Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-06-02 Architectural Design Board Packet
OF EDV Architectural Design Board � o Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 www.edmondswa.gov Michelle Martin 425-771-0220 Wednesday, June 2, 2021 7:00 PM Virtual Online Meeting Remote Meeting Information Join Zoom Meeting at: https://zoom.us/j/95360544929?pwd=ZmdOREFORkE3RkRaeVdBRmpkNUxMZzO9 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password: 818962 Call into the meeting by dialing: 253-215-8782 I. Call to Order Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of Minutes 1. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 5557) Approval of Minutes Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Approve May 5th meeting minutes. ATTACHMENTS: • ADB210505d (PDF) IV. Audiance Comments V. Public Hearings 1. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 5558) PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building: The Port of Edmonds has applied for a new 6,650 square foot Port of Edmonds' Administration Building. The project site is located on a portion of parcel number 2703200415800 with an address of 471 Admiral Way and is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The proposed development is subject to the zoning standards in Chapter 16.55 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and general design standards in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. Architectural Design Board Page 1 Printed 512612021 Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda June 2, 2021 Background/History In 2017, the Port of Edmonds submitted a similar application on this site for a marine retail building (PLN2017-0030). The 2017 application also included a shoreline substantial development permit (PLN2017-0029). The design review and shoreline permits were consolidated, and the Architectural Design Board forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Hearing Examiner who issued the decision on design review and the shoreline permit. Design review approvals are valid for 18 months pursuant to ECDC 20.11.050. The Port of Edmonds filed the allowed one-year extension for design review; however, the previous design review approval has expired. According to ECDC 24.80.140.A.4 shoreline permits are valid for five years. Since the proposal involves the same developed footprint as the previous application the shoreline permit issued in 2017 is still valid for the subject application. A new design review is required however since the previous design review has expired. Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions. ATTACHMENTS: • PLN2021-0012 Staff Report with Attachments (PDF) Generic Agenda Item (ID # 5555) PLN2019-0055 Sunde Townhomes: The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development with associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Background/History See narrative Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff Report & Attachments(PDF) VI. ADB Member Comments VII. Adjournment Architectural Design Board Page 2 Printed 512612021 3.1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2021 Approval of Minutes Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Development Services Prepared By: Michelle Martin Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Approve May 5th meeting minutes. Narrative May 5th draft meeting minutes attached. Attachments: ADB210505d Packet Pg. 3 3.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Minutes of Virtual Meeting May 5, 2021 Chair Strauss called the meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 7:12 p.m. Board Members Present Board Members Absent Staff Present Lauri Strauss, Chair Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Bruce Owensby, Vice Chair Kim Bayer Joe Herr Maurine Jeude PUBLIC HEARING: PINE PARK 614 — PHASE 2 DESIGN REVIEW (FILE NUMBER PLN2020-0053) Chair Strauss reviewed that the public hearing for the Pine Park 614 design review proposal, which began on March 3, 2021, is still open. At that meeting, the Board took a first look at the project (Phase 1), received initial testimony, and prioritized the Design Guideline Checklist for the applicant to make improvements to the proposal. At this hearing (Phase 2), the Board will review the applicant's revisions and take additional testimony from staff, the applicant, and the public. Should the Board require additional information with which to make a decision, a specific request will be made to the applicant and the public hearing will be continued again to a date certain. However, if the Board finds that the record is complete, the public hearing will be closed and the Board will begin deliberations and make a decision on the proposal. She emphasized that anyone who wants an opportunity to speak at any future appeal of the matter and did not testify on March 3'd or submit written comments, would need to testify at this hearing. She invited those who wanted to testify for the first time to affirm that their testimony would be the truth. (Note: Those who testified at the Phase 1 hearing did not need to be sworn in again) Mr. Clugston explained that because the project is located in the Downtown Business (BD3) zone, a 2-phased public hearing is required for projects that require State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. At the Phase 1 hearing on March 3'd, the applicant presented the conceptual design, and the Board prioritized the Design Guideline Checklist and continued the hearing to May 51. The applicant has responded to the guidance from the Phase 1 checklist, and at this hearing, the Board will review the design for consistency with zoning, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Design Guideline Checklist. The Board may ask for additional information or close the hearing, deliberate and issue a Type III - A Decision. Mr. Clugston shared an aerial photograph of the project site, noting there is a mixture of multifamily and commercial development to the north, south and west, and primarily single-family development to the east across 5' Avenue S. He reviewed that multifamily, live/work, parking and loading are all allowed uses in the BD3 zone. However, the designated street front requirement along 5'' Avenue S triggers ground floor height and depth requirements, as well as other design standards. The Development Code requires a 15-foot setback from the west property line, which is adjacent to a multifamily -zoned parcel, and the maximum building height is 30 feet. Off street parking is required, and each of the units in Building C would have one parking stall. Each of the three units in the two buildings on 5'' Avenue S have two parking stalls, one for the live portion of the use and another for the work portion. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Pagel of 8 Packet Pg. 4 a Mr. Clugston reviewed that the two proposed buildings facing 5' Avenue S (Buildings A and B) are about 60-feet wide and 30-feet deep, and Building C, which is located further into the site, would be 30-feet deep and about 120-feet wide. As discussed at the Phase 1 hearing, the layout is compliant, but only if a subdivision is approved to create a lot line in between Buildings A and B and Building C. The parcel needs to be subdivided to allow the two eastern buildings to have the reduced street -front depth. Typically, the depth requirement is 45 feet, but if the site is less than 90-feet deep, the requirement can be reduced to 30 feet, which is what the applicant is proposing for Buildings A and B. With the subdivision, no open space would be required because Buildings A and B would be less than 120 feet long, and both of the lots would be less than 12,000 square feet. Staff is recommending a condition of approval to ensure that the subdivision happens. Mr. Clugston reviewed the design elements in the design guidelines and Design Guideline Checklist, the design guidance in the Comprehensive Plan, and the design standards in Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 22.43. As noted in the Staff Report, the design guidance from the Comprehensive Plan and Design Guideline Checklist was generally met when the project was presented for the Phase 1 hearing, so he will focus on the design standards in the ECDC. He reviewed the standards as follows: Massing and Articulation. Pictures were provided to compare the Phase 1 submittal to the Phase 2 submittal. The intent is to have a top and a base, and then mimic the historic building widths in the area. Typically, the older buildings in Edmonds are between 50 and 60-feet wide, and the two buildings facing 5' Avenue S (Buildings And B) will be 60-feet wide, and they will be further divided into 20-foot-wide units through the use o of windows, canopies, etc. There is a cornice at the top to provide a definite edge, and the base of the buildings is identified via the storefronts and different materials. Although the design standards would not apply to 0- Building C on the west side of the property, the proposed building provides differentiation for each of the units. a The applicant is proposing a top deck area, and the bottom area would be set off by some recessed garages. He Q noted that the exterior stairs that were shown on the Phase 1 drawing were not included in the Phase 2 drawing, LO so the applicant will need to advise on how the rooftop decks will be accessed. c • Orientation to the Street. The intent of this standard is to activate the street front, and the buildings that front on 5' Avenue S (Buildings A and B) will be built right to the eastern edge of the property line. The entrances should have a distinct expression, and the applicant is proposing a forecourt in the area beneath the canopies. • Ground Level Details and Canopies. The applicant is required to use a minimum of five design elements from the list provided, and the applicant is proposing to use detailed concrete, sconces, planters, medallions, etc. The entrances will be immediately accessible from the sidewalk, and canopies are proposed over each one. • Transparency at Street Front. The code requires that the space between 2 and 10 feet on the street -front fagade must be at least 75% transparent. Based on a quick calculation, it doesn't appear that the proposed design would meet this requirement, and the applicant will need to address this issue. • Blank Walls. The applicant is not proposing any blank walls on the fagades facing east (5' Avenue S) and west, and there will be some interest on the walls that face the alleys through the use of banding and different materials, as well as lighting along the alleyway. • HVAC and Utilities. A transformer will be located at the northeast corner of Building C, and he isn't sure where the other utility equipment will be located. However, it will all need to be screened or camouflaged, and staff is recommending a condition of approval to make sure that happens as part of the Building Permit application. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 5 3.1.a Landscaping. The site will be fairly well built out, and there won't be a lot of landscaping. The applicant is proposing several street trees, as well as planters adjacent to the storefronts. There will also be some small planters in the area between Buildings A and B. In addition, Type I Landscaping (two rows of evergreens, fence, shrubs, and groundcover) will be required on the western property line adjacent to the multifamily development to the west. The applicant is proposing one row of mixed canopy (deciduous and evergreen), as well a fence, shrubs and groundcover. The code allows the Board to deviate from the exact Type I Landscape requirements if they feel the proposal meets the screening intent. In this case, it probably does since the adjacent site to the west is developed with multifamily and the subject parcel will be developed primarily with multifamily, too. Mr. Clugston reviewed that, at the Phase 1 hearing, Ed Lorah spoke on behalf of residents of the Park View Twin Condominium Homeowner's Association, which is located just west of the subject parcel. He voiced concern about drainage and parking, as well as lighting. While the code primarily addresses the buildings that face 5' Avenue S, they were hoping the applicant would also address the western fagade. Drainage will be dealt with per code, and each of the units will have required parking on site. The applicant has provided a lighting plan for the Phase 2 submittal, which includes low cut-off lights and sconces on each side of the building. Because the site will be developed as primarily residential, there won't be any big parking lot lights. m Mr. Clugston advised that a written comment was received on May 4' from Patrick Allain, the property owner to the south of the subject parcel. He read the comment letter (Exhibit 10) into the record as follows: 2 4- 0 We are the owners of the property adjacent to the south side of the building site for the proposed Pine Park development. Our property has two buildings, a commercial building that is currently occupied by the Barkada 0 Restaurant and a 3-unit apartment building. After reviewing the project documents, we have a few concerns that 0. may not have been addressed yet: Q Buildings A and Parking a. There may be a safety concern regarding drivers exiting the parking. It appears that visibility may be obscured by Building C to the west and a retaining wall to the east. Both vehicle and pedestrian traffic should be considered. b. Since the parking access is located directly across from our apartment entrance, we are concerned about headlights shining into our units while exiting. 2. Construction a. Construction will always result in noise, dust and disruptions, but to the extent possible, we hope that these can be minimized. b. Since the private driveway is the only means of access for our apartment units and for restaurant deliveries, we would request that it remain available throughout the construction project. Mr. Clugston responded that because the proposed buildings will be located at the property line on the alley side, the Traffic Engineer agrees that mirrors or some other mitigation will be required to ensure safe access from the two driveways into the alleyway. There isn't a lot that can be done to address concerns about headlights shining onto adjacent properties. However, there are performance, noise and sediment/erosion control standards that apply to all construction projects to address potential impacts. These standards will be monitored throughout building construction. There may be some temporary disruption to the alley, but the Engineering Department will require a traffic control plan, and flaggers may be required at the 5'' Avenue S and alley entrances to ensure that traffic can get through during construction. Mr. Clugston said staff also has a few remaining concerns about the proposed project: Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 6 3.1.a • The Building C roof access that was shown in the Phase 1 submittal was omitted from the Phase 2 submittal. The applicant will need to show how the rooftop will be accessed. • It doesn't appear that the proposed design meets the requirement of 75% Transparency along 5' Avenue S. • Staff is proposing an additional condition of approval to require the applicant to provide and identify pedestrian pathways. • It is the applicant's understanding that trash service would be provided by Sound Disposal at the 5'' Avenue S curb. If that is the case, there should be some pedestrian markings on the alleyway to make sure that people in Building C can get up to the street. Another option would be to locate a trash receptacle on the alley at the southwest corner of the site. In the downtown area, most of the trash is picked up from the alley. Mr. Clugston said staff is recommending approval of the project with the nine conditions outlined in the Staff Report, as well as an additional condition to address alley access safety. It was noted that a wrong link to the Zoom meeting was published on the agenda memorandum that was posted on the City's website. However, a courtesy notice was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel with the correct link. Council Member Olsen voiced concern that people who relied on the City's website had the wrong link to the meeting. m r Augustus Bukowski, Edmonds, said his company owns the subject property and is the applicant for the proposed project. They purchased the property with the thought that it would be a great place to develop live/work units that allow self-employed people, like himself, to live and work in the community. Instead of developing one large square structure o that houses commercial or office uses with limited parking, they are proposing to develop the site with three small buildings. He noted that his company owns the parcel that is the alley, as well. He said his company, Seattle Luxury 0- Homes, is known for developing very nice, high -end housing in Seattle, and they want to share their great product with a the Edmonds community. He emphasized that the project is designed to meet all of the code requirements. If they Q wanted to maximize the site, they would have proposed a larger building with more units. Craig Pontius, Citizen Design Collaborators, said his company designed the project. hi response to the concerns raised by staff, he advised that the design team has spoken with Sound Disposal regarding the trash/recycling facility, and they indicated that both the 5' Avenue S and alley locations would be acceptable to them. The design team would be willing to work with the location that is deemed best for the community. Rather than doing exterior stairs to provide rooftop access on Building C, the applicant is proposing an internal stairway with a hatchway on the roof. Due to the height limits, a full -height penthouse would be problematic, but there are a number of products available to provide a mechanically -operated hatch that rolls back to provide safe rooftop access. This results in a much lower profile on the roof. Mr. Pontius concluded that Mr. Clugston did a good job of explaining the modifications that were made in response to the direction provided at the March 3' Phase 1 hearing. Ed Lorah, Park View Twin Condominium Homeowner's Association, requested clarification about what is being proposed for the 15-foot setback on the western side of the property. Mr. Clugston displayed the site plan, noting that the required 15-foot setback from the west property line can be development with pavement or a driveway, but no building can be located there. Bob, a resident of the Park View Twin Condominiums voiced concern about stormwater runoff and potential flooding on adjacent properties as a result of the proposed development. Mr. Clugston answered that stormwater from the site will be managed in accordance with current stormwater code. All stormwater must be dealt with on site through low - impact development technology, retention vaults, etc. He shared the utility plan, noting that the applicant is proposing two infiltration vaults to deal with all of the stormwater generated by the site. Mr. Pontius added that the driveways would be permeable, so the water can soak through them. The retention vaults will be tanks with no bottom, filled with rocks. As they fill with stormwater, the water will slowly percolate into the ground through the rocks. There will be an overflow that allows stormwater to flow into the City's stormwater system during significant storm events. Chair Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 7 3.1.a Strauss asked if there would be roof drains that flow into the retention vaults or if the roof runoff would just spill off onto the ground. Mr. Pontius said the roof drainage would be collected and routed into the collection tanks. Chair Strauss closed the public portion of the hearing. Board Member Bayer expressed her belief that the proposed project would add a lot to the area. She said several citizens have voiced their concern to her that, if the property is subdivided, no open space would be required as part of the project. She noted that other projects in Edmonds are providing even more open space than what the code requires. Chair Strauss voiced concern that the proposed project does not meet the design objectives for site design. The design objectives talk about: • The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscape features as an integral part of how a building interacts with its surrounding site and environment. • Open space for residential settings and creating green spaces enhances the visual attributes of the development and provides places for interaction, play, seating and other activities. • Site utility storage addresses trash, mechanical areas, noise minimization, etc. Locating the trash receptacles from 14 units on 5' Avenue S is not workable in her mind. • Landscape buffers that integrate natural landscape features and unique land forms. The applicant is proposing a single line of trees along the western property line rather than a double line. Mr. Bukowski explained that because the lot slopes, the building footprints need to be located as proposed in order to get the three stories necessary for the project, which is lower density than what is allowed in the zone. If open space is required, they would close off the oversized walkway that goes through the middle of the building and there would be no see -through light. Instead, there would be a long fagade facing 5' Avenue S. Also, because the site is not being developed to its maximum density, there will actually be more outdoor space for residents to the south, west and north if the project is done in three separate buildings with an approximately 24-foot setback between the structures. He concluded that there will be a lot of open space for the actual residents of the development, as well as those who surround the property, a lot more than would be afforded with a 5% open space provided at the building entries. He doesn't believe it would be better for the residents to do a singular structure, and the proposed design will result in a more appealing, residential feel to the neighborhood while blending with other residential development in the area. Mr. Bukowski advised that, due to the parking and backup distance requirements, the only other site design that would work would be a large multifamily project that would have much more parking and lot coverage. From a top -down perspective, the project will only cover about 50% of the site, and the code would actually allow up to 70% coverage. He pointed out that the design incorporates planters, trees and a variety of design elements. He expressed his belief that the proposed building would most likely have as much or more greenspace as the existing storefronts in the area. Chair Strauss disagreed and observed that the intent of the residential code is to create not only open space, but green space. It feels like the proposed design is really crowded with a lot of blacktop, and there is no intent to create any green space on the site. Mr. Bukowski asked if she would have that same concern if the blacktop were replaced with building, which would be allowed per the code. Chair Strauss answered affirmatively and pointed out that the area is residential. Mr. Bukowski clarified that the property is located in the BC zone, which is the highest density zoning in the entire City. The property is not zoned residential, but the project would add a residential component to the commercial space. He referred to an aerial view of the surrounding properties, noting that many of them are developed with large building footprints and significant blacktop. The proposed project will have a lower footprint than a large, multifamily condominium. Based on the pictures provided, he pointed out that the adjacent properties have no greenspace in front, where the proposed project would have trees. If they were to do an alternative design aside from the proposed townhome concept, the buildings would have a larger impact on the lot. He said he would support the argument for Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 8 a 3.1.a more green space if the property were zoned residential, but it is zoned commercial. The property already doesn't have a lot of greenspace, and they are proposing more than what is provided on surrounding properties. Chair Strauss commented that no one lives on the properties that are developed as commercial, but Mr. Bukowski previously mentioned the goal of providing affordable residential units for small business owners and their families. Absent open space, it isn't likely that the units will be desirable to families. Board Member Herr cautioned that the code would allow the applicant to develop a bigger, more dense building on the site. The Board is asking the applicant to do something that he doesn't have to do, and he is trying to be creative with his site planning by mixing it up with more than one building. The applicant could decide to develop the site to its full potential, and the City could end up with a worse project that is completely code compliant. Mr. Bukowski commented that there are already a number of requirements the project must meet, and if additional requirements cause even one of the units to be eliminated, the project might not be feasible. He noted that construction costs have increased significantly over the past year, as well. If the project is not approved, the next best option would be to construct a two-story commercial office space, which was formally approved by the Board for the banks. He said he would rather do a commercial/residential project, as it would be better for the community and fit with the integrity of the area. m r Vice Chair Owenby agreed with Board Member Herr. He expressed his belief that the proposed project would result in good background buildings. While it won't stand out or make a statement, it will be a pleasant building to walk by. He o noted that most of the development in downtown Edmonds is right up to the property line, and many of the buildings are �a bland and plain. As a commercial development, the project could be a lot worse. However, he suggested a few minor L changes could bring a little more green into the project. For example, something narrow and tall, such as bamboo, could a be planted along the walkway between the two buildings. Grass and a tree could also be planted between the two Q parking areas to create more depth. 'q Mr. Bukowski noted that the existing structures on the property abut the street frontage with no articulation, and the neighboring properties have no greenery, either. He shared a drawing of the proposed new buildings, noting that there would be planters in front of each of the units, as well as in the area between the two buildings. There will be a pathway between the two buildings, as well as a pathway behind Building C. The pathways will be constructed of some type of stonework. In addition, staff has recommended that the project be approved based on the condition of adding more pedestrian walkway. For example, they could add a pedestrian walkway in front of Building C to create a courtyard feel. He noted that the intent is to incorporate planters into that space, as well. Board Member Bayer asked Mr. Bukowski to share more information about the proposed landscaping on the western property line. Mr. Bukowski said Type I Landscaping is intended to screen adjacent residential development from the potential impacts associated with a large commercial development. However, in this case, the proposed development (8 residential units) is similar to what is developed on the adjacent property. Therefore, he believes they can accomplish the goal of separating the two similar building types by tightly packing the trees with ground cover and shrubs, as proposed. He said he would rather plant nice trees for the adjacent residents to enjoy rather than pack the space with conifer bushes. Board Member Bayer asked Mr. Clugston to share his perspective on the proposed landscaping. Mr. Clugston explained that the intent of Type I Landscaping is to create a dense buffer, typically between disparate land -use districts, such as commercial and residential. In this case, the proposed use multifamily residential, which isn't any different than the use on the adjacent property. The landscape code allows the Board to alter the standards if they think what is being proposed still meets the intent of providing a buffer screening. Because the wrong Zoom information was published on the Board's meeting agenda, Mr. Clugston suggested it would be best to continue the public hearing again to either May 19' or June 2" d to make sure that all who want to comment about the project have an opportunity to do so before the Board takes action. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 9 3.1.a Chair Strauss expressed her belief that providing individual trash receptacles for each of the units will be a problem. She suggested the applicant consider providing a single, large container near where the transformer will be on the north property line. Mr. Bukowski said he would continue to work with Sound Disposal to incorporate the trash plan they can best accommodate, but it is important to recognize that the locating a trash/recycling facility is prohibited by other zoning requirements. If the City prefers a single, large container, it may require leeway to reduce the parking or setback requirements, but that is outside of the Board's purview to do. He noted that other residential units in the vicinity have their trash picked up individually. Chair Strauss said she lives in Edelweiss, which has one large trash receptacle and one large recycling container for all of the units to use. Mr. Bukowski pointed out that Edelweiss is a larger building (17 units). If the proposed project was larger, it would be easier to put a trash/recycling facility inside the parking area. Their project is intended to be fee - simple townhomes, where the people own both the land and the building and there is no homeowner's association. He commented that the site is difficult to develop given the slope and the City's height restrictions. If they can't build the project as proposed, the property will likely be developed with a single, large building that will eliminate a lot more open space and push the building towards commercial. He would prefer to stick with the current design and work to find solutions. For example, they could talk to Sound Disposal about potential options for locating a large container or picking up the individual containers from the alley instead of 5' Avenue S. Board Member Jeude said she would prefer to not have the trash collected from 5' Avenue S., too. Board Member Bayer noticed that the color of the proposed s changed to a lighter grey. She said she preferred the dark color that was presented at the Phase 1 hearing. Mr. Bukowski said many people thought the darker color was ominous. The lighter color is an attempt to brighten the buildings for the community. Board Member Jeude asked how the applicant proposes to address the requirement of 75% transparency on the 5' Avenue S facade. Mr. Pontius responded that this calculation will be done as part of the final elevation review. Mr. Bukowski said the intent is to meet the transparency requirement, and it may require wider windows or additional doors. Mr. Pontius said the building articulation is intended to differentiate the three separate units in each of the buildings, but some adjustments may be needed to meet the requirement. They are trying to maximize as much window as possible, while still providing some structure to keep the building standing. Mr. Bukowski pointed out that many of the buildings in the area do not have 75% transparency, either. Mr. Clugston responded that, regardless of whether existing development meets the requirement, the current code requirement is to have 75% transparency on a designated street front. The Board has had discussions in the past where they would like to have some flexibility to address certain situations, but that is not currently allowed. Mr. Bukowski commented that the design could be modified, if necessary, to meet the requirement. CHAIR STRAUSS MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PINE PARK 614 PROJECT BE CONTINUED TO MAY 19, 2021. BOARD MEMBER JEUDE SECONDED THE MOTION. Bob asked if a survey has been completed to identify the property line on the west side. Mr. Bukowski answered that the site they are proposing for development is based off an official survey of record. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. \ APPROVAL OF MINUTES BOARD MEMBER JEUDE MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 3, 2021 MEETING MINUTES AS SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER BAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 10 g 3.1.a ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Mr. Clugston thanked the Board for their willingness to continue the public hearing to May 19'. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Board Member Herr announced that he will be moving out of state by the end of the year, which means he will eventually resign his position on the Board. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:27 p.m. a Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting May 5, 2021 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 11 5.1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2021 PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building: The Port of Edmonds has applied for a new 6,650 square foot Port of Edmonds' Administration Building. The project site is located on a portion of parcel number 2703200415800 with an address of 471 Admiral Way and is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The proposed development is subject to the zoning standards in Chapter 16.55 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and general design standards in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Kernen Lien Background/History In 2017, the Port of Edmonds submitted a similar application on this site for a marine retail building (PLN2017-0030). The 2017 application also included a shoreline substantial development permit (PLN2017-0029). The design review and shoreline permits were consolidated, and the Architectural Design Board forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Hearing Examiner who issued the decision on design review and the shoreline permit. Design review approvals are valid for 18 months pursuant to ECDC 20.11.050. The Port of Edmonds filed the allowed one-year extension for design review; however, the previous design review approval has expired. According to ECDC 24.80.140.A.4 shoreline permits are valid for five years. Since the proposal involves the same developed footprint as the previous application the shoreline permit issued in 2017 is still valid for the subject application. A new design review is required however since the previous design review has expired. Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions. Narrative The Port of Edmonds has applied for a new 6,650 square foot Port of Edmonds' Administration Building. The project site is located on a portion of parcel number 2703200415800 with an address of 471 Admiral Way and is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The site is also located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation. The proposed development is subject to the zoning standards in Chapter 16.55 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and general design standards in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010, proposed developments that require a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination are reviewed by the ADB in a public hearing. According to ECDC 20.01.003, review by the ADB in a public hearing format is a Type III -A decision. Attachments: PLN2021-0012 Staff Report with Attachments Packet Pg. 12 5.1.a 1,7c. 189" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Port of Edmonds' Administration Building File Number: PLN2021-0012 Date of Report: May 26, 2021 90 Staff Contact: Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager ADB Meeting: Wednesday —June 2, 2021 at 7:00 P.M. Due to COVID-19, a virtual public will be held via Zoom. The Zoom meeting may be joined at: https://zoom.us/i/95360544929?pwd=ZmdOREFORkE3RkRaeVdBRmpkNUxMZzO9 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password: 818962 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The Port of Edmonds has applied for a new 6,650 square foot Port of Edmonds' Administration Building (Attachments 1 — 3). The project site is located on a portion of parcel number 2703200415800 with an address of 471 Admiral Way (Attachment 9) and is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). The site is also located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation (Attachment 10). In 2017, the Port of Edmonds submitted a similar application on this site for a marine retail building (PLN2017-0030). The 2017 application also included a shoreline substantial development permit (PLN2017-0029). The design review and shoreline permits were consolidated, and the Architectural Design Board forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Hearing Examiner who issued the decision on design review and the shoreline permit. Design review approvals are valid for 18 months pursuant to ECDC 20.11.050. The Port of Edmonds filed the allowed one-year extension for design review; however, the previous design review approval has expired. According to ECDC 24.80.140.A.4 shoreline permits are valid for five years. Since the proposal involves the same developed footprint as Packet Pg. 13 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building the previous application the shoreline permit issued in 2017 is still valid for the subject application. A new design review is required however since the previous design review has expired. The following represents staff's findings of fact, analysis, conclusions, and recommendation regarding the design review portion of the project. II. FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant: Robert McChesney, Port of Edmonds Executive Director 2. Applicant's Agent: Meghan Craig, Jackson Main Architecture 3. Owner: Port of Edmonds 4. Tax Parcel Number: 27032300415800 (the project site is a portion of this parcel). 5. Location: 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds WA 98020 (Attachment 9) 6. Size: The project site is approximately 20,500 square feet. 7. Zoning: Commercial Waterfront (CW), subject to Chapter 16. 55 ECDC. 8. Proposed Use: New 6,650 Port of Edmonds Administration Building 9. Existing Use: The site is currently a gravel/paved parking area. 10. Process: Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010, proposed developments that require a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination (those that are not categorically exempt from SEPA) are reviewed by the ADB in a public hearing. According to ECDC 20.01.003, review by the ADB in a public hearing format is a Type III -A decision. B. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is required for this project because the proposed building exceeds 4,000 square feet of new commercial area and because the project will include over 20 parking stalls. The Port of Edmonds acted as lead agency for SEPA review of the project adopting the SEPA Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) previously issued for the project in 2017 (Attachment 8). Thus, the applicant has complied with SEPA requirements. C. NOTICE A "Notice of Application and Public" was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, and Community Development Department on May 7, 2021. The notice was not published at the library since the notice area was being remodeled. This notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site on May 7, 2021 (Attachment 11). The comment period runs until the close of the open record public hearing before the Architectural Design Board. As of the drafting is this staff report, no public comments have been received. The City of Edmonds has complied with the notice requirements of Chapter 20.03 ECDC and ECC 1.03.020. 5DIiiiX0l:I►1[o1_14:UT/1AVIereP/I►/I111111dI This application was reviewed the Engineering Division. Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 14 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Water and Sewer Availability Certificates have been completed and are attached for reference. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. E. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The subject site is relatively level (refer to page 2 of Attachment 3 for existing topography). 2. Soils: According to the Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area, Washington, the soils on the site consist of "Urban land" soils. 3. Critical Areas: A critical areas determination was made under File No. CRA2017-0095 for the parcel containing the proposed development site (Attachment 13). The critical area determination found the site to contain or be adjacent to wetlands (the Edmonds Marsh), frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas (seismic hazard), and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (Willow Creek). Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek: During the Shoreline Master Program update the Edmonds Marsh was determined to be a Category II estuarine wetland. Pursuant to ECDC 24.40.020.E, the buffer for a Category II estuarine wetland is 110 or 150 feet depending on whether certain mitigation measures are implemented. Willow Creek is an anadromous fish bearing stream with a buffer of 100 feet pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040.D. The Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek are separated from the subject property via the Burlington Northern railroad right-of-way. ECDC 23.40.220.C.4 allows development within an interrupted stream or wetland buffer where it is demonstrated a project is functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. The applicants submitted a Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment prepared by Steve Quarterman of Landau Associates (Attachment 6) demonstrating the proposed project is functionally isolated from the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek by the railroad right-of-way. Frequently Flooded Areas: The subject property is located within Flood Zone AE according to FEMA flood plain maps. Development on the site will be subject to the Flood Damage Prevention provisions of Chapter 19.07 ECDC This also has implications for height calculations which are discussed below in Section II11.b of this staff report. Seismic Hazard: The subject site is located within a mapped liquefaction hazard area. A draft critical area report addressing the liquefaction hazard is provided in Attachment 7. A geotechnical report will be required during the building permit review to ensure the structure is designed and constructed to standards related to liquefaction seismic hazards. 4. Wildlife: Wildlife associated with the property is typical of an urban environment. The site may be visited by song birds and small mammals; however, the site is primarily gravel/paved, so it is not currently providing any significant habitat value. S. Vegetation: The site contains very limited existing vegetation since the majority of the site is gravel/paved and is utilized as a parking lot. There are existing street trees located between the site and Admiral Way. Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 15 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building 6. Shoreline: The subject site is located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation of the Shoreline Master Program (Attachment 10). Due to the project's location within 200 feet of the shoreline, the proposal is subject to the requirements of the City's Shoreline Master Program (Title 24 ECDC). Shoreline requirements were reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in 2017 and the shoreline substantial development permit is still a valid permit for the subject project (Attachment 14). F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS This property is located in the Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone. The surrounding sites to the north, west, and southwest of the subject site are also zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). These surrounding sites are developed with various uses including parking areas, marina, restaurants, Yacht Club, Port of Edmonds offices, a work yard, and vacant land. The BNSF railroad is located directly southeast of the subject property. To the east of the subject site (on the opposite side of the BNSF railroad) is the Harbor Square complex, which is zoned General Commercial (CG) under a contract rezone (R-1979-4) and is developed with various commercial uses including breweries, gym, hotel, and offices. To the southeast of the project site (on the opposite side of the BNSF railroad) is the Edmonds Marsh, which is within the Open Space (OS) zone. A zoning map is provided for reference as Attachment 9. G. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designation for this site is "Master Plan Development" and the site is also within the "Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center" overlay. Goals and policies from the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center related to this project include: Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A. Promote downtown Edmonds as an attractive setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. A.1 Ensure that the downtown/waterfront area continues — and builds on — its function as a key identity element for the Edmonds community. A.2 Enhance Edmonds' visual identity by continuing its pedestrian -scale of downtown development, enhancing its shoreline character, and protecting and building on the strong visual quality of the "Sth and Main" core. A.3 Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, downtown commercial activity and visitors from throughout the region. A.4 Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development. Page 4 of 16 Packet Pg. 16 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building A.5 Support the development and retention of significant public investments in the downtown/waterfront area, including government and cultural facilities that help draw residents and visitors to downtown. A.6 Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the downtown, especially to accommodate the needs of a changing population. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal D. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity. D.1 Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas. E.1 Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. The Comprehensive Plan also provides the following specific goal for the Master Plan Development designation: Master Plan Development. The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is governed by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in an FEIS issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, as it applies. (2016 Comprehensive Plan, page 57) The proposal's compliance with the Port's Master Plan is addressed in Section 11.1 of this report. Design objectives for the downtown area addressing site design, building form, and building fagade are provided in the Comprehensive Plan (pages 125-127). Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center to encourage its unique design character and important place -making status within the city. B.1 Vehicular Access and Parking. Driveways and curb cuts should be minimized to assure a consistent and safe streetscape for pedestrians. When alleys are present, these should be the preferred method of providing vehicular access to a property and should be used unless there is no reasonable alternative available. Configuration of parking should support a "park and walk" policy that provides adequate parking while minimizing impacts on the pedestrian streetscape. Findings: The proposed development would not result in any new driveway or curb cuts. Existing curb cuts on Admiral Way will be used and improved to current standards and the Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 17 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building new sidewalk in front of the building will improve pedestrian access and safety in the area. B.2 Pedestrian Access and Connections. Improve pedestrian access from the street by locating buildings close to the street and sidewalks, and defining the street edge. Cross walks at key intersections should be accentuated by the use of special materials, signage or paving treatments. Transit access and waiting areas should be provided where appropriate. Findings: The proposed building will be constructed up to approximately 5 feet from the property line and the sidewalk. Pedestrian connections to the building are directly accessible from the sidewalk. B.3 Building Entry Location. Commercial building entries should be easily recognizable and oriented to the pedestrian streetscape by being located at sidewalk grade. Findings: The primary pedestrian entrances to the building are in the northern portion of the building that is highlighted by a taller parapet which makes that portion of the building stand out. It appears there will be two pedestrian entrances on the northside, one from Admiral Way, and three on the south side of the building. Not all entrances will be for the general public. All entrances are at grade. B.4 Building Setbacks. Create a common street frontage view with enough repetition to tie each site to its neighbor. Encourage the creation of public spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and encourage outdoor interaction. In the Waterfront area west of the railroad, buildings should be set back from the waterfront to preserve and provide a buffer from existing each areas. In the Waterfront area, site layout should be coordinated with existing buildings and proposed improvements to provide views of the water, open spaces, and easy pedestrian access to the beach. Findings: There are few buildings located on the east side of Admiral Way. The one primary structure is Jacobsen's Marine which is located approximately 450 feet to the north of the subject property. The new marine retail building will be located approximately five feet from the property line and sidewalk generally in line with the Jacobsen's Marine building. While the subject site is in the waterfront area, it is not located on the waterfront side of Admiral Way. The Shoreline Master Program has specific requirements for view corridors with the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline environment. ECDC 24.40.040.B.11.a.i requires a view corridor be maintained across 30 percent of the average parcel width. The parcel on which the development site is part of is approximately 1,600 feet long. The proposed building is 100 feet wide and the Jacobsen's Marine building is 125 feet wide. Together these two structures would only block 14 percent of the parcel width leaving well above the required 30 percent view corridor. B.5 Building/Site Identity. In the downtown area, retain a connection with the scale and character of downtown through the use of similar materials, proportions, forms, masses or building elements. Encourage new construction to use designs that reference, but do not replicate historic forms or patterns. Page 6 of 16 Packet Pg. 18 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building Findings: The building is consistent with the scale, proportion and character of other buildings in the Port of Edmonds marina area. The proposed structure is a two story building within the 30-foot height limit of the CW zone. B.6 Weather Protection. Provide a covered walkway for pedestrians traveling along public sidewalks or walkways. Findings: There are awnings along the walkways leading to the primary pedestrian entries to the building. B.7 Signage. Lighting of signs should be indirect or minimally backlit to display lettering and symbols or graphic design instead of broadly lighting the face of the sign. Signage using graphics or symbols or that contributes to the historic character of a building should be encouraged. Findings: "Port of Edmonds" is displayed on the west and north side of the parapet on the northwest corner of the building. It is uncertain if this is the signage that will be proposed for the building and signage will be reviewed by staff with subsequent building permit applications for signs. B.8 Art and Public Spaces. Public art and amenities such as mini parks, flower baskets, street furniture, etc., should be provided as a normal part of the public streetscape. Whenever possible, these elements should be continued in the portion of the private streetscape that adjoins the public streetscape. In the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor, art should be a common element of building design, with greater design flexibility provided when art is made a central feature of the design. Findings: The subject property is not located within the 4t" Avenue Arts Corridor. Landscaping along the front of the building and the street scape will enhance the public space. B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings. Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale. Findings: The proposed building is a two story building consistent with the 30-foot height limit of the CW zone. Awnings, significant areas of glazing, landscaping and change in materials provide pedestrian scale elements along the Admiral Way frontage. B.10 Massing. Large building masses should be subdivided or softened using design elements that emphasize the human scale of the streetscape. Building facades should respect and echo historic patterns along downtown pedestrian streets. Findings: The mass of the building is subdivided vertically and horizontally. The building displays a distinct top and bottom. Window variation, awnings, and roof form also help to break up the buildings mass. B.11 Building Fagade. Provide a human scale streetscape, breaking up long facades into defined forms that continue a pattern of individual and distinct tenant spaces in commercial and mixed use areas. Avoid blank, monotonous and imposing building facades using design elements that add detail and emphasize the different levels of the building (e.g. the top or cornice vs. the pedestrian level or building base). Page 7 of 16 Packet Pg. 19 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building Findings: The building provides variation in materials and form along the public frontage providing human scale elements. Ground level details include a brick base, landscaping along the western facade of the building, and variation and window display that help divide the building into smaller segments. The large storefront windows increase the visual connection from the exterior to the interior spaces and out. B.12 Window Variety and Articulation. In the downtown retail and mixed commercial districts, building storefronts should be dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that allow and encourage pedestrians to walk past and look into the commercial space. Decorative trim and surrounds should be encouraged to add interest and variety. Upper floors of buildings should use windows as part of the overall design to encourage rhythm and accents in the facade. Findings: The street front of the proposed building is dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that allow and encourage pedestrians to look in. Awnings add differentiation to the windows and the window pattern changes along the street front with the taller northern portion of the building have a larger expanse of windows the southern portion of the structure being divided in thirds by three separate expanses of windows. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the above goals and design objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. H. PUBLIC COMMENTS As of the writing of this staff report, no written public comments have been received. I. PORT OF EDMONDS MASTER PLAN The subject site is designated as "Mixed Use Area" in the Port of Edmonds Master Plan dated March 10, 2014. The master plan provides the following for the Mixed Use Area east of Admiral Way: A land lease between the Port of Edmonds and Jacobsen's Marine has been signed and approved by the Port of Edmonds Commission. Plans for developing a 10,000 square foot building for boat sales and repair are proceeding through permit processes. Approximately 36,000 square feet of this mixed use area will be dedicated to this marine retail space. Possible uses for the remainder might include parking, Port office and/or maintenance complex, and a building for community facility use. The subject proposal appears to be consistent with the above goals, as it will enhance the Port of Edmonds property consistent with the Port's Master Plan and provide of a new Port of Edmonds Office. J. APPLICABLE CODES 1. ECDC 16.55 CW: Commercial Waterfront A. ECDC 16.55.010 Uses The site is located in the Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone and subject to the requirements of Chapter 16.55 ECDC. Pursuant to ECDC 16.55.010.A marine -oriented services are permitted Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 20 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building primary uses. The Port of Edmonds Administration Office qualifies as a marine -oriented service and thus is compliant with the permitted uses within the CW zone. B. ECDC 16.55.020 Site Development Standards Setbacks: The minimum required setbacks for CW-zoned properties that are not immediately adjacent to R-zoned property are 15 feet landward of bulkheads for buildings and 60 feet landward of bulkheads for parking. The section of the Admiral Way right-of-way adjacent to the subject site is 60 feet wide, so the site well exceeds 60 feet landward from the bulkhead and is thus compliant with the minimum setback requirements. Additionally, the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way is approximately 100 feet wide, so parking is also more than 60 from the ordinary high water mark of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek outlet. Height: The maximum allowed height in the CW zone is 30 feet. The elevation views on Sheet 14 of Attachment 3 indicate the structure will be 29' — 9" feet tall to the top of the parapet. As noted above in Section II.E.3 of this staff report, the subject development site is located within the flood plain according to the FEMA flood plain maps. The City of Edmonds has decided to use the draft FEMA maps to determine which properties are to be subject to the regulations with regards to flood plain development including the requirements of Chapter 19.07 ECDC and the height exception provided in ECDC 21.40.030.D.1. Normally in the City of Edmonds, zoning height determined by measuring from vertical distance from the average level of the undisturbed soil of the site covered by a structure to the highest point of the structure. However, for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coast A Flood Zones (such is this site), then height is measure from the elevation that is two feet above the base flood elevation as identified from the application FEMA flood hazard map. According to the FEMA flood zone map, the base flood elevation for this site is 12 feet, so zoning height will be measure from 14 feet for this development. Compliance with zoning height will be verified at time of building permit review. Maximum Coverage: There is no maximum coverage for properties within the CW zone. Staff finds the proposal to be consistent with the applicable zoning standards of Chapter 16.55 ECDC. As always, the project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable development standards during the building permit review process. 2. ECDC 17.30 Fences There is an existing cyclone fence with barbwire on top of the fence surrounding the site. The application proposes to replace the fence with a new cyclone fence without barbwire. The new cyclone fence with slates with be placed along the northern property boundary and wrap around the east along the railroad right of way back to the vehicle entrance to the site along the southern end of the development. The new fence will be six feet in height and compliant with the requirements Chapter 17.30 ECDC. 3. ECDC 17.50 Off Street Parking Regulations Pursuant to ECDC 17.50.010.C.1, all new buildings within the downtown business area shall provide parking at a flat rate of one parking stall for every 500 square feet of gross floor area of building. With a proposed building size of 6,650 square feet, thirteen parking spaces are required. Twenty- four parking spaces are proposed, so the proposal exceeds the minimum number of required on -site parking stalls. Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 21 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building 4. ECDC 20.11 General Design Review ECDC 20.11.010 requires the ADB to review general design review applications that trigger review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The subject proposal required SEPA review due to the size of the proposed building (greater than 4,000 square feet of commercial area) and the number of parking stalls (over 20 parking stalls). ECDC 20.11.030 lists the criteria for Building Design and Site Treatment that the must be met. A. ECDC 20.11.030.A. Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets; Findings: All exterior building elements are harmonious with one another, the overall building itself, and are compatible with the existing commercial development in the vicinity of the site. 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area; Findings: The proposed colors avoid excessive brightness. Additionally, the colors are consistent with color scheme found throughout the Port's properties. 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level; Findings: Mechanical equipment has not been indicted on the elevation views. If future roof top equipment is needed, the parapet on the northern portion of the building is approximately five feet in height and could be used to screen roof top equipment. Additionally if rooftop equipment needs to be installed on the southern portion of the building, there is room within the height limit to screen the equipment from street view. Staff included a recommended condition of approval stating that all mechanical equipment and other utility hardware on the roof, grounds, or buildings shall be screened to mitigate view impacts from street level. Screening could include the use of architectural elements, landscaping and/or fencing. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. a. In multifamily (RM) or commercial zones, selections from among the following or similar features are appropriate for dealing with this criterion: i. Windows with architectural fenestration; ii. Multiple rooflines or forms; iii. Architecturally detailed entries; iv. Appropriate landscaping; v. The use of multiple materials; Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 22 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building Findings: The mass of the building is subdivided vertically and horizontally. The building displays a distinct top and bottom. Window variation, awnings, material changes, colors variation and roof form help to break up the buildings mass. 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. Findings: "Port of Edmonds" is displayed on the west and north side of the parapet on the northwest corner of the building. It is uncertain if this signage is what will ultimately proposed. Signage will be reviewed for consistency with Chapter 20.60 ECDC at the time of the associated sign permit application review. As conditioned, staff finds the project is consistent with design guidelines contained within ECDC 20.11.030.A. B. ECDC 20.11.030.8. Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be avoided. Findings: The subject site is relatively level and is almost entirely covered by gravel/pavement. As such, there is no natural beauty on the site that needs to be maintained. Approximately 750 cubic years of fill will be needed to raise the building pad above the flood plain. The total quantity of impervious surfaces will be generally unchanged from existing conditions. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. Findings: The project's compliance with the applicable landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC is discussed in greater detail in Section 1115 of this report. The provision of landscaping between the sidewalk and the project site as well as some landscaping within the parking area will enhance the overall site aesthetics. 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. Findings: The project's compliance with the applicable landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC is discussed in greater detail in Section 11.J.5 of this report. Properties within the vicinity of the project site are commercially zoned, and there are no immediately adjacent residentially -zoned properties. No significantly different uses are located adjacent to the subject site. With the subject proposal, landscaping within the interior parking area will be improved. Additionally, street trees and landscaping adjacent to Admiral Way will aid in buffering the subject site from the street while also providing visual interest to the site. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. Findings: All landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles will be protected by curbs. Page 11 of 16 Packet Pg. 23 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. Findings: A screened trash enclosure is shown in the southeast corner of the site. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. Findings: The trash enclosure will provide effective screen year round and the proposed landscaping will also provide year round interest. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. Findings: There are no areas of wood, brick, stone or gravel in lieu of landscaping proposed as part of this project. 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Findings: The applicant submitted a site lighting plan (Sheet 12 of Attachment 3). The applicants are proposing four pole mounted lights in the four corners of the development, under canopy lights and wall mounted lights on the south and east side of the building. The proposed walkway connecting this development with the right-of-way, new landscaping and the lighting provided, this development will provide a sense of welcome and activity. During the associated building permit review, the final lighting plan will be reviewed to ensure that the total power used for exterior lighting complies with the Washington State Energy Code and that the lighting is directed downwards onto the site. As conditioned, staff feels the proposal is consistent with design guidelines contained within ECDC 20.11.030.13. C. ECDC 20.11.030.C. Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Findings: The proposal is not for a community facility. Improvements within the public right-of-way associated within the subject proposal will be reviewed by the Engineering Division at the time of building permit review in order to ensure compliance with all applicable Engineering requirements, including compliance with any necessary upgrades to the adjacent sidewalk and/or street tree(s). 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Findings: The Port strives for general consistency between its properties, so any future street furniture at the subject site should be compatible with that of the surrounding area. As conditioned, staff feels the proposal is consistent with design guidelines contained within ECDC 20.11.030.C. S. ECDC 20.13 Landscaping Requirements Page 12 of 16 Packet Pg. 24 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building ECDC 20.13 contains specific landscaping requirements for new developments, which the ADB may alter in accordance with the design review chapter. The subject site is located within the Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone (Attachment 10). Properties immediately adjacent to the project site are commercially zoned and there are no immediately adjacent residentially -zoned properties. ECDC 20.13.000 gives the ADB authority to interpret and modify the requirements of the landscaping code (Chapter 20.13 ECDC), provided the modification is consistent with the purposes found in ECDC 20.10.000. Since no significantly different uses are located adjacent to the subject site, the site is part of a larger parcel, and since no side or rear setbacks are required in the CW zone, staff feels that the ADB could waive the requirement for Type III landscaping along the eastern, western, and southern site boundaries. If the ADB agrees that Type III landscaping is not necessary along these site boundaries, then two types of landscaping would apply to this project: Type IV landscaping adjacent to the street frontage and Type V landscaping within the parking area. The applicant's landscaping plan is included as Sheet 10 of Attachment 3. A. ECDC 20.13.030.D describes Type IV landscaping as: Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired to see signage or into adjacent space for safety concerns. 1. Trees shall be deciduous and planted 25 feet on center and the trunk shall be free of branches below six feet in height. 2. Plant materials which will cover the ground within three years, and which will not exceed three and one-half feet in height. Type IV landscaping is required along the northern project boundary adjacent to Admiral Way. The landscape plan (Sheet 10 of Attachment 3) indicates landscaping along this portion of the project site. The tree species, spacing and location of the street trees will be reviewed with civil plans for the development under the associated building permit application review. The landscaping adjacent to Admiral Way is also proposed to include a variety of shrubs and ground cover. Staff feels the proposed landscaping along the northern side of the project site is consistent with the intent and requirements of Type IV landscaping and that the proposed landscaping along the northern side of the site will provide a visual separation and soften the appearance of the building and parking area when viewed from the street. B. ECDC 20.13.030.E describes Type V landscaping as: Type V landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. 1. Required Amount. a. If the parking area contains no more than 50 parking spaces, at least 17.5 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. b. If the parking area contains more than 99 parking spaces, at least 35 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. c. If the parking area contains more than 50 but less than 100 parking spaces, the director — or his designee — shall determine the required amount of landscaping by interpolating between 17.5 and 35 square feet for each parking stall proposed. The area must be landscaped as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section. Page 13 of 16 Packet Pg. 25 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building 2. Design. a. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 150 square feet of area and must be at least four feet in any direction exclusive of vehicle overhang. The area must contain at least one tree a minimum of six feet in height and with a minimum size of one and one- half inches in caliper if deciduous. The remaining ground area must be landscaped with plant materials, decorative mulch or unit pavers. b. A landscaped area must be placed at the interior ends of each parking row in a multiple lane parking area. This area must be at least four feet wide and must extend the length of the adjacent parking stall. c. Up to 100 percent of the trees proposed for the parking area may be deciduous. d. Bioswales integrated into parking lot designs are strongly encouraged. e. The minimum area per planter is 64 square feet. f. The maximum area per planter is 1,500 square feet for parking lots greater than 12,000 square feet. Planters shall be spread throughout the parking lot. g. Shade trees are required at the rate of a minimum of one per planter and/or one per 150 square feet of planter. The proposal includes 24 on -site parking spaces, which pursuant to ECDC 20.13.030.E.1.a would require 420 square feet of Type V landscaping (based on a ratio of 17.5 square feet per parking space). The landscape plan on Sheet 10 of Attachment 3 indicates there will be four areas of Type V landscaping which provide approximately 1,000 square feet of Type V landscaping. Staff finds the proposal to be consistent with the Type V landscaping requirements of ECDC 20.13.030.D. As mentioned above, pursuant to ECDC 20.13.000, the ADB is allowed to interpret and modify the requirements of the landscaping code (Chapter 20.13 ECDC, provided the modification is consistent with the purposes found in ECDC 20.10.000. Since the site is surrounded by similar uses and since no side or rear setbacks are required within the CW zone, staff feels that the ADB could waive any landscaping requirements around the eastern, western, and southern side boundaries. 6. ECDC 20.60 Signs Signs associated with the proposal will require separate building permits and are regulated by Chapter 20.60 ECDC. The elevation views indicate wall -mounted signs on the northern and western building fagade above the main public entrance. The applicant has not requested any deviation from the sign code requirements, and all signs will be reviewed for consistency with Chapter 20.60 ECDC during the associated sign permit application review. III. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when approving proposed development applications, the ADB is required to find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for Page 14 of 16 Packet Pg. 26 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building the proposed Port of Edmonds' Administration Building under file number PLN2021-0012 with the following motion and conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICIES OF CHAPTER 20.10 ECDC, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGIULATIONS AND APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IS UP TO THE APPLICANT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH VARIOUS PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THESE CODES. 2. STAFF WILL VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPOSAL WITH ALL RELEVANT CODES AND LAND USE PERMIT CONDITIONS THROUGH REVIEW OF BUILDING AND ENGINEERING PERMITS. MINOR CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED BY STAFF AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT WITHOUT FURTHER DESIGN REVIEW BY THE BOARD AS LONG AS THE DESIGN IS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THAT ORIGINALLY APPROVED. 3. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND OTHER UTILITY HARDWARE ON THE ROOF, GROUNDS, OR BUILDINGS SHALL BE SCREENED TO MITIGATE VIEW IMPACTS FROM STREET LEVEL. SCREENING COULD INCLUDE THE USE OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, LANDSCAPING AND/OR FENCING. IV. APPEALS According to ECDC 20.01.003.13 and 20.06.150, Type III -A decisions are not administratively appealable but rather subject to LUPA appeal at Snohomish County superior court pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW. V. LAPSE OF APPROVAL According to ECDC 20.11.050.A, unless the owner submits a fully completed building permit application necessary to bring about the approved alterations, or, if no building permit application is required, substantially commences the use allowed within 18 months from the date of approval, ADB or hearing examiner approval shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files a fully completed application for an extension of time prior to the expiration date. For the purposes of this section the date of approval shall be the date on which the ADB's or hearing examiner's minutes or other method of conveying the final written decision of the ADB or hearing examiner as adopted are mailed to the applicant. In the event of appeal, the date of approval shall be the date on which a final decision is entered by the city council or court of competent jurisdiction. Page 15 of 16 Packet Pg. 27 5.1.a File No. PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds Administration Building VI. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Application Cover Letter 3. Project Drawings 4. Preliminary Stormwater Report 5. Traffic Impact Analysis Staff Report 6. Landau Associates Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment 7. Critical Areas Report 8. SEPA Documentation 9. Zoning and Vicinity Map 10. Shoreline Designations Map 11. Public Notice Documentation 12. Engineering Division Comments 13. Critical Area Determination CRA20170095 14. Hearing Examiner Decision on Shoreline Permit PLN2017-0029 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD Robert McChesney Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Edmonds 121— 5t" Ave North Edmonds, WA 98020 Meghan Craig Jackson Main Architecture 311 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Page 16 of 16 Packet Pg. 28 5.1.a City of Edmonds Land Use Application X ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT L CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE REC'D BY L FORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE RECEIPT # LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE 0 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE .i STAFF ❑ PB h ADB CC STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION C OTHER: • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Port Of Edmonds Administration Building PROPERTY OWNER Port of Edmonds PHONE # 425.774.0549 ADDRESS 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 E-MAIL bmcch@Sney@portofedmonds.org FAX# TAX AccoUNT # 27032300415800 SEC. 23 TWP. 27 RNG, 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Construction Of a new new retail (M), office (B) and maintenance shop (S) within a footprint of 6,652 sf. Exterior work includes a revised curb cut from Admiral Way, revisions to existing parking, relocation of and new parking lot lighting, new landscaping, building signage, canopies and sun shades. DLSCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Reference attached cover letter. APPLICANT Jackson Main Architecture, Meghan Craiq PHONE# 206.324.4800 ADDRESS 311 First Avenue South, Seattle. WA 98104 E-MAIL meghan.craig@jacksonmain.com FAX# CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Same as above. PHONE# ADDRESS E-MAIL FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this applicationonthe behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE March 25th, 2021 Pr ;GeWT Owner's Authorization �11, V_ Ma , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and cdFrect statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. c SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE March 25th, 2021 v r r I Questions? Call C m C O r R N .S E a to C O E W 4- 0 1r O IL N O O N O N Z J a in c d E z c� a 3 1r O CL O O N C O N O N Z J IL C N E t c� M Q Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application Page I of I Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 29 5.1.a JACKSO N I MAIN 1/ A R C H I T E C T U R E March 26th, 2021 City of Edmonds Planning Department 121 5' Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 re: Port of Edmonds Administration Building 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 JMA No. 20184 Dear Madame or Sir: Jackson Main Architecture is to permit a new Port of Edmonds Administration Building that has a footprint of 6,652 sf and includes the following uses: retail, office and maintenance shop. The proposal would redevelop a portion of land parcel 2703200415800 at 471 Admiral Way which is currently utilized as a parking lot. Exterior improvements include a revised curb cut from Admiral Way, revisions to existing parking, relocation of and new parking lot lighting, new landscaping, building signage, canopies and sun shades. The proposed project is Type II-B construction and is within the 200' shoreline buffer. The project is also within the wetland buffer around Edmonds Marsh. ECDC 23.40.220 (C.4) identifies development proposals within interrupted stream or wetland buffers as allowed activities, in which: Adjacent areas that may be physically separated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established structures or paved areas may be exempted from the prescribed buffer widths if proven scientifically to be functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. The director will require the applicant to provide a site assessment and functional analysis documentation report by a qualified critical area consultant that demonstrates the interrupted buffer area is functionally isolated. The director shall consider the hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection potential and the extent and permanence of the physical separation. We have provided the Critical Areas Assessment, written by a biologist that shows the subject property is separated from the wetland by the intervening railroad tracks. We have reviewed the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code (EDC 20.11.030). We believe our building design complies with the criteria in the following ways: • The development provides retail opportunities to the port in a convenient location. • The development provides a safe and secure office space and maintenance shop for the Port of Edmonds Administrative needs. • Exterior colors have been selected which match the existing color scheme found on various existing structures within the Port of Edmonds. JACKSON I MAIN ARCHITECTURE, P.S. WWW.JACKSONMAIN.COM 311 FIRST AVENUES. SEATTLE, WA 98104 p 206.324.4800 1 f 206.322.2875 Attachment 2 Packet Pg. 30 5.1.a JACKSON I MAIN 11 A R C H I T E C T U R E • The scale and height of the proposed building are such that is will not block views from the city to the Puget Sound. • The location of the proposed building is such that it does not block any existing building's views to the Puget Sound. • The proposed building is being constructed in an empty lot and will not replace any existing historical buildings. • Mechanical equipment is minimum and will be screened if located on the roof or will be located inside the building envelope. • Landscaping will be added to the site per the attached plan and rendering- enhancing the lot (which is currently not landscaped). • The development provides continuous access around the proposed building for fire prevention. Please let us know if there are any questions or additional material you need to complete your review Sincerely, Meghan Craig I Rm Associate JACKSON I MAIN Architecture, P.S. 311 First Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 206.324.4800 P www.macksonmain.com JACKSON I MAIN ARCHITECTURE, P.S. 311 FIRST AVENUES. SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attachment 2 WWW.JACKSONMAIN.COM p 206.324.4800 1 f 206.322.2875 Packet Pg. 31 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 Design Review Project #: 20184 March 2021 04 '. SITE F V r 1/I 4� Table of Contents: Site Data Existing Condition Site Photos Survey Site Plan Civil Plans Temporary Erosion Control and Demo Plan 5 Grading and Drainage •' ' Water and Sewer Plan *� Site and Steet Improvements and Traffic Control Plan y rt y • Landsacpe Plans Planting Irrigation F • Site Lighting Plan - r YV5 •. perspective Elevations Aerial View Decorative Fence Client Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 x Contact- Robert Mcchesney F'. Architect Jackson I Main Architecture t 311 1st Ave S Seattle, WA 98104 Contact: Katerina Prochaska Civil Engineer - CG Engineering, PLLC 250 4th Ave S, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 Contact Jared Underbrink Landscape Architect t Bethune Associates INC. w,. F- PO Box 1442 Maple Valley, WA 98038 Contact- Lauchlin Bethune 02 03 04 05 06 07 07 07 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 U r Q 0 Q. a� N O 0 r N O N z J d C N E a JACKSON I MAIN 1/ARCHITECTURE PORT OF EOM0HDS Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 32 SITE DATA EXISTING CONDITION Site Informa Project Address: 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 Jurisdiction: City of Edmonds Parcel Number. 27032300415800 Legal Description: SEC 23 TWP 27 RGE 03A PTN OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC (FORMER GREAT NORTHER RR CO) PRTY LOC IN SEC 23 & 26 DAF BEG AT INT OF E BDY ADMIRAL WAY WITH S BDY DAYTON ST TH SELY ALG S BDY DAYTON ST 205FT M/L TO EBDY SD BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR PROP TH SWLY IN A STRAIGHT LN TAP THAT IS 205FT S WHEN MEAS AT R/A FIR N LN OF SEC 26 & 220FT SELY WHEN MEAS AT R/A FIR E BDYADMIRAL WAY TH NWLY AT R/A TO E BDY SD RR 220FT M/L TO EBD ADMIRAL WAY TH NELY ALG E BDY ADMIRAL WAY TO POB EXC THE SELY 10OFT THOF Environmental Critical Areas: Total Parcel Area: Total Project Site Area: Total Building Footprint: Zoning Flood, Seismic Hazard Area 4.34 Acres 0.48 Acres, 20,880 sf 0.15 Acres, 6,650 sf (Approved under pin20170029 and pIn20170030) Base Zone: CW (Commercial Waterfront) located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation Current Use: Parking and boat dry storage Proposed Building Type: Office and maintenance space Site Development Standards: (ECDC 16.55.020) Allowable Site Coverage Min. lot Area Min. Lot Width Min. Setbacks Max. Height Parking Space Requirements: (ECDC 17.50.020) Business and Professional Offices Storage Warehouse: Retail: I � JACKSON I MAIN ►/ARCHITECTURE None None None 15' From lot lines adjacent to R zoned property 15' Landward of bulkheads for buildings 60' Landward of bulkheads for parking 30' w/ on -site customer service: 1 space per 400 SF w/o on -site customer service: 1 space per 800 SF one space per employee one space per 300 SF PORT OF E D M D II D S — , ` 8 MIN WALK i MERCIER FINANCIAL i� GROUP BLUE COLLAR DOGHOUSE BEE !SEN'S CONSULTING LINE c HARBOR 2 ATHLETIC 3 CLUB m c EDMONDS MARSH 2 c�a N E stiF a l`9�99G o F� E VICINITY Mj c m Commercial E o t '. WMU ftstgate Mixed Use V z�MEs; 89 Planned Business r BN Neighborhood Business ® FVMU Firdale Village Mixed Use 3 BC Community Business - BC-EW Community Business, BC•E-dmonds 1 0 rCL aP 6 CG General Commercial R-1979-4 0 Z SITE CG 2 Waterfront ns w - CW Commercial Waterfront f4 VW , MP1 Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use C14 a4+�♦y♦+•+•.MP2 Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use QMAI Other MU Medica(Use P Public Use Z ♦♦� s♦♦••4* •- 62 OS Open Space (L ZONING K ♦♦ ♦♦♦ 471 ADM I RAC WAY, i wy Attachment 3 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 33 SITE DATA SITE PHOTOS AERIAL VIEW MARINA BEACH. rL PARK �d IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE 2- PORT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE PQ T EDNIQNDS 3- SITE- NORTH PERSPECTIVE Attachment 3 4- SITE- SOUTH PERSPECTIVE NW STREET VIEW TO SITE FROM ADMIRAL WAY NE STREET VIEW TO SITE FROM ADMIRAL WAY 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 5.1.a i n -h', Packet Pg. 34 SITE DATA SURVEY -ss L � /1 �RETE 16" —13 0 16' O k 016 Z- ss ss ss ss ss ss `� ss_ ss ss- ANTHONY GUEST PARKING SIGN ��� — '* W* W* �V* 12 W* W* cn n invikin croior 2, \ 20' ROLLING TOWING GATE UTILITY TRENCH 5' CHAINLINK FENCE) W/ BARBWIRE ss coo RECYCLE AREA IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE GRAVEL — — — — — X 3 HOUR PARKING � 13� \ 25 MPH GRAVEL ASPHALT PORT OF EDMONDS GRAVEL GRAVEL \ ASPHALT � Ix \ \ W —12— VE GROUND POWERLINE Attachment 3 GRAVEL ABOVE GROUND POWERLINE Q ss - - ss- W* ss SHRUB BUILDING LINE CONIFER TREE — — — — — — EDGE OF GRAVEL STUMP VEGETATION LINE (D DECIDUOUS TREE — X — X FENCE TELEPHONE/COMM. MANHOLE GUARD RAIL T❑ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL P UNDERGROUND POWER LINE M GAS VALVE P+ RECORD POWER LINE p GAS METER —OHP— OVERHEAD POWER LINE ® JUNCTION BOX G GAS LINE © POWER VAULT G* RECORD GAS LINE © POWER MANHOLE SD STORM DRAIN LINE Q— LIGHT POLE SD RECORD STORM DRAIN LINE 0 POWER TRANSFORMER SS SANITARY SEWER LINE UTILITY POLE SS' RECORD SANITARY SEWER E— GUY ANCHOR W WATER LINE QD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE W RECORD WATER LINE ❑ CATCH BASIN TV CABLE TV LINE Co. CLEANOUT c COMMUNICATIONS LINE (FIBER OR V CULVERT AS NOTED UGT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EN-1 WATER VAULT RIGHT—OF—WAY R FIRE HYDRANT — CENTERLINE OF ROAD x WATER VALVE PAVEMENT STRIPING B WATER METER WQ WATER MANHOLE OR AS NOTED IRRm IRRIGATION VALVE HBo HOSE BIB Q SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE KRoo BOLLARD � SIGN ®� FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE . PK NAIL W/WASHER 6' CHAINLINK 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 471 ADMIRAL WAY , i na EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 35 SITE DATA SITE PLAN EXISTING FIRE / HYDRANT 16" \ O O� / 16 EXISTING PLANTER REVISED TO ACCOMODATE FIRE TRUCK TURNING F'"^" "' EXISTING STRUCTURE, N.I.0 IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE I° I I° I I° 2� MEMS. ADMIRAL WAY -----,--T-T- f o D SCREENED ROOFTOP MECHANICAL 114 EQUIPMENT AREA J \\ �j gBOLLARD o o - \ ow �\ W 24" F PQ OF EDIA0ND5 Q �U) - U) NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 6,652 SF FINISH FLOOR = 14'-0" > ® a (n L \ (n BOLLARD J o U) i U) / / MAINTENANCE A/ � � PARKING/LAYDOWN AREA III S S S S S S S S S TRASH ENCLOSURE 6' - 6" (9 PARKING STALLS) _ _ Attachment 3 U) J J Q U) 0 z Y Q a 0 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 EXISTING STRUCTURE, N.I.C. i n-1, Packet Pg. 36 CIVIL PLAN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND DEMO PLAN TOY 16 " \s - �� N _ / 16 �0 / HIGH VISIBILITY PLASTIC OR METAL FENCE FOR PROJECT CLEARING LIMITS/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AREA PER CODE BMP C103 — 2G' C \ I SHED/RECYCLE AREA TO REMAIN lrs 00 RECYCLE AREA SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. -- J TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND DEMO PLAN NOTES: ✓ \ ✓ \ RIM=11.51 O SD�50 1. CLOSURES (IF/WHEN NEEDED) SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH CITY, 48 HRS MINIMUM IN PVC SW IE=9.31 ADVANCE. 2"GONG NNE IE=9.21 12"COrvC _ 2. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL TESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS, CITY OF G* G* G' G* \ G. G* F GAfi G G* EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, AND ALL OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS \ � � SS SS SS SS SS 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE COMPOST AMENDED PER 2014 SWMMWW BMP T5.13. 3 � � S - - ADMIRAL WAY W* W W* W* W" W * — c W. W. W. INSTALL CB INSERTS ON ALL CB'S / 3 DOWNSTREAM 500FROM THE SITE IN 2, 8' SWINGING GATESf THE ROW AND AS PROPOSED CB'S _ 25 MPH C2' ON -SITE ARE MADE OPERABLE G GRAVEL _' X-xX- \ X `�.R_�T— % _—]7—�— REMOVE SIGN AND REPLACE PER C5.1 � 1 ' REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING x \ \ \ JUNCTION BOXES &POLES ON SITE, TYP T -LTfLTv GRAVEL \ TRENCH � �'------' \ GRAVEL \ REMOVE ALL FENCING ON -SITE STOCKPILE LOCATION. KEEP COVERED PER DOE BMP C113 \ \ \ INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE OR 1 4 ASPI-'.-`. \ \ \ ASPHALT STRAW WATTLES C2. C2. \ REMOVE EXISTING GAVEL AND ASPHALT \ PAVEMENT ON -SITE \ PLANTER SECTION TO BE REH 5' CHAINLINK FENCE W/ BARBWIRE TREE TO BE REMOVED WALL TO BE REMOVED `BLOCK WALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND DEMO PLAN SCALE IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PART OF EDNIQNDS REMOVE EXISTING CONTAINERS ON -SITE ^ ^ ... �.,.�. ..ems. ..«,.... eINSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C2. GRAVEL REMOVE EXISTING CONTAINERS ON -SITE ABOVE GROUND POWERLINE � � � J Attachment 3 C 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 i Inf, Packet Pg. 37 CIVIL PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE DRY SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES: µ � \ ✓ \ 1. SOILS REPORT 3 \ RIM=11.51 I SD SD I REPORT NUMBER: 152]002.010.011 6" PVC SW IE=9.31 12"CONC NNE IE=9.21 PREPARED BY: LANDAU ASSOCIATES 12 CONC SW IE=8.�6 _ G* DATED: DUNE 22, 2017 ASPHALT - G* G* G* \ G.G* 1 I 2. AMIN IMUM OF THORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND VVERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN DRY i5 SS \ I 1 I I UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC) AND SEWER, WATER AND STORM, AND A MINIMUM OF S' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND V VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM ANY CITY OWNED LINES. „�- - - - � I SS SS SS SS \ � SS I I SS I � 3. NEW/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (INCLUDING ROW): 19,884 SF OUTED BY CATCH B DETENTION PIPE THROUGH ROOF DRAINS. NEW BUILDINGSIDEWALK: 1, 33 FROOF AREA. COLLECOFFTED NEW SIDEWALK: 11,0 SF. RUNOFF BYCATCHBASIN I F COULETED - NEW DRIVEWAY: BASINS. BYCACATCH RUNOFFLLECED % } ADMIRAL WAY - - _ 9775F.R75 LANDSAPCING:1,8]75F. RUNOFF COLLECTED BY CATCH BASINS. BY BA - ROW SIDEWALK:1,124 SF. RUNOFF FLOWS INTO ADMIRAL WAY. w* W. w* w* w* W. TYPE II CB W/SOLID LID W W. 3 I I I RIM: 12.11 u IE (6" PVC W): 9.14 I i 3 IE(6"PVC SW:9.14 IE (6" PVC S): 9.14 I j I LL I ; I ✓� �^ 12.26 12.39 12.16 a _J 3 12.04 11.76 11.62 IE (6"PVC N): 9.14 _____ a L 11.62 ______ 12.76 kl ______________� TOWING 12,66 d =TOC: 12.66 A 4276 D II.i4 $ - OC: W4 D - TOC: 12.26 �� - A D - n AT�C: TOO: 12.12 __1 - - 31 12.48 3. 4 D _ 12.70 12'� D 12,26 12.4.Y 11.95 ON _ iN n-pro-Jro - .-- (2F STEPS @ 7" I 13 LF"6"PVC @0.5% 12.44 12.54 E P TRLItt UTENCN S: �\ \ 12.84 13.42 14.00 (2) STEPS @ ]" 12.53 13.11 13.69 ENTRY: 14.00 _4 _ D - TOC: 13.90 4` ` ---_` �--_- 13.40 \ 12.31 Y --- G /�O/ 2'X10'PERFORATED STUB XJ OUTCONNECTION / \ I , iqK �j C3.3 IE: 9.80 f ROOF AND FOOTING DRAIN e 12.48 - \ \ \ 2 A � 0 @ � \ \ \ MODULAR WETLAND SY RIMaz.os: L2..S WS) s PAVING LEGEND \ (2) STEPS @ 7" � \ \ y I IE IN (6" PVC 5): 9.47 � NEW ASPHALT 14.00 ,--` �� zT ENTRY: 14.00 \ a TOC: 13.91 13.41 u 4 IE IN (6" PVC W): 9.47 IE OUT (6"PVC N): 9.21 OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITY SAWCUT \ TOC: 13.91 I C3. e NEW CONCRETE 13. 2 14.00 13%t 13.24 (2)STEPS @7" PROPOSED BUILDING \ D \ GRADING QUANTITIES 13.42 FFE: 14.0 13.59 ® TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) 20 CU YDS TOTAL 2 \ \ 13.04 13.28 EMBANKMENT (FILL)- 530 CU VDS 13.69 \ TOTAL 550 CUYDS - ---------- - 14.00 13.32 ABOVEAR FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS LANDING AREA(1.5% MAX CROSS SLOPE) D ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE.PO NOT USE FOR ONLY THESEV VALUES ARE ATE. 13.61 13.24 BIDDING, PAYMENT, OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES. \ 13.97 13.51 2 2',10' PERFORATED STUB C3. OUT CONNERION D 13.43 13.16 =.5% rvv IE: 10.80 TOO : 13.87 13.78 SDCO, TVP 12.72 12,16 -MF-RiP AnR/F RiF-RiT-R1F-wT-wF MF-ALA vF, _ _ _______ ___ _ _ ____________ I 13.68 13.08 y� I TYPE CB 2 3 4 RIM: 12.17 C3. C3. C3. IE (6" DIP E): 10.67 TRASH AREA SEE ARCH PLANS I lrs / I 149 IF 6" DIP RECYCI E AREA i D 12.69 1 A GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1" =10' IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PQOF EDNIQND5 14.00 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE I N WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL I ALL AROUND, WRAPPED IN 8" MIN FROM WOOD. @� NON, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SLOPE AT 0.5% MILE FABRIC, SLOPE _ RF0.5%MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS I I ASSHOWN 6" DOWNSPOUTTIGHTLINE FINISHED GRADE TO CONVEYANCE SYSTEM @ 0.5%MIN. PLACE NEXT TO I FOOTING DRAININ AS 12.74 SHOWN ON GRADING & -I -- 13.25 12.]5 DRAINAGE PLAN 2.J9� 1 TYPE TYPE I CB 'CONTRA MAV LOCATE ° RIM: 12.45 ON EITHER SIDE OF 0 °O � O I IE (6'DIP W): 9.92 FOOT I NG DRAIN)' ^ 00 p 13.6 IE (6"PVC N): 9.92 p° o a n I 2 3 4 .q 0 °O^o c C3. C3. C3. LINE OF MAX EXCAVATION. 0 O ° o �Q 13.50 IF SOIL IS OVEREXCAVATED, REPLACE WITH LEAN MIX O O 0 o o 0 0 a u 13.00 \ CONCRETE - - 13-8 1 I _ _- 1 " � FOOTING - - - - - - - - �ABDVE J OROUNO PowERUNE *J FOOTING AND ROOF DRAIN SECTION L SCALE: NTS © THIS PLAN SET IS FOR A DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL AND W ILL ^ BE FURTHER DETAILED FOR FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT. Attachment 3 IEE11,11,11111DIPJIEll E, IIHI 1Ei:........................................................................................ IEIY":................................°......-----.................--------............,............ �CI'I"'II' II''��i�IINIEINII:I'',;I'�iIIIPIINfii� I[Ilhq:"riilU;lllll ................................................................................................. °..................,........... 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 In = Packet Pg. 38 CIVIL PLAN WATER AND SEWER PLAN /0 L / SS GS GS V�* W* 12" x 4" TEE (ALL FL) ---113 11) 4. GV (FUMJ) I e1 l"WATER METER AND SERVICE LINE 13 [4. I I Ss� FDC Q I w SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. ✓ � � RIM=11.51 6" PVC SW IE=9.31 y� `Z� t2"CONC NNE IE=9.21 12"CONC SW IE=gg 6 G* G* G* \ �G* G* G I \ I -- n -. SS SS SS SS \ -$K SS -. WATER AND SEWER PLAN NOTES: SD SD 1, AMINIMUM OF 3'SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE DRY UTILITIES(POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.) AND SEWER, WATER AND STORM. 2. AMINIMUM OF 5' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATER AND STORM LINES. G* SS SS _ W I \ I \ I / I I I / I I I I p I I ___ ______________ I I I I I I \ I I I I I � I I I I S I II I I I RECYCI E AREA I P I A. I 6' CHAINLINK 1-2- ABOVE GROUND POWERLINE ` WATER AND SEWER PLANS SCALE: 1"-10' IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PQ T OF EDIA0ND5 Attachment 3 C 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 i Ink Packet Pg. 39 CIVIL PLAN SITE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. SITE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NOTES: RIM=11.51 SD I SD 1, PI PE BEDDING AND TRENCHING PER CITY STANDARDS, DETAIL 2/C5.2. 6" PVC SW IE-11 12"CONC NNE IE=9.21 I 2. THE PAINTED CENTERLINE AND PARKING WILL BE RESTRIPED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PROJECT 12"GONG SW IE=gg.86 COMPLETION. G* G" G. G* G* I I G* TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NOTES: 1 3 WORKZONEI I \ I I C5. C5.3 I I I I 1. REFERENCE DETAIL I/C5.3 FOR TYPICAL TRAFFIC CONTROL SYMBOLS, SIGN SPACING, ETC. GS _ -SS 55 55 SS SS -SS SS SS \ S`5 - SS + SS I SS -___-----_ --------------- ---_ I c 2. WORKED BY THE TO OCCUR DURING STANDARD WORK HOURS, OR AS OTHERWISE II 1 --- DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS s WORK ZONE iI _ __ _____; _ ,�_ 3. WORKZONES I ADMIRAL WAY I WORK ZONE I: LANE CLOSURE SOUTHBOUND FOR UTILITY WORK PER DETAIL 3/C5.3. C5.3 C5.3 I I I I I / WORKZONE 2: LANE CLOSURE NORTHBOUND FOR UTILITY WORK PER DETAIL 3/C5.3. w. w* w+I:z w W. W. I I TYPICAL HMA 2 I WORK ZONE 3: SHOULDER AND SIDEWALK CLOSURE PER DETAIL 2/CS.3 AND DETAIL 4/C5.3. CS TVPICALTRENCH SECTION II 13 I I I I� UTILITY PATCH e CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 3 I I WORK ZONE 2'MIN SAWCUT _____ REPLACE SIGN II I I C5' I I 13 \F vi 1 2 4 i______ _________� 3 L__________j_ ___ _____ C5. C5. C5. _---- E I I Al D I ° D D 8 D. ° \ TOWING I Ss�O °r w — o� p G 3 \ SINGLE DIRECTION ACURB RAMP, TYP CS STREETTREES/LANDSCAPING PERD \-`\ - -- UTILITY LANDSCAPE ARCH TRENCH \ CS CONCRETE SIDEWALK L\ \ \ \ CS EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB \ 3 \ \ \ D \ I \ ° PROPOSED BUILDING p \ FIFE: 14.0 \ I ° e TYPICAL CONCRETE SECNON - ------ \ \ I - \ I I I I I \ I I I e I TYPICAL ASPHALT SECTION I I I � p y� I � � I \ I I �I I RECYCI E AREA I SITE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS SCALE: 1" -10' PAVING LEGEND - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITVSAWCUT NEW CONCRETE JACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PART OF EDNIQNDS --- -------------- ------- I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I i I I i -2 J \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOVE GROUND POWERLINE Attachment 3 C 4" MIN CONCRETE (BROOM FINISH) °p ,,�Q CRUSHED SURFACING C,,�Q C4 CboF Cb4 TOP COURSE III III -III -III -III- SUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL mmIIIFILL; TOP 12" COMPACTED TOA IMINIMUMOF95%RELATIVE COMPACTION USING AASHTO I— T-180(ASTM D1557). UNSUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED TYPICAL CONCRETE SECTION 2 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" ASPHALT CONCRETE WEARING COURSE HMA CLASS 1/2" PG 64-22 (WSDOT STD SPEC 5-04.1) V CRUSHED SURFACING �n � BASECOURSE(WSDOT �° b0 8Vp STD SPEC9-03.9(3)) �o Q'° - -III- - - SUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL O - -III-III-III-III-III FILL;TOP 12"COMPACTED TO III —III -III -III -III —II MINIMUMOF95%RELATIVE - - -III- - COMPACTION USING AASHTO 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1= T-180 (ASTM D1557). UNSUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION 3 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" EEJf'�"I:"IFi,Q;y°IIIII''llli:;l:;l I'rI::IIiF�;l:;''I::IIP^d`.:;�1fll';;I'4..Id:;-I'"IIII;;VIoI 11711CI1EE:........................................................................................ 1EIY^:............................................................................................... 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 i n(4 Packet Pg. 40 5.1.a LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANTING ROC OVE TYP LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 0' S' 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1"=10'-0" NORTH BASE MAP FROM JACKSONIMAIN ARCH.; SEATTLE,WA. TREE STAKES: TREES 2" CAL. OR GREATER- 3 STAKES PER TREE TREES 13/4" CAL. OR SMALLER= 2 STAKES PER TREE EXCAVATE-A2 OF ROOTBALL. MINIMUM 1 DETAIL: TREE PLANTING NO SCALE LONG D T ES BACK CROWN ADMIRAL WAY TYPE IV: STREET FRONTAGE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ®- -NEW SHRUB "MULCH B&B PLANT: REMOVE BURLAP& V'S�G�E' TIES FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL SOn MIXSIDESCONTAINROOTRNT: BCARB'Y SIDES OF ROOTBALL PACTED SOIL MIX 12 MEN. DETAIL: SHRUB PLANTING NO SCALE O g PLANT CENTER / ROW O $PACINGNU L'D O PLAN (TRIANGULAR) SET PLANTS @ ORIGINAL DEPTH @ FINISH GRADE, TO SPREAD MULCH. 2" MULCH (TYPH PER SPECS.) FINISH GRADE BACKFILL SOIL MIX (MIX PER SPECS.) EXISTING SUBGRADE DETAIL: GROUND COVER PLANTING NO SCALE PER FECT NOTE: INCLUDE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND * Indicates Drought Tolerant Plant Material Abrev. Common Name Botanical Name size trees: AFC Amanogowa Flowering Cherry Pmnus serrolata "Amanogawa" 6' hgt.B&B * BHM Bowhall Maple A—mb— "Bowhall" 1 1/2" ca1.B&B-Matched. 6' branch * CFP Capital Flowering Pear Pyms calleryana "Capital" 1 3/4" cal./B&B-Matched at 6' branch * EGA Emerald Green Arborvitae Thuja xcids.talfs "Emerald Green" 6' hgt./B&B shunt, * OLL One Luyken Laurel Prams lamocernsus "Otto Layton" I8"-21"widthB&B, Matched * SAR Sa —.. S--occa nscif h. 18" hg./cont. * SBV Spring Bouquet Vibu.um Viburnum onus "Spring Bouquet" 24" hgt./coat. symbols/gourd wears: * CR Chrislmss Rose Helleboms nigt, 1 gal./cunt. * DLY A Day Lilly Hemaocallis "Chioage Apache" 1 gal./coot. * DLY B Day Lilly He to is "Hail's Pink" l gal./cons. * DLY C Day Lilly Hememcath "Stella de Oro" 1 gal./cont. * DLY C Day Lilly Hemerocallis "Cheny Cheeks" l galJwnt. r/� * PACH Pachysandra Pachysandra terminalis 1 gal./cont. at 30" oc st triangular spacing RUBUS Rubs Rubus pedolobus "Emerald Carpet" 1 gal./con[. at 30" oc a[ triangular spacing SITE SPECIFIC NOTES © ROCK SPLASH. Remove ,,is i g subgmde l-foot wide by 6-inch depth from base of building. Remove debris from site. Place l0" depth washed cobble rock overexposed subgrede. Supplier to be approved by Landscape Architect prior to installation. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. Owner to secure all necessary permits per City of Edmonds requirements. 2. All work performed shall conform with the City of Edmonds, landscape and irrigation requirements, codes and specifications. 3. Locate, protect and avoid dismption of all above and below gadc utilities and site features prior to construction Contractor is responsible for any resulting damages during construction. Call beforo you dig st 1 (800) 424-5555. 4. Landscape Contractor to maintain site unfit Final Acceptance. Work to include weeding all beds and removing debris from site. 5. Hold all plant material minima. 3'-0" away from building to allow for plant gawth and maintenance around plant material. 6. Clean subgmde by removing all u,d,,i,,bl, vegetation including g.eses, weeds, blackberries, swtch broom and poplar seedlings including roots. Leave subgrade in landscape areas minimum 9" below paving in shmb beds. Remove all debris tom site. 7. Provide minimum 6' depth 70-30 mix from Corliss Resources;Enumclaw, WA, 253-891-6680, in all shmb beds. Scarify subgade by rototilling and add topsoil on surface. Add additional topsoil as needed to contour Shmb beds including required berms. 8. Provide minimum 2" depth fine blend ham-frr mulch to all planting beds. Mulch from Sawdost Supply, Kent, Washingon. Fill all planting beds and lawn areas to within l" of rap of all curbs and walks. Slope all planting beds to drain. 9. Provide one (1) year wananty for all plant materials and workmanship. 10. Verify all quantities shown on the plant list and plans. If discrepanmes exist between the gaphic representation and the numeric totals, the gaphic representation shall role. 11. All plant materials to be specimen quality with fll, symmehical trunk and fliaga, unless otherwise noted. Fertilize all plantings with "Osmacote 17-7-12" plant g.nules by Scott. Instoll 2 cups per tree Inge, than 3", 1 oup per tree I— than 3", 1/2 cup per 5 gal., 1/4 per 2 and 1 gal., 1/8 cup per 6" and 4" pots. Place at base of plan[ after mulch has been installed. 12. Insure proper drainage of all planting holes prior m installing plant materials. Ifplanling holes do not drain or if heavy clay soils are evident contact landscape architect. 13. Fill all planting beds W within l" of top of all curbs and walks. Berm all planting beds and lawn areas to drain. 14. Asphalt to be removed 3" from behind e,tmded curb in planting beds after paving is completed and before plant material is installed. 2"X2" HEM/FIR STAKE DRIVEN TO REFUSAL (24" MIN.) SECURE TO TREE WITH NON-CORRODABLE WIRE ENCASED IN REINFORCED DULL GREEN RUBBER HOSE AT POINT OF CONTACT TO TREE. DETAIL: CONIFER PLANTING NO SCALE LAYERAFTER NT (MULCH TYPE Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates, Inc. ■ Landscape Architecture & Planning, ASLA P.O. Box 1442 phone: (425) 432-9877 Maple Valley, Washington 98038 lauch@bethuneassociates. www.bethuneassociaws.com JACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PART OF EDNIQNDS Attachment 3 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 41 LANDSCAPE PLAN IRRIGATION ADMIRAL WAY IRRIGATION NOTES 5.1.a SHRUB SPRAY WITH 12" POP UP I D CONCEPT LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN 0' S' 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1"=10'-0" NORTH BASE MAP FROM JACKSONIMAIN ARCH.; SEATTLE,WA. IIISIIIILI °Ilj ��♦ _ FENCE PER ARCHITECT T-hIl- END FEED LAYOUT 1. litigation design and layout assumes minimum 80lbs. static water pressure 65 GPM at point of connection. Verify PSI and GPM, if discrepancy exists report to Landscape Architect and owner before proceeding. 2. The Landscape Contractor shall inspect the site and verify existing conditions and dimensions prior to bidding and construction. 3. Landscape Architect to have 48 hour notice to review pressm, test for project Provide owner with BackJfaw Cerrificatlon for review and approval. 4. Imgation plan is diagrammatic. Adjust pipe, valves and migafim heads according to field conditions and plant locations. Report any discrepancies to Landscape Architect. 5. Coordinate imgation points of connection and location of automatic controller with G=eol Contactor. 1-1/2" Water Meter by General Contractor. Coordinate all work with other trades involved. 6. All valves will be placed iv valve boxes in a ma=er which facilitates access for maintem oce. Locate valves in shmb and ground cover beds =less approved by Landscape Architect. No valve boxes in lawn areas. 7. All components of imgation system shall be installed and adjusted to provide adequate coverage and no over spray now buildings, SPRAY windows, or paved ara.. Contractor is responsible for providing a complete working imgation system. 2" POP UP 8. Contoctor is responsible for any damages to building and infrastructure daring landscape constmctim. 9. Bury control wves below mainline and tape to mainline every 10' o.c. ]0. Flush mainline befog installing valves. Flush me lines before installing nomles. Test entire system before back filling trenches. 11. Electric Valves and Bsekflow prevention assembly to be planed in below grade valve boxes and installed in shrub beds. Verify that valve W-a are not placed when plant materials are to be installed. Provide sleeving=da, all paved sarfaoas. 12. Provide full coverage to all lawn and shmb beds. Install additional imgation heads as necessary to achieve full coverage and ware, in all plantings. 13. 120 AC Electrical power source at contmll r location shah be provided by General Contractor. The Landscape Contractor shall make the final connect on Rom the electrical source in the controller. All wiring per L & I Codes. 14. All imgation heads to be installed pc pam icalar to finish grade unless otherwise specified. Place all lawn heads in lawn areas, 3" from edge of paving or badlina Place all shrub heads in shrub beds, min. 4" from bedline and min. 10" from all structures. CONNECT INTO BOTTOM INLET OF 12" POP-UP HEADS. 15. Wimademg the system: The initiation contractor shall install a cantonal dmin valve assembly. Donning the mainline shall be omplished by imm lmiag compressed air into the system through the quick coupler valve 9 the point of Wan-fi=. 16. Oman Win, working system to building maintenone, manage, upon completion and acceptance. 17. Locate all utilities befog digging. Call 1-(800) 424-5555. 18. Install imgation system in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. 19. Meant Rain Sensor near top of building. Place in approved location with Landscape Architect. 20. From eontrolle, install 3M-14 gauge single str=d direct bary win (DBY) with one spare yellow wire and one common wire m each ,,We box with co=ectlons and schedule 80 unions. All wire splices to be for wive co=actions: DBY-Di t Dory Splice by 3M. 21. Contractor to provide PDT File As -built dmwings to Landscape Architect prior to close-out ofjob. 22. Electrical control wives tobe spliced in control boxes omy. FENCE PER 22. Asphalt and/or concrete to be removed 2" from behind extended curb or sidewalk in planter. ARCHITECT 23. Install rock outcrops and/or dry creek beds prior to installation of imgation. 24. Provide one (1) year womanly for parts, materials and workmanship upon final acceptatce data from owner for work completed per litigation Plan. 25. Verity iv -site uvdergmund vault location Re, Civil Engimc, prig, to constmcton. All mainlines to he buried min. 18" depth below grade; lateral lines to be buried min. 12" depth below grade. 26. Sprinkler heads adjacent to head in parking, to beset on parking lot stripe. IRRIGATION LEGEND SPRAY Symbols 2" POP UP SHRUB SPRAY WITH 12" POP UP ZONE SHRUB DRIP ZONE EISTMG COBBLE SHRUB SPRAY WITH 12" POP I POINT OF CONNECTION DETAIL 1 .8" WATER METER BY OTHERS v°r- (WATER PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE -WATTS) "°.a °r ir.° 1.8" STOP VALVE - MUELLER �I SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNION �Jl srautcaxcs. 1.5" DEL CHECK ASSEMBLY � 2" MAIN LINE • "xorOc xH rauMsa sµioe va"Araora°Lx sxaue MANUAL DRAIN VALVE QUICK COUPLER 1" oD DETAIL Ec POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER NO SCALE �u w °aE eta -ram as, Fall - a aEiis a we xa ao x�a c=mon ax ° a.ZE M n of a ao.�es - s. 'Im F"'nrao.,rol o .1 x�� rr.it o 422",°° & n.IBO vH aaa,.ss eu� wx°o°a oat= vtw na s ten "'se ice m > a- Ma-E r`:srw nrMamarrvea aioiem+rs ox�oLOa `*ocoon „xa; = uw°ar m DETAIL: REMOTE CONTROL VALVE caxoon aanaiis, too Wm"ixsuunon a`: inx�c,.'n`o°flx rivi µo xraus "°'"` �° ^"° "LL�'� "'gym �� w NO SCALE DETAIL: BACKFLOW FREVENTER DETAIL: OUICK-GOUPLINa VALVE NO SCALE NO SCALE Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates, Inc. ■ Landscape Architecture & Planning, ASLA P.O. Box 1442 phone: (425) 432-9877 Maple Valley, Washington 98038 Iauch@bethuneassociates.--.bethiatic ociates.com JACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PART OF EDNIQNDS 471 ADMIRAL WAY, Attachment 3 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet P:g 42 SITE LIGHTING PLAN LIGHTS MOUNTED TO UNDERSIDE OF CANOPY, TYP. POLE MOUNTED STREET LIGHT ® � PM _ e ° DL ° 1 --jr -Q io io I I � JACKSON I MAIN ►/ARCHITECTURE NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 6,652 SF FINISH FLOOR = 14'-0 WP POLE MOUNTED DARK SKY COMPLIANT PARKING LOT LIGHT PM S - PORT OF EOM0NDS Attachment 3 _ oT FAVi7im POLE MOUNTED i STREET LIGHT i PM d U) U), U) U) U) POLE MOUNTED DARK U) SKY COMPLIANT PARKING LOT LIGHT PM 3 S S S S DL O LED CANOPY DOWN LIGHT, HEIGHT PER CANOPY WP EiEj LED WALL PACK, AT 20'-0" PM �', LED POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, AT 20'-0" 471 ADM I RAC WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 43 (n c m E t u Q t 3 0 Q. m 0 r U) N 0 0 r N O N Z J a c a� E ca Q .. ' 1 - a ��►'--��1`ielE � I�IIIIIU� rb`� / - ., �,. r.1r' •�aFl -S� .j;�i" �$[�"...ly ,'Harr N - - - �� h1.. r+ __,A y _ y � 'tom=• - - �� .��1 y;��4aidt ''�.�.. �' ���^ t �_ i � - �,y ��# ali . Rfi:''-`�:_ All � .v.++4^F,q. w.!%i/A rkrearmeow- - _ I-`� 1 a _ '�I F,� �• } �� 1 , a � ,r1 `�__; �`� yam• ; • � , : :. p \r ! --------------- I i rIyE { i -a WM a ✓ e ELEVATIONS ❑� ® ® 12 © F21 ❑5 �i �i so ❑9 ® 11 ❑7 so �i 29'-9" 26'-6" Part of Edmonds MEN M loom in NINE Jilin 1 • . - T I4e[.IS2:1VEEN1101►1 MATERIAL LEGEND 1- Smooth Metal Panel 6- Stone Masonry Unit Base 10- Corrugated Metal Panel (Vertical) 2- Pre -finished Metal Panel Overhead Door (Brick or CMU, Brick Option Shown) 11- Corrugated Metal Panel (Horizontal) 3- Roof Metal Coping 7- Aluminum Framed Window 12- Mechanical Screen 4- Storefront Glass with Spandrel glass at Upper and Lower Lites 5- Pre -Finished and Engineered Metal 8- Pre -finished 30" Aluminum Sunshades Canopy, with canopy mounted downlight 9- Wall Pack Downlight, at 20'-0" ► 91121p■:11ty/e111H1►1 5.1.a ® ® 12 1 IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PART OF EDIIQNDS Attachment 3 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 45 AERIAL VIEW 5.1.a I � JACKSON I MAIN ►/ARCHITECTURE EDIA0ND5 P1Ti%\10F_\I Vj1Xvi9 Attachment 3 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 I ■ Packet Pg. 46 DECORATIVE FENCE 5.1.a END & CORNER /— CHAIN LINK TENSION WIRE POST GRADE I I / \- I I III i L TENSION WIRE TRUSS ROD OPTIONAL, I I' SPECIFY WHEN REQUIRED. I I I I I I I I I w i 10'-0" [3048MM] MAX SPACING --' I H I ILu� I I I I L--- J L__J FENCE SECTION ELEVATION WITHOUT TOP RAIL & WITHOUT BARBED WIRE END & CORNER POST CHAIN LINK LINE POST I I / I I L TENSION WIRE TRUSS ROD III I OPTIONAL, SPECIFY WHEN REQUIRED. I I I I I I I I I w i 10'-0" [3048MM] MAX SPACING I !--' � I 1 I I I L___J L__J FENCE SECTION ELEVATION WITH TOP RAIL & WITHOUT BARBED WIRE FENCE HEIGHT END & CORNER POSTS LINE POSTS NOMINAL HEIGHT B-1 BAR LENGTH H-1 HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE B-2 BAR LENGTH H-2 HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 5'-0" [1524MM] 8'-0" [2438MM] 5'-0 5/8" [1540MM] 7'-8" [2337MM] 4'-8 7/8" [1445MM] 6'-0" [1829MM] 9'-0" [2743MM] 6'-0 5/8" [1845MM] 8'-8" [2642MM] 5'-8 7/8" [1749MM] 7'-0" [2134MM] 10'-0" [3048MM] 7'-0 5/8" [2150MM] 9'-8" [2946MM] 6'-8 7/8" [2054MM] 8'-0" [2438MM] 1 1'-0" [3353MM] 8'-0 5/8" [2454MM] 10'-8" [3251 MM] 7'-8 7/8" [2359MM] 9'-0" [2743MM] 12'-0" [3658MM] 9'-0 5/8" [2759MM] 11'-8" [3556MM] 8'-8 7/8" [2664MM] 10'-0" [3048MM] 13'-0" [3962MM] 10'-0 5/8" [3064MM] 12'-8" [3861 MM] 9'-8 7/8" [2969MM] 11'-0" [3353MM] 14'-0" [4267MM] 11'-0 5/8" [3369MM] 13'-8" [4166MM] 10'-8 7/8" [3273MM] 12'-0" [3658MM] 15'-0" [4572MM] 12'-0 5/8" [3674MM] 14'-8" [4470MM] 11'-8 7/8" [3578MM] NOTES: 1. THIS DWG CORRESPONDS WITH DWGS 1-1 1 10 & 1-1 130. 2. SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN CAN BE CHANGED BY MASTER HALCO ONLY. H-2 MASTER ANCHOR FENCE PRODUCTS I by Master Halco HA LC 0" Orange, CA COPYRIGHT Cp2GG1-2006 MAMR HALCG, INC. Phone No.: 800-229-5615 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. www.FenceOnline.com TYPICAL HIGH FENCE WITHOUT BARBED WIRED BY. JRR DWG: 1 -1000 DATE: 09-27-95 DIMENSIONS & SPECIFICATIONS REV: C LAYER: 1 REV DATE: 08-04-06 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'—O" JACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PORT OF EDNIQNDS Attachment 3 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 47 5.1.a C � ENGINEERING 250 411 Ave S Ste 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (425)778-8500 Fax: (425) 778-5536 civil & structural engineering & planning DRAINAGE REPORT Port of Edmonds Admin Building 471 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 0312612021 CG Project No.: 21160.20 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 48 5.1.a Table of Contents Section I — Project Overview Section II — Off -Site Analysis Section III — Permanent Stormwater Control Plan Section IV —Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Section V — Special Reports and/or Studies Section VI — Other Permits Section VII — Bond Quantities & Operation and Maintenance Manual C 111M ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 49 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 1 Section I — Project Overview Section I Summary Overview Existing Condition Developed Condition Minimum Requirements nuvruioini This drainage report has been written for a new building on a 4.34 ac lot located at 471 Admiral Way in Edmonds, WA (TPN: 27032300415800). The building will have a roof area of approximately 6,652 sf (0.15 ac) and the project's area of disturbance will total approximately 0.48 ac. The development also consists of a driveway, parking spaces, and sidewalk improvements along Admiral Way. The site is currently developed with asphalt and gravel surfaces used mostly for car parking and storage areas. The project will meet minimum requirements 1 through 9 of the 2014 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (herein referred to as the DOE Manual) and comply with those requirements as modified in the Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 (herein referred to as ECDC 18.30) and the December 2016 Addendum to ECDC 18.30 (herein referred to as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum). This report is for the design review submittal and will be supplemented with more detailed information in future submittals. Existing Condition The site is part of a 4.34 acre parcel which is elongated with the longer side being aligned parallel with Admiral Way. The area of work is located towards the southwestern end of the parcel and contains gravel and asphalt parking and gravel storage area. The site soils primarily consist of medium dense, moist fill soils extending to about 8' below grade. The top of the groundwater table was located at 9' below grade during the time of the testing in early June. More about site soils can be found in the Critical Area Report by Landau Associates in Section V. The site is located in a seismic hazard area and floodplain. The site is bordered by Admiral Way to the northwest, BNSF Railroad property to the southeast, and boat and car parking areas to the northeast and southwest, respectively. Water and Sewer utilities run along Admiral Way, and there are several catch basins and a storm drain manhole across the street from the site which are conveyed to an outfall in the Puget Sound. Developed Condition The project consists of the construction of a 6,652 sf building along with an associated driveway, parking, walkways, and Right -of -Way (ROW) improvements. The total new plus replaced impervious area (including ROW) is 19,884 sf (0.46 ac). Disturbance will affect 0.48 ac of the project parcel. Site roof runoff will be conveyed to perforated stub -out connections before being routed to an existing storm main on 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 50 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 2 Admiral Way. Runoff from other impervious site areas will remain unmanaged and be directly conveyed to the storm main via catch basins and conveyance pipes. The proposed impervious areas (including ROW) are as follows: Roof: 6,652 sf (0.15 ac) Sidewalk: 1,033 sf (0.02 ac) Driveway: 11,075 sf (0.25 ac) ROW Sidewalk: 1,124 sf (0.03 ad Total: 17,110 sf (0.392 ac) The new and replaced pollution -generating impervious areas are as follows: Asphalt Driveway: 11,075 sf (0.25 ac) Total: 11,075 sf (0.25 ac) AL C �M ENGINEERING '_:a q&OIL CDAfiPgrVV�qD Figure 1-1. Vicinity map (from Edmonds GIS). Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 51 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 3 a C CM ENGINEERING Figure 1-2. Map with storm pipe material (from Edmonds GIS). Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 52 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 4 Figure 1-3. Aerial Photograph (from Edmonds GIS). Minimum Requirements Stormwater requirements were determined per the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, ECDC 18.30, and the DOE Manual. This report is based on the steps recommended in Chapter 7 of the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum and Section 3.1.7 of the DOE Manual. The project is classified as a Category 2 because it will result in more than 5,000 sf of new plus replaced hard surfaces. Following the flow chart in Figure 1-4, Minimum Requirements #1-9 will apply to all new and replaced hard surfaces. Minimum Requirement #1: Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans: The stormwater site plan consists of this report and the civil drawings and is prepared in accordance with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the DOE Manual and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 53 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 5 Minimum Requirement #2: Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation that addresses the 13 elements of Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. See Section IV and the civil drawings. Minimum Requirement #3: Source Control of Pollution: All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the City. Mandatory Operational Source Control BMPs must be implemented by forming a pollution prevention team, good housekeeping practices, preventive maintenance, spill prevention and cleanup, employee training, inspections, and record keeping. See Section IV for a source control discussion and Section VII for source control guide sheets from the DOE Manual. Minimum Requirement #4: Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls: Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down -gradient properties. All projects shall submit an off -site qualitative analysis. A qualitative analysis of the upstream and downstream system entering the site is presented in Section II. Minimum Requirement #5: On -Site Stormwater Management: The proposed project is classified as a Category 2 per the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. However, since the site is located in a Puget Sound direct discharge area (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv), the project does not have to achieve the LID Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full dispersion. The project must evaluate an alternative list of BMPs. This is discussed in Section III. Minimum Requirement #6: Runoff Treatment: This requirement applies to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetated areas that will generate pollutants and be conveyed to the public storm system through stormwater runoff. Runoff treatment is required because the project will result more than 5,000 sf of pollution -generating hard surfaces in a threshold discharge area. This is discussed in Section III. Minimum Requirement #7: Flow Control: Projects must provide flow control to reduce the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions. However, flow control is not required for projects that discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (ECDC 18.30.060.D.7 a). The project site will discharge to the Puget Sound, and Flow Control is not required. Minimum Requirement #8: Wetlands Protection: Not applicable. There are no wetlands located in the immediate downstream vicinity of the site or the outfall into Puget Sound. Minimum Requirement #9: Operation and Maintenance: An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and On -Site Stormwater Management facilities. The party (or parties) responsible 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 54 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section I, Page 6 for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and maintenance manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site and shall be transferred with the property to the owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained in the appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken shall be kept and be available for inspection. Does the project result in 2,000 square icct, or greater, aFnLw plus replaced hard surface area? OR Does the land dcsturbing activity total 7,000 square feet or greater? tlly_es No Minimum Requircmcnts No. I through 5 apply Minimum Requirement No. 2 applies Next QuesWon Does the prejeLt add 5,0D0 square feet or mare of new plus replaced hard surfaces? OR Convcrt 0.75 acres or more of vcgctation to lawn or landscaped areas? OR Convert 2.5 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Yes Is this a road related project? All Minimum Requirements apply to the new and replaced hard surfaces and converted 4Viwgctatcvn areas_ All Minimum Rcquirements apply to the new hard surfaces and convcrtcd vegetation areas. Yes Yes Does the project acid 5,000 square feet or more of new hard surfaces? Yes Do new hard surfaces add 5011rro or more to the existing hard surfaces within the prvjcct limits? No Fife No hlo aidit ional requirements. Figure 1-4. Flow chart for determining requirements for development (Figure 3.1 in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum). C CM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 55 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section II, Page 1 Section II — Off -Site Analysis Section II Summa Task 1— Define and map the study area Task z — Review all available information of the study area Task 3 — Field inspect the area Task 4 - Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems Task 1— Define and map the study area An initial qualitative analysis shall document potential off -site impacts of stormwater discharges for each upstream drainage system entering a site, and each downstream drainage system leaving a site according to Section 6.2 of the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The downstream analysis shall extend from the project site to the receiving water, or up to one -quarter mile, whichever is less. Runoff from the site will be conveyed to the existing City storm main on the north side of Admiral Way via catch basins and pipes. The City storm main conveys stormwater northwest for about 445 feet until an outfall into the Puget Sound. The downstream flowpath is outlined below in Figure II-1 from the City GIS map. The site is located in the Puget Sound Piped Watershed. OUTFALL Figure II-1. Vicinity map showing stormwater flow path and distance to outfall (from Edmonds GIS). C CM ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 56 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section II, Page 2 Task z — Review all available information on the study area Existing stormwater improvements were determined from the survey, the initial site visit, and the City GIS map. Runoff from the site will enter the 12" concrete main which goes west through the Anthony's Homeport parking lot on the north side of Admiral Way. After about 170 lineal feet, there is a catch basin and the pipe changes to 12" PVC. After about 90 lineal feet, there is a manhole junction, and the outlet is 18" HPDE. The HDPE continues for 75 lineal feet, reaches a catch basin, and changes direction for 40 lineal feet before reaching another manhole. The manhole outlet is noted as an 8" pipe of unknown material, which flows into the Puget Sound in the Edmonds Marina, but this will need to be field verified, as the conveyance system usually would not change to a smaller diameter pipe right before the river. Further research will be done for this prior to future engineering submittals. The system conveys the stormwater around the restaurant and outfalls near the boat launch. Task 3 — Field inspect the study area A site visit was done on the afternoon of March 26, 2021. The weather was partly cloudy. From evaluating surrounding conditions, the site does not appear to take on significant upstream runoff. The project proposes to tie all roof drains to perforated stub -out connections prior to discharging to storm drain main on the north side of Admiral Way. There was not much to be seen from the off -site walk since the conveyance system consists entirely of underground pipes and manholes. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 57 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section II, Page 3 Figure II-2. From the north side of Admiral Way, looking southeast towards the project site. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 58 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section 11, Page 4 Figure II-3. From the project site frontage, looking northwest towards the storm manhole of proposed connection. C CM ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 59 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section II, Page 5 Figure II-4. From a downstream catch basin facing northwest towards the outfall. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 60 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section II, Page 6 Figure II-5. Facing toward the approximate area of the proposed outfall. Task 4 — Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems The site is in the Puget Sound Piped Watershed. The project proposes to route all runoff from the building to perforated stub -out connections beneath landscaping areas with a discharge to a public storm main on Admiral Way. Runoff from other impervious areas will routed directly to the public storm main, and no stormwater management BMPs are proposed. There are no predicted problems with the drainage system so long as the installation and maintenance of drainage facilities are done properly. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 61 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section III, Page 1 Section III — Permanent Stormwater Control Plan Section III Summary Narrative Feasibility Review Runoff Treatment Water Quality WWHM Nn rrn ti uo This project is classified as a Category 2 per the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum because it results in 5,000 sf or more of new plus replaced hard surfaces. However, since the project is in a Puget Sound direct discharge area, per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv, the project does not have to achieve the LID Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full dispersion. Runoff treatment is required for this project since the project has more than 5,000 sf of Pollution Generating Hard Surfaces (PGHS), and BMPs are addressed below. Feasibility Review The project must implement on -site stormwater management BMPs to the maximum extent feasible per Minimum Requirement #5. The following BMPs were evaluated per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv.A for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed: 1. Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW will be used for all disturbed pervious areas. 2. Downspout Full Infiltration Systems (BMP T5.10A) are infeasible because of the presence of fill soils extending to 8' below grade and a groundwater elevation of 9' below grade (according to the Geotechnical Report by Landau Assoc.). Groundwater elevations will be further explored prior to future submittals but our experience in this area shows that elevations can rise much higher. Often, projects have required anchoring systems for check vaults, grease interceptors, etc. 3. Downspout Dispersion Systems (BMP T5.10B) are infeasible because there is no room on -site for dispersion systems. 4. Perforated Stub -Out Connections (BMP T5.10C) are feasible and will be implemented for roof runoff on -site. 5. Concentrated Flow Dispersion (BMP T5.11) and Sheet Flow Dispersion (BMP T5.12) are infeasible because there is no room on -site for dispersion systems. Runoff Treatment The project PGHS is subject to Enhanced Treatments per the SWMMWW since the site is a Commercial Project Site. See Figure III-1 below for the flow chart used for treatment facility selection. The project will utilize an Emerging Stormwater Treatments Technology, specifically, a BioClean Modular Wetland System (MWS). A detail of the MWS is shown in the civil plans. A WWHM water quality model was ran to determine the design flow for the system. See below. 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 62 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section III, Page 2 Apply Pmtreatrriant ■ Presettling Pasln • Any Basle Ttaabn&nt SUP • F-marging Tech. Apply Infiltration + lnifltratl¢n Satin + triNtratlon Trench + Sloretarilban Step 1: 1&ntdy Pollutants of Concern and Ndorm Off -site Analysis to Determine Roceivind Waters Step 2: Determine If an Od Control Facility Is Required Step 3: Determine d Innitratan for Poi lutant Remova l Is Practicable No Step4: Determine If Phosphorus Carwol Is Reequlred lap 5: Determine if nhanrced Treatrnon V Required N Stop 6, Apply a Basile Treatmant Faculty ■ rBlkUtrabon, Swales 4 Fll w $trip + saskc Wetpond ■ Wetvault Treatment Wetlands Combined Detention++Netpod ■ Sane Flhm ■ Blaretentlan ■ Media FAer Drain ■ En"rog Tech. Vef Oply Oil Control Facility ■ API S parator ■ CP Separator • Linear Sand Flitter • Emerging Tech. Apply Phosphorus Control Faulty ■ Large Sand Filter ■ Large Welpwd' ■ Media Filter ■ Two Faclltty Treatment Trayr ■ Ernerging Tech.' Apply an Enhanced Treatment Facility + Latgle Sane Filler + Treatment Wedane + Compost -amended Vage Md Flitter SWP + Two Faalty Treatment Traln + Sloretantio-n + Media Fester Drain + Emerging Tech_ '44hm Phoi�Phorus Control and Enhanced treatrrleet are required, the Large VV&4mne and certaln CyW of ernerging techrwkx u*s wltl no! meal bath types of treatrwnt requirements. A different or an addkimal tr atinent FwIW will be mqulrad to meet Enhanced Ireattrimt. Figure -.1.1 IN Treatment Facility Selection Flog Chart DEPARTMENT OF ReYlsed Deaembef 2015 ECOLOGY P1�ase sae fitgarh►�ww_ecy.wa.ga�fcopyrigrtr.firmrfor cc yrlght notice rnctud, peimissims, State 4f Washington IimitaUan of gab4lty, and dl:sclalmex_ C � ENGINEERING Figure III-1. DOE Treatment Facility Selection Flow Chart. Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 63 5.1.a WWHM2012 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: Port of Edmonds Admin Building Water Quality 03.19.21 Site Name: Site Address: City Report Date: 3/19/2021 MGS Regoin Puget East Data Start 1901/10/1 Data End : 2058/09/30 DOT Data Number: 03 Version Date: 2019/09/13 Version : 4.2.17 Low Flow Threshold for POC 1 : 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC 1: 50 year PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre C, Forest, Flat .31 Pervious Total 0.31 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.31 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater MITIGATED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No GroundWater: No Attachment 4 1Packet Pg. 64 5.1.a Pervious Land Use acre C, Lawn, Flat .04 Pervious Total 0.04 Impervious Land Use acre DRIVEWAYS FLAT 0.25 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.02 Impervious Total 0.27 Basin Total 0.31 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow ANALYSIS RESULTS Stream Protection Duration Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.31 Total Impervious Area:O Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.04 Total Impervious Area:0.27 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.005929 5 year 0.009089 10 year 0.01079 25 year 0.012511 50 year 0.01353 100 year 0.014366 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.068575 5 year 0.090983 10 year 0.107124 25 year 0.129055 50 year 0.146544 100 year 0.165049 Groundwater POC #1 POC #1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 65 5.1.a Stream Protection Duration Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1902 0.008 0.075 1903 0.003 0.084 1904 0.006 0.098 1905 0.003 0.045 1906 0.001 0.050 1907 0.009 0.070 1908 0.006 0.061 1909 0.006 0.077 1910 0.010 0.072 1911 0.005 0.073 1912 0.019 0.126 1913 0.009 0.044 1914 0.003 0.178 1915 0.003 0.047 1916 0.005 0.073 1917 0.002 0.046 1918 0.006 0.067 1919 0.004 0.040 1920 0.005 0.060 1921 0.006 0.044 1922 0.006 0.061 1923 0.005 0.064 1924 0.003 0.081 1925 0.003 0.044 1926 0.005 0.085 1927 0.006 0.061 1928 0.004 0.056 1929 0.010 0.094 1930 0.006 0.105 1931 0.005 0.048 1932 0.004 0.057 1933 0.005 0.053 1934 0.013 0.085 1935 0.005 0.050 1936 0.008 0.055 1937 0.006 0.078 1938 0.006 0.051 1939 0.000 0.070 1940 0.005 0.096 1941 0.005 0.080 1942 0.007 0.076 1943 0.003 0.085 1944 0.006 0.126 1945 0.006 0.084 1946 0.005 0.059 1947 0.004 0.054 1948 0.011 0.069 1949 0.009 0.109 1950 0.005 0.046 1951 0.007 0.071 1952 0.018 0.123 1953 0.014 0.118 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 66 5.1.a 1954 0.004 0.061 1955 0.004 0.052 1956 0.003 0.041 1957 0.007 0.060 1958 0.016 0.076 1959 0.010 0.072 1960 0.004 0.058 1961 0.009 0.169 1962 0.005 0.065 1963 0.003 0.045 1964 0.004 0.123 1965 0.011 0.073 1966 0.002 0.054 1967 0.005 0.062 1968 0.006 0.055 1969 0.004 0.062 1970 0.007 0.073 1971 0.012 0.076 1972 0.008 0.224 1973 0.009 0.119 1974 0.006 0.092 1975 0.013 0.108 1976 0.006 0.091 1977 0.004 0.041 1978 0.011 0.078 1979 0.003 0.070 1980 0.006 0.069 1981 0.006 0.078 1982 0.004 0.056 1983 0.009 0.080 1984 0.003 0.075 1985 0.005 0.073 1986 0.004 0.048 1987 0.009 0.076 1988 0.007 0.051 1989 0.005 0.048 1990 0.007 0.052 1991 0.005 0.085 1992 0.008 0.086 1993 0.007 0.097 1994 0.011 0.065 1995 0.003 0.045 1996 0.013 0.067 1997 0.006 0.055 1998 0.006 0.071 1999 0.000 0.076 2000 0.004 0.078 2001 0.003 0.069 2002 0.009 0.103 2003 0.006 0.053 2004 0.007 0.090 2005 0.009 0.131 2006 0.004 0.057 2007 0.005 0.080 2008 0.006 0.063 2009 0.004 0.060 2010 0.003 0.075 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 67 5.1.a 2011 0.004 0.051 2012 0.005 0.076 2013 0.005 0.056 2014 0.003 0.059 2015 0.010 0.109 2016 0.002 0.049 2017 0.009 0.111 2018 0.017 0.076 2019 0.017 0.100 2020 0.006 0.083 2021 0.008 0.077 2022 0.003 0.099 2023 0.006 0.106 2024 0.021 0.151 2025 0.005 0.057 2026 0.009 0.065 2027 0.004 0.078 2028 0.002 0.036 2029 0.007 0.058 2030 0.012 0.089 2031 0.004 0.041 2032 0.003 0.048 2033 0.003 0.051 2034 0.004 0.055 2035 0.013 0.073 2036 0.007 0.053 2037 0.002 0.072 2038 0.008 0.072 2039 0.001 0.113 2040 0.003 0.059 2041 0.004 0.068 2042 0.014 0.082 2043 0.007 0.090 2044 0.009 0.062 2045 0.006 0.058 2046 0.007 0.056 2047 0.005 0.075 2048 0.005 0.063 2049 0.005 0.094 2050 0.004 0.058 2051 0.006 0.098 2052 0.004 0.059 2053 0.006 0.062 2054 0.008 0.100 2055 0.003 0.061 2056 0.003 0.079 2057 0.004 0.048 2058 0.005 0.085 Stream Protection Duration Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.0209 0.2235 2 0.0194 0.1777 3 0.0178 0.1690 4 0.0172 0.1506 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 68 5.1.a 5 0.0170 0.1309 6 0.0158 0.1264 7 0.0144 0.1259 8 0.0137 0.1229 9 0.0133 0.1228 10 0.0132 0.1191 11 0.0130 0.1179 12 0.0129 0.1134 13 0.0124 0.1107 14 0.0119 0.1094 15 0.0113 0.1089 16 0.0113 0.1079 17 0.0112 0.1059 18 0.0112 0.1052 19 0.0099 0.1035 20 0.0098 0.1000 21 0.0096 0.0999 22 0.0096 0.0989 23 0.0094 0.0981 24 0.0093 0.0975 25 0.0091 0.0974 26 0.0091 0.0957 27 0.0090 0.0942 28 0.0090 0.0940 29 0.0089 0.0920 30 0.0089 0.0914 31 0.0088 0.0899 32 0.0088 0.0898 33 0.0087 0.0890 34 0.0086 0.0859 35 0.0084 0.0854 36 0.0084 0.0853 37 0.0078 0.0849 38 0.0077 0.0848 39 0.0077 0.0847 40 0.0077 0.0843 41 0.0076 0.0840 42 0.0075 0.0832 43 0.0074 0.0820 44 0.0069 0.0806 45 0.0068 0.0804 46 0.0067 0.0801 47 0.0067 0.0800 48 0.0067 0.0789 49 0.0067 0.0783 50 0.0066 0.0780 51 0.0066 0.0779 52 0.0066 0.0777 53 0.0065 0.0776 54 0.0065 0.0772 55 0.0065 0.0772 56 0.0064 0.0764 57 0.0064 0.0764 58 0.0064 0.0763 59 0.0063 0.0762 60 0.0062 0.0759 61 0.0062 0.0757 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 69 5.1.a 62 0.0062 0.0756 63 0.0061 0.0752 64 0.0060 0.0749 65 0.0060 0.0748 66 0.0060 0.0747 67 0.0060 0.0734 68 0.0059 0.0733 69 0.0059 0.0733 70 0.0059 0.0731 71 0.0059 0.0731 72 0.0059 0.0731 73 0.0058 0.0725 74 0.0058 0.0723 75 0.0058 0.0720 76 0.0058 0.0716 77 0.0057 0.0712 78 0.0057 0.0709 79 0.0057 0.0703 80 0.0055 0.0701 81 0.0055 0.0698 82 0.0055 0.0692 83 0.0054 0.0692 84 0.0054 0.0687 85 0.0054 0.0679 86 0.0053 0.0671 87 0.0053 0.0671 88 0.0052 0.0655 89 0.0052 0.0652 90 0.0052 0.0649 91 0.0051 0.0640 92 0.0051 0.0629 93 0.0051 0.0626 94 0.0051 0.0621 95 0.0051 0.0620 96 0.0050 0.0618 97 0.0050 0.0618 98 0.0049 0.0612 99 0.0048 0.0610 100 0.0047 0.0609 101 0.0046 0.0606 102 0.0046 0.0605 103 0.0045 0.0601 104 0.0045 0.0596 105 0.0045 0.0596 106 0.0044 0.0594 107 0.0044 0.0594 108 0.0044 0.0592 109 0.0043 0.0588 110 0.0043 0.0583 111 0.0043 0.0583 112 0.0042 0.0582 113 0.0041 0.0581 114 0.0041 0.0574 115 0.0040 0.0568 116 0.0040 0.0568 117 0.0039 0.0565 118 0.0039 0.0564 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 70 5.1.a 119 0.0038 0.0564 120 0.0038 0.0559 121 0.0037 0.0554 122 0.0037 0.0550 123 0.0037 0.0549 124 0.0036 0.0548 125 0.0036 0.0545 126 0.0035 0.0538 127 0.0035 0.0534 128 0.0035 0.0533 129 0.0034 0.0532 130 0.0032 0.0524 131 0.0031 0.0522 132 0.0031 0.0512 133 0.0031 0.0511 134 0.0030 0.0511 135 0.0030 0.0506 136 0.0030 0.0503 137 0.0030 0.0500 138 0.0030 0.0485 139 0.0029 0.0483 140 0.0028 0.0483 141 0.0028 0.0481 142 0.0027 0.0480 143 0.0027 0.0480 144 0.0026 0.0468 145 0.0026 0.0460 146 0.0026 0.0457 147 0.0026 0.0452 148 0.0025 0.0449 149 0.0024 0.0447 150 0.0023 0.0443 151 0.0021 0.0442 152 0.0019 0.0442 153 0.0015 0.0415 154 0.0013 0.0408 155 0.0008 0.0408 156 0.0005 0.0401 157 0.0003 0.0358 Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC #1 On-line facility volume: 0.0251 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0.0335 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.0373 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0.0188 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.0209 cfs. LID Report LID Technique Used for Total Volume Volume Infiltration Cumulative Percent Water Quality Percent Comment Treatment? Needs Through Volume Volume Volume Water Quality Treatment Facility (ac-ft.) Infiltration Infiltrated Treated (ac-ft) (ac-ft) Credit Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 71 5.1.a Total Volume Infiltrated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% No Treat. Credit Compliance with LID Standard 8 Duration Analysis Result = Failed Perind and Impind Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying documentation are provided 'as -is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by End User. Clear Creek Solutions Inc. and the governmental licensee or sublicensees disclaim all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions Inc. be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions Inc. or their authorized representatives have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Software Copyright © by : Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. 2005-2021; All Rights Reserved. Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 72 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section IV, Page 1 Section IV — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Section IV Summary: Narrative Erosion control details are provided consistent with the City of Edmonds guidelines. Erosion control plan sheets are provided in full-size as a part of the civil drawing set. For sites under one acre in area, the Department of Ecology (DOE) does not require completion of the full Construction SWPPP or the Construction Stormwater General Permit. Therefore, a Construction SWPPP is not required for this site. The following is an abbreviated format of the SWPPP that addresses each of the 13 elements of construction pollution prevention for the City review. Please note that the project may apply for a DOE permit regardless due to the contaminated soil considerations. Element 1: Mark clearing limits To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits of construction will be clearly marked before land -disturbing activities begin. Clearing limits will be to the extents of necessary land disturbance for the new building and this can be seen on drawing sheet C2.1. The BMPs relevant to marking the clearing limits that will be applied for this project include: High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) Element 2: Establish construction access Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. A stabilized construction entrance should be utilized as needed when possible to prevent sediment tracking. See C2.1 for placement. The BMPs relevant to establishing construction access that will be applied for this project include: Stabilized Construction Entrance (BMP C105) Element 3: Control Flow Rates The site slopes on average about 1% from north to south. The site is small enough that a silt fence used for Element 4 may be used to control flow rates. Element 4: Install sediment controls All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal BMP a before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged. Silt fences will be installed on the downstream ends. Pollution prevention facilities on the erosion control plan must be constructed prior to 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 1 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 73 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section IV, Page 2 or in conjunction with all clearing and grading to ensure that the transport of sediment to surface waters and adjacent properties is minimized. The specific BMPs to be used for controlling sediment on this project include: Silt Fence (BMP C233) Element 5: Stabilize Soils Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be used on this project include: Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) Mulching (BMP C121) Nets and Blankets (BMP C122) Plastic Covering (BMP C123) Sodding (BMP C124) Topsoil ing/Composting (BMP C125) Surface Roughening (BMP C130) Dust Control (BMP C140) Element 6: Protect Slopes There are existing surfaces that will be removed as part of the development. Exposed slopes shall be stabilized with BMPs found in Element 5. Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets Catch basins along Main St and 2"d Ave S and as made operable on -site will be protected from sedimentation. Stormwater shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or treated to remove sediment. Inlet protection devices shall be cleaned or removed and replaced when sediment has filled one-third of the available storage (or as specified by the manufacturer). The specific BMPs to be used for protecting drain inlets are: Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets Conveyance channels are not located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Element 9: Control Pollutants Design, install, implement and maintain effective pollution prevention measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants. The suggested BMPs are: a CM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 Attachment 4 1 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 74 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section IV, Page 3 Concrete Handling (BMP C151) Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution Prevention (BMP C152) Material Delivery, Storage and Containment (BMP C153) For this site, controlling the pollutants will also require strict compliance with the EMMP for the project Section 10 of the EMMP lists requirements and recommendations for several different construction activities. Element 10: Control Dewatering De -watering is not anticipated, but if needed, should follow the EMMP. Element 11: Maintain BMPs All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to ensure continued performance of their intended function. Element 12: Manage the Project • Phase development projects to the maximum degree practicable and consider seasonal work limits. • Follow the recommendations and requirements of the EMMP. • Inspection and monitoring— Inspect, maintain, and repair all BMPs as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Conduct site inspections and monitoring in accordance with the Construction Stormwater General Permit or local plan approval authority. • Maintain an Updated Construction SWPPP - This SWPPP shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site. The SWPPP shall be modified whenever there is a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has, or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. The SWPPP shall be modified if, during inspections or investigations conducted by the owner/operator, or the applicable local or state regulatory authority, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site. The SWPPP shall be modified as necessary to include additional or modified BMPs designed to correct problems identified. Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within seven (7) days following the inspection. Element 13: Protect Low Impact Development BMPs Low -Impact Development BMPs are not proposed for this project. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 75 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section IV, Page 4 Source Controls This project should incorporate required BMPs from Volume IV of the DOE Manual: S407 — BMPs for Dust Control at Disturbed Land Areas and Unpaved Roadways and Parking Lots; S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management; S417 — BMPs for Maintenance of Stormwater Drainage and Treatment Systems; and S424 — BMPs for Roof/Building Drains at Manufacturing and Commercial Buildings. The Operation & Maintenance Manual found in Section VII contains guide sheets for the aforementioned BMPs. C � ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 76 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section V, Page 1 Section V — Special Reports and/or Studies Section V Summ Narrative The following reports are included in this section: 1. Critical Areas Report by Landau Associates dated June 17, 2017. C 4M ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 77 5.1.a Draft Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development Edmonds, Washington June 22, 2017 Prepared for Port of Edmonds Edmonds, Washington LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425)778-0907 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 78 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Description.............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Scope of Services................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 General Geologic Conditions..............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Surface Conditions..............................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions.................................................................................................2-1 2.4 Groundwater Conditions....................................................................................................2-1 3.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Site Classification and Seismic Design Parameters............................................................3-1 3.2 Liquefaction Potential........................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Liquefaction -Induced Settlement.......................................................................................3-2 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................4-1 5.0 DESIGN -LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS.........................................................................................................................5-1 6.0 USE OF THIS REPORT......................................................................................................................6-1 7.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................7-1 Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 i Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 79 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates FIGURES Figure Title Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Critical Areas Map, Seismic Hazard Areas Appendix Title A Field Explorations B Laboratory Soil Testing Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development APPENDICES 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 80 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates This page intentionally left blank. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 iii Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 81 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a critical areas assessment related to geologically hazardous areas that Landau Associates' (LAI) conducted for the Port of Edmonds (Port) proposed Marine Retail Development project in Edmonds, Washington. The general project location is shown on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1). A base map of a portion of the project site and the location of our subsurface exploration are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the seismic hazard area in the vicinity of the project site. This report has been prepared based on LAI's discussions with Jackson Main Architecture (Jackson Main) and the Port; a conceptual site plan provided by Jackson Main; data collected during our field exploration and laboratory testing programs; our familiarity with geologic conditions within the vicinity of the project site; and our experience on similar projects. 1.1 Project Description We understand that the Port would like to develop the vacant lots located at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 on Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington for retail purposes. As detailed in the City of Edmonds Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report No. CRA19940162, the project site has been determined to contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a seismic hazard area, wetland, and stream. The City is requiring critical areas reports to satisfy the requirements outlined in the City of Edmonds Community Development Code, which references minimum report requirements and additional requirements specific to the type of critical area affected. This report addresses geologically hazardous areas; the other critical areas (i.e., wetland and stream) are addressed by LAI in a separate document. 1.2 Scope of Services Jackson Main retained LAI to provide critical areas services to support design of the proposed retail development. Our services were provided in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our proposal dated May 23, 2017. Written authorization to proceed was provided by Shawn Rafferty of Jackson Main on May 24, 2017. This report addresses Task 1, as described in our proposal and is intended to satisfy the geotechnical requirements of Section 23.40.090.D and related sections of the City of Edmonds Community Development Code. Our scope of services for Task 1 includes the following specific tasks: • Reviewing readily available published geologic maps, geotechnical reports, and drawings for the project area • Preparing a geotechnical work plan • Completing a geologic reconnaissance to collect information on the general nature and physical features of the project area • Obtaining utility clearances prior to performing a field exploration program Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 1-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 82 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates • Advancing one exploratory boring to characterize the nature of the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the project site • Collecting representative soil samples from the exploratory boring at selected depth intervals • Logging the exploratory boring and recording pertinent information, including soil sample depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics, and groundwater occurrence • Conducting Atterberg Limits determinations and grain size distribution analyses on samples obtained from the exploratory boring • Performing geotechnical engineering analyses and evaluating data derived from the subsurface investigation and laboratory testing programs • Preparing and submitting this written critical areas report summarizing the results of our findings, conclusions, and preliminary recommendations for the project. This report includes: — a site plan showing the location of the boring completed for this project — a site plan showing the seismic hazard critical areas — results of laboratory testing and a log of the exploratory boring — a discussion of the near -surface soil and groundwater conditions observed at the project site — a discussion of geologically hazardous areas on the site and geologically hazardous areas off site potentially impacted by the proposed project — an evaluation of the physical properties of the subsurface soils, including the thickness of unconsolidated deposits and an approximate factor of safety against liquefaction — a discussion of the potential impacts of seismic activity on the site — preliminary recommendations for mitigating the liquefaction hazard at the project site. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 1-2 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 83 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS This section discusses the general geologic setting of the project area and describes the surface and subsurface conditions observed at the project site at the time of our field investigation. Interpretations of the site conditions are based on the results of our review of available information, and the results of our site reconnaissance, subsurface investigation, and laboratory testing. 2.1 General Geologic Conditions General geologic information for the project area was obtained from the Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington (Minard 1983), published by the US Geological Survey. According to this source, the project area is underlain by modified land. Soil defined as modified land is typically highly variable and often consists of unconsolidated sands, silty sands, and gravels that can contain debris. 2.2 Surface Conditions The project site, which is located at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 on Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington, is bordered by Admiral Way, West Dayton Street, and BNSF Railroad. The project site is generally level with little to no vegetation. The site also houses stockpiles of bark mulch and other soils. Structures in the vicinity of the project site include marina facilities, restaurants, and commercial retail spaces, and development within the project area consists of a mixture of commercial and light industrial uses. 2.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions Subsurface conditions at the project site were explored by advancing and sampling one exploratory boring (B-1) on June 8, 2017. The exploratory boring was advanced to a depth of about 26.5 ft below the ground surface (bgs) in an area of potential future development. The approximate location of the boring is shown on Figure 2. A discussion of field exploration procedures, together with an edited log of the exploratory boring, is presented in Appendix A. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. At the location explored, subsurface conditions at the project site were observed to consist of about 7 ft of medium dense to dense sand that is underlain by approximately 5 ft of very soft to soft silt with organics, which is underlain by dense to very dense sand with gravel. Boring B-1 did not extend beyond the bottom of the dense to very dense sand with gravel. 2.4 Groundwater Conditions At the time of our field investigation in early June 2017, groundwater was observed at a depth of about 9 ft bgs in boring B-1. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 2-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 84 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates It should be noted that the groundwater conditions reported herein are for the specific location and date indicated, and therefore, may not necessarily be indicative of other locations and/or times. Furthermore, it is anticipated that groundwater conditions at the project site will vary depending on local subsurface conditions, the weather, tidal influences, and other factors. It is likely that the highest groundwater levels will occur in the winter/spring months. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 2-2 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 85 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 3.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The Pacific Northwest is seismically active and the project site could be subject to ground shaking from a moderate to major earthquake. Consequently, moderate levels of earthquake shaking should be anticipated during the design life of the project, and the proposed improvements should be designed to resist earthquake loading using appropriate design methodology. 3.1 Site Classification and Seismic Design Parameters Seismic site class is used to estimate ground motion at a site during a design earthquake and dictates the level of design effort with respect to seismic design. Given the presence of liquefiable soil at the project site (see Section 3.2), the project site could be interpreted as site class F. However, assuming the future structure's fundamental period of vibration is less than 0.5 seconds, the 2015 IBC and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7) allow for estimation of site class using conventional methods [i.e., shear wave velocity or Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value profiles]. For this site, the SPT N-value profile results in a site class C. The seismic design parameters presented in Table 1 were obtained from the US Geological Survey's (USGS) seismic design maps for the IBC/ASCE 7 2,475-year (2 percent in 50-year exceedance probability) design earthquake and site class C. The design earthquake moment magnitude (M) was determined by selecting the earthquake magnitude with the largest hazard contribution as shown in the seismic hazard deaggregation performed by USGS. Table 1. Seismic Design Parameters Site Class M PGA (g) SS (g) Sl (g) Fa F FPGA TL (s) C 7.11 0.513 1.267 0.497 1.000 1.303 1.000 6 a Fa, Fv = acceleration (0.2-second period) and velocity (1.0-second period) site coefficients, respectively. b FPGA = peak ground acceleration coefficient. c M = design earthquake moment magnitude. d PGA = peak ground acceleration. e S5, S1= 0.2-second and 1.0-second period spectral accelerations, respectively. f TL = long period transition. 3.2 Liquefaction Potential As detailed in the City of Edmonds Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report No. CRA19940162, the project site has been determined to contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a Seismic Hazard Area. Based on our observations and the information provided in the above referenced Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report, the Seismic Hazard for the project site has been determined to be soil liquefaction. Liquefaction is defined as a significant rise in pore water pressure within a soil mass caused by earthquake -induced cyclic shaking. The shear strength of liquefiable soil is reduced during large and/or long -duration earthquakes as the soil consistency approaches that of a semi -solid slurry, which Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 3-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 86 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates can result in significant and widespread structural damage if not properly mitigated. Deposits of loose, granular soil below the water table are most susceptible to liquefaction, although non -plastic and low -plasticity cohesive soils may also be susceptible to liquefaction. The first step in liquefaction analysis is to identify the susceptibility of the soils to liquefaction; for example, some soils may be too plastic to undergo liquefaction, or groundwater may not be present. The liquefaction susceptibility at this site was evaluated by identifying liquefaction -prone soils (soft to medium stiff, low plasticity silts and loose to medium dense sands and silty sands) and the presence of groundwater. For liquefaction analysis, groundwater was assumed to be 6 ft bgs. The liquefaction susceptibility of the silt unit at the project site was evaluated using the criterion presented by Bray and Sancio (2006).1 The results of our liquefaction susceptibility analysis suggest that the majority of the silt unit at the project site is susceptible to liquefaction. For soil units identified as susceptible to liquefaction, preliminary liquefaction analyses were conducted according to the Simplified Procedure (Idriss and Boulanger 2008) to identify the factor of safety against liquefaction. The Simplified Procedure uses an empirical correlation between the SPT blow count corrected for overburden pressure and fines content (the clean sand condition), (N1)60-cs, and the soil resistance to liquefaction. Our preliminary analyses indicate that the soil encountered within Boring B-1 between the depths of 5 and 12.5 ft BGS is liquefiable with an approximate average Factor of Safety (FS) against liquefaction of 0.5. Liquefaction at the project site could result in post -liquefaction settlement, as discussed below. 3.3 Liquefaction -Induced Settlement Liquefaction likely will result in ground surface settlement. The amount of liquefaction -induced ground settlement during and following the design seismic event was estimated using empirical methods developed by Tokimatsu and Seed (1987), Ishihara and Yoshimine (1992), and Idriss and Boulanger (2008). These estimates address only settlement caused by liquefaction -induced soil reconsolidation, and estimates reflect free -field settlement. Soil —structure interaction between foundations and liquefiable soils could cause additional seismically induced settlement. In our opinion, a sufficient thickness of soil is present above the water table so as to preclude the potential for shallow foundation failure due to liquefaction. However, this situation could lead to localized zones of liquefaction during the design earthquake, which could result in differential ground settlement. Our analyses indicate an estimated magnitude of differential ground settlement of approximately 3 inches if no ground improvement efforts are made. The actual magnitude and extent i Bray and Sancio (2006) state that cohesive soils are susceptible to liquefaction if the water content to liquid limit ratio is 0.85 or more and the soil has a plasticity index (PI) <12. Additionally, clayey silts and silty clays of moderate plasticity (12<PI<18) can undergo liquefaction when shaken intensely for a significant number of loading cycles. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 3-2 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 87 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates of the settlement will depend on many factors, including the duration and intensity of ground shaking during the seismic event and local soil and groundwater conditions. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 3-2 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 88 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon evaluation of the data collected during this assessment, it is our opinion that the liquefaction hazard at the project site will need to be mitigated in order to reduce the preexisting level of risk to the site and all other properties potentially impacted on a long-term basis. Furthermore, based on our observations and preliminary analyses, it is our opinion that the project could be designed so that the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than predevelopment conditions. Possible options for mitigating the liquefaction hazard at the project site include: • Shallow Foundations: Structures at the site may be constructed on shallow foundations and no ground improvement, assuming the structure is designed to accommodate the estimated seismically induced settlement, in addition to any anticipated static settlements due to construction and building loads. From a geotechnical perspective, this is likely the most economical mitigation approach. • Excavate and Replace/Shallow Foundations: Structures at the site could be constructed on shallow foundations with overexcavation and replacement of the unconsolidated deposits. Removing and replacing the unconsolidated deposits with compacted structural fill to the full depth of 12 ft bgs would eliminate the risk of seismically induced settlement, however would require challenging deep excavations. Due to the presence of unconsolidated sands and a relatively shallow groundwater table, these deep excavations would likely require the use of elaborate shoring and dewatering systems. This option is likely to be less economical due to the need for extensive shoring and dewatering in order to fully remove the unconsolidated deposits. Ground Improvement: Structures at the site could be constructed on improved ground. Soil could be improved by either mixing material with soil in situ (such as with deep soil mixing) or by placing material in bored holes (such as with rammed -aggregate piers) to create relatively strong and stiff vertical elements. These options are likely to be moderate cost, however will significantly reduce seismically induced settlements, as well as reduce settlements due to building loads. Deep Foundations: Structures at the site could be constructed on deep foundations consisting of driven or drilled elements. These elements could be unreinforced or reinforced grout columns or auger -cast piles, or driven piles. This is likely the least economical mitigation approach. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 4-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 89 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 5.0 DESIGN -LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS We recommend that LAI be retained to develop design -level recommendations in support of the retail development, as well as review the geotechnical-related portions of the project plans and specifications to determine if they are consistent with the recommendations presented in this and subsequent reports. We also recommend that monitoring, testing, and consultation be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by our explorations, to provide recommendations should conditions be revealed during construction that differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether geotechnicaI-related construction activities comply with project plans/specifications and the recommendations contained in this and subsequent reports. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 5-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 90 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 6.0 USE OF THIS REPORT LAI prepared this report for the exclusive use of Jackson Main Architects and the Port of Edmonds for specific application to proposed Marine Retail Development project in Edmonds, Washington. This report is not intended to be sufficient for final design; however, the information in this report could be supplemented with additional explorations and engineering analyses which could form the basis of the design -phase geotechnical recommendations. Use of this report by others or for another project is at the user's sole risk. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been conducted in accordance with generally accepted practices of the geotechnical engineering profession; no other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. The preliminary conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the subsurface data obtained from the exploration completed for this study. Additional explorations should be completed at the time of final design. There may be some variation in subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the project site, and the nature and extent of the variations may not become evident until construction. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services on this project and look forward to assisting you during the design phase of the project. If you have any questions or comments regarding the information contained in this report, or if we may be of further service, please call. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 6-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 91 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 7.0 REFERENCES Minard, J.P. 1983. Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington U.S. Geological Survey. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 7-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 92 Puget Sound ■ Project Location f { 0 0.5 1 Miles Data Source: Esri 2012 A k m V a E 0 � Puget Dr 524 Caspers St ? Z � a 'r M f � I - Main St C Edmonds Marine Retail LANDAU Development Vicinity Map ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Attachment 4 �a 220th St SW a a Seattle Spokane Tacoma Hympia Washington Figure 1 Packet Pg. 93 Landau Associates I G:\I CH �15ti� RIM=12.32 6" DI NW IE=9.32 \F02 Site Plan.dwg 1 6/19/2017 3:12 PM RIM=11.34 6"PVC ENE IE.94 P T�A�ISTRANS GAS II II \ 3 ---12— So � o RIM=1 1.E _ s5 r SS SS SS SS SS Ss S— _ ss ss ss ss---�--�u+ - — --4e4►irs— — — — _ 12 CONC_ W W N W W —W'— W. W W 4l 2, 8' SWINGING GAT S 4,� 16"sin :.:.: :.: •: b': 20' )�O NG GATE I 5' HAINLINK FENCE W/ BARBWIRE ss RECYCLE OUTDOOR DISPL PININ"010 d I �% % %������� /////////,%/%i%///�%///%////.'//////.///�� MOM,�/i <� SITE i 20,680 SF \ 0.48 ACRES 14 C C 6 S 5 S S S 5 • 8.k185' 8.k 8.k16.5' 8. .5' x18.5' a.ktfi.6 8.'x16.5' 8.'x185' 85x16.5' 05'xi65' BSki6.5' . k .' 85xi6.5 8.5ki6.' B.Ski6 8.5k1 5' 8.5'x1 R 6' CHAINLINK Legend B-1 S Boring location and designation 0 40 80 LANDAU Scale in Feet ASSOCIATES ABOVE GROUND POWERLINEBOVE GROUND POWERLINE Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Base Map Source: Jackson Main Architecture, 2017 T Edmonds Marine Retail Development Site and Exploration Plan Edmonds, Washington Attach—m-e—ff Figure 2 Packet Pg. 94 4 k-f 1 • � Admiral Ways -6NSF oo v ia oP\N18R\:' 40 38 30 3? 7 Legend Q Overall Parcel Subject Parcel of this Report (See Figure 2) Seismic Hazard Areas Contours 0 LANDAU ASSOCIATES r; Data Sources: City of Edmonds GIS 0 150 300 Edmonds Marine Retail Development Scale in Feet Edmonds, Washington o�- i� tiIlk- Note 1. Black and white reproduction of this color original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. Critical Areas Map Figure Seismic Hazard Areas 3 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 95 5.1.a APPENDIX P Field Explorations a� C M 3 m C O N .S a N C O E W 4- 0 r- O d N O O N O N Z J d N C d E t V R r r Q t r 3 O Q. 4 4- m r U) N T- O O N O N Z J d C N t V O r r Q Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 96 5.1.a DRAFT APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on June 8, 2017. The exploration program consisted of advancing one exploratory boring at the approximate location illustrated on Figure 2 of this report. The boring was advanced to a depth of approximately 26.5 ft below the existing ground surface (BGS) using the hollow -stem auger drilling technique. Holocene Drilling, Inc. of Puyallup, Washington advanced the boring under subcontract to Landau Associates. The location of the exploratory boring was located approximately in the field by measuring distances to nearby features. The ground surface elevation at the exploration location was not determined. The field exploration program was coordinated and monitored by Landau Associates personnel who also obtained representative soil samples, maintained a detailed record of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, and described the soil encountered by visual and textural examination. Each representative soil type observed in our exploratory boring was described using the soil classification system shown on Figure A-1, in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D 2488, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure). A log of the exploratory boring is presented on Figure A-2. This log represents our interpretation of subsurface conditions identified during the field exploration program. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the summary log represents the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are only for the specific date and location reported and, therefore, are not necessarily representative of other locations and times. A further discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions observed is contained in the text portion of this report. Disturbed samples of the soil encountered in the exploratory boring were obtained at selected intervals using a 1.5-inch inside -diameter split -spoon sampler. The sampler was driven up to 18 inches into the undisturbed soil ahead of the drill bit with a 140-lb hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the final 12 inches of soil penetration, or part thereof, is noted on the boring log, adjacent to the appropriate sample notation. Samples collected in the manner were taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the borehole was decommissioned in general accordance with the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-160. A-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 97 5.1.a MAJOR DIVISIONS Soil Classification System uscs GRAPHIC LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL"' TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS (2)(3) GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVEL oo o:o..a.. GW Well -graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines N m .N GRAVELLY SOIL (Little or no fines) Poorly graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines o . o o 0 o GP GRAVEL WITH FINES GM o 16 m (More than 50% of Silty gravel; gravel/sand/silt mixture(s) Z E'y coarse fraction retained (Appreciable amount of ° Q o N on No. 4 sieve) fines) GC Clayey gravel; gravel/sand/clay mixture(s) CD Z SAND AND CLEAN SAND SW Well -graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines w c cn t r SANDY SOIL (Little or no fines) Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines SP ry SAND WITH FINES SPA Q 2!m O 02, (More than 50% of fraction Silty sand; sand/silt mixture(s) coarse passed (Appreciable amount of SC through No. 4 sieve) ) fines) Clayey sand; sand/clay mixture(s) PALsand Inor anic silt and very fine sand; rock flour; silty or clayey fine p o t �, SILT AND CLAY or clayey silt with slight plasticity CL N Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity; gravelly clay; sandy ID CD@ a) (Liquid limit less than 50) clay; silty clay; lean clay GL w ' E a', Z N y Organic silt; organic, silty clay of low plasticity N Q,L.Tp MH Inorganic silt; micaceous or diatomaceous fine sand m N o '_ SILT AND CLAY OF ` CO Z CH Inorganic clay of high plasticity; fat clay Z E LL (Liquid limit greater than 50) OH Organic clay of medium to high plasticity; organic silt HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL PT Peat; humus; swamp soil with high organic content GRAPHIC LETTER OTHER MATERIALS SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS PAVEMENT AC Or PC Asphalt concrete pavement or Portland cement pavement ROCK RK Rock (See Rock Classification) WOOD 7c, WD Wood, lumber, wood chips DEBRIS O DB Construction debris, garbage Notes: 1. USCS letter symbols correspond to symbols used by the Unified Soil Classification System and ASTM classification methods. Dual letter symbols (e.g., SP-SM for sand or gravel) indicate soil with an estimated 5-15% fines. Multiple letter symbols (e.g., ML/CL) indicate borderline or multiple soil classifications. 2. Soil descriptions are based on the general approach presented in the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure), outlined in ASTM D 2488. Where laboratory index testing has been conducted, soil classifications are based on the Standard Test Method for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, as outlined in ASTM D 2487. 3. Soil description terminology is based on visual estimates (in the absence of laboratory test data) of the percentages of each soil type and is defined as follows: Primary Constituent: > 50% - "GRAVEL," "SAND," "SILT," "CLAY," etc. Secondary Constituents: > 30% and < 50% - "very gravelly," "very sandy," "very silty," etc. > 15% and < 30% - "gravelly," "sandy," "silty," etc. Additional Constituents: > 5% and <_ 15% - "with gravel," "with sand," "with silt," etc. < 5% - "with trace gravel," "with trace sand," "with trace silt," etc., or not noted. 4. Soil density or consistency descriptions are based on judgement using a combination of sampler penetration blow counts, drilling or excavating conditions, field tests, and laboratory tests, as appropriate. Drilling and Sampling Key Field and Lab Test Data SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE NUMBER & INTERVAL Code Description Code Description a 3.25-inch O.D., 2.42-inch I.D. Split Spoon PP = 1.0 Pocket Penetrometer, tsf b 2.00-inch O.D., 1.50-inch I.D. Split Spoon Sample Identification Number TV = 0.5 Torvane, tsf c Shelby Tube PID = 100 Photoionization Detector VOC screening, ppm d Grab Sample Recovery Depth Interval W = 10 Moisture Content, % e Single -Tube Core Barrel 1 F Sample Depth Interval D = 120 Dry Density, pcf f Double -Tube Core Barrel -200 = 60 Material smaller than No. 200 sieve, % g 2.50-inch O.D., 2.00-inch I.D. WSDOT Portion of Sample Retained GS Grain Size - See separate figure for data h 3.00-inch O.D., 2.375-inch I.D. Mod. California for Archive or Analysis AL Atterberg Limits - See separate figure for data i Other - See text if applicable GT Other Geotechnical Testing 1 300-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop CA Chemical Analysis 2 140-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop Groundwater 3 Pushed 4 Vibrocore (Rotosonic/Geoprobe) :Z Approximate water level at time of drilling (ATD) 5 Other - See text if applicable 1 Approximate water level at time other than ATD Edmonds Marine Retail Figure 14 LANDAU Development Soil Classification System and Key /� �I ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington A_ I Attachment 4F Packet Pg. 98 5 10 15 20 25 30 B-1 SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE 75 Drilling Method: Hollow -Stem Auger 0 Zo ca t> E Ground Elevation (ft): Not Determined 3 o 2Z LL m U v .6 aa2 n � 0 a U w cn xs cn 100 c U) Logged By: SMG Date: 06/08/17 AC Asphalt Pavement (3 inch thickness) SP- (ASPHALT) SM Gray, gravelly SAND with silt (medium W = 9 dense, moist to wet) 1 b2 28 -200 = 6 (FILL) W=15 2b2 18 GS ML Gray -brown SILT with organics Q 3 b2 2 sand lense at 11.4 ft (very soft to soft, El moist to wet) (ALLUVIUM) 4 b2 3 W = 55 AL W = 16 SP Gray, fine to coarse SAND with gravel, 5 b2 34 -200 = 5 trace silt (dense to very dense, wet) (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 6b2 54 71 b2 83/ 9.. 811 b2 56 Boring Completed 06/08/17 Total Depth of Boring = 26.5 ft. 35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key" figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. I Edmonds Marine Retail 14 LANDAU Development Log of Boring B-1 ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Attachment 4 LAI Project No: 1527002.010 Moisture Content (%) Plastic Liquid Limit I�� Limit 20 40 60 80 A SPT N-Value A L Non -Standard N-Value � 20 40 60 80 X Fines Content (%) X 20 40 60 80 1 *A • A 81 9" ' R Figure A-2 Packet Pg. 99 5.1.a APPENDIX E Laboratory Soil Testing a� C M 3 m C O N .S a N C O E W 4- 0 r- O d N O O N O N Z J d N C d E t V R r r Q t r 3 O Q. 4 4- m r U) N T- O O N O N Z J d C N t V O r r Q Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 100 5.1.a DRAFT APPENDIX B LABORATORY SOIL TESTING Soil samples obtained from our exploratory boring were taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to characterize certain engineering and index properties of the soils at the project site. The laboratory testing program, which was performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) standard test procedures noted below, was limited to visual inspection to confirm our field soil descriptions, and determination of natural moisture content, certain Atterberg limits, and grain size distribution. A brief description of the testing performed is presented below. Natural Moisture Content The natural moisture contents of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory boring were determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 test procedures. The results from the moisture content determinations are indicated adjacent to the corresponding samples on the summary boring log presented in Appendix A. Atterberg Limit Analysis The Atterberg limits test was performed on a soil sample obtained from the exploratory boring in general accordance with ASTM D 4318 test procedures. The purpose of the test was to determine the liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of fine-grained soil sample. The sample selected for Atterberg limits test is designated with an "AL" in the column labeled "Test Data" on the summary boring log. Atterberg limits results are summarized on Figure B-1. Grain Size Analysis A sieve analysis was conducted on a selected soil sample obtained from the exploratory boring in general accordance with ASTM D422 test procedures. The sample selected for grain size analysis is designated with a "GS" in the column labeled "Test Data" on the summary boring log. The test results are presented in the form of a grain size distribution curve on Figure B-2. B-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 101 5.1.a a 60 50 40 20 10 0 ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS IC Exploration Sample Liquid lastic Plasticity Natural Unified Soil Symbol Number Number Depth Limit L' Index Moisture Soil Description Classification (ft) (%� (°o (%) (%) • B-1 S-4 10.0 43 27 16 55 Gray -brown SILT with organics MIL ASTM D 4318 Test Method Edmonds Marine Retail LANDAU Property ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Plasticity Chart Figure B-1 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 102 5.1.a 1527002.01 6/19/17 N:\PROJECTS\1527002.010.GPJ GRAIN SIZE FIGURE STRAIGHT LINE 100 90 80 70 60 50 LL °i 40 a 30 20 10 0 U.S. Sieve Opening in Inches U.S. Sieve Numbers Hydrometer Gravel I Sand Cobbles Silt or Clay Coarse Fine I Coarse Medium Fine Symbol Exploration Number Sample Number Depth (ft) Natural o Moisture (/o) Soil Description Unified Soil Classification • B-1 S-2 5.0 15 Gray, gravelly SAND with silt SP-SM LANDAU ASSOCIATES Edmonds Marine Retail Property Edmonds, Washington [oil Figure Grain Size Distribution B-2 Packet Pg. 103 1 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VI, Page 1 Section VI — Other Permits Section VI Summary: Narrative Other permits are not anticipated to be required for this project besides those from the City of Edmonds. C 4m ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 104 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VI I, Page 1 Section VII — Bond Quantities, Declaration of Covenant, & Operation and Maintenance Manual Section VII Summary: Narrative The Bond Quantity Worksheet is a standalone document that can also be submitted to the City of Edmonds separately from this document. A Declaration of Covenant is provided for the on -site BMPs proposed. The Operation and Maintenance Manual is a standalone document that will be given to the owner following the construction of the project. C � ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 105 5.1.a After recording return to: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Document Title(s) Declaration of Covenant - Private Stormwater Facility Reference Number(s) of Related Documents N/A Grantor(s) (Last, First and Middle Initial) Robert McChesney Grantee(s) (Last, First and Middle Initial) City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated form; i.e., lot, plat or section,. township, range, quarter/quarter) GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number at the Time of Recording: The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. 27032300415800 Attachment 4 1Packet Pg. 106 5.1.a DECLARATION OF COVENANT Private Stormwater Facility WHEREAS, the undersigned Declarant(s) have installed a stormwater facility under Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 known as a "low impact development best management practices (LID BMP)" in lieu of other required more conventional stormwater systems, as selected below: ❑ Permeable Pavement ❑ Rain Garden / Bioretention Cell ❑ Infiltration Trench ❑ Drywell ❑ Gravelless Chamber Other Perforated Stub -out Connection WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has allowed installation of the LID BMP, subject to the execution and recording of this Declaration of Covenant; NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARANT(S), being the owners of the real property ("the Property") located at the following address: 471 Admiral Way in the City of Edmonds, Washington, and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, hereby covenants and agrees, on behalf of himself/herself/themselves/itself and his/her/their/its successors and assigns, as follows: Declarant(s) warrant that he/she/they are the owners of the property described on Exhibit A and have the authority to impose this covenant on the property and bind all future owners, successors, and assigns of the Declarant(s). The Declarant(s), future owners, successors, and assigns of the Declarant(s) shall be referred to collectively as "Owners." 2. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A agree that the property contains a stormwater management facility called a "LID BMP," which was installed to mitigate the stormwater quantity and quality impacts of some or all of the impervious or non-native pervious surfaces on the property. "Low impact development" means development conducted in a way that seeks to minimize or completely prevent alterations to the natural hydrology of the site. Low impact development includes site planning and design to reduce alterations of natural soil and vegetation cover, minimize impervious surfaces, and specific practices that help to replicate natural hydrology such as permeable pavements, green roofs, soil amendments, bioretention systems, and dispersion of runoff. 3. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A shall maintain the size, placement, and design of the LID BMP as depicted on the approved site plan, Exhibit B, and design details shall be maintained and may not be changed without written approval either from the Engineering Division of the City of Edmonds or through a future development permit from the City of Edmonds. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides shall not be used where LID BMP is located. . All costs of maintenance and repair shall be the sole responsibility of the Owners. Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 107 5.1.a 4. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A shall inspect LID BMPs annually for physical defects. After major storm events, the system shall also be checked to ensure that the overflow system is working properly. The Owners also shall maintain all LID BMP so it functions as designed on a year-round basis. 5. The City of Edmonds is hereby granted by the Owners the right, but not the obligation, to enter upon the property described on Exhibit A at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the private stormwater LID BMP facility. If, as the result of any such inspection the City of Edmonds determines that the LID BMP is in disrepair, requires maintenance or repair, or is otherwise not functioning as provided in the BMP site plan, the City Engineer or his designee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to order the Owners of the property described on Exhibit A to maintain or repair the same. 6. If the City of Edmonds determines that the LID BMP requires maintenance or repair pursuant to Section 5, the City of Edmonds shall provide notice to the Owners of the deadline within which such maintenance or repair must be completed. Said notice may further advise that, should the violator fail to perform required maintenance or make repairs within the established deadline, the work may be done by the city or a contractor designated by the City Engineer and the expense thereof shall be charged to the Owners. The City's officers, agents, employees, and contractors shall have the right, which is hereby granted by the Owners, to enter upon the property described on Exhibit A in order to perform such work. The Owners shall bear the cost of all work performed. 7. The Owners shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, officials, employees and agents from any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, judgments, attorneys' fees and/or costs of any kind whatsoever, arising out of or in any way resulting from the approval of the LID BMP, the installation and presence of the LID BMP, and the acts or omissions of the Owners, their officers, employees, contractors, and agents relating to the construction, operation and maintenance of the LID BMPs on the property, except for the City's intentional and willful tortious acts, and waive and release the City of Edmonds from any and all claims for damages and injunctive relief which the Owners may themselves have now or in the future, by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of said LID BMPs. 8. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon the Declarant(s), as the owner of the property described on Exhibit A, and on Declarant's successors and assigns as to such property. Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 108 5.1.a Dated: DECLARANT(S): (Signature) (Print Name) APPROVED: CITY OF EDMONDS (Signature) (Print Name) (Signature) (Title) (Print Name) State of Washington ) ss. County of Snohomish ) On this day personally appeared before me { Declarant(s) } to me known to be the individual, or individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN before me this day of (Signature) 201_ (Name legibly printed or stamped) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Residing at: My commission expires Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 109 5.1.a Exhibit A THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., LYING BETWEEN ADMIRAL WAY AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3 WITH THE CENTERMNE OF ADMIRAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 4203 3'18" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CENTERLINE 54.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47026'42" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID ADMIRAL WAY; THENCE NORTH 42033' 18" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 823.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 42.33'18" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 300.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47026'42" EAST 120.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTH 42033' 18" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 299.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47034'27" WEST 120 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 110 5.1.a 1 Exhibit B Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 111 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VI I, Page 2 C 4M ENGINEERING Port of Edmonds Admin Building 471 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL Date: March 2021 Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 112 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VI I, Page 3 Operation and Maintenance Manual This Operation and Maintenance Manual has been drafted for Port of Edmonds Admin Building, a 6,652 sf building project on a 0.48 acre site. The proposed storm system primarily consists of perforated stub - out connections, catch basins and conveyance pipes. Runoff from the site roof area is routed to perforated stub -out connections through roof drains, and runoff from other impervious areas will flow through catch basins and conveyance pipes. Runoff will outlet to an existing storm main on Admiral Way. Included in this Operation and Maintenance Manual is an 11" x 17" Grading and Drainage Plan sheet showing the location of the system. Please note that this map is generated during the design phase and may not reflect all changes made in permitting and construction. CG Engineering may be contacted for an updated copy of this map once the as -built drawings are completed for the site. The contractor will be responsible for the maintenance and operation of all stormwater structures and BMPs requiring maintenance during construction and, after construction, responsibility will pass to the owner. A map of the project area can be seen on the following page in Figure VII-1. Included in this manual are maintenance sheets taken from the 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (as amended in 2014) for the following facilities/activities: Catch Basins: Concrete structures with steel grates that collect stormwater runoff from the site and act as junctions for storm conveyance pipes. Infiltration Facilities/Perforated Stub -out Connections: Subsurface trenches backfilled with a coarse stone aggregate, allowing for temporary storage of stormwater runoff in the voids of the aggregate. Runoff is distributed through the trench with a perforated pipe and gradually infiltrates into the surrounding soil. Vegetation Management: Landscaping can include grading, soil transfer, vegetation removal, pesticide and fertilizer applications, and watering. Stormwater contaminants include toxic organic compounds, heavy metals, oils, total suspended solids, coliform bacteria, fertilizers, and pesticides. Facilities shall be inspected for defects listed in the following facility sheets. Most maintenance tasks are generally reactionary to a defect being found, rather than a matter of constant upkeep. It is generally expected that few to none of these defects will be present upon the yearly inspection of each facility. The facility sheets list the potential conditions warranting maintenance and the expected result following any maintenance. Several engineer's notes for specific tasks are provided within the facility sheets. Unless otherwise noted on the facility sheets the maintenance tasks should be performed on an "as needed" basis: (a) when the described defect is visible to whomever performs the yearly inspection, or (b) should any defect become apparent between inspections. C CM ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 113 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VII, Page 4 C �M ENGINEERING Figure VII-1. Map of project area (from Edmonds GIS). Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 114 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. r SD _ 6PVG SW IE=9.31 12'"CONC NNE IE=9.21 12"CONC SW IE=8.86 G* G* � I .'-. SS SSA SS SS SS 55 SS \ � SS \ S;S I I .: _ H SS SS � I � I I I ADMIRAL WAY / N J W" / W* W. _ TVPEII CBW/SOLID LID 3 I I RIM: 12.16 i 13 3 1 I I I I 1 3 IE(6"PVCW):9.14 = IE (6" PVC SWJ: 9.14 PVC S): 9.14 1 F 12.76 12.26 �� 1239 1216 j _ _ a _ _ __J L____ 3 L I - I--- ----___-- 11.76 1LE62 C3. C3. ice__________ _______________________________ � IE (6"PVC- 9.14 I m ______J e -- - - - - - - - - - - - _[_j_TOC: 12.65 D OC: 12,54 D TOC: 12.26 ��. D TOC: 12.12a�D TOWING 12.66 % � � .4 112.76 D 12.743 D DD ° D °. 12.48 12.70 12.64 . D -.. _ ° ° 12,26 12451 ' 16" I rS - - _- -----� �- -°- '\ O 1/8D 2F STEPSF " Q 3 \ ! 12.44 12.54 R ----..-- 1 6 I 0 / / �' E P G UTILITY � \ 12.84 \ 13.42 (2)STEPS @ 7" 12.53- 13.11 J ° D _ 0 TOC: 13.961 � TRENCH I I \ 14.00 ENTRY: 14.00 2'x10' PERFORATED STUB 13.40 / 1� 3 OUTCONNECTION I MAX 2 \ 1 L 0 C3.3 IE: 9.80 e / DRY UTILITIES BY OTHERS I 12.84 12.74 ROOF AN D FOOTI NG DRAIN I eI 12.48 I I � 12.84 � I I / I I N I I I I I I (2)STEPS @ 7" 14.00 _ 3- ENTRY: 14.00 - 13.42 14.00- (2) STEPS @ 7" 13.42 -14.00 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 14.0 \ I TOG: 13.91 � 13.41 ID1 13.69 LANDING AREA(1.5% MAX CROSS SLOPE) D 13.61 13.97 2e2' 10' PERFORATED STUB \ D C3.3 OUTCONNECTION IE: 10.80 ° 13.78 H�q ^b TOC: 13.91 1 . \ 13.24 ® \ 13.59 __ \ 13.32 � 13.2424 13.51 13.43 13.16 TOC: 13.87 SDCO,TYP SS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES: _ 1. SOILS REPORT REPORT NUMBER: 1527002.010.011 PREPARED BY: LANDAU ASSOCIATES G* DATED: I UNE 22, 2017 2. A MINIMUM OF T HORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND V VERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN DRY UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC) AND SEWER, WATER AND STORM, AND A MINIMUM OF 5' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND V VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM ANY CITY OWNED LINES. SS 3. NEW/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (INCLUDING ROW): 19,8845E - NEW BUILDING: 6,652 SF ROOF AREA. RUNOFF ROUTED TO DETENTION PIPE THROUGH ROOF DRAINS. - NEW SIDEWALK: 1,033 SF. RUNOFF COLLECTED BY CATCH BASINS. NEW DRIVEWAY: 11,075 SF. RUNOFF COLLECTED BY CATCH BASINS. _ - LANDSAPCING 1,877 SF. RUNOFF COLLECTED BY CATCH BASINS. - ROW SIDEWALK: 1,124 SF. RUNOFF FLOWS INTO ADMIRAL WAY. W. 3 11.62____ rLFF@0.5% c \ MODULAR WETLAND 'YlRIM 1 (MWS) \ L RIM 12.0M IE IN (6' PVC 5): 9.47 IE IN (6" PVC W): 9.47 IE OUT 16" PVC N): .7M 1 C3. 13.28 13.04 -12.72 \ II -12.96 ______________ I F - 0./F - R/F\RR/ol R/F R/F - R/F - q/F - R/F 13.08 of 13.68 J 14.00 / \ @ _ I I - \ I I I I \ I I I I j TVPEICB 2 3 4 I I RIM:12.17IE(6" DIP E:30.67 12 74I 13.25 12.71 `.6%I 1 27 1�% TYPE ICI RIM: PVC �2.45 O j L 13.5 IE (6" DIP W): 9.92 I IE Z6"PV3 N): 942 D RECYCLE AREA o i 13.50 I 12.69L LL J\j a 12.76 6 CHAINLINK T P GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SCALE: to o 5 10 20 PAVING LEGEND NEWASPHALT OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITY SAWCUT NEW CONCRETE GRADING QUANTITIES TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) - 20 CU YDS TOTAL EMBANKMENT(FILL)- 530 CU YDS TOTAL 550 CU YDS THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE. DO NOT USE FOR BIDDING, PAYMENT, OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES. 4' DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL ALLAROUND, WRAPPED IN 8" IN FROM WOOD. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FABRIC, SLOPE AT 0.5% MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS AS SHOWN 6" DOWNSPOUT TIGHTLINEFINISHED FI N ISHED GRADE III' I' TO CONVEYANCE SYSTEM@ 0.5%MIN. PLACE NEXTTO FOOTING DRAIN OR AS SHOWN ON GRADING & - = - DRAINAGE PLAN-1-" (CONTRACTOR MAY LOCATE ON EITHER SIDE OF o Oo O FOOTING DRAIN) oO�oo � o Do 00 . LINE OF MAX EXCAVATION. O d I F SOIL IS OVEREXCAVATED, 0O0 O�O oO a d REPLACE WITH LEAN MIX CONCRETE / \ `FOOTING y 1 1 �i FOOTING AND ROOF DRAIN SECTION L SCALE: NTS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DAIS BY: _ CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION 5.1.a C CM ENGINEERIN 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 2( EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 980 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 05/ 26 1 m 3 Z w O a > � 0 Z U L7 w w o � w � oA, O Y 0' i DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECK: JOB NO: Si 2116C i DATE: s 03/26 0 Z Ld m Q Z C Z � 0 a -1 cV 0 Q c� < Z Cn -3: "1 Q O 0 J Q C Cl LJ EC o Z f za E 000 Q ZCkf O I� 0 J --t LLJ (, SHEET C3.1 j Packet Pg. 115 1 5.1.a 4.6 Maintenance Standards for Drainage Facilities The facility -specific maintenance standards contained in this section are intended to be conditions for determining if maintenance actions are required as identified through inspection. They are not intended to be measures of the facility's required condition at all times between inspections. In other words, exceedence of these conditions at any time between inspections and/or maintenance does not automatically constitute a violation of these standards. However, based upon inspection observations, the inspection and maintenance schedules shall be adjusted to minimize the length of time that a facility is in a condition that requires a maintenance action. Table 4.5.2 Maintenance Standards No. 1 — Detention Ponds Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance Is Performed General Trash & Debris Any trash and debris which exceed 1 Trash and debris cleared from site. cubic feet per 1,000 square feet. In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. If less than threshold all trash and debris will be removed as part of next scheduled maintenance. Poisonous Any poisonous or nuisance No danger of poisonous vegetation Vegetation and vegetation which may constitute a where maintenance personnel or the noxious weeds hazard to maintenance personnel or public might normally be. (Coordinate the public. with local health department) Any evidence of noxious weeds as Complete eradication of noxious weeds defined by State or local regulations. may not be possible. Compliance with (Apply requirements of adopted IPM State or local eradication policies policies for the use of herbicides). required Contaminants Any evidence of oil, gasoline, and Pollution contaminants or other pollutants P,.,� ,, (Coordinate removal/cleanup with itants water quality response agency). present.local Rodent Holes Any evidence of rodent holes if Rodents destroyed and dam or berm facility is acting as a dam or berm, or repaired. (Coordinate with local health any evidence of water piping through department; coordinate with Ecology dam or berm via rodent holes. Dam Safety Office if pond exceeds 10 acre-feet.) Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-32 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 116 5.1.a No. 1 — Detention Ponds Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance Is Performed Beaver Dams Dam results in change or function of Facility is returned to design function. the facility. (Coordinate trapping of beavers and removal of dams with appropriate permitting agencies) Insects When insects such as wasps and Insects destroyed or removed from site. hornets interfere with maintenance Apply insecticides in compliance with activities. adopted IPM policies Tree Growth Tree growth does not allow Trees do not hinder maintenance and Hazard maintenance access or interferes activities. Harvested trees should be Trees with maintenance activity (i.e., slope recycled into mulch or other beneficial mowing, silt removal, vactoring, or uses (e.g., alders for firewood). equipment movements). If trees are Remove hazard Trees not interfering with access or maintenance, do not remove If dead, diseased, or dying trees are identified (Use a certified Arborist to determine health of tree or removal requirements) Side Slopes Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep Slopes should be stabilized using of Pond where cause of damage is still appropriate erosion control measure(s); present or where there is potential for e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of continued erosion. grass, compaction. Any erosion observed on a If erosion is occurring on compacted compacted berm embankment. berms a licensed civil engineer should be consulted to resolve source of erosion. Storage Area Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds Sediment cleaned out to designed pond 10% of the designed pond depth shape and depth; pond reseeded if unless otherwise specified or affects necessary to control erosion. inletting or outletting condition of the facility. Liner (If Liner is visible and has more than Liner repaired or replaced. Liner is fully Applicable) three 1/4-inch holes in it. covered. Pond Berms Settlements Any part of berm which has settled 4 Dike is built back to the design (Dikes) inches lower than the design elevation. elevation. If settlement is apparent, measure berm to determine amount of settlement. Settling can be an indication of more severe problems with the berm or outlet works. A licensed civil engineer should be consulted to determine the source of the settlement. Piping Discernable water flow through pond Piping eliminated. Erosion potential berm. Ongoing erosion with potential resolved. for erosion to continue. (Recommend a Goethechnical engineer be called in to inspect and evaluate condition and recommend repair of condition. Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-33 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 117 5.1.a No. 1 — Detention Ponds Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance Is Performed Emergency Tree Growth Tree growth on emergency spillways Trees should be removed. If root Overflow/ creates blockage problems and may system is small (base less than 4 Spillway and cause failure of the berm due to inches) the root system may be left in Berms over 4 uncontrolled overtopping. place. Otherwise the roots should be feet in height. Tree growth on berms over 4 feet in removed and the berm restored. A height may lead to piping through the licensed civil engineer should be consulted for proper berm/spillway berm which could lead to failure of restoration. the berm. Piping Discernable water flow through pond Piping eliminated. Erosion potential berm. Ongoing erosion with potential resolved. for erosion to continue. (Recommend a Goethechnical engineer be called in to inspect and evaluate condition and recommend repair of condition. Emergency Emergency Only one layer of rock exists above Rocks and pad depth are restored to Overflow/ Overflow/ native soil in area five square feet or design standards. Spillway Spillway larger, or any exposure of native soil at the top of out flow path of spillway. (Rip -rap on inside slopes need not be replaced.) Erosion See "Side Slopes of Pond" Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-34 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 118 5.1.a No. 2 — Infiltration Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance Is Performed General Trash & Debris See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). Poisonous/Noxious See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" Vegetation (No. 1). Contaminants and See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" Pollution (No. 1). Rodent Holes See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1) Storage Area Sediment Water ponding in infiltration pond after Sediment is removed rainfall ceases and appropriate time and/or facility is cleaned allowed for infiltration. Treatment basins so that infiltration system should infiltrate Water Quality Design Storm works according to Volume within 48 hours, and empty within design. 24 hours after cessation of most rain events. (A percolation test pit or test of facility indicates facility is only working at 90% of its designed capabilities. Test every 2 to 5 years. If two inches or more sediment is present, remove). Filter Bags (if Filled with Sediment and debris fill bag more than 1/2 Filter bag is replaced or applicable) Sediment and full. system is redesigned. Debris Rock Filters Sediment and By visual inspection, little or no water flows Gravel in rock filter is Debris through filter during heavy rain storms. replaced. Side Slopes of Erosion See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" Pond (No. 1). Emergency Tree Growth See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" Overflow Spillway (No. 1). and Berms over 4 feet in height. Piping See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). Emergency Rock Missing See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" Overflow Spillway (No. 1). Erosion See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). Pre -settling Facility or sump 6" or designed sediment trap depth of Sediment is removed. Ponds and Vaults filled with Sediment sediment. and/or debris Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-35 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 119 5.1.a No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed General Trash & Trash or debris which is located immediately No Trash or debris located Debris in front of the catch basin opening or is immediately in front of blocking inletting capacity of the basin by catch basin or on grate more than 10%. opening. Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 60 No trash or debris in the percent of the sump depth as measured from catch basin. the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of six inches clearance from the debris surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe Inlet and outlet pipes free blocking more than 1/3 of its height. of trash or debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could No dead animals or generate odors that could cause complaints vegetation present within or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). the catch basin. Sediment Sediment (in the basin) that exceeds 60 No sediment in the catch percent of the sump depth as measured from basin the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of 6 inches clearance from the sediment surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Structure Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Top slab is free of holes Damage to inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch and cracks. Frame and/or Top Slab (Intent is to make sure no material is running into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., Frame is sitting flush on separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame the riser rings or top slab from the top slab. Frame not securely and firmly attached. attached Fractures or Maintenance person judges that structure is Basin replaced or repaired Cracks in unsound. to design standards. Basin Walls/ Bottom Grout fillet has separated or cracked wider Pipe is regrouted and than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the secure at basin wall. joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ If failure of basin has created a safety, Basin replaced or repaired Misalignment function, or design problem. to design standards. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking more No vegetation blocking than 10% of the basin opening. opening to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints No vegetation or root that is more than six inches tall and less than growth present. six inches apart. Contamination See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). No pollution present. and Pollution Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-38 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 120 5.1.a No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed Catch Basin Cover Not in Cover is missing or only partially in place. Catch basin cover is Cover Place Any open catch basin requires maintenance. closed Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with Mechanism maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts proper tools. Not Working into frame have less than 112 inch of thread. Cover Difficult One maintenance person cannot remove lid Cover can be removed by to Remove after applying normal lifting pressure. one maintenance person. (Intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance.) Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, not Ladder meets design Unsafe securely attached to basin wall, standards and allows misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. maintenance person safe access. Metal Grates Grate opening Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate opening meets (If Applicable) Unsafe design standards. Trash and Trash and debris that is blocking more than Grate free of trash and Debris 20% of grate surface inletting capacity. debris. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of the Grate is in place and Missing. grate. meets design standards. No. 6 — Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Racks) Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Results Expected When Components Needed Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Trash or debris that is plugging more Barrier cleared to design flow Debris than 20% of the openings in the barrier. capacity. Metal Damaged/ Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 Bars in place with no bends more Missing inches. than 3/4 inch. Bars. Bars are missing or entire barrier Bars in place according to design. missing. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% Barrier replaced or repaired to deterioration to any part of barrier. design standards. Inlet/Outlet Debris barrier missing or not attached to Barrier firmly attached to pipe Pipe pipe Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-39 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 121 5.1.a No. 18 — Catchbasin Inserts Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance is Performed General Sediment When sediment forms a cap over the No sediment cap on the insert Accumulation insert media of the insert and/or unit. media and its unit. Trash and Trash and debris accumulates on insert Trash and debris removed Debris unit creating a blockage/restriction. from insert unit. Runoff freely Accumulation flows into catch basin. Media Insert Not Effluent water from media insert has a Effluent water from media Removing Oil visible sheen. insert is free of oils and has no visible sheen. Media Insert Catch basin insert is saturated with water Remove and replace media Water Saturated and no longer has the capacity to insert absorb. Media Insert -Oil Media oil saturated due to petroleum spill Remove and replace media Saturated that drains into catch basin. insert. Media Insert Use Media has been used beyond the typical Remove and replace media at Beyond Normal average life of media insert product. regular intervals, depending on Product Life insert product. Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — Deeember 2014 4-51 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 122 5.1.a S406 BMPs for Streets/ Highways Applicable BMPs: • Select de and anti-icers that cause the least adverse environmental impact. Apply only as needed using minimum quantities. • Where practicable use roadway deicers, such as calcium magnesium acetate, potassium acetate, or similar materials, that cause less adverse environmental impact than urea, and sodium chloride. • Store and transfer de and anti -icing materials on an impervious containment pad in accordance with BMP Storage or Trans Qutside)of Solid Raw Materials, By -Products, or Finished Products in this volume. • Sweep/clean up accumulated de and anti -icing materials and grit from roads as soon as possible after the road surface clears. Recommended Additional BMPs Intensify roadway cleaning in early spring to help remove particulates from road surfaces. • Include limits on toxic metals in the specifications for de/anti-icers S407 BMPs for Dust Control at Disturbed Land Areas and Unpaved Roadways and Parking Lots Description of Pollutant Sources: Dust can cause air and water pollution problems particularly at demolition sites and in and areas where reduced rainfall exposes soil particles to transport by air. Pollutant Control Approach: Minimize dust generation and apply environmentally friendly and government approved dust suppressant chemicals, if necessary. Applicable Operational BMPs: • Sprinkle or wet down soil or dust with water as long as it does not result in a wastewater discharge. • Use only local and/or state government approved dust suppressant chemicals such as those listed in Ecology Publication #96-433, Techniques for Dust Prevention and Suppression. • Avoid excessive and repeated applications of dust suppressant chemicals. Time the application of dust suppressants to avoid or minimize their wash -off by rainfall or human activity such as irrigation. • Apply stormwater containment to prevent the conveyance of sediment into storm drains or receiving waters. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-15 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 123 5.1.a Ecology prohibits the use of motor oil for dust control. Take care when using lignin derivatives and other high BOD chemicals in areas susceptible to contaminating surface water or ground water. Consult with Ecology and the local permitting authority on discharge permit requirements if the dust suppression process results in a wastewater discharge to the ground, ground water, storm drain, or surface water. Recommended Additional Operational BMPs for Roadways and Other Trafficked Areas: • Consider limiting use of off -road recreational vehicles on dust generating land. • Consider graveling or paving unpaved permanent roads and other trafficked areas at municipal, commercial, and industrial areas. • Consider paving or stabilizing shoulders of paved roads with gravel, vegetation, or local government approved chemicals. • Encourage use of alternate paved routes, if available. • Vacuum sweep fine dirt and skid control materials from paved roads soon after winter weather ends or when needed. • Consider using pre -washed traction sand to reduce dust emissions. Additional Recommended Operational BMPs for Dust Generating Areas: • Prepare a dust control plan. Helpful references include: Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources (EPA-450/3-88-088), and Fugitive Dust Background Document and Technical Information Document for Best Available Control Measures (EPA-450/2-92-004). • Limit exposure of soil (dust source) as much as feasible. • Stabilize dust -generating soil by growing and maintaining vegetation, mulching, topsoiling, and/or applying stone, sand, or gravel. • Apply windbreaks in the soil such as trees, board fences, tarp curtains, bales of hay, etc. S408 BMPs for Dust Control at Manufacturing Areas Description of Pollutant Sources: Industrial material handling activities can generate considerable amounts of dust that is typically removed using exhaust systems. Mixing cement and concrete products and handling powdered materials can also generate dust. Particulate materials that can cause air pollution include grain dust, sawdust, coal, gravel, crushed rock, cement, and boiler fly ash. Air emissions can contaminate stormwater. The objective of this BMP is to reduce the stormwater pollutants caused by dust generation and control. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-16 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 124 5.1.a Applicable Operational BMPs: • Eliminate unpermitted wastewater discharges to s rm sewer, ground water, or surface water. • Convey unpermitted discharges to a sanitary ewer if allowed by the local sewer authority, or to other approve reatment. Obtain appropriate state and local pe ' s for these discharges. Rec mended Additional Operation BMPs: At commercial and indust ' 1 facilities, conduct a survey wastewater discharge connections to storm ins and to surface wate s follows: • Conduct field survey of bu' dings, particularly older buildings, and other indus ' 1 areas to to to storm drains from buildings and paved surfaces. Note here th e join the public storm drain(s). • During non -storm r conditions inspect each storm drain for non- stormwater dischar e Record the locations of all non-stormwater discharges. Incl e all p itted discharges. • If useful, pre re a map of ch area. Show on the map the known location of orm sewers, sam sewers, and permitted and unpermi d discharges. Aerial p tos may be useful. Check records such a iping schematics to identi own side sewer connections and ow these on the map. Consider 'ng smoke, dye, or chemical an ysis tests to detect connections betw two conveyance systems .g., process water and stormwater). If desi ble, conduct TV inspections of the storm drains and record the otage on videotape. Compare the observed locations of connections th the information on the map and revise the map accordingly. Note s ect connections that are inconsistent with the field survey. • Identify all connections to storm sewers or to surface wa and take the actions specified above as applicable BMPs. S411 BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/ Vegetation Management Description of Pollutant Sources: Landscaping can include grading, soil transfer, vegetation removal, pesticide and fertilizer applications, and watering. Stormwater contaminants include toxic organic compounds, heavy metals, oils, total suspended solids, coliform bacteria, fertilizers, and pesticides. Lawn and vegetation management can include control of objectionable weeds, insects, mold, bacteria, and other pests with pesticides. Examples include weed control on golf course lawns, access roads, and utility corridors and during landscaping; sap stain and insect control on lumber and logs; rooftop moss removal; killing nuisance rodents; fungicide application to patio decks, and residential lawn/plant care. It is possible to Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-21 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 125 5.1.a release toxic pesticides such as pentachlorophenol, carbamates, and organometallics to the environment by leaching and dripping from treated parts, container leaks, product misuse, and outside storage of pesticide contaminated materials and equipment. Poor management of the vegetation and poor application of pesticides or fertilizers can cause appreciable stormwater contamination. Pollutant Control Approach: Control of fertilizer and pesticide applications, soil erosion, and site debris to prevent contamination of stormwater. Develop and implement an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPM) and use pesticides only as a last resort. Carefully apply pesticides/ herbicides, in accordance with label instructions. Maintain appropriate vegetation, with proper fertilizer application where practicable, to control erosion and the discharge of stormwater pollutants. Where practicable grow plant species appropriate for the site, or adjust the soil properties of the subject site to grow desired plant species. Applicable Operational BMPs for Landscaping: • Install engineered soil/landscape systems to improve the infiltration and regulation of stormwater in landscaped areas. Do not dispose of collected vegetation into waterways or storm sewer systems. Recommended Additional Operational BMPs for Landscaping: • Conduct mulch -mowing whenever practicable • Dispose of grass clippings, leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation, by composting, if feasible. • Use mulch or other erosion control measures on soils exposed for more than one week during the dry season or two days during the rainy season. • Store and maintain appropriate oil and chemical spill cleanup materials in readily accessible locations when using oil or other chemicals. Ensure that employees are familiar with proper spill cleanup procedures. • Till fertilizers into the soil rather than dumping or broadcasting onto the surface. Determine the proper fertilizer application rate for the types of soil and vegetation encountered. • Till a topsoil mix or composted organic material into the soil to create a well -mixed transition layer that encourages deeper root systems and drought -resistant plants. • Use manual and/or mechanical methods of vegetation removal rather than applying herbicides, where practical. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-22 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 126 5.1.a Applicable Operational BMPs for the Use of Pesticides: • Develop and implement an IPM (See section on IPM in ,4pplicable e Operational BMPs for Vegetation Manyg ment) and use pesticides only as a last resort. • Implement a pesticide -use plan and include at a minimum: a list of selected pesticides and their specific uses; brands, formulations, application methods and quantities to be used; equipment use and maintenance procedures; safety, storage, and disposal methods; and monitoring, record keeping, and public notice procedures. All procedures shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 17.21 RCW and Chapter 16-228 WAC (Appendix IV-D R.7). • Choose the least toxic pesticide available that is capable of reducing the infestation to acceptable levels. The pesticide should readily degrade in the environment and/or have properties that strongly bind it to the soil. Conduct any pest control activity at the life stage when the pest is most vulnerable. For example, if it is necessary to use a Bacillus thuringiens application to control tent caterpillars, apply it to the material before the caterpillars cocoon or it will be ineffective. Any method used should be site -specific and not used wholesale over a wide area. • Apply the pesticide according to label directions. Do not apply pesticides in quantities that exceed manufacturer's instructions. • Mix the pesticides and clean the application equipment in an area where accidental spills will not enter surface or ground waters, and will not contaminate the soil. • Store pesticides in enclosed areas or in covered impervious containment. Do not discharge pesticide contaminated stormwater or spills/leaks of pesticides to storm sewers. Do not hose down the paved areas to a storm sewer or conveyance ditch. Store and maintain appropriate spill cleanup materials in a location known to all near the storage area. • Clean up any spilled pesticides. Keep pesticide contaminated waste materials in designated covered and contained areas. • The pesticide application equipment must be capable of immediate shutoff in the event of an emergency. • Spraying pesticides within 100 feet of open waters including wetlands, ponds, and rivers, streams, creeks, sloughs and any drainage ditch or channel that leads to open water may have additional regulatory requirements beyond just following the pesticide product label. Additional requirements may include: • Obtaining a discharge permit from Ecology. • Obtaining a permit from the local jurisdiction. • Using an aquatic labeled pesticide. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-23 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 127 5.1.a obtain a publication entitled "Suspended, Canceled, and Restricted Pesticides " which lists all restricted pesticides and the specific uses that are allowed. Applicable Operational BMPs for Vegetation Management: Use at least an eight -inch "topsoil" layer with at least 8 percent organic matter to provide a sufficient vegetation -growing medium. Amending existing landscapes and turf systems by increasing the percent organic matter and depth of topsoil can substantially improve the permeability of the soil, the disease and drought resistance of the vegetation, and reduce fertilizer demand. This reduces the demand for fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Organic matter is the least water-soluble form of nutrients that can be added to the soil. Composted organic matter generally releases only between 2 and 10 percent of its total nitrogen annually, and this release corresponds closely to the plant growth cycle. Return natural plant debris and mulch to the soil, to continue recycling nutrients indefinitely. Select the appropriate turfgrass mixture for the climate and soil type. Certain tall fescues and rye grasses resist insect attack because the symbiotic endophytic fungi found naturally in their tissues repel or kill common leaf and stem -eating lawn insects. However, they do not, repel root -feeding lawn pests such as Crane Fly larvae, and are toxic to ruminants such as cattle and sheep. The fungus causes no known adverse effects to the host plant or to humans. Endophytic grasses are commercially available; use them in areas such as parks or golf courses where grazing does not occur. Local agricultural or gardening resources such as Washington State University Extension office can offer advice on which types of grass are best suited to the area and soil type. • Use the following seeding and planting BMPs, or equivalent BMPs to obtain information on grass mixtures, temporary and permanent seeding procedures, maintenance of a recently planted area, and fertilizer application rates: Temporary and Permanent Seeding, Mulching, Plastic Covering, and Sodding as described in Volume II. Adjusting the soil properties of the subject site can assist in selection of desired plant species. For example, design a constructed wetland to resist the invasion of reed canary grass by layering specific strata of organic matters (e.g., composted forest product residuals) and creating a mildly acidic pH and carbon -rich soil medium. Consult a soil restoration specialist for site -specific conditions. • Aerate lawns regularly in areas of heavy use where the soil tends to become compacted. Conduct aeration while the grasses in the lawn are growing most vigorously. Remove layers of thatch greater than 3/4-inch deep. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-25 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 128 5.1.a Mowing is a stress -creating activity for turfgrass. Grass decreases its productivity when mown too short and there is less growth of roots and rhizomes. The turf becomes less tolerant of environmental stresses, more disease prone and more reliant on outside means such as pesticides, fertilizers, and irrigation to remain healthy. Set the mowing height at the highest acceptable level and mow at times and intervals designed to minimize stress on the turf. Generally mowing only 1/3 of the grass blade height will prevent stressing the turf. Irrigation: The depth from which a plant normally extracts water depends on the rooting depth of the plant. Appropriately irrigated lawn grasses normally root in the top 6 to 12 inches of soil; lawns irrigated on a daily basis often root only in the top 1 inch of soil. Improper irrigation can encourage pest problems, leach nutrients, and make a lawn completely dependent on artificial watering. The amount of water applied depends on the normal rooting depth of the turfgrass species used, the available water holding capacity of the soil, and the efficiency of the irrigation system. Consult with the local water utility, Conservation District, or Cooperative Extension office to help determine optimum irrigation practices. Fertilizer Management: Turfgrass is most responsive to nitrogen fertilization, followed by potassium and phosphorus. Fertilization needs vary by site depending on plant, soil, and climatic conditions. Evaluation of soil nutrient levels through regular testing ensures the best possible efficiency and economy of fertilization. For details on soils testing, contact the local Conservation District, a soils testing professional, or a Washington State University Extension office. Apply fertilizers in amounts appropriate for the target vegetation and at the time of year that minimizes losses to surface and ground waters. Do not fertilize when the soil is dry. Alternatively, do not apply fertilizers within three days prior to predicted rainfall. The longer the period between fertilizer application and either rainfall or irrigation, the less fertilizer runoff occurs. Use slow release fertilizers such as methylene urea, IDBU, or resin coated fertilizers when appropriate, generally in the spring. Use of slow release fertilizers is especially important in areas with sandy or gravelly soils. Time the fertilizer application to periods of maximum plant uptake. Ecology generally recommends application in the fall and spring, although Washington State University turf specialists recommend four fertilizer applications per year. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-26 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 129 5.1.a Recommended Treatment BMPs: Install biofiltration swales and filter strips — (See Chapter 9, Volume V) to treat roadside runoff wherever practicable and use engineered topsoils wherever necessary to maintain adequate vegetation. These systems can improve infiltration and stormwater pollutant control upstream of roadside ditches. S417 BMPs for Maintenance of Stormwater Drainage and Treatment Systems Description of Pollutant Sources: Facilities include roadside catch basins A on arterials and within residential areas, conveyance systems, detention E facilities such as ponds and vaults, oil/water separators, biofilters, settling Q basins, infiltration systems, and all other types of stormwater treatment systems presented in Volume V. Oil and grease, hydrocarbons, debris, o heavy metals, sediments and contaminated water are found in catch basins, E oil and water separators, settling basins, etc. 4- Pollutant Control Approach: Provide maintenance and cleaning of 0 o debris, sediments, and oil from stormwater collection, conveyance, and a treatment systems to obtain proper operation. N c Applicable Operational BMPs: 0 N Maintain stormwater treatment facilities per the operations and 0 z maintenance (O&M) procedures presented in Section 4.6 of Volume V in a addition to the following BMPs: • Inspect and clean treatment BMPs, conveyance systems, and catch c basins as needed, and determine necessary O&M improvements. • Promptly repair any deterioration threatening the structural integrity of 0 a stormwater facilities. These include replacement of clean -out gates, catch basin lids, and rock in emergency spillways. 3 • Ensure adequacy of storm sewer capacities and prevent heavy C sediment discharges to the sewer system. • Regularly remove debris and sludge from BMPs used for peak -rate control, treatment, etc. and discharge to a sanitary sewer if approved N T by the sewer authority, or truck to an appropriate local or state o government approved disposal site. N • Clean catch basins when the depth of deposits reaches 60 percent of 0 z the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to the invert of a the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. However, in no case should there be less than six inches clearance from the debris surface to the E invert of the lowest pipe. Some catch basins (for example, WSDOT Type 1 L basins) may have as little as 12 inches sediment storage Q below the invert. These catch basins need frequent inspection and cleaning to prevent scouring. Where these catch basins are part of a stormwater collection and treatment system, the system Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-3 7 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 130 5.1.a owner/operator may choose to concentrate maintenance efforts on downstream control devices as part of a systems approach. Clean woody debris in a catch basin as frequently as needed to ensure proper operation of the catchbasin. Post warning signs; "Dump No Waste - Drains to Ground Water," "Streams," "Lakes," or emboss on or adjacent to all storm drain inlets where possible. • Disposal of sediments and liquids from the catch basins must comply with "Recommendations for Management of Street Wastes" described in Appendix IV-G of this volume. Additional Applicable BMPs: Select additional applicable BMPs from this chapter depending on the pollutant sources and activities conducted at the facility. Those BMPs include: • S425 BMPs for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control at Industrial Sites • S427 BMPs for Storage of Liquid, Food Waste, or Dangerous Waste Containers • S406 BMPs for Spills of Oil and Hazardous Substances • S410 BMPs for Illicit Connections to Storm Drains • S430 BMPs for Urban Streets S418 BMPs for Manufacturing Activities - Outside Description of Pollutant Sources: Manufacturing pollutant sources z include outside process areas, stack emissions, and areas where manufacturing activity has taken place in the past and significant exposed a pollutant materials remain. 3 Pollution Control Approach: Cover and contain outside manufacturing c and prevent stormwater run-on and contamination, where feasible. 0. Applicable Operational BMP: • Sweep paved areas regularly, as needed, to prevent contamination of N stormwater. o 0 • Alter the activity by eliminating or minimizing the contamination of c stormwater. N z • Applicable Structural Source Control BMPs: Enclose the activity J a (see Figure 2.2.6): If possible, enclose the manufacturing activity in a building. E • Cover the activity and connect floor drains to a sanitary sewer, if M approved by the local sewer authority. Berm or slope the floor as Q needed to prevent drainage of pollutants to outside areas. (Figure 2.2.7) Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-38 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 131 5.1.a Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Requirements, Ecology, March 2011,website: http://www.ecy.wa.aov/biblio/94146.html. Apply the BMPs in that guidance document to scrap material recycling facilities depending on the pollutant sources existing at those facilities. S424 BMPs for Roof/ Building Drains at Manufacturing and Commercial Buildings Description of Pollutant Sources: Stormwater runoff from roofs and sides of manufacturing and commercial buildings can be sources of pollutants caused by leaching of roofing materials, building vents, and other air emission sources. Research has identified vapors and entrained liquid and solid droplets/particles as potential pollutants in roof/building runoff. Metals, solvents, acidic/alkaline pH, BOD, and organics, are some of the pollutant constituents identified. Ecology has performed a study on zinc in industrial stormwater. The study is presented in Ecology Publication 08-10-025 Suggested Practices to reduce Zinc Concentrations in Industrial Stormwater Discharges, website: htlp://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0810025.html. The user should refer to this document for more details on addressing zinc in stormwater. Pollutant Control Approach: Evaluate the potential sources of stormwater pollutants and apply source control BMPs where feasible. Applicable Operational Source Control BMPs: • If leachates and/or emissions from buildings are suspected sources of stormwater pollutants, then sample and analyze the stormwater draining from the building. • Sweep the area routinely to remove any zinc residuals. If a roof/building stormwater pollutant source is identified, implement appropriate source control measures such as air pollution control equipment, selection of materials, operational changes, material recycle, process changes, etc. Applicable Structural Source Control BMPs: Paint/coat the galvanized surfaces as described in Ecology Publication # 09-10-025_ Applicable Treatment BMPs: Treat runoff from roofs to the appropriate level. The facility may use enhanced treatment BMPs as described in Volume V of the SWMMWW. Some facilities regulated by the Industrial Stormwater General Permit, or local jurisdiction, may have requirements than cannot be achieved with enhanced treatment BMPs. In these cases, additional treatment measures may be required. A treatment method for meeting stringent requirements such as Chitosan-Enhanced Sand Filtration may be appropriate. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-46 Attachment 4 Packet Pg. 132 Port of Edmonds Admin Building - CG #21160.20 Drainage Report March 26,2021 Section VII, Page 5 SAMPLE ACTIVITY LOG DATE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PERFORMED RESULTS / NOTES C 4M ENGINEERING Attachment 4 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 133 5.1.a Form #E82 INFORMATION FOR Transportation Impact Analysis Requirements PERMITTING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 121 5th Avenue N P: 425.771.0220 www.edmondswa.gov TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES SHALL BE COLLECTED from any applicant seeking development approval from the city as provided in ECC Chapter 3.36. This shall include, but is not limited to, the development of residential, commercial, retail, office space, and includes the expansion or change of existing uses that create a demand for additional public facilities. PAYMENT OF FEES Impact fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit or city business license. EXEMPTIONS ECC 3.36.040 identifies particular development activities in which exemptions may apply. Please refer to this code section for additional information. The director shall make the final determination as to whether the exemption is applicable. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) WORKSHEET or TRAFFIC STUDY When applicable, one of the following shall be submitted with your land use or building permit application: Appendix A - For projects that generate less than 25 peak -hour trips, complete the TIA worksheet found in Appendix A. -or- Appendix B - For projects that generate more than 25 peak -hour trips, provide a traffic study that complies with and addresses Appendix B. The traffic study shall be prepared by a qualified professional in the field of transportation engineering. TIMING AND CALCULATION OF FEES Impact fees shall be assessed based upon the impact fee rates in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit, including but not limited to, change of use permit or remodel permit. In the event the development activity does not require a building permit, impact fees will be assessed at the time of issuance of the business license. The 2017-2019 Impact Fee Rate Table incorporated herein shall be used to determine the applicable ITE Land Use Category and associated per unit impact fee rate.' • CHANGE IN USE Impact Fee for NEW use — Impact fee for PRE VIO US use = Impact feel When calculating impact fees for a change in use of an existing building or dwelling unit, including any alteration, expansion, replacement or new accessory building, the impact fee shall be the applicable impact fee for the ITE land use of the new use, less an amount equal to the applicable impact fee for the ITE land use of the prior use, established at the time the prior use was permitted. Refer to Fee Rate Tables, incorporated herein. If the previous use was permitted prior to 9/12/04 (adoption of Ordinance 3516), the 2004 Impact Fee Rate Table shall be used. • INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION An Independent Fee Calculation may be submitted in accordance with ECC 3.36.130 if none of the fee categories or fee amounts set forth in the 2017-2019 Impact Fee Rate Table describe or capture the impacts of a new development.3 Updated on1112512020 Attachment 5 P Packet Pg. 134 5.1.a Form #E82 TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT DO NOT TRIGGER IMPACT FEES The following list is intended to provide examples of projects that are exempted from the payment of street impact fees as identified in ECC 3.36.040. The examples provided do not involve a change in use and do not expand the usable space or add any residential units and therefore, do not create additional demand on the roadway system. Traffic impact fees will not be required as a condition of development approval for these types of projects. ❑ A project that involves demolition of one single family residential unit and replacement with one new single family residential unit on the same lot and within 12 months of demolition. ❑ A residential remodel that does not increase the number of residential units. ❑ A residential addition (e.g. garage, etc.) that does not increase the number of residential units. ❑ Decks, fences, retaining walls, etc. ❑ Accessory dwelling unit (ADU). (Approval of an ADU is regulated by the Edmonds Community Development Code, which limits the total number of individuals living at the property to one "family" as defined in the code) TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT DO TRIGGER IMPACT FEES The following project examples do increase the number of residential units or involve commercial or other activity using the roadway system and therefore, do create additional demand on the roadway system. Street impact fees shall be required as a condition of development approval for these types of projects. ❑ Construction of a single family residence on a previously undeveloped, vacant or subdivided lot. ❑ Demolition of a single family residence and construction of a commercial, mixed -use or multi -family facility or duplex on the same property. ❑ A tenant improvement that changes the use from general office to medical office. ❑ Remodel of an existing multi -family building that increases the number of residential units. Note: This information should not be used as a substitute for City codes and regulations. Edmonds City Code may be viewed at http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/. The applicant is responsible for ensuring compliance with the fees and regulations that are applicable at the time of submittal. If you have a specific question about a certain aspect of your project, please contact the Engineering Division at 121 5th Ave N or (425) 771-0220. Please note that other local, state, and/or federal permits or approvals may be required. Impact fee rates can also be referenced in ECC 3.36.125. 2 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. 3 Additional fee for Independent Fee Calculation: $240 review fee plus actual cost of outside consultant review if required by City. Updated on 11/25/2020 Attachment 5 J Packet Pg. 135 P APPENDIX 5.1.a Page 1 of 2 Transportation Impact Analysis Worksheet .,,r. 1�14V PERMITTING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 121 5th Avenue N P: 425.771.0220 www.edmondswa.gov Name of Proposed Project: Port of Edmonds Administration Buildin Owner/Applicant Port of Edmonds, ATTN: Robert McChesney Name 336 Admiral Way Street/Mailing Address Edmonds WA 98020 City State Zip Telephone: 425.774.0549 Applicant Contact Person: Jackson Main Architecture, Meghan Craig Name 311 First Avenue South Street/Mailing Address Seattle WA 98104 City State Zip Telephone: 206.324.4800 Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Telephone: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Contact Name E-mail: a. Location - Street address: 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 (Attach a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: Project site is currently a gravel parking lot. With the demolition of the existing building, the new admin. bldg. is not a complete new add to traffic in the area. The Port would like to discuss credit options, as discussed in pre -application meeting. c Specify proposed type and size of development: Construction of new retail (M), Office (B) and maintenance shOD (S) within a footarint of 6.652 sf. d. Date construction will begin and be completed: 2022 - 2023 e Define proposed access locations: Admiral Way Attachment 5 1Packet Pg. 136 5.1.a APPENDIX A Page 2 of 2 f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: Access will be designed to meet site distance requirements. 2. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the attached Impact Fee Rate Tables and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. ❑ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, vfp, etc. New Use $ X Prior Use $ X Fee i New Use Fee: $ 1 - I Prior Use Fee: $ 1 = $ K NEW DEVELOPMENT New Use ❑ OTHER Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, vfp, etc. 110 7.91 X 3,936 sf 826 $ 4.48 2,245 sf $ 10,057.60 MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: $102 186.25 INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $240.00 + consultant fee $ 240.00 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE $102,426.25 City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date ' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 137 I 5.1.a I IF D4f Traffic Study PERMITTING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 121 5th Avenue N P: 425.771.0220 www.edmondswa.gov ❑ Name of Proposed Project ❑ Contact Information for: ✓ Owner ✓ Applicant ✓ Traffic Engineer who prepared the Study 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION —provide the follo n a. Location —Include street address, vicinity ap b. Specify existing land use. c. Specify proposed type and size of de elopment square footage of building. d. Date construction will begin an e completed. e. Define proposed access locati ns. and site plan. APPENDIX "B Page I of 4 State number of residential units and/or f. Define proposed sight dista ce at site egress locations. 2. TRIP GENERATION — pro de the following: Source shall be the Ninth E 'tion of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For i ependent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Dail raffic PM Peak -hour trip AM, noon or school peak may also apply, depending on location and as directed by the C' y Engineer) a. Existing Site Trin Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT 7 Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 138 APPENDIX Page 2 of 4 1 5.1.a I b. Proposed Project Trio Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak-HAr Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) I IN I OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted passby trips. 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution ercentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the Cit Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of t e City traffic model .2 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AP a. Have sight distance requirements at egress to b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analy s: Intersections to be evaluated shall be de rmi) TY been met per AASHTO requirements? by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Chan of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelizaf n warrants and attach a striping plan. d. Vehicle Storage/ cuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50 % 95 % Existin Conditions Ye r of Opening ive Years Beyond Change of Land Use 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 139 i 5.1.a I APPENDIX " Page 3 of 4 e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants). f. Summarize local accident history3 (only required for access to principal and minor 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic wi/thy.4 a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two inc ding turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by t b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, includinovements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, includinovements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without proje d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source. 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and att supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentat' n for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour t ps. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculation . LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Chan7Af Land Use With Project Without Project to standard analysis default values and justifications. 'olice Department 4 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 140 APPENDIX B Page 4 of 4 I 5.1.a I 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific tra/inECDC cts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the attached Impact Fee Rate Tables andied in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculatio 18.82.130. ❑ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior a was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. ITE Land Use Category Per Unit Fee Rate New Use $ Prior Use $ New Use Fee: $ - ❑ NEW DEVELOPMENT ITE Land Use New Use ❑ OTHER 11#f is in e feet, Fee welling, etc. X — $ se Fee: $ Units in Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, vfp, etc. $ X MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: INDEPE DENT FEE CALCULATION: $240.00 + consultant fee $ TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE $ City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date 5 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 141 5.1.a 2017-2019 - Impact Fee Rate Table Fee 2017 2018 (w/ 4,036.61 2019 and beyond ITE Land Use Code - Description Calculation (w/ $2,543.01 cost per (w/ $5,530.21 cost per trip) tri cost per trip) 110 - Light Industrial per sq. foot $3.64 $5.77 $7.91 140 - Manufacturing per sq. foot $2.72 $4.32 $5.92 151 - Mini -warehouse per sq. foot $0.97 $1.54 $2.10 210 - Single-family house per dwelling unit $2 873.60 $4,561.37 $6,249.14 220 - Apartment per dwelling unit $1,881.83 $2,987.09 $4,092.36 230 - Condominium per dwelling uni240 $1,525.81 $2,421.97 $3,318.13 - Mobile home per duet ling $1,627.53 $2,583.43 $3,539.33 251 - Senior Housing per dwelling $584.89 $928.42 $1,271.95 unit 320 - Motel per room $1,525.81 $2,421.97 $3,318.13 420 - Marina per boat berth $457.74 $726.59 $995.44 444 - Movie theater per screens $31,905.90 $50,645.37 $69,384.85 492 - Health/fitness club per sq. foot $6.74 $10.98 $14.66 530 - High school per sq. foot $1.98 $3.15 $4.31 560 - Church per sq. foot $1.68 $2.67 $3.65 565 - Day care center per sq. foot $15.77 $25.02 $34.29 620 - Nursing home per bed $483.17 $766.96 $1,050.74 710 - General office per sq. foot $5.01 $7.95 $10.89 720 - Medical office per sq. foot $9.54 $15.14 $20.74 820 - Shopping center per sq. foot $3.26 $5.17 $7.08 826 - Specialty retail per sq. foot $2.06 $3.27 $4.48 850 - Supermarket per sq. foot $10.50 $16.84 $22.84 850 - Convenience market 15-16hrs per sq. foot $14.07 $22.38 $30.58 912 - Drive-in bank per sq. foot $15.97 $25.41 $34.73 932 - Restaurant: sit-down per sq. foot $10.04 $15.95 $21.84 933 - Fast food, no drive -up per sq. foot $22.28 $35.36 $48.44 934 - Fast food with drive -up per sq. foot $26.24 $41.66 $57.07 936 - Coffee/donut shop, no drive- per sq. foot $13.88 $22.04 $30.19 UP 938 - Coffee/donut shop, drive -up, per sq. foot $25.56 $40.37 $55.58 no indoor seating per vehicle 945 - Gas station with convenience fueling $6,916.99 $10,979.58 $15,042.18 position EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 7.91 x 3,936 31,133.76 10.89 x 5,60 60,994.89 4.48 x 2,245 10,057.60 Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 142 5.1.a 2009 - Impact Fee Rate Table Edrnorrds ,Stree Is and J?Oods Impact Fee Rote Study TABLE 4 IMPACT FEE PATH (1) (2) 0) (4) (5) I fig) Trip ITE ITE Land tlse Trip % New Length Net New Trips per Impact Fee Per Emit @ Code Cat Rate' Trips' Factor Unit of Leasure $1 049,41 perTri 110 Light lriduwial 0.97 100% 1,47 1,43 1.000 sq ft 130 per square Foot 140 Manufacturing 0.73 100% 1.47 1.07 1.000 sq ft. 1.12 per square Foot 151 Minirwarchou;a 0.26 100% 1,47 0,38 1.000 sq ft 0.40 per square foot 210 Single family House 1.01 100% 1,13 1,14 dwelling 1,196.33 per dwelling unit 220 Apartment 0.62 100% 1 1,20 0,74 dwelling 776.56 per dwelling unit 230 rondominium 0.52 100% 1,15 0,60 dwelling 629.65 per dwelling unit 240 Mobile Home 0.59 100% 1.09 0.54 dwelling 671.62 per dwelling unit 251 Senior Housing 0.16 100% 0.93 0,15 dwelling 157.41 per dwelling unit 320 Motel 0.47 100% 1.27 0,50 room 629.55 per room 420 Marina 0.19 100% 0,97 0.18 berth 188.89 per Boat keirth 444 Movie Theater 3.80 85% 0,73 L36 1,000 sel Ft 2.40 per square foot 492 Health/I'itnesClub 3-53: 75% 1,00 2.65 1,000 Sq Ft 2,75 per s !c q f t 530 High Schaal D.q r F50% 1,00 0,78 1,000 sq ft 0,82 per square foot 560 Church 0.5.E f 001A 1.20 046 1,000 sq Ft 0,69 per square foot 565 Day Care Center 12.46 ` (°)3il 0.67 6,26 1,000 Sol ft 6,57 pers are foot 620 Nursing Herne 0.221 1003N 0,87 0.19 bed 199.39 per bed 710 General Office 1.49 903� 1 A7 1.97 1,000 sq ft 2.()7 por sq ara foot 720 Medical Office 3.45 7.5�h. 1.40 �_33L s;.G0 3.63 1,000 &q ft 3,81 per s are foul 814 Specialtynctail 2.71 0.89 1,000sgFt 0,93 per square foot 820 Shopping Center 3.73 6S3h ?;.:;:3 1.28 1,000 s!j "t 1,34 per square F t 850 Supermarket 10.50 65 . :;..Er7 40% 0-40 4.57 1 000 f,q =.t. 4.80 per square foot 852 Conveniance mkt 34.57 5.53 1,0Co sq -t 5-80 per square foot 15-16 hours 912 Drive-in Bank 25.82 55% 0.17 6.67 1,000 sq -t 7.CO per Square foot 932 Restaurant, sit- 11.15 55% 0.73 4.43 1,0C30 ;q =t 4.'l0 persquare foDt down 26.1 S SO% 0,67 9.39 per square foot 933 Fast food. rna 8.76 1,000 sq ft drive -up 934 Fast food, w! 33,84 51% 0,62 10.70 1,000 Sq ft 11,23 per square foot drive -up 936 Coffee/oonu� 40,75 20% 0.67 5.46 1,000 sq ft 5,73 per square foot %O , rio drive-L 938 Coffee/Donut 7S.00 20% Q.67 10.05 1,400 sq ft M0 5 per square foot Shop, drrva-up, ro indoor seating 945 Gas station 1 3.3F 45% 0-53 3.19 vfp 3,347.62 per vfp' w/convenience 2ITE Trip Genc-iti:)n 'Pth Fd-ion}; 4-6 PM Pack HourTrlp Ends 3 Excludes puss-bv ii;l3s; see: `Trip eneraflon Handbcyok; An ITE Proposed Recommended Procllce" (1988) 1114:1tio to pvn: ogr. -r p lengtr. vfp: vehlcle .,A"';ig pAtior1 HertClgMON �,91yofEdmands. Washington Young & October 29r 2009 company EFFECTIVE 5/1/2010 Rage 21 Attachment 5 Packet Pg. 143 5.1.a 2004 - Impact Fee Rate E<Ymotids rtoad;mpacI i-oo tote study TABLE 4 IMPACT FEE RATES (1) (2) (3} (4) (5) (6} Trip ITE ITE Land Ilse Trip % New Length Net New Tops per Impact[ Fee Per Unit @ $ Cade Cat o Rates Tri s5 Factor' Unit of Measure 763.66 per Trip 110 Light Industrial 0.98 100% 1 ,Sn 1,56 1,000 sq ft 1.10 per square foot 140 Manufacturing 0.74 100°% 1.59 1,15 LWO sq ft 0.90 per square foot 151 Minit-warehouse 0.26 100% 1.59 0.41 1 000 sq ft 0,32 r square foot 210 Single family 1,01 100% 1.09 1.10 dwelling 840.72 per dwelling unit House 220 Apartment 0.62 100% 1.15 0.71 dwelling 544.49 per dwelling unit 230 Condominium 0.54 100% 1.1 5 0.62 dwelNn 474_24 r dwelling unit 240 Mobile Home 0.56 100% 1.09 0.61 dwelling 466.14 per dwelling unit 310 Hotel 0,61 100% 1,25 0,76 room 58229 per morn 320 Motel O) 47 100% 1.25 0.59 room 448.65 per room 420 Marina 0,19 100% 0-97 0.18 berth 140.74 per boat berth 430 Golf course 0.30 100% 1.00 0.30 acre 229.10 Ter acre 444 MoAe Theater 3.80 100% 0.72 2,74 1,000 sq ft 1.36 er square foot 492 Racquet club 1.83 100% O.97 1.75 1 r000 sq ft 3.58 Fer square foot 930 High School 1.02 1001A 0,62 0.63 1,OOO sq ft 0.48 per square foot EGO Church 0,65 100% 1 A 5 0,76 1,000 Sq ft 0.58 per square foot 610 Hospital 0.92 100% 1.56 1.44 1,000 sq ft 1.10 per square foot 620 Nursing home 0-20 10OW& 0-a7 0,17 bed 132,68 per bed 710 General Office 1.49 100% 1.59 2,37 1 000Eq ft 1.81 per square font 720 M&cical office 3,66 1000A 1.50 5.49 1,000 sq ft 4,19 per square foot 820 Sho aping Center 3.74 81 % 0.40 1.21 1,000 sq ft 1 0.93 per square foot 83 2 RpstEiurant, 91t- 10,86 56% 1-06 6,45 1.000 5C1 ft 4,92 per square feet dcN%n a33 Fast food, no 26.15 52% 0.62 8.43 1,000 sq ft 6-44 per square foot drive -up 834 Fast food, w/ 33,48 51 % 0,62 10.59 1,000 sq Ft 8.05 per square foot drive -up 8A4 Gas station 14.56 609do 0.53 4-63 purnp 3 535.82 per of 045 Gas station 13.381 47% 0.53 3,33 purnp 2,545,26 per vfps w/convenience 550 Supermarket 11,51 55% 0.65 4.11 1,000 sq ft 3.14 per square foot 851 CDnvenience 53.73 39% 0,40 8.38 1,000 sq ft. 6.40 per square foot market-24 hr 912 Drke+i Bank 1 54.77 L 51% 0.47 13A 3 1,000 sq ft 10.03 per square foot ITE Trip Genefmticn (6th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Haar Trlp Ends a Excludes pass -by frll - see "Trip Genefafion HctndbookE An ITE Pfoposed Recommended Praclice- o9aa) 4 Rolia to avemga trip length. 5 vfp: vet•Icle fueling poslrlon Hend'efsor1, CIty of Edmand& Wostiloglorl Younf, & Aprrll 15, 2003 Corflpony Pale 15 EFFECTIVE 9/12/2004 Attachment 5 1Packet Pg. 144 5.1.a Technical Memorandum TO: Shawn Rafferty FROM: Steven Quarterman JUN 2 8 2017 DATE: June 21, 2017 01-VELOPMENT : RE: Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment COUNT Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Property Edmonds, Washington Project No. 1527002.010.012 Introduction The Port of Edmonds (Port) wishes to develop the vacant lots located on Snohomish County Parcel No. 27032300415800 at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington (subject property) for retail purposes. The Port's pre -application consultation with the City of Edmonds (City) resulted in Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report #CRA19940162 (City of Edmonds 2013), which documents the subject property's proximity to critical areas, including a seismic hazard area, wetland, and stream. The City requires completion of a critical areas report(s) that satisfies the criteria set forth in the City of Edmonds' Community Development Code (ECDC), which references minimum report requirements and additional requirements specific to the type of critical area(s) affected. Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI), under contract to Jackson Main Architecture, conducted a site reconnaissance to help the Port determine the approximate location of wetlands, waterways, and/or buffers that may be regulated by local, state, and/or federal agencies. Additionally, LAI evaluated critical areas compliance in accordance with ECDC Title 23. Our evaluation was limited to accessible areas within the subject property. Presence of wetland/waterway habitat extending beyond the subject property and within 200 feet (ft; i.e., the study area) was estimated by visual assessment and with the use of public domain resources. This technical memorandum identifies the presence of wetlands/waterways in the study area, documents buffer conditions in the vicinity of the subject property, and evaluates these critical areas in relation to the subject property. Assessment of seismic hazard areas will be documented in a separate report prepared by LAI. Background Information Review Consistent with Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report #CRA19940162, the City of Edmonds' Critical Areas Mapping identifies portions of Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh outside of the subject property, but within the study area (Figure 1). As mapped, the approximately 21-acre marsh is identified by the City as a Category 1 wetland, a shoreline regulated under the Shoreline Management Act, and state priority habitat. In accordance l LANDAU J t ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 778-0907 Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 145 5.1.a Landau Associates with ECDC Chapter 23.50.040, Category 1 wetlands are prescribed a standard buffer between 75 ft and 225 ft, depending on their wetland rating habitat score and applicable special characteristics (e.g., estuarine wetlands, bogs, etc). Edmonds Marsh is primarily freshwater wetland with a small area of saltmarsh along its western edge (City of Edmonds 2007). As described in the City of Edmonds' Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Inventory and Characterization (City of Edmonds 2007), the downstream area of Edmonds Marsh includes a channelized section of Willow Creek. As it approaches the culvert under the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad, which runs along the western edge of Edmonds Marsh, the channel is characterized as a ditch with a bottom composed entirely of silt. The ditch is connected to a culvert and discharges into the subtidal zone off Marina Beach Park. Hydrology of Edmonds Marsh is supported, in part, by Shellabarger Creek, Willow Creek, and fluctuations of tidal elevations. The Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife's interactive map PHS (Priority Habitats and Species) on the Web (WDFW 2017) identifies occurrence/migration of resident cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) and coho salmon (O. kisutch). As a result, Willow Creek is classified as a Type F stream in accordance with ECDC Chapter 23.90.010. The ECDC further expands classification of Type F streams to include "anadromous fish -bearing streams adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access," "anadromous fish -bearing streams adjacent to reaches without anadromous fish access," and "non- anadromous fish -bearing streams." ECDC Chapter 23.90.040.1) prescribes a standard buffer of 100 ft for Type F anadromous fish -bearing streams adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access. Floodplain associated with Puget Sound is mapped along portions of the subject property's western boundary (Figure 1). Summary of Existing Conditions LAI biologist Steven Quarterman conducted a site reconnaissance on June 14, 2017. The weather during the site reconnaissance was overcast. The subject property is developed with a commercial building (Jacobson's Marine) and asphalt and gravel parking (Attachment 1). The subject property is bordered by Admiral Way, West Dayton Street, and BNSF railroad. Adjacent to but outside of the project area, a segment of Willow Creek was observed flowing west between culverts associated with the railroad and Admiral Way (Figure 1). This section of creek is bordered by existing impervious surfaces. The view of Edmonds Marsh/Willow Creek from the subject property is obscured by perimeter fencing and the BNSF railroad, but they can be observed from a viewing platform adjacent to Harbor Square (Figure 1). Edmonds Marsh appears to extend to the base of fill associated with the BNSF railroad, and Willow Creek appears to be channelized parallel to the BNSF right-of-way. Vegetation observed in Edmonds Marsh includes, but is not limited to, cattail (Typha latifolia), bulrush Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment Port of Edmonds Retail Property 2 June 21, 2017 Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 146 Landau Associates 5.1.a (Schoenoplectus acutus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus), and curly dock (Rumex crispus). Critical Areas Compliance Evaluation ECDC 23.40.220 (C.4) identifies development proposals within interrupted stream or wetland buffers as allowed activities, in which: Adjacent areas that may be physically separated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established structures or paved areas may be exempted from the prescribed buffer widths if proven scientifically to be functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. The director will require the applicant to provide a site assessment and functional analysis documentation report by a qualified critical area consultant that demonstrates the interrupted buffer area is functionally isolated. The director shall consider the hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection potential and the extent and permanence of the physical separation. The ECDC also identifies a buffer as "a designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem." Given the existing BNSF railroad right-of-way and impervious surfaces on the subject property, the functional buffer of Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh does not extend onto the subject property, and any buffer areas overlapping the subject property are effectively separated from the Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh and not an integral part of the stream and wetland (i.e., have no influence on habitat or water quality). Any proposed development on the subject property will be located within the footprint of the existing development (i.e., within an area covered by asphalt and/or gravel). As a result, the proposed development will be located in an area of interrupted wetland and stream buffer and will not result in impacts to the functional buffer associated with Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh. This technical memorandum was prepared for the use of Jackson Main Architecture, the Port of Edmonds, and the City of Edmonds. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of LAI. Furthermore, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other project, without review and authorization by LAI, shall be at the user's sole risk. Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment Port of Edmonds Retail Property Attachment 6 June 21, 2017 Packet Pg. 147 5.1.a Landau Associates We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Jackson Main Architecture and the Port of Edmonds. If you have questions or if we may be of further assistance, please contact the undersigned at (425) 329-0321. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven Quarterman Senior Associate SJQ/mcs [P.\1527\002\R\WETLAND-WATERWAYS CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT\WE n AND -WATERWAY CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT.00CX] References City of Edmonds. 2017. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code: A Codification of the General Ordinances of the City of Edmonds, Washington. Current through Ordinance 4069, passed May 16, 2017. City of Edmonds. 2013. Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report; CRA19940162. December 16. City of Edmonds. 2007. Shoreline Master Program Update: Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. November. WDFW. 2017. PHS on the Web. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Priority Habitats and Species Program. http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/ Attachments: Figure 1. Study Area Map Attachment 1. Selected Site Photographs Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment Port of Edmonds Retail Property 4 June 21, 2017 Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 148 0 150 300 Scale In Feet 0 V c 0 E w 4- 0 1: 0 a N T O O N O N Z J a r c m E s a 3 1= 0 0. m oc CO N T O O T N O N Z J Note +� 1. Black and white reproduction ofthis cc original may reduce its effectiveness an lead to incorrect interpretation. t Figur R Area Map 1 a Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 149 5.1.a ATTACH M ENT Selected Site Photograph; a� C M 3 m C O L r N .s a N C O E W 4- 0 r- O d N O O N O N Z J d N C d E t V R r r Q t r 3 O Q. 4 4- m r U) N T- O O N O N Z J d C N E t V O r r Q Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 150 1. Gravel parking at north end of subject property. 2. Paved parking at south end of subject property. Port of Edmonds Retail LANDAU Property ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Selected Site Photographs 5.1.a Figure A-1 Attachment 6 1Packet Pg. 151 3. Daylight section of Willow Creek adjacent to south end of subject property. 4. Edmonds Marsh adjacent to the subject property from viewing platform. Port of Edmonds Retail LANDAU Property ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Selected Site Photographs 5.1.a Figure A-2 Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 152 5.1.a Draft Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development Edmonds, Washington June 22, 2017 Prepared for Port of Edmonds Edmonds, Washington LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425)778-0907 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 153 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Description.............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Scope of Services................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 General Geologic Conditions..............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Surface Conditions..............................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions.................................................................................................2-1 2.4 Groundwater Conditions....................................................................................................2-1 3.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Site Classification and Seismic Design Parameters............................................................3-1 3.2 Liquefaction Potential........................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Liquefaction -Induced Settlement.......................................................................................3-2 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................4-1 5.0 DESIGN -LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS.........................................................................................................................5-1 6.0 USE OF THIS REPORT......................................................................................................................6-1 7.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................7-1 Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 i Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 154 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates FIGURES Figure Title Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Critical Areas Map, Seismic Hazard Areas Appendix Title A Field Explorations B Laboratory Soil Testing Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development APPENDICES 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 155 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates This page intentionally left blank. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 iii Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 156 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a critical areas assessment related to geologically hazardous areas that Landau Associates' (LAI) conducted for the Port of Edmonds (Port) proposed Marine Retail Development project in Edmonds, Washington. The general project location is shown on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1). A base map of a portion of the project site and the location of our subsurface exploration are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the seismic hazard area in the vicinity of the project site. This report has been prepared based on LAI's discussions with Jackson Main Architecture (Jackson Main) and the Port; a conceptual site plan provided by Jackson Main; data collected during our field exploration and laboratory testing programs; our familiarity with geologic conditions within the vicinity of the project site; and our experience on similar projects. 1.1 Project Description We understand that the Port would like to develop the vacant lots located at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 on Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington for retail purposes. As detailed in the City of Edmonds Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report No. CRA19940162, the project site has been determined to contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a seismic hazard area, wetland, and stream. The City is requiring critical areas reports to satisfy the requirements outlined in the City of Edmonds Community Development Code, which references minimum report requirements and additional requirements specific to the type of critical area affected. This report addresses geologically hazardous areas; the other critical areas (i.e., wetland and stream) are addressed by LAI in a separate document. 1.2 Scope of Services Jackson Main retained LAI to provide critical areas services to support design of the proposed retail development. Our services were provided in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our proposal dated May 23, 2017. Written authorization to proceed was provided by Shawn Rafferty of Jackson Main on May 24, 2017. This report addresses Task 1, as described in our proposal and is intended to satisfy the geotechnical requirements of Section 23.40.090.D and related sections of the City of Edmonds Community Development Code. Our scope of services for Task 1 includes the following specific tasks: • Reviewing readily available published geologic maps, geotechnical reports, and drawings for the project area • Preparing a geotechnical work plan • Completing a geologic reconnaissance to collect information on the general nature and physical features of the project area • Obtaining utility clearances prior to performing a field exploration program Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 1-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 157 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates • Advancing one exploratory boring to characterize the nature of the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the project site • Collecting representative soil samples from the exploratory boring at selected depth intervals • Logging the exploratory boring and recording pertinent information, including soil sample depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics, and groundwater occurrence • Conducting Atterberg Limits determinations and grain size distribution analyses on samples obtained from the exploratory boring • Performing geotechnical engineering analyses and evaluating data derived from the subsurface investigation and laboratory testing programs • Preparing and submitting this written critical areas report summarizing the results of our findings, conclusions, and preliminary recommendations for the project. This report includes: — a site plan showing the location of the boring completed for this project — a site plan showing the seismic hazard critical areas — results of laboratory testing and a log of the exploratory boring — a discussion of the near -surface soil and groundwater conditions observed at the project site — a discussion of geologically hazardous areas on the site and geologically hazardous areas off site potentially impacted by the proposed project — an evaluation of the physical properties of the subsurface soils, including the thickness of unconsolidated deposits and an approximate factor of safety against liquefaction — a discussion of the potential impacts of seismic activity on the site — preliminary recommendations for mitigating the liquefaction hazard at the project site. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 1-2 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 158 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS This section discusses the general geologic setting of the project area and describes the surface and subsurface conditions observed at the project site at the time of our field investigation. Interpretations of the site conditions are based on the results of our review of available information, and the results of our site reconnaissance, subsurface investigation, and laboratory testing. 2.1 General Geologic Conditions General geologic information for the project area was obtained from the Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington (Minard 1983), published by the US Geological Survey. According to this source, the project area is underlain by modified land. Soil defined as modified land is typically highly variable and often consists of unconsolidated sands, silty sands, and gravels that can contain debris. 2.2 Surface Conditions The project site, which is located at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 on Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington, is bordered by Admiral Way, West Dayton Street, and BNSF Railroad. The project site is generally level with little to no vegetation. The site also houses stockpiles of bark mulch and other soils. Structures in the vicinity of the project site include marina facilities, restaurants, and commercial retail spaces, and development within the project area consists of a mixture of commercial and light industrial uses. 2.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions Subsurface conditions at the project site were explored by advancing and sampling one exploratory boring (B-1) on June 8, 2017. The exploratory boring was advanced to a depth of about 26.5 ft below the ground surface (bgs) in an area of potential future development. The approximate location of the boring is shown on Figure 2. A discussion of field exploration procedures, together with an edited log of the exploratory boring, is presented in Appendix A. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. At the location explored, subsurface conditions at the project site were observed to consist of about 7 ft of medium dense to dense sand that is underlain by approximately 5 ft of very soft to soft silt with organics, which is underlain by dense to very dense sand with gravel. Boring B-1 did not extend beyond the bottom of the dense to very dense sand with gravel. 2.4 Groundwater Conditions At the time of our field investigation in early June 2017, groundwater was observed at a depth of about 9 ft bgs in boring B-1. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 2-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 159 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates It should be noted that the groundwater conditions reported herein are for the specific location and date indicated, and therefore, may not necessarily be indicative of other locations and/or times. Furthermore, it is anticipated that groundwater conditions at the project site will vary depending on local subsurface conditions, the weather, tidal influences, and other factors. It is likely that the highest groundwater levels will occur in the winter/spring months. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 2-2 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 160 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates 3.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The Pacific Northwest is seismically active and the project site could be subject to ground shaking from a moderate to major earthquake. Consequently, moderate levels of earthquake shaking should be anticipated during the design life of the project, and the proposed improvements should be designed to resist earthquake loading using appropriate design methodology. 3.1 Site Classification and Seismic Design Parameters Seismic site class is used to estimate ground motion at a site during a design earthquake and dictates the level of design effort with respect to seismic design. Given the presence of liquefiable soil at the project site (see Section 3.2), the project site could be interpreted as site class F. However, assuming the future structure's fundamental period of vibration is less than 0.5 seconds, the 2015 IBC and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7) allow for estimation of site class using conventional methods [i.e., shear wave velocity or Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value profiles]. For this site, the SPT N-value profile results in a site class C. The seismic design parameters presented in Table 1 were obtained from the US Geological Survey's (USGS) seismic design maps for the IBC/ASCE 7 2,475-year (2 percent in 50-year exceedance probability) design earthquake and site class C. The design earthquake moment magnitude (M) was determined by selecting the earthquake magnitude with the largest hazard contribution as shown in the seismic hazard deaggregation performed by USGS. Table 1. Seismic Design Parameters Site Class M PGA (g) SS (g) Sl (g) Fa F FPGA TL (s) C 7.11 0.513 1.267 0.497 1.000 1.303 1.000 6 a Fa, Fv = acceleration (0.2-second period) and velocity (1.0-second period) site coefficients, respectively. b FPGA = peak ground acceleration coefficient. c M = design earthquake moment magnitude. d PGA = peak ground acceleration. e S5, S1= 0.2-second and 1.0-second period spectral accelerations, respectively. f TL = long period transition. 3.2 Liquefaction Potential As detailed in the City of Edmonds Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report No. CRA19940162, the project site has been determined to contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a Seismic Hazard Area. Based on our observations and the information provided in the above referenced Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report, the Seismic Hazard for the project site has been determined to be soil liquefaction. Liquefaction is defined as a significant rise in pore water pressure within a soil mass caused by earthquake -induced cyclic shaking. The shear strength of liquefiable soil is reduced during large and/or long -duration earthquakes as the soil consistency approaches that of a semi -solid slurry, which Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 3-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 161 5.1.a DRAFT Landau Associates can result in significant and widespread structural damage if not properly mitigated. Deposits of loose, granular soil below the water table are most susceptible to liquefaction, although non -plastic and low -plasticity cohesive soils may also be susceptible to liquefaction. The first step in liquefaction analysis is to identify the susceptibility of the soils to liquefaction; for example, some soils may be too plastic to undergo liquefaction, or groundwater may not be present. The liquefaction susceptibility at this site was evaluated by identifying liquefaction -prone soils (soft to medium stiff, low plasticity silts and loose to medium dense sands and silty sands) and the presence of groundwater. For liquefaction analysis, groundwater was assumed to be 6 ft bgs. The liquefaction susceptibility of the silt unit at the project site was evaluated using the criterion presented by Bray and Sancio (2006).1 The results of our liquefaction susceptibility analysis suggest that the majority of the silt unit at the project site is susceptible to liquefaction. For soil units identified as susceptible to liquefaction, preliminary liquefaction analyses were conducted according to the Simplified Procedure (Idriss and Boulanger 2008) to identify the factor of safety against liquefaction. The Simplified Procedure uses an empirical correlation between the SPT blow count corrected for overburden pressure and fines content (the clean sand condition), (N1)60-cs, and the soil resistance to liquefaction. Our preliminary analyses indicate that the soil encountered within Boring B-1 between the depths of 5 and 12.5 ft BGS is liquefiable with an approximate average Factor of Safety (FS) against liquefaction of 0.5. Liquefaction at the project site could result in post -liquefaction settlement, as discussed below. 3.3 Liquefaction -Induced Settlement Liquefaction likely will result in ground surface settlement. The amount of liquefaction -induced ground settlement during and following the design seismic event was estimated using empirical methods developed by Tokimatsu and Seed (1987), Ishihara and Yoshimine (1992), and Idriss and Boulanger (2008). These estimates address only settlement caused by liquefaction -induced soil reconsolidation, and estimates reflect free -field settlement. Soil —structure interaction between foundations and liquefiable soils could cause additional seismically induced settlement. In our opinion, a sufficient thickness of soil is present above the water table so as to preclude the potential for shallow foundation failure due to liquefaction. However, this situation could lead to localized zones of liquefaction during the design earthquake, which could result in differential ground settlement. Our analyses indicate an estimated magnitude of differential ground settlement of approximately 3 inches if no ground improvement efforts are made. The actual magnitude and extent i Bray and Sancio (2006) state that cohesive soils are susceptible to liquefaction if the water content to liquid limit ratio is 0.85 or more and the soil has a plasticity index (PI) <12. Additionally, clayey silts and silty clays of moderate plasticity (12<PI<18) can undergo liquefaction when shaken intensely for a significant number of loading cycles. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report 1527002.010.011 Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development June 22, 2017 3-2 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 162 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates of the settlement will depend on many factors, including the duration and intensity of ground shaking during the seismic event and local soil and groundwater conditions. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 3-2 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 163 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon evaluation of the data collected during this assessment, it is our opinion that the liquefaction hazard at the project site will need to be mitigated in order to reduce the preexisting level of risk to the site and all other properties potentially impacted on a long-term basis. Furthermore, based on our observations and preliminary analyses, it is our opinion that the project could be designed so that the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than predevelopment conditions. Possible options for mitigating the liquefaction hazard at the project site include: • Shallow Foundations: Structures at the site may be constructed on shallow foundations and no ground improvement, assuming the structure is designed to accommodate the estimated seismically induced settlement, in addition to any anticipated static settlements due to construction and building loads. From a geotechnical perspective, this is likely the most economical mitigation approach. • Excavate and Replace/Shallow Foundations: Structures at the site could be constructed on shallow foundations with overexcavation and replacement of the unconsolidated deposits. Removing and replacing the unconsolidated deposits with compacted structural fill to the full depth of 12 ft bgs would eliminate the risk of seismically induced settlement, however would require challenging deep excavations. Due to the presence of unconsolidated sands and a relatively shallow groundwater table, these deep excavations would likely require the use of elaborate shoring and dewatering systems. This option is likely to be less economical due to the need for extensive shoring and dewatering in order to fully remove the unconsolidated deposits. Ground Improvement: Structures at the site could be constructed on improved ground. Soil could be improved by either mixing material with soil in situ (such as with deep soil mixing) or by placing material in bored holes (such as with rammed -aggregate piers) to create relatively strong and stiff vertical elements. These options are likely to be moderate cost, however will significantly reduce seismically induced settlements, as well as reduce settlements due to building loads. Deep Foundations: Structures at the site could be constructed on deep foundations consisting of driven or drilled elements. These elements could be unreinforced or reinforced grout columns or auger -cast piles, or driven piles. This is likely the least economical mitigation approach. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 4-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 164 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 5.0 DESIGN -LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS We recommend that LAI be retained to develop design -level recommendations in support of the retail development, as well as review the geotechnical-related portions of the project plans and specifications to determine if they are consistent with the recommendations presented in this and subsequent reports. We also recommend that monitoring, testing, and consultation be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by our explorations, to provide recommendations should conditions be revealed during construction that differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether geotechnicaI-related construction activities comply with project plans/specifications and the recommendations contained in this and subsequent reports. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 5-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 165 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 6.0 USE OF THIS REPORT LAI prepared this report for the exclusive use of Jackson Main Architects and the Port of Edmonds for specific application to proposed Marine Retail Development project in Edmonds, Washington. This report is not intended to be sufficient for final design; however, the information in this report could be supplemented with additional explorations and engineering analyses which could form the basis of the design -phase geotechnical recommendations. Use of this report by others or for another project is at the user's sole risk. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been conducted in accordance with generally accepted practices of the geotechnical engineering profession; no other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. The preliminary conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the subsurface data obtained from the exploration completed for this study. Additional explorations should be completed at the time of final design. There may be some variation in subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the project site, and the nature and extent of the variations may not become evident until construction. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services on this project and look forward to assisting you during the design phase of the project. If you have any questions or comments regarding the information contained in this report, or if we may be of further service, please call. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 6-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 166 DRAFT 5.1.a Landau Associates 7.0 REFERENCES Minard, J.P. 1983. Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington U.S. Geological Survey. Geotechnical Critical Areas Report Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Development 1527002.010.011 June 22, 2017 7-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 167 Puget Sound ■ Project Location f { 0 0.5 1 Miles Data Source: Esri 2012 A k m V a E 0 � Puget Dr 524 Caspers St ? Z � a 'r M f � I - Main St C Edmonds Marine Retail LANDAU Development Vicinity Map ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Attachment 7 �a 220th St SW a a Seattle Spokane Tacoma Hympia Washington Figure 1 Packet Pg. 168 Landau Associates I G:\I CH �15ti� RIM=12.32 6" DI NW IE=9.32 \F02 Site Plan.dwg 1 6/19/2017 3:12 PM RIM=11.34 6"PVC ENE IE.94 P T�A�ISTRANS GAS II II \ 3 ---12— So � o RIM=1 1.E _ s5 r SS SS SS SS SS Ss S— _ ss ss ss ss---�--�u+ - — --4e4►irs— — — — _ 12 CONC_ W W N W W —W'— W. W W 4l 2, 8' SWINGING GAT S 4,� 16"sin :.:.: :.: •: b': 20' )�O NG GATE I 5' HAINLINK FENCE W/ BARBWIRE ss RECYCLE OUTDOOR DISPL PININ"010 d I �% % %������� /////////,%/%i%///�%///%////.'//////.///�� MOM,�/i <� SITE i 20,680 SF \ 0.48 ACRES 14 C C 6 S 5 S S S 5 • 8.k185' 8.k 8.k16.5' 8. .5' x18.5' a.ktfi.6 8.'x16.5' 8.'x185' 85x16.5' 05'xi65' BSki6.5' . k .' 85xi6.5 8.5ki6.' B.Ski6 8.5k1 5' 8.5'x1 R 6' CHAINLINK Legend B-1 S Boring location and designation 0 40 80 LANDAU Scale in Feet ASSOCIATES ABOVE GROUND POWERLINEBOVE GROUND POWERLINE Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Base Map Source: Jackson Main Architecture, 2017 T Edmonds Marine Retail Development Site and Exploration Plan Edmonds, Washington Attach—m-e—ff Figure 2 Packet Pg. 169 4 k-f 1 • � Admiral Ways -6NSF oo v ia oP\N18R\:' 40 38 30 3? 7 Legend Q Overall Parcel Subject Parcel of this Report (See Figure 2) Seismic Hazard Areas Contours 0 LANDAU ASSOCIATES r; Data Sources: City of Edmonds GIS 0 150 300 Edmonds Marine Retail Development Scale in Feet Edmonds, Washington o�- i� tiIlk- Note 1. Black and white reproduction of this color original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. Critical Areas Map Figure Seismic Hazard Areas 3 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 170 5.1.a APPENDIX P Field Explorations a� C M .3 m C 0 N .S a 0 C O E W 4- 0 r- 0 d N O O N O N Z J d N C d E t V R r r Q t r 3 0 Q. 4 4- m 0 r U) N T- O O N O N Z J d C N t V r r Q Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 171 5.1.a DRAFT APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on June 8, 2017. The exploration program consisted of advancing one exploratory boring at the approximate location illustrated on Figure 2 of this report. The boring was advanced to a depth of approximately 26.5 ft below the existing ground surface (BGS) using the hollow -stem auger drilling technique. Holocene Drilling, Inc. of Puyallup, Washington advanced the boring under subcontract to Landau Associates. The location of the exploratory boring was located approximately in the field by measuring distances to nearby features. The ground surface elevation at the exploration location was not determined. The field exploration program was coordinated and monitored by Landau Associates personnel who also obtained representative soil samples, maintained a detailed record of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, and described the soil encountered by visual and textural examination. Each representative soil type observed in our exploratory boring was described using the soil classification system shown on Figure A-1, in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D 2488, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure). A log of the exploratory boring is presented on Figure A-2. This log represents our interpretation of subsurface conditions identified during the field exploration program. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the summary log represents the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are only for the specific date and location reported and, therefore, are not necessarily representative of other locations and times. A further discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions observed is contained in the text portion of this report. Disturbed samples of the soil encountered in the exploratory boring were obtained at selected intervals using a 1.5-inch inside -diameter split -spoon sampler. The sampler was driven up to 18 inches into the undisturbed soil ahead of the drill bit with a 140-lb hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the final 12 inches of soil penetration, or part thereof, is noted on the boring log, adjacent to the appropriate sample notation. Samples collected in the manner were taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the borehole was decommissioned in general accordance with the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-160. A-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 172 5.1.a MAJOR DIVISIONS Soil Classification System uscs GRAPHIC LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL"' TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS (2)(3) GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVEL oo o:o..a.. GW Well -graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines N m .N GRAVELLY SOIL (Little or no fines) Poorly graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines o . o o 0 o GP GRAVEL WITH FINES GM o 16 m (More than 50% of Silty gravel; gravel/sand/silt mixture(s) Z E'y coarse fraction retained (Appreciable amount of ° Q o N on No. 4 sieve) fines) GC Clayey gravel; gravel/sand/clay mixture(s) CD Z SAND AND CLEAN SAND SW Well -graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines w c cn t r SANDY SOIL (Little or no fines) Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines SP ry SAND WITH FINES SPA Q 2!m O 02, (More than 50% of fraction Silty sand; sand/silt mixture(s) coarse passed (Appreciable amount of SC through No. 4 sieve) ) fines) Clayey sand; sand/clay mixture(s) PALsand Inor anic silt and very fine sand; rock flour; silty or clayey fine p o t �, SILT AND CLAY or clayey silt with slight plasticity CL N Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity; gravelly clay; sandy ID CD@ a) (Liquid limit less than 50) clay; silty clay; lean clay GL w ' E a', Z N y Organic silt; organic, silty clay of low plasticity N Q,L.Tp MH Inorganic silt; micaceous or diatomaceous fine sand m N o '_ SILT AND CLAY OF ` CO Z CH Inorganic clay of high plasticity; fat clay Z E LL (Liquid limit greater than 50) OH Organic clay of medium to high plasticity; organic silt HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL PT Peat; humus; swamp soil with high organic content GRAPHIC LETTER OTHER MATERIALS SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS PAVEMENT AC Or PC Asphalt concrete pavement or Portland cement pavement ROCK RK Rock (See Rock Classification) WOOD 7c, WD Wood, lumber, wood chips DEBRIS O DB Construction debris, garbage Notes: 1. USCS letter symbols correspond to symbols used by the Unified Soil Classification System and ASTM classification methods. Dual letter symbols (e.g., SP-SM for sand or gravel) indicate soil with an estimated 5-15% fines. Multiple letter symbols (e.g., ML/CL) indicate borderline or multiple soil classifications. 2. Soil descriptions are based on the general approach presented in the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure), outlined in ASTM D 2488. Where laboratory index testing has been conducted, soil classifications are based on the Standard Test Method for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, as outlined in ASTM D 2487. 3. Soil description terminology is based on visual estimates (in the absence of laboratory test data) of the percentages of each soil type and is defined as follows: Primary Constituent: > 50% - "GRAVEL," "SAND," "SILT," "CLAY," etc. Secondary Constituents: > 30% and < 50% - "very gravelly," "very sandy," "very silty," etc. > 15% and < 30% - "gravelly," "sandy," "silty," etc. Additional Constituents: > 5% and <_ 15% - "with gravel," "with sand," "with silt," etc. < 5% - "with trace gravel," "with trace sand," "with trace silt," etc., or not noted. 4. Soil density or consistency descriptions are based on judgement using a combination of sampler penetration blow counts, drilling or excavating conditions, field tests, and laboratory tests, as appropriate. Drilling and Sampling Key Field and Lab Test Data SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE NUMBER & INTERVAL Code Description Code Description a 3.25-inch O.D., 2.42-inch I.D. Split Spoon PP = 1.0 Pocket Penetrometer, tsf b 2.00-inch O.D., 1.50-inch I.D. Split Spoon Sample Identification Number TV = 0.5 Torvane, tsf c Shelby Tube PID = 100 Photoionization Detector VOC screening, ppm d Grab Sample Recovery Depth Interval W = 10 Moisture Content, % e Single -Tube Core Barrel 1 F Sample Depth Interval D = 120 Dry Density, pcf f Double -Tube Core Barrel -200 = 60 Material smaller than No. 200 sieve, % g 2.50-inch O.D., 2.00-inch I.D. WSDOT Portion of Sample Retained GS Grain Size - See separate figure for data h 3.00-inch O.D., 2.375-inch I.D. Mod. California for Archive or Analysis AL Atterberg Limits - See separate figure for data i Other - See text if applicable GT Other Geotechnical Testing 1 300-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop CA Chemical Analysis 2 140-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop Groundwater 3 Pushed 4 Vibrocore (Rotosonic/Geoprobe) :Z Approximate water level at time of drilling (ATD) 5 Other - See text if applicable 1 Approximate water level at time other than ATD Edmonds Marine Retail Figure 14 LANDAU Development Soil Classification System and Key /� �I ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington A_ I Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 173 5 10 15 20 25 30 B-1 SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE 75 Drilling Method: Hollow -Stem Auger 0 Zo ca t> E Ground Elevation (ft): Not Determined 3 o 2Z LL m U v .6 aa2 n � 0 a U w cn xs cn 100 c U) Logged By: SMG Date: 06/08/17 AC Asphalt Pavement (3 inch thickness) SP- (ASPHALT) SM Gray, gravelly SAND with silt (medium W = 9 dense, moist to wet) 1 b2 28 -200 = 6 (FILL) W=15 2b2 18 GS ML Gray -brown SILT with organics Q 3 b2 2 sand lense at 11.4 ft (very soft to soft, El moist to wet) (ALLUVIUM) 4 b2 3 W = 55 AL W = 16 SP Gray, fine to coarse SAND with gravel, 5 b2 34 -200 = 5 trace silt (dense to very dense, wet) (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 6b2 54 71 b2 83/ 9„ 811 b2 56 Boring Completed 06/08/17 Total Depth of Boring = 26.5 ft. 35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key" figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. I Edmonds Marine Retail 14 LANDAU Development Log of Boring B-1 ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Attachment 7 LAI Project No: 1527002.010 Moisture Content (%) Plastic Liquid Limit I�� Limit 20 40 60 80 A SPT N-Value A L Non -Standard N-Value � 20 40 60 80 X Fines Content (%) X 20 40 60 80 1 *A • A 81 9" ' R Figure A-2 Packet Pg. 174 5.1.a APPENDIX E Laboratory Soil Testing a� C M 3 m C O N .S a N C O E W 4- 0 r- O d N O O N O N Z J d N C d E t V R r r Q t r 3 O Q. 4 4- m r U) N T- O O N O N Z J d C N t V O r r Q Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 175 5.1.a DRAFT APPENDIX B LABORATORY SOIL TESTING Soil samples obtained from our exploratory boring were taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to characterize certain engineering and index properties of the soils at the project site. The laboratory testing program, which was performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) standard test procedures noted below, was limited to visual inspection to confirm our field soil descriptions, and determination of natural moisture content, certain Atterberg limits, and grain size distribution. A brief description of the testing performed is presented below. Natural Moisture Content The natural moisture contents of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory boring were determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 test procedures. The results from the moisture content determinations are indicated adjacent to the corresponding samples on the summary boring log presented in Appendix A. Atterberg Limit Analysis The Atterberg limits test was performed on a soil sample obtained from the exploratory boring in general accordance with ASTM D 4318 test procedures. The purpose of the test was to determine the liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of fine-grained soil sample. The sample selected for Atterberg limits test is designated with an "AL" in the column labeled "Test Data" on the summary boring log. Atterberg limits results are summarized on Figure B-1. Grain Size Analysis A sieve analysis was conducted on a selected soil sample obtained from the exploratory boring in general accordance with ASTM D422 test procedures. The sample selected for grain size analysis is designated with a "GS" in the column labeled "Test Data" on the summary boring log. The test results are presented in the form of a grain size distribution curve on Figure B-2. B-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 176 5.1.a a 60 50 40 20 10 0 ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS IC Exploration Sample Liquid lastic Plasticity Natural Unified Soil Symbol Number Number Depth Limit L' Index Moisture Soil Description Classification (ft) (%� (°o (%) (%) • B-1 S-4 10.0 43 27 16 55 Gray -brown SILT with organics MIL ASTM D 4318 Test Method Edmonds Marine Retail LANDAU Property ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Plasticity Chart Figure B-1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 177 5.1.a 1527002.01 6/19/17 N:\PROJECTS\1527002.010.GPJ GRAIN SIZE FIGURE STRAIGHT LINE 100 90 80 70 60 50 LL °i 40 a 30 20 10 0 U.S. Sieve Opening in Inches U.S. Sieve Numbers Hydrometer Gravel I Sand Cobbles Silt or Clay Coarse Fine I Coarse Medium Fine Symbol Exploration Number Sample Number Depth (ft) Natural o Moisture (/o) Soil Description Unified Soil Classification • B-1 S-2 5.0 15 Gray, gravelly SAND with silt SP-SM LANDAU ASSOCIATES Edmonds Marine Retail Property Edmonds, Washington [oil Figure Grain Size Distribution B-2 Packet Pg. 178 1 5.1.a E D M 0 N D S 336 Admiral Way • Edmonds, WA 98020-7214 • (425) 774-0549 • FAX (425)774-7837 � www.portofedmonds.org RCW 197-11-965 Adoption Notice ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Adoption of (check appropriate box) XX❑ DNS ❑ EIS ❑ Other Description of current proposal: The Port of Edmonds is planning to develop a portion of Port property current!y being -used as an unpaved parking lot on the east side of Admiral Way across from the Marina. The proposed new development anticipates construction of a new 6,650sf two story building to be used primarily for the Ports Administrative offices and Maintenance shop. Port of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: 471-Admiral way; Tax parcel #27032300415800 Title of document being adopted: SEPA, Determination of Non -Significance Agency that prepared document being adopted: Port of Edmonds Date adopted document was prepared: July 100, 201.7 Description of document (or portion) being adopted: SEPA checklist and Determination of Non-Slnnlfieance If the documet being adopted has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: N/A The document is available to be read at (place/time): Port of Edmonds Admin Office, 336-Admiral Way: M-F 4pm We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. The document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker. Name of agency adopting document: Port of Edmonds Contact person, if other than responsible official: Phone: Responsible official: Robert E. Position/1-itle: Executive Director Phone: 425-774-0549 Address: Date: 3- WAC(4/15/98) Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 179 5.1.a PREVIOUS DNS nQRT OF E D M 0 N D S 336 Admiral Way • Edmonds, WA 98020-7214 • (425) 774-0549 • FAX (425)774-7837 • www.portofedmonds.org DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The Port of Edmonds wishes to develop a portion of Port property currently being used as a parking lot. The new development will be for marine related sales and include a 6,650sf Pre -Engineered Metal Building on a 20,880sf site. Proponent: Port of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: Located at 305, 317, 345, 375, 445, 465, and 471 Admiral Way on Port of Edmonds property. Tax Parcel Number: #27032300415800 Lead agency: Port of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by July 24, 2017. Project Planner: Robert McChesney, Executive Director Responsible Official: Robert McChesney, Executive Director Contact Information: Port of Edmonds 1 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-774-0549 ----�� � e Date: � 1a t a2Q f '7 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert McChesney, Executive Di ctor, at 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal no later than July 31, 2017. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Robert McChesney to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted July 10, 2017 on the Port of Edmonds website and in the Port of Edmonds Administration office. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecywa.gov). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available for viewing at the Port of Edmonds Administration office — located on the second floor 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds WA 98020. Attachment 8 Packet Pg. 180 5.1.a PREVIOUS SEPA CHECKLIST SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision - making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Port of Edmonds Marina Development 2. Name of applicant: Shawn Rafferty- Jackson I Main Architecture 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 311 First Avenue S Seattle, WA 98105 (206)324.4800 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 12 Attachment 8 Packet Pg. 181 5.1.a 4. Date checklist prepared: 5.23.17 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Shoreline Substantial Development Permit approval by October 2017. Building permit approval by Spring 2018. Construction beginning spring 2018- Spring 2019. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A biologist report which determines the subject property is physically separated and functionally isolated from the wetlands to the east by the railroad tracks running between the wetlans and the subject property. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Edmonds Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Architectural Design Review Approval. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Development of a portion of the Port of Edmonds property currently being used as a parking lot. The new development will be for marine related sales and include a 6,650 sf Pre - Engineered Metal Building on a 20,880 sf site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Port of Edmonds property. Parcel #27032300415800. Located directly across dmiral Way from the Anthony's Restaurant. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 182 5.1.a b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? less than 1 % c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Geotechnical report to confirm. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minimum cut and fill. Balance site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Doubtful. Flat site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? approximately 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion and sediment control plan will be developed per City of Edmonds best management practices and it will be followed throughout construction. Upon protect completion, a permanent stormwater drainage system along with landscaping improvements will be in place to control erosion. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust from vehicles will be produced during construction. Dust and other airborne emissions may occur during grading and other construction activities. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractor shall implement best management practices for any diesel -operated equipment to reduce emissions and shall implement dust suppression measures as needed. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 183 5.1.a Puget Sound is located within 200' west of the subject property. Edmonds Marsh (wetlands) is located to across the railroad tracks to the east of the property. Shellabarger Creek is located across the railroad tracks to the east of the property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff (including stormwater): SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 184 5.1.a 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On -site stormwater runoff from pollution generating surfaces will be routed an on -site water quality catch basin and filtered before discharging to an existing Port of Edmonds conveyance system 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: On -site stormwater runoff from pollution generating surfaces will be routed an on -site water quality catch basin and filtered before discharging to an existing Port of Edmonds conveyance system 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will be added to the site per City of Edmonds standards SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 185 5.1.a e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Seabird colony mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Chinook Salmon, Bull Trout Surf Smelt and Dungeness Crab b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, migratory birds in adjacent wetlands d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Wetlands will not be effected this protect e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical and natural gas for heating, cooling, lighting and power b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building will be fully insulated to reduce heating and cooling loads 7. Environmental Health SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 186 5.1.a a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Present use is a parking lot. There could be oil from leaking cars. Minimum, if any. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, police and ambulance. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise will be from construction vehicles. Construction will occur only during construction operation hours as defined by the City of Shoreline. Long term, the facility will be accessible during business hours and minimal vehicular noise from patrons may occur. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short term construction noise will be limited to within City prescribed construction operation hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Parking and boat dry storage. No effect on existing uses. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 187 5.1.a how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No c. Describe any structures on the site. (1) existing shed d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? (1) existing shed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Waterfront (CW f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Master Plan Development g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Marine related activities Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? TBD. No residents. Estimated 5-15 employees of future businesses. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be designed to fit into the surrounding area. The project will directly/ indirectly serve the nearby marina. The project will be submitted for design review m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: NA SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 188 5.1.a 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30'. Glass, masonry and metal siding b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Exterior color schemes and building materials to match existing Port of Edmonds buildings and standards 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? hf elpl The proposed structure aims to maintain the outdoor lighting requirements of the commercial waterfront zone. It will provide illumination of the parking lot and outdoor display areas, and will feature architectural accent lighting. All lighting not to exceed the horizontal plane. All lighting will include daylight sensors to determine appropriate times of the day to illuminate as the seasons change. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Exisitnq street lights on Admiral Way d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All lights are to remain below the horizontal plane and to adhere to the commercial waterfront code of the City of Edmonds. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 189 5.1.a 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Boating, fishing, shopping and restaurants b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Potential clients may lease mooraae slips in marina and brina more recreation to the area 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. No b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. none known c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. N/A d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A 14. Transportation 1hel a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Admiral Way. Access to site will be from existing adjacent parking lot. No new curb cuts onto Admiral Way. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Bus routes 110, 114, 115, 116, 131, 404 and 870 run to ferry terminal north of area SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 190 5.1.a c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? There are currently 14 striped parking stalls on the property. The new development will have 24 parking stall for a gain of 10 additional parking stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Addition of new concrete sidewalk and street trees al Admiral Way e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Site approximately'/2 mile south of Edmonds -Kingston ferry terminal, adjacent to railroad. Neither twill be utilized f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Estimated 40-55 trips to and from the site (including employees) per day with a peak volumn of 3-5 trips/hr between 8am-5pm. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Provide pedestrian access via sidewalk to possible cut down on vehicular trips to site. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, police and fire protection b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Security fencing will be provided around subject property to deter theft and vandalism. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 191 5.1.a b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project will utilize electric, gas, phone, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and refuse service C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyin i n them to make its decision. Signature: Name of signee: Shawn C Rafferty Position and Agency/Organization: Designer, Jackson I Main Architecture Date Submitted: 5/26/2017 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 12 Attachment 8 1Packet Pg. 192 TRENCH \ Ce p1s.s SQ RIM=11.34 \ 6"PVC ENE IE=9.94 \\ \ 0 P\TRANS �P TRANS � GAS V I s %TRPNS _ �'GASVED CB #1558 \ P — — — _ / ASPHALT — —�2— — TELE. BOX RIM=12.32 CONCRETE 6' DI NW IE=9.32 SD SD SD ASPHALT G` G' G. G' �_— G' G` G' G• G' \ CATCH BASIN �rz I. ASPHALT -sS SS ss ss ss ss SS SS SS SS Ss Ss ss ss ss ss ss ss s 55 SS ss SS— AD M RAC WAY — J W" / W W. W — � W' W" W � —12— / 2, 8' SWI ING GATES CB #1544 RIM=11.51 6" PVC IE W =9_31 S 12'CONC NNE IE 9.21 ANTHONY GUEST �i __ — � E 12"GONG SW IE=8.86 / ^ F PARKING SIGN ;TRIAN / _ 3 HOUR _ \ �25 MPH GRAVEL _ CONCRETE TOWING ....... 4 - ....... \ Rp EONCI 75 fbN 275 GRAVEL =132 GRAVEL C/ %� unuly Rp v v TREK-H CATCHM BASIN BUILDING FF=13.2 ASPHALT \ I LEGEND ELE -13.0 \ CONC ELEV-1275 SD STORM DRAIN PIPE p EIEV-13.0 • �( �OL1C CONC CATCH BASIN - STORM FILTER RD ROOF DRAIN PIPE 12.5 CONTOUR CL1 ®DOOR - - SURFACE SLOPE DIRECTION `V / � I • yp I 5' CHAINLINK NCE� W/ BAR WIRE — '° RD RD R R6 ° RD S,RDR6RD � 13.0 CAR BASIN ElEV�1275 / \ EV= EL13.2 IE�A \� /5O R ElE1M3.1 a DOOGRAVEL 50 rPs,, \ AC 5D \� ' 2-2AC so� EIEV 123 s / AC s A e `'0 125 RECYCLE AREA O �;'_ ♦s° _ V_ limb AK �X.'.• x - X ABOVE GROUND POWERLINE _--------12- STORM RUER BLOCK WALL CATCH BABE ABOVE GROUND P ERI INF GE1211) —>>— —STORM ILTER IE6.7 CATCH CATCH BASIN �I�\ T I�-I n I� T /� _ I� , \ GE=12.25 Y `✓ T L V 'J Y V O R F R V Y.0 `` !\ 1-`" ^, I-�; �l A IE=9.7 SCALE IN FEET 10 0 10 20 Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan Page Description Packet Pg. 193 5.1.a Shoreline Evironment Designations PLN2021-0012 Port of Edmonds' Administration Building Attachment 10 HN Scale 1 inch = 300 feet Packet Pg. 195 5.1.a FILE NO.: PLN2022-0012 Applicant: Port of Edmonds DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 7th day of May, 2021, the attached Notice of Application and Public Hearing was posted at the subject property in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.03.002, City Hall and the Public Safety Complex in accordance with ECC 1.03.020. The library was not posted as the public notice area was being remodeled. I, Kernen Lien, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 71h day of May, 2021, at Edmonds, Washington. %/ 11 103 Signed: (BFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ ) Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 196 5.1.a File No.: PLN2021-0012 Applicant: Port of Edmonds Notice of Application & Public Hearing DECLARATION OF MAILING On the Th day of May, 2021, the attached Notice of application and virtual public hearing as prescribed by Ordinance to property owners within 300 feet of the site that is the subject of this application. I, Michelle Martin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this Th day of May 2021 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed:';u J Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 197 5.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING `/?C. 1 ?,9" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,650 square foot building to be used as the Port of Edmonds' administrative office and maintenance shop. The property is zone in the Commercial Waterfront zone and the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline environment. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III -A decisions. PROJECT LOCATION: 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel Number 27032300415800 NAME OF APPLICANT: Port of Edmonds FILE NUMBER: PLN2021-0012 DATE OF APPLICATION: March 29, 2021 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: April 22, 2021 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: May 7, 2021 REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review (Type III -A Permit Process) OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permit, SEPA Determination, Shoreline Permit EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Critical Areas Report, SEPA Environmental Checklist, SEPA Determination, Critical Area Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Approval (PLN2017-0029) COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 2, 2021 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httos://www.edmondswa.Rov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2021-0012, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 198 5.1.a PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: CITY CONTACT Due to COVID-19, a virtual public hearing will be held by the Architectural Design Board on June 2, 2021 at 7 p.m. Join the Zoom meeting at: https:Hzoom.us/b/95360544929?pwd=ZmdOREFORkE3RkRaeVdBRmpkN Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password: 818962 Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager kernen.lien@edmondswa.gov 42S-771-0220 `-e r :1' �Ylo— i ' Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 199 5.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH926709 PLN2021-0012 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of I issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/07/2021 and ending on 05/07/2021 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee such publication is $74.20. ::]� Subscribed and sworn beforg me on this day of Notary public in and for the State of Washington. ('i., .1 Fd,n, n , - L1 6AL AILS 1 I4101416 Kr.kNFN Llf.� �M0Phillips s- Ofa Qf' Ruhlic My�ton Ppo,nt n4of �xA ss�g6/29/�9 1 IAAA.. - - Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 200 5.1.a Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION and REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,650 square tool building to be used as the Port of Edmonds' administrative office and maintenance shop. The property is zone in the Commercial Waterfront zone and the Urban Mixed Use 11 shoreline environment. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type Ill -A decisions. PROJECT LOCATION: 471 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel N umber 27032300415800 NAME OF APPLICANT: Port of Edmonds FILE NUMBER: PLN2021-0012 DATE OF APPLICATION: March 29, 2021 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: April 22, 2021 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: May 7, 2021 REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review (Type III -A Permit Process) OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permit, SEPA Determination, Shoreline Permit EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS' Critical Areas Report, SEPA Environmental Checklist, SEPA Determination, Critical Area Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Approval (PLN2017-0029) COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 2, 2021 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, pho— to the decision on the project permit Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at hltps://www.edmondswa.govisewices/public_involve menVpublic noticesldevelopmenl_notices under the develo lent notice for application number PLN2021-0012, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: Due to COVID-19, a virtual public hearing will be held by the Architectural Design Board on June 2, 2021 at 7 p.m. Join the Zoom meeting at: https9/zoom.us/y953605449297pwd=ZmdORE FOR kE3RkRaeVc1 BWnpk NUxMZz09 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password818962 CITY CONTACT: Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager kernen Ilen@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 Published; May 7, 2021 EDH926709 Prooled by Sheppard, Dicy, 05/07/2021 09:1 1:43 am Page: 2 Attachment 11 Packet Pg. 201 5.1.a Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM May 26, 2021 Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Zachary Richardson, Stormwater Engineer PLN2021-0012 —Design Review — Commercial Waterfront Zone Port Admin Building — 471 Admiral Way Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Water and Sewer Availability Certificates have been completed and are attached for reference. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. Stormwater Engineer Review: The project proposal has been found to be feasible as it relates to stormwater management. Additional information will be required at the building permit phase of development. Refer to civil plan markups provided by City Stormwater Engineer, Zachary Richardson. Please contact Zack directly at 425-771-0220 or by email at zachary.richardsongedmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding his comments. General Engineering Review: The following comments are provided by the Engineering Program Manager, Jeanie McConnell, and are to be addressed with the civil construction plans and/or documents to be submitted as part of the building permit phase of development. Please contact Jeanie directly at 425-771-0220 or by email at Jeanie.mcconnell(kedmondswa.gov with any specific questions you may have regarding his comments. PLN2021-0012 Page 1 of 2 Attachment 12 Packet Pg. 202 5.1.a 1. A transportation impact analysis worksheet was provided consistent with ECDC Chapter 3.36. Impact fees for the subject development will be assessed at the building permit phase of development. 2. The frontage along the existing site consists of a primarily gravel walkway with concrete curb. The subject development will need to provide for ADA compliant continuous sidewalk and driveway approaches per City standards. 3. Street lights or other utilities that conflict with the proposed sidewalk will need to be relocated. 4. Street trees shall be provided behind the sidewalk. 5. Applicant is responsible for seeking approval from the local trash hauler, Sound Disposal, regarding size and location of trash enclosure. Other City requirements related to design and construction will be addressed more specifically during the building permit phase of the project. 6. Where public utilities, such as water meters, are located on private property, public utility easements shall be provided. 7. Consideration should be given to locating the sprinkler riser room near the front of the building such that the fire line can enter directly from the ROW into the building. Where less than 10-ft exists between the property line and the building, the DCDA can be located in the riser room. Please also coordinate with the Fire Department. 8. Utility patches in Admiral Way with less than 20-feet of separation shall be combined and full width or half width overlay will be required depending on the extent of disturbance. Where utility patches fall entirely within one travel lane, the overlay shall extend to the centerline of roadway. Where utility patches extend into both travel lanes then a full width overlay is required. Thank you. PLN2021-0012 Page 2 of 2 Attachment 12 Packet Pg. 203 5.1.a 0 RD4,1 WATER AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATE PERMITTING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 3.21 5th Avenue N P: 42S.771.0220 www.edmondswa.aov ITEMS IN THIS BOX TO BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT ® Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Subdivision ❑ Rezone or Other Applicant's name: Jackson Main Architecture — Meghan Craig Proposed Use: Port of Edmonds Administration Building Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): 47i Admiral Way Updated on 8/14/2018 Attachment 12 Yu Packet Pg. 204 5.1.a ITEMS IN THIS BOX TO BE FILLED IN BY EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Permit Number PLN2021-0012 Project Name Port of Edmonds Administration Building R 1. X a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing 8-inch (size) water main that is adjacent to the site. OR ❑ b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ❑ (1). feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (z). The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ (-A). Other (describe): z. ® a. The water system is in conformance with a City approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This will cause a delay in permit issuance and approval.) I ® a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City, or has been granted Boundary Review board approval for extension of service outside the City, or is within the City approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Z a. Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than zo psi Measured at the nearest fire hydrant 6o feet from the building/property (or as marked on attached map) Rate of Flow Duration ❑ Lessthan Soo gpm. (approximately gpm) ❑ Less than one (i) hour CJ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ One (1) to two (2) hours ❑ i5oo gpm or more ® Two (2) hours or more ❑ Flow test of gpm ❑ Other ® Calculation of 56o5 gpm (Commercial building permits require flow test or calculation) OR ❑ b. Water will system is not capable of providing fire flow. WATER AGENCY CERTIFICATION COMMENTS/CONDITIONS: Per model Static Pressure is i 0.20 Psi at i000 qpm, residual pressure is 12Psi at max flow Of 2185 qpm, residual pressure is 3.o6 psi I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. City of Edmonds Russell Lynch (Agency Name) Signatory Printed me Associate En ineer (Title) (Signature/Date) Attachment 12 Packet Pg. 205 Updated on 811412018 Pa 5.1.a F :�M SEWER AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATE PERMITTING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 121 5th Avenue N P: 425.771.0220 www.edmondswa.aov ITEMS IN THIS BOX TO BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT ® Building Permit Preliminary Plat or PUD Subdivision Rezone or Other Applicant's name: Jackson Main Architecture — Meghan Craig Proposed Use: Port of Edmonds Administration Building Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): 473. Admiral Way Updated on 31312017 Attachment 12 t' Packet Pg. 206 5.1.a ITEMS IN THIS BOX TO BE FILLED IN BY EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Permit Number PLN2021-0012 Project Name Port of Edmonds Administration Building 1. ® a. Sewer service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing 8-inch size sewer main that is approximately qo feet from the site. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1). feet of sewer main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (z). The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or ❑ (3). Other (describe): 2. ® a. The sewer system is in conformance with a City approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. (This will cause a delay in permit issuance and approval.) 1 ® a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City, or has been granted Boundary Review board approval for extension of service outside the City, or is within the City approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. SEWER AGENCY CERTIFICATION COMMENTS/CONDITIONS: I hereby certify that the above information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. City of Edmonds Russell Lynch (Agency Name) Signatory Printed Name Associate En ineer (Title) ('gnature/Date) Updated on 31312017 Attachment 12 Pa Packet Pg. 207 CIVIL PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE DRY SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES: µ � \ ✓ \ 1. SOILS REPORT 3 \ RIM=11.51 I SD SD I REPORT NUMBER: 152]002.010.011 6" PVC SW IE=9.31 12"CONC NNE IE=9.21 PREPARED BY: LANDAU ASSOCIATES 12 CONC SW IE=8.�6 _ G* DATED: DUNE 22, 2017 ASPHALT - G* G* G* \ G.G* 1 I 2. AMIN IMUM OF THORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND VVERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN DRY i5 SS \ I 1 I I UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC) AND SEWER, WATER AND STORM, AND A MINIMUM OF S' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND V VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM ANY CITY OWNED LINES. „�- - - - � I SS SS SS SS \ � SS I I SS I � 3. NEW/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (INCLUDING ROW): 19,884 SF OUTED BY CATCH B DETENTION PIPE THROUGH ROOF DRAINS. NEW BUILDINGSIDEWALK: 1, 33 FROOF AREA. COLLECOFFTED NEW SIDEWALK: 11,0 SF. RUNOFF BYCATCHBASIN I F COULETED - NEW DRIVEWAY: BASINS. BYCACATCH RUNOFFLLECED % } ADMIRAL WAY - - _ 9775F.R75 LANDSAPCING:1,8]75F. RUNOFF COLLECTED BY CATCH BASINS. BY BA - ROW SIDEWALK:1,124 SF. RUNOFF FLOWS INTO ADMIRAL WAY. w* W. w* w* w* W. TYPE II CB W/SOLID LID W W. 3 I I I RIM: 12.11 u IE (6" PVC W): 9.14 I i 3 IE(6"PVC SW:9.14 IE (6" PVC S): 9.14 I j I LL I ; I ✓� �^ 12.26 12.39 12.16 a _J 3 12.04 11.76 11.62 IE (6"PVC N): 9.14 _____ a L 11.62 ______ 12.76 kl ______________� TOWING 12,66 d =TOC: 12.66 A 4276 D II.i4 $ - OC: W4 D - TOC: 12.26 �� - A D - n AT�C: TOO: 12.12 __1 - - 31 12.48 3. 4 D _ 12.70 12'� D 12,26 12.4.Y 11.95 ON _ iN n-pro-Jro - .-- (2F STEPS @ 7" I 13 LF"6"PVC @0.5% 12.44 12.54 E P TRLItt UTENCN S: �\ \ 12.84 13.42 14.00 (2) STEPS @ ]" 12.53 13.11 13.69 ENTRY: 14.00 _4 _ D - TOC: 13.90 4` ` ---_` �--_- 13.40 \ 12.31 Y --- G /�O/ 2'X10'PERFORATED STUB XJ OUTCONNECTION / \ I , iqK �j C3.3 IE: 9.80 f ROOF AND FOOTING DRAIN e 12.48 - \ \ \ 2 A � 0 @ � \ \ \ MODULAR WETLAND SY RIMaz.os: L2..S WS) s PAVING LEGEND \ (2) STEPS @ 7" � \ \ y I IE IN (6" PVC 5): 9.47 � NEW ASPHALT 14.00 ,--` �� zT ENTRY: 14.00 \ a TOC: 13.91 13.41 u 4 IE IN (6" PVC W): 9.47 IE OUT (6"PVC N): 9.21 OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITY SAWCUT \ TOC: 13.91 I C3. e NEW CONCRETE 13. 2 14.00 13%t 13.24 (2)STEPS @7" PROPOSED BUILDING \ D \ GRADING QUANTITIES 13.42 FFE: 14.0 13.59 ® TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) 20 CU YDS TOTAL 2 \ \ 13.04 13.28 EMBANKMENT (FILL)- 530 CU VDS 13.69 \ TOTAL 550 CUYDS - ---------- - 14.00 13.32 ABOVEAR FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS LANDING AREA(1.5% MAX CROSS SLOPE) D ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE.PO NOT USE FOR ONLY THESEV VALUES ARE ATE. 13.61 13.24 BIDDING, PAYMENT, OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES. \ 13.97 13.51 2 2',10' PERFORATED STUB C3. OUT CONNERION D 13.43 13.16 =.5% rvv IE: 10.80 TOO : 13.87 13.78 SDCO, TVP 12.72 12,16 -MF-RiP AnR/F RiF-RiT-R1F-wT-wF MF-ALA vF, _ _ _______ ___ _ _ ____________ I 13.68 13.08 y� I TYPE CB 2 3 4 RIM: 12.17 C3. C3. C3. IE (6" DIP E): 10.67 TRASH AREA SEE ARCH PLANS I lrs / I 149 IF 6" DIP RECYCI E AREA i D 12.69 1 A GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1" =10' IJACKSON I MAIN 1/ ARCH ITECTU RE PQOF EDNI0ND5 14.00 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE I N WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL I ALL AROUND, WRAPPED IN 8" MIN FROM WOOD. @� NON, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SLOPE AT 0.5% MILE FABRIC, SLOPE _ RF0.5%MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS I I ASSHOWN 6" DOWNSPOUTTIGHTLINE FINISHED GRADE TO CONVEYANCE SYSTEM @ 0.5%MIN. PLACE NEXT TO I FOOTING DRAININ AS 12.74 SHOWN ON GRADING & -I -- 13.25 12.]5 DRAINAGE PLAN 2.J9� 1 TYPE TYPE I CB 'CONTRA MAV LOCATE ° RIM: 12.45 ON EITHER SIDE OF 0 °O � O I IE (6'DIP W): 9.92 FOOT I NG DRAIN)' ^ 00 p 13.6 IE (6"PVC N): 9.92 p° o a n I 2 3 4 .q 0 °O^o c C3. C3. C3. LINE OF MAX EXCAVATION. 0 O ° o �Q 13.50 IF SOIL IS OVEREXCAVATED, REPLACE WITH LEAN MIX O O 0 o o 0 0 a u 13.00 \ CONCRETE - - 13-8 1 I _ _- 1 " � FOOTING - - - - - - - - �ABDVE J OROUNO PowERUNE *J FOOTING AND ROOF DRAIN SECTION L SCALE: NTS © THIS PLAN SET IS FOR A DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL AND W ILL ^ BE FURTHER DETAILED FOR FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT. Attachment 12 IEE11,11,11111DIPJIEll E, IIHI 1Ei:........................................................................................ IEIY":................................°......-----.................--------............,............ �CI'I"'II' II''��i�IINIEINII:I'',;I'�iIIIPIINfii� I[Ilhq:"riilU;lllll ................................................................................................. °..................,........... 471 ADMIRAL WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 i nm Packet Pg. 208 5.1.a Critical Area Determination (CRA20170095) Based on a review and inspection of the subject site, staff has determined that one or more critical areas are located on or near the site. Critical areas are ecologically sensitive or hazardous areas that are protected in order to maintain their functions and values. Site Location 471 Admiral Way Tax Account Number 27032300415800 Property Owner Port of Edmonds Applicant Bob McChesney Critical Area(s) Present ❑X Wetlands (ECDC 23.50) ❑X Frequently Flooded Areas (ECDC 23.70) ❑X Geologically Hazardous Areas (ECDC 23.80) ❑ Erosion Hazard Areas ❑ Landslide Hazard Areas ❑X Seismic Hazard Areas ❑X Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (ECDC 23.90) ❑X Streams Site Description The subject property lies between Admiral Way and the Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-way. The Edmonds Marsh is on the east side of the railroad right-of-way from the subject property and the Willow Creek outlet from the marsh also runs along the east side of the railroad. The proscribed buffer widths in the critical area regulations from Willow Creek and the Edmonds Marsh may extend across the railroad right-of-way onto the subject property. The property is in a mapped liquefaction hazard area and thus is a potential seismic hazard area pursuant to ECDC 23.80. FEMA is in the process of updating its FIRM maps, and the draft maps identify this property is being within the 100-year flood plain with a base flood elevation of 12-feet. While the FEMA FIRM maps are not officially effective yet (current schedule is Winter 2018), the identified 12-foot base flood elevation has been shown on the draft FIRM maps for the past few years and is more than likely to be the flood elevation once the maps become effective. Pursuant to ECDC 23.70.010.13, the City is considering the draft FIRM maps the most recent information and any development within the area will be subject to the flood plain development regulations. Attachment 13 1Packet Pg. 209 5.1.a What does this mean? The critical area regulations are only triggered when an alteration is proposed to a critical area or its buffer. However, once an alteration in or near critical area is proposed, critical area studies and City review and approval may be required. What is an `Alteration'? According to Section 23.40.005 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC): "Alteration" means any human -induced action which changes the existing conditions of a critical area or its buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to: grading, filling; dredging; draining; channelizing; cutting, pruning, limbing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing vegetation; applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance; discharging pollutants; paving, construction, application of gravel; modifying for surface water management purposes; or any other human activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat value of critical areas. Kernen Lien, Senior Planner June 30, 2017 Name, Title Signature Date Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found at http://www. codepublishing. com/WA/Edmonds Environmentally Critical Areas General Provisions (ECDC 23.40) Wetlands (ECDC 23.50) Frequently Flooded Areas (ECDC23.70) Geologically Hazardous Areas (ECDC 23.80) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (ECDC 23.90) Building permits — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas (ECDC 19.10) City of Edmonds GIS map tool with approximate location of critical areas: http://Mops.edmondswa.gov Page 12 Attachment 13 1Packet Pg. 210 " ;. p �• �' \IMMEMEMEMEN MEME1 \mom����1 MEMEMEN , da��e, °�o� tea. 'Room, lk 1255000 FT 122' 24' 22" 47' 48' 45" , 300000 FT 1260000 FT 122' 22' 30" 47° 48' 45" 5.1.a 295000 FT 290000 FT 47° 46' 52" � 122' 24' 22" FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT HTTP://MSC.FEMA.GOV Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A,V, A99 With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS # Regulatory Floodway 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard zone x OTHER AREAS OF Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee FLOOD HAZARD See Notes. Zone X NO SCREENI Areas Determined to be Outside the OTHER 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x e AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D ------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer mTmTmTmTffTffm Accredited or Provisionally Accredited GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall STRUCTURES Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall OTHER FEATURES (0:::t182 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation (BFE) - - - - Coastal Transect --- - Coastal Transect Baseline - Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature ^^^^N 513^^^^N Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary 545000m E 546000mE NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website. Users may determine the current map date for each FIRM panel by visiting the FEMA Map Service Center website or by calling the FEMA Map Information eXchange. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Base map information shown on this panel was provided by the USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office. This information was derived from digital orthophotography at a scale of 1:12,000 and 1-meter pixel resolution from photography dated 2009. SCALE i Map Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet; Western Hemisphere; Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000 0 500 0 125 PANEL LOCATOR 1,000 2,000 Feet Meters 250 500 1305 1315 * PANEL NOT PRINTED 5295000mN 5294000mN 5293000mN U 47° 46' 52" 122' 22' 30" W � s �U. 4F i '01M ME X - ap- ��- �rradr NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON (AND INCORPORATED AREAS) a'���•4prRTyt�� PANEL 1292 OF 1575 4� ND S�� FEMA Panel Contains: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1292 F SNOHOMISH COUNTY 535534 1292 F WOODWAY, TOWN OF 530308 1292 F VERSION NUMBER 2.3.2.1 MAP NUMBER 53061C1292F EFFECTIVE DATE Attachment 13 Packet Pg. 212 5.1.a I <!jC J gy, 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner RE: Port of Edmonds Marine Retail Building Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Design Review PLN20170029 (SSDP) & PLN20170030 (DR) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION INTRODUCTION The Port of Edmonds is seeking approval of a shoreline substantial development permit and design review for a new 6,650sf marine retail building intended for boat sales and maintenance to be located at 471 Admiral Way. The shoreline Substantial development permit and design review are approved with conditions. ORAL TESTIMONY Kernen Lien, Edmonds Senior Planner, summarized the proposal. Mr. Lien noted that this is the first proposal reviewed under the City's new shoreline regulations. In response to examiner questions, Mr. Lien noted that the site is currently a gravel parking lot. He identified that a long green parcel located south of the project site is a stormwater site. He noted that the parcels to the south are mostly vacant critical areas and the stormwater tract. There are no public uses with views that would be impaired by the proposal. There are some public walking areas on the periphery of the critical areas. Robert McChesney, Port of Edmonds Executive Director, noted that the Port of Edmonds is an economic development business and the proposal is the last parcel on the marine site of the Port. He noted that demand has increased for Port property SSDP and Design Review P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 213 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 because the marine uses in South Lake Union have been driven out by Vulcan development. Shawn Rafferty, project architect, noted that the proposal has been designed to conform to all applicable design standards and has been approved by the Design Review Committee. Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds resident, wanted to make sure that the proposal was consistent with recent code changes and past planning decisions for the project site. Mr. Lien clarified that the proposal has been reviewed under recent changes to both shoreline and critical area regulations. EXHIBITS The October 20, 2017 Staff Report and 19 attachments were admitted as Ex. 1 during the October 26, 2017 hearing. The staff power point was entered as Exhibit 2. FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: 1. Applicant/Owner. The applicant is Robert McChesney, Port of Edmonds Director. 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application on October 26, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. at the Edmonds Public Safety Complex in the City Council Chambers. Substantive: 3. Site/Proposal Description. The Port of Edmonds proposes to construct a new 6,650sf marine retail building intended for boat sales and maintenance at 471 Admiral Way (Ex. 1, Att. 1 — 6, 9). The site is also located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation (Ex. 1, Att. 10). The project site encompasses approximately 20,500sf of a 185,182sf parcel. The site is currently a gravel/paved parking area. The project site is located within Flood Zone AE per the preliminary FEMA flood maps. The structure must be designed and constructed to resist the effect of flood hazards and flood loads. The subject site is relatively level. The Port of Edmonds is a water -related business. 4. Characteristics of the Area. The surrounding sites to the north, west, and southwest of the subject site are zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). These surrounding sites are developed with various uses including parking areas, a marina, restaurants, a yacht club, the Port of Edmonds offices, a work yard, and vacant land. The BNSF railroad is located directly southeast of the subject property. To the east of SSDP and Design Review p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 214 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the subject site (on the opposite side of the BNSF railroad) is the Harbor Square complex, which is zoned General Commercial (CG) under a contract rezone (R-1979- 4) and is developed with various commercial uses including breweries, a gym, a hotel, and offices. To the southeast of the project site (on the opposite side of the BNSF railroad) is the Edmonds Marsh, which is within the Open Space (OS) zone. 5. Adverse Impacts. There are no significant adverse impacts created by the proposal. Impacts are more specifically addressed as follows: A. Wetlands, Streams and Marshes. No impacts to wetlands, streams or marshes are anticipated. During the Shoreline Master Program update the Edmonds Marsh was determined to be a Category II estuarine wetland. Pursuant to ECDC 24.40.020.E, the buffer for a Category II estuarine wetland is 110 or 150 feet depending on whether certain mitigation measures are implemented. Willow Creek is an anadromous fish bearing stream with a buffer of 100 feet pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040.D. The Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek are separated from the subject property via the Burlington Northern railroad right- of-way. ECDC 23.40.220.C.4 allows development within an interrupted stream or wetland buffer where it is demonstrated a project is functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. The applicants submitted a Wetland/Waterway Critical Areas Assessment prepared by Steve Quarterman of Landau Associates (Ex. 1, Att. 6) demonstrating the proposed project is functionally isolated from the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek by the railroad right-of-way. The project will not impact the wetland, stream or marsh and if is authorized to be located within the buffers of those critical areas (if that is the case) because it qualifies as functionally isolated. B. Wildlife. No impact to wildlife is anticipated. Wildlife associated with the property is typical of an urban environment. The site may be visited by song birds and small mammals; however, the site is primarily gravel/paved, so it is not currently providing any significant habitat value. C. Frequently Flooded Areas. Building design will minimize impact from frequently flooded areas. The subject property is located within Flood Zone AE according to draft FEMA flood plain maps. The City of Edmonds has determined that all development applications within the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones in the draft FEMA flood insurance rate map will be subject to the requirements of the International Building Code amendments in ECDC 19.00.025.P (Ex. 1, Att. 16). D. Seismic Hazard. Impacts from seismic hazards will be mitigated. The subject site is located within a mapped liquefaction hazard area. A condition of approval will require the applicant to submit a geotechnical report during the building permit review to ensure the structure is designed and constructed to standards related to liquefaction seismic hazards. SSDP and Design Review p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 215 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 E. Vegetation. Impacts to vegetation are limited. The site contains very limited existing vegetation since the majority of the site is gravel/paved and is utilized as a parking lot. There are existing street trees located between the site and Admiral Way. F. Shoreline. As conditioned, the project will comply with the City's Shoreline Master Program. The subject site is located within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline designation of the Shoreline Master Program (Ex. 1, Att. 10). Due to the project's location within 200 feet of the shoreline, the proposal is subject to the requirements of the City's Shoreline Master Program (Title 24 ECDC). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Procedural: 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. ECDC 20.01.003 classifies design review (where public hearing required by ADB) as a Type III-B action and shoreline substantial development permits with public hearings as Type III -A actions. Pursuant to ECDC 20.01.002.13, the design review and variance applications have been consolidated into a Type III-B action. ECDC 20.01.003(B) and ECDC 20.01.002(C) provide the Hearing Examiner with the authority to review and issue final decisions upon consolidated Type III-B applications. Substantive: 2. Zoning Designation. The subject property is zoned Commercial Waterfront (CW). 3. Review Criteria and Application. Chapter 24.80 ECDC governs the review criteria for shoreline substantial development permits. Relevant criteria are quoted below and applied through corresponding conclusions of law. Design review was addressed by the Architectural Design Board. Shoreline Master Program Review 1. ECDC 24.80.040 Substantial Development Permit Criteria. A. A substantial development permit shall be required for all proposed use and development of shorelines unless the proposal is specifically exempt pursuant to ECDC 24.80.010. B. In order for a substantial development permit to be approved, the decision maker must find that the proposal is consistent with the following criteria: 1. All regulations of the city of Edmonds shoreline master program appropriate to the shoreline designation and the type of use or development proposed shall be met, except those bulk and dimensional SSDP and Design Review p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 216 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 standards that have been modified by an approval of a shoreline variance under ECDC 24.80.060. 2. All policies of the city of Edmonds shoreline master program appropriate to the shoreline designation and the type of use or development proposed shall be considered and substantial compliance demonstrated. 4. The subject development is not specifically exempted by ECDC 24.80.010; thus, a shoreline substantial development permit is required. The analysis below demonstrates how the proposal is consistent with the relevant regulations and policies of the Edmonds' Shoreline Master Program Chapter 24.20 ECDC Goals and Policies for the Edmonds Shoreline Master Program ECDC 24.20.010 Economic Development Element ECDC 24.20.01O.B Economic Development Goal. It is a goal of the city to encourage port facilities, tourist facilities, mixed use, commercial and light industrial development in specific and limited shoreline areas which enhance the public's access to the shoreline. Water -dependent, -oriented and water -enjoyment development are preferred in shoreline areas. The nature of this economic development should attract, and be open to, the general public and should not unduly interfere with the character of the shoreline area or with nearby shoreline and upland uses ECDC 24.20.010.0 Economic Development Policies 1. Mixed use commercial and light industrial uses in the shoreline area should be permitted only where compatible with existing or planned shoreline and upland development, or where legal parcels of land can be aggregated to minimize the impacts from the mixed use commercial or light industrial use. 2. Mixed use commercial and light industrial uses should be permitted only where infrastructure, particularly the roadway system, is presently adequate or is made adequate to accommodate the demands generated by commercial or light industrial development. 3. New shoreline light industrial and commercial development should be limited to that which is classified as water -dependent, water -related, or water - enjoyment uses and non -water -oriented uses which are not accessory to a water - oriented use should be discouraged and/or prohibited. 6. Development should be discouraged in any critical area and only allowed where impacts to these areas can be mitigated. SSDP and Design Review p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 217 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12. Commercial activities in shoreline areas should be operated with minimum adverse impact on the quality of the environment of the shoreline and adjacent areas. 5. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 3, the Port of Edmonds is a water -related business. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the Port of Edmonds operations and surrounding uses as identified in Finding of Fact No. 4. Staff have determined the roadway system is adequate to accommodate the proposed use. The site's location on the east side of Admiral Way minimizes impacts to the shoreline and does not interfere with public access to the shoreline area. As described in Finding of Fact No. 5, the development site is located in an interrupted buffer that is currently a graveled parking area and will not result in any impacts to critical areas or the shoreline environment. This proposal is consistent with the policies quoted above. ECDC 24.20.040 Circulation Element ECDC 24.20.040.B Circulation Goal. It is the goal of the city to provide for the safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and emergency services within the shoreline area while recognizing and enhancing the unique, fragile and scenic character of the shoreline area with minimum disruption to the shoreline environment and minimum conflict between different users. ECDC 24.20.040.0 Circulation Policies 1. Railroad Avenue, Dayton Street, Main Street, Admiral Way, and Sunset Avenue, which provide access to and through the city's accessible downtown shoreline area, should be designed and regulated to safely accommodate the vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic using these corridors, as well as to facilitate egress and ingress from adjacent properties and to enhance the scenic character and recreational use of this corridor, while recognizing that shoreline uses should have primary access to Railroad Avenue and Admiral Way. 2. Whenever practicable, safe pedestrian and bicycle movement on and off roadways in the shoreline area should be encouraged as a means of personal transportation and recreation. 6. The development is located on the east side of Admiral Way. As proposed, frontage improvements will be constructed along Admiral Way (Ex. 1, Att. 3). A new pedestrian walkway on the west side of the development will help improve non - motorized circulation. The proposal is consistent with the circulation policies. ECDC 24.20.050 Shoreline Use Element ECDC 24.20.050.B Shoreline Use Goals 1. Allow for a diversity of uses within the shoreline area consistent with the dramatically different character of the various shorelines within the city, and to SSDP and Design Review p. 6 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 218 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 preserve and enhance the natural and aesthetic quality of important shoreline areas while allowing for reasonable development which meet the goals and policies of the Shoreline Management Act. 3. Reserve shoreline and water areas particularly suited for specific and appropriate uses, especially water -oriented and water -dependent uses, for such uses whether they are existing or potential. ECDC 24.20.050.0 Shoreline Use Policies 1. "Environmentally critical areas " are to be protected and regulated consistent with the city's environmental review and critical areas regulations contained in Chapters 20.15A and 23.40 through 23.90 ECDC, less the exceptions listed in ECDC 24.40.020(C). 2. New uses and developments in shoreline areas that have established desirable development patterns should be designed to be compatible with those areas; provided the existing uses are consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and the city's comprehensive plan and shoreline master program. 9. Shoreline use should be compatible with its site, in harmony with adjacent uses, and consistent with long-range comprehensive planning for waterfront use. 7. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5A, no impacts to environmentally critical areas are anticipated. The development is exempt from wetlands (ECDC 24.40.020.E) and stream (ECDC 23.90.040.D) buffers because the buffer is physically interrupted by the BNSF railroad right of way (ECDC 23.40.020.C.4) and the proposal is therefore functionally isolated from the critical areas. Additionally, the standard buffers for the wetlands are exempt under ECDC 24.40.020.C.2.b. As noted in Conclusion of Law No. 5, the proposed marine retail and service use is a water -oriented type use which is compatible with and well suited to development within the Port of Edmonds. As determined by the Architectural Design Board, the use is consistent with the Edmonds Community Development Code and the City's Comprehensive Plan (Ex. 1, Att. 18). As determined by Conclusion of Law No. 18, the proposed development is consistent with the Shoreline Management Act. The proposal is consistent with the policies. ECDC 24.20.100 Urban Design Element ECDC 24.20.100.B. Urban Design Goal. It is a goal of the city to encourage development within the shoreline area that is visually coherent, provides visual and physical linkage to the shoreline, enhances the waterfront, and is consistent with the streetscape plan. ECDC 24.20.100.0 Urban Design Policies SSDP and Design Review p. 7 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 219 1 5.1.a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1. The shoreline area within and south of the north boundary of the Brackett's Landing North Park, to the south city limits (generally the urban mixed use shoreline environment) is one of the most scenic areas of the city. It also, to a large extent, establishes the visual identity of Edmonds. As such, both public and private development in these areas should be controlled and regulated to provide an urban environment which preserves or enhances the opportunity for the public to enjoy the scenic quality of the shoreline. 2. Projects should be encouraged to provide "street furniture, " public art, related interpretative signage, landscaping and other amenities within or adjacent to the right-of-way of Railroad Avenue and Admiral Way to complement a pedestrian promenade along the shoreline consistent with the streetscape plan. 4. New and remodeled developments should provide public view corridors adjacent to either the north or south property line to enhance public visual access to the Puget Sound and to provide for a visual link between the downtown and its waterfront roots. The location of the view corridor should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties in order to maximize public visual access to the Puget Sound. Properties with significant frontage on the shoreline should consider providing view corridors in multiple locations so as to maximize public visual access to the shoreline. In the application of design standards, the preservation of public views shall be given priority over landscaping and fencing requirements. 5. Projects should minimize the amount of vehicular parking in the urban mixed use I and II shoreline environments through use of joint use parking agreements (where permitted), and by locating employee parking off -site and outside the urban mixed use I and II shoreline environments. 6. Projects should be designed to locate vehicular parking away from the shoreline, bulkhead, or areas of pedestrian circulation. 8. The proposed development is located on the east side of Admiral Way. Admiral Way lies between the subject and Puget Sound. Therefore, the development will not obstruct views of the shoreline. As described in Conclusion of Law No. 12, the proposed development complies with the view corridor requirements of ECDC 24.40.040.11 and will result in obstruction of less than 15% of the total parcel. After the proposed building is constructed, 85 percent of the parcel will still provide view corridors including the southern 300 feet of the parcel and the northern 530 feet of the parcel. Parking for the proposed development is located on the east side of the building away from the street and pedestrian walkway and as far away from the Puget Sound shoreline as possible in this location. A condition of approval will require the applicant to install a bench on the west side of the proposed development along the pedestrian walkway. As conditioned, the proposal SSDP and Design Review P. 8 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 220 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 is consistent with the policies. Chapter 24.30 ECDC Shoreline Environments ECDC 24.30.070 Urban Mixed Use ECDC 24.30.070.A Purpose. The purpose of the urban mixed -use environment is to provide for high -intensity, water -oriented commercial, transportation, and industrial uses while protecting existing ecological functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been previously degraded. ECDC 23.30.070.B.3 Designation Criteria. Urban Mixed Use H. This designation is assigned to areas that are suitable and planned for high -intensity, water -dependent uses related to commerce, transportation, and recreation. ECDC 23.30.070.1) Management Policies 1. In regulating uses in the urban mixed -use environments, first priority should be given to water -dependent uses. Second priority should be given to water -related and water -enjoyment uses. Non -water -oriented uses may be allowed as part of mixed use developments. Non -water -oriented uses may also be allowed in limited situations where they do not conflict with or limit opportunities for water -oriented uses or on sites where there is no direct access to the shoreline. 2. Full utilization of existing urban areas should be achieved before further expansion of intensive development is allowed. 4. Where feasible, visual and physical public access should be provided. 5. Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as sign control regulations, appropriate development siting, screening and architectural standards, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers. 6. Any new development or redevelopment should utilize low impact development techniques where feasible and appropriate. 7. Any new development shall include environmental cleanup, restoration of shoreline or other development techniques where feasible and appropriate to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions, and shall comply with any relevant state and federal law. 9. The proposed development is a water -oriented commercial use consistent with the purpose of the Urban Mixed -Use shoreline environment. The project represents infill development on an underutilized shoreline site. The development will result in no net loss of shoreline ecologically functions and values. The ADB found the project consistent with the design guidelines of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan SSDP and Design Review P. 9 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 221 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 and Chapter 20.11 ECDC (Ex. 1, Att. 17 and 18 adopted herein as if set forth in full). As determined in Conclusion of Law No. 8, visual and public access to the shoreline will not be impacted by the proposed development. The proposal is consistent with the policies. Chapter 24.40 ECDC General Policies and Regulations ECDC 24.40.020 Critical Areas The Shoreline Master Program adopts the City of Edmonds' critical area ordinance, as codified in Chapters 23.40 through 23.90 ECDC (dated May 3, 2016, Ord. 4026, except for the specific subsections identified in ECDC 24.40.020. C. 10. As described above in Conclusion of Law No. 7, no impacts to environmentally critical areas are anticipated. The development is exempt from wetlands (ECDC 24.40.020.E) and stream (ECDC 23.90.040.D) buffers because the buffer is physically interrupted by the BNSF railroad right of way (ECDC 23.40.020.C.4) and the project site is functionally isolated from the critical areas. Additionally, the standard buffers for the wetlands are exempt under ECDC 24.40.020.C.2.b. ECDC 24.40.030 Flood Hazard Reduction Development within the shoreline environment are required to meet the standards and provisions for protection of frequently flooded areas as provided to areas of special flood hazard in the current edition of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in Title 19 ECDC. ECDC 24.40.030.E also notes that development and redevelopment shall be located and designed to prevent the need for structural flood hazard reduction measures. 11. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5C, the subject property is located within Flood Zone AE according to draft FEMA flood plain maps. The City of Edmonds has determined that all development applications within the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones in the draft FEMA flood insurance rate map will be subject to the requirements of the International Building Code amendments in ECDC 19.00.025.P (Ex. 1, Att. 16). Staff have determined, the proposed development does not require structural flood hazard reduction measures. A condition of approval will require the building to meet the flood hazard requirements of ECDC 19.00.025.P. ECDC 24.40.040 Public Access and Views The proposed development will not impact public access to the shoreline area and the regulations related to public access in ECDC 24.40.040.B.I through B.9 are not applicable to the project. However, the view protect regulations of ECDC 24.40.040.B.10 and B.11 are applicable to the development. ECDC 24.40.040.B.I La.i provides: SSDP and Design Review P. 10 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 222 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Landward of the ordinary high-water mark, a view corridor must be maintained across 30 percent of the average parcel width. The view corridor must be in one continuous piece. Within the view corridor, structures, parking areas, and landscaping will be allowed; provided, that they do not obscure the view from adjacent public right-of-way to and beyond the Puget Sound. This view corridor must be adjacent to either the north or south property line, whichever will result in the widest view corridor given development on adjacent properties. If the subject property has shoreline frontage in excess of 1,000 feet, the city may require a maximum of one-third of the required view corridor to be placed in a location between the north and south property lines, in a location which will provide for the greatest unobstructed view of the Puget Sound. 12. The parcel where the proposed development will occur is approximately 1,600 feet long (from south to north). There are currently only two structures on the parcel. Jacobsen's Marine is approximately 130 feet wide and a smaller structure adjacent to the development site is approximately 10 feet wide. The proposed marine retail building is approximately 100 feet wide. After the proposed building is constructed, 85 percent of the parcel will still provide view corridors including the southern 300 feet of the parcel and the northern 530 feet of the parcel. This standard is satisfied. ECDC 24.40.060 Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution A. Applicability. The following provisions apply to all development and uses within shoreline jurisdiction that may affect water quality: B. Regulations. 1. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be submitted with a permit application for activities that involve the removal of vegetation, stockpiling of earth or other materials, or any activity that could result in shoreline erosion or siltation. Said program shall conform to the city of Edmonds' stormwater code requirements, engineering design standards and shall at a minimum utilize best management practices (BMPs) to prevent shoreline erosion and siltation. 2. The bulk storage of oil, fuel, chemicals, or hazardous materials, on either a temporary or permanent basis, shall not occur in shoreline without adequate secondary containment and an emergency spill response plan in place. 3. All development approved under this shoreline master program shall be designed and maintained consistent with the city's stormwater comprehensive plan, all codes related to stormwater, and engineering design standards. 4. New development is encouraged to employ low impact development principles and practices such as setbacks, retaining land cover, and reducing impervious areas, and using special caution to avoid infiltration of stormwater in shoreline SSDP and Design Review P. 11 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 223 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 areas along marine bluffs. 13. The applicant provided a preliminary storm water report (Ex. 1, Att. 4). Engineering staff found the preliminary storm water report compliant with the requirements of Chapter 18.30 ECDC, the City's stormwater comprehensive plan and engineering design standards. Compliance with the City's storm water regulations in Chapter 18.30 ECDC will also meet the provisions of ECDC 24.40.060 and will be verified with the building permit review. The project will not provide bulk storage of hazardous materials. This criterion is satisfied. ECDC 24.40.080 Shoreline development permitted by area designation 14. ECDC 24.40.080 identifies the allowed uses in the various shoreline area designations. Water -oriented commercial and light industrial uses are permitted via a shoreline substantial development permit within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline environment. The proposed marine retail building qualifies a water -oriented commercial development. ECDC 24.40.090 Shoreline bulk and dimensional standards The bulk and dimensional requirements for commercial development within the Urban Mixed Use II shoreline environmental in ECDC 24.40.090 are detailed in the table below: Shore Building Side Maximum Max;mum Panting Setback Setback B��ffer Setback's Height Coverage 15 feet N/A N."A C�/1512-1 30feet None 60feet� 2 See ECDC 24.40.040(B)(11) for view corridor requirements. 3 No side setback is required from adjacent commercial property. A minimum 15-foot setback is required from lot line adjacent to shoreline residential environments. The area must be fully landscaped and include a minimum six -foci high fence or hedge. 7 In the urban mixed use I and II environment, the 60-foot setback for parking may be reduced by a maximurn of 20 feet. See ECDC 24.60.050(D)(2)(c) and (13)(3)(c). 15 Side setback determined by the underlying zoning. No required side setback in the 13132, CG, or M P 2 zones. Five-foot side setback in the OR zone. 15. The proposed building is located more than 15 feet from both Puget Sound and the Willow Creek outlet on the east side of the railroad right-of-way. The parking area is more than 60 feet from Puget Sound and Willow Creek. No side setbacks are required as the site is not adjacent to any shoreline residential environments and the proposal is consistent with the view corridor requirements of ECDC 24.40.040.B.11. The proposed building is 30 feet in height (as measured from two -feet above based flood elevation). These criteria are satisfied. Chapter 24.50 ECDC General Modification Policies and Regulations SSDP and Design Review p. 12 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 224 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ECDC 24.50.010 General Modification Policies ECDC 24.50.010.A.1 Locate and design all new development in a manner that prevents or minimizes the need for shoreline modifications. 16. The proposed development on the east side of Admiral Way is located in an area where no shoreline modifications will be required. Chapter 24.60 ECDC Specific Use Policies and Regulations ECDC 24.60.030 Commercial Development and Light Industrial ECDC 24.60.030.A. Applicability. Commercial development means those uses and facilities that are involved in wholesale or retail trade or business activities. Examples include but are not limited to restaurants, hotels, shops, offices, and recreation facilities. Industry applies to those businesses or uses involved in the production, processing, manufacturing, or fabrication of goods. Warehousing and storage of materials or products is considered part of the industrial process. This is a broad category that mostly applies to the downtown commercial waterfront (CW) where development must also comply with Chapter 16.55 ECDC. Uses and activities associated with commercial development that are identified as separate use activities in this master program, such as boating facilities, piers and docks, utilities, etc., are subject to the regulations established for those uses in addition to the standards for commercial development. The design, layout and operation of certain commercial uses directly affects their classification with regard to whether or not they qualify as water -related or water - enjoyment uses. ECDC 24.60.030.B. Commercial Development and Light Industrial Policies. 1. In securing shoreline locations for commercial and light industrial use, preference should be given first to water -dependent commercial uses, then to water -related, water -enjoyment commercial uses. 2. Restoration of impaired shoreline ecological functions and processes should be encouraged as part of commercial and light industrial development. 3. Commercial and light industrial development should ensure visual compatibility with adjacent noncommercial properties. 4. Commercial and light industrial uses located in the shoreline should provide public access in accordance with constitutional or other legal limitations unless such improvements are demonstrated to be infeasible or present hazards to life and property. SSDP and Design Review p. 13 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 225 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5. Commercial and light industrial development should be encouraged to locate where environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline area can be incorporated. 17. The proposed development is a water -related use consistent with the requirements of the Commercial Waterfront zone requirements in Chapter 16.55 ECDC. The project site does not impact ecological functions and no restoration of impaired ecological functions is required. The development is compatible with other development within the Port of Edmonds property and will not impact visual or physical access to the shoreline area. The project site is not physically adjacent to the shoreline and cannot provide public access to the shoreline. The proposal is consistent with the policies. ECDC 24.60.030.C. Commercial Development and Light Industrial Regulations. 1. Commercial and light industrial uses are allowed subject to the policies and regulations of ECDC 24.40.020 and the specific criteria below: b. Water -related commercial and light industrial uses may not be approved if the use displaces existing water -dependent uses. Prior to approval of water -related commercial uses, the administrator shall review a proposal for design, layout and operation of the use and shall make specific findings that the use qualifies as a water -related use. 18. The proposed marine retail and service use of the building is a water - related use that will not displace any water -dependent uses. The proposed use will be compatible with and provide support to the water -dependent marina use present on the west side of Admiral Way. This criterion is satisfied. 2. Overwater construction of commercial and light industrial uses is prohibited except as follows: a. Only those portions of water -dependent commercial and light industrial uses that require overwater facilities shall be permitted to locate waterward of the ordinary high water mark. b. Non -water -dependent commercial and light industrial uses shall not be allowed over water except in limited instances where they are appurtenant to and necessary in support of water -dependent uses. 19. No overwater construction is proposed with the subject development. ECDC 24.60.030.D. Commercial Development and Light Industrial — Shoreline Area Regulations. 3. Urban Mixed Use H. SSDP and Design Review p. 14 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 226 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 a. Water -oriented commercial and light industrial use and development are permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. Non -water -oriented commercial use and development may be permitted subject to the criteria for such uses in subsection (C)(1)(d) of this section. b. A minimum of 15 foot setback is required from lot lines adjacent to shoreline residential environments. This area must be fully landscaped and include a minimum six-foot high fence or hedge. 20. The proposed development is a water -oriented use. The site is not adjacent to any shoreline residential environments. This criterion is satisfied. ECDC 24.60.080 Transportation and Parking This section describes the requirements for transportation and parking facilities within shoreline jurisdiction. The relevant provisions from this section are related to parking. ECDC 24.60.080.0 Transportation and Parking Regulations 6. Parking facilities are not a water -dependent use and shall only be permitted within the shoreline to support an authorized use where it can be demonstrated that there are no feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline. 7. All uses must provide sufficient off-street parking spaces in order to accommodate the reasonably anticipated number of vehicles that will be coming to the subject property. Specific parking standards for uses are identified in the Chapter 17.50 ECDC, as now or hereafter amended. 8. Parking layouts must be designed efficiently to use the minimum amount of space necessary to provide the required parking and safe and reasonable access. Parking should not be located between the building(s) on the subject property and the shoreline. Exterior parking areas, other than for detached dwelling units, must be attractively landscaped with vegetation that will not obstruct view of the shoreline from adjacent public areas or adjacent public rights -of -way. 21. The parking associated with the development is consistent with Chapter 17.50 ECDC and supports an authorized water -oriented shoreline use. The parking is on the east side of the proposed building away from the street and pedestrian walkway and located as far from Puget Sound as is possible on the subject site. This criterion is satisfied. ECDC 24.60.080.D Transportation and Parking — Shoreline Area Regulations SSDP and Design Review p. 15 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 227 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3.c. Parking Facilities. In the urban mixed use II environment, the 60 foot setback for parking established in ECDC 24.40.090may be reduced by a maximum of 20 feet if a public walkway or publicly accessible open space is provided waterward of the bulkhead. The parking setback may be reduced by one foot for every one foot of public walkway or publicly accessible open space that is provided waterward of the OHWM, to a maximum of 20 feet. The minimum setback for parking facilities shall be no less than 40 feet from the bulkhead. 22. The parking area is located more than 60 feet from Puget Sound and the Willow Creek outlet on the east side of the railroad right-of-way. This criterion is satisfied. Design Review 23. Design review compliance has already been addressed in detail in the staff recommendation to the Architectural Design Board, att. 17 to the staff report. In the absence of any error in the staff report and decision of the ADB, there is no need for the Hearing Examiner to add to or modify upon the detailed and technical findings and conclusions of the staff report and ADB. The findings and conclusions of the staff report and ADB as detailed in att. 17 and 18 to the staff report are adopted by this decision as if set forth in full. DECISION All shoreline substantial development criteria and design review criteria are met. The shoreline substantial development permit (PLN20170029) and design review (PLN20170030) are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. All mechanical equipment and other utility hardware on the roof, grounds, or buildings shall be screened to mitigate view impacts from street level. Screening could include the use of architectural elements, landscaping and/or fencing. 2. Street trees shall be a minimum of 3 inches in caliper. Species, location and spacing of the street trees will be determined during civil plan review with the building permit application. 3. If a trash/recycling collection area is added to the development site, it should be provided in a gated trash enclosure to screen view of the waste and recycling containers. 4. The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report during the building permit review to ensure the structure is designed and constructed to standards related to liquefaction seismic hazards. SSDP and Design Review p. 16 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 228 1 5.1.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5. The applicant shall install a bench on the west side of the proposed development along the pedestrian walkway. 6. The building shall be designed to meet the flood hazard requirements of ECDC 19.00.025.P. Dated this 9th day of November 2017. Plur A. Ulbrechts City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices A party of record may submit a written appeal of a Type III-B decision within 14 days of the date of issuance of the decision. The appeal will be heard at a closed record review before the City Council according to the requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.07. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. SSDP and Design Review p. 17 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Attachment 14 Packet Pg. 229 1 5.2 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2021 PLN2019-0055 Sunde Townhomes: The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development with associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Staff Lead: Michele Q. Szafran Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History See narrative Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions. Narrative The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development with associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Each unit will contain a parking garage for one parking space and additional surface parking has been provided. Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010, proposed developments that require a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination (those that are not categorically exempt from SEPA) are reviewed by the ADB in a public hearing. According to ECDC 20.01.003, review by the ADB in a public hearing format is a Type III -A decision, which is appealable to the City Council. Attachments: Staff Report & Attachments Packet Pg. 230 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Sunde Townhomes File Number: PLN2019-0055 Date of Report: May 25, 2021 Staff Contact: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Public Hearing: Wednesday —June 2, 2021 at 7:00 P.M. Due to COVID-19, a virtual public hearing will be held via Zoom meeting The Zoom meeting may be joined at: https://zoom.us/I/95360544929?pwd=ZmdOREFORkE3RkRaeVdBRmpkNUxMZz09 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password: 818962 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development with associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Each unit will contain a parking garage for one parking space and additional surface parking has been provided (Attachments 1— 3). II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner/Applicant: Thor Sunde 2. Contact: Lee Michaelis, AICP, Puget Sound Planning 3. Tax Parcel Number: 00463300700302 4. Location: 8629 2381h ST. SW, Edmonds WA 98026 (Attachment 7) 5. Size: The subject property contains 10,836 square feet. Packet Pg. 231 6. Zoning: The subject property is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM — 1.5) with a maximum density of one dwelling unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area. 7. Existing Use: There is currently a single family structure on the property. 8. Proposed Use: The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development and associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Each unit will contain a parking garage for one parking space and additional surface parking has been provided 9. Process: Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.010, proposed developments that require a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination (those that are not categorically exempt from SEPA) are reviewed by the ADB in a public hearing. According to ECDC 20.01.003, review by the ADB in a public hearing format is a Type III -A decision, which is appealable to the City Council. III. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Review under SEPA is required for this project because the project exceeds four (4) multifamily residential units. The applicant submitted a SEPA Checklist for the project which is included in Attachment 6. The City of Edmonds determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and issued SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance on November 26, 2019 (Attachment 6). The City has not received appeals of the SEPA determination. IV. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS A "Notice of Application and SEPA Threshold Determination" was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on November 26, 2019. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. See Attachment 6 for public notice documentation regarding the Notice of Application and SEPA determination. The "Notice of Public Hearing" was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on May 19, 2021. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. See Attachment 11 for public notice documentation regarding the Notice of Public Hearing. The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.03 (Public Notice). A written comment has been received on the proposal by Paul Svenkerud of the Fir Grove HOA. Svenkerud had expressed concern regarding the right to access the existing driveway along the western property boundary (Attachment 16). Staff Response: A Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) had been approved and recorded in 2012 under (AF# 201211205001), but deeds had not been recorded following the approved Page 2 of 15 Packet Pg. 232 2012 LLA. This concern had been brought to the attention of the applicant and the applicant had been asked to resolve the 2012 LLA. The applicant/property owner has worked with the Fir Grove HOA to obtain signatures to revoke the 2012 LLA and thus retain the previous LLA recorded under AF#200612275209 along with the declaration of easement recorded under AF#200701050551, (Attachment 5). Per the attached documents the development will have access to the site via the existing driveway along the western property boundary off of 238th St. SW. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed by South County Fire, City of Edmonds Public Works, Engineering and Building Divisions of the Development Services Department. The Building Division had no comments at this time. Compliance with all applicable building codes will be reviewed under the building permit application. (Attachment 12). South County Fire provided comments regarding Fire land Markings to conform to Fire Lane marking standards (Attachment 13). Fire had no additional comments. Compliance will be further reviewed with a building permit application. The Public Works -Recycling Coordinator commented that a trash enclosure is not required for this project. However, space must be indicated in each garage for storage of individual waste containers, and the minimum footprint shall be 13 square feet (Attachment 14). The plans adequately show the designated garage storage area. The Engineering Division noted that the proposal is consistent with Title 18 ECDC and the City's Engineering Standards (Attachment 15). Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with any future building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. The City's stormwater engineer provided project feasibility approval based on the civil plan set received on December 15, 2020 (Attachment 2 & 4). The applicant provided a revised civil plan set on April 27, 2021 and it has been confirmed that the minor revision (sidewalk widening for bus stop) does not change the previous feasibility approval. The subject property benefits from an ingress, egress, and utilities easement (AFN200701050551) (Attachment 5). V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is "Edmonds Way Corridor." The current project is subject to General Design Review as outlined in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. One of the findings required by ECDC 20.11.020 is that the proposal is consistent with the design guidelines provided in the Urban Design Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Below is a detailed analysis on how the proposal complies with the goals and objectives for site design, building form, and building facade contained in the Comprehensive Plan's Urban Design Chapter. Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Objectives Page 3 of 15 Packet Pg. 233 Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. Staff Findings: The subject property currently provides an access along the eastern property boundary directly off of 238t" St. SW which will be eliminated with this development proposal. The proposed townhomes will be accessed via the existing easement along the west side of the property boundary and thus will reduce the current number of access points directly off of 238th St. SW. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. Staff Findings: The subject property is located on the north side of 238t" St. SW and parking is provided off of the east side of the existing access easement and thus the proposal locates the building as close to the front of the site as possible while providing parking to the side of the structure. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. Staff Findings: There is no need to integrate access between adjacent developments since this is a private residential development which is adjacent to other private residential developments on all sides. There is an existing bus stop just south of the southern property boundary and other bus stops are within easy walking distance of the site (approximately 600 feet). A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. Staff Findings: Because this is a small residential development, creating a lively pedestrian environment is not a high priority. Additional landscaping along 238t" St. SW. Will improve the appearance of the site at the street edge. The entries to each of the residential units are on the west side of the buildings. These entries are recessed, which may not provide sufficient space for gathering, but will provide covered entries to each of the units Page 4 of 15 Packet Pg. 234 A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. Staff Findings: Project meets the setbacks requirements for the zone and landscaping is provided within and around the perimeter of the development consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. Staff Findings: There are no specific open space requirements for the RM-1.5 zone and none is proposed with this development; however, the perimeter of the property will be landscaped. While this landscaping will enhance the visual attributes of the site, they are not intended to provide places for interaction, play, seating or other activities. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. Staff Findings: The project uses a mix of traditional materials arranged in a manner responsive to the characteristics of the site. Both of the buildings have a similar design and color scheme. One building contains 2-units and the other building contains 3-units. The building height along with the pedestrian paths will help with way -finding. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. Staff Findings: Residents will enter their units through individual main entry doors, which are recessed with covered entries to each unit. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians — including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces — to support activity and security. Staff Findings: Refer to Attachment 2 for location of proposed lighting on the building. Lights will be provided adjacent to the front doors to each unit and adjacent to each garage door, the light from these fixtures should be directed down onto the site. In order to ensure that the exterior lighting does not spill off -site, a condition of approval has been added requiring all exterior lighting to be shielded in order to avoid off -site spillage. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city's emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. Staff Findings: No signage proposed at this time. Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 235 A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. Staff Findings: Trash and recycling will be provided within individual garages, so no trash enclosure is proposed (Attachment 2; sheet 3 of 7). No exterior mechanical equipment is proposed at this time, but utilities should be screened by landscaping which has been added as a recommended condition of approval. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms — such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees — into site design whenever possible. Staff Findings: The site contains existing trees and per the applicant the trees along the eastern property boundary are to be retained and supplemented to include Type III landscaping (Attachment 9 and 2). Planting additional trees at this time may not be feasible along the eastern property boundary due to the proximity of the existing vegetation. As a condition, if the trees are to be removed then replacement consistent with Type III landscaping will be required. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Staff Findings: Landscaping is provided consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. See the discussion on landscaping in Section 6.D below. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. Staff Findings: The proposed building offers an arrangement of forms, rooflines, windows and other elements that is unique to these buildings which is not repetitive or monotonous. A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. Staff Findings: Bulk and mass of the buildings are reduced through use of materials, colors, and building form, subdividing the buildings both vertically and horizontally. Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 236 A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. Staff Findings: The proposed buildings provide varied roof pitches and projections, which help identify the separate units within the building and provide modulation to the overall roof form. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. Staff Findings: The proposed buildings provide variation in colors, materials and projections that help break of the masses of the buildings both vertically and horizontally. Design Objectives for Building Facade. Building facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building — the portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place — is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Building Facade Design. Encourage building fagades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. Staff Findings: The building uses an attractive mix of materials (Attachment 2). The recessed pedestrian entries provides a clear location for pedestrians to enter the building. The overall theme of the development has a unified residential appearance. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a facade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. Staff Findings: There are windows of various shapes and sizes on all sides of the building, which help to denote different functional elements of the building (Attachment 2). A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building fagades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in facade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. Staff Findings: As mentioned above, there is good variety in facade materials and design elements on all sides of the building. VI. DEVELOPMENT CODE A. Chapter 16.30 ECDC - Multi -Family Residential Zone: The subject property is located with the Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5) zone and subject to the development standards of Chapter 16.30 ECDC. Page 7 of 15 Packet Pg. 237 ECDC 16.30.010 Uses Staff Findings: Multiple dwellings is a permitted primary use pursuant to ECDC 16.30.010.A.1, so the proposed development is consistent with the allowed uses of the RM1.5 zone. ECDC 16.30.030 Development Standards Minimum Lot Area Minimum Minimum Minimum Zone per Street Side Rear Maximum Maximum Dwelling Height Coverage Setback Setback Setback Unit (Sq. Ft.) RM-1.5 1,500 15' 10, 15' 25" 45% 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. Staff Findings — Density: The subject property contains 10,836 square feet of lot area. With a density of one dwelling unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area, a maximum of 7 dwelling units may be constructed. The proposal is for 5 dwelling units within two separate structures to include a duplex and a triplex, so the proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the RM-1.5 zone. Staff Findings — Setbacks: As shown on Attachment 2, Sheet A.1, because the site is zoned RM-1.5, the proposed structure must be located at least 15 feet from the south property line (street setback), 10 feet from the east and west property lines (side setbacks), and 15 feet from the north property line (rear setback). Eaves may project into the minimum required setbacks as "similar minor improvements" by no more than 30" as allowed by ECDC 16.30.040.C.1. The proposed building and related features appear to meet the minimum setback requirements for the RM-1.5 zone. Staff Findings — Height: The maximum allowed height for the proposed structure is limited to 25 feet and 30 feet with a slope of 4 in 12 inches or greater. The proposed structure appears to have been designed to comply with the height requirements of the RM-1.5 zone as it is shown as being 25 feet above average original grade to the roof line with an additional five feet above the height limit for a sloped roof of 4 in 12 inches or greater Attachment 2, Sheet A.1 and sheet 1 of 7. Both buildings include a roof pitch of 6:12 but the duplex is proposed just below 25 feet from average original grade to the roof line. The triplex provides a roof pitch of 6:12 above 2S feet and is less than 30 feet in height from average grade. The proposal is consistent with the height requirements of the RM-1.5 zone. Staff Findings — Coverage: ECDC 21.15.110 defines coverage as the total ground coverage of all buildings or structures on a site measured from the outside of external walls or supporting members or from a point two and one-half feet in from the outside edge of a cantilevered roof, whichever covers the greatest area. The application notes Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 238 a building ground coverage of 4,487 square feet for a coverage of 41% of the 10,836 square foot lot. The proposal is consistent with the coverage requirements of the RM-1.5 zone. B. ECDC 17.50.020 — Off -Street Parking Regulations Off-street parking requirements for multifamily developments are detailed in the table in ECDC 17.50.020.A.1.b. The table below provides the parking requirements of ECDC 17.50.020.A.1.b along with the number of units of each dwelling unit type and the number of required parking spaces. Type of multiple Required parking Number of units Number of dwelling unit spaces per in proposal parking spaces dwelling unit required 2 bedrooms 1.8 5 9 Total Spaces Required 9 The proposal provides 14 parking spaces. Five (5) parking spaces are proposed within the garage for each unit and nine (9) parking spaces are provided along the western property boundary adjacent to the access easement. Five (5) of the spaces are proposed to be compact size. Pursuant to ECDC 18.95.020 (Parking Lot Construction Requirements), reduced size parking stalls may be allowed if demonstrated that there is enough area to provide all the required stalls at full size and no more than 50% of the parking spaces may be reduced size. The applicant has demonstrated there is enough area to provide all the required parking spaces at full size and less than 50% of the stalls are proposed at reduced size. The proposal is consistent with the off-street parking requirements of Chapter 17.50 ECDC (Attachment 2, Sheet A.1). C. Chapter 20.11 ECDC — General Design Review ECDC 20.11.010 requires the ADB to review general design review applications that trigger SEPA. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the criteria for Building Design and Site Treatment that must be met. ECDC 20.11.030.A Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets; Staff Findings: A variety of materials and forms are used which creates a building harmonious in scale, line and mass within the development and which will integrate well with the surrounding area. Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 239 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area, Staff Findings: The proposed colors scheme avoids excessive brilliance or brightness (Attachment 3). 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level, Staff Findings: No exterior mechanical equipment is proposed according to the associated plans, however any exterior equipment should be screened by the proposed landscaping. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. a. In multifamily (RM) or commercial zones, selections from among the following or similar features are appropriate for dealing with this criterion: i. Windows with architectural fenestration; ii. Multiple rooflines or forms; iii. Architecturally detailed entries; iv. Appropriate landscaping; v. The use of multiple materials; Staff Findings: The proposed building provides variation in materials and projecting roof forms that help break up the bulk of the building both vertically and horizontally. Additionally, site landscaping helps break up massing of the building as well (Attachment 2). 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. Staff Findings: The proposed development does not currently propose any signage. Any signage will be reviewed under a subsequent building permit application. ECDC 20.11.030.B Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized to protect natural resources, limit disturbance of native soils, and encourage low impact development. Staff Findings: The site currently contains a single family structure and a shed along with an existing driveway which will be demolished. The property slopes up slightly from 238t" St. SW, in general the proposal includes minimal grading to the site. The Page 10 of 15 Packet Pg. 240 site will be re -landscaped after redevelopment is complete as shown in Attachment 2 Sheet L-1. There will be an increase in impervious surfaces, but not in excess of what would be expected with the redevelopment of an underutilized multifamily -zoned parcel. All stormwater will be managed in accordance with the City's stormwater codes. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. Staff Findings: Landscaping consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC are being provided with the development. See the discussion on landscaping requirements in Section D below. 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. Staff Findings: With the combination of proposed landscaping and retention of some of the existing vegetation the proposal will be consistent with Chapter 20.13 ECDC and will provide buffers from surrounding properties. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. Staff Findings: Landscaping adjacent to the parking spaces located adjacent to the northern property boundary should provide curbing to protect the landscaping, which has been added as a recommended condition. S. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. Staff Findings: Trash and recycling will be provided within individual garages, so no trash enclosure is proposed. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. Staff Findings: Plantings will consist of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs that will provide year-round screening and interest (Attachment 2, Sheet L-1). 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. Staff Findings: Not applicable. 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Staff Findings: Adequate site lighting is provided via wall mounted lights that will illuminate the entry way to the units. Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 241 ECDC 20.11.030(C) Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Staff Findings: The proposed building is not a community facility. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Staff Findings: No specific street furniture is proposed or required. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the design standards of ECDC 20.11.030. D. Chapter 20.13 ECDC — Landscape Requirements Chapter 20.13 ECDC contains specific landscaping requirements for new developments, which the ADB and Hearing Examiner are permitted to interpret and modify according to ECDC 20.13.000. The subject site is zoned RM-1.5 and all immediately adjacent properties are also zoned RM-1.5. Type III landscaping is appropriate along all property boundaries of the site. Plant sizes shown meet or exceed the requirements in ECDC 20.13.015. ECDC 20.13.030 provides the requirements for each landscaping type. Per ECDC 20.13.000 the applicant has requested a landscape modification along the western property boundary which appears to be consistent with the purposes found in ECDC 20.10.000, the request is attached as attachment 10. Type 111 Landscaping. Type 111 landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center; and 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years; or 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted: a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. Page 12 of 15 Packet Pg. 242 c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. Staff Findings: The landscaping shown on Attachment 2; Sheet L-1 and per the landscape modification request for the western property boundary (attachment 10), staff finds that the landscaping satisfies the intent of the Type III standards for softening the appearance of the building elevations. Along the eastern property boundary there are large trees that are proposed to be retained, and thus planting additional trees at this time is not feasible due to the proximity of the existing vegetation. Along the north, south and eastern property boundaries, no more than half of the trees in the Type III landscaped areas are deciduous, and with the combination of the proposed and existing trees the spacing requirements can be met of not more than 30 feet on center which is consistent with the Type III landscaping requirements. Various shrubs and groundcover are utilized throughout these areas consistent with the minimum size and maximum spacing requirements of ECDC 20.13.015 which provides additional screening and visual interest to the site. Staff feels that the landscaping for the project is consistent with the landscaping design requirements of ECDC 20.13. VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of proposed development applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments within this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for the proposed development under file number PLN2019-0055 with the following motion and recommended conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICIES OF ECDC 20.10, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED MULTI- FAMILY HOMES WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IS UP TO THE APPLICANT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH VARIOUS PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THESE CODES. 2. STAFF WILL VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPOSAL WITH ALL RELEVANT CODES AND LAND USE PERMIT CONDITIONS THROUGH REVIEW OF BUILDING AND ENGINEERING PERMITS. MINOR CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED BY STAFF AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT WITHOUT FURTHER DESIGN REVIEW BY THE BOARD AS LONG AS THE DESIGN IS SUBSTANTIALLY �9I►�Il�eri�i�:Ie�i77[elhleA�'/e � � : �l�l� Page 13 of 15 Packet Pg. 243 3. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM THE STREET LEVEL. 4. LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED WITH CURBING FOR THE PARKING SPACES ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. 5. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING MUST BE SHIELDED IN ORDER TO AVOID OFF -SITE SPILLAGE. VIII. APPEALS IX. X. According to ECDC 20.01.003.E and 20.06.150, Type III -A decisions are not administratively appealable but rather subject to LUPA appeal at Snohomish County superior court pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW. LAPSE OF APPROVAL According to ECDC 20.11.050.A, unless the owner submits a fully completed building permit application necessary to bring about the approved alterations, or, if no building permit application is required, substantially commences the use allowed within 18 months from the date of approval, ADB or hearing examiner approval shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files a fully completed application for an extension of time prior to the expiration date. For the purposes of this section the date of approval shall be the date on which the ADB's or hearing examiner's minutes or other method of conveying the final written decision of the ADB or hearing examiner as adopted are mailed to the applicant. In the event of appeal, the date of approval shall be the date on which a final decision is entered by the city council or court of competent jurisdiction. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121— 51h Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Puget Sound Planning Attn: Lee Michaelis 5005 200th St. SW., Suite 101 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Thor Sunde 24225 85th Ave. SE. Woodinville, WA 98072 Fir Grove HOA Attn: Paul Svenkerud firgrovecondos@gmail.com Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 244 XI. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application, Cover Letter & Transportation 2. Plan Set, Landscape Plan & Lighting Details 3. Color Elevations 4. Drainage Report 5. BLA Revocation Documents 6. Notice of Application & SEPA documents 7. Zoning and Vicinity Map 8. Critical Area Determination 9. Applicant Response Letter 5-19-20 10. Applicant Response Letter 4-20-21 11. Notice of Public Hearing 12. Building Division Comments 13. Fire District Comments 14. Public Works Trash Collection Comments 15. Engineering Division Memo of Consistency 16. Public Comment email Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 245 City of Edmonds Land Use Application ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT :1 HOME OCCUPATION FORMAL SUBDIVISION SHORT SUBDIVISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -1 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ STREET VACATION 11 REZONE C SHORELINE PERMIT C VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION E OTHER: • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 8629 238th St SW PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Sunde Townhomes PROPERTY OWNER Thor Sunde ADDRESS 24225 85th Ave SE Woodinville, WA 98072 E-MAIL sunderentals@gmail.com PHONE # (425) 770-0844 FAX # TAx ACCOUNT # 00463300700302 SEC. 31 TWP. 27 RNG. 04 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) (see attached) DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT. MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) (see attached) APPLICANT Thor Sunde PHONE # (425) 770-0844 ADDRESS 24225 85th Ave SE Woodinville, WA 98072 E-MAIL sunderentals@gmail.com FAX # CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Lee A. Michaelis, AICP Puget Sound Planning PHONE # (206) 250-7952 ADDRESS 5005 200th St SW, Suit 101 Lynnwood, WA 98036 E-MAIL lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Z Property Owner's Authorization I, certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspeecction-anndd post attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application Page 1 of I ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 246 Receive,) OCT 15 -�?1q DEVELOP)WENT sir vrcFs Cr�t1R���0 SUNDE TOWNHOMES ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 8629 2398TH ST SW Project Description & Proposed Use The proposed application seeks Architectural Design Review approval for the construction of 5 townhouse units comprised of a duplex on the north portion of the property and a triplex on the south portion of the property. The project also includes the construction of parking and driveways for 9 cars, the installation of water, sewer, and storm for each of the units and an off -site driveway, to the west, that connects to 238th St. $W. The property currently has a one-story single-family residence approximately 1,216 square feet in area that was constructed in 1942, The residence also has a 338 square foot attached garage. Access to the residence is from 238th St SW. All structures will be removed as part of the proposal. This project obtained similar approval in March of 2008, however the approval expired, and the project was never completed. Nothing has changed since initial approval. Project Compilance with the Comprehensive Plan and Edmonds Community Development Code The Comprehensive Plan designation for this site is "Edmonds Way Corridor", which is further defined by Commercial Development Goal E, on Page 73 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. It states: "This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate 5. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while smalbscale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities." The following are the sub goals of the Edmonds Way Corridor and how the project complies with these goals: "E.1 Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion." RESPONSE: The proposed project is multiple family at a density that complies with the underlying zone and at s scale that meets the height requirements of the underlying zone and compatible with the surrounding condominium and apartment complexes. The project will share an access drive with the Fir Grove Townhomes to the north. Consolidating access points will assist in reducing traffic congestion. "E.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development." RESPONSE: The access driveway, individual driveways, and walkways will provide pedestrian circulation from each unit to 238th ST SW. There is an existing bus stop along the properties frontage that provides connection to Highway 99 and Edmonds Way whether regional transportation routes are located. 5005 200t" Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www,pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 247 "E.3 Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative." RESPONSE The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway to the west and share it with the Fir Grove Townhomes. No direct access to SR104 is proposed, nor is the access point from a residential street. "E.4 Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible." RESPONSE: The project is not adjacent to any single-family neighborhoods nor are the adjacent uses incompatible with the proposed development. This property is located in the Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) zone and is subject to the requirements of ECDC 16,30, The purpose of the RM zones is to reserve and. regulate areas for a variety of housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in the single-family residential zones, while still maintaining a residential environment. The proposal is to construct townhouses which are regulated as multiple family dwelling in the City of Edmonds and are permitted uses in the RM-1.5 zone. This zone requires that there is a minimum of 1,500 square feet of lot area for each unit proposed. The subject property is 10,836 square feet in area, which would allow 7 dwelling units. The project is only proposing 5 units. The proposal provides the following setbacks as allowed by ECDC 16.30,030: Fifteen -foot setback from the south and north property lines and 10 feet from the east and west property lines. The proposed structures will not exceed the allowable 30-foot height limit as allowed by Table 16.30.030 Footnote 1. The lot coverage for the project will be 32 percent as calculated on the site plan submitted for this project. The project is subject to the parking requirements found in ECDC 17,50. Based on 5 units with 2-bedrooms per unit, 9 parking stalls are required (5 units X 1.8 stalls per unit). Fourteen stalls are proposed which include driveway and garage parking stalls. The parking configuration is shown on the site plan. The following analysis is provided to shown compliance with the General Design Review Criteria found in ECDC 20.11.030: A. Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets; RESPONSE: Material examples have been provided on the architectural elevations for review and approval 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area; RESPONSE: Colors will be subdued and not be excessive or bright. 5005 2001h Street Southwest, Suite 101-5 I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundpianning,corn I info a@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 248 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level; RESPONSE: No mechanical equipment is proposed on the roof and ground level equipment will be screened and not visible from the street. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. RESPONSE: No unbroken building elevations are in view from the public right of way. 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. RESPONSE: No signs are proposed as part of this project B. Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized to protect natural resources, limit disturbance of native soils, and encourage low impact development. RESPONSE: Grading has been minimized with the use of retaining walls, to step the property down similar to the natural slope of the property. Vegetation removal is needed to construct the proposed building and install needed utilities. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. RESPONSE: See Landscape Plan for site treatment 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. RESPONSE See Landscape Plan for site treatment 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. RESPONSE The landscaping east of proposed parking spaces 1 and 2 will be protected by extruded curbing. 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. RESPONSE: Each unit will store garbage and recycle cans inside the individual garages, there are no service areas proposed on the site. 5005 200th Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 249 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. RESPONSE: Screening on the north and south sides of the property consists of evergreen plant materials. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. RESPONSE: Other than proposed driveways and back patios, the site will be covered in living vegetation or soft material such as bark, and mulch. 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. RESPONSE: Exterior lighting consists of sconce wall lighting located at the entryways and garages. The lighting will be directed downward to avoid light "spilling" or glaring off -site. 5005 200th Street Southwest, Suite 101-8 1 Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 250 GTCGibson Traffic Consultants, lnc. To: Hannah Philbrick, Pup -et Sound Planning From: Matthew Palmer, PE Project: Sunde Townhomes, GTC #18-142 �'�s�1y��R RIry�ES City of Edmonds Trip Generation and Mitigation Date: June 8, 2018 This memorandum summarizes the trip generation and mitigation analysis for the proposed Sunde Townhomes development which has a current zoning of RM-1.5 which would allows one unit per 1,500 SF. The site is located at 8629 238th Street SW in the City of Edmonds. The site location is shown in Figure 1 in the attachments. The development proposes to remove the existing single- family home and replace it with 5 townhouse units. Parking for 14 vehicles will be provided on site including garage parking. Trip Generation Trip generation for the development is based on data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition (2017), LUC 220, Multifamily (Low -Rise) and LUC 210, Single -Family Detached. The ADT, AM, and PM peak -hour trip generation is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Trip Generation Summary Land Use Average AM Peak -Hour Trips PM Peak -Hour Trips Units Daily Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Trips Multi -Family Low -Rise 5 36.60 0.53 1.77 2.30 1.76 1.04 2.80 Single -Family _1 -9.44 -0.19 -0.55 -0.74 -0.62 -0.37 -0.99 emoved) Removed) (R Net New 4 28 0.34 1.22 1.56 1.14 0.67 1.81 The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue • Suite B • Everett, WA 98201 Tel: 425-339-8266 • Fax: 425-258-2922 • E-mail: info@gibsontraffic.com Packet Pg. 251 Sunde Townhomes Trip Generation & Mitigation Memo Mitigation Fees The applicable traffic mitigation fees are from City of Edmonds Code Section 3.36.125. The 2017 Impact Fee Rate for the new townhouses is $1,525.81 per unit; while credit for the removed single- family home is based on the 2004 Impact Fee Rate as the previous use was permitted before 9/12/2004. Therefore, the credit will be $840.72 for the single-family home and the net new mitigation fees will be $6,788.33. The traffic mitigation fee calculation for the Sunde Townhomes development if the change in use is approved is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Traffic Mitigation Fee Calculation Land Use Units Cost per Total Unit Condominium 5 Units $1,525.81 $7,629.05 Single -Family -1 Unit $840.72 -$840.72 House Total --- --- $6,788.33 Access Analysis The development will utilize the existing access onto 2381h Street SW located approximately 250 feet east of SR-104 to access the existing road network and the driveway for the existing single- family house will be removed. 238th Street SW is a minor arterial street with one lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 mph. There is intermittent sections of curb, gutter and sidewalk along both the north and south sides of the road. The City of Edmonds has a sight distance requirement of 300 feet for a posted speed limit of 30 mph at a private road connection. The development will have over 400 feet of clear sight distance to the east and approximately 250 feet of sight distance to the intersection of SR-104 to the west and 105 feet of sight distance to the channelized right turn from SR-104 to the west with frontage improvements along the site frontage. Due to vehicles having to slow down to 10-15 mph for right-turns/15 mph for left -turns) to make the turns onto 238th Street SW from the SR-104 intersection and the uphill grade from the intersection to the site access would reduce the stopping sight distance down to 80 feet per AASHTO. Summary/Conclusions The change in use of the site would generate 1.81 new PM peak hour trips. The site will remove the driveway for the existing single-family house and utilize the existing access point to the west, reducing the number of access points to 238th Street SW and is not be anticipated to impact any critical intersection with 10 new PM peak- hour trips; therefore, off -site mitigation should not be required. With the credit for the previously permitted uses the traffic mitigation fee for the 5 townhouses with the change in use would be $6,788.33. Attachments (A-1 to A-14) Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. June 2018 info@gibsontraffic.com 2 GTC #18-142 Packet Pg. 252 244TH ST W (NW 205TH Sl GIBSONTRAFFIC CONSULTANTS LEGEND 8629 238TH STREET SW PROJECT SITE CITY OF EDMONDS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC #18-142 FIGURE 1 SITE VICINITY MAP Packet Pg. 253 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 29 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 168 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45 - 10.97 1.31 Data Plot and Equation 5,000 4,000 w 3,000 .CL 2,000 1,000 a x x x x x x X x YX 6 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R2= 0.96 Trip Generation Manual, 1 Oth Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers I Packet Pg. 254 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban I ItUlieS: JO Numiluer of Q U -tic. Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 199 Directional Distribution: 23% entering, 77% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0,46 0.18 - 014 012 1 Data Plot and Equation 300 U) W 200 F- x x X x >�K x x x x X x x x 100 X XX X x x 200 4UU X = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site - Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.95 Ln(X) - 0.51 Trip Generation Manual, 1 Oth Edition e Institute of Transportation Engineers buu Average Rate R2= 0.90 x O E 0 0 Cn In 9 Q cm z —J E U W 0 M Cn E I Packet Pg. 255 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Nu„ber of Studies: rZ v Avg. Nurn. of Dwelling Units: 187 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate mange of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18 - 1.25 0.16 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 C c W a 300 I I H 200 100 x x x .x x xx x x , x x x x_ x 200 400 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 Rz= 0.86 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition r Institute of Transportation Engineers Packet Pg. 256 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 159 Avg. Num. of DwellingUnits: 264 Directional Distribution: 50% enterinq, 50% eXitinq renicie i rip Veneration per uweiiing unit Average Pate Range of Dates Standard Deviation 9.44 4.61 - 19.39 2.10 Data Plot and Equation x 20,000 d B f x fr 15.000 x / o ! c r w x 10,000 B / x B� x 5,000 / x 00 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 X = Number of Dwelling Units x Study Site Fitted Curve _ - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 Ry 0.95 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers as E 0 z c 3 0 I— m c 3 LO LO 0 O 0) 0 N Z J n_ U) c E V Q 06�1 L 0 CL N� I.L N c d E t v tv .r a Packet Pg. 257 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Setting/Location: Number of Studies: Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: Dwelling Units Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. General Urban/Suburban 1730 219 25% entering, 75% exiting ✓ehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average mate Range of Dates Standard Deviation 0.74 OM - 2.27 0.27 Data Plot and Equation 2,000 ' d d X J s rr r` rd 1,500 X r rr d c w X a H' 1,000 r .r r` X`r X y{ 500 X X X 00 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 X = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.71(X) + 4.80 Ry 0.89 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Q Packet Pg. 258 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Numbor of Studies: 190 Avg. glum. of Dwelling Units: 242 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Fehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.99 0.44-2.98 0.31 Data Plot and Equation 2,500 2,000 0 '0 C W CL 1,500 of 1,000 500 00, x X z x x XXI I x I x x x 500 1.000 1.500 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site - Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.96 Ln(X) + 0.20 2.000 2.500 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Average Rate R2= 0.92 as E 0 0 F_ LO LO Q 9 M 04 z _J IL U) E U M 06 r_ 0 CL tY U M 3,000 I Packet Pg. 259 8629 238th Street SW GTC #18-142 Trip Generation for: Weekday (a.k.a.): Average Weekday Daily Trips (AWDT) m E 0 3 0 a� 3 Cn u7 O 0 o� 0 N NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE Z J IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS a TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINKNEW PASS -BY DIVERTED NEW Gross Trips Internal Crossover LINK ITE % of Trips % of % of LAND USES VARIABLE LU Trip % % In+Out Gross In+Out In+Out Ext. In+Out Ext. In+Out In+Out In Out In Out In Out Rate IN OUT (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) code Trips (Total) Trips Trips Multi -Family (Low -Rise) 5 units 220 7.32 50% 50% 36.60 0% 0.00 36.60 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 36.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.30 18.30 Single -Family Detached (Removed) -1 units 210 9.44 50% 50% -9.44 0% 0.00 -9.44 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 -9.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.16 0.00 27.16 0.00 0.00 27.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00L��j �4.7�2Totals .5 El 00 Packet Pg. 260 IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS DIVERTED Internal Gross Trips TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW PASS -BY NEW Crossover LINK ITE % of Trips % of % of Trip % % In+Out In+Out In+Out In+Out In+Out LAND USES VARIABLE LU Gross In+Out Ext' Ext. In Out In Out In Out Rate IN OUT (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) code Trips (Total) Trips Trips Multi -Family (Low -Rise) 5 units 220 1 0.46 23% 77% 2.30 1 0% 0.00 2.30 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 1 2.30 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.001 0.53 1 1.77 Single -Family Detached (Removed) -1 units 210 0.74 25% 75% -0.74 1 0% 0.00 -0.74 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 11 -0.74 0.00 O..00J 0.00 0.00 -0.19 -0.55 Totals 1.56 1 1 0.00 1 1.56 0.00 0.00 1.56 0.00 1 0.00 110.00 1 0.0011 0.34 1.22 8629 238th Street SW GTC #18-142 m E 0 3 0 a� 3 Cn in Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 7 and 9 AM c (a.k.a.): Weekday AM Peak Hour N 0 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE Z J a a `O Packet Pg. 261 8629 238th Street SW GTC #18-142 m E 0 3 O a� 3 Cn LO u7 Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 4 and 6 PM c (a.k.a.): Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 N NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE Z J IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW PASS -BY DIVERTED NEW Gross Trips Internal Crossover LINK ITE % of Trips % of % of Trip % % In+Out In+Out In+Out In+Out In+Out LAND USES VARIABLE LU Gross In+Out Ext. Ext. In Out In Out In Out Rate IN OUT Total ( ) (Total) ) i(Total) (Total) Total (Total) code Trips (Total) Trips Trips Multi -Family (Low -Rise) 5 units 220 0.56 63% 37% 2.80 0% 0.00 2.80 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.76 1.04 Single -Family Detached (Removed) -1 units 210 0.99 63% 37% -0.99 0% 0.00 -0.99 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 -0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.62 -0.37 Totals 1.81 0.00 1.81 0.00 0.00 1.81 0.00 1 0.00 10.00 L0011 1.14 1 0.67 a Y Packet Pg. 262 APPENDIX A ��► r� 1�, Page .1 of 2 t Transportation Impact Analysis Worksheet b;F,H)�i11 f INN : E,, t_C}PIME=N NG I N E E 9 1 N G ►'a10N sefnie N P: 425771,0)20 Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Name Street/Mailing Address City Telephone: Sunde Townhomes Applicant Contact Person: Name Street/Mailing Address State Zip City State Zip Telephone: Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. Matt Palmer Firm Name Contact Name Telephone: 425-339-8266 E-mail: mattpLa)gibsontraffic.com 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: 8629 238th Street SW b. Specify existing land use: 1 Single-family home a vicinity map and site plan.) c. Specify proposed type and size of development: 5 Townhouses (# of residential units and/or square footage gf'building) d. Date construction will begin and be completed: Completed 2019/2020 e. Define proposed access locations: Will utilize the existing driveway on 238th Street SW located approx. 250 feet east of SR-104. N a� 0 z _ 0 a� _ Cn In u� 0 0 T 0 N z J a _ a� E z U 0 a 0 a a� 0 Cn m E 0 a Packet Pg. 263 APPENDIX A Page 2 of 2 f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: The development will have over 400 feet to the east and approximately 250 feet to the intersection to the west. 2. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts, Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the attached Impact Fee Rate Tables and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.92.120 impact fee shall be used. ITE Land Use Category Per Unit Fee Rate *Note: Values taken from "2017-2019 - Impact Fee New Use LUC 230, Condominium* $ 1,525.91 X Rate Table" Prior Use LUC, 210, Single -Family $ X ** 840.72 **Note: Values House Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfp, etc. 5 Fee $ 7,629.1 taken from 2004 - Impact Fee New Use Fee: $ 7,629.05 - Prior Use Fee: $ 840.72 = $ 6,788.33 r Rate" 11 NEW DEVELOPMENT ITE Land Use Category I Per Unit Fee Rate New Use 1 1 $ 1 X OTHER Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfD. etc. MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION, INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $240.00 + consultant feel $ TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE $ City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date 1 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. N m E 0 z c 3 0 F- ar c Cn In u� 0 0 0 N Z J IL c ar z U W r a 0 a ar M in m E z Q Packet Pg. 264 2017-2019 - Impact Fee Rate Table Fee 2017 2018 (w/ 4,036.61 2019 and beyond ITE Land Use Code - Description Calculation (w/ $2,543.01 cost per (w/ $5,530.21 cost per trip) trip) cost per trip) 110 - Light Industrial per sq. foot $3.64 $5.77 $7.91 140 - Manufacturing per sq. foot $2.72 $4.32 $5.92 151 - Mini -warehouse per sq. foot $0.97 $1.54 $2.10 210 - Single-family house per dwelling $2 873.60 $4,561.37 $6,249.14 unit 220 - Apartment per dwelling unit $1,881.83 $2,987.09 $4,092.36 230 - Condominium per dwelling unit $1,525.81 $2,421.97 $3,318.13 240 - Mobile home per dwelling $1,627.53 $2,583.43 $3,539.33 un it 251 - Senior Housing per dwelling unit $584.89 $928.42 $1,271.95 320 - Motel per room $1,525.81 $2,421.97 $3,318.13 420 - Marina per boat berth $457.74 $726.59 $995.44 444 - Movie theater per screens $31,905.90 $50,645.37 $69,384.85 492 - Health/fitness club per sq. foot $6.74 $10.98 $14.66 530 - High school per sq. foot $1.98 $3.15 $4.31 560 - Church per sq. foot $1.68 $2.67 $3.65 565 - Day care center per sq. foot $15.77 $25.02 $34.29 620 - Nursing home per bed $483.17 $766.96 $1,050.74 710 - General office per sq. foot $5.01 $7.95 $10.89 720 - Medical office per sq. foot $9.54 $15.14 $20.74 820 - Shopping center per sq. foot $3.26 $5.17 $7.08 826 - Specialty retail per sq. foot $2.06 $3.27 $4.48 850 - Supermarket per sq. foot $10.50 $16.84 $22.84 850 - Convenience market 15-16hrs per sq. foot $14.07 $22.38 $30.58 912 - Drive-in bank per sq. foot $15.97 $25.41 $34.73 932 - Restaurant: sit-down per sq. foot $10.04 $15.95 $21.84 933 - Fast food, no drive -up per sq. foot $22.28 $35.36 $48.44 934 - Fast food with drive -up per sq. foot $26.24 $41.66 $57.07 936 - Coffee/donut shop, no drive- per sq. foot $13.88 $22.04 $30.19 u 938 - Coffee/donut shop, drive -up, per sq. foot $25.56 $40.37 $55.58 no indoor seating per vehicle 945 - Gas station with convenience fueling $6,916.99 $10,979.58 $15,042.18 position EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 N m E 0 z _ 3 0 F_ d _ Cn In u� 0 0 T 0 N z J a N c d E z U W a 0 a d M Cn m E z M Q Packet Pg. 265 2004 - Impact Fee Rate Edn7onds icoad Inipric) i ov reott- TABLE 4 IMPACT FEE RATES (1) (2) (4) (5) Trip ITE I rE Land Use Trip % New Length Not New Trips per Impact Fee Per Unit V $ cf,111C. Cat,_-jory Rate, TrIps-1 Factor' Unit of Measurc 763.66 per Trip 110 Ugfit Industrial 0.99 100% 1.59 1.56 1,000 sq ft 1-19 per square foot 140 Manufacturing 0,74 100% 1.59 1,16 1.000 sq It 0.90 per sqtiare foot I 151 mint -warehouse 026 1 0OV6 1.59 0.41 1,i100sq It 0.32 pet square -foot Z10 Single family 1101 100% 1.09 1,10 dwelling 840.72 per dwelling unit House 220 Apartment, 0.62 100% 1,15 031 dwelling 544.49 per dwelli(T unit 230 Condominium 0.54 100% 1.15 O.GZ dwelling 474,24 per dwelhug unit 240 Mobile Home 0.516 100% 1,09 0,61 dwelling 466A4 per dwelling unit 310 Hotel 0,61 100% 1,,25 0,76 room 582.29 per room 320 MotO 0,47 100% 1.25 0.59 room 446.65 pet room 4Z0 Marina 0, 19 '100% 0697 018berth 140.74 per boat berth 430 Golf course 0.30 100% 1.00 0.30 acre 229.10 per acre 444 Mipvie Theater 3.BQ 100%1 0.72 2.74 1,000 sq ft 1.36 p±r square foot 492 Parquet club 1.83 100% 0.97 1,78 1 pOOO sq It 3.58 per square foot S30 High School 1,02 100% 0.62 0.63 11,000 sq ft 0.48 II;,er sqwoe foot 560 Church 0.66 100% 1.15 0.76 1,000 sq A 0-58 per sqwrefoot 610 HosDital 0.92 100% 1.56 1.44 1,000 sq It 1,10 per square foot 620 14ursinq home 0.20 100% 0.87 0,17 Ind 132,813 per bed 710 General Office 1.49 100%i 1,59 2,31 1,00 sq It 1.81 per square foot 720 Mecicall office 3.66 100% 1.50 5.49 1,000 sq It 4.19 per square foot 820 Sluxiping Center 3./4 81% 0.A0 1.21 1,GOO 59 It OA3 per square foot 832 Restaurant: in I 0.13b 56% 1.06 6,45 1,000 sq It 4,9 Z per square foot iiloml 833 Fast food. no 26A 5 52% 0.62 B.43 1,000 %ij It 6,44 per square foot drive - up 834 rasr food, wl 33,48 51% 0,62 10.59 1.000 scl ft 8,03 per square foot drhov-up 844 Gas station 14.56 60% 0-53 4.63 puyip, 3,535,82 per of 845 'Gas station 13.38 47% 0.53 3.33 pump 2,545,26 per WIP wIcnmienience 850 Wwrrnatkat 11.S1 55% 0.135 4.11 11,000 stj ft 3.14 per square foot 851 Wmenionce 53,73 39% 0,40 8.38 1,000 sq it 6.40 per square foot market-24 lit I 91P 1,16%;P-In Rank _1 54.771 51%, 0.47 1 13.13 1,0.00 sq ft 1 10.03 per square foot ITIF Trk) Generation (6th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Trip Encts Excludes posy -by It1j:A: &ee "Trip Geneirition Handbook: As, HE Pioposect Recommen dad Practice' (191315) 4 Rollo to clyefuge Irlp letiglij, I'Vjp: vet CIO JURIJIIQ P405ition Henclierson, City of Edm,)nds, Washingtori YounC & Apili 15, 2003 Camp,ony Page 18 EFFECTIVE 9/12/2004 I Packet Pg. 266 NE1/4, SW1/4, SEC. 31, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH Scale 1 if = 30' SHEETINDEX A.0 VICINITY PLAN A.1 SITE PLAN 1 OF 7 TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS 2 OF 7 TRIPLEX FOUNDATION PLAN 3 OF 7 TRIPLEX MAIN FLOOR PLAN 4 OF 7 TRIPLEX UPPER FLOOR PLAN 5 OF 7 TRIPLEX ROOF FRAMING PLAN 6 OF 7 TRIPLEX DETAILS 7 OF 7 TRIPLEX NOTES 1 OF 7 DUPLEX ELEVATIONS 2 OF 7 DUPLEX FOUNDATION PLAN 3 OF 7 DUPLEX MAIN FLOOR PLAN 4 OF 7 DUPLEX UPPER FLOOR PLAN 5 OF 7 DUPLEX ROOF FRAMING PLAN 6 OF 7 DUPLEX DETAILS 7 OF 7 DUPLEX NOTES C1.1 CIVIL COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES C2.1 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2.2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C3.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN & DETAILS C3.2 GRADING & DRAINAGE DETAILS C4.1 WATER & SEWER PLAN C4.2 WATER & SEWER DETAILS C.5.1 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN L-1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN E-1.0 LIGHTING PLAN ATTACHME114T t Packet Pg. 267 4 d N E 1 /4 , SW 1 /4 , SEC. 31, T . 27 N . , R . 4 E . , W.M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE DATA COUNTY O F S N O H O M I S H THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, HANBURY'S SITE ADDRESS: CITY OF EDMONDS, SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, EXISTING ZONING: \ WASHINGTON, PROPOSED LAND USE: LOT AREA: \ TOP: 42Z5' TOP: 424.1' LEG 424.1' TOP: 424.5' EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER LOT SLOPE: TOE. 421.8, TOE. • 421.8' OE- 421.8' TOE. • 421.8' PC ELEV DRIVEWAY SLOPES: P ELEV EG: 4225' EG: 424.1' 424.1' EG: 424.5' AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 2219685. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OD SNOHOMISH, NUMBER OF UNITS: f 425.00 f .25 HT.• o.�' HT.• 2.3' N8�°45'00"E �0.00'2.3' HT• 2.7' 24'CED STATE OF WASHINGTON. WATER DISTRICT. \ 2-12'CED SEWER DISTRICT. \ 6.5' x _ X SCHOOL DISTRICT.- 3' MAX HT LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS FIRE DISTRICT: P PS#1 z ROCKERY o MAXIMUM ALLOWED COVERAGE 45 PERCENT (4,876 SF) \ - o LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED: 41 PERCENT (4,487 SF) 8 SLO�PE \ T ° DUPLEX 1, 784 SF >S ASEMEN T \ 60.00' w z ?DED UNDER is A=422.00' 15' REAR SETBACK - - - - l/E LINE - - - - - _ "I TRIPLEX 2, 703 SF EA '00701050551 � PS#2 � a I TOP: 424.0' BUILDING AREA: 2,690 SF v ��_ q 'A' 33.25' B=423.75' TOE. 421.8' EAVES OVER 30" 13 SF °EA I E IL NEB - 1 � I I I 1 � EG: 424. 0' \ - ------ ----- HT.• 2.2' ----- \ __1s_5o'____ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS 20 0GARAGE STALL TYP� UNIT I o I: \ 10� UNIT E I l 1V EXISTING: 3, 161 SF (29 PERCENT) SLOPE o I PS/3 I I� o I I �` SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. • 1,546 SF ic SHEDS 420 SF DECK 175 SF \ I�--------- L PROPOSED •38.00' ~ - - i 22.00' � 30'CED CONCRETE. 540 SF A ASPHAL T. 480 SF DUPLEX o I N I PROPOSED: 7,280 SF(62 PERCENT) ROOFTOPS: 5,172 SF 18EC SLOPE o PS# EX. SFR I i ' - - UNIT D WALKWAYS: 397 SF \ I I I �� P. 24'CED DRIVEWAYS: 1, 711 SF SEE CIVIL SHEET C3.1 FOR ROCKERY HEIGHTS --I- - E LINE - s\ _ _ J '.U.D. EASEMENT 6 5 �. ° I � 33.25' �1 C=421.00' N 8110140147 SLOPE I �' X o PS15 o D=417.75' I -----� ---- � EAU-- _ _ 18'CED LANDSCAPE 2 -2 EAl/E LINE OD 420' -- __DECK _ 24 s-----I----z--------I- (TBR) EAVELINE - - - BUFFER 22. o Az41 - ----- l 38. DD' � B-420.50' 2-12'CED �� I I I o 18" ON 69' o \ X SLOPE N I PS16 12�CON I \ I I I2f� T PROPOSED ROCKERY ---�--- UNIT_C I 18'CED 18'CON 22.Oo' z �.: PR POSED of 18 CED ���N .. EXISITNG GRADE 69 P5#7 a •7�':CELI (TBR)) (VARIES) 4 ON SLOPE I o 1 I EX 38.00' �n 1 'CON 22.0o JOVERED �I , IA(q) o I PORCH UNIT B a N 4'CED FINISH GRADE 'v 18zCON - ' = o _ 69 o I I n d 3-12'CED \ SLOPE I I N 8- - J 2 CON--�$----------- J EX. 40'COxIl1III 22.00' 38.00' BLDG. j�f(TBR) -� _ ----------- 24'DEC \ \ 79 o I i (TBR) o 4'CED o \ 10' 0 10' 20' 30' NONE Scale 1" = 10, ob 0-0 o� .. b o ID !.0 O O b p 6b °p 0.0 ,�090 •..\ • 0 A o OCo o^ o� o TIGHTLINE FTG DRAIN TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PER PLAN SLOPE �A UNIT " f : TYPICAL ROCKERY SECTION 6.1 NOT TO EXCEED 3' IN HEIGHT WITHIN SETBACKS P P P 55- 55- 55 W W W 8629 238TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 004633 007 003 02 RM 1.5 TOWNHOUSE 10, 836 SF 10.8 PERCENT DOWNWARD NE TO SW NOTED ON PLAN 5 UNITS CITY OF EDMONDS OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER DISTRICT EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS DUPLEX POINT 'A' 422.00' POINT 'B' 423.75' POINT 'C' 421.00' POINT 'D' 417.75 AVERAGE GRADE 421. 13' ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 445.96' MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED 446. 13' WITH 5' INCREASE FOR ROOFS 451. 13' WITH PITCH OF 4: 12 OR GREATER LOWEST FOOTING ELEVATION 418.09' TRIPLEX POINT 'A' 417.25' POINT 'B' 420.50' POINT 'C' 415.90' POINT 'D' 412.10' AVERAGE GRADE 416.44' ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 442.54' MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED 441.44' WITH 5' INCREASE FOR 446.44' ROOFS WITH PITCH OF 4: 12 OR GREATER LOWEST FOOTING ELEVATION 411.25' PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS 5-TWO BEDROOM UNITS 1.8 STALLS PER UNIT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 9 STALLS REQUIRED PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 14 STALLS PROVIDED W L� p 55 W w BENCHMARK: CONTROL POINT #12 OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER DISTRICT DATUM NE CORNER OF EIGHTEEN FIRS ELEV = 424.26 d 0 t _ 0 d _ 3 Lo In 0 0 CD 0 N Z J a c d s 0 a Ca r_ 0 a d 0 Co c d E s 0 a Packet Pg. 268 12 6 TYP DOWNSPOUT TO 4" TIGHTLINE TO APPR'D STORM DRAINAGE (TYPICAL) 611111/10 DECORATIVE KNEE BRACE' DECORATIVE GABLE VENT (OPTIONAL) TYPE 15 FELT UNDE VALLEY FLASHING LAP SIDING OVER TYPE 15 _T OR WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER PER R703 LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: FLASHING & COUNTER FLASHING PER R703.8 & FIREBLOCK PER R602.8 CONT. WALL VENT TYP. D VINYL SASH INSUL. GLASS SUB-FLR 415.18 TOP OF STEM 414.5 GAR SLAB 414.0 UNIT C FIN. GRADE 413.83 DECORATIVE GABLE VENT (OPTIONAL) SAF. GL. N I a� 5-0" ALLOWABLE ROOF ENCROACHMENT 446.44' HIGHEST POINT 442.54' 25-0" MAX. HT. ABV GRADE 441.44' I Lo N L.L. TOP PL. LINE OF NOSING OF STAIR i I o) EX'G AVG GRADE 416.44' SUB FLR 415.18 `N FIN. GRADE 413.33 _ 413.25' 8 "wilm lirnlrn- .-1 SLOPE Ln CD •,,rft'Lll 1 11 ' NUUF VLN IS (TYPICAL) ADDRESSES MUST BE POSTED ON BUILDINGS & PLAINLY VISIBLE FROM ACCESS DRIVE. NUMBERS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A 1" STROKE ON CONTRASING BACKGROUND NO PENETRATIONS 4'-0" 4'-0" OR OPEN'GS W/IN 4'-0' 4'-0° 4'-0" OF PARTY WALL COMP. ROOFING— SAF. GL. SAF. GL. SAF. GL. � � SAF. GIL. I REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 2x12 TRIM BAND UNDER TRUSS CHORD SUB-FLR 415.18 TOP OF STEM 414.0 GAR SLAB 413.5 UNITS A & B) FIN. GRADE 413.33 SAF. GL. SAF. GL. W U Q Z x W O � cD U Mw roa0 �N U-)O Z e o co Q Vroro ZO Q U oo C4C4 z Q J cl e Q I V) U Ei W W m o� x� UL 0 W d� F-N N� N00 O Ln z = w OQ w oZ o� F- =a ¢� J 0d �W ONU Of w O U m W U ❑❑ ❑❑ 0 0 U D� o �JD i m o- r- o O 0_ N I U I � Lo m o Ln Of > o Ld LI_J CD N zN00� �00 cn NQ I F� 00 Mo� N Z Lo n/ p N Lf_ N � v 0 00o LL_ O [1-1 � Z j O Of ~ w0 Nz w= o' cn F- xc� W O� Of Z J w J nn J Q W O Lj F- � Z � O N (n w Oz J CD }w 0_ o O U Packet Pg. 269 E 0 t _ 3 0 a� _ 0 LO LO 0 0 rn 0 N Z J a a� E a 06 L 0 Q 0 V/ _ 0 U fC r y.d Q Packet Pg. 270 I CD o I 1 o I d N N 60'-0" I 22'-0" 38'-0" I 8'-0" 10'-4" 4'-9" 3'-3" TOP OF WINDOW 5-2" ® 8'-0" A.F.F. 2040 SH WALL LINE OF DUPLEX IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS _ 3" 2'-0" I'll2'-0" 7'-7'f TOP OF WINDOWS 3'f ® 8'-0" A.F.F. 2020 2020 2020 PIC PIC PIC 16'-6" M W PARKING AREA n 5-2- 15'-4" 5'-10" 9'-6" I I I I I K, I Soso 19'-0" 3'-0" I UD 1 RI TER I I I I I PORCH ( I I I I I IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS 3 I I I I I U 1 RISERSI I I I I I PANTRY & STORAGE M Soso I I I I I Cot I IL co q Y WALL OPTIONAL 2s OPEN RAIL 7 a PROVIDE CONTINUOUS w HANDRAIL ON WALL v~i SEE NOTE #1 r` GARAGE a O3 GUEST D.W. I 4" CONC. SLAB � - s& FILL & TAMP P - w KITCHEN - SLOPE TO DOOR(S) o w " "'' " "'' " ", o I CID Of PWDR O 00 z o 50� o puj w 00 a yy -; ' 100 CFM HOOD I 2Of � o s ®-' VENT TO EXT. 4'-6" VANITY I `� 16'-6" ' PARKING AREA ® '� '� � Fo -- I 1 4x4 a6x6 COL COL Q _ � O w ;, 4'-9ff 3f_3ff 2x6 STUDS i PARTY WALL 00 PLUMB. 24 11 " 0 ' J In ---- � N 16'-6" �� I PARKING AREA 28 3'-10" FRAME NON-BR'G oo X m w 4x4 "COLUMNS" UNDER _n M v 28 4'-2" COL CANT'D FLR JSTS ABV j ,�„,,/ ❑ 3046PIC 3046PIC 3080 �_- 3 3" 3'_0" 2'-1 1 m CANT. FLR JSTS OUT TO SUPPORT DEC. "COLUMNS" ABV V-6" 12'-0" 1'-6" 1 3'-0" v"Si 1 10'-4" 14'—OYa" 9'-6" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UNIT C DIMS, NOTES, STRUCT. TYP. ALL UNITS U.N.O. 2x6 STUDS ® 16" O.C. TYPICAL FOR PARTY WALL BTWN LIVING AREAS SEE DTL PAGE 6 OPTION: CAP OFF FIREPLACE W/T.V. SHELF ABV GREAT RM. UNIT B NOTES & ELECT. TYPICAL ALL UNITS U.N.O. 2x6 STUDS ® 16" O.C. TYPICAL FOR PARTY WALL BTWN LIVING AREAS O 6 TRANSOM MULLED TO LOWER o WINDOW. TOP OF TRANSOM N A.F.F. TYPICAL �_ CD8'-0" 0 c, ®=) UNIT A STRUCT. & DIMS TYPICAL ALL UNITS U.N.O. 19'-8" TOP OF WINDOWS N ® 8'-0" A.F.F. I 'v 0 2020 2020 2020 N PIC PIC PIC 2'-0" 2'-O„ 3'-5" 12'-6" o� z ujz N J X z Mm 2 > CD n Q � Nn>o r� IMAGINARY LINE % fPROPERTY BTWN UNITS _ > 5 o � Q o aLoW� I 07o>0 ro N O) m - m o INSUL. & I o SOFFIT I N 2'-1" 10'-0" 3'-8" 13'-4" 4'-2" 15-9" 17'-6" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-9" 33'-3" 22'-0" 38'-0" 60'-0" MAIN FLOOR PLAN SCALE: Ya" 1'-0" UNIT A UNITS B & C 625 SQ. FT. MAIN FLOOR 637 SQ. FT. MAIN FLOOR 796 SQ. FT. UPPER FLOOR 771 SQ. FT. UPPER FLOOR 1421 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1408 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 264 SQ. FT. GARAGE 264 SQ. FT. GARAGE N I ONE —HOUR FIRE —RESISTIVE WOOD WALL ASSEMBLY 2X6 WOOD STUD WALL — 100% DESIGN LOAD — ASTM E 119 / NFPA 251 1. FRAMING — NOMINAL 2X6 WOOD STUDS, SPACED 16 IN. O.C., DOUBLE TOP PLATES, SINGLE BOTTOM PLATE 2. SHEATHING — 5/8 IN. TYPE X GYPSUM WALLBOARD, 4 FT. WIDE, APPLIED VERTICALLY. ALL PANEL EDGES BACKED BY FRAMING OR BLOCKING. 3. INSULATION — R-19 FIBERGLASS INSULATION 4. FASTENERS — 2-1/4 IN. TYPE S DRYWALL SCREWS, SPACED 12 IN. O.C. 5. JOINTS AND FASTENER HEADS —WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND, FASTENER HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND TESTS CONDUCTED AT NGC TESTING SERVICES TEST NO: WP-1346 (FIRE ENDURANCE) AUGUST 22, 2003 WP-1351 (HOSE STREAM) SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 THIRD PARTY WITNESS: NGC TESTING SERVICES THIS ASSEMBLY WAS TESTED AT 100% DESIGN LOAD, CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1997 NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION.. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D AS FOLLOWS: - EXCAVATION, GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION INCL. TEMP. CUT SLOPES. - SOIL BEARING VERIFCATION - PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION - FOUNDATION DRAINAGE - GENERAL SITE MONITORING DURING WET WEATHER CONST. (PER GEOTECH REPORT) - FINAL INSPECTION LETTER COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION & TESTING AGREEMENTS. OWNER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR & SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO SIGN FORMS & RETURN TO BLDG OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MUST BE PROVIDED IN EACH UNIT. CONTACT FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION FOR LOCATION &NUMBER. NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ELECTRICAL LEGEND SMOKE ALARM PER R314 AS AMENDED & LISTED PER SA UL 217. INSTALL PER HOUSEHOLD WARNING PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72 & PER MFGR. SPECS. 110V HOUSEHOLD CURRENT WITH BATTERY BACKUP. INTERCONNECT EACH BEDROOM AND LEVEL. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM PER R315 AS AMENDED. co INSTALL OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOM. 50 50 CFM MIN. EXHAUST FAN - VENT TO EXTERIOR. FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. a:iiP/I I41110f19:1facWNi6va21:aI:16:161*3 SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. OSTAIRWAYS PER IRC R311.7 1 36 MIN. STAIRWAY WIDTH. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A 36" MINIMUM DIMENSION IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. A LANDING IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS A DOOR AT THE TOP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, INCLUDING STAIRS IN AN ENCLOSED GARAGE, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE STAIRS. RISERS TO BE 7-" MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND TREADS TO BE 10" MINIMUM DEPTH, BOTH WITH A MAXIMUM VARIATION OF W. TREADS WITH SOLID RISERS TO HAVE %" MINIMUM TO 1Ya" MAX. NOSING OR 11" MINIMUM DEPTH. 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OPEN RISERS ON STAIRWAYS RISING MORE THAN 30". HANDRAIL REQUIRED IF 4 OR MORE RISERS TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 34"-38" ABOVE NOSING AND HAVE A 1Ya"-2" 0 GRIP CONTINUOUS FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE FLIGHT. RETURN ENDS TO WALL OR NEWEL. INSTALL 2x10 BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS TO SUPPORT HANDRAIL BRACKETS. FIREBLOCK BETWEEN STUDS AT STRINGER. 6'-8" MINIMUM VERTICAL HEAD CLEARANCE. PROTECT ENCLOSED ACCESSIBLE UNDER STAIR WALLS AND CEILING WITH Y2" GWB. A FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE A VERTICAL RISE LARGER THAN 147" BETWEEN FLOOR LEVELS OR LANDINGS. STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ILLUMINATION PER R303.7. OBATHROOM NOTES 2 FIREBLOCK TUBS AND SHOWERS PER R302.11. 30"x3O" MINIMUM CLEAR SPACE IN SHOWER. 22" MINIMUM WIDTH SHOWER DOOR TO OPEN OUTWARD IF HINGED. 30" WIDE X 24" DEEP CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED OUTSIDE SHOWER DOOR. ENCLOSURES TO BE SAFETY GLASS. NONABSORBENT SURFACE UP 6' WITH SHOWER. USE CEMENT BOARD OR CEMENT FIBER BOARD FOR TILE BACKING. VAPOR BARRIER NOT PERMITTED BEHIND W.P. GWB AT EXT. WALL. 2.5 GPM SHOWER FLOW RESTRICTOR. TUB OR SHOWER CONTROL VALVES TO BE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING TYPE. 1.6 GAL PER FLUSH MAXIMUM TOILETS. 15" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED. EACH SIDE FROM t OF TOILET & 21" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED IN FRONT. INSTALL 2x10 BLOCKING FOR TOWEL BARS UP 48" ABOVE FLOOR OR BELOW SILL HEIGHT IF AT WINDOW. INSTALL BLOCKING FOR T.P. HOLDERS. INSULATE EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS AND INSTALL AIR BARRIER SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. OGARAGE FIRE SEPARATION — R302.6 3 OPENINGS FROM GARAGE INTO SLEEPING ROOM NOT PERMITTED. DOOR BETWEEN GARAGE AND RESIDENCE SHALL BE 1 %" MINIMUM THICK SOLID WOOD OR STEEL WITH SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED EQUIPPED WITH A SELF -CLOSING DEVICE. DUCTS IN GARAGE & DUCTS PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILINGS SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE SHALL BE NO. 26 GAGE SHEET STEEL AND HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO THE GARAGE. FILL AROUND OTHER PENETRATIONS WITH APPROVED MATERIAL. SEPARATE THE GARAGE FROM THE RESIDENCE AND ITS ATTIC AREA WITH Y" GWB INSTALLED ON THE GARAGE SIDE. SEPARATE FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE WITH %" TYPE X GWB, AND WHERE THE SEPARATION IS A FLOOR- CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH Y2" GWB. OGARAGE APPLIANCES 4 PILOTS, BURNERS, SWITCHES UP 18" MINIMUM ABOVE FLOOR. U.L. APPROVED APPLIANCES WITH AUTO SHUTOFF SWITCH. INSTALL IMPACT BOLLARD. DUCTS IN GARAGE TO BE 26 GAUGE STEEL (NO OPENINGS). INSTALL WATER HEATER ON A GALVANIZED STEEL PAN WITH DRAIN TO EXTERIOR WHERE LEAK WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE. SET ELECTRIC WATER HEATER ON R-10 INSULATED INCOMPRESSIBLE BASE. INSTALL SEISMIC STRAPS WITHIN TOP Y3 AND BOTTOM Y3 (4" MINIMUM ABOVE CONTROLS). PROVIDE PRESSURE RELIEF LINE TO EXTERIOR. IF FUEL FIRED APPLIANCES EXCEED 1000 BTU/H INPUT PER 50 CU. FT. OF GARAGE INSTALL 2 SCREENED COMBUSTION AIR VENTS VOLUME. THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL, ONE WITHIN 12" OF CEILING & ONE WITHIN 12" OF FLOOR. USE NON -CLOSE -ABLE LOUVERED 12x12 WALL VENTS OR 8x18 FOUNDATION TYPE VENTS IN WALL FOR A MINIMUM NET FREE AREA OF 1 SQ. IN. PER 4,000 BTU/H EACH VENT. OGAS FIREPLACES IRC G2434/G2435 5 VENTED GAS FIREPLACES/FIREPLACE HEATERS SHALL BE TESTED PER ANSI Z21.50/Z21.88, INSTALLED PER MFGR'S. INSTRUCTIONS (TO BE ON SITE FOR INSPECTOR). EXCEPT FOR GAS FIREPLACES TESTED PER ANSI Z21.60, THE APPLIANCE SHALL UTILIZE A DIRECT IGNITION DEVICE, AN IGNITOR, OR A PILOT FLAME TO IGNITE THE FUEL AT THE MAIN BURNER, & SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FLAME SAFEGUARD DEVICE THAT AUTOMATICALLY SHUTS OFF THE FUEL SUPPLY WHEN THE MEANS OF IGNITION BECOMES INOPERATIVE. NONCOMBUSTIBLE FIREBLOCK REQUIRED AT VENT DUCT OPENING AT FLOOR AND CEILILNG LEVELS. INSTALL Y" GWB FIREBLOCK BETWEEN CHASE AND ATTIC. ENERGY CREDITS PER R406.2 OWATER HEATER PER OPT. 5c, TABLE 406.2 1 1 WATER HEATING SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: GAS, PROPANE, OR OIL WATER HEATER WITH A MINIMUM EF OF 0.91. OR, SOLAR WATER HEATING SUPPLEMENTING A MINIMUM STANDARD WATER HEATER. SOLAR WATER HEATING WILL PROVIDE A RATED MINIMUM SAVINGS OF 85 THERMS OR 2000 kWh BASED ON THE SOLAR RATING AND CERTIFICATION CORPORATION (SRCC) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF OG-300 CERTIFIED SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEMS. OR, ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER WITH A MINIMUM EF OF 2.0 AND MEETING THE STANDARDS OF NEEA'S NORTHERN CLIMATE SPECIFICATIONS FOR HEAT PUMP WATER HEATERS. W U Q z W O cD U uj w r%) 00 �N ono Z . - o co Q v) ro r7 ZO Q r'�a') r'�e') oo C4C4 z < J p . a _J W W m oM uC 0 W d� �N N� Nrn o Nz z w oz o� xa ¢� J M W ONU �Of W C)U m W U NEI m r- \ o O N -4- \ 0-) I U I ro --D Lo 3: m pw Of Ln > p w L -i W 0 N z N 00 00 Arno NQ I �3�:o co Mo� N z N r- C, O Lf_ N � v 00 o O ------------ L_ 0 �z �o w0 cn z �N (N xc� LLJ OL E w Z J W JJ nn J Q W z I O c3 rn z � o N (n w oZ }w ao O U 3/ PROVIDES 1.5 CREDITS Packet Pg. 271 UI-* � j -) CD CD 0 I CV 0 I 14'-6" 4'-11" 1'-6" 2'-0" 8'-0" 1 2'-0" 12" 22' 9" 2020 2020 PIC PIC ' I co m co c= ' I mzo I Q o INTERIOR RIDGE NLo o NO L----- o > o TRANSOM WINDOWS Q ccf) MULLED TO LOWER WINDOWS o 1 Q =Iw u- �o w w w m O J � Z � O � IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS m U Uf 0 1'-6" 2'-0" 8'-0" CL 12" 2020 2020 PIC I PIC C 10 u m 56'-0" 9'-3" 3'-4" 1 5-11" 3'-0" 20,36 SH 6'-3" i WALL LINE OF DUPLEX 12'-0" IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS 4'-3" 1 1 5-6" 1 2'-0" 1'-6" 2036 2020 2020 SH PIC PIC S&P O r----- DN 16 11 SEI ZS aI W.I.C. U) ; ------_—_— __—__-11 _ I M Y2 WALL UP 36' PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ® OPT. OPEN RAIL HANDRAIL ON WALL SEE NOTE #1 SA I a O " 6 BEDRM. 0 w S&P , a o m Q p INTERIOR RIDGE I LINEN � U Q U 0 , , C-D��� Z� I BATH tom I ; - — J w °° o m z z cn ' 508 tzi� o �0 C-4 a NI ® _�' WH 3 W.I.C. N 50o ; ' N 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. m z I 42" VANITY ' N o TYPICAL FOR PARTY WALL 0w E:> '.� BTWN LIVING AREAS SEE — — — — `� � LAUNDRYDTL SHEET 6 0 DBL S D STU; - ° 5'-11" ' 0 NUS , N� I _6C DBL ; i STUDS w - ' I in 9'-3° 6'-3" C) ' 1 I 24 ' 'i ao i ' I o ofI Lo i Z I ' io ; o i L i ' L----- I 8 of NU N N� I N NON-BR'G DECORATIVE "COLUMN" FRAMED OFF—/ CANT'D FLR JSTS BLW TRANSOM WINDOWS MULLED TO LOWER WINDOWS 14'-6" 0 4'-11" 0o QI� n ' DBL I STUDS 10 1650 3050SH 650 1 SH 3020ABV SH 16 10 16 10 ABV ABV 3" NON-BR'G DE ORATI 4'-3" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3" "COLUMN" FR MED C CANT'D FLR J 3TS BI 1'-6" 12'-0" 1'-6" 15-0" 22'-9" 22'-9" 24 N 2 4° BF 3'-6" `D 5'-9" 3'-9" 26, 11'-11" 20 DBL J STUDSU 2'-1 OY2F LINE OFJ LOWER LEVEL 7'-9" 2640P19 264OP1912640PI( II II SAF. GL. 0 7 LINEN H W 50 BATH V, �I� O m m Z 0 42" VANITY � w w U) o 8'-9" 24 N , 4° BF 6'-1„ 26 5,-2„ 3'-8" m' i 5i ,i i i 4 3" 3" 3'-11Y" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 3'-02" 15-9" 56'-0" 5-0" 33'-3" UPPER FLOOR PLAN SCALE: ,..,-o 796 SQ. FT. LIVING UNIT A 771 SQ. FT. LIVING UNITS B & C UNIT C DIMS, NOTES & STRUCT. TYP. ALL UNITS U.N.O. BEDRM. 2 cwa 0 �I of O ZIi UNIT B NOTES & ELECT. TYPICAL ALL UNITS U.N.O. o II I UNIT A STRUCT. & DIMS TYPICAL ALL UNITS U.N.O. N m TRANSOM WINDOW MULLED TO LOWER WINDOW I N 777777777777 1650 3050SH 1650 SH I30 16ABVII SH 33'-0" �� V-6" 3'-0" " �, 12'-6" m I I io O 6 0 w C 1 -d-z � 0 iI Lo I Lo IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS TOP OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 10" A.F.F. U.N.O. NUm Na-Z n, N U CDm I N_ o _ N U o 0 — 1 N a- N ONE —HOUR FIRE —RESISTIVE ROOF —CEILING ASSEMBLY GYPSUM WALLBOARD, WOOD JOISTS, ROOF COVERING GA FILE NO. RC 2601 1. 2X WOOD JOISTS OR TRUSSES. 2. BASE LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALLBOARD APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO FRAMING 2411o/c w/ 1 1 /4" TYPE W OR S L�W§/g4 TAPE X GYPSUM WALLBOARD OR GYPSUM VENEER BASE APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO JOISTS w/ 1 7/8" TYPE W OR S DRYWALL SCREWS 12"o/c AT JOINTS AND INTERMEDIATE JOISTS AND 1 1/2" TYPE G DRYWALL SCREWS 12"o/c PLACED 2" BACK ON EITHER SIDE OF END JOINTS. JOINTS OFFSET 24" FROM BASE LAYER JOINTS. 4. 1 /2" PLYWOOD WITH EXTERIOR GLUE APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO JOISTS WITH 8D NAILS. APPROPRIATE ROOF COVERING. CEILING PROVIDES ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE PROTECTION FOR WOOD FRAMING, INCLUDING TRUSSES. APPROX. CEILING WEIGHT: 5 PSF FIRE TEST: FM FC 172, 2-25-72; ITS, 8-6-98 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D AS FOLLOWS: — EXCAVATION, GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION INCL. TEMP. CUT SLOPES. — SOIL BEARING VERIFCATION — PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION — FOUNDATION DRAINAGE — GENERAL SITE MONITORING DURING WET WEATHER CONST. (PER GEOTECH REPORT) — FINAL INSPECTION LETTER COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION & TESTING AGREEMENTS. OWNER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR & SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO SIGN FORMS & RETURN TO BLDG OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MUST BE PROVIDED IN EACH UNIT. CONTACT FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION FOR LOCATION &NUMBER. NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ELECTRICAL LEGEND — SMOKE ALARM PER R314 AS AMENDED & LISTED PER sn UL 217. INSTALL PER HOUSEHOLD WARNING PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72 & PER MFGR. SPECS. 110V HOUSEHOLD CURRENT WITH BATTERY BACKUP. INTERCONNECT EACH BEDROOM AND LEVEL. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM PER R315 AS AMENDED. co INSTALL OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOM. 508 CONTINUOUS OPERATION COMBINATION SPOT AND WHOLE WH HOUSE EXHAUST. FOR INTERMITTENT TIMED OPERATION, MUCH LARGER CFM CAPACITY REQUIRED. SEE WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION NOTES ON MECHANICAL SHEET FOR SIZING FORMULA, REQUIREMENTS & OPTIONS. 508 50 CFM MIN. EXHAUST FAN - VENT TO EXTERIOR. GENERAL NOTES FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. a:Zfl91N1111111100931facWV11y]0112I:in 21,9111.3 SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. OSTAIRWAYS PER IRC R311.7 1 36" MIN. STAIRWAY WIDTH. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A 36" MINIMUM DIMENSION IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. A LANDING IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS A DOOR AT THE TOP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, INCLUDING STAIRS IN AN ENCLOSED GARAGE, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE STAIRS. RISERS TO BE 7Y" MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND TREADS TO BE 10" MINIMUM DEPTH, BOTH WITH A MAXIMUM VARIATION OF %". TREADS WITH SOLID RISERS TO HAVE Y4" MINIMUM TO 1Y4" MAX. NOSING OR 11" MINIMUM DEPTH. 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OPEN RISERS ON STAIRWAYS RISING MORE THAN 30". HANDRAIL REQUIRED IF 4 OR MORE RISERS TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 34"-38" ABOVE NOSING AND HAVE A 1Ya"-2"0 GRIP CONTINUOUS FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE FLIGHT. RETURN ENDS TO WALL OR NEWEL. INSTALL 200 BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS TO SUPPORT HANDRAIL BRACKETS. FIREBLOCK BETWEEN STUDS AT STRINGER. 6'-8" MINIMUM VERTICAL HEAD CLEARANCE. PROTECT ENCLOSED ACCESSIBLE UNDER STAIR WALLS AND CEILING WITH Yz" GWB. A FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE A VERTICAL RISE LARGER THAN 147" BETWEEN FLOOR LEVELS OR LANDINGS. STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ILLUMINATION PER R303.7. OBATHROOM NOTES 2 FIREBLOCK TUBS AND SHOWERS PER R302.11. 30"x30" MINIMUM CLEAR SPACE IN SHOWER. 22" MINIMUM WIDTH SHOWER DOOR TO OPEN OUTWARD IF HINGED. 30" WIDE X 24" DEEP CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED OUTSIDE SHOWER DOOR. ENCLOSURES TO BE SAFETY GLASS. NONABSORBENT SURFACE UP 6' WITH SHOWER. USE CEMENT BOARD OR CEMENT FIBER BOARD FOR TILE BACKING. VAPOR BARRIER NOT PERMITTED BEHIND W.P. GWB AT EXT. WALL. 2.5 GPM SHOWER FLOW RESTRICTOR. TUB OR SHOWER CONTROL VALVES TO BE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING TYPE. 1.6 GAL PER FLUSH MAXIMUM TOILETS. 15" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED. EACH SIDE FROM t OF TOILET & 21" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED IN FRONT. INSTALL 200 BLOCKING FOR TOWEL BARS UP 48" ABOVE FLOOR OR BELOW SILL HEIGHT IF AT WINDOW. INSTALL BLOCKING FOR T.P. HOLDERS. INSULATE EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS AND INSTALL AIR BARRIER SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. OEGRESS WINDOWS PER R310 6 EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 44 INCHES MEASURED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE CLEAR OPENING. EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING OF 5.7 SQUARE FEET (5.0 S.F. AT GRADE FLOOR) THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT SHALL BE 24 INCHES, THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING WIDTH SHALL BE 20 INCHES, AND EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL BE OPERATIONAL FROM THE INSIDE OF THE ROOM WITHOUT THE USE OF KEYS, TOOLS OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE. OATTIC ACCESS PER R807.1 7 22"x3O" MINIMUM ROUGH FRAMED OPENING LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. INSULATE AND WEATHERSTRIP DOOR. 12" HEIGHT INSULATION DAM. 30" MINIMUM CLEAR HEADROOM. OGUARDS PER IRC R312 8 WHERE > 30 " ABOVE FLOOR OR GRADE LEVEL BELOW. 36" MINIMUM HEIGHT (AT OPEN SIDE OF STAIRWAY 34" MINIMUM HEIGHT MEASURED FROM NOSING). REQUIRED GUARDS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS FROM THE WALKING SURFACE TO THE REQUIRED HEIGHT THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 4" SPHERE. EXCEPTIONS: THE TRIANGULAR OPENINGS AT THE OPEN SIDE OF STAIR SHALL NOT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 6" SPHERE. GUARDS ON THE OPEN SIDE OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 4%" SPHERE. TOP OF RAIL TO RESIST 200 LB. LOAD IN ANY DIRECTION. PICKETS OR INFILL TO RESIST 50 LBS. APPLIED TO 1 SQ. FT. AREA. GUARDS WITH STRUCTURAL GLASS BALUSTER PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AN ATTACHED TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL. THE TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF THREE GLASS BALUSTER PANELS, OR SHALL BE OTHERWISE SUPPORTED TO REMAIN IN PLACE SHOULD ONE GLASS BALUSTER PANEL FAIL. EXCEPTION: AN ATTACHED TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE GLASS BALUSTER PANELS ARE LAMINATED GLASS WITH TWO OR MORE GLASS PLIES OF EQUAL THICKNESS AND OF THE SAME GLASS TYPE. OWHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION: 9 WHOLE -HOUSE EXHAUST FAN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH M1507.3.4. FAN SHALL BE LESS THAN 1.0 SONES AND SHALL HAVE A FLOW RATE AT 0.25 INCHES WG CAPABLE OF SATISFYING THE CONTINUOUS VENTILATION RATE FROM TABLE M1507.3.3(1). OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY VENTED WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH M1507.3.4.4. THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING AND SHALL BE CONTROLLED VIA AN ON -OFF SWITCH LABELED 'WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION'. OFIREBLOCKING PER R302.11 1 O INSTALL FIREBLOCKING TO CUT OFF CONCEALED DRAFT OPENINGS (VERT. & HORIZ.) IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: IN CONCEALED SPACES OF WALLS, VERTICALLY AT CEILING & FLOOR LEVELS, HORIZONTALLY AT 10' MAXIMUM INTERVALS, AT INTERCONNECTIONS OF CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES (SOFFITS, DROPPED CEILINGS, AND COVE CEILINGS), AT OPENINGS AROUND VENTS, PIPES, DUCTS, CABLES, & WIRES AT CEILING & FLOOR LEVEL WITH AN APPROVED MATERIAL TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF FLAME & GAS. FIREBLOCKING TO BE 2x LUMBER OR DOUBLE THICKNESS OF 1x LUMBER WITH LAP JOINTS, OR ONE THICKNESS OF 23V WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS OR -" PARTICLEBOARD (EITHER WITH JOINTS BACKED BY SAME), OR Y GWB, OR X" CEMENT MILLBOARD, OR BATTS OF MINERAL WOOL OR FIRBERGLASS OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS SECURELY RETAINED IN PLACE. W U Q z L'i o o U mw Mao it N U-) o Z . o co Q Vroro o Q r'�a') r'�e') so C4C4 p a J En U � ww m oM x� aS3 U o) r7 0 L�J d N N� Nrn o Nz z = w OQ w oz o� =a ¢� I W ONU Of w O U m W i m o- r- o O N I_ � I U I r10 __D Lo 3: m uw Of Ln > o Lki LIJ LIJ cD N z N 00 00 Arno NQ I n � 3�: o V / 00 10 N z Lo N o N M � 00 o O LL_ O Cr �z � o o' b w0 z N < xc� LLJ o- w Z J w J Q W LL z I O Lj a- a-E N (n w Oz J =z 00 o' cn }w o� U Packet Pg. 272 2x4 #2HF LEDGER RFTRS & CL'G JSTS 2x4 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS @ 24" O.C. 6:12 PITCH NON-BR'G "COLUMN" FRAMED OFF RFTRS BLW 20 #2HF LEDGER RFTRS & CL'G JSTS 20 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS ® 24" O.C. 6:12 PITCH NON-BR'G "COLUMN" _ FRAMED OFF RFTRS BLW STRUCT. GABLE END TRUSS 12'-0" - PATTERN 6:12 PITCH ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. 12'-0" PATTERN CUT TO 11'-11Y2" 6:12 PITCH 1R" FAVF 0/14AWr TYp THR011rH011T FRMMLU Vff UMN I U FLR JSTS f RMMCU Uff UMN I U FLR JSTS 2x4 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS @ 24"- O.C. 6:12 PITCH ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: l'-O" _ IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS 12" GABLE 0/HANG TYP. U.N.O. WALL & ROOF LINE OF DUPLEX STRUCTURAL SCISSOR GABLE END TRUSS 12'-6" PATTERN 8:12 PITCH (2) LAYERS" GWB EXTERIOR FINISH 1'-6° TRIPLEX UNIT C 6'-9" 3'-6" 3'-0" 3'-3" 3'-0" I 2'-0" 2'-0" MIN. CLR. MIN. CL 2x EDGE z BLOCKING a 0 CL a c5 JTTER & (P. FASCIA I 2x EDGE BLKG BTWN 2x LOOKOUTS LAYERS GWB ROOF 0/HANG PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: " = 1'-O" 15-9" I. 5-6" 1_ 12'-0" 1 `)TRUSS TRUSS SKETCH SCALE: Ya" = 1'-0" ALL VENTS TO BE SCREENED W/ X" CORROSION RESISTANT METAL MESH. (3) 2"0 HOLES PER VENT BLOCK = 7.0 SQ. IN. NET AREA (74%). LOCATE VENT BLOCKS AT CORNERS & EVENLY BETWEEN FOR ATTICS. INSTALL VENT BLOCK EA. RAFTER SPACE FOR CATHEDRAL ROOFS. THE MINIMUM NET FREE VENTILATING AREA SHALL BE 1/150 OF THE AREA OF THE VENTED SPACE. EXCEPTION: THE MINIMUM NET FREE VENTILATION AREA SHALL BE 1/300 OF THE VENTED SPACE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING CONDITION IS MET: AT LEAST 40% AND NOT MORE THAN 50% OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATING AREA IS PROVIDED BY VENTILATORS LOCATED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE ATTIC OR RAFTER SPACE. UPPER VENTILATORS SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 3 FEET BELOW THE RIDGE OR HIGHEST POINT OF THE SPACE, MEASURED VERTICALLY, WITH THE BALANCE OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED BY EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS. WHERE THE LOCATION OF WALL OR ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS CONFLICTS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF UPPER VENTILATORS, INSTALLATION MORE THAN 3 FEET BELOW THE RIDGE OR HIGHEST POINT OF THE SPACE SHALL BE PERMITTED. EAVE BAFFLES: FOR AIR PERMEABLE INSULATIONS IN VENTED ATTICS, A BAFFLE SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO SOFFIT AND EAVE VENTS. BAFFLES SHALL MAINTAIN AN OPENING EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE SIZE OF THE VENT. THE BAFFLE SHALL EXTEND OVER THE TOP OF THE ATTIC INSULATION. THE BAFFLE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE ANY SOLID MATERIAL. WSEC.R402.2.3 DUPLEX UNIT D GENERAL NOTES FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS PER IRC R308. SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. OATTIC ACCESS PER R807.1 7 22"x3O" MINIMUM ROUGH FRAMED OPENING LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. INSULATE AND WEATHERSTRIP DOOR. 12" HEIGHT INSULATION DAM. 30" MINIMUM CLEAR HEADROOM. TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED & MANUFACTURED PER ANSI/TPI 1. DESIGN BY STATE LICENSED ENGR. & MANUFACTURED AT APPROVED PLANT. SUBMIT TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS TO BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION & SHIP DRAWINGS TO JOB SITE WITH TRUSSES. DESIGN DRAWINGS TO INCLUDE ALL LOADS, LUMBER INFO., CONNECTIONS, HANGERS, PERMANENT REQ'D. BRACING LOCATIONS, & RELATED INFORMATION AS SPECIFIED PER R802.10.1. TRUSSES TO BE BRACED TO PREVENT ROTATION & TO PROVIDE LATERAL STABILITY PER TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS, BUILDING PLANS, & PER BUILDING LATERAL ENGINEERING. FIELD CUTS OR MODIFICATION OF TRUSSES NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT ENGINEER'S CALCS. / DTLS. AND PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. BOTTOM CHORD OF TRUSSES TO BE HELD OFF OF NON -BEARING INTERIOR WALLS WITH SIMPSON STC ROOF TRUSS CLIP OR EQUIVALENT. GABLE END TRUSS TO HAVE VERTICAL MEMBERS 24"o.c. FOR SIDING. GABLE END TRUSS TO BE SHEATHED & NAILED PER WALL BELOW. STICK FILL OVER TRUSSES W/ 2x4 HF#2 RAFTERS ® 24"o.c. 4' MAX. SPAN. POST DOWN ® 4'0.c. TO TRUSSES BELOW. STAGGER POSTS OF ADJACENT RAFTERS TO ALT. TRUSSES. UNIT A UPPER ATTIC: AREA = 123,111.00 S.I. (854.94 S.F.) 123,111.00 _ 300 = 410.37 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 2 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S.I. NET EA. NEAR WALL LINE = 100 S.I. NET INSTALL 21 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. _ 147 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN LOWER PART OF ATTIC = 247 S.I. NET (60.19% TOTAL REQ'D) INSTALL 4 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S.I. NET EA. _ 200 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN UPPER PART OF ATTIC = 200 S.I. NET (48.74% TOTAL REQ'D) TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 447.00 S.I. NET UNIT B UPPER ATTIC: AREA = 119,511.00 S.I. (829.94 S.F.) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 119,511.00 _ 300 = 398.37 S.I. NET INSTALL 21 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. =147S.I.NET INSTALL 2 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S. I. NET EA. NEAR WALL LINE = 100 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN LOWER PART OF ATTIC = 247 S.I. NET (62.00% TOTAL REQ'D) INSTALL 4 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S.I. NET EA. = 200 S.I. NET (50.20%) TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 447.00 S.I. NET UNIT C UPPER ATTIC: AREA = 119,511.00 S.I. (829.94 S.F.) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 119,511.00 _ 300 = 398.37 S.I. NET INSTALL 20 VENT BLOCKS* @ 7 S.I. NET EA. =140S.I.NET INSTALL 2 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S. I. NET EA. NEAR WALL LINE = 100 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN LOWER PART OF ATTIC = 240 S.I. NET (60.25% TOTAL REQ'D) INSTALL 4 AF50 ROOF VENTS @ 50 S.I. NET EA. = 200 S.I. NET (50.20%) TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 440.00 S.I. NET NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ROOF VENT LEGEND: ® STANDARD AF50 VENT JACK 50 SQ. INCHES OR 0.347 SQ. FT. C6] 6" x 6" ROOF VENT FOR BATH & UTILITY FANS UNIT A GARAGE ATTIC: AREA = 8,640.00 S.I. (60.00 S.F.) 8,640.00 _ 150 = 57.60 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 6 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 42 S.I. NET INSTALL 1 AF50 ROOF VENT ® 50 S.I. NET EA. _ 50 S.I. NET UNITS B&C GARAGE ATTIC: AREA = 6,912.00 S.I. (48.00 S.F.) 6,912.00 ; 150 = 46.08 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 6 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 42 S.I. NET INSTALL 12 FT CONTINUOUS WALL VENT ® 9 S.I. NET EA. = 108 S.I. NET TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 150.00 S.I. NET UNIT A FRONT PORCH ATTIC: AREA = 1,624.00 S.I. (11.28 S.F.) 1,624.00 ; 150 = 10.83 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 2 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 14 S.I. NET Ito] 11al%lIIIWiIto] ima iip/ln]01SLRole] �11m1I1111I UNITS B&C FRONT PORCH ATTIC: AREA = 10,602.00 S.I. (73.63 S.F.) 10,602.00 _ 150 = 70.68 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 4 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 28 S.I. NET INSTALL 9 FT. CONTINUOUS WALL VENT ® 9 S.I. EA. FT. = 81 S.I. TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 109.00 S.I. NET *BIRD BLOCK VENTING - (3) 2" 0 HOLES PER 24" BAY = 7.068 S.I. OR .0492 S.F. NET F-- W U Q z '0 mo cn w U w r%) ao �N U-)O Z e o o co Q Vroro cD z Q J C4 C4 cl e Q J V) U of m oM =M u0 � 0 W d� �N N� Nrn o Nz z = w OQ w xa ¢� J w ONU w O U m w ti r- o O N I � I I U I rl) D Lo z } o m ui Of > p w Li-i Li-i cD N z N 00 00 NQ I �� O 00 to N Z n/ O N Lf_ N M v O00 o �z ujo w0 Nz w= N � xc� W Ow Ofw Z J w J ��11 J Q W LL z I O c3 a_ Z a_E N (n w Oz J 0� ft�cn }w oin U E 0 m c 0 r- m c 0 Lo Lo 0 0 _m O N z J a d t a 06 t- 0 a W 0 c aD E U fC r y.d Q Packet Pg. 273 0/4"-2"0 CONT. FULL- LENGTH HANDRAIL WITH 1Yz" MIN. SPACE TO WALL OR TERMINATE AT POST. HANDRAIL TO SUPPORT 200 LB. LOAD APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION. PLANT SHELF 6" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THRU TRIANGLE z U i z - 00 i CD IN WIDTH OF LANDINGS NOT TO BE LESS THAN THE STAIRWAY SERVED. 36" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 42" HALF WALL OPT. OPEN RAIL �i o SPACE PICKETS < SO 4%" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS °O - -y4" PLWD. FACE M _ NAIL TO DBL JSTS - / & STRINGERS 10" MIN. TREAD AT 12" -__ FROM NARROWEST SIDE a BUT NOT LESS THAN 6" �2x TREADS 1 x RISERS 3'-0" MIN. STAIR DETAIL FIRESTOP ADJACENT WALLS PER R602.8 %" MINIMUM & 1Ya" MAXIMUM NOSING FIREPROTECT ENCLOSED UNDER STAIR WALLS & SOFFITS W/ 1/2" GWB WINDING STAIR PER IRC R311.5 SCALE: %"=1'-0" JOISTS FRAMING FROM OPPOSITE SIDES OVER A BEARING SUPPORT SHALL LAP A MINIMUM OF 3 3/4" APA T&G OSB OR INCHES AND SHALL BE NAILED TOGETHER WITH A PLYWD. CD INT. w/ EXT. MINIMUM THREE 10d FACE NAILS. SOLID BLOCKING GLUE. NAIL w/ 10d @ 6" O.C. SHALL BE PROVIDED AS LATERAL RESTRAINT AT EDGES & SOLID BLKG. & @ EACH INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT. TOE NAIL JOISTS 10" O.C. IN FIELD AND BLOCKING TO BEAM w/ (3)8d. FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN BEAM -COLUMN CONNECT 2x4 OR 2x6 TIES w/ 2-16d OR METAL CONNECTOR BEAMS & COLUMNS @ BEAM & COLUMN PER FOUNDATION PLAN. TYPICAL EA. SIDE COLUMN BASE UP 8" OR USE PRESSURE TREATED PROTECT COLUMN BASE �� w/ TYPE 90 ROOFING CONCRETE FOOTING PER FOUNDATION PLAN COLUMN -FOOTING ANCHOR INTERIOR GRADE w/ MASB OR EQUIV. INT. BEARING SUPPORT WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: " = 1'-O" 2x6 BASE PL. W/ 16d @ 16" O.C. TO JST & 2-16d EA STUD 3/4" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. 2x6 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE W/ CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ Y"0 A.B. @ 48" O.C. OR PER 10d @ 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID PLAN & BTWN. 4Y" & 12" OF BLKG. & @ 10" O.C. IN FIELD SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MIN. INSTALL 3x3x/4' PLATE WASHERS. S FLR. p w ado cw � U) FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN 00 - a 4" CONC. ON SAND FILL 2x6 PONY WALL p" & TAMP AS REQUIRED TYPICAL FINISHED GRADE INSUL. PLUMBING & MECH. �,� - SLOPED FOR 6" MIN. FALL SEE PLAIN CONC. FND. c° z WITHIN 10' OR PROVIDE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET - SWALE OR DRAIN. INTERIOR GRADE (to ROOF DRAIN 4" TIGHTLINE 18" MIN. CRAWL SPACE 6 410 PERF PIPE D�AIN 12" MIN. UNDER BEAMS WASHED GRAVEL. 6 MIL BLACK POLY BARRIER �CIONNECT TO APPROVED LAP SEAMS 12" MINIMUM 1'-0' ONE STOR�CHARGE 1'-3" TWO STORY n RAISED STEM WALL SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: �" = 1'-O" PREFAB MONO PITCH TRUSS PITCH PER ELEVATION (GIRDER TRUSS SIMILAR) (2) LAYERS %" GWB HANGER PER TRUSS ENGINEER PREFAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (U.N.O.) ROOFING PER PLAN WIND BAFFLE W/ 1" MIN. AIR SPACE C)SIMPSON H2.5A OR H1 EACH J ¢ 12 TRUSS TO TOP PLATES SEE 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK R-49 INSUL. GWB OR 2 SAG RESISTANT GN 2-2x6 TOP PLATES PLAN W/ SIMPSON RBC @ 48 O.C. TO TOP PLATES 8d GALV. @ 6" O.C. (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) LAP SPLICES 48" cn z 4x HEADER PER PLAN. 26 GA. CONT. 2" R-10 FOAM BOARD PER W INSULATION REQUIRED. FLAN I TYPICAL FASCIA w SIDING PER ELEV. 0/ TYPE N 1/2 G.W.B. 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF R-21 INSULATION BUILDING PAPER N� N/ DF DF 7" TF B TIGH M S B TIGH NAIL KRAFT PAPER FACE TO FREE EDGE OF STUD OR PROVIDE 4 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER SCISSOR TRUSS SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: " = 1'-O" PREFAB ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" 0 SPECIAL TRUSS W/ VEF WEBS 24" O.C. %" TYP 'X' GWB ON BOTH SIDE: gig TO ROOF SHEATHING H " GWB OR SAG )TE RESISTANT Y2" GW IL DRYWALL w/ 6d FIRESTOP PER R602.8 YWALL NAILS. 1Ya" YWALL SCRW @ DOUBLE PARTY WALL 2x4 ).c. TYPICAL STUDS @ 16"o.c. w/ 1" 20UGHOUT-UNBLOCKD. SPACE %" 'X' GWB SIDE R-15 INSUL. (1 SIDE; ZEAK FLOOR SHTHG. Y2" RIGID SOUND BD (1) SIDE IN SPACE AT PARTY WALL w/ FITTING FIRE STOP" TYPE 'X' GWB ON EA 2x RIM JOIST (BOTH UNITS) FLR JSTS. PER PLAN " GWB FIRESTOP PER R602.8 DOUBLE PARTY WALL 2x4 N. REQ. STC = 50 STUDS @ 16"o.c. w/ 1" C = 57 AS SHOWN SPACE BTWN. %" 'X' GWB SIDE R-15 INSUL. (1 SIDE; LEAK FLOOR SHTHG. RIGID SOUND BD (1) SIDE IN SPACE AT PARTY WALL w/ FITTING FIRE STOP" TYPE 'X' GWB ON EA 2x RIM JOIST (BOTH UNITS) FLR JSTS. PER PLAN 2x4 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PL CRAWL SPACE PER w/ Y2"0 A.B. @ 48"o.c. OF WALL SECT. ii PLAN & BTWN. 4Y2" & 12° SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MIN. INSTALL 30xy" PLATE WI 1'-3" C. T. EA. EA. NTE PER OF SHERS. PARTY WALL DETAIL SCALE: 3/s" = 1'-O" PROVIDE MINIMUM CLASS C ROOF COVERING, ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR APPROVED FIRE -RETARDANT -TREATED WOOD FOR A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS, OR ONE LAYER OF V TYPE X GWB INSTALLED DIRECTLY BENEATH THE ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING FOR A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS PER R317.2.2. VENT BLOCKS TO BE SCREENED WITH DOUBLE LAYER OF Ya" GALVANIZED METAL MESH w/IN 4 FEET OF EACH SIDE OF WALL. NO ROOF PENETRATIONS ALLOWED w/IN 5 FEET OF EACH SIDE OF WALL. 1 LAYER 5/" TYPE X GWB EACH SIDE OF EACH WALL SEE DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION DETAIL TRUSS @ COMMON WALL WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: %"=1'-0" z 0 w J w w w Ln z 0 > w J w w w cn PREAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (U.N.O.) ROOFING PER PLAN WIND BAFFLE W/ 1" MIN. AIR SPACE SIMPSON H2.5A OR H1 EACH 12 TRUSS TO TOP PLATES SEE m m PLAN 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK R-49 INSULATION 8d GALV. @ 6" O.C. x . (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) " GWB OR SAG RESISTANT Y" GWB 2-2x6 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48" HEADER PER PLAN. USE 2" FOAM BOARD W/ 4x HEADER Y2" G.W.B. R-21 INSUL. 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. Y4" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ 10d @ 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID BLKG. & @ 10" O.C. IN FIELD SOLID BLKG. FLOOR JSTS PER PLAN @ SUPPORTS Y" G.W.B. 2-26 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48" HEADER PER PLAN. USE 2" FOAM BOARD I. u GUTTER PER TYPICAL FASCIA SIDING PER ELEVATION 0/ TYPE 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER 2x6 BASE PL. W/ 16d @ 16" O.C. TO JST & 2-16d EA STUD 2x RIM JOIST W/ 3-16d EACH JOIST W/ 4x HEADER T-1-11 PLYWD OR Y" CDX Y" G.W.B. PLYWOOD SHTG OR %s' O.S.B. NAIL 8d 6" O.C. EDGE, 12" R-21 INSUL. O.C. FIELD OR PER ENGINEER'S S.W. SCHEDULE. 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 2x6 BASE PL. W/ 16d @ 16" O.C. TO JST & 2-16d EA STUD Y4" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. 2x RIM JOIST W/ 3-16d CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ EACH JOIST 10d @ 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID 20 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE W/ BLKG. & @ 10" O.C. IN FIELD Y2"O A.B. @ 48" O.C. OR PER PLAN & BTWN. 412" & 12" OF SILL SOLID BLKG. ENDS. EMBED 7" MINIMUM. INSTALL FLOOR JSTS PER PLAN @ SUPPORTS 3x3xY PLATE WASHERS. 18" MIN. CLEARANCE STEM WALL & FTG. 00 FINISHED GRADE SLOPED FOR = 6" MIN. FALL WITHIN 10' OR 12" MIN UNDER BEAMS ILPER PLAIN CONCRETEHIMi 1 - PROVIDE SWALE OR DRAIN. R-30 INSULATION FOUNDATION DETAIL ii Z INSUL. PLUMBING & MECH. - INT. • ROOF DRAIN 4" TIGHTLINE - SEPARATE FROM FTG. DRAIN GRADE 6 MIL BLACK POLY BARRIER. 4Y 6" 4Y" LAP EDGES 12" MINIMUM 4 0 PERF PIPE IN WASHED GRAVEL. CONNECT TO APPROVED TWO STORY SECTION DISCHARGE WHERE SCALE: %"=1'-O" APPLICABLE PREFAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES PER PLAN @ 24"o/c ROOFING PER PLAN 12 SIMPSON H1 EACH TRUSS TO TOP PLATES SEE PLAN 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK 8d GALV. @ 6" o/c (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) (2)2x4 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48'. GUTTER PLATE HEIGHT PER PER TYPICAL FASCIA ELEVATION FLAN 1 SIDING PER ELEVATION 0/ HEADER PER PLAN TYPE 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER 2x4 #2 H.F. STUDS @ 16" o/c STRL. MEMBERS TO BE #2 HEM/FIR OR BETTER. lf %s' OSB, Y2" CDX PLYWOOD OR T-1-11 SHEATHING. NAIL 8d 6" ON EDGE, 12" IN FIELD OR PER ENGINEER'S S.W. 2x4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. SCHEDULE 2x4 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE 2x4 BASE PLATE W/ Y2"O A.B. @ 48" O.C. OR PER PLAN & BTWN. 02 & 12" 4" CONC. SLAB ON SAND OF SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MIN. LL & TAMP AS REQUIRED - 3x3xO.229" PLATE WASHERS. 00 FINISHED GRADE SLOPED FOR 6" MIN. FALL WITHIN 10' OR SEE CONC. FTG. & STEM ;iiii=ii ;; - -I PROVIDE SWALE OR DRAIN. WALL DETAIL ON THIS SHEET ROOF DRAIN 4" TIGHTLINE SEPARATE FROM FTG. DRAIN 3 6" 3" 4"0 PERF PIPE IN 1'-O" ONE STORY WASHED GRAVEL. 1'-3" TWO STORY CONNECT TO APPROVED DISCHARGE STORAGE WALL SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: %" = 1'-O" GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS & BUILDING DIMENSIONS, & SHALL REPORT ANY VARIATIONS TO THE DESIGNER FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE RRSSC20T5'INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (IRC), 2015 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE (WSEC), 2015 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (UPC), 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC), AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. STRUCTURAL: SEISMIC ZONE D1/D2 PER FIG. R301.2(2) & ENGINEERING WIND (EXP. B) BASIC SPEED: 85 MPH PER FIG. R301.2(4) COMPONENT/CLADDING LOADS /TABLE R301.2(2) TABLE R301.5 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS LOADING LIVE DEAD TOTAL ROOF (GROUND SNOW) 25 PSF 10 PSF 35 PSF UNINHABITABLE ATTICS - NO STORAGE 10 PSF 10 PSF 20 PSF UNINHABITABLE ATTICS - LIMITED STORAGE 20 PSF 10 PSF 30 PSF HABITABLE ATTICS & ATTICS w/ FIXED STAIRS 30 PSF 10 PSF 40 PSF BALCONIES (EXTERIOR) AND DECKS 60 PSF 10 PSF 70 PSF FIRE ESCAPES 40 PSF GUARDRAILS/HANDRAILS 200 LBS AT TOP ANY DIRECTION GUARDRAILS IN -FILL 50 LBS APPLIED TO 1 SQ. FT. PASSENGER VEHICHLE GARAGES 50 PSF IF ELEVATED 2,000 LB PT. ROOMS OTHER THAN SLEEPING ROOMS 40 PSF 10 PSF 50 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS 30 PSF 10 PSF 40 PSF STAIRS 40 PSF 10 PSF 50 PSF OR 300 LB PT. LOAD ON 4 SQ. IN. ALL BEAMS, GIRDERS, HEADERS, RAFTERS, & JOISTS TO BE HEM FIR NO. 2 OR BETTER AS NOTED ON PLANS. GLUED LAMINATED TIMBERS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED & IDENTIFIED AS REQUIRED IN AITC A190.1 & ASTM D3737. PLYWOOD INDEX: CD. ROOF & SUBFLOOR SHEATHING PER TABLE R503.2.1.1(1). WALL SHEATHING PER TABLE R602.3(3) & R602.3(4). SHEATHING FASTENERS PER TABLES R602.3(1) & (2). STRUCTURAL MEMBER FASTENERS PER TABLE R602.3(1). WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE, NEAR GROUND, OR WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR NATURALLY DURABLE WOOD PER R317. CONCRETE & REBAR: REBAR TO BE 60,000 PSI - GRADE 60 ASTM A706. WALL REBAR SHALL BE PLACED NO CLOSER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE THAN Y THE WALL THICKNESS. REBAR COVER PER ACI 318. FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON 1500 PSF MINIMUM UNDISTURBED SOIL. CONCRETE TO BE MINIMUM F'c = 2500 PSI @ 28 DAYS (3,000 PSI FOR GARAGE/CARPORT SLABS, EXTERIOR PATIO SLABS ON GRADE, & WEATHER EXPOSED BASEMENT, FOUNDATION WALLS, PORCHES, AND STEPS W/ 57-7% AIR ENTRAINMENT). MINIMUM DESIGN EQUIV. FLUID PRESSURE = 35 PCF OR PER SOILS ANALYSIS. USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS OF EQUIVALENT STRENGTH MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SIMPSON HOLDOWNS, STRAPS, AND CONNECTORS ROOFING OPTIONS: C)O SHAKE/SHINGLE ROOF: INTERWV. w/ 18" WIDE STRIPS OF TYPE 30 FELT. NAIL w/ (2) GALV. FASTENERS PER EACH PIECE TO 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING OR EQUIVALENT. PROVIDE 1/2" CCX PLYWOOD SHEATHING @ OVERHANGS. @ COMPOSITION ROOF: 0/ NONPERFD. TYPE 15 FELT. NAIL w/ (4) GALV. FASTN'R PER EA PIECE 0/ 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHTG. OR EQUIV. w/ 1/2" CCX @ 0/HANGS. @ CONCRETE TILE ROOF: 0/ TYPE 30 FELT. NAIL w/ (2) GALV. FASTENERS PER EA PIECE OVER 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHTG. OR EQUIV. w/ 1/2" CCX @ 0/ HANGS. @ METAL ROOF: INSTALL PER MFG. SPECS. 0/ TYPE 15 FELT 0/ 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHEATHING OR EQUIVALENT w/ 1/2" CCX PLYWOOD SHEATHING @ 0/HANGS. @ ROOF SHTG. TO BE NAILED w/ 8d @ 6" OC EDGES & 12" OC FIELD - UNBLKD. TYP. 2x6 WALL 3/4" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ 10d @ 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID —\ BLOCKING & @ 10" O.C. IN FIELD SOLID BLOCKING SIMPSON A35 @ 32" O.C. FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN T-1-11 PLYWD OR Y" CDX PLYWOOD SHTG OR 316" O.S.B. NAIL 8d 6" O.C. EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD OR PER ENGINEER'S SHEARWALL SCHEDULE 2x6 BASE PLATE 2x RIM JOIST Y" CCX PLYWOOD SHTG. OR 3/16" O.S.B. SOFFIT 2-2x6 TOP PLATES R-30 INSUL. W/ VAPOR LAP SPLICES 48" PER RETARDER WARM SIDE CANTILEVER WILL BEAR r _ PLAN ON FRAMED WALL OR - -L FOUNDATION WALL CANTILEVER SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: �" = 1'-O" REINFORCING TO BE 60 KSI MINIMUM. #4 FULL WALL HEIGHT VERTICAL AT EACH CORNER, INTERSECTION, AND CONTINUOUS #4 HORIZ. BAR 6N ENDS OF WALL, (2) #5 AROUND TO BE LOCATED 6" BELOW OPENINGS EXTENDING 24" BEYOND TOP OF WALL EDGE OF OPENING. REBAR N(RAf1G 00 #4 BAR W/ e l l l l a 12d MINIMUM j i X HORIZONTAL 3" MIN. CD EXTENSION - 4"0 ROOF o STD. HOOK DRAIN 4"0 PERF. p FTG. DRAIN z 2" °II z IN GRAVEL MIN. II° IP 00 M IF FOOTING POURED SEPARATELY, CON TIN. #4 HORIZ. BAR PROVIDE #4 BAR 48" O.C. MAX. 3"-4" FROM BOT. OF FTG. WITH STD. HOOK. EXTEND TO 3" CLR. FROM BOT. OF FTG. ROTATE 1'-O" MIN. 1 STORY HORIZ. EXTENSION PARALLEL TO 1'-3" MIN. 2 STORY WALL FOR PROPER CONC. COVER. 1'-11" MIN. 3 STORY CON C. FTG. & STEM WALL SCALE: Y2" = 1'-O" [if N Zoe W m w r7 00 U ujN �O Z C_'O co Q cn r7 M r= O oIm o p . a J WW m om _c) �3 c� oU ' 0 W d H CV N� Nrn O �„ z N O m: Q � J ma �W a- O U LC) w =)a rn> 00 c>m w ti r O O a- N I I - rn I U I Il) __D Ln m pw Q N Of > p w W LJ C) 3ii cD N z N 00 00 rn00 Ao NQ I 0Nr M p N Z � Lf_ N4�0 � v 00 o 0 LL_O0_ CDz � o o' w0 cn z � � (N � xc� LLJ O� Of w Z J w JJ z Q W L_L I O cj a- rnz o N (n w Oz J 0C-D >- w 0- U in 0 t c 0 r- am c 0 cn Lo Lo 0 0 O N z J a C a� t Q 06 0 CL W w t co c t U r Q Packet Pg. 274 2015 WASHINGTON STATE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 0ZI92.110I10:/:1►1[6ll0a.%P/1.1[f]ZR31 HEATING & COOLING EQUIPMENT: THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES USED FOR HEATING AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 72-F (22'C) FOR HEATING AND MINIMUM OF 75-F (24'C) FOR COOLING PER R302.1. THE HEATING OR COOLING OUTDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES SHALL BE SELECTED FROM APPENDIX C PER R302.2 WSEC. HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL S BASED ON BUILDING LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION METHODOLOGIES PER R403.7 WSEC. SYSTEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS C403 AND f NfHgNgCkPLIgP*§WAA�NgRXWI §04 � �6TL*#r IREA dAPA� BE ELEVATED SO THAT THE SOURCE OF IGNITION IS NOT LESS THAN 18 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR SURFACE PER IMC SECTION 304.3. POTABLE WATER HEATERS AND HOT WATER STORAGE TANKS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE. ALL WATER HEATERS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF BEING REMOVED WITHOUT FIRST REMOVING A PERMANENT PORTION OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE. THE POTABLE WATER CONNECTIONS AND RELIEF VALVES FOR ALL WATER HEATERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE. DOMESTIC ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 174 OR UL 1453. OIL -FIRED WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 732. SOLID -FUEL -FIRED WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 2523. THERMAL SOLAR WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER JEQN�jpklt24E@6I�iUfft�fWkkd%ITIRA2-*E BUILDING ENVELOPE TO BE PROVIDED WITH COMBUSTION AIR PER THE INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE IFGC . FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL COMPLY)WITH IMC 303.6. FUEL -FIRED FURNACE OR SERVICE WATER HEATER SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN OR OBTAIN COMBUSTION AIR FROM A BEDROOM, BATHROOM, TOILET ROOM, OR CLOSET. EXCEPTIONS: 1. DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES THAT OBTAIN ALL COMBUSTION AIR DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS. 2. SOLID FUEL -FIRED APPLIANCES, PROVIDED THAT THE ROOM IS NOT A CONFINED SPACE AND THE BUILDING IS NOT OF UNUSUALLY TIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 3. APPLIANCES INSTALLED IN A DEDICATED ENCLOSURE IN WHICH ALL COMBUSTION AIR IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS PER CHAPTER 7 IMC. THE ENCLOSURE SHALL HAVE A WEATHER-STRIPPED SOLID DOOR. CENTRAL FURNACES TO BE INSTALLED IN CLOSETS, OR CONFINED SPACES SUCH AS ALCOVES, SHALL HAVE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS LISTING SUCH LOCATIONS AS ACCEPTABLE. FURNACES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER IMC 306.1.1. FURNACES WITH A FIREBOX OPEN TO THE ATMOSPHERE SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 6" WORKING SPACE ALONG THE FRONT PROPANE GAS -BURNING APPLIANCES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN A PIT, BASEMENT, OR SIMILAR LOCATION WHERE HEAVIER THAN AIR GAS MIGHT COLLECT. THE APPLIANCES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN AN ABOVE GRADE, UNDER FLOOR SPACE OR BASEMENT, UNLESS SUCH LOCATION IS PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS FOR REMOVAL OF UNBURNED GAS (APPROVAL MUST BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT). CHIMNEYS AND VENTS: EVERY APPLIANCE DESIGNED TO BE VENTED SHALL BE CONNECTED TO A VENTING SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH CHAPTER 8 OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC). EVERY FACTORY BUILT CHIMNEY, TYPE L VENT, TYPE B GAS VENT, OR TYPE BW GAS VENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER ITS MANUFACTURER'S LISTING, INSTRUCTIONS, AND APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8 IMC. GAS VENTS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 5 OF THE INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE (IFGC). GAS VENTS SHALL TERMINATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. GAS VENTS WITH AN INTERNAL DIAMETER OF 12" OR LESS AND ARE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 8' FROM A VERTICAL WALL OR SIMILAR OBSTRUCTION SHALL TERMINATE ABOVE THE ROOF IN ACCORDANCE WITH IFGC FIGURE 503.6.4. AS PROVIDED FOR DIRECT -VENT SYSTEMS IN IFGC SECTION 503.2.3. AS PROVIDED FOR APPLIANCES WITH INTEGRAL VENTS IN IFGC SECTION 503.2.4. AS PROVIDED FOR MECHANICAL DRAFT SYSTEMS IN IFGC SECTION 503.3.3. AS PROVIDED FOR VENTILATING HOODS AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS PER IFGC 503.3.4. MINIMUM HEIGHT PER IFGC 503.6.5. A TYPE B OR L GAS VENT SHALL TERMINATE AT LEAST 5 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE HIGHEST CONNECTED APPLIANCE DRAFT HOOD OR FLUE COLLAR. A TYPE B-W GAS VENT SHALL TERMINATE AT LEAST 12 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL FURNACE. TYPE L VENTING SYSTEMS SHALL TERMINATE NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET ABOVE THE ROOF THROUGH WHICH IT PASSES, NOR LESS THAN 2 FEET ABOVE ANY ANY PORTION OF THE BUILDING WITHIN 10'-O" PER SECTION 802.5 IMC. VENT CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED TO CONNECT APPLIANCES TO THE VERTICAL CHIMNEY OR VENT PER IMC 803, EXCEPT WHERE THE CHIMNEY OR VENT IS ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE APPLIANCE. CONNECTORS SHALL BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE ROOM IN WHICH THE APPLIANCE IS LOCATED, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 803.10.4. WHERE PASSING THROUGH AN UNHEATED SPACE, A CONNECTOR SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OF SINGLE -WALL PIPE. THE CONNECTOR SHALL NOT BE SMALLER THAN THE SIZE OF THE FLUE COLLAR SUPPLIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE APPLIANCE. CONNECTORS SHALL RISE VERTICALLY TO THE CHIMNEY OR VENT WITH A MINIMUM PITCH EQUAL TO ONE-FOURTH UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (2% SLOPE). Q�T§ S L t IFGt�INIMUM CLEARANCE TO COMBUSTIBLES IN ACCORDANCE IV G ND DUCTS PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILING SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NO. 26 GAUGE MINIMUM SHEET STEEL OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL AND SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS INTO THE GARAGE. MECHANICAL & WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC CH. 15 (WA AMENDMENTS) IRC SECTION M1501.1 OUTDOOR DISCHARGE. THE AIR REMOVED BY EVERY MECHANICAL SYSTEM SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO THE OUTDOORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION M1506.2. AIR SHALL NOT BE WXHAUSTED INTO AN ATTIC, SOFFIT, RIDGE VENT OR CRAWL SPACE. EXCEPTION: WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION -TYPE ATTIC FANS THAT DISCHARGE INTO THE ATTIC SPACE OF DWELLING UNITS HAVING PRIVATE ATTICS SHALL BE PERMITTED. IRC SECTION M1502 CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST IRC M1502.1 GENERAL. CLOTHES DRYERS SHALL BE EXHAUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. IRC 1502.2 INDEPENDENTENT EXHAUST SYSTEMS. DRYER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF ALL OTHER SYSTEMS AND SHALL CONVEY THE MOISTURE TO THE OUTDOORS. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO LISTED AND LABELED CONDENSING kUWu 9§} WYE�EWWA' SON. EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL TERMINATE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. EXHAUST DUCT TERMINATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRYER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. IF THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS DO NOT SPECIFY A TERMINATION LOCATION, THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL TERMINATE NOT LESS THAN 3 FEET IN ANY DIRECTION FROM OPENINGS INTO BUILDINGS. EXHAUST DUCT TERMINATIONS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BACKDRAFT DAMPER. SCREENS SHALL NOT BE 1N6TAy5F&.$.T UTMA�LT N ICNYER EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH INTERIOR FINISH AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF METAL A MINIMUM 0.0157-INCH THICK (#28 GA). THE EXHAUST DUCT SIZE SHALL BE 4 INCHES NOMINAL IN DIAMETER. M1502.4.2 DUCT INSTALLATION. EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL BE SUPPORTED AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 12 FEET AND SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE. THE INSERT END OF THE DUCT SHALL EXTEND INTO THE ADJOINING DUCT OR FITTING IN THE DIRECTION OF AIRFLOW. EXHAUST DUCT JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION M1601.4.1 AND SHALL BE MECHANICALLY FASTENED. DUCTS SHALL NOT BE JOINED WITH SCREWS OR SIMILAR FASTENERS THAT PROTRUDE MORE THAN 1 8 INCH INTO THE INSIDE OF THE DUCT. / IIRC M1502.4.3 TRANSITION DUCT. TRANSITION DUCTS USED TO CONNECT THE DRYER TO THE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM SHALL BE A SINGLE LENGTH THAT IS LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 2158A. TRANSITION DUCTS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET IN LENGTH. TRANSITION DUCTS SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED WITHIN CONSTRUCTION. M1502.4.4 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATORS. DOMESTIC DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATORS SHALL CONFORM TO UL 705 FOR USE IN DRYER EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEMS. THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATOR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANSE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. M1502.4.5 DUCT LENGTH. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE EXHAUST DUCT LENGTHSHALL BE DETERMINED BY ONE OGF THE METHODS SPECIFIED IN SECTIONS M1502.4.5.1 THROUGH M1§g�0:0•SPECIFIED LENGTH. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE 35 FEET FROM THE CONNECTION TO THE TRANSITION DUCT FROM THE DRYER TO THE OUTLET TERMINAL. WHERE FITTINGS ARE USED, THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE REDUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1502.4.5.1. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE TRANSITION DUCT. IRC M1502.4.5.1 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT FITTING EOUIVALENT LENGTH DRYER EXHAUST DUCT FITTING TYPE EQUIVALENT LENGTH 4" RADIUS MITERED 45-DEGREE ELBOW 2'-6" 4" RADIUS MITERED 90-DEGREE ELBOW 5'-O" 6" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-0" 6" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-91, 8" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-0" 8" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW V-7" 10" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 9" 10" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW V-6" FOR SI: 1 INCH = 25.4 MM, 1 FOOT = 304.8 MM, 1 DEGREE = 0.0175 RAD. M1502.4.5.2 MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. THE SIZE AND MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DRYER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. THE CODE OFFICIAL SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MAKE AND MODEL OF THE DRYER AT THE CONCEALMENT INSPECTION. IN THE ABSENCE OF FITTING EQUIVALENT LENGTH CALCULATIONS FROM THE DRYER TR MQ�5.g §�YE�A�H�fU§��}t� fly �€N�f$�ROR. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. M1502.4.5.3 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. M1502.4.6 LENGTH IDENTIFICATION. WHERE THE EXHAUST DUCT EQUIVALENT LENGTH EXCEES 35 FEET, THE EQUIVALENT LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON A PERMANENT LABEL OR TAG LOCATED WITHIN 6 FEET OF THE EXHAUST DUCT CONNECTION. M1502.4.7 EXHAUST DUCT REQUIRED. WHERE SPACE FOR A CLOTHES DRYER IS PROVIDED AN EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED. WHERE THE CLOTHES DRYER IS NOT INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF OCCUPANCY THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE CAPPED OR PLUGGED IN THE SPACE IN WHICH IT ORIGINATES AND IDENTIFIED AND MARKED "FUTURE USE." EXCEPTION: WHERE A LISTED CONDENSING CLOTHES DRYER IS INSTALLED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE STRUCTURE. M1502.5 PROTECTION REQUIRED. PROTECTIVE SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE PLACED WHERE NAILS OR SCREWS FROM FINISH OR OTHER WORK ARE LIKELY TO PENETRATE THE CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST DUCT, SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FINISHED FACE OF FRANING MEMBERS WHERE THERE IS LESS THAN 1Ya INCHES BETWEEN THE DUCT AND THE FINISHED FACE OF THE FRAMING MEMBER. PROTECTIVE SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL, HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 0.062 INCH AND SHALL NOT EXTEND LESS THAN 2 INCHES ABOVE SOLE PLATES AND BELOW TOP PLATES. COPYRIGHT © 2016 DESIGN LINES, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE USE OF THIS SHEET IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE CLIENTS OF DESIGN LINES, INC. AND ONLY FOR THE PARTICULAR PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PRINTS WERE ISSUED. USE OR REUSE OF THIS SHEET FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN AND SUBJECT TO PENALTY OF LAW. WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC 1507 (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT M1507.1 GENERAL. LOCAL EXHAUST AND WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. M1507.2 RECIRCULATION OF AIR. EXHAUST AIR FROM BATHROOMS AND TOILET ROOMS SHALL NOT BE RECIRCULATED WITHIN A RESIDENCE OR TO ANOTHER DWELLING UNIT AND SHALL BE EXHAUSTED DIRECTLY TO THE OUTDOORS. EXHAUST AIR FROM BATHROOMS AND TOILET ROOMS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO AN ATTIC, CRAWL SPACE OR OTHER AREAS OF THE 011IM (`1.1 SYSTEM DESIGN. EACH DWELLING UNIT OR GUESTROOM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH SECTION M1507.3.4, M1507.3.5, M1507.3.6 OR M1507.3.7. COMPLIANCE IS ALSO PERMITTED TO BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE OR ASHRAE STANDARD 62.2. M1507.3.2 CONTROL AND OPERATION. 1. LOCATION OF CONTROLS. CONTROLS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE OCCUPANT. 2. INSTRUCTIONS. OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OCCUPANT BY THE INSTALLER OF THE SYSTEM. 3. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY MANUAL SWITCHES, DEHUMIDISTATS, TIMERS, OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. 4. CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS. CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY. EXHAUST FANS, FORCED -AIR SYSTEM FANS OR SUPPLY FANS SHALL BE E UIPPED WITH "FAN ON" AS OVERRIDE CONTROLS. Q CONTROLS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE VENTILATION SYSTEM WITHOUT ENERGIZING OTHER ENERGY -CONSUMING APPLIANCES. A LABEL SHALL BE AFFIXED TO THE CONTROLS THAT READS "WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION (SEE OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS)." 5. INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS. INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 5.1. THEY SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPERATING INTERMITTENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY. 5.2. THEY SHALL HAVE CONTROLS CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE EXHAUST FANS, FORCED -AIR SYSTEM FANS OR SUPPLY FANS WITHOUT ENERGIZING OTHER ENERGY -CONSUMING APPLIANCES. 5.3. THE VENTILATION RATE SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 403.8.5.1. 5.4. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED SO THAT IT CAN OPERATE AUTOMATICALLY BASED ON THE TYPE OF CONTROL TIMER INSTALLED. 5.5. THE INTERMITTENT MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM SHALL OPERATE AT LEAST ONE HOUR OUT OF EVERY FOUR. 5.6. THE SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A MANUAL CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL, SUCH AS A 24-HOUR CLOCK TIMER. 5.7. AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION, THE AUTOMATIC CONTROL SHALL BE SET TO OPERATE THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE USED TO CALCULATE THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN SIZING. SCiAEM §HA L"06I Wlfflff �(P)}lKMWR°JION TE EXCEPTION: THE WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM IS PERMITTED TO OPERATE INTERMITTENTLY WHERE THE SYSTEM HAS CONTROLS THAT ENABLE OPERATION FOR NOT LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF EACH 4-HOUR SEGMENT AND THE VENTILATION RATE PRESCRIBED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) IS MULTIPLIED BY THE FACTOR DETERMINED IN ACC DWELLING UNIT FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) BEDROOMS - - - 012-34567>7 AIRFLOW IN CFM < 1500 30 45 60 75 90 1501-3000 45 60 75 90 105 3001-4500 60 75 90 105 120 4501-6000 75 90 105 120 135 6001-7500 90 105 120 135 150 > 7501 105 120 135 150 165 TABLE IRC M1507.3.3(1) CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM AIRFLOW RATE REQUIREMENTS FOR SI: 1 SQUARE FOOT = 0.0929M , 1 CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE = 0.0004719M3/s TABLE M1507.3.3(2) INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION RATE FACTORSab RUN-TIME PERCENTAGE IN EACH 4-HOUR ° 25% 33% 50% 66% 75% 100% SEGMENT FACTOR° 4 3 2 1.5 1.3 1 a. FOR VENTILATION SYSTEM RUN TIME VALUES BETWEEN THOSE GIVEN, THE FACTORS ARE PERMITTED TO BE DETERMINED BY INTERPOLATION. b. EXTRAPOLATION BEYOND THE TABLE IS PROHIBITED. METHOD #1, IRC M1507.3.4 WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING EXHAUST FANS. M1507.3.4.1 WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION FANS. EXHAUST FANS PROVIDING WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SHALL HAVE A FLOW RATING AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1). MANUFACTURERS' FAN FLOW RATINGS SHALL BE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO HVI 916 OR AMCA 210. M1507.3.4.2 FAN NOISE. WHOLE HOUSE FANS LOCATED 4 FEET OR LESS FROM THE INTERIOR GRILLE SHALL HAVE A SONE RATING OF 1.0 OR LESS MEASURED AT 0.1 INCHES WATER GAUGE. MANUFACTURER'S NOISE RATINGS SHALL BE DETERMINED AS PER HVI 915 (MARCH 2O09). REMOTELY MOUNTED FANS SHALL BE ACOUSTICALLY ISOLATED FROM THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING AND FROM ATTACHED DUCT WORK USING INSULATED FLEXIBLE DUCT OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL. M1507.3.4.3 FAN CONTROLS. THE WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION FAN SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION M1507.3.2 AND M1507.3.2.1. M1507.3.4.4 VENTILATION OPENINGS. EACH HABITABLE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH OUTDOOR AIR INLETS OR OPERABLE WINDOWS WITH AN OPENABLE AREA NOT LESS THAN 4 SQUARE INCHES OF NET FREE AREA OF OPENING FOR EACH 10 CFM OF OUTDOOR AIR REQUIRED BY TABLE M1507.3.3(1). WHERE OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLIES ARE SEPARATED FROM EXHAUST POINTS BY DOORS, PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO ENSURE AIR FLOW BY INSTALLATION OF DISTRIBUTION DUCTS, UNDERCUTTING DOORS, INSTALLATION OF GRILLES, TRANSOMS, OR SIMILAR MEANS. DOORS SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO A MINIMUM OF 1/2 INCH �UTtE R I g6T9OKIf�l*1 T§LRRlXLEOVERING. 1. HAVE CONTROLLABLE AND SECURE OPENINGS; 2. BE SLEEVED OR OTHERWISE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO COMPROMISE THE THERMAL PROPERTIES OF THE WALL OR WINDOW IN WHICH THEY ARE PLACED; 3. ANY INLET OR COMBINATION OF INLETS WHICH PROVIDE 10 CFM AT 10 PASCALS ARE DEEMED EQUIVALENT TO 4 SQUARE INCHES NET FREE AREA. VENTILATION OPENING SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OPENINGS SHALL BE CONTROLLABLE, SECURABLE AND SHALL BE DESIGNED TO NOT COMPROMISE THE THERMAL PROPERTIES OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. 7. ASPHALT ROOFS UNLESS IT IS SHOWN THAT NO OTHER LOCATION IS PERMISSIBLE. IN SUCH CASES THE INLET OPENING SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM �T fj�STMT5t 3 5101NTEGRA? WHT0E0%6&E VEANJI ONRgl�J&FSINTAKE ED WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL PROVIDE OUTDOOR AIR AT THE RATE CALCULATED USING SECTION M1507.3.3. INTEGRATED FORCED -AIR VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL DISTRIBUTE OUTDOOR AIR TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE THROUGH THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM DUCTS. INTEGRATED FORCED -AIR VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTING A TERMINAL ELEMENT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING TO THE RETURN AIR PLENUM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM, AT A POINT WITHIN 4 FEET UPSTREAM OF THE AIR HANDLER. THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTION TO THE RETURN AIR STREAM SHALL BE LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM BLOWER AND SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY INTO A FURNACE CABINET TO PREVENT THERMAL SHOCK TO THE HEAT EXCHANGER. THE SYSTEM WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A MOTORIZED DAMPER CONNECTED TO THE AUTOMATIC VENTILATION CONTROL AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION T L I E j 7/• N ���P A�t< ���L�D�1�1� IPP T��fiudMKbt��O EQL IR5�7CA&M 61 NOF R-4. M1507.3.5.3 OUTDOOR AIR INLETS. INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. METHOD #3, M1507.3.6, WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING A SUPPLY FAN. SUPPLY FAN VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL DISTRIBUTE OUTDOOR AIR TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE THROUGH THE FORCED AIR SYSTEM DUCTS OR THROUGH DEDICATED DUCTS TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE. SUPPLY FANS SHALL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OUTDOOR AIR SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) AT 0.40 INCHES WATER GAUGE AS PER HVI 916. THE OUTDOOR AIR MUST BE FILTERED BEFORE IT IS DELIVERED TO HABITABLE SPACES. THE FILTER MAY BE LOCATED AT THE INTAKE DEVICE, IN LINE WITH THE FAN, OR, IN THE CASE OF A CONNECTION TO THE RETURN PLENUM OF THE AIR HANDLER, USING THE FURNACE FILTER. AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EITHER THE SUPPLY OR RETURN AIR STREAM. WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC 1507 (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT) CONTINUED M1507.3.6.2 DUCTS. AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTION TO THE SUPPLY AIR STREAM SHALL BE LOCATED DOWNSTREAM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM BLOWER. IF CONNECTED TO THE RETURN AIR STREAM IT SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 4 FEET UPSTREAM OF THE FORCED AIR SYSTEM BLOWER AND ITS FILTER. NEITHER SHALL BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY INTO A FURNACE CABINET. THE DUCT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1507.3.6.2. THE TERMINAL ELEMENT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE SIZEMB'ZEINC}W316.2LARGER THAN THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT. PRESCRIPTIVE SUPPLY FAN DUCT SIZING SUPPLY FAN TESTED CFM AT 0.40" WG SPECIFIED VOLUME FROM TABLE M1507.3.3(1) MINIMUM SMOOTH DUCT DIAMETER MINIMUM FLEXIBLE DUCT DIAMETER 50-90cfm 4INCH 5INCH 90-150cfm 5INCH 6INCH 150-120cfm 6INCH 7INCH 250-400cfm 7INCH 8INCH M1507.3.6.3 DAMPERS. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BACK -DRAFT DAMPER AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. A CALIBRATED MANUAL VOLUME DAMPER INSTALLED AND SET TO MEET THE MEASURED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) BY FIELD TESTING WITH A PRESSURE GAUGE AND/OR FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS; OR 2. A MANUAL VOLUME DAMPER INSTALLED AND SET TO MEET THE MEASURED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) BY FIELD TESTING WITH A FLOW HOOD OR A FLOW MEASURING STATION; OR 3. AN AUTOMATIC FLOW -REGULATING DEVICE SIZED TO THE SPECIFIED FLOW RATES IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) WHICH PROVIDES CONSTANT FLOW OVER A PRESSURE RANGE OF P.A� rg.(94) Lt gl§I I(1iliPWt�' 4W§@LATION. ALL SUPPLY DUCTS IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-4. M1507.3.6.5 OUTDOOR AIR INLETS. INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. METHOD 4, M1507.3.7, WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING A HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM. ALL DUC WORK IN THIS SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED AND INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. MINIMUM FLOW RATING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THAT SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1). THE SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A FILTER ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE HEAT EXCHANGER IN BOTH THE INTAKE AND EXHAUST AIRSTREAMS WITH A MIN. EFFICIENCY RATING VALUE (MERV) OF 6. ALL SUPPLY DUCTS IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE HEAT EXCHANGER SHALL M�5i.g�IE®U�0tryiN,RgNLti�• INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. M1507.4 LOCAL EXHAUST. LOCAL EXHAUST SHALL BE PROVIDED IN EACH KITCHEN, BATHROOM, WATER CLOSET, LAUNDRY ROOM, INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, SPA, AND OTHER ROOMS WHERE WATER VAPOR OR COOKING ODOR IS PRODUCED. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO HAVE THE CAPACITY TO EXHAUST THE MINIMUM AIR FLOW RATE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1507.4. TABLE IRC M1507.4 MINIMUM REQUIRED EXHAUST RATES FOR ONE & TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS AREA TO BE EXHAUSTED EXHAUST RATES KITCHENS 100 CFM INTERMITTENT OR 25 CFM CONTINUOUS - BATHROOMS TOILET ROOMS MECHANICAL EXHAUST LAUNDRY ROOMS CAPACITY OF INDOOR SWIMMING POOLS 50 CFM INTERMITTENT OR & SPAS 20 CFM CONTINUOUS FOR SI:1 CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE = 0.0004719M3/s M1507.4.1 LOCAL EXHAUST FANS. EXHAUST FANS PROVIDING LOCAL EXHAUST SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM FAN FLOW RATING NOT LESS THAN 50 CFM AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE FOR BATHROOMS, LAUNDRIES, OR SIMILAR ROOMS AND 100 CFM AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE FOR KITCHENS. MANUFACTURERS' FAN FLOW RATINGS SHALL BE DETERMINED AS PER HVI 916 (APRIL 1995) OR AMCA 210. EXCEPTION: WHERE A RANGE HOOD OR DOWN DRAFT EXHAUST FAN IS USED TO SATISFY THE LOCAL EXHAUST REQUIREMENTS FOR KITCHENS, THE RANGE HOOD OR DOWN DRAFT EXHAUST SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 100 CFM AT 0.10 INCHES WATER W9.4.2 LOCAL EXHAUST CONTROLS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY MANUAL SWITCHES, DEHUMIDISTATS, TIMERS, OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEM CONTROLS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. IRC CHAPTER 16: DUCT SYSTEMS (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT) IRC M1601.1 DUCT DESIGN. DUCT SYSTEMS SERVING HEATING, COOLING AND VENTILATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND ACCA MANUAL D OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. M1601.1.1 ABOVE -GROUND DUCT SYSTEMS. ABOVE -GROUND DUCT SYSTEMS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. EQUIPMENT CONNECTED TO DUCT SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LIMIT DISCHARGE AIR TEMPERATURE TO A MAXIMUM OF 250-F (121'C). 2. FACTORY -MADE DUCTS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 181 AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 3. FIBROUS DUCT CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE SMACNA FIBROUS GLASS DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OR NAIMA FIBROUS GLASS DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 4. FIELD -FABRICATED AND SHOP -FABRICATED METAL AND FLEXIBLE DUCT CONSTRUCTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SMACNA HVAC DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS -METAL AND FLEXIBLE, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY TABLE M1601.1.1. GALVANIZED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 653. 5. USE OF GYPSUM PRODUCTS TO CONSTRUCT RETURN AIR DUCTS OR PLENUMS IS PERMITTED, PROVIDED THAT THE AIR TEMPERATURE DOES NOT EXCEED 125-F (52-C) AND EXPOSED SURFACES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO CONDENSATION. 6. DUCT SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS HAVING A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT GREATER THAN 200. 7. STUD WALL CAVITIES AND THE SPACES BETWEEN SOLID FLOOR JOISTS SHALL NOT BE USED AS A DUCT OR AN AIR PLENUM IN NEW CONSTRUCTION. FOR EXISTING SYSTEMS STUD WALL CAVITIES AND THE SPACES BETWEEN SOLID FLOOR JOISTS TO BE USED AS AIR PLENUMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 7.1. THESE CAVITIES OR SPACES SHALL NOT BE USED AS A PLENUM FOR SUPPLY AIR. 7.2. THESE CAVITIES OR SPACES SHALL NOT BE PART OF A REQUIRED FIRE -RESISTANCE -RATED ASSEMBLY. 7.3. STUD WALL CAVITIES SHALL NOT CONVEY AIR FROM MORE THAN ONE FLOOR LEVEL. 7.4. STUD WALL CAVITIES AND JOIST -SPACE PLENUMS SHALL BE ISOLATED FROM ADJACENT CONCEALED SPACES BY TIGHT -FITTING FIRE BLOCKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R602.8. 7.5. STUD WALL CAVITIES IN THE OUTSIDE WALLS OF BUILDING ENVELOPE ASSEMBLIES SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED AS AIR PLENUMS. SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES: SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES (INCLUDING WOOD STOVES, ROOM HEATERS, FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES, FIREPLACE INSERTS, AND MASONRY HEATERS) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF IMC CHAPTERS 3 AND 9 AND IRC CHAPTER 10. SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH TIGHT FITTING METAL OR CERAMIC GLASS DOORS AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. A SOURCE FROM OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURE OF PRIMARY COMBUSTION AIR, CONNECTED TO THE APPLIANCE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. THE AIR INLET SHALL ORIGINATE AT A POINT BELOW THE FIRE BOX. THE DUCT SHALL BE 4 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER, NOT EXCEED 20 FEET IN LENGTH, AND BE INST4LLPp'�1a R9F k LfffIRIfI 0XC0f N%T bMNDED COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY, AS AN INSTALLED UNIT, SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY TO HAVE PASSED TEST NO. 11-NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST, SECTION 12.3, OF ULC S627-M1984 "SPACE HEATERS FOR USE WITH SOLID FUELS." FIREPLACES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH READILY ACCESSIBLE MANUAL OR APPROVED AUTOMATIC TIGHT FITTING FLUE DAMPERS, EXCEPT FIREPLACES WITH GAS LOGS MUST COMPLY WITH IMC 901 OR LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER NFPA 58 AND 54. A 6 SQ. IN. OUTSIDE SOURCE FOR COMBUSTION AIR SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN OUTSIDE AIR DUCT DAMPER (EXCEPTION: WA CERTIFIED FIREPLACES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE COMBUSTION AIR SYSTEM NECESSARY FOR THEIR SAFE AND EFFICIENT COMBUSTION AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER). SITE BUILT FIREPLACES SHALL HAVE TIGHT FITTING GLASS OR METAL DOORS, OR A FLUE DRAFT INDUCTION FAN OR AS APPROVED FOR MINIMIZING BACK -DRAFTING. FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES SHALL USE DOORS LISTED FOR THE INSTALLED APPLIANCE. POST CERTIFICATE WITHIN 3' OF ELECTRICAL PANEL: R401.3 CERTIFICATE (MANDATORY). A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDER OR REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND POSTED ON A WALL IN THE SPACE WHERE THE FURNACE IS LOCATED, A UTILITY ROOM, OR AN APPROVED LOCATION INSIDE THE BUILDING. WHEN LOCATED ON AN ELECTRICAL PANEL, THE CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT COVER OR OBSTRUCT THE VISIBILITY OF THE CIRCUIT DIRECTORY LABEL, SERVICE DISCONNECT LABEL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LABELS. THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE PREDOMINANT R-VALUES OF INSULATION INSTALLED IN OR ON CEILING/ROOF, WALLS, FOUNDATION (SLAB, BELOW -GRADE WALL, AND/OR FLOOR) AND DUCTS OUTSIDE CONDITIONED SPACES; U-FACTORS FOR FENESTRATION AND THE SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT (SHGC) OF FENESTRATION, AND THE RESULTS FROM ANY REQUIRED DUCT SYSTEM AND BUILDING ENVELOPE AIR LEAKAGE TESTING DONE ON THE BUILDING. WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE VALUE FOR EACH COMPONENT, THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE VALUE COVERING THE LARGEST AREA. THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE TYPES AND EFFICIENCIES OF HEATING, COOLING AND SERVICE WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT. WHERE A GAS FIRED UNVENTED ROOM HEATER, ELECTRIC FURNACE, OR BASEBOARD ELECTRIC HEATER IS INSTALLED IN THE RESIDENCE, THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST "GAS -FIRED UNVENTED ROOM HEATER," "ELECTRIC FURNACE" OR "BASEBOARD ELECTRIC HEATER," AS APPROPRIATE. AN EFFICIENCY SHALL NOT BE LISTED FOR GAS -FIRED IG n I R� p��Cf �# G TJ . ELECTRIC FURNACES OR ELECTRIC BASEBOARD HEATERS R302.1 INTERIOR DESIGN CONDITIONS. THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES USED FOR HEATING AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 72-F (22'C) FOR HEATING AND MINIMUM OF 75-F (24-C) FOR COOLING. R��3LL0��2.2 EXTE�RIIyO�RADDEESSII�GN CONDITIONS. THE HEATING OR COOLING OUTDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES SHALL BE ffbTRGF IHt Ve'MELOPE REQUIREMENTS: INSULATION: UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INSULATION TO BE PER WSEC TABLE R402.1.1, CLIMATE ZONES 5 AND MARINE 4, AND THE SPECIFIC RE UIREMENTS OF SECTIONS R402.2.1 THROUGH R402.2.11. Q FENESTRATION: R402.3 FENESTRATION PRESCRIPTIVE . IN ADDITION TO THE RE UIREMENTS OF SECTION R402 FENESTRATION SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS R402 3.1 THROUGH R402.3.5. Q AIR LEAKAGE: R402.4 AIR LEAKAGE (MANDATORY). THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO LIMIT AIR LEAKAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS R402.4.1 THROUGH R402.4.4. R402.4.1 BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS R402.4.1.1 AND R402.4.1.2. THE SEALING METHODS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS SHALL ALLOW FOR DIFFERENTIAL EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION. R402.4.1.1 INSTALLATION. THE COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE AS LISTED IN TABLE R402.4.1.1 SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CRITERIA LISTED IN TABLE R402.4.1.1, AS APPLICABLE TO THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL, AN APPROVED THIRD PARTY SHALL INSPECT ALL COMPONENTS AND VERIFY COMPLIANCE. R402.4.1.2 TESTING. THE BUILDING OR DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE TESTED AND VERIFIED AS HAVING AN AIR LEAKAGE RATE OF NOT EXCEEDING 5 AIR CHANGES PER HOUR. TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH A BLOWER DOOR AT A PRESSURE OF 0.2 INCHES W.G. (50 PASCALS). WHERE REQUIRED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL, TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY AN APPROVED THIRD PARTY. A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE RESULTS OF THE TEST SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY CONDUCTING THE TEST AND PROVIDED TO THE CODE OFFICIAL. TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED AT ANY TIME AFTER CREATION OF(( ALL PENETRATIONS O))F THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. ONCE MIANUFACCNTUUREC�, & HgMALLOBUSINESS SHALLGBES PERMIBTTEDRTO BE1 SE�ALOED OFBFLATMTHE FRAME PRIOR TO THE TEST. DURItJG TESTING: 1. EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND DOORS FIREPLACE AND STOVE DOORS SHALL BE CLOSED BUT NOT SEALED BEYOND THE INTENDED WEATHERSTRIPPING OR OTHER INFILTRATION CONTROL MEASURES; 2. DAMPERS INCLUDING EXHAUST, INTAKE, MAKEUP AIR, BACKDRAFT AND FLUE DAMPERS SHALL BE CLOSED, BUT NOT SEALED BEYOND INTENDED INFILTRATION CONTROL MEASURES; 3. INTERIOR DOORS, IF INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, SHALL BE OPEN, ACCESS HATCHES TO CONDITIONED CRAWL SPACES AND CONDITIONED ATTICS SHALL BE OPEN; 4. EXTERIOR OPENINGS FOR CONTINUOUS VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATORS SHALL BE CLOSED AND SEALED; 5. HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS, IF INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, SHALL BE TURNED OFF; ANN��Dyy gyp ��� � g r,�gT�gS �F 1Ng ��ER L T T��E E �yF ST gN TIONSA ll)AUDFTION5�E§F%AN 5OOT�VAR�FEEI-OF COgDITlOI EFFL00RA kAk FULLY ADDITIONS TESTED WITH THE EXISTING HOME HAVING A COMBINED MAXIMUM LEAKAGE RATE OF 7 AIR CHANGES/HR. TO QUALIFY FOR THIS EXCEPTION, THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING HOUSE MUST BE PRIOR TO THE 2009 WSEC. SYSTEMS: R403.1 CONTROLS (MANDATORY). AT LEAST ONE THERMOSTAT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH SEPARATE HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM. R403.1.1 PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT. WHERE THE PRIMARY HEATING SYSTEM IS A FORCED -AIR FURNACE, AT LEAST ONE THERMOSTAT PER DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING THE HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM ON A DAILY SCHEDULE TO MAINTAIN DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE SET POINTS AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE DAY. THE THERMOSTAT SHALL ALLOW FOR, AT A MINIMUM, A 5-2 PROGRAMMABLE SCHEDULE (WEEKDAYS/WEEKENDS) AND BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING AT LEAST TWO PROGRAMMABLE SETBACK PERIODS PER DAY. THIS THERMOSTAT SHALL INCLUDE THE CAPABILITY TO SET BACK OR TEMPORARILY OPERATE THE SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN ZONE TEMPERATURES DOWN TO 55-F 13'C OR UP TO 85'F 29'C . THE THERMOSTAT SHALL INITIALLY BE PROGRAMMED WITH A HEATING TEMPERATURE SET POINT NO HIGHER THAN 70-F (21'C) AND A COOLING TEMPERATURE SET POINT NO LOWER THAN 78-F 26'C . THE THERMOSTAT AND OR CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE AN AtAd SDEADBAND OF NOT LESS THAN 107. 1. SYSTEMS CONTROLLED BY AN OCCUPANT SENSOR THAT IS CAPABLE OF SHUTTING THE SYSTEM OFF WHEN NO OCCUPANT IS SENSED FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO 30 MINUTES. 2. SYSTEMS CONTROLLED SOLELY BY A MANUALLY OPERATED TIMER CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE SYSTEM FOR NO MORE THAN TWO HOURS. R403.1.2 HEAT PUMP SUPPLEMENTARY HEAT (MANDATORY). UNITARY AIR COOLED HEAT PUMPS SHALL INCLUDE CONTROLS THAT MINIMIZE SUPPLEMENTAL HEAT USAGE DURING START-UP, SET-UP, AND DEFROST CONDITIONS. THESE CONTROLS SHALL ANTICIPATE NEED FOR HEAT AND USE COMPRESSION HEATING AS THE FIRST STAGE OF HEAT. CONTROLS SHALL INDICATE WHEN SUPPLEMENTAL HEATING IS BEING USED THROUGH VISUAL MEANS (E.G., LED INDICATORS). HEAT PUMPS EQUIPPED WITH SUPPLEMENTARY HEATERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CONTROLS THAT PREVENT SUPPLEMENTAL HEATER OPERATION ABOVE 40'F. AT FINAL INSPECTION THE AUXILIARY HEAT LOCK PYJ3TWMs.Sb*YSBANY-TAI�oH�WbLEI SL§§I 'LL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS R403.3.1 THROUGH RjP4�:�.1 INSULATION (PRESCRIPTIVE). DUCTS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-8. DUCTS WITHIN A CONCRETE SLAB OR IN THE GROUND SHALL BE INSULATED TO R-10 WITH INSULATION DESIGNED TO BE USED BELOW GRADE. EXCEPTION: DUCTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF LOCATED COMPLETELY INSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. DUCTS LOCATED IN CRAWL SPACES DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THIS R403C3 2�SOEALING (MANDATORY). DUCTS, AIR HANDLERS, AND FILTER BOXES SHALL BE SEALED. JOINTS AND SEAMS SHALL COMPLY WITH EITHER THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE OR INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, AS 1. AIR -IMPERMEABLE SPRAY FOAM PRODUCTS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL JOINT SEALS. 2. FOR DUCTS HAVING A STATIC PRESSURE CLASSIFICATION OF LESS THAN 2 INCHES OF WATER COLUMN (500 PA), ADDITIONAL CLOSURE SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR CONTINUOUSLY WELDED JOINTS AND SEAMS, AND LOCKING -TYPE JOINTS AND SEAMS OF OTHER THAN SNAP -LOCK AND BUTTON -LOCK TYPES. R^03.3.7.1 SFAl FR MR H0NPI FR. AIR HANDLERS SHALL HAVE A MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION FOR AN AIR LEAKAGE OF NO MORE THAN 2 PERCENT OF THE DESIGN AIR FLOW RATE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 193. R403.3.3 DUCT TESTING (MANDATORY). DUCTS SHALL BE LEAK TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSU RS-33, USING THE MAXIMUM DUCT LEAKAGE RATES SPECIFIED. EXCEPTION: THE TOTAL LEAKAGE TEST OR LEAKAGE TO THE OUTDOORS IS NOT RE UIRED FOR Q DUCTS AND AIR HANDLERS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. FOR FORCED AIR DUCTS, A MAXIMUM OF 10 LINEAR FEET OF RETURN DUCTS AND 5 LINEAR FEET OF SUPPLY DUCTS MAY BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE. ALL METALLIC DUCTS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE MUST HAVE BOTH TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SEALED WITH MASTIC. IF FLEX DUCTS ARE USED, THEY CANNOT CONTAIN SPLICES. FLEX DUCT CONNECTIONS MUST BE MADE WITH NYLON STRAPS AND INSTALLED USING A PLASTIC STRAPPING TENSIONING TOOL. DUCTS LOCATED IN CRAWL SPACES DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THIS EXCEPTION. A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE RESULTS SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY CONDUCTING THE TEST AND PROVIDED TO TH CODE OFFIC AL. R403.3.4. DUC LEAKAGE (MANDATORY). THE TOTAL LEAKAGE OF THE DUCTS, WHERE MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R403.3.3, SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ROUGH -IN TEST: TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 4 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WHEN TESTED AT A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.1 INCHES W.G. (25 PA) ACROSS THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE MANUFACTURER'S AIR HANDLER ENCLOSURE. ALL REGISTERS SHALL BE TAPED OR OTHERWISE SEALED DURING THE TEST. IF THE AIR HANDLER IS NOT INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 3 CFM (85 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA.2. POSTCONSTRUCTION TEST: LEAKAGE TO OUTDOORS SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL T04 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA OR TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 4 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WHEN TESTED AT A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.1 INCHES W.G. (25 PA) ACROSS THE ENTIRE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE (�40.86ME94GA�*IANOLNAfslO �.B61LIIDIA�GMT)WII� QWI$19$L�Sh LT �Ua1bERWI?U6W0 PS I STHFN9TkTL•ATION OF DUCTS IN EXTERIOR WALLS, FLOORS OR CEILINGS SHALL NOT DISPLACE REQUIRED R�t�UVOMWAYSTEM PIPING INSULATION (MANDATORY). MECHANICAL SYSTEM PIPING CAPABLE OF CARRYING FLUIDS ABOVE 105-F (41'C) OR BELOW 55-F (13'C) SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-6. EXCEPTION: UP TO 200 FEET OF HYDRONIC SYSTEM PIPING INSTALLED WITHIN THE CONDITIONED SPACE MAY BE INSULATED WITH A MINIMUM OF f%-INCH INSULATION WITH A K VALUE OF 0.28. R403.4.1 PROTECTION OF PIPING INSULATION. PIPING INSULATION EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE, INCLUDING THAT CAUSED BY SUNLIGHT, MOISTURE, EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE, AND WIND, AND SHALL PROVIDE SHIELDING FROM SOLAR RADIATION THAT CAN CAUSE DEGRADATION OF THE MATERIAL. ADHESIVE k48�.§ V0THR WMFPSTEMS. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR SERVICE HOT WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS R403.5.1 THROUGH R403.5.5. R403.5.1 HEATED WATER CIRCULATION AND TEMPERATURE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (MANDATORY). HEATED WATER T Y T IN A RAN IT TI 4 .1.1. T T P A CIRCULA ION S S EMS SHALL BE CCO D CE W H SEC ON R 03 5 HEA RACE TEM ER TORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R403.5.1.2. AUTOMATIC CONTROLS, TEMPERATURE SENSORS AND PUMPS SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. MANUAL CONTROLS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. R403.5.1.1 CIRCULATION SYSTEMS. HEATED WATER CIRCULATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A CIRCULATION PUMP. THE SYSTEM RETURN PIPE SHALL BE A DEDICATED RETURN PIPE OR A COLD WATER SUPPLY PIPE. GRAVITY AND THERMO-SYPHON CIRCULATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROHIBITED. CONTROLS FOR CIRCULATING HOT WATER SYSTEM PUMPS SHALL START THE PUMP BASED ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF A DEMAND FOR HOT WATER WITHIN THE OCCUPANCY. THE CONTROLS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY TURN OFF THE PUMP WHEN THE WATER IN THE CIRCULATION LOOP IS AT THE DESIRED TEMPERATURE AND WHEN THERE IS NO DEMAND FOR HOT WATER. R403.5.1.2 HEAT TRACE SYSTEMS. ELECTRIC HEAT TRACE SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH IEEE 515.1 OR UL 515. CONTROLS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY ADJUST THE ENERGY INPUT TO THE HEAT TRACING TO MAINTAIN THE DESIRED WATER TEMPERATURE IN THE PIPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIMES WHEN HEATED V��fMj§ ONA06 f lEIf IA '6YSTEMS. A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM HAVING ONE OR MORE RECIRCULATION PUMPS THAT PUMP WATER FROM A HEATED WATER SUPPLY PIPE BACK TO THE HEATED WATER SOURCE THROUGH A COLD WATER SUPPLY PIPE SHALL BE A DEMAND RECIRCULATION WATER SYSTEM. PUMPS SHALL HAVE CONTROLS THAT COMPLY WITH BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. THE CONTROL SHALL START THE PUMP UPON RECEIVING A SIGNAL FROM THE ACTION OF A USER OF A FIXTURE OR APPLIANCE, SENSING THE PRESENCE OF A USER OF A FIXTURE OR SENSING THE FLOW OF HOT OR TEMPERED WATER TO A FIXTURE FITTING OR APPLIANCE. 2. THE CONTROL SHALL LIMIT THE TEMPERATURE OF THE WATER ENTERING THE COLD WATER PIPING TO 104°F (40 1103.5.3 HOT WATER PIPE INSULATION (PRESCRIPTIVE). INSULATION FOR HOT WATER PIPE, BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE (R-VALUE) OF R-3. EXCEPTION: PIPE INSULATION IS PERMITTED TO BE DISCONTINUOUS WHERE IT PASSES THROUGH STUDS, JOISTS OR OTHER STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND WHERE THE INSULATED PIPES PASS OTHER PIPING, CONDUIT OR VENTS, PROVIDED THE INSULATION IS INSTALLED TIGHT TO EACH OBSTRUCTION. R403.5.4 DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS. DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL COMPLY WITH CSA 55.2. DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CSA 55.1. POTABLE WATER -SIDE PRESSURE LOSS OF DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL BE LESS THAN 3 PSI (20.7 kPa) FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS CONNECTED TO ONE OR TWO SHOWERS. POTABLE WATER -SIDE PRESSURE LOSS OF DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL BE LESS THAN 2 PSI (13.8 kPa) FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS CONNECTED TO THREE OR MORE �H49#'ELECTRIC WATER HEATER INSULATION. ALL ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS IN UNHEATED SPACES OR ON gCOSNLCSRREETTE FFLOORRS SnHALL BE PLACED ON AN INCOMPRESSIBLE INSULATED SURFACE WITH A MINIMUM THERMAL R�R AEAFNICAL-VENTILATION MANDATORY . THE BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH VENTILATION THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE OR INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, AS APPLICABLE, OR WITH OTHER APPROVED MEANS OF VENTILATION. OUTDOOR AIR INTAKES AND EXHAUSTS SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC OR GRAVITY DAMPERS THAT CLOSE WHEN THE VENTILATION SYSTEM IS NOT OPERATING. R403.6.1 WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FAN EFFICACY. MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FANS SHALL MEET THE EFFICACY REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE R403.6.1. EXCEPTION: WHERE MECHANICAL VENTILATION FANS ARE INTEGRAL TO TESTED AND LISTED HVAC EQUIPMENT, THEY SHALL BE POWERED BY AN ELECTRONICALLY COMMUTATED MOTOR. TABLE R403.6.1 MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FAN EFFICACY FAN LOCATION AIR FLOW RATE MINIMUM CFM MINIMUM EFFICACY CFM WATT AIR FLOW RATE MAXIMUM CFM RANGE HOODS ANY 2.8 CFM WATT ANY IN -LINE FAN ANY 2.8 CFM WATT ANY BATHROOM, UTILITY ROOM 10 1.4 CFM WATT <90 BATHROOM, UTILITY ROOM 90 2.8 CFM WATT ANY TABLE R402.1.1 a INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT CLIMATE ZONE 5 AND MARINE 4 FENESTRATION U- ' 0.30 SKYLIGHT' U- 0.50 GLAZED FENESTRATION SHGC''e NR CEILING R-VALUE' 49 WOOD FRAME WALLg",n R-VALUE 21 int MASS WALL R-VALUE' 21 21 FLOOR R-VALUE 309 BELOW -GRADE°'" WALL R-VALUE 10 15 21 int+TB SLAB' R-VALUE & DEPTH 10, 2 ft For SI: 1 foot=304.8mm, ci=continuous insulation, int= intermediate framing ° R-values are minimums. U-factors and SHGC are maximums. When insulation is installed in a cavity which is less than the label or design thickness of the insulation, the compressed R-value of the insulation from Appendix Table A101.4 shall not be less than the R-value specified in the QaW% fenestration U-factor column excludes skylights. The SHGC column applies to all glazed fenestration. ° "10/15/21.+TB" means R-10 continuous insulation on the exterior of the wall, or R-15 continuous insulation on the interior of the wall, or R-21 cavity insulation plus a thermal break between the slab and the basement wall at the interior of the basement wall. "10/15/21.+TB" shall be permitted to be met with R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous insulation on the interior or exterior of the wall. "TB" m" t�8 %%1 ckregksURJffMnisfl9&�u0P� 6WdeP4r€�Mts�i811•on grade floors. See R402.2.9.1. e There are no SHGC requirements in the Marine Zone. f,g,h Reserved. 1 The second R-value applies when more than half the insulation is on the interior of the mass wall. I Reserved. k For single rafter- or joist -vaulted ceilings, the insulation may be reduced to R-38. ' Reserved. m Int. (intermediate framing) demotes standard framing 16 inches on center with headers insulated with a minimum of R-10 insulation. " Log and solid timber walls with a minimum average thickness of 3.5 inches are exempt from this insulation requirement. ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS: R404.1 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (MANDATORY). A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF PERMANENTLY INSTALLED LAMPS IN LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE HIGH -EFFICACY LAMPS. R404.1.1 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (MANDATORY). FUEL GAS LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL NOT HAVE CONTINUOUSLY BURNING PILOT LIGHTS. HIGH EFFICACY LAMPS: COMPACT FLOURESCENT LAMPS, T-8 OR SMALLER DIAMETER LINEAR FLOURESCENT LAMPS, OR LAMPS WITH A MINIMUM EFFICACY OF: 1. 60 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS OVER 40 WATTS; 2. 50 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS OVER 15 WATTS TO 40 WATTS; 3. 40 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS 15 WATTS TABLE R402.4.1.1 AIR BARRIER AND INSULATION INSTALLATION COMPONENT CRITERIA° AIR BARRIER AND THERMAL BARRIER A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. EXTERIOR THERMAL ENVELOPE CONTAINS A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER. BREAKS OR JOINTS IN THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE SEALED. AIR -PERMEABLE INSULATION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A SEALING MATERIAL. CAVITY INSULATION INSTALLATION ALL CAVITIES IN THE THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE FILLED WITH INSULATION. THE DENSITY OF THE INSULATION SHALL BE AT THE MANUFACTURERS' PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AND SAID DENSITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR ALL VOLUME OF EACH CAVITY. BATT TYPE INSULATION WILL SHOW NO VOIDS OR GAPS AND MAINTAIN AN EVEN DENSITY FOR THE ENTIRE CAVITY. BATT INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE RECOMMENDED CAVITY DEPTH. WHERE AN OBSTRUCTION IN THE CAVITY DUE TO SERVICES, BLOCKING, BRACING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION EXISTS, THE BATT PRODUCT WILL BE CUT TO FIT THE REMAINING DEPTH OF THE CAVITY. WHERE THE BATT IS CUT AROUND OBSTRUCTIONS LOOSE FILL INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED TO FILL ANY SURFACE OR CONCEALED VOIDS AND AT THE MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFIED DENSITY. WHERE FACED BATT IS USED, THE INSTALLATION TABS MUST BE STAPLED TO THE FACE OF THE STUD. THERE SHALL BE NO COMPRESSION TO THE BATT AT THE EDGES OF THE CAVITY DUE TO INSET STAPLING INSTALLATION TABS. INSULATION THAT UPON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO AVAILABLE SPACE SHALL BE INSTALLED FILLING CEILING/ATTIC THE AIR BARRIER IN ANY DROPPED CEILING/SOFFIT SHALL BE ALIGNED WITH THE INSULATION AND ANY GAPS IN THE AIR BARRIER SEALED. ACCESS OPENINGS DROP DOWN STAIR OR KNEE WALL DOORS TO UNCONDITIONED ATTIC SPACES SHALL BE SEALED. BATT INSULATION INSTALLED IN ATTIC ROOF ASSEMBLIES MAY BE COMPRESSED AT EXTERIOR WALL LINES TO ALLOW FOR REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION. WALLS THE JUNCTION OF THE FOUNDATION AND SILL PLATE SHALL BE SEALED. THE JUNCTION OF THE TOP PLATE AND TOP OF EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SEALED. KNEE WALLS SHALL BE SEALED. CAVITIES WITHIN CORNERS AND HEADERS OF FRAME WALLS SHALL BE INSULATED BY COMPLETELY FILLING THE CAVITY WITH A MATERIAL HAVING A THERMAL RESISTANCE OF R-3 PER INCH MINIMUM. EXTERIOR THERMAL ENVELOPE INSULATION FOR FRAMED WALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONTACT AND CONTINUOUS ALIGNMENT WITH THE AIR BARRIER. WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS AND DOORS THE SPACE BETWEEN WINDOW/DOOR JAMBS AND FRAMING AND SKYLIGHTS AND FRAMING SHALL BE SEALED. RIM JOISTS RIM JOISTS SHALL BE INSULATED AND INCLUDE THE AIR BARRIER. FLOORS (INCLUDING ABOVE -GARAGE AND INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MAINTAIN PERMANENT CONTACT WITH UNDERSIDE OF SUBFLOOR DECKING. CANTILEVERED FLOORS) THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY EXPOSED EDGE OF INSULATION. CRAWL SPACE WALLS WHERE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF FLOOR INSULATION INSULATION SHALL BE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE CRAWLSPACE WALLS. EXPOSED EARTH IN UNVENTED CRAWL SPACES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A CLASS I VAPOR RETARDER WITH OVERLAPPING JOINTS TAPED. SHAFTS, PENETRATIONS DUCT SHAFTS, UTILITY PENETRATIONS, AND FLUE SHAFTS OPENING TO EXTERIOR OR UNCONDITIONED SPACE SHALL BE SEALED. NARROW CAVITIES BATTS IN NARROW CAVITIES SHALL BE CUT TO FIT AND INSTALLED TO THE CORRECT DENSITY WITHOUT ANY VOIDS OR GAPS OR COMPRESSION. NARROW CAVITIES SHALL BE FILLED BY INSULATION THAT ON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO THE AVAILABLE CAVITY SPACE. GARAGE SEPARATION AIR SEALING SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND CONDITIONED SPACES. RECESSED LIGHTING RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE AIR TIGHT, IC RATED, AND SEALED TO THE DRYWALL. PLUMBING AND WIRING BATT INSULATION SHALL BE CUT NEATLY TO FIT AROUND WIRING AND PLUMBING IN EXTERIOR WALLS. THERE SHALL BE NO VOIDS OR GAPS OR COMPRESSION WHERE CUT TO FIT. INSULATION THAT ON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO AVAILABLE SPACE SHALL EXTEND BEHIND PIPING AND WIRING. SHOWER/TUB ON EXTERIOR WALL EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS SHALL BE INSULATED AND THE AIR BARRIER INSTALLED SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. ELECTRICAL/PHONE BOX ON EXTERIOR THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND ELECTRICAL OR COMMUNICATION BOXES OR AIR SEALED BOXES WALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED. HVAC REGISTER BOOTS HVAC REGISTER BOOTS THAT PENETRATE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE SEALED TO THE SUBFLOOR OR DRYWALL. CONCEALED SPRINKLERS WHEN REQUIRED TO BE SEALED, CONCEALED FIRE SPRINKLERS SHALL ONLY BE SEALED IN A MANNER THAT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. CAULKING OR OTHER ADHESIVE SEALANTS SHALL NOT BE USED TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN FIRE SPRINKLER COVER PLATES AND WALLS OR CEILINGS. ° In addition, inspection of log walls shall be in accordance with the provisions of ICC-400. R403.7 E UIPMENT SIZING AND EFFICIENCY RATING MANDATORY . HEATING AND COOLING E UIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL S BASED ON Q ( ) Q BUILDING LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION METHODOLOGIES. THE OUTPUT CAPACITY OF HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN THAT OF THE SMALLEST AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT SIZE THAT EXCEEDS THE LOADS CALCULATED, INCLUDING ALLOWABLE OVERSIZING LIMITS. NEW OR REPLACEMENT HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE AN EFFICIENCY RATING EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW FOR THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION WHERE THE EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED. R403.7.1 ELECTRIC RESISTANCE ZONE HEATED UNITS. ALL DETACHED ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MULTIPLE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS (TOWNHOUSES UP TO THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLAN USING ELECTRIC ZONAL HEATING AS THE PRIMARY HEAT SOURCE SHALL INSTALL AN INVERTER -DRIVEN DUCTLESS) MINI -SPLIT HEAT PUMP IN THE LARGEST ZONE IN THE DWELLING. BUILDING PERMIT DRAWINGS SHALL SPECIFY THE HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE AND LOCATION OF THE HEATING SYSTEM. EXCEPTION: TOTAL INSTALLED HEATING CAPACITY OF 2KW PER DWELLING OR LESS. R403.8 SYSTEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS (MANDATORY). SYSTEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS C403 AND C404 OF THE WSEC-COMMERCIAL PROVISIONS IN LIEU OF SECTION R403. R403.9 SNOW MELT SYSTEM CONTROLS (MANDATORY). SNOW AND ICE -MELTING SYSTEMS, SUPPLIED THROUGH ENERGY SERVICE TO THE BUILDING, SHALL INCLUDE AUTOMATIC CONTROLS CAPABLE OF SHUTTING OFF THE SYSTEM WHEN THE PAVEMENT TEMPERATURE IS ABOVE 50'F, AND NO PRECIPITATION IS FALLING AND AN AUTOMATIC OR MANUAL CONTROL THAT WILL ALLOW SHUTOFF WHEN THE OUTDOOR TEMPERATURE IS ABOVE 40'F. ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS: R406.1 SCOPE. THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL CRITERIA TO BE MET FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 101.2 OF THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CODE. R406.2 ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS (MANDATORY). EACH DWELLING UNIT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH SUFFICIENT OPTIONS FROM TABLE R406.2 SO AS TO ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM NUMBER OF CREDITS: 1. SMALL DWELLING UNIT: ................... 1.5 CREDITS DWELLING UNITS LESS THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET IN CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WITH LESS THAN 300 SQUARE FEET OF FENESTRATION AREA. ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING THAT ARE GREATER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET OF HEATED FLOOR AREA BUT LESS THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET 2. MEDIUM DWELLING UNIT: ........ 3.5 CREDITS ALL DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN #1 OR #3. EXCEPTION: DWELLING UNITS SERVING R-2 OCCUPANCIES SHALL REQUIRE 2.5 CREDITS. 3. LARGE DWELLING UNIT : ............ 4.5 CREDITS DWELLING UNITS EXCEEDING 5000 SQUARE FEET OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. EXCEPTION: DWELLING UNITS SERVING R-2 OCCUPANCIES SHALL REQUIRE 2.5 CREDITS 4. ADDITIONS LESS THAN 500 SQUARE FEET....0.5 CRER DRAWINGS INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL IDENTIFY WHICH OPTIONS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AND THE POINT VALUE OF EACH OPTION, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SEPARATE MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, OR OTHER PERMITS ARE UTILIZED FOR THE PROJECT. � W U Q z = W O cD U UJw MaD �N ono z " - o co Q (n� roro ZO r ff') M cD o o L7 L7 z c J � � p " a J = ww m oM =M � �0 � 0 W d� F-N M NC NM o �J z oQ w 0= o� W =a ¢� J 0CL �W a- ONU �W O U m F) W 0 0 U 0 0 �D m r\ - o O 0- N ~ � M I U I r7 � u7 z } o � m N Of > o W LLJ LLJ C) � cD N zN00� 00 00 Urno NQ I Flo 00N� M o N z N o N � � 0 = I- L O Iz CDz �o Ofb w0 Nz �N F- � xc� L _J O� Of w z J W J nn J Q W I__ - z I O Lj p= rn z o � N (n w Oz J F- CDCD }w ao O U 7/ O� Packet Pg. 275 DOWNSPOU- 4" TIGHTLIN APPR'D ST( DRAINAGE (TYPICAL) DECORATIVE /'ADI C VCAIT LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: ,.-o DECORATIVE rlADI C WE"KIT PER K 2.8 SMOOTH_ SIDING CONT. _ WALL VENT 00 �0 F7l IC7 CI 01F- F- F F FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: Ya" = 1'-O" ADDRESSES MUST BE POSTED ON BUILDINGS & PLAINLY VISIBLE FROM ACCESS DRIVE. NUMBERS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A 1" STROKE ON CONTRASING BACKGROUND 202 TRIM BAND UNDER TRUSS CHORD ALLOWABLE ROOF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ROOF ENCROACHMENT 451.13' 5' INCREASE FOR ROOF WITH SLOPE OF 4:12 OR GREATER 25'-0" MAX. HT. ABV GRADE 446.13' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT (25'): 446.1; PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 445.96 REAR ELEVATION SCALE: / l Lo O W r� ion, Lo zLu U Lo N z 't J n (j ro 0 z p rn J Q 0o p m � n 06 w �J WOf n 2E w 0 2 F-: N o L W Z 0 W O � J o E n Q U) g U O LO 3 U °' 3 o O 04 T O T z r < m a U) > p w of Li W Q 3:E� z Nco� �Mo NQ I c ��o 00 ul N N 0 00o LL_ O C" Mz w O � U w Nz w = �a X 0E- W �_ �W Z J w JJ In Q Q w IL ;z O ci F- 0Z d O O N L� J Z J H = Z C� C� >- IN r w CL O O U Packet Pg. 276 m E 0 t 3 0 aD 0 LO LO 0 0 m 0 N Z J a c aD E a 06 r L 0 Q 0 V/ 0 E V 0 Q Packet Pg. 277 ANY HEIGHT I M STND RIM FRAMED CONSTRUCTION RAISED STEM WALL CONSTRUCTION FLR PONY WALL JSTS HUNG INSIDE CONSTRUCTION FF v MIN. DIM SLAB STND RIM FRAMED CONSTRUCTION MIN. DIM RAISED STEM WALL CONSTRUCTION FLR JSTS HUNG INSIDE An'_n" SEE NOTE #1 IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS _ MAW FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 625 SQ. FT. MAIN FLOOR 771 SQ. FT. UPPER FLOOR 1396 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 264 SQ. FT. GARAGE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D AS FOLLOWS: — EXCAVATION, GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION INCL. TEMP. CUT SLOPES. — SOIL BEARING VERIFCATION — PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION — FOUNDATION DRAINAGE — GENERAL SITE MONITORING DURING WET WEATHER CONST. (PER GEOTECH REPORT) — FINAL INSPECTION LETTER COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION & TESTING AGREEMENTS. OWNER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR & SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO SIGN FORMS & RETURN TO BLDG OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MUST BE PROVIDED IN EACH UNIT. CONTACT FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION FOR LOCATION & NUMBER. NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ELECTRICAL LEGEND SMOKE ALARM PER R314 AS AMENDED & LISTED PER Sa UL 217. INSTALL PER HOUSEHOLD WARNING PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72 & PER MFGR. SPECS. 110V HOUSEHOLD CURRENT WITH BATTERY BACKUP. INTERCONNECT EACH BEDROOM AND LEVEL. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM PER R315 AS AMENDED. Co INSTALL OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOM. 50 (D 50 CFM MIN. EXHAUST FAN - VENT TO EXTERIOR. GENERAL NOTES FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS PER IRC R308. SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. OSTAIRWAYS PER IRC R311.7 1 36" MIN. STAIRWAY WIDTH. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A 36" MINIMUM DIMENSION IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. A LANDING IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS A DOOR AT THE TOP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, INCLUDING STAIRS IN AN ENCLOSED GARAGE, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE STAIRS. RISERS TO BE 7-" MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND TREADS TO BE 10" MINIMUM DEPTH, BOTH WITH A MAXIMUM VARIATION OF % TREADS WITH SOLID RISERS TO HAVE %" MINIMUM TO 1Y" MAX. NOSING OR 11" MINIMUM DEPTH. 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OPEN RISERS ON STAIRWAYS RISING MORE THAN 30". HANDRAIL REQUIRED IF 4 OR MORE RISERS TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 34"-38" ABOVE NOSING AND HAVE A 1Ya"-2" 0 GRIP CONTINUOUS FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE FLIGHT. RETURN ENDS TO WALL OR NEWEL. INSTALL 200 BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS TO SUPPORT HANDRAIL BRACKETS. FIREBLOCK BETWEEN STUDS AT STRINGER. 6'-8" MINIMUM VERTICAL HEAD CLEARANCE. PROTECT ENCLOSED ACCESSIBLE UNDER STAIR WALLS AND CEILING WITH )�" GWB. A FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE A VERTICAL RISE LARGER THAN 147" BETWEEN FLOOR LEVELS OR LANDINGS. STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ILLUMINATION PER R303.7. OBATHROOM NOTES 2 FIREBLOCK TUBS AND SHOWERS PER R302.11. 30"00" MINIMUM CLEAR SPACE IN SHOWER. 22" MINIMUM WIDTH SHOWER DOOR TO OPEN OUTWARD IF HINGED. 30" WIDE X 24" DEEP CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED OUTSIDE SHOWER DOOR. ENCLOSURES TO BE SAFETY GLASS. NONABSORBENT SURFACE UP 6' WITH SHOWER. USE CEMENT BOARD OR CEMENT FIBER BOARD FOR TILE BACKING. VAPOR BARRIER NOT PERMITTED BEHIND W.P. GWB AT EXT. WALL. 2.5 GPM SHOWER FLOW RESTRICTOR. TUB OR SHOWER CONTROL VALVES TO BE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING TYPE. 1.6 GAL PER FLUSH MAXIMUM TOILETS. 15" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED. EACH SIDE FROM t OF TOILET & 21" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED IN FRONT. INSTALL 200 BLOCKING FOR TOWEL BARS UP 48" ABOVE FLOOR OR BELOW SILL HEIGHT IF AT WINDOW. INSTALL BLOCKING FOR T.P. HOLDERS. INSULATE EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS AND INSTALL AIR BARRIER SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. OGARAGE FIRE SEPARATION — R302.6 3 OPENINGS FROM GARAGE INTO SLEEPING ROOM NOT PERMITTED. DOOR BETWEEN GARAGE AND RESIDENCE SHALL BE 1%" MINIMUM THICK SOLID WOOD OR STEEL WITH SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED EQUIPPED WITH A SELF -CLOSING DEVICE. DUCTS IN GARAGE & DUCTS PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILINGS SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE SHALL BE NO. 26 GAGE SHEET STEEL AND HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO THE GARAGE. FILL AROUND OTHER PENETRATIONS WITH APPROVED MATERIAL. SEPARATE THE GARAGE FROM THE RESIDENCE AND ITS ATTIC AREA WITH )�" GWB INSTALLED ON THE GARAGE SIDE. SEPARATE FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE WITH %" TYPE X GWB, AND WHERE THE SEPARATION IS A FLOOR- CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH Y2" GWB. OGARAGE APPLIANCES 4 PILOTS, BURNERS, SWITCHES UP 18" MINIMUM ABOVE FLOOR. U.L. APPROVED APPLIANCES WITH AUTO SHUTOFF SWITCH. INSTALL IMPACT BOLLARD. DUCTS IN GARAGE TO BE 26 GAUGE STEEL (NO OPENINGS). INSTALL WATER HEATER ON A GALVANIZED STEEL PAN WITH DRAIN TO EXTERIOR WHERE LEAK WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE. SET ELECTRIC WATER HEATER ON R-10 INSULATED INCOMPRESSIBLE BASE. INSTALL SEISMIC STRAPS WITHIN TOP Y3 AND BOTTOM Y3 (4" MINIMUM ABOVE CONTROLS). PROVIDE PRESSURE RELIEF LINE TO EXTERIOR. IF FUEL FIRED APPLIANCES EXCEED 1000 BTU/H INPUT PER 50 CU. FT. OF GARAGE VOLUME. INSTALL 2 SCREENED COMBUSTION AIR VENTS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL, ONE WITHIN 12" OF CEILING & ONE WITHIN 12" OF FLOOR. USE NON -CLOSE -ABLE LOUVERED 12x12 WALL VENTS OR 8x18 FOUNDATION TYPE VENTS IN WALL FOR A MINIMUM NET FREE AREA OF 1 SQ. IN. PER 4,000 BTU/H EACH VENT. OGAS FIREPLACES IRC G2434ZG2435 5 VENTED GAS FlREPLACES/FIREPLACE HEATERS SHALL BE TESTED PER ANSI Z21.50/Z21.88, INSTALLED PER MFGR'S. INSTRUCTIONS (TO BE ON SITE FOR INSPECTOR). EXCEPT FOR GAS FIREPLACES TESTED PER ANSI Z21.60, THE APPLIANCE SHALL UTILIZE A DIRECT IGNITION DEVICE, AN IGNITOR, OR A PILOT FLAME TO IGNITE THE FUEL AT THE MAIN BURNER, & SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FLAME SAFEGUARD DEVICE THAT AUTOMATICALLY SHUTS OFF THE FUEL SUPPLY WHEN THE MEANS OF IGNITION BECOMES INOPERATIVE. NONCOMBUSTIBLE FIREBLOCK REQUIRED AT VENT DUCT OPENING AT FLOOR AND CEILILNG LEVELS. INSTALL Y" GWB FIREBLOCK BETWEEN CHASE AND ATTIC. C12WATER HEATER PER OPT. 5c, TABLE 406.2 WATER HEATING SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: GAS, PROPANE, OR OIL WATER HEATER WITH A MINIMUM EF OF 0.91. OR, SOLAR WATER HEATING SUPPLEMENTING A MINIMUM STANDARD WATER HEATER. SOLAR WATER HEATING WILL PROVIDE A RATED MINIMUM SAVINGS OF 85 THERMS OR 2000 kWh BASED ON THE SOLAR RATING AND CERTIFICATION CORPORATION (SRCC) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF OG-300 CERTIFIED SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEMS. OR, ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER WITH A MINIMUM EF OF 2.0 AND MEETING THE STANDARDS OF NEEA'S NORTHERN CLIMATE SPECIFICATIONS FOR HEAT PUMP WATER HEATERS. PROVIDES 1.5 CREDITS NO o LLI �n rI VU Z M Lu U `" z N 't v Do Q J (� 0 Z Q rn m F_ n 06 w �J WOf 0 w E:) 01 F-: N LU �o W Z 0 w � .� J o a Q U)g O LO 3 U °' 3 CD o 04 T O T z r 3- m w a co Of > o � LLJ LLJ Q 3:E� z N00� Urno NQ 00 ul N N � O00o LL- O or-' �z LLJ O wz w = X �F- LLJ W` Z J w JJ Q Q w � z � O c.i F- 00 Z a o O N L(I OJ =z c� c� >- IN on U J3/ 0� i7 Packet Pg. 278 1'-6" 2'-0" 8'-0" 12" 2020 PIC 14'-6" 22'-9" 2020 PIC 0 loo JIQ a I`` 4'-11" W W m F-- 0 3 > ¢ m coQ 0 2"a o X INTERIOR RIDGE c pp O � Z — o M 0 03 � d Off'Z ¢ J O 24 2x6 STUDS ® 16" O.C. i N I v� TYPICAL FOR PARTY WALL 6" I 4'-5" BTWN LIVING AREAS SEE 10 DTL SHEET 6 — — — — '- NU o N o I NU I p — N N� 26 I CV NON-BR'G DECORATIVE "COLUMN" FRAMED OFF—/ CANT'D FLR JSTS BLW ALL ELECTRICAL BOXES S&P ALONG PARTY WALLS TO I DBL HAVE REQ'D HORIZONTAL I STUDS OFFSET, PUTTY PADS, FIRE ; BLK'G, ETC. PER R317.3.2 I W I • C. CI d I I BEDRM.II 1 i I i WI S&P % of �I TRANSOM WINDOWSLi MULLED TO LOWER a WINDOWS a U S ' DBL I STUDS 1650 0 0 6 0 ' 10 1SH 302 ABV 1SH ;�, 10 P 2° O 6 0 6 0 O 1 1 1 1 ABV ABV NON BR'G CORATIVE 3" "COLUMN" AMED OFF 4'-3" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3" CAN 'D FLR JSTS BLW LINE OFJ V-6" 12'-0" 1'-6" LOWER LEVEL 15-0" 7'-9" 22'-9" 56'-0" 33'-3" 15'-9" 5-6" 3'-11Y2" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 3" 3" 2640PIG 12640PIG 12640P1( /U 0 co N DBL I V-11" 3'-6" 26 5'-9" 40 BF 4 2 o 2a N N L—J 9'-3" / 6'-3" T DBL ' Lo STUDS -4 L5'-11" ® 0 vi ® 50(� �o 3: �' � � WH o 42" VANITY z O BATH 50� N ;LAUNDRY 10 ' Eli- 7 LINEN L 2'-10Y2" 8 Y2 WALL UP 36" OPT. OPEN RAIL I 24 3'-8" 6'-1" 5'-6" 26 N 40 BF 1 o CV Lo =N �o mz N 50Lo LINEN ; 4 2/. 42" VANITY SA 0 -0 1 M' I i `)I W.I.C. S&P 0 T in 12'-0" 3'-3" 6040 X0 I I TOP OF ALL — WINDOWS TO BE 6'-10" A.F.F. U.N.O. N� NU 00 N UNIT E NU STRUCT. & DIMS TYPICAL 040 BOTH UNITS U.N.O. — �i IX I UNIT D ' NOTES & ELECT. TYPICAL BOTH UNITS U.N.O. BECIRM. #2 0 X W 0 o_I ; ck� z I LPHANDRAIL OVIDE CONTINUOUS PIC ON WALL 12" 2'-0" 5'-6" SEE NOTE #1 IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS — — UPPER FLOOR PLAN SCALE: x_ r 771 SQ. FT. LIVING PIC 2'-0" V-6" WALL LINE % OF TRIPLEX I Lo i in 0 I N 0 1 CV e 0 I CV 7 in M I M a� I co I ro ONE -HOUR FIRE -RESISTIVE ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLY GYPSUM WALLBOARD, WOOD JOISTS, ROOF COVERING GA FILE NO. RC 2601 1. 2X WOOD JOISTS OR TRUSSES. 2. BASE LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALLBOARD APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO FRAMING 24"o/c w/ 1 1/4" TYPE W OR S �R L� RW /�4 TOE X GYPSUM WALLBOARD OR GYPSUM VENEER BASE APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO JOISTS w/ 1 7/8" TYPE W OR S DRYWALL SCREWS 12"o/c AT JOINTS AND INTERMEDIATE JOISTS AND 1 1/2" TYPE G DRYWALL SCREWS 12"o/c PLACED 2" BACK ON EITHER SIDE OF END JOINTS. JOINTS OFFSET 24" FROM BASE LAYER JOINTS. 4. 1/2" PLYWOOD WITH EXTERIOR GLUE APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO JOISTS WITH 8D NAILS. APPROPRIATE ROOF COVERING. CEILING PROVIDES ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE PROTECTION FOR WOOD FRAMING, INCLUDING TRUSSES. APPROX. CEILING WEIGHT: 5 PSF FIRE TEST: FM FC 172, 2-25-72; ITS, 8-6-98 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D AS FOLLOWS: — EXCAVATION, GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION INCL. TEMP. CUT SLOPES. — SOIL BEARING VERIFCATION — PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION — FOUNDATION DRAINAGE — GENERAL SITE MONITORING DURING WET WEATHER CONST. (PER GEOTECH REPORT) — FINAL INSPECTION LETTER COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION & TESTING AGREEMENTS. OWNER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR & SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO SIGN FORMS & RETURN TO BLDG OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MUST BE PROVIDED IN EACH UNIT. CONTACT FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION FOR LOCATION &NUMBER. NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ELECTRICAL LEGEND SMOKE ALARM PER R314 AS AMENDED & LISTED PER sn UL 217. INSTALL PER HOUSEHOLD WARNING PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72 & PER MFGR. SPECS. 110V HOUSEHOLD CURRENT WITH BATTERY BACKUP. INTERCONNECT EACH BEDROOM AND LEVEL. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM PER R315 AS AMENDED. co INSTALL OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOM. 50 (S CONTINUOUS OPERATION COMBINATION SPOT AND WHOLE WH HOUSE EXHAUST. FOR INTERMITTENT TIMED OPERATION, MUCH LARGER CFM CAPACITY REQUIRED. SEE WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION NOTES ON MECHANICAL SHEET FOR SIZING FORMULA, REQUIREMENTS & OPTIONS. 50 (S 50 CFM MIN. EXHAUST FAN - VENT TO EXTERIOR. FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS PER IRC R308. SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. OSTAIRWAYS PER IRC R311.7 1 36" MIN. STAIRWAY WIDTH. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A 36" MINIMUM DIMENSION IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. A LANDING IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS A DOOR AT THE TOP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, INCLUDING STAIRS IN AN ENCLOSED GARAGE, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE STAIRS. RISERS TO BE 734" MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND TREADS TO BE 10" MINIMUM DEPTH, BOTH WITH A MAXIMUM VARIATION OF h". TREADS WITH SOLID RISERS TO HAVE Y" MINIMUM TO %44" MAX. NOSING OR 11" MINIMUM DEPTH. 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OPEN RISERS ON STAIRWAYS RISING MORE THAN 30". HANDRAIL REQUIRED IF 4 OR MORE RISERS TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 34"-38" ABOVE NOSING AND HAVE A 1Y"-2"0 GRIP CONTINUOUS FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE FLIGHT. RETURN ENDS TO WALL OR NEWEL. INSTALL 2x10 BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS TO SUPPORT HANDRAIL BRACKETS. FIREBLOCK BETWEEN STUDS AT STRINGER. 6'-8" MINIMUM VERTICAL HEAD CLEARANCE. PROTECT ENCLOSED ACCESSIBLE UNDER STAIR WALLS AND CEILING WITH Y" GWB. A FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE A VERTICAL RISE LARGER THAN 147" BETWEEN FLOOR LEVELS OR LANDINGS. STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ILLUMINATION PER R303.7. OBATHROOM NOTES 2 FIREBLOCK TUBS AND SHOWERS PER R302.11. 30%30" MINIMUM CLEAR SPACE IN SHOWER. 22" MINIMUM WIDTH SHOWER DOOR TO OPEN OUTWARD IF HINGED. 30" WIDE X 24" DEEP CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED OUTSIDE SHOWER DOOR. ENCLOSURES TO BE SAFETY GLASS. NONABSORBENT SURFACE UP 6' WITH SHOWER. USE CEMENT BOARD OR CEMENT FIBER BOARD FOR TILE BACKING. VAPOR BARRIER NOT PERMITTED BEHIND W.P. GWB AT EXT. WALL. 2.5 GPM SHOWER FLOW RESTRICTOR. TUB OR SHOWER CONTROL VALVES TO BE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING TYPE. 1.6 GAL PER FLUSH MAXIMUM TOILETS. 15" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED. EACH SIDE FROM E OF TOILET & 21" CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED IN FRONT. INSTALL 2x10 BLOCKING FOR TOWEL BARS UP 48" ABOVE FLOOR OR BELOW SILL HEIGHT IF AT WINDOW. INSTALL BLOCKING FOR T.P. HOLDERS. INSULATE EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS AND INSTALL AIR BARRIER SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. OEGRESS WINDOWS PER R310 6 EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 44 INCHES MEASURED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE CLEAR OPENING. EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING OF 5.7 SQUARE FEET 5.0 S.F. AT GRADE FLOOR) THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT SHALL BE 24 INCHES, THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING WIDTH SHALL BE 20 INCHES, AND EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL BE OPERATIONAL FROM THE INSIDE OF THE ROOM WITHOUT THE USE OF KEYS, TOOLS OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE. OATTIC ACCESS PER R807.1 7 22%30" MINIMUM ROUGH FRAMED OPENING LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. INSULATE AND WEATHERSTRIP DOOR. 12" HEIGHT INSULATION DAM. 30" MINIMUM CLEAR HEADROOM. OGUARDS PER IRC R312 8 WHERE > 30" ABOVE FLOOR OR GRADE LEVEL BELOW. 36" MINIMUM HEIGHT (AT OPEN SIDE OF STAIRWAY 34" MINIMUM HEIGHT MEASURED FROM NOSING). REQUIRED GUARDS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS FROM THE WALKING SURFACE TO THE REQUIRED HEIGHT THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 4" SPHERE. EXCEPTIONS: THE TRIANGULAR OPENINGS AT THE OPEN SIDE OF STAIR SHALL NOT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 6" SPHERE. GUARDS ON THE OPEN SIDE OF STAIRS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A 4%" SPHERE. TOP OF RAIL TO RESIST 200 L.B. LOAD IN ANY DIRECTION. PICKETS OR INFILL TO RESIST 50 LBS. APPLIED TO 1 SQ. FT. AREA. GUARDS WITH STRUCTURAL GLASS BALUSTER PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AN ATTACHED TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL. THE TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF THREE GLASS BALUSTER PANELS, OR SHALL BE OTHERWISE SUPPORTED TO REMAIN IN PLACE SHOULD ONE GLASS BALUSTER PANEL FAIL. EXCEPTION: AN ATTACHED TOP RAIL OR HANDRAIL IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE GLASS BALUSTER PANELS ARE LAMINATED GLASS WITH TWO OR MORE GLASS PLIES OF EQUAL THICKNESS AND OF THE SAME GLASS TYPE. OWHOLE —HOUSE VENTILATION: 9 WHOLE -HOUSE EXHAUST FAN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH M1507.3.4. FAN SHALL BE LESS THAN 1.0 SONES AND SHALL HAVE A FLOW RATE AT 0.25 INCHES WG CAPABLE OF SATISFYING THE CONTINUOUS VENTILATION RATE FROM TABLE M1507.3.3(1). OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY VENTED WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH M1507.3.4.4. THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING AND SHALL BE CONTROLLED VIA AN ON -OFF SWITCH LABELED 'WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION'. OFIREBLOCKING PER R302.11 1 O INSTALL FIREBLOCKING TO CUT OFF CONCEALED DRAFT OPENINGS (VERT. & HORIZ.) IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: IN CONCEALED SPACES OF WALLS, VERTICALLY AT CEILING & FLOOR LEVELS, HORIZONTALLY AT 10' MAXIMUM INTERVALS, AT INTERCONNECTIONS OF CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES (SOFFITS, DROPPED CEILINGS, AND COVE CEILINGS), AT OPENINGS AROUND VENTS, PIPES, DUCTS, CABLES, & WIRES AT CEILING & FLOOR LEVEL WITH AN APPROVED MATERIAL TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF FLAME & GAS. FIREBLOCKING TO BE 2x LUMBER OR DOUBLE THICKNESS OF 1x LUMBER WITH LAP JOINTS, OR ONE THICKNESS OF 2)52" WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS OR Y" PARTICLEBOARD (EITHER WITH JOINTS BACKED BY SAME), OR 1 " GWB, OR Y4" CEMENT MILLBOARD, OR BATTS OF MINERAL WOOL OR FIRBERGLASS OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS SECURELY RETAINED IN PLACE. / l iro o (nnW r� VU Z Lo LLI U `" N Z � Do Q v J (j 0 Z_ Q rn �U J Q Do D 3: m � n 06 w �J WOf 0 w 0 2 F-: o 1 W z 0 LLB O c J E a Q O Lo 3 U °' 3 o a o I � I T � T 3: m w ¢ D Of p w Of W L_ -i 0 3:E z (A00 � a' o N Q I C/ 0viO4 Lo L� C O N N O00o LL- O or-' 4 O� 7 J Packet Pg. 279 GENERAL NOTES NON-BR'G "COLUMN" _ FRAMED OFF RFTRS BLW 2x4 #2HF LEDGER RFTRS & CL'G JSTS 2x4 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS ® 24" O.C. 6:12 PITCH NON-BR'G "COLUMN" - FRAMED OFF RFTRS BLW STRUCT. GABLE END TRUSS 12'-0" - PATTERN 6:12 PITCH ROOF TRUSSES ® 24" O.C. 12'-0" PATTERN CUT TO 11'-11X" 6:12 PITCH IA" PAW O/WAMr TYP TWP0ll W011T I lxmwILV VI I Vmll I V FLR JSTS I I\f M1 u VI I Vmll1 V FLR JSTS 20 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS ® 24"- O.C. 6:12 PITCH 2x4 #2HF RFTRS & CL'G JSTS ® 24"- O.C. 6:12 PITCH — — — — 12" GABLE 0/HANG TV. U.N.O. ALL BR'G WALLS ARE SHADED I D 24" I 'ITCH UNIT E UNIT D :S ® 24" 12 PITCH IA - - - - - - - - - - - - - i IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE BTWN UNITS ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: k-,-o — — — — —1 FOR WINDOWS WITH OPERABLE OPENINGS MORE THAN 72" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR SURFACE BELOW, THE LOWEST PART OF THE CLEAR OPENING SHALL BE 24" MINIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS: FULLY OPEN WINDOWS WHERE A 4" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THROUGH OR WHERE FALL PREVENTION DEVICES ARE PROVIDED PER ASTM F 2090 OR R312.2.2. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS PER IRC R308. SKYLIGHTS TO BE DOUBLE PANEL, SHATTER RESISTANT APPROVED RIGID PLASTIC, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS, FULLY TEMPERED GLASS, HEAT -STRENGTHENED GLASS, OR WIRED GLASS. PROVIDE 4" MINIMUM CURB (OR SELF FLASHING ASSEMBLY WITH 3:12 MINIMUM PITCH OR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS). HOSE BIBBS TO BE BACKFLOW PREVEN1ON AND FREEZE RESISTANT TYPE. ALL HOLDOWNS, FRAMING ANCHORS & SHEARWALL NAILING MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE COVERING. ACCESS PER R807.1 OATTIC 7 22"00" MINIMUM ROUGH FRAMED OPENING LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. INSULATE AND WEATHERSTRIP DOOR. 12" HEIGHT INSULATION DAM. 30" MINIMUM CLEAR HEADROOM. 6'-9" S-6" S-3" TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED & MANUFACTURED PER ANSI/TPI 1. DESIGN BY STATE LICENSED 3'-0" 3'-0" ENGR. & MANUFACTURED AT APPROVED NO OPEN GS NO OPEN GS 2x EDGE BLKG BTWN PLANT. SUBMIT TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS TO 2x LOOKOUTS BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION & SHIP DRAWINGS TO JOB SITE WITH TRUSSES. DESIGN DRAWINGS TO (2) LAYERS INCLUDE ALL LOADS, LUMBER INFO., 2'-0" 2'-0" �" GWB CONNECTIONS, HANGERS, PERMANENT REQ'D. BRACING LOCATIONS, & RELATED INFORMATION MIN. CLR. MIN. CLR. EXTERIOR AS SPECIFIED PER R802.10.1. TRUSSES TO 2x EDGE FINISH BE BRACED TO PREVENT ROTATION & TO BLOCKING Z IJMum PROVIDE LATERAL STABILITY PER TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS, BUILDING PLANS, & PER $ BUILDING LATERAL ENGINEERING. FIELD CUTS (2) LAYERS" GWB OR MODIFICATION OF TRUSSES NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT ENGINEER'S CALCS. / DTLS. AND EXTERIOR FINISH GUTTER & TYP. FASCIA l I PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING 11_6" DEPARTMENT. BOTTOM CHORD OF TRUSSES TO BE HELD OFF OF NON -BEARING INTERIOR TRIPLEX DUPLEX WALLS WITH SIMPSON STC ROOF TRUSS CLIP UNIT C UNIT D OR EQUIVALENT. GABLE END TRUSS TO HAVE VERTICAL MEMBERS 24"o.c. FOR SIDING. GABLE END TRUSS TO BE SHEATHED & NAILED PER WALL BELOW. ROOF 0 ZHANG PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: " = 1'-O" STICK FILL OVER TRUSSES W/ 2x4 HF#2 RAFTERS 0 24"o.c. 4' MAX. SPAN. POST DOWN 0 4'o.c. TO TRUSSES BELOW. STAGGER POSTS OF ADJACENT RAFTERS TO ALT. TRUSSES. 1_ 15'-9" I. 5-6" I. 12'-0" 1_ QA TRUSS SKETCH SCALE: Ys" = 1'-O" ATTIC VENTILATION: ALL VENTS TO BE SCREENED w/ Ya" CORROSION RESISTANT METAL MESH. (3) 2"0 HOLES PER VENT BLOCK = 7.0 SQ. IN. NET AREA (74%). LOCATE VENT BLOCKS AT CORNERS & EVENLY BETWEEN FOR ATTICS. INSTALL VENT BLOCK EA. RAFTER SPACE FOR CATHEDRAL ROOFS. THE MINIMUM NET FREE VENTILATING AREA SHALL BE 1/150 OF THE AREA OF THE VENTED SPACE. EXCEPTION: THE MINIMUM NET FREE VENTILATION AREA SHALL BE 1/300 OF THE VENTED SPACE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING CONDITION IS MET: AT LEAST 40% AND NOT MORE THAN 50% OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATING AREA IS PROVIDED BY VENTILATORS LOCATED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE ATTIC OR RAFTER SPACE. UPPER VENTILATORS SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 3 FEET BELOW THE RIDGE OR HIGHEST POINT OF THE SPACE, MEASURED VERTICALLY, WITH THE BALANCE OF THE REQUIRED VENTILA11ON PROVIDED BY EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS. WHERE THE LOCATION OF WALL OR ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS CONFLICTS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF UPPER VENTILATORS, INSTALLATION MORE THAN 3 FEET BELOW THE RIDGE OR HIGHEST POINT OF THE SPACE SHALL BE PERMITTED. EAVE BAFFLES: FOR AIR PERMEABLE INSULATIONS IN VENTED ATTICS, A BAFFLE SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO SOFFIT AND EAVE VENTS. BAFFLES SHALL MAINTAIN AN OPENING EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE SIZE OF THE VENT. THE BAFFLE SHALL EXTEND OVER THE TOP OF THE ATTIC INSULATION. THE BAFFLE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE ANY SOLID MATERIAL. WSEC.R402.2.3 UNIT D UPPER ATTIC: AREA = 119,511.00 S.I. (829.94 S.F.) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 119,511.00 _ 300 = 398.37 S.I. NET INSTALL 19 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 133 S.I. NET INSTALL 2 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S. I. NET EA. NEAR WALL LINE = 100 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN LOWER PART OF ATTIC = 233 S.I. NET (58.78% TOTAL REQ'D) INSTALL 4 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S.I. NET EA. = 200 S.I. NET (50.20%) TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 433.00 S.I. NET UNIT E UPPER ATTIC: AREA = 119,511.00 S.I. (829.94 S.F.) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 119,511.00 _ 300 = 398.37 S.I. NET INSTALL 21 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 147 S.I. NET INSTALL 2 AF50 ROOF VENTS ® 50 S. I. NET EA. NEAR WALL LINE = 100 S.I. NET VENTILATION IN LOWER PART OF ATTIC = 247 S.I. NET (62.00% TOTAL REQ'D) INSTALL 4 AF50 ROOF VENTS 0 50 S.I. NET EA. = 200 S.I. NET (50.20%) TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 447.00 S.I. NET NOTE: SEE ENGINEER'S "S" SHEETS FOR ALL HEADER & BEAM CALLOUTS. ROOF VENT LEGEND: ® STANDARD AF50 VENT JACK 50 SQ. INCHES OR 0.347 SQ. FT. L6J 6" x 6" ROOF VENT FOR BATH & UTILITY FANS UNITS D GARAGE ATTIC: AREA = 8,640.00 S.I. (60.00 S.F.) 8,640.00 _ 150 = 57.60 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 2 VENT BLOCKS* 0 7 S.I. NET EA. = 14 S.I. NET INSTALL 1 AF50 ROOF VENT 50 9 S.I. NET EA. _ 50 S.I. NET TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 64.00 S.I. NET UNIT E GARAGE ATTIC: AREA = 6,912.00 S.I. (48.00 S.F.) 6,912.00 ; 150 = 46.08 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 6 VENT BLOCKS* ® 7 S.I. NET EA. = 42 S.I. NET INSTALL 12 FT CONTINUOUS WALL VENT ® 9 S.I. NET EA. = 108 S.I. NET TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 150.00 S.I. NET UNITS D&E FRONT PORCH ATTIC: AREA = 1,624.00 S.I. (11.28 S.F.) 1,624.00 ; 150 = 10.83 S.I. VENTILATION REQ'D INSTALL 2 VENT BLOCKS* 0 7 S.I. NET EA. = 14 S.I. NET TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 14.00 S.I. NET *BIRD BLOCK VENTING - (3) 2"0 HOLES PER 24" BAY = 7.068 S.I. OR .0492 S.F. NET cr 0 �n LLI rI VU Z Lo Lu U `" N Z � Do Q J n (j ro 0 Z Q rn �U J Q m F_ n 06 w �J WOf 0 w E:) 7 0E-: N o W Z Wwo � J o a Q .21 0 LO 3 U °' 3 o a o 0 T m w a U) Of 0 w o- in 0 t 0 H aD Lo Lo 0 0 m 0 N z J a c t V Q 06 0 0- (D c E bd bd Q LL O or-' �z w O o' w Nz w = �a X =� 0 W o ` Z J W JJ Q Q W Z O c.i F— 00Z a o O N L� I OJ 0CD W IN r w on U J5/ of i7 Packet Pg. 280 1Y4"-2" O CONT. FULL- LENGTH HANDRAIL WITH 1Y2" MIN. SPACE TO WALL OR TERMINATE AT POST. HANDRAIL TO SUPPORT 200 LB. LOAD APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION. PLANT SHELF 6" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS THRU TRIANGLE 200 I 200 I 3'-0" MIN. lo WIDTH OF LANDINGS NOT TO BE LESS THAN THE STAIRWAY SERVED. 36" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL a 42" HALF WALL o OPT. OPEN RAIL I SPACE PICKETS SO 4%" SPHERE <.D MAY NOT PASS 1 --i� �° PLWD. FACE - NAIL TO DBL JSTS & STRINGERS 10" MIN. AT 12" FROM -,--- NARROWEST SIDE, BUT BUT NOT LESS THAN 6" J � � —2x TREADS 1x RISERS FIRESTOP ADJACENT WALLS PER R602.8 Y" MINIMUM & %4" MAXIMUM NOSING FIREPROTECT ENCLOSED UNDER STAIR WALLS & SOFFITS W/ 1/2" GWB WINDING STAIR PER IRC R311.5 STAIR DETAIL SCALE: %"=1'-O" JOISTS FRAMING FROM OPPOSITE SIDES OVER A BEARING SUPPORT SHALL LAP A MINIMUM OF 3 3/4" APA T&G OSB OR INCHES AND SHALL BE NAILED TOGETHER WITH A PLYWD. CD INT. w/ EXT. MINIMUM THREE 10d FACE NAILS. SOLID BLOCKING GLUE. NAIL w/ 10d ® 6" O.C. SHALL BE PROVIDED AS LATERAL RESTRAINT AT EDGES & SOLID BLKG. & ® EACH INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT. TOE NAIL JOISTS 10" O.C. IN FIELD AND BLOCKING TO BEAM w/ (3)8d. FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN BEAM -COLUMN CONNECT 2x4 OR 2x6 TIES w/ 2-16d OR METAL CONNECTOR BEAMS & COLUMNS x ® BEAM & COLUMN PER FOUNDATION PLAN. TYPICAL EA. SIDE COLUMN BASE UP 8" OR APROTECT USE PRESSURE TREATED COLUMN BASE �� w/ TYPE 90 ROOFING CONCRETE FOOTING PER FOUNDATION PLAN COLUMN -FOOTING ANCHOR INTERIOR GRADE w/ MASB OR EQUIV. INT. BEARING SUPPORT WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE:" = 1'-0" PREFAB MONO PITCH TRUSS PITCH PER ELEVATION (GIRDER TRUSS SIMILAR) (2) LAYERS" GWB J HANGER PER TRUSS ENGINEER PREFAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES 0 24" O.C. (U.N.O.) ROOFING PER PLAN Z WIND BAFFLE W/ 1" MIN. AIR SPACE N o SIMPSON H2.5A OR H1 EACH J ¢ 12 TRUSS TO TOP PLATES SEE 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK R-49 IN UL. PLAN �V GWB OR W/ SIMPSON RBC ® 48" O.C. TO TOP PLATES SAG RESISTANT 8d GALV. ®6" O.C. 2-2x6 TOP PLATES (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) LAP SPLICES 48" z 4x HEADER PER PLAN. 26 GA. CONT. 2" R-10 FOAM BOARD PER ALUM. GUTTER INSULATION REQUIRED. TYPICAL FASCIA 1/2" G.W.B. SIDING PER ELEV. 0/ TYPE N 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF R-21 INSULATION BUILDING PAPER NAIL KRAFT PAPER FACE TO FREE EDGE OF STUD OR PROVIDE 4 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER SCISSOR TRUSS SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: Y8" = 1'-0" NOTE NAIL DRYWALL w/ 6d DRYWALL NAILS. 1Y" DRYWALL SCRW 7"o.c. TYPICAL THROUGHOUT-UNBLOCKD. BREAK FLOOR SHTHG. AT PARTY WALL w/ TIGHT FITTING FIRE STOP MIN. REQ. STC = 50 STC = 57 AS SHOWN BREAK FLOOR SHTHG. AT PARTY WALL w/ TIGHT FITTING FIRE STOP O'011111M0 II'iIII CRAWL SPACE PER WALL SECT. PREFAB ROOF TRUSSES ® 24" O.C. SPECIAL TRUSS W/ VERT. WEBS 24" O.C. %" TYPE 'X' GWB ON BOTH SIDES TO ROOF SHEATHING GWB OR SAG RESISTANT 1'2" GWB FIRESTOP PER R602.8 DOUBLE PARTY WALL 2x4 STUDS ® 16"o.c. w/ 1" SPACE BTWN. W' 'X' GWB EA. SIDE R-15 INSUL. (1 SIDE) J¢" RIGID SOUND BD (1) SIDE IN SPACE " TYPE 'X' GWB ON EA 2x RIM JOIST (BOTH UNITS) RR JSTS.. PER PLAN GWB J FIRESTOP PER R602.8 DOUBLE PARTY WALL 2x4 STUDS ® 16"o.c. w/ 1" SPACE BTWN. V" 'X' GWB EA. SIDE R-15 INSUL. (1 SIDE) Y2" RIGID SOUND BD (1) SIDE IN SPACE " TYPE 'X' GWB ON EA 2x RIM JOIST (BOTH UNITS) 2x4 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE w/ )CO A.B. ® 48"o.c. OR PER PLAN & BTWN. 02" & 12" OF SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MIN. INSTALL 304" PLATE WASHERS. PARTY WALL DETAIL SCALE: 3/$" = 1'-0" PROVIDE MINIMUM CLASS C ROOF COVERING, ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR APPROVED FIRE -RETARDANT -TREATED WOOD FOR A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS, OR ONE LAYER OF %" TYPE X GWB INSTALLED DIRECTLY BENEATH THE ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING FOR A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS PER R317.2.2. VENT BLOCKS TO BE SCREENED WITH DOUBLE LAYER OF Y" GALVANIZED METAL MESH w/IN 4 FEET OF EACH SIDE OF WALL. NO ROOF PENETRATIONS ALLOWED w/IN 5 FEET OF EACH SIDE OF WALL. 1 LAYER" TYPE X GWB EACH SIDE OF EACH WALL SEE DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION DETAIL TRUSS Q COMMON WALL WHERE SCALE: 3/$"=1'-O" APPLICABLE PREAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES ® 24" O.C. (U.N.O.) ROOFING PER PLAN WIND BAFFLE W/ 1" MIN. AIR SPACE SIMPSON H2.5A OR H1 EACH 12 TRUSS TO TOP PLATES 1-1! SEE m PLAN 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK R-49 INSULATION 8d GALV. ® 6" O.C. (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) W" GWB OR SAG RESISTANT )f GWB 2-26 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48' HEADER PER PLAN. USE 2" FOAM BOARD W/ 4x HEADER N' G.W.B. R-21 INSUL. 2x6 STUDS ® 16" O.C. -Y;" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ 10d 0 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID BLKG. & 0 10" O.C. IN FIELD SOLID BLKG. FLOOR JSTS PER PLAN 0 SUPPORTS Y2" G.W.B. - 2-2x6 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48' HEADER PER PLAN. USE 2" FOAM BOARD W/ 4x HEADER Y2" G.W.B. R-21 INSUL. 2x6 STUDS 0 16" O.C. " APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ 10d 0 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID BLKG. & 0 10" O.C. IN FIELD SOLID BLKG. O SUPPORTS FLOOR JSTS PER PLAN PER 18" MIN. CLEARANCE STEM WALL & FTG.J °O 12" MIN UNDER BEAMS PER PLAIN CONCRETE FOUNDATION DETAIL ii R-30 INSULATION INSUL. PLUMBING & MECH. - GUTTER TYPICAL FASCIA SIDING PER ELEVATION 0/ TYPE 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER 2x6 BASE PL. W/ 16d 0 16" O.C. TO JST & 2-16d EA STUD 2x RIM JOIST W/ 3-16d EACH JOIST " T-1-11 PLYWD OR Y2" CDX PLYWOOD SHTG OR 3s' O.S.B. NAIL 8d 6" O.C. EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD OR PER ENGINEER'S S.W. SCHEDULE. 2x6 BASE PL. W/ 16d ® 16" O.C. TO JST & 2-16d EA STUD 2x RIM JOIST W/ 3-16d EACH JOIST 2x4 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE W/ N 0 A.B. ® 48" O.C. OR PER PLAN & BTWN. 4N' & 12" OF SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MINIMUM. INSTALL 3x3xY4 PLATE WASHERS. FINISHED GRADE SLOPED FOR 6" MIN. FALL WITHIN 10' OR PROVIDE SWALE OR DRAIN. � ROOF DRAIN 4" TIGHTLINE MIL BLACK POLY BARRIER. 02" 6" 4 SEPARATE FROM FTG. DRAIN LAP EDGES 12" MINIMUM 4"0 PERF PIPE IN 1'-3L WASHED GRAVEL. CONNECT TO APPROVED TWO STORY SECTION DISCHARGE WHERE SCALE: %"=1'-O" APPLICABLE PREFAB. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES PER PLAN ® 24"o/c ROOFING PER PLAN 12 SIMPSON H1 EACH TRUSS SEE TO TOP PLATES PLAN 2x SCREENED VENT BLOCK 8d GALV. ® 6" o/c (DIAPH. TO TOP PLS.) (2)2x4 TOP PLATES LAP SPLICES 48'. GUTTER PLATE HEIGHT PER PER TYPICAL FASCIA ELEVATION SIDING PER ELEVATION 0/ HEADER PER PLAN TYPE 15 FELT OR WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER 2x4 #2 H.F. STUDS ® 16' o c STRL. MEMBERS 0 BE 12 HEM/FIR OR BETTER. 3fe OSB, Y2" CDX PLYWOOD OR T-1-11 SHEATHING. NAIL 8d 6" ON EDGE, 12" IN FIELD 2x4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. OR PER ENGINEER'S S.W. SCHEDULE 20 PRESS. TRTD. SILL PLATE 2x4 BASE PLATE W/ 1 nO A.B. 0 48" O.C. OR PER PLAN & BTWN. 4Y" & 12" 4" CONC. SLAB ON SAND OF SILL ENDS. EMBED 7" MIN. LL &TAMP AS REQUIRED _ 3x3xO.229" PLATE WASHERS. co FINISHED GRADE SLOPED FOR iii- 6" MIN. FALL WITHIN 10' OR z -M_ u' SEE CONC. FTG. & STEM --i {; r PROVIDE SWALE OR DRAIN. WALL DETAIL ON THIS SHEET L6 11'° Q - ROOF DRAIN 4" TIGHTLINE SEPARATE FROM FTG. DRAIN 3 6" 3" 4"0 PERF PIPE IN 1'-0" ONE STORY WASHED GRAVEL. 1'-3" TWO STORY CONNECT TO APPROVED DISCHARGE STORAGE WALL SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: �" = 1'-0" GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS & BUILDING DIMENSIONS, & SHALL REPORT ANY VARIATIONS TO THE DESIGNER FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE CtfESSCkDD'INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (IRC), 2015 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE (WSEC), 2015 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (UPC), 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC), AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. STRUCTURAL: SEISMIC ZONE D1/D2 PER FIG. R301.2(2) & ENGINEERING WIND (EXP. B) BASIC SPEED: 85 MPH PER FIG. R301.2(4) COMPONENT/CLADDING LOADS /TABLE R301.2(2) TABLE R301.5 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS LOADING LIVE DEAD TOTAL ROOF (GROUND SNOW) 25 PSF 10 PSF 35 PSF UNINHABITABLE ATTICS - NO STORAGE 10 PSF 10 PSF 20 PSF UNINHABITABLE ATTICS - LIMITED STORAGE 20 PSF 10 PSF 30 PSF HABITABLE ATTICS &ATTICS w/ FIXED STAIRS 30 PSF 10 PSF 40 PSF BALCONIES (EXTERIOR) AND DECKS 60 PSF 10 PSF 70 PSF FIRE ESCAPES 40 PSF GUARDRAILS/HANDRAILS 200 LBS AT TOP ANY DIRECTION GUARDRAILS IN -FILL 50 LBS APPLIED TO 1 SO. FT. PASSENGER VEHICHLE GARAGES 50 PSF IF ELEVATED 2,000 LB PT. ROOMS OTHER THAN SLEEPING ROOMS 40 PSF 10 PSF 50 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS 30 PSF 10 PSF 40 PSF STAIRS 40 PSF 10 PSF 50 PSF OR 300 LB PT. LOAD ON 4 SO. IN. ALL BEAMS, GIRDERS, HEADERS, RAFTERS, & JOISTS TO BE HEM FIR NO. 2 OR BETTER AS NOTED ON PLANS. GLUED LAMINATED TIMBERS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED & IDENTIFIED AS REQUIRED IN AITC A190.1 & ASTM D3737. PLYWOOD INDEX: CO. ROOF & SUBFLOOR SHEATHING PER TABLE R503.2.1.1(1). WALL SHEATHING PER TABLE R602.3(3) & R602.3(4). SHEATHING FASTENERS PER TABLES R602.3(1) & (2). STRUCTURAL MEMBER FASTENERS PER TABLE R602.3(1). WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE, NEAR GROUND, OR WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR NATURALLY DURABLE WOOD PER R317. CONCRETE & REBAR: REBAR TO BE 60.000 PSI - GRADE 60 ASTM A706. WALL REBAR SHALL BE PLACED NO CLOSER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE THAN Y2 THE WALL THICKNESS. REBAR COVER PER ACI 318. FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON 1500 PSF MINIMUM UNDISTURBED SOIL. CONCRETE TO BE MINIMUM F'c = 2500 PSI ® 28 DAYS (3,000 PSI FOR GARAGE/CARPORT SLABS, EXTERIOR PATIO SLABS ON GRADE, & WEATHER EXPOSED BASEMENT, FOUNDATION WALLS, PORCHES, AND STEPS W/ 5%-7% AIR ENTRAINMENT). MINIMUM DESIGN EQUIV. FLUID PRESSURE = 35 PCF OR PER SOILS ANALYSIS. USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS OF EQUIVALENT STRENGTH MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SIMPSON HOLDOWNS, STRAPS, AND CONNECTORS ROOFING OPTIONS: O SHAKE/SHINGLE ROOF: INTERWV. w/ 18" WIDE STRIPS OF TYPE 30 FELT. NAIL w/ (2) GALV. FASTENERS PER EACH PIECE TO 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING OR EQUIVALENT. PROVIDE 1/2" CCX PLYWOOD SHEATHING ® OVERHANGS. 00 COMPOSITION ROOF: 0/ NONPERFD. TYPE 15 FELT. NAIL w/ (4) GALV. FASTN'R PER EA PIECE 0/ 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHTG. OR EQUIV. w/ 1/2" CCX ® 0/HANGS. O CONCRETE TILE ROOF: 0/ TYPE 30 FELT. NAIL w/ (2) GALV. FASTENERS PER EA PIECE OVER 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHTG. OR EQUIV. w/ 1/2" CCX 0 0/ HANGS. O METAL ROOF: INSTALL PER MFG. SPECS. 0/ TYPE 15 FELT 0/ 1/2" CDX PLYWD SHEATHING OR EQUIVALENT w/ 1/2" CCX PLYWOOD SHEATHING ® 0/HANGS. 00 ROOF SHTG. TO BE NAILED w/ 8d 0 6" OC EDGES & 12" OC FIELD - UNBLKD. TYP. 2x6 WALL 3/4" APA T&G OSB OR PLYWD. CD INT. W/ EXT. GLUE. NAIL W/ 1Od ® 6" O.C. EDGES & SOLID BLOCKING & ® 10" O.C. IN FIELD SOLID BLOCKING FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN " T-1-11 PLYWD OR Y2" CDX PLYWOOD SHTG OR 3s' O.S.B. NAIL 8d 6" O.C. EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD OR PER ENGINEER'S SHEARWALL SCHEDULE 2x6 BASE PLATE 2x RIM JOIST N' CCX PLYWOOD SHTG. OR �s" O.S.B. SOFFIT 2-2x6 TOP PLATES R-30 INSUL. W/ VAPOR LAP SPLICES 48' PER RETARDER WARM SIDE CANTILEVER WILL BEAR PLAN ON FRAMED WALL OR ff— FOUNDATION WALL CANTILEVER SECTION WHERE APPLICABLE SCALE: 1'-0" CONTINUOUS #4 HORIZ. BAR 6" TO BE LOCATED 6" BELOW MAIN TOP OF WALL�I n REINFORCING TO BE 60 KSI MINIMUM. #4 FULL WALL HEIGHT VERTICAL AT EACH CORNER, INTERSECTION, AND ENDS OF WALL, (2) #5 AROUND OPENINGS EXTENDING 24" BEYOND EDGE OF OPENING. REBAR GRADE 00 - #4 BAR W/ 12d MINIMUM X HORIZONTAL 3" MIN. EXTENSION 4"0 ROOF o STD. HOOK DRAIN 4"0 PERF. FTG. DRAIN z 2" z IN GRAVEL MIN. II 00 If II M 000MN = M U IF FOOTING POURED SEPARATELY, CONTIN. #4 HORIZ. BAR PROVIDE #4 BAR 48" O.C. MAX. 3"-4" FROM BOT. OF FTG. WITH STD. HOOK. EXTEND TO 3" CLR. FROM BOT. OF FTG. ROTATE 1'-0" MIN. 1 STORY HORIZ. EXTENSION PARALLEL TO 1'-3" MIN. 2 STORY WALL FOR PROPER CONC. COVER. V-11" MIN. 3 STORY CONIC. FTG. & STEM WALL SCALE: Y2" = 1'-0" cr o W � r V� Z Lo LLI U `o N Z 't Do Q v J (j 0 Z N -i rn �U J m � n 05 w �J W > 0 w 0 F-: r) o W z 0 W O J o a Q O Lo 3 U rn 0 0- 04 o I I r- T 3 T z r o 3- m uj a Of w W IJJ L -i Qcfl z N cy) 00 co N Q I ��o 00 vi n N Z Lo L� 0) O N N 0 00 Lu Li- O or-' Mz W O > Wo wz �a X W OW W` Z Jw J —i J Q �W z I O c.i F- 00 z o O N W o? J H Co 0 U d O t s= 3 0 t- aD s= cn Lo Lo 0 0 m 0 N z J a C aD t V fC Q 06 O Iz c m t a Packet Pg. 281 GENERAL MECHANICAL PROVISIONS: HEATING &COOLING EQUIPMENT: THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES USED FOR HEATING AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 72-F (22'C) FOR HEATING AND MINIMUM OF 75-F (24'C) FOR COOLING PER R302.1. THE HEATING OR COOLING OUTDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES SHALL BE SELECTED FROM APPENDIX C PER R302.2 WSEC. HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL S BASED ON BUILDING LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION METHODOLOGIES PER R403.7 WSEC. SSY}STEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS SHAL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS C403 AND 9P�tI�NTHKNgWPLI�WA�I�'RW MOM (Y,��TW IDEA dARME 9� BE ELEVATED SO THAT THE SOURCE OF IGNITION IS NOT LESS THAN 18 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR SURFACE PER IMC SECTION 304.3. POTABLE WATER HEATERS AND HOT WATER STORAGE TANKS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE. AL WATER HEATERS SHAL BE CAPABLE OF BEING REMOVED WITHOUT FIRST REMOVING A PERMANENT PORTION OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE. THE POTABLE WATER CONNECTIONS AND RELIEF VALVES FOR AL WATER HEATERS SHAL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE. DOMESTIC ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 174 OR UL 1453. OIL -FIRED WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 732. SOLID -FUEL -FIRED WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 2523. THERMAL SOLAR WATER HEATERS SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER MEQ� PNIN64ERBIf� Af5lf @GP/ftd�'�VITIA2-*E BUILDING ENVELOPE TO BE PROVIDED WITH COMBUSTION AIR PER THE INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE IFGC). FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHAL CO PLY WITH IMC 303.6. FUEL -FIRED FURNACE OR SERVICE WATER HEATER SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN OR OBTAIN COMBUSTION AIR FROM A BEDROOM BATHROOM TOILET ROOM OR CLOSET. EXCEPTIONS: 1. DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES THAT OBTAIN' AL COMBUSTION AIR DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS. 2. SOLID FUEL -FIRED APPLIANCES PROVIDED THAT THE ROOM IS NOT A CONFINED SPACE AND THE BUILDING IS NOT OF UNUSUALLY TIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 3. APPLIANCES INSTALLED IN A DEDICATED ENCLOSURE IN WHICH ALL COMBUSTION AIR IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS PER CHAPTER 7 IMC. THE ENCLOSURE SHALL HAVE A WEATHER-STRIPPED SOLID DOOR. CENTRAL FURNACES TO BE INSTALLED IN CLOSETS, OR CONFINED SPACES SUCH AS ALCOVES, SHAL HAVE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS LISTING SUCH LOCATIONS AS ACCEPTABLE. FURNACES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER IMC 306.1.1. FURNACES WITH A FIREBOX OPEN TO THE ATMOSPHERE SHALLL HAVE IA,T�LEAST 6" WORKING SPACE ALONG THE FRONT �� .)*MNMVLTS't2 �G§PAMGSAVELtMPQq W� I�fC PROPANE GAS -BURNING APPLIANCES SHAL NOT BE INSTALLED IN A PIT, BASEMENT, OR SIMILAR LOCATION WHERE HEAVIER THAN AIR GAS MIGHT COLLECT. THE APPLIANCES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN AN ABOVE GRADE, UNDER FLOOR SPACE OR BASEMENT, UNLESS SUCH LOCATION IS PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS FOR REMOVAL OF UNBURNED GAS (APPROVAL MUST BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT). CHIMNEYS AND VENTS: EVERY APPLIANCE DESIGNED TO BE VENTED SHALL BE CONNECTED TO A VENTING SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH CHAPTER 8 OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC). EVERY FACTORY BUILT CHIMNEY, TYPE L VENT, TYPE B GAS VENT, OR TYPE BW GAS VENT SHAL BE INSTALLED PER ITS MANUFACTURER'S LISTING, INSTRUCTIONS, AND APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8 IMC. GAS VENTS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 5 OF THE INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE (IFGC). GAS VENTS SHALL TERMINATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. GGAS VENTS WITH AN INTERNAL DIAMETER OF 12" OR LESS AND ARE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 8' FROM A VERTICAL WALL OR SIMILAR OBSTRUCTION SHALL TERMINATE ABOVE THE ROOF IN ACCORDANCE WITH IFGC FIGURE 503.6.4. AS PROVIDED FOR DIRECT -VENT SYSTEMS IN IFGC SECTION 503.2.3. AS PROVIDED FOR APPLIANCES WITH INTEGRAL VENTS IN IFGC SECTION 503.2.4. AS PROVIDED FOR MECHANICAL DRAFT SYSTEMS IN IFGC SECTION 503.3.3. AS PROVIDED FOR VENTILATING HOODS AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS PER IFGC 503.3.4. MINIMUM HEIGHT PER IFGC 503.6.5. A TYPE B OR L GAS VENT SHALL TERMINATE AT LEAST 5 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE HIGHEST CONNECTED APPLIANCE DRAFT HOOD OR FLUE COLLAR. A TYPE B-W GAS VENT SHALL TERMINATE AT LEAST 12 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL FURNACE. TYPE L VENTING SYSTEMS SHALL TERMINATE NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET ABOVE THE ROOF THROUGH WHICH IT PASSES, NOR LESS THAN 2 FEET ABOVE ANY ANY PORTION OF THE BUILDING WITHIN 10'-0" PER SECTION 802.5 IMC. VENT CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED TO CONNECT APPLIANCES TO THE VERTICAL CHIMNEY OR VENT PER IMC 803, EXCEPT WHERE THE CHIMNEY OR VENT IS ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE APPLIANCE. CONNECTORS SHALL BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE ROOM IN WHICH THE APPLIANCE IS LOCATED, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 803.10.4. WHERE PASSING THROUGH AN UNHEATED SPACE, A CONNECTOR SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OF SINGLE -WALL PIPE. THE CONNECTOR SHAL NOT BE SMALLER THAN THE SIZE OF THE FLUE COLAR SUPPLIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE APPLIANCE. CONNECTORS SHAL RISE VERTICALLY TO THE CHIMNEY OR VENT WITH A MINIMUM PITCH EQUAL TO ONE-FOURTH UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (2% SLOPE). T . S I _ k�IINIMUM CLEARANCE TO COMBUSTIBLES IN ACCORDANCE G ND DUCTS PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILING SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NO. 26 GAUGE MINIMUM SHEET STEEL OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL AND SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS INTO THE G RAGE. M CHANICAL &WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC CH. 15 (WAM CHANICAL &WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC CH. 15 (WA AMENDMENTS) IRC SECTION M1501.1 OUTDOOR DISCHARGE. THE AIR REMOVED BY EVERY MECHANICAL SYSTEM SHAL BE DISCHARGED TO THE OUTDOORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION M1506.2. AIR SHALL NOT BE WXHAUSTED INTO AN ATTIC, SOFFIT, RIDGE VENT OR CRAWL SPACE. EXCEPTION: WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION -TYPE ATTIC FANS THAT DISCHARGE INTO THE ATTIC SPACE OF DWELLING UNITS HAVING PRIVATE ATTICS SHALL BE PERMITTED. IRC SECTION M1502 CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST IRC M1502.1 GENERAL. CLOTHES DRYERS SHALL BE EXHAUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. IRC 1502.2 INDEPENDENTENT EXHAUST SYSTEMS. DRYER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF AL OTHER SYSTEMS AND SHAL CONVEY THE MOISTURE TO THE OUTDOORS. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO LISTED AND LABELED CONDENSING * �}3 WMEfENPI ON. EXHAUST DUCTS SHAL TERMINATE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. EXHAUST DUCT TERMINATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRYER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. IF THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS DO NOT SPECIFY A TERMINATION LOCATION, THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL TERMINATE NOT LESS THAN 3 FEET IN ANY DIRECTION FROM OPENINGS INTO BUILDINGS. EXHAUST DUCT TERMINATIONS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BACKDRAFT DAMPER. SCREENS SHALL NOT BE ffiTA�M.k.3 ,ELT AAB^ 45kYER EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH INTERIOR FINISH AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF METAL A MINIMUM 0.0157-INCH THICK (#28 GA). THE EXHAUST DUCT SIZE SHALL BE 4 INCHES NOMINAL IN DIAMETER. M1502.4.2 DUCT INSTALLATION. EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL BE SUPPORTED AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 12 FEET AND SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE. THE INSERT END OF THE DUCT SHALL EXTEND INTO THE ADJOINING DUCT OR FITTING IN THE DIRECTION OF AIRFLOW. EXHAUST DUCT JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION M1601.4.1 AND SHAL BE MECHANICALLY FASTENED. DUCTS SHAL NOT BE JOINED WITH SCREWS OR SIMILAR FASTENERS THAT PROTRUDE MORE THAN 1 8 INCH INTO THE INSIDE OF THE DUCT. / IIRC M1502.4.3 TRANSITION DUCT. TRANSITION DUCTS USED TO CONNECT THE DRYER TO THE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM SHALL BE A SINGLE LENGTH THAT IS LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 2158A. TRANSITION DUCTS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET IN LENGTH. TRANSITION DUCTS SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED WITHIN CONSTRUCTION. M1502.4.4 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATORS. DOMESTIC DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATORS SHAL CONFORM TO UL 705 FOR USE IN DRYER EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEMS. THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATOR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANSE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. M1502.4.5 DUCT LENGTH. THE MAXIMUM ALOWABLE EXHAUST DUCT LENGTHSHALL BE DETERMINED BY ONE OGF THE METHODS SPECIFIED IN SECTIONS M1502.4.5.1 THROUGH MJ§0:0:0•SPECIFIED LENGTH. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE 35 FEET FROM THE CONNECTION TO THE TRANSITION DUCT FROM THE DRYER TO THE OUTLET TERMINAL. WHERE FITTINGS ARE USED, THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE REDUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1502.4.5.1. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE TRANSITION DUCT. IRC M1502.4.5.1 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT FITTING EQUIVALENT LENGTH DRYER EXHAUST DUCT FITTING TYPE EQUIVALENT LENGTH 4" RADIUS MITERED 45-DEGREE ELBOW 2'-6" 4" RADIUS MITERED 90-DEGREE ELBOW 5'-0" 6" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-0" 6" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-9" 8" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-0" 8" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-7" 10" RADIUS SMOOTH 45-DEGREE ELBOW 9" 10" RADIUS SMOOTH 90-DEGREE ELBOW 1'-6" FOR SI: 1 INCH = 25.4 MM, 1 FOOT = 304.8 MM, 1 DEGREE = 0.0175 RAD. M1502.4.5.2 MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. THE SIZE AND MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DRYER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. THE CODE OFFICIAL SHAL BE PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MAKE AND MODEL OF THE DRYER AT THE CONCEALMENT INSPECTION. IN THE ABSENCE OF FITTING EQUIVALENT LENGTH CALCULATIONS FROM THE DRYER M ..QQNR§RYET�k*M)§��LfI f § igOkgOR. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. M1502.4.5.3 DRYER EXHAUST DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DUCT POWER VENTILATOR. M1502.4.6 LENGTH IDENTIFICATION. WHERE THE EXHAUST DUCT EQUIVALENT LENGTH EXCEES 35 FEET, THE EQUIVALENT LENGTH OF THE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON A PERMANENT LABEL OR TAG LOCATED WITHIN 6 FEET OF THE EXHAUST DUCT CONNECTION. M1502.4.7 EXHAUST DUCT REQUIRED. WHERE SPACE FOR A CLOTHES DRYER IS PROVIDED AN EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED. WHERE THE CLOTHES DRYER IS NOT INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF OCCUPANCY THE EXHAUST DUCT SHAL BE CAPPED OR PLUGGED IN THE SPACE IN WHICH IT ORIGINATES AND IDENTIFIED AND MARKED "FUTURE USE.' EXCEPTION: WHERE A LISTED CONDENSING CLOTHES DRYER IS INSTALLED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE STRUCTURE. M1502.5 PROTECTION REQUIRED. PROTECTIVE SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE PLACED WHERE NAILS OR SCREWS FROM FINISH OR OTHER WORK ARE LIKELY TO PENETRATE THE CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST DUCT, SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FINISHED FACE OF FRANING MEMBERS WHERE THERE IS LESS THAN 1Y4 INCHES BETWEEN THE DUCT AND THE FINISHED FACE OF THE FRAMING MEMBER. PROTECTIVE SHIELD PLATES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL, HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 0.062 INCH AND SHALL NOT EXTEND LESS THAN 2 INCHES ABOVE SOLE PLATES AND BELOW TOP PLATES. COPYRIGHT ©2016 DESIGN LINES, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE USE OF THIS SHEET IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE CLIENTS OF DESIGN LINES, INC. AND ONLY FOR THE PARTICULAR PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PRINTS WERE ISSUED. USE OR REUSE OF THIS SHEET FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN AND SUBJECT TO PENALTY OF LAW. WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC 1507 (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT M1507.1 GENERAL. LOCAL EXHAUST AND WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND E UIPMENT SHAL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. Q M1507.2 RECIRCULATION OF AIR. EXHAUST AIR FROM BATHROOMS AND TOILET ROOMS SHALL NOT BE RECIRCULATED WITHIN A RESIDENCE OR TO ANOTHER DWELLING UNIT AND SHALL BE EXHAUSTED DIRECTLY TO THE OUTDOORS. EXHAUST AIR FROM BATHROOMS AND TOILET ROOMS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO AN ATTIC CRAWL SPACE OR OTHER AREAS OF THE W66M.1 SYSTEM DESIGN. EACH DWELLING UNIT OR GUESTROOM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH SECTION M1507.3.4, M1507.3.5, M1507.3.6 OR M1507.3.7. COMPLIANCE IS ALSO PERMITTED TO BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE OR ASHRAE STANDARD 62.2. M1507.3.2 CONTROL AND OPERATION. 1. LOCATION OF CONTROLS. CONTROLS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHAL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE OCCUPANT. 2. INSTRUCTIONS. OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OCCUPANT BY THE INSTALER OF THE SYSTEM. 3. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY MANUAL SWITCHES DEHUMIDISTATS TIMERS OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. 4. CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS. CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY. EXHAUST FANS, FORCED -AIR SYSTEM FANS, OR SUPPLY FANS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH "FAN ON" AS OVERRIDE CONTROLS. CONTROLS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE VENTILATION SYSTEM WITHOUT ENERGIZING OTHER ENERGY -CONSUMING APPLIANCES. A LABEL SHALL BE AFFIXED TO THE CONTROLS THAT READS "WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION (SEE OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS)." 5. INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS. INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLOWING: 5.1. THEY SHAL BE CAPABLE OF OPERATING INTERMITTENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY. 5.2. THEY SHALL HAVE CONTROLS CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE EXHAUST FANS, FORCED -AIR SYSTEM FANS, OR SUPPLY FANS WITHOUT ENERGIZING OTHER ENERGY -CONSUMING APPLIANCES. 5.3. THE VENTILATION RATE SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 403.8.5.1. 5.4. THE SYSTEM SHAL BE DESIGNED SO THAT IT CAN OPERATE AUTOMATICALLY BASED ON THE TYPE OF CONTROL TIMER INSTALLED. 5.5. THE INTERMITTENT MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM SHALL OPERATE AT LEAST ONE HOUR OUT OF EVERY FOUR. 5.6. THE SYSTEM SHAL HAVE A MANUAL CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL, SUCH AS A 24-HOUR CLOCK TIMER. 5.7. AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION, THE AUTOMATIC CONTROL SHALL BE SET TO OPERATE THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE USED TO CALCULATE THE WHOLE -HOUSE FAN SIZING. iTMI�JSC E PA LBfif�I60VLf Iu WgAG ICON RATE EXCEPTION: THE WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM IS PERMITTED TO OPERATE INTERMITTENTLY WHERE THE SYSTEM HAS CONTROLS THAT ENABLE OPERATION FOR NOT LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF EACH 4-HOUR SEGMENT AND THE VENTILATION RATE PRESCRIBED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) IS MULTIPLIED BY THE FACTOR DETERMINED IN ACC DWELLING UNIT FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) BEDROOMS 0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 >7 AIRFLOW IN CFM < 1500 30 45 60 75 90 1501-3000 45 60 75 90 105 3001-4500 60 75 90 105 120 4501-6000 75 90 105 120 135 6001-7500 90 105 120 135 150 > 7501 105 120 135 150 165 TABLE IRC M1507.3.3(1) CONTINUOUS WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM AIRFLOW RATE REQUIREMENTS FOR SI: 1 SQUARE FOOT = 0.0929M , 1 CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE = 0.0004719M'/s TABLE M1507.3.3(2) INTERMITTENT WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION RATE FACTORS°b RUN-TIME PERCENTAGE IN EACH 4-HOUR ° 25% 33% 50% 66% 75% 100% SEGMENT FACTOR° 4 3 2 1.5 1.3 1 a. FOR VENTILATION SYSTEM RUN TIME VALUES BETWEEN THOSE GIVEN, THE FACTORS ARE PERMITTED TO BE DETERMINED BY INTERPOLATION. b. EXTRAPOLATION BEYOND THE TABLE IS PROHIBITED. METHOD 1 IRC M1507.3.4 WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING EXHAUST FANS. M1507.3.41 WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION FANS. EXHAUST FANS PROVIDING WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SHAL HAVE A FLOW RATING AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1). MANUFACTURERS' FAN FLOW RATINGS SHAL BE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO HVI 916 OR AMCA 210. M1507.3.4.2 FAN NOISE. WHOLE HOUSE FANS LOCATED 4 FEET OR LESS FROM THE INTERIOR GRILLE SHAL HAVE A SONE RATING OF 1.0 OR LESS MEASURED AT 0.1 INCHES WATER GAUGE. MANUFACTURER'S NOISE RATINGS SHAL BE DETERMINED AS PER HVI 915 (MARCH 2O09). REMOTELY MOUNTED FANS SHALL BE ACOUSTICALY ISOLATED FROM THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING AND FROM ATTACHED DUCT WORK USING INSULATED FLEXIBLE DUCT OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL. M1507.3.4.3 FAN CONTROLS. THE WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION FAN SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION M1507.3.2 AND M1507.3.2.1. M1507.3.4.4 VENTILATION OPENINGS. EACH HABITABLE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH OUTDOOR AIR INLETS OR OPERABLE WINDOWS WITH AN OPENABLE AREA NOT LESS THAN 4 SQUARE INCHES OF NET FREE AREA OF OPENING FOR EACH 10 CFM OF OUTDOOR AIR REQUIRED BY TABLE M1507.3.3(1). WHERE OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLIES ARE SEPARATED FROM EXHAUST POINTS BY DOORS PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO ENSURE AIR FLOW BY INSTALLATION OF DISTRIBUTION DUCTS, UNDERCUTTING DOORS, INSTALLATION OF GRILLES, TRANSOMS, OR SIMILAR MEANS. DOORS SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO A MINIMUM OF 1/2 INCH U�ERWIg6T�O�AIf�IWi�T 9fl tLEPVERING. 1. HAVE CONTROLLABLE AND SECURE OPENINGS; 2. BE SLEEVED OR OTHERWISE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO COMPROMISE THE THERMAL PROPERTIES OF THE WALL OR WINDOW IN WHICH THEY ARE PLACED; 3. ANY INLET OR COMBINATION OF INLETS WHICH PROVIDE 10 CFM AT 10 PASCALS ARE DEEMED EQUIVALENT TO 4 SQUARE INCHES NET FREE AREA. VENTILATION OPENING SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OPENINGS SHALL BE CONTROLLABLE, SECURABLE AND SHALL BE DESIGNED TO NOT COMPROMISE THE THERMAL PROPERTIES OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC CRAWL SPACES OR GARAGES. 7. ASPHALT ROOFS UNLESS IT IS SHOWN THAT NO OTHER LOCATION IS PERMISSIBLE. IN SUCH CASES THE INLET OPENING SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM T S AffIll OfNT ATED WHOLE NOUSE f ATIONR� FSINTAKE WHOLE -HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL PROVIDE OUTDOOR AIR AT THE RATE CALCULATED USING SECTION M1507.3.3. INTEGRATED FORCED -AIR VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL DISTRIBUTE OUTDOOR AIR TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE THROUGH THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM DUCTS. INTEGRATED FORCED -AIR VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTING A TERMINAL ELEMENT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING TO THE RETURN AIR PLENUM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM, AT A POINT WITHIN 4 FEET UPSTREAM OF THE AIR HANDLER. THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTION TO THE RETURN AIR STREAM SHALL BE LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM BLOWER AND SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY INTO A FURNACE CABINET TO PREVENT THERMAL SHOCK TO THE HEAT EXCHANGER. THE SYSTEM WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A MOTORIZED DAMPER CONNECTED TO THE AUTOMATIC VENTTTILATION CONTROL AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION V4JLANL� �'�l"M LAP �P�LIW&tfdEIf�P J@%CNf eD M1507.3.5.3 OUTDOOR AIR INLETS. INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. METHOD #3, M1507.3.6, WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING A SUPPLY FAN. SUPPLY FAN VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL DISTRIBUTE OUTDOOR AIR TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE THROUGH THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM DUCTS OR THROUGH DEDICATED DUCTS TO EACH HABITABLE SPACE. SUPPLY FANS SHALL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OUTDOOR AIR SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) AT 0.40 INCHES WATER GAUGE AS PER HVI 916. THE OUTDOOR AIR MUST BE FILTERED BEFORE IT IS DELIVERED TO HABITABLE SPACES. THE FILTER MAY BE LOCATED AT THE INTAKE DEVICE, IN LINE WITH THE FAN, OR, IN THE CASE OF A CONNECTION TO THE RETURN PLENUM OF THE AIR HANDLER, USING THE FURNACE FILTER. AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EITHER THE SUPPLY OR RETURN AIR STREAM. WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION PER IRC 1507 (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT) CONTINUED M1507.3.6.2 DUCTS. AN OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT CONNECTION TO THE SUPPLY AIR STREAM SHALL BE LOCATED DOWNSTREAM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM BLOWER. IF CONNECTED TO THE RETURN AIR STREAM IT SHAL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 4 FEET UPSTREAM OF THE FORCED -AIR SYSTEM BLOWER AND ITS FILTER. NEITHER SHALL BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY INTO A FURNACE CABINET. THE DUCT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1507.3.6.2. THE TERMINAL ELEMENT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING SHAL BE SIZE9BZEIN .Ol6.2LARGER THAN THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET DUCT. PRESCRIPTIVE SUPPLY FAN DUCT SIZING SUPPLY FAN TESTED CFM AT 0.40" WG SPECIFIED VOLUME FROM TABLE M1507.3.3(1) MINIMUM SMOOTH DUCT DIAMETER MINIMUM FLEXIBLE DUCT DIAMETER 50-90cfm 41NCH 5INCH 90-150cfm 51NCH 6INCH 150-120cfm 6INCH 7INCH 250-400cfm 71NCH 8INCH M1507.3.6.3 DAMPERS. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BACK -DRAFT DAMPER AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. A CALIBRATED MANUAL VOLUME DAMPER INSTALED AND SET TO MEET THE MEASURED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) BY FIELD TESTING WITH A PRESSURE GAUGE AND/OR FOLLOWING MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS; OR 2. A MANUAL VOLUME DAMPER INSTALLED AND SET TO MEET THE MEASURED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) BY FIELD TESTING WITH A FLOW HOOD OR A FLOW MEASURING STATION; OR 3. AN AUTOMATIC FLOW -REGULATING DEVICE SIZED TO THE SPECIFIED FLOW RATES IN TABLE M1507.3.3(1) WHICH PROVIDES CONSTANT FLOW OVER A PRESSURE RANGE OF AfA_ft0�WL�'��M.�td*W C��N§§LATION. ALL SUPPLY DUCTS IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-4. M1507.3.6.5 OUTDOOR AIR INLETS. INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. METHOD #4, M1507.3.7, WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING A HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM. ALL DUC WORK IN THIS SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED AND INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. MINIMUM FLOW RATING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THAT SPECIFIED IN TABLE M1507.3.3 1 . THE SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A FILTER ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE HEAT EXCHANGER IN BOTH THE INTAKE AND EXHAUST AIRSTREAMS WITH A MIN. EFFICIENCY RATING VALUE (MERV) OF 6. ALL SUPPLY DUCTS IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE HEAT EXCHANGER SHAL W51.U.�]E®UTI@ObfyINpgNLFi�• INLETS SHALL BE SCREENED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM ENTRY BY LEAVES OR OTHER MATERIAL. OUTDOOR AIR INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO TAKE AIR FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM AN APPLIANCE VENT OUTLET, UNLESS SUCH VENT OUTLET IS 3 FEET ABOVE THE OUTDOOR AIR INLET. 2. WHERE IT WILL PICK UP OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, FUMES OR FLAMMABLE VAPORS. 3. A HAZARDOUS OR UNSANITARY LOCATION. 4. A ROOM OR SPACE HAVING ANY FUEL -BURNING APPLIANCES THEREIN. 5. CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM A VENT OPENING OF A PLUMBING DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNLESS THE VENT OPENING IS AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE AIR INLET. 6. ATTIC, CRAWL SPACES, OR GARAGES. M1507.4 LOCAL EXHAUST. LOCAL EXHAUST SHAL BE PROVIDED IN EACH KITCHEN, BATHROOM, WATER CLOSET, LAUNDRY ROOM, INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, SPA, AND OTHER ROOMS WHERE WATER VAPOR OR COOKING ODOR IS PRODUCED. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHAL BE DESIGNED TO HAVE THE CAPACITY TO EXHAUST THE MINIMUM AIR FLOW RATE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE M1507.4. TABLE IRC M1507.4 MINIMUM REQUIRED EXHAUST RATES FOR ONF Ft TWO FAMII Y DWFI I INGS AREA TO BE EXHAUSTED EXHAUST RATES KITCHENS 100 CFM INTERMITTENT OR 25 CFM CONTINUOUS BATHROOMS - TOILET ROOMS MECHANICAL EXHAUST LAUNDRY ROOMS CAPACITY OF INDOOR SWIMMING POOLS 50 CFM INTERMITTENT OR & SPAS 20 CFM CONTINUOUS FOR SI:1 CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE = 0.0004719M'/s M1507.4.1 LOCAL EXHAUST FANS. EXHAUST FANS PROVIDING LOCAL EXHAUST SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM FAN FLOW RATING NOT LESS THAN 50 CFM AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE FOR BATHROOMS, LAUNDRIES, OR SIMILAR ROOMS AND 100 CFM AT 0.25 INCHES WATER GAUGE FOR KITCHENS. MANUFACTURERS' FAN FLOW RATINGS SHALL BE DETERMINED AS PER HVI 916 (APRIL 1995) OR AMCA 210. EXCEPTION: WHERE A RANGE HOOD OR DOWN DRAFT EXHAUST FAN IS USED TO SATISFY THE LOCAL EXHAUST REQUIREMENTS FOR KITCHENS, THE RANGE HOOD OR DOWN DRAFT EXHAUST SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 100 CFM AT 0.10 INCHES WATER WR.4.2 LOCAL EXHAUST CONTROLS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY MANUAL SWITCHES, DEHUMIDISTATS, TIMERS, OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. LOCAL EXHAUST SYSTEM CONTROLS SHAL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. IRC CHAPTER 16: DUCT SYSTEMS (WASHINGTON AMENDMENT) IRC M1601.1 DUCT DESIGN. DUCT SYSTEMS SERVING HEATING, COOLING AND VENTILATION EQUIPMENT SHAL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND ACCA MANUAL D OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. M1601.1.1 ABOVE -GROUND DUCT SYSTEMS. ABOVE -GROUND DUCT SYSTEMS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. EQUIPMENT CONNECTED TO DUCT SYSTEMS SHAL BE DESIGNED TO LIMIT DISCHARGE AIR TEMPERATURE TO A MAXIMUM OF 250-F (121'C). 2. FACTORY -MADE DUCTS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 181 AND INSTALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. 3. FIBROUS DUCT CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE SMACNA FIBROUS GLASS DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OR NAIMA FIBROUS GLASS DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 4. FIELD -FABRICATED AND SHOP -FABRICATED METAL AND FLEXIBLE DUCT CONSTRUCTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SMACNA HVAC DUCT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS -METAL AND FLEXIBLE, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY TABLE M1601.1.1. GALVANIZED STEEL SHAL CONFORM TO ASTM A 653. 5. USE OF GYPSUM PRODUCTS TO CONSTRUCT RETURN AIR DUCTS OR PLENUMS IS PERMITTED, PROVIDED THAT THE AIR TEMPERATURE DOES NOT EXCEED 125-F (52'C) AND EXPOSED SURFACES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO CONDENSATION. 6. DUCT SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS HAVING A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT GREATER THAN 200. 7. STUD WALL CAVITIES AND THE SPACES BETWEEN SOLID FLOOR JOISTS SHALL NOT BE USED AS A DUCT OR AN AIR PLENUM IN NEW CONSTRUCTION. FOR EXISTING SYSTEMS, STUD WALL CAVITIES AND THE SPACES BETWEEN SOLID FLOOR JOISTS TO BE USED AS AIR PLENUMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 7.1. THESE CAVITIES OR SPACES SHAL NOT BE USED AS A PLENUM FOR SUPPLY AIR. 7.2. THESE CAVITIES OR SPACES SHALL NOT BE PART OF A REQUIRED FIRE -RESISTANCE -RATED ASSEMBLY. 7.3. STUD WALL CAVITIES SHALL NOT CONVEY AIR FROM MORE THAN ONE FLOOR LEVEL. 7.4. STUD WALL CAVITIES AND JOIST -SPACE PLENUMS SHALL BE ISOLATED FROM ADJACENT CONCEALED SPACES BY TIGHT -FITTING FIRE BLOCKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R602.8. 7.5. STUD WALL CAVITIES IN THE OUTSIDE WALLS OF BUILDING ENVELOPE ASSEMBLIES SHAL NOT BE UTILIZED AS AIR PLENUMS. SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES: SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES (INCLUDING WOOD STOVES, ROOM HEATERS, FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES, FIREPLACE INSERTS, AND MASONRY HEATERS) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF IMC CHAPTERS 3 AND 9 AND IRC CHAPTER 10. SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES SHAL BE PROVIDED WITH TIGHT FITTING METAL OR CERAMIC GLASS DOORS AND ONE OF THE FOLOWING: 1. A SOURCE FROM OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURE OF PRIMARY COMBUSTION AIR, CONNECTED TO THE APPLIANCE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. THE AIR INLET SHALL ORIGINATE AT A POINT BELOW THE FIRE BOX. THE DUCT SHALL BE 4 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER, NOT EXCEED 20 FEET IN LENGTH, AND BE LNSTALLVVP FAffX M6Lff �AC0I1t %TRR NDED COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY, AS AN INSTALED UNIT, SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY TO HAVE PASSED TEST NO. 11-NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST, SECTION 12.3, OF ULC S627-M1984 "SPACE HEATERS FOR USE WITH SOLID FUELS." FIREPLACES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH READILY ACCESSIBLE MANUAL OR APPROVED AUTOMATIC TIGHT FITTING FLUE DAMPERS, EXCEPT FIREPLACES WITH GAS LOGS MUST COMPLY WITH IMC 901 OR LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER NFPA 58 AND 54. A 6 SQ. IN. OUTSIDE SOURCE FOR COMBUSTION AIR SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN OUTSIDE AIR DUCT DAMPER (EXCEPTION: WA CERTIFIED FIREPLACES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE COMBUSTION AIR SYSTEM NECESSARY FOR THEIR SAFE AND EFFICIENT COMBUSTION AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER). SITE BUILT FIREPLACES SHALL HAVE TIGHT FITTING GLASS OR METAL DOORS, OR A FLUE DRAFT INDUCTION FAN OR AS APPROVED FOR MINIMIZING BACK -DRAFTING. FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES SHALL USE DOORS LISTED FOR THE INSTALLED APPLIANCE. 2015 WASHINGTON STATE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE POST CERTIFICATE WITHIN 3' OF ELECTRICAL PANEL: R401.3 CERTIFICATE (MANDATORY). A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDER OR REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND POSTED ON A WALL IN THE SPACE WHERE THE FURNACE IS LOCATED, A UTILITY ROOM, OR AN APPROVED LOCATION INSIDE THE BUILDING. WHEN LOCATED ON AN ELECTRICAL PANEL, THE CERTIFICATE SHAL NOT COVER OR OBSTRUCT THE VISIBILITY OF THE CIRCUIT DIRECTORY LABEL SERVICE DISCONNECT LABEL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LABELS. THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE PREDOMINANT R-VALUES OF INSULATION INSTALLED IN OR ON CEILING/ROOF, WALLS, FOUNDATION (SLAB, BELOW -GRADE WALL, AND/OR FLOOR) AND DUCTS OUTSIDE CONDITIONED SPACES; U-FACTORS FOR FENESTRATION AND THE SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT (SHGC) OF FENESTRATION, AND THE RESULTS FROM ANY REQUIRED DUCT SYSTEM AND BUILDING ENVELOPE AIR LEAKAGE TESTING DONE ON THE BUILDING. WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE VALUE FOR EACH COMPONENT, THE CERTIFICATE SHAL LIST THE VALUE COVERING THE LARGEST AREA. THE CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE TYPES AND EFFICIENCIES OF HEATING COOLING AND SERVICE WATER HEATING E UIPMENT. WHERE A Q GAS -FIRED UNVENTED ROOM HEATER, ELECTRIC FURNACE, OR BASEBOARD ELECTRIC HEATER IS INSTALLED IN THE RESIDENCE, THE CERTIFICATE SHAL LIST "GAS -FIRED UNVENTED ROOM HEATER," "ELECTRIC FURNACE" OR "BASEBOARD ELECTRIC HEATER," AS APPROPRIATE. AN EFFICIENCY SHALL NOT BE LISTED FOR GAS -FIRED Uk\5!GirknCl�dltfiDllU U, ELECTRIC FURNACES OR ELECTRIC BASEBOARD HEATERS R302.1 INTERIOR DESIGN CONDITIONS. THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES USED FOR HEATING AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 72-F (22'C) FOR HEATING AND MINIMUM OF 75-F (24'C) FOR COOLING. R302.2TT EppXTFIE�RIIyOLR DDEESSIINGN CONDITIONS. THE HEATING OR COOLING OUTDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURES SHAL BE tIUbT G IHtfgMALD&V ELOPE REQUIREMENTS: INSULATION: UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INSULATION TO BE PER WSEC TABLE R402.1.1, CLIMATE ZONES 5 AND MARINE 4, AND THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS R402.2.1 THROUGH R402.2.11. FENESTRATION: R402.3 FENESTRATION (PRESCRIPTIVE). IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R402, FENESTRATION SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS R402.3.1 THROUGH R402.3.5. AIR LEAKAGE: R402.4 AIR LEAKAGE (MANDATORY . THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO LIMIT AIR LEAKAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH E REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS R402.4.1 THROUGH R402.4.4. R402.4.1 BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHAL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS R402.4.1.1 AND R402.4.1.2. THE SEALING METHODS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS SHAL ALLOW FOR DIFFERENTIAL EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION. R402.4.1.1 INSTALLATION. THE COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE AS LISTED IN TABLE R402.4.1.1 SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CRITERIA LISTED IN TABLE R402.4.1.1, AS APPLICABLE TO THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL, AN APPROVED THIRD PARTY SHALL INSPECT AL COMPONENTS AND VERIFY COMPLIANCE. R402.4.1.2 TESTING. THE BUILDING OR DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE TESTED AND VERIFIED AS HAVING AN AIR LEAKAGE RATE OF NOT EXCEEDING 5 AIR CHANGES PER HOUR. TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH A BLOWER DOOR AT A PRESSURE OF 0.2 INCHES W.G. (50 PASCALS). WHERE REQUIRED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL, TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY AN APPROVED THIRD PARTY. A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE RESULTS OF THE TEST SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY CONDUCTING THE TEST AND PROVIDED TO THE CODE OFFICIAL. TESTING SHAL BE PERFORMED AT ANY TIME AFTER CREATION OF(( AL PENETRATIONS O))F THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. ONCE MANUFACNTUREp .Y HgMALLOBUSINESDSSSHALLGBES PERMITTEDRTO E1 SEALOED OFF ATMTH E FRAMEDPRIIOR TO THE TEST. DURING TESTING: 1. EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND DOORS, FIREPLACE AND STOVE DOORS SHALL BE CLOSED, BUT NOT SEALED, BEYOND THE INTENDED WEATHERSTRIPPING OR OTHER INFILTRATION CONTROL MEASURES; 2. DAMPERS INCLUDING EXHAUST, INTAKE, MAKEUP AIR, BACKDRAFT AND FLUE DAMPERS SHAL BE CLOSED, BUT NOT SEALED BEYOND INTENDED INFILTRATION CONTROL MEASURES; 3. INTERIOR DOORS, IF INSTALED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, SHALL BE OPEN, ACCESS HATCHES TO CONDITIONED CRAWL SPACES AND CONDITIONED ATTICS SHALL BE OPEN; 4. EXTERIOR OPENINGS FOR CONTINUOUS VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATORS SHAL BE CLOSED AND SEALED; 5. HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS, IF INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, SHALL BE TURNED OFF; ANN�Dy R�� � g C,�g B� �F �Ng ��ER�q E E �yF T gy W110NSA)AIIDITIONS�ESTFIAN 5OOT�QUARE �E OCO�DITIDINELOORA��E�E FULLY ITIONS TESTED WITH THE EXISTING HOME HAVING A COMBINED MAXIMUM LEAKAGE RATE OF 7 AIR CHANGES/HR. TO QUALIFY FOR THIS EXCEPTION, THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING HOUSE MUST BE PRIOR TO THE 2009 WSEC. SYSTEMS: R403.1 CONTROLS (MANDATORY). AT LEAST ONE THERMOSTAT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH SEPARATE HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM. R403.1.1 PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT. WHERE THE PRIMARY HEATING SYSTEM IS A FORCED -AIR FURNACE, AT LEAST ONE THERMOSTAT PER DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING THE HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM ON A DAILY SCHEDULE TO MAINTAIN DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE SET POINTS AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE DAY. THE T/HERMOSTAT) SHALL ALLOW FOR, AT A MINIMUM, A 5-2 PROGRAMMABLE SCHEDULE M. THISSTH RMOSTDAT SHALLL INCLUDELTHEFCAPABIDLITY TO SET BA K ORRTEMPOR RIILY OPERATE THEIODSTEMRTO DDMAINTAIN ZTOHNE TEMPERATURES DOWN TO 557E (13'C) OR UP TO 85-F (29'C). THE THERMOSTAT SHALL INITIALLY BE PROGRAMMED WITH A HEATING TEMPERATURE SET POINT NO HIGHER THAN 70-F (21'C) AND A COOLING TEMPERATURE SET POINT NO LOWER THAN 787E (26'C). THE THERMOSTAT AND/OR CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE AN At4&� }�SDEADBAND OF NOT LESS THAN 10'F. 1. SYSTEMS CONTROLLED BY AN OCCUPANT SENSOR THAT IS CAPABLE OF SHUTTING THE SYSTEM OFF WHEN NO OCCUPANT IS SENSED FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO 30 MINUTES. 2. SYSTEMS CONTROLED SOLELY BY A MANUALY OPERATED TIMER CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE SYSTEM FOR NO MORE THAN TWO HOURS. R403.1.2 HEAT PUMP SUPPLEMENTARY HEAT (MANDATORY). UNITARY AIR COOLED HEAT PUMPS SHALL INCLUDE CONTROLS THAT MINIMIZE SUPPLEMENTAL HEAT USAGE DURING START-UP, SET-UP, AND DEFROST CONDITIONS. THESE CONTROLS SHALL ANTICIPATE NEED FOR HEAT AND USE COMPRESSION HEATING AS THE FIRST STAGE OF HEAT. CONTROLS SHALL INDICATE WHEN SUPPLEMENTAL HEATING IS BEING USED THROUGH VISUAL MEANS (E.G., LED INDICATORS). HEAT PUMPS EQUIPPED WITH SUPPLEMENTARY HEATERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CONTROLS THAT PREVENT SUPPLEMENTAL HEATER OPERATION ABOVE 40'F. AT FINAL INSPECTION THE AUXILIARY HEAT LOCK RY63�b?t%. IfSBAN�TAI�OHAWBLPPSL§A�-L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS R403.3.1 THROUGH R4 .�.l INSULATION (PRESCRIPTIVE). DUCTS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-8. DUCTS WITHIN A CONCRETE SLAB OR IN THE GROUND SHAL BE INSULATED TO R-10 WITH INSULATION DESIGNED TO BE USED BELOW GRADE. EXCEPTION: DUCTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF LOCATED COMPLETELY INSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. DUCTS LOCATED IN CRAWL SPACES DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THIS EXCEPTION R403.3.2 SEALING (MANDATORY). DUCTS, AIR HANDLERS, AND FILTER BOXES SHALL BE SEALED. JOINTS AND SEAMS SHAL COMPLY WITH EITHER THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE OR INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, AS E: 1. AIR -IMPERMEABLE SPRAY FOAM PRODUCTS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL JOINT SEALS. 2. FOR DUCTS HAVING A STATIC PRESSURE CLASSIFICATION OF LESS THAN 2 INCHES OF WATER COLUMN (500 PA), ADDITIONAL CLOSURE SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR CONTINUOUSLY WELDED JOINTS AND SEAMS, AND LOCKING -TYPE JOINTS AND SEAMS OF OTHER THAN SNAP -LOCK AND BUTTON -LOCK TYPES. I'/1)'.3 ? 1 ,%_r� AP HANDLFF AIR HANDLERS SHALL HAVE A MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION FOR AN AIR LEAKAGE OF NO MORE TITAN 2 PERCENT OF THE DESIGN AIR FLOW RATE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 193. R403.3.3 DUCT TESTING MANDATORY). DUCTS SHALL BE LEAK TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSU RS-33, USING THE MAXIMUM DUCT LEAKAGE RATES SPECIFIED. EXCEPTION: THE TOTAL LEAKAGE TEST OR LEAKAGE TO THE OUTDOORS IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DUCTS AND AIR HANDLERS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. FOR FORCED AIR DUCTS, A MAXIMUM OF 10 LINEAR FEET OF RETURN DUCTS AND 5 LINEAR FEET OF SUPPLY DUCTS MAY BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE. ALL METALLIC DUCTS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE MUST HAVE BOTH TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SEALED WITH MASTIC. IF FLEX DUCTS ARE USED, THEY CANNOT CONTAIN SPLICES. FLEX DUCT CONNECTIONS MUST BE MADE WITH NYLON STRAPS AND INSTALLED USING A PLASTIC STRAPPING TENSIONING TOOL. DUCTS LOCATED IN CRAWL SPACES DO NOT pQUppALIFEEY FOR THIIES EXXCEPTIIOEEN. A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE RESULTS SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY CONDUCTING THE TEST AND R40��3.4.T�UCT LEAKAGEIC�MANDATORY). THE TOTAL LEAKAGE OF THE DUCTS, WHERE MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R403.3.3, SHAL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ROUGH -IN TEST: TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 4 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WHEN TESTED AT A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.1 INCHES W.G. (25 PA) ACROSS THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE MANUFACTURER'S AIR HANDLER ENCLOSURE. AL REGISTERS SHALL BE TAPED OR OTHERWISE SEALED DURING THE TEST. IF THE AIR HANDLER IS NOT INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 3 CFM (85 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA.2. POSTCONSTRUCTION TEST: LEAKAGE TO OUTDOORS SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL T04 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA OR TOTAL LEAKAGE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 4 CFM (113.3 L/MIN) PER 100 SQUARE FEET (9.29 M2) OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WHEN TESTED AT A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.1 INCHES W.G. (25 PA) ACROSS THE ENTIRE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE I' *&>J86. WE�fI$GA&*1AL®LPAN 1 F.B14WDIRCGFKbiiC(tTtWiX8L�RkLT��Ue€�ERV%UML6R 9LhISTHFISTATION OF DUCTS IN EX ERIOR WALLS, FLOORS OR CEILINGS SHAL NOT DISPLACE REQUIRED M%LVWE 6WttYSTEM PIPING INSULATION (MANDATORY). MECHANICAL SYSTEM PIPING CAPABLE OF CARRYING FLUIDS ABOVE 105'F 41'C OR BELOW 55-F (13'C) SHAL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM OF R-6. EXCEPTION: UP TO 200 FEET 0 H RONIC SYSTEM PIPING INSTALED WITHIN THE CONDITIONED SPACE MAY BE INSULATED WITH A MINIMUM OF �%-INCH INSULATION WITH A K VALUE OF 0.28. R403.4.1 PROTECTION OF PIPING INSULATION. PIPING INSULATION EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHAL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE INCLUDING THAT CAUSED BY SUNLIGHT MOISTURE E UIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND WIND AND Q SHALL PROVIDE SHIELDING FROM SOLAR RADIATION THAT CAN CAUSE DEGRADATION OF THE MATERIAL. ADHESIVE A5§.§ 0PTHk R9STEMS. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR SERVICE HOT WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS R403.5.1 THROUGH R403.5.5. R403.5.1 HEATED WATER CIRCULATION AND TEMPERATURE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (MANDATORY). HEATED WATER CIRCULATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R403.5.1.1. HEAT TRACE TEMPERATURE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R403.5.1.2. AUTOMATIC CONTROLS, TEMPERATURE SENSORS AND PUMPS SHAL BE ACCESSIBLE. MANUAL CONTROLS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. R403.5.1.1 CIRCULATION SYSTEMS. HEATED WATER CIRCULATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A CIRCULATION PUMP. THE SYSTEM RETURN PIPE SHAL BE A DEDICATED RETURN PIPE OR A COLD WATER SUPPLY PIPE. GRAVITY AND THERMO-SYPHON CIRCULATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROHIBITED. CONTROLS FOR CIRCULATING HOT WATER SYSTEM PUMPS SHAL START THE PUMP BASED ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF A DEMAND FOR HOT WATER WITHIN THE OCCUPANCY. THE CONTROLS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY TURN OFF THE PUMP WHEN THE WATER IN THE CIRCULATION LOOP IS AT THE DESIRED TEMPERATURE AND WHEN THERE IS NO DEMAND FOR HOT WATER. R403.5.1.2 HEAT TRACE SYSTEMS. ELECTRIC HEAT TRACE SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH IEEE 515.1 OR UL 515. CONTROLS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY ADJUST THE ENERGY INPUT TO THE HEAT TRACING TO MAINTAIN THE DESIRED WATER TEMPERATURE IN THE PIPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIMES WHEN HEATED �f W§ bb f RQM1ARW'tYSTEMS. A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM HAVING ONE OR MORE RECIRCULATION PUMPS THAT PUMP WATER FROM A HEATED WATER SUPPLY PIPE BACK TO THE HEATED WATER SOURCE THROUGH A COLD WATER SUPPLY PIPE SHAL BE A DEMAND RECIRCULATION WATER SYSTEM. PUMPS SHALL HAVE CONTROLS THAT COMPLY WITH BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. THE CONTROL SHALL START THE PUMP UPON RECEIVING A SIGNAL FROM THE ACTION OF A USER OF A FIXTURE OR APPLIANCE, SENSING THE PRESENCE OF A USER OF A FIXTURE OR SENSING THE FLOW OF HOT OR TEMPERED WATER TO A FIXTURE FITTING OR APPLIANCE. 2. THE CONTROL SHALL LIMIT THE TEMPERATURE OF THE WATER ENTERING THE COLD WATER PIPING TO 104-F (40 1103.5.3 HOT WATER PIPE INSULATION (PRESCRIPTIVE). INSULATION FOR HOT WATER PIPE, BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE (R-VALUE) OF R-3. EXCEPTION: PIPE INSULATION IS PERMITTED TO BE DISCONTINUOUS WHERE IT PASSES THROUGH STUDS, JOISTS OR OTHER STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND WHERE THE INSULATED PIPES PASS OTHER PIPING, CONDUIT OR VENTS, PROVIDED THE INSULATION IS INSTALLED TIGHT TO EACH OBSTRUCTION. R403.5.4 DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS. DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHAL COMPLY WITH CSA 55.2. DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CSA 55.1. POTABLE WATER -SIDE PRESSURE LOSS OF DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHALL BE LESS THAN 3 PSI (20.7 kPa) FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS CONNECTED TO ONE OR TWO SHOWERS. POTABLE WATER -SIDE PRESSURE LOSS OF DRAIN WATER HEAT RECOVERY UNITS SHAL BE LESS THAN 2 PSI (13.8 kPa) FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS CONNECTED TO THREE OR MORE 04R -ELECTRIC WATER HEATER INSULATION. AL ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS IN UNHEATED SPACES OR ON gCOgNCRREETTE�FFLOORgS SHALL BE PLACED ON AN INCOMPRESSIBLE, INSULATED SURFACE WITH A MINIMUM THERMAL R 0 6 l�E>rH�FNEALOVENTILATION (MANDATORY). THE BUILDING SHAL BE PROVIDED WITH VENTILATION THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE OR INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, AS APPLICABLE, OR WITH OTHER APPROVED MEANS OF VENTILATION. OUTDOOR AIR INTAKES AND EXHAUSTS SHAL HAVE AUTOMATIC OR GRAVITY DAMPERS THAT CLOSE WHEN THE VENTILATION SYSTEM IS NOT OPERATING. R403.6.1 WHOLE -HOUSE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FAN EFFICACY. MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FANS SHALL MEET THE EFFICACY REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE R403.6.1. EXCEPTION: WHERE MECHANICAL VENTILATION FANS ARE INTEGRAL TO TESTED AND LISTED HVAC E UIPMENT Q THEY SHALL BE POWERED BY AN ELECTRONICALY COMMUTATED MOTOR. TABLE R403.6.1 MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEM FAN EFFICACY FAN LOCATION AIR FLOW RATE MINIMUM (CFM) MINIMUM EFFICACY (CFM/WATT) AIR FLOW RATE MAXIMUM (CFM) RANGE HOODS ANY 2.8 CFM WATT ANY IN -LINE FAN ANY 2.8 CFM WATT ANY BATHROOM, UTILITY ROOM 10 1.4 CFM WATT <90 BATHROOM, UTILITY ROOM 90 2.8 CFM WATT ANY TABLE R402.1.1 INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT° CLIMATE ZONE 5 AND MARINE 4 FENESTRATION U- ' 0.30 SKYLIGHT' U- 0.50 GLAZED FENESTRATION SHGC''e NR CEILING R-VALUE' 49 WOOD FRAME WALg.m.n R-VALUE 21 int MASS WALL R-VALUE' 21 21 FLOOR R-VALUE 309 BELOW -GRADE`"' WALL R-VALUE 10 15 21 int+TB SLAB' R-VALUE & DEPTH 10, 2 ft For SI: 1 foot=304.8mm, ci=continuous insulation, int= intermediate framing ° R-values are minimums. U-factors and SHGC are maximums. When insulation is installed in a cavity which is less than the label or design thickness of the insulation, the compressed R-value of the insulation from Appendix Table A101.4 shall not be less than the R-value specified in the 60� fenestration U-factor column excludes skylights. The SHGC column applies to all glazed fenestration. ° "10/15/21.+TB" means R-10 continuous insulation on the exterior of the wall, or R-15 continuous insulation on the interior of the wall, or R-21 cavity insulation plus a thermal break between the slab and the basement wall at the interior of the basement wall. "10/15/21.+TB" shall be permitted to be met with R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous insulation on the interior or exterior of the wall. "TB" M" t MTMi Se9ks6fdff6PrnisflPl�,'�u00 9f1Qep4r€�dtW$tsfWI*n grade floors. See R402.2.9.1. ° There are no SHGC requirements in the Marine Zone. f* Reserved. The second R-value applies when more than half the insulation is on the interior of the mass wall. I Reserved. k For single rafter- or joist -vaulted ceilings, the insulation may be reduced to R-38. Reserved. '" Int. (intermediate framing) demotes standard framing 16 inches on center with headers insulated with a minimum of R-10 insulation. o Log and solid timber walls with a minimum average thickness of 3.5 inches are exempt from this insulation requirement. ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS: R404.1 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (MANDATORY). A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF PERMANENTLY INSTALLED LAMPS IN LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE HIGH -EFFICACY LAMPS. R404.1.1 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (MANDATORY). FUEL GAS LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL NOT HAVE CONTINUOUSLY BURNING PILOT LIGHTS. HIGH EFFICACY LAMPS: COMPACT FLOURESCENT LAMPS, T-8 OR SMALER DIAMETER LINEAR FLOURESCENT LAMPS, OR LAMPS WITH A MINIMUM EFFICACY OF: 1. 60 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS OVER 40 WATTS; 2. 50 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS OVER 15 WATTS TO 40 WATTS; 3. 40 LUMENS PER WATT FOR LAMPS 15 WATTS TABLE R402.4.1.1 AIR BARRIER AND INSULATION INSTALLATION COMPONENT CRITERIA° AIR BARRIER AND THERMAL BARRIER A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. EXTERIOR THERMAL ENVELOPE CONTAINS A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER. BREAKS OR JOINTS IN THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE SEALED. AIR -PERMEABLE INSULATION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A SEALING MATERIAL. CAVITY INSULATION INSTALLATION ALL CAVITIES IN THE THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE FILLED WITH INSULATION. THE DENSITY OF THE INSULATION SHALL BE AT THE MANUFACTURERS' PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AND SAID DENSITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR ALL VOLUME OF EACH CAVITY. BATT TYPE INSULATION WILL SHOW NO VOIDS OR GAPS AND MAINTAIN AN EVEN DENSITY FOR THE ENTIRE CAVITY. BATT INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE RECOMMENDED CAVITY DEPTH. WHERE AN OBSTRUCTION IN THE CAVITY DUE TO SERVICES, BLOCKING, BRACING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION EXISTS, THE BATT PRODUCT WILL BE CUT TO FIT THE REMAINING DEPTH OF THE CAVITY. WHERE THE BATT IS CUT AROUND OBSTRUCTIONS, LOOSE FILL INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED TO FILL ANY SURFACE OR CONCEALED VOIDS, AND AT THE MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFIED DENSITY. WHERE FACED BATT IS USED, THE INSTALLATION TABS MUST BE STAPLED TO THE FACE OF THE STUD. THERE SHALL BE NO COMPRESSION TO THE BATT AT THE EDGES OF THE CAVITY DUE TO INSET STAPLING INSTALLATION TABS. INSULATION THAT UPON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO AVAILABLE SPACE SHALL BE INSTALLED FILLING CEILING/ATTIC THE AIR BARRIER IN ANY DROPPED CEILING/SOFFIT SHALL BE ALIGNED WITH THE INSULATION AND ANY GAPS IN THE AIR BARRIER SEALED. ACCESS OPENINGS, DROP DOWN STAIR OR KNEE WALL DOORS TO UNCONDITIONED ATTIC SPACES SHALL BE SEALED. BATT INSULATION INSTALLED IN ATTIC ROOF ASSEMBLIES MAY BE COMPRESSED AT EXTERIOR WALL LINES TO ALLOW FOR REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION. WALLS THE JUNCTION OF THE FOUNDATION AND SILL PLATE SHALL BE SEALED. THE JUNCTION OF THE TOP PLATE AND TOP OF EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SEALED. KNEE WALLS SHALL BE SEALED. CAVITIES WITHIN CORNERS AND HEADERS OF FRAME WALLS SHALL BE INSULATED BY COMPLETELY FILLING THE CAVITY WITH A MATERIAL HAVING A THERMAL RESISTANCE OF R-3 PER INCH MINIMUM. EXTERIOR THERMAL ENVELOPE INSULATION FOR FRAMED WALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONTACT AND CONTINUOUS ALIGNMENT WITH THE AIR BARRIER. WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS AND DOORS THE SPACE BETWEEN WINDOW DOOR JAMBS AND FRAMING AND SKYLIGHTS AND FRAMING SHALL BE SEALED. / RIM JOISTS RIM JOISTS SHALL BE INSULATED AND INCLUDE THE AIR BARRIER. FLOORS (INCLUDING ABOVE -GARAGE AND INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MAINTAIN PERMANENT CONTACT WITH UNDERSIDE OF SUBFLOOR DECKING. CANTILEVERED FLOORS) THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY EXPOSED EDGE OF INSULATION. CRAWL SPACE WALLS WHERE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF FLOOR INSULATION, INSULATION SHALL BE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE CRAWLSPACE WALLS. EXPOSED EARTH IN UNVENTED CRAWL SPACES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A CLASS I VAPOR RETARDER WITH OVERLAPPING JOINTS TAPED. SHAFTS, PENETRATIONS DUCT SHAFTS, UTILITY PENETRATIONS, AND FLUE SHAFTS OPENING TO EXTERIOR OR UNCONDITIONED SPACE NARROW CAVITIES BATTS IN NARROW CAVITIES SHALL BE CUT TO FIT AND INSTALLED TO THE CORRECT DENSITY WITHOUT ANY VOIDS OR GAPS OR COMPRESSION. NARROW CAVITIES SHALL BE FILLED BY INSULATION THAT ON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO THE AVAILABLE CAVITY SPACE. GARAGE SEPARATION AIR SEALING SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND CONDITIONED SPACES. RECESSED LIGHTING RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE AIR TIGHT, IC RATED, AND SEALED TO THE DRYWALL. PLUMBING AND WIRING BATT INSULATION SHALL BE CUT NEATLY TO FIT AROUND WRING AND PLUMBING IN EXTERIOR WALLS. THERE SHALL BE NO VOIDS OR GAPS OR COMPRESSION WHERE CUT TO FIT. INSULATION THAT ON INSTALLATION READILY CONFORMS TO AVAILABLE SPACE SHALL EXTEND BEHIND PIPING AND WIRING. SHOWER/TUB ON EXTERIOR WALL EXTERIOR WALLS ADJACENT TO SHOWERS AND TUBS SHALL BE INSULATED AND THE AIR BARRIER INSTALLED SEPARATING THEM FROM THE SHOWERS AND TUBS. ELECTRICAL/PHONE BOX ON EXTERIOR THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND ELECTRICAL OR COMMUNICATION BOXES OR AIR SEALED BOXES WALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED. HVAC REGISTER BOOTS HVAC REGISTER BOOTS THAT PENETRATE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE SHALL BE SEALED TO THE SUBFLOOR OR CONCEALED SPRINKLERS WHEN REQUIRED TO BE SEALED, CONCEALED FIRE SPRINKLERS SHALL ONLY BE SEALED IN A MANNER THAT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. CAULKING OR OTHER ADHESIVE SEALANTS SHALL NOT BE USED TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN FIRE SPRINKLER COVER PLATES AND WALLS OR CEILINGS. ° In addition, inspection of log walls shall be in accordance with the provisions of ICC-400. R403.7 EQUIPMENT SIZING AND EFFICIENCY RATING (MANDATORY). HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL S BASED ON BUILDING LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION METHODOLOGIES. THE OUTPUT CAPACITY OF HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN THAT OF THE SMALLEST AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT SIZE THAT EXCEEDS THE LOADS CALCULATED, INCLUDING ALLOWABLE OVERSIZING LIMITS. NEW OR REPLACEMENT HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE AN EFFICIENCY RATING EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM RE UIRED BY FEDERAL LAW FOR THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION WHERE THEE UIPMENT IS INSTALLED. Q Q R403.7.1 ELECTRIC RESISTANCE ZONE HEATED UNITS. ALL DETACHED ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MULTIPLE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS (TOWNHOUSES) UP TO THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLAN USING ELECTRIC ZONAL HEATING AS THE PRIMARY HEAT SOURCE SHALL INSTALL AN INVERTER -DRIVEN DUCTLESS MINI -SPLIT HEAT PUMP IN THE LARGEST ZONE IN THE DWELLING. BUILDING PERMIT DRAWINGS SHALL SPECIFY THE HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE AND LOCATION OF THE HEATING SYSTEM. EXCEPTION: TOTAL INSTALLED HEATING CAPACITY OF 2KW PER DWELLING OR LESS. R403.8 SYSTEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS (MANDATORY). SYSTEMS SERVING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS C403 AND C404 OF THE WSEC-COMMERCIAL PROVISIONS IN LIEU OF SECTION R403. R403.9 SNOW MELT SYSTEM CONTROLS (MANDATORY). SNOW AND ICE -MELTING SYSTEMS, SUPPLIED THROUGH ENERGY SERVICE TO THE BUILDING, SHALL INCLUDE AUTOMATIC CONTROLS CAPABLE OF SHUTTING OFF THE SYSTEM WHEN THE PAVEMENT TEMPERATURE IS ABOVE 50'F, AND NO PRECIPITATION IS FALLING AND AN AUTOMATIC OR MANUAL CONTROL THAT WILL ALLOW SHUTOFF WHEN THE OUTDOOR TEMPERATURE IS ABOVE 40'F. R406.1 SCOPE. THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL CRITERIA TO BE MET FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 101.2 OF THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CODE. R406.2 ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS (MANDATORY). EACH DWELLING UNIT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH SUFFICIENT OPTIONS FROM TABLE R406.2 SO AS TO ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM NUMBER OF CREDITS: 1. SMALL DWELLING UNIT :................... 1.5 CREDITS DWELLING UNITS LESS THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET IN CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA WITH LESS THAN 300 SQUARE FEET OF FENESTRATION AREA. ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING THAT ARE GREATER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET OF HEATED FLOOR AREA BUT LESS THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET 2. MEDIUM DWELLING UNIT: ........ 3.5 CREDITS ALL DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN #1 OR #3. EXCEPTION: DWELLING UNITS SERVING R-2 OCCUPANCIES SHALL REQUIRE 2.5 CREDITS. 3. LARGE DWELLING UNIT: ............ 4.5 CREDITS DWELLING UNITS EXCEEDING 5000 SQUARE FEET OF CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. EXCEPTION: DWELLING UNITS SERVING R-2 OCCUPANCIES SHALL REQUIRE 2.5 CREDITS 4. ADDITIONS LESS THAN 500 SQUARE FEET....0.5 CREQ DRAWINGS INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL IDENTIFY WHICH OPTIONS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AND THE POINT VALUE OF EACH OPTION, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SEPARATE MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, OR OTHER PERMITS ARE UTILIZED FOR THE PROJECT. NO o LU �n & Z M 0 W I Z � v Do Q J 0- (D ro o Z O Q rn J D0 D � CO F_ n �S w 9 W � w 0 o r) W W Z O 0 J o 0, 0- < .F g U 0 3 U - rn o r- a � � r- � r7 T m w 3 < Lo o W LiJ L1J Q�co z N00� �Mo N< I � � o 0o vi r` ��/ N Z V1 L� 0, O N N � 00 �w LL O � Mz w O >,- W b wz W(n Ln< ,_� X =� c� LJJ L� ac w a` Z J W I J n Q <w QL_ Z I O cS - ao z a C) O Q N W OJ DC) >- w on U 7/ OF Packet Pg. 282 Plant twice ba I I C% Prune diseased and broken branches 16 gauge steel wire through clear vinyl hose Tie low first crotch 2x2 wooden stakes securely driven into ground. Stain brown. Water basin with 2'' mulch Unglazed planting pit surface 1/2 topsoil, 1/2 native soil, water thoroughly, fertilize DECIDUOUS TREE PANTING DETAIL No Scale rune diseased and roken branches Planting be later basin with 2'' mulch " mulch ompacted topsoil at or -thoroughly, :rti I ize as roc[d lantin hole min. -4ioe sgize of root ball 1/2 spacing distance SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL No Sca l e NOTES I. Subgrodes, including berms, to within 1/I0th foot provided by Oenerol Contractor unless otherwise noted. 2. Subgrode shall be scarified or rototilled if conditions reopire. 5. 4" depth 5-way topsoil or eopol in all planting areas. 4 2'' depth fine grade bark mulch in all planting beds. 5. All plant material shall be healthy, full and conform to USA standard nursery stock, latest edition. 6. Plant material or size or kind not available may be substituted only with approval of Leondscope Architect or Owner. I. All mass plantings shall have triangular spacing. a. L ondscape Contractor shall maintain site until final inspection and acceptance by Owner. LANT LIST 50TANICAL / COMMON GROUND COVER SPACING DETAIL No Scale- Triangular spacing Fyrue calloryana/ <ateura Troo 2" calipor, 5�5 Ar-or Falmatum ' 5Iaodgaod ' / E31ood9aod jopanoeo maplo, 1=1/2" Calipor Knimum, 5�5 Finue Niera / Slack Finn. 5' minimum, 5�5 cluproeeocyparie loylandii ' Emaroild lelo ' / i=morald lele Loyland Cyproee, 7' minimum, 5$ 5 (ietu5 x Skonboreii / Skonboreii o'-'kroeo, 5 eollon Ohadodendron Uniopo 2-7" min. hododendron \/ulcan, 2-1" min. Fhadodondran We. Furnival, min. hododondron Mrs. Furnivol, min. 4 \/iburnum Dovidii 2 eollon Thuia O. ' Emerald Oroon ' / Emorald Oroen Ardorvitoo 5' min.5$ 5 Aza1oo Hina Crimeon, 2 gallon Lovondulo ' HidCOto ' / Hidcoto Lovondor, .2 eol1On O 5uxu5 'Green \Ielvet' / Green Velvet 5oxi load, I5" min epreod \/inc,o minor / poriwinklo 4" pots 24" 0.C,. Sodded ]sawn 0 z �11 X Ll T"rFE �Tr--, H �e I N �0" T"rFE EXI5TINO E31JILDINO DEC�< SEE CIVIL DFZINOS. 24"CE i C IT � 5 \�f,ED I GED \ I \i 1 0ED /I / / FIFE STREET Sly ( HX�lJF;,�"r �) LAXDT�AFE FLAX �(f,A1=E : I '' e 1 O' � O O z LU 0 � .o �9 — O ® � - U O lll� m 0 m 0 d 3 LO LO 0 o cf l o, (� II --II 0 J a � ff� �DII E K m �z 0 a c d s M a zo = o0� a o Zw o� z_ a Q=N Q ZV N00 U Lit aW N 3� w Z\ g �Q Z W L CO CO WU CO E1 z 0 � W � o W Q 03 03 E'1 n Q o .� J Sheet Packet Pg. 283 10' 0 10' 20' 30' Scale 1 " = 10' NE1/4, SW1/4, SEC. 31, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH SUNDE TCD LIGHTING FIXTURE HAMPTON BAY BLACK OUTDOOR INTEGRATED LED WALL LANTERN SCONCE QUANTITY = I I (ELEVEN) LOCATION = I (ONE) AT EACH ENTRY DOORWAY I (ONE) ON EACH SIDE OF EACH GARAGE DOOR SPECI FI CA TIONS HEIGHT DEPTH WIDTH COLOR MA TERIAL 8 INCHES 7 INCHES 5 INCHES BLACK METAL/TEXTURED GLASS 600 LUMEN LIGHT OUTPUT 3000K COLOR TEMPERATURE COLOR RENDERING INDEX 82 DOWNWARD LIGHTING SITE DATA SITE ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED LAND USE: LOT AREA: LOT SLOPE.• DRIVEWAY SLOPES: NUMBER OF UNITS: WATER DISTRICT.- SEWER DISTRICT.- SCHOOL DISTRICT.- FIRE DISTRICT.- 8629 258TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 004633 007 003 02 RM 1.5 TOWNHOUSE 10, 836 SF 10.8 PERCENT DOWNWARD NE TO SW NOTED ON PLAN 5 UNITS CITY OF EDMONDS OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER DISTRICT EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY 0 3 O CD 3 Lo O O CD O N Z J d N C O E t V R r� Q O O Co C d E L v R r r Q Packet Pg. 284 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 SUNDE TOWNHOMES 8629 238TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98020 OWNER CITADEL DEVELOPMENT 24225 85TH AVE SE WOO DINVILLE, WA 98072 425.770.0844 CONTACT: THOR SUNDE GENERAL NOTES CONSULTANTS ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER PUGET SOU NO PLANNING CG ENGINEERING 5005 200TH ST SW, SUITE 101-B 250 4TH AVE S, SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 EDMONDS, WA 98020 425.830.1046 425.778.8500 FAX 778.5536 CONTACT: HANNAH PHILBRICK CONTACT: JARED UNDERBRINK GEOTECHNICAL SURVEYOR ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES ASPI LAND SURVEYING & PLANNING 9115TH AVE 5205 S 2ND AVE, SUITE KIRKLAND, WA 98033 EVERETT, WA 98203 425.827.7701 425.252.1894 CONTACT: BRUCE BLYTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, HANHURY'S SOOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPTTHAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WAHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219685. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OD SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHING I UN PARCEL NUMBER 00463300700302 DATUM NAVD 88 GENERAL NOTES 24.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TOTHE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL 25. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. - CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) -2016 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION 26. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS - WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SHOWN. SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) 27. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5%SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. STANDARD DETAILS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. AS NECESSARYTO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR 4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND GOVERNING AUTHORITY. BRACING, AS REQUIRED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT" 29. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CITY PROCEDURES FOR ALL DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL ASBUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS, HYDRANT SHUTOFFS, STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS SUBMITTALTO THE OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. ASET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS RESTRICTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. OCCUPANCY/FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL. 30. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. I PITERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS 7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF CONFLICTS THAT ARISE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALLCONTACTTHE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. CON TRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. IL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. SUBGRADE SOILS IN ALL AREAS WHERE RAIN GARDENS, INFILTRATION OR PERVIOUS PAVEMENT IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE DELINEATED AND PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES FROM COMPACTIVE ACTIVITIES (I.E. HEAVY EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILING). 14. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 15. SEE SURVEYAND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. 16. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 17. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER. 18. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 19. ALL FOOTING DRAINS SERVING BUILDINGS, WALLS, ROCKERIES, ETC. SHALL CONNECT TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 21. A SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. PRIOR TO FINAL CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE, PROVIDE TO THE CITY WATER QUALITY TECHNICIAN, A COPY OF THE BACKFLOW TEST REPORT. TEST REPORTS CAN BE FAXED TO 425-744-6057 OR EMAILED TO 1EFF.KOBLYK@EDMONDSWA.GOV. BACKFLOW TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. 22. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. 23. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE COMPOST AMENDED AND SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ONSITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES. 31. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 32. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 33. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND CITY. 34. FIELD STAKE ALL UTILITY STUBS AT THE PROPERTY LINE. 35. TRENCH BACKFILL OF UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95%. COMPACTION TEST REPORTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO PAVING. 36. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. 37. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING. 38. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK. 39. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 40. PIPE MATERIAL AND SIGNAGE SUBMITTALS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1. SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT. 1326. TWO DAY (48 HR) NOTICE IS REQUIRED. 2. REVIEW TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLNOTES. 3. CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES. 4. INSTALL TESC MEASURES AND MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL WHILE PREVENTING DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS OF VEGETATIONOUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. 5. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES AND/OR DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. FROM OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL 30TH ANY EXPOSED SOILS NOT BEING WORKED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS SHALL BE COVERED. FROM MAY 1ST TO SEPTEMBER 30 ANY EXPOSED SOILS NOT BEING WORKED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS SHALL BE COVERED. 6. DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURES 7. ROUGH GRADE SITE AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL DRAINAGE FEATURES. 8. CLEAR, GRUB&ROUGH GRADE SITE. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. (OTHER EXPOSED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES BELOW) 9. INSTALL UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. STABILIZE AND COMPOST AMEND ALL EXPOSED SOILS PRIOR TO REVEGETATION OF ENTIRE SITE. 11. ESTABLISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL SITE STABILIZATION AND APPROVAL BY CITY INSPECTOR NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. (6, �� �J.": ® CAUTION! FCALL BEFORE YOU DIGL BURIED UTILITIES EXIST IN THE AREA AND UTILITY INFO R MATION SHOWN MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. CONTACT THE ONE-CALLUTILITY RSPR LOCATE ONSTRSERVICE AMINIMUM OF 45 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 1-800-424-5555 SHEET INDEX C1.1 COVER SHEET&GENERAL NOTES C2.1 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2.2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C3.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN & DETAILS C3.2 GRADING & DRAINAGE DETAILS C4.1 WATER &SEWER PLAN C4.2 WATER &SEWER DETAILS 11 C5.1 I TRAFFICCONTROL PLAN VICINITY MAP NT5 ENGINEERING L 25D 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 200 EOI4OHDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 r PROJECT51TE 1 ' LEGEND DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED ABN BLDG BOW rE CB CMP CO CONC CONST CP CU YD DDCVA DI DIA DIP EA E1 ELEV EDP EX FDC FEE FH FL FT GV HP HT ID IE L LCPE LF LP LT MAX MECH MH ABBREVIATIONS PROPERTY LINE - - - - ABANDONED MIN MJ MON NES OC PC PI PIV I'L PT PVC PVI PVMT PVT R REINF RI RET RT SD SECT SDMH SIM SQ SS SSMH STA STD STL TB TOC TOW TOP TYP VC Wf WM MINIMUM ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE BUILDING MECHANICAL101NT CENTERLINE BOTTOM OF WALL MONUMENT CLEARING LIMITS CENTERLINE NOT TO SCALE SILT FENCE X X - X X- CATCH BASIN ON CENTER CONTOUR LINE -----100----- 0 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE POINT OF CURVATURE FENCE CLEANOUT POINT OF INTERSECTION SANITARY SEWER LINE ---ss->--ss- ss ss- CONCRETE POST INDICATOR VALVE MANHOLE 0 ® CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LINE STORM DRAIN MAIN - - -SD- > - -SD- so sD- CONCRETE PIPE POINT OF TANGENCY STORM DRAIN PIPE CUBICYARD POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE ROOF DRAIN - - - R - - - a - - - R - a -a DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION FOOTING DRAIN - - - F - - - F - - - F --F-F- DUCTILE IRON PIPE PAVEMENT PRESSURE LINE - - - P - - - P - - - P - P-P DIAMETER POINT OF VERTICAL TANG. CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) ❑ ■ DURILE IRON PIPE RADIUS CATCH BASIN (TYPE 2) ® EACH REINFORCEMENT CLEANOUT EXPANSION JOINT RESTRAINED JOINT CLEANOUTAND WYE �ro �� ELEVATION RETAINING GRADE BREAK - - - - - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT RIGHT SURFACE SWALE EXISTING STORM DRAIN DRAINAGE ARROW FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION SECTION WATER LINE - - - WA- - - WA- -WA-W/ FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION STORM DRAIN MANHOLE WATER METER IF ® FIRE HYDRANT SIMILAR FIRE HYDRANT Cr FLANGE SQUARE FDC )IIr FEET/FOOT SANITARY SEWER PIV O • GATE VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GATE VALVE R Z HIGH POINT STATION TEE L HEIGHT STANDARD 90' BEND 1 J INSIDE DIAMETER STEEL THRUST BLOCKING • INVERT ELEVATION THRUST BLOCK CAP .. LENGTH/LINE TOP OF CURB CONCRETE PAVEMENT a° ° ° ° -b LINED CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE TOP OF WALL ASPHALT PAVEMENT LINEAL FOOT TOP ELEVATION CRUSHED SURFACING - - - LOW POINT TYPICAL ROCKERY LEFT IVFRTICALCURVE SPOT ELEVATION -20.0 ,-20.0 &WXIMyM IWITH TELEPHONE LINE - - - T - - - T - - - T--T-T- MK"NICAL MANHOLE WATER N4ETER POWER LINE ---E--- E - - -E- E-E GAS LINE --- G--- G - - -G- G-G SIGN RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE CITY STORMWATEFI CODE Preliminary Approval Only Apprared Gy,Zachary Rlanarason 0110BL o2T APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE BY'. CITY ENGINEEN O gNgON 12/ IA/ 20 DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 0 Z C) Q V / L.I..I N -0 1- � o a' w 0 = N Q Ld Z (n J O LAJ Z LLJ Lil Z N : > Z =) W in 0 LLJ V) 00 Ls 0 0 SHEET C1.1 q1 E 0 s c 3 0 CD C ''3^ v! 110 0 CD r CD Z J a rt+ CD ii Q ad L 0 Q yyCD ♦i v! CD t u a Packet Pg. 285 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C 6 1 EXISTING BUILDING X 12"CED DECK 8 cED 2-12"C D \� 0 S I INSTALL CLEARING LIMITS USING HIGH VISIBILITY PLASTIC OR METAL FENCE 24 CE � �� — - _ \ N89°45'00"E 90.00' 4 I4� �35' x x --- 2-12" ED Y `IlI. --------------x- EUNDER\ v' V \\� DEMO EXISTING HOUSE, X P P /� V / _ SHEDS, WALKWAYS, IF SLP AND DRIVEWAYS'51 � 6 \\ q EX. SFRCE J><(3 N F{ Z INSTALLFLTER96 \\} FABRIC FE CE71 nXO 1412 `` PROTECT EXISTING TREES 4"C D -415.2 l`o 1� w o DECK X _z Z_ - 1 I X ITl II O I2-12"C D� 18"CON �� 12"CON 11 O 18"CON I x I 7\ 18"CE ° r III, - O �\I II �_ __ REMOVE TREES 0 w°- II'4; 18n CED N .24"CON - x� 11 18"CED '� ° O � 18"COTN----- �� 18"CON X --- x ��1 , SHED '�,, 84"CED Tl i3112"CE 24'CON I USE EXIST FOR CIONSDTVEWAY RIUCTION ` X . ACCESS UNTIL REMOVAL IS REQ'D LD G. WALL T0408.7 ` �\ \ 40"CON` ��\ 24"DEC \ '. "C D , ' , PARCEL B T41 2.5 I \ X CITY OE'�DMONDS BOUNDARY LIME �4"CED x ADJUSTMENT N0. LL2006-129 YL ---I -___ --_ I AFN'2,00612275209 , t41SEVVE EASEMENT - X �1� YL 4 0 15 1 \ �� REMOVE FENCE \�� ` 'AF N 1�9 II I X — X �'� n X �X-X�x' C FbU N D R/C "LSR ---_ V(2) N82°39'19'W ---� _, — �1 Zo.11 90.80' ,9 ° a ° l • . e °e a d ° P a . a `a\ `` • - .� I e /4/ I ° e ° < • _ a .. alll ^- al. ° ° n • . ° 1'ryII a. \° a - ° a 4 • ., Sa • ° a° NOTES: =. RE BEGINNING LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING CLEARING AND GRADING, CLEARLY MARK ALL CLEARING LIMITS AND r . � -° - " - ° ° SENSITIVE AREAS AND THEIR BUFFERS. �. TYPE II CB W/ j CONTROL STRUCTURE / - - - / / - - /' SSMH - SD/SD O / - � / - / 2. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED SURFACESSHALL BE AMENDEDTO MEET DOE BMPT5.13. 3. SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OFTHE SHIFT BEFORE RIM 408.82' / - -j RIM 413.33 0 +.� HOLIDAY OR WEEKEND IFNEEDED BASED ON THE WEATHER IE N 36" CMP=404.02': / IE SW E E 112" CMP 4405:60'/ / - - r /. / j - / IE E 8 CONC=40548 �/ - / - INSTALL TEMPORARY IE W 8" CONC=40538' 0 Cj SEDIMENT TRAPS IN 2 j / _ _ - - / FORECAST. 4. CONCRETETRUCKS MUST NOT BE WASHED OUT ONTO THE GROUND, INTO STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES, STREETS, STREAMS. EXISTING CATCH BASINS'L2. / / WITHIN 100' OF SITE, TYPe/ - -/ / - / -. / - 2.6.0.00' _ EXCESS CONCRETE MUST NOT BE DUMPED ON -SITE. . EX 5. ADDITIONAL BMPS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. - - — - — — — T — N89'45'00"E 6119.19'-M \ 659.21''�r 238TH STREE II SW (H Au_� FL-- - -------- ------------------------------------ - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL LAN 1 SCALE 1" = 10'-0" RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: _ CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 12/ 14/ 20 w 0 DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 illium- \�J N O tn3::o w N 00 O rn W Q J =NQ 3:: a� 0 00 O ~ N O LI..1 Z C Z Z N :m = o wO (n 00 w F- 0 ; SHEET C2.1 m 0 s c L0 r d 3 O O CD O N Z J a d t ci r Q ad r_ O CL V! _ d t u m a Packet Pg. 286 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. 2' x 2' TITER FABRIC SECURED TO 2':Y 14 GA WIRE FABRIC EQUAL NOTES. I. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND ENSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL 1hROUGHOUT PROJECT. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON 2. SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED DOWNSLOPE OF OONSTRUC71ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS ACTIVITY. BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN REVISION DATE FILTER FABRIC FENCE JOIJARY 2018 CITY OF EDMONDS FILTRATION SYSTEMS PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD __- DEPARTMENT 5, DETAIL 1E90 APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH ER-900 CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL 1 ULE: NOT TO SCALE FlLTEH BOOK WITH J . (jyp) XOIEs ` GRATE OVERt LOOK OVER FLOW HOLES CATCH BASIN NOTES: CATCH BASIN 1. CONICR/EN EAOPAELLRShall MAINTAIN THSROLT TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2. ANY SEDIMENT IN CATCH BASIN INSERT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN INSERT IS ONE-THIRD FULL. 3. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN. REVISION DATE TEMPORARY JANUARY 2018 ` `.CITY OF EDMONDS SEDIMENT TRAP PUBLIC WORKS FOR CATCH BASINS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL fs,, jg9O APPROVED BY: R. ENGUSH ER-902 CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION C � ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 12,114120 r 0 DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 O cV W (V O = V) Q 00 F- IM 0 LLI N Z 0 OT O Z CV :2 =) tD p (n 00 W SHEET C2.2 0 0 CD 3 LC) Ln 0 O CD r O N Z J d to C CD u M �Q( W L 0 Q (D w R� R� IY v/ C d t v R r Q Packet Pg. 287 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C 6 ----------------__ �I\`\ EXISTING BUILDING 12"CED DECK 8"cE0 2-12"C \ SOP: 4225 TOP: 424.1 TOP: 424.1 TOP: 424.5 \ T< 421.8 TOE: 421.8 TOE: 421.8 TOE: 421.8 O \- I EG: 442.5 EG: 424.1 EG: 424.1 EG: 424.5 24'CE y� \ �� N89"45'00"E _ 0.00' 1 Q, 40 13�'--------- 2-12" 1 �� TT ROLLED CUR PER 420.80 - _N I N \ ^ COESPTR-521 - �� \ V.. Ire I \ 4" AREA DRAIN e FOOTING AND \ Y E UNDER PPS ROOF DRAINS �� RIM: 420.0 �\ IE OUT: 417.67 420.57 TYPE ICB Q�2 o51 W/LP 1I �/ RI.:419.8D G -V_IE IN (4" E):417.39 U 42 ROLLED CURS PER 'COE. DTR3j1 4"TRAFFIC -RATED\ 6 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE-TREfjCH DRAIN MOVED INTO PRIVATE RIM: 417.90 9 6 N RD PER EASEMENT IE OUT: 411,17 �/ AFN 200701050551, TYP 71 �\-OP: 417.0 1 r D 14 2 - .J _\\ T E:416.15. I _ I E_G: 416.5 4 'I 1 5.2 4"TRAIJFIC-RATEDC - \ TRENCH DRAIN IRIR - IM: 416.OL - IE O(UT: 413.67. 1 TOP:-4143S tOE: 414.75. -. IEG: 415.25 I= 88 LF"'8" DIP @ 18"CON �t _1_J. 10.0% Lam; I �\\)7 12"CON 4" TRFFIG.RAI'ED �\ TR NCH DRAIN 18"CON RIM 414.0 IEi OUT: 411.67. 4 413.75 .24"CON �4"TR�FRc-RATED 1 �� 'T ENCHDRAIN RIM: 413.75 \IE, T411:42 413.1 18"CON m IL` \ ��\ O 4' TRAFFIC -RATED, TRENCH DRAIN 1 24"CON RIM:412.75 \ --� IE OUT: 410A2 1 WALLTRAFFIC -RATED T0408 RIM: 411.7 1 TRENCH 411.IN L� \ � 75 IE OUT: 409.42 T `-r 2. 5 O j \\ TYPE I CB ~ RIM::412.0 %- IE IN (6 NJ: 408.80 YL // - - - - :OUT(6 E):408.70 14 iF^'a PVC@ . YL 4 OFbOTING DR IN \ ���JJJ 000TFALLL NE \\r \ �OF DETENTI N TIE DETENTION SYSTEM OUTFALL PIPE INTO N E TRY 421.25 COAT EXPOSED ROOF SURFACE GARAGE ENTRY WITH AN INERT, NON -LEACHABLE 420.25 ENAMEL COATING \ GARAGE ENTRY 419.25 \ 4" AREA DRAIN 6.0% TOP: 417.7� RI M: 417.1 n TOE: 4J17.5 \ / IE OUT: 415.17 / /�Y / , ail 25 417.3 ROCKERY �Rff -9ff = \\ 414.0 414.55 TOE: 414.0 _----- W113./97��Ir" fr,Z.13 EG: 417.0 ////✓ / �" V I //� -- E TRY 415.18 3' MAX HT ROCKERY TOP: 424.0 TOE: 421.8 EG: 424.0 t 4"CED I 1 24�'CED I 24"CED CL EXISTING STORM DRAIN ^ PER EASEMENT AFN - - IT 1r l� `070150551 - Atl`F.. SZ pJ IVI(2) 3ss3 RIM 410LD5*RPauRENg2"39'19 w ____ _ � IEIN(6"NW):408.63 3 90.80� m a� \e i �t O TYPE II CB W/ i - 133333 'p - O SID SD CONTROL STRUCTURE / - - // SSMH- O Co + IE E 8" CONC=405 48 IE W.8" NC=40538' O C 260.00',/ I' N89 45'00"E 61, 9.19' M 659.21 P 3i33i 238TH STREE \I SW (HANE UL Y� --- - -- --------- ---- ------ \ ----------------------- FL ,L --- GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SCALE SO 0 5 SO 20© /)\< 3.65J - a, I T - .a I � `--------- 60% \ GARAGE ENTRY 413.50 GARAGE ENTRY ` 413.50 \\4k2\50 3 414.83 -4.,p% 3 � 49LF^• ENTRY 411.18 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL 8" IN FROM WOOD. ALL AROUND, WRAPPED IN SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, SLOPE AT 0.5% MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS AS SHOW N 6" DOWNSPOUT TIGHTLINE TO FINISHED GRADE a CONVEYANCE SYSTEM @ 0.5% MIN. PLACE NEXTTO FOOTING DRAIN OR AS SHOWN ON = III GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (CONTRACTOR MAY LOCATE ON EITHER SIDE OF FOOTING DRAIN) " 00 o O O ° n OO OoO O O� OO ° LINE OF MAX EXCAVATION. IF SOIL IS OVEREXCAVATED, 000 O OOC o0 REPLACE WITH LEAN MIX 0 CONCRETE / ��� FOOTING FOOTING AND ROOF DRAIN SECTION 2 SCALE: NTS STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" BACKFILL, BEDDING FINISHED GRADE & HAUNCHING PER PER PLAN 1 MANUFACTURER Q EOP OF RISER - STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" ELEV = MATCH EXISTING GRADE 3.0'0 N-12 RISER DETENTION TANK TOP = 710.-0 `DMH STEPS @ 1.0' OC WELD OR BOLT TO DETENTION TANK �OUTLET IE=407.50 •' - ,,MIE�' iu" - DETENTION TANK Z IE=407.0 12"0 PVC FLOW 49LF^' 3.0'0 N-12 CONTROL ASSEMBLY b _ DETENTION TANK NOTES: RESTRICTOR PLATE 1. RESTRICTOR ORIFICES TO BE SHOP DRILLED, SHARP EDGED, W/ 29/32"0 ORIFICE n FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH DETENTION TANK -SECTION NOTES 1. SOILS REPORT REPORT NUMBER EE070610A PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DATED: JANUARY 8, 2008 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF -SITE SHALL BE COMPOST AMENDED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF BMP T5.13 IN ECOLOGY'S STORMWATER MANUAL VOLUME V, CHAPTER 5. 3. T SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE DRY UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.) AND SEWER, WATER, AND STORM AND 5' FROM ANY CITY MAIN LINES. 4. ATYPE II CATCH BASIN IS REQUIRED WHENEVER RIM TO INVERT EXCEEDS 5'. 5. PRIOR TO PLACING ANY SURFACING MATERIAL ON THE ROADWAY, IT WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DENSITY TEST REPORTS CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. 6. NEW/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (INCLUDING ROW): 7,818 SF -- ROOF (INCLUDES OVERHANGS): 5,243 SF -- WALKWAYS (NOT COVERED BY ROOF OVERHANGS): 360 SF -- DRIVEWAY(NOT COVERED BY ROOF OVERHANGS): 1,711 SF -- DRIVEWAY(ROW): 504 SF 7. DRIVEWAYSLOFES SHALL NOT EXCEED 14%. S. WORKED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2:1. RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GRADING QUANTITIES TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) - 480 CU YDS TOTAL EMBANKMENT(FILL)- 40 CU YDS TOTAL 520 CU YDS THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE. DO NOT USE FOR BIDDING, PAYMENT, OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES. PAVING LEGEND NEWASPHALT OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITVSAWCUT NEW CONCRETE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DAIS - BY: CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 12/14/20 N d O s LO CD Z m 3 ID w Co d � 0 w °C O o a � r w � � ry N N Z J Y a tt 4 > N DESIGN: TAF = DRAWN. JCP CHECK: JPU E JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 a ad r_ O CL 1.6 v! Ld Z v Of J r �o V LI.1 fn 2 O Z = N Q Q 3 o M Q Z Q La1 N Z Z Z 04 Q:� Q t=nCwoo�w 0IL � SHEET C3.1 Packet Pg. 288 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C 6 UNDISTURBED PLANTS UNOISTURBEO TUR= (LAWN) (SEE VOTE 1) AREAS (SEE NOTE 1) 'i 11 UNDISTURBED NA-IVE VEGETATION 0' UNDISTURBED TURF]LAWN/LANDSCAPE UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OPTION 1 - NO DISTURBANCE PLANTING BEDSTJRF (LAWN) AREAS 2- ORGANIC MULCH vlEr/'l l �"' j I -f �Y.%/�i/�i/�/A _. CRASS: SEED OR soo 3" OF COMPOST - 1.75" OF COMPOST INCORPORATED INCORPORATED INTO 5' OF INTO 6.25" OF SITE SOIL (TOTAL SITE SOIL (TOTAL AMENDED AMENDED DEPTH OF 9.5'. FOR A DEPTH DF 9.5", FOR A SETTLED DEPTH OF 8") SETTLED DEPTH OF 87 6' SUBSOIL SCARIFIED 4" BELOW J SUBSOIL SCARIDED 4- BELOW COMPOST AMENOED LAYER �' (1 f N .7 COMPOST AMENDED LAYER (12" BELOW SOIL SURFACE) - _ ,L (12" BELOW SOIL SURFACE) T 12' OPTION 2 - AMEND IN PLACE OR STOCKPILE AND AMEND GENERAL NOTES: PLANTING BEDS TURF (LAWN) PNEAS 1. AREAS OF NO DISTURBANCE 2" ORGANIC ���%��� GRASS: SEED VEGETATIONS ALL BEFAND SOIL SHALL CED AND EXISTING BE MULCH �'. ����� o" OR SOD PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION _ IMPACTS. 2. TO MEASURE SETTLED DEPTH, FINISHED LEVEL OF 6' IMPORTED �- 8" IMPORTED WATER SOIL SUFFICIENTLY TO CONCRETES U RROUNDTO TOPSOIL MIX 'SI� TOPSOIL MI% FULLY SATURATE WITHOUT SEA 1/8"ABOVE (COMPACTED _ _ (COMPACTED CAUSING EROSION. DEPTH) - -m��- - DEPTH) TOP OF CHANNEL EDGE - = _ 3. COMPOST SHALL MEET SPEC. REQUIREMENTS IN THE 2017 EDMONES STORMWATER SURFACING PER SUBSOIL IS SUBSOIL IS ADDENDUM (CHECKLIST 7). SCARIFIED 6' y SCARIFIED 6" CIVIL DRAWINGS BELOW _�' `I. _ - INSTALL ACO DRAIN IMPORTED ti _ BELOW 4. COMPAC ION OF TOPSOIL (WHERE MODEL K100S OR EQUAL b Z TOPSOIL MIX IMPORTED REQUIRE]) TO BE TO BSR (MAX) 4" PVC PIPE TO _ ' _ 12' TOPSOIL MIX OF THE MAXIMUM CRY DENSITY ry CONVEYANCE PIPE PER MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST OPTION 3 - IMPORT TOPSOIL (ASTM 01557). CONCRETE 3000 PSI MIN REVISION DATE BEDDING LAYER CITY OF EDMONDS POST CONSTRUCTION SOIL DECEMBER 2017 -11I1 s -ili 1� PUBLC WORKS QUALITY AND DEPTH STANDARD II II ... Ih_ IIIL. III_IIL DEPARTMENT DETAIL 6 6 Fsf, 1890 "-ROVED BY: S D- 6 42 TRENCH DRAIN IN ASPHALT 1 j CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" SCALE: NTS RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE. - BY'. CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 12/ IA/ 20 w 0 DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 W a z Q 0 CV 0 w N 0 0 °� Q Z = N a Q o M o N Z J W Z Q Q ~ Z [V :2 =) Zo 0 0' LJ (n 00 LTJ 0 0 y SHEET C3.2 cd G O s LO r CD ''3^ v! Lo In O O 0 N Z J a d E s V y�Ml Q ad r- O CL d w M1J Cn C d E u a r a Packet Pg. 289 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C 6 N89°45'00"E 90.00' =r El 15 3. 9E 71 0 -4 '� WALL T0408.7 T412.5 YLL9 T1 <-) ID X �4"CED II I I ' I 4�'CED 1 � 24"CED gl .l�° ,"- 1 '1 ° /C a • 3333V ____ a °° .IL ° ° _ a a a V . •. _ a " \e °. ° O TYPE II CB W/ j - eUTILITY TRENCH- 133333� / - CONTROL STRUCTURE / RIM 408.82' / N 36' CMP 404.02': / 03,4.6'RESTORATION IE 4405.60/. C4 PAVEMENT / / - C4... e 1 klll klll klll - / / i '. SSMH - / / RIM 413.33 / - IE W. 8" CONC=405 - O +IF 38' L -/ E12' PV«12 260.00' 1 N89'45'00"E 6, 9.19' M 659.21"-P 2 3 8TH S TR E E \, S W H A N Y - - FL--1 ---- - -- ----------- ---- ----`------------ ------- ; WATER & SEWER PLAN- 1 10 0 5 10 20 WATER & SEWER PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL FINAL RESTORATION SHALL BE BY CONTRACTOR, NOT CITY OF EDMONDS' 2. BED AN D TRENCH PER CITY STD DETAI L GU-400. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. 4. FIRE SPRINKLER CONSULTANT TO VERIFY WATER METER AND SERVICE SIZE. 5. WATER SERVICE LINE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY WATER SERVICE LINE HANDOUT E-86. 6. ALL SEWER TO BE GASKETED SDR 35. RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DAIS BY: CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 ---- 12/IA/20 m 0 s c 0 a N Zm o v7 3 in d� Lo In u w °C a 0 O o � r Q w ry N N Z J Y a Q = DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP w CHECK: JPU S JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 a ad r- O CL cn Z J y E W/ u 0 a V) �i N W w N (n Q O Co w z ~ Z [V :2 Q D (D 0 N Co W SHEET C4.1 Packet Pg. 290 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, PROPERTY WAY/FINISH GRADE LINE GROUND/ROADWAY _ _ - ORILL HOLE FOR LOCATOR WIRE. II PROVIDE 12" MIN OF WIRE IN VALVE BOX II MAX. • SERVICE TAP TO MAN SHALL BE ANGLED AND NOT EXCEED 22 DEGREES MATERIAL LIST: OA 2" (IP TAP) DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE EQUAL TO OJ WHEN REPLACING EXISTING SERVICES: ROMAC STYLE 202'S EQUAL TO FORD VBB87-12HB-1177 O 2" BRASS IP BALL CORP WHEN PLACING NEW SERVICES 1177 BYPAS51: EQUAL TO FORD VBH87-12H6-1]7 © 2 - 2" BRASS STREET ELLS FOR SWING JOINT 0 METER BOOX ARMORCAST OD REHAU MUNICIPEX PIPE (2') WITH STAINLESS STEEL INSERT R LIDA800194 H7 ORAPPROVED EQUAL STRAIGHT WALL POLYMER BOX (NO OE 2" 1JIPT X CTS GRIP FITTING MOUSEHOLES) WITH 20K COVER WITH HINGED Cl READER OTRACER WIRE: #12 AWG. SOLID COPPER CLAD STEEL, HOPE O 2" BRASS PIPE (L.T.F) COATED. CONNECTION AT THE METER SETTER SHALL BE MADE WITH AN ALL STAINLESS STEEL HOSE CLAMP. O SCHEDULE 40 2" PVC CAP OR PLUG REMOVED CONNECTION AT MAIN LINE WIRE SHALL BE MADE WITH A WHEN CONNECTION MADE TO CUSTOMER SPUT-BOLT CONNECTOR. STRIP COATING PRIOR TO CONNECTION. WRAP WIRE AROUND PIPE. ON 4"x4"x8" CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORTS © BACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE (0) 2" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE (FIP x RP) WITH PROPERTY LINE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE SET IN DRIVEWAY AREAS 2• AWWA OPERATING NUT UNLESS LOCATION AND TRAFFIC RATED BOX IS APPROVED © 2 PIECE VALVE BOX - TOP SECTION TO BE RICH BY CITY ENGINEER, 940 STYLE 18" WITH REGULAR BASE SECTION O 2" BRASS ELL LENGTH TO FIT © WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING INSTALLED AND OI METER SPACER TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SPACER MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8 - 1/4" HOLES DRILLED IN SPACER BODY, CONNECTED AT METER SETTER BY OWNER/CONTRACTOR WA COMPRESSION FITTING OTE: NPROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING 1-1/2" OR 2" METER THROUGH THE CITY DEVELOPMENT 12;2• MIPT X I.P. COMPRESSION FITTING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. THE CITY WILL SUPPLY METER AFTER PURCHASE FOR CONTRACTOR INSTALL. IF 1-1/2" METER IS USED CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPLY REDUCERS TO CONNECT METIER. y 1 1 2 & 2" REVISION DATE NOVEMBER 2018 CITY OF EDMONDS W;T4 SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS INSTALLATION STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL WA-131 APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISN SEE COE STD DTL GU-410 CRUSHED PERRIAL COE(MOD 9I03.I6.A.2 0R SUITABLE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AS 6' MIN I / / / / / / / / / / // // / APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER / / (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) as 6" MIN I / // / // // / i / / SIN ATE 4 (IF REQUIRED) - 8" ININ SEE NOTE 1 - NOTES, I 1M WIDTH OF TRENCH AT TOP OF PIPE 36" FOR PIPE UP TO AND INCLUDING 12" DIAMETER O.D. PLUS 18" FOR PIPE LARGER THAN 12" NOMINAL DIAMETER 2. REFER TO Cltt OF DOMONOS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 OF WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIAL GRADATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL MEET A MINIMUM COMPACTION OF 95% DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557. 4. IF UNSTABLE MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED BELOW PIPE ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE AS REQUIRED BY CITY ENGINEER. REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS JANUARY 2018 TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION I w PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISN I GU - 400 TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. /(IF STUB FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) SEWER STUB SHALL BE LOCATED 10' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE & STAKED. PLACE 2"x4" TIMBER AT END OF SIDE SEWER STUB AND CUT TO LENGTH TO ENSURE 3 FEET EXTENDS ABOVE GRADE. PANT TOP 18 INCHES WHITE. IN 3 INCH HIGH LETTERS, STENCIL THE NUMBER OF EVEN FEEF FROM GROUND ELEVATION TO THE SEWER STUB INVERT. 8 GAUGE WIRE TO BE DOUBLE WRAPPED AROUND PIPE AND 2 x 4 STAKE AT OR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE CLEANOUT COVER STD DTL SS-200 22.5' OR 45' BEND o� 6" LATERAL SEWER 6" TEST TEE SLOPE - 2% MIN TO 50% MAX 6" WYE/6" ROMAC SADDLE SEE NOTES 1 AND 2 POSSIBLE 10' SEWER MAN LOCATION 22.5' OR 45' BEND 6" TEST TEE �I" TEE POSSIBLE SEWER MAN LOCATION NOTES: 1. WHEN TAPPING INTO EXISTING MAIN A ROMAC STYLE CB SADDLE SHALL BE USED. PLACEMENT OF TEE SHALL DEPEND ON DEPTH OF SEWER MAN. AS A MINIMUM, THE TEE SHALL BE PLACED AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM PIPE SPRINGLINE. 2. IF NEW MAN IS BEING INSTALLED OR MAIN IS BEING REPLACED, SERVICE CONNECTION TO THE MAIN SHALL BE DONE WITH A WYE. WYE SHALL BE AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM PIPE SPRINGLINE. 3. IF CONNECTING EXISTING PRIVATE SIDE SEWER TO NEW CITY LATERAL, A CONCRETE/PVC STRONGBACK FERNCO RC SERIES OR ROMAC COUPUNG SHALL BE USED AND SECURED PER MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS. 4. BORING OF SERVICES WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY IS NOT ALLOWED. 5. SEWER PIPE SMALL BE SDR-35 AND JOINTS SHALL BE GASKETED. 6. IF STUB FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, USE RUBBER JOINT BISCUIT PLUG OR OTHER APPROVED WATERTIGHT PLUG. y REVISION DATE NEW LATERAL SEWER CITY OF EDMONDS MAY 20,8 PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL Fs+39� APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISN SS-202 FINAL JOINT SHALL BE A NEAT STRAIGHT HMA CLASS 1/2" UNE. ALL EXPOSED VERTICAL EDGES SHALL PG 64-22 BE TACKED NEATLY PER WSDOT STANDARD (SEE NOTES 4 & 5) SPECIFICATIONS 5-04.3(5)A APPROVED TACK OR APPROVED EQUAL AND SEALED PER 1' WSDOT STD 5-04.3(5)C. SLOPE EXCAVATION TO AVOID UNDERMINING EXISTING PAVEMENT. EXISTING. ............... .... HMA ... .. ...... ... ....... ....... ... . .. \/�\/ 4 c ..d ... ......ad...\% EXISTING CRUSHED SURFACE BASE IMPORT OR NATIVE MATERIAL COURSE PER WSDOT STD SPEC 9-03.9(3) (SEE NOTE 3) BACKA SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY (SEE NOTE 2) TRENCH WIDTH NOTES: 1. SEE CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 OF THE CURRENT WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFlWNG REQUIREMENTS. 2. SUBMIT PROCTOR AND DENSITY TESTS FROM CERTIFIED TESTING COMPANIES DOCUMENTING THAT THE BACKFlLL MEETS A MINIMUM OF 95% DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557. 3. CSBC DEPTH SHAL BE A MINIMUM 6" OR MATCH EXISTING WHICHEVER IS GREATER. WHEN MATCHING EXISTING CSBC DEPTH GREATER THEN 6", THEN CSBC SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MULTIPLE EQUAL THICKNESS LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 6". 4. ROADWAY HMA DEPTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" THICK, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ANY DEPTH GREATER THAN 4" SHALL MATCH EXISTING. 5. ALLEY HMA DEPTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" THICK. UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, ANY DEPTH GREATER THAN 2" SHALL MATCH EXISTING. 6. UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, THE HMA SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MULTIPLE EQUAL THICKNESS LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 2". 7. FINAL PAVEMENT JOINTS SHALL BE NEATLY AND UNIFORMILY SEALED WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 5-04.3(5)C APPROVED JOINT SEALANT OR APPROVED EQUAL. REVISION DATE v CITY OF EDMONDS TYPICAL HMA AND JANUARY 2018 UTILITY PATCH PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGUSH GU-410 BEND AND CAP (MAX) TO EXCEED 100' BETWEEN CT CLEANOUT(WYE E WITH CAP AND CLEANOUT COVER) AND CONCRETE LEVEUNG COLLAR u 12" LOCKING COVER y ; SEE NOTE 3 12"4 FINISHED GRADE END OF PIPER GRIPPER PLUG SEE Z 27061 OR APPROVED EQUAL) WATER TIGHT CAP RISER LEVELING COLLA2 45' SEE NOTE 4 45' 12" PVC SLEEVE 8" RISER 4" OR 6" SIDE SEWER 6" WYE AND `6" CITY STUB GENERAL CLEANOUT DETAIL 4F BEND 4" OR 6" - 12" LOCKING COVER SIDE SEWER CLEANOUT DETAIL Z ii SEE NOTE 3 AT PROPERTY LINE/CITY EASEMEN T �w d LEVEUNG COLLAR NOTES: Q o SEE NOTE 4 ASPHALT SURFACE 1. SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SDR-35 AND JOINTS SHALL BE GASKETED. 12"f 2. PIPE SLOPE TO BE 2R MIN AND UP TO 50% MAX. 3.SEWER CLEANOUT COVER TO BE EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 1 F00T LONG 12" PVCPRODUCT #00366102 STAR PIPE COSP48L OR APPROVED 7___ SLEEVEEQUAL. e" END OF PIPE GRIPPER 4. LEVEUNG COLIAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS FOLLOWS: PLUG (CHERNE 270261 OR APPROVED EQUAL) IN ROADWAYS PER COE STD DWG GU-424 TYPICAL CLEANOUT IN SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPED AREAS. EITHER 24"x24"x6" UNDER ASPHALT OR CONCRETE DEEP CONCRETE COLLAR OR 24" DIAMETER x 6" DEEP CONCRETE COLLAR y REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS JANUARY 2018 SEWER CLEANOUT DETAILS PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISN SS- ZOO RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE. - BY'. CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION C � ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 O cV W (V) M 00 O = 0 Q F- II W N Z 0 rn O Z CV M (o 0 00 LLJ SHEET C4.2 O O v! Lo Ln O O CD O N Z J d to C E u w Q old L O Q (D w Co E V M Q Packet Pg. 291 1 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C 6 \ I 1 I 1 � 1 N \ O �413,:--- -- {y! F[N R\\\ W/EP I' N■ _ ; \ ■ ■ _ r 18T6E'C-, r ,, .. CL \\T{ Q `4�- I N w 18"CON -- l 12"CON I`- 18"CON II 18"CON F7lJ.- LJO24 CON7I \ WORO` Y� M 1 EXISTING BUILDING - DECK x 12"CED 8"CED 2-12"Cd N89'45'00"E 90.00' ------- 2-12 I\ I Z I� I "ISO"CE -----`----- j � T a I. _ I 24"CAD /////////////1 I I ------------ x----� ,,tt a2 18"CqD z ----------------------- 0 j2-12 D� x o -� 18"CE I I 18"CED N CD 4"CED I I X. 33 I LDG. I 24"C D 3 I I \ I C X �4"CED I a N»CED ---------------- 3 L— ---- ---J 1 _ 3 � 24\\ q I "CED - O LL 90.80' / SSMH RIM=413.33 IIE - O O �! WORK ZONE 1 3 W 8�" CONC-405.38' _ T - N89°45'00"E 61 9.19'—M - 659.21P 3,3333,; 2MTH STREE , SW (HANE ddRY. DJ 1 \ r T TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DETAIL 2 FOR TYPICAL TRAFFIC CONTROL SYMBOLS, SIGN SPACING, ETC. 2. WORK EXPECTED TO OCCUR DURING STANDARD WORK HOURS, OR AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF EDMON DS. 3. WORKZONES: WORK ZONE 1, 238TH ST SW UTILITY WORK IN STREET PER DETAIL 3. WORKZONE2: DRIVEWAY PAVING FROM ALLEYWAY TO TOWNHOUSES PER DETAIL4. 4. WORK ZONES I, 2 AND 3 WILL REQUIRE PARKING STALL AND SIDEWALK CLOSURES FOR A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH DURING CONSTRUCTION. Figure 6H-10. Lane Closure on aTwo-Lane Road Using Flaggers (TA-10) Note. Sea Tables aF Tor the meenir mbols andlr des used In Typical Application 10 3 SCALE: NTS MUTCD DETAIL Table 6H-2. Meaning of Symbols on Typical Application Diagrams ® Arrow board � Snatlowvehlcle O O O Arrowhoardeupport ortraller ow (shown lacing down) r F Sign (shown facing left) Changeable message sign or support troller ® Surveff Chan -Inning device Temporary re— ® Crash cushion ® Temporary banner wdlh earning light I� Direction ot temporary traffic detour Traffic or pedeahan signal y Direction of traffic Flagger ® Truck -mounted aftenuator Type 3oanlcatle High-level warning device (lag (Flag tree) Wflming light 0 Longdudfnalchannalfzing device woo space wminalre \\\\\Pavement markings that should DQ Pave ed t a long-term shield EM Work vehlole Table 6H.3. Meaning of Letter Codes on Typical Application Diagrams Road Type Dlarenos Detwesnslpnn" A B C Ilaun 0w sP.ea)' Isobel 1od- iww uro-Irian �eeal dsober 350 rear zw bar aural spobot 500 feet sop bet spem groom robe aerennmeaWnion.ar eora "8 wrmnreaae BeM rt neammaoneenwr Th to i as If TnaA ammYonsme wa me euns,bonappmofd aop ram, arer' n r epeu mearoer arr.se5meo-sana w«v��nar�a esro�nc roo.�ine mio reel. ne ev(me wevn�r u�wa mn�ma rc ron..l Table 6H-4. Formulas for Determining Taper Length spemis> raper Lenytnlu In teat 65 mpn pr L_ Yle Where: L ==oel aXsem tt 5 =po&ea aPoea emit orolryeU 65me ePeea Prier ro work a6rAna, or mee —enatl,epeba 2 SCALE: NTS MUTCD TABLES Figure 6H3. Work on the Shoulders (TA-3) 111(ll0N \ ♦ aro■ ` � T * Shoulder la per (see Note 7) aTmnaxs 1 T 1 sx6ULDER y � HORN i-� XNOM �� tl301nOHS a L T ~ - Shoulder taper Shoulder taper (see Note 7) 1 T T 4* woRN Note: See TeNas 6112 and 6H-5 B the meaning of the sy a edNorhatter des codes used in this figure. Typical Application 3 4 MUTCD DETAIL SCALE: NITS RECEIVED December 15, 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 -�_ 121 /20 N d O s O CD Zm o w 3 fn LO WW 0 O o a . r o W� v N N Z J Y a Q > y �+ = DESIGN: TAF DRAWN: JCP CHECK: JPU S JOB NO: 18322.20 DATE: 12/14/20 Q ad r- O Q d y Z Q � U V +� J 0 0 a [if w04 ( 0 DO 0 N a 0 z U 0DOvi U Lk1 N Z L 0 L- lT 0 � D CD 0 (n 00 U-1 y SHEET C5.1 Packet Pg. 292 1 Body Color - Sherwin Williams - SW 6142 Macadamia (R: 204 G: 183 B: 155) Trim Color - Sherwin Williams - SW 7507 Stone Lion (R: 179 G: 164 B: 145) ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 293 C � ENGINEERING 250 4th Ave S Ste 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (425) 778-8500 Fax: (425) 778-5536 civil & structural engineering & planning DRAINAGE REPORT Sunde Townhomes 8629 2381h St SW Edmonds, WA 98026 1211412020 CG Project No.: 18322.20 ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 294 Table of Contents Section I — Project Overview Section II — Off -Site Analysis Section III — Permanent Stormwater Control Plan Section IV —Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Section V — Special Reports and/or Studies Section VI — Other Permits Section VII — Bond Quantities & Operation and Maintenance Manual C 4M 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 295 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section I, Page 1 Section I — Project Overview Section I Summary Overview Existing Condition Developed Condition Minimum Requirements Overview This drainage report has been written for a new five -unit townhome development on a 0.25 ac lot. The existing lot is occupied by a single-family residence with a driveway and walkways. All will be demolished. Site Address: 8629 2381" St SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 Parcel Number: 00463300700302 Zoning: RM-1.5 Watershed: Edmonds Way The proposed townhouse units will be contained within two separate buildings, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will have an associated garage, driveway and walkways. The buildings will have cumulative roof area of approximately 5,243 sf (0.120 ac) and the total new impervious area for the project is approximately 7,818 sf (0.179 ac). Since the project is located in the Edmonds Way Watershed and will discharge to Puget Sound through the City's MS4, the project must comply with the Direct Discharge Requirements (a) and (b) per the Edmonds Community Development Code (herein referred to as ECDC) 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and the June 2017 Addendum to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 (herein referred to as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum), Chapter 3.1.3.1. Direct Discharge projects are required to implement specific BMPs to the maximum extent feasible and comply with the Edmonds Way Specific requirements (see Section III for more). Existing Condition The site is currently developed with a house, driveway and walkways on a mostly -rectangular, approximately 10,836 sf (0.25 ac) lot. Other ground cover includes large and small trees, shrubs and grass. Site topography generally descends from NE to SW with an average slope of about 11%. An alleyway, which is the proposed access for the site, borders the site on the west, the Fir Grove Townhomes development borders the site on the north, the Park Place Apartments are to the east, and 238t" St SW borders the site on the south side. The front of the house faces 238t" St SW and access to the existing driveway is from this street. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 296 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section I, Page 2 According to City of Edmonds GIS map, the storm and sewer utilities are located in the north portion of 238th St SW and the water main is located in the south portion of 238th St SW. There are existing catch basins in the alleyway and in the north edge of 238th St SW. The site does not appear to take on any significant upstream flows. The site is located in the Edmonds Way Watershed. According to the Geotechnical Engineering Report by Associated Earth Sciences (AES), the site soils generally consist of fill and lodgement till. AES dug one exploration pit 10' deep in the southern half of the lot. In the top 1-2 feet, fill soils were found that were made up of loose, moist, gray, silty sand, with gravel and asphalt debris. The remaining 8' of the exploration pit was made up of weathered lodgement till and lodgement till, which consists mostly of dense, moist, silty sand. More about the soils can be found in Section V in the Geotechnical Engineering Report. The existing impervious areas are as follows: Impervious Areas Roof (incl. sheds): 1,966 sf (0.045 ac) Walkways: 199 sf (0.004 ac) Driveway (incl. Private Rd): 1,074 sf (0.025 ac) Total: 3,239 sf (0.074 ac) Developed Condition The project consists of the construction of a 5-unit townhome development with associated walkways and driveways. The units will be contained within two separate buildings and each unit will have an associated garage, driveway and walkways. All existing impervious surfaces will be removed. The total of new plus replaced impervious surface is approximately 7,818 sf (0.179 ac). Disturbance is expected to affect the entire lot. The proposed access to the site is from an existing 20' paved access road off of 2381h St SW that currently serves as the access road to the Fir Grove Townhomes, which lie just north of the project lot. The site will utilize a 36" detention pipe with a flow control structure in the south portion of the site that will discharge to an existing storm drain pipe at the intersection of the private road and 2381h St SW. All runoff on -site will drain to the detention pipe either through roof drains or trench drains and catch basins with conveyance pipes. See civil plans and Section III for more. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 297 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section I, Page 3 The proposed impervious areas (including the private road) are as follows: Impervious Areas Roof: 5,243 sf (0.120 ac) Walkways: 360 sf (0.008 ac) Driveway, Mod: 1,711 sf (0.039 ac) Driveway (Private Rd), Mod: 504 sf (0.012 ad Total: 7,818 sf (0.179 ac) The new and replaced pollution -generating impervious areas are as follows: Pollution -generating impervious areas Driveway, Mod: 1,711 sf (0.039 ac) Driveway (Private Rd), Mod: 504 sf (0.012 ad Total: 2,215 sf (0.051 ac) Lot Area: 0.25 ac New/Repl. Hard Surfaces: 0.18 ac PGHS/PGIS: 0.05 ac Land Disturbance: 0.25 ac Average Slope: I I% (NE to SW) 23713 I 51� i� 1-9. 238THSTSW 21F4, 23800 86 . 3802 23804 23810 73nl 23 81:2 TS 8828 23 F3819 12 123816 23820 123822� 23824 8608 ,23 6222 23 b71 8621j ��. PROJECT SITE 1 '_. 5 F517 Z38TFSrSW 238U5 860� 850, 23815 Q� Figure 1-1. Vicinity map (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). a� E 0 z c 3 0 m c 0 LO LO 0 O M 0 N Z J 9, N c N E a 06 r_ 0 Q d N C d t v tv .r a 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 298 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section I, Page 4 16-53 ' 615 'i 16-53�Ps'j 14 Q '-29 16-6.b S o `j ITv) OQ L 00 P�1626 4 16-421 11 16-420 16-419 16-419 Figure 1-2. Map showing storm pipe location, material, size, and flow direction in front of project lot (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). c V_ GA 9 Figure 1-3. Aerial image (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). X represents approximate geotechnical exploration pit location. C GM ENGINEERING 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.42S.778.SS36 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 299 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section I, Page 5 Minimum Requirements Stormwater requirements were determined per the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, the ECDC, and Ecology's 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (herein referred to as the SWMMWW). This report is based on the steps outlined in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the SWMMWW and Checklists that are introduced in Chapter 7 and provided in Appendix C of the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The project is classified as a Direct Discharge project and must meet the requirements of ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Minimum Requirements #1-9. Minimum Requirement #1: Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans: The stormwater site plan consists of this report and the civil drawings, and is prepared in accordance with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Minimum Requirement #2: Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation that addresses the 13 elements of Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. See Section IV and the civil drawings. Minimum Requirement #3: Source Control of Pollution: All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the City. Pollutant source -specific BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management can be found in the SWMMWW Volume IV, S411. The Operation & Maintenance Manual found in Section VII addresses Lawn/Vegetation management. Minimum Requirement #4: Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls: Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient properties. All projects shall submit an off -site qualitative analysis. A qualitative analysis of the upstream and downstream system entering the site is presented in Section 11. Minimum Requirement #5: On -Site Stormwater Management: The project is located in the Edmonds Way Watershed and is classified as Direct Discharge. Therefore, the project must meet the requirements of ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv. Direct Discharge projects must implement specific BMPs to the maximum extents feasible and comply with the Edmonds Way specific requirements if applicable. A detention pipe and flow control structure were designed to comply with the Edmonds Way Specific Requirements (see Section III for more). Minimum Requirement #6: Runoff Treatment: This requirement applies to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment facilities: i.) Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or ii.) projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including permeable pavements is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 300 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section I, Page 6 system from the site. The proposed roof is consistently called out to be coated with an inert, non - leachable enamel coating on civil, structural and architectural plans. Therefore, this project's total of PGHS is less than 5,000 square feet and runoff treatment is not required. Minimum Requirement #7: Flow Control: Projects must provide flow control to reduce the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions. According to ECDC 18.30.060.D.7.a, Flow Control in accordance with Minimum Requirement #7 is not required for projects that discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound. This project is located in the Edmonds Way Watershed and will discharge stormwater runoff to Puget Sound through the City's MS4. Therefore, Flow Control per Minimum Requirement #7 is not required to be implemented on this project. Minimum Requirement #8: Wetland Protection: Wetland Protection requirements apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system. This project site's stormwater does not discharge into a wetland and does not require wetland protection. Minimum Requirement #9: Operation and Maintenance: An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The party (or parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and maintenance manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the property to the new owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained in the appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken shall be kept and be available for inspection. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 301 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section I, Page 7 Does the project result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surfke area? OR Dots the land disturbing activity total 7,000 square feet or greater? as 140 inirnum ReyuircmcnLs No. ] through 5 apply Minimum Rcquircmcnt Na 2 applies Next Question Doc- the project add 5,000 square feet or marry ofnew plus replaced hard surfaces? OR Convert 0.75 acre- or more of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas`' OR Convert 2.S acres or metre of nauve vegetation to pasture? (ND Yea Is this a rtxtd related project? I All Minimum Rcquircments apply to the new and replaced Yet hard-urfaces and camrrted vegetation areas_ All MLnirnurn Requirements apply to the new hard surfaces and converted vegetation are -as. yes Does the project add 5,000 square feet or more ofnrw hard surfaces? Yes Do new bard surfaces add 50% or morn; to the existing hard surfaces within the project limits? No No No Noadditrondl rcquirernui Figure 1-4. Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for Development (Figure 3.1 in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum). C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 302 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section II, Page 1 Section II — Off -Site Analysis Section II Summary Task 1 — Define and map the study area Task 2 — Review all available information of the study area Task 3 — Field inspect the area Task 4 - Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems Task 1— Define and map the study area An initial qualitative analysis shall document potential off -site impacts of stormwater discharges for each upstream drainage system entering a site, and each downstream drainage system leaving a site according to Section 6.2 of the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The downstream analysis shall extend from the project site for a minimum of one -quarter of a mile. The downstream flowpath is outlined below in Figure II-1 from the City GIS map. 43 E "` /_ Jam// I r' r•:1'.IN � l EDIV0.DND5 a ' r� OUTFILLI. I s _ 526T27N Rif a�Q �y q4 52 — ¢ P NCIE O ti U 17 O? 59 I I 53 If 7 L' r-I �Ff Y 4F jj Figure II-1. Map showing stormwater flow path and distance from site to outfall (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). Task 2 — Review all available information on the study area Existing stormwater improvements were determined from the survey and the City GIS map. Runoff from the site will enter the City's MS4 within one -quarter mile since the project proposes to connect into an existing storm drain pipe on the north edge of 238t" St SW, which conveys runoff to the public main in the C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 a www.cgengine Packet Pg. 303 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section II, Page 2 street. The main connects into a main that runs north down Edmonds Way that eventually makes its way to Puget Sound through a series of 36" to 48" concrete and corrugated metal pipes. The outfall is a little over 3 miles from the project site. Per the City GIS map, the site may contain erosion hazard areas. An erosion hazard area map can be seen below in Figure II-2. The site is within the Edmonds Way Watershed. The Edmonds Way Watershed conveys stormwater through underground pipes along Edmonds Way until approximately Pine St where it breaks off west to Puget Sound. Figure II-2. Erosion hazard area map (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). Task 3 — Field inspect the study area A site visit was done on the afternoon of November 29, 2018. The weather was cloudy and it had lightly rained that day. From evaluating surrounding conditions, the site does not appear to take on significant upstream runoff. Runoff from the property upstream to the north is directed away from the site toward the alleyway where runoff flows into catch basins. The project proposes to tie all impervious areas to a detention pipe prior to discharging into the existing storm drain pipe on 238th St SW. On the following page, Figure II-3 shows a picture from the NW corner of the site looking downstream. The catch basins in the alley and along 238th St SW appeared to be free of problems. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 304 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section II, Page 3 Figure II-3. In alleyway west of site, facing south. Figure II-4. In alleyway west of site, facing east/site. C � ENGINEERING a� E O t c 3 O (D c LO LO 0 0 a) 0 N z J d N C O E t V R Q Oa r O CL d R N r C d E t v R r.+ Q 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 305 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section II, Page 4 Figure II-5. In alleyway west of site, facing south. Figure II-6. In 238th St SW west of site, facing north. C GM ENGINEERING 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 306 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section II, Page 5 Figure II-7. On south edge of site, facing north. Figure II-8. Near SE corner of site, facing north. C � ENGINEERING a� E O z c 3 O m c 3 LO LO O O M O N z J d m. C N E t V R r r Q 06 r- O O_ d R N r C d E t v R r a 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 307 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section II, Page 6 Figure II-9. On site facing west. Figure II-10. In 238th St SW, facing west. C CM ENGINEERING 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 308 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section II, Page 7 Task 4 — Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems Existing stormwater improvements were determined from the survey and the City GIS map. This is described in Task 2. The site is located in the Edmonds Way Watershed and, therefore, a detention system has been designed per the "Edmonds Way specific requirements" (ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iv.b). The project proposes to route all runoff from impervious surfaces of the site to a 36" detention pipe system with a flow control structure to meet the on -site stormwater management requirements (see Section III for more). The system will discharge into an existing storm drain pipe on 238t" St SW (see Figure II-1 for downstream flowpath). There are no anticipated problems with the proposed detention system. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 309 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section III, Page 1 Section III — Permanent Stormwater Control Plan Section III Summary Narrative Feasibility Review Edmonds Way Specific Requirements Detention Calculations WWHM Report Narrative The proposed project is classified as Direct Discharge per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv. Stormwater BMPs (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv.b) must be implemented to the maximum extents feasible and comply with the Edmonds Way specific requirements as applicable to meet Minimum Requirement #5. See feasibility review and Edmonds Way specific requirements below. Runoff treatment and standard flow control are not required for this project (see Minimum Requirements #6 & #7 in Section 1). Feasibility Review The project must implement on -site stormwater management BMPs to the maximum extents feasible per Minimum Requirement #5. According to ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iv, projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound do not have to achieve the LID Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full dispersion. Alternatively, the following BMPs were evaluated per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iv.a for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed: 1. Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW will be used for all disturbed pervious areas. 2. Downspout Full Infiltration Systems (BMP T5.10A) are infeasible because the site soils consist of fill and lodgement till, which are unsuitable for infiltration. The geotechnical engineer states that the "lodgement till is not a suitable receptor for infiltration of stormwater due to its extremely low hydraulic conductivity." See Section V for more about infiltration infeasibility. Downspout Dispersion Systems (BMP T5.106) and Perforated Stub -out Connections (BMP T5.10C) are infeasible because there is no room on -site within the required setbacks for such systems. 3. Concentrated Flow Dispersion (BMP T5.11) and Sheet Flow Dispersion (BMP T5.12) are infeasible because there is no room on -site within the required setbacks for such systems. None of the above On -site Stormwater Management BMPs were determined to be feasible for this project. Therefore, the Edmonds Way specific requirements must be met to satisfy the on -site stormwater management requirement for this project. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 310 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section III, Page 2 Edmonds Way Specific Requirements Since the above stormwater BMPs were determined to be infeasible, all remaining project site runoff from unmanaged surfaces must be mitigated per the following requirement: the post -development 10- and 100-year recurrence interval peak flows shall not exceed 0.25 and 0.45 cubic feet per second per acre of impervious surface area, respectively. In order to achieve this peak flow threshold, a flow control structure was designed and is described below. Detention Calculations WWHM 2012 was used to model the project and design the detention pipe (WWHM report on the following pages). As was stated before, the post -development 10-year and 100-year recurrence interval peak flows are not to exceed 0.25 and 0.45 cfs per acre of impervious surface area, respectively, for all project site runoff from unmanaged surfaces (see calculations below). As can be seen on the WWHM report, the detention pipe was designed per the Edmonds Way specific requirements. A 36" diameter, 49 If long detention pipe was designed for this project (see civil plans for more). 10 —year peak flow = 0.25 cfs * 0.179 acres = 0.0448 cfs 1 acre 100 — year peak f low = 0.45 cfs * 0.179 acres = 0.0806 cfs 1 acre C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 311 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section III, Page 3 WWHM Report - Edmonds Way Specific Requirements WWHM2012 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: Sunde Townhomes - Edmonds Way Specific Requirements Site Name: Sunde Townhomes Site Address: 8629 238th St SW City Edmonds Report Date: 12/6/2018 MGS Regoin Puget East Data Start 1901/10/1 Data End : 2058/09/30 DOT Data Number: 03 Version Date: 2017/04/14 Version : 4.2.13 Low Flow Threshold for POC 1 : 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC 1: 50 year PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use C, Forest, Mod Pervious Total Impervious Land Use Impervious Total Basin Total acre .26 0.26 acre 0 0.26 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow MITIGATED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use C, Lawn, Mod C GM ENGINEERING acre .081 Groundwater a� E 0 t c 3 0 m c 3 LO LO 0 0 am 0 N Z J d N c m E t U 0 r Q 06 t± 0 a m N r c m E t .r r a 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 312 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section III, Page 4 Pervious Total 0.081 Impervious Land Use acre ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.12 DRIVEWAYS MOD 0.051 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.008 Impervious Total 0.179 Basin Total 0.26 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Tank 1 Tank 1 Name Tank 1 Tank Name: Tank 1 Depth: 3 ft. Tank Type Circular Diameter 3 ft. Length : 49 ft. Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2.9 ft. Riser Diameter: 12 in. Orifice 1 Diameter: 0.90625 in. (29/32") Elevation: 0 ft. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 ANALYSIS RESULTS Stream Protection Duration Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.26 Total Impervious Area:O Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.081 Total Impervious Area:0.179 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.004435 5 year 0.007364 10 year 0.009026 25 year 0.01076 C 4m ENGINEERING a� E 0 t c 3 0 H m c 3 LO LO 0 0 M 0 N Z J d N c m E t v 0 r r Q 06 t± 0 O_ m N r c m E t U 2 .r r a 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 313 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section III, Page 5 50 year 0.011807 100 year 0.012678 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.027764 5 year 0.036998 10 year 0.044365 < 0.0448 cfs 25 year 0.055217 50 year 0.064513 100 year 0.074931 < 0.0806 cfs Perind and Impind Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying documentation are provided 'as -is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by End User. Clear Creek Solutions Inc. and the governmental licensee or sublicensees disclaim all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions Inc. be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions Inc. or their authorized representatives have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Software Copyright © by Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. 2005-2018; All Rights Reserved. 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 314 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section IV, Page 1 Section IV — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Section IV Summarv: Narrative Erosion control details are provided that are consistent with the City of Edmonds guidelines. Erosion control plan sheets are provided in full size as part of the civil drawing set. A construction SWPPP is required for all projects which result in 2,000 sf or more of new plus replaced hard surface area. See civil sheet C2.1 for Temporary Erosion Control Plan. The elements for Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention are discussed as follows: Element 1: Mark Clearing Limits To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits of construction will be clearly marked before land -disturbing activities begin. Clearing limits will be to the extents of necessary land disturbance for the new townhouse buildings and associated driveways and walkways. The BMP relevant to marking the clearing limits that will be applied for this project includes: High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) Element 2: Establish Construction Access Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. The existing driveway should be used for construction access until it is required to be removed for proposed construction activity. Element 3: Control Flow Rates The site slopes on average about 11% from NE to SW and the site is small enough that a filter fabric fence used for Element 4 is expected to be sufficient to control flow rates. Element 4: Install Sediment Controls All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal BMP before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged. Filter fabric fence should be installed on the downstream edges (west and south) of the site. Pollution prevention facilities on the erosion control plan must be constructed prior to or in conjunction with all clearing and grading so as to ensure that the transport of sediment to surface waters and adjacent properties is minimized. The specific BMP to be used for controlling sediment on this project includes: Silt Fence (BMP C233) C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 315 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section IV, Page 2 Element 5: Stabilize Soils Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be used on this project include: Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) Mulching (BMP C121) Nets and Blankets (BMP C122) Plastic Covering (BMP C123) Sodding (BMP C124) Topsoiling/Composting (BMP C125) Surface Roughening (BMP C130) Dust Control (BMP C140) Element 6: Protect Slopes There are existing surfaces that will be removed as part of the development. Exposed slopes shall be stabilized with BMPs found in Element 5. Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets Existing drain inlets (within 100' of site) along 2381h St SW and in the alley and those made operable on - site must be protected from sedimentation. Stormwater shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or treated to remove sediment. Inlet protection devices shall be cleaned or removed and replaced when sediment has filled one-third of the available storage (or as specified by the manufacturer). The specific BMP to be used for protecting drain inlets is: Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets Conveyance channels requiring stabilization are not located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site Element 9: Control Pollutants Design, install, implement and maintain effective pollution prevention measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants. The suggested BMPs are: Concrete Handling (BMP C151) Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution Prevention (BMP C152) Material Delivery, Storage and Containment (BMP C153) Element 10: Control De -Watering De -watering is not expected to be necessary for this site. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 316 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section IV, Page 3 Element 11: Maintain BMPs All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Element 12: Manage the Project • Phase development projects to the maximum degree practicable and take into account seasonal work limits. • Inspection and monitoring— Inspect, maintain, and repair all BMPs as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Conduct site inspections and monitoring in accordance with the Construction Stormwater General Permit or local plan approval authority. • Maintain an Updated Construction SWPPP - This SWPPP shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site. The SWPPP shall be modified whenever there is a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has, or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. The SWPPP shall be modified if, during inspections or investigations conducted by the owner/operator, or the applicable local or state regulatory authority, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site. The SWPPP shall be modified as necessary to include additional or modified BMPs designed to correct problems identified. Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within seven (7) days following the inspection. Element 13: Protect Low Impact Development BMPs There are no LID BMPs proposed for this site. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 317 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section V, Page 1 Section V — Special Reports and/or Studies Section V Summary: Narrative The following reports are included in this section: 1. Infiltration Infeasibility Email from Bruce Blyton, PE of Associated Earth Sciences, Inc, dated November 9, 2018. 2. Geotechnical Engineering Report by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated January 8, 2008. 3. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Map dated October 4, 2018. C CM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 318 Taylor A. Fleming From: Bruce L. Blyton [mailto:bblyton@aesgeo.com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 9:27 AM To: Jared Underbrink <JaredU@cgengineering.com> Cc: Matthew A. Miller <mmiller@aesgeo.com> Subject: Edmonds Townhomes Stormwater infiltration, 8629 238th Street SW Edmonds, WA KE070610 Jared, Per your request, I have reviewed AESI's September 9, 2007 Geotechnical Report for the subject site to evaluate the potential for stormwater infiltration. Our exploration pit on the site encountered 1.5 feet of fill overlying medium dense to dense Vashon Lodgement Till. Lodgement till is not a suitable receptor for infiltration of stormwater due to its extremely low hydraulic conductivity. In Section 4.3 of the report, we discuss the likelihood of perched groundwater developing on the upper surface of the till due to this condition. We do not recommend stormwater infiltration on this site. If you have any questions concerning this e-mail, please feel free to contact me or Matt Miller (cc'd). -Bruce Bruce L. Blyton, P.E. I Sr. Principal a s s o c i a t e d a I earth sciences p o r a t e d bblyton@aesgeo.com I www.aesgeo.com Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5t" Avenue I Kirkland, Washington 98033 O 1 425-827-7701 F 1 425-827-5424 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. as E 0 z c 3 O F_ m c 3 0 0 C6 CDTMM N Z J d U) c m E z U 0 r Q 06 r_ O O_ d R N r C d E t v R r a Packet Pg. 319 Associated IN 0 M /25 Vmff/r `, January 8, 2008 Project No. EE070610A TNT, LLC 15030 59 h Drive SE Snohomish, Washington 98296 Attention: Mr. Troy Remneke Subject: Plan Review Edmonds Condominiums 8629 238`h Street SW Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Remneke; We have completed a plan review for the proposed residence to be constructed at 8629 238`h Street SW in Edmonds, Washington. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) viewed a set of structural plans provided by Sound Structural Solutions. AESI reviewed Sheets S-1 through S-3, dated May 16, 2007, and Sheets S-4 through S-6, dated April 24, 2007. AESI noted the following discrepancies from our September 9, 2007 geotechnical report titled "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Edmonds Condominiums, Edmonds Washington". 1. AESI recommends that our geotechnical report be referenced on the Sound Structural Solutions plan set. 2. Slab moisture protection is not addressed in these structural plans. In the geotechnical report, AESI recommended a vapor retarder and capillary, break material be used where slab moisture is to be controlled. Our recommendations can be found in Section 12.0, "Floor Support," of the geotechnical report. 3. Footing drains and recommended backfill for foundation and/or retaining walls in the structural plan set does not conform to recommendations found in AESI's report. The structural plan set shows a footing drain above adjacent footings and specifies that a "gravel pocket" surround the drainpipe. AESI recommends that Kirkland Office • 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • Kirk6nd, WA 98033 • P (425) 827-7701 • F (425) 827-5424 Everett Office • 2911 1/2 HewittAvenue, Suite 2 •Everett, WA 98201 • P (425) 259-0522 • F (425) 252340 packet Pg. 320 wwwae.cam.cnm foundation drains consist of perforated pipe set a few inches below footings and that foundation walls be lined with a minimum, 12-inch-thick, washed gravel blanket extending to within 1 foot of finished grades. Our recommendations for footing drains are found in Section 13.0, "Drainage Considerations," of the geotechnical report. 4. AESI recommends that a bearing soil evaluation be performed prior to the placement of concrete for footings. Due to limited site access, AESI was unable to perform more than one exploration on -site and recognized that previously placed fill may underlie portions of the proposed construction that were not accessible at the time of our initial explorations. AESI recommends that foundations be cast in medium dense to dense lodgement till or approved structural fill. Previously placed fill or similar loose soils are not considered suitable foundation subgrades. With the exceptions listed above, AESI found the structural plans to be in general accordance with the recommendations found in our September 9, 2007 geotechnical report. We hope this information serves your present needs. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Everett, Washington Edwardo Garcia, P.E. Project Engineer_ BLBIts EE070610A8 Projects\2007061 MEEMP ,Jg 1� :7 Principal Engineer 2 Packet Pg. 321 Geotechnical Engineering Water Resources Environmental Assessments and Remediation Sustainable Development Services Geologic Assessments Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds, Washington Prepared for Project No. EE070610A September 20, 2007 Packet Pg. 322 Associated Sciences, Inc® N [11 N 0 M Ce[hra6nj owr 25 veaff q f yen ce September 20, 2007 Project No. EE070610A TNT, LLC 15030 59'h Drive SE Snohomish, Washington 98296 Attention: Mr. Troy Remneke Subject: Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Condominiums 8629 238h Street SW Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Remneke: We are pleased to present the enclosed copies of the above -referenced report. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and geotechnical engineering studies, and offers geotechnical recommendations for the design and development of the property. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, we are here to assist you. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Everett, Washington i ' 4, Edwards Garcia, P.E. Project Engineer EG/ld EE070610A5 ProjeUs\2007061MEE\ W P Kirkland ® Everett ® Tacoma 425-827-7701 425-259-0522 253-722-2992 www.aesgeo.com Packet Pg. 323 Prepared for: TNT, LLC 15030 59" Drive SE Snohomish, Washington 98296 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 2911 1/2 Hewitt Avenue, Suite 2 Everett, Washington 98201 425-259-0522 Fax: 425-252-3408 September 20, 2007 Project No. EE070610A Packet Pg. 324 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Project and Site Conditions 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Edmonds Condominiums project located at 8629 238" Street SW, Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). The approximate location of the exploration accomplished for this study is presented on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of the new condominiums are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to obtain subsurface data to be used in the design and development of the subject property. Our study included reviewing available geologic literature, observing the excavation of one exploration pit on -site, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Geologic hazard evaluations and geotechnical engineering studies were also conducted to determine the type of suitable foundation, allowable foundation soil bearing pressures, anticipated settlements, retaining wall lateral pressures, floor support recommendations, and drainage considerations. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers hazard mitigation and geotechnical development recommendations. 1.2 Authorization Authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Troy Remneke on behalf of TNT, LLC. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated September 7, 2007. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of TNT, LLC and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. 2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property contains a single-family residence with a basement. The client intends to demolish the existing structure and replace it with five condominium units. Structural loads have yet to be determined, but are expected to be relatively light. We expect that wood -frame September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/ld - EE070610A5 - Projects1200706101EDWP Page I Packet Pg. 325 Substuface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Project and Site Conditions construction with slab -on -grade floors will be utilized. Basements are not anticipated with any of the planned condominium units. The site slopes gently to the south with less than a few feet of elevation differential across the property. The property is bordered to the north, east, and west by condominium and/or apartment buildings and to the south by 238' Street SW. Most of the native vegetation was previously removed and is now overgrown with ivy, blackberry brush, and grass. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included observing the excavation of an exploration pit in the front yard of the existing residence, Exploration of the site was limited by the existing occupied residence, pavement surfaces, and buried utilities. Because exploration was limited, a bearing soil evaluation is recommended early in the construction phase, as described in Section 8.0 of this report. The various types of sediments encountered during our excavation, as well as the depths where the characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration log presented in the Appendix. The depth indicated on the log where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types. Our exploration was approximately located in the field by referencing known site features, and the exploration pit location has been included on the attached "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the exploration pit completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the on -site exploration was completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, interpretation of subsurface conditions beyond our field exploration is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations beyond the field exploration may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3.1 Exploration Pit The exploration pit was excavated with a subcontracted excavator in September of 2007. The exploration pit permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pit were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. The exploration pit was backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/td - EE07061OA5 - Projects1200706101EDWP Page 2 Packet Pg. 326 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions on the site were inferred from the field exploration accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of applicable geologic literature. The following section presents detailed subsurface information organized from the upper (youngest) to the lower (oldest) sediment types. 4.1 Stratigraphy Fill Soil Fill soils (those not naturally placed) were encountered in exploration pit EP-1. The fill was approximately 11/2 feet in thickness and consisted of silty sand with gravel and asphalt debris. Fill thicknesses can vary greatly within short distances of the exploration. Fill and/or disturbed soil should be expected in the vicinity of the residence, driveway, walkways, landscaped areas on and adjacent to the residence, and along the right-of-ways. Fill thickness can vary randomly over short distances. Existing fill soil is not considered suitable for foundation support without overexcavation and recompaction under the observation of the geotechnical engineer. Lodgement Till Sediments encountered below the surficial fill layer generally consisted of medium dense to dense, gravelly silty sand. These sediments have been interpreted to consist of Vashon lodgement till. The Vashon lodgement till consists of sediments deposited by basal, debris - laden ice during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation approximately 12,500 to 15,000 years ago. Consolidation of the sediments by the massive weight of the overlying glacial ice has resulted in a compact soil possessing relatively high -strength, low -compressibility, and low -permeability characteristics. Vashon lodgement till should provide suitable foundation support and temporary cuts, as recommended in this report. 4.2 Geologic Mapping Review of the surficial geologic map titled Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohonzish and King Counties, Washington, Mackey Smith (1975), indicates that the area of the subject site is underlain by Vashon lodgement till (Qvt). Our interpretation of the sediments encountered at the subject site is in general agreement with the regional geologic map. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Mid - EE070610A5 - Projects1200706101EEMP Page 3 Packet Pg. 327 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.3 Hydrology As noted on the attached exploration log, ground water seepage was not observed within the exploration pit at the time of our exploration. However, perched ground water is typical at the contact between fill soils and the lodgement till and may be encountered during construction. Perched ground water develops where vertical infiltration is impeded by relatively low - permeability layers and lateral migration occurs. The quantity and duration of perched ground water flow is variable, depending on season, topography, and other factors. It should be noted that fluctuations in the level of the ground water may occur due to the time of year, variations in precipitation, changes in nearby land use, and other factors. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/1d — F_E070610A5 — Projects1200706101MWP Page 4 Packet Pg. 328 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations ..iUT 10 9 1 , e The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATION Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. The vast majority of these events are small and are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event; the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; and the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely every 25 to 40 years in the Puget Sound basin. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5.1 Surficial Ground Rupture The nearest known fault trace to the project site is the South Whidbey Island Fault Zone (SWIFZ). A recent study by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (Sherrod et al., 2005, Holocene Fault Scarps and Shallow Magnetic Anomalies Along the Southern Whidbey Island Fault Zone Near Woodinville, Washington, Open -File Report 2005-1136, March 2005) indicates that "strong" evidence of prehistoric earthquake activity has been observed along associated fault strands thought to be part of the SWIFZ. The study suggests as many as nine earthquake events along the SWIFZ may have occurred within the last 16,400 years. The recognition of this fault splay is relatively new, and data pertaining to it are limited, with the studies still ongoing. The recurrence interval of movement along this fault system is still unknown, although it is hypothesized to be in excess of 1,000 years, The USGS study maps the main SWIFZ approximately 4 miles to the northeast and one aeromagnetic lineament near the site within approximately 1 mile to the southwest. Due to the suspected long recurrence interval and lack of surface rupture expression, it is our opinion that the potential for damage to the proposed new condominiums by surficial ground rupture is considered to be low. No mitigations other than complying with 2006 International Building Code (IBC) seismic design recommendations are recommended. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/Id - EE0706I0W5 - Projects1200706101EEMP Page 5 Packet Pg. 329 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condonziniums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 5.2 Landslides According to the City of Edmonds Municipal Code, Title 23, Section 23.80.020(B), a landslide hazard area is defined to include: 1) areas of ancient or historic landsliding, 2) any area with a slope of 40 percent or steeper over a vertical relief of 10 feet or more, 3) potentially unstable areas as a result of rapid stream incision or stream bank erosion, and 4) areas located on alluvial fans. The slopes on the subject site are gentle, with less than 10 feet of vertical relief, and do not meet these criteria. In our opinion, no mitigations are required at this site. 5.3 Liquefaction The encountered stratigraphy has a low potential for liquefaction due to the lack of adverse ground water conditions and high strength of the glacially consolidated soils. No mitigation of liquefaction hazards at this site is recommended. 5.4 Ground Motion Structural design of the condominiums should follow 2006 International Building Code (IBC) standards using Site Class "C", as defined in Table 1615.1.1. The 2006 IBC seismic design parameters for short period (Ss) and ]-second period (Si) spectral acceleration values were determined by the latitude and longitude of the project site using the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project website(http://earthquake.usgs.goy/hazmaps/). The USGS website interpolated ground motions at the project site to be 1.20g and 0.42g for building periods of 0.2 and 1.0 seconds, respectively, with a 2 percent chance of exceedence in 50 years. Using the mapped spectral acceleration in conjunction with the identified site class, information presented in Tables 1615.1.2(1) and 1615.1.2(2) indicates site coefficients Fa = 1.0 and F, = 1.38 are recommended for use in site seismic design and analysis. 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIO According to the City of Edmonds Municipal Code, Title 23, Section 23.80.020(A), an erosion hazard area is: 1) one underlain by Alderwood soils with 15 to 25 percent slopes, Alderwood/Everett soils with 25 to 70 percent slopes, or Everett soils with 15 to 25 percent slopes; or 2) a site with slopes greater than 15 percent with interbedded permeable and impermeable soils and ground water seepage; or 3) areas that exhibit significant ground water seepage regardless of slope. According to the Soil Survey of Snohomish County (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA], 1983), the site is underlain by Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes. Therefore, the subject site does not meet the criteria for an erosion hazard area. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC, E•G11d - E•E07061OA5 - Project 02007061 MED WP Page 6 Packet Pg. 330 Substt►face Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations To reduce the potential for off -site sediment transport during construction, we would recommend the following: 1. Control of surface discharge during and following development should be performed in order to reduce the hazard of erosion. Care should be taken to ensure that surface runoff will not be directed onto the sloping areas. All devices used to collect surface discharge should be directed into a tightlined system that discharges away from slope areas. Uncontrolled discharge on the slope areas may promote erosion and slope movement. 2. A silt fence should be placed along the lower perimeter of the site prior to commencement of site development. 3. Construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year, and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. 4. Soils that are to be reused around the site should be stored in such a manner as to reduce erosion from the stockpile. Protective measures may include, but are not necessarily limited to, covering with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, or the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. 5. Areas stripped of natural vegetation during construction should be replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EGltd — EE070610A5 — Projects 1200706101EEIWP Page 7 Packet Pg. 331 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Repoli Edmonds Washington Design Recommendations 7.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the site is suitable for the proposed project provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed during construction. Based on the explorations, suitable foundation bearing soils appear to be present at conventional spread footing foundation depths, although some overexcavation of previously placed fill may be necessary. The medium dense to dense, lodgement till sediments should be suitable for temporary cuts along retaining wall areas, provided there is enough space to the property line to allow the temporary cut slope. 8.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of areas to be graded should include removal of all trees, brush, any demolition debris from existing structures, and any other deleterious material. If underground storage tanks (USTs) are discovered, they should be emptied, inerted, removed in accordance with Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) requirements, and the excavation examined by a certified UST assessor prior to backfilling the void with structural fill. All topsoil and the existing fill soil should be stripped down to the underlying, medium dense to very dense, lodgement till sediments. Since the density of the soil is variable, random soft pockets may exist, and the depth and extent of stripping can best be determined in the field by the geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. We recommend that pavement areas be proof -rolled with a loaded dump truck to identify any soft spots; soft areas should be overexcavated and backfilled with structural fill. Due to limited access for exploration of the site, a bearing soil evaluation by an Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) representative immediately after demolition is recommended. The bearing soil evaluation will help determine subsurface conditions in unexplored areas of the site. If necessary, recommendations in this report can be modified to address conditions observed at that time. 8.1 Temporary Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the existing fill soil or medium dense native soils can be planned at a maximum slope of 1.51-1:1V (Horizontal: Vertical). Temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the underlying, very dense lodgement till soils can be planned at a maximum September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/Id - EE070610A5 - Project .s1200706101EE1WP Page 8 Packet Pg. 332 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Design Recommendations slope of 3/4H:1V. If steeper temporary slopes are necessary, temporary excavation shoring may be required. Alternatively, obtaining slope easements from adjacent property owners may be an option. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 8.2 Site Disturbance The on -site soils contain fine-grained material that makes them moisture -sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. Consideration should be given to protecting access, staging, and foundation areas with an appropriate section of crushed rock. If crushed rock is considered for the access and staging areas, it should be underlain by engineering stabilization fabric to reduce the potential of fine-grained materials pumping up through the rock and turning the area to mud. The fabric will also aid in supporting construction equipment, thus reducing the amount of crushed rock required. We recommend that at least 10 inches of rock be placed over the fabric; however, due to the variable nature of the near -surface soils and differences in wheel loads, this thickness may have to be adjusted by the contractor in the field. 9.0 STRUCTURAL FILL We anticipate that structural fill will be necessary for backfill around portions of foundation areas and may be necessary to backfill overexcavated areas. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping has been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D 1557 as the standard. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG/Id - EE070610A5 - Projects1200706101EEMP Page 9 Packet Pg. 333 Sxbsulface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Design Recommendations engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free -draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of footings or pavement edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture -sensitive. Use of moisture -sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather conditions. The on -site soils generally contained significant amounts of silt and are considered moisture -sensitive. The on -site soils were at or above optimum moisture content during our field exploration program and may need moisture conditioning prior to being used as structural fill. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in - place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the owner in developing a suitable monitoring and testing frequency. 10.0 FOUNDATIONS Spread footings may be used for the support of structures when founded on the medium dense to dense, lodgement till soils or approved structural fill placed directly above the lodgement till. We recommend that an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for design purposes, including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. E•Glld - EE070610A.5 - Projecal -700706101EDWP Page 10 Packet Pg. 334 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds, Washington Design Recommendations be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. All footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above loose soil, existing fill soil, or organic soils. It should be noted that the area bound by lines extending downward at 1H:1V from any footing must not intersect another footing, or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. In addition, a 1.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded on medium dense to dense natural sediments or approved structural fill should be less than 1 inch. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Perimeter footing drains should be provided, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. 11.0 LATERAL WALL PRESSURES All backfill behind walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls that are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf. If parking/driveway areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform, horizontal backfill consisting of on -site sandy soils compacted to approximately 90 to 92 percent of ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the wall. Surcharges from adjacent footings, heavy construction equipment, or sloping ground must be added to the above values. Footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the wall. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade using imported, washed gravel against the walls. September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Mid - EE070610A5 - Projects1200706101EEMP Page 11 Packet Pg. 335 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condominiums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Design Recolrnnendations 11.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factor Retaining wall footings/keyways cast directly against undisturbed, dense soils in a trench may be designed for passive resistance against lateral translation using an equivalent fluid equal to 300 pcf. The passive equivalent fluid pressure diagram begins at the top of the footing; however, total lateral resistance should be summed only over the depth of the actual key (truncated triangular diagram). This value applies only to footings/keyways where concrete is placed directly against the trench sidewalls without the use of forms. If footings are placed on -grade and then backfilled, the top of the compacted backfill must be horizontal and extend outward from the footing for a minimum lateral distance equal to three times the height of the backfill before tapering down to grade. With backfill placed as discussed, footings may also be designed for passive resistance using an equivalent fluid equal to 250 pcf and the truncated pressure diagram discussed above. The passive resistance value includes a factor of safety equal to 3 in order to reduce the amount of movement necessary to generate passive resistance. The friction coefficient for footings cast directly on undisturbed, dense soils may be taken as 0.35. This is an allowable value and includes a safety factor of at least 1.5. Since it will be difficult to excavate these soils without disturbance, the soil under the footings must be recompacted to 95 percent of the above -mentioned standard for this value to apply. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT Slab -on -grade construction is expected for the proposed condominiums. Preparation for floor slabs should be as discussed in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. To control moisture migration from beneath the slab, the subgrade should be covered with at least 4 inches of washed pea gravel to act as a capillary break. A minimum 10-mil vapor retarder should then cover the pea gravel. If crawl space floors are used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Additional moisture protection details should be included as the owner and architect deem necessary. 13.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All perimeter footing and retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of a minimum, 4-inch-diameter, rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at the bottom of the footing at all locations, and the drain collectors should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the condominiums. Foundation walls should be lined with a minimum, 12-inch-thick, washed September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EGlld - EE07061045 - Projeas1200706101EE1WP Page 12 Packet Pg. 336 Substuface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, Edmonds Condotniniums and Geotechnical Engineering Report Edmonds Washington Design Recommendations gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of finish grade that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to foundations should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. 14.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING At the time of this report, site grading, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundations and retaining walls depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Everett, Washington Edwardo Garcia, P.E. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Appendix: Exploration Log Pb'- 3CE BLI-p EXPIRES ,3 o 3 Bruce L. Blyton, P.E. Principal Engineer September 20, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. EG11d - EE070610115 - Projects1200706101EEMP Page 13 Packet Pg. 337 ... . .... .... ........... .. zc aja- --------- - 7 CD 79 CN I W 2 1 x I,, rm 1 11" 1 d —J HIC-11-9 (J'p tui K I A LLI V' 14 AV D-= H l� !s' 4 --j V) C- 141 -W?,F L-L H —106 .... ...... . AV H LIZ: 16"13 Id Zt V, Id .72 kv -j I d (11-17, Ci T T I AV H— w Id Hiv.T F < C I C) z JP3 AWPA L09OLO 8I!S of P O < C) w 0) CD D W CD T- C) L-L W w d z 0 Of CL z 0 cn (L 0 0 z z — X z (1) 300 Z 0 Lu LU vi ri 4 0 WOO SPUOWPB L09OLI lacket Pg. 2 Z N O _O O w a, cD O O a O Q o UOz o w -� O LWi o H~ z z z 20 O CL o �X o ®' W 0. w c0 OL 126-40' O tom- a o NDO 0I I W 3 -z z ° - v� z Rip N . in d FhICE `aTA 14+00 a %' 116 7ti''; % —%—K x—X �x x — X k ---- -I—g --x— X dog N o c6 `n(`n o; o ° raj U O z�l 3 �p 5 �_ uJl �y 0 m i ��� X �- N C, J O uJ F` T 0 ,ri 0 O I aLAI is a O U' m ®pZ >� m a o , pl� w z I 3 u- - _° 3 V N_ ! x �39.3 z CD 0. 0. Z (A az cil 6J m i�r- O O i; 3a t� . N =% LLJ Z a In Co C3 000 Ci Lu w v� CoP_ � -� `} O O j 114 40 00� ' • " 3' _ Z J 3 i9.50' R.o(�KERY��+��%a�Y' o� rn'rn zo'n a.° aNOb i�� `s�i ,vdi 5TA 12 5Q c`��� vn�u u1 0 Ili o cd a, r- F- t TQi 0 InSD.Q ' UDO ¢NO uIO U U < iil tn d7 ON ❑ �, Q7 L. lC\j O C a. i O law orn V a w Q Q) C V 0 Cq a) ipo ild)C3 pue *I!S O490L01 apS opuop Spuowpg OL90L( Packet Pg. 3 E O 3 O d c 3 Cn LO Ln O O CD r O N Z J a y C N E t V r r Q O N ca r Co r C d E s u 2 a Packet Pg. 3 0771 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be i read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the n. time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are o a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Fill Loose, moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and asphalt debris. 1 2 Medium dense, moist, orange -brown, silty gravelly SAND. U) am 3 0 t 4 3 0 ----------------------------------------------------- Lodgement Till a, 5 Dense, moist, gray, gravelly silty SAND. 6 0 Cn LO LO 7 0 G o� 8 0 N Z J Cl- 9 c 10 0 E Bottom of exploration pit at depth 10 feet v 11 No water. No caving. is Q 12 -I 1 1 06 r L 0 13 0- aD 0Y 14 15 c m E 16 �a r r 17 Q 18 19 gl O N20 E Edmonds Condos m N Edmonds, WA a Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Project No. EE070610A g Logged by: EG 0 Approved by: a 9/12/07 a E- U Y Packet Pg. 341 1 USDA United States Department of Agriculture I V RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Snohomish County Area, Washington Sunde Townhomes Packet Pg. 342 N N 548664 47° 471" N i� 47° 46' 59" N 548664 548670 548676 548682 548688 3 Map Scale: 1:239 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. N Meters 0 3 7 14 21 Feet 0 10 20 40 60 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone ION WGS84 2 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 548670 548676 548682 548694 O N 47° 471" N M 47° 46' 59" N 548700 3 N Packet Pg. 343 a) '0 N O N w @ m N 7 U m o a� m 2 N U m r m m O a N m O N a 3 C 0 m > Oa Q ; 0 0 m o Co � m'o.C_ 'O O U Co U O m E In Q O E 0 -0 N ,� '_ r C C Q N Z Co C UCD _ O @ m O O M 0 m Q fOA O U m ma C C N L m Co C7 `� CL 7 o m a) 0 m O N O Y ) .: C a) m E m 3 N a) C� N Z.0 Z mo E m-o Q 3 T �01a)0 Q Cl) U) a 0Om ci 3 a 0 2 > UQ m n 3 c E U w n `� > �° a c -0 N 7 m a ) m O N E (n L pJ C_ N m m 0 � Q O N N aI Cl)m O a) Q m O > 4 o m m U m C m�tY 0 a) m w 3 U m Q 0 Q= ma aE LL m N m Q o a� —C> a O m C O 0 O m N m�0 C Z .0 0 0 EcD L �O to N N Q E�mO N E a� Z n o m a s O N 0 o N O a E o m m� m Co E c Taaio-� 0 m >>m U) a) a)CDtE (D �QaNic Q UO m w— E O (0 3 J> <n 0 Q C N (n N 0� 0 C m E Qo mY .0 zW m2Q°0C cm m a) p�0� w 01 w T j L (p N w m p •� C >, N 2 — O '0 N C 0.N C N Q O >, �U) N V m m 7 i 1 a C a) Q f0 O -0 > Q O-0 3 in O N E rn 0 T m a) yLa V 3@ 7 Co 7� Q .. 7 0 .N Qm a (m N E �o m Q) 0 -0 m �� o— m o C E o o a) m� a m °> � Q Qo m C> m 0 m o o `nv C m °7 C a ai m 0 a) 0 m m m `, p �. U m a) C � CL-2 0 0 Q 0> � a> o Eo � �� r a> rn o'Q�C L N m C y C O U W E_ N a) a E O >N 00 (n U m 0 Cl) _� V 2 =0 Q Ny s w 'p 3 (n (n 'p U) m p O t 0 m t E H U m > Q Co H O N H U t/) N i N cc a @ C LL U N - L Q `o) a)a m N N O Co a Q C 0 J N CL m E m N O 0 'o N L a 0 c O rn in Z > Co N L 0_ � O cn cn co � o 2 `o a) � 5 m m U 3 io 6 c L � r o 0 p Z LLI QO 4 C Cm v LU N a. a 0 C ° m� y 9 o w Co U) C G ; O a C 0 a y Q E 6 E N E E E a a 3 m o Q ° 0 ° Q O o m m m d 0 .. 3 a) .., (n a T= N O 0 a) 2 O0. O w � 0 Q N LL 3 cn O T N > > a 0 'o M y a) C tOJ N O U s > > 0 0 Y a) a M Q •0 U) •0 0 = O U)U) '0 m 0 N m U O (i0 (L6 U iD 0 Co N m C_ J J � � N O � a 0 (0 a' (n N () Co fn C (n m O m d a c ❑o❑I■� m 0 4 > +¢¢ 0 Q M M N d O O N C 7 Cn LO Ln O O C6 r O N Z J IL C N E m V Q r- c CD E m 4+ a Packet Pg. 3 47 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 5 6 Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0.0 0.2 12.2% 87.8% Totals for Area of Interest 0.3 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, 4 Packet Pg. 345 Custom Soil Resource Report onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 5 Packet Pg. 346 Custom Soil Resource Report Snohomish County Area, Washington 5—Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hz9 Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 to 220 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Alderwood and similar soils: 60 percent Urban land: 25 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Alderwood Setting Landform: Till plains Parent material: Basal till Typical profile H1 - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly ashy sandy loam H2 - 7 to 35 inches: very gravelly ashy sandy loam H3 - 35 to 60 inches: gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to densic material Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Forage suitability group: Limited Depth Soils (G002XN302WA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Mckenna Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Hydric soil rating: Yes Norma, undrained Percent of map unit: 5 percent 6 Packet Pg. 347 Custom Soil Resource Report Landform: Depressions Hydric soil rating: Yes Terric medisaprists, undrained Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Hydric soil rating: Yes 6—Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hzn Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 to 220 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Alderwood and similar soils: 60 percent Urban land: 25 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Alderwood Setting Landform: Till plains Parent material: Basal till Typical profile H1 - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly ashy sandy loam H2 - 7 to 35 inches: very gravelly ashy sandy loam H3 - 35 to 60 inches: gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to densic material Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Forage suitability group: Limited Depth Soils (G002XN302WA) Packet Pg. 348 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Norma, undrained Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Drainageways Hydric soil rating: Yes 8 Packet Pg. 349 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section VI, Page 1 Section VI — Other Permits Section VI Summary: Narrative The site will not require permits beyond those from the City of Edmonds. C CM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 350 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section VII, Page 1 Section VII — Bond Quantities, Declaration of Covenant, & Operation and Maintenance Manual Section VII Summarv: Narrative The Bond Quantity Worksheet is a standalone document that can also be submitted to the City of Edmonds separately from this document. A Declaration of Covenant is provided for the onsite BMPs proposed. The Operation and Maintenance Manual is a standalone document that will be given to the owner(s) following the construction of the project. The maintenance covenant contained herein is for the Sunde Townhomes building project. The contractor will be responsible for the maintenance and operation of all stormwater structures and BMPs requiring maintenance during construction and, after construction, responsibility will pass to the owner(s). Upon request by the City, it shall be made available for their inspection. It is generally expected that few to none of these defects will be present upon the yearly inspection of each facility. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 351 After recording return to: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Document Title(s) Declaration of Covenant - Private Stormwater Facility Reference Number(s) of Related Documents N/A Grantor(s) (Last, First and Middle Initial) Sunde, Thor Grantee(s) (Last, First and Middle Initial) City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated form; i.e., lot, plat or section,. township, range, quarter/quarter) NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27N, RANGE 4E, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number at the Time of Recording: 00463300700302 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. Packet Pg. 352 DECLARATION OF COVENANT Private Stormwater Facility WHEREAS, the undersigned Declarant(s) have installed a stormwater facility under Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 known as a "low impact development best management practices (LID BMP)" in lieu of other required more conventional stormwater systems, as selected below: ❑ Permeable Pavement ❑ Rain Garden / Bioretention Cell ❑ Infiltration Trench ❑ Drywell ❑ Gravelless Chamber ® Other Detention Pipe WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has allowed installation of the LID BMP, subject to the execution and recording of this Declaration of Covenant; NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARANT(S), being the owners of the real property ("the Property") located at the following address: in the City of Edmonds, Washington, and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, hereby covenants and agrees, on behalf of himself/herself/themselves/itself and his/her/their/its successors and assigns, as follows: Declarant(s) warrant that he/she/they are the owners of the property described on Exhibit A and have the authority to impose this covenant on the property and bind all future owners, successors, and assigns of the Declarant(s). The Declarant(s), future owners, successors, and assigns of the Declarant(s) shall be referred to collectively as "Owners." 2. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A agree that the property contains a stormwater management facility called a "LID BMP," which was installed to mitigate the stormwater quantity and quality impacts of some or all of the impervious or non-native pervious surfaces on the property. "Low impact development" means development conducted in a way that seeks to minimize or completely prevent alterations to the natural hydrology of the site. Low impact development includes site planning and design to reduce alterations of natural soil and vegetation cover, minimize impervious surfaces, and specific practices that help to replicate natural hydrology such as permeable pavements, green roofs, soil amendments, bioretention systems, and dispersion of runoff. 3. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A shall maintain the size, placement, and design of the LID BMP as depicted on the approved site plan, Exhibit B, and design details shall be maintained and may not be changed without written approval either from the Engineering Division of the City of Edmonds or through a future development permit from the City of Edmonds. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides shall not be used where LID BMP is located. . All costs of maintenance and repair shall be the sole responsibility of the Owners. Packet Pg. 353 4. The Owners of the property described on Exhibit A shall inspect LID BMPs annually for physical defects. After major storm events, the system shall also be checked to ensure that the overflow system is working properly. The Owners also shall maintain all LID BMP so it functions as designed on a year-round basis. 5. The City of Edmonds is hereby granted by the Owners the right, but not the obligation, to enter upon the property described on Exhibit A at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the private stormwater LID BMP facility. If, as the result of any such inspection the City of Edmonds determines that the LID BMP is in disrepair, requires maintenance or repair, or is otherwise not functioning as provided in the BMP site plan, the City Engineer or his designee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to order the Owners of the property described on Exhibit A to maintain or repair the same. 6. If the City of Edmonds determines that the LID BMP requires maintenance or repair pursuant to Section 5, the City of Edmonds shall provide notice to the Owners of the deadline within which such maintenance or repair must be completed. Said notice may further advise that, should the violator fail to perform required maintenance or make repairs within the established deadline, the work may be done by the city or a contractor designated by the City Engineer and the expense thereof shall be charged to the Owners. The City's officers, agents, employees, and contractors shall have the right, which is hereby granted by the Owners, to enter upon the property described on Exhibit A in order to perform such work. The Owners shall bear the cost of all work performed. 7. The Owners shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, officials, employees and agents from any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, judgments, attorneys' fees and/or costs of any kind whatsoever, arising out of or in any way resulting from the approval of the LID BMP, the installation and presence of the LID BMP, and the acts or omissions of the Owners, their officers, employees, contractors, and agents relating to the construction, operation and maintenance of the LID BMPs on the property, except for the City's intentional and willful tortious acts, and waive and release the City of Edmonds from any and all claims for damages and injunctive relief which the Owners may themselves have now or in the future, by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of said LID BMPs. 8. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon the Declarant(s), as the owner of the property described on Exhibit A, and on Declarant's successors and assigns as to such property. Packet Pg. 354 Dated: DECLARANT(S): (Signature) (Print Name) APPROVED: CITY OF EDMONDS (Signature) (Print Name) (Signature) (Title) (Print Name) State of Washington ) ss. County of Snohomish ) On this day personally appeared before me { Declarant(s) } to me known to be the individual, or individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN before me this day of , 201_. (Signature) (Name legibly printed or stamped) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Residing at: My commission expires Packet Pg. 355 Exhibit A FROM SURVEYOR: THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, HANHURY'S SOOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WAHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219685. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OD SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. FROM EDMONDS GIS: HANBURYS SOUND VIEW TRS BLK 007 D-02 - E 90FT OF S 126.40FT OF LOT 3 BLK 7 LESS TH PTN THOF DEEDED TO ST OF WA FOR 238TH ST SW PER AFN 2215678 AKA PAR B CITY OF EDM BLA LL-2006-129 REC AFN200612275209 Packet Pg. 356 Exhibit B \--H LLI 36"CON Ix \ ______________________________________ I, EXISTING BUILDING ''-_ X 12"CED .-2- DECK 8"CED , 2-12"C D 24`CE J N89.45'00"E 90.00' 7_C ____ ! \ 2-12" ED Z n 30"CE I \ � 24-C D /1 CATCH BASIN 1 X z TRENCH DRAIN o N DRIVEWAY 2-12"c D� r, + ` -- d"cE CONVEYANCE Ig PIPE a*T�_18"CED N I � / DETENTION PIPE W/ FLOW - Q4"CED CONTROL STRUCTURE 3a3 24..0 D LDG. �4"CED I �5 I I lALr ,� • I I "CED — _ � �, � 24"CED 0LLI M(2) 333 i N82'39'19"y 9 80 7' SD SID SD RI 33 R 4 3CON 260.00' / � I 3333 I \ 23�TH STRRR vI SW (HANF�U \ 1 1 , I N O t i O d i Cn In O O C6 O N Z old a r i t t) a r- O Q. d r Cn d z r, m 4m+ a Packet Pg. 357 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section VII, Page 2 Sunde Townhomes 8629 238t' St SW Edmonds, WA 98026 [a]".7_1V V [e] i, I_V 01 Ai /_l l i, 19 4 0 I_V L" Al /_1 lL NAM Date: December 2020 C GM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 358 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 December 14, 2020 Drainage Report Section VII, Page 3 Operation and Maintenance Manual This Operation and Maintenance Manual has been created for Sunde Townhomes, a 5-unit, 2-building, building project on a 0.25 acre lot. The proposed storm system consists of a detention pipe with flow control structure, trench drains, catch basins, roof/footing drains, and conveyance pipes. Included in this Operation and Maintenance Manual is an 11" x 17" grading and drainage plan sheet showing the location of the drainage system and components. Please note that this map is generated during the design phase and may not reflect all changes made in permitting and construction. CG Engineering may be contacted for an updated copy of this map once the as -built drawings are completed for the site. The contractor will be responsible for the maintenance and operation of all stormwater structures and BMPs requiring maintenance during construction and, after construction, responsibility will pass to the owner(s). An aerial image of the project area can be seen on the following page in Figure VII-1. Included in this manual are maintenance sheets taken from the 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington for the following facilities/activities: Catch Basins: Concrete structures with steel grates that collect stormwater runoff from the site and act as junctions for storm conveyance pipes. Control Structures: Control structures are catch basins or manholes with a restrictor device for controlling outflow from a facility to meet the desired performance. Closed Detention Systems (Tanks/Vaults): Detention tanks are underground storage facilities typically constructed with large diameter corrugated metal pipe. Vegetation Management: Landscaping can include grading, soil transfer, vegetation removal, pesticide and fertilizer applications, and watering. Stormwater contaminants include toxic organic compounds, heavy metals, oils, total suspended solids, coliform bacteria, fertilizers, and pesticides. Facilities shall be inspected for defects listed in the following facility sheets. Most maintenance tasks are generally reactionary to a defect being found, rather than a matter of constant upkeep. It is generally expected that few to none of these defects will be present upon the yearly inspection of each facility. The facility sheets list the potential conditions warranting maintenance and the expected result following any maintenance. Several engineer's notes for specific tasks are provided within the facility sheets. Unless otherwise noted on the facility sheets the maintenance tasks should be performed on an "as needed" basis: (a) when the described defect is visible to whomever performs the yearly inspection, or (b) should any defect become apparent between inspections. C 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 359 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section VII, Page 4 `x7w 7. �!v I� 4 A f Figure VII-1. Aerial image of project site (from City of Edmonds GIS Map). C � ENGINEERING 0 0 m c 3 LO LO O O O O N Z J 9,m. N C N E z U r r Q 06 r_ 0 a m r c m E r a 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 360 \ 1 II \ \ 0 y� _ j I40-1I- =NT E UNDER\\, pp 151 \\ L P 4 Y / �y �j RIM:419.BD\\ \\ (4..E):417.39 - _ 1E9U'F(6" S): 417.0 \ ROLLED CURB PER 6 COE STD TR-521 !� \\` �/ 6 N 4"TRAFFIC-RATED TRENCH DRAIN 7, 71 n -- RIM: 418.11 IE OUT: 415.7 0 1 42 Z41615 1 l EG: 4165, 415. 2 4 TRAFFIC-RATEI, \ TRENCH DRAIN 1'1 416 15 `0 IE CUT: 413S2 ` TOP: 415.67 y ICE: 414.75 -'EG: 415.25 82 UF- 8" DIP @ 18"CON 10.0% 12"QQN I4 TRAFFIC -RATED, TRENCH DRAIN 18"CQN - RIM: 414.0 IE i UT: 411.67 { 413.75 .24"CQN _ 413.0 \� _I TRAFFIC -RATED TRENCH DRAIN RIM: 413.40 18"CON IqCi7\411:07 O h TRAFFIC -RATED - T TRENCH DRAI"' 24"CQN V RIM: 412.36 \ IE OUT: 410.03 \ WALL \l``\' TRAFFIC T040&7 TENCH DRAIN �\ ' RIM412.17 T412.-5 \ IE OUT: 409.84 a mow? �\TYPE I B RIM: 412.0 / IE IN IF" N): 408.80 �I ---113E_0UT(6' E): 408.70 -`_�- 14LF`8"PVC@0.5"! YL 4 p._ - TIE FOOTING DRAIN \r INTO OUTFALL LINE OF DETENTION 11 54 NE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. EXISTING BUILDING 'I TOP: 422.5 OP: 424.1 TOP: 424.1 TOP: 424.5 TdFt: 421.8 OE: 421.8 TOE: 421.8 TOE: 421.8 EG: S22.5 PEG:424.1 EG 424.1 EG: 424.5 N89°45'00'E 0.00' 420.80 ---------- -- FOOTING AND \� J 4" AREA DRAIN RIM: 420.0 e2 ROOF DRAINS �. �\ IE OUT: 417.67 420.57 \ 421.15 SENTRY * 421.25 3 10.0% -1.1. GARAGE ENTRY 420.25 \ la GARAGE ENTRY 4\19.25 wa TOP: 417.7§ 417.56 TOE: 417.5 \ 41/`r 421.06 �G: .8 yyyJJJ /I ENTRY 421.25 MA1 {T417.3 \ nrKPaY - \ 1 / \\ GTOP 17.0 ARAGE ENTRY `TOE: 414.0 / W13./97 �/Ifr rY 435.13 EG: 417.0 ///�✓ /�f V I ///i 415ENT18 I�Wrllvl 3 GARAGE ENTRY 413.50 ,-- GARAGE ENTRY 413.50 r 4�2.50 r 414.83 ENTRY 415.18 12" CED 8"CED 2-12"C D 2-12" TED C,_T� Z �I; I � NI \\ q 24"C D I x T MAX HT ROCKERY TOP: 424.0 TOE: 421.8 EG: 424.0 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL 8" MIN FROM WOOD. ALLAROUND, WRAPPED IN SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, SLOPE AT 0.5% MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS AS SHOWNI - 6" DOWNSPOUTTIGHTLINE TO 3 GARAGE ENTRY 413.50 ,-- GARAGE ENTRY 413.50 r 4�2.50 r 414.83 ENTRY 415.18 12" CED 8"CED 2-12"C D 2-12" TED C,_T� Z �I; I � NI \\ q 24"C D I x T MAX HT ROCKERY TOP: 424.0 TOE: 421.8 EG: 424.0 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL 8" MIN FROM WOOD. ALLAROUND, WRAPPED IN SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, SLOPE AT 0.5% MIN. TURN DOWN PERFORATIONS AS SHOWNI - 6" DOWNSPOUTTIGHTLINE TO FINISHED GRADE i� CONVEYANCE SYSTEM @ 0.5% MIN. PLACE NEXTTO FOOTING DRAIN OR AS SHOWN ON _rF III GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN I III- (CONTRACTOR MAY LOCATE ON EITHER SIDE OF FOOTING DRAIN) 00 ° O. O 00000 ° 4 ° O° 0� -. LINE OF MAX EXCAVATION. 0 0 O0 a ,LINE IS OVEREXCAVATED, O 0 0O0 00 a �' REPLACE WITH LEAN MIX 0 0 CONCRETE �zi FOOTING 1 / 1 FOOTING AND ROOF DRAIN SECTION 2 SCALE: NTS STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" a qul z O O 12-12"C D� x O SHEAR GATE LIFT HANDLE 18"CE TOP OF RISER 18"CED NIE=409.90 q C O 4"CED OUTLET 3 12"CE �IE = 407.50 X. 12" 0 PVC FLOW CONTROL ASSEMBLY L D G . 24"C D 4"CED 1 I 1 1 t I 1 I 24l CED l & - � 24"CED 35Yp\�60" \ TYPE II FLOW 3 ~- O W \k \-------- ------- - - M 2 3\33 CONTROL STRICTURE N 82"3 9 RIM 412.02N 9„w 90.80' _ � IE IN (6 W):408.63 3 I PP W/L. - - UG- -------D -' _ A CESS RISER -- -- --__ �Y aL 4 -- - ° - % i - �Y--- SD -/- 5D CON TROLPMR CT-:WL / RIM 408. •• / / 11 N 76CM P 4C-+. / / II I I / I / I / / // RIMH IE ERIM 8" CO Q / IE E 12" PVC 405.60� IE W:8" CONC 405 38 8 I - 260.00' ; \ - I I I - \ N�0°45 00"E 6, 9.19 M 659.21 , P \ v \\ ; 1331 238TH STREE SWH_ANU FL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN \ 10 0 5 10 206 RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ 29/32"0 ORIFICE r 12"0 SHEAR GATE FINISHED GRADE PER PLAN STD LOCKING MH FRAME & BACKFILL, BEDDING COVER MARKED "DRAIN" &HAUNCHING PER ELEV=MATCH EXISTING MANUFACTURER GRADE 3.0'0 N-12 RISER DETENTION TANK TOP = 410.L, DMH STEPS @ 1.0' OC WELDOR BOLT TO DETENTION TANK f DETENTION TANK IE = 407.0� 49LF 3.0'0 N-12 DETENTION TANK NOTES: 1. RESTRICTOR ORIFICES TO BE SHOP DRILLED, SHARP EDGED. I._ :.'I FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH DETENTION TANK - SECTION 3 SCALE: NTS NOTES: 1. SOILS REPORT REPORT NUMBER: EE070610A PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DATED: JANUARY 8, 2008 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE COMPOST AMENDED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF BMP T5.131N ECOLOGY'S STORMWATER MANUAL VOLUME V, CHAPTER 5. 3. T SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE DRY UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.) AND SEWER, WATER, AND STORM, 5' FROM ANY CITY MAIN LINES. 4. A TYPE II CATCH BASIN IS REQUIRED WHENEVER RIM TO INVERT EXCEEDS 5'. 5. PRIOR TO PLACING ANY SURFACING MATERIAL ON THE ROADWAY, IT WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DENSITY TEST REPORTS CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. 6. NEW/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (INCLUDING ROW):7,818 SF -- ROOF (INCLUDES OVERHANGS): 5,243 SF -- WALKWAYS (NOT COVERED BY ROOF OVERHANGS): 360 SF -- DRIVEWAY (NOT COVERED BY ROOF OVERHANGS): 1,711 SF -- DRIVEWAY (ROW): 504 SF 7. DRIVEWAY SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 14%. 8. WORKED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2:1. GRADING QUANTITIES TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) - 480 CU YDS TOTAL EMBANKMENT(FILL) - 40 CU YDS TOTAL 520 CU YDS THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE. DO NOT USE FOR BIDDING, PAYMENT, OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES. PAVING LEGEND - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT/UTILITY SAWCUT NEW CONCRETE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DAIG BY! CIFY ENCINEEIMNO WM91011 C � ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 1 PHONE (425) 778-85 FAX (425) 778-553 FOR REPO USE OHL K07 FOR COG9SMW 1 U) a) O t i O H Z � � Om N ~ Ln O z O o a CD x w> N oX Z x J Y a 0 Q U) DESIGN: i DRAWN: CHECK: S JOB NO: 183 V DATE: XX/) _Q W 0 CL Na) 1.6 'w V E Q � Z Uf Q � � O Z Z = Q � M Q Z . W N Z C Z 04 :2 _ ccn DDo �W CD SHEET: C3.1 Packet Pg. 361 Applicable Operational BMPs: • Eliminate unpermitted wastewater discharges to storm sewer, ground water, or surface water. • Convey unpermitted discharges to a sanitary sewer if allowed by the local sewer authority, or to other approved treatment. • Obtain appropriate state and local permits for these discharges. Recommended Additional Operational BMPs: At commercial and industrial facilities, conduct a survey of wastewater discharge connections to storm drains and to surface water as follows: • Conduct a field survey of buildings, particularly older buildings, and other industrial areas to locate storm drains from buildings and paved surfaces. Note where these join the public storm drain(s). During non-stormwater conditions inspect each storm drain for non- stormwater discharges. Record the locations of all non-stormwater discharges. Include all permitted discharges. If useful, prepare a map of each area. Show on the map the known location of storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and permitted and unpermitted discharges. Aerial photos may be useful. Check records such as piping schematics to identify known side sewer connections and show these on the map. Consider using smoke, dye, or chemical analysis tests to detect connections between two conveyance systems (e.g., process water and stormwater). If desirable, conduct TV inspections of the storm drains and record the footage on videotape. • Compare the observed locations of connections with the information on the map and revise the map accordingly. Note suspect connections that are inconsistent with the field survey. Identify all connections to storm sewers or to surface water and take the actions specified above as applicable BMPs. S411 BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/ Vegetation Management Description of Pollutant Sources: Landscaping can include grading, soil transfer, vegetation removal, pesticide and fertilizer applications, and watering. Stormwater contaminants include toxic organic compounds, heavy metals, oils, total suspended solids, coliform bacteria, fertilizers, and pesticides. Lawn and vegetation management can include control of objectionable weeds, insects, mold, bacteria, and other pests with pesticides. Examples include weed control on golf course lawns, access roads, and utility corridors and during landscaping; sap stain and insect control on lumber and logs; rooftop moss removal; killing nuisance rodents; fungicide application to patio decks, and residential lawn/plant care. It is possible to Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-21 Packet Pg. 362 release toxic pesticides such as pentachlorophenol, carbamates, and organometallics to the environment by leaching and dripping from treated parts, container leaks, product misuse, and outside storage of pesticide contaminated materials and equipment. Poor management of the vegetation and poor application of pesticides or fertilizers can cause appreciable stormwater contamination. Pollutant Control Approach: Control of fertilizer and pesticide applications, soil erosion, and site debris to prevent contamination of stormwater. Develop and implement an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPM) and use pesticides only as a last resort. Carefully apply pesticides/ herbicides, in accordance with label instructions. Maintain appropriate vegetation, with proper fertilizer application where practicable, to control erosion and the discharge of stormwater pollutants. Where practicable grow plant species appropriate for the site, or adjust the soil properties of the subject site to grow desired plant species. Applicable Operational BMPs for Landscaping: • Install engineered soil/landscape systems to improve the infiltration and regulation of stormwater in landscaped areas. Do not dispose of collected vegetation into waterways or storm sewer systems. Recommended Additional Operational BMPs for Landscaping: • Conduct mulch -mowing whenever practicable • Dispose of grass clippings, leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation, by composting, if feasible. • Use mulch or other erosion control measures on soils exposed for more than one week during the dry season or two days during the rainy season. • Store and maintain appropriate oil and chemical spill cleanup materials in readily accessible locations when using oil or other chemicals. Ensure that employees are familiar with proper spill cleanup procedures. • Till fertilizers into the soil rather than dumping or broadcasting onto the surface. Determine the proper fertilizer application rate for the types of soil and vegetation encountered. • Till a topsoil mix or composted organic material into the soil to create a well -mixed transition layer that encourages deeper root systems and drought -resistant plants. • Use manual and/or mechanical methods of vegetation removal rather than applying herbicides, where practical. Volume IV - Source Control BMPs — December 2014 2-22 Packet Pg. 363 No. 3 — Closed Detention Systems (Tanks/Vaults) Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected Component When Maintenance is Performed Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a vent is Vents open and blocked at any point or the vent is damaged. functioning. Debris and Sediment Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% All sediment and of the diameter of the storage area for 1/2 debris removed from length of storage vault or any point depth storage area. exceeds 15% of diameter. (Example: 72-inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than 1/2 length of tank.) Joints Between Any openings or voids allowing material to All joint between Tank/Pipe Section be transported into facility. tank/pipe sections (Will require engineering analysis to are sealed. determine structural stability). Tank Pipe Bent Out Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape Tank/pipe repaired or of Shape more than 10% of its design shape. (Review replaced to design. required by engineer to determine structural stability). Vault Structure Cracks wider than 1/2-inch and any Vault replaced or Includes Cracks in evidence of soil particles entering the repaired to design Wall, Bottom, structure through the cracks, or specifications and is Damage to Frame maintenance/inspection personnel structurally sound. and/or Top Slab determines that the vault is not structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2-inch at the joint of any No cracks more than inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil 1/4-inch wide at the particles entering the vault through the walls. joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Manhole Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Manhole is closed. Any open manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens Not Working maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts with proper tools. into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread (may not apply to self-locking lids). Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove lid Cover can be Remove after applying normal lifting pressure. Intent removed and is to keep cover from sealing off access to reinstalled by one maintenance. maintenance person. Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design misalignment, not securely attached to standards. Allows structure wall, rust, or cracks. maintenance person safe access. Catch Basins See "Catch Basins" See "Catch Basins" (No. 5). See "Catch Basins" (No. 5) (No. 5). Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — December 2014 4-36 a� E 0 z c 3 0 H m c 3 LO LO 0 0 am 0 N Z J d c m E t U 0 r Q 06 r_ 0 a 0 r c m E t U M .r a Packet Pg. 364 No. 4 - Control Structure/Flow Restrictor Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected Component When Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Debris Material exceeds 25% of sump depth or 1 Control structure (Includes Sediment) foot below orifice plate. orifice is not blocked. All trash and debris removed. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to Structure securely manhole wall. attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure is not in upright position (allow up Structure in correct to 10% from plumb). position. Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight Connections to outlet and show signs of rust. pipe are water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes --other than designed holes --in the Structure has no structure. holes other than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gate moves up and maintenance person. down easily and is watertight. Chain/rod leading to gate is missing or Chain is in place and damaged. works as designed. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working properly due to Plate is in place and missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. works as designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation Plate is free of all blocking the plate. obstructions and works as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the Pipe is free of all potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. obstructions and works as designed. Manhole See "Closed See "Closed Detention Systems" (No. 3). See "Closed Detention Systems" Detention Systems" (No. 3). (No. 3). Catch Basin See "Catch Basins" See "Catch Basins" (No. 5). See "Catch Basins" (No. 5). (No. 5). Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — December 2014 4-37 a� E 0 z c 3 0 H m c 3 LO LO 0 0 am r 0 N z J d c m E t U 0 r Q 06 r_ 0 a m r c m E t U M .r r a Packet Pg. 365 No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed General Trash & Trash or debris which is located immediately No Trash or debris located Debris in front of the catch basin opening or is immediately in front of blocking inletting capacity of the basin by catch basin or on grate more than 10%. opening. Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 60 No trash or debris in the percent of the sump depth as measured from catch basin. the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of six inches clearance from the debris surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe Inlet and outlet pipes free blocking more than 1/3 of its height. of trash or debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could No dead animals or generate odors that could cause complaints vegetation present within or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). the catch basin. Sediment Sediment (in the basin) that exceeds 60 No sediment in the catch percent of the sump depth as measured from basin the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of 6 inches clearance from the sediment surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Structure Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Top slab is free of holes Damage to inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch and cracks. Frame and/or Top Slab (Intent is to make sure no material is running into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., Frame is sitting flush on separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame the riser rings or top slab from the top slab. Frame not securely and firmly attached. attached Fractures or Maintenance person judges that structure is Basin replaced or repaired Cracks in unsound. to design standards. Basin Walls/ Bottom Grout fillet has separated or cracked wider Pipe is regrouted and than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the secure at basin wall. joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ If failure of basin has created a safety, Basin replaced or repaired Misalignment function, or design problem. to design standards. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking more No vegetation blocking than 10% of the basin opening. opening to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints No vegetation or root that is more than six inches tall and less than growth present. six inches apart. Contamination See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). No pollution present. and Pollution Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — December 2014 4-38 a� E 0 t c 3 0 H m c 3 LO LO 0 0 a) r 0 N z J d c m E t U 0 Q 06 r- 0 a m r c m E t U M .r a Packet Pg. 366 No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed Catch Basin Cover Not in Cover is missing or only partially in place. Catch basin cover is Cover Place Any open catch basin requires maintenance. closed Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with Mechanism maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts proper tools. Not Working into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult One maintenance person cannot remove lid Cover can be removed by to Remove after applying normal lifting pressure. one maintenance person. (Intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance.) Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, not Ladder meets design Unsafe securely attached to basin wall, standards and allows misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. maintenance person safe access. Metal Grates Grate opening Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate opening meets (If Applicable) Unsafe design standards. Trash and Trash and debris that is blocking more than Grate free of trash and Debris 20% of grate surface inletting capacity. debris. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of the Grate is in place and Missing. grate. meets design standards. No. 6 — Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Racks) Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Results Expected When Components Needed Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Trash or debris that is plugging more Barrier cleared to design flow Debris than 20% of the openings in the barrier. capacity. Metal Damaged/ Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 Bars in place with no bends more Missing inches. than 3/4 inch. Bars. Bars are missing or entire barrier Bars in place according to design. missing. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% Barrier replaced or repaired to deterioration to any part of barrier. design standards. Inlet/Outlet Debris barrier missing or not attached to Barrier firmly attached to pipe Pipe pipe Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — December 2014 4-39 Packet Pg. 367 Sunde Townhomes - CG #18322.20 Drainage Report December 14, 2020 Section VII, Page 5 SAMPLE ACTIVITY LOG DATE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PERFORMED RESULTS / NOTES C CM 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING ph.425.778.8500 1 f.425.778.5536 www.cgengine Packet Pg. 368 IIIIIIII IIII IIII IIIII IIIII IIII 202012160719 After Recording Return To: de Vrieze I Carney PLLC 3909 California Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98116 RECORDING COVER SHEET REVOCATION Rec: $134.50 12/16/2020 12:02 PM 1 of 32 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WA Electronically Recorded Document: Revocation of Boundary Line Agreement filed in Snohomish County on November 20, 2012. Rerecord to correct recording (reference) number and date of recording. (> Grantor: Andrea Strome, Paul Svenkerud, Danette Willis, Frank Thong, Raoul Comaduran, Michael O'Neill, Ted Bergstrom, Bryan Bedson, Kiley Kemp, John Whaley, Sarah Whaley, Sabin Arditty, Allison Arditty Grantee: TNT LLC Reference No.: 201211205001 (BLA); 202012110326 (erroneous recording) Legal Description: With recording of this document, the below legal descriptions shall govern. GRANTOR PROPERTIES :UNITS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, AND J, OF THE FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM, A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701050630 AND BY SURVEY MAP AND PLANS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701055202 AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH., STATE OF WASHINGTON. GRANTEE PROPERTY: THE EAST 90 .FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANDBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219685. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LL2006-129, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 200612275209, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTOM). Tax Parcel Numbers: 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302 ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 369 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA 202012110326 After Recording Return To: de Vricze I Carney PLLC 3909 California Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98116 RECORDING COVER SHEET REVOCATION Rec: S133.50 12/11/2020 12:22 PM I of 3l SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WA Electronically Recorded Document: Revocation of BLA 20 Recording to revoke BLA filed in Snohomish County on November A 2012.( Grantor: Andrea Strome, Paul Svenkerud, Danette Willis, Frank Thong, Raoul Comaduran, Michael O'Neill, Ted Bergstrom, Bryan Bedson, Kiley Kemp, John Whaley, Sarah Whaley, Sabin Arditty, Allison Arditty Grantee: TNT LLC (-4 Reference No.:-20+27t�� 2 o I ZI 1 Z050 b I Legal Descriptions: With recording of this document, the below legal descriptions shall govern. GRANTOR PROPERTIES :UNITS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, AND J, OF THE FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM, A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701050630 AND BY SURVEY MAP AND PLANS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701055202 AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. GRANTEE PROPERTY: THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANDBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219685. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LL2006-129, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 200612275209, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.). Impacted Tax Parcel Numbers: 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400,01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800, 01062700000900, 01062700001.000 and 00463300700302 Packet Pg. 370 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County-, WA When recorded, return to: Thor Sunde 24225 85"' Avenue SW Woodinville, WA 98072 REVOCATION OF BLA AND CONFIRMATION OF PRIOR EASEMENT PURPOSE This document is to acknowledge and confirm that the Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA), approved by the City of Edmonds but not completed thrpugh the recording of deeds, and recorded in Snohomish County under )recording number26t2'ttD, impacting properties at 8629 238°1 Street SW in Edmonds, WA, and 8705 238th Street SW, in Edmonds, WA, by agreement of the undersigned impacted property owners, is hereby revoked and rendered void. PARTIES AND PROPERTIES BOTH BELOW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ARE FROM BEFORE THE 2012 BLA. Parcel A: Owner of Parcel A is the Fir Grove Condominium Owners Associations Legal description OF Parcel A: UNITS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, AND J, OF THE FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM, A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701050630 AND BY SURVEY MAP AND PLANS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701055202 AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Tax Parcel Numbers: 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01.062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900,01062700001000. Property commonly known as 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026. Parcel B: Owner of Parcel B is TNT LLC. Legal description of Parcel B: THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANDBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219685. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LL2006-129, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 200612275209, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.). Tax Parcel Number: 00463300700302 Property commonly known as 8629 2381" Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026. Packet Pg. 371 Pag ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REvoCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 0 106270000 1000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 a —/-I 1_4 e , &1? Z: 1 2 :4�Z v A -Andrea Strome Date B-Paul Svenkerud Date C-Danette Willis Date Date E-Raoul Comaduran Date F-Michael O'Neill Date xxxxxxxxx G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx H-Bryan Bedson Date H-Kiley Kemp Date I -John Whaley Date I -Sarah Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 2381h Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 372 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA Was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 20121 1205001, to comply With and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. "Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries fo r title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN PULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the casement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation ol'the 2012 BLA, the 2007 casement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effeet. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part ol'the 2012 13oundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 20121 1205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100. 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400. 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302. hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 2381h Street SW, Edmonds. WA 98026'—___`) A -Andrea Strome Date 3-Paul Svenkerud Date - C-Danelte Wilfis Date D-Frank Thong Date E-Raoul Comaduran Date F-Michael O'Neill Date _ xxxxxxxxx G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx LI-Bryan Bedson Date H-Kiley Kemp4� Date I -John Whaley Date I -Sarah Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty J-Allison Ardilty ~—� Date Owner of 8629 23811' Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARRiS ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGLS Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 373 ord Date:12/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01.062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome CDe s Date � �D��te E-Raoul Comaduran Date G-Ted Bergstrom Date H-Bryan Bedson Date I -John Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty B-Paul Svenkerud Date D-Frank Thong Date F-Michael O'Neill Date xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx H-Kiley Kemp Date I -Sarah Whaley Date J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 2381' Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Packet Pg. 374 ord Datc:12/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS 1N FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REvoCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 0 106270000 1000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date B-Paul Svenkerutv�t�� d ate 1 �/as Date -n- V 134: ;--- C-Danette Willis Date (os�v1 ne. II Gr*ee�1pr Jd Date F-Michael O'Neill E-Raoul Comaduran Date xxxxxxxxx G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx H-Kiley Kemp H-Bryan Bedson Date Date I -Sarah Whaley I -John Whaley Date Date J-Allison Arditty J-Sabin Arditty Date Owner of 8629 2381h Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 375 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND v rFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the casement in the 2012 BLA replaces the casement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 casement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCA1-10N OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adiustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date B-Paul Svcnkerud Date C-Danette Willis Date Vz//, //rl zo E-Raoul Comaduran Date D-Frank Thong F-Michacl O'Neill Date Date G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx H-Bryan Bcdson Date H-Kiley Kemp Date I -John Whaley Date 1-Sarah Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 238111 Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sundc NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 376 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMEN'r RILMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the casement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 0 106270000 1000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Stromc Date B-Paul Svenkerud Date C-Danette Willis Date D-Fr r k ong '/ Date E-Raoul Comaduran Date F- ch cl O'Neill Date xxxxxxxxx G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxsxxxxx H-Kiley Kemp H-Bryan Bedson Date Date I -Sarah Whaley 1-John Whaley Date Date J-Allison Arditty J-Sabin Arditty Date Owner of 8629 230 Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 7 1 Packet Pg. 377 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Ad ustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date C-Danette Willis Date E-Raoul Comaduran Date p i1 �i_ zz G-Ted Bergs om Date H-Bryan Bedson Date I -John Whaley J-Sabin Arditty Date B-Paul Svenkerud Date D-Frank Thong Date F-Michael O'Neill Date H-Kiley Kemp Date I -Sarah Whaley Date J-Allison Arditty Date rl-imr-r of SZ6')Q 72Rth Ctrppt- CUV PAmnnAc UUA QRn76 Packet Pg. 378 ord Datc:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAv RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201111205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 0 1062700000500, 01062700000600, 01062700000700, 01062700000800, 01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds. WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date B-Paul Svenkerud Date C-Danette Willis Date D-Frank Thong Date E-Raoul Comadura❑ Date F-Michael O'Neill Date xxxxxxxxx G-Ted Bergstrom Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1Z K-K900f n.zow i-I • an , Date H-Kiley Kemp Date I -John Whaley Date I -Sarah Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 238`h Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 379 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMATNS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adiustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date C-Danette Willis Date }-Raoul Comaduran Date G-Ted Bergstrom Date II- iyan Bed o �. Date as I-J m Whale Date J-Sabin Arditty B-Paul Svenkerud Date Date D-Frank Thong Date F-Michael O'Neill xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date / ()% ) 6 Zi�ZUw H-Kiley Kemp s •-� - arah Whaley D• J-Allison At -ditty Owner of 8629 238a' Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 TNT LLC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Date Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 380 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAV RECITALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 20121 1205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved parcel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA By signature below, the current owners of all properties that were part of the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 20121 1205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 0 106270000 1000 and 00463300700302, hereby revoke the 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment and render it null and void. Owners of 8705 238th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 A -Andrea Strome Date C-Danette Willis Date E-Raou1 Comaduran Date G-Ted Bergstrom Date H-Bryan Bedson Date I -John Whaley- Date abin rditty B-Paul Svenkerud Date D-Frank Thong Date F-Michael O'Neill Date xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I -I -Kiley Kemp Date I Sari l�i Whaley Date J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 238°i Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 381 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA RECrrALS In 2012, a BLA was recorded in Snohomish County, recording number 201211205001, to comply with and signify the conclusion of the City's BLA regulatory process. The BLA was not completed in 2012, however, as no transfer deeds were recorded. Thus, the approved panel boundaries for regulatory purposes do not correspond with the parcel boundaries for title purposes. The impacted parties no longer wish to complete the BLA. 2007 EASEMENT REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT In the 2012 BLA, Easement Note on page 3/3 states the easement in the 2012 BLA replaces the easement recorded under AFN 200701050551. With the revocation of the 2012 BLA, the 2007 easement recorded under AFN 200701050551, remains in full force and effect. REVOCATION OF BLA attire below. the current owners of all nrnnerNes*at were Dart of the 2012 B Line Adiustment, recorded in Snohomish Country under recording number 201211205001, impacting parcels 01062700000100, 01062700000200, 01062700000300, 01062700000400, 01062700000500,01062700000600,01062700000700,01062700000800,01062700000900, 01062700001000 and 00463300700302, hereby re-vpkg t_ a 2012 Boundary Line Adjustment t111dder it null and v id Owners of 8705 238th Street SW. Edmonds, WA P-Paul ts�ZA-Andrea Strome Date venkerud Dat C-Danette Willis Date E-Raoul Comaduran Date G-Ted Bergstrom Date H-Bryan Bedson Date Wolin Whaley Date J-Sabin Arditty D-Frank Thong Date F-Michael O'Neill Date li-Kiley Kemp Date 1-Sarah Whaley Date J-Allison Arditty Date Owner of 8629 2381h Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 /2'v L a TN'f CC Date by Manager Thor Sunde NOTARIES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 382 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA State of Washington ) ss: County of Yl I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Thor Sunde is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the Revocation and acknowledged it as a Manager of TNT LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date: I21 oN ?,OU Notary I Printed j B ROY residing RY PUBLIC LSTATE WASHINGTON My App Expims April 21, 2021 WwvWvjj0u and 1(�r the State of Washington, expires: State of Washington ) J )ss: a County of 1VI ) c aD I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Andrea Strome is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in t ent. Q Nov �01 2©20 `o Dated: N ; �wCL �jNA H6S,7�� N aryQ and fo the State of Washin on .. ••.•• p �� Printed name: U01 n h� P-D& 01 v;moo M �t •.•0 residing at: 12� (p nt f of iulKf a My appointment expires: Z j .. NOTARY R' : .• ,!1 U �%�JI .�- N ; do PUBLIC V t j '� .`Oryl fUC .• 00 �'F*1No 2.rj `W' S\-\ State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Paul Svenkerud is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington pr;v%+PA name - Packet Pg. 383 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA� State of Washington ) ) County of 55; ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Thor Sunde is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath statedXat he Was authorized to execute the Revocation and acknowledged it as a Manager ofTNf LLC to I the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. / Date: ! Notary Public in and for the Sate of Washington, Printed name % residing at__ , \sty Appointment cxpir_,es: --_ State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory F7dcnee that Andrea Strome is the person who appeared before tile, and said person acknowledged t10at she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act I'or the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County of 5-M-6 j A Isk- ) 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Paul Sveil kerud is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his Tree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ;���� 620$N.aryff Public in and for the fState of t lungton Printed name: ' L J,�Gt My N appointment expires: a U . 2 p 1' Z N 1Z8315 7i�<<i6; = /II AID Page 3 of 7 1 Packet Pg. 384 ord Date:1 2/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WAv State of Washington ) j� )ss: County of �n ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Danette Willis is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ti ed in the instrument. Not y P blic in and for the State of Washington C L BENDtKSEN Printed name: C C P�' Ie� S ci Notary Public residing at: e ,��, State of Washington My appointment expires: to t 3 . 3 J a �� Commission # 13799 My Comm. Expires Jun.13, 2024 State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Frank Thong is the person who,d°ppeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 7 Dated: Notary Public in and for the Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: r State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory�vidence that Raoul Comaduran is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: D...Anf7 Packet Pg. 385 ord Datc:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Danette Willis is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: State of Washington Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: )ss: County of ) sc to-V1ne, Cre-e.Jt elcl I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument., _ Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washi Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: ��� 1noI r s a-�G ChMe�k State of Washington )ss: County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Raoul Comaduran is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that lie signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: Packet Pg. 386 residing at: ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA California All -Purpose Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Orange On 11/05/20 before me, Laron Baroldi , notary public, personally appeared ***Roseanne Greenfield*** , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. d WITNESS my hand and official seal. LARON BAROLO{ J �"" ` Notary Public - California z + o Orange County Commission # 2233176 My Comm. Expires Mar 4, 2022 Signature (Seal) Optional Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal of this reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Revocation Of Bla Document Date: November 5, 2020 # of Pages: 3 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Packet Pg. 387 ord Date: 12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA CALIFORNIA GENERAL DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY THE POWERS YOU GRANT BELOW ARE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF YOU BECOME DISABLED OR INCOMPETENT CAUTION: A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENT. BY SIGNING THE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, YOU ARE AUTHORIZING ANOTHER PERSON TO ACT FOR YOU, THE PRINCIPAL. BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, YOU SHOULD KNOW THESE IMPORTANT FACTS: YOUR AGENT (ATTORNEY -IN -FACT) HAS NO DUTY TO ACT UNLESS YOU AND YOUR AGENT AGREE OTHERWISE IN WRITING. THIS DOCUMENT GIVES YOUR AGENT THE POWERS TO MANAGE, DISPOSE OF, SELL, AND CONVEY YOUR REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND TO USE YOUR PROPERTY AS SECURITY IF YOUR AGENT BORROWS MONEY ON YOUR BEHALF. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT GIVE YOUR AGENT THE POWER TO ACCEPT OR RECEIVE ANY OF YOUR PROPERTY, IN TRUST OR OTHERWISE, AS A GIFT, UNLESS YOU SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZE THE AGENT TO ACCEPT OR RECEIVE A GIFT. YOUR AGENT WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE REASONABLE PAYMENT FOR SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY UNLESS YOU PROVIDE OTHERWISE IN THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. THE POWERS YOU GIVE YOUR AGENT WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST FOR YOUR ENTIRE LIFETIME, UNLESS YOU STATE THAT THE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL LAST FOR A SHORTER PERIOD OF TIME OR UNLESS YOU OTHERWISE TERMINATE THE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY. THE POWERS YOU GIVE YOUR AGENT IN THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST EVEN IF YOU CAN NO LONGER MAKE YOUR OWN DECISIONS RESPECTING THE MANAGEMENT OF YOUR PROPERTY. YOU CAN AMEND OR CHANGE THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY ONLY BY EXECUTING A NEW DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY OR BY EXECUTING AN AMENDMENT THROUGH THE SAME FORMALITIES AS AN ORIGINAL. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REVOKE OR TERMINATE THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AT ANY TIME, SO LONG AS YOU ARE COMPETENT. THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY MUST BE DATED AND MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC OR SIGNED BY TWO WITNESSES. IF IT IS SIGNED BY TWO WITNESSES, THEY MUST WITNESS EITHER (1) THE SIGNING OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY OR (2) THE PRINCIPAL'S SIGNING OR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HIS OR HER SIGNATURE. A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY THAT MAY AFFECT REAL PROPERTY SHOULD BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC SO THAT IT MAY EASILY BE RECORDED. YOU SHOULD READ THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY CAREFULLY. WHEN EFFECTIVE, THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL GIVE YOUR AGENT THE RIGHT TO DEAL WITH PROPERTY THAT YOU NOW HAVE OR MIGHT ACQUIRE IN THE FUTURE. THE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, OR ANY PROVISION OF IT, THEN YOU SHOULD OBTAIN THE ASSISTANCE OF AN ATTORNEY OR OTHER QUALIFIED PERSON. NOTICE TO PERSON ACCEPTING THE APPOINTMENT AS ATTORNEY -IN -FACT BY ACTING OR AGREEING TO ACT AS THE AGENT (ATTORNEY -IN -FACT) UNDER THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY YOU ASSUME THE FIDUCIARY AND OTHER LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AN AGENT. THESE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE: 1. THE LEGAL DUTY TO ACT SOLELY IN THE INTEREST OF THE PRINCIPAL AND TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. 2. THE LEGAL DUTY TO KEEP THE PRINCIPAL'S PROPERTY SEPARATE AND DISTINCT Packet Pg. 388 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA FROM ANY OTHER PROPERTY OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY YOU. YOU MAY NOT TRANSFER THE PRINCIPAL'S PROPERTY TO YOURSELF WITHOUT FULL AND ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION OR ACCEPT A GIFT OF THE PRINCIPAL'S PROPERTY UNLESS THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES YOU TO TRANSFER PROPERTY TO YOURSELF OR ACCEPT A GIFT OF THE PRINCIPAL'S PROPERTY. IF YOU TRANSFER THE PRINCIPAL'S PROPERTY TO YOURSELF WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION IN THE POWER OF ATTORNEY, YOU MAY BE PROSECUTED FOR FRAUD AND/OR EMBEZZLEMENT. IF THE PRINCIPAL IS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER AT THE TIME THAT THE PROPERTY IS TRANSFERRED TO YOU WITHOUT AUTHORITY, YOU MAY ALSO BE PROSECUTED FOR ELDER ABUSE UNDER PENAL CODE SECTION 368. IN ADDITION TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, YOU MAY ALSO BE SUED IN CIVIL COURT. I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING NOTICE AND I UNDERSTAND THE LEGAL AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES THAT I ASSUME BY ACTING OR AGREEING TO ACT AS THE AGENT (ATTORNEY -IN -FACT) UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. DATE: 7/24/2014 {Si NATURE OF AGENT) Roseanne Greenfield (PRINT NAME OF AGENT) CALIFORNIA GENERAL DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY THE POWERS YOU GRANT BELOW ARE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF YOU BECOME DISABLED OR INCOMPETENT NOTICE: THE POWERS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT ARE BROAD AND SWEEPING, THEY ARE EXPLAINED IN THE UNIFORM STATUTORY FORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE POWERS, OBTAIN COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANYONE TO MAKE MEDICAL AND OTHER HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS FOR YOU. YOU MAY REVOKE THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IF YOU LATER WISH TO DO SO. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF YOU BECOME DISABLED, INCAPACITATED, OR INCOMPETENT. I Francis Weng-Fai THONG of 8921 La Paloma Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 [insert your name and address] appoint Roseanne GREENFIELD of the same address [insert the name and address of the person appointed] as my Agent (attorney -in -fact) to act for me in any lawful way with respect to the following initialed subjects: TO GRANT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING POWERS, INITIAL THE LINE IN FRONT OF (N) AND IGNORE THE LINES IN FRONT OF THE OTHER POWERS. TO GRANT ONE OR MORE, BUT FEWER THAN ALL, OF THE FOLLOWING POWERS, INITIAL THE LINE IN FRONT OF EACH POWER YOU ARE GRANTING. Packet Pg. 389 Francis Weng-Fai Thong Durable Power of Attorney Page 2/7 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA benefit plan); select and change payment options for the principal under any retirement plan; make rollover contributions from any retirement plan to other retirement plans or individual retirement accounts; exercise all investment powers available under any type of self -directed retirement plan; and, in general, exercise all powers with respect to retirement plans and retirement plan account balances which the principal could if present and under no disability. (M) Tax matters. To prepare, to make elections, to execute and to file all tax, social security, unemployment insurance, and informational returns required by the laws of the United States, or of any state or subdivision thereof, or of any foreign government; to prepare, to execute, and to file all other papers and instruments which the Agent shall think to be desirable or necessary for safeguarding of me against excess or illegal taxation or against penalties imposed for claimed violation of any law or other governmental regulation; and to pay, to compromise, or to contest or to apply for refunds in connection with any taxes or assessments for which I am or may be liable. (N) ALL OF THE POWERS LISTED ABOVE, YOU NEED NOT INITIAL ANY OTHER LINES IF YOU INITIAL LINE (N). SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ON THE FOLLOWING LINES YOU MAY GIVE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS LIMITING OR EXTENDING THE POWERS GRANTED TO YOUR AGENT. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND WILL CONTINUE UNTIL IT IS REVOKED. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS A GENERAL DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SHALL CONTINUE TO BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF I BECOME DISABLED, INCAPACITATED, OR INCOMPETENT. (YOUR AGENT WILL HAVE AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY OTHER PERSONS AS NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE AGENT TO PROPERLY EXERCISE THE POWERS GRANTED IN THIS FORM, BUT YOUR AGENT WILL HAVE TO MAKE ALL DISCRETIONARY DECISIONS. IF YOU WANT TO GIVE YOUR AGENT THE RIGHT TO DELEGATE DISCRETIONARY DECISION - MAKING POWERS TO OTHERS, YOU SHOULD KEEP THE NEXT SENTENCE, OTHERWISE IT SHOULD BE STRICKEN.) Authority to Delegate. My Agent shall have the right by written instrument to delegate any or all of the foregoing powers involving discretionary decision -making to any person or persons whom my Agent may select, but such delegation may be amended or revoked by any agent (including Packet Pg. 390 ord Date: 12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA benefit plan); select and change payment options for the principal under any retirement plan; make rollover contributions from any retirement plan to other retirement plans or individual retirement accounts; exercise all investment powers available under any type of self -directed retirement plan; and, in general, exercise all powers with respect to retirement plans and retirement plan account balances which the principal could if present and under no disability. (M) Tax matters. To prepare, to make elections, to execute and to file all tax, social security, unemployment insurance, and informational retums required by the laws of the United States, or of any state or subdivision thereof, or of any foreign government; to prepare, to execute, and to file all other papers and instruments which the Agent shall think to be desirable or necessary for safeguarding of me against excess or illegal taxation or against penalties imposed for claimed violation of any law or other governmental regulation; and to pay, to compromise, or to contest or to apply for refunds in connection with any taxes or assessments for which I am cr may be liable. (N) ALL OF THE POWERS LISTED ABOVE. YOU NEED NOT INITIAL ANY OTHER L! E !F YOU INITIAL LINE (N). SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ON THE FOLLOWING LINES YOU MAY GIVE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS LIMITING OR EXTENDING THE POWERS GRANTED TO YOUR AGENT. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND WILL CONTINUE UNTIL IT IS REVOKED. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS A GENERAL DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SHALL CONTINUE TO BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF I BECOME DISABLED, INCAPACITATED, OR INCOMPETENT. (YOUR AGENT WILL HAVE AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY OTHER PERSONS AS NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE AGENT TO PROPERLY EXERCISE THE POWERS GRANTED IN THIS FORM, BUT YOUR AGENT WILL HAVE TO MAKE ALL DISCRETIONARY DECISIONS. IF YOU WANT TO GIVE YOUR AGENT THE RIGHT TO DELEGATE DISCRETIONARY DECISION - MAKING POWERS TO OTHERS, YOU SHOULD KEEP THE NEXT SENTENCE, OTHERWISE IT SHOULD BE STRICKEN.) Authority to Delegate. My Agent shall have the right by written instrument to delegate any or all of the foregoing powers involving discretionary decision -making to any person or persons whom my Agent may select, but such delegation may be amended or revoked by any agent (including Francis Weng-Fai Thong Durable Power of Attorney Page 5/7 Packet Pg. 391 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA any successor) named by me who is acting under this power of attorney at the time of reference. (YOUR AGENT WILL BE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL REASONABLE EXPENSES INCURRED IN ACTING UNDER THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. STRIKE OUT THE NEXT SENTENCE IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR AGENT TO ALSO BE ENTITLED TO REASONABLE COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AS AGENT.) Right to Compensation. My Agent shall be entitled to reasonable compensation for services rendered as agent under this power of attorney. (IF YOU WISH TO NAME SUCCESSOR AGENTS, INSERT THE NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF SUCH SUCCESSOR(S) IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH.) Successor Agent. If any Agent named by me shall die, become incompetent, resign or refuse to accept the office of Agent, I name the following (each to act alone and successively, in the order named) as successor(s) to such Agent: Maya Erika GREENFIELD-THONG Choice of Law. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WITHOUT REGARD FOR CONFLICTS OF LAWS PRINCIPLES. IT WAS EXECUTED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS INTENDED TO BE VALID 1N ALL JURISDICTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL FOREIGN NATIONS. I am fully informed as to all the contents of this form and understand the full import of this grant of powers to my Agent. I agree that any third party who receives a copy of this document may act under it. Revocation of the power of attorney is not effective as to a third party until the third parry learns of the revocation. I agree to indemnify the third party for any claims that arise against the third party because of reliance on this power of attorney. Signed this 24 day of June , 2014 [Your Signature] 547-77-9986, CA DL# C3656781 [Your Social Security Number] CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Yuvta This document was acknowledged before me on A^-9- ILA. "{ [Date] by [name of principal]. Francis Weng-Fai Thong Durable Power of Attorney Page 6/7 Packet Pg. 392 ord Date:12/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WA [Notary Seal, if any]: EDARClLLA JR. Commission # 2024357 z Notary Public - California i Orange County M Comm. Expires Ma 12.201 q'�l (Signatu a of N a ial Officer) Notary Public for the State of California My commission expires: Mon k2, 201-I ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AGENT BY ACCEPTING OR ACTING UNDER THE APPOINTMENT, THE AGENT ASSUMES THE FIDUCIARY AND OTHER LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AN AGENT. Roseanne GREENFIELD [Typed or Printed Name of Agent] [Si nature of Agent] PREPARATION STATEMENT This document was prepared by the following individual: Francis Weng-Fai THONG [Typed or Printed Name] [Signature] Packet Pg. 393 Francis Weng-Fai Thong Durable Power of Attorney Paqe 7/7 ord Date: 12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WA State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Danette Willis is t}te perso who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and ackno� edged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the St fe of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires/ State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory,evidence that Frank Thom is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged thW he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and put�poses mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County of 1':�l Vtr ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Raoul Comaduran is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowicdged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: It - 18 -Z QZ 6 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: _rn (C b) LY --D 1, t) A residing at: t'e / tz r.rn e+ My appointment expires: 0 b Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 394 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAv Slate of Washington ) )ss: County of 'alcj I ccnify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Michael O'Neill is the person who appeared before me. and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary net for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: P(. (q �,lz, Notary Public in and �for �the State of Washington Printed name: f_.i/rf`7V'l._ 0�j�'�ty"'f residing at:,54,k,tk 1) My appointment expires: Slate of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ted Bergstrom is die person who appeared before me. and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary net for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: Slate of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brvan Bedson is the person who appeared before me. and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instntment. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 395 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAv State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mention Dated: Il is the person who appeared and acknowledged it to be his in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ted Bergstrom is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: •. 0gto� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name:''/�- G'Kcy , � �® 0 residing at: ,t ftB UG My appointment expires: c-1 w. State of Washington County of I certify that I know or have satisfacto evidence that Bryan Bedson is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and urposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Packet Pg. 396 ord Date: 12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAV State of Washington ) )ss: County ofayt>DMiS� ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Kiley Kemp is the person who appeared before ace me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free �voluntary act for the uses and purposes mcg&ned in jhe instrument. iQ fried: 20aO Jvid a tl�s,% L.IC.?io. the State Printed name: L V-�r residing at:IQ—AyV'byU My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County of } Db ( \ k f ata'3 Slate, &491ZRQ I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that John Whaley is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington )ss: County of ) j/ I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Sarah Whaley is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printedname: residing at: Wappointment expires: Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 397 ord Date:12/16/202012:02 PM Snohomish County, WAv State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Michael O'Neill is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ; Dated: Notary Public in and for the5tate of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ted Bcr strom is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that lie signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at:,, My appointment expires: State of Washington ) )ss: County oftY1�.S\A ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Bryan Bedson is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes Toned in the i strument. Dated: �� I"1 �709LO Notary Public ' nd fo tate of Washington Printed name: residing at:Q��s ��. #1o3go'� My appointment expires: 0b (rr f a oa3 } I IC 10. iA a; UI,rrr�.`���f, Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 398 ord Date:12/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WA State of Washington ) )ss: County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evident that Kiley Kemp is the person who appeared before me, and said pet -son acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her fi•ee and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument, Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: residing at: My appointment expires: State of Washington ) � )ss: County of _LId ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John Whaley is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in �the nstrue t Dated: ) O /ao2 m Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: Ve L-4 S / ' st e-c- residing at: ga-t'j e- My appointment expires: ), O1r}b 40?-v State of Washington ) )ss: County of r AD ) KEITH BUEHNER Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires Oct 26, 2020 I certify (hat I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sarah Whaley is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in die instrument. Dated: 1 D b-1 Idpa-c> Notary Public in an for the S e of Washington Printed name:_ ez!-hOveGl.rf: residing at: Se C-I.We My appointment expires; KEITH BUEHNER Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires Oct 26, 2020 a� E 0 t c O l- tV C 7 LO 0 0 en 0 N Z J d N C O t 0 r Q 0a O a m R N c d E t U w Q Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 399 ord Date:12/16/2020 12:02 PM Snohomish County, WA State of Washington ) )ss: County 0(''Mr'zk7 ) 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabin Arditty is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:��+Id'20'�-� w 5g °scz4 PUBOC No 2011105' . •O AD �j •� 23-20ZaC�� State of Washington County of �?nchUjolst/) I Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed name: J,{_iaXh Wax - residing at: Eamood5 My appointment expires:b6/231-�O-?'q )ss: 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Allison Arditty is the person who appeared before n1e, and said person acknowledged that she signed this Revocation and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: it I L ( ` 1'0� 10 IV : 0,0TA,q)'m': 0- No g20111057 .- �0 �R;r •INAS��ta Notary Public in and I'or the State of Washington Printed name: -r✓I V! .i�t Gt4df' residing at: Et4,mor),L5 My appointment expires: 06/23/2VZq Packet Pg. 400 After recording return to TNT LLC 1136 Vista PI Edmonds, WA 98020 - 4111i1 iiBl lilll lilil lllll lilil 114111i1i1141i1 illil llil liil NO EXC i S E TAX REQUIRED 2000�51 1, 28 m gg35 00 PG5 JA SNOH0MI5 EM T�, WRSHINGTON N 0 5 2001 �� 808 OANTINI, Snohonush Laonty Treasurei By BOB l?ANTlNI DECL T0N OF EASEMENT Reference Number(s) of Document assigne*,,Wased: Not Applicable Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name an i Is: TNT, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Corporation, Fir Grove Condominium Owners Association, a Washington O Incorporated non-profit Association 0 Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials T, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability oration Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e, lot, block, plat or section, township, range): Additional legal on page 1 & 2 of document(s) Portion of Lot 3, Block 7, Hanbury's Sound View Tracts, V 7, Pg 20 Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): 00463300700301 and 00463300700302 This Declaration of Easement is made by TNT, LLC, and Fir Grove Condominium Owners Association RECITALS A TNT, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company and Fir Grove Condominium Owners Association, a Washington Incorporated non-profit Association, owns the following descnbed parcels which shall be subject to this Declaration Lot 3, Block 7 Hanbury's Sound View Tracts, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 7 of Plats Page 20, records of Snohomish County Washington, Declaration of Easement -1- Packet Pg. 401 Except the East 90 feet of the South 126 40 feet thereof, And except that portion thereof deeded to the State of Washington for 236`h Street SW by instrument recorded under recording number 2215678 (Hereinafter referred to as Parcel A) Situate in the Co6fof Snohomish, State of Washington The East 90 feet o outh 126 40 feet of Lot 3, Block 7, Hanbury's Sound View Tracts, accordin Plat thereof recorded in Volume 7 of Plats Page 20, records of Snohomish , Washington, Except that portion dee �E' o*the State of Washington under Auditor's file number 2219685 (Hereinafter referred to as Par Situate in the County of Snohomis,6te of Washington B. There is an existing roadway acro%pr A, which serves both Parcel A and will serve Parcel B, and TNT LLC and Fir Cmum Owners Association wishes to grant an easement to Parcel B and subject boies to maintenance covenants NOW, THEREFORE, TNT LLC, a Washmgto ited Liability Company and Fir Grove Condominium Owners Association, a Wash Incorporated non-profit Association, subjects Parcel A to the following covenant , easements, restrictions and provisions- 1 TNT LLC and Fir Grove Condominium Owners Association declares, grants, establishes and creates an easement for ingress, egress, and utilities across and below the following described area The South 113 40 feet of the West 40 00' of Parcel A, City of Edmonds Boundary Line adjustment NO LL-2006-129, recorded under Snohomish County Auditor's file NO. 200612275209 Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington 2. The easements and covenants herein shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors of the respective parties and shall run with the land 3. Declarants for both Parcel A and B described in Section A above hereby covenant, and each owner of any parcel or lot by acceptance of a deed, or contract therefore, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any such deed or other conveyance, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay its share of the cost of maintaining the easement. Declaration of Easement -2- Packet Pg. 402 Each such cost, together with such interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the owner of such property at the time when the common expense was incurred 4 The comijw maintenance expense shall be allocated equally between Parcel A and B If addApA lots or parcels arc created by subdividing either Parcel A or B, then the common mai rice expense shall be allocated in equal shares among all existing parcels or lots sery the Easement. 5 Any common expe igation, which is not paid within 15 days after the ue date incurred, shall be delinqnt. a assessment is not paid within 30 days after the due date, the assessment shall bea *est at the rate of 12% per annum Any owner may bring an action at law against theW personally obligated to pay the same for the sum due. Interest, costs and reasonable to y's fees of any such action shall be added to the amount due No owner may ai or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use ZAe easement 6 Notwithstanding anything to theme' rary above, if a lot owner or a guest or invitee of a lot owner, including without I. n a contractor or other person or entity employed by a lot owner, causes damage to asement area beyond reasonable wear and tear or installs utilities, then the lot owner repair the easement area at the sole expense of the lot owner In the event the lot own s to repair the easement area within (45) days after written request from the other ow then the other lot owners may repair the easement area and the cost thereof shall beco a an assessment within (30) days after written demand for payment and failure of payment Each such assessment shall also be the personal obligation of the person or partnership or entity who is/was the owner of such property at the time when the assessment fell due This easement shall be effective upon recording 8 In any dispute or legal proceeding (whether arbitration or court proceeding) concerning the terms of this easement the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees and costs in any court or arbitration proceeding initiated to enforce any provision of this instrument Venue for any such action shall be Snohomish County 9 This Declaration of Easement is intended to create an easement in favor of Parcel B The intent of the grantors is that the casements be created and not merged due to common ownership of the parcels Date r� o enneke, Member TNT, LLC Declaration of Easement -3- Packet Pg. 403 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OFSM rn ta)h ) On this day persSpplly appeared before me Troy Renneke, as a Member of the TNT, LLC, a Washin 00-Limited Liability Company who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowled that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpo wierem mentioned GIVEN under my hand�Akicial seal this c,7 day of bnomuv, 2007 expires €j 1G1 (ia Declaration of Easement 4- Packet Pg. 404 CItY OIL W)MONOG 8WOUNDA RY L INN ADJUbTMVNT PILX NO. LL-2 -121 -11KAIAL I Pt ION - PARC I L A 001Dmm in BLA LOT 3 BLOCK 7, HAN5URY5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING, TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLAT5 PAGE 20 RECORDS OF 5NOHOM15H COUNTY WA5H1 NGTON, EXCEPT THE EAST 70 FEET OF THE 5OUTH 120 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE 5TATE OF WA5HINQTON FOR 238TH STREET 5W BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2215670 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF 5NOHOM15H 5TATE OF WA5HINGTON com "C iRIPT'ION P C0-. 0 SLA THE EAST 70 FEET OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANBURY'5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDINQ TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS PAQE 20, RECORDS OF 5NOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON UNDER AUDITOR-5 FILE NUMBER 2219605 5ITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF 5NOHOM15H, STATE 0- WA5HINQTON LPL 09GO R I Pwr I ON - 1®A RCUL A APTIM BLA LOT 3, BLOCK 7 HANBURYS SOUND VIEW TRACT5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS PAGE ?0, RECORD5 OF 5NOHOM15H COUNTY WA5HINGTON, EXCEPT THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 12640 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WA5HINQTON FOR 238TH 5TREET 5W BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDINQ NUMBER 2215670 r' ti r •-6 ' r - f ... d. 'ti r KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNOER5IGNED OWNER(5) OF THE LAND HEREIN DE5CRIMD DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 5017 040 AND •� ... DECLARE TH15 ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME AND THAT SAID . • r • r ADJUSTMENT IDS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(5) 1N WITNF-55 WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS r•• ' i Al•• NT, LL , A W 5HINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY by I ITS W 'ti r •- Aftidoo r z STATE OF WA5HINQTON) •. r � ) 55 - • 1 - L - - - , - COUNTY OF 5NOHOM15H) ' • ' I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT 7hbr � 15 TW-PER5014'-WHO APPEARED_ BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/5HE 51QNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH 5T/4T•E6-fRAT. HE/SHE WA5-AUTF;0RIZED'T-0 EXE.011t THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT A5 THE 2 MAC Y' - F TNT LLC, A' WA�HINQTON 'LlMlft LIABILITY -6OMPANY TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF 5UCH PARTY FOR THE U5�,5_ AND PUAPOSE5 MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT DATED r r ' •ti �eil N � SIGNATURE fSSIOA( _ ' ; r '. •_ � ': . .' ,�.. (PRINT NAME) NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND' FOR THE STATE Or WA5HINQTDN p(fet/C RESIDING AT t `V t V • ' • • .... f 7 14-20 09 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES , �—i ' 1 .- ' -. �WASHIN • . '1 r F1Lfl . FdR RECORt� 8Y bAVlO T C�ARDNER . TH15 MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR THIS1DAY of �t-� • 2006 A D AT UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE t RNUTE5 45T u 0'400K A M AND RECORDED IN VOLUME REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE . _ OF •5URVEYS',ONPAGE_, RECORDS OF REQUEST OF TROY RENNEKE TH15 � DAY T_ ' 5NOHOM15H .:COUNTY, WA5HINQTON OF J fF 2006 COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY AUDITOR REGI5TERr-LAND 5U VEYOR L 5 NO 35975 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF 5NOHOM15H STATE OF WA5HINQTON Wrj"L D1C#1 I1" I ON - fDAJ R=—I D 0"M IDLA THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126 40 f EET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANBURY'5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PACE 20, RECORDS OF 5NOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HINQTON EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE 5TATE. OF WA5HINQTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2219605 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WA5HINQTON DATE 12, - V -D:- pl f b ages PISS 00 -I'AX P29_, , EXAMINED AND APPROVED TH15 a 1&l DAY OF. DEC. ,2006 �>""';LANNINQ, DIVISION NO I RF-VI51ON (ALPHA 5UBDIV1510N PRO'S INC) Land Surveyors AND LAND Uft PACILITATOIRs Tole (42F) 262-1"4 4121-A 1vorgroom WaW ■vorett, WA U203 BY I CHECKED I DATE LINE ADMINT 12/04/06 for LNW ?Nt,II . IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE 5W 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T 27 N, R 4 E W.M C I ry, op 1 OF 2 ASPI 5NOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HINQTON 206115 DWG N a) 0 t c 3 0 H m c LO LO 0 0 T 0 N Z J a Ch c am E t U fC Q 0 Q m R U) c a� t a Packet Pg. 405 WUSM, !Y LINE vA=A*?rWT PILK 1O. LL-20"-1211 LOT 3, BLOCK 2 HANSURYS SOUND VIEW TRACTS VOL 7, PG 20 FOUND 1" I P NO 2'_ N89°58'44'E 130 00 9 7' 9 7' 20' P U 0 EASEMENT AFN 8110140147 x i I'a 25 3' I I I ( I I 466 FOUND 'L5A *9091' NO 1'XWO 2' 2 FOUND RESAR . •■ X�O 24 8 8 6' 5CALE 9"=30r_ . O FOUND IRON PIPE OR BAR AND CAP (RBC) A5 NOTED '' '• .' - ® FOUND MONUMENT A5 NOTED BSBL BUILDING SET BACK LIVE •' .~ ,- 8 6' EOP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT - ti. FOC - FACE OF CURB .... �j�RG•�L PLNT - PLANTER - $ M - MEASURED •' AREA BEFORE BLA 32,016 5F ''-" '% AREA AFTER BLA 29 254 5F $ '■ '■ '•■ '� 578' v' 4 r' - • •' N89°45:00'E•'BETWEER',FOUf9Q MONUfvNT5' 45.5HOWN ALONG 230TH 5T 5W (HANSURY DRIVE) • :PER PLR.T5 AI�Q 5URV_ .5 kl fERENW BELOW ' $WYK. � ra _ • .' - .' P - HANBi7RY5 50VNO \ iE b 'fRACT5 VOL 7 PG. 20 R05 - RECORD •,OF 5URVEY; BY LOVELL-5AUERLAND & A550C , INC VOL. 7 PG 145 u Iv� ry• LA -, •L'.AR J ADDITION -VOL 21, PG 51 x o ... '• W500!f RIGHI"'OV WAY AND LIMITED ACCE55 MAP FOR 5 R 104 FROM 236TH 5T 5W TO •'ti MtRIOIAN AVE, SHEET 2 OF 4, DATED MARCH 12, 1970 8 5' • ... •' VILL9 ROYALE, A CONOOMMUM, VOL 40, PG5 41-46 EXI5TING BUILOIVG x '' - •' r ' ••'� RECORD OF 5URVEY VOL. 8, PG. 117 • E RECORD OF 5URVEY, AFN 200211135004 tt DECK r .o .... . 18 3 AOJU5TED LOT LIVE 'ti 10 0 24 7 Nb9"45'00'E 90 00' x • "" ' •'ti •' •, .....omwy NOT" x x—x—xx 195: x ' • 52r-. ,. _ - ti EQUIPMENT LEICA i" TOTAL 5TATION METHOD FIELD TRAVER5E x 1 r� �' .I •� THE CL05URE5 OF TH15 FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED DURK TH15 5URVEY MEET I LOT, LIME •'ti i OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM CL05URe 5TANDARD5 5TATE0 IN WAC 332-130-090 70' ' •',EX TIC T NLroaft x 5FO, ' •' I) x r.-• 00463300700301 AND 00463300700302 I o �L. .� 171> � r� x 'DECK . . 1S 4' '' ■ o' I SHP 120' x $ I EX - 1'' - - • x� i®A#1tC�L-'d � � BLoG . AREA BEFORE .&A 8 073 5F .x .6REA• AFT�2.-BLA 10,936 5F I 34 6' SEWER EA5EMENT - -- — — . --: 40,35 '- . �ti. x AFN 1988182 x FOUND R%!Y I 9080 $ R/C 'L5A-i9891'. ••1 , ; N82.39yq — "� IFOUND "L5A *9091' NO1' 1.0 III11 "w 13115 E01---------- L _�'�' � ' _I a• 4 FEI�C x—x---x--- oI_• � W E O O N ' •■ .. .... I + S10EWALK V FOUND CONC MON IN '} CASE W/ BRA55 TACK 26919'-hl 269 21'-RO5 ti CW FILED_>RRMD T G' -TH15 MAUTE5K5NOHOMVC,TON COMITY AUDITOR E� I,Q I I W O � o I t FOUND CONC MON IN W/ INVERTED NAIL 130 00'-LA FOUND CONC MON IN �5 260 00' - - - - 129 91-M - CA5E W/ INVERTED NAIL - N09045'00'E 65919'-M 659 21'-P 238TH $TIQEET IbUJ (WANDUIRI' DMNI) -f i� >E Irp "V8*vo0ft'1b CAMP R T AP CORRECTLY REPRE5ENT5 A 5U MADE BY ME OR _ 2006 A D , AT UNDER M CTiOW IN CONFORM WITH THE AND RECORDED IN VOLUME REQUIREMENT5 OF URVE ECORDIVG ACT AT THE RECORD5 OF REQUE5T OF TROY R E G DAY DEPUTY AUDITOR OF p ' " - �nzx REGISTERED LAND 5URVEYOR L5 NO 35975 No ' REVISION (ALPHA 5USDIVI5ION PRO'5 INC) ,.'�I Lind rv�syor� AND EXPI .5 3/30/2008 LAND U" IIIAGILITA rom DATE Tole (425) 232-10" 4121-A lvorgr~ Waij lvorstt, WA W203 6Y I CHECKED I DATE L TMIW 12/04/06 for HP TNT, LLD. op IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE 5W 1/4 OF SECTION 31 T 27 N, R 4 E, W.M CITY o 2 of 2 ASPI * 5NOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON 206115 DWG Packet Pg. 406 _ _.GIT`t' OF-EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT LIES4L ZESCRgPTION - PARCEL A BEFORE BLA VNWW A. 8, C. D, `zr F,-L H, I AND J, FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM, A RESIOENTIAL CONOONINiL M, ACCORDING r •'TO THE OECL ks?AT16H RCCOROEO tR4DER 4ECORDNG 14Lx48E.R Z007MO50M AND N SURVEY MAP AND PLANS OEQ VjMR RECORDr< NUMBER ZD0701055202. ANO ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO. RECORDS - DF Sflp pFyS}J-C' WA5HMTO; TOC>CTHERFWITH LMICID COI," CAENT3. -- STTVATL' L INC C(6T.Y.OF-SHOHDMISH, 514'rE. OF-WASHBTGTON.- LEGAL DESCRIPT1Q.N - PAIRCdL a.Bl=^ 1 •BLA THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 126.40'-r-ELT OF LOT 3r BCOCK 7, HANDURY% SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCOROM TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VANKE 7 OF PLATS,-PAGE2Q, FAG0e".OF SNOHOMI5H COUNTY, WA5HMTON, • EXCEPT THAT FORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WA5KMT0N Uj10ER AUORO&-.XiLgNIi XR 22I9695. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LING AD.lU57MEN I' NO. LL2006-Y 9, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S F62 NUMBER 200612275209, RECOR05 OF 5NOHOMISH 6OUNrY, WASFMTON.)„ SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. STATE OF WA5HNGTON - -_ . �. . TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATE AND COUNTY TAXES HERETOFORE LFVIEO AGAINST THL-4ROPE TY•06%RnfEQ 4iEREN, ACC6RpR4G TD - - THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF OFFICE, HAVE EH FUMY LAM AND D15CHARGEO, UOGiG CjdA2j' JAXC5. opal o r� a ldr,�y 749. ArA+iax��L0, 0/0Qf R7 �, or�G9'Id�rOa� alai � dIdlo�74W&*''Z fJIdG�7 B B : �. p TREASURER HOMISH COUNTY TR SU OHOMlSH COUNTY 4016 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARCEL A AFTER BLA UNITS. A. k C, 0, E. F. G. H. I AND J, FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM, A RE51DENTTAL CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200701050630 AND N SURVEY MAP AND PLANS RECOROEO UNDER RECOROM NUMBER 200701055202, AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON: TOGETHER WITH LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT5; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 126.50 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANBURY`5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED N VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH AN INGRE55, EGRE55, AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE `BEST 40.00 FEET OF TINE SOUTH 126.40 FEET OF SAID LOT 3. SITUATE N THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. STATE OF WA5HINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARCEL B AFTER BLA THE 50VTH 126.40 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, HANBURY'5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE FLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF 5NONOMI54 COUNTY, WASHWQTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON UNDER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 2219685; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMI5H, 5TATE OF WA5HN('GTON 21 DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDER51GNE0 OWNER(5) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THERCON" --- PURSUANT TO RCW 5817.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS E tflTi{fiF1E' FR�Er" CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DF51RC5 OF THE OWNER(5). MAD-- N WRNE55AAWHERREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND 5EAL5. -- II �� U - •• - ... j�1�LG A i�'A�SI'NGT�LPYTLO ilABa.i-iY COFWAHY JEFF ddd"7ffROML� I •Y RU •...... - ___ __ BY: Tlzoy QIF— w)EIGE fT9c ANDREA STROME .KRfS FiA M, MCCOOL _- WEND FA] T.wt� ^FRAH ��T�AS�H�R SEPARATE ESTATE 5HEN1(.�PA_UL50N - ••-••— - e05r--AFIH[ GR[4NF'IELj7. 7RU;3EE J 5_k PAUL50N _ /] 5LIF3�71ILffR _ AF# RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED F R RECORD BY HARLEY C. PAWLEY THIS DAY OF PDV6AL8LY, 2012--A.0. ATZL MINUTES PAST II O'CLOCK,&M. AND RECORDED N VOLUME OF 5URVEY5 ON PAGE RECORDS OF �/11 SNOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HINGTON. CA6LVA1 tk1Elil>EL COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY A 'iTOR JAVN IL RUFF ` '. 5 SEPARATE ESTATE V MATTHEW Pf5CADOR, AS IRS SEPARATE ESTATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TH15 MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION N CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RI;CORDIN; ACT AT THE REQUEST OF TROY RENNEKE THIS 19 �J7 DAY OF r 4Anr 2D i! . REGI5TERE6 4M SURVEYOR 1 1-5. NO: -38014 CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVAL .rXAMWEQ AM APPROVED, THIS DAY OF 4 'C 201L .EDMONDS fAHINNG Im51m . NO. REN510N ' ~ -BY CHECKED DATE 15OUNDARY -L1NE A•I Ji�STMENT_ 09/00/00 (ALPHA SUBDIVISION PRO'S, INC) -- for - - Land Surveyors LNw AND t1�Ft;-LL LAND USE FACILITATOR$ --N_THL NE 1/4.eFiHE 5W 1/4 or' - - 'SECTION Si; T. Z7 N. R. 4 R.M. - CITY.OF_6Q1 ONDS-, 1 Tsls:(436) 262-1584 ASPI 1`11 4121-A livrrresn WagIGverOtt, WA W203 5NDHOMlbm-6OLWY. ylA31TWGTON ' ZDd17ypy� Packet Pg. 407 _ ACI�f�IOIUL,�DCsMENtS STATE O�.MA$HCdGiOH t) STATE OF WASHINGTON } _{tll/i'IFY 0[-Stt01i0M15H } 55. COUNTY OF 5NOHOMI5H 55' ),&'!Ci THAT [XNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACTORY tMENCE THAT _-i7`i L""L+V�+t+__„_ 15 THE PCR50H WHO APPEARED ItFORE Me. AND 1 CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACTOPY GVIOGNCe THAT JAMES B. & 5HERYL L PAUL50K HUSBAND & WIFE, ARE THE PERSONS WHO APPEARED BEFORE -'SAID PERSON ;(MOWL60Ge0 THAT Ht/514E 51GN0 THIS NOTR(1MENT. ON OATH STATED THAT He/51iL WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NSTtWeNT Me, AND SAm PERSONS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED TH15 NSTRUMeNT AND ACKNOWLEDGED, IT TO BE THEIR FRFJ: AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AN4 AND &ouvoweDGEO it A!,FHe AAEiqM OF TNT. LC, A WASHNGTON UHTED LABILITY COMPANY, TO BE THE. FREE AhiO VOLUNTARY PURPOSES MENTIONED N THE INSTRUMENT. -• ACf OF SUC}L•kRrY FogR TI�G USES AND, PURPOSES MWTato IN THE NSTRUMEAT. DATED-rt-1t1 _DATED:• GL 92 �--- 5rAATURE: '' "F- • Y L. Osr. • 5IGNATUep- C� �- A�-• Os-r ER (PRINT MAMEk ��' _+ e11Z14.A s."D w�¢p.N r �RNT NAM:+ 44 n', Fro NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON +' U NOTARY A NOTARY Re5IDNG AT Mt1¢!S++IV_6 y NOTAR4 PUBLIC IN AHD, FOR THE_STATG OF XJASHlJGTON P „y UBLIC ReSI01NG AT •_"9Yt171LIF _.- - �� PUBLIC MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 4-21-13 FjiQ<2r'2a13 �Q= 441.2013 MY APPONTMENT EXPIRES - tr= 1 -F. x-4A5Yi�N • _ - QF.g3Y� STATE OF WA5HINGTON ) STATE OF WA5HINGTON) - COUNTY OF SNOHOMIyi) 55 •`••. COUNTY OF 5NOHOMI5H: ) • - - - • • _ I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EViIXNCE THAT LESLIE CtRFFIiH & JEFFREY TRe1TT MILLER. WIFE & HUSBAND. ARE THt PERSONS WHO APPdARIO 1 CERTIFY THAT I KNOW 4R eAV•SATISFACTORY ChXNCE THAT JEFF SjANORCI :ITt llt, W5BANO & WFG, ARE THE PraSON5 WHO APPEARED CCI'O�t Me, SORE Mr. AND SAID PER5045 ACKNOWLCO(ZO THAT THEY 5IGtlED THIS INSTRUMENT AM ACKNOWUOGGD IT TO Be THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THe AND, SAID PERSONS ALxNpWL COC¢'O THAT .iHC1r 51C'!E0 TH1� .>rtSlRUytlii •A�I.ACi7�1QM •nTn I#• TO Be THEIR FREE AND vCLUNrARY ACT FOR Tlie U°ES AND USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED N THE INSTRUMENT. PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE NSTRUJvii. r - - . 4-I, D DATED DATED V' 1 �51GNATURE: .«-— �T]• sue. OST- 51WTVRE: L i/ - �¢�� -tIS T n e - (PRINT NAMtk ! ~ ^ � . ¢4y6 (PRINT NAM0 '+ NOTARY PUBLIC INAND FOR THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON NOTARY A NOTARY rt p NOTARY PUBLIC INAND FOR THE STATE OF WASHWONr � ,,.y, RESIDING AT !1 WYSVIt RESIDING ATiMAgYSVILd.B - pLI -'PUBLIC PUBLIC _ Nh s.2l.7at,7 - _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES ,--13 h 44t.2013 {�qZ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 4 - 21-1 2 A`- • • • • -a - .. 6.O AN •-�� QF .,rAg)•L1 - - _ STATE OF WA5HNGTON) 55.F op - STATE OF WASHNGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) jj 55. _ _ ____ COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) •� ----- I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIVENCC THAT J05ICA H. 5TONt, AN UNMARRIED WOMMT, 15 THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME. AND 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 KNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACTORY EVIDENCE THAT PAUL 5VeNMRUD ¢ ISTNti 4•MeCUp1. HUS$AIiO.& WIFE, AREA THE PERSONS WHO SAID PERSONS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE 51GNPD THIS 1115TALIMENT AND ACKNOWLU=O I7 TO BE ►itR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR TIRE5t i15 AND PURPMP5 APPEARED BEFORE Mt. AND SAID PERSONS ACKNOWI1D(:40 THAT THEY 51GNED Nil IN5TRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT- TO Be. YWR FREE AND VOLUNTARY MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED N THE INSTRUMENT. 4 DATED: '`I-Lfl DATED-!•7-10 -_ _ SICOATURL: � 0�-�• '_lam ,1 L- OSrc 51C�VATURt: !W L. OS Te - _ ¢F" �µ.5'fp,Y �r Q0 ¢1 6' (PRINT NAMEkO F� c° (PRINT NAME): , TE'I L. CISM9SNOTARY NOA^,wD Q ARY NOTARY PUBLIC INAND FOR THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON NOTARY p NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON ` u PU o _ aes_IDwq �iT s++ I,•U � a BLIC Re51DING AT MA0Y5V /L!C N PUBLIC MY APPOBiTT•{EdT EXPIRES �Ac a.21.2a13 4 21.2013 4 -21-13 Q� MY APPOINTMENT e)Q1Re5 s-21 -1 3 p 5T6Tt OF WASHINOTON WASH)�� STATE OF WASHINGiON aF wASH, _ COUNT55. Y: OF 5NOHOM$H 1 55. 1 CERTFY THAT 1,•OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT JA50H R. RUFFRIOGe, A 5NC41 MMy 15 THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BtrORC Me. AND SAID COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) r�lOyl - -+-••• _--0CR5ON5 ACKNOWLEOMO THAT ME SEINED THIS INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO Be HL5 FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THt UnP,$ AND PURPOSES I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACT09Y EVIDENCE THAT FRAN L SCOTT, AN UNMARRIED PERSON. 15 THE PERSON WHO A 0 BEFORe-114-AND MENTIONG0-IK THE INSTRUMENT. SAID PERSONS ACKNOWLEDGEO THAT 5He 51cNeD THIS INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO Be HER TREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FM THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. _ _ DMLiOc (• ,y DATED: c - -- • ..51C•�ATURE:- ._. ram/ 4 ` osr- SIgJATURE. Liz �•+� ¢i ��RC, (PRa�L-NAMek - a Q s'�*,Yp + _r _ NCFTARY PUBLIGTI AND I 'r1it STATE OF WAStEMTON ° NOTARY .w A "INT NAME NOTARY x _' ~ CL IYAQYV-,, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON � C7 RESI�h�G AT ,L- � -- -- N PUBLIC RG510INGAT_ AIAP-iSIJILL � PUBLIC '- Y•AL NT+1er(T g�-g•• �" --013 D= € U14212 - t yh 1.21.2013 QF WAS' MY APPOINTMENT tXPIRtS A-21-13 A`Q�w �� STATE OF WVHWGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON- COUNTY OF:5NOHOMI5d ) ) 55. L CERTIFY TF1AT I KNOW dRA-D NE 5ATISFACT0RY_1VbW=•THA7 W1UJW C. & JeMweiz & LEE5e, HUSBAND & WIFE. ARE THE PERSONS WHO APPEARED BEFORE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) Me AND SAID PERpSpN$ ACKHOWL+F� D THAF rAcy 5H�M TJiiE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO BE THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES 1 CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACTORY EVIDENCE THAT WEND FAI THONG & ROSEANNE GRFeNFMLO ARE THE PERSONS WHO APPEARED BEFORE Me. AND PURPOSES M mvf4w*t-a71C NwwjfiENT. AND SAID PERSONS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY 51GNED TH15 INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED THAT THEY WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTe THE INSTRUMENT AND DATED: ACKNOWLEDGED IT, AS TRUSTEES OF THE GReeNFrLD-THONG TRUST DATED JULY 22, 1997. TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY �GryATURC 1 �� �, �� • -•-• •• OSr FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. �' FA DATED: 3-214-I0 �,..�.� O'RINTNAMGk Qe^d�1wrYY'C:r C�1 L. OSrr: { NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATC.OF WASI4WTON- •••� 't 4 NOTARY 9 5ICJ'iATVRE: .�L !•� ¢zJ -- ¢ °ems rP p Re5IDING AT M4evG.Olt_�G w� '* BLS (PRINT NAMek I. I've I. CSTrriC__ARR+'1 1� ` NOTARY 'A MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON -� An PUBLIC 1 Q'`: tING !.`Y Re5AT M A IL+ LLF qIASFD�v p, 21da13 _ MY APPOINTMENT eXPIRes 4 -II -13 �Qa WA STATE OF WA5HINGTON BY CHECKED OATS 11 S5. NO. - REVISION-�••- COUNTY OF 5NOHOMISH Y I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE 5AT15FACTORY EVIDENCE THAT MATTHEW A. PtSCADOR. A MARRIED MAN. AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE, IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE Me, AND SAID PERSONS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT He SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED Ii TO Bt HI5 FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED N THE IN T. DATED 4- r�7-r_ � OS rF� SKTIATURE: - iE NOTARY w. , - � -i_ cs (PRINT NAMtk Tlt -� '; L.-� ��' ; NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WA5HINGTON PUBLIC "P /.21-2013 aesIDING AT N r�_w, f. � j._� a _ . MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES .f -t► _ 13 op LAFC 201211 -!O4jNN { Packet Pg. 408 CITY pR-EDMONDS ¢DUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 4 FOUND 1' LP. N0.2' 9.7' - - ak-) "° . 40.00' INGRESS, CGRE55 6 UTILITY EA5tMENT. 5tE EA5tMENT— NOTE ON THE RIGHT LOT 4, BLOCK 7 HANBURYS SOUND VIEW TRAM VOL. 7, PG. 20 25.3' LOT 3, BLOCK 2 HANBURYS SOUND VIEW TRACTS VOL. 7, PG, 20 EXI5TNG BUILDING l FOUND R/C 'LSA •9091' NO.P%W0x �:1 FOUND REBAR W0.17(50.7 PARCEL A BEFORE AFTER 29253 5F QP055 24.704 5F GR055 1 24.670 5F NET 24.704 5F NET I FIR GROVE CONDOMINIUM 57b I AFN 200701055202 Uj Io k --' _ M5TNG BVUNG x 46.0' _ !I O1 AA.IUS1Yra _ x � DECKS-'-� f �T 10' 1 - N9 7'OOZ 130,Od rx—•x 90.00, - —x 1b1' ,: x 19.51 � 1 N 1 _ _ FOUND R/C a 'L5A •9091' I t N0.1' > ` ' J I �3 FOUND CBNC. MDN N 1 CASE W/ BRASS TALC— �' 269.19'-'I� 269.21'-ROS e AFs 'Z-O IZI E 2-0 5bo 1 IC�' LOT I EX. 5FR III--• -:L�- DECI',- x PARCEL 'B ' -•- BEFORE AFTER 10,036 5F GRO55 15.305 5F CR055 - 10.036 SF NET 10,036 5F NET 134s' x 1aLW 8.6 171' 2 30 15 0 30 SCALE: 1'-30' 1-EGEND O FOUND IRON PIPE OR BAR AND CAP (RBC) AS NOTED. ® FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED. EOP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT FOC - FACE OF CURB PLNT - PLANTER M - MEASURED GR055 - TOTAL LOT AREA 2 NET - LOT AREA M11NU5 ANY AREA DEVOTED TO VEHICULAR NGRE55/EGRE55 EASEMENT BASIS OP BEARING N09.45'00'E BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN ALONG 230TH 5T. 5W (HANBURY DRIVE) PER PLATS AND 5URVEY'5 REFERENCED BELOW. SURVEY REFERENCES P - HANBURY5 SOUND VIEW TRACTS, VOL 7, PC. 20 R05 - RECORD OF SURVEY BY LOVELL-5AUERLAND h A55OC. INC. VOL 7, PG. 145 LA - LAR50N ADDITION, VOL 2L PG. 51 WSDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND LIMITED ACCESS MAP FOR 5.R. 104 FROM 236TH ST. 5W TO MERIDIAN AVE. SHEET 2 OF 4, DATED MARCH 12, 1970. VILLA ROYALE, A CONDOMINIUM, VOL 40. PCS. 41-46 RECORD OF 5URVEY, VOL 0, PG. 117 RECORD OF 5URVEY, AFN 200211135004 SURVEY NOTES EQUIPMENT: 5' ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION AND/OR TOPCON GB 500 RTK CPS METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE AND/OR RTK CPS THE CLOSURES OF TH15 FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED DURING TH15 SURVEY MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM CLOSURE STANDARDS STATED N WAC 332-130-090. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS 00463300700302, 01062700000700, 01062700000500. 01062700000900, 01062700001000 01052700000100. 01062700000200. 01062700000300. 01062700000400, 01062700000500 6 01062700000600 .. ZONING - MULTIPLE FAMILY RE510ENT1AL (RM 1-5) EASEMENT NOTE ... _ gL,--�•' THE NGRE55, EGRP55, AND UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN OVER THE WEST 40 FEET OF PARCEL B 15 FOR 5HARE0 ORIVEWAY AND UTILITY FACILITIES TO THE BENEFIT Of PARCEL A 6 PARCEL B. THE OWNERS OF PARCELS A h 5 SHALL EQUALLY SHARE THE Rt9PO0516ILITY FOR MAINTENANCE, - -- -_ RECONSTRUCTION, REPAIR AND C05T OF THE SHARED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY FACILITIES. PARCELS = ? A 6 B ARE HEREBY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THOSE UTILITY FACILITIES SERVNG - - THEIR RESPECTIVE PARCELS. TH15 EA5EMtNT HEREBY REPLACES THAT EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER AFN ?W70105O551 BLIND R/C - `L5A •�191' _ - E01'_ 260.Od • • FOUND CpNe FfW N . •^ CASG �T NVEP1TLD TL11L - _ - 130Ad-LA 129.91'-f1 FOVND CONC MON IN _ CASC W/ NVERTID HAiI. .-. N09'45'00't 659.17-M 659.21'-P _ 238TH STREET SLU (HANBURY DRIVE) b k 0 fop _ _ _•_� - - E - Packet Pg. 409 OF EDAJ Notice of Application and SEPA Determination - File Numbers PLN20190055 AnC. lggo NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a total of 5 units with associated parking. The duplex and the triplex are proposed in a two (2) story building and each unit will contain 2- bedrooms. Parking for the units will be provided via a one car garage for each unit along with driveway parking. Additional parking spaces will be provided adjacent to the driveways. Access to the proposed development will be taken off of 238' St. SW. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III -A decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). Name of Applicant: Thor Sunde Location: 8629 238' St. SW., Edmonds, WA, Tax Parcel Number 004633007003 File Nos.: PLN20190055 (Design Review) Date of Application: October 15, 2019 Date of Notice: November 26, 2019 Date of Completeness: November 12, 2019 Requested Permits: Design Review. Notice of Public Hearing will be provided once a date has been scheduled. Other Required Permits: Building permits. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Determination, SEPA Environmental Checklist, Preliminary Drainage Report Comments on Proposal Due: December 10, 2019. Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Office hours are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:30 a.m. to noon. Information can also be viewed online through the City's website at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen-. Search under permit file number PLN20190055. City Contact: Michele Q. Szafran, (425) 771-0220, michele.szafrankedmondswa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Lead Agency: The City of Edmonds is SEPA lead agency for the proposed subdivision (File Nos. PLN20190055). SEPA Determination: Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11-340(2) for the above project. Date of Issuance: November 26, 2019 SEPA Comments Due: December 10, 2019 SEPA Appeal Deadline: December 17, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. Appeals must be filed in writing citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 — 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 410 -n E 0 -C 0 00 m a, O C m 10 oyv- Poll CO E 0 ro t2 L CD CM 0 ik* (D E cc 0 q Lc L cc, Packet tPg4ll FILE NO.: PLN20190055 Applicant: Thor Sunde DECLARATION OF POSTING On November 26, 2019, the attached Notice of Development Application and Request for Public Comment was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Michele Q. Szafran, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 26t" day of November 2019, at Edmonds, Washington. a Signed:.Z�, Li f.J ! Y {BFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 412 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Leanna Hartell being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH882326 PLN20190055 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 11/26/2019 and ending on 11/26/2019 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such public tion is $106.79. Subscribed and sw n before me on this _,2 da of Y C� Not Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds -LEGAL ADS 114101416 MICFIELE SZAFRAN Linda Phillips _ w hl tft Public Stat Washington Mya ment EXPZ 08/29/2021 Packet Pg. 413 Classified Proof CITY -OF EDMONDS Notice ol'Applidaflon and SEPA Determination - File 141Umbers'PL1,120.190055 NOTICE OF'APPLI.GATION Descrl tion of'Pro osal: The applicant 1s proposing to. constructs qta of units With associated parking. The duplex: and the triplex are proposed -in a two' (2)'story building and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms: Parking'&'the units will be provided.via'a one car garage for each 1.Unit along with driveway parking: •Additlonal parging spaces' Will be provided adjacentto the driveways. Access to the proposed development will be taken off of Q38th St. SW, Design' revieW projects 'Which '(iigger SEPA are Type III•A daCISlgns.jhe site Is.locq ed Within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling Lnit per 1,50 ,0 "square feet of lot area). ocaion:. 6„ Mlh,St. $W. Edmonds,W TaxParcei Number 004633007003 Flle Nos.> PLN2Q190055-(Desl'gn Revie(v) Date rof Application "October •15, 2019 Date.o�f CoIn l�te�ness: November 12, 2019 Date o of N dce. Novem ar26,'2019 Re uesied Permits: Design Review: Notice of Public Hearing will e,providadonce a date has been,scheduled. Other lReclulied Permits:. Building permits. Re ulre� d Stuclles: None Existing Envlronmenta Documents: Critical Areas Determination, SEPAEnvironmental Checklist, Preliminary Drainage Report Comments on Pro 6osal Due: December 10 2019, Any person as the right to comment gnthis application during the publi4 comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings and.rdouest a copy of the decision on the application. The City may "accept public comments, at any- time, prior to the closing of the'record of an open record predeclsion hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecislon hearing Is provided, prior to the decision on the Project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC.20.06.020 have standing to Iniliafe an,adminlstrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department,, 121 , 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020-Office hours are. Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:39 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:30 a.m. to noon, Information can also b'e yiewed online through the'City's website at htlos:%Vrmhs.ed nond's.wa.uslcitizen. $ea(6h under permit Ole number PLN20190055. CIN Contact: Michele C. Szafran, (425) 771-0220, miche le. szafra n&Dedmondsw a.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AC I &PA) NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNI ICANCE Lead Agen�c s The City of Edmonds Is SEPA lead agency for the propo, sad subdivision (File Nos: PLN20190055). 'SEPA Detemiination: Notice Is hereby given that the City of Edmonds Determination of Nonsi nificance DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2 forthe above project. Date of Issuance: November 26, 2019 SEPA Comments Due: December 10, 2019 SEPA A eal Deadline: December 17 '2019 at 4:00 .m. Appeals must a lied n writing citing t e spec lc reasons for appeal with the required fee to. the City of Edmonds. Planning Division, 121 - 6th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Published: NOXember 26, 2019. EDH882326 Proofed by Hat -tell, Leanna, 11/26/2019 08:39:59 am Pago: ? Packet Pg. 414 FILE NO.: PLN20190055 Applicant: Thor Sunde DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 261h day of November, 2019, the attached Notice of Development Application was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above - referenced application. I, Michelle Martin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 260' day of November 2019, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed � lit. {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 415 01072200620200 8/23/2019 01072200810200 8/23/2019 01072200720100 8/23/2019 NORDEEN TERRY W & MARC or RESIDENT VO HUYNH NHU THI or RESIDENT ARCHARD DAVID W/KATHLE or RESIDENT 621 S MAJESTIC VIEW DR 13032 CARRIAGE RD 25592 ROCKY BEACH LN POST FALLS, ID 83854 POWAY, CA 92064 DANA POINT, CA 92629 01062700000400 6/23/2019 THONG FRANCIS WENG FAI or RESIDENT 8921 LA PALOMA ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 01072200710200 8/23/2019 PARK PLACE AT EDMONDS or RESIDENT PO BOX 1325 BOTHELL, WA 98011 00463301000301 8/23/2019 AYERS GERRIT R or RESIDENT PO BOX 459 EDMONDS, WA 98020 01072200620100 8/23/2019 DUONG SON T or RESIDENT 20933 37TH AVE SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 00463300200503 8/23/2019 ARLEY RANDALL G/ALYSSA or RESIDENT 8730 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 00678500020600 8/23/2019 ROBERTS ELIZABETH or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 206 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700100100 8/23/2019 TERRENZIO LAURA C or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW #A1 EDMONDS. WA 98026 00688700100600 8/23/2019 WAALE VIENNA M or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A6 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700101000 8/23/2019 CLIFFORD MICHAEL L/JOA or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT Al 01072200820200 8/23/2019 BENNETT KELLY & MATTHE-or RESIDENT 75 6081 ALII DR Q201 KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740 00463301000305 8/23/2019 YEN SHIU POO or RESIDENT 14611 13TH AVE SE MILL CREEK, WA 98012-5519 00678500020200 8/23/2019 ROBINSON JENNA or RESIDENT PO BOX 1013 EDMONDS, WA 98020 00463300200301 8/23/2019 HOFFMAN DONNA J or RESIDENT 8820 224TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 00463301000100 8/23/2019 GIUSTI RIANA/POTVIN RY or RESIDENT 8606 238TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 00678500030300 8/23/2019 CHEN BAOQUAN/WU XIAOYA or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 303 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700100200 8/23/2019 WAHLMEIER PATRICK J/HU or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW # A 2 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700100700 8/23/2019 OSWALD LAURALEE N or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW #A7 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700101100 8/23/2019 AUGENBRAUN JEANNE or RESIDENT 8713 238ST SW A-11 DMONDS, WA 98026:0 Etiquettes d'adres Pat avery.ann%patents � a la hachure '.� 01072200810100 8/23/2019 GAO SHAN or RESIDENT 5125 120TH AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 00463300600100 8/23/2019 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DIS or RESIDENT 23725 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 00688700200100 8/23/2019 CURTIS TAMARA L or RESIDENT 8719 238TH ST SW #B-1 EDMONDS, WA 98020 00463300200404 8/23/2019 TODD SARAH S or RESIDENT 8724 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 00495600000600 8/23/2019 NICKEL KENT C & TAMMY or RESIDENT 23822 86TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 00678500030600 8/23/2019 MCCOY CHRISTINA or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW #306 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700100300 8/23/2019 CLARK BRENT A & APRIL or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A3 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700100900 8/23/2019 CLAUSEN BRENNA L or RESIDENT 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A9 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700200300 8/23/2019 LEE RICHARD/MAHONEY KA or RESIDENT 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B3 EDMONDS, WA 98026 Allez Packet ' • 416 UtilisezleUabaritAver 51bt1 I. 00688700200400 8/23/2019 00688700200500 8/2312019 00688700200600 6/23/2019 HARRIS AMANDA C or RESIDENT GIBSON KARA/BRZYTWA PH or RESIDENT WEBB ARLA K TTEE or RESIDENT 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-4 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B5 8719 238TH ST SW # 136 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00688700200700 8/23/2019 00688700300500 8123/2019 00688700300700 8/23/2019 NIELSEN ALBERTA or RESIDENT RIGGS STEPHEN ELSON or RESIDENT BAKER JERALD R or RESIDENT 8719 238TH SW #B7 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C5 8723 238TH STREET SW UNIT C7 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 01062700000300 8/23/2019 01062700000500 8/23/2019 01062700000600 8123/2019 WILLIS DANETTE J or RESIDENT COMADURAN RAOUL or RESIDENT O'NEILL KORRYN or RESIDENT 8705 238TH STREET SW UNIT C 8705 238TH ST SW UNIT E 8705 238TH ST SW UNIT F EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 a� E O t 01062700000700 8/23/2019 01062700000800 8/23/2019 01062700001000 8/23/2019 3 BERGSTROM THEODORE J or RESIDENT BED80N BRYAN/KILEY or RESIDENT ARDITTY SABIN/ALLISON or RESIDENT O 8705 238TH ST SW G 8705 238TH ST SW H 8705 238TH ST SW UNIT J F- EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 c O Ln W) 01072200130100 B123/2019 01072200210100 8/23/2019 01072200210200 8/23/2019 Co KAYE SHANA L or RESIDENT EUTSLER TROY ALLEN or RESIDENT FULLERTON DOMINIKA or RESIDENT oo 8615 238TH ST SW # A301 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT B101 8615 238TH STREET 13102 c EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 04 Z J d N 01072200230200 8/23/2019 01072200310100 8/23/2019 01072200310200 8123/2019 ASMUS JULIA K or RESIDENT HOIDA LINDA NAOMI or RESIDENT WALKER AMY S or RESIDENT N t 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT B302 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT C101 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT C-102 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 r r Q 06 01072200320100 8/23/2019 01072200320200 8/23I2019 01072200410100 8/23/2019 O Q- KIM DO -NOON or RESIDENT EGGLESTON MYCALE or RESIDENT WING NGAKWAN/LAM KWOKK or RESIDENT d 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT C-201 8615 238 ST SW UNIT C202 8615 238TH STREET SW UNIT D101 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 N r c m 01072200410200 8/23/2019 01072200420100 8/23/2019 01072200430100 8/23/2019 E SAGE LEISHA C or RESIDENT RUSSELL ELIZABETH W or RESIDENT WHITE LIBERTY N or RESIDENT v 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT D102 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT D-201 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT D301 m r EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 Q 01072200430200 8/23/2019 FRAMBES RILEY or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT D302 EDMONDS, WA 98026 01072200510100 8/23/2019 BYERLY BARBARA B or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 01072200510200 8/23/2019 SARMIENTO MARIA CLARIN or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW NO E102 EDMONDS, WA 98026 01072200520200 8/23/2019 01072200610200 8/23/2019 01072200630100 8/23/2019 SLAVIK JACALYN R or RESIDENT HUNT RUTH MARIE or RESIDENT ORME LESLIE A or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW #E202 8615 238TH ST SW, UNIT F102 8615 238TH ST SW F301 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 'i Allen Packet ' • Utiiisez I,e Ldl-ld 111 HVC[y 'I— ,.i Go to avery.com/templates Use Avery lempl it(-51 GO i 01072200630200 8/23/2019 01072200710100 8/23/2019 01072200820100 8/23/2019 LERVAAG CINDY or RESIDENT WRIGHT KATHERINE or RESIDENT HIGGINS KATY N or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT F-302 8615 238TH ST SW #G101 8615 238TH ST SW #H2O1 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 01072200830100 8/23/2019 01072200830200 8123/2019 01072200730100 8/23/2019 KLEIN ALFRED J or RESIDENT MCINTOSH KYLE or RESIDENT RAD AL & LUCILA or RESIDENT 8615 238TH ST SW, UNIT H301 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT H302 17410 76TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-5008 00463301000306 8/23/2019 00512800000400 8/23/2019 00512800000500 8/23/2019 HINTZEN BARBARA or RESIDENT HANSON PATRICIA J or RESIDENT SCHMIDT TERI L or RESIDENT 22617 87TH PL W 23630 86TH AVE W 23704 86TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026-8228 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8910 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8911 N a� E O t 00688700100400 8123/2019 00688700100500 8/23/2019 00688700100800 8/23/2019 BOERNER LYNN M or RESIDENT MCLEOD DONNA A or RESIDENT VERNON VICTORIA V or RESIDENT 0 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A-4 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A-5 8713 238TH ST SW UNIT A-8 - EDMONDS, WA 98026-8916 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8916 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8916 O Ln W) 00463300200102 8/23/2019 00463300200201 8/23/2019 00463300200203 8/23/2019 G O WINN ANN C or RESIDENT ELSASSER JOHN E or RESIDENT CAUSER GEORGE E & CHAR or RESIDENT o6 8608 236TH ST SW 8624 236TH ST SW 8622 236TH ST SW c EDMONDS, WA 98026-8920 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8920 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8920 N Z J d N 00463300200302 8/23/2019 00463300200403 8/23/2019 00678500010100 6/23/2019 REUNANEN C C & H A or RESIDENT MIKKELSON MARK J or RESIDENT THOMAS MARLENE S or RESIDENT E 8704 236TH ST SW 8718 236TH ST SW 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 101 v EDMONDS, WA 98026-8921 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8921 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 r r Q 06 1` 00678500010200 8123/2019 00678500010300 8/23/2019 00678500010400 8123/2019 0 Q HAYNES MECHELLE & NAM or RESIDENT HUSSEN SANI/YIFIRU MUL or RESIDENT CHRISMAN LORI A or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 102 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 103 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 105 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 c�a co r c m 00678500010500 8/23/2019 00678500010600 8/23/2019 00678500020300 8/23/2019 E HAAGA TERESA G or RESIDENT JANSSEN MARCELLA M or RESIDENT KUONEN WILLIAM D or RESIDENT v 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 105 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 106 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 203 r EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8947 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8948 Q 00678500020400 8/23/2019 00678500020500 8/23/2019 00678500030100 8/23/2019 REYES JUAN or RESIDENT GHERMAN DIANE E or RESIDENT AL-QURISHI HAMED ALI & or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 204 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 205 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 301 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8948 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8948 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949 00678500030200 6/23/2019 00678500030400 8/23/2019 00678500030500 8/23/2019 DUENAS PAUL F or RESIDENT AMUNDSEN CAROL J or RESIDENT HERRING JENNIFER or RESIDENT 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 302 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 304 8614 238TH ST SW UNIT 305 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8949 _ NNNJPacket Pg. 418 a e 00688700200200 8/23/2019 00688700200800 8/23/2019 00686700200900 8/23/2019 THOMAS TERESA or RESIDENT BESS TERESA C or RESIDENT KUSTER KAREN or RESIDENT 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-2 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-8 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-9 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980 00688700201000 8/23/2019 00688700300200 8/23/2019 00688700300300 8/23/2019 SHARMA ABHA or RESIDENT BULANYY IGOR & BULANA or RESIDENT GREEN FIELD -MATH ISO N RO or RESIDENT 8719 238TH ST SW UNIT B-10 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-2 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8980 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982 00688700300400 8/23/2019 00688700300800 8/23/2019 00688700301100 8/23/2019 HOOPER ALAN K or RESIDENT MICHAELS SHEILA/ TRACY or RESIDENT ZINGLER KARI or RESIDENT 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-4 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-8 8723 238TH ST SW UNIT C-11 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8982 00495600000100 8/23/2019 00463301000302 8/23/2019 01062700000100 8/23/2019 REED MARLENE D or RESIDENT RNK EASTSIDE LLC or RESIDENT STROME ANDREA ML or RESIDENT 23805 86TH AVE W 4580 KLAHANIE DR SE UNIT 177 12822 NE 136TH ST EDMONDS, WA 98026-9000 ISSAQUAH, WA 98029 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 00688700300600 8/23/2019 01072200530100 8/23/2019 01072200110100 8/23/2019 GERLACH DAVID PHILIP/E or RESIDENT LYCKE CASSANDRA or RESIDENT SCHARF CALEB/SCHARF RE or RESIDENT 23318 29TH AVE W 6527 193RD ST SW 16421 66TH AVE W BRIER, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036-5116 LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 01072200330200 8/23/2019 01072200530200 8/23/2019 00463300700302 8/23/2019 CHAMBERS DEBORAH G or RESIDENT HOUSTON BARRY or RESIDENT SUNDE THOR or RESIDENT 22002 39TH AVE W 22002 39TH AVE W 24225 85TH AVE SE MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043-4239 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043-4239 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072-9525 00688700301000 8/23/2019 01072200610100 6/23/2019 01072200730200 8/23/2019 ASAF AUDINEH C & DIAS or RESIDENT STEGNER ROBERT or RESIDENT SEAMAN SLOAN D/KIM HAE or RESIDENT 4104 164TH ST SW UNIT 301 1510 NW 52ND ST APT 305 1537 NW 51 ST LYNNWOOD, WA 98087 SEATTLE, WA 98107 SEATTLE, WA 98107 01072200120100 8/23/2019 01072200230100 8/23/2019 01062700000900 8/23/2019 TENSEN HEATHER or RESIDENT WISMAN LAURA MCDANIEL or RESIDENT HENRY JOHN H/SARAN M T or RESIDENT 2241 40TH AVE E 8615 238TH ST SW UNIT B301 10021 LAKE SHORE BLVD NE SEATTLE, WA 98112 SEATTLE, WA 98117 SEATTLE, WA 98125 00688700300900 8/23/2019 00678500020100 8/23/2019 00463300800500 8/23/2019 MACHARIA KAREN or RESIDENT MCCALLISTER TERRY or RESIDENT JOHNSON RONALD D & MAI or RESIDENT 1415 N 200TH ST #B6 1702 192ND ST 19601 23RD NW SHORELINE, WA 98133 SHORELINE, WA 98155 SHORELINE, WA 98177 01062700000200 8/23/2019 01072200110200 8/23/2019 01072200120200 8/23/2019 MOSLEY GREG/KAPUSCINSK or RESIDENT ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT 831 NW 177TH PL 16750 16TH AVE NW 16750 16TH AVE NW SHORELINE, WA 98177 SHORELINE, WA 98177 SHORELINE, WA 98177 Packet Pg. 419 01072200130200 8/23/2019 01072200220100 8/23/2019 01072200330100 8/23/2019 ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT 16750 16TH AVE NW 16750 16TH AVE NW 16750 16TH AVE NW SHORELINE, WA 98177 SHORELINE, WA 98177 SHORELINE, WA 98177 01072200520100 8/23/2019 WEHMEYER NEIL & MARY or RESIDENT 328 NW RICHMOND BEACH RD SHORELINE, WA 98177 01072200720200 8/23/2019 ENGINEERS INVESTMENT C or RESIDENT 16750 16TH AVE NW SHORELINE, WA 98177 00463301000402 8123/2019 GOLDEN ART LP or RESIDENT 2614 COLBY AVE #1 EVERETT, WA 98201 00688700300100 8/23/2019 01072200220200 8/23/2019 01072200420200 8/23/2019 MORGAN EAMON or RESIDENT BURMER DEBORAH L or RESIDENT GAUGER RICHARD J/KIMBE or RESIDENT PO BOX 4324 1989 EDGEFIELD DR 1594 SOCKEYE LN EVERETT, WA 98204 BELLINGHAM, WA 98229 FREELAND, WA 98249 Allen Packet ' • UtilisezleC,abaiitAver 51bU I ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. `i SWature of Applicant or A fi ant's Representative Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 C�)-a"' day of 0c i DG E6z , Z C) I — 0 r-'`S�bH '''o�noo►,, ef� �� Uy s 201998 yr►'�►rr�•D9,7.T•t� fill Notary Public in and fthe State of Washington tiVV �`� Residing at Revised on 9130111 P2 -Adjacent Property Owners List Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 421 � Q1 El711.,0 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a total of 5 units with associated parking. The duplex and the triplex are proposed in a two (2) story building and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Parking for the units will be provided via a one car garage for each unit along with driveway parking. Additional parking spaces will be provided adjacent to the driveways. Access to the proposed development will be taken off of 238th St. SW. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III -A decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). Proponent: Thor Sunde Location of proposal: 8629 238th St. SW., Edmonds, WA, Tax Parcel Number 004633007003 Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 10, 2019 . Project Planner: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 Date: Signature:" -- XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than December 17, 2019 . You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on November 26, 2019 , at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecy.). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents are available at https:/Zpermits-edmonds.wa.us/citizen - . Search for file number PLN20190055. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division — located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. Page 1 of 2 DRAFT SEPA DETERMINATION REVISED 20190311 11/26/19 SEPA - Packet Pg. 422 Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: N Applicant N Dept. of Ecology ❑ City of Everett ❑ Parties of Record ❑ Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ City of Lynnwood ❑ Dept. of Natural Resources ❑ City of Mountlake Terrace ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Dept. of Commerce ❑ City of Mukilteo ❑ US Fish and Wildlife N WSDOT ❑ City of Shoreline ❑ WSDOT— Ferries ❑ Town of Woodway N Puget Sound Energy ❑ Dept. of Fish & Wildlife N Snohomish PUD ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑ Snohomish Co. Public Works N Olympic View Water & Sewer N Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS ❑ Alderwood Water District ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. N Edmonds School District ❑ Port of Edmonds ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ King County - Transit N South County Fire ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ King County — Environ. Planning N Swedish Hospital ❑ Puget Sound Partnership N Community Transit N Tulalip Tribe ❑ Other pc: File No. SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 DRAFT SEPA DETERMINATION REVISED 20190311 11/26/19 SEPA - Packet Pg. 423 #P71 CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This enviromnental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfidly to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sunde Townhornes 2. Name of applicant: Thor Sunde 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant Contact Person Thor Sunde Puget Sound Planning 24225 85"' Ave SE _ .41m: Lee .4. rllirlrcrc:lis, MCP Woodinville, WA 98072 5005 200"' St. SO, Suite /0I-B Lwinis'ood. PVA 9830Fr (425) 770-0844 (425) 830-1046 sundrentals acginail.coin lee. rnichaelisLi),ugetsornidplarrning;corrs 4. Date checklist prepared: 4LIgust 28, 2019 Augarst 18, 1019 Sunde Townhomes Page 1 0% 20 r a Packet Pg. 424 5. Agency requesting checklist: Cia of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Administrative Design Review Approval Fall 2019 through Winter 201912020 Building Permit Approval Winler 2020 through &rinjz 2020 Construction &ring 2020 through Fall 2020 (STAFF COMMENTS) _ 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No plans for future additions, expansions, or fu ther activity beyond 5 townhouses (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Citv of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Geotechnical Engineereport _ Civil Engineer Drainage Report (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No Known applications are Pendinz or other proposals directly affecting this property or project. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Determination Civil Construction Permits Design Review Board Approval Right of Way Permits Building Permits (STAFF COMMENTS),rvd�E?CYni di,r�rx�� can w i+" : Limo i c _ S99AA or 'CEI LA-2L%*Z i L m E 0 t _ 3 0 d _ Cn In u� 0 0 0 0 N Z J IL _ d E t c� a 06 r- 0 a d 0 Cn m E z v Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 2 of 20 Packet Pg. 425 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed geglicalion seeks gpprovalfor the canstrrrclian a 5 townhouse units com rised a-L a du lex on the north ortian o •the prWerty and a tri lea on the sourly portion o nc� ro ert . The ra-ect also includes 1he •onsiruction o Arkin and rlrivr ircr .s fior 9 cars, !he installation a tivater sewer, and•storm Lor each o the traits and an ❑ site drivewa to the west that connects to 2381h St. SW. The subieclproperU is approximatelyypproximately 10,836 square feet in area (STAFF COMMENTS) w m 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your 0 proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would c occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity o map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 0 The pijTosal is located at 8629 2381 St SW in the City o ' Edinonds, alscr identi ied as Snohomish Counly Tax Parcel U) Number 004633007.00302. The property is located within Section 31, Township 27N, Range 04 E. u� c (STAFF COMMENTS) r N Z J IL w c d E z TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT a B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 0 a 1. Earth d a. General description of the site (circle one) I la#, ❑fling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:Cn The site slo es gendytothesoulh with less than a ew eet o elevation di et•ential across the pinperty, The t•o grt r c is bordered to the north east and west b ycondominhan andlor apartment buildings and to the south by 238`" St E SW. Most o the native vegetation was prevLotisl removed and is now over rmvn wilh i blackberrybrush and z � a rass. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The slope on the property is less than 10 percent. (STAFF COMMENTS) _ Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 3 of 20 Packet Pg. 426 C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. According to the Geotechnical En i►Q eerigg Report by Associaled Earth Sciences MES), the sile .soils eg neratlY consist o ll and lod metal fill. AES dyg one Lr loratinn pit 10'degp in the soulhern hctl o the lot. In the ro l-2 [eel, ill soils were found that were made an o •loose moist, jzrag sill, sand with Jzravel and as• hall debris. The re►nainin 8' o the ex loration it was made u o %vetithered lod ituent lill and lod mcnr rill which consists naostl o dense moist sdu sand More above the soils can be 1bund in Section V in the CGeolechnical En ineerin Re rl. (STAFF COMMENTS) krQAi C� 5v� . &JfV0,A1J A-V4— G ik— i S V)\&y 1M III! .'IPA It�, ■ /1 + a ! • i d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. there are no known indications of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity (STAFF COMMENTS e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Aporaxirnalely 480 cubic yards of•cut is needed to excavate for the buildbw lbundalions. Approximately 40 cubic yards of that will be used for fill to level the driveways. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally describe. Very liule erosion could occur i►? the northern Poiqion of the Property during excavation for the foundalion. The depth o cut will be limited so )tverosion __wrrould be managed on site. } (STAFF COMMENTSc` �'� � 0s rla- cot, �-"l ' ell+ 0,12nO-y&OX� cvr • c111t IIIIII (!�>WPQ9 r.00� tV;.,1� CanS�-kvc•A0 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 7,314 square feet of the property will be covered with impervious stir which is 67.4 percent ol'the site. h. Revised on 9119116 (STAFF C0112M.ENTS Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sih fencing svill be established around the perimeter ofihe project. Plastic sheathinm or tarps will cover disturbed soils. s l (STAFF COMMENTS) GAC k.[` nia, SEPA Checklist docx 'Tc"T ~ Page 4 of 20 Packet Pg. 427 ice\ I.1 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions resullingfi•om the compleled pruiecl in ludo vehicle emissions wood b717117in, stove or outdoor lires. Dust may be izenerated fram yard work and cleaning o roo s and concrete. (STAFF COMMEN N m E 0 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 3 There are no off -site sources of emission or odors that would effect the ro osal 0 d (STAFF COMMENTS) c Cn u� 0 • o C6 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the project, if any: c N CDnstruction enfissions will be controlled by watering the site cleaning vehicle at the construction entrance and J not a►7 the public roads. LoLng term emissions that would result rom the project are at minimal levels that no a w measures are needed to reduce emission. d E (STAFF COMMENTS) c� r Q 0 3. WATER Q- d a. Surface: c� co (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. z There are no surface water bodies in the immediate vicinity of the site. M Q (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The p� (c ecl will not require cool' work over, its, or arlacenl lu waters within 200. feet of the subject sire. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx ''age 5 of 20 Packet Pg. 428 (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or fired e material is ex Gc1L'cl to be laced in or removed i•oin swj• jce water or wetlands in the immediate vicini o the pLoject site. (STAFF COMMENTS (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposal will not require surface water withdrawals or diversions _ (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The proposal does not lie within a !QQ- ear ood lain. (STAFF COMMENTS (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No the proposal does not involve ank discharge of waste material to surface waters. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No there will be water withdrawn Lom a_well for drinking water or for any other purposes. No water will be discharged to roundwale1•. (STAFF COMMENT Q (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be dischar ed into the ground Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist. docx Page 6 of20 Packet Pg. 429 c. d. 4. Plants (STAFF COMMENTS) Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source a wcrler runo incltrdes starn+water rune . i om ► oo to s sidewulks suet clri7�eivcr s. The rtr+ro will be collected by downspouts, yard drains. French drains, and catch basins. The water will flom, into an on -site detention pipe, treated for water qualiand released into the ci 's storms stem. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste material could Spill in kround water i T inure homeowners clunT chemicals or other hazardous materials on to the lawn area. (STAFF COMMENTS (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The proposal will ulte►• on -site drainage patterns. Curre►i11v the slorinwaler sheet flows across the site with no flow control or treatment or water c trcrlil k That alter will be altered 6 collecte2 the storrrtrvater on - site and treating it. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The design, ap rp oval, and construction of a stormwater system in compliance will city regulations will help reduce and control surface and drainage pattem impacts. No groundwater im acts are anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS)_ _�'lb- C4� W � �( Ulf "+l a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ® deciduous tree: Idcr, map! aspen, other: ® evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine other: a� E 0 z c 3 0 F- m c 0 Ln LO 0 0 M 0 N Z J Qr N c m E z U 0 r r Q 0 a m c m E t U R .r r a Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.doex Page 7 of 20 Packet Pg. 430 ® shrubs ® grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:_ other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) m _ E b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 0 c A m a i ori ty of the ve etation on site will be removed to make sufficient roam to construct the townhouses and install c H needed utilities existing trees along the east property line will be retained. c (STAFF COMMENTS) rn u� 0 0 r 0 N C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. J No known threatened or enda►z gered species are located on or near the site. _ _ a w (STAFF COM M E NTS) E z c� a d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 0 0. Landscaping pi:Wosed fbr the site includes native ever Teen trees along the north property lute to provide visual � ai7d noise scree►iitt L � r Cn (STAFF COMMENTS) m E z 0 Q e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Blackberries are the only knoww invasive plant located on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS} Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 8 of 20 Packet Pg. 431 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: awk heron, eagle, songbirds, other crow sea u mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other �quirrc fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) m E 0 z b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 3 No known threateaved or endangered species are on or near the site. 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) d c Cn ' o - o CD c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. c No. this site is not part of a migration route N Z J IL (STAFF COMMENTS) w _ d — E t c� d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Q No measures are beingproposed because there is no known wildh e on the property. (STAFF COMMENTS) 0 0 Cn e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. E No known invasive species are on or near the site. v (STAFF COMMENTS) Q 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Heating will be done by electric and natural gas. Lighting_will be by electricity. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 SEP,4 Checklist.docx "age 9 of 20 Packet Pg. 432 7. b. C. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, this project will not affect the potential for adjacent properties to use solar energy. (STAFF COMMENTS) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: EneLa credits to comply with the Washington State Energy Code are included in the Tans. (STAFF COMMENTS) w m E 0 z c 3 0 Environmental Health ~ d a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, M spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. Cn There are no know environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proVosal. c C6 (STAFF COMMENTS) c N Z J a c (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. W There are no known contaminants or contamination at the site from present or past uses. W (STAFF COMMENTS) Q 0 a d (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project C area and in the vicinity. c There are no known existing hazardous chemicals or conditlons that tnight aJ ecl the RrAecl development °) E z and desi n. v (STAFF COMMENTS) Q (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. During, construction o the rv'ect uel and cleaners may be stored an site. At thcametianothere jeci household cleaners and fuel may be stored on -site. (STAFF COMMENTS Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist. docx Page 10 of 20 Packet Pg. 433 (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Enterge�acv services that mau be recdtrired include fire and medical services that are liTical of'conslruction sites and eventually for the residents that will live in the finished proiect. (STAFF COMMENT (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise An ran -site s ill revenlion and control ptan iedl be provided 1br construction workers 1hal will direct procedures that will take 1z1ace in the event nf an environmental kizard resultin i•om chemicals or fuels that will be on -site during construction. (STAFF COMMEN (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There are no known noises in the area that would a ect the ro'ect. (STAFF COMMENTS (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Shore reran noise svould include construction vehicles small i2mver tools and construction vvorkers, Lon term noised would include personal vehicles and residents o the new units (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Measures to control noise include adhering to the regylated construction hours and maintaininZ the allowable noise decibel levels for residential zones. (STAFF COMMENTS) a"}�pV C4AC,C a� N a� E 0 z c 3 0 F_ m c 0 Ln LO O O an r O N z J d c m E t U 0 r r Q 06 r_ 0 a m r co c 0 E t U R .r r a Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page II of 20 Packet Pg. 434 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the site is detached single fami& residential. To the north east and west are condominium ro'ecfs. To the .south ifs 238't' St SW. The proi2osal will not affect purre►il land uses on nearby or adjacent ro erties because they are developed similar to this proposaL (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? if resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? The proiect site has not been used for workinjZ farmland or workinjZ orest land. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: There are no surrounding working arms or forest lands that will a ect the proposal (STAFF COMMENT C. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing single-family structure on site that is approximated 2,048 square feet in area. There is also a 388 square foot detached garage (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Both structures will be demolished (STAFF COMMENTS) _ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification of the ro er is RM--1.5 (STAFF COMMENTS m E 0 z _ 3 0 H d _ Cn u� 0 0 0 N Z J IL w _ d E t c� a 0 a d <n m E z Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx age 12 of 20 Packet Pg. 435 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current Comprehensive Plum designation of the site is Edmonds Way Corridor. 9. h. k. (STAFF COMMENTS If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Not Applicable (STAFF COMMENTS) at E 0 z c Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. 0 No, there are no critical areas an the property. � (STAFF COMMENTS) 13 ico )0 Prr a�� hnD . 3v &CDC. o O Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? c proximately 15-20 people would reside in the completedgrglect. Z J tL (STAFF COMMENTS) c m E t U 0 Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Q Nobody will be dis laced because the existing house is vacant. 06 le - (STAFF COMMENTS) m Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No measures are proposed because no displacement will occur. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: B • oblainin , desi n revietu board a x•oval andconinlying n,ilh the development standards a 'ihe R&I-Li zane the proposal will be com atlble with existing andprojected land uses and Tans. (STAFF COMMENTS Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 13 of 20 Packet Pg. 436 9. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: No measures are proposed because no impacts to agricultural rind jb►•est lands oL long-term commercial significance are anricipalecl. (STAFF COMMENTS Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Five middle income housing units will be provided by the completed project. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One lower income housinz unit will be eliminated. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: No measw es are prupused because no housing i►npaet.s rrre antic•i reed by creating a new housing unUs. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(S) proposed? The tallest height of anysroposed structure is 281eet. T be primu+y evtc�►•ior +nrrteria!_s_r�f the structures will 6e wood and glass. a� E 0 z c 3 0 F_ m c 0 Ln LO 0 0 rn 0 N z J a c m E t U 0 r r Q 06 r_ 0 a m N r c m E t R .r r a Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 14 of 20 Packet Pg. 437 11 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 7errito►•ial views o the forested propert�liwm adjacent rWerties will be rilter•ed. but Me views are ►►o► regtdalee! nor are theyprotected. (STAFF COMMENTS C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Measures to reduce !m acts include exte►•iar colors and materials that ae similar to and co►>: atible with surrounding uses. Landscaping, w!1l he used to soften the visual !r►rpsrcl r}f the ► ewe structures f roin aWl inhzg properties. Approval of design review will ensure compliance with adoyed design regulations. (STAFF COMMENTS) Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The prQposal mill reduce 1! Irt ghare rani inside !! lrtrn wall IiY_hangy on the exterior o the bttildin all headli hts from cars. The light and glare will generally be during evening/dark hours. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. lighl or gyre f1•om the finished prof ect will not be a salLay hazard or hweijere with views. 6clerior lighting wr'll be directed downwardand will be softened with lerlu►•ed glass to reduce -glare. Headlrghty mill be will enter the prnpertyJi•o►n the 1vul and face Nre garages^Headlights Lro►n the north parking st�crces will be screened bi vegetation. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are no known off -site light sources that will affect the proposal (STAFF COMMENTS) w m E 0 z c 3 0 F- d c Cn u� 0 0 T 0 N Z J IL c d E z c� a 0 a d Cn c m E z v Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 15 of20 Packet Pg. 438 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior li ht sconces will be directed downward and shielded so that light will only be directed toward the walkways and driven :. Headli ht. gLare will be blocked by the garyge doors and ve elation alon the north property line. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Formal recreational a .ortztnities include Madrona School and A1a1ha-Ballin er Park. There are no in orntal recreational opj2ortunities in the immediate vicini (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. Na theprQppwedi•o'ect would not displace an v exislin recreational uses. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: lVrs measures are proposed because no recreation impacts are LxBect_ed as purl vjthe 3-unit development (STAFF COMMENTS) Nrn r SS 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Fw b. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. The existing residence in older than dS vears in awe but the structure is not eligible to be listed on the national state or local pre.yervation re inter becauue the house is in a condition that is not warth.wing and there are no si nd scant architectural features that contribute any historical si ni zcance. (STAFF COMMENTS) Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural m E 0 t c 3 0 F- d c Cn u� 0 0 r 0 N Z J IL c az E t c� a 0 a Cn c m E z Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 16 of20 Packet Pg. 439 importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. There are no known landmark lealure.- or other evidence nl'f►ldiu►2 U►° historic use or oectipation_ of ]he prpperty. There are also no known material evidence o 'arti acts or areas of cultural im orlance on or near the site. No studies were complete. These conclusions are based on research completed as described in item c. below. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. 7'Ix bdmonc& Rt' isler t, Hislo►•ic Places the kllushin ton !n ormation System Ur Arehilectural.Irehaeolo ical Records Data and the National Register o Historic Places were consulted to assess polenlial int pacts 10 eteltaral and historic resources. (STAFF COMMENTS) ff1 J " �,Y) d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. No measures are proposed because no disturbance loss or than e to resources is anlici ated. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project will be served by 238th St SW. Otherpublic streets that will be affected by the ro'ect include SR 104 (Edmonds Way) and Highway 99. To a lesser degree 8th Ave W maybe affected by the project. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is currently served by Community Transit Route 416 which provides bus service between Edmonds and m E 0 t _ 3 0 H d _ rn u� 0 0 0 N Z J IL _ d E z c� a 0 a d !Y 0 Cn m E z Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 17 of 20 Packet Pg. 440 C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? ,41 completion the praieed will have 14 crrki►a > s aces 2 parkin Waves associated with the current sltz le- ainil residence will be eliminated. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Die ru usul duels not rec uire any nesa im rovejngnts to e-visfiiLg oublic or private roads or pedestrian andbivi,cle acilities. f ronfa re improvements, to include a concrete sidewalk were completed in 2018. The access road ahead.X exists. (STAFF COMMEN•r e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will not occur in the immediate vicinity of water. rail, or air transportation. (STAFF COMMENTS) How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The co►ttpleted t7rulect hill generate 28 tied, duilF vehicle trips si,ith app►•oximatel f1 3 ►ribs uccurrin£ in the zI ►1I pea hour and 2 trips in the PA1 peak hour. No truck or commercial trips will he generated 6F 1he residential project TrW generation was produced using the ITE Trip Generation Manual 10ih Edition. (STAFF COMMENT 9. Will the Proposal Intel`fere with, affect or be affected by the miio"vemient of agricultural and 11"rest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. The Zoposal will not inter ire with or a ecl the movement o 'a ricullural and fbrest producis on roads or streets h. in the general area. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ar E O z c 3 O F- 0 0 rn 0 N Z J d rn c m E t U M Q 06 r- O CL m co c d E t U R .r r a Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist docx Page 18 o/20 Packet Pg. 441 The nrouosal will use a joint drivewav to reduce traffic impacts. The nraiect will also nav lrafric milikation fees to assist in construction traffic miti ag tion projects elsewhere in the city. (STAFF COMMENTS) _ I I— M C�- '1 +' - AC A- P-4•S (A)f)-to�i z 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in an increase in residential population which will inherently result in an increase need for public service: At an avergge occupancy a1'3 residents per unit, the proposal will have a net increase of 12 persons to the city'syopulation and approximately 5 students to the school district enrollment. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Payrnem ofsales and real estate lax will pay into the city's general And to help supporipublio services. The owners of each unit will also pay into local taxing district such as Edmonds School District and South County Fire Authority. (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: All uses listed except Lop septic system, are available at the .site. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and Sewer will be providecl by Olympic brew Water & Sewer District. Electricity will be provided by Snohomish Public Ulili(v District. Gar isprovided by Pume1_Sound Enand re use service is provided b Republic Services. bFater and sewer will neecl io be trenched and installed underground and in the ci , ► right of way (STAFF COMMENTS) m E 0 t _ 3 0 F- d _ u� 0 0 C6 QTMM N Z J a w _ d E t n W a 0 a d 0 Cn m E z Q Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 19 of 20 Packet Pg. 442 C. SIGNATURE 1 declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that tic lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. August 28. 2019 Date --Submitted Revised on 9119116 SEPA Checklist.docx Page 20 of 20 Packet Pg. 443 . City Of Edmonds PLN20190055 � 1L�P 0 72.30 144.6 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Legend 0 ReZones PRD RoW Zoning RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 ❑ RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 ■ RM-2.4 ■ RM-1.5 RM-EW BD1 N BD2 N BD3 N BD4 BD5 N OR ® WMU ® BP W BN ® FVMU BC Notes Sunde Townhomes 8629 238th St. SW 6 E O t C O H O C 7 LO LO O O O O N Z J d N C E t V fC r Q 0a r L O Q d W fC C d t V t4 r Q j Packet Pg. 444 1 . City Of Edmonds PLN20190055 { : .8 7 5 A �,00 -00 .. vAl ..# jr �.�... 15 0 UWE MOM=UNffD 1 I C L0 - C _ _ _ _ _- _ YA I. r O U IffC i x a) PROI'rKFA tw r�x a N uvDB J I CUNIr� N am) i .... 0a r L O Q W R IP cd C t V t4 Q 1: 1,12 00 Notes 0 47.02 94.0 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accur WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise relic © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTI Sunde Townhomes 8629 238th St. SW Packet Pg. 445 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 52h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION '"c. 189\) Critical Area Determination (CRA20180087) Based on a review and inspection of the subject site, staff has determined that one or more critical areas are located on or near the site. Critical areas are ecologically sensitive or hazardous areas that are protected in order to maintain their functions and values. Site Location 8629 -- 238th Street SW Tax Account Number 00463300700302 Property Owner TNT LLC Applicant Hannah Philbrick Critical Area(s) Present ❑ Wetlands (ECDC 23.50) ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas (ECDC 23.70) ® Geologically Hazardous Areas (ECDC 23.80) ® Erosion Hazard Areas ❑ Landslide Hazard Areas ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas ❑ Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (ECDC 23.90) ❑ Streams Site Description The subject property is located on the north side of 238th Street SW. Soils on the property are part of the Alderwood urban land complex series according to the Snohomish County soils survey. Slopes along the wester property line slope to the southwest at approximately 15% according to the City LiDAR information. The steepness of the slopes together with the soil classification classifies slopes on the site as erosion hazards pursuant to Chapter 23.80 ECDC. ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 446 What does this mean? The critical area regulations are only triggered when an alteration is proposed to a critical area or its buffer. However, once an alteration in or near critical area is proposed, critical area studies and City review and approval may be required. What is an 'Alteration'? According to Section 23.40.005 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC): "Alteration" means any human-i changes the existing conditions i buffer. Alterations include, but filling; dredging; draining; chann limbing or topping, clearing, relc vegetation; applying herbicides i hazardous or toxic substance; di paving, construction, applicatior surface water management purl activity that changes the existinf hydrology, wildlife or wildlife ha Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager Name, Title Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found at http://www. codepublishing. com/WA/Edmonds Environmentally Critical Areas General Provisions (ECDC 23.40) Wetlands (ECDC 23.50) Frequently Flooded Areas (ECDC 23.70) Geologically Hazardous Areas (ECDC 23.80) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (ECDC 23.90) Building permits — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas (ECDC 19.10) City of Edmonds GIS map tool with approximate location of critical areas: http://Maps.edmondswo.gov Page 12 Packet Pg. 447 Critical Areas Map C RA20180087 8629 - 238th Street SW Scale 1 inch = 25 feet Packet Pg. 448 May 19, 2020 Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Development Services Department Planning Division City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Sunde Townhomes Design Review Application (PLN20190055) 8629 238th St SW Response to Request for Additional Information Michele, Please accept this letter and attached documents as part of our resubmittal for the Sunde Townhomes. The narrative below is to provide detail on the corrections that were made and are in response your corrections of November 21, 2019. Planning Division Comments 1. Height & Elevation a. The Height and Elevation calculations have been reviewed and revised where necessary as described below. b. The height rectangle for the triplex has been revised to encompass the south bump out. The duplex has not been revised since the bump out has been removed in response to an additional comment discussed below. As a result, the rectangle corner elevations have changed, and the existing average grade has been revised for each structure. These elevation changes have been reflected on the revised Site Plan (Sheet A. 1). c. The structure elevation drawings, Sheet 1 for each structure, has been revised to change the average grade elevation for each structure, to note the maximum allowed building height, the proposed building height, and the allowable 5' increase for roofs that have a pitch of 4:12 or greater. 2. Site Plan a. As requested, the Site Plan has been revised so that the bump out on the triplex is the same line weight and type as the rest of the structure, and the eave line has been labeled on each structure. The eave line has been revised on the duplex with the removal of the second story bum out. 3. Setbacks a. The bumpout on the north side of the duplex has been removed. b. As noted on Grading Plan C3.1 the maximum height of the proposed rockery is 3'. The top and toe elevations from C3.1 have been added to the Site Plan. 4. Lot Coverage a. The lot coverage for the triplex has been corrected and the total lot coverage has been revised accordingly. 5. Landscaping a. Type III i. Type III Landscaping has been provided on three of the four perimeter property lines. The west property line provides access to each of the proposed units. ii. The eastern property line proposed vegetation has been revised to include the trees to be retained and supplemental vegetation to meet the intent of Type III landscape buffer. iii. The Landscape Plan has been revised to indicate the trees to be retained. iv. The current site plan does not show the referenced Lot Line Adjustment because deeds for the individual properties were not prepared or recorded. ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 449 6. Rockeries a. Rockeries are being proposed and not retaining walls. b. Review of ECDC 18.40.020 has been completed and no prohibited rockeries were identified in the proposal. c. The Site Plan and Landscape Plan has been revised to reflect the rockeries proposed on the grading plan. 7. Parking a. The project requires 9 parking stalls per ECDC 17.50.020 (1.8 stalls per unit). Five parking stalls are located in each of the 5 garages (#3, 4, 6, 8, 9). The garage has a clearance depth of 19.4 feet from garage door to the bollards protecting the water heater & furnace and a clearance width of 11 feet. Stalls 1 and 2 are long the north property line and have combined dimensions of 17' wide (8.5' X 2) and 16.5' deep. Stall 5 is located between units C and D and measures 8'5' wide by 16.6' deep. Stall 7 is located between units C and B and measures 8'5' wide by 16.6' deep. The PS symbol identifies the 9 stalls required by the ECDC. The remaining 5 stalls are in excess of the required off -site parking and therefore can be in tandem per ECDC 18.95.030. The tandem stalls would not impede access to the required parking in the garage because the stalls in tandem are in common ownership nor would they pose a safety hazard. b. Each required parking stall (1 through 9) meet minimum parking dimensions as described above. c. The remaining 5 stalls in the driveways are 8 feet in width, because the required parking is provided in other locations. 8. General Notes. a. The current site plan does not show the referenced Lot Line Adjustment because deeds for the individual properties were not prepared or recorded. Following city approval of the Lot Line Adjustment, the two parties could not come to an agreeable purchase price, so the Lot Line Adjustment never was memorialized with the transfer deeds. The property lines are as they were pre -approval of the Lot Line Adjustment. b. Attached for your records is the correspondence from Olympic View Water & Sewer District acknowledging the project. A project file number is still pending and will be provided tomorrow per Marty Henninger, OVWSD Public Works Recycling Coordinator Thirteen square feet of container storage space is provided in between the parking area and the hot water tank and furnace, shown with three waste/recycling bins, each being a 32 gallon tote. Stormwater Comments As noted, the stormwater review comments will be addressed with the Building Permit (BLD20190909) when submitted, following approval of the Design Review. Fire Department Comments As noted, the fire review comments will be addressed with the Building Permit. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 830-1046 or lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com. Sincerely, Puget Sound Planning ee A. Michaelis, AICP 5005 2001h Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 450 Lee Michaelis From: Lynne Danielson <Lynned@ovwater.com> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:18 PM To: Lee Michaelis Cc: Marty Henninger Subject: RE: 8629 238th St SW (Sunde Townhomes) Lee, I have forwarded this to Marty. He can start a Short Plat File for you and give you the appropriate number that Edmonds is needing. We will also include a preliminary fee sheet for the facility and meter charges. Lynne Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Lee Michaelis Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:10 PM To: Lynne Danielson Subject: 8629 238th St SW (Sunde Townhomes) Hi Lynne, We have made application to the City of Edmonds for a 5 unit project on 238t" St SW. As part of their list of comments, they are requesting confirmation that OVWSD has been notified of the project. Does the district have a standard availability certificate that needs to be filled out and returned. I am attaching the Water & Sewer Plan that was prepared for our Design Review Project, for your reference. Your guidance would be much appreciated. �'" Lee A. Michaelis, AICP I$*p Principal, Land Use Consultant Puget Sound Planning ufi3� mobile: 425.830.1046 :vow° address:5005 200th St SW, Suite 101-B, Lynnwood, WA 98036 web: www.pugetsoundplanning.com as E 0 z c 3 0 F- m c 3 LO LO O O M r O N Z J d Packet Pg. 451 April 19, 2021 Michele Q. Szafran, Planner Development Services Department Planning Division City of Edmonds 121 5t" Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Sunde Townhomes Design Review Application (PLN20190055) 8629 2381" St SW Response to 3rd Request for Additional Information Michele, Please accept this letter and attached documents as part of our resubmittal for the Sunde Townhomes. The narrative below is to provide detail on the corrections that were made and are in response your corrections of January 20, 2021. Planning Division Comments 1. Height & Elevation: ADDRESSED 2. Site Plan: ADDRESSED 3. Setbacks: ADDRESSED 4. Lot Coverage: ADDRESSED 5. Landscaping a. Type III Landscaping i. NEEDED. Please revisit Type III landscaping based on the current boundary line location for the western property boundary. Parking and driveways are proposed along the western property boundary, however, please see if some form of landscaping can be provided to enhance the western property boundary. RESPONSE: Please see the revised Landscape Plan for landscaping in between the driveways and the request to modify the landscape requirements. ii. ADRESSED. iii. ADDRESSED. iv. NEEDED. Needs to be revisited based on the 2006 LLA. Please provide some type of landscaping between the driveways. RESPONSE: Rhododendron Mrs. Furnival shrubs and Vinca minor (periwinkle) live ground cover are being proposed in between the driveways to each unit. _ I� ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 452 v. ADDRESSED vi. Sheet C3.1 shows a detention pipe in the vicinity of the proposed landscaping along the street frontage off 238th St. SW as depicted on sheet L-1, please have the landscape architect address how the landscaping will coordinate with the civil plan. RESPONSE: The Landscape Plan has been revised to take into consideration the proposed stormwater detention tank. b. Deviation from Landscape Standards i. NEEDED. Please revisit for the western property boundary landscaping and address the comment below. NOVEMBER 21, 2019: ECDC 20.13.000 allows the Architectural Design Board to interpret and modify the landscaping requirements of ECDC 20.13; provided the modification is consistent with the purposes found in ECDC 20.10.000. If the project proposes modifications of the landscaping requirements detailed in ECDC 20.13, please identify the proposed modifications and demonstrate how the proposed modifications are consistent with ECDC 20.10.000. RESPONSE: Please see response to 5.a.iv above and the Request for Landscape Modification attached to this response letter. 6. Rockeries: ADDRESSED 7. Parking: ADDRESSED 8. General Notes. d. Please provide a color sample for the proposed duplex and triplex. RESPONSE: Enclosed you will find two paint chips. The Macadamia Paint Sample (Sherwin Williams 6142) will be used on the body of each structure. The Stone Lion Paint Sample (Sherwin Williams 7507) will be used for the trim. Public Works Recycling Coordinator ADDRESSED. General Engineering Division Comments ADDRESSED, Stormwater Engineer Comments NOTHING FURTHER Fire Department Comments NOTHING FURTHER If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 830-1046 or lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com. Sincerely, Puget Sound Planning Lee A. Michaelis, AICP Principal Planner 5005 2001h Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 453 Sunde Townhomes Design Review Application (PLN20190055) Landscape Modification to Type III Landscaping of West Property Line The City of Edmonds Architectural Design Review Board may interpret and modify the landscape requirements of ECDC 20.13 if it is found that the modification is consistent with the Purpose Statements of Design Review found in ECDC 20.10.000. The following narrative are our findings that conclude the proposal may be modified and can be found to be consistent with the purpose of design review. Modification requested: The landscape modification being requested to eliminate the three trees within the Type III landscape buffer and to allow 390 square feet of shrubs and groundcover to buffer the access to the project. ECDC states the following as Purposes of Design Review. Following each purpose statement is a narrative on how the statement applies to this project and how the proposed landscape along the western boundary line meets the purpose statement. "20.10.O00.A To encourage the realization and conservation of a desirable and aesthetic environment in the city of Edmonds:" The western property line abuts a private access easement that provides access to each of the five townhouse units. West of that are the Royale Villa Condominiums. For Site Design purposes the access easement serves as extension of the project and buffering is best served between the access easement and the condominiums to the west. Currently there is mature vegetation between the access easement and the condominiums that meet the intent of the Type III landscape buffer between uses. Overall, the landscape design proposes Type III landscaping along the north, south and east boundary lines, along with the mature landscaping west of the access easement. This design meets the intent of Type III landscaping and assist in achieving a desirable and aesthetic environment within the city. The landscape modification to reduce the Type III landscape buffering along the west property line is warranted because the design intent can be achieved with a combination of off - site screen in and the proposed landscape. "20.10.O00.13 B. To encourage and promote development which features amenities and excellence in the form of variations of siting, types of structures and adaptation to and conservation of topography and other natural features;" The proposed development is 5 townhouse units comprised of two separate buildings: a triplex and a duplex. The types of structures are permitted within the RM-1.5 zone. The siting of the two buildings takes into consideration existing driveway access and to limit additional turning movements along 238th St SW. The project will be utilizing an existing driveway and removing the existing curb cut providing direct access to 238th St SW. By removing this curb cut, turning movements from and on to 238th St SW are restricted, reducing the potential of vehicle conflicts with existing traffic and pedestrians. This siting also facilitates public transit by removing the curb cut east of the bus stop on the frontage of the property. Utilizing the existing access easement also allows the placement of the buildings so that they can be terraced follow the existing topography of the site. Due to the siting discussed above, the access to each unit is restricted to the west property line and prohibiting full compliance with the Type II landscaping. The proposed landscaping is the maximum amount of landscaping that can be provided, while reducing impacts to public right of way and adjacent properties. 5005 200th Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 454 "20.10.000.0 To encourage creative approaches to the use of land and related physical developments;" For the reasons referenced in Subsection B on the previous page, the development of this property takes into consideration the topography of the land, by terracing the buildings along the existing topography. The property will not have direct access to 238th St SW taken into account the existing bus stop reducing potential conflicts in vehicular turning movements. This approach restricts the access to the property to the existing private access easement causing the need for the landscape modification. With the existing mature vegetation off -site and the proposed landscaping, the modification is warranted. "20.10.000.D. To encourage the enhancement and preservation of land or building of unique or outstanding scenic or historical significance;" This purpose statement is not relevant to the subject property or proposed buildings. "20.10.000.E To minimize incompatible and unsightly surroundings and visual blight which prevent orderly community development and reduce community property values." As referenced in other subsections above and noted on the plan set cover sheet. The property abuts residential uses north and south of the subject property, which are compatible uses. These property lines are screened with Type II landscaping in compliance with the landscape regulations. 238th St SW abuts the property to the south. The south building elevation will be screened from the public right of way by a combination of existing vegetation in the right of way and landscaping along the south property line of the subject property. The vegetation will also screen the residence from vehicle traffic on 238th St SW. To the west of the subject property is the access easement and residential uses beyond that. The condominiums are considered compatible uses. The condominiums will be screened from the proposed project by the existing vegetation on the west side of the access easement. The proposed landscaping of two trees, shrubs, and living groundcover will further soften the proposed driveways and the proposed building elevations. The combination of existing and proposed vegetation warrants the approval of the landscape modification. 5005 200th Street Southwest, Suite 101-B I Lynnwood, WA 98036 www.pugetsoundplanning.com I info@pugetsoundplanning.com 1 (425) 830-1046 Packet Pg. 455 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-unit multi -family development with associated parking. The 5 units are proposed to be divided between two structures, a duplex and a triplex, and each unit will contain 2-bedrooms. Each unit will contain a parking garage for one parking space and additional surface parking has been provided along the western property boundary. Access to the proposed development will be taken off of 238t" St. SW. The existing residence and improvements at the site will be removed. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III-B decisions. The site is located within the RM-1.5 zone. PROJECT LOCATION: 8629 238t" St. SW., Edmonds, WA, Tax Parcel Number 00463300700302 NAME OF APPLICANT/ CONTACT: Thor Sunde / Lee A. Michaelis, Puget Sound Planning FILE NO.: PLN2019-0055 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httr)s://www.edmondswa.eov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2019-0055, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. Due to COVID-19, a virtual public hearing will be held by the Architectural Design Board on June 2, 2021 at 7 p.m. Join the Zoom meeting at: https://zoom.us/I/95360544929?pwd=ZmdOREFORkE3RkRaeVdBRmpkNUxMZz 09 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 953 6054 4929 Password: 818962 CITY CONTACT: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner / Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: May 19, 2021 ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 456 -n E 0 -C 0 00 m a, O C m 10 oyv- Poll CO E 0 ro t2 L CD CM 0 ik* (D E cc 0 q Lc L cc, Packet tPg457 FILE NO.: PLN2019-0055 Applicant: Thor Sunde DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 19th day of May, 2021, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Michele Q. Szafran, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 19th day of May, 2021, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: r �' {BFP747893. DOC;1 \00006.90000 W Packet Pg. 458 CITY OF EDMONDS - PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM ❑ PW-Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ PW - Maintenance 8 Building Project Number: Applicant's Name: Property Location: PLN20190055 SUNDE TOWNHOMES / THOR SUNDE 8629 238TH ST SW Date Application Received: 10.15.19 Date Application Routed: 10.18.19 Zoning: RM-1.5 (MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) Project Description: FIVE -UNIT TOWNHOMES If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MICHELE SZAFRAN Name of Individual Submitting Comments: LEIF BJORBACK Ext. 1778 Title: BUILDING OFFICIAL Date: 11/6/19 8 I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and I do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 459 OF EDP 0 Updated: Jan 2018 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on -site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25' of a fire department connection. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet; outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn -around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 12%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words "FIRE LANE — NO PARKING." Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12" high, 2" stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18" high x 12" wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48" to 60" above grade. c) Style: Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50' between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10) Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102.7,102.8 and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety -related requirements. 0 3 0 a� 3 LO LO 0 0 M 0 N Z J d U) a� E U 0 a 06 1` 0 a a� a� E 0 a ATTACHMEN Packet Pg. 460 1 MEMORANDUM November 4, 2019 TO: Michelle Szafran, Associate Planner FROM: Steve Fisher, City of Edmonds Public Works, 425-771-0235, steve.fisher@edmondswa.gov RE: Plan review of trash storage PLN2019-0055 — Sunde Townhomes, 8629 238tb St. SW, Edmonds A trash enclosure is not required for this project. However, space must be indicated in each garage for storage of individual waste containers. The minimum footprint shall be 13 square feet. ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 461 Date: To: From: Subject MEMORANDUM May 14, 2021 Michele Szafran, Planning Jeanie McConnell, Engineering PLN2019-0055 — Design Review Sunde Townhomes — 8629 238Ih St SW Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with any future building permit application for development on the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. The City's stormwater engineer provided project feasibility approval based on the civil plan set received on December 15, 2020. The applicant provided a revised civil plan set on April 27, 2021 and it has been confirmed that the minor revision (sidewalk widening for bus stop) does not change the previous feasibility approval. The subject property benefits from an ingress, egress, and utilities easement (AFN200701050551). Thank you. ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 462 From: Fir Grove To: Szafran, Michele Subject: Application File #PLN20190055 Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 9:10:35 AM From: Fir Grove <firgrovecondos@gmail.com> Date: December 2, 2019 at 8:57:39 AM PST To: michelle.szaran@edmondswa.gov Cc: Fir Grove <firgrovecondos@gmail.com> Subject: Application File #PLN20190055 Attention Michelle, I represent the townhome development that is directly north of Thor Sundes' property that has proposed 5 unit duplex and triplex. In the drawing it indicates that their driveways would be accessed from our driveway/property. We have not agreed to this proposal as it would require our permission for an easement. Please advise Sincerely Paul Paul Svenkerud Fir Grove HOA Secretary ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 463