The URL can be used to link to this page

2019-12-03 City Council - Full Agenda-24941. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 DECEMBER 3, 2019, 7:00 PM "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation Honoring Bill Anderson (5 min) 2. Sound Transit Presentation (25 min) 3. Housing Commission Quarterly (15 min) AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2019 2. Approval of claim checks and wire payment. 3. Ordinance amending Edmonds City Code Title 4 and Edmonds Community Development Code Title 20 to Align with State Business License Service Practices 4. Confirmation of Appointment of Nikki Okimoto Glaros to Diversity Commission 5. Confirmation of Appointment of Sekou Kone to Diversity Commission PUBLIC HEARING 1. Utility Rate Analysis, Public Hearing and future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance (30 min) 9. ACTION ITEMS 1. 2020 Legislative Agenda (20 min) 2. Proposed Capital Facilities Plan and 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (20 min) 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Housing (5 min) 4. Budget Amendment to Fund 2020 Council Retreat Training (5 min) 5. Fourth Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment (15 min) Edmonds City Council Agenda December 3, 2019 Page 1 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Deliberation and Adoption of the 2020 City Budget (75 min) 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS 13. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 14. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda December 3, 2019 Page 2 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Proclamation Honoring Bill Anderson Staff Lead: Dave Earling Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Bill Anderson has dedicated a decade of his to capturing the Edmonds Marsh through photography. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Mayor Earling will present Bill Anderson with a proclamation honoring him for his service, dedication, and environmental leadership to the Edmonds community. Packet Pg. 3 5.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Sound Transit Presentation Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Michelle Martin Background/History Funding from the voter -approved Sound Transit 3 in 2016 provided $40 million to be apportioned to parking and access projects for the Sounder Stations in Edmonds and Mukilteo. Staff Recommendation Consider information & discuss as needed Narrative Sound Transit representatives have been reaching out to the public about options for parking and access at the Sounder Station in Edmonds. ST staff have also exchanged information with City staff. On November 26, Sound Transit representative, Miranda Redinger, will present more specific information. (See attached slide deck.) Attachments: _ST.Station.Presentn.Edmonds CC Meeting.20191203 Packet Pg. 4 Edmonds and Mukilteo Stations Parking and Access Improvements City Council Update - Edmonds 121312019 VSouNDTRANSIT Packet ., 5.2.a Goals for Today • Project Overview • Spring 2019 Outreach � • Project Identification • Evaluation Framework • Evaluation Results • Fall 2019 Outreach • Next Steps 0 W d y a c 0 _s E a Packet Pg. 6 5.2.a ornier_t U)vp.rvl-r-. U V a Packet Pg. 7 5.2.a Sound Transit is investing in parking and access projects at Edmonds and Mukilteo Sounder Stations • Part of the 2016 ST3 Funding Measure • $40 million (2014$), split between both stations • Projects identified, evaluated, and narrowed in this phase • Sound Transit Board makes final decision to proceed and fund selected projects 0 W a c 0 E a Packet Pg. 8 5.2.a Inna 2079 C:nmmiini-tv Inr a Packet Pg. 9 5.2.a Initial Outreach in March -April • More than 1,100 people participated in -person and online • Asked community about barriers to access: limited parking, limited sidewalk and bike facilities, poor transit connections, for example a Packet Pg. 10 5.2.a aroier_t iripnriticatir a Packet Pg. 11 Data Collection & Plan Review • Where Sounder riders are coming from and going to • How riders reach the station • Parking utilization • Traffic congestion • Sidewalk/bike facility conditions • Transit schedules • Review of local plans from cities, counties, other agencies Packet Pg. 12 5.2.a Initial Project Identification More than 50 projects identified from: • Public input • Sound Transit plans • City plans • Other agencies • Project team 0 W a` 0 M a Packet Pg. 13 5.2.a U V a Packet Pg. 14 Consistenry Supports city, Sr, and other agency goals ST System Expansion Implementation Plan ST3 Plan 2018 ST service standards and performance measures City comprehensive plans Waterfront plans WSQ6T Mukill Multimodal Terminal Plan Z *4 i1M� Implementation Projects can be implemented by 2024 within the project's ST3 budget Cost-effectiveness Partnerships Financial sustainability Innovation Community ■ Transit/Everett Transit Long Range Plan 71 hA Increase Ridership on K CAI% Sounder North Environment I Multimodal Access Avoids and minimizes environmental impacts and enhances community outcomes Cultural resources Critical habitats Air quality Resilience Improves access to Edmonds and stations Reliability Customer experience Equity Connectivity Safety and human health Packet Pg. 15 Process Improvement projects were drawn from city, county, and transit agency plans as well as from discussions with stakeholders and outreach to the public 57 Improvement projects were then put through a pre-screening process which removed projects that were ineligible according to project guidelines 38 Improvement projects that made it through the pre-screening process were then evaluated against 19 criteria based on the goals of the project 25 Improvement projects are recommended or highly recommended; the Sound Transit Board will consider which projects to advance into next phase Packet Pg. 16 a Pbrt of Edmonds G 228th St SW bike gravel lot and pedestrian Harbor Square connection parking lot Downtown pedestrian City of Edmonds lot lighting improvements on the SE corner of 100th Ave W and W Dayton St and 9th Ave S bicycle 2nd Ave S improvements Washington State 4D Bowdoin Way Bicycle Ferries parking lot improvements adjacent to station 80th Ave W Bicycle Sallsh Grassing improvements parking lot Pine St and SR 104 Remote parking at pedestrian Old Woodway improvements Campus SR 104 pedestrian Remote parking at improvements SR 104 and 100th Ave W 10 Additional Bus Bays at Edmonds Station Remote parking at 76th Ave W and % SR 104 Bus %mpicView Dr improvements Remote parking at Wind and rain Westgate Chapel screening at Edmonds Station jo Remote parking at Edmonds Grace Bus transfer timing Lutheran Church improvements Additional on -demand secure Bike lockers 0 ' a 5.2.a �� 1 mil¢ radius 5 0 '/x mile radio a�nl :3 .#A a ' xuz I 1 C m,mzsx W wne ` wee r/ � v=ns.sw i cm•Is co CID � ca 10 O wemweane Y ,.nw o Packet Pg. 17 t t 3 mile ra ius �� Edmonds Station - Draft "Recommended" Projects 5.2.a • Parking adjacent to the Sounder station U • Bus timing improvements N • Wind and rain screening at the station 0 • On -demand bike lockers at the stationLq w • Additional bus bays/layover near the station L • 228t" Street pedestrian and bicycle connection o • SR 104 bus improvements • Downtown pedestrian lighting/crossing improvements • Pine Street pedestrian improvements E • SR 104 pedestrian improvements a • Remote parking at Edmonds Grace Lutheran Church • Parking at city -owned lot at 2nd Avenue/Dayton Street Packet Pg. 18 5.2.a ��r��yur�r►rrr.F U V a Packet P9. 19 5.2.a October -November Outreach • More than 1,700 participants online and in -person • Nearly 500 completed surveys on projects • General concurrence with technical evaluation 0 E W w a 0 0 0 E a Packet Pg. 20 5.2.a October-Novemher Outreach • Strongest support for transit schedule alignment • Strong support for parking near the station • Support for pedestrian lighting and crossing improvements • Least support for remote parking Packet Pg. 21 5.2.a RXI MIN IP_r U V a Packet Pg. 22 5.2.a Next Steps • Similar briefing in Mukilteo • Orient new Edmonds Councilmembers to project • Advance project list to Sound Transit Board • Based on Board direction, begin Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Review a Packet Pg. 23 Thank you. I SouNnTiu►Nsir e soundtransit. org f W O 5.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Housing Commission Quarterly Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Michelle Martin Background/History The City Council adopted Resolution No. 1427 (attached) on April 16, 2019, establishing the Citizens' Housing Commission and its work for the 2019/2020 period. To ensure appointees would come from around the city (not just "the Bowl"), the Council decided that appointments should come from seven areas of town. A postcard was mailed citywide, letting people know that the application process was open and over the next three months, about 135 applications were submitted. In July 2019, the City Council approved a budget amendment for the Development Services Department to hire professional assistance for: (a) meeting facilitation and (b) community engagement. The Council also approved of video -recording Commission meetings instead of taking formal minutes. An RFQ process was launched, which had responses from 11 qualified firms. This led to interviews, reference checks, and final selection, followed by the preparation and execution of professional service agreements for the work. By late summer, each Council member had appointed two Commissioners and one alternate and the Mayor appointed one Commissioner and one alternate. (See attached list of all appointees.) Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Mission The Housing Commission's mission (per Resolution No. 1427) is to: Develop diverse housing policy options for Council consideration designed to expand the range of housing (including rental and owned) available in Edmonds; options that are irrespective of age, gender, race, religious affiliation, physical disability or sexual orientation. Monthly Meetings The Housing Commission had its first meeting on September 26,2019 (agenda attached). This included brainstorming and prioritization of numerous topics for the Commission to consider (see attached "HC Interests" list). The Commission also decided to have its regular meetings on the second Thursday evening of each month. The Commission's second meeting was on October 10 (agenda attached). The discussion included review of an overall timeframe (attached) and a month -by -month list of topics (attached). Packet Pg. 25 5.3 At its third meeting (agenda attached), the Housing Commission discussed a draft community engagement plan and approaches for a first public survey. In between meetings, the Commission undertook extensive readings on housing issues so that everyone could be knowledgeable about existing resources, data, definitions, etc. Also, most members completed their required online Open Public Meetings Act training. Community Engagement Community outreach is an essential part of this project. It is taking different forms as summarized below: d City staff has created a new website for the Housing Commission's work and will be adding more updates in the near future. Meeting agendas and videos are posted on the main City website too. 6 Housing News Memos go out periodically from the Department Director to a mailing list of about 380 people. 6 Press releases about the project have been distributed. 6 Business cards have been made for the Commissioners to hand out; the cards include the project website and the Commission's meeting schedule. d A Comments Box is being provided at Commission meetings for written comments (in addition to a brief comment period at the beginning of each meeting). 6 Other future activities will include: o Surveys o Online activities o Public open houses o Participation at community events. Next Steps The Housing Commission's work since September 2019 has been mainly focused on having a common understanding about housing resources, programs, data, and terminology, which will help enable informed policy discussions. Moving into 2020, the Commission will be prioritizing its preferred policy topics and working in small committees to draft proposals for these topics. Each committee's work will be brought back to the full Commission for a decision on whether to initially include the proposal in its draft recommendations. Then more public input will be sought before the Commission finalizes its draft recommendations in late 2020 for the City Council to begin considering in 2021, with additional public process. Attachments: Resolution 1427 Housing Commission Member List HC_Act.1_Interest Results CHC 9.26.19 Agenda CHC 10.10.19 Agenda Housing Commission Timeframe S u bj e cts.Ove ry i ew. M o. by. M o CHC 11.14.19 Agenda Packet Pg. 26 5.3.a RESOLUTION NO. 1427 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE CITIZENS' HOUSING COMMISSION WHEREAS, in 2017 the City of Edmonds began the process of developing a Housing Strategy to fulfill an objective of the Housing Element of the city's Comprehensive Plan at P. 96, which states: "Implementation Action: Develop a strategy by 2019 for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs;" and WHEREAS, the Council has heard numerous comments and concerns from our constituents that the process for establishing policies around an expanded range of housing options should be revised to include greater public input and balanced representation; and WHEREAS, three primary themes have emerged from input the Council has received from its constituents; and WHEREAS, first, rather than an Administration -appointed task force working toward housing policy recommendations, members of the public have expressed a strong preference for a process which establishes a Housing Commission via applications from interested citizens; and WHEREAS, second, a strong preference has been expressed for sufficient time to be provided for all housing -related issues to be thoroughly vetted to enable policy recommendations to be brought forward that are in Edmonds' long term best interests; and WHEREAS, finally, the public has made clear it expects members of the Housing Commission should represent all areas of Edmonds and the Edmonds Bowl should not be over- represented; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2018, the Council passed Resolution 1420 to docket a Comprehensive Plan amendment that is expected to result in the removal of the 2019 timeline for establishment of an Edmonds Affordable Housing strategy as called for in the current Comprehensive Plan and to provide additional time for development of an appropriate array of diverse housing options for Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the Council also agrees that the process for citizen involvement should be retooled to encourage volunteer participation from across Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the expanded timeline for development of diverse housing policy options provides the opportunity to establish a Citizens' Housing Commission to enable direct citizen involvement in this important process; and Packet Pg. 27 5.3.a WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the Council discussed next steps toward achieving this objective; and WHEREAS, a significant initial step will be to establish a Citizens' Housing Commission to assess all factors that must be considered in driving toward housing policies that expand the supply of diverse housing options while maintaining Edmonds' character and quality of life; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the Council also provided direction that such a Commission should be formed; and WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, the Council provided more specific direction as to the contents of a resolution that would create the Citizens' Housing Commission; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Citizens' Housing Commission Created. The Citizens' Housing Commission is hereby created and shall be subject to the following provisions: A. Mission. The mission of the new Citizens' Housing Commission shall be as follows: Develop diverse housing policy options for Council consideration designed to expand the range of housing (including rental and owned) available in Edmonds; options that are irrespective of age, gender, race, religious affiliation, physical disability or sexual orientation. B. Appointment Process. The Commission shall consist of fifteen voting members: each Councilmember will select two appointees and one alternate; and the mayor will select one appointee and one alternate. The mayor's selection will be from the remaining pool of applicants after Councilmembers have made their selections. C. Appointment by Zone. Each of the seven Councilmembers shall be assigned a particular zone at the Council President's direction and will be responsible for assessing applications from that zone (see map attached as Exhibit A describing the seven geographic zones of Edmonds which will be attached to the Commission application form). Each Councilmember will select two appointees and one alternate from his/her assigned zone. In the event that there are insufficient applicants to fill the positions for a particular zone, the Councilmember assigned to that zone may select from the remaining applicants residing in any other zone, but only after the other Councilmembers have made their selections. D. Meetings. The Commission will meet at least once per month on a day and time to be determined by the Commission, and may meet more frequently at the Commission's discretion. The time and place of the first meeting of the Commission shall be established by the Council President. 2 Packet Pg. 28 5.3.a E. Voting. Alternates should attend meetings to remain current on the Commission's progress but shall not be voting members unless they are participating in lieu of an absent Commissioner from their assigned zone. F. Liaisons. Two Councilmembers shall be assigned to the Commission as Council Liaisons in an advisory (non -voting) role. G. Public Outreach. The Commission shall host public outreach sessions (open houses, town halls, etc.) once per quarter at varying public locations within Edmonds to provide updates on its progress in developing housing option policy recommendations. H. Website Updates. The status of the Commission's work on the development of expanded housing options shall be updated regularly on the city's Housing website. I. Reporting to the Council. The Commission shall report progress to the Council at least once per quarter, beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2019. J. Sunset Date. The Commission will complete its work by December 31, 2020 and have a sunset date of January 1, 2021. Section 2. Recruiting. A post card will be sent to each Edmonds household announcing the application process and deadlines. This mailing will be in addition to the process normally used to publicize Commission application availability (e.g., City website announcements, articles in local media, etc.). Section 3. Application Process. Applicants for appointment to the Commission shall be subject to the following: A. Qualifications. Commission applicants must be current residents of Edmonds. B. Zones. Each applicant must identify which of the seven "zones" he/she lives within (see map attached as Exhibit A describing the seven geographic zones of Edmonds which will be attached to the Commission application form). C. Application Contents. The following information will be requested on the application form: a. Occupational status and background. b. Organizational affiliation. c. Why are you seeking this appointment? d. What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? e. List any other Board, Commission, Committee or official position you currently hold with the City of Edmonds. f. How long have you lived in Edmonds? g. Do you rent or own your home? h. Are you currently a landlord of property located in Edmonds? Note: items a-e above are standard questions of applicants for any Edmonds Board or Commission. Items f-h above are specific to the Edmonds Citizens' Housing Commission. 3 Packet Pg. 29 5.3.a RESOLVED this 161h day of April, 2019. CITY OF EDMONDS M'AYOR,'DAVE EARLING ATTEST: CLERK, SC ASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. April 12, 2019 April 16, 2019 1427 4 Packet Pg. 30 OF ED4�� City of Edmonds Census -based Area Map Igo. lggo 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Sooth-Coo Park QC N O\y�,pCC�Ce�N W E S BeaNew Pak Hutt ve�k fia 0�? � see�lew '�,� Ekmentay Blerre PeM SoM1utM1 ' rls Park PeeeM1 Main St. Trek v .......... ,......................................... 196th St. SW M klePlewootl lull K� e eel 651 220th St. SW 212th St. SW v t 01 Z Mettmee KA SCM1ooI Wootlway Elementay leke Bellinger Perk Eamo�w: Community College CP Eleme MO,l Place 'Etlle S-1 City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N o Edmonds, WA 98202 h 1 inch = 2,000 feet February 201 Edmonds Housing Strateg Packet Pg. 31 5.3.b CITIZENS' HOUSING COMMISSION MEMBER LIST Commissioners Zone Name 1 Karen Haase Herrick 1 James Ogonowski 2 Keith Soltner 2 Weijia Wu 3 George Keefe 3 John Reed 4 Nichole Franko 4 Michael McMurray 5 Tanya Kataria 5 Greg Long 6 Jess Blanch 6 Alena Nelson-Vietmeier 7 Will Chen 7 Judi Gladstone Mayor's Choice Bob Throndsen Alternate Members Zone Name 1 Leif Warren 2 Wendy Wyatt 3 Eva -Denise Miller 4 Kenneth Sund 5 Shirley Havenga 6 Rick Nishino 7 Jean Salls Mayor's Choice Tana Axtelle a L L o� 0 .y E E 0 U .N 0 x J E 0 E E 0 U 3 O x c E a Packet Pg. 32 5.3.c 7 C -0 Citizens' Housing c o m In i s s i n n HOUSING COMMISSION INTEREST RESULTS Housing Types (incl. ADUs) & Zoning 28 Housing types/barriers to types (pros & cons) 12 Development Zoning effects on housing 10 Development Accessory Dwelling units (ADU) 6 Development City Revenue 22 Financially sustainable (balance of uses) 16 Finance Edmonds financial situation 6 Finance Multi -family Tax Exemption (MFTE) & other Incentive Programs (Tools & Abatements) 22 Programs Guiding Principles 21 Objectives/targets 14 Goals Clarify mission 7 Goals Housing Efforts in Other Cities 19 Group tour —interesting projects in other cities 9 Community Housing strategies, programs, & Ideas (other cities) 10 Research Housing Cost Factors 18 Housing costfactors (developmentfees) 10 Development Development fees 8 Development Community Engagement 17 Community Comprehensive Plan and Future Growth 14 Comprehensive Plan 14 Background Documents Coordination with parks & school district 0 Background Documents Transportation 14 Light rail impacts 7 Transportation Transit hubs 7 Transportation Housing Affordability 13 Threshold of what is affordable 8 Data Housing instabilty 5 Data State Law & Recent Legislation 13 Recent state legislation 3 Regional Efforts Growth Management Act (GMA) 8 Regulation & Law State or Federal laws 1 Regulation & Law Open Government/legal issues for boards and commissions 1 Regulation & Law Distribution of Income/Housing/etc. 12 Distribution of income/housing/etc. 8 Data Range of income 4 Data Edmonds Housing Data (by Zone) 12 Data Needs of seniors, veterans, etc. 12 Community Definitions 11 Definitions (come to agreement) 6 Definitions Housing terms/definitions 5 Definitions Housing Strategy Background 11 Background Documents Coordination w/ other cities 9 Regional Efforts Vibrancy & community 9 Community Environmental impacts 8 Environment How housing affects economy 7 Data Fed, state, regional housing programs & Resources 6 Regional Efforts Tree canopy balance 5 Environment Housing instabilty 5 Data Humanize affordability 4 Community Data on workers (in Edmonds) 3 Data Summary data (demographics) 3 Data Existing projects 3 Data Infrastructure capacity 3 Data What is off topic/mission? 0 Q Packet Pg. 33 5.3.d Op E D o Agenda Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission snl,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEPTEMBER 26, 2019, 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. INTRODUCTIONS 1. Welcome -Mission -Process 2. Introductions IV. COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS & COMMENTS ON MISSION OR PROCESS V. TOPICS OF INTEREST FOR FUTURE MEETINGS 1. Topics of Interest for Future Meetings VI. FUTURE MEETINGS -SCHEDULE & LOCATIONS 1. Future Meetings —Schedule & Locations VII. UPDATES ON COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND CONSULTANT ASSISTANCE 1. Updates on Consultant Assistance and Community Outreach VIII. COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS & COMMENTS IX. ADJOURN a� r a >, L L cu Or c 0 .y E E 0 U c .N 0 x c a� Q to N U x U r c E t R Q Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission Agenda September 26, 2019 Packet Pg. 34 5.3.e o Agenda Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission V tiHy° BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 OCTOBER 10, 2019, 6:30 PM HOUSING COMMISSION'S MISSION "DEVELOP DIVERSE HOUSING POLICY OPTIONS FOR (CITY) COUNCIL CONSIDERATION DESIGNED TO EXPAND THE RANGE OF HOUSING (INCLUDING RENTAL AND OWNED) AVAILABLE IN-i EDMONDS; OPTIONS THAT ARE IRRESPECTIVE OF AGE, GENDER, RACE, RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, PHYSICAL DISABILITY OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION." - FROM CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1427 21 OPENING r L ROLL CALL 3 a c 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS N E INTRODUCTION OF CONSULTANTS E 0 1. Introduction of Consultants v c DISCUSSION OF OPERATING PRINCIPLES o 1. Operating Principles = �a REVIEW OF TOPICS AND SCHEDULE 1. Topics and Schedule a� Q FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING IN WASHINGTON 1. Framework for Community Planning in Washington 0 U 2 EDMONDS' HOUSING ELEMENT V 1. Edmonds' Housing Element r E COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GOALS t r 1. Community Engagement Goals Q MEETING LOGISTICS AND GENERAL EXPECTATIONS 1. Meeting Logistics and General Expectations ADJOURN Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission Agenda October 10, 2019 Packet Pg. 35 HOUSING COMMISSION WORK PLAN OVERVIEW 5.3.f Task Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Establish foundation Identify Framwork for Policies Prioritize Policy Topics & Develop Options Develop Preliminary Policy Recommendations Refine & Finalize Recommendations Provide for Community Engagement ♦ • Update City Council ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Key ♦ Potential Survey • Potential Special Event ■ Report to City Council Note: This timeframe is proposed and subject to change as the process evolves. Packet Pg. 36 5.3.g Oct. 4, 2019 Key Subjects for Housing Commission Meetings: Month -by -Month Note: This list includes topics identified by the Housing Commission at its September 2019 meeting. It provides initial guidance, although subject to change. September 2019 Welcome Mission/Process Introductions Tops of interest for future meetings (group exercise) Schedule for future meetings Updates on consultant assistance & community outreach October 2019 Meet consultants Discuss meeting rules/expectations Begin planning for community engagement Discuss timeframe & subjects for Commission meetings Update on Open Public Meetings Act & public record requirements Review federal & state laws (incl GMA + new legislation) Review regional planning framework Review local planning process (incl. coordination w/ parks, schools & future growth) Review Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Review Hwy 99 Area Plan Review prior Housing Strategy process Consider next HC meeting logistics November 2019 Consider community engagement plan & next steps Review general data about region (population, demographics, etc.) 1 m c� Q. L CJ c 0 N E E 0 U c .y 7 0 x 0 M 0 M 3 m as O N r V d r c m E t 0 r a Packet Pg. 37 5.3.g Review general data about Edmonds (demographics, workforce, housing inventory, etc.) Review housing's relationship with zoning Affordability: Terminology/definitions Income thresholds & what they mean for people Data about housing affordability (for different types, income -levels & needs) in: Region Edmonds overall Within specific Edmonds zones/districts (i.e. 1-7) December 2019 Review community input to date & next steps Consider housing needs of specific populations Seniors Veterans Families Others? Consider housing cost factors (incl. development fees) Learn about housing types (incl. pros/cons/impacts) January 2020 Discuss environmental (incl. tree canopy) & infrastructure impacts/choices Discuss transportation issues/ light rail impacts Discuss economic & fiscal sustainability aspects of housing & other uses Discuss vibrancy/community livability Consider characteristics of different areas of the city Learn about major development projects in Edmonds (such as Westgate Village) Learn what programs & incentives Edmonds has for housing Learn what other cities and agencies are doing about housing Learn about state & federal resources Introduce next steps for developing policy framework 2 Packet Pg. 38 5.3.g February 2020 Discuss mission & values Consider developing issue statement, principles, goals, or objectives related to mission Discuss meaning of "policy" and "policy options" Discuss final product to give City Council Identify preferred subjects for housing policies March 2020 Review and refine subjects to be addressed by housing policies Discuss and prioritize housing policy subjects Review Commission's timeframe & any emerging needs Consider community engagement & next steps April 2020 Identify approach to policy development Discuss intent & options for Vt set of subjects for housing policy development May 2020 Revisit & make any refinements regarding 1st set of housing policy recommendations Discuss intent & options for 2nd set of subjects for housing policy development June 2020 Revisit & make any refinements regarding 25t set of housing policy recommendations Discuss intent & options for 3rd set of subjects for housing policy development Discuss community engagement & next steps July 2020 Revisit & make any refinements regarding 3rd set of recommended housing policies Discuss intent & options for 4t" set of recommended housing policies August 2020 Revisit & make any refinements regarding 4t" set of housing policy recommendations Discuss community engagement & next steps Packet Pg. 39 5.3.g September 2020 Finalize package of draft policy recommendations Review community input to date & next steps October 2020 Consider any refinements to draft policy recommendations Discuss community engagement & next steps November 2020 Review community input to date Make any changes to draft recommendations Consider draft report about Housing Commission process December 2020 Consider any other input Finalize package of housing policy recommendations 4 Packet Pg. 40 5.3.h Agenda 4 ' Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission 'rt j44, BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 NOVEMBER 14, 2019, 6:30 PM "DEVELOP DIVERSE HOUSING POLICY OPTIONS FOR (CITY) COUNCIL CONSIDERATION DESIGNED TO EXPAND THE RANGE OF HOUSING (INCLUDING RENTAL AND OWNED) AVAILABLE IN EDMONDS; OPTIONS THAT ARE IRRESPECTIVE OF AGE, GENDER, RACE, RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, PHYSICAL DISABILITY OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION" - FROM CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1427 1. ROLL CALL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS INTRODUCTION OF ANY HOUSING COMMISSION MEMBERS WHO HAVE NOT ATTENDED PREVIOUSLY PUBLIC COMMENTS COMMENTS FROM ANY HOUSING COMMISSION ALTERNATES APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 10, 2019 MEETING NOTES 1. 10/10/19 Meeting Notes for Approval APPROVAL OF GROUND RULES 1. Approval of Ground Rules DISCUSSION OF ANY BACKGROUND READING MATERIALS, INCLUDING: 1. DEMOGRAPHIC & HOUSING FACTS 2. VISION 2050 HOUSING BACKGROUND PAPER 3. EDMONDS HOUSING NEEDS STUDY 4. Discussion of Background Materials PRESENTATION ON HOUSING AFFORDABILITY (ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY) 1. Presentation on Housing Affordability DRAFT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN 1. Draft Community Engagement Plan MINOR PROCEDURAL ISSUES 1. Agenda Memo Minor Procedural Issues w a Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission Agenda November 14, 2019 Packet Pg. 41 5.3.h ADJOURN .r a Edmonds Citizens Housing Commission Agenda November 14, 2019 Packet Pg. 42 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 11-26-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 43 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES NOVEMBER 26, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern Mike Nelson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Dave Teitzel, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Shane Hope, Development Services Director Leif Bjorback, Building Official Dan Gooding, Code Enforcement Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:10 p.m., the Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION, RCW 42.30.110(1)(I) The Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in executive session to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.140(1)(i). 3. CLOSED SESSION: COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY. RCW 42.30. At approximately 6:30 p.m., the Council then discussed collective bargaining strategy per RCW 42.30.140(1)(4). e n inr ruN At 6:48 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 26, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 44 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of re -issued claim check #239692 dated November 21, 2019 for $247.97, claim checks #239693 through #239775 dated November 27, 2019 for $1,382,515.36 and wire payment of $417.67. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: everett daily herald reissue claims 11-27-19 better prop wire 11-27-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 11-27-19 Packet Pg. 45 7.2.a vchlist 11 /21 /2019 12:11:27PM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239692 11/21/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account EDH879042 CITY NOTICES 2020-2025 CIP-CFP City Notices 2020-2025 CIP-CFP Oct 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 EDH879051 CITY NOTICES PRELIM. 2020 BUDC city notices: preliminary 2020 budge 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total Bank total Total vouchers Page c a� Amoun E �a Q. m 63.3E c �a N 184.6, 247.9 , 247.9 , E M 247.91 0 2 El Page: 1 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239693 11/27/2019 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 239694 11/27/2019 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 239695 11/27/2019 073573 ANIXTER 239696 11/27/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 0000025431 TRAFFIC - PIED SIGN TRAFFIC - PIED SIGN 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Tota I : 25962 BRONZE PLAQUE: HAMBLER BRONZE PLAQUE: HAMBLER 127.200.64.573.20.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 127.200.64.573.20.49.00 Tota I : 14M059521 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 1991510359 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 1991510360 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1991516016 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 7.2.b Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239696 11/27/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) r 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 c 6.1' m PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1 - a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE L 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 c 6.1 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Y 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ (D 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1 1 E 10.4% Sales Tax 2 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6z ,- 10.4% Sales Tax O 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.61 > 10.4% Sales Tax o 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6z a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6z rn 10.4% Sales Tax ti 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6' N 1991516017 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT r FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2£ FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( 10.4% Sales Tax m 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9 1 t 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 r 1.9£ Q Total : 164.71 239697 11/27/2019 077303 ASCENDENT LLC 141416 ASCENDENT LLC HYDRANT DEPO! ASCENDENT LLC HYDRANT DEPO2 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 239697 11/27/2019 077303 ASCENDENT LLC (Continued) 421.000.245.110 Total 239698 11/27/2019 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 108565 PW BUILDING - UPGRADE PW BUILDING - UPGRADE 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 Total 239699 11/27/2019 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 112390 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 658 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 658 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 658 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 658 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 658 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total 239700 11/27/2019 073834 BATTERIES PLUS P20645695 TRAFFIC - NEW BATTERY FOR OV[ TRAFFIC - NEW BATTERY FOR OV[ 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 7.2.b Page: 3 Page: 3 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239700 11/27/2019 073834 073834 BATTERIES PLUS 239701 11/27/2019 072775 BAVCO 239702 11/27/2019 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 239703 11/27/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 930392 1137943-IN 1139421-IN PO # Description/Account Total ; WATER QUALITY - BACKFLOW PAF WATER QUALITY - BACKFLOW PAF 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 790.5 GAL FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 790.5 GAL 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 602.8 GAL FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 602.8 GAL 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total 1697439 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 1698535 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 5646626 STORM - DUMP FEE CLEAN DIRT STORM - DUMP FEE CLEAN DIRT 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 5647370 ROADWAY - ASPHALT ROADWAY - ASPHALT 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 7.2.b Page: 4 Amoun 167.9( m E �a a 305.0( L 3 15.0( c �a 33.2E Y 353.21 u t U E 2 1,427.0E U 0 R 1,090.7, o 2,517.8( a Q rn 583.3 1 ti N 45.5( N E 645.5: 50.3E E t U m r 634.21 Q 326.8f Page: 4 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239703 11/27/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 239704 11/27/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 20773716 20773717 20773721 20773722 ai1"L:1-I 239705 11/27/2019 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATION 95 7.2.b Page: 5 PO # Description/Account Amoun c 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 32.6� m Total: 2,318.55 E, �a a BLDG COPIER LEASE & METER US W Bldg copier lease and meter usage 3 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 59.5E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 6.2( Y PLANNING COPIER LEASE/METER U Planning Dept copier lease and metes 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 70.6( E 10.4% Sales Tax M 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 7.3< Z CONTRACT CHARGE/METER USAC 14- o contract charge/meter usage �a 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 47.1 , o L 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 4.9- Q COUNCIL CANON COPIER MONTHI M Monthly contract charge 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 26.4z N B/W meter usage T 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 4.2, Color meter usage E 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 70.3" 12 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 10.5- DEV SVCS COPIER LEASE/METER E Dev Svcs Copier lease & meter usag( m 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 1,428.7, Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 148.5E Total : 1,884.5° COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT / Page: 5 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 239705 11/27/2019 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATION (Continued) 239706 11/27/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 239707 11/27/2019 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 239708 11/27/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 239709 11/27/2019 072145 DISTINCTIVE WINDOWS INC PO # Description/Account Consulting: Communications and 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total LY 282485 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 65272 19-3976 21995 22005 Total ; CITY CODE WEB UPDATE & ORDIN edmonds city code web update and 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total CITY COUNCIL MTG. MINUTES/TRA city council meeting minutes and 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total LIBRARY - BALANCE FOR FURNISF LIBRARY - BALANCE FOR FURNISF 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 CITY PARK BUILDING - BALANCE C CITY PARK BUILDING - BALANCE C 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total 7.2.b Page: 6 Amoun c 2,500.0( �% 2,500.0( a (D L 3 61.4f CM U) 6.4f U 67.9( E 2 U 307.5( o R 28.0£ p L 335.51 a Q M 500.5( N 500.5( T E 12,684.8( 1,319.2, t U m r 6,719.4� Q 698.8' 21,422.3' Page: 6 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 239710 11/27/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS 23914 PUBLIC WORKS - REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS - REPAIRS 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Tota I : 239711 11/27/2019 014430 DMH INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC INC 489324 LIBRARY - FAN MOTOR INSTALLED LIBRARY - FAN MOTOR INSTALLED 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Tota I : 239712 11/27/2019 077300 DONOVAN PLUMBING INC BLD20191478 REFUND OF PERMIT FEES Refund of Permit fees (duplicate pern 001.000.257.620 Total 239713 11/27/2019 007253 DUNN LUMBER 6626433 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total 239714 11/27/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1501 FAC MAINT- HISTORIC PLAQUE FAC MAINT - HISTORIC PLAQUE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1502 FAC MAINT - SHOP FAC MAINT - SHOP 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.2.b Page: 7 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 8 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239714 11/27/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) r 10.4% Sales Tax c E, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.7£ 1504 FAC MAINT - SHOP f° a FAC MAINT - SHOP L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 63.2, .3 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 c 6.5£ 1506 PM SUPPLIES: SPRAY PAINT Y PM SUPPLIES: SPRAY PAINT U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.9£ � 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.0z n 1507 PM SUPPLIES: OUTDOOR CORDS, U PM SUPPLIES: OUTDOOR CORDS, O 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 49.8� > 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.1 £ a 1508 PM SUPPLIES: ROPE, LED LIGHTS Q PM SUPPLIES: ROPE, LED LIGHTS M 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 51.5E' 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.3E r Total: 235.6' 239715 11/27/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S fd U LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 51.2, (D 3-03575 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL E CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL m 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 424.4- 3-07525 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE Q LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 51.2, 3-07709 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S Page: 8 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 239715 11/27/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 3-09350 3-09800 3-29875 239716 11/27/2019 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR151777 239717 11/27/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 239718 11/27/2019 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC EDH881189 EDH881511 EDH881636 PO # Description/Account 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 Total ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 Maintenance for printers 11/21/19 - 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4162 city ordinance no. 4162 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 LEGAL AD Legal Ad: PLN20190048 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 LEGAL AD Legal Ad: PLN20190054 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total 0808629 WATER - OMNI METER REGISTERS WATER - OMNI METER REGISTERS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 7.2.b Page: 9 Amoun c 55.6' �a a 104.2E L 3 64.4E U 0 51.2, u 802.4' E 2 U 0 307.2( i 0 L 31.9E 0- 339.1; Q rn ti N 28.9E T E 61.5z 2 U 147.5, E 238.0: u m r Q 689.7( 71.7, Page: 9 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 10 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239718 11/27/2019 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued) 0823755 WATER INVENTORY - SUPPLIES WATER INVENTORY - SUPPLIES E 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 5,899.6E a Freight L 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 84.81 3 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 c 622.3E 0 Total : 7,368.X Y U 239719 11/27/2019 071998 FOSTER, KELSEY BID-8390 BID/ED! COPYWRITING FOR NOVE BID/Ed! copywriting for November E 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( 'M Total: 600.0( 0 239720 11/27/2019 011900 FRONTIER 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) i SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 0 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 31.1 a 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES Q TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 162.7' � TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES ti N 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 302.1, 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE N TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE E 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.8 1 fd TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE U 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.9( 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE E TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 47.0, TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE Q 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 87.3E 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 74.9' Page: 10 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 11 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239720 11/27/2019 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 141.3, a Total: 903.4E L 3 239721 11/27/2019 075923 GOV QA LLC 1229-191101 GOVQA FOIA/MUNICIPAL COURT 11 GovQA FIOA Service for Municipal C( 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 5,166.E , Y 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 537.3' Total: 5,704.0( E 239722 11/27/2019 074804 HARLES, JANINE 527281 PHOTOGRAPHY - NOVEMBER 201 R Photography for November 2019 0 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.0( R Total: 200.0( o L Q 239723 11/27/2019 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 2019-192 TOURISM PROMOTION AND MARKI Q Tourism promotion and marketing for �- 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 1,666.0( Tourism website maintenance Novem rz. 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 200.0( Total : 1,866.0( N E 239724 11/27/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1613190 PM SUPPLIES: PIPE STRAPS, FIP L PM SUPPLIES: PIPE STRAPS, FIP L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34.4, 10.2% Sales Tax m 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.5" t 2012531 PM SUPPLIES: VALVE CAPS, PIPE I PM SUPPLIES: VALVE CAPS, PIPE I r Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.0' 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.1 2023578 PM SUPPLIES: BRUSH SET, SCREE Page: 11 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 11 /27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239724 11/27/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 12 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r PM SUPPLIES: BRUSH SET, SCREE c d E, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 109.2- 10.2% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.1 z L 3081732 PM SUPPLIES: HEX BIT SOCKET SE 3 PM SUPPLIES: HEX BIT SOCKET SE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 c 37.4z m 10.2% Sales Tax Y 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.8, (D 3510920 PM SUPPLIES: BYPASS PRUNERS U PM SUPPLIES: BYPASS PRUNERS E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 99.8( n 10.2% Sales Tax ,U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.1 £ _0 3621376 PM SUPPLIES: YARD HYDRANT, PF PM SUPPLIES: YARD HYDRANT, PF 0 L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.8, a 10.2% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.2, rn 6024244 PM SUPPLIES: WELDED RING, CLE ti PM SUPPLIES: WELDED RING, CLE N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 20.2' r 10.2% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.0E 6024261 PM SUPPLIES: PVC PIPE PM SUPPLIES: PVC PIPE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 28.6( 10.2% Sales Tax E E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.9, m 7024069 PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER, PIPE, ADA Q PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER, PIPE, ADA 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 121.8- 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.4, Page: 12 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239724 11/27/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 8013235 PM SUPPLIES: STRING LIGHTS, LU PM SUPPLIES: STRING LIGHTS, LU 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 695.2( 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.9, Total: 1,418.91, 239725 11/27/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3308894 RICHARDSON - DESK Richardson - Desk 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 1,819.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 189.2< Total: 2,008.7: 239726 11/27/2019 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10065341 FLEET - SUPPLIES FLEET - SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 77.2, 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 8.01 300-10065417 FLEET - PARTS FLEET - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 50.9� 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 5.3( Total : 141.5° 239727 11/27/2019 076136 JEFF ANDERSON BID-11182019 BID/ED! HOLIDAY MARKETING DES BID/Ed! holiday marketing design 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.0( Tota I : 100.0( 239728 11/27/2019 075356 JENNIFER ZIEGLER PUBLIC 053 STATE LOBBYIST FOR NOVEMBER State lobbyist for November 2019 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 3,358.0( Tota I : 3.358.0( Page: 13 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239729 11/27/2019 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice INV-056544 239730 11/27/2019 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER Dec Cigna Premiums 239731 11/27/2019 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 239732 11/27/2019 077290 LOPEZ, ROJELIO 239733 11/27/2019 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 20432 expenses N K3 239734 11/27/2019 076626 MCCANN TRUCKING AND EXCAVATING EBDC.Pmt 3 PO # Description/Account STREET - SMARTTOOL & CASE STREET - SMARTTOOL & CASE 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 Total DECEMBER CIGNA PREMIUMS December CIGNA premiums 811.000.231.550 Total 10-19 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPE 10-19 reimbursement for expenses - 1 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 10-19 reimbursement for expenses - 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 Total ElCA.SERVICES THRU 11/15/19 ElCA.Services thru 11/15/19 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 ElCA.SERVICES THRU 11/22/19 ElCA.Services thru 11/22/19 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 Total INV 79569 - EDMONDS PD TOW BLUE LEXUS- CS19- 29146 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total EBDC.PMT 3 THRU 11/13/19 EBDC.Pmt 3 thru 11/13/19 7.2.b Page: 14 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 239734 11/27/2019 076626 MCCANN TRUCKING AND EXCAVATING (Continued) 239735 11/27/2019 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 239736 11/27/2019 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS PO # Description/Account 112.000.68.595.61.65.00 EBDC.Pmt 3 thru 11/13/19 125.000.68.595.61.65.00 EBDC.Pmt 3 thru 11/13/19 126.000.68.595.61.65.00 EBDC.Ret. 3 112.000.223.400 Total 316994 SEWER - OIL SEWER - OIL 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total 25066 FAC - REPAIRED SEALS AND LEAK FAC - REPAIRED SEALS AND LEAK 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 25074 FIRE STATION 16 - 2019 ROOF CLE FIRE STATION 16 - 2019 ROOF CLE 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 25075 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - 201 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - 201 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 PN 4860 MINI PARK ROOF DOWN PAYMENT MINI PARK ROOF DOWN PAYMENT 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 7.2.b Page: 15 Amoun c 7,393.9( 844.7E a 844.7E 3 c -454.1, 8,629.21 Y U m t U E 76.9( 8.0( O 84.9( > 0 L a a Q 1,375.0( rn 143.0( N T 545.0( E .R U 56.6E m E 385.0( U m 40.01 Q 7,000.0( Page: 15 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 16 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239736 11/27/2019 076264 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS (Continued) Total : 9,544.7: 239737 11/27/2019 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME156226 UNIT 138 - PARTS UNIT 138 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 161.3, Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.5, 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 18.0E Total : 191.91 239738 11/27/2019 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0560692-IN WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 16.0E 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.6, Total : 17.7: 239739 11/27/2019 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0714689-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 33.7� 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 3.5' Total : 37.2E 239740 11/27/2019 075872 NELSON, DENISE DNelson 11.2019 EXPENSE REIMB Reimbursement for Certification Exan 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 209.0( Tota I : 209.0( 239741 11/27/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER August, 2019 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI• PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 0.8' October, 2019 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 989.3 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 239741 11/27/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 239742 11/27/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-439941 3685-440160 7.2.b Page: 17 PO # Description/Account Amoun c PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account d 001.000.237.130 17,897.3E �% Building Code Fee Account a 001.000.237.150 479.5( L State Patrol Death Investigation 3 001.000.237.330 47.2E c Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 4,742.4E Y School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 142.7E U Washington Auto Theft Prevention E 001.000.237.250 1,981.0( 2 Traumatic Brain Injury ,- 001.000.237.260 746.5E o Accessible Communities Acct > 001.000.237.290 148.8" Multi -Model Transportation a 001.000.237.300 148.& Q Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 183.6E ti Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis N 001.000.237.170 1.8( r WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 268.9( Total : 27,779.1( UNIT 93 - PARTS (D UNIT 93 - PARTS E t 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.1; m 10.4% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.2E UNIT 40 - PARTS UNIT 40 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 36.7z Page: 17 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239742 11/27/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS (Continued) r 10.4% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.8, >, Total: 53.9° a (D 239743 11/27/2019 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00095419 UNIT 66 - PARTS 3 UNIT 66 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 430.8, Freight Y 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 52.0( u 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 50.2' E 00095571 UNIT 66 - PARTS M UNIT 66 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 109.31' O Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.9E o 10.4% Sales Tax a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.2,' Q 00095708 E169SD - 2020 VACTOR 2100 PLUS rn E169SD - 2020 VACTOR 2100 PLUS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 488,694.9' N 10.3% Sales Tax r 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 50,335.5E u) Total: 539,704.1( .� 239744 11/27/2019 026830 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY 50464752 FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS z FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 111.91 E 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.6,1 Total: 123.5f Q 239745 11/27/2019 075065 PASSEY, SCOTT November 2019 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT GAS reimbursement for gas for truck that 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 50.0( Page: 18 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239745 11/27/2019 075065 075065 PASSEY, SCOTT 239746 11/27/2019 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 239747 11/27/2019 027450 PAWS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 121783 INV 121783 - EDMONDS PD TOW SILVER BMW- CS 19-29230 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total OCT 2019 239748 11/27/2019 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 20200026 239749 11/27/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 200002411383 200007876143 200011439656 200016558856 200016815843 OCT 2019 -EDMONDS PD 9 ANIMALS @ $200 EA -$170 RCLM 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total WWTP: 2020 OPERATING PERMIT 1 2020 Operating Permit Fees & Surchi 423.000.76.535.80.41.50 Total FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 7.2.b Page: 19 Amoun 50.0( m E �a a 184.0( m L 3 19.3, 203.3: U m t 1,630.0( U 1,630.0( •9 0 R 29,248.3� o 29,248.% Q Q rn 1,552.4E ti N T 35.8, 281.1, m E t 133.7.E r Q 210.2, Page: 19 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 20 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239749 11/27/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 645.3E 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 E >% FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 f° a 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 349.1 E L 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 3 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 189.1 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; U 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 23.4' u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 88.9z M PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 88.9, PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; > 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 88.9, LO- PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : a 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 88.9, Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : M 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 88.9,' 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE N CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE r 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 265.3E N Total: 4,130.5f 239750 11/27/2019 064468 PUGET SOUND VIDEO 11142019 PROF SVCS Prof Svcs: Housing Commission Eve (D 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 995.0( E Total: 995.0( u m r 239751 11/27/2019 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000053134 STORM STREET SWEEPING DUMP Q STORM STREET SWEEPING DUMP 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 3,967.0( 0000053176 STORM STREET SWEEPING DUMP STORM STREET SWEEPING DUMP Page: 20 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239751 11/27/2019 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY (Continued) 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 3,376.5( Total: 7,343.5( 239752 11/27/2019 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 23144 PUBLIC SAFETY - SECURITY CAME PUBLIC SAFETY - SECURITY CAME 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 521.2, Freight 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 19.3E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 56.2, Tota I : 596.75 239753 11/27/2019 077301 RIGHTAT SCHOOL 2002452.009 REFUND: PLAZA ROOM DAMAGE C REFUND: PLAZA ROOM DAMAGE C 001.000.239.200 200.0( Total : 200.0( 239754 11/27/2019 038413 RMT EQUIPMENT P10509 PM SUPPLIES PM SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 65.7, 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.4,' Total : 72.2: 239755 11/27/2019 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-025240 UNIT 88 - BATTERY UNIT 88 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 85.6( 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.9( Total : 94.5( 239756 11/27/2019 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 201571-1 STORMWATER - PARTS STORMWATER - PARTS 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 359.7( 10.3% Sales Tax Page: 21 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 239756 11/27/2019 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO (Continued) 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Tota I : 239757 11/27/2019 071725 SKAGIT HORTICULTURE LLC INV00007083 FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 Total 239758 11/27/2019 037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT I000513962 03-19 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS & Quarterly Liquor Board Profits 001.000.39.566.10.41.50 Quarterly Liquor Excise Taxes 001.000.39.566.10.41.50 Total 239759 11/27/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202547 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200348233 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200865202 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 7.2.b Page: 22 Amoun c 37.0E 396.7E �a a a� L �3 322.5E c �a 33.2, Y 355.71 u t U E 2 1,704.2< U 0 1,228.8" 2,933.0' o L Q a Q 17.7, ti N 40.6, N E 72.3" m E 196.7E m r Q 255.8� 57.3� Page: 22 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 11 /27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239759 11/27/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 23 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 201236825 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS c FISHING PIER RESTROOMS E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 142.6E a 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � L LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 3 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 143.7E 201327111 PINE ST PARK PINE ST PARK Y 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.7, uw 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 19.3" 'R 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME O 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.4' > 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S o LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S a 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 17.8E Q 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W M TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 33.5< N 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! r DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 166.1' . 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 47.6( (D 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / l\ E TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / I\ U 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 m 15.4E 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW Q TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 33.1 E 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME Page: 23 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239759 11/27/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 59.2' 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI f° a 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 138.5" L 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 18.5 1 Total : 1,531.61, Y U 239760 11/27/2019 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER October 2019 Crime Victims Court Remittance t Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 U 402.1( •ii Total: 402.1( u 4- 0 239761 11/27/2019 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE EDMS 2019-12 DEC-2019 FIRE SERVICES CONTR) R Dec-2019 Fire Services Contract Pay o 001.000.39.522.20.41.50 614,893.1 � a Total: 614,893.1 , Q 239762 11/27/2019 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3004895049 INV 3004895049 - CUST 6076358- E M ONE MEDIUM BOX DISPOSAL r. ti 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 53.4, Total : 53.4' r 239763 11/27/2019 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 6704 SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR NO' E M Social media services for November, 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( E 239764 11/27/2019 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18259999 CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES U CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 101.2z Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.51, 18260711 STORM - MARKING PAINT STORM - MARKING PAINT Page: 24 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 239764 11/27/2019 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 55.3E 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 5.7( Tota I : 172.9' 239765 11/27/2019 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV49871 PUBLIC SAFETY- PARTS PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 551.0( Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.1' 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 58.1 E Total: 617.3, 239766 11/27/2019 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN 8000 PHOTOGRAPHY 8000 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CLA, 8000 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CLA, 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 94.0( Total : 94.0( 239767 11/27/2019 073310 UNISAFE INC 706020 WWTP: PO 117 - NITRILE GLOVES PO 117 - NITRILE GLOVES MED. & 1 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 359.6( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 31.8( Total: 391.4( 239768 11/27/2019 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 88651 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 923.4( 89130 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 2,087.2E Total : 3,010.6E 239769 11/27/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9842071028 C/A671247844-00001 Page: 25 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239769 11/27/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 239770 11/27/2019 075485 WA ST DEPT OF LICENSING 239771 11/27/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 239772 11/27/2019 066238 WASHINGTON TRACTOR Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 26 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r Cell Service-Eng c 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 19.91 >% Cell Service Fac-Maint f° a 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 108.1 , L Cell Service-PD 3 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 272.E c Cell Service-PW Street/Storm ra 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 19.91 Y Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 19.91 U Cell Service-PW Water E 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.91 2 Cell Service-PW Sewer - 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 39.0' o Cell Service-WWTP > 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 19.91 Total: 519.4, a Q 7/18-6/19 FLEET - ALL VEHICLES- FUEL ROA M FLEET - ALL VEHICLES- FUEL ROA r. 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 r` 5,136.7E N Total : 5,136.7E r 64004 INV 64004 - EDMONDS PD E TOW GOLD MAZDA- CS 1928903 fd U 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 184.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.3, E Total: 203.3: U m r 1952429 PM SUPPLIES: LIFT LINK, SAFETY; Q PM SUPPLIES: LIFT LINK, SAFETY; 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 840.3< 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 87.3� Page: 26 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 11/27/2019 7:30:09AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 239772 11/27/2019 066238 066238 WASHINGTON TRACTOR 239773 11/27/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 239774 11/27/2019 071104 WIPPEL, TERESA 239775 11/27/2019 076325 WOOTEN, COURTNEY 83 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 83 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.b Page: 27 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total: 927.7: m 11493178 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES E FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES sa 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 a 835.8( m 10.4% Sales Tax 3 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 86.9, Total: 922.7: 19111003 PM: CEMETERY ADVERTISING 1k PM: CEMETERY ADVERTISING: NO m t 130.000.64.536.20.41.40 933.0( U Total : 933.0( •9 DivComm 11022019 DIVERSITY COMMISSION I AM EDIV Diversity Commission "I Am Edmond: 0R 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 150.0( o Total: 150.0( a a Bank total : 1,382,515.3E Q rn Total vouchers : 1,382,515.3E N N E M V C d E t V r El Page: 27 Packet Pg. 73 7.2.c vchlist 11 /27/2019 9:11:38AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 11272019 11/27/2019 076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account Dec 2019 ACCT #00397358 4TH AVE PARKIN( 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - Decerr 001.000.39.542.64.45.00 Total Bank total : Total vouchers : Page Z c a� Amoun E R Q. m L 417.E 1 3 417.6 0 �a 417.61 Y v 417.61 t E M 0 0 a.+ E ZI Page: 1 Packet Pg. 74 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 ESFE STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 ESGA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB E STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA Q STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB 3 SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 EBCE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC Y v STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA c� WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 EBCD E WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC 2 U STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC - STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB Q SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC ti N WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA L a� STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD E UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB M Z WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB o d WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA 2, STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB a STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC u_ STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD c STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC 0) E STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA Q STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 75 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Proiect Engineering Accounting Proiect Funding Proiect Title Number Number STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 11 c488 E6GB STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement c477 E6MB STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase 111) c405 E2AD STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c540 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STR Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA c m E M L 3 c M Y V N t c� E v 4- 0 O CL O. Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 76 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements nffwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study E3DB 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Make Ballinger Associated Projects STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4GB Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab rackside Warning System STIR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project treet Waterfront Connector STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR ESGB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating UTILITIES s010 Standard Details Updat STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Citywide Protected missive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) ADA Transition Plan STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E61FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project Q Veteran's Plaz Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 77 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title PRK E6MB c477 Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement edestrian Signals STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements E7CD 89th Prff Retaining Wa STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements OVD Slope pair & Stabilization STM E71`13 c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW E7FG NPDES (Studerlff Saving Salmo WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement E7MA aterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront wvelopmenIffRestoration (Pre - Design) STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STIR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements 2018 Overlay Program STIR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CD 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays 18 Minor Sidewalk Project STIR E8D13 i033 ADA Curb Ramps 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study c521 4th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Prc c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacemer 2019 Utility Rate & GFC PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor 2019 Traffic Calming OW STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STIR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i036 2019 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing J STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program E9DC Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design c540 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 78 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accountinq Funding Number Number Project Title PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E31FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive m E STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) Q STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) i STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration 3 STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects M FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Y v WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring t STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I co v SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study G SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System 0 WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Q- Q STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project PRK E6MB c477 Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement ti N STIR E5DB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility L PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza E WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications M Z WTR E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) o L STM E51FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements m STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) to STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II 3 STM E61FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs (D SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project ILL WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project r E STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW t c� PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Q WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project FAC E9MA c540 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 79 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accountinq Funding Number Number Project Title STM E61FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals m E STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall M sZ STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i STIR EBAA i027 2018 Traffic Calming 3 STIR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive M STIR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Y v STIR EBCB i030 2018 Overlay Program t STIR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E STIR EBDA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project co v STIR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps G WTR EBCD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR EBCE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays 0 STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Q- Q STIR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming ti N STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing L STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program E STIR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program M Z WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay o L STIR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) m STIR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades to STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) 2' c PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) 3 STM E71FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization (D UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates ILL r SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study E UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Q STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STIR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STM E91FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 80 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c540 E9MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement c477 E6MB PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA +� c PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA m E PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA M sZ PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA i STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 ESFE 3 STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB M STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE Y v STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA t STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC E STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB v STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E91FA G STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC 0 STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD Q' Q STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E31FE ti N STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA L a� STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB Z STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD O STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC m STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA to STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA a STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC u_ STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB c STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA 0) E STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB c� tc STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA Q STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 81 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) i044 E9DC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide Cl PP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 E8,113 UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA c d E M L 3 C M to Y V N t E v 4- 0 R O CL om Revised 11/27/2019 Packet Pg. 82 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Ordinance amending Edmonds City Code Title 4 and Edmonds Community Development Code Title 20 to Align with State Business License Service Practices Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History In the 2017 session, the State Legislature passed Engrossed House Bill 2005 (RCW 35.90), which required all cities with a local business license requirement to administer their business license through the state's Business Licensing Service (BLS). Shortly thereafter, the City of Edmonds was put on the schedule to start the partnering process. The City worked with the BLS to prepare for and effectuate this change. Since May 16, 2019, businesses now apply for their Edmonds business license via BLS, which issues their state business license. On May 14, 2019, a proposal to update the business licensing chapter of City Code to reflect the partnership with BLS was presented to the Council Finance Committee. The Committee consensus was to direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance to make these changes and adopt on a future Consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Adopt the ordinance, aligning the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code with WA State BLS practices. Narrative This is essentially a housekeeping item to clean up the code to reflect the partnership with the BLS. Through the enactment of RCW 35.90 and our executed interlocal agreement, the BLS is fully authorized to accept and process business license applications on behalf of the City of Edmonds. Updating Titles 4 and 20 simply brings our code in conformance with our adopted process. Attached is a reference index of the proposed changes to various chapters of ECC Titles 4 and 20, and the Ordinance with proposed changes in legislative format. Attachments: Pages from 2019-05-14 City Council Minutes Ordinance Business Licensing Title 4 & 20 Revisions Edmonds Muni Code Revision Index 2019 Packet Pg. 83 7.3.a FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING May 14, 2019 Elected Officials Present Councilmember Tom Mesaros Council President Adrianne Fraley-Monillas Staff Present Scott James, Finance Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Al Compaan, Police Chief Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Scott Passey, City Clerk The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. Business License Code Update Ordinance Mr. Passey reported the City is entering into a partnership with the State Business Licensing Service (BLS) to create a uniform process for all cities for business licenses. Effective May 16, businesses will apply online. BLS will provide a daily report of applications submitted; staff will conduct the necessary research with regard to the City's codes, etc. and approve or deny the application and BLS mails the business license. Several housekeeping code changes are necessary to reflect the partnership with BLS. An ordinance will be prepared to enact the code changes. Discussion followed regarding the City's fee and BLS's fee, existing business licenses, aircraft landing permits, and horse taxi permits. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda. 2. 2019 Hourly Employee Positions Mr. James advised the hourly wage chart was historically included in the annual budget book/process but was unintentionally omitted in recent budgets. The salaries for temporary employees are listed by department in the budget book. Discussion followed regarding revisions to the wage chart to reflect changes in minimum wage. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda. 4. March 2019 Quarterly Financial Report Mr. Turley and Mr. James highlighted: • Revenues slightly lower than budget due to property tax receipt in May • Some expenses higher than budget due to annual payments in January, some lower due to expenditures later in the year • Increase in Woodway Law Protection due to new contract • Development related revenues appear down, but Plan Check Fees such as for a 192-unit building on Hwy 99 indicates development revenues will be increasing • Profit & Loss Statement was omitted from this report but will be included in the presentation to Council Action: Schedule for full Council. 3. Approval of Resources for Housing Commission Packet Pg. 84 7.3.b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSES AND AMENDING SECTIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE TITLE 4 AND EDMONDS COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT CODE TITLE 20 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS LICENSE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds requires certain businesses to obtain business licenses; and WHEREAS, Engrossed House Bill (EHB) 2005 was passed by the Washington State Legislature with an effective date of July 23, 2017; and WHEREAS, EHB 2005 is intended to simplify the administration of municipal general business licenses for the applicants and improve the business climate; and WHEREAS, EHB 2005 requires that all cities with business licenses administer business licensing through the state's business license system (BLS) by 2027 or through the FileLocal system by 2020; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has administered its business licensing through BLS beginning in May, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Code and Edmonds Community Develop Code require amendments in order to align with BLS business practices; NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY C] 317.11101 M-1 elwe]ldf.1i Section 1. Amendment. Sections 4.11.010, 4.11.020, 4.12.020, 4.24.010, 4.32.020, 4.40.020, 4.44.020, 4.48.020, 4.50.030, 4.50.080, 4.52.060, 4.56.010, 4.60.020, 4.72.010, 4.72.020, 4.72.021, 4.72.030, 4.72.040, 4.75.010, 4.85.020, 4.90.020 of Edmonds City Code Title 4 entitled "Licenses" is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A (deleted text in stril eugk, added text in underline) , and adopted herein by reference. Packet Pg. 85 7.3.b Section 2. Amendment. Section 20.20.010 of Edmonds Community and Development Code entitled "Home Occupation" is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit B (deleted text in *r4'��, added text in underline), and adopted herein by reference. Section 3: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance or any city code section amended hereby should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance or the amended code section. Section 4: Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5: Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING 2 Packet Pg. 86 7.3.b JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. November, 2019 November, 2019 November, 2019 November, 2019 416X 3 Packet Pg. 87 7.3.b SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.416X of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the XX day of November, 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSES AND AMENDING EDMONDS CITY CODE TITLE 4 AND TITLE 20 TO UPDATE ITEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS LICENSING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of November, 2019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 0 Packet Pg. 88 7.3.c Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.11 MOTOR VEHICLE WRECKERS Chapter 4.11 MOTOR VEHICLE WRECKERS Sections: 4.11.010 Definitions. 4.11.020 License required. 4.11.030 Records to be kept. 4.11.040 Improper practices. 4.11.050 Location and appearance of place of business. 4.11.060 Penalties. 4.11.300 Severability. 4.11.010 Definitions. The following words and phrases as used in this chapter shall have the following meanings: A. "Department" means the Washington State Department of Motor Vehiele Licensing. Page 6/107 B. "Established place of business" means a building or enclosure which the owner occupies either continuously or at regular periods and where his books and records are kept and business is transacted and which must conform with the zoning regulations of the city of Edmonds. C. "Motor vehicle wrecker" means every person, firm, partnership, association or corporation engaged in the business of buying, selling or dealing in vehicles of a type required to be licensed under the laws of this state, for the purpose of wrecking, dismantling, disassembling or substantially changing the form of any motor vehicle or trailers, or who buys or sells integral secondhand parts of component material thereof, in whole or in part, and deals in secondhand motor vehicle parts. [Ord. 1918 § 1, 1977]. 4.11.020 License required. Before engaging in the business of wrecking motor vehicles or trailers, every motor vehicle wrecker must have a current, valid state license issued by the department authorizing him to do so, as well as any business license that may b�quired pursuant to Chapter 4.72 ECC. The owner shall cause the license to be prominently displayed in his place of business where it may be inspected by an investigating officer or police officer at any time. [Ord. 1918 § 3, 1977]. 4.11.030 Records to be kept. A. Every motor vehicle wrecker shall maintain books or files in which he shall keep a record and a description of every vehicle wrecked, dismantled, disassembled or substantially altered by him, together with the name of the person, firm or corporation from whom he purchased the vehicle. Such record shall also contain: 1. The certificate of title number (if previously titled in this or any other state); 2. Name of state where last registered; 3. Number of the last license number plate issued; 4. Name of vehicle; 5. Motor or identification number and serial number of the vehicle; 6. Date purchased; 7. Disposition of the motor and chassis, and such other information as the department may require. B. A motor vehicle wrecker shall also maintain a similar record of all disabled vehicles that have been towed or transported to the motor vehicle wrecker's place of business or his representative. This record shall specify the name The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 89 7.3.c Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.12 PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS AND STREET VENDORS Chapter 4.12 PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS AND STREET VENDORS Sections: 4.12.010 Definitions. 4.12.020 License required. 4.12.030 License fees. 4.12.040 License application — Information required. 4.12.050 Investigation of applicants. 4.12.055 Street vendor requirements. 4.12.060 Issuance of license — Expiration. 4.12.065 Soliciting and peddling restrictions. 4.12.070 Carrying of license required. 4.12.080 Revocation of license. 4.12.085 Appeal procedure. 4.12.090 Purchase orders — Form and content. 4.12.100 Penalties. 4.12.110 Severability. Page 8/107 4.12.010 Definitions. A. "Solicitor" or "peddler" means any person who shall sell, offer for or expose for sale, or who shall trade, deal or traffic in any goods or services in the city by going from house to house or from place to place or by indiscriminately approaching individuals. 1. Sales by sample or for future delivery, and executory contracts of sale by solicitors or peddlers are included; provided, however, that this section shall not be deemed applicable to any salesman or canvasser who solicits trade from wholesale or retail dealers in the city. 2. Any person who, while selling or offering for sale any goods, services or anything of value, stands in a doorway, any unenclosed vacant lot, parcel of land, or in any other place not used by such person as a permanent place of business shall be deemed a solicitor or peddler within the meaning of this chapter, except as noted in subsection (B) of this section. B. "Street vendor" means any person who shall sell food, flowers, nonalcoholic beverages only, and/or other goods or services from either a motorized or nonmotorized mobile vending unit. C. "Motorized mobile vending unit" means a truck, van or other motorized vehicle that incorporates a kitchen or other food preparation area from which prepared or prepackaged food may be sold. D. "Nonmotorized mobile vending unit" means a cart, kiosk or other device capable of being pushed by one person, with at least two functional wheels and positive wheel -locking devices. [Ord. 3902 § 1 (Att. A), 2012; Ord. 3513 § 1, 2004; Ord. 2536 § 1, 1985; Ord. 830 § 1, 1960]. 4.12.020 License required. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to act as solicitor, peddler or street vendor within the meaning and application of this chapter unless that person or his/her employer shall have first secured a license in the manner provided in this chapter.. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may b�quired under Chapter 4.72 ECC. 1. Any person who shall sell, deliver or peddle any dairy product, meat, poultry, eel, fish, mollusk, or shellfish must first obtain a license pursuant to this chapter. 2. No licenses shall be issued or maintained for the sale of poultry or poultry products or meat or meat products which are adulterated or distributed under unsanitary conditions. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 90 7.3.c Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.24 GAME LICENSES Chapter 4.24 GAME LICENSES Sections: 4.24.010 License required. 4.24.020 License fee. 4.24.025 Application forms. 4.24.026 Police investigation and issuance of video game arcade license. 4.24.027 Video game arcades — Location and hours of operation. 4.24.030 Pool or billiard rooms — Hours of operation. 4.24.040 Pool or billiard room license — When not granted. 4.24.050 Revocation of license. 4.24.100 Penalty for violations. Page 18/107 4.24.010 License required. A. Operator's License. It is unlawful for any person, corporation, partnership, firm, or other association to keep, operate, or allow the operation of any pool table, billiard table, automatic amusement game or so-called game of skill including video games and pinball machines, juke box or other automatic music machine open to the public at large, including private clubs, within the city of Edmonds without having first procured an operator's license from the city clerk and having paid the amount of such license fee to the city. B. Video Game Distributor's License. It is unlawful for any person, corporation, partnership, firm, or other association to lease or rent to, or place with an operator any automatic amusement game or so-called game of skill that is a video game within the city of Edmonds without having first procured a video game distributor's license from the city clerk and having paid the amount of such license fee to the city. C. Video Game Arcade License. It is unlawful for any person, corporation, partnership, firm, or other association to manage, operate, own or otherwise control a business having 10 or more automatic amusement game machines or devices commonly known as video games within the same building without first obtaining and annually renewing a video game arcade license. [Ord. 2288 § 1, 1982; Ord. 2276 § 1, 1982; Ord. 2253 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2173 § 1, 1980; Ord. 1766 § 25, 1975; Ord. 556 § 5, 1946]. D. The licenses required under this chapter are all in addition to a business license that may b�quired under Chapter 4.72 ECC. 4.24.020 License fee. A. Operator's License Fee. The license fee for the operator's license required under ECC 4.24.010(A), excluding video games, shall be $25.00 per year for each table, game and/or machine. The license fee for video games shall be $50.00 per year per machine. B. Video Game Distributor's License Fee. The license fee for the video game distributor's license required under ECC 4.24.010(B) shall be $300.00 per year. C. Expiration and Half Year Licenses. All licenses required by ECC 4.24.010 shall expire on December 31 st of each respective year and all licenses taken out after June 30th of each respective year shall pay one-half of the annual license fee for that year and upon such payment shall be issued a license for the remaining portion of said calendar year. D. Video Game Arcade License Fee. The license fee for the video game arcade license shall be according to the following schedule: 1. $200.00 if the business has 10 to 20 video games within one building. 2. $300.00 if the business has 21 to 30 video games within one building. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 91 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.32 PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS Chapter 4.32 PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS Sections: 4.32.010 Definitions. 4.32.020 License required — Exceptions. 4.32.030 Procedure. 4.32.040 Police/fire investigation — Approval. 4.32.050 Issuance of license. 4.32.060 License fees/term. 4.32.070 Revocation of licenses. 4.32.080 Notice of revocation — Appeal. 4.32.090 Emergency suspension of license. 4.32.100 Acceptance of chapter terms. 4.32.110 Penalties. 4.32.200 Severability. 4.32.010 Definitions. A. "Person" shall mean any individual, firm, corporation, partnership or unincorporated association. B. "Police chief' and "fire chief' shall include his/her designee. Page 23/107 C. "Public amusement" means circuses, carnivals, motion picture shows, exhibitions, concerts, side shows, vaudeville, amusement parks and any other form of diversion, pastime or recreation conducted for and open to the public regardless of whether an admission fee or other charge is made for attendance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the licensing and inspection of an activity conducted under the auspices of a bona fide, accredited grade school, middle school, high school or college and conducted on the premises thereof in facilities previously inspected and approved for public assembly. [Ord. 2671, 1988; Ord. 2653 § 1, 1988; Ord. 2175 § 1, 1980]. 4.32.020 License required — Exceptions. A. No person shall conduct any public amusement within the city of Edmonds until he has first obtained a license therefor and has paid all fees required by this chapter. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may b�quired under Chapter 4.72 ECC. B. No fee shall be required for the application of a nonprofit, charitable or religious community organization. [Ord. 2671, 1988; Ord. 2175 § 1, 1980]. 4.32.030 Procedure. A. Persons required to obtain licenses shall make application to the city clerk on forms provided therefor. B. The application shall contain the following information: 1. The name, address and telephone number of the person requesting the license, and if other than a natural person, the names of all officers and/or partners. 2. The type of public amusement, duration and hours of operation, and location. A sketch showing the location, size and arrangement of facilities shall be included with the application. 3. The number of employees and the number of expected customers. 4. Such other information as required by the city clerk in order to carry out the intent of this chapter (such as insurance) as may be required. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 92 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.40 PUBLIC DANCES Chapter 4.40 PUBLIC DANCES Sections: 4.40.010 Public dance defined. 4.40.020 License required — Fee — Hours of operation. 4.40.030 Police officer required — Powers and duties. 4.40.040 Penalty for violations. Page 27/107 4.40.010 Public dance defined. For the purpose of this chapter, any dance for which an admission or entrance fee is charged shall be considered a public dance, whether the attendance be upon invitation or otherwise. [Ord. 2174 § 1, 1980; Ord. 349 § 1, 1923]. 4.40.020 License required — Fee — Hours of operation. A. Required. Any person, corporation, firm, partnership or other association other than those exempted in subsection B of this section, desiring to conduct a public dance within the corporate limits of the city of Edmonds shall first procure from the city clerk a license granting them the right to conduct such dance. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. B. Exempt Organizations. The following shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter: 1. Nonprofit civic, charitable or religious organizations. 2. Public and/or private schools licensed by the state of Washington. 3. Holders of a valid cabaret license under Chapter 4.48 ECC. 4. Holders of a valid teen dance license under Chapter 4.44 ECC. C. Application Information. Application for a license under this chapter shall be made to the city clerk on forms provided by the city. The application shall contain the following information: 1. The name and address of the person or persons who will be present at the dance and responsible for seeing that the terms and conditions of the license are complied with. 2. The number of expected guests and the hours within which the dance is to be conducted. 3. Whether any alcoholic beverages are to be served or consumed on the premises. 4. Such other information as may be required by the city clerk for proper administration of this chapter. D. Review — Fee. The person or persons listed in subsection 13(1) of this section shall sign the application. The fee for the license shall be $25.00. Upon receipt of the completed application and fee, the city clerk shall forward the application to the police chief. Upon review by the police chief, the city clerk shall issue the license. E. Contents. The license shall state on its face the date for which it is issued and shall expire at 2:00 a.m. of the day following the date for which it is issued. [Ord. 2572 § 1, 1986; Ord. 2174 § 1, 1980; Ord. 490, 1933; Ord. 349 § 2, 1923]. 4.40.030 Police officer required — Powers and duties. The police chief may require, as a condition of issuance of the license, an off -duty police officer to be in attendance, which officer shall have the duty of seeing that such public dance is conducted in an orderly and lawful manner and according to the terms of the license. The licensee shall be responsible for reimbursing the off -duty police officer for the time spent. [Ord. 2174 § 1, 1980; Ord. 349 § 3, 1923]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 93 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.44 TEEN DANCE HALLS Chapter 4.44 TEEN DANCE HALLS Sections: 4.44.010 Definitions. 4.44.020 License — Required — Fee — Renewals. 4.44.030 License — Exemption and waiver of payment. 4.44.040 License — Application. 4.44.050 License — Refusal to grant. 4.44.070 License — Revocation. 4.44.072 Teen dance — Age restrictions. 4.44.074 Teen dance — Readmission fee. 4.44.076 Access — Public safety officer — Director. 4.44.078 License limited to licensee and location. Page 29/107 4.44.010 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter and unless the context plainly requires otherwise, the following definitions are adopted: A. "Teen dance" means any dance that is open to the public and which permits the entry of persons under the age of 18 years and which: (1) is conducted for a profit, direct or indirect; or (2) requires a monetary payment or contribution from the persons admitted. B. "Teen dance hall' means any place or premises where a teen dance is conducted, including but not limited to all parking areas, hallways, bathrooms and all adjoining areas accessible to the public during the dance. C. "Person" includes one or more natural persons, corporations, partnerships or unincorporated associations or other forms of business organization. D. "Police chief' means the Edmonds police chief or his designee. [Ord. 2572 § 3, 1986]. 4.44.020 License — Required — Fee — Renewals. A. It is unlawful for any person to conduct a teen dance within the city of Edmonds without first having obtained and being the holder of a valid and subsisting license for such activity, to be known as a teen dance license. The fee for a teen dance license is $300.00. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. B. The entire annual license fee shall be paid for the applicable calendar year regardless of when the application for license is made, and shall not be prorated for any part of the year except that if the original application for license is made subsequent to June 30th, the license fee for the remainder of that year shall be one-half of the annual license fee. Annual license renewals shall be required to be obtained and paid in full by January 31 st of each respective calendar year; provided, however, for calendar year 1986, teen dance licenses shall be obtained and paid in full on or before September 1, 1986. C. There shall be assessed and collected by the clerk an additional charge computed as a percentage of the license fee, on renewal applications not made on or before the expiration date, as follows: Additional Percentage of Days Past Due License Fee 7 — 30 25% 31 — 60 50% 61 and over 100% The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 94 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.48 CABARET DANCES Chapter 4.48 CABARET DANCES Sections: 4.48.010 Cabaret defined. 4.48.020 License fee. 4.48.025 Inspection fee. 4.48.030 License application and issuance. 4.48.040 Regulations applicable to cabaret dances. 4.48.050 Inspection of cabarets. 4.48.060 Dancing — Hours of operation. 4.48.070 Revocation of license — Hearing procedure — Appeal. 4.48.080 Penalty for violations. 4.48.300 Severability. Page 33/107 4.48.010 Cabaret defined. For the purposes of this chapter, a "cabaret" is defined as any public place of business, except a teen dance hall as defined in Chapter 4.44 ECC, wherein food or beverages are dispensed and dancing is allowed or permitted without charge. [Ord. 2572 § 2, 1986; Ord. 594 § 2, 1949]. 4.48.020 License fee. The license fee for operating a cabaret shall be $25.00 per year; the year to run from the date of the issuance of such license. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 594 § 3, 1949]. 4.48.025 Inspection fee. In addition to the license fee referenced in this chapter, the applicant shall pay a charge equal to the actual cost of inspecting the premises in accordance with the provisions of ECDC 19.75.065. [Ord. 3452 § 4, 2003]. 4.48.030 License application and issuance. Any person, firm, corporation or other entity desiring a cabaret license shall make application to the city clerk, which application shall specify the name and address of all owners or other person interested or having a proprietary interest in the premises, specify the type of music to be presented and the hours and days that cabaret dancing shall be conducted, together with such other information as may be requested from time to time by the city council. The license fee shall accompany the application for license and shall not be prorated for any portion of a year. Licenses issued under this chapter may be issued by the city clerk only after approval by the city council. [Ord. 1762 § 1, 1975; Ord. 594 § 4, 1949]. 4.48.040 Regulations applicable to cabaret dances. Closing hours, health and fire restrictions, conduct of patrons, lighting level in rooms and all other general and special regulations of the existing ordinances of the city of Edmonds or as they shall be amended or added to from time to time, relating to dances and dancing, and as regard morality and decency shall be effective as to and govern dances permitted under this chapter except as otherwise provided in this chapter; provided, however, the city council shall have the right to require that special police officers, as provided for in Chapter 4.40 ECC, be in attendance as a condition of the granting of any license under this chapter; provided, further, the city shall have the right to review the need for special police officers in attendance at any dances licensed hereunder and may require the presence of such officers after a license has been issued if such is found to be necessary for the public hearing in the manner as provided in ECC 4.48.070. [Ord. 1762 § 2, 1975; Ord. 372 § 3, 1925]. 4.48.050 Inspection of cabarets. It is unlawful for the owner of any hotel, restaurant or cafe where dancing is carried on, his agent or employee, to refuse admission to any public officer for the purpose of inspecting such hotel, restaurant or cafe to see if the ordinances of the city of Edmonds with reference to health, regulations, prevention of fire hazards and morality and decency in the city are being complied with in said place. [Ord. 372 § 5, 1925]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 95 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.50 LICENSING OF PUBLIC MASSAGE PARLORS AND PUBLIC BATHHOUSES Page 36/107 D. "Massage parlor" means a place where massages are given or furnished for, or in expectation of, any fee, compensation or monetary consideration. E. "Massage parlor attendant" means any person who administers to, or performs services for, patrons of a massage parlor or who supervises the work of a masseur or masseuse or other person administering to, or performing services to, such patrons. The term does not include a person who performs only custodial or janitorial work. F. "Masseur" or "masseuse" means a person engaged in the practice of massage and shall be referred to herein only as "masseur". G. "Person" means any individual, firm, partnership, association, company, or organization of any kind. H. "Public bathhouse" means any place where baths or facilities for baths of any kind whatever are given or furnished and the terms shall include but not be limited to: Finnish baths; Russian baths; sauna baths; Swedish baths; Turkish baths; baths by hot air, steam, vapor, water or electric cabinet; provided, that such term shall not include ordinary tub or shower baths where attendant is not required. I. "Public bathhouse attendant" means any person who administers to, or performs services for, patrons of a public bathhouse or who supervises the work of such a person. The term does not include a person who performs only custodial or janitorial work. [Ord. 1823 § 1, 1976; Ord. 1684 § 2, 1973]. 4.50.020 Exemptions. A. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to: 1. Any person giving massage treatments or baths in a private residence who operates as a sole proprietorship, owns and resides at the private residence and employs no other person or persons; 2. Persons giving massage treatments or baths in a nonprofit, bona fide charitable club, a private social club or a public or private athletic club; 3. Athletic coaches or trainers affiliated with public or private educational institutions or athletic organizations; 4. Students enrolled in schools of massage performing such practices of massage as are incidental to their course of study; 5. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to massage treatments given in any hospital, duly licensed nursing or convalescent home, or by physical therapist or massage therapist duly licensed, who treat patients upon written prescription or direction of a duly licensed health care professional authorized by the state of Washington to treat the sick, injured, or infirm, or by any nurse under the direction of a person so licensed; 6. Licensed beauty operators and barbers who perform only such acts of scalp or facial massage as are customarily given in beauty salons and barbershops for purposes of beautification only are also exempt from the provisions of this chapter; 7. Massage parlors where all massage services are performed solely by massage therapists duly licensed in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. B. The applicant shall have the initial burden of proof of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that he/she/it falls within any of the exceptions created by this section in any proceeding, administrative, civil or criminal. [Ord. 2914 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2609 § 1, 1987; Ord. 2554 § 1, 1986; Ord. 2497, 1985; Ord. 1700, 1974; Ord. 1684 § 3, 1973]. 4.50.030 License required — Massage parlor and public bathhouse. It is unlawful to conduct, operate, or maintain a massage parlor, or public bathhouse unless such establishment or premises is licensed as provided in this chapter. The license required by this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 1823 § 2, 1976; Ord. 1684 § 4, 1973]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 96 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 40/107 Chapter 4.50 LICENSING OF PUBLIC MASSAGE PARLORS AND PUBLIC BATHHOUSES B. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.108 RCW as a licensed massage therapist. [Ord. 2609 § 4, 1987]. C. A person providing such services as an independent contractor may also be required to obtain a business license under Chapter 4.72 ECC. 4.50.130 City clerk to issue licenses. A. Massage Parlor, Sauna Parlor and Public Bathhouse License. If, from the information supplied the city clerk, it appears that the application and the premises are fit and proper, and the statements contained in the application are true and complete, and that the applicant or the owners of the application firm have not been convicted of violating the provisions of state statute or any local ordinance regulating the provisions of massage services or the operation of a massage parlor, public bathhouse or body studio and that the applicant has complied with all the requirements of this code, the city clerk shall issue a license for the business to the applicant, otherwise the license application shall be denied. B. No person shall operate a massage parlor or public bathhouse until a license has been approved in the manner specified by this chapter. C. No massage business license shall be issued for a business premises presently under suspension pursuant to action under this chapter, nor for a period of six months following the date of a revocation pursuant to the terms of this chapter. D. Massage Parlor, Sauna Parlor, Body Painting Studio and Public Bathhouse Attendant License. If in the information supplied to the city clerk it appears that: 1. The applicant is a fit and proper person to serve as a massage parlor, sauna parlor, body painting studio or public bathhouse attendant; 2. The statements contained in the application are true and complete; 3. The applicant has not been convicted of violating the provisions of state statute or any local ordinance relating to the provision of massage services, the operation of a massage parlor, sauna parlor, public bathhouse or body studio and has not committed any offense of prostitution or other similar sexual offense which is a crime under the statutes of any state; and 4. The applicant has complied with all the requirements of this code, then the city clerk shall issue license for the business to the applicant; otherwise the license application shall be denied. [Ord. 2609 § 5, 1987; Ord. 2554 § 5, 1986; Ord. 1829, 1976; Ord. 1823 § 11, 1976; Ord. 1684 § 14, 1973]. 4.50.140 Denial of license — Hearing. Any applicant whose application has been denied may, within 10 days following notification of the denial, file a petition for a hearing with the city council. The city council shall set a hearing date within 30 days of receiving such request. [Ord. 1684 § 15, 1973]. 4.50.150 Liquor, controlled substances — Prohibited — Exception. A. Liquor, as that term is defined by the Washington State Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, shall not be distributed or consumed on any premises under regulation by this chapter, unless the premises is licensed to serve the same by the Washington State Liquor Control Board. B. Controlled substances, as defined by the Washington State Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and/or ordinances of the city of Edmonds, shall not be distributed or consumed on any premises under regulation by this chapter. [Ord. 1684 § 16, 1973]. 4.50.160 Hours of operation. All massage businesses shall be closed and all services performed therein discontinued between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 8:00 a.m. [Ord. 1823 § 12, 1976; Ord. 1684 § 17, 1973]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 97 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.52 REGULATIONS FOR ADULT ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES Page 46/107 1. Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, anus, or areola of the female breasts or any artificial depiction of the same; or 2. Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered. R. "Specified criminal activities" shall mean and include any conviction for acts which constitute sexual crimes against children, sexual abuse, rape, distribution of obscenity or erotic material to minors, prostitution, pandering, or racketeering. S. "Specified sexual activity" shall mean and include any of the following: 1. The fondling or other intentional touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, anus, or female breasts; or 2. Sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including intercourse, oral copulation, or sodomy; or 3. Masturbation, actual or simulated; or 4. Human genitals or artificial depictions of the same in a state of sexual stimulation, arousal or tumescence; or 5. Excretory functions as part of or in connection with any of the activities set forth in subdivisions 1 through 4 of this subsection. T. "Transfer of ownership or control' shall mean and include any of the following: 1. The sale, lease, or sublease of an adult entertainment facility, or substantially all of the assets of an adult entertainment facility; or 2. The transfer of securities which constitute a controlling interest in the adult entertainment facility, whether by sale, exchange, or similar means; or 3. The establishment of a trust, gift, or other similar legal device which transfers the ownership or control of the adult entertainment facility, except for transfer by bequest or other operation of law upon the death of a person possessing the ownership or control. [Ord. 3097 § 4, 1996]. 4.52.040 Prohibition. A person shall not use any property or establishment for an adult entertainment facility within the city of Edmonds, except as allowed in this chapter and the Edmonds Community Development Code. [Ord. 3097 § 4, 1996]. 4.52.050 Regulated uses. All adult entertainment facilities are subject to the provisions of the Community Development Code and the regulations contained in this chapter. [Ord. 3097 § 4, 1996]. 4.52.060 License required. A. It shall be unlawful to operate an adult entertainment facility without a valid adult entertainment facility license, issued by the city for the particular type of adult entertainment to be conducted. The license or licenses required under this chapter are in addition to a business license that may b�quired under Chapter 4.72 ECC. B. The city clerk, or his/her designee, is responsible for granting, denying, revoking, renewing, suspending, and canceling adult entertainment facility licenses. The director of the department of planning or his/her designee is responsible for ascertaining whether a license application for a proposed adult entertainment facility complies with all requirements enumerated herein and all other applicable zoning laws and/or regulations. C. An application for an adult entertainment facility license shall be made on a form provided by the city. D. The completed application shall contain the following information and shall be accompanied by the following documents: The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 98 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.56 SOUND TRUCKS Chapter 4.56 SOUND TRUCKS Sections: 4.56.010 License required — Fee — Hours of operation. 4.56.020 Penalty for violations. Page 57/107 4.56.010 License required — Fee — Hours of operation. It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or institution to operate a sound truck or mobile public address system over, upon, across and adjacent to the streets and alleys within the corporate limits of the city of Edmonds, until or unless a license to operate the same shall be obtained by paying to the city clerk the sum of $25.00 for each and every day the sound truck or mobile public address system is to be operated in the city of Edmonds; provided, that under no condition shall the sound truck or mobile public address system be operated other than between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.; provided, further, that the mayor in his discretion may waive the license fee for certain public, charitable or school organizations, but the hours during which the sound truck or mobile public address system may be operated will remain the same. The license required under this chapter is in addition to a business license that may b�quired under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 825 § 1, 1960]. 4.56.020 Penalty for violations. Any person, firm, corporation, organization or institution found guilty of violating any of the terms or provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $250.00, or imprisonment in the city jail for a period not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. [Ord. 825 § 2, 1960]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 99 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 59/107 Chapter 4.60 TAXICABS 4.60.020 Operator's license — Required. No person shall operate or permit a motor vehicle owned or controlled by him to be operated as a taxicab unless he has first obtained an operator's license. The license or licenses required under this chapter are in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 1955 § 2, 1977; Ord. 657 § 2, 1954]. 4.60.030 Operator's license — Application. The application for an operator's license shall be made on forms furnished by the city clerk. The completed application shall be signed and sworn to by the applicant before a notary public or some other officer duly authorized to administer oaths. At the time of making application for an operator's license, the applicant shall pay the fee as set forth in ECC 4.60.090. [Ord. 1955 § 3, 1977; Ord. 657 § 3, 1954]. 4.60.040 Operator's license — Information required. A. The applicant's name, driver's license number, date of birth and place of birth; B. The applicant's place of residence and the length of time he has resided in the city, if applicable; C. The applicant's last place of employment with the name and address and telephone number of the employer; D. Whether the applicant or any of his employees are presently or have been previously licensed, or have previously applied for a license, as a taxicab driver or operator; and, if so, where, when and whether or not a license has ever been suspended, revoked or denied and by what jurisdiction and for what cause; E. Whether or not the applicant or any of his employees have ever been convicted of or forfeited bail for a crime, including all traffic offenses for the preceding five years, and, if so, the number of such convictions, approximate dates thereof, and the name of the courts, the crime of which charged, and the final disposition of the case or cases; F. The number of vehicles to be operated or controlled by the applicant and the name, model, year, vehicle identification number, and vehicle license number of each vehicle; G. A list of the names, driver's license numbers, date of birth and addresses of all employees; H. The applicant's financial status including any and all unpaid judgments and the nature of the transaction or acts giving rise to said judgments; I. The name under which the applicant intends to operate; J. Proof of insurance as required by ECC 4.60.100; K. Such other and further information as may be required by the police department. [Ord. 1955 § 4, 1977; Ord. 657 § 4, 1954]. 4.60.050 Operator's license — Investigation. Upon completion of the application and payment of the fee, the city clerk shall forward copies of the application to the police department. The police department shall investigate to see whether all information contained in the application is true and correct and shall verify that all vehicles to be operated as taxicabs are properly licensed. The police department shall forward its report and recommendations to the city council after its investigation is completed. [Ord. 1955 § 5, 1977; Ord. 657 § 5, 1954]. 4.60.060 Operator's license — Council approval. A. The city council shall approve or disapprove all applications for operator's licenses. B. Before approving an operator's license, the city council shall determine the following: 1. That the applicant is financially sound and has fulfilled the insurance requirements of ECC 4.60.100; 2. That all the requirements of this chapter have been met; 3. That the needs of the public would be served by granting the applicant the operator's license; The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 100 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.72 BUSINESS LICENSE Page 84/107 4. A seller located outside the city merely delivering goods into the city by means of common carrier is not required to register and obtain a business license; provided, that it engages in no other business activities in the city. Such activities do not include those in subsection (C)(3) of this section. The city expressly intends that engaging in business include any activity sufficient to establish nexus for purposes of applying the license fee under the law and the Constitutions of the United States and the state of Washington. Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts. D. Rental Unit. The term "rental unit" shall mean a separate room or apartment leased for human occupancy and contained within a single structure, and shall include the operations of rooming houses, boarders within private residences and the operation of bed and breakfast establishments. E. Private Residence. The term "private residence" shall mean a separate, freestanding structure leased for residential purposes and human occupancy by one "family" as defined by ECDC 21.30.010. F. Day. The term "day" when used in this chapter shall refer to days on which the city of Edmonds City Hall is open for business. Any day which is defined as a holiday by ordinance and any day on which City Hall has been closed by executive order shall not constitute a "day." [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 3900 § 2, 2012; Ord. 3834 § 3, 2011; Ord. 3439 § 1, 2003; Ord. 2562, 1986; Ord. 2536 § 2, 1985; Ord. 2315 § 1, 1982]. G. Business Licensing Service. The term "Business Licensing Service" or "BLS" means the office within the Washington State Department of Revenue providing business licensing services to the City. 4.72.020 Business license required. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, engage in or practice any business in the city of Edmonds without first having obtained a business license from the city. If more than one business is located on a single premises, a separate license shall be required for each separate business conducted, operated, engaged in or practiced. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 3282 § 1, 1999; Ord. 1139 § 1, 1965]. 4.72.021 Threshold exemption. To the extent set forth in this section, the following persons and businesses shall be exempt from the registration, license and/or license fee requirements as outlined in this chapter: A. Any person or business whose annual value of products, gross proceeds of sales, or gross income of the business in the city is equal to or less than $12,000 and who does not maintain a place of business within the city shall be exempt from the general business license requirements in this chapter. The exemption does not apply to regulatory license requirements or activities that require a specialized permit. Tax); 3.20(usiness License Ocetipation affd 4.11 (Metar- Vehicle \E r-eeke -s); 4.12 (Peddlers, Soheitors StreetVeiidor and 4.20 (Liguer Lieense Investigatiens); 4.48 (Cabaret Darfees),- 4.50 (Liceffsing Public Massage Par-lors and Public Bathhouses); of 4.56 (Sound '1'yaeks); .�-60 (Taxicabs); The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 101 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.72 BUSINESS LICENSE Page 85/107 B. Nonprofit organizations or corporations with tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501LZ3) shall require a non-profit business license but are exempt from a license fee. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018]. 4.72.023 Registration of transient accommodations. Repealed by Ord. 3900. [Ord. 2566 § 1, 1986]. 4.72.030 Procedure. A. Application for the business license shall be made :. ^frog to the city clerk upon ^ form provided by the eity clerk, and the applicant shall at the same time deposit with the city clerk in advance the heense fee herein required. The application shall state the natafe and address or addresses of the business or businesses, or proposed business or businesses, of the appliean4, and such other information as requested by the city elerk to the Business Licensing Service, and must include all information required for the licenses requested, and total fees due for all licenses requested, as well as the handlingfee ee required by RCW 19.02.075. rsr�!rye!e!se+se!es:�e.�s!rs�se�e�s!rime!e!sere!:!ee�rss!�r�eerier_�s�rrTe�esrr_eaar !�r�:er_�� C—. B. The city clerk or designee shall presefrt-receive all applications for city business licenses to the maye . The mayor-ci1y clerk or designee shall cause an investigation of the completed application to be made by the proper city officials and shall grant or refuse to grant the license within 15 days of the date of receipt of the application information. If an application is refused the reason for refusal shall be designated on the application. The application fee shall not be refunded, except under the following circumstances: 1. An applicant requests cancellation of a license application from the city within five business dam submitting an application to the Business Licensing Service. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 1139 § 1, 1965]. 4.72.040 Fee — Terms — Penalty. A Commencing r.,,,,,ary , 1977, business Business licenses required to be obtained pursuant to this chapter shall be issuedeale.,a,,,.year basis and shag, expire on Deee,,. ber 2, st of the year for " ich they , o,, the date established by the Business Licensing Service. The renewal application must be submitted to the Business Licensing Service, and must contain all information that may be required for all licenses being renewed, and the total fees due for all licenses being renewed, as well as the handlin fee ee required by RCW 19.02.075. B. The annual amounts of-F-e-es-fees for the city business licenses issued hereunder shall be as follows 1. The fee for an application for a new business license for any business that is not a home occupation, as provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any real estate within the city of Edmonds shall be $125.00; 2. The fee for an application for a new business license for a new home occupation business, as provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any residential real estate within the city of Edmonds shall be $100.00; 3. The fee for an application for a new business license for any other business conducted for, under contract with or by providing services to any person within the city, to be operated in locations outside the city limits, shall be $50.00; and 4. The fee for an application for an annual renewal of a city business license shall be $50.00 for any business operated within the city of Edmonds. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 102 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.72 BUSINESS LICENSE Page 86/107 5. A nonprofit business license application shall be exempt from a license fee, provided that the business provides proof of tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501(c)(3). 6. The term and respective fee amount for a license may be prorated to accommodate synchronizing of the city license expiration date with the business license account expiration date established by the Business Licensing Service, C. All businesses required to renew licenses hereunder shall obtain the same and pay all fees required on or before j.,nuar- . 3' st of eaeb -espe tive ye the expiration date established by the Business Licensing Service. Any business which fails to renew and pay the license fees within said period of time shall, in addition to any other penalties provided in this chapter, be assessed a -the penalty for such late application and/or payment required by RCW 19.02.085. The senaltv foF late n—wM-ent made between February lst and February 28th of each business. Failure to renew a license within 120 days after expiration will result in the cancellation of the license. In order to continue business in the city, reapplication for the license is required as provided in this chapter. D. Repealed by Ord. 3036. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 3976 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3710 § 1, 2008; Ord. 3282 § 2, 1999; Ord. 3084 § 1, 1996; Ord. 3036 §§ 1, 2, 1995; Ord. 2191 §§ 1, 2, 1981; Ord. 1828 § 1, 1976; Ord. 1139 § 1, 1965]. 4.72.050 Ineligible activities. Notwithstanding any provisions hereof to the contrary, a license hereunder may not be issued to any person who uses or occupies or proposes to use or occupy any real property or otherwise conducts or proposes to conduct any business in violation of the provisions of any ordinance of the city of Edmonds or the statutes of the state of Washington. The granting of a business license shall in no way be construed as permission or acquiescence in a prohibited activity or other violation of the law. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 1139 § 1, 1965]. 4.72.055 Denial of license — Hearing. In the event that a license is denied under this chapter based on the provisions of ECC 4.72.050, or for any other lawful reason, the applicant may request a hearing. Such request shall be in writing and filed within 10 days of the date of written denial by the city of a license application. A hearing shall be scheduled within 30 days before the hearing examiner. The hearing shall proceed in the following format: A. The applicant/appellant shall present proof of the nature of the activities which it seeks to conduct pursuant to a business license in the city of Edmonds. B. The city shall have the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the activities are in violation of a provision of any ordinance of the city of Edmonds, or the general statutes of the state of Washington. C. The applicant/appellant may then present any rebuttal testimony which it wishes to present. The hearing examiner shall enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. No motion for reconsideration shall be available to either party. Appeal of the final decision shall be to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the applicable laws of the state of Washington. [Ord. 4135 § 1, 2018; Ord. 3834 § 1, 2011]. 4.72.060 Revocation or suspension. The mayor or his designee may, at any time, suspend or revoke any license issued hereunder whenever the licensee or officer or partner thereof has been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of violating any statute of the United States or the state of Washington or any ordinance of the city of Edmonds upon the business premises stated in the license or in connection with the business stated in the license; where the business activity violates ECC 4.72.050; or where the place of business does not conform to the ordinances of the city of Edmonds. Prior to such suspension or revocation, the permittee shall be provided an opportunity for a hearing. The licensee shall be notified in writing by sending a written notice to the address stated on the license of the intention of the city to revoke or suspend said license. The applicant may then appeal by filing written notice with the city clerk within 10 days of the notice of revocation or suspension. The city clerk shall schedule a hearing within 20 days before the hearing The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 103 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.75 PAWNBROKERS Chapter 4.75 PAWNBROKERS Sections: 4.75.010 License required. 4.75.020 Exemption. 4.75.030 Definitions. 4.75.035 Regulatory rule making — By chief of police. 4.75.040 License fees. 4.75.050 Location. 4.75.060 Application for license. 4.75.070 Criteria for denial or revocation of license. 4.75.080 Request for hearing. 4.75.100 Records required. 4.75.110 Records and articles to be available for inspection. 4.75.120 Seller or consignee to give true name and address. 4.75.130 Transcript to be furnished. 4.75.140 Retention of property. 4.75.150 Ammunition sales or storage. 4.75.160 Interest rates. 4.75.170 Police holds. 4.75.180 Transactions with prohibited persons. 4.75.190 Penalty. Page 89/107 4.75.010 License required. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to engage in the business of pawnbroker or secondhand dealer without first obtaining a license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. The license required under this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 2431, 1984]. 4.75.020 Exemption. This chapter shall not apply to any bona fide charitable or nonprofit organization, nor shall it apply to any merchants or dealers whose business is limited to used or secondhand clothing, or to any merchant or dealer whose business is limited to the sale of used or secondhand books. [Ord. 2431, 1984]. 4.75.030 Definitions. A. The term "pawnbroker" as used in this chapter, means and includes every person who takes or receives by way of pledge, pawn or exchange, goods, wares, or merchandise or any kind of personal property whatever, for the repayment of security of any money loaned thereon, or to loan money on deposit of personal property, or who makes public display of any sign indicating that he has money to loan on personal property on deposit or pledge. B. The term "secondhand dealer" as used in this chapter, means and includes every person who as a business engages in the purchase, sale, barter, auction, sale on consignment, or otherwise exchanges secondhand goods, or who keeps a store, shop, room or other place where secondhand goods of any kind or description are bought, sold, traded or bartered, pledged, auctioned, sold on consignment, or otherwise exchanged; provided, however, that this term shall not apply to those persons engaged in the business of selling used or secondhand motor vehicles, boats and other recreational vehicles. Secondhand dealer also includes persons or entities conducting business at flea markets or swap meets, more than three times per year. C. The term "secondhand goods" when used in this chapter means and includes any and all used, remanufactured, or secondhand goods purchased or kept for sale by a dealer in secondhand goods including metal, junk or melted metals; provided, however, such term shall not be construed to include used or secondhand motor vehicles, boats and other recreational vehicles. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 104 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 97/107 Chapter 4.85 HORSE TAXIS Chapter 4.85 HORSE TAXIS Sections: 4.85.010 Definitions. 4.85.020 Activities requiring license. 4.85.030 Vehicle license — Application. 4.85.040 Expiration. 4.85.050 Transfer. 4.85.060 Rates and charges. 4.85.070 Required records. 4.85.080 Licensee obligations. 4.85.090 Police chief requirements. 4.85.100 Driver's license — Application. 4.85.125 License and other related fees. 4.85.130 Issuance. 4.85.140 Display. 4.85.150 Violations. 4.85.010 Definitions. A. A "horse taxi" is a nonmotorized vehicle drawn by a horse, pony, mule, donkey or the like, such as a horse carriage, used for the transportation of passengers and incidental baggage for compensation upon the streets of the city of Edmonds, available for use by the general public. B. An "animal" in this chapter refers to horses, ponies, mules, donkeys or the like, used to draw a horse taxi. [Ord. 2843 § 1, 1991]. 4.85.020 Activities requiring license. No person may own, operate, use, or drive a horse taxi unless the vehicle is licensed under this chapter and no person may drive a horse taxi without a driver's license issued under this chapter. The license required under this chapter is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. [Ord. 2843 § 1, 1991]. 4.85.030 Vehicle license — Application. An applicant for a horse taxi license must submit: A. Proof of ownership or lessee's interest in the vehicle; B. The name and address of the owner of the vehicle; C. The make, model, year of manufacture, color, and any identifying number of the vehicle; D. A certificate of public liability insurance, naming the city as an additional insured, providing coverage for the term of the license applied for, in the minimum amounts of $100,000 for any recovery for death or personal injury by one person, $300,000 for aggregate personal injuries or deaths in any one occurrence and $25,000 for damage to property. The insurance liability limits herein shall be subject to automatic increase if the minimum coverage required by state law is increased for state for -hire vehicle permits, pursuant to Chapter 46.72 RCW. Such policy shall provide minimum 30 days' written notice to the city of the cancellation of the policy or change in the liability limits; and E. The schedule or schedules of rates and charges in the form required by ECC 4.85.060. [Ord. 2843 § 1, 1991] 4.85.040 Expiration. A horse taxi license expires on March 31st of each year. [Ord. 2843 § 1, 1991]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 105 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Chapter 4.90 PUBLIC MARKETS Chapter 4.90 PUBLIC MARKETS Sections: 4.90.010 Definitions. 4.90.020 Activities requiring a license. 4.90.025 Exemptions. 4.90.030 Prohibited activities. 4.90.040 Licensees limited to nonprofit community oriented organizations. 4.90.050 Sponsor licensee — Business license required when. 4.90.060 Repealed. 4.90.070 License fee. 4.90.080 Term of license. 4.90.090 Application for license. 4.90.100 Records. 4.90.110 Administration. 4.90.120 Violation of the provisions of the chapter — Civil infraction. 4.90.010 Definitions. A. "Public market" is defined in ECDC 21.80.103. Page 101/107 B. "Vendor" shall mean any person, association, group, partnership, corporation or firm who exhibits goods or services in a public market provided through a duly licensed sponsor, for the purpose of selling, bartering, trading, exchanging or advertising such goods or services for sale. C. "Sponsor" shall mean any person, association, group, partnership, corporation or firm engaged in the business of providing to any vendor, directly or indirectly, sale spaces, areas or structures within a site licensed for a public market for the purpose of using such location during the term of the market's license. During the study phase in which the ordinance codified in this chapter is effective, the promoter shall be a nonprofit organization as described in ECC 4.90.040. [Ord. 3922, 2013; Ord. 3032 § 1, 1995; Ord. 3015 § 3, 1995]. 4.90.020 Activities requiring a license. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, use or permit property to be used as a public market until the market and site have been licensed under this chapter. No person shall then sell or offer for sale products at any location in conjunction with a market activity until sponsor has been duly licensed and each vendor submitted to the city. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to authorize activities to be conducted in accordance with the market's activities unless appropriately licensed as required under another provision of this code; provided, however, that business license requirements are limited as provided in ECC 4.90.050. For example, pawnbrokers and dealers of secondhand goods shall not conduct activities in accordance with a market until duly licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4.75 ECC. Licensing under the provisions of this chapter shall be an alternative to special event licensing under the authority of the city council or a license for a public amusement as required under Chapter 4.32 ECC, and is in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale goods at a public market unless such person has been listed on the application fee of the licensee and paid the processing requirement specified herein. B. All structures employed on the site shall comply with the requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to the Uniform Building and Fire Code elements. C. The activities of the public market shall be limited to daylight hours on Saturday and Sunday of each week within public rights -of -way, but extended hours are allowed up to 10:00 p.m. for any day of the week if the market takes place outdoors on private property or public property not located within public rights -of -way. Operational hours related to activities of the public market are not limited when the market takes place within a fully enclosed building. [Ord. 3922, 2013; Ord. 3015 § 3, 1995]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 106 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/2 20.20.010 Home occupation. A home occupation may be conducted as a permitted secondary use in any residential zone of the city subject to the following regulations: A. A home occupation shall be a permitted use if it: 1. Is carried on exclusively by a family member residing in the dwelling unit; and 2. Is conducted entirely within the structures on the site, without any significant outdoor activity; and 3. Uses no heavy equipment, power tools or power sources not common to a residence; and 4. Has no pickup or delivery by business related commercial vehicles which exceed 20,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (except for the U.S. mail and standard UPS/FedEx sized delivery vehicles); and 5. Creates no noise, dust, glare, vibration, odor, smoke or other impact adverse to a residential area beyond that normally associated with residential use; and 6. Does not include any employees outside of the family members residing at the residence, including but not limited to persons working at or visiting the subject property; and 7. Complies with all performance criteria established pursuant to ECDC 17.60.010; and 8. Does not park or store more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. B. A home occupation which does not meet one or more of the requirements of subsection (A) of this section may be approved as a staff approval (Type II decision) if the home occupation will not harm the character of the surrounding neighborhood as evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The temporary and permanent keeping of animals associated with a home occupation must comply with all provisions of Chapter 5.05 ECC, Animal Control, and ECDC Title 16; and 2. The home occupation will not include storage, display of goods, building materials and/or the operation of building machinery, commercial vehicles or other tools, unless it meets all of the following criteria: a. Is wholly enclosed within a structure or building; b. Does not emit noise, odor or heat; and c. Does not create glare or emit light from the site in violation of the city's performance criteria; and 3. Does not create a condition which injures or endangers the comfort, or pose health or safety threats to persons on abutting properties or streets; and 4. Does not include visits to the site from more than one nonresident employee per day; and 5. Does not include visits from customers in excess of one vehicle per hour; and 6. Does not include visits from customers between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and 7. If visits to the site are to be made by either an off -site employee or customer, on -site parking shall be provided for at least three vehicles; and 8. No parking or storage is provided for more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. C. Urban Farming. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 107 Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 2/2 1. "Urban farming" is defined as the display or sale of edible farm products or fresh produce grown on -site. 2. A home occupation for urban farming not meeting the criteria of subsection (A) of this section is a permitted secondary use in all residential zones if it meets all of the criteria contained in subsection (B) of this section, except that: a. Subsection (B)(5) of this section does not apply. An applicant for a home occupation for the sale of on -site farm products or produce shall be required to submit a written statement indicating compliance with the applicable criteria of subsection (B) of this section accompanied by a site plan showing how any visitors to the site can be accommodated without creating a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties. b. The general prohibition of the display of goods and requiring the business to be wholly enclosed within a building in subsection (13)(2) of this section do not apply to the display or sale of edible farm products or produce, so long as the display is removed during nonoperating hours. D. Artist Studio. 1. An "artist studio' is defined as the display or sale of hand -made products (artwork) that are produced on site. Items or artwork created off site are not included in this definition. 2. A home occupation for an artist studio not meeting the criteria of subsection (A) of this section may be permitted as a Type II decision if it meets all of the criteria contained in subsection (B) of this section, except that: a. Subsection (13)(5) of this section does not apply. An applicant for a home occupation for an artist studio shall be required to submit a site plan showing how any visitors to the site can be accommodated without creating a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties. b. The display or sale of hand -made artwork shall remain completely enclosed within a building pursuant to subsection (A)(2) of this section. [Ord. 3889 § 1 (Att. A), 2012; Ord. 3840 § 1, 2011]. E. Business license required. All permitted home occupations approved under any provision of ECDC 20.20.010 A. through D. must also obtain and maintain a City of Edmonds business license, as provided for in Chapter 4.72 ECC, prior to engaging in the permitted business activity at the designated residential location. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4154, passed July 2, 2019. Packet Pg. 108 7.3.d Citation Comments Corrected the reference to 'Department of Motor Vehicles' [sic] to read: 'Department of Licensing', 4.11.010 A. which is the name of the state agency that regulates and licenses motor vehicle wreckers. (it may also be of note that the wrecker license is administerd through BLS on behalf of DOL). Added wording that the state motor vehicle wrecker license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.11.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the peddler, solicitor, street vendor license(s) required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.12.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions' Added a new subsection D. to this section with wording that the game licenses required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.24.010 D. NEW See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the Public Amusements license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.32.020 A. See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions' Added wording that the Public Dances license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.40.020 A. See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the Teen Dance Hall license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.44.020 A. See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions' Added wording that the Cabaret Dances license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.48.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' a Packet Pg. 109 7.3.d Citation Comments Added wording that the Massage, Bathhouse, etc. license(s) required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.50.030 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that an individual performing massage, etc. services in the capacity of an independant contractor may also need to hold the general business license. 4.50.080 C. NEW See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted below + General comment related to these revisions' Added wording that the Adult Entertainment license(s) required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.52.060 A. See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the Sound Truck license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.56.010 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions` Added wording that the Taxi license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. (It may be of note that the For Hire and Limousine licensing regulated by Dept. of Licensing is also administered through BLS.) 4.60.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.010 B., noted below + General comment related to these revisions`'' Corrected the word "or" [sic] to read: "of' so that the phrase exempting employees from the term 4.72.010 A. person' reads: '...but shall not include employees of persons licensed pursuent to this chapter.' 4.72.010 C., D., & E. Due to the addition of the definition of "Engaging in Business' being added to this section as subsection Renumbered "C.", renumbered the subsequent subsections to become subsections "D.", "E.", and "F." 4.72.010 G. NEW Added a definition for BLS Embedded a comment stating the assumption the section refers to the condition of two business 4.72.020 owners operating their respective businesses at the same physical location, as opposed to a single business owner conducting multiple business activities at the same physical location under the one business ownership. m d CO d O 0 J N N m c m a� r N t 3 c a O 4r m r F- LU aI C =a c d E c� m v c cc c :a O CD 0 N X O c c O .y O m O U O E W r c m E t tv a Packet Pg. 110 7.3.d Citation Comments Embedded a comment onto this subsection, copied in full here: This subsection was transferred from its previous location in 4.72.010 B., where the original intent was to remove them from the definition of "Business". In this new location, in the new section added to adopt the nonresident business exemption threshold, the implication is that there is actually some type of exemption for these chapters/business types from the business license requirement(s) of chapter 4.72. The preamble to the new section 4.72.021 indicates the exemption provided by the section could be either from the registration/license AND/OR just the license fee. HOWEVER, the preamble for subsection 4.72.021 B. does NOT specify what the actual exemption is (whether fully from licensing, or just the license fee). The recommendation is to actually just delete this subsection in its entirety, with the implication that the businesses currently listed would be required to hold both a business license - when conditions match those of chapter 4.72 - as well as the respective, additional regulatory 'licensing' required by each of the other respective chapters indicated. This approach is supported by other suggested revisions in each of the other chapters of Title 4 also stating this requirement.* 4.72.021 B. If, however, that provision is not acceptable, it is recommended that this subsection in the new exemptions section of 4.72 be stated as a full exemption from any chapter 4.72 business license requirements, rather than just a 'fee exemption' (due to the complications of administering another general, albeit 'zero -fee' license type). This second option would then also necessitate removing the suggested amendments of the other chapters of Title 4, that had provided for allowing a duel business license requirement in addition to the respective regulatory license. NOTE ALSO, two of the chapter citations in this subsection are incorrect and have been corrected. *This is an attempt to make the general business license more 'generally' required for business, and allowing for the city to add other, specific regulatory licensing on cetain business types. Wording was added to the respective chapters to refer to those license being in addition to the general license, but stated that in permissive language to allow the city discretion in that regard. It was also noted that there are 4 additional chapters in Title 4 with license requirements that are not mentioned in this esemption subsection of chapter 4.72; and as an example, the citation to chapter 4.20 (Liquor Licenses) does not contain any city licensing requirements in the chapter, while chapter 4.26 (Marijuana Licenses) is similarly formulated but was not included in the citations in this subsection of chapter 4.72. Clarifies that nonprofit organizations with tax exempt status require a business license. 4.72.021 B. 4.72.030 A. Revised to accommodate the application process administered through BLS. 4.72.030 B. Deleted this subsection to accommodate the BLS application process. Renumbered this section to be subsection B. due to the suggested deletion of the current subsection B. 4.72.030 C. Renumbered as B. Additional revision reflecting the clerk or designee as the responsible party for administration of license applications being submitted to BLS and not directly to the city. Renumbered this to be subsection B.1 due to the suggested deletion of the current subsection B. 4.72.030 C. Renumbered as B.1 Additional revision reflecting the conditions under which an application fee may be refunded. 4.72.040 A Revised to accommodate the fees and renewal application process administered through BLS. Referring to the annual fee amount for the city license (as opposed to the 'annual license'), allowing 4.72.040 B BLS' proration. a Packet Pg. 111 7.3.d Citation Comments 4.72.040 B. 3. Clarified that the 'other" business licenses refer to businesses operated in locations outside the city limits. 4.72.040 B. 5. NEW Clarifies that a nonprofit business license application is exempt from a license fee provided that the business provides proof of tax exempt status. 4.72.040 B. 6. NEW Add a new subsection introducing the allowance for the BLS proration of the license term and respective fee. Revised the section to accommodate the renewal process adminsitered by BLS, and the BLS late penalty. 4.72.040 C. Inserted the usual provision of license cancellation if the renewal is not completed within 120 days after expiration. Added wording that the Panwbroker / Secondhand license(s) required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.75.010 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted above + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the Horse Taxi license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.85.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted above + General comment related to these revisions`'' Added wording that the Public Market license required to conduct that business in the city is in addition to the city business license. 4.90.020 See Also: + Revisions and comments for 4.72.020, noted above + General comment related to these revisions' 20.20.010 E NEW New subsection stating a requirement that Home Occupation businesses must hold a business license issued under chapter 4.72. a Packet Pg. 112 7.3.d Citation Comments * General Comment: It is suggested as a policy change, to make the general business license apply to most all businesses, with few exceptions, and present the other specialized licensing requirements as being in addition to the general license, to further regulate that specific activity. This modification accomodates the automated BLS process for assigning a city license to an applicant, pending review by the city. The BLS system will normally assign the city license when the applicant indicates a physical location inside city limits. This essentially occurs regardless whether the city has specifically exempted a certain type of business activity from the general license. Consequently, in any case, it would then be the responsibility of the city to review an application as to whether to require the general license as well as a specific regulatory license, or if the city wishes to require only one or the other type license and make the appropriate adjustments to the application submitted. Wording has been suggested in the various chapters that have a specific license required to indicate that that license is in addition to the general business license in chapter 4.72. However, in each instance, the wording is made to be permissive, allowing the city to make the determination of what license is required in a particular instance. If the city chooses to retain the current language exempting the several other licenses from also needing the general license, the city should be aware of the description of the automated process described above which will still add a general license to an applicant located inside city limits. Packet Pg. 113 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Confirmation of Appointment of Nikki Okimoto Glaros to Diversity Commission Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The nine Edmonds Diversity Commission members were originally appointed on October 27, 2015 for staggered 1-, 2- and 3-year terms. As of 1/1/20 Position 3 will become available for a full three-year term that runs until December 31, 2022. The position opening was advertised via local media, and previous applicants were also notified. Five applications were received. All five applicants were interviewed by the Commission at its regular meeting of November 6, 2019. Pursuant to ECC 10.65.020(B), new appointments to the Diversity Commission shall be made by the seated Commissioners, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Staff Recommendation Approve Consent Agenda item confirming appointment of Nikki Okimoto Glaros to the Diversity Commission for a term scheduled to expire 12/31/22. Narrative Of the five applicants interviewed by the Diversity Commissioners on 11/6/19, the Commission voted to appoint Nikki Okimoto Glaros to Position 3 for a term scheduled to expire 12/31/22. (Her application is attached here.) At a Special Meeting on 12/3/19 Councilmembers interviewed Ms. Okimoto Glaros for consideration of confirmation of her appointment and forwarded confirmation of her appointment to the 12/3/19 Regular Council meeting Consent Agenda. Attachments: Glaros Nikki Okimoto Packet Pg. 114 7.4.a Citizen Board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) NOTE: This form is opublir meord and maybe sublert to disclosure upon mquest Diversity Commission (Board or Commission) Name: Nikki akimoto Glarus Address: Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: 10127/19 Day Phone• Evert Phone Cell: E-mail Occupational status and background: Currently self-employed in social media marketing. Most recent local employment was with Hunniwater/Hunni Co. in Edmonds in social media marketing and event planning. Organizational affiliations: Pacific Little League VP of Softball, 2015-present; Founder and Adm in, Edmonds Indivisible 2016-present; Madrona Children's Theater board member 2016-present, current show producer-, Madrona Integrated Team board 2011-present, Giving Tree coordinator 2013-17 Why are you seeking this appointment? Edmonds is at a crossroads - changes in demographics here are causing conflicts to escalate. The work of the Diversity Commission is more important than ever to educate and promote understanding of the importance of diversity and representation in our town. What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? Multiracial background, raising two kids in ES❑ schools, networking, event planning, love of Edmondsl Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds:, none Additional comments: Thank you for this opportunity! Please return this campleted form to: Edmonds City Hall 1215'hAvenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 carolvn.iafave0edmandswa.Rov Stgnctur Phone: 425.771.0247 I Fax: 425.771.0252 Rev7sed 4130114 Packet Pg. 115 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Confirmation of Appointment of Sekou Kone to Diversity Commission Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The nine Edmonds Diversity Commission members were originally appointed on October 27, 2015 for staggered 1-, 2- and 3-year terms. As of 1/1/20 Position 1 will become available for a full three-year term that runs until December 31, 2022. The position opening was advertised via local media, and previous applicants were also notified. Five applications were received. All five applicants were interviewed by the Commission at its regular meeting of November 6, 2019. Pursuant to ECC 10.65.020(B), new appointments to the Diversity Commission shall be made by the seated Commissioners, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Staff Recommendation Approve Consent Agenda item confirming appointment of Sekou Kone to the Diversity Commission for a term scheduled to expire 12/31/22. Narrative Of the five applicants interviewed by the Diversity Commissioners on 11/6/19, the Commission voted to appoint Sekou Kone to Position 1 for a term scheduled to expire 12/31/22. (His application is attached here.) At a Special Meeting on 12/3/19 the City Council interviewed Mr. Kone and forwarded confirmation of his appointment to the 12/3/19 Regular Council meeting Consent Agenda. Attachments: Kone Sekou Packet Pg. 116 I 7.5.a I Edmonds Citizen Board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) NOTE: This form is a public record and may be subject to disclosure upon request Diversity Commission (Board or Commission) Name:Sekou Kane Address Edmonds, WA 98026 Date:10/14/19 Day Phone: Evening Phone: Cell: E-mail: ' c . 1 01' Occupational status and background; Licensed Practical Nurso at Manorcaire Alderwcod. Immigrant from Cote d9voire in West Afica. English, French, and Mandingo speaker. Raised Muslim. Wife and three sons have lived in Edmonds since 2001. Marathon runner, and good neighbor. Organizational affiliations; Part-time VP of International Affairs at Kone Consulting LLC helping to plan a service trip to Cote d1voire in December 2019. Why are you seeking this appointment? I would like to serve my community I am interested in City politics. am concerned about Edmonds' reputation as a community that is not diverse I want everyone who visits and chooses to live here to feel respected and welcomed, What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? Organ izational and computer skills.andplenty of ideas. Most important is my point of view as an immigrant and black man living in Edmonds. Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds:. None Additional comments; I look forward to learning more about how I can contribute to celebrating diversity in Edmonds. Please return this completed farm to: Edmonds City Hall 121 5'�' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 carolvn.lafave@ed mondswa.R Phone:425.771.0247 1 Fax:425.771.0257 Signature Revised 4130114 c 0 M u 0 0 U) 0 Y r E Q Packet Pg. 117 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Utility Rate Analysis, Public Hearing and future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On June 11, 2019, staff presented the Utility Rate Analysis and future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance to the PPW committee. On July 16, 2019, staff presented the Utility Rate Analysis and future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance to the Finance committee. On September 10, 2019, staff presented the Utility Rate Analysis and future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance to the PPW committee. On November 19, 2019, staff presented the Utility Rates Proposal to full Council. Staff Recommendation Prepare a Utility Rate Ordinance for approval at the December 10th City Council meeting. Narrative The City of Edmonds operates a combined utility operation which incorporates potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm and surface water management functions. The City received the draft combined utility rate study from its consultant, the FCS Group. The study identifies increases in water, sewer, and stormwater utility cost structures. It also projects these costs forward and makes recommendations on adjusting utility rates. The recommended adjustments will help address rising costs including but not limited to: inflation in maintenance and operations costs, wholesale cost increases for potable water from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District, and replacement of aging and failing water/sewer/storm infrastructure as part of the annual replacement projects and upcoming larger capital projects. The rate analysis had a focus on the sewer fund since there are at least three future large capital projects that need to be addressed over the next decade. The analysis of the Sewer Fund (Fund 423) reviewed various alternatives including: cash funding, one time borrowing for one large project, borrowing for the three future large projects, and borrowing near term to keep rate increases low for the near term. The rate increases recommended and proposed by staff are for the next three years in keeping with the approach the City has used since 2011. It recommends bonding during the coming 2020 for Packet Pg. 118 8.1 approximately $10M to provide the City's share of the Pyrolysis Project. The cost for annual maintenance and replacement projects will continue to be rate funded. Packet Pg. 119 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 2020 Legislative Agenda Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The attached Final Draft of the 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda has been compiled over the last couple of months with direct input from our outgoing Olympia lobbyist, Jennifer Ziegler, our incoming Olympia lobbyist, Debora Munguia, Directors of every City Department, Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers, including Councilmembers-elect, who met in small groups with Mayor Earling, the lobbyists and Patrick Doherty, or communicated independently with staff, to share their suggestions about agenda items. The agenda was also informed by the legislative agendas of AWC, the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County, Snohomish County Health District, WRIAB, WRPA, and Snohomish County Cities. Staff Recommendation Approve the 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda. Narrative The attached Final Draft of the 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda contains all the proposed additions and/or edits offered by City Councilmembers in the small group meetings or independently. Attachments: DRAFT 2020 legislative agenda Packet Pg. 120 9.1.a '47C. 189%J DRAFT CITY OF EDMONDS 2020 STATE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA EDMONDS PRIORITIES Highway 99 Corridor Improvements The Legislature appropriated $10 million in the 2021-2023 biennium from the Connecting Washington program for much -needed transportation and safety improvements in the Highway 99 Corridor as continuing implementation of our adopted Highway 99 Corridor Subarea Plan. We appreciate that the Legislature advanced $1 million of the $10 million to the 2017-2019 biennium to conduct concept design of initial improvements, on which the City has made great progress, readying component projects of our plan for implementation. For these reasons, we seek additional funding to implement these important safety improvements. An ideal source of continuing funding would be reappropriation of the $6.2 million originally appropriated by the Legislature in the 2019-2021 for design and construction of the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector since this project has been discontinued due to lack of community support. To continue our initial progress and move forward to final design and construction of initial improvements for SR 99, we request that the Legislature shift the $6.2 million originally appropriated for the former Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector project to the SR 99 project in the 2019-2021 biennium. Packet Pg. 121 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 2 of 8 Pyrolysis Project at Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant The Carbon Recovery Project will replace an aging sanitary sewage incinerator at the City's Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) with a belt dryer and new pyrolysis technology. Pyrolysis is thermal conversion of organic matter in the absence of oxygen. This will convert 50% or more of the organic matter in biosolids to elemental carbon ("biochar") rather than emitting it as CO2, the most prolific of greenhouse gases. This will reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 1,150 tons/yr. The total project cost is estimated at over $20,000,000, approximately the same as the cost of traditional incineration, yet with lower life -cycle costs and greater environmental benefits. Edmonds will shoulder approximately half the cost, while our partners, Mountlake Terrace, the Ronald Wastewater District (Shoreline), and the Olympic View Water and Wastewater District, Q will finance the rest. a, The City is seeking $500,000 from the State capital budget in 2020 to assist the City in defraying N the cost of implementing this innovative, environmentally superior technology. We would be the first municipal WWTP in the US to use this technology for full-scale biosolids treatment. We J N believe the State has a legitimate interest in having this option fully proven for use by other CD plants in Washington. We are hopeful we can also receive support at the federal level and will be pursuing that option as well. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Proiect (including Daylighting of Willow Creek and Redevelopment of Marina Beach Park) The restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is critical for salmon recovery. As a fully functioning saltwater marsh, it will once again serve as a rearing habitat for juvenile salmon, helping ensure their survival. Increasing salmon survival will help increase the supply of salmon in Puget Sound for the endangered resident orca. The City has set aside $1.3 million to date, with a 2020 budget proposal of an additional $750,000 for this project. In addition, the City will add another $30,000 of local funding to begin the preliminary design for the redevelopment of Marina Beach Park after Willow Creek has been daylighted through the existing Park footprint. The City has also recently received a $450,000 grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. That is a total of $2.5 million available to match future State, Federal, and Foundation grants for the project. We must also secure a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Washington State Department of Transportation that recognizes future use of part of the former UNOCAL site south of the Marsh to accommodate a portion of the daylighted Willow Creek. This MOU is a prerequisite to receiving important additional grant funding anticipated for design and permitting work as well as subsequent construction. We are also seeking legislative support and possible assistance in securing this MOU from the State. Packet Pg. 122 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 3 of 8 The City of Edmonds urges the Governor and the State Legislature seek support and assistance for the Edmonds Marsh Estuary project in the 2020 Legislative Session and to adopt a 2020- 2022 Capital Budget that includes full funding of the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board (RCFB), which will allow the City to seek a funding request of $1.5 million for Marina Beach Park development in conjunction with the daylighting of Willow Creek and restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. Creative Districts Funding and Support As Washington's first Creative District, it is very important to Edmonds that support and resources be both available and enhanced at the State level for Creative Districts around the State, including Edmonds. We support requests on the part of the Washington State Arts c Commission for projects and grants funding, as well as increased administrative and programmatic funding, to assist in furthering the work plans and capital projects of certified Creative Districts and the onboarding of new Creative Districts. In addition, support legislation and/or rules changes that could establish incentives to further Creative District capital projects, affordable housing or studio/maker space for creatives, location of creative -sector businesses, _J etc. N 0 N Support Edmonds Waterfront Center (former Senior Center) Funding The City of Edmonds will support efforts by the Edmonds Waterfront Center to secure funding for the redevelopment of their important community facility on the Edmonds Waterfront, in particular to assist with efforts to construct to LEED Gold -certified standards. Initiative 976 response The passage of 1-976 has significant consequences for the City of Edmonds. Repeal of the Transportation Benefit District authority results in the loss of $700,000 annually that the City uses to maintain our streets and roads, as well as the loss of significant amounts of potential state funding. In fact, this fund has also yielded over $6.6 million over the past 5 years to the City of Edmonds. We encourage the Legislature to evaluate additional sources of local and state transportation funding to mitigate the impacts of the passage of Initiative 976. Packet Pg. 123 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 4 of 8 SUPPORT ITEMS Invest in Housing Stability and Affordability Especially in recognition of Edmonds' renewed focus on this topic, bolstered by the establishment of a Housing Commission, we wish to support state resources to address affordable housing, housing stability, homelessness, and associated services, including: • Fund the Housing Trust Fund. -Provide at least an additional $10 million for the Housing Trust Fund for the preservation of affordable homes. • Allow for extended application of the Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) program for continued affordability guarantees, as well as consider amendments to apply MFTE to affordable artist/maker housing in certified Creative Districts. • Encourage the legislature to support voluntary adoption of more effective Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinances as one of several options to increase housing supply. Fire Alarm Testing Seek amendment of WAC 51-50-097. This rule was modified by Legislative action in 2018 to stipulate that required annual fire alarm testing can only be performed by NICET II -certified technicians. This, in effect, disqualifies licensed City electricians from being able to conduct these tests unless they are, or have in the past, worked full-time in the fire alarm industry. This rule needs to be amended to allow organizations, such as municipalities, that have employees with State electrical 01 or 07 licenses to be able to conduct fire alarm testing and fire alarm maintenance in buildings owned by their employer, thereby saving local taxpayers money as this requirement currently costs a city like Edmonds approximately $60,000 annually. Bolster Resources for Infrastructure Investment Support efforts to establish dedicated funding mechanisms for critical public works (vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian transportation, utilities, stormwater, parks, etc.) infrastructure programs that help cities grow and prosper. In particular, we support the following AWC priorities: • Adopt a comprehensive transportation package that provides new resources and options for municipal transportation investment; • Authorize new ways to leverage public and private funding for major projects. • Fully fund the Public Works Trust Fund • Continue investment in the Public Works Assistance Account (PWAA), the Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB), and the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) c as a� a a� M as J O N 0 N Packet Pg. 124 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 5 of 8 Local Public Health Funding & Programming Local health jurisdictions provide invaluable services to local communities around the State, yet lack a secure funding mechanism. Edmonds supports increased funding to fully implement HB 1497 (2019) setting up Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS). Edmonds also supports efforts promoted by the Snohomish Health District to: • Fund preservation of Title X family planning programming. • Fund focused on prevention, treatment and recovery related to opioid abuse. • Ban sale of flavored vapor products, increased public education, oversight and research. • Develop, implement and fund adult mortality review and prevention, especially focused on overdose and suicide deaths. • Create residential sharps disposal stewardship program. c • Add suicide as a notifiable condition to WAC 246-101. • Provide protections for quarantine- or isolation -impacted individuals or caregivers. • Reverse continuing reductions in marijuana tax revenues accruing to local Health M Districts and promote a more equitable allocation of marijuana tax revenues to local _J public health districts, counties and cities for prevention and education efforts. N N Public Defense Costs Continue to support efforts to provide a state revenue stream for additional city public defense costs as a result of the State Supreme Court's mandated caseload rule for public defenders. Gun Violence Reduction Support efforts for legislation addressing the reduction of gun violence, especially related to semiautomatic weapons and use of high -capacity magazines. Fiscal Impacts of Legislation and Rulemaking Follow the lead of AWC and municipalities in sending a clear message to the Legislature to consider the fiscal impacts of legislation and rulemaking on local municipalities, including a check on "unfunded mandates" and "do no harm" analysis of proposed new rules or legislation Likewise, fiscal notes accompanying legislation should include both the financial costs and benefits (currently only costs are analyzed). Land Use Law Review (Growth Management Act. SEPA. annexation laws. et. al. In 2019, the "Road Map to Washington's Future" report was provided to the Legislature. It identifies opportunities at a high level for improving/consolidating/streamlining the myriad of state land use laws, including GMA, SEPA, annexation, water rights, and others. We need to follow closely and participate in discussions related to the Road Map report and to other potential legislation related to land use or environmental issues, especially to safeguard our Packet Pg. 125 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 6 of 8 interests of encouraging appropriate development in urbanized areas and along transit corridors, while protecting agricultural, rural and open space lands. We support efforts by the Legislature to exempt residential projects within cities from administrative or judicial appeals under SEPA and the GMA to help increase residential building capacity. Economic Development Tools Support efforts and proposals from Economic Alliance of Snohomish County, AWC, and other State economic development agencies to broaden the array of tools and incentives available to encourage and support sustainable economic development and investment, particularly in under -developed urban areas, to provide jobs, housing and meet GMA goals for sustainable development. Q • We support AWC's proposal to create a tax increment financing (TIF) facsimile option a� for cities. M • We support continued investment in the Department of Commerce's economic _J development functions, especially focused on international trade and sector -lead N programs. N Fiscal Sustainabilitv for Local Governments Continue to support efforts to ensure sufficient, stable and flexible revenue for essential city services, including equitable distribution from shared revenue sources, such as liquor and marijuana taxes, as well as tying property tax revenue growth to inflation and population to allow municipalities the local option of continuing to provide core governmental services. Environmental and Climate -Related Issues Monitor and potential support potential environmental -protection measures, including those that would enhance the Puget Sound ecosystem, including the impacts of coal and oil trains, drought management, toxics control and clean-up, as well as measures associated with climate change, crumb rubber athletic field infill, remediation of culverts under state highways, banning plastic bags, etc. Puget Sound Health and Salmon/Orca Recovery Support WRIA 8, together with other organizations and municipalities in pursuing the following measures and funding from the Legislature: Budget Priorities: • Identify and support specific funding requests for priority projects identified in and/or consistent with the WRIA 8 salmon recovery strategies. Packet Pg. 126 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 7 of 8 • Support state agency budget requests for monitoring salmon populations and for studies and management of predation, disease, and other issues that affect WRIA 8 salmon populations. Legislative Priorities: • Support legislation that seeks to provide immunity from liability for entities that implement habitat restoration projects involving the placement of large wood. • Support legislation that seeks to improve regulatory protections for areas that are important for salmon habitat, and oppose legislation that reduces regulatory protections for these areas. • Participate in continued efforts to explore watershed -based and/or regional funding authorities to support multiple -benefit projects that address salmon habitat protection and restoration, water quality, stormwater management, and flood management. Q M Parks, Recreation and Conservation N as J Support Washington Recreation & Park Association's (WRPA) legislative priorities to include: N CD • Protect funding for dedicated accounts within the Capital Budget urging lawmakers to keep top -of -mind that the outdoor recreation sector generates nearly $22 billion a year in economic activity for the state, as well as 200,000+ jobs. • Provide local parks and recreation agencies with new funding options to address vital M&O and preservation needs and to enhance economic development N • Support $50,000 allocation to update outdoor recreation sector economic analysis • Support legislation to ban sales/transport of English and Atlantic Ivy, and other CD invasives, in our State 0 N • Support "Big Tent" Outdoor Recreation Coalition and benefits of outdoor recreation Q • Advocate for key "Healthy & Active Communities" funding within the State budget o process: o Public Health District and "Healthiest Next Generation" funding — Operating Budget o Bicycle and Pedestrian Grant, Safe Routes to Schools, and "Complete Streets" funding —Transportation Budget o Dedicated accounts and grant programs such as Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition (WWRP), Youth Athletics Facilities (YAF), Aquatics Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA), Non -Highway Off -Road Vehicle Account (NOVA), and Boating Facilities Program (BFP) — Capital Budget • Support Increased Funding Associated with the "No Child Left Inside" Grant Program • Support Increase in the Annual Discover Pass Fee from $30 to $35 Packet Pg. 127 9.1.a 2020 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 8 of 8 Follow/Support Other Cities', Agencies', Partners' Agendas Monitor and provide support to our partner cities, agencies and other entities in their top agenda items, where they align with our interests. c as a J O N O N Packet Pg. 128 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Proposed Capital Facilities Plan and 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program Staff Lead Department Preparer: Rob English Engineering Rob English Background/History On November 4, 2019, staff presented the 2020 department budgets which included capital decision packages proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan/2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program. On November 12, 2019, a public hearing was held for the Capital Facilities Plan/2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program. On November 26, 2019, Council continued discussion on the proposed Capital Facilities Plan and 2020- 2025 Capital Improvement Program. Staff Recommendation 1. Approve the Ordinance to adopt the 2019 amendments to the City Comprehensive Plan (including the Capital Facilities Plan) at the City Council meeting on December 3, 2019. 2. Approve the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program with the adoption of the 2020 Budget. Narrative The attached Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) have been updated to reflect several changes proposed by Councilmember Buckshnis (Refer to Exhibit 6). The proposed 2020 funding of $775,000 (DP 80/81) from the stormwater fund (422) was not changed. This would be a discussion item at the December 3rd meeting. Councilmember Johnson requested a breakdown of REET funding being spent on Parks and Public Works in 2020. The 2020 REET funding allocations are: Fund 125 Parks $2,636,924 Public Works $ 425,692 Fund 126 Parks $1,414,113 Public Works $1,078,527 Packet Pg. 129 9.2 BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Facilities Plan Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects are identified within the six -year capital improvement program along with capital facility plan projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. CIP vs. CFP The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. The proposed CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2020-2025 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's financial fund numbers. Exhibit 3 is a comparison that shows added, deleted and changed projects between last year's CFP/CIP to the proposed CFP/CIP. The CFP and CIP were presented to the Planning Board on October 9th and a public hearing was held on October 23rd. The Planning Board recommended the CFP and CIP be forwarded to the City Council for approval. The minutes from the Planning Board meetings are attached as Exhibits 4 and 5. Attachments: Exhibit 3 - CIP-CFP Comparison Exhibit 4 - PB October 9th Minutes Exhibit 5 - PB October 23rd Minutes Exhibit 6 - Buckshnis 112619 email Exhibit 2 - CIP DRAFT Exhibit 1 - CFP DRAFT Packet Pg. 130 9.2.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2019 TO 2020) ADDED PROJECTS FUND PROJECT NAME I UP I DESCRIPTION Building I Public Safety Ground Fence I linstall new security fence around the parking lot at the public safety building. 112 Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Install walkway on south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S (funded X by TIB Complete Street grant) 112 SR-104 Walkway from HAWK signal to Pine St / Pine St. from SR-104 to 3rd Install walkway along SR-104 from HAWK signal to Pine St. and along Pine St. Ave. S X from SR-104 to 3rd Ave. S 112 Citywide Bicycle Improvements X Add bike lanes and sharrows along various stretches throughout the City. 112 Downtown Lighting Improvements Installation of new light poles at various locations throughout Downtown to X improve night-time safety for all modes of transportation. 126 Civic Park design x Ongoing, anticipated completion in 2020/2021 126 Waterfront Redevelopment/Ebb tide walkway design x lOngoing, anticipated completion in 2019/2020 421 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program (2026) jEstimated future costs for waterline replacements. 421 Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements I jPeclestrian enhancements at various locations in the City 421 2020 Waterline Overlays jEstimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. 422 Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2026) jEstimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements 422 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 x Enlargement of infiltration facility to decrease peak flows into Perrinville Creek 423 Phase 13 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements (2026) Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr. 423 Lake Ballinger Sewer Estimated future costs for sewer project. Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 131 9.2.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2019 TO 2020) DELETED PROJECTS FUND PROJECT NAME I CFP I DESCRIPTION 112 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Completed in 2019 112 SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW Intersection Improvements X I Completed in 2019 ITo 112 2nd Ave. S Walkway from James St. to Main St. X be installed as part of up -coming development 112 238th St SW. Island and ADA Curb Ramps I lCompleted in 2019 112 Pavement Rating Study I lIncluded within Annual Street Preservation Program 125 Audible Pedestrian Signals Completed in 2019 125 Anderson Center playground Completed 125 Civic Stadium removal Completed 125 Veterans Plaza Completed 125 City Park Storage JAnticipate completion 126 Trackside Warning System Completed in 2019. 126 220th St. SW Signal Coordination Completed in 2019 126 238th St SW. Island and ADA Curb Ramps Completed in 2019 126 Admiral Way Anticipate completion 126 89th PI Retaining Wall Replacement lCompleted in 2019 421 2016 Water System Plan Update Completed in 2018. 421 2018 Waterline Overlays Completed in 2018. 421 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements Completed in 2019. 421 Annual Replacement Program (Phase 8) 2017 Completed in 2019. 421 Annual Replacement Program (Phase 9) 2018 lCompleted in 2019. 422 Northstream Culvert Abandonement Completed 422 Seaview Infiltration Facility Phase 1 Completed 422 City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects Project completed at 71st & 174th; funding for out years revised into individual phased annual repalcement proejcts 422 76th Ave @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements (Storm) lCompleted in 2019 422 2018 Lorian Woods Study IStudy complete 423 Phase 4 Annual Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Impr (2016) lCompleted in 2018 423 Phase 6 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2018) 1 I lCompleted in 2019 423 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements lCompleted in 2019 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 132 9.2.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2019 TO 2020) CHANGED PROJECTS FUND PROJECT NAME I UP I CHANGE 422 1 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 1 12020 & 2021 values reduced to provide funding for Seaview Phase 2 Project split into Waterfront Redevelopment and Waterfront Walkway 125 Waterfront Redevelopment Completion Project split into Waterfront Redevelopment and Waterfront Walkway 126 Waterfront Redevelopment Completion Project split into Waterfront Redevelopment and Waterfront Walkway 332 Waterfront Redevelopment Completion Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 133 9.2.b CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Meeting October 9, 2019 Chair Cheung called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 51 Avenue North. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Matthew Cheung, Chair Daniel Robles, Vice Chair Todd Cloutier Alicia Crank Nathan Monroe Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig (left at 8:00) Mike Rosen Conner Bryan, Student Representative BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Roger Pence (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Joe Herr, Chair Maureen Jeude Bruce Owensby Cary Guenther ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Laurie Strauss, Vice Chair Kim Bayer Tom Walker STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Rob English, City Engineer Shannon Burley, Deputy Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER MONROE MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER ROSEN SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no audience comments. Packet Pg. 134 9.2.b DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD There were no comments related to the Development Services Director Report JOINT MEETING WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD (ADB): DESIGN REVIEW ROLES AND PROCESS Mr. Clugston reviewed that the Planning Board and ADB discussed revisions to the ADB's roles and involvement in project reviews at a joint meeting on July 24', and the Planning Board discussed revisions to the ADB's roles and processes at a joint meeting with the City Council on September 241. The purpose of this meeting is to have continued discussion about the ADB's changing roles in developing the guidance and standards necessary to influence design in Edmonds and its specific role in the project design review process. It is anticipated that, at the end of the discussion, the two groups will provide direction to staff to draft code revisions to implement the changes. Mr. Clugston reviewed that the ADB is concerned that the design standards are incomplete and do not always yield the results that the ADB and the Edmonds community want to see. The ADB feels it spends too much time approving already - designed projects without being able to influence design decisions early in the development process. They have expressed a desire to have an earlier role in the review process, as well as a role in reviewing and developing design standards. He referred to Attachment 1, which provides a summary of the ADB's current codified powers and duties compared with the ADB's desired roles and a list of recommendations from the ADB. He also referred to Attachment 2, which is a flowchart of the proposed new design review process. He reviewed the ADB's recommendations are as follows: 1. Mandatory pre -application meetings with prospective applicants, before designs are completed and applications submitted. For the past 30 years, the ADB's work has focused on making quasi-judicial decisions at the end of a project review, and this has caused it to miss opportunities to participate in recent design work related to Westgate, Highway 99, Five Corners, etc. As was discussed at the last joint meeting, quasi-judicial decision making at the end of a project review cycle is not the best use of the ADB's time and expertise. In addition, the City Council, via Resolution 1367, has stated its intent to remove volunteer boards from the quasi-judicial decision - making role. As envisioned, the ADB would have two touches of larger projects during the design review cycle. The first would be at the pre -application phase when an applicant is still in the early stages of project development, and the second would be during the application review as a recommendation to the final decision maker. A mandatory pre -application meeting would allow the ADB to provide guidance on a variety of elements, including massing, site context and open space, before an applicant spends significant time and money preparing design plans. The second review would allow the Board to take a second look at a project to see if the applicant addressed the Board's design vision from the pre -application meeting and propose design conditions if it did not. 2. Periodic reviews of completed projects, comparing approved designs to completed projects. Post -hoc reviews of completed projects would allow the ADB to see how projects age into sites and whether what was envisioned by the design standards and guidelines are working or if they need to be revised to ensure the community is getting the design it wants. 3. Review City codes and policies related to design, making recommendations to the City Council on adjustments or, when appropriate, new standards or design guidance. The ADB would like to have a role in developing and recommending citywide design guidelines and standards, as well as context -sensitive standards for special design districts such as Highway 99, Five Corners, Westgate, etc. Board Member Owensby said the ADB hasn't had a lot of opportunity to discuss how the proposed recommendations would be implemented, but they all feel frustration with the current process and their inability to provide input relative to design. In some cases, the ADB has approved projects it normally wouldn't have simply because they meet all of the City's design standards and they had no choice. He said the ADB would like to play a larger role in developing policies and codes that affect design. There are currently a lot of design standards that appear to be requirements, when in fact, they are just guidelines and the ADB doesn't have the ability to enforce them. It would be good to have guidelines in place that are both consistent and enforceable. He suggested that, rather than one -size -fits -all design standards, the standards should recognize Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 135 9.2.b that the setbacks, building modulation and other design standards need to based on the type of building, as well as its use and location. Chair Herr recalled that, just recently, an applicant presented a project that the ADB really liked but could not approve as presented. While the intent of the design standards is good, it wasn't possible to meet them without making significant structural engineering changes. The Board's hands were tied because it has no discretionary ability to modify the standards. If the ADB had been involved early in the design, perhaps it could have recommended some potential solutions. In the end, the applicant came back with a project that met all of the Board's recommendations, but a lot of time and money was required to get to that point. They could have got out in front of these issues if they had had an opportunity to meet with the applicant early in the design process. He summarized that the Board can recommend changes as part of its quasi-judicial review, but it has no authority to stop a project that meets all of the design guidelines and code standards. The fact that this developer took the ADB's recommendations to heart and redesigned the building was a bonus, but he didn't have to do it. Chair Herr explained that, with the current process, applicant's present projects and the Board reviews the Design Guideline Checklist and signs off on them without having an opportunity to provide significant input. They can make recommendations, but there are no teeth to require applicants to implement changes. If the ADB doesn't like a project, they have to approve it anyway if it meets all of the design guidelines and codes. The ADB would like to be involved earlier in design review to help guide projects. Board Member Guenther pointed out that the ADB has never been invited to provide input on design elements when the Comprehensive Plan is updated. He expressed his belief that the ADB needs to be more involved in both Comprehensive Plan policies and legislative code amendments related to design. Besides just approving projects, the ADB can offer a lot more. Board Member Rosen asked what the Planning Board's role will be in the process of changing the ADB's role and the design review process. Mr. Chave explained that, as per code, the Planning Board is responsible for making recommendations to the City Council regarding amendments to the Development Code, including ADB procedures and responsibilities, and that is why the ADB is meeting jointly with the Planning Board to share its recommendation. Mr. Chave said the ADB has discussed having all of the design standards in one section of the code, and then having the ADB the body in charge of making recommendations to the City Council regarding design code changes. He suggested it would be awkward for the ADB to have study sessions and public hearings on proposed amendments, only for the Planning Board to have to repeat the process before making a recommendation to the City Council. The ADB is interested in having a stronger role in the development of design guidelines (Comprehensive Plan) and design standards (Development Code), and staff believes it would make sense for the ADB to submit their recommendations directly to the City Council. In an attempt to advance the recommendations with the best opportunity for success, Board Member Rosen asked if it would be better to have the recommended changes come from the Planning Board or from both boards together. Mr. Chave suggested that it would be appropriate to present the proposed changes to the City Council in a joint meeting. Regarding Board Member Guenther's comment about the ADB being left out of the Comprehensive Plan process, Board Member Rubenkonig pointed out that there hasn't been a comprehensive review of the Comprehensive Plan for quite a while. The most recent amendments were unrelated to design. Board Member Guenther recalled that he was a member of the Planning Board when the design element of the Comprehensive Plan was updated, and the Planning Board did not solicit feedback or help from the ADB. He suggested that it would be appropriate for the ADB to participate the next time the design element is updated. Board Member Rubenkonig asked Mr. Chave to explain the City's process for reviewing the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Chave said the City completes a comprehensive update of its Comprehensive Plan every seven years. In between, the City conducts an annual update to address minor changes that are needed for one reason or another. He said the ADB has suggested it would like to take a larger role in modifications to and development of the design guidelines, some of which are in the Comprehensive Plan. They would also like a larger role in creating and modifying the design standards in the Development Code. He noted that their input has been largely left out of previous updates. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 136 9.2.b Board Member Monroe recalled that at the last joint meeting, the two boards talked about the need for a deviation process. He asked if the ADB had a chance to talk about the concept further. Board Member Owenby answered no. Mr. Chave explained that the proposal currently before the Board would modify the code to allow the ADB to be involved earlier in design review and to have a role in developing and modifying design guidelines, design standards and other code regulations related to design. If and when the current proposal is adopted by the City Council, the ADB can begin to discuss potential code amendments, including a provision that allows for deviations to the design standards. Vice Chair Robles recalled that at the joint meeting, he recognized that the ADB members are creative, technically -minded and safety conscious in taking care of details. At their joint meeting with the Council, the Planning Board expressed its belief that the ADB is being underutilized at this time. For example, it was pointed out that the ADB has some great ideas related to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) that could be beneficial to the Housing Commission. When the City Council made it clear that ADU's were under the purview of the Housing Commission, he pointed out that allowing the ADB to study the issue and recommend a set of specifications that can work for ADUs would help the Housing Commission move quicker. He said he can see how the ADB's work at the front end could actually lubricate the issue and allow it to run smoother rather than hold it back. He wholeheartedly agreed that having ADB participation closer to the front end of design review would be beneficial, as well. He asked what would be the best approach for pushing the ADB's recommended changes forward to the City Council. Chair Herr referred to Attachment 1, which outlines what the ADB is striving to accomplish. However, implementing all of the changes will take baby steps. The ADB's recommendation list only includes three items as a place to start. As the changes are implemented, the Board will get a better idea of how it can best serve and help applicants present their projects. If the ADB is allowed to comment earlier, their feedback will come more as a suggestion or recommendation. If they are presented at the end after a project has been fully designed, applicants are much less willing to consider the recommendations. Having the review come earlier in the process will benefit developers, the ADB, the City and the community. Vice Chair Robles stressed the need to clearly articulate the ADB's vision. If you flip the politics, it becomes an easy change. It is all about communicating the proposal to the City Council in a way that they are open to the rest of the changes. Mr. Chave referred to Attachment 1, which lists the ADB's current powers and duties, noting that most of what the ADB currently does (reviewing projects) isn't even on the list. Their major job now is to act as the approval body for projects rather than providing design expertise for the development of design in the City. The ADB is suggesting going back to the powers and duties that the current code assigns to them. They would still have a role in project review, but it would be pushed much earlier in the process to better influence how design develops. Having a provision in place that allows for design standard modifications would encourage good design to happen. He summarized that if the Planning Board supports the ADB's recommendations, staff could schedule a joint meeting with the ADB, Planning Board and City Council. If the Council is receptive to the recommendation, staff could draft the appropriate code changes to make it happen. Board Member Owensby agreed that the proposal's success will depend on how it is presented to the City Council. He doesn't want to step on anyone's toes. As an architect, he has to gather and assimilate a variety of information (building codes, soil conditions, client desires, etc.) in order to do a good project. The ADB members excel at doing this. With regards to ADUs, the ADB could help the Housing Commission think through the process creatively so that Edmonds gets the type of housing it needs. Vice Chair Robles agreed that the Housing Commission is necessary, and the ADB could support their efforts so they don't get bogged down with details that would be easy for the ADB to address. Mr. Chave explained that the Housing Commission's role will be to come up with policies relative to ADUs and not to develop detailed standards for ADU's. Once the policies are in place, they will allow the Planning Board and/or ADB to come up with specific implementation standards to implement the policies. The City Council didn't want the Planning Board and ADB to "get too far into the weeds" before the Housing Commission comes up with the big picture policy direction. Board Member Rubenkonig said she watched the video of the Planning Board's joint meeting with the City Council and observed that there was a misrepresentation of the ADU concept and that some Board Members confused the issue. She appreciates that Mr. Chave has set the Board straight. She said the way the Board could impact the ADU discussion was also Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 137 9.2.b misrepresented. It is her understanding that the Planning Board and ADB can look at the current criteria for detached ADUs and consider other criteria that would result in acceptable design for the City, and it is time for that to take place. There is no new policy being made at this time for detached ADU's, and it is not within their purview to discuss policy changes. However, the Planning Board can work with the ADB to see if there is another way for ADUs to look that might be more palatable for the neighborhoods and the City. The current regulations have been in place for a long time, and perhaps they no longer represent the present concerns or future needs. Discussing these regulations are well within the purview of the two Boards. She recalled previous discussions with the Development Services Director, indicating that the Planning Board could work with the ADB on the design issues related to ADU's. However, policies as to who can benefit from ADU's will come from the Housing Commission. That is what the City Council was trying to clarify. Board Member Rubenkonig concluded that, with this understanding and staff s support, the Planning Board can engage with the ADB in looking at the design standards for ADUs. However, they must be clear they can always do what they have been doing, which is making preferences known as to the benefit these structures could be for other people in the City aside from family members. The Planning Board is expected to represent different views and be part of the conversation. Striking a chord on the Board will require communication and that they are all in agreement when it comes to agenda setting for when they meet with the City Council. They need to be clearer, publicly, about how they discuss things as a Board. Once they make plans, they have to protect those plans and represent the Board in a fine manner. They have to be very clear tonight about the difference between the policies the Housing Commission will be setting and the Planning Board's future work with the ADB. She concluded that it was disconcerting to see the issue become so mottled, and she didn't want the confusion to continue at this meeting. Board Member Crank said she supports the ADB's recommendation and the flowchart that was attached to the Staff Report. The last thing that volunteers want to feel like is that their time and talent is not being utilized because their hands are being tied or that the work is not going down the right pathway for them to be effective. She recalled that, at the Planning Board's joint meeting with the City Council, Councilmember Johnson brought up that some items have been on the Planning Board's extended agenda for years. She would like these items to be revisited. She suggested that the 2020 Planning Board Chair should proactively work with staff to schedule these projects on the Board's extended agenda and find ways to incorporate the ADB where appropriate. Board Member Rosen said that whenever he considers potential changes, he tries to consider what issues might come up that will kill a new idea. He asked what are the worst things someone might say in opposition to the ADB's recommended changes. Chair Herr responded that, without the changes, good volunteers may decide to leave their position on the ADB. Board Member Rosen agreed that will be an outcome of the proposed change. Board Member Guenther commented that if the ADB is able to make recommendations directly to the City Council, it will appear they are being promoted a level up the chain. The current process requires the ADB to make recommendations to the Planning Board and then the Planning Board makes a recommendation to the City Council. Along the way, recommendations get modified, and what is eventually adopted may not be consistent with the ADB's original recommendation. He said it makes sense for the ADB to make recommendations directly to the City Council, but this change could raise some concerns. Board Member Owensby voiced concern that elements of an ADB recommendation can get lost in the translation as it is moved through the Planning Board and then to the City Council. The Planning Board may not have an adequate understanding of an ADB recommendation to clearly explain to the City Council why it is important. If the ADB, is able to make recommendations directly to the City Council, they can clearly explain their reasoning. Board Member Rosen agreed that many good ideas have been derailed by the current process, which is a compelling argument in support of the proposed changes. Mr. Chave said they may receive some pushback on the mandatory pre -application meeting requirement. He explained that pre -application meetings are not mandatory at this point. Quite a number of applicants do them anyway, but it is something else to make it mandatory. Some element of the development community is used to the current process, and adding a new step early in the process might cause some pushback. He said that, in his view, it isn't really a penalty to require a pre - application meeting; it just means that people will have to think of that earlier in the process. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 138 9.2.b Board Member Rosen asked if other jurisdictions in the region require pre -application meetings. Chari Herr said he works in a lot of jurisdictions, and most have pre -application meetings. He said he doesn't think they will receive a lot of pushback from the development community because they are used to it in most jurisdictions. Mr. Chave commented that some of the local developers are not used to pre -application meetings, but they provide a potential benefit, particularly if the City has a process for deviations to the standards. A pre -application meeting will allow the ADB to engage a prospective developer early enough that they can see possibilities they may not have recognized themselves. BOARD MEMBER ROSEN MOVED THAT THE BOARD ENDORSE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD AND SET UP A TIME TO CO -PRESENT THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION. Board Member Cloutier pointed out that, as proposed, the pre -application meeting would only be mandatory for significant projects and not every project. Developers of larger projects will have a different level of visibility anyway. Mr. Chave referred to the flowchart (Attachment 2) that was attached to the Staff Report, emphasizing that it is just a draft now. Once they get into the details of the process, they can set different thresholds, depending on where projects are located. For example, he can see that the threshold for mandatory pre -application meetings would be different for development in the downtown versus Highway 99, Westgate, etc. Board Member Owenby said he would like to make sure that any project that is publicly oriented should require a pre - application meeting. This would include development on Highway 99, downtown, Five Corners, etc. The threshold should be based on both size and location. Board Member Cloutier cautioned that it will be important to clearly define the threshold so it is easy for people on the outside to understand. The process outlined in the flowchart is simple, setting the threshold at projects that require State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. Chair Herr agreed that would be a good place to start. However, the pre -application meeting could remain an option for all projects, and some developers might take advantage of the opportunity. Board Member Rubenkonig said she has no comments regarding the contents of the Staff Report, but she is concerned that the ADB hasn't had enough time to consider their recommendation and some of their members are not present. She observed no action is required at this time. They can reconvene the joint meeting on a future date if necessary for the ADB to have more preparation time. Chair Herr responded that the ADB has discussed the recommendation at length in prior meetings. All members of the ADB have participated in the discussion and all are in agreement with the recommendation. Board Member Owensby clarified that the intent of his earlier comment is that the ADB hasn't had time to go beyond the initial recommendation to look at the specific design guidelines and design standards they might recommend in the future. Once again, Chair Herr reminded them that it will take small steps, starting with outlining the framework and gaining the Planning Board and City Council support. As they move forward, the details will all be fleshed out. Board Member Rubenkonig asked the Planning Board members why they are comfortable moving the ADB's recommendation on to the City Council. Board Member Cloutier clarified that they are not recommending a complete rewrite of the code. They are simply endorsing the three recommendations provided in Attachment 1 of the Staff Report, which outline what they want the ADB to be doing. The proposed recommendations set a vision for where the ADB should be going, and then the recommendations will be implemented with new actions. Board Member Monroe commented that the ADB recommendation represents a thoughtful process and is exactly the process he wants to have for the design review board. The proposed changes offer a great way to keep the citizen boards engaged, and they need to be able to fix things that aren't working. He is open to hearing the ADB's ideas for implementing the changes in the future. Chair Cheung said he appreciates the ADB's recommendation and found their arguments to be compelling. He supports empowering the ADB to do work where they can help the most. Rather than the ADB making a recommendation to the Planning Board and then the Planning Board making a recommendation to the City Council, he would support the ADB making their own recommendations to the City Council. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 139 9.2.b Vice Chair Robles said he is an engineer and works with architects. They rely on each other, and the working relationship is very important. It is also important that both boards represent the citizens. They need to take every opportunity to increase the weight of the citizen comments, and he trusts the architects on the ADB to do that. He looks forward to their active participation in forwarding the goal of protecting the health, safety and welfare of people and property. Board Member Rubenkonig clarified that the ADB is made up of a planner, a civil engineer, at least one architect, a design professional, and two representatives from the community. They are not all architects, but most are related to the design profession. She cautioned against an overemphasis on the ADB members all being architects when the reality is, they represent the design profession. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Board Member Rubenkonig left the meeting at 8:00 p.m. PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2020 — 2025 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CFP/CIP) Mr. English explained that the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is required by the Growth Management Act and covers a planning horizon of 6 to 20 years. It is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to the City's Level of Service (LOS) Standards. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, and it ties the projects to the various City funds and revenues. The CFP is required to be consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions on how often it can be amended. There are no restrictions tied to the CIP. The two plans intersect when identifying 6-year capital projects with funding sources. The CIP is organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six - year period. Mr. English explained that projects are added to the CFP and CIP based on adopted elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, the Transportation Plan and Utilities Plans all go through extensive public processes of updating and establishing policies and goals. The CIP is tied to the City's budget and several funds make up the overall document: • Fund 112 is a Transportation Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. It is funded via grants and the gas tax. • Fund 125 is a Capital Projects Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Departments. It is funded by the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET). • Fund 126 is a Special Capital Project and Parks Acquisition Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Departments. It is also funded by REET. • Fund 332 is a Parks Construction Fund that is managed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. It is funded by grants. • Fund 421 is the Water Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 422 is the Stormwater Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 423 is the Sewer and Wastewater Treatment Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. Mr. English shared highlights of 2019 Projects: The $1.8 million Pavement Preservation Program was a key part of the program for maintaining City streets. In 2019, the City overlaid 6.5 lane miles and 13 new Americans with Disabilities (ADA) ramps were added using funding from both the Street Overlay Program and the Utility Programs. The 89t1i Place Retaining Wall Project was funded with REET dollars. The project is on a small cul-de-sac street. The existing wall was failing and causing the street to settle and slope away. They were able to rebuild the rockery with a mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall and the project was completed last spring at a cost of about $125,000. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 140 9.2.b • The 841 Avenue Overlay Project started in the middle of September and is expected to be finished by mid -October. It is a combination of stormwater improvements plus 2-inch-grind overlay. It is a half -mile section between 2201 and 212' Streets. • The Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project was completed this year. • The Dayton Street Utility Improvement Project is in progress. They are currently paving Dayton from 3rd to 5t1i Avenues, and all of the utilities within that segment are being replaced. The final pavement work will be done on Friday if weather permits. There will be a break in activity, and the project will resume in March on the segment between 5t' and 9r' Avenues. • Phase 1 of the Seaview Infiltration Project was completed this summer and was funded by a State grant. The infiltration facility was installed in Seaview Park, itself, and collects stormwater off the Perrinville system and infiltrates it into the ground. The goal is to minimize the impact to the Perrinville system and the existing creek. The cost of the project was about $350,000. Mr. English also shared highlights of 2020 Projects: • The 2020 Pavement Preservation Program will be funded at $1.2 million, which should provide for about 3 lane miles of street overlay. • The Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Project is funded with federal dollars and will upgrade safety at nine intersections in the City, primarily by upgrading pedestrian ramps and installing rapid flashing beacons at crossings. A Hawk Signal will be installed at the intersection of SR-524 and 81 Avenue, similar to the HAWK signal on SR-104 near City Park. • The Highway 99 Revitalization Project will continue to go forward in 2020 using State funding. The corridor study has been completed and the City learned that the cost of upgrading Highway 99 with all of the streetscape and safety improvements would be well over $100 million, and the State's allocation was only $2 million. The City is working to pick the low -hanging fruit, installing center medians and taking out some of the turn lanes along the corridor to improve safety at high accident intersections. Staff will continue its work to secure additional grant funding to move other elements of the project forward. • The Dayton Street Walkway Project is also grant funded and part of the Main Street to 9t' Avenue Improvement Project. The portion between 5t' and 9r' Avenues will be constructed in 2020, and the portion between 3rd and 5t' Avenues is currently in progress. • REET funding will be used for the Pedestrian Safety Program, which started last year and is proposed to continue in 2020. Projects include flashing beacons at 31 Avenue and Bell Street, a project that was funded in 2019. The equipment has been purchased but hasn't been installed. • Several Traffic Signal Upgrades will be done in 2020. They will make several improvements to the existing control cabinets on Highway 99, and the program will continue into 2020 with improvements to signal detections. • The Guardrail System Program will continue into 2020, with replacement of existing guardrails that need upgraded and adding new guardrails in areas where they are needed. • The Traffic Calming Program has been in place for several years and will be funded with REET dollars in 2020. • The Dayton Street Utility Improvement Project will resume in March on the segment between 5' and 9r' Avenues. With the exception of the sewer line, all other utilities will be replaced. The existing sewer line will be refurbished with a cured -in -place pipe process, which is less costly. • The Water Utility Replacement Program will continue and the plan is to replace over 1,000 feet of watermain, including the work that is part of the Dayton Street Program. They will also overlay about .35 lanes miles of street, and most of that work is related to the Dayton Street Project. • The Stormwater Utility Program will replace 4,900 feet of pipe. • The Willow Creek Daylight Project will continue, with $750,000 identified for design. • Phase 2 of the Seaview Infiltration Facility Project will be another infiltration facility that adds capacity to the one that was completed in 2019. • The Ballinger Regional Facility Project is a predesign project that the City is evaluating the potential of building a new infiltration facility in Mathay Ballinger Park to try and minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on Lake Ballinger. • The Perrinville Creek Flow Management Project will continue to look for opportunities to install raingardens within the drainage basin to reduce runoff into the system. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 141 9.2.b • The Sewer Utility Program will replace 2,500 feet of sewer main and rehabilitate 6,300 feet of sewer pipe using the cured -in -place method, overlay 0.35 lane miles of street affected by sewer main replacement, and complete the Lake Ballinger Sewer Trunk Study. • Design will start on the Pyrolysis Project at the Sewer Treatment Plant in 2020. Ms. Burley noted that most of the park projects identified in the CIP and CFP fall within the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. She shared highlights of 2019 projects: • The first inclusive playground in the City was installed this year at Seaview Park. • All of the tennis courts at Seaview Park were refinished and the restroom was refurbished. • The Olympic Beach Restrooms were completely revamped. The project was scoped to be done by a contractor, but it ended up being done in house by City staff. This resulted in a significant savings, and the project turned out nice. • The Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project is ongoing. Staff believes they found a solution, and they are working to put together the pieces to float the labor underneath to seal it up. They are optimistic the project will be completed in 2020. • The City Park Walkway Project will happen this fall and includes widening the exit to allow for better pedestrian access. The work will be completed in house by a parks crew. • Design work is complete for the Gateway Sign Project. Next, Ms. Burley shared highlights of the proposed 2020 projects: • Civic Park was designed in 2019. The City has secured funding necessary to build the park, including a $2 million request from the 2020 budget. The $2 million request originally included $500,000 from the general fund, but that is no longer needed. The entire $2 million will be funded with balances in the various park funds, including the Park Impact Fee and REET funds. Everything associated with issuing the bonds has been completed. She summarized that $3.1 million of the project funding is in carry-over funds, $3.7 million bonds, and $3.4 million grants. The goal is to get to 90% design in December and submit for permits in November of this year. This will enable the City to issue a Request for Proposals in February or March of 2020 and break ground in the spring. Construction is expected to take one year to complete. The Parks staff is working diligently on solutions to handle the ground water and address the high-water table. The grade needs to be raised significantly enough to allow water to dissipate and for the drainage system to be above the current grade but below the new grade. They are also working to address water mitigation, which is incredibly difficult in addition to taking care of the onsite water. They are exploring options at Yost Park, which is in the same watershed, just upstream. There is potential to do some water infiltration at Yost Park, which will provide four mitigation credits for the Civic Park Project. • The Marina Beach Park Project will continue in 2020 and go hand -in -hand with the Willow Creek Daylighting Project. The Park needs to be designed simultaneously. RCO grants are coming up in 2020, and the design money will be spent to get the project to a place where they can submit confidently for grants for the project. They plan to submit three grant applications for this particular project. • Funding was included to support ongoing maintenance and repair at Yost Pool. In 2020, replacing and rehabilitating the pool grates will be the largest maintenance project. They will also replace the acid/chlorine injector and the pool cover. • The 41 Avenue Cultural Corridor is a significant project that will take longer than some people like. The estimated cost to design the project is about $350,000, and $50,000 has been spent to date. Another $100,000 is allocated in 2020 to continue the design work. Design is critical for the City to secure grant funding. To get much further, they will also need to identify some funding sources. • The City has identified a 1-acre parcel for a Community Garden. They had hoped to purchase it in 2019, but the Purchase and Sale Agreement still hasn't been finalized. The funds will be rolled into the 2020 CIP. • The City has plans for two outdoor fitness zones, one of which was programed in 2019. They were unable to get to the project, so both are now programmed in 2020. One will be at Civic Park and the other at Mathay Ballinger Park. The City received grant funding for the projects. • The Waterfront Redevelopment Project will continue in 2020. About half of the funding for the project was programmed in 2019 and the remaining half in 2020. This is not really a funding request; it is just a carryover of the budget that was identified in 2019. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 142 9.2.b Ms. Burley advised that the draft CIP and CFP also include a list of projects that go out beyond the 2020 timeline, such as relatively minor park improvements, ongoing maintenance, etc. Mr. English summarized that staff started development of the capital budgets in July and proposals were submitted to the Finance Department in August and September so that the draft CIP and CFP could be prepared. A public hearing before the Planning Board is scheduled for October 23'. Following the hearing, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation to the City Council. The plans will be presented to the City Council on November 4', and the Council will hold a public hearing on November 121. It is anticipated the City Council will adopt the plans before the end of December. Board Member Crank asked if the 234' Street/Highway 99 Traffic Signal Project would be done in tandem with the housing project that is supposed to take place at that intersection. Mr. English answered no. The traffic signal is part of a grant the City secured a few years ago for safety improvements and it is not tied to the housing development. Board Member Monroe requested more information about the $6.5 million that is identified in the CIP for professional service fees over the next five years. Mr. English responded that building maintenance is managed by the City's Facilities Manager. The allocation is intended to show the needed funding to maintain the facilities, and it won't necessarily all be used to fund engineering and design. It probably should be distributed to both construction and professional services, but the intent is to identify the dollar amount that needs to be programmed each year to maintain the City's facilities. Board Member Monroe noted that no funding is identified for traffic calming. Mr. English responded that the Traffic Calming Program was funded by the 112 Fund through 2019 via a General Fund contribution. Starting in 2020, the program will be funded with the REET 125 Fund at an amount of $15,000. Board Member Monroe asked Mr. English to explain the process for adding projects to the table on Page 187 of the Staff Report. Mr. English explained that there are several components that factor into when projects are added. The City Council has the ability to add projects, and staff can recommend projects to the City Council. Projects may be added because of maintenance reasons or because the City has an opportunity for grant funding. Citizen can also recommend projects. The projects on the list on Page 187 are new projects that were added throughout 2019 for potential funding. Chair Cheung requested an update on the Waterfront Walkway Project. Ms. Burley answered that the City is still in litigation. Chair Cheung asked how the delay will impact the Waterfront Redevelopment Project. Ms. Burley answered that while a few permits are connected, the projects are separate. They have cleared all of the milestones for the Waterfront Redevelopment Project and it will move forward. The City will continue with litigation on the connecting Waterfront Walkway. Student Representative Bryan said he had fun looking through all of the proposed sidewalk additions. He said he runs cross country for the high school, and he and his team run about 8 miles per day throughout the community. While he sees clear reasoning for many of the proposed projects, there were others where there is already a wide shoulder and very little vehicular traffic. He said he would prefer not being confined to a little sidewalk in these locations. He asked Mr. English to speak to the criteria that is used to identify projects for the CFP and CIP. Mr. English responded that a number of factors are considered when selecting projects for the CIP and CFP, including the Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Transportation Plan that is updated every six years. Updating the Transportation Plan involves a public process where the City seeks input from the public on potential projects. A citizen committee is formed to evaluate and rank the projects. In 2015 the committee reviewed a long list of potential sidewalk projects that were categorized and ranked. The final list provides the basic groundwork for what shows up in the transportation section of the CFP. The priorities also help staff identify projects to seek funding for. He emphasized that there isn't a lot of funding. The capital program for streets is only $150,000, as most of the REET funding goes towards preservation work and parks projects. They have a long list of needs relative to walkway projects but a shortage of funding. The City's Transportation Engineer has been very successful in the past securing grant funding. Student Representative Bryan summarized that a major part of the prioritization is based on citizen input in monetary form. Mr. English explained that grants are typically issued by the Federal or State Government. Board Member Cloutier referred to the 196' Street/88' Avenue Intersection Improvement Project, noting that the recommendation for a signal in that location is based on a model that was done in 2009. He suggested that perhaps they Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 143 9.2.b should review the improvement as a potential roundabout instead of yet another signal. He said he loves the roundabout at Five Corners. Mr. English advised that this project has a long history. It doesn't meet warrants for a signal, and that's why a signal has not been installed. One of the challenges with using a roundabout in that location is the line of sight and the inability to see all of the different movements within a roundabout. It will be a challenge on whatever improvement is built at the intersection, and he agreed that a roundabout should be one of the options considered. Board Member Cloutier suggested they also consider a roundabout at the intersection of Main Street and 9r' Avenue. Mr. English advised that, if the City is able to secure funding for improvements at that intersection, a roundabout would definitely be one of the options considered. Chair Cheung pointed out that traffic backs up at the Intersection of 761 Avenue and 1961 Street. At certain times, traffic backs up on 76r'', and he has witnessed several accidents when people try to turn left out of the QFC parking lot. He asked if the intersection is in Lynnwood or Edmonds. Mr. English answered that the intersection is controlled by the City of Lynnwood, and he can take the concern to the City's Traffic Engineer to pass on to the City of Lynnwood. Chair Cheung asked if it would be possible to widen 76' Avenue as it approaches the intersection. Mr. English responded that the Edmonds portion of 76t1i Avenue is south of the QFC, but it becomes Edmonds again north of the intersection. Again, he agreed to pass on the concern. However, he acknowledged that doing a widening project at the intersection would be very costly. Perhaps they could look at the operation of the signal to see if anything can be done with channelization to address the concern. Vice Chair Robles referred to the SR-104/951 Place West Intersection Improvement Project and asked what participation the State would have and how much empathy they have for what is going on at the four corners of the intersection where more population density is planned. He asked what $420,000 would buy to mitigate for all that is going on at that intersection. Mr. English pointed out that the 2281 Street Improvement Project would tie into the improvements at this location because it will provide direct access to the transit station in Mountlake Terrace. When they get to the stage of improving 2281 Street, they could potentially redesign the intersection to make it function better in both its connection to residential communities and the transit station. He acknowledged that the $420,000 shown in the CIP will not solve the problem. The scheduled improvements are just trying to improve access management at the intersection by putting in C curbs, creating ramps at intersections, and improving pedestrian safety at crossings. He agreed to forward Vice Chair Robles' question to the Transportation Engineer with a request to provide more information about the scope of the improvements. Vice Chair Robles asked if future problems at the intersection could be blamed on inactivity on the part of the City because it failed to attend to the issues. Mr. English said there is nothing on the near horizon for doing any city -sponsored work at the intersection. However, there is a private development on the south side of SR-104 that could result in some changes to access. Vice Chair Robles asked if there is a proposed action that involves all four corners of the intersection, or just two corners. Mr. English said there is an active proposal for the south side, but he isn't sure about the status of the north side. Chair Cheung said he likes the crosswalk light on 212r' Street near the high school. He asked if they are expensive to install. Mr. English said they cost between $15,000 and $20,000 per system. Chair Cheung suggested that the City consider providing the systems around schools where there is heavy pedestrian traffic. Mr. English agreed and said the Traffic Engineer is always looking for opportunities to install the systems. He noted that a system would be added on 84' Avenue as part of a project that is currently under construction, and another would be added at the intersection of 3rd Avenue and Dayton Street. In addition, seven of the nine locations included in the Citywide Pedestrian Safety Improvement Program will have rapid flashing beacons added at the crosswalks. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION (REFERRED FROM THE CITY COUNCIL) Mr. Chave explained that there are various implementation actions in the Comprehensive Plan relative to housing. One in the Housing Element talks about developing a Housing Strategy by 2019. He recalled that the City considered a Housing Strategy at the end of 2018, but the City Council elected not to adopt it. Instead, they formed a Housing Commission. Because the Commission's work is scheduled to take place during 2019 and 2020, the Council felt it was appropriate to modify the related implementation action that identified 2019 as the date for developing the Housing Strategy. Council - adopted Resolution 1420 identified two options to consider as ways to amend the implementation action in the plan, and staff Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 144 9.2.b has also identified a third option. He explained that the first two options were developed by the Council by resolution prior to the establishment of the Housing Commission. Option 3 was developed by staff in response to the Housing Commission being started. It reads, "Provide housing policy options by the end of 2020 for City Council consideration. " He noted that the Housing Commission's work is supposed to be done by the end of 2020. Staff s recommendation is that the Board choose one of the three options to forward to the city Council so that the Comprehensive Plan can be appropriately updated. Board Member Monroe asked what happens if they get to the end of 2020 and the work has still not been completed. Would they have to go through the same process again to amend the Comprehensive Plan to change the date to 2021. Mr. Chave answered affirmatively. Board Member Monroe suggested that a better approach would be to use the language in Option 2, but eliminate the date. The amendment would read, "Develop a strategy for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs. Board Member Crank said her understanding was that the City Council determined that the Housing Commission would sunset at the end of 2020. If the recommendation exceeds that date, it could get push back because it goes beyond what the City Council has already identified as a sunset date. Board Member Monroe said his suggestion was to eliminate the date entirely. Mr. Chave advised that a public hearing on the proposed amendment is scheduled for October 23ra REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Cheung reviewed that the Board's October 23ra meeting agenda will include a Housing Commission Update, a public hearing on the 2020 — 2025 CIP/CFP and a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan amendment regarding housing implementation. The November 13' meeting agenda will include a presentation on potential amendments to the Commercial Waterfront Zone to allow lodging or hotels as permitted uses, a presentation and potential amendments to the unit lot subdivision application procedure, and an update on the Vision 2050 Multicounty Planning Policies. The December 11' meeting agenda will include a public hearing on potential amendments to the Commercial Waterfront Zone to allow lodging or hotels as permitted uses, and a public hearing on potential amendments to the unit lot subdivision application procedure. The November 27t1i and December 25t' meetings were cancelled. The Board agreed to add "Election of 2020 Officers" to the November 13' agenda. Board Member Rosen recalled that, at their last meeting, the Board reviewed a list of agenda items that they hoped could be placed on the extended agenda. The agenda items were identified in the Board's discussions with the City Council at the joint meeting. Chair Cheung said he would like to work with the 2020 Planning Board Officers and staff to schedule the items into the 2020 agenda. The Board agreed that the items should be listed as "pending" on the next Extended Agenda. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Cheung did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS There were no Planning Board comments. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:59 p.m. Planning Board Minutes October 9, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 145 9.2.c CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Meeting October 23, 2019 Chair Cheung called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 51 Avenue North. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Matthew Cheung, Chair Daniel Robles, Vice Chair Alicia Crank Nathan Monroe Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig Mike Rosen Conner Bryan, Student Representative BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Roger Pence (excused) Todd Cloutier (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Rob English, City Engineer Shannon Burley, Deputy Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder Board Member Rubenkonig commented that she appreciated the description provided in the minutes regarding the differences and similarities between the Capital Facilities Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan. BOARD MEMBER ROSEN MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2019 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no audience comments. Packet Pg. 146 9.2.c DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Cheung referred the Board to the Development Services Director's Report that was provided in the packet. There were no comments or questions from the Board. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED 2020 - 2025 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP)/ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) Mr. English explained that the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is required by the Growth Management Act to identify long-term capital needs to address the City's growth. It covers a planning horizon of 6 and 20 years with projects to address level of service (LOS), safety and transportation. The CIP is organized by the City's financial funds and includes projects in the next 6-year planning horizon. The two plans intersect when identifying the 6-year capital projects with funding sources. Mr. English explained that projects are added to the CFP and CIP based on adopted elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, the Transportation Plan and Utilities Plans all go through extensive public processes of updating and establishing policies and goals. The CIP is tied to the City's budget and several funds make up the overall document: • Fund 112 is a Transportation Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. It is funded via grants and the gas tax. • Fund 125 is a Capital Projects Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Departments. It is funded by the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET). • Fund 126 is a Special Capital Project and Parks Acquisition Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Departments. It is also funded by REET. • Fund 332 is a Parks Construction Fund that is managed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. It is funded by grants. • Fund 421 is the Water Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 422 is the Stormwater Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 423 is the Sewer and Wastewater Treatment Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. Mr. English shared highlights of 2019 Fund 112 Projects: • The $1.8 million Pavement Preservation Program was a key part of the program for maintaining City streets. In 2019, the City overlaid 6.5 lane miles and 13 new Americans with Disabilities (ADA) ramps were added using funding from the Street Overlay Program and the Utility Programs. • The 891 Place Retaining Wall Project was funded with REET dollars. The project is on a small cul-de-sac street. The existing wall was failing and causing the street to settle and slope away. The rockery was replaced with a mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall and the project was completed last spring at a cost of about $125,000. • The 84r' Avenue Overlay Project started in the middle of September. It is a combination of stormwater improvements plus a 2-inch-grind overlay on a half -mile section between 220' and 212' Streets. The project includes replacing 17 curb ramps to be ADA complaint, and it is likely the overlay portion of the project will extend into 2020. The overlay portion of the project was funded by a federal grant the City received a few years ago, and only a small local match was required. • The Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project was completed this year. The older 1.5-million-gallon tank presented a lot more challenges that required additional budget appropriation, but work on the 3-million-gallon tank went smoothly. The project cost was close to $4 million. • The Dayton Street Utility Improvement Project is in progress. They are currently paving Dayton from 3rd to 51h Avenues. The project includes replacement of 1,200 feet of water main, 1,200 feet of storm pipe, and 1,300 feet of sewer pipe, followed by a complete reconstruction of the street. There will be a break in activity, and the project will resume in March on the segment between 5' and 9' Avenues. • Phase 1 of the Seaview Infiltration Project was completed this summer and was funded by a State grant. An infiltration facility was installed to take stormwater off the Perrinville system and infiltrate it into the ground. The Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 147 9.2.c goal is to minimize the impact to the Perrinville system and the existing creek. The cost of the project was about $350,000. Mr. English also shared highlights of 2020 Projects: • The 2020 Pavement Preservation Program will be funded at $1.1 million, which should provide for about 3 lane miles of street overlay. • The Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Project is funded with federal dollars and will upgrade safety at 7 intersections in the City, primarily by upgrading pedestrian ramps and installing rectangular rapid flashing beacons at crossings. A Hawk Signal will be installed at the intersection of SR-524 and 81 Avenue, similar to the HAWK signal on SR-104 near City Park. • The Highway 99 Revitalization Project will continue to go forward in 2020 utilizing a $10 million state grant. The corridor study has been completed and the City learned that the cost of upgrading Highway 99 with all of the streetscape and safety improvements would be well over $100 million. The City is now taking a different approach going forward, installing center medians and taking out some of the turn lanes along the corridor to improve safety at high accident intersections. Staff will continue its work to secure additional grant funding to move other elements of the project forward. • The Dayton Street Walkway Project is also grant funded and part of the Main Street to 9t' Avenue Improvement Project. The portion between 5' and 9r' Avenues will be constructed in 2020, and the portion between 3rd and 5t' Avenues is currently in progress. • REET funding will be used for the Pedestrian Safety Program, which started last year and is proposed to continue in 2020. Projects include flashing beacons at 31 Avenue and Bell Street, a project that was funded in 2019. The equipment has been purchased but hasn't been installed. • Several Traffic Signal Upgrades will be done in 2020. They have made a lot of progress over the last three to four years and work will continue into 2020. • The Guardrail System Program will continue into 2020, with replacement of existing guardrails that need upgraded and adding new guardrails in areas where they are needed. • The Traffic Calming Program has been in place for several years and will be funded with REET dollars in 2020. In previous years, the program was funded via the 112 Fund. • The Dayton Street Utility Improvement Project will resume in March on the segment between 5' and 9r' Avenues. With the exception of the sewer line, all other utilities will be replaced. The existing sewer line will be refurbished with a cured -in -place pipe process, which is less costly. • The Water Utility Replacement Program will continue and the plan is to replace over 8,000 feet of watermain, including the work that is part of the Dayton Street Program. They will also overlay about .35 lanes miles of street, and most of that work is related to the Dayton Street Project. • The Stormwater Utility Program will replace 4,900 feet of pipe. • The Willow Creek Daylight Project will continue, with $750,000 identified for design. An update on the project was recently provided to the City Council. • Phase 2 of the Seaview Infiltration Facility Project will be another infiltration facility that adds capacity to the one that was completed in 2019. • The Ballinger Regional Facility Project is a predesign project that the City is evaluating the potential of building a new infiltration facility in Mathay Ballinger Park to try and minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on Lake Ballinger. • The Perrinville Creek Flow Management Project will continue to look for opportunities to install raingardens within the drainage basin to reduce runoff into the system. • The Sewer Utility Program will replace 2,500 feet of sewer main and rehabilitate 6,300 feet of sewer pipe using the cured -in -place method, overlay 0.35 lane miles of street affected by sewer main replacement, and complete the Lake Ballinger Sewer Trunk Study. • Design will start on the Pyrolysis Project at the Sewer Treatment Plant in 2020. Ms. Burley noted that most of the park projects identified in the CIP and CFP fall within the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. She reminded them of the decision criteria that goes into choosing parks projects and then shared highlights of 2019 projects: Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 148 9.2.c • The first inclusive playground in the City was installed this year at Seaview Park. • All of the tennis courts at Seaview Park were refinished and the restroom was refurbished. • The Olympic Beach Restrooms were completely revamped. The project was scoped to be done by a contractor, but it ended up being done in house by City staff. • The Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project is ongoing and will likely extend into the spring of 2020. They have found a solution and have submitted the final permits and designs. • The City Park Walkway Project will happen this fall and includes widening the exit to allow for better pedestrian access. The work will be completed in house by a parks crew. • The Gateway Sign is currently being constructed. Next, Ms. Burley shared highlights of the proposed 2020 projects: • Civic Park was designed in 2019. The City has secured funding necessary to build the park, including a $2 million request from the 2020 budget. The $2 million request originally included $500,000 from the general fund, but that is no longer needed. The entire $2 million will be funded with balances in the various park funds, including the Park Impact Fee and REET funds. Everything associated with issuing the bonds has been completed. She summarized that $3.1 million of the project funding is in carry-over funds, $3.7 million bonds, and $3.4 million grants. The project is currently at 50% design, and the goal is to get to 90% design in December and submit for permits in November of this year. This will enable the City to issue a Request for Proposals in February or March of 2020 and break ground in late spring or summer. Construction is expected to take one year to complete. • The Marina Beach Park Project will continue in 2020 and go hand -in -hand with the Willow Creek Daylighting Project. The proposed $30,000 will be used for design to prepare the project for grant applications in 2020. RCO grants are coming up in 2020. • Funding was included to support ongoing maintenance and repair at Yost Pool. In 2020, replacing and rehabilitating the pool grates will be the largest maintenance project. They will also replace the acid/chlorine injector and the pool cover. • The 4r' Avenue Cultural Corridor is currently in the design phase, and the estimated cost for design is about $350,000. About $50,000 has been spent to date, and another $100,000 is allocated in 2020 to continue the design work. Design is critical for the City to secure grant funding. • The City has identified a 1-acre parcel for a Community Garden. They had hoped to purchase it in 2019, but the Purchase and Sale Agreement still hasn't been finalized. The funds will be rolled into the 2020 CIP. • The City has plans for two outdoor fitness zones, one of which was programed in 2019. They were unable to get to the project, so both are now programmed in 2020. One will be at Civic Park and the other at Mathay Ballinger Park. The City received grant funding for the projects. • The Waterfront Redevelopment Project will continue in 2020. About half of the funding for the project was programmed in 2019 and the remaining half in 2020. This is not really a funding request; it is just a carryover of the budget that was identified in 2019. Ms. Burley advised that the draft CIP and CFP also include a list of future projects that go out beyond the 2020 timeline, such as relatively minor park improvements, ongoing maintenance, etc. The City will continue to set aside funds for future land acquisition, as well. Mr. English summarized that staff started development of the capital budgets in July and proposals were submitted to the Finance Department in August and September so that the draft CIP and CFP could be prepared. The CIP and CFP were presented to the Board at a workshop on October 91. Following the hearing tonight, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation to the City Council. The plans will be presented to the City Council on November 41, and the Council will hold a public hearing on November 12'. It is anticipated the City Council will adopt the plans before the end of December. Board Member Crank asked about the schedule for 234r' Street/Highway 99 Traffic Signal Project. Mr. English answered that the intent is to start the project in February or March of 2020, but the actual signal will not likely be activated until late fall of 2020. Board Member Crank asked if the City will need to do a traffic study to identify the traffic patterns at the intersection. Mr. English answered that the City was required to coordinate with the Washington State Department of Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 149 9.2.c Transportation (WSDOT) and obtain approval for the project. There was some assessment on how the intersection would operate from a Level of Service (LOS) standpoint, and WSDOT has approved the project. Board Member Monroe asked if area equity was a factor in scoring and identifying projects for the CIP. Mr. English explained that they rely heavily on the City's current planning documents and grant funding opportunities to identify transportation projects for the CIP. The scope of the work plays a significant role in the City's ability to obtain grant funding, so the City doesn't have a lot of ability to distribute capital projects based on area equity. However, on the preservation side, they try to focus on different pockets of the City as the programs continue year to year. Ms. Burley said most parks projects are related to maintenance, but the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan looks at underserved areas where there are no parks. From a land acquisition point of view, one of the first criteria is looking for areas that are underserved by parks. Board Member Rubenkonig said that when she looked at the overview of projects, her initial sense was that more projects will take place in the downtown area. However, she also recognized that this area is more densely populated. It is also important to keep in mind that there are a large number of drainage basins throughout the City that must also be maintained. It is important for the public to understand why the City needs to put money towards the highest and best uses. The need to keep the drainage basins operating drives some of the necessary decision making. Regarding transparency, Board Member Rubenkonig commented that it is important that citizens can understand the reports and that they are laid out in a way that nothing appears to be hidden. They need to be written in a language that citizens can understand. She said she enjoyed the information provided in the staff's presentation, particularly the information explaining where the funding will come from. However, she would have liked the information to be on the slides provided for each of the projects, too. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if Parks projects are funded entirely by one fund. Ms. Burley answered that a significant amount of the park funding comes from Real Estate Excise Taxes (REET) via the 125 and 126 funds. The 332 fund is the grant exchange fund. Again, Board Member Rubenkonig said it would be helpful to show funding sources on the slides for each project. Student Representative Bryan asked if the traffic calming involves installation of speed bumps. Mr. English answered that radar speed feedback signs are the primary approach for the traffic calming program. There are both pros and cons associated with speed humps. While they do slow traffic, they tend to cause people to break and accelerate more, and this results in increased noise in residential neighborhoods. They goal is to find other ways to solve speeding issues and speed humps are the last resort. The signs have been effective and they try to rotate them into different areas. Student Representative Bryan agreed that the radar speed signs are more effective than speed humps. Vice Chair Robles asked where the proposed community garden would be located, and Ms. Burley answered that it would be just east of the entrance to Yost Park. The one -acre parcel is being gifted to the City as part of a will; but in the meantime, it is the owner's desire that the City build the community garden while she is still here to see it. Vice Chair Robles commented that Meadowdale Field is being utilized in orders of magnitude greater than it was used before. He said he is a strong advocate for creating and improving the social fabric of the City. He also commented that the improvements at Seaview Park are beautiful. He said he appreciates all of the projects the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department and Public Works Department are able to accomplish each year. He asked if there are currently enough staff resources. Mr. English reported that Public Works just filled a few vacancies, but they are still down one employee. There are few large projects coming up in 2020, including Civic Park, Waterfront Redevelopment, and Wastewater Treatment Plant. There are often constraints associated with managing the workload, and Public Works often hires consultants to help manage the large projects. Board Member Crank asked Mr. English to speak to whether or not the pedestrian crossing projects would also involve lighting improvements or adjustments. She said she lives at 236' and Highway 99 where there have been numerous accidents and lighting seems to be a factor. There are numerous types of lighting on Highway 99, but it still gets quite dark in some locations. Mr. English said he is not familiar enough with the project designs to know if new street lighting will be added, but his recollection is that there will just be some minor adjustments. Board Member Crank asked if flashing lights could be added in the pavement, similar to what was done on 212t' Street near the high school. Mr. English said the City is Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 150 9.2.c steering away from that approach because they have had maintenance issues. The Citywide pedestrian improvement projects will not have inground lights, but there will be lights on the side. Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that during the Board's review of the CIP/CFP in 2018, Board Member Cheung suggested that the City consider providing a covered area for pedestrians at Holmes Corner across the street from Edmonds- Woodway High School. She also expressed the need for more design elements at that intersection. At that time, staff had agreed to consider these two ideas. Mr. English agreed that it would be great to provide a covered pedestrian area at the intersection, but from a funding standpoint, he is not sure the project would rank high enough to be included in the CIP. Board Member Rubenkonig said she would still like to see what could be done to improve the intersection. She also voiced concern about the lane channelization at the intersection as you head westbound on 761 Avenue. It seems to be unclear as to where the turn lane starts and the lines are inconsistent with other intersections in the City. Mr. English agreed to pass this concern on to the Traffic Engineer. No one in the audience indicated a desire to participate in the public hearing, and the hearing was closed. CHAIR CHEUNG MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE DRAFT 2020 — 2025 CIP/CFP TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION (REFERRED BY THE CITY COUNCIL) Mr. Chave explained that the Comprehensive Plan elements have implementation actions that indicate additional steps the City intends to take to move forward goals and policies. One in the Housing Element talks about developing a Housing Strategy by 2019. He reviewed that the City Council recently established a Housing Commission to study housing policy issues. Because the Commission's work is scheduled to take place during 2019-2020, the City Council felt it was appropriate to modify the related implementation action contained in the Housing Element, which identifies 2019 as the date for developing a "Housing Strategy." They adopted Resolution #1420, which provides two options to consider as ways to amend the implementation action in the plan. Given that the City Council recently created a Housing Commission that is scheduled to sunset at the end of 2020, staff has also identified a third option. The issue was forwarded to the Planning Board for a public hearing and recommendation. He reviewed the options as follows: • City Council Option 1 — Delete the existing language in its entirety. • City Council Option 2 — Amend the existing language to read, "Develop a strategy by 2020 for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs. " • Staff Option 3 — Amend the existing language to read, "Provide housing policy options by the end of 2020 for City Council consideration. " Mr. Chave said staff is recommending Option 3, as it best reflects where the City Council is at this point in time. Again, he said the Housing Commission is set to sunset at the end of 2020, and it is supposed to forward its recommendations to the City Council by that date. Board Member Monroe asked if the implementation action item would have to be amended again in 2020 if the Housing Commission does meet the deadline for presenting recommendations to the City Council. Mr. Chave responded that the Housing Commission has a pretty definite date for completing its work and reporting back to the City Council by the end of 2020. There is some urgency to the Commission's agenda and actions, and it intends to meet that date. Board Member Monroe summarized that because the Commission has a charter date of 2020, it might make sense to be silent on the date and let the charter dictate the timeframe for the implementation action. Mr. Chave explained that implementation actions are statements of intent, and having a date makes it clear that the action is important to move forward. It provides a milepost in the plan that helps people understand the City's current priorities. While a date is not required, it would be helpful. Board Member Monroe said his thought was that removing the date from the implementation action would eliminate the need to change the Comprehensive Plan in two places if the City Council decides to extend the work of the Housing Commission beyond 2020. He said he would also support Option 1, which would eliminate the implementation action item entirely. Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 151 9.2.c Mr. Chave explained that when the City Council adopted Resolution #1420, it hadn't yet created the Housing Commission and staff created Option 3 in response the Commission's charter. Board Member Rubenkonig observed that even if the Housing Commission presents its recommendations to the City Council by the end of 2020, the City Council may decide to extend the Housing Commission's charter to allow them to do additional work. Mr. Chave agreed that is possible, but it is more likely the City Council will find that the Housing Commission has accomplished its mission. At that time, the City Council will determine the best approach for moving the recommendations forward. Board Member Rosen observed that the City Council is looking for a recommendation from the Housing Commission. He recalled that when the Planning Board met jointly with the City Council, they expressed a sincere desire to be an informal part of the process. He questioned it if would be appropriate to recommend inserting a requirement for Planning Board participation into the implementation action language. He reminded them that one of their responsibilities is to provide recommendations to the City Council when they have strong opinions, and housing is one of those topics. Vice Chair Robles said his impression at the joint meeting with the City Council was that the Planning Board was not to get involved with the Housing Commission's work. He expressed his belief that the Housing Commission's timeframe will be dictated more by public input and velocity of public input. He questioned the ability to impose a limit on public input. He felt the process should go as long as necessary to solicit input from as many citizens as possible. He concluded that the issues are not so simple that they can be resolved in one year. There are so many factors emerging that can impact the final recommendations and some sort of contingency plan should be in place. Board Member Crank stressed the need to work smarter and not harder and authorize resources in the best way possible. The worse -case scenario is that the Housing Commission and City Council decide to extend into 2021. If that is the case, Options 2 and 3 would require an additional amendment to change the date. She suggested that Option 1 might be the best solution since it wouldn't require additional staff and Planning Board time to go through another public process to amend the timeframe in the future if necessary. Mr. Chave explained that most implementation actions in the Comprehensive Plan include general target dates that allow the projects to be added to the work plans of the City Council and various City departments. Given that the Housing Commission is intended to finish relatively soon, Board Member Crank said she would lean towards Options 1 or 2 to avoid having to come back and spend time changing the date again. Board Member Rosen said he supports giving the public a timeline for when an implementation action will be delivered. However, they must recognize that conditions and information will change, necessitating the need for deadlines to be adjusted. He said he supports the timeline, which sets up an expectation to the public and sends a signal to the City Council that the project should not go on for an extended period of time. Board Member Rubenkonig commented that Board Member Rosen brought up a good point about Planning Board involvement in the process. Although both the City Council and staff have indicated that the Board would be involved in the process at some point at the request of the City Council, she would like the Board Members to have an opportunity to provide feedback and share their points of view. She asked if there is something more formal that would establish that the Housing Commission would present its findings to the Planning Board for feedback prior to presenting their recommendations to the City Council for action. Mr. Chave explained that the City Council established the Housing Commission to provide policy options. Once the Housing Commission has completed its work and presented its recommendations, it will be up to the City Council to decide the best approaches for implementation. Implementation strategies that require Comprehensive Plan and Development Code amendments will be referred to the Planning Board. Mr. Chave explained that the document that was prepared by a consultant and sent through the Planning Board for a public hearing and recommendation to the City Council was a housing strategy and not an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. It was a set of potential ideas or actions the City could take to address housing needs. The City Council determined that it wanted to have a more robust public process and discussion, and the Housing Commission was created to complete that task. The Planning Board's role is to advise the City Council, but most of its work is related to codes and plans. The Housing Strategy is different. Although it was run through the Planning Board initially, it was not a requirement. The project is moving a different direction now. The idea of the process going forward is that the Housing Commission will provide the City Council with a number of ideas and policies and then the City Council will decide the next steps. They may refer some Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 152 9.2.c things back to the Planning Board (Development Code and Comprehensive Plan amendments), but the City Council could elect to take action on certain items that do not require Planning Board input. The Planning Board's role moving forward will depend on what the City Council decides to do. At this time, it is unclear exactly what that set of actions or referrals might be. He suggested it would be prudent to wait for the Housing Commission to complete its task and report to the City Council, and then the City Council can decide the next steps. Denise Miller, Edmonds, said she is a member of the Housing Commission and there is no plan at this time to extend the Commission beyond 2020. The Commission will provide periodic updates to the City Council, and the intent is to be very transparent throughout the process. As the Commission gets into discussions about different ideas and policies, it is likely that groups of Commissioners will be assigned to work on specific suggestions. The group is diverse and plans to take its information out to different areas of the City. The goal is to involve all interested citizens in the discussion and make sure that all information is made available to the public. No minutes will be prepared for the Commission meetings, but video recordings will be available on the City's website. Again, she said the Commission will provide periodic updates to the City Council and the Commission does not plan to go beyond the 2020 deadline. The idea is to get the work done and move on. The Planning Board will not be precluded from getting involved, but its participation will depend on what the City Council determines its role in the decision -making process should be. Board Member Rosen asked if the Housing Commission would simply provide a list of options for the City Council to consider or if it would provide a recommendation for specific policies and/or strategies. He pointed out that Option 2 calls for developing a strategy and Option 3 calls for providing housing policy options. Mr. Chave said "policy options" means a series of ideas that would logically lead to additional future actions. He does not anticipate that the Housing Commission will be involved in writing code or doing the type of detailed work that the Planning Board is responsible to do. Instead, they will provide a recommendation on the direction the City should go and address various housing needs and options. The Housing Commission is not intended to dive into the specific details of the code. Instead, they are to recommend general things the City should explore and expand upon to address housing issues. Strategies will take the general policies to the next step of implementation. He summarized that the Housing Commission's recommendations will presumably lead to Comprehensive Plan and Development Code amendments. Vice Chair Robles suggested that Option 1 would provide the greatest flexibility and be more efficient. Commissioner Monroe voiced concern that Option 3 extends beyond the scope of what the City Council asked the Board to do because it redefines the scope of the Housing Commission. He said he support either Option 1 or Option 2. Board Member Rubenkonig said she doesn't see much difference between Options 2 and 3; it is a simple matter of semantics. She likes the idea of "providing housing policy options" as opposed to "developing a strategy for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting the diverse housing needs." Board Member Rosen said the record shows that, on multiple occasions throughout its review of the Housing Strategy, the Planning Board talked about the public process being inadequate. Rather than being a power grab, the Planning Board was the initial voice that the outreach program needed to be more robust. The City Council's decision to step back and form a Housing Commission was good. What was not wrong in the original process is that the Planning Board was an important part of the receptacle for hearing and processing ideas and concepts. That is part of the Planning Board's role, and that part of the process should remain intact. The City Council's decision to form the Housing Commission was in response to citizen input. They want to hear from the citizens without stacking the deck in any way, and the Housing Commission meets that intent. However, he doesn't believe the Planning Board's involvement is any less important in the current process than it was the first time around. The Planning Board should be part of the work, and it would make sense for the Planning Board and Housing Commission to engage in joint conversations. While the Housing Commission would continue to report directly to the City Council, the Planning Board could add value to the Housing Commission by providing valuable input. BOARD MEMBER ROSEN MOVED THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND OPTION 3, WITH ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "PROVIDE HOUSING POLICY OPTIONS BY THE END OF 2020 FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION, INCLUDING INPUT FROM THE PLANNING BOARD." VICE CHAIR ROBLES SECONDED THE MOTION. Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 153 9.2.c Board Member Crank questioned how the discussion got from simply changing the date of the implementation action to the idea that the Planning Board would not be part of the process. The Planning Board has been part of the process up to this point. She cautioned against making the latter statement. She said she cannot justify its inclusion because she doesn't see how anything has changed. Board Member Rosen commented that the additional language gets rid of the ambiguity. He recalled that the City Council made it clear that it is a Housing Commission project and the Planning Board should stand down. The City Council and staff have both indicated that the Planning Board would not be involved in the process until after the Housing Commission has present its policy recommendations. The additional language indicates the Board's desire to be part of the Housing Commission's process, and the City Council can decide whether to adopt it or not. Student Representative Bryan said he would favor the inclusion of a date as part of the implementation action because it provides more transparency and informs the public of what the plan is for the Housing Commission. Board Member Crank concurred. Board Member Crank asked if the proposed motion would imply that the Board's input is required before the Housing Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council. She cautioned that requiring Planning Board input before presenting a proposal to the Commission would add more time to the process. Board Member Rubenkonig clarified that it is not the Planning Board's intent to be the judge and jury for the Housing Commission's recommendation. It is not the Planning Board's role to give a stamp of approval to the Housing Commission's work. Board Member Monroe commented that the Planning Board has been interested in the housing issue for a long time, and now they are being told to step back. Board Member Rubenkonig said the Board was never told by the City Council or the Development Services Director that they would be out of the loop. However, the Housing Commission will not be required to consult with the Planning Board as it goes about its business. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Board Member Monroe pointed out that the Extended Agenda indicates that a Housing Commission Update was supposed to have been on the October 23rd agenda. Mr. Chave said the update will likely take place on November 13' and will be provided by the Development Services Director. Chair Cheung asked that "Election of Planning Board Officers" be added to the November 131 agenda. He also reminded staff of the items the Planning Board wanted to add to the "Pending" list. Mr. Chave said he hasn't had a chance to formally add the items to the extended agenda, but he would do so by the next meeting. Board Member Rosen suggested that Chair Cheung review the extended agenda prior to the next packet being posted to make sure the items are included. Mr. Chave said that may be tricky, depending on timing, but he agreed to try. Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that, at the Planning Board's joint meeting with the Architectural Design Board (ADB), there was some discussion about the two boards working together to update the detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) regulations. She noted that there are many illegal ADUs in the City, and they are at a place where the design criteria currently in place prohibits property owners from providing such housing for family members. She is not suggesting that policy changes be made, but the criteria could be updated. Mr. Chave clarified that the current code does not allow detached ADUs, even for family members. However, ADUs that are attached by a breezeway that meets the definition in the code are considered attached ADUs. Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that perhaps it is time to reconsider the attachment criteria. Mr. Chave said the current code contains general language that says if you are constructing an ADU, it needs to be done in such a way that is consistent with the design of the existing house so it looks like one structure. That is as far as the guidelines go. An ADU must resemble a single-family house. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the ADU criteria is Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 154 9.2.c generally left up to staff s interpretation, and Mr. Chave answered affirmatively. He explained that staff generally looks at whether the ADU would have similar materials, colors, etc. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if Mr. Chave sees potential for the Planning Board to work with the ADB to review the ADU criteria. Mr. Chave said he isn't sure what the end result would be. Board Member Rubenkonig said the standards are old and need to be updated. Mr. Chave explained that the most substantial changes would come after the Housing Commission has presented its recommendations to the City Council and the City Council has indicated a desire to consider detached ADUs. At that point, the Board would become involved in the process and would have an opportunity to identify potential design parameters. For attached ADU's, which is all the code currently allows, it makes sense that they be required to be designed consistent with the existing house. If the Board gets into discussions about detached ADUs at some point in the future, they can consider the need for different types of design parameters; but right now, he is not sure it would be beneficial to bring in the ADB to talk about the attached ADU regulations. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if it would be beneficial to talk about good quality and what needs to be changed to update the outdated codes. She said she was hoping the Board could be more proactive in laying the groundwork for future policy changes. Mr. Chave cautioned against the Board going off on a tangent that does not ultimate relate to any policy choice the City Council wants to make. Again, Board Member Rubenkonig expressed her belief that the current ADU codes are outdated and she would like the Planning Board and ADB to look at the impact of a legal ADU for family members and its criteria. She felt that some things could be better attended to in order to make ADU's more pleasing to the neighborhoods in which they exist. She said she understands Mr. Chave's point of view, but she would rather be more proactive and do some of the homework before being asked to consider potential policy changes. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Cheung did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS There were no Planning Board comments. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:56 p.m. Planning Board Minutes October 23, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 155 9.2.d English, Robert From: Buckshnis, Diane Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 8:48 PM To: English, Robert; Burley, Shannon Cc: Judge, Maureen; Monillas, Adrienne; Williams, Phil Subject: Fwd: DP 80 and 81 Amendment language and amendment language for the the CIP/CFP Good Evening, Here are my placeholders for the Parks and I realize Maureen probably won't be able to add these. I can do it tomorrow if you would like, just let me know - but you will have to add it to the Packet. >> AMENDMENT: to add the Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) back into the Parks Project Fund 125. Rationale: This project will fulfill the Comprehensive Plan PROS plan goals and support Governor's Inslee's $363MM capital budget for salmon recovery. culvert removal, water quality, and water supply projects that will expand and improve salmon habitat. >> Project Name: Edmonds Marsh Estuary (Willow Creek Daylighting) Estimated cost: TBD. >> Project Description: The Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary restoration will restore the natural tidal exchange between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. This project will enhance its many ecological functions and wildlife found within the interior of the Marsh. Funds will be used to support the grant writing efforts. >> Project Benefit/Rationale should read: The natural tidal exchange will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. Conditions that support migratory birds and waterfowl will also be improved. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has a stormwater component which will require removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. The stormwater project will require cleaning out culverts on to improve hydrology and reduce flooding during high flows and engineering as provided by the companion stormwater project known as the Dayton Street Pump Station was also recently completed to assist in flooding on Dayton Street as a result of the Shellebarger Marsh. >> The 2020 Cost Breakdown will be TBD. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --------- >> AMENDMENT to add Edmonds Marsh Restoration into the Fund 126. Rationale: This is a placeholder to allow for freedom of discovery to fulfill PROS plan goals and support Governor's Inslee's $363MM capital budget for salmon recovery. culvert removal, water quality, and water supply projects that will expand and improve salmon habitat. >> CIP Project Description Funds 126 Special Capital/Park Acquisition >> Project Name: Edmonds Marsh Restoration - miscellaneous open Packet Pg. 156 9.2.d >> space/land Estimated Cost: TBD Project Description: Potential >> acquisition of property currently owned by UNOCAL with future control to be WSDOT Project Benefit/Rationale: When this project is completed, it will fulfill needs of citizens for open space as per the PROS plan, promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. >> Project Cost: TBD >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> -------- New Amendment: Add Edmonds Marsh Restoration to Fund 322. >> Estimated >> Rationale: Completes components in goal #1, #3, and #4 of the PROS plan; and more importantly clearly supports Governor Inslee's $363MM capital budget for salmon recovery, culvert removal, water quality and water supply projects that will expand and improve salmon habitat. >> AMENDMENT TO ADD THIS: >> CIP Parks Project Description Fund 332 - Parks Construction Project >> Name: Edmonds Marsh Restoration Estimated Cost TBD (as Marina Beach Park component is at $3-4MM) >> Project Description: The Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary restoration will restore the natural tidal exchange between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. This project will enhance its many ecological functions and wildlife found within the interior of the Marsh. This project will be coordinated with Stormwater. >> Project Benefit/Rationale: The natural tidal exchange will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. Conditions that support migratory birds and waterfowl will also be improved. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has many stormwater components - engineering, removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh, cleaning culverts to improve hydrology and reduce flooding during high flows. Stormwater companion stormwater project known as the Dayton Street Pump Station was also recently completed to assist in flooding on Dayton Street as a result of the Shellebarger Marsh. >> --- ------- --------- -------- ----------------- ------ -----..----- >> For all the funds that have Project Name: Marina Beach Park (125, 126 >> and 322) Estimated Cost $3-4MM AMENDMENT to add more information the Project Description: The Marina Beach Master planning includes daylighting Willow Creek which requires removal of a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's and is the only exchange between the Puget Sound and our Freshwater Edmonds Marsh Estuary (PROS open space and habitat goals). >> Project Benefit/Rationale: Improvements to retain this site as an asset to our regional waterfront park system. The natural tidal exchange from the removal of the 1,600 pipe will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. 2 Packet Pg. 157 9.2.d >> -------------------------------------------------------- .. >> ------- >> For the CFP Stormwater >> AMENDMENT TO Change Project Name: Edmonds Marsh Estuary >> Restoration/Willow Creek Daylighting Estimated Cost: $16.6MM AMENDMENT to add last sentence: You can leave existing language but also add: This project is a component of the PROS plan (comprehensive plan) for open space, habitat and fulfills goals #1, #3 and #4. >> Project Benefit/Rationale: Existing language is fine for a stormwater component except after the statement Edmonds Comprehensive Plan put (PROS plan). >> AMENDMENT to reduce: 2020 Project Cost should be $450K and subsequent years left blank. >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> AMENDMENT: >> On the summary page City of Edmonds, Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Parks, General and Regional Project under the Edmonds Marsh Restoration PLEASE REMOVE SEE CFP STORMWATER and add a purpose: The Edmonds Marsh near - shore estuary restoration will restore the natural tidal exchange between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. This project will enhance its many ecological functions and wildlife found within the interior of the Marsh and is a major component of the PROS plan. The subcomponent Stormwater can be found in CFP Stormwater. >> ------------------- ------------------ >> AMENDMENT: >> On the Summary page of the CFP Stormwater Project For Edmonds Marsh >> Restoration/Willow Creek Daylighting - in purpose please add: This project is a component of the PROS plan Edmonds Marsh for open space, habitat and fulfills goals #1, #3 and #4. >> Please reduce amount to $450K >> --------------------------------------- >> Call me if you are confused. It would be easier if you look at the pages for the and how they are sent up. In the CFP. Packet Pg. 158 9.2.e CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM U~� 2020-2025 DRAFT 501 ►M Packet Pg. 159 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q Packet Pg. 160 9.2.e CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2020-2025) Table of Contents GENERAL Building Maintenance Public Works 7 112 Transportation Public Works 9 125 Capital Projects Fund Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 12 126 Special Capital / Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 14 332 Parks Construction (Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 15 421 Water Projects Public Works 17 422 Storm Projects Public Works 18 423 Sewer Projects Public Works 20 423.76 Waste Water Treatment Plant Public Works 21 PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Capital Parks & Recreation/ 125 Projects Fund Public Works 25 Special Capital / Parks & Recreation/ 126 Parks Acquisition Public Works 49 Parks Construction 332 Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 57 Wastewater 423.76 Treatment Public Works 67 Packet Pg. 161 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q Packet Pg. 162 9.2.e Cip GENERAL E c� 0 a. 0 L Q .Q m Ln N O N O N O N C R C R a m r u m a_ �a .Q c� u a� 0 0- 0 L U- NaN LJ r a Packet Pg. 163 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q Packet Pg. 164 9.2.e LO N O N O O N _O N U 0 0 a E R O a` N C N E O CL E Q R 0 Lf) 7 V Ln LI) It V N N V O N o O V 0 Ln V O N O V O Ln eD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eD 0 0 e3e30 0 0 0 0 0 e30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e3 -IT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o V 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 V V m N V O N 0 V 0 m 0 o V 0 0 m e3 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O n Ln O 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N p L O O Es3M O O Un 0 O O u)m 1 n N NM O O ON O O O u)N O 0 0 N Ln 1 n 1 n Nun 0 0 ) Co O Ln O MDNM O O O O LnC 7 V O O NLn O M NN O> 0 NEANN 0 0 1 n f O O V 1 n M EAn O 1 n V N 7 EAr O 7 1 n O EA V 0 F N H3 N O Hi r 0 V Hi EA 6s n U3 Qq O Lfl eq M eq 64 eq eq fH eq E9 Co EA H3 Q9 eD Hi eD fH H3 r H3 EA e3 r Hi e3 eD fH eD eD eD eD eD eD fH H3 H3 H3 Q9 O N � � Ln O O O O O 0 N O O LLn N U3 EFJ 0 0 N 0 O N 0 N O O O 0 N EA 0 0 DO O N N O 0 O N LO � L H3 000 0 0 000 0 0 N 00 Ln Lon Lon H3 - EA O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 cccc000_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O C)O 000 O 0 O 0 L n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N L n O L O N 0 0 fAM UnO��N u) N Ln Ln N 7 N H3 N N EiJ EiJ r N EA fA H3 Ce) Eli 6s Q9 d3 H3 H3 H3 H3 ± 7 7 Lf) m 7 7 Ln Ln 7 7 Ln Ln 7 7 Ln Ln 7 Ln 7 Ln V Ln 7 m m m m V m 0000000 0000000 00 00 00000 0000000000 0000 0 O 000 coo O1 R 000000n 000 W!l Lnw Lno 000 0 00000 oo0o0000000o N -OO M M O o a0 too 'It LnM 0 V 000 V Ln0 r N N EA N N EA EA N EA EA N EA H3n M H) O H) M N EA EA N EA N�� EA T N N EA EA N EA EA H3 N fA fA eD r- fF) eD EA e3N 64 HeD NMEET W 0. U. U U a) a) U Ld - W o U N W E C O y O U E w d 3 m y U a) to m a 0 C - 0 O a) > - m Ld U y Ld C '0 a) E C C> C M O N a) Y N 3 N a C a N y C E Co U 0 Q. N U 7 N�Om �i Y CL -m 0`c -- -0 O 02 a) U S E ClLL N C - .tU 0) O N - C �� a N CL C =_ y N N a) y O 0 i-a C U '3 U L -Q N N C N U LC `) O W ^� C N O -U• r3+ Ll 0 0 a) 0 V CtsN -O 2 NUU •fp '0_ E- LC O U O Co a) aa) "O X 7 N C W Q N ttl E��t2ocm��u C Q Vi 0 a)cl- Z C U Co d C 0'vcU`W Q= C C __ a) od�ac� N N 0 0 LCM n Cr- U W�aa`�3�a;�>V N m O r d C a) 0 0 Z a) > m > C- a- LC N C a7 O Y U d O m N i a) "O C_iS - _Y U- C Na U d O E N N U d U C U O_ ¢ otS a) LL - LC C 3 7 O F, N F. V Oi 7 L,L)- LC U a ""' to C O O i LC U O U (a 7 N N a) a) C to •- .� C U N"' N N a) O C U •C N LO i. (d N LL I.L a) to N L0 W > YOLL W U N O -O a O"O :n C r-LU LC W �C7 cl�_) c i v o aa)) o f o.YC7 c�ia� $ W o� om'� Q yr n o L�sI N o !n U- tn, E a o c 3 V a) Mtn c -O L C c= d -O 7 fC W U S U C N r+ Ll U 2 ll C E :C LML y S U U Cn N y a N 3� a7 N W N U O Q 0= O U 7 N U E a) 7_ O Q- 7 U> a) d S S S Y LC i C N N U 7 N» Q Q U U Q Y i N.8 N l7 O S S r LC Cn C f0 S N !q O== E 3 N m- a N¢ �-. 3 S U Q �j i O N N O IL QSm W Md C C 7dmai W Ud UUmd� W 22ll LC lldJd}UULLSQ Ud�UUUZ2dJ�U2UJlld2dd2d m L O) O aL E N O C0. G .Q m 0 N O N O N O N C m C m IL d m U. m CL m U N N O Q. O L a H U. A u a_ U a Packet Pg. 165 vy VI 61) ull \ a 04 coo qqq coo 2 ��000 CD CD k� Co �J m §/ }� CD )£CD IC■ </ 7 \mm \{)_ƒ/ §(\\ \§§7\� §LL LL °kk(� oeao� C «(DCrCr k/AID °§k§-0o(D =ƒ �)�§�i)�§ =®=(D §)\\l±LLfU) e=«)a« > > U) ,C\\:r<=aCd 3§ Cr ull k Cli Packet Pg. 166 9.2.e H �o�o 000�oo O O O o 0 0 0 O 00 M(D 0h (000 O 1� N N O (D 0 00 O O N - 0 Co 7 M V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 O O O O O O O O (O n 0) O N Lo En V3 V3 Y N N N U U a) N N N U U O O O O D O O O O � (O fD r- O M O O O O O O 2 n V3 fA Co d3 7 d3 c c c c O O O O m m m m O O O O O O O O O O > > > > C C C C C C O O O O �� O 000))N O Lorr O O� - CMb h CD d3 V3N d3 V3 V3 (a m m m V) N N N N fa i0 i0 D o0 C ornmmm p 0) 0) 0) 0) o (c 0 N 2 2 C C 2 2 C C Co N N N N U U C c U U c c O p O O 'Y 'y 'y ' y O 00 0 0 0 0 U U U U Lo 60 U a) m m a) a) m m O O O O O 0 00 N CD Vi m w(Lo N� MD m V 't N 000 m EH V3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X c E m N � C C Cz m E v, N O N QN E E N .N..N..N. c c c c N > N o m m m m O. v y �p E ya)a)amOEE ECl 5 01 Cl > > > N cU9 2222 E�oaa))2 m E �i o C Cl E E Cl Cl E E m > o C> 5 E C E E > O c O' N C E C o m O 4 :.:.:O O . E m 0— o L i V O O O m- C 5 c O E (n m m e c° a) E2 a) a) E2� > c Q O m y O is i m (D (D CD m m O> >- N C C C C 00 N Co C C mm(n in >, m— r !-' � � � d C 0 3L ,Cf) rr N.t InJ Co Co � m� > ¢ dLoN0 O 45 Q �E 11 N7 NNN L .2@)L Om nCh(@@�! �NN0J 0)0)000 N QN O� Onl (n c N Nr 21M CDMr(n(n(n 0 0 000000000 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O f� 0 0 o�ssVaooOmOo0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 N O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O s O LL9 OQ) lf)O(D W OIf)LL9 QlOM OOI10(2 lf)I�n W MM nONONOOOO MQl W (D 0100 C Cli N - MV30) r -7 C` l N -6a EH 63 CD 6363N (D Co LLD V3 63 00 N(f) V3_ N<D r 6'3 V3 V3 63 63 V3 63 V3 63 63 63 V3 00000 C LoN 000 C C OM C 0 0 O C Lo O O C h N T EH-7 N 63 6F3 V3 V3 63 O O C C N (D O Co 000 O O 000 666 f, 0 o � 0000 0000 C C M O M O C C m O Q l O 00 00 C C O h 0 7 O 000 C (O Co O 00 C O( O( O C f) D aO NN � 63 63 MN 63 63 Cc N ; 63 (n0 Vi V3 71-I 63 f N� V3 fA V3 V3 O O O O O O O O O O O (f) O O O r, O O 00 o 0 n (D O 000000 O 0 O O O O 0 7 O O O O 0 0 O O m EA Vi 63 63 63 63 63 63 6o - 63 V3 0 f� I� o C W m N N LLD 60 M 0) V3 Q V3 o o m rn CoCli Lo O000 N w (Al Co 60 N 7 �2 N V) V3 60 VT X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ai Q 'o N C M p E c a) O C' O E � > m N p > > Y C (n O N in > L333 3 T 3m> ° L oa m(n cn (n m j Y 3Q c0 Y O 3 o<n N c c O m y�$U)(nU)EL< a C\j U O w V N w L (D O 0 N V In � V) CD 0(D C' O �� CNNNON _>. a) > >0, > V1� N O Q 2 mO > N O N C V) O O N O O O O L = =-2 L (n c o 2 d CA ^ U y L O L T c mQ C� V1 (n V1 dfn V1 07 �.0 O(n� N O > >>j EL O(A iA(A inQ . �oQ v,� � E Ez o oQ 2 2 O'pL `0 mm LL cNao(o LL a) > > T ma[ cc' m >�¢� a) O 2 T� a E E E N N N^ O L Y C N Q O L a m> O 3 E YOoEEEEoM(omom'C�rYYQ CAC ro m o 0 0 o E E E (u� L L N 3 O O�� O� �� _ r J m V13: > (n �� U)�; fn(n (na>. cad N Quin > > > >tn� intnina oin�� o°)�x O a O O C 0 0 N c N(D L.L. .L. 8YW m m(c m E m�Y o 3 Y fn N N CD 000 N 000N�� N N C8,5)M _ W 00)=(n 02 U)M Packet Pg. 167 9.2.e R tbi Nt N 6-1 co b N 6-1 co W) N Cl) It 6-1 to Lq n V W m N N a r co M co O to W b M M f9 M co N e a N N C/ (9 0 W b Go oll 0 O N 0 N N V3 O C N o0 N O O W M 7 cm 0 N co EA O C O O C C N m O co N N 6F) O C O O C C O r 00 Io0 't N EA f!t dt O O O O O O 000 cm cm N N I d o 0 O 0 O O O CII O O 0 O N O O CM 4a O O N W O O N O O co to 4a a N n fA 0 C 0 C 0 C 6 O 6 6 O O o m O O) o O N N co 6a n Oj fR LO EH (Al 6a EA (DD W dt EA m 61i � N O O O LO N O 00 C LO 1-O O C 0 00 00 C C LO eD rn 0000000 (O '" I <D O O C C o 00 2 O O O O O o Po O LO fG 0000 0000 C C m o MO C C o o W O� N 6a 0 V3 1 EA V 00 dt 'I EA r fR cm 6a V3 co EA 6a dt V3 M N O N O O 080 OO C O o In LOno N61t Ki O O Ui P� 60 00000000 00000000 C C 0 o 00NN0NI�I� oo M � 6f1 C C N o — — 6'9 dt C C 0 o h o Vf Eft O O 0 07 EA O O O LO EH N C-i N O C LO LO co O N O N a 0 N E N N W a U. U c E U w ui ca c � y > a r E E « y 3 U > £ > £ E y c E m N E�£>> - N C C a> « y L L L E 'C E N d UNUEOEU>l6NNN0 w C N 0= O 0 0 0 W 0 y pN C a 01 Q yO L O 0 L L L L N ca 07 y a s 0) a a 0 m C 3 3 may, U 5 0) N E o E E E o 0 o .0 L rn T>> 5� d= = 3 E 2 O O O O L .- 85 `5x L2om3U)i 33m�mCO3 LO2in (V y 0 y T EO l0 W C N Q ' CO, 3 M y Y 5�c c E Y d N Q ppW pN' L a L > >a 11 LO o d C] la U) > L> T N >y N >y �>>> > C-i @i Cl_ m UUU' Q d J y CD L (n L > v Q O v v O O U N "O (n > L Q > > Q Q > U7 Q L C N V O O C7 C Q dN� Nx �� U7 (n U7 (n N N M N OOOWIN O a 10 Packet Pg. 168 9.2.e 0 0 a rn O O O 0000 0 C (n r O C7�2 t»6n1V 0 0 0 0 0 0 Or- Ovao0 6a606a606a O O 0 C r (D 7O tnt»int»- 0 0 0 0 0 0 L6 W O O O 0 W OO't M� 0 0 0 <D ao 00000 00000 C C 000(3) O�OM 0 0 O o 0 0 ON On 6a60 C C C tnt» U) to Q' a M O C O CL E _ N E p O C. L ?� $ E E N c � w a M CO > L O M N m r a O C 0 LL a N Q N L YO YO 0 H C Q) O M O N C V o m ;isD'o£EY Co N "O Q _ D > E E p r� N O N j>> O O Q .N- E E o o° Cl E m o D E O— E E f m Y 3 .t y o D (TO Y m T >mm m (TO m> Y m C Q Co > 3 L N E dY m 0 r J a) N Oi 003��%o 0) �L?� 0 n3ia oo 3: o 0 a tO E m ¢ 3 aC �N W � mQU7�2(nLL to to Co (D a rn Co aD a v M - to to O D�1 � N of o) rl a co (o rn a W to to 11 Packet Pg. 169 9.2.e l(1 N O N O N O N O N V d O IL E � a 7 O LL IL y y � O N £ a N O C. c 10 E U Q a R � U Li O O O O N 00 O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O o 0E13, Q1 000000310 O EAm 00064 EA EA Hi 619.0 EA N O O O O O O O O O O O a D 0 0 0 O f0 N 001f1 (A O 1f) O cM N IA I� 64 00 W 00 000 7 O0 Lo IA r- EA EA N Efl Efl EA 64 EA Efl CUl Efl Efl co Efl EA 6p, H N � O N LO 0 O O N 00 O lA V3 O lA V3 N O � N a 0 00 Sri E9 0 Ld 6s 0 0 00 0 0 o iri N V3 0 0 LO N� N O 64 N ('7 N 0 O In to 06q00 O In H3 O Ln fA o O N 0 O In fH O N N6s6s 00 0 0 0 0 iA 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 � N O 63 N ely ta 0 0 u) 061�(a 0 v 0 0 u 6a 00 O O ui O N 61� 6s 64 N O N v3 O O O O O M OD O O O O 0 6S O C 0 N v � 0 � W LO 0 69 LO 69 N O 6s "O N 6s a o 0 00 0 G 00 to o O O o O 0 O 00 N 00 00 00 oco .0 O .- N N W IL XX X V v� c L >. co a) O y U - C' CD 3 o CO v 3 c � N O U W " O O C C y c o y 0 E a) E 0 J C o o c C o w U o y a) -0 C'3 . a) CD Cc aa)i Y c y o m o E ca y m E o` a0 o E 3 Y v y m LLI°' a E o m o a c > a°> > E v Cl o Oca 9 0 0 0 E o w w E �a L E a 5 E E o m 2 : m o f Q E m "O O E `1 a5 y m CD0 N Y E Q Y o m �1 y a5 y C Z o ac m° m E a m °C O d ri c a E a[ a > CO o w o U yU E a`;� m �� m m ma 3�Cnaa o W c ai-0v oo a) Y.!o W00m0 a oNE m L , >as c, a Qc w -0 a Ec a > NN�.> c rU p mU U U W W U 2i 2P 2P 2 a 0565 > v U W U>= 0¢ 12 Packet Pg. 170 9.2.e a N 01 (D {D Co a O O 0 aD O O O O O O w O O O 1l1 O O 0 a N m (V V7 0/ N n M O O O O O O O L (D Cl) � O 69 O O C C CD O C) U) m V! V! N D 0) lD lD L6 N N lD R O 6N ai 69 r �D 7 N 7 r uS O O � N Ef! O a Cl) N N 69 N Co M fD N 0) Co Oa O 69 Co Co a> 69 a C6 N O E9 7 O 01 Cl) VJ 0 R 06 n Cl) 69 LL a_ U N t k W d E L V a 13 Packet Pg. 171 9.2.e N a N 7 _ N 7 7 N N 7 M H N EA (A (A O N � O� O lcCC O SO 61) 61) N LO N Cl) O N N O p N N O N O N N N '0 O N N O N c E» Efl e3 N a 0 Co O a y lc 'I W O1rl E;E e3�� N N W IL LL fU C O 2 Cr E a R i 01 Y 0 IL a y as m a CL E U mV > V W c a O °> m c Q CL y Z O CD F U L) r W Q) Q) v -3 U)U) Q Co U Li a oo 0 01 W O Ir O n n O n f9 Co C O O N N r" W i9 N q to f0 O v Cl) m is n N 0. E c r T Cli C O CD O O N i9 O C O N 60. O O 0 O O 0 0 N61) Cl) M n N O 0. 10 7 m 0 0 0 0 O PR EA^ W 0 ��0�0 0 0 0 0 00000 d Offs a EA W N 0 N 0�0 12 O W N Pia (A 7 e3 64 Efl O C O 0 O M 69 O 0 O NKJ O 0 O M O 0 O N O O O Co O O O NK7 0 O 0 M 0 O 0 N69 EA O 0 Cl) 69 C0 0 0 N 61) � O r- OO64OOW W r- a64 O f- O W O O O 0 O 0 M C\l Efl 1* 64 Efl 63 rn rn Co O O co 0) N (D OO om o W N 1� r un W m m a 0000 0000 Wv r�ornM, 0000 LOCO WO LO e3 ar�rrw fA 7N! ea v3 Nr 69 ER O N Co ea 0000 N101,7 GO ea fA ea X X X U N _N � N .N U > lq o N oz d U !a y � Q O L C jN L 0 C O 0, O) 0 O) W O O OL NE 2 N N a O oL c ° oCr > Coa` a C,j a j t (n C6 o f cCoU<a•-m@JU•mc2a) c - o� m o od m'N c a>(aEo� o �� a �YmEo 3a �o m ao �� c m U 3�U N m- 'f6 m—mCCO0-7; � "O � y UE N C a N�� a(n R.-UP C �fa tti C N O 0.- C CL.. aiYdLL OOL.. W OD o �Y zL� 2 U' N-0 - E O i Co 0 D Q W 2 d N W N N H H U r (} d H Q m I-- O N V Lr W Co N r- a Cl) � O to O to O 0 O N i9 O C O N 0 O 0 W) O 0 0 N N CoLq r-- i3 N 0 a N O 7 a 0 W Cl) M M_ N ro Lo N N C M N a LO w N N m N K3 a W C W N C r a 14 Packet Pg. 172 9.2.e R O a N D E d O Q E Q co U LO CIA N C7 N O N O N a) O a 0 U i in C 0 U N i a M a LL _0000000000000000 Q9 0 ��0 fR fAOfA fA E9 (!'1 N O 0 (G LQ O 0 N O O O N M CO N O LO (O O LO O r O F NG4 cr " K3 eg. 09. Vi, 64 N 613 6H O N Ln N O N N O N O O O M N LO CV O N E9 O O O O N LO CD o cm `Q N 0 0 C O 0 o 0 0 (n cm N 64 O N O O O O I n C O C O O N P CoNL O O M M�� M 6A N E9 H) O O O 613uOj O O CD O O O O fJ3fn (0 O 0 7 cm CD (O LO N W � � 69 O) O N a x x X X U c m t O c ca — cz 0 0 (D C t5 T m c w N d U L U 3 U) c a) a 3 O = C L C w 6 p w cow co -0 0 0 o "O LL:d C3 C C a) C Q O O O rn a) 0 CC 0 ya)a)0 > 3 U }L ' p a)EEQU E O O a) oNa) C C O �m 2.0 LU C 0N a) a) YNYN_ o CYa)a) Q mN Of O a L Q y 0 LU H ao NE N (6 L V O U S NSS��:-_ Y C CO CO fU6 Co N Wa a)a) CZ OC ' -p CmD ( o O oa) c 0 a vUUv��v�m a0U»w U). O 61) O 69 O O O N 69 O O O n 0 O LO n 69 N_ O rn 61) O O Cl) 61) LO N N O N Cl) N O N N N O N N O N O O O O O O (0 0 0 0 O Cl 0 O O Cl 0 O O Cl O ( 0 0(.4 M O O 000000 M LO N O 1 n l O 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 N O � r � E9� eq N 64 64 O 69 O 69 609 609 vy O M M M OD (Al 15 Packet Pg. 173 9.2.e LO N O N N O N O O O Cl) LO N N O N fR O O O O NCli O LO N �� O 0 O 0 0 0 O uo LO C\j N 6 O N O N O O 6, 61, O O O O O O LO to N N ff> 49. O O O O O O LO to i. n 60� v> r Q w 0 O N a a W _A C 4 a •2Co m a v U 0 C N m f y y a 16 Packet Pg. 174 9.2.e LO N O N R N O N LO N m O N N O O N N O N O N N O N N O N O N O N a G N O R O N N W a LL Q tm O a` y N C (D N O E a` > `y W O a a E Z F (4 W C 0 U Li a O n 0000000 W n n OD 0000 O O V O O d3 Vf?0 O l n 000 O O M 0 CD (n n" N 06c?0 n O fA 0 O V Co u7 C)000N (Dr N n (D O 0 (0 ComItIt(n fR LQ fA o0 nM r 00 al O r It LO d3 m (D CoCo(D Vil FRS N MM'i lqifH fH ER ER ER ER d3 d3 d3 0, N (`M 7 (D (D 7 LO M fA n n M M O p N N LO Ln LO M 69. 03 N OODD n r p p m COLO CD LO n d3 69. fA N vm V (G (OD Co C,i 6'3 LO C It O rn M m � N d 00 7 C, C) O- Oln O V OO O n O O ((D OODD Co (D N d3 u7 It I f/i V fi? M fA FR � H3 d3 d3 In al COn M O O � nrn nnnn n r N W nN r N W (nO 0 0 W V (D O Ocl N 00(C)n (DO u2 N 7 O n H3 O D M co,, r d3 M M N r N d3 d3 � fA fA H3 ' d3 ER r fg X 11 X X N N V) C C N CD E E a' Y 00 N N 0 000000 �� >2� 0-1 9O E E c (a) >p Co Co p p O p p O O p p O O p O H .0 C Cu U Co a a a a a a a a a O a C d y C E E E a �mW E E EEOaOaOa)o c c 0 0 ai w U ai y U ai ai U U aEi aEi U U aEi U 4) E y E � aam—m------- a 03 a 03 03 03 03 03 03 4 U) 2 •.• •.• iN>ir (.i JO'a`ia`i>o[>o[o[o[iririr�, (n ��EE0 ;mom Y¢N` o L 0 0 cl0(a(a(a(a(a(am 0 7 0 7 7 7 7 7 7Cc CZ N N 5 L Q ir irf a� 0 O a� N M l n m I n O Q^ ; N F Fa Z U YO a) 7 7 O N O N N N N N N N a> Q N 3 T C C r Co N Co Co Co Co Co Co a) C Cl i;; �. (n0¢¢NaNaaaaaaii U)CLr, 0 n O C n (D M OM On 7 fA d? R L' L' Cl) Cl) N N 61) ffl N � N N W M M N N LO � LO n n N N V1 � fR f9 0 OER 0 T W O O T T Co Cq n � Cl) 0 0 n n Cl) Cl) f9 f9 T 6% T (7Cl (D (D W W N N fit fit Cl) O O Cl) N O N r ri Cl) o (o m 61) n C R R fA f9 (D O (D T fA T M Cl) O O C C Cl) Cl) fif fii O (p w ai Uf E V y r N 0 E m a o vr� E m :° E F H 0 H LL LPL a_ U N Z k LLJ d L V a 17 Packet Pg. 175 9.2.e LO N O N R N O N N Cl) O N N O O N N O N _O N a) N O N N O N O N O N C R 0 a N c d E o E W Q o z N F _ N04 U LU c O U ii a C� 0 0 0 l2 O d3 (�D fa 0 O 0 O fA 0 O 0 O 0 O n ao Y3 O 0 O O lA If) C4 n H3 Co aD Co6 ao 0 m 0 Z N Co d a C O C E a`) .2" W 30 Q O V a) O (�0 m w LL w E LL o m a )Y N y7 Y U Co {00 a) O C a) a 0CL E� LL 0 a) E a a0 a` )) O coycgdcq �m c a in a O O O O O O o m w fA O O O N O O 0 0 O n 7 n V A Cl C0 O T O O g r Nl 0 n D) O o l0 Co M m O m N O Cl) r r N N fa fA 6% fA 6% fA 6% O W N O O n D) o It O n n M r 64 K3 v3 0 O T N w 7 O n rn � CoM CoM r 6% 64 0 CD O O (* V 7 n fA N N <D Mo F» 0 0 0 O O O O N Co CD N M -1 En O O O 0 O O n Efl O O l0 M r fA U3 O O O N O D) 64 a W Co Co v r o N CA nWLO N Co Co fl3 O r N M 7 in (O N O N N O O N N O O N N O O y a) N U a) N N U a) N N U a) N N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O C C C C C C C a N C U E E E E E E E (D a) a) a) a) a) a) a) E° m m m m d a a a a a a a a E E E E E E E cc U O O O O O O O O o) Coa w U) m (n U) a m a) U) a m CD (n a m O a m r N M V l0 Co n >. Y al a3 a1 a3 aS Cu a) (UJdddddad castststs Co a C a) N E U m C6 a) t CO CO a m N O E a o R U O r H LL a_ U N r t x LU V a 18 Packet Pg. 176 9.2.e ta 0 CD N O N OCD F N O N LO N O N CD N O N O N Cl) O N N O O N N O N w O N � a) N O O N CD 0 N O N ON O N O N 0 of O O rn E LO Lf o. N N W 0 CL d U) O p N a) E a) O CL 0 Co p N r C a1 N = N C O j E C cd f0/1 Q (n a1 j C E— � a 0 E o p O Co O In 64Cm o Ln _ N a1 N NLO O F N O N LO O N R N O N O N N N N O r Cl) V! N N rl LO 4 N N r ar O N K3 a °r 0 y C C M It a; C\j o Lo Lo 6% ._ N N W LL x x x U W O O O c a7 0 O-CL U L N_ E O L a p N O C (n C (D E N C E C, >O O Cu a a a a [Cm T T Y a) w m = Cz C C LL LL p a7 O O o O 3 --• w C C N = 2 Y d oar 02 as N CD- a O U) N N C z C N 4 y0 a) C) > p S p 0 fA (n vy ON M CD O 4& 7 C m a) a N a) N 0 0 Lq _ N W al N 7 O N F N tFJ O N LO N O N R N O N O M co O cD Lo N O M co O u7 64 0 rn n N � O N y3 O N O N a 0 9.2.e N N O N N O N N N O N N O N O N O N IL 0 N O m o E N N W a LL L) pm IL O d i C.) a y N Co C N O aa) E a aEi O W Ca U y N aCl Z CC E E F M U 'Co R w o L) 3 a C 0 0 0 0'e 0) W'D I- O w g M 6130 OEA rh moo mrI MOO 00 M7(O N N Op O N(O 00 NMaNM'tC Co O M T n U9, N- N N NU9, N 63 646a b4 ER 6S 6A 6a Co n (M m r O 't M w N O M LLO N e9 ER E9 O O 0 Cor O Co O Lf) to EiJ fH H3 0 O N h O) N W) V) O LO Co O Co m U) �3 Co LOn un 0 N (O 0 N Co0(MM Co r fA 64 fA O Co 0 V � n M (o m (D Cm (0 r fA H3 ;; O O n O 0 Co M fl N O O n M Co CD Co LOf) A eD CO M a O rn m0 0) V O W V a (m V In W w e9� eD N H3 x O O C N M e u7 to N N N N 00000000 N N N N N N N N N N N v a) N C N a) C C N C C a) C C N m C a) N E N a) E E N E E E E E ow o w N N N N>>>> N O O O O O anan� O O O O oa$aaE E E Er E E E E a a 25 a c0 (C c0 (C c c -C a) t t a) a) t a) a) CC N a) CC CC N am '+ CC Ya aaaCA to c C C C m CC ¢ CC 0 O Cr Cr o[ Er a) m N N N N CC CC >Cz 3333mmmma`�a`> 0 3 a) a� a) a�mMmM 3 3 Y O- fnMfnM- �O (C CO (C (n CO 0 D m D m c c c c a a a) 72 >¢¢¢¢ O r N M U U ¢ M On CO On - - - - a) m � (�(noaaaaaaaaUU (Ctttttttt.- O � � O O O R O ENA � CoLO a LO 69 Co O C Co m O O Cn T N N Y! Ef7 Co Vk W CA On 00) CO) � � n 0 00 ER f- N N O O n 69. 64 N O N 00 vk 00 a R Co Co a R N N fH ER V EOA -T N N M OM V Co N N m EA N CD N � V w OD LO V3 0 O7 M n � N N C m E N N O O -0 d ((i U) ! c o a` d .0aC xsLL 3 a) - w O C1 v)'Z5r3 U) N C O U N C N a) c a) a) C-tf i C y y Q C xso== C E- O E d yY U E m a mm m o �2 'd 2 U) a) a) IL o CC a` Y� C j :° E o :° m C F CC O O H H H LL a_ U N Z x LLJ d E t V a 20 Packet Pg. 178 9.2.e C M i 01 O a y C E N O Q fC Q R U 6n,o _ N N M N H N N � N � O O O O 00 O to 00 O d> to Oo oa CMO O O Co O �� CD 0) N O O O O O O O N O O O 01 00 0v c U') � �� CmH LO N Cl) O N N O O N N O N O N V Cm a) N O O N a N O N O N O N a v c °' ant N y � rn 01 l0 7 Un O "It 6 N N W a LL U y E) N N 0 U 0 = c C p Co U � N N �- W U U Q O O d Z as 0 c a) F O O U W > > aa)i =U O 7�; OC oouli a U U D 00 O Un O T O V O Co nn am W n N n N O r Mo i9 fR N N O Un d> 0) a of f0 N f0 Un n N M M CO CD rnn N N �o 40 fR O O to N 60. O N N i9 69 Co H LL a_ U N r t x W d E L V a 21 Packet Pg. 179 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q 22 Packet Pg. 180 9.2.e E CIPO w E O L Q PARKS U Lo N O N PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS N O N C R C m d N d r R .Q R U O O Q O L .r Q 23 Packet Pg. 181 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q 24 Packet Pg. 182 9.2.e CIP PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FUND 125 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 25 Packet Pg. 183 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q 26 Packet Pg. 184 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, outdoor plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 a 27 Packet Pg. 185 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Flower Pole Replacement I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $120,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed throughout City. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed throughout City. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Construction $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 TOTAL $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 r Q 28 Packet Pg. 186 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000 Improvements / Misc Small Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway entrances into the city and 4t" Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities and streetscape improvements in public areas. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering / Administration Construction $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 r Q 29 Packet Pg. 187 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $25,000 Playground Partnerships PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create additional facilities. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $25000 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 1 $25000 $0 $0 a 30 Packet Pg. 188 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 Field/Court/Stage 700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities and children's play equipment. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Professional services Engineering & Administration Construction $5,000 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. LL a 0 a v N x w E U 2 a 31 Packet Pg. 189 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 Improvements South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom upgrades. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park, regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $5,000 $5000 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000 $5000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts w a rr 0 a v N x w a� E U 2 a 32 Packet Pg. 190 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: City Park. Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts r Q 33 Packet Pg. 191 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $13,100,000 IMM M91 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic Park master plan is complete and has been adopted, funds (including carryover, grants, bonds, REET, Park Impact Fee's and General Fund) have been allocated and we are prepared to go to bid in February with ground breaking in April or May of 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds have been set aside, and grant funds secured. With the approved bonding we are ready to begin the project. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning and $395,000 Design Engineering $140,000 Construction $11,937,092 1 % Art $88,000 TOTAL 12,560,092 r Q 34 Packet Pg. 192 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms I ESTIMATED COST: $30,000 LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Capital improvements maintain this asset as needed. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 r Q all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 35 Packet Pg. 193 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Community Garden I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $72,000 PRIVATE LIVING AREA FORMS. JOHNSON m PRf VACY FENCE h s ,lr 3 I �N z z a w z W a o w V � m I � y O ❑ b z o COMP ~20 ��- ip b ¢ Y 0 ¢ a ACCESS ROAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Funds allocated to support the purchase and sale agreement for a 1-acre parcel of land near Yost Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: in the community. The community garden has been a long-standing interest SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Professional Services Lease Terms $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 TOTAL $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 $0 $0 r a 36 Packet Pg. 194 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $5,000 Improvements 89t" Place West and 197t" Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County 12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and natural trail system to Maplewood Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $5000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $5000 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Q 37 Packet Pg. 195 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $3-4M Improvements .r eunx y rwuys o.rtw rr.tirsme � .wd+ wemr � � renw �i South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with federal transportation funds. WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; Protected through Deed -of -Right RCW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redefine the park to better serve the community as it accommodates the new alignment of Willow Creek. The project will include parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, potential concession areas, restrooms, upgraded play area, upgraded benches and picnic tables and BBQ's, Improved ADA accessibility, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges connecting the park across Willow Creek, personal watercraft staging and launching area, bicycle racks, fencing, and retaining the existing beach/ driftwood area and off leash area. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Marina Beach Park is a highly used and beloved public open space in the City. Through the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Action Plan and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan the community identified the need to restore the adjacent Edmonds Marsh, re-established for salmon habitat. After careful review and the completion of a feasibility study, the preferred method to accomplish this is to daylight Willow Creek from Edmonds Marsh into the Puget Sound, through Marina Beach Park. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study $30,000 $250,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction (REET) $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Construction 332 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $250,000 $250,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. LL Q o: 0 a_ U N x w c as E r Q 38 Packet Pg. 196 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 781h Place W. & 241" St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 1 $5,000 1 $0 $0 1 $5,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts LL a rr 0 a v N x w a� E U 2 a 39 Packet Pg. 197 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 Improvements 83`d Avenue West and 204" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County 22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street connecting to Yost Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional trail connections. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 1 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. r Q 40 Packet Pg. 198 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 Improvements 80" Ave W and 186t' St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County 6.93-acre neighborhood park; zoned entirely Park. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Trail improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, athletic field, tennis court and restroom maintenance. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Stud Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. r a 41 Packet Pg. 199 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,805,198 sruvs: -- __.__.__ ....— -- �78ptM� �i►,:p, Brsh `, l Aw R— _ T i Prr�ppsed Edmards Waterfront center II •-:, ,Kxr i� ara+ nwr ss.acc .o.wrrr err w rx M�ryr�kOrldr� �.. r — wpo-.e rarq K+r+� rrra,wcn ara �----•- re+.a k,w¢',n�va, n Raw M1opw�tl �Imn Owe Yw ♦or�.�yrro�.r.. anM vueew..�e r.n p.r.r� n r+sRfr�,-Owf yF." PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot, and frontage improvements. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. This project includes the Cit 's support for the parking lot and frontage improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center. One of the top priorities in the PROS Ian is too en up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering $67,500 Construction $2,588,645 1 % for Art $24,920 TOTAL $2,681,065 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 42 Packet Pg. 200 9.2.e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Final design and construction of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor. Starting from 2009 public process and concept design, develop site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", installed to draw attention and interest to the corridor and enhance the visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The Cultural Heritage Walking Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park Service Preserve America grant program, was implemented in 2011-2014 with 8 artist made historic plaques on 4th Avenue. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the recently established goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District application. Design completion will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project implementation phase. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 $250,000 Engineering & Administration Construction $500,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $100,000 $750,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts E c� L 0 L a. E i 0 L Q E r .Q M V Ln N O N O N O N C R C 0 a 0 2 U M U- a U a� 0 0- 0 L a w 0 6M N x w r c a� E U M r a 43 Packet Pg. 201 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $180,000 Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Chlorine injector, pool cover, fiberglass drain covers, boiler maintenance and anticipated and unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion control. ADA improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $75,000 $25,000 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $25,000 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Q 44 Packet Pg. 202 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within the park system. Zones scheduled for Mathay Ballinger Park and Civic Park. Supported by grant from Verdant. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Professional Services Construction $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 r a 45 Packet Pg. 203 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,250,000 Completion — Ebb Tide r�r AV idi- s i`� R:. i - -•i. '1. ISO AIL PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 Engineering Construction $150,000 $1,000,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $250,000 $1,000,000 x all or part of this Project may quality for 1 % for the Arts LL a o: 0 a_ U N t x w r c m E r r Q 46 Packet Pg. 204 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000 Trail / Bike Path Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with engineering funding. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 * all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Q 47 Packet Pg. 205 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ T .r Q 48 Packet Pg. 206 9.2.e CIP PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FUND 126 - SPECIAL CAPITAL / PARKS ACQUISITION 49 Packet Pg. 207 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ T .r Q 50 Packet Pg. 208 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $988,118 Capital Projects and Acquisitions _1 r-A r _ A ? .1 .=-rr�,r- �r A _f-loll LLL41,'. i�.,^•u..�l i�fi' x`•; . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on: Marina Beach / Library Roof: $80,830 PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $54,300 Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $26,850 PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art Principal & Interest $163,120 $165,820 $167,250 $170,080 $167,710 TOTAL $163,120 $165,820 $167,250 $170,080 $167,710 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 51 Packet Pg. 209 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $13,100,000 IMM M91 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic Park master plan is complete and has been adopted, funds (including carryover, grants, bonds, REET, Park Impact Fee's and General Fund) have been allocated and we are prepared to go to bid in February with ground breaking in April or May of 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds have been set aside, and grant funds secured. With the approved bonding we are ready to begin the project. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning and $395,000 Design Engineering $140,000 Construction $11,937,092 1 % Art $88,000 TOTAL 12,560,092 r Q 52 Packet Pg. 210 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,100,000 Space / Land PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open space. SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Land $300,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $300,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 53 Packet Pg. 211 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,805,198 sruvs: -- __.__.__ ....— -- �78ptM� �i►,:p, Brsh `, l Aw R— _ T i Prr�ppsed Edmards Waterfront center II •-:, ,Kxr i� ara+ nwr ss.acc .o.wrrr err w rx M�ryr�kOrldr� �.. r — wpo-.e rarq K+r+� rrra,wcn ara �----•- re+.a k,w¢',n�va, n Raw M1opw�tl �Imn Owe Yw ♦or�.�yrro�.r.. anM vueew..�e r.n p.r.r� n r+sRfr�,-Owf yF." PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot, and frontage improvements. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. This project includes the Cit 's support for the parking lot and frontage improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center. One of the top priorities in the PROS Ian is too en up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering $67,500 Construction $2,588,645 1 % for Art $24,920 TOTAL $2,681,065 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 54 Packet Pg. 212 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,250,000 Completion — Ebb Tide r�r AV idi- s i`� R:. i - -•i. '1. ISO AIL PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 Engineering Construction $150,000 $1,000,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $250,000 $1,000,000 x all or part of this Project may quality for 1 % for the Arts LL a o: 0 a_ U N t x w r c m E r r Q 55 Packet Pg. 213 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow Creek ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD Daylighting — Design & Construction Marsh as it existed in 1941 General Project Location PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a placeholder to allow for freedom of discovery to fulfill PROS plan goals and support Governor's Inslee's $363MM capital budget for salmon recovery. culvert removal, water quality, and water supply projects that will expand and improve salmon habitat. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Potential acquisition of property currently owned by UNOCAL with future control to be WSDOT Project Benefit/Rationale: When this project is completed, it will fulfill needs of citizens for open space as per the PROS plan, promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL 56 Packet Pg. 214 9.2.e CIP PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FUND 332 - PARKS CONSTRUCTION 57 Packet Pg. 215 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b T .r Q 58 Packet Pg. 216 9.2.e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Final design and construction of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor. Starting from 2009 public process and concept design, develop site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", installed to draw attention and interest to the corridor and enhance the visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The Cultural Heritage Walking Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park Service Preserve America grant program, was implemented in 2011-2014 with 8 artist made historic plaques on 4th Avenue. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the recently established goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District application. Design completion will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project implementation phase. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 $250,000 Engineering & Administration Construction $500,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $100,000 $750,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts E c� L 0 L a. E i 0 L Q E r .Q M V Ln N O N O N O N C R C 0 a 0 2 U M U- a U a� 0 0- 0 L a w 0 6M N x w r c a� E U M r a 59 Packet Pg. 217 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,600,000 IMM M91 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic Park master plan is complete and has been adopted, funds (including carryover, grants, bonds, REET, Park Impact Fee's and General Fund) have been allocated and we are prepared to go to bid in February with ground breaking in April or May of 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds have been set aside, and grant funds secured. With the approved bonding we are ready to begin the project. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning and $395,000 Design Engineering $140,000 Construction $11,937,092 1 % Art $88,000 TOTAL 12,560,092 r Q 60 Packet Pg. 218 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $34M Improvements South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with federal transportation funds. WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; Protected through Deed -of -Right RCW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redefine the park to better serve the community as it accommodates the new alignment of Willow Creek. The project will include parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, potential concession areas, restrooms, upgraded play area, upgraded benches and picnic tables and BBQ's, Improved ADA accessibility, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges connecting the park across Willow Creek, personal watercraft staging and launching area, bicycle racks, fencing, and retaining the existing beach/ driftwood area and off leash area. The Marina Beach Master planning includes daylighting Willow Creek which requires removal of a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's and is the only exchange between the Puget Sound and our Freshwater Edmonds Marsh Estuary (PROS open space and habitat goals). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Marina Beach Park is a highly used and beloved public open space in the City. Through the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Action Plan and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan the community identified the need to restore the adjacent Edmonds Marsh, re-established for salmon habitat. After careful review and the completion of a feasibility study, the preferred method to accomplish this is to daylight Willow Creek from Edmonds Marsh into the Puget Sound, through Marina Beach Park. Improvements to retain this site as an asset to our regional waterfront park system. The natural tidal exchange from the removal of the 1,600 pipe will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 61 Packet Pg. 219 9.2.e COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study $30,000 $250,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction REET $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Construction 332 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 1 % for Art TOTAL 1 $30,000 1 $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 1 $250,000 $250,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. E 0 M 0 a c m E d 0 L 0. E Q M U In N O N O N O N C M C M IL d 0 U. Q 0 U d N 0 Q. 0 L a U. 0 a_ U r� a 62 Packet Pg. 220 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within the park system. Zones scheduled for Mathay Ballinger Park and Civic Park. Supported by grant from Verdant. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Professional Services Construction $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 r a 63 Packet Pg. 221 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,805,198 sruvs: -- __.__.__ ....— -- �78ptM� �i►,:p, Brsh `, l Aw R— _ T i Prr�ppsed Edmards Waterfront center II •-:, ,Kxr i� ara+ nwr ss.acc .o.wrrr err w rx M�ryr�kOrldr� �.. r — wpo-.e rarq K+r+� rrra,wcn ara �----•- re+.a k,w¢',n�va, n Raw M1opw�tl �Imn Owe Yw ♦or�.�yrro�.r.. anM vueew..�e r.n p.r.r� n r+sRfr�,-Owf yF." PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot, and frontage improvements. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. This project includes the Cit 's support for the parking lot and frontage improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center. One of the top priorities in the PROS Ian is too en up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering $67,500 Construction $2,588,645 1 % for Art $24,920 TOTAL $2,681,065 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 64 Packet Pg. 222 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,250,000 Completion — Ebb Tide r�r AV idi- s i`� R:. i - -•i. '1. ISO AIL PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 Engineering Construction $150,000 $1,000,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $250,000 $1,000,000 x all or part of this Project may quality for 1 % for the Arts LL a o: 0 a_ U N t x w r c m E r r Q 65 Packet Pg. 223 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Estuary ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Marsh as it existed in 1941 General Project Location PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary restoration will restore the natural tidal exchange between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. This project will enhance its many ecological functions and wildlife found within the interior of the Marsh. This project will be coordinated with Stormwater. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The natural tidal exchange will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. Conditions that support migratory birds and waterfowl will also be improved. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has many stormwater components - engineering, removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh, cleaning culverts to improve hydrology and reduce flooding during high flows. Stormwater companion stormwater project known as the Dayton Street Pump Station was also recently completed to assist in flooding on Dayton Street as a result of the Shellebarger Marsh. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL 66 Packet Pg. 224 9.2.e CIP PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FUND 423.76 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 67 Packet Pg. 225 9.2.e E L O L CL E O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C fC d N d r R LL R .Q R U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ T .r Q 68 Packet Pg. 226 9.2.e PROJECT NAME: Carbon Recovery I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $24,585,000 Belt Dryer F q:IcullLLre 1Q $i and g Malmals V 3� ��°6 Printing PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Carbon Recovery project would replace the sanitary sewage incinerator (SSI) and associated equipment. The SSI is 30 years old and must meet stringent EPA and PSCAA regulations which mandate a full replacement after 50% of the original cost in O&M upgrade has been expensed. Cost of regulatory compliance alone is estimated to be >$100,000/year. Many pieces of equipment within the SSI system are beyond their life expectancy and many are not supported by manufacturers. The Design for the proiect is scheduled for completion in earlv 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The replacement technology being proposed in the Phase 6 Carbon Recovery project is a belt dryer, pyrolysis units and odor control system. The pyrolysis equipment will be housed in a new building within the current WWTP footprint and would be fully integrated into the plant control system. Furthermore, the Carbon Recovery project is the single best opportunity for the WWTP to meet the goals and objectives of the Council Resolution 1389 which commits Edmonds to achieving or exceeding the environmental goals established in the Paris Accords by reducing "greenhouse gas" emissions. The project will provide a beneficial use of the end product, referred to as "biochar", while reducing O&M cost in terms of electricity, regulatory compliance, ongoing maintenance, hauling and disposal costs. The project would be shared with our treatment partners as follows: Mountlake Terrace 23.17% $6,423,034 Olympic View Water/Sewer 16.55% $4,587,367 Ronald Sewer District 9.49% $2,629,747 Edmonds 50.79% $14,076,406 SCHEDULE: 2020-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Design Construction $11,037,000 $16,358,000 500,000 TOTAL 1 11,449,456.15 I $16,358,000 I 500,000 69 Packet Pg. 227 9.2.f CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN � O-V ECM 0 U N DRAFT Packet Pg. 228 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q Packet Pg. 229 9.2.f CFP GENERAL E c� L O aL c m E a� O L Q U LO N O N Co N O N C C R a N d r u m LL .Q R u N N O O_ O L a U- 1.I� a U- U r a Packet Pg. 230 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b a U- U Q Packet Pg. 231 9.2.f N U d .O LL a U m 0 C a m o o a 13 N E y � O 'a N N W « C O _ CcN O U _ N T LL R „ U � d 'Q d {fl U a O � p N N � N O � O � N N N N N O O W N N N N N O r N 0 0 0 ONi O V l0 0 0 0 0 Q n N 0 0 0 0 M cO O O O V I� M O h V L � O � O � O G N O M O N V a y W U � ; y OI - O y LL O E N y D y o c o > U mo .W. w O¢ E m= F W¢ o o C7 ~ O ~ rc d LL u) d (!J a Ci a` ci o U G rn O n N 0 0 0 0 O O O O f N O (V 0 0 0 0 I� N cl V r M O 0 o N O O O O O po f9 f9 f9 f9 69 N O O O po f9 f9 f9 N N O 0 N C6 fA fA �li C6 � C U W v W W P W N a Ca n V y 6 p a o U 0 �o C J W t a y O C Y ¢ a O m o a a m o a W o o a A N N C ro a E m W a a —�T. i O N t t0 W Y W C Y A >o o OCU $ j E c o o E y o n E d c W 0 0 n a > E o o E n o f m m a o— oamom Sroo aCa N N W Ea o a W U_ m y o Im E. E �o — t m m a o > ¢s rn gm W � s= ya U o E o Em LL c etl ^o sd ii ci O m a O CL M O O N W R9 O O O Cr O O � N O O O O O Cr N N fA N b W LL O w y m 01 .W aWC Y ^ �, M H3 t9 Ny O) O d E 0 N W a U a o LLI 3 E Q o o ¢ _ u) > W O. C .s. U y 0 O o W ro O N .6 ro m .. d a y= W m- m o o o y o� U a o E n� E �ooE 2E,' o aE�moUropo U m o ro R m 3 s s a o n E t y o ro .. E c N rn� W S E m o o o t ^a^V1 U o U O d O m W Y W N W c O` oC U 'mU l6 m U D 3'W3 33S3�Sw 0 d id o n d E O o 0 o � � m a> 3�3 9 Y 7 9 Y 7 N o a � m O N N IL j a U N m o W E U U 3 C Y j O � m 7 W o o c LL o @ o y E o E g m n" �y3a o"oa W W E aY U N o N yam^oWoid E nro m E a m —r�3 CO s m E~ E a; o`er oa W croio Z W M. a o o o !-' m m m ro c ro a y wop 3 WL o o E N N o' N r o t a ro d fn = N H O Y Co O 3 c 3U aZ o y w o m oW m3 ro m e y o= ag o f 2 e p tiros o o m E— �C6 Em— w2 a3 w¢o E m L tm 0 a c m E O E m U N O N O N O N m C m IL N m U. 0. m U N N O 0. 0 a U- LPL a U- U Q Packet Pg. 232 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q Packet Pg. 233 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $13,100,000 IMM M91 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic Park master plan is complete and has been adopted, funds (including carryover, grants, bonds, REET, Park Impact Fee's and General Fund) have been allocated and we are prepared to go to bid in February with ground breaking in April or May of 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds have been set aside, and grant funds secured. With the approved bonding we are ready to begin the project. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning and $395,000 Design Engineering $140,000 Construction $11,937,092 1 % Art $88,000 TOTAL 1 12,560,092 r Q Packet Pg. 234 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8 M Complex at the Former Woodway High School ra CIA HOGAN .._...®p,s ..._ a ,.,.� ,.�.,.... rC)R lER wOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS PRE PAnto fOX THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT MAY FOV PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an additional $6-8M. SCHEDULE: 2020-2039 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026- COST 2039 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $6-8r " all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts 8 Q Packet Pg. 235 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Estuary ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD (Willow Creek Daylighting) Marsh as it existed in 1941 General Project Location PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary restoration will restore the natural tidal exchange between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. This project will enhance its many ecological functions and wildlife found within the interior of the Marsh. Funds will be used to support the grant writing efforts. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The natural tidal exchange will allow juvenile Chinook salmon and other marine life to utilize the estuary. Similarly, the restoration will allow Coho and Chum salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek for spawning; note that the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery is located adjacent to the Marsh. Conditions that support migratory birds and waterfowl will also be improved. The increased volume and rate of saltwater exchange will also allow a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna. Likewise, the increased tidal exchange will reduce the accumulation of contaminants and increase oxygenation within the Marsh. The estuarine functions including its role in the aquatic food web and the delivery of nutrients to coastal waters will also be enhanced. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise impacts and enhance natural carbon sequestration (blue carbon offset). Lastly, the project will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has a stormwater component which will require removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. The stormwater project will require cleaning out culverts on to improve hydrology and reduce flooding during high flows and engineering as provided by the companion stormwater project known as the Dayton Street Pump Station was also recently completed to assist in flooding on Dayton Street as a result of the Shellebarger Marsh. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL Packet Pg. 236 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million Maintenance & Operations Building Existing Building Outline Yard Fu Mo 4 0 0 �,Ikw — 100 Ldading r New One 1, 00 Sf 6,600 Sf Building Driveway — 15,600—sf-- L)L--- -- Yard Functions � 11,910 If Pedmeter zone — 4,200 Sf Existing Fence Line 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City parks and Capital facilities for the long term. SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real estate taxes. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2039 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $3m - $4m r Q 'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 10 Packet Pg. 237 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,805,198 sruvs: -- __.__.__ ....— -- �78ptM� �i►,:p, Brsh `, l Aw R— _ T i Prr�ppsed Edmards Waterfront center II •-:, ,Kxr i� ara+ nwr ss.acc .o.wrrr err w rx M�ryr�kOrldr� �.. r — wpo-.e rarq K+r+� rrra,wcn ara �----•- re+.a M1opw�tl �Imn Owe Yw ♦or�.�yrro�.r.. anM vueew..�e r.n p.r.r� n r+sRfr�,-Owf yF." PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot, and frontage improvements. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. This project includes the Cit 's support for the parking lot and frontage improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center. One of the top priorities in the PROS Ian is too en up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2020-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering $67,500 Construction $2,588,645 1 % for Art $24,920 TOTAL $2,681,065 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 11 Packet Pg. 238 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q 12 Packet Pg. 239 9.2.f CFP TRANSPORTATION E 0 L tm 0 a c m E as 0 L 0. m U N O N O N O N C m C m IL U) A) r 0 U. Q 0 U d N 0 0. 0 L a U- 0 a U- U Q 13 Packet Pg. 240 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b a U- U Q 14 Packet Pg. 241 9.2.f a LL y U y N y C' y C S 4 N y c O a W O N W = T O N « LL a" f1�c « y m � U s s 0 N N O N M � g S g off �ryry �qq �qq tl W� tl tl tltl 2 2 S 2 Tn Fi Tn ^ F & U 2 2 U off o M tV O N 1 E2 N N� Oy Oy Oy Nm a°i m a°i m a°i m a°i m a°i a°i m m m m S m V m m V m m @ m m m LL &a Ell -8i 8-� &a 8-� &a 8a �a 8a 8i &a N y O N U O W - w� N O mt - m o O 4 i[f b - i9 w U N O - IL U U U U U U U U U tJ U m = f7 (7 [7 m C7 m [7 - m m 'S [7 [7 ai O a ¢ a a a a at ao a a a ` m d w oo 'a a r .Yo s m v_ �m am �; =Ems =„o ��N Qm` got W=� Q.1 �o °'y 6 ^an Ems' �.- aiE� ya yE'gn .�aE Q$mC Wm_ c.� 3na� o�j a� J. ;om.tl ti5•�`� ti'o N5°o'4� '��?� 2m �; E wa% y cp nr`n =E 33�' 3�E 3mm� E°u EE u°i cim ci80`� =`m3 Ern L6 E It N y y _ [1 S ¢ y N E y E 3 N E 1 w 3 N m c N 3 2 2 E 2 E 2 E rm 15 Packet Pg. 242 9.2.f a LL y V N y C' y C EL 4 N y C O a W O L1 W = T p N « LL a" f1�c « y m � U s s os 0 N N O N � � N N M M Nto O N M M O� N N N N N GH 0 N Nm 5 m ii 8 a�i 9 m ii o m 5 - ii S a�i 9 m 70 o � F c c N U � O' y N f f» fn � vi to N w m - 1 a U U U U �a a v � 42, v O Unaaa � Eo E�.� a 4 m dE a o m ..aE ;aN 3 �m�o Em d g 3 s 4 y my 3 c 3 c n c42 a o y ffi m E 3 s y � E 0 0 E � E C Q u d mv1 hE yE E, O- g S g g o ct g n S g o s -os i9 fN i9 fo � fo W s M a M a M a M a y N F y y F y N F y y F y N F y y F y N W F o y U N S 8 8 ao wg wS - .1 di di U (J U U U U U I o a _ o a o a o a o a a rn N Q` wy m m M a oo .E a V o c E Q yiq 4N `vi .`E Em E nE E n`� o n.E n3 >• �� t » r x mot 2 Ev1 Ey u- E¢v1 EQ3 c Q Q3 N y 6 y y 2 E L E E E m E O yaw In c E Qr Qr N¢ y 3 m3 N �+ a` Ny - 3y 3 n m tm O L a W E 0 0. E �1 m V.^ YI N O N 1 O N O N m C m FL r m U. R r 0. m U d N O Q. 0 a U- 9 In a U- U 's K W V Q 16 Packet Pg. 243 9.2.f 0 N b O N � M g GH M M N 0 a qo ci q R o's oo.I No N �y S8 -a- ci as Ns o8 os Cw (2 i9 s i9 N=b W b� i9 - � H 0 Q N O •ii N YI GM N N 0 $ N O N O N .N� y N �y' �y' �y' a c c N � 5 m ii S a°i 9� ii o 9 m ii 9 a°i 9� ii o m 5- ii 8 a°i 9 m ii o m 5- ii 8 a°i 9 A ii o S. 9 A ii o S. 9- ii P 9 m ii o i+ � •U 8a &a m 8-g_ fC _ _ LL R r/.� N G Rv _ I i4 m as H M H H H H M H -- -- V Nf H - m m N W N 0 •o O. a 2 zi �' 8i' $ U Q OL IL LL m m - LL O a a a rn a a a a a a a LL �3 cQ SQL oy O1 c .E ¢� m �¢ ho Bs f/1W a a ay �¢ Bo F uQ V?E 'm mT ; Bfn'o gy q O c ° oNc �a 2 c onE a:2Ut r ; ; ° E`mE y ENE �a� E c o r gm'E yc so 3c m¢ g'n yEm 'k 2y m ° a � - :yc i aom15 > w m s f :4 O o 3 ai a m E ¢ ¢ E 'o_ U 'gam E W o W Tn w E y o 3 o E N g y y E Z c a = N w Q 8 n 97 « _ Aags E ram+ 4 � 3 17 Packet Pg. 244 9.2.f a LL y V N y C' y C S a N y CO O a W N W = C N « LL a" f1�C « y m � U s s s s s s 0 N b N N � N N M M M M C OFy N oS SS O N N N N N M M M N N M M c N 5 m ii S 9 A ii o 5 m ii S 9� ii o 9 m ii P 9� ii o 9 m ii P U F rn go F y u F y N U F y u F y N U F N y 0 N U O' y N f f» fn w vi vi w to vi vi w � vi w U N O c � m " � O a �¢ ra05 ga �y Z'�� drnw my m3 a asp w aN E am_ E ai E ai E a 5 ao E aso y3o a3 °i3 a3 03 m; a¢3 ala¢y a`in avi Eli 'a3 E s E S¢ 65 ti m m ti m z _ x x c ¢ o E E .E E E ¢y aN aN in3 in3 a � t< 5" Na Na oo mop 18 Packet Pg. 245 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $11,700,000 to 95th PI. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th Pl. W to three lanes (with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit would also look into creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW if this project moves forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2023 (pending funding). More than half the project is within Esperance / Snohomish County. A Sound Transit System Access grant was submitted in May '19 to fully fund this project but the grant wasn't secured. Sound Transit also has funding available through ST3 to improve accessibility to the Sound Transit Station. Mukilteo and Edmonds have $40 Million in combined funding to complete projects improving access to the Sound Transit Station (for all modes of transportation). The City indicated to Sound Transit that this project should to be considered by Sound Transit and it is currently being evaluated. A final response from Sound Transit whether this project is funded or not is scheduled for late 2019. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026- 2040 Planning/Study Engineering, $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Admin., & ROW Construction $9,700,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $9,700,000 19 Packet Pg. 246 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000,000 Gateway/Revitalization E L 0 L a c m E a� 0 L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C C R d N d r PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement U sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access contro UT and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. a� PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access 0 management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved. a SCHEDULE: The conceptual phase began in September 2017 and was completed in December 2018. An interim project has been identified with the addition of raised median along the entire corridor from 244t" St. SW to 212t" ST. SW (to address safety issues along the corridor). The design phase is scheduled to begin in November 2019. The addition of a traffic signal at Hwy. 99 @ 234t" St. SW is also,, priority project, adding a pedestrian crossing between 238t" St. SW and 228t" St. SW (� 1 mile distance , with no crossing). $10M from a Connecting Washington allocation has been secured, with $91VI not available prior to 2021. COST BREAKDOWN W PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-204( COST E Planning/Study Engineering & $60,000 $500,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $24,000,OC Q Administration & ROW Construction $858,000 6,300,000 $138,000,OC 1 % for Art TOTAL $918,000 $500,000 $2,000,000 $6,300,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $162,000,0( 20 Packet Pg. 247 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000 intersection improvements i 21 g sw I i w W Paalung s gn shop / n 7313 P.U.B 3 Edmonds Edmonds / W Family Clinic ei Public 17-ks ADX KENNEL 21 1 27114 / f Arbor Q 2I / P. 27109 R n lle Box / / 212TH ST SW 7,.59RI "3"2" L 215THSTSW PLANT AEGIS W SWEDISH m MDNnSCAM— ' ALLIED / ROOFING / / / B&M / CON ST 21414 / 21448 / / / NCnONRLD' / 01 1ALUE / PILLAGE / 16TH ST/SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 21211 St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200' storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #4). The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2025 (unsecured funding).The project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is within Lynnwood. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering, $175,000 $1,091,000 ROW, & Administration Construction $1,540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,000 Q 21 Packet Pg. 248 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000 intersection improvements 2141021 c^ 13�408w 214021d12 { 21405 04 LU N U 2> 120L< 2i431MC�UHA6' un � anz 150 r 2150021558EGIS VA LU E VILLAGE ST SVU — 21BTlM 21600 {� 21619 KRUGER CLINIC f 21632 � � - ��I16e 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane and an eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2025 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW & Administration $204,000 $334,000 Construction $1,837,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $204,000 $334,000 $1,837,000 Q 22 Packet Pg. 249 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000 intersection improvements TOP FOODS v �, 19TH sr SW / 21919 STARBU S / / 220TH ST SW I I I I 1221 I I I I I 13 _I � � l4 n III •0. 7301 W U O e S C m .M. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325' storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #2). The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and safety. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2025 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST -Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $175,000 $1,085,000 Construction $1,955,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,000 23 Packet Pg. 250 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,300,000 intersection improvements ESPE&ANCE F] — 1i711 21202 17 S-IMO PL W i «n �• �I 21]31 233RD PLy� 1 • 71J7C'. _ - : i321 ff -- �34TFS ST.SW _.-. } l3 a'•• 3]406■�� 1 DIM ]l1 1 1712 1� 2341� r3111 "2141f 23+17 :,e r ul .. .. 131*1 :Sa7t ny 1 I I 7 i'$I� �It_ .' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW to provide safer crossing of Hwy. 99 for vehicles and non -motorized transportation (project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan). These intersection improvements are included as part of the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project. The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety and pedestrian conditions along the corridor. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2025 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $300,000 $300,000 Construction $1,200,000 $1,500,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $300,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 r Q 24 Packet Pg. 251 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 196th St. SW (SR-524) @ ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000 88th Ave. W Intersection Improvements 1em 3 ILU _ a_ .~a I m :VEN DAY WENTIST :HURCH 4 1eeTM sr sw PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW. SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2025 (unsecured funding). In order to allow the installation of a traffic signal, the MUTCD traffic signal warrants must be met and the installation must be approved by WSDOT (since 196th St. SW is a State Route / SR-524). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & $193,000 $175,000 Administration Construction $535,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $193,000 $175,000 $535,000 25 Packet Pg. 252 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9t" Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $896,000 N Q x J __J1 MH__JI __�, BELL ST UJ a I - � P MAIN ST WADE JAMES � TH EATE R L � W� a r H oavraN n PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2023 and construction in 2024. (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering, $120,000 Administration & ROW Construction $776,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $120,000 $776,000 26 Packet Pg. 253 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 7611 Ave. W @ 22011 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Intersection Improvements $8,109,000 S STARBU KS J 220TH Sr 5w 14 zz� sr Pt sw LYNWOOD HONDA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. SCHEDULE: A STP Federal grant was secured in 2018 for the Design Phase (funds not available until 2021). The ROW and construction phases are currently unfunded. The design phase and ROW phases are scheduled to be completed in 2022 and construction in 2024 (pending additional grant funds). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW $533,000 $876,000 Administration Construction $6,700,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $533,000 $876,000 $6,700,000 . All or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the arts 27 Packet Pg. 254 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95t" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000 Intersection Improvements W H r ST S a CC rn cl WESTGATE CHAPEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 unsecured funding COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $75,000 Construction $420,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $420,000 2s Packet Pg. 255 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000 Intersection Improvements i 10 ■ To Hwy 99 41� 239TH ST SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,138,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,138,000 Q 29 Packet Pg. 256 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000 N SEAVIEW PARK 3 PLSW 186TH ST SW ml I m—I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2026 and 2040 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering, Administration, & ROW $200,000 Construction $983,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,183,000 30 Packet Pg. 257 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000 to 238th St. SW) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided. SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2026 and 2040 (unsecured funding). The project costs would be split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is located within Esperance. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering, $2,000,000 Administration, & ROW Construction $13,441,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $15,441,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 31 Packet Pg. 258 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468 Intersection Improvements / Access Management I EDMONDS WAY �% � MMI -a 0L I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2023 and 2024 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $867,468 1 % for Art TOTAL $150,000 $867,468 Q 32 Packet Pg. 259 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000 Intersection Improvements *T-4 240iA PL SYY. 'l o'ISI S1 sw LT r�:au I ietluvnLsw ' f I 141111, 1i SW �y LY4Y ai F J LAKE BALLINGEA HAY— - — - —. — MP EMA(MI)S WAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040. The project costs would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds since half the intersection is located within Shoreline. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $453,000 Construction $2,564,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $3,017,000 33 Packet Pg. 260 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 17411 St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000 SW Intersection Improvements L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — — J-/, Parking L_ b 6WI St. Thomas Moore —� a e I Catholic School B Ilfield y / SanctuarY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2026 and 2040 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $100,000 Construction $510,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $610,000 Q 34 Packet Pg. 261 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,050,000 from Bell St to Caspers St. s UHDVIEwavrs ♦ ♦ �� I■� 11111■0 I ��' IIIIIII :M1■S■1 ■ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing waterfront (— 112 mile / more recent project). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements were installed in 2017 through striping, in order to evaluate the alignment of the proposed walkway and parking alternatives The design phase is scheduled to be completed in 2023. Construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2024 when utility improvements are scheduled to be completed along this stretch. No grant funding has been secured for the construction phase. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning/Study Engineering & $295,000 Administration Construction $2,595,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $295,000 $2,595,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. w a 0 a w U x w r a� E U 2 w r Q 35 Packet Pg. 262 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 23211d St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 100th Ave. W to SR-104 EDMONDS WAY W SANK iwnRs LLI L ! Ell 2 . ■ ■ Qy - 1 �i IF Al. 10 UUT H ' CHURCH, (jr ■ ■ ■ , Uj 7 , ■ AW �I o �0 c� 2 ODW' ' I ESTATES AY OLy I _ PR RK \29 9 Dorn 98 7 6 5 ' 30 2 15 3 14 7• J \32 45 32 ■ r jr `2q 7 1 nm (0) 1 � ■ � e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2024-2025 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 N 0 a 0 L IL LL 0 a LL U x w r c as E z 0 a 36 Packet Pg. 263 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 2361" St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000 from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W M PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2024-2025 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $213,000 Construction $1,182,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $213,000 $1,182,000 r Q 37 Packet Pg. 264 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW L PARK EonnoNos SAL GALLL APTS m w w LL CH RIST LNTH E RAN CH N RCH O PARK & RIDE OFFICE 236:1 4SUHSET 23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L KJIHG R23607 23619 0 P ��R AURORAS MARKETPLACET N 239TH ST SW W SEOUL 23821 PLAZA 2 23827 TRAVEL LODGE 0" NORTH ry HAVEN z n MANOR w a � R p r~ } n•1L LO'N 13ROCK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2025 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $495,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $90,000 $495,000 a 38 Packet Pg. 265 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,996,000 from 206th St. SW to 212th ST. SW I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized transportation safety including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). SCHEDULE: 2024-2025 (funding unsecured). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $333,000 Construction $1,663,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $333,000 $1,663,000 39 Packet Pg. 266 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 21811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W ■■■■N� ��■■ mom r- �A ■■ oil OENT ER Ira&, U1 E PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2024-2025 unsecured funding COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 a 40 Packet Pg. 267 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000 Ave. S to 4th Ave. S ARTS W ENTER a Z UNDOW NEI N ALDER ALDER ST 346 414 412 410 arking 5 5 LA UJ o SOUND VIEW o: HOWELL WAY W a x v DAYTON ST OLD MILLTOWN MAPLE ST TRIC ALDER ST N W a FBECKWT'S z BAN K T- 409 530Pancak 407 540 Hau s 4003 546 0 401 w a WALNUT Sr --F GREGORY e H 525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4th Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2023 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Stud Engineering & Administration $10,000 Construction $95,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $105.000 " all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 41 Packet Pg. 268 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000 Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W 21400 � JJ 7200 B&M PARK & RIDE CONS E ar- w 21410 21408 0. MAN J � o � 21401 21412 � v M1 2140 214G7 W � w � W 21507 / 21511 j 21431 M DONAL6' { IL y o Y N 0 21521 N I M STEVEN 21500 E T AEGIS 215587 VALUE VILLAGE 216TH $T Z 120 216TH :VEN5 21600 { 21619 ci' tILION KRUGER *Aq CLINIC , .01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2023 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $30,000 Construction $127,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $157,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 42 Packet Pg. 269 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $830,000 8tn Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S IR L ■ P, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S. This project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 (funding unsecured). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $175,000 Construction $655,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $655,000 r a 43 Packet Pg. 270 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,330,000 from Main St. to 2001h St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2024 and construction in 2024 / 2025 (funding unsecured). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & $436,000 Administration Construction $947,000 $947,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $436,000 $947,000 $947,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 44 Packet Pg. 271 9.2.f PROJECT NAME:95th PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Engineering is scheduled for 2023 and construction in 2024 (funding unsecured) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $100,000 Construction $485,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $100,000 $485.000 45 Packet Pg. 272 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Railroad Ave. Sidewalk from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $862,000 Dayton St. to SR-104 bt. 4� fi �tio-P W NAYTON 5T P❑ a ? Fo �ONn. ea a 4k DAYTON ST PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination points such as Senior Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds... . SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2023 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $160,000 Construction $702,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $160,000 $702,000 Q 46 Packet Pg. 273 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W non- I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: motorized transportation safety improvements $1,210,000 mr— Ra In a. IqN r� w MS. -V iy ��19 ka,jdN95 WAraFFRq .. _ � LAKE 8At LINGER WRIT-- - - -- - - - Tio MONO WAY PLO a ,.fir r s� sw zr Nla V --�dND5 RFLIIVF LAKi iiAL1.IN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2023 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all phases). This intersection is shared with Shoreline and they own the traffic signal. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $224,000 Construction $986,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $224,000 $986,000 r Q 47 Packet Pg. 274 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000 from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W 1� 192ND PL 5W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $630,000 48 Packet Pg. 275 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 10411 Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000 from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $840,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $990,000 49 Packet Pg. 276 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW ----- 77T---------------220THSTSW— PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $55,000 Construction $260,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 50 Packet Pg. 277 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW r `T r 5■■ i i .� 44 T'■ F U ti ri 186TH ST W m W i-� --. r ■ ■ 18 TH 5 5W ■ 1 L ■ - ��' - ■�� 188TH 5T SW LE r7 ■ L 1 � � WI 1 r L r J r r SFAMF W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $60,000 Construction $255,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 r Q 51 Packet Pg. 278 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 23611 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000 from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W ■ PARK & RIDE 236TH ST SN 2367 2303 SAFEN 235 JI 23607 NON PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $650,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $765,000 52 Packet Pg. 279 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 23811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000 from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W 1 PARK r .•nrIRL NA LN ' , ■ ' EOMONOs APTS BALL ' • • 1 ��r� W w Ov NORTH m CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH S N PARK & RIDE R n - 2 TH T OFFICE ■ d `� ,4 , W r SAFEWAY � L KJIHG FC,� I ' L • . SUNSET '•n•1L LO•n: CEj BROOK ■ AURORA- MARKETPLACE FAMILYPANCAKEr j7' � 1 ■ 238TH ST SW "' ■ ■ ■ 23827 seouL PLAZA ' ■ ► 1 23827, TRAVEL LODGE 2397 ■ -MISISON TACO TIM ■ ST. FRA NCIS MOTEL WHSE ■ME . . . - ■ ■ ■ _+ K&EMOTEL 1 1 ■ ■ � I, 1:11 RIl RIl III F 1 ■ ■ ■ � , IN ■ ■ :yA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $175,000 Construction $995,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,170,000 LL 0 a LL U x w c as E a 53 Packet Pg. 280 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W / 180th St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,135,000 SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 20200 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering, ROW, & Administration $440,000 Construction $1,695,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $440,000 $1,695,000 54 Packet Pg. 281 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: 189th PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2026-2040 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $470,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $585,000 55 Packet Pg. 282 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000 Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. SCHEDULE: 2023 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $50,000 Construction $307,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $357,000 56 Packet Pg. 283 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Citywide Bicycle ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 Improvements x a T.,.,I�-.-- - -- - Pnpo dBke Pekng �Bke ur.e �Exsug � b:te ® fw Vy 63x PaMNlLader � t k��ta _. . _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation bike lanes and sharrows along various stretches as identified on the Proposed Bike Facilities map of 2015 Transportation Plan PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). The intent of this project is to get more people riding their bikes and feel more comfortable riding their bikes on the roadway (with safety improvements). SCHEDULE: 2026-204 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2040 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $750,000 Construction $4,250,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000,000 r Q 57 Packet Pg. 284 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Dayton St. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $205,000 between 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S MAIN ST I i f Frances Anderson Center m , Of i navTn" IT LU sTj _ 4 ■ almF� I ILI MAP IlkW Q PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Dayton St between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S. This missing link was identified as #1 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. SCHEDULE: The Design was completed in 2019 and construction is scheduled for 2020. The project will be built with the Dayton St. Utility Replacements project (from 3rd Ave. S to 9th Ave. S). The funding source is a 2019 TIB Complete Street grant. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 192,290 1 % for Art TOTAL $192,290 r Q 58 Packet Pg. 285 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Downtown Lighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of street lights along various streets within Downtown Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project will improve lighting along various stretches within Downtown where street light poles / PUD pole don't currently exist. Those improvements will improve night-time safety for all transportation system users. More users will be encouraged to use active transportation to reach their destination during those hours Sound Transit Station and many other destinations within Downtown). SCHEDULE: The design and construction phases are scheduled to take place in 2023 (unsecured funding). Sound Transit has funding available through ST3 to improve accessibility to the Sound Transit Station. Mukilteo and Edmonds have $40 Million in combined funding to complete projects improving access to the Sound Transit Station (for all modes of transportation). The City submitted this lighting project to be considered by Sound Transit and it is currently being evaluated. A final response from Sound Transit regarding the projects that will be selected is scheduled for late 2019. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering, $100,000 Administration & ROW Construction $1,400,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,500,000 59 Packet Pg. 286 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: SR-104 Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $600,000 HAWK signal to Pine St. / Pine St. Walkway from SR-104 to 3rd Ave. S CITY PARK ■ _ f c'ER13EN DRMl J � d �I .° 0Mak PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St. and along Pine St. from SR-104 to 3rd Ave. S PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park. SCHEDULE: The design and construction phases are scheduled to take place in 2023 and 2024 (unsecured funding). A TIB grant was submitted for this project, with a response scheduled for late 2019. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering, Administration & ROW $135,000 Construction $465,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $135,000 $465,000 60 Packet Pg. 287 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $57,710 to 7th Ave. S Ma, Fm ;7 F 0 120 In M 9 NQ dA , N i a — tia, a . ... . — rT ALDER 5T -- .� ,1 -- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7t1 Ave. S. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. SCHEDULE: The Design and construction phases are scheduled to be completed in 2020. The funding source is a 2019 TIB Complete Streets grant. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $5,710 Construction $52,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $57,710 61 Packet Pg. 288 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q 62 Packet Pg. 289 9.2.f CFP STORMWATER LL 0 IL LL U t K w r c m E t u R .r r a 63 Packet Pg. 290 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQN I.b a U- U Q 64 Packet Pg. 291 a LL U m 'a r- a) O -a-- Lo E (n d O a y N w ' °� o = R N L) 3 N TLL E V o •Q N R U O O O O O M n o � � O � fA O O O M n O p � o co in a o O O � O v o n v � m O O O O n n � nN N � J N N W w c 3N � m d E m in itl ° c � � f � ° d o al -O LL N 0 � a r N 0 o m (7 d a N o a m c oc c d 2 3 O L Y c E U W N a W aoi 2i :Ec m c N c o'tUd 3W W ha~°io- N L y c c W-O ° -o 000 c- iuc�ao o c E Y a35 to,o �Fo U~ ca c c c E y `° N, - w 3�-o � W a).�'o -o o d c a E C Q U rO N E o W 0 m y c o °' c c ° E 3 c se am o W d 3 E2 o v a" 3 d w o c d c W �' o U o c W — m 0 0 o o d c c .o m e o, L m 'o o d :� AD 2 F- E U N L N F ?i O zN O W C O O W -- � L 111 L � Eo W v U o E o w 0 a a r o d � o � a c O o O l Y - o c N N �U c d J "> v c "a 3 m 03� o d ° rnLa E N 2 O Yf 0 65 9.2.f Packet Pg. 292 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q 66 Packet Pg. 293 9.2.f ' 00 200 _Q11 C -9tiI 1461 cw Q DAY TO N w a �z zo C0 a ¢ ry - CIP Z PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and supporting stormwater conveyance structures. The scope also includes baffle manholes to divert flows away from Harbor Square and the Edmonds Marsh, and provide a sub -surface connection for overflows. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St. and State Hwy 104. The Project is part of a series of projects recommended in the 2013 study of necessary storm water improvements related to Shellabarger Creek, Willow Creek, and Edmonds Marsh. The project is complimentary to the Willow Creek Daylighting project in that the pump is required to manage flood conditions after the daylighting project is completed. SCHEDULE: A construction contract has been awarded and is expected to be substantially complete in 2019. Total cost est. at $2.1 M; 2020 budget shown is intended for project close- out. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $15,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $15,000 67 Packet Pg. 294 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Estuary ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $16,650,000 Restoration / Willow Creek Daylighting - Design & Construction Aerial photo of Marsh from 2018 General Project Location Marsh as it existed in 1941 Updated project concept PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will daylight Willow Creek and help begin restoration efforts in a the Marsh. The project has three sub -components including (1) daylighting Willow Creek through the �- existing Unocal property, (2) daylighting of the Willow Creek through Marina Beach Park, and (3) U_ excavation/reestablishment of tidal channels within the Marsh. The project includes significant re - vegetation and mitigation within the Marsh to improve habitat conditions and, depending on the final o recommended alternative, may also include significant flood wall and/or berms. This project is a U_ component of the PROS plan (comprehensive plan) for open space, habitat and fulfills goals #1, #3 and U #4. r PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek and subsequent redevelopment of P Marina Beach park (not included) will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds w Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early 1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. The project, along with its companion CIP project E "Dayton Street Pump Station", will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. This project is a priority in the Edmonds PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2020 - 2025 a COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $775,000 $1,875,000 Construction $7,000,000 $7,000,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $775,000 $1,875,000 $r,000,000 $7,000,000 Packet Pg. 295 9.2.f PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park Infiltration ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $742,700 Facility Phase 2 —P I ✓ti �� Yafhot Frederick 175th Seaview 1 Park __ 78th n 180 •` v'F 181. 2nd h + ! a M A r i 185th 172n ' Y o IP ............ ....... I !P o 173 d N Ck a IP IP E y5 cc LC it IP IF o -4 o IF Ip 77t 1 7 h �t V l 79th J 1 Oth m Distribution Chamber - 8 nd Q` Q Diversion Structure �� IP Inspection Port Swirl Concentrator ss M Z (waler quahtyf tw.) Well � Modi}y flow Limits of Phase 1 i0 exist. diversion structure r Catch Basin A sketch of the project provided in grant application materials. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City applied for and received a grant from the Department of Ecology to design and construct an additional stormwater infiltration facility in Seaview Park. The proposal will duplicate the system successfully installed during Phase 1 and is tentatively planned for construction in 2022. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream reaches of the creek. A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was completed in 2015. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. Control of the sediment loads in Perrinville Creek must be achieved before proceeding with additional fish habitat improvement and removal of the sediment collection structure the City currently maintains on the creek near Talbot Road. SCHEDULE: Design is anticipated to begin in 2020 with construction planned for 2022 in order to allow ample time to acquire permits and meet grant obligations during the design phase. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 COST Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $241,000 $6,100 Construction $495,600 1 % for Art TOTAL $241,000 $6,100 $495,600 Q 69 Packet Pg. 296 9.2.f E L O L CL E i O L Q E .Q U LO N O N O N O N C R C Cu d N d r R LL R .Q Cu U O O 0- 0 L CL U- NQ a U- U Q 70 Packet Pg. 297 9.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Housing Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The Edmonds Comprehensive Plan is a broad policy document that also contains a handful of time - specific "implementation actions" to follow up on priority issues. The current implementation action for housing requires a housing strategy to be developed in 2019. In late 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution #1420 (see Attachment 1), docketing consideration of a comprehensive plan amendment that would revise the implementation action for housing as part of the next Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle. Since adopting the Resolution, the City Council established a Citizens' Housing Commission to make recommendations on housing polices by the end of 2020. (Note: "housing policies" are not necessarily the same as a "housing strategy.") Staff Recommendation Adopt the ordinance (attached) that has been prepared for 2019 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Narrative Resolution #1420, adopted in late 2018, identified two options to consider for amending the implementation action in the Comprehensive Plan. The Resolution's first option would simply delete any implementation action for housing; the second would extend the due date past 2019 to a date certain. Staff identified a third option to reflect the Council's more recent establishment of the Citizens' Housing Commission per Resolution # 1427, which would name "policies" instead of a "strategy" as the expected outcome and use the date the Council established for the Commission's work. In October, 2019, the Planning Board recommended a fourth option that was the same as Option 3 but with an added phrase: "...including input from the Planning Board". On November 4, 2019, the City Council considered the four options and then discussed a fifth option: Using a 2021 date and not specifically mentioning the Planning Board, given that the Planning Board always has input in the course of normal business. A possible concern about using the 2021 date without any caveats is that the public might assume this overrides the Housing Commission's current due date of December 2020 for policy recommendations. To clarify this, Option 6 was recommended as a "compromise" approach: "Provide housing policy options by the end of 2020 for City Council consideration, with additional input in 2021." The City Council reviewed these options as part of a public hearing on November 26. City Council gave direction to XXXXX. Packet Pg. 298 9.3 Next Steps An ordinance has been prepared for City Council action on December 3. The ordinance includes two topics for amending the Comprehensive Plan: one for the housing action item and a second for the updated long-term Capital Facilities Plan (consistent with any CFP changes requested by the Council on November 26). Attachments: 2019-11-19 ordinance amending comp plan Packet Pg. 299 9.3.a and ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2019 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the most significant update to the Comprehensive Plan occurred in 2015; WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 1420 to docket an amendment related to the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan for consideration in 2019; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would modify an "implementation action" contained in the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the current implementation action for housing requires a housing strategy to be developed by 2019; and WHEREAS, earlier this year, the City Council established a Citizens' Housing Commission to make recommendations on housing policy issues; and WHEREAS, the Citizens' Housing Commission will perform its work during the years 2019 and 2020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Housing Element on October 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recommended a slightly different amendment that reflects that contemplated work of the Citizens' Housing Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Housing Element on November 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facilities Plan is amended on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board considered the 2019 proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Plan Element during its meetings on October 9, 2019 and October 23, 2019; and Packet Pg. 300 9.3.a WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan on November 12, 2019; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2019 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and, specifically, the following Implementation Action from the Housing Element, is hereby amended to read as set forth below (new text shown in underline; deleted text shown in strikethreugh): Implementation Action: Develop a stfategy by 2019 for- io g the sply e ffn,.a ble i.,,,,sing and fneeting diverse .,,,,sing needs. Provide housing policy options by the end of 2020 for City Council consideration. Section 2. The 2019 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and, specifically, the Capital Facilities Plan Element, is hereby amended as described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 301 9.3.a APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 302 9.3.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2019 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 Packet Pg. 303 9.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Budget Amendment to Fund 2020 Council Retreat Training Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History Newly elected Council members will need an introduction to City Council and a training which will include procedures, Robert's Rules of Order, Council vs. Staff roles and responsibilities, finance, and public records. The 2020 retreat is scheduled for Friday, 2/7/20. In addition to supplies and meals, two facilitators will be hired to conduct the training in their areas of expertise. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The Council is asked to discuss and vote to approve this budget amendment for $4,500 paid for by the Ending Fund Balance to fund the 2020 retreat. Packet Pg. 304 9.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Fourth Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History Amend the 2019 Budget Ordinance 4161 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council reviews the Fourth Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment and approves Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2019 Budget. Narrative Packet Pg. 305 9.5 Page # Description Cash (Increase) Decrease General Fund 001 1 2 VEBA & PFML Benefits Public Defense Legal Counsel Impacts to Ending Cash ($100,940) ($4,757) ($105,697) Street Fund III 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($3,470) ($3,470) Combined Street Construction/Improvement Fund 112 5 76tth Avenue & 212th Intersection Improvements Impacts to Ending Cash ($24,000) ($24,000) Gifts Catalog Fund 127 3 Memorial Benches Impacts to Ending Cash $1,784 $1,784 Cemetery Maintenance Fund 130 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($270) ($270) Parks Capital Construction Fund 332 6 Civic Park Bonds Irnpacts to Ending Cash $3,700,000 $3,700,000 Water Fund 421 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($6,610) ($6,610) Storm Fund 422 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($5,260) ($5,260) Sewer / Treatment Plant Fund 423 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Irnpacts to Ending Cash ($11,930) ($11,930) Equipment Rental Fund 511 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($1,690) ($1,690) Technology Rental Fund 512 1 VEBA & PFML Benefits Impacts to Ending Cash ($2,630) ($2,630) Fireman's Pension 617 4 Premium Benefits & Disability Payments Impacts to Ending Cash ($8,200) ($8,200) Total of Impact to Ending Cash $ 3,532,027 Attachments: 2019 4th Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibits - final Packet Pg. 306 9.5 4th Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance Packet Pg. 307 9.5.a New Items for Council to Consider (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: This Budget adjustment is for VEBA contributions made in July 2019 and Paid Family Medical Leave benefits, which began 1/1/2019. Department: Administrative Services Division: IFinance Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Title: JBenefits Adjustment Name: Preparers iMarissa Cain Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 001 General Fund VEBA $ 72,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 001 General Fund PFML 28,940 - - - - I I I Street Fund VEBA 1,750 - - - - I I I Street Fund PFML 1,720 - - - - 130 Cemetery Maint Fund PFML 270 - - - - 421 Water Fund VEBA 4,500 - - - - 421 Water Fund PFML 2,110 - - - - 422 Storm Fund VEBA 3,250 - - - - 422 Storm Fund PFML 2,010 - - - - 423 Sewer Fund VEBA 6,750 - - - - 423 Sewer Fund PFML 5,180 - - - 511 Equipment Rental Fund VEBA 1,000 - - - 511 Equipment Rental Fund PFML 690 - - - 512 Technology Rental Fund VEBA 1,750 - - - 512 Technology Rental Fund PFML 880 - - - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 132,800 $ S S - $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ - S S S S Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 100,940 $ - $ - $ $ - 111.000.68.508.30.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 3,470 130.000.64.508.40.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 270 421.000.74.508.89.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 6,610 422.000.72.508.89.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 5,260 423.000.75.508.89.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 11,930 - - - - 511.000.77.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 1,690 512.000.31.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 2,630 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 132,800 $ -1 $ Packet Pg. 308 9.5.a New Items for Council to Consider (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: This budget adjustment is for the amendment to the Public Defense Professional Services contract with the Snohomish County Public Defense Association. Additional services were required due to case load limits under RCW. The extension of this contract was previously discussed with council on August 28, 2018, as well as the possibility for this expenditure increase due to regulations surrounding public defense case limits. Department: Human Resources Fund 001 GENERAL Division: Human Resources Title: Public Defense Name: Preparer: Jessica Neill Hoyson Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Public Defense Legal Services $ 4,757 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 4,757 $ - $ - $ - S - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ - $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 4,757) $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ (4,757) $ Packet Pg. 309 9.5.a New Items for Council to Consider (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: Requesting spending authority to purchase four memorial benches. Revenue associated with benches has already been collected. Positive impact to fund 127. Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Fund Name: 127 GIFTS CATALOG Division: Recreation Title: Memorial Benches Preparer: Shannon Burley Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 Supplies $ 10,216 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 10,216 $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 127.000.367.00.000.00 Private Contributions $ 12,000 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ 12,000 Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 127.000.64.508.30.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,784 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ 1,784 $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 310 9.5.a New Items for Council to Consider (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: This Budget Amendment is to cover costs for the Firemen's Pension Fund through the end of 2019. Department: Administrative Services Division: Finance Fund 617 FIREMEN'S Title: Firemen's Pension Fund Name: PENSION Preparer: Marissa Cain Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 617.000.51.517.20.23.10 Premium Benefits 1,700 - - - - 617.000.51.517.20.29.00 Pension & Disability Payments 6,500 - - - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 8,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 617.000.51.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (8,200) $ - $ - $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ 8,200 $ - $ - $ - $ Packet Pg. 311 9.5.a Previously Discussed by Council (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: This budget amendment will program transportation impact fees for the final close- out costs (final payment to contractor, staff time and consultant costs) related to the 76th-212th Intersection Improvement Project. Department: Public Works Fund Name: 112 STREET CONSTRUCTION Division: Engineering Title: 76th Ave/212th Intersection Improvements Preparer: Rob English Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Previously Discussed By Council Oct 22 2019 100% Self Funded One -Time Capital Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 112.000.68.542.33.41.67 Interfund Services $ 21,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 Professional Services 3,000 - - - - 112.502.68.597.95.55.12 Trans Impact Fees 119,000 - - - - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 143,000 $ - $ - S - S - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 112.000.397.42.112.00 Trans Impact Fees $ 119,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 119,000 1 $ - $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 112.502.68.508.30.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 119,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 112.000.68.508.30.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 95,000 - - - - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ (24,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 312 9.5.a Previously Discussed by Council (December 2019) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: October 30, 2019, the City issued the Civic Park Bonds and received $3,785,944 from the sale. The AAA rated bonds sold at a $300,944 premium and cost $85,944 to issue the bonds. This budget request will for this bond sale: 1) Increase Bond Proceeds revenue budget by $3,485,000 2) Increase Bond Premium revenue budget by $300,944, and 3) Increase Bond Issuance expenditure budget by $85,944 4) Increase Ending Fund Balance by $3,700,000 Department: Administrative Services Fund 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION Division: Finance Title: Civic Park Bonds Name: FUND Preparer: Scott James Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Previously Approved Budget By Council Jul 16 2019 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Capital Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 332.000.64.592.76.84.00 Bond Issuance Cost $ 85,944 $ - S - S Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 85,944 $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 332.000.391.10.000.00 Bond Proceeds $ 3,485,000 $ - S - S - $ - 332.000.392.00.000.00 Bond Premium 300,944 - - - - Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ 3,785,944 $ - $ $ $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 332.000.64.508.30.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 3,700,000 $ - $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ 3,700,000 $ - $ Packet Pg. 313 ORDINANCE NO. XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4161 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2019 Budget; and THEREFORE, WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4161 amending the budget for the fiscal year 2019 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D adopted herein by reference. 1 Packet Pg. 314 9.5.b Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING 2 Packet Pg. 315 9.5.b SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4161 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 316 9.5.b EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (December 2019) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 2019 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES 2019 ENDING FUND BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 11,233,278 45,688,605 45,623,944 11,297,939 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 333,447 437,980 466,920 304,507 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 929,908 28,210 931,523 26,595 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,564,260 218,287 3,835,827 1,946,720 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 12,607 5,230 11,200 6,637 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 210,221 - - 210,221 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 309,178 556,800 - 865,978 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 225,443 - 1,862 223,581 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 250,000 - 200,000 50,000 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 1 165,430 45,800 119,631 111 STREET FUND 1,343,329 1,859,270 2,255,498 947,101 112 COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE 859,217 7,258,933 7,035,395 1,082,755 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 570o633 152,647 181,880 541,400 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 18,899 580 - 19,479 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 89,938 98,264 108,934 79,268 121 EMPLOYEEPARKINGPERMITFUND 77,046 26,170 26,880 76,336 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 15,030 1,680 3,000 13,710 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 70,586 31,250 32,000 69,836 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 2,230,820 1,597,600 3,383,286 445,134 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 2,562,524 1,604,020 3,872,301 294,243 127 G I FTS CATALOG F U N D 295,225 109,800 119,670 285,355 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 212,775 182,560 194,977 200,358 136 PARKSTRUST FUND 160,616 4,870 5,000 160,486 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUSTFD 985,657 44,500 - 1,030,157 138 SISTER CITYCOMMISSION 8,102 10,240 10,500 7,842 211 LID FUND CONTROL 12 35,887 35,887 12 231 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVICE FUND - 716,420 716,410 10 332 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 2,209,541 6,671,593 4,083,372 4,797,762 421 WATER 21,205,813 10,473,626 12,945,605 18,733,834 422 STORM 11,913,622 5,461,148 10,025,032 7,349,738 423 SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT 45,890,096 14,386,296 17,733,414 42,542,978 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 843,961 1,995,280 1,991,210 848,031 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 9,552,483 1,763,760 2,935,121 8,381,122 512 Technology Renta I Fund 623,458 1,101,798 1,200,801 524,455 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 1 217,698 1 72,040 1 145,423 1 144,315 Tota Is 121,025,424 102,760,774 120,158,672 103,627,526 C d E C d E Q r N i3f 3 m Cn T- 0 N N R 3 CY t r L 3 O LL d U C O C :a L O C O E a N E Q d 3 m L R 7 CY t r C N E t U r Q Packet Pg. 317 9.5.b EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (December 2019) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION Adopted Budget Ord. #4136 1/1/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4144 2/20/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4148 4/24/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4156 7/24/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4161 10/15/2019 Proposed Amendment Ord. # 1212019 2019 Amended Revenue Budget 001 General Fund $ 40,774,939 $ $ 91,255 $ 4,767,350 $ 55,061 $ $ 45,688,60` 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 437,980 - - 437,98( 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 28,210 - 28,21( 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 182,400 35,887 218,28; 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,230 - 5,23( 016 Building Maintenance Fund - 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund 556,800 556,80( 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund - 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund - 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 165,430 165,43( 111 Street Fund 1,859,270 1,859,27( 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 6,646,917 295,366 197,650 - 119,000 7,258,93: 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 150,910 - - 1,737 - 152,64, 118 Memorial Street Tree 580 - 58( 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 94,730 3,534 98,26' 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,170 - 26,17( 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,680 1,68( 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 31,250 31,25( 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 1,597,600 1,597,60( 126 Special Capital Fund 1,604,020 - - - 1,604,02( 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 82,100 6,000 9,700 12,000 109,80( 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 182,560 - - - 182,56( 136 Parks Trust Fund 4,870 4,87( 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd 44,500 44,50( 138 Sister City Commission 10,240 - 10,24( 211 Lid Fund Control 12,400 23,487 35,88; 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 716,420 - - - 716,42( 332 Parks Construction 2,796,849 88,800 3,785,944 6,671,59: 421 Water 10,473,626 - - 10,473,62E 422 Storm 5,461,148 5,461,14E 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 14,386,296 14,386,29E 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,995,280 1,995,28( 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,763,760 1,763,76( 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,101,798 1,101,79E 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 72,040 72,04( Totals 1 $ 93,268,003 1 $ 384,166 1 $ 294,905 1 $ 4,782,321 1 $ 114,435 1 $ 3,916,944 1 $ 102,760,77' C d E C d E Q d 3 m O O N L d r- O M CY t 3 O LL d t� C C L O C O E C O E a r� d 7 m L N M 7 CY t C N E t t� O r Q Packet Pg. 318 9.5.b EXHIBIT "C": Budget Amendments by Expenditure (December 2019) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION Adopted Budget Ord. #4136 1/1/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4144 2/20/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4148 4/24/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4156 7/17/2019 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4161 10/15/2019 Proposed Amendment Ord. # 1212019 2019 Amended Expenditure Budget 001 General Fund $ 44,364,843 $ 707,366 $ 224,314 $ 72,594 $ 149,130 $ 105,697 $ 45,623,944 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 444,270 - 22,650 - 466,920 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - 931,523 931,523 012 Contingency Reserve Fund - 3,835,827 3,835,827 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,400 5,800 11,200 016 Building Maintenance Fund - - - 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund - - 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund - 1,862 1,862 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund 200,000 - 200,000 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 45,800 45,800 111 Street Fund 2,234,528 - 17,500 3,470 2,255,498 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 6,399,379 295,366 197,650 143,000 7,035,395 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 181,880 - - - 181,880 118 Memorial Street Tree - - - 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 100,400 8,534 108,934 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 - 26,880 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 3,000 3,000 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 32,000 - - - 32,000 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 2,853,560 465,356 54,370 10,000 3,383,286 126 Special Capital Fund 3,102,850 761,851 7,600 - 3,872,301 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 77,795 - 21,959 9,700 10,216 119,670 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 184,707 10,000 - - 270 194,977 136 Parks Trust Fund 5,000 - - 5,000 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd - - 138 Sister City Commission 10,500 10,500 211 Lid Fund Control 12,400 23,487 35,887 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 716,410 - - - 716,410 332 Parks Construction 3,763,628 233,800 85,944 4,083,372 421 Water 12,229,053 679,942 30,000 - 6,610 12,945,605 422 Storm 9,690,422 304,613 23,000 1,737 5,260 10,025,032 423 Sewer/Treatment Pla nt 17,259,438 462,046 - - 11,930 17,733,414 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,991,210 - - - 1,991,210 511 Equipment Rental Fund 2,408,431 296,000 229,000 1,690 2,935,121 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,048,911 131,000 - - 18,260 2,630 1,200,801 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 78,627 - 58,596 8,200 145,423 Totals $109,471,322 $ 4,347, 440 $ 828,043 $4,936,173 $ 190,877 1 $ 384,917 $120,158,672 C d E C d E Q r N of 7 m On V- 0 N L R 7 CY t L O LL d U C O C :a L O r C O E a N E Q d a� 7 m L R 7 CY t C N E t U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 319 EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendment Summary (December 2019) 9.5.b Fund Number Proposed Amendment Change in Beginning Fund Balance Proposed Amendment Changein Revenue Proposed Amendment Changein Expense Proposed Amendment Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 105,697 (105,697) 111 - 3,470 (3,470) 112 119,000 143,000 (24,000) 127 12,000 10,216 1,784 130 270 (270) 332 3,785,944 85,944 3,700,000 421 6,610 (6,610) 422 5,260 (5,260) 423 11,930 (11,930) 511 1,690 (1,690) 512 2,630 (2,630) 617 - 8,200 (8,200) Total Change 3,916,944 384,917 3,532,027 C d E C d E Q N of 3 m M V- 0 N N R 3 CY t r L 0 U L O r E E Q M� W L L /may V L E t U 2 Q Packet Pg. 320 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/3/2019 Deliberation and Adoption of the 2020 City Budget Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott James Background/History Mayor Earling presented his Proposed 2020 Budget to Council on October 8, 2019. The Proposed 2020 Budget can be accessed on the City's website at: file:///C:/Users/sjames/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/2R24WD6N/2020_City_of_Ed monds_Proposed_Budget.pdf Staff Recommendation Recommended steps for Council Action: 1) Hear Councilmember rational for the final amendments to the Proposed 2020 Budget. 2) Vote on Proposed Amendments: Each Councilmember submitting an amendment should make a motion to approve their respective amendments. 3) Motion to approve 2020 Budget: Motion to approve Ordinance No. XXXX, adopting the 2020 Budget as amended to commence January 1, 2020. Narrative Tonight's Council Meeting is scheduled for Council to continue their deliberation on the Proposed 2020 Budget, vote on amendments to the Proposed Budget and adopt the 2020 Budget as amended. The following is a suggested process to keep the 2020 Budget adoption moving forward: 1) Since the November 26th Council Meeting, three changes were made to the Council Proposed 2020 Budget Amendments. Specifically, Item #9 was withdrawn and items #22 and #23 were added. Councilmembers submitting these two amendments will be asked to share their respective rationale's for these two amendment. The complete list of Council and staff amendments submitted are attached. 2) Next, Mayor to start the Council voting on the proposed amendments. 3) The Councilmember submitting the proposed amendment should offer a motion to approve their amendment. 4) Council to make motion to approve Ordinance No. XXXX, adopting the 2020 Budget as amended to commence January 1, 2020. Attachments: Proposed Amendments for December 3rd Council Meeting 2020 Budget Ordinance and Use of Tax Funds Report Packet Pg. 321 10.1.a COUNCIL PROPOSED 2020 BUDGET AMENDMENTS Item # Page # DP# New Item' Description Cash Increase (Decrease) Submitter Approved? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DP #2 DP #3 DP #10 DP #13 DP #29 DP #30 DP #33 DP #37 13P #40 DP #42 DP #51 DP #52 Page #57 DP #80 DP #80 DP #81 DP #81 New New New New DP #40 New Remove New Half-time Human Services Coordinator Change City Attorney increase from 4% to 3% Move Health District contribution to Opioid Response Fund Remove Contribution to Edmonds Center for the Arts Remove Purchase of new Staff Vehicle for Police Dept. Remove Federal Lobbyist Remove Community Survey Remove Downtown Wayfaring Signs Rear-t39iOp-, -P-r-p-�ssion lvianvvcsi ,- Code Updates tes Remove/Change Construction Review Consultant Remove Public Art at the Library Reduce expenses so that Expenses = Revenue for this DP Add $7,500 for Students Saving Salmon, to total $12,500 Remove Willow Creek Daylighting Design Reduce DP from $750,000 to $450,000 Remove Marsh Restoration Consultant Move Marsh Restoration Consultant from Stone to Parks Add Full-time Arborist, truck & equipment Add Non -represented Employee Salary Study Add Contribution Support for Edmonds Chamber Add budget for consultant to review uses of all City rental space Increase budget for Professional Services for Code Updates Add 0.5 FTE staff member to update the City's development code Total of Councilme mbe r Requested Changes $63,814 Teitzel, Johnson $5,745 Johnson $0 Teitzel $75,000 Johnson $35,000 Johnson $72,000 Johnson, Buckshnis $25,000 Johnson $25,000 Johnson 25,000 Tibbott $60,000 Tibbott $62,000 Johnson $400 Johnson ($7,500) Buckshnis $750,000 Teitzel $300,000 Buckshnis $25,000 Buckshnis $0 Buckshnis ($79,715) Buckshnis ($40,000) Mesaros ($10,000) Mesaros ($15,000) Johnson ($25,000) Tibbott ($72,120) Buckshnis 1,249,624 Withdrawn 1"Page #" refers to page number in the Proposed 2020 Budget book where the reference item can be found, and "DP#" refers to the 2020 Decision Package number and "New Item" refers to a new budget request being submitted for Council consideration. Packet Pg. 322 10.1.a STAFF PROPOSED 2020 BUDGET AMENDMENTS Page # DP# Cash Increase Item # New Items Description (Decrease) Submitter Approved? 1 DP #2 Correct Half-time Human Services Coordinator Costs $21,636 Doherty 2 DP #35 Adjust Purchase of Trolley & Operation of Service ($5,000) Doherty 3 DP #86 Remove DP for Stormwater Comprehensive Plan $152,500 Williams 4 DP #92 Reduce request from $635,000 to $135,000 $500,000 Williams 5 Page #57 Add $2,500 for Students Saving Salmon, to total $5,000 ($2,500) James 6 New Add PUD Green Power Program ($30,000) Hope 7 New 4% increase for Public Defender for 1 st half of 2020 ($6,312) Neill Hoyson Total of Staff Requested Changes 630,324 1"Page #" refers to page number in the Proposed 2020 Budget book where the reference item can be found, and "DP#" refers to the 2020 Decision Package number and "New Item" refers to anew budget request being submitted for Council consideration. Packet Pg. 323 10.1.b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2020 AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, on or before the first business day in the third month prior to the beginning of the fiscal year of 2020, the Finance Director submitted to the Mayor the estimates of revenues and expenditures for the next fiscal year as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor reviewed the estimates and made such revisions and/or additions as deemed advisable and prior to sixty days before January 1, 2020, filed the said revised preliminary budget with the City Clerk together with a budget message, as recommendation for the final budget, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk provided sufficient copies of such preliminary budget and budget message to meet the reasonable demands of taxpayers therefore and published and posted notice of filing and the availability of said preliminary budget together with the date of a public hearing for the purpose of fixing a final budget, all as required by the law, and WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled hearings on the preliminary budget for the purpose of providing information regarding estimates and programs, and WHEREAS, the City Council did meet on November 4th, 2019 which was on or before the first Monday of the month next preceding the beginning of the ensuing fiscal year, for the purpose of fixing a final budget at which hearing all taxpayers were heard who appeared for or against any part of said budget, and Packet Pg. 324 10.1.b WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing the City Council made such adoptions and changes as it deemed necessary and proper, WHEREAS, the Finance Director submitted the Use of Tax Funds Report to Mayor and Council as required by RCW 82.46.015, NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Attached hereto and identified as Exhibit A, in summary form, are the totals of estimated revenues and appropriations for each separate fund and the aggregate totals for all such funds combined, and by this reference said Exhibit A is incorporated herein as if set forth in full and the same is hereby adopted in full. The Finance Director is authorized to update year-end fund balances in the final budget document as projected prior to printing the final budget document. Section 2. A complete copy of the final budget for 2020, as adopted, together with a copy of this adopting ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporations of the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 3. Attached hereto and identified as Exhibit B, Use of Tax Funds Report, and by this reference said Exhibit B is incorporated herein as if set forth in full and the same is hereby adopted in full. The Finance Director is authorized to update actual expenditures in the final report as projected prior to printing the final report document. Packet Pg. 325 10.1.b Section 4. This ordinance is a legislative act delegated by statute to the City Council of the City of Edmonds, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect January 1, 2020. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVID O. EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: 1 CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 326 10.1.b SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 327 10.1.b EXHIBIT "A" 2020 BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND Fund No. Fund Description Revenue Expenditure Difference (Rev - Exp) * 001 General Fund $ 43,857,108 $ 48,176,108 $ (4,319,000) 009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve Subfund 437,980 467,140 (29,160) 012 Contingency Reserve Subfund 56,140 - 56,140 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,230 5,900 (670) 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 165,390 45,800 119,590 111 Street Fund 1,893,668 2,132,529 (238,861) 112 Street Construction Fund 2,433,890 2,398,235 35,655 117 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 259,635 243,880 15,755 118 Memorial Tree Fund 750 - 750 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 98,630 122,750 (24,120) 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 27,270 26,880 390 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,790 3,000 (1,210) 123 Tourism Promotional Arts Fund 34,450 33,900 550 125 REET 2 1,436,090 3,067,616 (1,631,526) 126 REET 1 1,453,520 2,661,040 (1,207,520) 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 145,050 100,220 44,830 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Imp. Fund 184,610 195,700 (11,090) 136 Parks Trust Fund 6,390 - 6,390 137 Cemetery Maintenance Fund 54,210 - 54,210 138 Sister City Commission Fund 10,380 11,900 (1,520) 211 LID Control Fund 12,400 12,400 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund 738,400 738,400 332 Parks Capital Construction Fund 9,638,306 11,942,630 (2,304,324) 421 Water UtilityFund 11,116,270 12,785,339 (1,669,069) 422 Storm Utility Fund 5,670,766 8,809,350 (3,138,584) 423 Sewer/WWTPUtility Fund 24,452,726 30,984,800 (6,532,074) 424 Utility Debt Service Fund 1,988,100 1,988,130 (30) 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,746,160 3,169,898 (1,423,738) 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,202,963 1,224,784 (21,821) 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 72,620 78,700 (6,080) Totals $ 109,200,892 $ 131,427,029 $ (22,226,137) * Amount represents a contribution of (use of) fund balance Q Packet Pg. 328 10.1.b EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING STREET EXPENDITURES 2018 % of Project using REET 2019 Estimate % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 2018 Overlay Program 448,409 27% 2019 Overlay Program 24,222 25% 238th Island & Misc Ramps 10,812 51% 2019 Pavement Preservation Program 506,386 30% 238th Island and ADA Curb Ramps 150,750 41% 238th St. SW Walkwayfrom SR-104 to SR-99 Project 3,004 61% Audible Pedestrian Signals 42,500 100% Traffic Calming 4,877 25% REET 1 - Fund 126 Sunset Walkway Improvement 135 31 % Trackside Warning System 68,418 80% Dayton St. Utility Replacement 29,095 13% 238th St. Walkway SR104 to Hwy 99 2,041 0.41 % 2017 Overlay Program 953 100% 89th PI W Retaining Wall 224 1 2% 2018 Traffic Calming 15,123 50% 2018 Overlay Program 895,372 55% 84th Overlay from 220th to 212th 8,727 12% 2019 Overlay Program 48,309 51% 2019 Pavement Preservation Program 565,641 33% 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program 1 50,000 100% 238th St. SW Walkwayfrom SR-104 to SR-99 Project 1,912 39% 84th Ave W Overlay-220th to 212th Project 108,495 14% 89th Retaining Wall 127,990 100% Adaptive system along 220th 47,000 100% Admiral Way Crossing 40,000 100% Dayton 3rd to 9th 12,058 100% Guardrail installations 20,000 100% Protected/Permissive Left Turn 14,762 100% Trackside Warning 320,149 100% Traffic Signal Upgrades 70,000 100% Packet Pg. 329 10.1.b EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING PARKS EXPENDITURES 2018 % of Project using REET 2019 Estimate % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 Civic Center Property 79,229 100% Yost Pool Improvements 53,440 100% Waterfront Redevelopment/Ebb tide walkway 215,858 98% City Park Shed 137,620 98% Frances Anderson Playground 150,188 100% Civic Development 259,616 100% Edmonds Marsh Project 25,000 100% Gateway Sign Replacements 8,976 100% Parks Maintenance 78,716 6% Hickman Slope Management 9,323 100% 4th Ave Corridor 50,000 100% Accessible Playgrounds 89,908 100% City Park Walkway 40,000 100% Gateway Sign 20,000 100% Marsh Feasibility 25,000 100% Mathy Ballinger Park 20,000 100% Olympic Beach Restrooms 35,000 19% Parks Maintenance R & M 50,000 100% Parks Maintenance Shop 20,000 100% Parks Maintenance Supplies 21,000 100% Seaview Park 120,000 100% SewAew Park 41,800 100% Veteran's Plaza 7,400 100% Waterfront Redevelopment 709,900 30% Yost Pool 67,921 100% REET 1 - Fund 126 CDBG Repayment to Senior Center 216,720 100% Debt Service 162,047 100% Civic Park 500,000 93% Debt Interest 3,360 100% Debt Principal 23,480 100% Interfund Transfer Out for Debt Payment 133,030 100% Waterfront Redevelopment 526,733 22% Packet Pg. 330 10.1.b EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 2: Use of REET Funds for the succeeding two-year period and Percentage of REET Funds for capital projects Compared to all other sources of capital project funding as Identified in City's Capital Facilities Plan. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2019 2020 Total % of Funding Hwy 99 Gateway/ Revitalization 918,000 500,000) (1,418,000 Federal or State Grants Secured $628,000 $500,000 1,128,000 80% Federal or State Grants (Unsecured) - - - 0% Fund 126 Reimbursement - for Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization 290,000 290,000 20% Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization $ - $ $ - 100% 238th St SW from SR-104 to Hwy 99 (5,750) (5,750) Federal or State Grants Secured 4,000 4,000 70% Fund 126 Reimbursement 1,750 1,750 30% 238th St SW from SR-104 to Hwy 99 $ - $ $ - 100% Dayton St from 3rd Ave to 9th Ave 252,500 252,500 Federal or State Grants (Unsecured) 250,000 250,000 99% Fund 126 Reimbursement 2,500 2,500 1 % Dayton St from 3rd Ave to 9th Ave $ - $ $ - 100% PARKS PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2019 2020 Total % of Fundingi Civic Center Development 12,000,170 12,000,170 G.O. Bonds 3,334,185 3,334,185 28% General Fund 2,000,000 2,000,000 17% Grants 4,350,000 4,350,000 36% Fund 125 Reimbursement 1,815,985 1,815,985 15% Park Impact Fees 500,000 1 500,000 1 4% Civic Center Acquisition/Development/Stadium demo $ $ $ - 100% Waterfront Redevelopment/ Waterfront Walkway Completion 4,298,266 1,591,033 5,889,299 Fund 125 Reimbursement- Waterfront development 1,139,398 841,033 1,980,431 34% Grants 1,125,000 750,000 1,875,000 32% Park Impact Fees/Waterfront development 1,100,000 1,100,000 19% Private Partnership 933,868 933,868 16% Waterfront Redevelopment / Waterfront Walkway Completion $ - $ - $ - 100% Packet Pg. 331