Traffic Impact Analysis.1.29.14.pdfRECEIVED
DEVELMIMEN I SEFINWES
J
ITT
Nauate of Proposed Project:
(Dim,ner/Applicaml
Name
Acidrc'ss
City Stale Zip
17
Tclephone�,.
A Q7
...........
CS o
Applican-t C oniact Person-
Sixee[I 'Mmiling� Addiess
city stats Zip
Ir of is Engineer who prepared tiro 'Iraffic matt ct Analysis (il'applicable):
Firm Name
Telephone:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANAINSIS
Trafflic Level ' s
f. 1--ess than 25 peak -hour trips generated
H. Mere than 25 peak-bour trips generated
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ContacT Name
F'Amjl�
Sections to co
I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checkli-st)
All scetions
-LA 21� M, K >
a i4einify map and site plan.)
ko a ( Z3� -
Spoci.F proposed tyl,-)e and si/,c of dcvelopincill: k- P-,
Qf re.delerllhd affils anflMrsq
gwrefiwtfu, U(1011,
/,,(,I r.Ycd oa "1" "1.to
d. Date consmiction w1lj be -in and bo comp[ete Lf
e, Define proposed mecesi locations: t Vo �I
v e,
f. Define proposed sight distance at site eggress I ocat] ons CL AP_ 4�
2. THIP GENE RATION
Source shall be the Fighth Edition of the Institute cif Transportation Engineers OTE) Trip Generation
inannal. For independent 1ee calculations, the current editjoij cif the ITE manual may be used.
ADT=.Averagc Daily'Fraffic
PM Peak-11OLIF trips (AM, noon or school peak may salsa apply as directed by the City Lngineer)
, a.,
Existing SiteTrip GenerationTable
PIA Peak-HOLW'Frips
N7-
1,Rnd Use Daily (ADT) -T
----------
b. Proposed Projecl Trip GenerationTable:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN
OUT
c. Net New Proj)ec I Trip Generation "fable:
Plv1 Peak-HOUr Trips
I and U Se Daily (ADT) IN OUT
d. Stale assumptions and -methodology for internal,.link-diverted or passby trips;
Rcv,;m!o o?l 6`741,10 h_,72 - Trtjffiii., impact 4wflYsis IVW-4shecl Page of
:3. TRIP WSTRIBUTION
Prepare and. attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments, For
developments that generate over 75 peak-hourtrips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trim distribution to be deiermined through use of the City traffic model,'
4. SITE ACCESS ROA13WA.']r'I.DRil.VEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been n et per AASt fTt3 rec�uirei etttS?
l). Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Ji?tcrsections to heevahwte4l.4hall he determined by the Cite of`F..dmouds° T'raffre En-ineer
c. Describe channetization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 rTt elfin leng'tlis):
50%
95%
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
LOS
Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
Year oJ. Opening
LOS
Delays
Five Years beyond Change of
Delays
Land UseLOS
c. Describe channetization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 rTt elfin leng'tlis):
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrant-, (e.g. step sign warrants, signal warrants).:
f. 5un-1111aJ'ize.local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
.AVa.ilahle ttpon request at City of Edmonds Developm m Seivices Department
AVIila171e L111011 recfue t at City of Edmonds Police Department
I eO.,,'vd oii 6,-24,;'. 110 E82 - Trcifflc 1mjjoc1_=tnahsb: Wor4sheel Piige 3 nl-S
50%
95%
Existing Conditions
Year of Opeilincr
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrant-, (e.g. step sign warrants, signal warrants).:
f. 5un-1111aJ'ize.local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
.AVa.ilahle ttpon request at City of Edmonds Developm m Seivices Department
AVIila171e L111011 recfue t at City of Edmonds Police Department
I eO.,,'vd oii 6,-24,;'. 110 E82 - Trcifflc 1mjjoc1_=tnahsb: Wor4sheel Piige 3 nl-S
5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned dc-v-cloptnenI vfie witI ti the city.'
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hoer Counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
h. Describe the estimated ADT and peak. -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and Without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated .ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning Enovem.cnts, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. Smite annual background traffic growth factor and source:
b. LEVEL OF SERVICE (.LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Surninarize Level of Seii�lce Analysis below and attach s-upporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
b. l ote any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
.A list of planned developments are av,aiihible at, thc. City upon. tequest for public records
PeOsed on 6r24i10 E82 - ' Ifie 1'�rty cx #,utr1�>,rr_c 1J�i�rkslzecr Pe 4 of -5
LOS
LOS
Existing Conditions
Delays
Year ol-Opening
W1 L11 Project
Without Project
Five fears Beyond Chan—ge of
Land Use
With Project
Without Project
b. l ote any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
.A list of planned developments are av,aiihible at, thc. City upon. tequest for public records
PeOsed on 6r24i10 E82 - ' Ifie 1'�rty cx #,utr1�>,rr_c 1J�i�rkslzecr Pe 4 of -5
IV 11 CA TJ 01'1u
St,afe recon-immW mmums and Wes mquired 10 Wipe pject Sped& WDO impaos. 1jamc
Opm! Ile shAl he eMmImed Kni die Fdmmds Road Impact I`ee 1hate Sludy f.,kk., 4 (attachied)
dcp�,,ndent fee calculations
and as Wentified in ECDC 1811120, excepi as otherwisf.' pi%Mded fur iy,i
in FCDC 18M M
(HIANGE IN USE
Fee for JM'i0lLBO Fhall be based crag the esmWed at We JMCOIC PJOY USC WaS, PCI-Mifted, ffthe
jimhus use was pennhved pr' or to the adoption of (Whonce 396 date,: 09/12!0-1),
the 2004 FCDC M 81 IN Wpm (sae WH be md .
I FE Land Usc calegory1Pei Unit 1 Fee Raw
Tqev Ilse SAO, S
pror the
MCA I Ell
SqUM'C',
N of dweHhy,
'aria etr.
X
.......... .
rpc 'I I or I Iso Fee: "I
Ise Fc;:—
p IM DEVE W! NO
U r, ASS ifin,
Pei, Unit square fiect.
ITE Land Use Category Fee
Fee Rale A'dweHing,
evv Use X,
........ . ... ...........
Clq uf Edmumb,
E CALA:VLATION: $201100 (f conSURMA The
AL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 1 $
Approval
UUMMO
Nio impac'l toes vvifl he d". mv "If as crelt be gkm Q an Qmct I'm cal(.:Iflafion rvsuhiny; in a Hcr negaflvt'�.
n ? r;.:_"",. 0 '""'? - Tkqjfic fmpo' / Anulpis H`In-"'Yheel Page 5 €y4;