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance 8. Zoning and Vicinity Map 9. Critical Area Determination 10. Edmonds Utilities Consortium (EUC) 11. Letter of Complete Application – Request Additional Info Page 16 of 16 12. Notice of Application Documentation and SEPA Determination Documentation 13. Applicant Response Letter 14. Notice of Public Hearing 15. Building Division Comments 16. Fire District Comments 17. Public Works Trash Collection Comments 18. Engineering Division Memo of Consistency 19. Snohomish County PUD Letter 20. WSDOT Email ATTACHMENT 1 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 1 Date: November 30, 2018 Design Review for Edmonds Crossing Apartments 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026 Pre-Application File #PRE2018005 Description of Proposal The site for this project is located along Edmonds Way a short distance south of the intersection with 238th Street SW. It is a triangular lot containing (2) single family residences and (1) duplex residence which were built in 1938, 1965 and 1968. None of these building have any architectural character and all will be demolished for this project. The site is overgrown with trees and shrubs which dominate the appearance from Edmonds Way. The adjoining properties are mostly residential uses, except for an automotive sales lot to the south and a small office building across the street. Edmonds Crossing Apartments would clear the existing site and construct a new 3-story building near the front of the lot. This building will house 10-residential units consisting of a mix of studios, 1- bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments. Parking for these units would be located beside the building along the northwest end of the property. The only street that connects with the site is Edmonds Way. Because of an existing concrete median, access to the site will be strictly right-in and right-out. A one- way semicircular drive has been included along the highway to accommodate the limited access options. This drive also enables service vehicles, such as trash trucks, to access the site without the need to turn around. The existing street frontage is a 4’ wide sidewalk immediately back from the curb. Since there is a driving lane adjacent to the curb, and traffic moves on Edmonds Way at a brisk pace, this situation is not conducive to pedestrian use. This project will revise the street frontage, per City of Edmonds standards, to provide a 4’ wide planting strip between the sidewalk and the curb. This planting strip will extend the full length of the site. The building is set close to the front of the site with a common entry facing Edmonds Way. There is a walkway from the street directly into the structure. Since the ground floor of the building is slightly above the sidewalk elevation, there will be a short flight of stairs on this walkway. To provide accessible access, an alternate path out to the sidewalk is provided which will meet ADA requirements for slope. Edmonds Crossing Apartments is essentially a courtyard arrangement, with all the units being accessed from a central court. What is different about this project is that, on the ground floor, there is a ATTACHMENT 2 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 2 studio unit occupying the courtyard space, and the common outdoor space is raised a level to the roof of this unit. On each side of the courtyard are symmetrical 3-story elements. All of these units, as well as the studio unit, have patios or balconies that face Edmonds Way, which gives the building an open inviting presence on the street. The primary exterior material for this project is lap siding, which is a common finish material in the area. To provide some variety in the façade there are also some areas of vertical siding. The other exterior wall materials are vinyl windows and painted trim. At the base of the wall will be a small strip of rigid insulation with a cementitious coating. The roofing will be asphalt shingles. All of these materials are commonly used for residential construction in this area. Compliance with Urban Design Goals & Policies Design Objectives for Site Design. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. While this project has 2 curb cuts, they are each designed for one-way traffic and will facilitate easy exit and entry from Edmonds Way. The site entry arrangement also has the advantage of providing a staging area for service vehicles that allows them to pull off the street not have to turn around. See Sheet C2.0. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. This project locates the building as close to the front of the site as possible, with the outer edge of the balconies on the front setback line. Parking is located to the side of the structure. See Sheet C2.0 and Sheet A20. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. The main access to the building is directly from the sidewalk. There is a pedestrian walkway from the parking area to the building. Bicycle parking is underneath the stairs along this walkway. There are existing bus stops within easy walking distance (less than 800’). See Sheet A20 and Vicinity Plan on Sheet A00. A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. The main building entry faces the street and there is a direct path to it. The building is sited toward the front of the site and is parallel with the street. There is gathering space in front of the entry of each unit. See Sheets C2.0, A20, A21. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. The adjacent sites to this project are a mixed bag of parking lots and residential structures set back from the street. It would be impossible to connect a building on this site with its neighbors in any meaningful way. By pushing the building forward, this project creates the beginnings of a street 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 3 wall while street providing a small area for landscaping that will be both attractive and provide some degree of privacy for the units. See Sheet L1.0. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. This project has some open space at the south end of the site as well as in the courtyard on the roof of the studio unit. This courtyard will include planter boxes as well as a vegetated wall along one side. It will have sufficient space for seating and other casual outdoor activities. See Sheet L1.0. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way-finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. This project uses traditional materials but it arranges them in a unique manner responsive to the characteristics of the site. See Sheets DR1.0 and DR1.1. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. All walkways within the building are covered. See Sheets A20, A21. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians – including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces – to support activity and security. This project will provide lighting for the parking lot, for all pathways to the building, all walkways within the structure and at all unit entries. See Site Lighting Plan. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city’s emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. This project does not contemplate any signage other than an address number at this time. It is possible that the owner may decide to provide a monument sign to identify the building. See Sheet A30. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. All utility systems will be located toward the side of the building away from the street. Trash storage is hidden from public view within the structure. There is a concrete trash can staging area adjacent to the entry drive. See Sheet A20. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms – such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees – into site design whenever possible. The existing site does not contain any significant trees or other notable landscape features. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. The landscape design utilizes native plant materials to provide buffers along the perimeter of the site, and in front of the parking area. Landscape buffers are also provided at the ground floor patios to enhance the privacy of the units. See Sheet L1.0. 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 4 Design Objectives for Building Form A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. This project offers an arrangement of forms, rooflines, windows and other elements that is unique to this building and is certainly not monotonous. See Sheets DR1.0, DR1.1, A30. A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. This building is broken up into individual unit blocks that minimize the bulk of the building. It presents a number of railings, stairways, doors and individual window units which provide a human scale to the building forms. See Sheets DR1.0, DR1.1, A30. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. Because of the manner in which the building is broken into individual unit blocks, the roof form is simplified in order to tie the structure together. However, it still has variety through projections and changes of level. See Sheets A21, A30. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. The exterior walls of this project are modulated by continuous bands that break the façade down by floors. Finish materials are varied between building elements to provide variety in the façade. See Sheets DR1.0, DR1.1, A30. Design Objectives for Building Façade A.18 Building Façade Design. Encourage building façades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. The building is sited close to the front setback line parallel to Edmonds Way. It establishes the streetscape will providing a structure with strong individual identity. See Sheet C2.0. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a façade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. The design utilizes windows clustered at the building corners, typically, to provide a recurring element to the façade. By locating the windows at the corners direct sunlit penetrates into the building for longer hours of the day. There are operable units within each cluster allowing the opportunity for natural ventilation. See Sheet A30 and floor plans. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building façades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in façade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. The primary finish material on the exterior walls is lap siding. Those areas are further broken down by accent bands at the floor lines. Variety is provided by some of the building forms having vertical siding as the finish material. See Sheets DR1.0, DR1.1, A30. 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 5 Compliance with Urban Design Goals & Policies for Specific Areas This project is not located in any of the specific areas listed in this section, so none of these urban design goals apply to this project. Compliance with Streetscape and Trees Goals & Policies Streetscape and Street Trees Goal A. Enhance the public realm through streetscape and street tree choices. Very few or the specific goals of this policy apply to this project. This project will provide trees in the planting strip across the front of the site in compliance with City standards. See Sheet L1.0. Conformance with General Zoning regulations The lot for this project is zoned RM-1.5. The primary permitted use for this zoning is multiple dwellings at a maximum density of 1500 SF of lot area per unit [ECDC Sec.16.30]. The area of this lot is 15, 682 SF. The maximum number of housing units allowed on the lot is 10. This project will provide 10 units. Per the Site Development standards [ECDC Sec. 16.30.030, Table A], the minimum street setback is 15 and the minimum side setback is 10’. Because this site has a triangular shape, there is no edge of the site for which a rear setback would apply. This project complies with all of these setback requirements (see Sheet C2.0). The maximum coverage for this site is 45%. The project complies with this coverage limitation (see Sheet A00). The maximum allowable building height for this site is 25’, which may be extended to 30’ if the portion of the building above 25’ has a roof slope of 4 in 12 or greater. This project complies with these height limitations (see Sheet A01). This project will provide (1) studio apartment, (6) 1-bedroom apartments and (3) 2-bedroom apartments. The off-street parking requirement for this building is a total of 15.6 parking spaces [ECDC Sec. 17.050.020.A.1.] . This project provides 16 off-street parking spaces on the same lot at the side of the building (See Sheet C2.0). These parking stalls are all at least 8.5‘ wide by 16.5’ long, which meets the requirements for full width parking stalls. The accessible van stall that is included is 9’ wide which meets the requirements of the Americans with Disability Act. The parking aisle width meets the width requirement for 2-way traffic per Figure 18-1 (see Sheet C2.0). This project fully complies with all regulations regarding off-street parking. 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 6 Clearing of the site will be required for this project. A Clearing and Grading permit will be obtained before any such work is undertaken. It is anticipated that all trees and shrubs on the lot will be removed for the construction of this project. The site contains no environmentally sensitive areas or any native growth protection easements. There are no wetlands on the site nor is any portion of the site within the setback area for a wetland. There is no significant vegetation or wildlife habitat on the site that should be protected. All requirements of ECDC Section 18.45.050 will be complied with by this project. As required by ECDC Section 18.30.060, stormwater drainage from this site will comply with the requirements of 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. This will include constructing stormwater collection, conveyance, detention and water quality facilities. The project is proposing a combined water quality and detention vault that will collect and detain stormwater to predeveloped flow rates. Clean stormwater from the vault will be released to the existing storm drainage system located within Edmonds Way (SR 104). Low impact development (LID) best management practices will be evaluated as part of the project based on their feasibility. Because of the few number of daily trips generated by this project, a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. This direction was provided by Bertrand Hauss, City of Edmonds Transportation Engineer, in an email dated 9/5/2018 (attached). No further information regarding the traffic impact of this project is submitted herewith. We believe this project complies fully with all City of Edmonds Design Guidelines and Zoning Regulations that are applicable to this site. We hope that the information we have submitted with this Design Review application will receive your prompt approval. Sincerely, Haynes Lund, AIA LEED© AP Architect Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC 30 November 2018 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 7 VICINITY PLAN1 SITE DATA PARCEL NO.:00463301000302 PROPERTY ADDRESS:23830 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98026 ZONING:RM-1.5, MULTI-FAMILY1500 SF OF LOT PER UNIT LOT AREA:0.36 ACRES (15,682 SF) EXISTING USE:MULTI-FAMILY WITH3 BUILDING ON SITE (TO BE REMOVED) PROPOSED USE:MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING10 UNITS3 STORIES BUILDING ENCLOSED FLOOR AREAS (EXCLUDES EXTERIOR STAIRS, DECKS, ROOF GARDENS)FLOOR 1 2486 SF FLOOR 2 2421 SF FLOOR 3 2421 SF TOTAL 7,688 SF UNIT CONFIGURATION STUDIO 1 UNIT (FLOOR 1 ONLY) 1-BEDROOM 6 UNITS (2 PER FLOOR) 2-BEDROOM 3 UNITS (1 PER FLOOR) BUILDING WILL HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS BUILDING WILL HAVE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. BUILDING CODE INFO USE CLASSIFICATION:R-2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:V-B SPRINKLER SYSTEM:YES, NFPA 13R BASIC ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:60' NUMBER OF STORIES:4 MAX AREA PER FLOOR:7,000 SQ FT ASSUMES NO PERIMETER INCREASE MAX ALLOW TOTAL AREA:21,000 SQ FT PROPOSED HEIGHT:3 STORIES, 35' PROPOSED LARGEST FLOOR:3,451 SQ FTPROPOSED TOTAL BLDG AREA:9,929 SQ FT (GROSS AREA INCLUDING STAIRS, WALKWAYS, DECKS) ZONING RESTRICTIONS MAX. NO. OF UNITS:10 SETBACKS: STREET 15' SIDE 10' TRIANGULAR SITE HAS NO REAR SETBACK MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:25' MAY BE INCREASED TO 30' IF THE HEIGHT ABOVE 25'SLOPES AT A RATE OF 4 IN 12 OR HIGHER. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE:45%LOT AREA =15,682 SFBUILDING FOOTPRINT =3,451 SF ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE =22% NORTH PROJECT SITE DRAWING LIST A00 COVER SHEET A02 BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION A20 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 1 & LEVEL 2 A21 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 3 & ROOF A30 BUILDING ELEVATIONS C1.O CIVIL TITLE SHEET C2.0 PRELIMINARY CIVIL SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN L1.0 PLANTING PLAN L1.1 PLANTING SCHEDULE L1.2 PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS E1.0 SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PERMIT DOCUMENTS BID DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT NAME / CONSULTANT LOGO REVISIONS New ConstrucZon for EDMONDSCROSSINGAPARTMENTS 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA. 98026 SHEET NUMBER ARCHITECT / ENGINEER SEAL PROJECT TITLE / PROJECT ADDRESS © 2016 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects, llc HL HWL 27 OCT 2017 11-30-2018 SHEET TITLE DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DES. REV. RE- SUBMITTAL 2-15-2019 EDMONDS CROSSING APARTMENTS A00 PROJECT DATAVICINITY PLAN BUS STOP,TYPICAL 1 1 ATTACHMENT 3 K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA406.2'401.8'397.6'403.9'K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA 397.9'MAX ALLOWABLE HEIGHT EL = 430'-7 1/4" 3RD FLOORFFE = 417'-0" 2ND FLOOR FFE = 408'-3" GROUND FLOOR FFE = 399'-6" ROOF PLATE FFE = 424'-7 1/4" 4 12 8'-9"8'-9"7'-7 1/4"5'-8"31'-0 3/4"AVERAGE LEVEL FFE = 400'- 7 1/4"25'-0"5'-0"3 1/4"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PERMIT DOCUMENTS BID DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT NAME / CONSULTANT LOGO REVISIONS New ConstrucSon for EDMONDSCROSSINGAPARTMENTS 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA. 98026 SHEET NUMBER ARCHITECT / ENGINEER SEAL PROJECT TITLE / PROJECT ADDRESS © 2016 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects, llc HL HWL 27 OCT 2017 11-30-2018 SHEET TITLE DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DES. REV. RE- SUBMITTAL 2-15-2019 A02 BUILDING HEIGHT& LOT COVERAGECALCULATION BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION2 SITE PLAN / BASE ELEVATION MAP1 N AVERAGE LEVEL CALCULATION CORNER POINT ELEVATIONSSINCE SW CORNER IS OUTSIDE PROPERTY, THATCORNER ELEVATION IS TAKEN AS THE AVERAGEOF THE ELEVATIONS WHERE THE RECTANGLECROSSES THE PROPERTY LINE. SE CORNER =401.8' NE CORNER =397.6' NW CORNER =397.9' SW CORNER =405.1' 1602.4' AVERAGE ELEVATION (1602.4/4) =400.6' [(406.3 + 403.9)/2 = 405.1] AREA OF BUILDING FOR LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION(3757 SF) LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION LOT AREA =15,682 SF MAX. LOT COVERAGE =45% TOTAL BUILDING AREA =3,757 SF ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE = (3757 / 15682) =24% ENCLOSING RECTANGLE FORBUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION 1 1 1 1 COMMONPATIO 285 SF UNIT 21 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 23 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 22 2-BEDROOM1011 SF STORAGE 150 NET SF K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA PLANTER K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA UNIT 11 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 13 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 12 2-BEDROOM1011 SF SPRINK RM 68 NET SF ELECT RM 88 NET SF TRASH50 NET SF BIKEPARK TRASH STAGING AREA PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PERMIT DOCUMENTS BID DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT NAME / CONSULTANT LOGO REVISIONS New ConstrucLon for EDMONDSCROSSINGAPARTMENTS 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA. 98026 SHEET NUMBER ARCHITECT / ENGINEER SEAL PROJECT TITLE / PROJECT ADDRESS © 2016 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects, llc HL HWL 27 OCT 2017 11-30-2018 SHEET TITLE DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DES. REV. RE- SUBMITTAL 2-15-2019 A20 FLOOR PLANSLEVEL 1 & LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN2 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN1 1 1 1 UNIT 31 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 33 1-BEDROOM604 SF UNIT 32 2-BEDROOM1011 SF STORAGE 150 NET SF K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA ROOF @FLOOR 1 ROOF DECK @FLOOR2 RAISED ROOF OVER STAIR ROOF AT FLOOR 1 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PERMIT DOCUMENTS BID DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT NAME / CONSULTANT LOGO REVISIONS New ConstrucLon for EDMONDSCROSSINGAPARTMENTS 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA. 98026 SHEET NUMBER ARCHITECT / ENGINEER SEAL PROJECT TITLE / PROJECT ADDRESS © 2016 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects, llc HL HWL 27 OCT 2017 11-30-2018 SHEET TITLE DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DES. REV. RE- SUBMITTAL 2-15-2019 A21 FLOOR PLANLEVEL 3 &ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN2 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN1 1 1 1 23830 FLOOR 1 FFE = 100'-0" FLOOR 2 FFE = 108'-9" FLOOR 3 FFE = 117'-6" ROOF PLATE FFE = 125'-4 3/4" ANGLED WALL, SEE DETAIL 4 THIS SHEETDECKS HAVE BEEN OMITTEDTO SHOW WALL BEYOND PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PERMIT DOCUMENTS BID DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT NAME / CONSULTANT LOGO REVISIONS New ConstrucRon for EDMONDSCROSSINGAPARTMENTS 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA. 98026 SHEET NUMBER ARCHITECT / ENGINEER SEAL PROJECT TITLE / PROJECT ADDRESS © 2016 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects, llc HL HWL 27 OCT 2017 11-30-2018 SHEET TITLE DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DES. REV. RE- SUBMITTAL 2-15-2019 A30 BUILDINGELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION (TO EDMONDS WAY) 1 NORTH ELEVATION (TO PARKING LOT)2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (BACK)4WEST ELEVATION3 REFERENCE ELEVATION 100'-0" = ACTUAL ELEVATION 399'-9" NORTHWEST ELEVATION2 1 1 1 EDMONDS WAY (SR 104)228THST SW226THPL W68TH AVE W Vert. Scale Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS No. Horiz. Scale Vert. Scale Project No.Date Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS DateDescription Client ContactKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY OF EDMONDSBY:CITY ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATE:NKJ NKJ WPH WPH 2-15-2019410-002-18 - 1"=20'THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 31, T 27 N., R 4E.MR. CONSTANTINE KOROVKIN 2603 78TH AVENUE NE MEDINA, WA 98039 - - EDMOND APARTMENTS TITLE SHEETC1.0 N1"=2000'VICINITY MAPPROJECTLOCATIONVICINITY MAPTAX PARCELSSITE ADDRESSZONINGENGINEERAPPLICANTSURVEYORLEGAL DESCRIPTIONVERTICAL DATUMNBASIS OF BEARINGSFEBRUARY 15, 2019EDMONDS APARTMENTSDESIGN REVIEWOWNERCONSTRUCTION HOURSNOTENSheet List TableSHEETNUMBERSHEET TITLEBENCHMARKMERIDIAN EDMONDS WAY (SR 104)FIRE LANE-NO PARKINGFIRE LANE-NO PARKING FIRE LANE-NO PARKINGFIR E L A N E - N O P A R K I N G FIRE LANE-NO PARKINGFIRE LANE-NO PARKINGFIRE LANE-NO PAR K I N G FIRE LANE-NO PARKINGVert. Scale Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS No. Horiz. Scale Vert. Scale Project No.Date Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS DateDescription Client ContactKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY OF EDMONDSBY:CITY ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATE:NKJ NKJ WPH WPH 2-15-2019410-002-18 - 1"=20'THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 31, T 27 N., R 4E.MR. CONSTANTINE KOROVKIN 2603 78TH AVENUE NE MEDINA, WA 98039 - - EDMOND APARTMENTS C2.0 NLEGENDPRELIMINARY CIVIL SITE PLAN EDMONDS WAY (SR 104)FF=399'9"Vert. Scale Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS No. Horiz. Scale Vert. Scale Project No.Date Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS DateDescription Client ContactKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY OF EDMONDSBY:CITY ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATE:NKJ NKJ WPH WPH 2-15-2019410-002-18 - 1"=20'THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 31, T 27 N., R 4E.MR. CONSTANTINE KOROVKIN 2603 78TH AVENUE NE MEDINA, WA 98039 - - EDMOND APARTMENTS PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLANC3.0 NNOTE: EDMONDS WAY (SR 104)Vert. Scale Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS No. Horiz. Scale Vert. Scale Project No.Date Approved By Checked By Designed By Drawn By REVISIONS DateDescription Client ContactKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY OF EDMONDSBY:CITY ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATE:NKJ NKJ WPH WPH 2-15-2019410-002-18 - 1"=20'THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 31, T 27 N., R 4E.MR. CONSTANTINE KOROVKIN 2603 78TH AVENUE NE MEDINA, WA 98039 - - EDMOND APARTMENTS PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANC4.0 N Design Two Four/Two Six,Inc. 14835 161ST COURT SE RENTON, WA 98059 ph. (425) 881-2426 cll.(206) 335-7719 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture Irrigation Planning Athletic Field Design Construction Management JA S O N M. ANDERSO N N O. 0936 EXP. 08/24 /2 0 18L A NDSCAPE ARCH IT E C T PLANT SCHEDULE Design Two Four/Two Six,Inc. 14835 161ST COURT SE RENTON, WA 98059 ph. (425) 881-2426 cll.(206) 335-7719 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture Irrigation Planning Athletic Field Design Construction Management JA S O N M. ANDERSO N N O. 0936 EXP. 08/24 /2 0 18L A NDSCAPE ARCH IT E C T Design Two Four/Two Six,Inc. 14835 161ST COURT SE RENTON, WA 98059 ph. (425) 881-2426 cll.(206) 335-7719 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture Irrigation Planning Athletic Field Design Construction Management JA S O N M. ANDERSO N N O. 0936 EXP. 08/24 /2 0 18L A NDSCAPE ARCH IT E C TPLANTING NOTES DATA SUMMARY Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Label Calc Type Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Numeric Summary Illuminance Fc 1.5 7.4 0.1 15.0 : 1 74.0 : 1 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Type Symbol Manufacturer / Catalog # UTOPIA LIGHTING LAP-2G-72LED-TYPE3 Mounted 25ft Above Grade.72W LED 3 Tot. Description Lamp Description # of Type UTOPIA LIGHTING2329 E Pacica Pl. Rancho Dominguez, CA 90220TEL: 310) 327 - 7711FAX: 310) 327 - 5711K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRPK-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINAK-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRPK-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINAK-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRPK-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINAK-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRPK-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-1542TERRACINABATH/SHOWERFRP K-3322-RAGABRIELLETOILETSVITREOUS CHINA!"#$%&' ($!)#*++,%(- !"#$%&& &./0)1**23'+%(- !"#$%&4 &./0)1**23'+%(- !"#$%&55./0)1**2&'&&%(- (61#"7%12,+%"0$%(- 0809$%12:5%"0$%(- LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Type Symbol Manufacturer / Catalog # UTOPIA LIGHTING BLD1-A-25LED 25W LED 1 Tot. Description Lamp Description # of Type 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.3 1.7 0.8 0.3 1.0 6.3 6.2 2.1 0.5 0.9 5.4 7.4 1.7 0.5 0.4 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.8 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.0 1.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.2 Design Two Four/Two Six,Inc. 14835 161ST COURT SE RENTON, WA 98059 ph. (425) 881-2426 cll.(206) 335-7719 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture Irrigation Planning Athletic Field Design Construction Management JA S O N M. ANDERSO N N O. 0936 EXP. 08/24 /2 0 18L A NDSCAPE ARCH IT E C T PLANT SCHEDULE Design Two Four/Two Six,Inc. 14835 161ST COURT SE RENTON, WA 98059 ph. (425) 881-2426 cll.(206) 335-7719 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture Irrigation Planning Athletic Field Design Construction Management JA S O N M. ANDERSO N N O. 0936 EXP. 08/24 /2 0 18L A NDSCAPE ARCH IT E C T 1 www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT LAP-2G FEATURES: • Die-cast aluminium construction body on which electrical components. • Die-cast integral heat sink to provide thermal management. MOUNTING: • PMS: Pole mount arm available for 3”, 4” and 5” square pole. • PMR: Pole mount arm available for 3” (PMR3), 4” (PMR4) and 5” (PMR5) dia. round pole. • SF: Adjustable slip fitter mount available for pipe installation (1-21/32”O.D to 2-3/8”O.D) • WM: Wall mount plate. • Mounting arm bolts are 304 stainless steel and zinc- plated steel. • MA: Available for 2.375”(O.D) sized Mast Arm Pole. • MA2: Availabel for 1.900”(O.D) sized Mast Arm Pole. LED: • Color Temperature: 3000 / 4000 / 5000K • Color Rendering Index: 70+ CRI. • Nichia LED. • Lifetime: over 50,000 hours. • Optical lens is used to reduce glare. ELECTRICAL: • UL, FCC certified input voltage range: 100V-277V, 50/60Hz • Power factor >90%, THD <20% • 72LED: Class 2 LED electronic driver. • 108LED, 141LED, 188LED: Class 1 electronic driver. • Fixture for ambient minimum operating temperatures from -40°C to 40°C (110W can reach +50°C). • Provided with integrated surge protection (6kV line- line, 10kV line-earth). • Optional integrated 10kV/10kA surge protection available (SP10). • Over Voltage Protect : Hiccup mode. The power supply shall return to normal operation only after the power is turn-on again. • Short Circuit Protect : No damage shall occur when any output operating in a short circuit condition. The power supply shall be self-recovery when the fault condition is removed. • Over Temperature Protect : 110°C • Meets ANSI/IEEE C62.41 Category C (outdoors) High. • Waterproof (IP67) and UL Dry / Damp / Wet Location outdoor LED driver. OPTIC: • UV stabilized polycarbonate lens. LISTING: • UL / CUL listed. • DLC listed. 3 • ARRA compliant. (optional) • Suitable for wet location. • Tested to IESNA LM80 standards. • LM79, LM80. • 5 years limited warranty. • 7 or 10 years limited warranty. (optional) 4 • IP66 Rating. • Certified to ANSI C136.31-2010, 3.0G Level 2 for Bridge/Overpass Applications. APPLICATION For all applications in site, area, and general lighting requiring high uniformity, excellent vertical light distribution, reduced offsite visibility, reduced on-site glare and effective security light levels. The LAP luminaire delivers exceptional performance in a low-profile design. CONFIGURATIONS Revised: 10.10.2018 Type Input Rating Lumen Output(lm/w)Total LumenOutput Drive Currentper LED EPA Rating(sq ft max.)B.U.G. Rating Weight (lbs/kg) 72 T2 72W 106.1 lm 7644 lm 1.4 A 1.39 B3-U0-G3 23.17 lbs / 10.51 kgT3123.3 lm 8977 lm B2-U0-G2 T4M 124.5 lm 9064 lm B2-U0-G2 T5S 127.4 lm 9251 lm B3-U0-G2 108 T2 108W 107.8 lm 12359 lm 2.1 A 1.56 B3-U0-G3 25.38 lbs / 11.51 kgT3109.7 lm 11753 lm B3-U0-G3 T4M 127.2 lm 13650 lm B3-U0-G3 T5S 129.6 lm 13932 lm B4-U0-G3 141 T2 141W 110.7 lm 15768 lm 2.8 A 1.73 B3-U0-G3 26.7 lbs / 12.11 kgT3115.5 lm 16370 lm B3-U0-G3 T4M 126.8 lm 17854 lm B3-U0-G3 T5S 131.9 lm 18831 lm B4-U0-G3 188 T2 188W 112.3 lm 21554 lm 3.8 A 2.08 B4-U0-G4 27.36 lbs / 12.41 kgT3131.9 lm 24645 lm B4-U0-G4 T4M 121.6 lm 22862 lm B3-U0-G3 T5S 137.2 lm 25856 lm B5-U0-G3 2www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LAP-2G LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT MODEL LED COLOR TEMP.DISTRIBUTION VOLTAGE DIMMING FINISH LAP-2G 72LED108LED141LED 188LED 72W108W141W188W /30/40/50 3000K4000K5000K (Std.) T2 T3 T4M T5S Type II Type III Type IV Medium Type V Short UNV347480 120-277V (Std.)347V480V DM 0-10V Dimming.(Std.)BZGRWH BK Dark Bronze (Std.)GrayWhiteBlack MOUNTING OPTIONS SFWMPMSPMR3PMR4 PMR5MA MA2 Slip FitterWall MountSquare Pole Mount Arm3” Round Pole Mount Arm4” Round Pole Mount Arm5” Round Pole Mount ArmHorizontal Tenon Mount(Mounts to 2” IP, 2.375” O.D)Horizontal Tenon Mount(Mounts to 1-1/2” IP, 1.900” O.D) HSRCRC7TLPC1TLPC2 TLPC3TLPC-SCRS SP10 House ShieldNEMA twist-lock receptacle only (no controls)NEMA 7-wire receptacle only (no controls)3-Pin NEMA Twist Lock Receptacle Photocell 120V3-Pin NEMA Twist Lock Receptacle Photocell 277V3-Pin NEMA Twist Lock Receptacle Photocell 120V - 277VShorting CapRemote handheld configuration tool for FSP-211 Integrated 10kV/10kA surge protection FSP-211(L2)(L3)(L4)(L7) ARRABRO7WO10W 0-10V Dimming Control Occupancy Sensor 1, 2 FSP-L2 Lens @ 8’ height (up to 44’ diameter) FSP-L3 Lens @ 20’ height (up to 40’ diameter) FSP-L4 Lens @ 40’ height (up to 60’ diameter) FSP-L7 Lens @ 40’ height (up to 100’ diameter)Assembled in USA for Buy American actBird Guard, Stainless Steel SpikesOptional 7 Years Limited Warranty 4 Optional 10 Years Limited Warranty 4 ORDERING INFORMATION EXAMPLE: LAP-2G-108LED/50-T3-UNV-DM-BZ-WM * Available custom color (RAL) Please provide us with the RAL number. NOTES: 1. Must specify lens. (L2, L3, L4, L7)2. Default settings are Title 24 compliant for all spaces that do not require daylighting. For spaces that do require it, adjustments will be necessary for the Hold Off Setpoint and the Photocell functions.3. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. 4. This limited warranty covers electrical parts only and does not apply to labor, equipment lease, or defect from improper installation or operation.5. Standard dimming 0-10V, ANSI C136.41, Photocell and shorting cap by others. * Contact Factory for more options Polar Candela Distribution (TYPE 3 medium + House Shield) Polar Candela Distribution (TYPE 3 medium) 6,900 5,750 4,600 3,450 2,300 1,150 0 Downward Street Side 8,120.0 92.1% Downward House Side 701.5 8% Downward Total 8,821.5 100% Downward Street Side 7,304.4 62.2% Downward House Side 4,448.7 37.9% Downward Total 11,753.1 100% 6,400 5,333 4,267 3,200 2,133 1,067 0 3 www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT LAP-2G Mounting for Round Pole Mounting for Square Pole * Optional TLPC shown Mounting for Slip Fitter Wall Mount Horizontal Tenon Mount LAP-2G-72LED-T2 LAP-2G-108LED-T2 LAP-2G-141LED-T2 LAP-2G-188LED-T4M LAP-2G-108LED-T4M LAP-2G-188LED-T2 LAP-2G-141LED-T4M LAP-2G-72LED-T4M * Effective Projected Area (EPA) with Square Pole Mounting. 4www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LAP-2G LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT 72W 18.22 (462.8) 17.74(450.8)19.01(482.9) 19.49(495.2) 8.7(220.9)9.7(246.6) 10.4(262.9) 8.7(220.9) 8(200.8) 6.6(168) 1(25.4) 0.39 (10.0) 3.5(90) 10.22 (259.7) 0.4 (10) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2(50.8) 50.0 15.46 (392.8) 15.46(392.8)15.46(392.8) 15.46(392.8) 2(50.8) 0.47(12.0) Mounting for Round Pole Mounting for Square Pole Mounting for Slip Fitter Wall Mount * Optional FSP-211 shown * Optional TLPC shown 5.7(144.8) 5.7 (144.8) Horizontal Tenon Mount 21.25(539.8) 10.25(259.7) 2.625(66.8) 2.5(63.3) 2.125(55.4)6(151.5) 15.5(394.8) 5 www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT LAP-2G 108W 20(513.8) 19.7(500.8)21(533.8) 21.5 (545.2) 8.7(220.9)9.7(246.6) 10.4 (262.9) 8.7(220.9) 8(200.8) 6.6 (168) 1 (25.4) 0.39(10.0) 3.5(90)10.22 (259.7) 0.4(10) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2(50.8) 50.0 17.47(443.8) 17.47(443.8)17.47(443.8) 17.47 (443.8) 2(50.8) 0.47 (12.0) Mounting for Round Pole Mounting for Square Pole Mounting for Slip Fitter Wall Mount * Optional FSP-211 shown * Optional TLPC shown 5.7(144.8) 5.7(144.8) 23.2(588.8) 10.22(259.7) 2.4(62.0)2.5(64.5) 2.2(55.4) 1.9 (49.8) 7.3(184)8.3(210.0)5.7(145.0) 5.9(151.5) 17.5(443.8) 6www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LAP-2G LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT 141W 21.7(551.8) 23.4(594.8)22.2 (564.8) 23.5(596.2) 9.7(246.6) 8.7(220.9) 8.7(220.9) 8(200.8) 6.6(168) 1(25.4) 0.39(10.0) 10.22(259.7)3.5(90) 10.22 (259.7) 10.22(259.7) 10.22 (259.7) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 19.5(494.8) 19.5(494.8)19.5(494.8) 19.5(494.8) 2(50.8) 0.47(12.0) 2(50.8) 0.47(12.0) Mounting for Round PoleMounting for Square Pole Mounting for Slip FitterWall Mount * Optional FSP-211 shown * Optional TLPC shown 5.7 (144.8)5.7 (144.8) 25.2(639.8) 10.22(259.7) 2.4(62.0)2.5(64.5) 2.2(55.4) 1.9(49.8)9.3(235)8.3(210.0)5.7(145.0) 5.9(151.5) 19.5(494.8) Horizontal Tenon Mount 7 www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT LAP-2G 188W 26.4(669.3) 26.4(669.3) 27.7(702.7) 10.22(259.7) 10.22 (259.7) 10.22(259.7) 23.6 (599.3) 23.6(599.3) 23.7(601.3) 8.7(220.9) 8.7(220.9) 2.2(55.4) 2.2(55.4) 9.7(246.6) 2.2 (55.4) 10.22(259.7) 26(658.3) 10.4(262.9) 8(200.8) 6.6 (168) 1 (25.4) 0.39(10.0) 3.5 (90) 23.7(601.3) 2(50.8) 0.39 (10.0) 2(50.8) 0.39(10.0) Mounting for Round Pole Mounting for Square Pole Mounting for Slip Fitter Wall Mount * Optional FSP-211 shown * Optional TLPC shown 5.7(144.8) 5.7(144.8) 29.2(741.8) 10.22(259.7) 2.4 (62.0)2.5 (64.5) 2.2(55.4) 1.9(49.8)13.3(337.0)8.3(210.0) 5.9(151.5) 23.5(596.8) Horizontal Tenon Mount 8www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LAP-2G LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT FSP-211 Description: • The FSP-211 mounts in an outdoor lighting fixture and provides multi-level control based on motion. The sensor also includes a photocell to measure the ambient light level. It controls 0-10 VDC LED drivers or dimming ballasts, as well as non-dimming ballasts and, with an FSP-Lx Lens, is rated for wet and cold locations. All control parameters are adjustable via a wireless configuration tool capable of storing and transmitting sensor profiles. Wireless Handheld Configuration Tool: • Initial setup and subsequent sensor adjustments are made using a handheld configuration tool (FSIR-100). This tool enables adjustment of parameters including high and low modes, sensitivity, time delay, cut off and more. The FSIR-100 is also used to initiate automatic calibration of the FSP-211 ambient light level setpoint. The setpoint is used to hold the controlled lighting off or at low level when there is sufficient daylight. The wireless tool stores up to five sensor parameter profiles to speed configuration of multiple sensors. Operation: • The sensor ramps lighting On to the selected High mode level when motion is first detected and the ambient light level is below the hold off setpoint. After the sensor stops detecting movement and the time delay elapses, lights fade to the Low mode level. If there is no motion during the subsequent cut off time delay, the lights will turn Off. If the sensor detects motion before the lights turn Off, it ramps the light level back to High, unless the daylight contribution is sufficient to hold lighting at Low. Applications: • The slim, low-profile FSP-211 is designed for installation inside the bottom of a light fixture body. When fully assembled and installed in an IP66-rated fixture, the sensor and FSP-Lx lenses are IP66 outdoor rated. The sensor is ideal for areas such as parking facilities, gas stations, pedestrian pathways and warehouses. A choice of four lenses ensures complete coverage for mounting heights up to 40’. • Provides line voltage On/Off switching and 0-10 VDC dimming control • Works with ballasts or LED drivers • High and low modes fully adjustable from 0 to 10V • Time delay from 5 to 30 minutes • Optional cut off delay • Adjustable ramp up and fade down times • Optional daylighting setpoint features automatic calibration, or permits manual adjustment • Configuration tool stores five sensor profiles for quick setup and adjustment of multiple sensors • Polycarbonate construction; flame retardant, UV resistant, impact resistant, recyclable • UL244A and UL508; IP66 rated (when fully assembled and installed) for use in wet locations • 120/277 VAC, 50/60Hz - Load @120 VAC 0-800W ballast or incandescent - Load @277 VAC 0-1200W ballast • 230 VAC, 50Hz; Load 0-300W ballast • Relay life rating: 200,000 cycles (120/277 VAC); 50,000 cycles (230 VAC) • High mode: 0-10 V; default 10 V • Low mode: Off, 0-9.8 V; default 1 V • Time delay: 30 sec., 5-30 min.; default 5 min. • Cut off delay: none, 1-60 min. 1-5 hrs.; default 1 hr. • Sensitivity: none, low, med, max; default max • Setpoint: none, 1-250 fc, auto; default 4 fc • Ramp up time: none, 1-60 sec.; default none • Fade down time: none, 1-60 sec.; default none • Operating temperature: -40-167°F (-40-75°C) • Operating Humidity: 20-90% • Weight: 2.8 oz (80 grams) • IP66, CE compliant • TUV, UL and cUL listed • Five year warranty • Fully adjustable high and low dimmed light levels • Designed for LED fixtures; rated for extreme temperatures and up to 200,000 on/off cycles • Hold off setpoint with automatic calibration option for convenience and added energy savings • Adjustable via handheld wireless configuration tool • IP66 rated with choice of lenses for wet and outdoor locations, and mounting heights from 8’ to 40’ • Adjustable time delay and cut off delay Digital High/Low Passive Infrared Fixture Integrated Outdoor Sensor by Wattstopper Product Overview Features Specifications 9 www.utopialightingus.com UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice. LED AREA / PARKING / STREET LIGHT LAP-2G Dimming Wiring Diagram LINEGRNDLOADFSP-211High/Low PIROccupancy Sensor230 VAC, 50 HZ1200W max ballast 14-18 AWG Solid CU Wire Only Class 2 Wiring Only18-20 AWG Solid CU Wire Only5E4 15195r1DIM- (grey)LINEDIM+ (violet)NEUTNEUTRAL NEUTRAL LOAD GRAY (-) VIOLET (+) GROUND *GROUND * The FSP-211 must be properly grounded. LOAD LINENEUTRALDimmingDriver Non-DimmingDriver NEUTRALNon-Dimming Wiring Diagram GRNDLOADFSP-211 High/Low PIROccupancy Sensor230 VAC, 50 HZ1200W max ballast 14-18 AWG Solid CU Wire Only Class 2 Wiring Only18-20 AWG Solid CU Wire Only5E4 15195r1DIM- (grey)LINEDIM+ (violet)NEUT UTOPIA LIGHTING reserves the right to change specifications, drawings, dimensions without prior notice.86www.utopialighting.com SSS SQUARESTRAIGHT STEEL 10’ - 35’Mounting Height DESIGNThe standards as shown in this section are design to withstand dead loads and theoretical dynamic loads developed by variable wind speeds as charted with an appropriate gust factor under the following conditions:The luminaire(s) and/or mounting bracket(s) center of gravity is assumed to be located at the pole top for all designs. For purposes of design, effective projected area (EPA) is considered to be the product of the actual projected area and the drag coefficient. The listed weights include luminaire(s) and/or mounting bracket(s). The wind velocities are based on 10 mph increments from 80 mph through 100 mph. Standards to be located in areas of known abnormal conditions require special consideration. For example: coastal areas, airports, and areas of special winds such as the Chinook type along the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains. POLE SHAFT The pole shall be a one section design fabricated from standard 11 gauge (0.120”) steel or 7 gauge (0.180”). Each section shall be fabricated from hot rolled carbon steel. Hot dipped galvanized to ASTM-A-123/ A-123M with a minimum yield strength of 55,000 psi. HAND HOLEThe reinforcing hand hole rim consists of a nominal 3’’ x 5’’ rectangular shaped tubing material. It is provided with a cover plate, attachment bar and machine screw. GROUNDING Shaft is furnished with ground bolt located inside pole on wall opposite hand hole and a ground bolt will be welded. ANCHOR BOLTSAnchor bolts are hot dipped galvanized in accordance to ASTM-A-153. Anchor bolts are fabricated from hot rolled steel bar with a minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi. Four anchor bolts are provided per pole. Each anchor bolt is furnished with two hex nuts and two flat washers and one lock washer. ANCHOR BASE PLATE The anchor base is fabricated from structural quality hot rolled carbon steel with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi. The base plate telescopes the pole shaft and is circumferentially welded top and bottom. The base is provided with bolt slots. POLE BASE COVER The base cover is fabricated from hot-rolled carbon steel. The covers are two piece assemblies secured together with two fasteners. POLE TOPEach pole will be provided with removable top cap with drill-mount poles or 2-3/8” x 4” pole top tenons. (Optional other sizes available) FINISHAll pole, mounting brackets and platforms are furnished with polyester powder coated or hot dipped galvanized. OPTIONS:AT: 2-3/8”OD x 4” TenonBT: 2-7/8”OD x 4” Tenon CT: 3”OD x 4” TenonBC: Base Cover DR: Duplex ReceptacleGFI: Ground Fault Inter. FINISH:BZ: Dark Bronze BK: BlackGN: GreenWT: White GA: Hot Dip GalvanizedCC: Custom Color MODEL OPTION FINISH SSS-11-420 BC BZ ORDER GUIDE : EPA (ft2) with 1.3 gust A: Wall Thickness Hand Hole E: Base Plate Thickness H: Height B: Shaft Size Base Plate Base Detail Bolt Circle Pole Shaft D: Width Projection Base CoverAnchor Bolt NOTE: 1. Install with two fixture or more, use longer anchor bolts : 3/4”x30”L 2. Install with two fixture or more, use longer anchor bolts : 1”x36”L MOD NUMBER WALL SHAFT SIZE HT.BASE PLATE BOLT CIRCLE ANCHOR BOLTS EPA 100 MPH SHIP WT.A B H D E SSS-11-410 SSS-11-412 SSS-11-414 SSS-11-416 SSS-11-418 SSS-11-420 SSS-11-4251 .120” .120” .120” .120” .120” .120” .120” 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 10’ 12’ 14’ 16’ 18’ 20’ 25’ 9” 9” 9” 9” 9” 9” 12” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 9-3/8” 9-3/8” 9-3/8” 9-3/8” 9-3/8” 9-3/8” 12-3/4” 3/4”x16”L 3/4”x16”L 3/4”x16”L 3/4”x16”L 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 19.0 14.9 11.8 9.0 6.8 4.6 1.0 75# 90# 100# 115# 125# 140# 160# SSS-7-420 SSS-7-4251 .180” .180” 4” SQ. 4” SQ. 20’ 25’ 12” 12” 3/4” 3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 11.9 5.5 155# 210# SSS-11-520 SSS-11-5251 SSS-11-5302 .120” .120” .120” 5” SQ. 5” SQ. 5” SQ. 20’ 25’ 30’ 12” 12” 12” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x36”L 9.5 3.8 2.1 188# 230# 272# SSS-7-520 SSS-7-5251 SSS-7-5302 .180” .180” .180” 5” SQ. 5” SQ. 5” SQ. 20’ 25’ 30’ 12” 12” 12” 3/4” 3/4” 3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x36”L 16.1 9.6 4.1 260# 385# 470# SSS-11-620 SSS-11-6251 .120” .120” 6” SQ. 6” SQ. 20’ 25’ 12” 12” 3/4” 3/4” 12-3/4” 12-3/4” 3/4”x24”L 3/4”x24”L 17.2 8.5 212# 295# Design Review Submi/alEDMONDS CROSSING APARTMENTS 23830 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98026 DATE:30 NOV 2018 REAR VIEW FROM NORTHWEST DR 1.1REVISED:15 FEB 2019ATTACHMENT 4 Design Review Submi/alEDMONDS CROSSING APARTMENTS 23830 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98026 DATE:30 NOV 2018 FRONT VIEW FROM NORTHEAST DR1.0REVISED:15 FEB 2019 February 19, 2019 Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report 23830 Edmonds Way SDA Project #410-002-18 Prepared for: Constantine Korovkin 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026 CIVIL ENGINEERING | PROJECT MANAGEMENT | PLANNING 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140, Everett, WA 98201 | 425.486.6533 | www.sdaengineers.com ATTACHMENT 5 Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Prepared For: Constantine Korovkin 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026 Prepared By: SDA Engineers 1724 West Marine View Drive, Ste 140 Everett, WA 98201 (425) 486-6533 Last save by: Ken McIntyre on 2/20/19 R:\Projects\410 (LZG Construction)\002-18 (Edmonds Apt)\Technical\Reports\2019-02-19 EW Drainage Report.docm Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Vicinity Map SECTION 1 - PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS Step 1: Site Analysis: Collect and Analyze Information on Existing Conditions Step 2: Prepare Preliminary Development Layout Step 3: Perform an Off-Site Analysis Step 4: Determine and Read the Applicable Minimum Requirements Step 5: Prepare a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan Step 6: Prepare a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Appendix 1A – Existing Condition Summary Documents Appendix 1B – Downstream Flowpath Analysis Appendix 1C – Upstream Basin Analysis SECTION 2 – CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION (SWPP) 1.0 - Introduction 2.0 - Site Description 3.0 - Construction Stormwater BMPs 4.0 - Construction Phasing and BMP Implementation 5.0 - Pollution Prevention Team 6.0 - Site Inspections & Monitoring 7.0 - Reporting & Recordkeeping Appendix 2A - Site Plan with BMP Measures Appendix 2B - SWPPP Project Summary Appendix 2C - Alternative BMPs Appendix 2D - General Permit Appendix 2E - Site Log & Inspection Forms SECTION 3 – SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLUTION Source Control of Pollution SECTION 4 - PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS Natural Drainage Course Description SECTION 5 - ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Performance Standards Existing Site Hydrology Developed Site Hydrology Appendix 5A – Basin Mapping Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 6 - RUNOFF TREATMENT Runoff Treatment SECTION 7 - FLOW CONTROL Existing Site Hydrology Synopsis Developed Site Hydrology Synopsis Flow Control Performance Standards Appendix 7A –Flow Control Design Calculations SECTION 8 - WETLANDS PROTECTION SECTION 9 – OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project proposes the construction of an apartment building on a single existing parcel occupying approximately 0.36-ac on the southwest side of Edmonds Way. The project is located in the SW ¼ of Section 31, Township 27 N, Range 4 E, W.M. More specifically, the project is located at 23830 Edmonds Way, and occupies Snohomish County Tax Parcel No. 0043601000302. A vicinity map has been included as Figure 1 of this document. The site is currently developed, and appears to contain two residential buildings as well as an accessory structure. The remainder of the project contains some ornamental trees and traditional residential lawn and landscaping. The project site is triangular in shape, and bounded on the northeast side by Edmonds Way (SR 104). The project is bounded on the northwest and south sides by existing residential parcels. The underlying topography generally falls moderately to the north and northwest. Surface runoff can be expected to follow this topography, following the existing slope to the north and northwest. The project appears to be within a single threshold discharge area, as all runoff from the site appears to be intercepted within the Edmonds Way right-of-way within a short distance of the site. The USDA Web Soil Survey identifies the underlying soil unit as a “till” variety of soil, which typically will not support infiltration of surface runoff, so the project will utilize underground stormwater detention as a flow-control measure. Date Project No. Drawn Design Figure No. Scale NKJ NKJ 2-13-19 410-002-18 EDMONDS APARTMENTS VICINITYMAP N.T.S. 1 228TH STSW PROJECTLOCATION Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 1 PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS (Minimum Requirement #1) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS The project is required to provide stormwater management techniques consistent with Chapter 18.30 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). This code generally adopts the 2014 Edition of the WA Dept. of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, with an addendum issued by the City dated 12/21/2016. These two documents will be referred to throughout this report as “DOE Manual” and “City Addendum”, respectively. This report, along with the accompanying plans, is intended to satisfy the site plan preparation requirements outlined in the regulatory documents listed above. Stormwater site plans are prepared by completing the steps below, as outlined in Volume 1, Chapter 3 of the DOE Manual: Step 1: Site Analysis: Collect and Analyze Information on Existing Conditions A boundary and topographic survey was prepared for the project site, and was used as a basis for the engineering plans. The USDA Web Soil Survey identifies the underlying soil unit as “McKenna gravelly silt loam”. McKenna soils are typically considered to be a glacially-consolidated till soil, with a hardpan layer. These soils typically exhibit moderate runoff rates and very little capacity for infiltration. The map also shows a very small portion of the site as being underlain by “Alderwood-Urban Land Complex”, which is another till unit. There may be an interface between these two soil units at or near the site, but both can be expected to exhibit similar hydrologic responses. A USDA Web Soil Survey map is provided in Appendix 1A of this report. FEMA identifies the project site on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel #53061C1315, which is a non-printed panel. The project site is not expected to be within a flood hazard area. A portion of the FIRM map is provided in Appendix 1A of this report. The City’s GIS database identifies an erosion hazard area on the site, due to a slope that ranges between 15% and 40%. This slope extends through the middle of the site, essentially being a step between the two existing building pads on-site. The slope is less than 10-ft high, and the proposed apartment building will be constructed over this slope, so the erosion hazard is not expected to remain following the proposed development. The project will create a 2H:1V slope along the southern boundary of the site, which can be stabilized with vegetation. No other critical areas were identified on or near the site. A critical areas map is provided in Appendix 1A of this report. Step 2: Prepare Preliminary Development Layout A set of engineering plans are being provided to the City with this report to depict the proposed development layout. Step 3: Perform an Off-Site Analysis A site visit was conducted on January 31, 2019, and the conditions were clear and cool, with no significant rainfall having occurred within the previous couple of days. No surface runoff was observed at the project site or the nearby downstream flowpath. The site topography generally falls to the north and northwest, and is ultimately tributary to the public storm drainage network in Edmonds Way. The public drainage network extends northwesterly beneath Edmonds Way for the entire ¼-mile downstream analysis zone. The downstream flowpath is depicted on a map in Appendix 1B. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report The entire ¼-mile downstream flowpath is contained within an underground pipe network. From surface- visible observation, the downstream pipes appear to be concrete, ranging from 12-inch to 36-inch in diameter. No significant issues or concerns were noted during the field investigation. The project site appears to lie at a relative high point, and there does not appear to be any significant upstream runoff contribution to the site. The Edmonds Way frontage and parcel to the west lie below the elevation of the site itself. The topography along the southern property boundary appears to fall roughly parallel to the boundary itself, so no significant off-site runoff is expected to be received from the south. Step 4: Determine and Read the Applicable Minimum Requirements The project proposes more than 5,000 square feet of new/replaced hard surface, and therefore, all minimum requirements from the City Addendum are applicable to all new/replaced hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas. This requires preparation of Category 2 Stormwater Site Plans, as prescribed by the City Addendum. Step 5: Prepare a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan A set of engineering plans are being provided to the City with this report to depict the proposed development layout. Step 6: Prepare a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan The accompanying engineering plans include an erosion & sediment control plan for the project. That drawing, along with Section 2 of this report are intended to be the stormwater pollution prevention plan for this project. The project site proposes less than 1-acre of disturbance, so a DOE Construction Stormwater Permit will not be required for this project. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 1A EXISTING CONDITION SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Soil Map—Snohomish County Area, Washington (Edmonds Apartments) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/19/2019 Page 1 of 352923005292310529232052923305292340529235052923605292300529231052923205292330529234052923505292360548590548600548610548620548630548640548650548660548670548680548690 548590 548600 548610 548620 548630 548640 548650 548660 548670 548680 548690 47° 46' 58'' N 122° 21' 4'' W47° 46' 58'' N122° 20' 59'' W47° 46' 55'' N 122° 21' 4'' W47° 46' 55'' N 122° 20' 59'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 0 20 40 80 120 Feet 0 5 10 20 30 Meters Map Scale: 1:504 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Snohomish County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 10, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 7, 2014—Jul 8, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Snohomish County Area, Washington (Edmonds Apartments) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/19/2019 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 6 Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0.0 0.2% 32 McKenna gravelly silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes 0.5 99.8% Totals for Area of Interest 0.5 100.0% Soil Map—Snohomish County Area, Washington Edmonds Apartments Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/19/2019 Page 3 of 3 © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet Notes Critical Areas Map Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 94.040 1:2,257 Edmonds Apartments 188.1 Creeks Seismic Hazard Areas Earth Subsidence and Landslide Area Minimum Buffer Adjacent to Hazard Wetlands Wetlands Boundary Wetland Boundaries Not Completely Delineated Wetland Known Extents Floodplains Landslide Hazard Area 40% Severe Erosion Hazard 15%-40% Erosion Hazard Areas 15%-40% Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 1B DOWNSTREAM FLOWPATH ANALYSIS 752.3 Feet Legend 1:4,514 Notes 376.17 © City of Edmonds 752.3 0 WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Downstream Flowpath THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Storm Catch Basins <all other values> Yes Storm Manholes <all other values> Yes Detention Facilities Culvert <all other values> Yes Facility Feature Creeks Storm Line <all other values> Yes Facility Lines Storm Ditch Contour Lines 10 50; 100 Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Photo #1 Looking south at site frontage Photo #2 Looking northwest, from site frontage PROJECT SITE Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Photo #3 Looking northwest, approx. 600-ft downstream of site Photo #4 Looking northwest, approx. 900-ft downstream of site Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 2 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION (Minimum Requirement #2) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report CSWPPP ANALYSIS & DESIGN This section, along with the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Plan contained in the engineering drawings, is intended to serve as the construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. The SWPPP is outlined in conformance with the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (DOE Manual). 1.0 – INTRODUCTION An introductory overview of the project has been provided in the Executive Summary of this report. 2.0 – SITE DESCRIPTION A general site description has been provided in the Executive Summary of this report. Additional detailed information is provided through the rest of this report. 3.0 – CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER BMPs 3.1 – 12 BMP ELEMENTS Element #1 – Mark Clearing Limits To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits of construction will be clearly marked before land-disturbing activities begin. Trees that are to be preserved, as well as all sensitive areas and their buffers, shall be clearly delineated, both in the field and on the plans. In general, natural vegetation and native topsoil shall be retained in an undisturbed state to the maximum extent possible. The BMPs relevant to marking the clearing limits are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate BMPs for marking clearing limits are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Element #2 – Establish Construction Access Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads, and wheel washing, street sweeping, and street cleaning shall be employed to prevent sediment from entering state waters. All wash wastewater shall be controlled on site. The specific BMPs related to establishing construction access that will be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate construction access BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Element #3 - Control Flow Rates In order to protect the properties and waterways downstream of the project site, stormwater discharges from the site will be controlled. The specific BMPs for flow control that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate flow control BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit. To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In general, discharge rates of stormwater from the site will be controlled where increases in impervious area or soil compaction during construction could lead to downstream erosion, or where necessary to meet local agency stormwater discharge requirements (e.g. discharge to combined sewer systems). Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal BMP before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged to an infiltration facility. The specific BMPs to be used for controlling sediment on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate sediment control BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs at the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In addition, sediment will be removed from paved areas in and adjacent to construction work areas manually or using mechanical sweepers, as needed, to minimize tracking of sediments on vehicle tires away from the site and to minimize wash off of sediments from adjacent streets in runoff. Whenever possible, sediment laden water shall be discharged into onsite, relatively level, vegetated areas (BMP C240 paragraph 4, Volume II page 116). In some cases, sediment discharge in concentrated runoff can be controlled using permanent stormwater BMPs (e.g., infiltration swales, ponds, trenches). Sediment loads can limit the effectiveness of some permanent stormwater BMPs, such as those used for infiltration or biofiltration; however, those BMPs designed to remove solids by settling (wet ponds or detention ponds) can be used during the construction phase. When permanent stormwater BMPs will be used to control sediment discharge during construction, the structure will be protected from excessive sedimentation with adequate erosion and sediment control BMPs. Any accumulated sediment shall be removed after construction is complete and the permanent stormwater BMP will be restabilized with vegetation per applicable design requirements once the remainder of the site has been stabilized. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Element #5 - Stabilize Soils Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Seeding will be used on disturbed areas that have reached final grade or that will remain unworked for more than thirty days. Plastic Covering will be used on the temporary stock pile areas and elsewhere on the site as needed. Dust control will be implemented as needed, to prevent it being required all roadways and driveways to be paved will receive early application of gravel base. Alternate soil stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days during the dry season (May 1 to September 30) and 2 days during the wet season (October 1 to April 30). Regardless of the time of year, all soils shall be stabilized at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on weather forecasts. In general, cut and fill slopes will be stabilized as soon as possible and soil stockpiles will be temporarily covered with plastic sheeting. All stockpiled soils shall be stabilized from erosion, protected with sediment trapping measures, and where possible, be located away from storm drain inlets, waterways, and drainage channels. Element #6 - Protect Slopes All cut and fill slopes will be designed, constructed, and protected in a manner than minimizes erosion. The specific BMPs that will be used to protect slopes for this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate slope protection BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Element #7 - Protect Drain Inlets All storm drain inlets and culverts made operable during construction shall be protected to prevent unfiltered or untreated water from entering the drainage conveyance system. However, the first priority is to keep all access roads clean of sediment and keep street wash water separate from entering storm drains until treatment can be provided. Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) will be implemented for all drainage inlets and culverts that could potentially be impacted by sediment-laden runoff on and near the project site. The inlet protection measures to be applied on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report If the primary BMP options are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D), or if no BMPs are listed above but deemed necessary during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall implement one or more of the alternative BMP inlet protection options. Element #8 - Stabilize Channels and Outlets Where site runoff is to be conveyed in channels, or discharged to a stream or some other natural drainage point, efforts will be taken to prevent downstream erosion. The specific BMPs for channel and outlet stabilization that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate channel and outlet stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, all temporary on- site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed, and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected peak 10 minute velocity of flow from a Type 1A, 10-year, 24-hour recurrence interval storm for the developed condition. Alternatively, the 10-year, 1-hour peak flow rate indicated by an approved continuous runoff simulation model, increased by a factor of 1.6, shall be used. Stabilization, including armoring material, adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes, and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems. Element #9 - Control Pollutants All pollutants, including waste materials and demolition debris, that occur onsite shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. Good housekeeping and preventative measures will be taken to ensure that the site will be kept clean, well-organized, and free of debris. Any required BMPs to be implemented to control specific sources of pollutants are identified in Appendix 2B. The contractor shall implement the following measures as much as is practicable, in order to mitigate pollutant impacts from vehicles, construction equipment, and/or petroleum product storage/dispensing: All vehicles, equipment, and petroleum product storage/dispensing areas will be inspected regularly to detect any leaks or spills, and to identify maintenance needs to prevent leaks or spills. On-site fueling tanks and petroleum product storage containers shall include secondary containment. Spill prevention measures, such as drip pans, will be used when conducting maintenance and repair of vehicles or equipment. In order to perform emergency repairs on site, temporary plastic will be placed beneath and, if raining, over the vehicle. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Contaminated surfaces shall be cleaned immediately following any discharge or spill incident. The contractor shall implement the following concrete and grout pollution control measures: Process water and slurry resulting from concrete work will be prevented from entering the waters of the State by implementing Concrete Handling measures (BMP C151). The contractor shall implement the following Solid Waste pollution control measures: Solid waste will be stored in secure, clearly marked containers. Element #10 - Control Dewatering Foundation, vault, and trench de-watering water, which shall have similar characteristics to stormwater runoff at the site, shall be discharged into a controlled conveyance system prior to discharge to a sediment trap, pond, or other specified facility. Channels must be stabilized as specified in Element #8. Clean, non-turbid de-watering water, such as well-point groundwater, can be discharged to systems tributary to state surface waters, provided the de-watering flow does not cause erosion or flooding of receiving waters. These clean waters should not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds. Highly turbid or contaminated dewatering water shall be handled separately from stormwater. Element #11 - Maintain BMPs All BMPs should be monitored and maintained regularly to ensure adequate operation. A TESC supervisor shall be identified at the beginning of the project to provide monitoring and direct the appropriate maintenance activity. As site conditions change, all BMPs shall be updated as necessary to maintain compliance with local regulations. Temporary BMPs can be removed when they are no longer needed. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after construction is completed and the site is stabilized. Element #12 - Manage the Project Erosion and sediment control BMPs for this project have been designed based on the following principles: Design the project to fit the existing topography, soils, and drainage patterns. Emphasize erosion control rather than sediment control. Minimize the extent and duration of the area exposed. Keep runoff velocities low. Retain sediment on site. Thoroughly monitor site and maintain all ESC measures. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Schedule major earthwork during the dry season. As this project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest, the project will be managed according to the following key project components: Phasing of Construction The construction project is being phased to the extent practicable in order to prevent soil erosion, and, to the maximum extent possible, the transport of sediment from the site during construction. Revegetation of exposed areas and maintenance of that vegetation shall be an integral part of the clearing activities during each phase of construction, per the Scheduling BMP (C 162). Seasonal Work Limitations From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of the local permitting authority that silt- laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the site through a combination of the following: o Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to receiving waters; and o Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and o Proposed erosion and sediment control measures. Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the local permitting authority may expand or restrict the seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing and grading limitations: o Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs; o Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil; and o Activities where there is 100 percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities. Coordination with Utilities and Other Jurisdictions Care has been taken to coordinate with utilities, other construction projects, and the local jurisdiction in preparing this SWPPP and scheduling the construction work. Inspection and Monitoring All BMPs shall be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Site inspections shall be conducted by a person who is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. This person has the necessary skills to: o Assess the site conditions and construction activities that could impact the quality of stormwater, and o Assess the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the quality of stormwater discharges. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report A Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall be on-site or on-call at all times. Whenever inspection and/or monitoring reveals that the BMPs identified in this SWPPP are inadequate, due to the actual discharge of or potential to discharge a significant amount of any pollutant, appropriate BMPs or design changes shall be implemented as soon as possible. Maintaining an Updated Construction SWPPP This SWPPP shall be retained on-site or within reasonable access to the site. The SWPPP shall be modified whenever there is a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has, or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. The SWPPP shall be modified if, during inspections or investigations conducted by the owner/operator, or the applicable local or state regulatory authority, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site. The SWPPP shall be modified as necessary to include additional or modified BMPs designed to correct problems identified. Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within seven (7) days following the inspection. 3.2 – SITE SPECIFIC BMPs Site specific BMPs are shown on the TESC plan sheet(s) in Appendix 2A. 4.0 – CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND BMP IMPLEMENTATION The BMP implementation schedule will be driven by the construction schedule. The list below provides an estimate of the anticipated construction schedule. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, the dry season is considered to be from May 1 to September 30, and the wet season is considered to be from October 1 to April 30. 5.0 – POLLUTION PREVENTION TEAM 5.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The pollution prevention team consists of personnel responsible for implementation of the SWPPP, including the following: Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) – primary contractor contact, responsible for site inspections (BMPs, visual monitoring, sampling, etc.); to be called upon in case of failure of any ESC measures. Resident Engineer – For projects with engineered structures only (sediment ponds/traps, sand filters, etc.): Site representative for the owner that is the project’s supervising engineer responsible for inspections and issuing instructions and drawings to the contractor’s site supervisor or representative. Emergency Ecology Contact – Individual to be contacted at Ecology in case of emergency. Emergency Owner Contact – Individual that is the site owner or representative of the site owner to be contacted in the case of an emergency. Non-Emergency Ecology Contact – Individual that is the site owner or representative of the site owner that can be contacted if required. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Monitoring Personnel – Personnel responsible for conducting water quality monitoring; for most sites this person is also the CESCL. 5.2 TEAM MEMBERS Names and contact information for those identified as members of the pollution prevention team are provided in the project summary in Appendix 2B. 6.0 – SITE INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING Monitoring includes visual inspection, monitoring for water quality parameters of concern, and documentation of the inspection and monitoring findings in a site log book. A site log book will be maintained for all on-site construction activities and will include: A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other permit requirements; Site inspections; and, Stormwater quality monitoring. For convenience, the inspection forma and water quality monitoring forms included in Appendix 2E of this report include the required information for the site log book. This SWPPP may function as the site log book, if desired, or the forms may be separated and included in a separate site log book. However, if separated, the site log book must be maintained on-site or within reasonable access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. 6.1 SITE INSPECTION All BMPs will be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. The inspector will be a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) per BMP C160. The name and contact information for the CESCL is provided in Section 5 of this SWPPP. Site inspection will occur in all areas disturbed by construction activities and at all stormwater discharge points. Stormwater will be examined for the presence of suspended sediment, turbidity, discoloration, and oily sheen. The site inspector will evaluate and document the effectiveness of the installed BMPs and determine if it is necessary to repair or replace any of the BMPs to improve the quality of stormwater discharges. All maintenance and repairs will be documented in the site log book or forms provided in this document. All new BMPs or design changes will be documented in the SWPPP as soon as possible. 6.1.1 Site Inspection Frequency Site inspections will be conducted at least once a week and within 24 hours following any rainfall event which causes a discharge of stormwater from the site. For sites with temporary stabilization measures, the site inspection frequency can be reduced to once every month. 6.1.2 Site Inspection Documentation The site inspector will record each site inspection using the site log inspection forms provided in Appendix 2E. The site inspection log forms may be separated from this SWPPP document, but will be maintained on-site or within reasonable access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report 6.2 Stormwater Quality Monitoring 6.2.1 Turbidity Sampling Monitoring requirements for the proposed project will include turbidity sampling to monitor site discharges for water quality compliance with the 2010 Snohomish County Drainage manual and Snohomish County Code Title 30.63A NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix 2D). Sampling will be conducted at all site discharge points at least once per calendar week. Turbidity monitoring will follow the analytical methodologies described in Section S4 of the 2005 Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix 2D). The key benchmark values that require action include 25 NTU and 250 NTU for turbidity. If the 25 NTU benchmark for turbidity is exceeded, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Ensure all BMPs specified in this SWPPP are installed and functioning as intended. 2. Assess whether additional BMPs should be implemented and make revisions to the SWPPP as necessary. 3. Sample the discharge location daily until the analysis results are less than 25 NTU (turbidity) or 32 cm (transparency). If the turbidity is greater than 25 NTU but less than 250 NTU for more than 3 days, additional treatment BMPs will be implemented within 24 hours of the third consecutive sample that exceeded the benchmark value. Additional treatment BMPs will include, but are not limited to, off-site treatment, infiltration, filtration and chemical treatment. If the 250 NTU benchmark for turbidity is exceeded at any time, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Notify Ecology by phone within 24 hours of analysis. 2. Continue daily sampling until the turbidity is less than 25 NTU. 3. Initiate additional treatment BMPs such as off-site treatment, infiltration, filtration and chemical treatment within 24 hours of the first 250 NTU exceedance. 4. Implement additional treatment BMPs as soon as possible, but within 7 days of the first 250 NTU exceedance. 5. Describe inspection results and remedial actions that are taken in the site log book and in monthly discharge monitoring reports. 6.2.2 pH Sampling Stormwater runoff will be monitored for pH starting on the first day of any activity that includes more than 40 yards of poured or recycled concrete, or after the application of “Engineered Soils” such as, Portland cement treated base, cement kiln dust, or fly ash. This does not include fertilizers. For concrete work, pH monitoring will start the first day concrete is poured and continue until 3 weeks after the last pour. For engineered soils, the pH monitoring period begins when engineered soils are first exposed to precipitation and continue until the area is fully stabilized. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Stormwater samples will be collected daily from all points of discharge from the site and measured for pH using a calibrated pH meter, pH test kit, or wide range pH indicator paper. If the measured pH is 8.5 or greater, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Prevent the high pH water from entering storm drains or surface water. 2. Adjust or neutralize the high pH water if necessary using appropriate technology such as CO2 sparging (liquid or dry ice). 3. Contact Ecology if chemical treatment other than CO2 sparging is planned. 7.0 – REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING 7.1 RECORDKEEPING 7.1.1 Site Log Book A site log book will be maintained for all on-site construction activities and will include: A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other permit requirements; Site inspections; and, Stormwater quality monitoring. For convenience, the inspection form and water quality monitoring forms included in Appendix 2E of this report include the required information for the site log book. 7.1.2 Records Retention Records of all monitoring information (site log book, inspection reports/checklists, etc.), this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and any other documentation of compliance with permit requirements will be retained during the life of the construction project and for a minimum of three years following the termination of permit coverage in accordance with permit condition S5.C. 7.1.3 Access to Plans and Records The SWPPP, General Permit, Notice of Authorization letter, and Site Log Book will be retained on site or within reasonable access to the site and will be made immediately available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. A copy of this SWPPP will be provided to Ecology within 14 days of receipt of a written request for the SWPPP from Ecology. Any other information requested by Ecology will be submitted within a reasonable time. A copy of the SWPPP or access to the SWPPP will be provided to the public when requested in writing in accordance with permit condition S5.G. 7.1.4 Updating the SWPPP In accordance with Conditions S3, S4.B, and S9.B.3 of the General Permit, this SWPPP will be modified if the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site or there has been a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the site that has a significant effect on the discharge, or potential for discharge, of pollutants to the waters of the State. The SWPPP will be modified within seven days of determination based on inspection(s) that Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report additional or modified BMPs are necessary to correct problems identified, and an updated timeline for BMP implementation will be prepared. 7.2 REPORTING 7.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms will not be submitted to Ecology because water quality sampling is not being conducted at the site. 7.2.2 Notification of Noncompliance If any of the terms and conditions of the permit are not met, and it causes a threat to human health of the environment, the following steps will be taken in accordance with permit section S5.F: 1. Ecology will be immediately notified of the failure to comply. 2. Immediate action will be taken to control the noncompliance issue and to correct the problem. If applicable, sampling and analysis of any noncompliance will be repeated immediately and the results submitted to Ecology within five (5) days of becoming aware of the violation. 3. A detailed written report describing the noncompliance will be submitted to Ecology within five (5) days, unless requested earlier by Ecology. In accordance with permit condition S2.A, a complete application form will be submitted to Ecology and the appropriate local jurisdiction (if applicable) to be covered by the General Permit. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 2A SITE PLAN WITH BMP MEASURES Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 2B SWPPP PROJECT SUMMARY Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS: Title Name(s) Phone Number Certified Erosion & Sediment Control Lead Resident Engineer Bill Helsley (425) 486-6533 Emergency Ecology Contact Puget Sound Office (425) 649-7000 Emergency Owner Contact Non-Emergency Ecology Contact Northwest Region (425) 649-7000 Monitoring Personnel ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: Construction Start Date June 2019 Install ESC Measures June 2014 Construction End Date Sept 2020 CONSTRUCTION BMP LIST: High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) Plastic Covering (BMP C123) Topsoiling (BMP C125) Dust Control (BMP C140) Materials on Hand (BMP C150) Interceptor Dike and Swale (BMP C200) Check Dams (BMP C207) Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) Silt Fence (BMP C233) Straw Wattles (BMP C235) Detention Pond Or Vault Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 2C ALTERNATIVE BMPs Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report The following includes a list of possible alternative BMPs for each of the 12 elements not described in the main SWPPP text. This list can be referenced in the event a BMP for a specific element is not functioning as designed and an alternative BMP needs to be implemented. Element #1 - Mark Clearing Limits High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) Element #2 - Establish Construction Access Wheel Wash (BMP C106) Element #3 - Control Flow Rates (none) Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls Straw Bale Barrier (BMP C230) Vegetated Strip (BMP C234) Materials on Hand (BMP C150) Element #5 - Stabilize Soils Dust Control (BMP C140) Topsoiling (BMP C125) Sodding (BMP C124) Element #6 - Protect Slopes Straw Wattles (BMP C235) Grass-Lined Channels (BMP C201) Element #7 - Protect Drain Inlets (none) Element #8 - Stabilize Channels and Outlets Level Spreader (BMP C206) Element #10 - Control Dewatering (none) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 2D GENERAL PERMIT Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Construction Stormwater General Permit The project proposes a disturbance less than 1-acre, so a DOE Construction Stormwater General Permit is not required. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 2E SITE LOG & INSPECTION FORMS Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Site Inspection Forms (and Site Log) The results of each inspection shall be summarized in an inspection report or checklist that is entered into or attached to the site log book. It is suggested that the inspection report or checklist be included in this appendix to keep monitoring and inspection information in one document, but this is optional. However, it is mandatory that this SWPPP and the site inspection forms be kept onsite at all times during construction, and that inspections be performed and documented as outlined below. At a minimum, each inspection report or checklist shall include: a. Inspection date/times b. Weather information: general conditions during inspection, approximate amount of precipitation since the last inspection, and approximate amount of precipitation within the last 24 hours. c. A summary or list of all BMPs that have been implemented, including observations of all erosion/sediment control structures or practices. d. The following shall be noted: i. Locations of BMPs inspected, ii. Locations of BMPs that need maintenance, iii. The reason maintenance is needed iv. Locations of BMPs that failed to operate as designed or intended, and v. Locations where additional or different BMPs are needed, and the reason(s) why. e. A description of stormwater discharged from the site. The presence of suspended sediment, turbid water, discoloration, and/or oil sheen shall be noted, as applicable. f. A description of any water quality monitoring performed during inspection, and the results of that monitoring. g. General comments and notes, including a brief description of any BMP r repairs, maintenance or installations made as a result of the inspection. h. A statement that, in the judgment of the person conducting the site inspection, the site is either in compliance or out of compliance with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and the NPDES permit. If the site inspection indicates that the site is out of compliance, the inspection report shall include a summary of the remedial actions required to bring the site back into compliance, as well as a schedule of implementation. i. Name, title, and signature of person conducting the site inspection; and the following statement: “I certify under penalty of law that this report is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief”. When the site inspection indicates that the site is not in compliance with any terms and conditions of the NPDES permit, the Permittee shall take immediate action(s) to: stop, contain, and clean up the unauthorized discharges, or otherwise stop the noncompliance; correct the problem(s); implement appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs), and/or conduct maintenance of existing BMPs; and achieve compliance with all applicable standards and permit conditions. In addition, if the noncompliance causes a threat to human health or the environment, the Permittee shall comply with the Noncompliance Notification requirements in Special Condition S5.F of the permit. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Site Inspection Form General Information Project Name: Inspector Name: Title: CESCL # : Date: Time: Inspection Type: □ After a rain event □ Weekly □ Turbidity/transparency benchmark exceedance □ Other Weather Precipitation Since last inspection In last 24 hours Description of General Site Conditions: Inspection of BMPs Element 1: Mark Clearing Limits BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 2: Establish Construction Access BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Element 3: Control Flowrates BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 4: Install Sediment Controls BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 5: Stabilize Soils BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Element 6: Protect Slopes BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Element 9: Control Pollutants BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Element 10: Control Dewatering BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Stormwater Discharges From the Site Observed? Problem/Corrective Action Y N Location Turbidity Discoloration Sheen Location Turbidity Discoloration Sheen Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Water Quality Monitoring Was any water quality monitoring conducted? □Yes □No If water quality monitoring was conducted, record results here: If water quality monitoring indicated turbidity 250 NTU or greater; or transparency 6 cm or less, was Ecology notified by phone within 24 hrs? □Yes □No If Ecology was notified, indicate the date, time, contact name and phone number below: Date: Time: Contact Name: Phone #: General Comments and Notes Include BMP repairs, maintenance, or installations made as a result of the inspection. Were Photos Taken? □Yes □No If photos taken, describe photos below: Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 3 SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLUTION (Minimum Requirement #3) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Source Control of Pollution The project is not classified as a high-use site, and no hazardous materials requiring source control BMPs are proposed to be stored on-site. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 4 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS (Minimum Requirement #4) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS The project lies at a relative high point, and generally discharges runoff to the north and northwest. All runoff from the site can be expected to follow this topography and discharge runoff to Edmonds Way, along the northern edge of the site. The project proposal will collect on-site runoff, provide detention & treatment, then discharge to the public storm drainage system within Edmonds Way. The downstream flowpath beyond this point will be the same as it was prior to development. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 5 ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (Minimum Requirement #5) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Performance Standards The project is required to provide stormwater management techniques consistent with Chapter 18.30 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). This code generally adopts the 2014 Edition of the WA Dept. of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, with an addendum issued by the City dated 12/21/2016. These two documents will be referred to throughout this report as “DOE Manual” and “City Addendum”, respectively. For Minimum Requirement #5, the City Addendum refers to Section 18.30.060.D.5 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). This section of the ECDC identifies the project as a Category 2 project, since it will discharge to the public storm drainage system. As such, it is required to satisfy all nine minimum drainage requirements. It must also evaluate the feasibility of several low-impact stormwater management features, and implement them to the greatest practical extent. The required feasibility evaluation is provided below: Surface On-site BMP (Manual Reference) Feasibility Analysis Lawn & Landscape Post-Construction Soil Quality & Depth (BMP T5.13) FEASIBLE - This BMP will be utilized by retaining the duff layer in an undisturbed state where no grading is needed. In areas where grading is expected to occur, the existing topsoil shall be removed and stockpiled in a designated location, and reapplied to other portions of the site upon reaching the finished grade. Roofs & Other Hard Surfaces Full Dispersion (BMP T5.30) - or - Downspout Full Infiltration (BMP T5.10A) (BMP T5.30) NOT FEASIBLE – This BMP requires 65% of the site to be protected in a native (forested) condition. This project site was previously cleared of native vegetation, and 65% of the site is not available to be set aside for dispersion. – or – (BMP T5.10A) NOT FEASIBLE – The portions of the site scheduled for development are underlain by a dense till soil unit which is not expected to support infiltration. Bioretention (Vol. V, Ch. 7) NOT FEASIBLE – The underlying soil in the development area is identified as a till soil unit which is not likely to support infiltration. With this in mind, the facility would require an underdrain to collect and convey runoff. The bioretention soil media allows percolation of runoff to the underdrain at a rate which does not provide any meaningful flow control benefit. Downspout Dispersion (BMP T5.10B) NOT FEASIBLE – The required dispersion flowpath lengths are not available at the project site. Perforated Stub-out (BMP T5.10C) FEASIBLE – Perforated stub-out connections will be provided for all of the proposed lots. Detention Vaults/Pipes FEASIBLE – A detailed stormwater detention design is discussed in Section 7 of this report. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Existing Site Hydrology The project site occupies a single drainage basin which flows to the north and northwest toward Edmonds Way. For hydrologic modeling purposes, the existing site conditions are assumed to be fully forested, to mimic the historic conditions that existed prior to any previous development of the site. A map depicting the existing site hydrology is provided in Appendix 5A. Developed Site Hydrology The proposed development activity will involve site grading to accommodate the proposed apartment building, and associated driveways, parking areas, hardscape and landscape features. Surface runoff from the site will be collected via roof drains and catch basins, and will be routed to an underground stormwater detention facility. That facility will ultimately discharge to the public storm drainage system within Edmonds Way. A map depicting the developed site conditions is provided in Appendix 5A. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 5A BASIN MAPPING DateProject No.DrawnDesignSheet:NKJNKJ2/13/19410-002-18PREDEVELOPED BASIN MAPEDMONDS APARTMENTS2NEXISTING BASIN DateProject No.DrawnDesignSheet:NKJNKJ2/13/19410-002-18DEVELOPED BASIN MAPEDMONDS APARTMENTS3NPROJECT BASIN Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 6 RUNOFF TREATMENT (Minimum Requirement #6) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report RUNOFF TREATMENT Surface runoff from the site will be collected and routed to an underground stormwater detention vault. The lower portion of this vault will contain a wetpool storage component intended to provide basic treatment, as prescribed by the DOE Manual. The primary goal of basic treatment is to remove sediment, and the wetpool storage acts as a plug-flow vessel, which provides sufficient residence time to promote settlement of suspended sediment prior to discharge. Wetpool sizing calculations are included in the flow control calculations, provided in Appendix 7A of this report. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 7 FLOW CONTROL (Minimum Requirement #7) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report FLOW CONTROL Surface runoff from the site will be collected and routed to an underground stormwater detention vault. The lower portion of this vault will contain a wetpool storage component, and the remainder of the vault will be utilized for stormwater detention. Prior to discharge from the underground vault, water will pass through a multiple-orifice flow-control riser, which is intended to release flows at rates and durations that approximately mimic those that existed historically. Stormwater detention pond and control riser design has been performed using MGS-Flood hydrologic modeling software. This software utilizes a locally-calibrated continuous runoff simulation, and is approved by the WA Dept. of Ecology for the design of stormwater management facilities. Flow control design calculations are provided in Appendix 7A of this report. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report APPENDIX 7A FLOW CONTROL DESIGN CALCULATIONS Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Existing Basin Conditions Developed Basin Conditions Existing Basin Developed Basin Detention Vaul Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Detention Facility Design ————————————————————————————————— MGS FLOOD PROJECT REPORT Program Version: MGSFlood 4.46 Program License Number: 201110001 Project Simulation Performed on: 02/20/2019 3:08 PM Report Generation Date: 02/20/2019 3:09 PM ————————————————————————————————— Input File Name: 2019-02-13 Detention Vault Sizing.fld Project Name: Edmonds Apts Analysis Title: Detention Vault Sizing Comments: ———————————————— PRECIPITATION INPUT ———————————————— Computational Time Step (Minutes): 15 Extended Precipitation Time Series Selected Climatic Region Number: 15 Full Period of Record Available used for Routing Precipitation Station : 96004005 Puget East 40 in_5min 10/01/1939-10/01/2097 Evaporation Station : 961040 Puget East 40 in MAP Evaporation Scale Factor : 0.750 HSPF Parameter Region Number: 1 HSPF Parameter Region Name : USGS Default ********** Default HSPF Parameters Used (Not Modified by User) *************** ********************** WATERSHED DEFINITION *********************** Predevelopment/Post Development Tributary Area Summary Predeveloped Post Developed Total Subbasin Area (acres) 0.450 0.450 Area of Links that Include Precip/Evap (acres) 0.000 0.000 Total (acres) 0.450 0.450 ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ---------- Subbasin : Existing Basin ---------- -------Area (Acres) -------- Till Forest 0.450 ---------------------------------------------- Subbasin Total 0.450 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ---------- Subbasin : Developed Basin ---------- -------Area (Acres) -------- Till Grass 0.160 Impervious 0.290 ---------------------------------------------- Subbasin Total 0.450 Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report ************************* LINK DATA ******************************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ************************* LINK DATA ******************************* ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 1 ------------------------------------------ Link Name: Detention Vault Link Type: Structure Downstream Link: None Prismatic Pond Option Used Pond Floor Elevation (ft) : 390.00 Riser Crest Elevation (ft) : 393.50 Max Pond Elevation (ft) : 394.00 Storage Depth (ft) : 3.50 Pond Bottom Length (ft) : 92.0 Pond Bottom Width (ft) : 24.0 Pond Side Slopes (ft/ft) : L1= 0.00 L2= 0.00 W1= 0.00 W2= 0.00 Bottom Area (sq-ft) : 2208. Area at Riser Crest El (sq-ft) : 2,208. (acres) : 0.051 Volume at Riser Crest (cu-ft) : 7,728. (ac-ft) : 0.177 Area at Max Elevation (sq-ft) : 2208. (acres) : 0.051 Vol at Max Elevation (cu-ft) : 8,832. (ac-ft) : 0.203 Massmann Infiltration Option Used Hydraulic Conductivity (in/hr) : 0.00 Depth to Water Table (ft) : 100.00 Bio-Fouling Potential : Low Maintenance : Average or Better Riser Geometry Riser Structure Type : Circular Riser Diameter (in) : 12.00 Common Length (ft) : 0.000 Riser Crest Elevation : 393.50 ft Hydraulic Structure Geometry Number of Devices: 2 ---Device Number 1 --- Device Type : Circular Orifice Control Elevation (ft) : 390.00 Diameter (in) : 0.34 Orientation : Horizontal Elbow : No Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report ---Device Number 2 --- Device Type : Circular Orifice Control Elevation (ft) : 392.50 Diameter (in) : 0.75 Orientation : Horizontal Elbow : Yes **********************FLOOD FREQUENCY AND DURATION STATISTICS******************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 0 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 1 ***********Groundwater Recharge Summary ************* Recharge is computed as input to Perlnd Groundwater Plus Infiltration in Structures Total Predeveloped Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subbasin: Existing Basin 77.593 _____________________________________ Total: 77.593 Total Post Developed Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subbasin: Developed Basin 19.554 Link: Detention Vault 0.000 _____________________________________ Total: 19.554 Total Predevelopment Recharge is Greater than Post Developed Average Recharge Per Year, (Number of Years= 158) Predeveloped: 0.491 ac-ft/year, Post Developed: 0.124 ac-ft/year ***********Water Quality Facility Data ************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 1 ********** Link: Detention Vault ********** Basic Wet Pond Volume (91% Exceedance): 1450. cu-ft Computed Large Wet Pond Volume, 1.5*Basic Volume: 2175. cu-ft Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report Infiltration/Filtration Statistics-------------------- Inflow Volume (ac-ft): 162.20 Inflow Volume Including PPT-Evap (ac-ft): 162.20 Total Runoff Infiltrated (ac-ft): 0.00, 0.00% Total Runoff Filtered (ac-ft): 0.00, 0.00% Primary Outflow To Downstream System (ac-ft): 162.17 Secondary Outflow To Downstream System (ac-ft): 0.00 Percent Treated (Infiltrated+Filtered)/Total Volume: 0.00% ***********Compliance Point Results ************* Scenario Predeveloped Compliance Subbasin: Existing Basin Scenario Postdeveloped Compliance Link: Detention Vault *** Point of Compliance Flow Frequency Data *** Recurrence Interval Computed Using Gringorten Plotting Position Predevelopment Runoff Postdevelopment Runoff Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-Year 9.589E-03 2-Year 4.365E-03 5-Year 1.563E-02 5-Year 9.563E-03 10-Year 2.106E-02 10-Year 1.479E-02 25-Year 2.670E-02 25-Year 1.695E-02 50-Year 3.407E-02 50-Year 1.838E-02 100-Year 3.692E-02 100-Year 1.938E-02 200-Year 5.747E-02 200-Year 1.974E-02 ** Record too Short to Compute Peak Discharge for These Recurrence Intervals Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 8 WETLANDS PROTECTION (Minimum Requirement #8) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report WETLANDS PROTECTION There are no wetlands identified on-site, or within the downstream flowpath, so this requirement is not applicable. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report SECTION 9 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE (Minimum Requirement #9) Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Stormwater facilities and BMPs shall be inspected, operated and maintained in accordance with Sections 18.30.060.D.9 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The following is a selection of operations/maintenance recommendations specific to the site, obtained from the current DOE Manual. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report No. 3 – Closed Detention Systems (Tanks/Vaults) Maintenance Component Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a vent is blocked at any point or the vent is damaged. Vents open and functioning. Debris and Sediment Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% of the diameter of the storage area for 1/2 length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. (Example: 72-inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than 1/2 length of tank.) All sediment and debris removed from storage area. Joints Between Tank/Pipe Section Any openings or voids allowing material to be transported into facility. (Will require engineering analysis to determine structural stability). All joint between tank/pipe sections are sealed. Tank Pipe Bent Out of Shape Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape more than 10% of its design shape. (Review required by engineer to determine structural stability). Tank/pipe repaired or replaced to design. Vault Structure Includes Cracks in Wall, Bottom, Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Cracks wider than 1/2-inch and any evidence of soil particles entering the structure through the cracks, or maintenance/inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2-inch at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering the vault through the walls. Vault replaced or repaired to design specifications and is structurally sound. No cracks more than 1/4-inch wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Manhole Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open manhole requires maintenance. Manhole is closed. Locking Mechanism Not Working Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread (may not apply to self-locking lids). Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover Difficult to Remove One maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying normal lifting pressure. Intent is to keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Cover can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, not securely attached to structure wall, rust, or cracks. Ladder meets design standards. Allows maintenance person safe access. Catch Basins See “Catch Basins” (No. 5) See “Catch Basins” (No. 5). See “Catch Basins” (No. 5). Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report No. 4 – Control Structure/Flow Restrictor Maintenance Component Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Debris (Includes Sediment) Material exceeds 25% of sump depth or 1 foot below orifice plate. Control structure orifice is not blocked. All trash and debris removed. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to manhole wall. Structure securely attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Structure in correct position. Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and show signs of rust. Connections to outlet pipe are water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes--other than designed holes--in the structure. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Gate moves up and down easily and is watertight. Chain/rod leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Plate is in place and works as designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Plate is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. Pipe is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Manhole See “Closed Detention Systems” (No. 3). See “Closed Detention Systems” (No. 3). See “Closed Detention Systems” (No. 3). Catch Basin See “Catch Basins” (No. 5). See “Catch Basins” (No. 5). See “Catch Basins” (No. 5). Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report No. 5 – Catch Basins Maintenance Component Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is performed General Trash & Debris Trash or debris which is located immediately in front of the catch basin opening or is blocking inletting capacity of the basin by more than 10%. No Trash or debris located immediately in front of catch basin or on grate opening. Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 60 percent of the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of six inches clearance from the debris surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). No dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. Sediment Sediment (in the basin) that exceeds 60 percent of the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of 6 inches clearance from the sediment surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. No sediment in the catch basin Structure Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (Intent is to make sure no material is running into basin). Top slab is free of holes and cracks. Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Frame not securely attached Frame is sitting flush on the riser rings or top slab and firmly attached. Fractures or Cracks in Basin Walls/ Bottom Maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. Grout fillet has separated or cracked wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Pipe is regrouted and secure at basin wall. Settlement/ Misalignment If failure of basin has created a safety, function, or design problem. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. No vegetation blocking opening to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. No vegetation or root growth present. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report No. 5 – Catch Basins Maintenance Component Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is performed Contamination and Pollution See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). No pollution present. Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Catch basin cover is closed Locking Mechanism Not Working Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover Difficult to Remove One maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying normal lifting pressure. (Intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance.) Cover can be removed by one maintenance person. Ladder Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, not securely attached to basin wall, misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. Metal Grates (If Applicable) Grate opening Unsafe Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate opening meets design standards. Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of grate surface inletting capacity. Grate free of trash and debris. Damaged or Missing. Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design standards. Edmonds Apartments Drainage Report No. 12 – Wetvaults Maintenance Component Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed General Trash/Debris Accumulation Trash and debris accumulated in vault, pipe or inlet/outlet (includes floatables and non- floatables). Remove trash and debris from vault. Sediment Accumulation in Vault Sediment accumulation in vault bottom exceeds the depth of the sediment zone plus 6-inches. Remove sediment from vault. Damaged Pipes Inlet/outlet piping damaged or broken and in need of repair. Pipe repaired and/or replaced. Access Cover Damaged/Not Working Cover cannot be opened or removed, especially by one person. Pipe repaired or replaced to proper working specifications. Ventilation Ventilation area blocked or plugged. Blocking material removed or cleared from ventilation area. A specified % of the vault surface area must provide ventilation to the vault interior (see design specifications). Vault Structure Damage - Includes Cracks in Walls Bottom, Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Maintenance/inspection personnel determine that the vault is not structurally sound. Vault replaced or repairs made so that vault meets design specifications and is structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2-inch at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or evidence of soil particles entering through the cracks. Vault repaired so that no cracks exist wider than 1/4-inch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Baffles Baffles corroding, cracking, warping and/or showing signs of failure as determined by maintenance/inspection staff. Baffles repaired or replaced to specifications. Access Ladder Damage Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, not functioning properly, not attached to structure wall, missing rungs, has cracks and/or misaligned. Confined space warning sign missing. Ladder replaced or repaired to specifications, and is safe to use as determined by inspection personnel. Replace sign warning of confined space entry requirements. Ladder and entry notification complies with OSHA standards. fED#P7lCITY OF EDMONDSRECEIVEDr:: 1 3 20,!8FìËVFt0qMËNT SËRV|CË$TOUNTERsr. 1ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI STPurpose of Checklist:The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmentalimpacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals withprobable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to helpyou and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, ifit can be done) and tohelp the agency decide whether an EIS is required.Instructions for Applícants :This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use thischecklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answerthe questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answerthe questions from your own obseryations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or ifa question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now mayavoid unnecessary delays later.Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoring, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions ifyou can. Ifyou have problems, the governmental agencies can assistyou.The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyour proposal, even ifyou plan to do them over a period oftime or on different parcels ofland. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which yousubmit this checklist may ask you to explain your ans\ryers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if theremay be significant adverse impact.U s e of chec klist fot nonpr oj ect pr opos als :For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency mayexclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis ofthe proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should beread as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.A. BACKGROUND1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:Edmonds Crossins AnartmentsName of applicant:Haynes Lund2.3.Address and phone number ofapplicant and contact person385 101't Avenue SEBellevue, WA 980044. Date checklist prepared:26 NOV 20185. Agency requesting checklist: City of EdmondsRevised on 9/16/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 1 of 28ATTACHMENT 6 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicableWe propose to beein construction in sprine/summer of 2019 assoon as buildinp oermit iissu ed.7Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with thisproposal? If yes, explain.There are no plans for anv future expansion of this proiect on this site.List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly relatedto this proposal.A Soils Report will be prepared bv a licensed eeotechnical ensineer.(STAFF COMMENTS)A$n^,uú^{e-fDo you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affectingthe property covered by your proposal? Ifyes, explain.We are not aware of anv such applications or orooosals.8.9-Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 2 of 28 10.List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.Design Review Board approval; Demolition permit; Buildine perm¡t (and associated construct¡on perm¡ts, plumbine.such as electrical. sorinklersl: oossible Street Use oermit-(STAFF C&t-rn,¿r € Wa.$f â,'g{-n--t--,11Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects ofyour proposal. Youdo not need to repeat those answers on this page.Demolish existing residences on the site (5 units) and construct a new 3-storv 10-unit aþartment buildins withassociated narkins12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of yourproposed project, including a street address, if anyn and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposalwould occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legat description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic mapn if reasonably available. \ühile you should submit any plans required by theagency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications relatedto this checklist.Site address: 23820 Edmonds WavParcel No. 00463301000302(STAFFRevised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 3 of 28 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANTB. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS1. Eartha.b.General description of the sÍte (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:Site slopes generallv uo from the street frontase toward the southeast. with a bit of ã hill in the centerWhat is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?There is a small area located in the center of the proiect that is at a sloþe of 80%. but there is onlv a four footgrade difference at this location. The site generallv has a erade of approximatelv 10%.c.(STAFF Cl¡ o*atn</û(^al-dr-ß niìi .'./ì ôç ¿ì^ É--rìÊì on halVhat general types of soils are found on the site (for examplen clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If youknow the classification of agricultural soilso specify them and note any agricultural land of long termcommercial signilicance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.At the lower end of the site there is sranular fill over hardoan. At the uooer end of thesite there is sisnificantloose fill¡oil overlr/ing loose fine to medium sand with trace to some silt and s!'arrels.(STAFF COd.Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.None that we are aware of.Revised on 9/19/16EdXínq-SEPA.docPage 4 of 28 e.Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling,excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source offill.There is approximatelv 2,000 cubic vards of cut and 500 cubic vards of fill orooosed forthe proiect. The areawhereeradingisproposedtotakeplaceisapproximatelv0.46acresinsize.whichisthemaioritvofthesite. Thefill material r4rill consisit primarilV of structural backfill, and crushed rock as a base for the proposed pavementssections.f. Could erosion occur as a result ofclearingo construction, or use? Ifso, generally describe.Erosion could occur as a result of clearine of the site for the orooosed buildinp and oarkine lot, but standarderosion and sediment Eontrol best management practices will be implemented durine the construction of theproject. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) will be prepared for the oroiect which will outlinespecific erosion and sediment control measures to be installed and insoected on abasis.cAbout what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (forexample, asphalt or buildings)?Approximately 75% of lhe site will be covered bv impervious surfaces.h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, ifany:Standard erosion and control meesures will he imnlemented drrrinE conçtrrrrtion. A site soecific stormwateroollution orevention nlan ISWPPPì will alcnbenrpnaredfor thenrôiê.tRevised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 5 of 28 2. AIRb.c.â.What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, andindustrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describeand give approximate quantities if known.There will be dust and vehicle fumes durins the construction of the oroiect. There should be no sipnificant airimpacts after construction, other than vehicles driven bv the occupants.Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.None that we are aware of.Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to theo if any:None are required.3. WATERa. Surface:(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round andseasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. Ifappropriateo state what stream or river it flows into.No(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Ifyeso please describe and attach available plans.Revised on 9/1-9/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 6 of 28 (3) Estimate the amount of fïll and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surfacewater or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fillmaterial.No fill material will be placed in or removed from wetlands.(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known.No surface water withdrawals or diversions are heins nronoced aç nart of th is(STAFF COMMENTS)(STAFF COMMENTS)(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe thetype of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.No.(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.No.(STAFF COMMENTS)(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 7 of 28 b. Ground(1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a weII for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give ageneral description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the wellWill water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximatequantities if known.(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, ifany (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to beserved (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.Site is served bv a sewer svstem. No waste material will be discharsed into the eround.c. Water Runoff (including storm water):(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposat, if any(include quantities, if known). lVhere will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If^^ l^^---:L^su, uËsgl Ius.Stormwater from the proiect will be generated bv the proposed new buildines and associated parkine lotas well as from minor miscellaneous landscaped areas around the buildines. This stormwater will becollected and conveved via a series of catch basins and pipes to an underground detention and waterqualitv vault desien to release storm water at predeveloped flow rates. This vault will outlet to theRevised on 9/19/16ÊdXing-SEPA.docPage I of 28 (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.No(3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so,describe.The proposed drainaFe svstem does not alter affect drainaRe patterns in the vicinitv of the site.Stormwater will be released at the same discharse location as the oredevelooed conditions-(STAFF COMMENTS)(STAFF COMMENTS)d.Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, ifany:lnstallation of a stormwater convevance and detention svstem in accordance with Citv of Edmonds standards.(STAFFRevised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 9 of 28 4. Plantsa.Check or circle types ofvegetation found on the site:xdeciduoustree:alder,maple,aspen'other:X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:X shrubspâsturecrop or gralnxOrchards, vineyards or other permanent cropswet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:water plants: water lilyn eelgrass, milfoil, other:other types of vegetationWhat kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?Most of the existinq trees (about l0 total) 4nd sfuuþbqrv on the site will be removed. Entire site will be re-gradedand new landscaoins will be installed,b.c.List threatened or endangered species known to be on or neâr the site.aware of.Revised on 9/1-9/16(STAFF COMMENTEdXing-SEPA.docPoge 10 of 28 d.Proposed landscaping, use ofnative plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any:The landscape plan will utilize all native or naturalized olants. Landscaoe will fit inthe character of theneiphborhood.e.List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.None that we are aware of.(STAFF COMMENT5. Animalsa.List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or nearthe site. Examples include:birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds,other: None reportedmammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver,other: No s¡sht¡nes have been reportedfish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:Not Aoolicable(STAFF COMMENTS)Revísed on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 77 of 28 b.List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.This project will have no impact on threatened or endangered species.c.Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.This proiect will have no impact on anv animal migration route.d.Proposed measur€s to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:No measures to preserve or enhance wildlife are proposed.(STAFF COMMENTS)e.List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.No invasive animal species are known to be on or near the site.(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 12 of 28 6. Energy and Natural Resourcesa.What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completedprojectrs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.Electricitv from the oower srid will be used to heat the dwellinp unitctonrovídehot water. and to orovidepower for l¡ehtins, cook¡ns and other domestic activities\ilould your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generallydescribe.This proiect will not affect the access to solar enerev for anv neiphborins site.b.c.(STAFF COMMENTS)What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposedmeasures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:This oroiect will meet the Washinston State Enerov Code for commerrial construction.Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 13 of 28 7. EnvironmentalHealtha.Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire andexplosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result ofthis proposal? Ifso describe.No.(1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.There is no indication of anv possible contamination of the site from oresent or oast uses.(STAFF(2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design.This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within theproject area and in thevicinity.There are no existine hazardous conditions in the area.(STAFF COMMENTproject's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project.No toxic or hazardous chemical will be stored at the site durins construction or durine occuoancv.(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/19/16EdXinq-SEPA.docPage 14 of 28 (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.No emergencv services will be reouired bevond what is normal for a multifamilvresidence.(5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, ifany:No measures are reouired or orooosed.(STAFF COMMENTS)(STAFF COMMENTS)b. Noise(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipmentooperation, other)?The site is adiacent to Edmonds Wav which is a maior arterv ¡n the area. Thereare not other knownsources of noise near the citc(STAFF COMMENTS)(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term ora long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operationn other)? Indicate what hourts noisewould come from the site.During construction noise will be created bv the vehes and eouipment beine usedThis noise will onlvoccur during normal workins hours. There should be no sisnificant no¡se from the site after constsructionis comoleted(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/1-9/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 75 of 28 (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:None are required.(STAFFoi5¿8. Land and Shoreline Use\Vhat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses onnearby or adjacent properties? Ifso, describe.The site is currentlv used for residential, as are all the adiacent properties. This proposal will continue the(STAFFulre_ db.Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How muchagricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a resultof the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designatedo how many acres in farmland or forestland tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use?The site has been used for residential ourooses since 1938.â.(1) lVill the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal businessoperations, such as oversize equipment access, the application ofpesticides, tilling, and harvesting? Ifso, how:Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 76 of 28 c.Describe any structures on the site.The site currentlv contains 3 one-storv buildines used as residencesd.Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?All 3 existine structures will be demolished.e.What is the current zoning classification of the site?RM-1.5(STAFF COMMENTS)f.oWhat is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?Edmonds Wav Corridor(STAFF COMMENTS)If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?Not Annlicable(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 17 of 28 hHas any part ofthe site been classified critical area by the city? Ifso, specifyNo oart of the site has been classified as a critical area.l.aApproximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?The proiect will include 1 studio apartment, (6) 1-bedroom apartments and (3) 2-bedroom apartments.Occr¡nancv will he arouncl 13 to 15 neonleApproximately how many people would the completed project displace?There are 4 dwelline units on the site currentlv housine 7 oeople.j.(STAFF COMMENT+k.Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:No measures to reduced displacement impacts are contemplated.(STAFF COMMENTl. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is eompatible with existing and proieeted land uses and plans¡ifany:Proiect continues the existing land use on the site, which is compatible with neiehborine land uses.L¡J ì\\Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 78 of 28 9. Housingm.b.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercialsignificance, if any:P¡oject has no impact on agricultural or forest lands. No measure to control impacts are orooosed.Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-incomehousing.10 housine units will be orovided: thev will be a mix of middle and low-income rrnitç^.(STAFF COMMENTS)Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middlen or low-incomehousing.There are 4 middle and low income dwelline units on the site.(STAFFuo(Y_irr..a- s\\¿c.Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:This proiect replaces 4 existine dweliine units with 10 new dwellins units of a similartvoe. No measures toreduce or control housins imoacts are orooosed.Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 19 of 28 10. Aestheticsa.What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principleexterior building material(s) proposed?The maximum he¡eht of the buildinp is 31'.The principle exterior material will be cement board horizontal sidins. with someof vertical sidins.(STAFF CTSoòç'ti'e0-st..ltt ìtf6b.What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?Some yiews of the highwav from neighboring sites will be impacted bv this proiect.(STAFF COMMENTS)c.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:This oroiect will remove 3 older non-descriot buildinps and rpnlace themwith alarçer structure havins astronger presence on the hiehwav. The exterior materials selected for this oroiectcompatible with11neighborine structu res.Light and Glarea. lVhat type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?The onlv exterior liehtins will be for the oarkine lot and for access to the buildins. Allexterior liehtins will bedesigned to meet Edmonds criteria for spillase onto neishborins oroperties. The oarkine lot will be lit onlvRevised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 20 of 28 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?No(STAFF COc.What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?The primarv off-site source of lisht will be the slare from vehicle headliBhts nn Fdmonds Wav(STAFF COMMENTS)d.Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:Lisht and slare imoacts will be controlled bv comolvins with Fdmondc MunalnâI Code standardsresardinp lisht c,nillape12. Recreationa. lVhat designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?There are no recreational spaces in the immediate vicinitv.b.Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.No.(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 21 of 28 c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreationo including recreation opportunities to beprovided by the project or applicant, ifany:No such measures are proposed.(STAFF CesQÒ,13. Historic and Cultural PreservationAre there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, oreligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? Ifso, specifically describe.No.(STAFF COMMENTS)^g_eb.Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This mayinclude human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of culturalimportance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify suchresources.There is no evidence of lndian orhistoric use vicihle nnsite.â.\(STAFF COMMENTS)c.Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near thePreservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc.Since this site has been in residential use for manv vears anv imoacts on historic orItural resources havealrpadrr nrrr rrrpdR.Revised on 9/19/16(STAFF COMMENTS)EdXing-SEPA.docPage 22 of 28 d.Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources.Please include plans for the aboye and any permits that may be required.No such measures are orooosed.(STAFF C14. Transportationa.Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposedaccess to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.The site onlv has street frontase on Edmonds Wav. Dueto an existine traffic divider in front ofthe site. the onlvaceess to the site will be southbound on Edmonds Wav (rieht inl. Access from thewill be restricted to(STAFF COMMENTS)southbound on Edmonds Wav lrisht outì.Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?There are bus stoos on Edmonds Wav annrnyimat¡.lv800 feet north of the site- There are al<obus stoos onb.(STAFF COMMENTS)238th Street SW, approximatelv 600 feet from the site.How many additional parking spâces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have?many would the prbject or proposal eliminate?The new proiect will 16 oarkins soaces includins oneible van stallc.HowThe existins site has aooroximatelv 7 narkinp qnâ.êç(STAFF COMMENTS)Revised on 9/1-9/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 23 of 28 d.WÍll the proposal require any nerv or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or stâtetransportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public orprivate).The oroiect will revise the existine street frontaee to orovide a olantins strio between the sidewalk and thestreet. No other changes to existing transportation svstems are proposed.e.Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oÐ water, rail, or air transportation? Ifsoo generally describe,Nof.How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate whenpeak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial andpâssenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?The ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edit¡on) calculates the number of trins for an apartment complex durinsPM peak hours as 0.5 peldwe[inB unit. This project should generate around 5 vehicular trips during peak dailvvolumes. The onlV regular truck access to the site will be weeklv trash pickup.c.\ilill the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest productson roads or streets in the area? Ifso,Nodescribe.Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 24 of 28 h.Proposed meâsures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:No such measures are orooosed.faß.E C-Ðc-15. Public Servicesa.Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, policeprotection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? Ifso, generally describe.This proiect will sliehtlv increase the pooulation densitv on the site. The imoact onblic services will beminimal.(STAFF COMMENTS)bProposed meâsures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:No such measures are proposed.16. Utilitiesa.Circle utilities currently available at the site:sanitary sewer, septie*ystem, other:electricity,-*atnral-grs, wâter, refuse servicc, telepbone,Revised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPage 25 ol 28 b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the servicen and the generalconstruction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.ElectricalService - Snohomish County PUD; Water - Olvmpic View Water sewer DistrictSewer - Olvmoic View Water Sewer District:All these utilities currentlv serve the site or exist in the ripht of wavalôngthefrnnt nfthe site,(STAFF COMMENTC. SIGNATUREI declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understandthat the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.*November 30. 2018Signature ofProponentlzDate Submitted?oyÌe{u*oL Bg','Mic,l*-t-q- 0" 8a.|,.'l-,ITotctQn^-þJRevised on 9/19/16EdXing-SEPA.docPoge 26 of 28 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 'TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (4251771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a lO-unit multi-family development and associated parking. The 10 units are proposed in a new three (3) story building with a mix of studios, 1- bedroom and 2-bedroom units. Parking for the units will be located adjacent to the building along the northwestern property boundary and access to the proposed development will be taken off of Edmonds Way. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type lll-B decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). Proponent: Haynes Lund, HWL Architects LLC Location of proposal, including street address if any: 23830 - Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel Number 00463301000302 Lead agency: City of Edmonds The tead agency has determíned that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequatety addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 andlor mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created' An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc) This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under '197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Februarv 5. 2019 Project Planner: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact lnformation: City of Edmonds | 121 sth Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 | 425-771-0220 o^t. |-tL?.-tþ\4 Signature You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 Sth Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than February 12. 2019 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Gontact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on .lanuarv 22 2019 at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecy.wa.qov). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below, The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for file number PLN20180069. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division - located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 sth Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. xx SEPA DETERMINATION 1/17l19 SEPA Page I of2ATTACHMENT 7 Notice Mailed to the following XX COMCAST Outside Plant Engineer, North Region 1525 7'th St. SW Ste 200 Everett, WA 98203 XX Washington State Dept. of TransportationAttn: Ramin Pazooki SnoKing Developer Services, M5221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 XX Tulalip Tribal Council 6700 Totem Beach Road Marysville, WA 98270 XX Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Headquarters Station No. 1 Attn.: Director of Fire Services 12310 Meridian Avenue South Everett, WA 98208-5764 Fdmonds Schoo! District No. 15 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Attachments pc: File No. P1N20180069 SEPA Notebook Community Transit Attn.: Kate Tourtellot 7100 Hardeson Road Everett, WA 98203 Olympic View Water & Sewer District 8128 228rn St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Puget Sound Energy Attn: David Matulich PO Box 97034, M/S BOT-1c Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 david. matulich@pse.com M. L. Wicklund Snohomish Co. PUD PO Box '!107 Everett, WA 98206-1107 XX XX XX XX SEPA DETERMINATION t/1 7/l 9.SEPA Page2 of2 © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet Notes Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 162.150 1:3,892 Zoning and Vicinity Map 324.3 ReZones PRD RoW Zoning RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 RM-2.4 RM-1.5 RM-EW BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 OR WMU BP BN FVMU BC BC-EW CG CW MP1 MP2 ATTACHMENT 8 #P20Critlcal Areas Flle$,lnlttal Determlnation - $100E Subsequentinatlon - $50DateDateRecelvedi)rtoCity of EdmondsDevelopment Services DePartmentPlanning DivisionPhone: 425.771.0220www.edmondswa.govÐrCRITICAL ARIiAS CHE,CKLISTThe purpose of this checklist is to enable City staff todetermine whether any critical areas and/or buffers arelocated on or adjacent to the subject property. Criticalareas, such as wetlarrds, streams and steep slopes, areecologically sensitive or hazardous areas that areregulated to protect their functions and values' The City'scritical aiea regutations are contained within EdmondsCommunity Development Code (ECDC) Chapters 23.40through 23.90.A property owner, or an authorized representative, mustfif out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to theCity. Staff will review the checklist, conduct a site visit,and make a determination of whether there a¡e criticalareas and/or critical area buffers on or near the site. If a*Critical Area Present" determination is issued, a reportaddressing the applicable criticai area requirements ofECDC Chapters 23.40 througb 23.90 may be requireddepending on the scope of the proposed activity.Property Ownerts AuthorizationBy my signaturo, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and coffect to the best of myf.no*fuaf" and grant my perrnission for the public officials and the staff of the Cþ of Edmonds to enter the subjectproperry?or t¡e pu¡posåsìf inspection attendant to this application. The undersigned owner, and his/her/its hei¡s, andãr*ignr, in consideràtion on the processing of the applicat-ion agrees to release, inderrnify, defend and hold the City ofEdmonds harmless from any anã ail damages, inchaing reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any actig.n or infractionbased in whole or part opon fulr", misleadLg, inaccurate or incomplete information fumished by the applicant, his/her/itsagents or employees.SIGNATURE OF OWNERD¿,re Iz7hPLEASE PRINT CLEARLYOwner;Rnk Eastside LLCApplicanUAgent:Haynes LundName2603 78th Avenue NEName385 l0lstAvenue SEStreet AddressMedinaWA98039Street AddressBellevue WA98004CityStateEmail address:Email Address:Zip CityState425-643-392',17-rpTextP20 - CritícalAreas ChecklistRevised on l/4/17kkorovkin@qmail.cpmHWLArch@comcast.netPage I of2ATTACHMENT 9 cA File No:1-(tAZorStqSite Information1. Site Address/Locarion:2. PropertyTaxAccountNumber:#P2ACritical Areas Checklist23830 Edmonds Way00463301000302acresIRECEIvEDnEc 13 2018D EVELOPIJIENT SERVICESCOUNTER3. Approximatre Site Size (acres or square feet)4. Is this site currently developed? EI yes tr NoIf yes, how is the site developed.?5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that applytr FIat to Rolling: No slope on/adjacent to the sife o¡ slopes generally less tlran lszo (a verticalrise of r'-feet over a horizontar dista'ce of 66-feet). ¡ uE Moderate: slopes present on/-adiacent to site or *oru than L5% and less thart4ao/o(a verticalrise of ''-feet over a horizontar distance of 25 to 66-feet).n steep: slopes of greater than 407o present on/adjacent to site (a vertical rise of LGfeet over ahorizontal distance of less than 25_ieet).Flave there been landsrides on or near the site in the past? fl yes E NoIf yes, please describe:6.7ISite contains areas of year-round standing water?nYes (approx. depth:site contains areas of seasonal standing water? [ yes (approx. depth:If yes, what season(s) of the year?ElNoENo9' site is in the floodway or floodptain of a water course? fl Floodway tr Floodplain10' site conþiy à c¡gek or 3n area where water flows acros,s the grounds-su úace? E yes EI NoIf yes, are flows year-round or seasonal? [ Year-round E seasonal (time of year: )L1. Obvious wetland is present on site? E yes Ø NottþCgX¿eEi1.3,ReviewedDETERMINATIONFor City Staff UseEarth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard,Area (ESHLA)?h4. Site within designated. North Ed¡rondsor C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site:SCS mapped soit type{s):Zoning:3. Critical AreasRevìsed on I/4/17P20 - CrìtícalAreas ChecklìstPage 2 of2 1:688t!ffi ClryotEdmonds critical Area MapLegendCreeksW Seismic Hazard Areasffi Earth Subsidence and Landslide /[ ] Minimum Buffer Adjacent to Haz! w"ttrnd.Wetlands BoundaryWetlând Boundaries Not CompletelE Wetlând Known Extentsffi FloodplainsStorm Cetch Bas¡nsr <âll othervalues>r YesStorm ManholesI <all olher vâlues>I Yes,) DetentionFacilitiesCulvert. <all othervalues>. Facility FeatureCreeksStorm Line<all other values>- YesFacility [inesC+^,ñ n¡+.hNotescRA2018021423830 Edmonds Way0 28.66 57.3 FeetEWGS_ l 984_Web_M ercatorJuxiliary_S phereO CiÇ of EdmondsTh¡s map ¡s a user generated static output from an lnternet mapping site and is forreference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current, or otheruise reliable.THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION A coordinated utility environment which maximizes joint utility opportunities to provide quality service for the citizens of Edmonds ……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. YOU WILL BE GIVEN A CONFIRMATION NUMBER BY EACH UTILITY ONCE YOU HAVE INFORMED THEM OF YOUR PROJECT. SITE ADDRESS: _______________________________________ Mary McAllister – 425-670-3216 # You will need to provide PUD with a site plan and a completed New Service Questionnaire. New Customer Construction Department - 1-888-321-7779 # Call to verify gas availability and to coordinate service install. You will need to provide parcel number, contact phone number and mailing address. Jeremy Fallt – 425-263-4024 # You will need to provide Frontier with the location of your project, total line requirement, and the date in which service is required. A copy of your development plan may be required. John Warrick 425 263-5328 # You will need to provide Comcast with the location of your project, a copy of your development and site plan (digital copy if available.) The date in which service is required and a list of contact names, phone numbers & mailing addresses. 425-774-7769 For customers in Olympic View Service Area # You will need to provide OVWSD with the survey map of your site and complete a development information form. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND GIVEN TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT THE TIME OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL Rev. 10/1/13 CUSTOMER - EUC CONTACT Form # ATTACHMENT 10 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION January 10, 2019 Haynes Lund, HWL Architects LLC 385 101st Ave. SE. Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Letter of Completeness and Request for Additional Information Edmonds Crossing Apartments Design Review Application PLN20180069 Dear Mr. Lund, The City of Edmonds has reviewed the design review application for the proposed 10-unit Edmonds Crossing Apartments located at 23830 Edmonds Way for completeness pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002. The City has determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and therefore is complete. Please accept this letter as the City’s notice to applicant of determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003. While the application is procedurally complete, additional information and clarifications are needed for continued review of the application. Please respond to the following so review of this application may proceed: Planning Division Comments: 1. Height: a. Height Calculations: Please expand and revise the height rectangle and calculations to include the decks as depicted on the building elevations along the east (Edmonds Way) and north (to parking lot) elevations and site plan. Please see the enclosed handout B41 Height Calculation Information for more details regarding height calculations. b. Elevation Views: Update as necessary with any changes to the height calculation as noted above. 2. Elevation: a. On sheet A30 please clarify the west elevation (#3), it’s unclear where the decks would be located in relation to the proposed floor plans and site plan. I understand that that multi-level decks are proposed along the north parking lot elevation, however the decks that have been omitted seems out of place. Please correct the plans as necessary. All decks must be included on the site plan to verify setbacks, height and lot coverage. ATTACHMENT 11 Page 2 of 5 3. Setbacks: a. A retaining wall is proposed along the property boundary adjacent to the parking lot as shown on sheet C3.0 and L-1.0, please note that retaining walls may not be greater than 3 feet from original grade within the required setback area. Information has not been provided to verify the height of the retaining wall, please provide additional information. 4. Lot Coverage: a. It appears that the site will be well below the maximum lot coverage of 45%, however please note that lot coverage includes any upper level decks. Per ECDC 21.15.110 Coverage means the total ground coverage of all buildings or structures on a site measured from the outside of external walls or supporting members or from a point two and one-half feet in from the outside edge of a cantilevered roof, whichever covers the greatest area. Please make any necessary changes to the lot coverage information provided. 5. Landscaping: a. Type III Landscaping: i. Type III landscaping along the northern property boundary adjacent to the proposed parking lot does not appear to be consistent with the Type III landscaping requirements. Trees are required at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center with no more than 50% being deciduous. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height and living ground cover should cover the ground within three years of planting. Please ensure the proposed landscaping is consistent with the Type III landscaping requirements as detailed in in ECDC 20.13.030.C. ii. Type III landscaping along the eastern property between the front of the building and Edmonds Way appears to meet the intent of the landscaping requirements, however all the proposed trees are deciduous. If you would like to propose only deciduous trees, which is not consistent with ECDC 20.13.030.C, note that the Architectural Design Board may interpret and modify the landscaping requirements. Please revise or submit in writing how the deviation complies with ECDC 20.10.000, see section c. below. b. Type V Landscaping: i. Total amount: In calculating the required amount of Type V landscaping from the number of exterior parking spaces (16 spaces), 280 square feet of Type V landscaping is required (17.5 square feet per parking stall pursuant to ECDC 20.13.030.E). The landscape plan does not show the area provided for the Type V landscaping, please provide. Note that calculated areas may not be used more than once, so the type III landscape area may not also be counted for the Type V area. Page 3 of 5 ii. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 150 square feet of area and must be at least four feet in any direction exclusive of vehicle overhang. The area must contain at least one tree a minimum of six feet in height and with a minimum size of one and one-half inches in caliper if deciduous. The remaining ground area must be landscaped with plant materials, decorative mulch or unit pavers. iii. Minimum size of planting areas: Pursuant to ECDC 20.13.030.E.2.e the minimum area per planter is 64 square feet. Please ensure all the Type V planter areas are consistent the requirements of ECDC 20.13.030.E.2. c. Deviation from landscaping standards: i. ECDC 20.13.000 allows the Architectural Design Board to interpret and modify the landscaping requirements of ECDC 20.13; provided the modification is consistent with the purposes found in ECDC 20.10.000. If the project proposes modifications of the landscaping requirements detailed in ECDC 20.13, please identify the proposed modifications and demonstrate how the proposed modifications are consistent with ECDC 20.10.000. 6. Parking: a. Parking Stall Dimensions: The angled parking space appears to be only 7.5 feet wide. The minimum parking width required is 8.5 feet by 16.5 feet. See Figure 18-2 of section ECDC 18.95.030. In order to use compact parking spaces, pursuant to ECDC 18.95.020.1.b(1) it must first be demonstrated that sufficient parking area is available to provide all required parking spaces at the full width dimensions. Either revise the plan so all parking spaces are full width, or if the intent is to provide compact parking spaces, please provide a plan demonstrating that the required parking can be provided at the full width dimensions as noted in ECDC 18.95.020.1.b(2). Note that compact parking spaces can be no narrower than 8 feet in width. 7. Signage: Page 3 of the cover letter #A.10 “Signage” states that no signage is contemplated at this time however see sheet A30 is referenced, please clarify if any signage is proposed. 8. Lighting plan: The lighting plan appears to only evaluate the proposed light poles within the vicinity of the parking area. The lighting plan should evaluate all exterior lighting associated with the development. The cover letter submitted with the application states that lighting will also be provided along pathways to the building, walkways within the structure, and at all unit entries. Please provide a lighting plan including exterior lighting, lighting location, height and style of fixtures and intensity of illumination. A complete lighting plan is necessary to evaluation design review criteria ECDC 20.11.030.B.8. 9. General Notes: a. Power vault is not shown on the landscape plan, if to be located within landscaping areas show on the plan and note that utilities should be screened from view at street level pursuant to ECDC 20.11.030.A.3. Page 4 of 5 b. There are two Dashed lines provided on the civil plan sets, one appears to be the setback line and I’m unclear what the other dashed line represents, please label or eliminate unnecessary lines. Public Works – Recycling Coordinator: The applicant has successfully reconfigured the driveway entry area to accommodate waste collection trucks so to ensure that they are fully onto the property and off of Edmonds Way. The applicant needs to show a designated outside area where waste containers are to be staged and safely accessed for service. This area can be a flat widened sidewalk near to where the truck is situated. Containers will otherwise be housed inside a designated room that is to be used by residents. Please contact Steve Fisher at 425-771-0235 or by email at Steve.Fisher@edmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding comments. General Engineering Division Comments: For design review the Engineering division reviews the preliminary civil plans for feasibility. The following comments are provided by Engineering Technician, JoAnne Zulauf. Please contact JoAnne directly at 425-771-0220 or by email at JoAnne.zulauf@edmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding her comments. 1. Frontage Improvements and Access: a. Edmonds Way corridor requires 4 ft landscape strip with street trees and a 5 ft sidewalk. Please show street trees in the landscape strip. Trees shall be 45 ft on center and spaced evenly across the frontage. Considering the wider accesses designed, a tree in the landscape area in the center of the “island” and then two trees on the longer frontage to the east will work the best spaced as evenly as possible. Utility locations may need to be adjusted to accommodate this. Please note on the plan “The species shall be determined at a later date by the Parks Manager.” b. Sidewalk improvements shall be implemented across full frontage of property, transitions to existing conditions shall fall outside of the property frontage. Please extend sidewalk and landscape strip on the east end of frontage and begin transition after the property line. c. Please show curb ramp improvements at each side of the access points, and at the west and east ends of the property if needed to transition to existing elevations. d. Please confirm that the DCDVA can fit in the landscape area. Provide approximate vault dimensions 2. Utility Purveyor Information: a. Please complete a utility purveyor account number sheet (EUC Contact form City handout #28 available on the city website) and provide with resubmission. 3. Water and Sewer: a. Water and sewer utilities fall under the purview of the Olympic View Water & Sewer District. Please provide confirmation that OVWSD has been made aware of the proposed project and that the proposal is found to be feasible from their perspective. This can be in the form of an account number assigned by OVWSD to your project to complete the EUC utility handout form mentioned above. Page 5 of 5 Stormwater Engineer Comments: City Stormwater Engineer, Zachary Richardson. Please contact Zack directly at 425-771-0220 or by email at Zachary.richardson@edmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding his comments. 1. A preliminary storm drainage report and plan shall be submitted to the City to confirm project feasibility. Stormwater management shall be provided consistent with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 and the 2014 DOE Stormwater Manual. Refer to Stormwater Addendum, Appendices and Checklists for additional information. Fire Department Comments: South County Fire provided the following comments: 1. Require access width and turning radii to conform to South County Fire access standards. 2. Require Fire lane Markings to conform to Fire Lane marking standards. (Attached) 3. Require Knox key box to conform to access standards. (Attached) 4. Deferred Fire alarm and Sprinklers. (Attached) Comments 2 – 4 may be addressed with the subsequent building permit submittal. Comment 1 needs to be address now as it may impact the overall layout of the site. Please show the turning radius on sheet C2.0 as specified in the attached Fire Land Standards. Please contact Karl Fitterer directly at 425-771-0213 or by email at Karl.Fitterer@edmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding his comments. According to ECDC 20.02.003.D, the above requested information must be submitted within 90 days (or by April 10, 2019) or the application will expire. Since the application has been determined to be procedurally complete, a notice of application will be posted on the subject property and mailed to adjacent property owners within the next two weeks consistent with ECDC 20.03.002. If you have any questions of me, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or via email at michele.szafran@edmondswa.gov. Sincerely, Michele Q. Szafran/ Planner #B41 Revised 9/2010 Height Calculation Information PROCEDURE: Height must be calculated prior to any on-site grading or alteration of topography. It is understood that in rare occasions vegetation may have to be removed in order to gain access to grade. On formal subdivisions of property, a topography map is usually included in the recorded documents on file with Snohomish County or City of Edmonds. It is highly recommended that applicants utilize these maps for determination of height. 1. To determine the maximum height permitted on a site, stake out the smallest rectangle (within the boundaries of the site) that encompasses all four corners of the proposed building outline/building pad at original, undisturbed soil. 2. Projections such as bay windows must be included within this rectangle. Exemptions: Chimneys and eaves projecting no more than 30 inches from the exterior wall of the building and uncovered decks. 3. Select a datum point to establish a starting mark to compute grade elevations at the designated four corners. The datum point must be a permanent point of reference. Use the top of a manhole cover, fire hydrant, or street monument. Reference the datum point elevation at +100. On the site plan describe the datum point and show its location and elevation. 4. Calculate the difference in elevation from the datum point to each corner of the rectangle (above or below the starting elevation of +100) at original, undisturbed soil. Next, add the four corner elevations together and divide by a factor of 4 to determine the average grade of the building pad. On the site plan show the elevations of the four corners and show the calculations of average grade. 5. Take the average grade number and add the maximum allowable height per the specified zoning district. This elevation is the maximum height allowed for the proposed location of the building. In the attached example, the single family average grade is +102.5, add +25 feet, for a maximum height of +127.5. As shown on the plot plan the actual height of the building is +125. Be sure the average grade, maximum allowed height and actual height are noted on the plot plan and elevation view. 6. As in the example on the submitted plot plan show all height calculations, the elevation of each corner, the datum point, the average grade, the maximum height allowed and the actual height of the building, and on one of the elevation views within the architectural plans, show the average grade, the maximum height allowed, and the actual height of the building. city of edmonds development information #B41 Revised 9/2010 7. Height field verification shall be done by the applicant’s agent/contractor and ‘observed’ by the building inspector. The agent/contractor shall set up the equipment; establish the datum point and the point of average grade. These items must be consistent with the approved plan. If the proposed height of a building (as shown on the plans) is within 12 inches of the maximum height permitted for the zone an elevation survey is required. An elevation survey consists of three components, to be conducted by a licensed surveyor. • Prior to construction the surveyor shall establish average grade as specified in ECDC 21.40.030, and shall establish a reference datum point that will be undisturbed and can be freely accessed. • The surveyor shall locate the elevation of the first floor prior to the City under-floor inspection, • A final letter of height confirmation shall be provided upon completion of the structure. Updated: Jan 2018 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on-site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25’ of a fire department connection. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet; outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn-around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 12%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words “FIRE LANE – NO PARKING.” Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12” high, 2” stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18” high x 12” wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48” to 60” above grade. c) Style: Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50’ between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10) Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102.7,102.8 and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety-related requirements. FIRE LANE STANDARDS 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org Fire Prevention Series Emergency Access Standard Emergency Access Standard: The intent of this guideline is to define Snohomish County Fire District 1’s Emergency Access Standard and to provide guidelines for its use and maintenance. The Emergency Access Standard is designed to give authorized Fire Department personnel access to keys for the protected occupancy whether vacant or occupied. This allows Department personnel to quickly gain access to buildings during an emergency and prevents the damage caused by forcible entry. The Department requires a key access system for all occupancies in which there is a fire protection system such as: sprinklers, fire alarm, special protection systems, etc., or where access and other conditions are determined to be unduly difficult. This is based on the rationale that rapid and efficient emergency operations will benefit the occupant by reducing property damage. Knox brand products are the only approved key access system for Snohomish County Fire District 1 area of response, including contract cities of Brier, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace. The Emergency Access Standard within Snohomish County Fire District 1 includes Knox Key Boxes, Knox Padlocks, and Knox Key Switches. In this procedure the term Knox Box may refer to any of the three types of Knox products listed above. Emergency Access Requirements: A Knox box shall be provided at the main entrance of buildings with interior common areas. An additional Knox box shall be provided at the exterior entrance to sprinkler riser/fire alarm control panel (FACP) rooms and other locations deemed necessary for building access. Once the Knox boxes are received, it is recommended that the contractor/owner discuss box placement approval with the Fire Marshal, or Deputy Fire Marshal. Typically boxes are located to the right of the main entrance door and/or Fire Alarm Control Panel/Fire Riser Room door. Boxes will be placed 5-6’ above finished grade. Building Owners should provide the following keys depending on the requirements determined for the premises, and may include: 1. Main entrance (or Master) 2. Interior access (if no Master) 3. Fire sprinkler riser room/fire alarm control panel access 4. Electrical, mechanical, and elevator rooms 5. Fire alarm control panel/manual pull stations 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org 6. Electronic/magnetic key cards On multiple-storied and larger buildings, additional keys may be necessary, for instance, providing roof hatch access or, sets of keys anticipated for multiple firefighting crews. The building Owner/Contractor should contact the Fire Prevention Office to discuss the required Knox box for their building/complex or situation. The Owner/Contractor will use the online ordering system at www.knoxbox.com to order Knox boxes. A more detailed guide for ordering is available from the Fire Prevention Office. Snohomish County Fire District 1’s required Knox boxes include the 3200 Series boxes WITH HINGE. For facilities requiring a larger number of keys or magnetic cards etc, a 4400 Series box may be required. GATES ACROSS FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS Residential - Multi-Family/Private Community Access - Gates across public and private fire department access roads where serving more than two dwellings must meet the following requirements/design: 1. Must have automatic opening feature activated by Opticom compatible or other approved receivers that override all other opening systems. 2. Must have an approved Knox key switch which will be located on the entrance side of the gate. 3. Must have battery back-up or be designed with fail safe mode allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. 4. In private communities where access is existing, any new gates must meet 100% approval from protected property owners. Residential – 1 and 2 Family Dwelling Access - Gates that obstruct Fire Department access roads/driveways that serve one or two dwellings and that are electrically operated, shall meet the following requirements/design: 1. Where gates are electric, must have an approved Knox key switch which will be conspicuously located at the entrance side of the gate. Non-electric gates may be accessed using requirements for “Occupancies other than residential” below. 2. Where gates are electric, must have battery back-up or be designed with fail safe mode when primary power is lost, allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org 3. Access gates must meet unanimous approval from protected property owners where access is existing. Occupancies Other Than Residential - Gates that obstruct Fire Department access roads must meet the following requirements/design: Electrically Operated Gates - The gate control shall be operable by an approved Knox key switch located conspicuously at the entrance side of the gate. In the event of a power failure, the gate shall automatically be transferred to a fail-safe mode allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. In all occupancies, where approved, manually operated gates and barriers may utilize Knox padlocks. Approval is provided normally where conditions are such that delays in gate opening are not deemed as a priority for access urgency. On new construction, all Knox equipment shall be installed before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Building owners will assure that access equipment is maintained and contact Fire District 1 where locks are re-keyed and conditions for emergency access is modified. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) ACCESS – Locking caps are not required for new or existing construction, but may be used where problems of theft and vandalism are occurring, on a case by case basis. Contact the Fire Prevention Office for more information. Edition: April 2017 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org FDC Standard Unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal, All FDC connections will be a 4 inch Storz type fitting, on a 30 degree elbow and away from the building. The FDC Connection shall be within 50 feet of a hydrant. The upright piping will be painted red and labeled with a minimum of four inch white numbering denoting the building address. All existing 2 1/2 inch “Y” fittings will be upgraded upon building improvements to the Storz type connection. Signage may be necessary to show where existing connections are located. IFC 912.2.2 Wherever the fire department connection is not visible to approaching fire apparatus, the fire department connection shall be indicated by an approved sign mounted on the street front or on the side of the building. Such sign shall have the letters “FDC” at least 6 inches(152 mm) high and words in letters at least 2 inches (51 mm) high or an arrow to indicate the location. All such signs shall be subject to the approval of the fire code official. Product Description FDC Building Connection 4" Storz x 4" rigid female National Pipe Thread (NPT) with 30 Degree Elbow. Features Secure Cap, Screen and Chain. Enables quick connections of large diameter hose by fire department to supplement fire sprinkler or standpipe system. The standard color is powder coat black and silver. Other colors are available. Specifications Forged storz heads with stainless steel locks Aluminum extruded connections Laser etching available Exceeds NFPA 1963 requirements Manufactured and assembled in the US Rated pressure 200 psi Nitrile gasket Other choices - Hard coat, K-chrome and K-brass "A" dimension - 7 7/8" UL Listed UL Listed Manufactured to higher tolerances Precision Metal Face - no gasket needed Cap features weep hole Notice of Application and SEPA Determination - File Numbers PLN20180069 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-unit multi-family development and associated parking. The 10 units are proposed in a new three (3) story building with a mix of studios, 1- bedroom and 2-bedroom units. Parking for the units will be located adjacent to the building along the northwestern property boundary and access to the proposed development will be taken off of Edmonds Way. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III-B decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). Name of Applicant: Haynes Lund, HWL Architects LLC Location: 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA, Tax Parcel Number 00463301000302 File Nos.: PLN20180069 (Design Review) Date of Application: December 13, 2018 Date of Completeness: January 10, 2019 Date of Notice: January 22, 2019 Requested Permits: Design Review. Notice of Public Hearing will be provided once a date has been scheduled. Other Required Permits: Building permits. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Determination, SEPA Environmental Checklist Comments on Proposal Due: February 5, 2019. Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Office hours are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:30 a.m. to noon. Information can also be viewed online through the City’s website at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen . Search under permit file number PLN20180069. City Contact: Michele Q. Szafran, (425) 771-0220, michele.szafran@edmondswa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Lead Agency: The City of Edmonds is SEPA lead agency for the proposed subdivision (File Nos. PLN20180069). SEPA Determination: Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11-340(2) for the above project. Date of Issuance: January 22, 2019 SEPA Comments Due: February 5, 2019 SEPA Appeal Deadline: February 12, 2019 at 4:00 p.m Appeals must be filed in writing citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 – 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. ATTACHMENT 12 Þeslqn Two FourlTwô s¡x.,.I ^l,¿irç'Â,r.ñ,þr<Fl-- I raroro.w¡*o* -I I l,h.(ar6r!)a¡6I I l¡.i>mi¡çzrL3"*.¿.;s"aæ..".-MULTI.FAMILYHOUSING23830EDMONDS WAYEDMONDS, WA98026BIIK EASTSIDE ItC2603 78Ilt AVEI{UE t{EltEoDtA, wA e803e12/OJ/æ1A@RENDEREDPLANTINGPLANL-1.3ilt,.::..,\..'_\-..l,ìlIiìlìi,,1IY,+o..i)lIìzÌPE.ì..'. : uNDsilPE, ryP.!tiEDMONDS WAYq.)lñii0'6'o'iq2VNORTHfl+ï'à.s FILE NO.: PLN20180069 Applicant: Haynes Lund DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 22"d day of January, 2019, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above-referenced application. The names of which were provided by the applicant. I, Debbie Rothfus, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correctthis22"d day of January, 2019, at Edmonds, V/ashington. Signed: {BFP747887.DOC;1 \00006.900000\ } FILE NO.: PLN20180069 Applicant: Haynes Lund DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 22"d day of January, 2019, the attached Notice of Application was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Michele Q. Szafran, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correctthis22"d day of January, 2019, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed {BFP747893.DOC; l\00006.900000\ } Everett Daily HeraldAffidavit of PublicationState of Washington )County of Snohomish ìDicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, uponoath deposes and says: that he/she is the legalrepresentative of the Everett Daily Herald adaily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legalnewspaper by order of the superior court in thecounty in which it is published and is now andhas been for more than six months prior to thedate of the first publication of the Noticehereinafter referred to, published in the Englishlanguage continually as a daily newspaper inSnohomish County, Washington and is andalways has been printed in whole or part in theEverett Daily Herald and is of generalcirculation in said County, and is a legalnewspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legalnewspaper by order of the Superior Court ofSnohomish County, State of Washington, byorder dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexedis a true copy of EDH842073 PLN20180069 as itwas published in the regular and entire issue ofsaid paper and not as a supplement form thereoffor a period of I issue(s), such publicationcommencing on 0l/2212019 and ending on0112212019 and that said newspaper wasregularly distributed to its subscribers during allofsaid period.The amount of the feesuch publication is$101.48.Subscribed and sworn before me on this^-,^JaL¿nsaôFNotary Public in and for the State ofWashington.Cityof Edmonds - LECALADS | 14101416MICHELE SZAFRÂNsshLday of Classified ProofNoticeün¡ts arêunlt per 1,500 square l€et ofcommentfeceNarecordon lh¡sobtained at the.equired lee loAv6. N, Édmonds, WAPubl¡shed: January 22, 2019Wednesdays8.30 a.m.Mlchele Q. szâtrân, (425) 77 1 -0224,ñoiice ol PuÞlic Hear¡ng w¡llCrltcal Aßas Oetêmlnåt¡on.to theOfice hours8:00 a.m- lolnformalìonwebsiÞ alpèm¡t tlleNOTICEleåd agsncy lor thePlann¡ngÊDH842073to coß$rct aThe l0a mix oluruls willwlthin thêHW-o,2019of tfËProofed by Sheppard, Dicy,0ll22/2019 08:31:45 amPage;2 YEN SHIU POOL46T1.13TH AVE SEMrLL CREEK WA 98012-551-9ROBINSON JENNAPO BOX 1013EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OGIUSTI RIANA/POTVIN RYAN8606 23BTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026KNOTT MICHELLE/MICHAEL W8725 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026CHEN BAOQUAN/WU XIAOYAN8674 23BTH ST SW UNIT 303EDMONDS,WA 98026WAHLMEIER PATRICK J/HURDANNA LB7L3 23BTH ST SW # A2EDMONDS,WA 98026OSWALD LAURALEE NB7L3 Z3BTH ST SW #47EDMONDS,WA 98026AUGENBRAUN IEANNEB7L323BST SWA-11.nnìr^trTñct r^r^ rl.)n,)zI]t,lvlvl\ l-rJ, vvfl a ov LUWEBB ARLA K TTEE871.9 23BTH ST SW # B6EDMONDS,WA 98026RIGGS STEPHEN ELSON8723 Z3BTH ST SW UNIT C5EDMONDS,WA 98026AYERS GERRIT RPO BOX 459EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OCURTIS TAMARA LB7T9 238TH ST SW #B-1-EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OHARLOWE IOHN DBBO9 24OTH S WEDMONDS, WA 98026NICKEL KENT C & TAMMY S23822 B6TH AVE WEDMONDS,WA 98026MCCOY CHRISTINA8674 23BTH ST SW #306EDMONDS,WA 98026CLARK BRENT A &APRIL LB7T3 238TH ST SW UNIT A3EDMONDS,WA 98026CLAUSEN BRENNA L871"3 23BTH ST SW UNIT A9EDMONDS, WA 98026LEE RICHARD/MAHONEYKATHERINEB7T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B3EDMONDS, WA 98026NIELSEN ALBERTAB7T9 23BTH SW #87EDMONDS,WA 98026BAKER IERALD R8723 ?3BTH STREET SW UNIT C7EDMONDS,WA 98026DAWSON LINDAPO BOX 846EDMONDS, WA 98020KARNER KATHY8629 24OTH ST SW C-2EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OJODAR DAVID8717 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026ROBERTS ELIZABETH8674 23BTH ST SW UNIT 206EDMONDS,WA 98026TERRENZIO LAURA C87T3 23BTH ST SW #41EDMONDS,WA 98026WAALE VIENNA MB7T3 23BTH ST SW UNIT A6EDMONDS,WA 98026CLIFFORD MICHAEL L/JOANNE C87L3 23BTH ST SW UNIT A1OEDMONDS,WA 98026HARRIS AMANDA CB7L9 238TH ST SW UNIT B-4trnÀrrìNrrìq \^/^ oQn?ÁUúttlVL\ú9t ll Ir JVVUvMORGAN EAMON871.T23L5T ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026YIN HONGJING8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A1EDMONDS,WA 98026 DAVIS KEVIN P/LYNNETTE K8629 24OTH ST SW #42EDMONDS,WA 98026TOM JAMIE8629 24OTH ST SW #81EDMONDS, WA 98026SMITH GREG8629 24OTH ST SW # 85EDMONDS, WA 98026SYMONS CHANDLER D8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT C-3EDMONDS,WA 98026WANG CHRISTINABB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT 3EDMONDS,WA 98026GEORGE STEVEN BBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT 82EDMONDS,WA 98026LIM ALYS E HBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT C3EDMONDS, WA 98026DODD CHARLES KJRBB2B 238TH ST SW # D5nnrf^\rhı rÀr^ ^ô^1/Dulvlul\uJ, uv¿l aÕvLoGEBREHANNA NURILIGNBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT A-1EDMONDS, WA 98026-8909ROBERTSON WILLIAM ABB28 23BTH ST SW UNIT C4EDMONDS, WA 98026-8909STENBERG ANDREA R8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A5EDMONDS,WA 98026YUAN CAN8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT B3EDMONDS,WA 98026BAYLESS ION I / LINDA C8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT B 6EDMONDS, WA 98026BRYSON JOAN E8629 24OTH ST SW C-4EDMONDS,WA 98026TSERING TASHI/WANGMONGODUPBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT A4EDMONDS,WA 98026MADRID ANGELINEBB28 23BTH ST SW #84EDMONDS, WA 98026SCHULD JENNIFER LBB2B 238TH ST SW #D2EDMONDS,WA 98026DEVOLI RANDOLPH I/ROBINBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT D6TII-ll\/r^ÀTIìe I¡1I^ OOn?Á,l-l-rlvlWlì.lJJt VV Ì1. ,wvt-vHEINE SHARON KBB28 23BTH ST SW UNIT 83EDMONDS, WA 98026-8909SONG JACK/THERESIABB28 23BTH ST SW UNIT D3EDMONDS,WA 98026-8909RICE EMILY J/ROGERSIOHN/PAMELA G8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A6EDMONDS,WA 98026KERCI ENDRI/SAMOYLENKOEKATERINA8629 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026MILES EDWARD I8629 24OTH ST SW #C1EDMONDS,WA 98026MrN J00N KBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT A2EDMONDS,WA 98426MCLEOD SARAH/ GREGBB28 23BTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026HEMPELMANN JENNIFERBB2B 23BTH ST SW C2EDMONDS,WA 98026HALL JACQUELINE ABB2B 23BTH ST SW # D4EDMONDS, WA 98026HINTZEN BARBARA226L7 BTTH PL WËnrifrìì\rnq \^/^ oan?Á-p.,))aDUl.lVL\uJt vv/\ JvvuTOFTDAHL DUSTIN W & RACHELEBB2B 23BTH ST SW UNIT C1.EDMONDS, WA 98026.8909BOERNER LYNN MB7I3 238TH ST SW UNIT A-4EDMONDS,WA 98026-89L6 MCLEOD DONNA AB7L3 238TH ST SW UNIT A-5EDMONDS, WA 98026.8916HAYNES MECHELLE & NAMl0NGH0oN86T4 Z38TH ST SW UNIT 1,02EDMONDS,WA 98026.8947HAAGA TERESA G8614 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT 1.05EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947REYES JUAN86T4 Z3BTH ST SW UNIT 204EÐMONDS, WA 98026-8948DUENAS PAUL F8614 23BTH ST SW UNIT 302EDMONDS, WA 98026.8949THOMAS TERESA87T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-2EDMONDS, WA 98026.8980KUSTER KARENB7L9 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT B-9EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980GREENFIELD-MATHISON ROBINK8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C.3EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982ZINGLER KARI8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-11EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982ZAHARCHENKO ARTEM A &URBAS IRENAB7Z9 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026-9018VERNON VICTORIA V8713 23BTH ST SW UNIT A-8EDMONDS, WA 9BO2 6-891.6HUSSEN SANI/YIFIRU MULU8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 103EDMONDS, WA 98026.8947IANSSEN MARCELLA M8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 106EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947GHERMAN DIANE E86T4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 205EDMONDS,WA 98026-8948AMUNDSEN CAROL J86T4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 304EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949DEEGAN SHANE PB7T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-5EDMONDS,WA 98026-8980SHARMA ABHA8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-10EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980HOOPERALAN K8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C-4nntrr^Àrnc r^t^ .lo^tÁ ooQ,Dl.rlvlwl\ LrJ, vv t1, -J t)v ¿.v-rJ ) v LPRATT DAVID T & LISA J23828 B6TH AVE WEDMONDS, WA 98026-9OOONORDEEN KEVIN RBBOS 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 98026-9019THOMAS MARLENE SB6'J.4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 101EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947CHRISMAN LORI A8614 23BTH ST SW UNIT 105EDMONDS,WA 98026.8947KUONEN WILLIAM D86T4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 203EDMONDS,WA 98026-8948AL-QURISHI HAMED ALI & ERA V86T4 238TH ST SW UNIT 301EDMONDS,WA 98026-8949HERRING JENNIFERB6L4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 305EDMONDS,WA 98026-8949BESS TERESA C87T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-8EDMONDS,WA 98026-8980BULANYY IGOR & BULANAVALENTINA8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C-2EDMONDS,WA 98026.8982MICHAELS SHEILA/ TRACY8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C-BËnì\rôr\Trìq \^/^ oQn?Á-aqq?!Yl'MlVgt tttL ¿vvev v/vuREMEDIOS A PB72T24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026-9018ANSTEAD DAVID8801 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 98026.90T9 STEWART SYLVIA B8BT9 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 98026-90t9TUTTLE ELIZABETH C8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A4EDMONDS,WA 98026.9026ADAM ELLIEBO2B 238TH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 98026.9265SUNDE THOR24225 BSTH AVE SEWOODINVILLE, WA 9BO7 2.9525MCCALLISTER TERRY1702 192ND STSHORELINE, WA 981.55GORONCZY KATHLEEN M TTEE2 WHISPERING CEDARS CTBELLINGHAM, WA 98229.27 9 4EDMONDS WAY LAW CENTERLLC23901. EDMONDS WAYEDMONDS, WA 98026.9024CHANG KANGOK L8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT B2EDMONDS, WA 98026.9026GERLACH DAVIDPHILIP/ELIZABETH RAE233T8 29TH AVE WBRIER. WA 98036ASAFAUDINEHC&DIASRAFAEL/ASAF MOHAMM4104 T64TH ST SW UNIT 301LYNNWOOD, WA 9BOB7GOLDEN ART LP2674 COLBYAVE #1EVERETT, WA 98201.CHEN SAM & HUA LAIT8421.36TH AVE SEBOTHELL, WA 98012ZISSERMANN ANDREY D &KATHERINE L8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A3EDMONDS, WA 98026-9026AOKI AYUMI J8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT C5EDMONDS,WA 98026-9026KUEHNE STEPHEN6306234TH ST SWMOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA98043MACHARIA KAREN1415 N ZOOTH ST #86SHORELINE, WA 981.33REYNOLDS THURMAN &PRISCILLA8621 VISTARAMAAVEEVERETT, WA 98208-3539 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LISTAttach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list.Notary Public inthe State of Washington{-6ffiÐffifivffiffif:ll l3 2018DËVËLOPilIENT SERVICËSCOUNTEROn my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided were supplied bythe Office of the Assessor of Snohomish County and appear to represent all propertieslocated within 300 feet of the subject property.Applicantor Appl icant's Representative/4Subscribed and sworn to before me thisÅgday ofilowmbtfResiding atêe//ru,< /aA-N*ta:;¡ ?zx:$ieStstc sf ltras,irl:Í^reLAt!Ð!Å htlH,e gL q ifi Þ,1;:'nUl{Y ôCIMMtSStÕM Ëx$:'¡$ìËsJurìs 11,?.*'T.çRevised on 9/30/I IP2 - Adjacent Property Owners ListPage 2 of2 February 22, 2019 City of Edmonds A9n: Michele Szafran 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Edmonds Crossing Apartments 23830 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026 Design Review ApplicaMon PLN20180069 Dear Ms. Szafran: The purpose of this le9er is to respond to your le9er dated 1/10/2019 requesMng addiMonal informaMon on the above referenced Design Review ApplicaMon. We have described our responses to your comments below, and in the a9ached le9er from SDA, dated 2/19/2019. The changes to the project that are described in these le9ers have all been clouded on the drawings that are included with this re-submi9al. Planning Division Comments: 1.Height: The building height calculaMons on Sheet A02 have been modified to incorporate the decks into the rectangle encompassing the building. The average grade has been adjusted according to the new calculaMon. The finished floor elevaMon for the ground level has been revised so that the total height of the building conforms to the height limitaMons. 2.ElevaMon: Sheet A30 has been modified to add a northwest elevaMon which shows the decks at the 2- bedroom units. The decks are also shown on the southwest elevaMon. All decks are shown on the plans. 3.Setbacks: Sheet C3.0 has been modified to show the height of the retaining wall within the setback conforms to the 3’ height limitaMon. Note that the retaining wall now has been moved to align with the curb line for the parking in order to provide sufficient planMng area for trees. 4.Lot Coverage: Notes have been added to Sheet A01 to show the lot coverage calculaMon. The area of the building includes the areas of decks. 22 February 2019 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 1 ATTACHMENT 13 5.Landscaping: A.Type III Landscaping: I.The retaining wall has been changed in this area to allow for more planMng. Trees and shrubs have been added. PlanMng reflects type III requirements. II.Plan has been revised to show 50% Deciduous trees. PlanMng reflects type III requirements. B.Type V landscaping i.Type V areas have been delineated on the plan. ii.Type V areas have been delineated on the plan. Square footage area exceeds required square footage. iii.Size of planMng areas for type V are listed on plans. C.No deviaMons from landscaping standards are proposed. 6.Parking: Notes have been added to Sheet C2.0 to show that all parking stalls conform to the City’s required dimensions for full sized stalls. 7.Signage: Sheet A30 has been modified to add the address number on the front of the building. That is the only signage for this project that is proposed at this Mme. 8.LighMng Plan: A new Sheet E1 has been added to the set which replaces the previous Site LighMng plan. The new drawing shows the light levels for the walkways to the building as well as the spillage beyond the parking area. 9.General Notes: a.The tentaMve power vault locaMon has been indicated at the north corner of the site on both Sheet C4.0 and Sheet L1.0. We are assuming at this Mme that the power connecMon will be an underground pull vault. b.The second dashed line on the civil plans has been removed. The remaining dashed line indicates the required building setback and it is noted as such on Sheet C2.0. Public Works — Recycling Coordinator A note has been added to Sheet A20 to indicate the designated area for trash & recycling staging for pickup. This area will be constructed as a concrete sidewalk. 22 February 2019 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 2 General Engineering Division Comments: 1.Frontage Improvements And Access: See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. 2.UMlity and Purveyor InformaMon: See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. 3.Water and Sewer: See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. Stormwater Engineer Comments 1.Preliminary storm drainage report See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. Fire Department Comments 1.Access width See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. 2.Fire lane markings See SDA response le@er dated 2/19/2019. 3.Knox box We will show the knox box locaMon on our building permit submi9al. The know box locaMon and keys will comply with the standards provided. 4.Fire Alarms and Sprinklers We will provide a separate permit applicaMon to cover the fire alarms and sprinklers for this project some Mme aher the building permit submi9al. We appreciate your prompt review of this project. Please contact us if you have any quesMons or require any further informaMon. Sincerely, Haynes Lund Architect 22 February 2019 Haynes Wilson Lund Architects LLC page 3 SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 Everett, WA 98201 P: 425.486.6533 F: 425.486.6593 February 19, 2019 City of Edmonds ATTN: Michele Szafran 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds Crossing Apartments (PLN 2018-0069) Response to Review Comments SDA PROJECT NUMBER 410-002-18 Dear Michele: We are pleased to resubmit the accompanying documents in support of the Edmonds Crossing Apartments permit application. This package is submitted in response to a notice of complete application and request for additional information, issued by the City on January 10, 2019. The request for additional information included several review comments, which have been addressed. This letter is intended to address the Engineering Division comments, Stormwater Engineer Comments, and some of the Fire Department Comments. A list of those comments is provided below (plain text), as well as a response (bold italics), to indicate how each comment was addressed: General Engineering Division Comments: Review Staff: JoAnne Zulauf, Engineering Technician 1. Frontage Improvements and Access: a. Edmonds Way corridor requires 4 ft landscape strip with street trees and a 5 ft sidewalk. Please show street trees in the landscape strip. Trees shall be 45 ft on center and spaced evenly across the frontage. Considering the wider accesses designed, a tree in the landscape area in the center of the “island” and then two trees on the longer frontage to the east will work the best spaced as evenly as possible. Utility locations may need to be adjusted to accommodate this. Please note on the plan “The species shall be determined at a later date by the Parks Manager.” The requested planter & walk have been added. Street tree locations are shown on the preliminary civil site plan (Sheet C2.0) and the landscaping plans. b. Sidewalk improvements shall be implemented across full frontage of property, transitions to existing conditions shall fall outside of the property frontage. Please extend sidewalk and landscape strip on the east end of frontage and begin transition after the property line. The requested planter & walk have been added. c. Please show curb ramp improvements at each side of the access points, and at the west and east ends of the property if needed to transition to existing elevations. The requested curb ramp improvements have been added to the plans. Michele Szafran February 19, 2019 Edmonds Crossing Apartments (PLN 2018-0069) Response to Review Comments Page 2 SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 Everett, WA 98201 P: 425.486.6533 F: 425.486.6593 d. Please confirm that the DCDVA can fit in the landscape area. Provide approximate vault dimensions The DCDVA won’t be in the planter strip, since the existing water main is beneath the proposed sidewalk (behind the planter). The DCDVA will be installed in a traffic-rated box within the driveway. 2. Utility Purveyor Information: a. Please complete a utility purveyor account number sheet (EUC Contact form City handout #28 available on the city website) and provide with resubmission. An EUC contact form is included with this submittal. 3. Water and Sewer: a. Water and sewer utilities fall under the purview of the Olympic View Water & Sewer District. Please provide confirmation that OVWSD has been made aware of the proposed project and that the proposal is found to be feasible from their perspective. This can be in the form of an account number assigned by OVWSD to your project to complete the EUC utility handout form mentioned above. An EUC contact form with OVWSD’s project number is included with this submittal. Stormwater Engineer Comments: Review Staff: Zachary Richardson 1. A preliminary storm drainage report and plan shall be submitted to the City to confirm project feasibility. Stormwater management shall be provided consistent with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 and the 2014 DOE Stormwater Manual. Refer to Stormwater Addendum, Appendices and Checklists for additional information. A preliminary drainage report is provided with this submittal. Fire Department Comments: Review Staff: Karl Fitterer, South County Fire 1. Require access width and turning radii to conform to South County Fire access standards. The Civil site plan has been revised to show 25-ft inside turning radii, and 20-ft min. width on the driveway access. The interior parking lane is less than 150-ft long, and doesn’t require a turn-around. 2. Require Fire lane Markings to conform to Fire Lane marking standards. (Attached) Fire lane markings have been added to the civil site plan (Sheet C2.0). Michele Szafran February 19, 2019 Edmonds Crossing Apartments (PLN 2018-0069) Response to Review Comments Page 3 SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 Everett, WA 98201 P: 425.486.6533 F: 425.486.6593 3. Require Knox key box to conform to access standards. (Attached) Comment to be addressed by others. 4. Deferred Fire alarm and Sprinklers. (Attached) Comment to be addressed by others. This concludes our responses to the City’s request for information. All comments not addressed in this letter will be addressed by others in separate letters. Feel free to call with any questions, or if we can provide anything further. Sincerely, SDA Kenneth J. McIntyre, PE Senior Civil Engineer CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-unit multi-family development and associated parking. The 10 units are proposed in a new three (3) story building with a mix of a studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units. Parking for the units will be located adjacent to the building along the northwestern property boundary and access to the proposed development will be taken off of Edmonds Way. The existing residences at the site will be removed. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III-B decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). PROJECT LOCATION: 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA, Tax Parcel Number 00463301000302 NAME OF APPLICANT: Haynes Lund, HWL Architects LLC FILE NO.: PLN20180069 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A public hearing in accordance with Chapter 20.06 ECDC will be held by the Architectural Design Board on April 3, 2019 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 250-5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 5th Ave North, Edmonds, WA 98020 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday – Friday (8:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. only on Wednesdays) or online through the City’s website at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for permit PLN20180069. A copy of the staff report will be available at least seven days prior to the hearing. CITY CONTACT: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 ATTACHMENT 14 Everett Daity HeraldAffidavit of PublicationState of Washington )County of Snohomish lDicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, uponoath deposes and says: that he/she is the legalrepresentative of the Everett Daily Herald adaily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legalnewspaper by order of the superior court in thecounty in which it is published and is now andhas been for more than six months prior to thedate of the first publication of the Noticehereinafter referred to, published in the Englishlanguage continually as a daily newspaper inSnohomish County, Washington and is andalways has been printed in whole or part in theEverett Daily Herald and is of generalcirculation in said County, and is a legalnewspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legalnewspaper by order of the Superior Court ofSnohomish County, State of Washington, byorder dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexedis a true copy of EDH849103 PLN20180069 as itwas published in the regular and entire issue ofsaid paper and not as a supplement form thereoffor a period of I issue(s), such publicationcommencing on 0312012019 and ending on0312012019 and that said newspaper wasregularly distributed to its subscribers during allof said period.The amotrnt of the fee for suchs72.24.Subscribed and sworn before me on thissslsJÒ{ÀJÒtqlhan¿nhLBl¡day of\Notary Public in and for the State ofWashington.City ofEdrnond¡ - LEGALADS I l4l01416MICHELB SZAFR,A.Naa+otAe¡;^¿rBLrÛO¡wl¡lttr\\A3 Classified ProofNumb6rAPPUCANT;be romov6d.rn op€n Gcordslte is1;500 squareEdtriondè. WA,crwPubtrshed: March 20,hearing.SerylcosEOIt849t03Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy,03l20l20l9 08:23:26 amPage'2 FILE NO.: P1N20180069APPLICANT: HWL Architects LLCDECLARATION OF MAII¡NGNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGOn the 20 day of March,20t9, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailedby the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subjectof the above-referenced application.l, Diane Cunningham, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws ofthe State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 20 day ofMarch, 2}tg at Edmonds, Washington.Signed FILE NO.: PLN2OI800ó9Appliconil HWL Architects LLCDECTARATION OF POSTINGOn the 20th doy of Morch, 2019, the oltoched Notice of Public Heoring wosposted of the subject property, Civic Holl, Librory ond Public Sofety buildings.l, Michele Q. Szofron, hereby declore under penolty of perjury under the lows ofthe Stote of Woshington thot the foregoing is true ond correct this 20th doy ofMorch, 2019, of Edmonds, Woshington.Signed{BFP747893.DOC; l\00006.900000\ } YI¡I^u3/v-oÐ-008-tu¡ot'/üa^E'Á,un nYEN SHIU POO14677 13TH AVE SEMrLL CREEK WA 98012-5519ROBINSON JENNAP0 BOX 1013EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OGIUSTI RIANA/POTVIN RYAN8606 23BTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026KNOTT MICHELLE/MICHAEL W8725 24OTH ST SWEÐMONDS,WA 98026CHEN BAOQUAN/WTJ XIAOYAN861.4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 303EDMONDS,WA 98026WAHLMEIER PATRICK ]/HURDANNA L8713 23BTH ST SW # A2EDMONDS,WA 98026OSWALD LAURALEE NB7T3 23BTH ST SW #47EDMONDS, WA 98026,^dn-do¿ ptoqa¡ ol Jol? ?¡op u!¡e arnqreq e¡ p ze¡¡dagI o09tS 6ÄU3ÂV ¡¡reqe6 ol zosllllni - rapd g salpel sa¡¡anb¡¡7tIII¡uaura6reqrap suasYWEBB ARLA K TTEE8719 238TH ST SW # B6EDMONDS,WA 98026RIGGS STEPHEN ELSON8723 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT C5EDMONDS,WA 98026Ï oogus @^¡tiurv [@AYERS GERRIT RPO BOX 459EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OCURTIS TAMARA L8779 23BTH ST SW #B-1EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OHARLOWE IOHN DBBO9 24OTH S WEDMONDS,WA 98026NICKEL KENT C & TAMMY S23822 86TH AVE WEDMONÐS, WA 98026MCCOY CHRISTINA8614 23BTH ST SW #306EDMONDS,WA 98026CLARK BRENT A & APRIL L8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A3EDMONDS,WA 98026CLAUSEN BRENNA LB7T3 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT A9EÐMONÐS, WA 98026LEE RICHARD/MAHONEYKATHERINE8779 23BTH ST SW UNIT B3EDMONDS,WA 98026NIELSEN ALBERTA8719 238TH SW #87EDMONDS,WA 98026BAKER IERALD R8723 23BTH STREET SW UNIT C7EDMONDS,WA 98026I *re6p¡dn-do¿asodxe ¡- rode¿Pea¡i o¡au¡¡Guo¡epuag r ¡lDAWSON LINDAPO BOX 846EDMONDS, WA 9BO2OKARNER KATHY8629 Z4OTH ST SW C.2EDMONDS, WA 9BO20IODAR DAVIDB7I7 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026ROBERTS ELIZABETH861,4238TH ST SW UNIT 206EÐMOI\DS,WA 98026TERRENZIO LAURA CB71323BTH ST SW #41EDMONDS,WA 98026WAALE VIENNA M8713 23BTH ST SW UNIT A6EDMONDS,WA 98026CLIFFORD MICHAEL L/IOANNE C871.3 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT A1OEDMONDS,WA 98026HARRIS AMANDA CB7T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-4EDMONDS,WA 98026MORGAN EAMON87712315T ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026YIN HONGJING8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A1EDMONDS,WA 98026Í og9¡9 a¡e¡dua¡ @'üa^v.:1-!i slaqsf oload r{segAUGENËBåUN IEANNE^-4^^4údor^7^1411 I L3 LSV'Jt JVV fr-l-rEDMo/ù,wA slo26 YIItÄut^v-o9-008'tuo)i,Í¡aJìB',l,lfntûMCLEOD DONNA A871.3 23BTH ST SW UNIT A-5EDMONDS, W A 98026.891,6HAYNES MECHELLE & NAMI0NGH0ON861.4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 1.02EDMONDS,WA 98026-8947HAAGA TERESA G8614 23BTH ST SW UNIT 105EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947REYES iUAN86T4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 204EDMONDS,WA 98026.8948DUENAS PAUL F86T4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 302EDMONDS,WA 98026-8949THOMAS TERESA8779 23BTH ST SW UNIT 8.2EDMONDS,WA 98026-8980KUSTER KAREN871.9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-9EDMONDS,WA 98026-898OGREENFIELD.MATHISON ROBINK8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-3EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982ZINGLER KARI8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C-11EDMONDS,WA 98026-8982ZAHARCHENKO ARTEM A &URBAS IRENA8729 24OTH ST SW4ÐMONDS,WA 98026-9018I ooets @^U¡lr\\r [@]¡uaua6reqrop suasvVERNON VICTORIA V8713 238TH ST SW UNIT 4.8EDMONDS,WA 98026.8976HUSSEN SANI/YIFIRU MULU86T4 238TH ST SW UNIT 103EDMONDS,WA 98026.8947JANSSEN MARCELLA M8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 106EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947GHERMAN DIANE EB6L4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 205EDMONDS,WA 98026-8948AMUNDSEN CAROL I861.4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 304EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949DEEGAN SHANE P871.9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-5EDMONDS,WA 98026-8980SHARMA ABHAB7T9 23BTH ST SW UNIT B-10EDMONDS, WA 9BO26.89BOHOOPER ALAN Kn-ô- .1ôrlr (r.Tr (rI^I ITì\lTrF l1 /lÓ/ LJ ¿JO Ifl JI JVV UI\II U'TEDMONDS, WA 98026-8982PRATT DAVID T & LISA J23828 B6TH AVE WEDMONDS,WA 98026.9OOONORDEEN KEVIN RBBOS 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026-9019f n re6pl dn-dod asodxa - ¡ede¿ Poeli oraull 6uolBpueg - ¡'THOMAS MARLENE S86T4 238TH ST SW UNIT 101EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947CHRISMAN LORI A861,4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 105EDMONDS,WA 98026-8947KUONEN WILLIAM DB6t4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 203EDMONDS,WA 98026-8948AL-QURISHI HAMED ALI & ERA V8614 23BTH ST SW UNIT 301EÐMONÐS, WA 9BO2 6.8949HERRING IENNIFER861,4 23BTH ST SW UNIT 305EDMONDS,WA 98026.8949BESS TERESA C8719 ?3BTH ST SW UNIT B.BEDMONDS,WA 98026.8980BULANYY IGOR & BULANAVALENTINA8723 23BTH ST SW UNIT C-2EDMONDS,WA 98026-8982MICHAELS SHEILA/ TRACY8723 238TI] ST S\^/ LINIT C-8EDMONDS,WA 98026-8982REMEDIOS A PB72724OTH ST SWEDMONDS, W A 98026-901"8ANSTEAD DAVIDB8O1 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS,WA 98026-90T9Í o09ls ateldual @'{lanv.T-!¡ slaqel olaad ^sel!t ,ndn-do¿ p¡oqa¡ or ¡or?^9¡I apugeernqreqe¡ çza¡¡dagI ooglS sÄU3ÂV ¡¡.reqe6 al zasllltni - ralðd p sãllle+ sauanbllt YIII^u3^v-oÐ'008-truof,"Á¡a/re' ,trn¡¡lSTEWART SYLVIA BBB19 24OTH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 9BO2 6.901'9TUTTLE ELIZABETH C8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A4EDMONDS, WA 98026-9026ADAM ELLIEBO2B 238TH ST SWEDMONDS, WA 98026-9265SUNDE THOR24225 BsTH AVE SEWOCDINVILLE, WA 98072.9525MTERRY1702 t9STwA 98155SHOGORONCZY KATHLEEN M TTEE2 WHISPERING CEDARS CTBELLINGHAM, WA 98229 -27 9 4,^dn-do¿ p¡oqo¡ al ¡al?^-ð¡êp ulle a¡nq¡Bq e¡ ç za¡¡da¿Í oOslS @ÀU3AV ¡¡reqe6 3l zasllltRi - ¡apd P salltsl sa¡Pnb¡¡1I¡II¡uaure6reqrap suðsV- rede¿pea¡- YEDMONDS WAY LAW CENTERLLC23901" EDMONDS WAYEDMONDS, WA 98026-9024CHANG KANGOK L8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT B2EDMONDS, WA 98026.9026GERLACH DAVIDPHILIP/ELIZABETH RAE2331.8 29TH AVE WBRIER, WA 98036ASAFAUDINEHC&DIASRAFAEL/ASAF MOHAMM41"04 3.64TH ST SW UNIT 301LYNNWOOD, WA 9BOB7GOLTLP261.4LBY AVE #1WA 98201CHEN SAM & HUA LAITB42T 36TH AVE SEBOTHELL, WA 98012ZISSERMANN ANDREY D &KATHERINE L8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT A3EDMONDS,WA 98026-9026AOKI AYUMI J8629 24OTH ST SW UNIT C5EDMONDS, WA 98026.9026KUEHNE STEPHENæA6 234TH ST SWMOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA98043KARENL41ZOOTH ST #86CHE, \¡/A 98133REYNOLDS THURMAN &PRISCILLA862l VISTARAMAAVEEVERETT, WA 9BZOB-3539f rorr, @^U¡lntr fVlf ¡y¡a6p¡ dn-do¿ asodxei o¡au¡6uo¡epuago09 15 ale¡dual gifu anY-as¡qaqEl6¡aa¿ Äse3 ADJAGENT PROPERTY OWNERS LISTAttach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners Iist.Notary Public inthe State of Washington{;effi#ffifivffimtlll i B aotgüNGLOPMENT SERVITËgCOUNTERÐn my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided were supplied bythe Office of the Assessor of Snohomish County and appear to represent all propertieslocated within 300 feet of the subject property.Applicant orApplicant's RepresentativelQSubscribed and sworn to before me thisÅgday of,Vowm@fResiding at&e//(uu( /U*-Hcfary.?*.lii¿$lstc of iYasT¡.',:t* ^ tcLAüÐtå tÂtf{Agt-{ åÕftlfl :*uMY CCIMtdr$S¡CIhr cxp'REsJuns 11"?lXçRevised on 9/30/1 IP2 - Adjacent Property Owners ListPage 2 of2 Project Number:PLN201 80069Applicant's NameRNK EASTSIDE LLCProperty Location23820 EDMONDS WAYDate Application Received12.13.18te Application Routed12.14.18ZonMULT| FAMTLY (RM-1.5)1 O-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGProject Descriptionlf you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact:Responsible StaMICHELE SZAFRAN1778- -- --LEIF BJORBACKName of lndividual Submitting CommentsBU¡LDING OFFICIALDate: 117119TitllZ t hor" reviewed this tand use proposalformy department and I do not have onycomments. My deportment moy alsoreview this project during the buildingpermit process (if applicoble) and reservesthe right to provide ødditional comments atthat time,t t hor" reviewed this lond use proposolformy department and hove the followingcom m e nts or conditi ons :ATTACHMENT 15 CITY OF EDMONDS – PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM PW-Engineering Fire PW - Maintenance Building Project Number: Applicant’s Name: Property Location: Date Application Received: Date Application Routed: Zoning: Project Description: If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: Ext. Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title: Date: I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and I do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: ATTACHMENT 16 Updated: Jan 2018 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on-site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25’ of a fire department connection. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet; outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn-around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 12%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words “FIRE LANE – NO PARKING.” Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12” high, 2” stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18” high x 12” wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48” to 60” above grade. c) Style: Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50’ between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10) Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102.7,102.8 and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety-related requirements. FIRE LANE STANDARDS 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org Fire Prevention Series Emergency Access Standard Emergency Access Standard: The intent of this guideline is to define Snohomish County Fire District 1’s Emergency Access Standard and to provide guidelines for its use and maintenance. The Emergency Access Standard is designed to give authorized Fire Department personnel access to keys for the protected occupancy whether vacant or occupied. This allows Department personnel to quickly gain access to buildings during an emergency and prevents the damage caused by forcible entry. The Department requires a key access system for all occupancies in which there is a fire protection system such as: sprinklers, fire alarm, special protection systems, etc., or where access and other conditions are determined to be unduly difficult. This is based on the rationale that rapid and efficient emergency operations will benefit the occupant by reducing property damage. Knox brand products are the only approved key access system for Snohomish County Fire District 1 area of response, including contract cities of Brier, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace. The Emergency Access Standard within Snohomish County Fire District 1 includes Knox Key Boxes, Knox Padlocks, and Knox Key Switches. In this procedure the term Knox Box may refer to any of the three types of Knox products listed above. Emergency Access Requirements: A Knox box shall be provided at the main entrance of buildings with interior common areas. An additional Knox box shall be provided at the exterior entrance to sprinkler riser/fire alarm control panel (FACP) rooms and other locations deemed necessary for building access. Once the Knox boxes are received, it is recommended that the contractor/owner discuss box placement approval with the Fire Marshal, or Deputy Fire Marshal. Typically boxes are located to the right of the main entrance door and/or Fire Alarm Control Panel/Fire Riser Room door. Boxes will be placed 5-6’ above finished grade. Building Owners should provide the following keys depending on the requirements determined for the premises, and may include: 1. Main entrance (or Master) 2. Interior access (if no Master) 3. Fire sprinkler riser room/fire alarm control panel access 4. Electrical, mechanical, and elevator rooms 5. Fire alarm control panel/manual pull stations 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org 6. Electronic/magnetic key cards On multiple-storied and larger buildings, additional keys may be necessary, for instance, providing roof hatch access or, sets of keys anticipated for multiple firefighting crews. The building Owner/Contractor should contact the Fire Prevention Office to discuss the required Knox box for their building/complex or situation. The Owner/Contractor will use the online ordering system at www.knoxbox.com to order Knox boxes. A more detailed guide for ordering is available from the Fire Prevention Office. Snohomish County Fire District 1’s required Knox boxes include the 3200 Series boxes WITH HINGE. For facilities requiring a larger number of keys or magnetic cards etc, a 4400 Series box may be required. GATES ACROSS FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS Residential - Multi-Family/Private Community Access - Gates across public and private fire department access roads where serving more than two dwellings must meet the following requirements/design: 1. Must have automatic opening feature activated by Opticom compatible or other approved receivers that override all other opening systems. 2. Must have an approved Knox key switch which will be located on the entrance side of the gate. 3. Must have battery back-up or be designed with fail safe mode allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. 4. In private communities where access is existing, any new gates must meet 100% approval from protected property owners. Residential – 1 and 2 Family Dwelling Access - Gates that obstruct Fire Department access roads/driveways that serve one or two dwellings and that are electrically operated, shall meet the following requirements/design: 1. Where gates are electric, must have an approved Knox key switch which will be conspicuously located at the entrance side of the gate. Non-electric gates may be accessed using requirements for “Occupancies other than residential” below. 2. Where gates are electric, must have battery back-up or be designed with fail safe mode when primary power is lost, allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org 3. Access gates must meet unanimous approval from protected property owners where access is existing. Occupancies Other Than Residential - Gates that obstruct Fire Department access roads must meet the following requirements/design: Electrically Operated Gates - The gate control shall be operable by an approved Knox key switch located conspicuously at the entrance side of the gate. In the event of a power failure, the gate shall automatically be transferred to a fail-safe mode allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment or default to the open position. In all occupancies, where approved, manually operated gates and barriers may utilize Knox padlocks. Approval is provided normally where conditions are such that delays in gate opening are not deemed as a priority for access urgency. On new construction, all Knox equipment shall be installed before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Building owners will assure that access equipment is maintained and contact Fire District 1 where locks are re-keyed and conditions for emergency access is modified. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) ACCESS – Locking caps are not required for new or existing construction, but may be used where problems of theft and vandalism are occurring, on a case by case basis. Contact the Fire Prevention Office for more information. Edition: April 2017 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.firedistrict1.org FDC Standard Unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal, All FDC connections will be a 4 inch Storz type fitting, on a 30 degree elbow and away from the building. The FDC Connection shall be within 50 feet of a hydrant. The upright piping will be painted red and labeled with a minimum of four inch white numbering denoting the building address. All existing 2 1/2 inch “Y” fittings will be upgraded upon building improvements to the Storz type connection. Signage may be necessary to show where existing connections are located. IFC 912.2.2 Wherever the fire department connection is not visible to approaching fire apparatus, the fire department connection shall be indicated by an approved sign mounted on the street front or on the side of the building. Such sign shall have the letters “FDC” at least 6 inches(152 mm) high and words in letters at least 2 inches (51 mm) high or an arrow to indicate the location. All such signs shall be subject to the approval of the fire code official. Product Description FDC Building Connection 4" Storz x 4" rigid female National Pipe Thread (NPT) with 30 Degree Elbow. Features Secure Cap, Screen and Chain. Enables quick connections of large diameter hose by fire department to supplement fire sprinkler or standpipe system. The standard color is powder coat black and silver. Other colors are available. Specifications Forged storz heads with stainless steel locks Aluminum extruded connections Laser etching available Exceeds NFPA 1963 requirements Manufactured and assembled in the US Rated pressure 200 psi Nitrile gasket Other choices - Hard coat, K-chrome and K-brass "A" dimension - 7 7/8" UL Listed UL Listed Manufactured to higher tolerances Precision Metal Face - no gasket needed Cap features weep hole MEMORANDUM March 8, 2019 TO: HWL Architects c/o Haynes Lund FROM: Steve Fisher, City of Edmonds Public Works, 425-771-0235 RE: Trash collection area review PLN –20180069 Edmonds Crossing, 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds The correction on sheet A20 now indicates the designated area for staging of the residents’ waste containers. The sidewalk that leads from the building to the drive aisle will need to meet the drive aisle at grade – not a curb. Then the full length of the staging sidewalk will also now be on grade – no curb. This will ensure smoother rolling of the carts to the collection trucks. One thing to point out – the 50 square foot space for container storage will likely handle 5, maybe 6 of the standard 96-gallon containers, rather tightly. This calls for residents sharing service in some manner. Some tenants could easily use their own 20-gallon containers (mini- can service rate) if individual service is desired by everyone. This could free up space. Please let me know if you have any questions. ATTACHMENT 17 MEMORANDUM December 21, 2018 TO: Michele Szafran, Associate Planner FROM: Steve Fisher, City of Edmonds Public Works, 425-771-0235 RE: Plan review for trash collection scenario PLN20180069 – Edmonds Crossing, 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds The applicant has successfully reconfigured the driveway entry area to accommodate waste collection trucks so to ensure that they are fully onto the property and off of Edmonds Way. The applicant needs to show a designated outside area where waste containers are to be staged and safely accessed for service. This area can be a flat widened sidewalk near to where the truck is situated. Containers will otherwise be house inside a designated room that is to be used by residents. Date: March 18, 2019 To: Michelle Szafran, Planner From: JoAnne Zulauf, Engineering Technician Zachary Richardson, Stormwater Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Subject: PLN20180069 –Design Review Edmonds Way Edmonds Crossing- 23830 Edmonds Way Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. It is requested that the following be included as a condition of project approval. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT 18 Prrsr ¡c UTtLTTY DtsTfrrcl N(). 1SN¡()ll()f\4lsll C(JlJÎ\l I YProviding qual¡ty valer, potrer and seníce al a cot Wef¡ñve price that ouïcttstonør\t valueFebrualy 6;2019Diane CunninghamCity of Edmondsl22l sth Avenue NorthEdmonds, TVA 998020Dear Ms, Cunningham:Reference No.: Edmonds Ctossing ApartmentDistrict DR Nunrber: 19-011The District presently has sufficient elechic system capacity to sele the ptoposedclevelopment. However, the existing District facilities in the local atea may require upgrading.The developer is rcquired to supply the District with suitable locations/easernents on all parcelswhere electrical facilities must be installed to serve the proposed development. It is unlikely thateasements will be granted on Dishict-owned plopelty, ol consents granted within Distlicttransnússion line couidors, Existing PUD facilities may need relocations or modifications at thedeveloper's expense, Any relocation, alteration or lemoval of District facilities to accornmodatethis project shall be at the expense of the project developer, and must be coordinated with the PUDin advance of final design. Please include any utility work in all applicable permits.Cost of any work, new or upgrade, to existing facilities that is required to connect thisproposed development to the District electric system shall be in accordatrce with the applicableDistrict policy. The developer will be rcquired to supply the Dishict with suitablelocations/easements upon its property fol any electrical facilities that must be installed to serve theproposed development.Please contact the Dishict prior to design of the proposecl project. For information aboutspecific electric service rcquircments, please call the Disttict's South Connty office at425-670-3200to contact a Customel Engineer.Sincerely,IT.1, 21 n'UCaYlv Ttfwll'út*ttJason ZyskowskiSenior ManagerPlanning, Engineering, & Technical ServicesCc: Haynes Lund1802 - 751h Strcct,S,W. o Evcrctt, WA o 98203 I Mailing Atldrcss; P.O. Box I 107 r Everett, WA r 98206-1107425-783-4300 rToll-free in Western Washington at l-877-783-1000, cxt.4300 o wrvrv.snopud.co¡r¡ATTACHMENT 19 Szafran, Michele From: Sent: lo: Attachments: Subject: Szafran, Michele Tuesday, January 29,2019 1:1 1 PM 'Alm, Peter' RE:SEPA NOTICE (P1N20180069) 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds Site Dev. Plans & Lanscaping.pdf Peter Alm, I have attached the preliminary civil plan set for your review. Per the plans, the project will include curb cuts with a turnout and frontage improvements. I also have included the landscape plan. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments. Regards, Michele Q. Szafran / Planner City of Edmonds L2L 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 425-77L-022O, x L778 michele.szafran@edmondswa.gov General permit assistance, online permits, and Web GIS: http://www.edmondswa.gov/handouts.html Permit Center Hours: M, T, Th, F 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - L2:00 PM From: Alm, Peter <AlmP@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 29,2019 9:23 AM To: Szafra n, Michele <Michele.Szafra n@edmondswa.gov> subject: sEPA NoTlcE (P1N20180069) 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds Hello Michele, lf the developer is impacting the curb, gutter andlor pavement of SR 1-04, please let me know so WSDOT can review these changes. Thanks. Thank you, Peter Alm WSDOT- NW Region Development Services 206-4É,0-47Lt PO Box 33031-0 MS 240 1-5700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133-9710 ATTACHMENT 20 From: Cunningham, Diane <Diane.Cunningham@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 22,2OL9 1L:59 AM To: 'SEPA Unit' <sepaunit@ecv.wa.gov>; 'David Matulich' <david.matulich@pse.com>; 'Kate Tourtellot' <kate.tourtellot@commtrans.org>; 'Olympic View Water' <KellvB@ovwater.com>; Pazooki, Ramin <PazookR@wsdot.wa.gov>; 'SnoPUD' <mlwicklund@snopud.com>; 'Stewart Mhyre' <Mhvres@edmonds.wednet.edu>; 'Zachary Lamebull'<zlamebull@tulaliptribes-nsn.gov>; Zweber, Kevin <Kevin.Zweber@edmondswa.gov> Subject: SEPA NOTICE (P1N20180069) 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds Attached is a DNS and SEPA checklist for 1O-unit multifamily development at 23830 Edmonds Way, Edmonds. Please let me know if you have any questions Thank you, Michele Q. Szafran / Planner M ichele. szafra n@ Ed mondswa. gov 425.771.020 2