Loading...
TIA worksheet.pdfIrk— I vy-j N, of Proposed Pj,ojccv Owner/Applivant Ov 77: �O k7b sireel/Mailing Iddress City Zip -- Applicant Coutact Person, 11 P, LeQ-v7-,r-v EAL) Name d- —&,- S,upet"Mailing Address -7 (1 1 1 cz City State Zip Tcleplloll,�,,: Traffic Eagincer who prepared theraffiv, Impact Analysis (ifapplicable): 4w Firm Name Contact NIamo -reiepimic: Im XP -A b -kg�yS. -rx-� THRESHOLD UEVETS OF ANALYSIS Project Traffic Levels S-ec!ioj),,s to Complete L Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 (),,Ily (Work,hccl/Chccklist) 11. More than 25 peak- IIOLII'tripSil CIICI','ItCel Alk Sections 1. PROM C'IA)Fscm-rION a1,0catioll - SLI'Cet address: 1,lc-1-1-A zrSite P1r-� kA V ��V) wo�) �yp, 11 a vhd�y map (Od 1111.) (ftp ---------- "I \-) 1). Specify Oxistill- land use: lipecillpropmed typeand size of development: m- mo d6 4yw Revis. W ol 0,2'VII) /,, 2 - hvilc hnvact fl,"wAshvel hf, v I e!l',5 d. Date constrtwtion will begin ond be completed: c, Define ivopmcd ac.cfc.ss locatiotts: 4— Z� o f*, Define proposod sight distance ;at site cgrcsN locaiiolls: 1� Ao 1 TIUP GENERATION Soureeshall he the Eighth Edition Of (fie 111stitote ol—Frallsportation L"'Ilgincers Gencrition walMal. I"01' illdepelIdUt 1-10C calculations, the current edition of the ITL manual may bO LISC(L AM'= Average Daily Traffic 0 PM Peak -how, trips (ANC noon orschool peak may, also apply as dirnted by the: (,ity [Ilgillccr) a. FIxisting Site TripGoneratim Table: PIM PQak-I,4ou)- Yrips Land Use Daily (A 7DT) IN OUT b, Proposed Pr(�jcct'Frip Generation Table: c, Nct'\1ewPj,ojcct'I'np( jencration Table: I'M Peak -l -lour Trips LaW Use Daily (ADT) -- Ti d. State assrsttaptic7tas aid methodology ror internal, link -diverted or lea, by trips: Lob flevisodol0"21'10 F.8"'! - Traffic hilpact "(no vi 11"orkshoo Page 2 of 5 I TRIP DISTRIBUTION P;� o Y-(,, � o� T?A RO-PN4. (lvc,parc and atticil a graphic shmving pROO wQ distribrahn perceninges and devclopments dint generate. over 75 palAou trips, tl)e City Engineer rewrves the right to rccluirc trip distribution to lw detannhwd migh use orme u, imme mom, 'MS,� 'ETV J, IMT, AC(, -R.()A0WA'V/DRWVEWAYS AND SAF ,i . Have sigin- diswnce rquhmments at egms location been wo per AASITFO requirenients? ri 4 1, 1 _-_"ter 0 Owsr DIA -11 - - ct P tom- b, rntersection Level cServicQ (LI Amos& [Werseclions lo be evalualed sholl, be delermined /rJ, the 0111" q/7"'(11minds Trqffic, Ellgilleer Exkdng Condit ons I DS Delays r A Year of Opcniiig IDS a YYs FFive-Te'al'i 130yond C11,111ge of LOS Delays [Lia�n�d tIr Y(),, I i c. Dessibe chmumlization warrants: p VA Of cl. Velflele Storage/Queuing, Analysis (calcidate -50% twel 95 % (pejOig lengilis): M h 505% 95% Exisdng Onditions Year of Opening, Five Yens Beyond Cliange of Land the c. If appropriate. MaW huMccontrol warrants (e.g. Stop Sign Warrants, signal warrink): r, slunfnarizc Ideal accident ilistory ", (only roquirod for access to principal and III i novartc�riakq): —,,�OV, van awt 4 Availabtc upon request at City or F,,'dmonds Development Scrvice4 Deparinwill Avidable upon requeM at City of F"(1111cuds llolicl. IMpadment R,,!vis,Woi 6�2-140 1."32 - Tr(fflic hnpawl� bwhwis If"ewksheel /Yqe 3 #5 TRAFFIC VOLUIVIES flovide the 1bHov,,vi1q-,,, and other planned development traffic Within the c-,ity, a. Dewribe exishng Aur mut pnk-hotwummm Qs thmi Iwo years salol), induding uuvhlf-1 mmTmeMv on We! Went to and dirootly impacted by thea proicut. r--,dmm6dS ov, Ab-�= A013DO 100+-1-A,�r,6j ; t, C, PM C,P n -K (AM)r V(5 ID VIAeS - b. Desmibe the eWmalud ADT rind pork -hour counts, hwhdhg mmhW mmwmmm dw year be pntect is fully open (with and mdbom project traffic). AS 4quy ytz 4 TIA C, Dew-ibc tile fl: IS011,11ted ADTand tiding turning movements, five year's after the project has been tally open (with and without prqject trallb), q�4 a10 t xW NPAP-S op -nA kp,,4 -P�, (1, nnu, I background trafflogy,ov,,th racforand,�Ource: —AdDys 0 C&M cps D -J 1 ovt� AvenVvi 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Seryice, Analysis betow mW atumh supporting LOS unatysis doe umentation. 11m ide the CoHavvigg dounammion Rv each artmW street or, I arterial interiection impa0ed by ten or more peak -hour trips, tither City -planned developments must ako be hacmd into the LOS calenhations. LOS LOS Existing (104hions Rising T- Delky.s I Year o r ()pcni ng, Whh 11r(ject VOW PProjecttC fl- l',ivc Years Beyond Change of OF -T With Project Without Vrojcct Land Use ------------- I We any umuntptiondva0alms to standard awjjysisdefatflt vflucs tmdjustifieationa: pclftct Oo-Y)VA .04 AS a ' A list of picioned developments are available at tile City upon rque'st Col. ImIllic R"Rd m Ci .='-1.I 0 fne?1EWiS ffhhWi IATv 4 of �1 4 f04 L& Nat1,117, 7, MltTGA` IONT State recommended we'aasiares and ilius required to ttailifale proJec,t spc6fic traffic in1pacts. "I'rni,fic impact fee Shaul be caalcrilaied flroni die Edmonds Road Impact Fee Study Table 4 (atlaclied) and as identified iar FC DC l 8,81120, except as othc;i'ta iso pr vidul t'or iiatdopca dent fcc calculations in I C DC:' 18U�11 110, Fee for prior use Shall be based oil (cc established rat file iitalc file prior use was pertatit cd, If tftc previous arse was permitted prior it) than adoption of Ordinanc o 3516 (effective date•: 09/12!04)e tlac 2OO4 E('i.)(' 19.82,1" 0 impact fee shall be arse:((. tErarts ire Per 01) it square feet, Fe( I'I'l [„iisril tt4a Category ory Fee ]tate > of dwelling' New (Ise l SSh.l x i fit) s, l 'a°tCtt �lsi O ± 7lfi�rJ Noxa Use lee: S 94 Prior 1.14( lee: S NEW DEVELOPMENT EN (Jnits ira Pei, Unit stlalarc COCt, ITUI Larr(t Use Category Fee Rate R c�#' clay ul Haag, Fee vip, Ctc LN (;N,v IIso j City of Edmouds, ught :criu Division Approval Date ' No impact fccs will t)4 (laic, nor will a c1dit t)U gdvcat, Forur, impet fcc w1culcation a ;suluhag in ra nest R, ,i.w mi &2,11;10 Et'ois Ccr=pm—i ,irtri}Y.vl lVo t diet/ fits,( 5 n1'5