S-05-64 comments prior to recording.pdf
CE
ITY OF DMONDS
PLANREVIEWCOMMENTS
PLANNINGDIVISION
425.771.0220
DATE: September 30, 2008
TO: Phillip Lehn
plehn@comcast.net
FROM: Kathleen Taylor, Associate Planner
RE: S-2005-64
CORRECTIONS TO FINAL RECORD DOCUMENT
On behalf of the Planning Division, I have reviewed the draft final record documents for
S-2005-64, a two lot subdivision. Jaime Hawkins is the Engineer reviewing the
document. He has been out sick most of this week, so additional comments may be
forthcoming. Please respond to the following revisions:
1.Setbacks. The document as submitted states, ‘Setbacks from critical areas
steep slope which have been reduced to 10 feet were vested with the original
short plat’s recording.’Actually, the setbacks from the original subdivision
donot vest. Since ultimately another lot is being added to the original short
plat, additional impact to the slope is highly probable. Instead, remove the
statement, and add, ‘Setbacks shown are for reference only and vest no right.’
2.Dedications. Dedication number 4 states the purpose of Tracts EX and DX.
Please add to the final sentence so that it reads, ‘Their purpose shall be to
provide a landscaped open space for the enjoyment of their owners and are
not developable.’
3.Conditions. The document states, ‘A copy of said document is located in files
2-2006-64…’ Please change it to read, ‘A copy of said document is located in
file S-2005-64…’
4.Engineering Signature Block. Add a signature block for the Engineering
Division.
5.Topography. Show the topography for the subject area, and top and toe of
slope(s), as was shown on the document for preliminary approval. Also
include the line 50’ from the toe of slope, for the toe which is shown
horizontally across lot E; the 50’ line falling across lot D. Refer to page 8 of
AMEC’s 4/27/05 report.
6.Exterior lot lines. It appears that three quit claim deeds were recorded for the
property on 9/9/2008, thus changing the exterior property lines. The exterior
property lines cannot be changed prior to the recording of S-2005-64. The
quit claim deeds need to be retracted. The exterior lot lines must comply with
what was submitted for preliminary approval. Furthermore, it appears that
those exterior lot lines do not completely correspond to what was recorded for
the lot line adjustment, file number LL-2002-157. I did not see any obvious
explanations when researching Snohomish County record documents, but
perhaps I missed something.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 425.771.0220.
Thanks.