Loading...
Nuisance tree removal STF2021-0007CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION `ne. 18y%J April 26, 2021 Sean and Renee Drew 17715 Talbot Road Edmonds, WA 98026 reneedal@hotmail.com Subject: Nuisance Tree Removal 17715 Talbot Road Dear Mr. and Mrs. Drew, Information has been submitted to City of Edmonds regarding the removal of a maple tree on your property located at 17715 Talbot Road. The tree has a diameter at breast height (DBH) of at least 24 inches and thus is subject to the emergency ordinance for landmark trees adopted under Ordinance No. 4217. Ordinance No. 4217 only allows the removal of landmark trees outside of the development review process if the tree is a hazard tree or nuisance tree as defined by Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.10.020.G and 23.10.020.K. Ordinance No. 4218 adopted new tree code in Chapter 23.10 ECDC which included the documentation required for the removal of hazard and nuisance trees ECDC 23.10.040.F. For nuisance trees, ECDC 23.10.040.F.a provides: Nuisance tree with documentation of the damage and any tree work that has been attempted to rectify the nuisance, and/or a statement from the applicant's qualified tree professional explaining why no arboricultural practices can safely rectify the nuisance. An arborist report dated April 2, 2021 provides photos of the tree and the damage the tree is causing to the driveway (attached) along with a description that root pruning is not an option as that would compromise tree health and destabilize the tree. The tree appears to be a nuisance tree as defined by ECDC 23.10.020.K and may be removed. ECDC 23.10.080 requires all significant trees removed to be replaced at a ratio determined by the DBH of the tree being removed. Since the subject nuisance tree is greater the 14 inches, it is required to be replaced at a ratio of three to one. ECDC 23.10.080.D notes the size of replacement trees must be 1.5 inch caliper for deciduous species and six feet in height for evergreen species. The removal of the nuisance tree is approved with the following conditions: 1. This approval only pertains only to the nuisance tree identified in the attached April 2, 2021 arborist report. 2. A minimum of three replacement trees must be planted. Native species are preferred as indicated in ECDC 23.10.080.D.3. 3. Replacement trees must be planted within one year of removal of the hazard trees. Please notify the City once the replacement trees have been replanted for an inspection. 4. Trees shall be fell onto private property. 5. Vehicles and equipment shall be located on private property. Should it be necessary to utilize any portion of the City right-of-way, including the street or sidewalk, to perform any of this work then the contractor shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way construction permit in advance of starting work. A traffic control plan will be required as part of the right-of-way permit application. 6. Contractor/owner is responsible for keeping all debris on site and preventing any silt laden runoff from leaving the site and/or entering the city storm system. 7. Contractor/owner shall repair/replace any damaged sections of curb/gutter, sidewalk or other public improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project. 8. Contractor/owner is responsible for locating all on -site utilities and any utilities on neighboring properties that could be impacted by the tree removal. Relocation/revision/repair to any utilities may require separate permit. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions at kernen.lien@edmondswa.gov, or 425-771-0220. Sincerely, Kernen Lien Environmental Programs Manager cc: Jennifer Wells, Washington Tree Experts Drew (Edmonds) April 2, 2021 Page 1 of 4 To: Client name Street: City, Zip: Re: Washington Tree Experts 9792 Edmonds Way #123 Edmonds, WA 98020 206-362-3380 wtetree@yahoo.com Department of Planning City of Edmonds Sean and Renee Drew 17715 Talbot Rd. Edmonds, WA 98026 RECEIVED Apr 07 2021 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Bigleaf maple (Acer mocrophyllum) = 37" diameter at standard height This letter accompanies the application to remove a nuisance maple tree located north of the driveway. Conditions of concern (see attached photos): The bigleaf Maple tree located next to the driveway is of normal health and vigor. There is a moderate overall risk of failure. Tree has surface roots that have caused significant damage to the driveway. The client is seeking to repair the drive and to do so the roots will have to be removed. The driveway is located in the critical root zone of the large tree. Cutting roots in this area will be detrimental to tree health and stability. If the roots are left intact the driveway will be damaged again in the near future from ever expanding surface and structural roots. Recommendations: Unfortunately, root pruning will not mitigate damage to the driveway without compromising the tree health and stability. Remove tree as approved by governing agency. The removal of the tree will not adversely affect the adjacent trees. We use methods from the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for tree risk assessment while looking at the overall health of the trees and site conditions. In examining each tree, we look at such factors as: -size -vigor -root health Washington Tree Experts Certified Arborist Drew (Edmonds) April 2, 2021 Page 2 of 4 -crown health -deadwood and hanging branches -pest and disease While no one can predict with absolute certainty if a tree will or will not fail, we can, by using scientific process assess which of the trees is most likely to fail and take appropriate action. Prepared by Jennifer Wells Certified Arborist #PN6209A ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Waiver of Liability This information represents the tree health assessment at this point in time. My findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. Information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. The inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. Our fee is in no way contingent upon a result or occurrence of a subsequent event, or upon any finding to be reported. Attachments Site map Photos Application Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Washington Tree Experts Certified Arborist Drew (Edmonds) April 2, 2021 Page 3 of 4 Site map (not to scale for illustration purposes) City of Edmonds GISMap N = nuisance bigleaf maple Washington Tree Experts Certified Arborist .r _ t t y�� Target zone m E Occupancy rate 1-rare ,ti, $ °' e ° m ; t Target description Target protection s V m o, x 14 Lr,2-occasionah .4 3-frequent L l� Fin r a 4-constant a C Z 4 History of failures Topography Flat�RSloi Site changes NoneAGrade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology Root cuts Describe Soil conditions Limited volume ❑ Saturated ❑ Shallow ❑ Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots ❑ % Describe Prevailing wind directionS; V� Common weather Strong wind5XIce ❑ Snow❑ Heavyrainv Describe % Aspect Vigor Low ❑ Normal ❑ High ❑ Foliage None (seasonai)A None (dead) ❑ Normal Chlorotic % Necrotic Pests/Biotic Abiotic Species failure profile Branches Trunk❑ Roots❑ Describe Windexposure Protected[] Partial Full❑ Windfunneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium[] Large Crown density Sparse❑ Normal Dense❑ Interior branches Few❑ Normal Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or expected change in load factors 1 h. tip . % tl -- Crown and Branches -- Unbalanced crown ❑ LCIR % Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches ❑ %overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Brolden/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Over -extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned K Thinned Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark[] Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Tapped Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Z k V �oxjs Condition (s) of concern Part Size 1r Fail Distance -Q Q Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ ModeratelK Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible irobable ❑ imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible Probable Cl Imminent ❑ —Trunk — __ — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missingbark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ ConkslMushrooms Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Gaits/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze 0 Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms [] Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots D Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper l] Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean " Corrected? f\ ON( Response growth Response growth Conditions) of concern Conditions) of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ ModerateX Significant C] road on defect N/A 0 Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure improbable❑ Possible ,( Probable CI Imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable 0 Imminent ❑ NqP I of 2 Matrix /. Likelihood matrix. ��IIho�F tlk�llhaa�# b�trr,� - iof l�aiirire;W 1fe km+r { c�er Mom h li±rt�babi ilnrtifee _ .': tn>ily eretivlritltkIy. ` _ f r :P+oi:slble ° [1ttlrke - ' UATi1ce I S1i%el .: tmeau at # Iirrprsttia l�,n�±keiy .. Ilrrlikrs; {liitlkel {3nl"' MatrixZ Risk rating matrix. fritrre 8�'pact ftg Minoogd€tcant {jy tioyr 1dFaierak k l:�tEi3errte . t'. lik t _ lr u i rite pal =: #xliv. l tsurideraie. Notes, explanations, descriptions Mitt tion options I. d ` ' # '� `VV Ql\ Residual risk 2. Residual risk s. Residual risk a. Residual risk Overall tree risk rating f low ❑ Moderate High ❑ Extreme ❑ Overall residual risk None ® low ❑ Moderate ❑ High ❑ Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval Data 0 Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed XNo ❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations yNone DVisibility ❑Access ❑Vines []Root collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ESA) — 2017 Page 2 Of 2 CKV Of Edmonds hand U" Application TWIN 14 clr,�lga�v* ht.wtin, Rax*.r R �► U st HR Aiq\rWr \( F(aR4\ttvtx\ LOT StAtr� T11\ eePt �A__V*i,RatV �t "f•Rl\tSiTtlIT,TI\t h!x!tkpAmk (n►\I!\1 `%W*Ft mt Ptttaa(T X OTNFII Nu�� ,A�MFxtTrTTt>\ ttow fit t a Ht.\atst(t 1i lets Uuq it. lit — AUN cc e hcasr.wrr rtt(> .� 1"so"an aAy+rrr�n \.tva Ita(y� NAA 1771 S Tar4o R �s!►N!s ►Nr (rrt a vtus r(t rt �t n et t Lan. Arr"cA"t! 8 Ow,"nfiffir of !!!� PaOPaaTn a Staan alto Re ArmaM 17715 T tatl�y -� E-ltAq 1sl>aedal shot Road Pthwt a 20b3_ Aotrnail-corn TAX A(t xxt a Q�000047pp FAx e - � �IPTTON OF-., F PRO16(-T oR PtNTr'oaeo tlse Stir. - Up Uti.. ag Oft *t"4"e �a to(sr r �e+er tir TTA(11 Iv\T.R 1.►17pt Aa Mt('tunAarl DESCRtaF H(vN TIft PRIUE(Z MEM seetau hod APrLMAtlLL1 "'OM (ATTA(V C•oV6R LtTTIN AS NotVa"V) APPU(-.\-.T Sean sod Renee Drew - — ADoktcs 17715 Talbot Road 14h)Nt a 2M795.5193 E-MAIL reneeda 1 @hou"I.00m FAx of CONTACT PER.\()\/AGCNT Jenrtlfer web LNV" pton Tree ) Plux(t! to 206-3624M AnoRess 9792 Edmonds Way 0123 Edmonds. WA 98020 E-MAIL wtsbve@yahoo.00m FAX The Unfletskm d afythcant. and h(s her lh hem. and assigns, to conskieral on no the hilt-ImnItI ul lbc applkalMVl agrees ,U release• ut(Icmntfv, det ri l and Mthl the ('stv of Fdnwnds harmless trout ms and all "naxc. to+tc Imr "A.mablr tllmncs ( foes. MUM fnitn am action or infraction Aa%W to whole or pan upona,A false muling. Inrcurate or 1nsImmisl lnlot mum furnahed by the applicant, hm her lt% agenh or enytlotees By my signature. I certtfi that the tnfunnata, and exhibits herewith sutHtuned are tnu tad convey to the bait tat ens lmm lcdye nod that I am authorized to file this appltcanon on the hefulf of the owner as listed below SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT '^,d,& 7hpn Otaner's:'ton that the fa sulya-t land ace WW, sublevel tar the SIGNATVRF. pAM 4/?/2021 Pcentty tondo the penalty of pertury untlae the laws of the State of +t.ucment I have auth nrcd the above Applicant Agent to apply (so the and gr my (+con +., n t, i, fall and the gallof the Oly of Edmorib in~ the + .lrpllcalmn DAM Rn ueJ wr ,(:: /: B l.+n.l 1 v 1/gllt. orwe r.re f ,o l