S-63-02.pdf4
c50
f/J
4
c50
4
1963..
February 1 90 1963
Mr. Thomas V. Messer
lie
L dmond , Wazhiugt an
Eea' Mr, Nessera
The Edn.anls Pring Cr fission, at heir regular veeti, of Abruary 18X
1963y gRpraved your Subdivision request$ We Mo. S -2-63a subject NO
pray sian of an additional Jo feet along the South edge of Cascado Lanex,
and the provision of a 40 -foot turn around at the end of Cascade Lane.o
also, that the 5 -foot strip and the turnaround be paved.
Vory truly YOVxSS.
Secretary
MOKS Planning Chi sla
January 23, 1963
Mr. Thomas V. Messer
747 Olympic Avenue
fonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Messer:
T wish to advise you that the Edmonds Planning C.oAmission, at their
regular meeting of January 21, 1963, denied your request for Sub-
divisions Pile No. S-2-63, until more adequate information is
furnished the Manning Commission, including property drawings
designating right of way and drainages as stipulated by the City
Engineer.
x
Yours very truly,
Secretary
r
PUalNING CO[MUSSION APPLICATION
REZONING .-- SUBDIVISION -
J' -,-,7_
PEE 2J2 -z: --
RECEIPT
2 -
RECEIPT NO -
DATE /
D�WIE THOMAS V. MESSER L Alin,
ADDRESS 747 OLYMPIC AvENUa~
EDMONDS PHONE PR 6-065
By... - ---- Date ---- w.. ------ ---
REQUEST THAT APPROVAL BE GRANTED ALLOWING A 4 -LAT SUBDIVI ''ION OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
TRACT 14 PUGET SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT 5 -ACRE TRACTS, EXCEPT, REPLT
OF SUNSET ESTATES AND EXCEPT PORTION LYING'NORTHERLY OF CASCADE LANE,
SKETCH: (Sketch of property to be rezoned. or subdivided showing streets.,
property lines, etc.)
(SEE ATTACHED)
SCALE: 1" = 50 MET
JAWAP.Y $, 1963
m I
M
WDDLETaW ASSOCIATES
Cortsulfinp, Dgineers &Laid Sur veyon
324 Main St. PR 8-1171
WASHINOTON
MID
LAS
J.
WDDLETaW ASSOCIATES
Cortsulfinp, Dgineers &Laid Sur veyon
324 Main St. PR 8-1171
WASHINOTON
MID
LAS
ti`�e3F��
REED, MIDDLETON ASSOCIATES
Qf1'(!InEt!3EEfSA11(iiU8Qf3
324 Main St PR 8-117 ��r���
May 29, 1963
To: Edmonds Planning Commission
From; John E. Moran
Superintendent of Public Works
Re: File No. S-2-63
Thomas V. Messer Subdivision
The above -captioned subdivision has been examined by the undersigned
in the company of Mr. LeRoy Middleton of Reid, Middleton & Associates.
After careful study of this subdivision, it is respectfully recommended
that the ten -foot dedication asked for by the Planning Commission at the
time of approval of this subdivision be reduced to 8 feet, five of which
will be paved as per original stipulation.
No recommendations are made for any further changes or deviations in this
subdivision.
JEM:mb
r
(may^"
Mo
n
Edmonds City Council
Edmonds, ,iashington
Gentlemen:
I am writing you with respect to the attached letter that I have
received from the Edmonds Planning Commission.
I humbly request your consideration of their proposed recommendations
with regard to my request for dividing my property into our (4) lots.
Last year -the city re -surveyed properties along Olympic Avenue that
resulted in my north property line being moved ten (10) feet south of
the old established boundary, this put my house within 10 feet of Cascade
Lane. I did not contest this move because it allowed me amply room for
my furnace oil tank and a walk to my backyard and garbage can rack.
Since receipt of the attached letter from, the Planning Commission,
I requested that Mr. Middleton survey my property and stake lot boundary
lanes - this has been done.
I, now find. that my north property line is staked within inches of
nay house - eliminating my oil tank and walk.
Cascade Lane is an access road to two (2) recently built houses and
with the addition of .rry two (2) lots would provide access to four (4)
homes. It is not a through street nor does it conform to any specific
and/or required width, so I can not understand the Planning Commission's
recommendation that I cede ten (10) feet of my property and that I pave
five (5) feet of same, nor does.my logical reasoning explain the
requirement that I cede and pave a 40 foot turn around..
j I would be willing to cede five (5) feet along Cascade Lane south
edge, but I feel that any other recommendation is unjustifiable and
would entail a great expense to me for a requirement that is not needed
by present and/or future users of Cascade Lane.
Should houses be built on rW proposed two (2) lots, the builder
would decide where driveways should be placed to Cascade Lane - this
would not necessitate the need for a turn around.
I am sorry that my military duties preclude my being able to appear
before you in person.
MW sincere thanks -to you gentlemn, for any consideration you may
give xrj request.
Respect lly yours,
f•
1 Incl
Letter from City of Edmonds
Planning Commission
K
Civic CENTER '
VIM Av MUM M.
1 LL � F Gpr
AND EDMONGB eY. ry.•,a G " ,l