Loading...
Traffic Impact Analysis.pdfName of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Applicant Contact Pet -son: V_AQ'V—e. Name Name Tb lapcjo. oe e Street/Mailing Address Street/Mailing Address V4Ar t m 6'rA es City State Zip City ...... . ... Telephone: Telephone: Zotp Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): WE3; f,t k X_ (..A ?"rAl Firm Name Contact Name I Telephone: Uo"-" 9,37 1 `7 ak�') Z,- State Zip E-mail:I'k, rl'ar4c'.. us Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete ",",,,,,, Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) 11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: el.) VIA c:�a 1,4 G.1 Ok L",1 CA �J (Attach a vicinity inap and site plait.) b. Specify existing land use: 544G%%aE L-7' c. Specify proposed type and size of development: �,jfwq e" J "t M 6±,,LAU"� (# of residential units andlor square,footage of building) IX , 'Gene", J k o Revised on 0124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page I qJ'5 � d Date construction will begin and be : "F�nA70v n. Define proposed access locations: [ "ID~� 2. TRIPGENERATION . ` Source shall hxthe Eighth Edition ofthe Institute of Transportation Engineers (7[E)Trip Generation manual. For independent (ec calculations, the current edition ofdho ITE n1anuaJ may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic / / ^^. ^~.~ .~.^ trips (A. .~~.^~^ .~^~~.'~.~.^./ .^...''.y .~....`~. ' _ Existing Site Trip Generation ---_ ,,PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) I i I // IN 'OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (AD'T) OUT c. Net New Project Trip Table: PM Peak -Hour d. State assumpti s and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: mm Revised ono1)*Do Exz n,0icImpact Analysis Worksheet Page 2qJ'5 3. TMP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peals -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AA HTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the CIYOfEdinonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions I LOS I I Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use C. (Attach siriping pl cn.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis Calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): Existing Conditions e. If appropriate, state t 50% of 95% control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize loci accident history (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon req est at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon re nest at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Traffic ImpactAnalysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years okd), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peals -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is frilly open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour cou ts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and ithout project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth/ actor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) AN 'SIS a. Summarize Level of Service An lysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following docume tation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. then City -planned developments I must also be factored into the LOS calculations. b. Note any as s/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: ' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised oa 0124/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. L?` CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, vfn, etc. New Use 2 1' f "f f �t���� $ ..� ���rG' X 10 L"r.f"t, _ Prior Use Fee New Use Fee: $") �) ) 6 Prior Use Fee: $ I" �m — $ 43 mm U NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in. ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, of , etc. New Use $ X ENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ consultant fee TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT lF EI $ City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date Fee ' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6/24110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of '5 211 F din -vdvrs Po I L,f,,i,,rv:Nog Nori!*, ea V'Oil n"n e'll vor a'? XA .11 I C-3 re w I o%v A Q,A . . . . ...... Unit Size Garage Number of Number of Unit (sf) Size (0) Bedrooms Parking Spaces 101 979 330 1 1 102 1,433 388 32 103 1,433 388 3 2 104. 1,079 388 2 2 105 1,719 458 3 2 106 1,719 458 3 2 107 1,719 4583 2 108 1,719 458 3 2 109 1,716 590 2 2 110 1,750 408 2 2 Total 15,266 4,324 25 19 Chapter 1340 Driveway, Use the design template that will best accommodate the intended use of the driveway, unless a smaller driveway is appropriate and will not adversely affect the traveled way of the state highway. If necessary, use turn simulation software (such as AutoTURW) to verify the driveway design will adequately accommodate the largest vehicle that will regularly use the driveway. If a driveway connection has (or will have) adjacent sidewalk, use the applicable Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance Standard Plan F-80.10 and width issued on the access permit. The design and construction of any sidewalk shall be compliant with Chapter 1510 and Section F of the Slawlard Plans, in addition to the latest Americans with Disabilities Act criteria. 1 N, )I r,i�,'; �r� � ��� ,i'.• ir`� �` ��, u,(,,� _.. ,, ( i )h� �., -M�I� � 1. ii A driver on the highway needs to see far enough ahead to assess developing situations and take actions appropriate for the conditions, such as when a vehicle is either entering or leaving the highway at a driveway. In addition, drivers entering the highway from a driveway also need to see enough of the highway, whether to the left or right, so they can take actions appropriate for the conditions to enter the highway in a reasonably safe manner. Design and locate driveways such that the sight distances meet or exceed the distances shown in Exhibit 1340-3; these distances may require an approaching vehicle to reduce speed or stop to prevent a collision. In addition, provide decision sight distance for through traffic at all utility and special -use driveways on facilities with limited access control (see Chapter 1260). For road approaches with AWDVTE greater than 1,500, use intersection sight distance criteria (see Chapter 1310). Areas along driveway legs and across their included corners should be clear of obstructions that might block or affect a driver's view of potentially conflicting vehicles. [1] Measured from the edge of through lane. If the desirable 18 -foot setback cannot be achieved, obtain as much as practicable, down to a 1.0 -foot minimum. [2] Not required for driveways restricted to right in/right out. Driveway Sight Distance Exhibit 1340-3 WSL° OT Design Manual M 22-01.10 Page 1340-5 July 2013 I d �fi a a mob$ 0agaaa§a�smasag�3 b= a � a s�� Nag 2aha N Ug a'"g g uuuuuuuuuuuu � Y� 3Y�� �bb�8'�tlB�YJU s���`w�`LS�k LLCt®firdy SLggi _� . q y K /�/ / J' €a BVI ggg 33gg Y ke€'""$'tea_ $ $ m$ bbpa a 2 nye Gig �b A�5 �m y ffjj y5y�**pp s u e ¢ x u a §s aqc ae�fi� �Gba� OWN � sgm `d &UP � E a ga$�'R5R s a 52, QX �p a m a s mm F a sms 9 a& s 21 y s � Sg �& $^ H -v t m m8g s 3: �8�b �3�8 �=r���S i.'t��€S .. °'£�3' Yi�ai�k' _ �a=^•F;t�dtl -� � µ .X' .n GSa� w ,- waw m _ :� `d &UP � E a ga$�'R5R 0 J Q >< m 2 In IR � I �