The URL can be used to link to this page

18610 OLYMPIC VIEW DRiiiiiiii iiiiii 14329 18610 OLYMPIC VIEW DR Dennis M. Bruce, RE. m.&C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Enginoer May 16, 2002 City of Edmonds c/o Eagiewood Homes, Inc. DEVELOPMENT SEHVICES CTR. 18607 Olympic View Dr, OTY OF EDMONDS Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Fin is technical Inspections ggl gp .Ag AMR i I -Family Residence UNIA110111 11 16 New Single Permit No. 200712 This engineering report summarized special geotechnical inspections for the new single-family residence constructed at 18610 Olympic View Dr., Edmonds, Washington. REFUENCEI: • city of Edmonds approved Project Plans P.E., dated August 7, 2000 • Geotechnical Evaluation Report by D. Bruce, • Numerous construction inspection photographs • On -site Inspection Card with geotechnical verifications I N s P5qL1 0- _NS: This enginear haa provided on -site geotechnical inspections for the Eaglewood Homes new residence at 18610 Olympic View Dr. 1) Exca Cations: Excavations began in September 2000. Sub -grade so;ls were as anticipated by the Geotechnical Report. Slope is stable and excavations are stable. igineer verified the proper placement of formwork, re- 2) F _ndon ht s ei minimum s Ou I ai c s* T i -grade verification of 2,000 P,S.f. tee and oncre e as well as sub bearing capacity (see On -site Inspection Card dated October 2000). 3) Ero§i piq_Cp . ntrql: Contractor properly installed siltation fencing, straw bales and rock construction entrance in accordance with approved erosion control plans, Contractor successfully maintai . nod erosion control measures throughout project. SITE DEvELOPMENr - I . NSPECTION , DRAINAGE - DESIaN & PERM17' - LEGAL SOILS FOUNDATIONS (206) $46-9217 - FAX 546-8442 p.0. Box 55502 0 Shoreline, Washington 98155 - zo'�l S�WOH aOOW3100� WtJ.0T:TT 2:00Z-Tz-,_)n1d City of Edmonds July 28, 2002 Page 2 4) Site , : Given the presence of a sloped property, grading was an essential element of this project (see photographs). Contractor successfully "benched" zones for the new house construction. Additionally, overall grading was successfully done in incorporating landscape rockeries. 5) Rockeries: This engineer provided on -site inspections for the rear (westerly) landscape rockeries as well as the driveway entrance (southeasterly) rockeries, Base rock were properly embeddedin. the dense,, native, sub -grade soils. Rock courses Were properly linke . d, chinked, and battered. All rockeries were prope-rly installed in accordance with ARC Standards, normal standard practices, and this engineer's on -site inspections. Rockeries, are geotechnlcally approved. 6) pEatgo-. The new residence complies with City of Edmonds drainage requirements regarding downspouts and connection to storm system. Additionally, a."french drain" was installed within the south property line (see photographs). This engineer verifi the proper installation of the south' prope�y line french drain. 7) Slab Sub- rade: This engineer verified the presence of dense, native, sub - minimum of 2,000 p.s.f. for the concrete slab sub - grade soils providing a grade. Additionally, contractor complied with approved Project Plans regarding installation, rebar and visquene placement. SUMMARY: spection aspects for the residence at 18610 Olympic All special geotechnical in d. View Dr. haVe-been properly completed and are If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call DMB:abj REcF-IVED AUG 2 7- 2002* DavELoPMENT SERVICES CTR '. 0TY OF EDMMS �00 7 Dennls M. Bruce, E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer SBWOH a00MA_19tZJA WO T T : T T ZOOZ- T z-onti Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. August 7, 2000 City of Edmonds Building Department c/o Eaglewood Homes 18607 Olympic View Drive 14 A %A1 ki + n QQnon Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer RECE.IVED Ai C 4 L'S 0 n 2CSOL E__ 111U" 0, CLO "V V DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation - Foundation Recommendations Proposed New Doty Residence 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington This engineering report presents the results, of a geotechnical evaluation of the Doty property at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / contractor concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Location map • Site plan (by Ronald Johnson, architect) • House plans by Ronald Johnson, architect • Site photographs BACKGROUND: The lot at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds has never been developed. The lot is rectangular, with approximately ninety foot (90') of frontage along Olympic View Drive. The lot runs approximately one hundred sixty feet (160') down slope (westerly). The lot contains numerous mature fir trees and moderately dense shrubbery. The lot contains sloped portions varying from fifteen percent (15%) to approximately forty-five percent (45%). Visual evaluation of the lot revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No settlements, no slides, no shifting, no soil creep, nor any erosional degradation were observed. It is understood that property owners (Doty) intend to construct a single family residence in the footprint location as shown on Ronald Johnson architect plans dated July 31, 2000. It is further understood that Eaglewood Homes (Mr. Craig Reimer) will be the general contractor for this project. SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 ' Eaglewood Homes Pagetwo Adjacent properties in the immediate vicinity of this lot, as well as the general neighborhood, consist of single family residences on slopes similar to this property. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug under this engineer's observation on August 4, 2000 using a rubber -tired backhoe (see photographs). A total of three soil test pits were dug (see site plan for locations). Test Pit No. 1 was dug in the central driveway / parking area for the proposed residence. Test Pit No. 2 was dug in the north central location of the proposed residence, and Test Pit No. 3 was dug along the westerly foundation line of the proposed Doty residence. All test pits revealed similar subgrade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Organics, forest duff. 6" to 3' Sandy silt with occasional gravels. Moderately dense. 3' to 9' Dense to very dense sand with lenses.of silty sand No water was encountered in any of the three test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: . Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Doty property at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, is geotechnically approved for the proposed new single family residence, subject to the following: • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. Eaglewood Ho,mes Page three The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled Gen6ral Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square,foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Desion Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. Eaglewood Homes Page four SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as,6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Desicin Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above Eaglewood Homes Page five lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical.. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an Eaglewood Homes Page six appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the three test pits during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or Eaglewood Homes Page seven near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1 557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper Eaglewood Homes Page eight organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the lot at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington. Surface water is generally absorbed in the sandy subgrade soils. Overland runoff would flow generally westerly down the existing slope. City of Edmonds Olympic View Drive roadway contains an existing storm water system consisting of roadside ditches. Compliance with City of Edmonds standard storm water detention methods in are geotechnically acceptable. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. INSPECTION: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction,: • Soil cuts • Foundation subgrade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The proposed new Doty single family residence at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspection during construction. Eaglewood Homes Page nine STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the new Doty single family residence at 18610 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington (as prepared by Ron Johnson, architect, dated July 31, 2000), have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommenclationa are, satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to -the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. JEXF4RES 12./23/-d-M F91M.'M DC)O Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer -207 PERMIT NO: C of Edmo' nds ity PERMIT EXPI S SIDE SEWER PERMIT 4C. IS9 r, Address of Construction: 11M Ouw�i Wbi; Property Tax � Account Parcel No EDMONDS ,TREATMENT.PL) Attach copies of all access and utility easements Wrified and Approved b Owner and/or Contractor: �_.ftk "m AOV& 10L Contractor License'#: tm, Building Permit #1001111 N'Single Family Invasion into City *Ri ght-of Wa N Y. 0'i�es' 0 F-1 Multi -Family (No. of Units *RW Construction Permit # Ej Commercial (No.* of Units Cross,other "Private Property:'- Ej Yes No H Public "Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. Own' er Jorzc6ntrfftc(r signature and acknowledgement statement: By sig g for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled Side Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein Dafe W CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-425-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION W R FOR INSPECTION CALL 42.5-771-0220 -extension 329 W., 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A- $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL. BE CHARGED. Job- Site Ready YES NO, Date: Initial: Partial InspecUon: Partial Inspection: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: -4 9 9 --,0 Initial: P_ 'S' Ditell-ZI-00 Initial: S�w Date: Initial: ilt to Streetfile: t'� PERMIT MUST'BE POSTEDON JOB SITE t� White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bld&,forms'sspermitjlg4/00 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing t EASEMENT NO . ........................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . ... ......... OWNER ........................ .... .............. .......................... ............ ...... ...... ... CONTRACTOR *W5 ZO JOB ADDRESS ....... Rk.!�D .... ov.D� ........... ......................... ...... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ........... ................ PERMIT NO. -.— ............. ... BLOCK NO . .................... ....... <— N Is" .................... ..................................... ........... ......................................................... 11 ........ ...... ................ ZAMEOF ADDITION ............................................................................................. ......................... I & 11D (3 \1 �) 41% qo qo c lxaf il % le � :SbJK� Q Approved: Q7— G PWW-0001 -11/75 (REV. 11178) DATE............................................ By ............................................................ Water S(Irvice Drawing EASEMENT'NO . ............................................ The City of Edmonds L110 NO . .................. . ASMT- NO . .................. NEW CONSI�RUCrION Cl IkEPAIRS OWNER....................... ......... -1-4 C JOB ADDRESS AS-G--�-Q ....... w ................................ t ...................... I ............... .cONTRACTOK ........... Y,,EGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT.NO . .. ........................ *-'** ...... * BLOCK NO . ..................... .................................................................. . ........................................... ................. ....................................................... .............. Approved: PA Rripit- 1%12.2-100 DATL.... .............. By -Tll�--: ......................................... j-wVjw.o0ul-1 1175 (REV. 11178) 18607 Olympic View Dr. Eagkowood Homs, I= Edmonds. WA WM0 (425) 771-6822 (426) 7754M fox May 15,2000 Maryanne Zukowski Traffic Engineer City of Edmonds Re: Proposed Residence at 1861 x Olympic View Dr. Dear Maryanne: RzCzW'Vzn 200 DEVELOPMEN! SERVICES CT[j. CITY OF EDMONDS I spoke with Gordy Hyde concerning proposed access to the attached lot from. OlympicViewDr.. He had, recommended that I do aline of sight study for the site, and submit my proposal to you. Attached are the results of a traffic study I performed. At a point 10' back from the curb and 3'6" high, I could see a 6" object in the center of Olympic View Dr. 190' away to the north, and 345'to the south (see attached site/vicinity map). I understand that the city minimum sight requirements are that a 6" object must be able to be seen at least 125' away. As you can see, this requirement is more than satisfied. I am requesting access off of Olympic View Dr. for the proposed residence to be constructed on this site. If you need any further information, or would like to meet with me on site, please page me at (206) 907-8969. Sincerely, 9 c g mer r 9 . President cc: Gordy Hyde !�;"r. F1 1-�F- 0�4 C005 001 01'� r-v4 Ve5 C=s rw J 011uck rl fit rot\— ko, I N4 C-4 Vvmow) RD. 4 oO It &4�1 I) Now 's fag 9 3 qe. 4.4 on Crc t� i;j 1 135 a W, -Y. PLANNING DATA NAME: BoZ, h.KARIFN L)C)7y 16(010 O'LYMPIC V10AI SITE ADDRESS: IDR- -DATE: 9--3-00. ZONING: Rco-)E PLAN CHK#: 00 - SS2, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW SER, CORNER LOT-_�10—,(Yes/No) FLAG LOT 14D - —(Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: I Front: 2,1;' Left Side: 10 Right Side: 101 Rear: 2-S' Actual Setbacks: Front: 2-6 Left Side: Id Right Side: 166 Rear: G41 Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: Actual: 0 t3 12- BUILDING HEIGHT: I I Maximum Allowed: 2,15 Actual Heiaht: 9-4,15 115 __ . jj(p,43 AG Daturn Point: Datum Elevation: 141 A.D.U. CREATED?: SUBDIVISION: so r72- CRITICAL AREAS C) o - 0 t SEPA DETERMINATION: VAW LOTAREA: ILM&SO �ba, FT; OTHER: Plan Review By: av� c:Ti1cs\permit\^p1andaLdoc PLAT oP-siip vcy FOR RON WAILES, JR Lot 4 and that Portion of Lot 13, block "C". Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according t 9 the Plat theiii�f rccarded In Voluft 3 of Plats. page 76, records of Snobhomish County, Washington, lying west Of Olympic View Drive; EXCEPT the southerly 10 feet Of*tl',at' Portion of Lot I],IyInq northvm5terly of Olympic View Drive and the southerly 10 feat of Lot 4, all In 51114 9lock 14CIG. *0 sa f04 kf 17.*f7 10q rz> DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR- CITY OF EDMONDS W1 ARA' sr Thli. 1% a resuryov or q I coriainted P-ovamber 20, 1967 under UA ich !!o . 3109 Kv'�- Wx,('V?-W , 'a- RC&4 ENGINEERS . SURVEYORS - PLANNERS o97 CH. 1W EdMCAdi.W*.W.fjf6%90020 sp w Mil fP I houll. AN g3 0 rl� E�6L�-NAM fttk�JNL. Gm\w> /-%tt AN \P, myv\A OV4 Ir 0 OUS-o- 00 - r)%IIA .0 e 1p �VW'\\Akt, '��t> 91MA Vf\ Pofm �Dvl\ i�', t �Np _ \,tor, kf kN�. pr-u\:: It,- I�k ck�k OmIr 4VN6 kto\ o C W-9p C4 vw �o MONO e\h"f, i-lo cv%, 155, � le �M 1XI MAY-22-2000 08:50 CITY OF EDMONDS 425'?710221 P.01/01 RECRIVED MAY 19 M%MTWM=5 Karim KwAmoto Planner City of Edmonds lowcof VkWor. Ed a d WAG= (4M 7714M (CM TIMM fu May 19, 2000 Re: 1861x Soundview Pl.. Property Tax Aoct. numbers 4646 003 004 0005 & 43460030130103 Dear Knissm- Per our conversations regading the above referenced site, it Is my understanding #iat the site is exempt ftm requIrIng a permIt for tree'removal and that I am permitted to remove -any tress at any fime. If you ooncur wIM my unders ing, plimse sign this memo below. Sincerely, Cra' Re mar P idervt Karisw.7?f =Nmhoito Planner City of Edmonds I MTAL P. 01 CA FILE IV Zom— (a I - L) - 0 Z- CA FILE IV Critical Areas Checklist ------------------------------ . - -! .. ... -------- -------- -------------- Site Information (soil s/topography/hydrology/veigletat�io I Site Address/Location: �0� VAtl i 2. Property Tax Account Number: �;% W�,, MR 000S 'Ai� 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Js this site currently developed? _yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply., Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). X' Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of I 0-feet over.a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6.. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: (\O Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: (\0 Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? NN 8. Site is in the floodway K) floodplain (\U of a water course.' 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the . grounds surface? Flows pre year- round? M Flows are seasonal? AD (What . time of year? 0 /A 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obviou's wetland is present on site: 00 ........... .......... ...... . ... ......... - . . . ....... ------ F orCity.StaffUse: Only -7 .. . ... 7. I site is Zone DE.MMINATION Am_chk.doc; Rev 10/03197 IfED D ..PERMIT EkPIRES CL CITY OF EDMONDS USEr PERMIT ZON NUMBER S JOB UITIADt_ ADDRESS /64M U", CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION . OWNERNA E/NAMEOF BUSINESS U 1�- U — PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOTAt. r LID NO. LID FEE U 1= zo — MAILIN kw-) OvA V� ftz I vkzw PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION I- FT TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street Us, Perinit Req'd Required Sidewalk Required ijo '0 Underground ....... g require d'qE3 �4 CITY ZIP 0M LEPHRNE METT SIZE All LINE SIZE it NO. b �FI.X�URES j PRV REQUIRED _7= YES NO 0 cc NAMIf ljo z REMARKS z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE. ADDRESS Ir q ZIP gill TELEPHONE 7- z 0 0 NAME bktwaA ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE ku ADDRE& 0\"At\1\'kL V\N FIRE REVIEWEDBY DATE UJI LL CTY ZIP JELEPFJONE VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTI00i, REO'D [3 YE L.IL BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE C ECKED BY V) 12 SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED _j 4 LOU _j PERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL PPO NO. Ajke4(,(a !3.4 +3* 00?� OA- (M NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH c3 COMPLIANCE OR AUDITION COK4MERCIAL CHANGE OF USE f REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN GFIADING FENCE REPAIR !ftl CYDS ( X FT) LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR o' PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT LIR SIDE REAR 25 101/11) 64 z z PARKIN G REQ'D F ROVIDED �141 LOT AREA .0 P �UIEW DATE REMARKS DEMOLISH C] TANK OTHER z Lu a o GARAGE, JX RETAINING WALL RENEWAL. CARPOR ROCKrRy '(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS �NACTIVITY) RXPLAIN: I I CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSJRUCTION C DE OCCUPANT 1 -1 GROUP NUMBEA j OF STOR IES &512�AWt] NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS_ CRITICAL Zj= AREAS NUMBER -Z= — (at SPECIAL INSP�CTQPI REQUIRE Y S NT DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D a ktM > f L VALUATION I . FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % SLOPE % T-IJ910 BUIL DING: INS ; PL CK NIC VESTED DAfE PLUMBIN G MECHANICAL 9110 THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC t BE DONE DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. r Q % 'i=��TRGE PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS CL PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES 50 SEE 8_A;K OF PINK PFRMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION C E S 0 R S APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS�'ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE C I T Y 0 F W2 ;N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF q0 A N Y A N D EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTSFROM ANY AND TL Y cc ECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIR 3' C RECEIPT L NOT BE FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. 'ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DI NANCE DEEMED To MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE lAdGENF VI SION - 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE REfUj RMATION i'HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT., AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF ST :)N RUC_ THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the MPLOYED TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and ATING To IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WOR)fO�N'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OF C N AT (OW R A�EN DAT� SIGNED (425)S�INARE 771-0220 1 LEASED BY /IDAT ATTEfiTION EXT 333 7. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 4 -T A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 City of Edmonds Permit No%__'�QW�1=?_ RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date.9).S' 312-.- A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: I:b& 49LIq VA r-11 C, V I elli 1�pl� B. Type of Work (be specific): Wwg 1 4r� 4 49W 0-rt'vTf IKA /V1 (PAO*V07 C. Contractor: Contact: Ph one: Mailing Address: S ate License #: Liability Insurance: Bond:$ t D. Building Permit # (if applicable): or-41 ZI Side Sewer Permit # (if -applicable): E. Commercial Subdivis' F ion City Project 0 EUC (PLJD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) Multi -Family Single Family Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: YES f-I NO G. SIZE OF CUT x H. 'Chkrge.-,"$ A CONCRETE CUT: E] YES NO IDEMNITY. Applicani,understands by his/her signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds har,,Tlessfrom-Injuries, damages or claims of any.kind or description whatsoev6r, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the. City of-Edmohds or any of its departments or employees, inc . luding but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR,-VORKMANSHIP AND MATERJALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE"WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED B Y CITY FORCES, A T WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger.must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the requir�d training in their possession. Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with'asphalt or City- approvedmaterial p / ridr to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. IRAVE READ THEABOVE STATEMENTSAND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THATIMUSTMAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMITAVAILABLE ONSITEATALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signaiur., Date:41 /00 (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424,-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY "I 1� Approved by: Right-of-way Fee, 0 Time Authorized: Void After 5V] X; ftoisruption Fee/Fund 111: Special Conditions: Restoration Fee: I �ArAi I--, W4�L- A-,-Ae'0 A:5-0 kAAA 11!�2 Total Fee-VM2- 10_—W:;eP005 Receipt No e2S-=� LL-4 L��J Issued by: UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK9 AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE I FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. INSPECY6dS SIGNATURE DATE: For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. I NO WORK SI-IAIA, BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE I m I klP V� Ink Po AP -9-00- il�''P'PrMVED As POOTED "Oik -ROW ac, Lot NOW— IM, _!a._�Osz ft. \ 7 VL \Nl\ Ile 4.-