Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2021-03-09 City Council - Full Agenda-2805
o Agenda Edmonds City Council V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MARCH 9, 2021, 7:00 PM DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS, MEETINGS ARE HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING PLATFORM. TO JOIN, COMMENT, VIEW, OR LISTEN TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN ITS ENTIRETY, PASTE THE FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. IN ADDITION TO ZOOM, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. PRESENTATION 5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2021 Edmonds City Council Agenda March 9, 2021 Page 1 2. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 8. NEW BUSINESS 1. Youth Commission Presentation - Pronouns (15 min) 2. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Public Process (30 min) 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Analysis of Direct Hire vs. Contracted Social Worker (30 min) 2. Amendments to New Tree Regulations (30 min) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN 12. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Edmonds City Council Agenda March 9, 2021 Page 2 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2021 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 03-02-2021 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 3 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING DRAFT MINUTES March 2, 2021 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Susan Paine, Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Brook Roberts, Student Representative 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir Shane Hope, Development Services Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Mgr. Dave Turley, Finance Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Distelhorst read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely. 4. PRESENTATION 1. PROCLAMATION HONORING MARY LOU BLOCK Mayor Nelson read a proclamation honoring Mary Lou Block and acknowledging that her contributions to the City of Edmonds will be missed. Councilmember K. Johnson shared that her last memory of Mary Lou was sitting on park bench overlooking Marina Beach; they had just completed a tour of the entire Edmonds waterfront that was Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 7.1.a organized by Val Stewart and led by Bill Phillips and included his activities on the Planning Board, Mary Lou's activities as Planning Director and Mr. Cook from Edmonds-Woodway High School. The tour of the waterfront provided a history lesson of everything on the waterfront from Brackett's Landing to the Marsh and beyond, a wonderful day for all of them. Mary Lou Block's husband, Peter Block, accepted the proclamation. He thanked Mayor Nelson, the City Council, the Port Commission and friends and coworkers in attendance for honoring Mary Lou with the proclamation and her many contributions to the City, County and Port. She would have been so pleased and proud to receive this recognition as she greatly valued her work in public service. He commented there was never a day when she did not look forward to going to work and she treasured the many relationships she developed over the years through her service. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. Marjie Fields, Edmonds, commented Perrinville flooding has been so severe that the City stormwater engineers were unable to control it, , salmon are unable to access Perrinville Creek, and moving the streambed is considered an option. This tragedy in the Perrinville Watershed proves the area is in crisis and adds greater urgency of the issue of development of the land above the creek known as Perrinville Woods. It is imperative that Perrinville Woods be left to do its work of absorbing rainwater. The City must find a way to keep those trees and as many others as possible. The destruction of Perrinville Creek demonstrates the necessity of creating a tree code that will actually preserve trees needed for stormwater absorption throughout the City. The Perrinville Watershed problem and the dramatic loss of tree canopy citywide are the result of decades of shortsighted development. Now the City Council and Mayor are faced with the job of figuring out how to clean up the mess. Fortunately, the City has dedicated elected officials who care deeply about the environment. To start with, the citizens are counting on them for an effective tree code. Gregg Schwab, Assistant Superintendent, Edmonds School District, provided an update on reentry plans to bring back K-2 and special education students beginning March 22nd. Fall sports are also underway with the first round of contests this week. Students in grades 3-12 will be brought back in smaller groups beginning on March 29th. There is a capital levy on the upcoming ballot; to the question of how can the District have a capital levy going to voters in less than two months while dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, he said how can the District not continue to move forward with a 2021 capital levy. Harmony Weinberg, Communications Manager, Edmonds School District, explained the 2021 capital levy needs to go to voters next month because the District's capital needs are critical. The need to preserve schools does not go away just because not all students are back in person yet. Students will be back and the buildings need to be ready for them. Ballots are due April 27th and will be mailed around April 8th. More information about specifics regarding the capital levy and information about the tax rate, which would remain a steady education tax rate if successful, is available on the District's website. She offered to return to the Council to provide more details on the levy. She summarized four reasons for the capital levy, 1) preserving buildings by making necessary repairs, 2) safety, security and accessibility improvements are necessary, 3) addressing capacity issues; many Edmonds schools are over capacity and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 2 Packet Pg. 5 the population will continue to grow, elementary schools are currently at 107% capacity, and 4) replacing two very old schools, Spruce and Oak Heights Elementary Schools. (Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 23, 2021 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS, WIRE PAYMENTS AND PAYROLL CHECKS 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM NATHANIEL COOK 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH IIBB FOR DESIGN OF THE GATEWAY SIGNS AS PART OF THE HWY 99 REVITALIZATION & GATEWAY PROJECT 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 2021 CARRYFORWARD BUDGET AMENDMENT Finance Director Dave Turley explained there are 31 requests; detailed decision packages are contained in the Council packet, including three he will present tonight as they. He reviewed three new decision packages that were added late and were not discussed during the Finance Committee meeting: • Mayor Nelson's proposal to add $25,000 to this year's Development Services budget for a study to assess the City's current tree canopy coverage • Reauthorize Crime Prevention Officer related cost center (frozen in the 2021 budget) • Reauthorize PD Police Officer First Class (frozen in the 2021 budget) Mr. Turley commented the Police Department currently has seven vacancies; the request to reauthorize these positions is necessary now to allow recruitment to begin. With the exception of the tree canopy study, the remaining items have been previously approved by full Council. The first 28 decision packages were reviewed and approved at the February 9th Finance Committee. The overall effect would be to increase beginning fund balance by $3,256,000, increase revenue by $4,272,000, increase expense by $6,554,000 and decrease ending fund balance by $25,000 for the tree canopy assessment. He recommended approving the ordinance in the packet amending Ordinance No. 4211 as a result of unanticipated transfers and expenditures of various funds and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the City's funding of an SRO officer was not deleted from the budget because it was being used for another purpose. She asked if the proposed budget amendment would delete the SRO and create another crime prevention position. Mr. Turley relayed the Edmonds School District decided a couple years ago they did not want the SRO so the Police Department repurposed it to a different position, possibly the crime prevention officer. Both these positions and all the other positions in the budget were approved 18 months ago in December 2019 and included in the 2020 budget. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 3 Packet Pg. 6 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the SRO was still in the 2020 budget even with the addition of a crime prevention officer. Mr. Turley answered the SRO position was repurposed to something else so there is not an SRO in the budget. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what the position was repurposed to. Mr. Turley did not recall and Mayor Nelson said there was no one present tonight from the Police Department to answer that questions. Councilmember K. Johnson commented there was one omission. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO CARRY FORWARD $10,000 FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ALLOCATION FOR INTERNS TO DO AN EXTENSIVE STUDY OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Councilmember K. Johnson explained this was previously approved in the budget but due to difficulties in the Planning Department and COVID, the positions were not filled. Carrying forward the funds would be a placeholder and could be used to hire interns this summer or next. She summarized this was not adding anything new to the budget, it had already been approved. She relayed Development Services Director Shane Hope's comment that it was an oversight. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what the $10,000 would pay for, commenting interns generally did not cost $10,000. She would not support it without an understanding of how the $10,000 would be used. Ms. Hope said the $10,000 amount was identified previously and she did not recall the exact plan for how it would be spent. She recalled there would need to be at least two interns and their work would take a period of time. While interns do not cost as much as staff, obtaining interns with the right background does require some money. That amount was identified to allow them to do a detailed study, compile information in a professional manner and make a presentation. Councilmember Olson commented the prioritization of historic elements in downtown Edmonds was one of her priorities and was reinforced during doorbelling, specifically the movie theater which Councilmember K. Johnson and she have been in conversation with the owners about. She was excited about this carry forward and joined the past Council in supporting it. She also supported paying the interns, commenting only the wealthiest students can afford to do unpaid internships so this would open it to all. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to Councilmember K. Johnson's comment that this would be a placeholder and that not including it as a carryforward was an oversight. Given the current situation, she asked if it was feasible to do this now or was that why it was a placeholder. Ms. Hope answered the intent had been to start early in 2020 but COVID changed the focus and it was put on the back burner. Life got so busy that staff did not think about again until Councilmember K. Johnson brought up again. The question is whether to include it in the budget as a placeholder so later in the year when students can be hired the project could begin. Council President Paine asked for clarification that this amount was approved in 2019 for the 2020 budget. Ms. Hope agreed it was. Councilmember Distelhorst asked about the cost center. Mr. Turley said it was in last year's budget so it will be carried forward exactly the same. If this item is approved, he recommended the motion state "as amended." AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 4 Packet Pg. 7 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis requested Mr. Williams address the budget amendment related to the gasification project, such as what is going on with the amendment and how that wonderful project is progressing. Public Works Director Phil Williams said the most notable thing about this budget amendment is it is very large; the reason it exists is when the budget was being developed in mid-2019 for 2020, it was anticipated the carbon recovery project would be in construction toward the end of 2020 and would have spent money rapidly. That did not happen so the spending authority needs be to carried over into 2021. Nothing has changed related to the cost of the project; it is still a $26,121,040 project. This is simply an accounting adjustment related to when the funds will be spent. Councilmember Buckshnis asked him to address how things in general were progressing with COVID and if there were any additional expenditures. Mr. Williams said with regard to COVID, the department has gotten by surprisingly well during the past 12 months. Employees worked split shifts March to May but since then were able to get all the PPE and protocols in place to do all their work. It has been a strain but not a financial burden on the department. Some expenses have been reimbursed by CARES Act funding but not a major amount. CARES Act funds were used for additional janitorial services that were required as well as to support LEAP that Parks is operating in the Frances Anderson Center which required a full-time temporary custodian. COVID has not had a major impact on the underlying budget. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS WITH THE ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT. At Councilmember Distelhorst's suggestion to include the ordinance verbiage, Councilmember Buckshnis restated the motion: TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4211 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. 2020 YEAR END FINANCE PRESENTATION Finance Director Dave Turley reviewed: • Diagram of 32 City funds (propriety funds [5] and governmental funds [27]) • 2021 Expenditure budgets by fund type (in millions of dollars) General Fund $46.11 Sewer Fund $35.63 Water Fund $10.58 Special Revenue Funds $9.04 Storm Fund $6.85 Capital Projects Funds $5.36 Debt Service Fund $2.75 Internal Service Funds $2.54 • 2020 Sales Tax Revenues Sales Tax Receipted Budgeted Actual Over(Under) Actual as a in For sales made in Collections Collections Budget Percentage of budget January 2020 November 2019 $635,000 $692,248 $57,248 109% February 2020 December 2019 800,000 847,349 47,349 106% March 2020 January 2020 595,000 648,279 53,279 109% April 2020 February 2020 565,000 503,725 61,275 89% May 2020 March 2020 730,000 500,196 229,804 69% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 5 Packet Pg. 8 7.1.a June 2020 Aril 2020 666,000 570,127 95,873 86% July 2020 May 2020 707,000 688,334 18,666 97% August 2020 June 2020 785,000 734,031 50,969 94% Sept 2020 July 2020 730,000 736,091 6,091 101% October 2020 August 2020 748,000 799,304 51,304 107% November 2020 Sept 2020 789,000 803,547 14,547 102% December 2020 October 2020 700,000 793,815 93,815 113% $8,450,000 $8,317,046 $(132,954) 98% • Graph of 2020 Sales Tax Receipts, Projected v Actual • Graph of Sales Tax Revenues Year over Year and Quarter over Quarter by category • Sales Tax Revenues Year over Year and Quarter over Quarter by category Year over Year Quarter over quarter Retail Automotive -2% +13% Misc Retail +16% +25% Construction Trade -7% +19% Business Services +8% +16% Eating & Drinking -21% -16% All other -2% +4% • Pie chart of 2021 General Fund Expenditure Budgets (from largest to smallest) o Police Department o Fire District Contract o Parks & Rec o Development Services o Engineering o Facilities Maintenance o City Attorney, Prosecutor, Public Defender o Comm. Srvs/Econ. Devel. o Municipal Court o Mayor's Office & HR o Finance o Prisoner Care o Other o Transfers to Other Funds o City Clerk o Public Works Admin. o City Council • Undated General Fund Results for 2020 (Dreliminarv) Amended Budget Actual Results % Total Revenues $44,055,157 $41,660,318 95% Revenue Under Budget -5.4% Total Expenses $49,365,292 $44,014,931 89% Expenses Under Budget -10.8% Revenues minus expenses $ 5,310,135 $ 2,354,613 Beginning Fund Balance $15,552,187 $15,552,187 Ending Fund Balance 10,242,052 13,197,574 • Fund Balance in the General Fund o Reserved and unreserved o General Fund Operating Reserve = 16% of GF Operating Adopted Expenditure Budget (in millions of dollars) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 6 Packet Pg. 9 General Fund & Subfunds GF Operating Reserve Civic Field Dec 2019 $9.33 $7.72 $2.00 Sept 2020 $5.24 $7.72 $2.00 Dec 2020 $7.04 $7.72 $2.00 Further financial information about the City of Edmonds, presentations are given in Finance Committee each month, and recordings of all Council meetings and Committee meetings are available on the City website at http://edmondswa.igm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx PDF copies of the monthly and quarterly reports are also available on the City website at http://www.edmondswa.gov/financial-reports.htH Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the fire contract was settled in 2020 or 2021. Mr. Turley said the payment was made in December 2020 so it was reflected in 2020 expenses. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Mr. Turley recommending that it not be included in the 2021 budget and he was right. 3. DRAFT TREE REGULATIONS AND SUBDIVISION CODE AMENDMENT Development Services Director Shane Hope commented as the City Council and Planning Board, who have met regarding this many times, know this set of tree regulations are not the total sum of what tree regulations may be in the future but represent an important first step. This is being presented tonight as the first stage of the tree regulations, particularly related to development. The presentation will also include a review and opportunity for input on the timeline for Stage 2. She recommended the Council adopt the ordinance with any amendments and then move forward with Stage 2. Environmental Project Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: • Recommendation o Staged Review of Tree Regulations ■ Stage 1 - Updated Draft Tree Regulations ■ Stage 2 - Provide direction on next round of tree regulations and programs • Stage 1 Updated Draft Tree Regulations o Updated regulations in Attachment 1 ■ Added definition for canopy ■ Added additional parameters for maintenance of previously topped trees ■ Tree plan must show trees on adjacent property where tree canopies extend onto project site ■ Development sites that lack significant trees are required to plant so there are at least 3 trees per 8,000 square feet of lot area ■ Minor housekeeping and corrections Stage 1 Ordinance o Adopting this ordinance is intended to establish the initial round of new tree regulations primarily related to development: ■ Strengthen tree retention and protection as development occurs; ■ Set priorities for tree retention; ■ Strengthen tree replacement requirements; ■ Establish a fee -in -lieu replacement program; ■ Clarify permitting exemption for single-family properties; ■ Establish a tree fund allowable uses for it; ■ Strengthen civil penalties for tree violations; and ■ Provide opportunity for conservation o This is a strong start, does not address all the goals in the UFMP, more goals addressed more in Stage 2 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 7 Packet Pg. 10 7.1.a Ms. Hope reviewed • Stage 2 Upcoming Tree Related Items Item Timing Inventory of downtown Streets Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Inventory of other public trees 2022 or TBD Street Tree Plan update Q2 2021-Q4 20221 Tree canopy assessment Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Heritage Tree Program 32021- 4 2021 Tree Canopy Goal Q3 2021 Assessment of staffing and other resource needs Q2 2021 -2022 or TBD Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Exploration of other incentive programs 2022 or TBD Open sace acquisition Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Tree retention on private property (not related to development) Q4 2021 Partnerships with other organizations Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Annual reports on City tree activities Q2 2021 Treegive-away program 2022 or TBD View corridors 2022 or TBD Wildlife & habitat corridors Q3 2021-Q4 2021 Expanded public education & Information Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Stormwater & watershed Analysis Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Other tree -related issues 2022 or TBD Mayor Nelson advised Council questions would be taken in a round robin format with Councilmembers asking one question during their turn. As the first two Councilmembers did not have any questions, Councilmember Buckshnis suggested returning to questions by request after one round of round robin. Mayor Nelson agreed. Councilmember L. Johnson referenced the outline for the future, specifically tree retention on private property, recalling during discussions a couple weeks ago, Ms. Hope anticipated the additional parts of code could be completed six months. However, from the list of items in Stage 2, it appears the quarter she anticipated work on the topic would end is now when that would begin. Ms. Hope answered it depends on how long the Council takes on each item. The list illustrates a conservative view, the dates shown are when the items would come to Council. Councilmember K. Johnson observed the Council has not yet had a discussion about the broader issues. She suggested taking them one by one and reaching a consensus before editing the proposed regulations. For example, there is a lot of concern about conserving native species, protecting views, and impacts on the watershed due to development. Councilmember Olson referred to tree retention on private property and view issues and suggested taking those together because views are not just for homeowners, but residents and visitors who want to see the water. It is a balancing act and to the extent you cannot have it all due to climate and environmental pressures, the scale is tipped to tree protection. Taking those two issues in silos would not work for the ultimate objective to find the right balance for all the priorities. Ms. Hope commented one of ways staff looks at it is views themselves are part of the thinking related to tree retention on private property. View corridors may be a more specialized topic related to City streets, etc. Councilmember Olson relayed her understanding that view corridors would be a separate issue but the view issue related to private property would have a different timeline. Ms. Hope agreed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 8 Packet Pg. 11 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the issues cannot be considered in silos; issues include housing, stormwater, and trees that are being cut down and not replaced with native or trees with like diameters. She commented a tree with a 12 inch diameter is 60 years old. The Council received a letter from Mr. Farmen stating 57 trees were cut to build a 4,000 square foot home. She suggested determining in the timeline how to include housing codes such as low impact housing development that addresses retaining trees and zero lot lines as well as view versus non -view. She believed the City should mail the small tree brochure to all the residents in the bowl to assure people the intent is not to put big trees in the bowl or view areas. She agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson about having a discussion about the overarching global aspect and the Council's intent regarding how to retain and enhance the tree canopy. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out the City of Edmonds does not have regulations that protect views. Ms. Hope agreed. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the only place she was aware that had such regulations was Innis Arden. Ms. Hope said that was a notable one although there may be others, but it was not a common thing. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she wanted to be sure people were clear the City's codes do not protect views. Council President Paine appreciated the desire to have a broader discussion, but what is before the Council is the conservation subdivision design flexibility tree code. Those broader discussions will bring in the desires within the proposed code and she wanted those discussions to occur during code amendments. This is at least the third time the Council has seen the draft codes as well as presentations and discussions at the Planning Board. There is some pressure related to approval of this ordinance as the building moratorium ends on March 10'1i so the Council has tonight and the March 9tn meeting to get through this. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to Section 23.10.040 Exemptions, commenting it does not require a permit, but exempts removal of trees on single family lots except if within a critical area. However, Section 23.10.060 Tree Retention Associated with Development Activity, refers to retention of trees for new single family development on a vacant lot or demolition and replacement of a single family house. She asked if the intent was to exempt single family homes from the tree regulations. Ms. Hope answered the proposal in Stage 1 is to deal with it at the development stage, require retention or planting of trees at the development state, to maintain the existing exemption for non -developing single family properties, but put that on the list of topics for Stage 2. That will be a very complex issue such as permitting requirements, notification requirements, criteria, and resources to implement and provide education to the public and property owners. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if was the intent to apply the regulations to single family lots that were being developed or redeveloped. Ms. Hope answered yes. Councilmember L. Johnson made the following motion, recognizing there were time constraints and to facilitate discussion of amendments: COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING EXISTING TREE CUTTING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING NEW TREE RELATED REGULATIONS, NEW CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN REGULATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW TREE FUND. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND 23.10.000 INTENT AND PURPOSES, BY ADDING A NEW C "PRESERVE, THROUGH DESIGN AND INTENTION WILDLIFE CORRIDORS AND HABITAT." Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 9 Packet Pg. 12 Councilmember Olson asked for clarification of the definition of intention in this statement. Council President Paine answered it is to affirmatively address the preservation of wildlife corridors and habitat, look at that as a meaningful element during design review for each project. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if that was addressed within the packet. Council President Paine answered no. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said her question was to Ms. Hope. Ms. Hope said wildlife corridors and habitat are addressed in critical area ordinances and there may be a reference in the regulations. She said Council President Paine may be interested in ensuring that was also stated in the intent statement. Mr. Lien said most wildlife habitat corridors are along stream channels which are protected by the critical area code and the critical areas code is referenced several times in this code. One of the things that could be done during Stage 2 with regard to wildlife habitat corridors although it may not be regulatory, would be to improve the quality of habitat corridors by partnering with groups such as Adopt a Stream and Students Saving Salmon as well as stormwater crews who often come in contact with property owners. There are regulations related to wildlife corridors in the critical area code but education, outreach and partnership with other organizations will help improve the quality of corridors. Much of the City was developed before critical area regulations, SEPA, etc. and although there are buffers established in the CAO, they often do not exist on the ground. Improving the habitat corridors will be incorporated into Stage 2 regulations. Mr. Lien offered to display Word version of the code (Attachment 1) to illustrate amendments. Councilmembers agreed that would be helpful. Councilmember Distelhorst asked about the definitions of preservation and habitat and how would this amendment be implemented. Ms. Hope said typically the purpose statement did not get into the regulatory detail. The regulatory detail will state how it will be implemented and it did not necessarily need to be identified or defined separately. Councilmember Olson asked staff s thoughts about addressing this in the critical area ordinance or including in the intent. Ms. Hope said she did not see it as necessary, but it was not harmful. Wildlife corridors and habitat are an important issue, but that will be spelled out in more detail in the tree retention scheme and will be handled in a greater extent in the critical area regulations which govern wildlife corridors and habitat in quite a lot of detail. She summarized it would not hurt to include the language but its inclusion in the intent statement did not necessarily change things. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.000 INTENT AND PURPOSE TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS A NEW SUBSECTION C. "IMPLEMENT THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY'S CLIMATE ACTION PLAN." Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City did not have a Climate Action Plan (CAP) and she was unsure this was relevant until the CAP was approved by the City Council. Councilmember Olson commented knowing there is a CAP now and the Council would not be revisiting the code once the new CAP is approved, she favored including this amendment. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 10 Packet Pg. 13 7.1.a COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO AMEND TO ADD TO THE DEFINITIONS SECTION A DEFINITION FOR NATIVE TREES THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE ITEMS IDENTIFIED ON PAGE 303 OF THE PACKET AND LISTED IN APPENDIX F AND WOULD INCLUDE BOTH BROADLEAF TREES AND CONIFERS SUCH AS BIG LEAF MAPLE AND DOUGLAS FIR. Councilmember K. Johnson commented there has been a lot of discussion about maintaining native trees, but it is not defined or spelled out in the code, an oversight that needs to be corrected. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Lien said that was not really a definition as the only specificity was bigleaf maple and Douglas fir and there are many other native trees. Native trees are currently mentioned in the code and the critical area code states replacement trees need to be native and indigenous; many trees are native to the region but not necessarily indigenous to Edmonds. He would need some time to draft a definition of native trees and could not have it ready for the ordinance tonight. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to packet page 303, which Mr. Lien said was from the UFMP. Councilmember K. Johnson said that page includes a description of native trees and a list of common ones and states a more comprehensive list can be found in Appendix F. Ms. Hope supposed there could be a definition that refers to the UFMP as identified on page X and in Appendix F. Ms. Hope agreed it was difficult to make complicated amendments on the fly; if that was an acceptable approach and it was later determine that was not working, it could be amended. Councilmember K. Johnson said that that was her initial suggestion; she wanted to refer to the UFMP's definition of native trees. She commented if trees were not growing in Edmonds, they would not be indigenous to a certain extent. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO AMEND TO REVISE FORMER SUBSECTION C WHICH IS NOW SUBSECTION D AS FOLLOWS "TO PROMOTE PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY BIODIVERSITY, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF EDMONDS, AND PROVIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS MITIGATION BY PRESERVING...". Councilmember Olson suggested replacing "by" with "and," change "preserving" to "preserve," and remove "and" prior to "provide." Councilmember L. Johnson accepted that friendly amendment. Mayor Nelson restated the motion: REVISE SUBSECTION D TO READ, "TO PROMOTE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, BIODIVERSITY, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF EDMONDS, AND PROVIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS MITIGATIONRV AND PRESERVEING... " AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Buckshnis said a lot of people do not believe hazard and nuisance need to be defined separately. She suggested changing the definition of hazard trees to "a si ni scant tree that is dead, dying, damaged..." and deleting the definition of nuisance tree because a hazard tree is a nuisance tree and a nuisance tree is a hazard tree. Mr. Lien said he had seen another amendment that would make a hazard tree and a nuisance tree the same. By only adding "significant," there is still a difference between a nuisance and a hazard tree. He referred to the definition of a hazard tree, "A tree that is dead, dying, diseased, damaged, or structurally defective tree." A nuisance tree may be a big, perfectly healthy tree but Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 11 Packet Pg. 14 7.1.a it is buckling a driveway, clogging a sewer line, or close to a house but is not in danger of falling. That is the reason a distinction was made between a hazard tree and a nuisance tree. Councilmember Buckshnis commented they are both hazards. Regardless of the tree, if it is buckling a driveway, it is a hazard. She clarified a healthy tree that was causing a hazard was a hazard tree not a nuisance tree. Mr. Lien said the definition could be amended to cover both. The way the definitions are now, if nuisance was deleted, the current definition of hazard tree would not cover a nuisance tree. Ms. Hope recalled an amendment that was submitted that could cover both added, "or causing significant physical damage to a private or public structure, sidewalk, curb, road, water, sewer or stormwater utilities, driveway or parking lot." Councilmember Buckshnis commented some hazard or nuisance trees are good for the environment because they can be used for snags. Perhaps that could be a reason to differentiate the definition because a nuisance tree is a hazard and a hazard tree may not be nuisance but could be kept for snag purposes. Mr. Lien said there are hazard tree regulations in critical areas that encourage creation of wildlife snags rather than removal because if a snag fell, it would not cause damage, but would provide some habitat. That would not fit in the definition of a hazard or nuisance tree. City Attorney Jeff Taraday pointed out there are different decision criteria for hazard trees and nuisance trees. Unless the decision criteria was changed in 23.10.040.17, there needs to be different definitions. The type of documentation the code asks for is different for nuisance trees and hazard trees. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND TO ADD "SIGNIFICANT" TO THE HAZARD TREE DEFINITION. Council President Paine said a significant tree is 6" DBH. Councilmember Distelhorst asked if there were times a hazard tree was not 6" but rather 4" and then would not qualify as a hazard tree. Mr. Lien answered a tree smaller than 6" could be hazard tree but that was much easier to remedy than a larger tree. These regulations are tied to the cutting and removal of significant trees. If a tree is not a significant tree, it is not subject to these regulations provided it is outside a critical area. If a tree is a hazard tree but is not a significant tree and there are no critical areas, it could be removed. The regulations apply once the 6" threshold is met. Councilmember Distelhorst observed the proposed amendment would not have any change to implementation. Councilmember Olson asked how the amendment adds value to the definition. If a tree is smaller and it is a hazard, it may not be restricted from removal, it may be a greater hazard if it were bigger. A tall skinny tree that could fall on a car is still a hazard tree. She prefer not to approve the amendment and said the fewer words to get the point across, the better. If the Council is iffy on something, she preferred to err on leaving it out. Councilmember Buckshnis said a hazard tree is a tree that is dead, dying, diseased, damaged, structurally defective or exposed by recent removal of adjacent trees. She wanted to add "significant" because younger trees are typically not dead, dying, diseased, damaged, etc. Mr. Lien said there may be a tree that is not a significant tree (less than 6") but is considered a protected tree by this code. A protected tree is "A tree identified for retention and protection on an approved tree retention plan, replacement in relation to a permit or plan, and/or permanently protected by easement, tract, or covenant restriction." These are trees that are required to be retained or planted through development. It may not be 6" but has specific protection requirements including a protected tree covenant that's recorded on property. Including only "tree" in the definition instead of "significant tree" would cover both a significant and a protected tree. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 12 Packet Pg. 15 7.1.a Council President Paine asked if the hazard tree definition followed the tree assessment tool used by the ISA. Mr. Lien answered removal of a hazard tree outside a critical area requires a tree risk assessment form completed by an arborist. There are times that is not required such as if there is a large, obviously dead tree next to a house. The tree risk assessment form is required for a live tree. Councilmember Olson asked for additional clarification. Mr. Lien explained there is a different category of trees created by this code, a protected tree. It may/may not meet the definition of a significant tree. Not including "significant" in the definition of hazard tree would cover both significant and protected trees. Adding "significant" limits it to a tree 6"+ DBH. Mr. Taraday commented adding "significant" to the definition could make it difficult to remove a protected tree that has become a hazard as it is smaller than 6". Councilmember Olson asked if that would be a bad thing. Mr. Taraday said it could be a bad thing; he assumed the City wanted to make it easy to remove hazardous trees. Councilmember Buckshnis said the tree code is about significant or bigger trees. She asked if a permit was required for a hazardous significant tree or could a hazard tree of any size be cut. Mr. Lien answered documentation is required, not a permit. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if documentation was only required for significant trees. Mr. Lien answered alteration of a critical area required critical area review and there are specific requirements in the critical area code related to hazard trees. Outside critical areas, this code would address a hazard tree. Councilmember Buckshnis said this code is dealing with big trees. Councilmember L. Johnson said it was shortsighted to consider only big trees, big trees started small so the code is about all trees and what they will eventually be. While there is additional emphasis on protecting large trees that cannot be replaced in our lifetime, there is also emphasis on what can be done within our lifetime to benefit future generations. She wanted to ensure that fuller picture was kept in mind. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to a tree in Yost Park by the pool that was cut down because it was hazardous, but the first 15 feet were retained and provided a lot of insects for birds, etc. She asked if consideration had been given to retaining the trunks of trees for that purpose, observing it may not be attractive on single family property. Mr. Lien said the critical area code does specifically address that; rather than removing a tree it should be turned into a wildlife snag. Ms. Hope said the challenge would be requiring all hazardous trees to become snags such as on a small single family property. That is encouraged and will be part of the public outreach. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (1-5-1), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO; AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. Councilmember Olson referred to Section 23.10.020 definitions, N.2, pointing out the second "track" should be "TRAQ." Mr. Taraday said that could be handled as a scrivener's error. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.060.A INTRODUCTION. "...THE CITY REQUIRES APPROVAL OF A TREE RETENTION AND PROTECTION PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH..." Mr. Lien said tree retention plan is mentioned at least 13 other places in the code; therefore if this change is approved it would need to be changed throughout the code. Council President Paine recommended the change be made throughout the code wherever it makes grammatical and useful sense. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 13 Packet Pg. 16 Councilmember Olson asked what Council President Paine saw as the value of that amendment and whether the plan offers any tree protection. Council President Paine said tree protection plans often include the perimeter around the trees that is protected during development, an area where trucks, equipment or storage will not occur in the critical root zone and the tree protection zone is clearly identified on the plan. A tree can be retained, but if the critical root zone is not also protected, tree could be protection would be for naught. Ms. Hope said the idea of protection is included in the plan. The amendment would make it clear that that protection is included. Council President Paine agreed that was her intent. Mr. Lien referred to a section that describes the protection measures for trees during development. Council President Paine said that was done beautifully. Ms. Hope said if the Council approves this amendment, it will be amended in all the appropriate places in the code. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.060.B.2.II TO READ, "ACCURATE LOCATION OF SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES WHERE THE CANOPY AND/OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF ADJACENT SIGNIFICANT TREES EXTEND ONTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY..." AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.040.E, BY REMOVING, "PROVIDED PRUNING WILL BE UNDERTAKEN ONLY TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND TREE HEALTH." Councilmember Olson explained when a tree topped inherently the regrowth is weak and can present a hazard for people, animals, or dwellings underneath at the wrong time, especially in wind or post storm when trees are further weakened. A requirement like this asks the homeowner to show compliance that it meets the standard which is an expense and a burden. Topping is a bad practice that creates weakened regrowth; this is not good code and she recommended not including that language. Mr. Lien asked if she was referring to the pruning of previously topped trees or only the language, "providing pruning will be undertaken only to the extend necessary for public safety and tree health." Councilmember Olson said she wanted the added language removed. Councilmember L. Johnson spoke against the motion, referring to the statement "Pruning existing trees back to the point where they have been previously topped is considered maintenance for these trees alone," commenting that is leading the person with that type of tree to believe they have to prune them back to where they were previously topped. She appreciated that once a limb was cut, it was gone forever and restoring improperly pruned trees can take years and in some cases a tree that is improperly pruned or topped could be lost forever and cannot to be restored properly. Earlier in that section, there is language that refers to ANSI A300 (Part 9), Tree Risk Assessment, describes how to restore a tree that has been severely damaged through vandalism, storm damage or over pruning or topping. She did not want to lead people to think that a tree has to be re -topped for safety. It may need to be, but whether that is necessary should be assessed Councilmember K. Johnson said there have been times when the Council has been faced with improperly topped trees when the homeowners or HOA topped the trees to protect their views and have been fined. However, once the trees have been topped, they have to be re -topped again and again which is essentially rewarding them for maintaining their views. The City should have a replacement program; if someone illegally tops a tree that is not terrifically mature, perhaps it should be replaced rather than continuously re -topped. Mr. Lien said if someone illegally topped a tree, they would subject to the violation provisions Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 14 Packet Pg. 17 7.1.a of the code which potentially include replacement. This section is related to routine landscaping; numerous trees throughout the City have been topped over and over and it becomes a safety issue. For single stem trees such as a Douglas fir, it is not possible to rebuild the crown after it has been topped. The branches have weak connections and create a safety hazard. If a permit were required for the initial tree topping, the topping would fall under violations and could require replacement. This section is related to tree previously topped which can be topped to the previously topped level primarily for safety reasons. Councilmember K. Johnson commented there are many trees along the electric/communication lines that the utility companies top regardless of the species. Councilmember Olson clarified how that section was written before that language was added it was considered maintenance and not a requirement that the City insists be done which appeared to be Councilmember L. Johnson's assertion. Assessments cost money and citizens should not be required to have an assessment when by nature that regrowth is inherently dangerous. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if the wording could be amended so that it did not lead a property owner to assume a tree needed to be topped at the level it was previously topped. She understood that topping a Douglas fir to the previously topped level was appropriate but there are many other trees. The ANSI A300 (Part 9) clearly states that a number of trees can be restored to a previous canopy. She wanted to ensure that people were not led to the assumption that all previously topped trees had to be re -topped. Councilmember Distelhorst suggested changing the language from "for public safety and tree health" to "for public safety or tree health." Ms. Hope agreed, noting there is reference to the ANSI A300. Mr. Lien referred to Section 23.10.040.F, pointing out subsections a-c do not require any supporting documentation and is allowed by the code. If documentation is required to look at previously topped trees to ensure it is being maintained as necessary for public safety and/or tree health, perhaps the previous topped trees section should be moved to F and there needs to be documentation. Councilmember Olson said that was one of her points; some of these trees have been topped for decades and the current homeowner may not have been responsible for topping the trees in the first place so that burden should not be added. This is related to finding the balance between views and taking care of environment; this is not a total plus for the environment and is a potential hazard. It may have been done at one point for view purposes, but where it has been done in the past, she did not see the value of making it a thing. Council President Paine agreed "or" would provide some flexibility to allow a homeowner to continue to top a previously topped tree or for a new homeowner to allow a tree to regain its crown. It was her understanding that the prior tree code allowed a topped tree to be maintained. Ms. Hope agreed. Mr. Lien pointed out there is similar language in the critical area code but not in the tree code. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not like any of the exemption and agreed with Councilmember L. Johnson. The goal is to educate the public that trees are not bad. With regard to power companies that trim trees along the power lines, she relayed her neighbors were given the option of having the trees cut lower and they didn't just because they hoped to regrow the trees even though it had been previously topped. She questioned how this would be implemented or policed. Councilmember L. Johnson said she did not intent that it would be policed, she just wanted it for clarification so people did not assume that trees had to be re -topped. She agreed with Councilmember Distelhorst's suggestion to change "and" to "or" as it added additional clarity. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 15 Packet Pg. 18 Councilmember Olson said her amendment was to remove the language following "alone." One of the goals is to turn everybody into tree loves and this provision will have the exact opposite effect. Councilmember K. Johnson said this section does not appear to require pruning be done, just that if tree had been topped, they could only be prune back as necessary for public safety and tree health. The responsibility is on the landowner who topped the tree to begin with. She did not support removing that language as it was the responsibility of the homeowner, whether or not they were the person who originally topped the tree. Councilmember Olson said there was nothing that says it has to be maintained even if that language was removed. By leaving it in, people can prune at that level and if someone questions it, they can simply say they did it for public safety and health. It is much cleaner without that language and removing it still does not require people to maintain the topped tree height; it simply says it is considered maintenance. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON CALLED THE QUESTION. VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, BUCKSHNIS, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.040 BY REPLACING "SAFETY AND TREE HEALTH" WITH "SAFETY OR TREE HEALTH." AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO AMEND SECTION 23.10.060.11.2.A.II, BY ADDING "AND TREE CROWN DIAMETER" FOLLOWING "SIZE (DBH)." Council President Paine said by adding "tree crown diameter" would show the size of the tree crown on the plans. Mr. Lien said there are no regulations related to tree crown diameter; although it would be shown on the plan, there are no regulations to address it. The regulations related to tree protection are the critical root zone which is based on the diameter of the tree. Councilmember K. Johnson said there is also reference to the drip line during construction. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Olson asked if the input from Mr. Lien was that tree crown diameter would be an additional burden for the contractor but would not add any value to the information it provides the City for the purposes of monitoring the construction project. Mr. Lien answered it would not inform the review of the proposal because there are no regulations related to that. Councilmember Olson concluded the addition would not provide any benefit. Mr. Lien answered not in reviewing the proposal. Councilmember L. Johnson said she seconded the motion hoping to gain further understanding regarding why to document the tree crown diameter with development. She understood documenting the roots and drip line but not tree crown diameter with relation to development. Council President Paine said she would like to have it added as it would help show interconnection between a grove of trees; showing the tree crown would demonstrate the canopy cover on the site or to adjacent canopy cover. Councilmember Distelhorst asked if that was something that a consultant would be qualified and able to provide. Mr. Lien was not certain what it would take to provide that information. Site plans show a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 19 canopy around the trees which he assumed was relative to the DBH size, but he doubted they actually measured the tree crown diameter. Surveyed locations of tree are not always required and he assumed the tree canopy diameter would be estimated. Councilmember Distelhorst relayed his understanding that it would be a best guess rather than a measurement. Mr. Lien displayed a site plan that illustrate tree locations with the DBH with some sort of canopy around it. He pointed out a 40" tree and the canopy, a smaller tree with a smaller canopy, an 18" tree with a slightly bigger canopy, and a grove of trees and their canopy. Site plans typically show a canopy but he assumed it was an estimate rather than measured. Councilmember Distelhorst observed that would be acceptable under Council President Paine's amendment. Mr. Lien said he would expect to see that but rather than estimated crown diameters it would be a little related to what was actual on the ground. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO ADD "ESTIMATED" PRIOR TO "TREE CROWN DIAMETER." COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE ACCEPTED THAT AS A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT. Councilmember K. Johnson said she will vote against the amendment for the simple reason that the tree crown for conifers is insignificant compared to the drip line which show the broadest part of the tree. Confers' more global shape is equivalent to the crown line of tree. She viewed this as an added step that developers did not need to provide as the current regulations were adequate. For trees more closely associated, the site plan illustrates protection for groups of trees. Mayor Nelson restated the motion: AMEND SECTION 23.10.060.B.2.A.II TO ADD "AND ESTIMATED TREE CROWN DIAMETER." UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND L. JOHNSON, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING NO. Council President Paine suggested continuing the discussion next week and moving on to the remaining agenda items. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. 9. NEW BUSINESS 1. ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING EMERGENCY INTERIM REGULATIONS RELATED TO LANDMARK TREES Development Services Director Shane Hope explained the packet contains an emergency interim ordinance for six months that can be revisited prior to six months. The intent of the ordinance is to apply not only to development but apply broadly to all private properties and prohibit the removal of trees greater than 24" diameter at breast height (DBH) during the interim period unless they are hazardous. The intent of the ordinance, proposed by Council President Paine and Councilmember L. Johnson and supported by Mayor Nelson, was to recognize the Council intends to revisit private property tree regulations. As that will take several months to complete, the emergency interim ordinance will preclude cutting of those trees during the interim period. Ms. Hope explained the ordinance also sets a public hearing date of April 20, 2021 to discuss continuing or changing the ordinance. If approved by a super majority, the ordinance could go into effect Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 20 7.1.a immediately upon adoption. She referenced Section 3 Prohibition, which states, "For as long as this ordinance remains in effect, it shall be unlawful to direct any act of tree removal toward a landmark tree." A landmark tree is defined as 24" DBH unless it meets the definition of a hazard tree or nuisance tree. Councilmember K. Johnson asked how the ordinance will be enforced. She recalled driving down the street recently and seeing that a row of trees had been removed from the backyard of a house and asked how that will be prevented. Ms. Hope agreed that was the most challenging issue with this prohibition. If a tree code is adopted in the future that applies to all properties, it will also raise issues related to review criteria, enforcement, etc. and will require extra resources. There are definitely fewer 24" DBH trees so it will not necessarily affect all the properties in the City. Enforcement would be via seeing it or someone reporting it. If the emergency interim ordinance is adopted, the City will try to get the word out but violators could be subject to penalties. Councilmember K. Johnson said she often hears chainsaws in her neighborhood and trees greater than 24" DBH being topped or cut down. She pointed out once you hear a chainsaw, it is too late as the tree is already being cut down and they usually start at the top and work their way down unless they are logging it for the wood. She suggested once this is adopted, sending a notification to the major tree companies so they know not to cut those trees in Edmonds without permission. Council President Paine said she was glad to have this emergency interim ordinance drafted that protects and preserves landmark trees which are the biggest. She was hopeful it would maintain the status quo and allow the subdivision tree code to be completed as well as put together the resources and planning for an effective urban forestry program, look at canopy data through the canopy study and develop a thoughtful tree code via an extensive public process like was done in 2015. The ordinance will provide that time and prevents impacts on the tree canopy. A lot of the tree canopy has been removed in the last couple years and it would be a shame to lose more. The ordinance will provide time for a more thoughtful tree code that covers all properties. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was excited about this, but it should not use a definition that is not in the code; she suggested rather than "landmark tree," using "significant tree", and instead of 24" DBH, using 12" DBH because a 12" DBH is 60 years old. She agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson's concerns and referred to an application for tree and vegetation removal that the applicant applied for after the fact to remove 2 hazard trees and 11 additional trees. She emphasized tree are being cut down and she preferred to err on the side of caution and use language already in the code. She concluded this is a great step and she applaud the Council for taking it. Councilmember L. Johnson thanked the Administration for hearing their concerns and for working with them to put this together. At the bare minimum, this will protect old growth trees that could never be replaced and grown to the size they are in our lifetime. This is the minimum that can be done; it is really important and should have been done a while ago to protect those trees. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Mayor Nelson, Council President Paine, Councilmember L. Johnson and the Administration for their work on this. He appreciate the landmark tree and the focus on the 24" DBH. He feared going down to 12" DBH would be more difficult and may be too broad a focus for an emergency ordinance. As with the moratorium, his preference is not to legislate via emergence ordinance and moratorium in general. He hoped having this in place for six months provided the time necessary for public outreach and a process by the Administration and whatever resources the Administration needed to complete that work and to work with residents to have a fuller code and ensure the Council did not continue to legislate via emergency ordinance and moratorium. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 21 7.1.a Councilmember Olson said her concern with things that arise on short order is the unanticipated consequences. She asked if this would apply to someone doing a renovation on their property or was that covered in another way related to the development aspect. She asked if there could be an exception or caveat that would allow a Council hearing for a tree that someone feels they need to address in the six month period and would provide some flexibility for things that may arise that the Council is not thinking about right now. Ms. Hope said the ordinance does not cover trees going through a permitted development process because that has different requirements. This is related to other areas where people are choosing to cut trees for various reasons. As written, the ordinance would apply to roughly 90% of properties in the City. Mr. Lien clarified it would not impact trees being removed with a reviewed development. This ordinance does not apply to any tree removal associated with a permit through a building permit, subdivision or other land use approval. It is intended to preserve large trees on developed single family properties while the other regulations are being developed. He concluded trees reviewed with a development proposal could still be removed. Council President Paine said she asked similar questions of Ms. Hope regarding a smaller tree diameter. The challenge is there is not enough code enforcement as well as seeking a balance between preserving large trees and hoping to have good compliance with the understanding the City is seeking greater tree canopy and the ability to monitor it. She had inquired about 12" or 16" DBH and was convinced the 24" DBH during the interim period would be more successful and not overstrain resources. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding that trees associated with a permit for a short plat or subdivision could be removed because the moratorium ends March 10`h. She expressed interest in extending the moratorium because she was uncertain the code would be approved by March 10`h. She concluded if a developer submitted a permit for a subdivision for a property with a lot of trees, they could be removed regardless of size after March 10`h when the moratorium expires. Mayor Nelson said the issue before the Council is the emergency interim ordinance, not the emergency moratorium. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out Mr. Lien's statement that this ordinance would not apply to tree removed as part of a subdivision. She asked whether subdivisions should be included in this emergency ordinance since the moratorium ends March 10`h. Mr. Lien answered the thought was that the regulations that the Council reviewed in the previous agenda item would be adopted; the new Section 23.10 referenced in the emergency ordinance has regulations that preserve trees with development. If that regulation is not adopted by the time the moratorium expires (Ordinances 4200 and 4201), the regulations would revert to the current tree code. This ordinance may need to be amended if it is adopted prior to the other ordinance because it specifically references Section 23.10. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained when the emergency interim ordinance was drafted, it was assumed the tree code would already be adopted and this would be next. Realizing the Council potentially wants to make more amendments to the tree, he proposed adopting the tree code tonight with the amendments that were made and come back next week and continue to make amendments. The result would be instead of making amendments to a draft code, the Council would be amending an already adopted code. That would address the concern about the moratorium expiring. He believed if the Council waited until next week, the moratorium would be expired at the time of next week's Council meeting. Council President Paine said as she understands the emergency moratorium, when the conservation subdivision code is adopted, the moratorium will expire. Ms. Hope answered yes, the way it is currently written. Mr. Taraday said there is a repealer section in Section 4 of the tree code ordinance that expressly repeals the tree moratorium because the new tree code goes into effect. An argument can be made [Mr. Taraday discontinued participation in the virtual meeting]. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 22 COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND FOR 15 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Buckshnis said Mr. Taraday and she have been discussing the fact that approving the tree code repeals Ordinances 4200 and 4201, the moratorium on subdivisions and short plats. If the Council approves the tree code as Mr. Taraday suggested, she has more amendments that she feels would solidify the tree code. She was leery of approving the tree code tonight. Ms. Hope said the tree ordinance in the packet specifically repeals the moratorium which otherwise would expire March I Oh. If the Council adopts tree regulations as amended, and comes back next week to make further amendments, that may be preferable to extending or creating a new moratorium. Mr. Taraday said there is language in Ordinance 4200 that tries to avoid this situation from occurring by stating something like the ordinance will not be presumed to have been repealed or expired but the Council will do that by ordinance. He was uncertain that language had been tested in court; it was included as a potential safety net. He would prefer not to rely on that language and would rather the Council not accidentally allow the moratorium to expire. Ms. Hope said by adopting the proposed tree regulations with the amendments approved tonight, the moratorium would be ended, but next week Council could consider making additional amendments to the adopted tree code. That would prevent the unintended expiration of the moratorium expiring or creating a new moratorium on the fly. Mr. Taraday agreed. Councilmember K. Johnson said the Council has gotten off subject. The issue before the Council is the emergency ordinance and the Council should make a decision on that before deciding on other things. Councilmember Buckshnis explained if the Council approves this emergency ordinance tonight, it refers to definitions in the tree code which haven't been approved. If the Council approves the tree code, it removes the moratorium. She asked if the Council could approve the tree code and remove Section 4. Mr. Taraday said Section 4 of the tree code ordinance could be removed. He did not want to represent to the Council that the moratorium was bulletproof and remained in effect by virtue of removing Section 4 because Ordinance 4200 specifically states it is a 4 month moratorium and the 4 months expire on March 10ffi. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE INTERIM EMERGENCY TREE ORDINANCE FOR LANDMARK TREES AND MOVE BACK TO DISCUSSING THE CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION CODE WITH THE AMENDMENTS MADE SO FAR AND COME BACK NEXT WEEK. Councilmember Distelhorst relayed his understanding that the emergency ordinance references code that does not yet exist until the Council adopts the tree ordinance which is why the tree ordnance needs to be adopted first. Mr. Taraday said the ordinances certainly were not intended to be adopted in the order that is currently being considered but a few minutes' difference would not be a problem. Councilmember Olson suggested an option would be holding an emergency meeting on Friday afternoon to discuss the remaining tree code amendments and the existing moratorium issue. Mayor Nelson said he was not available on Friday. Councilmember Olson said the Council could have a meeting without the Mayor. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she also was not available. Council President Paine restated the motion: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 23 7.1.a TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4217, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM EMERGENCY REGULATION TO PROHIBIT THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LANDMARK TREES ON A TEMPORARY BASIS, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM REGULATION, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED TO AMEND TO CHANGE "LANDMARK" TO "SIGNIFICANT" AND CHANGE "24" DBH" TO THE DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT TREE WHICH IS 12" DBH. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1); COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO ADOPT THE AMENDED DRAFT TREE ORDINANCE AS DISCUSSED EARLIER TONIGHT, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING EXISTING TREE CUTTING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING NEW TREE RELATED REGULATIONS, NEW CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN REGULATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW TREE FUND. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was leery of doing this when it was not complete. There have been examples in the past where there has been an attempt to bring ordinances forward and the minority could not get it done. She hoped there was a promise that additional amendments could be considered, noting she has about nine more amendments. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO AMEND BY REMOVING SECTION 4, "ORDINANCES 4200 (MORATORIUM) AND 4201 (ASSOCIATED INTERIM REGULATIONS) ARE HEREBY REPEALED." Councilmember Buckshnis hoped the Council would spend quality time to consider all the amendments and address the moratorium next week or when it expires. She felt it was premature to have Section 4 in the ordinance. As City Clerk Passey began to take a roll call vote (Councilmember K. Johnson abstained and Councilmember Distelhorst voted no), Councilmember Olson raised a point of order that the original moratorium stated the moratorium would expire when the tree code was passed or when it expired, whichever came first. Ms. Hope recalled it stated a 4-month period which would be March 101h unless Council acted to repeal it sooner. Mr. Taraday read from the ordinance, "The moratorium imposed by this ordinance shall commence on the date of adoption of this ordinance. The moratorium shall not terminate until four months after the date of adoption unless it is repealed sooner. The Council shall make the decision to terminate the moratorium by ordinance and termination shall not otherwise be presumed to have to occurred." He explained that is the language he referred to earlier as untested. He suggested if the Council's intent is not to have the moratorium repealed right away, amending Section 4 to read, "The effectiveness of Ordinance 4200 shall be extended to March 24, 2021" which would give the Council two more weeks to resolve anything outstanding in the tree code. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with waiting two weeks, anticipating at 10:14 p.m., the Council could be meeting half the night trying to make all the amendments. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO EXTEND FOR 5 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Nelson restated the motion: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 21 Packet Pg. 24 TO AMEND BY REMOVING SECTION 4, REPEALING ORDINANCES 4200 AND 4201. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-2-1); COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND OLSON, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO; AND COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND TO ADD A NEW SECTION TO THE ORDINANCE, "ORDINANCE 4200 IS EXTENDED TO MARCH 24, 2021." Councilmember Distelhorst asked if the motion needed to include Ordinance 4201. Mr. Taraday recommended they be handled as a package as they were originally adopted as a package. He requested adding "effectiveness" so the motion stated, "The effectiveness of Ordinances 4200 and 4201 will be extended to March 24, 2021." Council President Paine restated the motion: TO AMEND TO ADD A NEW SECTION TO THE ORDINANCE, "THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORDINANCES 4200 AND 4201 IS EXTENDED TO MARCH 24, 2021." Councilmember K. Johnson asked which ordinances these were, whether it was the moratorium ordinance. Council President Paine answered yes and Ordinance 4201 was the associated interim regulations. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO EXTEND FOR 7 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (6-1) COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS VOTING NO. 2. 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDOR PUBLIC PROCESS Due to late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson reported today the President and Governor announced additions to those eligible for immediate access to the vaccine - school educators and licensed childcare workers. As more people become eligible, hopeful the availability of vaccines will also increase. The numbers in Snohomish County continue to drop, yesterday's report was 109 cases/100,000 (previously 119/100,000). That is still not enough fast enough so he encouraged the public to continue wearing masks, washing hands, and watching their distance. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Olson wished all be well and happy. Councilmember Distelhorst said March is Women's History Month. He is honored to serve alongside his colleagues on Council. International Women's Day is March 8t', a big day in his household because in Mongolia where his wife and two daughters are from, it is actually a national holiday. While he lived in Mongolia, it was a widely celebrated holiday Anyone interested in learning more about notable figures, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 22 Packet Pg. 25 7.1.a the Sno-Isle Library has a recommended book list for adults and teens including a lot of graphic novels that are more approachable and easier to read than non-fiction history books. There are also a number of events this Sunday and Monday related to Edmonds' International Women's Day. He gave a huge shout out to Dr. Kizzy Corbett, one of the key scientists developing the Moderna vaccine; his mom finally got her first shot this morning. Councilmember Buckshnis wished Jack Beven, a former Councilmember, a Happy 98th Birthday. Mr. Bevin is doing well and often asks about the tree code. She announced the Potlatch Bistro at Edmonds Waterfront Center is opening March 4th. Reservations can be made at OpenTable; up to 50 people can be seated and the view is gorgeous. Council President Paine said she was excited about tonight's actions. She referenced the recent difficulties with Perrinville Creek, expressing her appreciation for the Mayor and Administration's leadership in providing an outline of what has happened and their plans; improvements that have been needed for nearly a decade. She was glad to see the Edmonds School District representatives talking about the capital levy. She wished everyone be safe and well. Councilmember L. Johnson said she was excited and relieved teachers are now eligible for vaccination; they have been shouldering a huge burden with many unknowns. There was a lot of excitement in her household when then learned teachers would be eligible. Student Representative Roberts was delighted to hear that educators are now able to get the vaccine and glad it was one step closer to going back to school. He was able to get the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine a few weeks ago as a volunteer for Swedish and he encouraged everyone to get vaccinated when it is offered to them so this virus can be put in the past. He urged the public to wear a mask, make safe choices and check in with each other as we're all in this together. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:24 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 23 Packet Pg. 26 7.1.a Public Comment for 3/2/21 Council Meeting: From: cdfarmen Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 9:17 AM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Prposed Tree code Dear Council Members, Amending the proposed tree code to meet the expectations of retention and no -net -canopy loss will be no easy task. The terminology used throughout the proposed code is not restrictive enough to prevent the unabated cutting of the trees the city wants and needs to protect. Initially, I was under the impression the 35% tree retention was a requirement. But, what came to find out it was not a precondition nor an obligation on the developer to retain 35% of the trees on the property. When I asked Mr. Lien about that, he said the intent expressed by the Planning Board, was to make the 35% retention the first effort (or step) in tree retention. That being the case, if the developer chooses not to meet that level of retention, the next option becomes cut and replace followed by a third option of cut and pay. No matter how you perceive the proposed tree code, clear -cutting is still a viable option for the developer. Without some true retention requirements, how do you achieve a goal of no -net - loss of canopy or anything ecologically related? The statement at the top of page 7 where it says "significant trees on lots proposed for development or redevelopment shall be retained as follows". That clearly is a misrepresentation of reality. Doesn't the definition of "shall be" indicate that there is an obligation to preserve rather than an option? There are parts of the tree code where the term prohibited is used such as in the case of certain situations within described critical areas or in the case of "protected trees". Why not prohibit the cutting of a specified percentage of all viable trees on the property? Why not make the applicant be a responsible partner in tree retention? There needs to be a " stop limit" required so that, at a minimum, for example, 20% of all existing viable/significant trees must be preserved. Such a required retention limit is needed so the developer cannot clear-cut the entire subdivision site and "buy their way out" of any tree retention measures. The other weakness in the proposed code is that the Director has far too much discretion in deciding how to apply the tree code. There are more than 12 cases where the director reserves Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 24 Packet Pg. 27 7.1.a the right to take certain discretionary actions. How can the tree code be appropriately applied under those circumstances? It is very important that you develop a vigorous tree protection code, one that can prevail in its first real test of its effectiveness when applied to the development of the Seaview Woods subdivision. Respectively submitted, Duane Farmen Seaview resident From: Bonnie Kirby Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 8:23 AM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Tree issue Hello! I want to second the email sent to you from Johanna Malloy, my neighbor. She has stated exactly what I would have sent to you. New tree issues really need to be addressed. Thank you. Bonnie Kirby From: Johanna Molloy Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:33 AM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: New Tree Code Dear Edmonds City Council, Thank you for all you do to maintain our beautiful town of Edmonds. As you are reviewing the new Tree Code, we would like to call your attention to a few issues that we feel are of vital importance: 1) Safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles around street corners that are extremely dangerous because of overgrown trees, bushes and out of control vegetation. This includes not only visual impairments as people approach an intersection (both walking and driving), but potential dangers from falling trees and limbs -especially during stormy weather. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 25 Packet Pg. 28 7.1.a 2) Trees that infringe on PUD, cable and/or other communication wires that can cause potential fires, lack of quality in communication lines and repeated trimming trips to the same location to try and keep areas clear. This can cause aesthetically negative outcomes, as well as rising costs for consumers. (See pictures below -facing both directions and directly from across the street.) 3) Real Estate Values on "View' properties that decline because of neighbors that do not honor other's views and financial investment by keeping the trees on their property maintained/trimmed. 4) Please make sure that there is reasonable consideration for individual situations that may need extra attention because of extenuating circumstances. For example, the measurements used to address whether or not a tree is an issue in the pictures below, may not reflect the fact that during non-Covid lockdowns, many children cross that intersection on field trips to the water, which is one block away. There are also many joggers, parents with strollers and dog walkers that make visiting 2nd and Edmonds their daily routine. One can clearly see that these limbs (that now spread almost completely across the entire street since these pictures were taken) are a danger and annoyance as people try to avoid them, regardless of the actual measurements. We hope that you will consider these community concerns. We know that MANY neighbors where we live on 2nd Ave N, have complained over the years regarding the overgrown trees on the NW corner of 2nd and Edmonds Street. PUD has approached the owner of the property there (121 Edmonds St) and offered to remove the trees at no cost to the owner and even provide a voucher for new trees, but the owner refused. We love the trees here in the Pacific Northwest. However, we also love being civically pro- active regarding safety in our community, preserving our exceptional views and keeping our financial investments secure. Thank you again for all your hard work. We appreciate your time and attention to these concerns, Johanna and Bill Molloy PS Please forward this email to any parties that may be helpful to addressing our topics and concerns. From: Katy Bigelow Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 4:31 PM Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 26 Packet Pg. 29 7.1.a To: Lien, Kernen <Kernen.Lien @edmondswa.gov>; Dill, Debra <Debra.Dill@edmondswa.gov>; Spellman, Jana <Jana.Spellman@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Notes to consider for the tree code Basic edits are needed: 1. Revise: 2. Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ) as established by the ISA Track to read "TRAQ" not "Track" 2. Should be noted that development which contains a Critical Area are held to different standards .. and those standards locations need to be referenced. Questions: 1. How are 30% or 25% retention requirements determined? Is it by total tree diameters? By best looking trees according to the developer/tree professional? By canopy cover? 2. B. No tree replacement is required in the following cases: 8.3.e Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment 5: Tree Ordinance (Draft Tree Regulations and Subdivision Code Amendment) 15 1. The tree is hazardous, dead, diseased, injured, or in a declining condition with no reasonable assurance of regaining vigor - By determination of a tree professional? 3. Under civil penalties, "If illegal tree topping has occurred, the property owner shall be required to have a certified arborist develop and implement a five (5) year pruning schedule in addition to monetary fines and required tree replacement. " what if the tree professional determines that pruning is not the best course of corrective action or can not be completed as the tree is close to a total loss? Final thought: The City would benefit from having an actual arborist on the Tree Board. This is a strong recommendation that could yield better advice in future rounds of edits. Katy Bigelow ISA Board Certified Master Arborist° International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist PN-6039B PNW ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Registered Consulting Arborist® #490 Member - American Society of Consulting Arborists Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 27 Packet Pg. 30 7.1.a From: Eunice Jones Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:02 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Re: Citizens Housing Commission Please vote NO to urbanize and up zone all of Edmonds. Affordable housing will NOT be accomplished with the Urban Density proposals that are scheduled to be presented to you on Tuesday, March 16. And our family lot suburban neighborhood will likely be gone if you approve those policy proposals. Those consequences would be tragic. Please do not destroy our Edmonds. Thank you, E. A. Jones From: art jones Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:09 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Citizen Housing Commission 02/26/2021 Open Letter to Edmonds City Council RE: Citizens Housing Commission believe the Commission should be thanked for their time and effort to achieve more affordable housing in Edmonds. believe their final list of 15 proposals is a VERY large negative for current residents of Edmonds. believe implementation of those proposals would have an irreversible effect on the ambience and character of Edmonds and ultimately help produce the opposite outcome of the original intention. PLEASE! PLEASE! DO NOT ALLOW SUCH TO BECOME IMPLIMENTEDH Thank you, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 28 Packet Pg. 31 7.1.a A.L.Jones Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 2, 2021 Page 29 Packet Pg. 32 a+ a 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #246355 through #246470 dated March 4, 2021 for $492,646.40 (re -issued check #246361 $1,001.00) and wire payment of $2,264.59. Approval of replacement payroll checks #64622 and #64623 dated March 3, 2021 for $9,312.09, payroll direct deposit and checks #64624 through #64627 for $610,826.79, benefit checks #64628 though #64633 and wire payments of $597,255.76 for the pay period February 16, 2021 through February 28, 2021. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 03-04-21 wire 03-04-21 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-04-21 payroll summary 03-05-21 payroll benefits 03-04-21 Packet Pg. 33 7.2.a vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246355 3/4/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account INV-2-8235 INV-2-8235 - EDMONDS PD - SPEEF 3 SGT CHEVRONS FOR COG 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-8763 INV-2-8763 - EDMONDS PD - SGT C 40 SGT CHEVRONS PATCHES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-8807 INV-2-8807 - EDMONDS PD - HARD' V2 TACTICAL PANTS 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 INV-2-8808 INV-2-8808 - EDMONDS PD - STRAP EXTERNAL CARRIER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2 NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 NAME TAPE VELCRO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SAFARILAND ID PANEL 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 VELCRO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BIANCHI RADIO CASE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 TOURNIQUET POUCH 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BIANCHI CUFF CASE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Page: 1 aD L 3 c �a .y Amoun 0 a aD r U d 8.9 , N 0.9- m t U 119.6( - c 12.0E M c �a 49.9� o L �a 5.0. E 200.0( ,- 0 16.0( > 0 10.0( a Q 10.0( N 10.0( c M 0 35.2E 36.0( c 34.0( E t 35.4E Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246355 3/4/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 246356 3/4/2021 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 246357 3/4/2021 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) INV-2-8809 INV-2-8809 - EDMONDS PD - MACH 4 PANTS- ALTERATIONS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-8810 INV-2-8810 - EDMONDS PD - BROW RICHARDSON VELCRO CAP 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 EDMONDS PD EMBROIDERY 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-8811 INV-2-8811 - EDMONDS PD - SHIER DANNER BOOTS 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 Total 15-86740 INTERPRETER - lA0144765 INTERPRETER - 1 A01 44765 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 Total 40568 PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSI PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 41399 PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSI PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 42123 W WTP:2/24/21 PEST CONTROL SE 7.2.a Page: 2 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 32.0( 3.2< m z U 12.9� m c 8.0( M c 2.1, 0 L 219.9E a E 22.2- .� 883.8: 0 �a 0 L 170.0( a 170.0( Q N 0 125.0( M 0 13.0( E U 125.0( r- E 13.0( U Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 246357 3/4/2021 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL (Continued) 0 Pest Control Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 73.0( u 10.4% Sales Tax L 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 7.5� Total: 356.55 m 246358 3/4/2021 078304 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS INV346053 INV346053 - CUST WAS125 - EDMC v 9MM RED MARKING CARTRIDGES 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,260.0( BLACK HELMET W/NASAL SEAL 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,085.0( PROTECTIVE THROAT/COLLAR 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 294.0( o GROIN PROTECTOR - MALE >, 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 378.0( a GROIN PROTECTOR - FEMALE E 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 315.0( 'ji 9MM BLUE MARKING CARTRIDGE 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,285.0( 0 Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 50.0( o Total: 4,667.0( a Q 246359 3/4/2021 065568 ALLWATER INC 021921029 WWTP: 2/19/21 ACCT: COEWASTE: v 2/19/21 Acct COEWaste:- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 29.8E c 10.4% Sales Tax c� 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 0 3.1( Total: 32.9E E .ii 246360 3/4/2021 001528 AM TEST INC 120072 WWTP: SAMPLE 21-A001208 U SAMPLE 21-A001208 c 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 25.0( E 120079 WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A000535-539 SAMPLES 21-A000535-539 Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code Voucher 246360 246361 246362 Voucher List City of Edmonds usbank Date Vendor Invoice 3/4/2021 001528 AM TEST INC (Continued) 120085 120131 120132 120133 3/4/2021 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 138087-2113 3/4/2021 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC 328906-2113 PO # Description/Account 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A000794-797 SAMPLES 21-A000794-797 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A001371-137" SAMPLES 21-A001371-1373 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A000880-882 SAMPLES 21-A000880-882 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A001055-105f SAMPLES 21-A001055-1059 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total APA-MEMBERSHIP (MCLUGSTON) APA membership (MClugston) 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 APA-MEMBERSHIP FEES APA Membership ($424) & Subscriptii 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 Total 6683808 AMWINS - FEBRUARY LEOFF 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 FIRE 617.000.51.589.40.23.10 6728588 AMWINS - MARCH LEOFF 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 FIRE 617.000.51.589.40.23.10 Total 7.2.a Page: 4 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 355.0( 'D r U d L 300.0( N m 105.0( U m c 105.0( M' c �a 185.0( p 1,075.0( `>, M a E 533.0( U 4- 0 �a 468.0( 0 1,001.0( a Q N 7,887.9, c ch 1,226.9" N E 7,887.9, c 1,226.9" E 18,229.7E U �a Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 37 7.2.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM City of Edmonds a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 246363 3/4/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1992111193 WWTP: 2/10/21 UNIFORMS,TOWEL 0 m Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 51.4E u Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1' L 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.4' '0 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.3E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.1E 1992120422 WWTP:2/17/21 UNIFORMS,TOWEL (D Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 51.4E Uniforms: Jeanne - 3 Lab Coats $0.1 ' 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.4' o 10.4% Sales Tax `>+ 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 �a 5.3E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.1E 1992120424 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 0 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E > 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0 1 a 656000001856 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE Q PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 61.1 E 10.4% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.3, CO) Total: 216.9' 246364 3/4/2021 078097 ARMSTEAD CONSULTING INC 7 CONSULTANT FOR EQUITY/SOCIAL 2 ESJTF CONSULTANT }; 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 1,125.0( (D Total: 1,125.0( E U 246365 3/4/2021 064452 ARMSTRONG SERVICES 4356 WWTP: 2/2021 JANITORIAL & COVI ca Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 246365 3/4/2021 064452 ARMSTRONG SERVICES (Continued) 0 2/2021 JANITORIAL SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 880.0( u 2/2021 COVID DISINFECTANT SER\ L 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 480.0( Total: 1,360.0( m 246366 3/4/2021 001699 ASSOC OF WA CITIES 872257 2021 D&A CONSORTIUM FEE v PARKS 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 123.3' STREET 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 431.E , WATER 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 308.X o SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 370.0( a FLEET E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 61.6, 'ji STORM 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 555.0( 0 Total: 1,850.0( 0 246367 3/4/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 120148 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS a UB Outsourcing area Printing # Q 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 46.0z v UB Outsourcing area Printing # 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 46.0z c UB Outsourcing area Printing # c 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 47.4, UB Outsourcing area Postage 658 E 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 133.4, 2 UB Outsourcing area Postage 658 ; 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 133.4, a0i 10.1 % Sales Tax E 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 4.6E U 10.1 % Sales Tax Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246367 3/4/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 120259 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,908 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,908 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,908 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2,908 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2,908 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total 246368 3/4/2021 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 70451 ROUGH BOX - BERGMAN ROUGH BOX - BERGMAN 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 Total 246369 3/4/2021 078306 BARBARA STEWARD 3-40925 #784209RT UTILITY REFUND #784209RT Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Total 246370 3/4/2021 002100 BARNARD, EARL 22 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 617.000.51.589.40.23.00 7.2.a Page: 7 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 4.6E 'D r U d 4.7f 13 203.4E z U 203.4E m c 209.6( c 564.0, 0 564.0E >+ M a 20.5E 20.5E u 0 21.1; > 2,227.3: o a a Q 627.0( N 627.0( o A 0 E 326.8E fd 326.8° c aD E t U 36.0( Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 246370 3/4/2021 002100 002100 BARNARD, EARL (Continued) Total : 36.0( 246371 3/4/2021 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 56469 INTERPRETER - XZ244518 INTERPRETER - XZ244518 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 56657 INTERPRETER - 9Z0915139 INTERPRETER - 9Z0915139 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 125.0( 57267 INTERPRETER - lA0213261 INTERPRETER - lA0213261 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 57396 INTERPRETER - XZ0635360 INTERPRETER - XZ0635360 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 57855 INTERPRETER - lA0139137 INTERPRETER - lA0139137 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 58042 INTERPRETER - XZ0802312 INTERPRETER - XZ0802312 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( Tota I : 625.0( 246372 3/4/2021 002258 BENS EVER READY 20236 INV 20236 - EDMONDS PD YEARLY SERVICE - 8 FIRE EXT. 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 40.0( 8 EXTINGUISHER RECHARGE 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 120.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 16.61 Total: 176.61 246373 3/4/2021 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0013421 BUILDING -PROF SVCS Prof Svcs for Jan 2021 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 1,055.2E Total: 1.055.2E Page: 8 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246374 3/4/2021 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 246375 246376 246377 246378 246379 3/4/2021 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 3/4/2021 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 3/4/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 1233620 FLEET - AUTO PROPANCE 742.10 FLEET - AUTO PROPANCE 742.10 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total 9627 9631 YOGA 9627 9631 YOGA/PILATES ONLINE 9627 YOGA ONLINE INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 9631 YOGA/PILATES ONLINE INSTF 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total 9635 TRAINING 9635 PERSONAL TRAINING ONLINE 9635 CIRCUIT TRAINING ONLINE IN 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total 26214987 CANON FEB 2021 CANON FEB 2021 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 3/4/2021 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC 486011 3/4/2021 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 7671136 Total ; PM: YOST POOL PUMP AND MOTOI PM: YOST POOL PUMP AND MOTOI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 Total MS OFFICE 365 SOFTWARE RENE1 MS Office 365 software renewal 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 7.2.a Page: 9 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 910.E1 u 910.61 •`- 13 N m 780.0E r 270.0( c 1,050.0( c �a 16.5( 16.5( a E U 212.5E o M 22.1 - c 234.E j a a Q N 2,739.0( It 0 284.8( c 3,023.8E E 2 U 107,352.6( E t 11,164.6, Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 10 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 246379 3/4/2021 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC (Continued) 0 7868131 MS EXCHANGE ONLINE ADDITION/ MS Exchange online addtional users m 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 717.4( .L 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 74.6- Total : 119,309.21 v 246380 3/4/2021 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310300732547 PUBLIC WRKS - DIGITAL CABLE Public Works - 7110 210th S SW m c 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.3( Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 11.0E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW o 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 11.0E j, Public Works - 7110 210th S SW `0 a 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 11.0E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 10.6z u Total : 46.11 o 246381 3/4/2021 005965 CUES INC 579648 SEWER - PARTS 0 SEWER - PARTS a 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 889.4( Q Freight v 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 21.9� cv 10.4% Sales Tax c 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 94.7� c ) Total : 1,006.1 1 N E 246382 3/4/2021 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3365366 E21 CA.INVITATION TO BID AD R E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 99.8z c E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad E E 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 356.4E U E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246382 3/4/2021 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE (Continued) 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 Tota I : 246383 3/4/2021 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 14218 BACKGROUND CHECKS - FEBRUA BACKGROUND CHECKS - FEBRUA 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 WWTP OVERAGE FOR BACKGROL 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total 246384 3/4/2021 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 INV665293 EXPERT WIT - XZ0704137 EXPERT WIT - XZ0704137 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 246385 246386 246387 246388 3/4/2021 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 273709 3/4/2021 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 3/4/2021 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 3/4/2021 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS GC-OP2APP H RO-O P2AP P 00010113382 Total : PUBLIC SAFETY - ELEVATOR CERT PUBLIC SAFETY - ELEVATOR CERT 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Total WWTP: GCARREON WW OPERATC GCARREON WW OPERATOR 2 APF 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 Total WWTP: HRO WW OPERATOR 2 AP HRO WW OPERATOR 2 APPLICATI( 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 Total PM SUPPLIES: OIL FILTER, AIR FILI PM SUPPLIES: OIL FILTER, AIR FILI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 7.2.a Page: 11 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 266.0E -0 722.4( u m L_ N 100.0( t U 13.5( 113.5( c d c �a 225.0( — 0 23.4( a 248.4( E U 4- 134.1( o 134.1( o L Q a Q 67.0( 67.0( 0 c� 0 67.0( . 67.0( c aD E 98.8E U Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 246388 3/4/2021 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS (Continued) 0 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 as 10.2E -0 00010113424 PM SUPPLIES: ENGINE OIL FILTER PM SUPPLIES: ENGINE OIL FILTER L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.0E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.3E Total: 123.51 U 246389 3/4/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1945 PM SUPPLIES: SAND DISCS PM SUPPLIES: SAND DISCS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.5E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.51 o 2043 WWTP: FREEZE BAGS FREEZE BAGS a 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.9f 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.0z U 2106 PM SUPPLIES: HOOKS, HANGERS, o PM SUPPLIES: HOOKS, HANGERS, �a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.0E o 10.4% Sales Tax L a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 a 2.4( Q 2117 WWTP: WEATHERSEAL v W EATHERSEAL N 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 23.9� c 10.4% Sales Tax CO) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 0 2.4E 2118 PM SUPPLIES: PAINTSHIELD E PM SUPPLIES: PAINTSHIELD f° 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 U 8.9� }; 10.4% Sales Tax a0i 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.9< E 2126 PM SUPPLIES: SPRAYPAINT U PM SUPPLIES: SPRAYPAINT Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246389 3/4/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 246390 3/4/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2132 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2134 PUBLIC WORKS - SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2139 PM SUPPLIES: WRENCH PM SUPPLIES: WRENCH 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total ; 2-25150 WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2-25175 EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 C) EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 Cj 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2-26950 LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 2-28275 PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2-29118 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 7.2.a Page: 13 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 6.0( 'D r U d 0.6, N 41.5-, 4.3, m c a� 9.9� �a 1.01 o L �a a 12.9E E 1.3E u 45 166.8! 0 0 L a a 53.9z Q N 53.9, c M O 109.8, �a 53.9, y E t U 53.9z Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246390 3/4/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 246391 3/4/2021 071858 ENNIS, CATHERINE 246392 3/4/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 2-37180 SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER £ SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER £ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 4-34080 LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 7-05276 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 Total 2005717.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION REFUND: CUSTOMER WITHDRAW/ 001.000.239.200 Total EDH918956 E21 DA.RFQ AD E21 DA.RFQ Ad 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 E21 DA.RFQ Ad 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 EDH919574 E21CA.INVITATION TO BID AD E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 E21 CA. Invitation to Bid Ad 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 EDH920210 ORDINANCE 4214 ordinance 4214 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 EDH920361 PLANNING -LEGAL AD PLN2021-0003- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 EDH920410 PLANNING -LEGAL AD 7.2.a Page: 14 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 77.0E N 58.6( 231.6� c 692.9: c �a 0 35.0( 35.0( a E U 105.8z c �a 62.1 E o L a a Q N 120.2( c CO) 89.7( N E 2 21.0( U c a� E 60.2( U Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246392 3/4/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 246393 246394 246395 3/4/2021 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 3/4/2021 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 319992 320963 0950997 3/4/2021 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 161946 PO # Description/Account PLN2021-0006- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total : STORM - SUPPLIES (DIVERSION S- STORM - SUPPLIES (DIVERSION S- 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 STORM - SUPPLIES STORM - SUPPLIES 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Total WATER/ SEWER - ROUNDPOINT SI WATER/ SEWER - ROUNDPOINT S1 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 WATER/ SEWER - ROUNDPOINT S1 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total FEB-2021 SUPPORT SERVICES Feb-2021 Support Services 7.2.a Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 44.8( u 537.6( .` N m 537.0( 5.0( d 55.8E �a 0 45.0( �a a 4.6£ 647Z5 U 0 �a 89.9' c L a 89.9" Q 27.5( cv 0 12.2" ch 0 V) 12.2' E U 27.5( 259.2' a0i E t U �a Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246395 3/4/2021 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC (Continued) 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 162026 ACID SETUP FOR PARKS/FAC Automated Call Distribution setup for 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Total 246396 3/4/2021 077292 FOSTER GARVEY PC 2779077 DRAFT AMEND TO PFD CONTINGE Draft amendment to Edmonds PFD 001.000.36.515.32.41.00 Tota I : 246397 3/4/2021 071467 GATEWAY PET MEMORIAL WA70014-1-0042 INV WA70014-I-0042 - EDMONDS PI DISPOSAL OF 6 ANIMAL REMAINS 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Tota I : 246398 3/4/2021 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 45269 EBGA.SERVICES THRU 12/31/20 EBGA.Services thru 12/31/20 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 Total 246399 3/4/2021 076542 GRANICUS 137143 CIVIC STREAMING, AGENDA & MIN 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 civic streaming, agenda and minutes 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 Total 246400 3/4/2021 012560 HACH COMPANY 12311786 WWTP: PO 473 PIPETTES PO 473 PIPETTES 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7.2.a Page: 16 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 246400 3/4/2021 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 52.6 j 12313360 WWTP: PO 512 GABLE COVER PO 512 GABLE COVER 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 265.5( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 128.0z 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 40.9, Total : 993.6: 246401 3/4/2021 065764 HASNER, THOMAS W 21 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,252.0( Total: 2,252.0E 246402 3/4/2021 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 2019-242 VIMEO ANNUAL CHARGE VIMEO Annual Charge 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 91.8- Total: 91.81 246403 3/4/2021 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 20 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 2,850.0( REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 799.Of Total: 3,649.0f 246404 3/4/2021 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551953512 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 644.9� 0551953513 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.6( 0551953514 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC Page: 17 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246404 3/4/2021 061013 HONEY BUCKET 246405 3/4/2021 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953515 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953516 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953517 WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953518 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B1 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B1 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953519 MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953520 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551953521 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Tota I : 3443412 TISSUE Tissue 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 3447734 PILOT DR GRIP PENS Pilot Dr. Grip pens 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 7.2.a Page: 18 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 246.0( u 120.4E Y m t 120.4E m c aD M 221.6E �a 0 120.4E `5% M a E 1,514.1, 0 120.4E 0 L Q a 118.2E Q 3,666.41 N 0 CO) 12.3z N E 1.2£ 2 c a� 7.9E E t U 0.81 Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 246405 3/4/2021 073548 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) 246406 3/4/2021 067924 INTEGRA CHEMICAL COMPANY 0136479-IN 246407 3/4/2021 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 6348 246408 3/4/2021 068816 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROT LP 22121849 246409 3/4/2021 078305 KAREN & ANTHONY BURY 8-28750 246410 3/4/2021 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 192 246411 3/4/2021 075149 LIM, VANNARA 193 2021 L-FEB-10 Description/Account Total : WATER - ZDE CHLORINATOR, TES - WATER - ZDE CHLORINATOR, TES- 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 Total FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Mar-2021 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total WWTP: 1/21 ANNUAL FIRE EXTING 1/21 ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHER 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total OVERPAYMENT REFUND Overpayment refund 411.000.233.000 Total : CONFLICT COUNSEL - XZ00396657 CONFLICT COUNSEL - BILLED IN 0: 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 CONFLICT COUNSEL - 8Z1003084 CONFLICT COUNSEL - BILLED IN 0: 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total INTERPRETER - XZ0817470 7.2.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 22.4; m U d L_ 1,740.0( N 38.0( U 184.9" 1,962.91 d M c �a 590.0( — 0 61.3E a 651.3E E U 173.0z o 173.0z c L Q a Q 450.0( 450.0( 0 c� 0 300.0( �a U 100.0( (D 400.0( E U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 246411 3/4/2021 075149 LIM, VANNARA (Continued) INTERPRETER - XZ0817470 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( Tota I : 100.0( 246412 3/4/2021 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0133737 PUBLIC WORKS - PAINT/ SUPPLIEr PUBLIC WORKS - PAINT/ SUPPLIEr 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 82.7.E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.6E Total : 91.3E 246413 3/4/2021 019940 MC COMAS, GARY 25 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,730.9E Total : 2,730.9E 246414 3/4/2021 078307 MICHAEL & MOLLY REEVES 7-05050 #21-104835 UTILITY REFUND #21-104835 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 65.3E Total : 65.31 246415 3/4/2021 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 343635 PM: FORKLIFT RENTAL PM: FORKLIFT RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 377.2.E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 39.2< Total: 416.4f 246416 3/4/2021 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ES130245 UNIT 14 - DPF CLEANING UNIT 14 - DPF CLEANING 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 553.1 £ 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 54.2E Total : 607.35 246417 3/4/2021 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3276-885341 FLEET - PARTS ( RETURNED) Page: 20 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246417 3/4/2021 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 3276-885611 3276-891740 3276-898372 3276-899139 3276-899180 246418 3/4/2021 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 6030448 PO # Description/Account FLEET - PARTS ( RETURNED) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET - PARTS RETURNED FLEET - PARTS RETURNED 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET - PRESSURE WASHER FUEI FLEET - PRESSURE WASHER FUEI 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 FLEET - SHOP PRESSURE WASHE FLEET - SHOP PRESSURE WASHE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 22 - PARTS UNIT 22 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 3 - PARTS/ AIR FILTER UNIT 3 - PARTS/ AIR FILTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 7.2.a Page: 21 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 15.6,1 u L 1.6z N m z -15.6E u 4 c aD c 2.0( 0 0.2- `>+ M a E 4.0( 1i 0.4, 0 Ta 0 L 22.4E a Q 2.3E N 0 24.5( c 2.5 E 58.5: c aD E t 218.8E u Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 246418 3/4/2021 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 22.7E Tota I : 241.6' 246419 3/4/2021 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 10334994 GONAVIA COMMUTER FEES - FEBF FEBRUARY GONAVIA FEES 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 25.0( 10334995 NAVIA FSA FEES - FEBRUARY FSA FEES - FEBRUARY 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 157.7( Total : 182.7( 246420 3/4/2021 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN 44257 PLAQUES PLAQUES: TIPPETT/EDMONDS KIN 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 210.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 21.8E Total : 231.8E 246421 3/4/2021 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO 3188973-00 CITY PARK BUILDING - AIR COMP F CITY PARK BUILDING - AIR COMP F 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 479.6( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 49.8 , Total : 529.41, 246422 3/4/2021 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 70224540 DOT RECERTIFICATION DOT RECERT - YARBROUGH 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 103.0( 70388068 DOT PHYSICAL RECERTIFICATION DOT RECERT - MERBACK 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 103.0( Total : 206.0( 246423 3/4/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 149477208001 INV 149477208001 - ACCT 9052043' DESKPAD CALENDAR 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 1.& Page: 22 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246423 3/4/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 246424 246425 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 3/4/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER February, 2021 3/4/2021 077288 PANG, LAWRENCE 58488 PO # Description/Account DESKPAD DOG CALENDAR 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 BANKER STORAGE BOXES 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANS Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis 001.000.237.170 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 Total INTERPRETER - 8Z0402529 INTERPRETER - 8Z0402529 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 7.2.a Page: 23 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 21.3< u 56.1E N 8.2E 87.5 , u m c d M 969.1 £ �a 14,781.3E o L 451.5( a E 22.1 E v 4,728.5E 0 �a 1,940.4' o a a 934.2 � Q 93.7E 0 7.8� o 126.2( •� 24,055.2i U c aD E 100.0( U �a Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 246425 3/4/2021 077288 077288 PANG, LAWRENCE (Continued) Total : 100.0( 246426 3/4/2021 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC 12522796 PARK MAINT: SEALS, SLEEVE, BLA PARK MAINT: SEALS, SLEEVE, BLA 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 106.4, 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.0E Total : 117.5( 246427 3/4/2021 027450 PAWS JAN 2021 JAN 2021 - EDMONDS PD 4 ANMLS @a $207 - 2 $35 RCLM FEI 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 758.0( Tota I : 758.0( 246428 3/4/2021 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1 G83695 CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 109.1 E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.3E Total: 120.5( 246429 3/4/2021 073988 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING WA12376KE STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING F, STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING F, 111.000.68.542.61.48.00 8,211.1 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.48.00 853.9E Total: 9,065.0f 246430 3/4/2021 075439 PRICOR TECHNICIANS BLD2021-0275 DEV SVCS-PERMIT FEE REFUND Permit App BLD2021-0275- 001.000.257.620 92.0( Total : 92.0( 246431 3/4/2021 029800 PRINZ, DANIEL 24 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,584.7z Page: 24 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246431 3/4/2021 029800 029800 PRINZ, DANIEL 246432 3/4/2021 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200002411383 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 7.2.a Page: 25 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 2,584.7' 0 U d L_ 1,793.1, N m 2,503.1( m c 53.9E c �a 457.7- o �a a 1,263.91 E U 157.8 c �a 0 1,633.6' a a Q 1,253.7( 0 M 624.9E N E 382.9E c aD E 371.8E u Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 246432 3/4/2021 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 0 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 47.01 u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; L 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 178.8E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Y 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 178.8E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; v 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 178.8E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; c 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 178.8E m PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 178.8E f° 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE o CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE `>+ 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 �a 491.6z 220023412418 WWTP: 1/21-2/19/21 METER 00039C 1/21-2/19/21 METER 000390395 200 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 2,588.5E ,u Total : 14,518.4< 0 �a 246433 3/4/2021 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-030619 UNIT 107 - BATTERY o L UNIT 107 - BATTERY a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 102.2- Q ., 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.6< N Total: 112.8z o A 246434 3/4/2021 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 18001605 WWTP: SLUDGE DEWATERING PL y CO 1: $17,880 & CO 2: $7620 E 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 25,500.0( fd Total: 25,500.0( }U, c 246435 3/4/2021 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-6118783 UNITS 123 & 29 - PARTS aD E UNITS 123 & 29 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 296.6E Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246435 3/4/2021 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 246436 3/4/2021 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 246437 3/4/2021 037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 23 1000551714 246438 3/4/2021 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 3318 246439 3/4/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202547 200260271 200398956 200468593 200493146 PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 Total : Total ; Q4-2020 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS Quarterly Liquor Board Profits 001.000.39.566.10.41.50 Quarterly Liquor Excise Taxes 001.000.39.566.10.41.50 Total PUBLIC DEFENSE CONTRACT - FIE FEBRUARY CONTRACT FEES 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M 7.2.a Page: 27 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 30.8f u 327.51 •L N m 5,700.0( 5,700.0( m c a� 1,692.4- 1,360.3, 3,05217 a E U 31,764.5E o 31,764.5E 0 a a 17.1 Q N 278.1- c M 0 898.6E U c 335.1 E E t U �a Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 246439 3/4/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 200611317 200638609 200714038 200739845 200865202 201197084 201327111 201431244 201551744 201572898 201611951 201751476 PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PINE ST PARK PINE ST PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / P 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 7.2.a Page: 28 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 17.7z r U d 126.8( N Y U m 372.8z U m c 20.7E c �a 16.7< p 0 �a a 83.5, U 45 131.5E 0 �a 0 L 17.1, a Q 18.8c N 0 A 0 3,547.6E 2 U 49.3z c aD E 34.Of U �a Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246439 3/4/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201942489 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202291662 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1, CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1, 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 202439246 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 7.2.a Page: 29 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 46.9' u 18.3, m v 28.7( (D c d 98.7- �a 375.1- 0 L 375.1- a E 375.1- 1i 375.1- 0 �a 375.0� a a Q 142.8, N 0 56.9E CO) E 2 6,242.5E U c aD 3,372.6E E U �a Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246439 3/4/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Renewable Energy Pilot Program 423.000.76.535.80.47.00 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 7.2.a Page: 30 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 491.8, 'D U d 21.5E 13 3,089.7z 19 m 5,142.6E U 261.2� c d 82.0, �a 54.5z o L �a 206.3E E 84.6E 478.7; 0 �a 5,704.7E a a 8.9, Q N 82.0, 0 c� 0 19.0E M 327.9z aD E z 78.7- Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 246439 3/4/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 0 222704280 WWTP: 1/20-2/18/21 METER 10001� 1/20-2/18/21 200 2ND AVE S / METE U 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 25,956.9" .L m Total: 59,941.15 N 246440 3/4/2021 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2021-6682 INV 2021-6682 - JAN 2021 - EDMON m 78.67 BASE RATE AT $142.63EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 11,220.7( 39.5 BOOKINGS @ $128.88EA c 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 5,090.7E 10.25 VID CT HRS @ $207.96EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 2,131.5E Total: 18,443.0° o 0 246441 3/4/2021 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Nguyen, Nang CRITICAL AREA NOTICE: NANG NG a critical area notice request - nang 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 106.5( •E Total: 106.5( U 246442 3/4/2021 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 3357 MAR-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA 4- 0 MAR-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA > 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 0 70,384.0£ a MAR-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA Q 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 1,852.2- MAR-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA N 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 1,852.2- It Total: 74,088.5( M 0 246443 3/4/2021 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER February 2021 Crime Victims Court Remittance U) E Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 313.8( Total: 313.8( aD 246444 3/4/2021 078303 SOIL CONTROL LAB 1010519 WWTP: INCINERATOR ASH TEST E incinerator ash test U �a Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246444 3/4/2021 078303 SOIL CONTROL LAB (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Tota I : 246445 3/4/2021 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Total 246446 3/4/2021 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 102373/4 SEWER - WORK WEAR J. CLEMEN SEWER - WORK WEAR J. CLEMEN 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 Total 246447 3/4/2021 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 55763 FIRE STATION 17 - SERVICE FOR V FIRE STATION 17 - SERVICE FOR V 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total 246448 3/4/2021 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY S103333821.001 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 7.2.a Page: 32 Page: 32 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 246448 3/4/2021 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY (Continued) S103335271.001 246449 3/4/2021 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV64632 246450 3/4/2021 078203 TOTAL TESTING 55255 246451 3/4/2021 075141 TREATMENT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1764 246452 3/4/2021 070774 ULINE INC PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total CITY HALL - TANK SYSTEM WITH F CITY HALL - TANK SYSTEM WITH F 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE ASST TESTING ADMIN ASST TESTING 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Total WWTP: PO 513 HIGH 1-12S CAPACIT PO 513 HIGH 1-12S CAPACITY MEDIE 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 Total 130329617 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Freight 7.2.a Page: 33 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 11.2� 'D U m L 24.7, 13 N 2.6( 4) 146.1; U m c d 347.7z c �a 9.9£ o 37.2( a 394.9: U 0 140.0( ii 140.0( c L Q a Q 4,851.0( N 475.0( M 0 553.9( E 5,879.9( 'm c a� 122.5( t U �a Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246452 3/4/2021 070774 ULINE INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 246453 3/4/2021 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 123698 246454 3/4/2021 071549 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 246455 3/4/2021 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 246456 3/4/2021 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE fi NPH131 48950975 8803838088 201134932 PO # Description/Account 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 PARKS - DUMP FEES PARKS - DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total : Total : WWTP:2/9/21 CAUSTIC SODA 2/9/21 CAUSTIC SODA 423.000.76.535.80.31.52 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.52 Total WWTP: PO 511 LAB NITRILE GLOVI PO 511 LAB NITRILE GLOVES 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total INV 201134932 EDMONDS PD - COL COLLISION INV BASIC - DANIELS 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 COLLISION INV BASIC - HAIR 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 COLLISION INV BASIC - STEFFINS 7.2.a Page: 34 Page: 34 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246456 3/4/2021 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Continued) 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 201134940 INV 201134940 EDMONDS PD PATR PATROL RIFLE INST. - GAGNER 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total: 246457 3/4/2021 078202 WALDIE, JACK 02/09/2021 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 Total 246458 3/4/2021 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 213247 INV 213247 - CS 21-4228 - EDMONE TOW BLACK AUDI - CS 21-4228 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 246459 3/4/2021 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 121-189 PM: TREE REMOVAL: 2ND & DAYTC PM: TREE REMOVAL: 2ND & DAYTC 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 Total 246460 3/4/2021 075283 WAVE 3201-1027483-01 FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF High Speed Internet service 03/01/21 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total 246461 3/4/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 12136703 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.2.a Page: 35 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 100.0( 'D r U d L 600.0( 900.0( m v 20.9z c 20.9' c �a 184.0( o �a a 19.3, 201% E 2 U 4- 0 2,225.0( o a 231.4- Q- 2,456.41 Q N 0 816.0( o 816.0( 1,764.0( (D E t 183.4E U Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 246461 3/4/2021 075635 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) Total 246462 3/4/2021 078302 WEBER, CAROL 1 VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total 246463 3/4/2021 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7956 INV 7956 - EDMONDS PD 5 BOXES OF #10 CITY ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 7957 BUSINESS CARDS FOR DEV. SERb business cards for dev services for 001.000.62.524.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.20.31.00 Total 246464 3/4/2021 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 32543 PM: PLANTS PM:PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 246465 3/4/2021 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 554804 STORM - WORK WEAR M. BROWN STORM - WORK WEAR M. BROWN 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 556837 STREET - WORK WEAR T. HANSOM STREET - WORK WEAR T. HANSOM 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 7.2.a Page: 36 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 1,947.4( 0 U d L_ 500.0( 500.0( m 256.6( m c d 26.6� -a c �a 63.0( o �a a 6.5E 352.8' . �a U 4- 0 2,231.0( o a 232.0, Q- 2,463.0: Q N 0 274.4< CO) 26.8E U c 125.0E E t 12.2E um Q Page: 36 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 246465 3/4/2021 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR (Continued) 557739 246466 3/4/2021 075743 WHISTLE WORKWEAR OF SHORELINE 198116 246467 3/4/2021 073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 246468 3/4/2021 063008 WSDOT 246469 3/4/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER i 64247626 RE 41 JZ0186 L010 253-012-9189 425-771-0158 PO # Description/Account STORM - WORK WEAR A. REYES STORM - WORK WEAR A. REYES 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Total WWTP: HYUK RO RAINGEAR/RAINI HYUK RO RAINGEAR/RAINBOOTS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 WWTP: HYUK RO 2021 UNIFORM A HYUK RO Uniform Allowance Purcha 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 Total PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER, GRAS: PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER, GRAS; 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total E20CE.PROJECT COSTS FOR JAN( E20CE.Project Costs for January 202 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Total WWTP: JAN/FEB 2021 AUTO DIALE JAN/FEB 2021 AUTO DIALER - 1 V, 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 7.2.a Page: 37 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 430.04 13 42.1E 910.8E m c 323.9 33.0E 0 220.4< a E 22.4E 599.9' 0 Ta 0 910.2E a a Q 94.6E v 1,004.9, N 4 0 M 0 798.0E E 798.0 'M c aD 92.7' t U �a Q Page: 37 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 03/04/2021 8:33:27AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 246469 3/4/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 246470 3/4/2021 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 116 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 116 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-771-5553 WWTP: JAN/FEB 2021 AUTO DIALE Jan/Feb 2021 AUTO DIALER - 1 BU 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Total: 35108-A PM: PARTS FOR WATERFRONT CE PM: PARTS FOR WATERFRONT CE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 7.2.a Page: 38 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 141.1' u L_ 273.5" m 141.1' m c aD M 26.4, 674.9, 0 �a a 194.5z E 20.2z U 214.7E IS 0 493,647.4( o L Q 493,647.4( Q N O M O N E 2 V C E t V f6 Q Page: 38 Packet Pg. 71 7.2.b vchlist 03/04/2021 9:10:32AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 3042021 3/4/2021 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 0091 US BANK - EW SUPPLIES - HEADSET AND WEBCA 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 WWTP JOB POSTING - APW 423.000.76.535.80.41.40 WWTP JOB POSTING - PNCWA 423.000.76.535.80.41.40 9644 GAMEZ FEB 2021 CC STMT MPA MEMBERSHIP FOR 2021 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 WA STATE PROBATION MEMBERSF 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 MRT SPANISH BOOKS 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 MRT TRAINING FOR OMAR AND SH 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 0 a d 0 96.0E m =a 325.0( Y m 200.0( u w m c 80.0( 50.0( 276.0z L, �a a 11237.5( 2,264.55 2,264.55 0 2,264.55 0 L Q El 3 El Page: 1 Packet Pg. 72 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project vi Funding Project Title Number Number a� STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB E STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA Q. SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA L 3 STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC c WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA r STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA p CL STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB U a� WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA Y STIR2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA aUi t STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA r STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB c STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA m STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB o L STIR 2020 Waterline Overlay i053 EOCC sz STIR 2021 Guardrail Installations i057 E21AB STIR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA v STIR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21AA STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB STIR228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC Q STIR238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC EL STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB N STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA c STIR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) i052 E20CB c") 0 STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA E STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC Z STIR89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD a STIRADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB d W STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB c m STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA m STIR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA Li STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC m SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB E t STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC U STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB r r Q PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 73 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STIR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA SWR Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 E21 GA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STIR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) i055 E20CE UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment s026 EOJB PRK Yost Park Infiltration Facility c556 E21 FA Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 74 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title 2020 Guardrail Installations �MIIIIII STIR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i048 2020 Traffic Calming STIR EOCA 1042 2020 Overlay Program i053 2020 Waterline Overlay STIR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR ALOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update 1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements E20CB "=� 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) STIR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) STM E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements STIR E21AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming STIR E21AB i057 2021 Guardrail Installations STIR E21 CA i051 2021 Overlay Program STIR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave PRK E21 FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility SWR E21 GA c559 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR E21JA c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project STIR E3D6 1IL238th St. SW WalkwayApOth Ave to 1 STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration WSTM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station WR W Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c443 monds Fishing Pier Rehab STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System Bikelink Proje STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c479 lWaview Park Infiltration Facili SWR ESGB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 75 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) JEEVc473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DD SWR E6GB E7AB STR E7AC i017 Minor Sidewalk Program Stormwater Comp Plan Update c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall M STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WMW WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement c544= Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) ' STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive _ E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th iE8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps iE8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Stulw� STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance rolec SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project _ E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement UTILITIES E8JB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update E8M"- - �urth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 76 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STIR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design) PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STM E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements PRK E21FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility WTR E21JA c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project SWR E21GA c559 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 77 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STIR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STIR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STIR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STIR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STIR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STIR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STIR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STIR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STIR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STIR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming STIR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STIR E21CA i051 2021 Overlay Program STIR E20CB i052 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) STIR EOCC i053 2020 Waterline Overlay STIR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) STIR E21AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming STIR E21AB i057 2021 Guardrail Installations STIR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s02O 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STM E91FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STIR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update WTR EOJB s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 78 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Proiect Engineering Accounting Proiect Funding Proiect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA PRK Yost Park Infiltration Facility c556 E21 FA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STIR 2021 Guardrail Installations i057 E21AB STIR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA STIR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21AA STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) i052 E20CB Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 79 7.2.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Proiect Engineering Accounting Proiect Funding Proiect Title Number Number STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) i055 E20CE STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STR 2020 Waterline Overlay i053 EOCC STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA SWR Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 E21 GA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment s026 EOJB WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA Revised 2/24/2021 Packet Pg. 80 7.2.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,001 (02/16/2021 to 02/28/2021) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 119 SICK Donated Sick Leave -used 15.34 871.29 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 576.84 29,019.05 122 VACATION VACATION 865.69 43,936.91 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 84.00 4,134.23 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 37.00 1,792.60 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 106.13 5,151.59 130 COMP HOURS Holidav Compensation Used 28.00 1,181.08 135 SICK WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEA 4.00 86.70 142 DISABILITY DISABILITY PAY 9.00 368.94 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Dav Used 90.00 3,880.75 154 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY BUY BACK 4.50 124.46 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 171.78 8,879.46 158 VACATION VACATION PAYOFF 52.00 1,438.20 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 1.00 66.54 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 1,400.00 19,833.24 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 300.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICP 0.00 3,496.07 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 13,550.15 689,280.15 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 5,126.84 194 SICK Emerqencv Sick Leave 423.00 22,136.29 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 54.50 3,314.95 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 29.75 1,110.73 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 24.00 1,328.91 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 13.00 1,347.15 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 223.50 15,172.01 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 36.00 2,716.84 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 159.11 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 349.01 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 962.46 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 628.78 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 95.25 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 154.25 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 -12.00 0.00 03/04/2021 Packet Pg. 81 7.2.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,001 (02/16/2021 to 02/28/2021) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 900 VACATION ACCRUED VACATION -15.34 0.00 901 SICK ACCRUED SICK LEAVE 15.34 0.00 902 MISCELLANEOUS BOOT ALLOWANCE 0.00 381.25 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 67.01 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 177.41 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 96.39 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 87.93 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 179.12 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 404.96 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 1.00 deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOI 0.00 89.56 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 122.69 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 1,028.08 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 692.13 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 552.86 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 5,950.92 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 481.56 fmis SICK FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 104.00 4,851.30 fmlv VACATION Familv Medical Leave Vacation 24.00 1,119.53 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 8.00 532.33 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 251.53 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 85.68 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 1,066.95 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 599.74 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 4,013.57 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,308.13 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 1,287.20 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 583.73 I0 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 365.21 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 1,122.60 Ici6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 366.12 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 277.76 Iq9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 193.99 03/04/2021 Packet Pg. 82 7.2.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,001 (02/16/2021 to 02/28/2021) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 122.69 ooc MISCELLANEOUS OUT OF CLASS 0.00 750.60 nds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,364.97 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS 0.00 194.64 pto MISCELLANEOUS Traininq Officer 0.00 163.58 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 301.49 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 194.64 st REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pav 0.00 141.08 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 521.80 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 122.69 18,176.68 $901,512.54 Total Net Pay: $610,826.79 03/04/2021 I Packet Pg. 83 7.2.e Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,001 - 02/16/2021 to 02/28/2021 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 64628 03/05/2021 bpas BPAS 4,788.75 0.00 64629 03/05/2021 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 46.00 0.00 64630 03/05/2021 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 408.56 0.00 64631 03/05/2021 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 3,413.72 0.00 64632 03/05/2021 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 4,066.39 0.00 64633 03/05/2021 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 2,244.76 0.00 14,968.18 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 3169 03/05/2021 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 323,448.33 0.00 3171 03/05/2021 aflac AFLAC 5,274.02 0.00 3173 03/05/2021 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 108,082.48 0.00 3174 03/05/2021 us US BANK 110,363.89 0.00 3175 03/05/2021 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 28,868.17 0.00 3177 03/05/2021 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,486.19 0.00 3178 03/05/2021 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 764.50 0.00 582,287.58 0.00 Grand Totals: 597,255.76 0.00 3/4/2021 Packet Pg. 84 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 Youth Commission Presentation - Pronouns Staff Lead: Casey Colley Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Shannon Burley Background/History The Edmonds Youth Commission, established in June 2018, is comprised of eleven (11) positions; nine (9) voting and two (2) alternates. City Council members each appoint one (1) member and the Mayor appoints two (2) voting and two (2) alternates. Members are required to live within the City of Edmonds and be in grades 9 through 12. The mission of the Edmonds Youth Commission is to protect, preserve and enhance the quality of life for Edmonds Youth by advising City Council and the public on issues relating to youth policies, programs and opportunities. Staff Recommendation The Youth Commission recommendation to the City Council is to request that all Commission and Board Members, include their pronouns in their email signature, Zoom titles as well as in their biographies on any webpage belonging to the City of Edmonds. They Mayor has agreed to make the same request of all City staff. Narrative There are many individuals who identify with different pronouns such as they/them instead of he/him or she/her. The Youth Commission feels it is important for the City of Edmonds to foster a welcoming environment for these individuals by addressing them by their preferred pronouns. Requesting that everyone includes their pronouns in their email signature, Zoom title and biography would prevent the use of incorrect pronouns, ensuring that all individuals can be addressed in the manner that they prefer. It would also help people feel more comfortable sharing their preferred pronouns and contribute to a feeling of inclusively within the City of Edmonds. The Youth Commission believes that adding pronouns will support the following outcomes: Ensuring Edmonds continues to be inclusive for all people of different identities Creating a welcoming environment for non -binary and transgender individuals who use their personal pronouns so they can fully represent themselves when dealing with city -related matters Preventing the misgendering of individuals The Youth Commission recommends that the City Council sends a notification to all boards and commissions requesting the use of pronouns in email signatures, Zoom titles and webpage biographies. This notification should include a basic tutorial to changing your name on Zoom (attachment #1), as well as changing your email signature (attachment #2), and introduce the common format: "Name Packet Pg. 85 8.1 (pronouns)". These pronouns should include personal pronouns (he, she, they, etc.) and objective personal pronouns (him, her, them, etc.). This recommendation has the support of the Diversity Commission. The Youth Commission recognizes that this recommendation will need cooperation from Commission and Board Members of the City of Edmonds in including their pronouns in their email signature and Zoom name and request that the suggested completion date is as soon as possible. Pronouns should be added to website biographies once the city moves to the new website platform. Attachments: Attachment #1 Tutorial_ Changing Zoom Name to Include Pronouns Attachment #2 Tutorial_ Changing Email Signature on City Account Pronouns Request Presentation - EYC Packet Pg. 86 8.1.a Changing Your Zoom Name to Include Your Pronouns (Permanently) See pages 3 through 6 of this document for options of changing your zoom name temporarily to include your pronouns on a laptop/desktop or mobile device during a meeting. On any web browser on your laptop, tablet, or phone: 1. Go to zoom.us and log in to your zoom account. There is an option to "sign -in" in the upper right corner of the main page. If you are already logged in, click on the option titled "my account" also in the upper right corner. 2. Once signed in, click on "profile" in the column of page options on the left side of the screen. Q My Meetings -Loom x } — B X E 4 C 4 a uso4web.mom.us/meeting#/upcoming {7 ®® 0 r 0 O* Interesting Articles ❑ Academic Resources a SW a AP Calk Gradebook 00 SCC • Sterling Q Calendar `Notion v Skyward IS Ciry Email 0 Messages Other bookmarks ZOOMSOLUTIONS- PLANS S PRICING CONTACT SALES SCHEDULE A MEETING JOIN A MEETING HOSTAMEETING- Important Notice: Dueto increased demand,dial-in by phone audio conferencing capabilities maybe temporarily removed fromyourf-ee Basic account. DuHngthis dme,westrongly X recommend using our computer audio capabilities. If you require dial -in by phone audio conferencing, please see our other package options. PERSONAL Meetings Get Training Profile I� �O7S-' Previous Personal Room Meeting Templates Webinars e to End Time Schedules Meeting Recordings Settings The user does not have any upcoming meetings. O ADMIN To schedule a new meeting click Schedule a Meeting. � User Manaeemen[ uPb.zo .us/profle4:47 Pm 3. Once you are on the profile page for your account, click on "edit" which is adjacent to your name. ,G My Profile -Zoom x } — 0 E 4 X 4 a uso4web.zoom.us/profile a 4 ® ® O a 0 OI * i . Interesting Articles Academic Resources -3 SW � AP CaIc Gradebook 08 SCC 0 Sterling pn Calendar 41, Notion v Skyward IN City Email 0 Messages n ! Irer bookmarks ZOOMSOLUTIONS- PLANS S PRICING CONTACT SALES SCHEDULEAMEETING JOIN A MEETING HOSTAMEETING- 46 Important Notice: Due to increased demand, dial -in by phone audio conferencing capabilities may be temporarily removed from your free Basic account. During this time, we strongly X recommend using our computer audio capabilities. If you require dial -in by phone audio conferencing, please see our other age options. PERSONAL Brook Roberts EdIR Meetings Brook Roberts Cl Webinars Change Delete Recordings Settings Personal Meeting ID """ """'437 Show https://.sO4web.zoom.us/1/**'**'*437?pwd=*"*"" Show ADMIN x Use this ID for instant meetings O a User Management javascript; Sign -In Email bro"' outlook.com Show Packet Pg. 87 8.1.a 4. After you've clicked "edit", there will be options for you to edit first and last name, display name, and more. Change your display name to include your pronouns, then click on "save changes". © .,-file I... X } - B X E-) C Q A uso4web.zoom.us/profile w T} ®® 0 1130*•- L] Ime-ting Articles Q Academic Resources 0 SW 2 AP Eel, Gradebook m.n. SIZE 0 Sterling pi Calendar %, Notion v Skyward In City Email 0 Messages ❑ Oderbookmarks SCHEDULEAMEETING JOIN A MEETING HOSTA MEETING . Important Notice: Due to increased demand, dial -in by phone audio conferencing capabilities may be temporarily removed from your free Basic account. During this time, we strongly recommend using our computer audio capabilities. If you require dial -in by phone audio conferencing, please see our other package options. PERSONAL (First Name Last Name Brook ( Roberts Meetings - Display Name Webinars Brook Roberts (he/him) Cnange Delete Recordings Display name could be your first name or your nickname, or other name you want other people know you on Zoom. Settings Phone Select Country/Region > Us Phone Number User Management Department O e.g. Product 0 My Pile -Zoom x } - 0 X E 4 C O Ii us04web.zoom.us/profile a {?• ® 0 0 o r. Interesting Articles F. Academic Resources ,Z, SW M_ AP Calk Gradebook SEC Sterling pn Calendar 4%, Notion w Skyward 13 ON Email Q Messages Other bookmarks MOMSOLUTIONS- PUNS &PRICING CONTACTSALES SCHEDULEAMEEfING JOINAMEETING HOSTAMEETING j Company/Organization Name Location Attend Live Training l e.g. San Jose Video Tutorials Cancel Knowledge Base personal h' """'437 Show Edit https://,sO4web.zoom.us/j/"""'437?pwd="""" Show x Use this ID for instant meetings Sign -In Email bro"'@oud-ccom Show Edit Linked accounts: 0 License Type O trip[ Basic 9 Upgrade You have changed your display name in zoom meetings to permanently include your pronouns! From now on, your name in zoom meetings will automatically include your pronouns. N C 0 r_ 0 a` c W W a) IL` r_ N N E E 0 45 z M 0 Packet Pg. 88 8.1.a Changing Your Zoom Name to Include Your Pronouns (Temporary, Only During Meeting) On a mobile device (including phones and tablets): 1. While the zoom meeting is open, locate the participants menu, and click on it. It should be in the upper right corner or along the bottom of your screen, depending on which type of mobile device you are using. 2. It will have opened a list of participants in the meeting. Next, press your name that is on that list of participants. Packet Pg. 89 8.1.a 3. After you've pressed on your name in the list of participants, a list of options should appear. Press the option titled "rename". 4. After pressed you've "rename", a new window will prompt you to make changes to your zoom name in the meeting. Here, you can your pronouns after your name. Press "done" once you've made the changes. include Packet Pg. 90 8.1.a And now you have temporarily changed your zoom name to include your pronouns! The change will only last during your current zoom meeting. See page S for instructions on how to change your zoom name to include your pronouns while in a zoom meeting on a laptop or desktop device. On a desktop or laptop device: Packet Pg. 91 8.1.a 1. While the zoom meeting is open, locate the participants menu, and click on it. It should be along the bottom of your screen. �J Zoam Meeting — 6,' X 2. It will have opened a list of participants in the meeting. Next, hover your mouse over your name in the list of participants. Then, there should be options to either unmute/mute or to "rename". Click on "rename". In the case that there is an option next to unmute/mute titled "more", click that, then click on the "rename" option. Packet Pg. 92 8.1.a 4. After, clicked you've on the "rename" option, a new window will appear, prompting you to change your name. Here, you can include your pronouns after your name. Click "OK" once you have made the changes. 5. Once these changes have been made, you can close the participants window. Packet Pg. 93 8.1.a And now you have temporarily changed your zoom name to include your pronouns! The change will only last during your current zoom meeting. Packet Pg. 94 Tutorial: Changing Email Signature on City Account to Include Pronouns On any device with a browser: 1. Log onto your city email on Outlook in any web browser. 2. Once logged on, look for a gear icon, and click on it. It will lead you to a shortened version of your email settings. 3. A new window will appear on the right side of the screen. At the bottom, click on "View all Outlook settings". 4. In the new window that is shown, click on "Compose and reply" in the list of options in the second column. 5. From there, you can change your email signature to include your pronouns. Once done, you can click "Save" which is in the lower right corner of the window. You have now put your pronouns in your email signature! This change will take place during the next email you draft and will last until it is changed. Packet Pg. 95 Edmonds Youth Commission Inclusion of Pronounsin email signatures, Zoom, titles, and biographies 8.1.c Background - Changing views of gender and growing acceptance - No longer acceptable to assume someone's gender identity based on their appearance - Important to understand complexities of gender in day-to-day life and how important gender identity is to people Packet Pg. 97 8.1.c Our goals w - Ensuring Edmonds continues to be inclusive for all people of different identities - Creating a welcoming environment for non -binary and transgender individuals who use their personal pronouns so they can fully represent themselves when dealing with city -related matters - Preventing the misgendering of Q individuals Packet Pg. 98 8.1.c Implementation Plan - Recommend City Council sends a notification that requests the use of pronouns in email signatures and in Zoom titles to all board and commission members - We have created tutorials (included in the agenda memo) of how to do this and and the standard format: "Name (pronouns)" - Website is being updated Requested completion timE As soon as possible Packet Pg. n99 8.1.c Potential Impacts on City - Would require some effort on the part of commission, board, and staff members Packet PgI 00 8.1.c Quest40 ions O U W Q Packet Pg. 101 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Public Process Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Economic Development Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor has been a concept -level project envisioned and in preliminary planning stages since 2004. It was the keystone capital project included in the City's application for Creative District designation. In 2020 the City hired Crea Consultants to assist us in developing working concepts for the Corridor improvements, as well as engaging the public for their input and preferences. The attached presentation, which will be presented at the 3/9/21 Council meeting, summarizes the project's background, objectives, concepts explored and public input/preferences. Staff Recommendation Request Council direction on preferred improvement concept to develop further in future schematic design development. Narrative See presentation. Attachments: Presentation Packet Pg. 102 4 City of EDMONDS 4T" AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDOR 2020 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN and PUBLIC PREFERENCES PD1410 V eom0Nvs CREATIVE 7"' DISTRICT I 8.2.a I Packet Pg. 103 1 In 2020 staff worked with CREA AFFILIATES, on concepts a48 public process Considerations: What is Edmonds Cultural Corridor? What is special about the location? - How did it come to be? Creating a special place Considerations for Schematic Design - roadway and public spaces bm 4 AV' K �- —- Z� } F - r 4T" AVENUE EXISTING MURALS, EDMONDS ■ I 8.2.a I Packet Pg. 104 1 WHY HERE? The City of Edmonds ... Celebrates A seaside ambiance Appealing small-town quality A walkable downtown An active art community Showcases year-round events Community sense of pride and involvement in the arts ■ Certified as the State's first Creative District ■ Civic commitment to arts and culture Integrates artwork into the "fabric" of public spaces y M J V 0 d a 0 0 U U a 0 E a Packet Pg. 105 1 Goals ■ Draw pedestrians between the ECA and downtown businesses. ■ Transform a unique street into a walkable arts destination. ■ Establish a new community gathering place. ■ Provide a visible and accessible space to display temporary art and host related activities. Packet Pg. 106 1 I 8.2.a I Objectives ■ Connect the Edmonds Center for the Arts with Main Street through an enhanced and unique pedestrian connection. ■ Welcome mixed -use development with upper story residential uses. ■ Accommodate a variety of cultural events and exhibits that will attract visitors and stimulate economic development. Packet Pg. 107 1 I 8.2.a I Cultural Corridor Concept • Celebrates the variety in arts and culture in the Edmonds community. Establishes a unique and memorable sense of place. • Includes permanent and temporary cultural features and events. Supports key goals of Edmonds Creative District • Draws residents and visitors to the downtown area. a Packet Pg. 108 1 Arts and Culture... • Transform the commonplace into surprising moments. • Bring mystery and magic to a streetscape experience. • Create a memorable experience. • Strengthen community. C" a Packet Pg. 109 1 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS xo wa. IL t �i .�••. ' f s" 4Q FERRYTERMINAL r o���••_...••.:.I cj ♦ i b • �sB f 1 wrst r' � m. • ••. PORT OF EDMONDS 101, IT CASCADIA ART BRACKETTS LANDING MAIN STREET MUSEUM NORTH AND SOUTH 4,4W ". .., zp CITY HALL VTOWN CREA VE DISTRICT BOUT PMY %'PUBLIC SAFETY CIVIC PARK COMPLEX ■ Uninterrupted views between the ECA and downtown. ■ A block from City Hall, the Public Safety Complex and Civic Park. ■ Intersects with major paths between the waterfront and civic facilities. a I Packet Pg. 110 1 Characteristics ■ A quiet street. ■ Historic buildings. ■ Less than an average 350 cars/ day in either direction at Main Street. ■ Few driveways onto 4tn ■ Secondary access through rear alleys. ■ Artwork references community history. s F � r PERFORMING ARTSCEWER I IS t FINE $FAAON W- COUNCIL .i - CHAMlFA$ evil I [RY Al p "All W1fWMANO - — From CB /• IE� PueLIC p CONUfRC- I � MI%EDuSE - ALLEY _ $IREEI in i LANo1CA1'e ■ TRIM— ROPE _ . - -- All_r wDCES4 --- 5ORN uaE -- WE $FORM __M l WREN LIN[ RROPERIY u,E Q Packet Pg. 111 1 I 8.2.a I 4thAvenue Cultural Corridor 2004-05 Planning Board - Identifies Arts Corridor on 41" which leads to a creation of BD5 zoning. 2007-09 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Service Department gets 50,000 from the National Park Service's Preserve America for 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Implementation & Funding Plan. 2016 Interim Public Art Project funded by EAC and Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation "Luminous Forest" by artist lole Alessandrini 1 1 1 1 1 1 Li LA L♦l 1 1 t l � 2006 2014 2016 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Service Department updates the Streetscape Plan, adding the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor Concept Plan. Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services updates Community Cultural Plan that prioritizes interim steps to implement the 4th Ave Cultural Corridor Plan. 2018 Community identifies completion of 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor as goal in 5 year work plan as a part of its Creative District designation. Western Washington University and Association of WA Cities on Sustainable Cities Partnership develop four potential public relations campaigns. 2020 A tentative conceptual design is developed and tied to cost estimates. Through public input schematic design direction was identified. I I 1 I Ll Li Lil I l 2019 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services contracts for a site survey and a consultant to facilitate development of a feasible project concept. Meetings held with ECDAC and the public. Packet Pg. 112 1 I 8.2.a I 2005-6 i ■ T� sr '+ A I � ■ SECTION 1 L SECTION 2 9TR�xG7HGN I rzn�gr�iAN 1 G�WyCC7�N _ i I JL � SECTION 3 r G Packet Pg. 113 1 BUILDING THE i= RECURRING THEMES FROM PUBLIC INPUT R Art reflecting both ends of corridor. ■ Sequential discovery of art elements. ■ Elements that are approachable and interactive. ■ Space for cultural events. ■ Space for street artists. Pocket park at Sprague. Encourage artist studio store fronts. ■ Outdoor cafe seating areas. a Packet Pg. 114 1 BD-5 Zoning ■ Ground floor with commercial space ■ Shall be oriented to 4th Avenue ■ At least one building entry shall face 4th Avenue ■ Architectural details and/or applied art shall be incorporated ■ If structure is set back from the street, it shall have landscaping and/or artwork ■ Live/work uses are encouraged within the BD5 zone. �SITEIDARDS Designated Streel Front M`C ak e � , B02 ]` s. y r .�MFSy /TI� (itl2 904 BO y � N ALDER sr w r '¢ Boa HOWELL VIAY N W a � x LJI I- - W EkBEH Wi ''- BD2 EY ST OALE'i ST w m� sT 4—FTTT _F II BELL ST S h N'? m tt MAPLF .ST1- }T c +�. aLUEct sr I x ��::: `M MAIiNISLIA L.4 w1 HGk ELA,: R HEMLOCK WAY _ MFULorx w:,. I 8.2.a I a Packet Pg. 115 1 Designated Streel Front M`C ak e � , B02 ]` s. y r .�MFSy /TI� (itl2 904 BO y � N ALDER sr w r '¢ Boa HOWELL VIAY N W a � x LJI I- - W EkBEH Wi ''- BD2 EY ST OALE'i ST w m� sT 4—FTTT _F II BELL ST S h N'? m tt MAPLF .ST1- }T c +�. aLUEct sr I x ��::: `M MAIiNISLIA L.4 w1 HGk ELA,: R HEMLOCK WAY _ MFULorx w:,. I 8.2.a I a Packet Pg. 115 1 I 8.2.a I ■ New downtown public restrooms. ■ Art elements that reflect history, like "The Stages of History" walking tour. ■ New Cascadia Art Museum. ■ Downtown Murals project. ■ Creative District designation by ARTSWA. 0Yrt e D M 0 N O S CREATIVE — DISTRICT — http://www.edmondsstagesofhistory.com STAGES OF HISTORY MARKER ,S CASCADIA ART MUSEUM a i Packet Pg. 116 1 [ OVER THE YEARS ■ I 8.2.a I LA I Packet Pg. 117 1 Creating a Special Place 2020 Concept 4 I 8.2.a I a Packet Pg. 118 1 DALEY STREET GATEWAY it ■ . r-� � Ml�t•r r� �y � ir ' I60 fF M. [1 • r i. RIrl;i I • -', y�� MAIN STREET GATEWAY r,all Proposed Phasing: Three blocks will be ■ REBUILT AND RECREATED FOR PEDESTRIAN -ORIENTED DESIGN ■ RECAST FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT ART INSTALLATIONS ■ REMANDED TO ALLOW FOR COMPLEMENTARY ACTIVITIES IN THE PUBLIC REALM a I Packet Pg. 119 I f! M 1 f, t7 r Ir el - ` _}�J t � � t lr 9 Main to Edmonds Streets. ■ WILL BE DESIGNED FOR ACTIVE USES SINGLE EVENT OR SHORT PERIOD OF TIMES ■ WILL HOST PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EXHIBITS SCULPTURE, PAINTING, POETRY, LIGHT ART ■ MAY HOLD EVENTS PUPPET SHOWS AND MUSIC TO STREETPLAYS AND DANCE a Packet Pg. 120 1 Main to Edmonds... ■ Tie into utility improvements at Main Street intersection. Enhance Bell and Edmonds Street intersections. Create a pedestrian oriented experience. ■ Allow for flexibility in display and safe walking during events. Allocate space for permanent and temporary art and events. ■ Create places to convene. ■ Plan for occasional displays and performances in roadway by closing to vehicular traffic. Packet Pg. 121 1 i Owl io 11 . r7- kp NA 14 MA y �- • Af�j/ l► Now IL wi 15-0 I ��l El Packet Pg. 127 1 PIF oLj < _ r rn r "- c t rF rn MAIN STREET • t t D �s s 'm r^ • �2 Edmonds to Daley Streets. ■ WILL BE DESIGNED FOR PASSIVE USE WALKING DOG, PEOPLE WATCHING, POCKET PARK AT SPRAGUE ■ WILL INCLUDE NEW LANDSCAPING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AT EDMONDS STREET INTERSECTION ■ COULD HOST SHORT-TERM EXHIBITS ON SIDEWALKS SCULPTURE, PAINTING, POETRY, LIGHT ART ■ WILL TRANSITION FROM 3RD AVENUE ENTRY A NEW BOULEVARD AND ENTRY PLAZA AT DALEY COULD BE DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ECA a Packet Pg. 128 1 For this block... ■ Enhance intersections. ■ Retain street profile. ■ Explore a tree -lined boulevard along the west sidewalk. ■ Create a pocket park at Sprague Street. ■ Develop places to rest and talk. ■ Recreate surface light art in this section. a� 0 L a- ci L 0 •L 0 U L U a' 0 w E a Packet Pg. 129 1 'else ?4 3NA 'Im 7 Pop__ owl V- I En 5 M +WMRIM 7) fray_ ,;;. �}'��� `►9� .A .%t '� .dt.'I' Wk. d-, _ 1 Z �Ys. I 8.2.a I _ SAFE WALKING SURFACES � 1 IMAS S r - r IP .7 M' I XRT a Packet Pg. 133 1 COLOR IN SPACE F •i! �; d � may* ' � . � . BOLLARDS IbHTING �� MAR S PLANTS o ' + PAINTED INTERSECTIONS SCULPTURES ,J) I Packet Pg. 135 1 PASSIVE ART �!!, ~ , * P �:. lit oo� lot ■yl� j � � ... `"''•�'liawREAMI F� ...,.. -- LIGHTING - • ART AS LANDSCAPE Sol _ 1} ip MA �ay,& ARTS . LIGHT IN THE LANDSCAPE Considerations for Schematic Design 4 I 8.2.a I Packet Pg. 137 1 Main to Edmonds... ■ How do we create an art - infused safe and inviting pedestrian connection? ■ With limited right-of-way how can we provide more space for people and art? ■ What option (s) would you choose for reshaping 4tn Avenue's public right-of- way? How can we carve out a space that adjusts to unique site conditions? h, Phase 1 How do we get there? 4 I 8.2.a I a Packet Pg. 138 1 I 8.2.a I MAIN TO BELL STREET I % 4 ry©•� �•� _ ___---- TRAVEL LANE 701 7. 0" 36, 0„ 7' 0„ - i 81DEWALK ROADWAY � SIDEWALKj � 7 I 50, 0" < STREET WIDTH z i. 50, p» .i z m 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY' m Per 2020 Property Survey FEATURES ■ Two-way travel lanes. ■ Parking on both sides. ■ Built to roadway standards. ■ Sidewalks wide enough for 2-3 people. ■ Landscaping at Main Street and a few street trees. ■ Three overhead lights. FUNCTION ■ Free flowing traffic. ■ Occasional vehicular conflicts at Main Street intersection. - Maximum parking. ■ Limited space for art or performances ■ Limited greenery. ■ Moderately lit. r a Packet Pg. 139 1 I 8.2.a I P)ELL TO EDMONDS STREET b j SIDEWpu AL ROADWAY SIDEWALK j-0 j STREET WIDTH j� z �- 60, 0" .i z m I RIGHT-OF-WAY' Im FEATURES ■ Wider right-of-way. ■ Narrower roadway. ■ Two-way travel. ■ Parking on both sides. ■ Narrow, cracked sidewalks. ■ Low-level lighting in roadway (luminous forest). FUNCTION ■ Maximum parking. ■ Not standard travel lanes. ■ Slow traffic. ■ No landscaping in the public realm. ■ Limited space for art or seating. ■ Relatively dark walkways. . Per 2020 Property Survey 0 L a- 2 L 0 �L L 0 U L r U a� a� Q t c 0 r r C d N N a c E a Packet Pg. 140 1 I 8.2.a I BELL TO EDMONDS STREET STREET WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY' FEATURES ■ Two-way with parking on both sides. ■ Standard travel lanes. ■ Standard sidewalks for 3-4 people and amenities New pedestrian scale vertical lighting. Per 2020 Property Survey FUNCTION ■ Wider roadway. ■ Wider sidewalks with some art space. ■ Wider streets for events. ■ Underground overhead poles and wires ■ Brighter walkways. ■ Street edge close to buildings. Q Packet Pg. 141 1 ■ Need a minimum of 8' for an inviting and comfortable pedestrian experience. ■ Need a minimum of an additional 4' for art, displays and activities. ■ Maintain vehicular access per fire safety standards. ■ Retain parking (on one or both sides) . ■ Width of public sidewalk can vary to accommodate individual site conditions. ■ Art space beyond sidewalks can be overseen by adjacent properties. EXPAND REDUCE OUTWARDS ROADWAY 9. ,ter I I I I I i i i i i i i i i i j 81 0" I 4, 0" I 7, WALKING AMENITY O TRAVEL ZONE ZONE LANE i Packet Pg. 142 1 I 8.2.a I Roadway Options For existing street width between Bell and Edmonds IAM ! a yf} Packet Pg. 143 1 I 8.2.a I M r j4r ... I i 22 0" T D" A TRAVEL LANE i_ 7' 0" 29' 0" 7' 0 U l `'SIDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK -a 43' 0" I j STREET WIDTH m I RIGHT-oF-WAY' I m FUNCTION ■ Similar roadway and sidewalk widths. Similar traffic flow. Half the number of parking spaces. Underground overhead poles and wires. ■ Limited space for pedestrian lighting. ■ Art and seating space in perimeter greenspace overseen by private property owners. ' Per 2020 Property Survey a Packet Pg. 144 1 FUNCTION ■ Roadway and sidewalk widths unchanged. ■ Traffic flow north between Main and Edmonds Street. ■ Maintain number of parking spaces. ■ Limited space for pedestrian lighting. ■ Art and seating space in perimeter greenspace overseen by private property owners. ■ Reduce vehicular conflicts at Main Street intersection. ■ Wider sidewalks between Main and Bell Streets. - Per 2020 Property Survey B.2.a I a Packet Pg. 145 1 I_ 22' ❑" 10' 6" T j '^ .j `� SIDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK l,u MI 43'0" J I� STREET WIDTH j M I RIGHT-OF-WAY' I m FUNCTION ■ Roadway narrowed by 8.' ■ No parking between Bell and Edmonds Streets. ■ Same traffic flow. ■ Wider sidewalks for seating, lighting and art. ■ Additional art and seating space in perimeter greenspace overseen by private property owners. - Per 2020 Property Survey a Packet Pg. 146 1 I 8.2.a I I KAV L L LAN L r7 I i 0" 33' 0 U j IDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK• j M MI 43'0" IM j STREET WIDTH j z j= 60, 0,, z m I RIGHT-OF-WAY' .j I m FUNCTION ■ Roadway widened by 3.' ■ One-way traffic flow north of Bell Street to Edmonds Street. ■ Similar number of parking between Bell and Edmonds Streets. ■ Narrower sidewalks do not allow for seating, lighting and art. ■ Additional art and seating space in perimeter greenspace overseen by private property owners. Packet Pg. 147 1 Which of the street v-Ngj sections do vou refer? TR-llEl LAN yI PIDEWALK ROADWAY STR EETWIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY' TRAVE. LANE ROADWAY 43(r STREET WID`rH �j WGI RIGHT-OF-WAY' O STREET SECTIONJ!m ROADWAY SIDEWALK jy 43'(r STREETWID7H So Q, RIGHT-OF-WAY" Im MAVEL LANE ROADWAY 43'0' lA STREETWID7H �j BUG' 2 j� RIGHT-OF-WAY' - Im qw- w IM=ELLANE ji). (r 3a, (r SIDEWALK 10-0. SIDEWALK ROADWAY rje'er Ar It BUILT -TO -STANDARDS —acket FP Pg. 148 I 8.2.a I Focus on Pedestrian Realm Options for creating a pedestrian realm for art, activities and a generous space for walking. . V 6 q I r a Packet Pg. 149 1 NEW EDGE I 8.2.a I 6' 6" 30' 0" 15' 0" 0 j PI�EWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK 0 L 51' s' IT STREET Wi ETH I �= 60' 0', z m I RIGHT-OF-WAY` Piz I m Per 2020 Property Survey FUNCTION ■ One sidewalk is widened by 9'. ■ Wider sidewalk allows for art, seating and pedestrian lighting. ■ The other sidewalk does not allow for pedestrian lighting. ■ Art and seating space for the narrow sidewalk is in the perimeter greenspace that will be overseen by private property owners. a Packet Pg. 150 1 '1 l-f O 8' 0„ _ 4' 6'. 30' 0" ■ 4' 6» . S' 0„ � I O v I SIDE^ ROADWAY SIDEWALK! —0 M I �. 55' 0' I M STREET WIDTH �j I m I RIGHT-OF-WAY' I m Per 2020 Property Survey FUNCTION ■ Both sidewalks are widened for 3-4 people and pedestrian lighting but not enough to accommodate art or seating. ■ A landscaped strip separates the sidewalk from the roadway and can hold pedestrian lighting and art / seating. Additional art and seating space is in the perimeter greenspace that will be overseen by private property owners. a Packet Pg. 151 1 fp rol p i= 10' 6„ 50EWALK m� I < �I ml s0° 0" ROADWAY 5110, STREET WIDTH 60. 0" RIGHT-OF-WAY' FUNCTION ■ Both sidewalks are widened for art/ seating and pedestrian lighting. ■ Additional art and seating space is also available in the perimeter greenspace that will be overseen by adjacent property owners. 10' 6" SIDEWALK i ' Per 2020 Property Survey I 8.2.a I Li a Packet Pg. 152 1 3.2.a I 30' Q" 15' ❑" i ;0 0 j SIDEWALK ROADWAY ��� SIDEWALK �� 0 < I STREET WIDTH I� �- 66" 6"� z m I RIGHT-OF-WAY' i .z m Per 2020 Property Survey FUNCTION ■ Both sidewalks are widened for maximum art/ seating and pedestrian lighting. ■ Potential for mid -block landscaped areas and planters. Packet Pg. 153 1 8.2 a Which pedestrian realm do you prefer? N O L a 2 ■ w O �i I ib� 4. . 4, L V 67��. IPIDEWALK SIDEWALK �l0 I ROADWAY SIDEVJALNj ly - STREET WIDTH I [� L STIE�i ET ET WI al m I` R1GK-OF-WAY' T-OF �x Im m!- -- I 6-O RIC1Frt�F-OF Ir Im 7 iv xmu nepm am-. h'xw�arm d d C O — M r+ t. •I 9i r �Y L a �I �f SIDEWALK ROADWAY SN]EM1NFLIC �I SIDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK G� 51'°' I� Ip AI WC, Im [� GC I STREET W1DTk [� I STREET WOTH ;� S m I jm m 1 RK3F1TdF-WAY- aim RI T-OF -WAY" Packet Pg. 154 1 I 8.2.a I PA • Virtual Open House held 8/24/20 • Online Survey 8/25 - 9/26/20 • 214 responses received (32 during Open House; 182 from survey) Pedestrian Safety and Amenities are a Priority • safety of walking surfaces • wider walking areas • added seating • unique lighting • trees and plantings • art elements like colorful crosswalks • permanent sculpture • occasional exhibits • opportunity for mini seasonal fairs 160 140 120 1C0 W 60 40 20 0 5 a Packet Pg. 155 1 s Pedestrian Safety and Amenities are a Priority 1 0 � b` 9w 0 L a- V L 0 0 U L r U 3 c a' c� c m rn a� L CL C a) E L c.i Q Packet Pg. 156 1 I 8.2.a I s Preferences for Street Cross -Section and Sidewalk Treatment 70 ..... 60 4( 30 20 i3 Two-way] One -Way Narrow One -Way Built to parking 2 parking Roadway Back -In Standards 20 ,0D y 80 .... 60 40 20 New Edge Wide Edges Landscaped Full Buildout Walks The preferred option for future schematic design is the One-way Two -Parking Alternative with a focus on enhancing the pedestrian realm. This could be accompanied by new seating, adding color and unique lighting to the street, as well as making sure that the entire public space can host occasional or permanent exhibits, sculptures and events. This option maintains parking, while enhancing walkability, including artistic treatment and allowing for gatherings. Depending on location, improving portions of the right-of-way where encroachment exists would occur on a case -by -case basis and in close coordination with the property owners. Packet Pg. 157 1 I 8.2.a I Next Steps Council may wish to adopt the publicly preferred concept and design preferences This will inform schematic design development in the future Schematic design development will also involve public input and Council review L iL 2 a 0 �L 0 U R L U a 0 L E c,> r a Packet Pg. 158 1 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 Analysis of Direct Hire vs. Contracted Social Worker Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History Council approved $500,000 for the Human Services program for the 2021 budget year. A portion of this money was to be used for a Social Worker position. At the February 23rd Council meeting a job description for this position was presented. It was discussed that once approved the job description could either be used to directly hire a Social Worker or to address the scope of services for a contracted Social Worker. Council indicated they wished to see a comparison of the two models. An analysis has been completed and at this time the administration is recommending that the contracted service model will best meet the goals of the City in establishing this position. Staff Recommendation Review analysis and approve the contracted Social Worker model. Narrative Please see the attached comparison matrix and white paper analysis of contracted vs. direct hire Social Worker models. Attachments: Analysis of direct hire vs contract (final) Social Worker Model Comparison Matrix Packet Pg. 159 9.1.a Analysis of direct hire vs. contracted Social Worker model Goals: Immediate: Immediately address the health, welfare, and human services needs of Edmonds' at -risk residents and do so in a way that delivers exceptional services and leverages allocated monies in order to achieve the most services possible. Together with the Human Services Program Manager, assess human services needs and gaps in Edmonds that will inform long-term decision making. 1 Year: Using needs assessment data collected during the first year, establish the long-term plan and structure for the Edmonds Human Services Division and continue building the Human Services Program 18 Months: Launch the long-term structure for the Human Services Division. Recommendation: In order to meet the immediate needs of the residents of Edmonds, it is recommended that the City contract with a human services agency to provide a dedicated Social Worker who is specifically assigned to Edmonds and whose duties align with the job description approved by Council. Building a full-fledged Human Services program should be done in a way that is targeted and thoughtful and use data to drive deliverables and measure success. Contracting with a human services agency to provide social worker services at this time will allow the City to gather data on needs and gaps in Edmonds in order to make long-term decisions regarding the Human Services program. Once data is gathered, long-term decisions can be made regarding structure, program offerings, and whether continued contracting is in the best interest of the program goals. Key analysis areas: Service Levels: Contracting will allow for services to begin very quickly once a contract is executed. Conversely, if direct hire is used, it will take time to establish program parameters, establish support for the work, and hire for the position. This will cause a delay in services which directly impact people's well-being. Contracting would also provide greater access to those needed services by ensuring greater coverage levels. Coverage levels such as having evening coverage, weekend coverage, and access while an employee is on leave may be negotiated as part of a contract and would be more difficult to provide as a stand-alone Social Worker if it is a direct hire. Peer/professional support: Contracting with a human services agency allows the City to tap into the established structure and resources of that agency. A contracted Social Worker would have the support of an agency that is focused on human services with ready access to other social workers, support staff Q Packet Pg. 160 9.1.a and institutional support/resources. This directly translates into better services as the City does not have this established support network internally. A direct hire Social Worker would have less ready interaction with other social workers and/or support staff for networking, problem -solving, etc. and would have less readily available institutional support and access to support resources. Y L Supervision: Contracting for this service would provide the supervision that is needed for this type of 0 work. f° 0 Supervision comes in to play in two key areas. If the Social Worker is attempting to gain higher r licensure, then specific supervised hours must be achieved. If the Social Worker is at the highest level of U L licensure (LICSW) then a structure must be in place to review casework to ensure it is meeting o standards. v ui If the City were to direct hire, a way to provide supervised hours or casework auditing would need to be established. As the City currently does not have the structure to provide this, it would most likely need x to occur in the form of contracted supervision by a human services agency. This would be an additional L 0 cost that would take away money from program offerings. o Cost: Contracting for a dedicated social worker will be less costly than direct hire and will allow more >, program monies to be allocated to the Human Services program. As a direct hire the City would be M = Q responsible for all benefit costs as well as be liable for any employment related claims. Liability Considerations: The direct hire model creates more liability for both the City and those who would access services. With a direct hire Social Worker, documented interactions with clients could be partially/fully subject to public disclosure. If this work was contracted these interactions would be largely free from public disclosure requirements. If the City is providing direct health care services and, depending on if the City is conducting transactions for the services as defined by HIPAA, this may cause the City to become a covered entity under HIPAA which creates much more stringent security protocols for data, which can be very costly to implement. Currently, this type of work would be excluded from the City's liability coverage. A separate insurance policy would need to be purchased should the City direct hire a Social Worker who is engaging in casework. Contracting for this work would alleviate this need and would transfer risk to the contracted agency. Organizational Culture: If the Social Worker is contracted, it may take longer for this person to learn and embrace City of Edmonds institutional culture and expectations. This can be addressed by having the Social Worker "on -site" for the majority of their time, rather than at their agency. Additionally, Packet Pg. 161 9.1.a performance outcomes of the contracted person would need to be very clear so issues of performance management can be addressed to the City's satisfaction. Q Packet Pg. 162 9.1.b Peer/Professional Levels Support Considerations OrganizationalService The City does not have a Interactions with clients could Would need to address how to currently establish program so Would need to provide benefits be fully/partially subject to May come to understand more provide adequate coverage p G g the new hire would be entering g without an established which run a roximatl 32% of pp y public Disclosure. City liablit p y y readily Edmonds institutional with a single person. While "on into a blank slate with no program/structure the wages. Would need to take policy excludes this work so an culture and expectations. call" hours can be established support. This could slowdown necessary supervision would into account any ongoing costs additional policy would need to Would have only direct this would need to be serivice offerings as they would not be in place. Contract(s) related to union negotiations as be purchsed. An analysis would supervision and management negotiated and additional need to create relationships would most Ilkley need to be this is a covered position. need to be conducted to by the City, with no potential compensation would need to be and determine what technology executed to provide both Would be responsible for all determine if this work would for another agency's paid. Would be difficult to and other support is needed. It supervision and casework employment liability costs such result in the City becoming a managerial layer to affect cover time away (sick & may be more diffibult to tap auditing. as unemployment and worker's covered entity under HIPAA, vacation leave) into a peer network as astand- compensation which could result in costly performance, outcomes, etc. alone practitioner. secruity and privacy measures. Services should be able to start Peer/and professional support Would not have direct very soon after contract is network would alreay be Supervisory structure is already Would control costs through managerial control. Would executed. Would be able to established as well as in place. Casework auditing contract negotiations but would Liablity would be transferred if possibly have competing negotiate coverage for when technology and other support structure is alreay established. not have direct control of the work was contracted. cultural norms for the dedicated social worker is on wages for position. leave and for after hours access. services. organization. U 0 U) O V L C O - d L 2 v d L_ 4- 0 N N R C Q •L R C O N �L Q E O U a� O L d Y L O U 0 r c,> R Y a Packet Pg. 163 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/9/2021 Amendments to New Tree Regulations Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Citizens Housing Commission Preparer: Debbie Rothfus Background/History Stage 1 of updating the City's tree regulations has particularly focused on protecting trees on sites where development is happening, along with related issues, such as a Tree Fund. On March 2, the City Council made significant progress by adopting a new ordinance (see attached "Tree -Related Regulations") to put this into action. At the March 2 meeting, the City Council also reviewed a table of Stage 2 tree -related activities, which would be slated next. (See attachment for "Tree Work Upcoming".) Stage 2 includes developing tree regulations that apply to private properties not covered by regulations for development. During the last few months while the new tree -related regulations were being prepared, the Council adopted two interim ordinances (No. 4200 and No. 4201) strictly limiting options for tree removal on potential development sites. These interim ordinances would have expired March 10 but, at the Council's March 2 meeting, they were extended until March 24, while the City Council continued to consider amendments to the new tree regulations. Staff Recommendation Decide on amendment proposals to be included in an ordinance that would amend the new tree regulations. Narrative At the City Council's March 2 meeting, the Council adopted new tree regulations that particularly focused on protecting/retaining trees during development. The new regulations contained several changes from the prior version. (Note: The new tree regulations focus on development sites but tree regulations for other properties will be considered later.) Because the available time that evening did not allow all Council members to have amendment proposals considered, the Council concurred on revisiting the new tree regulations ordinance (first attachment) at the March 9 meeting and considering amendments. Any amendments supported by the Council majority will be included in an ordinance that comes back to the City Council for a final decision at its March 16 meeting. Such ordinance could be adopted as part of the Consent Agenda or by separate action. Attachments: Tree Related Regulations 3.4.21 Packet Pg. 164 9.2 Tree.Work.Upcoming Packet Pg. 165 9.2.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING PRIOR TREE CLEARING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING NEW TREE RELATED REGULATIONS, NEW CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN REGULATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW TREE FUND WHEREAS, the Planning Board has been reviewing draft tree regulations since September 2020, specifically at the September 9, October 14, October 28, November 12, and November 18 Planning Board meetings; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4200 (a moratorium on certain subdivision applications) and Ordinance 4201 (interim regulations to accompany the moratorium) on November 10, 2020 to preserve existing trees while the Planning Board completed its work; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the draft tree regulations on December 9, 2020 and completed its review on January 13, 2021 with a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council received an introduction to the draft tree regulations at the January 26, 2021 Council meeting and held a public hearing on February 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, the regulations adopted by this ordinance represent the city's initial stages of implementing the Urban Forest Management Plan that the City Council adopted in 2019; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 18.45 (Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is repealed in its entirety and replaced by a new Chapter 23.10 added to Title 23 (Natural Resources) of the Edmonds Community Development Code . The new chapter 23.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Tree Related Packet Pg. 166 9.2.a Regulations," is hereby added to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. A new Section 20.75.048 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Conservation Subdivision Design," is hereby added to read as set forth in Attachment B hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. A new chapter 3.95 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Tree Fund," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment C hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 4. The effectiveness of Ordinances 4200 and 4201 shall be extended to March 24 2021. Section 5. Emergency Declaration. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this ordinance take effect immediately upon passage, and that the same is not subject to a referendum. Ordinances 4200 and 4201 were adopted on November 10, 2020, were only intended to remain in effect for four months, and need to be repealed by ordinance. Without an immediate adoption of this interim zoning ordinance, Ordinances 4200 and 4201 would either last longer than intended or would expire before this ordinance could take effect. In the latter scenario, any delay in the effective date of this ordinance could allow developers to vest applications under the preexisting set of tree regulations. Therefore, this ordinance should be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring that all future development be governed by the new code. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth in Section 5, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is not adopted Packet Pg. 167 9.2.a by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the council, then Section 5 shall be disregarded, in which case, this ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 168 9.2.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING NEW TREE RELATED REGULATIONS, NEW CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN REGULATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW TREE FUND The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2021. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 M CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 169 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A Draft Tree Related Regulations 23.10.000 Intent and Purpose 23.10.010 Administration Authority 23.10.020 Definitions 23.10.030 Permits 23.10.040 Exemptions 23.10.050 Tree Removal Prohibited 23.10.060 Tree Retention Associated with Development Activity 23.10.070 Tree Protection Measures During Development 23.10.080 Tree Replacement 23.10.085 Protected Trees Notice on Title 23.10.090 Bonding 23.10.100 Violation, Enforcement and Penalties 23.10.110 Liability 20.75.048 Conservation Subdivision Design Flexibility Chapter 3.95 Tree Fund 23.10.000 Intent and Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish a process and standards to provide for the evaluation, protection, enhancement, preservation, replacement, and proper maintenance use of significant trees. This includes the following: A. Implement the goals and objectives of the City's Urban Forest Management Plan; B. Implement the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan; C. Implement the goals and objectives of the City's Climate Action Plan; D. Preserve, through design and intention, wildlife corridors and habitat; E. To promote the public health, safety, biodiversity, environmental health and general welfare of the residents of Edmonds, provide greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and preserve the physical and aesthetic character of the city through the prevention of indiscriminate removal or destruction of trees and ground cover on improved or partially improved property; F. Preserve the maximum number of trees that are determined to be appropriate for preservation in the Edmonds urban environment and that have a reasonable chance of long-term survival; G. Promote site planning, building, and development practices that work to avoid removal or destruction of trees and vegetation, that avoid unnecessary disturbance to the City's natural vegetation, and that provide landscaping to buffer the effects of built and paved areas; H. Encourage tree retention efforts by providing design flexibility with respect to certain development requirements; City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 1 of 15 Packet Pg. 170 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A Retain as many viable trees as possible on a developing site while still allowing the development proposal to move forward in a timely manner and replanting when trees are removed during of development. J. Promote building and site planning practices that are consistent with the city's natural topographic and vegetation features while recognizing that certain factors such as condition (e.g., disease, danger of falling, etc.), proximity to existing and proposed structures and improvements, interference with utility services, and the realization of a reasonable enjoyment of property may require the removal of certain trees and ground cover; and K. Mitigate the environmental and aesthetic consequences of tree removal in land development through on -site and off -site tree replacement to help achieve a goal of no net loss of tree canopy coverage throughout the City of Edmonds; 23.10.010 Administering Authority The development services director ("director") or a designee shall have the authority and responsibility to administer and enforce all provisions of this chapter. 23.10.020 Definitions A. Caliper — The American Association of Nurserymen standard for trunk measurement of nursery stock. Caliper of the trunk shall be the trunk diameter measured six (6) inches above the ground for up to and including 4-inch caliper size and 12 inches above the ground for larger sizes. B. Canopy — The leaves and branches of a tree from the lowest branch on the trunk to the top. C. Critical Root Zone - The area surrounding a tree at a distance from the trunk, which is equal to one (1) foot for every one (1) inch of tree DBH. D. Developable Site —The gross site area of a lot minus critical areas and buffers. E. Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) - The diameter or thickness of a tree trunk measured at 4.5 feet from the ground. DBH is also known as Diameter at Standard Height (DSH). F. Dripline - The distance from the tree trunk, that is equal to the furthest extent of the tree's crown. G. Hazard tree - A tree that is dead, dying, diseased, damaged, structurally defective or exposed by recent removal of adjacent trees which makes it subject to a high probability of failure as determined by a qualified tree professional. H. Grove —A group of three (3) or more significant trees with overlapping or touching crowns. I. Improved lot — means mean a lot or parcel of land upon which a structure(s) is located, and which cannot be further subdivided pursuant to city subdivision regulations and zoning code. J. Limits of disturbance means the boundary between the area of minimum protection around a tree and the allowable site disturbance. K. Native Tree — Native trees are described in the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) as being well -suited to our climate and tending to provide good habitat for local wildlife. The UFMP contains a partial list of species that are considered native trees. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 2 of 15 Packet Pg. 171 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A L. Nuisance Tree — is a tree that is causing significant physical damage to a private or public structures and/or infrastructure, including but not limited to: sidewalk, curb, road, water or sewer or stormwater utilities, driveway, parking lot, building foundation, or roof. M. Protected Tree — A tree identified for retention and protection on an approved tree retention plan, replacement in relation to a permit or plan, and/or permanently protected by easement, tract, or covenant restriction. N. Pruning- means the proper removal of roots or branches of a tree according to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 pruning standards. O. Qualified professional —An individual with relevant education and training in arboriculture or urban forestry, having two (2) or more of the following credentials: 1. International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist; 2. Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ) as established by the ISA TRAQ (or equivalent); 3. American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) registered Consulting Arborist; 4. Society of American Foresters (SAF) Certified Forester for Forest Management Plans; For tree retention associated with a development permit, a qualified professional must have, in addition to the above credentials, a minimum of three (3) years' experience working directly with the protection of trees during construction and have experience with the likelihood of tree survival after construction. A qualified professional must also be able to prescribe appropriate measures for the preservation of trees during land development. P. Significant Tree — A tree that is at least six (6) inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) as measured at 4.5 feet from the ground. For trees with multiple leaders at four and one-half (4.5) feet height, theDBH shall be the combined cumulative total of branches greater than six (6) inches diameter at four and one-half (4.5) feet above the average grade. If a tree has been removed and only the stump remains that is below four and one-half (4.5) feet tall, the size of the tree shall be the diameter of the top of the stump. Q. Specimen Tree — A tree of exceptional size or form for its species or rarity as determined by the city's qualified tree professional.. R. Tree - means a self-supporting woody plant characterized by one main trunk or, for certain species, multiple trunks, that is recognized as a tree in the nursery and arboricultural industries S. Tree Fund — refers to the fund created by Chapter 3.95 ECC. T. Tree removal — means the direct or indirect removal of a tree(s) or vegetation through actions including, but not limited to: clearing, cutting, girdling, topping, or causing irreversible damage to roots or stems; destroying the structural integrity of trees through improper pruning, unless pruning back to the point where the tree has been previously topped; poisoning; filling, excavating, grading, or trenching within the dripline that results in the loss of more than 20 percent of the tree's root system; or the removal through any of these processes of greater than 50 percent of the live crown of the tree. U. Tree topping - The significant cutting back of the leader stem or major branches, resulting in severely altering the growth potential of a tree. This definition does not apply when the sole purpose is to create a snag or snags for wildlife habitat. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 3 of 15 Packet Pg. 172 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A V. Viable tree - A significant tree that a qualified professional has determined to be in good health, with a low risk of failure due to structural defects, is windfirm if isolated or remains as part of a grove, and is a species that is suitable for its location. 23.10.030 Permits A. Applicability: No person shall remove, excessively prune, or top any significant tree except as provided by this chapter. B. Tree removal not specifically exempted in section 23.10.040 will be processed as a Type I permit. C. Procedural exemption. Tree removal associated with building permit, subdivision, or other land use approval will be reviewed with the associated project and will not require a separate tree removal permit. All clearing shall be consistent with and apply the standards established by this chapter. 23.10.040 Exemptions The following activities are exempt from the provisions of this chapter and do not require a permit A. Removal of trees on an improved single-family lot, except for: That portion of the property containing a critical area or its associated buffer. Critical area in this context does not include erosion hazards with slopes less than 25 percent. B. Removal of non -significant trees that are not protected by any other means. C. Removal of trees by the public works department, parks department, fire department and or franchised utilities for one of the following purposes: Installation and maintenance of public utilities or motorized or non -motorized streets or paths 2. In response to situations involving danger to life or property, substantial fire hazards, or interruption of services provided by a utility. Franchised utilities shall provide notification to the City prior to tree maintenance or removal. A separate right-of-way permit may be required. D. Removal and maintenance of trees within City of Edmonds' parks at the direction of the Parks Department. E. Routine landscaping and maintenance of vegetation, such as pruning and planting, removal of invasive/exotic species, management of brush and seedling trees. Pruning should comply with ANSI A300 (Part 1— 2017), Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management — Standard Practices, to maintain long term health. This includes maintenance of trees and vegetation required to be retained or planted under the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Pruning existing trees back to the point where they have been previously topped is considered maintenance for these trees alone provided pruning will be undertaken only to the extent necessary for public safety or tree health. F. Trees that do not meet the exemptions in subsections A through E of this section may be removed with supporting documentation: City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 4 of 15 Packet Pg. 173 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A a. Nuisance tree with documentation of the damage and any tree work that has been attempted to rectify the nuisance, and/or a statement from the applicant's qualified tree professional explaining why no arboricultural practices can safely rectify the nuisance. b. Hazard tree located outside a critical area with a tree risk assessment prepared by the applicants qualified professional documenting how the tree meets the definition of a hazard tree. c. Hazard tree removal in a critical area or critical area buffers consistent with the requirements of ECDC 23.40.220.C.8 23.10.050 Tree Removal Prohibited A. Protected Trees: Removal of protected trees is prohibited, except as provided for in ECDC 23.10.040.E Hazard and Nuisance Trees, or through an approved modification of a Landscape Plan B. Vacant Lots: Removal of trees from a vacant lot prior to a project development is prohibited except as provided for in ECDC 23.10.040.F, hazard and nuisance trees. C. Demolition of Structures: Tree removal shall be prohibited as part of a permitted demolition except as required to reasonably conduct demolition activities subject to approval of the director. Tree replacement may be required for removed trees. D. In critical areas, critical area buffers, and in all native growth protection easements, tree removal is prohibited except as allowed per Chapters 23.40 — 23.90 ECDC. 23.10.060 Tree Retention Associated with Development Activity A. Introduction. The City's objective is to retain as many viable trees as possible on a developing site while still allowing the development proposal to move forward in a timely manner. To that end, the City requires approval of a tree retention and protection plan in conjunction with the following applications: 1. Short subdivision 2. Subdivision 3. New multi -family development 4. New single-family development on a vacant lot or a demolition and replacement of a single- family house, and 5. Any tree removal on developed sites not exempted by ECDC 23.10.040. In order to make better decisions about tree retention, particularly during all stages of development, tree retention plans will require specific information about the existing trees before removal is allowed. Specific tree retention plan review standards provided in this section establish tree retention priorities, incentives, and variations to development standards in order to facilitate preservation of viable trees. B. Tree Retention Plan City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 174 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A 1. An applicant for a development identified in subsection A must submit a tree retention plan that complies with this section. A qualified professional may be required to prepare certain components of a tree retention plan at the applicant's expense. Tree Retention Plan Components. The tree retention plan shall contain the following information, unless waived by the director: a. A tree inventory containing the following: A number system of all existing significant trees on the subject property (with corresponding tags on trees); Size (DBH) and estimated tree crown diameter; iii. Proposed tree status (trees to be removed or retained); iv. Brief general health or condition rating of trees (i.e.: poor, fair, good, excellent, etc.) V. Tree type or species. b. A site plan depicting the following: Location of all proposed improvements, including building footprint, access, utilities, applicable setbacks, buffers, and required landscaped areas clearly identified. If a short subdivision or subdivision is being proposed and the location of all proposed improvements has not yet been established, a phased tree retention plan review is required as described in subsection (3)(a) of this section; Accurate location of significant trees on the subject property and adjacent properties where the canopy and/or critical root zone of adjacent significant trees extend onto the subject property (surveyed locations may be required). iii. Trees labeled corresponding to the tree inventory numbering system; iv. Location of tree protection measures; V. Indicate limits of disturbance drawn to scale around all trees potentially impacted by site disturbances resulting from grading, demolition, or construction activities; vi. Proposed tree status (trees to be removed or retained) noted by an `X' or by ghosting out; vii. Proposed locations of any required replacement trees as outlined in ECDC 23.10.080 and trees required to be planted in accordance with ECDC 23.10.060.C.5. c. An arborist report containing the following: A complete description of each tree's health, condition, and viability; A description of the method(s) used to determine the limits of disturbance (i.e., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case -by -case basis description for individual trees); iii. Any special instructions specifically outlining any work proposed within the limits of the disturbance protection area (i.e., hand -digging, tunneling, root pruning, any grade changes, clearing, monitoring, and aftercare); iv. For trees not viable for retention, a description of the reason(s) for removal based on poor health, high risk of failure due to structure, defects, unavoidable isolation City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 175 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A (windfirmness), or unsuitability of species, etc., and for which no reasonable alternative action is possible must be given (pruning, cabling, etc.); V. Description of the impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove; 3. Additional Tree Retention Plan Standards for Short Subdivisions and Subdivisions a. Phased Review i. If during the short subdivision or subdivision review process the location of all proposed improvements, including the building footprint, utilities, and access, have not yet been established, the applicant may submit a Tree Retention Plan that addresses the current phase of development and limits removal to the impacted areas. A new Tree Retention Plan shall be required at each subsequent phase of the project as more information about the location of the proposed improvements is known subject to all of the requirements in this section. C. Tree Retention Requirements General Tree Retention Requirements: Significant trees on lots proposed for development or redevelopment shall be retained as follows: ECDC 23.10.060.0 Tree Retention Requirements for Proposed Development Development Retention Required New single-family, short subdivision, or 30% of all significant trees in the developable subdivision site Multi -family development, unit lot short 25% of all significant trees in the developable subdivision, or unit lot subdivision site 2. Trees that are located within Native Growth Protection Areas, critical areas and their associated buffers, or that have otherwise been designated for protection shall not be removed except as provide for ECDC 23.10.040.E hazard and nuisance trees and ECDC 23.40.220.C.8 critical area hazard tree. 3. The director may require the retention of additional trees to meet the stated purpose and intent of this chapter, as required by the critical area regulations (Chapters 23.40 — 23.90 ECDC), or the Shoreline Master Program (Title 24 ECDC) or as site -specific conditions demand using SEPA substantive authority. 4. Every significant tree that is removed under this chapter must be replaced consistent with the requirements of ECDC 23.10.080. 5. For developing properties identified in ECDC 23.10.060.A that have fewer than three significant trees, trees shall be retained and/or planted that will result in the site having at least three trees, which will be significant at maturity, per 8,000 square feet of lot area. D. Priority of Tree Retention Requirements: Significant trees to be retained should be retained in the following order of priority: 1. Priority One: City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 7 of 15 Packet Pg. 176 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A a. Specimen trees; b. Significant trees which form a continuous canopy; c. Significant trees on slope greater than 15 percent; d. Significant trees adjacent to critical areas and their associated buffers; and e. Significant trees over sixty (60) feet in height or greater than eighteen (18) inches DBH. 2. Priority Two: a. Healthy tree groupings whose associated undergrowth can be preserved; b. Trees within the required yard setbacks or around the perimeter; c. Trees that have a screening function or provide relief from glare, blight, or commercial development; d. Other significant native evergreen or deciduous trees; and e. Other significant nonnative trees. 3. Priority Three: Alders and cottonwoods shall be retained when all other trees have been evaluated for retention and are not able to be retained except where adjacent to open space, wetlands or creek buffers. E. In considering trees for retention, applicants and the City shall avoid, to the extent known, the selection of trees that may become hazardous because of wind gusts, including trees adjacent to utility corridors where falling trees may cause power outages or other damage. Remaining trees may be susceptible to blowdowns because of loss of a buffer from other trees, grade changes affecting the tree health and stability, and/or the presence of buildings in close proximity. 23.10.070 Tree Protection Measures During Development Prior to development activity or initiating tree removal on the site, vegetated areas, individual trees and soil to be preserved shall be protected from potentially damaging activities pursuant to the following standards: A. Preconstruction Meeting Required. Prior to the commencement of any permitted clearing and grading activity, a preconstruction meeting shall be held on site with the permittee and appropriate City staff. The project site shall be marked in the field as follows 1. The extent of clearing and grading to occur; 2. Delineation and protection of any critical areas and critical area buffers with clearing limit fencing; 3. Flagging of trees to be removed and tags on trees to be retained; and 4. Property lines B. Placing Materials near Trees. No person may conduct any activity within the protected area of any tree designated to remain, including, but not limited to, operating or parking equipment, placing solvents, storing building material or stockpiling any materials, or dumping concrete washout or City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 177 9.2.a ATTACHMENT A other chemicals. During construction, no person shall attach any object to any tree designated for protection. C. Protective Barrier. Before development, land clearing, grading, filling or any land alteration, the applicant shall: 1. Erect and maintain readily visible temporary protective tree fencing along the limits of disturbance which completely surrounds the protected area of all retained trees, groups of trees, vegetation and native soil. Tree protective fencing shall be a minimum height of three feet, visible and of durable construction; orange polyethylene laminar fencing is acceptable. 2. Install highly visible signs spaced no further than 15 feet apart along the entirety of the protective tree fencing. Said sign must be approved by the director and shall state at a minimum "Tree and Soil Protection Area, Entrance Prohibited" and provide the City phone number for code enforcement to report violations. 3. Prohibit excavation or compaction of soil or other potentially damaging activities within the barriers; provided, that the director may allow such activities approved by a qualified professional and under the supervision of a qualified professional retained and paid for by the applicant. 4. Maintain the protective barriers in place for the duration of the project until the director authorizes their removal. 5. Ensure that any approved landscaping done in the protected zone subsequent to the removal of the barriers shall be accomplished with machinery from outside the protected zone or by hand. 6. In addition to the above, the director may require the following: a. If equipment is authorized to operate within the protected zone, the soil and critical root zone of a tree must be covered with mulch to a depth of at least six (6) inches or with plywood, steel plates or similar material in order to protect roots and soil from damage caused by heavy equipment. b. Minimize root damage by hand -excavating a 2-foot-deep trench, at edge of critical root zone, to cleanly sever the roots of trees to be retained. Never rip or shred roots with heavy equipment. c. Corrective pruning performed on protected trees in order to avoid damage from machinery or building activity. d. Maintenance of trees throughout construction period by watering and fertilizing. D. Grade. 1. The grade shall not be elevated or reduced within the critical root zone of trees to be preserved without the director's authorization based on recommendations from a qualified professional. The director may allow coverage of up to one-half (1/2) of the area of the tree's critical root zone with light soils (no clay) to the minimum depth necessary to carry out grading or landscaping plans, if it will not imperil the survival of the tree. Aeration devices may be required to ensure the tree's survival. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 178 ATTACHMENT A 9.2.a 2. If the grade adjacent to a preserved tree is raised such that it could slough or erode into the tree's critical root zone, it shall be permanently stabilized to prevent soil erosion and suffocation of the roots. 3. The applicant shall not install an impervious surface within the critical root zone of any tree to be retained without the authorization of the director. The director may require specific construction methods and/or use of aeration devices to ensure the tree's survival and to minimize the potential for root -induced damage to the impervious surface. 4. To the greatest extent practical, utility trenches shall be located outside of the critical root zone of trees to be retained. The director may require that utilities be tunneled under the roots of trees to be retained if the director determines that trenching would significantly reduce the chances of the tree's survival. 5. Trees and other vegetation to be retained shall be protected from erosion and sedimentation Clearing operations shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible time. To control erosion, it is encouraged that shrubs, ground cover and stumps be maintained on the individual lots, where feasible. 6. The director may approve the use of alternative tree protection techniques if those techniques provide an equal or greater degree of protection than the techniques listed in this subsection. E. Directional Felling. Directional felling of trees shall be used to avoid damage to trees designated for retention. Additional Requirements. The director may require additional tree protection measures that are consistent with accepted urban forestry industry practices. 23.10.080 Tree Replacement A. Replacement required. Tree replacement is required for tree cutting permits required by this chapter and/or for tree removal associated with the development types identified in ECDC 23.10.060.A. Each significant tree to be removed shall be replaced as follows: 1. For each significant tree between 6 inches and 10 inches DBH removed, one (1) replacement tree is required. For each significant tree between 10.1 inches and 14 inches in DBH removed, two (2) replacement trees are required. For each significant tree greater than 14 inches in DBH removed, three (3) replacement trees are required. B. No tree replacement is required in the following cases: The tree is hazardous, dead, diseased, injured, or in a declining condition with no reasonable assurance of regaining vigor. 2. The tree is proposed to be relocated to another suitable planting site, provided that relocation complies with the standards in this section. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 10 of 15 Packet Pg. 179 ATTACHMENT A 9.2.a C. Prior to any tree removal, the applicant shall demonstrate through a tree protection and replacement plan, critical area mitigation plan, or other plans acceptable to the director that tree replacement will meet the minimum standards of this section. D. Replacement Specifications. 1. Minimum sizes for replacement trees shall be: a. one -and -one -half -inch caliper for deciduous trees; b. Six feet in height for evergreen trees. 2. The director may consider smaller -sized replacement trees if the applicant can demonstrate that smaller trees are more suited to the species, the site conditions, and the purposes of this section, and that such trees will be planted in sufficient quantities to meet the intent of this section. 3. Replacement trees shall be primarily native species. E. Tree Replacement Fee -in -lieu. A fee -in -lieu of tree replacement may be allowed, subject to approval by the director after consideration of all other options. A tree replacement fee shall be required for each replacement tree required but not planted on the application site or an off -site location. 1. The amount of the fee shall be $1000 multiplied by the number of trees necessary to satisfy the tree replacement requirements of this section and shall be deposited into the City's Tree Fund. The fee shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit or associated development permit. 23.10.085 Protected Trees Notice on Title The owner of any property that included a tree(s) identified for retention and protection on an approved tree retention plan, replacement in relation to a permit or plan, and/or permanently protected by easement, tract, or covenant restriction shall, as a condition of permit issuance, record a notice on title of the existence of such protected trees against the property with the Snohomish County auditor's office. The notice shall be approved by the director and the city attorney for compliance with this provision. 23.10.090 Bonding A. The director may require a performance bond for tree replacement and site restoration to ensure the installation of replacement trees, and/or compliance with other landscaping requirements as identified on the approved site plans. B. The bond shall be in the amount of 120 percent of the estimated cost of implementation of the tree replacement and/or site restoration including trees, irrigation and labor. C. A two-year maintenance bond shall be required after the installation of required site improvements and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or finalization of permit and following required landscape installation or tree replacement. The maintenance bond shall be in place to ensure adequate maintenance and protection of retained trees and site improvements. The City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 180 ATTACHMENT A 9.2.a maintenance bond shall be for an amount of 15% of the performance bond or estimate in subsection B. D. The director shall exempt individual single-family lots from a maintenance bond, except where a clearing violation has occurred or tree replacement is located within critical areas or critical area buffers. 23.10.100 Violation, Enforcement and Penalties A. Noncompliance with any section of this chapter constitutes a violation of this Code. A violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as provided in Chapter 5.50 ECC. C. Penalties: Aiding or Abetting: Any person who, through an act of commission or omission, procures, aids or abets in the violation shall be considered to have committed a violation for the purposes of the penalty. All persons who have been found to commit a violation under this chapter shall be responsible for an equal share of any penalties imposed under subsection C.2. Civil Penalties: Any person violating any provisions of this chapter shall have committed a civil infraction and may be subject to civil penalties in addition to any criminal penalties. Pursuant to Chapter 64.12 RCW, the City may be entitled to triple the amount of civil damages claimed or assessed. The extent of the penalty shall be determined according to one or more of the following: a. An amount reasonably determined by the Director to be equivalent to the costs estimated by the City to investigate and administer the infraction; b. The economic benefit that the violator derives from the violation (as measured by the greater of the resulting increase in market value of the property or the value received by the violator or savings of construction costs realized by the violator performing any act in violation of this chapter); Removal of existing 12" diameter or larger trees in violation of this chapter will require an appraisal of the tree value by the city tree protection professional using trunk formula method in the current edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal. The cost of the appraisal shall be paid by the person(s) who removed existing trees in violation of this chapter. Penalty for illegal removal of trees shall be $1,500 per tree less than 12" Diameter and the appraised value of trees 12" or more in diameter. Penalties shall be paid into the city Tree Fund. If diameter of removed tree is unknown, determination of the diameter size shall be made by the City Arborist by comparing size of stump and species to similar trees in similar growing conditions. The cost of replacing and replanting the trees and restoring the disturbed area according to a specific plan approved by the City. Violators of this chapter or of a permit issued thereunder shall be responsible for restoring unlawfully damaged areas in conformance with a plan, approved by the Director, that provides for repair of any environmental and property damage, and restoration of the site; and which results in a site condition that, to City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 12 of 15 Packet Pg. 181 ATTACHMENT A 9.2.a the greatest extent practical, is equivalent to the site condition that would have existed in the absence of the violation(s). If illegal tree topping has occurred, the property owner shall be required to have a certified arborist develop and implement a five (5) year pruning schedule in addition to monetary fines and required tree replacement. Civil penalties under this section shall be imposed by a notice in writing, either by certified mail with return receipt requested or by personal service, to the person incurring the same from the City. The notice shall describe the violation, approximate the date(s) of violation, and shall order the acts constituting the violation to cease and desist, or, in appropriate cases, require necessary corrective action within a specific time. 4. Any fiscal penalty recovered under this section shall be deposited in the City's tree fund as established in Chapter 3.95 ECC. 23.10.110 Liability A. Liability for any adverse impacts, damages or injury resulting from work performed in accordance with any permit issued by the city under ECDC 23.10.030 shall be the sole responsibility of the permit applicant and/or owner of the property or site for which the permit was issued, and shall not be the responsibility of the city of Edmonds. Issuance by the city of any permit under this chapter shall not be construed as an assumption of any risk or liability by the city of Edmonds, nor as a warranty or guarantee that the work authorized by the permit will have no adverse impact or will cause no damages or injury to any person or property. B. Issuance by the city of a permit under ECDC 23.20.030 and/or compliance by the applicant and/or property owner with any permit conditions therein shall not relieve an applicant and/or property owner from any responsibility otherwise imposed by law for any adverse impacts, injury or damage to persons or property resulting from the work authorized by any permit issued under this chapter. C. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to relieve any property owner within the city limits from the duties imposed under Chapter 9.25 ECC to keep any tree or vegetation upon his property or under his control in such condition as to prevent it from constituting a hazard or a nuisance. D. The amount of any security required as part of any land development permit with which tree removal is associated shall not serve as a gauge or limit to the compensation that may be owed by a property owner as a result of injury or damages to persons or property resulting from any tree removal authorized under this chapter. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 13 of 15 Packet Pg. 182 ATTACHMENT B 9.2.a 20.75.048 Conservation Subdivision Design A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote retention of significant trees or specimen trees and to protect natural resources through some amount of flexibility in lot layouts of subdivisions in order to preserve trees and provide for low impact development. The director and the applicant shall work in good faith to find reasonable solutions. Applicability. Administrative design flexibility in residential zones is limited to the following development standards: 1. Setbacks. Street, side and rear setbacks may be reduced in all residential zones provided that: a. No street setback shall be less than fifteen (15) feet; b. No rear setback shall be less the ten (10) feet; c. No required side setback shall be less than five (5) feet; and d. Street and Rear setbacks in the RSW-12 zone shall not be reduced. Lot size and width. Lots within a subdivision may be clustered in a way that allows dwelling units to be shifted to the most suitable locations potentially reducing individual lot sizes and widths, provided that the overall density of the project complies with the density requirements of the zoning district in which it is located. Coverage. Structural coverage may be increased on individual lots provided that, in total, coverage of the area within the subdivision does not exceed the lot coverage allow required for the zoning district in which it is located. 4. Access. Variations in parking lot design and/or access driveway requirements may be granted when the public works, fire and planning officials determine the variations to be consistent with the intent of city codes and standards. C. Properties which include trees that are identified for retention and protection is association with design flexibility approved under this section must record a notice on title consistent with ECDC 23.10.085. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 183 ATTACHMENT C 9.2.a 3.95 Tree Fund 3.95.010 Tree Fund Established There is hereby created and established a fund known as the "Tree Fund." 3.95.020 Funding Sources Monies for the Tree Fund shall come from the following sources: A. All revenue, mitigation fees, civil fines, and penalties received by the city under Chapter 23.10 ECDC. B. All civil penalties received under Chapter 23.40 ECDC. C. Donations and grants for tree purposes; and D. Other monies allocated by the City Council 3.95.040 Funding Purposes A. Monies in the Tree Fund maybe used for the following purposes, as reviewed and approved by the city: 1. Providing tree vouchers to individuals purchasing and planting trees in the City of Edmonds; 2. Paying for services provided by a qualified tree professional; 3. Paying for services that support the urban forest management and health; 4. Acquiring, maintaining, and preserving wooded areas within the city; 5. Purchasing supplies and materials for the city's observance of Arbor Day or other educational purchases; 6. Other purposes relating to trees as determined by the city. B. Monies from the Tree Fund must not be used to purchase trees required for replacement under the conditions Chapter 23.10 ECDC, nor used to purchase trees required for replacement under the conditions of a violation. Further, they cannot be used in any manner that will profit the grantee. C. Monies deposited into the tree fund for a fee -in -lieu of tree replacements as provided for in ECDC 23.10.080.E must be used to purchase trees for planting. City Council Adopted March 2, 2021 Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 184 9.2.b Proposed 3/2/20 UPCOMING TREE -RELATED ITEMS & TIMING ITEM Q2 2021 Q3 2021 Inventory of downtown street trees Inventory of other public trees Street Tree Plan update Tree canopy assessment Heritage Tree Program Tree Canopy goal Assessment of staffing & other resource needs Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions Exploration of other incentive programs Open space acquisition Tree retention on private property (not related to development) Partnerships with other organizations Annual reports on City tree activities Tree give-away program View corridors Wildlife & habitat corridors Expanded public education & information Stormwater & Watershed Analysis Other tree -related issues Q4 2021 2022 or TBD Q Packet Pg. 185