Maplewood Park PropertyCIVIC CENTER
250 FIFTH AVE. N.
Office of the City Attorney
James A. Murphy
May 11, 1967
Mr. Donald Lawson
City Supervisor
Civic Center
Edmonds, Washington
Wifi ■
CITY OF EDMONDS
Snohomish County, Washington
Re: Maplewood Ravine Park Site
Dear Don:
Enclosed please find the Statutory Warranty Deed
and Earnest money agreement from Gary R. Edin and Barbara
K. Edin, to the City of Edmonds, which has been recorded.
Also enclosed is the Statutory Warranty Deed from
Lydia Peterson to the City of Edmonds, which has been
recorded and the Closing Statement, Purchaser's Escrow
Instructions and Earnest money agreement.
The Purchaser's Title Policy for these two parcels
will be forthcoming as soon as the escrow company obtains
a release from the mortgagee of the access easement to
that portion of the respective parcels which we have pur-
chased.
JDW:ds
urs very truly,
John D. Wallace
PROSPECT 6-1107
April 30, 1979
MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison
Mayor
FROM: Charles G. Dibble
Mayor's Admin. Asst.
SUBJECT: FUNDING SOURCE FOR UNION OIL BEACH PARKING
Attached are the Council's motion of April 24 and an
excerpt from the Park Board minutes of April 25.
We recommend that the appropriation for parking pavement
at Union Oil Beach be made from the in -lieu park fee
funds.
N
CGD/am
Attachments
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
April 25, 1979
UNION OIL PARK
Mr. Jim Jessel stated that, at the present time, Union Oil Park is closed, and
the Port and the City are attempting to find ways to discourage the use of the
area by teenagers. He went on to say that the most immediate need is that of a
blacktopped parking area. This parking area and the cost of it will be shared
jointly with the Port of Edmonds. The Port of Edmonds will fund one-half of
the costs involved in the parking lot, with the City of Edmonds assuring the
other one-half. The parking lot has been designed so that when Union Oil Park
is built, it is exactly the parking lot desired. This has been reviewed with
the City Council to set up the cooperative atmosphere with the Port of Edmonds.
The parking lot will have twenty-five parking stalls and it is felt that this
will nicely accommodate the 65 - 70 people using the park, which would be about
the maximum amount of traffic the park could bear. Bicycle stalls will also
be placed in this area. Mr. Jessel presented cost estimates for the parking
lot which would run in the neighborhood of $8,000.00 and he asked the Park
Board for their approval of using $4,204.00 in in -lieu funds for this project.
Inasmuch as there was not a quorum present at this meeting, a discussion ensued
as to a motion being passed regarding the use of the in -lieu fee funds for the
parking lot project. Members present approved of taking the funds for the park-
ing lot from the in -lieu fee funds and approval by proxy of the use of these funds
was granted when the other Park and Recreation Advisory Board members were called.
May 13, 1982
MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison
Mayor
FROM: Steve Simpson, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: REPORT FROM PARKS & RECREATION
ON UNION OIL BEACH IMPROVEMENTS
Union Oil Beach development is 50% complete. About $5,600 has been
spent to date from the Parks Acquisition and Improvement Fund to
complete grading, addition of topsoil, seeding, and irrigation.
The plan to complete the project includes the addition of pathways,
trees, play equipment, improvements to the entry, and an enlarged
parking lot. We estimate it will cost $20,000 from the -In Lieu
Park Fund to complete the Union Oil Beach park project.
SOS/mw
Attachment
C0(
May 13, 1982
MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison
Mayor
FROM: Steve Simpson, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: REPORT FROM PARKS & RECREATION ON UNION OIL BEACH IMPROVEMENTS
The Planning Advisory Board reviewed the development plans for Union Oil Beach
at their May 12, 1982 meeting.
Nancy Dilworth, Landscape Designer, and Jim Jessel, Project Administrator, re-
viewed the history of the City's shoreline plan for the development between
Brackett's Landing Beach and the Union Oil pier.
Development of Union Oil Beach is part of a comprehensive waterfront plan that
includes a pedestrian/bicycle path connecting developed nodes on the Edmonds
waterfront. The Union Oil Beach node was identified in the 1978 Waterfront
Plan as an area that should be developed. Although the beachfront is not be-
ing developed with the grandiose scale originally envisioned, the plan is be-
ing following wherever possible.
Development of Union Oil Beach began with a 22-car parking lot designed by the
Public Works Department that limited parking to one area. The Parks and Recrea-
tion Department designed the park after the lot was in place.
The park's design is intended to: Buffer park users from the industrial develop-
ment with berms and trees; encourage people to leave their cars to appreciate the
area's amenities; provide for active and passive activities; and leave natural
amenities in the park as is and develop only the altered areas.
The Planning Advisory Board questioned whether the City considered the natural
features and the original uses of the beach. Staff believed that there were few
natural elements in the gravel parking lot that the City wanted to preserve.
The area behind the beach was mostly fill dirt with no vegetation. The primary
use was by young people engaged in rowdy behavior. This behavior, sometimes
illegal and antisocial, discouraged use by other age and interest groups. The
City's policy of displacing this activity (to other parts of the City) was
questioned by Ward Phillips and Ray Sittauer. Mr. Phillips and Mr. Sittauer
believed that the City should have considered use by teens a legitimate activity
that should not have been eliminated without accommodating it elsewhere in the
City. The problem is now on Sunset Avenue where it is difficult to control and
overburdens the police and antagonizes other citizens. Mr. Phillips felt this
solution offered does not address the whole problem. Staff and other members
of the Planning Advisory Board felt the development would not stop the park's
use by teenagers, but would get them out of their cars. Staff also felt no one
had found a solution to the "teenage problem".
REPORT FROM PARKS & RECREATION
ON UNION OIL BEACH IMPROVEMENTS
May 13, 1982 - Page 2
The Planning Advisory Board questioned whether there is enough parking for the
expected increased use. Jim Jessel explained that park development standards
call for 21 spaces per acre for a neighborhood park. Union Oil Beach has 22
parking spaces. Plans include doubling the size to 44 spaces. This should be
sufficient for the parks' two acres and expected use level. Funds are available
for developing the larger parking lot. The City Staff do not believe park users
will have to use Port parking. At least a portion of the users will bicycle,
jog or walk to the park. There will be racks for bicycle parking, along with
benches and picnic tables. Public transportation will be encouraged as part of
the waterfront plan. The Planning Advisory Board suggested the City make every
effort to cooperate and coordinate with the Port on waterfront development.
The Planning Advisory Board asked if development was planned south of the Union
Oil pier. Jim Jessel said Union Oil Company would lease the property to the
City if a passage were provided over or under the pipeline. This should not
overtax the parking lot since the new area would be left in a natural condition
and not be much more of an attraction than it is now.
The Planning Advisory Board suggested that the entry chain link fence should be
softened with additional plantings.
The Planning Advisory Board recommended by unanimous vote to:
1. Review closing times of the park, and suggested that it not be before 10:00 p.m.
2. Continue the existing plans to develop the area and double the size of the
parking lot to 44 spaces.
3. Review the planting plans and soften the entry gate with additional plantings.
4. Explore every alternative to allow the City to lease the Union Oil property
south of the Union Oil pier and lease it as quickly as possible.
Note: This report is not an official account of the May 12, 1982 Planning Board
Meeting.
SOS/mw
June 3, 1982
MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison
Mayor
VIA: Steve Simpson, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
FROM: Jim Jessel, Project Administrator
Parks and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: REPORT FROM PARKS & RECREATION ON UNION OIL BEACH IMPROVEMENT
On May 12, 1982, we reviewed the status of the Union Oil Beach improvement
plans with the Planning Advisory Board. Their three major recommendations
were:
1. That the portion of the beach south of the Union Oil pier be con-
sidered in future planning.
2. That additional buffer landscaping be considered on Port of Edmonds
property.
3. That our recommendation for doubling the present parking lot size
be approved.
Mary Lou Block and I have met with Union Oil Company representatives to
discuss future uses of the southern beach and we have requested a meeting
with the Port of Edmonds; both in an effort to meet Planning Advisory
Board suggestions.
We have spent less than $6,000 to date on the Union Oil Beach improvements
project (excluding approximately $2,000 of in-house labor). This included
grading of the grass area by Edmonds Community College students, an auto-
matic irrigation system, equipment rental, grass seed, and construction of
the parking lot. The City Council authorized up to $30,000 for the Junior
High playfield and Union Oil Beach projects for 1982 from In Lieu Park Funds.
When negotiations with the Port are completed, we will return to the Planning
Advisory Board and City Council for authorization to finish the landscaping
and parking lot phase.
JJ/mw
Attachments
CITY
!TY OF E O M O N D S HARVE H. HARRISON
700 MAIN ST • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 96020 • (206) 775.2525 MAYOR
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
June 2, 1982
Mr. Gordon Maxwell, President
Port of Edmonds
456 Admiral Way
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Dear Gordon:
Subject: Waterfront Improvements
As noted in our June 1 conversation, the City of Edmonds Planning
Advisory Board recently reviewed our improvement plans for Union
Oil Beach and suggested that improvements to Port of Edmonds'
property be jointly considered. Specifically, entrance and buffer
landscaping was discussed.
I have attached the Planning Advisory Board meeting minutes for
your review.
Please call me at your earliest convenience to further discuss
these improvements.
�--.Sincerely,
7
Ja es F. Jessel
Project Administrator
Parks and Recreation Department
JFJ/mw
Attachment
cc: Mr. Ray Sittauer, Chairman
Planning Advisory Board
Mr. Steve Simpson, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
Nancy Dilworth, Landscape Designer
Parks and Recreation Department
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
May 12, 1982
The regular meeting of the Planning Advisory Board was called to order at 7:00 p.m,
by Chairman Ray Sittauer in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center.
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Ray Sittauer John Hodgin Duane Bowman, Assistant City Planner
John McGibbon Steve Simpson, Parks b Recreation Director
Dave Larson Jim Jessel, Project Administrator
Fred Ross Nancy Dilworth, Landscape Designer
J. Ward Phillips Felix deMello, Buildings & Grounds Supervisor
Ken Mattson Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney
Valina Walker Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MR. ROSS MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. WALKER, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 28, 1982,
MOT10N CARRIED.
STAFF AND PAB COMMENTS
Mr. Bowman reported that the City Council had a public hearing on the PAB recommendation
for downtown parking and remanded it to the PAB for further discussion. The Staff
will provide additional information for the PAB's consideration.
Mr. Bowman noted that the City Council had acted on the ordinance aggregating non-
conforming lots but they included the requirement for a covenant for a no protest
clause which the PAB had not recommended.
AUDIENCE
Lloyd Ostrom, 711 Puget Lane, noted that at the April 14 PAB meeting there was some
discussion of upcoming projects and one of them was a study of downtown land use and
update of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. He asked what that meant, inasmuch a lot of
time had been spent in putting together the Community Development Code, Mr. Bowman
responded that the PAB will be looking at the Comprehensive Policy Plan as it relates
to the downtown and its development, and the intent is not to rewrite the entire
Comprehensive Policy Plan, He said there is some interest in the possibility of
looking at programs for revitalization as they relate to development and design, Mr.
Phillips added that it is t❑ look at what has been done and to visualize it more in
detail. Mr. Larson also added that they think the specific parking requirements for
the downtown area are in conflict with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, and they are
not defensive about the Comprehensive Policy Plan but believe it is a working tool
and if conditions change it should be reviewed periodically also.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNION OIL PARK
AS PART OF THE CITY OF EOMONDS WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Landscape Designer Nancy Dilworth showed slides which reflected the development of
the waterfront from Union Oil Park to Brackett's Landing Park during the last few
years. Project Administrator Jim Jessel and she reviewed the history of this development
plan. The Union Oil Beach portion was identified in the 1978 Waterfront Plan as an
area that should be developed. It has a 22-car parking lot which is proposed to be
doubled in size. Mr. Phillips had been concerned that what is being accomplished
there is ❑verdevelopment and that the site should be left in its natural state. The
Staff indicated that the area behind the beach was mostly fill dirt with no vegetation
and that there were few natural elements in the gravel parking lot that the City
wanted to preserve. Mr. McGibbon colimented that it had developed to a beach surrounded
by a grassy dune and he thought it looked "pretty decent." Mr. Larson urged that the
south portion of Union Oil Beach be included in the plans. He said consideration
should be given to how it relates to the present parking and the proposed parking,
and also that the City must learn to work with the Port of Edmonds. He also urged
r
working with voluntary groups for improving the planting areas, noting that Edmonds
has some very active garden clubs and volunteers. The hearing was opened, no one
wished to speak, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Bowman said he had received a
telephone call from a lady who was concerned that the Union Oil Park should be kept
open and natural.
Mr. Phillips said it is important to address the fact that in the very beginning
stages of planning something was displaced and it was human beings in the form of
teenagers. He said a developer doing this would have to file an EIS, and he was
disturbed that the fact that something was displaced had not been addressed. He said
this was an area that teenagers used for many years and then a park was put on it, so
now they are up on Sunset. He thought the mental thinking process could have worked
better, and the Park Department should be careful of what they are displacing when
they work on something. Mr. Ross responded that he did not think the City had a
responsibility to provide a place for young people to drink beer and smoke marijuana.
Mr. Mattson said that problem was addressed and this is the answer to the problem.
Mr. Phillips then said the parks on the water should not be closed before sunset, and
he also thought there should be some trees at the entry to Union Oil Park. He encouraged
looking for a lease for the remaining property. 11R. LARSON THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY
MR. PHILLIPS, TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY REVIEW THE CLOSING TIMES FOR
THE WATERFRONT PARKS AND THAT CLOSING TIME FOR BRACKETT'S LANDING BEACH AND UNION OIL
BEACH BE 10:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. MR. PHILLIPS MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. WALKER,
THAT THE PAB RECOMMEND THAT THE PARKING LOT AT UNION OIL BEACH BE DOUBLED IN SIZE
IMMEDIATELY. MOTION CARRIED. MR. PHILLIPS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LARSON, THAT THE
PAB RECOMMEND THAT THE PARK DEPARTMENT EXPLORE THE ALTERNATIVES FOR LEASING THE
PROPERTY ADJOINING UNION OIL BEACH TO THE SOUTH. MOTION CARRIED. It was noted that
bicycle racks and softening the entrance with landscaping also are to be considered.
ISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 20.60 REGARDING FREESTANDING SIGNS
Mr. McGibbon stated that as now written the Code allows some flexibility and the
decision can always be appealed to the City Council. He asked for some evidence that
this was not in the City's best interest. Mr. Phillips responded that the Code
itself is in conflict because 15.15.030 B.2., "Downtown Concept," states that signs
are to be low level and oriented to pedestrians, and in another part it says they
only will be allowed if the sign cannot be placed on the building, and he felt a
developer could abuse that. Mr. McGibbon said he had walked down 5th Ave. and he
thought some of the freestanding signs look better than a sign on the building, e.g.,
an attorney's office in a residential building with a small freestanding sign in
front. Mr. Phillips responded that University Federal Savings is now trying to
interpret the Code to their advantage and it is not working in the City's favor, in
that when their sign proposals were rejected they said they would use the old pole
sign on the property. Mr. Bowman noted that this was only a discussion item this
evening and that a public hearing would be held May 26 at which time some kind of
decision should be rendered. Natalie Shippen, in the audience, commented that there
are three kinds of signs: flush with the building, projecting from the building, and
freestanding signs. She suggested a maximum height for the freestanding signs. She
thought the Edmonds Garden sign to be lovely and noted that it 1s a freestanding
sign, so she thought it extreme to eliminate all freestanding signs. She suggested a
maximum of 5', as an arbitrary suggestion. Mr. Phillips responded that there is a
strong consensus of opinion that there should be no more pole signs in downtown
Edmonds. Mr. Larson asked if one of the problems was the type of sign, rather than
the height, and Mr. Bowman said it was not, but he said they may want to distinguish
between pole signs and freestanding signs. Mr. Phillips said if a sign exceeds the
height of a pedestrian it is not low level and pedestrian oriented, and as the Code
is now, downtown Edmonds could end up with signs like Westgate or Highway 99. He
felt the City should have the ability to be specific in establishing a maximum. Mrs.
Walker suggested that the height of freestanding signs be restricted to 5' unless
otherwise approved by the ADB. This proposal was acceptable to the Board. Mr.
McGibbon said he would like to see examples of recently approved freestanding signs,
and also he would like to have a representative of the ADB present for the hearing.
He said he would like to ask what difficulty the ADB perceives in enforcing the
ordinance.
Chairman Sittauer said he would not be present for the June 9 meeting. Mr. Tanaka
was scheduled to be present on June 23 to discuss the duties and powers of the Board.
There was no further business to come before the Board, and the meeting adjourned at
8:50 P.M.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
Page 2 - May 12, 1982
MAKE REMITTANCES PAYABLE TO:
ERNE SIEVER
SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
EVERETT, WASHINGTON
AFFIDAVIT AND REAL ESTATE SALES TAX RECEIPT
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTONJ ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH '
, Being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says:
That the following information relative to the sale of real estate is true and correct.
Seller's Name
Address
Buyer's Name
Address__
Date of Instrument Nature of Instrument
Date of Delivery Gross Sales or Selling Price
Legal Description of Property Conveyed: -
RETURN BOTH COPIES
SELLING
PRICE
SALES
TAX
NO SA
REQ
E'
J I v
TAX
.ED
TAX FEB 2 1,
967
PEN i
ey bra i _
nont t..
Chap. 11, Laws 1951,
Extraordinary Session
Signature of Seller.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this
residing
day of
19
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
WASHING,.iN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STAND._ yD FORM
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
WASHINGTON TITLE DIVISION
719 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
hereinafter called the Company, a California corporation, for valuable consideration, and
subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or
persons named in item 1 of Schedule A, together with the persons and corporations
included in the definition of "the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations,
against loss or damage sustained by reason of:
1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A
being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as stated in item 2 of
Schedule A; or
2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date
hereof, not shown in Schedule B; or
3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Sched-
ule A, or priority, at the date hereof, over any such instrument, of any
lien or encumbrance not shown in Schedule B;
provided, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense re-
sulting from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract respecting
the estate, lien or interest insured.
The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs in-
curred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder.
In witness whereof, Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
has caused this policy to be authenticated by the facsimile signature of its President
and Secretary but this policy is not valid unless attested by an authorized signatory.
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
By �Q
PRESIDENT
ULZ-4 k{-�aA
SECRETARY
Attest:
�-
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
j as SCHEDULE A
NO. F-134 813 AMOUNT $ 39200.00
DATE February 21, 1967 at 9:00 a.m. PREMIUM $ 33.75
1. INSURED
THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation.
2. TITLE TO THE ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED BY THIS POLICY IS VESTED IN
The named insured.
3. ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED
Fee simple estate.
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE REAL ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS POLICY IS ISSUED
Lot 35, Except the West 136.83 feet, Plat of Pine Ridge, according to
plat thereof recorded in volume 13of plats,page 66, records of Sn:homish
County, Washington.
SCHEDULE B
DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER MATTERS AGAINST WHICH THE COMPANY
DOES NOT INSURE:
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
1. General taxes for 1967 in the sum of *15.48.
2. Restrictions contained in deed recorded under auditor's file No.
1354961, substantially as follows:
Exterior of all buildings to be finished within one year from date
of starting.
No outside toilets permitted.
3. Easement for ingress and egress and for utilities over, under and
upon a portion of said premises granted to all present and future owners,
their heirs and assigns, of all or any portion of Lots 35 and 36, Pine
Ridge, and unto Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, and
West Coast Telephone Company, by instrument recorded March 19, 1964,
under auditor's file No. 1683382. Maintenance of the Easement granted
and conveyed herein shall be the responsibility of and the costs borne
equally by the above mentioned present and future owners, their heirs
and assigns.
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private easements not disclosed
by the public records; rights or claims of persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the public records; material or
labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records; water rights or matters relating thereto; any
service, installation or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity.
2. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents; right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the
exercise of powers over navigation; limitation by law or governmental regulation with respect to subdivision, use, enjoyment or oc-
cupancy; defects, •liens, encumbrances, or other matters created or suffered by the insured; rights or claims based upon instruments
or upon facts not disclosed by the public records but of which rights, claims, instruments or facts the insured has knowledge.
3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien
(End of Schedule B)
R-2
' TI
Pioneer
National
Title
Insurance
Company
WASHINGTON TITLE DIVISION
719 SECOND AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
— ISSUED BY —
�a'ds KE 'MA I M�;1
TITLE Hsi �')� -;SCE CU,PLAY
SNORMISH COUNTY 0frICE
EVERETT, WASH.
O 0 m in. 0 " — � �* CY m � m m a, 1+ �r ► e+ G �* � tr F,t w -1 a, Cr m d 1r O 01 10 -d w to wv
ybyya. �mvpiP 0(D::S o �;�wCD M1' eb
M nW 04mmyN A�m�''�ooy Ko~
• eD CD V p� m m nH m y o '.': W� x m W (� Cp n G �* H m ' c* G a. �.., a m m a. °G o m H
�.s.nay Qm o�my mCp -a•. �go M
macoqn c� aC »�F .,m
', bramaG°peya
CO n la.
,
Cp .m m G
M m RaQnc mOO C°W m m O
° FA *a.m v otrtr �kKQC9�G0p n m 00m m w V C m m o 0 m m b�w y°yp eG npdpo
'I.+p a.gzgOG pGGm�+5VW 0 mCDw n o Gr W '� a9 0 m y m p m w-*C yao G°�am m �m°C *
mQwma. 0�O
a,0wty WMww-1 �
ID �m
n :1 y m .1 n-t o 000 m w a m m ,am ° x p - COy mbm G m C . q .0 0-1
m W °°oo�ad m m mm
o
yO, m C.m Ifl R. m°po C wa m ?m Gy m m'C b 0 0 o �° Do
aq + a.1 O o y Cm my w m� m O G p O
K °mGmwcrm
Mm m wGaq Cm°Qm w O m mb 9pp ka4 a aqr a aq wN < w. w PGw7m0A�4+0
'
m m
Com��pd•.-m`Ya mP'd:4 (Dwtiypmy°�w� cnno�..Cmynq mt'CMm m�m�bO�.
Ph
oycfiar . `a�m��?*+ �n.;R�o 'OnpHe�ay by p�r y 'em •oO*<�m~p�* m 10
ycm py 'lD •'<;G� 'ca�`pyd
a mnmy+ • ��i�i `ay a� pyp �mwGn�mm'-m G o m w pG c m ea�ymmp'
•'hrtovmaq
'
m'oMOOm mnmK 64.
mO J' y m t�mm M mp m0ww0MrC p+Cr m+pp 11CDImto
m d° �m nm °
CD m M CD w
M a ° wcm � pPto ac,�1d a S�°
m�aap m oommmw 00 n m
maa0a a� so m Ko �
rn e,Ne 'd O w :, .,a�'
Q. M. �G' oq� a.C`*m
cr CD paq COrCD pmmmOpO pm
m �o:may
n a4 am ° w go
1m 'R
CD wr M mto qMm mm G mG m M w
Ger aC0 m C ° am m.m omrpG m aq
° �eKm �°^m0 � mmo °'.Amm°o�
CD ma,a.w w o m y m+, °CD w m w 0. m
oY5$ Mo a�� m w ?r:-s Or5 o m, +0 5 5: M', Pp:mwwmo `pMewp*►
.'
�m 9 o o 0,soo w m P4N
,7'VO m m--0'4'4 w ;+,' O t•m -1m p w !. m
nwn Ommosw 'd�Kyra om...b �C�°uCDoso :5
� ma°
ma.-
4��.ajxaxa9mpN m ,�w am w m yp Oqm o m ° N+ m.m+
CD m0. 0 o5 pcc+�m 0mK.+mm_ Gad m cHd �mcmw.1W
mi ° CnSo mmaoq*`f
44 Gmp p mm o y o rwb amoaC mGnw*obmp44 m We � ° o 0o ::1
�C' °�
a4y'y w�wm N CS o' nmmtrxnsw mw
, n
G�mwaywm*aOwp.mea►.tr ..�m�HmyN�c�p+ . emmoypwmmWnoKCA�' �pGw��ayrmoy
�pmw
• py mn mwwam •w4 mn'wyo wa " —o"10p cmmp�5]r =Ca.i: �7eNmm.r .. �Om naaw<m�~ • -t"mm"omm.Prb�aiGGpGby ,m►Xan►�eh' . ,anamdmmayGC-
aacr Gn po0Om�w"� CrKmmGw°
CmK,m
Po►ema�yCee+!+►
...'
mmor
m K 0 0 -m m►m
y Go .4 W Q' w m p° w�* �t m W m p o m
m m m w O oXn
mIm, ° ePm �McmnK �w ac aq C oq �0°ad .oq m :1�as'Am
�i,jp�DA0o°pD `7oQ:mm •
CD ° n m m w.vw JG
"'n 7 MN P. p' mm o
m D`�y+ °Y mM er ey o fo ima n oaoa•m G 0' p m m °P m m - y d p w mD
P'p
. amH4 'CO w '04° Pmpo.pmOC.� m
o n n oa PO m am w N O m `1 p0 aa,m o am
5 m°D wv m= m 5 N ap tr m, p*wb. "�m ° A m maGmOm p and 1 dy o1 w m b p m m mm m Om _
Kbo`d 0Wm o m dw`� aM m m 0 10 W
m .4 m n � m 'dp O G -4 n � w
�a� ,�Ca�wyp 0 bm'I p
o ]0CGmmkCMcowp C Go,�dm�ee��
'd ° p 'o�mC m° +
m m O 1
M ��.o m 0b m
w y g.,p .,o + ID 0.
9G �m er� m ay wo�m o +m
nm Aw NpC m w O C N aq Dm � % n — m p CD
oay amm y aoy bn�G mm
� m =0gn MpCa�-myGmm�o
i n wto m y O ° 0.CD M CD 'C 5�mmm m 0m t cap OdOpm ,mm5FL m 7�x�pm
'V wmmo9c* �Amw aM m Jw o o y m wm o o m ►y
m m mm Ewo aq Oq so ayi.�am0am$9�JdC'G D ° .m am MK 1Z m Om y o.�m M 'r7►-
..
A
Oz
C
O
x
a
H
C
Y
nyr
z
rn
[ 0
i•
ORANi
Filed for Record at Request of
i 934331
i
Name.............................. _........... ................»..........»..---------------. ---------------------
Address.......................... 1, +:.. ,�S_...... =.......(:....----••-......1.---•--.......
Cityand State ......................................................... .,..,,........................
SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE:
. JL. OF
RECORD
I
PAGE
IREG- OF �
A
;
1 1
I�I� EL�i :nTis.;�l�l
A
�
ff'• A
TITLE I""SURAN! J{E CO.
{
- AM 9:00
1967 A- -
A
i
STANL-EY DUBUQUE AUDITOR
A
A
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, !Aal.
-----------------------------------
i
-- :
'
Statutory 1, 1 arrarliy Deems ,Form 467- 1-REV
THE, GRANTOR GARY R. EDIN and BARBARA K. EDIN, his wife
co for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS
M
C7 in hand paid, conveys and warrants to THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation
0~
the following described real estate, situated, in the County of Snohomish , State of
Washington:
Lot 35, EXCEPT West 136r83 feet, Plat of Pine Ridge, according to plat thereof
recorded in volume 13 of Plats, page 66, records of Snohomish County, Washington.
No
71
L U. _ . �•.. %%%
/1y
SUBJECT TO restrictions contained in deed recorded under auditor's file No. 1354961,
substantially as follows:
Exterior of all buildings to be finished within one year from date of starting.
No outside toilets permitted.
SUBJECT TO Easement for ingress and for utilities over, under and upon a portion of
said premises granted to all present and future owners, their heirs and assigns, of
all or any portion of Lots 35 and 36, Pine Ridge, and unto Public Utility District
No. 1 of Snohomish County, and West Coast Telephone Company, by instrument recorded
March 19, 1964 under auditor's file No. 1683382. Maintenance of the Easement granted
and conveyed herein shall be the responsibility of and the costs borne equally by the
above mentioned present and future owners, their heirs and assigns.
Dated this 18th day of
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
�ss.
County of Snohomish
,1;967
••.... (SEAL)
...... (SEAL.)
On this day personally appeared before me Gary R. Edin and Barbara K. Edin.
to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instruni6t,' .4nd
co
acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act Aiid,dee,d' for. •the
uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under m hand and official seal this 1 `f V
Y C� day of ,Ja�aarY«��" 4, , f.- + 9' 67
Wotery Public in and for the State of Washington,. `
residing at Lynnwood
OFFICIAL RECORDi VOL, 070
�1TY OF EDMON_ J"
EARNEST MONEY RECEIPT & AGREEMENT: EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ---- Janu2 ry___
Received from THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "purchaser," One Hundred
Dollars and no cents ($100.00) in the form of a note for $100.00 due on or before Ninety (90) Days, paid or delivered to agent as
earnest money in part payment of the purchase price of the following described real estate in SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASH-
INGTON, commonly known as .__vacant prop rty behind- 20429_._-.._...5th--Pl.__.Wo.a---Ed_monds-Q-----------------------------------------
(The parties hereto hereby authorize agent to insert over their signatures the correct legal description of the above designated
property if unavailable at time of signing, or to correct the legal description entered if erroneous or incomplete.)
The East 273.5 feet of Tract 35, plat of Pine Ridge according to plat thereof as
recorded in Volume 13 of plats, Page 66, records of Snohomish County, W-ashington.
TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE is Three.•Thousand_ Ttao--Hundred._Dollars.•and._noD@B s- (s1,.M -,_Q
payable as follows:
ALL CASH, IN LIEU OF CONDEMNATION FOR PUBLIC PARK, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD BY THE SELL-
ER THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL $Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS AS
TO ALL TERMS HEREIN PROVIDED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS OF PURCHASEWS SIGNATURE, SAID APPROVAL
TO BE APPROVER] AND ATTESTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS ACREEMENT-
1. Title of seller is to be free of encumbrances, or defects, except: ..... NQNE_:----------------------------------------------
Rights reserved in federal patents or state deeds, building or use restrictions general to the district, existing easements not
inconsistent with purchaser's intended use, and building or zoning regulations or provisions shall not be deemed encum-
brances or defects. Encumbrances to be discharged by seller may be paid out of purchase money at date of closing.
2. Seller agrees to furnish and deliver to office of closing agent as soon as procurable a standard form purchaser's policy of title
insurance or report preliminary thereto issued by a title insurance company, and seller authorizes agent to apply at once
following approval by The City of Edmonds City Council for such title insurance. The title policy to be issued shall con-
tain no exceptions other than those provided for in said standard form plus encumbrances or defects noted in paragraph
1. above. Delivery of such policy or report to closing agent named shall constitute delivery to purchaser. If title is not eo
insurable as above provided and cannot be made so insurable by termination date set forth in paragraph 6. hereof, earn-
est money shall be refunded and all rights of purchaser terminated: provided that purchaser may waive defects and elect
to purchase. if title is so insurable and purchaser fails or refuses to complete purchase, the earnest money shall be for-
feited as liquidated damages. The agent shall not be responsible for delivery of title.
3. Taxes for the current year, rents, insurance, interest, mortgage reserves, water and other utilities constituting liens shall
of Closing
be prorated as of ... ...... :••------------------------------------------ ---...........
Purchaser shall pay for remaining oil in fuel tank, the amount to
be determined by the supplier.
4. Purchaser shall be entitled to possession on --- .r, .: e _ o f C to
5. SelIer offers purchaser the property in its present condition, on terms noted, and agrees not to withdraw this offer dur-
ing said period, or until earlier rejection thereof by purchaser. If purchaser does not accept this agreement within the
time specified, the agent shall refund the earnest money upon demand.
..�.:��...._..
6. The sale shall be closed in office of agent or ................................. ......... ........ ......._......... ...._......._.-............. ....... within days
after title insurance policy or report preliminary thereto is delivered showing title insurable, as above provided. The pur-
toacompleteseller
purchase in accordance with d of either, thistin escrow with escrow agreement the cost of escowtall instn-iments and monies s a,i be paid a -half each by seller sa d
purchaser.
7. Linoleum, window screens, screen doors, plumbing and lighting fixtures (except floor and standing lamps), shades, Venetian
blinds, curtain rods, all attached bathroom fixtures, trees, plants and shrubbery in the yard, water heating apparatus and
ifixtures, awnings, n the ale. Atttachedntelevis oncantennasi if any, that aresystems
now on the premiesashali remain intat are now on thect andsshall be ies shall ncluded in
the sale.
8. There are no verbal or other agreements which modify or affect this agreement. Time is of the essence of this agreement.
The unders
agrees to carry
above agent foyr
Seller
CITY OF EDMONDS
... ..............................
Edmonds City Supervisor
l on this i _".. day of .�l l?Jx , _......._.... 1961q, hereby accepts and approves the above agreement and
all of the terpt s thereof; however, it is understood and agreed that the seller will pay no commission to the
ices. I/we fi�thgr agree and aelmowledge receipt of a true copy of this agreement, signed by both parties.
t
0
Seller's Address
Seller Phone
PR 6-2
...._ Wife) 7410
u.._..�......_.... _
DAY OF is r......... 1966.
APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL THIS ---------- - ........ -• - ""
(seal)
Attested:—
....................
city clerk
For THE CITY O DM0ND8
. .......
AYOR
f
WASHINGTON LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANITARD FORM � ��"' `s��`�
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
WASHM"gGTON TITTLE INSURANCE COMPANY
719 Second Avenue
Seattle 4, Washington
hereinafter called the Company, a Washington corporation, for valuable considera-
tion, and subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure
the person or persons named in item 1 of Schedule. A, together with the persons
and corporations included in the definition d "the insured" as set forth in the
conditions and stipulations, against loss or damage sustained by reason of:
1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being
vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or
2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date here-
of, not shown in Schedule E ; or
3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A,
or priority, at the date hereof, over any such instrument, of any lien or en-
cumbrance not shown in Schedule B ;
provided, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense
resulting from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract
respecting the estate, lien or interest insured.
The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs
incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims here-
under.
In witness whereof, WASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
has caused this policy to be authenticated by the facsimile signature of its President,
but this policy is not valid unless attested by the Secretary or an Assistant
Secretary.
'YY1�5HINOTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By
•
President
Attest:
Assistant Secretary
SCHEDULE A
NO. ,��'-3006'l AMOUNT $ 7500.00
DATE October 11, 1958 at 8:00 a.m. PREMIUM$ 46.25
1. INSURED
CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation.
2. TITLE TO THE ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED BY THIS POLICY IS VESTED IN
An undivided 2/3 interest in H. A. Dent, presumptively subject to
the corununity interest of his wife, Violette M. Dent, an undivided
1/3 interest in LaMonte Shorett, presumptively subject to the
community interest of his wife, Wilhelmina Shorett.
S. ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED
Fee simple estate.
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE REAL ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS POLICY IS ISSUED
That portion of Government Lot one (1), Section nineteen (19),
Township twenty-seven (27) North, Range four (4) Bast, W.M.,
Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning on the west line of said lot at a point 500 feet north
of the southwest corner; thence east parallel to the south
line of said lot to a point 200 feet west of the east line of
said lot; thence north paralleling the east line of said lot
to the intersection with the southerly line of the Maplewood
county road as established under Survey No. 1111; thence westerly
along the southerly line of said county road to the intersection
with the north line of said government lot 1; thence west to the
northwest corner of said lot 1; thence south_ along west line of
said lot to the place of beginning.
DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRA7
DOES NOT INSURE
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
SCHEDULE B
ES AND OTHER MATTERS AGAR- 'WHICH THE COMPANY
1. Reservation of easer, ;t contained in contract n 3d in paragraph
2 below which provides for the right to maintain, repair and
replace the wooden water main now in place over and across the
above described premises.
2. Contract of sale in favor of the insured, City of Edmonds, a
municipal corporation, recorded under auditor's file No.
1303750, records of Snohomish County, Washington..
Excise tax receipt No. 96960.
NOTE: This contract provides for no assignment without consent
of vendors.
GENERAL
1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private easements
not disclosed by the public records; rights or claims of persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by
the public records; material or labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records;
water rights or matters relating thereto; any service, installation or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity.
2. Exceptions and reservations in United States -Patents; right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America
in the exercise of powers over navigation; limitation by law or governmental regulation with respect to subdivision, use,
enjoyment or occupancy; defects, liens, encumbrances, or other matters created or suffered by the insured; rights or claims
based upon instruments or upon facts not disclosed by the public records but of which rights, claims, instruments or facts
the insured has knowledge.
3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becom-
ing a lien.
(End of Schedule B)
fssufD SY
sNoHomisH covNrr
r1TLE comp,,,,,
1510 WAIL STREET
EVERETT, WASH,
WAS H I N GTO N
TITLE,
INSURANCE
COMPANY
719 SECOND AVENUE
SEATTLE 4, WASHINGTON
p• C• a' o 'r• o eD a �• e+ pw �o p„ e+ rr � e+ � � � r�. w ,h� Cr � w rr o P� �d 'Cy � P� t�' �d
m ki �o y p � p. ce ,p, �' y � � � d � co �' �' �" o p' co �,,� A d+ • co �o � � � � w y y re y �..�
cyo d 7v p; 0q M
a,oW ypp�°"N'�a. 8.m�AppMH
w P A v two a"° w �r �. G w w° W "• w w
8 m a to ... A oq er �' an d er o m m ° m N.. ro w e•r CL
0 w m
�m��w�� o o a b m ya, p Cr Wtr ogmom q
d a w 0.0 m o v,'d y.� m m m m
D o w m w C
o'er m �o ...o `y* o w y� �'C m G,°w '�� �.m a'0 a'p.co C t°�y w tee+
w rh p, o' �. w ear w '4 �' m . N' opp b
d �. FOti ti �4 er a d m co ° M two o p d
�, to a " N, �, e+ a a a
'4 m ��� �� �� w M tr go 8 f �•�� p o w p:m p o M aG.�•�m m w m w
a+mw too top m ~ b" m" e+ad e4map•
°e4adoe4 °0� am py �Ap y w Aye. d'c� (te e+
G. ' m C' a o m O �4 M d n o o o y co S.
°� a• �, �-t, p
try' coaow oA.�er�,� e,2.0'4 ovw��.a �m�o�9.b� p8md �d'�ao0
M o e+p o �0 p �� � A+ � Kb as ° d'
,q �+ ty �, ;4 .o d t p�'"t, aq �, p� c�' t"o M a s� co c to � ,tea �s' G' ° co
er R tp to .y�• n m er W . 0 fD eCD a p to y
a e# p '°"4 + ,W°Pa"�� �tAeor p�er• OowCqr "p' wmp mo C. mmw .aqywG b Lr
e° ,vm•,'`d44 0wfD Ubq mp�krID I'* er� Iemr*'Ma.y op .ram o a
er woq `4 o 11
M mty�
o
wo °r4o�w COP�w �m
w �m o tr e°+. t"o �' a e+ er ° � ,p � w O er � �• G d p er �' a• �; �r er y d' m er d m �. �. a e4 fi C
v� wp coonwB.p'oer w MC+ tom b'
d w w � W. G m CJ m m r n ° e+ cr m er O d fD n m w a w ks
w Q°q m m �,d d•An "'ps m coo �' ''�' OR o `*w
o a w pp o w a o v°, Ri C d p ° F 5
tyoR.mm a�*.:� �w.am�G.�a�by�o°m,`4�'pGya mV'G�
?�r� m b`�oa�.°'~.:r�,as°a��ma5'�a �p,�p�.5gm,`4 m�oN`a°�5�~��
P7 m er e+ m M � ° "4 p p' � � � � � e4o p p O ta � a
ppw ° o d H r°+, �y� rr w �o 52. o er cmo um, b '4 t h p. p o, m o mGT m car vai
9. cD p aq H, p' p' to p w p, y m w to p co m d to w
o. p, 5. & d m i7. wy y w O
.. A °O t4. & �' w puwi Fn�`a.`4 tdo� n p
y ,d d• m " m p .�' w p d• tD d' tD �. y tD rp .. m ° A.
"a m p so?ram° o�° o a.erorr y P::c"o 0. w mCD
•.to�wra�Mgo w.rd~m+hwowro- wcromro ~o'C`CwVr
y e+ ~ m p ~ dq m p p '.s
o^ o9 0' mer 0 e+ w a b Q p w w o b w a er y 0 `4 twe K r. m
a K p pwq a s w m w d o Uq A o "' A �'co er C° m w 'IM - a r, p ai
p' C :° d e+ w p m e r t' es p m "• O m �' g. m e+ m
O pd °j v m °fi w w ro cyo a p p w w" a O m ewr m o m n+
2.
& m �. m W m a w o a• 0 er'd p p. c d ., p w w m p oq ,d y o M
m m r, m er m m o �' ty '4 ° o m w er m y o p b m
• m y oq "` `4 m a n m c"o m R w w W 95,
P� m p' X a o �• a
w C w E? m y C3 p m m 'C a w e+
A� °n rm+� y w
'4a" p wa ymw wo mtommp�3m`'
p W `� w �'C " � m ,,. �• � ° w � A� w �' c4o � � ° � � � � d �. m O. O.'b � �' p� y �'
�pad"a pp , �M °po - 4qq M +
rn 0K
a m5 mwOw . aA� m'eC* wm m
y.h� var and w d C+o 0 N m �A N� w yp e+m ~ a
era c y p+ a �. o 'C p, y r°n �' o' I� c MW er o er m owq fi b m a 0. ti o m
to w mp ° w d m �. by m o d m p o m o b ym� w m m o M a is
A �S p tm"� �. A' t� �n O �r`r c� y t� P, w A= A 'C d C w m p p w m ce to w e+ y
w A rbp e` ° �•h �,' h7 p C , � M a' m tT to M `�' a emr ° w
°Q8 y h9 o�'00 y -o emr ~m y ifl a .°e ak c A.dY G
c"o "° `r P� is con O d w two p" 0 a d' � m m M m w m M w a C r
o W ps v gym, e*
A. a �' ti 'mQ mp co �m��t o �. y a w K er °y � �pf m A c�'o m m o
epr M G. M w d o °.! p' �'. �" p 'Q to d o9 by w w m m w N. �r o b ZD
er er ... N 0 m o w A G p, w b 5. p to :- m �°�yl p o tmu b O. M M o d co ID ~
a+ d y W rh 9 " 'O p P7 O. P� O.
`� co rp d C3 �. p� ~ 0 by by d' a'.. a P+
m rmi, m d y p e"o E. a d' w a e+ er m p o my w, d m w y `� v a m p m
ps " w d w A+ Oq er G� co
m m o w
n+ O f9 y w Ry CL m o
m p p w n o p m a w. why e
�w a ao w w' d m y rp e+w
w A w o C w er y
y o c'e m m_'� o��' aq
r =M g'm" e°dr� D�'o a�J a
p G w e+ A F Cs o t"o t� p d co n w. d w C w er �Y V3? w ro ro m O. to
9 w o ps' o to a ID cmo p w m z w m C w rr ftq Uq er co oq
M y 4 e r a w `��' o' :r
16-/9D �p
PIONEER NATIONAL
TITLE INSURANCE
ATICOR COMPANY Policy of Title Insurance
PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a
valuable consideration, and subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the
person or persons named in item 1 of Schedule A, together with the persons and corporations included in the
definition of "the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations, against loss or damage sustained
by reason of:
1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof,
otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or
2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date hereof, not shown in Schedule B; or
3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A, or priority, at the date hereof,
over any such instrument, of any lien or encumbrance not shown in Schedule B;
provided, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense resulting from the refusal of
any person to, enter into, or perform, any contract respecting the estate, lien or interest insured.
The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an
incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder.
This policy shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating officer of the Company.
REP UVE L01
CITY OF EDMOND!
cicss1c Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
by
`�"`
President
9
Attest 6-1 Secretary
Countersig ed:
By
Validating Signatory
TO 1483 PNTI WA (7-74) Washington Land Title Association Standard Form Policy
1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and
area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public
or private easements, streets, roads, alleys or high -
ways, unless disclosed of record by recorded Plat or
conveyance, or decree of a Court of record; rights or
claims of persons in possession, or claiming to be in
possession, not disclosed by the public records; ma-
terial or labor liens, or liens under the Workmen's
Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records;
water rights or matters relating thereto; any service,
installation or construction charges for sewer, water,
electricity, or garbage removal.
2. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents:
Schedule E3, General Exceptions
prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or im-
provement of the land resulting from the rights of the
public or riparian owners to use any waters which may
cover the land; defects, liens, encumbrances, or other
matters created or suffered by the insured; rights or
claims based upon instruments or upon facts not dis-
closed by the public records but of which rights,
claims, instruments or facts the insured has know-
ledge.
3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to
special assessments and special levies, if any,
preceding the same becoming a lien.
right of use, control or regulation by the United States 4. "Consumer credit protection," "truth -in -lending,"
of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; or similar law, or the failure to comply with said
limitation by law or governmental regulation with re- law or laws.
spect to subdivision, use, enjoyment or occupancy; any
1 . The Company shall have the right to, and wi 11, at its own
expense, defend the insured with respect to all demands
and legal proceedings founded upon a claim of title, encum-
brance or defect which existed or is claimed to have existed
prior to the date hereof and is not set forth or excepted here-
in; reserving, however, the option at any time of settling the
claim or paying the amount of this policy in full. In case any
such demand shall be asserted or any such legal proceedings
shall be instituted the insured shall at once give notice there-
of in writing to the Company at its home office and, if the in-
sured is a party tb such legal proceedings, secure to the
Company, within ten days after service of first process upon
the insured, the right to defend such legal proceedings in the
name of the insured so far as necessary to protect the in-
sured, and the insured shall render all reasonable assist-
ance in such defense. If such notice shall not be given, or
the right to defend secured, as above provided, then all
liability of the Company with regard to the subject matter
of such demand or legal proceedings, and any expense in-
cident thereto, shall terminate; provided, however, that
failure to give such notice shall in no case prejudice the
claim of the insured unless the Company shall be actually
prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of
such prejudice.
2. In the event of final judicial determination by a court of
competent jurisdiction, under which the estate, lien or in-
terest insured is defeated or impaired by reason of any ad-
verse interest, lien or encumbrance not set forth or excepted
herein, claim may be made as herein provided. A statement
in writing of any loss or damage, for which it is claimed the
Company is liable, shall be furnished to the Company at its
home office within sixty days after such loss or damage
shall have been ascertained. No right of action shall accrue
with respect thereto until thirty days after such statement
shall have been furnished and no recovery shall be had un-
less an action shall have been commenced thereon within
one year after the expiration of said thirty days. Any rights
or defenses of the Company against a named insured shall
be equally available against any person or corporation who
shall become an insured hereunder as successor of such
named insured.
3. The Company may at any time pay this policy in full,
whereupon all liability of the Company shall terminate.
Every payment made by the Company, exclusive of costs
incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settle-
ment of claims hereunder, shall reduce the liability of the
Company by the amount paid. The liability of the Company
shall in no case exceed the actual loss of the insured and
costs which the Company is obligated to pay. When the
Company shall have paid a claim hereunder it shall be sub-
rogated to all rights and remedies which the insured may
have against any person or property with respect to such
claim, or would have if this policy had not been issued,
and the insured shall transfer all such rights to the Company.
If the payment made by the Company does not cover the loss
of the insured, such subrogation shall be proportionate.
Conditions and Stipulations
Whenever the Company shall be obligated to pay a claim un-
der the terms of this policy by reason of a defect in the title
to a portion of the area described herein, liabi lity shall be
limited to the proportion of the face amount of this policy
which the value of the defective portion bears to the value
of the whole at the time of the discovery of the defect, un-
less liability is otherwise specifically segregated herein.
If this policy insures the lien of a mortgage, and claim is
made hereunder, the Company may pay the entire indebted-
ness and thereupon the insured shall assign to the Company
the mortgage and the indebtedness secured thereby, with all
instruments evidencing or securing the same, and shall con-
vey to the Company any property acquired in full or partial
satisfaction of the indebtedness, and all liability of the
Company shall thereupon terminate. If a policy insuring the
lien of a mortgage is issued simultaneously with this policy
and for simultaneous issue premium as provided in rate
schedule any payment by the Company on said mortgage
policy with respect to the real estate described in Schedule
A hereof shall reduce pro tanto the liability under this policy.
All actions or proceedings against the Company must be
based on the provisions of this policy. Any other action or
actions or rights of action that the insured may have or may
bring against the Company with respect to services rendered
in connection with the issuance of this policy, are merged
herein and shall be enforceable only under the terms, con-
ditions and limitations of this policy.
4. The following terms when used in this policy mean:
(a) "named insured": the persons and corporations named
as insured in Schedule A of this policy: (b) "the insured":
such named insured together with (1 ) each successor in
ownership of any indebtedness secured by any mortgage
shown in Item 3 of Schedule A, (2) any owner or successor
in ownership of any such indebtedness who acquires title
to the real estate described in Item 4 of Schedule A, or
any part thereof, by lawful means in satisfaction of said
indebtedness or any part thereof, (3) any governmental
agency or instrumentality which insures or guarantees
said indebtedness or any part thereof, and (4) any person
or corporation deriving an estate or interest in said real
estate as an heir or devisee of a named insured or by
reason of the dissolution, merger, or consolidation of a
corporate named insured; (c) "date hereof': the exact
day, hour and minute specified in Schedule A; (d) "pub-
lic records": records which, under the recording law,
impart constructive notice with respect to said real
estate; (e) "home office": the office of the Company at
the address shown hereon; (t) "mortgage": mortgage,
deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument
described in Schedule A.
5. All notices required to be given the Company and any
statement in writing required to be furnished the Company
shall include the number of this policy and shall be ad-
dressed to it at the office which issued this policy or to its
Home Office, Claims Department, 433 South Spring Street,
P.O. Box 54730, Lor )geles, California 90054.
TO 1484 WA (1-76) Washington Land Title Association Standard Form Policy
JG
Schedule A
No. Date of Policy:
F-186551 I JULY 7, 1976 AT 9:00 A.M.
Amount of Insurance Premium
$ 6,500.00 $ 60.50
1. Name of Insured:
THE CITY OF EDMONDS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
2. Title to the estate, lien or interest insured by this policy is vested in:
THE NAMED INSURED
3. Estate, lien or interest insured:
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
4. Description of the Real Estate with respect to which this policy is issued:
THE EAST 330 FEET OF TRACT 25, PUGET SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT FIVE
ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5
OF PLATS., PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Schedule B
F-186551
DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER MATTERS AGAINST WHICH THE COMPANY DOES NOT INSURE:
All matters set forth in paragraphs numbered 1 to 4, inclusive, in the inside cover sheet of this policy under the heading
Schedule B General Exceptions.
Special Exceptions:
1. COVENANT AND AGREEMENT BY L. J. BIGELOW, J. L. ANDERSON AND
C. C. BIGELOW.. CONTAINED IN AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 10, 1921,
RECORDED MARCH 8, 1922, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2952440 THAT SUSIE
A. KITTRIDGE, THEN OWNER OF TRACT 17 IN PUGET SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT
FIVE ACRE TRACTS, HER SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL HAVE PRIVILETE
OF FREE USE OF WATER FROM THE PIPE LINE OF SAID BIGELOW, ANDERSON
AND BI.GELOW AND THAT THEY WILL ATTACH TO THEIR PIPE LINE AND KEEP IN
ORDER FOR HER USE A PIPE NOT LESS THAN ONE INCH IN SIZE WITH PROPER
FAUCET FOR TURNING ON AND SHUTTING OFF THE WATER TO BE SO PLACED
AS TO BE CONVENIENT FOR ATTACHING PIPES AND USE OF WATER.
"END OF SCHEDULE B"
TO 1919.1 PNTI WA (5-75)
ENDORSEMENT FORM WA 10-R'
OWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT
ATTACHED TO POLICY NO. F-18 6 5 51
ISSUED BY
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending
to provide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies
said Policy, as follows:
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance
provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual
upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified.
2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Endorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the
first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in
Schedule A of the Policy to which this Endorsement is attached, and on each succeeding
January 1.
3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by
increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may
have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Endorsement) by the same percentage,
if any; by which the 'United States Department -of .Commerce -Composite•-Construction Cost--
Index (ban period 1967Mor the month --of -September immediately pieceding -exceeds-thu
highest Index number for the month of September in any previous year which is subsequent
to Date of Policy; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall
never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the
amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms of the Conditions and
Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment
in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost
Index.
4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of
insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which
the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as
of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first
occur.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said
Policy.
This Endorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and
stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof.
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
By
President
Attest:
g. l Secretary
NOTE: In connection -with a future application for title insurance covering said land, reissue credit
on premium charges (-if applicable -at all) will be allowed only upon the original face amount of
insurance as stated in Schedule A of said Policy.
-- ISSUED BY -
PIONEER NATIONAL
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
SNOHOISH COUNTY OFFICE
EVERETT, WASH.
�r
J
PIONEER NATIONAITITIE INSURANCE
ATICOR COMPANY
APPRAISAL REPORT
of
THE HOWARD DENT, JR. PROPERTY
South Side of 196th Southwest
Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington
JUKE 1967
Made For
CITY OF EDMONDS
Snahorniah County, Washington
$fir: Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
EARL L. STAY
REAL ESTATE APPRAISER & CONSULTANT
1603 NORTHWEST 1BSTH STREET
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9B177
LINCOLN 6-1137
City of Edmonds
Snohomish County, Washington
aurae, i7
Be: Appraisal of Howard Dent, Jr.
Praperty on South. Side of 196th g.W.
Edmonds, Snohomish County, Wn.
Attention: Mr. D. C. Lawson., City Supervisor
Civic Center
250 Fifth Ave. North
Edmonds.. 'Washington
Dear fir. Lawson:
Pursuaryt to your request, I have made an investigation of the H. Dent, Jr. property,
legally described as the East 330 feet of Tract 25, Puget Sound Machinery Depot
Five Acre Tarants, Snohomish County, Washington; for the purpose of estimating the
Fair Market Value.
Fain Market Value is the highest price estimated in terms of money which the property
will brim if exposed for sate in the aspen market with a reasonable time allowed to
find a purchaser buying; with full knowledge of all the uses and purposes to which
the property is adapted,. No allavence has been made for remote, imaginary or purely
conjectural uses.
I have personally inspected the site and have exWnined a number of compar6bl.e
properties in the vicinity of the subject for the purposes of estimating the Fair
Market Value. The property has been appraised for its Fair Market Value as though
owned in fee simple. The opinion of value expressed is the result of and subject
to the data and conditions described in more detail in the accompanying report. No
responsibility is assuaged for matters of legal nature or questions of survey. The
appraisal report has been written so as to conform with appraisal wide of the
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, Olympia, Washington.
To the best of any knowledge and belief, the statements contained in the appraisal
are try and the information upon which the opinions expressed are based is correct.
The Fair Mark6kt Value of subject 21 acres as of June 23, 1967, is 6,250.
z certify that neither gray errployzeat nor my compensation for making this appraise)
are in any Way contingent upon the value reported. 1 have no direct or indirect,
present or contemplated future Interest in the appraised property.
Respectfull , submitted,
Earl L. Stay 17
Appraiser
Ks:hg
INTERA MY COMi] TEE FOR INC PROJECT NO:
OMDOOR JWRFATION
1018 East Union, 01,E pia,, Wash.
OPINION OF FAIR MA.RM VALUE
It is my opinion that the FAIR MARKET VALUE of the above captioned real property
is, as of the 23rd da,;, of June, 1967
VALUE BUORE TAKING $6250 VALUE AFTER TAKING $ Nil
TOTAL JET oc teasmm $ 625o
The property 3w been appraised for its fair market value as though ovned in fee
simple, or as encumbered only by the existing easement in favor of
The opinion of value expressed above is the result of and is subject to the data
and conditions described in detail in this report of �10_ pages.
No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature concerning the appraised
property, nor of questions of survey.
No fractional part of this appraisal is to be used in conjunction with another appraisal.
Such use renders it invalid.
A177LDAVlT OF APPRAI
STATE OF WASRINMN )
)SS.
County of King )
The undersigned,, being duly sworn, deposes and saja:
That I have personally inspected the property herein appraised on June 1, lop 22, 1967:
That to the best of iwj knowledge and belief the statements contained in the
appraisal hereinabove and hereinafter set forte are true,, and the inform tion upon
-rhich the opinions expressed therein are based is correct; subject to the limiting
conditions therein set forth.
That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with the
acquisition of Pru,)azty :for Outdoor Recreation and Open Spacei and that such appraisal
to the best of my knowledge has been made in conformity with the appropriate
State laws, regulation- =- ,d policies and procedures applicable to Egapraisal of
property for ouch p-wpo5es, and that no portion of the value assigned to such property
consists of items whieh are noncompensable andesr the establisiaed law of said State.
That neither m employment nor my ecmipeneation for making this appraisal and
report are in any way contingent -upon the values reported. :aerei.n.
That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest
in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised.
That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone
other than the proper officials of the State and the Contracting Agency., Until
authorized by Mate officials to do so, or until I am required to do so by due
process of l.avp or until I am released from the obligation by having publicly testified
as to such findings,
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me this - stay of , 1967.
notary pifolic for 9tate of mash.
Residing at:
OF
CONCLUSIONS
/�'��1 TAKING:
INDICATED VALUE BEFORE .iC1t ING:
VALUE
Highest and Best Use; Future Residential
Land Area Unit Value
2.5 acres $250
6250
WRpVAMERTS
Nil
TOTAL INDICATED VALUE
$6250
INDICATED VALUE OF RR&INDER:
Highest and Beat Use: Nil
Land Area Unit Value
$ Nil
IMPR0VAMM
$ Nil
TEAL INDICATED VALUE
$pail
BR&kKDOWN OF TAKING:
Land Area Unit Value
2.5 acres $2500 acre
6250
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No . ....................
Page No . ......................
Year of 1967
RECORD OWNER
1 A C PROJECT J
ADDRESS OF
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
OF PROPERTY
Howard Dent, Jr., LaMonte Shorett and Richard Rowe
South side of 196th Street S.W. adjacent to Maplewood City
Park, Edmonds, Washington
The East 330 feet of Tract 25, Puget Sound Machinery Depot
Five Acre Tracts, according to plat thereof as recorded in
Vol. 5 of Plats, page 47, records of Snohomish County,
Washington.
GENEFAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROPEF&Y
Tae subject site is an irregular shaped tract with approxima
330 feet of frontage on the south side of 196th S.W.; 483.10
Feet along east property line; a total area of approximately
2J acres. The site has highly irregular topoGraphy and
appears to suffer from damage problems. 196th Street S.W.
is a heavily traveled traffic artery between. Lynnwood and
Edmonds and is 10 to 20 feet above the grade of the subject.
All public utilities except sanitary sewer are available.
The surrounding neighborhoods are approximately 65% built
up with homes in the $18,000 to $307000 price range. There
is a moderate to strong demand for amenity properties in
subject area. The costs of development of subject land are
presently out of proportion to the marked; price of improved
sites. The topographyo poor access, drainage and lack of
sanitary sewer will limit use of the propert;; and extend the
period of time that the property would have to be held to
be economically developed.
VALUATION
Only the Market Data Approach would be applicable to the
appraisal of the subject unimproved property.
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No . .............
Page No. 1
Year of 1967
1+OKET DATk APPROACH
A number of current land sales in the vicinity of the subject
property were exmmined. These sales were carefully analyzed
as to the advantages and disadvantages as compared to the
subject property. Because of the lack of current sales data
of properties suffering from similar topograph-, and drainage
problems, a number of adder sales of nearly equivalent
properties were analyzed and adjusted upward for time
increment.
Correlation of current sales and adjusted sales indicate that
subject acreage would command a unit price of $2500 per acre.
Special emphasis was given to the conclusion of this
appraiser that subject property would be held for speculation
and could not presently be economically subdivided and
developed for building sites.
LopLarable Sale '- 1 with a unit price of $3319 per acre and
adjusted price of 3650 per acre is superior to the subject.
The irregular topography of comparable will not prevent
the site from being immediately developed. Comparable has
no apparent drainage problems and all public utilities are
adjacent.
Comparable Sale # 2 at $2138 per acre adjusted to $3100 per
acre is superior to the subject. Comparable has superior
topography, less drainage problems and could be presently
economically developed.
Cori ar~abla Sale -' 3 at $5140 per acre adjusted to $5900
per acre is considerably superior to the subject. Comparable
saas superior topography, drainage and can be immediately
developed. Site can be immediately subdivided into four
building sites.
Colnpa.rable Sale # 4 at $4285 per acre or $4500 adjusted is
superior to subject. This site can be immediately developed
into two building sites. Sales price without sewer
assessment indicates a unit price of $2100 per building site.
Comparable Sale{ 5j at $2200 per acre and adjusted to $264o
per acne is superior to the subject. Canrparable has superior
topography and drainage. Subject has superior access.
Acquisition by City of L,�rnnwood was not made under a threat
of condemnation and this appraiser is of the opinion that
subject sale had all the elements of a Fair Market transaction
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No . ....................
Page No . .................•....
Year of 1967
LA�'�1. APPROACH ( continued)
C2aarable Sale 4 6 adjusted for time to $3640 per acre is
also superior Uc tae subject because of topography and
drainage-,
.liaAL CORRELATION
Value of Lane 2.5 acres x $25M per acre $ 6,250
Value of Improvements
Nil
Fair Market Value as of June 23 :-967 $ 6a 250
Earl L . S*ayy (J
Appraiser
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No. ___
Page No. ......3.
Year of 1967
SUBJECT PRWMY
View of Subject Looking Westerly Along 196th gW
View of Subject Looking Daterly Along 196th SW
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No .....................
Page No. ........4...........
Year of 1967
CLYM APABLE SALE NO.: I
ADDS: West
end of 180th West at approx. 66th W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Reg. 230' E of I' of Hft' th S
280' to N la R Sty
th E 445' th N 280' th W 445' to tpb. Sec. 17-27-4
ACCESS:
unimproved road
L&ND USE-.
vacant
ZONING:
R 12
SIZE:
280 x 375
AMA :
2.41 acres
SALE DATE:
2-28-66
PRICE:
$BOW
INSTR(119,i4T :
k1D
E. T LX NO.:
148367
GRAMOR:
Louis P. Hall
Gam:
Russell Earl Smith
PROPERTY DETAM: Koderately steep hillside. Head egad road. Road frontage
and utilities. Adjoins property at
east lot line.
ANALYSISt
'TOTAL VALUE UNIT VALUE
Land: 2.41 acres 8000
$3319 acre
Adj. for time 10%
$3650 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No .....................
Page No. -------- 5------------
Year of 1967
CC 'ARABLE SALE NO.: 2
ADDRESS: West side of 82nd West South of 208th SW
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �A) W 4741 of R- of Tr, 40 East Ed onds Acres
W 474' of Sg of Tr. 5$ ri n
(C) Basement along N 101 of F�2 Tr. 4 & 8 20' of Tr, 5
ACCESS:
30' easement access
i.uTD USE:
vacant
ZO-TadG:
rms o
SWE:
164.73 x 474
AREA:
78,082 sq.ft. 1.8 acres
SAM DATR:
1-26-63
PRICE:
$3850
DWAM:
RW $+100 dwno $ 50 mo . 7%
GRAM : Peder N. Amundsen & label
Gam: A. P. & Mae L. Bourassa
PROPERTY T im: Westerly sloping rear land With sccerss by 30° unimproved
easement, Native trees. Some draiWe problems at rear.
All public utilities except sanitary sewer.
AN ' SIS:
Land: 1.8 acres
Ad j . for time 45%
TCM VALUE
$3850
UNIT VALISE
432138 acre
*3100 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No ..................
Page No. -�,-i-
Year of 1967
00�A?�4$T;s SAT. RTO.: 3
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7 Pixie Ridge, exc. E 1.501 tog. with easement for
ingress & utilities over N 201 of E 150' Lot 7.
Purchaser & seller agrees to deed to City of Edmonds
W 301 for road purposes after release of underlying
mortgage on whole tract.
AC,59easement access & unimproved st.
W" USE: vacant
ZONING: res.
SIM: lo4 x 243.84
AREA: 25,370 sq.ft• .583 acre
SALE RATE: 11-6-65
PRICE: $3000
DETAILS: WD
E. TAX NO.: 131853
GRAR: Lee Stacey- & Carolyn
GRANTEE: H. G. Dearinger & E. K. Tomlin
PROPER'Y DETA=*. Moderate to steep slope. Rear land with access by
easement and over dedicated but unimproved street.
ANALYSIS: TOTAL, VALU i3Nri" VALUE
Lana: .583 ac. �3000 $5140 acre
11.30 sq.ft.
Adj. for time 15% $5900 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No .....................
Page No........7.....
Year of 1967
OWI -AWE -B E SPIX NO .: �
ADDMS: 20901 80th Ave. W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 27,, Wi"lowrdal.e Gardens Div. J1. Except E 323'
ACCESS:
blacktop
1AND USE:
vacant
ZO ING:
RS 8000
Ste:
132.09 x 323
Ki A:
42,665 sq.ft. .98 acre
SAS DATE* 10-35-66
PRICE: $4200 plus $1403.52 sever
1HSTR[WT; 1 D
E. TAX NO..: 726387
O AMR: David Moore
GROM: Darold. Brekke
PROPMY DETAILS: Rectangular tract with 232.09' fronting 80th Ave. West.
Topograpi3y slopes toward rear to approx. 7' below grade
of fronting street. Rear portion swampy. Improved
with old abandoned house containing approx. COO sq.ft.
Structure is in poor repair with windows broken out.
Purchaser felt there was no value to existing improvement
and Douse would be razed when property vas developed.
Water,, power & sanitary sewers are in frontage street.
ANALYSIS:
Lands .98 acre
Adj, for time
TOTAL VALUE UNIT VALUE
$ 5603 $ 5718 acre wi
130 sq.ft.
without sever:
$2100 raw sit
$4285 acre
$4500 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No .....................
PageNo. .................---
Year of 1967
sever
COWAPA,RLE SALE NO.: 5
ADDRESS: 72nd West at 189th SW
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W-41- Nk* SWI,'- Sec. 17-27-4
.ACCESS: easement
LAM USE : vacant
ZO IM: R 12)000
SIZE: 330 x 66Q
AREA: 5,0 acres
SALE DATE: 5-21-65
PRICE: $11"Wit]
INSTRU.kTM: REC Vol.. 8M pg. 741
TERMS: $1000 dwn, $i0oo yr 6%
E. TAX NO.: not required
GPTC?Ra Nils & Rjordis Foss
GRANTEE: City of Lynnwood
PI30PWTY DWAILS: Sloping 5 acre tract with poor access and irregular
topography. Native trees. Puget Sound Power & Light
easement diagonals thru tract. Although acquired by
City, this appraiser was of opinion that transaction
was hazed on Fair -Market concept. City did not seek to
condo ( see dowa is a.rment) and price was based on
negotiation.
ANALYSIS: TOTAL VALUE UNIT VALUE
Land: 5.0 acres $11,000 d`p'2200 acre
Adj. for time 20% $2640 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No . ....................
Page No. ....... 9------------
Year of 1967
cwARA= saa No.: 6
Ai3D13ES6 3 20628 85t11 Pl . W
LWAL 31FSCRIPTION: Lots 9 & 1.0p Pine Ridge
ACCESS:
blkektop
LAND USE:
res.
ZONING:
res.
SIZE:
208 x 393.84
AREA:
810918 sq.ft. 1.88 acres
SALE DATE:
5-2-.63
PRICE:
$6950
DETAILS.
E. TAB. NO.
56785
GRANTOR: ff. E. Costa
GRANTEE: Robert F. King
PROPERTY DETAILS: Sloping tract. Some drainage problems. Partially
finished hou6e xi6.d contribution value of $2coo.
All public utilities except sewer.
ANALYSIS: TOTAL VALM UM1T VALUN
Lands 1.88 acres $4950 $2632 acre
T-agprovements: 200050
$69
Ad j . for time 40%
$3684 acre
Earl L. Stay, Appraiser
Parcel No. ._1-0
------------
Page No . ....................
Year of 1967