Loading...
Response to Comments for ENG and Fire.pdfTERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP December 4, 2017 City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 2"d Floor 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Fi iC� pus �� RE: NYLAND APARTMENTS (formally Edmonds Apartments) - RESPONSE TO CORRECTION NOTICE (PERMIT# BLD20170899/0900) Dear Development Services, Thank you for your review of the Nyland Apartments project (formally Edmonds Apartments). The following is a response to the review comments from the Planning, Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. The review comments are listed below along with our responses in bold. Our proposed site, civil and landscape plans and supporting documents have been resubmitted back to the City of Edmonds for our second review. REVIEW COMMENTS BY JOANNE ZULAUF ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN, 9/21/17 GENERAL 1. Provide an itemized engineers cost estimate for both on -site and off -site (right-of-way) improvements, including traffic control and all utility installations. Use the King County Bond Quantity Worksheet (available on the county website) and utilize "write-in" sections where appropriate. The engineers cost estimate will be provided prior to plan approval. a. The amount of the bond will be based on 120% of the City approved estimate for the off -site improvements. Understood. b. A 3.3% inspection fee is calculated for the project based on 120% of the City approved estimate for the entire project improvements. Understood. 2. Please add a note to plans stating "A separate right-of-way construction permit is required for all work within the city right-of-way." Please note, a ROW permit application with contractor's signature shall be provided to the city prior to issuance of civil construction plans. Note added on Sheet C0.1. 3. Please provide a written response from the geotech that the civil plans are consistent with the geotech report. Geotechnical review letter provided with our resubmittal. 4. Please consider moving the paving sheets (currently C1.1 and C1.2) to the end of the construction sheets to mimic the flow of a construction job. Please move the general notes to the first or second sheet. We are using a conventional sheet sequence for which I've used my entire career. I my experience, the developers and contractors like to see the site / paving plan as the Csheets for general orienting of the site and understanding of the finished project.1 8 }j opy RESUB 1'� CIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DEC 08 2017 5027 51" Avenue SW Seattle WA 98136 phone 206.923.0590 website www.tcrral'ormudisi mvou'! com BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMO DENTS NYLAND APARTMENTS — RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 12 5. Please submit a traffic control plan for work on 244th. A Traffic Control Plan will be provided prior to plan approval. We have added a water main extension on SW 244th Street. We'd like an initial review by the City prior to providing a TCP. Include a haul route on 1st or second sheet. Provided on Sheet 0.2. 7. Some sheets are missing the City Engineering Division approval block. Please revise. This approval block has been added to all civil sheets, except for the Olympic View Water & Wastewater permit sheets. 8. Olympic View Water and Sewer District shall have their own approval block on pages specific to their review and approval. The applicant will be required to submit plans approved and signed by OVWSD prior to the final approval of the civil plans by the City. We are under review with OVWSD. Sheets 1-5 are specific to the District reviewed water and sewer design and include their approval block. 9. Stormwater Checklists (found in the Appendices of the Addendum) are required to be submitted for all projects. Please complete and return Checklist #2, #3, #4, and #6 and any other checklists that may apply to this project. The lists are a combination of informational material and plan requirements; due to the formatting of the checklists, there is definitely some overlap within each checklist and across the checklists. They are still a work in progress. Ultimately though they contain details that you may have overlooked in our code and addendum or in the Manual so it is definitely to your advantage to complete them. See attached completed checklists. 10. A Stormwater Covenant is required to be recorded against the property based on the proposed stormwater facilities for the project. Please complete the covenant, including notarization and required exhibits and submit to the city. The document must be complete, but will not be recorded prior to permit issuance. Prior to construction final location of facilities are to be verified (by field inspection and asbuilt) and then the covenant will be recorded. The Stormwater Covenant will be submitted prior to plan approval. Sheet C1.0 — COVER SHEET 11. Move construction sequence on this sheet. The Construction Sequence was moved to Sheet C0.2 12. Include General Construction Notes. Please revise: Provided on Sheet C0.2 — Civil Notes 13. change 2016 to 2017 WSDOT/APWA revised 14. change "Washington State..." to "2012/14 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)" revised 15. replace references to city of Edmonds water and sewer regulations/requirements to information for OVWSD water and sewer. revised 16. Please revise "Governing Agencies" . See Handout E28 as a guide to the information needed for this section. Include City of Edmonds as purveyor of Stormwater. Also, please remove COE reviewers names and emails from the plans as they will not be the first contact for construction. revised 17. Please add property owner information. added 18. Add project zone information. added 19. Add project description. added SHEET C1.1 PAVING PLAN 20. Use the textures in the legend to show the access drive limits. Create an existing and proposed paving texture to use for those areas. added TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS— RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 13 21. Striping is part of the civil review of the parking area, please add all striping to this plan. Include all striping required by the Fire Marshall. added 22. Are those bollards shown around the fire hydrant? Please label. If not, please add them. Callout added 23. What does "C" in the parking stalls refer to? The texture shows concrete so not needed to show that? Changed to stencil "COMPACT". 24. Provide dimensions for the parking stalls. Just one for each size stall or irregular stalls. added 25. Legend notes "Light Duty Paving" and "Heavy Duty Paving". Please use texture to delineate areas of each. added 26. Is the space along the south parking stalls, next to building 2 intended to be a parking stall. If not, please provide paving striping to deter cars from using it for parking. Backup area revised 27. Note #5 references concrete striping, some areas to be striped are asphalt. Callout revised 28. Note the fence height on this plan. Fence height spec added. 29. Unable to locate mailbox. Mailbox added SW of Bldg #1. 30. Note aisle width. Please confirm with Fire comments that aisle width and turn around is acceptable. Added. 31. Please revise note regarding berm to one option. Whichever option is chosen, the note should be on the drainage sheet too and be clear on the plans how it will work. Asphalt berm callout noted, trenchdrain note omitted. 32. The details for the following paving notes should be included in the civil set of drawings; Note # 6 and 7, block wall. The block wall will be reviewed by both the building division and the engineering division. Block wall detail added on Sheet C6.4 (design by project geotech engineer). SHEET C1.2 PAVING PLAN (FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS) 33. To avoid confusion, please change the name of this sheet to Frontage Improvements. Sheet name changed to "244T" STREET ACCESS". I've also added Sheet C5.1— SW 244th Street Improvements in order to reflect the proposed roadway restoration as a result of the 2441h St watermain extension and replaced driveway. 34. Will a monument or pole sign be installed? If you are planning to install a sign, please indicate the location and dimensions of the sign to show no utility conflicts or sight distance issues are created. Sign shown on Sheet C1.2. 35. Indicate the proposed location of the fire/address sign on 244th. Sign shown on Sheet C1.2. 36. This property falls within the RM 1.5 Zone. 7 ft to 10ft Sidewalks are required in this zone. Width is dependent on available right of way. 7 ft sidewalks shall be required. 7.0' sidewalk now shown from face of curb to back of sidewalk. 37. It appears that the light standard encroaches into the public sidewalk. A 5 ft clear path shall be shown for the sidewalk where the pole is located. If a 5 ft clearance cannot be met, light standard may need to be moved. We have 5.2' clearance from face of pole to face of curb. 38. Extruded curb is not permitted in the right of way. Please remove extruded curb shown between sidewalk and property line. Removed. 39. Please show the rockery or wall along the east side of the access drive. Ex. rockery symbol added. 40. If the rockery enters the right of way, please add note that it will be removed. Rockeries are prohibited in the right of way and where they are constructed on private property must be a distance from the property line equal to the height of the rockery. Please review the code section 18.40.020 TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS — RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 14 carefully to understand all the prohibitions. The B62 Retaining Wall handout, located under the building division handouts on our website, is available for wall construction information if needed to meet grade conditions. Additionally, Per ECDC Chapter 18.70 approval of an Encroachment Permit may be granted to locate a Retaining Wall within the City right-of-way if it does not interfere with the public's use of the right-of-way and/or if the proposal benefits the public interest, safety or convenience. Ex. rockery is not within the R/W. 41. Use the correct texture to show the access drive limits. Revised. 42. Add dimensions to the paved drive and the access easement. Added. 43. Please label all water lines as existing/proposed. Added. 44. Note that water meter lids shall be replaced with drive rated lids where necessary. Water meters will be removed from the drive aisle; relocated to planters. 45. Overhead power to the site is shown. All utilities serving the property, including power shall be underground. Per follow-up discussion, the overhead wire can remain since the Denny's is served via overhead wires from an onsite pole to their restaurant. 46. The existing 10' sewer easement limits are unclear. Linetype revised. 47. "Ex. A.C. Paving" is called out in the access easement. Please add note to the plans stating existing failing, damaged or non-ADA compliant frontage improvements shall be removed and replaced as determined by the City Engineering Inspector. Added. 48. City of Edmonds requires a 2 ft minimum sawcut, please revise note. The road will be restored with an grind/overlay. 49. Add the COE standard details for paving and reference wherever paving will be performed in the right of way. I have not found a half -width grind/overlay detail from the City. 50. Legend notes "Light Duty Paving" and "Heavy Duty Paving". Please use texture to delineate areas of each. Added. 51. Please show a transitional sidewalk panel on the west and east side of the driveway approach outside of the ramps. This panel shall be a minimum of 4 ft in length and shall act as a transition between the new and existing width, and from any non-ADA conditions of the existing sidewalk to the new sidewalk meeting the current City and ADA requirements. Added. 52. Utility patches shall be combined and full width or half width overlay will be required dependent on the extent of disturbance. Where utility patches fall entirely within one travel lane, the overlay shall extend to the centerline of roadway. Where utility patches extend into both travel lanes then a full width overlay is required. Half width overlay proposed. See Sheet CS.1 SHEET C2.1 EROSION CONTROL 53. Please revise sheet title to TESC and Demolition. Revised. 54. Clearly note that TESC details can be found on Sheet C6.1. Note added. 55. A copy of this sheet can be submitted with your demolition application with the added note: "Demolition of structures only. Clearing and Grading not approved with this permit." Understood. 56. Reference the location of the SWPPP. Note added. 57. Submitted SWPPP was prepared using the 2005 Stormwater Manual. The City has adopted the 2012/14 Stormwater Manual as of January 1st, 2017. Please revise SWPPP to current code. Revised. 58. SWPPP notes 4803 bcy cut and 726 bcy fill. It does not include the 339 bcy noted as stripped on plan sheet C0.1. Please revise for consistency. Revised. 59. Add standard notes for erosion control. (see 2012 SWMMWW Vol II, Appendix II -A). Added to this Sheet. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS — RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 15 60. Add name and contact number for CESCL or preparer of the SWPPP or other tesc responsible person on plan sheet with construction sequence. Note added but blank; contractor not chosen yet. 61. Construction is proposed to begin in wet weather season. Tesc proposed shall meet wet weather tesc requirements. Specific wet weather requirements shall be prominently noted on plan and noted in construction sequence. Schedule changed; clearing and earthwork proposed during Dry - Season. Note added and SWPPP revised. 62. Show job shack location, if any. Added. 63. The location of the temporary sediment pond is in the same location as the proposed stormwater system. Please revise plans to avoid this conflict. Moved to the bioretention planter area. TESC pond can remain in place until the sitework is nearly complete and then the bioretention planter can be installed on TESC pond removed. 64. A temporary sediment pond typically is designed to remove sediment no smaller that medium silt (0.02mm). This method does not lower the turbidity enough for the runoff to leave the site. See 2014 SWMMWW BMP C241. Minimum turbidity of 25 NTUs is required for runoff directed off site. The temp sediment pond may be used but will be subject to daily turbidity testing. Provide a point for testing the NTUs after the pond and before the property line. The testing is to be provided by special inspection. A special inspection form from the engineering division shall be completed with all required signatures and submitted prior to plan issuance. Other options include removing the water from the pond via baker tank or similar. Please clarify which option is to be followed by the contractor or revise plan using another tesc measure. We are planning for Dry -Season clearing and grading. We expect less issues of erosion and sediment control. Sediment pond sized for the 10-yr/24-hr storm event. 65. Show all existing trees on the plan. Indicate trees to be removed and show tree protection for all trees to remain. Add standard detail for tree protection. Added. 66. The BMPs noted in the SWPPP to be installed shall be shown on the plans. Add note referencing other measures (from SWPPP) to be installed "as needed". Added. 67. All tesc bmp standard details referenced are from the SWMMWW, Vol II chap 4, please replace COE details with the SWMMWW details on sheet C6.1. Please use the stormwater manual detail reference numbers so reference can be made to the stormwater manual extended summary of the bmp if needed. Revised. SWPPP REPORT 68. Section 2.2. Cut and Fill amounts are not consistent with Sheet. Revised. 69. Section 6.2.1 Please correct "If turbidity exceeds 250 NTU" to 25 NTU. Revised. 70. Appendix B Construction BMPs is missing page 2A-73, which includes part of the description of the sediment pond. Please add page and check for other missing pages. Revised. SHEET C3.1— GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 71. The portion of segmental wall ranges from 2 ft to 6 ft. The "large" segmental wall ranges from 2 ft to 3 ft. Are they mislabeled as the smaller wall states it is being designed by others? The wall standard detail 3/3.2 is consistent with the COE detail E8.12 Modular Block Wall. At heights over 4 ft, they must be designed by an engineer. Also a 2 ft shy distance must be maintained between driveway areas. See new Sheet C6.4 — Wall Details as provided by Associated Earth Sciences. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS— RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 16 72. There is a symbol on the center landscape strip located on the north row of parking stalls. It appears to have no label. If existing cb, please provide rim and invert elevations, if not, please label to identify. —found it on the sewer plan -please label the new light standard. Labeled as a parking light. 73. Rolled asphalt berm or trench drain call out. Please choose one and depict on the plans. A trench drain will require an invert elevation at the connection to tightline. Asphalt berm proposed, storm trench option omitted. 74. Please label the Bioretention Swale as a Bioretention Planter. Also please correct reference from 3/C4 to 2/C6.2. There is no sheet C4 in the drawing set. Revised. 75. The very first infeasibility criteria for bioretention-in the SWMMWW Vol V, page 7-9 is the following: "Where professional geotechnical evaluation recommends infiltration not be used due to reasonable concerns about erosion, slope failure, or down gradient flooding." Please review the Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report Section 4.3 on page 4. "infiltration into the till is not recommended." Please choose another treatment consistent with those conditions or provide specific information in the stormwater report stating that this system is the appropriate choice for the soil conditions. The Bioretention Planter is designed for Runoff Treatment only with an underdrain to the downstream detention system. No infiltration capacity was assumed when sizing this facility. The existing till soils will provide very little infiltration and the use of the underdrain will keep any infiltration head to a minimum. 76. The note located at northeast of site "See Sheet C4 for Offsite Storm Line" references sheet C4. Sheet C3.2 is the location of that information. Revised. 77. Where the sewer enters the adjoining condominium property, please extend to show the point where is crosses the proposed storm line. Provide approximant inverts for both pipes at point of crossing. Revised. 78. Provide a copy of the easement agreement (draft okay) with the condominiums for stormwater installation and access. Draft stormwater easement agreement with Sunrise at Edmonds Condominiums provided within Appendix E of the revised Storm Drainage Report. 79. See Stormwater Engineer Comment Letter for additional comments on Sheet C3.1. a. If a vault is chosen for stormwater mitigation, a separate structural plan and calculations shall be provided. The vault submittal will be sent out for peer review. The fee is $300 plus the consultants peer review fee which will be pass through. Underground Wiring Requirements of ECDC 18.05 shall be followed. All utility services shall be installed underground. Design has been changed to an underground detention tank system. 54-in diameter CMP proposed. b. Show location of pad mounted transformer; it is to be located on private property. Added near the NW corner of the site. C. Show location of dry utilities and required utility separation (5-feet from City utilities within the ROW and 3-feet from water/sewer/storm utilities on private property). Added. SHEET C3.2 — GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 80. Please provide the bottom and top elevation of the rockery on the condo property at the location of the proposed storm line. If the rockery will be removed at that point and it meets any of the prohibition criteria, please provide a proposal to replace. See comment #21 above under SHEET C2.1. Added. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS — RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 17 SHEET C4.3 — SEWER PLAN 81. The plans show an existing sewer easement. Is there a sewer line in it? Please provide a copy of the easement language to confirm the installation of other improvements do not interfere. The dumpster, for example. There is no existing sewer main along the east property line. We are working on getting this easement relinquished by the District. Sheet L1.1— LANDSCAPE PLAN 82. Add Note: "A separate irrigation permit must be obtained from the City Public Works Department. Prior to final acceptance provide a copy of the backflow test report to the City's Cross - Connection Control Specialist. Test reports can be faxed to 425.744.6057 or e-mailed to jeff.koblyk@edmondswa.gov. Backflow testing will be required on an annual basis thereafter." Understood. 83. Please review Civil Sheet C4.2. Please see the fire equipment placement and provide plantings that will not interfere with access. Plantings have been omitted near the fire hydrant and FDC's 84. The bioretention planter is shown with 5 large bushes that spread up to 5' in width. Please arrange and choose planting that will leave access to clean out and to beehive outlet free for maintenance of the mitigation system. The proposed shrubs have been moved. STORMWATER REPORT 85. Page 7. Please elaborate or revise the criteria used to move down the bmp lists. The infeasibility criteria must be addressed consistent with the 2017 COE Stormwater Code and Addendum, and the 2014 Stormwater Manual. The report has been revised to include the Infeasibility Criteria provided within your Addendum. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS— RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 18 REVIEW COMMENTS BY ROBERT C. EDWARDS, PE STORMWATER ENGINER 8 15 17 Background This is classified as a Category 2 Small Site because it proposes impervious area exceeding 5,000 SF. Category 2 Small Site Projects are subject to Small Site Minimum Requirements 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Minimum Requirement 41 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plan Comments: 1. TIR WWHM Page A-8, The vault modeled is rectangular 4.75' deep, but the Stormtech chambers are semi -circular 3.75' deep. As such, the model over estimates the volume. Please provide an accurate WWHM model of the proposed system. The design has changed to underground detention tanks. The WWHM calcs have been revised to use 54" dia tanks with 6" dead storage. Modeling reflects 1551f of tank. 140 If of tank is proposed with the remaining storage provided by the 4 — 54" dia manholes. See updated drainage report. 2. TIR Downstream Drainage Analysis: The analysis is stamped by an agricultural engineer. The DOE manual and Edmonds regulations require the report be prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington in Civil Engineering. I have stamped this report. 3. TIR Downstream Drainage Analysis Page 3: The report references a stormwater supplement to the Edmonds code. The 2017 Edmonds code uses an addendum and checklists. The supplement is for the superseded 2010 code. Revised. 4. TIR Downstream Drainage Analysis Figure 4 and Pages B-11 through B-18: The analysis appears to be for an older version of the design and does not reflect discharging to the existing storm drain system in condominium complex north of the project site. Revised. 5. Sheet C3.1: The callout for the segmental wall on the left side of the sheet is cutoff. Please adjust the callout for readability. Revised. 6. Sheet C3.1: Label the 445 contour. Added 7. Sheet C3.1: The note "SEE SHEET C4 FOR OFFSITE STORM LINE" should reference Sheet C3.2 Revised. 8. Sheet C3.1, Structure Table: CBs 16, 18, 20, and 21 have 8" of cover. The City of Edmonds requires a minimum of 12" cover for non -driven surfaces. Revised. 9. Sheet C3.1, Structure Table: CB #25 is mislabeled 24. Revised. 10. Sheet C3.1, Pipe Schedule, Pipes L, N, and Rare listed as 2% Min. They calculate to 5.03%, 17.3%, and 20.0% respectively. Revised. 11. Sheet C3.1: Detention system specifies a chamber system with an open bottom. The geotech does not recommend infiltration. Additionally, the proximity of the retaining wall immediately to the east will express "infiltrated" groundwater. The bioretention planter also infiltrates and therefore does not meet the geotech's recommendation. The design has changed to underground detention tanks. The BioRetention Planter is not modeled to infiltration runoff; it is designed to provide treatment only with underdrain and overflow designed to discharge to the detention tanks. 12. Sheet C6.2, Detail 1: The lower orifice is shown as 1.00 in. The WWHM modeling was performed with a lower orifice size of 2.0 in. WWHM calcs revised. 1" orifices used. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS- RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 19 Minimum Requirement #2 - Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Comments: 1. SWPPP Appendix A: The erosion control plan and details do not fit the letter size page. Revised. Minimum Requirement 43 - Comments: None Minimum Requirement #4- Source Control of Pollution Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems Comments: None Minimum Requirement #S - Onsite Stormwater Management Comments: None Minimum Requirement # 6 - Runoff Treatment Comments: None Minimum Requirement #7 - Flow Control Comments: See MR#1 comments Minimum Requirement 48 - Wetland Protection Comments: None Minimum Requirement 149 - Operation and Maintenance Comments: None Minimum Requirement # 10 - Offsite Analysis and Mitigation Comments: See MR#1 comments Minimum Requirement 411 - Financial Liability Comments: None REVIEW COMMENTS BY KEVIN ZWEBER, DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE MARSHALL, 9/11/17 1. Provide a Fire Prevention Note section listing the following: Provided on Sheet C0.2 o Fire lane markings shall be provided in accordance with - IFC 503.2 & 503.3 and City of Edmonds/Fire District 1 Standard. o Premise identification - IFC 505.1 provide address numbers, minimum 12" height, 1' stroke, contrasting colors on each building, location to be approved by the Fire Marshal's Office. Provide sign on 2441n o Fire department key box and gate controls - IFC 506 and COE/FD1 Knox Box Standard, provide one (1) Knox Box on each building near the Fire Riser/FACP room door. TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. NYLAND APARTMENTS— RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS December 4, 2017 Page 1 10 o An automatic fire sprinkler system is required. (IFC 903.2.8, 903.2.1.6 (WA), 903.3.1.2, 903.1.2.1). o Fire riser room — co -located fire riser and fire alarm control panel in the same room. o Provide portable fire extinguishers in accordance with — IFC 906. o A monitored automatic fire alarm system is required (IFC 907.2) 2. Provide under deferred submittal: Understood o Fire connection permit. o Automatic fire sprinkler permit. o Automatic fire alarm permit. o Emergency radio system/Distributed antenna system (DAS) if required. 3. Sheet C1.1— Call out fire lane markings per standard. Provided on Sheet C1.1. 4. Sheet CIA - Call out all fire access roads turning radius. Provided on Sheet C1.1. 5. Sheet C4.1— Locate the Fire Department Connection (FDC) in the landscape area just northwest of the DCVA vault. Provide UL listed 4" storz adapters with 30 degree downturn from horizontal on each FDC. See "Fire Department Connection Requirements" on Sheet C0.2. 6. Provide documentation that the MC-3500 water retention system can support the loads of fire department apparatus and point load for aerial outriggers. We've switched to an underground CMP detention tank. The facility can handle the fire apparatus & outrigger loads. See attached load analysis as provided by Contech Engineered Solutions. Thanks again for your review. We look forward to proceeding with this development as soon as possible. Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. Pedro DeGuzman, PE President TERRAFOR.MA DESIGN GROUP, INC.