Loading...
S-06-146 Comments on 2nd Draft Recording Documents.pdf CE th ITY OF DMONDS • 1215 AN•E,WA98020 VENUE ORTH DMONDS P: 425.771.0220 • F: 425.771.0221 • W: www.edmondswa.gov HONEAXEB DSD: P•E•B EVELOPMENT ERVICES EPARTMENTLANNING NGINEERING UILDING DATE: July 25, 2012 TO: Mr. Carmen Crispeno Email: Crispeno@juno.com FROM: Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner – Development Services Department Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager – Public Works Department ND RE: COMMENTS ON 2 DRAFT RECORDING DOCUMENTS FOR CRISPENO SHORT PLAT, FILE NO. PLN20060146 Dear Mr. Crispeno: The Planning and Engineering Divisions have reviewed the above draft recording documents submitted on July 11, 2012, and it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications will need to be addressed before review can continue: 1.Our letter dated July 2, 2012 requested a cover letter addressing how all of the conditions of the th preliminary short plat approval have been met. Your July 11 submittal included a cover letter nd addressing the review comments of our July 2 letter, but it did not address how all of the conditions of the preliminary short plat approval (including the conditions of the modification request) have been met. Please provide such letter. 2.The draft recording document submittal still does not meet the Snohomish County Auditor's recording requirements, particularly in regards to the minimum required margins. The Auditor's office will not record the final documents unless they meet all recording requirements. As such, be sure that the final set is printed consistent with the County Auditor's requirements, which are available for your reference via the following link: http://www1.co.snohomish.wa.us/Departments/Auditor/Divisions/Recording/. 3.Thank you for adding the requested statement under the “Declaration of Subdivision Covenants” heading on Sheet 1; however, the word “free” was left out of the statement. Please update the statement as follows: “We certify that we are the legal owners of interest in the property herein described, and we hereby certify that this subdivision, with the declarations and conditions contained herein, is made of our free consent and according to our desires.” 4.Sheet 2 indicates dashed lines for all existing and proposed easements; however, easement labels are not provided on this sheet. Please provide abbreviated labels for all of the existing and proposed easements on Sheet 2, including those stated within the “Notes” section. Additionally, add a note to the “Notes” section on Sheet 2 stating the following: “Easements shown within the subject subdivision are privately owned and maintained. Further detail can be found on Sheet 3.” 5.Within the easement details on Sheet 3, be sure to indicate the distances and bearings of all line segments of the easements. 6.It does not appear as though all new easements have been specified correctly. For example, there are portions of the new storm line that fall within the boundaries of Lot 3, which is not covered by a new easement. Likewise, portions of the new sewer fall outside the proposed utility easement on Lot 1. Please confirm that all new easements shown are consistent with utility locations as shown on the as- builts. The examples provided within this comment may not be all inclusive. Page 1 of 2 7.The previous version of the private easement language (from your draft recording documents submitted on May 23, 2012) included language such as “maintenance, operation, repair, and/or reconstruction...” The new version only specifies maintenance. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the easement ownership and maintenance responsibilities are stated in a manner that will nd prevent future conflict between property owners. Example language was provided in our July 2 comment letter, which you may find helpful. nd 8.As stated in our July 2 comment letter, a power easement must be provided near the northeastern corner of Lot 1 / northwestern corner of Lot 2 to provide for the existing power pole. Although it was indicated on Sheet 3 that the existing power pole is located within the private ingress, egress, and utility easement on the northern side of Lot 1, it is unknown if the power lines running from the power pole to the respective parcel(s) are also located within this easement. If there is a power line running across Lot 1 to serve Lot 2, for instance, then an easement shall be provided for such. It may be clearer to provide a separate easement for the power utility system. 9.On Sheet 3, revise the label for the new access and utility easement along the western sides of Lots 1 and 3 to specify that it is a private easement. Additionally, the existing lot to the south of Lot 3 shall be included as a beneficiary of the new portion of the ingress, egress easement. However, the existing lot to the south of Lot 3 should not be stated as a beneficiary of the utility portion of this easement. It may be clearer to provide separate utility and ingress/egress easements. The maintenance provisions should also be revised to reflect ownership and responsibility. 10.Thank you for correcting the discrepancies between the lengths of the property line segments as indicated on the map and as written in the legal descriptions. It was noted, however, that the directions for bearings are not consistent between the map and the legal descriptions. In addition, the bearings alternate directions between the line segments as shown on the map. For instance, the legal description for Lot 1 (starting at the NW corner of Lot 1) begins with a SE bearing direction. The next line segment runs NW, the segment after that also runs NW, and the segment after that runs SE. Please correct the recording documents so that all bearings are written in the same direction and are consistent between the map and the legal descriptions. 11.Please add the following note to the “Notes” section on Sheet 2: “The subject site contains and/or is adjacent to critical areas, including a Landslide Hazard Area. Therefore, work on the site is subject to the applicable critical areas regulations of ECDC 23.40 and 23.80, or as amended. A geotechnical report for work within the Landslide Hazard Area and/or its buffer may be required.” 12.The final recording documents must be signed by your surveyor. 13.Note that all signatures on the final documents must be made in black ink. However, you may wish to submit the revised documents to staff for another review prior to obtaining all required signatures. Please make the above changes and submit your updated recording documents to a Planner, Monday through Friday between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM. In addressing the above comments please keep in mind that preliminary short plat approval will expire on August 17, 2012 (five years from date of decision on motion for reconsideration) if final approval is not granted prior to expiration. It is strongly recommended that you respond to all comments no later than July 30, 2012 in order to provide time to review the revisions and complete any pending requirements. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Machuga or Jeanie McConnell at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at Machuga@ci.edmonds.wa.us or Mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections. Cc: File No. PLN20060146 Page 2 of 2