The URL can be used to link to this page

2014.03.25 CC Agenda Packet AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 25, 2014 6:30 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1. (30 Minutes) Convene in executive session to discuss property acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b). REGULAR MEETING MARCH 25, 2014 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2.(5 Minutes)Roll Call 3.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda 4.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items A.AM-6705 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 4, 2014. B.AM-6701 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 18, 2014. C.AM-6707 Approval of claim checks #207610 through #207759 dated March 20, 2014 for $450,648.68. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #60860 through #60875 for $454,471.94, benefit checks #60876 through #60882 and wire payments of $201,383.27 for the period March 1, 2014 through March 15, 2014. D.AM-6700 Approval to Surplus City Computer Equipment 5.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings 6.(20 Minutes)2013 Annual Report - Snohomish County Fire District 1 Packet Page 1 of 182 6.(20 Minutes) AM-6706 2013 Annual Report - Snohomish County Fire District 1 7.(60 Minutes) AM-6712 Public Comment and Continued Discussion on the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project. 8.(15 Minutes) AM-6714 Yost Pool Operations 9.(25 Minutes) AM-6709 March 2014 Budget Amendment Ordinance 10.(10 Minutes) AM-6680 Traffic Impact Fee Annual Report 11.(15 Minutes)Report on Outside Board and Committee Meetings 12.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments 13.(15 Minutes)Council Comments 14.Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). 15.Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session. ADJOURN Packet Page 2 of 182 AM-6705 4. A. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted By:Linda Hynd Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 4, 2014. Recommendation Review and approval of Exhibit B: 3-4-2014 Draft City Council Minutes that includes sections prepared as a verbatim transcript. Previous Council Action At the March 18, 2014 City Council Meeting, the 3-4-2014 Draft City Council Minutes were pulled from the Consent Agenda and the City Council took the following action: ITEM A: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 2014 Councilmember Bloom advised the council members that she has requested a verbatim transcript of the portion of Item 7 where she asked Mr. Williams questions about the PSRC application. The verbatim has been provided; she wanted an opportunity to review it. She suggested the verbatim be incorporated in the minutes and brought back to the Council on 3/25/2014 as a draft. Councilmember Bloom moved, seconded by Councilmember Petso, to move Item A, Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes, of March 4, 2014 to next week. Councilmember Bloom advised that she requested the verbatim because she felt the written summary did not reflect what happened. She asked the questions so that they would be in the public record and it was important it be in the public record exactly accurate. Narrative The following documents are attached: Exhibit A: 03-04-2014 Draft City Council Minutes as prepared for the March 18, 2014 City Council Meeting. Exhibit B: 03-04-2014 Draft City Council Minutes including sections prepared as a verbatim transcript. The verbatim transcript is highlighted in italics and can be found on pages 5, 6, 7 and 8. Packet Page 3 of 182 Attachments Exhibit A: 3-4-14 City Council Meeting Minutes Exhibit B: 3-4-14 City Council Meeting Minutes Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Dave Earling 03/20/2014 08:41 PM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 08:30 AM Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 03/19/2014 03:25 PM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 4 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 4, 2014 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Diane Buckshnis, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Strom Peterson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Doug Fair, Municipal Court Judge Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE QUALIFICATIONS OF A CANDIDATE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) AND TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session to discuss the qualifications of a candidate for public employment per RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) and to discuss potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 60 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. Action may occur in open session as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Petso and Bloom. Councilmember Petso left the executive session at 6:50 p.m. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Senior Planner Kernen Lien and City Clerk Scott Passey. At 7:07 p.m. Mayor Earling announced to the public present in the Council Chambers that an additional 10 minutes would be required in executive session. The executive session concluded at 7:11 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:14 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Peterson. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD PUBLIC COMMENT TO AGENDA ITEM 7. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 5 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 2 COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 2014 B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #207238 THROUGH #207321 DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2014 FOR $326,674.58. APPROVAL OF REISSUED CHECK #207322 DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2014 FOR $75.00 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, requested the City enforce the 20 mph speed limit on Sunset Avenue and suggested the use of radar signage or police emphasis. He noted the 20 mph speed limit was only enforced in school zones. 6. 2013 MUNICIPAL COURT REPORT Municipal Court Judge Doug Fair thanked Court Administrator Joan Ferebee, Assistance Police Chief Jim Lawless and Probation Officer Sherrie Leyda for their assistance with compiling the information for the report. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of filings 2006 to 2013, explaining filing increased in 2013 to 7,809, returning to historic levels. Filing during the past 5 years have been 7,700 to 7,900 filings. Filings in 2012 were down to 6,325 due to patrol officers who were off duty for a portion of the year as a result of injuries. He explained courts are primarily reactive in nature; workloads are driven by court filings and impacted by the Legislature, Council decisions and Police Department staffing. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of case filings by year 2008-2013, highlighting traffic infractions, other infractions, parking, DUI, criminal traffic and criminal non-traffic. When the police officers in traffic returned to duty, traffic, parking and criminal traffic infractions returned to normal levels. He expected to see a drop in overall criminal findings in 2013 due to the legalization of marijuana. In 2012 there were 75 marijuana and related paraphernalia cases. The voters’ approval of an initiative to provide easier access to alcohol also made access easier for criminals. Although there was a reduction in marijuana cases, there was an increase in Theft 3 due to increased accessibility to alcohol. There were 39 marijuana cases in 2012 and 3 in 2013; paraphernalia cases decreased from 71 to 45 (primarily for harder drugs). Thefts increased from 144 to 201, an increase of 57 or 40%. He pointed out this illustrated how a change in law affected the court and an unintended consequence of making liquor more accessible. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of year-to-year revenues, explaining gross revenues increased from $1.18 million in 2012 to $1.26 million in 2013. Net revenue, after reimbursements to the State, was $812,274. Revenue projections for 2013 were very conservative; actual was approximately 18% over projected revenues. Revenues exceeded expenses by approximately $81,000. Judge Fair Judge Fair displayed an Expenditure Status Report, explaining net expenses were $1,386 over original budget estimates. He anticipated 2014 expenses may be higher due to unexpected expenditures. He reminded courts are not generally an overall revenue generator because the court’s budget does not Packet Page 6 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 3 include the public defender, prosecutor, jail expenses, etc. which included in the executive’s budget. He summarized public safety is an expensive, worthwhile endeavor. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of passport revenue explaining 467 passports were processed in 2013, a slight decrease but generated $11,000 in revenue. Over the past 5 years, passport applications have averaged 500/year. Judge Fair explained the court continues to save the City a substantial amount by using alternatives to confinement such as electronic home monitoring (EHM), alcohol monitoring bracelets, work release and community service. These alternatives saved the City approximately $172,000 in 2013. He noted many of the offenders in Edmonds Municipal Court are low level, low risk, first time offenders. Providing them an opportunity for community service, work release or EHM is better putting them in jail. Statistics show putting low level, low risk offenders with high risk, high level offenders results in more high risk, high level offenders. Judge Fair reported the video in-custody calendar continues to work well; instead of bringing prisoners to the court for in-custody hearings, it is done by video. Defendants remain at the jail with their attorneys and he and the prosecutor are in the court. This is improves safety and saved the City approximately $28,000 the first year, a total of $100,000 since the program began. The video in-custody calendar also allows the court to see approximately twice the number of defendants. Judge Fair thanked the Council for restoring his half-time clerk. He relayed the court’s plans to continue exploring the possibility of online payments. He reported on plans for an electronic filing system, whereby documents could be scanned into an electronic file, eliminating the need for paper files and making documents electronically retrievable. It was hoped this could be combined as part of the City Clerk’s laser fiche system but that system did not provide the features the court needed. Approximately $50,000 in State funds been compiled in the Court Improvement Fund that will be used to implement an electronic filing system. Judge Fair announced the City’s Probation Officer Sherrie Leyda plans to leave the City after 23 years. He thanked her for her service and wished her the best as she relocates to the east coast. Judge Fair relayed there will be increases in the public defender costs as well as jail costs. The jail is considering a tiered system; a basic rate for an average system, a higher rate for prisoners requiring medical and a higher rate for prisoners requiring mental health services. Judge Fair announced he plans to run for Snohomish County District Court South Division Position 3; Judge Carol McRae is not filing for reelection. If he is successful, he will remain as Edmonds Municipal Court Judge through the end of 2014. He relayed a list of his endorsements. He thanked Councilmembers for their support of his plans and for the support they have given him in the past. He said it has been a privilege and a pleasure to serve as Edmonds Municipal Court Judge for the past eight years. Council President Buckshnis thanked Judge Fair for his thorough presentation. She commented on seeing Judge Fair in action when she served on jury duty. Mayor Earling reported the salary Edmonds pays its Municipal Court Judge is substantially less than surrounding courts. The Citizens Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials will begin meeting next week. He anticipated in the near future he will present a budget amendment to increase the Municipal Court Judge’s salary. 7. DISCUSSION, POTENTIAL ACTION AND PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING MODIFYING OR TERMINATING SUNSET WALKWAY Packet Page 7 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 4 Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the reasons for this project include view access, improved safety and providing accessibility. He displayed several photographs of the view from the west edge of Sunset Avenue, of people walking in the street and a bicycle riding the wrong way on Sunset Avenue to illustrate safety issues, and of the dirt path on the west side of the curb to illustrate accessibility issues. Mr. Williams described what is included in the project: • 2,000 foot long multi-use pathway on Sunset o For use primarily by pedestrians but also including wheelchairs, stroller, roller blades, bicycles, Segways, walkers and other non-motorized traffic to connect waterfront walkways to 3rd Avenue • 500 feet of improvements will be constructed on Caspers • 100% ADA accessible • Benches, art work • Continued access to almost all parking on Sunset Mr. Williams described what is NOT included in the project: • Trees • Tall or unshielded lights • Fencing – some limited railing (150 +/- feet) may be necessary Mr. Williams described the public process/information to date: • Project placed on City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2011 – public comment taken, also placed on 2012 and 2013 CIP • Added to Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) in 2011 after public comment and Council approval • Council resolution adopted to apply for funding – 2011 • Public survey and public meeting – 2011 • “Sunset Avenue Overlook” project has been in Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan since 2008 and was just recently placed in the PROS 2014 Plan • Press release issued when initial $159,000 grant received Mr. Williams identified discussion points: • Parking – current proposal retains 43 of 55 existing spaces. Additional design work could increase that to 51 • Circulation – current circulation patterns are retained (one way northbound north of Edmonds) • Driveway access and turning radii are protected or improved • Emergency vehicles, refuse trucks, and other delivery vehicles will be accommodated better than today. Total of 18 feet of pavement: o 10-foot walkway o 2-foot mountable curb o 6 foot clear zone o 12-foot sharrow (travel lane for vehicles and bicycles) • Caspers Street goes to a “shared street” concept • Specific design features ie: artwork benches railing crosswalks, etc. • BNSF coordination o Need higher level design before entering into meaningful discussion • Seismic hazard o Much of SODO area in Seattle built in similar seismic hazard areas Packet Page 8 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 5 Councilmember Petso asked how much roadway width was needed for a travel lane. Mr. Williams responded it depends on speeds. In this case a 1-way 12-foot travel lane is proposed which would accommodate higher speeds. The speeds on Sunset are very low; as the roadway will be used as a sharrow, it makes sense to have 12 feet. He noted the lanes on Main Street where there is considerably more traffic are 11 feet wide. Councilmember Petso asked whether a sharrow improves safety compared to the current travel lane and bike lane. Mr. Williams answered a definitive statement could not be made one way or the other; the safety on Sunset is currently enhanced by the 20 mph speed limit; bicycles function well in both configurations. Councilmember Petso referred to the additional five feet on the west to avoid the need for a fence. She asked if the five feet is needed for a sidewalk or only a multi-use path. Mr. Williams answered wherever there is a change in terrain where people are encouraged to walk where they could fall, good engineering practices would suggest a flat area next to the identified walkway. Councilmember Petso asked whether the extra 5 feet would be necessary for a 4-foot sidewalk. Mr. Williams answered yes. Councilmember Bloom referred to the application submitted to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) in August 2013 to qualify for the federal Transportation Alternatives Program and a statement on the first page that the importance of complete and accurate information on every application cannot be over emphasized. She referenced a statement on page 7 of the application, public comment was received at a meeting held on April 11, 2012 and followed up with written survey results that were collected April 25, 2012. The response was overwhelmingly positive with all respondents supporting the concept of a dedicated bicycle and pedestrian facility in this corridor. The majority stated additional support for park and trail amenities such as benches, picnic tables and artwork and several stated the project would provide significant economic benefit to the nearby businesses. Some requested that additional information be provided when plans were ready to be advanced and some individuals wanted to be informed about the progress of decisions throughout the planning stages of the project. To date there have been no negative comments reported. Councilmember Bloom referred to a citizen’s public records request regarding the April 11, 2012 meeting and the survey results which he provided to the Council. She noted the survey results included numerous negative comments as well as comments that could be characterized as neutral or need more information. That information was confirmed by staff who prepared a graph of positive, neutral and negative comments. Councilmember Bloom asked why it was represented in the August 2013 PSRC application that no negative comments were received to date. Mr. Williams responded everyone in attendance at the April 11, 2012 meeting was in favor; some completed surveys after the meeting and mailed them in. All those surveys were positive as well. When the consultant prepared the PSRC application she was not provided access to any information other than what existed in that file. After that information was gathered, the survey was posted on the website and electronic responses were submitted. Those surveys had not been collated or evaluated at the time of the application to the Recreation Conservation Office (RCO) that was submitted shortly after the meeting. A total of 150 surveys have been received and although they have not been universally positive; approximately 82% are positive. Since August much more information has been obtained regarding concerns with the project via a public meeting in December as well as before and after that meeting. Councilmember Bloom inquired about the right-of-way owned by BNSF. Mr. Williams answered the right-of-way begins as a very narrow sliver north of Edmonds Street, expands to 8-10 feet wide and narrows again to a point at the end of Sunset Avenue at about Caspers. Packet Page 9 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 6 Councilmember Bloom referred to section C1b on page 8 of the PSRC application that states leave this blank if there are no right-of-way issues and the section is left blank. She referred to a box on page 12 where the box regarding right-of-way costs is marked not applicable. She asked why the right-of-way issues were not presented in the PSRC application when BNSF owns much of the right-of-way. Mr. Williams answered there is a property ownership issue with BNSF regardless of whether the walkway is built as the City currently does not have a lease for that property. The City does not own a significant portion of Sunset Avenue; the street has existed for 70 years. He did not necessarily characterize it as a right-of-way issue; it would need to be discussed with BNSF. BNSF has offered the City a lease which would resolve the issue of whether the City controls the property. The issue is the terms of the lease, including the one-year revocation clause. He was encouraged that BNSF was willing to lease the City the property knowing the intent to use it to repurpose the street as a walkway. A higher level of design is required before discussions can occur with BNSF. Staff has walked the alignment with BNSF representatives a couple times and has not heard any major concerns about the proposal. Councilmember Bloom clarified her understanding of Mr. Williams’ explanation, that those were not right-of-way issues that needed to be communication to PSRC. Mr. Williams answered the application was funding for design; there has not been an application for construction funding because the design phase has not been completed. In view of BNSF’s offer of a lease, he did not consider this a right-of-way issue with the funding agency. Councilmember Bloom summarized there were no other right-of-way issues in the entire design of the project. Mr. Williams answered there are not. Council President Buckshnis thanked everyone who has contact Councilmembers. She referred to the photograph of a cyclist riding the wrong direction on Sunset and asked if the intent was to have cyclists ride south on a northbound one-way street. Mr. Williams explained there is currently a dedicated northbound bike lane. The bike lane will become a sharrow, a shared lane with vehicular traffic. He commented cyclists who travel fast will be comfortable riding in the sharrow; mom/dad with children will be more comfortable on the multi-use path whether traveling north or south. He did not expect to see commuter cyclists on the Sunset Avenue as it is not a major bike commuter route that connects with another commuter trail. He anticipated a serious cyclist traveling through Edmonds would use 3rd Avenue. Council President Buckshnis observed the sharrow would accommodate northbound vehicular and bicycle traffic and leisure bicyclists could travel south on the multi-use path. Mr. Williams clarified the multi-use path is a two-way path; bicyclists using the path will be asked to slow down and meld with pedestrians and other modes of travel. Council President Buckshnis questioned including pedestrians, bicycles, dogs, Segways, strollers, etc. on a 10-foot path. Mr. Williams answered with the number and frequency of users, it will be comfortable. Council President Buckshnis asked if an alternate had been considered, rather than the 12-foot path on the west, moving the path to the east and crossing at the summit. Mr. Williams answered the facility needs to be on the west side as the draw is the view and the views are clearly better on the west side. He anticipated a person in a wheelchair on a path on the east side would look into the side of parked cars and not see the beach. There are also 20 driveways on the east side that a pathway would need to cross, a major safety concern. Council President Buckshnis commented the costs are still unknown, particularly the cost to shore up the bluff. Mr. Williams answered that is not required; a rail could be installed although most would prefer not to have a railing. He anticipated some strengthening of the 150 feet on BNSF property would be required which would benefit BNSF as well as the City. Council President Buckshnis recalled a motion in April for $700,000 for the Sunset Avenue Walkway, and 3 months later the cost is up to $1.4 million. She was concerned with costs due to what happened on Packet Page 10 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 7 76th and Haines Wharf. Mr. Williams explained much of the difference in the cost is work the utilities will do which will be paid for by the Utilities Fund, not grant funds or General Fund. The scope was also expanded to include improvements on Caspers. Originally the project was to end on Sunset. Councilmember Johnson acknowledged there will be engineering challenges associated with this project. Tonight is a planning level design analysis. She noted although some people are definitely for or against the project, tonight’s discussion is about the tradeoffs and community values. She said it would helpful for speakers opposed to the project to identify what would be more acceptable such as a sidewalk instead of a multi-use pathway, whether parallel parking on the north end of Sunset is more important than an unobstructed view, and whether cyclists prefer to ride on a multi-use pathway, a sharrow or dedicated bike lane. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what was envisioned for the railing on the 150 feet. Mr. Williams answered the State standards for a multi-use pathway without 5 feet of space is a railing 54 inches high. The design of the railing is yet to be determined; the height is required so a bicycle does not go over the top. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether bikes, skateboards and Segways can use Edmonds sidewalks. Mr. Williams answered Segways can but skateboards and bikes cannot. Councilmember Petso agreed with Councilmember Johnson’s requests for information. She was interested in the public’s input regarding a sidewalk versus a multi-use pathway or leaving the narrow portion of the street largely as it is and taking the project only as far as Edmonds Street. She was also interested in comment on parallel parking and the sharrow versus bike lane. She commented the south portion of the project is acceptable to many, the Caspers portion of the project is acceptable to many and most of the comments are on the narrow railroad portion of the project. There are options for that section that were not necessarily described by staff such as 5-foot sidewalk, 8 feet for parking, a 12-foot travel lane and leaving the bike lane as is. She requested the public indicate whether they were interested in having that option designed. Mayor Earling opened the opportunity for public comment. Sally Wassall, Edmonds, resident of Sunset Avenue, expressed her strong opposition to the Sunset Walkway. She recently learned Sunset Avenue is designated as a geologically hazardous area by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, landslide in earthquake or other geological events. She quoted from the City’s critical areas reconnaissance report that geologically hazardous areas pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. When she relayed her concern to staff that building a walkway on Sunset would give people a false sense of security since the proposed walkway may appear safe but is not due to the underlying custer fine sandy loom soil, she was told the City would stabilize the area with gravel. The grant request does not include any funds for ground stabilization. She anticipated stabilizing the bluff from Caspers Street to Bell Street would be necessary and expensive in view of stabilization being done to prevent slides onto the railroad tracks in other areas. She anticipated taxpayers would pay for the bluff stabilization, much of it on BNSF property. She observed the word “safety is repeated five times in the grant request; building a walkway on the bluff beside the railroad tracks or on geologically hazardous area is not safe. Freight on the railroad tracks shake the tracks and cause movement of the soil. Ed Caspers, Edmonds, relayed his opposition to the Sunset Walkway project. When he first learned of the project, he contacted the engineering department about upgrading the asphalt walk in front of his home and intended to offer financial support if it could be incorporated into the project. He was unaware Packet Page 11 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 8 of the magnitude of this project, believing it only a sidewalk and not half the street. In January 2008 he granted the City an easement; in exchange the City agreed to install two concrete driveway aprons within the existing sidewalk. He anticipated one of the driveway aprons would be removed by this project. When the City received his easement, a sidewalk was constructed on Caspers Street and he had a fence installed. If the walkway project proceeds, his fence will be inches from traffic. Caspers is a staging area for heavy equipment on Hanna Park and Cary Road; in its present form there is little room for equipment and UPS and Fed Ex deliveries hamper traffic. Getting his pickup and RV out of his driveway is difficult now, and probably impossible with this new sidewalk project. He urged the Council to drop this project. Jerry Tays, Edmonds, thanked Councilmembers for responding to his questions and for Mr. Williams meeting with him. He was confident Mr. Williams knew the ins and outs of the process. In response to Councilmember Petso and Councilmember Johnson’s questions, he is neither for or against the project; he is a frequent user of the area and appreciated its availability. His concern was utilizing grant money on property in which the City had no real property interest. There currently are City improvements including a pump station, drainage facilities and Sunset Avenue on property BNSF owns; he has yet to hear a satisfactory answer to how that is possible. Risk and protecting public dollars are issues that need to be addressed. Staff indicated it had been done for 70 years and he questioned whether that suggested adverse possession. Eric Soul, Edmonds, expressed support for the project, commenting if this area were considered a park, it would have more use than most other parks in the City. There is currently a narrow sidewalk and many people walk in the street or on an unpaved footpath. A better facility would make it a better place for all users, more people would be drawn to downtown businesses, and it would attract tourists. This project is a legitimate function of government; providing these services to the entire population of Edmonds. He noted change is a certainty including increased density due to Comprehensive Plan changes, zoning, and new transportation facilities. He summarized there may be more traffic but it would benefit the entire City. Marilyn Lindberg, Edmonds, a resident on Sunset Avenue, recalled when BNSF planned a 4-foot fence along Sunset Avenue in 1995, residents collected over 1,000 signatures opposing the fence. After nearly 6 years, the idea of a fence was dropped. She pointed out if residents do not bother BNSF, BNSF does not bother them. She feared proposing a sidewalk on and next to BNSF property would result in repercussions, particularly since the Department of Natural Resources deems Sunset Avenue to be a seismic geologically hazardous area. She urged the Council to consider this information and suggested leaving well enough alone when there are currently no problems. Rick Hedges, Edmonds, requested Sunset Avenue be left as it is. He disagreed with the proposed 12-foot dedicated walkway, anticipating it would increase the risk of accidents by increasing congestion, usage density and making it easier to cross from east to west. It is currently illegal to ride a bicycle or skateboard on a sidewalk in Edmonds; he questioned why the 2,000 feet on Sunset should be the only mixed-use walkway in the City. He suggested a 5-foot walkway accessible to handicapped users and pedestrians only, a separate bike lane and parking the full length of Sunset. Residents on Sunset rely on the availability of street parking for family and guests; narrowing the road will require service vehicles to park illegally, increasing congestion. Moving traffic flow to the east curb will require driving on the downward angle of the road crown. Vehicles currently stop along the curb to enjoy the view when no parking is available; in the proposed plan vehicles will stop in the roadway. Other issues include whether the walkway will trigger BNSF to install a fence; bank stability; safety of pedestrians, bikers, skateboards; ingress/egress of residents’ driveways; police and aid vehicle access; driving on an angle; and the need for better stormwater systems. He did not trust Mr. Williams and believed the project was grant driven using federal funds. It was not in the community’s best interest or the residents of Sunset. He attended meetings and voiced concerns; yet the grant application indicated comments were generally favorable. Packet Page 12 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 9 Nathan Proudfoot, Edmonds, an EDC member but speaking as private citizen, clarified the dashed line on the visual is the BNSF property line. He explained angle parking is not ideal for cyclists as backing vehicles can be hazardous. He suggested either a bike lane or making the trail bigger for use by cyclists, suggesting a sharrow and a nearby pathway did not make sense. His feelings toward the proposed project were mixed; the current configuration eliminated his favorite parking place to watch planes, trains and boats. Many people spend their day parked along Sunset; that ability would be eliminated. He recognized the project would increase economic development. Kirsten Foot, Edmonds, expressed support for some kind of enhanced walkway along Sunset Avenue; she was ambivalent about the multi-use path. If multi-use is possible, she could envision great advantage, recalling being unable to push a stroller on Sunset due to the many interferences on the sidewalk side and nowhere for a stroller on the west side. She and her child now walk and picnic on Sunset and would love a walkway that allowed multi-use. She suggested considering the design of other multi-use paths such as Green Lake where a painted line divides pedestrians and wheeled users and allows like-mobile people to travel in the same direction. Elise Foot, Edmonds, said she would love to have a big sidewalk on Sunset Avenue and might go there every week. Her family visits Sunset for beach dinners and she would love to walk on a walkway after dinner. Don Hall, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the Sunset Avenue Walkway project, stating this project is for all Edmonds residents and visitors. The west side of Sunset is not ADA accessible; people using wheelchairs, canes, scooters should have access to the west side to see the beach, trains, tide pools and other beach activities none of which are visible from the east side. This is a sidewalk and street project but also a mini -park and should be accessible to all. Safety is a big issue, the current muddy rut on the west side is an accident waiting to happen and should be improved. In his experience, most of the people on Sunset walk in the street because the sidewalk on the east is not wide enough and bicycles use the road. He encouraged the Council to move the project forward to the point whether a determination can be made about whether it can be done. Jeanne McConnell, Edmonds, commented her family spends a significant amount of time enjoying the Edmonds waterfront, walking, biking and running on Sunset Avenue. The Sunset Avenue project provides an incredible opportunity to expand the use of the waterfront and enhance safety in that area. Other families and young people are supportive of the Sunset Walkway project. Will McConnell, Edmonds, said he would like to see the Sunset Avenue walkway built because he currently has to ride in the road to pass people on his bike. A walkway would be safer for him and other kids to see the water and the ferry without cars in the way. Olivia McConnell, Edmonds, recommended carrying on with the planning of this project for many reasons, 1) she and her friends and family like to ride bikes, scooters, skateboards and roller blades but cannot do so on Sunset because of the dirt path and riding on the sidewalk requires going into the road to pass people which is very dangerous, 2) she enjoys the view and watching boats, 3) she likes sitting on the benches, and 4) the one-way road is wide enough to add the walkway. She recommended the project also include additional benches. Olivia Clark, Edmonds, said the waterfront is one of her favorite spots and she often runs there with her dad. That has been difficult in recent years because the crowds require running in the bike lane or street to pass people. She has had multiple incidents running into people. A multi-use path on the west side would make it easier for everyone. Packet Page 13 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 10 Thalia Moutsanides, Edmonds, Sunset Avenue resident, said the goals of the Sunset Avenue Walkway project have been the exact opposite of what the street needs. The embankment is currently identified as a seismic hazard zone due to the possible of erosion or slides. This project proposes to solve this by directing water toward the street instead of down the embankment; she doubted the proposed project could capture all the rainfall and direct it to an improved City storm drain system. Rainfall will affect the embankment unless it is shored up and the outcome of tampering with the embankment is unknown. The project proposes promoting safety by encouraging people on wheeled devices to use a paved area near the embankment to prevent people being hit by cars. She had never seen an accident between a car and pedestrian or wheeled device in the 28 years she has lived on Sunset; the proposed project is intended to fix a problem that does not exist. Encouraging people on wheeled devices to use a multi-use path close the embankment would almost certainly decrease safety and possibly lead to a lawsuit. She doubted those proposing the project had visited Sunset Avenue to observe daytime/nighttime movement of users; if they had, the proposal would be a 5-foot walkway on the west side. She was opposed to eliminating parallel parking. She was also concerned BNSF has not been included in discussions and feared that could adversely affect this project and the City’s relationship with BNSF. She summarized she and her neighbors believe the goal of the project is to misuse grant money for beautification with no elements of practicality. There are many unknowns and she anticipated the cost would far exceed the current budget. Richard Blacklow, Edmonds, agreed this is a grant-driven project but that did not mean it was wrong. He did not have a final opinion regarding the project but tends in favor because it improves accessibility for everyone. A resident of Caspers, he suggested future meetings incorporate artist renderings of Caspers Street and enlarging the section in the slideshow. He relayed several questions, l) whether the existing sidewalks on the south side of Caspers would remain, 2) whether new signs are proposed as part of the project, and 3) whether the project includes taking any property from existing rights-of-way or private owners. He noted vehicles traveling at slow speeds on Sunset speed up on Caspers. Mark Moody, Edmonds, resident on the south side of Caspers, expressed support for previous speakers’ comments. He was in favor of some form of improvement; he often walks his dog on Sunset and has endured the mud. He appreciated the City trying to make enhancements to benefit all residents. He agreed it would helpful to have the same level of detail regarding the improvements on Caspers Street. He expressed support for Mr. Blacklow’s comments. Kimberly Wayne, Edmonds, said the current layout of Sunset between Bell and Caspers allows pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles to enjoy the views in all seasons. It is a unique area where the views can be enjoyed from a car. When she visited Sunset today in the pouring rain, there were 23 parked cars and 4 pedestrians. She noted the blue skies depicted in the rendering were not the experience most days of the year and she appreciates the ability to enjoy the view from her car when it rains. One of the goals was to improve safety; safety is not improved by the project, 1) young cyclists, roller bladers, toddlers in a narrow area five feet from the bluff is dangerous and 2) eliminating parking will increase the number of people driving along looking at the view. She questioned allocating resources to improve an area that seemed to be working. Lynn Akerold, Edmonds, commented she loves walking on the waterfront all the way to the marina. Sunset Avenue is unique because people can enjoy the gorgeous view from their car especially during the rain. She and others in their cars watched four seals playing in the water this past Sunday in the rain. She noted angle parking would impact views from vehicles and make it difficult to back in/out. She suggested the area where the benches and picnic tables are be made accessible for wheelchairs. Jim Wassall, Edmonds, expressed his strong opposition to the walkway project. He noted disabled people unable to exit their vehicles park on Sunset to enjoy the view; if the walkway is constructed, there Packet Page 14 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 11 is no parking on the west side, eliminating the view from parked vehicles. Angle parking is a common practice today to enjoy the sunset. The geological hazard designation has been in the ECDC and the critical areas inventory since approximately 2005, likely after the 6.8 magnitude Nisqually earthquake in February 2001. The Public Works Director and grant writer know this is a hazardous area and have ignored the danger and additional expense that will be incurred. Jim Wilkinson, Edmonds, a resident on Sunset Avenue, spoke in favor of the project. He thanked staff for the meeting in January, finding the information, format and presentation very informative. He was offended that a small, vocal group of people at that meeting tried to take over the meeting, wanted to change the format and force a vote. He understood the project would cause disruptions and parking would be lost but everyone has a right to use the waterfront. There is currently no parking after 10:00 p.m., his visitors either carpool, park in his backyard or park elsewhere. Walkability and developing the waterfront for the enjoyment of all is very important in most cities; losing a few parking spaces is a not a big deal. To those with seismic concerns, he pointed a stadium was constructed in Seattle on this type of soil. He suggested changing the culture of fear and negativity to working together to make the project happen. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Mike Echelbarger, Edmonds, resident on Sunset Avenue, suggested this meeting and any consideration of terminating the project is premature. Staff has plans that increase parking to 51 parking spaces and it was his understanding the Police Chief supports the proposal. With regard to concern with slide hazards, he pointed out much of Sunset Avenue does not have storm sewers and water flows over the bluff; this project will provide storm sewers. He feared the low-speed fatal car-pedestrian accident that occurred on Walnut was a potential on Sunset due to foot traffic in the street. He noted 82% of the survey respondents are in favor of this project and comments tonight have been approximately 50-50 in support/opposition. Most of the residents on Sunset are opposed to the project; residents in other areas support it. He objected to concepts that, 1) move the sidewalk to the east side because the attraction is on the west side of the street, 2) construct a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side because that is less than is required in a dead-end cul-de-sac, or 3) eliminate the sidewalk on the east side. Bill Regsdorf, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the project, finding it made a lot of sense and would make Sunset a nicer place for residents and visitors. He envisioned after the project is built, people will recall when it was only a narrow dirt path. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented Sunset is a very special residential neighborhood that has become very public and that use has been accommodated over the years via minor traffic modifications such as a one-way street and changing the parking configuration. The proposed project completely changes the use of the neighborhood, making Sunset a recreational playground. He often parks on Sunset to enjoy the view and disagreed with reducing the number of parking spaces. People who enjoy the view from their vehicle have as much right as people who walk in the area. If anything is done, he recommended providing a hard surface pathway/sidewalk. He suggested moving the curb six feet to the east, moving parking east six feet and installing an asphalt west of the curb. He suggested installing improvements on the south end closer to downtown. Residents on Sunset fought for their neighborhood when BNSF proposed a fence. He anticipated an over-zealous walkway project would result in BNSF installing a fence and he recommended returning to a simpler project. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed public comment. Councilmember Petso observed there appeared to be unanimous approval of the project south of Edmonds Street. There are numerous concerns starting at the summit portion with regard to railroad ownership of the right-of-way. There are numerous concerns with the railroad portion including loss of parallel parking Packet Page 15 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 12 spaces. More details are requested for the Caspers portion of the project including an artist’s rendering. She observed the prospect of terminating the project no longer exists as there is agreement on the project south of Edmonds Street. She asked for more details regarding the Caspers portion and on two schematic ideas, 1) no change in the railroad portion, and 2) a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side of the railroad portion retaining the existing parking. She also suggested preparing a comparison of advantages and disadvantages. She recommended taking further public input on those aspects of the project. Council President Buckshnis said her concern was the cost of shoring up bluff and the use of Utility Funds which are also taxpayer dollars. She asked for additional information including the estimated cost of shoring up the bluff. Councilmember Petso offered to work with staff on an analysis of alternatives for the parts of the project under question and have it reviewed by the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee and then to Council for further public input. Mayor Earling suggested staff address the questions that were raised. Councilmember Johnson expressed her support for a hard surface. The present social path is inadequate and she was interested in something more substantial. Council President Buckshnis asked about scheduling. Mr. Williams responded conceptual answers could be provided to the questions raised tonight as soon as the March 18 Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee meeting. Mayor Earling requested Mr. Williams advise Council President Buckshnis of a specific date by tomorrow. 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported he had the great pleasure to walk his daughter down the aisle in Phoenix, Arizona this weekend. It was a fabulous experience and a delight to witness his daughter’s wedding. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Buckshnis reported the retreat is fast approaching; a tentative agenda will be posted on the extended agenda. She requested agenda items be submitted by March 6. Council President Buckshnis commended staff on the City’s receipt of a clean financial audit from the Washington State Auditor. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed Councilmember Peterson and she interviewed two candidates to assist the Council with strengthening trust, communication, cooperation between Councilmembers and between the Mayor and City Council. The individual that both she and Councilmember Peterson agreed on is able to come to the retreat for an hour to describe his approach. She sought Council approval to enter into a contract with this individual. Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite reported three individuals were identified, one was unavailable. The two individuals come highly recommended by other jurisdictions and people in Edmonds. Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Peterson interviewed both and found Jim Reed’s collaborative style a good fit for the City. Mr. Reed provided a scope of work that was evaluated by Councilmembers Fraley- Monillas and Peterson. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT UP TO $6,000 WITH THE FALCONER GROUP. Packet Page 16 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 13 Councilmember Petso inquired about a funding source. Council President Buckshnis answered City Council professional services. Councilmember Johnson asked whether anyone has worked with this individual before. Ms. Hite answered the City of Edmonds hired Mr. Reed last year to do some conflict resolution at the treatment plant; he provided excellent services. That was a different scope of work but he came highly recommended and staff was very impressed with him. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said Mr. Reed’s scope of work includes one-on-one interviews with councilmembers, the mayor and directors. He is a very good listener and this is likely the best place to start. She was seeking Council approval tonight so that he could attend the retreat. Councilmember Bloom expressed concern that this discussion was occurring during Council Comments instead of as an agenda item. She had not had an opportunity to review the scope of work and was not prepared to vote. She suggested delaying a decision until next week. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether Mr. Reed could be included in the retreat agenda if a decision was delayed until next week. Ms. Hite advised Mr. Reed is available for an introductory discussion on March 14 after 11:00 a.m. She recommended the Council enter into a contract with him before the retreat. She will confirm that he can wait until Tuesday, March 11 to confirm his attendance on March 14. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. 10. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:31 p.m. Packet Page 17 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 4, 2014 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Diane Buckshnis, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Strom Peterson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Doug Fair, Municipal Court Judge Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE QUALIFICATIONS OF A CANDIDATE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) AND TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session to discuss the qualifications of a candidate for public employment per RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) and to discuss potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 60 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. Action may occur in open session as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Petso and Bloom. Councilmember Petso left the executive session at 6:50 p.m. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Senior Planner Kernen Lien and City Clerk Scott Passey. At 7:07 p.m. Mayor Earling announced to the public present in the Council Chambers that an additional 10 minutes would be required in executive session. The executive session concluded at 7:11 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:14 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Peterson. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD PUBLIC COMMENT TO AGENDA ITEM 7. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 18 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 2 COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 2014 B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #207238 THROUGH #207321 DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2014 FOR $326,674.58. APPROVAL OF REISSUED CHECK #207322 DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2014 FOR $75.00 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, requested the City enforce the 20 mph speed limit on Sunset Avenue and suggested the use of radar signage or police emphasis. He noted the 20 mph speed limit was only enforced in school zones. 6. 2013 MUNICIPAL COURT REPORT Municipal Court Judge Doug Fair thanked Court Administrator Joan Ferebee, Assistance Police Chief Jim Lawless and Probation Officer Sherrie Leyda for their assistance with compiling the information for the report. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of filings 2006 to 2013, explaining filing increased in 2013 to 7,809, returning to historic levels. Filing during the past 5 years have been 7,700 to 7,900 filings. Filings in 2012 were down to 6,325 due to patrol officers who were off duty for a portion of the year as a result of injuries. He explained courts are primarily reactive in nature; workloads are driven by court filings and impacted by the Legislature, Council decisions and Police Department staffing. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of case filings by year 2008-2013, highlighting traffic infractions, other infractions, parking, DUI, criminal traffic and criminal non-traffic. When the police officers in traffic returned to duty, traffic, parking and criminal traffic infractions returned to normal levels. He expected to see a drop in overall criminal findings in 2013 due to the legalization of marijuana. In 2012 there were 75 marijuana and related paraphernalia cases. The voters’ approval of an initiative to provide easier access to alcohol also made access easier for criminals. Although there was a reduction in marijuana cases, there was an increase in Theft 3 due to increased accessibility to alcohol. There were 39 marijuana cases in 2012 and 3 in 2013; paraphernalia cases decreased from 71 to 45 (primarily for harder drugs). Thefts increased from 144 to 201, an increase of 57 or 40%. He pointed out this illustrated how a change in law affected the court and an unintended consequence of making liquor more accessible. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of year-to-year revenues, explaining gross revenues increased from $1.18 million in 2012 to $1.26 million in 2013. Net revenue, after reimbursements to the State, was $812,274. Revenue projections for 2013 were very conservative; actual was approximately 18% over projected revenues. Revenues exceeded expenses by approximately $81,000. Judge Fair Judge Fair displayed an Expenditure Status Report, explaining net expenses were $1,386 over original budget estimates. He anticipated 2014 expenses may be higher due to unexpected expenditures. He reminded courts are not generally an overall revenue generator because the court’s budget does not Packet Page 19 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 3 include the public defender, prosecutor, jail expenses, etc. which included in the executive’s budget. He summarized public safety is an expensive, worthwhile endeavor. Judge Fair displayed a comparison of passport revenue explaining 467 passports were processed in 2013, a slight decrease but generated $11,000 in revenue. Over the past 5 years, passport applications have averaged 500/year. Judge Fair explained the court continues to save the City a substantial amount by using alternatives to confinement such as electronic home monitoring (EHM), alcohol monitoring bracelets, work release and community service. These alternatives saved the City approximately $172,000 in 2013. He noted many of the offenders in Edmonds Municipal Court are low level, low risk, first time offenders. Providing them an opportunity for community service, work release or EHM is better putting them in jail. Statistics show putting low level, low risk offenders with high risk, high level offenders results in more high risk, high level offenders. Judge Fair reported the video in-custody calendar continues to work well; instead of bringing prisoners to the court for in-custody hearings, it is done by video. Defendants remain at the jail with their attorneys and he and the prosecutor are in the court. This is improves safety and saved the City approximately $28,000 the first year, a total of $100,000 since the program began. The video in-custody calendar also allows the court to see approximately twice the number of defendants. Judge Fair thanked the Council for restoring his half-time clerk. He relayed the court’s plans to continue exploring the possibility of online payments. He reported on plans for an electronic filing system, whereby documents could be scanned into an electronic file, eliminating the need for paper files and making documents electronically retrievable. It was hoped this could be combined as part of the City Clerk’s laser fiche system but that system did not provide the features the court needed. Approximately $50,000 in State funds been compiled in the Court Improvement Fund that will be used to implement an electronic filing system. Judge Fair announced the City’s Probation Officer Sherrie Leyda plans to leave the City after 23 years. He thanked her for her service and wished her the best as she relocates to the east coast. Judge Fair relayed there will be increases in the public defender costs as well as jail costs. The jail is considering a tiered system; a basic rate for an average system, a higher rate for prisoners requiring medical and a higher rate for prisoners requiring mental health services. Judge Fair announced he plans to run for Snohomish County District Court South Division Position 3; Judge Carol McRae is not filing for reelection. If he is successful, he will remain as Edmonds Municipal Court Judge through the end of 2014. He relayed a list of his endorsements. He thanked Councilmembers for their support of his plans and for the support they have given him in the past. He said it has been a privilege and a pleasure to serve as Edmonds Municipal Court Judge for the past eight years. Council President Buckshnis thanked Judge Fair for his thorough presentation. She commented on seeing Judge Fair in action when she served on jury duty. Mayor Earling reported the salary Edmonds pays its Municipal Court Judge is substantially less than surrounding courts. The Citizens Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials will begin meeting next week. He anticipated in the near future he will present a budget amendment to increase the Municipal Court Judge’s salary. 7. DISCUSSION, POTENTIAL ACTION AND PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING MODIFYING OR TERMINATING SUNSET WALKWAY Packet Page 20 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 4 Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the reasons for this project include view access, improved safety and providing accessibility. He displayed several photographs of the view from the west edge of Sunset Avenue, of people walking in the street and a bicycle riding the wrong way on Sunset Avenue to illustrate safety issues, and of the dirt path on the west side of the curb to illustrate accessibility issues. Mr. Williams described what is included in the project: • 2,000 foot long multi-use pathway on Sunset o For use primarily by pedestrians but also including wheelchairs, stroller, roller blades, bicycles, Segways, walkers and other non-motorized traffic to connect waterfront walkways to 3rd Avenue • 500 feet of improvements will be constructed on Caspers • 100% ADA accessible • Benches, art work • Continued access to almost all parking on Sunset Mr. Williams described what is NOT included in the project: • Trees • Tall or unshielded lights • Fencing – some limited railing (150 +/- feet) may be necessary Mr. Williams described the public process/information to date: • Project placed on City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2011 – public comment taken, also placed on 2012 and 2013 CIP • Added to Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) in 2011 after public comment and Council approval • Council resolution adopted to apply for funding – 2011 • Public survey and public meeting – 2011 • “Sunset Avenue Overlook” project has been in Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan since 2008 and was just recently placed in the PROS 2014 Plan • Press release issued when initial $159,000 grant received Mr. Williams identified discussion points: • Parking – current proposal retains 43 of 55 existing spaces. Additional design work could increase that to 51 • Circulation – current circulation patterns are retained (one way northbound north of Edmonds) • Driveway access and turning radii are protected or improved • Emergency vehicles, refuse trucks, and other delivery vehicles will be accommodated better than today. Total of 18 feet of pavement: o 10-foot walkway o 2-foot mountable curb o 6 foot clear zone o 12-foot sharrow (travel lane for vehicles and bicycles) • Caspers Street goes to a “shared street” concept • Specific design features ie: artwork benches railing crosswalks, etc. • BNSF coordination o Need higher level design before entering into meaningful discussion • Seismic hazard o Much of SODO area in Seattle built in similar seismic hazard areas Packet Page 21 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 5 Councilmember Petso asked how much roadway width was needed for a travel lane. Mr. Williams responded it depends on speeds. In this case a 1-way 12-foot travel lane is proposed which would accommodate higher speeds. The speeds on Sunset are very low; as the roadway will be used as a sharrow, it makes sense to have 12 feet. He noted the lanes on Main Street where there is considerably more traffic are 11 feet wide. Councilmember Petso asked whether a sharrow improves safety compared to the current travel lane and bike lane. Mr. Williams answered a definitive statement could not be made one way or the other; the safety on Sunset is currently enhanced by the 20 mph speed limit; bicycles function well in both configurations. Councilmember Petso referred to the additional five feet on the west to avoid the need for a fence. She asked if the five feet is needed for a sidewalk or only a multi-use path. Mr. Williams answered wherever there is a change in terrain where people are encouraged to walk where they could fall, good engineering practices would suggest a flat area next to the identified walkway. Councilmember Petso asked whether the extra 5 feet would be necessary for a 4-foot sidewalk. Mr. Williams answered yes. Verbatim transcript of Councilmember Bloom’s questions and Mr. William’s responses Councilmember Bloom: Mr. Williams, I have some questions about the public process as represented in the Puget Sound Regional Council application. And I’ve asked you these questions; I just want to ask them in the public record. Mr. Williams: Sure. Councilmember Bloom: So the application that was filed to the Puget Sound Regional Council was to qualify us for transportation alternatives program, correct? Public Works Director Phil Williams: Yes. Councilmember Bloom: And that’s a federal program? Mr. Williams: Yes. Councilmember Bloom: So the attachment on the agenda is the full application that was submitted to Puget Sound Regional Council. The first page of it says the importance of complete and accurate information on every application cannot be over emphasized. And I just want to reference that on page 7 of the Puget Sound Regional Council application it was stated, public comment was received at a meeting held on April 11, 2012, you referenced it in your list, and followed up with written survey results that were collected April 25, 2012. The response was overwhelmingly positive with all respondents supporting the concept of a dedicated bicycle and pedestrian facility in this corridor. The majority stated additional support for park and trail amenities such as benches, picnic tables and artwork and several stated the project would provide significant economic benefit to the nearby businesses. Some requested that additional information be provided when plans were ready to be advanced and some individuals wanted to be informed about the progress of decisions throughout the planning stages of the project. To date there have been no negative comments recorded. That application was submitted in August 2013, correct? Packet Page 22 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 6 Mr. Williams: Correct. Councilmember Bloom: Okay. My question, following that, a citizen made a public record request regarding the April 11, 2012 meeting and the survey results from that. And he actually provided that to all of the Councilmembers, the survey results, and there were numerous negative comments in the list of survey results as well as comments that could be characterized as neutral or need more information. So, and that information has been confirmed by your staff. I know they even did a kind of a graph of how many comments were negative, positive and neutral. So could you please explain why it was represented in the Puget Sound Regional Council application of August 2013 that there were no negative comments received to date? Mr. Williams: Sure. I, at the meeting that was referred to earlier in that statement that you read in the application talked about the public meeting in April 2012. At that meeting, everyone was in favor of it and that was the case at that time. Some of the people at the meeting didn’t fill out surveys at the meeting but they took the paper surveys home and mailed them in later which we kept. All of those were positive as well. When this application was prepared, it was prepared by our consultant. I don’t think we had, just overlooked it, gave her access to anything more than what we had in that file. But subsequently, after those things were gathered, as I said earlier this evening, we actually left the survey on the web and we got a whole bunch of electronic responses. Those hadn’t been, number one, reduced to paper, they hadn’t been collated or really evaluated because they weren’t part of the application at that time which was an application to the RCO, Resource Conservation Recovery, I apologize, Recreation Conservation Office, I’m thinking of another job I had I think. And that application was sent in shortly after the public meeting and shortly after those physical surveys were received, that’s what they got in that application and yet these surveys kept coming in. We didn’t even look at them for a number of months. And that just didn’t get communicated to the consultant. Mr. Williams: The truth is we got, as I said, some 150 of them now. We’ve been through those, and no, they are not universally positive. There’s about an 82%, 82% of them give or take, I had 2 people go through them so they, it wasn’t just one person’s opinion as to whether it was positive, negative or neutral. Both of them came up with the same amount, 82% were positive. I think that’s the facts. That is not exactly what obviously the application said in August of last year and certainly since August we’ve gotten much more information as to who has concerns about the project and what those concerns are, both at our public meeting in December and shortly before that and certainly since then as well. Councilmember Bloom: Okay, thank you. And then one other question, on page 8, this is related to right-of-way issues with Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad that owns a large portion of the property. And is it from Edmonds Street to Caspers? Am I correct that it’s pretty much that chunk that is between Edmonds Street and where… Mr. Williams: Right. It starts out as a really narrow little sliver just north of Edmonds Street and it grows to about maybe eight to ten feet wide, talking about the curb now, the western curb, and then narrows down again all the way out to a point out at the end of Sunset Avenue at about Caspers. Packet Page 23 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 7 Councilmember Bloom: Okay. So on the application, on page 8, section C1b, and this is also the Puget Sound Regional Council application, under right-of-way, it says if there are no right-of- way issues, leave it blank. And that section was left blank. And then on page 12, under right-of- way, there’s a kind of a box that has right-of-way issues and then the cost on the side and in that box it says NA, not applicable. Since, so my question is, since BNSF owns a large portion of the property as you’ve described, why were the right-of-way issues not presented in the Puget Sound Regional application? Mr. Williams: Well first, it’s not technically a right-of-way issue. It certainly is a property ownership issue and I get that. I think we all understand the railroad owns an important piece of Sunset Avenue. Whether you build this walkway or not that’s the case and we don’t have a lease for that property. Street’s been there for 70 years but the truth is there’s a significant chunk of Sunset Avenue right now that we don’t own. I don’t know that I’d necessarily characterize it as a right-of-way issue. It’s something we obviously need to talk to BNSF about. They have offered us a lease. That would actually legally resolve the issue of whether or not we can control that property if we’re leasing it. The issue is the terms of the lease; as I understand those, most people I’ve heard from anyway, it doesn’t sound very comfortable to have a one year revocation clause on a lease. But I think that’s all you’re going to get from the railroad so it requires you to kind of look at what their motivations are. They’re willing to lease us this property knowing that we intend to use it to repurpose this existing street as a walkway. I frankly think that’s encouraging. But to get down and talk details with them is going to require a higher level of design. It could be that that conversation won’t go well; we won’t know until we sit down and talk details with them. We’ve walked the alignment with people from BNSF a couple of times now, haven’t heard any major concerns about what we’re proposing. But that does need to get worked out. I get that. Councilmember Bloom: So I guess my question though is, so you’re saying those aren’t right-of- way issues that didn’t need to be communicated to the Puget Sound Regional Council in this application? Mr. Williams: Well if we have a lease that we can sign right now that leases that property, puts it in our control. We haven’t applied for construction funding for the project yet because we haven’t completed the design phase. We were asking for design money in this application and that’s an issue that we’re going to work out during design. We already have a lease offered to us which gives us the ability to build on the property. Councilmember Bloom: So they’re not considered right-of-way issues? Mr. Williams: I don’t consider that necessarily a right-of-way issue. It may be a finance issue, it may be an issue for the Council if that doesn’t provide enough security for you. That’s an issue but it isn’t necessarily with the funding agency, not if we have a lease. Councilmember Bloom: Okay. Then there are no other right-of-way issues in the entire design of the whole project. Mr. Williams: No. Packet Page 24 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 8 Councilmember Bloom: Other than that? Mr. Williams: Not that we’re aware of, no. Councilmember Bloom: Okay, thank you. End of verbatim transcript of Councilmember Bloom’s questions and Mr. William’s responses. Council President Buckshnis thanked everyone who has contact Councilmembers. She referred to the photograph of a cyclist riding the wrong direction on Sunset and asked if the intent was to have cyclists ride south on a northbound one-way street. Mr. Williams explained there is currently a dedicated northbound bike lane. The bike lane will become a sharrow, a shared lane with vehicular traffic. He commented cyclists who travel fast will be comfortable riding in the sharrow; mom/dad with children will be more comfortable on the multi-use path whether traveling north or south. He did not expect to see commuter cyclists on the Sunset Avenue as it is not a major bike commuter route that connects with another commuter trail. He anticipated a serious cyclist traveling through Edmonds would use 3rd Avenue. Council President Buckshnis observed the sharrow would accommodate northbound vehicular and bicycle traffic and leisure bicyclists could travel south on the multi-use path. Mr. Williams clarified the multi-use path is a two-way path; bicyclists using the path will be asked to slow down and meld with pedestrians and other modes of travel. Council President Buckshnis questioned including pedestrians, bicycles, dogs, Segways, strollers, etc. on a 10-foot path. Mr. Williams answered with the number and frequency of users, it will be comfortable. Council President Buckshnis asked if an alternate had been considered, rather than the 12-foot path on the west, moving the path to the east and crossing at the summit. Mr. Williams answered the facility needs to be on the west side as the draw is the view and the views are clearly better on the west side. He anticipated a person in a wheelchair on a path on the east side would look into the side of parked cars and not see the beach. There are also 20 driveways on the east side that a pathway would need to cross, a major safety concern. Council President Buckshnis commented the costs are still unknown, particularly the cost to shore up the bluff. Mr. Williams answered that is not required; a rail could be installed although most would prefer not to have a railing. He anticipated some strengthening of the 150 feet on BNSF property would be required which would benefit BNSF as well as the City. Council President Buckshnis recalled a motion in April for $700,000 for the Sunset Avenue Walkway, and 3 months later the cost is up to $1.4 million. She was concerned with costs due to what happened on 76th and Haines Wharf. Mr. Williams explained much of the difference in the cost is work the utilities will do which will be paid for by the Utilities Fund, not grant funds or General Fund. The scope was also expanded to include improvements on Caspers. Originally the project was to end on Sunset. Councilmember Johnson acknowledged there will be engineering challenges associated with this project. Tonight is a planning level design analysis. She noted although some people are definitely for or against the project, tonight’s discussion is about the tradeoffs and community values. She said it would helpful for speakers opposed to the project to identify what would be more acceptable such as a sidewalk instead of a multi-use pathway, whether parallel parking on the north end of Sunset is more important than an unobstructed view, and whether cyclists prefer to ride on a multi-use pathway, a sharrow or dedicated bike lane. Packet Page 25 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 9 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what was envisioned for the railing on the 150 feet. Mr. Williams answered the State standards for a multi-use pathway without 5 feet of space is a railing 54 inches high. The design of the railing is yet to be determined; the height is required so a bicycle does not go over the top. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether bikes, skateboards and Segways can use Edmonds sidewalks. Mr. Williams answered Segways can but skateboards and bikes cannot. Councilmember Petso agreed with Councilmember Johnson’s requests for information. She was interested in the public’s input regarding a sidewalk versus a multi-use pathway or leaving the narrow portion of the street largely as it is and taking the project only as far as Edmonds Street. She was also interested in comment on parallel parking and the sharrow versus bike lane. She commented the south portion of the project is acceptable to many, the Caspers portion of the project is acceptable to many and most of the comments are on the narrow railroad portion of the project. There are options for that section that were not necessarily described by staff such as 5-foot sidewalk, 8 feet for parking, a 12-foot travel lane and leaving the bike lane as is. She requested the public indicate whether they were interested in having that option designed. Mayor Earling opened the opportunity for public comment. Sally Wassall, Edmonds, resident of Sunset Avenue, expressed her strong opposition to the Sunset Walkway. She recently learned Sunset Avenue is designated as a geologically hazardous area by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, landslide in earthquake or other geological events. She quoted from the City’s critical areas reconnaissance report that geologically hazardous areas pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. When she relayed her concern to staff that building a walkway on Sunset would give people a false sense of security since the proposed walkway may appear safe but is not due to the underlying custer fine sandy loom soil, she was told the City would stabilize the area with gravel. The grant request does not include any funds for ground stabilization. She anticipated stabilizing the bluff from Caspers Street to Bell Street would be necessary and expensive in view of stabilization being done to prevent slides onto the railroad tracks in other areas. She anticipated taxpayers would pay for the bluff stabilization, much of it on BNSF property. She observed the word “safety is repeated five times in the grant request; building a walkway on the bluff beside the railroad tracks or on geologically hazardous area is not safe. Freight on the railroad tracks shake the tracks and cause movement of the soil. Ed Caspers, Edmonds, relayed his opposition to the Sunset Walkway project. When he first learned of the project, he contacted the engineering department about upgrading the asphalt walk in front of his home and intended to offer financial support if it could be incorporated into the project. He was unaware of the magnitude of this project, believing it only a sidewalk and not half the street. In January 2008 he granted the City an easement; in exchange the City agreed to install two concrete driveway aprons within the existing sidewalk. He anticipated one of the driveway aprons would be removed by this project. When the City received his easement, a sidewalk was constructed on Caspers Street and he had a fence installed. If the walkway project proceeds, his fence will be inches from traffic. Caspers is a staging area for heavy equipment on Hanna Park and Cary Road; in its present form there is little room for equipment and UPS and Fed Ex deliveries hamper traffic. Getting his pickup and RV out of his driveway is difficult now, and probably impossible with this new sidewalk project. He urged the Council to drop this project. Jerry Tays, Edmonds, thanked Councilmembers for responding to his questions and for Mr. Williams meeting with him. He was confident Mr. Williams knew the ins and outs of the process. In response to Councilmember Petso and Councilmember Johnson’s questions, he is neither for or against the project; he Packet Page 26 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 10 is a frequent user of the area and appreciated its availability. His concern was utilizing grant money on property in which the City had no real property interest. There currently are City improvements including a pump station, drainage facilities and Sunset Avenue on property BNSF owns; he has yet to hear a satisfactory answer to how that is possible. Risk and protecting public dollars are issues that need to be addressed. Staff indicated it had been done for 70 years and he questioned whether that suggested adverse possession. Eric Soul, Edmonds, expressed support for the project, commenting if this area were considered a park, it would have more use than most other parks in the City. There is currently a narrow sidewalk and many people walk in the street or on an unpaved footpath. A better facility would make it a better place for all users, more people would be drawn to downtown businesses, and it would attract tourists. This project is a legitimate function of government; providing these services to the entire population of Edmonds. He noted change is a certainty including increased density due to Comprehensive Plan changes, zoning, and new transportation facilities. He summarized there may be more traffic but it would benefit the entire City. Marilyn Lindberg, Edmonds, a resident on Sunset Avenue, recalled when BNSF planned a 4-foot fence along Sunset Avenue in 1995, residents collected over 1,000 signatures opposing the fence. After nearly 6 years, the idea of a fence was dropped. She pointed out if residents do not bother BNSF, BNSF does not bother them. She feared proposing a sidewalk on and next to BNSF property would result in repercussions, particularly since the Department of Natural Resources deems Sunset Avenue to be a seismic geologically hazardous area. She urged the Council to consider this information and suggested leaving well enough alone when there are currently no problems. Rick Hedges, Edmonds, requested Sunset Avenue be left as it is. He disagreed with the proposed 12-foot dedicated walkway, anticipating it would increase the risk of accidents by increasing congestion, usage density and making it easier to cross from east to west. It is currently illegal to ride a bicycle or skateboard on a sidewalk in Edmonds; he questioned why the 2,000 feet on Sunset should be the only mixed-use walkway in the City. He suggested a 5-foot walkway accessible to handicapped users and pedestrians only, a separate bike lane and parking the full length of Sunset. Residents on Sunset rely on the availability of street parking for family and guests; narrowing the road will require service vehicles to park illegally, increasing congestion. Moving traffic flow to the east curb will require driving on the downward angle of the road crown. Vehicles currently stop along the curb to enjoy the view when no parking is available; in the proposed plan vehicles will stop in the roadway. Other issues include whether the walkway will trigger BNSF to install a fence; bank stability; safety of pedestrians, bikers, skateboards; ingress/egress of residents’ driveways; police and aid vehicle access; driving on an angle; and the need for better stormwater systems. He did not trust Mr. Williams and believed the project was grant driven using federal funds. It was not in the community’s best interest or the residents of Sunset. He attended meetings and voiced concerns; yet the grant application indicated comments were generally favorable. Nathan Proudfoot, Edmonds, an EDC member but speaking as private citizen, clarified the dashed line on the visual is the BNSF property line. He explained angle parking is not ideal for cyclists as backing vehicles can be hazardous. He suggested either a bike lane or making the trail bigger for use by cyclists, suggesting a sharrow and a nearby pathway did not make sense. His feelings toward the proposed project were mixed; the current configuration eliminated his favorite parking place to watch planes, trains and boats. Many people spend their day parked along Sunset; that ability would be eliminated. He recognized the project would increase economic development. Kirsten Foot, Edmonds, expressed support for some kind of enhanced walkway along Sunset Avenue; she was ambivalent about the multi-use path. If multi-use is possible, she could envision great advantage, recalling being unable to push a stroller on Sunset due to the many interferences on the sidewalk side and Packet Page 27 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 11 nowhere for a stroller on the west side. She and her child now walk and picnic on Sunset and would love a walkway that allowed multi-use. She suggested considering the design of other multi-use paths such as Green Lake where a painted line divides pedestrians and wheeled users and allows like-mobile people to travel in the same direction. Elise Foot, Edmonds, said she would love to have a big sidewalk on Sunset Avenue and might go there every week. Her family visits Sunset for beach dinners and she would love to walk on a walkway after dinner. Don Hall, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the Sunset Avenue Walkway project, stating this project is for all Edmonds residents and visitors. The west side of Sunset is not ADA accessible; people using wheelchairs, canes, scooters should have access to the west side to see the beach, trains, tide pools and other beach activities none of which are visible from the east side. This is a sidewalk and street project but also a mini -park and should be accessible to all. Safety is a big issue, the current muddy rut on the west side is an accident waiting to happen and should be improved. In his experience, most of the people on Sunset walk in the street because the sidewalk on the east is not wide enough and bicycles use the road. He encouraged the Council to move the project forward to the point whether a determination can be made about whether it can be done. Jeanne McConnell, Edmonds, commented her family spends a significant amount of time enjoying the Edmonds waterfront, walking, biking and running on Sunset Avenue. The Sunset Avenue project provides an incredible opportunity to expand the use of the waterfront and enhance safety in that area. Other families and young people are supportive of the Sunset Walkway project. Will McConnell, Edmonds, said he would like to see the Sunset Avenue walkway built because he currently has to ride in the road to pass people on his bike. A walkway would be safer for him and other kids to see the water and the ferry without cars in the way. Olivia McConnell, Edmonds, recommended carrying on with the planning of this project for many reasons, 1) she and her friends and family like to ride bikes, scooters, skateboards and roller blades but cannot do so on Sunset because of the dirt path and riding on the sidewalk requires going into the road to pass people which is very dangerous, 2) she enjoys the view and watching boats, 3) she likes sitting on the benches, and 4) the one-way road is wide enough to add the walkway. She recommended the project also include additional benches. Olivia Clark, Edmonds, said the waterfront is one of her favorite spots and she often runs there with her dad. That has been difficult in recent years because the crowds require running in the bike lane or street to pass people. She has had multiple incidents running into people. A multi-use path on the west side would make it easier for everyone. Thalia Moutsanides, Edmonds, Sunset Avenue resident, said the goals of the Sunset Avenue Walkway project have been the exact opposite of what the street needs. The embankment is currently identified as a seismic hazard zone due to the possible of erosion or slides. This project proposes to solve this by directing water toward the street instead of down the embankment; she doubted the proposed project could capture all the rainfall and direct it to an improved City storm drain system. Rainfall will affect the embankment unless it is shored up and the outcome of tampering with the embankment is unknown. The project proposes promoting safety by encouraging people on wheeled devices to use a paved area near the embankment to prevent people being hit by cars. She had never seen an accident between a car and pedestrian or wheeled device in the 28 years she has lived on Sunset; the proposed project is intended to fix a problem that does not exist. Encouraging people on wheeled devices to use a multi-use path close the embankment would almost certainly decrease safety and possibly lead to a lawsuit. She doubted those Packet Page 28 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 12 proposing the project had visited Sunset Avenue to observe daytime/nighttime movement of users; if they had, the proposal would be a 5-foot walkway on the west side. She was opposed to eliminating parallel parking. She was also concerned BNSF has not been included in discussions and feared that could adversely affect this project and the City’s relationship with BNSF. She summarized she and her neighbors believe the goal of the project is to misuse grant money for beautification with no elements of practicality. There are many unknowns and she anticipated the cost would far exceed the current budget. Richard Blacklow, Edmonds, agreed this is a grant-driven project but that did not mean it was wrong. He did not have a final opinion regarding the project but tends in favor because it improves accessibility for everyone. A resident of Caspers, he suggested future meetings incorporate artist renderings of Caspers Street and enlarging the section in the slideshow. He relayed several questions, l) whether the existing sidewalks on the south side of Caspers would remain, 2) whether new signs are proposed as part of the project, and 3) whether the project includes taking any property from existing rights-of-way or private owners. He noted vehicles traveling at slow speeds on Sunset speed up on Caspers. Mark Moody, Edmonds, resident on the south side of Caspers, expressed support for previous speakers’ comments. He was in favor of some form of improvement; he often walks his dog on Sunset and has endured the mud. He appreciated the City trying to make enhancements to benefit all residents. He agreed it would helpful to have the same level of detail regarding the improvements on Caspers Street. He expressed support for Mr. Blacklow’s comments. Kimberly Wayne, Edmonds, said the current layout of Sunset between Bell and Caspers allows pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles to enjoy the views in all seasons. It is a unique area where the views can be enjoyed from a car. When she visited Sunset today in the pouring rain, there were 23 parked cars and 4 pedestrians. She noted the blue skies depicted in the rendering were not the experience most days of the year and she appreciates the ability to enjoy the view from her car when it rains. One of the goals was to improve safety; safety is not improved by the project, 1) young cyclists, roller bladers, toddlers in a narrow area five feet from the bluff is dangerous and 2) eliminating parking will increase the number of people driving along looking at the view. She questioned allocating resources to improve an area that seemed to be working. Lynn Akerold, Edmonds, commented she loves walking on the waterfront all the way to the marina. Sunset Avenue is unique because people can enjoy the gorgeous view from their car especially during the rain. She and others in their cars watched four seals playing in the water this past Sunday in the rain. She noted angle parking would impact views from vehicles and make it difficult to back in/out. She suggested the area where the benches and picnic tables are be made accessible for wheelchairs. Jim Wassall, Edmonds, expressed his strong opposition to the walkway project. He noted disabled people unable to exit their vehicles park on Sunset to enjoy the view; if the walkway is constructed, there is no parking on the west side, eliminating the view from parked vehicles. Angle parking is a common practice today to enjoy the sunset. The geological hazard designation has been in the ECDC and the critical areas inventory since approximately 2005, likely after the 6.8 magnitude Nisqually earthquake in February 2001. The Public Works Director and grant writer know this is a hazardous area and have ignored the danger and additional expense that will be incurred. Jim Wilkinson, Edmonds, a resident on Sunset Avenue, spoke in favor of the project. He thanked staff for the meeting in January, finding the information, format and presentation very informative. He was offended that a small, vocal group of people at that meeting tried to take over the meeting, wanted to change the format and force a vote. He understood the project would cause disruptions and parking would be lost but everyone has a right to use the waterfront. There is currently no parking after 10:00 p.m., his visitors either carpool, park in his backyard or park elsewhere. Walkability and developing the waterfront Packet Page 29 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 13 for the enjoyment of all is very important in most cities; losing a few parking spaces is a not a big deal. To those with seismic concerns, he pointed a stadium was constructed in Seattle on this type of soil. He suggested changing the culture of fear and negativity to working together to make the project happen. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Mike Echelbarger, Edmonds, resident on Sunset Avenue, suggested this meeting and any consideration of terminating the project is premature. Staff has plans that increase parking to 51 parking spaces and it was his understanding the Police Chief supports the proposal. With regard to concern with slide hazards, he pointed out much of Sunset Avenue does not have storm sewers and water flows over the bluff; this project will provide storm sewers. He feared the low-speed fatal car-pedestrian accident that occurred on Walnut was a potential on Sunset due to foot traffic in the street. He noted 82% of the survey respondents are in favor of this project and comments tonight have been approximately 50-50 in support/opposition. Most of the residents on Sunset are opposed to the project; residents in other areas support it. He objected to concepts that, 1) move the sidewalk to the east side because the attraction is on the west side of the street, 2) construct a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side because that is less than is required in a dead-end cul-de-sac, or 3) eliminate the sidewalk on the east side. Bill Regsdorf, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the project, finding it made a lot of sense and would make Sunset a nicer place for residents and visitors. He envisioned after the project is built, people will recall when it was only a narrow dirt path. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented Sunset is a very special residential neighborhood that has become very public and that use has been accommodated over the years via minor traffic modifications such as a one-way street and changing the parking configuration. The proposed project completely changes the use of the neighborhood, making Sunset a recreational playground. He often parks on Sunset to enjoy the view and disagreed with reducing the number of parking spaces. People who enjoy the view from their vehicle have as much right as people who walk in the area. If anything is done, he recommended providing a hard surface pathway/sidewalk. He suggested moving the curb six feet to the east, moving parking east six feet and installing an asphalt west of the curb. He suggested installing improvements on the south end closer to downtown. Residents on Sunset fought for their neighborhood when BNSF proposed a fence. He anticipated an over-zealous walkway project would result in BNSF installing a fence and he recommended returning to a simpler project. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed public comment. Councilmember Petso observed there appeared to be unanimous approval of the project south of Edmonds Street. There are numerous concerns starting at the summit portion with regard to railroad ownership of the right-of-way. There are numerous concerns with the railroad portion including loss of parallel parking spaces. More details are requested for the Caspers portion of the project including an artist’s rendering. She observed the prospect of terminating the project no longer exists as there is agreement on the project south of Edmonds Street. She asked for more details regarding the Caspers portion and on two schematic ideas, 1) no change in the railroad portion, and 2) a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side of the railroad portion retaining the existing parking. She also suggested preparing a comparison of advantages and disadvantages. She recommended taking further public input on those aspects of the project. Council President Buckshnis said her concern was the cost of shoring up bluff and the use of Utility Funds which are also taxpayer dollars. She asked for additional information including the estimated cost of shoring up the bluff. Packet Page 30 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 14 Councilmember Petso offered to work with staff on an analysis of alternatives for the parts of the project under question and have it reviewed by the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee and then to Council for further public input. Mayor Earling suggested staff address the questions that were raised. Councilmember Johnson expressed her support for a hard surface. The present social path is inadequate and she was interested in something more substantial. Council President Buckshnis asked about scheduling. Mr. Williams responded conceptual answers could be provided to the questions raised tonight as soon as the March 18 Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee meeting. Mayor Earling requested Mr. Williams advise Council President Buckshnis of a specific date by tomorrow. 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported he had the great pleasure to walk his daughter down the aisle in Phoenix, Arizona this weekend. It was a fabulous experience and a delight to witness his daughter’s wedding. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Buckshnis reported the retreat is fast approaching; a tentative agenda will be posted on the extended agenda. She requested agenda items be submitted by March 6. Council President Buckshnis commended staff on the City’s receipt of a clean financial audit from the Washington State Auditor. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed Councilmember Peterson and she interviewed two candidates to assist the Council with strengthening trust, communication, cooperation between Councilmembers and between the Mayor and City Council. The individual that both she and Councilmember Peterson agreed on is able to come to the retreat for an hour to describe his approach. She sought Council approval to enter into a contract with this individual. Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite reported three individuals were identified, one was unavailable. The two individuals come highly recommended by other jurisdictions and people in Edmonds. Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Peterson interviewed both and found Jim Reed’s collaborative style a good fit for the City. Mr. Reed provided a scope of work that was evaluated by Councilmembers Fraley- Monillas and Peterson. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT UP TO $6,000 WITH THE FALCONER GROUP. Councilmember Petso inquired about a funding source. Council President Buckshnis answered City Council professional services. Councilmember Johnson asked whether anyone has worked with this individual before. Ms. Hite answered the City of Edmonds hired Mr. Reed last year to do some conflict resolution at the treatment plant; he provided excellent services. That was a different scope of work but he came highly recommended and staff was very impressed with him. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said Mr. Reed’s scope of work includes one-on-one interviews with councilmembers, the mayor and directors. He is a very good listener and this is likely the best place to start. She was seeking Council approval tonight so that he could attend the retreat. Packet Page 31 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 4, 2014 Page 15 Councilmember Bloom expressed concern that this discussion was occurring during Council Comments instead of as an agenda item. She had not had an opportunity to review the scope of work and was not prepared to vote. She suggested delaying a decision until next week. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether Mr. Reed could be included in the retreat agenda if a decision was delayed until next week. Ms. Hite advised Mr. Reed is available for an introductory discussion on March 14 after 11:00 a.m. She recommended the Council enter into a contract with him before the retreat. She will confirm that he can wait until Tuesday, March 11 to confirm his attendance on March 14. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. 10. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:31 p.m. Packet Page 32 of 182 AM-6701 4. B. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted By:Linda Hynd Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 18, 2014. Recommendation Review and approve draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached are the draft minutes for review and approval. Attachments 3-18-14 City Council Meeting Draft Minutes Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Dave Earling 03/21/2014 09:54 AM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 10:03 AM Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 03/18/2014 11:50 AM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 33 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES MARCH 18, 2014 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Diane Buckshnis, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Strom Peterson, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Thea Ocfemia, Student Representative STAFF PRESENT Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief Stephen Clifton, Comm. Serv./Econ. Dev. Dir. Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Scott James, Finance Director Rob Chave, Acting Development Services Dir. Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Eng. Program Mgr. Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Prog. Mgr. Rob English, City Engineer Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Mike Clugston, Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PROPERTY ACQUISITION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding property acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 30 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. Action may occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Peterson, Petso, Bloom and Mesaros. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite and Deputy City Clerk Linda Hynd. The executive session concluded at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:01 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO ADD TWO MOTIONS REGARDING CITY PARK AS AGENDA ITEM 5A. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 34 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 2 COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO MOVE ITEM 14 TO ITEM 6A. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Bloom requested Item A be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 11, 2014 C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #207323 THOUGH #207457 DATED MARCH 6, 2014 FOR $191,920.96 AND CLAIM CHECKS #207458 THROUGH #207609 DATED MARCH 13, 2014 FOR $811,682.45. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #60835 THROUGH #60849 FOR $449,055.95, BENEFIT CHECKS #60850 THROUGH #60859 AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $384,976.59 FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 16, 2014 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2014 D. FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES PROJECT ACCEPTANCE E. 2014 JANUARY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT F. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR SR 99 INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT G. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE 76TH AVE W TEMPORARY ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT H. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR 76TH AVE W WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT I. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE INTERURBAN TRAIL PROJECT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT J. APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LAKESHORE INVESTMENT CORP. RELATED TO THE FIVE CORNERS ROUNDABOUT PROJECT K. OFFICE COORDINATOR (SEIU UNION) JOB DESCRIPTION/POSITION- WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT L. UPDATE OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 10.25.090 (REGARDING PROBATIONARY PERIODS FOR PROMOTED OR TRANSFERRED CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL) M. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (ILA) WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR A NATURAL YARD CARE PRACTICES OUTREACH PROGRAM TARGETING HOMEOWNERS N. RENEWAL OF CONTRACT WITH ADIX'S BED AND BATH FOR DOGS AND CATS FOR KENNELING SERVICES Packet Page 35 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 3 O. AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH JAMES FELDMAN FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES ITEM A: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 2014 Councilmember Bloom advised she has requested a verbatim transcript of the portion of Item 7 where she asked Mr. Williams questions about the PSRC application. The verbatim has been provided; she wanted an opportunity to review it. She suggested the verbatim be incorporated in the minutes and the minutes brought back to the Council next week as a draft. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO MOVE ITEM A, APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 2014, TO NEXT WEEK. Councilmember Johnson commented the Council seemed to be moving toward more detailed minutes which was not necessarily in the Council’s best interest. She referred to training the Council was provided by Ann McFarlane and her advice with regard to Robert’s Rules of Order was “the biggest and most common mistake people make with minutes is to try and write down what people say. According to Robert’s Rules, minutes should record what is done and not what is said.” Councilmember Johnson was prepared to adopt the minutes as they were prepared and suggested the Council discontinue the practice of having verbatim minutes. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said that appeared not to be Robert’s Rule of Order but rather Ann’s Rules of Order. She preferred to continue using Robert’s Rules of Order and not someone’s interpretation of Robert’s Rules. Councilmember Bloom advised she requested the verbatim because she felt the written summary did not reflect what happened. She asked the questions so that they would be in the public record and it was important it be in the public record exactly accurate. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Sally Wassall, Edmonds, resident on Sunset Avenue, requested the Council terminate the Sunset Avenue walkway project. She summarized her major objections to the walkway: 1. Their neighborhood fought for six years (1995-2001) to prevent construction of a fence along the bluff on Sunset Avenue. Washington Utilities and Transportation finally agreed not to require a fence as long as a natural barrier of prickly vegetation was maintained to keep people off the railroad tracks. The proposed walkway requires a 54-inch fence. 2. There is also a designated bike lane and sidewalk on the east side of Sunset as well as picnic tables and benches on the west side. 3. Much of the walkway from Caspers to Edmonds Street would be on BNSF right-of-way. The City has used their property for 70 years for free. The proposed walkway would require a $3,000/year lease. 4. The walkway would be close to the railroad tracks. Tanker cars may carry hazardous materials. 5. The bluff is a part of a geologically designated hazard area because the underlying soil, custer fine sandy loam, slides. Edmonds will be required to stabilize the 2,000 foot long bluff ; this cost is not included in the $2 million grant request. Packet Page 36 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 4 Patsy Ethridge Neal, Edmonds Senior Center Board President, thanked the Council for their partnership with the Edmonds Senior Center and their support over the years. She asked the Council to continue that support by supporting the resolution in Agenda Item 8. Marilyn Lindberg, Edmonds, voiced her objection to the Sunset Avenue walkway. She feared citizens would pay for cost overruns due to unforeseen problems. She questioned spending taxpayer money to shore up BNSF’s property to construct a sidewalk, commenting there are more important projects that this sidewalk such as correcting street flooding at intersections, roadway improvements, filling potholes and adding parking downtown. She preferred to address things in need of repair instead of starting a new project that has problems before it even begins. Jim Wassall, Edmonds, asked how the 2011-2012 survey mentioned by Mr. Williams in his presentation was publicized, relaying that he lives on Sunset Avenue and never saw the survey. He disputed the claim that response to the proposed walkway was overwhelmingly positive and said he never saw an article in the Edmonds Beacon about the survey. He suggested establishing a 3-hour parking limit on Sunset, enforcing the 20 mph speed limit, and making the bike lane on the east side 2-way. He reported people using walkers, wheelchairs, crutches and strollers currently walk on the sidewalk on the east side of Sunset and a friend and his wife often park on Sunset to eat their lunch. Farrell Fleming, Edmonds Senior Center Executive Director, voiced his support for the resolution in Agenda Item 8. The resolution is a critical first step in a lengthy process; without it, the endeavor to build a new senior center and community center on the current waterfront site cannot go forward. The City’s Strategic Plan designates the senior center, a 501c3 non-profit organization, as the lead agency to “develop a long term solution for maintaining and updating the senior center.” The 2014-2019 Capital Facilities Plan describes the same project as “replace and enlarge deteriorating senior center building complex on the city waterfront.” The new building will function both as a senior center and as a community center; he envisioned many parks, recreation and cultural service programs in the new center including possibly a teen night on Friday evenings as well as many other community organizations making use of the facility. On behalf of the thousands of seniors and their families who have benefited from the senior center over the past 46 years, he relayed their sincere thanks and appreciation for City staff and elected officials who have helped make the senior center a remarkable place. Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, suggested the new Development Services Director and Finance Director talk to the people who are opposed to the Sunset Avenue walkway. He also commented on revenue forecasts. Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. He suggested holding a public hearing before approving the resolution in Agenda Item 8. He referred to Item 2 in the resolution, the City Council would like to reaffirm the intent of resolution No. 943 which supports the demolition of the current Edmonds Senior Center and construction of a new Edmonds Senior Center at current location. He has heard and there were comments at the retreat that some citizens believe there are other uses for that property. As the resolution was drafted by Council President Buckshnis and she is on the Senior Center Board, he suggested she recuse herself from voting on the resolution. Marta Card, Edmonds Senior Center Board Member, described her interest in creating a community center for Edmonds and the community’s support for building a new senior center. She relayed her question to Harv Harrison about how to most effective and his response, “we’ve been trying to build that center for years and it’s time, you have the right team and I think you should go for it.” She expressed support for the resolution in Agenda Item 8. Rose Cantwell, Edmonds, was proud to have been a member of the Edmonds Senior Center for 15 years and of the non-profit corporation that has operates the facility for 45 years. For at least the past 10 years, Packet Page 37 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 5 the members, staff and volunteers have raised 70% of the center’s operating budget. She requested the Council support the resolution in Agenda Item 8. She relayed the senior center use of the site is a better prospect than luxury condominiums. Dick Van Hollebeke, Edmonds, praised the Council for working together last week to select Thomas Mesaros who he believed would be an excellent Councilmember. As a trustee at Edmonds Community College, he worked with Councilmember Mesaros in the past and found him to be bright, ethical, capable of building consensus and working with a diverse group of people. He commended the Council on holding a retreat last week, certain that it made giant strides in the Council working together. He also commended the Council for hiring a consultant to help the Council work together for the betterment of Edmonds. When he was a Councilmember, his goal was a win-win situation, and while that could not always be accomplished, everyone can row in the same direction for the betterment of Edmonds. Dave Page, Edmonds, welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. He jokingly said Ron Wambolt was a communist. He urged the Council to support the resolution regarding the senior center. He was confident the right people were in place for a successful capital campaign to raise money to build a new senior center. He pointed out the property was deeded to the City with a provision that it be used in perpetuity as a senior center. He concluded no one in the audience at the senior center members meeting was opposed to building a new senior center. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, urged the Council to approve the resolution, assuring the new building would be funded via a capital campaign, not by the City. Next, he advocated for some reasonable use of Sunset Avenue. A visitor to Sunset Avenue for over 40 years, that uses the view, he feared any development on the west side would result in a requirement for a fence which would affect visitors as well as residents. He questioned whether the proposal was a hard surface for people to walk or a recreation area, noting portions of Sunset are quite narrow. He congratulated and welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of personal privilege. She assured Ron Wambolt was not a communist. She also said the resolution regarding the Edmonds Senior Center is from the Council, not an individual Councilmember. Therefore, it was not appropriate to ask Council President Buckshnis not to participate in the vote. Councilmember Johnson questioned the use of point of personal privilege. City Attorney Jeff Taraday read the rule regarding point of personal privilege: “types of questions of privilege: questions of privilege are of two types, 1) those relating to the privilege of the assembly as a whole, and 2) questions of personal privilege. If the two come into competition, the former take precedence over the latter. Questions of the privileges of the assembly may relate to its organization or existence, to the comfort of its members with respect to heating, ventilation, lighting and noise or other disturbance; to the conduct of its officers and employees or of visitors; the punishment of…” Mayor Earling ruled in favor of allowing Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ comments. 5A. MOTION RELATED TO CITY PARK COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO TERMINATE THE CONTRACT WITH MACLEOD RECKORD REGARDING THE CITY PARK PROJECT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO TERMINATE THE CONTRACT WITH AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES REGARDING THE CITY PARK PROJECT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 38 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 6 6. UPDATE ON EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 BY ESD SUPERINTENDENT Nick Brossoit, Edmonds School District Superintendent, advised this is his 10th year as superintendent of the ESD. He expressed his appreciation for the working relationship with Edmonds and other municipalities in the ESD. He thanked the community for their support of the February 11 renewal of the replacement levy and the passage of the bond issue. He referred to an information sheet that was provided to the Council that described progress on major projects in the District and offered to respond to Council questions. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas inquired about the successful levy. Dr. Brossoit explained there were two measures on the ballot, 1) replacement of the levy that supports the General Fund and provides 23% of their operating funds was approved with 65% yes votes, and 2) a capital project bond issue to modernize a number of buildings that are in disrepair was approved with 63% yes votes. He expressed appreciation for the voters’ support. The District understands and is mindful of how precious public resources are and works hard to get value from every dollar in their projects. Council President Buckshnis relayed the Council discussed a diversity statement and forming a diversity committee. She noted the information sheet Dr. Brossoit provided had Spanish on one side and English on the other. Dr. Brossoit advised there are many families in the District that are not fluent in English and encounter barriers and challenges accessing the school system. Although society often talks about closing the achievement gap, there are financial poverty related challenges and language challenges for some homes. The community needs to maintain the positive momentum for students and families to be successful in the public school system and modify the system to help everyone be successful. Mayor Earling thanked Dr. Brossoit for the working relationship between the City and the ESD. He has had an opportunity to work on several projects, most recently the partnership between ESD, the City, Verdant and the State legislature on the former Woodway High School fields. Dr. Brossoit expressed his appreciation for the partnership with the City, commenting his interaction with Councilmembers during his 10 years as superintendent has always been very positive. He appreciated the way Mayor Earling looks at the big picture and what is in the best interest of the entire community. He commented it is easy to have a partnership when the partners are good people who work together. 6A. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SHANNON & WILSON FOR TASKS TO COMPLETE THE FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING/EDMONDS MARSH RESTORATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE A MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $22,600 FOR OPTIONAL TASKS A & B (Previously Item 14) Stormwater Engineering Program Manager Jerry Shuster explained the project was funded in part by the Salmon Recovery Funding (SRF) Board, Puget Sound Acquisition and Recovery Fund (PSAR). He displayed an aerial map of the project context, identifying Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek and the Willow Creek outfall. He relayed the overall project goals: • Daylight Willow Creek: o Restore tidal inflow into Edmonds Marsh to improve fish passage conditions – SRF Board Funding – Habitat Benefit o Reduce frequent flooding of adjacent properties – City of Edmonds funding – Hydrologic Benefit Keeley O’Connell, Senior Project Manager, EarthCorps, described the important of this project, what a unique opportunity it is and what a rare gem the marsh is. The Edmonds Marsh is the only intact and functional marsh habitat of its size remaining between Everett and Tacoma but it is inaccessible to salmon and has limits in its ability to function for birds. Historically tens of thousands of juvenile salmon would Packet Page 39 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 7 have entered Edmonds Marsh on a daily basis, foraging, rearing and growing, leaving to grow to full size and returning 3-5 years later for spawning. Today juvenile salmon of all species would use the marsh if they could access it, particularly Chinook salmon which are listed as threatened on the Endangered Species List. Fish from all major rivers in Puget Sound as well as the Frazier River in BC would utilize this system if they could access it. If the system were restored adult Coho could potential spawn in the lower regions of Willow Creek. Ms. O’Connell described the results of the early feasibility study completed in 2013: • Daylighting Willow Creek is feasible though Marina Beach Park and will provide improved access to estuarine marsh habitat suitable for juvenile Chinook salmon. • The project will likely reduce flood water surface elevations in the Marsh during large rain events. Goals of the project include: • Evaluate marsh outlet configuration(s) through Marina Beach Park that would allow for juvenile fish access to the marsh during the spring and summer nearshore rearing period • Evaluate the need for structural measures in the proposed channel to: o Improve fish passage conditions o Protect property and local infrastructure from channel migration • Determine the need for a self-regulating tide gate in the proposed channel to protect from coastal flooding sources • Work with the stakeholders in the area to maximize aquatic habitat: o Port of Edmonds o WSDOT including Ferries Division o Unocal/Chevron o BNSF Railway Mr. Shuster identified the consultant team: • Shannon & Wilson, Inc. – Prime – Project Management, Civil Engineering, geotechnical and environmental support. • Subconsultants: o Anchor QEA, LLC, - Hydrodynamic/costal modeling o Confluence Environmental - Fisheries expert o Leidos Engineering, LLC - Hydrologic modeling o Cultural Resource Consultants – Cultural and Historic Resource reviews o DHA, Inc. -Surveyors Mr. Shuster reviewed project funding: • RCO Grant – approved by Council on February 18, 2014 - $200,000. • Stormwater Utility Fund - o Consultant - $137,060 including the $22,600 in management reserve for optional tasks. o Approx. $8,000 in City Staff time to manage project. • Spending Authority in 2014 budget - $500,000 Council President Buckshnis advised the recommendation was to include Options A and B. She expressed support for the final feasibility study. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SHANNON & WILSON FOR TASKS TO COMPLETE THE FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING/EDMONDS MARSH Packet Page 40 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 8 RESTORATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE A MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $22,600 FOR OPTIONAL TASKS A & B. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. EDMONDS ARTS COMMISSION 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Arts & Culture Program Manager Frances Chapin introduced Art Commission Chair Suzy Maloney who introduced Vice Chair Samantha Saether who presented the report. She explained the Edmonds Arts Commission (EAC) is comprised of seven volunteer members who work with the Cultural Services division on various projects. She recognized Art Commissioners in the audience. The commission has existed since 1975 with the ongoing mission to promote the arts as a part of the central identity of Edmonds and as an integral part of the quality of life and economy of the city. She highlighted 2013 projects: • 28th annual Write on the Sound writers’ conference o Draws attendees from throughout the country o Sold out with 275 participants o Generated over 70 hotel night stays • Tourism Promotion Awards to community art and cultural organizations o Awarded $9,800 from the lodging tax fund • Visual and Literary Arts o Free summer concerts in the park o New series at Hazel Miller Plaza with grant from Hazel Miller Foundation • Public Art o Rotating exhibits of visual arts in the Edmonds Library and Frances Anderson Center o Completed SR-99 enhancement project that included artist-made lanterns o Facilitated selection process for Five Corners roundabout artwork o Oversee acquisition and upkeep of publicly owned artwork  Over 100 original pieces with 30 permanent sited o Curate Hekinan collection  Selections currently on display in the library and Frances Anderson Center o Installed more art enhanced flower poles  Partially funded by donations and intended as opportunity for commemoration • Arts Education o Co-sponsored literary master class for high school and running start students with keynote presenter from Write on the Sound o Annually host a Best Book Poster Contest for third grade students • Chamber Arts Awards o 2014 Arts Award Ceremony will be held March 20 at the end of the 3rd Thursday Art Walk at the Edmonds Conference Center • Edmonds Arts Summit o Funded via an array of community sponsors o Keynote speaker Randy Cohen, Americans for the Arts o Initiated by Mayor Earling, brought together over 220 participants • Participated in update of the Community Cultural Plan o Arts Summit was first step in the public involvement process integral to updating the plan o Public process spanned 9 months o Included extensive public participation o 22 community members helped lead the update Ms. Saether thanked the Council and the Edmonds community for their continued support of arts and culture, a key component of the economic vitality and identity of Edmonds. Packet Page 41 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 9 8. SENIOR CENTER STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS AND PROPOSED RESOLUTION Council President Buckshnis explained the resolution is the final step of a two-step process that Mr. Fleming and Mr. Lovell began with a presentation to the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee last Tuesday and a detailed presentation and lengthy Q&A at the Council retreat. She read the resolution into the record: RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER FOR ITS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS Whereas, the City of Edmonds Resolution No. 342 was passed by City Council in October 21, 1975 resolving and declaring the Senior Center at 220 Railroad Avenue to be the permanent Edmonds Senior Citizen Center facility; Whereas, the Strategic Action Plan for the City of Edmonds adopted by the City Council on April 2, 2013 specifically ranks in Quality of Life Item 3.a.1 that the City should work “towards develop(ing) a long term solution for maintaining and updating the Edmonds Senior Center” as VERY HIGH; Whereas, the City of Edmonds Resolution No. 943 passed by the City Council on January 5, 1999 declares and resolves that the City Council supports the demolition of the existing structure and construction of a new Edmonds Senior Center at its current waterfront location towards meeting projected facility and program needs in the future; Whereas on October 16, 2013 , the Board of Directors of the Edmonds Senior Center directed its Strategic Action Group to focus on the long - term viability of the current structure and/or replacement at its current location; Whereas, The Board of Directors, the Executive Director and Staff of the Edmonds Senior Center have invested hundreds of thousands of hours and public government grant moneys and private contributions to continue Edmonds Senior Center services and programs to assist in the facilitation of thousands of citizens that utilize the Edmonds Senior Center every day; Whereas, hundreds of volunteers have donated thousands of precious hours providing services at the current site of the Edmonds Senior Center to senior citizens living in Edmonds and in south Snohomish County; Whereas, the programs and services donated to the City of Edmonds and to local residents by the Edmonds Senior Center have greatly benefitted the community and the city of Edmonds; Whereas, each year the Edmonds Senior Center Staff and Volunteers raises more than 70% of its annual budget; Whereas, the partnership between the Edmonds Senior Center and the City of Edmonds has been a great benefit to the taxpayers of the City of Edmonds; Whereas, the income from the Edmonds Senior Center thrift store and facility rentals have allowed the Edmonds Senior Center to provide these services to residents of Edmonds; Whereas, the Edmonds Senior Center should remain in its current location as stated in the City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan approved by the City Council on February 25, 2014 and the City Council should acknowledge this important resource center. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1) The City Council would like to reaffirm the intent of resolution No. 342 placing the Edmonds Senior Center as a permanent facility at 220 Railroad Avenue, Edmonds WA 98020, 2) The City Council would like to reaffirm the intent of resolution No. 943 which supports the demolition of the current Edmonds Senior Center and construction of a new Edmonds Senior Center at current location. 3) The City Council recognizes that the Edmonds Senior Center is an important Edmonds institution contributing needed services and programs to residents of Edmonds and to south Snohomish County; Packet Page 42 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 10 4) The City Council and the Mayor hereby agree that the Board of Directors of the Edmonds Senior Center and all of the volunteers and members of the Edmonds Senior Center are to be commended for their efforts to date to seek to construct a new Edmonds Senior Center on its current waterfront site and are to be encouraged in continuing those efforts which could include many aspects from a feasibility study to fundraising efforts; COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Council President Buckshnis explained Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and she used to be on the Senior Center Board; she is still on the Board, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ term expired last year. She asked whether she should recuse herself from the vote as Mr. Wambolt suggested. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained State law refers to beneficial interest in contracts and requires Councilmembers to recuse themselves from that type of vote. He did not sense there was any contract from which Council President Buckshnis would profit. He was not aware of anything in State law that would prevent her from voting but reasonable minds can differ with regard to perception. In some instances Councilmembers voluntarily recuse themselves even if the law does not require it. He encouraged the Council to formulate an ethics policy that outlined the expectation for voting on such matters. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINED. 9. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OF FILE # PLN20130074 AND THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A PROPOSAL TO REZONE ONE PARCEL (7533 228TH ST. SW) FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY (RM-2.4) TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY (RM-1.5) Mayor Earling explained the purpose of the closed record hearing was for the City Council to consider the Planning Board’s recommendation that property located at 7533 228th Street Southwest be rezoned from Residential Multifamily RM2.4 to Residential Multifamily RM 1.5. A rezone is a Type IV-B application where staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Board and the Planning Board forwards a recommendation to the City Council for final action. Mayor Earling opened the closed record public hearing and described the procedures. The City Clerk will make a recording of the proceedings. There will be no opportunity during the closed record hearing for public testimony. The parties of record would normally include the applicant and any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the application and any person who individually submitted written comments concerning the application at the open record public hearing. In this case there was no testimony other than the presentation by staff and no written comments were received. Therefore staff will be the only presenter. Mayor Earling explained the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine requires the hearing be fair in form, substance and appearance. The hearing must not only be fair, it must also appear to be fair. He asked whether any member of the decision-making body has engaged in communication with opponents or proponents regarding the issues in this matter outside the public hearing process. Councilmembers Fraley- Monillas, Peterson, Petso, Johnson, Bloom and Mesaros, Council President Buckshnis and Mayor Earling stated they had not had any communication outside the public hearing process. Mayor Earling asked if any member of the Council had a conflict of interest or believed he/she could not consider and hear the application in a fair and objective manner. Council President Buckshnis, Councilmembers Mesaros, Bloom, Johnson, Petso, Peterson and Fraley-Monillas, and Mayor Earling stated they had no conflicts. Mayor Earling asked whether any audience member objected to his or any Councilmembers’ participation. There were no objections voiced. Mayor Earling advised only staff will Packet Page 43 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 11 be presenting and staff will be allowed 5 minutes for their presentation. Council agreed with this procedure. Planner Mike Clugston displayed Attachment 2 to Exhibit 2, an aerial photograph of the site and identified the site, just east of Hwy 99, south of the Ranch Market in a transitional area of retail and apartment uses to the west and north and residential to the south and east. In order to approve a rezone, ECDC Chapter 20.40 identified six factors for consideration: 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Clugston displayed Attachment 4 to Exhibit 2, a Comprehensive Plan map for the area with this parcel highlighted. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the parcel is Corridor Development within the Highway 99 Corridor and Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center. Compatible zoning classifications for this designation include General Commercial and appropriate transitional zones including RM-2.4 and RM-1.5. The Planning Board found the proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan since the RM-1.5 zoning classification is one of the possible implementing zone for the Highway 99 Corridor 2. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. Mr. Clugston displayed Attachment 3, the current Zoning Map with the parcel highlighted. The subject parcel was annexed on July 26, 1961 and zoned R6-A by the City at that time. The site was redeveloped with the 8-unit building that exists on the site in early 1964 under that zoning. The City subsequently rezoned the site RML later in 1964 when new multifamily zone designations were created. When the City implemented the current multifamily zones in 1980, the site was rezoned to RM-2.4. This designation made the site non-conforming with regard to the number of dwelling units, only 7 were allowed on the site under RM-2.4. Rezoning the parcel from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5 would bring the existing 8 units back into conformance with density. It would also allow for the possible creation of up to three additional dwelling units. While three additional units would be possible, the applicant’s intent at this time is to create one additional dwelling unit within the existing accessory structure on the site that was approved in 1966. The Planning Board determined rezoning the parcel to RM-1.5 is consistent with the zoning ordinance and zone district. The existing nonconforming density on the site would become conforming by the change and allow the applicant to establish an additional dwelling unit in the existing accessory structure on the site. 3. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property. Mr. Clugston referred to the Zoning Map, explaining rezoning the subject parcel from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5 would result in little external change from existing conditions given the applicant’s desire to create living space in the existing accessory structure on the site. The parcel to the west is zoned RM-2.4 but the existing structure has been used for offices under a conditional use permit since 1974. The parcel immediately to the east and south of 228th has been zoned and developed single family residential since the area was annexed in 1961. The Planning Board found the proposed rezone is appropriate in relation to the transitional nature of the surrounding area and that little external impact would result from the proposed zoning change. 4. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone. Mr. Clugston explained the transitional character of the immediate and surrounding area has remained largely unchanged for many years with the exception of the parcel immediately to the north of the subject site. That parcel had been zoned Business Commercial for many years but was downzoned in 1995 to RM-1.5 to allow for the development of the low-income senior apartment complex that was built there in 2006. The proposed rezone would Packet Page 44 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 12 also assist in fulfilling the City’s goal of providing housing for new population growth under the GMA. The Planning Board found there has been sufficient change in the immediate vicinity and City policy to justify the rezone. 5. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. Mr. Clugston explained while the parcel is suitable for development at RM-2.4 or RM-1.5, densities and uses allowed in the zone and development standards are identical. The site is currently served by all utilities and has good access including transportation options such as a Community Transit stop adjacent to the site on 228th and the Interurban Trail to the east. There are currently 16 on-site parking stalls. The 8 existing 2- bedroom units require 14 stalls. Adding 1 additional 1-bedroom unit in the existing accessory structure on the site would require an additional 1.5 stalls or a total of 15.5 stalls. A building permit would be required to transform the accessory structure into livable space. The accessory structure received a building permit in 1966; the structure is now non-conforming with regard to setbacks and can only be remodeled in conformance with the City’s non-conforming code. The Planning Board determined the site is suitable for the project as envisioned by the applicant. Should the site be completely redeveloped in the future, the project would be required to meet all codes in effect at that time for setbacks, height, parking, landscaping, etc. 6. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Mr. Clugston explained the applicant would realize increased value as the existing density would no longer be considered nonconforming. A small amount of additional income would likely result from an additional dwelling units as well as a small increase in tax valuation. If the property were redeveloped more fully with another RM use such as offices or daycare, additional value would likely accrue to the owner and the taxing districts. There does not appear to be much gain otherwise to the public health, safety and welfare since utilities and similar improvements already serve the site. The Planning Board found there appears to only be a small gain to the applicant and to the public safety, health and welfare as current envisioned. A larger gain to the applicant would likely be realized if the site were completely redeveloped regardless of whether the site was zoned RM-1.5 or RM-2.4 Mr. Clugston summarized the Planning Board unanimously recommended approval of the rezone based on the Findings of Fact analysis included in the attachment to the February 4, 2014 staff report because the proposed change will bring the site into conformance with density while allowing the flexibility to establish an additional dwelling unit in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. If the Council upholds the Planning Board’s recommendation, the Council should direct the City Attorney to prepare the rezone ordinance. Councilmember Petso asked whether the purpose of the rezone was to allow the former laundry building to be occupied as a dwelling unit. Mr. Clugston agreed that is the applicant’s intent but that is not what the Council is approving; the Council is asked to approve a rezone. Councilmember Petso observed the former laundry building is nonconforming. Mr. Clugston answered yes, with respect to setbacks. Councilmember Petso asked if the existing occupied building was nonconforming with regard to setbacks. Mr. Clugston answered he believed it was conforming with regard to setbacks. Councilmember Petso observed the current use on the site was nonconforming. Mr. Clugston answered the current number of dwelling units was nonconforming but multifamily residential is an allowed use. Councilmember Petso relayed typically a nonconforming use was not allowed to expand. Mr. Clugston answered it would not be expanded; this request was to change the zoning to allow the additional 3 Packet Page 45 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 13 dwelling units and to bring the building that became nonconforming in 1980 back into conformance. Councilmember Petso asked whether the proposal needed to meet all the criteria Mr. Clugston reviewed or only some of them. Mr. Clugston answered it did not need to meet them all; the Planning Board found it met them all. Councilmember Petso asked whether this decision would set a precedent for other properties along the Highway 99 corridor or were the circumstances of this application sufficiently unique. Mr. Clugston answered the circumstances were unique; the fact that the building was constructed under one zone and a later zoning change made it nonconforming. The applicant’s request to rezone the site to a zone that is still recognized as implementing the Comprehensive Plan makes it a reasonable request. The development standards for RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 are exactly the same, the only difference is the number of dwelling units. Councilmember Petso asked whether the Council’s decision would set a precedent for other properties along Highway 99. Mr. Clugston answered no. Councilmember Bloom complimented Mr. Clugston on his report; she found it very easy to follow and comprehensive. She asked whether the adjacent property owners’ list is provided by the property owner. Mr. Clugston responded the applicant provides the list. Councilmember Bloom asked whether the City sends out the notices to surrounding property owners. Mr. Clugston answered yes. Mayor Earling remanded to Council for deliberation and action. Councilmember Petso commented she was uncomfortable with the proposal because it is immediately adjacent to a single family parcel and yet the request is to rezone it to maximum density multifamily. She preferred to retain the medium density multifamily to allow it to better serve as a transitional area which would be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance indicates a desire to provide for a range of densities; rezoning every parcel in Edmonds to the maximum density would not provide for a range of densities. She was inclined to retain the current zoning designation as transitional area immediately adjacent to single family seemed like a good parcel not to rezone to maximum density multifamily. She commented allowing a smaller number of units may result in larger units which would better accommodate families. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was comfortable with adding one more unit to the site. The site immediately to the north has approximately 60 units and the parcel to the southwest has approximately 100 units. Council President Buckshnis commented on the desire for consistency in zoning and she did not object to the proposed rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. Councilmember Bloom asked whether low income senior housing was constructed in 2006. Mr. Clugston agreed. Councilmember Bloom asked whether that was the current use of the property and whether there was any reason to expect that would change. Mr. Clugston agreed that was the current use of the property and he was not aware of any proposed change. Councilmember Bloom asked whether the additional unit would be low income senior housing. Mr. Clugston answered that was not in the record. The existing units are market rate; he assumed the new unit would also be market rate. Councilmember Bloom was comfortable with the rezone to RM-2.4; it would make the site conforming as well as allow one additional unit. The parking would still comply. Councilmember Petso clarified the rezone was not just allowing one more unit. If the owner decides to redevelop the site, 11 units could be allowed. She understood this was a unique case due to the nonconforming nature and she could understand the desire to rezone it just to make it conforming. She suggested this was a good example of a location where transitional zoning was appropriate. If the intent Packet Page 46 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 14 was to rezone everything to maximum density, she suggested the policy regarding providing a range of densities and providing transition be taken out of the zoning code. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO UPHOLD THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING BOARD AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR APPROVAL ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETSO VOTING NO. 10. PUBLIC HEARING AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON POTENTIAL SALE OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF 184TH STREET SW AND 80TH AVENUE W (TAX PARCEL #00370800101200) Senior Planner Kernen Lien displayed a location map, identifying the City’s Parcel and the Angler’s Crossing Plat/PRD. He explained for the past 17 years this property has been associated with the Angler’s Crossing Plat/PRD. Angler’s Crossing received preliminary approval in January 2007. While preliminary plat approvals are valid for a period of ten years, the PRD associated with the plat expired in January 2012 and essentially the plat cannot move forward without the PRD. The City has been approached regarding the potential sale of the property. The public hearing tonight is only regarding the potential sale of the City’s owned parcel. The City Council discussed the potential sale at the end of February. Public notices for the public hearing were mailed to property owners within 300 feet as well as to those on the parties of record list from Angler’s Crossing and the site was posted. Councilmember Petso asked whether this property could be used for infiltration or other stormwater purposes if the City retained ownership. Public Works Director Phil Williams responded this question arose several months ago and the consultant Rick Schaefer, Tetra Tech, who is studying the Perrinville Creek Basin was asked to opine on that subject. Little data was available at the beginning of the study; his initial response was yes, stormwater could be infiltrated on that property and he described various ways that could happen. Subsequent work on the Perrinville Creek study identified other parcels and staff indicated to Council that although stormwater could be infiltrated on that parcel, there was nothing so unique about it that other parcels could not be used for that purpose such as city-owned property across the street in the park that is larger, has better access and could accommodate a larger facility. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Gene Wisemiller, Edmonds, compared selling this property to selling an heirloom for cash, pointing out there is value in things beyond their monetary value. The cash from the sale will end up in the General Fund and disappear and the land, the trees and the habitat would be gone, replaced with houses. This is one of only a few opportunities to retain undeveloped land. He urged the Council not to sell the property. Dawna Lahti, Edmonds, described reveling in the shady curves where native trees grace both sides of the road while driving on Olympic View Drive toward Meadowdale. When walking on the trails, they are grateful for in-city wilderness; this natural area is roughly contiguous with that area. She commented on trees holding water to prevent floods, holding soil to prevent slides and vibrating to lessen noise pollution; decimation of wildlife corridors that results in the loss of entire species and the opportunity to preserve one of the last wild places in Edmonds. She urged the Council to retain this forest. Alan Mearns, Edmonds, distributed written materials. He urged the Council not to sell this property and to consider turning it into a City wildlife preserve for the benefit of all citizens. He described the decline in number and diversity of birds in his yard during the past 15 years as tall trees in the Maplewood area have been removed. He referred to the importance of the canopy connectivity; Southwest County Park is connected by a thin band of trees to 196th, allowing birds and wildlife to move between the three major parks. Removing the trees on this property will ruin that corridor. A comparison of 1990 and 2014 aerial Packet Page 47 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 15 photographs shows a 50% reducing in forest cover and trees. He urged the Council to think about the wildlife and instead of looking at location maps, to look at aerial photographs. He also encouraged the Council to visit the site before they voted. Brian Furby, Edmonds, requested the property not be sold and strongly advocated for combining this 0.6 acre with the remaining property to establish a city park. He commented, 1) this would connect Seaview Park with the Southwest County Park, 2) once the trees are removed they are gone, 3) the previous PRD required removing thousands of cubic yards of dirt, resulting in a great deal of truck traffic, 4) tree removal will result in numerous logging trucks, 5) once developed the area will have more impervious surfaces, 6) City has spent a great deal to address issues associated with Perrinville Creek and development will create more problems, and 7) it is critical the trees and habitat remain. Creating a park will retain badly needed urban forest, fit well with the recently approve PROS Plan and be a wonderful picnic area, nature center and hiking trails. He suggested the City seek grants to assist with funding acquisition of the properties. This would be a win for the neighborhood, the environment, the wildlife and future Edmonds residents. Suzie Schaefer, Edmonds, said she has also seen changes due to the loss of trees. Approximately four years ago a group of people started the Edmonds Wildlife Habitat Native Plant Demonstration Garden at the hatchery due to concern with the loss of wildlife, birds, insects and reptiles and a desire to make the community more wildlife friendly. They conduct workshops and many citizens volunteer at the garden. She questioned identifying this property as surplus, pointing out it is necessary as it is already wildlife friendly. Those involved in the demonstration garden would be happy to work with the City on natural ways to use this property. Rene VanLoveren, Edmonds, representing four property owners of Woods Creek Place tracts 999 and 100 on 76th Avenue West across from the Angler’s Crossing PRD. The 1.4 acre Tract 999 is a native growth protection area through which Perrinville Creek flows and each resident has an equal ¼ interest. Perrinville Creek is a salmon bearing stream and they have seen resident trout and other wildlife. When their properties were developed in 1992, the City required the builder to preserve Tract 999 as open space. The City should require this of its own properties and not sell it. One of their major concerns is the Angler’s Crossing PRD’s plan to pipe the runoff from the 27 homes under Olympic View Drive and into Perrinville Creek where it runs through their property. In addition to chemicals that cause environmental damage, current water flows are already too high, erosion has increased over the years and a typical rainfall causes the creek to overflow. They prefer the City retain ownership of the property which could reduce the number of homes built in the PRD, limit damage to the local environment as well as preserve the natural habitat and complement the existing park and trail system. Rebecca Wolfe, Edmonds, urged the Council not to sell the property, noting the Council is the trustee of the land but citizens own the property. She read from a book, “Natures Trust,” about the Public Trust Doctrine. She was thankful the marsh had not been designated surplus, noting the urban forest should not be considered surplus and should be considered a highly valuable part of protecting the environment, air, water, streams, wildlife and human health. She suggested consideration be given to purchasing the surrounding area for a park. Duane Farmen, Edmonds, commented by selling the property, the City loses the opportunity to purchase the adjacent land for a park, recreation and open space (PROS) project. The site has many large trees, steep slopes, two deep ravines, a wetland and is an important watershed of Perrinville Creek. Selling the property sets the stage for the adjoining property to be developed resulting in destruction of the Perrinville Creek watershed where the City plans to spend an $188,000 Department of Ecology grant and $200,000 in City funds on a watershed/stormwater study with the intent of reducing stormwater flows into Perrinville Creek. He urged the Council not to sell the property and do whatever was necessary to Packet Page 48 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 16 purchase the adjacent property to preserve the land for a future PROS project. He suggested financing the purchase of the property by, 1) setting aside other CIP projects to accumulate sufficient funds and seeking grant funds for those CIP projects, or 2) waiver of retroactivity with the State. He asked the Council to do what is right to protect this watershed and these woodlands for a future city park. William Lider, Lynnwood, spoke against the sale of the property to facilitate a private development project. As a professional civil engineer specializing in stormwater erosion issues, he represented local property owners adjacent to the creek and he has viewed the damage caused by thoughtless development. Perrinville Creek suffers frequent damaging flows from Lynnwood as well as toxic runoff from Lynnwood’s municipal golf course. Edmonds and Lynnwood’s failure to properly adopt more stringent stormwater design requirements has further damaged the creek. He commented on the high flow bypass Edmonds installed in Perrinville Creek in the 1990s and the recent rerouting of stormwater from Talbot Road five feet below Perrinville Creek. To correct past insults to Perrinville Creek, the City should discourage removal or clearing of any large tracts of negative vegetation in the lower reach of the basin. The City should also adopt the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Manual for Western Washington and amend the manual to incorporate low impact development. Bill Rankin, Edmonds, recognized people in the audience who opposed the sale of the property and urged the Council to vote no on the sale of the City-owned property. He suggested the reason this land had not previously been developed was previous stewards understood the ravine was one of the tributaries to Perrinville Creek, decision-makers knew it was wrong to allow deforestation, grading, surface changes to a natural watershed, or City government and land use experts understand this land can never be sustainably used in a resident development. Although some may think this is only the sale of the City- owned property, in reality it is about a 27-lot development and the domino effect it will have. He suggested consideration be given to a project that is beneficial to the community whether that is a new park, preservation district or restoration of the watershed and salmon habitat. He requested the Council do their part to represent the citizens and vote no on the sale of this property. Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the audience was not asked before the hearing began whether anyone opposed any Councilmember’s participation. He understood some Councilmembers live close to this property. He feared there could be a petition drive if the Council voted to sell the property and if the City continued selling property, there would be none left. Warren Hendersen, Edmonds, commented this property is heavily wooded even the area that has been approved for development. He urged the City to retain every opportunity to maintain the rural character and woodsy environment. The Council should not allow this valuable wildlife habitat and forested parcel to be sold. Shelli Morris, Edmonds, explained she was born and raised in Edmonds, moved away and then chose to return and purchase her parents’ home in Seaview. She urged the Council to visit the Seaview area, a beautiful neighborhood with a lot of trees, children and wildlife. She urged the Council not to sell the property, envisioning her daughter could purchase the house as an adult. McKenzie James, Edmonds, described seeing bats, coyotes and other wildlife in the area. One of the main reasons her family purchased their house was the forest across the street. If the property were developed, removing the trees would destroy the wildlife. The trees on the property are beautiful, tall and old and the property drops from the street into a ravine. She urged the Council to leave the property as a park and not to sell it. Erin Way, Edmonds, explained they purchased their home due to the blends of wood and homes and the feeling of an established neighborhood. The purchase was an investment in her future; her children love Packet Page 49 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 17 nature and visit Seaview Park daily. She was concerned with the ravine on the property, increased traffic from development, and the impact development would have on the neighborhood and wildlife. She relayed none of the five families in her child’s preschool class were pleased when they hear developing this property was an option. Although she was not anti-development, this was a poor choice for the wooded neighborhood. Tina Marone relayed seeing many trees around their house removed through development and the resulting changes in the neighborhood. She spoke in favor of preserving this property as a community park, commenting this would be a wonderful opportunity to teach children to be stewards of the environment and the fragile ecosystem. Anna Marone commented this forest is not just a piece of land, it is a home to many animals. Removing the forest would affect the animals. Eric Goodman, Edmonds, encouraged the Council not to sell the property. He purchased his home a year ago; he is an urban planner who wanted sidewalks and his wife is a botanist who wanted intact woods. He urged the Council to preserve the woods. Julie Cuhen, Edmonds, commented the Seaview neighborhood is an anomaly, a beautiful wooded area. Her children love going to Seaview Park and walking the wooded trails. Preserving this land is important for the neighborhood and for children who are embracing nature. She urged the Council not to sell the property. Cheryl Jones commented whatever money the City received for the sale of the property, will likely be spend on the drainage problem in the area. The City has been out numerous times in the last five years including when the road collapsed five years ago and required extensive work. She feared the sale of the property would result in more drainage issues. Dick Van Hollebeke, Edmonds, pointed out the Council was considering selling one piece of property, a heavily treed, steep ravine with rights-of-way for water, sewer and electricity that would never be developed. There have been two previously public hearings where at least 100 people testified largely about the same things. The people that own the property are in their 80s and have been trying to sell the property for a good portion of their lives. The property is for sale and the owners have the right to develop it in accordance with the RS-8 zoning in a way that would look identical to the rest of the neighborhood. The vacant lot the Council is considering selling would remain a vacant lot; it was added to the PRD because it added square footage and allowed lots to be shifted. The Council’s responsibility is to consider all citizens’ rights; the property owners of the adjacent property have a right to develop their property. Regardless of whether the Council sells the property, the configuration of that lot will not change. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if there was a wetland on the City-owned property. Mr. Lien answered there was a small wetland in the middle of the PRD; he did not know the exact location. Councilmember Petso relayed some possible ideas, 1) not sell the parcel yet, 2) complete the drainage study of the Perrinville Drainage Basin, 3) evaluate the value of the parcel for critical areas, steep slope or wetland, as a wildlife corridor and as a potential pedestrian corridor, 4) refer consideration of the 2012 Stormwater manual to the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee, and 5) commit to the idea of not actively considering the sale of the property again without public notice and a public hearing. She understood the concerns the public raised and recognized the adjacent parcels are owned by another Packet Page 50 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 18 property owner who may choose to build regardless of whether the City sells this property. She commented this property cannot be surplus if the City may want to use it to address drainage issues or to create a wildlife corridor. She was not inclined to vote to surplus the property tonight. The Council received a great deal of good information from citizens tonight on ways to move forward with investigating the value of the parcel to the City. Council President Buckshnis thanked everyone who has emailed and spoke at a Council meeting, noting she has never received this many emails about a topic. She agreed with Councilmember Petso that the property should not be surplused because it may be needed in the future. She supported moving forward pragmatically, the adjacent property is for sale but a new PRD would be required. She summarized the property is valuable to the drainage basin and wildlife. Councilmember Mesaros asked if there was anything to keep the current owner of the other parcels from moving forward with development and how many houses could be developed. Mr. Lien answered the property owners could apply for development on the remaining property. With regard to the number of units that could be developed on the remaining property, Angler’s Crossing was a 27-lot PRD. The remaining property is 4.69 acres; with the RS-8 zone, 25 lots could potentially be developed on the remaining property, not including the City’s parcel. City Attorney Jeff Taraday cautioned there is often a difference between the highest potential number of lots based on the acreage and what could actually be achieved on a site once the topography, roads, and other factors are taken into account. Councilmember Mesaros asked if there would be a 10 lot difference. Mr. Taraday answered that would be speculation. Mr. Lien answered a PRD can potentially have smaller lots and set aside portions of the property in open space which was proposed in Angler’s Crossing. There were certain restrictions in the contract rezone for the property that limits the amount of impervious surface to 21% coverage. He summarized a number of lots could be developed on the site. Councilmember Peterson commented the surrounding parcels are privately owned and can be developed. He was uncertain what that means to the City parcel that cannot be developed, whether there was a way the funds received from the sale could be dedicated to the study of Perrinville Creek to ensure that drainage study is better funded. If development occurred via a PRD application, there would be a public process. Whoever owns the lands would be able to develop it; the question is how the Council and the community can help guide that development to ensure it fits the sense of the neighborhood and address the environmental impacts of tree canopy, stormwater, etc. A development cannot be rejected simply because the neighbors do not like it. If the City owned all the property, it would be an easy decision not to sell it but the City owns only a small parcel. While this property could be used for stormwater infiltration, there are likely better properties for significant stormwater retention. Councilmember Peterson assured none of the Council takes this lightly, the reality is the Council’s decision will not stop a future development unless the City purchases all the property. That is a different decision and one that needs to be balanced with many issues such as other park acquisitions and general infrastructure issues. The other parcels can and probably will be developed. It is important to build sensibly to accommodate a growing population. Councilmember Bloom commented it is an easy decision to keep property that has other value to the City. Many of the issues Councilmember Peterson raised are appropriate to be considered in other venues such as the code rewrite. The only change created by the City not selling this property is the developer could not build two addition homes that were allowed with this property in the original, expired PRD. She received 26 emails, all opposed to the sale of this property, and 19 people spoke tonight opposed to the sale of this property. Other code related issues can be addressed in another venue; it is an easy decision not to sell the property to protect critical areas, open space and trees. Packet Page 51 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 19 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she visited the property and was not convinced it was worth it to the City to sell the property. She was contacted by members of the Washington Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club and the Watershed Alliance, all who raise various issues regarding the sale of the property. She referred to an earlier presentation tonight that the City was spending $200,000 on the marsh, this property was likely valued at approximately that amount. Everyone has relayed concrete concerns about the environment; Councilmembers never want to make a decision that harms the environment for the future. Councilmember Petso observed there were at least four Councilmembers willing to vote not to sell the property tonight. She preferred to continue studying a pedestrian or wildlife corridor, drainage, and financing acquisition instead of waiting until a development application is submitted. Continuing to study those issues would not only retain this parcel but set the City up for a possible future opportunity. Councilmember Johnson thanked everyone who emailed the Council and attended tonight’s meeting. The Council has heard their message. She did not feel it was in the public’s best interest to sell the parcel at this time. However, this is only a small parcel of land, not the entire tract of land the neighborhood cherishes. The City originally purchased the property in 1966 for sewer and stormwater drainage systems. Regardless of whether the City sells the property, it will not be developed. She cautioned the City does not control all the land and additional work such as was suggested by Councilmembers Petso and Peterson needs to be done. Councilmember Mesaros commented although the Council may take the courageous step not to sell the property, his biggest concern was this would not accomplish what the neighborhood wants. If the Council chose to sell the property, Councilmember Peterson asked whether a restriction could be placed on the property to require a higher level of stormwater retention or other higher standard if it was part of a larger plat or PRD. Mr. Taraday answered there were ways of doing that; the devil is in the details with regard to the conditions, enforcement mechanisms, etc. Councilmember Peterson commented if the Council can figure out a way to demand a higher level of service with regard to stormwater, tree retention, etc., the Council and community can have a greater say in the quality of the development and its impact on the neighborhood. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, NOT TO SELL THE PROPERTY. Councilmember Peterson commented he will vote in favor of the motion. He wanted to continue the discussion with the City Attorney and staff regarding ways to better control any development that will more than likely happen on the other property. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 11. 76TH AVE. W AT 212TH ST. SW INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT UPDATE COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss provided an introduction to the project: Packet Page 52 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 20 • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Federal grant secured in ‘12 to complete Design & ROW phases • Design phase started in Summer ’12 • Project initially started as intersection only improvements; corridor improvements later incorporated • Grant application to be submitted this spring for construction funding He displayed an aerial photograph and described the project scope: • Addition of LT lane for northbound (NB) & southbound (SB) movements (on 76th) • Allow traffic signal to time both approaches concurrently (same as ex. conditions on 212th) • Addition of RT lane for WB, NB, and SB movements • Improve intersection delay o Ex. LOS F o W/ improvements: LOS C (meet City’s LOS standards / LOS D) o Projected 2030 LOS w/ improvements: LOS D • Addition of bike lanes (for all movements) • Increase sidewalk width • Utility improvements (water, sewer, storm) • Underground conversion of ex. overhead utility lines • NB & SB lane conversion at 76th @ 212th intersection o From 2-through lanes to 1-through lane o Match future 3-lane corridor on:  76th from 220th St. SW to 196th St. SW  212th from 76th to either 72nd or Hwy. 99 • Supports Complete Streets & 2009 Transportation Plan Kirk Harris, David Evans and Associates, reviewed the alternatives analysis: • Alternative 1: o From 196th / SR-524 to 76th @ 212th intersection  Same layout as existing  One through lane w/ parking stall for both NB and SB o 5-lane section at 76th @ 212th intersection  One through lane + one LT lane + one RT lane for both NB & SB  Ex. conditions: two through lanes for both NB & SB o From 76th @ 212th intersection to 220th  Same layout as existing  Two through lanes for both NB and SB • Alternative 2: o 3-lane section from 220th to 196th  One through lane for NB movement (w/ bike lane)  One through lane for SB movement (w/ bike lane)  One Two-Way-Left-Turn lane (TWLTL) o 3-lane section w/ bike lane + right turn lane for each leg of 76th @ 212th intersection He displayed a photograph of a similar 4-lane roadway to illustrate striping of the 3-lane section from 220th to 196th. He reviewed a comparison of the alternatives: Improvements 3-lane Corridor Configuration Existing. Corridor w/5 lane Section at 76th @ 212th only Addition of Bike Lanes X Pedestrian/Vehicle separation X (w/bike lanes) Packet Page 53 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 21 Support Complete Streets X Separation of left-turn traffic from through traffic X Congestion and sight distance improvements/collision reduction X Slower, safer corridor speeds, more consistent pace X Projected travel time on 76th between 196th and 220th (southbound movement in 2030) 333 seconds 427 seconds Projected travel time on 76th between 200th and 196th (northbound movement in 2030) 450 seconds 533 seconds Mr. Harris displayed a drawing of the existing section (76th from 220th to 208th and 212th from 76th to Hwy 99) and a drawing of the striping-only section. He summarized their analysis: • 3-lane configuration is the best alternative along 76th • Similar configuration would take place along 212th from 76th Ave. W to either Hwy 99 or 72nd Ave. W o 3-lane configuration already in place from Five Corners to 76th @ 212th intersection Mr. Hauss reviewed the remaining schedule: • Design phase - complete in December ‘15 • ROW phase - complete in December ‘15 • Construction phase - TBD (grant application to be submitted Spring ‘14) Next steps include: • Public Open House (Spring ‘14) • Meetings w/ property owners (involved in ROW acquisition) • Apply for Federal grant to fund Construction (Spring ‘14) • Amend 6-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add striping changes on 76th and 212th Councilmember Bloom observed in the north portion, 76th Avenue is the boundary between Lynnwood and Edmonds and asked whether improvements would be done on both sides and whether Lynnwood would pay for the improvements on their side. PW Director Phil Williams answered staff has briefly talked with Lynnwood; there will be further discussions as design progresses. He anticipated Edmonds would sponsor the project and Edmonds and Lynnwood would co-sponsor a grant. He pointed out one downside to the project is restriping in the north end of the project to reduce the 4-lane roadway to 3-lanes with bike lanes will eliminate parking stalls on both Edmonds’ and Lynnwood’s sides. His observation when walking and driving in that area is the parking is not heavily used. Councilmember Bloom asked how Lynnwood would be included in the public process. Mr. Williams answered Lynnwood staff and property owners on the street would be invited to meetings. Councilmember Johnson was excited about the project. She liked the Complete Streets component and looked forward to seeing greater detail. She was particularly interested in connections along 212th and along 76th to Five Corners. She observed the project will cause a slight delay but result in better safety and roadway function. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented vehicles line up on 76th during pickup times at the elementary school in that area. Mr. Williams answered the staff will work with the school to address that issue. Mr. Harris commented there is a similar issue with vehicles queuing southbound at the high school entrance at 76th & 212th; Mr. Hauss has been working with the school district to determine if there is better internal circulation to prevent traffic backing up into the intersection. Packet Page 54 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 22 12. 76TH AVENUE PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Public Works Director advised the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee requested a presentation on the closeout of these two projects. He explained this was a joint project with Lynnwood. Lynnwood encountered issues with their contractor and ultimately terminated the contract. During the period of time the future of the project was unknown, Edmonds took some interim steps including completing the waterline portion of the project and having a temporary treatment applied to the roads to over-winter the project with the expectation of a final road treatment this summer. The contracts with Earthworks for the waterline installation and with Lakeside for the paving have been completed and were approved on tonight’s Consent Agenda. He reviewed the overall project budget: 76th Avenue Waterline 76th Avenue Budget $765,786.15 Lynnwood Cost to Date 275,940.98 Lynnwood Cost Pending Allowance 30,000.00 Constr. Admin. Expended to Date (approx.) 21,000.00 Emergency Work Earthworks Enterprises, Inc. 362,320.17 HWA 15,587.00 Construction Inspection/Admin 30,000.00 Unexpected Conditions 30,920.00 Total $765,768.15 He reviewed the construction contract: Water Fund 421 City of Lynnwood Earthworks Enterprises – Waterline Replacement Construction Contract $362,320 Change Order 1 $26,595 Change Order 2 ($37,110) Total $325,210 $26,595 Lakeside Industries – Temporary Overlay Construction Contract $100,280 Change Order 1 $4,789 Change Order 2 ($1,598) Total $103,471 Councilmember Petso asked whether the above construction contract was only through the temporary paving job. Mr. Williams agreed. Councilmember Petso observed there was more work to be done on the permanent surface. Mr. Williams explained Lynnwood will do the design and manage the permanent paving; the overlay was always part of their project. Lynnwood will remove some of the temporary paving and apply a new street surface this summer. Councilmember Petso relayed several citizens’ gratitude for the solution to the road condition. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 13. REVIEW CURRENT SIGN CODE FOR POTENTIAL AMENDMENT AND/OR ENFORCEMENT OPTIONS Packet Page 55 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 23 Acting Development Services Director Rob Chave advised the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee requested this be presented to the full Council. Comments have been made during Audience Comments about revisions to correct possible deficiencies in the sign code. Staff is also interested in reviewing the sign code. He asked whether the Council wanted to add this to the joint meeting with the Planning Board that was scheduled during the Council retreated. He emailed Planning Board Members about their availability for a March 25 work session with the Council; at least two of the seven members are not available. Another option would be to schedule a joint work session on another date. Council President Buckshnis suggested a work session next week may not work because the agenda includes public comment on the Sunset Avenue walkway. She suggested rescheduling a joint work session in April or simply referring this to the Planning Board without a work session. Councilmember Peterson preferred to have a work session with the Planning Board. He suggested the packet include more than just the comments from one citizen. Mr. Chave explained there is much room for confusion in the current sign code. He recalled the Council’s discussion at the retreat that the Planning Board has the ability to do significant outreach before they begin revising the code. It was agreed to add this to a joint work session with the Planning Board in April. 15. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF MARCH 11, 2014 Finance Committee Councilmember Petso encouraged Councilmembers to review the budget amendment that will be scheduled on an upcoming agenda because in addition to carryover items or items previously approved by Council, there are several new items. Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee Councilmember Bloom reported most of the items the committee discussed were on the Consent Agenda or the agenda. She highlighted the continued discussion on potential changes to the MP2 Zone affecting the former Unocal lower yard. She explained Tim Smith, representing DOT/Washington State Ferries relayed DOT executives’ determination that they would not object to removing residential uses from the MP2 zone. Mr. Smith also stated commercial uses were a necessary part of the project, and that the State Legislature had insisted DOT configure projects to help support ongoing maintenance – commercial uses would specifically help support maintenance and operation of the Edmonds Crossing terminal, and were therefore a necessary component of the project. Councilmember Bloom advised further discussion regarding the MP2 zone will be presented to the full Council. Public Safety & Personnel Committee Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported on items discussed by the committee: • Renewal of Contract with Adix Bed and Bath for Dogs and Cats for Kenneling Services: approved on Consent Agenda • Review draft language for recreational marijuana licensing ordinance: forwarded to full Council • Office Coordinator (SEIU Union) Job Description/Position – Wastewater Treatment Plant: approved on Consent Agenda • Update of Edmonds City Code 10.25.090 (regarding probationary periods for promoted or transferred classified personnel): approved on Consent Agenda 16. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. Packet Page 56 of 182 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 18, 2014 Page 24 Mayor Earling thanked the Council for the retreat, noting some good work was accomplished and there was a lot of work to be done. 17. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Buckshnis welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. She thanked Councilmembers for a great job at the retreat. Councilmember Mesaros said it was nice to be on the Council. Councilmember Bloom welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. Councilmember Johnson announced the Chamber Art Awards on Thursday after the Ark Walk. Councilmember Petso welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. Councilmember Peterson welcomed Councilmember Mesaros. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the blue and yellow ribbon she was wearing in honor of World Down Syndrome Day, March 21. She explained World Down Syndrome Day is celebrated annually on March 21. The date is symbolic of the three copies of the 21st chromosome that characterizes people with Down Syndrome. Down Syndrome occurs in 1 out of every 691 lives births which equates to 57 people living in Edmonds who may have Down Syndrome. It is the most frequently occurring chromosomal difference; it affects people of all ages, races and economic levels, usually results in mild to moderate cognitive delays and does not affect an individual’s ability to lead a full and productive life. She thanked the Down Syndrome Association of Snohomish County for promoting inclusion and acceptance to all people with Down Syndrome. 18. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 19. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 20. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:41 p.m. Packet Page 57 of 182 AM-6707 4. C. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Nori Jacobson Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #207610 through #207759 dated March 20, 2014 for $450,648.68. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #60860 through #60875 for $454,471.94, benefit checks #60876 through #60882 and wire payments of $201,383.27 for the period March 1, 2014 through March 15, 2014. Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2014 Revenue: Expenditure:1,106,503.89 Fiscal Impact: Claims $450,648.68 Payroll Employee checks and direct deposit $454,471.94 Payroll Benefit checks and wire payments $201,383.27 Total Payroll $655,855.21 Attachments Claim checks 03-20-14 Project Numbers 03-20-14 Payroll Summary 03-20-14 Packet Page 58 of 182 Payroll Benefit 03-20-14 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 03/20/2014 10:11 AM City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 11:21 AM Mayor Dave Earling 03/20/2014 01:48 PM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 02:55 PM Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 03/20/2014 08:51 AM Final Approval Date: 03/20/2014 Packet Page 59 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207610 3/19/2014 074651 SNO CO CLERKS OFFICE E1AA.Lakeshore.2 E1AA.LAKESHORE CASE #13-2-07398-4 REMAI E1AA.LAKESHORE CASE #13-2-07398-4 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 30,437.58 Total :30,437.58 207611 3/20/2014 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 031214 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 1,207.44 Total :1,207.44 207612 3/20/2014 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 314165 WINTER WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS WINTER WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 82.46 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 7.83 WINTER COED VOLLEYBALL AND 3 ON 3314184 WINTER COED VOLLEYBALL AND 3 ON 3 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 162.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 15.47 Total :268.56 207613 3/20/2014 000195 ACCENT DESIGN 102032014 City Hall - Mini Blinds City Hall - Mini Blinds 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 310.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.48 Total :339.76 207614 3/20/2014 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000009544 Traffic - Signal balls Traffic - Signal balls 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 329.25 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 31.28 Traffic - Signal Balls0000009574 1Page: Packet Page 60 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207614 3/20/2014 (Continued)063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS Traffic - Signal Balls 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 856.76 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 81.39 Total :1,298.68 207615 3/20/2014 074789 AKELIPA, LISA JUROR25 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207616 3/20/2014 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 115730-13113 MEMBERSHIP FOR SHANE HOPE 2014 Membership for Shane Hope 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 720.00 Total :720.00 207617 3/20/2014 074785 ANNIS, JANET JUROR21 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207618 3/20/2014 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987315601 PARKS MAINT WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 53.07 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.04 Total :58.11 207619 3/20/2014 074778 AYE, DAVID JUROR14 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207620 3/20/2014 074769 BALLINGER, ANTHONY JUROR5 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 2Page: Packet Page 61 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :15.602076203/20/2014 074769 074769 BALLINGER, ANTHONY 207621 3/20/2014 074815 BERESFORD BOOTH PLLC 11743-01M BID FORMATION FEE 501C3 Edmonds BID formation fee of 501c3 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total :50.00 207622 3/20/2014 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 0757412-IN Fleet Auto Propane Inventory -634 Gal Fleet Auto Propane Inventory -634 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,063.48 Fleet Auto Propane Inventory - 500 Gal0758354-IN Fleet Auto Propane Inventory - 500 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 840.50 Total :1,903.98 207623 3/20/2014 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 48184 INV#48184 - EDMONDS PD - MILLS UNDER ARMOR BOOTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 174.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.62 INV#50108 - EDMONDS PD - COLLINS, AJ50108 ATAC BLACK BOOTS 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 85.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 8.08 INV#50245 - EDMONDS PD - TIE BARS50245 SILVER POLICE TIE BARS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 107.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.23 INV#55658 - EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN55658 UNIFORM PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 108.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.26 INV#57657 - EDMONDS PD - INVENTORY57657 3Page: Packet Page 62 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207623 3/20/2014 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP FLASHLIGHT RINGS/BW 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 31.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 2.99 Total :555.37 207624 3/20/2014 065739 BOBBY WOLFORD TRUCKING &060448 Storm - Recycle Concrete Storm - Recycle Concrete 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 100.00 Storm - Recycle Concrete060489 Storm - Recycle Concrete 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 855.00 Total :955.00 207625 3/20/2014 074229 BONNIE AUBUCHON AUBUCHON 18013 JEWELRY 18013 JEWELRY 18013 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 112.20 Total :112.20 207626 3/20/2014 074765 BRUMMOND, JUDITH JUROR1 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207627 3/20/2014 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE JUROR12 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207628 3/20/2014 074767 BURNS, JOAN JUROR3 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207629 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13623610 INV#13623610 CUST#572105 - EDMONDS PD BW COPY CHGS 1/31 - 2/28/14 4Page: Packet Page 63 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207629 3/20/2014 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 105.85 COLOR COPY CHGS 1/31 - 2/28/14 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 119.47 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAL (4) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 581.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 76.66 Total :883.58 207630 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13626538 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 001-0572105-004 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 249.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 23.75 Total :273.74 207631 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13623607 CANON CONTACT CHARGES C1030 Canon copier charges C1030 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 9.33 Canon copier charges C1030 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 9.33 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.88 Canon copier charges C1030 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 9.33 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.89 Total :30.65 207632 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13623614 Contract charge for Planning's IRC1030 Contract charge for Planning's IRC1030 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 33.02 9.5% Sales Tax 5Page: Packet Page 64 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207632 3/20/2014 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 3.14 Total :36.16 207633 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13623612 PARKS AND REC IRC5051 PARKS AND REC IRC5051 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 249.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 23.75 PARKS AND REC IRC1030IF13623616 PARKS AND REC IRC1030IF 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 27.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 2.66 Total :304.39 207634 3/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 13623606 Lease Council Office copier/printer Lease Council Office copier/printer 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 30.65 Total :30.65 207635 3/20/2014 063908 CELEBRATIONS CATERING SERVICE 10268 Lunches for Councilmembers and staff Lunches for Councilmembers and staff 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 231.05 Total :231.05 207636 3/20/2014 068484 CEMEX LLC 9428012116 Strom - Dirt Dump Fees Strom - Dirt Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 505.86 Storm - Dirt Dump Fees9428038885 Storm - Dirt Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 548.08 Total :1,053.94 207637 3/20/2014 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 204582 GLASSES, SCRIBE GLASSES, SCRIBE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 44.64 6Page: Packet Page 65 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207637 3/20/2014 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.23 Total :48.87 207638 3/20/2014 074807 CG ENGINEERING PLLC Ref000262366 LI Refund Cst #00006432 LI Refund Cst #00006432 001.000.257.310 75.00 Total :75.00 207639 3/20/2014 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 451302-1401 E4FA.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 2014 E4FA.Services thru January 2014 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 598.50 Total :598.50 207640 3/20/2014 074355 CITY OF MONROE POLICE DEPT MPD2014-001 REIMBURSE MONROE TACTICAL MEDICINE COURS TUITION FOR TACTICAL MEDICINE COURSE 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 2,990.00 AIRFARE FOR TACTICAL MEDICINE COURSE - 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 268.00 AIRLINE BAGGAGE FEE - TACTICAL MEDICINE 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 75.00 RENTAL CAR - TWO WEEK TACTICAL MEDICINE 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 506.40 PER DIEM AT GSA RATES - TWO WEEK 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 923.00 LODGING - TWO WEEK TACTICAL MEDICINE 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,104.48 FUEL FOR RENTAL CAR 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 40.50 Total :5,907.38 207641 3/20/2014 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 45909 CODE UPDATES City Code updates 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 3,401.50 9.5% Sales Tax 7Page: Packet Page 66 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207641 3/20/2014 (Continued)064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 323.14 Total :3,724.64 207642 3/20/2014 073387 COLELLA, CAROL COLELLA 03182014 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDAT 8.5 HOURS VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDAT 8.5 HOURS 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 85.00 Total :85.00 207643 3/20/2014 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 341081 E1AA.SERVICES THRU 2/1/14 E1AA.Services thru 2/1/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 20,205.18 Total :20,205.18 207644 3/20/2014 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 2/27/14 - 3/19/14 STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL State Share of Concealed Pistol 001.000.237.190 396.00 Total :396.00 207645 3/20/2014 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2014020082 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for February 2014 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 940.00 Total :940.00 207646 3/20/2014 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 14-3436 MINUTE TAKING 3/11 Fin. Comm. 3/11 Council min. 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 171.60 Total :171.60 207647 3/20/2014 074786 DOWLING, MARY JUROR22 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207648 3/20/2014 007253 DUNN LUMBER 2380051 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 288.78 8Page: Packet Page 67 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207648 3/20/2014 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 27.43 Total :316.21 207649 3/20/2014 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 14-02653 Water Quality - Water Samples Water Quality - Water Samples 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,068.00 Total :1,068.00 207650 3/20/2014 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 31555 Museum - Parts Museum - Parts 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.99 City Hall - Plastic Polish32769 City Hall - Plastic Polish 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.14 Total :36.09 207651 3/20/2014 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 32584 TAPERED BEARING TAPERED BEARING 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.75 ATLAS THERMAL32586 ATLAS THERMAL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.19 BEARING32642 BEARING 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34.00 9.5% Sales Tax 9Page: Packet Page 68 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207651 3/20/2014 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.23 FILTERS32698 FILTERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 53.76 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.11 Total :118.46 207652 3/20/2014 067703 EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE SEA 0118 ADULT VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE GYM RENTAL ADULT VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE GYM RENTAL 001.000.64.575.52.45.00 4,440.00 Total :4,440.00 207653 3/20/2014 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP CORDOVA 17999 CORDOVA 17999 SOCCER CORDOVA 17999 SOCCER 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 61.00 Total :61.00 207654 3/20/2014 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N / ME PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,735.90 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N / ME6-02736 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.65 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 76-02737 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,165.77 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250 5TH6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 198.86 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 7096-02825 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,282.78 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN ST6-02875 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN 10Page: Packet Page 69 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207654 3/20/2014 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 25.63 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME6-02925 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,459.25 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE6-04127 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 636.96 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW /6-04128 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.65 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE6-05155 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 120.57 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 458.17 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 458.17 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 458.17 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 458.17 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 458.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW /6-05156 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 1.83 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 6.95 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 6.95 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 6.95 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 6.95 11Page: Packet Page 70 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207654 3/20/2014 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 6.94 Total :8,982.43 207655 3/20/2014 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 CITY MARINA BEACH PARK CITY MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 130.43 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 292.40 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 267.25 MINI PARK6-00475 MINI PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 526.14 CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 130.43 CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 934.47 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 224.86 310 6TH AVE N6-02727 310 6TH AVE N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 198.86 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER6-02730 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201.84 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 198.86 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000 12Page: Packet Page 71 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207655 3/20/2014 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 372.31 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 130.43 CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575 CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 233.15 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 198.86 8100 185TH PL SW6-04425 8100 185TH PL SW 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 386.89 SIERRA PARK6-04450 SIERRA PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 285.45 BALLINGER PARK6-07775 BALLINGER PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 252.17 YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500 YOST PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 919.95 YOST PARK POOL6-08525 YOST PARK POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 212.70 23708 104TH AVE W HICKMAN PARK STORM8-40000 23708 104TH AVE W HICKMAN PARK STORM 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 906.50 Total :7,003.95 207656 3/20/2014 070118 ELECTRONIC DATA SOLUTIONS 14365 StormWater - GPS Maintenance Review and StormWater - GPS Maintenance Review and 422.000.72.531.40.35.00 260.00 9.5% Sales Tax 13Page: Packet Page 72 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207656 3/20/2014 (Continued)070118 ELECTRONIC DATA SOLUTIONS 422.000.72.531.40.35.00 24.70 Total :284.70 207657 3/20/2014 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD LG548401 NEWSPAPER AD closed pln review 001.000.25.514.30.44.00 43.00 Total :43.00 207658 3/20/2014 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 42359 Sewer - Supplies Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 119.52 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 11.35 PS - Alum Sheet43870 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.04 PS - Alum Sheet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 179.35 Total :327.26 207659 3/20/2014 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 44199 SHEET OF STEEL SHEET OF STEEL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 33.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.17 Total :36.55 207660 3/20/2014 074768 FARAM, JACOB JUROR4 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207661 3/20/2014 071026 FASTSIGNS OF LYNNWOOD 443 13675 CORNER PARK TAGS CORNER PARK TAGS 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 16.50 14Page: Packet Page 73 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207661 3/20/2014 (Continued)071026 FASTSIGNS OF LYNNWOOD 9.5% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 1.58 CORNER PARK TAGS443 13681 CORNER PARK TAGS 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 5.50 9.5% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 0.53 Total :24.11 207662 3/20/2014 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0410035 Meter Inventory - #2035~ Meter Inventory - #2035~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,121.20 Meter Inv - # 2036 ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,218.90 Water Inv - #0578~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 2,135.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 222.31 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 202.86 Total :4,900.67 207663 3/20/2014 074766 FRANKLIN, DIANE JUROR2 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207664 3/20/2014 011900 FRONTIER 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 28.69 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 28.68 PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, SPARE LINES425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 15.00 15Page: Packet Page 74 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207664 3/20/2014 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 74.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 62.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 62.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 83.98 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5TH AVE N425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 53.59 Total :410.91 207665 3/20/2014 074748 GLENN CONSULTING 106 BST Conference 2014 - T Moles BST Conference 2014 - T Moles 111.000.68.542.90.43.00 110.00 Total :110.00 207666 3/20/2014 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE GORSUCH 18124 I'M RELATED TO WHOM? 18124 I'M RELATED TO WHOM? 18124 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 74.00 Total :74.00 207667 3/20/2014 012199 GRAINGER 9382839562 PW - Regulator Repair Kits PW - Regulator Repair Kits 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 50.04 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.75 Total :54.79 207668 3/20/2014 074811 GUZMAN, SALLY GUZMAN 03172014 REFUND LATE FEE REFUND LATE FEE 001.000.239.200 20.00 Total :20.00 16Page: Packet Page 75 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207669 3/20/2014 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 144764 Water Inventory -# 0473 - ~ Water Inventory -# 0473 - ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 387.24 Water - Parts - Ells, Adapters, Plugs, 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3,427.20 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 36.79 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 325.58 Water Inventory - #334~144765 Water Inventory - #334~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 2,256.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 214.32 Water Inventory - #0334~144863 Water Inventory - #0334~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 2,538.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 241.11 Seaview Reservoir Cover567833 Seaview Reservoir Cover 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 928.00 Yost Reservoir Cover 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 928.00 Water - Wrenches 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 139.96 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 189.62 Total :11,611.82 207670 3/20/2014 074814 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC 23973 E2AC.SERVICES THRU 1/31/14 E2AC.Services thru 1/31/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 7,127.28 Total :7,127.28 207671 3/20/2014 074771 HARTMAN, MARK JUROR7 JURY DUTY FEE 17Page: Packet Page 76 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207671 3/20/2014 (Continued)074771 HARTMAN, MARK JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207672 3/20/2014 074782 HODGSON, DIANE JUROR18 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207673 3/20/2014 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2425484 Misc. office supplies including green Misc. office supplies including green 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 337.05 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 32.01 Total :369.06 207674 3/20/2014 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2422823 Office Supplies Office Supplies 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 207.29 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 19.69 Office Supplies2422937 Office Supplies 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 63.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 6.04 Total :296.57 207675 3/20/2014 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 1182076 C/A 768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 2,000.59 Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 7.87 Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.17 18Page: Packet Page 77 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :2,018.632076753/20/2014 071634 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 207676 3/20/2014 063319 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 03132014 501C3 USER FEE APPLICATION Edmonds BID application to IRS for 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 400.00 Total :400.00 207677 3/20/2014 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 1905701017399 INV#1905701017399 EDMONDS PD 24 PACK AA DURACELL BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 53.94 24 PACK AAA DURACELL BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 26.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 7.69 Total :88.60 207678 3/20/2014 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 495164 Unit 137 - Battery Unit 137 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 114.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.92 Unit 450 - Supplies61225901 Unit 450 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.33 Unit 25 - Battery61226088 Unit 25 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 85.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.17 Fleet Shop Supplies735807 Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 60.88 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 5.78 19Page: Packet Page 78 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :301.982076783/20/2014 014940 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 207679 3/20/2014 074784 JOHNSON, GAY JUROR20 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207680 3/20/2014 074790 JOHNSON, MARGARET JUROR26 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207681 3/20/2014 063493 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 13079445-00 FAC - Fan for Ladies Locker Room FAC - Fan for Ladies Locker Room 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 47.78 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.54 Total :61.32 207682 3/20/2014 074787 KELLY, WILLIAM JUROR23 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207683 3/20/2014 067306 LERN 11979-14 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL LERN MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL LERN 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 395.00 Total :395.00 207684 3/20/2014 074693 LETTERWORKS SIGN DESIGN 8512A WAYFINDING SIGNS COMPLETED IN 2014 WAYFINDING SIGNS COMPLETED IN 2014 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 2,760.26 9.5% Sales Tax 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 262.22 WAYFINDING SIGNS WORK COMPLETED IN 20148513a 20Page: Packet Page 79 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207684 3/20/2014 (Continued)074693 LETTERWORKS SIGN DESIGN WAYFINDING SIGNS WORK COMPLETED IN 2014 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 807.46 9.5% Sales Tax 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 76.71 Total :3,906.65 207685 3/20/2014 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 20152 expenses 01-14 EXPENSES 01-14 reimbursement for expenses - Five 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 15.00 03-14 LEGALS FEESMAR-2014 03-14 Legal fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 32,000.00 Total :32,015.00 207686 3/20/2014 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 6840 E1DA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/14 E1DA.Services thru 2/28/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 1,284.68 Total :1,284.68 207687 3/20/2014 074774 MAROHN, TINA JUROR10 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207688 3/20/2014 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1305 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 88.32 INTERPRETER FEES1306 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 88.32 Total :176.64 207689 3/20/2014 074810 MICHAELSON, MICHAEL MICHAELSON 03142014 REFUND, WAS NOT ABLE TO TRANSFER REFUND, WAS NOT ABLE TO TRANSFER 001.000.239.200 722.00 21Page: Packet Page 80 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :722.002076893/20/2014 074810 074810 MICHAELSON, MICHAEL 207690 3/20/2014 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 184107 SPARK PLUG SPARK PLUG 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 92.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.76 STARTER GRIP184283 STARTER GRIP 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.29 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.17 Total :114.47 207691 3/20/2014 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0369368-IN Storm - Ear Plugs Storm - Ear Plugs 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 289.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 27.46 Total :316.46 207692 3/20/2014 074306 NEBCO/NPRIT 4/1/2014 LEOFF Medical Premium LEOFF Medical Premium 617.000.51.522.20.23.00 1,283.53 LEOFF Medical Premium 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 9,503.85 Total :10,787.38 207693 3/20/2014 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0507525-IN Fleet Supplies Returns Fleet Supplies Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -22.20 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -2.11 Unit 14 - Filters0516066-IN Unit 14 - Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 45.68 22Page: Packet Page 81 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207693 3/20/2014 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.34 Fleet - Hyd Fluid Inventory0516067-IN Fleet - Hyd Fluid Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 434.46 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 41.28 Fleet Filter Inventory0516132-IN Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 54.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 5.14 Total :560.69 207694 3/20/2014 074770 NIMMERGUT, EILEEN JUROR6 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207695 3/20/2014 074779 NOBLE, ADAM JUROR15 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207696 3/20/2014 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-869954 CIVIC FIELD RENTALS CIVIC FIELD RENTALS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 112.35 EDMONDS ELEMENTARY RENTALS1-872503 EDMONDS ELEMENTARY RENTALS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 173.85 MADRONA ELEMENTARY1-872505 MADRONA ELEMENTARY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 177.85 SIERRA PARK RENTALS1-872993 SIERRA PARK RENTALS 23Page: Packet Page 82 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207696 3/20/2014 (Continued)061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 112.35 MARINA BEACH RENTALS1-873995 MARINA BEACH RENTALS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,007.20 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD RENTALS1-873997 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD RENTALS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 112.35 Total :1,695.95 207697 3/20/2014 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1649636 Fleet Shop - Supplies Fleet Shop - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 4.26 Shop - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 24.08 Unit 53 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.67 Total :55.01 207698 3/20/2014 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.0091-6 ACC # 2312-2716-6 FAC - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.59 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.10 Total :12.69 207699 3/20/2014 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.0208-6 PAINT PAINT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.53 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.14 Total :24.67 207700 3/20/2014 008475 PETTY CASH 1/1-3/19/14 PW - STAMPS PW - STAMPS 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 19.60 24Page: Packet Page 83 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207700 3/20/2014 (Continued)008475 PETTY CASH CITY HALL - FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 35.02 CITY HALL - SIGN POLISH 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.22 STREET - CDL - HIATT 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 86.00 STREET - SUPPLIES FOR YARD COVERS 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 54.74 STORM - FILE TABS 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 23.59 STORM - HAY FOR STORM DITCH 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 15.32 SEWER - BOX FOR SHIPPING TO CUES 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 15.32 FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.57 FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 26.57 FLEET - MOUSE FOR NEW COMPUTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.74 UNIT 65 -EQ81WR - LICENSE FEES 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 47.75 Total :386.44 207701 3/20/2014 068411 PHILLIPS 66 - CONOCO 76 683 Unit 405 Gas Unit 405 Gas 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 47.75 Total :47.75 207702 3/20/2014 064552 PITNEY BOWES 9607730MR14 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 02/28 TO 03/30 LEASE 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 718.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 68.98 25Page: Packet Page 84 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :787.582077023/20/2014 064552 064552 PITNEY BOWES 207703 3/20/2014 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC B782950 Sewer - Supplies Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 123.51 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 11.73 Sewer - SuppliesB801087 Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 62.99 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 5.98 Fac Maint - Small Tools for EricB804172 Fac Maint - Small Tools for Eric 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 107.30 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 10.19 Total :321.70 207704 3/20/2014 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756 ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 213.21 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 43.82 Total :257.03 207705 3/20/2014 074777 REID, KENNETH JUROR13 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207706 3/20/2014 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 27.89 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 26Page: Packet Page 85 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207706 3/20/2014 (Continued)061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 105.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 105.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 105.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 105.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 105.98 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 149.26 Total :707.01 207707 3/20/2014 070042 RICOH USA INC 91970727 Rent on Engineering MPC6000 color Rent on Engineering MPC6000 color 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 443.48 Rent on large copier 907EX for billing91970729 Rent on large copier 907EX for billing 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 827.00 Total :1,270.48 207708 3/20/2014 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL 2337134 Storm - Blocks, Bricks Storm - Blocks, Bricks 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 102.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.69 Total :111.69 207709 3/20/2014 074780 SCHILLING, VAN JUROR16 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207710 3/20/2014 074799 SEATTLE HOME APPLICANCE LS00002456 PS - Fridge and set up 27Page: Packet Page 86 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207710 3/20/2014 (Continued)074799 SEATTLE HOME APPLICANCE PS - Fridge and set up 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 610.00 Total :610.00 207711 3/20/2014 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 89780 E4FC.SERVICES THRU 2/15/14 E4FC.Services thru 2/15/14 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 1,605.00 Total :1,605.00 207712 3/20/2014 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 199757 INV#199757 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2000 VOLK GOLF #ANP4848 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Total :173.01 207713 3/20/2014 036955 SKY NURSERY T-0250615 WATER - BARK FOR LS Water - Bark for LS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 50.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4.75 Water - Three Way SoilT-0250640 Water - Three Way Soil 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 120.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11.40 Total :186.15 207714 3/20/2014 036955 SKY NURSERY T-0257822 PARKS FLOWER PROGRAM PARKS FLOWER PROGRAM 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 56.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 5.32 MAPLET-0258921 MAPLE 28Page: Packet Page 87 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207714 3/20/2014 (Continued)036955 SKY NURSERY 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 64.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.17 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIEST-0258925 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 230.77 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.92 FLOWER PROGRAM HANGING BASKETST-0258926 FLOWER PROGRAM HANGING BASKETS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 391.92 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.23 GROUNDCOVER 2ND AND MAINT-0259345 GROUNDCOVER 2ND AND MAIN 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 67.83 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 6.44 Total :888.59 207715 3/20/2014 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / METER LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 207.47 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW D2014-3123-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.86 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 102044-2584-7 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 229.71 Total :470.04 207716 3/20/2014 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2011-8453-8 23700 104TH AVE W 23700 104TH AVE W 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 248.04 29Page: Packet Page 88 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :248.042077163/20/2014 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 207717 3/20/2014 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE SCJ INMATE MED 02/14 INMATE MEDICATION 02/14 - EDMONDS PD INMATE MEDICATION - FEB 2014 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 45.05 Total :45.05 207718 3/20/2014 037521 SNO CO TREASURER 00479000100302 2014 FIRST HALF SURFACE WATER TAX 2014 Surface Water Charges - 23009 88th 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 263.49 Total :263.49 207719 3/20/2014 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 14-306-2 Q2-14 COMMUNICATIONS Q2-14 Communicatons 001.000.39.528.00.51.00 192,701.80 Q2-14 Communicatons 421.000.74.534.80.51.00 5,071.10 Q2-14 Communicatons 423.000.75.535.80.51.00 5,071.10 Q2-14 NEW WORLD ASSESSMENT14-306-2A Q2-14 New World Assessment 001.000.39.528.00.51.00 19,816.75 Total :222,660.75 207720 3/20/2014 074791 SNODIE, MARY JUROR27 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207721 3/20/2014 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES 3/12/2014 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES SCC City/County Summit 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 105.00 Total :105.00 207722 3/20/2014 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES 3/12/2014 - 2-20 Din 4 Councilmembers attend SCC dinner 4 Councilmembers attend SCC dinner 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 140.00 30Page: Packet Page 89 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :140.002077223/20/2014 067609 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES 207723 3/20/2014 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4230688-01 Fac Maint - Work Jeans (5) T Godbey Fac Maint - Work Jeans (5) T Godbey 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 200.10 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 19.01 Total :219.11 207724 3/20/2014 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L102209 JAN & FEB-14 AUDIT FEES Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 001.000.39.519.90.51.00 901.01 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 422.000.72.531.90.51.00 45.05 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 421.000.74.534.80.51.00 150.17 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 423.000.75.535.80.51.00 150.17 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 150.17 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 111.000.68.543.30.51.00 45.05 Jan & Feb-14 Audit Fees 511.000.77.548.68.51.00 60.06 Total :1,501.68 207725 3/20/2014 074773 STEADMAN, CLAIRE JUROR9 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207726 3/20/2014 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 3341318 Sewer - Cleaning Supplies Sewer - Cleaning Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 110.37 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.49 31Page: Packet Page 90 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207726 3/20/2014 (Continued)009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC Sewer - Safety Glasses3343778 Sewer - Safety Glasses 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 42.06 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 4.00 Sewer - Tape Rules3343779 Sewer - Tape Rules 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 73.80 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 7.01 Total :247.73 207727 3/20/2014 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3002566521 INV#3002566521 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD MEDIUM BOX DISPOSAL 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 51.52 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 1.92 Total :53.44 207728 3/20/2014 074788 STEVENSON, CLAY JUROR24 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207729 3/20/2014 071666 TETRA TECH INC 50775010 E3FC.SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY 2014 E3FC.Services thru February 2014 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 7,723.67 Total :7,723.67 207730 3/20/2014 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 377631 FAC - Water Main Vent Valves (2) FAC - Water Main Vent Valves (2) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 234.20 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.61 9.5% Sales Tax 32Page: Packet Page 91 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207730 3/20/2014 (Continued)027269 THE PART WORKS INC 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.26 Total :268.07 207731 3/20/2014 074781 THOMPSEN, HANS JUROR17 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207732 3/20/2014 068105 THORSON BARNETT & MCDONALD PC 67335 MEBT Legal Services MEBT Legal Services 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 744.00 Total :744.00 207733 3/20/2014 061233 TOWN & COUNTRY CHRYSLER 366957 Unit 121 - Power St Fluid Unit 121 - Power St Fluid 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.38 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.80 Total :9.18 207734 3/20/2014 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 20665 CHANGE SAFE COMBINATION CHANGE SAFE COMBINATION 001.000.23.523.30.48.00 125.93 Total :125.93 207735 3/20/2014 074800 TURNSTYLE INC 3000 EDMONDS BID BRAND STRATEGY CONSULTANT Edmonds BID brand strategy consultant. 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 5,520.00 Total :5,520.00 207736 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 5923 PARKING FOR TPA MTG AT SNO CO Parking while attending Tourism 001.000.61.558.70.43.00 6.00 Total :6.00 207737 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 2519 INV#2519 03/06/14 - TRAINING - EDMONDS P 33Page: Packet Page 92 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207737 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK MEAL/ASST SEATTLE PD-SEAHAWKS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 29.37 LODGING/BARKER/WA HOMICIDE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 84.70 LODGING/MORRISON/WA HOMICIDE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 84.70 LODGING/TRYKAR/WA HOMICIDE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 84.70 INV#3181 03/06/14 - BARD - EDMONDS PD3181 MINDFLASH-MO FEE FOR ONLINE TRAINING 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 199.00 ENGRAVING ON 11 FLASHLIGHTS 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 27.10 STREAMLIGHT TRAFFIC WANDS 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 54.12 REG/FROLAND/INTERVIEWING 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 185.00 REG/BICKAR/ST CRIMES SEMINAR 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 399.00 TLO SEARCHES 02/2014 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 1.75 INV#7914 03/06/14 - THOMPSON - EDMONDS P7914 BANKERS BOXES 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 118.83 KEYS FOR REBUILT DETECTIVE DESKS 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 23.80 Total :1,292.07 207738 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 3470 DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION BulkRegister.com - domain name 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 55.80 DATA RECOVERY SERVICE, HP COMPUTER, ASUS5179 Amazon.com - Exchange Server 2010 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 86.08 34Page: Packet Page 93 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207738 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK Secure Data Recovery - recovery services 001.000.31.518.88.41.00 1,360.99 HP Direct - HP EliteDesk 800 G1 computer 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 1,168.13 TigerDirect.com - Intel next unit of 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 371.89 UPS - return freight and pick up 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 22.10 Newegg.com - APC Back-UPS ES BE350G - 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 298.12 Newegg.com - SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 110.32 Newegg.com - ASUS VS Series VS228H-P 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 295.16 Experts Exchange LLC - IT Solutions 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 12.95 Newegg.com - ASUS VS Series VS228H-P 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 295.16 Newegg.com - Tripp Lite 1 ft DMS59 to 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 16.57 Newegg.com - Coboc CY-U3-AAMF-1.5-BK 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 18.29 Newegg.com - Premium Black Display port 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 79.90 Newegg.com - ASUS VS Series VS228H-P 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 147.58 SERVERSUPPLY.COM RETURN5179 ServerSupply.com - Lenovo Integrated 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 -80.75 Total :4,258.29 207739 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 3249 CREDIT CARD BILL JUROR LUNCH 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 91.15 35Page: Packet Page 94 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207739 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK TRAINING MANAGING COURT FINANCIAL 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 595.00 USPS - PASSPORT POSTAGE 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 131.30 Total :817.45 207740 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 7483 FEB MAYORS MEETING February Mayor's Meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 10.75 March Mayor's Meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 11.30 Total :22.05 207741 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 3546 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIES MITEL 5340 IP PHONE 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 206.48 MITEL HANDSET WITH CHARGING PLATE 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 178.75 IPAD PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR WATER/SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 189.98 IPAD PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR WATER/SEWER 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 189.98 PRINTER INK FOR SIGN SHOP 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 28.99 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.23 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.23 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.75 Total :809.39 207742 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 5593 CITY CLERK PURCHASE CARD Misc recorded documents 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 385.00 36Page: Packet Page 95 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207742 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK Recording of Utility Liens 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 48.00 Recording of Utility Liens 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 48.00 Total :481.00 207743 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 3405 American Safety - Software for Fac Maint American Safety - Software for Fac Maint 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 77.95 QFC - Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.99 Guardian Security - Old PW Security 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 55.00 Pro Gard Prod - Unit Dual Stage7299 Pro Gard Prod - Unit Dual Stage 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 171.00 OReilly's Auto - Unit 85 - Seal 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.49 Talley Inc - Unit eq94 - Antenna's 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 184.95 OReilly's Auto - Unit 62 - Fuel Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.33 Radio Shack - Unit 83 - 12v Submini Lamp 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.18 Pro-Gard - Unit - Airbag Switch 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 171.00 Total :682.89 207744 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 6045 Chuck Miller 2014 Annual Education Chuck Miller 2014 Annual Education 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 300.00 Linda Thornquist 2014 Annual Education 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 300.00 Leif Bjorback 2014 Annual Education 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 300.00 37Page: Packet Page 96 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207744 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK Patric Lawler 2014 Annual Education 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 300.00 Mike Thies 2014 Annual Education 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 150.00 Westgate PB Public Hearing 3/14. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 167.09 Expediting Grant Application by Kernen 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 38.95 Receipt tapes for receptionist payment 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 47.36 Total :1,603.40 207745 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 4675 DADDY DAUGHTER SUPPLIES DADDY DAUGHTER SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 4.36 DADDY DAUGHTER DANCE SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 24.17 ARTS NORTHWEST MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 145.00 SHIPPING ARTWORK TO CJDESIGNS 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 13.92 DUCK TAPE FOR DAYCAMP CRAFTS 001.000.64.575.53.31.00 68.03 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 94.66 DAYCAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.53.31.00 20.66 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 2.88 DAYCAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.53.31.00 11.00 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 15.37 WRPA EMBRACING ECONOMIC CHANGE MCRAE 38Page: Packet Page 97 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207745 3/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 99.00 NUTRITION TEACHING SUPPLIES FOR 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 20.77 POSTERS FOR WOTS MAILING 123.000.64.573.20.49.00 563.92 SURGE PROTECTOR FOR PRESCHOOL 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 9.30 LANYARDS AND WHISTLES 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 18.21 Total :1,111.25 207746 3/20/2014 062693 US BANK 3389 USB cable for 2 councilmembers for USB cable for 2 councilmembers for 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 83.24 Logitech wireless keyboard for 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 30.07 Total :113.31 207747 3/20/2014 074772 WAITE, JANET JUROR8 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207748 3/20/2014 074812 WAKEFIELD, LEILA WAKEFIELD 03172014 REFUND CUSTOMER REQUESTED REFUND CUSTOMER REQUESTED 001.000.239.200 62.00 Total :62.00 207749 3/20/2014 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 50763 INV#50763 - EDMONDS PD TOW 1992 NISSAN #ALU4691 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Total :173.01 39Page: Packet Page 98 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207750 3/20/2014 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-9467 Street - 8006 180th Pl W - Remove dead Street - 8006 180th Pl W - Remove dead 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 430.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 40.85 Total :470.85 207751 3/20/2014 026510 WCIA ED-204 Cultural Diversity Training Cultural Diversity Training 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,400.00 Total :2,400.00 207752 3/20/2014 064800 WEHOP 468232 GERANIUMS GERANIUMS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 876.51 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 83.27 KUMQUATS468238 KUMQUATS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 869.01 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 82.56 BLACK MAGIC468239 BLACK MAGIC 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 79.24 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 7.53 Freight468240 Freight 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 275.40 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.16 Total :2,299.68 207753 3/20/2014 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 69965 WORK BOOTS FREEBORN WORK BOOTS FREEBORN 40Page: Packet Page 99 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207753 3/20/2014 (Continued)072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 193.00 WORKBOOTS HARRIS70028 WORKBOOTS HARRIS 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 193.00 Total :386.00 207754 3/20/2014 074775 WISEMILLER, EUGENE JUROR11 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 31.20 Total :31.20 207755 3/20/2014 074783 WOO, WING JUROR19 JURY DUTY FEE JURY DUTY FEE 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 207756 3/20/2014 074809 WRECKING BALL DEMOLITION LLC 031408A-01 YOST POOL REMOVING LEAD PAINT FROM YOST POOL REMOVING LEAD PAINT FROM 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 3,206.34 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 304.60 Total :3,510.94 207757 3/20/2014 045565 WSPCA 2014 WSPCA CONF 2014 WSPCA SPRING CONF - ROBINSON - EDMO CONFERENCE FEE - MEMBER RATE~ 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.00 Total :300.00 207758 3/20/2014 074813 YOUNG, BETH YOUNG 03182014 REFUND WENT FROM 2 DAYS A WEEK TO ONE - REFUND WENT FROM 2 DAYS A WEEK TO ONE - 001.000.239.200 89.00 Total :89.00 207759 3/20/2014 071604 ZOHO CORPORATION 2067603 HELP DESK & DESKTOP MANAGEMENT MAINTENAN ServiceDesk Plus Enterprise Edition 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 4,995.00 41Page: Packet Page 100 of 182 03/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 8:35:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 207759 3/20/2014 (Continued)071604 ZOHO CORPORATION Desktop Center Professional Edition 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 995.00 Total :5,990.00 Bank total :450,648.68150 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 450,648.68Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report150 42Page: Packet Page 101 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c426 E4FD WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 102 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES m013 E7FG SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 103 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 104 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program STR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project STR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza PM c282 E8MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM c290 E8MB Marina Beach Additional Parking STR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program SWR c298 E8GA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR c301 E8GD City-Wide Sewer Improvements SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design STM c307 E9FB Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation STR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements WTR c324 E0IA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements STM c326 E0FC Stormwater GIS Support FAC c327 E0LA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project STR c329 E0AA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade FAC c332 E0LB Senior Center Roof Repairs WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program STM c339 E1FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program STM c341 E1FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment SWR c347 E1GA 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement STM c349 E1FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 105 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title STR c354 E1DA Sunset Walkway Improvements WTR c363 E0JA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program STR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update General c372 E1EA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM c374 E1FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain STM c376 E1FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM c378 E2FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM c382 E2FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update STR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project FAC c393 E3LA Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STR c399 E2CC 5th Ave Overlay Project STR c404 E2AC Citywide Safety Improvements STR c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM c406 E3FA 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM c407 E3FB 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM c408 E3FC Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM c409 E3FD Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM c410 E3FE Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive WTR c418 E3JB 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC c419 E3LB ESCO III Project STR c420 E3AA School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR c421 E3DA 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 106 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title WTR c422 E4JA 2014 Waterline Replacement Program STR c423 E3DB 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR c424 E3DC 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR c425 E3DD 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM c426 E4FD 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STR c426 E3DE ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STR c427 E3AB SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM c428 E3FF 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM c430 E3FH SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM c433 E4FA 2014 Drainage Improvements STM c434 E4FB LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM c435 E4FC 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STR i005 E7AC 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM m013 E7FG NPDES Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 107 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 108 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c426 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 109 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road STM E7FG m013 NPDES PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 110 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c426 E4FD STM NPDES m013 E7FG STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 111 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 112 of 182 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA Revised 3/19/2014Packet Page 113 of 182 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 661 (03/01/2014 to 03/15/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description 111 26.00 0.00NO PAY LEAVEABSENT 112 128.75 0.00NO PAY NON HIREDABSENT 121 596.50 23,329.68SICK LEAVESICK 122 810.00 29,598.09VACATIONVACATION 123 37.75 1,321.81HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY 124 68.00 2,347.12FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY 125 170.50 6,067.31COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS 129 80.00 3,196.17Police Sick Leave L & ISICK 141 40.00 1,818.15BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT 150 108.00 4,080.96Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS 152 0.38 12.03COMPTIME BUY BACKCOMP HOURS 155 147.41 6,003.35COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS 157 95.47 3,062.55SICK LEAVE PAYOFFSICK 158 192.26 6,167.12VACATION PAYOFFVACATION 160 1.00 41.06MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION 190 14,518.00 530,247.53REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS 195 36.00 1,159.87ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVEREGULAR HOURS 196 80.00 3,196.17LIGHT DUTYREGULAR HOURS 210 14.95 355.08OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS 215 48.00 2,219.10WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS 216 15.00 1,391.66STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS 220 206.25 11,854.28OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS 225 13.50 868.70OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS 411 0.00 941.93SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 602 90.25 0.00ACCRUED COMPCOMP HOURS 604 185.00 0.00ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS 902 0.00 -259.00BOOT ALLOWANCEMISCELLANEOUS acc 0.00 23.56ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUS acs 0.00 161.90ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUS boc 0.00 81.17BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUS cpl 0.00 137.44TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUS crt 0.00 597.57CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUS det 0.00 95.89DETECTIVE PAYMISCELLANEOUS 03/19/2014 Page 1 of 2 Packet Page 114 of 182 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 661 (03/01/2014 to 03/15/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description det4 0.00 923.69Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUS ed1 0.00 736.66EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAY ed2 0.00 834.14EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAY ed3 0.00 4,836.73EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAY fmla 7.00 0.00FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAIDABSENT fmlc 65.00 2,791.64Family Medical Leave-Comp UsedCOMP HOURS fmlh 15.00 644.23Family Medical Leave-Hol UsedHOLIDAY fmls 80.00 4,192.00FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICK hol 4.00 120.58HOLIDAYHOLIDAY k9 0.00 190.11K-9 PAYMISCELLANEOUS lg1 0.00 2,027.49LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITY lg2 0.00 1,265.29LONGEVITY PAY 4%LONGEVITY PAY lg3 0.00 4,861.08LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAY lg4 0.00 380.42Longevity 1%LONGEVITY lg5 0.00 66.98Longevity 3%LONGEVITY lg6 0.00 329.43Longevity .5%LONGEVITY lg7 0.00 617.17Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITY mtc 0.00 191.78MOTORCYCLE PAYMISCELLANEOUS ooc 0.00 242.635% OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS pdla 20.00 0.00Pregnancy Disabil/NON PAIDABSENT pds 0.00 44.66Public Disclosure SpecialistMISCELLANEOUS phy 0.00 1,559.12PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUS prof 0.00 147.00PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SERGEANMISCELLANEOUS sdp 0.00 494.56SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%MISCELLANEOUS sgt 0.00 147.00ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANTMISCELLANEOUS slw 52.69 0.00SICK LEAVE ADD BACKSICK traf 0.00 302.03TRAFFICMISCELLANEOUS Total Net Pay:$454,471.94 $668,064.67 17,952.66 03/19/2014 Page 2 of 2 Packet Page 115 of 182 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 661 - 03/01/2014 to 03/15/2014 Bank: usbank - US Bank Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 60876 03/20/2014 mebt AST TTEE 80,498.47 0.00 60877 03/20/2014 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 2,925.00 0.00 60878 03/20/2014 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 436.50 0.00 60879 03/20/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 710.76 0.00 60880 03/20/2014 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 4,167.05 0.00 60881 03/20/2014 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,452.57 0.00 60882 03/20/2014 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 2,019.14 0.00 95,209.49 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 2062 03/20/2014 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 18,169.50 0.00 2063 03/20/2014 us US BANK 87,939.28 0.00 2066 03/20/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 65.00 0.00 106,173.78 0.00 201,383.27 0.00Grand Totals: Page 1 of 13/19/2014 Packet Page 116 of 182 AM-6700 4. D. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Brian Tuley Submitted By:Scott Passey Department:City Clerk's Office Committee: Finance Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval to Surplus City Computer Equipment Recommendation Approve the surplusing of certain computer equipment. Previous Council Action The Council Finance Committee directed that this item be forwarded to the full Council for approval on the Consent Agenda. Narrative Certain City computer equipment is obsolete, non-functional or no longer of useful service to the City. The process of surplusing computer equipment is to remove it from service, hold it for 90 days, then wipe the hard drive, and donate or recycle it. The items proposed for surplusing are included in Attachment 1. Attachments Attachment 1 - List of Surplus Computers Form Review Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 03/14/2014 04:23 PM Final Approval Date: 03/14/2014 Packet Page 117 of 182 The following list of computer equipment is obsolete, non-functional or no longer of useful service to the City Of Edmonds. As such, we recommend the equipment to be donated. Model SN# HP NC6000 laptop 2UA51503FY HP Compaq dc5100 MT(EQ167US) 2UA61302YK HP Compaq dc5100 MT(EQ167US) 2UA61302YL HP Compaq dc5100 MT(EQ167US) 2UA6310WN9 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DFZ HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DG2 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DG8 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DG9 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGB HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGC HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGD HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGL HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGM HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGQ HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGW HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DGX HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DH2 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DH3 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DH6 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DH8 HP Compaq dc5700 Microtower 2UA7010DHC HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower 2UA85203WC HP dc5000 uT(DZ216AV) 2UB505086L HP dc5000 uT(DZ216AV) 2UB505086W HP dc5000 uT(DZ216AV) 2UB505087B HP dc5000 uT(DZ216AV) 2UB5310G6Z Panasonic CF-Y4 laptop CF- Y4HWPZZBM HP DH939U#ABA laptop CNF3502SJR HP PG526UA#ABA laptop CNF4311MLM HP PG523UA#ABA laptop CNF446056Z GN553AA-ABA m9040n CNH7400SYG GN553AA-ABA m9040n CNH7400T8G GN553AA-ABA m9040n CNH7400VNB IBM 8307-49U KCDN15H IBM 8189-D7U KCXL97C IBM 8307-25U KLGPN2F HP dc5100 uT (PZ583UA) MXL54800NL Packet Page 118 of 182 HP dc5100 uT (PZ583UA) MXL6020B42 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917QP HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917QR HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917QT HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917QX HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917QZ HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917R0 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917R3 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917R5 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917R6 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917RC HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917RF HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL81917RJ HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL8501HB3 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL8501HB5 HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower MXL8501HB7 Packet Page 119 of 182 AM-6706 6. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:20 Minutes Submitted For:Fire Chief Ed Widdis Submitted By:John Westfall Department:Fire Committee: Type: Information Information Subject Title 2013 Annual Report - Snohomish County Fire District 1 Recommendation No recommended actions. Previous Council Action None. Narrative Snohomish County Fire District #1 (FD1) Board of Commissioners will be present in a joint meeting with Edmonds City Council. Fire Chief Ed Widdis and staff will present and provide comments to his 2013 Fire Chief's Report that is FD1's comprehensive annual report of fire, paramedical services, training, prevention, and public educational activities. Fire staff will discuss FD1's emergency response performance. In 2005, the Washington State Legislature adopted a bill (HB 1756) that requires substantially career fire departments to maintain policy establishing the existence of the fire department, identifying the services provided and the basic organizational structure of the fire department, and the service delivery/response time objectives for the fire department for those emergency services. This report is intended to provide our elected officials and the community with a true picture of how well the fire department has performed in meeting the adopted response objectives. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 11:21 AM Mayor Dave Earling 03/20/2014 01:48 PM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 02:55 PM Form Started By: John Westfall Started On: 03/19/2014 06:26 PM Final Approval Date: 03/20/2014 Packet Page 120 of 182 AM-6712 7. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:60 Minutes Submitted For:Phil Williams Submitted By:Robert English Department:Engineering Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Potential Action Information Subject Title Public Comment and Continued Discussion on the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project. Recommendation Previous Council Action On March 4, 2014, the proposed Sunset Avenue Walkway Project was discussed and public comment was received by the City Council. The City Council requested staff to evaluate additional design concepts based on the comments received during the meeting. Narrative This item is a continued discussion on the proposed Sunset Avenue Walkway project. Staff will make a presentation on additional design concepts for Sunset Avenue and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of each concept. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 03/20/2014 04:50 PM Public Works Phil Williams 03/21/2014 07:23 AM City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 08:27 AM Mayor Dave Earling 03/21/2014 09:25 AM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 09:48 AM Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 03/20/2014 04:11 PM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 121 of 182 AM-6714 8. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:15 Minutes Submitted By:Carrie Hite Department:Parks and Recreation Review Committee: Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Type: Information Information Subject Title Yost Pool Operations Recommendation Council receive presentation, ask questions, give staff guidance. Previous Council Action As part of the Strategic Plan, Council adopted a medium to high priority item for Parks to create and implement a long term financial and operational strategy for Yost pool. As part of the 2014 PROS plan, Council adopted strategies for the Parks Department to create and enter into partnerships in order to provide cost effective operations. Narrative As Council may recall, Yost pool costs approx. $210,000 to operate seasonally. We collect approx. $150,000 per year in revenue, subsidizing the pool by about $60,000. Staff have been exploring partnership models to operate Yost Pool, in order to create both effectiveness and efficiencies. After several months of discussion, we are recommending the City partner with the Dale Turner Y to staff the pool operations this summer. The City has created a similar schedule to last year, and will have operational control over the maintenance, revenue collection, and programming. The Y would provide a pool manager and staffing to operate the pool. This model provides potential expenditure savings of $15,000-$20,000, and would be a one year pilot program. Because the contract with the Y will be under $100,000, the Mayor has the ability to authorize this contract and action. This presentation to Council is to answer any questions, and to determine if there are any concerns to mitigate. Packet Page 122 of 182 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 10:41 AM Mayor Dave Earling 03/21/2014 10:57 AM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 11:25 AM Form Started By: Carrie Hite Started On: 03/21/2014 10:16 AM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 123 of 182 AM-6709 9. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:25 Minutes Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Debra Sharp Department:Finance Committee: Finance Type: Action Information Subject Title March 2014 Budget Amendment Ordinance Recommendation For Council for approval Previous Council Action Discussed at March 11th Finance Committee Narrative The first part of the budget amendment contains carry forward items from 2013. The departments would like to move the expenditure appropriation from 2013 to 2014. Three of the General Fund amendments include grant revenue that was received in prior years but not completely expended in 2013. One of the General Fund carry forward items is for the Code re-organization that was budgeted for but not used in 2013. The Planning Department would like to consolidate the unexpended funds with the $75,000 budgeted in 2014. The Building Department is asking for an increase to their professional services budget based on increased permit revenues received in 2013 and workload increases in 2014. There are two budget amendments included that were part of the 2014 Budget process. The transfer from REET 2 to the Parks Construction Fund as a reserve for the Marsh Restoration project was included in the REET 2 budget but the transfer into the Parks Construction Fund was not included. The transfer from the General Fund into Fund 617 was eliminated during the budget process but the removal of the transfer into Fund 617 was not included. A budget amendment is included regarding the refunding of the City's 2003 UTGO bond. The amendment includes budget appropriation to receive the refinancing proceeds and payment to the Bank of New York. The amendment also includes a transfer from the General Fund to a new debt service fund, (232) 2014 Debt Service Fund, for the debt service costs associated with the refinancing and the new 2014 debt service amounts. Other items included in the March budget amendment include the City's Wellness Program and new fitness room equipment. The Street Department is asking to re-instate one full-time position that was eliminated in 2010. The majority of the amendments pertain to construction and capital projects that were budgeted for in 2013 but not completed and need budget appropriation moved from 2013 to 2014. Packet Page 124 of 182 Please note: Additional budget clarification requested by Mayor Earling has been added as attachments. Engineering recalculated their Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Retrofit budget request on page 43, increaing the request from $122,873 to $128,037. Attachments Building Professional Services Engineering Capital Projects Parks Budget Street Position Swedish Hospital March 2014 Budget Amendment Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 03/20/2014 09:59 AM City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 11:21 AM Finance Scott James 03/20/2014 01:04 PM City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 02:55 PM Mayor Dave Earling 03/20/2014 08:39 PM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 08:30 AM Form Started By: Scott James Started On: 03/20/2014 09:49 AM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 125 of 182 MEMO To: Deb Sharp, Finance From: Leif Bjorback, Building Official Rob Chave, Acting Development Services Director Re: Building Professional Services, Budget Amendment Date: March 14, 2014 Questions arose during the Finance Committee discussion on this item. The need for this budget adjustment is included in the amendment description – please refer to that description for more detail. Basically it involves moving excess 2013 permit fee revenue forward into 2014 to enable timely reviews of complex design projects without hiring additional staff. Historically the Building Professional Services budget has been used to allow the City to use outside consultant services to supplement staff reviews for these complex projects without having additional in-house staff with that level of expertise (most often related to engineered structural reviews). We are currently experiencing high volumes of permit activity. At this point we are not confident that this represents a new level of permit activity that will continue in future years, so we don’t believe hiring additional staff is necessary or prudent at this time. It also needs to be understood that by state law permit revenue can only be used for permitting activities; excess permit revenues cannot end up as general fund revenues used to support general government operations. In fact, the State Auditor, in their most recent audit, reviewed City records to ensure that City permitting revenues did not exceed the cost of providing permit review services. Packet Page 126 of 182 Capital Project Budget Amendment Responses 2012 SS Replacement Summary This amendment will provide additional sewer utility funds for the 2012 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. The amendment will program $67,900 in unspent project funds from 2013 and $350,000 in unspent funds from 2013 that were part of the Lift Station Rehabilitation project to match the current budget needed to complete the project. The $350,000 will allow the project to extend the pipe system on Railroad Avenue between Main Street and Dayton by an additional 200 feet. This will remove the need for the city to acquire additional easements or rights of way to provide service in that area for any future developments and will greatly improve access to the system for repair and maintenance purposes. 2013 SS Replacement Summary This amendment will provide additional sewer utility funds for the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. The amendment will program $38,446 in unspent project funds from 2013, $500,000 that was going to be spent as part of the 2014 CIPP Rehabilitation project to take place in 2014, and $300,000 in bond proceeds. The additional funds are needed for the following improvements that are now included in the project: 1. One additional site located on the intersection of 228th Street and 73rd Pl W was added to the project. This is because during the utility review process for the 228th Street corridor improvements it was determined that the sewer main under portions of that project needed to be replaced. Since the transportation corridor improvements are now planned for 2015, the replacement of the pipes needs to be done prior to that date. Approximately 860 linear feet of pipe will be replaced at this location. 2. During the design process of the sewer main replacement at Edmonds and 7th Avenue, it was determined that it was not possible to achieve adequate drainage slope for the sewer mains to drain properly. Using our GIS database, a basin wide evaluation was made to determine a solution for achieving adequate slope in the pipe. It was determined that 600 feet of new sewer main in Daley St, between 6th and 7th Avenues, would correct the pipe slope and solve the on-going maintenance problems. This also provides the benefit of switching 80 homes that currently drain to Lift Station #1 to simply draining to the City’s gravity system that flows directly to the wastewater treatment plant. This will result in lower on-going operational costs, since it reduces the pumping effort at Lift Station #1. 3. Finally, it was also determined that it was not possible to achieve adequate drainage slope for the sewer main replacement at 8th Avenue and Fir St. After reviewing site conditions, it was determined that adequate slope could be achieved if approximately 160 feet of downstream pipe was reinstalled deeper than current conditions. Packet Page 127 of 182 City-Wide Drainage Replacement, Extension Annually, the Stormwater Capital Fund has this project as a line item. This item is used to solve emerging stormwater issues and results in one or more projects. In late August and early September 2013, we had several large storm events that exposed some weakness in the City's stormwater management system. Since these storms occurred towards the end of the year, the projects will extend into 2014. For 2014 added scope includes the following projects begun in 2013: • North Shellbarger Basin Improvements – Basin modeling and expedited design of larger capacity on 4th Ave S. between Dayon St and Walnut Street - $56,770 • Northstream Inlet Improvements – Design improved inlet condion on culvet going under Puget Drive to prevent pondind behind culvert– $25,230. The 2013 budget for this project was $149,000 and this amendment will program $82,000 of the unspent 2013 funds into the 2014 Budget. The Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study The original 2013 budget for this project was $200,000. The Department of Ecology sent out a grant notice in early 2013 for conducting stormwater retrofit planning and pre-Design. Ecology’s goal for this grant funding is to develop a list of projects to fund design and construction for the 2015 legislative session. The City sent in a grant proposal on April 5, 2013 to expand its current flow reduction study to include flow monitoring and a pre-design report. On April 30, 2013, Ecology notified the City that our grant proposal had been selected for funding at the amount of $188,722. The grant was approved by Council Committee on May 14, 2014 and by the Full Council on May 21, 2013. The City received the final grant agreement from Ecology on July 23, 2013. The Mayor signed the grant agreement on July 31, 2013 and Ecology signed it on August 8, 2013. The project was originally scheduled to be completed by mid-June 2014, with $200,000 spent in 2013 and the balance $172,722 in 2014 (This latter number was in the 2014 budget - the number should have been $188,722, the amount of the grant.). Therefore, the total project budget was intended to be $388,772 (City’s original $200,000 + $188,772 from the grant). The project schedule was delayed in 2013 due to extended review times by the Department of Ecology on the grant-required Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). As such, the actual 2013 expenditure was only $87,963. This left $300,809 to be spent in 2014. This amendment requests the $112,037 in spending authority not used in 2013 be moved into the 2014 budget ($200,000 – $87,963). An additional $16,000 in spending authority is also requested to make up the difference in what was in 2014 budget for the grant amount ($172,772) and the actual grant amount Packet Page 128 of 182 ($188,772). The $112,037 from 2013 plus the $16,000 difference between what was programmed for the grant and the actual grant equals $128,037 in this amendment. This amendment plus the $172,772 originally approved for this project in the 2014 budget will take the project to its spending authority of $300,809 for 2014. 105th/106th Street SW Drainage Improvements This project was in the 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (SW Edmonds Study Project 4). Interim fixes were constructed in 2011 which provided relief to residents on a short-term basis. However, strong storms in late summer 2013 resulted in flooding and indicated that additional stormwater improvements were needed in the area. The proposed project will infiltrate the majority of storm water run-off from this 10 acre neighborhood. Grant funds from the Department of Ecology were made available for a low impact development solution. This project is funded by a grant from the Department of Ecology received in the fall of 2013 and it did not get into the 2014 budget. This Grant was approved by Council Committee on August 13, 2013 and by the full Council on August 20, 2013. The Mayor signed the Grant Acceptance Intent Notice (GAIN) from Ecology on August 22, 2013. Ecology sent a draft grant agreement to the City on August 23, 2013 and the City responded with comments on the draft agreement on August 26, 2013. On September 23, 2013, Ecology sent a suggested format for describing the LID projects covered by the grant and the City was informed that these summaries had to be submitted within 1 week (due October 1, 2013) to be included in the grant agreement. The City sent in the two project summaries on October 1, 2013, one of which was the The105th/106th St. SW Drainage Improvements. The other project was for a Perrinville Creek High Flow Management project. The City received approval from Ecology on the project summaries on October 18, 2013 and received the final grant agreement on October 22, 2013. The grant was signed by the Mayor October 25, 2013 and by Ecology on November 12, 2013. The Perrinville Creek LID Retrofit Preliminary Design Project Is funded by a grant from the Department of Ecology received in the fall of 2013 and it did not get into the 2014 budget. This Grant was approved by Council Committee on August 13, 2013 and by the full Council on August 20, 2013. The Mayor signed the Grant Acceptance Intent Notice (GAIN) from Ecology on August 22, 2013. Ecology sent a draft grant agreement to the City on August 23, 2013 and the City responded with comments on the draft agreement on August 26, 2013. On September 23, 2013, Ecology sent a suggested format for describing the LID projects covered by the grant and the City was informed that these summaries had to be submitted within 1 week (due October 1, 2013) to be included in the grant agreement. The City sent in the two project summaries on October 1, 2013, one of which was the Perrinville Creek LID Retrofit Preliminary Design Project. This project Packet Page 129 of 182 dovetails with the ongoing Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Study. The other project submitted was the 105th/106th St. SW Drainage Improvements. The City received approval from Ecology on the project summaries on October 18, 2013 and received the final grant agreement on October 22, 2013. The grant was signed by the Mayor October 25, 2013 and by Ecology on November 12, 2013. The grant revenue of $50,000 will pay for the project. The total project budget is $50,000. The SW Edmonds-Connected Sumps on 238th St. to Hickman Park project The 2013 budget (put together in the last quarter of 2012) had $646,260 in spending authority for this project. At that time, the scope included upgrading the alley infiltration system south of 107th PL SW and a new drainage system on 238th St that would connect to the infiltration system built in Hickman Park in 2009. In the spring of 2013, the City was notified of a grant award for a walkway project on 238th St. At that point, it was decided that the walkway project and the stormwater project on 238th should be combined and would be put into the 2014 Transportation Capital budget. The stormwater-only project was then re-scoped (called Phase I) to include upgrading the alley infiltration system south of 107th PL SW plus the additional scope of the church infiltration system. When the 2014 budget was assembled in fall of 2013, it assumed $303,510 would be spent in 2013 and $89,290 in 2014. In 2013, only $36,499 of the $646,260 was expended to design the re-scoped project. This left $609,761 in unspent 2013 funds. This amendment is for Phase I and includes completing the in-house design and construction in 2014. This budget amendment requests $283,870 out of the remaining 2013 spending authority be rolled over into 2014. This will bring the spending authority for 2014 to $373,160. This amount will cover the cost to get to 100% design ($3,000) plus the updated construction cost ($343,160) plus $27,000 in staff time. Packet Page 130 of 182 Budget Amendment Narrative: Wellness Program: This program was established as part of our change in health care benefits. United Healthcare has strongly encouraged this and has been supporting our efforts because this type of program has been directly linked to lower health care costs, which impact the cost of premiums. . Council approved a budget amendment last year to establish a fund for this effort. Last year, HR managed the professional services very conservatively with the hope that we could use some of this to bolster the Wellness program. We do not have any dedicated budget established for this, and in order to be successful, we will need a small budget. It is for this reason we are requesting $10,000 from our year end savings to assist with this effort. Fitness Room Equipment: We have applied for and received a grant from Verdant Health Commission to upgrade the fitness room. The grant was approved and on January 21, 2014, Council approved an interlocal with Verdant Health Commission. This is just a request for expenditure authority. The revenue we receive from Verdant will cover all of the costs. Transfer for 132: This was identified in the Council budget process to add $200,000 to the Parks budget for future restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. Woodway Fields: This project will begin this year with the School District managing construction. The $155,000 was budgeted in the CIP last year and this amendment is to transfer this amount into the Parks Construction fund 132. In addition, there will be another transfer request at midyear for an additional $500,000 that was budgeted in the CIP this year. Edmonds Marsh Project: This is a carryover from last year as well. This amount will be used to contract with Earthcorps to manage the Marsh feasibility study, and for the Student Conservation Corps to provide youth workers to help in removal of invasive species from the Marsh this summer. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor: This is also a carryover from last year, and will be used to establish the Cultural Heritage tour on and around 4th avenue. Packet Page 131 of 182 Street Fund Position The Street Division of Public Works has, for over twenty years, been comprised of six Street Maintenance Workers, a Lead, and a half-time Supervisor. The labor cost (salaries, benefits, overtime, and standby) for this crew resides in Fund 111. The General Fund ceased making contributions to Fund 111 for street maintenance in the 2011 budget when the Edmonds TBD reached its peak funding level and the City’s tax revenues still had not begun to recover from the recession. Therefore, the only two funding sources for on-going street maintenance for 2011 and 2012 were TBD and gas tax. These funding sources are either a fixed income generator (TBD) or a declining-to-stable income source (gas tax). With expenses rising each year (labor, equipment, and supplies) and income stagnant or declining the Fund 111 cash balance was being eroded quickly. When an opening was created in the Street Division by an internal transfer a decision was made to not re-fill the vacancy until additional funding became available. In 2013 the General Fund committed $100,000 to Fund 111 to cover increases in direct operating expenses. In the 2014 approved budget an additional $300,000 was appropriated for a total of $400,000. One of the primary reasons why additional funds were requested was to bring the crew back to full strength. The funding is now available to do that and the need is clearly there as well. With an extended period of not funding pavement restoration the condition of our streets has declined and we need to spend more time on crack sealing, pothole repair, point repairs and other tasks. We have the funding but we need the FTE approved by Council so it can be filled. The long term budget projections show this funding continuing in 2015 and beyond. Packet Page 132 of 182 Swedish Hospital will be relocating and improving existing City water, sewer and stormwater utilities as part of their expansion project in 2014. Their project will relocate or add 2,760 feet of waterline, 260 feet of sewerline and 565 feet of stormwater utilities within the Swedish Hospital site. The City's Engineering Division is responsible for providing construction inspection on utility work related to private development. These inspections are typically completed with city staff. The size of Swedish Hospital's utility project and the required number of inspection hours is more than what can be provided by existing staff. If this amendment is not approved, the other options are to reduce the level of customer service provided by engineering staff on permit reviews and customer service at the permit counter or assign a Capital Projects Manager to complete the inspection work. The reduction in customer service would result in longer permit reviews for private and commercial developments and customer response time at the permit counter. Assigning a Capital Projects Manager to complete this work would delay progress to on-going capital improvement projects and studies. It would also require increase staff costs to the General Fund since the Capital Projects Manager position is funded by Utility, Street and Grant funding related to capital improvement projects. This amendment will provide $47,950 of additional funding to hire a consultant to complete the required inspections. The cost for these services will be offset by new permit revenue collected from Swedish Hospital that was not included in the 2014 Budget. Packet Page 133 of 182 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3949 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2014 Budget; and WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 3949 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2014 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E adopted herein by reference. Section 2. Council authorizes the Administrative Services Director the authority to establish a new debt service fund – Fund 232 - 2014 Debt Service Fund. Packet Page 134 of 182 2 Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting o f the title. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY ___ JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 135 of 182 3 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2014, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3949 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2014. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Page 136 of 182 EXHIBIT “A”: Budget Amendments by Revenue (March 2014) 4 ORD. NO. ORD. NO.2014 FUND FUND 3949 Amended NO.DESCRIPTION 12/3/2013 Mar-14 Budget 001 General Fund 36,154,919$ 2,850,778$ 39,005,697$ 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 594,946 - 594,946 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 903,858 - 903,858 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 527,115 - 527,115 013 Multimodal Transportation Fd.- - - 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 8,000 - 8,000 016 Building Maintenance 679,800 - 679,800 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 20,075 - 20,075 111 Street Fund 1,712,100 - 1,712,100 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 9,121,607 40,000 9,161,607 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 91,473 - 91,473 118 Memorial Street Tree 25 - 25 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 54,140 - 54,140 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 20,308 - 20,308 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,623 - 1,623 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 18,200 - 18,200 125 Park Acq/Improvement 904,343 - 904,343 126 Special Capital Fund 904,243 - 904,243 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 43,708 - 43,708 129 Special Projects Fund 4,000 - 4,000 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 160,136 - 160,136 132 Parks Construction 1,340,000 200,000 1,540,000 136 Parks Trust Fund 186 - 186 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd 12,970 - 12,970 138 Sister City Commission 4,519 - 4,519 139 Transportation Benefit District 645,000 - 645,000 140 Business Improvement District - - - 211 Lid Fund Control 28,600 - 28,600 213 Lid Guaranty Fund 28,626 - 28,626 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 1,022,689 - 1,022,689 232 2014 Debt Service Fund - 966,286 966,286 234 Ltgo Bond Debt Service Fund - - - 421 Water 6,241,818 7,778 6,249,596 422 Storm 3,530,158 100,000 3,630,158 423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 8,347,200 - 8,347,200 424 Bond Reserve Fund 840,816 - 840,816 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,478,108 - 1,478,108 617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 174,379 (129,000) 45,379 Totals 75,619,688$ 4,035,842$ 79,655,530$ Packet Page 137 of 182 EXHIBIT “B”: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (March 2014) 5 ORD. NO. ORD. NO.2014 FUND FUND 3949 Amended NO.DESCRIPTION 12/3/2013 Mar-14 Budget 001 General Fund 38,034,671$ 2,983,252$ 41,017,923$ 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 503,361 - 503,361 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 300,000 - 300,000 012 Contingency Reserve Fund - - - 013 Multimodal Transportation Fd.- - - 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 8,000 - 8,000 016 Building Maintenance 720,200 - 720,200 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 81,033 - 81,033 111 Street Fund 1,595,810 63,000 1,658,810 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 9,488,866 73,000 9,561,866 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 152,575 - 152,575 118 Memorial Street Tree - - - 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 54,000 - 54,000 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,786 - 26,786 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 3,600 - 3,600 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 19,000 - 19,000 125 Park Acq/Improvement 1,377,712 205,000 1,582,712 126 Special Capital Fund 1,189,291 - 1,189,291 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 18,200 - 18,200 129 Special Projects Fund 4,000 - 4,000 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 175,435 - 175,435 132 Parks Construction 2,494,000 (205,000) 2,289,000 136 Parks Trust Fund - - - 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd - - - 138 Sister City Commission 4,500 - 4,500 139 Transportation Benefit District 645,000 - 645,000 140 Business Improvement District - - - 211 Lid Fund Control 28,600 - 28,600 213 Lid Guaranty Fund - - - 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 1,022,690 - 1,022,690 232 2014 Debt Service Fund - 966,286 966,286 234 Ltgo Bond Debt Service Fund - - - 421 Water 9,470,504 159,620 9,630,124 422 Storm 5,931,306 639,907 6,571,213 423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 13,915,053 831,346 14,746,399 424 Bond Reserve Fund 840,816 - 840,816 511 Equipment Rental Fund 979,579 113,700 1,093,279 617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 89,615 - 89,615 Totals 89,174,203$ 5,830,111$ 95,004,314$ Packet Page 138 of 182 EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendment (March 2014) 6 Fund BARS Category Debit Credit Description Carry Forwards from 2013 General Fund 001 000 41 565 50 49 00 Short Term Housing 660 General Fund 001 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 660 General Fund 001 000 61 557 20 41 00 Professional Services 3,924 General Fund 001 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 3,924 General Fund 001 000 62 524 10 41 00 Professional Services 55,000 General Fund 001 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 55,000 General Fund 001 000 62 524 20 41 00 Professional Services 60,000 General Fund 001 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 60,000 General Fund 001 000 64 571 23 35 00 Small Equipment 887 General Fund 001 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 887 Water Utility 421 000 74 534 80 64 00 Equipment 49,849 Water Utility 421 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 49,849 Water Utility 421 000 74 534 80 64 00 Equipment 14,661 Water Utility 421 000 74 534 80 34 30 Meter Inventory 3,206 Water Utility 421 000 74 534 80 34 20 Water Parts Inventory 15,610 Water Utility 421 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 33,477 Equipment Rental 511 100 77 594 48 64 00 Equipment 69,000 Equipment Rental 511 100 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 69,000 Equipment Rental 511 100 77 594 48 64 00 Equipment 15,000 Equipment Rental 511 100 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 15,000 Street Construction 112 200 68 595 33 65 00 Construction 13,000 Street Construction 112 200 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 13,000 Street Construction 112 200 68 595 33 65 00 Construction 40,000 Street Construction 112 200 68 595 33 91 00 Interfund Services 20,000 Street Construction 112 200 Grant # to be assigned 40,000 Street Construction 112 200 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 20,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 65 30 Construction 65,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 91 30 Interfund Services 10,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 75,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 65 30 Construction 367,900 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 91 30 Interfund Services 20,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 41 30 Professional Services 30,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 417,900 Water Utility 421 000 74 594 34 65 10 Construction 16,300 Water Utility 421 000 74 594 34 91 10 Interfund Services 9,994 Water Utility 421 000 337 10 000 00 Interlocal from Lynnwood 7,778 Water Utility 421 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 18,516 Water Utility 421 000 74 594 34 65 10 Construction 35,000 Water Utility 421 000 74 594 34 91 10 Interfund Services 15,000 Water Utility 421 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 50,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 41 20 Professional Services 8,200 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 91 20 Interfund Services 1,800 Stormwater Utility 422 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 10,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 41 20 Professional Services 42,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 65 20 Construction 40,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 308 00 000 00 Beginning Fund Balance 82,000 Allocate Ins. Money from 2013 to 2014 North Stream Pipe Abandonment-Puget Drive City-wide Drainage Replacement Meter Reading Equipment Domestic Violence Victim Housing Discovery Program Laptop Code Re- organization Building Prof. Services E-Z Valve Installation Equip. Frontier EG Grant Reallocate B-fund from 2013 to 2014 2013 CIPP Rehabilitation 2012 SS Replacement Project 76th Ave Waterline Replacement 2013 WL Replacement 7th Avenue Sidewalk ADA Curb Ramp Upgrade along 3rd Avenue Packet Page 139 of 182 EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendment (March 2014) 7 Department BARS Category Debit Credit New Budget Amendments General Fund 001 000 22 521 10 41 00 Professional Services 10,000 General Fund 001 000 39 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 10,000 General Fund 001 000 23 512 50 11 00 Salaries 51,927 General Fund 001 000 23 523 30 11 00 Salaries 51,927 General Fund 001 000 23 512 50 23 00 Benefits 29,916 General Fund 001 000 23 523 30 23 00 Benefits 29,916 General Fund 001 000 64 571 022 35 00 Small Equipment 23,792 General Fund 001 000 64 571 22 64 00 Equipment 15,721 General Fund 001 000 337 20 000 00 Verdant Interlocal 39,513 General Fund 001 000 66 518 30 11 00 Salaries 1,242 General Fund 001 000 66 518 30 23 00 Benefits 761 General Fund 001 000 39 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 2,003 General Fund 001 000 67 532 20 41 00 Professional Services 47,950 General Fund 001 000 341 82 000 00 Engr Fees and Charges 47,950 General Fund 001 000 39 591 21 71 11 Principal Payment 1,865,000 General Fund 001 000 39 592 21 83 11 Interest Payment 67,971 General Fund 001 000 39 597 21 55 32 Interfund Transfer 19,982 General Fund 001 000 39 597 21 55 32 Interfund Transfer 946,304 General Fund 001 000 393 00 000 00 Proceeds of Refunding 2,763,315 2014 Debt Serv Fund 232 000 39 592 21 84 00 Debt Service Costs 19,982 2014 Debt Serv Fund 232 000 39 591 21 77 00 Principal Payment 923,199 2014 Debt Serv Fund 232 000 39 592 21 83 00 Interest Payment 23,105 2014 Debt Serv Fund 232 000 397 21 001 00 Interfund Transfer 966,286 Street Fund 111 000 68 542 31 11 00 Salaries 35,000 Street Fund 111 000 68 542 31 23 00 Benefits 25,000 Street Fund 111 000 68 542 31 12 00 Overtime 3,000 Street Fund 111 000 68 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 63,000 Parks Construction 132 000 397 76 001 00 Interfund Transfer 200,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 508 030 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 200,000 Firemen's Pension 617 000 397 17 001 00 Interfund Transfer 129,000 Firemen's Pension 617 000 51 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 129,000 Equipment Rental 511 100 77 594 48 64 00 Equipment 29,700 Equipment Rental 511 100 77 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 29,700 REET 2 125 000 64 594 76 41 90 Prof Serv to Other Fund 155,000 REET 2 125 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 155,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 594 76 41 91 Prof Serv from other fund 155,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 155,000 REET 2 125 000 64 594 76 41 90 Prof Serv to Other Fund 25,000 REET 2 125 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 594 76 41 91 Prof Serv from other fund 25,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,000 REET 2 125 000 64 594 76 41 90 Prof Serv to Other Fund 25,000 REET 2 125 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 594 76 41 91 Prof Serv from other fund 25,000 Parks Construction 132 000 64 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,000 2003 UTGO Refunding Eliminate transfer into Fund 617 Asst Police Chief Vehicle Constr Inspection Swedish Hospital Woodway Fields Edmonds Marsh Project 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project Fitness Room Equipment Facilities Salary/Benefit Adjustment Re-instatement of vacated street position Change from office to probation budget Add transfer into Fund 132 Wellness Program Packet Page 140 of 182 EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendment (March 2014) 8 Department BARS Category Debit Credit New Budget Amendments Continued Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 65 30 Construction 838,446 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 65 30 Construction 464,600 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 41 30 Professional Services 15,000 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 594 35 91 30 Interfund Services 20,400 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 508 000 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 338,446 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 41 20 Professional Services 47,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 91 20 Interfund Services 3,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 334 003 102 20 Grant 50,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 41 20 Professional Services 81,900 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 91 20 Interfund Services 3,100 Stormwater Utility 422 000 334 03 102 20 Grant 50,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 35,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 41 20 Professional Services 128,037 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 128,037 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 031 65 20 Construction 257,870 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 594 31 91 20 Interfund Services 27,000 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 284,870 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Connected Sumps on 238th St to Hickman Park 2013 SS Replacement Project 105th/106th ST SW Drainage Improvements Perrinville Creek High Flow Mgmt Project Packet Page 141 of 182 EXHIBIT “D”: Budget Amendment Summary (March 2014) 9 Fund Number Change in Beginning Fund Balance Revenue Expense Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 120,471 2,850,778 2,983,252 (12,003) 111 - 63,000 (63,000) 112 33,000 40,000 73,000 - 125 - 205,000 (205,000) 132 - 200,000 (205,000) 405,000 232 - 966,286 966,286 - 421 151,842 7,778 159,620 - 422 92,000 100,000 639,907 (447,907) 423 492,900 831,346 (338,446) 511 84,000 - 113,700 (29,700) 617 - (129,000) - (129,000) Total Change 974,213 4,035,842 5,830,111 (820,056) Packet Page 142 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 10 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Short Term DV Housing 001.000.41.565.50.49.00 660 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)660$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.308.00.00.00 (660) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (660)$ ACOP James Lawless Edmonds Police Department Domestic Violence Victim Housing In late December 2012, North Sound Church donated $1,000 to Edmonds Police Department to be used for short term housing for domestic violence victims. In 2013 the Police Department's Domestic Violence Coordinator twice used the funds to arrange housing for victims in crisis. As only $340 of the $1,000 was spent in 2013, the remaining $660 needs to be budgeted in 2014, financed by fund balance. Packet Page 143 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 11 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Prof Svcs 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 3,924 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)3,924$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.308.00.000.00 (3,924) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (3,924)$ Cindi Cruz Community Services Frontier EG Grant The City of Edmonds received $10,000 as part of the Verizon Franchise Agreement in 2008. To date there has been a total of $6,076.10 spent resulting in a balance of $3,923.90. The request is to carry forward this amount into 2014 to be spent as part of upgrades to the video recording system in the City Council Chambers. Packet Page 144 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 12 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 Dev Svcs / Admin Prof Services 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 55,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)55,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.308.00.000.00 (55,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (55,000)$ Rob Chave Development Services Code Re-organization Budget The Council budgeted $75,000 in 2013 and another $75,000 in 2014 for the code reorganization project. Of the 2013 budget, $40,000 was earmarked for legal review of the development code, and the balance was to be used for code work (primarily in improving the presentation and online accessibility of the codes). Of the total budgeted amount, $20,000 was spent in 2013 on the legal review; the balance of the work has continued and will be completed in the first half of 2014. The online work (primarily to be accomplished by Code Publishing) can be initiated soon, but the bulk of that work will need to wait for a more complete code draft, which will happen at the end of this year (2014). The purpose of this budget amendment is to consolidate the unexpended funds budgeted in 2013 ($55,000) with the $75,000 budgeted for the project in 2014. With the $55,000 carried forward from 2013, the total amount allocated for the code reorganization in 2014 will be $130,000. This will be a high priority for the new Development Services Director. Packet Page 145 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 13 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 Dev Svcs / Building Prof Services 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 60,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)60,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.308.00.000.00 (60,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (60,000)$ Rob Chave Development Services Building Professional Services 2013 revenue from building permit and review fees exceeded budget estimates by over $150,000. This unexpected revenue windfall served to increase the beginning fund balance going into 2014. At the same time, building review and permit activity is at a very high level, especially at this early point in the year. We are already behind in our review times, and there are a number of very important projects that need to be permitted in a timely manner (an example is the hospital expansion). Our proposal is to address the permitting backlog by engaging in more outside reviews (i.e. contracting for outside plan review services). By using some of the unanticipated additional revenue from permitting activity in 2013, this will enable us to address the current plan review needs without hiring additional in -house staff. Hopefully the amount requested will carry us through the current high volume of permit activity. Packet Page 146 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 14 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Minor Equipment 001.000.64.571.23.35.00 887 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)887$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.308.00.000.00 (887) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (887)$ Renee McRae Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Discovery Programs Laptop At the time the 2014 budget was prepared, we did not anticipate the need for a new laptop for the Discovery Programs. In late 2013, the Hubbard Family Foundation awarded the Discovery Programs with $887 for a new laptop. On January 15, 2014, IT ordered the new laptop. This amendment is requesting budget appropriation in the amount of $887 to the Discovery Program's minor equipment line. Packet Page 147 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 15 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Equipment 421.000.74.534.80.64.00 49,849 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)49,849$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility 421.000.308.00.000.00 (49,849) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (49,849)$ Jim Waite Water E-Z Valve Installation Machine The E-Z Valve was budgeted in 2013 and ordered in 2013. The machine did not get delivered until 2014. Please move the budget appropriation for the E -Z Valve from the 2013 budget to the 2014 budget. Packet Page 148 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 16 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Equipment 421.000.74.534.80.64.00 14,661 421 Water Utility Meter Inventory 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 3,206 421 Water Utility Water Parts Inv. 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 15,610 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)33,477$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility 421.000.308.00.000.00 (33,477) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (33,477)$ Jim Waite Water Meter Reading Equipment The water meter reading equipment was budgeted in 2013 and ordered in 2013. The equipment did not get delivered until 2014. Please move the budget appropriation for the Meter Reading Equipment from the 2013 budget to the 2014 budget. Packet Page 149 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 17 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment Rental Equipment 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 69,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)69,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment Rental 511.100.308.00.000.00 (69,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (69,000)$ Mike Adams Fleet Maintenance Reallocate B-Fund monies from 2013 to 2014 The replacement vehicle for Unit #21-SWR was ordered in October of 2013 and included in the 2013 budget appropriation. The vehicle was not received until January of 2014. Budget appropriation needs to be reallocated from the 2013 equipment budget to the 2014 equipment budget in the amount of $69,000. The vehicle is part of the B -Fund replacement program. Packet Page 150 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 18 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment Rental Equipment 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 15,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)15,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment Rental 511.100.308.00.000.00 (15,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (15,000)$ Mike Adams Fleet Maintenance Allocate Insurance Money from 2013 to 2014 When submitting the 2014 budget, the Fleet Manager did not realize the insurance proceeds received in 2013 needed to be carried forward as part of the budget process. A budget appropriation in the amount of $15,000 is needed to replace a wrecked vehicle that received insurance proceeds in 2013. $13,000 of the vehicle costs were included in the 2014 budget for the replacement of Unit # 411-POL for a total of $28,000. This vehicle is part of the B - Fund replacement program. Packet Page 151 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 19 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 112 Street Const Fund Const 112.200.68.595.33.65.00 13,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)13,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 112 Street Const Fund 112.100.308.00.000.00 (13,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (13,000)$ Rob English Public Works 7th Avenue Sidewalk In 2013, a budget amendment was approved for $15,100 to construct 104 feet of new sidewalk, curb and gutter and a pedestrian curb ramp. The property owner at 220th 7th Ave agreed to contribute approximately $3,000 to build the new sidewalk with the City paying for the curb and gutter replacement and the pedestrian curb ramp. The project was advertised for construction bids in fall 2013 and the bids received were too high. The City agreed to rebid the project and the property owner decided to hire his own private contractor to build the sidewalk. The City received the low bid of $12,450 in December 2013 to build its portion of the project and construction started in January 2014. This amendment will program $13,000 into the 2014 Budget to pay for the completed work. Packet Page 152 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 20 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 112 Street Construction Fund Construction 112.200.68.595.33.65.00 40,000 112 Street Construction Fund Interfund Services 112.200.68.595.33.91.00 20,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)60,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 112 Street Construction Fund Grant (40,000) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (40,000)$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 112 Street Construction Fund 112.100.308.00.000.00 (20,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (20,000)$ Rob English Public Works ADA Curb Ramp Upgrade along 3rd Avenue In 2013, the City secured a grant for $50,000 for the upgrade of ADA curb ramps along 3rd Ave. W from Main St. to Pine St. In January 2014, the City secured an additional $40,000 in grant funding for this project. This amendment will program $60,000 of additional budget authority in 2014. The costs will be offset by the $40,000 grant and $20,000 of unspent 2013 funds for this project. Packet Page 153 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 21 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund Construction 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 65,000 423 Sewer Utility Fund Interfund Services 423.000.75.594.35.91.30 10,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)75,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund 423.000.308.00.000.00 (75,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (75,000)$ Rob English Public Works Department 2013 CIPP Rehabilitation The 2013 amended budget included $220,778 for this project and the actual expenditure was $117,412. This amendment will program $75,000 of unspent 2013 funds to the 2014 Budget to complete the remaining construction work and close -out the project. Packet Page 154 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 22 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund Construction 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 367,900 423 Sewer Utility Fund Interfund Svcs 423.000.75.594.35.91.30 20,000 423 Sewer Utility Fund Professional Svcs 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 30,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)417,900$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund Begin Fund Bal 423.000.308.00.000.00 (417,900) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (417,900)$ Rob English Public Works 2012 SS Replacement Project This amendment will provide additional sewer utility funds for the 2012 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. The amendment will program unspent funds from 2013 and ending fund balance funds to match the current budget needed to complete the project. Packet Page 155 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 23 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Fund Construction 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 16,300 421 Water Utility Fund Interfund Services 421.000.74.594.34.91.10 9,994 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)26,294$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Fund Lynnwood 421.000.337.10.000.00 (7,778) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (7,778)$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Fund 421.000.308.00.000.00 (18,516) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (18,516)$ Rob English Public Works 76th Ave Waterline Replacement The amendment will provide additional water utility funds for the 76th Ave project. The project is currently in the final payment and closeout phase. This amendment will program unspent funds from 2013 to complete the closeout process. Packet Page 156 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 24 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Fund Construction 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 35,000 421 Water Utility Fund Interfund Services 421.000.74.594.34.91.10 15,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)50,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 421 Water Utility Fund 421.000.308.00.000.00 (50,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (50,000)$ Rob English Public Works 2013 WL Replacement The 2013 amended budget included $1,574,720 for this project and the actual expenditure was $1,425,292. This amendment will program $50,000 of unspent 2013 funds to the 2014 Budget to complete the remaining construction work and close -out the project. Packet Page 157 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 25 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Professional Serv. 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 8,200 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Interfund Services 422.000.72.594.31.91.20 1,800 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)10,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Begin Fund Balance 422.000.308.00.000.00 (10,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (10,000)$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering North Stream Pipe Abandonment-Puget Dr The Northstream Pipe Abandonment Project could not be completed in 2013 due to staff priorities and workload. The 2013 budget for this study was $10,000 and this amendment will program the unspent 2013 funds into the 2014 Budget. Packet Page 158 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 26 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Professional Serv 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 42,000 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Construction 422.000.72.594.31.65.20 40,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)82,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Begin Fund Balance 422.000.308.00.000.00 (82,000) Total Beginning Fund Balance (Increase) Decrease (82,000)$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering City-wide Drainage Replacement City-Wide Drainage Replacement, Extension: Annually, the Stormwater Capital Fund has this project as a line item . This item is used to solve emerging stormwater issues and results in one or more projects. In late August and early September 2013, we had several large storm events that exposed some weakness in the City's stormwater management system. Since these storms occurred towards the end of the year, the projects will extend into 2014. For 2014 this includes the North Shellbarger Basin Improvements and the Northstream Inlet Improvements. The 2013 budget for this project was $149,000 and this amendment will program $82,000 of the unspent 2013 funds into the 2014 Budget. Packet Page 159 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 27 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Professional Services 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 10,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)10,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 (10,000) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(10,000)$ Mary Ann Hardie Human Resources Wellness Program These funds will be used toward the development of the City's Wellness program (promoted through the City's Wellness Committee) to include an incentive program for employees to encourage them to create, maintain and improve health through the Wellness program's various nutrition, education and fitness activities . The Wellness program may include guest speaker costs, materials costs as well as small incentives for completing fitness goals (such as t-shirts, water bottles, etc.). The net impact of a wellness program would be to have healthier, productive employees with less stress and health issues, to lower lost work days and potentially lower L & I injury costs and medical insurance utilization costs (which affect our bottom line premium costs). The 2013 ending fund balance in the HR professional services line item was $48,000. We propose to use $10,000 of this to fund the Wellness program for 2014. Packet Page 160 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 28 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Salary 001.000.23.512.50.11.00 (51,927) 001 General Salary 001.000.23.523.30.11.00 51,927 001 General Benefit 001.000.23.512.50.23.00 (29,916) 001 General Benefit 001.000.23.523.30.23.00 29,916 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Joan Ferebee Edmonds Municipal Court Change from office to probation budget The salary and benefit for one court clerk is to be changed from the office administration to probation. This will decrease the office administrative budget by $81,843 and increase the probation budget by $81,843. The effective date is 1/1/2014. Packet Page 161 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 29 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Small Equipment 001.000.64.571.22.35.00 23,792 001 General Fund Equipment 001.000.64.571.22.64.00 15,721 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)39,513$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Verdant Interlocal 001.000.337.20.000.00 (39,513) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (39,513)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Renee McRae Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Dept Fitness Room Equipment Late last year, we submitted a Building Healthy Communities Fund grant application to the Verdant Health Commission to upgrade our fitness room equipment. The grant was approved, and on January 21, 2014, City Council approved the Interlocal Agreement allowing us to accept the funds and move forward with the purchase of the equipment and the development of programming to help seniors to live healthy and active lives. This amendment is requesting budget appropriation in the amount of $23,792 to the Recreation minor equipment line and $15,720 to the Recreation equipment line. Packet Page 162 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 30 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Salary 001.000.66.518.30.11.00 1,242 001 General Fund Benefits 001.000.66.518.30.23.00 761 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)2,003$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 (2,003) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(2,003)$ Jim Stevens Facilities Maintenance Salary/Benefit Adjustment Pursuant to the Teamsters CBA Section A.1.2.1 employees of the Public Works Department Facilities Maintenance Division shall receive a 2% wage premium on days they are assigned to work in restricted areas of the Edmonds Police Department because of the necessity of passing a fingerprint-based background check. Originally this only applied to custodial staff working unsupervised inside the police department. Too late for inclusion in the 2014 budget process, the police determined this requirement extended to any employees with keys to access secure areas. This meant the premium would also extend to the four maintenance crew in Facilities Maintenance for shifts in which they worked in these areas. An examination of the work records for the previous year has shown that one shift of every four, on average, is worked inside the police department. So, the fiscal impact of this wage premium (2%)needs to be included as a 0.5% adjustment to both the hourly rates and the benefit rates of these employees. This is the reaon for adjustment to the 2014 budget requested here. Packet Page 163 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 31 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Professional Serv 001.000.67.532.20.41.00 47,950 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)47,950$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Engr Fees and Charg 001.000.341.82.000.00 (47,950) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (47,950)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Rob English Public Works Constr Inspection -Swedish Hospital Utilities Swedish Hospital will be relocating and improving existing City water, sewer and stormwater utilities as part of their expansion project in 2014. Their project will relocate or add 2,760 feet of waterline, 260 feet of sewerline and 565 feet of stormwater utilities within the Swedish Hospital site. The City's Engineering Division is responsible for providing construction inspection on utility work related to private development. These inspections are typically completed with city staff. The size of Swedish Hospital's utility project and the required number of inspection hours is more than what can be provided by existing staff. This amendment will provide $47,950 of additional funding to hire a consultant to complete the required inspections. The cost for these services will be offset by permit revenue collected from Swedish Hosptial. Packet Page 164 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 32 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Principal Pymt 001.000.39.591.21.71.11 1,865,000 001 General Fund Interest Pymt 001.000.39.592.21.83.11 (67,971) 001 General Fund Transfer 001.000.39.597.21.55.32 19,982 232 2014 Debt Service Fund Debt Service Costs 232.000.39.592.21.84.00 19,982 001 General Fund Transfer 001.000.39.597.21.55.32 946,304 232 2014 Debt Service Fund Principal Pymt 232.000.39.591.21.77.00 923,199 232 2014 Debt Service Fund Interest Pymt 232.000.39.592.21.83.00 23,105 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)3,729,601$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Proceeds of Refund 001.000.393.00.000.00 (2,763,315) 232 2014 Debt Service Fund Transfer 232.000.397.21.001.00 (966,286) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (3,729,601)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Deb Sharp Finance 2003 UTGO Refunding In January 2014 the City refunded the 2003 UTGO bond. This amendment increases the budget appropriation in the General Fund to payoff the existing 2003 UTGO debt service which totals $2,743,333. The amendment also transfers the new debt service costs to the newly created Fund 232 (2014 Debt Service Fund) and gives budget appropriation for the 2014 debt service principal and interest payment and the 2014 debt service costs. Packet Page 165 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 33 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 111 Street Fund Salaries 111.000.68.542.31.11.00 35,000 111 Street Fund Benefits 111.000.68.542.31.23.00 25,000 111 Street Fund Overtime 111.000.68.542.31.12.00 3,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)63,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 111 Street Fund 111.000.68.508.00.00.00 (63,000) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(63,000)$ Tod Moles Street Department, Public Works Re-instatement of vacated position The street department wishes to re -instate a FTE position that was lost due to an employee transfer back in March, 2010. The loss of manpower and the increase in daily surface repairs (pot holes, crack sealing, vegetation control) has left the division struggling to keep up with day to day maintenance needs. Packet Page 166 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 34 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 132 Parks Construction Transfer 132.000.397.76.001.00 (200,000) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (200,000)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 132 Parks Construction 132.000.64.508.30.00.00 200,000 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)200,000$ Debra Sharp Finance Add Transfer into Fund 132 During the 2014 budget process, the Council made a motion to reserve $200K for the Marsh Restoration. There was budget added for the transfer out of the General Fund into Fund 132 (Parks Construction Fund) but the other side of the transaction was not budgeted. A budget amendment is needed to transfer the funds into Fund 132. Packet Page 167 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 35 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 617 Firemen's Pension Transfer 617.000.397.17.001.00 129,000 Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease 129,000$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 617 Firemen's Pension 617.000.51.508.00.00.00 (129,000) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(129,000)$ Debra Sharp Finance Eliminate Transfer into Fund 617 During the 2014 budget process, the Council eliminated the transfer from the General Fund to Fund 617 (Firemen's Pension Fund). Along with eliminating the transfer from the General Fund, an amendment is needed to eliminate the transfer into Fund 617. Packet Page 168 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 36 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment-Rental Equipment 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 29,700 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)29,700$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 511 Equipment Rental 511.100.77.508.00.00.00 (29,700) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(29,700)$ Mike Adams Fleet Maintenance Replacement Vehicle for Asst Police Chief In July 2012 Assistant Police Chief Gerry Gannon retired and the job position was not filled. His vehicle was used to replace a detective's vehicle, unit #251-POL, that was surplused. The replacement funds for unit #251-POL remain in the B-Fund reserve. During the 2014 budget process , Council approved filling the second Assistant Police Chief position. Budget appropriation is needed in the amount of $29,700 to purchase a new assistant police chief vehicle. The funds are in the B -Fund reserve and will come from ending fund balance. Packet Page 169 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 37 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 PS To Other Fund 125.000.64.594.76.41.90 155,000 132 Parks Construction PS from Other Fund 132.000.64.594.76.41.91 (155,000) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 125.000.64.508.00.00.00 (155,000) 132 Parks Construction Fund 132.000.64.508.00.00.00 155,000 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Sarah Sherman Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Woodway Fields Moving funds collected in 2012 and 2013 from the Real Estate Excise Tax 2, Parks and Recreation to the 2014 Parks Construction fund for the Woodway Field Project to be expended in 2014 on the first phase of improvements to the fields. Packet Page 170 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 38 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 PS To Other Fund 125.000.64.594.76.41.90 25,000 132 Parks Construction PS from Other Fund 132.000.64.594.76.41.91 (25,000) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 125.000.64.508.00.00.00 (25,000) 132 Parks Construction Fund 132.000.64.508.00.00.00 25,000 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Sarah Sherman Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Edmonds Marsh Project Moving funds collected in 2012 and 2013 from the Real Estate Excise Tax 2, Parks and Recreation to the 2014 Parks Construction fund for the Edmonds Marsh Project to be expended in 2014. Packet Page 171 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 39 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 PS To Other Fund 125.000.64.594.76.41.90 25,000 132 Parks Construction PS from Other Fund 132.000.64.594.76.41.91 (25,000) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 125 REET 2 125.000.64.508.00.00.00 (25,000) 132 Parks Construction Fund 132.000.64.508.00.00.00 25,000 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Sarah Sherman Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Project Moving funds collected in 2012 and 2013 from the Real Estate Excise Tax 2, Parks and Recreation to the 2014 Parks Construction fund for the Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Project to be expended in 2014. Packet Page 172 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 40 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund Construction 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 838,446 423 Sewer Utility Fund Construction 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 (464,600) 423 Sewer Utility Fund Professional Svcs 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 (15,000) 423 Sewer Utility Fund Interfund Svcs 423.000.75.594.35.91.30 (20,400) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)338,446$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Change in Fund Balance Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 423 Sewer Utility Fund Beg Fund Balance 423.000.308.00.000.00 (38,466) 423 Sewer Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 (300,000) Change in Fund Balance (338,466)$ Rob English Public Works 2013 SS Replacement Project This amendment will provide additional sewer utility funds for the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. The amendment will program unspent funds from 2013, $300,000 in bond proceeds and transfer $500,000 in funds from the Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab project which had $529,600. Packet Page 173 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 41 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Capital Professional Serv 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 47,000 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Interfund Services 422.000.72.594.31.91.20 3,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)50,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Capital Grant 422.000.334.03.102.20 (50,000) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (50,000)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering Perrinville Creek High Flow Management Project The Perrinville Creek LID Retrofit Preliminary Design Project is funded by a grant from the Department of Ecology received in the fall of 2013 and it did not get into the 2014 budget. The grant revenue of $50,000 will pay for the project. The total project budget is $50,000. Packet Page 174 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 42 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Professional Serv 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 81,900 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Interfund Services 422.000.72.594.31.91.20 3,100 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)85,000$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Grant 422.000.334.03.102.20 (50,000) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (50,000)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 (35,000) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(35,000)$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering 105th/106th St. SW Drainage Improvements This project was in the 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (SW Edmonds Study Project 4). Interim fixes provided relief to residents on a short term basis. Grant funds from the Department of Ecology were made available for a low impact development solution. The project will infiltrate the majority of storm water run -off from this 10 acre neighborhood. Packet Page 175 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 43 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Professional Serv 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 128,037 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)128,037$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Stormwater Capital Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 (128,037) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(128,037)$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Retrofit The Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study : The original 2013 budget for this project was $200,000. The Department of Ecology sent out a grant notice in early 2013 for conducting stormwater retrofit planning and pre -Design.Ecology’s goal for this grant funding is to develop a list of projects to fund design and construction for the 2015 legislative session. The City sent in a grant proposal on April 5, 2013 to expand its current flow reduction study to include flow monitoring and a pre -design report. On April 30, 2013, Ecology notified the City that our grant proposal had been selected for funding at the amount of $188,722. This amendment requests the unspent amount from the original 2013 spending authority ($112,037) be moved into the 2014 budget.An additional $16,000 in spending authority is also requested to make up the difference in what was in 2014 budget for the grant amount ($172,772) and the actual grant amount ($188,772).The $112,037 from 2013 plus the $16,000 difference between what was programmed for the grant and the actual grant equals $128,037 in this amendment. This amendment plus the $172,772 originally approved for this project in the 2014 budget will take the project to its spending authority of $300,809 for 2014. Packet Page 176 of 182 EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (March 2014) 44 Prepared By: Department: Description on Budget Amendment Summary: Budget Amendment Detailed Description: Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Construction 422.000.72.594.31.65.20 257,870 422 Stormwater Utility Fund Interfund Services 422.000.72.594.31.91.20 27,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)284,870$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 422 Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount 422 Stormwater Utility Fund 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 (284,870) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(284,870)$ Jerry Shuster Public Works - Engineering Connected Sumps on 238th St. to Hickman Park The SW Edmonds -Connected Sumps on 238th St. to Hickman Park project has been separated into two phases in the 2014 Budget. The first phase is the Infiltration project behing the church and the installation of storwater injection well in the alley behind 17th PL SW. The second phase is the drainage improvements that will be built with the 238th St. sidewalk project. This amendment is for Phase I and includes completing the design in -house and construction. The extent of the project was not known in the fall of 2013 and a place holder budget of $89,290 was included in the 2014 budget. The total cost to get to 100% design is $3,000 and constuction is now estimated at $343,160 + $27,000 in staff time. The difference, $280,870 can be paid for by the stormwater utility fund . Packet Page 177 of 182 AM-6680 10. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/25/2014 Time:10 Minutes Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Information Information Subject Title Traffic Impact Fee Annual Report Recommendation For information only. Previous Council Action On March 11, 2014, the Parks, Planning and Public Works committee reviewed this item and recommended it be presented to full Council at a future Council meeting. Narrative In 2004, the City authorized the collection of Traffic Impact Fees to help pay for transportation projects that are needed to serve new growth and development. Pursuant to Section 18.82.080(C) of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), Attachment 1 is an accounting of the Traffic Impact Fee Fund for the year ending December 31, 2013. The City collected a total of $156,463.10 in traffic impact fees and interest of $188.79 during 2013. These revenues combined with the 2013 beginning fund balance of $347,127 resulted in total available funding of $503,779. On the expense side and in accordance with section 18.82.100 of the ECDC, the traffic impact fee fund paid $41,498 for the annual debt service to the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) for the 220th Street SW Improvements Project. The traffic impact fee fund also paid $76,083.72 for the Five Corners Roundabout project. The remaining balance of $386,197, plus impact fees collected in 2014, will be used to make the 2014 debt service payment ($41,497) on the 220th Street SW project and contribute towards the required local match for the Five Corners Roundabout and 76th/212 improvement projects. Attachments 2013 Traffic Impact Fee Report Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Megan Luttrell 03/20/2014 04:05 PM Public Works Kody McConnell 03/20/2014 04:08 PM City Clerk Linda Hynd 03/20/2014 04:08 PM Packet Page 178 of 182 Mayor Dave Earling 03/20/2014 08:40 PM Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/21/2014 08:30 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 03/12/2014 03:59 PM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2014 Packet Page 179 of 182 2013 Page 1 2013 Applicant Site Address Bus. License Bldg Permit Fund Name Reference Transferred Total Beginning Balance $347,126.62 1/2/13 BLD20120673 REC056885 GRE Edmonds Way Specialty Retail General Office TI X $2,800.99 23020 Edmonds Way $349,927.61 1/28/13 BLD20120790 REC057012 Ardsley Homes Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 21718 85th Pl W $351,123.94 2/28/13 BLD20130020 REC057197 Belton Homes Vacant Lot SFR vested to old plat X $840.72 21917 78th Pl W $351,964.66 2/28/13 BLD20130019 REC057200 Belton Homes Vacant Lot SFR vested to old plat X $840.72 21915 78th Pl W $352,805.38 3/12/13 BLD20120164 REC057256 Seattle Baptist Church Addition X $496.80 24228 76th Ave W $353,302.18 3/20/13 BLD20121075 REC057326 Hinsch Change of Use X $2,852.16 23901 Edmonds Wway $356,154.34 5/2/13 BLD20130193 REC057593 Chase/McLaren Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 495 2nd Ave N $357,350.67 5/9/13 BLD20120925 REC057633 Walgreens Bowling Alley New Commercial Traffic Study X $24,708.00 9797 Edmonds Way $382,058.67 6/7/13 BLD20130313 REC057921 Anthony's Beach Café General Office Restaurant X $1,361.19 456 Admiral Way $383,419.86 6/7/13 BLD20130448 REC057925 Great Kids Academy Convenience Market Preschool X $408.00 24310 76th Ave W $383,827.86 6/13/13 BLD20130349 REC057959 Doug Johnson Vacant Land SFR vested to old plat X $840.72 8028 Cyrus Place $384,668.58 6/13/13 BLD20120590 REC057962 ND Nevada LLC Vacant Land SFR X $1,196.33 798 Daley Street $385,864.91 6/18/13 BLD20130390 REC057983 Chan Anna Quach SFR part of a SP X $1,196.33 22706 95th Pl W $387,061.24 6/20/13 BLD20130487 REC058003 Joo Family Clinic Shopping Center Medical Office X $2,880.00 22618 Highway 99 $389,941.24 6/27/13 BLD20130315 REC058053 Ronald Knowles Storage Unit Apartment X $776.56 24340 76th Ave W $390,717.80 6/28/13 JE130112 -$41,497.50 Fee Collected With: Fee Amount PWTF Annual Transportation Impact Fee Receipts and Funds Transfer Data Record Transportation Impact Fee Fund Account Number: 112.502.345.86.000.00 RECEIPTS TRANSFERS Date Permit Number Receipt Number Previous ITE Land Use New ITE Land Use Notes Packet Page 180 of 182 2013 Page 2 2013 Applicant Site Address Bus. License Bldg Permit Fund Name Reference Transferred Total Fee Collected With: Fee Amount Transportation Impact Fee Receipts and Funds Transfer Data Record Transportation Impact Fee Fund Account Number: 112.502.345.86.000.00 RECEIPTS TRANSFERS Date Permit Number Receipt Number Previous ITE Land Use New ITE Land Use Notes $349,220.30 7/22/13 BLD20130525 REC058198 Precision Homes X $1,196.33 8721 Main Street $350,416.63 7/22/13 BLD20130524 REC058200 Precision Homes Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 8725 Main Stret $351,612.96 7/29/13 BLD20130329 REC058292 McDonalds Additional SF X $20,035.70 10124 Edmonds Way $371,648.66 7/30/13 BLD20130665 REC058301 Gilbert Construction Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 321 2nd Ave N $372,844.99 8/19/13 BLD20130466 REC058414 Echelbarger Investments Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 18122 86th Pl W $374,041.32 8/19/13 BLD20130323 REC058417 Echelbarger Investments Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 18129 86th Pl W $375,237.65 8/21/13 BLD20130534 REC058439 DGR Development Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 918 Cedar Street $376,433.98 8/29/13 BLD20130562 REC058495 Community Health Center Traffic Study X $76,087.60 23320 Highway 99 $452,521.58 8/30/13 BLD20130840 REC058523 Kidd Vacant Lot SFR REFUNDED X $1,196.33 932 Olympic Ave Application WD $453,717.91 9/23/13 BLD20130595 REC058684 Wiskerchen Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 645 9th Ave N $454,914.24 9/25/13 BLD20130844 REC058705 Almark Corporation Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 8034 Cyrus Place $456,110.57 9/26/13 BLD20120895 REC058720 Borgeson Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 7822 240th St SW $457,306.90 9/26/13 BLD20120858 REC058726 Olson Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 15500 75th Pl W $458,503.23 9/30/13 BLD20130474 REC058739 Lambrecht Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 9223 Olympic View Drive $459,699.56 10/4/13 BLD20130840 REC058793 Kidd Vacant Lot SFR REFUND X -$1,196.33 932 Olympic Ave Application WD $458,503.23 10/14/13 BLD20130835 REC058852 Maston Properties Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 Loan Payment Packet Page 181 of 182 2013 Page 3 2013 Applicant Site Address Bus. License Bldg Permit Fund Name Reference Transferred Total Fee Collected With: Fee Amount Transportation Impact Fee Receipts and Funds Transfer Data Record Transportation Impact Fee Fund Account Number: 112.502.345.86.000.00 RECEIPTS TRANSFERS Date Permit Number Receipt Number Previous ITE Land Use New ITE Land Use Notes 7629 201st St SW $459,699.56 12/18/13 BLD20131026 REC059367 Acme Homes Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 23421 84th Ave W $460,895.89 12/31/13 BLD20131081 REC059425 S & D Construction Vacant Lot SFR X $1,196.33 936 Walnut Street $462,092.22 112.200 Five Corners Roundabout Project -$76,083.72 $386,008.50 $156,463.10 Interest Earned 2013 $188.79 $386,197.29 TOTAL Traffic Impact Fess collected in 2013: 2014 YEAR-END BALANCE Packet Page 182 of 182