Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2020-09-01 City Council - Full Agenda-2653
o Agenda Edmonds City Council V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEPTEMBER 1, 2020, 7:00 PM CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING MAY CONNECT VIA ZOOM AT ANY POINT BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PERIOD. CITIZENS WILL SIT IN A VIRTUAL WAITING ROOM UNTIL THEIR TURN TO SPEAK. WHEN THE CITIZEN ENTERS THE LIVE COUNCIL MEETING, THEIR TIME WILL BEGIN. THE CLERK WILL BE THE TIME KEEPER AND PROVIDE A 30-SECOND WARNING AND A FINAL WARNING WHEN THEIR TIME IS UP. THE CITIZEN WILL BE REMOVED AND THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOWED IN. CITIZENS MAY CONNECT WITH A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE AT: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/S/4257752525 OR JOIN THE MEETING BY PHONE AT: 888 475 4499 (TOLL FREE) OR 877 853 5257 (TOLL FREE) MEETING ID 425 775 2525 CITIZENS NOT WISHING TO PARTICIPATE IN AUDIENCE COMMENTS MAY CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE LIVESTREAM ON THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, CABLE TV, OR TELEPHONE BY CALLING (712) 775-7270, ACCESS CODE 583224. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. PRESENTATIONS Proclamation on Suicide Prevention Month (5 min) Snohomish Health District Suicide Prevention Report (20 min) Edmonds City Council Agenda September 1, 2020 Page 1 3. Tree Board Report (20 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 25, 2020 2. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 3. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Eric Messenger ($4,322.16) 4. Compensation for Legislative/Executive Assistant to Council 8. PUBLIC HEARING (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525) 1. Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing (25 min) 9. ACTION ITEMS 1. Set Public Hearing for 184th Street SW Street Vacation (15 min) 2. Learning Enhancement & Activity Program (LEAP) (20 min) 10. STUDY ITEM 1. Tree Regulations Code Process Update (10 min) 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda September 1, 2020 Page 2 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Proclamation on Suicide Prevention Month Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History September is Suicide Prevention Month and the City of Edmonds and its local partners are raising awareness and fostering discussions through outreach and programs highlighting free, anonymous resources available in our community. For more information on these programs, please visit: WeCare.edmondswa.gov Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Edmonds Mayor and City Council will proclaim September as Suicide Prevention Month. Attachments: Proclamation - NSPM 2020 Suicide Prevention Proclamation - Multilingual Packet Pg. 3 lJr1arfamattan O City of Edmonds i Office of the Mayor National Suicide Prevention Month Whereas; September is known as "National Suicide Prevention Month," and September 8-14 as "National Suicide Prevention Week; and Whereas; suicidal thoughts can affect anyone regardless of age, gender, race, orientation, income level, religion, or background; and according to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), Suicide is the loth leading cause of death among adults, and the 2"d leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 10 and 34 in the United States; and Whereas; more than 48,000 people died by suicide across the United States in 2018, with an average of 132 suicides daily, which includes active military and veterans accounting for 13.5% of all suicides nationally; and Whereas; Edmonds-Woodway loth and 12th grade High School students reported a concerning number of attempted suicides and those considering attempting suicide in the 2018 Washington State Healthy Youth Survey; and Whereas; residents age 65 and older comprise about 13% of the U.S. population but account for over 18% of all suicides, with the most common cause for elderly suicide, as for all suicides, is untreated depression; and Whereas; each and every suicide directly impacts a minimum of 100 individuals, including family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, health care professionals and community members; and Whereas; the vast majority of people who struggle with difficult circumstances, emotional and physical pain do not go on to die by suicide and that sharing these stories of hope and recovery can strengthen our community; and Whereas; Edmonds, Washington is no different than any other community across the country, and chooses to publicly place our full support behind local educators, mental health professionals, athletic coaches, the faith community, law enforcement officers, and parents as partners in supporting our community and simply being available to talk openly and listen without judgement to one another; and 8C)0 Packet Pg. 4 5.1.a Whereas; every member of our community should understand that throughout life's struggles we all need the occasional reminder that we are all fighting our own battles; and Whereas; we encourage all residents to take the time to reflect on their own wellbeing as well as to check in with their family, friends, and neighbors on a regular basis and to honestly communicate their appreciation for their existence by any gesture they deem appropriate. A simple phone call, text message, note, handshake, or hug, can go a long way towards helping someone realize that they matter and help them overcome a potential suicidal crisis. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Edmonds Mayor and City Council do hereby proclaim the month of September 2020 as Suicide Prevention Month in the City of Edmonds. Dated this 1st day of September, 2020. Michael Nelson, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, CityCpj hcil ({resident We can all help prevent suicide; the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline provides 241-1 free and confidential support for people in distress, prevention and crisis resources for you or your loved ones. Pease call 1-800-2 73- TALK (8255) or visit suicidepreventionlifeline. org 0 CITY OF EOMONDSO I Packet Pg. 5 5.1.b SUICIDE PREVENTION PROCLAMATION SPANISH LANGUAGE VERSION Todos podemos ayudar a prevenir el suicidio. La linea de atencion "National Suicide Prevention Lifeline" proporciona apoyo confidencial y gratuito las 24 horas, los 7 dias de la semana a las personas con angustia y proporciona tambien recursos para crisis y prevencion a Usted y sus seres queridos. Llame por favor al 1-800-273-TALK (8255) o visite suicidepreventionlifeline.org Considerando que septiembre se conoce como "Mes nacional de prevencion del suicidio," y los dias 8-14 de septiembre se conocen como "Semana nacional de prevencion del suicidio"; y Considerando que los pensamientos suicidas pueden afectar a cualquier persona, sin importar su edad, genero, raza, orientacion, ingresos, religion o herencia; y segun la Fundacion Americana para la Prevencion del Suicidio (AFSP), el suicidio es la decima causa de muerte entre los adultos, y la segunda causa de muerte entre los individuos entre los 10 y 34 anos en los Estados Unidos, y Considerando que mas de 48,000 personas murieron por suicidio en los Estados Unidos en 2018, con un promedio de 132 suicidios al dia, to que incluye a los militares activos y los veteranos que representan un 13.5% de todos los suicidios en la nacion, y Considerando que estudiantes de los grados 10 y 12 en Edmonds-Woodway High School exhibieron una cantidad preocupante de intentos de suicidio y consideracion de intentar el suicidio, segun una encuesta estudiantil del Estado de Washington, y Considerando que los residentes de 65 anos o mas de edad constituyen aproximadamente 13% de la poblacion de los EEUU pero cometen mas de 18% de todos los suicidios, siendo la depresion la causa principal para los ancianos, al igual que para toda la poblacion, y Considerando que cada suicidio impacta directamente a un minimo de 100 individuos, inclusive a familiares, amigos, colegas del trabajo, vecinos, profesionales de atencion medica y miembros de la comunidad, y Considerando que la gran mayoria de las personas que luchan con circunstancias dificiles y dolor fisico o emocional no pasan a suicidarse y que compartir estas historias de esperanza y recuperacion puede reforzar nuestra comunidad, y Considerando que Edmonds, Washington no es diferente de ninguna otra comunidad del pals y elige apoyar de manera publica a nuestros educadores, profesionales de salud mental, entrenadores atleticos, la comunidad de fe, los agentes de cuerpos policiales, y los padres como companeros en apoyar a nuestra comunidad al solo estar disponibles para charlar de forma abierta y escuchar sin juicios a los otros, y Packet Pg. 6 5.1.b Considerando que cada miembro de nuestra comunidad deberia entender que a traves de los desafios de la vida todos necesitamos uno que otro recordatorio que todos nosotros tenemos nuestras batallas, y Considerando que alentamos a todos los residentes a tomar el tiempo para reflexionar sobre su bienestar, al igual que contactar con sus familiares, amigos y vecinos a base regular y comunicar honestamente y con cualquier gesto que vean apropiado su aprecio por su mera existencia. El sencillo acto de una Ilamada, mensaje de texto, nota, apreton de manos, o abrazo puede ayudar bastante para conseguir que alguien se de cuenta que importa y para ayudarle a sobrepasar una potencial crisis suicida. Asi por to tanto se resuelve que el Alcalde y Consejo Municipal de Edmonds proclama por la presente que el mes de septiembre 2020 sera Mes para la Prevencion del Suicidio en la ciudad de Edmonds. Fechado este dia 1 de septiembre de 2020 Packet Pg. 7 5.1.b RUSSIAN LANGUAGE VERSION Ka)Kdbiu u3 Hac mo)Kem oKa3amb nomou,4b e npedynpe)(deHuu caMoy6uucme. HauuoHanbHaA aopRLiaAnuHUR no npedynpe)(deHufo camoy6uucme npedocmaenRem Kpy2nOCym04HyF0, 6ecnnamHpo u KOHCpudeHquanbHyio noddep)KKy modAM, ucnb1mb/eafou.4um mpydHOcmu, a maK)Ke npoCbunaKmu4ecKue U KpU3UCHb/e pecypcb/ dnA eac unu eawux 6nu3Kux. 06paL 4aumecb no HoMepy 1-800-273-TALK (8255) unu 3a6dume Ha caum suicidepreventionlifeline.org YlAWTblBaA, 4TO CeHTA6pb W3BeCTeH KaK ,HaL�WOHanbHU6 Mecgq npegOTBpaLLpHWq CaMOy6wOUB», a nepwog C 8 n0 14 ceHTA6PA — KaK ,HagWOHanbHaq HegenA npe,gOTBpau�eHMq caMoy6wOUB»; W YlAWTblBaA, 4TO MbICnVI O CaMoy6wOCTBe MOFyT 3aTpaFWBaTb nF06OFO HenOBeKa He3aBHCHMO OT B03paCTa, FeHgepa, pacbl, opmeHTagmm, ypOBHq goxoga, penWFWW mFim npomcxo>KgeHMA, a TaK>Ke TO, 4TO COFnaCHo AMepHKaHCKOMy C�OHgy npegOTBpameHVIA CaMOy6mOCTB (AFSP) B COegHHeHHbIX WTaTaX CaMoy6mOCTBa — 3TO 1 O-A npmLiMHa CMepTHOCTVI cpegH B3pOCnblX w 2-A npMLlWHa CMepTHOCTH cpegm JlWq B B03paCTe OT 1 O ,g0 34 neT; W YHWTbIBaA, HTO B 2018 Fogy B COegWHeHHbIX WTaTaX B pe3ynbTaTe CaMoy6wOCTB nOFW6no 60nee 48 000 HenOBeK — B CpegHeM 132 CaMOy6m6CTBa B geHb, BKnK)4aA ge0CTBYMLL wX BOeHHOCnyw&L�wx W BeTepaHOB, HTO COCTaBnAeT 13,5 % OT 06LLAeFO 4V1Cna CaMoy6wOCTB B CTpaHe; m YLIMTblBaA, LITO B XOge npOBegeHHoFO B 2018 Fogy B WTaTe BaLuWHFTOH Onpoca 3,gopOBblX y4aL4mxcA, y4a 4weCA 10 w 12 KnaCCOB CpegHeO WKOnbl 3,gMOHgc-BygBeO C006L4mnm o TpeBO>KaL4eM KOnV14eCTBe nonblTOK CaMOy6m0CTBa w pa3MblWneHHO o CaMoy6w0CTBe; w YLIMTblBaA, LITO >KHTenM B B03paCTe 65 neT M CTapLue COCTaBnAK)T OKOnO 1 3% HaceneHmq CWA, HO Ha Hwx npi4xogWTCA 6onee 18 % BCeX CaMoy6m6CTB, W TO, 4To Ham6onee pacnpOCTpaHeHHo6 npwHWHO6 CaMoy6w0CTB B no>KV1noM B03paCTe, KaK w Bcex caMoy6m6CTB, ABngeTCA npOi4FHOpi4pOBaHHaq genpecci4q; Vl YlAWTblBaA, 4TO Ka>K,goe CaMoy6wOCTBO Henocpe,gCTBeHHO 3aTpaFMBaeT KaK MWHWMyM 100 4enOBeK, BKnFo4aA CeMb[O, gpy3eO, KOnneF no pa60Te, cocegeO, MegmgHHCKHX pa60THWKOB m 4neHOB o6L4WHbl; W YLIMTblBaA, LITO nOgaBnAK)L4ee 60nbLUHHCTBO FiiogeO, KOTOpble CTanKMBa[OTCA C Tpy,gHOCTAMH, 3MOLtWOHanbHO0 W C�WWLieCKOVI 60nb10, He ymmpa[OT B pe3ynbTaTe CaMOy6wOCTBa, W TO 4TO pacnpOCTpaHeHwe TaKL4X HCTOPHO O Hage>Kge W Bbl3,gOpOBneHMM Mo>KeT yKpeni4Tb Hatay 06LL WHY; W YlAWTblBaA, 4TO 3AMOHAC, WTaT BaLUWHFTOH, Hw AeM He OTnV14aeTCA OT nK)6oO APyFOO 06UL Mbl B CTpaHe, w npMHWmaeT peWeHwe ny6nV14HO 3aABHTb o nOf1HoO no,g,gep>KKe McCTHblx negaFOFOB, CneL�wajiWCTOB B o6naCTm ncmxw AeCKOFO 3,gopOBbA, CnOPTWBHbIX TpeHepOB, penWF1403HblX 06LL HH, COTpygHWKOB npaBOOXpaHHTenbHblX OpfaHOB w pO,gWTene0 B Ka4eCTBe napTHepOB HaLueO o6L4WHbl, BCeFga FOTOBblX FOBOPHTb OTKpblTO W CnywaTb ,gpyF ,gpyra 6e3 ocy>KgeHHq; W Packet Pg. 8 5.1.b YlAWTblBaA, 4TO Ka>K,gblO 4JleH HaweO 06LLAMHbl ,gOJI>KeH nOHVIMaTb, 4TO HeCMOTpA Ha >KM3HeHHble CJ1O>KHOCTVI HaM BCeM He06XO,gmMO BpeMA OT BpeMeHVI HanoMVIHaTb O TOM, HTO Ka>K,gblO W3 Hac 60peTCA CO CBOVIMVI np06JleMamm; Vl YLIMTblBaA, LITO MbI npM3blBaeM BCeX >KMTeJ1e0 ygejiMTb BpeMA Vl nopa3MbILLJJ1ATb 0 C06CTBeHHOM 611aronoFiyLimm, a TaK>Ke peryflApHO BCTpe4aTbCA CO CBOeO CeMbeO, ,gpy3bAMH Vl COCegAMVI Vl 4eCTHO BbICKa3blBaTb npH3HaTeJIbHOCTb 3a CBOe CyLLAeCTBOBaHVIe .mo6blM >KeCTOM, KOTOpbIVI OHM COLITyT yMeCTHbIM. 06bIKHOBeHHblo Tenec�OHHblo 3BOHOK, TeKCTOBOe C0061JAeHVIe, 3anMCKa, pyKono>KaTVIe NnN 06bATVle MOryT nOMO4b KOMy-TO OCO3HaTb, HTO OH gJ1A KOFO-TO Ba>KeH, w cn0006CTBOBaTb npeOgOJleHwF0 nOTeH4MaJlbHOFO Cyw4L4,gaJlbHOFO KpV13Vca. TO C yHeTOM BbIWeM3J10>KeHHOFo nOCTaHOBJIAeTCA, 4TO M3p Vl FOpogCKOVI COBeT 3,gMOHgca HaCTOAWVIM 06bABnAK)T CeHTA6pb 2020 Foga MecggeM flpegOTBpameHVIA CaMOy6w1 CTB B ropo,ge 3,gMOHgC. gala 1 ceHTA6pA, 2020 r. Packet Pg. 9 5.1.b KOREAN VERSION T z1 -YT �F zF 0110 z T °„ d �I F-F. ;Ell-q TF z1011 C4,LlI H (National Suicide Prevention AFof zz I�H ����a °t o r �11T�L 0Lifeine)L TI -6H 01I o' °t TI 1 �F zl �F La z �11 o d �I �f. 1-800-273-TALK(8255)-i�-r- L1 QF o f,7i LF suicidepreventionlifeline. org E o L o 1-d''k19 . o << AF INFO CF„ o AF IM�7 "OI 9zL L-i T a 01 0- a ,9z 8-14OIzL �*i z oF TL dL I C AF AH7Fo 0121 A1B4 O1y -k -6 �� �� y� dH71�[ AF-FOi�I L---- LI °Hoke z o�� moo, oz, moo, 00,1� Tom, o�, O o�d�, T ooz llI z' T AAE=j LIEF. 0I� TFz�011 oFzH LF(American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, AFSP)011 «Fz°q, 0I--0I1),1 TFz1� 21 41 a°i 10 TI, 10,k11011),1 3011 �F0121 �Fo a°i 2TI ' LI EF. 2018 Ll 111 � L1 °11011 M 48,000 0 010' 21 4o� z 01 T,F zF� �F o AH 01 l (OH z' o 1327i 21 T l- 01-7I011L L1--21 �� �Fz� �F7i 13.5°�°z F�I�EL tic' �Ho °iol o -61 djk-ICI ° - �, - �o�� �oHz� �� T o�E1T 7�oFo`� Doff Edmonds-Woodway— 10 12 2018 zi L 1�F(Heaithy Student survey) 011 �1 T z1 i—= 1. TF z� �I � SI T 9", TF z1 of Al- oI' z Oil 1H �H ��A" d �I �F. 65,k11 01CD' 1 -71TTFL 0I� °I�21 °k 13%z f�loF�l°F X�"Fo L1),1121 18% 3 �f of �I 1 �;7C1 d Ll Cl-.Q` I F 1 7� z2oo �17C1 of o o Ll r-F T -iff o tJ S1 EL T 0 -7F�, Lid, off, 01 , 21� L1L7H �lo11 -k �o�Laz15=1 6FO� 100021 -kFo1011711 TI TA T� OI o o z DI -lr-F. �1T AEsF ���1�� �� €�� 0121�z ;; L �H�FT°I �Fo3z �Fz�� —o z oo, o �,� 11� - EH6E�I °F� �, 01 z1�F �l o,f �I��I tE�E 010��I z �F` �F� Tzl 0 C,D= C) F-- T LI 4 Packet Pg. 10 5.1.b �IzOilEL 1TTo'LiTI� X1 LaoE0-kilrLFxI L�H��;rIfF`T°� �i�z LFLF�F�I o�0z�L��f AlZo�o�L ufE1�1;If IF 1I' Oil 71I7 OH� O��O�OO Od dCD L1 �1 °i �I z ��H.1 'z o> d LI EF. Tzl CDc::, �� �C) a� 00H21 To"z o°H Tzl �T7F �FLioF21 ,�,��� oF2 °��FL �Fz' z �Fo �' o��l�l�� T°�°i�F�F zg�E�FL o� z o1-61-16M d LI�F. TaIL 4L TT zo1 AI LFz LH01 XI-Li°I � o'�II �H�H ���F�, 0 �� �� �F,, Lid, 0I2F EHQFoE❑�, �� zi�F �11�1� 0I z21 L�H�11 �H�F o[�Fz z �'6E�I L1 z z �,� z aOI-61 dLl�F. LFLF�F L1�F OAF, LTF �ilAlXl, �il�, °FT, O� T71�I7il XFLiol �g°ELF L �.� z »H �I oE� �F z� TI �I z �°F�� d L ElI 3 ��ol z' T 0; d LI �F. 01011, 0II�°���121 �Io,2F A1211I-7F 2020Ll 9zz 0II�°J'��121 T, 011HCD —101 z_�3 L1 6E7 1 _ F- A h=1 . z N f: 2020 Ll 9 Packet Pg. 11 5.1.b CHINESE VERSION f JjS�G'1�,77l�, a (National Suicide Prevention Lifeline 9,fA)21-0o zi t 1-800-273-TALK (8255) -"Xil�%q7 suicidepreventionlifeline. org -T; 9A �A */./"J'NBril/ H-AJ-p IUD 9A 8-14 H* V,)1 ,"4t-QBOPhnA M. E- AAq"A; Wt Q (AFSP) 10 f1, Q 10 YU 34 �` n, A-2 'P, riA-AlgA- �)QE-it 1.,Q; R VT'; 20181-X;q0,-48,000A�-Tr1A:, 132 10:�, '�'Jn�Tx 13.5%; R -T; 1t 2018(Washington State Healthy Student Survey) rP, Edmonds-Woodway A r-x 104-1&fp 12 n, rj n An, * H 4�J`ft,b; 1. -T; 65MMAnn, 13%, LLN- r-Mi18%, JLArA X )AYrr; ; A 0-fl1bgA tkVNIL4iLRifIn,1 ±E1E,4131)Q; A C, 1�T�A�""►J���I�xA4rnfr; YAM fql, " N -T- A-01A 41ML'fII5> AMAL�'I n AWjLo �n� T r1 i'c pr i)C 11 -i442020*9A n- rJ Affl�A (Suicide Prevention Month in the City of Edmonds) o Q M: 2020 "T 9 A 1 H o Packet Pg. 12 5.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Snohomish Health District Suicide Prevention Report Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History This September the City of Edmonds and its partners are raising awareness and bringing the community together around suicide prevention. Suicidal thoughts can affect anyone regardless of age, gender, race, orientation, income level, religion, or background. According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death among adults, and the 2nd leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 10 and 34 in the United States. Residents age 65 and older comprise about 13% of the U.S. population but account for over 18% of all suicides, with the most common cause for elderly suicide, as for all suicides, is untreated depression. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Wendy Burchill, a Healthy Communities Specialist from the Snohomish Health District, will be making a presentation before Council about suicide and suicide prevention in Snohomish County. Attachments: Edmonds202O Packet Pg. 13 5.2.a SEPTEMBER.'s SUICIDE PREVENTION MONTH r a Packet Pg. 14 5.2.a https://youtu.be/xZbdfZpzhgM r a Packet Pg. 15 5.2.a Suicide Trend by Age Group, Snohomish County, 2013-2018 30 25 O O c 0 20 0 L 15 �c 10 6.5 5 0 2013 1.5 2014 2.95 2015 2016 2017 27.4 25-44 1.4 NOR." 0 a as c 0 c m as a 0) .2 N t R d 2 E 0 0 cn 0 N O N N 0 E Source: Washington Stal w Department of Health, r Center for Health Statistics, Death t Certificate Data, 2012- m 2018, Community Healt r Q Assessment Tool (CHA' Packet Pg. 16 5.2.a Youth Suicides (0-18)9 Snohomish County, 2014-2019 (ending June, 2019) School Years MALE FEMALE 0 a as c 0 c m as L .2 N r V �L r N t M E 0 0 r- U) 0 N O N 0 E Source: Washington Stat w Department of Health, Center for Health Statist t Death Certificate Data um 2014-2019 a Packet Pg. 17 5.2.a Over aten-year period (2006-2016): 0 gtn graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has increased by nearly 50% (8.8% to 13.7%) • I Ot" graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also increased nearly 50% (12.2% to 17.5%) • 12th graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also nearly doubled (9. 1 % to 17.5 % ) • 12th graders who have seriously considered attempting suicide has nearly doubled (11.7% to 22. 7%) Packet Pg. 18 5.2.a Suicide is complex. There are almost always multiple causes, including mental illnesses, that may not have been recognized or treated. Death by suicide is rarely caused by a single event, such as a recent job loss, divorce, bullying, or bad grades. Mental disorders and/or substance abuse have been found in 90 percent of people who have died by suicide. Personal stories from those who overcame a suicidal crisis or a suicide attempt are affective and impactful ways to offer hope. Hope in any form can help someone overcome a suicidal crisis. When it comes to individuals who struggle with suicidal thoughts, suicide is not the problem, it's the solution to a perceived unsolvable problem. This is why appropriate treatment interventions are so important. Asking someone directly about suicidal intent lowers anxiety, opens up communication and lowers the risk of an impulsive act. Packet Pg. 19 5.2.a WHYTALKABO UT UIC jW - Discussing suicide (in person or in the media) carefully and appropriately, can change public misperceptions correct myths reduce stigma encourage those who are vulnerable or at risk to seek help. =* PREVENT future suicides E L O Q Qi C O CL .3 r N 0 E O O C Y CD O N N C O E W E w a Packet Pg. 20 5.2.a Take and/or offer trainings like Mental Health First Aid or QPR Partner with area mental health providers and crisis resources to keep the conversation about suicide in the forefront Utilize social media platforms to accurately relay hopeful survivor stories and resources Be the source for timely and accurate data about suicide in your community Provide crisis line information and mental health resources to clients, community members and/or students via flyers, posters, cards, and on student IDs Packet Pg. 21 5.2.a 24/7 consultation with professional staff Urgent appointments ➢ 800-584-3578 425-258-4357 �F GET CONNECTED. Packet Pg. 22 5.2.a American Foundation for Suicide Prevention www.afsp.org k National Association of School Psychologists www.nasponlinE.ork ■ Suicide Prevention Resource Center www.sprc.org ■ The Trevor Project www.thetrevorproject.org ■ Mental Health First Aid www.meritalhealthfirstaid.�r Packet Pg. 23 5.2.a YIRT Volunteers of America Western Washington's Behavioral Health Services, in coordination with Snohomish County Human Services, is pleased to announce the Youth Incident Response Team (YIRT). YIRT is a specialty program that will provide free, short-term crisis intervention and prevention services to families, schools and communities which have experienced a significant community -based trauma involving or impacting youth.The team consists of mental health professionals with specialized training in trauma - informed care and disaster response.They will utilize strength based, solution -focused, culturally competent trauma informed approaches. This service is available throughout Snohomish County during regular business hours: Monday through Friday, 8am-5pm to individuals and groups. To access these services, contact the 24/7 Care Crisis Line at 1-800 584-3578 or email Pat Morris,YIRT Project manager at ?morris&voaww.org Packet Pg. 24 5.2.a Community COVID Outreach Counselors Program The Community COVID Outreach Counselors Program can provide emotional support services to residents of Snohomish County whose mental health has been impacted by COVID-19. Snohomish County residents living through the COVID pandemic will experience varying degrees of anxiety, trauma, stress and depression. Community COVID Outreach Counselors will provide short-term interventions designed to provide emotional support and to connect residents with needed services and resources. Community COVID Outreach Counselors will receive direct referrals as well as referrals from 211, family members, friends, co-workers, teachers, neighbors and others concerned about how individuals are coping with COVID induced changes.The Counselors will provide short-term interventions that help citizens understand their current situation and reactions. To access the service, residents in need may call 2-1-1. E L 0 Q NQi 0 W L N W 0 E 0 0 _ 0 N O N N 0 E W E Q Packet Pg. 25 5.2.a Fr -I WA Listens A new program that provides nonclinical support to people experiencing elevated stress due to COVID-19. Call 1-833-681-021 1 to be connected to a live support specialist. The support specialist will listen and connect you to community resources in your area.The program is anonymous and no identifying information is maintained. www.walistens.o:g Packet Pg. 26 5.2.a 647 kIt How Right Now "How Right Now" is an initiative to address people's feelings of grief, loss and worry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, it aims to increase people's ability to adapt and be resilient during this time.The How Right Now initiative is funded by the CDC Foundation. www.howrightnow.org Packet Pg. 27 5.2.a Packet Pg. 28 5.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Tree Board Report Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Michelle Martin Background/History The City's Tree Board is established under Chapter 10.95 of the Edmonds City Code. It is comprised of seven members plus one alternate and has one non -voting ex-officio City Council member. The Development Services Department provides administrative support. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The Edmonds Tree Board reports annually to the City Council. This year's report is being provided later than usual due to the impacts of COVID-19 on public meetings and group activities. The report has been prepared and will be presented by Tree Board representatives. (See attachment.) Attachments: Tree Board for 9-1-2020 Council Agenda Packet Pg. 29 OHO 1 ree, R1 City of Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board Presentation 2019 annual report to City Council 5.3.a Packet Pg. 30 5.3.a Meet our Members — 2019 It 0 • Bill Phipps, Co -Chair • Vivian Olson, Co -Chair*** 0 m • Frank Caruso, Vice Chair • Steve Hatzen beler* Q • Barbara Chase 0 U • Doug Petersen N 0 N • Gail Lovell 0 • Suzanne Juergensen (Alternate) 0 0 m • Leslie Smith (Student Representative) • Diane Buckshnis (City Council Liaison) a Packet Pg. 31 5.3.a Meet our Members — 2020 It 0 • Frank Caruso, Co -Chair CU 0 • Barbara Chase, Co -Chair L • Bill Phipps • Doug Petersen • Gail Lovell0 0 N • Suzanne Juergensen 0 L • Donna Murphy*** 0 • Ross Dimmick (Alternate)*** L • Diane Buckshnis (City Council Liaison) a Packet Pg. 32 5.3.a Tree Board's Main Mission The City of Edmonds Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting and maintaining of trees for the long term benefit to our community. N 9 V top r rree, Ri 09 O Q d R 7 C a CU O m Q O U 0 N O N A 0 L R O m L F- d E t :i a Packet Pg. 33 . . . . OF ED&O Year in Review — 2019 c tghr f ree, RiV;V a Edmonds is now in its 91hyear as a Tree City USA Our 41h Growth Award (meaning we worked hard!) Earth Day — City Park Ivy pull: partnered with City Parks Department Trees in downtown Edmonds identified with temporary name tags Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour — 3rd time trees identified 5.3.a a Packet Pg. 34 OF ED&O Year in Review — 2019 c tghr f ree, RiV;V a • Improved and expanded on the Tree Board website • Completed a final draft of Trees for Small Spaces brochure • Arbor Day Planting Celebration at the greenway by Yost Park and Main Street • Saturday Market Info Booth and Tree Raffle • Participated with the City on the formulation of an Urban Forest Management Plan 5.3.a a Packet Pg. 35 OF ED&O Year in Review — 2019 c tghr f ree, RiV;V a 5.3.a Conducted a class on all aspects of trees at the Anderson Center in October Assisted the Students Saving Salmon group by planting trees and shrubs at Shell Creek by the Holy Rosary Church in March a Packet Pg. 36 I 4. r' 5.3.a NO 5 • O r � � 41 f Cu O m 1 � • �, � C • f . o fee`, f c F N 10 WiL.. ' L 4- 0 L a Packet Pg. 37 'c- kl. Packet Pg. 40 ',1 4 �pFfFSIYpj , � iHF:VfEW c� ,/¢ 1 1 yr ;ice 5.3.a Packet Pg. 43 • of ED4o Tree Board Current Work jght Tree, Continue to distribute `Before you grab that chainsaw...' and Small Trees brochures Continue to provide input on the Urban Forest Management Program and a Tree Code Continue education and stewardship — Earth Day, Farmer's Market, Arbor Day 5.3.a W. 09 a Packet Pg. 44 ED Tree Board Current Work 1G Igor ? Ice, Right4 Continue to partner with Students Saving Salmon Work with the newly hired full-time Arborist for the city Partner with the Edmonds Library on a workshop for children on the importance of trees in the environment 5.3.a W. 09 O Q d R c c a L R MO W Q O U 0 N N A L O O m L F_ d V a Packet Pg. 45 0F EDP j `~ N 2020 Plans in Summary �a6r ee, as� Educate and assist through various activities and events including: • Earth Day event (Yost Park Clean-up) • Summer market • Downtown educational tree tags • Edmonds in Bloom garden tour with tree identification • Arbor Day Tree planting with Parks Department • Workshop for children at the Edmonds Library 5.3.a t. a Packet Pg. 46 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 25, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 08-25-2020 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 47 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING DRAFT MINUTES August 25, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Mayor Pro Tern Susan Paine, Council President Pro Tern Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Mike Nelson, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Serv. Dir Rob English, City Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas described the procedures for audience comments. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Council President Pro Tern Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials, with the exception of Mayor Nelson, were present, participating remotely. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 48 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 6.3 be removed from the Consent Agenda and discussed during Consent. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REMOVE ALL ACTIONS ITEMS EXCEPT ITEM 1, 2021-2026 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Councilmember K. Johnson explained it has been the Council's practice to have discussion before taking action. The Council has not had discussion on Items 3, 4 and 5. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for removing those items, particularly having discussion on Item 7.2, if there are no time constraints, due to the number of citizen comments. Council President Pro Tern Paine preferred to retain Item 4, Compensation of Legislative/Executive Assistant to Council, as it had been discussed amply. Councilmember K. Johnson clarified her motion was move those items to discussion and not remove them from the agenda. She will propose something separate for Item 7.2, Informational Panel at the Salish Crossing. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE ACTION ITEMS 3, 4, AND 5 TO DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR TONIGHT. Councilmember L. Johnson did not support the motion as each of these item has been discussed previously at one time or another and she preferred to retain them as action items. When the Council reaches that item, members have the option of deciding whether to take different action. Councilmember Olson expressed support for moving items that have not been previously discussed which would include Item 7.2, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Dept. Update/New Program, in view of the Council's protocol. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas advised Item 7.2 was an action item on the agenda. Councilmember Olson recalled Councilmember K. Johnson indicated she would address Item 7.2 later. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS ITEMS TO DISCUSSION: 2,4 AND 5. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO POSTPONE INDEFINITELY ACTION ITEM 7.3, INFORMATIONAL PANEL AT SALISH CROSSING — COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE ITEM 7.2 TO DISCUSSION DUE TO THE NUMBER OF Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 49 7.1.a EMAILS RECEIVED IN THE LAST 2 DAYS AND IF THERE ARE NO TIME CONSTRAINTS, IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE ANOTHER WEEK. Councilmember K. Johnson said in their conversation today, the Parks & Recreation and Cultural Services Director said it was fine with her if the Council wanted to discuss this item this week and take action next week. The Council usually does not take action on something they have not heard before. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said that was her understanding as well. Councilmember Distelhorst commented just because an item is on the agenda as an action item does not mean the Council is required to act on it tonight. Even if the agenda was not amended, the Council could decide to delay action until next week. Councilmember Olson commented this is a very complex agenda item and the first hint of the topic was on Friday. She understood and respected that there was some sense of urgency, but as she expected there was a lot to delve into and it was more appropriate as a discussion item. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD RESIDENTIAL SIGN CODE ENFORCEMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled last week Mayor Nelson said he was not prepared to discuss this item and it would be on the agenda this week. A memorandum has been provided by Development Services Director Shane Hope which Councilmember Buckshnis hoped could be introduced into the record. The memorandum provides all the information necessary to show that the residential sign code is being enforced. Councilmember Distelhorst asked whether it would be possible to submit the memo and have it recorded in the minutes so it was memorialized versus having it as action item. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said ordinarily something would not be added to the minutes without Council action to direct that that occur. Some direction to add it to the minutes would be helpful. Councilmember L. Johnson said it appears what was promised last week was provided in the memo. If the motion was not approved, she was in favor of a motion of putting that memo into the minutes. A date has been included in the memo and at this point it appears to be an administrative issue and she preferred to let that play out. Council President Pro Tern Paine said after reading the memo, it is clear this an administrative manner that is being handled at the appropriate level and did not necessarily need Council action. This is not a policy discussion, it is strictly an administrative body of work. She did not see a need to add the memo to the minutes. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas reminded the motion is to include residential sign code enforcement on the agenda as action item. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there seemed to be a dispute between the administration and citizens last week and a number citizens contacted her and hopefully other Councilmembers. Her intent was to introduce the memo into minutes via whatever vehicle the Council wished. She recalled there was a phone Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 50 message saying it wasn't going to happen and now there is a date certain when it will happen. She agreed it was an administrative issue, but it was a legislative issue last week. Her intent was to make public what had happened. Councilmember Olson favored having the memorandum added to minutes via any process. She was confused regarding how to vote on the motion because she would like to vote for a process to include the memo in the minutes. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas reminded the motion is to include residential sign code enforcement on the agenda as action item. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS:HZOOM.US/S/4257752525) Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. Greg Toy, Edmonds, was sorry the Council voted to not include residential sign code enforcement on the agenda. He received Ms. Hope's memo this afternoon. He thanked her and her team for resolving the other code violation, the removal of a flagpole that was 18-feet above the roofline of the garage that had cameras that could peer into neighboring bedroom and a skull and crossbones flag. He referred to the third letter that had been sent to this individual that now has a compliance date of September 15t''. He found it problematic that it took 2'/2 months after such a gross code violation was brought to the attention of the enforcement division to initiate this type of enforcement action where a specific date was mentioned. The letter fails to recognize another requirement of the code which is the setback from the property line. If this individual complies with the height and size of the significant requirement but posts it on his property line at the street, another letter will have to be written to address that specific code violation for the same sign. All three of those requirements, the size, height and the setback could have been addressed in one letter. He still did not completely understand the divergency between the mayor and the director of code enforcement's statements, but it seems they are now on the same page. He agreed with Council comments that this is now an administrative issue and not a policy issue. There is still a question related to the cameras on the roof and whether that is a violation. He summarized code enforcement is important and from a policy standpoint, should be a priority of the mayor. With regard to the emergency powers granted to the Mayor in March, he was unsure to what extent Mayor Nelson was utilizing those powers, but five months seemed an extraordinary length of time for emergency powers to be granted and it may be time for the Council to resume its authority and revisit that issue. Lori Rasmussen, Edmonds, pointed out during voting, the chair who is usually the president of the Council, has an opportunity to comment and persuade the vote but when acting as chair, if she understood Roberts Rules correctly, that position needs to stay impartial and not sway the vote or give favoritism and not vote unless there is a 3-3 tie. She acknowledged it may be difficult to remember when switching roles. If she is correct, the chair stays neutral, doesn't persuade on the topic and only votes when there is a 3-3 tie. (Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmonds.wa.gov are attached.) 6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 51 7.1.a City Clerk Scott Passey reminded that Item 6.3 was pulled under Approval of the Agenda and will be the first action item. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 11, 2020 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 11, 2020 4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 5. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FROM CARMEN ROSS ($349.99) 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 18, 2020 (Previously Consent Agenda Item 7.3) Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 26, 7t' line of the first full paragraph, and requested "code of conduct" be changed to "code of ethics." COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON FOR APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 18, 2020 AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Olson raised a point of order asking if there was a ruling on the Roberts Rules of Order cited during public comment regarding the chair voting. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded the RCW clearly states when a Councilmember is serving as Mayor Pro Tern, the Councilmember is entitled to vote. 2. 2021-2026 SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss recalled staff made a presentation in July regarding the 2021-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The only public comment during the public hearing was regarding accidents and the intersection delay at 220t1' & 84'1'. Staff requested the 3-year accident history for the intersection and found there had only been 5 accidents in the past 3 years, or 1.7 accidents/year which is a low accident rate considering the high traffic volume at the intersection and there were no reoccurring types of accidents. With regard to the intersection delay, Mr. Hauss explained the adopted level of service standard is LOS D; based on modeling done in 2015, the level of service at that intersection is LOS B or approximately a 10 second delay per approach. That is a very good traffic flow and there are no long queues even in the PM peak hours. That information was provided to the person who made those comments at the public hearing. Councilmember Buckshnis said people keep asking her about this and although she asked about it before, the discussion bifurcated into the parking garage. She referred to project 40, Downtown Lighting Improvements for $1.5 million which she recognized was funded by a grant. The project description is installing streetlights on both sides of Dayton Street and other lights in the proximity of the Edmonds Transit Center. She said $1.5 million seemed like a tremendous amount of money for that one street and around the transit center. Mr. Hauss answered these are preliminary cost estimates, the original project was primarily Dayton Street and around the transit station but as the project moves forward, other locations will be Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 52 7.1.a identified where streetlights and pedestrian lights can be added. The scope of the project could definitely increase which is why the cost is higher than first anticipated for the project. Councilmember Buckshnis said she still believes consideration should be given to parking. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to project 36, 4t' Avenue Corridor Enhancement Walkway, commenting she was very interested in this project. A master plan of the corridor is being prepared this year to develop concepts. At a meeting she attended last night, she noticed the project on 4' Avenue had been truncated, excluding Dayton to Main and looking only at Main to 3' Avenue. She suggested it would be in the City's best interest to look at the entire corridor even if there are segments that would be installed at different times. Projects like this take a long time and it was unfortunate the Dayton Street project was completed without any consideration of the 4' Avenue Corridor. To coordinate efforts, Councilmember K. Johnson suggested changing the definition of #36 to include from Dayton Street to Main Street, noting there did not need to be any change to the funding because not all the work would be done this year. Mr. Hauss said he would need to talk to the project manager, Frances Chapin; he did not remember the project ever extending to Dayton. Councilmember K. Johnson said the concept was developed around 2006 and was adopted by the Planning Board along with a change to the zoning to accommodate it. Mr. Hauss offered to follow-up with Ms. Chapin. Mr. Williams said in the 10 years he has been with the City, the cultural corridor was from Main toward the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA). Councilmember K. Johnson disagreed. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the construction of the Dayton Street Plaza, but did not recall the 4' Avenue Corridor going from Dayton to ECA. She remembered it being from Main to the ECA. Council President Pro Tern Paine suggested getting a cost estimate for that section. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said she also remembered it being from Main to the ECA, noting she had followed that issue even before she was on the Council. Councilmember K. Johnson said there is a presentation on the City's website that shows the timeline and the extent of the project. She feared if the segment from Dayton to Main was ignored in the master plan, it may not get implemented. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas asked if the Council could move forward with approving the TIP and staff follow-up on Councilmember K. Johnson's question. Mr. Williams answered there are no funds budgeted for the project. He had no issue with staff looking at Main to Dayton to determine what has been done in the past and whether to include it. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas asked if approval of the TIP needed be delayed pending that research. Mr. Williams answered no, Mr. Hauss, Mr. English and he can research when or whether that was part of the project, and return to Council to determine whether it should be included. With that direction, he recommended the Council approve the TIP. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, FOR APPROVAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS SUBMITTED (RESOLUTION NO. 1454) WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVISE IT IN THE FUTURE. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled when the Dayton Street plaza was constructed 6-7 years ago, at one point it was called the anchor of the 4th Avenue Corridor. She said Councilmember K. Johnson, who was on the Planning Board at the time, would remember. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 53 7.1.a 3. INFORMATIONAL PANEL AT THE SALISH CROSSING - COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director Angie Feser reviewed: • Objective: Council's direction of $4,000 funding allocation to produce and install Edmonds High School Portico information panel at Salish Crossing. • Portico background 0 1909 Edmonds High School 0 2005 Demolition - Edmonds Center for the Arts o Portico removed and stored 0 2015 Echelbarger family restored it at current location at Cascadia Art Museum 0 2018 Concept presented to Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) by then-Councilmember Teitzel ■ HPC unable to provide formal support as it was no longer at original location 0 2019 South Snohomish Historical Society Board supported concept of informational panel • Recent history of panel project o Late 2019 $4,000 allocation approved by City Council o Became item #15 of 2020 Carryforward Budget Amendment o February 25, 2020 Council meeting - allocation removed from carryforward budget amendment and direction to return to Council for future discussion • Consideration of public panels/artwork located on private property o Various examples of panels at fishing pier, Yost Park and downtown restrooms and (12) historic art panels throughout downtown • Panel Detail o Photo of sample 18" x 60" panel o Cost estimate ■ Design $1,400 ■ Fabrication $2,600 o Parks & Recreation will oversee design and installation o Easement agreement with Salish Cross property owners specify informational panel remains City property. If portico demolished or moved, City will remove and repurpose the informational panel and supportive structure • Panel Text o The original Edmonds High School was constructed in 1909 at 6th Avenue and Glen Street. The building was brick with an entrance portico constructed of terra cotta sections made to look like stone. Generations of Edmonds students passed through this portico as the school expanded with new additions for the high school and the buildings later served as a junior high school. In 2005 the original high school building was demolished to make way for the parking lot and other improvements for the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The portico was removed piece by piece and put in storage. Ten years later the portico was restored to original condition by the Echelbarger family and sited on the corner of Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue as part of the development of the Cascadia Art Museum site in 2015. o Proposed additional text: ■ Although not in its original location, the portico serves as a reminder of the pride Edmonds had in its expanding cultural institutions in 1909-1910 with the construction of both its first high school and a Carnegie Library. Councilmember Olson commented the Echelbarger family has been very generous to the City and has developed all their projects with care and in ways that enhance Edmonds. There was a comment in My Edmonds News suggesting that the new Council had a personal vendetta against Mr. Echelbarger. That comment missed the mark and had nothing to do with it. In her opinion, while this may be allowable, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 7 Packet Pg. 54 7.1.a government should not be trying so hard to spend money and it seemed like a great opportunity for a GoFundMe by the Edmonds High School alumni. All that said, this was approved by a past Council and the Council should not necessarily be in the business of overturning a small project like this that was important to several people. She voiced her support for funding the informational sign. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, TO APPROVE THE FUNDING AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SIGNAGE FOR THE PORTICO PROJECT. Councilmember L. Johnson, HPC Chair when then-Councilmember Teitzel brought this to the commission, recalled the commission clarified the portico was a historical artifact that had been removed from its historic location. She appreciated the additional text to clarify that. The HPC, which is bound by the Department of Interior standards, stated it was outside their purview to offer support on the project which is why they took the stance they did. Council President Pro Tem Paine echoed Councilmember Olson's comments, a prior Council took this action. She suggested if there was an objection to using public funds, another possible funding source was the Parks gift fund. She was unsure the amount in the gift fund, recalling the panel was scheduled to be funded via last year's Council fund. Councilmember K. Johnson said this has been on the extended agenda for some time. She sent a request a week ago to Councilmember L. Johnson and Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas inquiring about this. She felt it was inappropriate for the Council to discuss this without input from the HPC. She agreed this was not a vendetta against the Echelbargers; she is a supporter of the Cascadia museum and said they have done a fantastic job developing that property although she has heard they have sold the property. It is not a question of whether the Council is in favor of property owner, but the principle of historic preservation. Councilmember K. Johnson recalled the original funding source of the $4,000 proposed by then- Councilmember Teitzel was Council Contingency. She recalled Councilmembers Buckshnis, Teitzel, Tibbett and Mesaros supported that project in late 2019 and then-Councilmember Mayor Nelson, Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas and she did not support it. When this year's Council considered the carryforward budget, which included $4,000 for the informational sign, she made a motion not to fund it and it was approved 6-1 with Councilmember Buckshnis, who had previously supported the sign, voting no. Therefore, she did not understand why staff felt they need direction when the Council provided clear direction via the decision not to fund the project. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out she was not present when the HPC made the decision regarding the sign, but several commissioners asked her to looking into the matter. She referred to Chapter 10.90 which highlights the powers and duties of the HPC. The HPC wanted to know if the code needed to be changed to avoid something like this occurring in the future. After speaking with Planning Manager Rob Chave and City Attorney Jeff Taraday and a careful reading of the code, she did not think a change needed to be made to the code. Chapter 10.90.040(J) states the HPC advises the city council and chief local elected official generally on matters of historic planning and preservation. The HPC would like to participate in making sure that the information on the panel is accurate. Councilmember K. Johnson said it was within the HPC's purview to make a decision about the panel; the reason the HPC did not accepted it was because the portico had been physically moved and according to the Secretary of Interior standards, an item cannot be considered historic if it is moved. She suggested it would be fine if the historic museum or the property owner wanted to sponsor or pay for the sign. As a former Edmonds Junior High student, she would be supportive of the project if it was located on the original site, but because it had been moved and was no longer historically valid, calling it an information panel was calling a horse by another color as it was historically inaccurate. That is why she made a motion to remove Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 8 Packet Pg. 55 funding for the sign; it is nothing personal against the property owner but the principle of historic preservation. Councilmember Buckshnis said Councilmember K. Johnson and she have had many discussions about the sign. She has always believed that Councilmembers should support each other. This came to the Finance Committee, comprised of Councilmember Mesaros and her at the time, and they, along with Development Services Director Shane Hope, Arts & Culture Program Manager Frances Chapin, and then-Councilmember Teitzel discussed the informational panel. This does not set a precedent, the City has installed other informational panels for tourism and providing information for people who walk by the portico. She respected then-Councilmember Teitzel who brought it forward and she felt it was a good idea. She did not look at it from a historical perspective, but from an informational perspective, assisting the City's tourism and she will continue to support it. She agreed when the carryforward budget amendment was considered, the Council did not include that funding so there were currently no funds allocated. Councilmember Distelhorst referred to packet page 140, Attachment 1 to this agenda item, the minutes from the February 25, 2020 meeting which stated, "She asked whether the carryforward amendments could be approved with the exception of this amendment and that project be returned to Council for future discussion. Mr. James answered yes." His recollection from the February 25' meeting was that it would come back to Council another time and that was why it was on tonight's agenda. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said she initially voted against the project for numerous reasons that Councilmember K. Johnson mentioned. She voted to suspend the funding to allow the new Council time to think about it. She said Councilmember K. Johnson is correct, it isn't historical preservation because the portico is not at its original site, but that is why the text on the panel talks about where it was originally. The biggest issue she has with this is a previous Council voted for this and the Council needs to stand up for votes that Council took regardless of whether she supports it. It has nothing to do with the Echelbargers, Lindsey Echelbarger is a fantastic person and has done some marvelous things for the City. She recalled other examples of the Council supporting something and then a future Council moving in another direction; the marsh is a great example. It isn't fair to the property owners for the Council to support it and then say they don't support it. The Council can find the $4,000 to support this project and owes it to the Echelbargers because the Council supported it last year. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas was suggesting $4,000 come from the Council Contingency. When the project was pulled from the carryforward budget, the money went back into the Council Contingency. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas responded there is a lot of money in the Council budget because the Council is not doing anything. This discussion needed to happen and now she will vote to support the project. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO HAVE THE $4,000 COME FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND. Councilmember K. Johnson said each Council can choose what they want to do, it's not like a promise was made. It was proposed in December and voted down in February and nothing has happened since then. If the Council plans to spend this money, the packet information should have been provided to the HPC so they could weigh in on the subject. She recalled when she initially talked to Councilmember L. Johnson, she indicated she would honor that. Even if the Council decides to move forward, it is inappropriate to do so at this time. Her objection had nothing to do with the property owner, although she believed the Echelbargers no longer owned the property, but was related to providing correct information. The difference between a historical and an informational marker is it would never be a historical marker because it has been moved. Calling it an informational marker is going around the idea of historic preservation and historic information. She did not support the project. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 9 Packet Pg. 56 UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (6-1), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. 4. COMPENSATION OF LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO COUNCIL Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas explained she was presenting this as HR Director Neill Hoyson had a family emergency. Two meetings ago the Council directed Ms. Neill Hoyson to determine the equivalent compensation for a COLA from January through current. Ms. Neill Hoyson provided the following three options: 1. Provide employee with an additional 32.56 hours of vacation. 2. Increase wages for the time period of September 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021 by an additional 3.75% resulting in an additional $1,100.67 in wages. 3. Provide the employee with a lump sum payment in the amount of $1,104.00. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas relayed Ms. Judge's preference for the additional vacation versus cash because it did not impact the City's finances. Councilmember Buckshnis asked how the vacation did not impact the budget. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley- Monillas explained paying Ms. Judge would be an additional $1,110 versus when Ms. Judge is on vacation, no one replaces her. Councilmember Buckshnis said the side effect is work is not done during those 32 hours. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas agreed there was a work impact but no financial impact. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO RECOMMEND OPTION 1 BECAUSE IT IS THE PREFERRED CHOICE OF THE EMPLOYEE. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to an email she sent City Attorney Jeff Taraday before meeting, recalling during a previous discussion, he advised the Council retroactive pay would be a gift of public funds. Mr. Taraday agreed retroactive pay in the absence of a collective bargaining agreement constitutes a gift of public funds. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if any of the options would be considered a gift of public funds. Mr. Taraday answered no if these options were intended to compensate for work she not yet performed. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas said this is for work from January until present, work she has already performed. Mr. Taraday answered in that case it would be a gift of public funds. There is a way to structure it so it meets the constitutional test for gifting of public funds and he can assist with that; it needs to be done in a way that compensates her for work not yet performed. Councilmember K. Johnson assumed that test could not be met with this proposal. Mr. Taraday answered he would need to look into it. If Ms. Neill Hoyson had worked with Sharon Cates in his office, he believed it would be fine because they both understand that retroactive pay cannot be authorized. It could be that Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas had a different understanding of the materials than Ms. Neill Hoyson would have provided. He had a conversation with Ms. Neill Hoyson about this matter and knew she understood it could not be structured in a manner that compensated for work already preformed. Therefore, he assumed, without careful study, that these documents were intended to compensate for work that had not yet been performed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 10 Packet Pg. 57 Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas said she has been out of loop other than presenting for Ms. Neill Hoyson tonight. Councilmember Olson preferred to have this verified before taking a vote that might be illegal. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas pointed out this document was written by Lighthouse staff. Councilmember L. Johnson said in light of the uncertainty, she agreed with Councilmember Olson. She asked if there would be any impact of bringing this back on Consent next week to verify. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas did not see an issue with scheduling it on Consent next week. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if it would impact the vacation schedule. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley- Monillas said it may slightly impact the vacation accrual which was based on today's date. As long as there was not a big impact, Councilmember L. Johnson preferred to ensure the Council was proceeding legally. Council President Pro Tern Paine relayed her understanding that last week the Council approved the contract and the compensation was the only remaining decision. Mr. Taraday said that was also his recollection. The timing should not matter because the accrual rate can be adjusted if needed. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO BRING THIS BACK ON CONSENT NEXT WEEK. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, there is already a motion on table by Council President Pro Tern Paine to approve Option 1. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Olson wanted to ensure if this was on Consent, there was verification regarding the legality and gift of public funds issues before it was approved. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas assumed it would be researched by Lighthouse. Mr. Taraday said he will ensure if it is in the packet, that it either has Lighthouse's blessing or if not, he will advise. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out Council President Pro Tern Paine's motion to approve Option 1 was withdrawn and Councilmember K. Johnson's motion did not specify an option. Councilmember K. Johnson said the packet has Options A, B, C. Ms. Judge preferred the option related to vacation time and she was unclear whether that was Option A, B or C. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said the agenda memo identifies Option 1 which is the vacation, Option 2 is to increase the salary through the end of the year, and Option 3 is a lump sum. Councilmember Distelhorst clarified Option A is the vacation option. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO SPECIFY OPTION A. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. CREATION OF SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW UPDATED CODE OF CONDUCT Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas recalled Councilmembers Buckshnis and Olson were interested in forming a subcommittee to consider an update to the code of conduct, whether it is the current code of conduct or Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 11 Packet Pg. 58 7.1.a another code of conduct. She requested anyone interested in serving on the subcommittee contact her and she will appoint the committee members. Councilmember Olson said there has been a lot of discussion since last week including in My Edmonds News by citizens regarding whether the Council should move forward with a code of conduct. Not realizing she would be named as one of the people who wanted a subcommittee formed, she raised a point of order, whether this should be a vote of Council whether to create a subcommittee. She searched the City code regarding the Council President's role in forming a subcommittee and did not find anything so she assumed it would be a Council vote. City Attorney Jeff Taraday answered the City code states the Council President oversees the committee systems and appoints members to committees. That begs the question of whether the matter is being referred to committee. It would be appropriate for the Council to vote to refer the matter to committee and once referred to committee, it would be appropriate for the Council President to appoint members to the committee. Councilmember K. Johnson asked the Public Safety, and Personnel and Planning Committee be appropriate committee to consider the code of conduct if the Council was not having committee of whole meetings. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas answered she assumed so but since committees are not meeting individually at this point, a committee made up of three Council volunteers would be the best move. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO DECIDE AS A COUNCIL RATHER THAN MAKING IT A COUNCIL PRESIDENT DECISION WHETHER TO CREATE A SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY THIS. Councilmember Olson commented there has been substantive citizen input that the new version of the code of conduct is fundamentally flawed from the standpoint of free speech and the democratic process. It will take a huge investment of time and effort to make changes to take those elements out and given what is currently on the Council's plate and with the substantive input from citizens and Councilmembers about what the priorities related to time and effort should be, she proposed the Council not move forward with a code of conduct. The intent of the motion was so Council can discuss whether it's appropriate to dedicate the time and effort this will take. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, stating the correct procedure under Roberts Rules of Order would be to postpone indefinitely. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas denied the point of order as it denies discussion of the motion. Council President Pro Tem Paine appreciated the opportunity to discuss this as an option. There is a need for an updated code of conduct and a subcommittee would add speed and clarity and hopefully allow additions to be made to the code of conduct which could then be presented to the full Council. Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with Council President Pro Tem Paine, a subcommittee would be very helpful. He requested the motion be restated. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas restated the motion: THAT THE COUNCIL DECIDE WHETHER TO HAVE A SUBCOMMITTEE OR NOT. Councilmember Distelhorst said voting on a motion that includes whether or not to approve something is overly vague. The motion should be to approve something or no motion at all. Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas for putting this on the agenda. Given the discussion that occurred previously, she supported moving forward with a subcommittee. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 12 Packet Pg. 59 Councilmember Olson agreed the motion was a change from the agenda narrative which stated the Council President was creating a subcommittee. Her motion was for the Council to decide if they wanted to create a subcommittee. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled a subcommittee on the marsh last year fell through the cracks. What Councilmember Olson is attempting to say is having a balanced subcommittee. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley- Monillas suggested she define balanced as the motion is a decision whether to form a subcommittee. Councilmember Buckshnis explained a balanced committee would be the Council discussing who would be good candidates to be on the committee which is what happened in 2013 when then-Councilmember Bloom was relatively new and she was more experienced. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas asked if Councilmember Buckshnis was suggesting that Councilmembers not support Councilmember Olson's motion. Councilmember Buckshnis clarified Councilmember Olson was suggesting the Council determine who will be on the subcommittee and not leave it up to the Council President. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said the motion is to decide whether to have a subcommittee or not. Councilmember Distelhorst said Councilmember Olson's motion was for the Council to vote on whether the Council will approve forming a subcommittee, not the members. He suggested the motion be reworded to propose forming a Council subcommittee and vote on it. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, THAT THE COUNCIL NOT DO A SUBCOMMITTEE FOR THIS ITEM. City Clerk Scott Passey said Roberts Rules of Order call for affirmative motions to take action versus not taking action. A motion to not take action is simply not making a motion. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas asked if he was suggesting the motion be withdrawn and tabled or withdrawn and restated. Mr. Passey suggested the motion be withdrawn because if a Councilmember did not want a subcommittee, a motion was not required. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, if a Councilmember wants to take no action, the correct motion is to postpone indefinitely. Mr. Passey agreed that was a valid option. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON WITHDREW THE MOTION. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO TABLE INDEFINITELY. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, the motion should be to postpone indefinitely. Mr. Taraday said the motion was ambiguously phrased and he suggested Councilmember Olson clarify whether the motion was to postpone indefinitely or to table. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas ruled Mr. Taraday out of order, stating Councilmember Olson's original motion was to not do a subcommittee. Councilmember Olson had withdrawn that motion and she was waiting for Councilmember K. Johnson to withdraw the second. Councilmember K. Johnson appealed the decision on the point of order, pointing out as Mr. Taraday stated, there are two choices: postpone indefinitely or table to a date certain. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas advised the motion was to table the motion after the previous motion was withdrawn. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 13 Packet Pg. 60 COUNCILMEMBER OLSON WITHDREW THE MOTION. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO POSTPONE INDEFINITELY. Councilmember Olson said she did not want to belabor the point and did not want to disrespect any of the parties involved. She has given this a great deal of thought and has a lot of interaction with people who have had visceral reactions to this code of conduct, some of whom the Council had not heard from before. There is a lot of concern about the democratic process and what this will or will not do that process. It's quite interwoven and substantial and there will not be quick and easy fixes. While she was willing and able to be on the committee, that is time and effort she and others would be putting in that they will not be putting in elsewhere. Postponing indefinitely puts something that's very flawed and will take time to fix into the future when the Council does not have pressing issues to attend to. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas asked if a motion was required to appoint a subcommittee. Mr. Taraday advised there was currently no motion pending. The Council needs to act to refer the code of conduct to committee. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO TABLE THIS UNTIL 20201. Councilmember Olson said this has some merit. There are a lot of critical things on the Council's plate and the Council has not been as involved in the process as she felt would be ideal. Taking the opportunity to be more involved in things going on in City instead of spending time and effort on development of a code of conduct would be a better use of the Council's time and talent. Councilmember K. Johnson recognized that Councilmember L. Johnson has been working on this since before she was elected to office. This has been a major concern of hers and she has not been able to incorporate the many voices about her proposal. This would be an excellent topic for the entire Council at a retreat in 2021. Not only is the proposed code of conduct redundant because the Council already has an adopted code of ethics and an adopted code of conduct, it is different in scope including who is affected. The Council has so much work do this year and this would be a great starting point next year. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, THAT THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A SUBCOMMITTEE TO WORK ON THE PROPOSED CODE OF CONDUCT. Councilmember Distelhorst said although he was not sure he had much free time or talent, he would be willing to put time into this project because there was merit and value in the document. The robust discussion could be taken off the dais and some number of Councilmembers work together and bring the code of conduct back for future discussion. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 14 Packet Pg. 61 7.1.a COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DETERMINE WHO IS ON SUBCOMMITTEE, RATHER THAN THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT. Mr. Passey pointed out that was substantially different than the motion to refer the code of conduct to a subcommittee. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas ruled the motion out of order. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember K. Johnson asked about the parameters of the subcommittee's work, if the subcommittee would only look at the proposal by Councilmember L. Johnson or the existing and whether it would consider the code of conduct and the code of ethics. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas relayed it was her understanding it would look at it all, this is a scratch document. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, THAT THE COUNCIL DISCUSS THE SUBCOMMITTEE FORMATION AND BE PART OF THE SELECTION OF PEOPLE. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas asked if this was appropriate since it goes against the code. Mr. Taraday referred to code section 1.02.031 Council president; subsection B reads, "In addition to any other duties assigned by the city council, the council president shall have the following responsibilities: 1. Assign members of the city council as members and liaisons to boards, commissions, and committees, and otherwise supervise the committee system." Mr. Taraday provided his analysis, in harmonizing the initial phrase, "in addition to any other duties assigned by the city council," that indicates the Council essentially directs the work of the Council President. The word "responsibility" is used instead of "authority." At the end of day, because a four member majority of the Council could amend the code and change the Council President's powers at any time through an ordinance, it makes sense that the Council interpret the code in such a way as to recognize the Council President handles duties assigned by the City Council. Councilmember Buckshnis said obviously with the 4-3 voting and based on language and comments last week where the Council never discussed the resolution, it would behoove Council to discuss committee membership. If two Councilmembers from the 4-3 vote are together, it will result in a 4-3 vote. She was interested in a 7-0 vote. Regardless of the fact that Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said Resolution 1306 was a mess because of the extended review, it actually incorporated input from a lot of citizens. There are people with varying opinions and she did not want two from the same voting group that Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas was part of. Councilmember Olson asked if the MRSC committee creation would have any bearing in addition to the reference in the code about committee creation. MRSC stated the Council may create boards etc. etc., membership and selection of members shall be provided by the Council if not specified otherwise in the City code. Mr. Taraday said that was consistent with what he said. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas agreed. Councilmember Olson said if the code of conduct will apply to everyone and will impact the democratic process, it is imperative that there be representation from a cross section of viewpoints. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 15 Packet Pg. 62 7.1.a Councilmember K. Johnson recommended not only a cross section of viewpoints but also a cross section of experience on the Council. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas said if she makes the appointments, she intended to have a cross section. Councilmember Buckshnis commented if the intent was to start from scratch, there was material from Resolution 1306 and past minutes as well as the resource data from Councilmember L. Johnson's suggestions and her code of conduct. She personally felt there should be two people who had not done any work on the code of conduct so there were no hurt feelings or feeling they were not being heard properly. There needs to be a 7-0 majority vote rather than the 4-3 which has continued through this year. Council President Pro Tem Paine asked if the intent was a two or three person subcommittee. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there were two people in 2013 because it was easier for two people to work rather than three. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas suggested three people, only because if there are two people that think alike, the result can be a document that doesn't address all the issues. Councilmember K. Johnson recommended looking at all past minutes and source materials and not just Councilmember L. Johnson's proposal because there has been a lot of discussion in the past. The proposal from last week is one person's research and one person's opinion and the goal should be to collaborate and have it represent the entire Council not just a 4-3 split or new versus old Councilmembers. She recommend the process not start with last week's proposal but start with what has actually been adopted. Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas said her intent was to have all the information provided to the committee and have the committee vet the issues. The code of conduct will still come back to Council. Councilmember Distelhorst raised a point of clarification, pointing out there was no number of Councilmembers in Councilmember Buckshnis' motion and suggested Councilmember Buckshnis may want to amend the motion to limit the number to two. Council President Pro Tem Paine said regardless of whether she was on the subcommittee, good ideas come from everyone and everyone has a lot of talent and is very thoughtful about moving forward. More material is better than less and it is equally important to consider the path forward. She hoped with any subcommittee that was created, the rest of the Council would trust them to be thorough and diligent, honor the process and look for the goal of a 7-0 vote as that will be important for a code of conduct. Recognizing that ECDC 1.03.031 states that it falls under the purview of the Council President to appoint members to committee, Councilmember L. Johnson asked what precedent would be set by changing this now. Next year a new Council President will make appointment to various boards, commissions, committees, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis she said the Council has in the past and she did not know why everything has become Council President organized or appointed. The Council President appoints members to committees at the beginning of the year. She recalled last year the marsh committee fell apart. In her opinion there should be two people from opposing viewpoints of the 4-3 vote. If there are 3 members, there will be 2 from one of the sides of the 4-3 vote. When she and then-Councilmember Bloom developed the code of conduct, they were not appointed by the Council. There have been other committees where the members have not been appointed such as the levy committee and the long range financial planning committee. The most important thing is getting a 7-0 majority vote and not the 4-3 vote that continues on. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 16 Packet Pg. 63 Councilmember Distelhorst agreed the goal should be a 7-0 vote. However, he did not think it was appropriate to continually refer to 4s and 3s, there are 7 independent Councilmembers who all have independent brains and can vote independently and he requested that be respected. With regard to the legal issue about precedent, Mr. Taraday said the code reflects that the Council President is always subject to the will of the majority of the Council. That may not need to happen very often but there is nothing new from the standpoint of the way the code reads. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND OLSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE VOTING YES, AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said the next step is how to create the committee, how to appoint and how many members. She suggested returning next week with suggestions. Council President Pro Tern Paine suggested moving this item to next week. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED THAT THERE BE TWO MEMBERS, COUNCILMEMBER OLSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas declared a brief recess. 8. STUDY ITEM 1. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPT UPDATE/NEW PROGRAM Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Angie Feser explained this item will be in two parts, an update on the department and how it has been responding to COVID, programs, capital projects and the framework of new program and eventually ask for Council approval of new job descriptions to support that program. She reviewed: • Parks Capital — Waterfront Center o Completion — October 2020 o Opening — November 2020 ■ Restored and enhanced beach area, new walkway and renovated parking lot — opening November 2020 ■ The public private partnership between City and Senior Center resulted in a 26,000 community center for community programs and rental space ■ The City's Recreation Division will provide community space programming Monday — Thursday 4 p.m. to close including an onsite staff member • Parks Capital — Civic Park 0 2020 construction bid o Estimate - $8.6 million o Bid opening on May 19', 2 bids despite 8 general contractors registered to bid o Low bid $11.3 million, exceeded cost estimate by $2.7 million o Analysis/postmortem included interviewing contractors ■ Decision to revise approach and rebid early 2021 • Parks Capital — Marina Beach Park o RCO grant applications (2) ■ Local park - $500,000 ■ Aquatic Land Enhancement Account (ALEA) - $500,000 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 17 Packet Pg. 64 7.1.a ■ Technical review — July ■ Final presentation — late September Department Operations — COVID o Goal: health and safety of public, staff and community while preserving the City Parks and Recreation facilities and assets o Guidelines ■ Federal/CDC ■ State Reopening Plan ■ Snohomish health District ■ City Guidelines o Developed Play It Safe Program based on state's reopening phases and communicated with public ■ All parks and trails and open spaces are open to the public and heavily used ■ Playgrounds remain closed ■ Yost Pool and Hazel Miller Spray Park never opened for the summer Operations — Parks Maintenance o Modified but never shut down o Staff safety ■ Separation of crews into two crews, staggered start time ■ No longer working in pairs, each has own truck and equipment ■ No outbreaks in maintenance staff o Limited staff ■ Working at 65% capacity ■ Hiring freeze o Increased demand on parks ■ Dramatic increase in litter and garbage o Changing duties ■ Restrooms cleaned 2x daily (6-7 hours/day to clean restrooms) o Outdoor staff lunchroom o Fewer projects • Operations — Volunteers o Program options (3) ■ Individuals ■ City sponsored events ■ Groups o Beginning to resuming work ■ New policy and practices o Parks staff planted all flower baskets, basket adoptions sold out • Operations — Recreation Programming o Recreation Programs ■ Contracted/direct ■ Innovative approaches — virtual o Rentals (indoor/outdoor) o Anderson Center leases o Cultural Arts ■ Programs — virtual ■ 4' Avenue Cultural Corridor • Community Partners — COVID Support o Farmer Market ■ Modified o Boys & Girls Club Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 18 Packet Pg. 65 7.1.a o Senior Center o Edmonds Food Bank o Sno-Isle Library o Citywide COVID Response o Mask distribution o Long-term care facilities (65) ■ Weekly calls to 65 long-term District care facilities and relay information back to the Health Councilmember Distelhorst comment he knows what it feels like to have to suddenly shift to pandemic management and thanked Ms. Feser and her staff for keeping staff and residents safe. Ms. Feser responded staff has been absolutely phenomenal, very resilient, developing creative programs even as Governor Inslee has been making changes. The LEAP program is a result of a lot of hard work by staff. Councilmember Olson said the City and its citizens have relied on Parks as well as other departments during COVID. Staff has done a great job and everyone appreciates it. She expressed appreciation for the care, time and attention to long term care facilities, a population the community has been concerned about. Council President Pro Tern Paine echoed Councilmembers Olson and Distelhorst's comment, Parks & Recreation is the glue and soul of the community and recognizing that other departments also contribute to the welfare of the community. She was very pleased there had been no instances of COVID among the maintenance crew. Ms. Feser said she will pass the Council's thanks onto staff. Councilmember K. Johnson clarified the request is for approval of job descriptions for Recreation Leader II and Recreation Leader - General, but in total 22 people will be hired or reassigned to LEAP. The narrative says it is revenue neutral, but it would be helpful for Council to have more information about the cost breakdown. The plan is for 100 kids in the program out of a potential 3,000 kids in the community. She asked how the program will remain revenue neutral if there are more or less kids. This a very creative and adaptive proposal for families and children in Edmonds and she appreciated the work that has been done but she wanted more revenue information. Ms. Feser reviewed the Learning Enhancement & Activities Program (LEAP): • Objective: Council's consideration of approval of two job descriptions to support the implementation of the LEAP Program (changed when this item was moved to a Study Item) • We are living, working and operating in unprecedented times which require adaptive programming to meet community needs • Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department has been innovative and modified all programs • Program feasibility shifted to full development with ESD's recent announcement of full-time distance learning ■ Day camp program with academic support for Edmonds children and families who may not have the ability to work from home and support children's education o Fluid time and program can be flexible based on community needs o Sense of urgency, tentative start date of October 5; job descriptions, recruitment, hiring, and training required pushing that out a week • Purpose o Safe, affordable day camp program providing academic support for Edmonds school -aged children and their families • Basics: o Frances Anderson Center/pods ■ 9 rooms in FAC can provide 6-foot distancing between children and staff ■ Pods formed for a week, isolated from each other and building tenants Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 19 Packet Pg. 66 7.1.a ■ 10:1 child/staff ratio ■ Gymnasium = flex space ■ 2nd - 6th grade ■ 7 am - 6 pm/pods 8:30 am - 4:30 pm ■ Day camp/recreation activities ■ Academic support - Monitoring ESD distance learning program - WiFi in building ■ 100 participant capacity ■ $300 resident/$345 non-resident weekly fee ■ 20% of participants full waiver Edmonds Schools/Child Care o Edmonds Opportunities ■ Edmonds area 2" d - 6th grade population: 3,052 ■ 8 elementary and 2 middle schools in city limits o ESD/Program Sessions ■ Benchmark decision point for ESD education model - November 12, 2020 - February 3, 2021 - April 14, 2021 Edmonds School District Distance Learning/Child Care o District has partnered with four childcare providers (MLT/Kids Krew, YMCA, Boys & Girls Club and Right At School) that will expand programming and utilize district facilities during remote learning ■ Edmonds: Chase Lake Elementary - YMCA o Edmonds is not a licensed daycare provider ■ Licensing is facility dependent and Frances Anderson Center does not qualify as licensed daycare facility ■ State law allows Parks & Recreation departments to operate day camp programs year- round. • LEAP - Program Comparison Cit /Or anization Ages Weekl Rate Hours Notes Edmonds/LEAP 2" d-6th $300 $345 lam - 6 pm Fee: resident/non-resident MLT/Kids Krew K-6th $255 $275 6:30 am-6:30 pm Fee resident/non-resident YMCA/Chase Lake Elem. 5-12 years $275 $325 7:30am-5:30pm Fee: member/non-member Youth mem $47/mo Boys & Girls Club K-66 $175 $175 6 am-7 pin Membership (annual) $50 Right At School 1st_6th $180 $300 9 am-3pm 7 am-5 pin Before/Aftercare $60 each for 5 days Grow With Us Childcare 5-12 years $183 $283 6 am-6pm Additional activity fees ($40-100) Lynnwood 12 pm-5:30 pm Outdoors, not supporting distance learning LEAP - Staff positions o Two positions ■ Recreation Leader II (new) ■ Recreation Leader - General (revised) ■ 18 FTE (9 rooms/2 staff) ■ 4 PTE (AM/PM program, assist) o Hiring freeze 0 1/2 to 1/3 of staff hired for program will be recreation staff that was laid off or working at significantly decreased hours Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 20 Packet Pg. 67 7.1.a o Program expenses can be covered by program fees o Due to uncertainty of ESD distance learning model and duration, staff initially hired as temporary full-time without benefits o Once ESD's programming is known at November benchmark, if program continues temporary staff converted to full-time with benefits which increases salary costs by 31 % o If registration not at 100% capacity, lack of participants will reduce staffing need and related costs that week o Program implementation based on program need LEAP — Budget 2020 Recreation Division Budget Revenue Budget Revenue YE Est Difference Rec Division $1,111,012 $305,135 $805,877 LEAP Revenue $288,000 Expense Budget Expense YE Estimate Difference Rec Division $1,930,922 $1,423,800 $507,122 LEAP Expenditures $251,368 o Within 2020 Recreation Division Budget, no budget amendment needed LEAP — Budget Program Budget Monthly Rate 9-Month Program % Revenue 80 participants @ $300 (20 participants full waiver) $96,000 $864,000 Revenue TOTAL $96,000 $864,000 Expenditures Start Up Costs (staff training, equipment) $2,505 $22,548 3% Staffing Costs $84,394 $759,542 92% (1) Recreation Coordinator (.75) (9) Recreation Leader II (9) Recreation Leader (4) Recreation (PT) Other (supplies, WiFi, reg processing fees) $5,080 1 $45,720 6% Expenditure TOTAL $91,979 $827,810 BALANCE $4,021 $36,190 Cost neutral ■ Researching grant funding, community partners and other resources Councilmember L. Johnson commented this is exciting and she commended everyone involved in the creation of LEAP. This represents a creative, best use of City resources and working to serve a wider range of citizens, particularly those most in need, exactly why she chose to serve the City of Edmond. As a result of casual conversations with those involved in addressing community needs, she learned childcare is a huge need and one that many people are scrambling to figure out. She viewed the program as helping parents who might otherwise not be able to work or have to make the choice of leaving kids at home in order to work and it gives kids a safe place to go, creates jobs within the community, and restarts recreation programming. The situation is ever -evolving and needs, options and potential funding options are moving targets. She expressed interest in having staff look at additional funding options to expand the program beyond 2020. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 21 Packet Pg. 68 COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXTEND TO 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Ms. Feser for the presentation and for answering his questions via email over the weekend. He referred to upfront costs associated with WiFi and other elements of setting up rooms to ensure health and safety guidelines are followed. If kids go back to school earlier than planned, such as if ESD decides in November to have kids return to school in January, he asked if consideration had been given to how the resources the City purchased could be repurposed. Ms. Feser estimated $12,000- $15,000 would be associated with WiFi, the City is still awaiting a bid, and that cost is reimbursable by CARES finding. WiFi is a beneficial in the facility now and into the future regardless of programming. Other upfront costs include safety equipment such as sanitizer dispensers in each room; those are needed in the facility when it is reopened to the public in Phase 3 when programming resumes. She envisioned even in Phases 3 and 4, safety protocols will continue for years and that equipment will continue to be used. There are enough tables and chairs and basic equipment; other upfront costs include things like surge protectors which can be used for programming in those rooms in the future. She summarized the startup costs are minimal, the largest amount is the week of training of staff estimated at $18,000. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern about the lack of information in the packet; this goes way beyond two job descriptions. Although she thought this was a great idea, she wanted a full cost analysis in next week's packet. Two lead positions will be hired, but it also includes hiring 18 full-time and 4 part-time staff. Council has not been updated on CARES funding. She thanked Ms. Feser for answering her emailed questions. She questioned whether LEAP was really revenue neutral or were there costs associated with hiring and providing benefits after four months. Ms. Feser offered to provide additional information in next week's packet. The plan is to not provide benefits for the first five months and to provide benefits for the following four months. The cost of staffing for nine months was averaged over each month, understanding that revenue will be built up in the frontend to cover the backend. The numbers are broken down into the first five months and the final four; there is a surplus in the beginning but not in the end. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the calculation used revenue from residents and non-residents. Ms. Feser answered to be conservative, the program was budgeted as if all attendees were residents ($300/week). The non-resident fee is 15% higher or $345; every non-resident is more buffer into the budget. Staff is uncertain there will be 100 kids the first week; when numbers begin to increase, registration preference will be given to residents (for example, up to a certain number of days prior, residents get priority). Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the school board members has been consulted and if ESD will provide any financial assistance. Ms. Feser answered she has not had an opportunity to meet with school board members, but there was a very good meeting with an individual from ESD Family Support Services where staff inquired about a WiFi hub and whether the FAC could be a stop for food services. They learned a hub would not work well in the Frances Anderson Center and families who qualify actually pick-up a week's supply of food once a week. Staff is trying to be creative and research other funding sources such as a CDBG Phase 2 grant that may work for this program, OSPI may assist with certified teachers as staff, and CARES funding for hard costs. She summarized programs and available funding is changing weekly; she anticipated more funding would become available because childcare will be the next phase of taking care of families. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember L. Johnson about including a scenario in the cost analysis about expanding the program. Council President Pro Tem Paine commented this is exciting and she was pleased to have something for families and students. As a former school board member, education and linking it to the community is important. She encouraged staff to look at grant opportunities including through OSPI. It would be great to keep this program as revenue neutral as possible from the General Fund in view of future unknowns. She Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 22 Packet Pg. 69 7.1.a suggested looking at Title 1 funds to ensure those are available as well as the use of certificated teachers. She also wanted to ensure the disabled community and accessibility were included. Councilmember Olson said she reached out to the school board to see if what the City was proposing would meet the needs and deficits that will not be covered in the distance learning format but did not receive a specific answer. She knew there was a great need in the community for programs like this and was excited Edmonds was rising to the challenge to meet the need. She relayed frustration to have this on the agenda as an action item and only learning about it on Friday, providing only four days, two of which were weekend days, to study it. It was a miss to schedule it as an action item and she was glad that had been corrected. Councilmember Olson said it sounds like some of the safety things have been worked out, but the Council should not be expected to make a good decision on a two-day turnaround for the Council. A question raised by a citizen today pointed out how important it was for Council to get all relevant information in the agenda packet. She personally found it highly relevant that there would be a $15,000 investment in internet service for the Frances Anderson Center and although it is CARES reimbursable, it is still taxpayer money. She now sees that as a potential long term benefit for the facility and not paying for it out of the City's budget is a win for the community. If staff has been working on this for a month, the committee of whole earlier this month would have been an opportunity for the Council to hear about the concept and provide time to seek information from citizens and stakeholders like the school board. Councilmember K. Johnson reinforced the direction given; topics should always be discussion item when the Council is seeing it for the first time and there should be a complete packet. Council should not have to rely on slides for important information especially data -rich information like costs. The first she heard about this was in a press release from the City's public information officer; the Council should be informed before a press release. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas cautioned Councilmember K. Johnson against making allegations; Ms. Feser contacted or left messages for all Councilmembers. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, TO EXTEND TO 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember K. Johnson said she had not been contacted; she read about it in a press release and then the packet was not complete. Mayor Pro Tem. Fraley-Monillas relayed her understanding that everyone was contacted in advance. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said she learned about his when Ms. Feser called her. This is a very important thing for Edmonds to do, recognizing that people living check -to -check really need this. As a parent, she had no idea what she would do if she had to work full or part time and had to teach her child at home. She expressed support for the program, finding it important, it sets apart the different when it comes to a racial divide; people of color tend to live in the poorer areas of Edmonds and she gave the Parks Department huge kudos for talking about people who need that level of service. Some people do not have a choice about working or not, they do not live in white privilege and live in the real world and need to be able to work and know their kids are taken care of. She supported moving forward with this program, especially since it was cost neutral and more information would be provided next week. Even if the program cost something, it is a value to Edmonds' citizens. She thanked Ms. Feser for the work she has done on this. Councilmember L. Johnson expressed appreciation for the creativity and the quick work that has been done, understanding that Ms. Feser needed to wait to see what ESD planned to do before moving forward. As a very safety minded person, all her concerns had been addressed such as isolating, pickup/drop off, flexibility for a 11 hour time period, and the low adult to child ratio. If she had young children that needed childcare, this program would be top of her list. She understood the need for a quick turnaround and appreciated Ms. Feser's generosity in answering questions and sending responses to Councilmembers' questions to all Councilmembers. She was excited about the program and to continue the discussion next Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 23 Packet Pg. 70 7.1.a week. She requested staff look into other funding options. Ms. Feser answered staff is constantly looking at other funding sources and will include that information next week. As the purpose was to help parents get back to work especially those who are most in need, Councilmember L. Johnson was interested in exploring every options for covering the fees in part or in full. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out only 100 kids will be served by the program with is only 3.3% of the 3,000 students in this age category. She suggested putting that into context to understand that while it is a great program, it is only a piece of the puzzle. 8. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS Due to late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. :� W EV01:i6Y41110V 1018 Biel K" Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas advised she did not have an opportunity to talk about the 100t' anniversary of women's right to vote last week, an important thing to memorialize. As an active member of the League of Women Voters, it is important to understand that what has happened in the last 100 years has been remarkable. She congratulated the League of Women Voters for pushing forward on women's right to vote. iD�0111I]etoIW4117ulu1DMeIK Council President Pro Tern Paine relayed she was pleased to see that CARES funds have been distributed to businesses and to the Edmonds Food Bank. With regard to the emergency response update, HR Director Neill Hoyson is taking over that process and staff will put the finishing touches on it before it comes to Council on September 15t''. She gave a shout out to the Housing Commission who are still meeting, doing yeoman's work and sticking to the timeline. Their diligence will serve the City well. Even after the Housing Commission makes its recommendation, there will be a laundry list of things that will need to be done related to housing issues in Edmonds. Councilmember L. Johnson wished her husband a Happy 47t' Birthday and hoped he enjoyed the birthday pizza their kids provided. She urged the public to wear marks and help us get out of this. Councilmember Buckshnis requested the memorandum from Shane Hope regarding sign code enforcement in residential zones dated 8/24/20 be added to the minutes. The memo explains a lot about the residential code and the misunderstanding that happened last week. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas agreed. [Memo is attached to the end of the minutes.] Councilmember Buckshnis announced there is a pop-up blood drive at the ECA through Thursday. Donors can visit the Bloodworks Northwest website to sign up. She requested an update on the CARES funding. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas advised Finance will send out an update. Councilmember Olson pointed out women of color got the right to vote in 1965 which was only 55 years ago. She announced there are several open board and commission positions including on the Economic Development Commission. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out the U.S. Census deadline is September 30. The census was established by the U.S. Constitution and is taken every 10 years. It provides vital information that informs how public funds will be used for hospitals, schools, transportation and other publicly funded programs. Based on this head county, $657 billion is allocated to states and local governments. The fastest and easiest way to complete the census is online. In addition, census employees are going door-to-door to enumerate people who have not participated in the survey. It is important to count everyone such as communities of Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 24 Packet Pg. 71 7.1.a color and undocumented immigrants. All census data on a personal level is anonymous and not shared with any federal agency. There are only 10 questions; it can be filled out online or by calling 844-330-2020. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember K. Johnson formally requested that the Council President put on the agenda Scott Passey's proposed procedures for Council discussion. That would be a great starting point to understand how to conduct business. She also requested the City Council review the Mayor's Main Street closure to include an opportunity to review the possible alternatives and impacts for persons needing parking and for businesses that do not serve food or drink. She asked the Mayor and HR Director to brief the Council on the steps being taken and the timelines to fill the acting police chief and the acting finance director positions. She would also like the City Council to review the 2020 budget including all the COVID-19 impacts. She requested a review of the Mayor's emergency powers as it was something the Council needed to be briefed on and evaluated. Councilmember Distelhorst mentioned women's suffrage, the 19' amendment and last week's 100t' anniversary. He urged he public to continue to wear masks and follow the guidelines. Numbers are trending down a bit which is the time to be hyper vigilant. 11. ADJOURN COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Council meeting was adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 25 Packet Pg. 72 7.1.a Public Comment for 8/25/20 City Council Meeting: From: Darrol Haug Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 1:17 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Comment on Day Care Proposal Day Care and City: Program for 2nd_61h grade kids at FAC. Designed to support the kids with online work for school. The job descriptions do little to assure that you would hire people equipped to do that help. Program open from 7am to 6pm. Lots of time to help the kids with their on line work. Do you have enough properly located internet capacity where you plan to house the kids? The job descriptions specifically exclude High School students that could help in this work. They know all about online learning for they will be doing their own work. Many of these students already baby sit this same age group. If you do not support online learning you will be counter to what the kids need during those hours. When the senior center closed some programs moved to a FAC. We know how to manage space for social distancing for any age groups, kids or seniors. Our seniors are "locked" up in their homes the city needs to consider how to get our seniors back at life. If FAC can be opened for kids we should find a way to open it for seniors first! Dealing with 2nd -6th graders is a worthy one. ESD has already opened some of their schools to other "day care" type operators and if the city wants to help in this effort here is a way that can work for all. The city plan is designed to be revenue neutral, cost match revenues. Go to ESD and ask to use some of their buildings that are not slated of one of the other day care centers. Use that space. Kids and parents would be closer to home and ESD already has a plan to manage that space with social distancing in mind. Same City program just a better location. They have already wired the entire building for internet and the district could also be convinced to bring in some HS students to do the kid assist stuff and their own work. The district has the resources to even pay a stipend to the HS students to help. They could even give credit for the work! Bottom line. The city has an interesting program, but it could be better for all if it is locating in schools and not FAC. Then we can get adults out and about more and get them reengaged with life outside their homes and decks and patios. Decks and patios will be closed soon, and we will force seniors to be fully locked up again. Let's get creative about this program and make it a win win for everyone: City, kids, and Seniors! Respectfully, Darrol Haug From: Ken Reidy Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 7:18 AM Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 26 Packet Pg. 73 7.1.a To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson@edmondswa.gov>; Judge, Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Passey, Scott <Scott.Passey@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Public Comments for August 25, 2020 City Council meeting -remember all persons attending the meeting must be able to hear each other at the same time The June 2, 2015 City Council Meeting video is a window into our City government. The video shows: 1. Despite citizen interest and citizen public comment provided BEFORE the meeting, five Councilmembers simply chose to openly violate RCW 36.70A.390. 2. Council President Fraley-Monillas stated immediately before the vote that "seeing that it serves no purpose to vote against, I'm going to vote for it". 3. Councilmember Bloom abstained because RCW 36.70A.390 required a Public Hearing within 60 days. 4. Following the violation of State Law, the City Council Meeting moved forward to the next item on the agenda, adoption of the Code of Ethics. 5. Immediately after the Code of Ethics topic was introduced, Council President Fraley-Monillas made a motion to adopt a different Code of Ethics than the one scheduled for discussion. 6. The reading of an email from Councilmember Buckshnis, absent that evening, which stated "I have always been of the opinion to start small and I liked what both Strom and Adrienne put forth — so let's just march on." The Code of Ethics moved by Council President Fraley-Monillas, however, was not the document that both Strom and Adrienne had "put forth". Packet page 139 of the June 2, 2015 Council Packet shows that on April 30, 2015, Council President Fraley-Monillas had redlined the following from the version she preferred: -Follow Washington statutes, city ordinances or regulations in the course of performing duties. Strom's last day on Council was in early January, 2015. As such, he played no role in removing "Follow Washington statutes, city ordinances or regulations in the course of performing duties" from the proposed Code of Ethics. On June 3, 2015, 1 emailed full Council that RCW 36.70A.390 was violated at the previous night's Council Meeting. I asked: Will there be any accountability related to Council's illegal conduct? I said that I also considered Council's conduct very unethical. I asked: Who is charged with enforcing the new Code of Ethics? Council President Fraley-Monillas forwarded my email to Mayor Earling at 12:08:44 PM on June 3, 2015 along with the following representation: "This is why storm and I put this together this way........" Again, Strom's last day on City Council was in early January, 2015. As such, he played no role in removing "Follow Washington statutes, city ordinances or regulations in the course of performing duties" from the Code of Ethics. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 27 Packet Pg. 74 7.1.a Please add "Follow Washington statutes, city ordinances or regulations in the course of performing duties" to the City's Code of Ethics. Better yet, please discuss what the 2015 City Council was supposed to discuss on June 3, 2015: Discussion and potential action regarding draft code of ethics, Attachment 16. Review of Options A,B,C and D. From: Sonja Dwyer Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 1:57 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Paid parking To Whom It May Concern: I recently read an article in My Edmonds news regarding a land use action proposal for paid parking lots that are currently free. I strongly urge you to not allow this. Downtown businesses are struggling to stay afloat during this pandemic and reducing free parking spots will simply make matters worse. Many people are struggling financially but want to support local businesses so they make sacrifices to go get something to eat or support non -restaurant businesses. If people have to also pay for parking, that extra cost might be the deciding factor between supporting local business and not. Also, the closure of streets on the weekends has been good for eating establishments but hard for other stores since it eliminates so many parking spots. Paid parking is going to make this even more of a struggle. Maybe consider this in a few years after we have hopefully economically recovered from this pandemic. Until then, please don't make things harder for everyone. Thank you. Sincerely, Sonja Dwyer Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 28 Packet Pg. 75 7.1.a August 24, 2020 Memo To: City Council From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director Subject: Sign Code Enforcement in Residential Zones Questions have come up recently about the City of Edmonds code regarding signage in single- family residential districts and how the codes are enforced. The information below addresses this. CODE REQUIREMENTS Many different City regulations apply to signage, depending on location and other factors. For an individual residence in a single-family residential (RS) zoning district, the City's code allows one freestanding sign, up to a maximum size of 4 square feet in area and up to a maximum height of 6 feet. CODE ENFORCEMENT The City of Edmonds encompasses eight square miles, with thousands of different regulations about a wide variety of topics (not just signs) that apply throughout the City. The City employs one full-time staff person for enforcement of the Edmonds Community Development Code. City staff must make choices about how to best prioritize enforcement of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Generally, a top priority for the City is dealing with any imminent safety or health issue per the City code. Sometimes the City may act on a code violation of significant concern about which no one has previously complained. It is also common to have an alleged code complaint violation reported by a local resident. All complaints are investigated. If a violation is found, the responsible party will be contacted by City staff about the nature of the alleged violation. Education, combined with voluntary compliance, is the City's preferred means of code enforcement. If voluntary compliance does not occur, the City may take further action to enforce the code requirements as time and resources allow. The City exercises some discretion in prioritizing and implementing enforcement efforts. A sign in a residential district that exceeds the size limits may not be the highest priority for active City enforcement, especially since the violation does not appear to be a safety/health issue and may be of a somewhat temporary nature. Furthermore, enforcement of the sign code requires an extra level of caution and deliberation compared to, for example, the building code, because the City needs to ensure that any sign code enforcement action is within the bounds of the First Amendment. CURRENT ISSUE A current issue has come up that follows a resident's complaint of an oversized sign on a neighboring property. The City's code enforcement officer first notified the neighboring owner in a letter dated July 7 that the sign did not appear to comply with the sign size limits of that zone and identified a date of July 15 to come into compliance. Unfortunately, that letter used an outdated letterhead template that had the former Mayor's name, not the current Mayor's name, and contained typographical errors. After the letter had been mailed, I saw a copy and noticed Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 29 Packet Pg. 76 7.1.a the typing/formatting errors and that the letter seemed to set a very short time period to correct the situation, especially since the letter would have been in the mail two or three days of that period. The errors and short correction window led me to direct the code enforcement officer to send a second letter to apologize for the typos and to cancel the prior timeline. Because the initial timeline was almost up, I had him deliver the letter in person. Shortly after, the original complainant about the sign contacted me and indicated the neighborhood concerns went beyond the sign. I had a zoom meeting on August 6 with several households to learn more. As part of that discussion, I noted that a third letter would be sent in the near future to provide a date for sign code compliance. Meanwhile, the City has been working to address various code issues. During this period, I also consulted with the City Attorney about the alleged sign code violation and any First Amendment concerns. On August 21, a third letter about the sign was sent to the property owner. It repeated that the yard sign did not appear to comply with sign size and height for this zoning district and identified a due date of September 15 for correction. It also suggested there could be an opportunity on the property to have a smaller sign, consistent with the code. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 25, 2020 Page 30 Packet Pg. 77 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #243763 through #243864 dated August 27, 2020 for $1,479,187.35 (re -issued check #243842 $162.50) and wire payments of $1,170.03 & $417.67. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 08-27-20 wire 08-27-20 wire 08-31-20 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 08-27-20 Packet Pg. 78 7.2.a vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun vi 243763 8/27/2020 071634 ALLSTREAM 17010729 C/A 768328 (D PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service E 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 1,177.6z a Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.7E '3 Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.6� Total: 1,199.11 Y 243764 8/27/2020 001528 AM TEST INC 117087 WWTP: SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-AO( t SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-A0011290-1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 335.0( 117088 WWTP: SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-AO( SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-A0011583-1 p 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 130.0( Ta 117117 WWTP:SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-A00 p SAMPLE NUMBERS: 20-A0012363-1 a 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 125.0( Q Total : 590.0( c N 243765 8/27/2020 070976 AMERESCO INC 8 WWTP: THRU 6/30/20 FINAL DESIG ti THRU 6/30/20 FINAL DESIGN SERA N ao 423.100.76.594.39.41.00 86,554.3z N Total: 86,554.3' E 243766 8/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991869423 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS U FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E E 10.4% Sales Tax t 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0, 1991878818 WWTP: 8/19/20 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Q Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 51.4E Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1 ' 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.4' Page: 1 Packet Pg. 79 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243766 8/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.3E E 10.4% Sales Tax a 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.1E 1991878819 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 3 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 61.4; 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 Y 6.3E 1991878820 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0; o 1991884167 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS �a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS o L 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- 0- PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS Q 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' c PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS N 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS c 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS E 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1 u PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS }; 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0E 10.4% Sales Tax E t 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1; 10.4% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6z 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6z 10.4% Sales Tax Page: 2 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243766 8/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 1991884168 243767 8/27/2020 078021 B JAVADZADEH & A BUTTERFIELD 4-20450 243768 8/27/2020 078018 BATALI ASSOCIATES 243769 8/27/2020 002258 BENS EVER READY 243770 8/27/2020 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 0826202013atali 19386 762040 7.2.a Page: 3 PO # Description/Account Amoun 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.61 y 10.4% Sales Tax E 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.61 a 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6" .3 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� N FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( 10.4% Sales Tax E 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9 j 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.9E o Total: 258.2f 0 #20-4658WA UTILITY REFUND a #20-4658WA Utility refund due to Q 411.000.233.000 122.7� " Total : 122.7 N ti CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT N ao CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 5,000.0( E Total : 5,000.0( .� 2020 ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHEF 2020 ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHEF 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 685.0( t 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 71.2z Q Total : 756.2z UNIT 681 PARTS/ LAMP AS UNIT 681 PARTS/ LAMP AS Page: 3 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243770 8/27/2020 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 243771 8/27/2020 076741 BLOSSMAN SERVICES INC 243772 8/27/2020 067947 BROWNELLS INC 243773 8/27/2020 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.1 % Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : SO0043742 UNIT 99 - PARTS/ FUEL CAP Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 99 - PARTS/ FUEL CAP 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 19663520.00 INV 19663520 - EDMONDS PD 7/8 SQUARE PATCHES 100/PK 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 2 - PLASTIC GUN BOX 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 LYMAN SIDE SADDLE SHELL HOLD 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 COTTON APPLICATORS 1000/PK 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 RIFLE BORE SNAKE 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 PISTOL BORE SNAKE 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Total 94687276 E9DC.MATERIALS E9DC.Materials 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 10.0% Sales Tax 7.2.a Page: 4 Page: 4 Packet Pg. 82 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243773 8/27/2020 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY (Continued) 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 54.6( ED 94693325 E9DC.MATERIALS E E9DC.Materials ca 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 a 546.0( 10.0% Sales Tax 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 54.6( 94713603 STREET - 7TH & BELL GRAVEL & E, STREET - 7TH & BELL GRAVEL & E, 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 311.0( u 10.0% Sales Tax t 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 31.1E U Total: 1,543.31 243774 8/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 21795153 INV 21795153 - EDMONDS PD o 8/20- CONTRACT CHARGE IR6255 '@ 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.8 1 o 7/20- CLR METER USAGE IRC5240) a 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 179.2z Q 7/20 - BW METER USAGE IR6255 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 16.1 , N 8/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE IRC332 ti N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.7( o0 8/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE IRC524 c N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 160.0( E 7/20 - BW METER USAGE IRC5240E @ 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 16.1 , 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.7.E E 21795155 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 209.6E Q B&W Meter usage IRC5250 7/01/20 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 23.8( Color Meter usage IRC5250 7/01/20 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 73.4( Page: 5 Packet Pg. 83 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243774 8/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 6 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 31.9( E 21795156 CONTRACT CHARGE/METER USAC a conract charges/meter usage 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 547.2� 3 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 56.9< 21795157 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 a� 275.9� 21795158 CANON 5250 E Contract charge August 2020 M 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 167.6� Contract charge August 2020 0 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 20.9( �a Contract charge August 2020 0 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 20.9E a bw meter usage July 2020 Q 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 3.8E c bw meter usage July 2020 N 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.4£ N bw meter usage July 2020 c 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.4£ clr meter usage July 2020 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 40.6z 2 clr meter usage July 2020 }; 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 5.0£ clr meter usage July 2020 E t 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 5.0£ 10.4% Sales Tax Q 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 22.0E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 2.7E 10.4% Sales Tax Page: 6 Packet Pg. 84 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 7 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243774 8/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.7,' 21795160 CANON 2501 F E contract charge August 2020 Q 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.41 bw meter usage July 2020 3 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 1.6z clr meter usage 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 12.6z N 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 a� 4.2< 21795161 BLDG DEPT COPIER -MONTHLY CO E Bldg Dept Copier: August 2020 and J 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 34.3< 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 3.5, Ta 21795162 PLANNING MONTHLY COPIER o Planning Monthly Copier- L a 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 45.0- Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 c 4.61 N 21795163 P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' c~.i P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' c 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 91.5z N 21795164 PARK MAINT IRC2501F COPIER COI E PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi 2 U 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 132.0( }; 21795165 FLEET COPIER Fleet Copier E 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 54.8E 0 10.4% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 5.7- 21795166 CONTRACT CHARGE/METER USAC contract charges/meter usage 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 17.1; Page: 7 Packet Pg. 85 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 8 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243774 8/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax (D 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 1.7� E 21795167 COUNCIL CANON MONTHLY CHART a CANON Copier Monthly lease 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 26.4, 3 B/W meter usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 1.0- Color Meter usage Y 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 5.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.4£ E 21795168 21795168 - EDMONDS PD 8/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE IRC555 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 185.71 o 7/20 - BW METER USAGE IRC5550I �a 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 11.5( o 7/20- CLR METER USAGE IRC5550I a a 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 89.2E Q 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 29.7� N 21795169 WATER SEWER COPIER N Water Sewer Copier c 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 65.4z N Water Sewer Copier E 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 65.4z 10.4% Sales Tax }; 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 6.8, 10.4% Sales Tax E t 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 6.8( 21795170 PW ADMIN COPIER PW Office Copier for Q 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 81.6z PW Office Copier for 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 46.2E Page: 8 Packet Pg. 86 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243774 8/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 243775 8/27/2020 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi PW Office Copier for 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 46.2E E PW Office Copier for a 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 32.6E PW Office Copier for 3 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 32.6E PW Office Copier for 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 32.6E Y 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 8.4� 10.4% Sales Tax E 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 4.8' 'sa 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 4.8' O 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 3.4( o 10.4% Sales Tax a 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 3.4( Q 10.4% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 3.3E 21795171 INV 21795171 - EDMONDS PD N 8/20 CONTRACT CHARGE-FAXBOA c 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.0, 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 3.7E U 21799134 DEV SVCS MONTLY COPIER Dev Svcs Monthly Copier- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 555.2' E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 57.7E Q 4,042.9E : 009 STATE LOBBYIST AUGUST 2020 State Lobbyist August 2020 Page: 9 Packet Pg. 87 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243775 8/27/2020 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC (Continued) 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 Tota I : 243776 8/27/2020 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP 7465 PROF SVCS Consulting Svcs for Housing Commis 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total 243777 8/27/2020 077735 CENTRAL PAVING LLC 141424 CENTRAL PAVING HYDRANT DEPO CENTRAL PAVING HYDRANT DEPO 421.000.245.110 Total 243778 8/27/2020 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY292728 WWTP: PO 374 - CARBON MONOX CARBON MONOXIDE, OXYGEN, NP 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 RN07200956 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Tota I : 243779 8/27/2020 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 120004273 WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 120004300 120004300 - EDMONDS PD 2020 SHARE OF TRAINING COST 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Tota I : 243780 8/27/2020 078010 CLEMENT, ANDREA 2005595.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( 7.2.a Page: 10 Page: 10 Packet Pg. 88 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 11 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243780 8/27/2020 078010 CLEMENT, ANDREA (Continued) REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 60.0( Tota I : 60.0( 243781 8/27/2020 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC RO43324 UNIT 438 - DEDUCTIBLE FOR REPA UNIT 438 - DEDUCTIBLE FOR REPA 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 1,000.0( Total : 1,000.0( 243782 8/27/2020 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-LI924 NEW 2020 FORD W9C TRANSIT CA 2020 Ford W9C Transit Cargo 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 34,045.0( 8.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2,859.7E Total : 36,904.71 243783 8/27/2020 077744 DELIBERATE DYNAMICS INC 4807 INV 4807 - EDMONDS PD - HWANG LOWA INNOX PRO GTX BOOTS 001.000.41.521.26.24.00 200.0( 4831 INV 4831 - EDMONDS PD - ARVAN LOWA INNOX PRO BOOTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 200.0( 4851 INV 4851 - EDMONDS PD - PECK LOWA INNOX PRO BOOTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 199.7E Tota I : 599.7' 243784 8/27/2020 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 20-4030 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 8/18 council meeting minutes for 8/18/20 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 453.6( Total : 453.6( 243785 8/27/2020 074296 DREYER, ANN 2005603.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 140.0( Page: 11 Packet Pg. 89 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243785 8/27/2020 074296 074296 DREYER, ANN (Continued) Total : 140.0( 243786 8/27/2020 078016 DUNKINSON, SARAH 2O05607.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( E E REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( �' �a 001.000.239.200 170.0( Total : 170.0( .- 3 243787 8/27/2020 007253 DUNN LUMBER 7390249 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ SCRE c PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ SCRE fd 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 N 159.1 E 10.2% Sales Tax a� 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 t 16.21 Total: 175.4( ,E M 243788 8/27/2020 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 1-108729 CEMETERY: 50/50 COOLANT CEMETERY: 50/50 COOLANT 0 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 10.9� > 10.4% Sales Tax o 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 CL 1.1 z 1-108738 CEMETERY: 12V LAWN MOWER Q 10.4% Sales Tax o 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 7.21 CEMETERY: 12V LAWN MOWER N 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 69.9E o Total: 89.3E E 243789 8/27/2020 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1751 FAC MAINT - DRUM SAND KIT 2 FAC MAINT - DRUM SAND KIT }; 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.9E 10.4% Sales Tax E t 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.9E 1753 PM SUPPLIES: PAINTER TOOL, FAE Q PM SUPPLIES: PAINTER TOOL, FAE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 30.1 E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.11 Page: 12 Packet Pg. 90 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 243789 8/27/2020 076610 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) 243790 8/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-25150 243791 8/27/2020 078011 EKLUND, SUZANNE 243792 8/27/2020 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 2-25175 2-26950 2-28275 2-29118 2-37180 4-34080 2005597.009 296883 7.2.a Page: 13 Description/Account Amoun Total : 43.2: r- WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C m E WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C �a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 75.6z EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 Cj = EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 Cj 3 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 98.4( c LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ N LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ Y 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 107.6E PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 93.8E LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / o LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / '@ 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 52.8f o SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER £ a SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER £ Q- Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 73.9E " LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' N LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' ti 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 N 52.8E ao Total : 555.2< N REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 400.0( Total: 400.0( t PARK MAINTENANCE: PARTS �a PARK MAINTENANCE: PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 197.3' Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 20.5< Total : 217.8E Page: 13 Packet Pg. 91 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 14 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243793 8/27/2020 073133 EVERGREEN RURAL WATER OF WA WESTON WESTON- 2020 FALL CONFERENCI WESTON- 2020 FALL CONFERENCI (D 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 200.0( E Total: 200.0( a 243794 8/27/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0897153 WATER - 2" METER FOR 7929 236T L WATER - 2" METER FOR 7929 236T 3 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 344.8E 10.4% Sales Tax N 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 35.8E U 0908336 WATER - INVENTORY 0577 WATER - INVENTORY 0577 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 4,828.9E •� 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 502.2' p Total: 5,711.81, 243795 8/27/2020 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 8482083 WWTP: PO #355 DIUELEC UNION, I o a PO #355 DIUELEC UNION, WROTE Q- Q 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 93.6E 10.4% Sales Tax N 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.7E ti Total: 103.41 00 0 243796 8/27/2020 075871 FLOW TECHNOLOGIES INC 1273 ESJB.EXTRA DAY OF LINING TO CC N E ESJB.Extra Day of Lining to Correct 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 2,953.2( Total: 2,953.2( a� 243797 8/27/2020 078012 FRENCH, MARY 2005598.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: E t REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 276.0( Q Total : 276.0( 243798 8/27/2020 078020 GARRET & MELISSA RENZ 3-53300 #611248122-SK UTILITY REFUND #611248122-SK Utility refund due to Page: 14 Packet Pg. 92 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 15 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243798 8/27/2020 078020 GARRET & MELISSA RENZ (Continued) 411.000.233.000 119.E 1 Total: 119.6, 243799 8/27/2020 078014 GIBSON, JULIE 2005602.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: I REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 1 001.000.239.200 170.0( Total : 170.0( 243800 8/27/2020 012199 GRAINGER 9614129352 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 125.6" 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.0E Total : 138.6E 243801 8/27/2020 078008 GUSTAFSON, SARA 2005593.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 200.0( Tota I : 200.0( 243802 8/27/2020 074804 HARLES, JANINE 527290 PHOTOGRAPHY - AUGUST 2020 Photography for August 2020 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.0( Tota I : 200.0( 243803 8/27/2020 078017 HARVEST SOIL LLC 08262020Harvest CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 8,000.0( Total : 8,000.0( 243804 8/27/2020 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 15546798 SEWER - PARTS SEWER - PARTS 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1,429.1 10.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 142.9, Page: 15 Packet Pg. 93 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243804 8/27/2020 010900 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 243805 8/27/2020 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 243806 8/27/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 16 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 1,572.11 2019-220 TOURISM PROMOTION AND MARKI E E Tourism promotion and marketing for 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 1,666.0( Tourism website maintenance August L 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 200.0( Total: 11866.0( 1091518 PM SUPPLIES: MULTI -USE SPRAYE PM SUPPLIES: MULTI -USE SPRAYE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 t 44.9- 10.2% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.5£ 2053356 PM SUPPLIES: VACUUM, BUCKET, PM SUPPLIES: VACUUM, BUCKET, o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 �a 85.7E o 10.2% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.7. Q 22739 PM SUPPLIES: DECK SCRUB, EXTE PM SUPPLIES: DECK SCRUB, EXTE N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 254.7( ti 10.2% Sales Tax N 00 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 25.9, 3011459 PM SUPPLIES: METAL PRIMER E PM SUPPLIES: METAL PRIMER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.5z 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.8 ' E 4011301 PM SUPPLIES: T-KNIVES, MUD BO) PM SUPPLIES: T-KNIVES, MUD BO) +a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.7' Q 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.3( 4624144 PM SUPPLIES: PVC BUSHING, GLU PM SUPPLIES: PVC BUSHING, GLU Page: 16 Packet Pg. 94 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243806 8/27/2020 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 243807 8/27/2020 061013 HONEY BUCKET Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 17 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.1, ED 10.2% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.1 < a 5024618 PM SUPPLIES: RAPID SET WATER PM SUPPLIES: RAPID SET WATER 3 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 55.4- 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.6E w 5623930 PM SUPPLIES: PVC PARTS PM SUPPLIES: PVC PARTS t 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.9 1 10.2% Sales Tax •@ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.01 U 7621607 PM SUPPLIES: ROTOR SPRINKLER o PM SUPPLIES: ROTOR SPRINKLER 7a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.9� o 10.2% Sales Tax L a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.2z Q Total : 610.6: c N 0551661075 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET N HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET ao 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 644.9E N 0551661076 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET E YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 2 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.6( U 0551661077 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 246.0( 0551661078 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE fd PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE Q 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E 0551661079 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4.E Page: 17 Packet Pg. 95 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 18 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243807 8/27/2020 061013 HONEY BUCKET (Continued) 0551661080 WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I (D WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 221.6E a 0551661081 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B1 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B1 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E 0551661082 MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONEI MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONEI 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,514.1 , 0551661083 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E 0551661084 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON p 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 118.2E �a 0551663079 CITY PARK HONEY BUCKET CREDI o CITY PARK HONEY BUCKET CREDI a 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 -163.4E Q Total : 3,502.9E c N 243808 8/27/2020 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 830456 WWTP: PO 179 8/21/20 SODIUM H` ti PO 179 8/21/20 SODIUM HYPOCHL N ao 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 3,679.0E N WA Hazadous Substance Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 25.7.E 2 10.4% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 382.6, Total: a� 4,087.4; E t 243809 8/27/2020 078019 JOANNE & JONATHAN MA 5-04075 #20-4882WA UTILITY REFUND DUE #20-4882WA Utility refund due to Q 411.000.233.000 252.7z Total : 252.7z 243810 8/27/2020 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC INV-065306 INV-065306 - EDMONDS PD Page: 18 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 19 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243810 8/27/2020 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC (Continued) CALIBRATE/MAINT. TOTAL STATIOI` 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 336.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 34.91 Tota I : 370.9' 243811 8/27/2020 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 08192020-01 INV 08192020-01 - EDMONDS PD JULY 2020 CAR WASH CHARGES 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 157.1 , Total : 157.1 243812 8/27/2020 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 46341 E7MA.SERVICES THRU 3/3/20 E7MA.Services thru 3/3/20 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 6,397.8E E7MA.Services thru 3/3/20 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 3,607.4E E7MA.Services thru 3/3/20 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 5,411.1 Total : 15,416.5( 243813 8/27/2020 075474 LEACH, JENNIFER 8/5/2020 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAINING 1 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 40.0( Total : 40.0( 243814 8/27/2020 077533 LENCO ARMORED VEHICLES 17314 INV 17314 G3 BEARCAT - SWAT 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 2,359.1 E Freight 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 166.7< 10.4% Sales Tax 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 245.3E Total : 2,771.2' 243815 8/27/2020 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER September Cigna SEPTEMBER CIGNA PREMIUMS Page: 19 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243815 8/27/2020 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER (Continued) September Cigna Premiums 811.000.231.550 13,397.3E Total: 13,397.31 243816 8/27/2020 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 037657 02 PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 691.2, 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 71.8� 039251 01 PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 138.4E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.4( Total: 915.95 243817 8/27/2020 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC D0093916 PUBLIC SAFETY - PAINT PUBLIC SAFETY - PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 49.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.2E E0126480 LIBRARY - PAINT LIBRARY - PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 77.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.1' Total : 141.3( 243818 8/27/2020 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 87366 INV 87366 - EDMONDS PD - CS 20-' TOW CADILLAC- CS 20-19225 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 184.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.1 Total : 203.1 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243819 8/27/2020 076177 MCKINSTRY LOCKBOX 243820 243821 243822 243823 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 2020-157A 2020-157G 8/27/2020 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0249670 8/27/2020 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 8/27/2020 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 8/27/2020 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS 0250104 17505 333394 25536 PO # Description/Account FACILITIES - CITY ENERGY UPGRA FACILITIES - CITY ENERGY UPGRA 001.000.66.518.30.41.10 FACILITIES - CITY ENERGY UPGRA FACILITIES - CITY ENERGY UPGRA 001.000.66.518.30.41.10 Total E172SO - PARTS E172SO - PARTS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 E174PO - PARTS/ UNIVERSAL GUN E174PO - PARTS/ UNIVERSAL GUN 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Total PROF SVCS-DEV SVCS Document and Large format scanninc 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 Total PM SUPPLIES: CHAIN LOOP, FUEL PM SUPPLIES: CHAIN LOOP, FUEL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total YOST - ROOF CLEANING, REPAIRS YOST - ROOF CLEANING, REPAIRS 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 7.2.a Page: 21 Amoun m 32,230.2, E R a d 11,476.0E '3 43,706.3, c �a N Y 406.9E 42.3, •� v 0 300.7E 0 31.2E a 781.3E Q 0 N ti 1,266.0< C 1,266.W y E 49.9E a� 5.2( t 55.1 f a 795.0( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 243823 8/27/2020 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 25537 243824 8/27/2020 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC 20-2775.00-5 243825 8/27/2020 077893 NANCY'S NAILS 08262020NancyNails 243826 8/27/2020 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 ROOF ON RENTAL HOUSE 20719 81 PW RENTAL HOUSE - 20719 86TH F 422.000.362.60.000.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.362.60.000.00 Total EOGA.SERVICES THRU 7/31/20 EOGA.Services thru 7/31/20 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 Total CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT CARES FUND BUSINESS SUPPORT 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Total 0738038-IN FLEET - OIL & FILTERS FLEET - OIL 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 243827 8/27/2020 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N024780 Total : W WTP: PO 375 HOSE ASSYS PO 375 HOSE ASSYS - will call. Stor, 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total 7.2.a Page: 22 Amoun 82.6E 5D E �a a 410.0( L 42.6z 1,330.3: N U a� t 31,118.9E 31,118.91 .M U 4- 0 M 5,000.0( > 5,000.0( a a Q 0 1,746.2- ti N 42.3, o N 181.6( 4.4( c 1,974.5: E t �a 1,559.2( Q 152.8( 1,712.0( Page: 22 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243828 8/27/2020 078015 ODELL, DEANNE 243829 243830 243831 243832 8/27/2020 077389 OLYMPIC ELEVATOR COMPANY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 2005606.009 10817 8/27/2020 076857 PERFORMANCE INFO TECHNOLOGIES 1678 8/27/2020 073150 POLLARD, ANDREA F 1679 131 8/27/2020 078006 PRESTIGE WINDOW TINTING LLC 3999 7.2.a Page: 23 PO # Description/Account Amoun REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 170.0( E Total: 170.0( a MUSEUM - FIRE RECALL OVERLAY MUSEUM - FIRE RECALL OVERLAY 3 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 28,665.4( 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 2,981.2( Total : 31,646.6( t W WTP: TO 1.2020 7/1-7/31 /20 TO 1. E TO 1.2020 7/1-7/31 /20 TO 1.2020 f6 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 2,340.0( o W WTP: 7/1-7/31 /20 TO 2.2020 '@ 7/1-7/31 /20 TO 2.2020 0 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 2,250.0( a Total : 4,590.0( Q FLAGGER CLASS - WATER, SEWEF N 4 - WATER 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 350.0( N 3- SEWER o 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 262.5( E 1-STREET M 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 87.5( Z Total: 700.0( a� E174PO - INSTALL WINDOW TINT C E t E174PO - INSTALL WINDOW TINT C 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 280.0( Q 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 29.1 Total : 309.1: Page: 23 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243833 8/27/2020 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 243834 8/27/2020 075822 QUADIENT INC 243835 8/27/2020 077635 RALPH, RICHARD 243836 8/27/2020 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 243837 8/27/2020 078013 SCHOUTEN, GRACE 243838 8/27/2020 078009 SEARS, KATHLEEN 243839 8/27/2020 071655 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 24 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220023412418 WWTP:7/22-8/20B METER 00039035 7/22-8/20B METER 000390395 200 1 (D 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 69.9E E Total: 69.9f a 16139439 MAIL MACHINE INK TANK a� L mail machine ink tank 3 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 366.5( 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 38.1 , U Total : 404.6! t 2005605.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( E REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( f6 001.000.239.200 107.5( o Total: 107.5( 53865 E7MA.CONTAMINATED SOIL REMO' o E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal a 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 2,134.6" Q E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal o 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 N 1,203.6" ti E7MA.Contaminated Soil Removal N 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 ao 1,805.4' o Total: 5,143.6: 2005600.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: I U REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: I 001.000.239.200 c 170.0( a) Total: 170.0( E 2005594.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: Q 001.000.239.200 125.0( Total : 125.0( B12133427 JUL-2020 CLOUD SERVICE CHARG Page: 24 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 25 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243839 8/27/2020 071655 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP (Continued) Jul-2020 Cloud Service Charges (D 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 717.4, E, 10.4% Sales Tax a 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 74.6" Total : L 792.W '3 243840 8/27/2020 068132 SHORELINE CONSTRUCTION CO ESJB.Pmt 14 ESJB.SERVICES THRU 7/31/20 c ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 172,917.51 ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 422.000.72.594.31.65.20 170,155.8E ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 E 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 13,209.5( U ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 p 112.000.68.595.61.65.00 26,703.7E ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 0 0 112.000.68.542.30.48.00 L 789.9E m ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 Q' Q 125.000.68.542.30.48.00 788.0( c ESJB.Services thru 7/31/20 N 126.000.68.542.30.48.00 594.0, N Total : 385,158.61, c 243841 8/27/2020 065770 SHORELINE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2005591.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: N E REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 2 001.000.239.200 400.0( U 2005592.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: c REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: E 001.000.239.200 200.0( U Total : 600.0( 2 W a 243842 8/27/2020 077587 SIEBERS, JESSICA 2004830.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL MONTHLY F REFUND: PRESCHOOL MONTHLY F 001.000.239.200 162.5( Page: 25 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243842 8/27/2020 077587 077587 SIEBERS, JESSICA 243843 8/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 26 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 162.5( 200202547 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- m E PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- �a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.0< 200260271 YOST POOL = YOST POOL 3 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 823.1, c 200398956 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; N FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 792.9( 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 164.0E 200611317 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V o LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V '@ 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 108.0E o 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON a OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON Q- Q 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200714038 SEAVIEW PARK N SEAVIEW PARK ti 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 N 14.9� ao 200723021 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 26.4( .m 200739845 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 16.6< E 201197084 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK tea, 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 22.7E Q 201236825 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS FISHING PIER RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 153.0E 201431244 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC Page: 26 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243843 8/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 27 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC (D 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 15.4E E 201551744 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN a SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,300.4< 3 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 38.8 , N 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW t 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 35.1E 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.0< o 201942489 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 7a PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : o L 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 73.4( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Q 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 278.9( c PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; N 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 278.9( N PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; c 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 278.9( N PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 278.9( u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; }; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 278.9( 202250627 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED E 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 �a 15.4E 202291662 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1; Q CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 , 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5,654.0< 202439246 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER Page: 27 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 28 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243843 8/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,785.6� E 202540647 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 a SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 14.3" .3 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 17.8E Y 203097787 WWTP: 7/18-8/14/20 METER 10001 7/18-8/14/20 200 2ND AVE S / METE t 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 25,003.5' 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 125.9; o 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF �a PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 M/ o L 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 52.3E a 220547574 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 Q TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 0 54.3, N Total: 38,846.5( N ao 243844 8/27/2020 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2020-6427 INV 2020-6427 - EDMONDS PD o 285.83 BASE HOUSING @ $103.25 E 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 29,511.9E 2 57.33- BOOKINGS @ $126.97 EA U 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 7,279.1E 67.5 MED SPEC HOUSING @ $59.3; E 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 4,004.71 33.5 - MENTAL HEALTH @ $143.25 fd 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 4,798.8E Q 15.75 - VID COURT HRS @ $199.29 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 3,138.8, 2020-6445 INV 2020-6445 EDMONDS PD - JUL` JULY INMATE PHARMACEUTICALS Page: 28 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243844 8/27/2020 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 243845 243846 243847 243848 8/27/2020 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 2020-6445 CREDIT 77439 8/27/2020 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE 20-026 20-043 8/27/2020 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 90848/4 90922/4 8/27/2020 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 7887 7.2.a Page: 29 PO # Description/Account Amoun 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 31.1( EDMONDS PD - CREDIT FOR MAY,, E CREDIT FOR MAY PHARMACEUTIC ca 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 a -26.0" Total: 48,738.7( 3 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES c PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES y 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,339.0( Total : 1,339.0( 01-20 EMS BILLING & POSTAGE E Q1-20 Ambulance billings & postage E 001.000.39.522.70.41.00 U 16,073.5E o SEPT-2020 FIRE SERVICES CONTF Sept-2020 Fire Services Contract Pa) > 001.000.39.522.20.41.50 614,893.1 - a Total : 630,966.7, Q WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA c WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 199.8( N 10.4% Sales Tax o 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 20.7E E FAC MAINT- WORK WEAR D. HOU! FAC MAINT- WORK WEAR D. HOU! 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 166.1 , 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 17.2E Total: 403.91 SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR AU( Q Social media services for August 202, 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 550.0( Total : 550.0( Page: 29 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 243849 8/27/2020 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 93146 WATER/ SEWER - HATS & BEANIES WATER/ SEWER - HATS & BEANIEE: 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 WATER/ SEWER - HATS & BEANIES 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 93210 WATER/ SEWER - EMBROIDERED I WATER/ SEWER - EMBROIDERED 1 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 WATER/ SEWER - EMBROIDERED 1 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 Total: 243850 8/27/2020 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV58928 PUBLIC WORKS - WATER COOLER PUBLIC WORKS - WATER COOLER 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 INV58990 FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ HANDLE FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ HANDLE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 INV59099 FAC MAINT - REPAIR KITS FAC MAINT - REPAIR KITS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.2.a Page: 30 Amoun m 306.0( E �a a 306.0( L 3 31.& c �a 31.8, Y a� t 76.5( E 76.5( 0 7.9( 0 7.9E a 844.5E Q 0 N ti N 3,148.0E c N 327.4( E 2 U 29.2E E 8.4 1 �a 3.9' Q 277.9, Page: 30 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243850 8/27/2020 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 243851 8/27/2020 066628 THE SUPPLY COMPANY LLC 243852 8/27/2020 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 243853 8/27/2020 076135 TOTAL SATELLITE TV INC 243854 8/27/2020 072800 TOYOTA LIFT NORTHWEST Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total: 00128298 FLEET - HAND SANITIZER/ COVID FLEET - HAND SANITIZER/ COVID 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total: 125102 DEV SVCS WIDE FORMAT COPIER Dev Svcs Wide Format Copier Contrc 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 28293 INV 28293 - EDMONDS PD ANNUAL RADIO ANTENNA TEST 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 Total 24863511 WWTP: NO PO, FIXED BATTERY M( NO PO, FIXED BATTERY MOUNT 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 oil, filter 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 24863512 WWTP: NO PO, 2020 ANNUAL FOR NO PO, 2020 ANNUAL FORKLIFT PP 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 7.2.a Page: 31 Page: 31 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243854 8/27/2020 072800 TOYOTA LIFT NORTHWEST Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 243855 8/27/2020 065488 TRENDSET CONCRETE PRODUCTS 217754 243856 8/27/2020 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 104116 243857 8/27/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 107906 PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total : E9DC.CONCRETE MATERIALS E9DC.Concrete Materials 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 112.000.68.542.61.48.00 Total ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOPSOIL ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOPSOIL 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOPSOIL 2020 ( ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOPSOIL 2020 ( 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 Total 9860663959 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Cell Service-PW Sewer 7.2.a Page: 32 Amoun m 7.2£ E 345.6E a a� 3 3,608.0( 375.2' 3,983.X E 204.0( o �a 15.9- o a a Q 120.0( 0 N 9.3( ti 349.2, 00 0 N E 103.9E c 326.9" t 20.3" a 20.3" 20.1, Page: 32 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243857 8/27/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 243858 8/27/2020 076234 WASHINGTON TREE & LAWN CARE 1364020 243859 8/27/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS PO # Description/Account 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 Total : PM: TREE SPRAYING 6TH & BELL PM: TREE SPRAYING 6TH & BELL 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 Total 11851055 F.A.C. - COVID/ SAINITIZER F.A.C. - COVID/ SAINITIZER 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11851056 FAC MAINT - COVID/ SANITIZER DI: FAC MAINT - COVID/ SANITIZER DI; 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11868604 FAC MAINT - COVID/ DISINFECTANT FAC MAINT - COVID/ DISINFECTAN' 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11868606 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11876723 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.2.a Page: 33 Amoun 40.31 E 20.1, a 552.1 , L 3 c �a 260.0( y Y 27.0z t 287.0d E 0 1,816.7E 0 188.9z a a Q 1,894.7E N ti 197.0E 00 0 N E 686.4( 'ea 71.3� c a� E t 673.3, M .r a 70.0< 14.4 Page: 33 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 243859 8/27/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.5( Total: 5,614.6E 243860 8/27/2020 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR 5570008 PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 103.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 10.8- Total : 114.7E 243861 8/27/2020 061286 WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS C97909-001 UNIT 63 - PARTS/ HOSE ASSEMBLY UNIT 63 - PARTS/ HOSE ASSEMBLY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 121.4z 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.6, Total : 134.0E 243862 8/27/2020 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-527039 PM: WORK WEAR - DEBRA DILL PM: WORK WEAR - DEBRA DILL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 155.2, 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.2- TR-527040 PM: WORK WEAR - ERIC BIRD PM: WORK WEAR - ERIC BIRD 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 67.4� 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.6" Tota I : 244.5: 243863 8/27/2020 075139 WSP USA SOLUTIONS INC 981725 E4FE.SERVICES THRU 7/31/20 E4FE.Services thru 7/31/20 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 1,139.6' Total : 1,139.6' Page: 34 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243864 8/27/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 35 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) (D 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 31.1, E 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES a TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 162.7' 3 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 302.1, 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.8 1 a� TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.9( 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE o 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 47.01 �a TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE o L 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 87.3E a 425-697-6502 MUSEUM ALARM LINES - 118 5TH A Q Museum Alarm Lines - 118 5th Ave N c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 107.9' N 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE c~.i CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 74.1 < N 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION E 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 2 U 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 74.6E }; 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 68.1 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 139.7, 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 111.5z Page: 35 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 08/27/2020 9:25:18AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 243864 8/27/2020 011900 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 102 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 102 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 36 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 1,263.3: Bank total : 1,479,349.8° E �a Total vouchers : 1,479,349.8° Q- a� L 3 c �a Y V t V E V O O L Q 21 O N ti N 00 O N E 2 V a 0) E t V a Page: 36 Packet Pg. 114 7.2.b vchlist 08/27/2020 9:59:15AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8272020 8/27/2020 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui 6654 SULLIVAN CC - 8/06/2020 c TAP PLASTICS - COVID 1 GALLON I E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 194.4E AED SUPERSTORE - AED LIFEPACI a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 385.3( .� TNEMEC - LIBRARY/ PAINT 3 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 590.2E c Total: 1,170.W N Bank total : 1,170.W 4) t U Total vouchers : 1,170.W E U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a 0 N N 00 O d L- E M U �a a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 115 7.2.c vchlist 08/27/2020 10 :21:06AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 8312020 8/31/2020 076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui Sept 2020 ACCT #00397358 4TH AVE PARKIN( c 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - Sept 2 E E 001.000.39.542.64.45.00 417.E Total : 417.61 a a� L Bank total : 417.61 3 Total vouchers : 417.6 M U a� t U E 2 U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a 0 N eM 00 O 0) L 3 r c m E U �a a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 116 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC vi WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC E STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB R Q- m STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA L 3 STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project (Phase 7) c516 EBGA Y STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC aa) t WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA U E STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD o UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB O Q g: WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement (Phase10) c498 E7JA Q STR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA Co N STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA N STR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB ao c N STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA am STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC E STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB Z 0 L STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB d STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC CD uJ STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC >' c STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB a STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA u_ STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA c STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA CD E t STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC U ns STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD r Q STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 117 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Fundinq Project Title Number Number STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA vi c a� E R a m L �3 c N Y V m t U E 4- 0 0 L a a ZA Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 118 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAC� 048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program Pedestrian Task Force 111� STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 i EL Annual Storm 6QLReplacerqg&lect SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Phase ility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) Civic Center Playfield (Design) GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR ElDA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Project STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System Bikelink Projec STR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizatio STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STM E6FD Stormwater Comp Plan Update SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 119 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements vi STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall a� STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization Q. m STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW 3 STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement y PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) y t PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) U E PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive v — STIR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th a STIR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps Q STIR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps o N STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study ti N STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project i m SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project E WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement Z 0 UTILITIES E8JB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update a PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor CD rn STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming >+ STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install r STIR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study L STIR HAD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades u_ STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program E WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay v STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing Q STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 120 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) vi STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab R Q- m WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring L 3 STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Y STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System aa) t WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating U E STIR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project v STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector 0 STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility > 0 WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications a a WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Q STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) N SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II N SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project 00 c N L WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW z PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) o L WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South CD SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements a WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement Li STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project m PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design) E t PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) U STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 r r Q STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 121 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall vi STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive E STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements R Q- m STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th L 3 STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Y STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming U E STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing o STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program > 0 STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program Q WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay Q STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) N STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades N STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations 00 c N L STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming z STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program o L STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) CD PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization a UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates Li SW R ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study m STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E t STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update U STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study r r Q UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 122 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E91FA STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 HAD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB ZA Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 123 7.2.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02O EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA vi c a� E R a m L �3 c N Y V m t U E 4- 0 0 L a a ZA Revised 8/26/2020 Packet Pg. 124 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Eric Messenger ($4,322.16) Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead} Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Eric Messenger by minute entry. Narrative Eric Messenger 7605 206th St SW Edmonds WA 98026 ($4,322.16) Attachments: Messenger, Eric - Claim for Damages - Council Packet Pg. 125 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM 7.3.a f Date Claim Fonn Received by ty Please take note that12ie_ �� 5EW67 EK, who currently resides at mailing address 5 C home phone # work phone # 5d&ho resided at - at the time of the occurrence and whose claiming damages against i 4tl 6 OID/J DS in the sum of $ 4 3 ZZ 6 — arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: NO U , 2-1/ Zo 1 ! TIME: -7 Ar" LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought abort the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. A r ELzI ox- i m A 'ram/ �i = I a rl II /Z 2017_.� V Ir l A � R r_ X4V x� C.,rY1a � dQ. � s ot,� � r�C�.i� r f_c_Jar1C S -T►eUc k u 1 � r� -ti., ..�I_ a �... yk ► cQc c-- o +- w ; (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence includinq names, addresses, and phone numbers. _vo _ — — - - -- - 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? _Yes _ X No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: _ License Plate # Type Auto: (year) DRIVER: Address: Phone* Passengers: Name: Address: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY Driver License # (make) (model) OWNER: Address: Phone#: Name: Address: N m a� c� 0 L w E 2 U Form Revised 05°0614 Page I oft Packet Pg. 126 * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * I, i�� i G M t5 5 EA)6v 6e- . being first duly swom, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any information 1 provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may b ubject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56. x Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of �1no rift tsk,- I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that� is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged t�be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date �• �. t I t ��4��u1111 Title My appointment expires: q ' act• �08�3 210312 v' rn ..00 � �4k J1.��.7•�syy�G,~O � I,,��� 4 �W Q F A SN��.�► �� Please present the completed claim foram to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 a Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. d a� E c� G `o E V Fonn Revised 05106 14 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 127 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Compensation for Legislative/Executive Assistant to Council Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History On August 25th Council considered three options on how to address additional compensation going forward for the Legislative/Executive Assistant to Council. Council voiced concerns regarding assuring that action taken was not a gift of public funds. Due to this, Council requested that this issue be reviewed and confirmed. Once it could be confirmed that the additional compensation was not a gift of public funds, Council moved that the option to provide additional vacation to the employee be placed on consent for the following meeting. In order to provide clarity that additional vacation is based on work to be done and not work that has been done, the amendment has been adjusted to provide vacation as additional accrual each month rather than a single front loading of vacation. The City attorney has reviewed the amendment and feels the amendment does not create a gifting of public funds. Staff Recommendation Approve the amendment providing an additional 8.14 hours of vacation per month for the months of September, October, November, and December. Narrative See attached amendment Attachments: Amendment No. 1 to 2020-2021 M. Judge Employment Agreement 8.26.2020 (002) Packet Pg. 128 7.4.a AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL L O a O WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Maureen Judge (hereinafter referred to as the "Employee") entered into an underlying employment agreement, dated August 12, 2020, for the Employee to serve as �- the Legislative/ Executive Assistant to the City Council for the remainder of 2020 through January v 31, 2021, (hereinafter referred to as the "Underlying Agreement"); and WHEREAS, because the City Council required additional time to undertake the annual review of the Employee's performance, and to submit new contract terms to the Personnel Committee for review, the Underlying Agreement's wage increase, which was intended to take effect on February 1, 2020, took effect in August 2020, which resulted in a loss of income to the Employee in the amount of One Thousand One Hundred Four Dollars ($1,104.00); and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that it was the City's delay in finalizing the new employment agreement that resulted in the Employee's loss of income, and wishes to provide additional compensation to the Employee for her work going forward; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed on the appropriate method to provide additional compensation to the Employee for the remainder of the Underlying Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The Underlying Agreement, which is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is amended in, but only in, the following respect: A. Section 4.2 ("Vacation") is hereby revised to read as follows: 4.2 Vacation: Annual vacation is earned at the rate of 10 hours per month N (to be otherwise pro -rated if the employee works under 40 hours per week). N Due to the delay in implementing this Agreement, the City hereby grants to N the Employee an additional vacation accrual of 8.14 hours per month to be ° applied only for the months of September, October, November, and 6 December 2020, which grant shall have no effect on the annual vacation provided in subsequent agreements. Earned vacation can be carried over into the next calendar year, provided the amount carried over does not E exceed 176 hours total at the end of the duration of the contract. Unused, accrued vacation shall be paid upon termination of employment. Q 2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. Packet Pg. 129 7.4.a DATED this day of September 2020. CITY OF EDMONDS EMPLOYEE Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Maureen Judge L .° c 0 ca N c as a E O U M N O N O N O N O r Packet Pg. 130 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The City of Edmonds initiated a Comprehensive Plan map amendment in 2019 on four parcels around the Haines Wharf marina in 2019. The Planning Board reviewed the potential map amendment at two meetings including a public hearing on April 10, 2019 and forwarded a recommendation of approval following the public hearing. (See attached staff report and two sets of minutes.) Shortly after the public hearing, the City was approached by a party that was considering purchasing the Haines Wharf Marina. The Comprehensive Plan map amendment was paused while the party conducted their due diligence. There has been no activity on the Haines Wharf property so the City is continuing with presenting the Comprehensive Plan map amendment to the Council for consideration. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Council tentatively approve the Comprehensive Plan map change from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. Note: Since the Comprehensive Plan can generally be updated only once per year and two other proposed amendments still need to be considered this year, the Haines Wharf map change, along with any other amendments, will be brought back for Council's final approval at the end of the year as a single ordinance for all 2020 amendments. Narrative The City of Edmonds is initiating a Comprehensive Plan map amendment for the Haines Wharf site and adjacent properties. The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) in 2017. Prior to the comprehensive SMP update, Haines Wharf had an Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation. The shoreline designation for the Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update process. Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code: The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment (Aquatic 1) is to protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark (ECDC 24.30.030.A). The current Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the property is Mixed Use Commercial and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). Packet Pg. 131 8.1 The SMP only allows commercial development and uses in the Aquatic I environment when it is associated with a permitted use on the abutting upland shoreline areas. The abutting upland areas are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential 1, both of which prohibit commercial uses. As such, no commercial use or development could occur on the subject properties consistent with the SMP. Given the SMP update, the City has initiated the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. The attached staff report provides a detailed evaluation of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and findings consistent with ECDC 20.00.050. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Staff Report - Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Exhibit 2: January 23, 2019 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 3: April 10, 2019 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 132 8.1.a f'?c. 1 O`)" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION To: E onds' Plannine Board From: - - ernen Lien Environmental Programs Manager Date: April 5, 2019 File: AMD20180011 Hearing Date, Time, and Place: I. INTRODUCTION April 10, 2019 at 7:00 PM, Edmonds City Council Chambers Public Safety Complex 250 - 5th Avenue North The City of Edmonds has initiated a Comprehensive Plan map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation of the Haines Wharf parcels from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) in 2017. Prior to the comprehensive SMP update, Haines Wharf had an Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation (Attachment 1). The shoreline designation for the Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update (Attachment 2). Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code: The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment (aquatic I) is to protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark (ECDC 24.30.030.A). The current Comprehensive Plan map designation for the property is Mixed Use Commercial r (Attachment 3) and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (Attachment 5). The structures on the Haines Wharf property have been deteriorating for years while the w property owner has been unsuccessful in obtaining and/or finalizing development permits for the property. Given the recent SMP update, the City is initiating the Comprehensive Plan E map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation to a more appropriate U r r Q Packet Pg. 133 8.1.a designation consistent with the Shoreline Master Program. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND ANALYSIS A. Site Context The subject of this Comprehensive Plan map amendment are the four parcels that are adjacent to and contain Haines Wharf (also known as Meadowdale Marina). See Attachment 3. The parcel numbers from north to south are 00513900100100, 00513900100200, 00513900100700, and 00513900101200. Tax parcel number 00513900100700 is the parcel that contains the Haines Wharf structure. The four parcels are owned by Snohomish County (00513900100100), Jeri Ann Merritt (00513900100200), Meadowdale Marina LLC (00513900100700) and the City of Edmonds (00513900101200). The subject site is located west of the railroad right-of-way in the tide lands of Puget Sound. Access to the site is limited due to the presence of the railroad and a locked gate preventing access to the Marina. Landward of the property is Haines Wharf Park and single-family residential properties with RS-12 (Single-family residential; 12,000 square feet minimum lot size) and RS-20 (Single-family residential; 20,000 square feet minimum lot size) zoning. Historically, there had been two structures on the property. A wooden barn like structure was barged in circa 1939. This was the original Haines Wharf that operated as a full - service sport fishing facility for 30 years. Around 1970 the property was sold and a second metal structure was constructed on the site in 1975. The site was renamed Meadowdale Marina and shifted from a full -service sport fishing business to boat storage. According to City3 records there has not been a business license for the site since 2001, although an application for a business license was applied for in 2008 but never issued. The current owner of the Haines Wharf structure (Meadowdale Marina LLC) applied for and received a shoreline permit substantial development permit in 2005 to reconstruct the then existing timber portion of the peer. While the shoreline permit was issued, it was recognized that the structures on the site were nonconforming structures and conditions added noted that if any of the structures were moved any distance (emphasis in the original condition) they would have to be demolished. Other conditions noted the project would have to comply with conditions imposed by Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, and Natural Resources, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The property owner was not successful in receiving all of the approvals to reconstruct the in pier and over time, the Haines Wharf structure and wooden pier deteriorated and no longer exists. The metal 1975 structure still exists on the site and is connect via a narrow walkway to the shoreline. x w The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment t Page 2 of 7 r r Q Packet Pg. 134 8.1.a (SMP) in 2017 which changed the shoreline environmental designation of the site. Prior to the 2017 update, the Haines Wharf properties had an Urban Mixed use II shoreline designation (Attachment 1). The shoreline designation for Haines Wharf site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive SMP update (Attachment 2). Pursuant to the SMP as codified in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC): The purposed of the aquatic low -intensity environment (aquatic 1) is to protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark. (ECDC 24.30.030.A) The SMP's Restoration Plan also identifies the Haines Wharf structures (Meadowdale Marina in the Restoration Plan) as a restoration opportunity. The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Mixed Use Commercial (Attachment 3) and the property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). B. Notice Pursuant to Chapter 20.03 ECDC, a notice of the public hearing was posted at the subject site, mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site and published in the Everett Herald. Additional, the notice of public hearing was posted at the library, City Hall, and the Public Safety Complex. C. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. D. Edmonds Community Development Code Compliance In accordance with ECDC 20.00.050, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan may be adopted only if the findings in ECDC 20.00.050 can be made. Below are the required findings and staff analysis: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public interest; Staff Findings: The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject properties is Commercial Mixed Use. The Comprehensive Plan does not have any goals or policies specific to the Commercial Mixed Use designation like some of the other commercial designation; however, the Comprehensive Plan does contain some general goals and policies that apply to all commercial areas. Commercial Development Goal A provides: Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being r consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically w feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment E t Page 3 of 7 r r Q Packet Pg. 135 8.1.a residents and tourists in a safe, convenient and attractive manner, in accordance with the following policies: A.2 Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. The property is located in a residential neighborhood with no other commercial activity in the area. To access the site, one would have to travel through local streets (as classified by the City's Transportation Plan) and cross the railroad tracks where there is no signaled crossing. So commercial development of the site is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, nor is there safe access to the site. As previously noted, the shoreline environmental designation for the site was changed to Aquatic I during the comprehensive update of the City's Shoreline Master Program. Regarding commercial uses within the Aquatic I shoreline environment, the ECDC 24.6n-n3n-D-9 nrnviriPc- ---------- 1---------- Aquatic 1. Commercial and light industrial use and development are prohibited, except that water -dependent uses and appurtenant structures may be permitted subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline area designation. Pursuant to ECDC 24.60.030.D.9, commercial development and uses are only permitted within an abutting upland shoreline designation. The two abutting shoreline designations are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential I. Pursuant to ECDC 24.60.030.D.1 and D.2, commercial uses and development are prohibited in the Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential I shoreline environments. Since no upland commercial use either exists or is allowed, no commercial development could be permitted on the subject properties. So consistent with the Commercial Development Goal A.2, the subject properties should be reclassified for other uses. The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Open Space. The 3: Comprehensive Plan provides the following with regards to Open Space. General. Open space is important in defining the character of the Edmonds area = and should be preserved and enhanced for enjoyment by current and future generations. Open space serves many functions ranging from providing recreation to protecting aesthetics and biodiversity. Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining in the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies. A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: w A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Page 4 of 7 r r Q Packet Pg. 136 8.1.a linked wildlife corridors or habitats of rare or endangered species. Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: 8.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. Numerous fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland habitats for either part or all of their life stages. Shellfish resources include clams, mussels, crab, and shrimp. Eight species of salmonids use nearshore areas of Puget Sound at some point in their life cycle. These include Chinook (a critical prey species for the endangered resident Puget Sound Orca), chum, coho, sockeye, pink salmon and sea -run cutthroat trout, steelhead, and bull trout. Several federally listed threatened or endangered species also inhabit marine waters within the City. These include federally listed threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout. Federally listed marine mammals such as the Steller sea lion and Puget Sound Orcas are also present in the Edmonds shorelines. Open Space Goal B specifically recognizes that the Puget Sound and our saltwater shorelines should receive special consideration for preservation. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the rest of the shoreline area from the subject properties south to Brackett's Landing South are also designated as Open Space. The proposed Open Space Comprehensive Plan designation for the properties is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City, Staff Findings: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City. The Open Space designation for the site implements the Shoreline Master Program and could help preserve and enhance habitat for federally threatened species. Access to the site with the unsignaled crossing is a safety concern. The low intensity Open Space designation is more appropriate for the site. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City, and, Staff Findings: There is one other area with the Mixed Use Commercial r Comprehensive Plan designation. This area is centered on the 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W intersection (Attachment 4). These urban upland areas are more w appropriate for commercial uses than the Puget Sound tidelands. Additionally, there aD AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment E Page 5 of 7 r Q Packet Pg. 137 8.1.a are many other areas of the City that allow for commercial development, and the removal of this nonconforming site from the commercial designation will not impact the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. 4. In the case of an amendment to the comprehensive policy plan map, the subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use developments(s), including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. Staff Findings: The subject property is not physically suitable for the current Mixed Use Commercial designation. The landward neighborhood is a single-family residential area. The railroad tracks impose a physical obstacle to access to the site, and the Shoreline Master Program prohibits commercial development at the site and on the abutting upland properties. The proposed Open Space designation is more appropriate for intended land use of the area and more compatible with the adjoining land uses. III. CONCLUSIONS A. The existing structure on the site is nonconforming and could not be expanded in any way. B. The Shoreline Master Program prohibits commercial use or development on the subject properties as well as the abutting upland properties. C. The exiting railroad is a safety issue for access to the site. D. The Puget Sound shorelines provide critical habitat for federal listed species. An Open Space Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is consistent with the goals and polices of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Master Program. The proposed amendment is consistent with the required findings of ECDC 20.00.050.1 IV. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of facts, analysis, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff proposes that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to APPROVE the Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space. V. ATTACHMENTS 1. Old Shoreline Master Program Environmental Designations r 2. Current Shoreline Master Program Environmental Designations -2 3. Vicinity Comprehensive Plan Map x w 4. City Wide Comprehensive Plan Map m AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment t Page 6 of 7 r r Q Packet Pg. 138 8.1.a 5. Vicinity Zoning Map 6. 2017 Aerial Photo VI. PROPERTY OWNERS City of Edmonds 121— 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Jeri Ann Merritt PO Box 5142 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Snohomish County Property Management Division 3000 Rockefeller Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Vladan Milosavljevic Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98037 AMD20180011— Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Page 7 of 7 r Q Packet Pg. 139 rr,F I 8.1.a Legend LHaines Wharf Parcels ME 1561 1560¢41�.. .. 5 bra ,153 a 15620, �1�y 711 1�18 +r � •': 71?9 15700 Yf a•5715' �5702 15701 i i 1570 r t K W j.i Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 Shoreline Designation Scale a 1 inch = 400 feet Attachment 2 Packet Pg. 141 8.1.a Legend Haines Wharf Parcels 7026 ' 4 15t 7120 7110. 1562o 157 7029 5t�u 15631 15718 7119 7117 r 115700 15722 15715 15702 roi N 15701 706 15724 15719 15712 7.14 722 15725 15728 7329. 15734 1 S 15730 1 8 6 7400 1 8 8 7324 1185, 5910 59251 15917 VL7;0:9��5912 Ofl 0 0 006 co m 3 6pp1 1 08 16007 601 a al 1603 �rc 1610 6106 ^ . j o J 1611 6 1613 ^rr 6121 JD ST SW 7 000 15805 15910 15917 15920 �S � m 16122 16209 �^ 16209 16206 6234 0 16236 o ^ N n 3 16221 16238 16228 �y 6310 /4 16311 0 16222 16232..•' ql -GQJ 16320 Single -Family Resource)6 16318 a 1631516320 2� 16330 .- N ' F- 16340 16319 7316 7212. N M 7109 r, 16323 16322 j 4 164TH ST SW 46 16411 7404 7317' � mo 7114 o 0 �6 2 d 9 7320 E64"TH PL SW V M 16419 16431 74067314 M730 .; � 16423 7028 6510' j j / 16515 ' 1 16520 16520 16g1p 16501 � 1-4 m ' c 16525 7130 0 N o M W 7124 n 0 i 6, Q 16621 16612 16618 16611 ID Q6.�^ W Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 u Comprehensive Plan Designation Scale a 1 inch = 400 feet Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 142 elm =goIsolo] sle Legend Haines Wharf Parcels W r Haines Wharf Comprehensive Plan Amendment AMD20180011 2017 Aerial Photo ` Scale a 1 inch = 400 feet Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 145 8.1.b Board Member Monroe asked for a status report on the public process related to housing. He asked if the issue would come back to the Planning Board at some point in the future. Mr. Lien answered that a public open house was held on January 10' and was well attended. Board Member Crank said she did not attend the public meeting, but the ad hoc housing group is having its final meeting on January 31". She anticipates the meeting will include information and feedback that was gathered from the last two open houses, and it will likely be the official ending of the group. Board Member Monroe asked if a work product would result from the housing group meetings, and Board Member Crank answered no. She explained that the group was intended to be a type of stop gap to allow a pause and an opportunity to work the Housing Strategy back to what it was supposed to be. At the group's last meeting, it was discussed that a Housing Commission could potentially be formed. If a Housing Commission is appointed, she suggested it might be helpful for them to meet jointly with the Planning Board. HAINES WHARF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT INTRODUCTION (FILE NO. AMD20180011) Mr. Lien advised that this is a City -initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment that involves four parcels in the Haines Wharf area. The City owns a small parcel, and the other three are privately owned. Notice letters were sent to the three property owners, but no response has been received to date. Mr. Lien explained that the current Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the properties is Mixed Use Commercial and the properties are zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The only other area in the City that is zoned Commercial Waterfront is near the downtown and near the Port of Edmonds. The remainder of the tidelands are zoned Open Space (OS). With the exception of a few properties that are zoned Mixed Use Commercial, properties further shoreland are zoned Single Family Resource (RSW). RS-20 requires a lot size of at least 20,000 square feet and RS-12 requires a lot size of at least 12,000 square feet. He also advised that the existing structure on the subject parcels has been deteriorating over the years. Mr. Lien said the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is primarily an outgrowth of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) update. He provided an image to depict the old shoreline designation for the properties and explained that under the old SMP, the areas were intensely developed with a mixed use of commercial, port facilities, multi -modal transit facilities, railroad facilities and limited light industrial uses. With the recently updated SMP (2017), the shoreline designation was changed to Aquatic I. The purpose of the aquatic low -intensity environment is to protect, restore and manage the unique characteristic and resources of the areas waterward of the Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM). The City initiated the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation to a more appropriate designation consistent with the SMP. At the request of Board Member Lovell, Mr. Lien shared information about the properties that were developed under a Planned Residential Development and a Contract Rezone. Board Member Monroe requested clarification about what property the existing building is located on, and Mr. Lien answered that part of it is on private property and part is on state tidelands. The current tideland lease with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is month -to -month. He explained that before the wooden structure deteriorated, the property owner applied for a shoreline permit to refurbish the site. The structure was non -conforming under both the current and previous SMP. The property owner obtained a shoreline permit from the City but was unable to get a permit from the other government agencies. At this time, nothing is being pursued. Board Member Monroe asked if the other permits would have been required if the structure was located entirely on the private property. Mr. Lien responded that a variety of state agency permits would be required because the structure is located within navigable waters. To further clarify the proposal, Mr. Lien explained that zoning overlay, shoreline designation and Comprehensive Plan "' designation are different designations that apply to the site. The zoning designation has to be consistent with the N Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed -Use Commercial, and both the zoning designation and Comprehensive Plan designation must be consistent with the SMP. Currently, the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations are not consistent, 3 and staff is proposing that the Comprehensive Plan Map designation be changed from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space r_ (OS), which is consistent with rest of the tidelands next to the residential areas in North Edmonds (from the subject parcels n all the way to Brackett's Landing South). Mr. Lien reminded the Commission that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can only be adopted if the following z findings are made: w c • Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the public interest? t 0 M Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 146 8.1.b • Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City? • Does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City? • Is the subject parcel physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development, including, but not limited to, access provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining and uses and absence of physical constraints. Mr. Lien explained that the Comprehensive Plan requires the City to develop and implement the SMP consistent with the Shoreline Management Act (SMA), and that is the purpose of the proposed amendment. When the amendment comes back to the Board for a public hearing, he will present a staff report to further explain how the proposed change is consistent with the four criteria. He summarized his presentation by stating that the next step would be a public hearing by the Planning Board in March, followed by a recommendation to the City Council. Board Member Lovell observed that one sliver of the property is owned by the City and the other three are privately owned, and the entire Haines Wharf complex is crumbling into the Sound and causing pollution. He asked if the Corps of Engineers has anything to say about the future of this property and the existing structure. Mr. Lien responded that number of agencies have been watching the structure decay over the years with nobody really stepping up and taking the lead. The Department of Ecology (DOE) has stepped in from time to time, as has the DNR because of the lease. After a significant storm a few years ago, the City made the property owners remove the wood portion and stabilize the rest of the structure. Pollution no longer occurs during high tide and/or significant storms. However, it is still a nonconforming structure that is inconsistent with the SMP, and not a lot can be done with the site beyond maintaining it in its current condition. Board Member Lovell asked if the properties would be considered undevelopable if the Comprehensive Plan Map designation is changed to OS. Mr. Lien shared a zoning map and explained that, currently, the Haines Wharf properties are designated as Commercial Waterfront, and the properties from Haines Wharf down to the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant are zoned OS. The properties between the treatment plant and the ferry terminal are zoned RSW-12. The RSW-12 zone was primarily developed for Lake Ballinger, so it has setbacks that are described from the lake edge. The Zoning Code has a chapter for the Marine Resource (MR) zone. Based on his research, the MR zone is supposed to apply to the OS and RSW zones in the tidelands, but it has not been applied to any properties on the zoning map. When it was initially adopted, it was applied to the tidelands outside of the City limits. However, when the City created the new electronic maps, the zone disappeared from the zoning map. Mr. Lien shared details about the MR zone, noting that its purpose is to regulate uses at the tidelands and other lands covered by saltwater, to preserve and enhance the natural marine environment along the shoreline in Edmonds, and to provide local control over the natural marine environment to the extent that state and federal regulations allow. The MR zone allows for permitted uses such as commercial fishing, sports fishing, movement of vessels, swimming, and snorkeling. It also allows uses that require a Conditional Use Permit such as submerged power and communication cables, filling, dredging, submerged construction, breakwaters, bulkheads, scientific installation, marine extraction, mineral extraction from water, marine agriculture and propagation, and educational and recreational facilities. He said that he plans to review this zone further at some point in the future to determine how it could potentially be amended and applied to properties along the shoreline in Edmonds. Mr. Lien again emphasized that the property has three separate designations: Shoreline Environment, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. The current proposal would only amend the Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the subject parcels from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space, which is consistent with the rest of the waterfront. The proposed amendment would make the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the SMP. Changing the zoning will be a separate action that would follow the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Board Member Lovell summarized that a future zoning amendment would involve a look at all of the rest of the zones along the waterfront relative to tidelands and previous zoning designations, but zoning is not part of the current proposal. Board N Member Monroe asked if the Board would consider potential impacts to the property owners as part of any proposed zoning change. Mr. Lien answered affirmatively. Again, he said he has notified the property owners of the proposed Comprehensive Plan change, but he has not heard back from any of them. w c m E t 0 Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 147 8.1.b Board Member Rubenkonig asked for more information about how the federal and state agencies are also involved, given that the properties are classified as tidelands. Mr. Lien explained that a variety of permitting agencies have responsibilities associated with the properties. For example, if the property owners were to apply for a permit, the Washington State a) Department of Fish and Wildlife would have permit authority and not the City of Edmonds. The DNR would also have permit authority, as would the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which would coordinate with the Natural Marine Fisheries Services. Each of these agencies have different permitting requirements. Only the City of a Edmonds implements the SMP and the zoning, but the DNR has a tideland lease. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the DNR would find the proposed change suitable to its mission, and Mr. Lien answered affirmatively. He said he has had E numerous conversations with representatives from the DNR over the years as the site has deteriorated. E c d Board Member Rubenkonig asked when the last time the property was commercially viable. Mr. Lien answered that he does E not believe there was a commercial operation going on in 2008 when the property owners last applied for a Shoreline Permit. Q Board Member Rubenkonig asked what is stopping the site from being commercially viable. Mr. Lien explained that the ig property owners have not secured access from Burlington Northern Santa Fe, so there is no safe crossing across the tracks to a the subject parcels. The location is another factor. Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that there were viable businesses on > the properties at one point in time. d t Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the owners would be compensated if the properties are rezoned. Mr. Lien said the structure is non -conforming now, and it would remain non -conforming if the proposed amendment is approved. Therefore, the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and subsequent rezone would not really change what is allowed to be there. V He further explained that under the current SMP, a covered, over -water structure would not be allowed and the use would be U considered non -conforming, as well. If a non -conforming use ceases to exist for a period of time, only conforming uses and structures would be allowed going forward. Board Member Rubenkonig summarized that the structure's commercial ?� viability has been significantly reduced over the past decade. Mr. Lien emphasized that the structure was considered non- W conforming under the previous SMP, which was adopted in 2000, so it has been non -conforming for the past 19 years. The c_ intent is not to continue the non-conformance forever, but ultimately for the use to go away. M 2 Board Member Rubenkonig summarized her understanding that the proposed amendment would not take away from the a property owners' ability to have a business, but they will have to jump through hoops to get it to be viable. This is no different than for any other business in Edmonds. Mr. Lien clarified that the structure can be maintained. However, he is not w aware of any commercial activity at the site at this time. He read from the non -conforming section of the code that if a non- conforming use is discontinued for 6 consecutive months of for 12 months during any 2-year period, any subsequent use must be conforming. Board Member Monroe asked if structures could be built on the other properties under the Commercial Waterfront designation. Mr. Lien answered that the property owners would not be allowed to construct a building over the water now. m The current SMP no longer allows covered structures over water. Board Member Monroe observed that the value of the a properties was significantly reduced when the previous SMP was adopted in 2000. Mr. Lien said all he knows is that the structure was non -conforming when the City issued approval of a Shoreline Permit in 2008 under the old SMP that was adopted in 2000. At least since 2000, the structure type was not allowed and the existing structure was non -conforming. a rn Board Member Monroe asked about the advantage of changing the Comprehensive Plan designation if the existing Mixed c Commercial Use designation does not allow development, either. Mr. Lien said the purpose is to make the SMP and N Comprehensive Plan consistent with each other. Board Member Monroe clarified that, in functionality, the proposed change N would not cause any additional impacts that were not present in 2000. Mr. Lien concurred. M 3 Mr. Lien advised that the proposed amendments will come back to the Board for a public hearing in March. r_ n REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA N Chair Cheung reviewed that the February 13t1i agenda will include a continued discussion on the Wireless Facilities z Ordinance for small cell standards. i j Planning Board Minutes January 23, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 148 8.1.c DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Cheung referred the Board to the Development Services Director's Report that was provided in the packet. Board Member Rosen pointed out that the Planning Board meeting is on April 10' and not April 5'. PUBLIC HEARING: HAINES WHARF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING (FILE NO. AMD20180011) Mr. Lien said the subject property is located west of the railroad right-of-way in the tidelands of Puget Sound. The parcels are currently owned by Snohomish County, the City of Edmonds, Jeri Ann Merritt and Meadowdale Marina LLC. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the four parcels as Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC), and the properties are zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The proposed amendment would change the land use designation to Open Space (OS) consistent with the property to the south. Landward of the subject parcels, the land use designation is Single -Family Resource (SFR) and the zoning is Single -Family Residential (RS-12 and RS-20). The property to the south is zoned OS. The current amendment before the Board would not change the zoning at this time. Mr. Lien explained that the properties were previously designated as Urban Mixed Use (UMU), but the 2017 Comprehensive Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update changed the land use designation to Aquatic I. Aquatic I areas are mostly characterized by aquatic ecosystems that have been modified by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad bed fill that covers the intertidal and transitional upland zones along the beach. The beach has been altered by seawalls or larger -rock riprap. These shoreline areas generally exhibit low -intensity development and few overwater structures. In freshwater areas, there may be a significant number of docks and piers serving residential areas. Mr. Lien noted that, historically, there were two structures on the property. A wooden barn -like structure was brought to the site via barge in 1939 and became the original Haines Wharf that was operated as a full -service sport fishing facility for 30 years. Around 1970, the property was sold and a second metal structure was constructed on the site in 1975. The site was also renamed Meadowdale Marina and shifted to primarily being used as boat storage. According to the City's records, there has been no active business license for the site since 2001. The current owner of the Meadowdale Marina site applied for a business license in 2008, but it was never issued. The owner also applied and received a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit in 2005 to reconstruct the existing timber portion of the pier. The permit was issued but it recognized that the structures and uses on the site were nonconforming. Conditions were added to note that, per the City's nonconformance code, moving the structures any distance would require them to be demolished and the new structures would have to comply with the current code. Other conditions noted the project would have to comply with conditions imposed by the Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE), Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WSDFW), the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). From looking at the record, it appears the applicant was not successful in receiving all of the permits needed to go forward with the restoration, and the original wooden structure deteriorated over time and no longer exists. The metal 1975 structure still exists on the site and is connected via a narrow walkway to the shoreline. He provided aerial photographs taken in 2005 and 2017 to illustrate how the conditions on the site have changed, pointing out that the entire wooden structure is gone, the site has been secured, and it is no longer putting debris into the Sound. He noted that the site was also identified in the SMP Restoration Plan as a potential restoration site. Mr. Lien reviewed the criteria that must be considered when considering Comprehensive Plan amendments (ECDC 20.00.050) and shared how the proposal is consistent with each one: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public interest. M Currently, the site is designated as MUC. While there are no provisions in the Comprehensive Plan specific to that designation, some general goals and policies apply to all commercial areas. For example: s x w • Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 149 8.1.c neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds. Staff does not believe the current land use designation is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and there is no safe access to the site. The subject parcels are located in a residential neighborhood with no other commercial activity in the area. There are no arterial or collector streets to the site, which can only be accessed via local streets. Access to the site is further limited due to the presence of the unsignalized railroad crossing and a locked gate preventing access to the marina. Commercial Development Goal A.2. Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. The SMP identifies the subject parcels as Aquatic -I, which prohibits commercial and light industrial uses and development, except water -dependent uses and appurtenant structures may be permitted subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline area designation. The two abutting shoreline environments are Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential, and neither allow commercial uses and development. Therefore, commercial uses would not be permitted on the subject parcels, either. Staff believes the site should be reclassified consistent with this goal. • Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies: o A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces. o A.2.b. Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked wildlife corridors or habitats or rare or endangered species. • Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: o B.1. Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. A number of fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland habitat for either part or all of their life stages. There are 8 species of salmonids that frequent the Edmonds Shoreline, and there are also endangered and threatened species (Puget Sound Chinook, bull trout, Steller sea lion, and Puget Sound Orcas. Open Space Goal B specifically recognizes that the Puget Sound and the City's saltwater shorelines should receive special consideration for preservation. Staff believes the proposed OS designation would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and welfare of the City. The main purpose of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is to implement the updated SMP that went through c an extensive public process before final adoption in 2017. The proposed new land use designation will help preserve and r enhance habitat for federally -listed species. At this time, access to the site via an unsignalized railroad crossing is a Q safety concern, and staff believes the low -intensity OS designation is more appropriate for the site. a M 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. The only other area in the City that has the MUC designation is in the Medical Highway Activity Center near Highway W 99. The urban upland areas are more appropriate for commercial uses than Puget Sound tidelands, and there are a lot of other areas in the City with commercial designations. Staff believes that removing a nonconforming site would not m impact the appropriate balance of land uses when it comes to commercial development in the City. r c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 150 8.1.c 4. In case of an amendment to the Comprehensive Policy Plan Map, the subject parcels area physically suitable for the requested land use designations(s) and the anticipated land use development(s), including, but not limited to, access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. The site is not physically suitable for the current MUC designation. The landward neighborhood is single-family residential, and the site can only be accessed via local roads. The railroad tracks impose a physical obstacle to the site, and the SMP prohibits commercial uses and development on the subject parcels. Staff feels the proposed OS land use designation is more appropriate and compatible with the adjoining land uses. Mr. Lien concluded his presentation by recommending the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) to Open Space (OS). Board Member Lovell asked if the remaining metal building on the site is nonconforming, and Mr. Lien answered yes. He explained that the SMP no longer allows overwater structures. Board Member Monroe asked what changing the designation would do since the existing structure and use are already nonconforming. Mr. Lien explained that all of the City's plans, policies and zoning should be consistent with each other, and this is the first step in the process to make the City's Comprehensive Plan consistent with the currently adopted SMP. Next year, the City will review zoning along the waterfront, including zoning for the subject parcels. The City's code has a Marina Resource (MR) zone, but the zoning map does not have any MR zones associated with it. He noted that, currently, most of the City's tidelands are zoned RSW-12, which is the zoning that applies to Lake Ballinger but doesn't make any sense for the tidelands. However, he emphasized that the current proposal is a Comprehensive Plan amendment and not a zoning amendment. Board Member Monroe summarized that the amendment is more of a process change, and development potential on the subject parcels would not change. Board Member Monroe asked what would happen after both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Map have been updated to be consistent with the SMP. Mr. Lien said the wooden structure has been removed and no longer dumps debris into Puget Sound. The City would not force the property owner to do anything with the property, and the existing structure will remain a nonconforming structure, as it has for years. The proposed amendment would not change what the property owner is allowed to do on the site. Board Member Rosen asked if the proposed amendment would have any impact on the current property owners, and Mr. Lien answered that the Comprehensive Plan amendment would not change what the property owners are allowed to do on the site. He explained that any development would have to comply with both the zoning and the SMP. While the zone would remain CW until the shoreline is rezoned, the existing use is still nonconforming based on the SMP, and the SMP rules what can be done on the site. Guy Mansfield, Edmonds, disclosed that he lives close by the subject parcels and has some personal preferences and opinions. However, he will restrict his comments to objective matters. He reviewed the April 5`E' document from the � Planning Commission Advisory Report and found it does a good job of laying out the facts. Specifically, the current a structure is nonconforming. It has been nonconforming in the past and will be nonconforming in the future. It seems like it a) would be unfeasible, both in terms of permitting and expenses, to do anything with the property. It is very clear that the SMP N specifically prohibits commercial use of the properties because they abut both residential and the railroad property. He also c believes that changing the Comprehensive Plan designation to OS is the right thing to do to be consistent with the SMP. He observed that there is a real issue with commercial traffic to the structures. Specifically, all traffic going to the structure Q would have to go down an extremely quiet street that is immediately adjacent to the park. Everyday, he sees children Q walking on that street as they wander out of the park. He said it seems evident that opening up access to the subject parcels would be an additional disruption to rail traffic. He concluded that the proposed change seems to clearly provide a greater value to the community, more safety for children visiting the park, and better protection for Puget Sound and the s environment. w Vice Chair Robles asked what incentive there is for the property owner to remove the structure rather than letting it continue to deteriorate and become an eyesore. If the neighbors were to petition for its removal, he asked if they would be more likely E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 151 8.1.c to prevail under the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning. Mr. Lien said the property is already identified in the SMP as a potential restoration site, but the City cannot force restoration. If someone wants to use the site as restoration = for another project along Puget Sound, they would have to purchase the property from the property owner. Over the years, the DNR and DOE have worked with the property owner to shore up the structures. Since the wood structure has basically = deteriorated away, it no longer dumps debris into the Sound during major storms. But there is still an opportunity for V restoration, as removing piers and underwater structures is better for the environment. Again, he said it is not something the M City can force on the property owner. a c Board Member Monroe asked if the proposed change would make it more likely that the remaining elements of the wood structure would be removed. Again, Mr. Lien answered that he does not know if the current or proposed land use designation 3 would make it more or less likely. The property has already been identified as a potential restoration site, regardless of the E land use designation. Q c Board Member Lovell asked if the BNSF trains blast their horns as they travel through the area. Mr. Lien said no, the a crossing is gated and locked now, and BNSF no longer recognizes it as a crossing. Access over the tracks to the shoreline would require a person to go over the fence. c Chair Cheung asked if there have been any issues with kids and homeless people hanging out on the existing structure. Mr. Lien answered that he is not aware of any calls related to vandalism. n E Vladan Milosavljevic, General Manager of Meadowdale Marina, advised that the original wooden structure was brought �j to the site from Sequim via barge in 1939 and was previously used as a cannery. In 1939, the marina rented out plywood `t= boats for people to use in Puget Sound to fish, etc. During World War Il, Mr. Haines offered the marina for war use. He also t offered the War Department his boats and manpower to transport the soldiers from Haines Wharf to Whidbey Island. Later on, the facility was used as a Coast Guard station, and then it was used for renting and storing boats. The property has been transferred from Laebugten Boat House, Haines Wharf and then Meadowdale Marina, but the same people owned the property until he purchased it. The metal building was built in 1975 to expand the business and also provide a fuel station for x boats. The facility was successful through the mid-80s and generated revenue for the City. When he purchased the property, +, he decided to remove the fuel tanks and obtained a permit from the Fire Marshal to do so. U Mr. Milosavljevic continued that in 2002-2003 he started plans to restore the wood structure back to its original use. In w 2004-2005 he obtained a hydraulics permit, as well as permits from the WSDFW, the Army Corps, and DOE. Later on, he also received a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Edmonds. In 2007-2008 he lined up people with funds to contribute for the project, and everything was ready to go. He applied for a building permit from the City to replace the 45,000 square foot wood pier with steel piling and a concrete deck. He aid the City $25 000 for the plans to be reviewed q p� p� g p Y p � and a permit to be issued. The building permit was ready for pick up when the economic recession hit and his investors got scared, and lost the house he built next door that he was planning to live in while he operated the marina. o°p a Mr. Milosavljevic said he once again applied for a building permit five years ago. He obtained a permit from the WSDFW and was ready to submit for permits from the Army Corps of Engineers, the DOE and other government agencies, but times were still tough financially. Now he has identified a potential developer, but he has been unable to secure a loan for the a project. The current SMP designation limits what can be done on the property, and this has created a heavy financial burden an for him. The property is no longer worth as much. The SMP was changed so the City can provide a greenbelt along the CIAwaterfront. He questioned how the City could restore the beautiful shoreline unless they get the train tracks off the coastline. c He encouraged the Board Members to deny the nonsensical Comprehensive Plan amendment. He said the railroad pollutes the coastline more than Meadowdale Marina or nearly everything else. Q Q Mr. Milosavljevic said that, according to the City Planner, he hasn't done much with the property. However, he has a file full of correspondence, permits, applications and approvals. He has been through the process before, when the Hearing Examiner determined that he could not rebuild the wooden structure if it was torn down, but that is not the case. It cost him money s each time he has to defend his proposal to the City of Edmonds. If the proposed amendment is adopted, he will once again w have to go before the Hearing Examiner to fight it out. He strongly urged the Board to recommend denial of the proposed amendment. His intention is to work with his investors to rebuild the wooden structure and clean up the metal structure to become beautiful and a benefit for everyone. E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 152 8.1.c Mr. Milosavljevic explained that the BNSF crossing near his property was established in 1910, and it will cost him between $25,000 and $30,000 to restore the crossing with arms, signals, etc. Safety is very important to him, and when the time comes, he will pay the fee and make the appropriate upgrades. Vice Chair Robles voiced concern that staff is telling the Board that the proposed amendment would have no impact on the property owner, but the property owner is indicating that his property would be significantly impacted. He felt that a lot of issues need to be ironed out before the Board can forward a recommendation to the City Council. Chair Cheung agreed that there needs to be more discussion about how the proposed change might impact the property owners. He asked if there are steps in place for Mr. Milosavljevic to implement his plan. Mr. Lien said it is hard to answer without seeing an actual application. However, he explained that, in addition to the structure being nonconforming, the use is nonconforming, as well. He read from ECDC 20.470.010.D: "If a nonconforming use is discontinued for six consecutive months or twelve months during any two-year period, any subsequent use shall be conforming." During his presentation, he noted that there has not been a business license on the site since 2001. While the property owner applied for a business license in 2008, it was never issued, in part, because of the nonconforming aspect of the site. In his opinion, the way the SMP is spelled out, developing the site would be a very heavy lift, if not impossible. Board Member Monroe asked if the City has sought feedback from a real estate appraiser to determine what the impact of the proposed amendment would be. Mr. Lien answered no. Board Member Monroe said it would be interesting to know the potential damage, but it would probably be difficult to figure out. Board Member Monroe summarized that, currently, the City's position is that nothing can happen on the property based on the current MUC designation. The proposed amendment would definitely make it so the property owner could not do anything else on the property and remove all of the ambiguity out of it. Other than a more streamlined SMP process, there is no real tangible benefit to the amendment. Mr. Lien responded that the amendment is intended to address a consistency issue. Board Member Monroe commented that consistency makes sense from the City's point of view, but the property owner wants to keep fighting for his right to develop the site and there is a process for that to occur. He questioned why the City wants to change the land use designation when the existing designation works just as well. Mr. Lien again said it is to make sure that all the plans, policies and zoning are consistent. Chair Cheung observed that the property owner is clearly still fighting to redevelop the property, and he questioned if Mr. Milosavljevic spoke up when the SMP was changed in 2017. He said he is also concerned about the benefits of the proposed amendment other than for consistency. If there was absolutely no objection to the amendment, he would support it in order to provide consistency. But he has some reservations based on the property owner's concerns. Board Member Lovell cautioned the Board to look at all of the reasons outlined in the Staff Report with respect to consistency for the use of this particular property. It is evident from the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps that the area in question is essentially a dead-end, single-family residential neighborhood. If they are thinking they want to potentially allow the continuation of the existing use or some alternative use other than single-family residential, he does not think it will ever be approved. If they were talking about the feasibility of a real project occurring on the subject parcels, he is not so sure they would be hearing the same discussion. It's also evident from the history that nothing has happened on the site for years other than removal of the wood that continues to pollute Puget Sound. There is an acknowledgement and understanding that, for years and years, the current structures and use have been nonconforming. He said he does not think they would be doing the City justice by putting off the land use change in anticipation of something happening in the future. Chair Cheung said his understanding is that nothing can happen on the site based on the existing land use designation. The Q amendment is simply an administrative change to make the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the SMP. The property Q owner would not be permitted to restore or redevelop the site in either case. .r Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that there are several issues being discussed, and some might be outside of the Board's purview. At their last meeting, Mr. Lien carefully explained the status of the owner in terms of having forfeited the ability to w continue the nonconforming use of the business by failing to meet certain criteria throughout the years. If the property owner had kept his business license and permits up to date, he could have continued to enjoy his nonconforming use. However, it is outside of the Board's purview to speak to that issue. Mr. Lien once again referred to the nonconforming use provision and E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 153 8.1.c explained that if a nonconforming use is discontinued for six consecutive months or twelve months during any two-year period, any subsequent use must be conforming. He explained that, from the property owner's business records, there has not been a use at the site since 2001. Board Member Rubenkonig acknowledged that this is an uncomfortable situation because the property owner would like to be able to implement his vision for the property. However, there are other factors that must be considered. The Board needs to be very clear about the impact of this nonconforming use. He could have enjoyed it through the years and been using it right now, except the licenses and permits to do so were not kept current. Mr. Lien clarified that the property has not been used as a commercial site for years. Nonconforming uses can continue, but they cannot be expanded in any way. There is no record of a commercial use, nonconforming or otherwise, at this site since at least 2001. Board Member Rubenkonig asked how the property owner would challenge the City's interpretation of the nonconforming code. Mr. Lien said the SMP has its own nonconforming code, and ECDC 20.70.010 defines what a nonconforming use is. Nonconforming uses are "shoreline uses which were lawfully established prior to the effective date of the Shoreline Management Act or this master program, or amendments thereto, but which do not conform to the presence regulations or standards of this master program or the policies of the act. " He explained that the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) was passed by the legislature and approved by the voters in 1971, and the Haines Wharf wooden structure was in place long before that time. The metal structure was constructed in 1974-1975, shortly after the SMA was adopted. He doesn't know when the City had its first SMP, but when the permitting went through in 2005, the City had last updated its SMP in 2000. The site has been nonconforming at least since 2000, and from what he can tell, there hasn't been a continued use at the site at least since 2001. Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that is the point that much is hanging off of, that the use wasn't continued. She asked where the property owner would go to get legal redress. Mr. Lien said staff would work with the City Attorney, but the property owner would have to demonstrate that there has been a commercial use at the site continued since 2001. This same question came up when he was reviewing the file in 2008 when the property owner applied for a business license. Board Member Monroe asked if the property owner would have the ability to sue under the Hearing Examiner. Mr. Lien said the Comprehensive Plan amendment would have to be appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board and not to the Hearing Examiner. Barring the proposed amendment, Board Member Monroe asked what recourse the property owner would have if the City denied his permit application. Mr. Lien said it would depend on what the permit was for. Generally, permit decision would be issued by the Hearing Examiner, and that decision would be appealable to the Shoreline Hearings Board. Board Member Monroe summarized that, as long as the property is designated as MUC, the property owner would have some legal recourse to sue for his rights. He asked if the property owner would retain those same rights if the designation is changed to OS. Mr. Lien emphasized that the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would not change the zoning. The current Commercial Waterfront (CW) zoning would remain in place until the City looks at and adjusts the zones along the tidelands. Board Member Monroe pointed out that the City's intent is to change the zoning following the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Lien answered that the property owner would have the right to sue, regardless of the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation, if the argument is that the nonconforming use should be allowed to continue. Board Member Monroe asked if the property owner would have less opportunity or a different avenue to sue if the land use and zoning are changed. Mr. Lien said it would depend on what the application is for. Again, he said the structures and uses are considered nonconforming under the existing SMP, Comprehensive Plan and zoning. Even if the Comprehensive Plan designation is changed, the structures and uses will still be nonconforming, and the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and potential rezone will not change the situation if the structures and uses are found to be nonconforming uses that are allowed to continue. M Board Member Cloutier cautioned that the current proposal is a Comprehensive Plan amendment, and there is no proposal to rezone the property at this time. Board Member Monroe felt this approach was a little disingenuous since they know that a s rezone proposal will be forthcoming. w Board Member Monroe asked if redevelopment of the site in the neighborhood of $5 to $10 million would trigger an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Mr. Lien said he would have to see a proposal before making that determination. E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 154 8.1.c Board Member Monroe asked if a traffic analysis would be required as part of the EIS. Mr. Lien responded that, regardless of whether an EIS is required or not, the property owner would likely be required to complete a traffic analysis. However, without a proposal, he cannot say whether or not traffic improvements would be required. At the request of Mr. Milosavljevic, Mr. Lien read a letter dated March 26, 2009 from Mike Clugston, Senior Planner, into the record: "After extensive review of your existing permit approval for Meadowdale Marina Project (SM0594) and the applicable city and state codes, the City has determined that the timeline for your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is not in danger of expiring. In fact, the timeline for Shoreline Substantial Development Permits has yet to begin according to RCW 90.58.153.4, which states `the permit time periods do not include the time during which a use or activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions or due to the need to obtain any other government permit and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed, including all reasonable related administrative or legal actions on any such permit or approvals. Your Shoreline Permit timeline has not started because you are still seeking any other government permits that authorize marina development to proceed. In this case, two building permits, 20080693 and 20080694, as well as a City business license. That said, we are still awaiting a response to your request for additional information with which to complete our review of the above reference permits. If we do not receive the requested information, the building permits will expire on February 12, 2010, which is 18 months from the date the original application for the permits (August 8, 2008). The fee you submitted for your extension letter will be refunded." Mr. Milosavljevic said he never received a refund for the permit fees, so the City is still obligated to the permit application. Mr. Lien responded that the building permits that were referenced in the letter have expired, and he will research whether or not the fee was refunded. Mr. Lien said that, with the SMP update, there was also a change with regard to timelines and the specific provision referenced in the letter. A section was added (ECDC 24.80.140) to outline time requirements for shoreline permits. It reads that, `Authorization to conduct development activities pursuant to a Shoreline Permit issued by the City of Edmonds shall expire five years after the date of issuance provided the activity was not pursued due to impendency of administrative appeals or legal action. " He summarized that, if it takes more than five years to get all the required permits, the Shoreline approval goes away. With regards to the 2009 letter, there are questions as to whether or not the applicant continued to pursue the other permits, and that would be a legal matter that would come up again should the property owner reapply. Board Member Rubenkonig commented that the status of the nonconforming structure and use has nothing to do with the proposed amendment to change the land use designation to OS. The property owner could still seek recourse for his standing as having an active, nonconforming use and/or structure. Mr. Lien agreed that the nonconforming status is separate from the proposed amendment. Mr. Milosavljevic submitted an additional document for the record. Mr. Lien said the document is the hydraulic project a- approval from the WSDFW. The issue date was October 29, 2012, and the project expiration date was October 28, 2017. M The project name was Meadowdale Marine Upgrades, and the project description was to replace the timber pier, approach N trestle and timber piles with concrete/steel construction. The document also notes a 5-year Hydraulic Project Approval c (11PA) at the request of Rachel Villa on August 18, 2011, which supersedes all other previous HPA's. However, this most r recent HPA expired on August 28, 2017, so the permit is no longer valid. Mr. Milosavtjevic commented that according to the Q documentation he submitted, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is still valid. These other documents extended Q the expiration date. .r Chair Cheung said it does not appear that the property owner's rights would be impacted by the proposed amendment. The s only way he can actually move forward with his proposal is by bringing a lawsuit. Mr. Lien said the property owner is w making arguments under the nonconforming code. The property is nonconforming now, and it will remain nonconforming regardless of the land use designation. Chair Cheung said the property owner will not be able to apply for any permits through the City, and the only way for him to move his project forward is through legal action. Regardless of whether or not E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 155 8.1.c the Comprehensive Plan is amended to be consistent with the SMP, the property owners remedy or course of action will remain the same. Board Member Monroe said his understanding is that, as long as the property is designated as MUC, the property owner can apply for a permit. It will get denied, and then he can go through the appeal process. If the designation is changed to OS, the property owner would not have the ability to even apply for a permit. Mr. Lien said that is incorrect. He does not know what the property owner's proposal will be, but given that the site is nonconforming and has been nonconforming since 2001, his approach would remain the same regardless of the zoning or Comprehensive Plan change. The structures and uses are nonconforming under the current zoning and SMP, and have been at least since 2000. That will not change with any action the Board takes tonight or if the City Council ultimately adopts the amendment. Board Member Monroe asked if there is any chance the property owner would be able to tear down the existing facility and rebuild. Mr. Lien answered no. As per the nonconforming code, the building would be destroyed more than 75% of the replacement value. If the building is removed, it could not be reconstructed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (FILE NUMBER AMD20180011) FROM MIXED USE COMMERCIAL TO OPEN SPACE FOR THE WATERFRONT AREA CURRENTLY DESIGNATED AS HAINES WHARF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION'S BRIEFING MEMORANDUM DATED APRIL 10, 2019, WITH ITS INCLUDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION. Board Member Monroe said he does not necessarily like the marina in its current location, and he can see why it makes sense for it to not be there. However, he does not think this is the right avenue by which to cut off that use of the property. They need to allow the property owner to go through the entire application process in order to say for certain that he would not lose any of his use. He has sympathy for the property owner when the government changed the rules and the property is worth less, and the property owner needs to maintain his full set of resources. Board Member Rubenkonig said the property's nonconformance has no bearing on the current issue before the Board. The property owner would still be able to pursue the nonconforming use of the property on his own, regardless of what the Comprehensive Plan designation is. The property will always be nonconforming, and the owner will have to meet the criteria for nonconformance in order to obtain the necessary permits. However, it is outside of the Board's purview to address that issue and staff cannot respond to what might happen in the future when there is no application to refer to. The property owner can pursue whatever he wants to do with his property, and the amendment would not make any difference. She said she expects it will be difficult to support that he has had an ongoing nonconforming use of the property and the structure, but that is the legal route that he must take and a separate issue than what is before the Board at this time. Once again, Board Member Robles voiced concern that there are too many unknowns for the Board to make a recommendation on the proposed amendment at this time. They do not know for sure whether the proposed amendment will impact the property owner or not. There is too much unsettled on both sides, and he cannot support the amendment. Board Member Cloutier pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan does not have any standing in the property owner's M argument related to use. Zoning is what determines his use. When a zoning change is proposed, it must refer to and align N with the Comprehensive Plan. The SMP update has already changed the property and its allowed uses. The current proposal c is to change the Comprehensive Plan, which does not change the zoning or anything that has to do with his use. While zoning will be the likely next step, it is not something the Board should be focusing on at this time. He reminded the Board Q to focus on the four criteria that must considered when reviewing Comprehensive Plan amendments. In his mind, the Q proposal meets all of the criteria. For clarity, he reviewed the criteria again: .r 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public s interest. w 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and welfare of the City. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. E z 0 c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 156 8.1.c 4. In case of an amendment to the Comprehensive Policy Plan Map, the subject parcels area physically suitable for the requested land use designations(s) and the anticipated land use development(s), including, but not limited to, access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints. Board Member Rubenkonig said there appears to still be confusion around the nonconforming use. She asked Mr. Lien to explained again how the nonconforming use would still be present with any future new zone, and the property owner's standing will not change. Mr. Lien said he is hesitant to say that the nonconforming use would still be present, given that if a nonconforming use is discontinued for six months or twelve months over a two-year period, it would not longer be considered a nonconforming use. From what he has seen in the record, a nonconforming structure is still present, but he questions whether a nonconforming use is still present. However, the Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning would have no bearing on the nonconforming aspect of the property. It is nonconforming now, has been nonconforming, and will continue to be nonconforming. Chair Cheung summarized that the Board's responsibility is to make sure the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the SMP, which is the intent of the proposed amendment. The property owner's rights would not be impacted, and his ability to sue would remain the same. Board Member Monroe asked what criteria will be considered when a rezone proposal comes forward for the property next year. Will they be required to address potential impacts to the property owner? Mr. Lien reviewed the rezone criteria outlined in ECDC 20.40.010 as follows: A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; C. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone; E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Board Member Monroe said he can support the proposed amendment based on the clarification provided by staff and Board Members and given that the Board will have another discussion about value when a rezone is brought forward. 0 m THE MOTION CARRIED 6-1, WITH BOARD MEMBER ROBLES VOTING IN OPPOSITION. a c REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA a Chair Cheung reviewed that the April 24" agenda will include a Vision 2050 Update, a presentation on options to address the an number of units for multifamily in existing multifamily, and a public hearing on an application for a street vacation map N amendment. The May 8" agenda will include a legislative update, as well as a public hearing on potential code amendments c to ECDC 17.40.020 to address nonconformance of existing multifamily development. r L Mr. Lien explained that the City has an official street map that designates future rights -of -way, and the street vacation Q application involves removing the connection from 80' Avenue down to Olympic View Drive. He also explained that options for addressing the number of units for multifamily in existing multifamily were presented to the City Council's Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee on April 9`t'. The nonconforming code says that if a nonconforming structure is s destroyed to more than 75% of the replacement value, it shall be reconstructed in full conformance with the Development w Code, and that includes density. At least 20 multifamily developments have been identified that exceed the density allowed by the zone in which they are located. If they were to burn down, they could only be reconstructed to the current density. Condominium owners are having trouble selling their units because banks won't fund a mortgage if there is a possibility that E z c� a Planning Board Minutes April 10, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 157 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Set Public Hearing for 184th Street SW Street Vacation Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History Manjinder Josan has submitted a petition to vacate a portion of 184th Street SW that lies between 80th Avenue West and Olympic View Drive . The City Council must consider street vacations in a public hearing that has been set by resolution. Staff Recommendation Adopt the resolution in Exhibit 1 to set a public hearing for October 6, 2020. Narrative An easterly portion of 184th Street SW between 80th Avenue West and Olympic View Drive is the subject of this street vacation application. This section of right-of-way was created in 1942 with the Admiralty Acres plat. The right-of-way is 20 feet wide. No City utilities are located within this section of unimproved right-of-way. The applicant, Mr. Josan is the only owner of property that abuts this section of right-of-way. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.070, the City Council is to consider the vacation request at a public hearing that has been set by resolution. Previously, a public hearing on this application was set via Resolution No. 1430, but the public hearing was subsequently postponed with Resolution No. 1432. This was done to ensure the application gave appropriate consideration to how future development of the site may affect which portion of 184th Street SW should be vacated. In addition to the subject street vacation application, there is also an official street map amendment application associated with the property. The official street map amendment includes eliminating a planned right-of-way through the subject site. The future right-of-way needs will be met with the future subdivision application and can be seen on Exhibit 2. To clarify, the processing of both the street vacation and official street map amendment applications is necessary to prepare for the future formal subdivision application on the site. As street vacations and street map amendments are Type V legislative processes, review of those applications must occur prior to the subdivision application. However, due to development complexities of the site, the exact location of which portions 184th Street SW may be vacated (along with future dedications to expand the width of 184th Street SW in other locations) cannot be determined until detailed review of the proposed subdivision has been completed. Other complexities include locations of existing and realigned public utilities on the site which will require easements. Exhibit 2 contains a color coded map that shows the Packet Pg. 158 9.1 potential street vacation, official street map amendment, and utility easements. In accordance with ECDC 20.70.070, the resolution provided in Exhibit 1 will set a public hearing date of October 6, 2020. Staff will present an overview of the applications and review process at the September 1 Council meeting but details and discussion will be reserved for the October 6th public hearing. The application materials associated with the street vacation request are attached. Staff will prepare a staff report and recommendation for the Council's consideration at the public hearing. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Draft ResolutionSetting October 6, 2020 Public Hearing Exhibit 2: Color Coded Site Plan Exhibit 3: Land Use Application Exhibit 4: Petition for Street Vacation Exhibit 5: Vicinity Map Exhibit 6: Application Cover Letter Exhibit 7: Appraisal Packet Pg. 159 9.1.a RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 184T" STREET SW BETWEEN 80TH AVENUE W AND OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.050 authorizes a street vacation process to be initiated by the petition of the owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has received a petition from all of the property owners abutting the portion of 1841h Street SW requested for vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires the city council to fix a time by resolution for public hearing on any proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires that such hearing occur no less than twenty days and no more than sixty days after the passage of the resolution fixing the hearing date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be scheduled for October 6, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. before the Edmonds City Council. Section 2. The city clerk shall provide notice of the public hearing as required pursuant to RCW 35.79.020 and ECDC 20.70.090 to the extent that such notice requirements are applicable. RESOLVED this 1st day of September, 2020. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 1 APPROVED: MAYOR, MIKE NELSON Packet Pg. 160 9.1.b w X I I I L I - -J I I I I I I I I I I U, 0 SEC 18, TWP 27N, RGE 5E, WM I I \ I I I I \\ I I I N \\\ I °° ry9h tip° ry�h tip° " \ 4 II s I SS - _T- r-- -- -- -- I /Sf(EASEM _wow-w- I z� / I� \� I w wow-w O ` I �i ti$°/ "/ / )D \ I I /r- 0000, LOT\ � 7 I - \0\ 1-1 �V,1o895\.\3S.F.OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT es LOT 4 �14,665 S.F. 4 I I I .oso 30' SANITARY /I // 0�SID SEWER EASEMENT / 30'--DRAINAGE EASEMENT I, 001, I I I �9 I I I \ w -- SOS. / �- // �- \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 I 38.*o, \ \ IIII I I I 0- I WATER WE N � � �_ \ \ \ \ \ / /t6T \\, 12,231-S.Fy LOT 1 cc; ,// LOT 2 \\ LOT 13\\ \,-�11I� I ► I I I J 12,016 S.F. 12,004 S.F. I 12,11 SIF. \ i // //// /� \ i 1 4! I II I I I 0 _- - 1 / I \� -� � �/ / % I I 1 1 III III I I GRAPHIC SCALE �' / LOT XI I III III I I 50 0 25 50 1 84.311.E 2g.2 35.6. 102.2' 12,087 S.FI\ \ I I I III IIII I I 124.0' / / I / FUTURE PEl N I I I I 1 1 1 I I ' Ac\ SS EASEME \ \ 11 11 II11 II II II 11 II 1 =50 EXISTING I / 1 1 \ N 9107'0 wW I 303.0' T - �` \ RIGHT-OF-WAY I I I 1 I 13 .oQ 1 I O �_---- 30 - 1 \--------- 1 ti° z5 30 , � F VA`FA� 1 1 1 ?5 320 II LOT 81G�T \ Y�\A� 1 1 11111 1 •oo'18wW II \ I \ \ \ 12,192 S.F. 1\ \ 1\ \\ \\ 1\ 111\ 111 II \I II I12 915, I I I\ 1 1 1\\ 111 1 1 1 I I \ I I \ I I ;, 11\ - \ 1 1 11613'1 I. I I� -� �� I I 1 \ I I I I \ 13410' I 10 \ 2\ I I LOT 14/ 1 I�� \ I I I I IIII I 1 I \ \ \ \( 1 1 12 407 S.F] - - -- -- -- � 13 \ \ \ \ / I \ I LOT 9 I III II II I I I I 1 \ \ I \ \ \ �/ / I \ I 1 I I 1 13,077 S.F. 1 1 1 1 11 \\\ \ \ 1 I / I \ g I I \ \ 114.8 CID i I I LOT 13 --------------- I 14 // \ II i \ 13,311 S.F. // I \\ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ I LOT 1\0 24.0 I I - /� �� \ 13,219 S.Il \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ U % 119.4' g L------ I / I J------- TRACT 997 I 6,983 .F. 131A� \ 1 20.0' 159.9' \ \ 1 1 1 I 1 \ \ 0/1 \ N LOT 11 7 - I LOTI 12 // 00 I� 13,721 S.F. - -- r---- - - - - - Ui\\ 120�2s.F. 16 \24.0' 142.0' -� 158.0' \ \ \ \ I \ \ 6 o 17 w 18 19 20 �X . 2� \ \ \I \ \-----{ - rw w w w w-� f9 I w 18 5 TH P LSW 1 BREAKDOWN OF IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS SURFACES Pre -developed Basin Area = 4.95 ac Existing Gravel Drive 3,600 sf = 0.08 ac Existing asphalt 184`h 2,420 sf = 0.06 ac Existing 2"d growth forest = 4.61 ac Existing Buildings Two - SFR's 2,620 sf = 0.06 ac (Lot 4 will retain ex SFR) Lawn and Landscape = 0.14 ac Total = 4.95 ac Developed Basin Area = 4.95 ac Proposed Cul-de-Sac Asphalt = 0.29 ac Fire Lane Tract 999 = 0.16 ac Driveways = 0.70 ac Sidewalks = 0.13 ac Building Lots Buildings 14 total roofs = 0.84 ac Lawn and Landscape = 1.66 ac Lawn at Cul-de-Sac = 0.13 ac Retain Existing 2"d growth forest = 1.04 ac Total = 4.95 ac PROJECT APPLICANT: JOSAN MAJINDER 132 143RD STREET SW LYN N WOOD, WA 98087 425-750-6606 PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE: BRIAN R. LINDSAY 2221 EVERETT AVENUE, SUITE 203 EVERETT, WA 98201 425-259-5556 ZONING INFORMATION: CURRENT ZONING - R97-28 PROPOSED ZONING - R12 SITE AREAS: AREA 215,472 SQ FT = 4.95 AC 15 LOTS PROPOSED MIN. LOT SIZE = 12,002 S.F MAX. LOT SIZE = 14,544 S.F. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: -o 0 180TH ST SW > w a Q o SITE 0 N 184TH ST SW w Q 88TH ST SW 7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE PARCEL # 00370800100900 LOT 9, BLOCK 1 OF THE PLAT OF ADMIRALITY ACRES AS RECRODED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 832826, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 18408 79TH AVENUE WEST PARCEL # 00370800101000 LOT 10, BLOCK 1 OF THE PLAT OF ADMIRALITY ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 832826, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY , STATE OF WASHINGTON. 18325 80TH AVENUE WEST PARCEL # 00370800101100 LOT 11, BLOCK 1, OF THE PLAT OF ADMIRALITY ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, AS RCORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 832826, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. NO ADDRESS PARCEL # 00434600010601 LOT 1, BLOCK 0, OF THE PLAT OF EDMONDS SEAVIEW TRACTS AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 75, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 106003, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 106 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF BEVERLY PARK ROAD, LESS THE EAST 212 FEET AND LESS COUNTY ROAD. EXISTING SOIL: ALDERWOOD-EVERETT GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM EXISTING VEGETATION: TREES WITH SOME UNDERBRUSH WITH LAWN AND LANDSCAPE PROPOSED VEGETATION: 20% TO REMAIN FORESTED LAWN AND LANDSCAPING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: LOT SIZE: 12,407 SF AVERAGE DRIVEWAY: 800 SF = 0.02 AC BUILDING: 5,200 SF = 0.12 AC LAWN / LANDSCAPE: = 0.04 AC INFILTRATION / BIO-RETENTION AREA 30' x 10' x4' DEEP © Copyright 2016 by Brian R. Lindsay, BRL Services LLC. Design, map, text and data may not be used, copied or reproduced in any way without express written permission of Brian R. Lindsay, BRL Services LLC. VICINITY MAP z 0 SCALE 1" = 2000' w 7-17-2020 AM re, 'A m o z w U < w C� IC-) CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SPECIALIST BRIAN LINDSAY r ` BRL SERVICES LLC 2221 EVERETT AVE, SUITE 203 ``1 EVERETT, WA 98201 `� 1-- 425-259-5556 Z Q ENGINEER o TED TREPANIER U BRL SERVICES LLC 2221 EVERETT AVE, SUITE 203 C� z EVERETT, WA 98201 425-259-5556 0� z � z BENCH MARK - DATUM (NAVD 88) w NGVD 29 = NAVD 88 - 3.17 z Q BENCHMARK: TOP OS SURFACE BRASS CAP PI MONUMENT 79THAVE WEST AND 79TH PLACE WEST. ELEVATION 343.68 CITY OF EDMONDS DATUM (MEAN LOWER LOW WATER) SHEET INDEX 1. SITE PLAN / EXISTING CONDITIONS 2. ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 3. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 4. ROAD AND STORM NOTES AND DETAILS 5. GRADING PLAN 6. GRADING PLAN 7. SEWER AND WATER PLAN 8. SEWER AND WATER PLAN 9. SEWER PROFILES 10. SEWER AND WATER NOTES AND DETAILS 11. T.E.S.C. PLAN 12. T.E.S.C. PLAN 13. T.E.S.C. NOTES AND DETAILS 14. 20% VEGETATION AREAS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: CITY ENGINEER DIVISION Q L W L Ld W to L0 N L0 C � Lr) O w -.2~ N tf Neu N 45 Qw� �zQ wog [if d W LLj CN N Z O O 0 O Z o N w 3r c 0 r L co co as L co t 00 am C d as co c 2 a m 0 c) `0 w m s a SHEET: REV: OF 14 Packet Pg. 161 1 9.1.c 1 City of Edmonds Land Use Application •' ivc -I 201S f- t _A11 NTERRMCES cou A i-i ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT L� - L CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # fW ^w19061 ZONE " LZ F HOME OCCUPATION DATE } '�I �4 REC'D BY L FORMAL SUBDIVISION F SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE RECEIPT # LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT X OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT L HE STAFF PB ADB { X STREET VACATION REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION J OTHER: • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION . 7707 Olympic View Dr PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) MJ Edmonds Plat PROPERTY OWNER Manjinder Josan PHONE # 425-750-6606 ADDRESS 132 143rd St_ SW, Lynnwood WA 98087 E-MAIL mjosan@gmail.com FAX # n/a 00370800100900,00370800101000, TAX ACCOUNT # 00370800101100, 00434600010601 SEC. 18 TwP. 27N RNG. 5E DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) . Official street map amendment and stree vacation DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) as requested by City of Edmonds APPLICANT Manjinder Josan PHONE # 425-750-6606 ADDRESS 132 143rd St SW, Lynnwood WA 98087 E-MAIL mJosan mail.com FAX # n/a CONTACT PERSON/AGENT BRL Services LLC PHONE # 425-259-5556 ADDRESS 2221 Everett Ave ste# 203 E-MAIL brian@brlservicesllc.com FAX # n/a The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE 3/19/19 Property Owner's Authorization I, �A {3r,7p i ,..� O� S -�\ �.i _ , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. ` q SIGNATURE OF OWNER �� — DATE / % I If `7' '�f S - - Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application Pag Packet Pg. 162 9.1.d PETITION FOR STREET OR ALLEY VACATION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON We, the undersigned owners of two-thirds of the al property abutting 'Pon public right-of-way described below, Pwsvarrt to RCW 35.79.010, re do hereby petition the City of Edmonds to vacate said public nght-of-way, described as follows: all situate in the City of Edmonds. County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and request that said City Camci . by Resoles 5z a uine and place when this Petition shall be heard and determmed by that authority, which time shad not be more than sixty (60) days nor +less than twenty (20) &ys after the passage of such Resolution These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considezed as one Petition and may be filed with other pages eonmining additional agnahrres which emnulatively may be considered as a single Petition - WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs move than me Of #here pe=Ons, or signs a peaum seeking an election whoa he or she a not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is othmwise not qualified to sing, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdmumnor. PRAYER OF PETITION: For the vacation of Page. of MACPerncrn0WOV- e FL.ESV.%-" aWMLSC M M n cr 0 =CQ m _o M Cn Packet Pg. 163 182ND PL SW OPENED R/W * 7914 18203 7822 # 81114 18208 * 18213 8115 * 18218 # 0 w z Li 8117 18226 * 0 18227 3 Li * 18335 8041 8001 # 184TH ST SW OPENED R/W 7821 * 7817 0 w z * 7809 a 47816 O 7810 * 3 w 5 U a * 18321 * 18305 0 vow 7704 OLYM P I C,o - VIEW DRIVE PARCEL # *040 00370800100900 18332 - oe 004v 95,230 SOFT 11po 8325 80TH/ 18408 79TH VENUE WEST AVENUE WEST ARCEL # 95,230 SOFT PARCEL # 0370800101100 00 0800101000 20,607 — 1841416 1618405 UNKNOWN ADDRESS PARCEL # 1841616 # 18415 00434600010601 18418 * 97,372 SOFT 418419 18426 16 1618427 VICINITY MAP 18212 # 18214 * 1 * 18216 18218 # 1822 183 GRAPHIC SCALE 150 0 75 150 18301 # 1 "=150' - VACATION UNOPENED R/W 2,727 SOFT w z w 7601 * a 3 Q 18401 1618432 1 18501 16 18508 * 1850� 106 * 8034 * * 3 7811 � - 7831 * # # # 7801 18512 7817 18516 w a 185TH PL SW OPENED R/W'$QQ 18510 '� 18521 101 18 o 18521 102 * *10 3 * 7802 7810# 18530 * 18521 1044 105 1 0- )1 # 7818 # 18521. BLDG * * 16 8035 790 * 118 18521 1074 0 7939 7925 7915 * * 7805 18596 * 18521 1091 7 186TH PL SW OPENED R/W 18521 110 18604 # # 18605 * 18601 18604 # 18603 BLDG 18603 1 f # _ � Ana (RECEIVED MAR 2 12019 DEVEWPIAENT SERVICES COUNTER Legend Parcel ID Snohomish Parcels Packet Pg. 164 9.1.f ryc ffRz services .z An Engineering Company March 21, 2019 City of Edmonds City Council Office — City Hall 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 ATTN: To whom it may concern RE: 7707 Olympic View Dr— Manjinder Josan Subject: Street Vacation (Petition) To whom it may concern: RJECEIVLL) MAR 2 i zoo DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER I respectfully request that you accept this petition for the Street Vacation to vacate the existing Right -of - Way as required for the development of the proposed MJ Edmonds Plat. See attached Site Plan. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincerely, Brian R Lindsay Owner of BRL Services LLC Agent for Manjinder Josan 2221 Everett Ave., Suite 203, Everett, WA. 98201 PH: 425-259-5556 draftstation @ea rth I ink.net Packet Pg. 165 9.1.g jaw� LU W T N y . Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 2927 Colby Avenue, Suite 100 Everett, WA 98201 425-258-2611 425-252-1210fax www,valbridae.com 18-0323 OlympicView.docx /191619 Packet Pg. 166 9.1.g Valbridge Corporate Office Smith Tower 1 ' PROPERTY ADVISORS 506 2nd Avenue suite 1001 Puget Sound Seattle, WA 98104 206-209-3016 phone 425-688-1819tax March 14, 2019 Mr. Manjinder Josan PD NW Investment, LLC 800 NW 85th Street Seattle, WA 98117 2927 Colby Avenue 18728 Bothell Way NE 419 Berkeley Avenue Suite 100 Suite B Suite A Everett, WA 98201 Bothell, WA 98011 Hrcrest, WA 98466 425-258-2611 phone 425-450-4040 phone 253-274-0099 phone 425-252-1210fax 425-688-1819fax 425-688-1819fax valbrldge.com RE: Appraisal of 4.90 acres of residentially -zoned land, located at 18325 801h Avenue W and 7704 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington (Our File #18-0323). Dear Mr. Josan: As requested, we have conducted inspections of the above -referenced property and prepared our analysis of current market data for forming an opinion of market value for the subject property in the "as is" condition, both before and after a proposed right-of-way vacation, as part of the development of a 14-lot residential subdivision. Your attention is invited to the following report for the narrative description, analyses and conclusions of value. The subject property consists of a 4.90-acre site (according to the site plan) on the west side of Olympic View Drive and east side of 80th Avenue W, in the City of Edmonds. As currently configured, it is bisected into non-contiguous parcels by 20-foot wide unimproved right-of-way running east -west ,n (known in the original Admiralty Acres plat as Olympic Avenue). Zoning is RS-12, a Residential Single- a family designation by the city which primarily allows detached single family residences on lots no a smaller than 12,000 SF. The land is currently improved with a 2,918 SF residence built in 1976 and 1,974 SF residence built in 1959. The property owner intends to demolish the structures and develop a 14-lot single family w residential plat, utilizing most of the unimproved Olympic Avenue right-of-way for a new street, identified as 184th Place SW. Without the proposed right-of-way vacation, the owner can develop a E 14-lot subdivision with average lot size of 13,208 SF. As proposed, the property owner would utilize the easterly 2,230 SF of unimproved right-of-way for development, with the north half of the acquired r area encumbered by a 10-foot wide pedestrian access easement connecting the end of the cul-de-sac r Q to Olympic View Drive. The increased area would allow the property owner to have more development flexibility and increase average lot size to 13,383 SF. This appraisal was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and is intended to conform to the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (UASFLA). Complete descriptions of properties used for comparison are included in this report, as well as all our analyses and conclusions. The value conclusions herein are given subject to the specific assumptions and limiting conditions stated immediately following this transmittal letter. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 2 Packet Pg. 167 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound March 14, 2019 Mr. Manjinder Josan Page 2 Based on the investigation and analysis of all the elements which reasonably affect value, we have formed the opinion that market value of the subject property, as of October 16, 2018, is: Market Value Before Acquisition....................................................................................$2,240,000 Market Value After Acquisition.......................................................................................$2,247,000 MarketValue Difference............................................................................................................. $7,000 Sincerely, Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 7 Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Paul C. Bird, Senior Associate WA State Certified - General Appraiser No. 1100517 WA State Certified - General Appraiser No. 1100902 Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 2 Packet Pg. 168 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound TABLE OF CONTENT OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................I EXECUTIVESUMMARY ......................... ...........................,...................................................................................... 1 SUMMARYOF CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................... .............3 LOCATIONMAP.....................................................................................................................................................4 SUBJECTPROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS......................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................8 DEFINITION OF AN APPRAISAL ......................... ........................................ .. .. ........................................ .................. 8 DEFINITIONS.......__......................................................................................................................................................8 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.........................................................................................................................8 LEGALDESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................................................9 PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL/APPRAISAL PROBLEM.............................................................................................................10 PROPERTYRIGHTS APPRAISED.........................................................................................................................................10 INTENDEDUSE OF THE APPRAISAL....................................................... ............................................................................ 10 CLIENT........ ......................... ..................................... ..................................................................................10 INTENDEDUSERS ...................... ............ .................................. ..............................................................................10 SCOPEOF THE APPRAISAL...............................................................................................................................................10 EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................................................................10 HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................................11 EXPOSURETIME ............................................. ...................................................................................................11 COMPETENCYOF THE APPRAISERS...................................................................................................................................11 DATES OF INSPECTION/VALUATION..................................................................................................................................11 DATEOF REPORT ................................................ I ............................ .............................................................................11 FIVE-YEAR OWNERSHIP HISTORY.....................................................................................................................................11 ACCOMPANIMENTBY OWNER.........................................................................................................................................12 MARKETAREA DATA............................................................................................................................................13 LOCATION...................................................................................................................................................................13 ECONOMY...................................................................................................................................................................15 POPULATION...............................................................................................................................................................16 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MARKET ........................................... ............................................. .............. ........................ 16 APARTMENTMARKET...................................................................................................................................................17 RETAILREAL ESTATE MARKET........................................................... .............................................................................. 17 OFFICEMARKET ..................................................... ........................ ............................................................ .................. 17 INDUSTRIALMARKET .................................. .................................... .............................................................................. 18 SOCIALINFLUENCES....................................................................................................................................................19 ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES........................................................................................................................................19 SUMMARY.................... ................... ..................................................... ................ ............ ....................................... ...19 SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION).......................................................................................................................20 GENERALLOCATION......................................................................................................................................................20 LANDAREA/ACCESS.....................................................................................................................................................20 TOPOGRAPHY/DRAINAGE..............................................................................................................................................20 WETLANDS.................................................................................................................................................................. 21 SITEPLAN...................................................................................................................................................................22 SOIL/SUBSOIL CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................22 F0 Mn Q Q Z t K W C N E t V R r Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page i 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 169 9.1.g kill Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT TABLE OF CONTENTS FLOODPLAINS.......................................... ..... ..................................................................................................23 IMPROVEMENTS........................... :............................................................................................................................... 23 UTILITIES....................................................................................................................................................................23 EASEMENTS OR OTHER USE RESTRICTIONS........................................................................................................................24 ASSESSEDVALUE AND TAXES..........................................................................................................................................24 ASSESSOR'S MAP.........................................................................................................................................................25 LANDUSE REGULATIONS...............................................................................................................................................26 ZONING MAP .................... ...................................................................................... ................................................... 27 HIGHEST AND BEST USE (BEFORE ACQUISITION)..................................................................................................28 PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION)................................................................................................... 31 LANDVALUATION.........................................................................................................................................................31 RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE................................................................................................................50 SITE DATA (AFTER ACQUISITION)......................................................................................................................... 52 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TO BE ACQUIRED SITE PLAN (AFTER ACQUISITION) ........................... EFFECTS OF ACQUISITION ..................................... SITE DATA (DESCRIPTION OF REMAINDER) .............. ................................................................................52 ................................................................................ 52 ............................ ,................................................... 53 .......................................................................... I ..... 53 HIGHEST AND BEST USE (AFTER ACQUISITION).................................................................................................... 54 PROPERTY VALUATION (AFTER ACQUISITION)..................................................................................................... 54 DAMAGES.............................................................. SPECIAL BENEFITS .................................................... ... — 54 ......54 RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE..............................................................................................55 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ........................... ......................................................... 56 GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS.........................................................................................57 CERTIFICATION — ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI..................................................................................................... 63 CERTIFICATION — PAUL C. BIRD, SENIOR ASSOCIATE............................................................................................ 64 ADDEN DA............................................................................................................................................................ 65 APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS ...............................................................65 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page ii 1 B-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 170 9.1.g Valbridge irii}}a PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project: Olympic View Drive 14-Lot Plat Ostensible Owner: PD NW Investment, LLC OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Location: Mailing address is 18325 80th Avenue W and 7704 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington, 98026. It is on the west side of Olympic View Drive and east side of 80th Avenue W in the City of Edmonds, just northwest of a small commercial area known as Perrinville. The view amenity is territorial at best. Land Area/Size: Total land area of the irregularly shaped tract is 4.90 acres, according to the site plan, with 595.50 feet of frontage along Olympic View Drive and 115.0 feet along 80th Avenue W; in addition, there is a 20-foot wide right-of-way at the southerly boundary, extending southerly to 185th Place SW. As presently configured, there is a 20-wide unimproved right-of-way between 80th Avenue W and Olympic View Drive which bisects the tract. Topography is undulating, ranging from modest to steep, so development would require earth -moving along with a degree of soil removal and importation. Utilities: All utilities are available including electricity, water, sanitary sewer and natural gas services. Improvements: The land is currently improved with a 2,918 SF residence built in 1976 and 1,974 SF residence built in 1959. The property owner intends to demolish the structures and develop a 14-lot single family residential plat, utilizing most of the unimproved Olympic Avenue right-of-way for a new street identified as 184th Place SW. Without the proposed right-of-way vacation, the owner can develop a 14-lot plat with average lot size of 13,208 SF. Proposed Acquisition: As proposed, the easterly 2,230 SF of unimproved right-of-way is vacated, with the north half of the acquired area encumbered as a 10-foot wide pedestrian access easement, connecting the end of the cul-de-sac to Olympic View Drive. After Acquisitions: In the "after" situation, there is an additional 2,230 SF of land available for development, thus allowing the owner to have more development flexibility and increase average lot size to 13,383 SF. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 1 Packet Pg. 171 9.1.g kll�VaIbridge :?r. PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Legal Characteristics: Zoning is RS-12, a Residential Single-family designation by the city which primarily allows detached single family residences on lots no smaller than 12,000 SF. Dates of Inspection: Highest and Best Use: Appraisers: Date of Report: Date of Valuation: Final Estimates of Value: Various dates in October 2018. Some form of single-family residential subdivision. Robert J. Macaulay, MAI and Paul C. Bird March 14, 2019 October 16, 2018 Market Value Before Acquisition....................................................................................$2,240,000 Market Value After Acquisition.......................................................................................$2,247,000 MarketValue Difference.............................................................................................................$7,000 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 2 Packet Pg. 172 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT AdIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Summary of Conclusions (Accounting tabulation - NOT indicative of appraisal method employed) Indicated Subject Value Before Project Highest and Best Use Before: 14-lot residential subdivision Lund Value Before Amount Rounded 213,241 SF unencumbered @ $10,50 per SF or $160,000 per DU $2,240,000 $2,240,000 0 SF encumbered @ per SF or per DU $0 $0 213,241 total SF @ $10.50 $2,240.000 $2,240,000 Improvement Value Before Structures Not affected Site improvements Not affected TOTAL SUBJECT VALUE BEFORE PROJECT $2,240,000 Indicated Subject Value After Project Highest and Best Use After: 14-lot residential subdivision Land Value After 214,356 SF unencumbered @ $10.50 per SF $160,500 per DU $2,247,000 $2,247,000 1,115 SF encumbered (reflected in unencumbered value estimate) $0 $0 215,471 total SF @ $10.43 $2,247,000 $2,247,000 Improvement Volue Befu Structures Not affected Site improvements Not affected TOTAL SUBJECT VALUE BEFORE PROJECT $2,247,000 Estimated value allocation of rights acquired Land Transfer from city to owner 2,230 SF $500 per DU $7,000 $3.14 per SF , Yv Structures Not affected Site improvements Not affected Total net acquisition $7,000 Plus damages and cost to cure $0 Less special benefits, if any $0 Estimated difference in market value $7,000 r Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 3 Packet Pg. 173 9.1.g Valbridge iYb PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound LOCATION MAP OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT LOCATION MAP ,rtr SoulhWes! 176th St SW .I�--—4..176th Si SW ;nth;^,S+si COunty Paik Sr . N - '-LAAY FdI m JY; 1601h SI SW -U!I P fig E f $ G a if d C, 1$41h $l SVV. Ji.i: Ik. m .,r3 .lf . JI�I ro LJUL li li.., '— Pairirnde Lcti eD 188th 51 SV� Lynntiute Park iOBth St 5W 5z, Reif = `� 51rrra &own Bay iTDk ... nrad .I !i 1� '192nd St SWPark oo�' -���• 7 L if -` I ;r 194th S `Pugel Dr 1951h S1 SW 624=crthur I Lake Park'! r Z Edmonds — � a � 200th .St S`VU' � � ==-2001h Ft wV I � Liti n Ceda � Underwater i a bark — 'Y-12nrui 5'�r' smi C¢tir ry a° m r 4 �" 204th St ;SW — Qalep Plna 1ledels: ���� F var k q dmnrrdsn] b m L.� n �l�. wusrlvt � N 7U4 W d � Vlie-tt Pow ldn•SI. E?.�.o.-li.fn � W1104way j_- Y Yogi Perk st s � ro .0'. :� q C. rn �' �9kd�ln y1�1 Pine St 57 . 216th St SW Fir St r N 218th St SW Elm S A 2241h St a�N � Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlyrnpicView.dou LIW00 yrit NPa"«Il: NCrJINw]r 216th S1 SW 2111h St SW .c c ¢ m � c RS z 2Z Mntirstlake Terrace Page 4 Packet Pg. 174 9.1.g 0\1Valbridge + PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS 1, Looking east from the intersection of 801h Avenue W and 184th Street SW, 2. Interior view of tract, looking north. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 5 Q Packet Pg. 175 f �.�,'� � � � �'•� � fir, • , r . �� Sir ,.• .,' „ 4_y Yw� .`j�`� �' • � •r �� Jar-�- •. - {MM � tea. - '�y4e�y� N `� .f +r�'i.'• .�� _ - 9.1.g 01� Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS 5. Looking west at driveway from Olympic View Drive. 6. Southwesterly view of residence (7704 Olympic View Drive). Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS Page 7 Q Packet Pg. 177 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound INTRODUCTION OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT INTRODUCTION Definition of an Appraisal An appraisal is an unbiased estimate of the nature, quality, value, or utility of an interest in, or aspect of, identified real estate and related personalty. Appraisal involves selective research into appropriate market areas; the assemblage of pertinent data; the application of appropriate analytical techniques; and the use of knowledge, experience and professional judgment to develop an appropriate solution to the appraisal problem. Definitions Market Value Market value is defined as, "...the amount in cash, or on terms reasonably equivalent to cash, for which in all probability the property would have sold on the effective date of the appraisal, after a reasonable exposure time on the competitive market, from a willing and reasonably knowledgeable seller to a willing and reasonably knowledgeable buyer, with neither acting under any compulsion to buy or sell, giving due consideration to all available uses of the property at the time of the appraisal."1 Fee Simple Interest Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power and escheat. 2 Gross Sellout Value Gross sellout value —also known as "sum of the retail values" —is defined:3 as the sum of the separate and distinct market value estimates for each of the units in a condominium, subdivision development, or portfolio of properties, as of the date of valuation. The aggregate of retail values does not represent the value of all the units as though sold together in a single transaction; it is simply the total of the individual market value conclusions. Identification of the Subject Property The subject property consists of a 4.90-acre site (according to the site plan) on the west side of Olympic View Drive and east side of 801h Avenue W, in the City of Edmonds. As currently configured, it is bisected into non-contiguous parcels by 20-foot wide unimproved right-of-way running east -west (known in the original Admiralty Acres plat as Olympic Avenue). Zoning is RS-12, a Residential Single- family designation by the city which primarily allows detached single family residences on lots no smaller than 12,000 SF. 1 Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, Page 30, Section B-2, prepared by the Interagency Land Acquisition Conference-2000. 2 TheApprarsal of Real Estate, Fourteenth Edition, 2013, Appraisal Institute. 3 The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, 2013, Appraisal Institute, page 226 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 8 a rL a x w c m E z U a r Q Packet Pg. 178 9.1.g Vafbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT INTRODUCTION The land is currently improved with a 2,918 SF residence built in 1976 and 1,974 SF residence built in 1959. The property owner intends to demolish the structures and develop a 14-lot single family residential plat, utilizing most of the unimproved Olympic Avenue right-of-way for a new street, identified as 184th Place SW. Without the proposed right-of-way vacation, the owner can develop a 14-lot subdivision with average lot size of 13,208 SF. As proposed, the property owner would utilize the easterly 2,230 SF of unimproved right-of-way for development and for a 10-wide pedestrian access easement, the increased area would allow the property owner to have more development flexibility and increase average lot size to 13,383 SF. Legal Description Below is a legal description of the subject property, as excerpted from a December 2016 Quit Claim Deed. PARCEL A: TRACTS, ACCORDING TO TH TRACT 106, EDMOMDS SEA VIEW RECORDED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 76, RECORDS OF $NQHdSRf§H: oV ► WASHINGTON; ` EXCEPT THE EAST 212 FEET, ~ r + AND EXCEPT PORTION FOR ROAD. f PARCEL B: LOT 9,.BLOCK 1, ADMIRALTY ACRES, .ACrnJ)ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED .I06LUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, RLL RDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WRSHINI�TON. . PAR -Q: LOT 26, BLOCk x,'AD61"LTY ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT.THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME_.1-1 OF, . S, PACE 48, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY,. WASHINQToN.• 4' PARCEL D-1:; LOT 11, BLOCK It, AgMIRAL ( AI :RCS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 60 PLATS,'A,,E'4$,,RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 126-fJEET THER60F:. PARCEL D-2: y THE EAST 120 FEET OF LOT 1I,;'SL6%1J"ADMIRALTY ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN 11!OILUME 12 OF PLOtt PAGE 48, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 9 Packet Pg. 179 9.1.g .990h6- Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Appraisal/Appraisal Problem The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate market value of the subject property (1) in the "as is" condition, and (2) after a proposed right-of-way vacation of 2,230 SF. Property Rights Appraised This appraisal sets forth an opinion regarding the fee simple interest. Intended Use of the Appraisal The client intends to use the appraisal to estimate market value in the "before" and "after' situations, for the purpose of establishing a reasonable compensation amount to the City of Edmonds. Client The client is PD NW Investment, LLC, whose governing member is Manjinder Josan. Intended Users The intended users of this report are the client and those parties assigned by the client. Scope of the Appraisal The appraisal included personal inspection of the subject tract on various dates in October 2018. Information was gathered on the neighborhood, local and regional market conditions; analysis of market supply and demand; determination of highest and best use and preparation of value estimates by the Sales Comparison Approach. Transactions in the immediate and competing areas involving properties similar to the subject were investigated and the following criteria were utilized in comparing the sale properties to the subject: date of sale, zoning and land use regulations, location, view, site utility, size, topography, frontage, soil conditions and other pertinent factors. Confirmation of the terms of sale entailed contact with the buyer, seller or broker handling the transaction. Supplemental information was obtained from public records as well as Costar Realty Information Inc., Northwest Multiple Listing Service (NMLS) and Commercial MLS, all of which are market data services which provide and confirm information on real estate sale transactions. Extraordinary Assumptions This term is defined as an assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. It presumes as fact otherwise uncertain information about the legal, physical or economic characteristics of the subject property. A key assumption is that lot yield is unchanged before and after the proposed right-of-way vacation, according to the site plans herein. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 10 Packet Pg. 180 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT INTRODUCTION Hypothetical Conditions This term is defined as a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraisers to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is used for the purpose of analysis. The hypothetical condition herein is the analysis of the property in the "after" situation. Exposure Time An exposure period is the estimated length of the time property interest being appraised has been offered on the market prior to a hypothetical rent at market value as of the effective appraisal date. Out of the comparable sales considered for analysis, seven were listed for sale on the open market and exposure times ranged from 6 days to almost 16 months, averaging 129 days or four to five months. Recognizing these transactions, along with discussions with brokers and investors knowledgeable of this property type, the exposure period for property similar to the subject in most attributes, including size, is estimated at three to six months at market value. Competency of the Appraisers Robert J. Macaulay, MAI and Paul C. Bird have appraised numerous residentially zoned sites throughout the greater Puget Sound region and are qualified to complete this assignment and provide a reliable estimate of market value. Additional information regarding appraisal experience and qualifications is presented at the end of this report. No one else provided substantive assistance in the appraisal process and report preparation. Dates of Inspection/Valuation The subject property was inspected on various dates in October 2018. The date of valuation is October 16, 2018. Date of Report March 14, 2019 Five -Year Ownership History The property was earlier listed in March 2014 for $3,000,000, then reduced to $2,200,000, and the listing expired in September 2014. This tract included the subject property and an adjacent 0.66-acre parcel owned by the city, and there had been plans for a 25-lot plat on the combined assemblage; however, the city elected not to sell its parcel, effectively stopping this particular development. In December 2015, the subject property was acquired via Quit Claim Deed by a trustee of the US Bankruptcy Court under Auditor's File No. 201512030368. It was placed back on the market in October 2015 for $1,700,000, then reduced to $1,380,000. In August 2016, the property was placed under contract and it closed in December 2016 at an agreed - upon price of $1,100,000. The current owner is PD NW Investment, LLC. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 11 Packet Pg. 181 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ua I bridge INTRODUCTION PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Accompaniment by Owner Paul C. Bird had telephone conversations on various dates with the property owner, Manjinder Josan, who declined accompaniment. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 12 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 182 9.1.g Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound MARKET AREA DATA OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT MARKET AREA DATA A piece of property is an integral part of its neighborhood. An appraisal must consider the environmental, social and economic forces currently influencing the district to ascertain probable trends and the neighborhood's influence on the subject property. Location The larger market area is defined as all of Snohomish County and the immediate market area is the Edmonds urban growth area (UGA). Snohomish County is located along Puget Sound, in the north central portion of western Washington, between Skagit County to the north and King County to the south. Snohomish County is the third most populous county in the state behind King and Pierce counties. The Seattle metropolitan region (King, Pierce and Snohomish counties), as of April 2018, contained 52.1% of the state's total population of 7,427,570. The county encompasses approximately 2,100 square miles, of which 43%± (to the east) includes portions of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest and the Glacier Peak Wilderness Area. Most of the population is concentrated in the foothills of the Cascades and the Puget Sound lowlands. The City of Edmonds is situated along the eastern shore of Puget Sound, midway between the cities of Seattle and Everett (see comprehensive plan map on following page). The S.68-square mile town is in the southwestern corner of Snohomish County. The principal geographic feature of Edmonds is its waterfront location and resulting outstanding water and mountain views. The city lies generally south of 156th Street SW, west of 76th Avenue W and north of the King -Snohomish county line. Also included within city limits is Swedish Medical Center Edmonds Campus (formerly Stevens Memorial) and, to the southeast, there is an incorporated area between Highway 99, Lake Ballinger and 244th Street SW. Topography within the city limits is generally sloping upward from Puget Sound, leveling out to an undulating bench land. The western part of the city has good to excellent westerly sound and mountain views. Main east -west commercial thoroughfares include Edmonds Way (State Route 104), Main Street and 196th Street SW (State Route 524). Main north -south arterials include Highway 99, 5th Avenue, 9th Avenue and 76th Avenue W. Freeway access is good; there are interchanges approximately one-half mile east of the city at 220th Street SW and 244th Street SW. Most of the land in Edmonds is residential in character. Residences are primarily single family, but there is a growing multi -family segment in and around downtown, most of which are condominiums. Multi- family dwellings are also found around Swedish Edmonds Medical Center and along or near major thoroughfares. There are few manufacturing and industrial land uses in the city. The most prevalent commercial development is along Highway 99, where there is a diverse mix of commercial enterprises. Away from Highway 99, predominant commercial uses are neighborhood shopping centers along Edmonds. In the central business district, most commercial development consists of small offices and shops, in keeping with the city's small town atmosphere. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 13 Q Packet Pg. 183 9.1.g Valhridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT MARKET AREA DATA - City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Map Plan D**ntlw1 Plan Overlap Gl•w.w.or/ f�/rre�rl A . j�Y rinsrr - Ow. - ..�7-y ... w w f 1— �1+ 3 r• •i. T Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 14 Q Packet Pg. 184 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT jll Valbridge MARKET AREA DATA PROPFRTY ADVISORS ,di JOlanu Economy The jobless rate for the Seattle metropolitan district (King and Snohomish counties) has declined to the point where there is a labor shortage. As seen below, the labor force and employment have grown. Employment Trends - Seattle-Reliew- up-FvPrPtt Metropolitan District Unemployment rate 1 4.1% 4.0% 3.5% Labor force 1,629,329 1,669,438 1,697,661 % growth 2.5% 1.7% Employment 1,562,740 1,601,890 1,638,635 % growth 2.5% 2.3% Source: State of Washington Employment Security Department Below is a summary from the June 2018 Puget Sound Economic Forecaster. Summary Forecast - Puget Sound Region 0• Growth Factors Employment 3.2% 2.5% 2.4% 1.0% Personal income (current dollars) 7.5% 4.1% 4.6% 5.1% Consumer price index 2.2% 3.0% 1.9% 2.3% Housing permits (number) -4.9% 8.5% -7.1% -11.5% Housing permits ($ amounts) -5.1% 15.1% -4.7% -3.5% Average home price 9.8% 11.8% 4.8% -1.1% Average apartment rent 9.0% 8.1% 4.8% -1.1% Retail sales 4.9% 4.8% 4.1% 4.0% Population 1.7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.2% Other Data Unemployment rate 4.5% 4.2% 4.1% 4.0% Housing permits (thousands) 25.8 28.0 26.0 23.1 Single family 10.9 10.9 9.9 9.7 Multi -family 15.7 17.1 16.2 13.4 Housing permits (millions $) $5,340.5 $6,146.1 $5,858.2 $5,655.5 Single family $3,327.8 $3,557.6 $3,391.1 $3,479.0 Multi -family $2,012.7 $2,588.5 $2,467.1 $2,176.5 Average home price (thousands $) $466.3 $521.4 $546.4 $540.5 Active home listings (thousands) 7.9 6.4 5.7 6.4 Home sales (thousands) 71.2 73.4 62.6 58.7 Apartment vacancy rate (%) 3.4% 3.8% 4.0% 4.2% Average apartment rent ($) 1 $1,411 _ $1,526 $1,593 J $1,631 Source: Puget Sound Economic Forecaster, June 2018 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 15 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 185 9.1.g Val bridge OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT MARKET AREA DATA PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Population Below is a summary of population growth for the following municipalities. Because of limited available land, the countywide growth rate has exceeded Edmonds and nearby municipalities this decade. Population Growth - Selected Jurisdictions f City •0 2000 Edmonds 30,743 39,544 39,709 41,820 % change N/A 28.6% 0.4% 5.3% Lynnwood 28,637 33,847 35,836 38,260 % change --- 18.2% 5.9% 6.8% Mountlake Terrace 19,320 20,362 19,909 21,560 % change N/A 5.4% -2.2% 8.3% Mukilteo 6,982 18,019 20,254 21,320 % change N/A 158.1% 12.4% 5.3% Woodway 914 936 1,307 1,340 % change --- 2.4% 39.6% 2.5% Shoreline (1) 53,296 53,007 55,730 % change --- --- -0.5% 5.1% Snohomish County 465,628 606,024 713,335 805,120 % change --- 30.2% 17.7% 12.9% (1) Incorporated in 1996 Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management, April 2018 Single Family Residential Market Below is a summary of sales activity from Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Over the past twelve months, the appreciation rate has slowed for single family residences; there are fewer sales and more active listings, and these are factors that point to a leveling off of pricing. Residential Sales Activity - Snohomish County .. �ng Median price $450,000 $484,995 7.8% Sold 1,203 955 -20.6% Pending 1,317 1,075 -18.4% Active listings 1,579 2,213 40.2% Months of inventory 1.3 2.3 76.5% Condominium. - Median price $296,000 $339.000 14.5% Sold 263 225 -14.4% Pending 297 232 -21.9% Active listings 271 355 31.0% Months of inventory 1 1.0 1,6 53.1% Source: Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 16 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 186 9.1.g k111� Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS ..,, Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT MARKET AREA DATA Apartment Market Conditions remain favorable for this market segment. There will be more inventory coming on line in 2019, which should meet ongoing demand. Below is a summary of mid-2018 trends in the five -county region, as charted by Kidder Mathews. Market Forecast Trends Market Snapshot Annual % Average Rer New Constriction 202018 3,037 102018 3,450 202017 2,982 1.84% Studio $1,323 Under Construction 27,729 28,327 25,567 8 46 % 1 Bedroom $1,448 Vacancy Rate 510111 5:50% 4,90% 4.08% 2 Bedroom $1,667 Avg Asking Renls $1,553 $1,521 $1,509 2,92 % 3 Bedroom $1,900 Avg Sales Pnce/Un1t $175,154 $7197,603 $201,036 -12,87 % Cap Rate 4.8406 4.66% 5.07% -4,54% Net Absorption 4,584 3,204 3,993 N/A Retail Real Estate Market According to a June 2018 retail study of the three -county region (King, Snohomish and Pierce counties) by Costar, the overall retail vacancy rate was 3.5%, slightly lower than the 3.6% rate one year earlier. In the Edmonds/Lynnwood submarket (see map below), Costar surveyed 660 properties totaling 10,989,866 SF. The June 2018 vacancy rate was 3.6%, with year-to-date absorption of 34,021 SF. There were no deliveries through mid-2018 but there was 43,600 SF under construction at mid -year; the average quoted rental rate was a modest $20.74/SF. Office Market The June 2018 vacancy rate was 7.0% in the Puget Sound area (King, Snohomish and Pierce counties), and has been on a gradual declining trend since 2011. In the Edmonds/Lynnwood submarket, Costar surveyed 337 properties totaling 5,019,176 SF. The June 2018 vacancy rate was 5.6%, and net absorption in the first six months of 2018 was minus 59,635 SF; there were no space delivered in the first half of 2018 and no space under construction at mid -year. Conditions are favorable despite the negative net absorption in the first half of the year. The average quoted rental rate was $27.11/SF. On the following page is a chart of Snohomish County market trends, courtesy of Kidder Mathews. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.dou h artha Lak L yonwood M ntfake T Traci• Costar Submarket Map (Retail, Office and Industrial) Page 17 T) a a Q Z x w c m E z U r Q Packet Pg. 187 9.1.g til Va I bridge ..,. PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT MARKET AREA DATA Industrial Market The June 2018 vacancy rate was 3.1% in the Puget Sound area (King, Snohomish and Pierce counties) and, like the office market, has been on a gradual declining trend since 2011. In the Edmonds/Lynnwood submarket, Costar surveyed 183 properties totaling 3,282,445 SF. The June 2018 vacancy rate was 0.5%, and year-to-date absorption was minus 555 SF. There were no deliveries in the first half of 2018 and no space under construction at mid -year. The average quoted rental rate was $0.845/SF per month. Compared to King and Pierce counties, Snohomish County has more manufacturing and less distribution space and The Boeing Company remains a primary driving force. Below is a summary chart of the Snohomish County submarket, prepared by Kidder Mathews. SNOHOMISH COUNTY SF 1.5M 1.2M 5.Gf°R. 5.W', SU,78 4.68°re 300K 2% OK 0% • K New Construction : Net Absorption O Vacancy —Average Rent (Median) Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 18 Packet Pg. 188 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Va I b ri dge MARKET AREA DATA 0\147PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Social Influences According to www.ciiy-data.com, median 2016 household income in Edmonds was $83,697, notably higher than the statewide median of $67,106. Environmental Influences No significant adverse environmental influences are noted. Summary The City of Edmonds is a medium-sized city of 41,820, situated along the Puget Sound shoreline. Because of its waterfront location and outstanding views, the city is an attractive place to live and work. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 19 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 189 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Va l bridge SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) . u. PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) General Location Mailing address is 18325 80' Avenue W and 7704 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington, 98026. It is on the west side of Olympic View Drive and east side of 80`h Avenue W in the City of Edmonds, just northwest of a small commercial area known as Perrinville. The view amenity is territorial at best. Olympic View Drive is a secondary two-lane arterial that extends northwesterly from 76th Avenue W toward Puget Sound, then turns south (paralleling the shoreline) and terminates at Puget Drive. 80th Avenue W is a lightly traveled north -south collector. Adjacent properties consist of single family residences to the north, south and west, and US Post Office to the east. The property is in U.S. Census Tract 503.00, and it is within the boundaries of the Edmonds School District which, according to www.schooldigger.com, ranks 73d out of 205 districts measured in Washington State. Land Area/Access Total land area of the irregularly shaped tract is 4.90 acres, according to county assessor's records, with 595.50 feet of frontage along Olympic View Drive and 115.0 feet along 80th Avenue W. Vehicular access is by both rights -of -way; in addition, there is a 20-foot wide right-of-way at the southerly boundary, extending southerly to 185th Place SW. The nearest freeway access is 3.4 miles to the southeast, where 1-5 intersects with 1961h Street SW. Topography/Drainage Topography is undulating, ranging from modest to steep, so development would require earth -moving along with soil removal and importation. An engineered stormwater detention system would be required for new construction. On the following page is an aerial photograph which shows elevation changes. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 20 18-0323 OlympicView.docx r Q Packet Pg. 190 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound ;1V' OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) .L S- Wetlands Additional expertise in scientific fields such as hydrology, geology, soil science and botany is necessary to interpret wetlands definitions and to accurately identify and delineate wetlands boundaries. According to the site plans, there are no sensitive areas on the tract. On the following page is site plan which shows the proposed subject parcels and right-of-way configuration. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx r Q Page 21 Packet Pg. 191 9.1.g ON Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Site Plan u 7 .. LOT 8015 SF y 11 1 J CL CJ1 r• F---__ LDT 5 LOT 1 -- a 1247- LOT 2 LOT 3 270 FF 1s<w SF. 21K OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) ---- J LOT F IF Lo C) 17 ICE .76;9- 0 LOT 7 u,r IF n u d� 6SEi5 CRYYFhT Fuauc -2.O 'A, i1,21a SF. n ?ENs114G FrA7-,-F-w+Y e LOT B 12.M IF ti A is LOT . _ ^z,Wr;F LOT 9 LOT 13 111V IF v �Ep L:%T 10 •x 121g1 xF 1us' 1 NAJ W " r` ua- 7�Y 1rV1 I LOT 12 LOT 11 17,042 SF IJ,�a sF Soil/Subsoil Conditions No evidence of unstable soil conditions was observed. Unstable soil or geologic conditions that are not obvious require separate investigation and are not considered in this appraisal report. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the property contains no hazardous materials or soil contamination. An independent investigation by qualified experts in the field is necessary to ascertain the presence of Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 22 Q Packet Pg. 192 9.1.g Vaibridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) asbestos and/or other hazardous materials. We reserve the right to adjust the market value estimate if definitive evidence is presented showing that there are hazardous materials on or within the property. Floodplains The site is above the 100-year floodplain, as shown on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map No. 53061C, Panel No. 1305E, dated November 8, 1999; therefore, no flood insurance is required for financing. Improvements The land is currently improved with a 2,918 SF residence built in 1976 and 1,974 SF residence built in 1959. The property owner intends to demolish the structures and develop a 14-lot single family residential plat, utilizing most of the unimproved Olympic Avenue right-of-way for a new street identified as 184th Place SW. Without the proposed right-of-way vacation, the owner can develop a 14-lot plat with average lot size of 13,208 SF, as shown on the preceding page and below. Land Area Summary # Size (SF) 1 12,016 2 12,004 3 12,703 4 12,732 5 19,358 6 13,131 7 14,170 8 12,045 9 12,888 10 12,184 11 13,949 12 12,042 13 13,282 14 12,407 Total 184,911 Average 13,208 Right-of-way 28,330 Tota 1 213,241 Acres 4.90 Utilities All utilities are available, with electricity by Snohomish County PUD No. 1, natural gas by Puget Sound Energy, garbage removal by Republics Services, and water and sanitary sewer services by the City of Edmonds. On the following page is a city utilities map, with water lines in blue, sanitary sewer lines in Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 23 Packet Pg. 193 9.1.g 011Valbridge ' PROPERTY An\"'-r1RC P OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) gold, and storm drainage lines in green (the green squares are catch basins the green circles are manholes). 187)6 18727 S•t5-� _.�,��+ 5 i6CE VL PD5-85.16Cf f 8337 6 18:3(15 1fj 1831.1 ° k 18376 a .r • J� l4 s- 8001 s) 18315 18408 5.204 5 10J � Sewer U< t, �ns4 s At 0 9 2Cg 5.QW ° ° a 18415 ° 18-118 n 7601 18419 I � 18426 159: 5 135A f•1598 S 18437 1850i Easements or Other Use Restrictions A title report was not available. Based on review of other available documentation, there are no easements or encumbrances which would adversely influence market value. Assessed Value and Taxes Real property in Snohomish County is assessed at market value by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office. Assessed values are updated annually and property taxes are based on levy rates, which are determined through the budgeting process of the county and various local districts on an annual basis. The 2018 levy rate is 1.066% of assessed value. On the following page is a summary of the subject property's 2018 assessed value and property tax burden. The taxes include surcharges for soil conservation, ranging from $5.93 to $6.06 per parcel. For tax year 2019, total assessed value increased by 6.5% to $2,059,600, and all but $84,200 of which is allocated to land. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Page 24 Packet Pg. 194 9.1.g k1\11Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Assessed Value and Real Estate Tax Summary Tax Account Land Building Real Estate Number Area (SF) Area (SF) Land Per SF Improved Per SF Total Taxes 003708-001-009-00 43,996 2,918. $410,200 $9.32 A75,300 $2581 $485,500 15,179.51 003708-001-010-00 27,878 0 $302,800 $10.86 $0 $0.00 $302,800 $3,232.54 003708-001-011-00 33,106 1,974 $350,800 $10.60 $0 $0.00 $350,800 $4,413.23 004346-000-106-01 99,317 0 $795,000 $8.00 $0 $0.00 $795,000 $8,747.48 Totals 204,296 4,892 $1,858,800 " $9.10 $75,300 '$15.39 $1,934,100 $21,572.76 Land and building areas are based on county assessor's records. /-%Nbe55U1 5 Ivl d r i r7 7294 �.. ;4 b 1043 13 LZI 8 irf,raf r I � 9 -o I. 12 i f1042 II I 9 030 11 10 m - -- - --- ----- ------ -- - -- - •- ----- - - - - - - - - - - - j P j 0 .r( 1 2 10 �,, ;, i 04 05 1 13 a , 9 106 8 M 7 6 61 01 5 r: 16 i 17 i 18 19 20 21 '� r 4 3 �� 185Tw--PL Sw 22 ,. W 26 25 24 23 02 01 -1 •L r� X w U a Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 25 Packet Pg. 195 9.1.g ON Valhridge ;;:•:;!/ PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Land Use Regulations Zoning is RS-12, a Residential Single-family designation by the city which primarily allows detached single family residences on lots no smaller than 12,000 SF. Other primary permitted uses include churches and various public uses. Below is a chart of development standards, as excerpted from the Edmonds municipal code; and on the following page is a portion of the November 2017 zoning map, which shows all or most of the site under a contract rezone. The previous proposed Angler's Crossing plat expired in January 2017, according to city council minutes. 16.20.030 Table of site development standards. ® SHARE Sub Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Minimum District Lot Area DensityLot Width Height Street Side Rear Coverage Parking (Sq.Ft.) Setback Setback Setback (%) Spaces2 RS-20 20.000 22 100, 25' 35-3 & 10' 25' 25' 35% 2 RS-12 12.000 37 80, 25' 10, 25' 25' 35% 2 RSW- 12,000 37 — 15, 10, 35' 25' 35% 2 124 RS-10 10.000 44 75' 25' 10, 20' 25' 35% 2 RS-8 8,000 5.5 70' 25' 7-112' 15' 25' 35% 2 RS-6 6,000 7-3 60' 20' 5' 15' 25' 35% 2 RS-MP5 12,0001 3.75 80'5 25'S 10'S 25.5 25' 35% 2 t'Density means 'dwelling units per acre" determined by dividing the total lot area by the density allowed by the underlying zoning, the number of lots or units permitted shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number- 2 See Chapter # 7.50 ECDC for specific parking requirements. 3 Thirty-five feet total of both sides. 10 feet minimum on either side- 4 Lots must have frontage on the ordinary high water irne and a public slreel or access easemenl approved by the hearing examiner 5 "MP' signifies 'master plan' The standards in this section show the standards applicable to development without an approved master plan. Properties in this zone may be developed at a higher urban density lot pattern equivalent to RS-8 but this shall only be permitted in accordance with a duly adopted master plan adopted under the provisions of ECDC 16"2044§. ford.47 11 1 20051 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 26 r Q Packet Pg. 196 9.1.g Va I bridge �►'?iW. PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Page 27 a Packet Pg. 197 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT 0\1 VaIbridge HIGHEST AND BEST USE (BEFORE ACQUISITION) :'r"' PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound HIGHEST AND BEST USE (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Highest and best use is the most fundamental premise upon which estimations of market value are based. According to "The Appraisal of Real Estate" (Fourteenth Edition, 2013), highest and best use is defined as: "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property that is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity. Alternatively, the probable use of land or improved property — specific with respect to the user and timing of the use —that is adequately supported and results in the highest present value." Highest and best use analysis is a highly relevant consideration in the appraisal process. This analysis forms the basis upon which property is appraised, whether it is vacant land or land plus existing improvements. To this end, it is necessary to do two tests: (1) Highest and best use of land as though vacant and (2) Highest and best use of the property as improved. The primary reason for estimating the highest and best use of land as though vacant is to estimate land value. If there is an existing improvement on the site, the land is viewed as though vacant. A conclusion is then reached as to what use creates the highest residual to the land or the highest land value. It is then possible to identify comparable sales of vacant land. Legally Permissible Zoning is RS-12, a Residential Single-family designation by the city which primarily allows detached N single family residences on lots no smaller than 12,000 SF. L a Q. Numerous factors are considered by county agencies including sensitive areas, access from public a streets, utility availability, drainage, and other physical effects to the surrounding uses. Most of these factors are site -specific, thus interpretation of the code and its application to the subject is not entirely predictable until actual studies are completed. x w Physically Possible The site has undulating topography, ranging from modestly to steep, which adds to development z challenges, with no apparent wetlands or other sensitive areas. Soils appear to have sufficient load- U bearing capacity and all utilities are available. In summary, the tract can legally and physically Q accommodate a 14-lot plat. Financially Feasible/Maximally Productive The subject 4.90-acre tract is well -located in an established residential neighborhood. Market conditions remain robust but there are indications of softening. From July 2017 to July 2018, the median price of single family residences in Snohomish County increased 7.8% but there are fewer Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 28 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 198 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Va I bridge HIGHEST AND BEST USE (BEFORE ACQUISITION) PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound sales and more available inventory compared to last year, so it is anticipated that price appreciation will continue to dampen over the next twelve months. For new construction (built in 2016 and newer) in Edmonds, on lots in the 6,000 SF to 20,000 SF range, there were 26 sales in the twelve months ending September 2018 and the median price was $1,075,000, with an average exposure period of 23 days and average living area of 3,253 SF. As noted in the Market Area analysis, regional economic indicators show a slight decline in average home prices and number of sales, which makes it important for there to be an appropriate number of new homes in categories where there is greatest demand. Below is a summary of homes and exposure periods by price category in the Edmonds area. Sold Listings in Edmonds (Lots Smaller Than 20,000 SF) 9 Months Ending 9/30/2017 9 Months Ending 9/30/2018 Range Number of AveragePrice Cumulative Numberof Average Cumulative Days Sales Days on Market Sales on Market $300,000 - $349,999 5 12 4 12 $350,000 - $399,999 28 19 9 17 $400,000 - $449,999 56 20 42 9 $450,000 - $499,999 63 26 60 15 $500,000 - $549,999 52 18 64 13 $550,000 - $599,999 65 20 58 23 $600,000 - $649,999 56 20 55 20 $650,000 - $699,999 39 23 50 14 $700,000 - $749,999 30 30 35 16 $750,000 - $799,999 25 21 28 23 $800,000 - $849,999 10 30 17 25 $850,000 - $899,999 8 10 17 27 $900,000 - $949,999 13 17 9 32 $950,000 - $999,999 11 44 14 17 $1,000,000 - $1,049,999 4 15 7 12 $1,050,000 - $1,099,999 3 7 13 12 $1,100,000 - $1,149,999 7 122 7 12 $1,150,000 - $1,199,999 4 95 6 6 Source: Northwest Multiple Listing Service. The above data points to an active market in the $400,000 to $800,000 price range, recognizing the number of transactions. Although there have been fewer sales in the $800,000 to $1,200,000 range, exposure times were less than one month in all but one category. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 29 18-0323 OlympicView.docx r Q Packet Pg. 199 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT errsVa I bridge HIGHEST AND BEST USE (BEFORE ACQUISITION) PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Financially feasible options are examined, including market analysis of various property types in light of the subject site's location and physical characteristics. Considering the state of the market, along with all other relevant factors, highest and best use is for development of a 14-lot subdivision. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 30 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 200 9.1.g Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS r... R Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Approaches Used in the Valuation Process — The valuation estimates are obtained by the proper use of three different approaches to value, the Cost, Income and Sales Comparison approaches. These three approaches are different in character but related somewhat in the known facts they require to arrive at an opinion of value from each. The final conclusion of value is derived through a correlation process in which the appraiser weighs one approach against the other to determine the relative merits of each before coming to a conclusion. The Cost Approach to Value is the process of first determining the value of the subject land, to which is added the replacement cost new of the structure, less depreciation, and the cost of land improvements. The sum of the costs is the indication of value by the Cost Approach. The Income Approach to Value involves the estimation of a gross economic rental, which is then processed by subtracting an estimated vacancy and credit loss and operating expenses to obtain an estimated net operating income. The net operating income is then capitalized into a value conclusion by the appropriate capitalization rate derived from the market. The Sales Comparison Approach to Value is utilized in several different methods. Sales of comparable buildings and land are analyzed to determine a sale price per square foot or other market - accepted denominator. An alternative method deals with a gross income multiplier, which is an expression of the relationship between the gross income and value. Final Correlation and Conclusion of Value — The various indications of value from the approaches are analyzed as to how they relate to one another, as well as to the market. The approach or approaches most appropriate are given the most consideration in arriving at a final opinion of value. The property is non -income producing, so the Income Approach is not utilized. Because it is vacant land, the Cost Approach is not applicable, although elements of the Cost Approach are utilized in the land residual (or subdivision) analysis. Consequently, the primary valuation method is the Sales Comparison Approach. Under this valuation technique, market value is estimated using two valuation methods: (1) a subdivision (or land residual) analysis, and (2) comparable sales analysis of similar undeveloped residential acreage. Land Valuation The subject property is valued by comparing recent sales of residential land possessing similar characteristics. Adjustments are made to the unit sale price to compensate for differences such as zoning, physical characteristics, size, location and other relevant attributes. When the sale is inferior to the subject, an upward adjustment is made. Alternatively, when the sale is superior to the subject, a downward adjustment is made. These adjusted values are correlated to a single unit value that is then applied to the subject. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 31 Packet Pg. 201 9.1.g Valbrldge PROPERTY ADVISORS SORS .a,..+ A Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Subdivision Analysis This procedure begins by considering the probable selling price of the individual finished lots based on review of market sales data. Next, deductions are made for closing costs and commissions. Remaining development costs (if applicable) are deducted, as are holding costs such as real estate taxes. Finally, an allocation is made for an appropriate retail profit margin for the developer. Because lot sellout is anticipated to occur shortly after recording, recognizing current market conditions, a static residual analysis is utilized. GROSS SELLOUT VALUE Sales of similarly zoned land are investigated and compared to the subject property, and the search included transactions in the market area that have sold in 2018. The subject lots are viewed with all mitigation fees and utility assessments paid by the seller and all comparable sales are adjusted to reflect the same conditions. On the following page is a summary tabulation of the land sales used in the valuation process, followed by a comparable land sale map, photographs and plat maps of the comparables, analysis and conclusion. Comparable Lot Sales Tabulation Average Analysis Lot Size Price Per Sale No. Location Sale Date Subj. 7704 Olympic View N/A Zoning RS-12, Residential Price (SF) DUs DU Comments N/A 13,208 14 N/A .Average lot size is before Drive, Edmonds Single-family proposed right-of-way vacation. (12,000 SF minimum lot size) 1 5326 160th Street SW, 10/5/2018 R-9600, Residential $280,000 12,700 1 $280,000 Previously improved with a 2,593 SF Edmonds (maximum 4.5 residence built in 1978 and DUs/acre) demolished in 2017. The seller previously acquired the property in July 2018 via Trustee's Deed. Listed for $289,950 and 8 days on market. The buyer intends to construct a 2,642 SF residence with attached 732 SF garage. 2 914 Sea Vista Place, 8/24/2018 RS-10, Residential $300,000 11,031 1 $300,000 Sold for the asking price after 9 ,Edmonds Single-family days on the market. Sloping (10,000 SF topography, partial to good sound minimum lot size) and mountain views. 3 .3124 176th Street SW, 7/3/2018 RS-8, Residential $255,000 15,199 1 $255,000 Listed for $265,000 and 13 days on Lynnwood Single-family market, estate sale. Dilapidated (8,400 SF base mobile home on the property. 3/9/2018 minimum lot size) RS-20, Residential ^12,064 1 4 17123 69th Place W, $248,000 $248,000 Listed for $269,000 and 249 days -Edmonds Single-family on market. Vacant, sloping site with (20,000 SF filtered mountain views. minimum lot size) 5 19816 and 19824 86th 2/16/2018 RS-8, Residential $670,000 8,003 2 $335,000 Listed for $699,950 and 4 days on Place W, Edmonds Single-family market. The lots were created in (8,000 SF minimum October 2017 lot size) Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 32 18-0323 OlympicView.docx M N M L C. a r� Z t K W C d E t t� C r a Packet Pg. 202 9.1.g 01 1 Va 1 bridge :1., PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE LOT SALES MAP OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) C"IC Point -North 99 Lynnwood , Meadowdele Beach Perk szs F Sculhwesl County Pork w E sublt" a ss PERRINVILI E 4 i k E Lynnwood C.wens v $ Edmonds Community d colfte u Edmonds M.. Si 20M St 3W 46 $� 21Im S1 SW 'i1Ctt i1. i''- W H � 9 100 nft St SW i20th 11 SW Woodway g Esperence t Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Page 33 Packet Pg. 203 9.1.g Valbridge ;p¢ PROPERTY ADVISOR` Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Comparable Land Sale No. 1 5326 160th Street SW, near Lynnwood Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 34 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 204 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) • SET /Ro.V P/N W/Tf! PL457/C CAP!/00 9&qf .. ,•«C _z � _ •• • o - FOUND EX I,5TIA16 RiBAR 95 NOTEDF7� =. "1 2 S-28-85 i Ld U I (.ve6'sa'GS"w 29G.40 J .- 1 •1 Q J t. ��. .vsa!Ts' -w zo�.g7• .iaYrApkRdp . 'LAP,�gD 9dTf'' ••li 7 largo 1�d4.1Kb/tA�r'$3•+�e - WW Y .,. _ `v• i � LLJ 'v �+2 1/,O91dR, W Y ib i I/.3ZO 41 i w OD �. 'l97. Jd4.D0• 1 Qi L! RE9Aft S[ET3y� �r6�•rf3 x.s- 29¢..eg• R LIP .H14 LETC+VY.AdSCC.`-.' rU66 '37"W 296.W � ._ Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 35 a Packet Pg. 205 9.1.g 011 � Va I bridge ;;;; PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE LOT SALE IMAGES Comparable Land Sale No. 3 3124 176" Street SW, Lynnwood Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Page 36 Q Packet Pg. 206 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Vafbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Comparable Land Sale No. 4 17123 691h Place W, Edmonds Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 37 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 207 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Comparable Land Sale No. 5 19816 and 19824 861h Place W, Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Page 38 Q Packet Pg. 208 9.1.g kill Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound LOT SALE ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Since no two properties are identical, it is necessary to compare all reasonable differences between the properties which sold and the subject property. When appropriate data is available, a paired sales analysis is attempted to determine the various elements to which property values are sensitive. If available data is insufficient to make quantitative adjustments; qualitative discussion is used when relating sales to the subject property and quantitative adjustments are made based on the appraisers' judgment. Adjustments are made, if necessary, to the comparable sale prices to make them comparable to the subject as of the effective date of the value estimate. The elements of comparison include property rights conveyed, financing, sale conditions, market conditions, location, view, access, size, zoning, physical characteristics and other relevant factors, and the adjustment grid on the following page reflects the direction and degree of adjustments. Although the most dated, most emphasis is placed on Sale No. 5 due to proximity and similar location, and secondary weighting is given to the remaining transactions. Considering the above, the average market value of finished lots at the subject property is estimated at $325,000 apiece. In addition to comparable lot transactions, a residual analysis is utilized to test the reasonableness of the value conclusion. The median price of new construction in Edmonds is $1,075,000 but, considering the prices of homes in the range of highest demand, the price of a completed residence is estimated at $800,000. Utilizing closing costs of 5%, cost data from Marshall Valuation Service (a national cost - reporting authority) and contractor's profit at 10%, residual per lot value is summarized below. Value of finished single family residence I $800,000 Less: Sales and marketing expenses @ 5.0% of gross sale price 40000 Net sale proceeds $760,000 Less: Contractor's profit @ 10.0% of gross sale price r ($76,000) Less: Construction costs $684,000 Residence: 3,253 SF @ $95.00 per SF ($309,035) Garage: 750 SF @ $25.00 per SF ($18,750) Landscaping, other ($40,000) Indicated lot residual value $316,215 (R) $316,000 Recognizing the above, market value of finished single family lots on the subject tract is reasonably concluded at $325,000 apiece. Gross sellout value summarized below. Gross Sellout Value 14 finished lots @ $325,000 per lot..............................................................................$4,550,000 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 39 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 209 9.1.g Va 1 bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Comparable Lot Sales Adjustment Grid Property/Location 7704 Olympic View 5326 160th Street 914 Sea Vista Place, 3124 176th Street 17123 69th Place W, 19816 and 19824 Drive, Edmonds SW, Edmonds Edmonds SW, Lynnwood Edmonds 86th Place W, Edmonds .Asking price N/A $289,950 $300,000 $265,000 $269,000 $699,950 Days on market N/A 8 9 13 249 4 Sale date N/A 10/5/2018 8/24/2018 7/3/2018 3/9/2018 2/16/2018 Sale price N/A $280,000 $300,000 $255,000 $248,000 $670,000 Lots 14 1 1 1 1 2 Price/lot N/A $280,000 $300,000 $255,000 $248,000 $335,000 Auditor's File No. N/A 20181005-0054 20180824-0523 20180703-0466 20180309-0213 20180216-0657 Tax parcel number 004346-000-106-01; 005137-000-037-06 270325-001-150-00 005038-000-048-00 010173-000-011-00 270419-002-145-00, 003708-001-009-00, 146-00 010-00,-011-00 Rights conveyed N/A Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Adjustment Financing N/A Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Adjustment Sale conditions N/A Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Adjustment Market conditions N/A Small upward Small upward Upward Upward Average lot size (SF) 13,208 12,700 11,031 15,199 12,064 8,003 Adjustment Small upward Small downward Upward Mitigation fees Assumed paid Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Adjustment Physical attributes Finished lots, level to Level Sloping Similar Sloping Level modest slope Adjustment Small downward Small upward Small downward Small upward Small downward Access Adequate Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Adjustment Location Good Inferior Superior, Edmonds Inferior Inferior Similar "bowl.. Adjustment Upward Downward Upward Smaller upward View Territorial Similar Superior Similar Slightly superior Similar Adjustment I I I Downward Small downward Utilities All available Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Adjustment Overall adjustment I N/A I Smaller upward I Smaller downward Upward Upward Smaller u ward BULK SALE DISCOUNTING A factor that inhibits additional analysis is that, because of changes in the financing environment since 2008, developers are predominantly "going vertical", meaning that they will purchase land in "raw" condition or with entitlements, develop the infrastructure, then construct and sell the finished residences. Less common are developers completing infrastructure and then selling finished lots to homebuilders, although there is a slow return to this business model. Considering this, it is anticipated that the subject lots will fully sell out within a year of infrastructure completion, either in in one transaction or multi -part takedown, without bulk sale discount. Since the sellout period is no longer than twelve months, no discounted cash flow analysis is deemed necessary. In our experience, developers in the Puget Sound region typically do not use discounted cash flow analyses for properties where development and lot sellout occur within a twelve-month period. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 40 Packet Pg. 210 9.1.g �111/ Valbridge R;? PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) CLOSING COSTS Typical sales commission rates for land are 5% to 7%, and other closing costs are typically 2%. To ensure that lots are sold in a timely fashion in the current economic and real estate climate, a 3% commission is estimated (recognizing that marketing may occur in-house) and another 2% is added to reflect closing costs such as excise tax, title report, etc., for a total of 5.0%. DEVELOPMENT COSTS Based on experience with dozens of plats in the metropolitan area, total development costs are estimated at $75,000 to $100,000 per lot. Considering the topography of the subject property, total development costs are estimated at the high end of the range, or $100,000 per potential lot. ENTREPRENEURIAL INCENTIVE Return to the developer for undertaking the effort and risk to acquire land, complete the development process and market finished lots varies widely. Historically, developers have sought to achieve returns ranging from 10% to 25% for raw land development. In the case of the subject property, it is nearing final plat approval, so entrepreneurial incentive is estimated at 15% of gross sellout value, which also incorporates holding costs. SUBDIVISION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION Considering the above variables, residual land value estimated as shown below. Residual Analysis "As Is" Total Per Lot Amount Number of potential lots: 14 Gross sellout value (GSV) @ $325,000 per lot $325,000 $4,550,000 Less: Sales and marketing expenses @ 5.0% of GSV 1 25 227 500 Net sale proceeds $308,750 $4,322,500 Less: Total estimated development costs @ $100,000 per lot ($100,000) ($1,400,000) Less: Entrepreneurial incentive @ 15.0% of GSV 48 750 682 500 $160,000 Indicated "as is" land residual value $2,240,000 (R) $160,000 $2,240,000 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 41 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Mn a Q. Q t x w c m E t U a r r Q Packet Pg. 211 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Va I b r i d g a PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Unimproved Acreage Analysis A search for similar acreage sales was made, and below is a tabulation of the comparables, followed by a map, photographs and analysis. Comparable Residential Acreage Transactions Sale No Location Sale Date Zoning Analysis Price $1,100,000 Land Area (Acres) 4.90 Average Lot Size (SIF) 13,208 DUs 14 DUs Per Gross Acre 29 Price Per DU $78,571 1Purchased Comments from the US Subj. '7704 Olympic View 12/23/2016 RS,12000, -Drive, Edmonds Residential Single- I Bankruptcy Court. Listed for family (12,000 SF $1.7 million and almost 36 minimum lot size) months on market. Sloping topography in significant _ portions of site 6 Hull 4-lot short plat, 6/14/2018 R-9600, Residential $650,000 0.96 10,446 4 4.2 $162,500 Originally listed for $800,000, 1625 180th Place SW, (maximum 4.5 then reduced to $650,000, on near Lynnwood DUs/acre) the market for 51 days, Improved with a 2,460 SF tri- level residence built in 1991. The buyer intends to develop a 4-lot short plat. 7 2588 Vine Road, Brier 1/31/2018 RS-12500, $2,500,000 4A6 13,667 13 2.6 $192,308 Negotiated directly between Residential Single- buyer and seller. Previously family (12,500 SF improved with 12 single family minimum lot size) residences utilized for military housing, with installed street infrastructure and utilities. The residences were demolished prior to sale. The buyer intends to keep the street and utility infrastructure, and develop a 13 lot subdivision, 8 22509 52nd Avenue W, 10/31/2017 RS-7200, $565,000 0.65 7,348 3 4.6 $188,333 (Listed for $670,000 and 13 days Mountlake Terrace Residential Single- on market, "fully approved family (7,200 SF short plat" at time of sale. base minimum lot (Previously sold in May 2016 for size) :$302,317 or $100,772 per 9/1/2017 7 4.7 Ihomesite in "raw" condition. (Negotiated directly between 9 Gustayson short plat, RS-8, Residential $1,000,000 148 8,412 $142,857 17420 32nd Avenue W, Single-family (buyer and seller. Improved with Lynnwood (8,400 SF base a 576 SF residence built in 1954 minimum lot size) .and 1,161 SF residence built in 1961, demolished subsequent sale. Purchased without .entitlements, the buyer is developing a 7-lot short plat. 10 (Leawood Heights, 1/6/2017 RS-8, Residential $1,720,000 4.35 8,491 16 3.7 $107,500 .Assembled from two sellers, '19100 block of 36th Single-family negotiated directly, in "raw" Avenue W, Lynnwood (8,400 SF base condition at time of sale. The minimum lot size) buyer subsequently developed a 16-lot residential subdivision. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 42 18-0323 OlympicView.docx M A M L Q. Q ti t K W j.i C d E t C) M 4+ a Packet Pg. 212 9.1.g ON Valbridge '`' !/ PROPERTY ADVISORS ...,,. Puget Sound COMPARABLE ACREAGE SALES MAP OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) C C 0 1761h St SV'd 1761h St Sw 1b p�m ° 525 -' 2 �JS cam[ � ta• � c .�� :�� �a a c fi.f 1I ur R 6Ciln .�iE..'/ll ,,,... „ l ° 18A1h St SW +Q m i:. � 401 i' ;? j8 iih $I w7 gf a i ri.F'A.rk ry[ S -I yPerrrnvale II 1� n h LYnr r: c, �l 1 3 1881111 St SW 1881h St SW L,yrmndalc Hai k '7 JL T V .j, - i A!7 i� L woad'M2 192ntl St l W Dr 41 iicrihrr Rlder"ad pa 1 dF n �194[h St Sn Mansrr:. ° a , l 1�� atr,ber .t1 si n o �fh ' St 5VV:1 '_" -524 r.,11i•: {9.P31 k "I' - — A II a Lake fixer k �La1 e F ark ��� - •-, LYMvrnor! 2a(3Rh Si SW . _ na 2oUt h Si 5Vd m @k IgHtnra ! dtk i Edmonds { ii II °� ' {: Vauey 204th St Sw —II +� 204th St -St�! Pine RWIGA Park: _.. Main y 'r5 [,; seaft 2061h } a ty st Park ��� /�r�`�s IL 1 :li 11 I' r • �i WAY ]liL 3LiLJ� LI I 21,23tf`` Sr•) Sw , 2T4eh St BRVS. N y� z2ath st svv 22[7t1, st.:SY_-•:I',nrk VSf2:r! fIJ 8 W[l . 222nd 'St SW �22Ath St 5VV I : 7aL4' U, :m Mountlake Trace r- Ter ce Brieras 228th St SVV. ;,...• §�[ creek Park 22atit St SVSi'• °f # ;"'c, CM0 B[� Park Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 43 Packet Pg. 213 9.1.g Valbridge sst PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE ACREAGE SALE IMAGES Comparable Land Sale No. 6 Hull 4-lot short plat, 1625 180th Street SW, near Lynnwood OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) io to air rip = AL -_ 42 73• G Fti7`t FZ d R�� ' - 30�xGo cpr�k- .rc r N VF- Ilk g �'•-+[� . �_.. � � � ��'� � ir •r , Z% r� FOB ., d5.sirrf�lar.r.. rtw.Yr� Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 44 Q Packet Pg. 214 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE ACREAGE SALE IMAGES Comparable Land Sale No. 7 2588 Vine Road, Brier Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Page 45 Q Packet Pg. 215 9.1.g �1 Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE ACREAGE SALE IMAGES Comparable Land Sale No. 8 22509 52"d Avenue W, Mountlake Terrace OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) 1. `` d7dlH-�F6 M 1 c� t L 11t11 vAll} IR aMwtl •' 1• � i R I ]RAGA 1 µxal®onrcvar•unllin 1 A.Itr - - yf• � t � wa ( 19 �1 1 i� •� _ i 1 i r •' nl i r�•• r tAil LQf24-4 1 I{ RWvITi Tk�• JII •l `Y����t+i I � I � } I 111111GLARPA P I r , ��� 1SIpaR�i .wrnw ral A�NY.IWY[w tl ptI1A50rs _ "-- IU Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Page 46 Packet Pg. 216 9.1.g Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound Comparable Land Sale No. 9 Gustayson 7-lot short plat, 17420 32nd Avenue W, Lynnwood Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Page 47 Q Packet Pg. 217 ,�1� Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound COMPARABLE ACREAGE SALE IMAGES Comparable Land Sale No. 10 Leawood Heights, 19022 36th Avenue W, Lynnwood OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) u -.- �--'r N r, v 9 9 1 0 PARA RE" . . ............. A V 0A*9 o 9 2 it r pi aT-1 1. LE4 WOOD HEIGHTS VCVM 33 AU fAt ow tK istu iA n$W27ft ROE opyarLMMOW 2 T' 4W -7 Molar IV,* 10 9 7 10 r ------ lj� 01 17 MAU M —.40. —77 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicViewdocx Page 48 1 Packet Pg. 218 9.1.g %Y111 Vaibridge ... PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound ACREAGE SALE ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Below site is an adjustment grid illustrating the analytical process. The unadjusted range in per lot prices, not including the subject December 2016 sale, is $107,500 to $197,308 per potential lot and the average is $158,700 per homesite. Sale Nos. 2 and 3 are appropriately at the high end of the range, Sale No. 2 because the property already had improved street and utility infrastructure and Sale No. 3 because it was construction -ready at time of sale. Sale Nos. 4 and 5 are older transactions and in "rawer" condition when they sold, so they are given secondary consideration. Least is consideration is accorded the subject purchase due to underlying sale conditions. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 49 Q Packet Pg. 219 9.1.g �I. Va I bridge ?{{4;ti PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) Com arable Land Sales Adjustment Grid Property/Location 7704 Olympic View Hull 4-lot short plat, 2588 Vine Road, 22509 52nd Avenue Gustayson short Leawood Heights, Drive, Edmonds 1625 180th Place Brier W, Mountlake plat, 17420 32nd 19100 block of 36th SW, near Lynnwood Terrace Avenue W, Avenue W, Lynnwood Lynnwood Asking price $1,700,000 $650,000 N/A $670,000 N/A N/A Days on market 147 51 N/A 13 N/A N/A Sale date 12/23/2016 6/14/2018 1/31/2018 10/31/2017 9/1/2017 1/6/2017 Sale price $1,100,000 $650,000 $2,500,000 $565,000 $1,000,000 $1,720,000 Lots 14 4 13 3 7 16 Price/lot $78,571 $162,500 $192,308 $188,333 $142,857 $107,500 Auditor's File No. 20161223-0533 20171215-0475 20180131-0324 20171031-0734 20170901-0556 20170106-0471,- 0487 Tax parcel number 004346-000-106-01; 270325-001-055-00 003731-019-001-01, 004550-001-012-00 005038-000-014-00, 003726-004-003-01, 003708-001-009-00, 03 030-00,-031-00 02 010-00,-011-00 Rights conveyed N/A Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Adjustment Financing N/A Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Cash equivalent Adjustment Sale conditions Bought out of Arm's length Negotiated directly Arm's length Negotiated directly Negotiated directly bankruptcy court Adjustment Market conditions Larger upward Small upward Smaller upward Upward Upward Larger upward $ adjustment $10,300 $4,000 $9,800 $13,000 $11,600 $13.700 Project size 14 4 13 3 7 16 Adjustment Downward I Downward Smaller downward Average lot size (SF) 13,208 10,446 13,667 7,348 8,412 8,491 Adjustment Upward Upward Upward Upward Physical attributes Topography issues Level, road Superior Somewhat superior Somewhat superior Similar extension necessary Adjustment Offsetting Downward Smaller downward Smaller downward Access Adequate Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Adjustment Location Good Inferior Somewhat inferior Similar Inferior Inferior Adjustment Upward Small upward Upward Upward 'View Territorial Similar Similar Similar Superior, partial Superior, partial mountain mountain Adjustment I Downward Downward (Utilities All available All available All available All available All available All available Adjustment Other "Raw" condition at "Raw" condition at Road and utility "Fully approved "Raw" condition at "Raw" condition at time of sale time of sale infrastructure short plat" time of sale time of sale completed Adjustment I Upward I Upward Lar a downward 1 Smaller downward U ward Upward Overall adjustment a Lar upward Larger upward Larger downward Smaller downward Upward Large upward Considering the location, physical characteristics, development status and other relevant factors, market value by this technique is estimated at $160,000 per potential homesite or $2,240,000. Reconciliation and Final estimate of value The two approaches used to value the subject property resulted in the following value indications: Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlynnpicView.docx Page 50 Q Packet Pg. 220 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT �I Va I br i dg a PROPERTY VALUATION (BEFORE ACQUISITION) PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound SubdivisionAnalysis............................................................................................................$2,240,000 Sales Comparison Approach............................................................................................$2,240,000 Considering the quantity and quality of comparable data, most emphasis is placed on the residual or subdivision emphasis. As such, it is our opinion that market value of the subject property, as of October 16, 2018, is: TWO MILLION TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,240,000) Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 51 18-0323 OlympicView.docx a Packet Pg. 221 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT 011 Va(briPROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound SITE DATA (AFTER ACQUISITION) Description of Property Rights to be Acquired As proposed, the easterly 2,230 SF of unimproved right-of-way is vacated, with the north half encumbered by a 10-foot wide pedestrian access easement, as shown in the map below. Site Plan (After Acquisition) F — — R f LOT 5 !y -- W LOT G oG LOT 4 tvv cr O ixra. sr 3: - J _ • .. - is me a'saip+r�— — '• 0.. f — umrr euoo+r — k LOT 1 s LOT 2 "� OTT 120ie Sr. Ita?aIr. 3 s3 I O LOT 7 I p a �] MM Sr. U PEWS1mw y se9srs+`wa�L"R.O.W.---='°r �r• — PAPv. LOT 8 y Ity of ara sr ti LOT 14 "• L� e;wr xr r LOT 9 •p� 110H 1R ±sir +wr LOT 43 eixa IF. LOT IC K a,ae+ sr TRACT 991 J CL ; spas aF - - �; r LOT 12 LOT II y Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx r Q Page 52 Packet Pg. 222 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT SITE DATA (AFTER ACQUISITION) Effects of Acquisition Land area is greater by 2,230 SF (a 1.0% increase of total land area), enabling the owner to increase average lot size by 175 SF, to 13,383 SF per homesite. The greater land area allows improved development flexibility and potential cost savings. Below is a land area summary. Land Area Summary # Size (SF) 1 12,016 2 12,004 3 12,703 4 12,732 5 19,358 6 13,131 7 15,365 8 12,192 9 13,077 10 12,387 11 14,641 12 12,042 13 13,311 14 12,407 Total 187,366 Average 13,383 Right-of-way 28,105 Total 215,471 Acres 4.95 Site Data (Description of Remainder) The site plan on the preceding page shows lot configuration after acquisition of unimproved right-of- way. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 53 Packet Pg. 223 9.1.g OLYMPIC VIEw DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT 1 Va l bridge HIGHEST & BEST USE AND PROPERTY VALUATION PROPERTY ADVISORS (AFTER ACQUISITION) Puget Sound HIGHEST AND BEST USE (AFTER ACQUISITION) Recognizing the size of the site relative to the acquisition area, and considering the configuration after acquisition, highest and best use is essentially unchanged. PROPERTY VALUATION (AFTER ACQUISITION) A similar analytical approach was applied in the "after" situation as in the "before" situation, the difference being slightly larger average lot size and improved development flexibility. The difference is quantified in the "after" situation at $160,500 per lot or $2,247,000. In a residual analysis, this would translate to a $600 to $700 difference in average lot value from the "before" situation, or $600 to $700 per lot savings in development costs, or some combination. A 175 SF difference in average lot size can be substantive in small -lot subdivisions such as planned residential developments (PRDs), where an increase of 175 SF to a 3,500 SF lot can enlarge a building footprint enough to affect underlying lot value. However, for a 13,200± SF lot, an increase in lot size of less than 200 SF does not measurably change intensity of use and, hence, does not significantly influence lot value. Damages There are no measurable damages to the property remainder. Special Benefits No special benefits are specified due to the acquisitions. a Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 54 Packet Pg. 224 9.1.g VaEbridge OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT 011 RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE In developing valuation estimates as indicated by the approaches used in this report, the appraisers utilized all pertinent market data available. Using appraisal techniques best suited to the data presented and placing greater weight on the most reliable data (i.e., that which has greatest similarity to the subject property), the probable market value range of the subject property is resolved into conclusions of most probable market value. Based on the investigation and analysis of all the elements which reasonably affect value, we have formed the opinion that market value of the subject property, as of October 16, 2018, is: Market Value Before Acquisition....................................................................................$2,240,000 Market Value After Acquisition.......................................................................................$2,247,000 MarketValue Difference.............................................................................................................$7,000 Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 55 Packet Pg. 225 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE Summary of Conclusions (Accounting tabulation - NOT indicative of appraisal method employed) Indicated Subject Value Before Project Highest and Best Use Before: 14-lot residential subdivision cr Vyh. rrer^,rs! 213,241 SF unencumbered @ $10,50 per SF or $160,000 per DU 0 SF encumbered @ per SF or per DU 213,241 total SF @ $10.50 [mprovement Volue &-fore Structures Site improvements TOTAL SUBJECT VALUE BEFORE PROJECT Indicated Subject Value After Project Highest and Best Use After: Land Value Aker 214,356 SF unencumbered @ 1,115 SF encumbered 215,471 total SF @ lmarovernent Value &-fare Structures Site improvements TOTAL SUBJECT VALUE BEFORE PROJECT Estimated value allocation of rights acquired Lend Transfer from city to owner Structures Site improvements Total net acquisition Plus damages and cost to cure Less special benefits, if any Estimated difference in market value 14-lot residential subdivision $10.50 per SF $160,500 per DU (reflected in unencumbered value estimate) $10.43 2,230 SF $500 per DU $3.14 per SF Amount RnrmrlPrl $2,240,000 $2,240,000 $0 $0 $2,240,000 $2,240.000 Not affected Not affected $2,240,000 $2,247,000 $2,247,000 $0 $0 $2,247,000 $2,247,000 Not affected Not affected $2,247,000 $7,000 Not affected Not affected $7,000 $0 $0 $7,000 r Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 56 Packet Pg. 226 ki Valbridge OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ';;{�:'• PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions: 1. The legal description — if furnished to us — is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility is assumed for legal matters, questions of survey or title, soil or subsoil conditions, engineering, availability or capacity of utilities, or other similar technical matters. The appraisal does not constitute a survey of the property appraised. All existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded and the property is appraised as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management unless otherwise noted. 3. Unless otherwise noted, the appraisal will value the property as though free of contamination. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound will conduct no hazardous materials or contamination inspection of any kind. It is recommended that the client hire an expert if the presence of hazardous materials or contamination poses any concern. 4. The stamps and/or consideration placed on deeds used to indicate sales are in correct relationship to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5. Unless otherwise noted, it is assumed there are no encroachments, zoning violations or restrictions existing in the subject property. 6. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appraisal, unless previous arrangements have been made. 7. Unless expressly specified in the engagement letter, the fee for this appraisal does not include the attendance or giving of testimony by Appraiser at any court, regulatory, or other proceedings, or any conferences or other work in preparation for such proceeding. If any partner or employee of Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound is asked or required to appear and/or testify at any deposition, trial, or other proceeding about the preparation, conclusions or any other aspect of this assignment, client shall compensate Appraiser for the time spent by the partner or employee in appearing and/or testifying and in preparing to testify according to the Appraiser's then current hourly rate plus reimbursement of expenses. 8. The values for land and/or improvements, as contained in this report, are constituent parts of the total value reported and neither is (or are) to be used in making a summation appraisal of a combination of values created by another appraiser. Either is invalidated if so used. 9. The dates of value to which the opinions expressed in this report apply are set forth in this report. We assume no responsibility for economic or physical factors occurring at some point at a later date, which may affect the opinions stated herein. The forecasts, projections, or operating estimates contained herein are based on current market conditions and anticipated short-term supply and demand factors and are subject to change with future conditions. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 57 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 227 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 10. The sketches, maps, plats and exhibits in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property and assumed no responsibility in connection with such matters. 11. The information. estimates and opinions which were obtained from sources outside of this office, are considered reliable. However, no liability for them can be assumed by the appraiser. 12. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to property value, the identity of the appraisers, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organization or the firm with which the appraisers are connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval. 11 No claim is intended to be expressed for matters of expertise that would require specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that ordinarily employed by real estate appraisers. We claim no expertise in areas such as, but not limited to, legal, survey, structural, environmental, pest control, mechanical, etc. 14. This appraisal was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the client for the function outlined x herein. Any party who is not the client or intended user identified in the appraisal or 2 engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without express -0 written consent of Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound and Client. The Client shall not a include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party addressed herein. The appraiser assumes in no obligation, liability or accountability to any third party. 15. Distribution of this report is at the sole discretion of the client, but third -parties not listed as L a an intended user on the face of the appraisal or the engagement letter may not rely upon the Q- a contents of the appraisal. In no event, shall client give a third -party a partial copy of the appraisal report. We will make no distribution of the report without the specific direction of the client. x w 16. This appraisal shall be used only for the function outlined herein, unless expressly authorized by Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound. E 17. This appraisal shall be considered in its entirety. No part thereof shall be used separately or z U r out of context. Q 18. Unless otherwise noted in the body of this report, this appraisal assumes that the subject property does not fall within the areas where mandatory flood insurance is effective. Unless otherwise noted, we have not completed nor have we contracted to have completed an investigation to identify and/or quantify the presence of non -tidal wetland conditions on the subject property. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 58 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 228 9.1.g Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14 LOT PLAT Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 19. The flood maps are not site specific. We are not qualified to confirm the location of the subject property in relation to flood hazard areas based on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or other surveying techniques. It is recommended that the client obtain a confirmation of the subject property's flood zone classification from a licensed surveyor. 20. If the appraisal is for mortgage loan purposes 1) we assume satisfactory completion of improvements if construction is not complete, 2) no consideration has been given for rent loss during rent -up unless noted in the body of this report, and 3) occupancy at levels consistent with our "Income and Expense Projection" are anticipated. 21. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover them. 22. Our inspection included an observation of the land and improvements thereon only. It was not possible to observe conditions beneath the soil or hidden structural components within the improvements. We inspected the buildings involved, and reported damage (if any) by termites, dry rot, wet rot, or other infestations as a matter of information, and no guarantee of the amount or degree of damage (if any) is implied. Condition of heating, cooling, ventilation, electrical and plumbing equipment is considered to be commensurate with the condition of the balance of the improvements unless otherwise stated. Should the client have concerns in these areas, it is the client's responsibility to order the appropriate inspections. The appraiser does not have the skill or expertise to make such inspections and assumes no responsibility for these items. 23. This appraisal does not guarantee compliance with building code and life safety code requirements of the local jurisdiction. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, certificates of occupancy or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national governmental or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value conclusion contained in this report is based unless specifically stated to the contrary. 24. When possible, we have relied upon building measurements provided by the client, owner, or associated agents of these parties. In the absence of a detailed rent roll, reliable public records, or "as -built" plans provided to us, we have relied upon our own measurements of the subject improvements. We follow typical appraisal industry methods; however, we recognize that some factors may limit our ability to obtain accurate measurements including, but not limited to, property access on the day of inspection, basements, fenced/gated areas, grade elevations, greenery/shrubbery, uneven surfaces, multiple story structures, obtuse or acute wall angles, immobile obstructions, etc. Professional building area measurements of the quality, level of detail, or accuracy of professional measurement services are beyond the scope of this appraisal assignment. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 59 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 229 9.1.g 01111 Valbridge .;}. PROPERTY ADVISORS OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14 LOT PLAT Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 25. We have attempted to reconcile sources of data discovered or provided during the appraisal process, including assessment department data. Ultimately, the measurements that are deemed by us to be the most accurate and/or reliable are used within this report. While the measurements and any accompanying sketches are considered to be reasonably accurate and reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Should the client desire a greater level of measuring detail, they are urged to retain the measurement services of a qualified professional (space planner, architect or building engineer). We reserve the right to use an alternative source of building size and amend the analysis, narrative and concluded values (at additional cost) should this alternative measurement source reflect or reveal substantial differences with the measurements used within the report. 26. In the absence of being provided with a detailed land survey, we have used assessment department data to ascertain the physical dimensions and acreage of the property. Should a survey prove this information to be inaccurate, we reserve the right to amend this appraisal (at additional cost) if substantial differences are discovered. 27. If only preliminary plans and specifications were available for use in the preparation of this appraisal, then this appraisal is subject to a review of the final plans and specifications when available (at additional cost) and we reserve the right to amend this appraisal if substantial differences are discovered. 28. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that the property is free of contamination, environmental impairment or hazardous materials. Unless otherwise stated, the existence of hazardous material was not observed by the appraiser and the appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required for discovery. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 29. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey of the property to determine if it is in conformity with the various requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance surrey of the property, together with an analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this could have a negative effect on the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible noncompliance with the requirements of ADA in developing an opinion of value. 30. This appraisal applies to the land and building improvements only. The value of trade fixtures, furnishings, and other equipment, or subsurface rights (minerals, gas, and oil) were not considered in this appraisal unless specifically stated to the contrary. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 60 18-0323 OlympicView:docx Packet Pg. 230 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS C)LYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14 LOT PLAT Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 31. No changes in any federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated, unless specifically stated to the contrary. 32. Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only for the purpose of estimating value and do not constitute prediction of future operating results. Furthermore, it is inevitable that some assumptions will not materialize and that unanticipated events may occur that will likely affect actual performance. 33. Any estimate of insurable value, if included within the scope of work and presented herein, is based upon figures developed consistent with industry practices. However, actual local and regional construction costs may vary significantly from our estimate and individual insurance policies and underwriters have varied specifications, exclusions, and non -insurable items. As such, we strongly recommend that the Client obtain estimates from professionals experienced in establishing insurance coverage. This analysis should not be relied upon to determine insurance coverage and we make no warranties regarding the accuracy of this estimate. 34. The data gathered in the course of this assignment (except data furnished by the Client) shall remain the property of the Appraiser. The appraiser will not violate the confidential nature of the appraiser -client relationship by improperly disclosing any confidential information furnished to the appraiser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Appraiser is authorized by the client to disclose all or any portion of the appraisal and related appraisal data to appropriate representatives of the Appraisal Institute if such disclosure is required to enable the appraiser to comply with the Bylaws and Regulations of such Institute now or hereafter in effect. 35. You and Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound both agree that any dispute over matters in excess of $5,000 will be submitted for resolution by arbitration. This includes fee disputes and any claim of malpractice. The arbitrator shall be mutually selected. If Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound and the client cannot agree on the arbitrator, the presiding head of the Local County Mediation & Arbitration panel shall select the arbitrator. Such arbitration shall be binding and final. In agreeing to arbitration, we both acknowledge that, by agreeing to binding arbitration, each of us is giving up the right to have the dispute decided in a court of law before a judge orjury. In the event that the client, or any other party, makes a claim against Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound or any of its employees in connections with or in any way relating to this assignment, the maximum damages recoverable by such claimant shall be the amount actually received by Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound for this assignment, and under no circumstances shall any claim for consequential damages be made. 36. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound shall have no obligation, liability, or accountability to any third party. Any party who is not the "client" or intended user identified on the face of the appraisal or in the engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without the express written consent of Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound. "Client" shall not include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party named in the engagement letter. Client shall hold Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound and its employees harmless in the event of any lawsuit brought by any third party, lender, partner, or part-owner in any form of ownership or any other party as a result of this assignment. The client also agrees that Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 61 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 231 9.1.g �1 Valbridge ,ueti4 PROPERTY ADVISOR!; VIEW DRIVE 14 LOT PLAT Puget Sound GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS in case of lawsuit arising from or in any way involving these appraisal services, client will hold Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound harmless from and against any liability, loss, cost, or expense incurred or suffered by Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound in such action, regardless of its outcome. 37. The Valbridge Property Advisors office responsible for the preparation of this report is independently owned and operated by Puget Sound. Neither Valbridge Property Advisors, Inc., nor any of its affiliates has been engaged to provide this report. Valbridge Property Advisors, Inc. does not provide valuation services, and has taken no part in the preparation of this report. 38. If any claim is filed against any of Valbridge Property Advisors, Inc., a Florida Corporation, its affiliates, officers or employees, or the firm providing this report, in connection with, or in any way arising out of, or relating to, this report, or the engagement of the firm providing this report, then (1) under no circumstances shall such claimant be entitled to consequential, special or other damages, except only for direct compensatory damages, and (2) the maximum amount of such compensatory damages recoverable by such claimant shall be the amount actually received by the firm engaged to provide this report. 39. This report and any associated work files may be subject to evaluation by Valbridge Property Advisors, Inc., or its affiliates, for quality control purposes. 40. Acceptance and/or use of this appraisal report constitutes acceptance of the foregoing general assumptions and limiting conditions. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 62 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Q Packet Pg. 232 9.1.g CERTIFICATION — ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. c 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal 0 interest with respect to the parties involved. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound appraised the property thirteen months earlier for the City of Lynnwood. The value conclusion was $50.00/SF, which reflected land value as well as anticipated L .r demolition costs and entitlements as of the valuation date (September 24, 2017). The current rn $63.00/SF estimate reflects current market conditions, together with the fact that the building has N been demolished and the owner received conditional approval from Community Development. m I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved co with this assignment. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined 00 results. o My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly = related to the intended use of this appraisal. 2 My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in a conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. I have made a personal inspection of the exterior of the property that is the subject of this report. N The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, Mn in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of a Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Q The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program for Designated t x w Members of the Appraisal Institute. ; c m % U Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Q State Certification No. 27011-1100517 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 63 Packet Pg. 233 9.1.g CERTIFICATION — PAUL C. BIRD, SENIOR ASSOCIATE I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. c 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal 0 interest with respect to the parties involved. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound appraised the property thirteen months earlier for the City of Lynnwood. The value conclusion was $50.00/SF, which reflected land value as well as anticipated ;v .r demolition costs and entitlements as of the valuation date (September 24, 2017). The current U) $63.00/SF estimate reflects current market conditions, together with the fact that the building has N been demolished and the owner received conditional approval from Community Development. m I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involvedco with this assignment. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined 00 results. o My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly = related to the intended use of this appraisal. 2 My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in a conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. I have made a personal inspection of the exterior of the property that is the subject of this report. N The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, Mn in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of a Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Q The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. t x w c m E Paul C. Bird, Senior Associate U WA State Certified - General Appraiser No. 1100902 r Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 64 Packet Pg. 234 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound ADDENDA Appraiser Qualifications OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ADDENDA Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 65 Packet Pg. 235 9.1.g 1 Valbridge �Ii:;;'r;�1 PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound QUALIFICATIONS OF ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI Senior Managing Director Valbridge Property Advisors) Puget Sound Erli iratinn Bachelor of Arts in Economics, Washington State University, 1983. OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT Professional Education Appraisal Courses: All appraisal courses required for MAI designation. Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): • Environmental & Property Dangers ■ UASFLA Seminar (Yellow Book) ■ Introduction to Valuation for Financial Reporting + Eminent Domain and Condemnation • Evaluating Commercial Construction ■ The Road Less Traveled: Special Purpose Properties • The Appraiser as Expert Witness • Litigation Appraising: Specialized Topics and Applications ■ Appraiser Consulting: A Solutions Approach for Professionals • Subdivision Valuation Professional Affiliation ADDENDA Member, Appraisal Institute. Received MAI Designation in 1995. (Member No. 10,712) Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Member, International Right -of -Way Association Past Board of Trustees - Washington Center for Real Estate Research Appraisal Experience Principal with Macaulay& Associates. Appraisal assignments include a wide variety of commercial, industrial and residential properties for financial institutions, governmental entities, law firms, corporations and private individuals. Examples include office buildings, retail shopping centers, multifamily residential complexes, industrial warehouses, restaurants, retail stores, mobile home parks, service stations, single family subdivisions and special purpose properties. Other valuation assignments cover rental valuations, partial interest studies (leasehold/leased fee estates), waterfront commercial and industrial properties for various port authorities, together with remote large acreage agricultural and forest land. Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 66 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 236 9.1.g kll�Valbridge .;;::� PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ADDENDA ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) One of Mr. Macaulay's specialties in which he has extensive knowledge and over 25 years of experience with is Local improvement district (LID) special benefit and feasibility study analysis. Robert's (LID) special benefit and feasibility study experience includes a variety of road Improvement, utility and other infrastructure projects. The firm's extensive experience with these projects dates back to 1975. Right-of-way projects include easement analysis for the United States Navy and analysis of 70+ parcels for the City of Renton for acquisition and easement purposes. Numerous appraisals were also prepared for a large trunk water line easement extending under the Snohomish River to the Tulalip Tribes and City of Marysville for the City of Everett. Similar to right-of-way work, special benefit and economic feasibility studies have been completed for the cities of Marysville, Vancouver, Bellevue, Burien, Ferndale, Freeland, Kent, Lynnwood, Ocean Shores, and Yelm (2006 to 2015). Consultation work on a road improvement district (RID) project for unincorporated Clallam County was performed in 2010. Other current or recently completed projects (2010-2014) include special benefit and feasibility studies for the cities of Bellevue, Edgewood, Freeland, Lynnwood and Tacoma. In addition to over 30 other feasibility and special benefit studies completed. A wide variety of multi -parcel right-of-way acquisition appraisals have been completed, such as riverbank protection easements for the City of Tukwila, right-of-way acquisition for road widening for the City of Bellingham and utility line easements, road widening and other public improvement projects for the City of Everett. A large right-of-way project for the Montana Department of Highways near Kalispell, Montana was completed several years ago. Also, eminent domain appraisals have been completed for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad in Wenatchee and Tacoma. Other special purpose assignments are 6,000 acres on the Tulalip Indian Reservation for the Tulalip Tribes, 80 acres on Burrows Island in Skagit County, 900 acres in Skagit County for Skagit County Parks and Recreation Department, and the Eagle Harbor ferry maintenance site on Bainbridge Island for WSDOT. Various reports on mineral rights have been completed, including an 80-acre operating quarry in Bremerton, WA. Testified in various cases in King, Snohomish and Skagit counties, together with presentations at LID hearings on preliminary and final assessment rolls. Qualified as expert witness in the states of Washington and Montana. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 67 1 B-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 237 9.1.g Valbridge .:: .,,,,.. PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ADDENDA Other Experience Mr. Macaulay has been involved with MRSC dating back to the late 1990's and involves published (and updated) information on their website pertaining to local improvement district (LID) special benefit analysis, methodology and proportionality issues for a wide range of LID projects such as freeway interchange/arterial road improvements, utility (large sewer/water installation) infrastructure, slope stabilization, bridge improvements and other related publicly funded development. Numerous presentations have been made around the state for MRSC involving LID analysis examples completed for various cities and utility districts. Conferences have been made touching upon a wide variety of special benefit analysis issues relating to a wide variety of LID projects ranging from $500,000 to over 100 million in project cost. Representative Client list CitieslCou nties Cities of Aberdeen, Arlington, Bellevue, Bellingham, Blaine, Bothell, Burlington, Edgewood, Edmonds, Everett, Ferndale, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Lacey, Lake Forest Park, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Mount Vernon, Mukilteo, Oak Harbor, Ocean Shores, Pacific, Port Townsend, Redmond, Renton, Seattle, Shoreline, Stanwood, Sultan, Tacoma, Vancouver, Wenatchee and Washougal. Counties of Clark, Clallam, Douglas, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Thurston and Whatcom. Government Ports of Anacortes, Edmonds, Everett, Seattle and Skagit County. Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Monroe, Mukilteo, Marysville and Snohomish School Districts. Washington State Parks, WSDOT (Approved Appraiser/Reviewer Lists), DNR, WA State Attorney General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy, Everett Parks Foundation, Seattle DOT, University of Washington, Department of Interior, Snohomish County PUD, Skagit County PUD, Montana Department of Highways, Financial Institutions Anchor Bank, Bank of Washington, Banner Bank, BECU, China Trust Bank, Coastal Community Bank, Columbia Bank, Commerce Bank, First Savings Bank Northwest, GBC International Bank, Heritage Bank, Homestreet Bank, Key Bank, Mountain Pacific Bank, One Pacific Coast Bank, Opus Bank, Prime Pacific Bank, Peoples Bank, US Bancorp and Wells Fargo. Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound Page 68 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Packet Pg. 238 9.1.g Va I bridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) Corporations. Law Firms and Non Profits OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ADDENDA Weyerhaeuser Company, Puget Sound Energy, SCA Engineering, Entranco Engineering, The Trust for Public Land, OTAK, HDR, Inc., The Boeing Company, Coates Field Service, Inc., Perteet Engineering, Gray & Osborne, Inc., Tetra Tech, Steven j. Fields, Brewe Layman, Weed, Graafstra & Benson, Inc., P.S., Anderson Hunter, Foster Pepper, Burgess, Fitzer, Leighton & Phillips, Inslee, Best & Dozier, Preston, Gates & Ellis. State Certification Number -General: 1100517 Expiration: 10/10/19 (Revised 02/13/15) Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 69 Packet Pg. 239 9.1.g Valbridge OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ! It.J/ 1 L���..rr ADDENDA ;;•;; PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound QUALIFICATIONS OF PAUL C. BIRD, SENIOR ASSOCIATE Senior Associate Valbridqe Property Advisors I Puget Sound Education Bachelor of Arts in Business and Accounting, University of Washington, 1984. Professional Education Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): ■ Ad Valorem Taxation ■ Construction Details and Trends • Environmental Issues • Business and Partial Interest Valuation • Land and Site Valuation • Appraisal of Self -Storage Facilities • The Appraiser as Expert Witness • Appraisal of Assisted Living Facilities • Subdivision Valuation Professional Affiliation Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Appraisal Experience Senior Associate with Macaulay & Associates. Appraisal assignments include a wide variety of commercial, industrial and residential properties for financial institutions, governmental entities, law firms, corporations and private individuals. Examples include office buildings, retail shopping centers, multifamily residential complexes, industrial warehouses, restaurants, retail stores, mobile home parks, self -storage facilities, residential subdivisions and special purpose properties. Other valuation assignments cover rental valuations, partial interest studies, appraisals of leasehold and leased fee estates, waterfront commercial and industrial properties for various port authorities. Additional experience includes knowledge and over 20 years of experience with local improvement district (LID) special benefit and feasibility study analysis, including a variety of road improvement, utility and other infrastructure projects. The firm's extensive experience with these projects dates back to 1975. Right-of-way experience includes partial and total acquisitions for road improvement projects and easements, the most notable being the acquisition of twenty properties across two city blocks for development of Xfinity Arena in Everett. Mn L Q Q Q x w c N E z U a r r Q Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 70 Packet Pg. 240 9.1.g Valbridge PROPERTY ADVISORS Puget Sound OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE 14-LOT PLAT ADDENDA PAUL C. BIRD (cont.) Similar to right-of-way work, special benefit and economic feasibility studies have been completed for the cities of Marysville, Lynnwood, Tacoma, Kent, Tukwila and Ocean Shores (2009 to 2015). Testified In various cases in Snohomish County Court, along with expert witness testimony at LID hearings, arbitration, mediation and Board of Equalization hearings. Other Experience Prior to Macaulay & Associates, Ltd., Mr. Bird was an analyst and manager of the Commercial Real Estate Portfolio Management Department in the Special Credits Division at Washington Mutual Savings Bank, from 1987 to 1991. Representative Client List Cities/Counties Cities of Arlington, Bellevue, Bellingham, Bothell, Edmonds, Everett, Issaquah, Kent, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Mukilteo, Ocean Shores, Pacific, Redmond, Snohomish, Sultan, Tacoma. Counties of Snohomish, Island and King. Government Ports of Edmonds and Everett. Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood and Marysville School Districts. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy. Financial Institutions Bank of Washington, Banner Bank, Boeing Employees Credit Union, China Trust Bank, Coastal Community Bank, Columbia Bank, Commerce Bank, First Savings Bank Northwest, GBC International Bank, Heritage Bank, HomeStreet Bank, Mountain Pacific Bank, One Pacific Coast Bank, Opus Bank, Prime Pacific Bank, Peoples Bank, and US Bancorp. Corporations, Law Firms and Non Profits Gray & Osborne, Inc., Steven J. Fields, Brewe Layman, Jelsing Tri, West & Andrus, Anderson Hunter, Skotdal Real Estate. State Certification Number - General: 1100902 Expiration: 12/09/2020 Valbridge Property Advisors I Puget Sound 18-0323 OlympicView.docx Page 71 Packet Pg. 241 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Learning Enhancement & Activity Program (LEAP) Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Angie Feser Background/History This agenda item is to provide additional information of the new recreation program LEAP as requested by Council at the August 25, 2020 Regular Meeting. Staff is requesting the consideration of Council's approval for two new lob descriptions to implement the proposed program and Council direction related to additional city funding allocation for program registration fee waivers. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve the new job description of Recreation Leader II and revised Recreation Leader - General in order for the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department to implement a new program which will provide safe and affordable recreation and academic support for Edmonds area school -aged youth during the Edmonds School District's distance learning educational model. Narrative LEAP (Learning Enhancement & Activity Program) In response to the Edmonds School District (ESD) distance learning educational model, the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services (PRCS) Department is developing a new recreation program called LEAP (Learning Enhancement & Activity Program) to provide a safe and affordable day camp program that supports academic efforts for the children and families in Edmonds. Program Summary This program will re -purpose the Frances Anderson Center (FAC) for a day camp with distance learning academic support for Edmonds children entering 2nd - 6t" grades. The program will run Monday - Friday, 7:00am to 6:00pm with emphasis on pod group activities 8:30am - 4:30pm. Weekly registration is $300/resident and $345/non-resident per participant. Currently, the program is design to provide need - based full registration waivers for 20% of the participants each week. Program capacity is 100 participants. Similar grade -level kids will be generally isolated into room -based pods in the FAC classrooms and each room will have at least two staff members to provide a 1:10 staff/child ratio minimum. This ratio allows Packet Pg. 242 9.2 better safety practices, facilitation of distance learning support and will provide the ability to keep pods isolated from one another and other building tenants as much as possible to reduce potential COVID exposure. It also helps contain any potential outbreak to just one pod. The Department's Environmental Education and Cultural Arts divisions as well as community partners such as possibly Sno-King Youth Club will provide additional day camp programming. Safety is a high priority and all components of the program will adhere to current COVID Federal (CDC), State of Washington, Snohomish Health District health and safety guidelines as well as City of Edmonds employee and operating policies and procedures related to COVID. Current practices include mask wearing, social distancing, frequent cleaning and sanitation, pod group isolation, program drop-off/pick- up outside of the facility, health screenings and related activities that support the safety of staff, participants and families and building occupants. This program was developed to provide child care and academic support for Edmonds families impacted by the Edmonds School District's current distance learning model. It is to provide an option for households of school -aged children that may not be able to work from home and/or need support in their children's academic efforts during this time. There are more than 3,000 children enrolled in Edmond area schools entering the 2nd - 6`" grade. Only one ESD partnered child care program is offered with in the city limits and that is provided by the Dale Turner YMCA at Chase Lake Elementary. The LEAP program is based on community need, which is driven by ESD's current distant learning educational approach. We are closely monitoring the District's at-home daily education schedule to best support program participants academic needs while in the program. LEAP's implementation is based on the District's school -year approach and we are operating this program based on the school's benchmark decision points in November, February and April to determine if this program continues, is modified or ends by June, 2021. Program Budget The proposed budget for this program has the capability to be cost -neutral in that the registration fees generated in the current model can cover the direct costs including the one-time startup costs and on- going staffing and operating expenses. As a service -based program, a majority of the expenses are in staff costs. The staffing need is dependent upon participant enrollment and is very flexible due to the pod group allocations. If enrollment is less than capacity the related staff usually required are not scheduled for that week and therefore, the decrease in revenue is off -set by the decrease in expenditures. Attachment #1- LEAP Budget shows the total estimated budget for a full academic year (9-month) program and monthly averages. Included in the expenditure calculations are expenditures based on Recreation Leader Its and Recreation Leader positions working in temporary status for the first five months, then converting to permanent full-time employees with benefits for the last four months of the academic year. Also detailed in the Attachment is the LEAP budget at both 100% and 50% capacity to illustrate the program's capability of revenues offsetting expenditures including start-up costs, staffing and program operating supplies. The budget incorporates full registration fee waivers for 20% of participants. There is built-in contingency of 5% because COVID related programming is continually changing and there may be unknown expenditures in the future related to different health and safety guidelines and practices. Packet Pg. 243 9.2 In summary, the PRCS department is utilizing the current recreation programming facility resource and staff to provide for a new community need. No 2020 Budget Amendment Necessa COVID impacts have significantly decreased revenue and expenditures in the 2020 Recreation Division budget. The LEAP program's estimated revenues and expenditures are well within the council approved budget allocation for 2020, no budget amendment is needed. (Attachment #1 - LEAP Budget) Waivers and Alternative Funding Sources Currently the program is able to support full registration waivers for 20% of weekly participants. There is a small margin of surplus in the estimated budget that could allow for a few more full or partial waivers, but with COVID response uncertainties the expenditures and revenues were estimated conservatively. Council has requested the research of providing additional registration waivers and the following are some options. Citv Funded Waivers Additional waivers could be provided with Council allocating additional funding. It is suggested to consider these waiver options through the end of the calendar year and re -visit options during the 2021 budget process if it appears the program will continue into next year. The financial impact of twenty (20) additional partial waivers (50%) for use by hardship/income-based need at $150 per week each are as follows - 9 - Month Monthly End of Year Program (20) Waivers @ 50% $ 12,000 $ 36,000 $ 108,000 The budget source to cover the program expenditures should be identified by Council with some options including General Fund or the Council's Miscellaneous Fund (commonly referred to as Contingency Fund by the Council) which currently has a little less than $30,000. There may be other budget sources and if so, staff will update this information during the September 1't Council meeting presentation. Other Sources of Waiver Funding The staff was able to do some preliminary research into possible alternative funding sources. With the pandemic, many non-traditional relief funding sources have developed and may continue to become available. The city is evaluating how to possibly utilize current day care eligible CARES funding for Edmonds families. A condition that requires further investigation is that the funds are intended to be spent by end of October of this year. Ways to apply the funding for services beyond the October deadline are currently in legal review. In addition, staff has applied for the Verdant Health Emergency COVID Assistance program requesting funding to support 5 - 10 weekly full registration waivers through the end of this year (end of program eligibility). This is an open application process and the grant request response timeline is currently unknown. Other possible funding sources to be researched further include an Office of Public Schools and Instruction (OPSI) program related to Certificated Teachers; potential eligibility and use of a second Packet Pg. 244 9.2 round of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG); and a local campaign soliciting donations through the PRCS Department's existing scholarship program to provide additional weekly registrations for low-income or COVID impacted Edmonds families. Staff will report on any updated information related to these potential funding sources during the September 1" council meeting and will continue to seek funding in an effort to offer maximum fee waivers in the future. Council Review and Approval In order to implement this program, two new recreation staff positions are necessary to recruit and secure high -quality personnel. The positions are Recreation Leader II (Attachment #2) and Recreation Leader - General (Attachment #3). The strategy is to create positions that compensate a bit higher than existing typical recreation leader positions to possibly recruit substitute teachers, para-educators or individuals who have teaching experience or are studying teaching or similar areas of study. Staff is requesting the Council's required approval of these two positions for the department to proceed with program development and begin recruiting, hiring and training staff for the LEAP program. A full capacity program at the Frances Anderson Center will require nine (9) full-time Recreation Leader II, nine (9) full-time Recreation Leader - General and four (4) part-time Recreation Leader - General staff members. Actual weekly staff numbers will be based on enrollment and program need. Attachments: Attachment #1 - LEAP Budget Attachment #2 Recreation Leader II Attachment #3 Recreation Leader - General Packet Pg. 245 9.2.a Attachment #1 — LEAP Budget Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department 2020-2021 LEAP Program Budget Information August 27, 2020 LEAP Budget The following illustrates the LEAP Program budget with registration at 100% capacity and 50% capacity for 100 participants at $300 per week and 20% of participants with a full registration fee waiver. LEAP Budget (9-months), 100% registration REVENUE Full Fee ($300) Full Waiver EXPENDITURES Staff Program Coordinator - Recreation Coordinator Recreation Leader II - (8 hrs) Recreation Leader - General - (8 hrs) Recreation Leader - General - (5.5 hrs) Comcast WiFi ActiveNet (registration technology fee) Supplies Contingency Total Monthly 9-Month Qty Unit Amount Amount 80 $ 300 $ 96,000 $ 864,000 20 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 96,000 $ 864,000 9-Month Qty Unit/Each Total Monthly Amount 1 $ 6,419 $ 6,419 $ 57,767 9 $ 4,064 $ 36,573 $ 329,159 9 $ 3,488 $ 31,394 $ 282,543 4 $ 1,962 $ 7,848 $ 70,636 1 $ 100 $ 100 $ 900 $ 4,080 $ 36,720 9 $ 100 $ 900 $ 8,100 1 $ 4,800 $ 4,800 $ 43,200 TOTAL $ 92,114 $ 829,024 Difference $ 3,886 $ 34,976 Additional one-time expenses $3,810 Start -Up Costs (equipment, COVID supplies) $15,000 WiFi Improvements eligible for CARES funding reimbursement r a 1 Packet Pg. 246 9.2.a Attachment #1 — LEAP Budget LEAP Budget (9-months), 50% registration Because the program model is service -based and flexible week to week, related staffing expenditures can decrease if participation is a fraction of capacity. REVENUE Full Fee ($300) Full Waiver EXPENDITURES Staff Program Coordinator - Recreation Coordinator Recreation Leader II - (Pod Lead) Recreation Leader - General - (8 hrs) Recreation Leader - General - (5.5 hrs) Comcast WiFi ActiveNet (registration technology fee) Supplies Contingency Qty Unit Total Monthly 50 300 $ 60,000 $ 0 0 $ - $ TOTAL $ 60,000 $ TOTAL Difference Qty 1 5 5 4 1 5 1 Unit/Each Total Monthly $ 6,419 $ 6,419 $ $ 4,064 $ 18,287 $ $ 3,488 $ 15,697 $ $ 1,962 $ 7,848 $ $ 100 $ 100 $ $ 2,550 $ $ 100 $ 450 $ $ 4,800 $ 3,000 $ $ 54,350 $ $ 5,650 $ 9-Month Amount 540,000 540,000 9-Month Amount 57,767 164,580 141,271 70,636 900 22,950 4,050 27,000 489,153 50,847 Additional one-time expenses r $3,810 Start -Up Costs (equipment, COVID supplies) $15,000 WiFi Improvements eligible for CARES funding reimbursement m IL a W J C N E t V Q r C d E t V 2 r a 2 Packet Pg. 247 9.2.a Attachment #1 — LEAP Budget 2020 Budget Amendment Due to the COVID impacts there are significant decreases of revenue and expenditures in the 2020 Recreation Division budget. This program's estimated revenues and expenditures are well within the council approved budget allocation in 2020, therefore a budget amendment is not needed. The following table shows both revenue and expenses for the Recreation Division both as originally budgeted (adopted) and the Year End Estimate, done in July, and the difference between the two. 2020 Recreation Division Revenue Revenue Difference Budget Budget YE Est Recreation Division $1,111,012 $ 305,135 $ 805,877 LEAP Revenue $ 264,000 Expense Expense Difference Budget YE Est Recreation Division $1,930,922 $1,423,800 $ 507,122 LEAP Expenditures $ 257,123 3 Packet Pg. 248 Attachment #2 - Recreation Leader II Job �y of ED4f City of G EDMONDS _ Washington Recreation Leader II Parks, Recreation & Cultural Department: Services Pay Grade: H12 Bargaining Unit: AFSCME Council 2 FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Recreation Revised Date: 8/19/2020 Reports To: Supervisor POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, this position is responsible for providing the planning, organization, and implementation of effective, healthy, and safe school -aged youth recreation and instruction programs to include, but not limited to, supporting distance learning activities as prescribed by educational organizations, in a classroom -like environment, and other day camp recreation activities. Candidate should have strong organizational, leadership and communication skills with a commitment to providing quality recreation and instruction activities to each and every youth participant. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Responsible for the daily work management of the Recreation Leader — General job classification. • Facilitate classroom -like operations which support participant academic enrichment • Provide leadership and effective problem -solving skills • Lead youth recreation programs and provide academic enrichment support • Monitor and maintain cleanliness of facility to include following COVID safety procedures such as frequent wiping of high touch surfaces • Monitor and implement current COVID health and safety guidelines such as health screening, temperature taking and enforcing mask requirements • Monitor the safety of children and supervised Recreation Assistant(s) • Handle minor emergent situations that may arise as per city policy • Complete reports and file paperwork as needed. • Communicate with participants and guardians in a manner that favorably represents the City of Edmonds. May be tasked with performing related duties as required. Related duties are duties that may not be specifically listed in the position description, but are within the general occupational series and responsibility level typically associated with the employee's classification of work. Required Knowledge of: • Knowledge of and ability to administer CPR, AED, and First Aid • Knowledge of and ability to use leadership and supervisory methods to motivate staff • Knowledge of and ability to positively influence, engage, and motivate youth Required Skill in: Communicate effectively orally and in writing Consistently provide quality customer service Packet Pg. 249 9.2.b 2 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Recreation Leader II • Learn and apply new skills • Solve problems effectively and efficiently • Planning and preparation of age -appropriate activities for youth • Remaining calm in an environment that is sometimes stressful, with distractions and interruptions • Ability to shift priorities rapidly • Ability to use computers and software to assist in the use of the Edmonds School District distance learning platform with program participants MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: • Must be 21 years of age or older • High school diploma • One year of experience leading or teaching school -aged youth programs such as day camp or day care. • One year of college coursework in Recreation, Education, and/or related field. • Any equivalent combination of education, training, experience, knowledge, and abilities which would allow individual to perform the duties of the position will be considered Preferred Qualifications: • Completion of thirty or more college quarter credits or combination of one-third clock hours and two- thirds college credits in early childhood education/child development, elementary education, social work, or another child -related field. Required Licenses or Certifications: • Current CPR and First Aid or ability to obtain by start date • Must be able to successfully complete and pass a pre -employment background check WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Indoor and outdoor environment • Classroom environment • Constant interruptions • Sometimes loud/noisy • This position will generally work a regular Monday through Friday 8 am -5 pm schedule, however this schedule may change as necessary to meet the needs of the program and the incumbent must be able to work alternative schedules as necessary. Physical Abilities: • Required to wear a face covering (mask) at all times • Sit or stand for extended periods of time • Specific vision abilities include close vision, distance vision, color vision, peripheral vision, depth perception, and the ability to adjust focus in order to maintain surveillance of participants and employees • Stoop, kneel, twist, bend, crouch or crawl • Walk up and down stairs • Use hands and fingers to handle or feel objects or equipment • Lift, move and handle minimum of 50 pounds • Move over rough ground, including outdoor playground Hazards: • Potential contact with sick children Last Revis Packet Pg. 250 9.2.b 3 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Recreation Leader II Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Last Revis Packet Pg. 251 Attachment #2 - Recreation Leader - General Job Descripti of E Mph City of ° EDMONDS - Washington •.,�. l,a.. Recreation Leader - General Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Pay Grade: H 10 Bargaining Unit: NA FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Recreation Revised Date: 8/19/2020 Reports To: Supervisor POSITION PURPOSE: Under supervision, this position is responsible for assisting in providing the planning, organization, and implementation of effective, healthy, and safe school -aged youth recreation and instruction programs to include, but not limited to, supporting distance learning activities as prescribed by educational organizations, in a classroom -like environment, and other day camp recreation activities. Candidate should have strong organizational, leadership and communication skills with a commitment to providing quality recreation and instruction activities to each and every youth participant. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all dutiesperformed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbents) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Assist with and lead youth recreation programs • Support classroom -like operations and participant academic enrichment • Provide leadership and effective problem -solving skills • Communicate with participants and guardians in a manner that favorably represents the City of Edmonds. • Monitor and maintain cleanliness of facility to include following COVID safety procedures such as frequent wiping of high touch surfaces • Assist with monitoring and implementing current COVID health and safety guidelines such as health screening, temperature taking and enforcing mask requirements • Monitor the safety of children • Handle minor emergent situations that may arise as per city policy • Assist with site operations as outlined in program handbook • Complete reports and file paperwork as needed • Open and close facility as assigned May be tasked with performing related duties as required. Related duties are duties that may not be specifically listed in the position description, but are within the general occupational series and responsibility level typically associated with the employee's classification of work. Required Knowledge of: • Knowledge of and ability to administer CPR, AED, and First Aid • Knowledge of and ability to positively influence and motivate youth Packet Pg. 252 9.2.c 2 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Recreation Leader - General Required Skill in: • Communicate effectively orally and in writing • Consistently provide quality customer service • Learn and apply new skills • Solve problems effectively and efficiently • Planning and preparation of age -appropriate activities for youth • Remaining calm in an environment that is sometimes stressful, with distractions and interruptions • Ability to shift priorities rapidly • Ability to use computers and software to assist in the use of the Edmonds School District distance learning platform with program participants MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: • Must be 18 years of age or older • High school diploma • Prior work experience with school -aged children is preferred Preferred Qualifications: • One year of experience leading or teaching school -aged youth programs such as day camp or day care. Required Licenses or Certifications: • Current CPR and First Aid or ability to obtain by start date • Must be able to successfully complete and pass a pre -employment background check WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Indoor and outdoor environment • Classroom environment • Constant interruptions • Sometimes loud/noisy • Work is generally performed Monday through Friday and the incumbent may be hired into either morning or afternoon shifts or full day shifts as needed for the purposes of the program to which they are assigned. Physical Abilities: • Required to wear a face covering (mask) at all times • Sit or stand for extended periods of time • Specific vision abilities include close vision, distance vision, color vision, peripheral vision, depth perception, and the ability to adjust focus in order to maintain surveillance of participants and employees • Stoop, kneel, twist, bend, crouch or crawl • Walk up and down stairs • Use hands and fingers to handle or feel objects or equipment • Lift, move and handle minimum of 50 pounds • Move over rough ground, including outdoor playground Hazards: • Potential contact with sick children Packet Pg. 253 9.2.c 3 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Recreation Leader - General Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Packet Pg. 254 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/1/2020 Tree Regulations Code Process Update Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History See narrative. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The City of Edmonds adopted an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) in July 2019 which included goals and policy guidance for tree retention within the City. A code update process has started to begin implementing portions of the UFMP. Exhibit 1 provides an outline of topics and possible concepts that will be explored with the Planning Board in review and updating of the City's tree related regulations. These broad topics include: Tree retention during development - For example, exploring low impact development principles that may provide more flexibility in development to retain trees, specific tree retentions standards during development, and providing incentives for tree retention Establishing a tree fund into which development contributions or tree penalties can be tracked and the proceeds spent on tree planting and preservation Reviewing penalties for illegal tree cutting Moving the main tree regulations for private property into the Natural Resources title of the City's development code Reviewing the existing permitting structure and exemptions for tree removal on currently developed property These topics and related code will be explored extensively with the Planning Board beginning at their September 91" meeting. The goal is to have draft code and recommendation from the Planning Board by the end of 2020. The Citizens Tree Board was briefed on the code update topics at their August 6th meeting and will be consulted periodically as the code specifics are flushed out. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Edmonds Tree Regulations Update Topic Matrix Packet Pg. 255 10.1.a 2020 Edmonds Tree Regulations Update —Topic Matrix Topic Existing Code Possible Amendment Concepts Tree Retention ECDC 18.45.050 notes that "trees shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible." One of the primary concerns we've heard with regard to tree removal in the City of Edmonds is when trees are cleared from a site during the subdivision and/or development of properties. The City could explore regulations The critical area code has a 30% retention of native vegetation requirement for that require a certain amount of trees to be retained and/or planted when a site is developed. If trees are removed properties in the RS-12 and RS-20 zones being subdivided if associated with landslide beyond an established threshold, developers may be required to pay into the Tree Fund. hazard areas, streams, or wetlands (ECDC 23.90.040.C). Apart from the 30% native vegetation requirement in the critical area code, there is no specific tree retention requirement for properties within the City of Edmonds. Low Impact Development Low impact development (LID) in the City development code is primarily related to One of the primary concerns we've heard with regard to tree removal in the City of Edmonds is when trees are stormwater management. ECDC 18.30.010 (definitions related to stormwater code) cleared from a site during the subdivision and/or development of properties. One way to maintain more trees on defines low impact development as "a stormwater and land use strategy that strives to the site is to employ LID planning principles in the subdivision process. Current subdivision and zoning standards do mimic predisturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, not allow much flexibility and by the time the required access, setbacks/developable area, and utilities are applied evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation, use of on -site features, site to a site, often must of the trees end up being removed. Some flexibility during subdivision design that may be planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a explored include flexible setbacks (e.g. modify interior setbacks while maintaining standard exterior setbacks), project design." However, low impact develop principles may be applied much broader, cluster developments, flexible lot design (altering lot width and/size requirements while maintaining the underlying for instance ECDC 24.90.030 (shoreline master program definitions) defines LID zoning density). principles as "land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on - site natural features, and site planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff." Tree Fund The City of Edmonds currently does not have a dedicated Tree Fund Establishing a Tree Fund will be part of the update. Tree Fund management will likely be established in a new chapter located in Title 3 ECC. How money makes it into the tree fund and what the funds may be spent on will have to be explored. Potential funding options include tree cutting violation penalties, dollar amount per tree removed during subdivisions (see Tree Retention), or deposit for replacement trees not planted to meet retention requirement (see Tree Retention topic). Tree fund could be used to issue tree vouchers (money to purchase trees for planting), planting trees elsewhere in the City, funding tree education activities, or other tree related activity. Incentives There are currently not incentives to retain trees or plant trees within the City code. The Urban Forest Management Plan included a specific goal to incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property which included: A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of: i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting and protection. C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees Allowing more flexibility during development of site, such as discussed in the LID topic, also provides an incentive to retain more trees during development. Page 1 of 2 a Packet Pg. 256 10.1.a Topic Existing Code Possible Amendment Concepts Tree Definitions ECDC 18.45.040 currently defines tree as "any living woody plant characterized by one Trees may be defined a number of ways and regulations applied to only certain types of trees. Examples include main stem or trunk and many branches and having a caliper of six inches or greater, or a "significant tree", "protected tree", "landmark tree", "heritage tree", or "street tree". Additionally, some multi -stemmed trunk system with a definitely formed crown." jurisdiction except certain species of trees from their tree regulation requirements (such as red alder). Tree definitions will be explored. Permits/Tree Cutting Review for Currently exemptions from permitting requirements are located in ECDC 18.45.030. The disparity in application fees and process between existing single-family and multi-family/commercial properties Existing Developed Properties Generally speaking, developed single-family properties with no critical areas are exempt should be addressed. from tree cutting permits. If there are critical areas present and the tree is not determined to be a hazard tree (ECDC 23.40.220.C.8.b) then a permit is required to cut The current exemption list contains some dated language and inconsistencies with the critical area code. As such a tree (which includes topping). When a permit is required on single family properties, the exempt activities should be reviewed. Another exemption consideration should be given to nuisance tree it is a Type II staff decision with notice. Type II permits cost $1,010 ($970 application removal. For example, a tree that is not considered a hazard tree but continually damages sewer lines or is buckling fee plus $40 technology fee). In addition to the application fee additional costs may a driveway with its roots may be removed without a permit similar to a hazard tree. include arborist reports and/or critical area reports such a geotechnical report. For existing multi -family and commercial properties tree cutting is reviewed a Type I design review to ensure the property would still comply with the landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. Type I permits cost $315 ($275 application fee plus $40 technology fee). If critical areas are present, additional reports may be required. Hazard tree removal does not require a permit, but does require review by staff. There are no City fees associated with a hazard tree removal review, however there is cost to an applicant to hire an arborist to document the tree as a hazard tree. Penalties/Fines Violations and penalties for tree cutting violations are currently contained in ECDC The code currently defines a tree as any living woody plant characterized by one main stem or trunk and many 18.45.070. Base penalties may be assessed accord to the size of the tree; civil penalty branches and having a caliper of six inches or greater, or a multi -stemmed trunk system with a definitely formed in an amount not to exceed $1,000 penalty for a tree of up to three inches and $3,000 crown. The critical area code also permits the removal of trees less the 4 inches dbh (diameter at breast height) as for a tree three inches or more. These fines are trebled if the tree is located in a critical an allowed activity. Given the current code includes penalties for trees that are smaller than the definition of tree area or the right-of-way for a maximum fine of $9,000 per tree. and trees which may elsewhere in the code be removed from critical areas as an allowed activity, the penalty section should be review and evaluated to establish an appropriate penalty for violation of the City's tree cutting regulations. Any penalties assessed could be deposited in the Tree Fund account. Code Location Tree and vegetation management is spread throughout Edmonds Community Title 18 ECDC is primarily related to Public Works requirement. Since Chapter 18.45 ECDC is related to tree Development Code (ECDC). Primary tree code is located in Chapter 18.45 ECDC — Land regulations on private property and administered by the planning manager, a new chapter (Chapter 23.10 ECDC) Clearing and Tree Cutting Code. Other tree and vegetation regulations are contained will be created in Title 23 ECDC Natural Resources to house the main tree related code chapter. Other potential within Chapters 23.40 — 23.90 ECDC critical area code, the Title 24 ECDC — Shoreline tree related code amendments may be applied to Chapter 20.75 ECDC — Subdivisions that would allow flexibility in Master Program, and Chapter 20.13 ECDC — Landscaping Requirements. subdivision design to encourage more tree retention as noted in the LID and Tree Retention topics. a Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 257