Loading...
Ryan Etue Dentist-TIA.pdfE dfIo n d s IF ir-affi c &�,')Mys�s ftorks["'1�eetl N,Niimie of 111-oj)osed llvojed- - - - ------- 0vnawVAPpficvmt Aj)pficaiACoWao Pea-smr A ISI mm mama e ----------- - ------- Sti-eet/WiIiiig Addi'ess As: di-ess City St ;atc Zip City E; U1 tc Zip 1'0 1 ep 11 o )I C: 'reiepliorw: L Ti-affie 0.'Mghieei- w1go ptvpi-ed the Tniffie litil-met Awadysk (Kat)plieable)- Cibson Traffic Consultants, Inc Matthew Palmer 1"iJul Nali'le WAqet Name Telepl-totic: 425.339.8266 mattp_gtc@earthlink.net . .......... ........ .. . THRESHOLD LFVELS OF ANA.LYSIS Levek Sectiomos to Coiiiplete I mid '7 oifly (Woiksficct/Cheeldist) BI. , Mm -e than 25 per&-hooi- tiips goici-ated All sectio[is 1. PROJECTDESCRIPT1014 a, Locatimi -- Sb'eet address: 7.^° .. . . . . '61 . . ..... Iftich (I i lidfl it v ii i(q) a iid site plwi) Ca. Speci(y existiiif,? latid LlSe: 2,268 SF Fresh Vitamins - Shopping Center Specify pl'opw;ed type, alld size ofdevclopmellt: 2,268 SF Dental Office 71`11'? V d. Date construction will begin and be completed: Tenant Improvement - End 2012 e. Define proposed access locations: 2 Existing Accesses to Lake Ballinger Way f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: Access will not change No New Sight Distance Required 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT Shopping 64 Center 2 3 b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use PM Peak -Hour Daily (ADT) IN Trips OUT Medica -Dental OUT Medical -Dental Office $2 2 6 c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT Medical -Dental Office 18 0 3 d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: For Trip Generation, 340-. Pass -by per ITE Trip Generation Handbook was utilized for the Shopping Center. Revised on 6124110 E82 - Trajric hrrpacl Analysis Worksheel Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model. t 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DR VEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS 95% Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plait,) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department z Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department z Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of S LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Ject Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of S 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. PJ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfp, etc. X 2,268 X 2,268 Fee New Use Fee: $ 8, 6 41.0 8 _[Prior Use Fee: $ 2, 10 9. 21 ❑ NEVA DEVELOPMENT ITE Land. Use Category I per Unit Fee Rate New Use ❑ OTHER Units in square feet, pee # of dwelling, of , etc. X = $ TIGA'I'IO FEE RECOMMENDATION: ITE Land Use Category per Unit $ TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Fee Rate New Use (2009) $ 3,81 Prior Use [,,:,720 820 (2004) $ 0.93 Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfp, etc. X 2,268 X 2,268 Fee New Use Fee: $ 8, 6 41.0 8 _[Prior Use Fee: $ 2, 10 9. 21 ❑ NEVA DEVELOPMENT ITE Land. Use Category I per Unit Fee Rate New Use ❑ OTHER Units in square feet, pee # of dwelling, of , etc. X = $ TIGA'I'IO FEE RECOMMENDATION: INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 + consultant fee $ TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date ` No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6/24/10 E'82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 GTC Gibson Traffic Consulfanfs 2802 Wetmore Avenue Suite 220 Evereft, WA 98201 425.339.8266 Prepared for: Ryan Etue, DDS Submitted to: City of Edmonds April 2012 GTC # 12-04.6 lo Ryan Etue, DDS Trip Generation & Mitigation Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS 1, DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION................................................................................... 1 2. TRIP GENERATION.............................................................................................................. 2 3. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES...................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Trip Generation Summary............................................................................................... 2 Table 2: Traffic Mitigation Fee Calculation.................................................................................. 3 ATTACHMENTS Trip Generation Calculations .................................................. A Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC # 12-046 i Ryan Etue, DDS Trip Generation & Mitigation Memorandum 1. DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION Gibson Traffic Consultants (GTC) has been retained to analyze the traffic impacts of the proposed tenant improvement of Ryan Etue, DDS medical -dental office. GTC is a professional traffic engineering consulting firm registered and licensed in the State of Washington. This study has been organized in the manner of the SEPA Traffic Impact Requirements for the City of Edmonds for developments generating less than 25 PM peak -hour trips. GTC is located at: 2802 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 220 Everett, WA 98201 Phone: 425-339-8266 Fax: 425-258-2922 Email: info@gibsontraffic.com Matthew Palmer, responsible for this report and traffic analysis, is a licensed professional engineer (Civil) in the State of Washington and member of the Washington State section of ITE. The proposed Ryan Etue, DDS tenant improvement will consist of replacing 2,268 Square Feet (SF) of the previous shopping center with 2,268 SF of dental office. The remaining 1,273 SF will remain as shopping center. The site address is: 8129 Lake Ballinger Way, Suite 101 Edmonds, WA 98026 The proposed tenant improvement is anticipated to be operational at the end of 2012. The property currently is served by the existing accesses on to Lake Ballinger Way. No change in access is proposed. Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC #12-046 1 Ryan Etuc, DDS Trip Generation & Mitigation Memorandum 2. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation rates were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition (2008). The average trip generation rates for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 820, shopping center, and ITE LUC 720, medical -dental office, have been used for the trip generation calculations. Industry standard pass -by rate of 34% for shopping center has been applied to the trip generation based on the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. This pass -by reduction has been applied to the daily, AM peak -hour and PM peak -hour trip generation calculations. The 2,268 SP of tenant improvement is anticipated to generate 18 net new ADT, with 4 net new AM peak -hour trips (3 inbound/1 outbound) and 3 net new PM peak -hour trips (0 inbound/3 outbound). The trip generation is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Trip Generation Summary The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC #12-046 2 Average AM Peak -Hour Trips PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Size Daily Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Trips Shopping 2,268 SF -64 -1 0 -1 -2 -3 -5 Center Medical -Dental 2,268 SF 82 4 1 5 2 6 8 Office Total Net New Trips 18 3 1 4 0 3 3 The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC #12-046 2 Ryan Etue, DDS Trip Generation & Mitigation Memorandum 3. 'TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Traffic impact mitigation payments to the City of Edmonds are based on Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4, Impact Fee Rates. The table that was adopted in 2004 when the development was permitted in 2005 had a mitigation rate for shopping center for the existing credit and the new use of medical -dental office will use the mitigation table adopted in 2009. The traffic mitigation fee calculation for the Ryan Etue, DDS tenant improvement is summarized in Table 2. The total traffic mitigation fee of $6,531.84 is required. Table 2: Traffic Mitigation Fee Calculation Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC # 12-046 3 Number Trip Trip Net New Trips Impact Fee Land Use of Units Rate New Length per Unit of per Unit Tata[ Tris Factor Measure Shopping Center -2,268 SF 3.74 81% 0.4 1.21 per 1,000 SF $0.93 per SF -$2,109.24 Credit Medical 2,268 SF 3.46 75% 1.4 3.63 per 1,000 SF $3.81 per SF $8,641.08 Office Total --- --- --- --- --- --- $6,531.84 Gibson Traffic Consultants April 2012 GTC # 12-046 3 .:. 1 E 1 A ro a m ae CD v W M Y i A-1 O L L C U w 3 -r - A-2 ❑© N N LU It cU H C A-3