STF20100009.pdfr
Of
E� OHO
CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED
FS1 1 seo 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FEB 2 g 2010
PUM EPT.
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: (File No. BLD-2009-0793) Application for building permit to allow
approximately 860 cubic yards of grading at the subject site.
Proponent: Greg Guillen, CG Engineering
Location of proposal, including street address if any: Parcel addressed as 19205 Olympic View Drive
(Tax ID# 00434600008301). The site is approximately 400' south of 1901h Place SW.
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The City of Edmonds, acting as lead agency for this proposal, has determined that the proposed project
does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. This information is available
to the public on request.
This is not an approval of the proposed action, only a determination of the potential environmental impacts
of the proposal. The City of Edmonds has determined that the environmental impacts are adequately
addressed through the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Edmonds Community
Development Code governing land -use standards, construction, clearing, grading and stormwater control,
and critical areas. This determination is issued on the basis of compliance of the proposal with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and standards.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 21 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by March 15, 2010.
Project Planner: Mike Clugston, Planner
Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 (425-771-0220
Date: February 22, 2010 Signature:'
XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the
appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form
no later than March 15, 2010.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on March 1, 2010, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the
Checklist.
Page I of 2
SEPA DNS BLD-2009-0793.DOC
2/23/10.SEPA
0 0
• Mailed SEPA Determination to properties within 300 feet of the site.
• Mailed SEPA Determination and the Environmental Checklist to the following:
XX Environmental Review Section
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX COMCAST
Outside Plant Engineer, North Region
410 Valley Ave NW #12
Puyallup, WA 98371-3317
XX Puget Sound Energy
Attn: Elaine Babby
PO Box 90868, M/S XRD-1 W
Bellevue, WA 98009
pc: File No. BLD-2009-0793
SEPA Notebook
0
W
U
0-
0
XX Dean Saksena, Senior Manager
Snohomish Co. PUD
PO Box 1107
Everett, WA 98206-1107
XX Greg Guillen
CG Engineering
250 4`h Ave. S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
XX Jared Underbrink
CG Engineering
2504 Ave. S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
City of Edmonds Zoning Map, November 18, 2008
Page 2 of 2
SEPA DNS BLD-2009-0793.DOC
2/23/10.SEPA
OF EDO P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
�sr. 1 g90
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
Wilson Residence
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant: Greg Quillen, PE, SE, CG Engineering
3. Address and phone number of ap licant and contact person:
CG Engineering, 250 4th Tve S, Suite 200, Edmonds 98020 - 425.778.8500
Owner: DJ Wilson. 425.361.2118
4. Date checklist prepared: Nov 18, 2009; revised Feb 2 2010 Q11 per Review Comments
5. Agency requesting checklist: City o Edmonds
RESUB
FEB 112010
Page 1 of24 BUILDING DEPAR-t MENT
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006 CITY OF EDMONDS
0 0
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Owner would prefer to start as soon as project is permitted and weather conditions allow.
(STAFF
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. Possibly build a single family residence in the future.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 2 of 24
sepa checklisl - handwriteAm 4 19 2006
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Grading permit is pending.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Regrading of the property and a short 3 foot high rockery along the north property line.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Location of the proposed project: 19205 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds 98020
The North 80 feet of the West 120 feet of Tract 84, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according
to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, Page 76, Records of said County.
Subject o easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 3 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
• 0
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Rolling, hilly, steep slope
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
15-25%
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Sandy clay loams
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Not to our knowledge.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 4 of 24
sepa checklist - handw ite.doc:4.29.2006
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
855 cubic yards of cut, 5 cubic yards of fill.
Will likely use material excavated from the site as fill.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion could occur. Appropriate measures and erosion control details are indicated
on the plans.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
An existing shed will remain, approximately 1 % of the total area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
BMPs for erosion control including but not limited to silt fences, hay bales will be
used to prevent sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer
system or su ace waters. Slope areas will be protected with plastic covering when
construetmon is not occurring for more than two days..
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Some dust from grading equipment during construction. No changes after project is
complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 5 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.docA.19.2006
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 6 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
•
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 7 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.191006
0 •
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Runoff will be directed into an appropriately designed storm water disposal
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
BMPs including but not limited to silt fences. hay bales will be used to prevent
sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer system or surface
waters. Slope areas will be protected.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 8 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
• 0
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
X other types of vegetation: Berry vines
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Most vegetation will be removed when grading begins.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 9 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
0 •
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
Grass seed will be spread after the project is complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
X birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 10 of 24
sepa checklist • handwrite.dmA.19.2006
• 0
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 11 of 24
ceps checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Construction equipment noise.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 12 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
On the short term, delivery trucks, grading equipment. Work will be completed
per the City of Edmond's work hour requirement.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction noise kept to a minimum during allowable day time hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Single family residences.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 13 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.docA.19.2006
C. Describe any structures on the site.
No structures other than a small storage shed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Southwest County UGA; Incorporated City (Edmonds)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Unknown.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 14 of 24
sepa checklist • handw ite.doc:4.19.2006
0 0
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Family dynamics will not change for this project.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 15 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite doc4 19.2006
E
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 16 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
•
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not applicable -
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 17 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite doc-4 19.2006
•
0
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Less than a mile north to Hutt Park. Maplewood Park is 1 1/2 miles south of this
location.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 18 of 24
sepa checklist • handwriteAmA.19.2006
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
The closest public street is Olympic View Drive which the property faces. The
proposed access to the existing street system will not change. See attached site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklist - handwriteAmA.19.2006
0 •
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
0.30 miles to the nearest public transit stop.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
There may be some curb & gutter repairs.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 20 of 24
sepa checklist • handwote.dm:4.19.2006
0
0
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
No chan
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
Not applicable,
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
Page 21 of 24
sepa checklist - handwtiteAmA.19.2006
0
•
16. Utilities
a. Circle tilities currently available at the site
sanitary sewe septic system, other:
e ectricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
No other utilities will be needed at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
make its decision.
nj-y/. I /—
Signature of Proponent
I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
-Z —11-1 o
Date Submitted
4ev;ew.0—r bye- Reu;-tA�d
Page 22 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Page 23 of 24
sepa checklist - handwlite.dac:4.19.2006
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
Page 24 of 24
sepa checklist • handwrite.dm:4.19.2000
�5c�►k u liS 6eftt '400,cttscr" Aft Hr
l o l l of C t� m r'G �r� � w fir . c n? �+;c� s ►U R 19,O)W
P—ohnt- " (G) ave
f fttlinikI 1' 00tej�.r ,
RFceiV
Ep
MAR 112010
®EV,E
L COUNT SFCES
LATER
V& att
re, Wrihticj this Ictt ahc)u� .our cvitccrn of Fkz gr.,iclinci permit
T-il� Ncl. Bap-2occ(-o7y3 l oc.� ac.l at IrizG% ��t7m ,�c, �'t.Lw�� Cr. cfmcu s �:`� �d'o,�0
VVL WE, Piz oWn�-r for 26 ycgrs e f At prop r fy 141 rQc fly adiatzmt �r°Fer��
le b� c; c.la��t .i'o �fart�ed ctt,c� rook carp e f c, (i vi'r�c fer»_� �t huts eCC ft�1.+7f�y (iS
e4lctl serar-ires At !T (S !!v( 0aP, PROP C+���Y. 14 sta�ES ctre clear 'IV
.S Ito x s i'6 bac ale r i i t: iAi�e w <<bi r t& keep f �t e m -f n n {' S A- v tl kj b e rr l i-r b d w? (- l
our d r,v'e_wa-1 and +4e met— propes,,cI dr�vL, u1n`i . 4{,'C are su.r.L fr w.ld b ncfi 'All Of us
h 2tt lr�t �sf4 itboV�%,l�cr���G'r T G�� h��1c� {� r�ew �n�r uut�f(xE Gi t�%
edfvto,:cfc- res�v�isa6le- IttEre vre tV, r&,-Itire
tort(m It ��,��e Sc� l-GC %ullcczrt vv�ll ✓tcJ c��n� i'�{� r Iri ��kr pro��rf'� Ci�vc
i
cte.r'vtacir. �&E.. - .
T� are k Voc�
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH } S.S.
NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION
NAME OF APPLICANT: Greg Guillen
DATE OF APPLICATION: 1,116/09
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 2/19/10
DATE OF NOTICE: 3/1/10
FILE NO.: BLD-2009-0793
PROJECT LOCATION: 19205 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for building permit to allow
approximately 860 cubic yards of grading at the sub'ect site.
The parcel is zoned Residential Single Family (RS-12 .
REQUESTED PERMIT: SEPA Determinations are Type I permits
which are staff decisions that require public notice. Informa-
tion on this application can be viewed at the Cit of Edmonds
Development Services Dept., 121 5th Ave. N, fYdmonds, WA
98020.
OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Unknown.
REQUIRED STUDIES: Unknown.
EXISTNG ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS:
Critical Area Checklist, geotechnical report.
COMMENT PERIOD: Comments due by March 22 2010.
Any person has the right to comment on this application during
the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any
hearings, and, request a copy of the decision on the application.
The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the
closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if
any, or, if no open record pre -decision hearing is provided, prior
to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as
defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an adminis-
trative appeal.
-CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP
425-771-0220
clugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Published: February 25, 26, 2010.
Account Name: CG Engineering
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of
THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of
Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general
circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Courtof Snohomish County and that the notice
Notice of SEPA Determination
Greg Guillen
a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in
supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and
times, namely:
February 25, 2010, February 26, 2010
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th
day of February, 2010
Notary Public in and for
County.
Account Number: 106245
i
of %1Z y` , ��fa1~Vi
r
�p,�,��
nL&y1 er
'ltlirF 4F N'P_
0001686571
THIS IS A LEGAIDVERTISEMENT AND SHOULD BE BILLED TO THE APPLICANT
�r
-� CITY OF EDMONbS
NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION
NAME OF APPLICANT: Greg Guillen
DATE OF APPLICATION: 11/16/09
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 2/19/10
DATE OF NOTICE: 3/1/10
FILE NO.: BLD-2009-0793
PROJECT LOCATION: 19205 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for building permit to allow
approximately 860 cubic yards of grading at the
subject site. The parcel is zoned Residential
Single Family (RS-12).
REQUESTED PERMIT: SEPA Determinations are Type II permits which
are staff decisions that require public notice.
Information on this application can be viewed at
the City of Edmonds Development Services Dept.,
121 51h Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020.
OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Unknown.
REQUIRED STUDIES: Unknown.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTS: Critical Area Checklist, geotechnical report.
COMMENT PERIOD: Comments due by March 22, 2010. Any
person has the right to comment on this
application during the public comment period,
receive notice and participate in any hearings, and
request a copy of the decision on the application.
The City may accept public comments at any time
prior to the closing of the record of an open record
pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open record
pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the
decision on the project permit. Only parties of
record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have
standing to initiate an administrative appeal.
CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP
425-771-0220
clugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us
PUBLISH: 3/1/10
File Number: BLD-2009-0793
Applicant: Guillen
NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
I, Grea Gu i it eP1 , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say:
That on the day of , the attached Notice of SEPA
Determination was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, in accordance
with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.03.
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
Notary Public
State of Washington
ROSIN K GEVESNAUSEN
My MPanIfflent Explres Doc 28, 2011
i
Notary Pub i in n and for the State of Washington.
Residing at Simonds w ,
FILE NO.: BLD-2009-0793
APPLICANT: Guillen
NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
I, I'� YP� Cs u i I J�.g , first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say:
That on the _aWh day of 01 , I caused to be published in the Everett
Herald a legal Notice of SEPA Determination, in accordance with Edmonds
Community Development Code Chapter 20.03, a copy of which is attached.
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this a Vt day of ftb Yua V , 2010
Notary Public
$tath of W=Mdnpton
ROM K OMSMAUM14
My Pppoftnwt Expirm Doc 28, 201 t
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
Residing at Qmonc>s WA,
•
C�
O
c �
Ecu
-0
m rn
a o
C 7
a) U
O. C
E
.. c
a) Y
N E
U 0
G a
U >
G a
CMU
ca C
acc
U
U
O C
a f0
E
a)
N L
Q)
X
N
a)
L
4)
ci
4—
d
LL
L�.
a
a
a)
0)
0
O T
LL
w
EE LB
a
7 N
Z \J
w C
H d
n
C'
a) _ `
U (�//J��
a)
d c
O O a
0
(Da
a LA
:3
z� 7
L
U
a)
W
c
CD
m o
0 m
a2
2
J
vcc
N
a7
U
U
o
V
CD
LL
U
E
v
a)a
0
Za
0
7
N
m
O
T
a)
co
0
cc
E
O
LL
U)
IL
S
CITY 0 EDMONDS • 121 5`h AVENUE NORTHMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: 425.771.0220 • FAx: 425.771.0221 • WEB: www.ci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING • BUILDING
February 22, 2010
Jared Underbrink
CG Engineering
250 4`h Ave. South, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: SEPA NOTIFICATION — GRADING PERMIT AT 19205 OLYMPIC VIEW
DRIVE (BLD-2009-0794)
Dear Mr. Underbrink,
Thank you for responding to my plan review comments of December 2, 2009. With the updated
information, I have been able to issue a SEPA determination.
SEPA requires public notice and project applicants are now responsible for all notification
requirements for land use applications according to ECDC 20.03. This includes mailing out the
notice materials to adjacent property owners, publishing notice in the Everett Herald, and posting
the site itself.
To keep the project moving forward, notice for this project should be issued by Monday, March
1, 2010. With this cover letter is: 1) the SEPA determination, 2) legal notice for the Herald, 3) a
vicinity map, and 4) affidavits of posting, publishing and mailing.
The determination and vicinity map must be mailed to the property owners within 300 feet of the
subject site and posted on the sign at the site. Please use the following address for the return
address on the envelopes for the mailing: City of Edmonds, Planning Division, 121 - 5th Ave.
N, Edmonds, WA 98020. In addition to using this address for the return address, please also
mail a copy of the notice to my attention at the same address. When you mail the notices at the
Post Office, you will need to obtain a U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing containing the
names and addresses of all parties provided notice.
The attached legal notice must be provided to the Everett Herald by 3:00pm two business days
prior to publication. In addition to the provided text, the Herald will need your name for billing
as well as your phone number and address. You can submit the ad to the Herald in any of the
following ways: 1) via email to legals@heraldnet.com (a confirmation email will be sent within
24 hours of receipt), 2) via fax to 425-339-3438, 3) in person at 1213 California St, Everett, WA
98201, or 4) by mail to PO Box 930, Everett, WA 98206 attn: Legals. If you have any questions
for the Herald, you may contact Jody Knoblich at 425-339-3089 or legals@heraldnet.com.
A laminated determination and vicinity map must be attached to a blue sign and be posted at the
site by Monday, March 1" as well. You can pick up the laminated documents and blue sign from
me at the Development Services Department.
• 0
No later than 14 days after the required date of posting, publishing, and mailing (March I"), an
affidavit must be submitted to the City attesting that you completed each of the required methods
of notification. Additionally, you will need to submit the U.S. Postal Service Certificate of
Mailing for each of the addresses the notice of application was mailed to. You can drop those
documents by City Hall or mail them to my attention.
I will send notice to the appropriate agencies who may be interested in the SEPA determination.
If you have any questions on the noticing requirements, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or
via email at michael.clu sg tongei.edmonds.wa.us.
Sincerely,
Mike Clugston, AICP
Planner
Enclosures
Cc: Greg Guillen
CG Engineering
250 4`h Ave. South, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
-� of EI)M
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
DATE: Friday, March 26, 2010
PERMIT #: BLD20090793
PROJECT ADDRESS: 19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS
PROP OWNER DJ W MON
320 DAYTON ST
EDMONDS, WA 98020-
(425) 361-2118 E-4.
Date Description
Fee_Amou_nt'
Paid
Balance Due`
11/16/200 B-Building Plan Review Fee
$120.00
($120.00)
$0.00
9
11/16/200 X-Perm it Surcharge Fee
$15.00
$0.00
$15.00
9
11/16/200 B-Grading Permit Fee
$280.00
$0.00
$280.00
9
11/18/200 P-SEPA Review
$485.00
($485.00)
$0.00
9
Total Due: $900.00 ($605.00) $295.00
*FEES ARE ESTIMATED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED AT SUBMITTAL -SUBJECT TO CHANGE
rK lulnl !.a_ eft-VII I
Date Receipt # Nkthod/Payee Paid.
11/16/2009 REC050195 Auto/Wilson StrategicCommunications ($120.00)
B-Building Plan Review Fee ($120.00)
11/20/2009 REC050239 Auto/C G Engineering ($485.00)
P-SEPA Review ($485.00)
C 4 =--p
ENGINEERING
250 4th Ave. South, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425.778.8500
Fax: 425.778.5536
To:
City of Edmonds
Planning & Building Department
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
V r
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date
March 10, 2010
Job No.
09150.20
Attention
Mike Clu ston AICP
R
Wilson BLD-2009-0794
�V
AR 1
P
EPr
We are sending you
Attached 0
Under separate cover Via: USPS
Shop Drawings
0
Prints
0 Calculations
0 Copy of Letter
Original Drawings
Q
0 Floppies
the following items:
Specifications
Copies
Date
No.
Description
1
3/10/2010
Notice of SEPA Determination - Affidavit of Mailing
1
2/25/2010
Certificate of Bulk Mailing
1
3/10/2010
Notice of SEPA Determination - Affidavit of Publication
1
1 2/25/2010
Copy of Invoice from Everett Herald for Publication placed 2/25 & 2/26
These are transmitted as checked below:
0 For approval El No exception taken Resubmit copies for approval
Q For your use 0 Make corrections noted Submit copies for distribution
As requested 0 Revise and resubmit E] Return corrected prints
For review and signature M
Remarks
If you have any further questions, please give Jared Underbrink a call. Thank you.
Copy to: Signed Robin Geveshausen
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once.