SEPA.pdf
#P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determiningif there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may
exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of
the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be
read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A.BACKGROUND
244th St.
1.Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC
2.Name of applicant:
3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Applicant: 11611 Airport Road, Suite B-1, Everett, WA 98204 - (425) 212-2490
Contact: Brian Kalab, P.E. / Insight Engineering Company - P.O. Box 1478, Everett, WA 98206 - (425) 303-9363
4.Date checklist prepared:
February 13, 2017
5.Agency requesting checklist:
City of Edmonds
Revisedon9/16/16SEPAPage 1of 27
Construction would start upon receipts of all
6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable
):
necessary development, building and grading permits.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7.Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
There are no plans for future expansion at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8.List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
A full drainage report and critical areas study will be submitted along with this Environmental Checklist.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9.Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
There are no known applications pending at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 2of 27
10.List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Building permits by City of Edmonds
SEPA Determination by City of Edmonds
Grading permits by City of Edmonds
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11.Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The proposal is for 11 new townhome units on approximately 0.88 acres.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12.Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, youare not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
The property is located at 8609 244th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98206
Located in the SW 1/4, SEC 31, T.27N, R.04E, W.M.
Tax Account #: 00463303100103
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 3of 27
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B.ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1.Earth
a.General description of the site(circle one):
Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Less than 8%
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term
commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.
Alderwood-Urban land complex as per the soil conservation service soil survey of Snohomish
County.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d.Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 4of 27
e.Describe the purpose, type, total areaand approximate quantitiesand total affected areaof any filling,
excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Road and buildings sites would be cleared, graded and compacted as necessary to achieve proper grading transition,
drainage and structural stability. Approximately 1,092 CY of material will be cut, and 1,220 CY will be used for fill.
The source of fill will be suitable fill imported from an on-site material or legal source.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f.Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Yes, the potential for on-site erosion will increase in the short term where soils are exposed during site
preparation and construction.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g.About what percent ofthe site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 73.3% of the site would be covered by residential buildings, roads, driveways and site
impervious surface.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h.Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
A temporary erosion sedimentation control plan (TESCP) will be submitted to the city for approval prior to any
construction activities. Construction phase erosion control will include the use of silt fences, hay bales, and catch basin
protection as necessary to minimize the impacts of erosion on off-site areas and on-site systems.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2.AIR
a.What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Short Term Construction Impacts: Short-term emissions and odors would result from site preparation and construction activities. Sources of short-term
emissions and odors include dust generated by grading activities and combustion emissions from heavy equipment. It is anticipated that these impacts
would be minimal.
Long-Term Air Quality Impacts: Long-term impacts would result from increased traffic to the site, resulting in a slight increase in carbon monoxide levels.
Domestically produced pollutants would be generated after the residential structures are occupied. These impacts are not expected to be significant.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 5of 27
b.Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, ifany:
Construction Impact Mitigation: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available and reasonable means of controlling air pollution,
including dust. Construction impacts would not be significant and the potential for soils to be carried off the site by exiting trucks could be controlled
with the construction of a gravel entrance. Additionally, equipment used for site preparation will be serviced and maintained in good operating condition
to lessen impacts from this source. Water will also be used for dust control when necessary.
Long-Term Air Quality Mitigation: Long-term air quality impacts are no expected to exceed regulated amounts.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3.WATER
a.Surface:
(1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
No wetlands on site; N/A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 6of 27
(4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
Waste materials would not be discharged into surface waters as a result of these projects. It is possible that
discharges of petroleum products and other substances related to automobiles from the parking areas could result
from the surface flow of stormwater. However, implementation of the drainage plan would minimize this occurence
by providing water quality in the stormwater drainage facilities.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Ground:
(1)Will ground water be withdrawnfrom a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a
general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well
Willwater be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 7of 27
(2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
The project would be served by Olympic View Water District for sanitary sewer services. No waste
material would be discharged from spetic tanks or other sources.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1)Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Run-off from proposed impervious surfaces would be collected via conveyance systems with
roadside and detained. The run-off will be discharged into the existing surface water conveyance
systems (i.e. pipes, ditches, etc). For run-off volume, pipe and detention sizing please refer to
the civil plan, reports, and calculations.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Oil, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas could potentially enter the ground or downstream surface
waters through surface water run-off. Implementation of the proposed water quality features of the detailed drainage
plan will remove most waste materials, as consistent with stormwater management requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3)Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity ofthe site? If so,
describe.
No, the proposal does not alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 8of 27
d.Proposed measuresto reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage patternimpacts, if
any:
Temporary and permanent drainage facilities meeting City limited existing native vegetation consisting of
trees, groundcover and grass. State standards would be employed to control surface water runoff
during construction and after development.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
4.Plants
a.Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
_______________________________________________
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:___________________________________________________
shrubs
_____________________________________________________________________________
grass_______________________________________________________________________________
pasture_____________________________________________________________________________
crop or grain________________________________________________________________________
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops __________________________________________
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
___________________________
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:__________________________________________
other types of vegetation:______________________________________________________________
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Limited existing native vegetation consisting of trees, groundcover and grass.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 9of 27
c.List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d.Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
All areas, exclusive of buildings and parking, will be landscaped by subsequent owners/occupants.
Hydroseeding may possibly occur on barren areas per County requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e.List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
No noxious weeds or invasive species known to be on or near the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5.Animals
a.Listany birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near
the site. Examples include:
Crows and Robins
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
____________________________________________________
Rodents and Squirrels
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:_______________________________________________________
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:________________________________________________
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 10of 27
(STAFF COMMENTS)______________________________________________________________________
b.List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
All of Western Washington is located in the Pacific Flyaway. The site is not a significant factor in the
Pacific Flyaway.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d.Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e.List any invasiveanimalspecies known to be on or near the site.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 11of 27
6.Energy and Natural Resources
a.What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
At the time of completion of development: Electricity for lighting, as well as electricity and/or natural gas
would be used for heating.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No effect.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
At the time of construction, the requirements of the International Building Code would be satisfied in the
construction of the residential buildings. Energy conserving materials would be utilized wherever possible
throughout the construction process.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7.Environmental Health
a.Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
The project would not create any environmental health hazards.
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 12of 27
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1)Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
No known or possible contamination at the site from past or present uses.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2)Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design.
This includes undergroundhazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the
project area and in the vicinity.
No known existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect the project development and
design of this property.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3)Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the
Fuel will be used during the project's development, construction and at any time during the operating
life of the project.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(4)Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Hazardous waste cleanup of any fuel spillage associated with construction of this proposal.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 13of 27
(5)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
At the time of construction, the project site would adhere to the Contractor's Safety Plan and Program.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Noise
(1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Traffic on existing roads near the site would be audible. There are no other sources of noise that
will affect this project.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example:
would come from the site.
Short term noise impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during daylight hours.
Construction noise is generated by heavy equipment, hand tools and the transporting of construction
equipment. Long term impacts would be those associated with increase of site users and
additional traffic. The increase in noise would be typical of surrounding single family residences.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
At the time, construction would comply with the City of Edmonds noise ordinance.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 14of 27
8.Land and Shoreline Use
a.Whatis the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on
nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The site is currently developed with 3 single family homes. The development pattern of the areas to the
north, west and south are single family residential in Shoreline. There are 3 condos to the east
containing 6 units each.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.How much
agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result
of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest
land tax status will be converted to nonfarmor nonforest use?
To our knowledge, the site has not been used for agriculture.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business
operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If
so, how:
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Describe any structures on the site.
The site is currently developed with three single family homes.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 15of 27
d.Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
All existing structures will be demolished.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e.What is the current zoning classification of the site?
RM 2.4
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f.What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Multi-Family, High Density
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g.If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
N/A
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
h.Has any part of the site been classified criticalareaby the city? If so, specify.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 16of 27
i.Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
2.7 per residence = 11x2.7=29.7
(STAFF COMMENTS)
j.Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
To our knowledge, no people will be displaced.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k.Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
l.Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
The project will be controlled by City of Edmonds zoning requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
m.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial
significance, if any:
N/A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 17of 27
9.Housing
a.Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
At the time of development, the project's proposal would provide 11 new, middle income, townhome units.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
3 middle income units will be eliminated.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10.Aesthetics
a.What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
The residential structures would comply with the height requirements of the City of Edmonds code.
The exterior structures would be principally wood and masonry.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 18of 27
b.What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The finished project would not obstruct the surrounding view; however, the view would be altered due to
the development of the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The development design and appearance of the proposed project would be compatible with other uses in
the area. Lot landscaping would be designed to complement the structures and site layout. Native
vegetation would be retained and enhanced where practical.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11.Light and Glare
a.What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Light and glare would mainly be produced by exterior and interior residential lighting during evening hours
and vehicle headlights traveling to and from the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Light from the finished project would not interfere with the views or cause hazards. Exterior lighting would
be typical of a residenital neighborhood.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No off-site sources of light or glare would affect this proposal.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 19of 27
d.Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None proposed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12.Recreation
a.What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
City parks, golf courses, playgrounds at school facilities, boating and water related activities are available
in the area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
None are displaced.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Park mitigation fees in accordance with City of Edmonds code totals are offered by the applicant.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 20of 27
13.Historic and Cultural Preservation
a.Are there any buildings, structures, or siteslocated onor near the site that are over 45 years old listed in,
or eligible forlisting innational, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specificallydescribe.
There are no known areas reserved for preservation.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Are there any landmarks, features,orotherevidence ofIndian or historic use or occupation? This may
include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural
importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such
resources.
There are no known archeological artifacts on the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the
project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic
Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc.
N/A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d.Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources.
Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
This project would not adversly affect any historical resources, therefore, no mitigation of impacts are
being proposed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 21of 27
14.Transportation
a.Identify public streets and highways serving the siteor affected geographic area, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site fronts, and will take access from, 244th St.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Isthe site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not,
what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
The site is currently served by public transit 0.1 miles away at 244th St. SW & Whitman Ave. N.
(Stop #1710)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c.How manyadditionalparking spaces would the completed projector nonproject proposalhave? How
many would the project or proposal eliminate?
2 parking spaces per residence: 11x2=22 new parking spaces
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d.Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads,streets,pedestrian, bicycle or state
transportation facilitiesnot including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private).
The proposal will not require any new public roads.
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 22of 27
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e.Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f.How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occurand what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and
passengervehicles).What data or transportationmodels were used to make these estimates?
9.52 ADT x 11 (new) units = 104.72 ADT
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g.Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products
on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h.Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
The development would be required to pay traffic mitigation fees. Payment will be made to the City of
Edmonds for traffic mitigation fees.
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 23of 27
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15.Public Services
a.Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Yes; however, the level is not expected to be significant.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
Proposal will generate new tax revenue. Payment to the Edmonds School District for school mitigation fees
Park mitigation fees and traffic mitigation fees as required by code.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
16.Utilities
a.Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 24of 27
Electricity: Snohomish County PUD
Gas: Puget Sound Energy
Water & Sewer: Olympic View Water and Sewer District
Telephone: Frontier Communications / Cable Television: Comcast
Refuse: Waste Management
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C.SIGNATURE
I declare under penalty of perjury laws that theabove answers are true and correctto the best of my knowledge. I understand
that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Signature of ProponentDate Submitted
Revised on 9/19/16SEPAPage 25of 27
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,
would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 26 of 27
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 27 of 27