ENG GEO TECH REPORT• Group Northwest, Inc.
July 24, 2017
Mr. Steve Lovell
8312 Talbot Road
Edmonds, Washington 98026
ritme0nical Engineers. Geologists
& Enviroammw spocialiw
G-3384
Subject: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF TIERED MODULAR BLOCK WALLS
8312 TALBOT ROAD, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
Dear Mr. Lovell.
GEO Group Northwest, Inc. has completed its geotechnical inspection and evaluation activities
regarding your construction of tiered modular block walls at the above -subject location in
Edmonds, Washington.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a residential lot on which you have been constructing a series of tiered
modular block walls in the upward -sloping rear yard area.
We visited the site on June 16, 2017, and met with you to discuss and evaluate the constriction
of the walls. We observed that much of the construction has been completed, and that a limited
amount of block and backfill placement remained to be done. We also reviewed photographs
that you had taken during your construction of the walls. These photographs showed the
placement of the blocks, drain pipe and drainage zone behind the blocks, geogrid layers, and
backfill placement and compaction. We also reviewed the recommendations in the geotechnical
engineering report prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc. dated June 12, 2006, regarding the walls
and the on -site project plans for the walls.
We observed that the walls had heights of 4 feet or less, and that the horizontal distance between
the wall tiers typically was 4 feet. We noted that there is one area where the horizontal spacing
11705 Bea -Red Road, Belk: uc. 14 . ,h ! e!"n SJsi ON
Phone 425/649-6757 Fax 425i044-s 58
July 24, 2017 G-3384
Mr. Steve Lovell Page 2
was approximately 3 feet. This area is located between the top two tiers in an area where the
walls have a pronounced nearly U-shaped concave -inward curvature, forming a local, narrow
promontory. This feature imposes significantly less load than a typical tier or backslope, because
of its limited width as measured perpendicular to the face of the walls.
During our visit, we reviewed photographs that you had taken during your construction of the
walls. These photographs showed the placement of the blocks, drain pipe and drainage zone
behind the blocks, geogrid layers, and backfill placement and compaction. We also reviewed the
recommendations in the geotechnical engineering report prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc.
dated June 12, 2006, regarding the walls and the on -site project plans for the walls.
We observed that backfill behind the zone of drain rock consisted of sandy site soils. We probed
the exposed fills by using a 0.5"-diameter steel T-bar probing rod. Based on our probing, we
found the fills to typically be competent and medium dense in condition, except in a few
locations where we were able to probe to depths ranging between 6 and 12 inches. We
recommended that these area be moistened and compacted further by using a large plate
compactor, and then be checked again.
On June 26, 2017, we re -visited the site and met with you to update our observations and
evaluation of the backfill that we recommended be further compacted. You informed us that the
areas had been moistened and re -compacted using a large plate compactor per our
recommendation, and we observed imprints from compaction on the exposed fills. We probed
these areas and found them to be competent and medium dense to dense in condition.
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our observations, it is our opinion that the tiered modular block walls have been
constructed in an adequate manner that is consistent with the recommendations in the Liu &
Associates geotechnical report referenced herein, with which we concur, and the plans we
reviewed during our visits. It is also our opinion that the walls present minimal risk to the
stability of the site and adjacent property.
LINUTATIONS
Our findings and recommendations stated herein are based on field observations, our experience
and judgment. The recommendations are our professional opinion derived in a manner
consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area and within the budget
GEO Group Northwest, Inc.
J
July 24,2017 G-3384
Mr. Steve Lovell Page 3
constraint. No warranty is expressed or implied. In the event that site conditions not anticipated
in this letter are encountered during construction, GEO Group Northwest, Inc. should be notified
and the above conclusions and recommendations should be re-evaluated, and revised where
appropriate.
CLOSING
If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC.
Keith Johnson
Project Geologist
r '
William Chang. PE V
Principal Engineer
`'jsed Geo,-
KEIT'H A. JOHNSON
GEO Group Northwest, Inc.