SEPA_Checklist.pdfPurpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
Land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
NOTE: Projects generating new traffic will be required to submit a Traffic Study prepared by a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
Specific requirements for the Traffic Study may vary depending upon the project, and will be provided by the City Engineer upon
request. Please contact the Engineering Division at 425-771-3202 for specific study requirements. City review of the Traffic Study
may require assessment of the "Development Project Peer Review" fee of $45 plus the cost of the review.
Use of cheeklist.for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 50 Pine Street
2.
3.
Name of applicant: Pine Street, LLC
Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 107, Seattle, WA 98121
Contact: Matt Parent, 206.215.9734
*See list of attachments following this checklist
Page t of'24
soya checklist - pablicdoet2.10.2004
4. Date checklist prepared: January, 29, 2013
S. Agency requesting checklist: Cid offdmonds
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Site work & construction 2013-2014
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
None are planned.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal*
Phase 1 permit (2008) for 162,583 square foot structure; DOE MTCA letter of compliance (2003): SEPA checklist prepared in December 2002
by Point Edwards LLC; Conditions, Recommendations, & Request For Consideration Report for Edmonds Unocal Tank Farm & Pt. Edwards
Greenbelt Forest (2002); SEPA checklist prepared February 2002 by Unocal Corporation. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared
by City of Edmonds May, 1995; Draft EIS (DEIS) prepared for prospective development of "Edmonds Crossing" at adjacent site (1995);
The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife (1995); RCW197-11-965 Adoption Notice (2005).
*See Attachment A for list of additional environmental documents related to subject and adjacent properties.
(STAFF COMMENTS),
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 2 of 24
sepa checklist, publie.d=2, 10.209.1
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Architectural Design Board approval; critical areas assessment & steep slope exemption;
grading and building permits.
(STAFF COMMENTS
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Proposed development at 91,418 square foot lot includes approximately 116,500 sf of building
construction built into hillside with 85-89 residential units and 144 parking stalls (parking at sub -grade
garage and surface). Landscaping and landscape elements will extend from the building footprint to the
property line, creating private and common area spaces. See attached site plan for additional information.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Site address: 50 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020. Subject site is located at the southern portion of the
former Unocal tank farm facility south of downtown Edmonds. The lot is surrounded by Pine Street on
west, north, and east sides; the south property line borders the city of Woodway. Legal description:
PARCEL III OF CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING
NO. 8101160175, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT
LOT 1 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26,
TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. See also attached civil site plan, zoning & vicinity maps.
(STAFF COMMENTS) _
Page 3 of 24
septi checklist - public.doc:2.10,2004
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Hilly with flat areas.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Limited areas have a slope of approximately forty-five percent.
(STAFF COMMENTS}
C. 'What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Aide rwood-Eve rett gravelly sandy loam, Kitsap silt loam, dense silt, and hard clay.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 4 of 24
wpa checklist-pub6c.dQc2.IrJ.200i
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
Grading, cutting, and filling is necessary to construct building foundation (including sub -grade
parking garage) and will also be required for surface parking and landscape elements (@ private
& amenity areas, etc.). Cut is estimated at roughly 21,000 CY; fill at roughly 250 CY (all from site).
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Some surface erosion is possible during site preparation and building construction; no erosion
anticipated upon completion of the development.
(STAFF COMMENTS}
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately seventy-five percent.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
It. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Temporary erosion and sediment control plan will include Best Management Practices and other
measures required by the City during construction. Stormwater management plan will include
Best Management Practices & other measures required by the City to control erosion.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. AIR
What types of emissions to the air would result front the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Dust and equipment emissions will occur during construction; Automobile emissions will occur
at completion of project.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 5 of 24
sr,a checklist - public.doc_2. 10.2004
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
None known.
(S'T'AFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
Compliance with air quality regulations. Water will be sprayed on exposed soils as needed to
reduce dust. Rock entrances to the site will be constructed. Streets will be washed as needed.
(STAFF COMMENTS) —
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Edmonds Marsh lies northeast of the site. A class 3 wetland is located north of the site.
The Willow Creek riparian corridor runs through the Deer Creek fish hatchery which is located
northeast of the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)—,.--
Page
OMMENTS),._
Page G of 24
cepa checklist - pablieAoc; .10.2004
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No ground water will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to ground water.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 7 of 24
sepa checklist • public,do,2.10.2004
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Development will be connected to the public sewer system.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Source of runoff will be stormwater. Runoff will be collected using a system of roof drains,
area drains, and catch basins, and conveyed by pipe to the public storm sewer in Pine Street.
This storm sewer discharges flow to an onsite wet pond providing treatment prior to release
to the down stream receiving system that flows to Puget Sound
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
It is unlikely that waste materials could enter ground or surface waters.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Drainage design will be in accordance with Chapter 18.30 of the Edmonds Community Development
Code and with the City's 4/20/10 Stormwater Code Supplement. As with prior phases of this development,
stormwater flow control (detention) is not needed since all site runoff indirectly discharges to Puget Sound, a
designated receiving water. Stormwater treatment will be provided by the existing wetpond constructed with
the first phase of Point Edwards. Adequacy of wet pond volume will be verified
as part of this project. If necessary, the pond will either be enlarged or additional treatment facilities
(e.g.: Stormfilters) will be installed onsite to accommodate the project in accordance with current standards.
(STAFF COMMENTS).
Page 8 of 24
sopa checMim - public.doc.2. t 0.2004
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple aspen, other: birch, ash, cherry
X evergreen tree: ir, cedar ine. other. Sitka spruce
X shrub, vine maple, Scot's broom, English ivy, Indian plum, blackberry, thistleberry, salmonberr
Bras rc and grass, fescues, velvetgrass, woodrush, timothy, bluegrass, bear rass
pasture
crop or grain
X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, othe . urple loosestrife
water plants: water lily, celgrass, milfoil, other:
X other types of vegetation:
The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife
(attached) includes a detailed listing of plant species, some of which might be found on this site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Any vegetation on the portion of the site proposed for development will be removed.
(STAFF COMMENTS}
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known. The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife
does not note the presence of any threatened or endangered plant species on the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 9 of 24
sepa eheck3ist putilio_dvc; 3.I@?603
Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
See attached preliminary plant schedule and site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
X birds: hawk heron, eagle, songbirds other crow seagull swallows wrens sparrows woodpecker
X mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels
X fish: bass, salmon, trout erring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife indicates
that Willow Creek, off site, at the east and north has a small run of coho salmon as a result of
plantings made at the Deer Creek Fish Hatchery. Stray chum salmon and cutthroat trout have
also been observed. Bald eagles were observed perched in nearby trees, but no eagle
nests were observed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The site is part of the Western Flyway for migratory birds (as is most of Western Washington)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 10 of24
sta cbeckIist - pub] ic,Aa:2.I0.2004
Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
See the attached preliminary planting schedule/site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Natural gas and electricity will be used for heating and appliances.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
Proposal would not prohibit potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. Affect if any
beyond existing topography, vegetation, and structures to the south would be negligible.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Washington State Residential Energy Code requires that all multiple residence buildings contain
energy conservation measures. Additionally, fenestration and landscape strategies will be
incorporated allowing for passive solar benefits.
(STAFF COIi MENTS)
Page ll of24
sepa chaklis� - pubtic.doc:'.10.2C0 i
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
The Point Edwards site was used for storage and transfer of petroleum products which resulted in
contamination of the property. See attached D.O.E. compliance letter, confirming cleanup
requirements were met.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services are anticipated.
(STAFF COMMENTS
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Action plan submitted and approved by Ecology in 2001 leading to Unocal's voluntary removal
of tanks and lines on site and removal of plume contamination on lower portion of the
Unocal property to the north of the project site. Plan called for complete cleanup of the project
site consistent with regulations under MTCA. As noted above, compliance letter is attached.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) 'What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example; traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Noise typically found in urban/suburban residential neighborhoods which will not affect
the project.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 12of24
sqa aheckliai ^ publicdoc.?. I0.?4tN
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
Short term: construction noise created by the project during work hours.
Long term: Automobile noise from residents' vehicles would occur.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Those consistent with City regulations. During construction, use of muffler systems and
equipment in good repair; adherence to normal construction hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is vacant. Properties to the south are single family residences. Properties to the west,
north, and east are occupied by multifamily structures.
(S'T'AFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS}
Page 13 of 24
scga checklist - pubtic.duc2,10.2004
c. Describe any structures on the site.
There are no structures on site with the exception of a boulder retaining wall along the south
property line.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
MP1,
(STAFF COMMENTS
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Master Plan Development.
(STAFF COMMENTS
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
Not applicable.
(STAFF CO
Page 14 of 24
sopa
It. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
Limited portions of the topography at north end of the property have a slope of approximately forty-
five percent. Issues with steep slope, if any, will be addressed with retaining wall, grading,
landscaping, and drainage strategies.
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Based on the regional average of 2.2 persons per household, approximately 187-196 people
would reside at the project.
(STAFF CO
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None are needed.
(STA FF C OM
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing an(] projected land uses and plaits, if
any:
Compliance with the City of Edmonds Master Plan approved for the site and zoning regulations.
Page 15 of24
checklist - put, I ic,,h,c:2.M2004
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Approximately 85-89 units of middle and high-income housing would be provided.
(STAFF CO
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None are needed.
(STAFF COMMENTS
10, Aesthetics
it, Wbat is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is (be principle
exterior building materials) proposed?
Structure with articulated roof/facade will be a maximum of 40' high from average historic grade.
Principle exterior cladding to be painted fiber cement (lap siding) similar to adjacent structures.
STAFFCOMMENTS)I;'e
"A A
Page 16 ol'24
sqa chcckfii - publi,&c2A0.2004
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
View of the hillside from adjacent buildings, marina area, and downtown Edmonds would be
altered; view from single family residence to the south would be altered.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Modulated facade/roofline. Landscaping will surround all sides of building; vegetation & trellis
elements will screen building & surface parking. Materials, modulation, & color to be analogous to
those found at existing Pt. Edwards buildings and home to the south.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Site and building lighting would occur during evening hours. Glare from residential windows could
occur during late afternoon and early evening hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
It is unlikely glare would be a safety hazard. Impacts glare might have on views would not be
unlike those at adjacent development and structures.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Those typical at urban/suburban neighborhoods (street lights, sun glare reflecting off adjacent
building windows, lighting at adjacent buildings). Afternoon or evening glare from Puget Sound
might affect units at the west end of the site.
(STAFF COMM
Page 17 of 24
sepa chedlisa - public.doc::.1 02004
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Lighting will be in accordance with City standards. On-site lighting would be low intensity and
shielded or directed downward. Building orientation, landscaping elements, and shading devices
will help to mitigate daytime glare. m
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Amenity areas are proposed at all floors of the building and at east end of the site. A city park is
located approximately 1/2 mile to the east. Edmonds public beaches and waterfront parks can
be found within a 1/2 mile radius to the west and northwest.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Fitness and gathering rooms occur within the building and will incorporate construction methods
to help isolate sound. Outdoor amenity area will be screened by existing and modified topography,
landscaping, and other landscape elements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 18 of24
cepa checklist - public,d c2.102004
13, Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None are needed.
(STAFF COMMENTS
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is served by Pine Street (or 216th St SW) which curves into a connection with
Chinook Rd to the south/southwest. Pine Street connects to Hwy 104 to the east.
(STAFF COMMENTS)--.
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklist • public doc:2,10.2004
b. Is site currently server) by public transit? If no, what is the approxinrate distance to the nearest transit.
stop?
No. Per commtrans.org, the nearest stop is located 0.55mi away at 5th Ave S & Pine St.
M
9
BE
(STAFF COMMENTS)__
How rnany parking spaces would the c.ornpleted project have? flora nsany would the project clirninate?
144 vehicle parking spaces are proposed (plus approx. 18 bicycle spaces); the project would
eliminate none.
Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or inaprovenrents to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
Proposal will require removal of existing concrete curb, gutter & driveway aprons along Pine Street on the north & west
sides of the development. North driveway will be replaced with new concrete vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The two
west driveways will be replaced/relocated to provide access to parking garage & provide a main entrance to the project with
access to surface parking. Type 2 curb ramps will be installed at each new driveway. Concrete sidewalk will be extended
from new driveway at project entrance south to connect to and match the existing sidewalk. Additional asphalt paving,
concrete curb, gutter & sidewalk repair will be required to accommodate storm drain connections
to existing catchbasins, & water service connections to the existing main in Pine Street.
(STAFF C:OMMEI" TS)_-_
Will the project use (or occur in the inanrediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
An Amtrak station is located at the waterfront area of downtown Edmonds on Railroad Ave.,
approximately 200 meters south of the Washington State Ferry dock.
Page 20 of'24
aaara ehcAIisI - pubhi dov:l1 ,200.1
r. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volunies would occur.
The project is estimated to generate 592 trips per day based on 89 apartment units. The
peak volumes are estimated to coincide with the commute peak hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, ifany:
R.O.W. improvements.
- - ----- - ---------- ------------- - - - --- --------
15. Public Services I I
a, Would (lie project result in an increased need for public services (for example. fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe,
Existing fire protection & police services, and the Edmonds school district will serve the project.
-- — --- ---- 1------'---'----- ------
(STAFF------
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if ally,
None are needed. It is anticipated current services are adequate for the project.
(STAFF COMMENT'S
flag!c 21 of 24
swxra Owcklw - phhv.doc2I 0.2004
16, Utilities
fll. Circle utilities currently available at the site
systeni, other:
elevision and Internet
(STATT CO
K Describe the titilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities oil the site Or in the inlynediate vicinity which might be needed.
Water/sewer service by City of Edmonds; electricity by Snohomish County PUD; natural
gas by Puget Sound Energy; telephone service by Verizon; cable television/internet service
by Comcast; refuse service by Allied Waste.
(STAFF CO
C. SIGNATUM,
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my kno-tMedge.
juake its decisi
0
0
ignature off Prop nent
N
k
Page 22 of 24
."pa cheek list - p,)1,k,d,n:2A0,2004
I understand that the lead agency is relying oil thein to
M"
Date Submitted
RECEIVED
50 Pine Street SEPA Checklist Attachments [ E 3 0 12 a
(order corresponds to initial reference at checklist) DEVELO NIENT SERVICES
COUNTER
-Attachment A (environmental document list noted at Pt. Edwards LLC 2002 SEPA
checklist)
-Department of Ecology MTCA letter of compliance
-Pt. Edwards LLC SEPA checklist (2002)
-Conditions, Recommendations, & Request For Consideration Report for Edmonds -- Unocal
Tank Farm & Pt. Edwards Greenbelt Forest (2002)
-Unocal Corporation SEPA checklist (2002)
-The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife (1995)
-City of Edmonds RCW 197-11-965 Adoption Of Existing Environmental Document (2005)
-Landscape site plan & planting list
-Civil site plan
-Zoning map
-Vicinity Map
-Steep slope diagrams (2002)