The URL can be used to link to this page

Staff Report +Attachments.pdffile. 18,ka CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5ch Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: +,vww,edmonds r ov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Eleven (1 1) Two -Story Detached Single Family Homes File Number: PLN20170017 Date of Report: June 1 , 2t17 Staff Contact: . �'/'1 1 Brad` ipley Associate Planner Public Hearing: Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250-5'h Avenue N, Edmonds, WA 98020 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct eleven (11) new detached single-family homes with attached garages. The subject site consists of three (3) parcels zoned multi -family residential (RM -2.4) in southwest Edmonds. II. DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS General design review applies to all areas of the city not specifically designated for district - based design review. The subject site falls under general design review. Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010(A), the Architectural Design Board (ADB) shall review all proposed developments that require a State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) threshold determination. The ABD shall review the proposed development for compliance with applicable codes and Comprehensive Plan design guidelines and adopt the findings and conclusions of this staff report along with any modifications of existing conditions or subsequent conditions. IIL. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Review under SEPA is required for this project because the project exceeds four (4) single- family units. The applicant submitted a SEPA checklist for the project (attachment 8) and the City determined that the requirements for environmental protection have been adequately addressed. A SEPA threshold determination of non -significance (DNS) was issued on May 2, 2017 (attachment 5). IV. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed by Snohomish County Fire District #1 and the Engineering and Building Divisions of the Development Services Department. Snohomish County Fire District #1 identified sections of the International Fire Code that apply to the project (attachment 6). Compliance with fire code requirements will be verified through building permit review. The Engineering Division provided comments regarding a requirement for frontage improvements and potential stormwater issues (attachment 6). The applicant provided a response to the Engineering Division's comments addressing the stormwater issues. Subsequently, Engineering provided a memo of compliance (attachment 6). Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. The Building Division determined the project would not affect their department. V. DEVELOPMENT CODE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS ECDC 16.30 - Multi -Family Residential Zone (RM -2.4) ECDC 16.30.0 10 Uses Single family dwellings are a permitted primary use within the RM zone. ECDC 16.30.030 Development Standards Minimum Lot Area Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum per Subdistrict DnalJt�rxg Street Side Rear Height Core,u�qre Setback Setback Setback Unit (Sq. Ft.) m ISM -2.4 2,400 15' 10' 15' 254 45% "Roof only may extendf..v..e.. ....h..�e�zg ht eet above the ..s.-tam.t..e..d....l...e...i ght limit if all ortions o the roof above ..stated limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches orgreater. Staff Findings: The proposal meets density, setback, height, and lot coverage standards. Some units have patios that extend into the side and rear setbacks; however, pursuant to ECDC 16.30.040(C)(2), uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may project into a required setback not more than one-third of the required setback, or four feet, whichever is less; provided, that they are no more than 30 inches above the ground level at any point. ECDC 17.50.020 — Off -Street Parking Regulations Two (2) parking spaces are required for each unit. The parking requirement is met through attached two -car garages for each unit. Page 2 of 9 ECDC 20.1 1 — General Design Review ADB is required to review design review applications that trigger SEPA. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the criteria for building design and site treatment. ECDC 20. 1. .i ) BtriMing,Devipi. No one architectural style is required The blaldiiig shall be c1esa4aed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with theastit and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of baaikliarg deq," n shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of buildia�g dei. ,gn: 7. All exterior hudefi)�g components, including windows, doors, eaves, andparapets; Staff Findings: Building components are harmonious with the existing character of the nearby area. 2. Colors, which should avoid c:xassive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area; Staff Findings: The proposed colors scheme avoids excessive brilliance or brightness (attachment 4). 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buikll, As should be screened from view from the street level; Staff Findings: Details regarding the location of mechanical equipment were not provided with the design review application; however, due to the single-family nature of the project, mechanical or other utility hardware will likely be placed within each unit. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildi)i�rf shall be avoided in order to compywith the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. Staff Findings: The buildings are detached single-family units. 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. Staff Findings: The proposed development does not currently propose any signage. All signage will be reviewed under the subsequent building permit. Staff finds the project is consistent with design guidelines contained within ECDC 20.11.030(A) ® 1. 3Site Treatment The ex%wtiar character of the site and the nearby area should be the startingpoint for the design of the buildb and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 7. Garariaatt, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be mininaied where natural beauty exists.rge cut and fall and impervious surfaces should be avoided. Page 3 of 9 Staff Findings: A majority of the site is currently developed with three (3) single-family homes, a carport, and a detached garage. Road and building sites will be cleared, graded, and compacted as necessary to achieve proper grading transition, drainage, and structural stability. Approximately 1,092 CY of material will be cut and 1,220 CY will be used for fill. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the buildiii desgn and other site improvements. Staff Findings: Interior landscaping softens the appearance of parking areas 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities nearyard spaces, streets or residential units, and different brildi, heights, design or color. Staff Findings: Landscaping provides for visual buffers to all adjacent properties.. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. Staff Findings: Landscaping occurs primarily around the perimeter of the development and in-between buildings; conflicts between landscaping and pedestrians or vehicles are not likely. 5. Serviceyards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. Staff Findings: No service yards are proposed. Garbage cans are to be kept in private 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. Staff Findings: No significant seasonal changes to the effectiveness of screening; of the trees proposed for the perimeter, 85 -percent are evergreen. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone andgravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted forplanting in areas unsuitable forplantgrowth. Staff Findings: Not applicable. 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. H%a' Fs: r: brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Staff Findings: Four (4) exterior lights are proposed per unit: one (1) light on either side of the garage, one (1) entry light, and one (1) rear patio light. Exterior lighting placement can be referenced on the building plan sheets (attachment 4). Staff finds the proposal is consistent with design guidelines contained within ECDC 20.11.030(8) Page 4 of 9 ECDC 20.11.030(C) Other Criteria. 1. Community fai rlilies and public or quasi public improvements should not conflict with the c xi cling and planned character of the nearby area. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guaiYbu ls`, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the e,,, is//) g and planned character of the nearby area. Landscape Requirements landscapingType 11 landscaping is required on all sides that border adjacent lots and Type III is required for interior landscaping between interpret • •• • • • ! 1 buildings.11#. Staff Findings: Per the associated landscape plan (attachment 5), Type 11 and Type III landscaping is Provided for according to ECDC 20.13.030. Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Objectives Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, ped(,+�tI ian walkways and landscaping features is anintegral part of how a butldrtr interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by per es1rians, bicycles and automobiles, minrrara ti;r,u potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and aclivilves within a disid'rt and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildiq,r in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and hep define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. Staff Findings: One (1) consolidated provided • r• 4 Outdoor guest parking is proposed between buildings, not along the street frontage. A.3 Connections Cin- and CD°ite. Design site access and circulation within and between .rites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to proriding and improving connections to transit. Staff Findings: Transit stops are located approximately 151 from • . are accessed from the existing sidewalk via the proposed driveway. Page 5 of 9 A.4 13xsdrd r Entry Location. Buildii,g entries should be configured to provide clear entry point.# to buildio��.�, be oriented to peder'trian a va1kwgyslpatbwgys, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry forgathering or seating is ele4rable for mi'ie,lential or mixed use buildin,js, Staff Findings: Building entries face the interior of the project and are not oriented to the street. Additionally, buildings adjacent to the street have few side windows and provide little visual interest. Landscaping will help to enhance the visual character of the streetscape; however, the proposal does not provide space for gathering or sitting. A.5 .Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of •each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontgzge tying each site to its neigbbor..Setbacks• should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, praviill#z for transition areas between public streets and private buildir entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. Staff Findings: Project meets the setbacks requirements for the zone. A. 6 Open dace, For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places far interaction, play, se#itin�,, and other activities. Staff Findings: Open space or green space is provided in the rear yard and on the side of buildings. The space provided is narrow, approximately 5 -feet in width, and not conducive for encouraging play or interaction. A.7 I3 rllllr� /Site Identity. Improve pedertiian access and away -finding by proi4dtng variety in buildira�,,forms, colors, materials and individuality of•bui°lelin, . Staff Findings: The proposal provides two (2) model types. While the colors vary slightly, the building form and choice of materials are repetitive. A.8 Wleather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries forpedrstrian weather protection, Staff Findings: Covered entries are provided. A9 Ii gb1in g. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians — including builcliris entries, walkways, par/ ing areas, circulation areas and otdier open spaces — to support activity and securzy. Staff Findings: Four (4) exterior lights are proposed per unit: one (1) light on either side of the garage, one (1) entry light, and one (1) rear patio light. Exterior lighting placement can be referenced on the building plan sheets (attachment 4). A 10 Signage, Encourage signage thatprovides clear inforrrzatinn and direction forproperties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered Encourage the use ofµ nr#pbics and symbols in signage to support the city'.# emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. Staff Findings: No signage proposed at this time. A. l l ,Site l llditier, 5•tonige Trash and Mechanical Systems, Minimh� the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility syrtems using such features as landscapi% build#),vg fbrms, or integrated des,l yv. Page 6 of 9 Staff Findings: Garbage cans are to be kept inside the garages. A. 92 Inte1�1;rating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landfbrms — such as rocky oulr,°rolrlrh:r or significant trees — into site design a vheneverpossible. Staff Findings: No significant lot site features exist. A,13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and ruin gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Staff Findings: Landscaping is provided for pursuant to ECDC 20.13. e;tgra ObjectivesoiCixl Form. But°lrJirz height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversiy in bulldiq) forms, minimi:Ze shadows cast by taller builelitr, s- upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and buz'ldita entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban fo . A.14 Builclin��p Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous bviltit� fbrms. A.15 Alrr.uhs g. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildtr s by encoun,,�ging human scale elements in btrzlelirak design andl or by subdirridr�rg buildir masses vertically or horizontally. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof fbrms to hep identij different pna alas or functional areas within the builrTrr and support differentiation of building form and melsxirr . Roof des?,gn, in combination with wall modulation, can allow fora°irlitartnal light to enter builei1q," orpealestrian spaces. A.17 Wlall Modulation. Vat align in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments° and streetseapes, or to hey break up large br ilclii masses to keep ' scale with the surrounding environment, Staff Findings: Two (2) model types are proposed. There is little variation within the development. Roof modulation is typical of single-family development. De i9f, Objectives for BuildingFapa de. Burltliq facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a buildiq — the portion of a butleliq that defines the character and visual appearance of a place — is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense ofplace and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Buildil;� Fafade Design. Encourage buildi' fafades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in butldia A.19 Window Variety and Articala ion. Use window size and placement to hep define the scale and character of floe builcltx Use the or and combinations of window types to reinforce the Page 7 of 9 streetscape character or to provide variation in a fafade, as well as provide light and air to the banilrlt.' interior. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on buikfi,'ra, fafades to hep define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in fafade materials can hep reduce the apparent bulk of larger ba rlrli�r .while allowing variety and individieali r of bilik iqd� x r. Staff Findings: The front facade of each unit utilizes a mixture of materials (board -and - batten, shake, and stone) to help define the style and scale of the building. The rear and sides of each building are lap -siding with no variation and few windows. VI.. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of Application and SEPA determination was published in the Edmonds Herald, posted at the site, as well as the Edmonds Library, Public Safety Building, and Development Services Department, and mailed to property owners within 300 -ft on May 2, 2017. A Notice of Public Hearing was similarly advertised on June 7, 2017. The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.03. See attachment 7 for public notice documentation. No public comments have been received to date. VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of proposed development applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments within this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for the proposed development under file number PLN20170017 with the following motion and recommended conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICIES OF ECDC 20.10, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGIULATIONS AND APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IS UP TO THE APPLICANT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH VARIOUS PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THESE CODES. 2. ADDITIONAL INTEREST SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SIDE AND REAR WINDOWS IN THE FORM OF VARIED SILL OR CASING WIDTHS, MATERIALS, OR COLORS. Page 8 of 9 3. ARCHITECTURAL INTEREST SUCH AS ADDITIONAL WINDOWS, VARIATION OF MATERIALS, OR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SIDES OF THE UNITS WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO STREET FACING FACADES. 4. CURBSTOPS SHALL BE INCLUDED FOR GUEST PARKING SPACES TO KEEP FROM DAMAGING LANDSCAPED AREAS. VIII. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121-5 h Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Mike Mietzner Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC. 11611 Airport Road, Suite B-1 Everett, WA 98204 IX. ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant cover letter 2. Vicinity map 3. Land Use Application 4. Project plan sheets 5. Landscape Plan 6. Technical Review Committee comments 7. Public notice documentation 8. SEPA checklist Brian Kalab Insight Engineering Co. PO Box 1478 Everett, WA 98206 Page 9 of 9 244TH ST — COVER LETTER The proposed project 244th St is located at 8609 244th SW, Edmonds in Snohomish County, Washington. The site is currently developed with three houses, a garage, a shop, and two sheds. The remainder of the site is trees, landscaping, and access drives. This proposal is for 11 detached single-family dwelling units on one 0.90 -acre lot. Zoning The standards for RM 2.4 are being followed for this project. The minimum number of square feet per unit is 2400. The lot is 39,012 square feet. Thus, the maximum number of units would be 16. As previously stated, this proposal is for 11 units, which is well within the limit. The setbacks shown follow the zone, with 15 feet at the rear of the lot, 10 feet at the sides, and 15 feet at the front. The building height has a maximum of just under 29 feet. While the standard maximum height is 25 feet, per ECDC 16.030.A(1), a building may have an additional 5 feet of height if all the roof above 25 feet has a slope of at least 4 inches in 12 inches of greater. Per our attached building elevations, this condition will be met, thus our buildings follow the code. The buildings as shown cover 14,579 square feet, or 37.37% of the lot, below the maximum lot coverage of 45%. In addition, while some of the units have patios that protrude into the setback area, these never protrude more than 40 inches, or 3.33 feet, in the case of the side yards, or 4 feet in the case of the rear yard. Parking Each unit has two parking spaces, provided per ECDC 17.50.020.A. In addition, 10 guest spaces have been provided. Landscaping Landscaping has been provided per the landscaping code, see the landscape plan. While, because of all the units being on one lot, the project needs to file under multifamily/townhome, in spirit, it is a single- family development. It is not a super -dense project. The homes will be two stories high. Thus, because of these factors, type II landscape buffers have been provided on all sides that border other lots, with type III landscaping between the buildings and the street. Comprehensive Plan This proposal is in the spirit of the goals of the residential policy of the comprehensive plan. The proposal does not impose upon the view of others, being only two stories high. The site presents few environmental constraints. Finally, every effort is being made to harmonize the proposal with the existing neighborhoods around it. In addition, this proposal could be considered infill, given the site's current zoning versus its current use. P.O Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • P: 425.303.9363 F: 425.303.9362 • info@insightengineering.net In addition, the project takes access from one main private drive aisle, minimizing the number of curb cuts to the public sidewalk. Established setbacks have been followed, buildings are oriented toward the internal street, and landscaping has been used to soften sharp edges around the site. Overall, this letter demonstrates that not only does the proposal meet zoning requirements; it also meets the intent of the code and the comprehensive plan. P.O Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • P: 425.303.9363 F: 425.303.9362 • info@insightengineering.net ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN NARRATIVE FOR 244TH ST. PROJECT jj�pp F f 41 SUBJECT PROPERTY: The subject Property is located at 8609, 8611 and 8615 — 244th St. SW. in Edmonds, WA. VOLUME/MASSING: Please refer to the proposed Building Plans. Also refer to Google Maps. The proposal is for 11 detached single-family 2 -story residential homes, spaced between 10 and 14 feet apart. Setbacks are 15' to the north, 15' to the south (244th St. SW), 10' to the east and west. The 3 home types are 29', 32' and 42' wide units. They vary in length from 39' to 44'. These homes are only 2 - story and are therefore height-weight proportionate. In comparison to the surrounding neighborhood I would, describe the volume/massing of the proposed project as "Medium". The homes to the west and north of the subject property would be described as low volume due to their larger single-family lot sizes. The apartment complex adjacent and east of the subject property would be described as High Volume due to the length of the multi -family structures. The Volume/Massing of the subject property is therefore Medium in comparison to the surrounding properties. The Volume/Massing of the proposed project is in my opinion within reason and not offensive. BUILDING ELEVATIONS: Please refer to the proposed Building Plans. These illustrate building massing and openings, materials and roof forms. Please also refer to the Exterior Paint Colors demonstrating a variety of paint and stone work choices. LIGHTING PLAN: Please refer to the proposed Building Plans for location of exterior lights. There will be 2 lights at the Garage (1 on either side of the garage door), an entry light and an exterior light to a rear patio.. These are the standard new construction lights with standard intensity of illumination for residential purposes. Interior lighting will also be standard for residential homes. ATTACHMENT #3 City of Edmonds �, a Land Use Application K ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HOME OCCUPATION FORMAL SUBDIVISION SHORT SUBDIVISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT STREET VACATION REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION OTHER: •til,ds1.5hAdll"F"N7drRA"sII;:LIAP"tdRtdATIOIfi:C]NI•t div(:" WIT7,11NTOE,4PPLIC#T'ifuf?NISAPUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS ata tQrA1ulN 8609 244tmm6 St t, S WEdmonds, WA 98026 w ��.....�..........��...�. PROJECT NAME IF APPLICABLE 244th St. _s rime LL _ PHONE # (425) 212-2490 PROPERTY OWNER Mietn8r' Brother.. P _. ADDRESS 11611 Airport Road, Suite B-1, Everett„ WA 98204 E-MAIL mikemr�mietznergroup.com FAX# (425) 212-2243 TAX ACCOUNT # 00463303100103, 00463303100105, 00463303100102 SEC, 31 TWP, 27 N RNG. 04 E DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Prosect is to construct 11 units on approximately 0,88 acres. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY)_,,,,,,,..,,,_,,,. APPLICANT. Mietzner BrOtherS Propertpes, LLC PHONE# (425) 212-2490 ADDRESS 11611 Xrpiort Road, Suite B-1, EverettWA 98204 E-MAIL ^FAX# (425) 212-2243TlkeT_eg CONTACT PERSON/AGENT BrianBpBtaw P E / insught Englr� eringwCo, PHONE/# (425) 303-9363mmmm� ADDRESS P.O. Box 1478 Everett, WA 98206 E-MAIL bean(Wi ghtengineering.net FAX# (425) 303-9362 mss The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees, By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENTr as listed below,. and that I am authorized to file this a licatwn o m Z;'�K/N a tl of DATE .. ._�. I'vop ilty Owners Authorization I b ' t , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of mrtogrg ap that the paluaM1a true mmmd correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the perp i` S 5 `sat and po%stin aN, i1I to this application, SIGNATURE OF OWNtipt �� f �, �..... _ a DATE mm� ),tore+stie, n%? Calif (425) 771-0220 Revised on 8/22//2 B - Land Use Application Page I of I El Nia aaa asl a 'pill Mill o XiJl II o IP all SO NEESE MEN El Nia aaa asl a 'pill Mill o XiJl m o IP m aOz/t/6 - mdp 0 IM - 4, z - WO z AN01S Z TV z 30 t # MOLE - .O-,ttii/[ 4iad 4S 4&w NOILYA3-9 Tn 'S3LUBdONd SO L08 HW LSI 170 AOZAIe - MCIP is Tw - il+- wo z AVOIS z L 40 L # 4004s - .8-d-.+A 4-*OQ +s Ww �cm-°m6e-a I NOIlVA3-a on's3LLH3dw sg3uoe v3KA. W Z19V 9 0 r�9 Rte' Scheme #1 Main - Accent - Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Virtual Taupe VanDyke Brown Black Fox Traditional SW7039 SW7041 SW7020 Cream N Scheme #2 Main - Accent- Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Adaptive Shade Suitable Brown Tricorn Black Traditional SW7053 SW7054 SW6258 Cream '"] [,,,,-,S,Fheme #3 Main - Accent - Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Portobello Latte Black Fox Traditional SW6102 SW6108 SW7020 Cream r"";/jJfd W �; nn S 11 c 11 h 11 eme #4 Main - Accent - Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Cobble Brown Rookwood Clay Black Bean Traditional SW6082 SW2823 SW6006 Cream Scheme #5.....� Main - Accent- Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Rare Gray Thunderous Andiron Traditional SW6199 SW6201 SW6174 Cream Scheme #6 Main - Accent - Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Suitable Brown Gray Area Tricorn Black Traditional SW7054 SW7052 SW6258 Creant Q Scheme.............. #7. Main - Accent - Front Door - Trim/Gutters - Eclipse Svelte Sage Andiron Traditia,tnal SW6166 SW6164 SW6174 Cream Scheme #1 - Virtual Taupe Scheme #3 - Portobello Scheme #2 - Adaptive Shade Scheme #4 - Cobble Brown G Scheme #5 - Rare Gray Scheme #6 - Suitable :brown Scheme #7 - Eclipse . ...... \ C114, 133HIS HIM >v - \ \ - \ { �§ TF ATTACHMENT #6 ...... ....... _ CITY F 11:..:.DMON11DS- P111 IN IU l ,,, D11VIS10114 „I„ III: l 'I" FORM ❑ PW -Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ PW - Maintenance ❑ Parks & Rec. ❑ Building Project Number: PLN20170017 Applicant's Name: MIETZNER BROTHERS PROPERTIES LLC Property Location: 8609 8611 + 8615 244TH ST SW Date Application Received: 3-21-17 Date Application Routed: 3-22-17 Zoning: R -2.4 Project Description: 11 MULTIFAMILY THE UNITS WITH 2 PARKING SPACES EACH UNIT. If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: BRAD SHIPLEY Ext. 1367_ Name of Ind Title: r dual Submitting Comments:... ADate: ❑ 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT so I have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTME'N sol have provided comments or conditions below or attached. (p if additional space is needed): Comments ease attach memo The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): ZED,,, hPA R March 30, 2017 CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM To: Brad Shipley, Associate Planner From: Kevin Zweber, Fire Marshal Re: Plan Check: PLN2017017 Address: 8609244 th ST SW, Edmonds Project: 11 Unit residential project After review of the preliminary plans for the above project, it was found that the following will be required: 1. Adequate fire flow — IFC Appendix B. 2. Adequate fire hydrant spacing — IFC Appendix C. 3, Fire Access — IFC 503 (fire lane standard) including fire turn -around. Additional items specific to the building plan submittals. Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief — Fire Marshal City of Edmonds, Department of Fire Prevention .,.,.,..... _, _._..._........ CITY OF EDMONDS — PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM ❑ PW -Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ PW - Maintenance ❑ Parks & Rec. 0,11auilding Project Number: PLN20170017 Applicant's Name: MIETZN'ER BROTHERS PROPERTIES LLC Property Location: p y 8609 8611 8615 244TH ST SW , Date Application Received: 3-21-17 Date Application Routed: 3-22-17 Zoning: RM -2.4 Project Description: 11 MULTIFAMILY / TOWNHOME UNITS WIT" 2 PARKING SPACES EACH UNIT. If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: BRAD SHIPLEY Ext. 1367 Name of Individual Submitting Comments„ c Title: 01 I have reviewed this land use proposal for ❑ my department and have concluded that IT WOULD NOT AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT so 1 have no comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. e: 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have concluded that IT WOULD AFFECT MY DEPARTMENT. so 1 have provided comments or conditions below or attached. Comments (please attach memo if additional space is needed): The following conditions should be attached to this permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this department (please attach memo if additional space is needed): Date: To: From: Subject: May 16, 2017 Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN201700X17 — Design Review for 11 -Unit Development Mietzner 'Brothers Properties — 8609 244t' St SW The comments provided below are based upon review of the application and documents submitted with the design review application for the subject property. Additional information is requested from the applicant at this time. Please ask the applicant to respond to the following. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS 1. An existing sidewalk has been shown along the frontage of the property, however, it is unclear where existing driveway approaches are located. Please show existing approaches as "to be removed" and indicate the requirement to construct a new driveway approach. STORMWATER Background This is classified as a Category 2 Small Site because it proposes impervious area exceeding 5,000 SF. Category 2 Small Site Projects are subject to Small Site Minimum Requirements 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Project Feasibility The project is not considered to be technically feasible due to the proposed storm drainage design. 1) The City of Edmonds requires the use of the Puget East 36 rainfall in the WWHM model. The drainage report uses the Everett rain gage. The proposed detention facility will likely enlarge. 2) The subject parcel is part of the Ednionds Way basin The project proposes discluirging to the. MS4 in 244' St SW. This proposed discharge is to Lake Ballinger_ As such it does not preserve the natural drainage path specified by MR #4. Lake Ballinger is a 303(d) water body and experiences flooding. Lake Ballinger cannot accept additional discharge. The drainage report does correctly identify the natural drainage path to the north. City of Edmonds 3) Detention may not be feasible as discharge to the north as multiple drainage easements will be required. 4) Infiltration is feasible according to the geotechnical report. Design infiltration rates are provided for permeable pavements and infiltration trenches. Thank you. May 18, 2017 Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager The City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: PLN20170017 — Design Review for 11 -Unit Development Mietzner Brothers Properties — 8609 244t' St SW IECO No. 16-0800 Dear Ms. McConnell, The project referenced above is revised in response to the review comments dated May 16, 2017. Based upon the review comments regarding the discharge points of the proposed project, the proposed redesign incorporates infiltration to fully infiltrate the runoff from the site by the means of permeable pavement. Flow control, water quality and onsite stormwater management requirements will be met by providing infiltration through the permeable pavement, subsequent aggregate and underlaying soil layers. The permeable pavement was designed in accordance with the geotechnical engineer's recommendations. The infiltration rate that was recommended by the geotechnical engineer was 0.25 iph. The pavement section recommended by the geotechnical engineer is a 4" layer of porous pavement, a 4"layer of 5/8" crushed rock base and a 10" layer of 2-1/2" crushed rock. Our design will incorporate an additional 2" of 2- 1/2" crushed rock to provide additional storage. The runoff from the roof will be connected to the gravel subbase to infiltrate underneath the permeable. The proposed project will no longer divert the basin runoff. The overflow for the infiltration trench will be connected to a dispersion trench to flow north to continue the natural drainage path of the site. The WWHM analysis uses the Puget East 36 rainfall data. Refer to the following pages for the WWHM report. Please feel free to contact the with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, 4 q Brian Kalab PE, Project Manager PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net ,., s°�.o.o.o w.,.... Total Site Area = 0.90Acres Total Area Included in the Analysis = 0.68 Arces The area included in the analysis will be the area where the new impervious is proposed. From the Soil Conservation Service Map of Snohomish County, the majority of the site contains Error! Reference source not found.. Existing Basin Summary Existing Basin = OAR Acres Total area included in the analysis =0.68 Acres Entire existing basin was modeled as forested areas. Refer to the Existing Basin Map and the following pages for more details. Developed Basin Summary 'Develo ed Basin = 0.68 Acres Total area included in the analysis =0.68 Acres Refer to the Developed Basin Map for representation. Impervious: Roof Area = 0.44 Acres (19,117 SF) Sidewalk = 0.02 Acres (566 SF) load permeable l'av4 ) = 0.22 Acra��(.,) 7:17 S Total Existing Impervious = 0.68 Acres (29,420 SF) PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net WWHM2012 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: 244th St Perm Pav Site Name: 244th St Site Address: 8609 244th SW City : Edmonds Report Date: 5/18/2017 MGS Regoin Puget East Data Start 1901/10/1 Data End : 2058/09/30 DOT Data Number: 03 Version Date: 2016/02/25 Version : 4.2.12 Low Flow Threshold for POC 1 : 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC 1: 50 year PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name : Ex Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre C, Forest, Flat .68 Pervious Total 0.68 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.68 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater MITIGATED LAND USE Name : Permeable Pavement Pavement Area: 0.2237 ft. Pavement Length: 406.00 ft. Pavement Width: 24.00 ft. PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net Pavement slope 1: 0.02 To 1 Pavement thickness: 0.33 Pour Space of Pavement: 0.3 Material thickness of second layer: 1.33 Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.4 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 0.25 Infiltration safety factor: 1 Wetted surface area On Total Volume Infiltrated (ac -ft.): 250.939 Total Volume Through Riser (ac -ft.): 0 Total Volume Through Facility (ac -ft.): 250.939 Percent Infiltrated: 100 Total Precip Applied to Facility: 0 Total Evap From Facility: 8.357 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net Permeable Pavement Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) Area(ac.) volume(ac-£t.) Discharae(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.223 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0162 0.223 0.001 0.000 0.056 0.0324 0.223 0.002 0.000 0.056 0.0487 0.223 0.004 0.000 0.056 0.0649 0.223 0.005 0.000 0.056 0.0811 0.223 0.007 0.000 0.056 0.0973 0.223 0.008 0.000 0.056 0.1136 0.223 0.010 0.000 0.056 0.1298 0.223 0.011 0.000 0.056 0.1460 0.223 0.013 0.000 0.056 0.1622 0.223 0.014 0.000 0.056 0.1784 0.223 0.016 0.000 0.056 0.1947 0.223 0.017 0.000 0.056 0.2109 0.223 0.018 0.000 0.056 0.2271 0.223 0.020 0.000 0.056 0.2433 0.223 0.021 0.000 0.056 0.2596 0.223 0.023 0.000 0.056 0.2758 0.223 0.024 0.000 0.056 0.2920 0.223 0.026 0.000 0.056 0.3082 0.223 0.027 0.000 0.056 0.3244 0.223 0.029 0.000 0.056 0.3407 0.223 0.030 0.000 0.056 0.3569 0.223 0.031 0.000 0.056 0.3731 0.223 0.033 0.000 0.056 0.3893 0.223 0.034 0.000 0.056 0.4056 0.223 0.036 0.000 0.056 0.4218 0.223 0.037 0.000 0.056 0.4380 0.223 0.039 0.000 0.056 0.4542 0.223 0.040 0.000 0.056 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 0.4704 0.223 0.042 0.000 0.056 0.4867 0.223 0.043 0.000 0.056 0.5029 0.223 0.045 0.000 0.056 0.5191 0.223 0.046 0.000 0.056 0.5353 0.223 0.047 0.000 0.056 0.5516 0.223 0.049 0.000 0.056 0.5678 0.223 0.050 0.000 0.056 0.5840 0.223 0.052 0.000 0.056 0.6002 0.223 0.053 0.000 0.056 0.6164 0.223 0.055 0.000 0.056 0.6327 0.223 0.056 0.000 0.056 0.6489 0.223 0.058 0.000 0.056 0.6651 0.223 0.059 0.000 0.056 0.6813 0.223 0.061 0.000 0.056 0.6976 0.223 0.062 0.000 0.056 0.7138 0.223 0.063 0.000 0.056 0.7300 0.223 0.065 0.000 0.056 0.7462 0.223 0.066 0.000 0.056 0.7624 0.223 0.068 0.000 0.056 0.7787 0.223 0.069 0.000 0.056 0.7949 0.223 0.071 0.000 0.056 0.8111 0.223 0.072 0.000 0.056 0.8273 0.223 0.074 0.000 0.056 0.8436 0.223 0.075 0.000 0.056 0.8598 0.223 0.076 0.000 0.056 0.8760 0.223 0.078 0.000 0.056 0.8922 0.223 0.079 0.000 0.056 0.9084 0.223 0.081 0.000 0.056 0.9247 0.223 0.082 0.000 0.056 0.9409 0.223 0.084 0.000 0.056 0.9571 0.223 0.085 0.000 0.056 0.9733 0.223 0.087 0.000 0.056 0.9896 0.223 0.088 0.000 0.056 1.0058 0.223 0.090 0.000 0.056 1.0220 0.223 0.091 0.000 0.056 1.0382 0.223 0.092 0.000 0.056 1.0544 0.223 0.094 0.000 0.056 1.0707 0.223 0.095 0.000 0.056 1.0869 0.223 0.097 0.000 0.056 1.1031 0.223 0.098 0.000 0.056 1.1193 0.223 0.100 0.000 0.056 1.1356 0.223 0.101 0.000 0.056 1.1518 0.223 0.103 0.000 0.056 1.1680 0.223 0.104 0.000 0.056 1.1842 0.223 0.106 0.000 0.056 1.2004 0.223 0.107 0.000 0.056 1.2167 0.223 0.108 0.000 0.056 1.2329 0.223 0.110 0.000 0.056 1.2491 0.223 0.111 0.000 0.056 1.2653 0.223 0.113 0.000 0.056 1.2816 0.223 0.114 0.000 0.056 1.2978 0.223 0.116 0.000 0.056 1.3140 0.223 0.117 0.000 0.056 1.3302 0.223 0.118 0.000 0.056 1.3464 0.223 0.119 0.000 0.056 1.3627 0.223 0.120 0.000 0.056 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net Name : Roof Bypass: No Impervious Land Use acre ROOF TOPS FLAT LAT 0.44 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Permeable Pavement Name : Sidewalk Bypass: No Im ervious Land Use acre DRIVEWAYS FLAT LAT 0.02 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Permeable Pavement ANALYSIS RESULTS Stream Protection Duration Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.68 Total Impervious Area:O Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:O Total Impervious Area:0.683691 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.011434 5 year 0.017667 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 1.3789 0.223 0.121 0.000 0.056 1.3951 0.223 0.123 0.000 0.056 1.4113 0.223 0.124 0.000 0.056 1.4276 0.223 0.125 0.000 0.056 1.4438 0.223 0.126 0.000 0.056 1.4600 0.223 0.127 0.000 0.056 Name : Roof Bypass: No Impervious Land Use acre ROOF TOPS FLAT LAT 0.44 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Permeable Pavement Name : Sidewalk Bypass: No Im ervious Land Use acre DRIVEWAYS FLAT LAT 0.02 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Permeable Pavement ANALYSIS RESULTS Stream Protection Duration Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.68 Total Impervious Area:O Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:O Total Impervious Area:0.683691 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.011434 5 year 0.017667 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 10 year 0.021039 25 year 0.024462 50 year 0.026493 100 year 0.028162 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated„ POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0 5 year 0 10 year 0 25 year 0 50 year 0 100 year 0 Stream Protection Duration Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated.. POC #1 Year Predeveloned Mitigated 1902 0.016 0.000 1903 0.006 0.000 1904 0.010 0.000 1905 0.007 0.000 1906 0.003 0.000 1907 0.018 0.000 1908 0.011 0.000 1909 0.012 0.000 1910 0.020 0.000 1911 0.010 0.000 1912 0.028 0.000 1913 0.017 0.000 1914 0.004 0.000 1915 0.006 0.000 1916 0.009 0.000 1917 0.005 0.000 1918 0.011 0.000 1919 0.008 0.000 1920 0.011 0.000 1921 0.011 0.000 1922 0.013 0.000 1923 0.008 0.000 1924 0.006 0.000 1925 0.006 0.000 1926 0.010 0.000 1927 0.013 0.000 1928 0.009 0.000 1929 0.018 0.000 1930 0.011 0.000 1931 0.011 0.000 1932 0.008 0.000 1933 0.009 0.000 1934 0.025 0.000 1935 0.009 0.000 1936 0.015 0.000 1937 0.012 0.000 1938 0.013 0.000 1939 0.001 0.000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 1940 0.010 0.000 1941 0.010 0.000 1942 0.015 0.000 1943 0.005 0.000 1944 0.012 0.000 1945 0.011 0.000 1946 0.010 0.000 1947 0.007 0.000 1948 0.024 0.000 1949 0.019 0.000 1950 0.010 0.000 1951 0.012 0.000 1952 0.034 0.000 1953 0.030 0.000 1954 0.009 0.000 1955 0.008 0.000 1956 0.005 0.000 1957 0.013 0.000 1958 0.032 0.000 1959 0.019 0.000 1960 0.007 0.000 1961 0.020 0.000 1962 0.010 0.000 1963 0.005 0.000 1964 0.007 0.000 1965 0.023 0.000 1966 0.004 0.000 1967 0.009 0.000 1968 0.012 0.000 1969 0.008 0.000 1970 0.013 0.000 1971 0.025 0.000 1972 0.016 0.000 1973 0.018 0.000 1974 0.010 0.000 1975 0.027 0.000 1976 0.012 0.000 1977 0.007 0.000 1978 0.023 0.000 1979 0.006 0.000 1980 0.011 0.000 1981 0.011 0.000 1982 0.008 0.000 1983 0.019 0.000 1984 0.005 0.000 1985 0.011 0.000 1986 0.009 0.000 1987 0.019 0.000 1988 0.014 0.000 1989 0.011 0.000 1990 0.014 0.000 1991 0.010 0.000 1992 0.016 0.000 1993 0.013 0.000 1994 0.024 0.000 1995 0.006 0.000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 # Email:info@insightengineering.net ,Re.e w., ,., . 1996 0.026 0.000 1997 0.012 0.000 1998 0.012 0.000 1999 0.001 0.000 2000 0.009 0.000 2001 0.006 0.000 2002 0.014 0.000 2003 0.013 0.000 2004 0.013 0.000 2005 0.014 0.000 2006 0.008 0.000 2007 0.009 0.000 2008 0.012 0.000 2009 0.008 0.000 2010 0.006 0.000 2011 0.008 0.000 2012 0.010 0.000 2013 0.009 0.000 2014 0.006 0.000 2015 0.017 0.000 2016 0.003 0.000 2017 0.019 0.000 2018 0.032 0.000 2019 0.034 0.000 2020 0.010 0.000 2021 0.016 0.000 2022 0.006 0.000 2023 0.013 0.000 2024 0.024 0.000 2025 0.010 0.000 2026 0.018 0.000 2027 0.008 0.000 2028 0.004 0.000 2029 0.013 0.000 2030 0.025 0.000 2031 0.007 0.000 2032 0.006 0.000 2033 0.006 0.000 2034 0.007 0.000 2035 0.028 0.000 2036 0.015 0.000 2037 0.003 0.000 2038 0.014 0.000 2039 0.001 0.000 2040 0.005 0.000 2041 0.008 0.000 2042 0.029 0.000 2043 0.013 0.000 2044 0.018 0.000 2045 0.011 0.000 2046 0.013 0.000 2047 0.008 0.000 2048 0.011 0.000 2049 0.010 0.000 2050 0.007 0.000 2051 0.012 0.000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 # Email:info@insightengineering.net 2052 0.007 0.000 2053 0.012 0.000 2054 0.014 0.000 2055 0.005 0.000 2056 0.004 0.000 2057 0.008 0.000 2058 0.009 0.000 Stream Protection Duration Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.0338 0.0000 2 0.0336 0.0000 3 0.0317 0.0000 4 0.0316 0.0000 5 0.0301 0.0000 6 0.0288 0.0000 7 0.0285 0.0000 8 0.0280 0.0000 9 0.0265 0.0000 10 0.0262 0.0000 11 0.0254 0.0000 12 0.0250 0.0000 13 0.0247 0.0000 14 0.0245 0.0000 15 0.0236 0.0000 16 0.0236 0.0000 17 0.0233 0.0000 18 0.0228 0.0000 19 0.0197 0.0000 20 0.0197 0.0000 21 0.0194 0.0000 22 0.0192 0.0000 23 0.0187 0.0000 24 0.0187 0.0000 25 0.0186 0.0000 26 0.0184 0.0000 27 0.0180 0.0000 28 0.0180 0.0000 29 0.0178 0.0000 30 0.0177 0.0000 31 0.0173 0.0000 32 0.0173 0.0000 33 0.0163 0.0000 34 0.0162 0.0000 35 0.0161 0.0000 36 0.0155 0.0000 37 0.0151 0.0000 38 0.0150 0.0000 39 0.0145 0.0000 40 0.0145 0.0000 41 0.0144 0.0000 42 0.0142 0.0000 43 0.0142 0.0000 44 0.0140 0.0000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 45 0.0139 0.0000 46 0.0134 0.0000 47 0.0132 0.0000 48 0.0131 0.0000 49 0.0131 0.0000 50 0.0130 0.0000 51 0.0129 0.0000 52 0.0128 0.0000 53 0.0128 0.0000 54 0.0127 0.0000 55 0.0126 0.0000 56 0.0125 0.0000 57 0.0125 0.0000 58 0.0124 0.0000 59 0.0124 0.0000 60 0.0124 0.0000 61 0.0122 0.0000 62 0.0122 0.0000 63 0.0122 0.0000 64 0.0119 0.0000 65 0.0117 0.0000 66 0.0117 0.0000 67 0.0117 0.0000 68 0.0115 0.0000 69 0.0114 0.0000 70 0.0113 0.0000 71 0.0112 0.0000 72 0.0112 0.0000 73 0.0112 0.0000 74 0.0112 0.0000 75 0.0111 0.0000 76 0.0111 0.0000 77 0.0110 0.0000 78 0.0109 0.0000 79 0.0109 0.0000 80 0.0108 0.0000 81 0.0106 0.0000 82 0.0105 0.0000 83 0.0105 0.0000 84 0.0104 0.0000 85 0.0104 0.0000 86 0.0103 0.0000 87 0.0103 0.0000 88 0.0102 0.0000 89 0.0102 0.0000 90 0.0102 0.0000 91 0.0101 0.0000 92 0.0100 0.0000 93 0.0100 0.0000 94 0.0099 0.0000 91 0.0099 0.0000 96 0.0095 0.0000 97 0.0094 0.0000 98 0.0094 0.0000 99 0.0093 0.0000 100 0.0091 0.0000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net ........... ,,,........... �w. m 101 0.0091 0.0000 102 0.0091 0.0000 103 0.0088 0.0000 104 0.0087 0.0000 105 0.0086 0.0000 106 0.0085 0.0000 107 0.0083 0.0000 108 0.0082 0.0000 109 0.0082 0.0000 110 0.0082 0.0000 111 0.0082 0.0000 112 0.0081 0.0000 113 0.0081 0.0000 114 0.0078 0.0000 115 0.0077 0.0000 116 0.0077 0.0000 117 0.0077 0.0000 118 0.0075 0.0000 119 0.0075 0.0000 120 0.0074 0.0000 121 0.0072 0.0000 122 0.0071 0.0000 123 0.0070 0.0000 124 0.0069 0.0000 125 0.0069 0.0000 126 0.0068 0.0000 127 0.0067 0.0000 128 0.0065 0.0000 129 0.0063 0.0000 130 0.0062 0.0000 131 0.0061 0.0000 132 0.0060 0.0000 133 0.0059 0.0000 134 0.0058 0.0000 135 0.0056 0.0000 136 0.0056 0.0000 137 0.0056 0.0000 138 0.0055 0.0000 139 0.0055 0.0000 140 0.0055 0.0000 141 0.0054 0.0000 142 0.0053 0.0000 143 0.0051 0.0000 144 0.0049 0.0000 145 0.0048 0.0000 146 0.0047 0.0000 147 0.0045 0.0000 148 0.0045 0.0000 149 0.0042 0.0000 150 0.0040 0.0000 151 0.0039 0.0000 152 0.0032 0.0000 153 0.0028 0.0000 154 0.0026 0.0000 155 0.0013 0.0000 156 0.0008 0.0000 PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net _W . 157 0.0006 0.0000 Stream Protection Duration POC #1 The Facility PASSED The Facility PASSED, Flow(cfs) Predev Mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0057 54379 0 0 Pass 0.0059 50140 0 0 Pass 0.0061 46193 0 0 Pass 0.0063 42741 0 0 Pass 0.0066 39581 0 0 Pass 0.0068 36713 0 0 Pass 0.0070 34098 0 0 Pass 0.0072 31742 0 0 Pass 0.0074 29689 0 0 Pass 0.0076 27767 0 0 Pass 0.0078 25907 0 0 Pass 0.0080 24195 0 0 Pass 0.0082 22609 0 0 Pass 0.0084 21073 0 0 Pass 0.0087 19636 0 0 Pass 0.0089 18326 0 0 Pass 0.0091 17121 0 0 Pass 0.0093 16064 0 0 Pass 0.0095 15051 0 0 Pass 0.0097 14071 0 0 Pass 0.0099 13152 0 0 Pass 0.0101 12326 0 0 Pass 0.0103 11533 0 0 Pass 0.0105 10861 0 0 Pass 0.0108 10245 0 0 Pass 0.0110 9694 0 0 Pass 0.0112 9204 0 0 Pass 0.0114 8648 0 0 Pass 0.0116 8208 0 0 Pass 0.0118 7757 0 0 Pass 0.0120 7349 0 0 Pass 0.0122 6991 0 0 Pass 0.0124 6617 0 0 Pass 0.0126 6309 0 0 Pass 0.0129 6000 0 0 Pass 0.0131 5731 0 0 Pass 0.0133 5457 0 0 Pass 0.0135 5213 0 0 Pass 0.0137 4983 0 0 Pass 0.0139 4765 0 0 Pass 0.0141 4548 0 0 Pass 0.0143 4340 0 0 Pass 0.0145 4136 0 0 Pass 0.0147 3947 0 0 Pass 0.0150 3793 0 0 Pass 0.0152 3649 0 0 Pass PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net 0.0154 3508 0 0 Pass 0.0156 3374: 0 Pass 0.0158 3275 0 0 Pass 0.0160 3167 0 0 Pass 0.0162 3073 0 0 Pass 0.0164 2983 0 0 Pass 0.0166 2898 0 &' Pass 0.0168 2807 0 0 Pass 0.0170 2718 0 0 Pass 0.0173 2619 0 0 Pass 0.0175 2521 0 0 Pass 0.0177 2426 0 0 Pass 0.0179 2317 0 0 Pass 0.0181 2217 0Y Pass 0.0183 2129 0 0 Pass 0.0185 2027 0 Pass 0.0187 1961 0 0 Pass 0.0189 1898 0 Pass 0.0191 1833 0 Pass 0.0194 1764 �j 0 Pass 0.0196 1691;1 0 Pass 0.0198 1636 0 0 Pass 0.0200 1575 0 0 Pass 0.0202 1510 0 0 Pass 0.0204 1456 0 0 Pass 0.0206 1397 0 0 Pass 0.0208 1338 0 0 Pass 0.0210 1278 i; 0 Pass 0.0212 1221 0 0 Pass 0.0215 1173 C Pass 0.0217 1126 0 0 Pass 0.0219 1082 0 0 Pass 0.0221 1033 0 0 Pass 0.0223 987 0 0 Pass 0.0225 938 0 0 Pass 0.0227 904 07 Pass 0.0229 863 C) 0 Pass 0.0231 812 0 0 Pass 0.0233 778 0 f:i Pass 0.0236 742 0 Pass 0.0238 703 0 0 Pass 0.0240 657' 0 Pass 0.0242 616 0 0 Pass 0.0244 584 0 l Pass 0.0246 547 0 0 Pass 0.0248 507 0 0 Pass 0.0250 460 0 Pass 0.0252 415 0 0 Pass 0.0254 387 0 0 Pass 0.0257 360 0 0 Pass 0.0259 339 0 0 Pass 0.0261 303 �'. 0 Pass 0.0263 286 0 0 Pass 0.0265 266 0 0 Pass PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email: info@insightengineering-net Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC #1 On-line facility volume: 0 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. LID Report LID Technique Used for Total Volumn Volumn Infiltration Cumulative Percent Water Quality Percent Comment Treatment? Needs Through Volumn Volumn Volumn Water Quality Treatment Facility (ac -ft.) Infiltration Infiltrated Treated (ac -ft) (ac -ft) Credit Permeable Pavement. ....... POCY �� ...-_. , -- 228.38..... 250.97 250.99 Y 99.99 250.99 99.99 Treat. Credit Total Volume Infiltrated 228.38 250.97 250.99 99.99 250.99 251 / 251 - 1OTreat. Credit - 1000 Compliance with LID Standard 8 Duration Analysis Result = Passed Perind and Impind Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying documentation are provided 'as -is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by End User. Clear Creek Solutions Inc. and the governmental licensee or sublicensees disclaim all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions Inc. be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions Inc. or their authorized representatives have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Software Copyright © by Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. 2005-2017; All Rights Reserved. PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net MEMORANDUM IF Date: June 5, 2017 To: Brad Shipley, Associate Planner From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN20170017 — Design review for 11 -Unit Development Mietzner Brothers :Properties — 8609 244th St SW Engineering has reviewed the subject design review application. The information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Existing frontage improvements will need to be removed and replaced to comply with City standards and ADA requirements. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. Thank you. City of Edmonds SNOHOmis" COUNTY J ��//�j�i/ / i/�//, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 Brad Shipley City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Shipley: Providing quality water, power and service at a competitive price thUAWWWRAW SERVICES COUNTER May 18, 2017 Reference Number: 8609, 8611 & 8615 244th Street, Edmonds District DR Number: 17-094 The District presently has sufficient electric system capacity to serve the proposed development. However, the existing District facilities in the local area may require upgrading. Existing PUD facilities and easements may need modifications or relocations at the developer's expense. Please note that electrical service to four houses west of the above - referenced property originates from the referenced property, and service must be maintained at the developer's expense. Any relocation, alteration or removal of District facilities to accommodate this project shall be at the expense of the project developer, and must be coordinated with the PUD in advance of final design. Please include any utility work in all applicable permits. Cost of any work, new or to upgrade, existing facilities that are required to connect this proposed development to the District electric system shall be in accordance with the applicable District policies. The District policy requires the developer to provide a 10 -foot easement and an 8 -foot clearance between any building/structures and transformers/switch cabinets upon its property for underground electrical facilities that must be installed to serve the proposed development. Please contact the District prior to design of the proposed project. For information about specific electric service requirements, please call the District's Plat Development Team at (425)783-4350. Sincerely, Mark A. Oens Senior Manager Planning, Engineering, & Technical Services Cc: Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC 1802 — 751h Street S.W.. Everett, WA w 98203 l Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1107 • Everett, WA • 98206-1107 425-783-4300 9 Toll-free in Western Washington at 1-877-783-1000, ext. 4300 • www.snopud.com ")C. 1 %9 April 18, 2017 Brian Kalab ATTACHMENT #7 CITY OF EDMONDS 1215 th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 . Fax: 425.771.0221 * Web: www.edmondswa. ov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT o PLANNING DIVISION Insight Engineering Co. P.O. Box 1478 Everett, WA 98206 Brian@insightengineering.net Subject: COMPLETE APPLICATION — DESIGN REVIEW FOR ELEVEN MULTI -FAMILY TOWNHOME UNITS (FILE NO. PLN20170017) Dear Mr. Kalab, Thank you for submitting the required documentation and application fees for the above - referenced permit; the application is complete in accordance with ECDC 20.02.002. As a result, the City will proceed with issuing public notice of the project per ECDC 20.03. As project review moves forward, additional information or clarification could be requested per ECDC 20.02.003. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425)'771-0220. Cc: Mike Mietzner Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC 11611 Airport Rd, Suite B-1 Everett, WA 98204 Mikem@mietznergroup.com Notice of Application and SEPA Determination File Number PLN20170017 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Proposal: Application for design of eleven (11) new two-story detached single-family homes. Each unit will include an attached two car garage. General design review applications that trigger SEPA review are Type III -B decisions, which require a public hearing and decision by the Architectural Design Board (ADB). The site is located within the Multiple Residential (RM) zone. Name of Applicant: Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC. Location: 8609/8611/8615-244"' St SW, Edmonds, WA File No.: PLN20170017 Date of Application: March 21, 2017 Date of Notice: May 2, 2017 Requested Permits: General Design Review Required Studies: Unknown. Date of Completeness: April 18, 2017 Other Required Permits: Building Permit. Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Determination and Environmental Checklist. Comments on Proposal Due:qy qQ!] (see public hearing information below). Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Office hours are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:30 a.m. to noon or online through the City's website at l ttl : /Biga,llt'lts ediiiondsmr�+'� tts iti;rcl'1• Search for permit PLN20170017. City Contact: Brad Shipley, (425) 771-0220, brad.shipley@edmondswa.gov *SEPA NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE* *NOTICE OF APPLICATION ON REVERSE SIDE* STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Lead Agency: The City of Edmonds is SEPA lead agency for the proposed eleven (11) new two-story detached single-family homes at 8609/8611/8615-244"' St SW (File No. 1'LN20170017). SEPA Determination: Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11-340(2) for the above project. Date of Issuance: May 2, 2017 SEPA Comments: May 17, 2017 SEPA Appeal Deadline: June 1 _201 7 at 4:00 mil. Appeals must be filed in writing citing the specific ----111111",.......................... reasons for appeal with the required fee to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 – 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. FILE NO.: PLN20170017 APPLICANT: Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC,. DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND SEPA DETERMINATION On the 30th day of April 2017, the attached Notice of Application and SEPA Determination was posted in compliance with ECDC 20.03.002 at the subject site of the above -referenced application. I, Brad Shipley, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 30th day of April, 2017 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed:, igacd.. FILE NO.: PLN20170017 APPLICANT: MIETZNER BROTHERS PROPERTIES, LLC, DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 1" day of May, 2017, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 -feet of the property that is subject of the application referenced above. The names were provided by the applicant. I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 1s` day of May, 2017, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: i , Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH755582 PLN20170017 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/02/2017 and ending on 05/02/2017 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is SWQ4:-_-,, ry Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of w Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds -LEGAL ADS 114101416 DIANE CUNNINGHAM DEBRA ANN GRIGG Notary Public State of Washington My Commission Expires October 31. 2017 CITY Ct E1aMON1aS �.t1 1R9 a1fJN1wttl9f �1't-WAkt11J1f1g13 91I�+rNk 91RIB e� rT1 E ar�xMIt,nTl8N PWri�st ary tt6l tlalwd F rikple-lufli , milyhohl�rsEw�.r„th rciuIntv+V6dpulrkchc 4e11) tlan w{tQ Io ,j two car gnu ige General t9t wqo review a}royalCr",aaldaxa6s Mat viq prcrr ;k::PA romw mire Type m- d rs;C ur vmhuch eliquire a fluid hearing and 00q� inahirl by the A,chbloLc ntd L5use4Jwr dauuar,9 fb+rl'1TIDi, The site is Ita'aaiad within the MarWple R'~xoPklamial M-2 4} Rtmzone y#a i1 �f. l�tlJ ual q Mrd Gxner rJunme s Prayulrrtoad ,I.C. lu T7Q61y¢52w1a1tltlSiSW toads, WA `". u6 Pa L&kU9tTh:a9atltla2i,20.Pok7 f"",9L Q1S E9Rw G flM92,2P9 U 11T, :E9J.'dtiNCW r�retg�Faeuu�;�eVvrit9�ivauuroi �� fluaiuluk�ri�k��¢teXt Iew Checkllst. !"ArV l9e u$R:in hlrif the Ifk'If 9u4 41mttra1 ant aun 911Vd fd�JjallP aY fYpOY P�;PI,tlf9��g 91'6e yd IT�AMI� 1'd;an NtlpdMnM1 lA P'C Id'..4g1 tlN 4M'r M't,R uA'U9tlL hV o9ltlt Mhap 914tlJw h'BCe lT6 Any hl Wra,6q'p4. neid Iegim0 �l a Copy of 0"o ata N"rr•kin On tht, app'lW,uDr'aa":. I k¢ , k, 2y may t4 1Af@! 01101fc N.ayalg9l as 6b1F al aoy 11 bo Pilo, Ger 0 o Ogxmixj W the rucki Pt cl aao Lappa Nt',r Pow IAwefY„Uni look 010"MM), al auyy, of a1 ✓ryyd in)(4w Poem Pi vdi 8 wrl Omar illy V'.h Pq,V GPkid, rdirlQ to idle dicrr"taws fin h6a. protect prm9r9 rlurly hn¢kaes Of rrl hurt w. ride Inad kuu Ft C1Cr r1h. A,cP17lluvo slartulunlf to mil ala an a.'kdrelmtl0alleuut rappeatl. thlarluttltl 0n Agra mis CCuaw.IdLahaent e17plicaat"sOo Pan he V'46WOU 09oulatndd at mo COY of alrtrowpnds PJeae9ulamerwl ;SelrraAti T7op aehnena, 9:11 • 691 Ave,N, hot' tts are 6A�n,dayce�, 1"k,tiWays VhhtrlAa" and f=a9daya 9rrim b.(Jg a,rwa, In 4",l0 ji,rb, awnd Wodulesrlly,s PtOrh 810 re,h). To wlaronw, Of 011Mua "IrouYlI ov edyas vwu9WAO a9 4aWy Q(tIq+l1s] Rtad9 Sh4pfay, (0 15) 771-0220, 4uedh��rrda uadnumd9wa gov STATE HNVIIt,)3N ENTAL P011. WY ACT f, Tf'VfxJap NOTICE MI"TIG KrED IDLPAW NATVt0F NOI6 GNIi ICANCE l,,yay ¢yg„{ur,y The City rag '2r9revnha9 iw SEPA lead xnwluy 9Crt yH1�PY� fro taadt +sarsur Q1 t; r: twn•sltsry detached 6n !e atll6aIV homes el tffi'Ed17VIStr9 91lJkr9 v 24utypr Irl a'y7 qW@Ee IVo FyLN201 AiW�dt tp ggaP.CYLu1161Wd.1adeCB Nrahce lc� tierce&by qpt+e9.al"I t0uaq 9Paa r, PCp� M1u9' ff,ltllnnnat,. t nr It 11 w VRala't!tl'IaC4aItSs9,P4trt6'u6.IrJGtIiV�xi,a1dP,','f'+ r"LpNu.k uarcnDee "dYV9$, t 07 9 9 : I��ST�a6 NTr 11°le afTr,uu raueTl;r t. LYa1tA u3 VSaerpBtL� hAdtry T t11 A 5ffA?:m-1Plhy^1ts May 17 2017 ,,,Lf,AJhl.9tT t, U l J �1 � .� yip h hdxl lar ss,9 he bledl to w69 ng catling Che, oott rhr re,t$Qr s. or nµrhraaI Valine tetra uaagrrured fee 10 11fro Hedyy of 1.dratranafµ Planning Dwvasirin, 1°21 - bth Ave, N, Ps"t'Jrumirs. WA 91NS020 Ilka 1a!rd: May 2 2017, f,', DI17 o- 112 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Application for design of eleven (11) new two-story detached single-family homes. Each unit will include an attached two car garage. General design review applications that trigger SEPA review are Type III -B decisions, which require a public hearing and decision by the Architectural Design Board (ADB). The site is located within the Multiple Residential (RM -2.4) zone. Proponent: MIETZNER BROTHERS PROPERTIES, LLC. Location of proposal, including street address if any: 8609/8611/8615-244t" St SW, Edmonds, WA Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS,. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by JUNE 1, 2017. Project Planner: Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1425-771-0220 Date: April 28, 2017 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, anager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than June 1, 2017. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on May 2, 2017, at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAnit�pc.wa.aoy). XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at ww wry twd _q_Wa, ov through the Permits Online link. Search for file number PLN20170017. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division — located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: Page 1 of 2 SEPA DNS 4/28/17 SEPA XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Email: SEPAut7a @ cy.wg,g v XX COMCAST Outside rlant Engineer, North Region 1525 75t St. SWSte 200 Everett, WA 98203 XX Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Headquarters Station No. 1 Attn.: Director of Fire Services 12310 Meridian Avenue South Everett, WA 98208-5764 XX XX XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation Attw Ramin Pa. ooki SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. XX PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 City of Shoreline Attn.: Permit Services Manager 17500 Midvale Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133-4905 Edmonds School District No. 15 Attn.: Stephanie Hall 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Community Transit Attn.: Kate Tourtellot 7100 Hardeson Road Everett, WA 98203 XX Puget Sound Partnership 326 East D St. XX Olympic View Water & Sewer District Tacoma, WA 98421 818 28th St. SW M r ha�enge osg.wa rtgy Edmonds, WA 98026 XX DNR SEPA Center XX Puget Sound Energy P.O. Box 47015 Attn: David Matulich Olympia, WA 98504-7015 PO Box 97034, M/S BOT -1G SEPACENTER tNR.'4M1+'A.GOV Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 d_ vid.rnatgjichApse t XX Puget Sound Regional Council Attn.: S.R.C. XX M.L. Wicklund 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Snohomish Co. PUD Seattle, WA 98104-1035 PO Box 1107 Everett, WA 98206-1107 XX Snohomish County Public Works 3000 Rockefeller M/S 607 XX Department of Archaeology & Historic Everett, WA 98201 Preservation P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Attachments 0 SEPA Checklist Page 2 of 2 SEPA DNS 4/28/17 SEPA ATTACHMENT #8 E #P71 A CSI t f,, CITY OF EDMONDS 1 1�, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part 13) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND �, I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: _ 244th St. r 2. Name of applicant: Mietzner Brothers Properties. LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: 11611 Airport Road, Suite B-1, Everett, WA 98204 - (425) 212-2490 Contact: Brian Kalab, P.E. / Insight Enqineerinq Company - P.O. Box 1478, Everett, WA 98206 - (425) 303-9363 4. Date checklist prepared: February13, 2017 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds Revised on 9/16/16 SEPA Page I of 27 wei is of ail � 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable); Construction would Mart 1.V�7.on rec,��,. necessary development, buildinq and qradinq permits. (S'1"A1«MM COMMENTS).� _. .... 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future expansion at this time. (STAFF COMMI --"8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A full drainage report and critical areas studywillbe submitted along with this Environmental Checklist. (STAFF COMMENTS), -'�'9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no known applications pending at this time. (STANF:F COM Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 2 of 27 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permits by City of Edmonds SEPA Determination by City of Edmonds Grading permits by City of Edmonds ,-""l 1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for 11 new townhome units on approximately 0.88 acres. (STAFF fwOM --1-12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The property is located at 8609 244th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98206 Located in the SW 1/4, SEC 31, T.27N„ R.04E, W.M. Tax Account #: 00463303100103 (STAFF 4":+11C+wlME a Revised on 9119116 SF'PA Page 3 of 27 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth '--� a. General description of the site (circle one) ° EIling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: (STA FF CO Z --b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 8% (STAFF C0MMEN mac. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Alderwood-Urban land complex as per the soil conservation service soil survev of Snohomish (STAFF N C("11'vll' EN L''d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity, _ (S"I'"Ake'°fu :t'II'i+1M Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 4 of 27 e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Road and buildings sites would be cleared, gradedand compacted as necessary to achieve properper g� transition, drainage and structural stability. Approximately 1,092 CY of material will be cut, and 1,220 CY will be used for fill, The source of fill will be suitable fill imported from an on-site material or legal source. (STA FF COM1'1✓'iEl 'rs) (/ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, the potential for on-site erosion well Increase in the short term- wheresods are exposed du rinq site preparation and construction, (STAFF COMMENTS) About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? AApproxtrrtat l^y�of the site would be covered' b residential buildin s roads drivewa s and site impervious surface. ('STAFF COM'ME _'__�h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion sedimentation control lan fTESCPI will be submitted to the city for approval prior to any construction activities. Construction phase erosion control will include the use of silt fences, hay bales, and catch basin AIR protection as necessary to minimize the impacts of erosion on off-site areas and on-site systems. (S'I`rtWFF COM What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short Term Construction lm acts: Short -terata emissions and odors would resmlt from site m arat4on and consi'urcdion activities Sotto rices of short-tefm emissions and orators include durst generated by gr'adiing, activities and combustion emissions from heavy equipment It is anucipated that these impacts qguld Long erm Air Quality Impacts: Long-term urnpacts would result from increased traffic to the site, resulting in a slight increase in carbon monoxide levels. Dorna;sticalt roduced oVWutants wouaid he enarated after the residential structures are occu bed. These orn apts are not ex' ecir d tisa be sl rulfioane. (STAFF COMM Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 5 of 27 L/ b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known, (STAFF COMM t c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: Construction Impact Mitigation: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available and reasonable means of controlling air pollution, g dust Consaact6on impacts would not besigrwRtAceett and the poRentdaN for naives to be carruad off tl�e sate by e�uGang fra+oks could be controlled vncludin, with the construction of a gravel entrance. Add'utucnalfy„ equipment used for site preparation will be serviced and maintained in good operating condition impacts ......... _.. to lessen Long Term Aa is from his source. Water wall also be used for dust control when necessary, tipation: Long-term air quality impacts are no expected to exceed regulated amounts, (STAFF C'OMi4 E .'-" 3. WATER / a. Surface: W!(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (STAP F C°CD!N1M. �2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (S"1`1""F COMM (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No wetlands on site: N/A (STAT F COM Y' Revised on 9/19/16 SE PA Page 6 of 27 (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. _ -- (STAFF C4D9'1'1 ^if N'(S) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. (STA FF (,.Odd M ENNF s). .�..�... ...... ....... ✓(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Waste materials would not be discharged into surface waters as a result of these projects. It is possible that di c ggs of�tro&Lkr'n _ .ts and cfl� r srabstanc s relgted to automobiles frorr%..!he� ._ rea� s r -A result from the surface flow of stormwater. However, implementation of the drainage plan would minimize this occurence by providing water quality in the stormwater drainage facilities, (91-A FCClM.iV1l"N"IS) Ground: /(1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF F C"C1Mtl"v11«.l` TS) Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 7 of 27 (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The project would be served by Olympic View Water District for sanitary sewer services. No waste material would be discharged from spetic tanks or other sources. (STAFF COMMENTS)_ ... C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Run-off from proposed impervious surfaces would be collected via conveyance systems with roadside and detained. The run-off will be discharged into the existing surface water conveyance systems (i.e. pipes, ditches, etc). For run-off volume, pipe and detention sizing please refer to the civil plan, reports, and calculations. (STAFF COMM (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Oil, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas could potentially enter the ground or downstream surface waters through surface water run-off. Implementation of the proposed water quality features of the detailed drainage plan will remove most waste materials, as consistent with stormwater management requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) (") Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No, the proposaldoesnot alter or otherwise affect drainaqe patterns in the vicinity of the site. (S"1"rf►FF COMMF, Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 8 of 27 ,/d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities meeting City limited existing native vegetation consisting of trees, groundcover and grass. State standards would be employed to control surface water runoff during construction and after development. (STAFF COMM. �4. Plants / a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs X grass._.. pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: _ ..... (STAFF COMMENTS) /b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Limited existing native vegetation consisting of trees, groundcover and grass. (S'I'AFF COMMENTS) . . . . ........... .......- Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 9 of 27 e --c- List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. /--"'d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All areas, exclusive of buildings and parking, will be landscaped by subsequent owners/occupants. _Hydroseeding may possibly occur on barren areas per County reauirements. (STAFF COMM e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. No noxious weeds or invasive species known to be on or near the site. 5. Animals /a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle songrrc's, her:Robins Crows and . mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver o er: Rodents and Squirrels fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 10 of 27 (STA FFCOMM ENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or andanaered species known to be on or near the site, (STAFF COMM ,,---C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. -ALQLW. Pacific Flvaway. (STAFF Co M M E N'rs), . . ..... . ...... .. .......... Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMM) N I , S) -"' e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. OSTAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 11 of 27 6. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. At the time of completion of development: -Electricity for lighting, as well as electricity and/or natural gas would be used for heating. (S]AFF COMM IxN`rS, b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No effect. (STA FF CO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: At the time of construction, the requirements of the International Building Code would be satisfied in the construction of the residential buildings. Energy conserving materials would be utilized wherever possible throughout the construction process. (STAF f" C' i UNI") ................ 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. The project would not create any environmental health hazards. Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 12 of 27 (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. No known or possible contamination at the site from past or present uses. (S 1'A FF C'0 M, (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No known existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect the project development and design of this property, (STAFF COMMENTS) - (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Fuel will be used during the project's development, construction and at any time during the operating life of the oroiect. (STA FF COMM ) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Hazardous waste cleanup of any fuel spillage associated with construction of this proposal. (STA FF CO M Rdrl'NTw'.3)...... ...... Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 13 of 27 `(5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: At the time of construction, the project site would adhere to the Contractor's Safety Plan and Program. (STAFF COMMENTS) ®' . Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on existing roads near the site would be audible. There are no other sources of noise that will affect this project. (STAFF COMMENTS) ._ .......�. _.._. _.... (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Short term noise impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during daylight hours, Construction noise is generated by heavy equipment, hand tools and the transporting of construction equipment. Lonq.term impacts would be those ,associated with increase of site users and additional traffic. The increase in noise would be typical „of surrounding single tgML1y residences. (:S 1"AFF COMM (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: At the time, construction would comply with the City of Edmonds noise ordinance. (STAFF COMMENTS) --- Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 14 of 27 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The site is currently developed with 3 single family homes. The development pattern of the areas to the north, west and south are single gle family residential in Shoreline. There are 3 condos to the east containing 6 units each. (ST FFC;C) MMEMS) �/b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? To our knowledge, the site has not been used for agriculture. (STA F CW(:bi! M ✓ (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. (STAFF CC MNIl' N7 eS) c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently developed with three single family homes. (STAFF C"'CJMlwvlF Revised on 9119116 SR'PA Page 15 of 27 .,raw ted, Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existina structures will be demolished. (S1 AIS"I+ C:;`OM M / e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (STA IT COMM EN -'-�f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Multi -Family, High Density (STAFF COMM ENTS).— ............. ........ 4 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF COMM h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. No. (STAFF COM Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 16 of'27 p, Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 2.7 per residence = 11x2.7=29.7 (STA Ff:+f')MM J, Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? To our knowledge, no people will be displaced. (STA 1,F COw4 � k, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A (STAFF t;O&'" NIld.l I.S)_. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be controlled by City of Edmonds zoning requirements, (STAFF COMM n. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A (,13,TAFF f;OG"t'll""IENT Revised on 9/19/16 SR'PA Page 17 of 27 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. mmAt the time of development, the project's proposal would provide 11 new, middle income, town homewunits. (STAFF COM b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 3 middle income units will be eliminated. (STAFF COMM L,"**'c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (STAFF COM NI ENT°S) 10. Aesthetics tea. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The residential structures would comply with the heiaht requirements of the Citv of Edmonds code. The exterior structures would be principally wood and masonry. (STAFF COM ME Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 18 of 27 Z b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The finished project would not obstruct the surrounding view; however, the view would be altered due to the development of the site. fc. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The development design and appearance of the proposed project would-be compatible with other uses in the area. Lot landscaping would be designed to complement the structures and site layout. Native vegetation would be retained and enhanced where practical. (S TAIL°IST COMM FNTS) , __ ..._.. __.._. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b Light and glare would mainly be produced by exterior and interior residential lighting during evening hours and vehicle headlights traveling to and from the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Li ht from the finished voiect would not interfere with the views or cause hazards. Exterior licghtin wg axil be typical of a residenital neighborhood. (STA FF COMM What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No off-site sources of light or glare would affect this proposal. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 19 of 27 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed. (SrFAFF COMM 12. Recreation ,, a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City parks, golf courses, playgrounds at school facilities, boating and water related activities are available in the area. (STAFF COMM ia. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. None are displaced. (S"1'AI+FC.;OMi fl c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Park mitigation fees in accordance with City of Edmonds code totals are offered by the applicant. (STA f<.F C'0 C1°l' Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 20 of 27 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation �. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. There are no known areas reserved for preservation. (STAFF fm"'t}M b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. There are no known archeological artifacts on the site. (STA1+F [ Iwf41M C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. N/A (S71 -AFF i"°GMl"iriENT )_ d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. This project would not adversly affect any historical resources, therefore, no mitigation of impacts are being proposed. (STA FF CO M'. Revised on 9119/16 SEPA Page 21 of 27 14. Transportation Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site fronts, and will take access from, 244th St. (STAFF C'CIIIfvhENTS) W_ ..................... . .......... L--'6-. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is currently served by public transit 0.1 miles away at 244th St. SW & Whitman Ave. N. (Stop #1710) (S'rA FF f:"011+l.IVl E NI S How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? 2 parkina saaces per residence: 11x2.22 new narkina spaces (STA FF CO d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will not require any new public roads. Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 22 of 27 (STAFF COMM e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFFCOMM 'tl'i'1 f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? 9.52 ADT x 11 (new) units = 104.72 ADT (STAFF COMM L --g" Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. (STAT+ y ICOM EN ) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The development would be required to pay traffic mitigation fees. Payment will be made to the City of Edmonds for traffic mitiqation fees. Revised on 9/19116 SEPA Page 23 of 27 (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes; however, the level is not expected to be significant. (STAFF COMMENTS) �.__. _ ........ �b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Proposal will generate new tax revenue. Payment to the Edmonds School District for school mitigation fees Park mitigation fees and traffic mitigation fees as required by code. (STAFF COMMENTS) .............. .... ...... 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sant ary sewer, eptic system, other: (S''1"AFl+ COMM b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA !'",rr= 24 of 27 Electricity: Snohomish County PUD Gas: Puget Sound Energy _ Water & Sewer: Olympic View Water and Sewer District Telephone: Frontier Communications/Cable Television: Comcast Refuse: Waste Management (s,rA C+"F t."+V M EN I'S C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. m. 3��)/1-7 — ... .... ��._ ...... m__— — _. _ _......._.__ Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 25 of 27 1. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) 1ecau,.`e these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the ecaviron: exit. When ans eriiig these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would afle:c ,lie item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the p 11" o."I be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous s stances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce su)qi increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? 3. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or ma ' ie life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Revised on 9119116 SEPA Page 26 of 27 4. How would the proposal .be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species babikat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to proteisnch resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: �w ....... --- _........_... 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect I id and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing pla s? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use ira;pacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation . public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7., Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws o' re luirements for the protection of the environment. Revised on 9/19/16 SEPA Page 27 of 27