1380_001¡:'j fr i ,-ì.r
t,.E r¿".J iLg
l''' ! '., r¡
b t tr.l
Citv of Edmonds JUþJ 1 T 2Ûr$
TO
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
(42s) 771-0220
[:t",$ ¡!Íü\!(i f lt*t1¡,nT*.{Fr\ff
( i¡ t Y {:l ¿:tilüf ü¡.i[]l-:
DATE:AprilSth 2019 See response to comments below in red
Tom Leren
The Leren CO.
FROM: Eric Carter, Plans Examiner
RE:Plan Check: BLD2019-0155
Project Address: 730 Cary RD.
Scope: New SFR,VB Construct¡on Plumbing and Mechanical included
Please be advised that the building plans for the above referenced project have
been disapproved for the purposes of obtaining a building permit. During a review
of the plans by the Building Division for compliance with the applicable building
codes, it was found that the following information, clarifications, or changes are
needed. Reviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may
result in additional comments that require attention beyond the scope of this letter.
Items that recur on this list appear in italics.
A complete review cannot be performed untilthe revised plans/documents,
including a written response in itemized letterformat indicating where the
'clouded'or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans,
have been submitted to a Permit Coordinator.
Resubmittals must be made at the Development Services Department on the 2nd
Floor of City Hall. Permit Center hours are M, T, Th, & F from 8am-4:30pm and from
8:30am-1 2pm on Wednesdays.
SubJect:
Permit:
Shank Residence (Structural Review)
BLD19-0155
General
1) The existing foundation is being used to support a portion of the new
building structure. A demolition plan was not provided within the plan set
for a comparison of new loads vs. existing loads that the foundation was
supporting.
After reviewing all the additional retrofitting that would be needed to
adequately address your comment and this code, it has been determined that we will demo and rebuild the
foundation and rebuild the basement in it's existing footprint. Plans have been revised accordingly. Revised energy
calcs have also been provided.
a) The eng¡neer needs to provide an evaluation of the new loads vs.
existing loads that the foundation is/was support¡ng. Any ex¡st¡ng
gravity load-carrying structural elements for which the
addition/alteration causes an ¡ncrease ¡n design gravity load of more
than 5 percent are required to be strengthened, supplemented,
replaced or otherwise altered as needed to carry the increased
gravity load as requ¡red by the IBC for new structures. Provide
additional reinforcement of the foundation as determined by the
evaiuationlanaiysis. IEBC 402.3
b) On the plans please indicate what is known/assumed about the
foundation (dimensions, reinforcement if known) and indicate that this
is required to be verified in the field.
Geotechnical
2, We take no exception to the assumed geotechnicalvalues utilized in
design as noted on the structural drawings (S1). However, it is
recommend that the design team research literature related to
geotechnical properties of soil in the area in order to confirm the
assumed values are reasonable. Response to this comment is not
required. The comment is for your information only.
The geotechnical values were not assumed. They were based on the geotechnical report listed in the
Foundations section of the structr*,
b"J3ïralöTflåL"tj""ron
we hire a geotechnical engineer.
56 - Main Floor Framinq Plan
1) Section cut 141S.2 is identified in several locations. However, this detail
does not exist within the drawing set. Please coordinate.
14ls2 removed from drawings.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Eric Carter
Page2 of3