2020-07-28 City Council - Full Agenda-2629o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE,
HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA
98020
J U LY 28, 2020, 7:00 PM
CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PORTION OF THE
MEETING MAY CONNECT VIA ZOOM AT ANY POINT BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE AUDIENCE
COMMENT PERIOD. CITIZENS WILL SIT IN A VIRTUAL WAITING ROOM UNTIL THEIR TURN TO
SPEAK. WHEN THE CITIZEN ENTERS THE LIVE COUNCIL MEETING, THEIR TIME WILL BEGIN. THE
CLERK WILL BE THE TIME KEEPER AND PROVIDE A 30-SECOND WARNING AND A FINAL WARNING
WHEN THEIR TIME IS UP. THE CITIZEN WILL BE REMOVED AND THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL BE
ALLOWED IN.
CITIZENS MAY CONNECT WITH A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE AT:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/S/4257752525
OR JOIN THE MEETING BY PHONE AT:
888 475 4499 (TOLL FREE) OR 877 853 5257 (TOLL FREE) MEETING ID 425 775 2525
CITIZENS NOT WISHING TO PARTICIPATE IN AUDIENCE COMMENTS MAY CONTINUE TO MONITOR
THE LIVESTREAM ON THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, CABLE TV, OR TELEPHONE BY
CALLING (712) 775-7270, ACCESS CODE 583224.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525)
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 28, 2020
Page 1
1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 21, 2020
2. Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
3. Proposal to extend the Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
4. June 2020 Quarterly Financial Report
7. JOINT MEETING
1. Joint Meeting with the Planning Board (30 min)
8. ACTION ITEMS
1. Proposed Amendment to ECC 2.10.010 for Council review of appointive positions (20 min)
2. 2021-2026 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (20 min)
3. Approval of Sound Transit Funding Agreement for Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project (30
min)
9. STUDY ITEMS
1. Review of Council Code of Conduct (45 min)
2. Ordinance updating the City's Fireworks Code (15 min)
10. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMTTEE MEETINGS
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 28, 2020
Page 2
6.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 21, 2020
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
07-21-2020 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 3
6.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
July 21, 2020
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Jessica Neill-Hoyson, HR Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Jamie Holter, Public Info. Ofc./Comm. Strategist
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Leif Bjorback, Building Official
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The
meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original
inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who
since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their
sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land
and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present participating remotely with the
exception of Council President Fraley-Monillas.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 6.10, Extension of Interim Chief of Police, be moved to Item
9.2
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
6.1.a
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS:HZOOM.US/S/4257752525)
Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments.
Jeffrey Schonbrun, Edmonds, referred to the transportation plan, specifically line items 10 and 16 in the
safety and capacity section of the plan, advising that both are related to improvement for safety and capacity
to intersections on 220' street. Observing his comments were related to the public hearing, Mayor Nelson
requested he delay his comments until the public hearing on the Transportation Improvement Program,
Item 7.2.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmonds.wa.gov are attached)
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Olson raised a point of order, whether the Consent Agenda needed to be approved as
amended as an item was removed. City Clerk Scott Passey said the motion can be to approve the Consent
Agenda as the Council was aware an item had been previously removed.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 23, 2020
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 14, 2020
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 14, 2020
4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND
WIRE PAYMENTS
5. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH
FLOW TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE CITYWIDE CIPP SEWER REHAB PHASE II
PROJECT
6. RELEASE OF UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
7. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
SCJ FOR THE HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT
8. ORDINANCE AMENDING RESIDENTIAL PARKING ZONE REGULATIONS
9. ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 1.03 RELATED TO POSTING AND PUBLICATION OF
NOTICES
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS (HTTP://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525)
OPTIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVAL OF SOUND TRANSIT FUNDING
AGREEMENT FOR CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss reviewed:
• Introduction
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 2
Packet Pg. 5
6.1.a
0 2017: Edmonds, Mount Lake Terrace, and Lynnwood added bike lanes throughout the
transportation system (through Bike-2-Health Secured Grant) with focus on north / central part
of Edmonds (— 7 Miles of bike lanes in Edmonds).
0 2019: Sound Transit had a call for projects with the intent to improve active transportation
access to their Sound Transit Stations (MLT Transit Station & Edmonds Station)
o City secured $1.85 Million in grant funding(100% Sound Transit access grant / no local match).
o All stretches identified in 2015 Transportation Plan (adopted by Council in 2015)
o Proposed bike improvements with focus on south side and central part of Edmonds
■ 100t'Ave W / 9t'Ave N
■ Bowdoin Way
■ 228th St SW and
■ 80t' Ave W
Project description — Map of citywide bicycle improvements (1 mile, % mile, '/4 mile of Edmonds
Transit Center and Mountlake Terrace Transit Center)
o Proposed sharrows
o Proposed bike lane
o Existing sharrows
o Existing bike lane
o Existing bike path
Cross sections
o 100t' Ave W from 238t' St. SW to north of SR-104
■ Existing conditions with 2 travel lanes in each direction
■ Striping -only proposed section
■ Road diet (one lane in each direction with 2-way left turn lane and bike lanes)
*Sections within signalized intersections (such as SR-104 @100' Ave W) to be reevaluated
during design phase*
Results from recent/similar conversion along 76" Ave. W from 220t" to 212t"
o Average daily traffic (ADT)
■ 76' Ave.: 11,500 vehicles per day
■ 100' Ave. W (south of SR-104): 9,000 vehicles per day
■ 100' Ave W (north of SR-104): 5,000 vehicles per day
o Safety improvements for entire transportation system
■ Bike lanes (cyclist with own facility)
■ Vehicle speed reductions (traffic calming) with more consistent pace (speeding on -going
issues along 100' Ave W)
■ Safer corridor due to reduction of lane changes when going around left turning vehicles
■ No increase in travel time;
■ Pedestrians improvements => bike lanes provide separation between vehicles and
pedestrians
■ Supports complete streets
Existing cross section along 100' from SR-104 to Walnut St & Bowdoin Way from 100t" to 84t"
o Proposed conditions along 100t" and Bowdoin with bike lanes on both side of street / parking
on one side (parking alternating from one side of street to other)
o Proposed conditions with one travel lane in each direction, a two-way left turn lane and bike
lanes on both sides (with very low parking demand)
Bike accident summary (pre / post Bike-2-Health project)
o (8) Minor injury cyclist collisions between 2012 —2017 (prior to completion of Bike-2-Health
Proj ect)
■ (2) along 212' St. SW between 72nd Ave. W and 84' Ave. W
■ (6) Along 76' Ave. W between 220' St. SW And OVD
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 3
Packet Pg. 6
6.1.a
- Cyclist hit by vehicle while riding on sidewalk => due to limited sight distance with
fences/vegetation
- Cyclist impact with open door of parked car
- Cyclist going through hit turning vehicle
o (0) Minor injury cyclist collisions between 2017 -2019 (after completion of Bike-2-Health
project)
■ With increase in cyclist activity along those streets
Bike accidents along proposed stretches between 2015 and 2019
o (4) Bike collisions along 100th Ave. W stretch and (1) along 228' St. SW stretch
■ Cyclist hit while riding in sidewalk due to limited sight distance
■ Cyclists hit while going through by turning vehicle
Parking Study along 100' St. SW
o 100th Ave. S stretch (1.2 mile)
■ Parked cars on east side of street
- 3 (weekday early morning) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
- 6 (weekday mid -afternoon) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
- 6 (weekend morning) =>less 5% of total parking stalls
■ Parked cars on west side of street
- 7 (weekday early morning) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
- 9 (weekday mid -afternoon) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
- 6 (weekend morning) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
Parking study along Bowdoin Way
o Bowdoin way stretch (1.1 mile)
■ Parked cars on north side of street
- 12 (weekday early morning)=>less 5% of total parking stalls
- 16 (weekday mid -afternoon)=> less 5% of total parking stalls
- 10 (weekday morning) _> less 5% of total parking stalls
■ Parked cars on south side of street
5 (weekday early morning)=>less 5% of total parking stalls
4 (weekday mid-afternoon)=>less 5% of total parking stalls
7 (weekday morning) =>less 5% of total parking stalls
Bike Counts Information
o Graph of Total Bike Count Data
■ April 2016, August 2016, June 2017, October 2017, April 2019, July 2019, September
2019, December 2019
■ 76' Ave W & OVD
■ 9' Ave S & Walnut St
■ 76th Ave W & 212th St SW
o Based on pre -post bike lane installation studies (cities of various sizes), the increase in bike
activity has ranged from 50% to 400%
■ Seattle: generated 400% increase in bike activity following addition of bike lanes along
various corridors several years ago
Project Schedule
o Design phase
■ Consultant selection process August 2020
■ Start design September 2020
■ Completion of design December 2021
o Construction phase
■ Start of construction April 2022
■ Completion of construction December 2022
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 4
Packet Pg. 7
6.1.a
Note: If ROW phase is needed for roadway widening, construction could be pushed back one
year
Support from other agencies
o Edmonds Bicycle Advocacy Group (EBAG)
o Cascade Bicycle Advocacy
o City of Shoreline
o City of Lynnwood
o City of Mountlake Terrace
o Community Transit
o Edmonds School District
• Conclusion
o Approval of Sound Transit Agreement
o Q&A/ Public hearing
Councilmember Distelhorst referred to the City of Edmonds Resolution 1389 in support of the Paris Climate
Accord that mentioned adopting policies and programs that promote the long-term goal of greenhouse gas
emission reduction. He asked if multi -modal transportation that does not rely on the burning of fossil fuels
helps to contribute to that goal. Mr. Bertrand answered yes. Councilmember Distelhorst commented on the
environmental benefits of promoting that type of transportation.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the parking study on 100th and less than 5% early morning, and asked
what period of time was studied and how the parameters were defined. Mr. Hauss answered it was done a
couple weeks ago. Councilmember Buckshnis observed that was during COVID. Mr. Hauss explained no
parking study had been done in the past, but when 10011i and Bowdoin were observed many times in the
past, the results of low demand were almost exactly the same. He agreed the count was done during COVID
when a lot of people are at home, especially on the weekends, which is consistent with the counts obtained
on weekdays. He anticipated there would be less cars mid -afternoon on weekdays if the count were done
pre or post COVID.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she was referring to Westgate and 100t1i and employee parking in that area
for PCC, QFC, Goodwill and the thrift store. She feared the counts done during COVID were not as accurate
as she has observed parking that exceeds 5%. Goodwill and the thrift store have reopened now. Her biggest
concern was the 100' /9th corridor. Mr. Hauss said another parking study will be done during the design
phase to confirm the previous counts. There are alternatives for areas with heavy parking demand, such as
maintaining parking on one side while adding bike lanes.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the bike count that showed 140 bicyclists at 9t' & Walnut and asked
what timeframe that represented. Mr. Hauss said the counts were done over a 3 day period mid -week
(Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday). The counts were done with cameras during the 7-9 a.m. peak hours and
4-6 p.m. peak so 4 hours/day for 3 days for a total of 12 hours. He noted on 76t' Ave W & Olympic View
Drive there were approximately 65 bikes between those 8 hours. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if it
would 65 divided by 3 or about 20 bicyclists/day. Mr. Hauss agreed that would be the number per day, he
was talking about per hour. Public Works Director Phil Williams said the bike counts were for 4 hours/day
but metrics can be applied to expand it and guess what the 24 hour count would be, certainly a great deal
more than 20. He clarified it was not 20 bicycles per day, it was 20 during those 4 hours.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if there was any information on the COVID influenced changes in biking
and any indication that some of the increase may be more permanent. Mr. Hauss said he did not have any
specific information to share. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the less than 5% on 100th Ave & 9th
Ave, explaining she drove that area numerous times a day prior to COVID and the only time she witnessed
a lot of parking was when there was a large funeral or rally happening around PCC. She asked whether the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 5
Packet Pg. 8
6.1.a
parking for a larger funeral could be accommodated. Mr. Hauss said the updated parking study will
determine where those high parking demands are. Parking for funerals can occur on cross street north of
the cemetery and there is parking inside the cemetery. The alternatives could retain parking on the west
side of the street in front of the cemetery where there is high parking demand.
Councilmember Paine said she was most concerned about bike safety along 1001h and going across SR-104
which is a very serious intersection. She thanked staff for the response to her email about whether speeds
need to be reduced northbound on 100', noting drivers fly down the hill next to Firdale Village and keep
traveling at a fast pace into the intersection at SR-104. She thought she saw a 35 mph speed limit sign at
the top of the hill. Drivers also speed up SR-104 after leaving the ferry and do not abide by the speed limits.
She questioned how the safety of any bicyclist could be ensured.
Councilmember Paine said another issue when traveling northbound on 1001h is left turns and driveways.
She has ridden a bike in that area and it is terrifying. She asked whether this was the best design for bicycle
safety. She had similar questions for 76' Ave W where there are school and hospital zones which should
be 20 mph but aren't. One of her biggest questions was whether this design was the best for bicyclist safety.
Mr. Williams responded it has not yet been designed; there is a basic concept of a road diet with a three
lane section, but that can be adjusted in areas with more intense development and greater parking needs and
the designers will do their best to accommodate that during design. With regard to left turns and driveways,
that is exactly the situation that will be addressed with the 3-lane section. The current configuration and
people making left turns, even without bicycles, is dangerous for vehicles and pedestrians. When a driver
on the inside lane stops to make a left turn, there are a lot of rear -end accidents and drivers making
aggressive movements at the last minute to avoid the vehicle stopped for a left turn which creates other
types of accidents and dangers. The three lane road diet is ideal in a circumstance where there are a lot of
driveways or other access points in a commercial area. With regard to speed, he believed the speed limit
was 30 mph on that stretch although that doesn't mean people do not travel 35 mph. That is the same posted
speed limit on 76t1i where there was a road diet which has gotten rave reviews.
Councilmember Paine said her greatest concern was a car versus car left turn accident which is very
different from car versus bicyclist. She anticipated there will be parking impacts particularly on 100'
because that parking is intermittently very well used on Veterans Day, Memorial Day, etc. at the cemetery.
She used to live on 14' Street SW, one street away from the cemetery, and her street was sometimes packed
with parking. The cemetery is a well -loved spot on particular occasions and all of its uses would never be
captured in a parking study snapshot. Mr. Williams agreed there are events that happen a few times a year
that create additional parking need; it is perfectly legal for bicycles to be in the travel lane. The goal is to
put in the best design that provides the most safety most of the time. He agreed there were times when it
may be less safe, but that was the balance in designing transportation infrastructure; you cannot design for
the worst possible case, otherwise roads would be twice as wide.
Councilmember Paine asked if consideration would be given to slowing driver speeds on SR-104. Mr.
Williams agreed drivers leaving the ferry are usually in a hurry. There is a signal at SR-104 & 100t1i and
similar to cross -traffic vehicles, bicyclist wait until their dedicated phase to cross at which point the traffic
on SR-104 is stopped. Mr. Hauss said another benefit of the 2-way left turn lane is currently vehicles have
to cross 2 lanes of traffic in the opposing direction, with a 2-way left turn lane, drivers only have to cross
one lane. Councilmember Paine pointed out drivers would also have to cross the bike lane. Mr. Hauss said
currently left -turning vehicles have watch for traffic in 2 lanes plus watch for bikes; with the 2-way left
turn lane, they only have to watch for one vehicle and one bike. Councilmember Paine offered there was
increased risk for bicyclists because they may not see a turning car and it could be challenging for someone
unaware that there is a bike lane.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 6
Packet Pg. 9
6.1.a
Councilmember Olson added her concern to others about the timing of the parking study and ensuring prior
to design, that additional parking studies are conducted that better reflect a more normal scenario. She
pointed out there is a lot of conversation about increasing residential density and one of ways being
considered is potentially changing the zoning and allowing detached ADUs. The City already allows ADUs
but they may become more popular and with ADUs come more drivers and more cars. She suggested the
plans for parking may need to be adjusted to include future residential density instead of current densities.
She added her concern about parking in the PCC/QFC area, commenting the need for parking in that area
is not unusual; rallies have been a daily occurrence lately. She recommended parking in that vicinity be
preserved.
Councilmember Olson directed citizens' attention to the slide with the time of the commute and the
indication that it was unchanged. Most drivers are interested in whether they can get to their destination in
more or less the same amount of time that it took before; if the answer is yes and there is potential for more
people commuting in a more environmentally friendly way, that is a total win. She was excited about the
information in the packet about improved safety in this stretch with these changes. Previously she did not
think it would be a win, but she did now with the reservations she stated. She thanked staff for the packet
and the email/phone conversations she has had with them.
Councilmember K. Johnson expressed support for this project which is very complimentary to the Complete
Streets Program. As part of Transportation element of Comprehensive Plan, implementation is very difficult
so it is good have funding from Sound Transit. She lives in this neighborhood and travels it daily; there is
sufficient right-of-way for these projects on both 100t' and Bowdoin Way and she has observed little
parking other than that congregated toward the shopping areas. In her observation, some people park there
all day because they taking the bus or are working and perhaps other parking options need to be considered
to address those needs.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if instead of 100t' consideration had been given to 95t' which is less busy.
Similar to Councilmembers Paine and Olson, she was worried about the Westgate area. Mr. Hauss answered
a bicycle using the existing bike lanes on 220t' and then southbound on 95t'', would be stuck at SR-104 and
would have to use sidewalks to continue south because 95t' & SR-104 is a T-intersection. The main intent
of this project is to connect to the south end of the City. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with
Councilmember L. Johnson about support for this project because it is good for the community. Her issue
was 13 parking spaces were removed near 5 Corners and she has only heard complaints, there has not been
an increase in bicyclists, and parking is difficult for people eating in that area. She urged caution about
removing parking in congested areas such as Westgate.
Mayor Nelson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing and described the procedures
for participating.
Mike DeLilla, Seattle, Utilities Engineer for the City, said he lives in north Seattle and has worked for the
City for nearly ten years. He is an avid biker and bikes from Seattle to work in Edmonds 1-2 times a week
March through October. During that ten years, he has seen the network grow, but the only place that does
not have bike lanes is Edmonds, specifically the Firdale/100t'' stretch. He still rides in that area but in many
ways it is the most dangerous stretch because a lot of cars try to muscle their way in and as a cyclist, he is
trying to be responsible and stay on the right side. Another issue with riding on 100t'', cyclists ride on the
side where the parking is but every once in a while when encountering a parked car, it is like a game of
chicken to get around a parked car before the car behind slows or does something funny which can be
disconcerting to a cyclist. Bicyclist who use sidewalks tend to be younger kids who are afraid of biking on
the roads and he did not blame them. He does not bike in the wintertime because of the dark and a bike
needs to be lit up like a Christmas tree for drivers to see them. Having a bike lane would go a long way
toward making bicyclists feel safer.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 7
Packet Pg. 10
6.1.a
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, referred to her previous written comments expressing concern with the major
restructuring of 9t' Ave W and 100t' Ave W for the addition of dedicated bike lanes to promote riders to
use Sound Transit stations at Aurora Village and Mountlake Terrace. Because this was one of the only main
arterials to get through Edmonds efficiently north and south for residential, recreation and shopping
commercial purposes, she was concerned this project may impede ease of access on that arterial in the
future. Removing a full lane of traffic to turn in and come out will back up cars going to single family and
multi -family residential, retail, restaurants, and multiple schools. She also expressed concern with
potentially removing parking from both sides of 9` Avenue from Walnut to Westgate. Dedicated bike lane
projects like this in Seattle have had major neighborhood and business blowback after being installed with
almost no public input, resulting in more money to restore sections to their previous configuration. It is
vitally important to allow for a comprehensive discussion with the true stakeholders from the public and
businesses most affected by this project in a much more formal, open and inclusive public engagement
project.
Ms. Dotsch said another issue she has with the project is that certain known data should have been shown
publicly to Council and the community so they can make an educated decision on whether and how to spend
valuable and limited City resources. She previously provided Council with counts she obtained via a public
records request of results before and after bicycle lanes were completed on 76t' and 212th with actual
datapoint comparisons. In 2016 before the dedicated bike lanes were added there were three days of bike
counts on 76' westbound that averaged 5 bicycles a day. The same location with 3 days of bicycle counts
in 2019 after the dedicated bike lanes were completed found an average of 6 bicycles a day. The same 3
day comparison in 2016 with no bike lane to 2019 with a dedicated bike lane on 212t' west bound showed
an average of 1.3 bicyclists in 2016 and 2 in 2019. On 7611i Ave W northbound, the count in 2016 was an
average of 2.6 bicycles and in 2019 with the dedicated bike lane, the average was only 2 bicycles/day. On
212t' eastbound, the count was an average of 3.3 bicyclists a day in 2016 and an average of 2.3 bicyclist in
2019 with a dedicated bike lane. This is critical data to include for this type of major project that has been
previously completed to fully understand whether it achieved the desired outcome before starting a similar
project. She indicated she had much more to say and would be happy to speak with anyone interested in
following up on the topic.
Peter Hallson, Edmonds Bicycle Advocacy Group, said the group has been involved in this process since
the beginning. When Bike-2-Health first started, it was planned, engineered and developed as a bicycle
project to improve health, wellness choices and make bicycling safer as well as to connect riders to
important destinations in Edmonds and South Snohomish County using wayfinding signs marked Bike-2-
Health. The signs' express purpose is to allow people to feel comfortable riding a bike instead of driving.
They see the current proposed improvement plan as a continuation of the Bike-2-Health goals with an
emphasis on bicycle safety, building rider confidence and connecting bicyclist to the headways in a safe
manner using bike lanes and sharrows. Making bicycle riding safer overcomes a major hurdle for many
new cyclists and whatever can be done to improve the potential for safe riding on roads will enhance and
increase the number of people who ride. The way of future is many new riders will show up which is being
seen now; the trend of bicycle purchases and the number of bikes in Edmonds has increased significantly
in the last few months and probably will continue as people find cycling a good way to get around. This is
a very important project which will improve overall safety, give riders more confidence, use of the Bike-2-
Health routes will increase and riders will enjoy a good ride knowing they have safe routes to follow with
bike lanes, sharrows and wayfinding signs. More bikes on the road results in improved safety and fewer
cars on the road. The Edmonds Bicycle Advocacy Group recommends the Citywide Bicycle Improvement
Project proceed as planned.
Steve Kaiser, Edmonds, said his comments are similar to Mr. Hallson's. He cited recent articles that
indicate because of the coronavirus bike sales are up 100-300% depending on the category of bike. There
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 8
Packet Pg. 11
6.1.a
is much more interest in biking and he envisioned a rising tide effect due to the number of people who have
purchased bikes in the past 4-5 months. To get ahead of the curve, it makes sense to prepare and have more
bike lanes available. Bike safety is the number one concern, people are afraid to mix in with cars which is
the number one reason people do not ride their bikes on the streets. He supported the plan and was
encouraged by the active interest illustrated by the questions posed and looked forward to the project
progressing.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the optional public hearing.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked everyone that commented. Her issue is a parking study done during
COVID was not realistic to what is going on. She did not have a problem with any of the areas other than
Westgate and preferred to consider alternatives for that area. She questioned whether Edmonds is a bicycle
city; she sees more people walking and running and she would rather spend money on sidewalks. She lives
on Olympic View Drive and she has not seen an increase in bicycles on that main street. She referred to the
adage, if we build it they will come, stating she did not know if that will happen. She recalled Portland's
former Mayor Sam Adams who put in bicycle amenities and it floundered, even in an area like Portland
that is known for bicycling. She was in support of this but was concerned about the Westgate area.
Councilmember Olson was curious why the numbers shared by Michelle Dotsch that she received via a
public records request regarding bicycle usage before and after the project on 701' were different than the
presentation. Mr. Williams said he did not know off the top of his head, but those numbers sounded really
low and he did not think they were number of bicyclists per day, but could be during a peak hour or
something similar. He suggested Ms. Dotsch submit that information so staff can ensure it comports with
the information in the presentation.
Councilmember Olson said she was not familiar with term sharrows but after looking it up, she saw the
difference between a sharrow and a bike lane. She asked the advantageous/disadvantage of one or the other
and did the City have option of either one with the funding that has been provided. Mr. Hauss explained
with a sharrow, a bike is in the lane with vehicles; it is a pavement marking that tells the biker where they
should be in the travel lane that's shared with vehicle versus a bike lane where a bicyclist has their own
lane that is not shared with vehicles. Mr. Williams explained sharrows are done when there is not the room
or the money for another option. The sharrow symbol reminds drivers that they will see bicyclist on that
route and should see them where the sharrow markers are located.
Councilmember Distelhorst thanked the public for their comments and echoed the points about safety. He
has ridden all these streets and intersections in the last couple weeks and especially around 1001, 9th, Firdale,
SR-104, it is not a great area to ride. Bikes are in two lanes of traffic and crossing five lanes of traffic at
SR-104 unprotected as a cyclist. Pedestrians on a sidewalk have their own separated, safe space so that is
not a great comparison to a cyclist riding among pickup trucks, large box trucks and cars. In areas where
there are no sidewalks, pedestrians are dodging cars which is the same thing for cyclists riding on arterials.
Maintaining parking as well as accommodating safer cycling and driving and hopefully reducing speed
limits with narrower roads ticks all boxes and will be a great solution for this area.
Councilmember Paine expressed appreciation for all the work everyone has done on this. She agreed
Complete Streets was a great thing to do and suggested adding to bike lanes to Complete Streets. She has
family members who bike in this area, including one who was injured at SR-104 & 100th which is a very
dangerous area. She summarized car versus bike is a terrible thing to happen or contemplate so that was her
main concern.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she has noticed when driving north on 100' Ave vehicles turning into the
former Woodway High School campus or into neighborhoods block traffic and every once in a while a car
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 9
Packet Pg. 12
6.1.a
will decide to zoom around. As someone who recently taught two young drivers, that stands out as
something that has been very challenging. A dedicated turn lane would be a visual reminder as well as a
safer area for drivers in addition to the bike improvements was appealing to her and she supported studying
how that could work in other areas as well.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented because of how this Zoom optional public hearing went, she
suggested this go back to the administration as she felt there needed to be more public engagement such as
an open house where people have more than three minutes to speak. She did not have a problem with areas
other than Westgate. She also suggested obtaining the data Ms. Dotsch provided and have a professional
parking study done "when it is not COVID." She volunteers at the senior center thrift store and volunteers
park along 100t''. That area is busy and she would like to have more data before making a decision.
Mayor Nelson asked if staff expected the Council to take action tonight. Mr. Williams answered after the
public hearing, it would be helpful to have some indication of how the Council wanted to proceed. The
Council could take action tonight or put it on next week's Consent Agenda if additional research was
desired.
Councilmember K. Johnson recalled Mr. Hauss stating that parking studies would be part of the design
phase. Mr. Hauss agreed a more detailed study would be done on both corridors during the design phase to
determine where there is high parking demand. Scenarios would include when there are ceremonies and
funerals at the cemetery. Mr. Williams said it was unknown when COVID will be over and when there will
be more rallies, huge funerals, etc. The available data suggests less than 5% of the available parking spaces
on 100t' are occupied. The problem in the first few 100 feet north of Westgate Village and he was certain
that parking would remain. Staff is committing to designing around that using one of the three options
described for that short section of this long stretch. The parking is not heavy virtually anywhere else in that
stretch. He said that did not mean that the City wouldn't hear from people who like the option to park in
front of their house, but almost all the houses have onsite parking.
With regard to increasing densities, Mr. Williams said new development requires a certain amount of
parking including an ADU. This $1.85 million project is funded by Sound Transit because they see benefit
in it, it is not local funds. If things changed in the future to make this ill-advised, it is primarily a painting
project, re -striping the street throughout the length as well as some possibly some physical modifications
at 220t' and Westgate. He would like to have the Council take action tonight if possible.
Councilmember Buckshnis said just because Sound Transit is paying for it doesn't mean that it's right. Mr
Williams assured that was not what he said.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THIS, BUT WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE THE 100TH STREET SW/9TH AVENUE S
FROM WALNUT STREET TO 244TH STREET SW BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT NEEDS TO
HAVE FURTHER STUDY.
Councilmember Buckshnis explained with her motion, three could go forward and the fourth needed to
have a public open house, engaging employees from PCC, the thrift store, Goodwill, QFC, residents, etc.
such as was done pre-COVID. Mr. Williams pointed out the current situation is COVID, no pre-COVID.
Councilmember K. Johnson reminded that it is the Council's tradition and procedure not to take a vote
immediately after a public hearing but take the time to listen and consider comments and make a decision
at the next meeting.
Councilmember Paine said she would be more comfortable with proceeding as Councilmember K. Johnson
stated.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 10
Packet Pg. 13
6.1.a
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION.
Councilmember Olson echoed Councilmember K. Johnson's suggestion, preferring to wait a week and have
it on the Consent Agenda where a Councilmember could pull it or have it as an action item next week.
Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with having it on the Consent Agenda next week.
COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON, TO PUT APPROVAL OF SOUND TRANSIT FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR
CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
SIGN THE SYSTEM ACCESS PROJECT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ON THE EDMONDS
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA FOR JULY 28, 2020.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she will vote against the motion, preferring to have it as an action item and
to get clarity from people especially in the 5 Corners areas, and because the Council President is not here
tonight. She preferred to have another thorough discussion and look into it more completely.
Councilmember Olson said she was okay either way; she preferred it be an action item because there seems
to be things the Council wants the administration or stakeholders to provide prior to the vote. It if was on
the Consent Agenda, it could be pulled. It would also be helpful during the next week for Public Works to
get input from people in the Westgate area.
Councilmember K. Johnson supported having it as an action item.
COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON,
TO AMEND THE MOTION TO HAVE IT AS ACTION ITEM ON JULY 28, 2020 AS OPPOSED TO
CONSENT.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2021-2026 SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss reviewed:
• Introduction
o Revised Code of Washington (RCW) requires that each city update their TIP by July 1 St
(however, delayed this year due to COVID-19 and no public hearing could be scheduled until
now)
o Document contains all significant transportation projects that a City possibly plans to undertake
in the next six years.
o City of Edmonds policy: TIP financially constrained first (3) years
o Federal Grants, State Grants, and Local funds are programmed as revenue source for TIP
projects.
Construction Projects in 2020
• Annual Street Preservation Project (Project # 1)
o Project Details
■ — 4 lane miles of variable depth overlay along local streets throughout the City
■ (2) curb ramps upgrades (completed by City crews)
o Schedule
■ May 2020 through July 2020
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 11
Packet Pg. 14
6.1.a
o Funding
■ Local funds $1.2 Million
■ Utility Funds $55,000
841 Ave W Overlay (Project #3)
o Project Description
■ 2" overlay of 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
■ Curb ramp upgrades
■ Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at existing crosswalk near
Chase Lake Elementary School
■ Stormwater upgrades
o Schedule
■ Construction completed (summer 2020)
o Funding
■ STP Grant $690,000
■ REET $156,000
■ Utility funds $575,000
Dayton St. Walkway from 7' Ave. S to 8' Ave. S (Project #26 in 2020-2025 TIP)
o Project Description
■ Complete missing sidewalk links (— 250' new sidewalk)
■ Curb ramp upgrades with bulb outs (Dayton St. @ 8r' Ave. S)
■ Incorporate into Dayton St. Utility Improvements project (from 3rdAve. S to 9thAve. S)
■ Priority Project #1 in Short Walkway List from 2015 Transportation Update
o Schedule
■ Construction recently completed
o Funding
■ Complete Streets Program (TIB) —$185,000
Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd Ave S to 4th Ave. S (Project #25 in 2020-2025 TIP)
o Project Description
■ Complete missing sidewalk links (— 150' new sidewalk)
■ Priority Project #3 in Short Walkway List from 2015 Transportation Plan
o Schedule
■ Construction Summer 2020 (completed by PW Concrete Crew)
o Funding
■ Complete Streets Program (TIB)—$65,000 (100% grant funds)
Admiral Way Crosswalk
o Project Description
■ Install mid -block crosswalk along Admiral Way with RRFB's to increase pedestrian safety
o Schedule
■ Construction completed (early 2020)
o Funding
■ Port of Edmonds $19,000
■ Local Funds $19,000
Adaptive System along 220' St. SW
o Project Description
■ Traffic signal coordination along 220thSt. SW from 1-5 off -ramp to 76t' Ave. W to reduce
congestion and improve traffic flow along busy Mountlake Terrace / Edmonds corridor (�
1 mile)
o Schedule
■ Construction Summer / Fall 2020
o Funding
■ HSIP (Federal Grant) $105,000 (90% grant funded)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 12
Packet Pg. 15
6.1.a
Citywide Signal Improvements (Project #4)
o Project Description
■ Install Flashing Yellow Arrow for EB and WB movements at SR-104 @ 226th St. SW to
improve intersection delay and safety
o Schedule
■ Construction Summer 2020
o Funding
■ Local funds -$10'000
Scheduled Construction projects (2021 / 2022)
• Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements (Project #23)
o Project Description
■ Complete Citywide pedestrian crossing enhancements at (9) locations, with the following:
- Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at (7) intersections
- HAWK signal (SR-524 @ 84thAve. W)
- Fully actuated traffic signal (SR-104 @ 232ndSt. SW)
o Schedule
■ Design Spring 2018-July 2020
■ ROW Spring 2019 -April 2020
■ Construction Spring 2021 - Fall 2021
o Funding
■ Federal Grant (Safe Routes to School Program) $1,490,000
■ Local funds (approved as part Of 2019 Budget) $429,000
■ Utility funds $50,000
Citywide Bicycle Improvements project (Project #42)
o Project Description
■ Install bike lanes along key corridors
- 100t'Ave. W / 9th Ave. S from 238th St. SW to Walnut St.;
- Bowdoin Way from 9' Ave. S to 84' Ave. W; and
- 228th St. SW from 78th Ave. to 80th Ave. W.
o Schedule
■ Design 2020/2021
■ ROW (if needed) 2021
■ Construction 2022
o Funding
■ Sound Transit Access grant $1.85 million (100% funds)
Downtown Lighting Improvements
o Project Description
■ Install Lighting Improvements within proximity to Sound Transit Station (such as Dayton
St from Admiral Way to SR-104.
o Schedule
■ Design 2021-2022
■ Construction TBD
o Funding
■ Sound Transit grant (as part of ST-3) $1.5 million
Other projects in 2021-2026 TIP
• Corridor Improvements
0 228th St. SW from Highway 99 to 95t1i Pl. W (Project #1 l)
o SR-99 Revitalization(Initial project / Project #8)
o SR-99 Revitalization/Gateway (Project #9)
Pavement Preservation
o Annual Street Preservation (Project #1)
2021-2024
2020-2023
2024-2026
2021-2026
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 13
Packet Pg. 16
6.1.a
o 76' Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr (Project #2)
2021-2022
Signal Upgrades
o Puget Dr @OVD (Project #5)
2024-2025
0 238th St. SW @ 100th Ave. W (Project #6)
2024-2025
o Main St. @ 3' Ave (Project #7)
2025-2026
Intersection Improvements
0 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW (Project #10)
2021-2025
0 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W (Project #12)
2024-2026
o Main St. @ 9th Ave. (Project #13)
2024-2025
o SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W (Project #20)
2024-2025
o SR-104 @ 238th St. SW (Project #21)
2024-2025
Active Transportation Projects
o Sunset Ave. (Project #22)
2024-2025
0 4thAve. Corridor Enhancement Walkway (Project #36)
2021-2025
o SR-104 @ 76thAve. W Non -Motorized Transp. Impr. (Project #38)
2024-2025
o SR-104 / Pine St. Sidewalk (Project #41)
2021-2023
o Walkway projects within proximity to schools / parks
■ Maplewood Dr. Walkway(Project #25)
2024-2026
■ Elm Way Walkway (Project #26)
2025-2026
■ 80' Ave. Walkway from 212nd St. SW to 20611, St. SW (Prof. #27)
2024-2026
■ 80t' Ave. W Walkway from 188' St to Olympic View Dr. (Proj. #28)
2024-2025
Summary of recently submitted transportation ,grants (,since last TIP)
Project Name
Grant
Phase
Amount
Total
Secured/
Not
Sponsor
Program
Requested
Project
Tentative
Secured/
Response
Cost
TBD
Citywide Bicycle
Sound
Design/
$1,850,000
$1,850,000
Secured
Nov `19
Improvements
Transit
Construction
SR- 104ITS Systems
CMAQ
Design
$287,000
2,174,000
Tentative
Dec `20
Federal
Main St Overlay from 61
STP Federal
Design/
$750,000
$937,500
Tentative
Dec `20
to 81h
Construction
761h Ave W @ 220th St
STP Federal
ROW
$543,000
$8,000,000
Tentative
Dec `20
SW Intersection
Improvements
Hwy 99 Revitalization
STP Federal
Design
$2,248,000
$23,552,000
Not
Dec `20
from 220" to 224th St SW
Secured
Hwy 99 (Raised Median)
HSIP
Construction
$2,000,000
$8,1505000
TBD
Dec `20
DT Lighting
Sound
Design/
$1,500,000
$1,5005000
Tentative
Aug `20
Transit ST3
Construction
228" St SW Corridor from
Sound
Design/
$14,700,000
$14,700,000
Tentative
Aug `20
Hwy 99 to 95th Pl W
Transit ST3
Construction
Pine/SR-104 Walkway
Sound
Design/
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
Tentative
Aug `20
Transit ST3
Construction
2361h St SW Walkway
Ped. &
Design/
$868,000
$1,7375000
TBD
July `21
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave
Bicycle
Construction
W
Program
Maplewood Dr from Main
Ped. &
Design/
$1,073,000
$2,500,000
TBD
July `21
St to 200th St SW
Bicycle
Construction
Program
Elm Way from 8th Ave to
Safe Routes
Design/
$637,000
$830,000
TBD
July `21
9th Ave
to Schools
Construction
80' Ave W from 212' St
Safe Routes
Design/
$1,519,000
$2,692,000
TBD
July `21
SW to 216th St SW
to Schools
Construction
TOTAL
$31,011,000
$71,622,000
• Total grant amount secured/tentative = $22,630,000
• Staff recommendation: City Council approve TIP
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 14
Packet Pg. 17
6.1.a
Councilmember Olson was excited about the adaptive system at 220th & Highway 99. She was also happy
to see Elm Way #26, installing sidewalks in that crazy dangerous place. She was disappointed the TIP did
not include any street lighting in Lake Ballinger which is a very overdue need. She asked staff to weigh in
on that including whether it could be added to the seventh year. She asked whether Public Works keeps
track of where they have placed markers and sandbags in places with street damage. She recalled a side
street off 76' north of 171't where residents indicated while she was doorbelling that they had had sandbags
and markers on a broken part of their street for years. She asked whether that was part of the street
maintenance plan and how repairs are prioritized. Mr. Williams asked if it was on 175th, noting that street
is in pretty poor condition at the lower end. Councilmember Olson answered possibly; it looked like a
landslide under the pavement and the pavement collapsed.
With regard to lighting in Lake Ballinger, Mr. Hauss said he had not heard of that before. Councilmember
Olson answered there are no overhead street lights, it is total dark at night. Mr. Hauss said he will investigate
whether there is a quick solution such as overhead utility lines on PUD poles where streetlights could be
added. Councilmember Olson said the residents would really appreciate it.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. Hauss for the wonderful presentation and for applying for and
obtaining grants. She was concerned with the ST3 funds, there was nothing about a boutique parking
structure or a parking lot. The program includes $1.5 million for street lighting and she asked if that would
include 5G, noting $1.5 million sounds like a tremendous amount of money. Mr. Hauss asked her to repeat
her first question. Councilmember Buckshnis said she thought the ST3 money was for parking so people
will take Sound Transit. She has had to drive downtown because she was unable to find parking after 6:30
a.m. Mr. Hauss answered parking alternatives are being consider including an existing underutilized 40-50
stall parking lot northeast of the Sound Transit station as well as a couple other parking lots. Councilmember
Buckshnis said people will not take the train if they cannot find parking. She questioned why a boutique
parking lot would not work, recalling Sound Transit said it was too expensive, and pointing out it wasn't
any more expensive than the $18.2 million for walkways and lighting.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she was unaware that ST3 money could be used for sidewalks. Mr. Hauss
answered it is mostly sidewalks and parking. The intent of the ST3 package is to improve access to any
mode of transportation including access to Sound Transit stations. Mukilteo has a couple of bike projects.
hi Edmonds, 228t' between Highway 99 and 95t' is the only one that includes bike lanes as part of this
program. Mr. Williams said the 3 projects in Edmonds out of a total of 15 projects and a similar amount on
Mukilteo's list will consume the $40 million, the 3 in Edmonds are either potential purchase or lease of the
property Mr. Hauss outlined and 2 other potential lease opportunities for parking; there is no structured
parking on the project list for Edmonds or Mukilteo.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if structured parking meant boutique parking. Mr. Williams answered it
means a parking structure. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why structured parking was not proposed. Mr.
Williams assumed it was not seen as the most cost effective option for providing parking for the facility.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the City could persuade them differently. Mr. Williams answered
the City has not necessarily tried; he did not recall Council voting to put structured parking for Sound
Transit on the project list. Most of the projects would be led locally but Sound Transit is paying for them.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the listed projects are new and Council has not approved them in the past.
She recalled discussing structured parking but never getting an answer regarding why it was not considered.
There is real estate at the Port where structured parking could easily be built.
Councilmember Paine asked how a pedestrian project such as a sidewalk gets onto this list. There are
sidewalk improvements desperately needed on 5t' Avenue, particularly the NW corner between 5t' and
Walnut where the sidewalks have been lifted by tree roots. She recalled tripping, falling and breaking bones
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 15
Packet Pg. 18
6.1.a
there two years ago. Mr. Williams answered that would be maintenance of an existing sidewalk. Most of
the projects in the CIP are missing pieces of sidewalks or sections of new sidewalk. The concrete crew is
addressing maintenance projects and have a long list of repairs. The crew has also constructed some new
sidewalks as well. There is a lot to do and not much time and the COVID situation has not helped this year.
Mr. Hauss said that area can be added to the list of maintenance projects and they can potentially address
the issue when they have an opportunity. Mr. Williams said he will point it out to them. He explained staff
physically walks the sidewalk system every year with a tablet and marks all the locations, converts it into
GIS, marks the trip hazards with paint, and hires a concrete grinding company to grind lifts. Most of the
lifts can be ground down but really bad ones may require replacement of a panel. The City spends $25,000-
30,000 year to grind down most of the lifts.
Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Mr. Hauss for his presentation and focus on the Complete Streets
ordinance to identify projects for pedestrians, bikes, and vehicles. He also appreciated the work the
department has done securing grant funds which shows the need for transportation projects in Edmonds and
that staff is doing quality, competitive work to receive grants. Since parking structures aren't on the TIP,
he will save his 2000 word parking garage manifesto email for a separate meeting. Sound Transit has
implemented several options to alleviate parking at the station including signing a lease with the United
Methodist Church so there is direct, 2-minute bus service from that parking lot to the Edmonds station. He
expressed interest in considering during design whether the widening projects on 216' and 212t' projects
could include east -west bike connectivity as there are bike lanes in Edmonds and in Lynnwood on 212t'
and he worried about safety riding across a wider intersection to connect to the Interurban. Mr. Hauss agreed
that is a great connection, noting the high cost of that intersection. It is actually a Lynnwood intersection so
the cities will need to work together to submit a grant application in the future.
Councilmember Olson relayed she knows a citizen who owns property in the downtown core who is
interested in a private/public partnership developing it with a parking below and a condo above. She asked
who they should talk to. Mr. Williams answered staff is always willing to talk to people about those ideas;
he suggested starting with Public Works and they could pull in planning and others.
Mayor Nelson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Jeffrey Schonbrun, Edmonds, referred to Items 10 and 16, improvements the intersections of 76t' & 220'
and Highway 99 & 220t' as well as ST3 improvements, pointing out the plan is missing any improvements
to the intersection of 84t' Avenue & 220t'`. That intersection receives a lot of the traffic to/from the freeway
and what will be the new light rail station and is a mess every day. He has lived up the street from 84t' for
40 years and has seen the evolution of 84t' & 220t''. Although not quite as bad during COVID, buses going
to Chase Lake Elementary School back up the light for multiple cycles because there is no left turn signal
and traffic in the other direction on 84t' also backs up. It has also become a safety issue for pedestrians and
bicyclists as well as vehicles because people try to cut across the intersection ahead of oncoming traffic and
quite often there are close calls with pedestrians or bicycles crossing the street. There have also been a
number of accidents at that intersection with cars turning left not yielding the right-of-way to oncoming
traffic on 84t' as well as 220t''. He requested funding be taken away from other projects or looking into what
could be done to improve the situation before serious accidents or death occur there as well as to improve
traffic flow. He commented sometimes it is nearly impossible to get out of his driveway due to the oncoming
and backed -up traffic.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if staff had a response to the citizen comment about adding 84t' & 220t1i
to the list. Mr. Williams encouraged Mr. Schonbrun to send staff an email and/or talk to staff in more detail
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 16
Packet Pg. 19
6.1.a
about what he has observed over the years. Staff could consider it and report to Council. Mr. Schonbrun
said he would be happy to do that.
Councilmember Buckshnis recognized there was a July 1st approval deadline and asked if it could wait a
week or did the Council need to approve it tonight. Mr. Hauss answered the sooner the better; if Council
had items staff needed to respond to, it could wait until next week, but if not, Council could take action
tonight. Councilmember Buckshnis preferred to wait as she would like to learn more as about the inquiry
regarding 84t' & 220tn
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON TO
HAVE THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MOVED TO THE ACTION
CALENDAR FOR NEXT WEEK.
Councilmember Olson remarked there may be a chance the 84' issue will be resolved by the change at
220'. She asked Mr. Schonbrun whether he thought that would help. Mr. Schonbrun said it probably would
make things even worse by causing more traffic to back up at the intersection and he did not believe it was
synchronized with the light at 76t' & 220t1i or the light at 100' where it can be a challenge to get through
that intersection. Mayor Nelson reminded the public hearing was closed. He encouraged the public to email
all Councilmembers at Council@edmondswa.gov or email individual Councilmembers.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. REPORTS
1. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES UPDATE
Development Services Director Shane Hope reviewed:
• Customer service at counter, intake appointments
• COVID Response
o COVID Impacts to permitting
■ Prior to COVID, permitting activities were managed primarily in person and in paper
format
■ Within weeks, staff converted to an electronic system and refined that system in the
following months
■ All permitting is now online
- City Hall closes to public
- Staff starts telecommuting
- Permitting continues - applications, plan review, permit issuance, customer service
- Inspection procedures modified frequently due to construction restrictions
- City website continually updated to assist customers
- City ordinance extends permit expirations by 120 days
- 3% credit card fee suspended for all permit transactions
o Virtual Meetings
■ Coordination meetings amongst staff
■ Development Review Committee meetings with public
o COVID Impacts to Construction
■ March 23' Governor declares shutdown of all non -essential business, including
construction projects
■ April 24' Phase 1 allows restart of projects previously shutdown, along with essential
prof ects
■ June 5' Phase 2 allows newly permitted projects to start
■ COVID safety plans required on all job sites
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 17
Packet Pg. 20
6.1.a
• Online submittals
o MyBuildingPermit
■ One -stop portal for development service applications, inspection scheduling, permit status
information, and tip sheets for government agencies
■ Site visits to local businesses
o COVID 19 assistance
■ 120 site visits completed — retail, restaurants, personal services
• Permit Activity
o Graph of permit history comparing total Development Services revenue to number of building
permits 1985-2019
• Permits Reviewed by Development Services 2018 vs. 2019
Type of Permit
2018
# Issued
2019
# Issued
2018
Valuation
2019
Valuation
New
Single Family
57
26
$21,063,845
$11,692,071
Duplex
2 (4 units)
1 (2 units)
$935,029
$131,125
Apartment/Condo
1 ( 4 units)
4 (26 units)
$402,926
$3,343,502
Commercial
1
0
$2,619,780
0
Mixed Use
(Office/condo)
0
0
0
0
Additions/Alterations
Single Family
143
154
$9,088,843
$9,851,167
Apartment/Condo
15
15
$785,891
$1,674,247
Commercial
50
53
$10,100,158
$8,263,097
Other
Mechanical/Plumbing
413/442
441/379
Demolition
24
17
Miscellaneous
482
456
$3,051,647
$9,918,505
Total
1,646
$1,546
$48,048,119
$44,873,714
• Engineering Division (Right -of- a , side sewer, street use, and encroachment activity 2016-2019
2106
2017
2018
2019
Permits Issued
429
415
460
447
Permit Revenue
$58,082
$42,806
$58,221
$41,595
Inspection & Review Revenue
$214,337
$416,959
$249,427
$223,678
Impact Fees and General Facilities Charges (GFC's) for 2019
Trans ortation Impact Fees
$442,784
Park Impact Fees
$73,911
Water GFC
$229,805
Sewer GFC
$88,464
Storm GFC
$35,88
• Solar Permits
Year
# of Permits
# of Permits Online
% Online
kW
2012
3
0
0%
11
2013
6
5
83%
41
2014
39
35
90%
241
2015
32
29
91%
211
2016
17
16
94%
137
2017
0
0
0%
0
2018
3
2
67%
28.7
2019
12
11
92%
105.88
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 18
Packet Pg. 21
6.1.a
Totals 1 112 198 90% 1775.58
Over 8,750 inspections performed by Development Services staff
0 5,745 Building Inspections
0 3,020 Engineering Inspections
Building Inspections
0 2019
■ 23.95 avg/working day
0 2020
■ April = 86 Inspections
■ June = 461 Inspections
■ 23.05 avg/working day
Building Official Leif Bjorback reviewed:
• Map of projects
• New Development - Finaled
o Post Office / Phase II
■ 28 units + 7,600 single family new commercial
■ 201 Main St
o Cummings Apartments
■ 4 new residential units
■ 20904 — 72" d Ave W
o Westgate Village
■ 91 units + 3,100 new commercial
■ 10032 Edmonds Way
o Edmonds Village
■ Tenant improvement
■ 22019 Highway 99
o Kids Foundation Academy
■ Change of use
■ 21827 — 76t' Ave W
o Doug's Mazda Showroom & Service Center
■ 13,900 square feet new commercial space
■ 22214 Highway 99
New Development - Issued
o Doug's Mazda Service Center
■ 13,900 square feet new commercial space
■ 22214 Highway 99
o Doug's Hyundai Service Center
■ 12,00 square feet new commercial
■ 22214 Highway 99
o Waterfront Center
■ 26,000 square feet new commercial
■ 220 Railroad Ave.
o Kahlo's Cantina
■ 102 Main St
o Community Health Center
■ 7,000 square feet addition
■ 23320 Highway 99
o GRE Apartments
■ 192 new residential units
■ 23400 Highway 99
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 19
Packet Pg. 22
6.1.a
o Nyland Apartments
■ 19 new residential units
■ 8509 244th St SW
o Von's Bell St. Apartments
■ 4 new residential units
■ 650 Bell St.
o Graphite Studios
■ 11,000 square feet new commercial
■ 202 Main St.
New Development - Applied
o Anthology of Edmonds
■ Senior living 192 units
■ 21200 72nd Ave W
o Paradise Heights
■ 12 new residential units
■ 546 Paradise Lane
o Kisan Townhomes
■ 18 new residential units
■ 22810 Edmonds Way
o Edmonds Crossing
■ 10 new residential units
■ 23830 Edmonds Way
o Calvary Townhomes
■ 4 new townhome units
■ 21222 82nd Pl. SW
o Main Street Commons
■ Retail, restaurant and event space
■ 550 Main St.
o Civic Field
■ Anticipating going to bid January 2021
o New Development - Issued
■ New single family homes
■ 11 new residential units
■ 8609 — 244th St SW
o Woodway Court Plat
■ 5 lot plat
■ 23800 104th Ave.
o Westhaven Plat
■ 10 new residential units
■ 21515 98' Ave SW
Photos of new single family homes
o Olympic View Drive
0 72' Ave W
o Edmonds St.
0 2nd Ave N
o Cary Road
0 13' Ave
o Main St.
0 6th Ave
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 20
Packet Pg. 23
6.1.a
Councilmember Paine asked how many projects had taken advantage of Multi Family Tax Exemption
(MFTE) program. Ms. Hope answered there were only two that she knew of, one at Westgate, and another
that had been approved and was under construction. There are one or two others in the Highway 99 area
that are seeking to utilize it. The MFTE program only applies to the Highway 99 and Westgate areas.
Councilmember Paine asked if there was a second one in Westgate in addition to the Bartell project. Ms.
Hope answered there was nothing else being built at Westgate at this point.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she always look forwards to this report, it is her favorite report and there
are good pictures. She referred to the graphite studios and asked if the alley had been vacated. Ms. Hope
answered the alley was not vacated. They are still dealing with the alley and are considering building
something behind the art gallery but that is not yet final. Councilmember Buckshnis commented even
though it is totally fenced off, the alley will remain. Ms. Hope agreed it would, it provides access so it is
useful.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed she had heard the GRE Apartments will provide an overpass over
Highway 99. Ms. Hope answered that was not correct. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the GRE
Apartments utilized MFTE.
Councilmember Distelhorst asked whether in addition to MFTE, if any other affordable housing units had
been built. Ms. Hope answered no, with the market being what it is, those are not built unless there is a
project with a non-profit organization that has grant funds or MFTE is the only other option for providing
less than market rate housing.
Councilmember Olson recalled the developer of the Cummings Apartment planted a lot more trees than the
code requires. She appreciated that effort and focus by the developer and suggested giving them a shoutout.
Ms. Hope said she would pass that on.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding the Compass Apartments were no longer being built.
Ms. Hope agreed; Compass decided not to pursue that, it may have been partially related to funding issues.
At some point something else will happen there but there is nothing on the horizon.
9. ACTION ITEM
APPROVAL OF HEARING EXAMINER CONTRACT
Development Services Director Shane Hope explained the Hearing Examiner oversees public hearings that
fall under that process. The City does not have as many Hearing Examiner hearings as there used to be but
they are still very important. Phil Olbrechts has served in that position for a numbers years and has been
doing a very good job. The last time the City did an RFP process for a Hearing Examiner, it did not identify
anyone better and Mr. Olbrechts seemed to be performing his work very well. The Mayor decided to
reappoint Mr. Olbrechts and get Council confirmation to move the contract forward.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding that the contract expired in 2019. Ms. Hope answered
it expired at the end of 2019. As with other contracts, the existing contract can continue. When the COVID
restrictions were in place, staff was left trying to figure out what to do. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled
Mr. Olbrechts has gone a year without a contract before. She relayed a question that just because he was
out of contract did not mean that his rulings were considered null and void. Ms. Hope answered absolutely
not, they are just as effective as ever; Mr. Olbrechts had to trust that the City would pay him.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, FOR
APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 21
Packet Pg. 24
6.1.a
2. EXTENSION OF INTERIM CHIEF OF POLICE
Councilmember Buckshnis explained these are challenging times due to COVID and getting things done
and properly approved. The contract expired July 1, 2020 and Mayor Nelson has asked to renew the contract
as Interim Chief of Police. She asked if there were any issues with Interim Chief Lawless working out of
contract for three weeks. She questioned why this had dropped through the cracks and assumed COVID
would be the answer. A lot of people are watching the police who have been part of huge social justice
issues. City Attorney Jeff Taraday answered there are several components to the question and he will also
offer HR Director Jessica Neill-Hoyson an opportunity to respond to some of the questions. He explained
there was some significance to the fact that the acting appointment expired. Unless Mayor Nelson has taken
action that he is not aware of, as of right this second, there is no acting police chief. There are two assistant
chiefs of police and Mayor Nelson has presumably given certain chief type roles to Mr. Lawless to continue
as what is essential a leader of the department until such time that there is another acting chief or a
permanent appointment is confirmed. He clarified there is no contract, it is an acting director appointment
that pursuant to City code can only be in effect for a six month period. Councilmember Buckshnis said in
other words, Mr. Lawless is no longer considered an interim police chief. Mr. Taraday said as of right this
second, he is no longer an acting police chief because that status as matter of law expired after six months.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented that was unfortunate and questioned why that occurred. Ms. Neill-
Hoyson said at one point a decision was made for the Mayor to forward a single name and an amendment
to the code was required to do that. Unfortunately at that point, the City Council could not review a code
changes for putting for single candidate forward for the permanent placement to director due to the
necessary and routine analysis that happened during the suspension of the OPMA. There was still interest
in forwarding a single name to Council, but the deadline for addressing the end of acting assignment was
missed.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed the code amendment is Item 10.2. She recalled only two candidates
were interviewed when the HR position was filled so she viewed it as routine. She wondered why it was
not presented sooner. Ms. Neill-Hoyson said the code amendment was delayed and in the meantime, the
deadline for extending the acting assignment was missed. Mr. Taraday explained Item 10.2 had been
discussed internally during the time when the City Council was limited to necessary and routine actions
only. Item 10.2 did not meet the standards for necessary and routine so it could not have be brought forward
earlier. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned hiring a chief of police not being necessary and routine. Mr.
Taraday said amending the code to dispense with the three interview requirement was not necessary and
routine. Councilmember Buckshnis thought it was an exception or variance, not an amendment. Mr.
Taraday explained Item 10.2 is an ordinance that would amend the code to allow the creation of an
exception for waiving the three interview requirement.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the Council had conducted less than three interviews in the past; she
recalled that was done in 2011 with Mr. Hunstock and the code was not changed then. Mr. Taraday said
there are already two other exceptions to the three interview requirement in the code, one may have applied
to the Hunstock situation, but there is currently no exception in the code that allows for only one candidate
to be interviewed.
Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out Police Chief Compaan retired seven months ago. During that time,
first Mayor Nelson announced he was going to do a nationwide search and allocated funds for that purpose.
Then he made a press announcement, not informing City Council, stating he was appointing Assistant Chief
Lawless to that position. Now he is saying he wants to appoint ACOP Lawless to that position full-time,
disregarding the City Council's three interview policy. The City has a system of checks and balances for a
reason. If the Council adopted the one interview rule, it would basically eliminate the City Council from
any choice. She believed there needed to be a strong City Council and this proposal weakens the City
Council. Her comments had nothing to do with ACOP Lawless but were about the proper roles and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 22
Packet Pg. 25
6.1.a
responsibilities. Just because the Council has limited the number of candidates to two in past, she would
hate to go to one, because then the Council essentially had no say in the matter.
Mayor Nelson reminded this is not Agenda Item 10.2, this item is related to extension of the acting chief.
Councilmember Paine asked if there was any functional problem for a city not to have a designated chief
of police. Mr. Taraday said if what Councilmember Paine was asking was whether anything changed since
June 30t' when Mr. Lawless was the acting chief to July 1st when he reverted to being an assistant police
chief with extra responsibilities, although he had not discussed it with Mr. Lawless, he imagined the way
the Police Department functions is probably exactly the same. What changed was Mr. Lawless' rate of pay;
he is no longer being paid as an acting chief. Councilmember Paine asked if there was any regulatory
requirement that a city has to have a chief of police. Mr. Taraday answered he did not know the answer to
that question off the top of his head; even if a city was ordinarily required to have a police of chief, there
must be provisions for that position to be vacant from time to time as it is now.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
EXTEND FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON
VOTING NO.
Councilmember Distelhorst said if Acting Chief Lawless was now back to Assistant Chief Lawless with
some extra duties, not receiving the acting chief pay but receiving some additional pay for additional duties.
Mr. Taraday agreed. The City has special duty pay which he assumed Mr. Lawless would qualify for.
Special duty pay is distinct from acting pay and he assumed if Mr. Lawless was no longer entitled to acting
pay, he was probably entitled to special duty pay. Ms. Neill-Hoyson answered that was correct. When an
employee is assigned additional duties by the Mayor, they may receive special duty pay which is up to 10%
of their current wages. Mr. Lawless is still receiving the same compensation he would as if he was in the
acting capacity, the category just has different authority.
Councilmember Distelhorst said following a conversation with Mr. Taraday his understanding was that
since the six months has passed, from the letter of the law, this would not necessarily be an extension; it
may have to be the Mayor making another appointment to acting chief based on the meaning of the law
versus a strict interpretation and looking at retro authority. Mr. Taraday answered that was an important
point to clarify. Even though the six months has expired and the acting chief appointment has expired, it
was right thing to do for the Mayor to ask Council for permission to extend, because Councilmember
Distelhorst was right, technically speaking according to the letter of law it may not make sense to extend
something that has already expired. However, he did not think it was the intent of this chapter to exploit
what is essentially a loophole in the code that would allow the Mayor to appoint an acting director for six
months, then let that directorship expire, thereby creating another vacancy and then according to the letter
of the code, the Mayor can appoint another acting director to fill that vacancy. It is the right thing to do to
ask the Council's blessing to do that. Had the Mayor sought this out a month ago, it's clear under the code
that Council permission would have been required for that extension. The loophole in the code allows any
vacancy to be filled by an acting director for six months and that theoretically can be done by the Mayor
tomorrow if the Council does not act on this tonight. The Mayor is essentially asking Council to effectively
bless that continuing status until such time there is a permanent chief.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked whether there was a difference in pay between a fulltime appointed
police chief and an acting police chief. Ms. Neill-Hoyson answered a full-time appointed police chief s pay
would have been negotiated and established at the time of their hire. An acting police chief or anyone in an
acting director capacity receives at least a 5% increase in compensation for doing that position. She
summarized the pay could be different based on what is negotiated at the time of hire for a regular
appointment.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 23
Packet Pg. 26
6.1.a
Councilmember K. Johnson said having someone in an acting position for over a year with only a 5%
increase is a disservice. She asked why it has taken seven months to fill this position. Ms. Neill-Hoyson
said when the Mayor first wanted to recruit for the position, the City retained a recruiting consultant to
begin that work. As that work began and the position was close to being posted, the COVID pandemic
erupted. After discussion with Mayor Nelson and consultant it was agreed that attempting to recruit for a
police chief when services were shut down and the nation was in the middle of a pandemic would likely
not result in an adequate candidate pool. The consultant was asked to hold on the recruitment until more
was known about how the COVID issue would develop. Subsequent to that, Mayor Nelson made his
decision known that he would like to move forward with a single candidate once that was addressed with
Council. However, it could not be addressed with Council because code adjustments were not necessary
and routine actions. Now that the necessary and routine restriction has been listed, the code amendment can
be presented to Council for discussion.
Councilmember K. Johnson said this week is the first time she has heard there is only a single applicant
coming forward; Council has not been informed of that. She asked how long it will take to appoint a
permanent position so an appropriate salary can be negotiated. Ms. Neill-Hoyson answered that will depend
on the outcome of the discussion regarding the code changes or how Council wants to move forward with
considering a single candidate rather than two or three candidates.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked about the range of time that would take, whether it would take another
six months. Ms. Neill-Hoyson said the proposed code changes are on tonight's agenda for discussion, once
that discussion occurs, it can be moved to action at the next meeting if that is the Council's wish. Once that
is done, staff can move forward with bringing one candidate to Council. Councilmember K. Johnson asked
how long it would take if three candidates were brought to Council as required in the current code. Ms.
Neill-Hoyson answered posting and recruiting for a position would need to occur; she envisioned
potentially 4 months before initial interviews and 4-5 months before 3 candidates were in front of Council.
Councilmember K. Johnson observed basically no recruiting had been done in the past seven months and
the one candidate option has been moved forward with this one candidate option. Ms. Neill-Hoyson
reiterated it was not deemed feasible to recruit for a police chief due to the COVID pandemic.
Councilmember K. Johnson said the City is still in the middle of the COVID pandemic
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, commenting this discussion was related to Item 10.2.
Mayor Nelson agreed and requested Councilmembers' comments relate to the agenda item currently under
discussion.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out staff recommendation is to approve extension of the interim
appointment for James Lawless as chief of police for a period of July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020.
According to Mr. Taraday, that cannot be done because appointments can only be for a six month period.
She asked for clarification regarding what staff was asking Council to do. Mr. Taraday said there were a
couple ways to look at staff s recommendation. If the Council is bothered by the literal term "extend" in
the context of what is currently a vacancy, and if the Council wants to take action tonight that supports what
would effectively be an extension of Mr. Lawless as the acting chief, the Council could indicate to the
Mayor that it would not object to the Mayor's appointment tomorrow of Mr. Lawless as acting chief, taking
advantage of the loophole he described in the code that essentially allows the Mayor to do that with or
without the Council's blessing. If the Council wanted to give that blessing in lieu of the motion in the staff
report, that would be one way to do it. It essentially has same exact effect; there is still Council approval
being given to create another six month term of acting chief but it is being doing in a way that perhaps
comports more with the literal state of the code.
Councilmember Olson said she was satisfied with that approach. She has spent a lot of time thinking about
it this week, there were a lot of things that bothered her about it including ignoring the spirit of the law.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 24
Packet Pg. 27
Offering the opportunity to the Mayor with the Council's support to basically reappoint provides legal
standing to proceed. The amendment that Mr. Taraday just shared is the best approach.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, THAT WE
ENCOURAGE THE MAYOR TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE LOOPHOLE AS DESCRIBED BY
MR. TARADAY AND AS ALLOWED THROUGH ECC 2.10.010 SECTION E AND 2.10.040
SECTION B.
At Councilmember Distelhorst's request, Councilmember Paine restated the motion:
TO ASK THE MAYOR TO REAPPOINT FOR THIS VACANT POSITION AT HIS EARLIEST
CONVENIENCE USING THE CURRENT CODES THAT WE HAVE NOW.
Councilmember K. Johnson commented ACOP Chief Lawless has done an excellent job. He was
recommended for appointment by retiring Chief Compaan and confirmed by Mayor Nelson. She felt badly
that he has been working full-time in this position with only a 5% pay increase which she felt was a
disservice to him. She stated her support for the work he has done for the City.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON,
TO REMOVE ITEM 10.3.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she asked for redline of previous codes that were not included in the packet
and the item was scheduled for 60 minutes. She was hopeful there would be a more complete packet next
week.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. STUDY ITEMS
1. PROPOSAL TO EXTEND THE PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATOR AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
EXTEND FOR 10 MINUTES.
Councilmember Olson pointed out at least 20 minutes would be needed as there are two agenda items
remaining as well as comments.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
EXTEND FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON
VOTING NO.
Public Works Director Phil Williams said the City has had a program administrator working under contract
at the WWTP for the last year and that one-year contract is due to expire at the end of the month. He would
like to extend the contract, the budget exists for the position but the term of the contract needs to be
extended. The person under contract is Michael Derrick who came to the WWTP from the Ronald
Wastewater District where he was the general manager. He is well qualified for the position and has done
a great job during the time he has been with the City, is learning rapidly and is a good right hand to WWTP
Manger Pamela Randolph. The annual salary for the position is approximately $98,000 so the extension for
six months is half that plus his benefits of approximately $70,000, funds that have already been budgeted.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 25
Packet Pg. 28
6.1.a
Councilmember Olson observed this contract had not yet expired. Mr. Williams agreed. Councilmember
Olson asked how it was caught before it expired. Mr. Williams answered there is a tickler file as a reminder.
It was cut close, tonight is a study item and if it is on the July 28' agenda for approval, the contract expires
on July 31 st. Councilmember Olson said she would like to see that happen a lot more often. She could not
recall a single contract expiration that was missed when she was in the Air Force on active duty as a
contracting officer and was certain the City could do better.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the contract should be through December 31, 2020 not 2019. Mr.
Williams agreed. He explained he plans to bring to Council at the August 11 committee meeting a
reorganization proposal for how the WWTP is staffed, but that would not change this request.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON,
TO MOVE THIS TO CONSENT NEXT WEEK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW EXCEPTION TO THREE -INTERVIEW
REQUIREMENT
City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained the packet contains a draft ordinance creating a third exception to the
Council's three interview requirement. The code already contains two other exceptions. This exception is
narrowly tailored to address only circumstances where an acting director has been in place for six months
and only in that circumstance would this new exception be triggerable. This essentially recognizes the
unique set of circumstances where an acting director has been serving admirably and it may not make sense
in that circumstance to have a full blown recruitment when the person has been observed on the job for six
months and their capabilities are already known. The policy question for the Council is whether they still
want to have a full blown recruitment even where they have been able to observe someone's performance
in the job for six months.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she looks at this differently. She has supported Mr. Lawless forever; she
has known him through the dog park and knows what a great guy he is. She asked if language could be
included about promoting from within. She recalled when she first was elected, Lorenzo Hines was an
interim/acting finance director yet, the City did a recruitment to have two more people to interview to fulfill
the code. She said promoting from within would define it differently; an acting director is generally from
within the organization. Mr. Taraday answered it could be, but it would not always be. He recalled in the
past there were several different people in the role of interim finance director, people that were brought in
to do the job who were not City employees. The proposed code language could limit the exception to people
who were previously City employees. If the Council has the opportunity to observe someone doing a job
for six months, it may not matter if they were previously a City employee or not.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled none of the finance directors were acting, they were contractors that
filled in between Mr. Hunstock and Mr. Neumeier. She recalled when she was first elected, Lorenzo Hines
was acting and when he was moved to finance director, two other candidates were interviewed. She
observed if an acting person was appointed, there would only be one person to interview which removes
the Council oversight capabilities. Mr. Taraday referred to a comment made earlier tonight that this
ordinance takes away the Council's choice. He suggested the Council think about it differently; the Council
really never has a choice with regard to appointment, that is always the Mayor's power. The Council may
interview three candidates and suggest to the Mayor that they like one candidate best, but the Mayor is
never under any obligation to appoint that candidate. The idea that there is more choice for the Council with
additional interviews is somewhat of a fallacy. While the Council potentially has the ability to make a
suggestion to the Mayor about the candidates, but it is always the Mayor's choice whether there are one,
two or three candidates who are interviewed. Furthermore and perhaps most importantly, the Council is
never required to confirm a mayoral appointment. It is the same as the Supreme Court; just like the senate
is never required to confirm a presidential appointment to the Supreme Court, the Council is never required
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 26
Packet Pg. 29
6.1.a
to confirm a mayoral director appointment. Even if there is only one candidate, it doesn't in any way lessen
the Council's power. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled an instance when the Council liked one candidate
better and the Mayor selected someone else.
Ms. Neill-Hoyson clarified the proposed code amendment does not allow the Mayor to automatically bring
forward one candidate; it allows the Mayor to request that exception of the Council who then has to approve
it in each instance. The code language simply allows the Council to consider that request should it be made,
it is not automatic.
Councilmember Olson suggested the language be changed from "six months" to "more than four." She was
happy the Council was considering this code change, recognizing it was brought on by the specific situation
which is absolutely relevant to the conversation. As there has been a press release regarding the Mayor's
intention to appoint Mr. Lawless, the City is unlikely to get anyone to submit their name and potentially
jeopardize their current job by showing interest. It has to be done in this particular instance, but additional
the fact that hiring from within was never anticipated is a little problematic and there should provisions in
code indicating a desire to promote from within because that helps attract and retain good talent. She was
in favor of making this change to provide an opportunity to promote an acting director. It is a good idea to
anticipate hiring from within and to having that prevents wasting staff time, resources and possibly money
when there is an in-house candidate that the Mayor is happy with.
Councilmember Distelhorst commented there has been a lot of talk about this code change and the
application to the chief of police but this applies to all appointed officers. He wanted to ensure the Council
had that discussion looking at everyone and not just Mr. Lawless. He noted there was currently one other
acting appointed position, Mr. Turley. Ms. Neill-Hoyson agreed.
Councilmember L. Johnson said it was reassuring that the Mayor and Police Department fully support Mr.
Lawless. She thanked him for his diligent service during these challenging times. For the same reason she
supported the initial recruitment process and bringing forward three candidates, she still supported that
process. This is probably the most significant director position in the City and there is an opportunity to go
the distance and ensure the best choice is made for the citizens of Edmonds and she would like to see that
done. Due to Council President Fraley-Monillas' absence tonight, she did not want this to go on the Consent
Agenda next week to ensure she had an opportunity to weigh in as well.
In response to Councilmember L. Johnson's comments, Councilmember Olson said the City really does not
have that opportunity now that there has been press release. The City won't get the candidates and it is not
that easy to get candidates in the first place. The City is in the middle of COVID and a crisis where having
an official police of chief is in the City's best interest.
Councilmember Distelhorst echoed Councilmember L. Johnson comments, pointing out the City has a
Racial and Justice Equity Taskforce that is working on police policies and it is important to hear their
recommendations for the Police Department and then reflect on those in regard to the chief of police
position. He appreciated that there is potentially a 6 month runway, if the Mayor chooses to appoint a new
acting police chief, which will provide more time to evaluate other ongoing work streams that directly
impact this position and its relationship with the community.
Councilmember Olson said she was very disappointed to hear those sentiments expressed. The City has
been so well served by Chief Lawless during unbelievable circumstances. She could not fathom there was
anyone in the community that would show a lack of appreciation like that for someone who has been
everything we could ever hope for in a chief of police.
3. REVIEW OF COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 27
Packet Pg. 30
6.1.a
Due to the late hour and a desire for additional information, this item was postponed to next week.
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
EXTEND FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Nelson said the City has received a lot of feedback regarding the dog park and some public facilities
like beaches where a lot of people are not practicing social distancing and only some wearing masks. He
wanted it to be very clear that if people were unable to practice social distancing and unable to wear masks,
that to protect the health and safety of citizens, those facilities will no longer be open. It is in everyone's
best interest to practice social distancing and to wear masks, but just because people are wearing masks
does not mean they can stand next to each other and talk. He urged the public to continue to wear masks so
these facilities can remain open for everyone to enjoy.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember L. Johnson urged the public to be safe, wear your mask, practice social distancing and do
your part to protect your family and your neighbors.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mayor Nelson for making an announcement about the dog park. There
is a lot of shaming going on and people are fighting over wearing a mask. She preferred everyone just get
along and either keep their distance or wear a mask, noting people entering the dog park should probably
wear a mask. It's unfortunate that there are bad reviews because people are angry and fighting. She
recognized it was a tough time and urged everyone to calm down.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the citizens who reached out to her about the bicycle lanes and bike
plans. Although she does not bike, she wanted to be very responsible and listen to what people are saying.
She encouraged citizens to continue to reach out to her and if they really need to have their voice heard,
write a letter to the editor. She urged everyone to get along, stay safe and wear a mask.
Councilmember K. Johnson stated be well.
Councilmember Distelhorst echoed the comments about wearing a mask, maintaining social distance, and
not having group events because people are still not supposed to be meeting with more than five people
outside their household in a week. He wished a Happy Birthday to his daughter who was turning 14
tomorrow and his daughter who was turning 23 on Thursday.
Councilmember Olson thanked staff, commenting these have been very difficult situations. Staff has done
a lot of great work and it really shows in everything that was brought forward today and everything the
Council has seen. At the top of that list is Chief Lawless who has been at the table, conversational, open
and respectful; she was proud and in awe of the role he has played in the community. She hoped the City
has the opportunity to have him as the official chief in very short order.
Councilmember Paine encouraged everyone to wear their masks and mind their physical distancing as
things are spiraling in the wrong direction. She encouraged the administration to consider closing 5t'
Avenue rather than Main Street so that other commercial businesses can partake in the additional space.
She recognized there would need to be traffic considerations, but it would be great if businesses on 5t1i
Avenue had the opportunity to have more space. She wouldn't mind if there was a T of closed streets. She
summarized it was unfair to focus only on Main Street when there are also wonderful businesses on 5t'
Avenue.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 28
Packet Pg. 31
6.1.a
1901110130
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:44 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 29
Packet Pg. 32
6.1.a
Public Comment for 7/21 Council Meeting
7/21/20 Michael McMurray, Subject: Public Comments- proliferation of bike lanes in Edmond's-
Devastating to local surface street parking capacity
I am very concerned that there has not been proper analysis completed on the impact to surface
street parking capacity caused by the planned proliferation of bike lanes in Edmonds (agenda
item 7.1). Council members should be made aware QFC, PCC and other surrounding
businesses along 100th and 9th avenue utilize those close proximity surface street parking
spaces for their many employees. Eliminating those parking spaces for designated bike lanes,
will logically push people to park their cars into surrounding neighborhoods
(Greenlake neighborhood and Ballard communities come to mind). Also what is wrong with
"Sharrows" lanes instead of Designated bike lanes? I discovered the 84th street bike lane
augmentation was almost entirely "Sharrows" until the end of the run when the bike lanes
entered the business district of 5 corners, resulting in the loss of 21 surface street parking
spaces when it switched to a designated lane. So "Sharrows" lanes are acceptable in front of
Elementary schools they should be acceptable in other locations especially near
local businesses and residential neighborhoods? Also Bowdoin street has many multi -family
units near 5 corners that utilize those surface street parkings spaces currently for their
residents. The impact to surface street parking supply vs bike ridership should be more
scrutinized and examined by council. I feel the designated bike lanes are nice up by Edmonds-
Woodway and well designed, so not negative on all bike lanes. Seems like we are not taking our
neighborhoods and many local business parking impacts into consideration with these plans.
Council should Consider giving the money back to Sound Transit, they could use the money to
finish the various rail connections, with anticipated revenue shortfalls coming from Covid-19
budget fallout. Thanks for listening,
7/21/20 Steve Kaiser, Subject: Citywide Bicycle Improvements
I strongly support the proposed citywide bicycle improvement projects. More than ever,
Edmonds residents need safe routes to ride their bikes. Safety is the number one deterrent for
most new cyclists. As you may know, coronavirus has increased bicycle sales by as much as
203%. Where will these new bike owners ride safely? Please see the complete article with
information from The NPD Group for details. Steve Kaiser Edmonds resident and cyclist
June 16, 2020 — The unprecedented growth trend for U.S. cycling sales that began in March
accelerated even further in April, according to The NPD Group. April sales for traditional bikes,
indoor bikes, parts, helmets, and other accessories grew a combined 75% to $1 billion
compared to last year. This is the first month since NPD began tracking the cycling market that
sales have reached $1 billion in a single month. Typically, April sales fall between $550 and
$575 million. Bicycles suitable for family use, neighborhood riding, and those with more
approachable price -points showed the strongest year -over -year sales gains. Lifestyle/leisure
bikes, which are more basic adult bicycles sold at prices under $200, grew by 203%; front
suspension mountain bikes were up by more than 150%; and children's bikes increased by
107% for the month. Accessories sales also grew, including helmets (+49%), water bottle cages
(+60%), and bike baskets (+85%). "For far too long the cycling industry has been solely focused
on the pinnacle athlete, but these results show that a broader, family and beginner focus can
reap gains. This is a silver lining, and one of the important sports retail lessons to come out of
the pandemic," said Matt Powell, NPD's sports industry advisor. Another trend that emerged in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 30
Packet Pg. 33
6.1.a
March and amplified in April was the purchase of cycling equipment for indoor riding. Stationary
bike sales grew by 270% for the month, with April sales the second -highest that NPD currently
has on record. Trainers and rollers, which allow bikers to mount their current bicycles and ride
indoors, experienced a growth rate of 415%. "The excitement that consumers are showing in
cycling, particularly in recreational and family riding, is an absolutely amazing moment for the
bike community. This is a unique and powerful chance for retailers, manufacturers, and non-
profit organizations to engage new riders," said Dirk Sorenson, sports industry analyst at NPD.
"Continued growth will require them not only to have product in stock, but to focus on new
riders' basic needs such as how to fix a flat tire, or locating a family -friendly trail to ride.
Addressing these basics right now has immeasurable ROI, and the industry should be laser -
focused on servicing these new riders." Source: The NPD Group/ U.S. Retail Tracking Service/
April 2020 vs. April 2019
7/21/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Public Comments for July 21, 2020 City Council meeting
For years, I have railed against the provision of false, misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete
information to City Council and Hearing Examiners in advance of decisions. Despite my efforts,
it continues to happen. Tonight's agenda provides further proof of this. I will just discuss two
examples:
1. Council is being asked to approve a four-year contract for Hearing Examiner Services
retroactive to January 1, 2020. The Council Packet fails to include the related Code Section
which clearly states that "The hearing examiner shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed
by the city council for a term of four years." Why is Council being asked to approve a contract
before being asked to confirm an appointment?
2. Council is being asked to approve an extension of Mr. Lawless' acting directorship
retroactive to July 1 st through December 31 st. The related Code Section was left out of the
Agenda Packet. That Code Section clearly informs that the acting directorship shall expire and
be deemed vacant six months after the date of the acting appointment. As such, there is
nothing that the Council can legally extend. Furthermore, the Code section is very clear that
there is only one reason that the Mayor can request an extension - to allow the recruiting
process to continue. There is no ongoing recruiting process, so Mayor Nelson has no legal right
to request an extension.
City Council has repeatedly ignored my requests for more information about the tool of
reconsideration to fight back against the provision of false, misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete
information to City Council. One last point, I request City Council give consideration to what
City Council and the City government should do when a citizen provides
evidence after a hearing that City Staff chose to provide incomplete information and an
incomplete list of applicable Code Sections to the Hearing Examiner. Please take a deep look at
the use of the Hearing Examiner System in Edmonds. History shows that City Staff will
choose to provide incomplete information and an incomplete list of applicable
laws to the Hearing Examiner. As such, a strong argument can be made that
the Hearing Examiner system doesn't work in Edmonds. Can the current City Council implement
changes that address situations in which City Staff choose to provide incomplete information
and an incomplete list of applicable laws to the Hearing Examiner? If not, how can current
elected officials continue to allow citizens of Edmonds to be
exposed to the Hearing Examiner system? At a minimum, please immediately suspend use of
the Hearing Examiner System in Edmonds until steps can be taken to prevent City Staff from
providing incomplete information and an incomplete list of applicable
laws to the Hearing Examiner.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 31
Packet Pg. 34
6.1.a
7/20/20 Jennifer McCloughan, Subject: City of Edmonds Bike Improvements Project
I am unable to attend the zoom meeting on the City of Edmonds Bicycle Improvement Project
that is going to be discussed at the meeting however I would like to add the following
statement: The Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project for the City of Edmonds would be a great
opportunity for our students in the Edmonds School District to ride their bikes to and from
school. The roads that are being considered for improvements would make bicycle riding much
safer for students than what they are currently. As the K-12 PE, Health, and Move 60
Coordinator, I am always trying to find ways to advocate for healthy living for our students.
Bicycle riding to and from school is a good way for students to get in exercise before and after
school. Safe roads are important for students to feel confident which will increase their
likelihood of riding their bike to school. Thank you for this opportunity and I hope that the City of
Edmonds moves forward on this project!
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 21, 2020
Page 32
Packet Pg. 35
6.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #243107 through #243216 dated July 23, 2020 for $1,600,122.19 (re -issued
check #243183 $6,796.00) and wire payment of $6,321.77.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 07-23-20
wire 07-23-20
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 07-23-20
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 : 20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
243107
7/23/2020
075085 1 LINGUA LLC
343
1 LINGUA YEARLY FEE
1 LINGUA YEARLY FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
Tota I :
243108
7/23/2020
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-81985
INTERPRETER - XZ0127001
INTERPRETER - XZ0127001
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
Total
243109
7/23/2020
077232 A&M CONTRACTORS LLC
EBCC.Pmt 6
EBCC.PMT 6 THRU 6/30/20
EBCC.Pmt 6 thru 6/30/20
112.000.68.595.61.65.00
EBCC.Pmt 6 thru 6/30/20
126.000.68.595.61.65.00
Total
243110
7/23/2020
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
34622
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSS
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
Total
243111
7/23/2020
077832 AARON C SHEARER
5/10/2018
CASE 18-0287 - EDMONDS PD
CS18-0287 -CASH SEIZURE RETUF
001.000.245.900
Tota I :
243112
7/23/2020
064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
135155627
ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
6.2.a
Page: 1
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 2
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243112 7/23/2020 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
27.5£
135155628
ALARM MONITORING - FS #16
ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST
f°
a
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
34.1, L
135155629
ALARM MONITORING - FS #17
3
ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
78.3'
135155630
ALARM MONITORING - HISTORIC N
Y
ALARM MONITORING Museum, 120
U
m
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
116.9( u
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
12.1 £ 'M
135155631
ALARM MONITORING - WWTP
ALARM MONITORING WWTP - 200 ;
O
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
45.9E >
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
4.7£ a
135155632
ALARM MONITORING - PUBLIC SAF
Q
ALARM MONITORING Public Safety,
c
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
101.9( M
10.4% Sales Tax
C�
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
10.6( c
135155633
FIRE INSPECTION - MUSEUM, PUB
Fire Inspection FIRE STATION #17
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
55.4, U
Fire Inspection - Historical Museum
+:
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
35.0,
Fire Inspection - Public Safety
E
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
153.3z m
Total :
703.71 Q
243113 7/23/2020 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
10660
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF-
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
165,683.5,
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
243113 7/23/2020 000850 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT (Continued)
243114 7/23/2020 071634 ALLSTREAM 16956422
243115 7/23/2020 001528 AM TEST INC
243116 7/23/2020 073573 ANIXTER
243117 7/23/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
116598
Description/Account
Total
C/A 768328
PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929;
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
Total
WWTP: SAMPLE 20-AO08632 ALKAI
SAMPLE 20-AO08632 ALKALINITY,
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
231<255482 FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
231<255657 FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total
1991831637 WWTP: 7/15/20 UNIFORMS,TOWEL
Mats/Towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
6.2.a
Page: 3
Amoun
165,683.5:
m
E
�a
a
1,154.3� m
L
3
10.7(
c
�a
10.7( Y
1,175.7< U
t
v
E
170.0(
170.0( o
R
0
a
172.31 Q
17.9, N
M
N
100.1(
E
10.4' .M
300.71
m
E
t
51.4E
r
Q
1.4'
5.3E
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 39
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 4
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243117 7/23/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
0.1 f
1991831638
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
f°
a
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
56.5E L
10.4% Sales Tax
3
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
5.8E c
1991836893
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
Y
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6' um
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1' E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
R
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
0
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1' >
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
o
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0E a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1 � o
10.4% Sales Tax
M
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6z N
10.4% Sales Tax
o
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6,
10.4% Sales Tax
M
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.61
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6z
E
10.4% Sales Tax
t
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.6"
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
r
Q
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1'
1991836894
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2�
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243117
7/23/2020
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.9 "
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.9f
Total:
187.61
243118
7/23/2020
077816 BARTON, MARSHA
2005327.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
256.9!
Total:
256.9°
243119
7/23/2020
075217 BASLER, ANTHONY
51742
INTERPRETER - 9Z1077811
INTERPRETER - 9Z1077811
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
100.0(
51935
INTERPRETER - 9Z1001789
INTERPRETER - 9Z1001789
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
100.0(
51937
INTERPRETER - XZ0213347
INTERPRETER - XZ0213347
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
100.0(
52029
INTERPRETER - XZ0242588
INTERPRETER - XZ0546886
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
100.0(
Total :
400.0(
243120
7/23/2020
066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC
612658
EBFC.PLANS & SPECS REPRODUC
EBFC.Plans & Specs Reproduction
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
460.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
47.8!
Total :
507.9°
243121
7/23/2020
077825 BUHL, HEIDI
2005338.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243121 7/23/2020 077825 B U H L, H E I D I
243122 7/23/2020 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
243123 7/23/2020 077827 CAMPAGNA, MARGARETTA
243124 7/23/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 6
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
c
E,
001.000.239.200
200.0(
Total:
200.0(
a
(D
5694487 ROADWAY - ASPHALT
3
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
317.9E
10.0% Sales Tax
Y
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
31.7£
u
5694785 ROADWAY - ASPHALT
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
E
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
237.0
'M
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
23.7E
O
5695722 ROADWAY - ASPHALT
>
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
o
L
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
351.7.E 0-
10.0% Sales Tax
Q
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
35.1 £ o
5696038 ROADWAY - ASPHALT
N
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
C14
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
280.2E c
10.0% Sales Tax
U)
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
28.0< .E
Total:
1,305.71 2
2005340.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
CD
E
001.000.239.200
60.0( U
Total:
60.0(
Q
21682575 INV 21682575 - EDMONDS PD
7/20- CONTRACT CHARGE- IR6255
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.8,
6/20- BW METER USAGE- IR6255
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243124 7/23/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 7
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
r
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
c
8.6,
7/20- CONTRACT CHARGE- IRC332
E
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
60.7( a
6/20- BW METER USAGE- IRC5240)
L
.3
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
21.1(
6/20- CLR METER USAGE-IRC5240)
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
c
78.5(
10.4% Sales Tax
Y
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
50.0, W
7/20- CONTRACT CHARGE-IRC524(
U
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
160.0( E
21682576
JULY 2020 INVOICE
ii
JULY 2020 INVOCIE - CANON
U
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
59.5, O
10.4% Sales Tax
>
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
6.1 � o
21682577
C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521
a
Finance dept copier contract charge
Q
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
209.6- c
B&W Meter usage IRC5250
N
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
M
12.7- N
Color Meter usage IRC5250
0
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
50.3( E
10.4% Sales Tax
M
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
28.3E
21682578
CONTRACT/METER USAGE JUNE -
10.4% Sales Tax
m
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
60.0E t
contract/meter usage june thru july 2(
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
r
577.3E Q
21682583
BLDG DEPT COPIER MONTHLY CO
Bldg Dept Copier - monthly
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
33.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 8
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243124 7/23/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued)
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
3.4E
21682584
PLANNING COPIER MONTLY CONT
Planning Dept Copier - Monthly
a
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
51.4E L
10.4% Sales Tax
3
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
5.3E
21682587
FLEET COPIER
Fleet Copier
Y
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
47.3( uw
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
4.9, E
21682588
CONTRACT/METER USAGE JUNE -
R
contract/meter usage june - july 2020
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
20.1E O
10.4% Sales Tax
>
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
2.1( o
21682591
WATER SEWER COPIER
a
Water Sewer Copier
Q
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
65.2E c
Water Sewer Copier
M
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
65.2.E N
10.4% Sales Tax
c
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
6.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
6.7E U
21682592
PW ADMIN COPIER
+%
PW Office Copier for
(D
001.000.65.518.20.45.00
88.2E E
PW Office Copier for
m
111.000.68.542.90.45.00
49.9E Q
PW Office Copier for
422.000.72.531.90.45.00
49.9E
PW Office Copier for
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
35.2E
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 9
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243124
7/23/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Continued)
PW Office Copier for
E,
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
35.2£
PW Office Copier for
a
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
35.2E L
10.4% Sales Tax
3
001.000.65.518.20.45.00
9.1; c
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.45.00
5.2( Y
10.4% Sales Tax
W
422.000.72.531.90.45.00
5.2( U
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
3.61 R
10.4% Sales Tax
,-
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
3.61
10.4% Sales Tax
>
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
3.6,
21686583
DEV SVCS COPIER - MONTHLY CO
a
Dev Svcs copier - monthly contract/u:
Q
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
445.4E o
10.4% Sales Tax
M
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
46.3, N
Total :
2,663.8E c
243125
7/23/2020 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
ZJD5153
ADOBE ACROBAT PREMIERE PRO
E
Adobe Government Premiere Pro - 1
U
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
391.9(
10.4% Sales Tax
(D
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
40.7E t
ZJM6585
MS SURFACE PRO, DOCKING STAT
m
MS Surface ProBook 450 G7, Covers
Q
001.000.23.512.50.35.00
2,525.0E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.35.00
262.5�
ZJM6810
APC TEMPERATURE SENSOR, UPE
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 10
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
243125
7/23/2020
069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
(Continued)
APC Temperature sensor, UPS Netw(
E,
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
537.9£
10.4% Sales Tax
a
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
55.9E L
ZJV4033
HP 3 YR ONSITE MAINTENANCE A(
3
HP 3 yr Onsite Maintenance agreeme
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
934.8(
10.4% Sales Tax
Y
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
97.2, aa)
Total:
4,846.3: r
E
243126
7/23/2020
065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC
451701-2006
E6GB.SERVICES THRU JUNE 2020
2
E6GB.Services thru June 2020
U
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
4"
496.0( O
Total:
496.0(
0
243127
7/23/2020
019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
16734
EDMONDS PD - LYNNWOOD NARC
a
50% LYNNWOOD NARC SGT - 2ND
Q
001.000.41.521.10.41.50
20,704.0(
16735
INV 16735 1/3 LYNNWOOD SOCIAL
N
1/3 SOCIAL WORKER 2ND QTR 202
A
N
001.000.39.565.40.41.00
14,118.2< c
.5 HOURS OT SW - 2ND QTR 2020
N
001.000.39.565.40.41.00
37.1E E
1/3 SW SUPERVISION BY LCSW
fd
001.000.39.565.40.41.00
U
145.2(
Total:
35,004.6'
E
243128
7/23/2020
075860 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO
S009847207.001
WATER - SAMPLE STATIONS
WATER - SAMPLE STATIONS
r
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
2,203.1 < Q
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
229.1 ,
Total :
2,432.2E
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 11
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
243129 7/23/2020 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC
E7JA & EBJA.Pmt 2
E7JA & EBJA.PMT 2 THRU 6/30/20
r
E7JA.Pmt 2 thru 6/30/20
c
421.000.74.594.34.65.10
418,980.7( �%
E7JA.Ret 2
f°
a
421.000.223.400
-18,975.5� L
EBJA.Pmt 2 thru 6/30/20
.3
421.000.74.594.34.65.10
117,037.2-
E8JA.Pmt 2 ret 6/30/20
421.000.223.400
-5,300.6( Y
Total :
511,741.8( (D
t
243130 7/23/2020 066356 EDMONDS IN BLOOM
2005333.009
REFUND: DONATION: CIVIC FIELD
U
E
REFUND: DONATION: CIVIC FIELD,
001.000.239.200
3,000.0(
Total:
3,000.0( O
243131 7/23/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
6-01127
WWTP: 5/16-7/15/20 METER 2088: ,'
R
0
5/16-7/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METI
a
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
258.2E Q
6-01130
WWTP: 5/16-7/15/20 METER 9439:
5/16-7/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METI
N
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
24.3< N
6-01140
WWTP: 5/16-7/15/20 METER 50104E
r-
5/16-7/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METI
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
3,250.7E E
6-02735
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF
fd
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF
U
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
2,444.0z
6-02736
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH Ab
E
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A�
U
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
13.9-
6-02737
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
Q
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
585.3(
6-02738
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
243131 7/23/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-02825
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-02875
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-02925
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-04127
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-04128
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI-
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TF
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
6-05155
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
6-05156
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
6.2.a
Page: 12
Amoun
c
704.1 ,
�a
a
4,394.9, L
3
24.3(
U
0
1,760.7E u
E
M
1,471.0(
0
R
13.9- o
a
a
Q
191.7f o
N
728.7, N
0
728.7,
2
728.7, U
728.7, (D
E
t
728.7E m
r
Q
1.7z
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243131 7/23/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
243132 7/23/2020 069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC
243133 7/23/2020 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
243134 7/23/2020 077824 FARMER, JAMES R
243135 7/23/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 13
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
c
d
E,
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
6.6(
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
f°
a
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
6.6( L
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
.3
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
6.6(
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
6.5£ Y
Total:
18,816.05 (D
t
247637
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ WHITE LINE
U
E
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ WHITE LINE
M
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
8,236.4(
Freight
O
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
413.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
o
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
899.5, a
Total :
9,548.9' Q
EDH902976
ORDINANCE 4190
N
ordinance 4190
N
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
18.2( c
Total:
18.2( u)
E
2005337.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
200.0(
Total:
200.0( E
t
0895133
WATER INVENTORY/ PARTS
r
WATER INVENTORY
Q
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
2,831.8(
WATER - PARTS
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 555.4
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243135 7/23/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
243136 7/23/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
243137 7/23/2020 075871 FLOW TECHNOLOGIES INC
243138 7/23/2020 077819 GEGAX, MARY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
0896006
WATER INVENTORY - PARTS
WATER INVENTORY - PARTS
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
0897240
WATER INVENTORY
WATER INVENTORY
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
Total
8299713
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.2% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1272
g1111 c1001rlrl
243139 7/23/2020 069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC BINV0008393
Total :
ESJB.SERVICES THRU JUNE 2020
ESJB.Services thru June 2020
423.000.75.594.35.65.30
Total
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Total
WWTP: PO 325 PUMP HEADS, COI\
PO 325 PUMP HEADS, CONECTOR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
6.2.a
Page: 14
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
243139 7/23/2020 069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC (Continued)
243140 7/23/2020 012199 GRAINGER
243141 7/23/2020 012560 HACH COMPANY
243142 7/23/2020 012900 HARRIS FORD INC
243143 7/23/2020 075690 HODGES, BONNIE
9577438691
12032825
196473
196586
2005319.009
PO # Description/Account
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total :
PM SUPPLIES: WATER DETECTOR
PM SUPPLIES: WATER DETECTOR
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
WWTP: NO PO; TOTALALKALINITY
NO PO; TOTAL ALKALI N ITY TNT, CL
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
UNIT 49 - PARTS/ HEATER HOSE
UNIT 49 - PARTS/ HEATER HOSE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
UNIT 527 - PARTS/ ALTERNATOR
UNIT 527 - PARTS/ ALTERNATOR
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION
6.2.a
Page: 15
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 16
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243143
7/23/2020
075690 HODGES, BONNIE
(Continued)
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
m
E,
001.000.239.200
119.0(
2005320.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
f°
a
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
L
001.000.239.200
Total:
130.0( -0
c
�a
243144
7/23/2020
060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
30615
ESJB.SERVICES THRU 6/26/20
Y
ESJB.Services thru 6/26/20
U
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
2,876.3E
ESJB.Services thru 6/26/20
E
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
2,876.3E
ESJB.Services thru 6/26/20
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
2,876.3E o
30616
E7JA.SERVICES THRU 6/26/20
E7JA.Services thru 6/26/20
0
L
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
2,351.8z a
EBJA.Services thru 6/26/20
Q
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
1,158.3 - c
Total :
12,139.2E M
N
243145
7/23/2020
073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
3384982
INDOFF - OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES FROM INDOFF
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
32.8, E
10.4% Sales Tax
fd
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
U
3.4,
3385861
INDOFF OFFICE SUPPLIES
INDOFF OFFICE SUPPLIES
E
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
19.1 z U
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
1.9� Q
Total:
57.4,
243146
7/23/2020
015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC
826909
WWTP: PO 179 SODIUM HYPOCHL
PO 179 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243146 7/23/2020 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC
243147 7/23/2020 077814 JENSEN, PAUL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
WA Hazadous Substance Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
Tota I :
2005325.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Tota I :
243148 7/23/2020 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300489926
243149 7/23/2020 077811 KLARMAN, ROBYN
243150 7/23/2020 077818 KUCZYNSKI, ELONA
243151 7/23/2020 017050 KW ICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH
300489926 - EDMONDS PD
8 OZ HAND SANITIZER - 66
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
HANDELING FEE
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
Total :
2005312.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Total
2005330.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Total
07132020-01 INV 07132020-01 -MAY & JUNE - ED
MAY 2020 CAR WASH CHARGES
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
JUNE 2020 CAR WASH CHARGES
6.2.a
Page: 17
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 18
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243151
7/23/2020
017050 KW ICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
86.1
Total:
162.2'
243152
7/23/2020
074417
LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH
179
CONFLICT COUNSEL - XZ0188077/:
CONFLICT COUNSEL -
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
900.0(
Total :
900.0(
243153
7/23/2020
075474
LEACH, JENNIFER
07/22/2020
CLAIM FOR EXPENSES
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
76.51
Total:
76.5'
243154
7/23/2020
072059
LEE, NICOLE
06162020
INTERPRETER - 9Z0120941
INTERPRETER - 9Z0120941
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
100.0(
Tota I :
100.0(
243155
7/23/2020
077828
LEMASTERS, JACOB
2005341.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
150.0(
Total :
150.0(
243156
7/23/2020
075159
LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER
August Cigna
AUGUST CIGNA PREMIUMS
August Cigna Premiums
811.000.231.550
13,335.5-
Total :
13,335.51
243157
7/23/2020
073226
LIFE LINE SCREENING
2005323.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
450.0(
2005324.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
200.0(
Total :
650.0(
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243158 7/23/2020 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
243159 7/23/2020 077826 MCGILL, KENNEDY
243160 7/23/2020 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
243161 7/23/2020 071950 MCVAY'S MOBILE WELDING LLC
243162 7/23/2020 071538 MILLER, DIANE
243163 7/23/2020 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 19
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
Jul-2020
07-2020 LEGALS FEES
r
07-2020 Legal fees
c
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
49,883.0( �%
Total:
49,883.0( a
m
2005339.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
3
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
150.0(
Total :
150.0( Y
U
42451992
WWTP: PO 339 LOCTITE SEALANT
a)
PO 339 LOCTITE SEALANT
U
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
140.1 E •9
Freight
z
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.2' p
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
15.5' o
Total:
L
164.9( a
a
Q
9676
STREET - MATERIALS & REPAIRS T
STREET - MATERIALS & REPAIRS T
N
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
7,200.0( N
10.4% Sales Tax
r-
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
748.8( N
Total:
7,948.8( E
.R
2005322.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
U
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200 1,083.0( E
Total: 1,083.0(
m
330695 PM SUPPLIES: SERVICE KIT Q
PM SUPPLIES: SERVICE KIT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.9�
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.5E
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 20
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243163
7/23/2020
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
(Continued)
330711
STREET - BRASS WATER RENTAL I
STREET - BRASS WATER RENTAL I
111.000.68.542.61.31.00
29.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.61.31.00
3.1
Tota I :
49.6'
243164
7/23/2020
077829 MOLVIK, SAM
2005342.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
150.0(
Tota I :
150.0(
243165
7/23/2020
072746 MURRAYSMITH INC
15-1715-49
ESKA.SERVICES THRU 6/30/20
ESKA.Services thru 6/30/20
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
2,293.0(
Total :
2,293.0(
243166
7/23/2020
064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
0585440-IN
TRAFFIC - 36" FLAGGER SYMB
TRAFFIC - 36" FLAGGER SYMB
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
97.4E
Freight
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
19.6'
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
12.1(
Total :
129.2:
243167
7/23/2020
068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC
1038819
E172SO - 10' CUSTOM FLATBED
E172SO - 10' CUSTOM FLATBED
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
17,294.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
1,798.5E
Total :
19,092.51
243168
7/23/2020
025690 NOYES, KARIN
000 00 731
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Professional Services: Planning Boai
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 21
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243168
7/23/2020
025690 NOYES, KARIN
(Continued)
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
190.0(
Tota I :
190.0(
243169
7/23/2020
072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
3685-480585
UNIT 32 - PARTS/ DISC PAD SET
UNIT 32 - PARTS/ DISC PAD SET
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
112.8 ,
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
11.7z
3685-481709
FLEET - SUPPLIES/ SPRAY PAINT
FLEET - SUPPLIES/ SPRAY PAINT
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
7.9�
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0.&
Total:
133.4:
243170
7/23/2020
075735 PACIFIC SECURITY
32348
SECURITY FOR JUNE 2020
SECURITY FOR JUNE 2020
001.000.23.512.50.41.00
4,149.9E
Tota I :
4,149.9E
243171
7/23/2020
077496 PAVIA SYSTEMS INC
2581
ESJB.HEADLIGHT SUBSCRIPTION,
ESJB.Headlight Subscription
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
2,168.0(
ESJB.Headlight Subscription
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
2,168.0(
ESJB.Headlight Subscription
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
2,168.0(
Total:
6,504.0(
243172
7/23/2020
027450 PAWS
JUNE 2020
JUNE 2020 - EDMONDS PD
12 ANIMALS @ $205EA -$170 RCLIV
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
2,290.0(
Total :
2,290.0(
243173
7/23/2020
076857 PERFORMANCE INFO TECHNOLOGIES
1673
WWTP: TO 1.2020 & 2.2020 - 4/20-6.
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
243173 7/23/2020 076857 PERFORMANCE INFO TECHNOLOGIES (Continued)
243174 7/23/2020 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC
243175 7/23/2020 069322 PETERSEN BROTHERS INC
243176 7/23/2020 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
243177 7/23/2020 073231 POLYDYNE INC
243178 7/23/2020 077822 POOL, ANNIE
37030
ON25634
ON29363
1467872
2005335.009
PO # Description/Account
TO 1.2020 & 2.2020 - 4/20-6/30/20
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
INV 37030 EDMONDS PD - PEP BILI
WEB -BASED PEP TESTS JUNE 202
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Total
MEADOWDALE RD & 75TH GUARDI
MEADOWDALE RD & 75TH GUARDI
111.000.68.542.64.48.00
Total
WWTP: PO 338 CORD GRIPS
PO 338 CORD GRIPS
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
WWTP: PO 338. CORD GRIPS
Cord grips.
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
WWTP: PO 266 POLYMER (CLARIFI
PO 266 POLYMER (CLARIFLOC)
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
Total
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
6.2.a
Page: 22
Amoun
c
4,950.0( �%
4,950.0( a
m
L
3
40.0(
40.0( Y
U
m
t
U
11,654.6( •9
11,654.6( Z
4-
0
R
0
48.6� a
a
Q
5.0E
0
N
M
48.6�
0
5.0E E
107.5( .�
1,148.1E Q
12,188.1(
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243178 7/23/2020 077822 POOL, ANNIE
243179 7/23/2020 077830 PRICE, JARED
243180 7/23/2020 075770 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC
243181 7/23/2020 075753 RADWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.239.200
Tota I :
2005343.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Total
7900 0440 8030 3286
31473508
243182 7/23/2020 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 53779
243183 7/23/2020 072725 SAGACITY CUSTOM PUBLISHING 2020-22883
QUADIENT
QUADIANT PAYMENT, MAIL POSTA(
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
Total
WWTP: PO 328 FUSE & FUSE REDI
PO 328 FUSE & FUSE REDUCER
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
E7MA.CONTAMINATED SOIL REMO'
E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal
332.000.64.594.76.41.00
E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal
126.000.64.594.76.41.00
E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal
125.000.64.594.76.41.00
Total
TOURISM AD IN 2020 ISSUE OF WA
Tourism promotion ad in 2020 issue c
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
Total
6.2.a
Page: 23
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243184 7/23/2020 077820 SCHWIERMANN, MICHELLE
243185 7/23/2020 072440 SCORDINO, JOE
243186 7/23/2020 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 24
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
2005332.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
r
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
c
m
E,
001.000.239.200
154.8(
Total:
154.8(
a
(D
26
E7FG.REIMBURSEMENT FOR JUNE
3
E7FG.Reimbursement for June & Jul)
001.000.39.554.90.49.00
840.5,
Total :
840.5'
Y
U
S3-5416869
FLEET - PARTS RETURNED
t
FLEET - PARTS RETURNED
U
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-59.8"
•9
10.4% Sales Tax
z
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-6.2,
0
S3-5522833
UNIT 29 - PARTS/ SPARK PLUGS
R
UNIT 29 - PARTS/ SPARK PLUGS
>
0
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
36.9E
a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-5540791
UNIT 502 - PARTS/ ANTI -FREEZE
N
UNIT 502 - PARTS/ ANTI -FREEZE
M
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
18.1 E
N
r�
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
1.8�
E
S3-5557467
UNIT 2 - PARTS/ ALTERNATOR
fd
UNIT 2 - PARTS/ ALTERNATOR
U
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
155.6E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
16.2(
U
S3-5558043
UNIT 44 - PARTS
f°
UNIT 44 - PARTS
Q
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 23.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.4(
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 25
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
243186
7/23/2020
066964 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC (Continued)
Total :
192.1
m
243187
7/23/2020
077069 SEMACONNECT INC
NWS-2007027
CITY WIDE - NETWORK SERVICE F
E
CITY WIDE - NETWORK SERVICE F
sa
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
a
1,440.0( m
Total :
1,440.0( 3
243188
7/23/2020
068132 SHORELINE CONSTRUCTION CO
ESJB.Pmt 13
ESJB.PMT 13 THRU 6/30/20
c
ESJB.Pmt 13 thru 6/30/20
N
421.000.74.594.34.65.10
221,979.5<
ESJB.Pmt 13 thru 6/30/20
t
422.000.72.594.31.65.20
1911858.3< U
ESJB.Pmt 13 thru 6/30/20
423.000.75.594.35.65.30
ii
61,332.5< U
ESJB.Pmt 13 thru 6/30/20
0
112.000.68.595.61.65.00
65,245.0( R
Total:
540,415.35 0
L
Q
243189
7/23/2020
077831 SIAHAAN, ADRIANNE
2005344.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
Q
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
v
001.000.239.200
150.0( N
Total :
150.0( M
N
243190
7/23/2020
072214 SIGMA-ALDRICH INC
550969175
WWTP: NO PO. DEMAND, NUTRIEI`
o
NO PO. DEMAND, NUTRIENTS, ANI,
N
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
600.4(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
17.2-
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
64.2< t
Total:
681.8' m
r
243191
7/23/2020
077821 SILLS, CHRISTINE
2005334.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
Q
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
145.0(
Tota I :
145.0(
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 26
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243192 7/23/2020 077815 SMITH, KASSANDRA
2005326.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
r
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
c
m
E,
001.000.239.200
145.0(
Total:
145.0( a
m
243193 7/23/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
200496834
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
3
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
67.6,
200650851
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
Y
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
16.5(
200723021
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
32.5(
201383270
CITY PARK GAZEBO
o
CITY PARK GAZEBO
R
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
18.8� o
L
201431236
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILY
a
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILY
Q
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
17.7z o
201441755
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
N
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
M
N
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
177.3E c
201790003
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
N
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
E
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
19.3, 2
202114484
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
72.2E E
202289450
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
U
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
f°
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
84.4, Q
203097787
WWTP: 6/17-7/17/20 METER 10001�
6/17-7/17/20 200 2ND AVE S / METE
423.000.76.535.80.47.61
26,493.0E
204425847
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243193
7/23/2020
037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
(Continued)
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
54.7,
220547574
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
74.8�
221732084
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
106.5,
Total :
27,235.8!
243194
7/23/2020
006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
77266
PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES
PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,002.0(
Total:
1,002.0(
243195
7/23/2020
038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
90921/4
FAC MAINT - WORK WEAR D. HOU;
FAC MAINT- WORK WEAR D. HOU;
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
41.5:
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
4.3,
Total:
45.8°
243196
7/23/2020
076114 SOUND SALMON SOLUTIONS
1231
EDMONDS FOREST STEWARDS St
EDMONDS FOREST STEWARDS St
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
1,250.0(
Tota I :
1,250.0(
243197
7/23/2020
071585 STERICYCLE INC
3005163338
INV 3005163338 - CUST 6076358 - E
3 DISPOSALS 6/01/20
001.000.41.521.80.41.00
31.OF
Total :
31.O1
243198
7/23/2020
077312 SUBMITTABLE
109609
EAC: SUBMITTABLE ONLINE SUBM
EAC: SUBMITTABLE ONLINE SUBM
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
240.0(
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 28
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
243198
7/23/2020
077312 077312 SUBMITTABLE
(Continued)
Total :
240.0(
243199
7/23/2020
065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC
25153
SEWER - ENGINEERING FIELD SEF
SEWER - ENGINEERING FIELD SEF
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
744.5(
Total :
744.5(
243200
7/23/2020
040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
18281802
WWTP: PO 340 HEX CAP SCREWS
PO 340 HEX CAP SCREWS, NUTS,
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
144.8,
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
15.0E
Total :
159.8f
243201
7/23/2020
065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION
DH-11843419
PW ADMIN - 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTIO
PW ADMIN - 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTIO
001.000.65.518.20.49.00
265.9,
Total :
265.9,
243202
7/23/2020
075587 THE UPS STORE #6392
0020
WWTP: 6/4/20 SHIP CHGS
2 6/4/20 Ship Charges: $10.95 & $47
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
57.9 ,
Total :
57.9 j
243203
7/23/2020
077823 THORNTON, VALDINE
2005336.009
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
200.0(
Total :
200.0(
243204
7/23/2020
077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
104641
STORM - DUMP FEES
STORM - DUMP FEES
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
714.2E
Total :
714.2'
243205
7/23/2020
064423 USA BLUE BOOK
290307
WWTP: PO 333 SIGNS, PH 4, 7&10
PO 333 SIGNS, PH 4, 7&10 BUFFER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
242.8,
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 29
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243205
7/23/2020
064423 USA BLUE BOOK
(Continued)
Freight
E,
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
4.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
a
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
25.7E L
Total:
273.1
243206
7/23/2020
067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
9858609946
C/A 671247844-00001
ea
Cell Service Fac-Maint
Y
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
104.0, u
Cell Service-PD
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
311.5E E
Cell Service-PW Street/Storm
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
_M
20.1,
Cell Service-PW Street/Storm
O
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
20.1,
Cell Service-PW Water
o
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
20.1, a
Cell Service-PW Sewer
Q
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
40.3z o
Cell Service-WWTP
N
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
ch
20.1 � N
Total :
536.6: c
243207
7/23/2020
069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC
8801554476
WWTP: NO PO, FLASK & FUNNEL
E
NO PO, FLASK & FUNNEL
fd
U
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
289.6"
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
30.1 , E
8801587549
WWTP: NO PO. FUNNEL BUCHNER
U
NO PO. FUNNEL BUCHNER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
88.0E Q
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.1 E
Total:
416.91
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243208 7/23/2020 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
243209
243210
243211
243212
7/23/2020 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
201134429
65430
65449
7/23/2020 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 07212020-CARES
7/23/2020 077720 WEISBROD, KYLE
7/23/2020 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
2005329.009
7839
6.2.a
Page: 30
PO # Description/Account Amoun
INV 201134429 BLEA 806 - SANCHE
SANCHEZ BLEA 806 - 2ND PAYMEN
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
3,102.0(
�%
TRIMBLE BLEA 806 - 2ND PAYMENT
f°
a
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
3,102.0(
L
Total :
6,204.0(
.3
INV 65430 - EDMONDS PD - CS 20--
ea
TOW SILVER CHRYSLER - CS 20-1(
Y
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
184.0(
U
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.3''
E
INV 65449 - EDMONDS PD - CS 20--
TOW WHITE FORD - CS 20-16075
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
184.0(
O
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.3,
o
Total:
406.6E
a
Q
HOUSING AND SUPPLEMENTAL RE
Housing and Supplemental Relief GrE
N
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
8,414.5"
N
Total :
8,414.51
c
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
E
E
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
M
001.000.239.200
440.0(
U
Total:
440.0(
C
m
BUSINESS CARDS - COMMUNITY S
t
business cards for mindy woods, corr
r
001.000.61.557.20.49.00 66.7.E Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.49.00 6.9z
Total : 73.65
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 31
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
243213 7/23/2020 077812 WEST, TODD
2005313.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
r
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
c
m
E,
001.000.239.200
112.0(
Total:
112.0( a
m
243214 7/23/2020 077813 WIGGIN, KYRA
2005318.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
3
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
254.0(
2005321.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
Y
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
U
001.000.239.200
23.0(
Total:
277.0( E
243215 7/23/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
425-697-6502
MUSEUM ALARM LINES - 118 5TH P
R
U
Museum Alarm Lines - 118 5th Ave N
o
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
107.9 R
425-712-0417
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
>
0
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
a
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
36.1 � Q
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
36.1 � N
425-712-8251
PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX,
A
N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
17.1- N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
E
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
85.5' fd
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
U
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
71.8z y
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
E
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
71.8z U
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
f°
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
95.7E Q
425-775-2455
CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5
CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
68.1 z
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 :13 :20 P M
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
243215 7/23/2020 011900 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
243216 7/23/2020 077817 ZWIREN, NOAH
110 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
110 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.a
Page: 32
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued) Total : 590.5!
0
2005328.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( E
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( sa
a
001.000.239.200 35.0( m
Total: 35.0( 3
Bank total : 1,606,918.15 c
�a
Total vouchers : 1,606,918.15
m
t
U
E
2
U
4-
0
M
0
L
Q
El
O
N
M
N
O
N
E
M
V
C
d
E
M
V
f0
r
Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 68
6.2.b
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 : 43 : 00 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7232020 7/23/2020 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
0
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
1522 1522 SHANNON BURLEY CREDIT C
d
WRPA: WEBINAR REGISTRATION: I
E
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
10.0(
WRPA: WEBINAR REGISTRATION: i
001.000.64.571.28.49.00
m
20.0( 3
WRPA: WEBINAR REGISTRATION: i
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
10.0(
ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE
N
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
39.0<
1880 1880 PARKS CREDIT CARD
t
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: DRY E
U
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
34.2( •Fa
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: DRY E
U
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
21.5' o
POLL UNIT: DISCOVERY: BIRD FES
'R
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
65.0( o
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COPY P)
L
Q.
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
a
46.3E Q
AMAZON: COVID SUPPLIES: THERI
c
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
14.2< N
AMAZON: DISCOVERY: CAMP SUPI
N
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
430.7, c
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: LABLES
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
L
AMAZON: COVID SUPPLIES: LAMIN
};
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
36.5, y
AMAZON: GYMNASTICS: CAMP SUI
E
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
t
21.8, u
AMAZON: DISCOVERY UNIFORMS:
001.000.64.571.23.24.00 66.2, Q
AMAZON: GYMNASTICS: CAMP SUI
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 200.1,
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: PENS, C
001.000.64.571.22.31.00 28.61
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 : 43 : 00 P M
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7232020 7/23/2020 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.b
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
AMAZON: COVID SUPPLIES: LAMIN
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
78.7( E
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: KEYB(
�a
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
40.81
PICKLEBALL CENTRAL: PICKLEBAI
L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
397.4,
PICKLEBALL CENTRAL: PICKLEBAI
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
R
640.2E N
5919
5919 FRANCES CHAPIN CREDIT C/
NEWEGG: WOTS SUPPLIES: WEB(
t
117.100.64.573.20.35.00
314.7E U
8305
WILLIAMS CC - 7/06/2020
E
ZOOM - SUBSCRIPTION FOR PHIL
U
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
82.7E o
APPLE ITUNES - MONTHLY CHARG
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
0.9� p
8474
8474 JESSE CURRAN CREDIT CAR
Q.
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: COPY PA[
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
44.1
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SLUG KIL
N
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
167.01 N
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GARBAGE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2,539.2(
AMAZON: PM COVID SUPPLIES: FL
3
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
228.8(
AMAZON: PM COVID SUPPLIES: RE
a�
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
20.9, E
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FABRIC D
t
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
59.6,
AMAZON: PM COVID SUPPLIES: NE
Q
�Ir1�iPI�•'1�'1/L:1fZiZc3�ilr �I
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LATEX PR
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 47.4E
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: I -PHONE i
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
07/23/2020 12 : 43 : 00 P M
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7232020 7/23/2020 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6.2.b
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
75.6£
AMAZON: PM COVID SUPPLIES: CA
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
386.3,
Total:
6,321.71,
L_
Bank total :
6,321.71,
3
Total vouchers :
6,321.71,
c
R
N
m
t
U
E
M
U
4-
0
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 71
El
O
N
M
N
O
d
L
3
c
a�
E
s
Q
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6J13
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
STR
2019 Downtown Parking Study
s021
E9AC
Q'
STR
2019 Guardrail Install
i039
E9AB
a�
L_
STR
2019 Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
3
STR
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
i041
E9DB
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project (Phase 7)
c516
EBGA
Y
U
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
E
STR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
U
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
o
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
EBJB
c
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
L
a
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement (Phase10)
c498
E7JA
Q
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
N
M
STR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
N
ti
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
L
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
M
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
z
STR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
o
STR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
m
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
a�
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
a
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
a�
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
a�
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
E
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
Q
STR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
EODC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
Revised 7/22/2020
Packet Pg. 72
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
sol 1
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STIR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
c
m
E
M
Q.
a�
L
3
c
M
Y
V
N
t
E
U
4-
0
0
L
Q
om
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 73
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STIR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STIR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STIR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STIR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
STIR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
m
STIR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
�,
STIR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
M
Q'
a�
L
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
3
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
M
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
Y
U
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
E
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
U
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
c
STIR
E1 CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
>
0
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
a
a
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
Q
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
N
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
N
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
ti
c
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
E
0
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
Z
0
L
STIR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
a
STIR
ESDA
c474
Bikelink Project
m
STIR
ESDB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c
STM
ESFD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
a
SWR
ESGB
sol 1
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
u_
WWTP
ESHA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c
WTR
ESJB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
E
WTR
ESKA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
Q
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
Revised 7/22/2020
Packet Pg. 74
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering Proiect
Proiect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
WTR
E6J13
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i005 Iff
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E7DC
.W&
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM
E7FB
StorkDrain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
MOP
E7AJ
Ir
2019 Waterline Replacement
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
E8
220th Adaptiv
STR
E8CA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
E8CC
K-031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STIR
E8DB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
' 37
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STM
E8FA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
6
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
s020
2019 Utility RaUMMFC Update
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
ir i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STIR
E9AB
i039
2019 Guardrail Install
s021
2019 Downtown Parking Study
STIR
HAD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i036
2019 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STIR
E9DB
i041
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
_
STIR
E9DC
im
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 75
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
PM
EBMA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1 CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
>,
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
M
Q'
a�
L
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
3
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
M
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Y
STIR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
ESKA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
E
STIR
ESDA
c474
Bikelink Project
U
STIR
ESDB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c
STM
ESFD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
>
0
WWTP
ESHA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
a
a
WTR
ESJB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
Q
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
N
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
N
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
ti
c
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
E
0
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
Z
0
L
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
a
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
SWR
EBGA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c
STM
EBFB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
a
WTR
EBJA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
u_
STM
EBFC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
E
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
Q
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
WTR
E6JB
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 76
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STR
EBAB
i028
220th Adaptive
STR
EBCA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
>,
STR
EBCC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
M
Q'
a�
L
STR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
3
STR
E9CA
i036
2019 Overlay Program
M
STR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
Y
U
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STR
E9AB
i039
2019 Guardrail Install
E
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
U
STR
E9DB
i041
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
c
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
>
0
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
a
a
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
Q
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
N
STR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
N
STR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
ti
c
STR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
E
0
STR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
Z
0
L
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
a
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
c
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
a
SWR
ESGB
sol l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
LL
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
c
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
E
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s02O
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
Q
STR
E9AC
s021
2019 Downtown Parking Study
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
STR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 77
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
STM
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STR
2019 Downtown Parking Study
s021
E9AC
STR
2019 Guardrail Install
i039
E9AB
STR
2019 Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
STR
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
i041
E9DB
STR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
c
m
E
M
a�
L
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
t
E
U
w
0
0
L
a
a
i
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 78
6.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
ElCA
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STIR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
EODC
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STIR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0l l
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s02O
EBJB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6JB
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
c
m
E
M
a�
L
3
c
M
Y
V
N
t
E
w
0
0
L
a
a
i
Revised 7/22/2020 Packet Pg. 79
6.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Proposal to extend the Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Pamela Randolph
Background/History
On July 21, 2020 this item was forwarded, by City Council to the Consent Agenda at the Business
meeting on July 28, 2020.
On July 16, 2019, the City Council approved the Departments request to fill the "Program Administrator
position at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The request was presented to the Parks & Public Works and Finance Committee with Personnel
Committee concurrence on July 9, 2019.
On August 1, 2019 the Program Administrator position at the Wastewater Treatment Plant was filled by
the use of Personal Service Contract. The contract will expire on July 31, 2020 unless extended by City
Council. The terms of an extension were to be based upon successful evaluation of performance and
the efficacy of the position. A Satisfactory Performance evaluation was completed On July 1 and the
efficacy of the position was evaluated on July 13, 2020.
Staff Recommendation
Public Works Director and Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager recommend the extension of the
Personal Service Contract through December 31, 2019.
Narrative
The Public Works Department and the Division of Wastewater treatment is requesting to extend the
existing Personal Service Contract with Michael Derrick through the end of 2020 to ensure continuity of
service.
The position became essential when the Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor position remained
unfilled. In 2019, it was determined that continuing to advertise for the Supervisor position was
resulting in a stagnant recruitment process that did not produce viable candidates. However, an
experienced manager from the wastewater collection sector was available to help at the plant as a
Program Administrator. Therefore, advertisements for Plant Supervisor were suspended until a future
date.
Packet Pg. 80
6.3
The Program Administrator contract is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2020 unless extended by City
Council. The terms of an extension were to be based upon a successful evaluation of previous
performance and the benefits the City derives from the position. This Performance evaluation was
completed On July 1 and the position evaluation on July 13, 2020. Both were positive. The budget for
this extension exists but a contract extension is needed. The position currently costs $98,129/year plus
benefits.
The Wastewater Department is in the process of evaluating and developing a viable organizational
structure that will support our future needs. This plan will be presented to the City Council in August of
2020.
Attachments:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Packet Pg. 81
6.3.a
City of Attachment 1
EDMONDS
Washington
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Program Administrator
Department: Public Works — Wastewater Treatment
Bargaining Unit: Contract Position FLSA Status: Exempt
Creation Date: July 2019 Reports To: WWTP Manager
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general direction, plans, organizes and coordinates programs in support of the
City's Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Is responsible for implementing the WWTP's safety program and
nurturing a culture of safety first; responsible for development and implementation of policies and procedure
designed to improve efficiency of operation and promote fiscal responsibility. Additional responsibilities include
oversight of the plant asset management program utilizing the established records management system and
assisting with the development and management of capital projects. Assists Manager in preparation and
monitoring of the annual operating budget, Capital Improvement Program and when assigned, performs the
duties of the WWTP Manager.
Scope of duties.
• Plan, organize, and coordinate a variety of programs, projects and activities to the operation and
maintenance of the City's wastewater treatment plant.
• Oversee the maintenance management system and asset management program.
• Act as management lead on the WWTP safety committee.
• During periods of absence assumes Manager Roles and responsibilities.
• Prepare and maintain a variety of reports, records and files related to assigned activities.
• Provide input to Manager for the O&M budget process, recommend and plan capital projects, control
and authorize expenditures in accordance with established limitations.
• Administer Capital Improvement projects, make recommendations to Manager, may prepare, advertise,
receive and recommend award bids according to established procedures and oversee projects.
• Communicate with personnel and outside organizations to coordinate activities and programs, resolve
issues and conflicts and exchange information.
• Provide technical expertise, information and assistance to the Manager regarding assigned functions,
assist as needed in the formulation and development of policies, procedures and programs.
• Operate a computer and other office equipment as assigned, maintain current knowledge of plant
instrumentation and control systems, drive a vehicle to various sites to inspect work.
• Attend and conduct a variety of meetings as assigned, represent the City at a variety of meetings.
• Perform related duties as assigned.
Required Knowledge of:
• Maintenance and asset management industry standards.
• Industry standards related to the operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants.
• Effective and efficient maintenance of wastewater plant assets.
• Permit requirements.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator Packet Pg. 82
6.3.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
• Applicable laws, codes, regulations, policies and procedures related to the operation and maintenance of
wastewater treatment plants.
• Conflict resolution techniques.
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy.
• Health and safety standards, rules and regulations.
• Budget preparation and control.
• Labor Relations and contract administration.
• Oral and written communication skills.
• Record keeping techniques.
• Operation of a computer and assigned software.
• Supervisory and training principles, methods and techniques.
Required Skill in:
• Planning, organizing and coordinating the operations and maintenance activities of a municipal Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
• Ensure requirements and permits comply with local, state and federal agencies.
• Supervise and evaluate the performance of assigned staff.
• Evaluating work practices of operations, maintenance and laboratory departments to implement current
industry standards.
• Plan plant projects to allocate staffing, timelines and budget.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing.
• Interpret, apply and explain rules, regulation, policies and procedures.
• Establishing and maintaining cooperative and effective working relationships with others.
• Operate a computer and assigned office equipment.
• Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
• Meet schedules and timelines.
• Work independently with little direction.
• Plan and organize work.
• Preparing and maintaining a variety of comprehensive records, files, and reports.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration or Business Administration, or related field and five years of
experience managing and implementing programs or policies developed by others and two years of staff
supervisory responsibility; preferably in a municipal or public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination
of education, training and experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
State of Washington Driver's License
CPR and First Aid card, within 6 months of hire
Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check
Other Requirements:
Ability to pass a mandatory drug test upon conditional job offer.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Packet Pg. 83
6.3.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Indoor/outdoor work environment
• Driving a vehicle to conduct work
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Operate a variety of grounds equipment and power and hand tools.
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Read a variety of materials and possess close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night
vision and color vision.
• Ascending/descending ladders
• Lifting/ carrying or otherwise move or transport heavy objects frequently up to 50lbs.
• Sitting/standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time
• Walking or otherwise moving over rough or uneven surfaces while performing inspections and
investigations.
• Performing repetitive motions, including balancing, stooping, kneeling, bending, crouching, crawling,
reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, and standing, pushing, pulling and using
stairs.
• Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy.
Hazards:
• Exposure to chemicals, used in Wastewater treatment such as Sodium Hypochlorite, Caustic Soda,
Bisulfate, Polymers, Clay, Lime and Carbon.
• Exposure to raw and treated sewage, odors associated with sewage treatment, high heat and moving
equipment.
• Exposure to cleaning chemicals, herbicides and dust.
• Working at heights using ladders and structures
• Working around and with sometimes noisy machinery having moving parts
• Exposure to slippery surfaces, damp spaces while cleaning in and around equipment.
• Exposure to electrical power supply and high voltage.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Packet Pg. 84
6.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
June 2020 Quarterly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
A financial presentation will be given at next week's Council meeting where staff will present and
discuss this information. We are including the June Financial/Budgetary report on the Consent Agenda a
week early, in an effort to share this information with Council and the public as quickly as possible. We
look forward to presenting next week.
Attachments:
Complete June Quarterly Financial Report
Jan -June P&L
Packet Pg. 85
6.4.a
INSIDE THIS
ISSUE:
Revenues By Fund
Summary
Expenditures By
Fund Summary
General Fund
Revenues
Expenditures By
Fund Detail
Gen. Fund Depart-
ment Expenditures
Investment Portfolio
Fund Balance
Overview
Below: During the
first quarter of 2020 a
pandemic emerged,
threating the health
and economic vitality
of people around the
world.
1
Summary of Operating Funds: Revenues
2
6
32
9
The Financial Management Report is a summary of the City's
preliminary operating results for the six months ended June 30,2020.
Revenue Highlights:
• As we know, the coronavirus pan-
demic has had devastating effects
on the local and national economy,
with many area governments ex-
periencing revenue declines of
15% or more. Fortunately, Ed-
monds is faring better than most of
our neighbors. While overall City-
wide revenues are behind last
year's pace by $1.4 million, this
represents only a 3% decrease
compared to the same period last
year. (page 1).
• Collections of Retail Sales Taxes,
the City revenue most affected by
the pandemic, are only behind last
year at this time by $310,089, and
with collections of $3.8 million
y are only 5.7% behind the 2020
budget (page 3).
Above: The Edmonds City Council begins to meet
"virtually" to transact City business, in recognition
of a "Stay Home, Stay Healthy" order by Governor
Inslee. This allowed Councilmembers to attend
meetings from their home, office, or other place
away from Council Chambers.
General Fund revenues are lower than last
year at this time in the categories of Tax-
es; Intergovernmental revenues; Charges
for Goods and Services, Fines and Penal-
ties; and Other Miscellaneous revenues.
Revenues by Category: Real Estate sales remain strong. 2020
General Fund revenues for Q 1-2 REET Revenues for the first six months
2020 are higher than Q 1-2 2019 in are $20,990 (2%) ahead of budget.
the category of Licenses and Permits.
Considering the devastating effect the
Coronavirus has had on the regional and
national economies, Edmonds' revenue
situation is very favorable by comparison.
j ■ A more detailed breakdown of infor-
mation for City revenues can be found be-
ginning on page 3.
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of June 3Q- 2020
Packet Pg. 86
Summary of Operating Funds: Expenditures
• General Fund expenditures for the
six months ended June 30 are
I $3.7 million, or a full 15% under
Right:
the budgeted amount, a good sign
People wearing
I that the city will be able to live
masks when out in
public is becoming a
within its means during the cur -
common sight.
rent recession. By comparison, for
I the same period last year General
Fund expenditures were $1.5 mil-
lion, or 5% under budget.
IGeneral Fund expenses by sub -
fund and line item categories are
I on page 6 and expenses by depart-
ment are on pages 13-16. Every
department in the General Fund is
I reasonably at or near budget at
June 30, and the General Fund as
a whole has spent only 43% of
their annual budget. This same
Below: Angie Feser
information can be found in
was confirmed as
graphical form on pages 23-31.
the new Edmonds
Parks, Recreation
I
and Cultural Ser-
Special Revenue Funds during
vices Director in
the first half of the year have
February. Ms. Feser
I only spent 28% of their annual
had previously held
a similar position at
expense budget. This is partly
the City of
because most of our construc-
Sammamish. Her
tion work does not begin until
first day at Edmonds
late Spring or early Summer,
was April 1.
I but it is also a result of a major
capital project —Civic Field —
being put on hold until next year.
Congratulations
Additional Special Revenue Fund
Angie!
I expenditure information can be
found on pages 6-8.
Total fund balances for
the General Fund and Sub -
Washington Cities "Well City Award"
for the third year in a row at the
Healthy Worksite Summit in
Lynnwood.
• Enjoy virtual summer concerts, courte-
sy of the Hazel Miller Foundation and
the Edmonds Arts Commission:
HAZEL MILLER
VIRTUAL SUMMER
rn NIcFeron Band / Folk/Pop Reid gamieson Band 'AcousticJuly 19,10:30am & 4pm Aug 9,10:30am & 4July 21, 4pm Aug 11, 4pmJuly 23,4pm Aug 13,4pm
Ode / Children's Singer & Songwriter jasper Lepak / Folk SJuly 26,10:30am & 4pm Aug 16,10:30am & 4
July 28, 4pm Aug 18, 4pm
July 30, 4pm Aug 20, 4pm
i
I• Work is progressing on the Edmonds
Waterfront Center; Edmonds Parks
Department is looking forward to host- I
ing classes again:
funds at June 30, 2020 is
EDMOND RECREATION&CULTURAL SERVICES '
$17.7 million, or approxi-
mately 36% of the 2020 ex-
I
penditure budget for those
funds.
�TR�1
Other City Highlights
~�
• On March 20, Edmonds
received the Association of
WANTED
Edmonds Waterfront Center
220 Railroad Ave, Edmonds
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of June 3Q- 2020
Packet Pg. 87
0
a
a�
U
c
c
LL
M
cY
0
N
0
N
C
3
I 6.4.a I
Page 1 of 1
C TTY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Receive,
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 43,803,858
$ 21,254,387
$ 19,628,003
$ 24,175,855
45
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
437,980
212,500
212,500
225,480
49
O l l
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
-
-
-
-
0
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
56,140
-
-
56,140
0
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,230
2,500
2,500
2,730
48
,
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
-
280,187
-
-
0
Q
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
165,390
6,565
63,538
101,852
38
Ill
STREET FUND
1,912,768
915,431
918,085
994,683
48
112
COMBINED STREET CONSTAMPROVE 1
2,747,881
1,029,949
1,337,928
1,409,953
49
_
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
263,576
33,549
25,592
237,984
10
LL
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
750
321
227
523
30
>,
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
98,630
41,318
32,526
66,104
33
L
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
27,270
11,899
10,143
17,127
37
7
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,790
248
153
1,637
9
0
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
34,450
13,327
10,926
23,524
32
p
N
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
1,436,090
684,983
650,150
785,940
45
C
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND
1,453,520
692,113
647,413
806,107
45
127
GIFTS CATALOG FUND
145,050
89,086
44,582
100,468
31
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
184,610
106,412
71,936
112,674
39
G
sZ
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
6,390
2,688
1,871
4,519
29
N
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
54,210
26,026
17,567
36,643
32
.�
V
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,380
6,146
2,616
7,764
25
M
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
79,209
55,330
41,616
37,593
53
mS
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND
-
-
32,334
(32,334)
0
2
L
211
L.I.D. FUND CONTROL
12,400
18,882
12,400
0
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
738,400
53,388
47,291
691,109
6
M
3
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
9,638,306
571,231
576,652
9,061,654
6
y
C
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
71,548
30,710
(30,710)
0
421
WATER UTILITY FUND 2
11,116,270
4,424,375
4,537,881
6,578,389
41
422
STORM UTILITY FUND 2
6,720,466
2,733,283
2,975,121
3,745,345
44
Q.
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND3
25,261,935
6,601,109
6,682,837
18,579,098
26
p
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,100
625,599
616,549
1,371,551
31
V
r
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,746,160
926,862
835,498
910,662
48
d
t
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,202,963
552,522
600,752
602,211
50
tt
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
72,620
51,708
53,140
19,480
73
r�
Q
$ 111,422,792
$ 42,095,471
$ 40,708,636
$ 70,714,156
37
1 Differences primarily due to a large traffice impact fee in 2020.
2 Differences primarily due to a 4.5%increase in water rate, and a 9.5%increase in storm rate.
3 Differences due to contributed capital billings to WWTP partnersin 2020, as well as 5%increase in sewer rate.
1
Packet Pg. 88
I 6.4.a I
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
No. Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001 GENERAL FUND
$ 49,044,056
$ 21,172,989
$ 21,049,664
$ 27,994,392
430/
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
467,140
223,053
152,182
314,958
330i
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
5,533
- 5,900 00/
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
100,000
1,862
- 100,000 00/
019
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
21,555
100,000
- 21,555 00/
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
-
25,966
19,834
570i p
CL
111
STREET FUND
2,199,717
1,015,201
1,128,111
1,071,606
5101 4)
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
2,717,463
483,345
562,208
2,155,255
210r
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
243,880
12,502
12,359
231,521
501
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
128,250
36,521
29,348
98,902
230i C
IL
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
-
-
26,880
00i
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
1,752
450
2,550
L
1501
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
33,900
7,659
2,223
31,677
70i 7
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
3,610,520
510,795
768,193
2,842,327
210i Cy
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND
3,401,093
505,942
955,798
2,445,295
280/ c
N
127
GIFT S CATALOG FUND
113,782
39,882
38,848
74,934
340/ 4)
C
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
195,787
95,383
77,496
118,291
400r
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
-
4,935
-
00/
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
3,318
11
11,889
00i Q.
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
80,510
34,040
33,697
46,813
420i
211
L.I.D. FUND CONTROL
12,400
-
12,400
0°i
V
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
738,400
53,388
47,291
691,109
60i
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
13,013,343
29,543
657,180
12,356,163
501
LL
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
12,809,352
4,613,073
4,878,748
7,930,604
380/ >
L
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
10,831,951
2,062,033
4,060,143
6,771,808
370i
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
32,767,560
4,636,355
5,674,797
27,092,763
to
170/ 7
Cy
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,130
625,592
616,542
1,371,588
310i N
C
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
3,170,398
851,714
439,356
2,731,042
140i
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,454,784
468,592
540,328
914,456
370i
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
78,700
97,548
45,056
33,644
571i Q.
p
$ 139,316,151
$ 37,692,549
$ 419795,994
$ 97,520,157
300i
2
Packet Pg. 89
6.4.a
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2020 Amended 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 4
2 EMSPROPERTY TAX 4
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESfUSE TAX 5
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
8 GASUTILITY TAX
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
10 WATERUTILITY TAX
11 SEWERUTILITYTAX
12 STORMWATER UTILITY TAX
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
15 PULLTABSTAX
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
LIC INS ES AND PERMITS:
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
19 POLICE -FINGERPRINTING
20 AMUSEMENTS
21 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
22 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
23 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
24 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -VERIZON/FRONT IER
25 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
26 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
27 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
28 NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE
29 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
30 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
31 ANIMAL LICENSES
32 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
33 OTRNON-BUSLIC/PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
34 DOI 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
35 WA ASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT
36 TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT
37 DOCKSIE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE
38 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
39 ST AT E GRANT S - BUDGET ONLY
40 PUT) PRIVILEDGE TAX
41 ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT
42 SCHOOL ZONE
43 MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION
44 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM DOE
45 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
46 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
47 MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT
48 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
49 DUI - CITIES
50 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
51 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
52 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS
53 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
54 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
$ 10,737,617
$ 5,634,666
$ 5,253,558
$ 5,484,059
490%
4,112,031
2,178,500
2,051,232
2,060,799
500/(
500
119
13
487
30/(
8,450,000
4,072,013
3,761,924
4,688,076
450/(
7,600
6,468
4,048
3,552
530/c
760,500
385,060
372,180
388,321
490/(
1,684,800
983,768
970,402
714,398
580/( _
579,600
383,777
430,775
148,825
740/(
348,800
175,304
183,318
165,482
530/( Q.
1,148,400
516,780
415,329
733,071
360/( 4)
W1
896,600
416,459
366,461
530,139
410/(
471,900
220,604
210,737
261,163
450/( 2
822,200
397,588
403,384
418,816
490/(
823,900
424,559
361,422
462,478
440/(
55,200
30,413
33,660
21,540
610/( li
40
-
367
(327)
9170/(
280,900
139,010
147,475
133,425
530/(
31,180,588
15,965,086
14,966,286
16,214,302
485%
M
250
60
315
(65)
1260/(
700
310
80
620
110/( p
6,000
4,675
-
6,000
00/( c
50,000
12,478
915
49,085
20/( 04
682,200
336,861
343,270
338,930
5001( C
41,000
20,798
20,271
20,729
490/( 7
100,600
49,632
39,115
61,485
390/(
358,200
77,912
174,817
183,384
490/(
116,300
69,030
115,594
706
990/( 0
63,700
34,640
33,265
30,435
520/( N
64,800
38,100
-
64,800
0°/
13,500
13,460
-
13,500
00/(
675,600
270,359
409,046
266,554
610/(
24,380
7,770
8,089
16,291
330/( ca
45,000
23,830
70,922
(25,922)
1580/( _
18,500
10,965
8,468
10,032
460/( LL
2,260,730
970,879
1,224,166
1,036,564
541% L
N
6,000
3,470
2,052
3,949
340/(
2,285
-
-
0%
Cr
4,000
1,852
-
4,000
00/(
-
2,805
559
(559)
0% C
7,100
-
-
7,100
0%
18,000
-
-
18,000
00/c
210,500
-
-
210,500
0% G1
-
-
3,829
(3,829)
00/, Q-
825
(825)
0% E
13,070
6,100
6,393
6,677
49% V
-
6,453
-
-
00/c
16,740
8,594
8,076
8,664
480/(
45,600
22,004
22,946
22,654
50% E
500
-
-
500
00/(
48,300
30,096
32,974
15,327
680/(
6,000
3,041
2,766
3,234
460/(
Q
231,500
114,594
120,972
110,528
520/(
338,200
170,475
169,254
168,946
5001(
2,000
-
-
00/c
1,000
705
3,057
(2,057)
3060/(
550
-
-
550
00/(
947,060
374,473
373,701
573,359
390%
4 2020 Real Personal/Property Taxesare $(381,108) lower and EMS property taxesare $(127,268) lower than 2019 revenues.
5 2020 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $(310,089) lower than 2019 revenues. Please also seepages pages 18 & 19.
3
Packet Pg. 90
6.4.a
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL
FUND
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
% Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
$ 3,000
$ 1,452
$ 2,218
$ 782
740/(
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
600
218
37
563
60/(
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
11,000
7,246
3,973
7,027
360/(
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
300
74
7
293
20/(
5 D/M COURT REC SER
300
37
47
253
160/(
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
-
-
235
(235)
00/(
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
11,000
5,936
2,161
8,839
200/(
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
1,000
733
382
618
380/(
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
100
158
13
87
_
130/(
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
100
32
9
91
90/( 00.
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKINGPERMITS
25,100
-
-
25,100
00/( O
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
600
-
-
600
00/c
13 PHOTOCOPIES
1,000
471
373
627
370/( .�
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
500
-
-
500
00/(
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
125,000
86,372
156,560
(31,560)
1250/(
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES
1,400
-
-
1,400
00/(
17 SNO-ISLE
85,000
47,079
47,873
37,127
560/(
18 P ASSP ORT S AND NAT URALIZAT ION FEES
21,000
13,120
5,795
15,205
280/(
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
30,000
5,444
-
30,000
00/(
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
126,800
39,524
36,753
90,047
290/( 3
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
195,000
115,333
99,430
95,571
51% Cy
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
-
2
21
(21)
00/( O
23 FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI
-
117
-
-
0% p
24 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
52,500
30,727
34,273
18,227
650/( N
25 LEGAL SERVICES
1,050
1,049
325
725
310/(
26 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
45,000
22,585
19,272
25,728
430/c
27 BOOKINGFEES
3,000
1,722
1,448
1,552
480/(
28 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
10,000
9,100
12,579
(2,579)
126%
29 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
3,500
3,525
1,870
1,630
530/( Q.
30 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
1,007,500
534,096
504,820
502,680
5001, aN
31 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
2,500
629
1,551
949
620/(
32 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
50
100
-
50
0°/
33 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
72,600
54,685
44,400
28,200
610/,
34 PLAN CHECKING FEES
375,900
311,975
147,519
228,381
390/( ca
35 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
4,000
5,295
12,126
(8,126)
3030/, _
36 PLANNING 1%INSPECTION FEE
500
-
-
500
00/c LL
37 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
5,000
3,850
1,480
3,520
300/(
38 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
14,000
8,975
9,212
4,788
660/,
39 DV COORDINATOR SERVICES
-
4,707
-
-
00/( c0
40 GYM AND WEIGHT ROOM FEES
15,500
6,143
3,083
12,417
200/( Cr
41 PROGRAM FEES 6
869,162
503,818
93,767
775,395
110/( C
42 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
1,300
552
-
1,300
00/(
43 WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES
5,000
1,100
1,110
3,890
220/(
44 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
800
-
-
800
00/(
45 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
3,290,838
1,442,329
1,402,370
1,888,468
430/( Q.
6,418,500
3,270,311
2,647,090
3,771,410
41% E
O
t�
r
C
d
z
tt
to
r�
r�
a
6 2020 Parks & Recreation Program Revenues are $(410,051) lower than 2019 revenues.
4
Packet Pg. 91 1
6.4.a
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2020 Amended 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHERINFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKINGINFRACTION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN
14 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
15 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
16 CRIM CONV FEE CT
17 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
18 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
19 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
20 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
21 CRIM CONV FEE CN
22 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
23 BANK CHARGE FOR CONY. DEFENDANT
24 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
25 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
26 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
MISCELLANEOUS:
27 INVESTMENT INTEREST
28 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
29 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
30 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS
31 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
32 LEASESLONG-TERM
33 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
34 PARKSDONATIONS
35 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
36 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
37 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
38 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
39 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
40 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
41 POLICE JUDGMENT SiRESTITUTION
42 CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORTAGES
43 OTHER MISC REVENUES
44 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
45 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
46 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
47 NSF FEE - DEVEL SERV DEPT
48 US BANK REBATE
TRANSFERS -IN:
49 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM 511
50 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$ 4,000 $
1,941 $
536 $
3,464
130/(
241,000
120,697
57,355
183,645
240/(
19,000
9,992
6,589
12,411
350/(
20,000
9,132
4,861
15,139
240/(
1,000
1,371
200
800
200/(
2,000
1,022
503
1,497
250/(
147,000
73,334
39,103
107,897
270/(
2,500
1,358
405
2,095
160/(
7,000
4,439
4,812
2,188
690/(
700
266
125
575
180/(
200
45
33
167
160/(
1,500
1,063
1,160
340
770/(
140
-
-
140
00/(
30,000
17,524
10,751
19,249
360/(
3,600
1,516
1,102
2,498
310/(
1,000
384
265
735
270/(
100
(2,792)
37
63
370/(
13,100
6,699
5,120
7,980
390/(
600
140
473
127
790/(
1,600
573
457
1,143
290/(
500
219
82
418
160/(
16,000
7,197
4,102
11,898
260/(
14,000
7,284
4,441
9,559
320/(
6,000
2,486
1,069
4,931
180/(
10,100
5,150
-
10,100
00/(
300
1,208
-
300
00/(
542,940
272,250
143,579
399,361
265%
399,400
180,170
130,726
268,674
330/(
53,440
15,918
8,925
44,515
170/(
50,950
4,661
4,246
46,704
80/(
153,000
58,641
19,641
133,359
130/(
2,100
1,210
380
1,720
180/(
205,000
100,882
75,559
129,441
370/(
22,500
3,473
160
22,340
10/(
3,500
350
920
2,580
260/(
2,000
820
535
1,465
270/(
5,000
7,618
100
4,900
20/(
300
68
-
300
00/(
3,000
1,392
-
3,000
00/(
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/(
2,000
3
1,344
656
670/(
200
389
208
(8)
1040/(
-
(162)
16
(16)
00/(
5,000
7,310
6,611
(1,611)
1320/(
100
40
18
82
180/(
100
-
-
100
00/(
150
108
107
43
720/(
-
30
(30)
00/(
8,500
5,348
5,754
2,746
680/(
918,240
388,238
255,281
662,959
289/(
1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 00
35,800 13,150 17,900 17,900 5001(
1,535,800 13,150 17,900 1,517,900 ION
$ 43,803,858 $ 21,254,387 $ 199628,003 $ 24,175,855 450%
F
O
CL
O
R
C
to
C
IL
a
L
O
M
3
C1
0
N
0
N
O
C
7
5
Packet Pg. 92
I 6.4.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 17,066,688
$ 7,789,352
$ 8,216,712
$ 8,849,976
48
2 OVERTIME
491,580
412,940
271,204
220,376
55
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
262,020
7,053
1,450
260,570
1
4 BENEFITS
6,599,678
3,060,818
3,142,267
3,457,411
48
5 UNIFORMS
90,975
56,064
58,130
32,845
64
6 SUPPLIES
428,811
246,679
239,376
189,435
56
7 SMALL EQUIPMENT
161,262
95,121
57,597
103,665
36
8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,407,641
6,573,386
6,290,476
9,117,165
41
9 COMMUNICATIONS
169,795
65,693
72,064
97,731
42
10 TRAVEL
78,580
41,570
5,065
73,515
6
11 EXCISE TAXES
6,500
1,481
5,244
1,256
81
12 RENTAL/LEASE
1,825,110
926,590
901,636
923,474
49
13 INSURANCE
394,124
436,448
393,746
378
100
14 UTILITIES
531,525
235,466
231,236
300,289
44
15 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
297,010
282,324
339,062
(42,052)
114
16 MISCELLANEOUS
526,991
234,402
222,030
304,961
42
17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
75,000
75,000
75,000
-
100
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
3,266,993
625,579
449,033
2,817,960
14
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
57,173
-
9,053
48,120
16
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,000,000
-
1,000,000
0
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
168,850
-
168,850
0
22 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
-
-
500
0
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
137,250
7,023
69,285
67,965
50
49,044,056
S 21,172,989
S 21,049,664
S 27,994,392
43
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009)
24 BENEFITS
$
206,650
$
83,875
$
94,966
$
111,684
46
25 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
138,543
51,424
201,566
20
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
180
5,793
1,207
83
27 MISCELLANEOUS
500
455
-
500
0
467,140
S
223,053
S
152,182
314,958
33
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUT FUND (0 14)
28 SUPPLIES
$
100
$
-
$
$
100
0
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
-
200
0
30 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
5,533
5,600
0
5,900
5,533
S
5,900
0
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
100,000
$
1,862
$
$
100,000
0
100,000
1,862
100,000
0
EDMO NDS O PIO ID RES PO NS E FUND (019)
32 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
$
21,555
$
100,000
$
-
$
21,555
0
21,555
100,000
s
21,555
0
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
45,000
$
-
$
-
$
45,000
0
34 REPAIR/MAINT
800
800
0
35 MISCELLANEOUS
-
25,966
(25,966)
0
45,800
25,966
19,834
57
6
Packet Pg. 93
6.4.a
Page 2 of 6
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Title
2020 Amended
Budget
6/30/2019
Expenditures
6/30/2020
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
STREETFUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
723,081
$
274,983
$
334,182
$ 388,899
46
2 OVERTIME
18,400
31,514
22,058
(3,658)
120
3 BENEFITS
309,539
129,336
161,035
148,504
52
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,278
3,781
2,219
63
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
136,340
97,720
165,280
37
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
1,008
684
19,316
3
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
27,930
6,101
1,246
26,684
4
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
3,161
4,237
263
94
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
10 RENTAL/LEASE
230,450
133,324
114,398
116,052
50
11 INSURANCE
145,219
156,514
156,937
(11,718)
108
12 UTILITIES
280,918
122,419
130,919
149,999
47
13 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
52,000
15,272
22,160
29,840
43
14 MISCELLANEOUS
13,000
1,662
2,841
10,159
22
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
100,000
-
75,658
24,342
76
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,170
-
-
4,170
0
17 INTEREST
510
289
255
255
50
$
2,199,717
$
1,015,201
$
1,128,111
$ 1,071,606
51
COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112)
18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
586,130
$
189,340
$
97,132
$ 488,998
17
19 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
163,028
6,405
170,234
(7,206)
104
20 MISCELLANEOUS
-
-
8
(8)
0
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
40,140
40,318
40,121
19
100
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,853,975
172,767
180,559
1,673,416
10
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
72,220
72,201
72,201
19
100
24 INTEREST
1,970
2,313
1,952
18
99
$
2,717,463
$
483,345
$
562,208
$ 2,155,255
21
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
25 SUPPLIES
$
4,700
$
521
$
102
$ 4,598
2
26 SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,700
-
(199)
1,899
-12
27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
228,500
9,284
10,995
217,506
5
28 TRAVEL
80
6
-
80
0
29 RENTAL/LEASE
2,000
-
2,000
0
30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
300
-
-
300
0
31 MISCELLANEOUS
6,600
2,691
1,461
5,139
22
$
243,880
$
12,502
$
12,359
$ 231,521
5
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (12 0)
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
92,487
$
33,938
$
26,848
$ 65,639
29
33 MISCELLANEOUS
6,763
583
500
6,263
7
34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
4,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
50
35 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
25,000
-
-
25,000
0
$
128,250
$
36,521
$
29,348
$ 98,902
23
EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
36 SUPPLIES
$
1,790
$
-
$
-
$ 1,790
0
37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25,090
25,090
0
$
26,880
$
-
$
-
$ 26,880
0
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
38 MISCELLANEOUS
$
3,000
$
1,752
$
450
$ 2,550
15
$
3,000
$
1,752
$
450
$ 2,550
15
TO URISM PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123)
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
33,900
$
5,915
$
2,223
$ 31,677
7
40 MISCELLANEOUS
-
1,744
-
-
0
$
33,900
$
7,659
$
2,223
$ 31,677
7
F
O
Q.
tY
C
M
C
IL
R
3
CJ
0
N
0
N
O
C
7
7
Packet Pg. 94
I 6.4.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 21,000 $
37,843 $
13,815
$ 7,185
66
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
479,831
100,082
153,982
325,849
32
3 RENTAL/LEASE
-
381
-
-
0
4 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
176,176
38,843
202,361
(26,185)
115
5 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
620
-
-
620
0
6 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
2,932,893
333,646
398,035
2,534,858
14
$ 3,610,520 $
510,795 $
768,193
$ 2,842,327
21
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS AC Q (126)
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
9 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10 LAND
11 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
12 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
13 INTEREST
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
14 SUPPLIES
15 SMALL EQUIPMENT
16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
18 MISCELLANEOUS
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
C EMEIERY MAINTENANC ETW RO VEMENT (130)
20 SALARIES AND WAGES
21 OVERTIME
22 BENEFIT S
23 UNIFORMS
24 SUPPLIES
25 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
26 SMALL EQUIPMENT
27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
28 COMMUNICATIONS
29 TRAVEL
30 RENTAL/LEASE
31 UTILITIES
32 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
33 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUSTFUND (136)
34 SMALL EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
35 SUPPLIES
36 TRAVEL
37 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140)
38 SUPPLIES
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
40 MISCELLANEOUS
LID FUND CONTROL (211)
41 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
42 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
43 INTEREST
$ 883,267 $
63,679 $
482,771
400,496
55
95,963
23,409
171,880
(75,917)
179
142,736
14,013
12,963
129,774
9
300,000
-
-
300,000
0
1,951,937
403,161
286,700
1,665,237
15
24,220
-
-
24,220
0
2,970
1,680
1,484
1,486
50
$ 3,401,093 $
505,942 $
955,798
$ 2,445,295
28
$ 48,882 $
24,301 $
20,780 $
28,102
43
-
574
-
-
0
6,500
-
6,500
0
22,000
1,858
-
22,000
0
600
-
168
432
28
35,800
13,150
17,900
17,900
50
$ 113,782 $
39,882 $
38,848 $
74,934
34
$ 97,476 $
45,255 $
40,909 $
56,567
42
3,500
2,816
176
3,324
5
42,029
20,855
18,274
23,755
43
1,000
225
-
1,000
0
7,000
697
405
6,595
6
20,000
8,771
8,306
11,694
42
-
1,246
-
-
0
4,200
866
-
4,200
0
1,700
929
840
860
49
500
-
-
500
0
8,230
3,130
4,115
4,115
50
5,652
1,815
2,146
3,506
38
500
-
-
500
0
4,000
8,777
2,325
1,675
58
$ 195,787 $
95,383 $
77,496 $
118,291
40
$ - $ 4,935 $ - $ - 0
$ $ 4,935 $ - $ 0
$ 1,500 $ 68 $ 11 $ 1,489 1
4,500 2,705 - 4,500 0
5,900 544 5,900 0
$ 11,900 $ 3,318 $ 11 $ 11,889 0
$ 11,850 $
4,760 $
9,439 $
2,411 80
66,035
28,331
24,169
41,866 37
2,625
950
90
2,535 3
80,510 S
34,040
33,697
46,813 42
$ 12,400 $ $ - $ 12,400 0
$ 12,400 $ $ $ 12,400 0
$ 643,810 $ - $ - $ 643,810 0
94,590 53,388 47,291 47,299 50
$ 738,400 $ 53,388 $ 47,291 $ 691,109 6
O
Q.
d
C
C
M
%
L
O
M
3
Cy
0
N
0
N
O
C
7
Packet Pg. 95
I 6.4.a I
Page 4 of 6
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 323,349
$ 12,915
$ 196,504
$ 126,845
61
2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
112,920
-
-
112,920
0
3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
12,577,074
16,627
460,676
12,116,398
4
$ 13,013,343
$ 29,543
$ 657,180
$ 12,356,163
5
WATER FUND (421)
4 SALARIES AND WAGES
5 OVERTIME
6 BENEFIT S
7 UNIFORMS
8 SUPPLIES
9 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
10 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
11 SMALL EQUIPMENT
12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13 COMMUNICATIONS
14 TRAVEL
15 EXCISE TAXES
16 RENTAL/LEASE
17INSURANCE
18 UTILITIES
19 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
20 MISCELLANEOUS
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
24 REVENUE BONDS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
STORM FUND (422)
27 SALARIES AND WAGES
28 OVERTIME
29 BENEFIT S
30 UNIFORMS
31 SUPPLIES
32 SMALL EQUIPMENT
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34 COMMUNICATIONS
35 TRAVEL
36 EXCISE TAXES
37 RENTAL/LEASE
38 INSURANCE
39 UTILITES
40 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
41 MISCELLANEOUS
42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
43 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
44 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
45 REVENUE BONDS
46 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
47 INTEREST
$ 845,871 $
390,865
$ 402,240
$ 443,631
48
24,000
11,987
9,575
14,425
40
363,882
181,401
161,964
201,918
45
4,000
2,029
2,343
1,657
59
150,000
32,658
51,533
98,467
34
2,170,000
770,160
817,594
1,352,406
38
170,000
32,277
89,435
80,565
53
11,000
4,856
4,940
6,060
45
1,753,804
424,355
611,538
1,142,266
35
30,000
12,628
14,942
15,058
50
200
-
-
200
0
1,649,700
728,049
626,900
1,022,800
38
133,158
76,514
65,271
67,887
49
52,865
55,096
52,541
324
99
35,775
14,170
14,686
21,089
41
75,830
15,511
19,039
56,791
25
131,400
62,471
74,573
56,827
57
650,870
206,313
204,067
446,803
31
3,946,207
1,452,719
1,523,822
2,422,385
39
2,800
-
-
2,800
0
370,960
-
-
370,960
0
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
100
211,190
113,174
105,907
105,283
50
$ 12,809,352 $
4,613,073
$ 4,878,748
$ 7,930,604
38
$ 728,080 $
344,031
$ 304,908
$ 423,172
42
6,000
27,971
7,892
(1,892)
132
334,154
178,099
143,019
191,135
43
6,500
4,872
5,369
1,131
83
46,000
17,193
14,419
31,581
31
4,000
3,653
684
3,316
17
3,047,970
560,718
865,877
2,182,093
28
3,200
2,347
3,230
(30)
101
4,300
-
-
4,300
0
470,100
256,430
249,247
220,853
53
270,830
122,014
136,841
133,989
51
118,263
127,548
116,576
1,687
99
11,025
5,698
6,061
4,964
55
116,183
10,053
13,181
103,002
11
158,100
82,141
84,291
73,809
53
282,550
80,083
78,897
203,653
28
4,758,296
145,156
1,915,305
2,842,991
40
102,030
-
-
102,030
0
181,210
-
-
181,210
0
60,760
32,063
53,576
7,184
88
122,400
61,964
60,769
61,631
50
$ 10,831,951 $
2,062,033
$ 4,060,143
$ 6,771,808
37
F
O
Q.
(Y
C
C
IL
M
3
CJ
0
N
0
N
O
C
9
Packet Pg. 96
I 6.4.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 1,953,719
$ 881,373
$ 973,322
$ 980,397
50
2 OVERTIME
95,000
48,806
49,928
45,072
53
3 BENEFITS
854,294
379,540
417,447
436,847
49
4 UNIFORMS
9,500
5,085
6,645
2,855
70
5 SUPPLIES
421,000
129,464
175,318
245,682
42
6 FUEL CONSUMED
60,000
16,382
10,335
49,665
17
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
0
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
8,005
20,089
14,911
57
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,286,406
579,843
1,314,151
972,255
57
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
18,492
21,087
21,913
49
11 TRAVEL
5,000
32
-
5,000
0
12 EXCISE TAXES
978,000
532,529
459,832
518,168
47
13 RENTAL/LEASE
311,966
181,606
167,514
144,452
54
14 INSURANCE
182,121
184,604
174,140
7,981
96
15 UTILITIES
1,540,685
609,856
420,944
1,119,741
27
16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
745,630
183,319
123,903
621,727
17
17 MISCELLANEOUS
127,650
48,500
48,123
79,527
38
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
7,197,114
339,196
445,070
6,752,044
6
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
-
76,610
(76,610)
0
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
15,438,495
291,951
576,192
14,862,303
4
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
154,660
-
-
154,660
0
22 REVENUE BONDS
82,840
-
-
82,840
0
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
173,210
157,991
158,325
14,885
91
24 INTEREST
68,270
37,239
33,421
34,849
49
25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
2 543
2 399
(2 399)
0
$ 32,767,560 $ 4,636,355 $ 5,674,797 $ 27,092,763 17
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
26 REVENUE BONDS $ 755,020 $ - $ - $ 755,020 0
27 INTEREST 1,233,110 625,592 616,542 616,568 50
$ 1,988,130 $ 625,592 $ 616,542 $ 1,371,588 31
F
O
Q.
C
C
IL
M
3
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
10
Packet Pg. 97
6.4.a
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF EDMO
NDS
EXPENDITURES
BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQ UIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
266,952
$
130,303
$ 137,363
$
129,589
51
2 OVERTIME
2,000
8,081
824
1,176
41
3 BENEFITS
112,598
56,904
57,102
55,496
51
4 UNIFORMS
1,000
1,060
797
203
80
5 SUPPLIES
130,000
61,065
38,053
91,947
29
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
243,000
71,135
73,955
169,045
30
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
1,689
279
57,721
0
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
701
1,750
45,000
4
C
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
1,098
1,182
1,818
39
C
Q.
11 TRAVEL
1,000
255
-
1,000
0
d
12 RENTAL/LEASE
12,750
6,862
6,115
6,635
48
w
13 INSURANCE
27,848
30,167
40,270
(12,422)
145
14 UTILITIES
14,500
7,920
8,231
6,269
57
v
C
15 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
60,000
10,471
24,237
35,763
40
=
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
7,902
7,225
4,775
60
IL
17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
1,500,000
-
-
1,500,000
0
18 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
678,000
456,103
41,970
636,030
6
$
3,170,398
$
851,714
$ 439,356
$
2,731,042
14
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
M
19 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
369,264
$
141,592
$ 139,912
$
229,352
38
CY
20 OVERTIME
2,000
60
-
2,000
0
O
21 BENEFITS
124,590
48,438
47,519
77,071
38
Np
22 SUPPLIES
5,000
1,738
1,443
3,557
29
N
23 SMALL EQUIPMENT
137,700
28,851
38,941
98,759
28
24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
309,810
6,551
47,998
261,812
15
25 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
31,450
35,795
22,975
26 TRAVEL
1,500
353
207
1,293
14
27 RENTAL/LEASE
7,490
2,419
2,245
5,245
30
d
28 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
367,660
148,442
216,004
151,656
59
29 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
1,124
10,264
(5,264)
205
30 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
66,000
57,571
-
66,000
0
$
1,454,784
$
468,592
$ 540,328
$
914,456
37
ea
FIRIMEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
31 BENEFITS
$
23,000
$
9,933
$ 12,834
$
10,166
56
LL
32 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
54,500
87,615
31,215
23,285
57
>'
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,200
-
1,007
193
84
N
$
78,700
$
97,548
$ 45,056
$
33,644
57
cc
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
139,316,151
$
37,692,549
$ 41,795,994
$
97,520,157
30
(:J
11
Packet Pg. 98
6.4.a
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDPTURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2020 Amended 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY CLERK
FINANCE
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PARKS& RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
% Spent
$ 418,912 $
206,635 $
160,080 $
258,832
38%
306,685
146,522
169,276
137,409
55%
740,691
289,770
335,262
405,429
45%
1,138,771
481,931
507,527
631,244
45%
726,962
343,911
378,904
348,058
52%
p
CL
1,289,583
612,381
795,796
493,787
62%
4'
912,540
415,167
431,895
480,645
47%
c�
15,322,110
6,729,909
6,488,886
8,833,224
42%
C
11,951,730
5,802,457
5,628,905
6,322,825
47%
IL
a
761,493
270,544
258,279
503,214
34%
3,582,847
1,357,577
1,370,746
2,212,101
38%
M
4,594,969
1,882,379
1,756,039
2,838,930
38%
3
Cy
0
3,538,610
1,547,622
1,592,543
1,946,067
45%
p
N
3,758,153
1,086,185
1,175,527
2,582,626
31%
C
$ 49,044,056 $
21,172,989 $
21,049,664 $
27,994,392
43%
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
Title
2020 Amended
Budget
6/30/2019
Expenditures
6/30/2020
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
WATER UTILITY FUND
$ 12,809,352
$ 4,613,073
$ 4,878,748
$ 7,930,604
38%
STORM UTILITY FUND
10,831,951
2,062,033
4,060,143
6,771,808
37%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
32,767,560
4,636,355
5,674,797
27,092,763
17%
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,130
625,592
616,542
1,371,588
31%
$ 58,396,993
$ 11,937,053
$ 15,230,229
$ 43,166,764
26%
12
Packet Pg. 99
Page 1 of 4
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2020 Amended
Budget
6/30/2019
Expenditures
6/30/2020
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES
$
191,224
$
88,782
$
94,397
$
96,827
49%
OVERTIME
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
BENEFITS
95,736
48,514
49,012
46,724
51%
SUPPLIES
2,500
760
1,484
1,016
59%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
342
-
1,000
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
62,160
52,576
3,377
58,783
5%
COMMUNICATIONS
5,000
2,764
4,372
628
87%
TRAVEL
17,500
1,918
587
16,913
3%
RENTAL/LEASE
12,292
6,096
6,160
6,133
50%
REPAIRS✓MAINTENANCE
500
121
645
(145)
129%
MISCELLANEOUS
30,000
4,762
48
29,952
0%
$
418,912
$
206,635
$
160,080
$
258,832
38%
OFFICEOFMAYOR
SALARIES
$
222,432
$
107,883
$
112,214
S
110,218
50%
BENEFITS
54,043
26,742
43,096
10,947
80%
SUPPLIES
1,500
367
539
961
36%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
-
4,199
(4,199)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,000
1,600
420
2,580
14%
COMMUNICATION
1,400
491
614
786
44%
TRAVEL
3,000
1,964
153
2,847
5%
RENTAL/LEASE
16,860
6,278
7,929
8,931
47%
MISCELLANEOUS
4,450
1,197
113
4,337
3%
$
306,685
$
146,522
$
169,276
$
137,409
55%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES
$
356,658
$
176,956
$
184,123
$
172,535
52%
OVERTIME
-
118
1,012
(1,012)
0%
BENEFITS
142,458
50,064
72,443
70,015
51%
SUPPLIES
18,556
2,136
3,334
15,222
18%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
300
-
893
(593)
298%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
136,471
30,023
28,951
107,520
21%
COMMUNICATIONS
1,550
507
737
813
48%
TRAVEL
1,000
309
500
500
50%
RENTAL/LEASE
31,921
12,399
15,318
16,603
48%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
8,380
7,571
7,832
548
93%
MISCELLANEOUS
43,397
9,686
20,120
23,277
46%
$
740,691
$
289,770
$
335,262
$
405,429
45%
MUNIC IPAL C O URT
SALARIES
$
647,030
$
291,352
$
315,034
$
331,996
49%
OVERTIME
800
367
70
730
9%
BENEFITS
223,319
98,805
117,462
105,857
53%
SUPPLIES
10,600
1,471
2,545
8,055
24%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
5,155
-
1,000
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124,925
36,792
27,342
97,583
22%
COMMUNICATIONS
3,550
1,195
1,100
2,450
31%
TRAVEL
6,500
1,432
37
6,463
1%
RENTAL/LEASE
67,947
32,027
34,323
33,624
51%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
4,880
277
645
4,235
13%
MISCELLANEOUS
25,100
13,057
8,970
16,130
36%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
23,120
0%
$
1,138,771
$
481,931
$
507,527
$
631,244
45%
13
Packet Pg. 100 1
I 6.4.a I
Page 2 of 4
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 376,214
$ 175,343
$ 204,825
$ 171,389
54%
BENEFITS
156,718
77,214
82,450
74,268
53%
SUPPLIES
10,240
1,106
2,412
7,828
24%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
-
1,003
(1,003)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
37,410
10,931
12,548
24,862
34%
COMMUNICATIONS
40,000
15,824
4,100
35,900
10%
TRAVEL
2,000
465
6
1,994
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
63,850
24,414
26,396
37,454
41%
REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
32,530
33,184
41,791
(9,261)
128%
MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
5,430
3,372
4,628
42%
$ 726,962
$ 343,911
$ 378,904
$ 348,058
52%
FINANCE
SALARIES
$
870,882
$
400,451
$
571,613
$
299,269
66%
OVERTIME
4,500
-
-
4,500
0%
BENEFITS
289,923
135,482
145,316
144,607
50%
SUPPLIES
7,350
2,912
2,371
4,979
32%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,650
579
-
2,650
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,300
349
56
9,244
1%
COMMUNICATIONS
2,000
557
422
1,578
21%
TRAVEL
3,100
2,055
-
3,100
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
50,048
24,727
29,485
20,563
59%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
41,480
42,499
43,963
(2,483)
106%
MISCELLANEOUS
8,350
2,770
2,571
5,779
31%
$
1,289,583
$
612,381
$
795,796
$
493,787
62%
CITY ATPO RNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
912,540
$
415,167
$
431,895
$
480,645
47%
$
912,540
$
415,167
$
431,895
$
480,645
47%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT
50,000
22,812
335
49,665
1%
SUPPLIES
5,000
2,371
3,818
1,182
76%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,009,120
5,503,208
5,402,245
5,606,875
49%
EXCISE TAXES
6,500
1,481
5,244
1,256
81%
RENTAL/LEASE
15,249
6,393
8,048
7,201
53%
INSURANCE
394,124
436,448
393,746
378
100%
MISCELLANEOUS
91,774
49,596
82,133
9,641
89%
CONTRIBUTION TO ECA
75,000
75,000
75,000
-
100%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
3,266,993
625,579
449,033
2,817,960
14%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
168,850
-
-
168,850
0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT
137,250
7,023
69,285
67,965
50%
FISCAL AGENT FEES
500
-
-
500
0%
$
15,322,110
$
6,729,909
$
6,488,886
$
8,833,224
42%
F
O
CL
O
R
U
C
M
C
M
a
L
M
7
CJ
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
14
Packet Pg. 101
I 6.4.a I
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PO LIC E S ERVIC ES
SALARIES
$ 6,968,887
$ 3,295,695
$ 3,363,209
$ 3,605,678
48%
OVERTIME
461,280
387,284
250,881
210,399
54%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK
262,020
7,053
1,450
260,570
1%
BENEFITS
2,769,042
1,309,612
1,340,247
1,428,795
48%
UNIFORMS
80,750
47,774
42,547
38,203
53%
SUPPLIES
90,500
61,406
54,286
36,214
60%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
127,739
82,267
42,668
85,071
33%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
224,548
81,328
85,088
139,460
38%
COMMUNICATIONS
36,000
18,782
21,541
14,459
60%
TRAVEL
29,310
20,206
2,393
26,917
8%
RENTAL/LEASE
826,124
458,318
409,476
416,648
50%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
15,180
3,828
2,123
13,058
14%
MISCELLANEOUS
60,350
28,905
12,995
47,355
22%
$ 11,951,730
$ 5,802,457
$ 5,628,905
$ 6,322,825
47%
C O MMUNITY S ERVIC ES /EC O N DEV.
SALARIES
$
357,423
$
125,715
$
153,842
$
203,581
43%
BENEFITS
114,637
39,392
45,035
69,602
39%
SUPPLIES
7,475
5,886
6,706
769
90%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
4,173
-
3,321
852
80%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
214,400
89,416
37,935
176,465
18%
COMMUNICATIONS
2,975
655
918
2,057
31%
TRAVEL
2,000
-
1,020
980
51%
RENTAL/LEASE
13,410
5,715
5,900
7,510
44%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
10,500
-
-
10,500
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
9,500
3,763
3,603
5,897
38%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
25,000
25,000
0%
$
761,493
$
270,544
$
258,279
$
503,214
34%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES
$
1,760,943
$
782,900
$
857,244
$
903,699
49%
OVERTIME
1,300
5,457
12,231
(10,931)
941%
BENEFITS
658,292
302,131
312,785
345,507
48%
UNIFORMS
500
-
-
500
0%
SUPPLIES
17,100
5,039
4,601
12,499
27%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
7,300
624
1,374
5,926
19%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
886,518
158,197
70,230
816,288
8%
COMMUNICATIONS
9,000
3,888
5,426
3,574
60%
TRAVEL
6,800
7,834
228
6,572
3%
RENTAL/LEASE
170,234
71,397
85,133
85,101
50%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
6,800
596
-
6,800
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
58,060
19,513
21,493
36,567
37%
$
3,582,847
$
1,357,577
$
1,370,746
$
2,212,101
38%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES
$
1,772,804
$
836,096
$
870,683
$
902,121
49%
OVERTIME
5,000
2,550
2,081
2,919
42%
BENEFITS
701,327
347,879
351,025
350,302
50%
UNIFORMS
450
-
-
450
0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,200
-
868
1,332
39%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
188,840
1,104
1,530
187,310
1%
COMMUNICATIONS
19,600
6,850
8,285
11,315
42%
TRAVEL
600
585
92
508
15%
RENTAL/LEASE
134,995
60,838
66,051
68,944
49%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
2,600
-
458
2,142
18%
MISCELLANEOUS
80,000
43,770
34,538
45,462
43%
$
2,908,416
$
1,299,672
$
1,335,611
$
1,572,805
46%
F
O
CL
O
R
U
C
to
C
IL
%
L
M
3
CJ
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
15
Packet Pg. 102
I 6.4.a I
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
% Spent
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES
$ 2,272,394
$ 982,976
$ 946,122
$ 1,326,272
42%
OVERTIME
10,000
12,158
2,006
7,994
20%
BENEFITS
864,290
380,954
360,897
503,393
42%
UNIFORMS
6,275
4,468
2,406
3,869
38%
SUPPLIES
137,390
68,975
82,784
54,606
60%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
10,900
2,639
2,190
8,710
20%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
620,765
130,205
87,652
533,113
14%
COMMUNICATIONS
31,370
3,971
12,342
19,028
39%
TRAVEL
5,270
3,410
50
5,220
1%
RENTAL/LEASE
268,945
145,638
133,929
135,016
50%
PUBLIC UTILITY
230,507
80,714
70,436
160,071
31%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
29,700
17,525
16,593
13,107
56%
MISCELLANEOUS
98,110
48,747
29,579
68,531
30%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
9,053
9,053
0
100%
$ 4,594,969
$ 1,882,379
$ 1,756,039
$ 2,838,930
38%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SMALL EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
TRAVEL
RENT AL/LEASE
PUBLIC UTILITY
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
MISCELLANEOUS
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
UNIFORMS
SUPPLIES
SMALL EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
TRAVEL
RENT AL/LEASE
PUBLIC UTILITY
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
MISCELLANEOUS
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$ 380,790 $
143,484 $
150,156 $
230,634
39%
200
144
-
200
0%
131,041
51,511
53,137
77,904
41%
8,600
3,203
2,579
6,021
30%
1,000
857
264
736
26%
200
42
92
108
46%
1,350
341
397
953
29%
500
1,383
-
500
0%
97,295
44,985
48,018
49,277
49%
3,318
1,500
1,595
1,723
48%
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
4,900
500
693
4,207
14%
$ 630,194 $
247,950 $
256,932 $
373,262
41%
787,257
381,720
393,251
394,006
50%
7,500
4,862
2,922
4,578
39%
348,852
169,707
169,027
179,825
48%
3,000
3,823
13,177
(10,177)
439%
112,000
91,048
71,917
40,083
64%
3,000
2,658
818
2,182
27%
977,444
62,447
101,114
876,330
10%
16,000
9,868
11,811
4,189
74%
1,000
6
-
1,000
0%
55,940
27,365
25,470
30,470
46%
297,700
153,253
159,205
138,495
53%
143,460
176,723
225,013
(81,553)
157%
5,000
2,706
1,802
3,198
36%
1,000,000
-
-
1,000,000
0%
$ 3,758,153 $
1,086,185 $
1,175,527 $
2,582,626
31%
$ 49,044,056 $ 21,172,989 $ 21,049,664 $ 27,994,392 43%
F
O
CL
O
R
U
C
M
C
IL
a
L
M
7
CJ
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
16
Packet Pg. 103
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2020
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 2,268,581 $
2,268,581
$ 2,376,947
4.78%
February
4,691,156
2,422,575
4,730,574
0.84%
March
7,266,925
2,575,769
7,100,593
-2.29%
April
10,693,016
3,426,091
9,435,773
-11.76%
May
19,106,833
8,413,817
17,528,670
-8.26%
June
21,647,958
2,541,125
19,628,003
-9.33%
July
23,877,416
2,229,458
August
26,676,562
2,799,147
September
28,994,637
2,318,075
October
32,807,785
3,813,148
November
41,358,293
8,550,508
December
43,803,858
2,445,565
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2020
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
193,769 $
193,769
$ 323,203
66.80%
February
345,606
151,837
496,485
43.66%
March
547,140
201,534
685,999
25.38%
April
740,550
193,410
857,110
15.74%
May
973,673
233,123
998,087
2.51%
June
1,219,609
245,935
1,240,599
1.72%
July
1,532,815
313,206
August
1,804,669
271,854
September
2,081,138
276,470
October
2,301,037
219,898
November
2,520,239
219,202
December
2,700,000
179,761
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
IZ
R
U
C
M
C_
LL
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
7
17
Packet Pg. 104
I 6.4.a I
SALES TAX SUMMARY
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: June 2020
Year -to -Date
Total $3,761,924
Automotive Repair,
Health & Personal Care, $93,985
$126,512 Amusement &
Construction Trade, Recreation, $33,284
Accommodation, $579,074 Business Services,
$15,169 $385,109
Clothing and Gasoline, $16,305
Accessories,$119,449 Retail Food Stores,
Communications, $160,747
$117,309
Wholesale Trade,
$142,245
Misc Retail, $685,717
Others, $57,047
L Retail Automotive,
$778,316
77Manufacturing, $43,504
Eating & Drinking,
$408,151
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
10,000,000
8,000,000
7 395 114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715
$5,840,764 $6,741,838 $6,905,122
6,000,000
4,000,000 11 3 761 924
2,000, 000
0
201 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 2020
18
Packet Pg. 105
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2020
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 634,902 $
634,902
$ 692,248
9.03%
February
1,436,667
801,765
1,539,597
7.16%
March
2,031,860
595,193
2,187,876
7.68%
April
2,597,573
565,713
2,691,601
3.62%
May
3,324,621
727,048
3,191,797
-4.00%
June
3,990,697
666,076
3,761,924
-5.73%
July
4,697,452
706,756
August
5,482,731
785,279
September
6,213,489
730,757
October
6,961,050
747,562
November
7,750,015
788,965
December
8,450,000
699,985
Gas Utility Tax
Sales and Use Tax
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000 /
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 81,408 $
81,408
$ 82,496
1.34%
February
168,408
87,000
177,747
5.55%
March
245,012
76,604
260,308
6.24%
April
308,737
63,725
337,848
9.43%
May
358,094
49,357
395,193
10.36%
June
392,813
34,720
430,775
9.66%
July
419,421
26,607
August
441,879
22,458
September
462,623
20,744
October
486,497
23,874
November
524,782
38,285
December
579,600
54,818
Gas Utility Tax
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
19
Packet Pg. 106
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2020
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 79,271 $
79,271
$ 70,129
-11.53%
February
154,920
75,649
134,128
-13.42%
March
224,811
69,891
191,257
-14.93%
April
298,919
74,108
254,236
-14.95%
May
365,795
66,876
309,632
-15.35%
June
433,375
67,580
361,422
-16.60%
July
497,866
64,491
August
563,527
65,661
September
631,163
67,636
October
697,753
66,590
November
761,530
63,777
December
823,900
62,370
Electric Utility Tax
1,000,000
Telephone Utility Tax
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000 ir
0
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 176,332 $
176,332
$ 179,486
1.79%
February
369,755
193,422
371,370
0.44%
March
530,960
161,206
535,467
0.85%
April
710,778
179,818
710,200
-0.08%
May
852,710
141,933
854,417
0.20%
June
974,520
121,810
970,402
-0.42%
July
1,088,754
114,233
August
1,199,457
110,703
September
1,311,314
111,857
October
1,428,233
116,919
November
1,552,157
123,924
December
1,684,800
132,643
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
O
R
C
C
M
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
20
Packet Pg. 107
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2020
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
804,719 $
804,719
$ 737,298
-8.38%
February
1,363,439
558,720
1,256,012
-7.88 /
March
2,170,455
807,015
2,048,593
-5.61%
April
2,696,703
526,248
2,538,466
-5.87/,
May
3,481,516
784,813
3,275,201
-5.93/,
June
4,099,586
618,070
3,855,044
-5.97%
July
5,087,366
987,780
August
5,941,343
853,977
September
7,092,152
1,150,809
October
7,892,798
800,646
November
8,818,044
925,246
December
9,384,958
566,914
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2020
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
355,919 $
355,919
$ 348,012
1.79%
February
1,125,592
769,673
1,101,727
0.44%
March
1,480,771
355,179
1,449,754
0.85%
April
1,795,425
314,654
1,758,968
-0.08%
May
2,150,929
355,505
2,107,634
0.20%
June
2,466,536
315,606
2,417,745
-0.42%
July
2,822,237
355,701
August
3,592,736
770,499
September
3,947,537
354,801
October
4,262,734
315,197
November
4,618,388
355,654
December
4,921,433
303,045
Storm Water Sales
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--6-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
R
U
C
M
C_
M
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
ZZ
Packet Pg. 108
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2020
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 843,972 $
843,972
$ 792,168
-6.14%
February
1,528,418
684,445
1,457,427
-4.64%
March
2,368,523
840,105
2,253,756
-4.85%
April
3,057,434
688,911
2,905,227
-4.98%
May
3,904,796
847,362
3,666,165
-6.11%
June
4,601,743
696,947
4,301,071
-6.53%
July
5,475,901
874,158
August
6,170,772
694,871
September
7,057,714
886,942
October
7,759,947
702,233
November
8,620,364
860,417
December
9,307,969
687,605
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
22
Packet Pg. 109
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2020
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
5,642,749 $
5,642,749
$ 3,641,481
-35.47%
February
8,910,266
3,267,517
7,564,087
-1S.11%
March
12,507,763
3,597,497
10,796,906
-13.68%
April
16,723,319
4,215,556
13,318,642
-20.36%
May
19,875,327
3,152,008
17,123,820
-13.84%
June
24,725,220
4,849,893
21,049,664
-14.87%
July
28,663,754
3,938,534
August
32,968,461
4,304,707
September
36,464,588
3,496,127
October
40,092,243
3,627,655
November
44,563,572
4,471,329
December
49,044,056
4,480,484
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2020
Non -Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
2,923,229 $
2,923,229
$ 1,280,852
-56.18%
February
3,405,897
482,668
2,717,261
-20.22%
March
4,567,146
1,161,249
3,569,389
-21.85%
April
6,398,890
1,831,744
3,731,670
-41.68%
May
6,709,824
310,934
5,129,301
-23.56%
June
8,510,257
1,800,433
6,488,886
-23.75%
July
9,528,179
1,017,922
August
10,974,933
1,446,754
September
11,879,864
904,931
October
12,546,369
666,505
November
14,100,020
1,553,651
December
15,322,110
1,222,090
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
R
U
C
M
C_
M
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
23
Packet Pg. 110
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2020
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
26,361 $
26,361 $
23,825
-9.62%
February
54,130
27,769
55,625
2.76%
March
88,475
34,345
81,971
-7.35%
April
119,273
30,799
106,847
-10.42%
May
158,791
39,518
133,074
-16.20%
June
205,911
47,121
160,080
-22.26%
July
239,007
33,095
August
285,476
46,469
September
323,555
38,079
October
346,924
23,369
November
382,373
35,449
December
418,912
36,539
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2020
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
25,001 $
25,001 $
28,750
15.00%
February
50,898
25,897
60,151
18.18%
March
76,062
25,164
87,486
15.02%
April
101,769
25,706
114,642
12.65%
May
126,945
25,177
142,030
11.88%
June
151,749
24,804
169,276
11.55%
July
177,563
25,814
August
203,939
26,376
September
229,480
25,541
October
254,419
24,939
November
279,429
25,010
December
306,685
27,256
Office of Mayor
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget - -Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
i?
tC
U
C
M
C_
LL
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
7
24
Packet Pg. 111
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2020
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 59,451 $
59,451
$ 68,346
14.96%
February
117,267
57,816
134,278
14.51%
March
178,196
60,929
184,385
3.47%
April
229,767
51,571
233,118
1.46%
May
284,932
55,165
283,462
-0.52%
June
355,895
70,963
335,262
-5.80%
July
411,216
55,322
August
469,554
58,338
September
531,309
61,755
October
590,790
59,481
November
649,771
58,981
December
740,691
90,920
Municipal Court
Human Resources
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 86,636 $
86,636
$ 79,231
-8.55%
February
180,238
93,602
166,073
-7.86%
March
272,302
92,065
249,701
-8.30%
April
365,299
92,996
331,047
-9.38%
May
465,516
100,217
422,932
-9.15%
June
553,704
88,188
507,527
-8.34%
July
646,093
92,389
August
743,853
97,760
September
834,912
91,059
October
934,920
100,009
November
1,028,111
93,191
December
1,138,771
110,660
Municipal Court
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0---CurrentYeaz Budget �PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
tC
U
C
M
C
LL
%
L
M
7
0
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
25
Packet Pg. 112
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2020
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
49,169 $
49,169 $
40,001
-18.65%
February
106,160
56,991
82,357
-22.42%
March
165,380
59,220
123,069
-25.58%
April
227,893
62,513
165,175
-27.52%
May
286,048
58,155
210,066
-26.56%
June
342,978
56,930
258,279
-24.70%
July
404,684
61,706
August
472,943
68,259
September
532,197
59,254
October
597,110
64,914
November
667,285
70,174
December
761,493
94,208
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk
2020
City Clerk
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 71,401 $
71,401
$ 83,447
16.87%
February
129,624
58,223
139,339
7.49%
March
187,005
57,380
199,113
6.47%
April
251,043
64,039
258,617
3.02%
May
306,774
55,730
321,093
4.67%
June
361,810
55,036
378,904
4.72%
July
423,597
61,787
August
486,276
62,679
September
539,284
53,008
October
597,946
58,662
November
662,981
65,035
December
726,962
63,981
City Clerk
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
R
U
C
M
C_
LL
%
L
M
7
0
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
7
26
Packet Pg. 113
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2020
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
177,914 $
177,914 $
81,888
-53.97%
February
334,463
156,549
291,582
-12.82%
March
444,630
110,167
352,886
-20.63%
April
528,740
84,111
396,588
-24.99%
May
626,604
97,864
462,422
-26.20%
June
728,444
101,840
540,328
-25.82%
July
813,042
84,598
August
911,499
98,456
September
1,028,310
116,812
October
1,126,888
98,577
November
1,231,196
104,309
December
1,454,784
223,588
Finance
Technology Rental Fund
1,500,000
1,200,000
900,000
600,000
300,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance
2020
Cumulative
Monthly
YTD
Variance
Budget Forecast
Budget Forecast
Actuals
%
January
$ 124,756
$ 124,756
$ 148,549
19.07%
February
235,691
110,935
251,089
6.53%
March
337,197
101,506
353,610
4.87%
April
438,143
100,947
456,877
4.28%
May
539,685
101,542
562,662
4.26%
June
639,437
99,752
795,796
24.45%
July
7S0,562
111,125
August
854,084
103,522
September
970,025
115,941
October
1,081,072
111,048
November
1,184,488
103,415
December
1,289,583
105,095
Finance
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
t4
U
C
M
C_
M
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
27
Packet Pg. 114
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2020
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 76,045 $
76,045
$ 49,883
-34.40%
February
1S2,090
76,045
142,611
-6.23%
March
228,135
76,045
192,534
-1S.61%
April
304,180
76,045
288,462
-5.17%
May
380,225
76,045
359,660
-5.41%
June
456,270
76,045
431,895
-5.34%
July
532,315
76,045
August
608,360
76,045
September
684,405
76,045
October
760,450
76,045
November
836,495
76,045
December
912,540
76,045
Police
City Attorney
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 940,461 $
940,461
$ 887,236
-5.66%
February
1,891,364
950,903
1,893,712
0.12%
March
2,844,400
953,036
2,821,483
-0.81%
April
3,808,566
964,166
3,703,720
-2.75%
May
4,764,870
956,304
4,601,807
-3.42%
June
5,757,552
992,683
5,628,905
-2.23%
July
6,727,081
969,529
August
7,664,129
937,048
September
8,620,478
956,349
October
9,688,901
1,068,423
November
10,939,777
1,250,876
December
11,951,730
1,011,953
Police
12,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--ft- Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
Z$
Packet Pg. 115
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2020
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 249,933 $
249,933
$ 241,446
-3.40%
February
530,487
280,S53
461,847
-12.94%
March
820,192
289,705
685,780
-16.39%
April
1,114,858
294,666
922,412
-17.26%
May
1,418,144
303,286
1,151,071
-18.83%
June
1,697,166
279,021
1,370,746
-19.23%
July
1,991,793
294,627
August
2,295,145
303,352
September
2,593,333
298,188
October
2,899,612
306,279
November
3,239,495
339,883
December
3,582,847
343,352
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*-- Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 310,663 $
310,663
$ 278,296
-10.42%
February
633,218
322,555
596,263
-5.84%
March
976,069
342,851
892,745
-8.54%
April
1,332,232
356,164
1,186,533
-10.94%
May
1,699,847
367,615
1,472,976
-13.35%
June
2,069,338
369,491
1,756,039
-15.14%
July
2,534,539
465,201
August
3,070,105
535,567
September
3,504,600
434,495
October
3,876,641
372,041
November
4,200,535
323,894
December
4,594,969
394,434
Parks & Recreation
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
tC
U
C
M
C_
M
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
29
Packet Pg. 116
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2020
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 51,939 $
51,939
$ 41,796
-19.53%
February
105,536
53,597
83,385
-20.99%
March
157,916
52,379
125,953
-20.24%
April
210,278
52,362
169,511
-19.39%
May
262,800
52,522
212,944
-18.97%
June
316,459
53,659
256,932
-18.81%
July
370,954
54,495
August
422,825
51,871
September
472,902
50,077
October
524,167
51,265
November
575,881
51,714
December
630,194
54,313
Facilities Maintenance
Public Works Administration
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2020
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
284,728 $
284,728
$ 177,532
-37.65%
February
585,426
300,698
353,835
-39.56%
March
887,362
301,936
583,052
-34.29%
April
1,181,106
293,744
781,557
-33.83%
May
1,483,561
302,454
1,002,638
-32.42%
June
1,740,520
256,959
1,175,527
-32.46%
July
2,069,330
328,810
August
2,371,409
302,079
September
2,707,430
336,020
October
3,011,628
304,199
November
3,381,203
369,574
December
3,758,153
376,950
Facilities Maintenance
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
CL
R
U
C
M
C_
LL
%
L
M
7
Cy
O
N
O
N
O
C
7
30
Packet Pg. 117
I 6.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2020
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 219,750 $
219,750
$ 212,290
-3.39%
February
436,542
216,792
426,262
-2.35%
March
671,678
235,136
646,635
-3.73%
April
915,104
243,427
868,452
-5.10%
May
1,155,255
240,151
1,118,106
-3.22%
June
1,402,970
247,715
1,335,611
-4.80%
July
1,656,398
253,428
August
1,917,510
261,112
September
2,156,951
239,441
October
2,402,446
245,495
November
2,635,839
233,393
December
2,908,416
272,577
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
31
Packet Pg. 118
I 6.4.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
As of June 30, 2020
Years
Agency/
Investment
Purchase
to
Par
Market
Maturity
Coupon
Issuer
Type
Rice
Maturity
Value
Value
Date
Rate
RFCS
Bonds
1,999,698
0.04
2,120,000
2,119,816
07/15/20
1.60%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
4,014,120
0.51
4,000,000
4,018,960
01/01/21
1.47%
First Financial
CD
3,000,000
0.78
3,000,000
3,000,000
04/10/21
2.86%
Port of Seattle WA
Bonds
273,305
0.84
270,000
270,778
05/01/21
2.23%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
410,553
1.51
405,000
412,829
01/01/22
1.79%
FFCB
Bonds
1,998,548
1.96
2,000,000
2,062,848
06/14/22
1.88%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
1,466,077
2.00
1,345,000
261,430
07/01/22
5.00%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
260,748
2.00
250,000
1,469,829
07/01/22
2.95%
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Bonds
948,084
2.42
855,000
952,393
12/01/22
5.00%
FHLB
Bonds
3,000,000
2.50
3,000,000
3,020,028
12/30/22
1.79%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
1,517,955
2.51
1,500,000
1,536,720
01/01/23
1.54%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
576,332
2.51
520,000
579,836
01/01/23
5.00%
Seattle WA Muni
Bonds
2,224,500
2.59
2,000,000
2,240,900
02/01/23
5.00%
First Financial
CD
2,803,516
3.38
2,803,516
2,803,516
11/15/23
2.10%
Kent WA
Bonds
286,648
3.42
250,000
289,203
12/01/23
5.00%
Spokane County WA
Bonds
259,075
4.42
250,000
263,733
12/01/24
2.10%
First Financial
CD
2,000,000
7.34
2,000,000
2,000,000
11/01/27
1.68%
TOTAL SECURITIES
27,039,157
2.40
26,568,516
27,302,818
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
25,033,286
25,033,286
Demand
0.37%
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool
10,058,556
10,058,556
Demand
1.87%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
$
61,660,358 $
62,394,659
Energy Issuer Diversification
Northwest,
6%
FHLB, 11% First
Financial -
Spokane CD, 29%
County
WA, 1% RFCS, 8%
Cash and Investment Balances Checking,
(in $ Millions) _ $1.0 , 2%
Bonds,
$18.8, 30%
State LGIP,
$25.0, 40%
CD's, $7.8,
12% County _.
LGIP,
32
Packet Pg. 119 1
6.4a
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000 917 754
$800,000 $653,690
$600,000
$00,000 335 926 $423,816 $448,124
$200,000
$---Am
1
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 2020
L
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000, 000
Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months)
6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark) City Blended Rate
••------- - - - - - -
September November
--- - - - - - -
January March May
Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48-54 54-60 60-66 66-72 72-78 78-84 84-90 90-96
Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo
33
I Packet Pg. 120
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
I 6.4.a I
GENERAL FUND
& SUBFUNDS
001-General Fund
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
016-Building Maintenance
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
018 -Edmonds Homelessness Response
019 - Edmonds Opioid Response
Total General Fund & Subfunds
FUND BALANCES
Iy:/_1►lei a1►1111►19] 1_1WG161[a]
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019
3/31 /2020
6/30/2020
$ 15,552,187
$ 11,855,874
$ 14,130,526
$
355,874
266,504
416,192
1,782,149
1,782,149
1,782,149
12,187
12,187
14,687
210,221
210,221
210,221
864,491
864,491
864,491
223,581
223,581
223,581
50,000
50,000
50,000
$ 19,050,690
$ 15,265,008
$ 17,691,847
$
---- ACTUAL ---- _
Q2 YTD 0
o
Q.
2,274,651 $ (1,421,66,
149,688 60,311
(0) -
2,500 2,501
LL
_ _ 21
L
0 -
(0) -
0
N
0
2,426,839 $ (1,358,84, a1)
*$2,000,000 of the General Fund Balance has been assigned by management for the development of Civic Field.
General Fund & Subfunds
21
18
15 ■ General Fund
12 & Subfunds
0 9 $17.05 $15.69 ■ Civic Field
$13.27
6
3 I
$2.00 $2.00 L c
Dec 2019 Mar 2020 June 2020
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
34
Packet Pg. 121 1
6.4.a
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
FUNDS
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 3/31 /2020 6/30/2020
Q2 YTD
General Fund & Subfunds
$ 19,050,690 $ 15,265,008 $ 17,691,847
$ 2,426,839 $ (1,358,84:
Special Revenue
10,622,237 11,614,731 10,896,734
(717,997) 274,497
0
Debt Service
- - (0)
(0) (C
Capital Projects
6,443,150 6,660,453 6,362,622
(297,831) (80,52f
U
Total Governmental Funds
$ 36,116,078 $ 33,540,192 $ 34,951,202
$ 1,411,010 $ (1,164,87E
c
ii
21
L
L
CY
Q
N
O
Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund Group Governmental Fund Balances -
Combined
O
21 40
a-
$19.05 $36.12 $34.95
D
18 17.69 35
,General
Fund &
30
15 Subfunds
ii
--a—Special 25
21
0 12 Revenue c
1111111— 0.62 $10.90 !� 20
9 Debt
CY
Service 15 —
6 $6.36
--*--Capital 10
Projects
Q
E
3 5 —
O
U
_ �
r
c
Dec 2019 Mar20 0 June 2020 Dec 2019 Mar2020 June 2020
j_
t
v
cv
r
r
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
35
Packet Pg. 122
6.4.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
FUND
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCE;
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
SPECIAL REVENUE
12/31/2019
3/31/2020
6/30/2020
Q2
YTD
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 39,839
$ 103,012 $
77,411
$ (25,601) $
37,572
1 1 1 - Street Fund
1,298,473
1,058,743
1,088,447
29,704
(210,02E
112- Combined Street Const/Improve
1,421,769
2,510,488
2,197,489
(312,999)
775,72C
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
634,011
636,762
647,244
10,482
13,23: o
118 - Memorial Street Tree
19,785
19,928
20,012
84
227
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
93,013
106,944
96,191
(10,753)
3,17E W
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
86,844
95,528
96,987
1,459
10,14C
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund
13,600
13,075
13,303
228
,@
(29c
7
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
72,101
78,166
80,804
2,638
8,701 c
125 -Real Estate Tax 2 *
2,625,364
2,683,963
2,507,321
(176,642)
(118,04: LL
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1
2,486,325
2,426,874
2,177,940
(248,934)
(308,38`.
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
332,255
351,290
337,990
(13,300)
5,73E V
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
260,685
244,205
255,125
10,920
(5,56C 3
136 - Parks Trust Fund
163,071
164,250
164,942
692
1,871 0
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,053,314
1,063,167
1,070,881
7,714
17,56-1 c
138 - Sister City Commission
10,129
10,191
12,734
2,543
2,60E
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
11,546
28,362
19,465
(8,897)
7,91�
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd
1 112
18,783
32,446
1 13,663
32,334 3
Total Special Revenue
1 $ 10,622,237
$ 11,613,731 $
10,896,734
1 $ (716,997) $
274,49-1
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 125 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding
Special Revenue Funds
12
10
8
c
•2 6 $11.61
$10.62 $10.90
4
2 REA
Dec 2019 Mar 2020 June 2020
■ Special
Revenue
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
36
Packet Pg. 123
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
I 6.4.a I
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
421
-Water Utility Fund
422
- Storm Utility Fund
423
- Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund
424
- Bond Reserve Fund
411
-Combined Utility Operation
Total Enterprise Funds
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 3/31 /2020 6/30/2020
$ 23,049,550 $ 24,053,743 $ 22,708,684 $
12,607,151 12,584,653 11,522,128
46,572,051 47,460,885 47,580,092
843,961 843,965 843,968
- 29,880 30,710
$ 83,072,713 $ 84,973,126 $ 82,685,581 $
CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
(1,345,060) $
(1,062,525)
119,207
3
830
(2,287,545) $
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding
50,000,000
45,000,000
40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000, 000
0
Enterprise and Agency Fund Balances as of June 30, 2020
$47,580,092
Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP
(340,86-1
(1,085,022
1,008,04C
o
m
30,71 C W
(387,13� 2
c
c
ii
21
`m
CJ
0
N
O
N
N
C
7
7
$843,968 $154,816
Bond Reserve Firemen's Pension
Fund
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
37
Packet Pg. 124
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
I 6.4.a I
FUND BALANCES
CITY-WIDE
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 3/31 /2020 6/30/2020
Governmental Funds
$ 36,116,077 $ 33,540,192 $ 34,951,202
$
Enterprise Funds
83,072,713 84,973,126 82,685,581
Internal Services Fund
10,803,067 10,908,350 11,259,633
Agency Funds
146,733 123,716 154,816
Total City-wide Total
$130,138,590 $129,545,384 $129,051,233
1 $
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
Q2 YTD
1,411,010 $ (1,164,87°
0
(2,287,545) (387,132 m
351,283 456,56E
0
31,100 8,084 U
(494,151) $ (1,087,357
ii
21
L
L
CY
Governmental Fund Balances (Excluding General Fund) as of June 30, 2020 N
Drag Enforcement Fund
Street Fund
Combined Street Const/Improve Fund
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
Memorial Street Fund
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
Employee Parking Permit Fund
Youth Scholarship Fund
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
Real Estate Excise Tax 2
Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq
Gifts Catalog Fund
Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
Parks Trust Fund
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
Sister City Commission
Business Improvement District
Parks Capital Construction Fund
622
$- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,OOC
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
0
N
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
38
Packet Pg. 125 1
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
I 6.4.a I
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
512 -Technology Rental Fund
Total Internal Service Funds
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000, 000
6,000, 000
4,000, 000
2,000, 000
K:$786,798
Dec 2019
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 3/31 /2020 6/30/2020
$ 10,016,269 $ 10,173,544 $ 10,412,411 $
786,798 734,806 847,223
$ 10,803,067 $ 10,908,350 $ 11,259,633 1 $
Internal Service Fund Balances
�J
$734,806
Mar2020
$10,412,411
$847,223
June 2020
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
Q2
YTD
p
238,867 $
396,14",
Q.
112,417
60,42E
W
.@
351,283 $
456,56E
c
c
ii
21
L
L
CY
Q
N
O
N
N
C
■ 511- Equipment Rental Fund
■ 512 - Technology Rental Fund
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
39
Packet Pg. 126 1
6.4.b
GENERAL FUND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(Jan -June)
2020
(Jan -June)
Beginning Fund Balance
6,446,380
9,359,435
9,841,718
10,273,343
11,233,278
15,552,188
Revenue
Taxes
28,714,539
29,403,794
29,572,203
30,755,578
15,965,086
14,966,286
Licenses and permits
2,132,897
2,269,313
2,506,800
2,401,855
970,879
1,224,166
Intergovernmental
977,585
1,261,998
890,572
1,014,434
374,473
373,701
Charges for services
5,150,816
5,403,786
5,463,913
5,810,961
3,270,311
2,647,090
Fines and forfeitures
535,078
522,051
459,929
616,783
272,250
143,579
Investment earnings
70,045
(26,712)
154,739
273,226
200,748
143,897
Miscellaneous
435,414
441,432
471,675
931,495
187,490
111,384
Transfers in
822,175
82,695
26,300
75,884
13,150
17,900
Debt proceeds
-
549,095
-
-
-
-
Sale of capital assets
-
58,451
7,143
5,273
-
-
Insurance recoveries
-
-
-
15,570
-
-
Total Revenue
38,838,549
39,965,902
39,553,274
41,901,058
21,254,387
19,628,003
Expenditures
General government
8,836,333
9,969,187
9,714,867
10,288,694
5,827,484
6,130,868
Public safety
19,371,912
20,128,896
22,228,871
22,585,212
11,935,501
11,643,388
Transportation
3,600
3,600
3,600
4,779
2,924
2,924
Economic environment
1,353,548
1,313,430
1,551,152
1,460,763
742,029
806,053
Mental and physical health
69,762
70,814
126,791
178,859
75,044
117,048
Culture and recreation
3,591,029
3,773,633
3,959,731
4,331,806
1,957,406
1,822,013
c
Debt service
272,793
196,663
198,361
197,694
7,023
69,285
0.
a)Capital
outlay
92,202
56,662
90,573
93,105
-
91053
W
Transfers out
2,334,315
3,414,141
1,247,703
1,800,212
625,579
449,033
c°
Debt refunding
-
556,593
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures
35,925,494
39,483,619
39,121,649
40,941,124
21,172,989
21,049,664
r-
ii
Prior Period Adjustments
-
-
-
-
Z.
Change in position
L
r
2,913,055
482,283
431,625
959,934
81,398
(1,421,661)
Ending Fund Balance
M
0
Cy
9,359,435
9,841,718
10,273,343
11,233,278
11,314,676
14,130,527
0
N
O
N
C
7
\\edmsvr-deptfs\finance\Finance Committee\2020\Jan-June P&L 7/21/2020 Packet Pg. 127
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Joint Meeting with the Planning Board
Staff Lead: Shane Hope / Daniel Robles (PB Chair)
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Rob Chave
Background/History
This is a periodic joint meeting with members of the Planning Board.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss matters of mutual interest with the Council to provide feedback and direction. Part of the focus
should be on the Planning Board's work program for the following year.
Narrative
The following comprises the Planning Board's current 2020-2021 work program. This can form the basis
for the discussion with the City Council to enable the Council to give specific feedback on its priorities to
guide the Board's work during the next year. Please refer to the Planning Board's minutes from July 81n
and February 26t" for further detail and discussion.
The Planning Board approved the following on February 26th, 2020:
A. PLANNING BOARD WORK PRIORITIES
Development Code Updates
1 Code updates implementing the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), including
updates to tree regulations**
2 Code updates reflecting Climate Code Goals, including electric vehicle charging
infrastructure**
3 Low -impact subdivision code updates**
4 Code updates related to sidewalks requirements for new development **
5. Architectural Design Board (ADB) design review process
6 Neighborhood Center Plans and Implementation
7 Buildable Lands
8 Housing policies and implementation
9 Further Highway 99 Subarea Plan Implementation
10 Other periodic updates on planning activities
** Denotes highest priority items.
B. UPDATES TO THE PLANNING BOARD
1 Parks and Recreation (quarterly)
Packet Pg. 128
7.1
2 Housing Commission activities
3 Low-impact/stormwater review and updates
4 Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2050 Process
5 Capital Projects
6 Comprehensive Plan
C. JOINT MEETINGS
1 City Council - High priority
2 Economic Development Commission - High priority
3 Architectural Design Board - As applicable
4 Tree Board - As applicable
D. LIAISONS WITH OTHER CITIZEN BOARDS
1 Economic Development Commission - Board Member Pence
2 City Council meetings, 3-minute updates
3 Architectural Design Board - Chair Robles
4 Housing Commission - Board Member Pence
5 Planning Board Community Outreach Coordinator - Board Member Crank
E. INCREASE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN PLANNING BOARD TOPICS
1 Goal is to have three citizens attend/step to the lectern each meeting
2 Add agenda item to identify and contact audiences who would have an interest in NEXT
meeting agenda items - City outreach content
3 Coordinate with new City staff person for Planning Board outreach
4 Encourage student member to actively encourage youth participation
5 Reach out to the Youth Commission
6 Inform 'the public of topics of interest.
The Board's work program has been disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the Board
remains committed to doing as much as possible in the months ahead.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Planning Board minutes 7-8-2020
Exhibit 1: Planning Board minutes 2-26-2020
Packet Pg. 129
7.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Virtual Meeting
Via Zoom
July 8, 2020
Chair Robles called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their
sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Daniel Robles, Chair
Mike Rosen, Vice Chair
Todd Cloutier
Alicia Crank
Nathan Monroe
Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig
Roger Pence
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Matthew Cheung (excused)
Conner Bryan, Student Representative
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
BOARD MEMBER CRANK MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 2020 BE APPROVED AS
PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER RUBENKONIG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY, WITH CHAIR ROBLES ABSTAINING.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There were no audience comments.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Chair Robles referred the Board to the Development Services Director's Report that was provided in the packet. Board
Member Pence noted that the report shows that the City's current population is 42,470, an increase of 300 residents. He
asked how many new dwelling units were added during that same period of time. Mr. Chave agreed to contact the City
Packet Pg. 130
7.1.a
Clerk's Office for more information. Board Member Pence requested information about the Snohomish County Tomorrow
Steering Committee's methodology for the Buildable Lands Report. Mr. Chave agreed to provide a link to the information
on the Snohomish County Tomorrow website.
I� 1I:�\�1�►[!i_�� � '71 II►�Il�i�L�7 :7 :� � :Z�Z!'J 7���
Mr. Chave reviewed that the Board last discussed this subject on February 26r''. This discussion is an opportunity for the
Board to review its 2020 Work Program one more time in preparation for a joint meeting with the City Council on July 28r''.
The Board's approved work program would be submitted as part of the meeting materials for the joint meeting.
Chair Robles commented that the 2020 Work Program the Board approved in February will need to be adjusted given the
time remaining in the year. He suggested they review the list of work items again, identifying those that should move
forward in 2020 and those that would be carried over into 2021. Mr. Chave said another option would be identify what they
hope to work on over the next year (not calendar year), and then highlight the priority items.
Board Member Rubenkonig said she would like to keep the work program intact for now. As they approach the end of the
year, the items they didn't get to in 2020 could be moved to the 2021 Work Program. Chair Robles agreed that the current
2020 Work Program would work well as a baseline. He commented that nothing about 2020 has been normal, and he doesn't
expect the future to be any more or less normal. This makes it difficult to prioritize. Given the staffs limitations, the
Board's agenda will need to operate opportunistically.
While she doesn't disagree with Board Member Rubenkonig's recommendation, Board Member Crank felt it would behoove
the Board to revisit the list again, identifying at least a few projects that could feasibly be accomplished in 2020. Vice Chair
Rosen agreed. He recalled that one reason the Board created the 2020 Work Program was to present it to the City Council for
input and direction. He observed that both Director Hope and Mr. Chave are in good positions to understand the City's
priorities, and he would like to hear from them about what they believe the priorities should be.
Board Member Cloutier said it is important for the Board to review the 2020 Work Program in light of the current pandemic
to identify what the Board can do to help. For example, he asked if there is anything the Board could do related to City
regulations and accommodations to appropriately aid homeless individuals. Also, is there anything the Board should be
considering related to the hospital district? Mr. Chave agreed this is a good subject to bring up when meeting with the City
Council. They've been discussing a variety of issues and may have a few ideas they want the Planning Board to investigate.
Board Member Pence pointed out that City boards and commissions are still operating under the constraints imposed by the
Governor that only essential and routine matters can be considered as they meet in virtual mode. They should keep this in
mind as they prioritize their agenda and set aside those items that do not fit into that category until the governor changes the
rules.
Director Hope reviewed that the Governor placed certain restrictions on the Open Public Meetings Act in the early stages of
the pandemic. The rule stipulated that government bodies could only meet to discuss issues that were necessary and routine
or Covid-19 related. That rule has expired, and the City's council, boards and commissions can now discuss other issues.
However, there are still restrictions that prevent regular public meetings, and the Board will need to keep these restrictions in
mind as they review their work program. In addition to the restrictions on boards and commissions, staff is having to deal
with additional work related to the pandemic. Also, the department was unable to move forward with hiring an additional
staff person to work on planning issues.
The Board reviewed the 2020 Work Plan as follows:
• Planning Board Priorities
Director Hope said that, in her discussions with City Council Members, a few things have been identified as particularly
important: updating the tree regulations and implementing the Urban Forest Management Plan, updating the subdivision
code, and updating the code to be more environmentally friendly and reduce the carbon footprint For example, adding
requirements for electric vehicle charging stations and bicycle storage would make it easier for people to use alternative
Planning Board Minutes
July 8, 2020 Page 2
Packet Pg. 131
7.1.a
means of transportation. These requirements will be especially important as new development occurs. She said staff
would like to focus on these priorities.
Director Hope said new projects related to the pandemic and homelessness could come up, but she isn't aware of any at
this time. She agreed with Mr. Chave that the Board should discuss this issue with the City Council. She said staff
would also like to move forward as quickly as possible to implement the recommendations that come from the Housing
Commission's work. It is likely that these recommendations will include amendments to the Accessory Dwelling Unit
(ADU) regulations. In addition, the Board will need to work on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that, when the Board last discussed its 2020 Work Program, the thought was that
implementing the Urban Forest Management Plan went hand -in -hand with updating the tree regulations. Director Hope
said one of the recommendations in the Urban Forest Management Plan is to update the tree regulations. Board Member
Rubenkonig noted that this item is already listed as the top priority. She asked if staff wants to keep that item as a top
priority and further call out the tree regulations as a specific part of that discussion. Director Hope agreed that would be
appropriate.
Board Member Rubenkonig noted that low -impact subdivision code updates were also identified as a top priority in the
2020 Work Program. She asked if that is still staff s intent, or if the subdivision code update would be broader. Director
Hope responded that the intent is to update the subdivision code to incorporate low -impact development provisions.
Director Hope said sidewalk requirements for new development have been on the staffs list for a long time. The issue
has come up due to concerns that some development has occurred recently without any sidewalks. This is a priority of at
least some City Council Members, and it would be an appropriate topic to add to the Board's 2020 Work Program.
Board Member Pence asked when Director Hope intends to hire the new planner. Director Hope said she doesn't have a
timeline, and she is currently waiting for Mayor Nelson's approval. Because of the pandemic, new hiring has been put
on hold for the time being. She is hoping to get clearance to hire by fall.
Chair Robles summarized that it appears the Board's top priorities line up with the priorities expressed by the City
Council: code updates to implement the Urban Forest Management Plan (including updates to the tree regulations), code
updates reflecting climate code goals (electric vehicle charging infrastructures), and low -impact subdivision code
updates. The Board agreed to add an additional item as a priority: code updates related to sidewalks requirements for
new development. He suggested that the remaining items on the Board's list of priorities would likely roll into 2021.
Mr. Chave suggested they put an asterisk by the top priority items with a note below indicating that they are the Board's
highest priorities, and other items may have to wait until next year.
• Updates to the Planning Board
Board Member Rubenkonig said she doesn't want to eliminate any of the updates.
Board Member Pence observed that some of the updates to the Planning Board tend to be more in-depth and ramble on
longer than necessary. He suggested that the updates should be presented to the Board in a more compact form. For
example, the agenda for the July 22nd meeting includes only an update from the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Department. He felt the update could be shortened and doesn't need to consume the entire meeting.
• Joint Meetings
Board Member Rubenkonig suggested the Board reconsider and prioritize the Board's meetings with other boards and
commissions in 2020.
Board Member Crank said it is important to keep in mind that not all boards and commissions are meeting at this time.
Director Hope said that, as of this month, there are still a few groups that haven't met since the pandemic started. The
Economic Development Commission met for the first time in June, but the Architectural Design Board has not met.
Board Member Crank cautioned that the Board should be mindful that other groups might still be trying to catch up after
Planning Board Minutes
July 8, 2020 Page 3
Packet Pg. 132
7.1.a
not meeting for a while. She said she would prioritize a joint meeting with the Economic Development Commission
given the economic impacts associated with the pandemic. There has been a lot of discussion in the community about
streets in the downtown being shut down on weekends to support local businesses and allow them to remain viable and
somewhat profitable during the pandemic. She imagines that these conversations will continue, and some requests may
require zoning changes and expediency will be important. Board Member Rubenkonig recommended the Board discuss
this with the City Council, suggesting that the Board could meet jointly with the Economic Development Commission to
consider potential zoning changes. Board Member Crank agreed that would be appropriate.
Board Member Rubenkonig said she would also like to meet jointly with the Tree Board, as the Board prepares to
consider potential updates to the tree regulations.
Chair Robles summarized that the Board would like to prioritize their joint meetings as follows: City Council, Economic
Development Commission, Tree Board, and Architectural Design Board.
• Liaison's with Other Citizen Boards and Increasing Public Engagement in Planning Board Topics
Board Member Rubenkonig commented that having representatives keep apprised of what is happening with other
citizen boards and commissions would have no impact on the Board's ability to complete its priority projects. She felt
these assignments should continue. She also felt that the Board's ideas for increasing public engagement in Planning
Board topics should continue as outlined in the 2020 Work Program.
• Summary
Chair Robles summarized that, as discussed, the Board's top priorities are as follows: code updates to implement the
Urban Forest Management Plan (including updates to the tree regulations), code updates reflecting climate code goals
(electric vehicle charging infrastructures), low -impact subdivision code updates, code updates related to sidewalk
requirements for new development, and review and provide recommendations on requests related to economic
development during the pandemic. In addition to this work, the Board's agenda for the remainder of the year could
include a few updates as needed or appropriate. The remaining items on the work program would most likely be
postponed until 2021.
Board Member Crank cautioned that the City Council will most likely have some opposing viewpoints on what the
Board's priorities should be.
Board Member Rubenkonig commented that putting in place temporary situations that the City Council might be
comfortable with in accommodating businesses during the pandemic isn't going to be a permanent development code
update. Therefore, it shouldn't be included on the Board's list of priorities. Instead, she felt it would be more
appropriate for the Board to request an opportunity to meet jointly with the Economic Development Commission to
discuss these matters and provide input to the City Council.
Chair Robles cautioned that the work program should be simple, recognizing that the Board's activities will depend on
the work of the Planning Department staff. Mr. Chave said the simplest approach would be to use the same list, adding
an asterisk to indicate the highest priority items under "Development Code Updates" as discussed by the Board. The rest
of the list could remain intact.
Vice Chair Robles reminded the Board of Director Hope's comments, indicating what appears to be most important to
the City Council. In addition, the Board should recognize that it is the City Council's prerogative to adjust the agenda as
it sees fit. The Board agreed to utilize Mr. Chave's approach and present the document to the City Council with one
additional priority (sidewalks requirements for new development) and asterisks to indicate the Board's top priorities.
At the joint meeting with the City Council, Vice Chair Rosen suggested that the Board present the 2020 Work Program
as quickly and simply as possible. This will give each City Council Member an opportunity to weigh in and for the
Board Members to respond. Mr. Chave agreed that is good advice. He suggested the Board provide an introduction to
the City Council, hitting on the highest priorities and letting the rest of it speak for itself.
Planning Board Minutes
July 8, 2020 Page 4
Packet Pg. 133
7.1.a
Chair Robles as if there is a work statement for each of the items on the priority list. Without this information, he voiced
concern that the Board Members may not be able to respond articulately to questions from City Council Members. Mr.
Chave said staff would be present at the joint meeting to provide added explanations. Board Member Rubenkonig added
that the February 26t' meeting minutes provide a good introduction for each of the items on the priority list. Chair
Robles encouraged the Board Members to review the information prior to the joint meeting. Mr. Chave said the minutes
would also be included in the City Council's packet for the joint meeting.
Chair Robles agreed to reach out to the City Council President to discuss the format for the joint meeting. Director Hope
advised that the joint meeting is scheduled for July 28d' at 7:00 p.m., and it will be a virtual meeting via Zoom. At this
time, she doesn't know what the order of the agenda will be. She said she would send each of the Board Members a link
to the Zoom meeting.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Robles announced that the July 22nd meeting agenda will include an update from the Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Department. A joint meeting with the City Council is scheduled for July 28r''. The August 12' meeting agenda will
include a discussion on development code work (electric vehicle charging infrastructure, tree regulations, etc.) It will also
include an update on the permanent Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Two public hearings are scheduled for August
26r' on proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps. One would change the designation of 21 properties
from Single Family Resource to Single Family Urban 1. The other would change the designation for 1.04 acres from
Neighborhood Commercial to Multifamily Medium Density. Lastly, Chair Robles said the September 91 agenda will include
a public hearing on the permanent Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and discussions on potential code changes (tree
regulations and electric vehicle charging infrastructure). The remaining extended agenda will be formulated based on the
results of the joint meeting with the City Council.
Board Member Pence asked if the Board would receive briefings prior to the two public hearings on August 26t1i. Mr. Chave
responded that the Board can't have separate briefings because everything has to be part of the public record for the hearings.
While there are some legislative aspects, the two applications are primarily quasi-judicial in nature and appearance of fairness
is very important. The Board can't have a separate discussion without the applicants being part of the it. Typically, the
entire process takes place in one public hearing: staff introduction/briefing, applicant presentation, public comments, Board
deliberation, and Board recommendation. The Board Members will receive information prior to the meeting to help them
study and develop questions, but they can't have a separate briefing on the issues.
Mr. Chave advised that staff will present a development activity report to the City Council at the end of July, and Director
Hope will make a similar presentation to the Planning Board, as well.
Board Member Rubenkonig referred to Board Member Pence's earlier comments related to the August 28' meeting agenda
and reminded the Board that the burden is on the applicants to show that their proposed changes meet the criteria outlined in
the Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Chave advised that the staff report will review each of the criteria.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Robles thanked Vice Chair Rosen for leading the last two meetings. He did a great job.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Vice Chair Rosen announced that $100,000 stands between the City retaining or losing its Chamber of Commerce by the end
of the year. Without the Chamber, there would be no 4t1i of July parade or fireworks, no Halloween event, no car show, no
Taste of Edmonds, and a variety of other activities. A fundraising campaign is currently in progress to raise the money by the
end of the year to help preserve these events.
Board Member Crank announced that the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County and the Everett Herald will present the
Emerging Heroes Awards at a virtual event on July 9t''. She will be the keynote speaker at the event, and it is important to
Planning Board Minutes
July 8, 2020 Page 5
Packet Pg. 134
7.1.a
note that 2 of the 12 honorees are from Edmonds. One of the honorees is Courtney Whooten, who is well known as a
community organizer. One of her most recent projects was the very successful Black History Month event that was held at
the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Another honoree is Craig Olsen, who is the Vice President of Sales and part owner of
Washington Energy Services. She encouraged the Board Members to read about the honorees in the Everett Business
Journal.
Board Member Crank recalled a discussion the Board had in 2019 regarding the use of social media. She commented that the
City has recently stepped up its social media game and now has a pretty active Facebook page, as well as a Twitter account.
It is good to see the City communicating events and other information, especially around the pandemic. She reported that a
culturally -insensitive post was made today on Facebook but has since been deleted. Her hope is that the person running the
City's social media sites will get some sensitivity training. She cautioned all Board Members to be careful of how they
communicate on social media.
Board Member Crank pointed out that the Governor has mandated that everyone wear masks in situations where social
distancing is not possible. She has subtly reached out to the City staff and leadership, asking them to consider having a
diversity of masks. The ones she has been advocating for are called the smile masks, which are the clear mouth kind. There
are members of the community who are deaf or hard of hearing, and this is something her work place has been pushing as
they work with people with disabilities. She shared an example of the type of mask she is advocating for and agreed to share
information with the Board Members and staff about where to purchase them. She encouraged the City to provide similar
masks to staff members who interact with the community.
ADJOURNMENT
The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:14 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
July 8, 2020 Page 6
Packet Pg. 135
7.1.b
Vice Chair Rosen shared an example of a system he has seen used for water conservation which could apply. The objective
was how to keep water -usage levels the same for a very large metropolitan area despite 10 years of growth. The best and
cheapest approach was to reduce consumption by educating the public, offering rebates and encouraging people to modify
their behavior. For example, a toilet has a dollar value based on the average number of times it is flushed and the amount of
water that is used for each flush, and the same would be true for a frontload washing machine. Another approach was to
encourage people to change their shower heads and take shorter showers. They were able to identify a formula that made it
very easy to prioritize and throw dollars at because they could calculate a return on investment. Because a dollar value was
identified, people were able to receive rebates when switching to more energy efficient alternatives. Within one year, the
public responded so well that the program was discontinued because there wasn't enough money coming in to populate the
utility. The system worked well to both visualize and track. It seems the City has been struggling with a way to calculate
and track the benefits associated with each of the strategies. Chair Robles added that the City's program is also missing
incentives that entice people to change behaviors.
Board Member Rubenkonig said it seems odd that the City doesn't have more quantifiable ways to measure success. Vice
Chair Rosen commented that the science already exists for any of the strategies and metrics in the plan that are aimed at
reducing GHG.
Mr. Lien advised that the Board would be kept in the loop as the Climate Action Plan is updated.
PLANNING BOARD 2020 WORK PROGRAM
Chair Robles reviewed that the Board has had discussions over the past few months regarding their goals and priorities for
2020. The discussion has included what the Board wants to get done this year and what the staff can support. He and Vice
Chair Rosen also met with Mayor Nelson and received feedback on his priorities. The goal is to deliver the list of priorities
to the City Council for feedback at a joint meeting on March 24". He referred to the draft 2020 Planning Board Work
Program and briefly summarized the Board's previous discussions as follows:
• Development Code Updates: The Development Code amendments will require a lot of work on behalf of staff. The
list of code updates includes Urban Forest Management Plan implementation, multifamily design standards, tree
regulations, climate goal implementation, subdivision code updates, further Highway 99 implementation, and
buildable lands process.
• Neighborhood Center Plans and Implementation. The Board is interested in pursuing the development and
implementation of neighborhood plans, such as the Five Corners Subarea Plan. They discussed the design review
process with a preferred role for the Architectural Design Board. The Board would also like to pursue housing
policies and implementation, as directed by the Housing Commission, and electrical vehicle infrastructure and bicycle
storage requirements.
• Updates to the Planning Board. The Board will receive periodic updates from the Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Manager and Housing Commission. Staff will also provide progress reports on the Puget Sound Regional
Council's Vision 2050 process, the Stormwater Manual update, capital projects, and Comprehensive Plan
amendments.
• Outreach. The Board discussed the need to improve public outreach, which can be a topic of discussion at the joint
meeting with the City Council on March 24th
• Joint Meetings. The Board will meet jointly with the City Council on March 24'. The Board also expressed a desire
to meet jointly with the Architectural Design Board during the 2°d quarter of 2020. In addition, the Board may meet
jointly with the Tree Board and Economic Development Commission, as applicable.
• Other Citizen Boards (Liaison). The Board indicated a desire for better communication with other City boards and
commissions, and possibly assigning Planning Board representatives to attend their meetings and report back on
applicable items. As discussed at the last meeting, the representatives would not be formal liaison assignments.
Board Member Pence agreed to represent the Board with the Economic Development Commission and Housing
Planning Board Minutes
February 26, 2020 Page 7
Packet Pg. 136
7.1.b
Commission, and Chair Robles the Architectural Design Board. They also discussed that Board Member Crank could
serve as the Planning Board's Community Outreach Liaison. In addition, the Chair and/or Vice Chair will present
brief updates to the City Council.
Increase public engagement in Planning Board Topics. The goal is to have at least three citizens attend and
comment at each meeting. The Board expressed a desire to use social media to inform the public about upcoming
Planning Board topics. The City Attorney indicated this would be fine, as long as none of the Board Members share
comments that give the impression they are speaking on behalf of the Board. Mayor Nelson agreed it was a good idea,
and the City is hiring a part-time Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist. Chair Robles suggested that
Board Member Crank work directly with this new employee on Planning Board community outreach. The Board also
discussed how to increase public engagement in Planning Board topics, and one specific idea was to add an agenda
item to identify and contact audiences who could have interest in the next meeting agenda.
Denise Miller, Edmonds, said she represents the Edmonds Neighborhood Action Coalition and the Sierra Club, and
she attends most City meetings. She is part of the Housing Commission, as well as the Mayor's Conservation
Advisory Board. She attends meetings of the Tree Board and the Edmonds Port Commission. She commented that
some boards and commissions form citizen subcommittees to review and provide feedback on a particular issue. This
results in more buy -in and a group that can tell you what you are doing right and wrong. Transparency is one of the
biggest complaints she hears, and usually it is because the information is hard to find. The City is working to improve
its website, which should help. She suggested that the Board reach out to some of the community activists to hear
thoughts on what the Board could do to encourage public engagement at their meetings.
• Planning Board General Expectations. The Board agreed that each agenda should generally consume 90 minutes,
but meetings could run longer as needed. The first half of the meeting would include public comments and
presentations from the various boards and commissions, and the second half would be dedicated to deep -diving into
code review, updates and revisions. The Chair and Vice Chair would support a brisk and productive pace. There is a
concern about potential staff shortages. Staff s ability to support a denser Planning Board schedule might require the
Board to cancel a few meetings so staff can catch up and prepare Staff Reports.
Chair Robles summarized that the Board has met with staff and discussed the proposed work plan at their retreat. The Chair
and Vice Chair have validated the ideas with Mayor Nelson, and they are working with staff to populate the Planning Board's
calendar. They are scheduled to meet with Mayor Nelson quarterly, and a joint meeting with the City Council is scheduled
for March 241.
VICE CHAIR ROSEN MOVED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE PROPOSED 2020 WORK PROGRAM, AS
FOLLOWS:
A. PLANNING BOARD PRIORITIES
Development Code Updates
• Code updates implementing the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP)
• Code updates reflecting Climate Code Goals
• Low -impact subdivision code updates
• Further Highway 99 Subarea Plan Implementation
• Buildable Lands
• Neighborhood Center Plans and Implementation
• Architectural Design Board (ADB) design review process
• Housing policies and implementation
• Electric vehicle charging infrastructure and bicycle storage requirements
B. UPDATES TO THE PLANNING BOARD
• Parks and Recreation (quarterly)
• Housing Commission activities
Planning Board Minutes
February 26, 2020 Page 8
Packet Pg. 137
7.1.b
• Low-impact/stormwater review and updates
• Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2050 Process
• Capital Projects
• Comprehensive Plan
C. JOINT MEETINGS
• City Council — let Quarter (Tentative March 24t'')
• Architectural Design Board — 2°a Quarter
• Economic Development Commission — As applicable
• Tree Board — As applicable
D. OTHER CITIZEN BOARDS
• Economic Development Commission — Board Member Pence
• City Council meetings, 3-minute updates
• Architectural Design Board — Chair Robles
• Housing Commission — Board Member Pence
• Planning Board Community Outreach Coordinator — Board Member Crank
E. INCREASE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN PLANNING BOARD TOPICS
• Goal is to have three citizens attend/step to the lectern each meeting
• Add agenda item to identify and contact audiences who would have an interest in NEXT meeting
agenda items — City outreach content
• Coordinate with new City staff person for Planning Board outreach
• Encourage student member to actively encourage youth participation
• Reach out to the Youth Commission
• Inform the public of topics of interest.
HE FURTHER MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE PROPOSED 2020 WORK PLAN TO THE CITY
COUNCIL IN ADVANCE OF THE JOINT MEETING. BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG SECONDED THE
MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Robles suggested there are three potential opportunities to cancel Planning Board meetings. The Board is scheduled to
meet jointly with the City Council on March 24t' and they could cancel their March 25t' meeting. The Board's April 8"
meeting falls during the Easter/Passover week, and that might be a good meeting to cancel. The May 27" meeting follows
Memorial Day and could also be cancelled. He agreed to discuss these dates with staff, so the Board can make a decision at
their next meeting. The Board will also review the draft 2020 Work Plan one more time before meeting jointly with the City
Council.
Chair Robles referred to the agenda for the March 11' meeting and asked the Board for feedback on who the target audience
might be. The March 1 I' agenda will include updates on the Housing Commission's Work, the Building Lands process, and
the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Vision 2050 Process. He suggested that perhaps members of the Architectural
Design Board (ADB) could be invited to attend. Mr. Chave suggested the Board wait to invite the ADB to attend until after
the joint meeting and the Board has received feedback from the City Council. He advised that Ms. Hope would present the
Housing Commission update, and Mr. Lien would present the Buildable Lands update.
Mr. Chave explained that the Buildable Lands Analysis is a work program that is centered on Snohomish County working
with the various cities. It is required by state law and feeds into local jurisdictions as they look at their capacity to handle
growth. It is primarily a technical exercise that provides input into local jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan processes. No
Planning Board Minutes
February 26, 2020 Page 9
Packet Pg. 138
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Proposed Amendment to ECC 2.10.010 for Council review of appointive positions
Staff Lead: Mayor Mike Nelson
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson
Background/History
During the July 21, 2020 Council meeting, Council discussed an amendment to ECC 2.10.010, entitled
"Review of vacancies, appointment authority and confirmation process." The proposed code
amendment would create an exception to the three -candidate rule which would allow the Mayor to
forward only one candidate to Council for interview and appointment should that one candidate have
been performing in an "acting" capacity of the appointive office for at least 6 months. After discussion
Council determined that the topic should be forwarded to the next Council meeting for action.
Staff Recommendation
Review and take action on proposed code changes.
Narrative
Staff is providing two options for code amendments for Council consideration. There is an ordinance in
the packet for each option, but only one of the two ordinances should be adopted. One option is the
code amendment as previously presented to Council, except that the six-month qualifying period has
been reduced to three months. This change would allow confirmation to occur prior to the expiration of
the acting appointment. The second option includes additional changes to provide consistency between
the possibility of acting director confirmation and the timing of the mayor's recruiting obligation by
allowing for a delay in active recruiting should the Mayor be considering the permanent appointment of
an acting director. The second option also includes language that makes it so that any appointment of
an acting director after the initial appointment would require council confirmation.
Attachments:
2020-07-23 alternate ordinance adopting modification to confirmation process(Final)
2020-07-23 ordinance adopting modification to confirmation process
Packet Pg. 139
8.1.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
THREE -INTERVIEW REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH
THE CITY COUNCIL' S CONFIRMATION OF THE MAYOR'S
APPOINTMENT OF APPOINTIVE OFFICERS.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.12.090 states that the mayor shall have the power of appointment
and removal of all appointive officers and employees; and
WHEREAS, that statute also provides that confirmation by the city council of
appointments of officers and employees shall be required only when the council by ordinance,
provides for confirmation of such appointments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has had an ordinance requiring the confirmation of
certain mayoral appointments dating back to at least 1999 (and probably dating back
significantly further than that); and
WHEREAS, since at least 1999, the Edmonds City Code has contained some version of a
requirement to interview the top three candidates prior to confirming the mayor's appointment,
but the council's practice with regard to interviewing candidates did not always conform to the
code; and
WHEREAS, in 2014, the code was expressly modified to create some reasonable
exceptions to the three -interview requirement, exceptions which can only be implemented by a
supermajority vote of the city council; and
WHEREAS, the mayor has asked the city council to consider creating another exception
to the three -interview requirement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed exception is narrowly tailored to apply only where the mayor
would like the council to confirm someone who has served the City of Edmonds in an acting
director capacity for at least three months; and
WHEREAS, such an exception makes sense because the mayor and council would have
ample opportunity to judge the performance of such a candidate prior to confirmation, and
Packet Pg. 140
8.1.a
therefore, would know much more about such a candidate than could ever be learned through
merely conducting an interview; and
WHEREAS, the proposed exception would still require a supermajority vote of the city
council to waive the three -interview requirement; and
WHEREAS, other revisions to the code are necessary to allow recruitment to be deferred
to allow for an acting director to be evaluated; and
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Sections ECC 2.10.010, entitled "Review of vacancies, appointment authority
and confirmation process," and section ECC 2.10.040, entitled "Terms and extensions of terms,"
are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
2.10.010 Review of vacancies, appointment authority and confirmation
process.
A. Periodically, when the city conducts a salary survey regarding its
nonrepresented employees, and whenever a vacancy occurs in one of the positions
listed in this chapter, the city council may review the specifications for the
appointive officer position(s) and revise them as needed before acting to confirm
a permanent appointment. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent
the city council from reviewing such specifications at other times. The council's
revising of a specification will not have any effect on a previously confirmed
permanent appointment. Recruitment to fill a vacant appointive office may be
postponed until after the city council acts to revise the specifications or
determines them not to be in need of revision.
B. The mayor or his/her designee will review all applications and determine the
personts) with the highest qualifications. Any city council member, upon request
to the mayor, may review aM the applications received for a vacant position.
Additionally and/or alternatively, the city council may evaluate the qualifications
of an applicant or candidate for public employment in executive session pursuant
to RCW 42.30.110(1)(g).
C. If, on occasion of a vacant appointive office, the mayor elects to propose a
reorganization of the appointive offices which would alter the specifications of
Packet Pg. 141
8.1.a
the vacant appointive office, he shall have 60 days from the date of the vacancy to
introduce a reorganization proposal to the city council along with any necessary
accompanying budget amendment. If reorganization is proposed, recruitment to
fill the vacant appointive office may be postponed until after the city council acts
upon the reorganization proposal.
D. The mayor shall appoint, subject to council confirmation, the appointive
officers. The city council shall interview the top three candidates for each position
prior to the mayor's appointment; provided, that the city council may waive the
three -interview requirement by motion adopted by a majority plus one of the full
council and may opt to interview as few as two candidates for any vacant
appointive office; and further provided, that when an appointive office becomes
vacant, or is about to become vacant, again within nine months of the city
council's confirmation of the last mayoral appointment to that office, the city
council may waive an additional round of interviews, by motion adopted by a
majority plus one of the full council, and proceed immediately to confirming the
appointment of a candidate interviewed by the city council during the most recent
recruitment for that appointive office; and further provided, that when the may
appoints someone who has served for at least three months as an acting director,
pursuant to subsection E, below, the city council may, by motion adopted by
majority plus one of the full council, waive the requirement to interview an,, other
candidates and proceed immediately to confirming the he appointment. The mayor's
appointments to all other employee positions shall not be subject to city council
confirmation.
E. The mayor shall have the authority to appoint, without city council
confirmation, an acting director to perform the functions and duties of a vacant
appointive office, subject to the term limitations described in ECC 2.10.040(B);
provided, that there is budgetary authority to fill the position. The city council
shall be given written notice about any such acting appointments including the
effective date of the appointment. Acting directors shall be compensated pursuant
to applicable ordinances and personnel policies regarding acting pay.
F. The mayor shall begin recruitment of candidates to fill vacant appointive
offices no later than 30 days after the latter of the two city council actions
described in subsections (A) and (C) of this section; provided, that such
recruitment shall not be necessary where the city council opts to make an
immediate confirmation pursuant to a prior round of interviews as set forth in
subsection (D) of this section; and further provided that, where the mayor
appointed an acting director, recruitment of other candidates shall only be
required upon the passage of four months since the appointment of the acting
director without the mayor having initiated the appointment process for acting
directors as outlined in ECC 2.10.010.D.
2.10.040 Terms and extensions of terms.
Packet Pg. 142
8.1.a
A. Permanent appointive officers shall serve without a definite term.
B. The authority to hold an appointive office on an acting basis (an acting
directorship) shall expire and be deemed vacant six months after the date of the
acting appointment. If, during that six-month period, the administration has not
been able to generate sufficient interest from suitable candidates to satisfy the city
council interview requirement (see ECC 2.10.010(D)), the mayor may request an
extension of acting directorship authority from the city council, in increments of
no more than six months at a time, to allow the recruiting process to continue.
After the initial six-month term, each extension of the acting directorship shall be
subject to city council confirmation. If the initial six-month term of an acting
director expires before it can be extended, any subsequent acting director
appointment for that position shall require city council confirmation,
notwithstanding ECC 2.10.010.E.
C. Both permanent and acting appointive officers shall be at -will positions serving
at the pleasure of the mayor.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
ection 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
Packet Pg. 143
8.1.a
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 144
8.1.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
THREE -INTERVIEW REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED
WITH THE CITY COUNCIL'S CONFIRMATION OF
THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF APPOINTIVE
OFFICERS.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2020.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
6
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 145
8.1.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
THREE -INTERVIEW REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH
THE CITY COUNCIL' S CONFIRMATION OF THE MAYOR'S
APPOINTMENT OF APPOINTIVE OFFICERS.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.12.090 states that the mayor shall have the power of appointment
and removal of all appointive officers and employees; and
WHEREAS, that statute also provides that confirmation by the city council of
appointments of officers and employees shall be required only when the council by ordinance,
provides for confirmation of such appointments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has had an ordinance requiring the confirmation of
certain mayoral appointments dating back to at least 1999 (and probably dating back
significantly further than that); and
WHEREAS, since at least 1999, the Edmonds City Code has contained some version of a
requirement to interview the top three candidates prior to confirming the mayor's appointment,
but the council's practice with regard to interviewing candidates did not always conform to the
code; and
WHEREAS, in 2014, the code was expressly modified to create some reasonable
exceptions to the three -interview requirement, exceptions which can only be implemented by a
supermajority vote of the city council; and
WHEREAS, the mayor has asked the city council to consider creating another exception
to the three -interview requirement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed exception is narrowly tailored to apply only where the mayor
would like the council to confirm someone who has served the City of Edmonds in an acting
director capacity for at least three months; and
WHEREAS, such an exception makes sense because the mayor and council would have
ample opportunity to judge the performance of such a candidate prior to confirmation, and
Packet Pg. 146
8.1.b
therefore, would know much more about such a candidate than could ever be learned through
merely conducting an interview; and
WHEREAS, the proposed exception would still require a supermajority vote of the city
council to waive the three -interview requirement;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection D of ECC 2.10.010, entitled "Review of vacancies, appointment
authority and confirmation process," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfike thfo g ):
D. The mayor shall appoint, subject to council confirmation, the appointive officers. The
city council shall interview the top three candidates for each position prior to the mayor's
appointment; provided, that the city council may waive the three -interview requirement by
motion adopted by a majority plus one of the full council and may opt to interview as few as two
candidates for any vacant appointive office; and further provided, that when an appointive office
becomes vacant, or is about to become vacant, again within nine months of the city council's
confirmation of the last mayoral appointment to that office, the city council may waive an
additional round of interviews, by motion adopted by a majority plus one of the full council, and
proceed immediately to confirming the appointment of a candidate interviewed by the city
council during the most recent recruitment for that appointive office; and further provided, that
when the mayor gppoints someone who has served for at least three months as an acting director,
pursuant to subsection E, below, the city council may, by motion adopted by a majority plus one
of the full council, waive the requirement to interview any other candidates and proceed
immediately to confirmingthe he appointment. The mayor's appointments to all other employee
positions shall not be subject to city council confirmation.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
Packet Pg. 147
8.1.b
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Im
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 148
8.1.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
THREE -INTERVIEW REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED
WITH THE CITY COUNCIL'S CONFIRMATION OF
THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF APPOINTIVE
OFFICERS.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2020.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
2
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 149
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
2021-2026 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Staff Lead: Bertrand Hauss
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On June 9, 2020, staff presented this item to Committee of the Whole.
On July 21, 2020, a public hearing was held for the 2021-2026 TIP.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the 2021-2026 Transportation Improvement Program.
Narrative
The Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a transportation planning document that
identifies funded, partially funded, and unfunded projects that are planned or needed over the next six
calendar years. The TIP also identifies the expenditures and secured or reasonably expected revenues
for each of the projects included in the TIP. The City practice in preparing the TIP each year has been to
keep it financially constrained the first 3 years (2021-2023), but not the last 3 years (2024-2026).
RCW 35.77.010 requires each city to update and adopt their TIP prior to July 1st. This adoption date
couldn't be met this year since a public hearing is needed and those haven't been allowed until recently
(due to COVID-19). A copy of the adopted TIP will be submitted to Puget Sound Regional Council,
Washington State Department of Transportation, and adjacent jurisdictions after City Council approval.
Some of the projects in the TIP are shown as funded through secured or unsecured Federal / State
grants, as well as from the local funds. Due to a shortfall in transportation funding, a number of
unsecured State and Federal transportation grants have been programmed to fund projects beginning in
2024. Most transportation grants are competitive, and the success of how many grants are secured in
the future will depend on other transportation needs and funding requests in the region. Projects not
identified in this document may not be eligible for Federal / State funding.
In response to the comment made during the Public Hearing, information was obtained for 2201h St. SW
@ 841h Ave. W. Based on the 2015 Transportation Plan, the Level of Service (LOS) at 2201h St. SW @ 841h
Ave. W is LOS A (intersection delay = 8 seconds) with a projected LOS B in 2035 (intersection delay = 13
seconds). This intersection currently meets our City LOS Standards (_> LOS D).
Attachments:
2021-2026 TIP
Resolution
Packet Pg. 150
8.2
July 21st Presentation
Packet Pg. 151
8.2.a
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2021-2026)
Grant Opportunity
Project
(2021-2026)
Project Name
Purpose
Phase(s)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
New Projects (not in 2020-2025 TIP)
New Projects (not in 2020-2025 TIP) & recently submitted grant
Secured grant funding (shown in last year's TIP)
Recently secured Grant (not shown in last year's TIP)
Preservation/Maintenance Projects:
1. Annual Street Preservation
Program
Grind pavement, overlay, chip seal,
and slurry seal
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$750,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(Fund 125, Fund 126)
(Local, unidentified)
$700,000
$700,000
$700,000
$700,000
$1,420,000
$120,000
$700,000
$1,486,000
$630,000
$700,000
$1,500,000
$4,200,000
$4,406,000
2. 76th Ave. W Overlay
from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Grind pavement, overlay
the west side of 76th Ave. W. Lynnwood will be completing
the east side of the street (within their jurisdiction).
Secured Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$645,000
(Federal, secured)
(State)
(Local, General Fund)
$105,000
$45,000
$540,000
$310,000
$0
$355,000
3. Main St. Overlay from
6th Ave. to 8th Ave.
Grind pavement, 2" overlay, and curb ramps upgrades
Unsecured grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$750,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local, General Fund)
$126,000
$31,000
$624,000
$156,000
$0
$187,000
4. Citywide Signal
Improvements
Upgrade traffic signal cabinets and
improve technology
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State)
(Local, unidentified)
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,000
$0
$270,000
5. Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades
Upgrade traffic signal
Possible grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$265,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$40,000
$40,000
$225,000
$225,000
$0
$265,000
6. 100th Ave. W @ 238th St. SW
Signal Upgrades
Rebuild traffic signal system
with new signal mast arms and
new vehicle detection
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local)
$150,000
$700,000
$850,000
$0
7. Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades
Upgrade traffic signal
Possible grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$325,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$50,000
$50,000
$275,000
$75,000
$0
$125,000
TOTAL
$870,000
$1,570,000
$877,000
$3,200,000
$3,626,000
$3,250,000
Safety / Capacity Projects:
8. SR-99 Revitalization (Initial Project)
Install raised median along the entire corridor in order
to improve corridor safety (restrict left turns to / from two-way left turn
onto private driveways), a HAWK signal, and Gateway Features
Secured Grant
&
Local Funds
Design, ROW,
and
Construction
$2,000,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State, secured)
(Fund 125, Fund 126)
$700,000
$2,000,000
$2,110,000
$290,000
$3,000,000
$5,810,000
$290,000
9. SR-99 Revitalization
Install wider sidewalks, lighting improvements, capacity improvements,
and utility upgrades along entire SR-99 Corridor .
Secured Grant,
Possible Grant, and
Local Funds
Engineering
ROW, &
Construction
$2,248,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State, secured)
(Local, Traffic Impact Fee)
$1,124,000
$500,000
$1,124,000
$1,500,000
$464,000
$3,000,000
$4,500,000
$964,000
10. 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection
Improvements
Re -design intersection to reduce intersection delay and
improve level of service (LOS). Various utility
improvements are also included in the project.
Secured Grant,
Possible Grant, &
Local Funds
Design,
ROW, &
Construction
$6,042,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(Federal, secured)
Local
$351,000
$74,000
$351,000
$74,000
$271,000
$66,000
$271,000
$66,000
$5,500,000
$737,000
$702,000
$1,017,000
11. 228th St. SW Corridor imrpovements from
Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W
Widen roadway to add two-way left turn lane along stretch or
left turn lanes at specific intersections.
Install sidewalk and bike lanes.
Possible grant
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(Sound Transit, unsecured)
(Local)
$1,000,000
$1,700,000
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
$14,700,000
$0
12. SR 524 (196th St. SW) @
88th Ave W. Intersection
Improvements
Design intersection improvements and addition of guardrail on
the west side of intersection due to 12' vertical drop (grade.
adjustment to improve sight distance to be considered).
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local, traffic impact fees)
$150,000
$88,000
$150,000
$88,000
ROW acquisition
ROW
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
Local
$108,000
$108,000
$108,000
$108,000
Complete intersection improvements
Construction
$720,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$720,000
$0
$0
13. Main St. @ 9th Ave.
Installation of traffic signal or mini -roundabout.
Possible grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$588,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local, Traffic Impact Fees
$88,000
$88,000
$500,000
$500,000
$0
$588,000
E
a,
0
a
aD
E
as
0
a
E
c
0
�a
0
a
c
0
L
L
as
X_
N
co
N
O
N
N
O
N
a
N
O
N
N
O
N
r
c
as
0
M
a
Page 1
Packet Pg. 152
8.2.a
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2021-2026)
Project Name
Purpose
Grant Opportunity
Project
Phase(s)
(2021-2026)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
14. Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Widen 212th St. SW to add a WB and EB left turn lane.
Provide protected / permissive left turn phasing for both
movements shared jurisdiction with City of Lynnwood
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
(Federal)
(State)
(Local)
project costs included in Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization project
15. Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Widen 216th St. SW to add a WB and EB left turn lane.
Provide protected / permissive left turn phasing for both
movements.
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
(Federal)
(State)
(Local)
project costs included in Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization project
16. Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Widen 220th St .SW to add westbound right turn lane and
Hwy. 99 to add 2nd southbound left turn lane.
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
(Federal)
(State)
Local
project costs included in Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization project
17. SR-104 ITS Adaptive System
Install ITS Adaptive System along SR-104 from
95th PI W to 226th St. SW
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
$2,000,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$287,000
$123,000
$1,700,000
$265,000
$0
$310,000
18. SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Extend SR-104 Westbound left turn lane and complete
bicycle improvements with traffic signal
improvements.
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
&
Construction
$220,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$20,000
$20,000
$200,000
$0
$20,000
19 Westgate / SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W
Intersection Access Management
Provide safety improvements within proximity to the intersection by providing
better access management on all approaches
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
&
Construction
$543,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$543,000
$125,000
$0
$125,000
20. SR-104 @ 95th PI. W
Intersection Improvements
Provide C-Curb with left turn channelization
for access management.
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
&
Construction
$207,500
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$32,500
$5,000
$175,000
$32,500
$0
$37,500
21. SR-104 @ 238th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Install traffic signal and other
intersection improvements.
Possible Grants
&
Local Funds
Engineering,
ROW, &
Construction
$1,157,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$173,000
$27,000
$984,000
$154,000
$0
$181,000
TOTAL
$2,125, 000
$6, 525, 000
$9, 33 7, 000
$9, 690, 500
$13, 891, 500
$3, 920, 000
Pedestrian Projects:
22. Sunset Ave. Walkway
from Bell St. to Caspers St.
Provide walkway on the west side of Sunset Av.
w/ various utility upgrades.
Secured Grant,
Unsecured Grant, &
Local Funds
Engineering,
&
Construction
$44,000
(Federal, secured)
(Federal, unsecured)
(Local, Fund 421)
(Local, Fund 422)
(Local, Fund 423)
(Local)
$44,000
$75,000
$100,000
$50,000
$5,000
$687,000
$575,000
$700,000
$150,000
$687,000
$687,000
$650,000
$800,000
$200,000
$692,000
23. Citywide Pedestrian
Crossing Enhancements
Install flashing pedestrian beacons, HAWK signal, or traffic signal
at various locations
throughout the City.
Secured Grant,
&
Local Funds
Construction
$1,100,000
(Federal, secured)
(State)
(Local, General)
$1,100,000
$270,000
$0
$270,000
24. Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S
Install sidewalk on south side of Walnut St. from
6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S
Secured Grant
Engineering,
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local)
$265,000
$265,000
$0
25. Maplewood Walkway from Main St. to
200th St. SW
Install sidewalk on Maplewood St. from Main St. to 200th St. SW,
creating connection to Maplewood Elementary and Yost Park.
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$1,800,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$150,000
$150,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
26. Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S
to 9th Ave. S
Install sidewalk on Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S, creating
connections to Westgate and Sherwood Elementary Schools.
Possible grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$637,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local, Fund 422
$167,000
$38,000
$470,000
$155,000
$0
$193,000
27. 80th Ave. W Walkway from
212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
Install sidewalk on 80th Ave. W from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW,
creating connections to Chase Lake and College Place
Elementary Schools.
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$1,449,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$100,000
$110,000
$1,239,000
$0
$0
28. 80th Ave. W Walkway from
188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Install sidewalk on 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
creating connections to Seaview
Elementary School.
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$1,506,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local, Fund 422)
$315,000
$125,000
$1,191,000
$504,000
$0
$629,000
E
a,
0
L
as
E
as
0
L
Q
E
c
0
�a
0
a
c
0
L
a�
x
in
W
N
O
N
N
O
a
N
O
N
N
0
N
c
0
E
�a
a
Page 2
Packet Pg. 153
8.2.a
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2021-2026)
Project Name
Purpose
Grant Opportunity
Project
Phase(s)
(2021-2026)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
29. 95th PI. SW Walkway from
224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
Install sidewalk on 95th PI. W from
224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
to improve pedestrian safety.
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local)
$100,000
$20,000
$334,000
$334,000
$434,000
$354,000
30. 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to
SR-104
Install sidewalk on one side of 232nd St. SW
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$850,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$130,000
$130,000
$720,000
$720,000
$0
$850,000
31 236th St. SW Walkway from SR-104 to
97th PI. W
Provide sidewalk on one side of 236th St. SW
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$910,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$135,000
$135,000
$775,000
$775,000
$0
$910,000
32 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to
234th St. SW
Provide sidewalk on one side of 84th Ave. W
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$395,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$75,000
$75,000
$320,000
$320,000
$0
$395,000
33. 2nd Ave. S Walkway from James St. to Main St.
Provide sidewalk along short missing link.
Local Funds Only
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State)
(Local)
$40,000
$0
$40,000
34. 218th St. SW Walkway
from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
Install sidewalk along missing link
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$795,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$120,000
$120,000
$675,000
$675,000
$0
$795,000
35. 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99
to 72nd Ave. W
Install 300' sidewalk on the north side of 216th St. SW
from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$150,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
Local
$150,000
$50,000
$0
$50,000
36. 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement
Walkway
Create corridor improvements to encourage pedestrian
activity along 4th Ave. N from Main St. to
3rd Ave. N (from Downtown retail to Edmonds Center for the Arts)
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$2,100,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local, various sources)
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$200,000
$250,000
$0
$1,150,000
37. ADA Curb Ramps Improvements
Construct Citywide ADA compliant curb ramps where
facilities don't exist nor meet current standards
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local, General Fund)
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,500,000
$0
38. SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -motorized
Transportation Improvements
Install ADA curb ramps, extend bike lanes,and complete signal
modifications in order to improve non -motorized
transportation safety. Traffic signal owned by Shoreline.
Possible Grant
&
Local Funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
(Local)
$200,000
$40,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$40,000
39. Pedestrian Safety Program
Complete pedestrian safety improvements at pedestrian crossings
such as RRFB's, Flashing LED's at stop signs, and signage.
Local funds
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State, unsecured)
Local, unidentified
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$0
$120,000
40. Downtown Lighting Improvements
Install additional street lights on both sides of
Dayton St. (cobra heads combined with pedestrian lights) and other
locations within proximity to Edmonds Transit Station.
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(Sound Transit, unsecured)
(Local)
$300,000
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
$0
41. SR-104 / Pine St Walkway: SR-104 from mid -block crossing
400' north of Pine St. to Pine St. and Pine St. from
SR-104 to 9th Ave. S
Complete sidewalk missing links to improve pedestrian safety
and connectivity to Edmonds Transit Station.
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(Sound Transit, unsecured)
(Local)
$250,000
$250,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$0
42. Citywide bicycle Improvements
Install bike lanes along 100th Ave.W / 9th Ave. W from 244th St. SW
to Walnut St. and along Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave. W to
84th Ave. W
Secured Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(Sound Transit, secured)
(Local)
$150,000
$1,500,000
$1,650,000
$0
TOTAL
$2,290,000
$3,070,000
$4,020,000
$4,174,000
$10,707,000
$6,049,000
Traffic Calming / Non -motorized Transportation Safety Projects:
43. Traffic Calming Program /
Non -Motorized Transportation
Safety
Traffic circles, speed cushions,
radar feedback signs, bulb -outs, etc.
Local Funds only
Engineering
&
Construction
$0
(Federal)
(State)
(Local, Unidentified)
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$0
$90,000
Ferry / Waterfront Projects
44. Ferry Storage Improvements from
Dayton St. to Pine St.
Provide additional ferry storage area closer to the Ferry Terminal
(through striping revisions / C-Curb addition...).
Possible Grant
Engineering
&
Construction
$357,000
(Federal, unsecured)
(State)
(Local)
$357,000
$0
$0
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$357,000
$0
$0
Traffic Planning Projects:
45. Citywide
ADA Transition Plan
Complete an compliance evaluation of all existing ADA
curb ramps, as well as long range plan on how to address
those defficiencies.
Local Funds Only
Engineering
&
Planning
$0
(Federal)
(State)
(Local, General Funds)
$150,000
$0
$150,000
46. Pavement Rating
Analyse the pavement condition of all arterial, collector,
$0
(Federal)
E
L
a,
0
L
a
a�
E
as
0
L
Q
E
c
0
:r
�a
0
a
c
0
L
as
X
in
W
N
O
N
N
0
N
a
N
O
N
N
0
N
c
0
E
�a
a
Page 3
Packet Pg. 154
8.2.a
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2021-2026)
Project Name
Purpose
Grant Opportunity
Project
Phase(s)
(2021-2026)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Study
and local streets to determine the stretches to be repaved
as part of future annual overlays.
Local Funds Only
Planning
$0
(State)
(Local / General Funds)
$30,000
$30,000
$0
47. Transportation Plan Update
Update Transportation Plan (current Plan was completed in 2015)
Local Funds Only
Engineering
&
Planning
$0
(Federal)
(State)
(Local)
$175,000
$0
$175,000
TOTAL
$0
$175,000
$180,000
$0
$0
$30,000
Total $89,899,000
Total Federal
Total Federal (Secured)
Total Federal (Unsecured)
Total State
Total State (Secured)
Total State (Unsecured)
Sound Transit (secured / unsecured
Total Local Fund
Total Local
(Fund 112)
Total Local
(Fund 125 / Fund 126L
Toal Local
(Fund 421)
Total Local
(Fund 422)
Total Local
(Fund 423)
Total Local
(Traffic Impact Fees)
Total Local
(General Fund)
Total Local
(unidentified)
$5,300,000
$11,355,000
$14,429,000
$17,436,500
$28,239,500
$13,264,000
$1,656,000
$2,891,000
$1,397,000
$5,675,500
$14,351,000
$5,959,000
$1,556,000
$891,000
$0
$44,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$2,000,000
$1,397,000
$5,631,500
$14,351,000
$5,959,000
$700,000
$2,110,000
$3,000,000
$1,272,000
$2,808,000
$3,500,000
$700,000
$2,110,000
$3,000,000
$0
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,272,000
$1,308,000
$500,000
$1,700,000
$4,650,000
$8,500,000
$6,000,000
$0
$0
$1,244,000
$1,704,000
$1,532,000
$4,396,000
$9,546,500
$3,805,000
$74,000
$249,000
$66,000
$751,000
$3,957,500
$1,470,000
$700,000
$990,000
$700,000
$700,000
$700,000
$700,000
$0
$0
$0
$75,000
$575,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$263,000
$1,359,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$676,000
$964,000
$0
$415,000
$410,000
$711,000
$356,000
$250,000
$30,000
$55,000
$55,000
$55,000
$1,525,000
$1,591,000
$1,605,000
a
Page 4
Packet Pg. 155
8.2.b
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2021-2026
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND
DIRECTING FILING OF THE ADOPTED PROGRAM WITH
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 and 36.81.121 require that each city and town is
required to adopt a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and file a copy of such adopted
program with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT); and
WHEREAS, the TIP identifies all planned projects over the next 6 years, along
with the appropriate funding source; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Transportation Improvement Program is hereby adopted pursuant
c
0
to the requirements of RCW 35.77.010 and 36.81.121 to be effective on July 29, 2020 and to
0
N
continue in full force and effect until amended. A copy of such Transportation Improvement
c
Program for the years 2021 to 2026 is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this
reference as fully as if herein set forth. a
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby requested and directed to file a certified copy
of the Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Department of
Transportation.
-1-
Packet Pg. 156
8.2.b
RESOLVED this day of , 2020.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
�. ... 0sm
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
-2-
Packet Pg. 157
4
Public Hearing
6-vear Transportation Improvement Program
(2021-2026 TIP)
July zest, 2020
Bertrand Hauss, PE
Transportation Engineer
;A l
>
0 0
Q
E
X
N
O
N
N
O
N
E
MEMOM
__ Packet Pg. 158
Outline
Introduction
I. Construction projects in 202O
II. Scheduled Construction projects (zoz1 / zozz)
111. Other projects identified in TIP
IV. Recently submitted grant applications /secured grants
Conclusion
01
a,
EI
0
O
CL
cu
LL
r
L
X_
U)
N
O
N
r
N
0
N
7
7
r-+
d
E
a
Packet Pg. 159
� Puget Sound Regional Council
VWashington State Department of Transportation
psrc,or
Introduction
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) requires that each
update their TIP by .July ist (however, delayed this year
COVID-19 and no public hearing could be scheduled un,
8.2.c
E
0
L
O
Q
R
LL
r
L
city
X
due to
N
it now) N
0
N
C
O
Document contains all significant transportation projects that a
City possibly plans to undertake in the next six years.
N
City of Edmonds policy: TIP financially constrained first (3) years y
E
Federal Grants, State Grants, and Local funds are programmed
as revenue source for TIP projects.
Packet Pg. 160
8.2.c
I. Construction Proiects in 2020
Annual Street Preservation Pro ram Project #� CL
g E
0
L
O
Q
Project Details
L
4 lane miles of variable depth overlay along local streets throughout
x
the City
N
O
(2)curb ramps upgrades (completed by City crews)
N
Schedule
May zozo through July zozo
Funding
* Local funds $1.2 Million
* Utility Funds $55,000
C
O
r
R
� O
d
N
_A
3
7
I r.a
hL
8.2.c
E:]
to Ave. W Overlay from zzoth St. SW to 212th St. SW
Project Description
2" overlay of 84th Ave. W from zzoth St. SW to 21 Zth St. SW
Curb ramp upgrades
s Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at
existing crosswalk near Chase Lake Elementary School
Stormwater upgrades
Schedule
Construction Completion completed (Summer 2020)
Funding
STP Grant
REET
Utility funds
$6901000
$156,000
$575,000
V
fC
a
Packet Pg. 162
Dayton St. Walkway from 7t" Ave. 5 to 8t" Ave. S
(Project #26 in 2020-2025 TIP)
8.2.c
- Project Description
• Complete missing sidewalk links (, 250' new sidewalk)
Curb ramp upgrades with bulb outs (Dayton St. @ 81" Ave. S) rd
• Incorporate into Dayton St. Utility Improvements project (from 3 Ave. S
9t" Ave. S)
• Priority Project #1 in Short Walkway List from 2015 Transportation Plan
- Schedule
- Construction Recently completed
- Funding
- Complete Streets Program (TIB) --- $185,000
E
O
L
0-
E
O
CL
cu
L
d
X_
U)
N
O
N
r
N
O
L
Y
r
N
7
7
r-+
C
d
E
L
V
R
a
Packet Pg. 163
8.2.c
Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd Ave S to 4t" Ave. S
' 2 2 2 2 2
(Protect It 5 in o o- 0 5 TIP)
E
0
L
- Project Description E
• Complete missing sidewalk links (N 150' new sidewalk) o
• Priority Project #3 in Short Walkway List from 2015 Transportation Plan
0
N
L
- Schedule i
- Construction Summer 2020 (to be completed by PW Concrete Crew) X
- Funding N
Complete Grant Streets Program (TIB) N $65,000 (100% GRANT funds r
N
O
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.�
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+
a+
L
�.
N
^-
p`. .�
we
Packet Pg. 164
8.2.c
Ad m i ra I Way Crosswalk
- Project Description
Install mid -block crosswalk along Admiral Way with RRFB's to
increase pedestrian safety
- Schedule
Construction
- Funding
- Port of Edmonds
- Local Funds
completed (early 2020)
$19,000
$19,000
Packet Pg. 165
O
Adaptive system along 220th St. SW
Project Descri tion
Traffic signs coordination along 2201" St. SW from I-5 off -ramp to
76t" Ave. W to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow along
busy Mountlake Terrace / Edmonds corridor (N 1 mile)
Schedule
Construction
• Funding
• HSIP (Federal Grant)
Summer / Fall 2020
$105,000 (90% grant -funded)
Packet Pg. 166
Citywide Signal Improvements
Y 9 p
(Project #4)
- Project Description
Install Flashing Yellow Arrow for EB and WB movements at SR-104
226t" St. SW to improve intersection delay and safety
- Schedule
Construction
- Funding
- Local Funds
Summer 2020
^' $10,000
Packet Pg. 167
II. Scheduled Constructi
n
2021
268.2.c
;!
E
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements (Project #23) Q
- Project Description
Complete Citywide pedestrian crossing enhancements at (9) locations, with
the following:
* Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at (7) intersections
* HAWK signal (SR-524 @a 84th Ave. W)
* Fully actuated traffic signal (SR-104 @a 232nd St. SW)
- Schedule
Design Spring 2o18 — July 2020
ROW Spring 2019 — April zozo
Construction Spring 2021 — Fall 2021
- Funding
Federal Grant (Safe Routes to School Program)
Local funds (approved as part of zoig Budget)
Utility funds
$1Y490,000
$4Z9,000
$50,000
L
O
CL
cu
L
X_
U)
N
O
N
N
O
�I
c
.o
M
r-
a
I N N
Packet Pg. 168
8.2.c
Citywide Bicycle
Improvements project
(Project #42)
Project Description
• Install bike lanes along key corridors
• 100t" Ave. W / 9th Ave. S from
238t" St. SW to Walnut St.;
• Bowdoin Way from 9t" Ave. S to
84t" Ave. W; and
• 228t" St. SW from 78t" Ave. to
80t" Ave. W.
Schedule
r' UE' UQ
"IE
:v: it 5i W,
1:2 ile
4nile y
Edmonds
Tftin s A Downtown rwr l,.rk
Cent:�r Edmonds �+lkli�P-1
• Design 2020 / 2021
• ROW (if needed) 2021
• Construction 2022
`c
Funding
• Sound Transit Access grant
• $1.85 MILLION (100% funds)
F
�rhh+!+•�n rr r.�
n
r_
0
_
Him.
5
1. I r.. .r4r.i-4
rrim�irlk,.
in
i
O�lob, H.S-.+:
O
y �.dwY
N
c
N
r7 97 en
O
Fmk
C
i+
fC
r
,sr��a _�
s b�
Westgate •'� rr.t. �
ixed Use 4 L
a
AlhWk FmH
U)
ikkmm
N
Poor
kadl9la 2d T 51 M
i
Firdale Village
�,,+p��
�r Mixed Use
2k_ ........
-. .
a
Packet Pg. 169
Downtown Lighting Improvements
(Project ##40
Project Description
Install Lighting Improvements within proximity to Sound Transit
Station (such as Dayton St from Admiral Way to SR-104.
Schedule
• Design 2021-2022
• Construction TBD
• Funding
• Sound Transit grant (as part of ST-3) $1.5 Million
8.2.c
Packet Pg. 170
IL. Other aroiects in 2021-2026 TIP
a. Corridor Improvements
2281h St. SW from Highway 99 to 95th Pl. W (Project #11)
SR-99 Revitalization (Initial project / Project #8)
SR-99 Revitalization / Gateway (Project #9)
b. Pavement Preservation
Annual Street Preservation (Project #1)
76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. (Project #2)
c. Signal Upgrades
Puget Dr. @ OVD (Project #5)
2381h St. SW @ 100th Ave. W (Project #6)
Main St. @ 3rd Ave. (Project # 7)
8.2.c
2021-2024
2020-2023
2024-2026
2021-2026
2021-2022
2024-2025
2024-2025
2025-2026
Packet Pg. 171
8.2.c
d. Intersection Improvements
76th Ave. W @ 2201h St. SW (Project #10)
196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W (Project #12)
Main St. @ 9th Ave. (Project #13)
SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W (Project #20)
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW (Project #21)
2021-2025
2024-2026
2024-2025
2024-2025
2024-2025
e. Active transportation projects
Sunset Ave. (Project #22)
* 4t" Ave. Corridor Enhancement Walkway (Project #36)
* SR-104 @a 76t" Ave. W Non -Motorized Transp. Impr. (Project #38)
SR-104 / Pine St. Sidewalk (Project #41)
Walkway projects within proximity to schools / parks
Maplewood Dr. Walkway (Project #25)
Elm Way Walkway (Project #26)
Sot" Ave. Walkway from 212nd St. SW to 2o6t" St. SW (Prof. #27)
8.2.c
2024-2025
2021-2025
2024-2025
2021-2023
2024- 2026
2025-2026
2024-2026
Sot" Ave. W Walkway from 188t" St to Olympic View Dr. (Prof. #28) 2024-2025
Packet Pg. 173
a.z.
III. Summary of recently submitted
transportation grants (since last TIP) d
0
Amount Total Project
Project Name
Grant Program
Phase
Request
Cost
Citywide Bicycle
Design /
Improvements
Sound Transit
Construction
$1,850,000
$1,850,000
SR-104 ITS System
CMAQ Federal
Design
$287,000
$2,174,000
Main St. Overlay from 6th to
Design /
8th
STP Federal
Construction
$750,000
$937,500
76th Ave. W @a 22oth St. SW
Intersection Improvements
STP Federal
ROW
$543,000
$8,000,000
Hwy 99 Revitalization from
22oth St. SW to 224th St. SW
STP Federal
Design
$2,248,000
$23,552,000
Hwy 99 (Raised Median)
HSIP
Construction
$2,000,000
$8,150,000
Not
Secured/
Secured / Final Spons
y
Tentative
TBD Respons(
c
LL
r
L
a�
Secured
November
.X
Fn
N
O
N
Tentative
December'
O
N
C
0
r
Tentative December 20
c
a�
a,
L
IL
Tentative December' N
N
Not
Secured December' r
c
E
TBD December'
a
17
Packet Pg. 174
8.2.c
Project Name
Downtown Lighting
228th St. SW Corridor
from Hwy 99 to 95th PI
W
Pine / SR-104 Walkway
236th St. SW Walkway
from Hwy 99 to 76th
Ave. W
Grant Program Phase
Design /
Sound Transit ST-3 Construction
Design /
Sound Transit ST-3 Construction
Design /
Sound Transit ST-3 Construction
Pedestrian and Design /
Bicycle Program Construction
Maplewood Dr. from Pedestrian and Design /
Main St. to tooth St. SW Bicycle Program Construction
Elm Way from 8th Ave. Safe Routes to Design /
to 9th Ave. School Program Construction
8oth Ave. W from 212th Safe Routes to Design /
St. SW to 216th St. SW School Program Construction
TOTAL
Not
Amount
Total Project
Secured/ Secured
Spongy
cw
Requested
Cost
Tentative / TBD
Respo
0
L
Q
E
$1,500,000
$1,5oo,000
Tentative
August
o
.2
r
L
0
$14,700,000
$14,70o,000
Tentative
August
L
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
Tentative
August
M
>
X
Un
N
O
$868,000
$1,737,000
TBD
July'
r
N
O
N
$1,073,000
$2,500,000
r-
0
TBD July' r
$637,000
$830,000
a
TBD July'
N
3
$1,519,000
$2,692,000
TBD July'
$- 1� ,011,000
$71F622,000
a
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT SECURED/ TENTATIVE = $22,630,000
Packet Pg. 175
8.2.c
Conclusion
Staff recommendation
* City Council approve TIP
Public Hearing / Questions ?
Packet Pg. 176
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Approval of Sound Transit Funding Agreement for Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project
Staff Lead: Bertrand Hauss
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On March 10, 2020, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee.
On July 21, 2020, public comment was received on the Sound Transit Funding Agreement for the
Citywide Bicylce Improvement Project.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the System Access Project Agreement.
Narrative
In 2019, a Sound Transit Access grant in the amount of $1.85 Million was secured for the Citywide
Bicycle Improvements project. The project will add bike lanes on both sides of the street along 1001h Ave
from 2441h Street to Walnut Street, Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 841h Ave, and 228th Street from 78th
Ave to 80th Ave. Sharrows will be added along 801h Ave from 228th Street to 220th Street (within
Snohomish County). The purpose of this agreement between the City of Edmonds and Sound Transit
establishes the terms and conditions for the eligible work during the duration of this agreement. The
agreement includes the scope of work, deliverables, funding plan, project schedule, reporting
requirements, and Sound Transit invoice forms.
The design phase is scheduled to begin in September 2020. Construction is anticipated to begin in Spring
2022, if the project does not require right-of-way acquisition (to be determined during the design
phase). Right-of-way acquisition (if needed) could delay the start of construction by up to one year
depending on the complexity and evaluation of the property acquisition.
Attachments:
Sound Transit Agreement
July 21st Presentation
Packet Pg. 177
8.3.a
SYSTEM ACCESS FUND PROJECT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND
REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR
CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
GA 0010-20
This Agreement, made and entered on , between the City of Edmonds
(hereinafter "City'), and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, (hereinafter "Sound
Transit");
WHEREAS, the Sound Transit 3 ("STY") high capacity transit system expansion plan was
approved by the voters in November 2016 and includes a $100 million System Access Program to
"fund such projects as safe sidewalks and protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus -
rail integration, and new pick-up and drop-off areas that provide convenient access so that more
people can use Sound Transit services;"
WHEREAS, Sound Transit opened the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects in February
2019 and subsequently evaluated applications from local governments against evaluation criteria
identified by the Sound Transit Executive Committee;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public comment period and online open house in August
2019, the Sound Transit Board of Directors approved 30 applications from 27 local governments
on September 26, 2019;
WHEREAS, Sound Transit and the City have a joint interest in delivering on citywide bicycle
improvements, (hereinafter the "Project), which was duly approved by the Sound Transit Board as
part of the System Access Program by virtue of M2019-97;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances
contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, it is mutually agreed as
follows:
1. GENERAL
1.1. Purpose. The intent of this Agreement is to establish the terms and conditions for the eligible
work to be performed for the Project during the duration of this Agreement. Attached hereto
as Exhibit A, is the Scope of Work and Deliverables, which outlines the activities, products
and general capital improvements eligible for fundingby Sound Transit, as presented to Sound
Transit in the City's application for Project funding. Funds may be expended on eligible
elements listed in Exhibit A up to the not to exceed amount outlined in Section 1.2 below.
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 1 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 178
1.2. Agreement Not -to -Exceed Amount. The total amount of the Agreement shall not exceed
$1,850,000.00. No payments will be made in excess of the established not -to -exceed amount
according to the Project Description outlined in Section 2.1 below.
The funding amount provided by Sound Transit does not include federal funding.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1. The Project will extend bicycle facilities along key east -west and north -south corridors and
provide an alternative mode of transportation for community members to reach both Edmonds
and Mountlake Terrance Transit Centers as identified in Exhibit A, Scope of Work and
Deliverables. Sound Transit funding will support two Phases:
2.1.1. Design Phase. The City will design the bicycle improvements. The Design Phase
is expected to require up to $500,000.00 of the total Not -to -Exceed amount noted in
Section 1.2. Any work in the Design Phase exceeding $500,000.00 must be approved
by Sound Transit. To be reimbursed for the Design Phase, the City must provide the
following: 1) Exhibit B, Project Funding Plan; 2) Exhibit C, Project Schedule, 3)
Exhibit D, Engineer's Estimate.
2.1.2. Construction Phase. The City will construct the Project. To be reimbursed for the
Construction Phase, the City must provide the following: 1) completed design plans
for Sound Transit review, 2) updated Exhibit B, Project Funding Plan; 3) updated
Exhibit C, Project Schedule; 4) Exhibit E, Environmental Review Certification; 5)
Exhibit F, ROW Certification; 6) updated Exhibit D, Engineer's Estimate
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1. Designated Representatives. The City and Sound Transit have designated formal points of
coordination for this Agreement. The Designated Representatives shall communicate
regularly to discuss the status of the tasks to be performed, to identify upcoming decisions
related to the Project, to provide any information or input necessary to inform those
decisions, and to resolve any issues or disputes related to the Project consistent with this
Agreement.
The Designated Representatives are:
CITY
SOUND TRANSIT
Alex Krieg
Deputy Director, Planning & Integration
401 S Jackson St
Seattle WA 98104
206-903-7663
Alex.Krieg@soundtransit.org
The Parties may change designated representatives by written notice to the other Parry during
the term of the Agreement.
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 2of18
Packet Pg. 179
8.3.a
3.2. Reporting Requirements. The City is required to submit Quarterly Progress Reportto Sound
Transit's Designated Representative to include the below elements (Exhibit G: Template for
Reporting Requirements). The report may include supporting documentation (photos, City
documentation, financial information, etc.).
3.2.1. Project Update. Status of major activities including, Phase 1-Design and Phase 2-
Construction, in the reporting period, both current and upcoming.
3.2.2. Assessment of on -going risks. The City will notify Sound Transit of any issues that
may affect the Project Schedule and overall implementation of the Project.
3.2.3. Project Funding. Summary of expenditures during reporting period, and expected
expenditures in the subsequent reporting period.
3.3. Eligible Costs. Eligible costs include actual costs identified in Exhibit A, Scope of Work and
Deliverables.
3.4. Additional Project Funding. The Not -to -Exceed funding amount in Paragraph 1.2 represents
approximately 100% of the total Project cost (assuming no need for right of way costs, which
the City will be responsible for). The City's Funding Plan is attached as Exhibit B.
3.5. Project Schedule. The parties agree to the project schedule identified in Exhibit C, Project
Schedule. The City shall complete all work and deliverables of the Project by one year after
the expected project completion date shown in Exhibit C, Project Schedule, unless otherwise
mutually agreed in writing by both Parties. The City is responsible fornotifying Sound Transit
of any material changes to the Project Schedule and rationale for the change in writing as part
of its quarterly reporting requirements.
3.6. City Work. The City is solely responsible for the environmental review, design, permitting
construction, project and construction management of all applicable Project elements
including, but not limited to, procurement and construction administration. The City is
responsible for all costs relating to the operations or maintenance of service and capital
improvements related to the Project upon its completion. The City will be the owner of the
completed Project. Sound Transit is not responsible for funding any service operations or for
maintenance of any improvements implemented under this Agreement.
3.7. Signage. Any identification signage that is used duringthe Project shall identify Sound Transit
as a funding partner.
3.8. Design Review. The City shall provide Sound Transit the opportunity to review design plans
at milestones identified in Exhibit C, Project Schedule.
3.9. Project Closeout. Before payment of the final invoice, the City and Sound Transit will meet
to ensure final deliverables are complete per Exhibit A, Scope of Work and Deliverables.
4. INVOICING
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 3 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 180
8.3.a
4.1. The City will submit quarterly invoices and supporting documentation that align with the
Scope of Work and Deliverables for payment (See Exhibit H, Invoice Form). The invoices
must include the Sound Transit purchase order number provided by Sound Transit.
4.2. The City will submit its invoices with the required documentation, in two .pdf files, via email
to accountspayable(d,soundtransit.or (and carbon copying Sound Transit's Designated
Representative). Invoices will be paid within (30) days of Sound Transit's receipt of the
invoice and acceptable and complete supporting documentation.
4.3. The City agrees to submit a final invoice to Sound Transit within forty-five (45) days after the
City has completed each phase of the work.
4.4. If Sound Transit determines that an invoice lacks sufficient documentation to support
payment, Sound Transit will notify the City of its determination and request that the City
provide additional documentation. Sound Transit may withhold payment of the invoice until
supporting documentation is provided, however such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
5. TERM, SUSPENSION, AND TERMINATION
5.1. Term. This Agreement shall take effect upon the last date of signature by the Parties as set
forth below. This Agreement shall remain in effect until 180 days following Project
completion, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties, superseded by a
future agreement, or suspended or terminated in accordance with this Section 5.
5.2. Termination by Sound Transit. Sound Transit may terminate this Agreement under the
following circumstances:
5.2.1. If work as defined in Exhibit A is not completed by one year afterthe expectedproject
completion date shown in Exhibit C, Project Schedule, unless otherwise agreed to by
the Parties.
5.2.2. If the City fails to make progress towards completing the Project and the City has not
provided adequate assurances of its desire or ability to complete the Project and
commence operations.
If the Agreement is terminated under this Section 5.2, the City shall reimburse Sound Transit
the full amount of all payments it made to the City under this Agreement within 90 days of
the date of termination. The City may ask for an extension of time to complete the Project for
good cause. Sound Transit's agreement to extend the completion will not be unreasonably
withheld.
5.3. Termination by Either Party. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for cause in the event
that the other Party fails to fulfill its material obligations under this Agreement in a timely
manner or breaches any material provision of this Agreement and the Dispute Resolution
Process has failed to reach resolution within the timelines described therein. The Party wishing
to terminate this Agreement for cause will provide the other Party with notice of its intent to
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 4 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 181
8.3.a
terminate and will give the other Party an opportunity to correct the failure to perform or
breach within thirty (30) days of the notice or within such longer period as may be necessary
in the event that correction cannot reasonably be accomplished within thirty (30) days. If the
failure orbreach is not corrected or cured, this Agreementmay be terminated by the aggrieved
Party by giving ninety (90) days' notice to the other Party.
5.4. Except as provided in this Section, a termination by either Party will not extinguish or release
either Party from liability for costs or obligations existing as of the date of termination. Any
costs incurred prior to proper notification of termination will be borne by the Parties in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
6. INDEMNITY
6.1. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the City will hold harmless from, and indemnify
and defend Sound Transit (including its board members, officers, directors and employees)
(the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, lawsuits,
actions, or liability of any kind or nature, arising out of or relating to the City's design,
construction, maintenance or operation of the Project, including claims by the City's
employees. THE CITY SPECIFICALLY ASSUMES POTENTIAL LIABILITY FOR
ACTIONS BROUGHT BY THE CITY'S OWN EMPLOYEES OR FORMER
EMPLOYEES AGAINST ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY, AND FOR THAT PURPOSE
THE CITY SPECIFICALLY WAIVES ALL IMMUNITY AND LIMITATIONS ON
LIABILITY UNDER THE WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT, RCW TITLE 51, OR
ANY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE ACT, DISABILITY BENEFIT ACT OR OTHER
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ACT OF ANY JURISDICTION THAT WOULD
OTHERWISE BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF SUCH CLAIM. THIS
INDEMNITY OBLIGATION SHALL NOT BE LIMITED BY ANY LIMITATION ON
THE AMOUNT OR TYPE OF DAMAGES, COMPENSATION OR BENEFITS
PAYABLE BY OR FOR THE CITY OR A CONTRACTOR UNDER WORKERS'
COMPENSATION, DISABILITY BENEFIT OR OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
LAWS. THE CITY RECOGNIZES THAT THIS WAIVER WAS SPECIFICALLY
ENTERED INTO AND WAS THE SUBJECT OF MUTUAL NEGOTIATION.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THE CITY'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH EXTENDS ONLY TO CLAIMS AGAINST
THE CITY BY SOUND TRANSIT, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE, OR EXTEND TO,
ANY CLAIMS BY THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE(S) DIRECTLY AGAINST THE CITY.
The foregoing indemnity applies only to the extent of the City's negligence.
6.2. The City further agrees to assume the defense of the Indemnified Parties with legal counsel
acceptable to Sound Transit, whose acceptance shall notbe unreasonably withheld. In all legal
or claim proceedings arising out of, in connection with, or incidental to the City's work or that
of its contractors, subcontractors of any tier, suppliers, consultants and sub -consultants. The
City shall pay all defense expenses, including attorney's fees, expert fees, and costs incurred
directly or indirectly on account of such litigation or claims, and shall satisfy any judgment
rendered in connection therewith. The City may settle any suit, claim, action cost, loss penalty
or damages, subject to the approval of Sound Transit, whose approval shall not be
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 5 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 182
8.3.a
unreasonably withheld, if such settlement completely and forever extinguishes any and all
liability of the Indemnified Parties. In the event of litigation between the Parties hereto to
enforce the rights under this provision, reasonable attorney fees shall be allowed to the
prevailing party.
6.3. Each Parry agrees to bear full responsibility for any and all tax liabilities owed that may arise
in relation to this Agreement, and each Parry will fully indemnify and hold the other Parry, its
officers, agents and employees harmless from any tax liability owed by the other Party arising
from or related to the transactions set forth herein, including, but not limited to, any taxes,
penalties, fines, and/or interest that are assessed by any tax authority against the indemnifying
Party and further including all attorneys' fees and costs incurred in response to any claims or
assessments by any tax authority against indemnifying Parry, its officers, agents and
employees.
6.4. The obligations in this Section will survive termination or completion of this Agreement as to
any claim, loss or liability arising from events occurring prior to such termination or
completion.
7. AUDITS
7.1. Each Parry will maintain accounts and records, including contract and financial records that
sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended for work
performed under this Agreement so as to ensure proper accounting for all monies paid to the
City by Sound Transit. These records will be maintained for a period of six (6) years after
termination orexpiration of this Agreement unless permissionto destroy the records is granted
by the Office of the Archivist pursuant to RCW Chapter 40.14 and agreed to by the Parties.
7.2. The City will make all Project records available for Sound Transit inspection upon prior
reasonable request. Audits may be performed by Sound Transit or its independent public
accountants to ensure compliance with and enforcement of this Agreement. Should the audit
determine that funds from Sound Transit have been used for expenses that were ineligible,
then Sound Transit shall provide a copy of the auditor's determination to the City. The City
agrees with the determination, then the City will reimburse Sound Transit the amounts found
to have been ineligible. If the City disputes the auditor's determination, then the matter shall
be referred to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 9.
8. INSURANCE
8.1. Coverage. During the construction phase of any eligible elements within the Project, the
City shall provide primary insurance coverage in the amounts that it deems necessary for
construction projects of similar size and cost. If the City is self -insured, it shall provide to
Sound Transit's risk manager a certificate of self-insurance. The City shall require their
contractor(s) and sub -contractors to obtain and maintain insurance in amounts and types
suitable to protect Sound Transit and the City from exposures presented by the work
performed under this Agreement. The minimum insurance requirements during the entire
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 6 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 183
8.3.a
term of this Agreement are set forth below:
a) Commercial General Liability in the amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) each
occurrence limit, two million dollars ($2,000,000) general aggregate limit, covering bodily
injury including death, personal injury, property damage, Employers' Liability and
contractual coverage endorsements, and utilize insurers and coverage forms acceptable to
Sound Transit.
b) Commercial Auto Liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage utilizing
insurers and coverage forms acceptable to Sound Transit, with a limit of at least one million
dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
c) Worker's Compensation insurance coverage, where applicable, shall comply with State of
Washington Labor and Industries requirements.
d) Builders Risk coverage will be the responsibility of all contractors and subcontractors.
e) Pollution Liability (if there is any potential environmental liability exposure) in the
amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and two million dollars
($2,000,000) aggregate.
f) Professional Liability (if there is a potential professional liability exposure) in the amount
of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim.
8.2. Certificates. Certificates of insurance must name Sound Transit as an "Additional Insured,"
and shall reference the number and title of this Agreement. All insurance coverage obtained
by the City or its contractors and subcontractors must name Sound Transit, its officers and
employees as "additional insureds" and contain "severability of interest" (cross liability)
provisions. The City's and the contractor's insurance policies shall be primary to and not
contributing with any insurance or self-insurance that may be carried by Sound Transit and
waive their right of Subrogation against Sound Transit. Certificates of Insurance, including
the Additional Insured Endorsements, Waiver of Subrogation Endorsements and Primary
and Non -Contributory Endorsements, will be provided to Sound Transit before the start of
any work performed under this Agreement.
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
9.1. Any disputes or questions of interpretation of this Agreement or the performance of either
Party under this Agreement that may arise between Sound Transit and the City shall be
governed under the dispute resolution provisions in this Section 9. The Parties agree that
neither Party may take or join any action in any judicial or administrative forum to challenge
the other Party's performance under this Agreement until the dispute resolution process in this
Section 9 has been exhausted.
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 7 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 184
9.2. The Parties agree that cooperation and communication are essential to resolving issues
efficiently. The Parties agree to use their best efforts to prevent and resolve potential sources
of conflict at the lowest level possible.
9.3. Either Party may refer a dispute to the dispute resolution process by providing written notice
of such referral to the other Party's Designated Representative. The Parties agree to use their
best efforts to resolve disputes arising out of or related to this Agreement using good faith
negotiations by engaging in the following dispute resolution process should any such disputes
arise:
a. Level One - Sound Transit's Designated Representative and the City's Designated
Representative shall meet to discuss and attempt to resolve the dispute in a timely
manner. If they cannot resolve the dispute within fourteen (14) days after referral of
that dispute to Level One, either parry may refer the dispute to Level Two.
b. Level Two - Sound Transit's Deputy Executive Director of the Office of Planning &
Integration and the City's Departmental Leads shall meet to discuss and attempt to
resolve the dispute in a timely manner. If they cannot resolve the dispute within
fourteen (14) days after referral of that dispute to Level Two, either Party may refer
the dispute to Level Three.
Level Three - Sound Transit's Executive Director of the Planning, Environment, and
Project Development Department or Designee and the City's Department Directors
or Designee shall meet to discuss and attempt to resolve the dispute in a timely
manner.
9.4. In the event the dispute is not resolved at Level Three within fourteen (14) days after referral
of that dispute to Level Three, the Parties are free to file suit, seek any available legal remedy,
or agree to alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation. At all times prior to
resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall continue to perform any undisputed obligations and
make any undisputed required payments under this Agreement in the same manner and under
the same terms as existed prior to the dispute. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to
the contrary, neither Party has any obligation to participate in mediation or any other form of
alternative dispute resolution following completion of Level Three of the process described
herein. A Party may decline to participate in such proceeding for any reason or no reason.
10. LEGAL PROVISIONS
10.1. Warranties. By execution of this Agreement, both Parties warrant that they have the full
right and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, and that by entering into or
performing this Agreement, they are not in violation of any law, regulation, or agreement;
and that the execution, delivery andperformance ofthe Agreement has been duly authorized
by all requisite corporate action, and that the signatories hereto, which have signed on each
Parties behalf, are authorized to sign this Agreement.
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 8 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 185
8.3.a
10.2. No waiver. Neither Party will be relieved of its obligations to comply promptly with any
provision of this Agreement by reason of any failure by the other Party to enforce prompt
compliance, and such failure to enforce will not constitute a waiver of rights or acquiescence
in the other Parry's conduct.
10.3. Costs. Each Party will be responsible for its own costs, including legal fees, incurred in
negotiating or finalizing this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties.
If either Party brings any claim or lawsuit arising from this Agreement, each Party will pay
all its legal costs and attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending or bringing such
claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided
by law; however, nothing in this paragraph will be construed to limit the Parties' rights to
indemnification.
10.4. Public Records. Each Party shall be responsible for its own public records and public
records requests.
10.5. Notices. All notices required under this Agreement must be in writing and addressed to the
Designated Representative. All notices must be either: (i) delivered in person, (ii) deposited
postage prepaid in the certified mails of the United States, return receipt requested, (iii)
delivered by a nationally recognized overnight or same -day courier service that obtains
receipts, or (iv) delivered electronically to the other Party's Designated Representative.
However, notice under Section 5, termination, must be delivered in person or by certified
mail, return receipt requested.
10.6. The parties may not unreasonably withhold requests for information, approvals or consents
provided for in this Agreement; provided, however, that approvals or consents required to
be given by vote of the Sound Transit Board or the City Board are recognized to be
legislative actions. The parties will take further actions and execute further documents,
either jointly or within their respective powers and authority, to implement the intent of this
Agreement. The City and Sound Transit will work cooperatively with each other to achieve
the mutually agreeable goals as set forth in this Agreement.
10.7. Time is of the essence in every provision of this Agreement. Unless otherwise set forth in
this Agreement, the reference to "days" shall mean calendar days unless otherwise noted.
Any reference to "working days" shall exclude any legal holidays and weekend days. If any
time for action occurs on a weekend or legal holiday, then the time period shall be extended
automatically to the next business day.
10.8. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees,
agents or subcontractors of one Party shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be,
employees of any other Party.
10.9. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both Parties and no
presumption or rule that ambiguity shall be construed against the Party drafting the
System Access FundProject Agreement Page 9 of 18
GA 0010-20
Packet Pg. 186
8.3.a
document applies to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. The Parties intend
this Agreement to be interpreted to the full extent authorized by applicable law.
10.10.This Agreement maybe executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, and all counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
10.11. Severability. In case any term of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
in whole or in part, by a court of law, the Parties will reform the agreement to satisfy the
original intent of the Parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Agreement by having its
authorized representative affix her/his name in the appropriate space below:
SOUND TRANSIT CITY
By:
Kimberly Farley, Deputy CEO
Date:
LIN
Date:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
By:
Sound Transit Legal Counsel
Exhibit List:
Exhibit A: Scope of Work and Deliverables
Exhibit B: Project Funding Plan
Exhibit C: Project Schedule
Exhibit D: Engineer's Estimate
Exhibit E: Environmental Review Certification
Exhibit F: ROW Certification
Exhibit G: Template for Reporting Requirements
Exhibit H: Invoice Form
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
By:
City of Edmonds Legal Counsel
Pagel 0of18
Packet Pg. 187
8.3.a
Exhibit A: Scope of Work and Deliverables
Scope ofwork
• The project consists in the installation of bike lanes on both sides of the street along
the following stretches:
o l OOth St. SW / 9th Ave. S from Walnut St. to 244th St. SW;
o Bowdoin Way from 91h Ave. S to 84th Ave. W;
0 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 78th Ave. W; and
o Sharrows along 80th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to 220th St. SW.
Deliverables
• Design Phase
o Submittal of Quarterly Reports and Invoices
o PS&E Submittals
■ 30% PS&E;
■ 90% PS&E; and
■ Final PS&E.
o Environmental Documentation (SEPA)
• Construction Phase
o Submittal of Quarterly Reports and Invoices
o Construction Contract Closeout documents
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 11 of 18
Packet Pg. 188
8.3.a
Exhibit B: Project Funding Plan
The project will be 100% funded by the $1.85 Million secured Sound Transit System Access
grant. Based on the preliminary engineer's estimate, the Sound Transit funds will be expended as
follows:
• Design Phase $350,000
• Construction Phase $1.5 Million
* * * The City doesn't anticipate any ROW costs for this project but ROW needs will be
confirmed during the completion of the Design Phase. If ROW acquisition is needed, the City
will be responsible for covering 100% of those costs.
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 12of18
Packet Pg. 189
8.3.a
Exhibit C: Project Schedule
Option]: Project with no ROW acquisition
Design Phase
• Start September 2020
• 30%PS&E February 2021
• 90% PS&E July 2021
• Final PS&E December 2021
Construction Phase
• Advertisement January 2022
• Start April 2022
• Completion /Project Closeout December 2022
Option 2: Project with ROW acquisition
Design Phase
• Start
September 2020
• 30% PS&E
February 2021
• 90% PS&E
October 2021
• Final PS&E
February 2022
ROW Phase
• Start February 2021
• Negotiations with property owners April 2021
• Completion February 2022
Construction Phase
• Advertisement March 2022
• Start May 2022
• Completion /Project Closeout December 2022
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 13of18
Packet Pg. 190
8.3.a
Exhibit D: Engineer's Estimate
Preliminary Cast Ewmate
Item
auarWry
unit
Ll—j hAm
Halt Game
Casa
I
1
YS
Surww
S2 OM
$2 OW
2
1
L5
Mobiliurian
$4olow
$.10,0w
3
1
L5
Traffic COnV01
$75,W0
$75,0w
A
1
LS
OK -Du Pulicc olfdei
smow
$Y Cw
5
1
L5
IL5'
szwo
$2xw
6
1
LS
54R—rur.Libn
$5,DDD
$.5Xw
7
LS
Removal of str luie erid pbsVuctiami
$ioxu
$1 006
a
25,000
1F
Hen— existing uripiq;
$6
$150.bOb
9
6Q,Qo0
LF
5uli: lirs•stripir•
$2
ID
1
MR
Sin Ibikr lone s' •fie rl
smow
Ularaw
11
6o
Um
-lik_1e—r I--ir,.,ki.g
$250
$Y5,006
IY
1
LS
Sw—water line Pyre yes f rdocaklnn
$73Aw
$100,00D
13
415
Wiik
—kch basin'rerne and ate
$2,5m
$115,OOD
14
1
LS
{{prb Mr irlutian
$1Q,om
$14,800
15
1
Ls
TrdRe S�nal MeM rellensi+rtlr.d.Lg pule ±-binr.
m diti-Liuni
$285,DQfl
$285,600
16
225
Ten
XMA
W113
$22,508
17
SG:
Tan
(SBC
$AO
S.40DO
3B
1
LS
Minar [h—ghs
smow
$Y0,000
14
3
L
ADA Pedesarian Curb Raney
$75G6
$22,500
5u6iatal
$1,02ko00
Design Cr timpmer (25%�
$25615m
I nilariun r3%j i iyear
$30,a00
LbnfrrvcfkM 5UB-7ilreLL
j]jI3.34b
city su ll 1.5%1
$15,390
Mengyrinern Rrer}e I1Q%I
$102,500
Cdnsiry lion Cngineering 110761
$1P2,500
roYAL
3,9.90
Iles; 159fi $146,99s
C pM (1.5%1 j19,7Q0
P—mllii S f5%I $65y65
7ataY aFsrG,V
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
7or1i! soon D rRAnlsiT RFQuFsr I $1,8.501WO
ROW cc& $200,000
TOTAL PMECT COSTS Sz. o o.uuu
Page 14of18
Packet Pg. 191
Exhibit E: Environmental Review Certification
8.3.a
The City of , as lead agency for purposes of the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA), hereby certifies that the proposal described herein has undergone environmental review in
accordance with all applicable SEPA rules pursuant to Chapter 197-11 Washington Administrative Code.
The City of has completed the following project -level environmental review
documentation and submitted to Sound Transit for review:
❑Letter of exemption from SEPA pursuant to WAC 197-11-800
❑SEPA Environmental Checklist/Determination of Non -significance (DNS) or Mitigated DNS
❑Environmental Impact Statement
❑SEPA Addendum
❑Other:
Signature of Authorized Local Government SEPA Responsible Official
Sound Transit's office of Environmental Affairs and Sustainability has reviewed the provided documents
checked above and authorizes the following:
❑Payment for construction (Design and Construction Agreements)
❑Environmental approval to execute agreement for construction of project (Construction Only
Agreement)
Signature of Corridor Environmental Manager
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 15of18
Packet Pg. 192
8.3.a
Exhibit F: ROW Certification
The City to provide ROW Certification
System Access FundProj ect Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 16 of 18
Packet Pg. 193
8.3.a
Exhibit G: Template for Reporting Requirements
CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
PROJECT REPORT
GA0010-20
Reporting Period:
Submitted
1. Project Update. Status of major activities in the reporting period, both current and upcoming.
2. Assessment of on -going risks. The City will notify Sound Transit of any issues that may affect
the Project Schedule and overall implementation of the Project.
3. Summary of expenditures during reporting period. Summary of expenditures during
reporting period, and expected expenditures in the subsequent reporting period.
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 17of18
Packet Pg. 194
8.3.a
Exhibit H: Sound Transit Invoice Form
Invoice No. Dated:
TO: accountspayable(a,soundtransit.or
Attention: Accounts Payable and Alex Krieg
Re: Citywide Bicycle Improvements, System Access Fund Project, GA 0010-20
The City's authorized representative certifies that Sound Transit's pro rata share of costs under
this invoice is $ , and is due and payable to the City in accordance with the provisions of
the Agreement, and is supported by the attached invoice and supporting documentation. [Identify
the elements(s), and the amounts by element, for which the amount due applies]
The City makes the following representations and warranties to Sound Transit in connection with
the Invoice:
• All work performed to date has been, unless otherwise specifically stated by the City,
performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
• The amount specified above has been computedin accordance with, and is due and payable
under, the terms and conditions of the Agreement, has not been the subject of any previous
invoice (unless disputed or rejected for payment) and is not the subject of any pending
invoice from the City.
Any liability of Sound Transit arising from these representations and warranties are governed by
the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
City of Edmonds
Date:
[Name, Position]
System Access FundProject Agreement
GA 0010-20
Page 18of18
Packet Pg. 195
8.3.b
SOUND TRANSIT AGREEMENT
(CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT)
JULY 21 ST, 2020 COUNCIL
Packet Pg. 196
8.3.b
AGENDA
INTRODUCTION
• PROJECT DESCRIPTION /MAP
• EXISTING / PROPOSED CROSS SECTION
• ACCIDENT DATA
• PARKING STUDY
• BIKE COUNT
• SCHEDULE
• SUPPORT FROM OTHER AGENCIES
CONCLUSION /PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 197
8.3.b
r
c
a
E
a
0
L
Q
u
INTRODUCTION
m
3
2017: EDMONDS, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, AND LYNNWOOD ADDED BIKE LANES THROUGHOUT THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (THROUGH BIKE-2-HEALTH GRANT) WITH FOCUS ON NORTH / CENTRAL PART OF
EDMONDS —> 7 MILES OF BIKE LANES IN EDMONDS).
L
2019: SOUND TRANSIT HAD A CALL FOR PROJECTS WITH THE INTENT TO IMPROVE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION a
ACCESS TO SOUND TRANSIT STATIONS (FOR OUR PURPOSES: MLT TRANSIT STATION & EDMONDS STATION)
CITY SECURED $1.85 MILLION IN GRANT FUNDING (100% SOUND TRANSIT ACCESS GRANT / NO LOCAL MAT u- 1)
ALL STRETCHES IDENTIFIED IN 2015 TRANSPORTATION PLAN (ADOPTED BY COUNCIL IN 2015)
PROPOSED BIKE IMPROVEMENTS WITH FOCUS ON SOUTH SIDE / CENTRAL PART OF EDMONDS o
• 1 OOT" AVE. W / 9T" AVE. N; 0
s
ev
.r
• BOWDOIN WAY; N
• 228T" ST. SW SW; AND a
• 80T" AVE. W. N
c
d
E
s
r
Q
Packet Pg. 198
8.3.b
CITYWIDE
BICYCLE
IMPROVEMENTS
KEY
Proposed Shariows
Proposed Bike Lane
r r. . Existing Sharrows
1118116, Existing Bike Lane
'-sees, Existing Bike Path
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a
1 mile .
LASI €RS 5T
1 /2 mile -
1 /4 mile
Edmonds m+
' m+ MAIN ST
' Transit
' downtown I ro*P„k
I
Cent==r Edmonds ALNUT S �PO°�
\ w i
a
290TH ST 5w
� t
..rrralr a no r rib
MR
_ moods
- Community
�I
Cdlepe
Pork y ��
3n .1.j 1,
ON ,
12TH 5;
rSw
�anrn.an l..>ra rnn.
Edmonds
_7
Wood..ay�
¢ Chase Lake
Be—ntry
w�-
,1 mile
- �
Sher..00d ���� 228 TH y
/� mile �-
Westgate alAlarra yw 228TH ST SW
HemeMary :
fixed Use ��� ., :�1 1/4lhile `
Wood—y
Athletic Field
Hickm
o Pork
Mountlake
-! :A I
i 135TH PL Terrace + ��
SM'
huuuara..
N'ad ronn %RTH51 SW .� ' \ Transit , �••�
K 8 .• 1 \
- 1
Malhay-BOl�lh er - \ `, Center '
Firdale Village pork e -
Mixed Use"
244TH ST SN
El
Packet Pg. 199
8.3.b
Proposed Sharrows
Proposed Bike Lane
Existing Sharrows
Existing Bike Lane
Existing Bike Path
i I MAIN ST
' I
Downtown I Yost Park
I Edmonds W NU and Pool
i
C �
i
i
111111111111114
Westgate
Elementry
a
S
1„
W AY
Alld�
3r111■
00011111■r■1111118
11jTH rr1E
Edmonds 3-.
!C
WoodwayL"'
Q.
Q Chase Lake H.S. �=
1-
Elementry nr
c
m
228T-
Sherwood Westgate 11i11111A
Elementary
fixed Use ,
V�. .r
wood -way
. .
. .r
Athletic Field `
. .I
�I
Hickman l
Park Madrona 238TH ST SW •
K-8• t
AO t
0 F i r d a l e Village Ma10
ti�ay-Ballinger
• t�" Park
•••:;F Mixe-
A , pSs vv
To existing bike lanes in Shorel'ine
1
Packet Pg. 200
8.3.b
CRO55 SECTIONS
100th Ave. W from 238th St. SW to north of SR-104
EXIST EXISTING CURB
R.O.W.
2.5
EXISTING EXISTING
SIDEWALK TRAVELLANE
30,0'
L EXISTING
PAVEMENT
11.0'
EXISTING
TRAVELLANE
- 11.0' -
EXISTING
TRAVELLANE
Two Travel lanes in both directions
q
EXISTING SECTION
. i -
EXISTING EXISTING
TRAVELLANE SIDEWALK
30 Y
J
Packet Pg. 201
8.3.b
I V 5 0'
EXISTING
EXIST EXISTINGCURB PAVEMENT EXIST
R.O.W. R.D w
xs' s.s 13V �� tts io.o' ii.a ssr 551 xs
EXISTING BIKE TRAVELLANE TWO-WAY TRAVELLANE BIKE EXISTING
SIDEWALK LANE LEFT TURN LANE LANE SIDEWALK
30.0' 3♦1.0'
L
.-i
_
O
STRIPING -ONLY SECTION
PROPOSED SECTION a
0
Road diet (one lane in each direction with two-way left turn lane and bike lanes) 4
*Sections within signalized intersections (such as SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W) to be re-evaluated during design phase
E
E
s
r
Q
Packet Pg. 202
8.3.b
EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH
(2) TRAVEL LANES IN EACH DIRECTION
al
Packet Pg. 203
8.3.b
.0
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
WITH TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE AND BIKE L
ANES
Packet Pg. 204
8.3.b
RESULTS FROM RECENT /SIMILAR CONVERSION
ALONG 76THAVE, W FROM 220rH rO 2 1 2rH
• AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)
• 76T" AVE: 1 1,500 VEHICLES PER DAY
• 1 OOT" AVE. W (SOUTH OF SR-104): 9,000 VEHICLES PER DAY
• 1 OOT" AVE. W (NORTH OF SR-104): 5,000 VEHICLES PER DAY
• SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FOR ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
• BIKE LANES (CYCLIST WITH OWN FACILITY)
• VEHICLE SPEED REDUCTIONS (TRAFFIC CALMING) WITH MORE CONSISTENT PACE (SPEEDING ON-
GOING ISSUES ALONG 1 OOT" AVE .W);
• SAFER CORRIDOR DUE TO REDUCTION OF LANE CHANGES WHEN GOING AROUND LEFT TURN
VEHICLES:
• NO INCREASE IN TRAVEL TIME;
• PEDESTRIANS IMPROVEMENTS => BIKE LANES PROVIDE SEPARATION BETWEEN VEHI
PEDESTRIANS; AND
• SUPPORTS COMPLETE STREETS.
Packet Pg. 205
8.3.b
Ex. Cross Section along
100t" from SR-104 to Walnut St & Bowdoin Way from 100t" to 84tn
EXIST �E%ISTING CURB E1fISTNG EXIS7
R.O.W. R4T R O.W.
2S 5.5' 80' T tItl I1 Y SIC,-
E%ISTING E%1STING EXISTING EX
E%ISTIIw E%1STING
SIDEWALK PARKING TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PARKING SIDEWALK
300
300
Packet Pg. 206
8.3.b
PROPOSED CONDITIONS ALONG 100r" AND BOWDOIN WAY
E%i$TIHG CURB PAVE4ENT
ROW ROW
27' EL �'L�—B-KoE
no ,s ib'
E7cI7T1N0 BN(E ?RAVEL LATE TRAVEL LANE LAN PASkING LANE E%IEWAL
s�vwuc LANE II LANE soEv+ALK
90V T ]0a
Prop. Conditions with bike lanes on both sides of street / parking
on one side (parking alternating from one side of street to other)
Packet Pg. 207
8.3.b
lor
Google
Proposed conditions with one travel lane
in each direction, atwo-way left turn lane and
bike lanes on both sides (with very low parking demand)
Packet Pg. 208
8.3.b
r
c
a�
E
a�
0
L
Q
u
BIKE ACCIDENT SUMMARY
(PRE POST BIKE-2-HEALTH PROJECT)co
3
U
L
O
• (8) MINOR INJURY CYCLIST COLLISIONS BETWEEN 2012 — 2017 (PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF BIKE-2-HEALTH
PROJECT)
L
• (2) ALONG 21 2T" ST. SW BETWEEN 72ND AVE. W AND 84T" AVE. W & a
• (6) ALONG 76T" AVE. W BETWEEN 220T" ST. SW AND OVD
• CYCLISTS HIT BY VEHICLE WHILE RIDING ON SIDEWALK => DUE TO LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE WITH FENCES / VEGETATION L
• CYCLIST IMPACT WITH OPEN DOOR OF PARKED CAR
L
• CYCLIST GOING THROUGH HIT TURNING VEHICLE
c
0
co
• (0) MINOR INJURY CYCLIST COLLISIONS BETWEEN 2017 — 2019 (SINCE COMPLETION OF BIKE-2-HEALTH PROJE 0
• WITH INCREASE IN CYCLIST ACTIVITY ALONG THOSE STREETS
L
a.
T
N
7
C
d
E
s
0
r
Q
Packet Pg. 209
8.3.b
BIKE ACCIDENTS ALONG PROPOSED STRETCHES
BETWEEN 2015 AND 2019
• (4) BIKE COLLISIONS ALONG 1 OOT" AVE. W STRETCH & (1) ALONG
228T" ST. SW STRETCH
• CYCLISTS HIT WHILE RIDING IN SIDEWALK DUE TO LIMITED SIGHT
DISTANCE
• CYCLISTS HIT WHILE GOING THROUGH BY TURNING VEHICLE
Packet Pg. 210
8.3.b
PARKING STUDY
ALONG 100T" ST SW
• 100T" AVE. S STRETCH (1.2 MILE)
• PARKED CARS ON EAST SIDE OF STREET
• 3 (WEEKDAY EARLY MORNING)
• b (WEEKDAY MID -AFTERNOON)
• b (WEEKEND MORNING)
• PARKED CARS ON WEST SIDE OF STREET
• 7 (WEEKDAY EARLY MORNING)
• 9 (WEEKDAY MID -AFTERNOON)
• b (WEEKEND MORNING)
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
Packet Pg. 211
8.3.b
PARKING STUDY
ALONG BOWDOIN WAY
• BOWDOIN WAY STRETCH (I. I MILE)
• PARKED CARS ON NORTH SIDE OF STREE)
• 12 (WEEKDAY EARLY MORNING)
• 16 (WEEKDAY MID -AFTERNOON)
• 10 (WEEKEND MORNING)
• PARKED CARS ON SOUTH SIDE OF STREET
• 5 (WEEKDAY EARLY MORNING)
• 4 (WEEKDAY MID -AFTERNOON)
• 7 (WEEKEND MORNING)
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=> LESS THAN 5%
=>LESS THAN 5%
u
Packet Pg. 212
8.3.b
BIKE COUNTS INFORMATION (BASED ON VIDEO
COUNTS COMPLETED BY IDAX/ KPG)
■ April 2016
■ April 2019
0 76th Ave W & Olympic View Dr
O 9th Ave S & Walnut St
0 76th Ave W & 212th St SW
Total Bike Count Data
■August 2016
■July 2019
■ June 2017 ■ October 2017
■ September 2019 ■ Decem ber 2019
0 50 10C 50 200 250 300 350 400
0
• Based on pre -post bike lane installation studies (cities of various sizes), the increase in bike COD
N
activity has ranged from 50% to 400%
• Seattle: generated 400% increase in bike activity following addition of bike lanes alon6
various corridors several years ago
E
s
r
Q
Packet Pg. 213
8.3.b
PROJECT SCHEDULE
• DESIGN PHASE
• CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
• START DESIGN
• COMPLETION OF DESIGN
• CONSTRUCTION PHASE
• START OF CONSTRUCTION
• COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION
AUGUST 2020
SEPTEMBER 2020
DECEMBER 2021
APRIL 2022
DECEMBER 2022
NOTE: IF ROW PHASE IS NEEDED FOR ROADWAY WIDENING, CONSTRUCTION COULD BE PUSHED BACK ONE YEA.
7 I
7
Packet Pg. 214
8.3.b
SUPPORT FROM MANY AGENCIES
• EDMONDS BICYCLE ADVOCACY GROUP (EBAG)
• CASCADE BICYCLE ADVOCACY
• CITY OF SHORELINE
• CITY OF LYNNWOOD
• CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
• COMMUNITY TRANSIT
• EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Packet Pg. 215
8.3.b
CONCLUSION
• APPROVAL OF SOUND TRANSIT AGREEMENT
• Q&A /PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 216
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Review of Council Code of Conduct
Staff Lead: Council/Laura Johnson
Department: City Council
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
In December 2013, the Council passed Resolution No. 1306 adopting a new Code of Conduct and in June
2015, the Council approved a new Code of Ethics.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Councilmember Laura Johnson has revised the Code of Conduct for the Edmonds City Council to include
language that addresses appropriate communications between Council to staff, the general public, and
to fellow Councilmembers; the Council is asked to review these updates.
Attachments:
Updated Code of Conduct 2020 DRAFT
Resolution 1306 Code of Conduct
CODE —OF —ETHICS 06-02-2015
Packet Pg. 217
9.1.a
Updated Code of Conduct 2020 - DRAFT
Section 6. Council Conduct.
Councilmembers should seek to improve the quality of public service and ensure public
confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective, open, and equitable operation.
To this end, the following Code of Conduct for members of the Edmonds City Council is
established:
6.1 Conduct during Public Meetings
A. Councilmembers have a public stage to show how individuals with disparate points of view
can find common ground, demonstrate effective problem -solving approaches, and seek
solutions that benefit the community as a whole.
B. Councilmembers will practice civility and decorum in discussions and debates.
Disagreements should focus on vision, policies, and their implementation.
C. Ensuring the public feels welcome is a vital part of the democratic process. No signs of
partiality, prejudice, or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual Councilmembers
toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and
impartial in listening to public testimony.
D. Councilmembers shall prepare themselves for public issues and listen courteously and
attentively to all public discussions before the body during the meeting. Council discussions are
open and transparent and diverse ideas and opinions are welcome.
E. Whenever possible, Councilmembers shall seek to minimize surprises at public meetings
including vetting of amendments or new ideas prior to introduction and/or discussion and should
seek to provide key questions to staff ahead of public discussions.
F. While the Council is in session, Councilmembers shall neither, by conversation or otherwise,
delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council, nor disrupt any member while
speaking nor refuse to obey the orders of the Council or the Mayor, except as otherwise
provided in these Rules.
G. If a member is offended by the remarks of another member, the offended member should
make note of the words used and call for a "point of personal privilege." The meeting chair will
maintain control of this discussion and if deemed necessary, ask the offending member to
restate their remarks.
H. It is important that each Councilmember is treated equally by their Council peers. All
members are duly elected or appointed and should be afforded mutual respect. With the
exception of the Council President's agenda -setting power, no member has or shall be afforded
extraordinary powers beyond those of other members.
6.2 Conduct with City Staff
Packet Pg. 218
9.1.a
A. Councilmembers shall treat all staff as professionals with clear, honest communication that
respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each person.
B. As feasible, Council Members will work with Department Directors or designees before
meetings to obtain the information needed to participate in discussions and debates and to
make decisions.
C. City Council policy is implemented through dedicated and professional staff. To support
effective relationships, it is important that roles are clearly recognized. Councilmembers shall
avoid intrusion into areas that are the responsibility of staff and recognize that it is not the role of
the Council or its members to administer City business.
D. Councilmembers may ask Department Directors or designee about the status of work items
or request information. Except through their participation on Council, they shall not expressly or
implicitly give orders or direction, attempt to influence the decisions or recommendations of staff
members, or otherwise be involved in administrative functions.
E Councilmember communications with City Staff shall be limited to normal City business hours,
except in cases of emergency or a pre -agreed upon event or meeting held outside of normal
City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of normal business hours should be
expected no earlier than the next business day.
F. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of a City employee in
public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager. Comments about staff
performance should only be made to the Mayor through appropriate correspondence.
6.3 Conduct with Council Legislative/Administrative Assistant
A. Councilmembers shall treat the Legislative/Administrative Assistant as a professional with
clear, honest communication that respects abilities, experience, and individual dignity.
Additionally, Councilmembers are responsible for ensuring a supportive and positive work
environment for the Legislative/Administrative Assistant.
B. Given the need for shared coordination, Councilmembers shall not request the Council
Legislative Assistant to initiate any significant project or study, outside of limited research,
without the consent of the Council President. The Legislative/Administrative Assistant's time will
be divided equally among the seven Councilmembers.
D. Councilmember communications with the Legislative/Administrative Assistant shall be limited
to normal City business hours, except in cases of emergency or a pre -agreed upon event or
meeting held outside of normal City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of
normal business hours should be expected no earlier than the next business day.
E. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of the
Legislative/Administrative Assistant in public or to the Legislative Assistant directly. Comments
about performance should only be made to the Council President through appropriate
correspondence.
Packet Pg. 219
9.1.a
6.4 Conduct with Boards, Committees, Commissions, and Outside Agencies
A. The City maintains several boards and commissions as a means of encouraging and
gathering community input. Citizens who serve on boards and commissions become more
involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council or Mayor. They are a valuable
resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect.
B. Councilmembers are appointed as non -voting members to serve as the primary two-way
communication liaison between the Council and boards, commissions, and committees.
Councilmembers are not to direct the activities or work of the board, commission, or committee
C. Councilmembers may attend any board or commission meeting to which they are not
appointed but shall do so as a member of the public. Personal comments or positions, if given,
will be identified as such and shall not be represented as the position of the City or Council.
D. Councilmembers shall not contact a board or commission member to lobby on behalf of an
individual, business, or organization. It is acceptable for Councilmembers to contact the board,
committee, or commission members in order to clarify or contextualize a position taken by the
body. When making contact the relevant Council liaison should be included in such
communication.
E. When attending a non -city sponsored event, meeting, conference, or other activity, a
Councilmember may be authorized to represent the Council only upon a majority vote of the
Council. Likewise, a Councilmember may be authorized to represent the City only upon the
express permission of the Mayor.
6.5 Conduct via Technologic Communication
A. Technology allows words written or said to be distributed far and wide. Written notes,
voicemail messages, texts, and email are public records and should be treated as such.
6.6 Compliance and Enforcement
A. The integrity of individual councilmembers reflects, both positively and negatively, on the
overall public perception of the ethical behavior of the entire Council and City. Councilmembers
themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that conduct standards are understood
and met and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of its
government.
B. The Council has a responsibility to intervene when actions of a member or members appear
to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when a violation is brought to their attention. The
City Council, by majority vote, may impose sanctions on members whose conduct does not
comply with these standards. Sanctions may include any or all of the following:
Packet Pg. 220
9.1.a
1. Official verbal reprimand in an open meeting.
2. Formal public letter of censure by a majority vote of the council.
3. Loss of committee or external appointment assignment(s).
Packet Pg. 221
9.1.b
RESOLUTION NO: 1306
A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING A CODE OF CONDUCT
FOR THE MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS, AND ALL MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, OR WORK GROUPS.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that City business should be conducted publicly, in an atmosphere of respect
and civility,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the following Code of Conduct is adopted and shall apply to the Mayor,
City Councilmembers, and members of all City Boards, Commissions, or work groups.
In the course of their duties, all group leaders will:
1) provide all members a fair opportunity to participate,
2) not permit any member to dominate proceedings or intimidate other members, and
3) not permit any disrespectful behavior toward participants.
In the course of their duties, all participants, including leaders, will:
1) respect the individual talents and contributions of others,
2) avoid offensive comments and behavior,
3) avoid intimidating comments and behavior,
4) listen courteously and attentively,
5) conduct public business in an open and transparent manner,
6) assist leaders in ensuring fair treatment of all members, and
7) assist leaders in controlling disrespectful or intimidating behavior.
When speaking officially, all leaders and members will respectfully convey the position of their group. When
speaking personally, all leaders and members will disclose that their comments are their own, and not made as a
representative of their group.
This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted this 10th of December, 2013.
ATTESTI NTICA
CITY K, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: December 6, 2013
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL December 10, 2013
RESOLUTION NO: 1306
Packet Pg. 222
9.1.c
CODE OF ETHICS
The purpose of the Edmonds Code of Ethics is to strengthen the quality
of government through ethical principles which shall govern the conduct
of elected officials and appointed citizen volunteers serving in an official
capacity (i.e. Boards and Commissions).
We shall:
• Be dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government.
• Affirm the dignity and worth of the services rendered by government and
maintain a sense of social responsibility.
• Be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all public and
personal relationships.
• Recognize that the chief function of local government at all times is to serve
the best interest of all the people.
• Keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage
communications between the citizens and all municipal officers. Emphasize
friendly and courteous service to the public and each other; seek to improve
the quality of public service, and confidence of citizens.
• Seek no favor; do not personally benefit or profit by confidential information
or by misuse of public resources.
• Conduct business of the city in a manner which is not only fair in fact, but
also in appearance.
Approved by the Edmonds City Council on 06-02-2015.
Packet Pg. 223
9.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/28/2020
Ordinance updating the City's Fireworks Code
Staff Lead: Mike Nelson
Department: Mayor's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Most of the relevant fireworks code, chapter 5.27 ECC, has not been updated since the 1990s.
Staff Recommendation
Deliberate regarding the proposed Ordinance on July 28, 2020 and take action on August 4, 2020.
Narrative
The City's fireworks code has not been updated in many years. This year, during the Fourth of July
celebration, it became apparent that the City may need to strengthen the incentives to comply with the
code. Council will hear from South County Fire Assistant Fire Chief Kevin Zweber about the dangers
fireworks pose to our community.
The most significant change in this ordinance is that the penalty for violating the City's fireworks code is
being changed from a civil penalty to a misdemeanor as allowed by state law. Various state codes are
being adopted by reference for the purpose of allowing for the possibility of enforcement of those codes
in the Edmonds Municipal Court.
Various definitions are updated to conform to state law.
The fee for a public display permit is increased from $30 to $500. The $500 is an estimate of the funds
needed to cover all legitimate costs for all display permits, licenses, and authorizations from application
to and through processing, issuance, and inspection. The state limits the City's authority to set this fee
no higher than its actual costs, but in no case higher than $5,000.
Attachments:
Ordinance fireworks
Packet Pg. 224
9.2.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES ASSOCIATED
WITH VIOLATING AND OTHERWISE UPDATING THE
CITY'S FIREWORKS CODE.
WHEREAS, the state fireworks law is set forth in chapter 70.77 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the City's fireworks regulations are codified in chapter 5.27 ECC; and
WHEREAS, the penalty for violating the City's fireworks regulation has not been
updated since 1995; and
WHEREAS, recent experience during the Fourth of July holiday of 2020 suggests that
the City may need to create stronger incentives to comply with the City's fireworks code; and
WHEREAS, other aspects of the City's fireworks regulations need to be updated;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 5.27.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Definitions," is hereby
amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike -
The definitions of Chapter 70.77 RCW as now stated or hereafter amended shall
govern the construction of this chapter, when applicable. RCW 70.77.120 through and
including RCW 70.77.2412-3-0 as now stated or hereafter amended are adopted by this
reference and a copy or the same shall be kept on file in the office of the city clerk for
public use and inspection. In addition, the following term(s) are defined:
A. "Dangerous fireworks" means any firework not defined as a "common firework"
under the provisions of RCW 70.77.136.
B. The "local fire official" for the purposes of chapter 70.77 RCW shall be the City's
fire marshal.
Packet Pg. 225
9.2.a
Section 2. Section 5.27.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Sale, possession, use
and discharge of fireworks unlawful," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown
in underline; deleted text is shown in strike dffe g ):
A. It is unlawful for any person to sell, possess, use, transfer, discharge,
ignite or explode any fireworks within the city; provided that this prohibition shall not
apply to the following activities, when authorized by a state license and city permit:
and
1.A-. Duly authorized public displays, as provided in RCW 70.77.260;
2.B-. Duly authorized use by religious organizations or private
organizations or persons for religious or other specific purposes on an approved
date and in an approved location, as provided in RCW 70.77.311(2).
B. RCW 70.77.485, entitled "Unlawful possession of fireworks —Penalties,"
RCW 70.77.540, entitled "Penalty," RCW 70.77.515, entitled "Unlawful sales or
transfers of consumer fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.488, entitled "Unlawful
discharge or use of fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.517, entitled "Unlawful
transportation of fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.520, entitled "Unlawful to permit fire
nuisance where fireworks kept —Penalty," and RCW 70.77.510 entitled "Unlawful sales
or transfers of display fireworks —Penalty," collectively, as now stated or hereafter
amended, are adopted by this reference and a copy or the same shall be kept on file in the
office of the citv clerk for public use and inspection.
Section 3. Section 5.27.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Permit fees," is hereby
amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-rike-
The fee for a "public display permit" for public display of fireworks shall be
$30.00 $500.00 payable in advance. In addition, in the event that the location specified in
Packet Pg. 226
9.2.a
the permit has unusual parameters, limitations or risks requiring inspection over and
above that anticipated in the establishment of this fee (that is in excess of one hour), a
charge for inspection shall be paid by the applicant equal to the actual cost of providing
the inspection. See ECDC 19.75.065.
Section 4. Section 5.27.180 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Enforcement," is
hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
strike thfet+gh):
The police chief, fire marshal ehie€, or their designees, are }s authorized to enforce
all provisions of this chapter and, in addition to criminal sanctions or civil remedies, he
may revoke any permit issued pursuant to this chapter upon any failure or refusal of the
permittee to comply with the orders and directives of the police chief, fire marshal,
eh of or their designees;i and/or to eemp!y 2) with any provisions of this chapter or the
requirements of the community development code relating to temporary structures.
Section 5. Section 5.27.210 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Penalty and violations,"
is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter
which does not also constitute a violation of state law shall be guilty of a eivil in fF et ,r
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than
$1,000 and/or jail not to exceed 90 dWs-a fine-of$50 northe first enexse, $100 00 f
the seeend offense, $150.00 for- the third offense and $200.00 for- eaeh offense with
moo year- period-. Any violation of this chapter which also constitutes a violation of state
law shall be punishable under state law penalties. In addition, any fireworks that are
involved in the violation may be confiscated.
Packet Pg. 227
9.2.a
Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 228
9.2.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES
ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATING AND OTHERWISE
UPDATING THE CITY'S FIREWORKS CODE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2020.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
5
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 229