The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-08-18 City Council - Full Agenda-2639o Agenda Edmonds City Council V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 18, 2020, 7:00 PM CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING MAY CONNECT VIA ZOOM AT ANY POINT BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PERIOD. CITIZENS WILL SIT IN A VIRTUAL WAITING ROOM UNTIL THEIR TURN TO SPEAK. WHEN THE CITIZEN ENTERS THE LIVE COUNCIL MEETING, THEIR TIME WILL BEGIN. THE CLERK WILL BE THE TIME KEEPER AND PROVIDE A 30-SECOND WARNING AND A FINAL WARNING WHEN THEIR TIME IS UP. THE CITIZEN WILL BE REMOVED AND THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOWED IN. CITIZENS MAY CONNECT WITH A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE AT: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/S/4257752525 OR JOIN THE MEETING BY PHONE AT: 888 475 4499 (TOLL FREE) OR 877 853 5257 (TOLL FREE) MEETING ID 425 775 2525 CITIZENS NOT WISHING TO PARTICIPATE IN AUDIENCE COMMENTS MAY CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE LIVESTREAM ON THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, CABLE TV, OR TELEPHONE BY CALLING (712) 775-7270, ACCESS CODE 583224. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525) 6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA Edmonds City Council Agenda August 18, 2020 Page 1 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 29, 2020 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 4, 2020 3. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of August 11, 2020 4. Approval of Council Committee Meeting Minutes of August 11, 2020 5. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 6. Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Osborn Consulting, Inc. for the Phase 2 & 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project 7. STUDY ITEMS 1. Critical Areas Ordinance Report (15 min) 2. Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment Introduction (25 min) 8. ACTION ITEMS 1. Climate Target Resolution (30 min) 2. Ordinance amending the Fireworks Code (30 min) 3. Review of Council Code of Conduct (60 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda August 18, 2020 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 29, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 07-29-2020 Draft Council Special Meeting/Budget Retreat Minutes Packet Pg. 3 6.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE BUDGET RETREAT DRAFT MINUTES July 29, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/OPENING REMARKS STAFF PRESENT Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Serv. Dir Dave Turley, Interim Finance Director Maureen Judge, Council Legislative Assistant Tom Brubaker, City Attorney's Office Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online retreat was called to order at 1:03 p.m. by Council President Fraley-Monillas. City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating virtually. Mayor Nelson provided opening remarks; when he was a Councilmember, he also participated in and was a graduate of the Mike Bailey budget school. He enjoyed it and found it helpful to understand the roles of the legislative and executive branches and the importance of collaborating. This year there is a lot of interest in starting that process earlier; unfortunately, COVID-19 put everything on hold and has changed how things are done including the meeting format where it is challenging to have more substantive, in- depth conversations but everyone is getting used to this environment. Unlike other previous economic crises, this being an ongoing pandemic, there is a lot uncertainty moving forward. As the Council looks at the budget and the projections, he encouraged them to take everything with grain of a salt, particularly projections, because in one moment things can be going great and cases are going down and the next moment, COVID cases start going up. It is uncertain whether more shutdowns will be required and potentially more loss of revenue or if things will improve. Fortunately, Edmonds has been able to weather the storm better than many cities. He looked forward to working with the Council on the budget. Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked Mayor Nelson for his opening remarks. She thanked Mr. Bailey for agreeing to provide this training at the City's request. The City has four new Councilmembers who have not participated in a city budget before; she could not think of anyone better at doing budgets than Mr. Bailey. He is well known throughout the state for his work in budgeting and the City is lucky he could accommodate this training in his schedule. She also thanked Councilmembers for attending today's retreat. The priorities that the Council identifies today will be provided to the administration and once the Mayor and his staff have time to review them and see how they fit with their priorities, another meeting will be held with administration. Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 6.1.a (Mayor Nelson left the meeting at 1:08 p.m.) 2. Mike Bailey, trainer/facilitator for the retreat, introduced himself and described his background. He noted the conversation for some will be redundant but it is also an opportunity to relevel set thinking so everyone is on the same page. He described procedures for making this as interactive as possible and the approach for today — to start the conversation with some context, explanation of roles and process and an opportunity for Councilmembers to identify priorities for the upcoming budget. 3. REVIEW OF THE BUDGET PROCESS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, AND "BEST PRACTICES" THAT RESULT IN THE BEST OUTCOMES Mr. Bailey presented regarding municipal budgeting: • A Budget Construct Finance Role (which resources) ° .y N Operations Role (how, when & with what/who) Policy Role ° W (what, how much & ground rules U *Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) Budget Peer Review Program Framework Roles of the Budget Makers o Policy makers (council) — make policy! ■ Provide policy guidance at the beginning ■ Confirms budget meets direction by adoption ■ Monitors for conformity and results o CEO/CAO (Mayors, city managers) — ■ Propose policy at the beginning ■ Develops organization strategy to implement policy o Departments ■ Develop operational strategy ■ Provide service (departments can be passionate about this!) ■ Accountable for "day to day" o Public —"stakeholders" ■ Observes results and "counsels" policy makers "Reporting Pyramid" Residents, business, mmunity Nedia Investors / outreach efforts) Council/ Po N y/Accountability Commission (brierkngs, reports,questions) Mayor / Manager Orgam ational Management Chief Executive Officer (briefing reports, high level data) Department Directors Functiona anagement (reports, millevel data) Managers / Supervi rs Program Manl, ement line item level ta, transactions • Governmental Accounting Terminology o Appropriation — Legal authorization granted by council to make expenditures Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 5 6.1.a o Reserved Fund Balance — balance not available for appropriation because it is legally restricted o Unreserved Fund Balance — balance available for appropriation, may also be known as "ending" fund balance o Inter -Fund Transfer — Flow of assets (such as cash) without equivalent flow in return and without requirement to repay o Inter -Fund Loan — Loan mechanism authorized between funds if legislative authority adopts, provides for concise repayment plan o Budget Ordinance — The legal document that adopts the budget and sets the appropriation construct and limits What is "Fund Accounting"? o Government accounting systems are organized and operated on a fund basis o Used to segregate resources related to specific activities o Often used to segregate restricted resources o Defined as a fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts Basic Fund Types General Governmental Proprietary Fiduciary General Enterprise Trust Special Revenue Water Agency Hotel/Motel Tax Sewer Pension City Street (Gas Tax) Storm Permanent Impact Fees Electric Debt Service Golf General Obligation Internal Service Capital Projects Data Processing Arterial Street (gas tax) Equipment Rental Construction in progress Print shop Unemployment Compensation Governmental Fund Types o General Fund (aka: Current Expense) ■ Chief operating fund of state/local government ■ Used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund (everything not in other funds) ■ Can include sub funds (Contingency or Reserve Fund) o Special Revenue Funds ■ Account for proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes ■ Edmonds Examples: Hotel/Motel tax, Street (Street Construction) Funds o Capital Projects ■ Account for financial resources to be used for acquisition or construction of major capital facilities ■ Does not include capital facilities financed by proprietary funds/trust funds ■ Edmonds has a common capital project fund o Debt Service ■ Account for accumulation of resources for, and payment of, general long term principal and interest ■ Edmonds has debt service funds for its GO & LID bonds Primary Resources of Governmental Funds o Revenue Types: ■ Taxes Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 6 6.1.a - Property Tax - Retail Sales Tax - Business & Operations and utility taxes, gambling, leasehold, motor eh fuel tax, etc. ■ Charges for services ■ Licenses/permits ■ Intergovernmental state shared revenues and grants ■ Rental fees ■ Assessments • Proprietary Funds o Enterprise Funds ■ Operated/financed similar to private business, where intent of governing body is cost recovery ■ Account for operations financed through user charges ■ In Edmonds these are: Water, Sewer, Storm Water o Internal Service Funds ■ Finance goods/services provided by one department/agency to other government departments ■ Used to allocate cost of providing services to other funds ■ In Edmonds: Fleet and Technology Funds • Primary Resources for Proprietary Funds o Revenue Types: ■ Charges for services ■ Connection fees ■ Sale of merchandise ■ Inter departmental costs ■ Rental fees ■ Assessments ■ Grants/loans/bonds • Fiduciary Funds o Trust & Agency Funds ■ Assets held by governmental entity in trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units, and/or other funds - Expendable trust funds - Non -expendable trust funds - Pension and Investment trust funds - Agency funds - In Edmonds this is the Fire Pension Fund Mr. Bailey and Mr. Turley responded to questions regarding reallocating unexpended funds for another purpose, the budget amendment process, carryforwards for incomplete capital projects, and reducing an appropriation if a capital project does not move forward. Mr. Bailey continued his presentation: • Key Elements of City Finance o Budgeting ■ Appropriation ordinance for immediate needs ■ Strategic planning (long term) o Reporting ■ Internal and external o Oversight (Internal Control) ■ Review Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 7 6.1.a ■ Monitoring ■ Policies • Budgeting o Budget is economic plan that focuses entity's financial & human resources on o the accomplishment of specific goals & objectives established by policymakers o Establishes annual (or biennial) expenditure levels for all departments & funds o Expenditure levels are called appropriations & represent spending limits The Council took a brief recess. 4. FINISH PROCESS REVIEW Mr. Bailey continued his presentation: • Budgeting Mission o Mission of budget process is: ■ Help decision makers make informed choices about provision of services and capital assets ■ Promote stakeholder participation in the process Requirements o Fundamentally — Budget adopted prior to start of fiscal year ■ Steps: 1. Request for budget estimates (RCW 35.33.031) 2. Estimates filed with Clerk (RCW 35.33.031) 3. Clerk presents preliminary estimates to CAO (RCW 35.33.051) 4. CAO presents Preliminary Budget to Legislative (RCW 35.33.135) 5. CAO files "Final Budget Proposal" with Clerk (RCW 35.33.055) 6. CAO Files "Final Budget Proposal / Budget message" with Legislative (RCW 35.33.057) 7. Publication and conduct of hearings (RCW 35.33.061 & 057 & 071; also RCW 84.55.120) 8. Legislative Adopts a Budget (RCW 35.33.075) ■ Sample Budget Calendar for Cities and Towns: 2019 Budget Calendar for Cities and Towns March — Pre -Budget Items August Council retreat Update and/or adopt financial policies Public hearings for capital facility plan updates Public forums or community outreach (ex: community priorities) Mayo anaer communicates budget objectives to staff September Sept 10 Budget request to all department heads Sept 10-23 Department heads prepare estimates of revenues and expenditures Clerk prepares estimates for debt service and all other estimates Sept 24 Budget estimates from department heads filed with clerk Sept 25 Implicit price deflator calculated (only applies to cities of 10,000 + population) October Oct 1 Clerk provides estimates filed by department heads to Mayor/Manager showing complete financial program Mayor/Manager provides Council with estimates of revenues from all sources including estimates prepared by clerk for consideration of setting property tax levy Mid -Oct to Mid -Nov (suggested) Public hearing on revenue sources including possible increases in property tax November Nov 2 Mayor/Manager prepared preliminary budget and budget message. Files with clerk Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 8 6.1.a and Council. Nov 2-20 Publication notice of preliminary budget and final hearing Nov 2-29 Public hearing(s) on preliminary budget. Public hearing on revenue sources for levy setting Nov19 Copies of budget available to public Nov 30 Property tax levies set by ordinance and filed with the County December Dec 3 Final budget hearing Dec 31 Budget adoption Budget Policies o Sample topics to consider: 1. Type of budget (priority based budgets) 2. Duration (annual or biennial) 3. Use of one time resources / definition of balanced budget 4. Fund balance targets 5. Amending the budget 6. Budget calendar / approach 7. Fees / user charges Getting the Most... o Policy Elements ■ Strategic focus / alignment with policy goals ■ High level description of value delivered - Budget message - Budget "highlights" section ■ Financial Policies ■ Operational Elements ■ Capital investments ■ Debt program o Operations ■ Translating policy guidance into action 1. Organization chart 2. Authorized employees (with 3. Department descriptions a. Or similar organizational unit information b. Goals, accomplishments, action plans, performance data o Financial Elements ■ Strategic Financial Plan 1. Sources and uses of funds (including the appropriation) a. Multiple years for comparison 2. Operating unit budgets (departments, divisions) 3. Description of revenues / basis for forecasts 4. Long range forecast (description and schedule) ■ FY 2018/19 Budget Summary for all Funds o Communication Elements ■ Organizational transparency (it's other people's 1. Budget message (again) a. Also highlights 2. Clearly organized (include a table of contents / 3. Environmental scan (what's changed that you are reacting 4. Charts, graphs Reports - What to Look For Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 9 6.1.a o Budget comparison ■ How are year to date expenditures and revenue ■ estimates compared to budget appropriations? ■ Understand what the variables are o Fund balance ■ Do you have any funds with cash flow issues? o Debt analysis ■ Are you considering additional debt? ■ Are there interfund loans? ■ Do you presently reserve for future capital needs? MRSC Process summary o Pre -budget (spring/summer) ■ To do (recommended - Host a council retreat - Host a staff budget objectives discussion - Organize community priority forums - Update your capital facilities plan - Review and update financial policies ■ The down time in the budget cycle is the perfect time for getting your priorities and policies in order o Budget Estimate (summer/fall) ■ To do - Official call to budget - Revenue and expense estimates developed by a department head - Clerk compiles all estimates (including debt service estimates) and presents to Council - Host a public hearing on potential property tax increases ■ Provide staff with a budget information form to ensure clear and consistent estimates o Preliminary budget (fall/winter) ■ To do: - Filing of preliminary budget with budget message - Make preliminary budget publicly available - Host public budget hearings - Set property tax levies and file with the county ■ Use innovative and engaging outreach strategies to help your community understand the budget story o Final Budget (winter) ■ To do: - Adopt budget by ordinance - File final budget with MRSC - Make the final budget easily accessible to the public ■ Make sure the budget ordinance you adopt fits well with the budget document your leaders approved State Auditor's Office o State Auditor's Office (SAO) established by state constitution o RCW 43.09.200 states that SAO shall prescribe the accounting and reporting to be used by governmental entities o Center for Government Innovation "The Center" o Local Government Financial Resource System Resources o AWC (wacities.org) - workshops/training Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 7 Packet Pg. 10 6.1.a o MRSC (mrsc.org) — webpages & trainings ■ mrsc.org/financialpolicies ■ mrsc.org/budgeting ■ Call/email with questions o GFOA (gfoa.org/publications) ■ Publication series for elected officials ■ Best practice series o WA State Auditor's Office (sao.wa.gov) ■ The Center — performance@sao.wa.gov ■ SAO Helpdesk Questions and comments included managing for results and concern that sidewalks are not prioritized in Edmonds. 5. COUNCIL PRIORITIES: "AROUND THE HORN" PARTICIPATION 1. WHAT WOULD EACH OF YOU HOPE TO EMPHASIZE AS A CITY IN THE NEXT BUDGET, AND Mr. Bailey invited Councilmembers to share one idea for something they wanted prioritized or emphasized in the upcoming budget and something they would be willing to see deemphasized in the budget. He suggested Councilmembers briefly explain their proposal but not why it had merit. Councilmembers can ask clarifying questions but the intent is not a full discussion. Mr. Bailey said the Council's work is the most difficult part of budget. In fairness to those who are preparing the budget, in order to emphasize something, Councilmembers need to be willing to deemphasize something else. Discussion followed regarding the City's financials being in flux due to COVID and union negotiations this year, and the Council looking at essential services in the next budget. Mr. Bailey suggested Councilmembers review the budget suggestions book put out by MSRC. He commented there is no sense of context now, this recession occurred at an unparalleled rate in history and some recovery occurred in May and June and now COVID numbers are trending upward leaving a lot of uncertainty. Discussion continued regarding the percentage of the City's expenditures allocated to personnel costs and parameters for identifying priorities/emphasizes and/or items to be deemphasized. Council President Fralev-Monillas Priority: Hire a full-time social worker to create a department of its own (who they would report to would be determined) who would also supervise part-time staff. Deemphasize/Funding: City is losing the Police Department social worker (shared with Lynnwood who is no longer planning to fund). Acting Chief Lawless recommended adding the Police Department's share of the part-time social worker to the full-time social worker. The intent is to obtain grants to pay for the position. Unless the City has an embedded social worker, people cannot enter the program in Everett related to homelessness. The City currently does not have a social worker other than Police Department's embedded social worker. Issues in the City include mental illness, the extremely poor and indigent who are seeking resources, and the homeless population. Having someone to connect with those people would be beneficial to the City. Councilmember Buckshnis Priority: Fix the CIP/CFP to deemphasize a $16 million stormwater project and move it back into Parks as a nearshore estuary so it can be treated as a regional park. Councilmember K. Johnson Priority: Achieve more sidewalk projects within the City and base it on a priority and percentage. People often complain about sidewalks. The City's policy is only to require sidewalks on one side of the street. Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 8 Packet Pg. 11 6.1.a Short sidewalk projects to fix missing gaps as well as long sidewalk projects have been identified, but the only way sidewalks are built is associated with development or other capital projects. Questions and comments followed regarding the Complete Streets ordinance, concern bike projects have been implemented through Bike2Health and Sound Transit project but there has been no contribution from the City to sidewalks projects, the concrete crew that is involved with constructing sidewalks, concern the concrete crew is working on ADA ramps and not sidewalks, and other projects the concrete crew does. Mr. Bailey suggested a priority of expanding the availability of sidewalks and pedestrian accessibility and clarifying the Council's interest in addressing gaps and sidewalks in priority areas. Councilmember K. Johnson wondered if funding could be provided by Parks because sidewalks provide recreation. Councilmember Olson Emphasize: Overdue infrastructure repairs. The recent leak in City Hall is a reminder of how many things have been neglected It is prudent to make repairs so they do not become more expensive. Deemphasize: Divest the City from ownership of some capital assets. One example is if citizens were open to the idea, have a commercial enterprise take over the Edmonds Museum and maintain its historic value. Old buildings cost a lot to maintain; buildings the City owns need to be maintained, privatization is an opportunity to offset repairs. Councilmember Paine Emphasize: Hire a code writer for a three-year temporary position to help support rewriting the code which has been languishing and needs to be better aligned. There has been frustration for years with the code; a dedicated long term temporary person could allow progress to be made on that. Questions and comments followed regarding the part-time position in the 2020 budget to assist with the code rewrite, whether zoning would be part of that in view of the Housing Commission's recommendations at the end of the year, past inclusion of a part-time person because that was all that the City could afford, and anticipation the work would take three years. Deemphasize: Some professional services which can be very expensive, and reduce overtime costs particularly in law enforcement and justify the need for overtime budgets. Questions and comments included reducing costs by scheduling Council consideration of projects that include professional services at the beginning of the agenda. Councilmember L. Johnson Priority: Expanding the human services department and adding a full time social worker at a minimum. The need already existed but is increasing due to the impacts of COVID-19 and the economic downturn. Keeping people in their homes, assisting those who are currently unhoused, and assisting those who are experiencing domestic violence. Agree with Councilmember Paine's emphasis on the code rewrite. Funding: Fund via the half-time Police Department social worker and funds previously allocated for a School Resource Officer. Councilmember Distelhorst Priority: Increase community wellness efforts, reference City Council budget priority item 3 for 2020 human services department and adding mental health, addiction and domestic violence. Funding: Use current Police Department funds for these services. Council President Fraley-Monillas Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 9 Packet Pg. 12 6.1.a Emphasize: Reallocate staff to community policing along Highway 99 to facilitate a continuous police presence so they get to know businesses, residents, etc. Funding: Cost neutral. Councilmember Buckshnis Priority: Code rewrite. Councilmember K. Johnson Priority: Continue work on the 4"' Avenue Arts Corridor Councilmember Olson Priority: Put time, effort and possibly money into the parking issue in the downtown core. Could include one-way streets with angled parking, boutique garage, etc. Discuss whether the City can still afford to develop Civic Field. There are limitations on how the land can be used due to funding sources for its purchase; consider whether it could be used for unpaved parking on a temporary basis until the City can afford to develop it. Questions and comments included support for a parking study, a parking study considering parking needs for Civic Field and the Waterfront Center, whether a parking study would be valid during COVID, cities in Europe with street closures that have a garage, and impacts to the City's budget if businesses are not supported. Councilmember Paine Priority: Consider opportunities to purchase open space or parcels to help supplement parks particularly near Lake Ballinger. As the City become denser, will need more open space for recreational activities. Councilmember K. Johnson expressed support for this priority. Questions and comments included the Council's elimination of open space acquisition from the 2020 budget to provide funds for the Waterfront Center, whether this would include purchasing the Unocal property, adding to the City's open space by any means necessary, and purchasing property east of Highway 99. Councilmember L. Johnson Priority: Code update/rewrite and making information more accessible to the community. Questions and comments included having public engagement in advance of the code rewrite. Councilmember Distelhorst Priority: Communications and public engagement. The City has a part-time communications person; need for outreach is much greater than what is budgeted and is not even close to what the City, Councilmembers and the community deserves. Deemphasize: Purchase of trolley Questions and comments included the trolley being a priority for the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, decreased cost of the trolley, cost of operating the trolley, and likelihood of reduced ridership on the trolley due to reduced capacity on public infrastructure. Councilmember K. Johnson Priority: Update strategic plan to get projects and priorities in order and coordinate with public. Mr. Bailey suggested combining this with Councilmember Buckshnis' priority regarding the CIP/CFP. Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 10 Packet Pg. 13 6.1.a Councilmember Olson Priority: Determine the cost and get historic protective status for the Edmonds Theater. When she asked people what is special and important about downtown, the theater was mentioned most often. Without protection, similar buildings in other communities have been redeveloped. Not just the City's historical registry but state or national registry. Questions and comments included a 2020 budget item to pursue placing all historic buildings in the CBD on the City's registry that has been delayed to 2021 due to COVID, lack of protection via the local historic registry, methods such as a contract term on the property, and King County's purchase of development rights for agricultural land. Councilmember Paine Priority: Allocating funds for employees safety supplies such as masks, PPE, etc. Councilmember L. Johnson Priority: Infrastructure preservation and expansion to increase connectivity and safety citywide which includes trails, sidewalks, bike lanes, crosswalks, and 4-way stops near school routes. Questions and comments included Complete Streets which focuses on schools. Councilmember Distelhorst Priority: Multimodal City infrastructure, develop the network throughout the City and ensuring all neighborhoods have connectivity and easy access. Questions and comments included areas throughout the City without sidewalks, ensuring that citizens want sidewalks in their neighborhoods, and benefits of sidewalks to the entire community. Councilmember Olson Priority: Rebuilding reserves. The City is living the value of having reserves. An earthquake was envisioned as the disaster when reserves were planned; that could still happen. Ensure there are funds in the budget for a continued or new rainy day. Agree mental health is a need in the community. Questions and comments included that only a few Council priorities will be included in the budget and usually no cost or low cost items, City not being to afford many of the identified priorities in the coming year, positions in the 2020 budget that were not funded, and existing policies regarding reestablishing reverses. Councilmember K. Johnson Priority: Watershed planning for Perrinville Creek and Shell Creek. Have done a good job planning for the marsh but these are important tributaries. Existing staff could do this and Students Saving Salmon is collecting data. Questions and comments included the Salmon Safe certification that looks at policies and procedures and infrastructure. Councilmember Olson Priority: Determine if Airbnb, VRBO, etc. rentals pay lodging tax. The City's one hotel pays lodging tax. The need for hotel space is being addressed by short term rentals and they should be taxed the same way as hotels. Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 11 Packet Pg. 14 6.1.a Questions and comments included hotels on Highway 99 that pay lodging tax and the Planning Board's consideration of short term rentals a couple years. 2. WHAT WOULD EACH OF YOU BE WILLING TO DE-EMPHASIZE IN THE NEXT BUDGET See above. DISCUSSION OF PRIORITIES AND NARROWING TO FOUR MAJOR PRIORITIES Mr. Bailey recognized narrowing priorities was difficult to do on Zoom; some narrowing has occurred by Councilmembers voicing supporting for others' priorities. As the Council moves forward, it is important to identify priorities including the highest priorities. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested Councilmembers email priorities to Mr. Bailey and copy Council Legislative Assistant Maureen Judge. Mr. Bailey noted now is the time to identify priorities instead of in November. 7. FINAL REMARKS OF THE DAY Councilmembers thanked Mr. Bailey. He invited Councilmembers to contact him via MSRC and to utilize MRSC's workshops and resources. The retreat was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Edmonds City Council Budget Retreat Draft Minutes July 29, 2020 Page 12 Packet Pg. 15 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 4, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 08-04-2020 Draft City Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 16 6.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING DRAFT MINUTES August 4, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Jim Lawless, Interim Police Chief Phil Williams, Public Works Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Mgr. Dave Turley, Interim Finance Director Rob English, City Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember K. Johnson read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. Councilmember K. Johnson asked whether the Council was ready for Agenda Item 8.2, Approval of Sound Transit Funding Agreement for Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project bicycle and Item 8.3, Proposed Amendment to ECC 2.10.010 for Council Review of Appointive Positions, or if further discussion was needed before taking action. Council President Fraley-Monillas said although she had not spoken to all Councilmembers, she believed the Council was as ready as they were going to get and if the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 17 6.2.a Council was not ready, it would be quickly apparent. She suggested continuing to move forward because she did not know each Councilmember's position. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. JOHN REED PROCLAMATION Mayor Nelson read a proclamation thanking the Family of John Reed for his help and hard work in shaping Edmonds and proclaiming August 4th as John Reed Day in Edmonds and asking all Edmonds citizens to show their appreciation for John's endeavors on behalf of the Edmonds community with a moment of silence. Mayor Nelson recognized Mr. Reed's daughter Rebecca Linville and son Justin Reed who were present at the Zoom meeting. Ms. Linville thanked the Council for letting them be a part of the meeting and recognizing their dad's hard work and dedicated service. He loved Edmonds and loved working with many on the Council. His family is proud of him and the work he did for the City. He was a great person, father, grandfather, and friend. They haven't had a chance to memorialize him and hoped to have something in Edmonds in the future. Ms. Linville explained after her dad passed away and Justin and she were going through his things, they found his bronze star medal. They knew he spent time in Vietnam, but did not hear much about it. The bronze star medal is the fourth highest military honor that someone can receive. They were unaware that he had received that medal, she assumed for a variety of reasons. It shows that he didn't do things for accolades, he was very quiet about all the work he did and the great things he accomplished in life and notoriety given to him. They miss him so much and thanked the Council for recognizing all the years of work and the great things he did for the City of Edmonds. Justin Reed echoed his sister's comments and thanked the Council for recognizing his dad. It means a lot to Rebecca and his families and affirms how much their dad cared about Edmonds and how much he meant to the City. 2. SECOND QUARTER FINANCE REPORT Acting Finance Director Dave Turley expressed his sorrow to the Reeds for their loss. He reviewed: • 2020 Sales Tax Revenues Sales Tax: receipted For Sales made in: Budgeted Actual or (Over) Actual or in: Revenue Estimated Under Estimate, Receipts Budget as a % of Budget January 2020 November 2019 $635,000 $692,248 $ 57,248) 109% (Actual) February 2020 December 2019 800,000 847,349 (47,349) 106% (Actual) March 2020 January 2020 595,000 648,279 (53,279) 109% (Actual) April 2020 February 2020 565,000 503,725 61,275 89% (Actual) May 2020 March 2020 730,000 500,196 229,804 69% (Actual) June 2020 April 2020 666,000 570,127 95,873 86% (Actual) July 2020 May 2020 707,000 565,600 141,400 80% (Estimate) August 2020 June 2020 785,000 588,750 196,250 75% (Estimate) September 2020 July 2020 730,000 511,000 219,000 70% (Estimate) October 2020 August 2020 748,000 523,600 224,400 70% (Estimate) November 2020 September 2020 789,000 552,300 236,700 70% (Estimate) December 2020 October 2020 700,000 490,000 210,000 70% (Estimate) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 18 6.2.a $8,450,000 $6,993,174 $1,456,826 83% Edmonds' economy is not doing as poorly as other areas of the country o Parks is down considerably due to canceling nearly all summer programs o New construction is still going strong o Real estate sales remain strong ■ REET revenues are ahead of budget o Most revenues are below budget as can be expected, but not significantly o Due to strategic cuts in some expenses, expense reductions more than offset loss in revenues over the year Update General Fund Forecast for 2020 Amended Budget Current Updated Forecast Revenue Property Taxes $14,850,148 $14,850,000 100% Retail Sales Tax 8,450,000 7,000,000 83% Other Sales Tax 760,500 720,000 95% Utility Tax 6,776,200 6,720,000 99% Other Taxes 343,740 320,000 93% License/Permits/Franchise 1,585,130 1,485,000 94% Construction Permits 675,600 676,000 100% Grants 36,650 36,650 100% State Revenues 910,410 960,000 105% Charges for Goods & Services 3,127,662 2,600,000 83% Interfund Service Charges 3,290,838 3,040,000 92% Fines & Forfeitures 542,940 320,000 59% Miscellaneous Revenues 918,240 800,000 87% Transfers 1,535,800 1,035,000 67% Total Revenues 43,803,858 40,462,650 Change in Revenues -7.4% Expenditures Labor 17,820,288 17,107,476 96% Benefits 6,599,678 6,335,691 96% Supplies 519,786 524,984 101% Services 18,996,956 18,427,047 97% Capital 1,048,120 298,120 28% Debt Service 306,600 306,600 100% Transfers 3,266,993 1,266,993 39% Total Expenses $48,58,421 $44,266,912 Chance in Expenses -8.8% Revenues minus Expenses 4,754,563 3,704,262 Beginning Fund Balance 19,050,690 19,050,690 Projected Ending Fund Balance $14,296,127 $15,346,428 Mr. Turley recalled a question during last week's Council retreat whether the City's salaries and benefits equate to 70-80% like a lot of other cities. His research he found Edmonds' salaries and benefits come to about 50%; one of the big reasons is because Edmonds outsources fire protection. He pointed out the Services line, $18,996,956, approximately half of which is fire protection. If the City had a Fire Department, salaries and benefits would be approximately 70-75%. Mr. Turley continued his presentation: • Graph Sales Tax Revenue last 4 Quarters budget to actual July 2018 — June 2020 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 19 6.2.a o Chart sales tax revenues budget to actual July -Dec 2018, Jan -June 2019, July -Dec 2019 and Jan -June 2020 • Graph REET Revenues last 4 Quarters budget to actual July 2018 — June 2020 o Chart REET revenues budget to actual July -Dec 2018, Jan -June 2019, July -Dec 2019 and Jan -June 2020 • Parks Operating Expense Budget last 4 quarters budget to actual July 2018 — June 2020 o Chart parks operating expenses budget actual July -Dec 2018, Jan -June 2019, July -Dec 2019 and Jan -June 2020 • Police Expense Budget lasts 4 quarters budget to actual July 2018 — June 2020 o Chart police operating expenses budget to actual July -Dec 2018, Jan -June 2019, July -Dec 2019 and Jan -June 2020 • Fund Balance in the General Fund — Reserved and Unreserved (policy requires report to Council every August about fund balances) o General Fund Operating Revenue = 16% of GF Operating Adopted Expenditure Budget ■ General Fund Subfunds $7.97 million (amount in excess of required policy) ■ General Fund Operating Reserve: $7.72 million (16% of operating budget) ■ Civic Field: $2 million Councilmember Buckshnis said she had sent Mr. Turley about ten questions. She asked why the General Fund and Changes in Fund Balance was not included in the packet. She asked why there was a difference between the ending fund balance in 2019 of $11.3 million and the beginning fund balance in 2020 of $15.5 million. Mr. Turley said the reason it was not in packet was after he uploaded the information at deadline, he realized it was not included. With regard to the beginning and ending fund balance, the two columns on the right on the schedule are actually January to June so they are six month balances. Typically in a year-to-year comparison, the ending fund balance for one year is the beginning fund balance in the next column. Councilmember Buckshnis said this can be verified on page 15 of the budget book. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the spreadsheet on packet page 19, Revenues — General Fund, expressing appreciation for the footnotes. She asked if he had any insight about car sales. Mr. Turley said he has not visited any of the dealerships to talk to them. Sales tax revenue from car sales tracks more closely to what matters to the City versus the number of cars they sell; the last six months of 2020 compared to the same 6 months in 2019, sales tax is about 16% lower. If that tracks with car sales, they are about 15-16% below last year at this time, not a bad reduction all things considered. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out Utilities in the same spreadsheet, Line 14, shows near all has been used up in first six months; she asked about that discrepancy. Mr. Turley said he would look into it. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to overtime in the Street Fund, Storm, HR, Police, Development Services, etc., and asked if that was COVID related. Mr. Turley answered not really. In Public Works, it was due to snow in January, the wayside horns and Main Street opening. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Expenditures by Fund — Detail (page 24), noting repairs and maintenance in REET 125 and 126 are already over budget, one 115% of budget and the other 179%. Mr. Turley answered the bulk was attributable to parks, there was a large contract for design work on Civic Field; much of it was done in the second half of last year and the other half done during the first half of this year, a $1.2-1.3 million contract. Councilmember Buckshnis said she had several other questions but would talk to staff offline tomorrow. She referred to City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail (page 48) and complimented Mr. Turley on the investment portfolio. She asked if any of the bonds were callable. Mr. Turley was not certain bond by Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 20 bond, some may not be callable for a year; he assumed interest rates were such that when they become callable they would be called. Recalling the City received a AAA rating, Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the City had issued bonds. Mr. Turley answered yes. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if general obligation in non -departmental was ECA. Mr. Turley answered that is the Civic bonds; the City does not make any bond payments on behalf of the ECA. Councilmember K. Johnson commented the City is in good shape with its fund balance, in a large part due to the prior administration, prior finance director, Long Range Financial Committee and the Finance Committee who were working together to ensure a healthy fund balance and reserves just in case a tragedy occurred like what occurred in Arlington. With regard to the updated General Fund forecast for 2020, she recalled Mr. Turley saying not as much would be spent under transfers due to postponing some capital projects. She asked him to describe which projects would be postponed. Mr. Turley answered $2 million was budgeted for 2020 for Civic Field; $2 million that was set aside in the General Fund which was included in the budget as a transfer and another $1 million was budgeted for capital facilities maintenance. A lot of that work will not be done. Councilmember K. Johnson suggested Parks and Public Works provide an update to Council to identify those projects. She commented there was a great deal of interest in Civic Field and the City has sold bonds; she asked if the City was engaging in that project or postponing it. Mr. Turley said Civic Field went out to bid in April; the bids were much higher than budgeted. With all things considered, rebidding has been put off until early next year. Public Works Director Phil Williams said the next four months will be very busy including the elevator repair ($400,000), replacing all the windows on the east side of City Hall, re-lamping City Hall and similar LED updates in other buildings. He anticipated that would all be accomplished between now and the end of the year. Public Works is not delaying any projects. There were also funds in the budget for the marsh; those are primarily utility funds although some general governmental funds would have been required to match the grant, but that project is not moving forward this year. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to Police Operating Expenses (page 12), and asked why it was under budget. Mr. Turley answered one significant item is the budget includes a police chief and two assistant police chiefs. The City currently has Acting Chief Lawless doing the work of two people which results in a significant salary savings. He concluded that was likely a large part of it. Councilmember Olson referred to the Updated General Fund Forecast for 2020 (page 8) and asked if deceased fines and forfeitures was related to decreased police enforcement due to COVID. She said she was asking less about the budget and more about safety. There have been a lot of discussions and complaints about the fountain for example, that people are not stopping which is dangerous for pedestrians. Mr. Turley answered when the area went into lockdown, there was not much traffic so fewer speeding tickets were written and the City stopped writing parking tickets. He concluded parking fines, speeding tickets, reckless driving tickets, etc. were down which accounted for the decline in revenue. Councilmember Olson referred to transfers on that same page and asked what that means. Mr. Turley answered in expenditures, most of it was the $2 million transfer for Civic Field. Councilmember Olson referred to expenditures for the Mayor's Office and the Council Office, assuming the Council was lower because they are not attending seminars, etc. She asked why the Office of the Mayor was higher than budgeted. Mr. Turley answered with the change in mayor, the health benefits were different than what was budgeted. Councilmember Olson referred to the increase in Finance and asked if that was due to the severance package. Mr. Turley agreed it was the severance package. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 21 6.2.a Councilmember Olson referred to the Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance (page 46), noting expenditures were quite low. Recognizing there has been a lot of deferred maintenance, to the extent the money was budgeted, she personally would like to those projects accomplish as they will become more expensive by letting them go. Mr. Williams reiterated the last half of this year will include a tremendous amount of spending on capital renewal projects, much more than the first six months. That is partially due to COVID and some of it is just the timing of the projects. Mayor Nelson suggested in the future if the Council planned to ask staff to make estimations about expenses in particular departments, they give administration a heads up so the appropriate department representative could address those questions in advance. Councilmember Buckshnis appreciated having the time to vet this, pointing out the Finance Committee usually spends a lot of time on this, regardless of Council President Fraley-Monillas' thought that financials are mundane. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS:HZOOM.US/S/4257752525) Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. Aliza Fallon, Edmonds, referred to the Sound Transit grant for bike lanes. He works at a bike shop in Lynnwood; no one likes riding next to traffic because it's scary. A lot of people come to the shop asking for maps of the Edmonds, Seattle, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace area because they want to ride in protected or designated bike lanes. Adding bike lanes to Edmonds will bring in more people because they will feel safe riding there. Bicycles and e-bikes will lead the way for greener and cleaner transportation. He found it a bit ridiculous to forego moving toward a better, cleaner transportation system at the expense of a few parking spaces or as some have said, lowering property values. He expressed his support for the project. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, thanked the Council for honoring John Reed; she was honored to have know him and he continues to be a role model for all. She noted community engagement was a large topic at the Council retreat in early 2020. A real concern for nearly everyone was the issue of silos; silos between Mayor and Council, between Councilmembers, staff and administration and individual departments and greatest of all silos with citizens. The pandemic and subsequent lockdown has amplified silos; citizens are even more isolated, forced to use technology; virtual Zoom meetings do not really gather people together. A week ago the Council received pages of printed public comment; over 80%, most from residents in the 9t'', Bowdoin and Walnut neighborhoods, imploring the Council to delay or vote no on the Sound Transit sponsored project to add dedicated bike lanes to those streets. If people could gather in Council Chambers, she envisioned the Council would have heard over 21/2 hours of public comments with the Chambers packed to capacity which she said was public engagement. Ms. Dotsch expressed concern that the public's comments are not read publicly, just printed the Friday after the meeting, seemly a disservice to citizens. Considering that over 80% of citizens, those who are able to email who are truly personally impacted, many of whom are seniors or disabled and are negatively affected by this project are asking the Council to listen and at a minimum delay the vote so they can participate fully before a decision is made. If the Council votes to proceed, few changes will be made. Many Councilmembers were involved in public organizing on other issues such as marsh restoration, crumb rubber, pedestrian improvement, saving Brackett's Landing beach; if the Council tries to engage with COVID restrictions on gathering, only the people who have access to computers, internet and apps can participate. She requested the Council wait to make a decision until able to gather publicly. She recalled during campaigning, candidates said it would be different this time, they would listen and take up Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 22 6.2.a their concerns. In the end that seems like lip service because outside entities are telling them what is best for Edmonds. There are productive discussions to be had. Mike DeLilla, Seattle, City of Edmonds Senior Utilities Engineer, spoke in favor of the citywide bicycle improvements. The project is consistent with Ordinance 3842 regarding Complete Streets and adding bike lanes to all arterial and collector streets. It is also consistent with the 2015 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. With regard to routes, he has been a frequent rider and driver on the 100t' Street and Bowdoin routes for the last 10 years; 100t' is the only north -south road that can become a Complete Street. Expensive right-of-way acquisition would be required on 95' and 84'. With regard to the east -west route, he supported Walnut and Bowdoin. With regard to suggestions to use Main instead, he highly recommended not using Main because that hill is a category 3 or 4 for the Tour de France and a regular person would not ride it. With regard to parking, the vast majority of parking on those two alignments is unused most of the time. On 100t'', there is a huge 8-12 foot retaining wall on the east side and parking is only there because it's striped as such. He acknowledged there will be some sacrifices on that corridor, but goal is to share the road and the parking. He referred to the residents' targeted campaign that said staff s goal was to completely remove parking, not improve crossings, create dangers and that there would be no public engagement. That is very misleading and provides a platform for people to bring up their worst fears without having all the data. This project is early in the process and all those things will happen once the project moves forward. Margaret Elwood, Edmonds, said she was participating in the meeting to listen to the Council's deliberations. She expressed support for the bike lanes, commenting it would be unfortunate and incredibly short sighted to forego the grant funds for the bike lanes. As an advocate for bike lanes and a passionate bike rider, she encouraged the Council to support cyclists. Andrew Morgan, Edmonds, a resident on 9t' Avenue, said losing on -street parking is a real problem for reasons he expressed previously. Although there can be discussions about grant strategies, what happens on that street needs to be considered on a micro basis. The flyer that residents received mentioned a 50% reduction, but the outcry was because a lot of people would have the same problem that his wife and he will have. He and his neighbors are not opposed to bike lanes, but they want bike lanes where they make the most sense. To many of them, this feels like it is being imposed top down in a very authoritative manner. It is important to stop and get meaningful input from citizens and not just the professional opinions of staff. Nothing can take the place of taking a deep dive with the public and understanding what's at stake. COVID has turned everything upside down and more time is needed to find the best solution. He referred to the alternatives presented by Ms. Dotsch that include bike lanes that the community should discuss. He suggested an open house or outdoor meeting. He took a flight today and is currently on the other side of the United States; if people can get into planes, trains, buses, and ferries and maintain social distancing, surely there is a way to meet at City Hall. (Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmonds.wa.gov are attached.) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 28, 2020 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT 8. ACTION ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 7 Packet Pg. 23 6.2.a 1. WASTEWATER TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND TRANSPORT CONTRACT EXTENSION Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the City has had a very productive partnership with Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District (OVWSD) and the Ronald Wastewater District for about 32 years. The original agreement was signed in 1988 that extended through May 2018. About a year before it was to expire, it was obvious the ongoing service area dispute between OVWSD and Ronald over the possible Pt. Wells development would not be resolved, so the agreement was extended for two years in May 2017. That agreement expired in May 2019 and was extended to May 2020. Mountlake Terrace, OVWSD and Edmonds approved the new agreement but Ronald, which represents, 9.488% of the revenue to the system, said they could not sign until the final resolution of the lawsuit with OVWSD via a decision by Washington Supreme Court. It is unknow when that will occur or what the decision will say; the decision could resolve some issues and send it back to the original court which could take a while. Ronald, Mountlake Terrace, OVWSD have approved this 18 month extension. Approving the 18 month extension will lock in the 9.488% from Ronald under the old agreement and during the 18 months pendency, the money that will be borrowed this fall will be spent on the carbon recovery project at the WWTP. He was seeking Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement and extend it for 18 months. Councilmember Distelhorst observed the only thing that has changed in the agreement that was before Council on May 5th was the date; it was simply an extension. Mr. Williams agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled discussing this briefly during the gasification project for the WWTP. She asked if this will have any impact other than solidifying their position. Mr. Williams said it means all the partners are onboard and will pay their share of that project. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Supreme Court would determine who gets Pt. Wells. Mr. Williams answered yes. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Ronald's percentage would increase if Ronald gets Pt. Wells. Mr. Williams responded the capital percentage was locked in 1988 via the original agreement. The O&M changes slightly each year based on flows but the capital percentage is locked in. Ronald owns 9.488% of the available permitted capacity at the WWTP. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE MAYOR NELSON TO SIGN THE 18 MONTH CONTRACT EXTENSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. APPROVAL OF SOUND TRANSIT FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Works Director Phil Williams provided an introduction, explaining staff will provide some information from the previous presentation as well as new information in response to questions that have come up. City Engineer Rob English, Mr. Hauss and he are present to answer questions. Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss explained a letter was distributed to many residents living on Bowdoin and 100t' that contained some misinformation which was the reason for some of the negative comments. The letter stated the City's goal was to remove all the parking on those corridors which is incorrect; more parking studies will be conducted and not all parking will be removed. There will be multiple open houses in the future. He referred to a comment made last week that bike lanes have never been added in a residential stretch; he citied 76t' as part of the Bike2Health Project where bike lanes were added where there was single family and multifamily residential on both sides of the street and there has Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 8 Packet Pg. 24 6.2.a been no negative feedback. He summarized it had been done successfully in the past and he was confident it would be successful on these corridors. There was also mention of pedestrian safety; as part of this project staff will look into the possibility of adding mid -block pedestrian crossings so residents can cross from parking. Whether to retain the two northbound and southbound through lanes in Westgate will be reevaluated during the design phase. Mr. Hauss reviewed: • Introduction 0 2017: Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, and Lynnwood added bike lanes throughout the transportation system (through Bike-2-Health Secured Grant) with focus on north / central part of Edmonds (- 7 Miles of bike lanes in Edmonds). 0 2019: Sound Transit had a call for projects with the intent to improve active transportation access to their Sound Transit Stations (MLT Transit Station & Edmonds Station) o City secured $1.85 Million in grant funding(100% Sound Transit access grant / no local match). o All stretches identified in 2015 Transportation Plan (adopted by Council in 2015) o Proposed bike improvements with focus on south side and central part of Edmonds ■ 100'Ave W / 9t'Ave N ■ Bowdoin Way ■ 228th St SW and ■ 80th Ave W Project description - Map of citywide bicycle improvements (1 mile, %2 mile, t/4 mile of Edmonds Transit Center and Mountlake Terrace Transit Center) o Proposed sharrows o Proposed bike lane o Existing sharrows o Existing bike lane o Existing bike path Cross sections o 100th Ave W from 238th St. SW to north of SR-104 ■ Existing conditions with 2 travel lanes in each direction ■ Striping -only proposed section - Road diet (one lane in each direction with 2-way left turn lane and bike lanes) *Sections within signalized intersections (such as SR-104 @100t1i Ave W) to be reevaluated during design phase* Sharrow Markings (possible addition with SR-104 @ 100th Ave W) o Such markings to be added along stretches where travel lanes can't be removed. ■ Reminder to driver of potential bike activity. o The shared lane marking is intended to inform cyclists and motorists where a travel lane is shared by both modes. - Encourage safe passing of cyclist by motorist. - Assist cyclists with lateral positioning in a shared lane with on -street parallel parking in order to reduce the chance of a bicyclist impacting the DOOR OF PARKED VEHICLE. Photo of existing conditions with (2) travel lanes in each direction south of SR-104 Photo of proposed conditions with 2-way left turn lane and bike lanes (on 76th Ave W) Results from recent/similar conversion along 76t' Ave. W from 220th to 212th o Average daily traffic (ADT) ■ 76' Ave.: 11,500 vehicles per day ■ 100' Ave. W (south of SR-104): 9,000 vehicles per day ■ 100' Ave W (north of SR-104): 5,000 vehicles per day Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 9 Packet Pg. 25 6.2.a ■ Stretches with ADT less than 10,000 VPD are great candidates for road diets (source: FHWA) • Benefits for cyclist o Dedicated lane => improves safety for cyclists by providing a lane separated from vehicles o Cyclists more visible to motorist compared to when riding on sidewalk with sight distance obstructions o Pavement markings and signs will make motorist more aware of bike activity along each corridor o The increase in bike activity will make the cyclists more visible to the driver. • Vehicle Benefits (based on FHWA/Local studies) o Diagrams identifying conflict points on four lane undivided and three lane • Impacts to travel time o Minimal impacts to travel time (as shown (as shown when 76t' Ave. W conversion was completed from 220t' to OVD=> 2 1/4 mile stretch) ■ 313 seconds (26 mph) for NB movement to 332 seconds (25 mph) ■ 279 seconds (29 mph) for SB movement to 293 seconds (28 mph) o Reduce number of conflicts points (from 8 to 4) o Reduce speeds (8511i percentile reductions from 2 mph to 5 mph (based on various case studies completed across US) / more consistent pace • Safety Improvement for cross traffic (cross streets/driveways) o Can enter the mainline roadway more safely because there are fewer lanes to cross o Refuge area can be provided when accessing corridor (with two-way left turn lane) • Reduction in % of vehicle crashes from 19% to 47% ("road diets" / FHWA) o Parking can still be maintained in area with high parking demand (with removal of two-way left turn lane / to be considered upon studying left turn demand) o No impacts to emergency vehicles (actually easier to get through corridor) • Benefits for pedestrians o Bike lane provide buffer between sidewalk and travel lanes o Less travel lanes to cross at crosswalks • Benefits for entire transportation system o Supports complete streets policy (ECDC 18.80.015) o Many improvements for all modes o Improve gas emissions (improvements will get more drivers out of vehicles / onto bike to reach destination or bike to reach bus stop) • Existing cross section along 100t' from SR-104 to Walnut St & Bowdoin Way from 100t''to 84t'' o Proposed conditions with bike lanes on both side of street / parking on one side (parking alternating from one side of street to other) o Proposed conditions with one travel lane in each direction, a two-way left turn lane and bike lanes on both sides (with very low parking demand) • Bike accident summary (pre / post Bike-2-Health project) o (8) Minor injury cyclist collisions between 2012 -2017 (prior to completion of Bike-2-Health Proj ect) ■ (2) Along 212' St. SW between 72' Ave. W and 84t' Ave. W ■ (6) Along 76t1i Ave. W between 220t' St. SW And OVD - Cyclist hit by vehicle while riding on sidewalk => due to limited sight distance with fences/vegetation - Cyclist impact with open door of parked car - Cyclist going through hit turning vehicle o (0) Minor injury cyclist collisions between 2017 -2019 (after completion of Bike-2-Health project) ■ With increase in cyclist activity along those streets Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 10 Packet Pg. 26 6.2.a Bike accidents along proposed stretches between 2015 and 2019 o (4) Bike collisions along 100t1i Ave. W stretch and (1) along 228t' St. SW stretch ■ Cyclist hit while riding in sidewalk due to limited sight distance ■ Cyclists hit while going through by turning vehicle Parking information o 100' from SR-104 to Walnut St (# parking stalls occupied during mid -afternoon time period/ Source: Parking study and Google Maps August 2011 June 2015 Sept 2018 Sept 2019 July 2020 West side of stretch (-160 stalls) 11 (7%) 9 (6%) 9 (6%) 17 (10%) 9 (6%) East side of stretch (-130 stalls) 6 (5%) 2 (2%) 4 (3%) 6 (5%) 6 (5%) o Bowdoin Way from 91'' Ave S to 84' Ave W (# parking stalls occupied during mid -afternoon period / Source: Field Study & Good Maps) Sept 2018 Sept 2019 July 2020 North side of stretch (-220 stalls) 11 (5%) 18 (8%) 16 (7%) South side of stretch (-180 stalls) 3 (2%) 8 (6%) 4 (3%) o Additional parking studies to be completed during design phase to find high demand areas Mr. Williams said he drove both streets a couple times in the last week. Although the parking is not heavily used the majority of the time, a lot of additional space could be identified for parking in the after condition. The efficiency of the on -street parking on 9t' Avenue could also be dramatically improved by marking individual spaces such as was done downtown which resulted in about 20% more parking spaces. Mr. Hauss continued his presentation: 76t' @ 212t' Intersection (bike count from 7 am to 9 am and 4 pm to 6 pm) Date Total Bike Count (4 hour period) Notes 4/26/16 16 4/27/16 18 Avg 17 cyclist/4 hours in April ' 16 (pre Bike2Health Project) 4/28/16 18 8/30/16 23 8/31/16 25 9/1/16 32 10/17/17 7 10/18/17 9 Avg 7 cyclist/4 hours in October '17 (re Bike2Health Project) 10/19/17 6 4/23/19 13 4/24/19 43 Avg 28 cyclist/4 hours in April ' 19 (post Bike2Health Project) 4/25/19 29 7/16/19 17 7/17/19 24 7/18/19 25 9/17/19 21 9/18/19 43 Avg 32 cyclist/4 hours in Sept ' 19(post Bike2Health Project) 9/19/19 51 12/17/19 24 12/18/19 18 12/19/19 20 • 91 @ Walnut Intersection (bike county from 7 am to 9 am & 4 pm to 6 pm) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 11 Packet Pg. 27 6.2.a Date Total Bike Count (4 hourperiod) 4/26/16 11 4/27/16 8 4/28/16 8 8/30/16 17 8/31/16 6 9/1/16 6 6/27/17 15 6/28/17 18 6/29/17 18 10/17/17 7 10/18/17 7 10/19/17 6 4/23/19 9 4/24/ 19 6 4/25/19 5 7/16/19 17 7/17/19 16 7/18/19 8 9/17/19 6 9/18/19 21 9/19/19 10 12/17/19 2 12/18/19 6 12/19/19 0 Project Schedule o Design phase ■ Consultant selection process August 2020 ■ Start design September 2020 ■ Completion of design December 2021 o Construction phase ■ Start of construction April 2022 ■ Completion of construction December 2022 Note: If ROW phase is needed for roadway widening, construction could be pushed back one year • Support from other agencies o Edmonds Bicycle Advocacy Group (EBAG) o Cascade Bicycle Advocacy o City of Shoreline o City of Lynnwood o City of Mountlake Terrace o Community Transit o Edmonds School District • Conclusion o Approval of Sound Transit Agreement Councilmember Distelhorst expressed appreciation for the updated safety statistics and actual bike counts. Recognizing this was planned 5-6 years ago, he asked why these corridors were selected and why Main, 8' or other streets were not selected. He noted he had ideas as a rider but wanted to know from a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 12 Packet Pg. 28 6.2.a transportation engineer's viewpoint why the proposed streets worked better. Mr. Hauss answered they are the quickest route to the destination, linking existing facilities. He referred to alternate routes where the distance was longer, taking riders longer to reach their destination and where slopes were also an issue. He noted Main Street is a steep uphill slope, approximately 10%, and even on the downhill, a lot of riders are not comfortable going 35-40 mph. In comparison, Bowdoin is about 5%. In addition, at the top of Main there is a downhill and then additional elevation. Councilmember Distelhorst inquired about the design and outreach, whether it would include talking to neighbors and developing a design that incorporated their feedback. Mr. Williams answered staff s initial thought was to have a public meeting somewhere early in design, maybe at 10% when there are 21) sketches of the alternatives to vet those and present them to Council as well. The design process would then continue, doing as much as possible to be responsive to the comments. The intent would be to talk to the public early on and at least one other time during the design until a concept is developed and then the design becomes a more detailed process where finite details are worked out. With regard to why these corridors, Mr. Williams agreed these were the most direct routes and are significant transportation corridors where space for a significant transportation asset could be carved out. Bikes are not excluded from those roadways now, but there is a point at which the average daily volumes get so high that bicyclists are not comfortable. These streets are not in that category and could accommodate bike lanes nicely. It would be great if it was affordable to put a protected bike lane on SR- 104, but those funds are not available and likely could not be acquired. Councilmember Distelhorst commented sometimes the terms road diet and traffic calming can be abstract and residents have expressed concern with speeding. He asked staff to describe in laymen's terms how channelization and segmentation improvements improve safety for all road users. Mr. Williams said anything that a motorist sees in front of them whether it is a bicyclist, another car, pedestrians, narrowed lanes, a bike lane, markings on the road such as the sharrow markers, etc. will tend to slow cars down. It is an important aspect of how transportation engineers think. A road diet, particularly south of SR-104 with a center turn lane, will calm traffic speeds. The exact answer on 9t' between Walnut and the cemetery is unknown, whether there will be a center turn lane, will be determined in design and sussed out with the community. The solution could be two bike lanes and two travel lanes similar to 220t'', a very well used corridor. The center turn lane is not required, but it adds some nice features. It will be difficult with the amount of space in 44 feet to get two travel lanes of normal size, one lane of parking and two bike lanes, it does not quite fit. Mr. Hauss said the width on Bowdoin is 40 feet curb to curb with 20 foo wide travel lanes; striping will reduce speeds on that stretch. To understand the process that City staff went through, Councilmember Distelhorst asked whether Sound Transit gave the money to the City and said build bike lanes or was it a competitive grant that staff secured for the City. Mr. Hauss answered the City secured the grant via a competitive process with other agencies in Snohomish County that have Sound Transit stations within their city or in proximity. Mr. Williams said the City submitted three different concepts and this one was successful. Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated the explanation of how marking can increase parking efficiency by 20%. She reiterated her support of road diets; having taught teen drivers recently and recognizing the benefit of a center turn lane to increase safety. She recognized with COVID, there are more people out biking and she hoped with the addition of e-bikes that adding bike lanes and improving safety will encourage biking. That is especially significant in view of the item later on the agenda regarding updates to the Climate Action Plan. Councilmember Olson thanked staff for listening to the concerns and adding crosswalks to the plan as well as tick marks to pick up some of the lost parking. She lives off 9th and parking is always on her mind Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 13 Packet Pg. 29 6.2.a so she understood citizens' concerns. The community needs to be concerned about parking because people attend the City's numerous events because they can park easily. She was comforted that staff was thinking through those things, but she had not had the time as a Councilmember to have that communication with each citizen. There was an overwhelming amount of feedback from citizens and although she did not support waiting to proceed until a normal public hearing could be held, it was reasonable for the Council to take the time to consider the public's input. One of the days, the Council was bombarded with 100 emails. She has been able to keep up with the emails from previous days as well as some of the 100 but she has not been able to communicate with all those citizens and give them the opportunity to convince her otherwise, something that she felt she owed them. She asked for another week or two to vet all the citizen input and hoped other Councilmembers would do the same. Councilmember Olson asked whether the City was in jeopardy of losing the money if the Council took another week or two to vet this. Mr. Williams answered no, they money must be spent by 2024 so a week or two is not critical. He appreciated the Council allowing the Council Assistant to collate all the emails the Council received and providing staff a copy. He read all 41 pages as have Mr. English and Mr. Hauss. There was a lot of good commentary about issues people foresee with a project like this although unfortunately, some of it was based on misinformation. Additional meetings with residents early in design could further flesh out concerns and how they could be addressed. He recognized some of the issues can be addressed, some cannot; there is likely not a project that would have unanimous support especially from people who live on those streets. There has not been much commentary from residents in other areas of the City and he was confident many residents who do not live on 9', 100t' or Bowdoin or 228' would be interested in bike lanes. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has read everything, the comments are not favorable for the bike lanes on 100' Street SW/9' Avenue from Walnut to 244' and Bowdoin, 2 of the 4. She was not anti -bike lanes and as Mr. Morgan said, many people support bike lanes. She agreed 9r' Avenue and Bowdoin were the quickest routes but questioned whether they were the right routes. A majority of the residents who received the letter and live on those routes were not in favor of it. She asked how and who selected these routes and whether a portion of this could be approved and a more thorough open house held on that one section. Mr. Williams responded there are a lot of fine grain details in the emails that are particularly to 1- 2 addresses; when the design reaches the point of where to start and stop parking on one side of the street, having contact with individual residents could be worked into the process. If close to half of the parking is eliminated, it will be seen as a loss by some, but there are gains to be realized by the City at large. Bicycling is already slow, cyclists are doing something positive by getting out of their cars, reducing emissions, getting exercise, and staying healthy; he questions whether they should be punished by pushing them onto side streets where they are not seen and their trip will take longer. That doesn't seem quite right if there is room for bike lanes and enough parking can be retained. If only 5-10% of the parking is used in non-COVID years, if half the spaces are eliminated, only 20% of the parking available on the street is being used, which leaves 4 out of 5 parking spaces unused. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was not all about parking. She did not like Mr. Williams' opinion about pushing bikes to some other street. She provided the example of Portland, Oregon, where they spent two years doing an extensive bike lane process and they chose a residential area to move the bikers through which was slower but safer. She referred to the statement that bike lanes provide a buffer between cars and pedestrians, noting she was just trying to ensure this is vetted correctly. In her opinion there was not enough information to determine that this was the best route for citizens and bicycles. She questioned if a vehicle count had been done to determine the number of cars traveling on 9t'', commenting when she drives it at 5:00 it is backed up. A variety of things have been brought up that are unrelated to parking. She was interested in a better understanding of the alternates and why they did not work; sometimes a better route is a safer route. Westgate is a dangerous intersection, 9t' Avenue is always busy, and Yost is Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 14 Packet Pg. 30 6.2.a always busy when the pool is open. She suggested approving this but not approving those two areas until there was a better vetting of potential alternatives. Mr. Williams responded the other side streets are even narrower and a lot of them do not have sidewalks so there would not be a dedicated bike lane, only painted sharrows. Westgate is a huge designation and bikes cannot reach it via 96th or 95th because bikes cannot effectively travel east -west on SR-104 so the only way to reach Westgate is 100t1i and 9t''. It is the right route, but the details of how to make it work for everyone needs to be worked through. Councilmember Buckshnis said 7th and 8th are very large streets; she preferred the Council had other alternatives to consider in making an informed decision. She agreed bike lanes are needed and bicycling supports climate change but everyone needs to be conscious of safety and that there is major traffic coming in/out of Edmonds. When driving neighbor at 5:00, it takes her 15 minutes to reach a place 4 minutes from her house. Mr. Williams said the traffic count on 9th north of SR- 104 peak is about 5,000/day and 500 during the PM peak hours. The road diet on 76t' turned out very well and the traffic volume there is 11,000 vehicles/day. He understood it was a balance between modes of travel, but is not a traffic issue but figuring out how to prioritize various users within the curb lines. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Ms. Dotsch's comments about 76t' and turning toward Perrinville where the bike lanes ends because Lynnwood installed a turn lane. She favoring having a more robust discussion with citizens in determining whether this is the accurate route. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she lives off 76' where the traffic volume is 10,000 cars/day. She recalled there was a lot of pushback when the bike lanes were installed on 76', including from her, due to concern there would not be enough space and it would be too dangerous. There are only bike lanes on one side of 76' for most of way, and two for the last 3-4 blocks before Highway 99 which has worked out just fine. She commented this is the third time this has been on agenda; the Council approved the bike lane route 2-3 years ago so she was comfortable moving ahead. The Council has been told they will have input on the design and moving forward. She referred to multiple letters from the Sierra Club regarding bike lanes and how much better bikes are for transit. She has begun biking herself recently and learned that safety is the top priority for the biking community. Council President Fraley-Monillas expressed concern with the misinformation that was distributed door to door on 9t' Avenue. The letter encourages residents to get involved, because if no residents speak up, the City's goal is likely no parking will remain on 9` Avenue. She noted that was not accurate; one side of the street for most of the stretch will have parking. Someone dropping off scary letters to the residents on 9t' Avenue was inappropriate. She acknowledged there wasn't parking on both sides on 76t'', but there is parking on one side. She received multiple emails, one from a citizen complaining they will not have anywhere to park their eight vehicles. The roads belong to the City, not to individual citizens. The City's codes state homes have to have a certain amount of parking on site. With regard to this being a dangerous areas, Council President Fraley-Monillas said she understood there was a lot of traffic at Westgate but there is more traffic on 76th and 205t1i where there are bike lanes. When leaving her neighborhood, sometimes cars are backed up 2-3 blocks from 205t' trying to get through the light. The bike lanes on 76t' are constantly used in both directions. She encouraged the Council to pass this tonight and to continue to stay involved in the design to ensure the design on 100t' and 9t' Avenue is done in a way that protects citizens and bikes. She recalled a cyclist who called her to describe riding on 9th and someone opening a car door caused them bike to swerve into traffic. Councilmember Olson referred to a comment she received expressing concern with adding traffic at the Yost Park intersection, people come from out of town do not recognize it as an actual intersection, making it inherently dangerous. She asked if the proposed project would improve the safety of that intersection or would City funds be necessary, noting the intersection will only become less safe by Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 15 Packet Pg. 31 6.2.a adding more cyclists. Mr. Williams said staff could commit to looking at that intersection. He did not realize there were issues with confusion; perhaps better signage/markings could be installed to better identify the intersection. Anything more elaborate that changes curb lines or puts in physical improvements would cost money and that is not in the grant. Mr. Hauss said there were comments about vegetation obscuring the stop signs which have been addressed. To address a concern with the curve before the stop sign westbound, an advisory "stop sign ahead" sign was added recently. Additional evaluation of that intersection could be done during the design phase. With regard to the flyer that was distributed, Councilmember Olson said the misinformation that all the parking would be removed was a problem because it was not true and 50% was big difference between none. She recalled Mr. Williams mentioned zigzagging areas of parking so it is better for residents on both sides instead of having it all on one side or the other. She thanked the person who distributed the flyer because although it contained misinformation, it provided a great service and she hoped the City would do something similar in the future with accurate information to bring people to the table. She offered to personally distribute flyers along with other volunteers and other Councilmembers. She requested one more week to be able to talk to everyone who contacted her instead of voting tonight. Councilmember Paine said the discussion with Council, comments from the community, testimony, phone calls and emails have been very helpful. Last year she spent a lot of time on 9t' doorbelling and she used to live on 14t' Street SW off 100th so she is very familiar with the neighborhood's concerns with traffic, parking and bicycles. One person voiced tremendous concern about the speed of traffic particularly at the intersection of 9th & Walnut and into downtown. Having bike lanes and raising visibility for other modes of transportation will help the biking and pedestrian community. There have been some very visible, tragic pedestrian incidents including a couple deaths in these neighborhoods in recent years. She was gratified to hear staff plans to go out to the community; if the Housing Commission can hold a community open house, a targeted bike lane discussion can occur. Parking versus bikes will always be a major discussion point, but the roads belong to the City and the rights -of -way need to be managed for all users. Complete Streets describes sharing the streets and Edmonds adopted Complete Streets 15-20 years ago. She concluded adding bikes to the mix will help drivers slow down and recognize that others are using the street. The main thoroughfare between 100th from Firdale and from SR-104 to Walnut and up Bowdoin as well as on 8t' Avenue can be racetrack. She appreciated the information, feedback and information she has received on this topic. Councilmember K. Johnson thanked Mr. Hauss for applying for the $1.85 million grant, an opportunity to implement the bicycle element of the Transportation Plan adopted by the City Council. She was heartened that the Council had heard from over 100 people; they seem to be in two groups, 1) residents who live adjacent to the proposed bike lanes who are concerned about parking, and 2) citizens who are bike riders and would love to see more safe access. There are basically three levels of bike facilities, 1) protected like the Burke Gilman or the Interurban Trail, 2) a bicycle lane, and 3) riding with traffic. Bicycle lanes where there are wide streets make sense. She lives off Bowdoin Way and has ridden her bike there; the 5% grade is doable, but she would not want to ride up Main Street. Councilmember K. Johnson said the roadway is a public asset, it belongs to the City and is wide enough to accommodate bike lanes and perhaps some parking. There is no expectation that private parking is a right for an adjacent landowners. If the roadway design is changed, residents' parking needs will have to be accommodated elsewhere. The comments have revealed there are some hot spots including 5 Corners, Westgate, and Yost Park, areas that can be looked at in greater detail. This contract allows $350,000 for design and up to $500,000. The Council is not being asked to design the bike lanes or to eliminate all the parking. This provides a year to design and study it in greater detail; a process that has a great start due to the 100 people who have contacted the City. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 16 Packet Pg. 32 6.2.a Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out that although Sound Transit is providing $1.85 million, it will be a City project. The City will oversee the design and decide what public involvement is appropriate and can bring it back to City Council for final approval. She supported the project, having long felt there was excess capacity and an opportunity to build bike lanes in this area. The Council needs to be responsive to citizens, but this isn't the last step; this is only the beginning. She was willing to give Councilmembers extra time if they needed it to be comfortable, but she was ready to approve the funding agreement tonight. Councilmember Distelhorst suggested Mayor Nelson be provided an opportunity to comment. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, the Mayor must ask permission from the entire Council in order to speak; it is not something an individual Councilmember can request. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO ALLOW MAYOR NELSON TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, asking if the Council could finish their discussion first. Council President Fraley-Monillas said Mayor Nelson is part of the discussion and every Councilmember has already spoken. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Mayor Nelson expressed support for staff s proposal and for bike lanes in the City, agreeing that community involvement throughout the process is helpful. Unfortunately in this instance the community outreach was not done by the City first in a way that reached the people who feel they are the most impacted. Moving forward, it will be important to reach out to everyone who is impacted, understanding it is not just the people who live there or the people who bike through there, it is a citywide benefit. Staff has done an outstanding job of applying for and obtaining the grant and have been very clear that they will seek input on the design from the public which will undoubtedly influence the design. This is not the end but the beginning of the bike lane project. Councilmember Buckshnis said the bike lanes have not been vetted by the public other than the flyer and the emails that the Council received. The City has $350,000 for design; there are 4 stretches the City has identified. She believed the citizens and the City should be allowed to have open communication to determine alternates for 100t' and the Westgate area. On average, one out of ten emails supported the bike lanes; she supports bike lanes but did not feel the four choices staff suggested had been vetted. She will approve the project if the two stretches can be removed and alternatives proposed. She summarized there had not been adequate interaction with citizens on the Westgate section, 100' & SR-104, 9t' Avenue, and Walnut & Bowdoin. She reiterated she supported bike lanes. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SYSTEMS ACCESS PROJECT AGREEMENT INCLUDING HAVING OPEN HOUSES FOR DESIGN. Councilmember Olson said she will abstain if the Council votes tonight. She requested the Council move the vote to the next Council meeting so she can participate in the vote. Council President Fraley-Monillas said this has been discussed at three meetings and Councilmembers have had an opportunity to reach out to those who have contacted them. She was not interested a further delay. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND TO REMOVE THE BIKE LANE STRETCH FROM 100TH STREET SOUTHWEST/9TH Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 17 Packet Pg. 33 6.2.a AVENUE SOUTH FROM WALNUT STREET TO 244TH STREET SOUTHWEST, TO BE REVIEWED FOR ANOTHER ALTERNATE. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has read all the comments the Council received and has had multiple discussions with people. It would be advantageous in a public process just like Marina Beach Park to engage citizens before selecting the routes. Council President Fraley-Monillas encouraged Councilmembers not to support this amendment because there will be further discussion regarding the design. She was not interested in citizens having a say about the design of one stretch; citizens should have input into the design of all the stretches of the bike lanes. Councilmember Paine supported having an abundance of discussion during the design phase at 10% as Mr. Williams stated and also at 30% design to look at parking and the bike lane design. She encouraged maximum safety in all the designs which includes the most direct routes, but she would leave it to professional engineers who put this together. AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES. Councilmember Olson said she did not have time to vet all the comments although she is working diligently on it and would like to postpone the vote until August 11'. She wanted an opportunity for citizens to convince her that she was wrong or she would vote her gut feeling that this was a positive, but she wanted to hear everyone. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO POSTPONE THE VOTE TO AUGUST 11TH Council President Fraley-Monillas reiterated the Council has had three weeks to consider this in addition to the year or two since it was approved. She encouraged the Council to move forward, emphasizing there will be an opportunity to have a say in the design as the project moves forward. Councilmember Olson pointed out the Council was committing to the routes based on this vote. It is relevant to hear and communicate with citizens who are concerned these are not the right routes. She said the first time this was on the Council agenda, the Council did not have the citizen input. Councilmember Buckshnis said she will support any Councilmember who needs more time. This has been on the agenda for a long time and everyone supports bike lanes. The Council has received about 150 emails over the last two days and it takes a lot of time to review them. She responded to 95 emails over the weekend and has since received more emails. She has listened to what the public wants which is more public involvement. Council President Fraley-Monillas said discussion at three meetings was enough for her. She was interested in the design which will identify any issues on the routes. She encouraged Councilmembers not to support the amendment. Councilmember Distelhorst agreed it had not been easy, he has replied to every email and tried to have that engagement. He has also offered to meet in person with people on Bowdoin and 9th who have had concerns but so far no one wants to meet in person. He was confident that staff will be able to engage with the public during the design phase. He was unaware of any new information that would come out in the next seven days. Councilmember K. Johnson said she was prepared to vote tonight, but if a Councilmember requests more time, she is happy to give it. This item can always be put on the Consent Agenda next week. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 18 Packet Pg. 34 6.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas appreciated Councilmember K. Johnson's thoughts but not want to discuss it a fourth time in four weeks. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON AMENDED HER AMENDMENT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO PUT IT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA NEXT WEEK INSTEAD OF VOTING TONIGHT. Councilmember Paine said next week is committee meetings, therefore there would need to be a special meeting. Councilmember Olson commented that has been done the last two months and asked if there was a reason it could not be done next week. Council President Fraley-Monillas commented the Council is not getting a lot of work done because Councilmembers keep bringing stuff back. Three weeks to discuss this is plenty of time and putting it on Consent next week will not change anything; there will not be any more information, it will just allow one Councilmember the opportunity to contact people which other Councilmembers have already done. She did not contact everyone, but contacted as many as she could. She was willing to move forward and use the opportunity during the design phase for citizens to provide input. Councilmember Olson pointed out she did not know what new information might come from the conversations and that is the whole point of having them. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS CALLED THE QUESTION. THE VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Olson restated the motion: TO PUT THIS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE AUGUST 111h MEETING INSTEAD OF VOTING TONIGHT AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4) COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON, BUCKSHNIS AND K. JOHNSON VOTING YES. Council President Fraley-Monillas restated the main motion: TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SYSTEMS ACCESS PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE CITIZEN INPUT IN THE DESIGN. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-0-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON ABSTAINING. Councilmember Olson raised a point of order, whether Councilmembers were supposed to state their reason for abstaining. Mayor Nelson said they were not. 3. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ECC 2.10.010 FOR COUNCIL REVIEW OF APPOINTIVE POSITIONS HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson advised this is continued discussion of a proposed code amendment that allow an exception to the three candidate pool and allows the Mayor to request Council approve his bringing forward a single candidate for appointment. During the last presentation, there was a lack of clarity regarding the difference between the two amendments. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 19 Packet Pg. 35 6.2.a In 8.3.b (packet page 232), Section D of this code amendment provides an additional exception to the three candidate rule that is currently in code and would allow the Mayor to request approval to move forward one candidate for confirmation by the Council, which requires passage by a super majority. The other proposed code amendment, 8.3.a (packet page 227) Section F also addresses some conflicting language between the expectation that recruiting begin 30 days after there is a vacancy. Section F provides if the Mayor has put in place an acting director for that vacancy, the expectation is not that recruiting would begin within 30 days. By the fourth month of that acting directorship, the Mayor would either need to request the exception of Council or begin recruiting. If Council approves the amendment to allow for the additional exception, it would not make sense to begin recruiting in 30 days if the Mayor is taking the opportunity to evaluate that candidate. Ms. Neill Hoyson highlighted another small change in Section B (packet page 228) that addresses the question of the continuance of an acting appointment. The code language indicates when an acting appointment lapses, the position is considered to be vacant. The Mayor then has the authority to appoint to a vacant position without Council confirmation. The amendment in this section makes it clear that the intent is any subsequent appointments to an acting directorship would require Council approval even if there had been a lapse and the position was now called a vacant position. Ms. Neill Hoyson explained after last week's discussion, some Councilmembers expressed concern with the permanent feeling of code changes to address the current recruiting issues with an acting director and moving the police chief position forward and whether that could be accomplished in a less permanent way. Mr. Taraday and she discussed that today and unfortunately the only way to accomplish it is through a code change, but Council could choose to put a sunset on that change in the code to clearly recognize that part of the issue is related to the current environment where recruitment for a position may not elicit a pool of candidates given there may be less mobility of candidates during a pandemic. A sunset date would tie the code change to the current conditions and that the code section would sunset in a certain time period. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the title of the ordinance was also amended to add "for a limited period of time" based on 8.3.b but the same change could be made to either of the two versions in the packet. A new whereas clause was also added that reads, "Whereas, such an exception is especially appropriate now, during the COVID-19 pandemic, because the administration anticipates that the pandemic would make it difficult to recruit a sufficient number of qualified candidates." The new sunset provision described by Ms. Neill Hoyson would be inserted as Section 2, "Sunset Provision. This ordinance shall be in effect for one year from the effective date described herein. On the one year anniversary of the effective date it shall cease to have effect." The remaining sections would be renumbered. Councilmember Olson said she liked the idea of a sunset clause and was interested in adding that. She suggested those who made amendments last week may want to redo them if the Council plans to proceed with one of the options. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed a lot of citizens have contacted her regarding this. She is confused and asked whether the recruiting process had started, recalling Ms. Neill Hoyson and the consultant made a presentation to Council in January. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered recruiting is a very broad term in HR; to a lot of people that means posting a job, but a lot of work occurs prior to posting a position. That was the work that had been conducted with the consultant; analysis of the current job description, analysis of the current department challenges, creating a candidate profile, and establishing a marketing plan and materials. The position was very close to being posted when the pandemic broke out and the question arose whether it was reasonable to expect if the City began searching for candidates that a viable pool of candidates would apply given what was going on. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 20 Packet Pg. 36 6.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis asked Ms. Neill Hoyson if she was told in March not to do anything because under the governor's OPMA provisions searching for a police chief was not routine and necessary, or did recruiting just stop. Ms. Neill Hoyson said recruiting was paused and the consultant informed. The consultant agreed it was not a good time to move forward. During that subsequent 30 day time period, the consultant paused the process and discussions began about appointing a single candidate, Jim Lawless, as the chief. At that point, Mr. Taraday determined discussion about changing the code to allow for an exception for a single candidate did not fit the parameters of what was allowed for legislative bodies to discuss during that time period. Mr. Taraday said he still maintains that an amendment of this type did not meet the attorney general's guidance regarding what was necessary and routine under the governor's order. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out that ended in May and she questioned why the Council was discussing this in August and whether it had taken so long was due to COVID. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered COVID was certainly the reason for pausing the recruitment and the cause of the OPMA restrictions and legal counsel's direction that discussion regarding the code changes could not occur during that time period. Once the OPMA restrictions were lifted, there were discussions with the Mayor about how he wanted to move forward and once that was finalized, it was brought to Council. This is the third week Council has discussed this so it was added to agenda about 4-5 weeks ago which is only a 3 week gap. Councilmember Paine asked for clarification, that the sunset language would remove all the amendments from the code that have been in existence since 2015. Mr. Taraday answered the sunset clause would only erase the amendments that the Council is about to make. Whatever the final version of the ordinance looks like after the Council makes any amendments, if that final version also includes a sunset clause, it just means that version of the ordinance including all of tonight's amendments would go away a year after the effective date and the code would essentially revert back to the way it reads today. Councilmember K. Johnson asked who is responsible for enforcing the code, whether it was the HR director, the mayor or the attorney. Mr. Taraday said he does not have enforcement authority and he not sure what Councilmember K. Johnson mean by enforcement authority. Councilmember K. Johnson said the code the Council is being asked to change states the mayor shall begin recruitment of candidates to fill vacant appointive offices no later than 30 days after the latter of two City Council actions described in subsection A and C of this section, provided..." which she felt was unclear. She was trying to figure out who was supposed to do the recruitment and the appointment for this position. Her reading of the code indicates it should have been done within the first 30 days prior to COVID. She asked who was responsible for ensuring the code is in fact followed. Mr. Taraday said he did not have all the facts related to the dates at his disposal. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out this is August so it was not done during the first 30 days. Mr. Taraday said in his conversation with Ms. Neill Hoyson, she and Mayor Nelson commenced recruitment early in 2020. He did not know the exact dates but he was uncertain there was a delay in the initial recruitment. Ms. Neill Hoyson said there was no delay, recruitment began in January. As stated earlier, recruiting is a very broad term in the HR lexicon, a lot occurs prior to a position being posted. In the case of the police chief vacancy, it begin with discussions with Mayor Nelson regarding the best way to approach this recruitment, whether it should be done in-house or utilize a recruiting consultant. Once that decision was made, work had to be done to develop proposals and to retain a consultant. That all began in January so recruitment did begin within 30 days of the vacancy. Councilmember L. Johnson said similar to last week, for her it was about policy, procedure and legislative oversight. The Council is making changes to accommodate one position. Unfortunately, this has been allowed to become very personal and that is not how the Council should be legislating. She Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 21 Packet Pg. 37 6.2.a supported moving forward with the process and allow candidates to come forward and be duly appointed and confirmed following the processes and procedures. Councilmember K. Johnson said normally she would agree the Council should follow procedures and code without question. However, the City is in a situation where there has been an acting police chief for eight months which she found very unfair. She was of two minds, 1) she was very supportive of Acting Police Chief Lawless, and 2) felt the City needed to follow procedures. Lynnwood's code, which she sent to everyone and asked Mr. Taraday to review, includes an opportunity for the Council to modify the number of applicants based on justification that is acceptable to the Council. Additionally, the final results of the background checks are done prior to Council confirmation, all appointed employees are subject to Council confirmation, and a review of documents submitted is allowed Council consideration. She summarized Edmonds' code is obtuse, convoluted, and making a change now makes it worse even if a sunset clause is added. Edmonds' code is three pages and Lynnwood's code is only one page. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO CONSIDER STREAMLINING THE PROPOSAL SUBJECT TO COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE LYNNWOOD PROPOSAL AND THE THIRD PROPOSAL THAT OUR ATTORNEY HAS PRESENTED. Councilmember K. Johnson restated motion: THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER A THIRD ALTERNATIVE WHICH WAS DRAFTED BY OUR CITY ATTORNEY THAT INCORPORATES A MUCH MORE STREAMLINED EXAMPLE BASED ON THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD'S APPOINTIVE PROCESS. Councilmember Olson said she liked the simplicity of Lynnwood's code. [The remainder of Councilmember Olson's comments were not recorded due to a technical difficulty.] Councilmember Paine said she had an opportunity to review Lynnwood's code and had concerns about the way Lynnwood does things. She was not looking at their code with an eye toward adopting it but to compare and contrast. She is still left with ultimately feeling like this not something that needs to be resolved today and not something the Council asked for. She was hopeful the administration could develop a solution that did not include a code change. It was frustrating to be put in this position, swapping horses midstream. Although everyone is well intentioned, she was hopeful there was a simpler solution and when the appointive hires are completed, she would welcome having this code change come through the normal process such as the personnel committee and to consider better options. She hoped there could be an agreeable solution that did not include an ordinance change. She liked how Lynnwood's code was written as it was a lot clearer, but she did not like everything about it. Councilmember Olson said in effect the sunset clause does what Councilmember Paine said she wants to see. Councilmember Paine raised a point of order, stating she objected to having her words used and that was not what she meant. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken. Councilmember Olson said in her judgment the proposed sunset clause gives the Council the ability to use it in this circumstance without permanently altering the code and provides an opportunity to alter the code later. She was in favor of the sunset clause and whatever code the Council ended up choosing. She was hopeful the Council would approve a modification to the code tonight. Council President Fraley-Monillas commented there are two issues that are being intermixed, 1) the mayor's wish to appoint Mr. Lawless to the permanent position, and 2) to change the code to reflect bringing less than three candidates to Council for confirmation. She was opposed to taking away the Council's authority for whatever reason when it comes to an appointment of a director regardless of the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 22 Packet Pg. 38 position. She understood the purpose of the sunset clause, but she felt creating a clause due to COVID was a mistake. She has contacted other cities such as Everett and Tukwila who are hiring director level positions and they are still able to get three candidates to interview due to the loosening of the OPMA restrictions by the governor. She preferred the policy not be changed because she was not willing to release the Council's authority to make an ordinance change based on an emotional response to hiring someone or based on a pandemic when several names can move forward. She recommended retaining the existing policy and perhaps amending it later to be clearer. She supported moving forward with the Mayor bringing forth names, having no doubt he would be able to present three names and if Chief Lawless was the best, she was all for it. She concluded changing things at this point due to COVID when other cities are able to hire was concerning to her. Councilmember Buckshnis asked Ms. Neill Hoyson about next steps. For her, it was not an emotional response; for some reason someone dropped the ball and what has happened to Mr. Lawless was an embarrassment to City. Ms. Neill Hoyson said after the last Council meeting when no changes to code passed, she moved forward as if the current code were in place and she sent the Mayor an outline of the proposed process for recruiting for the police chief. If no changes are made today, she will continue with that process. Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the timeframe. Ms. Neill Hoyson said she could not provide a specific timeframe tonight. Given the legwork that has been done, it is potentially a 2-3 month time period for having final candidates. Councilmember K. Johnson commented the Council is definitely not discussing her motion. She restated the motion: THAT THE COUNCIL CONSIDER A THIRD PROPOSAL THAT WAS DRAFTED BY OUR ATTORNEY TO CONSIDER A MORE STREAMLINED PROCESS THAT WOULD INCORPORATE ALL OF OUR CONCERNS AND IT'S BASED ON THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD. Councilmember Distelhorst questioned what "consider" meant, whether it mean to consider voting tonight, whether to consider looking at it long term, etc. Councilmember K. Johnson said because it is a third alternative, she was asking that the Council not vote on it tonight but look at it next week. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not support this as she believes the Council should move forward and get it going because Chief Lawless has done a stellar job, she is not emotional and the Council just needs to march forward although she knew how the votes would go. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis although she did not know how the votes would go. She agreed with continuing to move forward. She thanked Ms. Neill Hoyson for the work she has done on this. Councilmember Olson said she has had time to look at Lynnwood's code, and felt it was better than the City's existing code and was a code she wanted the City to have long term. She supported voting on this option and pursuing Lynnwood's code next week. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Olson suggested passing one of the two remaining ordinances in the packet on this subject, ordinance 8.3.b, and after that vote, have debate and a conversation about which one if it passes. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO VOTE TO PASS ORDINANCE 8.3.B. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 23 Packet Pg. 39 6.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas encouraged Councilmembers to vote no. She preferred to get three candidates and did not think the City's codes or policies regarding the hiring of a very important position should be changed due to COVID. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, K. JOHNSON, AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE TAKE UP THE REVISION OF THE CITY CODE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson, but did not know if it was appropriate right now as there were a lot of codes that needed to be updated. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that now is not the time. If the Council could hold separate meetings, she questions why committee meetings were not being held. It may be reasonable if the Council can return to committee meetings for all three committees. Mr. Taraday said there is nothing preventing the Council from having regular committee meetings. Council President Fraley-Monillas said if the Council is willing and ready to return to three committee meetings, she had no problem with Councilmember K. Johnson's motion. Otherwise, the process itself could be dealt with once the COVID issue is over. Councilmember K. Johnson commented the Council has been meeting as a committee of the whole which includes all three committees. That meeting should not be populated with only Public Works items but items that also generally come to Finance and Personnel Committee. She was not saying it needed to be on the agenda next week, but it was an issue that deserved to be cleaned up because it has been a real mess. Councilmember Distelhorst appreciated Councilmember K. Johnson's approach, commenting it feels like a fog has conflated the code with a personnel decision and it would be appropriate to keep the policy issue separate from the personnel issue. Councilmember K. Johnson's approach would give him a clear head to separate those issues and think about them independently. Councilmember Buckshnis was not in favor of holding individual committee meetings during COVID and via Zoom due to the logistics. Many people are watching and they enjoy the committee of the whole. She disagreed with Mr. Taraday that although it may be okay, logically it would be very difficult. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO ADDRESS ONE ITEM UNTIL 10:20 P.M. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the Council code of Conduct will need to be postponed to a future meeting and the presentation regarding the Climate Goals Project should occur as there are people waiting to speak on that. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. Council President Fraley-Monillas said if the Personnel Committee plans to meet, she encouraged the Council to meet in separate committees. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, there is a consultant waiting to make the presentation on Climate Goals Project. Council President Fraley-Monillas said there is a motion on the floor so discussion about the Personnel Committee was proper. Mayor Nelson agreed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 24 Packet Pg. 40 6.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas said if the Council plans to hold a Personnel Committee meeting, the Council needs to hold meetings for all three committees. If the Council approves Councilmember K. Johnson's motion, she will support holding meetings for all three committees. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION BASED ON THE ABOVE COMMENT. Council President Fraley-Monillas restated the amendment: IF WE'RE GOING TO BREAK INTO THE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING, THERE IS NO REASON WHY WE CAN'T HAVE FINANCE AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEES MEET INDEPENDENTLY. WE HAVE FIGURED OUT A WAY TO DO IT SO THEY'RE ALL THREE ON ZOOM. Councilmember K. Johnson said that was never her intent. The Council is meeting as a committee of the whole and that is how the Council decided it wants to proceed. Her intent was this was an appropriate topic for the committee of the whole on a future agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. STUDY ITEMS 1. UPDATE ON CLIMATE GOALS PROJECT Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien and Mark Johnson, PSA. She said sustainability and protecting the climate is a priority for Council and many members of community. Mark Johnson, PSA, reviewed: Inventory Results o Local Emissions (305,962 MT CO2e 7.2 MT CO2e per capita ■ Transportation 40% ■ Buildings (residential) 35% ■ Buildings (commercial) 15% ■ Buildings (industrial) 2% ■ Refrigerant Loss 6% ■ Waste 2% o Graph of Local emissions + household consumption -related emissions (imported) ■ Emissions from the production of imported food, goods, and energy consumed by the Edmonds community are larger than sources of local emissions Strategies and Policy Gaps o Reviewed City planning and policy documents o Found over 300 measures that pertain to climate action o Recommended 6 new measures under existing categories (Transportation, Land Use, and Buildings) o Added a new category —Wastewater with 4 measures recommended 10 Strategies to Track CAP Strategy Metric TR-1 Additional Units in Commercial and Multi -Family Centers by 2035 and 2050 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 25 Packet Pg. 41 6.2.a Number of housing units built in activity centers TR-2 Percent of Commuters Using Transit by 2035 and 2050 Percentage of commuters using public transportation (avoided VMT) TR-3 Percent of Commuters Walking or Biking to Work by 2035 and 2050 Percentage of commuters using an active mode of transportation (avoided VMT). TR-4 Percent of Commuters Carpooling and/or Utilizing an Alternate Work Week by 2035 and 2050 Percentage of commuters carpooling, telecommuting, and/or working shorter weeks and longer hours (avoided VMT). TR-5 Percent of Electric Vehicles by 2035 and 2050 Percentage of Citywide fleet that is BEV and PHEV (avoided VMT). W-1 Reduction in Solid Waste Generation by 2035 and 2050 Change in amount of solid waste generated per capita as compared to 2017 levels EY-1 Number of New Residential and Commercial Solar PV Systems Installed by 2035 and 2050 Number of homes and businesses that installed solar PV since 2017 EY-2 Percent of Residential and Commercial Area Retrofitted by 2035 and 2050 The total residential and commercial area (in square feet) that is upgraded with energy efficiency programs/ opportunities. Savings from 2017 Improvements to Wastewater Treatment Plant Amount of electricity and fuel oil saved from 2017 efficiency improvements to wastewater treatment plant EY-3 Percent of New, LEED-Certified Residential and Commercial Development by 2035 and 2050 Percentage of new development since 2017 that is built LEED-certified EY-4 Number of Trees Planted by 2035 and 2050 Number of trees planted citywide since 2017 Reductions by Sector o GHG Reductions by Inventory Sector —Progress Toward 2035 Target ■ Graph comparing 2017 emissions and reductions by sector: energy, transportation, waste, target gap and remaining footprint in 2035 Addressing the gap o The 10 strategies are not the only actions the City plans to take o Largest gaps projected for Transportation and Residential Energy o Market forces, and federal and state regulations will help ■ Federal automobile fuel efficiency standards will reduce GHG emissions per vehicle mile traveled ■ State Clean Energy bills will decarbonize the state electric grid by 2050, and continue incentives ■ All auto manufacturers are expanding electric vehicle production, driven by European and Asian markets ■ Solar power costs are expected to continue to fall ■ Heat pumps already cost less than gas furnaces to operate ■ Sequestration technology is being developed Setting a Science -Based Target Science -based Targets Celsius 10 1.50 2° Fahrenheit 1.80 2.70 3.60 o A science -based climate target sets a rate of climate action that is aligned with keeping average global temperature increases below a specified level of increase compared to pre- industrial temperatures. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 26 Packet Pg. 42 6.2.a o Keeping global temperature increases below 2°C will allow the majority, but not all, of the global population to avoid the worst social and economic effects of climate change (Paris Agreement) o The average temperature of the earth is approximately 1.2°C higher today than at the beginning of the industrial revolution. What are the options? What rates of GHG reduction are required: Target +1.0°C 350 m +1.5°C 400 pm +2.0°C 450 ppm Average Annual Rate of Reduction to Meet Target (rounded) 8% 1 5% 1 2% Annual Reduction compared to 2010 values are rounded for simplicity) By 2020: 15% 13% 10% By 2030: 70% 50% 35% B 2050: 100% 100% 80% Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: • Climate Target Resolution o Mayor's Climate Protection Committee recommended 1.5°Celsius as a target for the City of Edmonds o A draft resolution to formally recognize this target is included in the Council packet o The resolution will inform the update of the Climate Action Plan • Next Steps o Climate Action Plan Update ■ ESA completed review of other jurisdictions Climate Action Plans ■ Considering format changes and new information to do a major update of the 2010 CAP ■ Develop robust public engagement process ■ Continue consulting with Mayor's Climate Protection Committee o Interim Actions ■ Interdepartmental "Climate Action Team" of City employees to explore actions the City of Edmonds can take now to help mitigate climate change ■ Identify actions the City can take to implement climate goals COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXTEND FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Buckshnis said the Youth Commission also supports a target of 1.5° C. Recent literature states changes can be made by getting rid of fossil fuels and going without gas furnaces, etc. She asked when the GHG model will be rolled out. Ms. Hope answered that will be part of the next steps. One of the reasons for community engagement is to get people on board and to suggest changes. Specific updates to the current Climate Action Plan will occur simultaneously. Prior to 2020, the City Council reviewed this information and gave an informal approval of the idea of a 1.5°Celsius target. The intent is to have the Council formally recognize that target via a resolution. That will be used in working with the community and continuing to refine what's possible. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled even with Taming Bigfoot in 2018, it was difficult to get information out to the entire community. She wanted to ensure the Climate Action Plan included reference to blue carbon as the restoration of the Edmonds Marsh will have a tremendous impact on blue carbon and carbon sequestering. She wished there could have been more time for discussion of this item. Councilmember Distelhorst said he will email questions to staff or speak on August 18t''. He concluded this was an exciting step for the City. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 27 Packet Pg. 43 6.2.a Councilmember Paine said she was sorry this was left to the end of the meeting and she looked forward to more engagement. Council President Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation for Mr. Johnson waiting to make this presentation as it is important to inform the citizens about the City's climate goals. Councilmember L. Johnson thanked the Mayor's Climate Protection Committee for all their work last year on this. She looked forward to further discussions on the update. 2. REVIEW OF COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future Council meeting. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson wished his father-in-law, Mr. Shelley, a very Happy 70th Birthday. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Buckshnis said John Reed was a special light in our universe. He had wisdom, wit, humor, intelligence and a big, open heart. He always sought the truth and reasonableness and that did a lot for the City. She thoroughly enjoyed reading the Planning Board minutes during his era and subsequent roles he took on as a volunteer. His legacy is captured in the archives of the City and she will miss him dearly. Most of all, she will miss the twinkle in his eye and smile on his face because he truly was a gracious leader. RIP John, now you're with Gretchen. Councilmember L. Johnson said John Reed was one of her first examples in Edmonds of informed, vocal and civil public engagement. No doubt his work and his example will have a long lasting impact on Edmonds and on her personally and he will be missed. Councilmember K. Johnson wished everyone be well. Council President Fraley-Monillas said Gretchen and John Reed had been her friends for the last 15 years and she and as well as their children take solace in knowing they are finally together again. It was a challenge for John to face the world without Gretchen in it and she envisioned them continuing to have great debates. Council President Fraley-Monillas advised there seemed to be some misunderstanding regarding the quarterly financial report. Although it was indicated she was making head nods regarding whether it was appropriate or not, she wanted people to understand her issue was with having three Councilmembers bringing up questions for the finance director. Councilmember Buckshnis submitted her questions in advance but three Councilmembers asked questions on the spur of the which resulted in that agenda item taking three times the amount allotted on the agenda. She pointed out there were only five items total on tonight's agenda and the Council was only able get through four items. She encouraged the Council to reach out to directors and get their questions answered prior to the Council meeting. The Council is not getting its work done because of the amount of discussion regarding each item. Not only are Councilmembers asking staff questions in advance, they are often bringing them up again during the meeting and that is starting to bog down the process. She was asked today about having two Council meetings a week, but she was not sure that would change anything when the Council only gets through four items per week. She encouraged Council to get their questions answered in advance so the Council can get its work done. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 28 Packet Pg. 44 COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXTEND FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Fraley-Monillas encouraged Councilmember to get their questions into staff in advance because the Council is not getting the work it needs to get done and a lot of that is due to having questions answered on the fly. Councilmember Olson urged citizens to use masks so we can get serious about fixing this situation that we're in. Councilmember Paine personally credited John Reed for the way downtown is. He was a selfless man, always putting others before himself, and he had a sense of humor. His contributions to the City of Edmonds are very visible in the downtown area due to land use laws he applied while on the Planning Board and his leadership on the Alliance for Citizens of Edmonds (ACE). He was a very nice man who valued his family and his friendships and she will miss him. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Mayor Nelson for the proclamation and everyone's comments about Mr. Reed. It is very sobering to hear and he appreciated what everyone said and what his family meant to the community. He urged citizens to wear masks and take care of each other. He hoped everyone had exercised their democratic right and gotten their ballots in by 8 p.m. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 29 Packet Pg. 45 6.2.a Public Comment for 8/4 Council Meeting: From: michelle dotsch <mdotsch2001@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 2:44 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Hauss, Bertrand <Bertrand.Hauss@edmondswa.gov>; Williams, Phil <Phil.Wllliams@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: Sound Transit Bicycle Lane Project: Route to Edmonds Sounder Transit Station from 5-Corners missing tonight. Shouldn't it be part of this Sound Transit Grant Project so how do you get from 9th Ave to Sounder station? Here is Option for Edmonds' res... * *For public comment record please include image attached if possible - important for visual map to be included otherwise difficult to envision. Thank you. 1) Route from 5-Corners down Main St to Access road through Yost Park, coming out on Maple St where road is wide and should accommodate parking on both sides with dedicated bike lanes. Across 9th, there can be a Hawk signal and crosswalk for safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. 2) Alternate route is coming out at entrance to Yost Park, go down short stretch of Walnut using Sharrows as it is a wide street to preserve parking, especially because it is slated as a future higher density area and already has a crosswalk. There are NO crosswalks across Bowdoin from entrance to Yost Pool until Five Corners — almost a mile! A huge consideration if parking is removed in certain areas. Please consider Sharrows on Bowdoin to keep parking for Yost Pool and Park activities and for the residents/visitors/deliveries to safely park in front of their homes and not be forced to Jaywalk. 3) Maple is safe and wide, traverses at milder grade than Walnut. Dayton was supposed to be the primary route downtown from 91"; curious if next to add bike lanes and lose 50% parking there? Travel Maple using Sharrows and parking allowed on both sides easily accommodated as sightlines excellent and can cross to Dayton on 8th. Main Street also has Sharrows already painted below 6t" Ave so can cross to Main at 6th if easier than continuing down Dayton and access that existing route to the Sounder Station. The public records for Bike counts, only one point for this entire project route was 9th and Walnut. Wouldn't it be more complete, gain better insight where cyclists go from there, having Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 30 Packet Pg. 46 6.2.a counts closer to Westgate, past Westgate on 100th and anywhere on Bowdoin on the upper and lower portions by Yost to see do they turn off early to go South on different streets or go down to 9t"? As public transportation options are not safe during this pandemic (currently forbidden for hospital workers to ride at Main UW Hospital for fear of high transmission rates), people are using the safety of private vehicles to get around and not be exposed to larger, enclosed group settings with strangers. At half -capacity for our buses, Sounder and LightRail requiring 6-foot distancing, more people use family vehicles for transportation. Good flow of all motorized transportation, Uber rides, along with quick and easy parking, will reduce carbon emissions. If they are now waiting longer to move the same distance, taking longer to drive around and around to find safe and reasonably close parking, especially for our aged population, veterans and disabled along with any visitors, keeping the traffic moving along safely and efficiently will help with all aspects of being good stewards of our City. Michelle Dotsch Edmonds Resident Five Corners to The Bowl of Edmonds Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 31 Packet Pg. 47 6.2.a Google Maps Five Comers, 8401-8457Main SY, Edmonds, WA98026toThe Bowl ofEdmonds, Edmonds, WA98020 Sicycle23miles,15min Alternate 31tyde Routes op'ion Hplr aasarrcxv,n, r.d,n, .,,,a. v �.ro ' wnne wmQ _ �� a• � Fme1.1— Q .aar... ana. rM,y 3a<�u w=* .x•w.n zo, wuoa..�, i,© E',M1^.. a �pswnx j � ^�" Qtis��i poi n.m M., .. r�iuip.d<• nvng ,� o.po^ eer ^' npeawm ' .^ ..wr darn nun 3 .w.n ny.,a _ � Ofle Lad,o Eon,o GirardreOsvne© � - ron,.a Waloul Sl ' y"Part ��od PirkslnJ Coinr SCornus Teriyaki Edr-,o�M115 9nel;Eb¢v4¢r_I.� ac.A9n^PY® n�ku inwn - 5 * Ifuilwux Way mnn.•i.,:r.n© - .� w.ea arcane s�,wo. rvY,a ° n ...d,�`, aa' Wutt F.iWly Ho:neQ - FOmtwG: SaM:HId© , W7l N EM . • � 9nbon /!� ✓Yt'.,N � �p -- ,.yA - TecM1iwleg ee Wesl M' �9o..��Y .�.n e,a r "� z r• Na.nwa.n �hYe^IoT�rv/ way. � i •�••,w k Y ff £ (Aip�rG aluecAd�'rs env s>, Google Map drta ®pA2S 500h• p(b via Main St 15 min 2a miles t 23 Ft 1430h r31r 1fl— a From: Ken Reidy <kenreidy@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 6:36 AM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Judge, Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Passey, Scott <Scott.Passey@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Public Comments for August 4, 2020 City Council meeting As Council is studying a review of the Council Code of Conduct, I provide the October 29, 2009 email below as historical conduct to consider during this study. The email is a public record. Please note the use of personal email addresses rather than official city email addresses: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 32 Packet Pg. 48 6.2.a --- On Thu, 10/29/09, gary haakenson <ghaakenson@vahoo.com> wrote: From: gary haakenson <ghaakenson@vahoo.com> Subject: Next week To: "michael plunkett" <michaelppp98@vahoo.com> Date: Thursday, October 29, 2009, 3:47 PM The Hearing Examiner is set to hear the Reidy/Theusen case on November 4th. Scott Snyder and Reidys attorney have been exchanging nasty emails. Finis Tupper has been asking questions of Wambolt. Mauri Moore has made a bunch of public records requests bout the matter and she appears to be working on Reidys behalf which is odd since she was financially supported by Theusen in the mayoral election two years ago. DJ met with Moore and Reidy last week. DJ has now scheduled an Exec session on the matter for next Tuesday against Mr. Snyders better judgment. He has also scheduled a full discussion agenda item after the exec session to talk about the Reidy/Theusen issue which is against Mr. Snyders advice. Scott basically says that he CP can put whatever he wants on the agenda but advised DJ not to with the Hearing Examiner case so close to conclusion which will resolve the City's portion of the matter. I've asked Sandy to make the case to DJ to remove the agenda item and only add it after the exec session if the Council sees fit. If he persists and puts it on the agenda, you may want to rally three other votes to remove it from the agenda on Tuesday night if you think its wise. Just trying to keep you in the loop as to what he is doing. Why he is doing it is beyond me but if he's working with Reidy .... it must be to get at you somehow. I share this email with you as I believe it provides an example of conduct the 2020 Council may want to consider as Council studies updates to the Council Code of Conduct. Conduct including: 1. The use of personal email addresses by elected officials rather than official City email addresses; 2. The impact of financial contributions to Candidates on subsequent conduct; Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 33 Packet Pg. 49 6.2.a 3. Discussion about the Council President, citizens and others in an email without copying those people on the email so that they know elected officials are talking about them, and; 4. Efforts to "rally three other votes" outside of an Open Public Meeting. Thank you for considering this historical conduct as you study and consider updates to the Council Code of Conduct. From: michelle dotsch <mdotsch2001@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 9:04 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Option of Safer and More Bicycle Connections to Edmonds' many Parks and Schools - Alternate Bicycle Route from 5 Corners to Firdale planned bike routes and beyond to Aurora Village Transit Station and MtLk Terrace Light Rail Station Edmonds to 23763-23813 100th Ave W GEdmonds to 23763-23813 100th Ave W Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 34 Packet Pg. 50 6.2.a Bicycle Connections of this Alternate Route using Sharrows on only 20-25 mph max speed roads and links to existing Sharrows and dedicated bike lanes previously completed: Reverse Route the same 1) Five Corners down Main St 1 minute to the access paths on North side to Pine Ridge Park and directly opposite on South side to Shell Valley Rd to Yost Park, , Yost Pool, Yost Sport Courts 2) From Yost Entrance connects down 96th to Westgate Elementary School - there is a safe crossing with Flashing Hawk signal on 96th across 220th Multiple Options: Could then link to 220th existing bike lanes and link to 84th to Five Corners loop and 212th and 76th to Perrinville and Lynnwood and Interurban Trail from 220th Could go west on 220th across 100th down Elm Way to 8th and connect there heading west on 15th St SW to cross Hwy 104 3) From Westgate Elementary School continue down 96th to 224th and head West across 100th to 8th now south to 15th St SW 4) Go West on 15th St SW - already has existing Sharrows. 5) Much safer intersection with Hwy 104 (Edmonds Way) to cross avoiding all High Risk Traffic congestion, longer crossing paths across Hwy 104 and multiple ingress and egress on either side of 100th North and South of Westgate, plus Bus Stop in front of Bartell's used heavily by Scriber Lake and Edmonds Heights schoolkids and teens. Long lines of cars backing up to Westgate when schools get out as well better with 2 through lanes. 6) Head west now on 226th St SW - already has existing Sharrows and turn South on 106th Ave W toward Sherwood Elementary School Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 35 Packet Pg. 51 6.2.a 7) Heading south on 106th Ave W - already has existing Sharrows until Robin Hood Drive 8) Follow Robin Hood Drive to Hickman Park an JP Patches Playground 9) Pass Hickman Park at stop sign go East along 238th St SW past Klahaya Swim and Tennis Club - already has existing Sharrows until intersection of Firdale Ave and 100th Ave W 10) From this intersection can link to existing Bike lanes on Firdale Ave to Firdale Village and Aurora Village and City of Shoreline. From this intersection can use Safe Routes to School to extend this bicycle route East to Woodway Elementary and Madrona Schools. This Route according to the Bicycle use icon on Google: 3.7 miles taking 23 minutes just 4 minutes longer than original route. This Route avoids issue of purchasing Right -of -Way access at Hwy 104, a State Hwy. these funds do not come out of this Grant - they are Edmonds' responsibility. If you follow the Lynnwood Bike Route on 76th North approaching 196th by entrance to QFC/Rite Aid strip mall, their dedicated bike lane just ends (poof!) mid -way to the intersection - how safe is that? It must have been too expensive or difficult a design to cross 196th, so they didn't. Crossing WA State Highway 104 will be an even more difficult process, potentially costing more money than expected and all cost overruns are the responsibility of the taxpayers of Edmonds. This Route has less continuous steep grades, allowing more levels of bicycle riders, especially the children and teens going to school or for fun. Parents will not want them on the Primary Main Arterial for cars in Edmonds at 9th/100th with just a painted line separating them from the parked cars, driveways and vehicles as those roads are a Max speed of 30 mph. This Route adds more connections to parks and schools already at 20-25 mph so that ALL riders can learn to use these routes safely and feel more comfortable than being forced by the bike lane next to the Main Arterial of cars that can go 30mph. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 36 Packet Pg. 52 6.2.a Please consider this route as a viable option that can create more safety, more harmony with popular and frequent destinations within Edmonds, lower speed limit routes, existing lanes and sharrows already there to connect to, making costs cheaper. This route also links up better with our Safe Routes to School program, potentially also allowing more financial options for electronic speed signs, flashing beacons, additional safe crosswalks, giving us so many more options for many benefits to more of our residents and visitors alike. I am more than happy to help in any way to make this a WIN -WIN for many, many more of our Citizens of all ages and locations, bringing this option to ride safely in Edmonds to a reality without sacrificing our only main route North and South through Edmonds, allowing the cars to move easily and safely through, thereby reducing Greenhouse gases by not eliminating a through lane on each side, which will definitely back up cars, now sitting, idling, waiting longer and belching more CO2 into the air. We are slated to add more than 3000 more residents to Edmonds. Less parking means driving more rather than finding easy, safe and available parking. No longer will those living on 9th/100th and Bowdoin/Walnut have to worry that they will lose parking access and their own pedestrian safety issues with minimal existing crosswalks if forced to park across the street and few sidewalks down side roads, especially off of 9th, forcing them to walk in the middle of the street and if winter, it will be dangerously dark after school, sports and work. This took time to put together to share, as I have thought about this route being a great option for some time now, along with an additional one I will send to get to the Edmonds Sound Transit Sounder station. I appreciate all of you in hopefully taking time to review this and look forward to hearing if it can be explored with additional time to process other beneficial route options further before coming to a final conclusion this Tuesday. Sincerely, Michelle Dotsch Edmonds Resident From: Betty Borgen <bjb1888@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 4:20 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Public Comment regarding on -street parking on Walnut Street Mayor Nelson and Edmonds City Councilors: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 37 Packet Pg. 53 6.2.a Please see attached file as submission of Public Comment regarding request for continued allowance of on -street parking on Walnut Street in Edmonds. Thank you, Betty J. Borgen and James C. Borgen Please note: I was given an undeliverable e-mail address for Mayor Nelson, so am including all recipients once again in this e-mail. Please disregard if this is a duplicate e-mail. August 3, 2020 Dear Mayor Nelson and Edmonds City Councilors, Learning that you are considering removing on -street parking on Walnut Street in Edmonds, in favor of dedicated bike lanes, we are requesting that you reconsider this decision for the following reasons: • Several sections of Walnut Street are very hilly • Bikers rarely travel on Walnut Street • Ears travel fast and not easily seen due to steep hills • There is poor lighting and no crosswalks for a good portion of Walnut Street Risk family's safety if required to walk from available parking to residence, especially during dark, wet winter months • Homeowners, often working from home and thus taking up driveway parking, would require visitors to find parking elsewhere which would be almost impossible for visiting, elderly grandparents, etc. We urge you to continue allowing on -street parking on Walnut Street in Edmonds. Thank you, X Borgen J BettyJ. Boroen borgen@bendbroadband.com bib1889@hotmail.com From: Bre Borgen <b.borgen@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 3:07 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov> Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 38 Packet Pg. 54 6.2.a Cc: Bre Borgen <b.borgen@hotmail.com> Subject: KEEP Walnut Street Parking PLEASE Hello, I hope this message find you all healthy and doing well. I am writing with major concerns about taking away street parking and replacing it with bike lanes between 9th Avenue and Walnut Street. I live on Walnut Street and rely heavily on street parking. Within four houses of mine there are a total of 6 kids under the ages of 9 that live on both sides of the street. When these families are forced to park on the opposite side of their homes this is putting children and families at risk. In addition, there are two assisted living homes on Walnut Street. Forcing the elderly resident's visitors to park far away is not okay. The employees for these facilities will also be pushed into other crowded streets. I do not feel any of these factors were considered at all when Walnut Street was selected for this new bike route. Please correct me if I am wrong and you collected data from neighbors about our thoughts and usage. Is this really the best way to spend money right now even if it is a grant from Sound Transit? Zillow just announced work from home forever. How many other big companies are going to make the move away from downtown Seattle with the current situation we are seeing? It looks as if Luke Distelhorst, as stated in one of his response emails and by viewing his Twitter account, represents the cyclists and is pro bike lanes. My question is who do you have representing the residents that rely heavily on street parking? Also, I wonder about the crowded parking around Bar Dojo and another assisted living facility near Bowdoin and 84th Avenue. Where will this parking overflow to? Lastly, does the city not have a legal obligation to inform residents directly impacted by such a big change? You are eliminating parking that when we purchased these homes knew we could use for ourselves and visitors. When a new house is being built, as we were just informed that 4 new homes are being built on Walnut Street, it was nice to know ahead of time about this change. The city of Edmonds sent us a letter regarding the 4 new homes and we appreciated it. You provided no such notice regarding the potential loss of parking. Furthermore, the 4 new homes on Walnut will cause additional congestion and parking strain on a street where you want to take away street parking? Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 39 Packet Pg. 55 6.2.a The bottom line is, currently cyclists can ride up and down Walnut Street as is, even though I hardly see anyone use it as it is a very steep hill, so why take away the street parking of residents that utilize these spaces on a daily basis? I've been in contact with Thalia Moutsanides and Diane Shrewsberry that live on Sunset Avenue to get ideas on how to prevent these types of parking changes as I know they were involved in Sunset Avenue proposals. I am prepared to work with neighbors and other community members to help save our parking. Thank you for considering the impact you are making on Walnut Street. Please do not approve this proposal. Or at least pause and gather more information from those that will be directly impacted as I and others do not feel were considered. Thank you, Breanna Borgen From: Kassie Radwick <Radwick6@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 10:22 AM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Subject: DO NOT REMOVE STREET PARKING ON WALNUT STREET!!!!!! Dear Edmonds City Council: Please keep street parking on Walnut St. For the safety of our neighbors on Walnut, to prevent further congestion around City -owned Yost Park during the summer and to prevent a poor use of our tax dollars, we ask you to NOT remove parking on Walnut in favor of dedicated bicycle lanes. Thank you, Kassie Radwick From: Eileen Torres <eileenmtl@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 6:55 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Dedicated Bicycle Lanes Dear Council Members, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 40 Packet Pg. 56 6.2.a I live at 1057 Walnut Street, just west of Yost Park. My husband and I love the idea of more bike lanes in Edmonds, however I am not sure it is wise to use both sides of these particular streets, eliminating street parking altogether. Walnut and Bowdoin are used as overflow for Yost Park (hiking, pool and pickle ball activities). The folks on 96th are going to have to absorb a lot of this overflow and it is going to make travel into Yost Park busier and more dangerous for the kids to cross. The current parking area in Yost is barely sufficient now and usage of that park is ramping up. Especially in the summer (other than this year) there is a lot of traffic when the pool opens. The entrance to Yost Park (96th and Walnut) is at the bottom of a steep hill which makes it very easy for cars to accelerate coming downhill. What makes it worse it that because Yost Park entrance is at the bottom of the hill, it does not look like a typical intersection and we have witnessed that people not familiar with the area won't even clue into the fact that there is an intersection there. If you do decide to create bike lanes on both sides, forcing folks to park and walk across the intersection, I strongly recommend adding a crosswalk lighting system that flashes for folks to cross. I am concerned that there could be a real safety issue involving kids otherwise. Thanks for your consideration. Eileen and Robin Torres From: Mark Bucklin <outlook ODCF416302E9OC3C@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 10:34 AM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Bike Lanes om 9th/100th. Council members: I urge you to reject the tentative plan to use Sound Transit grant money for bike lanes on 9` Ave./100th . I have lived on 9th Ave. S. For 45 years. The current bike lanes in Edmonds are rarely used. Second, 9th Ave. S. is a major commuter feeder line for N/S traffic in Edmonds and to the freeway. Third, there are no good off street parking options for deliverymen, vendors or guests of those who live on 9th. I see lots of Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 41 Packet Pg. 57 6.2.a Amazon, UPS and yard maintenance trucks and residents cars parked during the day on 9t" Those who currently elect to bike on 9th Ave. S./100th do not seem to be having any problems doing so. I have biked on 9th S. for 62 years and had no problems. Bike lanes can create a false sense of security for cyclists and increase the risk of right turn accidents with motorists. (Note young woman lawyer killed last year in downtown Seattle bike lane.). The premise of the grant seems to be to have commuters bike to Sound Transit park and ride lot in Mountlake Terrace. Any study to show that this would really happen? I doubt it especially during the eight rainy months of the year. This is not a good idea. Please vote no to this idea. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 4, 2020 Page 42 Packet Pg. 58 6.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of August 11, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 08-11-2020 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 59 6.3.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES August 11, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President (joined meeting at 10:29 p.m.) Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 10:25 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. 2. ACTION ITEM COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT HR Director Neill Hoyson explained this is the new contract for Council legislative/executive assistant. It will become effective as of the date of Council approval and will extend through January 31, 2021. All items in the contract remain the same except for the wage; there is a proposed wage adjustment 2.75%, the same amount the non -represented (NR) employees received in 2020. It would be effective as of the date the Council approves the contract; retroactive payment is not permitted for this type of employee. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the contract had been sent out to Councilmembers today. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered it was sent out yesterday by the City Clerk. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the contract still has 3 weeks of vacation; she asked what the 2.75% increase equated to. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered the 2.75% increase would increase the wage to $33.91/hour. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why this took so long to get approved; it is now August and the contact should have been approved earlier this year. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered per code the legislative/executive is assistant hired by Council on an annual basis. She has assisted Council with amendments to the contract throughout this year to allow the Council President time to complete the evaluation; three amendments were made to the contact that addressed giving the Council President time to complete the evaluation. Ultimately it is the Council's responsibility to hire this employee annually. Councilmember Buckshnis commented there have never been problems in past renewing contracts. The contract has been renewed twice, it expired on June 30th, the evaluation was done in February. She Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 60 6.3.a commented something needed to be with regard to the oversight of contracts as it was a disservice to employees who were being paid out of contract. (Council President Fraley-Monillas joined the meeting at 10:29 p.m.) Councilmember Buckshnis restated her question, why has it taken so long to present this contract to the Council; she has been out of contract since the end of June which was disservice to the employee. Council President Fraley-Monillas said mostly it was her fault because she wasn't aware she was keeping track of the contract. The contract expired at the end of June and she did not remember it had expired until recently. That is why there is a hurry now because technically she is working without a contract. Councilmember Buckshnis commented this seems like a consistent problem and suggested a tickler system to avoid it happening in the future. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed she should have been paying closer attention. The contract could not be renewed initially due to COVID-related OPMA restrictions, then there was a delay until the evaluation was completed and then was evaluation done. She acknowledged there was no one to blame but her for not having it done by the end of June. Ms. Neill Hoyson advised Council President Fraley-Monillas that she had reviewed the proposed 2.75% wage increase with Council , but had not addressed any other issues. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed the issue is although other NR employees received the small increase from January until now, the City cannot provide this position with retroactive pay; some of the delay was due to COVID. She suggested determining a way to compensate her for the portion of the year that she was not paid the additional 2.75% which equates to approximately $1000. There has been discussion about doubling the percentage of the wage increase between now and the end of the year to make up a portion of the time she was not paid the additional 2.75% or perhaps she could be provided more leave. Council President Fraley-Monillas supported compensating the employee in some way because this occurred through no fault of her own. Councilmember Paine relayed her understanding the pay increase of $0.91 per hour was the 2.75% that other NR employees received. Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed. To Council President Fraley-Monillas' point, the employee would have received it if her contract had been approved in a timely manner. The right thing to do is to find a good mathematically equation to adjust the hourly rate to address the loss of back pay. Councilmember Olson said her concern with that approach is future salaries are based on the current salary. Ms. Neill Hoyson said any doubling of the wage adjustment to accommodate the issue of the delay in contract approval would need to be noted in the contract and any future pay adjustment would be based on the 2.75% increase and not any additional percentage. Councilmember Buckshnis commented Ms. Judge should have reminded Council President that her contract had expired. This is tragic and an embarrassment. She did not know all the details, but the City needs to get something in place so this does not keep happening. Councilmember K. Johnson said Councilmember L. Johnson and she reviewed this with Ms. Neill Hoyson during the Public Safety, Personnel and Planning (PSPP) Committee meeting and it was then extended twice through June. At the time of the PSPP's review the performance review had not been done, which she believed was done in June. She agreed this should never happen, commenting contracting is a problem throughout the City as has been seen with other valued employees. She recommend key people look at this issue and determine a way to ensure it doesn't happen again. Councilmember K. Johnson said as she stated earlier, the idea that the Council President gives consent over the activities of the legislative assistant is something that was added to the contract after Ms. Judge Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 61 6.3.a was hired and was totally inappropriate and in her personal experience, it has not been a fair or equitable process. With regard to a Councilmember giving the legislative/executive assistant project work and there is conflict in direction in that work and the Council President having control over that, that was added in the 2016 contract for Mr. Pierce. Council President Fraley-Monillas said that was added when Councilmember K. Johnson was Council President. Ms. Judge's performance evaluation was done well before June. Councilmember Buckshnis confirmed it was done in February. Council President Fraley-Monillas said COVID restrictions then occurred in March and it has gone on and on. There needs to be a way to compensate Ms. Judge. She asked whether the contract approval and a way to compensate her for the time she did not received the additional 2.75% needed to be resolved tonight. Mr. Taraday said it was problematic that Ms. Judge has been working without a contract and without any express acquiescence from the City Council. He assuming the Council knew she was still working so there is perhaps some implied acquiescence. This is not the way City business should function, to have people working without contracts, and he could not recommend she continue working without a contract. If there was something complicated about this that needed further thought, he suggested the Council approve the contract in the packet and/or make amendments to it and if a further amendments were needed to compensate her for the delayed pay raise, that could be address in a couple weeks to give Council and staff time to address it in a careful and thoughtful way. Councilmember Paine offered a suggestion, the difference is $0.91/hour. It has been seven months and adding another $0.91 to her base pay would essentially be the additional 2.75% that was missing for the first half of the year. She did not want Ms. Judge to suffer financially due to this oversight. She agreed with everyone's comments that there needed to be a system to track contracts. Ms. Neill Hoyson said using Councilmember Paine's suggestion, the hourly rate would be $34.82/hour; the contract language could be clarified that any subsequent raises would be based on the $33.91/hour rate. Councilmember Olson asked whether the Council would see the contract on the Consent Agenda with that language. Ms. Neill Hoyson said if the Council approved the contract with that amendment tonight, it would be approved with the amendment. Mr. Taraday advised the Council is in a special session so the Council has the ability to take action on the contract with or without amendments. Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated Mr. Taraday suggestion that the Council could pass the contract as is tonight and, especially considering the late hour, give careful consideration into the best way to compensate her for the lost pay. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT AS IS. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, that the Council had not concluded questions. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out the contract was not in the packet. Staff said it was sent by email but she did not see the email. She felt it was inappropriate to take action at 10:48 p.m. when the Council did not have all the information. Council President Fraley-Monillas said staff should not be punished due to a Councilmember not looking at their packet. Councilmember K. Johnson reiterated it was not in the packet. Council President Fraley- Monillas advised it was sent this afternoon. She did not want staff to be punished and not able to work due to this oversight. She supported approving the contract and figuring out the further compensation with Ms. Neill Hoyson by the end of the week as Mr. Taraday made it clear to her that this has to be dealt with tonight. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 62 6.3.a Councilmember Distelhorst advised packet was emailed to Council by City Clerk Scott Passey at 4:00 p.m. Monday. Councilmember L. Johnson said the legislative assistant falls under the Council's purview and the Council needs to approve her contract tonight. Contract amendments have been considered by Council numerous times. She did not find an issue with approving the contract as is tonight and then carefully considering the additional compensation moving forward. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out the Council typically get packets Friday afternoon. Sending something out at 4 p.m. Monday or 3 p.m. on Tuesday with the expectation that Councilmembers have read it is unrealistic. The Council President, Mayor and staff have a duty to provide a complete packet and she found this an inappropriate way to conduct business. Councilmember Olson said she did not wholly disagree with Councilmember K. Johnson. It may have been enough time but a heads up phone call would have been helpful so that it was sure to be on Council's radar. She was in favor of proceeding with the basic contract because the only change from last year's contract is the 2.75% COLA. Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed. Councilmember Olson was comfortable going forward with approving the contract tonight. She found it interesting that Councilmembers were saying an employee shouldn't pay the price for things that were not done right by the City in this case, but when came to Chief Lawless, the Council didn't want to make up for what the City didn't do right. Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order; the discussion was veering into other subjects including what happened last week as a comparison to this. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken, members will keep remarks strictly to the topics of discussion, the contract for the council legislative/executive assistant. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, THAT WE APPROVE MS. JUDGE'S CONTRACT AND MS. NEILL HOYSON WILL GET BACK TO COUNCIL IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS WITH THE COMPENSATION FOR THE COLA THAT HAS BEEN MISSING FROM JANUARY TO AUGUST. Councilmember K. Johnson found it inappropriate to have a blank check. If the Council is approving a contract, they need to know the terms of the contract. She summarized this had not been done in a very professional manner. Councilmember Distelhorst said as Ms. Neill Hoyson said, the terms of the contract were the same as the contract that had already been extended with one change, the COLA that increases the wage from $33/hour to $33.91/hour. Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed that was the only change to the contract. Three amendments were approved with the existing language; the only difference from the previous amendments is the addition of the COLA. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND TO JUST APPROVE THE CONTRACT AS IS. Councilmember Buckshnis said at this late hour, the Council should approve the contract and Ms. Neill Hoyson and/or Council President Fraley-Monillas can bring back a new contract with a new dollar amount and it can either be scheduled on the Consent Agenda or a future agenda. The public did not see this contract because it was sent to Council on Monday. Councilmember Paine said she would support a motion to have the contract extended to end of January 2021 with her wage at $33.91. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 63 6.3.a Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order; there is already have a motion and an amendment on the floor and it is not appropriate to place another motion on the floor. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken, there is a motion on the floor to approve the existing contract. Councilmember Paine raised a point of clarification, whether Councilmember Buckshnis' motion included $33/hour or $33.91/hour. Councilmember Buckshnis clarified her motion was to approve the contract with the COLA and staff or Council President Fraley-Monillas come back with the backpay. Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, stating that was her original motion, that Ms. Neill Hoyson would return to Council with the missing value. She wanted it to be clear in the motion that the Council would provide some level of compensation to address the 2.75% that had not been paid since January. Mayor Nelson ruled point not taken. Councilmember Buckshnis clarified her motion was to approve the contract with the COLA. The Council can trust Ms. Neill Hoyson to come back with the additional amount; that did not need to be included in the motion. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the motion says nothing about paying the back compensation. She encouraged Councilmembers to vote against the amendment and vote for the main motion that references that compensation. Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated wanting to clarify that Ms. Judge will be compensated and that would be her intent. Understanding that some research needs to occur, she was unsure the Council could definitively say that compensation would be provided and that there was a method to do it. Council President Fraley-Monillas said there are multiple ways of compensating Ms. Judge including doubling the COLA, providing additional leave, providing a flat amount, etc. Her problem with Councilmember Buckshnis' amendment is it does not clearly state Ms. Judge will be compensated. She suggested Councilmember Buckshnis change the motion to say Ms. Judge will be compensated. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was implied that the Council will do something about it and are directing Ms. Neill Hoyson to look into how to compensate Ms. Judge. To add it to the motion does not make sense because it is unknown how she will be compensated, whether it will be with money, leave or something else so a new contract will be required. She preferred to have that research done and a new contract presented. Council President Fraley-Monillas said Councilmember Buckshnis' statement made it clear Ms. Judge will be compensated. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW THE MOTION. Councilmember Olson asked if a motion is withdrawn, whether the amendment becomes the main motion. Mr. Taraday answered said it was probably not proper to have Council President Fraley- Monillas' motion withdrawn when there was an amendment pending. He suggested starting from scratch. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT AS SUBMITTED TODAY IN THE PACKET WITH A FUTURE REVISIT TO THE COMPENSATION FOR THE TIME THAT WAS NOT DONE AT THAT HIGHER LEVEL. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 64 6.3.a UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON, PAINE, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 65 6.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Approval of Council Committee Meeting Minutes of August 11, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 08-11-2020 Draft Council Committee Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 66 6.4.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING COUNCIL COMMITTEE DRAFT MINUTES August 11, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Phil Williams, Public Works Director Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Pamela Randolph, Treatment Plant Mgr. Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Rob English, City Engineer Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Vivian Olson, Councilmember Scott Passey, City Clerk Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO ADD THE FLAG SALUTE AND THE LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. FLAG SALUTE The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 3. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Council President Fraley-Monillas read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." A brief discussion occurred regarding items on the agenda of this meeting and on the special meeting that will follow. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order regarding the fifth item on the agenda. City Clerk Scott Passey advised the fifth item is an action item on the agenda of the special meeting that follows the committee meeting. 4. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 67 PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH OSBORN CONSULTING, INC. FOR THE PHASE 2 & 3 STORM UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT City Engineer Rob English explained this is a supplemental agreement for design work related to the 2021 and 2022 stormwater replacement program. Osborn Consulting was selected earlier this year based on their qualifications and experience through the RFQ process. Staff has identified five locations where improvements will be made, all have the same common issue, pipe that is beginning to fail or is in very poor condition. In three of the five sites, pipe will be replaced as well as potentially adding capacity. Due to COVID-19 related restrictions that prevent staff bringing this contract to Council, a $97,000 contract was initiated to do the initial site surveys and data collection for the five sites. This a supplemental agreement to take those five sites to a 30% design level which includes generating estimates from which 2-3 of the 5 sites will be selected to proceed to final design and construction documents. Those sites will be advertised and built in 2021 and the remaining sites carried forward to 2022 for construction. He reviewed the seven tasks in the supplement: Task 1: Project Management Task 2: Data collection and review Task 3: Project planning and preliminary design Task 4: Permitting support Task 5: Construction documents Task 6: Bid and construction support (2021) Task 7: Management reserve and field reserve The total supplemental amount is $413,291 which includes an $80,000k management reserve. The design effort will be funded by the Stormwater Utility Replacement Fund. Staff s recommendation is to move this item to next week's Consent Agenda for approval. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to Task 7 and reference to Tasks 9.1 and 9.2 and Tasks 1 through 8 in the agreement and questioned whether this was taken from another contract because it is not numerically logical. Mr. English agreed it should be Task 7.1 and Task 7.2 and Tasks 1 through 7. That will be corrected. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to the field reserve, noting she was familiar with the concept of a management reserve, but did not recall seeing a field reserve in any other Public Works contracts. Mr. English answered this is primarily related the capacity of the Public Works crews. Potholing existing facilities to identify any buried conflicts will be a big effort. At times, the Public Works crews have done that work, but they have their own operational workload so if they are too busy, a company will be hired via this contract to perform that work. That section also identifies additional survey work or geotechnical investigation if there are issues related to the bioretention facilities proposed at a couple of sites where additional investigation may be needed. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if that was work that staff would like to have done or was it something the contractor proposed. Mr. English answered this was added as a management reserve; the work would only be done and that fee used if the City authorized it. Whether the consultant performs the work or the Public Works crew does the work depends on the Public Works crews' availability. Councilmember K. Johnson acknowledged with replacement, what will be encountered is unknown until field work begins. Councilmember Buckshnis said she had same question with the numbering. On packet page 4, the contract refers to $97,795 in paragraph 2A, but she was unable to find paragraph 2A. The management reserve is $80,000 and the total amount is $413,291. She asked what the $97,795 represents. Mr. English explained that was the initial contract in May to perform the survey and data collection. Staff had planned to bring the entire contract to Council in May but due to restrictions that allowed only necessary and routine items be presented to Council, a contract was executed for $97,795 to perform the initial work. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 68 6.4.a This is a supplement agreement to that $97,795 for $413,291. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the reference to paragraph 2A was the original contract which was not included in the packet. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO PUT THE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH OSBORN CONSULTING, INC. FOR THE PHASE 2 & 3 STORM UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR NEXT WEEK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PROPOSAL TO REALLOCATE POSITIONS AT THE WWTP TO SUPPORT THE Public Works Director Phil Williams explained issues with staffing at the WWTP have existed for at least five years when employees left including the plant superintendent, the second management employee of the WWTP, who retired. Despite numerous efforts over about three years, the right candidate has not been found so the position has remained vacant. Last year a former general manager of the Ronald Wastewater District was hired under an employment contract as a program administrator. This proposal includes extending that position into 2021 in the draft budget. He displayed the existing organizational chart, explaining historically there was a plant manager, plant supervisor, operations lead and a maintenance lead. At this time, the WWTP does not have a plant supervisor, an operations lead or a maintenance which makes it difficult on Treatment Plant Manager Pamela Randolph to maintain management functions. He displayed and reviewed a revised organization chart that reflects the proposed realignment at the WWTP and would: • Reallocate the WWTP Plant Supervisor (NR13) to Program Administrator (NR10 —budget at top step) • Continue to fund the OIT, which has been authorized but not filled due to the hiring freeze (F, G or K depending on qualifications budget for K step 1) • Reallocate the Operations Lead to a Chief Operator (anticipated to be Teamsters M + 5% or a new N—which is currently not in in the contract budget M top step) • Reallocate the Sr. Maintenance Mechanic (Teamsters K) to WWTP Instrument /Electrical Technician (Teamsters L Budget at K step 2) Mr. Williams displayed the WWTP chief operator draft job description, explaining in addition to operator duties, this position would assign, coordinate and oversee the work of operations and maintenance. He pointed out the job description includes a percentage of the duties for the position. He referenced the required license and certifications including a WWTP Operator Group IV License required withinl year, WWTP Group III at the time of hire and due to the existing incinerator, an Incinerator Operator License within 6 months of hire may be required. Mr. Williams displayed a page from the 2020 Sewer Fund budget, a total of 17 authorized FTEs $1,418,783. With the proposed changes, the budget for 2021 will be $1,442,091, an increase of $23,308 (does not include any COLA). Mr. Williams explained the chief operator would be a Teamsters union position, not a management position, so it will need to be negotiated with the Teamsters before it can be implemented. He was seeking Council approval of job description. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification, the position will be negotiated once the Council approved the job description. Mr. Williams agreed. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she reviewed the job description and although she did not completely understand all the nuances of the position, it makes sense since the City has been unable to hire a plant superintendent. She asked for clarification Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 69 6.4.a regard the pay grade which states N+5%. Mr. Williams said it could go to the next tier in Teamsters; it will be at least 5% but will be negotiated. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned whether the cost would be more than $23,000 and if that amount was due to the two unfilled positions. Mr. Williams answered there are salary savings and increases, the $23,000 is an estimate of the net number. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the chief operator was included in the $1.442 million 2021 budget. Mr. Williams explained two lead positions and the plant supervisor were eliminated and a chief operator was added. Councilmember Buckshnis said the new hierarchy looks great. She asked if the new number included the two unfilled positions. Mr. Williams it does. There are 17 people working at WWTP in 2020 and 17 after the new org chart is implemented. It is not an increase in staff but results in a minimal increase in labor costs. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if all the staff will transition into the gasification project. Mr. Williams explained that ongoing $26 million project is a completely different technology than the staff is used to which will be pretty highly automated. A nitrogen removal pilot project began yesterday to see if it can help meet the state's expectations on nitrogen discharge which will take quite a bit of time over the next year. Then the WWTP will see what the permit looks like and there may be other projects to comply with it. There are a lot of changes occurring at the WWTP; the goal is to align staffing and skills with the near and mid-term future. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if more or less staff would be needed due to automation. Mr. Williams answered he did not necessarily expect automation to have a dramatic effect on the annual labor hours, but people can do much higher level and more important work and take some of the drudgery and manual labor out via the right control equipment which reduces risk. People who are required to watch a gauge all day may look away, but computers never take their eyes off the ball so the plant operates more evenly and predictably which reduces risk. Councilmember Paine asked if the new chief operator position was a typical span of control with 11 staff reporting. Mr. Williams answered it was not excessive considering the duties. In the proposed structure, there will be only one management staff, Ms. Randolph. The chief operator position will not have straight -up supervisory duties; they will be assigning work, but will not be evaluating, recommending discipline or engaging in that type of higher level supervisory duties. They will work with the plant manager to offer observations and information, but directly dealing with employees based on the existing labor contract will be the responsibility of the plant manager. HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson clarified the typical process would be for the Council committee to consider the job description and advise staff to notify the union of the new job description and bargain the job description or impacts/changes of the structure and then return to Council with the final job description or if the job description was significantly changed during the bargaining process, bring it back to committee for review. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO MOVE THIS ON TO ADMINISTRATION TO NOTIFY THE UNION AND THEN HAVE IT ON CONSENT NEXT WEEK. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out Ms. Neill Hoyson said it needed to be presented to the union before it was approved on Consent. Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed, and did not anticipate that could be accomplished by next week. She suggested having it on Consent once done the union process is complete. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW THE MOTION. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 70 6.4.a COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, THAT THIS GO TO THE ADMINISTRATION AT THIS POINT AND COME BACK TO COUNCIL ON A CONSENT AGENDA AS SOON AS THEY'RE ABLE TO MOVE IT FORWARD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. JOB ORDER CONTRACTING - PURCHASING POLICY Mr. Williams explained this is an opportunity to add a tool to the procurement toolbox by making a change in the purchasing policy. Job Order Contracting (JOC) did not exist in Washington until last year. • Definition of JOC o "Existing Washington State RCW 39.10.420 to RCW 39.10.460 o Job order contract" means a contract in which the contractor agrees to a fixed period, indefinite quantity delivery order contract which provides for the use of negotiated, definitive work orders for public works • Procurement Options o Design — Bid — Build o Design — Build o General Contractor/Construction Manager o Job Order Contracting o Small Works Roster General reasons to choose JOC o Multiple projects that typically range from $25,000 to $350,000 in value o Total dollar volume of work is less than $4 million per year o Limited owner staff availability for proper implementation of other methods o Urgency for project completion Unique aspects of JOC o The owner can stop the JOC contract at any time o Procurement of JOC Contractor = the best competitive coefficient (no hidden costs) o Partnership with JOC Contractor leads to trust and a familiarity with owner's unique needs o Constant value engineering provides best value practices o Unit Price Book = best average cost o JOC eliminates change order philosophy since change orders are based on Unit Price Book What is JOC's construction niche? o Fast response for small ($350,000 or less) repair, renovation, remodel and alteration projects o Services provided on an on -call basis o Lump -sum fixed price for each work order o Owner negotiates (consensus) the scope of work o Cost coefficient is established upfront Typical projects o Infrastructure upgrade projects (usually multi -discipline) ■ Bathroom renovation ■ ADA Compliance renovation projects ■ Communication/security systems installations ■ Classroom renovations ■ Parks and playfields renovation projects Some benefits of JOC for owners o Reduced lead time — no need to plan or prepare bid documents and drawings for each work order o Eliminated bid time o Expedited engineering, since JOC projects usually require no architectural or engineering services for construction of projects Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 71 6.4.a o Joint scoping and re-scoping as needed • Increased opportunities for small and disadvantages businesses o JOC furnishes bonding for most subcontractors o JOC completes "red tape" requirements o JOC uses best value bid analysis for subcontractors & partners with subcontractors o JOC recruits small and disadvantaged businesses o JOC coaches subcontractors in all aspects of quality work, safety and project management (as needed) o JOC pays subcontractors promptly, typically subcontractor payment is not tied to JOC contractor's payment from the owner, and no retainage is held. • Diagram mapping the JOC process (scoping phase and proposal phase) • Scope of Work Example 1 o Demo / dispose of 3 existing lights. Reuse existing circuit for new lights. o Remove & replace 2 existing HVAC grilles o Install gyp ceiling at 8' 8" with 4 new surface mounted explosion proof lights. o Relocate existing smoke detector to new ceiling o Demo CMU for 42" opening min. (exist opening +/- 36") o Demo & dispose of existing metal partitions and replace with new 4" CMU covered completely with ceramic tile, with one block scupper at bottom of each o Remove and reinstall existing 3 urinals and 2 commodes o Demo ceramic tile, floors and walls, typ. and walls, typ. (exist ceramic on walls is approx. 8'- 0" high) Mr. Williams summarized he was seeking input from the Council whether this sounded like a good idea; it does to staff. Other cities who are using it see a lot of value in it. The City could, by changing its purchasing policies, seek out a contractor to bring a proposal to Council for approval. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to the slide regarding "What is the JOC's construction niche?" and the statement of "fast response for small ($350,000 or less) projects" which caused her to think JOC was for small projects. However, Attachment A states, maximum total dollars that may be awarded under a JOC is $4 million per year for a maximum of 3 years and the maximum dollar amount for each work order is $500,000. Mr. Williams agreed, explaining some continue to lobby the legislature to raise those limits, specifically raising $500,000 to $1 million. That does not mean Edmonds would use it in that manner; Edmonds could continue to use design -bid -build, but put a toe in the water and see how the City likes JOC and if it provides the benefits that others are finding, build up to a comfortable level using this procurement program. Councilmember K. Johnson said if the policy is changed, it would authorize up to $4 million for a project without a competitive bid. Mr. Williams disagreed, there cannot be a $4 million project, the limit per project is $500,000. He noted this was not his PowerPoint but one that has been delivered by people that do this work and they are looking at a sweet spot between $25,000 to $350,000 range where the speed at which the work can be done is maximized. In a large project, there is typically a lot of complexity, public interest, citizen involvement, etc. that would generally extend the timelines for delivering work. The JOC is best used, particularly in a city of Edmonds' size, for smaller projects than would be legally allowed. Councilmember Paine asked if staff had an opportunity to look at the means of setup with a unit price versus the recent opportunities with design -bid -build scenarios. She recalled during COVID and when smaller projects were bid, the bids were better than expected. She was not necessarily opposed to adding another tool to the toolkit like JOC, but she was interested in what staff had learned about the price differential. Mr. Williams answered it would depend on the project; JOC would be good for the capital facilities renewal budget each year where more could be done without developing projects to a high level Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 72 of design first. Facilities Manager Thom Sullivan can go through the means book and look at the prices, review recent bids to see if the prices are competitive and compare well and if so, take advantage of the JOC route. If it looks like the price is out of line, the City owes the JOC nothing at that point and the project does not have to move forward which puts pressure on the JOC to give the City a competitive price. Staff can use their professional judgment to determine if the price is appropriate based on what has been spent in the past. Councilmember Paine agreed staff were the experts. Councilmember Paine asked if staff had an opportunity to talk with nearby communities about their experience. Mr. Williams said staff has talked with Everett the most who is using it in facilities although it is not limited to facilities. Any Public Works jobs would be a candidate for this and there are a fair number of projects that are over $500,000 that would be applicable under the current law. He envisioned the City starting small, trying the JOC and seeing how it works. The City may find they do not like a particular JOC and want to try another; the City can easily get out of one JOC and select another. There is very little downside because the City does not have to use it at all. Councilmember Paine asked how he envisioned managing for MWBE and historically underutilized businesses (HUB). Mr. Williams answered it would depend on the relationship with the JOC; if the City does not like the contractors they provide, they will not get any work. The City could relay its desire to have greater involvement from certain types of businesses, the JOC will provide that because they will not get the contract if they don't. Similarly the City could say it has enjoyed working with X company and would like to see them on a project. If the City is not obliged to give them anything; the JOC has a certain desire to please and provide what the City is looking for. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked what was the downside. Mr. Williams answered he and Mr. English have listened to a company that is very active in job order contracting, Gordian, as well as contractors involved with them, and honestly neither of them had identified a true downside. Council President Fraley-Monillas said if it was such a good thing, every city would be doing it. Mr. Williams answered at some point every city will have the option because their codes will allow it whether they use it or not. Edmonds is not on the leading edge of this and not one of the last either, but upfront in determining whether this has benefit for the City. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if there were any labor -related issues. Mr. Williams answered not really, the City did not have to give the JOC any particular work. For example, if there was a small job that the union thought they had the capability to do and have done it in past; the City may want them to do it or contract it out. For example, painting the Frances Anderson Center; staff does a lot of painting but does not paint entire buildings so it would seem to be out of scope to be delivered by the local Teamsters and he doubted they would complain. However, if it was painting only two rooms, staff does that routinely and he envisioned that would continue. Council President Fraley-Monillas said that was her only concern, supplanting any current City work. Councilmember Distelhorst referred to disadvantaged and underutilize businesses and asked whether Tacoma was currently using JOC. Mr. Williams answered yes. Councilmember Distelhorst said Tacoma is doing a lot of work in that space; one of the points from the 2019 Disparity Study was ensuring contracts are split into smaller pieces which provides better opportunities for disadvantaged businesses. He asked if that was how JOC would factor into it. Mr. Williams said the JOC's willingness to coach, mentor, help with the red tape, and get the skill set by helping them with higher level functions that may be intimidating to a small contractor. JOC would meet both needs, theirs and the City's. Councilmember Olson absolutely recognized this instrument although she did not know it by the name JOC. The Department of Defense used a similar method for supplies, blanket purchase agreement. Having authority for a blanket purchase agreement or for JOC that is much higher than individual work orders, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 7 Packet Pg. 73 6.4.a repeat relationships, not requiring as much work on bid and proposal which very costly in time and staff means the customer gets a better price. This is very commonly used outside the state and is a great option. She agreed with Councilmember Paine's point that on occasion the City would want to bid things to check market conditions. In the last few weeks the Council unanimously supported the idea of trying harder to support minority businesses. She expressed support for JOC. Mr. Williams recalled they used to be called indefinite delivery contracts. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Attachment A, pointing out the maximum total dollar amount to be awarded under a JOC is $4 million per year for a maximum of 3 years, a total of $12 million. Any unused capacity from the previous year can be carried over from on year and added immediately following the year's limit. She asked if there could be a JOC up to $3 million in 3 years, noting Attachment A also states each work order the JOC shall not exceed $500,000. Mr. Williams said that is what the law allows; the City could adopt that but that does not mean it will be used. He did not see the City doing $12 million worth of JOC in 3 years. The City has not tried it yet and may not like it for some reason that hasn't been identified. He envisioned the City starting out with one, reporting back to Council and doing more if it has promise. Councilmember Buckshnis observed Attachment A states the City may have no more than three JOC in effect at any one time and asked if that was a total of $36 million over 3 years. Mr. Williams answered that would not happen; that was what's was allowed by the legislature. Councilmember K. Johnson said Attachment A was not just what was allowed by the state but would alter the City's resolution and provide provisions related to JOC. She recommended setting parameters and if administration did not think that much authority would be required, the amounts should be lowered. Mr. Williams said staff would still have to seek Council approval over $100,000. Councilmember K. Johnson expressed concern that the presentation of Attachment A has not been consistent. The JOC is good for small projects but she did not think the Council necessarily wanted to authorize $12 million through that process. Mr. Williams answered the money has to be approved in the budget and if the cost is over $100,000, Council approval is required; nothing changes about that. If the City liked JOC and it worked well, more of the already authorized capital spending could be accomplished in that manner but that would be entirely up to the Council to approve. Councilmember K. Johnson said she thought it was a good process but the limits were much higher than what the City would use it for. Even though those amounts are authorized by the state legislature, she was unsure the City wanted to have those high limits. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson; at any one point in time, the City could have $12 million in JOC for three years in a row. Although Mr. Williams says it would not happen, maybe the amount should be adjusted to the City's requirements. Mr. Williams said it was up to the Council but he assured it would never get there without Council having approved each one individually. Councilmember Buckshnis said sometimes important it is important to have policies fit especially with multimillion projects. Technically the City could commit $36 million over a 3 year period toward these job orders which did not sound like it was helping small businesses. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there was an evaluation process, for example if the City engaged in a three year project. She referenced Haines Wharf and asked if there was a way to have stop gaps in place. Mr. Williams commented with Haines Wharf, individual large change orders were approved on a few occasions that consumed all the management reserve for the project. When it finally came to the Council seeking more money for the project, that was when the Council discovered the large change orders. Since then, the Council modified the purchasing policies, establishing a limit of $100,000. Nothing about the JOC would change that; any contract over $100,000 requires Council approval. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 8 Packet Pg. 74 6.4.a Councilmember Buckshnis asked if approval had already been given and things were not working out, was there a way to stop the process. Mr. Williams answered the City can cancel a JOC contract at any time including mid -stream. That can be done now on any capital project, but the City still owes the contractor for whatever work they have performed to that point. That is very seldom done. The pier was a disappointing project, but the Council was involved in every step and nothing was hidden. The way the purchasing policies are constructed, Haines Wharf could not happen without violating the purchasing policies. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed the maximum total amount of $4 million per year for a maximum of 3 years so the total would be $12 million. Mr. Williams answered yes if there were one JOC; the law theoretically allows three JOCs so the total would be $36 million. He did not envision that ever happening because the City did not have that much money. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the statement of $4 million per year for a maximum of $36 million for 3 years and the City may have no more than 3 JOCs in effect at any one time. She asked how $36 million would be possible with $4 million per year. Mr. Williams explained the way the law reads, the City could have more than one JOC. Theoretically, if there was enough money, $4 million could be authorized on a 3 year contract; if there were 3 JOCs, it would be $36 million. He did not see that being possible for Edmonds nor would the City want to. The intent is to start small and frankly the Council could limit that amount if they chose. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether he preferred to the leave the amount as is and make the assumption it would not occur or reduce the amount. Mr. Williams said he would prefer to leave what the law allows as the City's spending limit of $100,000 does not allow any project over $100,000 without Council approval. In addition, a project needs to be in the budget. Councilmember Olson commented one of the reasons a city would have more than one JOC was because they would have different specialties, but she agreed it was unlikely the City would spend anywhere near $4 million with any one of them. Mr. Williams agreed, he could see a JOC that was good at vertical construction, facilities, building renovations, etc. and another related to utilities such as excavation, laying pipe, etc. because those are two very different types of construction. As is currently allowed, if there is a $48,000 project in the budget, that amount could be spent with his signature, up to $100,000 with the Mayor's signature and if it is over $100,000, Council approval is required. Mr. Williams clarified this was not selecting a JOC. This has never been done this before so it is new to staff as well. If sounds it like a good idea, staff will schedule a resolution on the Consent Agenda and then entertain a JOC. It was the consensus of Council to put this on the Consent Agenda. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. 4. REVIEW OF COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT Mayor Nelson said in discussions with Councilmember L. Johnson, there is interest in having a round robin where each Councilmember has an opportunity to speak and rotate through so everyone has an opportunity to speak. Councilmember L. Johnson said she appreciated the opportunity to bring this before Council. She initiated research on a code of conduct in the fall before she was on Council. Her desire for a more comprehensive code of conduct came from five years of attending and discussing Council meetings with others and an overwhelming consensus that the level of civility and decorum on Council could be Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 9 Packet Pg. 75 6.4.a improved on, concerns that grew after the resignation of a few directors. This document evolved over four months and includes points borrowed from dozens of sources including parliamentary training by Ann Macfarlane. One question that has been asked and that she asked herself is what is the difference between a code of conduct and a code of ethics. A code of conduct is a set of principles concerning the transaction of business by municipal officers in a manner that is necessary for transparent and accountable government. Much of the ethic codes that apply to City Council come from RCW Title 42 related to public officers and agencies. An example is no municipal officer may use their position to secure special advantages or exemptions for themselves or others. Councilmember L. Johnson explained beyond a code of ethics is a code of conduct. Both concern behavior but a code of conduct is related to how elected officials agree to treat one another, staff and the public. The underlying theme of the code of conduct is respect; research has shown a lack of respectful engagement impedes government by stalling decisions, reducing employee recruitment and retention, discouraging public engagement and a feeling of apathy. The code of conduct document is a draft, a starting point to begin discussion. She hoped tonight would not be a revisiting of past perceived wrongs nor an invitation to air grievances, but instead an opportunity for Council to come together in agreement on a shared expectation of how to conduct themselves and hold themselves and each other accountable going forward. So it would not be too overwhelming, she suggested going section by section. Council President Fraley-Monillas said in discussing this with Councilmember L. Johnson, she suggested getting questions answered tonight and any amendments be proposed next week so Councilmembers have an opportunity to think about it. She was not sure there was enough time tonight to make amendments in a manner that made any sense. Councilmember L. Johnson read each section and Councilmembers commented. Section 6. Council Conduct. Councilmembers should seek to improve the quality of public service and ensure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective, open, and equitable operation. To this end, the following Code of Conduct for members of the Edmonds City Council is established: Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, whether the plan was to review and ask questions point by point or the document in its entirety. Councilmember L. Johnson answered her understanding was the discussion would be regarding each section. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned whether there should first be a philosophical discussion about behaviors and issues, recalling she had gathered several cities' codes of conduct and had worked with former Councilmember Joan Bloom on this topic in the past. Councilmember L. Johnson assumed that would come out of the discussion on the individual sections, but she was open to the Council's wishes. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the Council could go point by point through this long document. She referred to the email from former Councilmember Bloom who has talked with several Councilmembers and she considered her a local expert. Said preferred to hear everyone's opinion on the code of conduct and what they see as dichotomies, etc. and talk globally about the differences between this code of conduct and the old code and what other cities are doing rather than going through it point by point. Councilmember Olson said Councilmember L. Johnson put a lot of time and effort into preparing this version. Going through it point by point will allow Councilmembers to see where they come together and where there are differences. After do that is accomplished, she agreed with having a bigger, more philosophical discussion. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 10 Packet Pg. 76 6.4.a Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Olson. The point of tonight was to allow Councilmember L. Johnson an opportunity to explain where the information came from and have a deeper discussion next week with regard to amendments, acceptance of certain points, etc. Councilmember Paine agreed, she favored a point -by -point review and having a fuller discussion next week. 6.1 Conduct during Public Meetings A. Councilmembers have a public stage to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground, demonstrate effective problem -solving approaches, and seek solutions that benefit the community as a whole. There were no Council comments on this section. B. Councilmembers will practice civility and decorum in discussions and debates. Disagreements should focus on vision, policies, and their implementation. Mr. Taraday advised there a special meeting scheduled at 8:30 pm. He recommended formally extending the committee meeting to a time certain so that anyone waiting for the special meeting to start will know when they can watch the special meeting. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if the special meeting could be held and return to this meeting. Mr. Taraday answered that could create more confusion for anyone watching. He recommended keeping things in the same sequence but extending this meeting. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO EXTEND TO 9:15 P.M. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO EXTEND TO 9:30 P.M. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the Council can always extend again. This agenda item is only going through the sections, not amending or debating. The problem will be if the Council completes this item, the special meeting cannot begin until the time specified. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with 9:30 p.m. She plans to make comments on the proposed code of conduct based on her discussion with former Councilmember Bloom and did not plan to just agree with everything. If Councilmember L. Johnson planned to go section by section, she said Councilmembers should be allowed to comment like a normal vetting process. Councilmember Paine raised a point of order, the discussion is supposed to be regarding the motion. Councilmember Buckshnis said her comment was support for 9:30 p.m. based on what she thinks the objectives of this item are. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW THE MOTION. Councilmember Olson raised a point of order and suggested Councilmembers raise their hands if they have something to say about a section rather than Mayor Nelson asking each person. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken and he will try that method. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 11 Packet Pg. 77 C. Ensuring the public feels welcome is a vital part of the democratic process. No signs of partiality, prejudice, or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual Councilmembers toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony, Councilmember Paine asked if an "individual participating in a public forum" pertained to Councilmembers. Councilmember L. Johnson it was any individual. Councilmember Paine suggested inserting a discouragement of invidious (likely to arose or incur resentment or anger in others) language during Council meetings. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested replacing testimony with comments in the last line as there are few opportunities for citizens to share testimony but they do provide comment in various arenas. In response to Councilmember Paine, Councilmember Olson expressed concern about putting restrictions on speech to the point where people feel they do not have free speech. What words are invidious is often a matter of opinion; obviously, she would like everyone to speak gently to each other and especially to citizens, but she urged caution about restrictions as that can be a dangerous slope. Councilmember Paine said that language was taken from the judicial conduct commission's orders for how judges are supposed to operate on the bench. It is a reminder for all to look at more tempered language. Although she worried about restricting language, the Council needs to be thoughtful and not use language that incurs resentment or anger in others. D. Councilmembers shall prepare themselves for public issues and listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body during the meeting. Council discussions are open and transparent and diverse ideas and opinions are welcome. There were no Council comments on this section. E. Whenever possible, Councilmembers shall seek to minimize surprises at public meetings includingvetting of amendments or new ideas prior to introduction and/or discussion and should seek to provide key questions to staff ahead of public discussions. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern with this section, pointing out citizens are looking for a vetting process. As Councilmembers, oversight is vetting, and sometimes questions do not arise until during or after a presentations and she did not want Councilmember's voices to be stifled. She tries to get key questions to staff beforehand, but it is important for citizens to see the vetting process. There may be surprises and the intent of Council deliberation is to vet and provide oversight. She disagreed with the comment made last week about Councilmembers asking questions because vetting should occur during a Council meeting. Councilmember Olson agreed Councilmembers should have an open mind until the vote is taken and sometimes Councilmembers hear things during the meeting. It seems like the general idea is to seek to minimize and she suggested remove "whenever possible" as it was redundant. Councilmember Buckshnis' point that things will come up during the meeting and being responsive to things that arise during the meeting is a valid point. Council President Fraley-Monillas said "minimizing surprises," was intended to avoid a "gotcha" for staff, catching them off -guard with questions that were not asked before the meeting. She suggested adding language regarding representation at public events without prior authorization as it relates to conversations with citizens because that is a dangerous slope if Councilmembers are indicating they represent the Council when they may not. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 12 Packet Pg. 78 6.4.a Councilmember Distelhorst said Council President Fraley-Monillas' comment representation is addressed later in the document. With regard to this section, he read it similarly to Councilmember Olson, that Councilmembers shall seek to minimize and try to get questions answered beforehand. For items that arise during meetings, this in no way limits a Councilmember's right to ask questions of staff during the meeting. It establishes a guideline for best practice which respects the time at Council meetings as well as staff time. He appreciated the guidance especially as a new Councilmember. Councilmember K. Johnson said there were two issues; she supported seeking to minimize surprises at public meetings. She recalled when she was Council President, a Councilmember organized a public rally with hundreds of people speaking and she not informed beforehand which completely blew the agenda. Another time a Councilmember proposed a brand new idea without informing the Council in advance. In the past, if a Councilmember wanted to bring a new idea forward, they would announce it during Council comments to let others know they were working on a subject. She agreed with no surprises but the idea that amendments needed to be vetted, that had never been done in the eight years she has been on Council, it was not practical and would hamstring the Council. The Council receives the packet on Friday, leaving little time to vet amendments. She recommended removing the second sentence. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Mr. Taraday saying he likes to help the new Councilmembers with amendments. She did not have a problem with having amendments made at Council meetings. She feared the public would see this section as the Council was meeting behind the scenes instead of Councilmembers doing their best to ensure meetings run smoothly and sometimes amendments change during discussion. She agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson's suggestion. Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of clarification, her understanding was Councilmembers' comments will not be reflected in document, any changes will need to be made as amendments. Councilmember L. Johnson agreed. Councilmember K. Johnson asked what the point of tonight's conversation was if Councilmember L. Johnson was not listening and making changes. Mayor Nelson recalled the description at the beginning was to give Councilmembers an opportunity to comment on individual sections and at the next meeting Councilmembers could make actual amendments. Councilmember L. Johnson agreed, commenting the document is a big deal and was not intended to be a one and one; this was the beginning of the discussion. Councilmember Olson commented it is like the difference between a discussion item and an action item; it gives Council an opportunity to know where others are coming from, digest those thoughts and have more clarity regarding the sections prior to potentially making amendments next week. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned why the old code of conduct was inadequate. Councilmembers should try to have an open mind because some of this is very restrictive. F. While the Council is in session, Councilmembers shall neither, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council, nor disrupt any member while speaking nor refuse to obey the orders of the Council or the Mayor, except as otherwise provided in these Rules Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is against Roberts Rules as it combined the Council and the Mayor. The Mayor has one responsibility and Council has another and this restricts the Council's work product. She preferred to comply with Roberts Rules and agreed Councilmembers should be courteous, most have worked in the corporate world and know how to act. She questioned how "peace of the Council" or "disrupt any member while speaking" was defined. She did not understand the trigger points. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 13 Packet Pg. 79 6.4.a The old code of conduct said Councilmembers should listen courteously and attentively; she questioned the need for these restrictions. G. If a member is offended by the remarks of another member, the offended member should make note of the words used and call for a "point of personal privilege." The meeting chair will maintain control of this discussion and if deemed necessary, ask the offending member to restate their remarks. Councilmember K. Johnson said this is a misuse of Roberts Rules of Order; a point of personal privilege has to be timely and urgent and it refers to something like the room is too cold, I'm sick, call the doctor, or something like that, it does not give permission to speak. A Councilmember can only speak regarding the agenda topic. She referred to an article in Jurassic Parliament that states the bottom line is that the point of personal privilege does not allow for bloviating or indeed for any expression of your opinion. She recommended striking this section. Councilmember Olson agreed with striking this section. It is too subjective because what is offensive is clearly a matter of opinion. She viewed this as a dangerous free speech issue, commenting sometimes Councilmembers have to hear things they do not want to hear. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Olson, it can be difficult to determine what is offensive and a vote is taken to determine what is offensive. To Councilmember K. Johnson's point, instead of a point of personal privilege, it may be a point of order because the alleged comment would violate the code of conduct. She did a point of personal privilege earlier in the meeting for clarification, to clarify the intent of this item. She agreed everything in the document was very subjective which is why the Council votes. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson. She cautioned subjectivity can be dangerous for the Council. One of the biggest thing that happens is media sensation about how dysfunctional the Council is. The Council's role is to do their job, listen to what people say, and try to move things along. She has heard that one Councilmember does not like how she talks and another said they did not like a Councilmember's fluctuation of speech. When things reach that level, citizens are not seeing a functioning Council but a Council that is trying to find things wrong with each other. She cannot change someone else's perception of her, only they can change their own behavior. This section is getting into a dangerous situation where meetings will be interrupted for reasons like not liking what someone is wearing. She noted the point of personal privilege regarding Zach Bauder never made it into the minutes. Councilmember Distelhorst referred to the Jurassic Parliament training and the section on inappropriate remarks that include personal remarks, insulting language, vulgarity, attacks, inflammatory language, criticizing past actions with two exceptions and remarks that are not germane. Some wordsmithing may be necessary to 6.1.G but it is within what the Council received at the retreat in February. There may need to be more consistency with the language the consultant provided before it comes back to Council. H. It is important that each Councilmember is treated equally by their Council peers. All members are duly elected or appointed and should be afforded mutual respect. With the exception of the Council President's agenda-settingpower, no member has or shall be afforded extraordinga powers beyond those of other members. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked where that statement came from. Councilmember L. Johnson answered she would need to research what sparked it, where it was borrowed from or whether it was something she wrote; preparation of the proposed code of conduct has been a four -month process borrowing from many different sources so she was unable to say offhand. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 14 Packet Pg. 80 6.4.a Councilmember Buckshnis said this was a duplication of the code which addresses the Council President's agenda -setting power. It may be preferable to reference the code. Councilmember K. Johnson suggested a new section I, "Councilmembers should not communicate by text, email or handwritten messages during public meetings." Councilmember Olson expressed support for that addition. That has been brought up during OPMA training and is something Councilmembers could use a reminder on and it would be good to include in the code of conduct. Council President Fraley-Monillas questioned whether that would fall under the Council Rules and Procedures. The code of conduct is about Council conduct, not rules and procedures. Councilmember Paine supported Councilmember K. Johnson's suggestion. Councilmember K. Johnson said it was related to conduct. 6.2 Conduct with City Staff A. Councilmembers shall treat all staff as professionals with clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each person. There were no Council comments on this section. B. As feasible, Council Members will work with Department Directors or designees before meetings to obtain the information needed to participate in discussions and debates and to make decisions. Councilmember Buckshnis envisioned the Mayor, as the administrator of the City, would not be happy if seven Councilmembers attempted to get the same answers from department directors or designees. That is a functionality of getting questions answered beforehand and copying Councilmembers and having the vetting process occur during the Council meeting or committee. This would bog down the entire administration. She likes to have a complete packet with as much information. Councilmember K. Johnson recalled when the CARES funding was on agenda as an action item, she wrote several letters to Mr. Doherty to get information and he did not respond. If Councilmembers are encouraged to ask questions in advance of a meeting, there should be a like responsibility of the director to engage with that Councilmember either in writing or by phone. C. City Council policy is implemented through dedicated and professional staff. To support effective relationships, it is important that roles are clearly recognized. Councilmembers shall avoid intrusion into areas that are the responsibility of staff and recognize that it is not the role of the Council or its members to administer City business. Councilmember K. Johnson said Councilmembers often meet with staff or directors regarding an area of common interest to explore ideas. She did not consider that an intrusion, commenting those meetings are often by invitation. This section goes too far. Councilmember Paine suggested reversing the order of Sections C and B as C talks about policy which more closely follows A. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 15 Packet Pg. 81 6.4.a Council President Fraley-Monillas said what has happened in the past is there have been Councilmembers who barge into department director's areas or demand responses. She suspected that was the reason for this section. Councilmember K. Johnson said she respects the administration's role and the role of staff. She has been invited to many meetings by directors to discuss detailed areas of concern. Including this section goes too far and she never barges in. Councilmember Buckshnis said this is quite restrictive. She has talked to many directors over the years. She did not understand why these very extreme, subjective statements were being included when there hadn't been any problems. The statements are restrictive and subjective and she has a problem with it. With regard to the restrictiveness of this, Councilmember Olson said there are invitation at times and sometimes the Council helps staff and sometimes staff wants the help. She suggested rewording this section. As an example, when the City wanted to reach out to businesses to ensure they knew about the CARES Act funding, if a Councilmember was willing and had a volunteer team to distribute flyers and staff did not have time to do it, that would be a violation of this section as written. Council President Fraley-Monillas reread the section with emphasis, explaining she did not see voluntary assistance as a rule violation. She pointed out "intrusion" means barging in, not being invited. One of the reasons the last statement is included is this there have been instances over the years of Councilmembers going into directors' offices and telling them how they want something done which puts staff in a very uncomfortable position. She understood it was an uncomfortable statement but there was a reason for it. Councilmember Paine suggested wordsmithing the language to define a better practice. D. Councilmembers may ask Department Directors or designee about the status of work items or request information. Except through their participation on Council, they shall not expressly or implicitly give orders or direction, attempt to influence the decisions or recommendations of staff members. or otherwise be involved in administrative functions. Councilmember Buckshnis said she understands the difference between legislative and administrative. She receives many emails that are administrative in nature and she forwards them to administration. Someone could interpret something she says as an explicit order when she did not intend it that way. The language is subject to interpretation. In a Councilmember's role as oversight, sometimes there needs to be robust discussions between a councilmember, directors and/or the mayor. She did not support restricting interactions regarding process between the administrative and legislative branch to ensure both understood their roles. She referenced the old code of conduct which states, "conduct business in an open and transparent way, assist leading." Councilmember K. Johnson recalled this became an issue when Dave Earling was first elected and certain Councilmembers were asking for more information than he was willing to allow. Former Mayor Earling's rule was if a request was less than a certain number of hours, the director could do the work, but if it was over a certain number of hours, the Mayor's permission was required. She viewed the proposed language as an overly strict standard because there needs to be flexibility. Council President Fraley-Monillas disagreed. She reread the statement with emphasis, recalling a former Councilmember was banned from speaking to staff for this reason. She had a discussion with former Mayor Earling today to confirm that. This isn't about communication between Council and directors, it is about Council giving orders and direction to staff and influencing decisions. She agreed it could be Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 16 Packet Pg. 82 6.4.a subjective, and if that arose, she hoped the Mayor would point to this policy and inform Councilmembers they were not to give orders or direction to staff. Councilmember K. Johnson provided a personal example; when she was working on the proposed resolution regarding extension of transit service in Edmonds related to the Swift line, she met with the Mayor and asked for permission to contact the Public Works and Planning Directors to get some very specific information to support the work she was doing. There are instances and opportunities for Council to work collaboratively and as written this is too extreme. Councilmember Buckshnis said she could cite many examples back to days of former Mayor Cooper when things were tight, no one did anything and the directors did not want to change financials. Councilmembers need to be able to discuss anything with directors related to work, recognizing the difference between legislative and administrative. She asked Councilmember L. Johnson where she found this section. Councilmember L. Johnson said the information was pulled from many different documents and she was not prepared to cite where it came from. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Council President Fraley-Monillas helped her with this. Councilmember L. Johnson said no. E. Councilmember communications with City Staff shall be limited to normal City business hours, except in cases of emergencypre-agreed upon event or meeting held outside of normal City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of normal business hours should be expected no earlier than the next business day Councilmember K. Johnson asked if this meant Councilmembers were only allowed to send email to staff 9-5 Monday through Friday. This section says Council is not to have any communication with staff outside business hours; a phone call is one type of communication, she would not call staff afterhours but she will write emails beyond 9-5 Monday through Friday. Councilmember L. Johnson answered she looked forward to a suggestion to clarify. F. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of a City employee public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager. Comments about staff performance should only be made to the Mayor through appropriate correspondence. Councilmember K. Johnson said this is very extreme. During discussion about changing the hiring practices for the chief of police, she asked whose job it was to enforce the City code, whether it was HR director, the mayor or the city attorney. To say Councilmembers are never supposed to express concerns is too extreme. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was not only too extreme but also subjective. She asked what happened if employees were talking about Councilmembers which she has heard has happened. Mayor Nelson requested she refrain from using inflammatory language. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated this language is very restrictive and very subjective. The Mayor should already be aware and if he/she is not, something is wrong with the chain of administration. Legislators should not be involved with administrative functions. It is the Mayor's responsibility to ensure their employees are functioning properly and if they aren't, an executive session is held. She questioned whether this applied to everyone or just to Councilmembers and said it should apply to everyone. Council President Fraley-Monillas said staff and Council each have their own policies. She reread the proposed statement with emphasis. In other words, the Council is not in staff s chain of command. If Councilmembers have issues with staff, the chain of command is the Mayor and he/she speaks to the director. If the director has questions, they can reach out to the Council. She encouraged Councilmembers to read the section more carefully and not make assumptions. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 17 Packet Pg. 83 6.4.a COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXTEND FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (6-1) COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Buckshnis said it is not the legislative responsibility to do administrative work for the Mayor. The only person a legislative body should talk about is the legislative assistant and the city attorney because those are the only positions that work for the Council. This is an inappropriate statement and should not be in the code of conduct. The Mayor is the administrator and it is not the legislative role to criticize staff or comment on their performance. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the Mayor doesn't know what they doesn't know. If they don't know there are concerns, and concerns do arise on occasion, those concerns need to be expressed to the Mayor and allow them to handle it, not the Councilmember. Councilmember Olson agreed philosophically, this is all about the separation of legislative and executive so goes without saying. Her concern about including it is Councilmember K. Johnson's point about a Councilmember making an inquiry during a Council meeting that could be interpreted as critical and could limit conversation and being able to getting the answers the Council needs to make decisions. 6.3 Conduct with Council Legislative/Administrative Assistant A. Councilmembers shall treat the Legislative/Administrative Assistant as a professional with clear, honest communication that respects abilities, experience, and individual dignity. Additionally, Councilmembers are responsible for ensuring a supportive and positive work environment for the Legislative/Administrative Assistant. Councilmember Olson said Sections A and D are redundant as they repeat what applies to staff. She realized this was a contract employee, but much of the same things apply. She suggested a simple statement that the same respect that is extended to staff is extended to contract employees, and referencing the Edmonds City Code 2.03.010 and 1.02.031.13.3 and any contract terms. This whole section differed from what she would want to say. Council President Fraley-Monillas liked this statement, it makes it clear the position is a professional and they are to be treated respectfully. The council legislative assistant is a contract employee which is different from staff although some of the vacation and medical benefits are the same. B. Given the need for shared coordination, Councilmembers shall not request the Council Legislative Assistant to initiate any significant project or study, outside of limited research, without the consent of the Council President. The Legislative/Administrative Assistant's time will be divided equally among the seven Councilmembers. Councilmember K. Johnson said she submitted the amendment to hire a legislative assistant. For a while the Council debated whether it would be one or two jobs. When she was the Council President, she supervised the legislative assistant, but she had absolutely no ability to give consent regarding the work they were doing as that was considered inappropriate and each Councilmember had their own access and could request whatever they wanted. The intent was to divide the time equally, but that was changed in the contract last year. This requires additional discussion especially when the Council President can play favorites. Councilmember Buckshnis said this is already referenced in the ECC; she agreed with Councilmember Olson that some of this was very subjective, favoritism can occur, it can be restrictive, and if the Council President doesn't like you, your work doesn't get done. When she was the Council President, the council Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 18 Packet Pg. 84 6.4.a assistant had been in place a long time and knew how to divide up her time. Things got muddied up when Councilmember K. Johnson was the Council President and the Council needs to go back to how it is explained in the code. Councilmember Paine suggest defining "a significant project or study" with an hour amount. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to her recent email in response to allegations that there was unfavorable treatment. Her email stated the council assistant provides 20 hours/week of legislative assistance to Council, approximately 3 hours/week per Councilmember, and 20 hours/week of administrative work. As an example the project to compile a list of services for people in need took her about 40 hours and the Windward report required a great deal of time. The reason this section is included is to ensure that work is equal. She apologized if Councilmembers felt they had been treated unfairly; each Councilmember gets about 3 hours week for the council assistant to work on their projects. Councilmember Distelhorst inquired about ECC 2.03.010 Executive Assistant to Council. Mr. Taraday said there are two code sections, a section in Title 1 related to the Council President speaks to the responsibility to supervise. Councilmember Distelhorst said 2.03.010 does not contain any specificity regarding the position's division of time between Councilmembers. Mr. Taraday agreed neither the 20 hour/20 hour division nor the division of hours among Councilmember was in City code. Councilmember Distelhorst said under the current code, one Councilmember could use all the assistant's time if approved by the Council President. Codifying that the assistant's time will be divided equally among the seven Councilmember is a much fairer way to ensure that each Councilmember receives benefit from this position. Councilmember Buckshnis said the Windward project was not a good example because it was approved by all seven Councilmembers. The most important issue is transparency regarding who is doing what and where, recalling when Mayor Nelson was Council President, the assistant recorded their time by Councilmember. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed the council assistant keeps a record of how her hours are spend and a topic list. She is currently working on projects for Councilmembers Distelhorst, Johnson, and Olson. She has made it clear that the three hours/week is the only fair way to do it. She agreed there was nothing in the code but she heard allegations a while back that people were getting preferred treatment and getting extra work from the assistant. She told the assistant to divide the 20 hours into 3 hours a week per Councilmember. If a Councilmember doesn't want their three hours, the assistant adds it to a larger project she is working on. That is fairest way although it is a challenge to ensure everyone is treated fairly and respectfully. The only time the assistant deviates from that is if she is working on a gigantic project such as the Windward report which consumed at least 100 hours. This section clarifies the time will be equally divided among Councilmembers. The other 20 hours/week is administrative work. D. Councilmember communications with the Legislative/Administrative Assistant shall be limited to normal City business hours, except in cases of emergencypre-agreed pon event or meeting held outside of normal City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of normal business hours should be expected no earlier than the next business da. Councilmember K. Johnson said Councilmembers may wish to communicate via email after 5, on weekends or on holidays; it is too restrictive to limit communication to normal City business hours. For example, if she sends an email after business hours, she did not expect a response until the assistant was back at work. Limiting communication to the assistant's business hours is impractical. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 19 Packet Pg. 85 6.4.a E. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of the Legislative/Administrative Assistant in public or to the Legislative Assistant directly. Comments about performance should only be made to the Council President through qppropriate correspondence. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if each Councilmember would have their own legislative assistant because that was how this read. If a Councilmember had an issue with a project the assistant is working on, they should be able to speak to them in private. Councilmembers should all be able to have professional person -to -person conversations to resolve an issue. She should be able to talk to the legislative assistant because she is the Council's assistant. Council President Fraley-Monillas explained this is not about talking to the legislative assistant. It is related to expressing concern about the performance of the legislative/administrative assistant in public or directly to the assistant. Having comments about performance made to the Council President through appropriate correspondence puts it on the Council President to figure out what's going on if the assistant is not performing the way they should. Like it or not, the Council President is the assistant's supervisor. This is not about communication; direct communication can happen and everyone will have a level of disagreement. This is about the performance of the legislative assistant which has to go through their supervisor which is Council President. 6.4 Conduct with Boards, Committees, Commissions, and Outside Agencies A. The City maintains several boards and commissions as a means of encouraging and gathering community input. Citizens who serve on boards and commissions become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council or Mayor. They are a valuable resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested Section 1.04.050 Committee Functions addresses these issues. Council President Fraley-Monillas said this is related to Council conduct and their behavior toward boards and commissions and that is the difference between the code related to committees. B. Councilmembers are appointed as non -voting members to serve as the primary two-way communication liaison between the Council and boards, commissions, and committees. Councilmembers are not to direct the activities or work of the board, commission, or committee. Councilmember Buckshnis was confused by "not direct;" as a liaison a Councilmember acts as a sounding board. The Council liaison is interactive with the board/commission to assist them in achieving their mission. She did not understand the reason for this section because in a committee function the council liaison is an aid and helps direct their work. Councilmember L. Johnson said it was one thing to answer questions and clarify, and another to direct their activities. That is what this is saying, the liaison is not there to tell them what to do, but act as a liaison for clarification. Councilmember Distelhorst said his experience with another Councilmember as a co -liaison was very much related to listening and answering general questions versus directing their work. He suggested removing "outside agencies" from the title because when a Councilmember represents the City on an outside agency, they are voting members. Councilmember Buckshnis said in her opinion, advise was the same as direct; when you are advising someone, you are helping them. As Councilmembers become ingratiated in boards and commissions, they act as an advisors and help them. This language is very limiting. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 20 Packet Pg. 86 6.4.a Council President Fraley-Monillas said Councilmembers are not voting members of boards or commissions and are there to hear what they are working on and provide input if asked, but not to run the board or commission. She has heard from directors that in the past some Councilmembers think they are in charge of the board/commission. This clarifies the Councilmember's role to the board or commission. C. Councilmembers may attend any board or commission meeting to which they are not appointed but shall do so as a member of the public. Personal comments or positions, if given, will be identified as such and shall not be represented as the position of the City or Council. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed Mr. Taraday and she discussed this recently and if all Councilmembers are invited to boards and commissions, there is an issue with a quorum. Mr. Taraday said the Council may want to consider having a policy that requires notice to the Council President or council assistant to determine if there will be a quorum at a board/commission meeting. If a quorum of Councilmembers showed up to board/commission meeting/ event and even if they spoke as individuals and not as Councilmembers, if the subject related to City business, he was concerned it could be considered a quorum by the courts. Councilmember Olson asked if that was an issue if Councilmembers did not speak. Mr. Taraday said speaking was the primary concern; if a Councilmember was in attendance at a public meeting and did not speak, he had much less concern. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled having a guest Councilmember attend a meeting such when former Councilmember Teitzel made a presentation regarding plastic to the Mayor's Climate Protection Committee and Councilmember K. Johnson attended last week's at Tree Board. She questioned why a Councilmember could not attend a board/committee meeting to vet something through committee. She recognized some people cannot differentiate between a Councilmember and a citizen, but sometimes a Councilmember may want other Councilmembers to attend a board/commission meeting to vet their resolution or ordinance through the board/commission. She did not understand the purpose of this section when there have not been any problems with it in the past. Council President Fraley-Monillas said there was request recently for a Councilmember to be provided the time and dates of all boards and commissions so they can attend. The issue is not with two Councilmembers at a board/committee meeting, but issues with quorum arises when four Councilmembers attend. With regard to Mr. Taraday's suggestion that Councilmembers report their intent to attend a meeting, that could be problematic if the person they report to was on vacation or out sick. The only way would be to give public notice that there could be a quorum of Councilmember at every meetings. Most boards/commissions only have one Council liaison so having another Councilmember present is not a problem. A couple boards/committees have two Council liaisons; having a third attend is not a problem but a fourth creates a quorum. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXTEND FOR 15 MORE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested Mr. Taraday work with Councilmember L. Johnson or her to consider a way to ensure that too many Councilmember do not attend a meeting. She agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis, that a second Councilmember may want to attend a board/commission meeting. Councilmember Buckshnis said she made that request and Ms. Hope answered it superbly, saying a quorum could be an issue. She advised the council legislative assistant that she wanted to attend the Housing Commission and the Economic Development Commission. During this time of heightened Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 21 Packet Pg. 87 6.4.a anxiety, people have reached out to her and she was interested in learning what was going on. Recognizing that a quorum could be an issue, she had rescinded that request. D. Councilmembers shall not contact a board or commission member to lobby_ on behalf of an individual, business, or organization. It is acceptable for Councilmembers to contact the board, committee, or commission members in order to clarify or contextualize a position taken by he body. When making contact the relevant Council liaison should be included in such communication. Councilmember Buckshnis said this is more of an ethics issue. Councilmembers should never lobby for anything. E. When attending a non-citysponsored event, meeting, conference, or other activity, a Councilmember may be authorized to represent the Council only upon a majority vote of the Council. Likewise, a Councilmember may be authorized to represent the City only upon the express permission of the Maw Councilmember Paine suggested the addition of an Item F, "No Councilmember or group of Councilmembers may contact an outside agency to express a view that does not comport with the decision of the Council. Any Councilmember's correspondence to an outside agency must also be sent to the Council President and Mayor." She recalled an incident a couple years ago where a small group of Councilmembers provided a minority report to a state agency. If there is correspondence, a call, email, letter, etc. the Council President at a minimum needed to be alerted and probably all Councilmembers and the Mayor. Councilmember Buckshnis said that was an ethics issue. It has happened a couple of times. Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with Councilmember Paine's suggested addition. There was a minority report and then-Councilmember Nelson had a private meeting with the agency head, none of which was coordinated. Mayor Nelson requested she refrain from making personal remarks. Councilmember K. Johnson said four Councilmembers expressed a personal opinion or tried to lobby the state director which became a big problem and should be avoided in the future by having a rule in the code of conduct. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Paine's suggestion and said possibly it should fall under ethics. When the minority sent the letter in the past, nothing happened. Such a statement would make it clear that a group of Councilmembers do not have the authority to contact a public agency. Councilmember Paine welcomed additional input on this topic, noting there may need to be some law review as it combines both ethics and conduct. 6.5 Conduct via Technologic Communication A. Technology allows words written or said to be distributed far and wide. Written notes, voicemail messages, texts, and email are public records and should be treated as such. Councilmember Olson suggested deleting the letter A if there was no section B. 6.6 Compliance and Enforcement A. The integrity of individual councilmembers reflects, both positively and negatively, on the overall public perception of the ethical behavior of the entire Council and City. Councilmembers Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 22 Packet Pg. 88 themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that conduct standards are understood and met and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integri, of its government. Councilmember Olson said it seemed like big omission that the code of conduct did not address conduct between Councilmembers and suggested that be Section 6.6. and make Compliance and Enforcement Section 6.7. Conduct between Councilmembers should include something like "While disagreement on policy matters is to be expected, Councilmembers are responsible for creating a personally supportive...". Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order that the Council was considering Section 6.6.A. Councilmember Olson said her suggestion was for a section that would proceed this. Council President Fraley-Monillas preferred to discuss this section first. Mayor Nelson ruled point well taken and said Councilmember Olson could continue. Councilmember Olson continued, "...responsible for creating a personally supportive and positive work environment for each other. At a minimum, this would apply to respectful written communication and conduct in public meetings." B. The Council has a responsibility to intervene when actions of a member or members appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when a violation is brought to their attention. The City Council, by majority vote, may impose sanctions on members whose conduct does not comply with these standards. Sanctions may include any or all of the following; 1. Official verbal reprimand in an open meetin& 2. Formal public letter of censure by a majority vote of the council. 3. Loss of committee or external appointment assigmnent(s). Councilmember Buckshnis said this is very limiting, there are no definitions and it is very subjective. If a way could be determine where it would not be subjective, it may be helpful, but what one person considers a violation is subjective. As a former regulator and auditor with a deep voice and part of the loud family, she has been criticized for doing nothing more than talking. This contains a lot of subjectivity and it without definitions, it will degrade the integrity of the Council. Councilmember Olson was strongly opposed to an official verbal reprimand in an open meeting. General management and interpersonal rules of conduct subscribe to praise in public and criticize in private. To build a case for someone who repeatedly violates the code of conduct, there may be a desire for documentation and she was not opposed to that, where someone has a private conversation, documents it and sends it to the full Council via blind copy for the sake of documentation. This is subjective and is one person's opinion that there is a problem. That would be for all Councilmembers to consider in the future for a censure. The acting out in public and the drama it causes is not appropriate and does not improve the conduct of the Council. Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with the comments about definitions which may alleviate some of the subjectiveness. He did not subscribe to the criticize in private; he liked praise in public and preferred being constructive in private. He wanted to keep the code of conduct private and if offline conversations needed to happen, it could be done in a constructive manner that adheres to the code of conduct. Having some specificity regarding meaning would help everyone. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXTEND 5 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Fraley-Monillas said having conversation in private does not build confidence in the public, it has to happen in public. Her research found there had been one censure on the City Council in 20 years indicating this is something that is done lightly. If a Councilmember is inappropriate, there needs Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 23 Packet Pg. 89 6.4.a to be steps for taking action. There was an incident in the last year where she was asked if she intended to censure. She said no, if the behavior corrected itself, she wouldn't censure or take it to the Council. It depends on how heinous the incident is. The one time the Council did censure it was serious. A censure is not one person's view; technically 1-2 people write the censure, but a majority is required to pass it. Councilmember Buckshnis said she sent information out because a censure almost happened last year. This section is internally inconsistent, it talks about open communication, conduct and behavior, but it is restrictive. Citizens do not want to see the Council fighting. She asked if the Council could hold an executive session to discuss a censure. Mr. Taraday answered the Council would be allowed to have an executive session to discuss a possible censure. In fact, the one time that it happened, there was an executive session. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Council could have an executive session to have a discussion. Mr. Taraday explained an executive session can be held any time there is a complaint or change against a public employee or officer. Anything that would potentially rise to the level of a censure would certainly be enough of a complaint to warrant an executive session. Mr. Taraday clarified anything that could potentially warrant a censure would qualify as complaint for OPMA purposes. Councilmember Olson commented one-on-one conversations happen between Councilmembers regularly, but not in a public meeting. When someone is offended or has an objection, it is preferable to have a one- on-one conversation. It is often likely the person did not realize they had been offensive as there is such a difference of opinion between people. With regard to the official verbal reprimand, she commented there have been three in three months, and a great deal of division whether the verbal reprimand was the offensive behavior or whether the comment about the offense behavior was the offensive behavior. She did not want to include that language in the code of conduct and preferred it be a prohibition. She said censure is not defined, the level of infraction that would cause a censure is not defined, and majority is not the right level to approve a censure, it should at least be majority plus one. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO EXTEND FIVE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember L. Johnson said censure is a parliamentary procedure so it is difficult to have an additional definition. With regard to requiring a super majority vote, a censure is regarding the actions of one member and that person is allowed to vote although ethically they should recuse themselves. A super majority would require only one more dissenting Councilmember to defeat the census vote; therefore, she did not feel a super majority was not appropriate in this case. Council President Fraley-Monillas said there are circumstances that should require a censure. Perhaps the minority report is an example that should have resulted in a censure; abuse toward staff is probably grounds for censure. Exactly what behavior warrants censure is difficult to define; a censure is in parliamentary procedure and is used to take action regarding someone's inappropriate behavior. There are a lot of reasons for a censure; in 20 years the Council has done it once and has had the ability to censure for the last 10 years. With regard to her previous comments regarding a super majority, Councilmember L. Johnson clarified it would take the member being discussed and two other Councilmembers to defeat the censure vote. There was potential for a 4-2 vote if the person being discussed recused themselves but they were not obligated to. She did not support requiring a super majority vote. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there was a super majority vote for the censure that the Council did. She has information regarding the potential censure last year. Councilmember Olson pointed out the Council did not discuss the entirety of this code of conduct versus the existing code of conduct and who it affects. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 24 Packet Pg. 90 6.4.a Councilmember L. Johnson thanked the Council for the excellent discussion. The proposed code of conduct is a draft given to Council to amend. There were excellent examples tonight regarding how it can be strengthened. 5. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 25 Packet Pg. 91 6.4.a Public Comment for 8/11/20 City Council Meeting: From: Ken Reidy <kenreidy@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 7:28 AM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Judge, Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Taraday, Jeff <jeff@lighthouselawgroup.com> Subject: Public Comments: Packet Page 22 for the August 11th City Council Meeting Please see Packet Page 22 for the August 11, 2020 City Council Meeting. On that page you will see multiple examples of building encroachments into City Rights of Way. One can even see a building that encroaches into both a street right of way and an alley right of way. I once had a similar situation. On August 17, 2007, Duane Bowman notified the Reidy family that Thuesen had withdrawn his encroachment permit application and that all of Thuesen's improvements would be on his property. Mr. Bowman concluded his email as follows: The issue we are now faced with is that your clients have an accessory building located within the alley right of way. As I see it there are three potential options: 1. Move the building out of the right of way, or 2. Obtain an encroachment permit for the structure, or 3. Work with the property owners abutting the alley right of way and petition the city to vacate the entire alley right of way. As promised, your client's have the opportunity to present evidence to show that the building does not encroach into the alley right of way or the extent of the encroachment. Please let me know which course of action your clients would like to take. Thanks, Duane Bowman Development Services Director (425) 771-0220 It is very important that all elected officials understand that it was the City's idea to vacate the entire alley right-of-way as one option of dealing with what Mr. Bowman called "issues" related Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 26 Packet Pg. 92 6.4.a to Reidy's accessory building located within the alley right-of-way. We followed the City's advice and we let the City know which course of action we wanted to take. Please appreciate what happened to my family after following the City's advice. Please appreciate that Reidy owned 100% of the fee title to the property where my building was located. Thuesen had no ownership interest in the property. Please ask the City Attorney or the State Attorney General what would happen if a citizen with no ownership interest in the streets and alleys shown on Packet Page 22 for the August 11th City Council Meeting filed requests for Code Enforcement against all the owners of buildings that encroach into the streets and alleys and the related setbacks from such property lines. Please let me and all other citizens know if citizens with no fee interest ownership have standing to file setback related code enforcement requests. Please answer the question of standing as it relates to both opened and unopened rights of way. Thank you From: Joan Bloom <joanmbloom@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 6:37 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Proposed Council Code of Conduct Council, Since my email to you last week on the proposed Council Code of Conduct, I have spoken to five Council Members. From these conversations, it's clear that those involved disagree on what's disrespectful. Even those who support the new proposal disagree. I'm not surprised. We all have our own definition of disrespectful. As Council Members, how to spend the citizens' money is going to create disagreements, as it should. I'm convinced that NONE of the proposed Council Code of Conduct should be implemented. It is not Council's job to police fellow Council Members' behavior, with each other or with staff, and enforce compliance through sanctions. There is already a process to sanction a fellow Council member, and it is meant to sanction egregious actions, such as ethical violations, stepping outside of the role you were elected to perform, or acting independently of Council. I urge you to use your discussion time to clarify what problem(s) you are trying to solve. You don't need a code of conduct to agree that name calling or addressing a staff member or each other by first name in a Council meeting is not appropriate. Your time would be more effectively used by focusing on Council's role, the Mayor's role, and staff's role, in serving the citizens of Edmonds. A good starting point would be Mayor Nelson's June 23 public response to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 27 Packet Pg. 93 6.4.a Council member Kristiana Johnson's June 12 email to a staff member. That action on the part of Mayor Nelson was: (1) A clear violation of #7 of the existing Code of Conduct: "Assist leaders in controlling disrespectful and intimidating behavior." (2) Not within his authority as Mayor which is to administrate the COE, oversee staff, and ensure enforcement of our laws and ordinances. (3) An abuse of his role as facilitator of the meeting, a role that requires following rules of order, and does not allow the Mayor to participate in (influence) Council's decision making process without the express consent of the Council. This issue is not just about this Council. It is about all future Councils. The proposed Council Code of Conduct would damage the integrity of Council itself, and would irreparably interfere with each Council member's duty, and ability, to perform the role they were elected to perform. Thank you for your consideration of my input. Regards, Joan Bloom Edmonds is a gift. Let's show our appreciation. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 11, 2020 Page 28 Packet Pg. 94 6.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #243339 through #243496 dated August 6, 2020 for $767,803.62, claim checks #243497 through #243636 dated August 13, 2020 for $544,064.50 and wire payments of $156.13 and $16,588.31. Approval of payroll checks #64308 through #64361 dated July 31, 2020 for Law Enforcement Commissioned employees retro payments of $115,548.42, payroll direct deposit and checks #64362 through #64365 and #64371 through #64372 for $604,161.47, benefit checks #64366 through #64370 and wire payments of $640,616.23 for the pay period July 16, 2020 through July 31, 2020. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 08-06-20 claims 08-13-20 wire 08-06-20 wire 08-13-20 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 08-06-2020 payroll summary 08-05-20 payroll summary 08-05-20 b payroll police retro payroll benefits 08-05-20 Packet Pg. 95 6.5.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM City of Edmonds L 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .y Amoun 0 a m 243339 8/6/2020 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 2010551 FIRE INSPECTION & MONITORING Fire Inspection & Monitoring - U 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 m 165.6E Total: 165.6E ui 243340 8/6/2020 077877 ALLEY BELL MUSIC 08052020-AIIeyBell CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran U 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( a� 243341 8/6/2020 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC 6431376 AUGUST RETIREE PREMIUMS FIRE PREMIUMS �a 617.000.51.517.20.23.10 11213.2< o LEOFF PREMIUMS 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 8,231.7E m CL Total: 9,444.91 243342 8/6/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991850185 WWTP: 7/29/20 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels c 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 51.4E -ii Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1' > 0 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.4' a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax N 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.1.' o 1991850186 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 00 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE N 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 79.3� E 10.4% Sales Tax .2 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 8.2E U 1991850187 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS c FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 0 E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E U 10.4% Sales Tax +° Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243342 8/6/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 1991855518 .. ; 'f:'flw* PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 6.5.a Page: 2 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 3.0, 'D U d L 1.6" N 6.1- t U 6.1- c 6.1- c 6.1- 0 6.0£ >+ M a 0.6, u 0 0.6z > 0 L 0.6z a Q 0.6z N 0.6- o 00 0 V) 9.2� 9 19.1( 0.91 t U M Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243342 8/6/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 Tota I : 243343 8/6/2020 064452 ARMSTRONG SERVICES 3523 WWTP: 7/2020 JANITORIAL & DISIN 7/2020 JANITORIAL SERVICE: $880 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Jul 2020 COVID Disinfectant Service: 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total 243344 8/6/2020 077908 ART SPOT OF EDMONDS LLC 08052020-ARTspot CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 243345 8/6/2020 075523 ART WALK EDMONDS PWB-200018 BANNER PROGRAM REFUND PWB Public Works Banner Program - Aug 111.000.322.40.000.00 Tota I : 243346 8/6/2020 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 5090 alerton system-PW alerton system-PW 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Tota I : 243347 8/6/2020 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 116810 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 718 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 718 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 718 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 718 6.5.a Page: 3 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 1.9£ -0 245.4> m L_ T3 N 880.0( t U 520.0( 1,400.0( c d c �a 8,000.0( — 8,000.0( �a a E 100.0( 100.0( c �a 0 3,555.0( a Q 369.7, o 3,924.7, 0 w 0 V) 46.2( . �a U 46.2( aD 47.6" E U �a Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243347 8/6/2020 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 243348 243349 lii[:1;ON 8/6/2020 077878 BANGA BUSINESS INVESTMENTS LLC 08052020-BANGA Revel 8/6/2020 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 07292020 PO # Description/Account 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 718 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 668 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 668 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 668 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage # 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage # 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total DESIGN FOR HOLIDAY GRAPHICS, Design for holiday graphics $45, 6.5.a Page: 4 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 140.Of 'D U d 140.0 4.6, m z 4.8( u 4.61 c d c 42.9� 0 L 42.9E a 44.2E 135.7' ,- 0 135.7( 0 L 4.3z a Q 4.3z N 4.4E c 849.1: o E 8,000.0( 8,000.0( W E t U Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243349 8/6/2020 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 243350 243351 243352 243353 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8/6/2020 077879 BLOOM TRAINING & CONSULTING 08052020-Bloom 8/6/2020 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 8/6/2020 003074 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 8/6/2020 077243 BPAS 1188825 40229033 PO # Description/Account 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total : CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 607.10 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 607.10 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total PED WALK WAY LEASE #40229033 PED WALK WAY LEASE #40229033 111.000.68.542.31.45.00 Total 1000764824 BPAS ADMIN FEES VEBAADMIN FEES 001.000.39.518.61.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 111.000.68.542.61.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 VEBAADMIN FEES 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 Total 6.5.a Page: 5 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 420.0( -0 420.0( m L_ T3 N 8,000.0( 8,000.0( m c 654.6< 654.6: 0 L �a 2,213.7E a 2,213.71 E U 4- 0 319.5( > 0 135.0( a Q 27.0( N to 31.5( c w 0 31.5( E M 67.5( c 31.5( E 643.5( co Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 100 6.5.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM City of Edmonds a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 243354 8/6/2020 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 9231 9227 YOGA 9231 9227 ONLINE YOGA INSTRUC 0 m 9231 ONLINE YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 120.0( u 9227 ONLINE YOGA INSTRUCTION L 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 990.0( 9235 YOGA 9235 ONLINE YOGA INSTRUCTION 9235 ONLINE YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 z 270.0( v Total: 1,380.0( m c 243355 8/6/2020 077873 CAMPBELL, RITCHIE 2005427.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 200.0( Total: 200.0( o 0 243356 8/6/2020 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC ZKC0622 MS SURFACE PRO 15 256GB 8GB LCL ca MS Surface Pro 15 256GB 8GB LTE - 001.000.23.512.50.35.10 2,848.1( •� 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.35.10 296.2( c ZKRO567 MS SURFACE PRO WTY BUS PLUS 1i MS Surface Pro Wty Bus Plus NBD 3 c 001.000.23.512.50.48.00 530.1( a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 001.000.23.512.50.48.00 00.11 " ZLB0191 HP 3YR ELECTRONIC CARE PACK N HP 3 yr Electronic Care Pack Hardwa 0 001.000.23.512.50.48.00 335.9, o0 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.23.512.50.48.00 34.9z E ZLM7372 ADOBE ACROBAT PRO 2020 GOV is Adobe Acrobat Pro 2020 U 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 336.3z r- 10.4% Sales Tax E 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 34.9E U Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243356 8/6/2020 069813 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC (Continued) 243357 8/6/2020 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN03200976 RN04200972 RN05200956 RN06200956 RN07200957 243358 8/6/2020 073249 CG ENGINEERING, PLLC 42110 243359 8/6/2020 077869 CHAN, HEIDI 2005421.009 PO # Description/Account Total YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+HAZM) nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total TO 20-01.SERVICES THRU MARCH T.O. 20-01.Services thru March 15, 21 001.000.245.963 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 6.5.a Page: 7 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 4,471.71 0 U d L_ 60.0( N 6.21 60.0( c d 6.2z c �a 0 60.0( �a a 6.2z E U 60.0( o 7a 6.2z o L a a Q 142.7E o N 14.8E c 422.5E o w E 1,267.5( 1,267.5( E t U M Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243359 8/6/2020 077869 CHAN, HEIDI (Continued) 001.000.239.200 30.0( Tota I : 30.0( 243360 8/6/2020 065669 CITY OF BELLEVUE POLICE DEPT 8/28-8/30/2020 ADVANCED POLICE MOTORCYCLE MOTORCYCLE TRAINING - STRUM 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 65.0( Total : 65.0( 243361 8/6/2020 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I20003811 WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 792.0( Tota I : 792.0( 243362 8/6/2020 077882 CLAIRE'S PANTRY LLC 08052020-claires CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243363 8/6/2020 077126 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 2569377 GASB 68 PENSION REPORTING AS GASB 68 Pension reporting assistan( 001.000.39.519.90.41.00 689.8E Total : 689.8E 243364 8/6/2020 077906 COCOON CHILDCARE 08052020-Cocoon CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total : 8,000.0( 243365 8/6/2020 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC AUG-2020 C/A CITYOFED00001 Aug-2020 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 661.5� Total: 661.55 243366 8/6/2020 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 140.21 Page: 8 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243366 8/6/2020 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS (Continued) 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 Tota I : 243367 8/6/2020 077437 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES INC INV1206578 INV1206578 - EDMONDS PD 1 CASE BLACK NITRILE GLOVES - 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 Tota I : 243368 8/6/2020 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 12330 JUNE BACKGROUND CHECKS JUNE BACKGROUND CHECKS 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total 243369 8/6/2020 077870 DIGGS, JANET 2005423.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 243370 8/6/2020 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 20-4027 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MEINTUE, city council meeting minutes 7/28/20 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Tota I : 243371 8/6/2020 076172 DK SYSTEMS 25930 CITY HALL - LABOR & MATERIALS l CITY HALL - LABOR & MATERIALS l 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Tota I : 243372 8/6/2020 077911 DRIFTWOOD MODERN 08052020-driftwood CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 6.5.a Page: 9 Page: 9 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243372 8/6/2020 077911 DRIFTWOOD MODERN 243373 243374 243375 243376 8/6/2020 077903 DUMPLING GENERATION 8/6/2020 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 08052020-MianShiDai 1-107089 1-107681 1-107945 8/6/2020 073540 EDMONDS CHAMBER FOUNDATION 1033 8/6/2020 077883 EDMONDS FAMILY PANCAKE HOUSE 08052020-family panc PO # Description/Account 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total : CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES/ FHP FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES/ FHP 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: TORQUE WRENCH PM SUPPLIES: TORQUE WRENCE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: ENGINE OIL FILTER PM SUPPLIES: ENGINE OIL FILTER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total REIMBURSEMENT FOR WISH FUN[ Reimbursement for WISH Funds COS 001.000.39.565.10.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 6.5.a Page: 10 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 7,000.0( 'D 7,000.0( m L_ N 8,000.0( 8,000.0( m c d 71.9, c �a 10.5( — 0 8.5 , a E 268.4� 0 27.9, 0 0 L a 23.0, Q 2.4( N 412.8i c w 0 V) E 4,953.2- 'R 4,953.21 c a� E t 8,000.0( Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 11 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243376 8/6/2020 077883 077883 EDMONDS FAMILY PANCAKE HOUS (Continued) Total : 8,000.0( 243377 8/6/2020 077589 EDMONDS FOOD BANK 1005 REIMBURSEMENT FOR FOOD PUR Reimbursement for food purchases p 001.000.39.565.10.41.00 16,894.9, Total : 16,894.9: 243378 8/6/2020 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1718 PM SUPPLIES: THREAD RODS, NU' PM SUPPLIES: THREAD RODS, NU' 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.3" 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.1 £ 1722 PM SUPPLIES: SPRAY PAINT PM SUPPLIES: SPRAY PAINT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.9� 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.5, Total : 18.0( 243379 8/6/2020 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO R26344 SEWER - LIFT STATION MAINTENAI SEWER - LIFT STATION MAINTENAI 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 142.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 14.7 Total : 156.71 243380 8/6/2020 065789 ESTES, KEN 40 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 137.4� Total : 137.4< 243381 8/6/2020 077872 EVANS, BRUCE 2005425.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 150.0( Tota I : 150.0( 243382 8/6/2020 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH904131 ORDINANCE 4192 & 4193 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243382 8/6/2020 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) city ordinance 4192 and 4193 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 26.6( Tota I : 26.6( 243383 8/6/2020 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU59526 PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 48.4. 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.0z Total : 53.4< 243384 8/6/2020 071998 FOSTER, KELSEY BID-8418 BID/ED! COPYWRITING FOR JULY, BID/Ed! copywriting for July 20 article 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 243385 8/6/2020 071467 GATEWAY PET MEMORIAL WA70014-1-0035 INV WA70014-1-0035 - EDMONDS PI DISPOSAL OF 4 ANIMAL REMAINS 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 52.7, Total: 52.7, 243386 8/6/2020 011210 GC SYSTEMS INC 39542 WATER - PARTS WATER - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3,689.0( Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 15.8E 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 385.3" Total : 4,090.1 S 243387 8/6/2020 077885 GIFT LAND 08052020-giftland CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243388 8/6/2020 012199 GRAINGER 9593685887 PM SUPPLIES: HANDHELD MANOIV Page: 12 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243388 8/6/2020 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) 9601000749 243389 8/6/2020 076542 GRANICUS 129561 129658 243390 8/6/2020 077414 GROUNDSWELL STUDIO 2002-07 243391 8/6/2020 012560 HACH COMPANY 12048781 12048791 PO # Description/Account PM SUPPLIES: HANDHELD MANOIV 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 WWTP: PO 349 SHOWER & EYEWF PO 349 SHOWER & EYEWASH STA 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 Total CIVIC STREAMING ENCODER JULY civic streaming encoder for july 2020 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 CIVIC STREAMING, MINUTES & AG civic streaming, minutes and agenda 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 Total MARINA BEACH PARK RCO GRANT MARINA BEACH PARK RCO GRANT 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 Total WWTP: SODIUM NITRITE - NO PO SODIUM NITRITE - NO PO 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: PO 341 NITROGEN NITRTE PO 341 NITROGEN NITRTE 6.5.a Page: 13 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 251.0( u L_ 26.1' N m z 882.9( u 86.5' c 1,246.5i c �a 0 1,100.0( �a a 114.4( U 1, 417.5' o 0 147.4' o L 2,779.31 a Q 0 N 2,030.0( c 2,030.0( 00 0 V) E 76.3E c 7.9z E t U �a Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243391 8/6/2020 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 25.8,1 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2.6f Total: 112X 243392 8/6/2020 077810 HENCE LLC 604628067-001-0001 BL FEE REFUND BL fee refund for Hence LLC 001.000.257.620 125.0( Total : 125.0( 243393 8/6/2020 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN 42 REIMBURSEMENT REIMURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 116.3( Total : 116.3( 243394 8/6/2020 077913 HESLOP, BRENT BLD2020-0777 REFUND - PERMIT FEE (PARTIAL) BLD2020-0777 Heslop- 001.000.257.620 100.0( Tota I : 100.0( 243395 8/6/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 11616 WWTP: CAULK GUN, SPACKLING, I CAULK GUN, SPACKLING, ROLLER 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 106.7E 10.2% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.8� 5070380 WWTP: FACE MASKS (COVID SUPF FACE MASKS (COVID SUPPLIES) - 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 69.9z 10.2% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7.1 Total : 194.7z 243396 8/6/2020 077886 HONEST JOHNSONS LLC 08052020-honest john CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8.000.0( Page: 14 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243396 8/6/2020 077886 077886 HONEST JOHNSONS LLC (Continued) Total 243397 8/6/2020 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551643471 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total 243398 8/6/2020 077887 HOUSE WARES 08052020-housewares CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total: 243399 8/6/2020 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-072020 BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER JUL` BID/Ed! Program manager July 2020 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total: 243400 8/6/2020 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2020-07xs BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY FOR JULY BID/Ed! photography for July 2020 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total 243401 8/6/2020 077881 IMA'S STUDIO NAILS & SKIN 08052020-ckj/ima's CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total: 243402 8/6/2020 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3387136 SPONGES Scotch brite sponges 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 3389198 JULIAN AT -A -GLANCE APPOINTMEI Julian At -A -Glance Appointment Book 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 6.5.a Page: 15 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 8,000.0( 0 U d L_ 370.3E 370.3E m z v 8,000.0( m 8,000.0( c �a 2,766.6- o 2,766.6, a E 600.0( 600.0( 0 �a 0 L a a 8,000.0( Q 8,000.0( c N 0 w 8.6E U) E 0.9( 2 U c aD 30.8E E t U 3.2- Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243402 8/6/2020 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) 3390834 PACKING TAPE Packing tape 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 21.4� 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 2.21' 3390835 STORAGE BOXES Storage boxes 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 138.3E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 14.3� Total : 220.1: 243403 8/6/2020 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10075196 FLEET - SUPPLIES/ CABLE TIES & FLEET - SUPPLIES/ CABLE TIES & 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 88.5, 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 9.2- Total : 97.7F 243404 8/6/2020 063419 INTOXIMETERS INC 660556 INV 660556 - EDMONDS PD 34LTR DRY GAS TANK 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 133.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 51.2E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 19.1 1 Total : 203.4: 243405 8/6/2020 072627 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC 7012408 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT Monthly 911 database maint 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 200.0( Total : 200.0( 243406 8/6/2020 077909 JAMIESON, REID ALLEN HMP VIRTUAL CONCERT HAZEL MILLER PLAZA VIRTUAL CO HAZEL MILLER PLAZA VIRTUAL CO Page: 16 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243406 8/6/2020 077909 JAMIESON, REID ALLEN (Continued) 243407 8/6/2020 077876 JANA SCHNEIDER & KURT JACOBSEN 5-05825 243408 8/6/2020 077802 JATTA, ALYSSA 2005422.009 243409 8/6/2020 077875 JERRY & GAYLE FRANKLIN 2-20675 243410 8/6/2020 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC 6910 6940 243411 8/6/2020 077839 KIM, JENNIFER 2005417.009 PO # Description/Account 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total : #40247625-810-CJ4 UTILITY REFUN #40247625-810-CJ4 Utility refund du( 411.000.233.000 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total #773578RT UTILITY REFUND #773578RT Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Total UNIT 23 - BUCKET SEAT SET UNIT 23 - BUCKET SEAT SET 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 E174PO - PARTS E174PO - PARTS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 6.5.a Page: 17 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 650.0( -0 650.0( m L_ T3 N 1,428.8" y 1,428.81 v m c 185.0( -a 185.0( 0 L �a 341.9< a 341.9: E U 4- 0 269.0( > 0 11.9E a Q 29.2, N to 0 1,554.9� o 161.7, 2,026.81 c a� E t 138.0( u Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243411 8/6/2020 077839 077839 KIM, JENNIFER (Continued) 243412 8/6/2020 077889 LIFE POINT LAW PS 08052020-Iifepoint 243413 8/6/2020 074388 LONE MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS 22653 22654 22655 22656 22657 PO # Description/Account Total ; CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total INV 22653 - EDMONDS PD TEST RADIO - XTS3000 EP3459 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 ASSEMBLY MODULE 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 MODULE LC/FLAT 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 INV 22654 - EDMONDS PD TEST RADIO- MTS2000 EP3501 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 POTENTIOMETER / POT VOL/ON/OI 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 3P-MODE SWITCH 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 INV 22655 - EDMONDS PD TEST RADIO- MTS2000 EP3472 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 LCD DISPLAY KEY MODE 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 INV 22656 - EDMONDS PD TEST RADIO- MTS2000 EP3495 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 3P-MODE SWITCH 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 INV 22657 - EDMONDS PD TEST RADIO- MTS2000 EP3486 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 TOP/SIDE CONTROLS 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 6.5.a Page: 18 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 138.0( 0 U d L_ 8,000.0( 8,000.0( m z 45.0( m c 179.5( -a c �a 195.9E — 0 �a a 135.0( 22.5� 0 15.4( 0 0 L a 135.0( Q 195.9E N 0 00 135.0( N E 15.4( R L) c a� 135.0( E t U 39.7.E +° Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243413 8/6/2020 074388 LONE MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) 243414 243415 243416 243417 243418 8/6/2020 077890 LUNA MASSSAGE & WELLNESS 8/6/2020 077902 MAIN ST NAILS & SPA 8/6/2020 077871 MALONE, ERIC 8/6/2020 077888 MCKINNEY, JOHN W 08052020-lunamsg 08052020-main nails 2005424.009 08052020-mckinney 8/6/2020 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0248572-IN 0249446 PO # Description/Account 3-P MODE/TOGGLE SWITCH 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 DUAL FUNC. FREQUENCY CONTR( 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 POTENTIOMETER VOL/ON/OFF 001.000.41.521.40.48.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total E173PO - PARTS E173PO - PARTS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 E164PO - RETURNED PARTS E164PO - RETURNED PARTS 6.5.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 15.4( u 28.7E N 22.5E 1,316.21 v m c d 8,000.0( 8,000.0( 0 �a a 8,000.0( 8,000.0( •� 0 �a 150.0( c 150.0( a a Q 0 N 8,000.0( w 8,000.0( Go 0 V) E 2 1,804.8� U 187.7- (D E t U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243418 8/6/2020 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC (Continued) 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Tota I : 243419 8/6/2020 072859 MEHNDI MADNESS INC 08052020-mehndi CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 243420 8/6/2020 071538 MILLER, DIANE 2005447.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 243421 8/6/2020 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 331252 STREET - GREASE HEDGETRIMME STREET - GREASE HEDGETRIMME 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 331787 STREET - SUPPLIES/ DEFLECTOR STREET - SUPPLIES/ DEFLECTOR 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 Tota I : 243422 8/6/2020 077891 MODERN NAIL & SPA 08052020-modern nail CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 243423 8/6/2020 077866 MOSHER, TRINA 2005418.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 6.5.a Page: 20 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m -242.3f 'D U m -25.2( .L 1,725.0° ui m U 8,000.0( 8,000.0( c d c �a 295.0( — 295.0( �a a E 15.7, w 1.61 0 �a 0 a 42.9 , Q 4.4 1 N 64.8, 6 0 w V) 8,000.0( 8,000.0( c a� E t 105.0( u Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243423 8/6/2020 077866 077866 MOSHER, TRINA 243424 8/6/2020 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC 243425 8/6/2020 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) M E 164410 20-2775.00-4 243426 8/6/2020 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 5822506 243427 8/6/2020 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING 243428 8/6/2020 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 7 PO # Description/Account Total UNIT 14 - PARTS/ ELECTRONIC CO UNIT 14 - PARTS/ ELECTRONIC CO 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total EOGA.SERVICES THRU 6/30/20 EOGA.Services thru 6/30/20 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 Total PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total WILLOW CREEK GRANT WRITING Willow Creek Grant Writing thru July 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 Total 10268423 NAVIA FEES - JULY NAVIA COMMUTER FEE 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 10268424 NAVIA FEES - JULY FSA FEES 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 10592 NAVIA DISBURSEMENT OVERAGE 2018 BALANCE OVERAGE 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Tota I : 6.5.a Page: 21 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 105.0( 0 U d L_ 682.9( N 71.0, y 753.9: m c d 46,838.9� -a 46,838.95 0 L �a 218.8E a E 22.7E 241.61 c �a 0 1,062.5( a 1,062.5( Q 0 N 0 25.0( c V) E 116.2( u c aD 568.3- E 709.51 u Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243429 8/6/2020 077892 NORTHWEST TEA STATION INC 243430 243431 243432 8/6/2020 025690 NOYES, KARIN Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 08052020-nwtea CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 000 00 735 PROF SVCS (PLANNING) Planning Board meeting minutes (Mtc 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total 8/6/2020 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 68514958 8/6/2020 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER July, 2020 HEP B VACCINE HEP B VACCINE - SANCHEZ 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI• Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 Multi -Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 6.5.a Page: 22 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 8,000.0( 8,000.0( N m 247.0( v 247.0( m c a� 98.0( 98.0( — 0 L �a a 611.9- .E �a U 13,939.4E o �a 436.0( o a 107.21 Q 3,128.1E N 0 34.7, 0o0 0 V) 1,225.6( E 544.1 � U c 155.5z E t U 155.5z Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243432 8/6/2020 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 243433 8/6/2020 077835 OLYMPIC VIEW CREST HOA 243434 8/6/2020 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 243435 8/6/2020 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS Olympic View Crest 3685-483651 3685-483688 3685-484396 18-T1117572 PO # Description/Account Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis 001.000.237.170 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 Distracted Driving Prevention Acct 001.000.237.380 DNA Database Acct 001.000.237.400 Total REFUND TO NP ORG FOR BL FEE refund to non profit org for bl fee 001.000.257.620 Total UNIT 14 - PARTS UNIT 14 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET - PARTS FLEET - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 21 PARTS UNIT 21 PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 STORM - DUMP CUST# 5130 Total 6.5.a Page: 23 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 508.9E u 1.8- N 608.5( U 2.2; 4- m c 66.2,' m 21,526.1; �a 0 L 50.0( a 50.0( U 4- 0 129.9� 0 0 13.5, m a Q 16.5< N 0 1.7, 00 0 U) E 28.5� R U 2.9, y 193.3: E t U �a Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243435 8/6/2020 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS (Continued) STORM - DUMP CUST# 5130 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Tota I : 243436 8/6/2020 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 2550 INV 2550 - EDMONDS PD - CS 20-1, TOW BLACK AUDI - CS 20-17597 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 243437 8/6/2020 077894 PILATES EDMONDS LLC 08052020-pilates CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 243438 8/6/2020 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2020-0356 Q2-20 SUBSCRIPTION FEES 02-20 SUBSCRIPTION FEES 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 Tota I : 243439 8/6/2020 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Tota I : 243440 8/6/2020 077895 PUR SKIN CLINIC PLLC 08052020-pur skin CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Tota I : 243441 8/6/2020 077896 Q-NAILS 08052020-Qnails CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 6.5.a Page: 24 Page: 24 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 25 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243441 8/6/2020 077896 Q-NAILS (Continued) 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243442 8/6/2020 075769 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC N8403233 MAIL POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 5, mail postage lease 5/23/20 - 8/22/20 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1,542.6( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 160.4' N8412607 E-CERTIFIED LEASE 8/29/20 - 11/28 e certified lease 8/29/20 - 11/28/20 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 192.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 19.9 1 Tota I : 1,915.0( 243443 8/6/2020 077652 ROBERTS, CLIFF 2005409.009 REFUND: RENTAL/CLASS CANCELI REFUND: RENTAL/CLASS CANCELI 001.000.239.200 313.0( Total: 313.0( 243444 8/6/2020 077867 ROBERTSON, ANDREA 2005419.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 506.0( Total : 506.0( 243445 8/6/2020 065044 ROTARY CLUB OF EDMONDS PWB-200015 BANNER PROGRAM REFUND PWB Okboberfest- 111.000.322.40.000.00 100.0( Total : 100.0( 243446 8/6/2020 077897 S A BABIN DDS PLLC 08052020-SA Babin CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243447 8/6/2020 077899 SANGER INCORPORATED 08052020-sanger CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT Page: 25 Packet Pg. 120 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243447 8/6/2020 077899 SANGER INCORPORATED (Continued) CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243448 8/6/2020 077833 SARTORIUS CORPORATION 9112190727 WWTP: PO 348 PRINTER ROLLS, IV PO 348 PRINTER ROLLS, MOISTUR 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 587.4. Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 69.4� 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 68.3, Total: 725.2E 243449 8/6/2020 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 215206-1 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,913.9( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 199.0z Total : 2,112.9z 243450 8/6/2020 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 41 REIMBURSEMNET REIMBURSMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 5,475.0( Total : 5,475.0( 243451 8/6/2020 076850 SHOOBY DOO CATERING 08052020-shooby CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243452 8/6/2020 072214 SIGMA-ALDRICH INC 551037747 WWTP: PH WP & PH WATER - NO F PH WP & PH WATER - NO PO 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 72.1( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7.6, Page: 26 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 27 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243452 8/6/2020 072214 SIGMA-ALDRICH INC (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 8.2� Total: 88.01 243453 8/6/2020 077865 SKAGIT CITY TRUCKING SCHOOL 1768 INV 1768 - EDMONDS PD - ANDREV CLASS B CDL W/HAZMAT ENDORS 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 3,646.5( Total : 3,646.5( 243454 8/6/2020 036955 SKY NURSERY T-1630811 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 250.7E 10.2% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 25.5E T-1630817 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 256.7 10.2% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.1 Total: 559.25 243455 8/6/2020 073690 SMILEY-FAIRBANKS, MONA OTF FAIRBANKS OTF FAIRBANKS OTF FAIRBANKS 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 500.0( Total : 500.0( 243456 8/6/2020 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 3115 JUNE PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRA JUNE PUBLIC DEFENSE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 26,265.2, Total : 26,265.2 , 243457 8/6/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200124873 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.5" 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W Page: 27 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243457 8/6/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200493146 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201327111 PINE ST PARK PINE ST PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201557303 CEMETERY BUILDING CEMETERY BUILDING 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 201563434 TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 6.5.a Page: 28 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 17.1 u 46.6E m 495.9( m c a� 18.3, �a 0 18.3, `>, M a E 31.5, 0 18.0( 0 L Q a 157.7, Q 0 N 16.6( o w 20.8£ . �a U 34.9E (D E t 25.3 , Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243457 8/6/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201610276 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201703758 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201762101 415 5TH AVE S 415 5TH AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201929916 WWTP: 6/23-7/27/20 FLOWMETER 6/23-7/27/20 FLOW METER 23219 7. 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 202161535 CEMETERY WELL PUMP CEMETERY WELL PUMP 6.5.a Page: 29 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 30.9 - N 31.3E 8.5� c a� 32.6E 0 L 99.3E a E 27.8E u 4- 0 �a 19.3, o a a Q 30.1 E o N 0 20.0' c E 551.7, 19 c aD 151.9< E t U �a Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243457 8/6/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 202289096 202289120 202579520 202620415 204292213 204467435 220547582 220792758 243458 8/6/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Enroachment Agrmnt 243459 8/6/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Enroachment Agrmnt2 PO # Description/Account 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 WWTP: 7/1-7/31/20 ENERGY MGMT 7/1-7/31/20 ENERGY MANAGEME� 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 HAZEL MILLER PLAZA HAZEL MILLER PLAZA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 Total ENROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR enroachment agreement for engineer 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total ENROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR enroachment agreement for engineer 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 6.5.a Page: 30 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 248.1 E 'D r U d 50.4E N Y V m 48.4z v m c 9.71 c �a 20.0< p L �a a 70.1 f U 45 25.5� 0 �a 0 L 44.2E a Q 0 71.7E N 2,527.4i o w 0 E 108.5( R 108.5( c aD E t U 107.5( Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 243459 8/6/2020 075292 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE (Continued) 243460 8/6/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Lot Line Adj. 243461 243462 243463 243464 243465 243466 8/6/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Pedestrian Agrmnt 8/6/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE StormwaterAgrmnt 8/6/2020 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 2724 8/6/2020 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER July 2020 8/6/2020 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE 20-041 8/6/2020 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 Description/Account Total LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR PLAN lot line adjustment for planning 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total PEDESTRIAN AGREEMENT FOR El` pedestrian agreement for engineerinc 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total STORMWATER COVENANT AGRMN stormwater covenant agreement for 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total AUG-2020 COMMUNICATION DISPA AUG-2020 COMMUNICATION DISPA 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 AUG-2020 COMMUNICATION DISPA 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 AUG-2020 COMMUNICATION DISPA 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 Total Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 Total Q2-20 EMS BILLING & POSTAGE 02-20 Ambulance billings & postage 001.000.39.522.70.41.00 Total CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 6.5.a Page: 31 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 107.5( 0 U d L_ 198.5( 198.5( Y m 107.5( m 107.5( a0i c �a 110.5( o 110.5( a E 73,802.9( u 0 1,942.1 £ > 0 L 1,942.1 £ a 77,687.2E Q 0 N 0 321.1( c 321.1( E 14,019.5( y 14,019.5( E t U co Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243466 8/6/2020 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) 103584 103585 103586 103588 104757 243467 8/6/2020 077898 SPORT CLIPS 08052020-san sport c 243468 8/6/2020 077868 STIVELY, KEVIN 2005420.009 243469 8/6/2020 077532 STRANDED BY THE SEA INC 08052020-Stranded 243470 8/6/2020 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT 8585 8586 BEACH CAMP PO # Description/Account CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 WWTP:7/2020 RECYCLING Recycling + taxes 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 WWTP:7/2020 ROLLOFF ASH DISF 7/2020 Rolloff Ash disposal & taxes 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 8585 8586 BEACH CAMP 6.5.a Page: 32 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 689.51 u 38.7E Y m t 644.61 m c a� 605.1 f �a 0 459.8� `>, M a E 3,080.4E 5,518.5E 0 �a 0 L 8,000.0( a 8,000.0( Q 0 N 0 130.0( 00 130.0( N E M 8,000.0( 8,000.0( E t U �a Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243470 8/6/2020 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT 243471 8/6/2020 077900 SUSHI MOTO INC 243472 8/6/2020 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 243473 8/6/2020 077910 T&T SEAFOOD RESTAURANT Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8587 BEACH CAMP 08052020-sushi 25185 08052020-T&T 243474 8/6/2020 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18282757 243475 8/6/2020 077901 TERI'S TOYBOX 08052020-teris toy PO # Description/Account 8585 BEACH CAMP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 8586 BEACH CAMP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 8587 BEACH CAMP 8587 BEACH CAMP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total : CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total SEWER-HYDRORANGERS SEWER-HYDRORANGERS 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total FLEET - PARTS/ STEEL HEX CAP FLEET - PARTS/ STEEL HEX CAP 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 6.5.a Page: 33 Page: 33 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243475 8/6/2020 077901 TERI'S TOYBOX (Continued) 0 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 as 8,000.0( -0 Total: 8,000.0( m L_ 243476 8/6/2020 077907 THE WISHING STONE LLC 08052020-wishingston CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243477 8/6/2020 068105 THORSON BARNETT & MCDONALD PC 85498 MEBT SERVICES m MEBT PROF SERVICES a0i 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 288.0( Total: 288.0( 243478 8/6/2020 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR US53022 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI o ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI �a 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 400.8( a 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 41.6E 2 US53294 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-IS[ 4- ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISI 0 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,422.5 1 c 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 147.9E US53301 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE F. ANDE Q -- ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE FRANC[ c 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 N 1,293.5" co 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Go 134.5< c US53869 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C N E ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 _M 1,308.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 136.1 Total : 4,886.1 �a Q Page: 34 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243479 8/6/2020 077905 TREASURES OF TRAVEL 08052020-treasures 243480 8/6/2020 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 105874 243481 243482 243483 243484 8/6/2020 071549 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 8/6/2020 077912 VANITY LASH LOUNGE 48669073 08052020-vanity lash 8/6/2020 075762 VECA ELECTRIC & TECHNOLOGIES 99138 PO # Description/Account CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total ; WWTP: PO 347 CAUSTIC SODA FO PO 347 Caustic Soda for Nuvoda Trie 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total TERMINATE & TEST EXISTING FIBE Terminate & test existing fiber as per 512.000.31.518.87.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.41.00 Total 8/6/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9859254682 C/A 571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 6.5.a Page: 35 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 8,000.0( 8,000.0( N m 101.7E v 101.7E m c d 7,957.0( 827.5< 8,784Z5 a E U 8,000.0( o 8,000.0( 0 0 a a 3,985.0( Q 0 N 414.4z w 4,399.4z o9b 0 V) E 641.5� 36.8z a0i E s 199.11 U Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 130 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243484 8/6/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Maint 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 Air cards PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 6.5.a Page: 36 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 721.6f u L 265.5� N 397.4; v 328.8E Im- (D c 1,461.0E m c 235.5, f° 0 L 73.6E a 100.4( E 364.1 , ,- 0 100.4( > 0 L 50.2( a Q 357.9, N 90.2- c 00 0 1,704.4- E M 1,160.2� c 120.0< E t 26.9( Q Page: 36 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243484 8/6/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 9859384842 C/A 772540262-00001 Cradlepoint 1 - Court/IT 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 6.5.a Page: 37 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 7.6� u L 26.9( N 7.6� v 7.6-, m c 217.2E m c 50.2( f° 0 L 95.3 - a 95.3( E 337.2 - ,- 0 437.11 > 0 L 156.81 a Q 240.0E N 240.0E c w 0 690.9" E M 40.0- c aD 100.0- t U �a Q Page: 37 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 38 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243484 8/6/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 0 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 as 3.3' -0 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 3.3" .L Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 3.4( Y Trimble 1 - Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 t 10.0, U Lake Ballinger monitor 4" 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 48.9f c Total : 11,255.61 M 243485 8/6/2020 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH DRAN.FX.00056126 INV DRAN.FX.00056126- EDMONDS �a ANNUAL PENTOBARBITAL PERMIT o 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 55.0( j, Total: 55.0( a 243486 8/6/2020 075283 WAVE 3201-1027483-01 FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF High Speed Internet service 08/01/20 U 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 816.0( c Total: 816.0( 243487 8/6/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11843368 PARK MAINT: SUPPLIES 0 a PARK MAINT: SUPPLIES Q- Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 62.8( 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.5' to 11845439 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES G PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 00 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.8( E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.9< 11851054 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES c PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 229.7E 10.4% Sales Tax Q Page: 38 Packet Pg. 133 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.a Page: 39 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243487 8/6/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 0 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 as 23.8� -0 11855149 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES U PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 778.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 80.9E 11857078 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 125.6( c 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.0E Total: 1,362.8, 243488 8/6/2020 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7842 UTILITY BILLING - WINDOW & RETI 0 UTILITY BILLING - 5,000 #10 WINDC a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 247.8( UTILITY BILLING - 5,000 #10 WINDC 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 247.8' U UTILITY BILLING - 5,000 #10 WINDC 14- o 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 247.8z Fu 10.4% Sales Tax o L 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.7, 0- 10.4% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 25.7, c 10.4% Sales Tax N 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 25.7E to Total : 820.8: c 243489 8/6/2020 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000043571 TRAFFIC - SOLAR CHARGE CONTF V) E TRAFFIC - SOLAR CHARGE CONTF 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 254.6� Freight aD 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 15.3E E 10.4% Sales Tax U 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 28.0E Q Page: 39 Packet Pg. 134 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243489 8/6/2020 069691 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS (Continued) Total 243490 8/6/2020 077880 WESTWAY CLEANERS 08052020-CH westway CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 243491 8/6/2020 077380 WG CLARK CONSTRUCTION CO E7MA.Pmt 5 E7MA.PMT 5 THRU 6/30/20 E7MA.Pmt 5 thru 6/30/20 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 E7MA.Pmt 5 thru 6/30/20 126.000.64.594.76.65.00 E7MA.Pmt 5 thru 6/30/20 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 Total 243492 8/6/2020 075139 WSP USA SOLUTIONS INC 977689 E4FE.SERVICES THRU 6/26/20 E4FE.Services thru 6/26/20 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 Tota I : 243493 8/6/2020 077002 WTD EQUIPMENT P03939 UNIT 139 - JACK FOR HEIGHTADJI UNIT 139 - JACK FOR HEIGHT ADJI 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 243494 8/6/2020 077834 YACHT SPECIALISTS LLC 602694545-001-0002 REFUND FOR INCCORECT BL FEE partial refund for incorrect charge of 001.000.257.620 Tota I : 243495 8/6/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 6.5.a Page: 40 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 298.1; as U d L_ 8,000.0( 8,000.0( m 58,051.3E c d 32,712.4E -a c �a 49,152.6( — 139,916.4< �a a E 1,935.5, 1,935.51 c �a 0 L 459.9E a Q 40.0( N to 47.81 c 547.75 0 W E 75.0( +: 75.0( (D E t U �a Q Page: 40 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 08/06/2020 11:48:39AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243495 8/6/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Total: 243496 8/6/2020 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 33264 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total: 158 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total 158 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers 6.5.a Page: 41 W L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 42.1 f 'D U m 139.7, N m 139.71 m c 26.4, 348.11 �a 0 568.0( a 50.0( 64.2 0 682.2 , 0 0 767,803.6: a a 767,803.6: Q 0 N 0 00 0 0 E 2 V C E t V f6 Q Page: 41 Packet Pg. 136 6.5.b vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243497 8/13/2020 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account CM-2-1079 WRONG SIZE RETURNED - WRONG SIZE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-4310 INV-2-4310 - EDMONDS PD - MORR BAYLY UNIFORM HAT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 PLASTIC RAIN COVER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-4311 INV-2-4311 - EDMONDS PD - STRUM NEW NAME TAPE 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 VELCRO 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 PATCH REMOVE/INSTALL - 4 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 NEW NAME TAPE 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 PATCH REMOVE/INSTALLL - 3 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 SGT CHEVRONS 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 INV-2-4312 INV-4-4312- EDMONDS PD - INVEN- 3- BIANCHI 7907 OC POUCH - L 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 3- BIANCHI 7907 OC POUCH - SM 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 Page: 1 a� L 3 c .y Amoun o a m U m -11 8.9E :a N -11.9( m v 114.9E m c 4.0( m c 11.9( f° 0 L �a 8.0( E 5.0( 12.0( o 7i 8.0( o a a 9.0( Q 0 N 5.9f Cl) 4.8( c E M 89.9 c 86.9 t 17.6E Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 137 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243497 8/13/2020 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued) 0 INV-2-4313 INV-2-4313- EDMONDS PD - YAMAh SAFARILAND MAG/CUFF POUCH U 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 m 49.0( .L SAFARILAND CUFF POUCH - 2 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 79.9E 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 12.9( v INV-2-4318 INV-2-4318 - EDMONDS PD - MACH BLAUER L/S SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 79.9E BLAUER L/S SHIRT - 2 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 159.9E NAME TAPE 0 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.0( >% BLAUER S/S SHIRT a 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 74.9� NAME TAPE ca 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.0( u 10.0% Sales Tax 0 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 33.9( > Total: 762.1; o a 243498 8/13/2020 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 135385937 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL a Q ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12 c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 129.0E N 135385938 FIRE INSPECTION - CITY HALL Cl) fire inspection CITY HALL 121 5TH A` c 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 84.8E Total : 213.9' .E 243499 8/13/2020 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10667 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- _R U MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 234,999.3E E Total: 234,999.3E U co Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 138 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243500 8/13/2020 077968 ANIMAL MEDICAL CTR OF SEATTLE 568846 243501 8/13/2020 077966 APPLE CATHA LMT 243502 8/13/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 08122020AppleCathaMa WISTiE•1T11.11.1 1991859686 1991859687 1991869421 PO # Description/Account INV 568846 - EDMONDS PD- ACE SPECIALISTS EXAM - ACE 001.000.41.521.26.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total WWTP: 8/5/20 UNIFORMS,TOWELS Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1' 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 WWTP: 8/12/20 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1' 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 6.5.b Page: 3 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 155.0( u 155.0( .L N m 4,500.0( 4,500.0( m c a� 51.4E 1.4' �a a 5.3E 0.1E U 4- 0 Ta 61.1E p L a 6.3E Q 0 N 29.5E w 3.0 d N E 2 51.4E U c aD 1.4' E t U 0.1E Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 139 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243502 8/13/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 243503 243504 243505 8/13/2020 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 8/13/2020 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Tota I : 0231114-IN WWTP: PO 352 8/4/20 DIESEL FUE PO 352 8/4/20 ULSD #2 DYED - BUI 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 Total 117035 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing # 2906 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing # 2906 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing # 2906 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage # 2906 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage # 2906 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total 8/13/2020 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 66990 ROUGH BOX - MEYER ROUGH BOX - MEYER 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 Total 6.5.b Page: 4 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 5.3E u 216.9: •`— N m 852.8( 88.7( 941.5E c �a 187.0( �a a 187.0( 192.E U 0 563.5E 0 563.5( a a Q 18.8E .r 0 N 18.8� w 0 19.4E N 1,751.0: •E R U c 586.0( E 586.0E U �a Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 140 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243506 8/13/2020 077935 AVERSANO, TONY 243507 8/13/2020 076685 BAILEY, MICHAEL E 243508 8/13/2020 077937 BANNISTER, DERRICK 243509 8/13/2020 077944 BERGSTROM, BRIAN 243510 8/13/2020 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 243511 8/13/2020 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 2005494.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 080720 MIKE BAILEY FACILITATION OF JUL Facilitation for four hour Budget 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 Total 2005496.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 2005497.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005504.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 0012418 WWTP: 6/20-7/24/20 NUVODA PILO 6/20-7/24/20 NUVODA PILOT TEST 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total 761470 UNIT 31 - PARTS/ MODULE UNIT 31 - PARTS/ MODULE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.1 % Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 761551 UNIT 49 - PARTS/ ADAPTOR & GA& UNIT 49 - PARTS/ ADAPTOR & GASI 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.5.b Page: 5 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 960.0( u 960.0( .` N m 600.0( 600.0( m c a� 960.0( 0 960.0( a 1,920.0( U 4- 960.0( o 960.0( c L Q a Q 3,279.31 o 3,279.3' a� w 0 87.2� . �a U 8.8, aD E z 41.4z u Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 141 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243511 8/13/2020 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 243512 8/13/2020 077952 BLACKBURN, ERIC 243513 8/13/2020 077917 BLEVINS, KIRK 243514 8/13/2020 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 243515 8/13/2020 077934 BOCZKIEWICZ, STEVE 243516 8/13/2020 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.1 % Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 2005512.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005467.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 2005468.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 1188134 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 510.20 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 510.20 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1189660 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 708.0 GAL FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 708.0 GAL 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total 2005493.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 5699116 ROADWAY - ASPHALT ROADWAY - ASPHALT 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 6.5.b Page: 6 Page: 6 Packet Pg. 142 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243516 8/13/2020 076240 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 243517 8/13/2020 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP 243518 8/13/2020 077933 CASTALDO-MARSH, CARISSA 243519 8/13/2020 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 243520 8/13/2020 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # (Continued) 7135 2005491.009 Description/Account Total PROF SERVICES Professional Services for Housing 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total ZNW5042 LG EXTERNAL DVD DRIVE LG GP65NB60 External DVD Drive - 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 ZPL2326 HP SB USB-C DOCKING STATION HP SB USB-C Docking Station - Qty 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 ZPL4151 HP SB USB-C DOCKING STATION HP SB USB-C Docking Station - Qty 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 Total: LY292184 PM: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SI PM: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE St 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 LY292368 FLEET - SUPPLIES FLEET - SUPPLIES 6.5.b Page: 7 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 396.21 0 U d L_ 13,299.7- 13,299.71 m 87.0( m 87.0( a0i c �a 144.3E o �a 15.0- a E U 2,686.0( o 279.3E > 0 a a 1,448.31 Q 0 N 150.6< 4,723.7, 0 E M 373.7� Z c 38.8 , E t U co Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 143 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243520 8/13/2020 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 61.4,' 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 6.4E Total: 480.5E 243521 8/13/2020 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING JULY 2020 JULY 2020 - EDMONDS PD JULY 2020 DRY CLEANING CHARGI 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 534.7z Total : 534.7' 243522 8/13/2020 077945 CRUZ, TRAVIS 2005505.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 960.0( Total : 960.0( 243523 8/13/2020 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2020070032 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098 Scan Services for July 2020 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.0( Tota I : 285.0( 243524 8/13/2020 077838 DORAN, ISABEL 2005492.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 129.0( Tota I : 129.0( 243525 8/13/2020 077922 DOTTER, KASSIDI 2005477.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 86.0( Total : 86.0( 243526 8/13/2020 077916 ED MCCARTHY PE PS FLOWER POLE ART FLOWER BASKET POLE ARTWORV FLOWER BASKET POLE ARTWORV 127.200.64.573.20.41.00 300.0( Tota I : 300.0( 243527 8/13/2020 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PWB-200006 BANNER PROGRAM REFUND PWB Page: 8 Packet Pg. 144 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243527 8/13/2020 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (Continued) 243528 243529 243530 243531 243532 243533 243534 8/13/2020 077884 EDMONDS FRAME DESIGN & ATELIER 08122020BMercerdbaEF 8/13/2020 077955 EDMONDS MONTESSORI LLC 08122020EdmMontessor 8/13/2020 077958 EDMONDS VISION CENTER PS INC 08122020EdmVisionCen 8/13/2020 077954 ELEGANT GEMS BRENT MALGARIN GG 08122020EIegantGemsB 8/13/2020 077929 ELI, MARTA 8/13/2020 077965 ESC REMODEL LLC 8/13/2020 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 2005487.009 08122020ESCRemodelLL EDH904555 PO # Description/Account Edmonds Classic Car Show, Septeml 111.000.322.40.000.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total LEGAL AD Legal Ad: PLN2020-0036 (Nick STojH 6.5.b Page: 9 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 100.0( U 100.0( .` N m 8,000.0( v 8,000.0( m c a� 8,000.0( 8,000.0( o 0 �a a 8,000.0( .E 8,000.0( 0 �a 8,000.0( o 8,000.0( a Q 0 N 316.0( 316.0( c V) E 2 U 8,000.0( 8,000.0( a0i E t U �a Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 145 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243534 8/13/2020 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) 243535 8/13/2020 077918 EVERETT, BRIANA 2005471.009 243536 8/13/2020 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU59681 243537 8/13/2020 077941 FEGLER, BRIAN 2005501.009 243538 8/13/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PO # Description/Account 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total : REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total WWTP: PO 343 MR33400MC CAN L MR33400MC CanLiner 30X40- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 0894231 WATER - PARTS/ 1/2 C VISE WATER - PARTS/ 1/2 C VISE 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 0898116 WATER - INVENTORY/ PARTS WATER INVENTORY 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 WATER PARTS 6.5.b Page: 10 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 47.6( -0 47.6( m L_ T3 N 150.0( 150.0( m c d 55.7( -a c �a 5.7� _ 61.4< �a a E 695.0( 695.0( o �a 0 L 125.0( a Q 54.7E N Cl) 18.7( w 0 833.7' M 86.7- 100.4- t U �a Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 146 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243538 8/13/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 243539 8/13/2020 077770 FIOR, DANA 243540 8/13/2020 077946 FOLLANSBEE, FRANK 243541 8/13/2020 071998 FOSTER, KELSEY 243542 8/13/2020 077923 FRITZ, JENNIFER 243543 8/13/2020 077943 GAETA, JOE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0898116-1 WATER INVENTORY - PARTS WATER INVENTORY - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 0902721 WATER INVENTORY - PARTS WATER INVENTORY - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 Tota I : 2005466.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005506.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Tota I : 08122020KelseyFoster CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Tota I : 2005481.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005503.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 6.5.b Page: 11 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 965.5, 'D U m L 833.7; N 86.7- 7,568.0� c aD M 787.Of 11,460.4E sa 0 �a a 191.0( 191.0( 0 Ta 1,920.0( o 1,920.0( a a Q 0 N 5,000.0( 5,000.0( 0 E M 150.0( Z 150.0( aD E t U sa 960.0( Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 147 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243543 8/13/2020 077943 077943 GAETA, JOE (Continued) 243544 8/13/2020 077942 GARZON, JOSE 2005502.009 243545 8/13/2020 077939 GEE, DARYL 2005499.009 243546 8/13/2020 077950 GILVIN, SCOTTY 2005510.009 243547 8/13/2020 012199 GRAINGER 9603086662 243548 8/13/2020 077959 GREEN LEAF MASSAGE THERAPY 08122020GreenLeaf Mas 243549 8/13/2020 077948 GRIFFITH, TROY 243550 8/13/2020 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 2005508.009 1045304 PO # Description/Account Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ BATTER FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ BATTER 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total OLD PW - SECURITY OLD PW - SECURITY 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 6.5.b Page: 12 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 960.0( 0 U d L_ 960.0( 960.0( m z 960.0( m 960.0( a0i c �a 695.0( o 695.0( a E 145.8( ,- 0 15.1 > 160.9 , o a a Q 0 8,000.0( N 8,000.0( w 0 E 960.0( 960.0( c a� E t U 55.0( Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 148 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 13 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 243550 8/13/2020 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS (Continued) 0 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 5.7< u Total: 60.7: L- 13 243551 8/13/2020 069629 HARVEY'S LOUNGE 08122020MundaydbaHar CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total : 8,000.0( m 243552 8/13/2020 076810 HAUGHIAN, NICHOLAS HAUGHIAN 08/20 EXPENSE CLAIM SWAT TRAINING - a0i PER DIEM EUGENE, OR 7/12-7/24/2 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 740.0( Total: 740.0( — 0 243553 8/13/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1161977 FAC MAINT SHOP -PRESSURE WA: L FAC MAINT SHOP - PRESSURE WA a 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 878.9, .E 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 89.6E o 1161981 SHOP - RETURN OF PRESSURE W, SHOP - RETURN OF PRESSURE W, > 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 0 -799.0( a 10.2% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 -81.4� .r 22682 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES N CITY HALL - SUPPLIES Cl) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.4E o 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.2E E 3012564 PUBLIC SAFETY - COVID/ COURT E R PUBLIC SAFETY - COVID/ COURT E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 45.9E 10.2% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.6� 3014003 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES FOR FLOOE a Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 149 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243553 8/13/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) CITY HALL - SUPPLIES FOR FLOOE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3014061 STREET - SUPPLIES/ CONCRETE N STREET - SUPPLIES/ CONCRETE N 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 3053261 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ YELLOW PR( TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ YELLOW PR( 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 3070801 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4011156 FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES/ TOC FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES/ TOC 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4013939 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES CITY HALL - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4020931 WATER - SUPPLIES/ GRASS SEED WATER - SUPPLIES/ GRASS SEED 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.5.b Page: 14 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 264.9E u L 27.0, N m z 44.4( u 4.5' c c 5.9E 0 L 0.6" a E 71.4E .i w 7.2c 0 0 0 L 118.9( a Q 12.1< o N A 42.2E c 4.3- c 51.9E E t 5.3( Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 150 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243553 8/13/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 5043826 COVID/ HAND SANITIZER STANDS COVID/ HAND SANITIZER STANDS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5074204 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES FOR FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES FOR 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5096278 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ MAIL ROOK CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ MAIL ROOK 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6010870 COVID / HAND SANITIZER STANDS COVID / HAND SANITIZER STANDS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6021871 UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7012076 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ DOOI PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ DOOI 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7623267 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES F.A.C. - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 6.5.b Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 41.9, 4.3E m 144.3E m c 14.7' M c �a 15.2, 0 L 1.5E a E 105.41 u 0 10.7E > 0 L Q a 46.5E Q 0 4.7E w 0 17.0E 2 1.7z U c a� 18.2- E U �a Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 151 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243553 8/13/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 8021646 9615684 243554 8/13/2020 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551651051 243555 243556 243557 8/13/2020 077957 HUGHES TRADING INTERNATIONAL 08122020HughesTradin 8/13/2020 070097 INLAND TECHNOLOGY INC 96331 8/13/2020 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 3284104 PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total FLEET - COVID ADDITIONAL HONE' FLEET - COVID ADDITIONAL HONE' 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total INV 96331 - CUST 25216 - EDMOND IT-30 PARTSWASHER 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 23 GAL. CLEANING SOLVENT 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 Total MEMBERSHIP LBjorback Membership (Member #01 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 6.5.b Page: 16 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 1.8E 'D r U d L_ 38.61 N 3.9z v 110.9E a� 11.3, 1,418.1E sa 0 �a a 131.6E E 131.6E 0 Ta 8,000.0( o 8,000.0( a a Q 0 N 1,777.4E Cl) 00 756.9< o E 263.5E 'R 2,797.9E c a� E t 145.0( Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 152 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243557 8/13/2020 069349 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL IN (Continued) Total : 0 145.0( 0 243558 8/13/2020 077914 JAMIE MANN & SHANE MANSON 2-00800 #500103559-NB UTILITY REFUND #500103559-NB Utility refund - receN p 411.000.233.000 187.0( Total : 187.0( 243559 8/13/2020 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 828717 WWTP: PO 179 8/3/20 SODIUM HYF z PO 179 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 8 v 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 3,672.9( c WA Hazadous Substance Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 25.7- 10.4% Sales Tax �a 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 381.9E _ Total : 4,080.55 �a 243560 8/13/2020 077932 KELLEHER, SAMANTHA 2005490.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( a REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( E 001.000.239.200 150.0( 2 Total: 150.0( o 243561 8/13/2020 077925 KIM, SUE 2005483.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: fd REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 0 L 001.000.239.200 150.0( a Total: 150.0( Q 243562 8/13/2020 077874 LACY & PAR INC 77930 PROF SERVICES 0 N Housing Commission Mailing- Cl) 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 1,114.2' c Postage V) 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 879.7E .E 10.0% Sales Tax f° 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 107.8' +: 77931 PROF SERVICE W Housing Commission Survey- E t 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 3,044.2( U Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 153 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243562 8/13/2020 077874 LACY & PAR INC 243563 8/13/2020 066522 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC 243564 8/13/2020 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 243565 8/13/2020 077928 MATENDA, ALINAFE 243566 8/13/2020 077962 MCGRAW INDUSTRIES LLC 243567 8/13/2020 077930 MCLAUGHLIN, QUINN Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Tota I : 131912 WATER - EZ STREET ASPHALT WATER - EZ STREET ASPHALT 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total 4667198 SHREDDING SERVICES JULY 2020 shredding services july 2020 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 shredding services july 2020 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 4667324 INV 4667324 - ACCT 2185-952778-8 SHRED 3 - 65 GAL TOTES 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Tota I : 2005486.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 08122020McGrawlndust CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 2005488.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Tota I : 6.5.b Page: 18 Page: 18 Packet Pg. 154 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 19 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 243568 8/13/2020 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0248537-IN E182PO - PARTS 0 m E182PO - PARTS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,360.3- u Freight L 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 414.9E 10.4% Sales Tax Y 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 184.6: 0249602 E172SO - PARTS (RETURNED REF1 v E172SO - PARTS (RETURNED REF4 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 213.0" c 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 22.1 E 0249824 E172SO - RETURN ORIGINAL INVO E172SO - RETURN ORIGINAL INVO 0 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 -203.2- `>+ Total: 1,991.81 m E 243569 8/13/2020 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 41676465 WWTP: PO 323 HOSE FITTINGS, CI PO 323 HOSE FITTINGS, CLAMPS, U 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 793.3E o Freight �a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 15.7E o 10.4% Sales Tax a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 84.1E Q Total: 893.25 c N 243570 8/13/2020 077947 MEYER, BRANDON 2005507.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( o0 001.000.239.200 960.0( N Total: 960.0( E .ii 243571 8/13/2020 071538 MILLER, DIANE 2005464.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( U REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 135.0( E Total: 135.0( �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 155 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 20 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 243572 8/13/2020 072151 MLA ENGINEERING PLLC 4040 FAC MAINT - EVALUATE EXISTING I 0 m FAC MAINT - EVALUATE EXISTING I 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 2,344.0( u Total: 2,344.0( 243573 8/13/2020 075590 MOBILE GUARD INVO0604256 NETGUARD ANNUAL SERVICES 7/1 N NetGuard Annual Service 7/01/20 - m 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 211.9� v Total: 211.95 m 243574 8/13/2020 077915 MURADYAN, TSOVINAR FLOWER POLE ART FLOWER BASKET POLE ARTWORV a0i FLOWER BASKET POLE ARTWORV 127.200.64.573.20.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( — 0 243575 8/13/2020 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0586740-IN WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\ L �a WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\ a 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 242.6E .E WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\ fd U 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 242.6E o 10.4% Sales Tax —a 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 25.2z c 10.4% Sales Tax a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.2' Q 0586941-IN TRAFFIC - 36" FLAGGER SYMB TRAFFIC - 36" FLAGGER SYMB N 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 292.3E Cl) 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 30.4( 0587688-IN TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES N E TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES M 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 88.8( 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.2' E Total: 956.5E �a Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 156 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 21 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 243576 8/13/2020 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 110882078001 INV 110882078001 - ACCT 9052043� 0 m 12 BX-PAPERMATE BLACK PENS -1 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 77.81 u 10.4% Sales Tax L 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.1( 110883517001 INV 110883517001 - ACCT 9052043� STAPLES - 5 BOXES -DISCOUNT 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 26.9" v 1.5 X 2 - POST IT NOTES - 12/PK 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.Of c PAPER CLIPS - 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 5.6( PAPER CLIPS - LARGE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.1 E o 10.4% Sales Tax `>+ 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 �a 5.0 1 a Total: 139.75 243577 8/13/2020 077389 OLYMPIC ELEVATOR COMPANY 10595 MUSEUM - HOOKED UP SMOKE SE U MUSEUM - HOOKED UP SMOKE SE o 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 692.0( 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 71.9 1 a Total: 763.9, Q 243578 8/13/2020 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION N HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 11226.4( c 0060860 HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 124.3, R Total: 1,350.7, }U, c 243579 8/13/2020 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-484447 UNIT 88 - PARTS aD E UNIT 88 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 49.4z Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 157 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243579 8/13/2020 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 243580 8/13/2020 077927 OVERTURF, CABIN 243581 8/13/2020 077931 PARK, CJ 243582 8/13/2020 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 243583 8/13/2020 069633 PET PROS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 2005485.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005489.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Tota I : 2008 INV 2008- EDMONDS PD - CS 20-15 TOW ACURA- CS 20-15337-2.5HR; 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 2ND TRUCK/ EXTRA MAN CHARGE 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 436 INV 436 - EDMONDS PD- HOBBS DOG FOOD-HOBBS 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 437 OVER CHARGED - INV180 OVER CHARGED - INV 180 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 487 INV 487 - EDMONDS PD - HOBBS DOG FOOD-HOBBS ti.5. b Page: 22 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 5.1z u 54.5f .L N m 75.0( 75.0( m c a� 75.0( 75.0( — 0 L �a a 460.0( .E �a U 92.0( o Ta 57.9( o 609.9E a a Q 0 N 94.9E Cl) 9.9, o V) E -180.4E c -18.9f E t U M Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 158 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243583 8/13/2020 069633 PET PROS 243584 8/13/2020 074793 PETDATA INC 243585 8/13/2020 077940 PETERS, JASON 243586 8/13/2020 072384 PLAY-WELLTEKNOLOGIES 243587 8/13/2020 064167 POLLARD WATER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8840 2005500.009 9243 LEGO ONLINE PO # Description/Account 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 Total : INV 8840 - EDMONDS PD 35 ON YEAR LICENSES @ $4.20EA 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 ONE REPLACEMENT TAG 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2 LATE FEES COLLECTED @ $2.5& 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 9243 STEM CHALLENGE WITH LEG 9243 STEM CHALLENGE WITH LEG 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total WP011438 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 WP011475 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 WP011479 WATER - SUPPLIES 6.5.b Page: 23 Page: 23 Packet Pg. 159 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243587 8/13/2020 064167 POLLARD WATER 243588 243589 243590 243591 8/13/2020 075769 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) N8412606 8/13/2020 070789 QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES INC 60617 8/13/2020 077964 RAVENNA PRESS 8/13/2020 077936 REYNOLDS, KIRA 08122020Raven naPress 2005495.009 PO # Description/Account WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total : UB FOLDING MACHINE LEASE 5/30 UB FOLDING MACHINE LEASE 5/30 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 UB FOLDING MACHINE LEASE 5/30 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 UB FOLDING MACHINE LEASE 5/30 422.000.72.531.90.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.48.00 Total WWTP: NO PO, RECERTIFY LAB W NO PO, RECERTIFY LAB WEIGHTS 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 6.5.b Page: 24 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 52.2,1 u L 5.4; 494.3 , m v 193.5E d 193.5E �a 193.5E o L 20.1 < a E 20.1 < 'ij U 4- 20.1 z 0 641.1 z 0 L a a Q 231.0( .r 0 N 14.7E 245.7; o0 0 E M 5,000.0( MM 5,000.0( r- E t U �a Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 160 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243591 8/13/2020 077936 REYNOLDS, KIRA 243592 8/13/2020 077967 RICHARD & CYNTHIATOMKINS 243593 8/13/2020 077920 ROBERTSON, MAY 243594 8/13/2020 077938 ROHRENBACH, SETH Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 1-13850 2005474.009 2005498.009 243595 8/13/2020 077953 RUN FOR GOOD RACING COMPANY 08122020-RunforGoodR 243596 8/13/2020 077960 SARAN'S PET CARE LLC 243597 8/13/2020 077951 SCHWAAB, DAVID 243598 8/13/2020 077424 SEFAC USA INC 08122020Sarah'sPetCa 2005511.009 17111535 PO # Description/Account 001.000.239.200 Total : #20-208927 UTILITY REFUND #20-208927 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total FLEET - MOBILE TRUCK LIFT PART FLEET - MOBILE TRUCK LIFT PART 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.5.b Page: 25 Page: 25 Packet Pg. 161 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243598 8/13/2020 077424 SEFAC USA INC (Continued) Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.7,' Total: 429.3° 243599 8/13/2020 077921 SHIN, JULIA 2005475.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 880.0( Total : 880.0( 243600 8/13/2020 077924 SHORE, CORAL 2005482.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 200.0( Tota I : 200.0( 243601 8/13/2020 076831 SKAGIT SHOOTING RANGE LLC 757 INV 757 - EDMONDS PD HAND GUN QUAL - 7/27/20 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 60.0( 8.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 5.1( Tota I : 65.1( 243602 8/13/2020 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/44522766 FLEET - POLARTEK DUAL AC MACE FLEET - POLARTEK DUAL AC MACE 511.000.77.594.48.64.20 12,867.8( 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.594.48.64.20 1,338.2E Total: 14,206.0E 243603 8/13/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202554 WWTP: 7/8-8/4/20 FLOWMETER 10( 7/8-8/4/20 FLOW METER 2400 HIG 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 16.0' 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 89.1 £ 200493153 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W Page: 26 Packet Pg. 162 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243603 8/13/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200663953 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200913853 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201054327 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201103561 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201501277 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201532926 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201711785 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15( STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202499539 LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.5.b Page: 27 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 33.6E u 73.9E m U 16.0E m c a� 28.5' �a 0 35.7, `5% M a E 18.4E 0 126.1 0 L Q a 8.6, Q 0 N 26.8� w 29.81 .E ca U 419.9, y E t U �a 3,955.0- Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 163 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243603 8/13/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 204714943 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 221593742 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 222398059 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - 6.5.b Page: 28 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 110.5E N 13,536.9, 378.8' c d M 0 L 120.0< a E 60.0( u 4- 0 �a 15.2( o a a Q 95.5< c N Cl) 20.1 1 c U) E 126.2� U c aD 63.8E E t U �a Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 164 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243603 8/13/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 243604 8/13/2020 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 2020-6412 243605 8/13/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Critical Area Notice 243606 8/13/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Liens UB 243607 8/13/2020 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Utility Easement 243608 8/13/2020 072776 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DIST 4787 243609 8/13/2020 063267 SOMERS, JIM 243610 8/13/2020 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 2005465.009 103587 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 Total : INV 2020-6412 EDMONDS PD - INM, INMATE MEDS JUNE 2020 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 Total VISTA DEL MAR CRITICAL AREA NC vista del mar critical area notice 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total LIEN & RELEASE OF LIENS FOR Ul liens for utility billing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 liens for utility billing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total EBB TIDE CONDO UTILITY EASEME ebb tide condo utility easement 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 Total STORM - RAINGARDEN MAINTENAI STORM - RAINGARDEN MAINTENAI 422.000.72.531.40.48.00 Total REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC 6.5.b Page: 29 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 66.1 � 'D 19,477.0E m L_ N 12.3 m y 12.3 , m c 106.5( 106.5( 0 L �a 214.5( a E 214.5( 429.0( c �a 0 105.5( a 105.5( Q 0 N Cl) 1,495.0( c 1,495.0( 2 U 200.0( y 200.0( E t U �a Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 165 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243610 8/13/2020 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 243611 243612 243613 243614 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8/13/2020 077956 SPROUTS PRESCHOOL & CHILD CARE 08122020SproutsPresc 8/13/2020 077961 STAR HAIR & NAILS 8/13/2020 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE 8/13/2020 077617 STILEY, HEIDI 08122020StarHair&Nai PO # Description/Account PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total L137932 07-2020 AUDIT FEES 07-2020 Audit Fees 001.000.39.514.20.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 111.000.68.543.30.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 423.000.76.535.80.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 511.000.77.548.68.41.50 07-2020 Audit Fees 512.000.31.518.87.41.00 Total 2005469.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 6.5.b Page: 30 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 1,022.9z u 1,022.91 N m 8,000.0( v 8,000.0( m c a� 8,000.0( 8,000.0( o 0 �a a 12,975.0z .E �a U 481.7, o �a 5,334.4� o a 2,862.4, Q 7,511.5E N Cl) 734.1( 0 950.7E E M 276.2E 31,126.41 E t U �a Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 166 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243614 8/13/2020 077617 STILEY, HEIDI (Continued) 001.000.239.200 35.0( Tota I : 35.0( 243615 8/13/2020 077919 SWITZER, JENNIFER 2005473.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 247.0( Total : 247.0( 243616 8/13/2020 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18282758 FLEET - PARTS FLEET - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 87.1 < 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 9.0E 18282759 STORM - SUPPLIES/ UPSIDE DOWI STORM - SUPPLIES/ UPSIDE DOWI 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 115.3� 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 12.0( Total: 223.5f 243617 8/13/2020 077926 THWING, CHRISTY 2005484.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 430.0( Total : 430.0( 243618 8/13/2020 077717 TSUKIMURA, ELIZABETH 2O05472.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 155.0( Total : 155.0( 243619 8/13/2020 077963 TWIST YOGA 08122020TwistYoga CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES Fund Business Support Gran 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total: 8,000.0( 243620 8/13/2020 070774 ULINE INC 122385682 INV 122385682 - CUST 2634605 - El Page: 31 Packet Pg. 167 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 32 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243620 8/13/2020 070774 ULINE INC (Continued) 1 CASE TYVEK BOOT COVERS/50 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 90.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 11.5" 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 10.5E Total: 112.0, 243621 8/13/2020 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 290974 WATER - PARTS WATER - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 102.4- Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.2, 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11.2( Total: 118.8f 243622 8/13/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9859801046 C/A 442201730-00001 iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 35.1 , Total: 35.1, 243623 8/13/2020 064649 VERMEER NW SALES INC W09874 WATER - 2 1/2" MOLE REPAIRS WATER - 2 1/2" MOLE REPAIRS 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 149.8( 9.9% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 14.8z Tota I : 164.6' 243624 8/13/2020 077619 VEZZONI, PETER 2005513.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 960.0( Total : 960.0( 243625 8/13/2020 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8801775573 WWTP: PO 357 PIPETTES, BOTTLE Page: 32 Packet Pg. 168 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 6.5.b Page: 33 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 243625 8/13/2020 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC (Continued) 0 PO 357 PIPETTES, BOTTLE HDPE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1,175.5' u 10.4% Sales Tax L 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 122.2E Total: 1,297.7E m 243626 8/13/2020 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 65516 INV 65516 - EDMONDS PD - CS 20-- v TOW HONDA - CS 20-15787- 1.51-11R; 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 276.0( 10.5% Sales Tax (D 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 28.9f -a 65573 INV 65573 - EDMONDS PD - CS20-1 TOW BLUE SUZUKI - CS 20-17984 0 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 184.0( 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.3, Total : 508.3( 243627 8/13/2020 074291 WALNUT STREET COFFEE 08122020WalnutStCoff CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT c CARES Fund Business Support Gran Ta 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( p Total: 8,000.0( a a 243628 8/13/2020 077798 WASSERMAN, MELISSA 2005470.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( Q REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( N 001.000.239.200 788.0( Cl) Total: 788.0( o 0 243629 8/13/2020 070156 WATERSHED INC 0081237-IN INV 0081237-IN - CUST ED250 - EDI E WATERSHED RAIN JACKET - BORE 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 554.0( WATERSHED RAIN JACKET - SHIEF 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 572.0( E WATERSHED RAINPANTS - SHIER t 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 325.0( Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 169 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243629 8/13/2020 070156 WATERSHED INC (Continued) WATERSHED RAINPANTS - BORST 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 Tota I : 243630 8/13/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11858792 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Tota I : 243631 8/13/2020 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH 1962230 INV 1962230 - EDMONDS PD JUNE & JULY RANGE FEES 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 Tota I : 243632 8/13/2020 069605 WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS 2020-EDM-JUL 243633 8/13/2020 068798 WESTGATE CHAPEL 243634 8/13/2020 076999 WIMAN CORPORATION PWB-200016 00064626 PROF CONSULTING Plan Reviews performed by Consultai 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 Total BANNER PROGRAM REFUND PWB Free Thanksgiving Dinner, Nov 16-23 111.000.322.40.000.00 Total PM: DOG BAG ROLLS PM: DOG BAG ROLLS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.5.b Page: 34 Page: 34 Packet Pg. 170 vchlist 08/13/2020 8:40:41 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243634 8/13/2020 076999 WIMAN CORPORATION (Continued) 243635 8/13/2020 077949 WRIGHT, KEONI 2005509.009 243636 8/13/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 206-188-0247 425-774-1031 425-776-1281 425-776-2742 140 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 140 Vouchers in this report PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total ; REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRA[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIALACC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Total Bank total ; Total vouchers 6.5.b Page: 35 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 216.9( u 2,302.5( N m 100.0( 100.0( m c a� 270.6" 270.6" �a a 47.5( •� U 0 59.3E 0 L a 26.4, Q 0 N 544,064.5( Cl) 544,064.5( o V) E 2 U c aD E t U �a Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 171 6.5.c vchlist 08/0 6/2020 12 :10 : 49 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8062020 8/6/2020 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 0091 US BANK - EMILY HR OFFICE SUPPLIES - AMAZON 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 a 0 0 156.1' m 156.1; 15 N 156.1; c 0 L Q G 2 V 4- 0 El N O 00 O d L 3 El Page: 1 Packet Pg. 172 6.5.d vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 1558 BLUEBEAM, OCEAN SYSTEMS, NU Zoom - additional access for Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 Bluebeam - Standard User and An= 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Amazon - Club3D CSV-1546 USB-C i 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 BulkRegister.com - Domain name 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 Ocean Systems - Quick DME Tel/Ren 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Intel NUC Barebone system, Intel 66( 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 Amazon - Computer headset 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 Amazon - 3 button USB wire mouse - 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 BulkRegister.com - Domain name 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 Amazon - Laptop Sleeve case 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 1885 PD TRAINING #2 08/06/20 FOOD FOR SEARCH/RESCUE 20-4, 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 COFFEE - SEARCH/RESCUE 20-41� 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 2519 PD #1 CARD -2519 08/06/20 SHIP TO WSP TOX LAB 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 PATROL CAR KEY DUPLICATION 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 2985 WWTP: PO 332 GARBAGE BAGS Amazon: PO 332 Garbage Bags 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 0 a d 0 152.3E m =a 2,748.9E Y m 450.1E u 127.0E aD 1,694.0( c �a 672.3( o 35.3, a 71.6E 33.0E IS 15.0E o L a a Q 51.7, c N 59.2z 0 0 m 20.3< '3 111.0,CD E t U 47.01 Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 173 vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 3048 THOMPSON CC -3048 8/6/20 PLASTIC CLIPBOARDS FOR CLERK 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 2 - 6 PACKS SHARPS CONTAINERS 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 FUJITSU SCANSNAP FOR CLERKS 001.000.41.521.11.35.00 HEPA FILTER REPLACEMENT FILTE 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 PEN/PENCIL CUP HOLDERS 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 COURT RECORDS FOR CPL APPLI 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 TEKTON WRENCH SET - ARMORY 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 SET PLASTIC CLIPBOARDS - CLER 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 RUBBER APRON FOR ARMORY 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 SHOES FOR CEBAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 HEPA FILTER REPLACEMENT FILTE 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 MORRISON SMART PLAQUE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 5 SAFARILAND RESTRAINT CUTTE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 TAPE AND SCISSORS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 GOLD CARDSTOCK FOR CERTIFIC 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 5 ROLLS DYMO ADDRESS LABELS 6.5.d Page: 2 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 4.8� m L 14.8� ui Y m 69.2( 441.5� m c a� 39.3z c �a 28.6E o 17.0( a 23.4, •� U 14.8� o R 19.7E o L a 154.5E Q 0 39.3z N M 65.8E o0 0 m 79.7E 3 33.6, E 37.5z U �a a Page: 2 Packet Pg. 174 vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK (Continued) 3314 3915 10 4171 4697 4787 4929 PO # Description/Account 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 LAWLESS -3314 08/06/20 BUSHNELL TRAIL CAM DATA PLAN 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 SHOPE US BANK American Planning Assoc. 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 American Planning Assoc.- 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 SHOPE US BANK Exact Data - Mailing list for Housing 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Book for SHope: Missing Middle Hou 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 MCCLURE -4171 08/06/20 MONTHLY CANVA GRAPHICS SUBS 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 COPY ROOM SUPPLIES Stapler for 3rd floor copy room 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 DAWSON CC -4787 08/06/20 HOUSING HOMELESS CLIENT 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 DEV SVCS US BANK Amazon: Office Supplies 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 MRSC: Webinar registration for Perm 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 The Seattle Times - subscription (July 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 6.5.d Page: 3 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 61.4( m L 9.9� =a N Y -830.0E t c aD 1,860.0( 46.5( �a 4.& a E 2 U 12.9E o �a 0 39.7( a a Q 4.1< 0 N M 416.2E ao 0 m 25.4E 3 c 105.0( E t 50.5( Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 175 vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Amazon: Blueprint for Greening 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Adobe: Creative Cloud subscription 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 Adobe: Creative Cloud Subscription 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 Zoom: monthly subscription (7-24/20 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 Amazon: Misc supplies (replacement 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Amazon: Misc supplies (replacement 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Amazon: Office Supplies 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Amazon: Case/keyboard for iPad 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 Amazon: Binders 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 4929 AMAZON CREDIT MEMO 3 RING BII AMAZON - Credit memo for 3 ring bir 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 5639 PAYFLOW PAYMENT PROCESSOR Payflow payment processor 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 Payflow payment processor 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 Payflow payment processor 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 6.5.d Page: 4 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 35.0( m L 29.9� `a N Y 29.9E t 199.9( w m c 23.9E 3.71 154.7 , �a a 88.9E E 118.9E U 4- 0 37.6< 0 L 27.0, a Q 9.2. o N M -99.8( ao 0 m L 13.2< 3 c 13.2' E t 13.2z Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 176 vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 7573 SMITH CC -7573 08/06/20 COURT RECORDS - CPLAPPLICAN 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 9573 COVID-19 BUDGETING STRATEGIE COVID-19 Budgeting Strategies webi 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 9821 GREENMUN CARD -9821 08/06/20 FUEL CITY VEHICLE - HAUGHIAN S 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 K-CUP COFFEE FOR TRAINING & L 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 K-CUP TEA FOR TRAINING ROOM 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 AVERY LABELS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 FUEL CITY VEHICLE - HAUGHIAN S 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 SECURITY SEALS & KEY TAGS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 HAUGHIAN HOTEL - SWAT TRAININ 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 PELICAN CASES, CAMERAS (3) 001.000.41.521.40.35.00 FUEL CITY VEHICLE - HAUGHIAN S 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 HAUGHIAN HOTEL - SWAT TRAININ 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 256 GB FLASH DRIVE DETECTIVES 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 PROJECTOR - TRAINING ROOM/EC 001.000.41.521.40.35.00 VELCRO CABLE STRAPS - ARMOR' 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 TEXTBOOK FOR MACHADO CLASS 6.5.d Page: 5 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 12.4� =a N 120.0( m t 29.5- m c aD 98.4, c �a 44.2 - — 0 8.1- sa a 36.7, .E R U 66.2• o R 1,000.0( o L a 788.0� a 32.9- N A 459.4z a& 0 m 74.3z 3 3,531.7( CD 9.4£ �a a Page: 5 Packet Pg. 177 vchlist 08/13/2020 10 :17:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8132020 8/13/2020 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 SPRAY GLUE FOR RANGE 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 AXON BWC INSTRUCTOR TRAININ, 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 KEYS - RANGE INST. AMMO LOCKE 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 6.5.d Page: 6 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 86.1 13.9 =a 299.0( ui Y m 22.8 16,588.3- m 16,588.3- y 16,588Z �a 0 L Q C G V 4- 0 0 L Q a N M O d 3 c as E M a Page: 6 Packet Pg. 178 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number a0i E STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB >+ a WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 y L_ STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA 3 SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC N 0 STR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC m STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB U a� STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB Y SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project (Phase 7) c516 EBGA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA m STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB o WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB Q. WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement (Phase10) c498 E7JA E STR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA 4- 0 STR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB > 0 L STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA 0- 0. Q STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB 0 c N STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB o STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC ao 0 STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB E 0 STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA Z 0 STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA d STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA N STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC >+ STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD r a0i STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA LL STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB r c STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA R STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA Q STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 179 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Fundinq Project Title Number Number STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 180 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAC� 048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program Pedestrian Task Force 1111011 STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project qV STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 2 Annual Storm 6 Q+ LReplacemmmoject SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Phase nnual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) Civic Center Playfield (Design) GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR ElDA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Project STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System Bikelink Projec STR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizatio STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STM E6FD Stormwater Comp Plan Update SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 181 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) c494L 2019 Waterline Replacement PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Desi PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) i028 220th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM m Improvements STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Updat PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install 2019 Downtown Parking Study STR HAD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i036 2019 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program alnut St. STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design FAC c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 182 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STIR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design) PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 183 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SW R ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 184 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 HAD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 185 6.5.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02O EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA Revised 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 186 6.5.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 973 (07/16/2020 to 07/31/2020) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pav Correction 0.00 -71.28 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 484.50 16,964.32 122 VACATION VACATION 1,685.84 66,871.88 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 81.00 2,986.00 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 34.25 1,205.51 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 159.00 6,420.14 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 55.00 2,132.03 130 COMP HOURS Holidav Compensation Used 5.41 203.40 150 REGULAR HOURS Kellv Dav Used 108.00 4,322.48 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 108.64 5,649.33 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 7.00 379.42 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 600.00 9,333.31 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 300.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICP 0.00 3,496.07 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 18,389.00 696,311.51 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 5,126.84 194 SICK Emerciencv Sick Leave 204.00 7,979.11 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 87.00 3,623.03 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 23.00 827.78 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 66.00 3,618.26 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 16.00 1,479.87 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 170.75 11,741.92 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 6.25 458.93 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 1,218.99 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 288.38 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,073.12 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 2,756.63 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 71.50 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 118.00 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 0.50 0.00 901 SICK ACCRUED SICK LEAVE 10.46 0.00 903 MISCELLANEOUS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 0.00 -75.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 64.25 08/13/2020 Packet Pg. 187 6.5.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 973 (07/16/2020 to 07/31/2020) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount acp MISCELLANEOUS Accreditation 1 % Part Time 0.00 9.85 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 174.00 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 94.50 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 85.37 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 173.90 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 487.04 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 1.00 deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOI 0.00 86.96 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 119.12 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 998.16 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 518.14 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 914.74 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 5,952.60 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 423.89 fmla ABSENT FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 13.00 0.00 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 238.24 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 83.19 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 935.91 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 148.17 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 768.02 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 5,447.59 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,548.04 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 1,219.98 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 381.68 Iq4 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 421.00 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 732.57 Ig6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 324.39 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 305.69 Ig9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 193.99 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 pfmc COMP HOURS Paid Familv Medical -Comp Used 0.01 0.24 pfml ABSENT Paid Familv Medical Leave 67.32 0.00 pfmp ABSENT Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup 56.80 0.00 08/13/2020 Packet Pg. 188 6.5.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 973 (07/16/2020 to 07/31/2020) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount pfms SICK Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 39.13 1,111.44 pfmv VACATION Paid Family Medical Vacation 8.74 242.02 pfnp ABSENT PAID FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PA 89.00 0.00 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,351.64 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS 0.00 188.98 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 295.58 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 188.98 slw SICK SICK LEAVE ADD BACK 97.52 0.00 St REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pav 0.00 136.97 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 506.62 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 119.12 22,866.62 $884,717.33 Total Net Pay: $602,511.76 08/13/2020 I Packet Pg. 189 6.5.g Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,028 (08/05/2020 to 08/05/2020) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 12.00 664.05 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 1,332.36 12.00 $1,996.41 Total Net Pay: $1,649.71 0 a a� 0 L =a y Y V a� r m c a� c �a 0 L CQ C V 0 O L Q Q Q 0 N LO O co O i fC E E 3 N 0 L Q i E v R Q 08/13/2020 Packet Pg. 190 6.5.h Hour Type .w Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,027 (07/31/2020 to 07/31/2020) Hour Class Description RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY Hours Amount 0.00 148,746.20 0.00 $148,746.20 Total Net Pay: $115,548.42 08/13/2020 Packet Pg. 191 6.5.i Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 973 - 07/16/2020 to 07/31/2020 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 64366 08/05/2020 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 46.00 0.00 64367 08/05/2020 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 619.70 0.00 64368 08/05/2020 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,674.15 0.00 64369 08/05/2020 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 5,227.83 0.00 64370 08/05/2020 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 2,473.91 0.00 11,041.59 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 3071 08/05/2020 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 341,618.57 0.00 3073 08/05/2020 aflac AFLAC 5,636.82 0.00 3078 08/05/2020 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 31,740.17 0.00 3079 08/05/2020 us US BANK 119,103.63 0.00 3080 08/05/2020 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 124,333.01 0.00 3081 08/05/2020 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,990.44 0.00 3084 08/05/2020 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 1,152.00 0.00 0.00 629,574.64 Grand Totals: 640,616.23 0.00 8/13/2020 Packet Pg. 192 6.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Osborn Consulting, Inc. for the Phase 2 & 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On August 11, 2020, staff presented this item to Committee of the Whole and it was placed on the August 18th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement. Narrative A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was issued in December 2019 to hire a consultant to provide design engineering services for the Phase 2 and 3 Storm Maintenance Projects. The City received statements of qualifications from four engineering firms and the selection committee selected Osborn Consulting, Inc. to provide design engineering services for the Phase 2 and 3 Storm drain Maintenance Projects. As a woman -owned company, Osborn Consulting, Inc. is certified as a woman business enterprise (WBE) and disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) by the Washington State Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprise. The scope of work under this Phase 2 contract includes data gathering and preliminary evaluation for 5 sites as shown in Exhibit 2. From there, 2 or 3 sites will be selected for construction in 2021. The current proposed scope is set to complete final design on three sites and includes necessary tasks for development of bid documents and preliminary construction support in 2021. The remaining sites will become Phase 3 and will be pushed forward for construction in 2022 and will require an additional supplement to the scope and fee at a future date, prior to proceeding with final design of Phase 3 elements. Due to restrictions as a result of COVID-19, staff initiated a small contract to begin with data collection and preliminary evaluation in order to maintain the proposed schedule and avoid a one-year gap in construction of storm maintenance projects. Staff now presents Supplement #1 to that contract, which includes a much more thorough scope of work needed to develop full project plans and specification for bidding and construction. The value of this particular contract runs slightly higher than average due to the fact that the contract partially prepares for 2-years worth of project design and any data gathered during this phase will support Phase 3 if not used during Phase 2. Attachments: Packet Pg. 193 s.s Exhibit 1 - Osborn Consulting Supplement Exhibit 2 - Site Evaluation Packet Pg. 194 6.6.a CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON 121 ST" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Phase 2 & 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Osborn Consulting, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as Phase 2 & 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project, dated May 19, 2020; and WHEREAS, the original Scope of Work has been expanded with regard to providing additional engineering design services, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of May 19, 2020 between the parties, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $97,795 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $413,291 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $511,086 ($97,795 plus $413,291). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this addendum, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Packet Pg. 195 6.6.a 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in Supplemental Agreement No. I but only as set forth herein. DONE this day of CITY OF EDMONDS Bv: Michael Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 20 OSBORN CONSULTING, INC. By: _ Title: u \\edmsvr-deptfs\Engineering\Stafl\Megan\Engineering Admin\PROJECTST017B.Ph 2 Storm Replacement 21-22\Osbom.Supp l.doc Packet Pg. 196 6.6.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: a `o c d E as a a Cn 0 N u \\edmsvr-deptfs\Engineering\Stafl\Megan\Engineering Admin\PROJECTST017B.Ph 2 Storm Replacement 21-22\Osbom.Supp l.doc Packet Pg. 197 6.6.a EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Amendment #1 Project: Phase 2 & 3 (2021— 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project PRIME Consultant: Osborn Consulting, Inc. Contract No.: EOFB Background The City of Edmonds Storm Utility system has numerous locations where existing pipes are showing deterioration and in need of repair and replacement. Through the process of video inspecting of their storm pipe system, City the has developed an inventory of deficient pipelines and appurtenances at various locations within the City that will need to be replaced due to increased conveyance needs, material, pipe age, and maintenance. In response to the inventory, the City has selected a number of pipeline replacement projects that will need to be completed in the coming years. Osborn Consulting, Inc, Consultant, has been selected for the Phase 2 & 3 (2021-22) storm utility replacement projects to design improvements for up to five sites selected by the City. This will include providing site surveys, preparing cost estimates, engineered plans, specifications and bid documents and construction support. Preliminary design with data collection, site surveys, and project planning with hydrologic modeling has been completed through the first contract This scope of work continues the design effort with 30% design through bid documents on up to three sites. The remaining sites will be completed through bid documents in 2021 through a third contract. The five selected sites identified by the City by email on March 2, 20202 are: • Site A — 88`h Ave W @ 194' St SW, approximate pipe length 450 LF • Site B — Pine St @ Edmonds Way, approximate pipe length 1,800 LF • Site C — 80t1i Ave W @ 184' St SW, approximate pipe length 1,200 LF • Site D — Meadowdale Beach Rd @ 6900, approximate pipe length 280 LF • Site E — Maple Street @ Dayton to 7t' Ave S, approximate pipe length 800 LF The scope of work includes the following elements: Task I —Project Management Monitoring and communicating the status of the scope, schedule, and budget of this work assignment and providing monthly reporting to the City. Consultant Services • Prepare the Project Management Plan o Develop and manage Project Schedule with key milestones and tasks o Identify communication protocols and issue/action tracking o Project -specific Quantity Control Plan • Prepare status reports describing the following: o Services completed during the month. o Outstanding issues (if any). o Scope/schedule/budget status. o A financial summary. • Attend one project kickoff meeting with City of Edmonds staff. • Attend one project closure meeting with City of Edmonds staff. a L c d E m a a Cn L 0 N u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 198 6.6.a • Attend design review meetings after receiving submittal comments. • Bi-weekly PM Check -ins via web/phone • Manage Issue Log for City and all team members. • Manage Risk Register to identify and document project risks and mitigation strategies. City of Edmonds's Responsibilities Attend project kickoff and closure meetings (in person or via teleconference). Review and approve invoices. Review and comment on submittals within the schedule. Assumptions • Project duration will be approximately 13 months (August 2020 through September 2021). • There will be one project closure meeting attended by up to two (2) Consultant Team members and City staff. Closure meeting to be held at Edmonds City Hall. • There will be three design review meetings attended by up to two (2) Consultant Team members and City staff. Review meetings will be held for review of Preliminary Design, Phase 2 60% Design, and Phase 2 90% Design. Design review meetings to be held at Edmonds City Hall. Deliverables • Project kickoff meeting and closure meeting, with meeting minutes. • Project Management Plan. • Project schedule, update to be provided with monthly status reports. • Issue Log and Risk Register to be provided at each deliverable. • Bi-weekly check -in (as necessary and determined by City Project Manager prior to each week) • Monthly status reports. Task 2 — Data Collection & Review The Consultant will review available existing site data, provide site survey, geotechnical investigations, coordination of utilities and utility pothole locates. Task 2.1 Data Review and Utility Coordination Task completed under previous contract scope. Task 2.2 Topographic Survey Task completed under previous contract scope. Task 2.3 Geotechnical Investigations The Consultant will coordinate and provide geotechnical investigations for the project. Geotechnical review and investigations will be provided at four of the five sites. Geotechnical investigations for Sites B, C, D and E will be provided following the City of Edmonds Public Works Department Engineering Division Policy, Geotechnical Engineering Requirements for Utility Project Design, dated November 3, u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Pagc 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 199 6.6.a 2014. Infiltration testing will be conducted at Site B and D to confirm field parameters for the proposed water quality facilities in accordance with Appendix B of the 2017 Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. After the completion of the investigations and testing, the geotechnical engineer will prepare a geotechnical report summarizing site soil conditions including infiltration feasibility and estimated ground water elevations if encountered, and presenting geotechnical recommendations for construction of the proposed improvements. Drilling Initial geotechnical exploration proposed for the project will consist of six borings: two at Site B due to the length of the proposed storm pipe replacement, one at each end of the planned Site C storm pipe replacement, and one each at Site D and Site E. The borings will each be drilled to a nominal depth of 20 feet below the ground surface. The borings will be drilled in the right-of-way as close to the proposed improvement locations as possible. The drilling will be accomplished using a hollow -stem auger drill rig. The exploration borings will be performed under the full-time observation of an engineer or geologist who shall maintain detailed records of the conditions encountered in the borings and obtain representative samples for additional laboratory testing and classification. Infiltration Tests Water quality facilities with potential infiltration are under consideration for Sites B and D. The regional geology map indicates that Site B is in an area of Whidbey Formation and Site D is in an area of Vashon advance outwash. Both of these geologic units are "glacially consolidated" and would require infiltration testing per the 2017 City of Edmonds Stormwater Addendum to estimate design infiltration rates. Infiltration feasibility be assessed after the geotechnical drilling phase of work, and that small-scale pilot infiltration testing be conducted if infiltration appears feasible. Small-scale pilot infiltration tests will be completed at Sites B and D using the procedure described in the 2017 City of Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. These infiltration tests require a minimum base area of 12 square feet, will be completed within the areas of the proposed infiltration systems, and we anticipate one test at each location. The duration of each test will be approximately 7 hours, and include a 6-hour soaking period followed by a 1-hour test period, after steady-state constant head conditions are achieved. Following the test period, the discharge will be discontinued, and the level in the pit will be monitored at timed intervals to determine the falling head rate. This rate will be compared with the constant head rate to assist in determining a suitable design infiltration rate. Upon completion of each infiltration test, the infiltration test pit will be over excavated to: (1) document the types of soils the water infiltrated through, and (2) identify any soil layers that will restrict the downward flow of infiltrating water. The volume of water required for this test may be in the range of several thousands of gallons. A water truck, if needed, will be used to complete the infiltration testing at Sites B and D. Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing, including grain -size analysis and moisture content of selected samples from each boring, will be completed. Supplemental laboratory testing, including grain -size distribution, organic content, or cation exchange capacity (CEC) of samples of the infiltration receptor soils, may be required depending on project design requirements. Prior to our exploration, the Consultant will notify the one -call utility service to locate buried public underground utilities at the site. The City of Edmonds will confirm that these locations are clear for drilling based on available information. If underground utility conflicts or other obstructions/right-of-way issues prevent drilling in these locations, notification will be provided of these conflicts, options for u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 200 6.6.a alternative drilling locations, and changes to the estimated cost, if any. The Consultant will not be responsible for damage to buried utilities that are not accurately marked on the ground prior to our work or shown on as -built plans that are provided to us. Each boring will be backfilled with bentonite and, where paved, capped with concrete or asphalt, suitable for support of vehicle use. In preparing our cost estimate, any soil cuttings generated during drilling will be hauled offsite by the driller. Each infiltration test pit will be backfilled with the excavated material and bucket tamped in place. No other site restoration is included in our cost estimate. Because the roadway segments along which the work will occur are limited to two lanes with narrow shoulder widths, we anticipate that closure of a portion or all of one lane adjacent to each boring location will be needed for drilling access. We anticipate that the lane closure will be limited to a short section of road adjacent to the boring being drilled or infiltration test being excavated; traffic control will be provided by the Consultant; and the section of lane closure will be moved for each boring. Due to the distribution of the project sites across the city, we anticipate the duration of the field exploration to be 5 days (i.e., 3 days for drilling and 2 days for infiltration testing). Assumptions: • Additional geotechnical investigations will not be required at Site A. a • The borings will be drilled in the right-of-way as close to the proposed work as practical. L • One boring is anticipated for each site based on the City's 1000 ft spacing policy. • Two infiltration tests are anticipated, one for Site B and one for Site D. • Closure of a portion or all of one lane adjacent to each boring location will be needed for drilling a access vn • Traffic control will be provided by the Consultant o` • Anticipated duration of the field exploration to be 3 days for drilling and 2 days for infiltration. • The geotechnical investigations for the four sites will be completed consecutively with results compiled into a single report. • Budget for utility locations requiring vacuum truck pre -excavation are not included and will be an m additional cost if required by the City of Edmonds or utility company. a Deliverables: • Traffic control plan for each site (PDF). • Geotechnical Report, Draft and Final (PDF). Task 3 — Project Planning and Preliminary Design Additional effort will include water quality sizing and 30% design plans developed for each of the five sites with cost estimates and design summary memorandum. This task will: • Alternatives analysis will include up to two water quality options for Sites B and D to confirm the location for field infiltration testing. • Create 30% Design -level plans for each site based on site survey. • Prepare planning -level cost estimates for each option. City of Edmonds's Responsibilities • City will provide input and review comments within the agreed upon schedule. City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Pagc 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 201 6.6.a Assumptions: • Consultant will use internal CAD standards and title blocks, incorporating the City's logo and available design and performance guidelines available through the City's website. • The stormwater design and modeling shall be in accordance with the 2017 City of Edmonds Stormwater Addendum which adopts Ecology's Western Washington Hydrologic Model. • Basin delineations and conveyance sizing was completed under the previous contract scope. • A hydraulic modeling of backwater analysis will not be required. • Budget assumes up to fourteen plan sheets for the five sites. No profiles or project details will be provided with the 30% Design. • Design summary with water quality options for Sites B and D will be summarized in a single memorandum. • Geotechnical investigations and final water quality design will be completed after 30% Design with confirmation of design approach. Deliverables: • One (1) Design Memorandum including hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for each site, Draft, Final (PDF). • 30% Plans (PDF format) • Planning -level cost estimates for each option. Task 4 Perm ittin Consultant will compile a summary of anticipated permits required for each of the 5 project sites based on the 30% Design improvements, assist the City with permit applications and support City staff with information necessary for completing a SEPA checklist. City of Edmonds's Responsibilities • City will provide confirmation of stream boundaries for potential environmental impacts. • City staff will complete the SEPA Checklist Assumptions: • One (1) Summary Memorandum identifying the anticipated permitting effort and timeline for all five sites. • Local permits will be completed and submitted by the City. • A JARPA permit will not be required for any site. • Up to 24 staff hours are included for permit support. Deliverables: • Permit Summary Memorandum, Draft, Final (PDF). Task 5 — Phase 2 Construction Documents With City review and approval of a preferred design option through Task 3, the Consultant will use the preferred option to advance two or three of the five sites for construction in 2021 as part of the Phase 2 u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Pagc 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 202 6.6.a construction documents. The remaining sites will be included in the Phase 3 construction documents. Plan, Specification and Cost Estimate (PS&E) will be submitted at the 60%, 90% and Final (Bid Ready) stages. The cost estimate will identify bid items that will require special provisions. Constructability and Quality Management review will be completed at each stage prior to submittal. City of Edmonds's Responsibilities • Provide the City's current Division 0 and 1 template in Word -format for the Consultant to incorporate into the project documents. • Provide the current City of Edmonds Special Provisions Division 2 through 9 in Word -format for the Consultant to edit. • City will provide input and review comments on the design submittals within the agreed upon schedule. • The City will provide a consolidated list or redline set of review comments within the timeframe shown on the project schedule. • Bid advertisement, coordination and award will be handled by the City. Assumptions: • Phase 2 budget is based on developing construction documents for up to three sites including up to 32 plan sheets. . • Sites will be combined into a single construction bid set. • Standard details will be included on the detail sheets. • Specifications for the City's current Division 0 and 1 will be provided by the City with 90% and Final submittals. • Special Provisions Division 2 through 9 will be developed using the City's standard specifications. • Edits to the City's Special Provisions will be based on WSDOT Standard Specifications, 2020 Edition. • There will only be minor changes to the project design after the 90% submittal. • Utility conflict can be resolved at the point of conflict with simple adjustment of the utilities or storm drainage locations. Relocating utilities is not included. • Surface restoration will match existing conditions, additional roadway or pedestrian improvements or are not included. • Contractor will develop traffic control plans through specifications. Design sheets for traffic control are not anticipated construction plan sheets. • Project will be advertised as a single bid package. • A single Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Report will be submitted for Phase 2 documenting the stormwater minimum requirements for all stormwater improvement sites. • A draft Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) based simplified checklist form will be submitted for each site with the 90% submittal with comments address with the Final Bid -Ready submittal. Deliverables: 60% PS&E (PDF, Word file for specifications) 90% PS&E (PDF, Word file for specifications) • Final Bid -Ready Submittal PS&E (CAD files and 1 PDF copy). a L c d E m a a Cn L 0 N u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Pagc 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 203 6.6.a • Stormwater Site Plan Report, Draft (60%) and Final (90%) (PDF) • Draft SWPPP, Draft (90%) and Final (Bid) (PDF) Task 6 — Phase 2 Bid and Construction Support (2021) When requested by the City, the consultant will provide limited engineering services during bid and construction support for Phase 2. These services are expected to be: • Prepare and issue addenda to clarify the construction documents, if necessary. • Attend one pre -construction meeting. • Review of contractor submittals. • Response to contractors RFI's. • Site visit to review unforeseen conditions. • AutoCAD Record drawings based on contractor's field plans. a City of Edmonds's Responsibilities `o • City will provide initial review of all contractor requests. • The City will provide on -site inspection and will lead the administrating and managing of m construction documents and communications with the contractor. Q- a • A single copy of construction markups drawings will be provided for production of record '� v drawings. c o` N Assumptions: 0 • One consultant will attend the pre -construction meeting. • Respond to a maximum of 2 addenda clarifications during bidding. • Respond to a maximum of 3 submittal reviews on specialty products. • Respond to a maximum of 2 RFI's per site. • Consultant will visit a maximum of 2 sites to review unforeseen conditions. • No geotechnical support would be required. • Review responses will be provided with 7-day of written request. • Additional survey or field confirmation will not be required for Record Drawing preparation. Deliverables: • Submittal review comments (PDF). • Reponses to RFI's (PDF). • Findings from site visit (PDF). • Record Drawings, Draft, Final (PDF and AutoCAD) Task 7 — Management Reserve — Contingency Fund To provide additional services which may be required to complete these projects, and which are requested and authorized by the City. The consultant will provide the City with a scope and budget for the additional services which the City will review prior to the consultant beginning work. The City shall provide Consultant with written authorization to proceed with any additional services. City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 204 6.6.a Tasks 7.1 Management Reserve Work may include, but is not limited to: addressing additional permit coordination efforts, unforeseen design changes and/or additional support during bidding or construction. The fee estimated is approximately 10% of the total fee for Tasks 1 through 6 of the initial contract and this amendment. Tasks 7.2 Field Reserve Work may include, but is not limited to: addressing additional survey, potholing, geotechnical investigations or other support services required for the design of the Phase 2 or Phase 3.The fee estimated is approximately 10% of the total fee for Tasks 1 through 6 of the initial contract and this amendment. General Assumptions • All coordination with property owners will be handled by the City. • Flow control and water quality treatment will not be required for the stormwater improvements sites. Water quality treatment, if feasible, will be provided through optional retrofit design for Site B and D. • On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs will not be required for stormwater improvement sites. • The proposed improvements will be located within the City right-of-way or within existing City easements, except at Site C. • Any existing encroachments in the right-of-way will be resolved by the City. • Writing of legal descriptions and legal exhibits for additional easements will only be required for Site C. • Water quality treatment design will be completed for Sites B and D with completion of the geotechnical investigations and documented in the Stormwater Site Plan Report. • The proposed improvements will not require stream or wetland field investigations or critical area analysis. • Cultural Resource documentation will not be required. • Funding will be provided by the City; additional grant support will not be required. • Support for public outreach will not be required. a `o c d E m a a Cn 0 N u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Pagc 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 205 6.6.a • The proposed improvements will not require stream or wetland field investigations or critical area analysis. • Cultural Resource documentation will not be required. • Funding will be provided by the City; additional grant support will not be required. • Support for public outreach will not be required. • Need for structural engineer is not included. u City of Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 (2021 — 2022) Storm Utility Replacement Project -Amendment #1 Page 9 of 9 Packet Pg. 206 Osborn Consulting, Inc. - City of Edmonds Phase 2 and 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Amendment No. 1 6.6.a EXHIBI Firm OCI Surveying Subconsultant Geotechnical Subconsultant Cost Estimate Classification Hourly Rate - 2020 Hourly Rate - 2021 Project Tasks Project PM/ Project Design Land. CADD PIC Sr. PE Engineer Engineer Arch. Mgr CADD Admin $210.00 $187.00 $142.00 $115.00 $150.00 $145.00 $111.00 $105.00 Expense Sub Mark - up 10.0% Cost Estimate $217.00 $193.00 $147.00 $119.00 $155.00 $150.00 $115.00 $109.00 Hours Estimate Task 1: Project Management —7 i Total Hours 14 54 22 1 0 0 0 0 28 $ 290 $ $ 19,392 $ $ - $19,392 Task 2: Data Collection & Review Total Hours 5 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 $ 260 $ 3,400 $ 12,710 $ - $ 34,000 $46,710 Task 3: Project Planning & Preliminary Design Total Hours 20 78 158 240 0 12 84 4 $ - $ - $ 80,306 $ - $ - $80,306 Task 4: Permit Support Total Hours 2 8 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 $ $ 1 $ 4,036 T $ - $ - $4,036 Task 5: Phase 2 Construction Documents I T Total Hours 80 1 134 1 302 1 402 1 0 42 250 0 $ - $ $ 164,812 $ - $ - $164,812 Task 6: Phase 2 Construction Support (2021) Total Hours 8 1 26 1 48 1 0 1 0 6 28 0 $ 105 $ $ 18,035 $ - $ - $18,035 Task 7. Management Reserve - Contingency Fund Total Hours 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 $ 80,000 $ $ 80,000 $ $ - $80,000 Firm Subtotal: of total budget: $379,291 92% $0 0% $34,000 8% $413,291 9 Printed: 7/27/2020 Edmonds Phase 2-3 Storm_FeeEstimate_20200727 Osborn Consulting, Inc. Packet Pg. 207 EXHIBIT C 6.6.a Edmonds Phase 2 & 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Rates (Effective Jan 1, 2020 - December 31, 2021) Negotiated Hourly Rates - Fully Burdened Classification 2020 Hourly Rate 2021 Hourly Rate Principa I / Sr. Technical Advisor $ 210.00 $ 217.00 Project Manager $ 187.00 $ 193.00 Senior Landscape Architect $ 195.00 $ 201.00 CADD Manager $ 145.00 $ 150.00 Senior Engineer $ 164.00 $ 169.00 Project Landscape Architect $ 150.00 $ 155.00 Project Engineer $ 142.00 $ 147.00 Landscape and Urban Designer $ 125.00 $ 129.00 Design Engineer $ 115.00 $ 119.00 Landscape Architect $ 104.00 $ 108.00 Landscape Designer $ 83.00 $ 86.00 CADD $ 111.00 $ 115.00 Graphic Designer $ 118.00 $ 122.00 Administrative $ 105.00 $ 109.00 Accounting / Project Controls $ 135.00 $ 140.00 O Packet Pg. 208 t City of Edmonds SD Site A 7-6 0 47.02 94.0 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION I 6.6.b I V F;imnnil . d .O L i .fie .... ftrirrtl.rk Legend c Storm Catch Basins ❑ Edmonds E ❑ Private L O ■ Infiltration Cl) N Storm Manholes p Edmonds d o Private L �O � Infiltration a+ � d A Detention Facilities E N Culvert 0. Q <all other values> • Yes L o Facility Feature 0 Creeks N O Storm Line O — <all other values> O No, BNSF; No, COUNTY; No, LY MOUNTLAKE TERRACE; No, PC — SHORELINE; No, STATE; No, W ; — Yes, EDMONDS; Yes, PRIVATE; LU N Facility Lines Storm Ditch ' N ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLIN' — <all other values> x Lu 2 s; 4 at E t Notes Site survey and geo-tecf a report already complete( (this site only) Packet Pg. 209 1 I 6.6.b I City of Edmonds SD Site 6 ,.e WGS_1984_Web _Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere © City of Edmonds This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Legend Storm Catch Basins ❑ Edmonds ❑ Private ■ Infiltration Storm Manholes O Edmonds O Private Infiltration • Detention Facilities Culvert <all other values> • Yes o Facility Feature Creeks Storm Line — <all other values> No, BNSF; No, COUNTY; No, LY MOUNTLAKE TERRACE; No, PC SHORELINE; No, STATE; No, W — Yes, EDMONDS; Yes, PRIVATE; Facility Lines N Storm Ditch O ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN r_ <all other values> 2 fC 1 3 R 2 > W 5; 4 N 9;71;7;8 fn N t x LU 1:2,257 N otes a Packet Pg. 210 1 6.6.b City of Edmonds SD Site C ,'6 WGS_1984_Web _Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere © City of Edmonds This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ■ Legend Storm Catch Basins ❑ Edmonds ❑ Private ■ Infiltration Storm Manholes p Edmonds O Private Infiltration • Detention Facilities Culvert <all other values> • Yes Facility Feature Creeks Storm Line — <all other values> No, BNSF; No, COUNTY; No, LY MOUNTLAKE TERRACE; No, PC SHORELINE; No, STATE; No, W — Yes, EDMONDS; Yes, PRIVATE; Facility Lines N Storm Ditch O ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN r_ <all other values> 2 fC 1 3 R 2 > W 5; 4 N 9;71;7;8 fn N t x LU 1: 1,128 Notes c as E r a Packet Pg. 211 1 6.6.b pity ,7+a Dress/clean/enhance ditch as feasible a f of Edmonds SD Site D P Replace 12" storm; assumed - to shift to north side of road to avoid existing utilities New CB to pickup portion of north side drainage as needed ". 9-114L.-O '• A � FIR Rr. Y h ��1``yyi 0. -�' 1AWA • I 7 f _ _ ,:1• r�w r New surface bio-retention; ° {- collect overflow to DW New surface bio-retention; -' culvert; cut and abandon r collect overflow to mainline r storm upstream to next CB ':: 1: 1,128 3 0 47.02 94.0 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accura WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliat © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIC V d a t �s¢erave 'y'joi mlaN """• �ierrace V Legend c Storm Catch Basins ❑ Edmonds 0 ❑ Private O ■ Infiltration (n N Storm Manholes t p Edmonds f1 O Private L �O Infiltration a� A Detention Facilities E a� Culvert Q <all other values> • Yes L o Facility Feature 0 Creeks y O Storm Line r- - <all other values> O No, BNSF; No, COUNTY; No, LY 7 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE; No, PC SHORELINE; No, STATE; No, W ; — Yes, EDMONDS; Yes, PRIVATE; LU a) Facility Lines Storm Ditch ' N AsBuilt IT <all other values> � l PROPERTY, SEWER W C PROPERTY, STORM PROPERTY, WATER L Notes M Q Packet Pg. 212 I 6.6.b I " City of Edmonds SD Site E 'LAP 0 94.04 188.1 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION l� V �4 L � � • • r+�IDunilek 4 � Legend c Storm Catch Basins ❑ Edmonds E ❑ Private L O ■ Infiltration Cl) N Storm Manholes t p Edmonds d O Private L. �O � Infiltration a+ � d • Detention Facilities E N Culvert 0- EL <all other values> • Yes L o Facility Feature 0 = Creeks N O Storm Line O — <all other values> O No, BNSF; No, COUNTY; No, LY MOUNTLAKE TERRACE; No, PC — SHORELINE; No, STATE; No, W ; — Yes, EDMONDS; Yes, PRIVATE; LU N Facility Lines — Storm Ditch ' N ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLIN' — <all other values> x Lu z s; 4 at E t Notes Q Packet Pg. 213 1 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Report Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.40.055 requires reports to the City Council during the first and third quarter of each year. ECDC 23.40.055 provides that: The director will provide a report to the city council during the first and third quarter each year, summarizing critical area decisions that have been made since the previous report. The report will include information such as the number and type of critical area decisions that have been made, including information on buffers and enhancements approved for each applicable decision, a description of each approved restoration project, and other information specifically requested by the council following the previous report. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Critical Area Determinations A critical area determination is required for all properties that have a development proposal that will include some ground disturbance and where there has not been a critical area determination within the last five years. Property owners fill out the Critical Area Checklist form with basic information on the property and then staff does a preliminary review of available site information, including checking the critical area GIS layers, and then conducts a site visit. The result of this review is either a "Waiver" which means it was determined that there were no critical areas on or adjacent to the site or a "Study Required" which indicates that there appears to be critical areas on or adjacent to the site. Since the January 1, 2020, there have been 103 applications for critical area determinations. Sixty (60) determinations were "Waiver" and 35 determinations were "Study Required," with an additional nine applications still awaiting a determination. Exhibit 1 contains a spread sheet with the critical area permit number, site address, and critical determination for each of the critical area determinations since January 1, 2020. Subsequent Determinations: A new requirement with the 2016 critical area ordinance update is that a new critical area determination is required for properties whose previous critical area determination is more than five years old. Prior to the 2016 update, staff had been telling property owners that they Packet Pg. 214 7.1 would only need to have the critical area determination done once on their property; so a few property owners have been surprised when they were informed of the need for a subsequent determination. The fee for a subsequent critical area determination was set at $55 which is half of the fee for a first time determination. Thirty-eight of the 103 critical area determinations since January 2020 were subsequent (i.e. not the first) critical area determinations. Five of the 38 subsequent critical area determinations resulted in a change from "Waiver" to "Study Required;" these were the result of a determination of the presence of potential erosion hazards or landslide hazards. Prior to the 2005 critical area ordinance update, erosion hazards and landslide hazard areas were determined differently than they are under more recent versions of the CAO. As a result, it is the pre-2005 critical area determinations that so far have resulted in determination changes. Two determinations changed from "Study Required" to "Waiver" as a result of a subdivision creating a new parcel that was not in a critical area or critical area buffer. One determination changed from a "Study Required" to a "Waiver." The previous determination identified a culvert stream but there does not appear to be a culvert and the nearest stream is more the 140 feet away, beyond the widest stream buffer and setback. Develoament Review Matrix Critical Area Review: If a critical area "Study Required" determination is issued for a property (see the Critical Area Determinations section above), when a development application is submitted for that property, the Planning Division reviews the development proposal for consistency with the City's critical area regulations. Previous critical area reports have included a development review matrix for projects that required a critical area review. The City switched to a new permitting system in 2020 and I have not been able to develop a report yet that identifies which projects were on properties that required a critical area review. I hope to have the necessary reporting developed by the next critical area report. Interrupted Buffer. Buffer Averaaina. Buffer Width Reduction. or Enhancement Proiect There has been one development proposal that included an interrupted buffer determination this year (Exhibit 2). No projects have included buffer averaging, buffer width reduction, or enhancement projects since the last critical area report. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Critical Area Determinations since January 1, 2020 Exhibit 2: 1055 7th Ave South Interupted Buffer Determination Packet Pg. 215 7.1.a Critical Area Determinations since January 1, 2020 Permit ID Project Subtype STATUS Address Type of Critical Area Identified Flooded Areas Erosion Landslide Fish & Wildlife (PHS) Stream Wetland Change from Initial Determination CRA2020-0001 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 7103 156TH ST SW X X X No CRA2020-0002 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9210 190TH ST SW X X CRA2020-0003 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9809 241ST PL SW X CRA2020-0004 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8016 238TH ST SW CRA2020-0005 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 20207 84TH PL W CRA2020-0006 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 21328 82ND PL W CRA2020-0008 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 7831 185TH PL SW No CRA2020-0009 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1046 WALNUT ST No CRA2020-0010 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 6811 157TH PL SW X CRA2020-0011 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 21612 80TH AVE W No CRA2020-0012 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1257 8TH AVE S CRA2020-0013 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8805 220TH ST SW No CRA2020-0014 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 302 6TH AVE S No CRA2020-0015 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8427 202ND ST SW CRA2020-0016 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 6805 157TH PL SW X X X CRA2020-0017 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 6910 160TH ST SW X X CRA2020-0018 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 4116TH AVE S CRA2020-0019 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 2352175TH AVE W Yes - Property subdivided no CA on this portion CRA2020-0020 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 2352175TH AVE W X X No CRA2020-0021 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8729 236TH ST SW CRA2020-0022 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 15712 71ST AVE W X No CRA2020-0024 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9011 PARK RD X X CRA2020-0025 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8104 219TH ST SW No CRA2020-0026 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 21313 76TH AVENUE WEST X X CRA2020-0027 INTIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9601 EDMONDS WAY X X CRA2020-0028 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 7708 234TH ST SW CRA2020-0029 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 422 OLYMPIC AVE CRA2020-0030 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 1143 6TH AVE S X Yes - CRA1994-0194 Waiver CRA2020-0031 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8507 BOWDOIN WAY 1 CRA2020-0032 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8051 184th ST SW CRA2020-0033 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 523 MAPLE ST 302 CRA2020-0034 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 18828 SOUND VIEW PL CRA2020-0035 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 1055 7TH AVE S X CRA2020-0037 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 22009 76TH AVE W No CRA2020-0038 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 23507 78TH AVE W CRA2020-0039 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 23705 74TH AVE W X CRA2020-0040 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8529 238TH ST SW No CRA2020-0042 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 24305 107TH PL W CRA2020-0043 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 20018 83RD AVE W X CRA2020-0044 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 806 CARY RD Yes - Property subdivided no CA on this portion CRA2020-0046 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8421 202N D ST SW CRA2020-0047 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 7714 196TH ST SW CRA2020-0048 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 20324 87TH AVE W X CRA2020-0049 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 17823 202ND PL SW P Packet Pg. 216 7.1.a Critical Area Determinations since January 1, 2020 Permit ID Project Subtype STATUS Address Type of Critical Area Identified Flooded Areas Erosion Landslide Fish & Wildlife (PHS) Stream Wetland Change from Initial Determination CRA2020-0050 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER WAIVER 1871188th AVE W No CRA2020-0051 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION 7520 RIDGE WAY Yes - CRA2003-0132 Waiver CRA2020-0052 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 736 FIR ST X CRA2020-0053 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 18300 ANDOVER ST CRA2020-0054 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 18018 85TH PL W X CRA2020-0055 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 22603 100TH AVE W X CRA2020-0056 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1414 9TH AVE N 101 CRA2020-0057 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 820 9TH AVE N CRA2020-0058 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 825 MAIN ST No CRA2020-0059 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 24015 96TH PL W CRA2020-0060 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 8711 TALBOT RD X CRA2020-0061 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1212 8TH AVE N No CRA2020-0062 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 21222 82ND PL W CRA2020-0063 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1931183RD PL W CRA2020-0064 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 100410TH AVE N X CRA2020-0065 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 21328 82ND PL W CRA2020-0066 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 640 DAYTON ST CRA2020-0067 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 18909 94TH AVE W X CRA2020-0068 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 23406 HUMBER LN CRA2020-0069 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 23616 99TH PL W X X CRA2020-0070 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 8040 CYRUS PL X X X CRA2020-0071 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 825 9TH AVE N CRA2020-0072 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 7732 201ST ST SW No CRA2020-0073 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 9329 224TH ST SW No CRA2020-0074 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 21223 96TH AVE W No CRA2020-0076 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1012 WALNUT ST No CRA2020-0077 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 841 CEDAR ST X Yes - CRA1996-0104 Waiver CRA2020-0078 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9102 SUNSET WAY X X No CRA2020-0082 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 908 PUGET WAY CRA2020-0091 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8428 216TH ST SW CRA2020-0092 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 11319TH AVE S X CRA2020-0093 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 7216 SOUND VIEW DR CRA2020-0094 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 880 SOMERSET LN CRA2020-0095 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 728 EDMONDS WAY X CRA2020-0096 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1051WALNUT ST CRA2020-0097 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 7824 175TH ST SW X X CRA2020-0098 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 2181195TH AVE W No CRA2020-0100 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 724 9TH AVE N No CRA2020-0101 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 9415 BOWDOIN WAY X CRA2020-0102 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 4113RD AVE N CRA2020-0103 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 24109 92ND AVE W CRA2020-0104 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 8120TALBOT RD X X X CRA2020-0105 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED1 54012TH AVE N X X Yes - CRA1999-0274 Waiver CRA2020-0106 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 123700 EDMONDS WAY X P Packet Pg. 217 7.1.a Critical Area Determinations since January 1, 2020 Permit ID Project Subtype STATUS Address Type of Critical Area Identified Flooded Areas Erosion Landslide Fish & Wildlife (PHS) Stream Wetland Change from Initial Determination CRA2020-0107 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 1022 EUCLID AVE Yes - CRA2001-0109 Stream Parcel is more than 100 feet from stream Waiver determination is appropriate CRA2020-0108 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 24315 91ST AVE W X No CRA2020-0109 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 7115 174TH ST SW Yes - CRA1994-0028 Waiver CRA2007-0039 Erosion/Landslide Based on LiDAR only erosion is appropirate determination CRA2020-0110 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 9116 185TH PL SW CRA2020-0111 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 8721 192ND ST SW CRA2020-0112 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION WAIVER 24014 74TH AVE W CRA2020-0113 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED 839 CARY RD X Yes - CRA1993-0061 Waiver CRA2020-0115 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 6820 174TH ST SW CRA2020-0116 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 206 8TH AVE N CRA2020-0117 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 5243RDAVE N CRA2020-0118 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 630 ALDER ST CRA2020-0119 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 7725 168TH ST SW CRA2020-0121 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 7724 195TH ST SW CRA2020-0122 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 16515 74TH PL W CRA2020-0123 UPDATED CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 18223 84TH PL W CRA2020-0124 INITIAL CA DETERMINATION APPLIED 224SKYLINE DR CRA2020-0023 CRITICAL AREA HAZARD TREE APPROVED 821 SPRAGUE ST CRA2020-0099 CRITICAL AREA HAZARD TREE COMPLETED 925 HINDLEY LN CRA2020-0114 CRITICAL AREA HAZARD TREE APPROVED 305 CASPERS ST P Packet Pg. 218 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING WETLAND & STREAM DETERMINATION AND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR 1055 77'H A VENUE So UTH EDMONDS, WA Wetland Resources, Inc. Project #20060 Prepared B� Wetland Resources, Inc. 9505 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106 Everett, WA 98208 (425) 337-3174 Prepared For Select Homes, LLC Attn: Kayla Nichols 16531 13,h Ave W, #A107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 April 15, 2020 Packet Pg. 219 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK .r Q Packet Pg. 220 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA................................................................................ 2 4.0 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION............................................................................ 3 i 4.1 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION METHODOLOGY 3 ° 4.1.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria . . ............................................................................................ 3 4.1.2 Soils Criteria........................................................................................................................... 3 w 4.1.3 Hydrology Criteria................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 WETLAND AND STREAM BOUNDARY DETERMINATION FINDINGS 4 4.2.1 Shellabar er Creek 4 g N 5.0 WILDLIFE............................................................................................................................. 7 L 6.0 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS......................................................................................................... 7 Q 7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION................................................................................................ 9 L V 8.0 USE OF THIS REPORT........................................................................................................... 9 c 9.0 REFERENCES 10 C LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 -AERIAL VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (NOT TO SCALE) ................................................ 1 FIGURE 2-SHELLABARGER CREEK AND PIPED STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. P1-P3 INDICATE THE LOCATIONS OF PHOTOS PICTURED IN FIGURE 3. (IMAGE SOURCE: CITY OF EDMONDS GIS INTERACTIVE ONLINE MAP) ..................................... 5 FIGURE 3 -PHOTOGRAPHS OF SHELLABARGER CREEK IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE. CLOCKWISE FROM THE TOP LEFT, P1-P3 AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2................................................ 6 FIGURE 4 -SUBJECT SITE NORTHEAST OF THE CORNER OF FIR STREET AND 7TH AVENUE SOUTH WITH SHELLABARGER CREEK TO THE WEST AND SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION (FACING SOUTH. (IMAGE SOURCE: GOGGLE MAPS STREET VIEW)............................................................. 8 iii Packet Pg. 221 1.0 INTRODUCTION Wetland Resources, Inc. (WRY conducted a site investigation on April 1, 2020 to identify and evaluate jurisdictional wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas on and in the vicinity of the 0.34-acre parcel located at 1055 71h Avenue South, in Edmonds, Washington, (parcel #00619400400600). The site is identified as a portion of Section 25, Township 27N, Range 03E, W.M. and is located within the Puget Sound drainage basin in the Cedar- Sammamish Watershed, Water Resources Inventory Area (WRIA) 8. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Th Avenue South and Fir Street. The property is developed with a single-family residence and detached garage. The remainder of the site consists of maintained lawn and landscaping. Topography of the site slopes to the west. Soils on the site are mapped by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) web soil survey as Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes. Surrounding land use consists of single- family residential use. Shellabarger Creek, a Type F stream, is located to the southwest of the site and a tributary to Shellabarger Creek (also Type F) is located to the west of the site. Prior to conducting the site investigation, public resource information was reviewed to gather background information on the subject property and the surrounding area in regards to wetlands, streams, and other critical areas. These sources included the following: Figure 1 -Aerial view of subject property (Not to scale) 1055 71h Avenue South 1 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 222 3.0 REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA USDA/NRCS Web Soil Survey Soils on the site are mapped Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes. This soil map unit is described as moderately well drained and contains inclusions of Norma (5 percent), which is a hydric soil typically found in drainageways. City of Edmonds GIS Interactive Map The City of Edmonds GIS interactive online map depicts Shellabarger Creek to the southwest of the property. The stream is intermittently piped downgradient of the subject site. Snohomish County PDS Map Portal PDS Map Portal depicts Shellabarger Creek as a Non -Fish Habitat Seasonal Stream to the southwest of the property. Approximately 0.4 miles downstream of the site it is shown as a Fish Habitat stream. Two Snohomish County inventoried wetlands are shown in the vicinity of the site. One is located approximately 365 feet south to the south, and the other is approximately 235 feet to the west. Both of these wetlands are associated with Shellabarger Creek. USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) NWI depicts a Riverine, Intermittent, Streambed, Seasonally Flooded feature southwest of the subject site. DNR Wetlands of High Conservation Value Interactive Map This resource does not depict any features on or near the subject property. DNR Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool (FPAM7) This resource depicts a stream to the southwest of the subject site. The stream is shown as a Type N stream south of Fir Street, with a stream type break just south of Fir Street. From that location it is shown as a Type F stream to the north. WDFW SalmonScape Interactive Mapping System SalmonScape shows Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) presence in Shellabarger Creek, based on lack of gradient barriers. StreamiVet Mapper The StreamNet Mapper interactive online mapping tool depicts migration of Coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp. clarkii) in Shellabarger Creek approximately 0.4 miles downstream of the subject site. WDFW Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Interactive Map PHS does not depict any features on or in the vicinity of the site. Occurrence/migration of Coho and Resident coastal cutthroat is depicted in Shellabarger Creek approximately 0.4 miles 1055 7th Avenue South 2 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 223 downstream of the subject site. 4.0 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION 4.1 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION METHODOLOGY Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) boundaries of lakes, streams, and marine waters are determined through use of methodology presented in The Washington State Department of Ecology document Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark for Shoreline Management Act Compliance in Washington State (Anderson et al 2016). Designation of streams and lakes is consistent with the water typing system established in the Washington Administrative Code MAC) 222-16-030. Wetland boundaries were determined using the routine approach described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). Under the routine methodology, the process for making a wetland determination is based on three steps: 1.) Examination of the site for hydrophytic vegetation (species present and percent cover); 2.) Examination of the site for hydric soils; 3.) Determining the presence of wetland hydrology 4.1.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria The Corps Manual and 2010 Regional Supplement define hydrophytic vegetation as "the assemblage of macrophytes that occurs in areas where inundation or soil saturation is either permanent or of sufficient frequency and duration to influence plant occurrence." Field indicators are used to determine whether the hydrophytic vegetation criteria have been met. Examples of these indicators include, but are not limited to, the rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation, a dominance test result of greater than 50%, and/or a prevalence index score less than or equal to 3.0. 4.1.2 Soils Criteria The 2010 Regional Supplement (per the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils) defines hydric soils as soils "that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Field indicators are used to determine whether a given soil meets the definition for hydric soils. Indicators are numerous and include, but are not limited to, presence of a histosol or histic epipedon, a sandy gleyed matrix, depleted matrix, and redoximorphic depressions. 1055 71h Avenue South 3 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 224 4.1.3 Hydrology Criteria Wetland hydrology encompasses all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season. Areas with evident characteristics of wetland hydrology are those where the presence of water has an overriding influence on the characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and chemically reducing conditions, respectively. The strongest indicators include the presence of surface water, a high water table, and/or soil saturation within at least 12 inches of the soil surface. 4.2 WETLAND AND STREAM BOUNDARY DETERMINATION FINDINGS No wetlands or streams were identified on the subject property. Shellabarger Creek is located approximately 60 feet southwest of the property. Shellabarger Creek flows from the south, on the south side of Fir Street, enters the piped stormwater drainage system where it is directed to the west paralleling Fir Street for approximately 177 feet, and then to the north under Fir Street, emerging into an open channel and continuing to the north. Approximately 48 feet west of the property there is also a small tributary to Shellabarger Creek that emerges from the piped stormwater system at the northwest corner of Fir Street and 7th Avenue South and flows west in an open channel for approximately 108 feet before entering another stormwater pipe. It emerges again approximately 98 feet to the west and merges with Shellabarger Creek. Downstream, Shellabarger Creek continues to be intermittently piped. 4.2.1 Shellabarger Creek Cowardin Classificiation: Riverine, Upper Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Mud City of Edmonds Classification: Type F City of Edmonds Buffer: 100 Shellabarger Creek and its tributary are approximately 4 to 6 feet in width in the vicinity of the subject site. These channels have a mud substrate and a gradient of approximately 5 percent. Some publicly available resources depict the stream as seasonally flowing. At the time of the April 1, 2020 site investigation, the stream was flowing. Per Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.90.010(A)(1), Shellabarger Creek is identified as an anadromous fish -bearing (Type F) stream in the City of Edmonds. Pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040(D)(1), Type F anadromous fish - bearing streams adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access receive 100-foot standard protective buffers. 1055 71h Avenue South 4 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 225 Figure 2-Shellabarger Creek and piped stormwater drainage system in the vicinity of the subject property. P1-P3 indicate the locations of photos pictured in Figure 3. (Image source: City of Edmonds GIS interactive online map) 1055 71h Avenue South 5 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 226 Figure 3 -Photographs of Shellabarger Creek in the vicinity of the subject site. Clockwise from the top left, P1-P3 as shown in Figure 2. 1055 71h Avenue South 6 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 227 5.0 WILDLIFE The subject property is developed with a single-family residence, detached garage, and maintained lawn and landscaping. The site provides minimal habitat for wildlife. Mammalian species expected to occur on or near the site include gray squirrel (Sciurus spp.) and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Given the habitat available, it is expected that the following avian species may use the area: American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia), Black -capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapilla), and Dark -eyed Junco (junco hyemalis). Publicly available online resources depict Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Resident coastal cutthroat (Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp. clarkii) in Shellabarger Creek approximately 0.4 miles downstream of the subject site with no gradient barriers to preclude fish from reaching the portion of the stream in the vicinity of the site. As the stream is intermittently piped downstream of the site, it is unknown whether anadromous fish can access the stream channels in the vicinity of the subject property. 6.0 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS The standard prescribed 100-foot protective buffers of Shellabarger Creek and its tributary to the southwest and west of the subject site would extend onto the southwestern corner of the property. However, the on -site portion of the buffer is physically and functionally isolated from the stream channels by existing paved roads (Fir Street and 71h Avenue South). The basis of this assessment comes from review and analysis of Best Available Science on the topic of buffer functions. Chapter 5 of the Washington State Department of Ecology guidance document entitled "Freshwater Wetlands in Washington State Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science" provides a comprehensive analysis of buffer functions. The following, taken directly from the aforementioned document, is a list of the functions provided by buffers: 1.) removing sediment; 2.) removing excess nutrients; 3.) removing toxics; 4.) influencing microclimate, 5.) maintaining adjacent habitat; 6.) screening adjacent disturbances; and 7.) maintaining habitat connectivity. Functions numbered 1-3 relate to water quality improvement. Stormwater from the subject property flows into the piped stormwater drainage system via catch basins located at the northeast corner of Fir Street and 71h Avenue South (See Figure 2). No surface water from the site flows directly into the stream channels. Therefore, the water quality improvement function provided by the on -site portion of the prescribed buffer is physically interrupted from the open stream channels. Function 4 relates to the influence of the buffer on microclimate. The presence of Fir Street and 71h Avenue South interrupts the microclimate created by vegetation adjacent to the streams, disconnecting it from the microclimate occurring on the subject site. Therefore, the on -site 1055 71h Avenue South 7 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 228 portion of the prescribed buffer does not influence the microclimate of Shellabarger Creek and its tributary. Functions numbered 5-7 relate to wildlife habitat. Buffer isolation created by the roads eliminates connectivity of the subject property to the streams for all but avian species. Due to the disconnection, the on -site portion of the prescribed buffer does not provide a significant influence on wildlife habitat functions of the streams. Pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, adjacent areas that are physically separated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established structures or paved areas may be exempt from the prescribed buffer widths when it is demonstrated that the interrupted buffer area is functionally isolated. Because there is no biological habitat connection nor a surface water connection between the stream features and the subject property as discussed above, WRI has determined that the on -site portion of the stream buffer is physically and functionally isolated from the stream channels. The functional buffer adjacent to the stream channels terminates at the edge of the pavement of Fir Street and 7th Avenue South and does not extend onto the subject property. Figure 4 shows the location of the stream channels relative to the subject property, physically separated by Fir Street and 71h Avenue South. Figure 4 -Subject site northcast of the corner of Fir Street and 71h Avenue South with Shellabarger Creek to the west and southwest of the intersection (facing south). (Image source: Google Maps street view). 1055 71h Avenue South 8 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 229 7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Shellabarger Creek and a tributary are located to the southwest and west of the subject property. They are Type F streams and receive standard 100-foot protective buffers. The functional buffers on these streams is interrupted by Fir Street and 7th Avenue South and therefore does not extend onto the subject property. No other wetlands or streams occur in the vicinity of the subject property. Therefore, no stream or buffer impacts will result from the proposed project. S.O USE OF THIS REPORT This Wetland and Stream Determination and Functional Assessment Report is supplied to Select Homes, Inc. as a means of evaluating the off -site wetland and associated buffer as required by the City of Edmonds during the permitting process. This report is based largely on readily observable conditions and, to a lesser extent, on readily ascertainable conditions. No attempt has been made to determine hidden or concealed conditions. The laws applicable to environmentally critical areas are subject to varying interpretations and may be changed at any time by the courts or legislative bodies. This report is intended to provide information deemed relevant in the applicant's attempt to comply with the laws now in effect. The work for this report has conformed to the standard of care employed by wetland ecologists. No other representation or warranty is made concerning the work or this report, and any implied representation or warranty is disclaimed. Wetland Resources, Inc. Joie Goodman Associate Ecologist 1055 71h Avenue South 9 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 230 9.0 REFERENCES Anderson, P.S., Meyer, S., Olson, P., and E. Stockdale. 2016. Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark for Shoreline Management Act Compliance in Washington State. Washington State Department of Ecology. Publication # 16-06-029. Cowardin, et al., 1979. Classfcation of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior. FWS/OBS-79/31. December 1979. Edmonds, City of. 2020a. Edmonds Community Development Code, Title 23 Natural Resources. Ordinance 4175, passed February 25, 2020. Edmonds, City of. 2020b. City of Edmonds GIS Webmap. http://www.edmondswa.gov/gls-text.html. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.0 Melvin. 2016. Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast 2016Regional Wetland Plant List. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Munsell Color. 2012. Munsell Soil Color Book. Munsell Color, Grand Rapids, MI. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission PSMC). 2020. StreamNet Mapper. http://www.streamnet.org/data/interactive-maps-and-gis-data/. Sheldon, D., T. Hruby, P. Johnson, K. Harper, A. McMillan, T. Granger, S. Stanley, and E. Stockdale. March 2005. Wetlands in Washington State - Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science. Washington State Department of Ecology. Publication #05-06-006. Olympia, WA. Snohomish County. 2020. PDS Map Portal online interactive mapping tool. https://snohorm*shcountywa.gov/3752/PDS-Map-Portal US Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2. 0). Vicksburg, MS US Department of Agriculture -Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. http://websollsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Online Mapper. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020a. Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Interactive Map. http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/phsontheweb/. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020b. SalmonScape Online Mapping Application. http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html. 1055 71h Avenue South 10 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 231 Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2020a. Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool (FPAM7). https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/protectiongis/fpamt/index.html#. Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2020b. WA Wetlands of High Conservation Value online mapping tool. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/NHPwetlandviewer. 1055 71h Avenue South 11 Wetland & Stream Determination and WRI #20060 Functional Assessment Report April15, 2020 Packet Pg. 232 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment Introduction Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The City of Edmonds initiated a Comprehensive Plan map amendment in 2019 on four parcels around the Haines Wharf marina in 2019. The Planning Board reviewed the potential map amendment at two meetings including a public hearing on April 10, 2019 and forwarded a recommendation of approval following the public hearing. (See attached staff report and two sets of minutes.) Shortly after the public hearing, the City was approached by a party that was considering purchasing the Haines Wharf Marina. The Comprehensive Plan map amendment was paused while the party conducted their due diligence. There has been no activity on the Haines Wharf property so the City is continuing with presenting the Comprehensive Plan map amendment to the Council for consideration. Staff Recommendation Schedule public hearing for September 1, 2020 for public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan map amendment. Narrative The City of Edmonds is initiating a Comprehensive Plan map amendment for the Haines Wharf site and adjacent properties. The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) in 2017. Prior to the comprehensive SMP update, Haines Wharf had an Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation. The shoreline designation for the Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update process. Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code: The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment (Aquatic 1) is to protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark (ECDC 24.30.030.A). The current Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the property is Mixed Use Commercial and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The SMP only allows commercial development and uses in the Aquatic I environment when it is associated with a permitted use on the abutting upland shoreline areas. The abutting upland areas are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential I, both of which prohibit commercial uses. As such, no commercial use or development could occur on the subject properties consistent with the SMP. Packet Pg. 233 7.2 Given the SMP update, the City has initiated the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. The attached staff report provides a detailed evaluation of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and findings consistent with ECDC 20.00.050. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Staff Report - Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Exhibit 2: January 23, 2019 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 3: April 10, 2019 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 234 7.2.a ''?c. 184)" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION To: E onds' Plannine Board From: - - ernen Lien Environmental Programs Manager Date: April 5, 2019 File: AMD20180011 Hearing Date, Time, and Place: I. INTRODUCTION April 10, 2019 at 7:00 PM, Edmonds City Council Chambers Public Safety Complex 250 - 5th Avenue North The City of Edmonds has initiated a Comprehensive Plan map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation of the Haines Wharf parcels from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) in 2017. Prior to the comprehensive SMP update, Haines Wharf had an Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation (Attachment 1). The shoreline designation for the Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update (Attachment 2). Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code: The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment (aquatic I) is to protect, restore, and CD manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark (ECDC 24.30.030.A).° The current Comprehensive Plan map designation for the property is Mixed Use Commercial (Attachment 3) and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (Attachment 5). The structures on the Haines Wharf property have been deteriorating for years while the w property owner has been unsuccessful in obtaining and/or finalizing development permits for the property. Given the recent SMP update, the City is initiating the Comprehensive Plan E map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation to a more appropriate U r a Packet Pg. 235 7.2.a designation consistent with the Shoreline Master Program. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND ANALYSIS A. Site Context The subject of this Comprehensive Plan map amendment are the four parcels that are adjacent to and contain Haines Wharf (also known as Meadowdale Marina). See Attachment 3. The parcel numbers from north to south are 00513900100100, 00513900100200, 00513900100700, and 00513900101200. Tax parcel number 00513900100700 is the parcel that contains the Haines Wharf structure. The four parcels are owned by Snohomish County (00513900100100), Jeri Ann Merritt (00513900100200), Meadowdale Marina LLC (00513900100700) and the City of Edmonds (00513900101200). The subject site is located west of the railroad right-of-way in the tide lands of Puget Sound. Access to the site is limited due to the presence of the railroad and a locked gate preventing access to the Marina. Landward of the property is Haines Wharf Park and single-family residential properties with RS-12 (Single-family residential; 12,000 square feet minimum lot size) and RS-20 (Single-family residential; 20,000 square feet minimum lot size) zoning. Historically, there had been two structures on the property. A wooden barn like structure was barged in circa 1939. This was the original Haines Wharf that operated as a full - service sport fishing facility for 30 years. Around 1970 the property was sold and a second metal structure was constructed on the site in 1975. The site was renamed Meadowdale Marina and shifted from a full -service sport fishing business to boat storage. According to City3 records there has not been a business license for the site since 2001, although an application for a business license was applied for in 2008 but never issued. The current owner of the Haines Wharf structure (Meadowdale Marina LLC) applied for and received a shoreline permit substantial development permit in 2005 to reconstruct the then existing timber portion of the peer. While the shoreline permit was issued, it was recognized that the structures on the site were nonconforming structures and conditions added noted that if any of the structures were moved any distance (emphasis in the original condition) they would have to be demolished. Other conditions noted the project would have to comply with conditions imposed by Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, and Natural Resources, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The property owner was not successful in receiving all of the approvals to reconstruct the in pier and over time, the Haines Wharf structure and wooden pier deteriorated and no longer exists. The metal 1975 structure still exists on the site and is connect via a narrow walkway to the shoreline. x w The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment t Page 2 of 7 r Q Packet Pg. 236 7.2.a (SMP) in 2017 which changed the shoreline environmental designation of the site. Prior to the 2017 update, the Haines Wharf properties had an Urban Mixed use II shoreline designation (Attachment 1). The shoreline designation for Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update (Attachment 2). Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC): The purposed of the aquatic low -intensity environment (aquatic 1) is to protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark. (ECDC 24.30.030.A) The SMP's Restoration Plan also identifies the Haines Wharf structures (Meadowdale Marina in the Restoration Plan) as a restoration opportunity. The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Mixed Use Commercial (Attachment 3) and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). B. Notice Pursuant to Chapter 20.03 ECDC, a notice of the public hearing was posted at the subject site, mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site and published in the Everett Herald. Additional, the notice of public hearing was posted at the library, City Hall, and the Public Safety Complex. C. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. D. Edmonds Community Development Code Compliance In accordance with ECDC 20.00.050, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan may be adopted only if the findings in ECDC 20.00.050 can be made. Below are the required findings and staff analysis: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public interest; Staff Findings: The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject properties is Commercial Mixed Use. The Comprehensive Plan does not have any goals or policies specific to the Commercial Mixed Use designation like some of the other commercial designation; however, the Comprehensive Plan does contain some general goals and policies that apply to all commercial areas. Commercial Development Goal A provides: Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being r consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically w feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds c aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment E V Page 3 of 7 Q Packet Pg. 237 7.2.a residents and tourists in a safe, convenient and attractive manner, in accordance with the following policies: A.2 Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. The property is located in a residential neighborhood with no other commercial activity in the area. To access the site, one would have to travel through local streets (as classified by the City's Transportation Plan) and cross the railroad tracks where there is no signaled crossing. So commercial development of the site is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, nor is there safe access to the site. As previously noted, the shoreline environmental designation for the site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive update of the City's Shoreline Master Program. Regarding commercial uses within the Aquatic I shoreline environment, the ECDC 24.6n-n3n-D-9 nrnviriPc- ---------- 1---------- Aquatic 1. Commercial and light industrial use and development are prohibited, except that water -dependent uses and appurtenant structures may be permitted subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline area designation. Pursuant to ECDC 24.60.030.D.9, commercial development and uses are only permitted within an abutting upland shoreline designation. The two abutting shoreline designations are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential I. Pursuant to ECDC 24.60.030.D.1 and D.2, commercial uses and development are prohibited in the Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential I shoreline environments. Since no upland commercial use either exists or is allowed, no commercial development could be permitted on the subject properties. So consistent with the Commercial Development Goal A.2, the subject properties should be reclassified for other uses. The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Open Space. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following with regards to Open Space. General. Open space is important in defining the character of the Edmonds area = and should be preserved and enhanced for enjoyment by current and future generations. Open space serves many functions ranging from providing recreation to protecting aesthetics and biodiversity. CU Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining in the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies. A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: w A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are a AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment E Page 4 of 7 r Q Packet Pg. 238 7.2.a linked wildlife corridors or habitats of rare or endangered species. Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: 8.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. Numerous fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland habitats for either part or all of their life stages. Shellfish resources include clams, mussels, crab, and shrimp. Eight species of salmonids use nearshore areas of Puget Sound at some point in their life cycle. These include Chinook (a critical prey species for the endangered resident Puget Sound Orca), chum, coho, sockeye, pink salmon and sea -run cutthroat trout, steelhead, and bull trout. Several federally listed threatened or endangered species also inhabit marine waters within the City. These include federally listed threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout. Federally listed marine mammals such as the Steller sea lion and Puget Sound Orcas are also present in the Edmonds shorelines. Open Space Goal B specifically recognizes that the Puget Sound and our saltwater shorelines should receive special consideration for preservation. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the rest of the shoreline area from the subject properties south to Brackett's Landing South are also designated as Open Space. The proposed Open Space Comprehensive Plan designation for the properties is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City, Staff Findings: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City. The Open Space designation for the site implements the Shoreline Master Program and could help preserve and enhance habitat for federally threatened species. Access to the site with the unsignaled crossing is a safety concern. The low intensity Open Space designation is more appropriate for the site. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City, and, Staff Findings: There is one other area with the Mixed Use Commercial r Comprehensive Plan designation. This area is centered on the 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W intersection (Attachment 4). These urban upland areas are more w appropriate for commercial uses than the Puget Sound tidelands. Additionally, there aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment E Page 5 of 7 f° Q Packet Pg. 239 7.2.a are many other areas of the City that allow for commercial development, and the removal of this nonconforming site from the commercial designation will not impact the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. 4. In the case of an amendment to the comprehensive policy plan map, the subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use developments(s), including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. Staff Findings: The subject property is not physically suitable for the current Mixed Use Commercial designation. The landward neighborhood is a single-family residential area. The railroad tracks impose a physical obstacle to access to the site, and the Shoreline Master Program prohibits commercial development at the site and on the abutting upland properties. The proposed Open Space designation is more appropriate for intended land use of the area and more compatible with the adjoining land uses. III. CONCLUSIONS A. The existing structure on the site is nonconforming and could not be expanded in any way. B. The Shoreline Master Program prohibits commercial use or development on the subject properties as well as the abutting upland properties. C. The exiting railroad is a safety issue for access to the site. D. The Puget Sound shorelines provide critical habitat for federal listed species. An Open Space Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is consistent with the goals and polices of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Master Program. The proposed amendment is consistent with the required findings of ECDC 20.00.050.1 IV. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of facts, analysis, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff proposes that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to APPROVE the Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. V. ATTACHMENTS 1. Old Shoreline Master Program Environmental Designations r 2. Current Shoreline Master Program Environmental Designations 3. Vicinity Comprehensive Plan Map w 4. City Wide Comprehensive Plan Map a� AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment t Page 6 of 7 Q Packet Pg. 240 7.2.a 5. Vicinity Zoning Map 6. 2017 Aerial Photo VI. PROPERTY OWNERS City of Edmonds 121— 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Jeri Ann Merritt PO Box 5142 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Snohomish County Property Management Division 3000 Rockefeller Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Vladan Milosavljevic Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98037 AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 241 rr,F I 7.2.a Legend 7-1 Haines Wharf Parcels I -q kk A a 15-604,— 1562G 15700 4 711 W r.+ Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 Shoreline Designation Scale a 1 inch = 400 feet Attachment 2 Packet Pg. 243 7.2.a Legend Haines Wharf Parcels 7026 -4 15t 7120 7110. 1562o 157 7029 5t�u 15631 15718 7119 7117 r 115700 15722 15715 15702 M N 15701 706 15724 15719 15712 7.14 722 15725 15728 7329. 15734 1 S 15730 1 8 6 7400 1 8 8 7324 1185, 9908.! 1 I I o w 15805 5910 59251 15917 15910 5927 5912 7(09 15917 429 15920 00 °sy o o 16121 006 co m 3 1220 1 08 16007 tool �c� 1603 601 a 16A16 ' �6719. �s ed Use Commercial w / q 6.106 1610 � .� 1611a CF �O ti 16120 ? 1611 6^ n�O 1613 na 6121 16122 162ND ST SW 510 16202 76, 16209 1 16209 16206 6234 0 16236 0 N N N. nbl 6310 3 16221 16238 16228 �y 16311 0 16222 16232..•' Al 16320 Single -Family Resource)6 1631a a 1631516320 16330 N ' V) 16319 7316 7212. N M 7109 "' 16340 i. w j ^ 16323 16322 j 4 164TH ST SW 16411 7317' "� M �6 7404 0 -IT o o 0 V M 16 2 d 9 7320 164TH PL SW 16419 ^ I,- 16431 7406 �7314 ' °o : _N o L�I O M 7306 ; to 16423 7028 6510 , � � � 16515 ' 1 16520 16520 16510 16501 N y N N I1#12. m ^ ^ m 1 ' ' 7130 0 c 16525 N o M 7124 W to ^ n ro i V' N sz Q 16621 16612 16618toSp 6 ID H 16611 W Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 u Comprehensive Plan Designation Scale a 1 inch = 400 feet . . jr" Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 244 elm =goIsolo] sle 7.2.a Legend Haines Wharf Parcels 00 - 1r 7 I 9:-37 I W Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 2017 Aerial Photo Scale Q 1 inch = 400 feet Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 247 7.2.b Board Member Monroe asked for a status report on the public process related to housing. He asked if the issue would come back to the Planning Board at some point in the future. Mr. Lien answered that a public open house was held on January 10' and was well attended. Board Member Crank said she did not attend the public meeting, but the ad hoc housing group is having its final meeting on January 31". She anticipates the meeting will include information and feedback that was gathered from the last two open houses, and it will likely be the official ending of the group. Board Member Monroe asked if a work product would result from the housing group meetings, and Board Member Crank answered no. She explained that the group was intended to be a type of stop gap to allow a pause and an opportunity to work the Housing Strategy back to what it was supposed to be. At the group's last meeting, it was discussed that a Housing Commission could potentially be formed. If a Housing Commission is appointed, she suggested it might be helpful for them to meet jointly with the Planning Board. HAINES WHARF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT INTRODUCTION (FILE NO. AMD20180011) Mr. Lien advised that this is a City -initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment that involves four parcels in the Haines Wharf area. The City owns a small parcel, and the other three are privately owned. Notice letters were sent to the three property owners, but no response has been received to date. Mr. Lien explained that the current Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the properties is Mixed Use Commercial and the properties are zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The only other area in the City that is zoned Commercial Waterfront is near the downtown and near the Port of Edmonds. The remainder of the tidelands are zoned Open Space (OS). With the exception of a few properties that are zoned Mixed Use Commercial, properties further shoreland are zoned Single Family Resource (RSW). RS-20 requires a lot size of at least 20,000 square feet and RS-12 requires a lot size of at least 12,000 square feet. He also advised that the existing structure on the subject parcels has been deteriorating over the years. Mr. Lien said the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is primarily an outgrowth of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) update. He provided an image to depict the old shoreline designation for the properties and explained that under the old SMP, the areas were intensely developed with a mixed use of commercial, port facilities, multi -modal transit facilities, railroad facilities and limited light industrial uses. With the recently updated SMP (2017), the shoreline designation was changed to Aquatic I. The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment is to protect, restore and manage the unique characteristic and resources of the areas waterward of the Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM). The City initiated the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation to a more appropriate designation consistent with the SMP. At the request of Board Member Lovell, Mr. Lien shared information about the properties that were developed under a Planned Residential Development and a Contract Rezone. Board Member Monroe requested clarification about what property the existing building is located on, and Mr. Lien answered that part of it is on private property and part is on state tidelands. The current tideland lease with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is month -to -month. He explained that before the wooden structure deteriorated, the property owner applied for a shoreline permit to refurbish the site. The structure was non -conforming under both the current and previous SMP. The property owner obtained a shoreline permit from the City but was unable to get a permit from the other government agencies. At this time, nothing is being pursued. Board Member Monroe asked if the other permits would have been required if the structure was located entirely on the private property. Mr. Lien responded that a variety of state agency permits would be required because the structure is located within navigable waters. To further clarify the proposal, Mr. Lien explained that zoning overlay, shoreline designation and Comprehensive Plan vi designation are different designations that apply to the site. The zoning designation has to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed -Use Commercial, and both the zoning designation and Comprehensive Plancc designation must be consistent with the SMP. Currently, the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations are not consistent, and staff is proposing that the Comprehensive Plan Map designation be changed from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space (OS), which is consistent with rest of the tidelands next to the residential areas in North Edmonds (from the subject parcels all the way to Brackett's Landing South). Mr. Lien reminded the Commission that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can only be adopted if the following w findings are made: m • Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the public interest? z Q Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 248 7.2.b • Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City? • Does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City? • Is the subject parcel physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development, including, but not limited to, access provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining and uses and absence of physical constraints. Mr. Lien explained that the Comprehensive Plan requires the City to develop and implement the SMP consistent with the Shoreline Management Act (SMA), and that is the purpose of the proposed amendment. When the amendment comes back to the Board for a public hearing, he will present a staff report to further explain how the proposed change is consistent with the four criteria. He summarized his presentation by stating that the next step would be a public hearing by the Planning Board in March, followed by a recommendation to the City Council. Board Member Lovell observed that one sliver of the property is owned by the City and the other three are privately owned, and the entire Haines Wharf complex is crumbling into the Sound and causing pollution. He asked if the Corps of Engineers has anything to say about the future of this property and the existing structure. Mr. Lien responded that number of agencies have been watching the structure decay over the years with nobody really stepping up and taking the lead. The Department of Ecology (DOE) has stepped in from time to time, as has the DNR because of the lease. After a significant storm a few years ago, the City made the property owners remove the wood portion and stabilize the rest of the structure. Pollution no longer occurs during high tide and/or significant storms. However, it is still a nonconforming structure that is inconsistent with the SMP, and not a lot can be done with the site beyond maintaining it in its current condition. Board Member Lovell asked if the properties would be considered undevelopable if the Comprehensive Plan Map designation is changed to OS. Mr. Lien shared a zoning map and explained that, currently, the Haines Wharf properties are designated as Commercial Waterfront, and the properties from Haines Wharf down to the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant are zoned OS. The properties between the treatment plant and the ferry terminal are zoned RSW-12. The RSW-12 zone was primarily developed for Lake Ballinger, so it has setbacks that are described from the lake edge. The Zoning Code has a chapter for the Marine Resource (MR) zone. Based on his research, the MR zone is supposed to apply to the OS and RSW zones in the tidelands, but it has not been applied to any properties on the zoning map. When it was initially adopted, it was applied to the tidelands outside of the City limits. However, when the City created the new electronic maps, the zone disappeared from the zoning map. Mr. Lien shared details about the MR zone, noting that its purpose is to regulate uses at the tidelands and other lands covered by saltwater, to preserve and enhance the natural marine environment along the shoreline in Edmonds, and to provide local control over the natural marine environment to the extent that state and federal regulations allow. The MR zone allows for permitted uses such as commercial fishing, sports fishing, movement of vessels, swimming, and snorkeling. It also allows uses that require a Conditional Use Permit such as submerged power and communication cables, filling, dredging, submerged construction, breakwaters, bulkheads, scientific installation, marine extraction, mineral extraction from water, marine agriculture and propagation, and educational and recreational facilities. He said that he plans to review this zone further at some point in the future to determine how it could potentially be amended and applied to properties along the shoreline in Edmonds. Mr. Lien again emphasized that the property has three separate designations: Shoreline Environment, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. The current proposal would only amend the Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the subject parcels from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space, which is consistent with the rest of the waterfront. The proposed amendment would make the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the SMP. Changing the zoning will be a separate action that would follow the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Board Member Lovell summarized that a future zoning amendment would involve a look at all of the rest of the zones along N the waterfront relative to tidelands and previous zoning designations, but zoning is not part of the current proposal. Board Member Monroe asked if the Board would consider potential impacts to the property owners as part of any proposed zoning change. Mr. Lien answered affirmatively. Again, he said he has notified the property owners of the proposed w Comprehensive Plan change, but he has not heard back from any of them. +; m E z Q Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 249 7.2.b Board Member Rubenkonig asked for more information about how the federal and state agencies are also involved, given that the properties are classified as tidelands. Mr. Lien explained that a variety of permitting agencies have responsibilities associated with the properties. For example, if the property owners were to apply for a permit, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife would have permit authority and not the City of Edmonds. The DNR would also have permit authority, as would the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which would coordinate with the Natural Marine Fisheries Services. Each of these agencies have different permitting requirements. Only the City of Edmonds implements the SMP and the zoning, but the DNR has a tideland lease. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the DNR would find the proposed change suitable to its mission, and Mr. Lien answered affirmatively. He said he has had numerous conversations with representatives from the DNR over the years as the site has deteriorated. Board Member Rubenkonig asked when the last time the property was commercially viable. Mr. Lien answered that he does not believe there was a commercial operation going on in 2008 when the property owners last applied for a Shoreline Permit. Board Member Rubenkonig asked what is stopping the site from being commercially viable. Mr. Lien explained that the property owners have not secured access from Burlington Northern Santa Fe, so there is no safe crossing across the tracks to the subject parcels. The location is another factor. Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that there were viable businesses on the properties at one point in time. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the owners would be compensated if the properties are rezoned. Mr. Lien said the structure is non -conforming now, and it would remain non -conforming if the proposed amendment is approved. Therefore, the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and subsequent rezone would not really change what is allowed to be there. He further explained that under the current SMP, a covered, over -water structure would not be allowed and the use would be considered non -conforming, as well. If a non -conforming use ceases to exist for a period of time, only conforming uses and structures would be allowed going forward. Board Member Rubenkonig summarized that the structure's commercial viability has been significantly reduced over the past decade. Mr. Lien emphasized that the structure was considered non- conforming under the previous SMP, which was adopted in 2000, so it has been non -conforming for the past 19 years. The intent is not to continue the non-conformance forever, but ultimately for the use to go away. Board Member Rubenkonig summarized her understanding that the proposed amendment would not take away from the property owners' ability to have a business, but they will have to jump through hoops to get it to be viable. This is no different than for any other business in Edmonds. Mr. Lien clarified that the structure can be maintained. However, he is not aware of any commercial activity at the site at this time. He read from the non -conforming section of the code that if a non- conforming use is discontinued for 6 consecutive months of for 12 months during any 2-year period, any subsequent use must be conforming. Board Member Monroe asked if structures could be built on the other properties under the Commercial Waterfront designation. Mr. Lien answered that the property owners would not be allowed to construct a building over the water now. The current SMP no longer allows covered structures over water. Board Member Monroe observed that the value of the properties was significantly reduced when the previous SMP was adopted in 2000. Mr. Lien said all he knows is that the structure was non -conforming when the City issued approval of a Shoreline Permit in 2008 under the old SMP that was adopted in 2000. At least since 2000, the structure type was not allowed and the existing structure was non -conforming. Board Member Monroe asked about the advantage of changing the Comprehensive Plan designation if the existing Mixed Commercial Use designation does not allow development, either. Mr. Lien said the purpose is to make the SMP and Comprehensive Plan consistent with each other. Board Member Monroe clarified that, in functionality, the proposed change would not cause any additional impacts that were not present in 2000. Mr. Lien concurred. Mr. Lien advised that the proposed amendments will come back to the Board for a public hearing in March. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Cheung reviewed that the February 13t1i agenda will include a continued discussion on the Wireless Facilities k Ordinance for small cell standards. w m E z Q Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 250 7.2.c DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Cheung referred the Board to the Development Services Director's Report that was provided in the packet. Board Member Rosen pointed out that the Planning Board meeting is on April 10' and not April 5'. PUBLIC HEARING: HAINES WHARF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING (FILE NO. AMD20180011) Mr. Lien said the subject property is located west of the railroad right-of-way in the tidelands of Puget Sound. The parcels are currently owned by Snohomish County, the City of Edmonds, Jeri Ann Merritt and Meadowdale Marina LLC. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the four parcels as Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC), and the properties are zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The proposed amendment would change the land use designation to Open Space (OS) consistent with the property to the south. Landward of the subject parcels, the land use designation is Single -Family Resource (SFR) and the zoning is Single -Family Residential (RS-12 and RS-20). The property to the south is zoned OS. The current amendment before the Board would not change the zoning at this time. Mr. Lien explained that the properties were previously designated as Urban Mixed Use (UMU), but the 2017 Comprehensive Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update changed the land use designation to Aquatic I. Aquatic I areas are mostly characterized by aquatic ecosystems that have been modified by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad bed fill that covers the intertidal and transitional upland zones along the beach. The beach has been altered by seawalls or larger -rock riprap. These shoreline areas generally exhibit low -intensity development and few overwater structures. In freshwater areas, there may be a significant number of docks and piers serving residential areas. Mr. Lien noted that, historically, there were two structures on the property. A wooden barn -like structure was brought to the site via barge in 1939 and became the original Haines Wharf that was operated as a full -service sport fishing facility for 30 years. Around 1970, the property was sold and a second metal structure was constructed on the site in 1975. The site was also renamed Meadowdale Marina and shifted to primarily being used as boat storage. According to the City's records, there has been no active business license for the site since 2001. The current owner of the Meadowdale Marina site applied for a business license in 2008, but it was never issued. The owner also applied and received a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit in 2005 to reconstruct the existing timber portion of the pier. The permit was issued but it recognized that the structures and uses on the site were nonconforming. Conditions were added to note that, per the City's nonconformance code, moving the structures any distance would require them to be demolished and the new structures would have to comply with the current code. Other conditions noted the project would have to comply with conditions imposed by the Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE), Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WSDFW), the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). From looking at the record, it appears the applicant was not successful in receiving all of the permits needed to go forward with the restoration, and the original wooden structure deteriorated over time and no longer exists. The metal 1975 structure still exists on the site and is connected via a narrow walkway to the shoreline. He provided aerial photographs taken in 2005 and 2017 to illustrate how the conditions on the site have changed, pointing out that the entire wooden structure is gone, the site has been secured, and it is no longer putting debris into the Sound. He noted that the site was also identified in the SMP Restoration Plan as a potential restoration site. Mr. Lien reviewed the criteria that must be considered when considering Comprehensive Plan amendments (ECDC 20.00.050) and shared how the proposal is consistent with each one: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the Q public interest. M Currently, the site is designated as MUC. While there are no provisions in the Comprehensive Plan specific to that designation, some general goals and policies apply to all commercial areas. For example: x w • Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding E z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 251 7.2.c neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds. Staff does not believe the current land use designation is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and there is no safe access to the site. The subject parcels are located in a residential neighborhood with no other commercial activity in the area. There are no arterial or collector streets to the site, which can only be accessed via local streets. Access to the site is further limited due to the presence of the unsignalized railroad crossing and a locked gate preventing access to the marina. Commercial Development Goal A.2. Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. The SMP identifies the subject parcels as Aquatic -I, which prohibits commercial and light industrial uses and development, except water -dependent uses and appurtenant structures may be permitted subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline area designation. The two abutting shoreline environments are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential, and neither allow commercial uses and development. Therefore, commercial uses would not be permitted on the subject parcels, either. Staff believes the site should be reclassified consistent with this goal. • Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies: o A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces. o A.2.b. Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked wildlife corridors or habitats or rare or endangered species. • Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: o B.1. Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. A number of fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland habitat for either part or all of their life stages. There are 8 species of salmonids that frequent the Edmonds Shoreline, and there are also endangered and threatened species (Puget Sound Chinook, bull trout, Steller sea lion, and Puget Sound Orcas. Open Space Goal B specifically recognizes that the Puget Sound and the City's saltwater shorelines should receive special consideration for preservation. Staff believes the proposed OS designation would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and welfare of the City. The main purpose of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is to implement the updated SMP that went through an extensive public process before final adoption in 2017. The proposed new land use designation will help preserve and L enhance habitat for federally -listed species. At this time, access to the site via an unsignalized railroad crossing is a Q safety concern, and staff believes the low -intensity OS designation is more appropriate for the site. M 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. x The only other area in the City that has the MUC designation is in the Medical Highway Activity Center near Highway w 99. The urban upland areas are more appropriate for commercial uses than Puget Sound tidelands, and there are a lot of other areas in the City with commercial designations. Staff believes that removing a nonconforming site would not impact the appropriate balance of land uses when it comes to commercial development in the City. c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 252 7.2.c 4. In case of an amendment to the Comprehensive Policy Plan Map, the subject parcels area physically suitable for the requested land use designations(s) and the anticipated land use development(s), including, but not limited to, access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. The site is not physically suitable for the current MUC designation. The landward neighborhood is single-family residential, and the site can only be accessed via local roads. The railroad tracks impose a physical obstacle to the site, and the SMP prohibits commercial uses and development on the subject parcels. Staff feels the proposed OS land use designation is more appropriate and compatible with the adjoining land uses. Mr. Lien concluded his presentation by recommending the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) to Open Space (OS). Board Member Lovell asked if the remaining metal building on the site is nonconforming, and Mr. Lien answered yes. He explained that the SMP no longer allows overwater structures. Board Member Monroe asked what changing the designation would do since the existing structure and use are already nonconforming. Mr. Lien explained that all of the City's plans, policies and zoning should be consistent with each other, and this is the first step in the process to make the City's Comprehensive Plan consistent with the currently adopted SMP. Next year, the City will review zoning along the waterfront, including zoning for the subject parcels. The City's code has a Marina Resource (MR) zone, but the zoning map does not have any MR zones associated with it. He noted that, currently, most of the City's tidelands are zoned RSW-12, which is the zoning that applies to Lake Ballinger but doesn't make any sense for the tidelands. However, he emphasized that the current proposal is a Comprehensive Plan amendment and not a zoning amendment. Board Member Monroe summarized that the amendment is more of a process change, and development potential on the subject parcels would not change. Board Member Monroe asked what would happen after both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Map have been updated to be consistent with the SMP. Mr. Lien said the wooden structure has been removed and no longer dumps debris into Puget Sound. The City would not force the property owner to do anything with the property, and the existing structure will remain a nonconforming structure, as it has for years. The proposed amendment would not change what the property owner is allowed to do on the site. Board Member Rosen asked if the proposed amendment would have any impact on the current property owners, and Mr. Lien answered that the Comprehensive Plan amendment would not change what the property owners are allowed to do on the site. He explained that any development would have to comply with both the zoning and the SMP. While the zone would remain CW until the shoreline is rezoned, the existing use is still nonconforming based on the SMP, and the SMP rules what can be done on the site. Guy Mansfield, Edmonds, disclosed that he lives close by the subject parcels and has some personal preferences and opinions. However, he will restrict his comments to objective matters. He reviewed the April 5`E' document from the � Planning Commission Advisory Report and found it does a good job of laying out the facts. Specifically, the current a structure is nonconforming. It has been nonconforming in the past and will be nonconforming in the future. It seems like it c would be unfeasible, both in terms of permitting and expenses, to do anything with the property. It is very clear that the SMP N specifically prohibits commercial use of the properties because they abut both residential and the railroad property. He also believes that changing the Comprehensive Plan designation to OS is the right thing to do to be consistent with the SMP. He — L observed that there is a real issue with commercial traffic to the structures. Specifically, all traffic going to the structure Q would have to go down an extremely quiet street that is immediately adjacent to the park. Everyday, he sees children walking on that street as they wander out of the park. He said it seems evident that opening up access to the subject parcels would be an additional disruption to rail traffic. He concluded that the proposed change seems to clearly provide a greater value to the community, more safety for children visiting the park, and better protection for Puget Sound and the environment. W .r c Vice Chair Robles asked what incentive there is for the property owner to remove the structure rather than letting it continue to deteriorate and become an eyesore. If the neighbors were to petition for its removal, he asked if they would be more likely z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 253 7.2.c to prevail under the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning. Mr. Lien said the property is already identified in the SMP as a potential restoration site, but the City cannot force restoration. If someone wants to use the site as restoration c for another project along Puget Sound, they would have to purchase the property from the property owner. Over the years, the DNR and DOE have worked with the property owner to shore up the structures. Since the wood structure has basically deteriorated away, it no longer dumps debris into the Sound during major storms. But there is still an opportunity for c restoration, as removing piers and underwater structures is better for the environment. Again, he said it is not something the City can force on the property owner. +, c d Board Member Monroe asked if the proposed change would make it more likely that the remaining elements of the wood E 13 structure would be removed. Again, Mr. Lien answered that he does not know if the current or proposed land use designation d would make it more or less likely. The property has already been identified as a potential restoration site, regardless of the E land use designation. Q c c� Board Member Lovell asked if the BNSF trains blast their horns as they travel through the area. Mr. Lien said no, the a crossing is gated and locked now, and BNSF no longer recognizes it as a crossing. Access over the tracks to the shoreline would require a person to go over the fence. a� Chair Cheung asked if there have been any issues with kids and homeless people hanging out on the existing structure. Mr. Lien answered that he is not aware of any calls related to vandalism. E 0 Vladan Milosavljevic, General Manager of Meadowdale Marina, advised that the original wooden structure was brought U to the site from Sequim via barge in 1939 and was previously used as a cannery. In 1939, the marina rented out plywood boats for people to use in Puget Sound to fish, etc. During World War II, Mr. Haines offered the marina for war use. He also offered the War Department his boats and manpower to transport the soldiers from Haines Wharf to Whidbey Island. Later on, the facility was used as a Coast Guard station, and then it was used for renting and storing boats. The property has been transferred from Laebugten Boat House, Haines Wharf and then Meadowdale Marina, but the same people owned the property until he purchased it. The metal building was built in 1975 to expand the business and also provide a fuel station for boats. The facility was successful through the mid-80s and generated revenue for the City. When he purchased the property, n he decided to remove the fuel tanks and obtained a permit from the Fire Marshal to do so. x Mr. Milosavljevic continued that in 2002-2003 he started plans to restore the wood structure back to its original use. In w 2004-2005 he obtained a hydraulics permit, as well as permits from the WSDFW, the Army Corps, and DOE. Later on, he also received a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Edmonds. In 2007-2008 he lined up people with c funds to contribute for the project, and everything was ready to go. He applied for a building permit from the City to replace 2 the 45,000 square foot wood pier with steel piling and a concrete deck. He paid the City $25,000 for the plans to be reviewed and a permit to be issued. The building permit was ready for pick up when the economic recession hit and his investors got c scared, and lost the house he built next door that he was planning to live in while he operated the marina. m a c Mr. Milosavljevic said he once again applied for a building permit five years ago. He obtained a permit from the WSDFW and was ready to submit for permits from the Army Corps of Engineers, the DOE and other government agencies, but times 0 were still tough financially. Now he has identified a potential developer, but he has been unable to secure a loan for the a project. The current SMP designation limits what can be done on the property, and this has created a heavy financial burden c for him. The property is no longer worth as much. The SMP was changed so the City can provide a greenbelt along the N waterfront. He questioned how the City could restore the beautiful shoreline unless they get the train tracks off the coastline. He encouraged the Board Members to deny the nonsensical Comprehensive Plan amendment. He said the railroad pollutes — L the coastline more than Meadowdale Marina or nearly everything else. Q Mr. Milosavljevic said that, according to the City Planner, he hasn't done much with the property. However, he has a file full of correspondence, permits, applications and approvals. He has been through the process before, when the Hearing Examiner determined that he could not rebuild the wooden structure if it was torn down, but that is not the case. It cost him money each time he has to defend his proposal to the City of Edmonds. If the proposed amendment is adopted, he will once again w have to go before the Hearing Examiner to fight it out. He strongly urged the Board to recommend denial of the proposed amendment. His intention is to work with his investors to rebuild the wooden structure and clean up the metal structure to become beautiful and a benefit for everyone. z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 254 7.2.c Mr. Milosavljevic explained that the BNSF crossing near his property was established in 1910, and it will cost him between $25,000 and $30,000 to restore the crossing with arms, signals, etc. Safety is very important to him, and when the time comes, he will pay the fee and make the appropriate upgrades. Vice Chair Robles voiced concern that staff is telling the Board that the proposed amendment would have no impact on the property owner, but the property owner is indicating that his property would be significantly impacted. He felt that a lot of issues need to be ironed out before the Board can forward a recommendation to the City Council. Chair Cheung agreed that there needs to be more discussion about how the proposed change might impact the property owners. He asked if there are steps in place for Mr. Milosavljevic to implement his plan. Mr. Lien said it is hard to answer without seeing an actual application. However, he explained that, in addition to the structure being nonconforming, the use is nonconforming, as well. He read from ECDC 20.470.010.D: "If a nonconforming use is discontinued for six consecutive months or twelve months during any two-year period, any subsequent use shall be conforming." During his presentation, he noted that there has not been a business license on the site since 2001. While the property owner applied for a business license in 2008, it was never issued, in part, because of the nonconforming aspect of the site. In his opinion, the way the SMP is spelled out, developing the site would be a very heavy lift, if not impossible. Board Member Monroe asked if the City has sought feedback from a real estate appraiser to determine what the impact of the proposed amendment would be. Mr. Lien answered no. Board Member Monroe said it would be interesting to know the potential damage, but it would probably be difficult to figure out. Board Member Monroe summarized that, currently, the City's position is that nothing can happen on the property based on the current MUC designation. The proposed amendment would definitely make it so the property owner could not do anything else on the property and remove all of the ambiguity out of it. Other than a more streamlined SMP process, there is no real tangible benefit to the amendment. Mr. Lien responded that the amendment is intended to address a consistency issue. Board Member Monroe commented that consistency makes sense from the City's point of view, but the property owner wants to keep fighting for his right to develop the site and there is a process for that to occur. He questioned why the City wants to change the land use designation when the existing designation works just as well. Mr. Lien again said it is to make sure that all the plans, policies and zoning are consistent. Chair Cheung observed that the property owner is clearly still fighting to redevelop the property, and he questioned if Mr. Milosavljevic spoke up when the SMP was changed in 2017. He said he is also concerned about the benefits of the proposed amendment other than for consistency. If there was absolutely no objection to the amendment, he would support it in order to provide consistency. But he has some reservations based on the property owner's concerns. Board Member Lovell cautioned the Board to look at all of the reasons outlined in the Staff Report with respect to consistency for the use of this particular property. It is evident from the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps that the area in question is essentially a dead-end, single-family residential neighborhood. If they are thinking they want to potentially allow the continuation of the existing use or some alternative use other than single-family residential, he does not think it will ever be approved. If they were talking about the feasibility of a real project occurring on the subject parcels, he is not so sure they would be hearing the same discussion. It's also evident from the history that nothing has happened on the site for years other than removal of the wood that continues to pollute Puget Sound. There is an acknowledgement and understanding that, for years and years, the current structures and use have been nonconforming. He said he does not think they would be doing the City justice by putting off the land use change in anticipation of something happening in the future. Chair Cheung said his understanding is that nothing can happen on the site based on the existing land use designation. The Q amendment is simply an administrative change to make the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the SMP. The property owner would not be permitted to restore or redevelop the site in either case. Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that there are several issues being discussed, and some might be outside of the Board's purview. At their last meeting, Mr. Lien carefully explained the status of the owner in terms of having forfeited the ability to w continue the nonconforming use of the business by failing to meet certain criteria throughout the years. If the property owner had kept his business license and permits up to date, he could have continued to enjoy his nonconforming use. However, it is outside of the Board's purview to speak to that issue. Mr. Lien once again referred to the nonconforming use provision and z U c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 255 7.2.c explained that if a nonconforming use is discontinued for six consecutive months or twelve months during any two-year period, any subsequent use must be conforming. He explained that, from the property owner's business records, there has not been a use at the site since 2001. Board Member Rubenkonig acknowledged that this is an uncomfortable situation because the property owner would like to 0 be able to implement his vision for the property. However, there are other factors that must be considered. The Board needs to be very clear about the impact of this nonconforming use. He could have enjoyed it through the years and been using it +, right now, except the licenses and permits to do so were not kept current. Mr. Lien clarified that the property has not been used as a commercial site for years. Nonconforming uses can continue, but they cannot be expanded in any way. There is no E 13 record of a commercial use, nonconforming or otherwise, at this site since at least 2001. d E Board Member Rubenkonig asked how the property owner would challenge the City's interpretation of the nonconforming Q code. Mr. Lien said the SMP has its own nonconforming code, and ECDC 20.70.010 defines what a nonconforming use is. Nonconforming uses are "shoreline uses which were lawfully established prior to the effective date of the Shoreline a Management Act or this master program, or amendments thereto, but which do not conform to the presence regulations or standards of this master program or the policies of the act. " He explained that the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) was passed by the legislature and approved by the voters in 1971, and the Haines Wharf wooden structure was in place long t before that time. The metal structure was constructed in 1974-1975, shortly after the SMA was adopted. He doesn't know a) when the City had its first SMP, but when the permitting went through in 2005, the City had last updated its SMP in 2000. The site has been nonconforming at least since 2000, and from what he can tell, there hasn't been a continued use at the site o at least since 2001. V c� Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that is the point that much is hanging off of, that the use wasn't continued. She asked where the property owner would go to get legal redress. Mr. Lien said staff would work with the City Attorney, but the property owner would have to demonstrate that there has been a commercial use at the site continued since 2001. This same question came up when he was reviewing the file in 2008 when the property owner applied for a business license. Board Member Monroe asked if the property owner would have the ability to sue under the Hearing Examiner. Mr. Lien said n the Comprehensive Plan amendment would have to be appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board and not to the a) Hearing Examiner. Barring the proposed amendment, Board Member Monroe asked what recourse the property owner w would have if the City denied his permit application. Mr. Lien said it would depend on what the permit was for. Generally, w permit decision would be issued by the Hearing Examiner, and that decision would be appealable to the Shoreline Hearings Board. c Board Member Monroe summarized that, as long as the property is designated as MUC, the property owner would have some legal recourse to sue for his rights. He asked if the property owner would retain those same rights if the designation is c changed to OS. Mr. Lien emphasized that the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would not change the zoning. The m current Commercial Waterfront (CW) zoning would remain in place until the City looks at and adjusts the zones along the c tidelands. Board Member Monroe pointed out that the City's intent is to change the zoning following the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Lien answered that the property owner would have the right to sue, regardless of the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation, if the argument is that the nonconforming use should be allowed to continue. Board a Member Monroe asked if the property owner would have less opportunity or a different avenue to sue if the land use and c zoning are changed. Mr. Lien said it would depend on what the application is for. Again, he said the structures and uses are N considered nonconforming under the existing SMP, Comprehensive Plan and zoning. Even if the Comprehensive Plan c designation is changed, the structures and uses will still be nonconforming, and the proposed Comprehensive Plan — L amendment and potential rezone will not change the situation if the structures and uses are found to be nonconforming uses Q that are allowed to continue. M Board Member Cloutier cautioned that the current proposal is a Comprehensive Plan amendment, and there is no proposal to rezone the property at this time. Board Member Monroe felt this approach was a little disingenuous since they know that a rezone proposal will be forthcoming. w c Board Member Monroe asked if redevelopment of the site in the neighborhood of $5 to $10 million would trigger an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Mr. Lien said he would have to see a proposal before making that determination. z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 256 7.2.c Board Member Monroe asked if a traffic analysis would be required as part of the EIS. Mr. Lien responded that, regardless of whether an EIS is required or not, the property owner would likely be required to complete a traffic analysis. However, without a proposal, he cannot say whether or not traffic improvements would be required. At the request of Mr. Milosavljevic, Mr. Lien read a letter dated March 26, 2009 from Mike Clugston, Senior Planner, into the record: "After extensive review of your existing permit approval for Meadowdale Marina Project (SM0594) and the applicable city and state codes, the City has determined that the timeline for your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is not in danger of expiring. In fact, the timeline for Shoreline Substantial Development Permits has yet to begin according to RCW 90.58.153.4, which states `the permit time periods do not include the time during which a use or activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions or due to the need to obtain any other government permit and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed, including all reasonable related administrative or legal actions on any such permit or approvals. Your Shoreline Permit timeline has not started because you are still seeking any other government permits that authorize marina development to proceed. In this case, two building permits, 20080693 and 20080694, as well as a City business license. That said, we are still awaiting a response to your request for additional information with which to complete our review of the above reference permits. If we do not receive the requested information, the building permits will expire on February 12, 2010, which is 18 months from the date the original application for the permits (August 8, 2008). The fee you submitted for your extension letter will be refunded." Mr. Milosavljevic said he never received a refund for the permit fees, so the City is still obligated to the permit application. Mr. Lien responded that the building permits that were referenced in the letter have expired, and he will research whether or not the fee was refunded. Mr. Lien said that, with the SMP update, there was also a change with regard to timelines and the specific provision referenced in the letter. A section was added (ECDC 24.80.140) to outline time requirements for shoreline permits. It reads that, `Authorization to conduct development activities pursuant to a Shoreline Permit issued by the City of Edmonds shall expire five years after the date of issuance provided the activity was not pursued due to impendency of administrative appeals or legal action. " He summarized that, if it takes more than five years to get all the required permits, the Shoreline approval goes away. With regards to the 2009 letter, there are questions as to whether or not the applicant continued to pursue the other permits, and that would be a legal matter that would come up again should the property owner reapply. Board Member Rubenkonig commented that the status of the nonconforming structure and use has nothing to do with the proposed amendment to change the land use designation to OS. The property owner could still seek recourse for his standing as having an active, nonconforming use and/or structure. Mr. Lien agreed that the nonconforming status is separate from the proposed amendment. Mr. Milosavljevic submitted an additional document for the record. Mr. Lien said the document is the hydraulic project approval from the WSDFW. The issue date was October 29, 2012, and the project expiration date was October 28, 2017. c The project name was Meadowdale Marine Upgrades, and the project description was to replace the timber pier, approach N trestle and timber piles with concrete/steel construction. The document also notes a 5-year Hydraulic Project Approval c (11PA) at the request of Rachel Villa on August 18, 2011, which supersedes all other previous HPA's. However, this most — L recent HPA expired on August 28, 2017, so the permit is no longer valid. Mr. Milosavljevic commented that according to the Q documentation he submitted, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is still valid. These other documents extended the expiration date. M Chair Cheung said it does not appear that the property owner's rights would be impacted by the proposed amendment. The only way he can actually move forward with his proposal is by bringing a lawsuit. Mr. Lien said the property owner is W making arguments under the nonconforming code. The property is nonconforming now, and it will remain nonconforming regardless of the land use designation. Chair Cheung said the property owner will not be able to apply for any permits a) through the City, and the only way for him to move his project forward is through legal action. Regardless of whether or not t c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 257 7.2.c the Comprehensive Plan is amended to be consistent with the SMP, the property owners remedy or course of action will remain the same. Board Member Monroe said his understanding is that, as long as the property is designated as MUC, the property owner can apply for a permit. It will get denied, and then he can go through the appeal process. If the designation is changed to OS, the property owner would not have the ability to even apply for a permit. Mr. Lien said that is incorrect. He does not know what the property owner's proposal will be, but given that the site is nonconforming and has been nonconforming since 2001, his approach would remain the same regardless of the zoning or Comprehensive Plan change. The structures and uses are nonconforming under the current zoning and SMP, and have been at least since 2000. That will not change with any action the Board takes tonight or if the City Council ultimately adopts the amendment. Board Member Monroe asked if there is any chance the property owner would be able to tear down the existing facility and rebuild. Mr. Lien answered no. As per the nonconforming code, the building would be destroyed more than 75% of the replacement value. If the building is removed, it could not be reconstructed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (FILE NUMBER AMD20180011) FROM MIXED USE COMMERCIAL TO OPEN SPACE FOR THE WATERFRONT AREA CURRENTLY DESIGNATED AS HAINES WHARF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION'S BRIEFING MEMORANDUM DATED APRIL 10, 2019, WITH ITS INCLUDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION. Board Member Monroe said he does not necessarily like the marina in its current location, and he can see why it makes sense for it to not be there. However, he does not think this is the right avenue by which to cut off that use of the property. They need to allow the property owner to go through the entire application process in order to say for certain that he would not lose any of his use. He has sympathy for the property owner when the government changed the rules and the property is worth less, and the property owner needs to maintain his full set of resources. Board Member Rubenkonig said the property's nonconformance has no bearing on the current issue before the Board. The property owner would still be able to pursue the nonconforming use of the property on his own, regardless of what the Comprehensive Plan designation is. The property will always be nonconforming, and the owner will have to meet the criteria for nonconformance in order to obtain the necessary permits. However, it is outside of the Board's purview to address that issue and staff cannot respond to what might happen in the future when there is no application to refer to. The property owner can pursue whatever he wants to do with his property, and the amendment would not make any difference. She said she expects it will be difficult to support that he has had an ongoing nonconforming use of the property and the structure, but that is the legal route that he must take and a separate issue than what is before the Board at this time. Once again, Board Member Robles voiced concern that there are too many unknowns for the Board to make a recommendation on the proposed amendment at this time. They do not know for sure whether the proposed amendment will impact the property owner or not. There is too much unsettled on both sides, and he cannot support the amendment. Board Member Cloutier pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan does not have any standing in the property owner's c argument related to use. Zoning is what determines his use. When a zoning change is proposed, it must refer to and align N with the Comprehensive Plan. The SMP update has already changed the property and its allowed uses. The current proposal c is to change the Comprehensive Plan, which does not change the zoning or anything that has to do with his use. While — L zoning will be the likely next step, it is not something the Board should be focusing on at this time. He reminded the Board Q to focus on the four criteria that must considered when reviewing Comprehensive Plan amendments. In his mind, the proposal meets all of the criteria. For clarity, he reviewed the criteria again: M 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public interest. W 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and welfare of the City. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. d E z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 258 7.2.c 4. In case of an amendment to the Comprehensive Policy Plan Map, the subject parcels area physically suitable for the requested land use designations(s) and the anticipated land use development(s), including, but not limited to, access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. Board Member Rubenkonig said there appears to still be confusion around the nonconforming use. She asked Mr. Lien to explained again how the nonconforming use would still be present with any future new zone, and the property owner's standing will not change. Mr. Lien said he is hesitant to say that the nonconforming use would still be present, given that if a nonconforming use is discontinued for six months or twelve months over a two-year period, it would not longer be considered a nonconforming use. From what he has seen in the record, a nonconforming structure is still present, but he questions whether a nonconforming use is still present. However, the Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning would have no bearing on the nonconforming aspect of the property. It is nonconforming now, has been nonconforming, and will continue to be nonconforming. Chair Cheung summarized that the Board's responsibility is to make sure the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the SMP, which is the intent of the proposed amendment. The property owner's rights would not be impacted, and his ability to sue would remain the same. Board Member Monroe asked what criteria will be considered when a rezone proposal comes forward for the property next year. Will they be required to address potential impacts to the property owner? Mr. Lien reviewed the rezone criteria outlined in ECDC 20.40.010 as follows: A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; C. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone; E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Board Member Monroe said he can support the proposed amendment based on the clarification provided by staff and Board Members and given that the Board will have another discussion about value when a rezone is brought forward. c m THE MOTION CARRIED 6-1, WITH BOARD MEMBER ROBLES VOTING IN OPPOSITION. c c REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA a Chair Cheung reviewed that the April 24" agenda will include a Vision 2050 Update, a presentation on options to address the c number of units for multifamily in existing multifamily, and a public hearing on an application for a street vacation map N amendment. The May 8" agenda will include a legislative update, as well as a public hearing on potential code amendments � to ECDC 17.40.020 to address nonconformance of existing multifamily development. — L Mr. Lien explained that the City has an official street map that designates future rights -of -way, and the street vacation Q application involves removing the connection from 80' Avenue down to Olympic View Drive. He also explained that options for addressing the number of units for multifamily in existing multifamily were presented to the City Council's Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee on April 9`t'. The nonconforming code says that if a nonconforming structure is destroyed to more than 75% of the replacement value, it shall be reconstructed in full conformance with the Development W Code, and that includes density. At least 20 multifamily developments have been identified that exceed the density allowed by the zone in which they are located. If they were to burn down, they could only be reconstructed to the current density. E Condominium owners are having trouble selling their units because banks won't fund a mortgage if there is a possibility that z c� r Q Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 259 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Climate Target Resolution Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History Edmonds has supported specific climate protection activities for at least a decade, as well as related "sustainability" activities for even longer. In 2017, the Mayor signed the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1389 (attached) to achieve or exceed at the local level the goals established in the Paris Climate Accord. The resolution contains seven sections related to climate issues, particularly for reducing greenhouse gases. On August 4, the City Council considered a presentation about more recent climate activities and reviewed a draft resolution to set a 1.5 degree target. Staff Recommendation Adopt the resolution in Exhibit 1 adopting a 1.5° Celsius target as the City's climate planning goal. Narrative The City of Edmonds is beginning an update to its 2010 Climate Action Plan. In order to develop policies and strategies for the Climate Action Plan update, it is important to establish a goal for the City's climate action planning efforts. Council Resolution No. 1389 directed City Staff and the Climate Protection Committee to recommend a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target to the City Council for both the near term and long term considerations. A strategy for establishing GHG emission reduction targets is to establish a Science -Based Target. Exhibit 2 contains a memorandum discussing science based targets. Within the climate action plan, different temperature targets affect the rate at which GHG emissions need to be reduced and the associated investments and activities required to achieve those reductions. A 2°C target requires less mitigation action per year than a 1.5°C target does. One advantage of adopting a science -based target is that it can remain constant. Over time, the rate of decarbonization necessary to meet the target may go up or down, depending on the success of the climate action plan. The science -based target is the desired endpoint, and decarbonization rates can be adjusted as the primary means of reaching it. A science -based climate target sets a rate of climate action that is aligned with keeping average global temperature increases below a specified level of increase compared to pre -industrial temperatures. Maintaining temperature increases below a 2°C threshold will allow the majority, but not all, of the global population to avoid the worst social and economic effects of climate change. An increase of 2°C is the target set forth by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Paris Climate Accord, and multiple states and cities across the United States. Packet Pg. 260 8.1 The Paris Climate Accord legally binds its signatories to the 2°C target. It also states that signatories will "pursue efforts" toward a 1.5°C target. Inclusion of the additional 1.5°C target is meant to acknowledge that the difference between a 1.5°C and 2°C temperature rise is that the latter will result in "a greater likelihood of drought, flooding, resource depletion, conflict and forced migration" and that "those most at risk will be individuals and communities experiencing multidimensional poverty, persistent vulnerabilities and various forms of deprivation and disadvantage." In 2019, the climate target was discussed by the Climate Protection Committee which recommended that the City pursue efforts to limit the increase in the global average temperature to 1.5°C above pre- industrial levels. Setting a target is key for guiding the update of the City's Climate Action Plan. Exhibit 1 contains a draft resolution to formally recognizing the 1.5°C target for the City of Edmonds. The project status and draft resolution for the 1.5 degree target was a study item for the City Council on August 4, 2020. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Draft Resolution 1.5 Climate Target Exhibit 2: Science -based Target Memorandum Resolution 1389 Packet Pg. 261 8.1.a RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A SCIENCE BASED CLIMATE CHANGE PLANNING TARGET OF LIMITING THE GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE INCREASE TO 1.5 DEGREES CELSIUS ABOVE PRE -INDUSTRIAL TEMPERATURES WHEREAS, climate change poses a grave threat to the health and well-being of this and future generations in Edmonds and beyond; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, the City of Edmonds' Mayor signed the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and stated, "In light of the [President's] decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord, I feel it important for our city to emphasize our local commitment to, and continued effort to improve our environment"; and WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 1389 the Edmonds' City Council fully supported endorsement of the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and also identified new actions to take; and WHEREAS, as a signatory of the Safe Energy Leadership Alliance ("SELA"), Edmonds has committed itself to being a regional and national leader in addressing the adverse impacts of climate change driven by the burning of fossil fuels; and enacted bold policies and programs to reduce emissions from its transportation, building energy, and waste sectors and reduced emissions while its population has grown; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2010 the City of Edmonds completed a Climate Change Action Plan that states replacing fossil fuel -derived energy with renewable energy sources for both city owned building and throughout our community is critical to achieving the greenhouse reduction goals set forth in the City's Climate Action Plan; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1389 noted the City Staff and the Climate and the Climate Protection Committee will establish and recommend to the City Council a GHG emissions reduction target goal for both the near term and long term; and WHEREAS, a science -based climate target sets a rate of climate action that is aligned with keeping average global temperature increases below a specified level of increase compared to pre -industrial temperatures. w WHEREAS, an advantage of adopting a science -based target is that it can remain constant. Over time, the rate of decarbonization necessary to meet the target may go up or down, depending z on the success of the climate action plan. The science -based target is the desired endpoint, and r decarbonization rates can be adjusted as the primary means of reaching it. Q WHEREAS, the Paris Agreement resulted in a commitment from almost every nation to take action and enact programs to limit global temperature increase to less than 2 degrees Celsius, with an expectation that this goal would be reduced to 1.5 degrees in the future; and WHEREAS, in 2019, a science based climate target was discussed by the Climate Protection Committee which recommended that the City pursue efforts to limit the increase in the global average temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre -industrial levels; and 1 Packet Pg. 262 8.1.a WHEREAS, the City is updating the Climate Change Action Plan which will include reviewing specific strategies for meeting the emissions reduction targets based on the City's adopted science based climate target; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. The City Council adopts the science based climate target of limiting the increase in the global average temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre -industrial levels. Section 2. While updating the City's Climate Action Plan, the City will review specific strategies for the Edmonds' share of meeting the 1.5 degrees target as well as tying mitigation with adaption measures where possible. RESOLVED this 18th day of August, 2020. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 2 CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE NELSON x w c m E z U a r r Q Packet Pg. 263 To: Shane Hope, Development Services Director, City of Edmonds From: Joshua Proudfoot, Principal, Good Company, Joshua. Proudfoot(a)goodcompany.com, Aaron Toneys, Senior Assoc., Claudia Denton, Assoc. and Mark Johnson, ESA MJohnson(a)esassoc.com Date: December 21, 2o18 This memorandum is provided as part of the City of Edmonds Climate Action Plan Update. It is intended to assist City decision makers in setting a target for community climate actions. It was prepared by the ESA/Good Company team to give background on setting a science -based target and what the implications of various targets could be. What is a Science -Based Target? A science -based climate target sets a rate of climate action'that is aligned with keeping average global temperature increases below a specified level of increase (such as 2°C) compared to pre -industrial temperatures.' A science -based target is based on the physical characteristics of the earth's atmosphere and how atmospheric changes are expected to affect the biosphere. A science -based target represents an overarching global target that humanity can collectively work toward. Maintaining temperature increases below a 20C threshold will allow the majority, but not all, of the global population to avoid the worst social and economic effects of climate change3. A target of 20C is considered the "guardrail" target by numerous international organizations, including the United Nations3, but any target equal to or more aggressive (e.g., 1.5°C or s.o°C) would also be considered a science -based target. As a point of reference, the average temperature of the earth is approximately 1.2°C higher4 today than at the beginning of the industrial revolution. One advantage of adopting a science -based target is that it can remain constant. Overtime, the rate of decarbonization necessary to meet the target may go up or down, depending on the success of the climate action plan. The science -based target is the desired endpoint, and decarbonization rates can be adjusted as the primary means of reaching it. This report and all documents in the Edmonds Climate Action Plan update use the Celsius temperature scale, as this is the most common in scientific literature worldwide. Please see Table i for Fahrenheit conversion. Bold font indicates the commonly used science -based target numbers. Table 1: Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion table. Science -based targets Other temperatures in this report i° 1.50 20 1.2° 3.30 4.20 1.80 2.70 3.60 2.20 60 7.60 What are the Options? An increase of 2°C is the target set forth by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Paris Climate Accord, and multiple states and cities across the United 1 Climate actions include reducing fossil fuel and other man-made sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as implementing negative emissions strategies. Negative emissions strategies provide more time to decarbonize. 2 A 2'C target is roughly aligned with an atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration of 450 parts per million (ppm). 3 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC ARS). 4 World Meteorological Organization Press Release: Provisional WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2o16. c 0 0 m a� m r E U a goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Pagel Packet Pg. 264 mood COMPANY States. The Paris Climate Accord legally binds its signatories to the 2°C target. It also states that signatories will "pursue efforts" toward a i.5°C target. Inclusion of the additional 1.5°C target is meant to acknowledge that the difference between a 1.5°C and 2°C temperature rise is that the latter will result in "a greater likelihood of drought, flooding, resource depletion, conflict and forced migration" and that "those most at risk will be individuals and communities experiencing multidimensional poverty, persistent vulnerabilities and various forms of deprivation and disadvantage."' Within a climate action plan, different temperature targets affect the rate at which greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions need to be reduced and the associated investments and activities required to achieve those reductions. A 2°C target requires less mitigation action per year than a i.5°C target does. What are the Trade-offs between Targets? c 3 Modern human society built over the past 150 years relies heavily on fossil fuel energy sources; therefore, ,°n accelerating the deployment of renewable and low -carbon energy sources requires large-scale deployment of existing and pending technology as well as significant changes in personal consumption. The 2°C target is intended to strike a pragmatic political and technological balance between limiting the physical impacts of climate change and the time it will take to transition away from fossil fuels and reduce global GHG emissions. However, the 2°C target takes humanity right up to the edge of feedback loops, potentially beyond human r control, that will further accelerate global warming, such as ocean and permafrost releases of methane, or the v melting of the ice caps, which reflect solar heat from the oceans'. More aggressive targets, such as i.5°C, move everyone closer to safety, but require that emissions reductions measures and negative emissions technologies? be implemented more quickly with a greater near -term investment. L What Rates of GHG Reduction are Required by the Different Options? E Table 2 presents three temperature target options or scenarios - a global average temperature increase of i°C, 1.5°C, or 2°C. The decarbonization rates presented on Figure 2 for a 2°C target are based on an IPCC's decarbonization pathway (ARC RCP2.6 scenario). The decarbonization rates for a'..5°C target is based on IPCC's recently released work on this target.' And 1°C is based on a paper by James Hansen, who is best known for his work as a climate scientist at NASA and his work with 350.org and Our Children's Trust.' IPCC does not have a published decarbonization pathway for IPCC 1°C target. The Hansen paper is the best source available to guide decarbonization requirements consistent with the goals of organizations like 350.org, or Eugene, Oregon's Climate Recovery Ordinance. These targets all assume global participation. In other words, the rates presented below are assumed to be complimented by reductions by other nations. A way to think about these rates are - Edmonds contributions z will feed into Washington's contributions, which will feed into US contributions. US contributions will feed into w global actions taken by other nations in accordance with the Paris Accord. r c m Additionally, to reduce to the 350 ppm GHG levels and the subsequent 1°C average temperature increase, the global community will need to utilize "negative emissions" actions and technologies. The most low -tech of 2 these is to utilize existing means of "biological sequestration" —trees and soils. These actions could include a 5 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018), Special Report on Global Warming of ii.s°C. 6 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. 7 Negative emissions refer to the process of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Currently, land management options are available for biological carbon sequestration by forests and agricultural practices. Longer term, negative emissions technologies will need to be developed. The most likely of these technologies is bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration. 8 Hansen et. al. (2011). Scientific Case for Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change to Protect Young People and Nature. Downloaded online at http://www.columbia.edu/-'eh3./mailings/201;t/201;t12O2 PopularSciencePlosOngf.pdf. goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page 2 Packet Pg. 265 mood COMPANY protecting existing forests, planting new trees and forests, and integrating compost into soils to maximize carbon uptake potential. Depending on how rapidly we respond as a globe to mitigation emissions and increase carbon sequestration, we may also need "technological sequestration." These could include technologies currently being developed such as - bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration which would use biological fuel sources and pump the CO2 underground for long-term storage. Other technologies capture carbon from the atmosphere and convert it into solid or liquid form. Unfortunately, these technologies are currently inefficient and therefore expensive to operate at the scale required. Even some of IPCCs modeled decarbonization pathways to reach the Paris Climate Accord target of 2°C assumes that sequestration through negative emission technologies will be required at a large scale9. Table 2: Target options, associated rates of reduction, and other agencies using these temperatures. Target ,... ... Average Annual Rate of Reduction to Meet Target (rounded) 8% 5% 2% Annual Reduction compared to 203.0 (values are rounded for simplicity) By 2020 Is% 13% 10% By 2030 70% 50% 35% By 2050 100% 100% 8o% Others Using These Temperatures Eugene, OR Seattle, WA Paris Climate Accord King County, WA Notes: a. Washington States 2008 goal of So % below lggo emission levels by logo is inadequate to meet a 2 °C increase if adopted globally and is therefore not considered a science -based target. b. Since the atmospheric concentration is already well above 350 ppm and we have passed a warming of 1 °C, the 1 °C Target also requires roughly soo, 000 MT COze of cumulative sequestration on behalf of the Edmonds community between 2030 and 2080 to return to 350 ppm. This is equal to conserving 1, 000 acres of existing U.S. forest annually that would normally be cut for use. For example, if Edmonds wants to adopt a target of 1.50C, it would need to be accompanied by a cumulative reduction goal similar to that established by the City of Seattle. That would mean reducing cumulative emissions to 50 percent below 2010 levels by 203o and ioo percent by 2050. If Edmonds wanted to adopt the 1.o1C target, cumulative emissions would need to be reduced 70 percent by 2o3o, a much faster pace of reduction. The relative costs of offsetting too percent of emission under each of these options are discussed at the end of this memo. Wealth, Consumption, and Responsibility Wealthier nations and households have disproportionately high emissions per capital°. As basic needs are met and disposable income is accumulated, there is an increase in consumption of goods, travel, and services'°. This is illustrated for Edmonds in the 2017 Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory report in the scale of imported or consumption emissions. On the global scale, supply and demand for goods, fuel, and services is also 9 United Nations Paris Agreement 2oi5, Article 4.1. 10 Oxfam 2015 Media Briefing, Extreme Carbon Inequality. E U a goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page Packet Pg. 266 �gftq T 8.1.b unbalanced"°. Some nations have high total emissions due to high production of goods and fuel that are sold to other nations, while their own populations do not have high per capita emissions from consumption",". In contrast, some nations import high amounts of goods and fuel but do not emit high amounts of greenhouse gas emissions directly",". The United States is both a high emitter and a high consumer"o,". China, the United States, and India have the highest total emissions in the world"". However, China and India both have significantly larger populations, lower per capita emissions, lower Gross Domestic Product (total and per capita) and higher levels of poverty",". In contrast, the United States and Canada have the highest consumption footprints per capita"", and among the highest per capita Gross Domestic Product. Figure i present a comparison of COze emissions per household among the G2o nations for which data is available. Figure i also shows how the highest earning io% of households have substantially higher footprints than the average in every country. Edmonds and the United States as a whole have better ability to decrease emissions, due to both the scale of emissions and relative affluence, as compared to the rest of the world population. Many people also consider the responsibility of the United States and affluent communities within the US to be greater for the same reasons. ■ Top 10% ■ Bottom 50% R Bottom 40% ■Average USA CAN GBR ❑EU iTA RUS FRA JPN KOR ZAF MEX TU R ARG CHN BRA IDN IND - 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Household CO2 per capita (tonnes) Figure 1: Per capita lifestyle consumption emissions in G20 countries for which data is available1O. Note: tonnes = metric tons. 11 The World Research Institute, World's Top io Emitters. 50 goodeompany.com _ MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page Packet Pg. 267 Turning the Temperature Target into Action The science -based temperature targets discussed above represent the most commonly cited type of climate target— limiting average global temperature increases. There are a variety of climate targets in the region of this type. • The Paris Climate Accord commits signatories to at least a 20C target. • King County, WA passed Ordinance 17270 limiting emissions consistent with a 2°C target. • Seattle, WA passed Resolution 31312 adopting a target of net -zero GHG emissions by 205o and a 1.5°C target. • The City of Beaverton OR selected i.5°C as their community target. o • The City of Eugene OR selected 10C as their community target. • Other groups, such as 350.org, are focused on a 1°C target to further limit the negative societal impacts of climate change. r • The Washington State legislature adopted reduction targets in 2oo8 for 5o% below 19go levels by 2050, which is insufficient to meet a 20C target. Note — Washington's target is not a science -based target. m While science -based temperature targets are the convention — and should be included in Edmonds'target and goal setting discussion —they do not represent the only form of community climate action goals. A science- v based temperature target can provide an overarching metric that can guide development of other goals, and E especially the rate at which other goals need to be accomplished. Communities commonly set additional or complementary goals for specific mitigation opportunities. For example, Edmonds' existing goal to transition the entire community to t00% Renewable Electricity by 2030 is important and aligned with climate mitigation E goals. The Portland, OR metro region recently set a goal of t00% renewable electricity by 2035, and t00% renewable energy for all energy sources by 2050 (e.g., replacing natural gas, gasoline, diesel, etc.). Another example is setting a goal around a percentage reduction in fossil fuel use, which is being used in Eugene, OR °f and Bend, OR (e.g., a 5o% reduction in fossil fuel use by 2030). Additional goals may be set that are specific to and address other large sources of community emissions. The climate action planning process will highlight y actions that fit Edmonds' unique community context. Ideally each of the actions in Edmonds' Climate Action M Plan will include an action -specific goal/target, be assigned an organizational lead, establish a tracking metric, U c and identify a data stream to measure progress overtime. Q goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page 5 Packet Pg. 268 mood COMPANY T 8.1.b How Urgent is Our Situation and What Can We Expect Moving Forward? Existing international and domestic activities and policies remain inadequate to prevent a 2°C warming, as can be seen in Figure 2. The Paris Climate Accord commitment period ending in 203o aims for no more than a 2°C increase12. The United Nations project annual global emissions to reach 53-55 gigatons COZe in 203o, but in order to meet the 2°C target, emissions have to be at a maximum of 40 gigatons CO2e12. Figure 2 also provides estimated temperature in year 21oo based on various emissions paths. Since global political uncertainty is likely to continue, collective action beyond national plans, such as state and local efforts in the U.S., is essential in order to meet a 2°C or lower increase. 150 0 w 100 ro ti ry Q1 C) 3 0 50 0 0 Associated increase in temperature in 2100: 2000 2050 2100 Figure 2: Climate Interactive estimated increase in temperature forecast based on UN modeling. 4.2°C 17.6°F 3.3T 16.0°F 1.8°C 13.3'F 1.5°C 12.8°F While average global temperature differences may seem small, even slight changes in average temperatures mean large changes in seasonal temperature and subsequently extreme weathers. Edmonds can expect milder, shorter winters and significantly hotter, longer summers13,5. With current policies and activities in place, it is estimated that by year 21oo, average temperatures will have increased by 3.3005. Additionally, Edmonds will have a summer climate similar to Laguna Niguel, CA— an Orange County city southeast of Los Angeles — an increase of 6°C (i10F) if we were to proceed globally as we are now13,5. See Figure 12 United Nations Environment Programme Emissions Gap Report 2018. 13 Climate Central tools: Seasonal Warming Trends Across the US, Summers in 2100. c 0 0 rn m E_ U a goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINA6ILITY WORK Page Packet Pg. 269 �gftq F` T A 3. Table 3 (next page) describes some of the other changes in physical conditions that could result from different levels of temperature rise. I lire in Edmonds, QUA By 2100 summers in EDMONDS, WA } Q66 0 F will I�fl no summers w in CLIMATE Co CENTRAL Figure 3: Summers in 2100, Climate Central tool. LAGUNA NIGUEL, GA 81.4a O F goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Pagel Packet Pg. 270 mood COMPANY Table 3: Differences in Physical Conditions. Differences in Physical ConditionS14 (mainly available for 1.50 and z°C) ft sea level rise loball �5 7- 9 Y ft sea level rise loball �5 9�4- g Y i ft sea level rise loball is 5- g Y r r,. r r Pr, t i Edrr :r i i '.";irn7 � � Par rt L d rJ'7rrna can P xt ri omInn'1; C •'J'nr5ia � � c � � rn 3 Figures 3-5: Differences in sea level rise due to global temperature increases. Note how the sea level creeps up the hillside and gradually covers more of the low-lying areas. Other areas in Edmonds are also affected. Physical Conditions�4 .• Ocean acidity increase g% Ocean acidity increase 24% Frequency of warm extremes over land (PNW) increase 131% Frequency of warm extremes over land (PNW) increase 350% = Extreme heat: 3.4%of global Extreme heat: 37%of global population exposed to severe population exposed to severe heat at least once every 5 years heat at least once every 5 years Population exposed to water scarcity worldwide: 271 million Population exposed to water scarcity worldwide: 388 million 71— Sea -ice -free arctic: at least Sea -ice -free arctic: at least i summer every ioo years io summers every ioo years Species loss: 4% of vertebrates Species loss: 8% of vertebrates lose at least half of their range lose at least half of their range Species loss: 8% of plants lose at least half of their range Species loss: 3.6% of plants lose at least half of their range l Species loss: 6% of insects lose at Species loss: 3.8% of insects lose at least half of their range least half of their range �4 References available from CarbonBrief.org. �5 Climate Central Surging Seas Seeing Choices tool. a goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page Packet Pg. 271 mood COMPANY F` T What Does Daily Life Look Like by 2050? Sample Community Changes — Refer to the Edmonds 2017 Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory for details on Edmonds significant local and imported emissions sources and terminology. Impacted emissions Change to: Through: source local local • No fossil fuel combustion nnNUFLCU imported • Reduced consumption of goods, use of disposables, and local subsequent waste local • Reduced food waste local • Reduction in GHG-intensive imported foods imported . Decreased household local consumption of goods and local energy ALL • Negative emissions actions EB r 11 • i00% renewable electricity and large-scale energy storage • Electrified transport • Purchase of durable goods with a focus on reuse and repair • Reduction of waste in processing and sales (pre -consumer) • Buying just what you need • Composting (post -consumer, to avoid methane production at landfills and as a means of increasing soil carbon storage) • More vegetables, fruits, legumes, grains, and fish • Reduced meat and dairy • Family education • Mass sequestration via forests and technology goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Page Packet Pg. 272 How Much Would It Cost to Offset s00% of Community Emissions? Edmonds' 2017 community emissions were roughly 16q,000 metric tons of greenhouse gases / carbon dioxide equivalent (MT COZe). This estimate includes GHG emissions generated within Edmonds plus the GHG emissions embodied in electricity consumed within Edmonds (using market -based electric accounting; see inventory for discussion) known as a "local" or a "sector -based inventory." This does not include upstream, "imported" emissions from the consumption of food, goods, fuel, and services made outside of Edmonds, which were estimated to be 444,000 MT COze, for a combined total of 613,000 MT COZe. Regulatory -grade offsets in California's Cap -and -Trade market sold in January 2o18 for an average of $15 per MT. Likewise, the Climate Trust produces high -quality, voluntary -market carbon offsets for about $15 per MT. Globally, the average offset price has hovered around $5 per MT for several years. The primary differences in price for carbon offsets depend on the supply relative to demand; "co -benefits" and the appreciation for these by the customer (forestry projects typically command a higher market price than a landfill gas project); and the rigor of the carbon offset verification process (e.g., regulatory market quality versus voluntary market quality). It should be noted to that the cost of carbon offsets is expected to rise if and when carbon markets are established, and the lowest costs offset options are exploitedi6 Unlike the emissions inventory, the purchase of offsets should be based on market -based accounting of electricity emissions. The City of Edmonds and Snohomish PUD are already focused on low -emission electricity. Note, however, that the current Pacific Northwest supply of low -emission electricity is limited — if Edmonds does not reduce demand, other communities may not have access to the same energy contracts. Based on a price of $1.5 per MT and 2017 total community emissions, the annual cost for the community to be carbon neutral is about $526 per household or sq.z million dollars per year for the entire community, if offsets were the only method of reducing community emissions. That said, the community does not need to be carbon neutral next year to meet a science -based target. If offset costs were paired with an assumed reduction pace towards a 1.5°C science -based target, the cost at $15 per MT in 2020 would be $1,195,350 for the entire community (about s68 per household). See Table 4 (next page) for estimated cost scenarios and Table z for reduction rates and reference. Note that these costs are only applicable if Edmonds does not make changes in ways that reduce emissions. 16 California Air Resources Board, January 2017 Proposed Plan, Appendix E. E U Q goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Pageio Packet Pg. 273 mood COMPANY Table 4: Estimated annual cost of offsets for cite -wide emissions in different pricing and target scenarios, using 2o18 dollars. Note: This table based on z00% Offsets, with no behavior or policy changes. Local emissions Local + imported* Local emissions Local + imported* Local emissions Local + imported* 2020 $126,750 $459,750 $253,500 $919,500 $380,250 $1,379,250 2030 $591,500 $2,145,500 $i,i83,000 $4,291,000 $1,774,500 $6,436,500 2050 $845,000 I $3,o65,000 $i,69o,000 1 $6,130,000 $2,535,000 1 $9,195,000 2020 $1o9,850 $398,450 $219,700 $796,9oo $329,550 $1,195,350 2030 $422,500 $1,532,500 $845,000 $3,o65,000 $1,267,500 $4,597,500 2050 2'C target offset costs 2020 $845,000 s5 per $84,500 $3,o65,000 IVIT $3o6,500 $i,69o,000 .. s16g,000 $6,130,000 $613,000 $2,535,000 $253,500 $9,195,000 $9191500 2030 $295,750 $1,072,750 $591,500 $2,145,500 $887,250 $3,218,250 2050 $676,000 $2,452,000 $1,352,000 $4,904,000 $2,028,000 $7,356,000 *Local emissions refer to sector -based emissions; local + imported refer to sector -based plus consumption. Please refer to Edmonds 2017 Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory for details on terminology and accounting. Making the Choice for Edmonds Edmonds' leadership is faced with an important choice about which science -based target to pursue. Essentially the choice between the i°C target, the 1.5°C target and the 20C target is a choice between local and global safety contrasted with the discomfort of taking on the effort at a slower or faster pace. Once the overarching target is embraced, the required pace of emission reductions becomes evident. Once a target is selected, the next phase of the Climate Action Plan process we will examine which actions can get Edmonds to the target in the right timeframe. In the selection and testing of those actions, the chosen actions —for example energy efficiency and decreased food wasting — will require the development of more common tracking metrics such as: the number and percentage of Edmonds buildings that have been weatherized or the total tons of food waste reduced at the point of collection. These actions will need to be tracked over time to show progress against a periodic community carbon footprint. The selection of a science - based target will guide Edmonds on a new path of continued climate action commitment. E U Q goodcompany.com MAKING SUSTAINA6ILITY WORK Pageil Packet Pg. 274 8.1.c RESOLUTION NO. 1389 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMMITTING TO ACHIEVE OR EXCEED AT THE LOCAL LEVEL THE GOALS ESTABLISHED IN THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD WHEREAS, climate change poses a grave threat to the health and well-being of this and future generations in Edmonds and beyond; and WHEREAS, according to the World Health Organization, human -caused climate change is already killing some 150,000 people every year around the world; and WHEREAS, people of color, immigrants, refugees, economically disadvantaged residents, older people and children, people who are homeless, and people with existing mental or health conditions will experience climate change disproportionately; and WHEREAS, the 2015 EPA report, Climate Change in the United States; Benefits of Global Action, states that global action on climate change would prevent nearly 70,000 premature American deaths annually by the end of the century while sparing the country hundreds of billions of dollars in economic losses; and WHEREAS, Washington State has already experienced long- term warming, more frequent nighttime heat waves, sea level rising along most of Washington's coast, increased coastal ocean acidity, decline in glacial area and spring snowpack and the State Department of Ecology has reported that, "human caused climate change poses an immediate and urgent threat"; and WHEREAS, economists have concluded that Washington's families and businesses are likely to incur billions of dollars of annual economic costs if Washington state and other states and nations fail to drive reductions in climate -changing greenhouse gas pollution. These economics impacts include increased energy costs, coastal and storm damage, reduced food production, increased wildland fire costs, and increased public health costs; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the immediate need to take strong and proactive action to protect our environment, the City of Edmonds in 2006 established the Climate Protection Committee with a core mission to: 1. Encourage Edmonds citizens to be a part of the solution 2. Encourage City staff and citizens to conserve current resources 3. Work with the City Council to implement ideas to preserve and enhance our environment 4. Effectively address the future impacts of climate change Packet Pg. 275 8.1.c WHEREAS, the Climate Protection Committee has established key environmental strategies to: 1) Reduce fossil fuels with renewable energy resources for energy supplied to buildings, 2) Improve energy efficiency of and within buildings and 3) Require the design and construction of new and remodeled commercial buildings to meet green building standards; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, Mayor Dave Earling signed the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and stated "In light of the [President's] decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord, I feel it important for our city to emphasize our local commitment to, and continued effort to improve our environment"; and WHEREAS, as a signatory of the Safe Energy Leadership Alliance ("SELA"), Edmonds has committed itself to being a regional and national leader in addressing the adverse impacts of climate change driven by the burning of fossil fuels; and enacted bold policies and programs to reduce emissions from its transportation, building energy, and waste sectors and reduced emissions while its population has grown; and WHEREAS, the Paris Agreement resulted in a commitment from almost every nation to take action and enact programs to limit global temperature increase to less than 2 degrees Celsius, with an expectation that this goal would be reduced to 1.5 degrees in the future; and WHEREAS, the State of Washington has mandated statewide reduction of GHG emissions to 50% below 1990 levels by 2050; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. H.29 on September 18, 2006 adopting the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement as amended by the 73rd Annual U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1129 also requested semi-annual updates to City Council regarding the progress of the City in implementing the following program milestones: 1) Conduct a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and forecast for the City, 2) Establish a greenhouse gas emission target (GHG), 3) Develop an action plan to meet the local greenhouse emissions target, 4) Im.plement the action plan and 5) periodically review progress and update the plan; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2010 the City of Edmonds completed a Climate Change Action Plan and within the plan it reported Edmonds buildings account for approximately one- third of Edmond's GHG emissions for lighting, heating, cooling, and cooking; and WHEREAS, the Climate Change Action plan states replacing fossil fuel -derived energy with renewable energy sources for both city owned buildings and throughout our community is critical to achieving the greenhouse gas emission reduction goals set forth in the City's Climate Action Plan and the Compact of Mayors, to which the City is a signatory; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that energy consumers and the utilities serving them take early action to reduce carbon emissions given the accelerating rate climate change the planet is Packet Pg. 276 8.1.c experiencing, and shifting to 100% of electricity from renewable sources by 2025 is within reach; and WHEREAS, "renewable energy" includes energy derived from hydrogen, wind power sited in ecologically responsible ways, solar, existing and low -impact hydroelectric, geothermal, biogas (including biogas produced from biomass), and ocean/wave technology sources. "Renewable energy" specifically excludes energy derived from fossil fuels, nuclear, biomass feedstocks sourced from state and federal lands, hydrogen produced from fossil fuels, and incineration of .municipal and medical waste; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council has demonstrated its commitment to environmental stewardship and the health and safety of Edmonds residents by numerous other actions, including passing Resolution 1362 on June 28, 2016 stating its opposition to the transport of crude oil by rail; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, THAT: Section 1: City Council fully supports Mayor Dave Earling's June 6, 2017 endorsement of the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda. Section 2: City Council rededicates itself to partnering with the City administration and Edmonds citizens to identify the benefits and costs of adopting policies and programs that promote the long-term goal of greenhouse gas emissions reduction while maximizing economic and social benefits of such action. Section 3: The Planning Department and the Climate Protection Committee will report annually to the City Council our current municipal and community -wide GHG inventory starting in 2018. Section The Planning Department and the Climate Protection Committee will establish and recommend to City Council a GHG emissions reduction target goal for both the near terns and long tern by July 1, 2018. Section 5: The Planning Department and the Climate Protection Committee will update our City's Climate Change Action Plan and review the specific strategies for meeting the emissions reduction target as well as tying mitigation with adaptation measures where possible. Section 6. The City establishes the following renewable energy goals for both municipal facilities and for the City at large: 100% renewable energy for municipal facilities by 2019; and, ii. 100% renewable energy for the City's community electricity supply by 2025. Section 7. By November 1, 2018, the Planning Department and the Climate Protection Committee will develop a work plan, including options, methods and financial resources needed and an associated timeline and milestones to achieve these renewable energy goals. Packet Pg. 277 8.1.c RESOLVED this 27t' day of June, 2017. APPROVED: i TOM M F.SAROS; COUNCIL PRFFSTI)ENT ATTESTIAU'I'I ;N'I'ICATED: tl-rY CLERK, SC ' PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: June 28, 2017 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: June 27, 2017 RESOLUTION NO. 1389 4 Packet Pg. 278 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Ordinance amending the Fireworks Code Staff Lead: Mayor Mike Nelson Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Most of the relevant fireworks code, chapter 5.27 ECC, has not been updated since the 1990s. This year, during the Fourth of July celebration, it became apparent that the City may need to strengthen the incentives to comply with the code. At the July 28th City Council meeting an updated fireworks ordinance was introduced and discussed. Assistant Fire Chief Kevin Zweber, fire marshal for South County Fire (SCF), spoke in support of the proposed code amendment. He stated that the use of personal fireworks has consequences that are both predictable and preventable. He described firework impacts to communities including the following: Fireworks put people, property and the environment at risk every 4th of July and can result in numerous things including property loss with the potential of serious economic impacts. Since 2005 SCF has had more than $3.5 million in property loss related to fireworks. This past 4th of July, SCF responded to a fireworks incident where a citizen lost a portion of their hand while trying to throw a mortar. Deaths related to fireworks occurred in both Marysville and Mt. Vernon this year. The danger, stress and anxiety to pets and wildlife are widespread, including an increase in lost dogs and cats in the days before, during, and after fireworks use. As the City's Fire Department, SCF is committed to community risk reduction. This means identifying risks within the community and developing effective strategies to mitigate risks. The City's fireworks ban is one of those risk reduction strategies, but bans have shown to be only partially effective in reducing property loss and injuries and it is clear fireworks bans have not been completely effective in changing behaviors. SCF supports the proposed code amendment and is committed to working together on code enforcement, public information and community outreach to educate the communities they serve about the risk of fireworks, fireworks bans, and attending professional community fireworks displays as a better alternative to using personal fireworks. See attached Edmonds Fireworks Memo with comments from SCF Chief Thad Hovis. Staff Recommendation Continued discussion and action regarding the proposed Ordinance. Packet Pg. 279 8.2 Narrative The City's fireworks code has not been updated in many years. At the July 28t" Council meeting, Council discussed various steps to take when people violate the ordinance. The proposed fireworks code has been since updated. The most significant change in this ordinance is updating the penalties for violating the City's fireworks code. A first offense will result in a $250 non -traffic infraction. A second offense within 5 years will increase the penalty to a misdemeanor as allowed by state law. Various state codes are being adopted by reference for the purpose of allowing for the possibility of enforcement of those codes in the Edmonds Municipal Court. Various definitions are updated to conform to state law. The fee for a public display permit is increased from $30 to $500. The $500 is an estimate of the funds needed to cover all legitimate costs for all display permits, licenses, and authorizations from application to and through processing, issuance, and inspection. The state limits the City's authority to set this fee no higher than its actual costs, but in no case higher than $5,000. Attachments: 2020-08-13 fireworks ordinance Edmonds Fireworks Memo Packet Pg. 280 8.2.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATING AND OTHERWISE UPDATING THE CITY'S FIREWORKS CODE. WHEREAS, the state fireworks law is set forth in chapter 70.77 RCW; and WHEREAS, the City's fireworks regulations are codified in chapter 5.27 ECC; and WHEREAS, the penalty for violating the City's fireworks regulation has not been updated since 1995; and WHEREAS, recent experience during the Fourth of July holiday of 2020 suggests that the City may need to create stronger incentives to comply with the City's fireworks code; and WHEREAS, other aspects of the City's fireworks regulations need to be updated; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 5.27.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Definitions," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike - The definitions of Chapter 70.77 RCW as now stated or hereafter amended shall govern the construction of this chapter, when applicable. RCW 70.77.120 through and including RCW 70.77.2412-3-0 as now stated or hereafter amended are adopted by this reference and a copy or the same shall be kept on file in the office of the city clerk for public use and inspection. In addition, the following term(s) are defined: A. "Dangerous fireworks" means any firework not defined as a "common firework" under the provisions of RCW 70.77.136. B. The "local fire official" for the purposes of chapter 70.77 RCW shall be the City's fire marshal. Packet Pg. 281 8.2.a Section 2. Section 5.27.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Sale, possession, use and discharge of fireworks unlawful," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike dffe g ): A. It is unlawful for any person to sell, possess, use, transfer, discharge, ignite or explode any fireworks within the city; provided that this prohibition shall not apply to the following activities, when authorized by a state license and city permit: and 1.A-. Duly authorized public displays, as provided in RCW 70.77.260; 2.B-. Duly authorized use by religious organizations or private organizations or persons for religious or other specific purposes on an approved date and in an approved location, as provided in RCW 70.77.311(2). B. RCW 70.77.485, entitled "Unlawful possession of fireworks —Penalties," RCW 70.77.540, entitled "Penalty," RCW 70.77.515, entitled "Unlawful sales or transfers of consumer fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.488, entitled "Unlawful discharge or use of fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.517, entitled "Unlawful transportation of fireworks —Penalty," RCW 70.77.520, entitled "Unlawful to permit fire nuisance where fireworks kept —Penalty," and RCW 70.77.510 entitled "Unlawful sales or transfers of display fireworks —Penalty," collectively, as now stated or hereafter amended, are adopted by this reference and a copy or the same shall be kept on file in the office of the citv clerk for public use and inspection. Section 3. Section 5.27.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Permit fees," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-rike- The fee for a "public display permit" for public display of fireworks shall be $30.00 $500.00 payable in advance. In addition, in the event that the location specified in Packet Pg. 282 8.2.a the permit has unusual parameters, limitations or risks requiring inspection over and above that anticipated in the establishment of this fee (that is in excess of one hour), a charge for inspection shall be paid by the applicant equal to the actual cost of providing the inspection. See ECDC 19.75.065. Section 4. Section 5.27.180 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Enforcement," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike thfet+gh): The police chief, fire marshal ehie€, or their designees, are }s authorized to enforce all provisions of this chapter and, in addition to criminal sanctions or civil remedies, he may revoke any permit issued pursuant to this chapter upon any failure or refusal of the permittee to comply with the orders and directives of the police chief, fire marshal, chief or their designees;i and/or to eemp!y 2) with any provisions of this chapter or the requirements of the community development code relating to temporary structures. Section 5. Section 5.27.210 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Penalty and violations," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in A. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this section, violations of this chapter shall be punished as a non -traffic infraction, punishable by a fine of two -hundred fifty dollars. All public safety and education assessments (PSEA,) required by state law shall be added to the base fine described herein. Remission of PSEA money shall be as set forth in state law and cannot be suspended or waived. The municipal court shall have discretion to assess additional penalties for failure to pay or respond to notices of infraction issued under this section as otherwise allowed by law. B. Any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter which does not also constitute a violation of state law for the second time within five years, and any subsequent violations within five years, shall be guilty of a eivil in f . et misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than Packet Pg. 283 8.2.a $1,000 and/or jail not to exceed 90 das; a fine of $50.n�rthe first offense, $100 00 f the seeend offense, $150.00 for- the third offense and $200.00 for- eaeh offense with three . Any violation of this chapter which also constitutes a violation of state law shall be punishable under state law penalties. In addition, any fireworks that are involved in the violation may be confiscated. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 284 8.2.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATING AND OTHERWISE UPDATING THE CITY' S FIREWORKS CODE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2020. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 5 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 285 8.2.b DATE: July 31, 2020 TO: City of Edmonds Mayor and Council FROM: Thad Hovis, Interim Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fireworks Memo Mayor and Council, Thank you for giving South County Fire the opportunity at your last meeting to present information on incidents surrounding the use of personal fireworks. I realize that due to the length of that meeting a few agenda items were postponed and that fireworks would be discussed at your next meeting, so I wanted to take this opportunity to share my thoughts. Fireworks have a long history in our local communities. My personal history includes riding my bike on the 4t" of July from my house off of Main Street to buy fireworks at the stand at the Tradewell Grocery store parking lot at 5 Corners. In 1995, when I started in the fire service here as a volunteer at the Edmonds Fire Department, banning fireworks was a newer concept, but also a necessary decision made to address the effects that fireworks were clearly having on life, property and the environment within the city. Over the years the neighboring cities of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Brier, as well as the Town of Woodway have also banned fireworks for the same reasons. With each ban the fire department has seen reduced personal fireworks use; and in -turn reduced injuries and property loss. Beginning next year, based on a Snohomish County Council Advisory vote in 2019, a ban on the discharge of fireworks will also be in effect within our agency's unincorporated service area. Despite these bans and concerted efforts to continually educate the public about the dangers of fireworks, there are still many individuals who choose to personally discharge fireworks. That was very evident again early this month, not just on the 4th of July, but for days before and after. Specifically, on July 4, 2020 our incident volume was over 60% greater than our typical daily average. From South County Fire's perspective, any ordinance update that widens the ability to enforce, and increase the consequences when the ban is violated, should have a positive impact to continue to reduce the unlawful discharge of fireworks in future years and we sincerely appreciate the Council's willingness to reexamine this public safety topic. 12425 Meridian Ave S Page 1 of 1 Everett, WA 98208 425.551.1200 Packet Pg. 286 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Review of Council Code of Conduct Staff Lead: Council/Laura Johnson Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History In December 2013, the Council passed Resolution No. 1306 adopting a new Code of Conduct and in June 2015, the Council approved a new Code of Ethics. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Councilmember Laura Johnson has revised the Code of Conduct for the Edmonds City Council to include language that addresses appropriate communications between Council to staff, the general public, and to fellow Councilmembers; the Council is asked to review these updates. The Council began review of the updated Code of Conduct on 8/11 and will continue review and take possible action at this Council meeting. Attachments: Updated Code of Conduct 2020 DRAFT Resolution 1306 Code of Conduct CODE —OF —ETHICS 06-02-2015 Packet Pg. 287 8.3.a Updated Code of Conduct 2020 - DRAFT Section 6. Council Conduct. Councilmembers should seek to improve the quality of public service and ensure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective, open, and equitable operation. To this end, the following Code of Conduct for members of the Edmonds City Council is established: 6.1 Conduct during Public Meetings A. Councilmembers have a public stage to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground, demonstrate effective problem -solving approaches, and seek solutions that benefit the community as a whole. B. Councilmembers will practice civility and decorum in discussions and debates. Disagreements should focus on vision, policies, and their implementation. C. Ensuring the public feels welcome is a vital part of the democratic process. No signs of partiality, prejudice, or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual Councilmembers toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony. D. Councilmembers shall prepare themselves for public issues and listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body during the meeting. Council discussions are open and transparent and diverse ideas and opinions are welcome. E. Whenever possible, Councilmembers shall seek to minimize surprises at public meetings including vetting of amendments or new ideas prior to introduction and/or discussion and should seek to provide key questions to staff ahead of public discussions. F. While the Council is in session, Councilmembers shall neither, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council, nor disrupt any member while speaking nor refuse to obey the orders of the Council or the Mayor, except as otherwise provided in these Rules. G. If a member is offended by the remarks of another member, the offended member should make note of the words used and call for a "point of personal privilege." The meeting chair will maintain control of this discussion and if deemed necessary, ask the offending member to restate their remarks. H. It is important that each Councilmember is treated equally by their Council peers. All members are duly elected or appointed and should be afforded mutual respect. With the exception of the Council President's agenda -setting power, no member has or shall be afforded extraordinary powers beyond those of other members. 6.2 Conduct with City Staff Packet Pg. 288 8.3.a A. Councilmembers shall treat all staff as professionals with clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each person. B. As feasible, Council Members will work with Department Directors or designees before meetings to obtain the information needed to participate in discussions and debates and to make decisions. C. City Council policy is implemented through dedicated and professional staff. To support effective relationships, it is important that roles are clearly recognized. Councilmembers shall avoid intrusion into areas that are the responsibility of staff and recognize that it is not the role of the Council or its members to administer City business. D. Councilmembers may ask Department Directors or designee about the status of work items or request information. Except through their participation on Council, they shall not expressly or implicitly give orders or direction, attempt to influence the decisions or recommendations of staff members, or otherwise be involved in administrative functions. E Councilmember communications with City Staff shall be limited to normal City business hours, except in cases of emergency or a pre -agreed upon event or meeting held outside of normal City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of normal business hours should be expected no earlier than the next business day. F. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of a City employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager. Comments about staff performance should only be made to the Mayor through appropriate correspondence. 6.3 Conduct with Council Legislative/Administrative Assistant A. Councilmembers shall treat the Legislative/Administrative Assistant as a professional with clear, honest communication that respects abilities, experience, and individual dignity. Additionally, Councilmembers are responsible for ensuring a supportive and positive work environment for the Legislative/Administrative Assistant. B. Given the need for shared coordination, Councilmembers shall not request the Council Legislative Assistant to initiate any significant project or study, outside of limited research, without the consent of the Council President. The Legislative/Administrative Assistant's time will be divided equally among the seven Councilmembers. D. Councilmember communications with the Legislative/Administrative Assistant shall be limited to normal City business hours, except in cases of emergency or a pre -agreed upon event or meeting held outside of normal City business hours. Responses to questions posed outside of normal business hours should be expected no earlier than the next business day. E. Councilmembers shall never express concerns about the performance of the Legislative/Administrative Assistant in public or to the Legislative Assistant directly. Comments about performance should only be made to the Council President through appropriate correspondence. Packet Pg. 289 8.3.a 6.4 Conduct with Boards, Committees, Commissions, and Outside Agencies A. The City maintains several boards and commissions as a means of encouraging and gathering community input. Citizens who serve on boards and commissions become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council or Mayor. They are a valuable resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. B. Councilmembers are appointed as non -voting members to serve as the primary two-way communication liaison between the Council and boards, commissions, and committees. Councilmembers are not to direct the activities or work of the board, commission, or committee C. Councilmembers may attend any board or commission meeting to which they are not appointed but shall do so as a member of the public. Personal comments or positions, if given, will be identified as such and shall not be represented as the position of the City or Council. D. Councilmembers shall not contact a board or commission member to lobby on behalf of an individual, business, or organization. It is acceptable for Councilmembers to contact the board, committee, or commission members in order to clarify or contextualize a position taken by the body. When making contact the relevant Council liaison should be included in such communication. E. When attending a non -city sponsored event, meeting, conference, or other activity, a Councilmember may be authorized to represent the Council only upon a majority vote of the Council. Likewise, a Councilmember may be authorized to represent the City only upon the express permission of the Mayor. 6.5 Conduct via Technologic Communication A. Technology allows words written or said to be distributed far and wide. Written notes, voicemail messages, texts, and email are public records and should be treated as such. 6.6 Compliance and Enforcement A. The integrity of individual councilmembers reflects, both positively and negatively, on the overall public perception of the ethical behavior of the entire Council and City. Councilmembers themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that conduct standards are understood and met and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of its government. B. The Council has a responsibility to intervene when actions of a member or members appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when a violation is brought to their attention. The City Council, by majority vote, may impose sanctions on members whose conduct does not comply with these standards. Sanctions may include any or all of the following: Packet Pg. 290 8.3.a 1. Official verbal reprimand in an open meeting. 2. Formal public letter of censure by a majority vote of the council. 3. Loss of committee or external appointment assignment(s). Packet Pg. 291 8.3.b RESOLUTION NO: 1306 A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS, AND ALL MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, OR WORK GROUPS. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that City business should be conducted publicly, in an atmosphere of respect and civility, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the following Code of Conduct is adopted and shall apply to the Mayor, City Councilmembers, and members of all City Boards, Commissions, or work groups. In the course of their duties, all group leaders will: 1) provide all members a fair opportunity to participate, 2) not permit any member to dominate proceedings or intimidate other members, and 3) not permit any disrespectful behavior toward participants. In the course of their duties, all participants, including leaders, will: 1) respect the individual talents and contributions of others, 2) avoid offensive comments and behavior, 3) avoid intimidating comments and behavior, 4) listen courteously and attentively, 5) conduct public business in an open and transparent manner, 6) assist leaders in ensuring fair treatment of all members, and 7) assist leaders in controlling disrespectful or intimidating behavior. When speaking officially, all leaders and members will respectfully convey the position of their group. When speaking personally, all leaders and members will disclose that their comments are their own, and not made as a representative of their group. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted this 10th of December, 2013. ATTESTI NTICA CITY K, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: December 6, 2013 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL December 10, 2013 RESOLUTION NO: 1306 Packet Pg. 292 8.3.c CODE OF ETHICS The purpose of the Edmonds Code of Ethics is to strengthen the quality of government through ethical principles which shall govern the conduct of elected officials and appointed citizen volunteers serving in an official capacity (i.e. Boards and Commissions). We shall: • Be dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government. • Affirm the dignity and worth of the services rendered by government and maintain a sense of social responsibility. • Be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all public and personal relationships. • Recognize that the chief function of local government at all times is to serve the best interest of all the people. • Keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage communications between the citizens and all municipal officers. Emphasize friendly and courteous service to the public and each other; seek to improve the quality of public service, and confidence of citizens. • Seek no favor; do not personally benefit or profit by confidential information or by misuse of public resources. • Conduct business of the city in a manner which is not only fair in fact, but also in appearance. Approved by the Edmonds City Council on 06-02-2015. Packet Pg. 293