Loading...
7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR redacted (2)iiiiiiiiiiiiii 12705 7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR AI) DRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 37 C6 `6)1- COT C0 -g6 , 3705 •001.010 ' 0Q -(- coo ' /O(D ' o 1 (� BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS : 1g`"f 4 — jg7 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:��� DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: L G� PERMITS (OTHER): 0 PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: LID #: LOT: CA SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: �� IAVI f/ `� I I► U SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: I D I t BLOCK: l.ATEMP\DST's\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc 4190 City of Edmonds, Critica* r r e- a - s'' '�-"Che"" d" Mist ::.: The Critical Areas Checklist contained an and,submitt it. to the City.. lue City will this form is to'be 65'6d 64 by any person review the dwkgst, make a precursory site preparing 'a Development Permit visit, �and .make adetermination of the Application for the City of Ednx" prior: ."sub;equeat - steps necessary to complete a to his/her submittalof a dcvckpment-:----- development permit applicatim permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine VAIethcr any potential Critical Areas are or may be present an the sutqectVWpCrtY., The information needed to complete the . Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, nap. or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must M out the checklist, sign and date it, With a signed copy of this form, the 2PPlicad should also submit a vicinity map - or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject puw(s)' , In addition, the applicant shall include Other pertinent information (er, site P1414 topography map,' etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Chedkffist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. - . I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest'that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my. knowledge (fin out the appropriate column blow). Owner / Applicant: -YA " Z. Nam 77©4 pLyMplc V/ C-Wp -pp. Street Addv= f Ph4e3w 0S W-A. City. State. ZIP Phone Signature Date Appricant Representative: V6 15 e- tZT E., 'Yo u N 6 Name 14s-3-3 Sbed Ad&ew i4LE .363 6611- City. State, ZIP TO Phone Signature Date Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)- J. Site Address/Location: �%%CAA-©! YhM rl G VIEW pa 3700- not- or o-00•-©5 2. Property Tax Account Number: 3 ? o $ - 001- o 09 -00-oc* - P 43 4tv - 0oo -4 ono -o t - o7 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 1 %i, 3 4 2 :SQ , 4. Is this site currently developed? _ ✓ res; ✓no - If yes; how is site developed? 2 g2�I tT l hl * �565 S. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply - Mat:• less than 54W elevation change over entire site, V V. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). •� Hdly: slopes present on site of more than-15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet)- Steep:. grades of gr4cater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33fieet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. o N D ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ni O ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? S. Site is in the floodway NO floodplain 1'V'D of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? — Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? )- 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow shrubs ; mixed ; urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: IVY ;•For>+Oity.Statt'Use Oaly As 12 > map iod soil lypo(s)? I.�cr was L 9✓`� Ale � 3>z�0MA tory-eO� A. inap jcaceswdiand-present ogsite�• �f i 64�1 J�A`reas �ngeat�iy or C.{:map indicates Ccitical'Area:op site?. �5�,�> Wiz: . •eS. r ;win dGSl tbd iCatfil SltbSldetlOC 18tldSirdC llaidrd �PCa? a .>,J,Y , s' >\S k � < \� isoQa "M t � ` r - P t f f T re, LD r' �� � c� I �1 �0508 f il/ «l f��ottc- T f ExkS'rI5 w6TL fl tLOPOS� 2E�oCAT- v�u Yh j a Q '�( !'1 I tiV w - 6r.+3 L-oc iv►a o� sew�R �rur3 C. o w m T _._fin - L f�7 LO 6.4 TIP uj 9,--;oe IVccuj M, 10 U. LAJ I VtA-0 O °ar 60TH STREETS. t 1- y`. ..... ... . t -00- OFFSET FRAME GRATE SO THAT RESTRICTOR/POLLUTION DEVICE IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER THE LADDER--i . STD. Dr tTERTI qln Br.: GAT W GRATE ELEVATION CHAIN - 201 SLACK WhEN WELD CIIA I N / �^ 0. 5' MIN. ��,� • OVERFLOW I SET TO Pit( DETENT10h 'ar.'. \ i OIL'SE.PAW TECTION OVERFLOW PIPE & OL HAVE CAPACITY ,I LET. I MUST GREATER I i.At11f INLET SY� OUTLET F s MINIMUM ZUVATXON-� MIN[ RE=ICTOR-PLATES - 21 MIN. PUT Z: NOT -'=U7R.v.D'1F S YSTEM: -pbuuri �O 0 �N�.:... CaFTWL m y :NOTE - A LL'METAL. SURFACES MUST BE. I I .-CATCU..-'aA31 CORROSION RESISTA ..."011- GALVANIZED. C .EROSION.:PROTECTIC SURED. 'R E( AS Nq� IC7 RAPOLLUTIWI E P (.6I-ROL' DEWCE/CATCH BASIN PASCADE C P. 0., Box DETAIL Arlina-Lon, Wi or. g• Dn1't:. S - I _ gp 111:"10 TO fiuilding Divi.sfol Con,munit,y Ucvelol)menL -DcpartmcnL FROM; Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: After review of -the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: rP vlAL4i . 1,4 i r'U iic 'forks 7/'o -7 L6 mm --re FLDV) kl�" Z. P,42 V-- j,q 3 1 LP OL(-We- '-- . vir-1-4 O/Z - RECEMED SEP 1980 c t2bS -,SUTioA✓ poet Dir. Of Public Works 71� L.L-. aS�'Rn�� /�2EA CmIv&;'Z 7v 13C PtACC-AP FLow I2C--CTtZ(C--(012- AS 51fvwf,,-) Ao-Aj r /i STREET FiLt* CITY OF E®M®N®S 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS September 5, 1980 Mr. Han Park 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 FILE COPY HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Dear 'Mr. Park: SUBJECT: DRAINAGE &••FILL'PLAN FOR 18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE The material received.by our office on.September 4, 1980, (copy attached) -does not.constitute an engineered plan as required in our memo of August 19, 1980. The engineered plan must be prepared by a registered, civil engineer. We suggest your engineer contact us for details regarding plan requirements. If you have questions, please address written correspondence to our office, attention Bob Franklin. Sincerely, JAM: ADAMS P.E. City Engineer RRF: jky Attachment BOB FRANKL N DT. 0 WATER SelkVice Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO_ ----------------------------- - ............. NEW CONSTRUCTION Ej REPAIRS X LID NO_ ------------------ ASMT. NO. ------------------ OWNER. ------ HAq4 ---- PArkK- -------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR ---------- PERMIT NO.%30YJ7 JOB ADDRESS .1.7c)-4 ------ a-L-im-pic --- r--M -ew .... lD-RtmF— LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO_ --------------------------------------- BLOCK NO- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LLJ NAMEOF ADDITION --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 07704 oujmPic. virrw Dit. 14! - I , 1 V'cappvk To 1"PLASTIC I-S'DEEP 0 V Bags — $'CEP ccrpea COMM. To < KeTER Se rMIR 1"SupertLom 160P.S.I.Poly PIPE III Z'DECP COPPER COMM-TO APR-01c - VVEE P PLASric WIT14 TRACER WjqF to 6RAS5 SPLICE i z 0 T I C T Approved: 151993 ------- By '14,e ------ W .......................... W-0001-1 1/75 (REV.1 1/78) DATE i4jJ ..... • ��' ��N� 0� J,rg�� ie � lam-` STREET IL PLOT PLAN n TQAcT tog, SEA v tt= w -T R,4C^"s EXM�T TO lil- po2Tt v/u "T CA t Z' CITY OF EDMOND S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - 7110 — 210T" ST. S.W. EDMONDS, WA 98026 (425) 771-0235 FAX (425) 744-6057 WEBSITE: www.cLedmonds.wa.us VIA U.S. MAIL April 17, 2008 Mr. Han Z. Park 7704 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Confiscation of Sewer Line Dear Mr. Park: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR In response to your concerns in your letter dated April 5, 2008, The City of Edmonds has not performed any work on your property along the west side of Olympic View Drive. To my knowledge, all repair work was performed on publicly owned utility systems within the street right-of-way on Olympic View Drive. If you wish to discuss this matter further, please call the Public Works Office at 425-771- 0235 to arrange a meeting. Also, it would be helpful if you provided a map showing the utility systems in question. Sincerely, w Noel F. Miller, P.E. Public Works Director cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Street Address File • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City / Hekinan, Japan April 5, 2008 Director, Public Works City of Edmonds 12.1 50` Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 08020 Dear sir: We failed to receive any correspondence regarding the APR 0 4 2008 PUBLIC-0Qrj,cS [jr'pj ` Confistication of a sewer line located in our property by City of Edmonds" As we were promised to be resolved at construction site.on Olympic View Drive in December of 2007 by city officials. Apparently you folks were aware of the problem as expressed in the conversation at the site. You have destroyed -a concrete barrier/dam for flood surge and connected your line to our personal catch basins at both ends of our line without consultation or. authorization. As we understand the sewer line is not located within the easement described on Deed of Trust or ay other legal document: As -the record show, there is a breach of title as the research by Title Insurance company indicted -some time ago, which show there was no change/addition .in the description of easement and complaint was.placed to a city official for this matter. There was no response from the City of Edmonds, and would like to resolve this matter. We would like to receive all the document (s) regarding the connection of public sewer to , and use of our private catch basin and sewer line in your record as soon as possible. Upon receiving the document, we will proceed the resolution, of this matter: Thanks, r an Z. Par . 7104 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA CC" To whom it may concern STREET ADDRESS BILE CITY OF E D M O N D S GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 7110 — 210TH ST. S.W. • EDMONDS, WA 98026 (425) 771.0235 • FAX (425) 744.6057 • WEB SITE: www.cLedmonds.wa.us VIA U.S. MAIL May 7, 2008 Mr. Han Z. Park 7704 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Request for Public Records Dear Mr. Park: 1 am in receipt of your most recent letters of April l 8th, 21st and May 3rd, providing follow up information, clarification and requests. Until I received your letter of April 5th, neither the City Clerk's office nor the Public Works Department were aware of or had any record that you had previously made a formal request for public records regarding the "Confiscation of a sewer line located in our property by the City of Edmonds". We are currently in the process of gathering any and all City records that pertain to this request. It appears that there is a history, since the 1960's, of City utilities in existence on your property. Therefore, I estimate that the City will need an additional thirty (30) days to research and gather the records that you have requested. Your requests are not clear but we understand you to be requesting the following categories of records: Utility easements, survey maps and engineering drawings regarding the installation of City utility pipelines located in Lots 9 and 12 of Block 1 of the property you own between 80th Avenue W. and Olympic View Drive. 2. Any written correspondence regarding the installation of said utilities. 3. Any applicable City codes associated with the construction of said utilities. If this interpretation of your request is not correct, please advise me in writing at your earliest opportunity. We will proceed to gather the records noted above and we anticipate that the records will be ready for your review no later than June 6, 2006. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Thank you for your patience and please let me know if you need any further information or have any questions. Sincerely, Noel F. Miller, P.E. Director, Public Works cc: Scott Snyder, Esq., City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk APPLICATION The City. Of Edmonds for SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO- ...................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . ...................ASMT. NO. .................. O'W`NER RT NlEY1=P�.-•-••----------------------- ------ CONTRACTOR S - M- c01.... PERMIT NO. c- JOB ADDRESS .... ie>7-__1�'_-..--�IYkApic -/IE.W pf?IV�LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. _-___--_-_ � ---------- BLOCK NO.------•----1------•-------------•- u -j - n --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF ADDITION ------ 0� r,m p LTY L�GR,------------- cv Ya� ffl z3sA�ep 44PV�.� Srtr 6 .d Op�p '11. A ed PF— / DATE ------ - B......... , } i,' ...... APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No . .......................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ OWNER ---- /� B-T ... M ... IFY!.--.g --------............................................. CONTRACTOR -- /5.........PERMIT No. ADDRESS 0 ------------------ .................... BLOCK No. ADDR ..... . ......... ......... ............ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT N . ..... .Y .... ......................................... %NAME OF ADDITION 1c'—FAV>rVl j /7) P+ —/j 7 c- ........................................ ......................... ..................................... ...... ............. . ...... 0 a: Approved: DATE .......... ............. By ...................................................................... CITY OF EDMONDS _ 121 Sth AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website:.www.d.edmonds.wa. us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 7p'0're a41t1fi"V November 22, 2011 Mr. Han Park 7704 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98026 Re: A. Your request for elimination of dual address at 7704 Olympic View Dr. B. Confirmation of Zip Code at 18408 79th Ave W MIKE COOPER MAYOR Mr. Park, In reference to your requests, I will notify Snohomish County on the correct zip code at 18408 79th Ave W to be 98026. You are correct that they have it listed currently as 98020. 1 will send you a copy of the letter to Snohomish County upon making this requested change to the zip code. Regarding your address�at 7704 Olympic View Drive, we are showing that to be your correct address and the address that should remain. I have sent you a copy of the current Snohomish County Parcel Property summary and they are showing 7704 Olympic View Drive as property address and mailing address. There was a letter sent to you in 1989 referencing the address of 7704 Olympic View Drive to be the correct address concurred by the Building and Fire Department. Sincerely, Linda Thornq uist Permit Specialist City of Edmonds Encl • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan •1 Property Summary Pagel of 2 Snohomish Onlino Govornmont Information & Sorvicos County *tA Washington Printable Version Home _ Other Prop erty_Data Help Search Results > Property Summary Property Account Summary Parcel Number 100370800100900 Property Address 17704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS, WA 98026 Parties - For changes use 'Other Property Data' menu Role Percent Name IMailing Address Taxpayer I 100 PARK HAN Z & REGINA K 17704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS, WA 98026 United States Owner I 100 PARK HAN Z & REGINA K 17704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS, WA 98026 United States General Information Property Description JADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 001 D-00 - LOT 9 Property Category Land and Improvements Status jActive, Locally Assessed Tax Code Area 100217 Propeft Characteristics Use Code 1111 Single Family Residence - Detached Unit of Measure Acre(s) Size (gross) 11.01 Related Properties No Values Found Cove Exemptions No Exemptions Found No Taxes Owed at this Time. No Charges are currently due. No Charge Amounts can be reported because no taxes are due for the year this application is processing. No Charge Amounts are due for this property. If you believe this is incorrect, please contact a Property Support Specialist. Statement of Payable/Paid For Tax Year: 2011 Distribution of Current Taxes District Rate Amount CITY OF EDMONDS 0.145721 58.97 CITY OF EDMONDS 1.976632 799.94 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 15 4.149544 1,679.32 PUB HOSP #2 0.057643 23.33 PUB HOSP #2 0.095378 38.60 SNO-ISLE INTERCOUNTY RURAL LIBRARY 0.450643 182.38 SNOHOMISH COUNTY-CNT 0.868378 351.43 STATE 2.206383 892.92 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5.05 TOTALS 9.950324 4,031.94 Pending Property Values Pending Tax Yea Market Land Value Market Improvement Value Market Total Value Current Use Land Value Current Use Improvement Current Use Total Value 20121 163,60OF 186,8001 350,4001 01 01 0 Property Values Value Type Tax Year 2011 Tax Year 2010 Tax Year 2009 Tax Year 2008 Tax Year 2007 Taxable Value Regular 404,700 555,700 668,000 687,200 622,600 Exemption Amount Regular Market Total 404,700 555,700 668,000 687,200 622,600 Assessed Value 404,700 555,700 668,000 687,200 622,600 Market Land 214,500 460,600 563,600 575,700 431,800 Market Improvement 190,2001 95,1001 104,4001 111,5001 190,800 Personal Property Levy Rate History Tax Year Total Levy Rate 2010 8.756094 2009 8.106606 2008 7.915752 Real Property Structures Description IType I Year Built More Information Split Entry IDwelling I 1976 View Detailed Structure Information https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(c35hw5ushjlvvfbsazonx245)/result.aspx 11/16/2011 Property Summary Page 2 of 2 I I Oropertv Sales since 7 31 1999 Transfer Date Receipt DateI Sales Price Excise Number IDeed Type lGrantor (Seller) lGrantee (Buyer) 10ther Parcels Pro a Ma s Nei hborhood Code ownship IRange ISection lQuarter IParcel Map 1504000 27 104 18' INE View parcel mans far this Township/RanaelSection Receipts Date Receipt No. Amount Applied 10/27/2011 10:00 6371572 2,015.97 05/02/2011 14:45. 6153738 2,015.97 10/26/2010 13:38 5773377 2,435.41 04/27/2010 16:08 5579100 2,435.40 10/19/2009 00:00 5174755 2,707.61 05/05/2009 10: 32 5119729 2,707.60 10/28/2008 00:00 4758120 2,719.86 04/29/2008 00:00 4558321 2,719.85 10/16/2007 00:00 4148486 2,764.24 04/18/2007 00:00 3901645 2,764.23 10/25/2006 00:00 3682334 2,473.01 04/22 /2006 00:00 3378266 2,473.01 Events Effective Date Entry Date -Time ype Remarks 11/14/2007 11/14/2007 15:37 IThe situs address has. changed I by sasjra Printable Version Developed by Manatron, Inc. @2005-2010 All rights reserved, Version 1.0.4043.25450 https://www. snoco. org/proptax/(c35hw5ushj lvvfbsazonx245)/result. aspx 11/16/2011 Property Summary Pagel of 2 Snohomish �� CQ Onlino Governmont Information 8 Services County ( Washington C�() /lL� Printable Version � � Hoene Other Property Data Help Property Search > Search Results > Property Summary Property Account Summary Parcel Number 100370800101000 1 Property Address 118408 79TH AVE W , EDMONDS, WA 98020 Parties -For changes use 'Other Property Data'. menu Role Percent Name Mailing Address Taxpayer 100 PARK HAN & REGINA 17704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS, WA 98026 United States Owner 100 1 PARK HAN & REGINA 17704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS, WA 98026 United States General Information Property Description ADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 001 D-00 - LOT 10 Property Category Land and Improvements Status Active, Locally Assessed Tax Code Area 00217 PropertyOroperty Characteristics Use Code 1111 Single Family Residence - Detached Size (gross) 10.64 Related Properties No Values Found etive Exemptions No Exemptions Found No Taxes Owed at this Time. No Charges are currently due. No Charge Amounts can be reported because no taxes are due for the year this application is processing. No Charge Amounts are due for this property. If you believe this is Incorrect, please contact a Property Support Specialist. Statement of Payable/Paid For Tax Year: .2011 1 Distribution of Current Taxes District Rate Amount CITY OF EDMONDS 0.145721 32.54 CITY OF EDMONDS 1.976632 441.38 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 15 4.149544 926.59 PUB HOSP #2 0.057643 12.87 PUB HOSP #2 0.095378 21.30 SNO-ISLE INTERCOUNTY RURAL LIBRARY 0.450643 100.63 SNOHOMISH COUNTY-CNT 0.868378 193.91 STATE 2.206383 492.69 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5.03 TOTALS 9.950324 2,226.94 Pendin Pro a Values Pending Tax Year Market Land Value Market Improvement Value Market Total Value Current Use Land Value Current Umvomrrent Use Total Value 20121 163,4001 01 163,400101 0 0 Property Values Value Type Tax Year 2011 Tax Year 2010 Tax Year 2009 Tax Year 2008 Tax Year 2007 Taxable Value Regular 223,300 346,500 444,700 457,000 387,200 Exemption Amount Regular Market Total 223,300 346,500 444,700 457,000 387,200 Assessed Value 223,300 346,500 444,700 457,000 387,200 Market Land 223,3001 313,500 1386,002 394,300 332,500 Market Improvement 0 33,000 58,700 62,700 54,700 Personal Property Levy Rate History Tax Year Total Levy Rate 2010 8.756094 2009 8.106606 2008 7.915752 teal Property Structures iescription ype Year Built More Information a https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(3kewibugeecfiy55rpwl5z45)/result.aspx 11/22/2011 Property Summary -01 Page 2 of 2 jProperty Maps Neighborhood Code ITownship IRange Isection lQuarter IParcel Map 1504000 127 104 118 INE lView parcel maps for this Towns hio/Range/Section Receipts Date Receipt No. Amount Applied 10/27/2011 10:00 6371572 1,113.47 05/02/2011 14:46 6153739 1,113.47 10/27/2010 00:00 5804021 1,426.70 04/27/2010 00:00 5544175 1,612.32 10/28/2009 00:00 5276481 1,802.51 04/24/2009 00:00 4986554 1,802.50 10/27/2008 00:00 4743183 1,808.75 04/24/2008 00:00 4453834 1,808.75 05/14/2007 09:32 4104997 1,719.10 04/26/2007 00:00 3970175 1,719.10 11/01/2006 00:00 3719735 1,398.86 05/01/2006 00:00 13434663 1,398.86 Events Effective Date Entry Date -Time Type Remarks 04/22/2011 04/22/2011 14:53 Tax Bill Recalculation Destroyed Property for 2010 performed by strpmw 04/22/2011 04/22/2011 14:52 Tax Bill Recalculation Destroyed Property for 2011 performed by strpmw 04/22/2011 04/22/2011 11:10 Value Modification Type: Destroyed Property, Status: Approved, Tax Year: 2011 by saslct 04/22/2011 04/22/2011 11:09 Value Modification Type: Destroyed Property, Status: Approved, Tax Year: 2010 by saslct Printable Version Developed by Manatron, Inc. @2005-2010 All rights reserved. Version 1.0.4043.25450 https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(3kewibugeecfry55rpwl5z45)/result.aspx 11/22/2011 • 0 October 28, 2011 Planning Department, City of Edmonds 121 5 h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: A. Request for the elimination of dual address for: legally description: ADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 1 001 D00 - LOT 9 Situs/physical address described on Deed of Trust: 18314 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026 Dual / Mailing address: 7704 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98020-2347 ECIve NO ✓ -12011 PLANNING DEPT B. Request to receive a formal letter for verification of site location for parcel ADMIRALTY ACREES BLK 001 D-00-LOT10 Situs/street Address; 18408 79 h Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Sir: We were instructed/referred by Snohomish County Assessor's Office to contact your office, and file a request to eliminate this unnecessary second/dual address, Your office being an incorporated city in Snohomish County WA, issuing /changing of site address is under your authority. To begin with, this second address was issued when there was only one mail zip code 98020 in city of Edmonds: your office had issued to avoid conflict with similar street numbers for new development on the other side of Olympic View Drive. Our site address had been pre-existing for several decades before this new development. Since then new zip code 98026 was assigned to our property. We strongly believe it is no longer necessary to have dual address. This dual/two address has been creating confusion / havocs among low level characters handling documents. and creating irreparable damages. Although it is abundantly clear from the county record 7704 OVD is a merely a mailing address (Enclosure 1), Some mistakenly regarded as legal property description, situs/street address, or another entity of property. In order\ to avoid any further complication and clear up any confusion/mix up, we had requested this elimination to county Assessor's office. However, we were informed that the authority of such activity is under your authority, the property site being located in Incorporated city of Edmonds, Snohomish County, WA. Second request " There is a question on the site address as it is located in mal zip code 98020 Which should be updated as 98026. County official referred me to write you and correct/updated verification of the site address for the property locate at 18408 79th Ave. W. Edmonds (Enclosure 2 ). The reason for this verification is not the jurisdiction of county but it is the incorporated City of Edmonds, where the property is located. It will be very much appreciated if we could receive your prompt response to this request. Sincerely, H" na ark 18314 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026 CC: Office of Assessor, Snohomish County. To whom it may concern. Enclosure 1, &2 ( 3 PA464 SNOHASH COUNTY Property Account Summary Account No.: 00370800101000 Account Type: Real Property TCA: 00217 Situs Address: 18408 79TH AVE W EDMONDS WA 98020 Legal: `ADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 001 D-00 - LOT 10 Parties: Role Name & Address Owner PARK HAN & REGINA 7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR 'EDMONDS WA 98026 Taxpayer PARK HAN & REGINA r7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR EDMONDS WA 98026 Property Values: Alternate Property Number: 37080010100005 Value Name 2011 2010 2009 Taxable Value Regular $223,300 $346.500 $444,700 Market Total $223,300 $346.500 $444,700 Assessed Value $223,300 $346,500 $444,700 Market Land $223,300 $313,500 $386,000 Market Improvement $0 $33,000 $58,700 Property Characteristics: Tax Year Characteristic Value 2011 Use Code 111 Single Family Residence - Detached Size (gross) 0.64 Exemptions: (End of Report) Run: 10/27/2011 10:05:33 AM ASCO037 (Ascend30_Prodj Page 1 3uvnvmibn t-ounty, WA Assessor Parcel Data Page 1 of SnohomishONiso GowrnoNnt Intormstlon a Sorvleos County4* Mrashmeton x R E A L* Property Information County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us. Date/Time: 11/11/2006 3:51:19 PM Answers to FrequentivAsked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window) Return to Property Information_ERyy page Parcel Number 00370800100900 Prev Parcel Reference 37080010090008 View Map of this parcel (opens as new window) General Information Taxpayer Name 11 Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions) PARK HAN Z & REGINA K 117704 OLYMPIC VIEW DR - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026 If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and Address Changes owner Name Il Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) PARK HAN Z & REGINA K 1119314 OLYMPIC VIEW DR - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the information on Name and Address Changes After a Sale Street (Sites) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 18314-OLYMPIC VIEW DR - - - EDMONDS, WA 98020-2347 Parcel Legal Description ADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 001 D-00 - LOT 9 Go to top of page Treasurer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurers office (opens as new window) 2006 Taxes for this parcel $4,946.02 (Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not included.) To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-388-3366 to request it by phone. Go to top of page Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2006 tax year. Please contact the Treasurers office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window) For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessors Office (opens as new window) Property Values do n9t reflect adjustments made due to an.exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons Values exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. httn•!Ilt]fl 7ZS2 IU7 lfl'2!r�rnncvc!Acr_Tr_prnnlnn/ArnTnnll7 por.•alrint� .�...,�ran!- nnz�nQnn t l Il l i'1nnr. paKr l of 2 + Snohomish County, .� '� sscssor 0e1 Data "Oh 54H homom dow�....� t.+�.�.tl a s..�►�.. comp-ty4o, * 11 E A L * Property Information County Home :lssossar [!�►riu Crcasurt:r [lame Information on which Dermilnient to contact Please view If you have questions, cotnfnents or sunestions, please Contact US. Disclaimer Date/Time:6/7'2007 10:26:50 AM -answers to Frequently Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new win w Return to property Information Entry page Parcel Number 00370800101000 Prev Parcel Reference 37080010100005 f View Mlap of this Parcel (opens as new window) General Information Taxpayer Name p Address (oor►tsd the Treasurer it ynu have qugs"Or's) PARK HAN 117704 al.YMPIC VW DR - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026 If the above :nailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and Address Changes Owner Name II Address (contact u* Assessor it you have questions) PAR{ HAN +17704 OLYMPIC VW DR - - - EDINIONDS, WA 98026 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a rezent sale, please see the information on Name and Address Changes After a Sale street (Slfis, Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 18408 79TH AVE W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98020 Parcel Legal Description ADMIRALTY ACRES SIX (M D-00 - LOT 10 Go to top.of page GAG Z Treasurer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes. please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as new window) 2007 Taxes for this parcel $3,438.20 ("faxes may include Surface Water Management and'or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any. arc nut included.) To obtain a duplicate tax 5tt►*ement. either download our Tax Statzment Request form or call 425-388-3-6t to request it by phone. Go to tcp of page Assessor's Property Data C aractert-oks and VJ!UC Data bctuu are `or .'.G,r % tax year. Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to gnestions shout Taxes (.ipcns as new windo, ; For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessor's Office Property Values do rie: rr11ccl adjustroc.its orra de d:►•s to .m c%emption. �urh as a sevior or disabled per..ons N. allies exemption. I%educt:or,, for exempriun; .,re made cn C:•c prop%:.r. tax h:ll. htto:%/webs.co.Snohomish.wa.u=.%>1n-)r)sys..'asr-tr-hrovinq%[Grping02-ParceiDat.a.asp'?PN=(;O') I... 67• 01'17 G E T `L CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering April 22, 1993 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Mr. Han Park 7704 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Park: I'have reviewed your account and will allow a credit to your account according to our City policy: the average consumption for the same period during the.previous year charged at normal customer rates, plus the excess usage charged at the City's cost, plus a surcharge of 15% applied to the excess only. Only one leak credit will be granted in any three year period. Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new billing, please contact Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk. Sincerely, ,nr Ron Holland Water/Sewer Supervisor RH/lk cc: Ilene Larson Utility Billing Clerk #322350/TXTWATER • Incorporated August 11, 1890 R Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan MEMO FOR RECORD ADDITION INFORMATION AT 7704 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE April 6, 1993 March 26, 1993 - I called Mr. Park and left a message to call by 4:00 PM and had no response. I stated that water would be shut off by 8:00 AM if no progress had been made on the water service line by this time. March 28, 1993 - I called Mr. Park and asked if any work had been done. He stated no. I asked why and he said he was not going to pay for the repairs. The contractor stated he was not responsible after meeting with Mr. Park on Wednesday and seeing what.had been dug up and was repaired, but still leaking beyond 30' from the meter on private property. This I stated was 10 days after we had hooked up a temporary hose. I also told him that this was ample time to have the service line replaced because of concerns with liability we needed to terminate service via our fire hydrant. Ron Holland Date 7704OVD/TXTWATER �`' •�—�i �.� � �C� _ _.___Ci�t �•� �L �A✓.._� �0�"'J i1 �V-�D �.� i�w.�:t_c,�.�f� •I�r:�:� OSTOEL RIVES 60LEY 0 Bradley G. Taylor Attorney at Law 400 - 1.12th: Ave.; -NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 JONES & GREY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36TH FLOOR ONE UNION SQUARE. 600 UNIVERSITY STREET SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101.3197 Telephone (206) 624.0900 Telecopi (106)386.7500 MCI Mal No. 4955830 Eat+!Lmk No. 62413580 TDD (206) 628-6208 April 3, 1993 Suite 300-_ Re: Dr. and Mrs. Park: Karnak Construction Inc. Dear Mr. Taylor: We are in receipt of your letter of April 1, 1993. We believe that several responses that are.set forth in your letter are incorrect. In the second paragraph, you state that Karnak did not damage the Park's water line. For your information, there was at least one break.caused by activity of Karnak. That break occurred about two feet west of the meter (i.e., on the Park side of the meter). this break and its repair were discovered recently by the contractor that Dr. Park had hired to check out and fix breaks in the line. In the course of. inspection that contractor saw a new connection had been made on the Park side of the meter. On March 24, Karnak's foreman acknowledged that a break of the Park water line had occurred in the activities of Karnak, and had been repaired by Karnak. This break may have occurred prior to January 7, 1993-.(refer to letter of Davis'to Boyle dated February 25, 1993, paragraph 1, 4, and your April 1, 1993 letter, paragraph 4). The third paragraph of your letter concerns the shut off notice. Dr. and Mrs. Park did not obtain from either the City or Karnak any early shut off notice or notices about what was happening with regard to the Park water supply. Mr. Park has checked with the water department and engineering department as to shut off notices. A representative of the City departments stated that the City had has no record of any such notice being given, and the City could not provide a copy of such notice. Given this situation had such notice.been provided, the Parks could have and would have taken steps to minimize the adverse effects of a surge of air or water pressure on their water system when the water supply.to the Park household was turned back on. SEATTLE. PO RTLAND, BELLEVUE, VANCOUVER- BOISE. SALTLAKECITY, WASHINGTON. WASHINGTON OREGON WASHINGTON WASIUNGTON IDAHO LMAH DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STOEL RIVES QOLEY )ONES & CREY Bradley G. Taylor April 3, 1993 Page 2 Your fourth paragraph states that Karnak found no evidence of leakage in the area in which it performed its work. We are not sure what this investigation consisted of. There is a reference in your letter to the effect that Karnak exposed the water service line in the property and found no disconnected or broken line nor any physical evidence that there was water leakage. We request information from Karnak as to the extent of such exposure, how much of the line was exposed and how exposed was the pipe. What observations were actually made concerning the condition of the pipe? Since the soil in the area is porous, there may not be physical evidence of leakage of the water on the surface of the ground, but the readings were showing there was a break(s) in the line somewhere. The first paragraph on the second page refers to the "other contractor" which matter was covered.in our letter of March 31. That "other contractor" was the contractor hired by Park to locate where the break(s) in the water line may have occurred. That other contractor located a break about 10 feet away from the break caused by Karnak. The other contractor did not and had not "broke the line during its excavation." The other contractor exposed the pipeline approximately another 10 feet and cut out that portion to make certain that any breaks or cracks in the line did not reoccur. The other contractor was in the process of repairing that break with a new 10 ft. piece of pipe when Scott of the Edmonds water system arrived. The new pipe was properly inserted and joined by the other contractor to the open ends of the pipe line. Upon testing, it was ascertained that the prior 15 to 20 gallons of water per minute was reduced to approximately 5 gallons per minute. In short, the other cortractor.did not break the line -- he fixed a broken part of the line. Scott of the Edmonds water system had witnessed the reduction of leak on the water meter along with Dr. Park, Mrs. Park and the "other contractor." Your letter fails to address the subject of taking down the fence and the mailbox (and replacing the blacktopping that has been removed), all by Karnak. Why was the fence on the west side of the meter removed? Apparently Karnak had to work on that side of the meter. We believe that Karnak did work on that side of the meter. As noted above, there was a break 2 ft. to the west side of the meter which occurred and was acknowledged by a representative of Karnak's and repaired by Karnak. SEA)-18828.1 13834 0001 s 5 TOt`L RIVES QOLEY )ONES &&KEY Bradley G. Taylor April 3, 1993 !" Page 3 Your letter als/ine. to an affirmative obligation to mitigate damages. Theotice of excess of water usage was in September. The Cixpressed a view to Mr. Park that this was a situationd occurred in the overall development of the waterr. Park was told he probably would have an outstanding water bill until the January 1, 1993 when an adjusted and credit would be given to Dr. Park._ However, when the January bill came in, it appeared that problems were still in existence and getting worse. Dr. Park increased further .efforts to obtain the naives of involved parties and become otherwise involved in solving the problem. During the last three months, Dr. Park tried to work with Karnak on this problem, but Gary Davis of Karnak refused to meet with Dr. Park. Dr. Park then hired the "other. contractor" above referred to (that matter is covered above and in.our prior letter). The other contractor remedied at least one of the breaks that occurred in the general vicinity of where we believe Karnak was operating. Again, that "other contractor" rather than being the cause of the break(s) was repairing one of the breaks resulting from what we believe was the earlier work performed by Karnak. -Further, there was no authorization from Dr. Park to Karnak for modifying the framework of the water meter from three separate services to one service only. Dr. Park had paid for the earlier three service frame works and outlets from the main line. He understood the three service outlets were to be reinstalled in the new meter box, but this did not occur. What is Karnak's response to this issue? Returning again to the subject of the fence, mailbox and the blacktop, we ask for your client's response as to what action will be taken to restore these facilities once a water line to the Park home is put back in working order. We again ask for cooperation of Karnak in resolving this matter. We think it is to the best interest of all parties that there be an early meeting to determine if the differences can be resolved, so the parties can take appropriate steps to remedy the existing situation. SEAL-18828.1 13834 0001 ` STOOL KI V ES QOLEY • JON ES & GREY Bradley G. Taylor April 3, 1993 Page 4 If that cooperation is not promptly forthcoming, Dr. Park will take such steps as appropriate to this matter. Sincerely, /, Zibt6�it� C-� � Richard A. Clark RAC/bc cc: City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Ron Holland Cree Construction Co. 5529 - 186th Place SW Lynnwood, WA Attn: Michael Boyle SEA1-18828.1 13834 0001 From : KARNAK—CONSTRUCT Imo'- INC. KARNAK CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 1729 2081 h STREET S.E. , BOTH E LL, WA. 98012 VAX COVER PACI's 01.1993 11:47 AM P01 Office: (206) 483-2904 DATE: TO: CA 1 ri ` Y o F C22 L n9P-J ATTENTION: FROM; RE: ram -P -► NUMHH,R OF PAGRIS INCLUDING COVER: it THERE ARE AND PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION PLEASE CONTACT AT 483-2904. OUR VAX n A. TS 486-67fl3 NOTES: QUALYIY PR017UCTNTI'Y SAFETY galKARNAK + CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED "'From : KARNAK-CONSTRUCT I .NC. Y rn1vv. �J0�1t'. 01993 1—US THU IUql�UIBRA KEY G. I AYLOR A,TT0II n 1:Y AT LAW April 1., 1993 Richard A. Clark, Esq. STOEL RIVES I3OLEY JONES & GREY One Union Square, 3611) Floor 600 University Street Seattle, Washington. 981.01-3197 Re: Dr. and Mrs, Park/Karnak Construction, Inc. Dear Mr. Clark: 11:47 AM P02 r o vc My client, Karnak Construction, Inc,, forwarded your March 31,1993 letter to me last night and requested that I respond. In discussing this situation. with Karnak, it became apparent that your clients do not know what .work Karnak performed and that your clients have a problem with their water supply line between the (meter and the house which they are attempting to have Karnak repair or replace the lina. Karnak did not dan-mSe the Parks' waterline and it willnot repair or replace the waterline. Yotyr letter fiv%irtuates that lbe Parks did not receivea shut of notice wtleit the new cight inch line was installed and connected in front of their home and that some how this lack of notice has something to do with their problem.. I have been informed that the City of.Edmonds did in fact provide the Parks with notice and it was the City of. Edmonds who first informed the Parks they had an unusually high water usage. Whether the Parks received a notice seems of little significance. Karnak acknowledges that the Parks have complained about their high water usage and have alleged that Karnak caused the problem.. Karnak, as a responsible contractor, investigated the Parks' complaint o>a several occasions. Each time itwent to the site, Karnak found no evidence of leakage in the area where it performed work. Tine last tune it went to the site, Karnak exposed the water scMce Iine. to lice property and found no disconnected or broken line, nor did it find any physical evidence that there was a leak in line. Contrary to your letter., Karnak has thoroughly investigated the situation and has determined that it caused no damage to the Parks' water. service, 400-112111 ;111'INI.I'. N.V.. st:1'Ir.:3E1f1. 11I.-I:I,I:I l'I:, 1C'A�;III\1;'I't)� �1'ra111.1 - ,:'.E)hi�all-1),il'11',\\: i'!.�11,j }:�:%-l'-"2l� • -AFrom : KARNAK-CONSTRUCT I INC. Pam. 01.1993 11: 47 AM . P03 April 1, 1993 Page -2 inspector with the Edmonds Public Works Department, According to Mx. Highlwtd, a break in the line was "discovered" some ten to twenty feet inside the Parks' property line and is a area populate by blackberry vines. Mr. Highland has indicated that the break appeared to be fresh indicating that this other contractor broke the line during its excavation.. You should note that Karnak did not perform work on the Parks' property and, in fact, its work related to the Parks' property extended only as far as exposing the meter and connecting the new eight inch line to th4 meter. This "significant break" was not caused by Karnak..' Without belaboring the point, K,amak will not accept responsibility for the Parks' problem. Karnak performed its work in accordance with the project documents without, damaging the Parks' waterline. Your letter state that "if Karnak/Cxee and/or the City are not prepared to take steps at their cost to correct the dam ,ge to the Park water lino, a third -party contractor will be put into the picture to undertake these steps." I would suggest, and Karnak welcomes, that the Parks bring in a contractor to fiat their waterline. First, the Parks will find that their problem is wholly unrelated to the work performed by Karnak.. Second, the Parks' have an affirmative obligation to nutigate whatever damage they may incur if there is fault allocated to Karnak. Thus fu, the Parka have completely failed to mitigate their damages when they move from the home and wait some eight months after the work was performed to hire a. contractor. to locate their problem. . Reasonable mitigation of damages would certainly include performing an investigation to determine that actual, not alleged, cause of the problem, notifying Karnak/Gina/the City of Edmonds of the problem, and then fixing the problem if liability is denied. . . By this letter, Karnak Construction, Inc. formally notifies the Parks that they deny liability for their waterline problem and it will take no Nrther steps toward determining the stature of the Parks' problem. Very truly, Bradley G. Taylor cc; Karnak Construction, Inc. STOEL RIVES BOLEY 10 JONES & GREY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36TH FLOOR ONE UNION SQUARE 600 UNIVERSITY STREET SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3197 Telephone (206) 624-0900 Telecopier (206) 386-7500 Telex RCA 292986 March 31, 1993 Karnak Construction Incorporated 1729 — 208th Street Southeast Bothell, Washington 98012 Attention: Gary Davis Gentlemen: RECEIVED APR a 1 1993 PUSLIC WORKS DEPT Re: Dr. and Mrs. Han Z. Park and Property Owned by Them At 7704 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Washington We wish to advise you that we have been asked to represent Dr. and Mrs. Han Z. Park in matters pertaining to problems and damages that have occurred to the Park water supply line ("Park, water line") that goes to their home from the new pipeline installed along the street in front of their property ("new Supply Line"). We understand that the new Supply Line Karnak Construction, Incorporated ("Karnak") as Cree Construction Co. ("Creel'), to service a office building in the vicinity. As a result of of the new Supply Line, the Park water line frc Line to the Park home has been damaged. was installed by subcontractor to iew federal post the construction :n the new Supply The Park family has lived in their home for many years. No water problems were experienced until the new Supply Line was extended to the federal post office building in mid -summer of 1992. As we understand it, the Park home was to be hooked into the new Supply Line. However, no specific time was given as to when that step would occur, nor was any advance shutoff notice provided to the Parks. Such shutoff notice steps had been customary in past shutoff situations. This type of notification had enabled the Parks to accommodate to the situation and no problems resulted to their water line system from prior shutoffs. As you are aware, the billings for water to users are provided after the reading(s) of the meter. There is a lapse in time from the usage of water to the reading of the meter and then to the billing itself. It was not until September 1992, we believe, that the first billings for the period following the shutoff were received by the Parks. It was then that excessive SEATTLE. WASHINGTON PORTLAND. BELLEVUE. VANCOUVER. BOISE. ST.. LOUIS. WASHINGTON. OREGON WASHINGTON WASHINGTON IDAHO MISSOURI DISTRIC r OF COLUMBIA r STOEL RIVES QOLEY )ONES & GREY Karnak Construction Incorporated March 31, 1993 Page 2 amount of water use (far beyond normal or prior use) showed up on the billings to the Parks. Concerns and complaints were promptly expressed by Dr. Park to both the City of Edmonds ("City") and Karnak, as well as to Cree. However, very little was done by these three mentioned parties to check out the problem. Dr. Park retained the services of another contractor party to check out the Park water line to the Park home. A significant break in the Park water line to the Park home was discovered by the other contractor, and that part of the line was repaired by the other contractor. That action greatly reduced, but did not eliminate, the substantial leakage that had been occurring in the Park water line to the Park home. It appears clear the break that was fixed by the Park contractor was caused by Karnak's work in the area. Because of other work commitments, the contractor party that found one of the breaks in the Park water line was unable to continue its search for additional breaks in the line. The Park water line has been completely shut off by the City at this point in time. The Parks were forced to move from their home. The Parks will require reimbursement for the costs and damages sustained and to be sustained until the damage to the Park water line is repaired and the Park family is able to return to the family home. We believe it to the best interest of Karnak in cooperation with the City to make the repair of the Park water line to the Park home since it appears the damage to the Park water line has been the result of the actions of Karnak. Moreover, there are still a fence and a mail box to be properly reinstalled and black top to be replaced at the expense of Karnak. These items were all to be restored in good order when the new Supply Line was put in place. (We understand that water is currently being supplied through the new Supply Line to the new post office). Dr. Park wishes to receive your written assurance that the above steps will be promptly performed once the water line to the home is put in working order. -We are, of course, aware of the fact that the City has imposed additional charges for the water that has leaked out of the Park water line to the home until the recent shut off the water pipe to the Park home. If Karnak/free and/or the City are SFAI-18537.1 13834 STOEL RIVES BOLEY )ONES & GREY Karnak Construction ,Incorporated March 31, 1993 Page 3 not prepared to take steps at their cost to correct the damage to the Park water line, a third -party contractor will be put into the picture to undertake these steps. If this happens, the Parks will look for reimbursement of this expense, in addition to the expenses that the Parks are now being put to including moving from their home and finding a new location in which to reside. We would ask for cooperation of all parties in this matter so that litigation can be avoided, and for your early response to this letter. Very truly yours, -0 a*'t4 Richard A. Clark CC: `City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, WA 9.8020 Attn: Ron Holland Cree 'Construction Co. 5529 -186th Place SW Lynnwood, Washington Attn: Michael Boyle PS: We ask for a prompt response by telephone (624-0900) or fax (386-7500) from Karnak as .to whether'it will undertake the steps requested of it in this matter. SFAI-18537.1 13934 BUILDING DI V ION TELEPHONE/VISIT RECORD ti � vow DATE 221�,'L3 �� TIME STREET FILE PERSON CALLED -COMPANY hNsZ: TELEPHONE # PROJECT 'F, v WihL L�.� RE:� 2�-r�c.�A� 11azF evyo w),im � Z11tcG� l�tN `%' FI��C WN : bs �p►.,.Ici��+.�t .?c.� -lam- �--�T A �1 �=c.� �vra s-1- , � .. CALL TAKEN BY: VISIT DATE TIME LOCATION PROJECT WHOM/COMPANY SUBJECT FILE COMMENTS: CITY REPRESENTATIVE: • MEMO FOR RECORD March 17, 1993 7704 Olympic View Drive On June 15, 1992; the new water main on Olympic View Drive was installed by Karnac Construction for the post office project in Perrinville. In July•the consumption was a little higher than normal. When we read the meter on August 31, 1992, the meter.indicated a higher than normal consumption and a door hanger was left on the front gate to notify customer of problem. On September 1, 1992, a letter was sent to this address to back up the door hanger so we would.be sure the owner would be notified of the problem. No response was made -by the homeowner in regard to fixing the line. On October of 1992, our Utility Billing Department granted a 66 unit credit that should not have been issued as the meter had spun over and consequently had a lower reading than the previous two months earlier. This could not be proven that the meter had actually spun over so we naturally assumed it was a misread. On January 6, 1993, we had a second incident where it looks like there had been another•misread. I had Scott Highland check the reading to verify and it was found to have been misread and the correct reading was entered (we feel that the reading was incorrect that Scott had reported and should have been left at 200 as the original read was entered). At this time Scott indicated that the meter had a large amount of water being consumed and he left a door hanger and contacted.me and I in turn contacted the owner and left a message on his answering machine. - When Mr. Park called me, I informed him that he had a large leak and that he should correct this problem as soon as possible to avoid a large water bill. He asked if the city could assist in locating the leak and I agreed to do this and set a time to meet with him to check the area out: On January 12, 1993, Scott met with Mr. Park to look for a leak.on his property. The only thing that was found was some dampness around the water meter. Scott then.had Unit #22 dig up at the meter to verify that there was no. leak on the 'city side the same date. I.then contacted Mr. Park and explained the situation to him that the leak was in fact located some where on his property and i.t would be his responsibility to repair. He than stated that this must have been caused by the contractor when they installed .the new service to his meter. I stated thatI would contact Gary from Karnac Construction and let him investigate the problem. On February 3, 1993, Karnac Construction had a crew on site that exposed the service.line one (1) foot to the west of the cyclone fence and found a small pinhole in the galvanized pipe. They repaired this and could not see any water entering the excavation site. This was verified by Scott Highland and also.videoed -by .Gary with Karnac Construction. At this time we considered the problem to be the homeowners. I contacted:Mr. Park and notified him. He insisted that the problem was the.city's I'Ahen recommended Mr. Park contact Lyle,Chrisman who was the engineering inspector on the site during construction and he would have to file a claim with the city if he felt .he had a .valid claim.. .I again stated this was his choice, but also stated he should have.,the I ine repaired and then•include_this in his claim so .at least his;:.bi is would stop increasing at such a rapid rate. 1,. .. Tr.- 110 VI?> f 1� (7r ��iL9P Memo for .Record J��S 7704 O1 m i V'ew D y p c i rive Page 2' During this period, I ve had Scott Highland take readings since January 7, 1993 until he present to document when the meter would spin over so we may bill M . Park correctly and eliminate any doubt that we may have misread the 'eter. Our readings indicate that from January 7 to March 17, 1992 he s used 1,710 units of water and is still running on the average o 4.79 units per day. (Units = 748 gallons of water) this usage 1,27 gallons since January 7, 1993 has been lost: On February 19, 1993, a delinquent notice for nonpayment of water was sent out by utility Billing with a due date of March 2, 1993. No payment was received, so a door hanger was left on March 8, 1993 with a shut off notice of March 11, 1993. On March 16, 1993, I contacted Mr. Park for the last time, as his name was on -the turn off list for nonpayment. I stated I would have no choice but to turn his meter off if payment was not made by March 17, 1993. He still persisted in stating it was the city's responsibility. I notified my supervisor, Noel Miller, and stated the situation and he confirmed what I had. stated to Mr. Park.. On March 17, 1993, Mr Park's water was terminated. I was contacted by the mayor to turn the water back on until further notice from her. This was done at approximately 5:00 PM.- jSI. 3-4_43 Ron Ho4lafid Date V REPORT OF UNIT HUFilIER; WATER/SEWER DEPARTICIT •- DAILY YEIIICLE WORK'REPORT. DINE: - -%-92 HEATHER: .Job Address _ In Oul Employee Job Description Materials ` 'T -,o 46P ('36 11:4 b 2'00 2,,3p (NVC-NTOR - NCW ^RCSTp�,K T UGK GMIEU�C-OVT�RETSI�N 3'30 W.O. fi Equipment. In O'Tr T ALC• i G l_E► �EZ'E 2 E QU t P. 2'.30 3:30 3R�©2- W.O. Equipment R C_NT r wb air C, ../-y O + j a 1 T �V' �� .V • \1nA� •a 11©-vIV.__ In Out - - -- - '6 TQ I WE N61 Z-, H OTT: K1 of •T CASfL SCR ..4 �" i 1�1 K -- a w � f2 -o l_L_ P Fo r To 1 LE rr � 4 In out i =F I I WATER/SEWER DEPARTHEUT -- DAI-LY YEIIICLE NORY'•REPORT REPORT OF UNIT HUM ER; l DATE: WEATHER: I a S�e r.. .Job Address Timp M In Out Employee Job Description - Materials. o� W.O. Equipment. ----- ------.- NS - ` FevN� -- Q gU E _ --.- RE.�1.j In �,c an -gk -- CRoUNO W-6— . -- ca LOG t _ . m ' ui ent 107 _EiTN PI- 2-o 7-r-1-: . r,Ac K May BE W7,Mp 1 C4 LrQ FOR LOGAT�S At m4cm StFcr� �ow►,j T So. SStS-r t_ Ets v< In Out N C- - CC1LLf�-D FQQ LOCA14(- HCZ K VA t_V E #' S-VAT-Jfl P 1 P E .. , G. FOR -vJ fzvl SiQCZL-,jE C T-c- v►.:� 2 e N E. t E WER/sEIIER DEPARTICIT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORK''REPORT REPQRT Of UNIT HU1iDER;P�po ,.. DATE ;—r---- �---- WEATHER; • Job Address Timp- In Oul Employee Job Description - Materials i W.O. uipment. Tn Outf '� ep A. W . 0 . # ui enttiv� tom- ,. r- ell - -� �� --r In Out - --- - -- .•�10 OF ninmpnt 1 ' out�• • 4 •-,JATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT - WORF•: REPORT REPORT T OF UNIT #----- JOB ADDRESS -----------------1 ---» ------ AC)P AJ.O. TIME IN 1 OUT EMPLOYEE 1 EOU I PMENT 1 1---- -- - ---- - ; '--------------'-- --- --- - -_ , DATE: -- - J ---- _ WEATHER: ------- - -- ----__ ---- ------ ' ; JOB DISCRIPTION 11 MATERIALS -------------------------------- =--- 1: ------------------------ 5.�%r''_R_v_=---�---'------------------- --- ' iNvLNZa2y S�PP�y 2M- MT�.SI{��!s------ , , ' -- ' -- - - - -----------------------------' ' ----------------------- "------------------------' 1------------------------- ' „-----------------------' „-------=---------------' „ -------' 11-----------------------' ---------------- ----------------- --•------------'---------- —^ D SC. vj.T(2. - - - -, �N�,'�fi7V. t c'�✓ j CN U O T w�� -_-..' NC�-L-�- ---------------•-------- �`-? O-N-T E° Q.�©U_�--7 x�\N;' ---�- 2-EW-P-�A-%�-Q- -1 ,, ,_$_�t1S`i� -1 -. _I _'_M�E-• -. --#, ,i, ,, �-�---_-_------ ----- --•--- -- ._- .-_A2 _Mr-A_�r�_1 __t..�_Y�j•T t SFr _M�1ll� - 1 RG�O , , [�E/Zv_rC LCCATC0------------------------- ; ,------- , , 7 - - -VP iC 7 bPJMIS TC= C;Ui- Gf= i__________________--_.____.-- ; ----------------------- -----._._-.----------------- 11 IN 1 OUT 1 ----------------;;-----1-----; -----------------------=-; „ ----'- --'- ----- 1 1--•--------------•--------------•-------' ' ------------------------ „ , 11 1; ' 1.0. #; ;1 EQUIPMENT , -------------------------------------- ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---- ; m ' -----•--------------•---- '------------------------- ' , '---------=-------------- 1 , 1------------------------ , 1--------------------- '-------------------- --------------------T-- ------------------------ . ----------------------- 1---------------------- W11 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering September 1, 1992 Han Z Park 7704 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Resident: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR On August 31, 1992 a door hanger was put on your door regarding a possible water leak in the water system. Our most recent reading of your water meter indicates unusually high consumption and/or a current water leak in the system. Please check for leaking faucets, toilets, pipes etc., as no billing credit is allowed on these items. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Utility Billing after you receive your billing statement at 771-0241 or Water Maintenance, 771-0235, extension 349 or 347. Sincerely, z ? '1 Ron Holland Water/Sewer Supervisor RH/lk FOLLOWUP/TXTWATER • Incorporated .August 11, 1890 0 DEBIT/CREDIT"ADJUSTMENTS DEBITW CREDIT(-)' �ACCOUNT NUMBER 3W4.773 -50 WATER 1-1 CURRENT SURCHARGE 1-2 UTILITY 2-1 MISC. — Se Tyi:e Arn0uY,A* -B..al a nc e Elate Sry Date Rr-adiy3 TYP-R�ite GonF� 1 75 # 3B 10/29/92 08/31./92 00,0375 1­2 0001 .66 000 A 4 o 10--- . .. -11 li9,% 'I -.. i n(W) *1 AA--- 000 A•1. * 28- 7:L,, 29- 09/24/92 08/31/92 000441 09/20/92 05/21/92 05/01/92 000290 Due Elate TotaL I. -A 0001. 10*7 000 2­1 000:1. 1.8 000 CUI-T-ent 1. MISC. I .T. .126*04 F:. 95 * 08- 36o2O 2 - DEBITW CREDIT(-) PREPAYMENT AMOUNT TOTAL CONSUMPTION AMOUNT _37,E 1.26.04 61. * 43 3 SIGNED SUPPLIER DATE u I A L.1 I I W A L.L.1 ll%j T 1, @DEBIYCREDIT ADJUSTMENTS ,7 4P — -,I. DEBITW CREDIT(-) ACCOUNT NUMBER.. WATER CURRENT SURCHARGE UTILITY MISC. rl i T)g Type Ra-te C 0 yls r1a A. e 6111*V Date Rea 20 2-- I. 0001. 991 03/24/93 03/00/93 0008 991 01/29/93 01/06/93 00f-%H---e'y •01/21/93 01/06/93 000200 11/24/92 10/28/92 0003'75 T.itle Date To -t a L 0001. 0001 current .2-1 fey I. Type Amount Ba Lance 000 1 3,6020 I t '757.,31 025 000 PREPAYMENT AMOUNT TOTAL CONSUMPTION AMOUNT l0o48 2 /- 6"1- SUPPLIER DATE SIGNED y�qp KA A A K T - ,ppr jye� A' Y L�Ss haw 0 I L E . i CONSTRUCTION Once. (206) 483-2904 INCORPORATED a^txrt+�^��, , -• rr�,'JiSS�::YwS'tn,.,.. .w.rm,'m�i.,mtra 1729 208th-STREET-S.E..., BOTHELL, WA.- .98012,,.1t:.;. February25, .1993 Michael Boyle Cree Construction 5529 186th Place S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98046-9603 Project: Perrinville Carrier Facility MAR U 1 1993 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Subject: Domestic service leak at 7704 Olympic View Drive Dear Michael, On January 12, 1993 we were informed by the City of Edmonds of an apparent water leak of the domestic service at the above referenced address: -The:City of Edmonds.exposed:the meter, meter setter, and the connections and found no leakage.. We inspected the exposed area, then looked on the property and could not -see any visible signs of a leak. In our discussions with the City of Edmonds, they felt that because the meter, setter, and connections did not leak the problem was in our installation or Mr: Park's water line to his house. Over the next several weeks on at least two separate occasions we sent our field supervisor to evaluate the situation and come up with solution to the problem. In all of our visual inspections there was no evidence that our work could have caused the leak that. Dr. Park has in his domestic water line. On February 4, 1993, in order to put this issue to rest we sent a crew to expose the water service line into the property. We dug down to meter setter and exposed the line threefeet into the Dr. Park's property under the chain link fence. We took a video tape showing the work we did this day. If we had caused the leak in Dr. Park's water line we feel that it would have been apparent when we exposed the line. KARAK CONSTRUCTION' Once: (206) 483-2904 INCORPORATED 1729 208th STREET S.E., BOTHELL, WA. 98012 We informed the City of Edmonds our findings. We also notified yourself. We feel we have done all we can in this matter. The threat of Dr. Park talking to an attorney about this matter is Dr. Park's decision to make. The fact that Dr. Park's water line leaks has nothing to do with the work we performed in this area. Sincerely, )J" D-&-,-:, Gary Davis Vice President Karnak Construction, Inc. cc: City of Edmonds - Ron Holland Fruhling, Inc.. - Irvin Vice Dr. Park Bradley G. Taylor - Attorney. �EciceD 6-20-93 • n� s rl ro-4.9� yo GONT. LAOhJCe C'IPE t To MEET co►,11. FOR KAIy FIt.L{tVG O2 TESTIt.SG - COrJi. tVOT s+iEQE , , ,- t5- 9 2• INaA PRESSURE Te -t- o.u. 30o P,$l . ¢ 77 wAT&R SAMPLG- TAKE L{NOA Fait 7 HVTjGES Fort waTER oFF �THURS� (,-23-9.2 �o 6D -2s- 92. scow T�FF MA►�1 t METERS FU2 Math T{E-1/J 6- 25-92 4U AssisT&b wlTr+ sNUT=oFF ^_� %1LL rJ:OO &k91 13.J ASSIST WI -CIA -FLUSHIN 6 AFMk TTIoN �--- - G-267 92 S'c.o7 ✓GO►J=• coleRE.GilONS •ro 2 �! SE•TCEiZ METER G-30-92- JNSZ". 2„ MCTEa A.-r, Wsr �FG(CC� R 1 C,K APPLICATION CENTER' FOR., TECHNOLOGY T?`►.i,.. ,. -+ce y gRiva �T14 C0tTt0tQ �CLWW hANUAL- KIEw 1Auis14r- 5 I i i I i i I I .. i I oaoaooa , . Digital Equipment Corporation • WATER/SEIIER OEPARTIVIT . -- DAILY VEHICLE NORM''REP,ORT REPORT Of UNIT HOMER: DATE: l-4 WEATHER: • Job Address Ti,. Fnployee Job Description Materials In Oul C .r� Ll U, �I J :iCJ 16;ov I1� W.O. EquiMent. _r ` ', 7\4 A Ni = W.O. Equipment v'' �0 1 'tT rl Q • RUa® MTR . ` wt t - �.15 2�0 80-[►� MT2. vir - FouND ON -- 'I o f F j Lor-KCC) ... In Out XCIN .04C ._.. a A�'� �OCA't E -�--- 215 2 V N la LG( -rN � OFFIc.G PRCJ, - 6 i L rVG A,1jk.:9' M^Ih:J F Tn out WATER/SERER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORK"REP,ORT REPORT OF UNIT HUHIIER: / A c .Job Address In Oul Employee Job Description (WV tff-cp E�c� er?� W•0• # -Equipment. DATE: WEATHER: ------------ Materials Sco`T k-r4 L oTs oF" 'i C-17 S 30 %LOCATE: A K FaR WNL_vC 2Ct�nt - u sc >' 4? t a R. to O , l^I ST. W.O. #Equipment c� ✓ NEw 44y�• a t,)Gc• .v "W 99 R4� w lT�+ /i TQ ? -- In Out 1011 4'L A l KEt9 •r Ca �f.F`T fl042. �•�.At.1{L' e_: t i L.©c 'i men tG►�QL~i� l r., rt DAr-AAo rz- R T i t i I NA A, a C WATER/SEIIER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORK,'REPORT REPORT OF UNIT NUWIER: A41. V v >. ,,,gyp A, MC- M.o. Yj Job Address MA '! In Oul Employee Job Description I /J : Q P R-/ . '4 F-r C O R p S LCTTF W.O. # EquiTxnent . DATE: WEATHER: Materials in =30 -Out '•3t� 'P w!5 �S KD QE FLu eft �tf� ',00 30 �:unw ui ent 17 107 In Out �- E '� -G %j1'� s FQ 226't�t �y►� 21 S©S 6-7 y.�L. � _yJ 1�' 1 t �1 ¢.zµ� 1 1 r' rll I IT OF UNIT HUMMER;pp_�P . Job Address Timp • 0 VLIIltLL WUhf, ht;rUi(l In Out Employee Job Description Tz- W.O. -Equipment. 7 -7 In qf0c) 17:2d> OAJ, D_ c. W. 0. Equipment 1) -7�,AT In Out e5 mpn t 7 /Z L IC-4 c7 PT n lc>39'- E? 26 - ;Z a/Dz. S,w— DLO DATE: WEATHER: Materials WATER/SEIIER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORY''REPORT REPORT Of UNIT NUMDER: 77 ' 4�'r V A - = s c-o . i4 'Job Address Timp In Oult Fmployee Job Description / 1 �►ou s /d ca *�; e t OeLe, wa W.O. # ui ment . • 2e.p4N W.O. # ? -2 4 quipment ®mm mm DATE: WEATHER: Materials i � �._equiFmeoL_I -I WATER/SERER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORM,"REPORT —DEPART OF UNIT NUMDER: "7 ,.N tA1/ c IL-c DATE: WEATHER: • Job Address Ti,. Fmployee Job Description Materials In Ou' C T00 r , �r v. C-.c-OR S oo Ln: 3() EN i csR W.O. # Equipment. I'c lf) ?' °YQ o:oo FLuS�-IEJ 14- 0 LOCJve:0 o a C 6 0 l 2 ? Q.D GTE 0L v1Ew MTP , 12Ca29 rl. — CF �20 W.O. # Equipment <�'? EL�-wo SCE uwt r APT , 12 1 U- VAL-L-Gtj p L OC,A � �^ �ST C L 2-. U E i• J REE / O In Out 2 DMToQ 'Y`R 1 C- ' TfAj u rbeC W I-rµ- IJ WiN -- TUL0 Gc #-1T: Wt+,IF-i2E To DIG ButeIW c. - Aecck _ -CL1 GVC--2 WA-reK--t5kF-- NOTI CCS FA-Twuvs. 1 ALD,mi-g STA • wor mq*vI T--'.t 19341 c�� nR --- •t'T "#A2 . .FoR S. cNAN WATER/SEIIER DEPARTHEHT -- DAILY YEIIICLE WORKREPORT REPORT Of UNIT Hum ER: W W : fw Tvc A C_ tw�,/S W. s • Job Address Tima In Oul Employee Job Description ' C) PREP. W.O. # ui _pment . DATE: WEATHER: Materials LC CT . � "— o f "3 Z' 1ti1 _ AOJ - , PIS, N A%K_ ui ent �c,7 2t�lruR M cwSc $ y v _ c-ti,E ar 0.\S 12 T LOS F b �-E A -PL N Fi 2 — In out C v C - ( r „ t✓tE tTL S IMCI HOC. ELANpimG 90 9 Tr o . MARv< RnrL Q tic s Por_� P ninmpnt�tr{�S 0OL_. -- 1 g Te watLc< w,T-tf fCiH. Q4 v C ✓ ANC OP NT v►E�r ES . AN.. ka0 l ToaKs UAW E COOS C . • u � vN rT OF UNIT NUM ER: ( � LA 0 WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WO.RY''REPORT DATE: 4-' WEATHER: • Job Address Ti mp Employee Job Description - Materials In Ou`t ��► `= 7io 10 nn �r� P, 3 �2:� .^.T�n rrc� �. cA �- :�� cr- -Z3�0 :y�`3 (= �I� `..sir'+•.:/ -�C-4�- �--�/(r---" (_ "��� - �[ 1 `7 W . 0. Equipment. 7-1 46 In u 771K72-3gPj_ t-( o 7 Z5 -23� Sifi2c/8 3 --7� e/ W.O. # Equipment 717 -31 j_-7 e7 In Out � >. v a.i L T * T' U P 1101 "7-n In out :300lJ-3 EQiiJ- _ ..WATER/SEIIER DEPARTMENT -- DAILY VEHICLE WORY, ­REP.ORT 1• REPORT Of UNIT NUM ER: DATE: a WEATHER; S • Job Address Employee Job Description Materials In Wt r1 � ill Gam, r i. C Gl a-lt i n IAIArM W.O. Equipment. UL- ry v r 1 In u� ao W.O. # uipment :. In Out .• ._ .. Inr' Y 8 9 0 199- STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 7 71-3 202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering March 30, 1989 Han Z. Park 7704 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Address LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR It has come to the attention of the building division that there is an addressing discrepancy at 7704 Olympic View Drive. Chapter 19.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code requires that the City correct all addressing errors or inconsistencies. The building division has concurred with the Fire Department that the correct address for your property is 7704 Olympic View Drive. As owner it is your responsibility to post the correct house numbers and indicate the correct address on your mailbox. If you are currently using a dual address please cease and use the correct house number. The Post Office and has guaranteed mail delivery to 7704 Olympic View Drive. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator cc: Utility Billing US Postmaster Police & Fire Departments • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • t Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 'i 4. • STREET FILE • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DR: HAN PARK GRADING PERMIT CU - 70 - 79 CITY OF EDMONDS PREPARED BY . MEYRING AND ASSOCIATES, INC 23423 HWY 99 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON . 778 -.3101 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and Phone Number of Propo ent 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checkli 5. Name of Proposal, if app 2 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: {�<<7��� T7�'YI ✓L'yl�YZ f!,/�Si Sl1/z✓s GJrC( f�f� �'�� 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Q�� of � ,��� �- � - � � e _ •� 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): ,17 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completea regarding Lne proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the natur of such application form: f� . c-, ._ `� • VV C �;2 -1- L�] • 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface x relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical Y1 features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b.- Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? -2- YES MAYBE NO ' c. Alterations to the course or flow X of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in body? _. any water e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ f. Alteration of the direction or rate flow of of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: proposal 4. Flora. Will the result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? d. RAution in acreage of any agri- (1 cultural crop? -3- I YES MAYBE NO 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement y of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: V, ..�C. 7ZGrc� 6. Noise. Wi 1 the proposal incread. existing noise levels? Explanation: �;' ��►`- <<� /� 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use f an area? Explanatiio_n: r�-C`� .. e' /G� 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal resu t in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable — natural resource? Explanatiou: r1,,.:. rj -4- V-1111111 ti-: YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal, alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing out sin9. or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. 'Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: -5- • 14. Public Services. Will the proposal, have an effect upon, or result..i.n.,a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? Explanation: C 15. Energy. Will the proposal resu in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of . energy, or require the development of new sources of ^energy? Explanation: z2Lt l • YES MAYBE NO i All in 16. Utilities. the proposal result a ne— eTT6r new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? _ f. Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: I XI (// l' !'C • III YES -MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding x mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to ....kl 41 \II AW? 19 Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? ah Explanation: qu U 20. Archeolo ical Historical. Will the p_roposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT: 4' -7- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DR. HAN PARK EXCAVATION Earth The proposal will result in the removal of approximately 33 M cubic yards of sandy earth materials, which will change the topography of the site. The objective of.the proposal is to remove the earth materials to the same elevation as the existing roadway, Olympic View Drive, which adjoins the instant property on the East. The leveling of the site will create a more useable tract of land for construction purposes than the tract in its present condition. The type of sandy material that exists on the site is highly desireable for backfill material on construction. projects. The removal of the earth materials in this proposal will in effect accomplish two objectives. 1. Provide a more suitable building site for future use. 2. Provide the construction industry with 'suitable fill mater- ial. - The completed project will leave stabilized slopes as de- picted in the Engineering Plans of 1� : 1 to 2 : 1, which are comparable to existing slopes in the Perrinville area. The stabilization of the final slopes will be accomplished by seeding with creeping red fescue and fertilizer. Air The proposal will create a temporary deterioration of ambient air quality. In order to remove the earth materials, heavy excavation and hauling equipment will be utilized. This equipment will consist of a diesel bucket loader and single or tandem dump trucks with diesel engines. The operation of the equipment will be carried on from 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. daily when there is a demand for the materials. Depending on the demand, the proposal is estimated to operate for approximately two years. All the equipment will be equipped with noise arrestors and emission control devices. Olympic Drive, which adjoins the property, is -a major arterial and carries a large amount of daily traffic, creating air emissions with a resultant deteriora- tion of ambient air quality in the vacinity and around the site area. The City of Edmonds maintains a mini -landfill operation on the east side of Olympic Drive immediately east of the pro- posal. Truck equipment is used to dump waste materials at this landfill site, which create air emissions and deterioration of ambient air quality. Water The impact of the proposal upon water related concerns will be negligble. Due to the soil characteristics, texture and composition, being composed generally of porous sand (USDA classification SW), there is no water present in any forms on the.proposed site that would be affected from this proposal. To eliminate any possibility of drainage water from an unusual rain storm flowing onto Olympic Drive, the floor of the proposal will be sloped away from the roadway to a siltation holding area along the westerly toe of the proposal. (See Engr. Plans) There may be a slight deterioration of the ground water from oil drippings from the operating equipment as,a result of .of the proposal. Maintenance and servicing of the equipment generally creates spillage of oils and diesel fuels which is absorbed by the sandy soils like a.mop. When such spillage occurs, action by the maintenance crews is taken to remove the spillage from the site to prevent the possibility of seepage into any unknown ground water reservoirs in the immed- iate vicinity, such as Brown's Creek, being located on the east side of Olympic Drive. Noise There may be sporadic increases to the existing noise level as a result of this proposal. Upon demand for the earth material:: loading and hauling equipment will be used in carrying out the required performance of the proposal. Increases of approximately 15 to 20 DBA's can be expected from this equipment, especially startups, above the existing level of noises experienced from automotive equipment using Olympic Drive adjoining the proposal site. Due to the topographic location of the site, the noise level may affect areas to the east. The increase in noise level can be mitigated through the use of mufflers. is Transportation The proposal will result in a generation of truck traffic onto Olympic `View Drive during the life time of the excavation. The equipment will consist of single and double tandem dump trucks carrying loads averaging 8 yards for single and 16 yards for double. The weight distribution of each vehicle meets the State Department of Transportation requirements for such equipment and does not impose an adverse impact on the surfacing of the haul route. The major haul route from the site will follow Olympic View Drive easterly approximately 3 miles to US 99 where the routing could change to southerly towards Lynnwood or northerly towards Everett. A second haul route from the site would follow Olympic View Drive easterly to its intersection with 76th Avenue W, approximately 1000 feet from the site, thence south on 76th Avenue West, approximately 1 mile to 196th SW, a Secondary State Highway, SR 524, connecting Lynnwood and Edmonds. (See Haul Route Exhibit) The haul routes described are presently being utilized by a variety of vehicles due to the existing developed land, principally, residential, but a small percentage being neighborhood community business around the intersection of 76th Avenue West and Olympic View Drive. The general area contains a high percentage of un- developed land that is being utilized through the normal growth process. The areas being developed and considered for development are in need of heavy equipment for clearing, grading and construct- ion materials requiring the use of trucks for hauling such items as machinery, building materials and in most cases, earth materials. In as much as 76th Avenue West and Olympic View"Drive are major arterials, these roads presently sustain a medium percentage of truck traffic such that the existing traffic volume would not be impacted by this proposal. The impacts that may affect the neighborhood a*ad lands along the haul"routes can be mitigated through proper maintenance pro- cedures and adherence to existing regulation pertaining to haul- ing equipment. In summary, the above discussion addresses those elements of the proposal that could have a major impact upon the neighborhood, but due to the growth pattern of the area and the general accept- ance by the public at large that trucking of materials is a nec- essity, are not significant enough to warrant any further dis- cussion. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE,OF WASHINGTON IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITY OF EDMONDS, Plaintiff, VS. (.HAN, _Z.._ PARK and REGINA PARK, ) husband and wife, ) Defendants. ) STREET FILE NO. 81-2-01135-5 AFFIDAVIT OF RHONDA MARCH RHONDA MARCH first being duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is the administrative assistant to the director of Public Works and has been at all times relevant to this suit. As admini- strative assistant she has custody of all records and files of the Department of Public Works, including those records when Jack Mitchell was director. Here affiant has diligently searched alr records in the Department of Public Works and cannot find the let- ter shown as Exhibit "D" to Han Park's affidavit purportedly dated January 12, 1982. on a Marc SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of February, 1984. NOTARY PUBLIC in an or the State of Washington, residing at i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON - IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITY OF EDMONDS, Plaintiff, ) vs. ) HAN Z. PARK and REGINA PARK, ) husband and wife, ) Defendants. ) NO. 81-2-01135-5 AFFIDAVIT OF RHONDA MARCH . RHONDA MARCH first being duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is the administrative assistant to the director of Public Works and has been at all times relevant to this suit.. As admini= strative assistant she has custody of all records and files of the Department of Public Works, including those records when Jack Mitchell was director. Here affiant has diligently searched all records in the Department of Public Works and cannot find the let- ter shown as Exhibit I'D" to Han Park's affidavit purportedly dated January 12, 1982; Furthermore, your affiant has access to personnel records show- ing when particular individuals in the department were on vacation. Records for the relevant year of 1981 show that Jack Mitchell was LAW OFFICES OF OGDEN, OGDEN & MURPHY Affidavit of Rhonda March - 1 2300 WESTIN BUILDING 2001 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121 (206) 622-2991 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 not on vacation in any part of August. The only time shown that Mr. Mitchell was on vacation was in the third week in October. Rhonda Marc SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of February, 1984. Affidavit of Rhonda March - 2 NOTARY PUBLIC in aHa for the State of Washington., residing at LAW OFFICES OF OGDEN. OGDEN & MURPHY 2300 WESTIN BUILDING 2001 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 (206) 622-2991 1 2 3 4 5 61 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23' 24 25 26 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITY OF EDMONDS, Plaintiff, ) NO. 81-2-01135-5 VS. ) AFFIDAVIT OF RHONDA MARCH HAN Z. PARK and REGINA PARK, ) husband and wife, ) Defendants. ) RHONDA MARCH first being duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is the administrative assistant to the director of Public Works and has been at all times relevant to this suit. As admini- strative assistant she has custody of all records and files of the Department of Public Works, including those records when Jack Mitchell was director. Here affiant has diligently searched all records in the Department of Public Works and cannot find the let- ter shown as Exhibit I'D" to Han Park's affidavit purportedly dated January 12, 1982. Furthermore, your affiant has access to personnel records show- ing when particular individuals in the department were on vacation. Records for the relevant year of 1981 show that Jack Mitchell was LAW OFFICES OF OGDEN, OGDEN & MURPHY Affidavit of Rhonda March - 1 2300 WESTIN BUILDING 2001 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 (206) 622-2991 e II 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 not on vacation in any part of August. The only time shown that Mr. Mitchell was on vacation was in the third week in October. Rhonda Marc SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of February, 1984. NOTARY PUBLIC in ana for the State of Washington, residing at LAW OFFICES OF Affidavit of Rhonda March - 2 OGDEN. OGDEN & MURPHY 2300 WESTIN BUILDING 2001 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 (206) 622-2991 S� REF` -; CITY F EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL June 9, 1983 D_r . Hann Park {_18314 Olympic View - Drive -Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Dr. Hann: SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF FILL AT 18300 - 76TH AVE. W. The City of Edmonds has been asked to clean up the property where we have the horse arena. In order for us to completely clean the area, we must remove the dirt located to the west side of the arena. G.R. Severson asked some time ago to dump waste material and stumps there when they were working for you. I indicated they could dump the material there as long as they would remove the stumps later. This was never done. If you still feel the dirt dumped on City property is yours, would you please remove this within thirty (30) days upon receipt of this letter. If at that time you have not done so, we will remove and clean up the stumps and fill to allow more parking space for those who use this facility. After the cleaning of this property, the City will post "No Dumping" signs around the property. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Acting Supt. of Public Works BRM/ml l iJ STROUD DT R C H DT IN • CITY OF EDM®N®S 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL May 17, 1983 Dr. Hann Park 23420 - 94th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Dr. Hann: 4 SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF FILL AT 1`83'00 76TH- AVE. W. HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR The City of Edmonds has been asked to clean up the property where we have the horse arena. In order for us to completely clean the area, we must remove the dirt located to the west side of the arena. G.R. Severson asked some time ago to dump waste material and stumps there when they were working for you. I indicated they could dump the material there as long as they would remove the stumps later. This was never done. If you still feel the dirt dumped on City property is yours, would you please remove this within thirty (30) days upon receipt of this letter. If at that time you have not done so, we will remove and clean up the stumps and fill to allow more parking space for those who use this facility. After the' cleaning of this property, the City will post "No Dumping" signs around the property. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Acting Supt. of Public Works BRM/ml s2 y --- L STROUD DT C T 19 STRELI rE September 30, 1982 MEMO TO: John Nordquist City Councilman FROM: James E. Adams City Engineer SUBJECT: HAN-Z. PARK-71.8314.OLYMPIC.VIEW,DRIVE% Mayor Harrison has asked me to respond to -your inquiry regarding Mr. Park. Attached is a copy of Mr. Park's letter to.Jack Mitchell dated August 1, 1981, anda copy..of our response, signed by Hal Reeves, dated August 20, 1981. Mr. Park has not responded to the August 20, 1981 letter. The problem with -Mr. Park has been ongoing for several years to include court actions. The City Attorney advised the staff to refer all contacts with Mr. Park to him. Mary Lou Block has a voluminous file regarding permits, stop work orders, court actions, etc. The file is.available in the Planning Department. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please call either myself or Mary Lou. JEA:rm Attachments CC: Mayor Harrison Mary Lou Block clack=Mtche-1=1� 0 E Mr. Jack Mitchell, Acting Director. Public v!orks Department • August 1, 1981 �j RECEIVED •1981 � ���' AUG Dir. u orks ,. City of Edmonds, City Hall Edmonds, `dA 98020 Dear Mr. Mitchell ! This is to request a comprehensive written instruction for the revisions of.+1�;.:,; ` an application for the grading permit (800314) and relocation permit (M-4-80):' As you may be aware that the revised application for the permits has been;i ; �•� ordered by the Superior Court of 'Snohomish County on July27, 1981 by Judge ;•. Daniel Kershner. The previously submitted plank including the drawings !of •,.l; ; �;' ,r,a July 16, 1981, preliminary plan two, and reclamation plan have, all been, {, ; examined during the course of the hearing; and trial and all have been accept ed as valid documents. The presiding judges•'include Judge Bibb,, -Judge Britt,'' and Judge Kershner of the Superior. Courts. :,.I { It is imperative that we receive a complete (or comprehensive)' written in j, struction by all the offices involved in this, rmatter. The instructions should be accompanied with the appropriate city code or regulations as a supporting document. Our intention is to follow the instructions to theI; letter in order to avoid any future misunderstandings. Since the original �' .;; .' permits were based on the application prior to the recent changes of the city code, we trust that the instructions be based on the customary practices' of that time. r!e also request that you permit us to examine and copy the files so that we could follow the previous examples which has been applied ;,; ;• and permitted in the city. ',�e are also in need of a revision of a relocation permit for the rental home ,al on the site and would appreciate the ins ructions for the relocation of the 2uilding and the utilities for the property. It would be appreciated if this .request be processed expeditiously without ;'''.'I any delay so that the project be resumed immediately. Sincere],y yours,/ I � Ha ark l i �... ,; • . Edmonds-, WA 98020 � copy to: Mary Fung Koehler, Attorney i_ I ,. �� I o� � y pR. r>0 r p . +,✓ cili W J 3"`.% i� � S. J S r ti. i � �41�,p` ro of ;n «� a f r'' •ro � Ik�� a �` -l..�s'�� —.... — (` e �- �'�",,j gam, e �'g ° r��., ° + y'• Pa � E' F b Vo, § a T, tl tl ""DD A a �1.� J'� a• y ��� �F n{ �tu"b ".3� oQg¢"�,� � .e���� `"OL•��r �r� ���a°��, vb �a;'���y"s�;�;� "r' �;,a ec�'d �N �r,�° fi {. �'a'Lar(�'�,oa� Ax r�°`3) CI'T Y ®F E®MOIMOS HARVE H. HARRISON -. MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS• WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 PLANNING DEPARTMENT / D� August 20, 1981 Mr. Han Z. Park 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Enclosed is the information requested in your August 1, 1981 letter to Jack Mitchell. The code requirements are those in effect at the time of your original permit applications. Your revised plans must be reviewed and approved in writing prior to re -commencing any work on the site. If there are further questions, please contact the Planning Department. -� Q,� a-�.{. • �,�; �-�?-- ' HAROLD REEVES Building Official HR/mt Enclosures 1) MEmo to Hal Reeves from James Adams, with attachments, dated August 11, 1981. 2) Memo to Hal Reeves from Mary Lou Block, with attachments, dated. August 20, 1981. 3) Letter from Harold Reeves, with attachments, in regard to relocation permit and foundation permit dated August 20, 1981. u �j- EDMONOS CITY COUNCIL CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9W20 - (206) 775-2525 September 21, 1982 To: Mayor Harve Harrison From: John Nordqui Councilman Subject: As follows 5 I received a telephone call from former Councilman Dr. Bob Anderson. He indicated he had no contact in the Public Works/ Engineering area and asked if I would pursue this concern. Recently he had talked with a Mr. Hon Park. If I am not mistaken he had some court action with him regarding his property in the Perrinville area. He indicated to Dr. Bob that he had written a letter to the Public Works/Engineering depprtment a year ago and had never received a letter. This seems unusual for this.depart- ment I believe, in any event this is his allegation. Secondly, he made.the statement to Dr. Bob that he thinks that someone from this depart- ment - Public Works/Engineering is in consort with his engineer or contractor and are in fact stealing gravel from him. I mentioned to Bob I would -send the comments along. S \ O�Qub�1c*°TKS 01� Q�?J/A•euiLO-�.f2�d �h, �6G' �/n.�/iy¢�+. � 6�i�rn. ail! ROM THE DESK OF i HARVE HARRISON 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER • STREET FILE May 6, 1982 Queen City Savings & Loan Association. 1155 North 130th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 Attention: Loraine Sample Dear Ms. Sample: SUBJECT: HANS Z. PARK-`18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE- HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Reference your letter dated April 20, 1982. Attached are copies of the Official Street Map, the City easement map and the City code pertaining to the dedication of land for street purposes. The City now has easements across Mr. Park's property as shown on the easement map. The street shown as a dashed line across the property is proposed. It is part of our comprehensive plan and we will require the dedication and improvement of this road with any further development on Mr. Park's lot. I have no record of the twenty-five feet on either side of the proposed sixty -foot right-of-way which you discussed. .Possibly you are referring to the twenty-five foot set back requirement. The City requires that no building be constructed within twenty-five feet of the right-of-way. If you have any questions or if I can be of any further assistance to you, please telephone me at 771-3202. JEA:jkw Attachments Rhonda Mardh dt. Sincerely, S E. ADAMS, P.E. ity Engineer �1�41T Le T- 9 /,o I e 0 )q A 0- C y a, Ll. %- per- pl�l- Y, ��OTS its T ,AJ CAL I k - PLO T- PL C, Eric% rtyloac- % wvid-r- egram L-Ar - . G Queen City Savings AND LOAN ASSOCIATION April 20, 1982 City of Edmonds Public Works Department 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, -WA -98020 RE: Our Loan - Hans Z. Park 18314 Oympic View Drive Gentlemen: AP R 21 19-BZ Dir. Of Public Works We hold a note and Deed of Trust on the above property. The owner, Mr. Park, has contacted this office with regard to a proposed street right-of- way through his property. The title policy issued at the time the loan was granted in September 1976, shows an easement right of way for private road purposes. However, Mr. Park states that he was informed by the City of Edmonds that the road easement was sixty feet wide with twenty-five feet right-of-ways on either side. Considering that Mr. Park's property is approximately 212 x 205 feet, the 110 feet wide strip taken out of this property will certainly effect the security we have for our loan. We therefore, respectfully request that we be provided with a copy of the recorded easement showing how it will effect this property so we may take the proper action to protect our security. Attached is a legal description and copy of the plot plan. road on the plan. Sincerely, 4oan �ra4iineSale, Supervisor ervicing Department cjz5.5 Enclosures Please note the AURORA NORTH BRANCH 1155 North 130th Street, Seattle, Washington 98133 (206) 365-5700 2. Only the City Council may approve a dedication of park land to satisfy the requirements of Section 20.75.090 of this chapter. The Council may request a review and written recommendation 3. Any approval of a subdivision or lot line adjustment shall be conditioned on appropriate dedication of land for streets, including those on the Official Street Map and the preliminary plat. 1. Improvements which may be required include, but are not limited to, streets, curbs, pedestrian walks and bicycle paths, side- walks, street landscaping, water lines, sewage systems, drainage systems and underground utilities. 2. The person or body approving a,subdivision shall determine the improvements necessary to meet the purposes and requirements of this chapter, and the requirements of: a. Title 18, Public Works Requirements. b. Chapter 19.75, Fire Code, as to fire hydrants, water supply and access. This determination shall be based on the recommendations of the Community Development Director, the Public Works Director, and the Fire Chief. 3. The use of septic systems may be approved if all of the.fol- lowing conditions are met: a. It is more than 200 feet, multiplied by the number of lots in the proposed subdivision, from the nearest public sewer main to the nearest boundary of the land to be divided. b. The land to be divided is zoned RS-20. C. The Public Works Director and City Health Officer determine that soil, drainage and slope conditions are satisfactory for septic use and that all requirements of Section 248.96.090 of the Washington Administrative Code are met. 20.75.090 PARK LAND DEDICATION I A. Dedication or In -Lieu of Fee Required. Before or concurrent with the j approval of the final plat of any subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land, pay a fee in -lieu of dedication, or do a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes. 241 a 5 6 GO 4 oe2)lo , FIRS 2 7°12 ADD. 9 D RCS 3 5 181ST SW. SS,ST(1877069� 5 (ss,s clal7 5. , H ADMIRALTY HOMES ; -�o 6 17 8 182ON D Go ST. S.W. 7 i I, I 15 Alf- 55,ST(1871466)10'15' 5S, 5T(1438337) 5' 5S,j(/877os S5,5T(16770S S'10' SS,5T(18770G5)10' 13 n CITY PROP, �60 o / — 1v1 10 w ?5S,5T(la7l707Q 10' 131`.) NOT OPEN 60 11 12 51STO e703 5 HI EN 10 SS,ST(18770( 13 S'EAVIEW L 9 —� d. 14 SS,Sr(1877( 8 = 15 ,YO i 7 c 16 GL N 8 - 6 ai � I Iaaa. PARK IT 18 19 0 2i oIIIa 4DN 5 220.. 1 a 185 PLC SW 4 do 104 5 4 567 _67 a) 26 25 23 S. �• SEA o VIEW E. 10' 8-7-71 —+ a u o , m` n 11 80 50 60 15 9 8 6 y� a 39 28 27 16 1 10 7 38 29 26 17 14 �^ .. Q ,, •: qn,. s;�`;v�:�:,:'i ,°.�7�'r�..:y,.' ,'c .y ��4 ��•'d.?..'{ltia.,T::f" � I BA LCH, S J 13 ( N 1 i1l1Y`- i u Jf7�b°[lh, ril ?� J '^^.,r ,.z , ,l i E f 1'; 5j t u { '�, } x t p� 5k•t'�O �• 6 I r "� p•r; r• h _ i 37:. WM1 30 _ �' ►' W ai../' 1_flR i �.r•�"F � e� iFFFFFF •i'F '" �t $ik ��"`� � �J� � �,, 3) G4� I `r� � t t ,�. r' 7 i �" t .� ,r:il� y'' � f 4�;r�H ' ` �{ � t4�' � - � .1i � t � � � 4 ♦ Y t f'� I03 ( 5' � ri' 1,13!1,1�f b �"i; tSlt i'1 .v�o '7,r Q . L. • ' i I (I � t t Y� ' : , ,tt a� �51:� :.l 4 YR �`�%V:i.�'.° irfrliiu._Ar '`�1 8Z 64 p9 ,�• O` b �1 Of04 � 19-L9-5 -- p9 -- - d s o` 3 z :pN 'S N� N3N 1S3a04 L . 5� bZ �Z 9Z ? Nadi ` o Z H15g1 s�cx��s ZZ L 01 1� .01 1 91 -.1 O 91 -4 L c pZ C,1 t7 6 01 £1 01 9 9 o� .° ; 1 ON Co I 1 n e° S -41 1 01 d -� d 1 n 9 cc co nd Q ,d ` y. txs ::- CITY OF PUBLIC WORKS E-DMONDS DEPARTMENT TO: 6WQ o Q SUSPENSE DATE: # SUPERINTENDENT Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare letterimemo for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR BUILDING & GROUNDS FOREMAN UTILITY BILLING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOREMAN STREET DIVISION FOREMAN WATER/SEWER FOREMAN TREATMENT PLANT FOREMAN COMMENTS: Now FROM: DATE:// j S 0 C 4 I � _ Sd rC- JO� o � o ID 0 (n . 0 N 0 COC) - (J1 C7 N 4 0�N 4�1 cnzacn A 0�°--i D 00 z � N J 1 e R C CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 rF—Crsf,vz-L .! P<' 0�' T kj November 15, 1981 v_ rJ The Hartford Pacific Northwest Regional Office 1820 Eastlake Avenue East P.O. Box 1875 Seattle, Washington 98111 Dear Ms. Muscutta Your letter of November 3 to Mr. Dial Reeves, Edmonds' Building Official, regarding a claim against the City of EcLionds filed by Dr. Han Z. Parr has been referred to our office because of the ,fie q 1__dircumstanees. This particular claim was the subject of -litigation in Snohomish County Superior Court, Cause Number 81-2-01135•-5. That case had heel filed by the City as an action to enjoin Dr. Park's excavation on his property without first properly obtaining a city permit. In response to the City's suit for an in- junction, Dr. Park filed a counter -claim for damages which is the same claim referred to by your letter of November 3, 1981. Judge Kershner dismissed this counter -claim without prejudice because Dr. Park failed to file a claim with the City at least 60 days before bringing his counter -claim in this particular action. The Judge field that this was "without prejudice", i.e. that an action might be brought on this claim in the futuo, even though taere is an argument that such an action would be barred since it was a compulsive counter -claim which should have been brought properly in the injunction action. Judge Kershner found that such a result would be unjust due to the accelerated nature of the injunction proceeding. nevertheless, this may be a defense to this par- ticular claim. I have enclosod a copy of the relevant portions of the Judge's ruling. The Hartford November 16, 1981 Page Two By copy of this letter, I am advising Mr. Hal Reeves, the Edmonds Building Official, and Mr. Bobby Mills, the Edmonds Street Superintendent, that they should provide whatever information is necessary for your investigation of this claim. If you have any further questions regarding this case, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTOPUEY Mark A. Eames MAS/ka Laclosure cc: dal Reeves, Building Official / Bobby Hills, Street Superintendent,/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ST IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH CITY OF EDMONDS, Plaintiff, vs HAN Z. PARK, Defendant. No. 81-2-01135-5 COURV S ORAL RULING Honorable Daniel T. Kershner Department 1 Snohomish County Courthouse Everett, Washington July 27, 1981 APPEARANCES: On behalf of -the -Plaintiff: On behalf of the Defendant: Wayne Tanaka Mary Koehler REPORTED BY: Judie Merryman -Nicholas Official Court Reporter Snohomish County Courthouse Everett, Washington 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0 0 0 0 3 a 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 represented he was going to proceed, with the exceptio of the notation of 2,000 yards. That exact amount of yardage may have been unknown or not disclosed. I question whether Mr. Park knew the exact amount of yardage at the time of the issuance of the conditional use permit. I would have.to find that he'did know it was going to exceed the 2,000 square yards. I can only conclude that his representation of 2,000, in his mind, at least, was modified by the "or more." Under all of .the circumstances, I feel the City has failed, when considered in light of all that was known to the City at that time,'to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the conditional use permit was improperly issued. MS. KOEHLER: Your Honor, what about Mr. Park's counterclaim? THE COURT: Well, in view of the fact that Mr. Park had the responsibility of obtaining the engineering drawings, should the removal exceed 5,000 yards, he is, in fact, in violation of that portion of the ordinance. The injunction that I'm allowing to remain in effect is by virtue of his failure to comply with the law, so there is no damage by virtue of the injunction. As far as the other damages alleged, it's a difficult question to reconcile, but I think that the City is correct in 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 r 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 their position that the Court is not able to determine that issue because of the claim filing requirements of the City of Edmonds. Therefore, that counterclaim is going to.have to be dismissed without prejudice. Now; I say without prejudice because it's inconceivable to me that the City, by their action, can force the Def- endant into a position where he in no way could presery his right to damages. I have not concluded he's entitled to any damages in the first place. In fact, I have a serious question whether he is. However, by an injunctive action such as this where the Court has given special consideration to an early trial date, a Defendant could find it impossible to pursue a counter- claim. If he,::.as in this case, failed to file his claim before filing his counterclaim, he is subjected to a motion to dismiss with prejudice. If he fails to file a counterclaim and it's a mandatory counterclaim, he is subject to a motion to dismiss. So either way he goes, he's going to be out, and,I feel that that's not what the law is or should be in a case such as this. The City instituted the action, necessitating haste in getting the matter heard to avoid damages to either side and under those circumstances; I think that claim statute is applicable but does not entitle the City to a dismissal with prejudice. 5 Pacific Northwest Regional Office 1820 Eastlake Avenue East P.O. Box 1875 Seattle, Washington 98111 Telephone: (206) 325-8600 November 3, 1981 City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Building Department RE: Our Insured: City of Edmonds Our File Number: 932 LP 67888 Date of Loss: 2/19/81 Claimant: Han Z. Park Dear Mr. Reeves: UU-2CE ED NOV r 198t_ S Du. ut Public Works. THE HARTFORD NOV 4 RECo . STREET, In regards to the above claim where the City of Edmonds allegedly removed fill sand and screened sand from claimant's job site at 18314 Olympic View Drive and stockpile lot eight and nine block two Admiralty Acres, Edmonds. The City says all they took was waste dirt given to them by Dr. Park's contractor. It appears that several departments in the City were involved with this site and perhaps this letter should be going to a different department. We would like all the records pertaining to the removal of this dirt from 9/3/80 to 6/16/81) name of person with City who got the permission to remove ,dirt, were they given any specific location as to where they could take dirt ,---from, and names ofwdrivers of trucks for City and all records you have -on- this_:.. may If I have forwarded this letter to the wrong department, please forward to the correct department. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Ve ---t y yours, \ Hartford Accident and I emnity Company Patt Muscutt, Claim Representative Seattle Local Claims, Seattle, Washington 1-1-W 1116 /,/- O TY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC. WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: SUSPENSE DATE: �Q z o # SUPERINTENDENT Investigate and Report OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR Take Appropriate Action BUILDING & GROUNDS FOREMAN Prepare UTILITY BILLING letter/memo for my signature EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOREMAN For Information STREET DIVISION FOREMAN Previously Ref'd WATERISEWER FOREMAN Status of Action? Return to: TREATMENT PLANT FOREMAN COMMENTS: I FROM: >�:--- DATE: -S I CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO:STREET F SUSPENSE DAT Z) Q P � ll �3 O a z of DIRECTOR 1/ Investigate and Report ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY Take Appropriate Action BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPT. re let 4memo / or my signature CITY ENGINEER EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPT. For Information STREET DIVISION SUPT. Previously Ref'd WATERISEWER SUPT. Status of Action? Return to: TREATMENT PLANT SUPT. COMMENTS: k- FRO DATE: f P W A-0001.11.78 Pacific Northwest Regional Office 1820 Eastlake Avenue East P.O. Box 1875 Seattle, Washington 98111 Telephone: (206) 325-8600 November 3, 1981 City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Building Department RE: Our Insured: City of Edmonds Our File Number: 932 LP 67.888 Date of Loss: 2/19/81 Claimant: Han Z: Park Dear Mr. Reeves: RECEFIVED C'10' G 1981 ublic Works m � THE HARTFORD 4 RECb In regards to the above claim where the:City of Edmonds allegedly removed fill sand and screened sand from claimant's job site at 18314 Olympic View Drive and stockpile lot eight and nine block two Admiralty Acres, Edmonds. The City says all they took was waste dirt given to them by Dr. Park's contractor. It appears that several departments in the City were involved with this site and perhaps this letter should be going to a different department: We would like all the records pertaining to the removal of this dirt from 9/3/80 to 6/16/8l,-name of person with City who got the permission to remove dirt, were they given any specific location as to where they could take dirt from,. and names of drivers of trucks for City and all records you may have on this. If I have forwarded this letter to the -wrong -department, please forward to the correct department. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Ve y yours, O Hartford Accident and In 'ty Company Patt Muscutt; Claim Representative Seattle Local Claims,. Seattle,_Washingt= rn :i r, t: i a , To: Date 9) Q FOR YOUR COMMENTS ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FgR YOUR APPROVAL ElNOTE & RETURN M-IAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ❑ NOTE & FILE ❑ CALL ME ❑ FOR YOUR SIGNATURE ❑ SEE ME ❑ ❑ REPLY & SEND ME COPY ❑ oil. Ot Pubft WorKs 1. t File copy August 11, 1981 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves STD Building Official T FILE . LE FROM: James E. Adams Acting Director Public Works SUBJECT: GRADING PERMIT FOR 18314 O.V.D. This memo supplies information in response to Mr. Park's letter of.August 1, 1981, regarding the subject permit. Mr. Park's letter: requested complete (.or comprehensive) written.instructions from all offices involved together with appropriate code or regulation references. This'memo provides instructions and guidelines for the subject project only for aspects of the permit application reviewed by the Engineering.Division. Specific instructions regarding the grading permit, at the time of original application, are contained in; the Uniform Building.Code (UBC), 1976,. Chapter 70; Ordinance 1714; and Ordinance 1924. Copies of these documents .are enclosed and all of their requirements must be met. To facilitate satisfactory compliance with the.re- quirements, we can provide the following additional guide- lines. UBC Chapter 70 7006 (c) Plans are to prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a Civil Engineer (see also.7014 (b) ). On 7006 (d) The scale used is to be on engineering scale at 1 inch equals 20 feet or less and is to show the entire properties comprising the site. 7006 (d) 2 Contours must include those for the site as it now exists. A five-foot contour internal is suggested. The drainage area is the area of land who,'s surface drainage does or could enter the site. The drainage area is to be shown on map of appropriate scale. (1-inch equals 200 feet is commonly used). 7006 (.d) 3 Finish contours are required, again, a five foot contour interval would be appropriate. 5 ? MEMO TO HAL RF 7 L PAGE 2. ,AUGUST 11, 198 . f UBC Chapter 70 7006 (d) ' 4 The. nature of detailed plans cannot be elaborated upon without knowledge of the devices, etc. 7009 (b) & (c) Note the cut' slope requirements and terracing requirements. 7010 If 'filling is now required, it must conform to this section. 7011 Note setback requirements. ,�7012 Note drainage and terracing requirements. .;7012 (d) Drainage outlet lines are to.be tied to a'.catch basin located within the site.' The catch basin is to .,have one-gasketed, concrete pipe at least 8-inches in diameter (at least 12 inches. in diameter.if over, 40 feet long) connected to a City catch basin. An infiltration;system'may be approved'in lieu of the piped connection depending the specific location and design of such system. 7012 (e) Interceptor drains are required above cut slopes where,a��� surface drainage does or could flow over the guided % ✓ surfaces. Drainage outlet lines are'discussed`above. 7013 Note requirements for.erosion control.. The material at the site is not considered erosion -resistant. 70141(b) The,�subject project is considered "engineered grading Note the requirements of this entire section.' Note responsibilities for professional inspection and approval. Ordinance 1924 Section 3, (2) Computations are defined. Section 3, (3) For tributary drainage areas less than 50 acres, the return period is to be 10 years. If over 50 acres, the return period is to be 25 years. In both cases, the duration for peak flow computations is to be the time of concentration. For storage computations, the ,duration'.can be computed using the Yrjaninen & Warren Method. r _' i" ; ' MEMO TO HAL RES .. , PAGE 3 AUGUST .11, 1981 Ordinance 1924 Section 5 Requirements for drainage plan contents. Section 6 ' Requirements for drainage improvements. Section 11. The City hereby foregoes assumption of maintenance. Section 14 Guidelines provided in either the King County or Snohomish County Drainage'Guideline Manual are generally acceptable within the City of Edmonds. Ordinance 1714 11:02.030 !Drainage and grading requirements Note entire ;section.- Protection of adjoining property includes :provision of a swale, or other facility, to: (1) intercept any potential surface water otherwise leaving the site from graded areas.;,(2) conduct 3 the runoff through a sediment control: device (.such as straw -bale filters); and discharging as described in our comments for UBC 7012 (d), above. The sediment control device must be.maintained until permanent erosion control is operational, , and'a note to this -effect must be on the plans. ng Director Public Works BF:ges Enclosures QV FRACKLIN DT. RCH . e3 = s a5 .4 a l 3 �t -- l • i t 1976 EDITION APPENDIX Chapter 70 EXCAVATION AND GRADING Purpose Sec. 7001. The purpose of this Chapter is to safeguard life, limb, prop- erty and the public welfare by regulating grading on private property. Scope .. _ _.. Sec. 7002. This -Chapter sets forth rules and regulations to control ex- cavation, grading and earthwork construction, including fills and em- bankments; establishes the administrative procedure for issuance of per- mits; and provides for approval of plans and inspection of grading con- struction. - Permits Required Sec. 7003. No person shall do any grading without first having obtained a grading permit from the Building Official except for the following: 1. Grading in an isolated, self contained area if there is no danger ap- parent to private or public property. 2. An excavation below finished grade for basements and footings of a building, retaining wall or other structure authorized by a valid building permit. This shall not exempt any fill made with the material from such ex- cavation nor exempt any excavation having an unsupported height greater than 5 feet after the completion of such structure. 3. Cemetery graves. 4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other regulations. 5. Excavations for wells or tunnels or utilities. 6. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing, stockpiling of rock, sand, gravel, aggregate or clay where established and provided for by law pro- vided such operations do not affect the lateral support or increase the stresses in or pressure upon any adjacent or contiguous property. 7. Exploratory excavations under the direction of soil engineers or engineering geologists. 8. An excavation which (a) is less than 2 feet in depth, or (b) which does not create a cut slope greater than 5 feet in height and steeper than one and one-half horizontal to one vertical. 9. A fill less than I foot in depth, and placed on natural terrain with a slope flatter than five horizontal to one vertical, or less than 3 feet in depth, not intended to support structures, which does not exceed 50 cubic yards on any one lot and does not obstruct a drainage course. Hazards 7. Sec. 7004. Whenever the Building Official determines that any existing excavation or embankment or fill on private property has become a hazard • to life and limb, or endangers property, or adversely affects the safety, use 677 t,. APPENDIX UNIFORM BUILDING CODE or stability of a public way or drainage channel, the owner of the property upon which the excavation or fill is located, or other person or agent in control of said property, upon receipt of notice in writing from the Building Official shall within the period specified therein repair or eliminate such excavation or embankment so as to eliminate the hazard and be in conformance with the requirements of this Code. Definitions Sec. 7005. For the purposes of this Chapter the definitions listed hereunder shall be construed as specified in this Section. q APPROVAL shall mean a written engineering or geological opinion e; ?� concerning the progress and completion of the work. AS -GRADED is the surface conditions extent on completion of grading. BEDROCK is in -place solid rock. BENCH is a relatively level step excavated into earth material on which fill is to be placed. BORROW is earth material acquired from an off -site location for use in grading on a site. CIVIL ENGINEER shall mean a professional engineer registered in the state to practice in the field of civil works. CIVIL ENGINEERING shall mean the application of the knowledge of the forces of nature, principles of mechanics and the properties of materials to the evaluation, design and construction of civil works for the beneficial uses of mankind. COMPACTION is the densification of a fill by mechanical means. EARTH MATERIAL is any rock, natural soil or fill and/or any com- bination thereof. ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST shall mean a geologist experienced and knowledgeable in engineering geology. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY shall mean the application of geologic knowledge and principles in the investigation and evaluation of naturally occurring rock and soil for use in the design of civil works. EROSION is the wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind, water and/or ice. EXCAVATION is the mechanical removal of earth material. FILL is a deposit of earth material placed by artificial means. GRADE shall mean the vertical location of the ground surface. EXISTING GRADE is the grade prior to grading. ROUGH GRADE is the stage at which the grade approximately con- forms to the approved plan. FINISH GRADE is the final grade of the site which conforms to the approved plan. 678 1976 EDITION APPENDIX GRADING is any excavating or filling or combination thereof. KEY is a designed compacted fill placed in a trench excavated in earth material beneath the toe of a proposed fill slope. SITE is any lot or parcel of land or contiguous combination thereof, under the same ownership, where grading is performed or permitted. SLOPE is an inclined ground surface the inclination of which is express- ed as a ratio of horizontal distance to vertical distance. SOIL is naturally occurring surficial deposits overlying bed rock. SOIL ENGINEER shall mean a civil engineer experienced and knowledgeable in the practice of soil engineering. SOIL ENGINEERING shall mean the application of the principles of soil mechanics in the investigation, evaluation and design of civil works in- volving the use of earth materials and the inspection and testing of the construction thereof. TERRACE is a relatively level step constructed in the face of a graded slope surface for drainage and maintenance purposes. Grading Permit Requirements Sec. 7006. (a) Permits Required. Except as exempted in Section 7003 of this Code, no person shall do any grading without First obtaining a grading permit from the Building Official. A separate permit shall be re- quired for each site, and may cover both excavations and fills. (b) Application. The provisions of Section 301 (b) are applicable to grading and in addition the application shall state the estimated quantities of work involved. (c) Plans and Specifications. When required by the Building Official, each applicant for a grading permit shall be accompanied by two. sets of plans and specifications, and supporting data consisting of a soil engineer- ing report and engineering geology report. The plans and specifications shall be prepared and signed by a civil engineer when required by the Building Official. (d) Information on Plans and in Specifications. Plans shall be drawn to scale upon substantial paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient clarity to in- dicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that they will conform to.the provisions of this Code and all relevant laws, or- dinances, rules and regulations. The first sheet of each set of plans shall give the location of the work and the.name and address of the owner and the person by whom they were prepared. The plans shall include the following information: 1. General vicinity of the proposed site. 107 2. Property limits and accurate contours of existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage. 3. Limiting dimensions, elevations or finish contours to be achieved by the grading, and proposed drainage channels and related construction. 679 Cl APPENDIX UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 4. Detailed plans of all surface and subsurface drainage devices, walls, cribbing, dams and other protective devices to be constructed with, or as a part of, the proposed work together with a map showing the drainage area and the estimated runoff of the area served by any drains. S. Location of any buildings or structures on the property where the - work is to be performed and the location of any buildings or structures on land of adjacent owners which are within IS feet of the property or which may be affected by the proposed grading operations. Specifications shall contain information covering construction and material requirements. (e) Soil Engineering Report. The soil engineering report required by subsection (c) shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures and design criteria for corrective measures when necessary, and opinions and recommendations covering adequacy of sites to be developed by the proposed grading. Recommendations included in the report and approved by the Building Official shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications. (f) Engineering Geology Report. The engineering. geology report re- quired by subsection (c) shall include an adequate description of the geology of the site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development, and opinions and recommendations covering the adequacy of sites to be developed by the proposed grading. Recommendations included in the report and approved by the Building Official shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications. (g)Issuance. The provisions of Section 302 are applicable to grading permits. The Building Official may require that grading operations and project designs be modified if delays occur which incur weather generated problems not considered at the time the permit was issued. Fees Sec. 7007. (a) Plan -checking Fee. For excavation and fill on the same site, the fee shall be based on the volume of the excavation or fill, whichever is greater. Before accepting a set of plans and specifications for checking, the Building Official shall collect a plan -checking fee. Separate permits and fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as indicated elsewhere in this Code. There shall be no separate charge for standard terrace drains and similar facilities. The amount of the plan - checking fee for grading plans shall be as set forth in Table No. 70-A. The plan -checking fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between such fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project. (b) Grading Permit Fees. A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in Table No. 70-B. 680 1976 EDITION r.� s i.v f�. w .APPENDIX TABLE NO. 70-A— PLAN -CH ECKING FEES 50 cubic yards 'or less..........................................................No Fee 51 to 100 cubic yards .... :........ .................... ................ .........$10.00 101 to I000 cubic yards......................................................... 15.00 1001 to 10,000 cubic yards .................................................... 20.00 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards — $20.00 for the first I0,000 cubic yards plus $10.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards — $110.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $6.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards or more — $170.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus $3.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. TABLE NO. 70•13—GRADING PERMIT FEES 50 cuhic yards or less............................................................S10.00 51 to 100 cubic yards............................................................ 15.00 101 to 1000 cubic yards — $15.00 for the first 100 cubic yards, plus $7.00 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1001 to 10,000 cubic yards — $78.00 for the first 1000 cubic yards, plus $6.00 for each additional 1000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards — $132.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $27.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more — $375.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $15.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. r f ` The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a m valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project. Pe P J Bonds Sec. 7008. Bonds. The Building Official may require bonds in such g form and amounts as may be deemed necessary to assure that the work, if not completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, gill be corrected to eliminate hazardous conditions. <` In lieu of a surety bond the applicant may file a cash bond or instrument of credit with the Building Official in an amount equal to that which would be required in the surety bond. 681 % - �r,.,.,�: sj tom_`-_°' ..:t�.. "� `,•S t 1-0i::.,.� APPENDIX UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Cuts Sec. 7009. (a) General. Unless otherwise recommended in the approved soil engineering and/or engineering geology report cuts shall conform to. ! the provisions of this Section.. .::j (b) Slope. The slope of cut surfaces shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use.'Cut slopes shall be no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical. r (c) Drainage and Terracing. Drainage and terracing shall be provided as required by Section 7012. Fills Sec._7010. (a) General. Unless otherwise recommended in the approved soil engineering report fills shall conform to the provisions of this Sec- tion. In the absence of an approved soil engineering report these provisions may be waived for minor fills not intended to support structures. (b) Fill Location. Fill slopes shall not be constructed on natural slopes steeper than two to one. ":... (c) Preparation of Ground. The ground surface shall be prepared to receive fill by removing vegetation, noncomplying fill, top -soil and other <s unsuitable materials scarifying to provide a bond with the new fill, and, where slopes are steeper than five to one, and the height is greater than. 5 feet, by benching into sound bedrock or other competent material as deter -...- mined by the soils engineer. The bench under the toe of a fill on a slope:". steeper than five to one shall be at least 10 feet wide. The area beyond the toe of fill shall be sloped for sheet overflow or a paved drain shall be pro- vided. Where fill is to be placed over a cut, the bench under the toe of fill shall be at least 10 feet wide but the cut must be made before placing fill _ and approved by the soils engineer and engineering geologist as a suitable• foundation for fill. Unsuitable soil is soil which, in the opinion of the'✓ Building Official or the civil engineer or the soils engineer or the geologist, is not competenf to support other soil or fill, to support structures or to satisfactorily perform the other functions for which the soil is intended. (d) Fill Material. Detrimental amounts of organic material shall not be permitted in fills. Except as permitted by the Building Official, no rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 12 in-'.-.'.':) ches shall be buried or placed in fills. EXCEPTION: The Building Official may permit placement of larger rock when the soils engineer properly devises a method of placement, continuously inspects its placement and approves the fill stability. The following condi- tions shall also apply: A. Prior to issuance of the Grading Permit, potential rock disposal areas shall be delineated on the grading plan. B. Rock sizes greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension shall be 10 ' feet or more below grade, treasured vertically. C. Rocks shall be placed so as to assure filling of all voids with fines. �-----�� - 682 1976 EDITION APPENDIX (e) Compaction. All fills shall be compacted to a minimum of 90 per- cent of maximum'dens_ity as determined by U.B.C. Standard No. 70-1. Field density -shall. be determined in accordance with U.B.C. Standard _ No. 70-2 or equivalent as approved by the Building Official. (f) Slope. The slope.of fill surfaces shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use. Fill slopes shall be no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical. (g) Drainage and Terracing. Drainage and terracing shall be provided and the area above fill slopes and the surfaces of terraces shall be graded r{ 4 and paved as required by Section 7012. Setbacks-=— ---- - - - - - -- - Sec. 7011. (a) General. The setbacks and other restrictions specified by r' this Section are minimum and may be increased by the Building Official or by the recommendation of a civil engineer, soils engineer or engineering ; geologist, if necessary for safety and stability or to prevent damage of ad- jacent properties from deposition or erosion or to provide access for slope ���aintenance and drainage. Retaining walls may be used to reduce the re- • Uquired setbacks when approved by the Building Official. (b) Setbacks from Property Lines. The tops of cuts and toes of fill slopes shall be set back from the outer boundaries of the permit area, in- cluding slope right areas and easements, in accordance with Figure No. I , and Table No. 70-C. (c) Design Standards for Setbacks. Setbacks between graded slopes (cut ? or fill) and structures shall be provided in accordance with Figure No. 2 and Table No. 70-C. PA Toe I Slope L. Natural or Finish Grade *Permit Area Boundary PA* Top of slope h Natural or Finish Grade Cut or Fill t Slope H FIGURE 1 683 ..tin-:.'+::'-�-c:.-_-.—.-:¢:a - �. •• cw:a�.sac-:�•f.,r- �*-^.'`_-"'-r�<�...,...:....-„a ..�,.....�..,�s•-,�...-.-_..., - c^. APPENDIX UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE NO.70•C REQUIRED SETBACKS FROM PERMIT AREA BOUNDARY ON FEET) SETBACKS H a b' Under 5 0 1 5-30 H/2 H/5 Over 30 15 6 'Additional width may be required for interceptor drain. Face of Footing Top of slope Face of Structure 1 roe or Slope � H/2 but need not exceed 10' Max. H/2 but need not exceed IS' Max. FIGURE 2 Drainage and Terracing' Sec. 7012. (a) General. Unless otherwise indicated on the approved grading plan, drainage facilities and terracing shall conform to the provi- sion of this Section. (b) Terrace. Terraces at least 6 feet in width shall be established at not; more than 30-foot vertical intervals on all cut or fill slopes to control sur ,__,.� €`? face drainage and debris except that where only one terrace is required, it shall be at mid -height. For cut or fill slopes greater than 60 feet and up to 120 feet in vertical height one terrace at approximately mid -height shall be x 12 feet in width. Terrace widths and spacing for cut and fill slopes greater f than 120 feet in height shall be designed by the civil engineer and approved <+ by the Building Official. Suitable access shall be provided to permit proper cleaning and maintenance. 4_ Swales or ditches on terraces shall have a minimum gradient of 5 percent and must be paved with reinforced concrete not less than 3 inches in thickness or an approved equal paving. They shall have a minimum depth at the deepest point of 1 foot and a minimum paved width of 5 feet. A single run of Swale or ditch shall not collect runoff from a tributary area exceeding 13,500 square feet (projected) without discharging into down drain. (c) Subsurface Drainage. Cut and fill slopes shall be.provided with sub- surface drainage as necessary for stability. 684 1976 EDITION APPENDIX (d) Disposal. All drainage facilities shall. be designed to carry waters to 1 the nearest practicable drainage way approved by the Building Official wand/or other appropriate jurisdiction as a safe place to deposit such aters. Erosion of ground in the area of discharge shall be prevented by installation of non -erosive downdrains or other devices. Building pads shall have a drainage gradient of 2 percent toward ap- proved drainage facilities, unless waived by the Building Official. EXCEPTION: The gradient from the building pad may be one percent if all of the following conditions exist throughout the permit area: A. No proposed fills are greater than 10 feet in maximum depth. . ` B. No proposed finish cut or fill slope faces have a vertical height in excess of-10 feet... C. No existing slope faces, which have a slope face steeper than 10 horizontally to I vertically, have a vertical height in excess of 10 feet. (e) Interceptor Drains. Paved interceptor drains shall be installed along the top of all cut slopes where the tributary drainage area above slopes �`. towards the cut and has a drainage path greater than 40 feet measured N r` orizontally. Interceptor drains shall be paved with a minimum of 3 inches `Z`144 concrete or gunite and reinforced. They shall have a minimum depth of 12 inches and a minimum paved width of 30 inches measured horizontally f. across the drain. The slope of drain shall be approved by the Building Of- ficial. Erosion Control z Sec. 7013. (a) Slopes. The faces of cur and fill slopes shall be prepared and maintained to control against erosion. This control may consist of ef- fective planting. The protection for the slopes shall be installed as soon as practicable and prior to calling for final approval. Where cut slopes are tot subject to erosion due to the erosion -resistant character of the inaterials, such protection may be omitted. (b) Other,Devices. Where necessary, check dams, cribbing, riprap or other devices or methods shall be employed to control erosion and provide safety. Grading Inspection Sec. 7014. (a) General. All grading operations for which a permit is re- quired shall be subject to inspection by the Building Official. When re- quired by the -Building Official, special inspection of grading operations and special testing shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Section 305 and subsection 7014 (c). (b) Grading Designation. All grading in excess of 5000 cubic yards shall be performed in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by a " . ivil engineer, and shall be designated as "engineered grading." Grading /'involving less than 5000 cubic yards shall be designated "regular grading" unless the permittee, with the approval of the Building Official chooses to have the grading performed as "engineered grading." . - :. '-'q APPENDIX UNIFORM BUILDING CODE v (c) Engineered Grading Requirements. For engineered grading, it shall be the responsibility of the civil engineer who prepares the approved grading plan to incorporate all recommendations from the soil engineering - and engineering geology reports into the grading plan. He shall also be:. �. gresponsible for the professional inspection and approval of the gradingk-•• s.r within his area of technical specialty. This responsibility shall include, but need not be limited to, inspection and approval as to the establishment of s:< line, grade and drainage of the development area. The civil engineer shall act as the coordinating agent in the event'the need arises for liason between x the other professionals, the contractor, and the Building Official. The civil engineer shall also be responsible for the preparation of revised plans;gip and the submission of as -graded grading plans upon completion of the-t:_. work. The grading contractor shall submit in a form prescribed by the Building Official a statement of compliance to said as -built plan. Soil engineering and engineering geology reports shall be required as specified in Section 7006. During grading all necessary reports, compac- tion data and soil engineering and engineering geology recommendations shall be submitted to the civil engineer and the Building Official by the soil: ; engineer and the engineering geologist. The soil engineer's area of responsibility shall include, but need not be limited to, the professional inspection and approval concerning the preparation of ground to receive fills, testing for required compaction, stability of all finish slopes and the design of buttress fills, where required, incorporating data supplied by the engineering geologist. �: g The engineering geologist's area of responsibility shall include, but need not be limited to, professional inspection and approval of the adequacy of natural ground for receiving fills and the stability of cut slopes with respect to geological matters, and the need for subdrains or other ground water drainage devices. He shall report his findings to the soil engineer and., the civil engineer for engineering analysis. ,j The Building Official shall inspect the project at the various stages of the work requiring approval and at any more frequent intervals necessary to determine that adequate control is being exercised by the professional consultants. (d) Regular Grading Requirements. The Building Official may require inspection and testing by an approved testing agency. The testing agency's responsibility shall include, but need not be limited «i to, approval concerning the inspection of cleared areas and benches to receive fill, and the compaction of fills. When the Building Official has cause to believe that geologic factors may be involved the grading operation will be required to conform to , "engineered grading" requirements. (e) Notification of Noncompliance. If, in the course of fulfilling their;::' responsibility under this Chapter, the civil engineer, the soil engineer, the'"_.!_� engineering geologist or the testing agency finds that the work is not being done in conformance with this Chapter or the approved grading plans, the '686 :7 :4 a- 1976 EDITION APPENDIX discrepancies shall be reported immediately in writing to the person in charge of the grading work and to the Building Official. Recommenda- gpi for corrective measures, if necessary, shall be submitted. (f) Transfer of Responsibility for Approval. If the civil engineer, the soil engineer, the engineering geologist or the testing agency of record are changed during the course of the work, the work shall be stopped until the replacement has agreed to accept the responsibility within the area of their technical competence for approval upon completion of the work. Completion of Work - Sec. 7015. (a) Final Reports. Upon completion of the rough grading work and at the final completion of the work the Building Official may re- quire the following reports and drawings and supplements thereto: 1. An As -graded grading plan prepared by the civil engineer including original ground surface elevations, as -graded ground surface elevations, lot drainage patterns and locations and elevations of all surface and sub- surface drainage facilities. He shall provide approval that the work was done in accordance with. the final approved grading plan. - 2. A Soil Grading Report prepared by the soil engineer including loca- tions and -elevations of field density tests, summaries of field and laboratory tests and other substantiating data and comments on any changes made during grading and their effect on the recommendations made in the soil engineering investigation report. He shall provide ap- proval as to the adequacy of the site for the intended use. 3. A Geologic Grading Report prepared by the engineering geologist in- cluding a final description of the geology of the site including any new in- formation disclosed during the grading and the effect of same on recom- mendations incorporated in the approved grading plan. He shall provide •3 approval as to the adequacy of the site for the intended use as affected by geologic factors. (b) ;Notification of Completion. The permittee or his agent shall notify the Building Official when the grading operation is ready for final inspec- tion. Final approval shall not be given until all work including installation of all drainage facilities and their protective devices and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the final approved grading plan and the required reports have been submitted.- 687 0 • JUP� 3 0 1977 ORDINANCE .1. 1924 Put"% _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY C' F EMMONDS, I'IASHINGT„O:`:, ESTABLISHING A NE'1 CHAPTEl' 12.17 OF THE ED;IU^+[)S CITY CODE AND REQUIRING A DRAIN;,GE PLAN TO BE SULIM', I IN CONJUNCTION KITH CERTAIN PEMMITS, SPECIFYING THE CON- TENTS THEREOF, REQUIRING SURETY AND CASH BONDS, AUTHOR- IZING CITY ASSUMPTION OF RETENTION AND DETENTION FA- CILITIES. WHEREAS, an expanding city population and increased development of land will lead to drainage and runoff prob- lems unless adequate provision is made for the sane, and WHEREAS, these drainage and runoff problems contribute to increased siltation of the ponds, creeks, streams, thereby degrAding water quality, and S-lIIEREAS, inadequate drainage planning leads to erosion and concomitant property damage, and WHEREAS, excess water runoff coming upon streets and highways will pose a safety hazard to both lives and prop- erty, and WHEREAS, the city council finds that these problems could be resolved if developers gave careful consideration ,.to the.drainage of their property, no,j, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMMONDS, WASHIwG O11.' DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOVIS : Section 1. There is hereby created a nc%.� Chapter 12.17 of the Edmonds City Code entitled "Suiface V1ater Drainage .Plans. " ' Section 2. .'12.17.010. Purposes. The City Council finds that this Chapter is necessary in order to minimize -1- o water quality degradation by ,-reventing the sedimentation of the creeks, streams, ponds, 1•:,kes and other water bodies; to protect property owners adjacent to developing land from increased runoff rates which could cause erosion ofabutting property; to promote sound development policies.which re- spect and preserve the City's water courses; to insure the safety of City roads and rights of way; and to decrease surface water damage to public and private property. Section' 3.'! 12.1.7.020. Definitions. (1)' "Comprehensive drainage plan" refers to a detailed analysis for each drainage basin which compares the capabilities and needs for runoff'accomodation due to various combinations of development, land use, structural and nonstructural management alternatives. The plan recornmends the form, location and extent of quantity and quality con- trol measures which will meet legal requirements, water quality standards, and community standards, as well as identifying institutional and funding requirements for plan implementation." (2) "Computations" shall mean calculations, includ- ing coefficients and other pertinent data, made to dC.:ternline the drainage plan with rates of flow of watcr'given in cubic feet per sec - and (cfs). (3) ."Design Storm" shall mean that rainfall event selected by the DPW for the purposes of design, ray specifying butte the return period in years and the -2- durationn hours. (4) "Develonmcntal coverac:e" shall mean all developed surface areas witiiin the subject property including, but notjlimited'to, rooftops, driveways, carports, :accessory buildings, parking areas, and other impervious surfaces. (5) "Director of Public c•jorks (DPW) " is the DPW or his designee. (6) "Drainage area" shall mean the watershed (acreage) j contributing surface outer runoff to.and including the. subject. property. (7) "Drainage yuidcl.ine manual" shall mean the manual of technical and administrative procedures established by the Public works Department 1,,Ihich specifies methods to be used, the level of detail of analysis required, and other details for implerientation of the. provisions of this Chapter. (8) "Drainage plan" shall mean a plan for receiving, handling, and transporting surface water within the subject property. (9) Drainage treat[ncnt/al_,atcment facili.tic," shall mean any facilities installed or constructed in conDunction with a drainage plan for the purpose of treatment or abatement of urban runoff, ,excluding retention or detention facilities. (10) ".Open Channel" shall mean a ditch, Swale or stream section Which will provide capacity for the maximum design storm flow. The top of the -3- bank of a open charn;Icl will be one foot abov- e the maximum flow line for the designed storm. (11) "Peak dischargc" shall mean the maximum sur- face water runoff rate (cfs) determined for the design :storm frequency prior to the development. (12) Receivinc; bodies of water" shall mean creeks. streams, lakes and other bodies of water into which surface waters are directed, either na- turally, oi'in man-made ditches or open systems. (13) "Retentlion/detention facilities" shall mean fa- cilities designed either to hold runoff for short period of time and then releasing it to the natural,,watercourse or to hold water for a consid- erable length of time and then consuming it by evaporation, plants, or infiltration into the ground ' (14) "Subject [DrOTDerty" shall mean the tract of land which is the subject of the permit and/or approval action. Section 4.. ;12.17.030. Submission of a Drainace Plan. (1) All persons applying for any of the following .permits acid/or approvals shall submit for approval a drainage plan with their application and/or request; (a) Grading Permit (b)1 Substantial development permit required under RCS 90. S8 (Shoreline t•fanagcr,ient Act) -4- i (co -subdivision approval ' (d) Short subd.i iision approval (e) Rezones (f) Conditional use permits effecting a drainage change (g) Building permits where the permit re- lates to 5,000 or more square feet of developmental coverage within the property .(h). Planned Residential'Development. Commencement' of: construction work under any of the above permits or applications shall not begin until final approval of the drainage plan is obtained in accordance with Section 12.17.070 of the Edmonds City Code. (2) The same plan submitted during one permit/approval process may be subsequently submitted ,pith further required applications. The plan shall be supple- mented wiih such additional information that is requested by the DPW or required by the provisions of the Drainage Guideline Manual. (3). The plan requirement established in this section will not apply when the DPW de.L•ermines that the proposed permit and/or acti.vi.Ly: (a) Will. noL Seriously and adversely impact ttie water yualiLy condlLions of any affected.' receiving bodies of water, and (b) Will not alter the drainage patterns, in- crease the peak discharge or surface or -5- f subsurface or .cal":,e any other adverse effects in; the drainage Y Section 5. 12.17.0,10. Contents of a Drainace Plan. All persons applying for any of the permits and/or approvals containcd.:in Section 12.17.030 of the Edmonds City Code shall provide a drainage plan for surface and pertinent subsurface water Elows entering, flowing within,'and.leaving the subject property. The detailed form and.contents of the drainage plan shall.be described in procedures established by the'DPWj n theiDrainage Guideline Manual. The procedures will,set-forth the manner of presenting the following re- quired information: (1) Background computations for sizing drainage .a- cilities: _ (a) Depiction of the drainage area on a t000- graphical map, with acreage indicated. (b) Indication of the peak discharge and amount of surface water currently entering and leav- ing the subject property. (c) Indication Of the peak discharge and amount of runoff,v,,hich will be generated within the subject property if developn;ent is allowed'to proceed. (d) Detbrminatloll Of the peclk disc}large and amount of water that will be generated by ten (10) year storm frequencies at various points on the subject property. (2) Proposed improvements for handling the computed -6- runoff.' (3) At the time of approv,i t of the drainage plan for the subject property, a schedule for inspection of construction and facilities will be established by _the Director of Public Works. Section 6. 12-17.050. Mandatory Requirements for Drainage*Imorovements. (1) (a) Surface water entering the subject property shall be received at the naturally occuring location and surface water exiting the sub- ject property shall be discharged at the natural location with adequate energy dissi- pators within the subject property -to -mini - Mize downstream damage and with no diversion stream at any of these points; and (b) The peak discharge from the subject Dre:Derty may not be increased due to the proposed development; and (c) Retention/detention faci.liti'es must be pro- vided in order to handle all surface water in excess of the peak discharge that was present prior to the development. (d) ' Where open channel cons:truct.ion is used to handle drainage within the tract, a, minimum of fifteen (15) feet shall be provided be- tween the structures and the top of the bank of the defined channel. (i) In open channel work: the water surface -7- �levation :.11a11 be indi�d on the plan and profile:: drawings. The configuration of the fini:;hed grades constituting the banks of the open channel will also be shown on the drawings. Proposed cross section of the channel shall be shown with stable side slopes as approved by the DPW. (iii) The maximum water surface elevation of the design flow shall be indicated on the cross section. (e) V.1hen a closed system is used to handle drain - ago within the tract, all structures shall be, a minimum of ten feel: from the closed system.. (2) Deviations from any or all of the foregoing require- ments may be permitted only after a determination by the DPW using the Comprchensivc Drainage Plan and employing the following criteria: (a) Capacity of do%-,nstream facilities; (b) Accept -ability of receiving bodies of water; (c) Possibility of adverse effects of retention;' (d) Utility,of regional retention facilities; and capability of maintenance of t;le s'stem. Section 7. 12.1.7.000. 1)c_vc 1.0}>r.1c11L in C it:ical ['looc't Drainage and/or Erosion Areas. Developiiient ':;hick would in- crease the volume of discharge from the subject property shall not be permitted in areas where existing flooding, drainage and/or erosion conditions present an imminent n / i likelihood of harm to the wel:'ire and ;afcty of the sur- rounding conununity, until sucl time as the community hazard is alleviated. Section 8.1 12.17.070. Review and �lr:)proval of the Plan --Appeal. All storm drainage plans prepared in connec- tion with any of the permits and/or approvals listed in Sec- tion 12.17.030 of the.Edmonds City Code shall'be submitted for review by and approval of the DPW. Appeals from the approval or denial by the DPW shall be. made in writing to the City Council within ten (10) days from the date of the DhW.'s decision. the City Council in deciding the appeal, shall follow the criteria as set fortis in this Chapter, the Comprehensive Drainage Plan and the Drainage Guideline Manual. Provided, ho,�;ever, that stanc- ards relating to mctl-lods of construction or Materials aco:)ted by the City or established by the D1?.'•1 shall not be varied, modified or waived by the City Council. Any. appeal from the decision of the City Council• shall be made within ten (10) days of the City Council's decision to the Snolhomish' County Superior Court. Section 9. 12.1.7.080. lsta'.�].i,i1mc nt Or 1?cqional Facilities. If modifications of the, Drainage Plan for the subject property i•:otil.,3 better implciilellt the provisions of the Comprehensive Drainage Plan, the Director 'of Public Works may recommend to the City Council that the City should assume responsibility for the f.urt}ler. design, construction, and maintenance of drainage facilities o;l the Subject property. In the event the;City assumes responsibility for design, -9- •�. �O�IStrUCt1O11, Gild �11tCI1i1nce C,` the fLlClll , the de- veloper shall be required to p,.•.- the portion of the design i and construction costs of the if.icilitics which would be required for and are attributable to, the subject property.. Section 10. 12.17.090. Bonds, Release and Indemnifi- cation Required. The DMI is authorized to require all persons constructing retentlon/detclltlon facilities to post performance, main'tcnance and cash bonds. (1) Performance Bond. Prior to commencing construe- tion, the person constructing the facility shall post a performance bond or other suitable security guaranteeing construction will occur in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of conforming said construction .,,iLh the approved drainage plans and. in a form approved by the City. The amount of the bond shall be increased atone -year intervals in a proportion equal to the prevailing rate of inflation in construction costs. After determina- tion by the, DPW, that all faci..li.ties are constructed incompliance witti the approved plans and upon ance bond as hereinafter provic:ed, providing mainten the performance bond shall be released. (2) 1.13intenjlnce 11onci. After ,,Z.Iti.sfactory completion of the facilities, the person constructing the facility shall maiintain the facility for a period of two years. A maintenance bond, or other suitable security, shall be maintained throughout the t•..o- year period. The bond amount shall be set by the -10- DPW in an amount su,licient to cover the costs of correcting all deficiencies in construction, r i design, workmanship or maintaining and operating the facility. (3) . The owner of the subject property shall execute a_ release and a 'covenant running with the land binding on himself, his heirs, assigns and'succes sors in interest, as well as all future owners of the property to indemnify, defend and hold,,.the City harmless 'from 'any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, or injunctive relief occasioned by the construction, operation or maintenance of the drainage facilities. This covenant Shall be recorded at ceiner's e::pense. Section 11. 12 . 17 . 1.00. City P,ssu�. �? ic:z of Ma intent . At its option, the City shall assume the maintenance of retention/detention facilities on.private property if the retention/detention facilities are juda_cd by the DPI; to be F for public benefit. tkny decision by the DN-.1 to forego assumption of the maintenance of retention/detention fa- cilities shall be made prior to approval of the drainage plan. If the City decides not to assur,,c the maintenance of the retention/detention facilities, the dcvel.oper shall make arrangements for assumption of maintenance in a manner approved by the DPW. Such arrangements shall be completed. and approved prior to the end of the -two-year period of developer responsibility. -11- JA Should the; City assume m: .intenance, the,- follo,.-ling con- ditions shall be met: } (1) All of the requirements of Section 12.17.090 of the Edmonds City .Code have been fully complied with; (2), The facilities have been inspected and approved by the DPW after two(2) years of operation; (3) All necessary easements entitling the City to properly maintain the facility have been conveyed i to the City and recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor at the owner's expense. 'Section 1Z. 12.17.110. A pl.icability to Governmental Entities. All municipal corporations and govcrnrnental entities shall be required to submit a drainage plan and comply with the terms of this Chapt'cr when developing and/or improving land including, but not limited to, road building, and wideniny, within the areas of the City. 0 Section 13. 12.17.120. Effcctive D te. The require- ments of.this chapter shall apply to all plats receiving final and preliminary approval subsequent to the effective date of this Chapter. In the .case of all additional ac- tions enumerat-e,d in Section 12.17.030 of the L'dr,)onds C.ity Code, the terms of this chapter shall apply where final action by the City has not been to}:en prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. i Section 14. 12.17,.130. I.stabl..ishment of Drainacae Guideline Mjanual. The DI't•; is hereby authorized and directed to conduct studies, assemble data, establish rules, rccju- lations and procedures, and take all other steps necessary' -12- ' to prepare the D6nayu Guide 11.ne Manual. i Section 15. 12.1.7.300. Sev(_r_ibilily. If any sec- tion, subsection, clause, phr•:i:.,e, or word of this Ordinance or any provision adopted.by reference herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. APPROVED: /s/ H. H. Harrison 11t1Y0I2, H. H. IiARRISO:,: ATTEST: /s/ Irene Virnev 11oran CITY CLER',, Ii,E,," E' ` .,%i%,NE'L i,110 AN FILED WITii THE CI'I'''i CI,::f?i:. Jude 2•:, 1977 PASSED BY THE CITY c C.)�::CLL. June 23, 1977 PUBLISHED: . Jul; 6, 197/'7 jl! �S"'l.l.. ���d��.'�{d.,�n4�t.. I ��,�x �1_ 1.. .:�<? _,...".�.:'....� �r --—..............•___._.........�..t....i.....,_... ._.1 ._... ,•... .�.�..._.._•., l Y /�.�.��tk•, w�i ����"V r���x.`J�, '"a i^C .�.p�`rot g^.» RECEIVED E Dir. 01 Public NJorks ��° FILE STR1 1 &�. �rORDINANCE "NCI_ :I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, t AMENDING THE BUILDING CODE FOR SAID CITY BY THE. ADOPTION OF!THE 1973 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, (EXCLUDING CHAPTER 51 OF THE APPENDIX) AND THAT CERTAIN VOLUME ENTITLED "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS,";1973 EDITION, AND ELIMINATING PLAN CHECK FEES FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEES FOR FENCES, HOUSING COMPLIANCE INSPEC- TIONS AND RELOCATION OF BUILDINGS; REQUIRING PROVISION FOR DRAINAGE AND GRADING BY AMENDING CHAPTER 11.02 OF THE EDMONDS CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Code, Section 11.02.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11.02.010 Uniform Building Code Ado ted'b Reference. 'k That certain printed code, three copies of which are an ave been on file in the office of the city clerk, for the use and examination of the public, being marked, printed and designated as the Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition, (specifically including all appendices except the appendix to chapter no. 51) and that volume entitled Uniform Building Code Standards, 1973 Edition, all copyrighted 1973 by the International Conference of Building Officials, is hereby adopted by reference and incorporated herein as if fully set forth within this chapter, as the Building Code of the City of Edmonds, subject to the modifications and amendments hereinafter set forth and the code, as adopted, shall regulate the erection, construction, enlarge- ment, alteration, repair, moving, removal, conversion, demolition occupancy, equipment, use, height, area and maintenance of buildings or structures in the city; and further provides for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor providing penalties for the violation of such code; and each and all of the regulations,provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of the Uniform Building Code herein mentioned and as amended and on file in the office of the city clerk is hereby established, pursuant to the Laws of the State of Washington as the Building Code in and for said city. Section 2. Section 11.02.025 (d) Expiration: is hereby amended to read ;as follows: "11.02.025 (d) Expiration. Every permit issued by the building,.official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void, if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 120 days from the date of such permit, or if the building dr work authorized by such permit'is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of one hundred twenty days: Before { such work'can be recommenced a new permit shall be first obtained so to do, and the fee therefor shall be one-half the amount .n7F.•� _ .- __. _.. ..... _...�>: ._'..L:1x.Ls:u !,l.::t,�cc'�'�: _� "�i'st_..L'Cl�_:'�; F — " ' -r.._ _�-• n=_ sr...r:�.�+.tim;.�a�tN`u:rmu�tit:Yli�.-r�iri'abansnni¢§sl"A�'� - , i required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and. specifications for such work; and 'provided, further, that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. Section 3. 'There is hereby added to Chapter 11.02, a new section 11.02.030 to read as follows: ' 11.02.030 Drainage and Grading Requirements for Building Lots and Subdivisions: (a) Gutters, drain lines and inlets or other necessary drainage structures shall be installed where storm water dis- posal cannot be obtained without their use or where erosion cannot be prevented by finished grading and planting. Drywells shall be installed only in areas having open, well drained porous soils. Design, construction and installation of drainage - structures shall be in accordance with standard engineering practice and suitable for the use and maintenance contemplated. (b) Building or owner shall provide grading to insure: (1) Diversion of water away from buildings; (2) Prevention of standing water and soil saturation detrimental to structures and lot use; (3) Provision for disposal of water from lot; (4) Protection of adjoining property. Section 4. Section 11.02.060 of the Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "11.02.060 Repealer Provision. That any and all ordinances in conflict with Chapter 11.02 of the Edmonds City Code are hereby repealed,. provided, however, whenever provisions of this chapter and the Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition, adopted herein, conflict with the provisions of the Edmonds Zoning Code contained in Title 12 of the Edmonds City Code, the provisions of the Zoning Code shall control." Section 5. Section,,11.02.060 of the Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: ,."11.02.061: Guardrails --Section 1716 'of Uniform Building 'Code. Section .716 of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by reference in this chapter is amended and set forth as follows: All unenclosed floor and roof openings; open and glazed sides of landings and stairs; balconies or porches which are more than 30:inches'above grade; and roofs used for other than service of the building shall be protected by a guardrail. Guardrails shali.be'not less than 42 inches in height, provided however,!:guardrails not over 10 feet above the adjacent:finished grade may be 36�inches high. Open guardrails and stair railings -2- {f S 1 t 1 Y f 1,d'+ M q I CK• Ya tw F '��;{y �' �1. ✓N.�iL•Sr .,,;}.�i.r�'Y� L.... ..r.i..ru......\.yy! ski'. ... .,1,....r..t4wC.D.a..L.Lti,.Ya..1.V.L...�...a.1..:. ,,,—•.., -- - - �-r-c-^- .�... : ,,- .._. • p.?_t�.n,';...._y.,...:.,;,,� .,..tt �.:.., , . . vaicmrarun ' _ .. ""' - - . 1 shall have intermediate rails or an ornamental pattern such that no object nine (9) inches in diameter can pass through. Stair railings shall be not less than 30 inches above the nosing of the treads." Section 6. A new section 11.02.066 is hereby added to the Edmonds City Code to read as follows: "11.02.066 Fees --Elimination of Plan Check Fees for'Sinale Family Residences --Establishment of Fence Permit, Housinq Compliance Inspection and Moving Permit Fees. Sectioni303(b) of the Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition, adopted by Section 1 of this ordinance is hereby amended to eliminate plan check fees for Group I and J occupancies. There is hereby established the following fees for the permits as set forth: Fence Permit $ 2.00 Housing Compliance Inspection $25.00 Relocation of Building (moving permit) $10.00 APPROVED: MAYOR o ATTEST: CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: June 4, 3.9`74 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: May 31, 1974 PUBLISHED: June 112, 1974 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: STRE-ET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ON LITIGATION Mayor and Members of the City Council Office of the City Attorney City of Edmonds v. Han Park August 3, 1981 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Report on Litigation August 3, 1981 Page 2 YLs� Wayne . Tanaka Offic f the City Attorney WDT/ka 0 RECOVED STREE, Ai G _ 19 u81 August 1, 1981 Dir.arks Mr. Jack Mitchell, Acting Director Public Works Department City of Edmonds, City Hall Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Mitchell This is to request a comprehensive written instruction for the revisions of an application for the grading permit (800314) and relocation permit (M-4-80). As you may be aware that the revised application for the permits has been ordered by the Superior Court of Snohomish County on July27, 1981 by Judge Daniel Kershner. The previously submitted plans including the drawings of July 16, 1981, preliminary plan two, and reclamation plan have all been examined during the course of the hearing and trial and all have been accept- ed as valid documents. The presiding judges include Judge Bibb, Judge Britt, and Judge Kershner of the Superior Courts. It is imperative that we receive a complete (or comprehensive) written in- struction by all the offices involved in this matter. The instructions should. be accompanied with the appropriate city code or regulations as a supporting document. Our intention is to follow the instructions to the letter in order to avoid any future misunderstandings. Since the original permits were based on the application prior to the recent changes of the city code, we trust that the instructions be based on the customary practices of that time. We also request that you permit us to examine and copy the files so that we could follow the previous examples which has been applied and permitted in the city. We are also in need of a revision of a relocation permit for the rental home on the site and would appreciate the instructions for the relocation of the building and the utilities for the property. It would be appreciated if this request be processed expeditiously without any delay so that the project be resumed immediately. S incere],y yours r Ha° ark =18�4.Olympic- View- Drive-- - Edmonds , WA 98020 copy to: Mary Fung Koehler, Attorney • • . 40 • 0 STREE-l" FILE ¢I UN FOR DMIACM MMCE RECEIVED 0.1 U L 211981 Edmonds City Clerk Claim MUST be presented to the City Council and filed with the City Clerk within 120 days from the date of Accident or Accrual of Daaages. TO THE CIT7 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF @4ONDS: PIE"E. TAKE NOTICE, TEAT HAN Z . PARK if married, give husband'& name or 10k'RESMESAT 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds WA State present actual address by street, number and city AND WHO FOR SIX RtONTHS PRIOR TO DATE OF ACCIDENT RAS RESIDED AT Sarre as AbOVe Give residence by street, =umber and city CLAULS DAtAus Or An PROP. THE CITY OF =mohms IN Tim SUH OF 3 3 2 , 0 0 2 . 5 0 + arising out of the following circumstances: Describe Claim, giving (see attachment) DATE and TIY.E it jury or damage occurred, PLACE and fall particuls.rs. Accurately locate azd describe defects caus- ing in tm7 or de.aage and all acts of nagli- gence claimed. accurately describe injuries or damage (see attachment) State items of damage claimed. Itemise all (see attachment) eapease& and losses. (Claim must be sera to by claimant) isnature o t /f a%Mgaw Ta C before •n Lain 2lst day of July ,1981 Lary Public iz and for the tote of faaAington, residing at S e at t le ' A L. w STREET FILLO CITY ®PJS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 14, 1981 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Wayne Tanaka City Attorney 1411-4th Ave Building Seattle, Washington 98101 SUBJECT: EIH!A�NPARIK-183140LYMPIC VIEW DRIVE , �1 Dear Wayne: Enclosed for your information are copies of Street Division Daily Vehicle Work Reports relative'to work by the Street Crew due to Han Park's development. Sincerely, ANDIN Street Superintendent AB/gs Attachments Note: Three Water/Sewer Reports also submitted to the City Attorney with above information. C I T Y o f E O 11. P 1! P L I C W O R K S D E PAR T F t E N T x WATER/SEDER DEPART!?E;JT -- DAILY VEHICLE 'JORK REPORT }; 'REPORT OF UNIT NUMBER: DATE : ... WEATHER: ° JOB ADDRESS 4 1^. TIVE IN D o OUT } TRUCK USED MILEAGE EMPLOYEES NAPE WORK ORDER NUMBER JOB ORDER NUMBER ® y �j11� �'AS 7Z nn i � -. it ' �. • �� �, � t w � l E UI3VENT USED Ile III IAL USED DESCRIPTION OF o y WORK AND "REMARKS -�r>J 7--A L 1� -------------- 8/16/72 i 71 aw- •PEPORT OF UNIT NUMB . ER: JOB ADDRESS TI N TIME OUT TRUCK USED C I T . --Y o f E D 11 0 11 D S P 1! (;L I C '--1 0 R K S DE P A R T E N T IWATER/SEIIER DEPARTt!E;JT -- DAILY VEHICLE 140,RK REPORT 17 DATE: EAS WEATHER: 5 VA) V MILEAGE EMPLOYEES NAME M A A 7-zAJ i4nRK ORDER NUMBER r)^fe) A) JOB ORDER NUMBER .,;Pop— F/I/- EQUIPVENT USED 451 MATOTAL USED -m . .41 DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND REMARKS 6A n 0 P EIV 7' A r 7,q J,G AVP I -J ri � J-1jil 8/16/72 C I T Y o f E D! 1 n N D S --- P 1! D L I C ! f l R K S D E P A R T t 1 E N T j I WATER/SEDER DEPARTI?ENT -- DAILY VEHICLE !4ORY, REPORT REPORT OF UNIT NUMBER: 1 3 DATE: WEATHER- sib JOQ ADDRESS '17 j ^ 4 - 7 -j--r,,PL TILL,IN TI . OUT �L ) TRUCK USED 4n - 1 I�+I LEARE �,_ �C� EMPLOYEES NAME l ReGCWRI 14ORK ORDER NUMBER lf% JOB ORDER NUMBER E, Nqi LE E UIP�'ENT USED r (^,\,1 ti AL USED DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND REMARKS �� FILL 1/4 G a1�� 8/16/72 • • 0 J 0 STREET FILE ATTACHMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES HAN Z. PARK Summary: Sand taken by City of Edmonds from excavation site (18314 Olympic View Drive)" and stockpiles (Lot 8 & 9, Block 2, Admiralty Acres, Edmonds). The figures below are minimum quantities; the maximum amounts will be proven at trial. Date from 09/03/80 to 06/16/81 Unit Item Quantity Price Price *Fill sand 2674.5 c.y. $5.00 c.y. $13,372.50 (cubic yards) *Screened sand 1620 c.y. TOTALS 4294.5 c.y. $11.50 c.y. $18,630.00 $32,002.50 *These quantities reflect the figure know or informed to claimant as of 0 7/15/81. Includes: 09/03/80 09/04/80 09/04 - 09/19/80 Latter part/1980 02/81 - 06/16/81 Fill sand Fill sand Fill sand. Fill sand Screened sand 830 c.y. $4150.00 840 c.y. $4200.00 1000 c.y. $5000.00 4.5 c.y. $22.50 1620 c.y. $181630.00 CHECKLIST 1. The driver is responsible for checking the following items daily: Tires Visible Wheel Nuts Windshield Wipers Mud Flaps . Oil Level Radiator Coolant Litter Container Battery. Lights I{orn Brakes Safety Equipment Dash Gauges 2. If any item is unsatis- factory, fill out a REQUEST FOR VEHICLE REPAIR form. 3. Report anynew body damage to immediate supervisor. (8/79)� C I T Y O F E D M 0 N D S - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - DAILY VEHICLE WORK RIrPORT REPORT OF UNIT NUMBER: 13 DATE: Lp —I(D— 8Y WEATHER: �d I IL JOB ADDRESS �� C—D �"� _�- /`'�'4/vim- ✓ TIME IN D (7) TIME OUT D U ✓ v TRUCK USED MILEAGE EMPLOYEES NAME WORK ORDER NUMBER JOB ORDER NO. EQUIPMENT USED B U ; MATERIAL USED W1�-z, DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND REMARKSf�747 �is'i ; ! `L p/li 7.4 0,%y a'Z-4 �aytdrev g m.o •� .a�,d 7—/� eA-e -r- it i�� e7 v m/ ..z_c 71i 2" C 42 7 . C-- s . c, w eit., 7A i r C 2 r C 2 - . -- _ _ ... _� _- �' �_. ---' s------- • -- � �-� ter'- f F—✓�%�c. `' _ .. �—da.�,>'— -'...,` -- '-- ----- --' -- { i� V!:HlC, c c C,' A P Ci n C)-' U::: n A z c c L c . .......... Z6 u c L Z C) --------- Fr 0 c i —F. ;lA 1 i.•f V;.1t1 C� F l:[1�J; k FO%.— ... . C:".7 n y ..i1• i i.�R zvJ M PI 1 - h c c u C PC r* 011 L c v c r— Co Licccroco,,co, I :- .1 C c: C --)- L' . Eh c Z: ' c'o c r I A Y P n;� OF Ut--IT 7 -------------------- -r4 -r4 r Kelp FROM: DATE: RE: CITY ®F D ONDS HARVE H. HARRISONR E�„o 17 F1s.,D MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (205) 775.2525 STREET FILE -14 MEMORANDUM Mayor Members of the City Council Office of the City Attorney April 10, 1981 City of Edmonds vs. Han Z. Park -- Report on Litigation • 0 Memo to Edmonds April 10, 1981 Page Two al OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Wayne . Tanaka 'T FILE April 9, 1981 MEMO TO: All Hands Public Works Department FROM: Jim Adams City Engineer SUBJECT: EXCAVATION AT 1831_4 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE The City has just'obtained a restraining order prohibiting any additional removal of material from the subject property. The owner is permitted to reshape the existing cuts, to clear a path to move the house above the excavation, and to move the house, Please report any removal of material to me, Bob Franklin or Wayne Tanaka (622-2991). Please write down the time, circumstances, license numbers, and general description of work and equipment. RRF : j ky .4q ? March 24, 1981 Mr. Harold Reeves Building Department City of Edmonds Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Dear Mr. Reeves: 0 ht9R 2 6 RECD to Re: Delayed permit for lot 9, 10, & lo6 STREEY FILE This is to confirm our conversation of March 12, 1981. We have agreed -permit for filling is overdue and regJite immediate attention. As you have acknowledged the topography of site has been modified extensively by the activities of Public Works Department of City of Edmonds. Thus did topographic map or aerial is no longer valid. If the city official continue to insist on submitting newly surveyed topographic map in place of the one I have submitted last august, the expnese can not be justified. I also question the motivation of the request because the ground will be filled to existing street level. The plan for the artificial pond has been withdrawn last august, and current plan is to place 48 inch galvanized culvert connecting existing culvert. I sincerely hope the plan of august 1981 is acceptable to you or we'll be happy to use the topog. map you were going obtain from Engineering Dept. City of Edmonds. I appreciate your urging of extending excavation permit for lot 9, 10 to lot lob. As you may be aware, the subdivision plan and contour modification has been in the city office since 1977. I intend apply for the work permit upon approval of the plan. Since the approval of the plan has been delayed, I am requesting, under separate cover, Director of Public Works, to process the application immediately. Sincerely yours, r ✓. 1 H r 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds. Copy: Mr. F. Herzberg, Director of Public Works Attorney C-1 C 4`C::I. _> T c; chcC'r.i �� Chc':e1 io. ;n- e C:' 1 r A : V -�� 0:? i_cac2 ra Cco'_ nz LScCc1- Conzzinc: L.:L Cam' _ le i IC '"'0P S n!:PA. RT.l.T,:,:7 -- .)A i i. `!I_}r� C L F li:'-rC;; — (, t F',::.POW. of Ut I- n t _L-A;}!Ep: SUN L-�(�l//LI r_ ^r IDS .. �- --- � n'► r <', i �1 K. �Qe EMERGENCY REPORT 17 C I T Y O F F D H 0 D STD CHECKLIST - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTYFI:T - i. The driver is responsible DAILY VFHICLF WORK REPOR7 for checking the following �� items det"lv; REPORT OF UNIT NUMsr_k: S- DATE: 1 HEATHER: Tires ? `! Visible llheei ?tuts / { uind3hield Wipers Mud r laps 1 Oil Level .. Radiator Coolant Litter Concainer _ Battery LiEh is Horn Brakes Safety Equipment Das:, Gauges 2_ If ary item is unsatis- faccory, fill out a REQUEST FOR VZHICLE REPAIR for-. JOB ADDRESS TIME IN I 7j D / 3 oo TI1 E OUT I 3.0• IrRUCK USED ! - MILEAGE r E`iPLOYEES 2.1.?`.E I 3. =epor_ any ne-- body da =Ee ^'ORK ^vRDEP :�T`<3ER tc i—ediate superviso-. .a JO.5 oR DER NO. 1 F„U, E! U S ED /co fJ :� a`"TERIAL US[.D - D:.SCRiP1l0;I OF **OM ADD nE �AfL°:S ------------ c c;: i. i . -.r•r..�iC _l:.ii.Y ... :er Gi Chcci:in- .hc .' i CarF. 1.'paJ: --� Qj c.:7s (:e � v` o! lo�.n� �._i'0r•:"i ti:':i,^.tJ3. �' '� l i f Ab P, Evc i - +1 TzTF' SERE ST FILE C I T Y o f E n i o- t i D s --- P 1! P, L —1 C-- '.-! 0 R K S D E P A R T H, E N T WATER/SEDER DEPARTITLNT DAILY VEHICLE 140RK REPORT 'REPORT OF UNIT NUMBER: /8 DATE: 3/) E lklEATHER: JOB ADDRESS �7�-,AU'7, 51 TRUCK USED 1-11 LEAr.E EMPLOYEES tWIE WnRK ORDER NUMBER I JOB ORDER NUIMI.IER EQUIPMENT USED F!AT USED DESCRIPTION OF dOPK AND REMARKS co 5? Aj Ac In A 4 8/16/72 F C I T Y o f E D! n I! D S --- P t! C L I C ! 0 R K S D E P AR T M E N T r !dATER/ SEIIER DEPARTI'.E;IT -- DAILY VEHICLE !tiIORY. REPORT - II'R.EPORT OF UNIT NUMBER: DATE: WEATHER- JOQ ADDRESS -- -- — -- — ---- _ TIIN' TRUCK USED I'I LEArE � '= : EMPLOYEES NAh!E wnRK. ORDER NUMBER ,JOB ORDER NUMBER 'E UIPrIENT USED ` ItA Us DESCRIPTION OFCi — — - - a y{v —'---- 1WORK AND REMARKS Z4 \!�1�� -1 F'� ��E? yl � - 8/16/72 C I T Y --- _ _ c f EDltrlilDS__-- PI!CL I C :Ir RY.S —� - D E P A P. T rt E ri 7 I 'WATER/SEDER DEPARTt'ENT -- DAILY VEHICLE !dCP.K REPORT i -r 'REPORT OF UNIT NUMREP.: ®� DATE : / v. JOB ADDRESS L-►'i P; S �-- 'J.'EATHER: Try E IN no UT I TRU . USED '> ' 7 � 1i1 �!LD ►-'.ILEArE I EMPLOYEES NAME 14C1RK OP.CER NUMBER JOB ORDER NUMBER � �. � • ._. I-"�,`, � ria,� -:�, E U I PM ri USED E T 1't l USED DES TION OF ' LA WORK AND REMARKS � � �- 1 t _ / ! 8/ 16/ 72 STREET FILE �.;'^,�SFil+i:�l� �;`.1y_'..i'1y^M' �"vv V✓v� /lJ`� /��/ l Ir ,.;», 'a: ,., 'l.�. Zk" .... _:..:�='9�`S�. m'f "+'�." 4:+iGi�F bt. tnt e"i, 7a.: a`n7.-k'��.�..v� sa �.i'ki':k':I��k+ ��n`` s... .,.. ., ,.�.. �:...i. ,c +. ... �. �.:... �+.. .. may.. = ,. ,.. .T.."�. �.. S :..:�. .:,�• ... c. . �� ,� �, ate- �� �A�� �� � �z d %fie-�xMt e—�z G /,� ��c�.�z. �,,f0 H.�, u,,l� ��u(f rl�v, „�C <sJ � _ , — - :� a �..t, . /Ic„e. �j�je. � 1'�r:,�c /Zir- �rr+nt- ow �,Ui�.��' f ai�vruc 7iwe � {�w✓-. ��,�.. � � f ;�ti�, �Qy�yf� �i� , �/. etil�<< /�r�/� � � �� .�� a , n"` :.a "•.x�Y ""r :.:. i.rw-iwur,W4: ,+ aa. ,t..,� t _ vjt p�vrw /6rrer�'-ra� ,w- ale c��' c c nt c 1 nz I eA 1 y c c 1-1 Apz L c v c r Con :-z c f; C C c s 7C' r • VEXIC!-E L '0 7J. RZ 1: p 0 7 Z-c jC3 DES,-- C.,; I I L R jeo J PPPST IMPORTANT! Press Firmly While Writing plicalion! ALE Fill Building Relocation Permit Insideplicant Heavy Lines OWNER'S NAME t:) Nl 7 , r« MAILING ADDRESS j 931 i4- O LAM P i c:. I �w. �/k - CITY & ZONE, .. - TEL. NO. MOVING CONTRACTOR COAjS'r/Z JL��O�IJ /< d 1 3320 L V4J w0 00) 1 7 SF 3 - 1� 2-2--a CONTRACTOR'S _. STATE CITY BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LICENSE NO. SITE DESCRIPTION SIFc a -- '-T? "' i'Ll , £P.tiiv,yZ).S -gal Description of Present Bldg. Site — (Show below or attach four copies L.oT 1 C , 6Le, Gk v1I. is , P. 4 e a�- _Wo. c00-J-1 DDRE:SS OF NEW BUILDING SITE +gal Description of New Bldg. Site — (Show below or attach four copies) S,6Rvkbiv. 0qDJ0%v/AJ_6 v,4C,19 , I- ND To PfSOvE r Power Company ............P.".n... .................. /.-� ')�'.-.l.-... Telephone Company Le .............lc....(...G......,...............-.......................... 1tJrVE.P of= %�= Si I.- 3iy C //t./ I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, a duly licensed moving contractor, or the authorized agent of one of these. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating building relocation; and in doing this work, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code, State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Signature of Owner, /� Contractor, or `ky, / // Authorized Agent ... .......-•---,(- .....�.. J..'t�i.:.l.�:. Signer's��� ]Phone ��,%' Address ..I::..I ....�/.�.: di ..r...C....t:L...,.No. .... .. ............. ......y city........gem !vWv-------------•--.......................................---------...... Date................. j/................---...........---.................................. PERMIT NUMBER t; E7DMONDS PRE -MOVE 9Z INSPECTION PERMIT NO. FIRM; BLDG. PERMIT NO. 1 2 3 FOR WORK ZONE AT .NEW SITE MOVE CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE COVERAGE NAME OF SURETY PROVIDING Y.L. & P.D. COVERAGE STREET ADDRESS CITY, ZONE & STATE. VALID INSURANCE POLICY CHECKED BY: BUILDING DESCRIPTION DESCRIBE: BASIC CONSTRUCTION & PRESENT USE OF BUILDING: OVERALL LENGTH OF BUILDING: FT. HEIGHT AS LOADED WIllTH AS LOADED BLDG. AREA A C b"r. �FJ FT. SQ. FT. POLICE DEPT. APPROVAL OF MOVING ROUTE DATE W By: v Timc to Commence Moving: W Time to Finish Moving: .................................................................... ENGINEERING CLEARANCE / A" RELOCATION PERMIT FEE $ DATE W DATE °0 t o. /� C .% f_ ' c W RECEIPT NO. ATTENTION: PERMIT APPROVAL THIS PERMIT THIS PERMIT DOES NOT BECOME AUTHORIZES VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ONLY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DEPU- TY, THE FEES ARE PAID, AND RE- CEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE OF THE SPACE PROVIDED BUILDING NOTED By.................................................................... Director's Signature BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Date................................................................ CITY OF EDMONDS DISTRIBUTION OF COPIES 1•R s-llo, WHITE — File (Bldg. Dept.) YELLOW — Move Inspector GREEN — Assessor GOLDENROD — Police Dept. PINK — Moving Contractor BUILDING DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (QR NAME OF BUSINESS) yEj MAILING ADDRESS ` Z . 1 >r, ;'; ;' �� / (; � ; � �c��•l;' / r- 1. 1:.� . � �`' . CITY ELEPHONE NUMBER i A ME U �^ / W ADDRESS t 2 CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME p ADDRESS f U a E CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER F i ZO U eraTc �rer,�ec n���u oeo r�ry .-rumor u.. oro USE Applicant Fill ZONE ,r _ Inside Heavy Lines�- JOB ADDRESS r . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal Description of Property (Show below or Attach Four Copies P, 1 � T ER UBDIVISION JSHORT SUB NO. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING ?i PROPOSED/--� DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED ❑ UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED ❑ CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER ❑ SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ'D ❑ NO. ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS ❑ & FOOTINGS REQ'D i SEE.ENGINEERING MEMO DATED CHECKED BY METER SIZE I BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE i SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED I PROPOSED COM PLET'EI EXEMPT SHORELINE REMARKS VARIANCE OR CU IPLANNING REVIEW BY IDATE El NEW '��` RESIDENTIAL ❑GAS LINE NON-RESIDENTIALIF] SIGN ADD ❑ ALTER Q DEMOLISH ER R FILL RETAINING WALL ❑ FENCE ( X_FT1I.-LAN SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED El YES ❑ NO PLAN CHECKED BY ❑ REPAIR Q RE -MOVE swim POOL REMARKS Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 0 DWELLING F UNITS d NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE E W 0 m CHECK FEE p PLOT PLAN j:: "-f/-, L I.1, , 't YARDS LOT COVERAGE FRONT SIDE REAR FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE SIGN N "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and � successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless i the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and < agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, a z arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. lssu- RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL AREA I OCCUPANCY I OCCUPA GROUP LOAD THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE. CODED 31.04. VALUATION I FEE of ance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce 2 anv renuirement of anv city ordinance nor limit In any way the MEMO TO FROI-I : ' SUBJECT • 0 Building Division Community Development Department Engineering Division Public Works /Department Ir DATIE • „f - /�� After review of the subject_ building; permit application, we have the following comments: 1. Drivewav slope not to exceed 140. 2. Right-of-way construction permit required for any work on City property. 3. Backwater valve required if: doumstairs P-1kunbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 4. Sewer and water service lines to be scar^ited by 1.0 Feet (10') at point s of exit from building. 5. The Contractor is required to keep the ,butting streets clean of dirt and debris caused by the construction; ij�riiatur PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST w BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW 44oS� w (address) ate 0 Street Right -of -Way Existing_ z Access Easements Existing NONE READ — H x Utility Easement Existir Nv now REQD ' w Lot Per Subdivision Plat .jE�r�n� Assessor Map SEe /p w Site Plan Checked for Accuracy. 2 Underground Wiring Reqd. H 0 Check Accuracy of Legal Description - z Review by Date - -� w Existing Water Main Size •� e (� Water Main Required r Service Line Required Hydrant Size Existing x Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code L Size w Detector Check Meter Reqd. Cross Connection Inspection Fire Department Comments d Water Meter Charge Reqd. Review by Date Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Pe / Sanitary Sewer Availabilityi' Drawing No. it Side Sewer Availability x w Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd. 3 Review by boa-. Date w Open Ditch Existing Reqd. Culvert Reqd. Size c4 Catch Basin Reqd. Indicate an Site Plan O Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff H Manhole reqd. Indicate on Site Plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Review by Date AA Revised: lv10-1977 Page 2 Street Paving Reqd. H Cab and. Gutter Reqd. W Sidewalk Reqd. W Curb Cut for Driveway Regd. r; Right -of -Way Construction Permit Reqd. H Bond Reqd. for Public Inprovements to Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Signing Reqd. Ga.. Pre Permit Site Inspection made on z off BY: SEWER H U w W� WATER . STREET 1-1 44 ENGINEERING Special Requirements listed in memo to Commmity Development Department, Building Division BY Date o All items filled in on Building Permit Application a BY Date a' Drawings Stamped and Notations Made w BY Date Approved by Public Works,Department Revised: lv 10-1977 •0 so TQACT rah, SEA ulEw TIZ,4c7s PLOT L n N Excc-pr T owr 1:)o2Ti v,u "T �• F •� T FIL,� CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 CITY ATTORNEY August 19, 1980 . Gay Riach P. O. Box 10'67 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Re: Han Park Dear Gay: ?'HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR RECLi VED AUG 211980 Dir. of Pub"C Works Mary Lou Block of the Planning Division has asked me to write this letter concerning your client, Han Park, and,his pro- posed developments in Edmonds. As you are aware, Mr. Park has had numerous contacts with various City staff members concerning his development projects in Edmonds. As a result of these dis- cussions, misunderstandings have developed which culminated in the meeting last week with your client and members of the City staff. As a result of the confusion and misunderstanding that exists, the staff feels it best that there be no further oral communication directly with Mr. Park. Any requests for informa- tion should be put into writing by Mr. Park and will be respond- ed to in writing. Of course, the staff would be happy to discus any of Mr. Park's projects verbally with either yourself or with Mr. Park's professional engineers. Please advise your client of the contents of this letter. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Wayne D. Tanaka cc: Mary Lou Block Fred Herzberg Charlie Dibble WDT/al %%g"c-Nc• r (6� Fri y8A,SEMEAv7 4 F110 PL.9.v r' wR(-L .. 4 Co.tic S tm C ;rCao2 Ix rz 7 6 Au• l/, c C""A"c�' Cl a y oi�6 �OX36 �54D.OQ•- Sotso jn,;C-TY61 AFIZ "Oe FNO. PLAN QCAL6 10� f O51TIodJ cry lPoSTS w i u L-O 6 Pc--r.v D POUCE is ,Mov&z . 6 L—Li �Q/ Crff T Sloe L Lc= vA T/ J4 AJ -t I i i MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FILE COPY � ST REE`f FILE February 4, 1981 Building Division James E. Adams City Engineer STATUS OF DRAI14AGE & FILL PERMITS AT`18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE The plan submitted with the Building Permit for a storm drain at the subject address (copy attached) was not approved. The plan submitted did not, in our opinion, reflect a basic understanding of engineering hydraulics or the speci- fic hydraulic situation at the site. One of our requirements" (see copy of memo attached) was to have the outlet sN�stem de- signed by.a registered.Pr_ofessional Engineer. The revised plan submitted by Mr. Park simply elim- inated the outlet control system. It is our requirement that this, or any alternative system, is to be designed by a regis- tered Professional Engineer. We so notified Mr. Park in our letter of October 7, 1980. (Copy attached.) We are requiring a completely engineered plan for the drainage improvements and the related fill prior to is- suance of a permit for the subject work. We recommend all correspondence with Mr. Park be sent certified mail, return receipt requested. J E. ADAMS BF/jf B. Cranklin dt _ ply �� �wf q�q•�1�w� t�YAmc ':( �iGiL016N8' LY 1Li1':X:gt } IJ:ry�l ""°"=''��. TYiWL11W. L) $ L tj er. 1 I T BUILDING DIVISIO Applicant Fill ZON`'i FR PERMIT APPLICATIONInside Heavy Lines ---.Li_\._�- IU rl N A.ME nlll )IrI ;5--.,r„„" ^(OR NAMC OV UVSIn HSS)tui. � "��-•j q. DESCRIPTION UDDIV ISION r SHORT SU D-NOtw+-y'1 W MAILING ADDRESS z --. ')) / / ( ` 1 /'I 1/' i PUBLIC IH7 OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP C17 / �f- II RCi TELEPHONE NUMBER HAMIC"— - 1'17UPUS L'U 1' DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY —_ N W ADDRESS ❑ y F .PUBLIC IMPROvEMEN'rS REQUIRED U DRAINAGE It.1PROVEMENTS REQUIRED CClJ C CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER DRAINAGE Pl_AN HEOUIRED r❑ V t-� UNL7E f1G ROUND 1V 1111 N(: flEOl/1R[C.) ,L NAME CONNECT ION '1❑'O SANITARY S[WFR L C _ SEPTIC TANK P E U M 1 T 17 E O' D NO- 0 ADDRESS --'— 7 I,_PNF.n❑ S ELEVArION OF OPF1-rY CIrNrRS U !t FOO't INGS REO'D T E L L•' P H O N E N U m U t_`t F Z SEE L•'NGINELNINC: MEMO DArEU,_--_y_ U STATE LICENSE NUMDER — -P-- - _._ CITY LICENSE IvVMBC-R '�{, CIIEC KLI) ITV Legal Description of Propdrty (Show cielcw or Attach Four Copied ME'reH slze sul('�IIIJILI�IING, _______.—__—._____ W CI ; CI i SIGN A17F:A ENV. REVICV/ AO NO. C ALLO•Nr_ri 1'170t•OSEO COMPLErr- EXEMPT U V1 Rl W--.—___-_'--_- u S t (O R E L INC D W J L VARI'L NCF. 01t CU--_---_---- PLANNINC: RF'VII:W (IV DA rE YARDS LOT COVFRAGE 1 f NONT SIUL 1'7EAR ❑ NEW D RESIDENTIAL ❑ GAS (--� LINE FIRE ZONE rY['E OF' CONSTRL)CTION CODE HEIGHT NON-RESIDENTIAL 1 f SIGN DADD - -- RETAINING , SPECIAL INSPECTOR A17EA OCCl/PANCY DEMOLISH ❑ OCCUPANT ❑WALL REQUIRE-U GROUP ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE —_ ❑ YES �� NO_- - _ - LOAD OR PILL � ( X �) � __ _ PLAN cHNcflEu ITV —THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY l Ll REPAIR � ►RC -Move SWIM OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX INSP. POOL B — _— SHOULD HE'."ODED 31.04. Z NUMBER OF STOP IC9 NVMUCR or REMARKS ' 0 owE -LING F• V rill's _____ _------"------'-- ---- L W NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE — f. C F 0 al p W; PLAN CHECK FEL -- -- -- 01 PLOT PLAN VALUATION FfE [ i L r BUILDING tl, —_— — _ 0 PLUMBING. W MECHANICAL FENCE H "Applicant, on behalf his his or her spou>r, belts, a;;il:(u and SIGN __ 0 W successors in in(CtCSI. agrees to indemnify, J 6 y, defend and hold harmless __----- i the City of Edmunds, Washington, its Officials, cutpluyces, :Intl RETAINING WALL < agents from an; and all claims for damages of LL}utcvcl naturt, ---_ u z arising directly or indirectly from the issuance (it' this permit. Issu- SWIMMING POOL — — O ante of Ihis permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce == _— 'r !;Ci•i ti01 U'i ,1rllnt�ilC Ci)c �;t!')jC'cL I)lltic(111,' 1)C`1-n1LC '.l.c_1CLU1l, C O�1VC '. i:l)c fir)?lot.il)., cold::—, nos. , -------__ LEA/LcL.�—__-------_.._._._____._.____------------------------ CITY OF EOMO :9EDIIS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775 25?5 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS October 7, 1980 l'831a4'01ym"p''c"Vew TDrive`";:r._ Edmond's ,-41a-sfi-ington---98020 Dear Mr. Park FILL: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR SUBJECT: QONSTRUCTION ,ON.. LOT 9, BLOCK 2 OF:`ADMIRALTY `ACRES 3 Thank you for your letter of September 25, 1980. A specific plan for the proposed work must still be prepared by,a registered, professional engineer and must still bear his seal, date, and signature. Please have your engineer contact us to obtain specific requirements. The material provided by you thus far is not suffici-enC to allow for construction. If you should have any further citiestions, please write - to Bob Franklin of our Engineering Division. Sincerely, .LAMES E. ADAPTS, P.E. Ci vy Engineer BF/jf ... P�..r6 r )- r Bob Franklin Dt 0 January 29,t To: Harold Reeves Building Department City of Edmonds Certified j S� �t.I FILE F 02 REzla Re: Completion of existing drainage system and filling to eixsting ground level at Lot 9, Block 2, Admiralty Acres and Portion of Tract 106, seaview, Edmonds. Dear Mr. Reeves: As your record may indicate, the application for the permit to connect the gap of the exisiting drainage system and fill to adjacent grotid level of the existing ditch has been made previously. With the instruction from Mr. Robert Franklin,Engieering Dept., at_tF;-� proposed job site. First.application was made in August of last year. Following the review of city official, we have submitted modified plan strictly adhering to the instruction of 8/19/80. We.7have not received any notice of issuance of the permit since the modified application was submitted 9/4/80. We would deeply appreciate immediate processing of the permit. G.R. Severson & Co of Lynwood has our permission to store screened soil on the property for their use elsewhere. I have been informed that they have prepared access ramp to the property from street for more space to store the material. If you have any question, Please contact the firm. ASkl �rely, 18 Olympic View Drive Edmonds. Copy to:G. Bush, Attorney at law G.R. SEVERSON & Co, Lynwood. i S f l CtiECF.L i S T t. The driver i3 responsible for Checking the Pollo-ino daily: I1rc3 vis:bie Wheel Nuts ,ind3hield Wipers Nud Flaps Oil Level RZdiacor COOIEnc LiCrCr Cor.cainer �aCCe:j Li gh C3 ro^1 SafcCV Equip=enz Da_.. Cal':gcs _.` ar.Y iCe= is unsacis- _`acO-Y _`ill our a P�QU�ST .-OR vEHiCL_E R-ZFAiR for=. • C I T Y O F F D N 0 :t D S SI�� PUBLIC WORKS DEPART? F.:: T - 7AlLY VESICLE L.'ODV REPORT K PORT OF U::IT DATE C3 ADDRESS I �j C T��tZ7 ------------------- OUT 0 MiL%nC= I I I I ;J'*.3En � 1 i JOFi ORDER ::0 I ' 1 I I �L GSAND J 41- t7 T Y O F F D H Orr.: O 5 t ? C`fFCI:I_IST - PULLIC WORKS DEP/IRTYF?:T DAILY VDUCL E FORK R POR` ;. The driver is for chccY,inE the foilo-ing REPORT OF U?,IT DAiE: i:c-s drily: W-LI.THER: Tires -_ Vis:blc Whcel NUCS '.:indsnield Wipers r�r� Mud Flaps J03 ADDRESS Oil Lc-cl - RadiaCor Coolant r•�i �� I �Cn�� • Liccer ConCainer Z� - / �accc: j "i:Y.E I:: LiEhca F�arCS 1 Sa coy qu_p�e.^. Dash: Gauges i t _ � I _f any Lee= is 'ac:ory, _`ill out a Pv�l'ES- FOR VEHICI r P-E?AIR for=. EXPLC Y EES A. j ORCEr? :j?`3ER i body JOE) ORDER .:0. • DESCR:PT:C:� )F 1 16 C I T Y O F E.I) H O 1* 5 CHECKLIST - PUBLIC %-'ORY.S DEPART",F27T - 1. The driver is responsible DAILY L'FP{IC.LE WOPK REPORT S for checking the follo.-,inF !tcros daily: REPORT OF UNIT 17L! nFR: TE: Tires VE. THFR : Visible Vheel huts Windshield Wipers � I Mud Flaps JOB ADDRFSS Oil Level Radiator Coolant J/ Litter Container Y Batter Lights TI,�c 7> 7 f� / Piorn Brakes TI". _ OUT I Safety cquipamenc Dash Gauges TRUC= i,S- �n f; I-` any i,em is unsacis- f3CLOrY fill out a FOR VEHICLE REPAIR fo —. } s. e'POr,. new boy da:.S aZ� - .c �.:�.er•�ate suaer:•;sOr- , env ntn�' 11 N D I t i I FILE STREET BILE - CITY OF E ®M ® N ® S HARVE H. HARRISON 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS October 7, 1980 FILE �18314 Olympic View Drive on hi-�ig of n'9`8'0 0 Dear Mr. Park: SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 9,_BLOCK 2 OF ADMIRALTY ACRES Thank you for your letter of September 25, 1980.. A specific plan for the proposed work must still be prepared by a registered, professional engineer and must still bear his seal, date, and signature. Please have your engineer contact us to obtain specific requirements. The material provided by you thus far is not sufficient to allow for construction. If you should have any further questions, please write to Bob Franklin of our Engineering Division. Sincerely, JAMES E. ADAMS, P.E. City Engineer BF/jf .:Bob Franklin Dt Q�iti. 0E P&VIc work' 9/z5/8o Mr. James E. Adams City Engineer City of Edmonds Dear Mr. Adams: Thank you for your lettr of 9/18/80. Following the advice of my attorney, G. Riach, we have withdrawn and altered the plan for the drainage on lot 9. Block 2 of Admiralty Acres. We have abandoned the plan for the retention pond and fill. Thus, culvert( 48" in diameter ), either aluminum or asphalt coated galvanized steel to prevent corrosion, will be placed in preexisting open ditch. The gradient will be same as existing flow. Please refer to the topography map submitted by the current owner Mr. James Braun, Olympic Properties Inc.. He had submitted the map in 1978 for the subdivision of the lot ( Drawn by Lovell, Sauerland & Assoc. Engineer). The extension of the existing culvert will be 80foot northerly and 100 foot southerly as in previously submitted plan. I appreciate your time and cooperation, Han ,'ZPark'� 18314 Olympic view Drive Copy to : Mr. G. Riach Attorney at Law Mr. James Braun, Pres. Ross -Edwards Inc. , Olympic Properties Inc. Edmonds. FILE COPY STREET FILE CITY OF EDM NDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . September 18, 1980 11 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Mr. H. Z. Park 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 I Dear Mr. Park: SUBJECT: DRAINAGE_-&--F-ILL -FOR= LOTt_9 ; -BLOCK 2? ADMIRALTY ACRES The flow restrictor detail you have submitted is a general plan. It specifies minimum standards (eg. 2' minimum clearance) but does not specify actual pipe'sizes, catch basin diameters, etc. The details and dimensions must be specifically designed.for each project by a registered,,professional'engineer. The standard frame and grate, for example, will not have adequate inlet capa- city for a 48-inch pipe: Item 2 of our requirements shown in our "memo of August 19, 1980, means that a specific plan for your situ- ation must be prepared by,the engineer and must bear his seal, date, and signature. The material you have provided so far does not meet Item 2 of our August 19, 1980 memo. The requirements for the grading permits are listed on the enclosed sheet. We are requiring that a registered, professional engineer also prepare the, fill plan and that the plan,bear his seal, date and signature. The material you have provided so far does not meet Item 3 of our memo of August 19, 1980. 1 If you have any questions, please wrilte to me, attention Bob Franklin. Sincerely, JAMES A AMS, P.E. City Engineer RRF:jky Enclosure BOB FRANKLIN 'DT, Code: i Edmonds Building Division 5-79 j GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Uniform Building Code-1976 Permit required except as specified in Section 7003 UBC. Conditional use permit required per 12.16.070 City Code except as provided in Ordinance #1838 for fills under 500 cubic yards. Plans and specifications required as noted in 7006 UBC subject to review and checking per UBC Section 302. On submittal drawing, indicate existing contours, proposed contours, existing drainage courses, proposed drainage courses, existing utilities, existing easements, property lines, existing structures, trees, scale,, north arrow, legal description,'title block, name of person preparing map and date (under certain circumstances, as outlined in UBC Chapter 70, a civil engineer may be required to prepare design data). Bond may be required per Section 7008. Fills shall conform to Section 7010 and cuts to Section 7009. Setbacks per Section 7011. Drainage per Section 7012. Subject to review and approval of City Engineer per Section 11.02.025 City Code. i Erosion control per Section 7013. Inspection per Section .7014. Protection of adjoining property. When.the owner of any lot shall raise or lower the level of such lot by a fill or excavation he shall, at his own expense, protect all adjoining property from encroachment by such fill or from danger of collapse due to such excavation either by the erection of a retaining wall or -by sloping the sides of each fill or excavation entirley within the confines of said lot. Following notes to be included on face of grading; permit applicatio- 1.Permit issued subject to compliance with UBC Code, Chapter 70, including attached requirements. 2. Where no compaction is intended, a note specifying non- structural fill" shall be placed on the permit. 3. Fills without conditional use permit limited to 90 day permit 1ife. w September 8, 1980 Mr. Bob Franklin Engineering Department City of Edmonds Subject: Strom Drainage for Lot 9, Block 2, Admiralty Acres Dear Mr. Franklin: RECEI %L® S EP 1 U-i99p' " Ut Public Works Thank you for your note of September 5, 1980. There is an error that the adress for the drainage you have mentioned. The site is Lot 9, Block 2 of Admiralty Acres, not the adress of my home. As the supplement I have submitted on September 4, the Flow restrictor system have been designed by the Cascade Culvert Co of Arlington and it has been approved by both King County and Snohomish County. Therefore this satisfy the the item 2 of your letter of 8-19-80. Regarding the material for the culvert, I have agreed to change it to aluminum culvert. The fill is to cover the culvert at this time and complete fill will be carried out when the building plan is drawn up in the future. I hope this answers your requirement 1, 2, & 3 of your letter of 8-19-80. If you have any question regarding flow restrictor please check with Cascade culvert Co. Than , H . Z ark 18314 Olmpic View Drive Edmonds 98020 4E w P,44ZV- 3oty1me,4- vtrct--i D2. C-P/,to,uns . RECEIVED SEP it 1980 Dir. Of Public Works Wes. T �G-' Pl/aCt D �C.r)MIA-) 2, FI-Ow RFsTIV C Tvt2 3. FiL(- 5Aow,v 14,5 RS f#vwoo icy Se/9A�2s3T�c SfiEC—� , �Q3v ✓C � MAa.v�/}C � v2F� d � GHsC�D� Cv�r/�2%CG.� DAT': 8 t wmo To: Building Division Community Do ve I o pmen,L, Department FROH; Ent-,,inebring Division' Public Works Departm:ent SUBJECT: After review of the subject b.uildinp, permit application. we have the 1011olving comments: I W. -- . ... - - .. ZZ A-4', XIP 1980 01 Pu is Works OFFSET FRAME GRATE SO THAT �— RESTRICTOR/POLLUTION DEVICE IS \ VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER THE LADDER . GRATE ELEVATION CHAIN — 200 CAPACITY. - SLACK 11hEN GATE IS DOWN WELD CIIA I N TO CB FrA STD. GALV' CB _ = ra STEEPS 0, 5 MIN. .• ' Onra.' OVERFLOW ELEVATION. A•TERTIgHT CLEAN— .;.; SET. TO PROVIDE REQUIRED OUT: GAT WITH .B DETENTION ANl) ADEQUATX, r (CItAGE SLIDE v� OIL ,E1'ARAT ION PROS=: TECTION 2 MI OVERFLOW PI1,E & -•=: N. �;;; r, OUTLTr'T�:�I�IP�",..,. 11UST..HAVE CAPACITY EQUAL: 'GREATER THAN COa�I3INED f INLET 5 ;. - : :. •, � � OUTLET PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE — � 5% _ `:R%:=`5� r•�`�""� /� . � - . x Yee 21. �iDI1IER�'EVATION� i •TA. :; ,. $SSTRI4'TOR PLATE` APPii.0PMTELY,: OiI18T .2 IN. �s •;ram ICE CUT i's-. NOT 't~.Y U2RED' IP SYSTEa9. FOB •POLLUTION :�+- ► '•.-v.v i C',i3' NOTE —ALL a11; <� TA L. PARTS -AND -SURFACES= Af UST BF. MADE - ION DE � /�YBS`:II ' CATClt..'CORROSION RESISTANT i41ATERIAL'=. -• • ER �� LF REOUiRED; _ _' t ,:�, '- _ :O :GALSTANIZEID. COMPLETE'... .,•�: EROSION:PROTECTION . c-_ -•. _ `;•` z. .sA �',;3 - _ '�J :_ 7,:_,,'.:- r ski• _ Srs^. ,_. -._'ate _ \h.• - •.d-_s4• .J _ ASSURED VEI V ED - n a: L • •phi N 9 8 - t - P -4 -- - E - :.: " =. - -�� REST RICZ°OR/POLIAITIODt•=�'� CATCh ASIN P..0. Box 217 ;s 223 DE Arlie ion, TAIL b '_° G•• �i. 'ti � f`ia:- ice' - _ _ ... - _=s_'�. STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Mr. Han Park 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Park: F4000PY September 18, 1980 SUBJECT: SIDE SEWER PERMIT- - -- 18314 Olympic View Drive. HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR You telephoned and requested information regarding a side sewer permit. I can find no record of an application from you for any side sewer installation. If you wish to install a side sewer, you must pre- pare a drawing showing the general location of the structure, the location of the building plumbing stub, the location of the City sewer line and indicate the size and type of pipe to be used. Please bring this information to the Public Works Department and complete an application. Upon receipt of your application and the appropriate drawing we will process the permit and calculate the required fees. This will take from one to two days. When the permit is ready to be issued, we will notify you and advise you of the charges. You can then come in and pay the required fees and the permit is yours. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please contact me. Sincerely, a: � JAPDAMS, P.E. City Engineer JEA/jf_ Enclosure (1) P.S. I am enclosing a sample sid'isewer application. *0 00 —,—a�-w ` ------ -- - — ��--co — -- _—--------- - H- w STREET F6L 40'. 830 0. v. pr-. .CITY OF • E ®M ®N ® S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 ED CITY ATTORNEY Gay Riach P. O. Box 1067: Lynnwood, WA 98036 `' August 19, 1980 • : ltS Deg' Cord»�;acy Uevei. Re'z-. Han Park . Dear Gay: Mary•Lou Block of the Planning Division has asked me.to >:rwrite this letter concerning your client, Han Park; and his pro- posed developments 'in Edmonds. -As you are aware, Mr. Park has had numerous contacts with various City staff members concerning his development projects in Edmonds. As a result of these dis- cussions, misunderstandings have developed which culminated in' the meeting last week with your client and members of the City staff. As a -result of the confusion and misunderstanding that exists, the staff feels it best that there be no further oral communication directly with Mr. Park. Any requests for informa- tion should be put into writing by'•'Mr. Park and will be respond- ed to in writing. Of course, thelstaff would be happy to discus any of Mr. Park's projects verbally with either yourself or with Mr. Park's professional engineers: Please advise your client of the contents of this letter. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Wayne D. Tanaka cc:Mary Lou Block Fred Herzberg Charlie Dibble WDT/al DATE: I'll".10 TO: llllildin" Divisioll COlill"UniLy Development Dcp.irtment FROTH; Engineeri.nj, Division I I ublic Works Depar Linen L SUBJECT: 14 ;;{ter revicc.., of the subject j)uij(jjlj,, 1) c, cL j. a 11 11 �l v e e o a f2 g IA12 70 1,55 Ll A AZ C r 5 C4 I je-C / a'p' to-d 7 �• D1vV STREET FILE (address) SD Street- Right -of -Way Exist IRE Q HAccess . Easements Existing _ ,� o READ a Utility Easement ExistlI-PL�+^CD i w Lot Per Subdivision Plat `�',' �;/ Assessor w Site Plan Checked'for Accuracy — z Wiring Reqd. 1-4Underground E Check Accuracy o : Uga , Descrip ion , z Review by Date w' Existing Water Main Size Water Main Required Service Line Required Hydrant Size Existing P4 Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code Size w Detector, Check Meter ' R:egd . Cross Connection Inspection Fire Department Conments d , 3 Water Meter Charge Reqd. Review by Date Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability Proj. Drawing No. File No. Side Sewer Availability Sanitary Sewer 'Connection.Fee Reqd. 3 Review by Date w • W Open Ditch Existing Reqd. :X Culvert Reqd. Size r.4 Catch Basin Regd.! Indicate on Site Plan Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff H r Manhole reqd. Indicate on Site Plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Review by Date Revised: lv10-1977 � ..�. STREET FILP im *rlr-- File No; U---q CITY OF EDMONDS Date - 2= EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Fee $25.00 Rec't No -,I APPLICATION TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEPJ1IT HEARING DAT APPLICANT: 14AV 2 C.4Qr- ADDRESS Je�jy OE:��9ft� wC'�PHO"�E: 7 � Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: OWNER: /-I/ay Z J} /C ADDRESS� PNONE: 7%e/—G`I,f`j LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS): q 31 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: 1 ofyc� �z r yk i,s.afh h,sa � ik-.T� n� .. ; 1J7 To be completed by the Planning Dept: Use Zone fa Legal description checked and'''' !'cr.,,:, "orh approved by: Date: VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXAMPLE, INDICATING. NORTH. Example: •+-N CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: Lys,►` ►g3�y , t- Xff etcr( aM 612,9 (A4 -,-v CzfC;SS dF a yps aF 012T . DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE:�� ►w =wC(c� w2C 1 • __ C, S-ignahu C of Appo ant, meter, or Representative. STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the St -he Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appearedi7;� .who being duly sworn, on his/ oath deposes and says that he has prepared and read the foregoing statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioped. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for,(,0e St?te - 4 Washington, residing at< -1 ---- - ----- 2— R( I LL . ikusc- vc W,— *y 0c0 IP2,: w- 12 7 Vfic- D ei t1c' "-.,/?y '-L, -24 v fee( X—C�:fl--OPWWT. Aiq�Ofll-FJT Dl,,')-7 1x41c)z,',c-O ")I'-L- / c- ek, Molzc-- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent "7 3. Date Checklist ub i tted 4. Agency.Requiring Checklist 5. Name of Proposal , i f applicable [''A�{j/� r n 7 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): —/''��-�-5��� Cc3 Satyr/' E 4S;V 14eD / 2-0 % /vl 65 H S ��C �fi //mil E s f/ l 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal 9. List of all Pennits,*Licenses, or Government As R pp equired for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): 1V6 hug_ 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. C GrN.O fC OR C o!" Tc=�t��v � � �Q 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 12. Attach any other application .form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? / f b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in o ogr_�pr�y—orr ground surface relief features? ✓ d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ✓ Explanation: C'�/� c% ��✓ 70 a7oG/�4P�k. 14< C1740pjZy r,v �Nc���'ci� it, 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ✓ b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? -2- :J YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow / of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water / in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? / g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception / of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water / supplies? Explanation: 4, Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, / microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c.. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? Explanation: -3- 5. Fauna. WIII the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or j microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species fauna? of c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? /. Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal Tight produce new or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 0 YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ✓ Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing ouh sing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular / movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties,'or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: -5- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? .✓ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development / of new sources of energy? / Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a nee or new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? l d. Sewer or septic tanks? ✓ e. Storm water drainage? f._ Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? j ✓ Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declarat' or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT: ;—�� �'� IC. -7- 00 Edmonds Building Division 5-79 GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Code: Uniform Building Code 1976 Permit required except as specified in Section 7003 UBC. Conditional use permit__ required per- 12 16-:-0-70---City_.Code- except- as provide=d= in Ordinance f1838 for fills= under -500-cub.ic_=yards . Plans and specifications required as noted in 7006 UBC subject to review and checking per UBC Section 302. On submittal drawing, indicate==exi--sting-- contours proposed_- contours, ex s_t-ing—dr-a-iris-ge ,courses, proposed -,drainage _courses-, existi-ng-_uti-lit e=s= =-existing .easements,. prop er-ty- lines,_ existing -_structures,, __tree s_cale,, nor-th--=ar-r-ow-, -1ega-1 =de=scription, �tit1e_ block, name _of=person preparing-map----and-date-.(under certain circumstances, as outlined in UBC Chapter 70, a civil engineer may be required to prepare s design data). Bond may be required per Section 7008. Fills shall conform to Section 7010 and cuts to Section 7009. Setbacks per Section 7011. Drainage per Section 7012. Subject to review and approval of City Engineer per Section 11.02.025 City Code. Erosion control per Section 7013. Inspection per Section 7014. Protection of adjoining property. When the owner of any lot shall raise or lower the level of such lot by a fill or excavation he shall, at his own expense, protect all adjoining property from encroachment by such fill or from danger of collapse due to such excavation either by the erection of a retaining wall or.by sloping the sides of each fill or excavation entirley within the confines of said lot. Following notes to be included on face of grading permit application: 1. Permit issued subject to compliance with UBC Code, Chapter 70, . including attached requirements. 1-1 2. Where no compaction is intended, a note specifying "non- structural fill" shall be placed on the permit. 3. Fills without conditional use permit limited to 90 day permit life. M ban f e open charn.Iel will Or foot above the maximum flow line for the designed storm. 1) "Peak discharge" shall mean the maximum sur- face water runoff rate (cfs) determined for the design storm frequency prior to the development. (12) "Receivinc; bodies of water" shall mean creeks, streams, lakes and other bodies of water into which surface waters are directed, either na- turally of in man-made ditches or open systems. (13) "Retention/detention facilities" shall mean fa- cilities designed either to hold runoff for a short period of time and then releasing it to the natural watercourse or to hold water for a consid- erable length of time and then consuming it by evaporation, plants, or infiltration into the ground. (14) "Subject property" shall mean the tract of land which is the subject of the permit and/or approval action. Section 4. 12.17.030. Submis"s.i�iiTof ,aDra-inac.e. la,n: (1) All persons applying for any of the following permits and/or approvals shall submit for approval a drainage plan with their application and/or 11 request: (a) ,-Grad_i_ng _P_ermi t (b) Substantial development permit required under RCW 90.58 (Shoreline:Management Act) . -4- STREET FILE this was practical under the circumstances and Mrs. McGee saw no other reasonable way to do it. MR. LERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. BYRD, TO APPROVE V-75-79 AS IT APPEARED TO BE A PRACTICAL SOLUTION FOR A LANDLOCKED PIECE OF PROPERTY AND WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA CU-70-79 HAN Z. PARK-�;,r:Condittonal Use , Peit for grading in excess of 500 cu. yds. atQ 3' � .Ympi— ,Vie , RS-12 This proposal was to excavate approximately 2,000 cu. yds. of earth from 7 the applicant's property. Grading would be in the southeast corner of his lot which abuts Olympic View Dr. The result would be to move a fairly steep slope back on the property so he would have a large flat area. The Engineering Division saw no problems which could not be handled and Mr. Pearson said this proposal would not endanger the health and safety of the neighborhood and would not be injurious to abutting property. However, Mr. Pearson could not recommend approval because the policies of the Comprehensive Plan allow grading on steep slopes only for necessary roads and building pads, both of which already exist on the applicant's lot. The public portion of the hearing was opened. The applicant said that when he built the house three years ago he carved out the area and moved the soil to the nearby ravine. He did not feel his present proposal would be detrimental to the adjoining lot, which he also owns. He said when he graded it the first time he seeded the hillside which had been effective, and he planned to do that again and also install some rockery. He had experienced no drainage problems, even during the last bad storm, so he did not anticipate any such problem. No trees would be involved, and he planned to construct a tennis court in the cleared area, along with landscaping it. The public portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO APPROVE CU-70-79 BECAUSE IT DID NOT APPEAR TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF OTHERS IN THE VICINITY AND BECAUSE THE TYPE OF USE TO BE MADE SUBSEQUENT TO THE CHANGE IS PERMITTED IN THIS ZONE AND IT WILL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. MOTION CARRIED. V-77:7_ GLEN E. BARRETT -Variance for lot width to length ratio -at 7700 175th ~St. S.W.R-2y— _ V-78-79 r This application was in conjunction with a 4-lot subdivision. The Zoning Code requirement for lot width to length ratio is .4 and the proposal was to reduce that to approximately .25. The applicant indicated this lot would not be built upon by itself but would be incorporated into the property west of Lot 4 which is also owned by the applicant. Mr. Pearson recommended approval on the condition that a covenant be placed on Lot 4 requiring that it not be a building site unless combined with the applicant's adjoining property to the west. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Jurgen Sauerland of Lovell-Sauerland and Associates, representing the applicant, said there would be no objection to the recommended covenant. The public portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO APPROVE V-77-79, SUBJECT TO A COVENANT'S BEING PLACED ON LOT 4 IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS THAT LOT 4 NOT BE MADE A BUILDING SITE EXCEPT IN COMBINATION WITH PROPERTY TO THE WEST, THE ESSENSE OF GRANTING THIS VARIANCE BEING TO TREAT THE PROPERTY AS HAVING A CHANGE IN LOT LINE. THE REASON FOR APPROVING THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY NOT GENERALLY APPLICABLE TO OTHER PROPERTY IN THE AREA, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE ZONING CODE FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORMAL MANNER WOULD DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT OF RIGHTS COMMONLY ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT. MOTION CARRIED. UOSEPH-CLIFFORD~- Va M ante from`? height limitation and side and rear setbacks �a .1856483r"ve. bl.. The proposal was to legalize an existing treehouse/platform that is too close to the side and rear property lines and is too high. It is 37' high, the maximum height being 25'. If a variance on the height were granted the maximum it could be would be 35', so even with a variance it would have to BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 2 - November 21, 1979 Edmonds Building Division 5-79 i GRADING ' PERMIT REQUIREMENTS STREET FILE Coder Uni-form Building'Code 1976 Permit required except as specified in Section 7003 UBC. 'onditional use permit required=per lj2-=16-070= City Coale--exce;�.t_ as prov ded�in Ordinan Y�1�8'3'8 for f'ills- under�-S�JO�cub:ic yards . Plans and specifications required as noted in 7006 UBC subject to review and checking per!UBC Section 302. On submittal drawing,' in-di=e-aTt- ee xis-t ng-conaou-r-s,, 'cp.ro.p..o.s-ed�contours , .e:xis:t.in!g�-d-r-a= n-a-ge -e,our-&e-s , propose:d.-dr_a.inage�eo_urs.es, exis-ting�ut- �l times ex-is=Bing .e,a-s:eze-nts, pro-pe:rt-�y--l: ne:sz e-xi.st-i'ng-,--str_-uc_:ture_s_, trzees.-scale„ nor-tea-r-rower 1Qa1 descrip't-ion, I�ti.tl-e =b=lock, nameof�p-er-s:on p-r1eparfnYg-map;—, an,d-d�ate�, (under certain circumstances, as outlined in UBC Chapter'70,-a civil engineer may be required to prepare design data). ; Bond may be required per Section 7008. Fills shall conform to Section 7010 and cuts to Section 7009. Setbacks per Section 7011. Drainage per Section 7012. Subject to review and approval of City Engineer per Section 11.02.025 City Code. Erosion control per Section 7013. Inspection perlSection 7014. I � Protection of adjoining property. When the owner of any lot shall raise orllower.the level of such lot by a fill or excavation he shall, at his own expense, protect all adjoining property from encroachment by such fill or from danger of collapse due to such excavation either by the erection,of a retaining wall or -by sloping the sides of each fill or excavation entirley within the confines of said lot. i Following notes to be included on face of grading, permit application: 1. Permit issued subject to compliance with UBC Code, Chapter 70, including attached requirements.,- 2. Where no compaction:is intended, a note specifying "non- structural;fill" shall be placed on the permit. -3. Fills without conditional use permit limited to 90 day permit life. . j tir' , =i -"+'^"^'C^'-f tee- ••'-•---'.._._.._...-----�.. •- +---....— -. , _:.�,..,.lxc:..� a, 'T'"--- q this was practical under the circumstances and Mrs. McGee saw no other reasonable way to do it. MR. LERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. BYRD, TO APPROVE V-75-79 AS IT APPEARED TO BE A PRACTICAL SOLUTION FOR A LANDLOCKED PIECE OF PROPERTY AND WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED. .���� FILE AGENDA S CU-70-79 HAN Z. PARK - Conditional-Oij Permit for grading in excess of 500 cu. yds. at Y., 83 y-Rymp,ic, View Dr.,.,,j (RS-12) a.. This proposal was to excavate approximately 2,000 cu. yds. of earth from the applicant's property. Grading would be in the southeast corner of his lot which abuts Olympic View Dr. The result would be to move a fairly steep slope back on the property so he would have a large flat area. The Engineering Division saw no problems which could not be handled and Mr. Pearson said this proposal would not endanger the health and safety of the neighborhood and would not be injurious to abutting property. However, Mr. Pearson could not recommend approval because the policies of the Comprehensive Plan allow grading on steep slopes only for necessary roads and building pads, both of which already exist on the applicant's lot. The public portion of the hearing was opened. The applicant said that when he built the house three years ago he carved out the area and moved the soil to the nearby ravine. He did not feel his present proposal would be detrimental to the adjoining lot, which he also owns. He said when he graded it the first time he seeded the hillside which had been effective, and he planned to do that again and also install some rockery. Fie had experienced no drainage problems, even during the last bad storm, so he did not anticipate any such problem. No trees would be involved, and he planned to construct a tennis court in the cleared area, along with landscaping it. The public portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO APPROVE CU-70-79 BECAUSE IT DID NOT APPEAR TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF OTHERS IN THE VICINITY AND BECAUSE THE TYPE OF USE TO BE MADE SUBSEQUENT TO THE CHANGE IS PERMITTED IN THIS ZONE AND IT WILL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. MOTION CARRIED. V-77-79 GLEN E. BARRETT- Variance for lot width to length ratio at 7700 175th St. S. w. R - This application was in conjunction with a 4-lot subdivision. The Zoning Code requirement for lot width to length ratio is .4 and the proposal was to reduce that to approximately .25. The applicant indicated this lot would not be built upon by itself but would be incorporated into the property west of Lot 4 which is also owned by the applicant. Mr. Pearson recommended approval on the condition that a covenant be placed on Lot 4 requiring that it not be a building site unless combined with the applicant's adjoining property to the west. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Jurgen Sauerland of Lovell-Sauerland and Associates, representing the applicant, said there would be no objection to the recommended covenant. The public portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO APPROVE V-77-79, SUBJECT TO A COVENANT'S BEING PLACED ON LOT 4 IN FAVOR OF .THE CITY OF EDMONDS THAT LOT 4 NOT BE MADE A BUILDING SITE EXCEPT IN COMBINATION WITH PROPERTY TO THE WEST, THE ESSENSE OF GRANTING THIS VARIANCE BEING TO TREAT THE PROPERTY AS HAVING A CHANGE IN LOT LINE. THE REASON FOR APPROVING THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY NOT GENERALLY APPLICABLE TO OTHER PROPERTY IN THE AREA, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE ZONING CODE FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORMAL MANNER WOULD DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT OF RIGHTS COMMONLY ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT. MOTION CARRIED. V-78-79'JOSEPH•CLIFFORD r-wTVBriance`rftrom height limitation and side and rear setbacks The proposal was to legalize an existing treehouse/platform that is too close to the side and rear property lines and is too high. It is 37' high, the maximum height being 25'. If a variance on the height were granted the maximum it could be would be 35', so even with a variance it would have to BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 2 - November 21, 1979 / -- - -------------------- / J� 1� E% DL vc. pet H-,'I..(- oij CA 2 /Vj � 4 STREET'FILE p��y HARVE H. HARRISON �'�� ®�®�i/lNaA�®w�. f I MAYOR ' CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 . (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I . i ti April 20, 1979 Han Z. Park 18314 Olympic View Drive 30 Edmonds, Wa. 98020 7— CHANGE OF ADDRESS In order to solve addressing problems related to postal delivery and to improve response time in emergency situations,.it has become necessary to make addressing changes on Olympic View Drive.. (Your -new--address will be 7704 Olympic ViewDrive We will -notify - our Utility Billing Department - and it is your responsibility to notify all other: interested parties. Harry M Whitcutt Buildin' Official HMW/ae. cc: Utility Billing Fire.Dept. Police Dept. S I- bc� $- TR, � EE. T '. � I L E November 6, 1978 MEMO FOR RECORD SUBJECT: OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE', MR. HAN PARK PROPERTY On November 1, 1978, at 2:30 p.m. I met with Mr. Han Park and found there to be more actors than the attached indicates. Apparently a Mr. Spanfelriet. of_ the Building Division gave Mr. Park the right to push some dirt over the slope of the subject property. He failed to advise Mr. Park of the necessary right- of-way permit. After an inspection it was discovered that too much dirt -had been pushed over the slope. Mr. Park hired an equipment contractor, Forbes, to remove some of the dirt. Mr. Spanfelrier informed Forbes to remove more, thus re oving vegeta- ttion holding the hill. Mr. Park objected, but ha � been over- ruled. There are muddy the $70.00 we point. FFH : j ak apparently enough countering confusions to sufficiently situation so no resolution: could be found within the might recoup. The matter should be dropped at this eet Supt . Dt. " (/� " min Sec. Dt. P.W. Dir. Dt. During the fal0o.0977, Mr. Pa- {: had cor.I*: d* landsc;ine grading i-mp<rovemenLs along his r;roperLy adjoi-ninF; the 01yr1nic View Drive right-of-way. . Durin-, the bulldozer ;radinr oper:l- tions on his property, exces-s'eacth had been pushed over and down the steep slope bank which resulted in co c:ipleLe covering of the roadway shoulder and open drainage diLchline. The Building Division was -notified of this condition and had re- quested Mr. Park to have the material cleaned up on tl;e shoulder and ditchline and remove excess material from the lower portion of the batik; to, prevent further sl.idinl and erosion. No attempt was made by the owner to correct the condition as requested after the notification by the Division. Consequently, during the rains prior Lo Decc;ber. 11, the loose earth had become saturated with nioisLure and resulted in continuous erosion on to the southbound road,av traffic lane, tivlhi.ch was cleaned up on one previous occasion by Street Division crews prior to the above incident. On Saturday, December 10, 1977, weel.encl call -out cmerC.ency crews were notified of,a mud slide on the road,.aay at this location and it was barricaded temporarilv. On Sundav, December 11, after continued rains, the condition beca^e very hazardous to public safety. Bobby Mills, Street Foreman Was advised of the emergency. by.the..Police. Department and follo�-.- ed up with contact and advised Mr.. Park that the slide mtater- ial must be cleared from the roadway. I-Ir. Part: indicated he was unable_ to obtain anyone -for cleaning; during the i eekend. Mr. Mills then advised hire that Street Division, crews i•70uld do the work and thaL he would be billed for labor and enuin- menL time. Mr. Park indicated that this verbal arran event was agreeable. _ - STREET FILE0 CITYCITY OF E13MC9FM®S HARVE H. HARRISON 11mE1 @,si7 S Y/ � m7 MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 September 20, 1978 10 503- Mr. Han Z. Park 18314 Olympia View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Park: SUBJECT: ROADWAY SLIDE_ RESTORAT-ION — 1�8�3�14 OhYMP�LC�.=-.VIEW=DR-IUE= Referring to your letter of September S, 1978, the charges you have indicated as not justified have been personally investigated. It has been determined that the slide conditions were.a result of grading operations which were performed on your property. Accordingly, it appears that the City bill is justified. If you have any further questions on the matter, please contact my assistant,.Charles Dibble., Very truly yours, Harve H. Harrison Mayor HHH / j g cc Finance Director CITY OF EDW3N®S CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 Mr. Han Z. Park 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020_ Dear Mr. Park: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR September 19, 1978 SUBJECT: ROADWAY SLIDE RESTORATION - 18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE Referring to your letter of September 5, 78, the charges.you have indicated as not justified. ave been personally investigated. It has been det ined.that the slide conditions were a result of -ceding operations which were performed on your property Accordingly, th- City bill is justified. Your remittance of the present charges is requeste Yours very truly, HARVE H. HARRISON Mayor AAB:LRL:lsc CC: Finance Director V 194 Sup Dt. (;44`c. t. Director Dt._ &0 9` 11 Exec. Sec. Dt. MAA Dt. e k September 18, 1978 MEMO TO: Charles Dibble Mayor's Administrative Assistant FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: ROADWAY SLIDE RESTORATION - 18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DR. In response to the letter from Mr. Han Park in question of justification for.the restoration charges for earth slide erosion on December 11, 1977, information for justification is as follows: During the fall of 1977, Mr. Park had completed landscape grading improvements along his property adjoining the.Olympic View Drive right-of-way.. During the bulldozer grading opera- tions on his property, excess earth had been pushed over and down the steep slope bank which resulted in complete covering of the roadway shoulder and open drainage ditchline. The Building Division was notified of this condition and had re- quested Mr. Park to have the material cleaned up on the shoulder and ditchline and remove excess material from'the lower portion of the bank, to prevent further sliding and erosion. No attempt was made by the owner to correct the condition as requested after the notification by the Building Division. Consequently, during the rains prior to December 11, the loose earth had become saturated with moisture and resulted in continuous erosion on to the southbound roadway traffic lane, which was cleaned up on one previous occasion by Street Division crews prior to the above incident. On Saturday, December 10, 1977, weekend call -out emergency crews were notified of a mud slide on the roadway at this location and it was barricaded temporarily. On Sunday, December 11, after continued rains, the condition became very hazardous to public safety. Bobby Mills, Street Foreman was advised of the emergency by the Police Department and follow- ed up with contact and .advised Mr. Park that the slide mater- ial must be cleared from .the roadway. Mr. Park indicated he was unable to obtain anyone for cleaning during the weekend. Mr. Mills then advised him that Street Division crews would do the work and that he would be billed for labor and equip- ment time. Mr. Park indicated that this verbal arrangement was agreeable. i • Memo to: Charles Dibble September 18, 1978 Sub: Roadway Slide Restoration 18314 Olympic View Drive Considering the time spent by City personnel on contacting Mr. Park and on emergency cleanup operations it is my con- clusion thatthe chargesare well justified. Accordingly the attached letter has been prepared for the Mayor's signature. Please contact me for any further information or -questions. AAB:gl ,�Ze ez, andin Dt. in.. Dt. DirecOkr Dt. .k September .15, 1978 MEMO TO: Charles Dibble Mayor's Administrative Assistant FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: ROADWAY SLIDE RESTORATION - 18314 OLYMPIC VIEW DR. In response to the letter from Mr. Han Park in question of justification for the restoration charges for earth slide erosion on December 11, 1977., information for justification is as follows: During the fall of 1977, Mr. Park had completed landscape grading improvements along his property adjoining the Olympic View Drive right-of-way. During the bulldozer grading opera- tions on his property excess earth had been pushed over and down the steep slope bank which resulted in complete covering of the roadway shoulder and open drainage ditchline. The Building Division was notified of this condition and had re- quested Mr. Park to have the.material cleaned up on the shoulder and ditchline and remove excess material from the lower portion of the bank, to prevent.further sliding and erosion. No attempt was made by the owner to correct the condition as requested after the notification by the Building Division. Consequently, during the rains prior to December 11, the loose earth had become saturated with moisture and resulted in continuous erosion on to the southbound roadway traffic lane, which was cleaned up on one previous occasion by Street Division crews prior to the above incident. On Saturday, December 10,-1977, weekend call -out emergency crews were notified of a mud slide on the roadway at this. location and it was barricaded temporarily. On Sunday, December 11, after continued rains, the condition became very hazardous to public safety. Bobby Mills, Street Foreman was advised of the emergency by the Police Department and follow- ed up with contact and advised Mr. Park that the slide mater- ial must be cleared from the roadway. Mr. Park indicated he was unable.to obtain anyone for cleaning during the weekend. Mr. Mills then advised him that Street Division crews would do the work and that he would be billed for labor and equip- ment time. Mr. Park indicated that this verbal arrangement was agreeable. k Memo to: Charles Dibble September 15, 1978 Sub: Roadway Slide Restoration 18314 Olympic View Drive For considerable time spent by City personnel for numerous calls requesting cleanup responsibilities by the property owner, also clearing operations and emergency call -out barricading time prior to the above occurrence, it is determined these charges are well justified. Please contact me for any further information or questions. CITY OF E D M 0 N D S TO: SUSS ATE: Lu a � 9/ 19/_7.8= 0 z MAYOR As We Discussed MAYOR'S ADMIN. ASS'T. Investigate and report XX CHIEF of POLICE Take Appropriate CITY ATTORNEY XX Action CITY CLERK Prepare Letter/Memo for COMMUN. DEVELOP. DIR. My Signature Mayor's Signature FINANCE DIRECTOR Previously Ref'd FIRE CHIEF Status of Action? For your Information Note & File PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR - l Return to: COMMENTS: please investigate and report back. We have notified Art not to send any more letters or turn over +„ +ho ri+v Attornev until we instruct. FROM: Charl i e Mr. Harve H. Harrison Mayor City of Edmonds Edmonds, Wash. 98020 Dear Your Honor: September 5, 1978 t 1978 Executive Offices Regarding the notification from Department of Finance as you may see in enclosure, I have been troubled to find the justifiction for the charge. As I recall .the incident had occured on your property( as a right of way ) adjacent to my property. I would like have a reexamination of the case by some one in your office and a clarification regarding this matter. The survey map shows the spot of mud as right of way ac►r the hill belongs to you. I am enclosing the copy of map showing the situation. I hope the clarification is made siftly and without much problem. Sinc irelyt you -s-;) 1831 Olympic view Drive Edmonds 1. Ilk CITY OF ED ONDS CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Mr. Han Park 18218 80th Ave bl Edmonds, Wa 98020 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR August 2.8, 1978 Mr. Park: . This'second notice is in regards to invoice AIRS 70029 dated necember 19, 1977 in the amount of.$70.99. Our records indicate that this invoice is several months past due. This is your last notice before this matter is referred to the City Attorney.. Please submit your payment to the City Treasures within fifteen (15) days of this notice. Sincerely, x Arthur,!'-'Housler Finance Director n r CITY OF ADM Edmonds, Washington Invoice No. RS 70029 Job No. S7/028 . Date December 19, 1977 Your order No. Sold To MR. HAN PARK 18218 80th AVE.W. EDMONDS, WA. 98020 Clean mud slide from roadway 12-11-77 between 180th and.76th Ave. - LABOR $44.39 EQUIPMENT 26.60 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $70.99 PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT TO EDMONDS CITY.TREASURER, STREET FUND. C� • DS S T R J 7 D A .L ACCONPLIIS,HED Day oc 41 0, z MOWN Wii 11 IF ,01, R I 0 ZY — ..,v 7 E Dom'', 0 S S T R i G REPORT OF 1;�; nCCGtfi LIS;IE:U ./� Day of J J owl / i �• / • .ft.— ��, i � ,*STREET- FILE i to CITY OF EOMq-3PJDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS October 20, 1978 Mr. Han Z. Park_ 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr: Park: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR After your last conversation with Charles Dibble of Mayor Harrison's office, I have been asked to resolve with you the matter of charges for restoring the earth slide on December 11, 1977. It is over 10 months since this event occurred and we would like to clear up the problem immediately. Please contact me at 775-2525 before October 27, 1978,. so we can arrange to meet. I appreciate your cooperation. Very truly yours, Fred Herzberg City Engineer FH:kr zoh e. rg dt dm n. dt Director r dt OoTREET FILE CITY OF ED�,•INDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS April 21, 1978 Mr. Han Park 1 18314 Olympic View Drive Edmonds; Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Park: SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL ON CITY PROPERTY Following an inspection by Don Burton, Buildings & Grounds Superintendent, and Bobby Mills, Street Division Fore- man, of property adjacent to vours, it was felt that the subject tree is not a health and safety hazard to the general public. Therefore, we are advising you that should you desire to have the tree removed, it would be your responsibility to pay a licensed tree removing company to remove same. Prior to removal, there must be an application made to the Public Works Department requesting a permit to have trees removed by the contractor of your choice and to hold the City free of any liability that might be incurred during the removal process. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Don Burton at 775-2525, extension 243. Yours very trulv, LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works DWB : j a c Qi% 14/a 16,c eoVW7, y /z ,,/ 7 B& G Supt. Dt. Street F reman DT. reet Supt. Dt. min Sec. Dt. 4 C DOODLE PAD �Y BLANKs and FACES Pacemaker Industries, Inc. BOX 11627 - SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99211 PHONE (509) 928.3456 - "THE SIGN PEOPLE" 0 • Statutory Warranty. Deed ; THI.GRANTOR W. E. SHULTZ and THELMA SHULTZ, his wife, for and in consideration 'of Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) in hand paid,conveys and warrants to the City of, Edmonds the following described real estate, situated in the (bounty of Snohomish Washington: Lot 12, Admiralty Acres, according to Plat thereof recorded in Volume 12, Page 48, records of Snohomish County, Washington NO SALES TAX' REQUIRED JUN 2 4 19136 k1k,1-�1PAPS, sno;W�±C.LldZ ly Ifeasum Ly C.LzzV, Qoputy y of 1966. Dated this (lay � _. �C�'L.�.-.4...,.--_:�=.�•�' % _ (SEAL) STATE OF WASHINGTON, f :/ SS. County of SN01-10MISH , On this day personally appeared before me W. E. SHULTZ and THELMA SHULTZ, his wife, , l,L to mu Itnuwn Ir��,,�. Nft�„tndiv�+luaf; described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and ackuowlcdge�L`Lt��tl.l� signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and iwrk+;w,�tifii�i+�ticr✓oned. �jind' h:1a«a;gfticial seal this day of 1966 � r • �1 ';�'0I',�',, , Notary Pablic in and for theState of Washington, r, residing at /_. OFFICIAL .�,e_, r �A RECORDS von. ' n w v .._ . � •, ; v � r i.i . �, V `t' l- � h I" � •y "f r -r �. �. r•..7 7 SEE MAPIP P147' FILE REGAA0146.. THE VACATIOVS L .err - - - b AipU, F,:: r Y" ql TN T. o �.11U. `". 30 a EAV EW Qi r.0 a ' 180t L° m !: 0 ;GO VACAT9p FIR HI 4 oab. is7 ADD. 4+ 90 Y 1 ,2 3 3 DYER'S' I 3 5 4 kjo i81 ST.� Pt.. 4 181 ST PL- S.W. 5 r 1 SEAVIEW 5 HOMES 30 ~ ADMIRALTY ACRES 6 7 8 67. t3 ° ST. S.W. 7 90, ° VILL E 2u S'^ II 30I 30 „t�k.r! 182 Nt? P 9 ( 2, .12, 11 10 14 13 IVACATED °� u r ' y 9. so F' 8 RD, 1352 :' r.• �` .s �.. '0 I 0 �a , I 11 s 9 (1757S'70)3(o 10 N 0 T OPEN »Qw .an(y ,, Go H 1 12 60 •.-�(j' H �. y�. �iJt ,1 til;f �s�. . � l,}� N,1-Ft:1'r i + k.e 1 ? E N +' f+•, I 10 cArEu13 1 8 r <f r�15> J Q7 16 h T�; 1 2 3 4 �' ;.,P A,,, , K' �0 6 I T ► 18 (9 20 21 ! N ON'S A D D NLJ V. .j. 5 22 (2176�5 4 3,. �: D 1 NO. 1 185 PL. SW 5 ��� 0 4 3 COVRT 25 24 23 i` 2 1 C C A . (1 7 7 al Znr . ' ' C#,1147 01 rK PSz7 v42 cr-P2S'4 v42 CA P546 SEA MV IN PLAT FILE REGAI'20Ini6. THOE VACAr►oNs . IN t14 NIW %Q, o� z'S' �� yp i —TBUTH �-o1:sw. 60 90 10 41, 0 EAV EW Qi 70 ;;` ••;,, L VACArr,D GOTHI j oab- 1576 FIR 2 f.,{ ADD. 2 3 g0 t, X 1 .2 3 DYER'' 1 3 5 ia1 > 4 1 1 c r„z 0 181, sT, PL. 4 181 ST PLOF S.W. 5 i, 4 5 5 - , Q SEAVIEw HOMES 30 ADMIRALTY 1 A CAR �6 � 7. 8 6 7 e V, L L E Za 0 ST. S.W. 7 80 i 9 34 30 ' 15 c. ; 14 1 f ' VACATED 9 RD 1352 s o ;o. 9 0 Q75•�970 3(011 10 d9 N0T OPEN ,• q � till t'� � �� x'� � N I $ Q �• I 6' H I EN 12 a(il(�IGN'Abt p IfLp `°ley,• iaktl A10117 . .1 CATE . r ,•! r 13 .eKw a h. `, •,„ Zvi' r.. , 9 F, 106 . r • .Y, "fyl��,7Vi; ..W '4 9;.' .1 .. • ii 14 8 I- 15 ii ly ,� ,e G L N Z 3 41 p A ►(. f� 6 , 1'T 18 19 l;2�00932 g HEN O N N t, to; ; a, 2 0 2 I n S ADD I. r 5 . , D 1 v. N o. 85 PL. 1� ' �" SW 22 �2 s� r'y s C. 6 �_. a 2125 24 23 STREET, FILE CITY OF E®N1111"IN®S CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9802C: • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL ' March 8, 1978 Mr. Han _Park 18314`0_lymp.ic_View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Park: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR An inspection was conducted by a member of the Sewer Division of the Public Works Department which revealed that fill dirt has been placed over an existing sanitary sewer manhole within a City utility easement located on your property. The manhole should not have been covered. Alternatives for you would be to raise the manhole or remove the fill. Any work within a City utility easement also requires a Right - of -Way Construction Permit. It is requested that you take action on this matter immediately to complete one of the alternatives within three weeks after obtaining the permit. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Larry Ogle, at 775-2525, ext. 223, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Yours very truly, SIGI'E LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works RHA:ly �$ ZV193 As's"t.C.E.1 date Ogle f a-a'-Ee AdPin.Se ate Flu, A ltls wopigv 0A Twl,s 3/9/78 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SENT TO co Mr. Han Park POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND NO. CY) 00 8-3-14-0.1lyp-i c_ _ _Vi ew D -m P.O., STATE AND ZIP COD 04 14�RETURN Ed%g &FRVA#-�0_1 WIL U-42 FEES 1. Shows TO *10l d delivered .......... RECEIPT With restricted delive ry SERVICES Shows to whom, date where delivered ;I-cg With restricted it liveO ry ............ ... .... RESTRICTED DELIVERY SPECIAL bdivtKy (extra fee required) ..................... . . .....y. PS Form Jan. 19763800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) GPO: 1975-0-591-452 lq-71 T EST FILE ate. -ram �� -el *STREET FILE � �_M G I N111 M- 1010% � MEMO TO: Building Division Community Development Department FROM: Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: 18314 OL MM V /EW I= I lit, PMM IT ON L.IY N After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: (1) Coordination of the location of any structure with respect to. utilities, streets, property lines and driveway grades is the responsibility of the contractor. 2) The contractor is required to kee the abutting streets clean- ed of dirt an e ris caused by the construction. (3) A "Right -of -Nay Construction Permit" is required, from the Engineering Division of Public Works, for any work within the Public Right -of -Way or public easement. (4) Driveway slope not to exceed 14%. FZAIi� .,� �: ► - Cam:' ���•I tea- PW S/77 a 1L z rUA.AA P1Ji:I IC 1-*0R',-S P::PT. (,!1:(..', LISP � '��� �` �• 1 _ 3 f Strcet Riellt-of-1'av 1?xistins Y / �� 1u 1P mA1. — /Access I:asmmits Rxistinf; Utility 1:1scinont 1 <istin. :2/ � C � , � "_� � � •. PJ�11 + Lot Pcr Suhdiv.;sion Plat Y. Asscssor-I!ao Site Plan (7:cc1ed fo-, Accuracv tE=-)I4a) I ! I l5?(lcrr`rcu';d !:irir.^ �% Ij 1�istinP l,atcr '•;'Ain Si �^ /(ff-;`• _ _ le I� 1';atc•r ::"cin !'c`(::rired ii I�.•(']":'..'lt I:a. .1•(`(1 !lr?I h'I(E' �.''�(_�`7 T1:: tect Cyr r%I)n,:;-it(�11 f I� ;i^-•11C l*::ili: P(`1]:;i.t r(:i:;ll.]-C(1 !'(`rl'lit �7(1. t i I I c ----"rcli.�---------- ]1ral:'In'; .',C). Pilc :o. ! �, !I S:.c'- Scl:cr :1�?i.];(I;il.it„----'--�-------.--.------------ i ' (' Sar?i taiy S(';-vr c:o;;:2;,c::i.ci2 1'ce Pcoldl-C l - ---'-- ----- — i, d - -- R.cxn:iI-cc ='— /?r ,��•;� ,cam ' CuIv : _ I'cclliri:d ;j Size Catch Pcm i red // Ind; cafe oil r]':c Plan --� II i!:I1?i?olc rc?(il;:r`:c':TI?dicate or. Site i'l:ul -- I i li ..;oil Col 2di',don,. CI G2'olm2 !',(l1.CI' field l.! cc".Cd t I !ICV1 e1! I — f Y sL 1N - 1latte `e� / w 11:11?^ (TIT -CI, LIST- Jc�. D;lD)C/C [9'7�JT ��'7�/ --- ~- Street Pdrht-t-E-L'ay Existing_ TZHOD Access Easements Fxistin.g &beL=� Lot Pcr Subdiv;sion P1 at Assessor Tap Site Plan (Ileded for Accuracy. ts by 3q`zic Tzf: 3cptjc prn""it oc/ /ircJ Suiitory 3c,cr Avxilai.i]icy Drnj/ill %o._____________ — U Er -----`-------------'----------------- �htn ------------ -------------`---- ' | !'rnv�� '\`, ------------ -----�—'---- / � !`zni. __----__-__- Fi]c �'o,_____._______________-__-_- / C�pcli Ditch 67 N'11,1101c required Indicate oil Site 1,13m) Review by— Strcet Pavin,(; Rcrlui rod —..�� — ---•,fir; \- Curb and Ctittcr Sidcw lh Pcoui.rccl`��,� Dii,) (lit for Privoway Re ulrc( PiConstruction Pcli,li.t Rcolli:r`cd,� Bond Pcruired for Public I vroverlents Str.cct ?able Si.Sn Rcr;itircd Qthcr sioni.ns; Itcnui rcd_— I� }'rc Pcrnit Sitc Inslicction rac?c on Water �I i II sipecial, Requirc-cuts listca ill mcm'o to BuiIC':1n(" 1�-P'?rti:icnf —Date i�� J. i. �cas fi..lJ.cd in en }',,tilclin}; Pclhl.it Application atc C: to I �; 1 1}:}lrcvccl icy Puhli c }:'or};�: J�CPartrlent DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE WATER S T R E E T adu �y SEWER STD PET FIE CITY of EDMONDS --- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Routing of Building Permit.Appl.ications Proposed Property Address of Application: _ 18314 Olympic View Drive jo f CD �o J 7� C -ter NOTES BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS USE ZONE PERMIT (^ "' ['j C NUMBER RECOVED ' f4ILDING DEPARTMENT Applicant Fill . PERMIT APPLICATION Side Heavy Lines ,oB ADDRESS NAME (OR NAME OF^BUSINESS) _ 1 �- / 7 14� LEGAL LOT LOT EA 1 SU" VI N i�,� W9 �,Sr'$ljp(. ❑ YES ❑ NO W MAILING ADDRESS _ ' Z 3 , � �V� L -lJ( VARIANCE OR COND. USE NO. ADB NO. CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER ' = 7 r� PROPOSED YARDS HEIGHT FRONT SIDE REAR 'Q NAME ALLOWABLE PROPOSED '1 IL I- SIGN AREA SIGN AREA U W f ADDRESS OTHER I. REQUIREMENTS U E CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL DATE Q NAME - - STREETR/W EXISTING STREET R/W FT, DEFICIENCY' T HISPROPERTV K //i ADDRESS / ) Q COMP, PLAN ST. R/W FT. FT. E p U CITY tom' . f . ��l TELEPHONE NUMBER LL r, C ( G] J REMARKS Z W CHECKED BY t W Z STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER .2 jr 0 Legal Description of Property. Below or Attach Four Copies) �'�' STREET AND/OR UTILITY ❑ YES WORK REQ'D El NO UNDERGROUND ❑ YES W Z WIRING REQ'D ❑ NO O F„ a , TYPECONNECTION - VERIFIED BY ie U to W p J Q ❑ YES SEPTIC SYSTEM APPVO BY CITY ENG. ❑ NO PERMIT NUMBER W W m REMARKS W ' J METER SIZE SERVICE SIZE CLEARANCE CHECKED BY [r W r REMARKS Q 3 _ II y NEW LJ RESIDENTIAL❑GAS LINE FIRE ZONE, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE 11: I ❑ NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ SIGN ADD ❑ RETAINING DEMOLISH D WALL ❑ ALTER ❑ EXCAVATE FENCE OR FILL �•I X FT) . SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED ❑ YES ❑ NO JAREA OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD F PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE •IS LOCATED IN THE CITY w ❑PRE -MOVE SWIM REPAIR ❑ INSP. POOL OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX '•SHOULD BE CODED 1 REMARKS Z NUMBER OF STORIES / ( NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 0 J m. NATURE OF WORK TO B E ,Z PLAN CHECK VALUATION FEE — PROPOSED USE 0 NO, a PLOT PLAN INDICATE BUILDING.SETBACKS, • ABUTTING STREETS). BUILDING . _ U N W PLUMBING 0 HEAT & GAS LINE m O FENCE ' SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL - 182 pN D 6.0 ST. S.W. 7 90 15 _ -- i 8 2 �p I 7 14 _ 8 9 so 311 --70pq.. 9 O 11 10 o NOT OPEN � H16-0EN 12 / 60 10 - 13 9 a 14 106 8 -- = 15 7 F- -- -- --- z 0 S . W. 0) 16 ti G L !V 4 P A R K 6 17 18 19 20 2 — -- _ T REFER TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE ST-3-70 CITY OF EDMONDS AMENDMENT TO OFFICIAL STREET MAP ORD. NO. 1540 DATE APR. 6, 1971 MAYOR ATTEST CITY CLERK 9 2 ORDINANCE NO. IA W) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AMENDING THE OFFICIAL STREET MAP ADOPTED BY SECTION 12.03.080 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, AS AMENDED, BY REVISING THE LOCATION OF A FUTURE STREET, 183RD PLACE S.W. BETWEEN 80TH AVENUE WEST -AND OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE, ALL AS PROVIDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 350. WHEREAS, pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 350, the City Council of the City of Edmonds called a public hearing regarding the following proposed public right-of-way revision, and, WHEREAS, after due consideration of existing and future neighborhood and traffic conditions, and the general safety, welfare and health of the public, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Official Street Map adopted by Section 12.03:080 of the Edmonds City Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by revising the location of that future street, 183rd Place S.W. between 80th Avenue West and Olympic View Drive as -set forth in Exhibit "A", Reid, Middleton Drawing No. 1.595 contained in Planning Commission, File No. ST-3-70. Section 2. The City Engineer is hereby directed to amend the Official Street Map,'Engineer's Drawing No. ` 1.559 as set forth in said Exhibit "A" by Revision No. 2 Sheet No. 5, Section 18. APPROVED: 1 ATTEST: IMAYGR -- --- — — — - CITY CLERK PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 6, 1971 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 6, 1971 PUBLISHED: April 14, 1971 227 r.a i�{' y d -�.•3 ,y r3 .�,. n m-asra-�r�"�-+� - •-t- � -�ca ire ?- j r� 5�' _� � t�+t ,'�} - x� ��r '^ �+ � �� - - `i"" , � ^p?c_.s��� •�,�-� `s• � -�,- �` 9 ' -• •Yi i s �K}T� 4 ';i �rr + �' '`t� �t ; f.�§n44;.a�t1 �.. � .'. . . ,, ri r'..,. • r.�==m ..a�i r. ✓ 4. -le ! 9� i - it r �+ 'Misr - g ,'� i .:'� �... _. �^c;���+ p a_.3.+�• 1 �s+r"��...� (a�[t.�7°� o'� c .{.b��'�at� �3'�lc a S��f .:."S� ct• ilrl.�e�: :": .y�. ,.� ��»� d�s^`�.�z ):-•:.r`�7� .#,"a�. ;,' ��"'dmm?'��'�� � ",.�-�'._ .-"-ya+4 `�'-��.+. „•vr�, '�.�►,`yp r, ��-�c,�_,.- _ _ ..Zvi?�.Yr�h`':"r"�`tir.+.f'..J��trL's� �..�..:.....� �;..._,. Y;�.�;s�`.,�I,+�a�o�"_.w.�='�-�d�';.. .:,N""'jj�?L-.'.°y�; ...t��'.?0.4-.� ���:�`�a•,L_+ !J� � �'r''r \\ \ \ I l - Y � • l.i �' ! -fir - f-.. , -� � - � r At dotm _NUN,,.� - Z-11-1 Al >14 � � t �� 1;'\ IDS �ri to ,r _—e5 25 TU r5T• cod �, �+ •`�-� •) t �,�'.' �� u � � ,=r—� `.,-,�,, ®' s ERcl ,u A01. �• / 4• 201 ? \IOli7 D-ls (SO 24 -40 12 ,< � �4� ��, � -I_ � � � r� 7+'� ,-�"�-j='�� j �� �,J(, � _ _,�',;_/_A.`..---�1, •a� yr.-��—� I I_� , � � � , v C/I /�vv; � �[[{�p {yn�; n l� f��„``l i•-"i..J. � _ t..� L��)�- ����'r `, F S�-/lf..\. ����J' I� � 1,1 ,. ��1 •�• '�. f I •�i \. ../.— .1 � N `'W �� • ��i� 11fr LC��Ir LE 4 ... CITY OF EDMONDS 7.,. CARRY S.NAUGHTEN 250 - STH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (20G) 77I-3202 MAYOR -- COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation e Engineering DIRECTOR 1890 19C) March 7, 1990 Robert Watson Chambers Cable 533 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Right -of -Way Construction Permit Application F.18314 Olympic View Drive Aerial Cable Extension, A review of the subject application finds that the scope of the work indicated on the face of the permit is not in compliance with overhead wiring standards as described in Chapter 18.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. The issuance of the permit is therefore denied. A copy of this code section has been enclosed for your review. If you have any questions please contact John Bissell, Code Enforcement Officer, 771-3202. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator • 111Cur1)urc tt'd All.gwc [ 11. I "�o Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan RECEIVIED FEB 2 6 1990 ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ROUTING FORM CONTRACTOR / DATE PERMIT RECEIVED WORK ADDRESS LgN3/ � D (/ 0 SIZE OF CUT: X PUBLIC WORKS DATE SENT COMMENTS: REVIEWED BY BOBBY MILLS Va,:�P6 REVIEWED BY BILL STROUD REVIEWED BY ARCHIE BRENA FROM PUBLIC WORKS, ROUTE TO ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DATE SENT COMMENTS: REVIEWED BY NOEL MILLER 3-I- 90 ri4--,, REVIEWED BY DAN SMITH REVIEWED BY ROY WHITCUTT DATE PERMIT ISSUED Rev. 11/14/89 1fc R/WFORM/TXTRECEP PERMIT # .DECEIVED FEB 2 3 1990 PUBLIC WORKS Z 0 w V) O E- U GG O w CITY.OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT No Issue Date A. • Owner:y+Y` b CIM- Q-&bL-C_ B. • Contractor: Name Name 533 tnn�-�� S� Mailingg-,,Address Mailing Address L-VM%)gpS i W& City Sta e Zip City State Zip 7-7 sib State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: ' 3d� Chu AnP L v o ww 1�ti Type of Work to be Done: 6 l �4 �6�ftL C�tx� 0' 6� DAMPl(, v►cw 7R 01" E iSTIl Pu b p�trEs D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y �N F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: 3 9 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: Time Authorized: Void after 1 YEAFN days Special Conditions: RELEASED BY: Date PERMIT FEE: Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: INSPECTED BY NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Date Eng. Div. March 1989 ,, +CIT:�,bF_ EDMONDS .: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT No. Issue Date 1 A. • Owner: co k_r ontractor;'* B. • Contractor:'* Name � �j3 ih ArW S,f. Name 1 Mailing.Address w Mailing Address City Sta e Zip City State Zip 77 1 1 State License Number Telephone Number C.. • Address or Vicinity of Const uct'o : ` 3��- OL ,1MP 1,L V ►.Fw �(Z. � 1. Type of Work to be Done. Yp f ,1' °y MJ&per A IN2 OM Uisrw& Pu i, Pots D. • Work in Connection With: ,+ b,"-Sub�or'�'P' laid �/ � El Single Family El City Projects �' ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y VN F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY:. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from -any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FORA PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 . 1AN • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. 1 • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all tiTP }.1 • Traffic Control to be in accordanc rt i regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with'asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; 1 NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. 1 � Signature: Date: a3 lei C 1 Owner or Contractor Z O w a E- U C4 O w This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: PERMIT FEE: Time Authorized: Void after I YEAR days. Restoration Fee: Special Conditions: Receipt No.:_ Fund I I I Fee: _ Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY: Date INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NO S (Fund III - Route copy to Street Dept.) ` Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. Jul .>...r-Jam.-gi,A ,..,r.,..,ar+,�d.�,;...-"u;•;�.w°s"s;..iraM,.r+:r.1.fiw..�':rors..�;,,;,ri,36.Jw,�i^rs+adz;n.:=s.,�.m.-.•�.,�.;rati•.�✓, -"• �+w, +`-a..,a.��a.,;:+.tio.;n,.:•.5�:��..^„� WC R'- ITYgbF EDMONDS ti COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. • Owner: C'.�-� t' C"-�-'� Name S'S3 MArt ri 1,t' Mailing -Address 4S A a 10 City State Zip City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construct* 31� QL_ rAF14 VvgW Type of Work to be Done: "� LiAt- C-4L" 14 41;;4' TD S "C PS 314 `�" and o,o'3. n&1 EYastarr_ pub Per_Cc. ermit'No. Issue Date B. • Contractor: '° Name Mailing Address D. • Work in Connection With: %d ❑ Sub`',or`,,lat,/e� "� ❑Single Family El City Projects , . • ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y WN F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of -any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. 1 • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 1 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. 1 .0 Street to be kept clean "at all tirr}esa y �, c^a( • Traffic Control to be in accordant wvith City regulations. 1 • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. 1 I understand .the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. ,• Signature: Date: . e� A :3 1 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIALA-DIG Prior to Beginning Work y APPROVED BY: Z Time Authorized: Void after i YEAR days O w Special Conditions: F- U PERMIT FEE: Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: x =g RELEASED BY: Date INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. March 1989 . IS.OTH ST SW --- - 01 3708 - OOZ - U01-- O OO f- 2&0-Opt -00/- o 105- J, 19DOO vp'OP 10Z9- 3-/09-p I-002-OZD3 7yZZ la 7118 02 03 2708-001-001-D204 � z 3768-001-001-0303 (18030) 78OG 376Y-002-001 0003 10011 Isozs19L)Z.9 I.-, �', �0� 3709- 00Z-UO3- O OD Z 03 Q OZ o 180z15 � 3760-001-004-0701 IblUS 16103 13107A 181076 11 I\ 4 I> S I 3708-00 2--D04 -0061 > 02 03 01 JV 04 ; 37D6 -001-ODS-0101 ISI19 18111 18111 O U I 5 189LS 18919 7913 I 3708 -002- D05-0000 4 7 1 1r I_ _ t IBZ N" PL SW o v 74t1 7Z94 EEkNIEW FIRS I I � 1£9zo3 I I to v I 7914 3703- 00 Z- OD(o- DUOq 78 t2. \ 7917 181 -- — 18Z13 \7816 If 7 M Nl N 3708 - OOZ - UO 7- 0008 I 7909 1q__- I 7 0 Q � 182L7 If 7810 �1 I N ' 200 O -4 t N 3708- 00 Z - 008 - 0007 0 -Tv ONLY jI > 1 2- t8 3 LS n 184 !E�e(W;Eb &A Qom 4 P;.k& 0, -ex►S-laz �� MP L'y `s •Tb 7NkA S .TH P.0 ISDTH ST SW I hT 28(o' OI 1 TM-D - TM-U2o3 3�o 'zb/ I - 1802 9 ,79LZ ��� 1 7718 02 03 2.708-On/-Ml-0204 3708-001-001-03D3 C803U) 780fo 19011 1 T-7 18025U29 1, ,Zk 181US0103 18107A 181076 W S OZ 03 1 37DLS-001-005-0101 Z 18119 18111 ISM 3 184LS 18914 7913 4 18Z PL SW 7Z94 SE, -VIEW FIRS 7 79L1 laZ03 11 10 y 18Z13 ML7 183Us 13 183LS 184TH ST S\\/ I 3708-OOZ - 001- 000 f- 1800v --- - ---- \376T Z-007-ODZ `LITo-_ 33708- 00Z-003- 0 00 Z 1SU Z.8 7414 78 Z7. 7917 I '\ ,1 �0 1 4 1 1 4 1 3708-00 Z-004 -0001 a 1 , O 3 � I 5 I 3708-OOZ-005'-0000 > I D I � I 370/1 - 00 Z- 60(0- 0009 --- I M TT vi j 3788 - OOZ - 607- 0 013 8 7909 7 I'1 7B 10 1200 o � N 3708-00z-008-0007 n 18�-- V e TP ONLY �I > 9 Is 31a � Q t �tl IU � - 4�541 " S/_Q . RIM, F_,L - Z65 ........ k7i- �VlkLV,45 .......... I E OUT- IZ(o . . ................. rr .......... .............. ... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . ........... FIaE HN(PRANIT A,50EM�5LY 11 _rATFVALVE 0( COVER 21 -611 FRAME OUTLET ----- PIPE - ADJUSTMENT ° 0 16" MAX, ' 4"' MIN a 24" DIA , B �' z _ U ' � _ ---------- PLAN2' - 1 W' x2' -5 %4" x4 V2" z �, FIN GRADE o STEP FRAME W/GRATING w E- U PRECAST EXTENSION a V) 4811 OR 72 AS RE OD > 4" —PIPE INLI=T TYP _ _ Z--------- 21-O�' PIPE OUTLET r I m— O I L WATER TY P F�ow - _ = SEPARATOR ® I I I C9 TEE ONLY V = CONSiRUGT, IN L _ WHERE INDICATED m ,r, FIELD GHAN NEL ON PLAN MATCH ' _� i � SHELF TO ELBOW 0 TO °6 a Z C EXIT PIPE = a CROWN OF THE F F cfl SECTION B- B NOTE: CATCH BASIN, FRAME GRATE \ SHALL CONFORM TO ES NOTE: MANHOLE, FRAME COVER SHALL CONFORM GRAVEL BAOKFILL STD PLANS B- Ib � B-2a TO WSDOT STD PLAN B-23a I FOR TYPE 1 FDIC PIPE gEDDING. RESPECTIVELY, SOLID COVED TO 8E 5-2, 4 23C FOR TYPE S . (011 MIN COMPACTED DEPTH TYP CATCH BASIN TYPE 1P. TYP SANITARY SEWER/- NO SCALE ,ANHOLE t � STORM DRAI N TYPE 1 4.8" DIA & TYPE 3 72" DIA NO SCALE METER BOX, NO 2 FOG TITS OR BROOKS NO 65, WITH STEEL TRAFFEC COVER HINGED INSPECTION LID METER (FURNISHED BY CITY OF ED- STANDARD CAST-IRON VALVE MONDS WATER DISTRICT) BOX (1011x3011) - o 8" ' L__ J BRICK AS REOD -� J L FURNISH * INSTALL P -3" WIDE BLUE METALLIC MARKER TAPE .0 <. 2' OVER SERVICE LINE �' I z 2" BRASS COUPLING MIPT x CCMP 2" SERVICE TUBE, PLASTIC, NSF APPROVED, I&O P61 WWP GATED rn / OR 2" TYPE K COPPER / 2" BRASS 6" PVC �� NIPPLE 11/2" x 2" COR P STOP, BALL TYPE —' PIPE OVER BRASS BODY, /-\WV\/H x COMP �� ""�� BY-PASS MAIN NIPPLE VALVE 2" -ISO# ZRONZE GATE BRASS SWING x �` VALVE 4 OPERAT►NG HAND WHEEL JOINT j 2" METER SERVICE INSTALLATION NO SCALE PLAN @ BENDS PLAN @ TEES 18" MIN @� 8 " 0 PIPE Q5° m IE _ ,d m a a a, a N T I SECTION @ BENDS ' & TEES PIPE SIZE 901 BEND 45° BEND 22�? BEND TEES A B A B A B A B 611 � 811 2011 1511 1511 1211 1211 1211 20„ 1511 NOTES: I, BEARING AREAS ARE BASED ON 225 PSI TEST PRESSURE AND A SOIL RESISTANCE OF 2000 PSF. IF WEAK (LESS THAN 2000 PSF RESISTANCE) SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCREASE THE BEARING AREAS SHOWN TO PREVENT MOVEMENT UNDER TEST OR OPERATING PRESSURES, CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE f'C = 3000 PSI. CAST ALL THRUST BLOCK AGAINST FIRM -UNDISTURBED SOIL. 2. CONCRETE BLOCKING SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE AND HAVE A MIN OF V4 SQUARE FOOT BEARING AGAINST THE FITTING. S. INFORMATION APPLIES TO PIPE (ol' � � LARGER, THRUST BLOCKS FOR WATER MAINS NO SCALE ir w 0 u z 0 M METER SETTER, 2" FORD VBH77-12B WITH METER SPACER (LENGTH DETERMINED BY DISTRICT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION) 2" CAP 21Ixl2" BRASS NIPPLE 2" BRASS 900 EL *USE CL160 PVC SDR 3406 CTS. ADD FORD 2" MALE ADAPTERS, PACK JOINT (OR MUELLER 110 COMPRESSION) COUPLINGS, COMPLETE WITH INSERT SLEEVE (TYP 2 EACH) . FILTER FABRIC STAPLES OR 2"x2"x14GA WELDED WIRE RINGS (TYP) WIRE FABRIC I I I it 11 I1 II 11 `" 11 0 II .� II II rn II 11 II ------ ---- - 00ta II 11 -I I- jTT l , II II II II N li Li Li BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN 8"x811 TRENCH ELEVATION 2x4 @ 4'-0" OC SILTATION FENCE NO SCALE I/4" RAKE PER FT FROM GROUND LEVEL MUELLER CENTURION 200 OR M H DRESSER RELIANT 929 D COMPRESSION TYPE 5 V4" MVO (OR APPROVED EQUAL) FILL PIPE POST WITH f' C = 3,000 PSI CONC N FIN GRADE 8" 0 SCHED 40 GALV STEEL PIPE POST ox STANDARD CAST - IRON o PAINT TRAFFIC YELLOW 36"x36"x8" VALVE BOX ' CONC COLLAR 'MEGALUG' (RICH 940B) - MJ RESTRAINT = • 6" FLxMJ RW GV 01p° °� TJEH • ° O ' — O O o •° .. 6" 0 CL 52 - 1 I d = CONC FTG • O p a O • ° `'° ° EXIST MAIN CONC THRUST MIN I CU YD I" TO 3" WASHED 4-1 �-�i" D I A BLOCK (POURED GRAVEL. COVER W/ VISOUEEN IN PLACE) PRIOR TO BACKFILLING 1811x1811x4" CONC BLOCK GUARD POST DETAIL NOTES: No SCALE 1. AFTER INSTALLATION HYDRANT SHALL BE WIRE BRUSHED, PRIMED WITH CHLORO-CHEM PRIMER � FIELD PAINTED WITH 2 COATS OF "STEELCOTE FEDERAL YELLOW". 2. WHEN HYDRANT SPOOL EXCEEDS 18' USE FULL CIRCLE MJ REPAIR SLEEVE WITH 'MEGALUGS'. 3. HYDRANTS SHALL BE BREAK -AWAY TYPE IN WHICH VALVE WILL REMAIN CLOSED IF BARREL IS BROKEN. 4. GUARD POSTS REQUIRED AT ALL HYDRANTS SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC INTERFERENCE. SEE 'HYDRANT GUARD POST DETAIL' FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY NO SCALE 4-- 3/" 1) u 7% HIGH AS INDICATED PLAN I� 1011 911 8'i4' 1 A PIPE SPEC INS 15110 CAST I RON FRAME � COVER IE PL1% , ",.. TYP CLEANOUT NO SCALE u V) 0<w z BASE CLASS B OIL CLASS E v AC WEARING COURSE AC BASE PER WS D OT = GLASS 5 = t- milli N f i IE 10 C; l CD CRUSHED ROCK BASE co COMPACT TO 95 % REPLACE ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IN SUBGRADE PROOF ROLL SUBGRADE TO 95 % MAX DENSITY NO SCALE L OT PAVEMENT 21 -011 SO CONC PAD (UNREINFORCED) 8"0 PIPE (MIN) FIBER JOINT PACKING 45° ELL DIAMETER PER PLAN PLUG SHALL BE SCREW IN TYPE IN HUB PIPE CONTINUES AT SOME LOCATIONS r—mA&or i- nn\firr1 STATE PROVED DOUB CHECK ASSY ww TER TIGHT GROUT NLET � OUTLET PIPE 2" FLANGED GATE VALVE F S OF . POUBLE CHICK ASSY 2" DRAIN LINE TO CB#3 SLOPE TO DRAIN PVC SCH E? 40 STANDARD 48 4 PRECAST VALVE CHAMBER JU5TABLE PIPE S NCHIONS rK LVT Architecture 400 Doyle Building A Professional Interiors 119 Pine Street Service Urban Design Sea de, WA 98141.1511 Corporation Pl;on� rye/:2(LIG.�i24rt8154 Fax: � 624.0541 AJ\OERSEN z M z a BJORNSTAD a o KANE JACOBS, INC o � z w CONIIIULTINO NI IGINNNR 8 z Z LLJ Ot) c� cn _ . 0 ct C] tS7 w 1m E} a 0 I L _j I LL L l W O IY z o 1_ u. LJ w c~a i v z Q I 3 Q I cn W Q, T J ixi � , �c, 0-) >rnV) z�o - I n W I n c+ I Lu M� � W f-- d w. z� z . V) � � i LiJ a. a r� -----I IT � W z� i v I I a z n u z w IU. a. a. a w to z o cn O_ f.K LLj (n o �z » UNITED STATES POSTAL PERR I NV I LLE CARRIER FACILITY 9802E-9998 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON DRAWN BY: VCA CHECKED BY: D KO APPROVED BY: TAK "Vv' . . T PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. 9022.000 SHEET DATE OF , -C=2" F V _I - FfN GRADE —TD W7 - �� 2.714. eO' :: - - . P ER 50 'i"Q � B M # _ NOTE EL �,Ca� C3Q 0R EL 2Ca4 S• tC�-,� I . U©N . ALL - RIP RAP . QUAF RY. SPALLS #G .(0 l2,VEI;T ti 1 SHALL C� �C)A FOR WALL- NF - 3 ��n, - A .STD 5 E•C .5 C,. � _ a� TEE wDo-r/A�w 4 ra3,12,NQZ i �i►�� � . / It .' r SHALL BE . FEASUi`ABL"Y ..1TEIr.L . Gi;ADED" i . L k. I W/ ROCK: ­GRADATION - AS ' FOLLOWS :; ' - _. 12T©p - = STO MED STONE SIZE,", t t l�!i I M 'Ni(�I STd _ E 5 I0TTa M ICE a i E I - I . I s 1" �. i''.1 - i . I . 1; ;: I I t � 1'� , I I � � - � I .1 � � .. - I, ; - j-.. ..-� I �-, ------I- • --- I .. ___ I --- .. I - -t 1. - _ _ `, - - - t, } -.. - - - - - - . -�� - �+L7 -' - - - - - - - - +-% LII . I-L .-I � I I I I- I 1��I-I III �ZI .J�U--\I,I II \.� .I ,-� V. I II 1EP -SLAB ON GI2 - , th City. of 5 x + 1 All work and materials shall be in accordance wi REItiIF tNf G�' #8 t✓W .: I , - r� $«, - Edmonds, Snohomish County Standards .and' Specifications and . shig ortat 2-#5 G©NT T `F' tea ton :.Sta aepartmet . of '!`ransp icon 195# standard , � C'/2 �� I I R}S - . -1"OP bF 5pec� f�:cations for road, bridge and municipal construction -and / F-�AC, PAV I � & I I N Cad. - The 198, : t�7T � #ydraul ics a nu l--. � - c cx PAVE E T . 0 � � � LOAD i NG � I � � � I sr"� � � 2: - It shall be the contractor's responsibility, to obtain all con- �t .. • --,:.. Cif LA8 Q L2 Rfifl 1 US ." r�#I _t - . I D � - 4� - - , .t. : ' - 611 - - struction easements -necessary before, initiating off -site work - - 4 ' i . -way a within the road rights -of ra. CDt�f G WA-- it w _ ,; -, - = l l to n �, b�c - PAVING ►.. _ 3. All utility trenches and structural fills shall be baclfilled •; , .__ , • REl I-1 F 'ETZ C-� tom.# n crx,­..I- .-44 � I. N,I I4�..�-. 4�I - I ,. I IIII -I .;- �I 1,-,iikLI--� I /I � / '% NOTF- ; =i : '-a_..:: +p : -.: ancc patted to a minimum caf 9S Maximum density by € dified NCn'ES ON 5-1 = ,d < t,- , ,pi . • 0'., -: ---_ __1 , . I- IluI ll �11.I I I . , -% 1 P1=C7f�M ..� �,. ___ . proctor test- - . ♦ q as ' ' ,<A. ii • • ♦. t Z _ I= 'ivi5 Vh SL I . c . �� .� ib �t< _ a y ., 1 MAY I✓3E USED. FOI�MfNG -1 Y I II- I I '" _ r a. o 0 4 . The Contractor shall be res onsible for prove providing ode ate . . ' �S . ab - - c t�1iE' DD XJ S SNALL �0�,06 EDGE OF P _# _ _ (H E ��a� saf ards,`safety devices, protectzve:+egipment, €loggers, - PAVEMEN T 2 5 GaNT 1 ' • , _ ,_ I (-` ( II to it - r-Oo I FOFZM TD SECTION Q - -- _ - - _ . *A . • , and any other needed actions to protect the life, health and . _ -- _ � I I I 1 it ! II II111 14 _ �(I�.I . 1�. I 1--�:N-1.N1 .-� % 1�. ,� I : '�..'. . I-I�. I I I I I.� I - � � LI 11 ,,,I - , -1-, 1I .�I­.,- F-. ­1-1 I -­ '�I". ,� 3I ­C-­O,N. , -I. ..'AI' I" . . 11 II ...III g1► f S - Gt4.3 OF STATE safety of the ' public, and to protect property in cennectien. ' _-. I STANiJAZt) 5i::'r with the performance of ;work covered by the contractor; . Any 1'1 (- I ( - AT GONG t�J VE, ADt) work within- . the traveled. right-of-way . that " may ,interrupt ,� #5 x I' -di` bbi'VEL; '" 318" ASPN PELT EXJ normaltrafic flow shall require at least oneflagger :for. ; 2 O @ 24'' OG @ FADE OF GUR.B- each lane. oftraffic affected•'All sections of the WSDc�T Stan .. lard specifications:1-07.23�-,Triffic-Contro1,-s all,,apply•- - .. . -.,�z �. - ... _ ,._ _- - - ... ,,. _ _ ... - .. •..r• -. - r_ .-. .. - _ . 1a. ws -_ - ...:_ PV". .5. All manholes area drains inlets and catch basins outside of _� , r , ,. . ;. �> v_4 na e st ctures ublic<r w shall have locknglds.,All drag g ru ('� t F, P / C A, ... _ : R [GSAR-,LLE R DEC1► CC � _� .: A :P _ CADIi3 D CURB CCIC CURBT l.1 _ f . I (. "i .. : � .. -. _ ._ ...:: _ .. , _ . - ..., _ . �.= associated with a permanent retention,/detent ` on facility shall ND SCALE NO SCALF Nv �:.��� �v __ALE 0.56,*Z- have solid locking lids. . ' /111.1 � :...- •I.11 . -- sewe e ,., - _ , - 6 �. - P Sanitary r `pe shall be PVC grvty'�ew r pipe as per the" at tons.- _ e ' C io � Ci.fl I ­1 I .� � . I-, I .I . �''CI �:I I""�. , ! '-�I' -- , ­.IU T(I.� .:114­ I1 � .L­ I-­'1S-- -�-I P ; ��AI _ 7 All sterna, sewer "pipe under- paved areas shall be as shown; PVC, C-76 nor corrugated metal CMP -CgMP to be alvanized ASTM -.- _._ . . NO SGAL E concrete CP 24 diameter and lar er to be' reinforced r } . g } g steel x with treatment 1 asphalt, coating or better, nor corrugated SEE PLI�N C _ aluminum pipe, or AAS� M274-7: t aluminized steel. P 7C ..pipe TAKff:AL_ES j O 1.ifAlNTA1N SIZE LOGATIDi�! conforming to the specifications is permissible in other then - 1T1t7t�1 A2 REG�vIr2�i7 OF­ 8L_iDC ; ` paved areas. Ali. pil shall have rubber gaskets. No PVCI pipe , is to be used inside county _right-o€-- talc-. l­', � ,I II I I I I /".. , 111. I II - , 1 -I -. -)---- ,I --- -�--1�:- <0 - 0-/ I 1-- //,--�, (--i --�--/ �1 /-----"0II �- IC-C:,)i- ,MMIrFP I-- ­ JI -19� . I I I1 I- � I I I IT, I It . 1­-1 //-. / � L, N OL I II -I I. 5f ,AYtI EA ►. l . A � 8 . Provide t rack rip rap as shown at all discharge pointsof II pipes R�QL+ i �E1 into earthen sections. (,\wJj! t e . I- II - ... V ; 2GG . '. I // I01- 011 9. .Provide screens as shoes at all pipes -12" 0 I or ;larger with " � - 5T R U CT FILL exposed ends - e II I''/ d o �� Ic _ MSC L r ! ` ' , ��1 - lfl . Miter all pipe outlets and inlets to Conform with , adjacent 1 l } 1_ li i ►I .{ {}'/, �• ✓r� �� ry " %% 1 3t . ", earth slo es. . . - . `� 1 �� 2 3 -- 3 0 2 -9 �, !r� / � f EL _ - . � 4 AS SH W N SUgf� � P ' /A !(. (?r -1+:. f - � I" " I ELEVi�TION PLAi�! . 11. - deIjma i g (y } , Provi nufactureci fi tt n s Wes, Tees .and Fiends at :all' la GMT' / �� ,t,�,� � - ��._- , .j I y pipe _connects" fc?r sanitary sewer- pipes, rain leaders,- storm -,t t ; �� �� 2%2 _ _ drain pipes and.faundatian drain pipes. 1i - 27© ' 1-1 TOS EL D _ - - --- _ I I _ . 12. Foundation drain pipe shall be Fvc as per the sped€ications " a , i ,. 2G8 w tht tightline at1% min. sly fry the,.footing to tip ` t 6 / `. 4 (j , . , I i / ( ;< rge fit? - t �� .<.'# - int... _ .... _ -- - .. ..__ o_ _ --- -I -IT �; 1 i - ,.VAULT _ - EL t"- 1 Q O -t I f i . C} _ _ - El_ a'_ I. " _ . ! 1i 4 `Nr, ` ' 4 _ ' 11 EX (ST 48' ° + JL/� I a _ 1 I ca�� OUT FALL � We EL O'- I�" -= I�MOVF- PDRTION 4g" CONC �'-©a 41_�11 EXIST t�Pi;- df�oUT FILL TOP OF SLAB, S L OPE NOT ES : "DUTF.L AL I- 6;7-O,J7 THI NESS VARIES, SLOf'c.-T OU7FFAi I I - 2. r-IELD GUT E.�,1---- T P!FE:0 TO SUIT_ 31 Tar of SLAB To MATCH F-xIST NORTH 48l1 4t, I E - , L � L �+{{�� AULT. PLAIII 1/411 -_ I f - O' - --' .. AD J U ST M E N E GT 10W1 (LEVELING 5R I CK S OR, C7ftA RINGS - CF7101,4AL: PAV E ICI E NT SU R FA Q z � I 5 cc I 11, ., ./ - 70 aE'5E'A`r ED : A . ___ I'-o'' MI IJ F F-r- E�aA.� "I 11 4,Sit ,�> OPN C:V L- - - - - II -,__ . - 11 �SECTICJI A' A T aNS -- -.- . i P C RISER SEC 1 l . I - GeGEWJ415 . _ 12 MIN � >- - •8 galvanized deformed rebar VALI LT GOV ER TO "' OE eITHF-K CIF' - OR F'/G riaai©Hai,© .. 3-0 - 12" MtN 1 12" MIN n # G1X "4 62 G, O.F � � ��, z - YP ALL AiZOUNID - - I I. -T T ER _ (HOR GIF C.O-JG) -- B A - A PVc wATERSTa �. :. T1f t i �3 F3 4 F' , PROVIDE 2-40 5 CTR, ETEN I) 2 1- 111 BEYOND OPNGS, i 3 PL YP CS - MORTAR , TYP ALL PIPES EX15T 48" OUTLET PIPE.,. .. S LC IFF- ..Ta _ I 11 OV.TL.ET- i.,Ji 1'r !Nh 20 .._.. � 1 tr y v - - ' 1: 5T 12AW fE�A L. C S / o F� E SEAT F::D -` PLACE 1 LAY E K 0! • FILi'EP\ FA�IFIf 4N1:� . �ECUK E V�� AL ST K�S SECTION �A-�A= 1 E� O I ' -1CONTROL., � -� ,� ��,*�!*-:11­11 BALE CHEC DA �._ NO SCALE - - -.. . e I cYOND OPN& 12IN�f, 4 GOVER I _: SEE PLAt,,I FOR EL_ I I 0 HAND H OLD , SEE . 5 E CT 8 -- g P/C Colt c --�.` - �r _� - - - i IIm - s, :'.:. i>%� _. - _._ . ,ti,. J, - I� _., M I�I� IM - - o - -- _ ., �. YiIi WWI TOP � 13f6E OF WALL �' -WALL LL IZ E I N F _ S @ 12 H V, E F � (FROVIDE 4� 5 if, 12 ,tIORIZ - . CORNEO, R SARS TYP,F) I ,. �►iR " V-0 Z - # BY, -Z 1 TO 1.- . . MATG•H VETS '7 galvanized 7�smooth steel ;, 1f �a`" censer to center 262 ,� y A - I� F{t om.. I 2 `-III ALL O" cvi I N ,� �r ,. 1 !(� , ( .:_ ,. .�- �it.4= ;� 258 14 . Se theII :�ani�1 and mite t ral .ply fog .act io at * I s AREAS II40 :, I UNbEF- St�-� ' `�j i,r and + e lls fear cn coons of ra .n readers oundati h-drains. III 256 UI�IDEf2 &�C^ '� �' 1' l and .saristary sewer services. �' EXIST GRADE klC, \. 254 t Iv fE1z0E-Ze >/';: f ; .- - / 252 0-=Tf : i H OF UNSUITASLt- �-,/ 15. Storm water retention/detention facilities must %e flushed and �'�, f : , MAT I~• EXGAVATI C?N, \ cleaned prior to o�pce _ 250 r/1 �� ASSUMEr0 AS SASIS . 248 - /� r`':� ,��v FOR LUMP SUM t31P- ; . ' Temporary Gravelanstructien� Entrance . a k , V t:, -y ; (GONTF Av C,7 LI C� 24 0 � � ' - r 1. The construction entrance shall be made out of quarry spalls, 24 I U C ! -f OF F IG�i2 MAC' AUJUST i0. 4 to 8 inches in sire. DEFTOF EX6AVATION MI To SUIT FI E Ltd M I eJ 2. The area of the entrance should be cleared of all vegetation, 60NJ0I T►ON S,) roots atzd ether objectionable material. Any drainage facili- .ties r.-,gtired because -of, washing 'should be constructed . according to specification. If wash racks are used, ,they should ;be installed according to manufacturer's specifica- NdT E - bons . 1. I, ALL EXGAVATEp SLOPES TO 15E IN AG6012t-,AWCE W/ V`v/Au`7II-+(�:7D1,! ' 3. If conditions on the site are such that most of the mud is not -11 STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. � INDUSTF,Y S vAFETY STANDAT�.D5, 20& -(55 -- reutoved from vehicle tires bar contact with the gravel, then- ,:i W. - the tires must be washed before vehicles enter,a public read. - Wash water must be carried away from the entrance to a . settli .- area to remove sediment. A wash rack may also be used . to make washing .more convenient and effective. - 4. The entrance shall be Maintained in a condition: which will- - - prevent tracking of mud onto public right-of-way. This may . require periodic top dressing of aggregate, as conditions demand. All materials spilled, dropped, washed or tracked from . . I I ve ides o h ont roadwa or into storm drains must t e Quad �f be r m QQ TYP CART -1 E* TI I I , ­­­. ----I ­.­1I 11i­,I ­11.-.-O----. ­­"­­'- I,'TH U:,. ITE L.� � I--.,,` ,-- ---- I­-''� -I ­1� ,­� ­ d " ­� " "1­.O1 ­, O11-­- -­­� N. ­.G. ­. . ­ I -I" -I 1. ..lRTH� —� -I 1. ­.­ - ­ ­ I I ­ - immediately. NO SCALE Flow control Structure & Sediment Fond 'Kaintenance - I. Inspect the berm, of the pond regularly to insure that it is:' . _- - _ _ structurally sound and has not been damaged by'construction Manholes, " equipment or erosion. ' . 1..1, Manholes .to be constructed in accordance with AASHTO M--199" 2: -..The ss Ration � in should be checked-afterI-each runoff } P ra►puat the entrance i e of the Flow Control Stru sediment %Z' ASTM C 478 unless otherwzse shown on ions. t o c g nfall for sediment cleanout. Check the I 1- II P P cturc for. . 2. Handholds in adjust ant section shall have`3" minimum clear- excessive build up of sediment. When sediment reaches the ante. Steps in ma le shall have 6 minimum clearance. cleanout level, it shallI. be.removed and properly:disposed of.II % I/. 7. This applies to all ,sediment traps. 1.1 . 3. All reinforced ast in place concrete shall be Class A, Non- . * Nominal dimensions ? reinforced eo crate in channel and shelf shall be Class C. AlI Erosion Control I ­1 .� . precast concrete shall, be Class AX. - . 1. To insure that sediment -laden water does not change the water 4. Precast bases shall be furnished with cutouts or knockouts. quality of the receiving drainage system, sedimentation.and,. I II Knockouts shall. ha' a wail thickness of 2" minimum. erosion control facilities must- be in operation, prior to. RAMP TEXTURE.DETAIL construction.. Satisfactory condition and. maintenance of these 5. Manhole rings and.covers shall be in accordance with WSDOT'facilit es is the responsibility Hof the contractor. Standard Specifications.and meet the strength requirements of Federal --Specification .RR-F-621D. Mating surfaces shall be 2. Because site conditions cahonly be estimated,' hi'Eroson_:; finished.to assure,nonking,fit:with any cover position., Control measures contains the minimum requcements. To.1ensure . complete erosion coiztrol, tne.contractor should,expect. that 6. -.All base reinforcing -'steel �shall have �a �minimum,yield, strength � � , � More control- facilities trill be �n�:eded � as . =construction_ . of 60,000 psi.and.be placed in the upper half of the base with progresses and.une pected conditions arise. - 1" minimum clearance. 3. Stabilize all areas stripped of vegetation, cahen work in that P k 7. Manhole step legs shall be parallel or approximately radial at area,is not expected to proceed for 30 days, by mulching, RAM T E T UR E • rass lanai n or other a roved erosion control treatment. the option�Qf the manufacturer, except that all steps in any g P g. PP ( SEE OF-7 4 N Or'E) manhole shall be -similar. Penetrat on of outer wall by a leg Grass: seeding al©ne is acceptable during, April through i:s prohibited. September.,Outside of this"time period, it must`be augmented 3/0It EXJ r: by mulching, netting, or other approved -treatment. Temporary . seed ng.will be applied according ,to the Landscape plans or Catch Basins - the following application: . 1 Catch Basins to be.constructed_An accordance with ASTM C 478 . to IZ. P SEED ' ii droseed or sow seed with '7tI% ry �1 :(AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890 unless otherwise shown on ions or - Y perennial e_ noted: in .the Standard,Specifications. and 301 fine .fescue with a, minimum of 3_ cu.iti, . - . - _ .- vacs. , 3 TYP . 2. As _an acceptable alternate to.rebar,•welded wire fabric having � � -. ­. ­.- 1\I9�I- I ,.$ ­� ,I I. �. . -I . - -I ,I -I � I -I ,� � . I -1. . . �-I -. 1I I II 1 I I. ,1 II� 5 ra CARRIER RAMP SEED PATE 8#/l000 square feet .minimum sow a minimum- area of.. 4.12 square inches per foot may be used. . ,,,.. 1­ , . , Welded wire fabric shall comply to. ASTM A- 497.. (AASHTO M221j 1 . V211 MAX PERT CHANGE . not be laced in the cutouts. FERTILIZER` 112 '.with 3Q� . of mix as 38 UREA :fcirmaldehyde Wire fabric shall P - :a lied at 5 1pp©. are , s �XTF IIDEIJ.: --URB (E)EVEL WH�RF pp #� qu feet prior to seed pbSS ISLE ) -3. The bottom of Mize precast base section may be rounded. . SIDEWALK- - a ..',be on all 4 sides wath- maximum diameter. of -14't, ' Thy: permanent .ve etation as `indicated "on the Landscape Plans, 4. Cutouts m ay ., -,be ft �r will:be a t ` Cutouts�ma -be either round�or .D shape.,Pipe to be 'installed PP zed nedi, ely.following fin sh. grading._,A11.- �- 1, .. areas :to be seeded shall. bFe cultiv ' b di.scin rakin I in _factory supplied cutouts. �� I-, harrowin or `ot a g.. gI ' i l0 3 ,, : -. g, h r acceptable means to the 'sat sfact ion. ,of -�. _ -. - - . - _ • - - . • ,_ -: _ - _ _- _ - _ - � � _ _ -� #-Ttss - 1 ::%nAcr*a rica aexr4% i !» e.4- , ., - . - -��������� (,) I i Jt--SCALE ` y �€l+ Sea�l41.15llrvilce , .. Phone: 2&624.8154 Csrrporat - -, Far 20"24.4541 Z M Zin CJ . B�.ltRiISTAD a 4 K � a a= :� - .JA► BsO INIC o CO - Z W 4, - con��ue.•cIir� �vai ® C3 Z t zEli . - _ V) ��� W cW Q Z. :a: . _ 0 . tr1 _ �: 11 10 4 . - o 1 N.. W I I >- 1 I U J I ~. �--. LL U U- _ 11, r)'_ II LIJ w r © 1 . t/� W V- c.7 " I U .SY Z,- . 1--. . 1 _I :�> U = Q tZ w <t 1 [-- J� Y I 6 . 0ZIn V7 - d- �-, D Z rr (v o I . �--i rr 0 M (.) �WaO0 a_MW W - - .Q U a ," - : ,� I I I- w' -a w o a. 0 Z -J ...:. 3t t � .CX' � .-, V) i � a �: - W a a n I� , - W I- \ , . I--- -:iI , r--. W I cn 1 ' � . - I .• 10 \ ,t L o w �. w 1= I o Z � L Z 1. --_-t 1 � 13 W o: a (. , Q o. 41 V . in - Q a - a _. wD1 ^ X o tL- Q I I . _fir,. u�.+ U/ , > it l - , r:.. ..l .: � : _ _ . t X .. ♦ram Z. .. .,_ _ t _ .-.. _ - ,. i } f ` t r ` ,v -„ - -.� ` t mmm=- - .. -, .. A �. i - ..."..r - is 5 t—O if .09 '5AWCUT EXI`2T 1, 12 st-OPE MAX, MIN f�AMIO, 7YP t-VINL, 'DIV VVALN IN t:: YV f-/AV r- IVI M N I r­:�Nv r: IVI r- 1-4 1 5AG K, OF' GUTTER Architecture 400 Doyle Building -A-, Professional S1 DEWAL K, Interiors 119 Pine Street Service DRIVeWAY EL T,SO 71 Urban Design Seattle, WA 98101-1511 Corporation I" RAD eIDEWALK IDEWALK Phone: 206.624.8154 SLOP= I" I�ATTER FLUeH Fax: 206.694.0541 0-020FT I 9AE) -'BLO P E -TY f= Y4 SLO r 5 0,057FT Ln 0.02/FT -;UTTE9 CARRIED N7 4 A !`�RECA5T- 15LK 7 F_ THRU INTER5ECTION zAarm ANdL -PLAN 0 SJORMSTAO c> 0z _EL 69,17 JN 0 C::) ro _'Z"ACr FAVT MIRAGRID 5T 'KAIWE 0 0 GIEOC_If�l D_EYTEND JAC 136j, IPJCU -IMING ENGINEEPS 00 0 fz"AC5C; LEVeLINGi FIN EIRADE TO- FPOtQT OF F�L< CONSUL 00 z z CID U tP\6 E 0 e,20 WEST HA14R(SON, R SEATTLE. WA. 98119 C2063' 285 -1195: z 411AI64(� 15ASE.C.OUIZ5E __24 z w a . . ..... Q�AWDULAR. 5ASE �SECTION A -A ............. ........... ........ .. ... _W1 SECTION 76TH AVE .......... .......... TION TYF .. ............. 18" TRANS I ;;�A Le�, 150ME7`f;�IC VIEW '�51DEEWALK kRmp ........... ... .... ....... .. ........ > WIDE 51DEWALK) . ..... .... K." . . ......... .. ..... .......... . bj ....... .... J, &ICE M110. N N . . ...... . ... N ne-, ...... .... ... . . . ....... z EiqTRA.. U < PRECAST BLOCK RETA I RIG WALL DRIVEWAY + . ....... ... Na Lj LL. X 3 EW-- A-65,PHALT N . ... . ........ 2 .... .. ...... ..... ..... PAVEMENT P, ... . 0 LL, .... . .. ... ..... ry z . . ..... ... ry ..... . ........ .... ...... .. .... ... .. ......... L ............ . . . ........ .... . .. . ............ . ...... . 11105" . ... .............. ..... ..... _U ........... < 0 < V) ........ ...... ... ..... .. .. ... . ... . ....... .... . ... .. . ....... 4.7 .1 ­­ ...... w .. ­­ I...., ... . ...... r Z. '�;V U . . ......... ...... .......... ... . ....... .... .. ........ . ....... ......... .. .... . . .. ... . .... ........... . ...... . ...... . ..... . ........ . ...... ..... .... . ..... ...... . ..... . ..... co ........ . ...... > . .. . ........ .......... . ......... . ...... . ..... ........ ..... . . . . . . . . ........ . ...... ........ ry. .. . .... . ... ....... . ...... .. . ......... . ........ _j ...... ...... UJI .. . . ..... ..... .. . . ... .. ........ . ... ... �N ............ .......... .. . ..... . ........... . .. . . ......... ... I .. ..... ... .. . ...... .......... ...... .. ......... .... .. .... ...... ..... ... . ... . . . . ....... . ..... .. . ....... ... ..... .... ..... .... .... .. ---------- .. ... ...... ........ ......... . ... ... z Z - - - -------- . ........ ...... . ... .. .. ...... ... ... . .......... . ry 0:2 "W 00 n' ............................ J) ...... ...... m _T ANC _E T . ... . . ........ .... ..... ..... z . ..... . . .. . .............. . ..... . .... . . ....... CON.r,, U . ....... . ........ . ..... ... . . ..... - - ----- - --- DRIVEWAY V) n o t CONC 0 9 ....... ....... ............................................ ................ ..... ....... .. .......... .... ............ ... ........... ........... . ........ ...... - ---- - 0) UJ NEW A5�PH, 77 ..... ..... ........................... ............. .............................................................. ......................... .......... Z 15 07Y P T_ . ..... . ..... —CJ)7YP .. .. .. ...... . ... ... . ..... ..... ...... ...... ....... ..... 51' CONC DRIVE < ...... ...... . .. .... z ..... ...... ......... ........ ..... 0 ... ...... .. ... . ........ . ....... F . . ...... ...... '0 ...... ..... ...... .... 107 OF . ........ . ... .... ... Lij 5CONC, DRIVE 0J, TYP . . .......... < ... . . ............... ....... .. .... ............. .......... 'CONC U . ............ . . .......... ... ..... WAY IM 10 P, L/ A �4 10, HEADWAL.L. 57 1Z U CT U R'E Uj HEADWA 7RUCr ...... . .. ..... w F 57AI L '�EE PET 5E DE < Of= 5LAe �4 ... .............. .. CAST 5 6C 6 L 'I N I N4/ WALL ..... ... ...... DGiE OF CONC .. ....... .. FN F-TA 6- P E TA'I L 2 IC 5 . ........... .. r->RIVF=, TYF :D Z co SEE DET 61C ------A/C FA\i EM EN7 A _LL OR I V ES z A/C,PA14EMEWT GEE I'DET 5/C EE DET O/C-2 R 70 < THK all (�ONC LA5 f�F HOf� I ZONTAL CONG PAD FOR 0 MAII-15OXF-S NT L." F0 I 'CORN ER 0-� WALL W/4�4e I�Z E "A L MID PL,�N,E- F HEADWALL 1;�Tpur-TPRp- 0, S M -A ..... ...... ir 'T H I C KBI DP- T­ 51C 3 A I M 5FE '5HT C-G FW LGC E D r-q 1-, -5 1- 1- P ET r DRIVE 0 ...... REINF�W/ # -4 e 12 -72( .... .... ..... ..... 9 DA F-A,)NA G OF SLA15 .... . ....... .......... (n 0 Z z 1y) 0 -C ::3 5 H T ....... 0 .... .. .... ...... 7YP 4 PL'CS)�- Lr- Lj . .... ... ... ry X__X �50 ...... ... .. ... ... . .... ... .... . .......... 0 . . .. ......... .......... -45 .. ..... ......... . . . ......... .. .... (7LPPOI`� Af ........... ...... ..... ....... f4i .... ..... .......... TAIN I N(� WALL. . .... ..... . ...... ..... .. . ... ..... . .... .. . ..... .... ..... ..... . ... .... .. ..... .... ..... .. . ..... .. ..... .... .. . . .... ...... .... .... . .... . ---- - -- ..... ..... ..... . .... .... ... el C� r: -CONC PAD LoADiNG ��LA5 7 .......... . 4' . ...... .............. ....... 0 0 If .. . ........ .................. ...... ... .. ..... ............ rLACQ FLe) ..... . ... . -,.:-F:r= Af:�CH . . . ..... ..... .. . . . .... .. 51 L7 01 ... . .... . ..... .... P\AM'P+ .... ..... ...... . ... .... ..... . ...... ... . ..... . . ......... ....... .... ...... ...... ....... ... . ..... .... ..... ..... ... ..... ...... . .. .... ...... ... ... -7 UN ........ ....... ;,<* * I . ... . ....... ......... -7 I.... ...... C . .......... ....... ..... ........... ... ..... ......... '160 41 26 �Al 40 201 R (6 r3 FI L L 'W1 AS P HA LT, M;= NJT TED '�A/C PAV F= U) P (5 PLCG,) eF_E DET e�lc �C-4 X_ C 5 STATES K X ... ... .... . .... . .. ..... .... . ..... ..... ..... . .... .. .... . . ..... .. .... ............. POSTAL X CC) N C,,_ Cj, ...... . ......... . ...... ... .... ... . .......... ....... Df� ... . ..... SERVICE TY P ...... ..... .......... . 101 4' PERRINVILLE CARRIER FACIL TY ........... NOTES' EDMONDS, WASHINGTON -T .. ............... 1. DIMEN51ONS "5HOWN AkE 0 FACE 017� CUF�13 OF� WALL, .. .......... . ...... 2. TOP OF IRRIGATION 6LEF-VE TO DE MIN 1.01 E LOW- ...... .... ....... ell FS9 1- - . _ - " ­_. - - E! > 0 T T 0 N A 0 C 0 N C F ET I- IF,, I W 61 ........... .. ........ . ........... 5 A ..... ..... -710 GLEEVES DRAWN BY. :BJB 5. COORDI�JN7F LOCATION OF I R F) 1 N .. fr - PLAM, W17H IRRI(!�A ..... ...... . .. ..... .. . ... ... ... ... . .10 7 . ..... :LEGEND . ..... .. . . ... ... . ..... HICK OVF-9 ... . ... ...... ... 4. ALL NEW CONGRE7F_ WALKS SHALL .. ... ..... . .. ... .. . .. ........ .... . ... .... ..... . . .... '21' THICK LA"YE9 OF CF�UISHED F:�OOK 5EDDINGI., SCOF�E ...... ... .. . .. ...... .. .......... + TION CHECKED BY. LB .......... . . ... .. . . .... .. .. .. . ..... 5" PVC, IF916A 4,0'OC. PROVI,DE EXPANGION VVALK 112 D E E= P 0, .. . . ......... ........ . . HEDULE 40 '/ .......... JOINTS. FILLER),A7 ALL A51LITTINIC-i CON57RLICTiON. N PROVIDE 211 DE . . . . . . . ...... . ... ........... ONC��E-7F_ F>A\/F- ENT) P 5'y ..... ..... . ...... . ....... . . ...... ............ ...... B Y'.'TA K . ........ APPROVED . .. .. ..... WIDF SAWN CONTROL JOINT6'G 15.0'OC MAXIM.1-IM. ....... . ... ........ GEAL JOINT) AF,TER CUF�ING WITH APPROVED JEMRES Y�20/ 8 CONC DRIVE CAU LK PF0 EF� IA L .. ...... .. REIN F 4 12- AT ALL ADUTTINIGI COMF7ACTI '6UL3CIRADE . ....... . . ....... ... ..... ... VIC�I= V�" F=XRAN5I0N JOINT MAT� ....... ............ ............ MAXIMUM DEMISITY EA WAY IN MIDPLAN� . . .. .... ....... .... ..... OF SLA E) 7YI* 4 I'LAGES DRAWINGS SCALE r, ROW eHALL (4MFORM ............... . ........... L� ......... Co. ALL CONeTRUCTION'WITHIN 7HE,FWF.;,LI' TA N TO THE CITY OF PA R, D3) DETAILS AND -5PECIFICATIONt5 ....... ...... . ........ ..... REMOVE EXI57A510HAL7 DE THE-1�88 'GTAN[)Af:Z() SPEr-IFICATIONr- FoK,,. ... . ....... ....... WHICH INCLU PAVING PLAN. SIDEWALK CONC CUR5 D CON55TRUCT ROA D'aR I DG; G AN ION" FREPAITED, BY _17 E 7 H fE 5H I W(�TON 5TA DFFAI`ZTMENT OF TRAN5M-R7ATION AND AM1591CAN FUf�>LIC. W�RK$ A'��O�,IATION, WA514INC;TON 5TATI� L CHAPTEK, PAVIING, PLAN - 1.11 = 201 tACK F I I-L I*!IZ WAL�. MAN LIFAC-7URE R& RECOMMENDATIONS rR.E CA57 CAP 5LK GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PUBLIC: RIGHT OF " WAY SHALT, CONFORM TO THE 1991 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNIGIPLE CONSTRUCTION PREPARED BY 'THE WASHI GTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND :THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION,' WAS INGTON STATE CHAPTER. PAVEMENT, CURB AND GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TRAFFIC CONTROL WITH THE CITY - OF . EDMONDS . TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE AS OUTLINED . BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS TRAFFIC -CODES, THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE MANUAL ON- 'UNIFORM .TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES,, ( UTCD), PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 3 THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFOR14ATION WAS PROVIDED' BY THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY UTILITIES 'WITHIN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. .4. 42" DIAMETER -:RCP SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M 170 CLASS II. 121, DIAMETER RCP..SHALL CONFORM TO.AASHTO M.86, CLASS '2-,.' r Z 10., %` <p 14 ........ ............................ _.__. — ... r. a - .„ srKi, x G¢. as «._((.w..__....._...._.................. ...... - £, - r'«t ..ai y.{q's. .. f Fs i.F f r ♦F€ 'h •«. , .. ., 13 .. ,,,t f LUe t X ! aT 4 . ���TOIR,m yAMf�Hj i SAI ��� �./ f✓ f V 1v z'S a,o'2 R y E� XIST 615 ..7L, Nv PLU67 15XI15 t PIPE F'LU 5X 15'1' ; t Y M �"`T f �+k 4 Q J 4> ) ,a. «` / Y a. Z& 4b.w..,........«.:«..«.w.......................................«,.....,.«,.,.w,.w,..,«.«.,...«...«..,..,.M,.,,va+.,.«....«...w.w««...w.,_„w.w,.«.w..w,.,..,..,«....,w...«.,..w.......,.......a....... ..,........... ,e....... t..,.......................,...............,................ ,..... r}, � �� �� i yr f v'.f� ¢ C / .f• _ �� E� fit. >ua• I o , 7 G si..,w...,...w,...,.,,,.,w..,.........«w.,,,w.,«.«.w.,. »:- } z3c.1i ��, ..\.. o �'" .i, M.�> f � ., w• r^ '\�. .., ��, i J54l"irc'�/�� 'fYI�' Ti2Et�lGH SGT g NG�1 Mtn s` f £f F yr r £i w r . .,ram. •..j_ �..�r<..�i'a _ ¢ % W _arm —— (=}�/� — r {��r^; '— _ — — _ .— = _ _ �,.» / Toe OFfl,�i`��: ✓cr/ ,� F xk ! i f h F W L/. -7 .�... V' a. a ; t. b ft,. F a a� la T... AV s M T , i �� ,, W sx �o ° �.._ �_ wmm.__..�. :............_...w �,......_�� «s OL ds fs ;�..�. ^ a .:'`<^l,:''r / { . ,,., ,—!✓ _ L, sit _ ................._ mm m_ .-.__._._..._._.-..._....._..._ _.. r VY a r y�F Ss 3�\ OONNeOT TO WFEW MH No 1 'f • r n..,.., _; ,, w ; =;z I �r i s ; \ W G I' e /� M R 15.yr,A A> :f 20 ° .: ,,., . ,i, -ar s>i C.a, R - MH NY, , ` 270e« f0 C >k, 0 0 f J vTA I i- OD) eee 1: � V6-2 M H No 2 ('2 } rs s{ 15TA 2- -70 !;f - f.X15CIO SEE 2/G•2 f` 4; 9F_V0Va R��'LACf, EXIST wAfi ' MAlN AS t4SCSe APY 1=09- INSTAL.LATIoW of NSW VEKIE=Y iE � :PLAN it f i _ rs' _ I'- l2EMo�1 i2 fLAGi E}CI r rr EWA[,K, GUI i IE - 26,04GL1Ti ,4raPH PVM1' PF� 1JSG�SA�Y >`DfZ I N�"iALLL-ATI bN o� r�i5w �OIM �W12 . ................. ... ex 1r5T C 5 PLUG ExIsT 40 PI PF- FILL. �.XI5T MH Wf GONG UP Td EL 2,,,-5.04 2�d < =Hx X Z33 t:X I �T GizAt�l= 2 to W lu uj 0- 280 HEADWAL ETI;UGTU E / 270 SEE DET 0 tcs -- SECT A 51m ' 32 EX15 LF 170 L, F 4211 � Er G P ._._._. 00 P I L 42'� d� G P. @ 0.762 % @ O.7 5G 2l 0 @ 0.710 cyo Z=d 2 <v0 -' EL CDO. � �' � v < W W iU UJ ky + d o0 1 do 2 00 �n ANDSIRSFEN BJORNSTAD Z Z' a KANF_ o JACOBS ' INC. < -' CONSULTING ENGINEERS � Z � O OHO " 0 � Z � 220-,WEST HARRISON. SEATTLE. VVA. 99419 � Z ' UD 130 ts1 C2063 285 -1185 Z 0 ` Lij - W L,J (� z Z (f} Q O < V) Q 00 ry Lu 0) V) - © V) zoz C'4 0 V)I� Of 0 �- LJ U 4 /�y V ! w a. a. Q (L p Iin W bj i— QLd [� z �c I I� In It ' � l aUJ LLI .z,- U El h *� cn Z ,w © 0 LL 0 w W DRAWN BY: VCA CHECKED BY: DLB APPROVED BY: TAK Architecture 400 Doyle Building A Professional Interiors 119 Pine Street Service Urban Design Seattle, WA 98101-151-1 Corporation Phone: 206.624.8154 Fax: 206.624.0541 1575 REGISTERED z o z o ARCHITECT ¢ `�ii m DAMD M. HEWITT K. as ca o STATE OF WAiiNG70Pt oo z z. 0, 00 z . c� rn z z w 0 LO w o t ry c� V J �-`- z I Lv w 0 C/) Ory z I _1 w Q I < v (') Q I C!� -I rn I 0 0 LLJ >�o � z(0z n EN0 w oao0 W I C!- naDw I LJ Q ~0 " Ui t.i. z r� w V ! W n Lv I I- < I W L/) I � w I fo o W I I 9 ¢ w z o i 0- a ui Z z _0 0 F (n LL 5 V W Ly a w w UNITED i S TZ-1 TES POSr7 1-'AL SERVICE.,- PERRINVILLE CARRIER FACILITY 98026-9998 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON DRAWN BY: MJV CHECKED BY: KRS APPROVED BY: MRA 1. . ' �� / t` . t . e �t 1� I 2 t ,r 1 :- Architecture 400 Doyle Building A' Professio��al �.���, C Interiors 119 Pine Street Service �i� WA 98101-1511 Co oration. 6 1 f` � , _ Urban Design Seattle, rP � % V � I P Phone: 206.624.8154 '1 �, • ��v �` "i C C '' Far. 20fi.fi24.0541 I I r� ` -- - — . _ 4 �. u . . A D�R�E� _). _ . i ,, i ' J J�3f1��'��4� z o z `I �: `moo — f (\ '� v, . _ -. . -T-_ ( t \ �' . C SLILTING EfVGINEER3 I 0.i'T p C 1s I �'�`'- — t' ., `" , l , t �` I s r co z z I. '- ' WE HARRtSQN =. L .1 ... -� ��— - ---- ' .ASS _S5 F I f sl?A°-rnE. wA. saes tp E . z v, S _ ♦.ramie ` - -- _.—.- - - - 1 ✓ �{(/^//y�f F - C206i 285 - 9 965 Z 5.. • r1 --f ` _ L _ _ I r _. J, --�. cc. - {_ yt ; y s _ "F- _ '3 tn. koJ Y C w` y 1 -' ._- ` -- ---_ -- - I i i% 0 1 . �` 7 .\ _ �_"\`�,�. �� -,` i' ;Z ••..•_,� i,>�%i',' \,'e".^, _ ; ," •k _ �i'.-`\fly I _ {� `. _ _ _-p�� `� - \ rw rf} 4 r tG'4. k' '� ___ - -� - F1F.G, _ F3N7:l� M t - i L V _. - _ - -___ r.. .•fir \ r. -� - - _ `.. ""� °� U I �'` t ' T \-... \tGi_t fi'.. 'i'%YI•r'�i",> •�c>,{`� r , y+.,,w i .__--____.___ _•_—.__. -_ I• ! __—_.V F "' -�- _ ., -.. _ , - 2 I \ , , - _,'<+ • r ,,71, : 1"---'�•• `•__"_9'.. . c� ">. - s'f fi,,.liot _ - ' t r� , ��JJ'77 % _ -_ _ - - 5 _ . - J .__ 1 --__ `�=I- __-. , �� .., -- ,.- . "-- ..�_...__� - �- I ;4 '��` � t ty�, / ---T31 _ LF ' L.. `o - FIRc t-I`I'DRA►VT �.�. EM�:.�' z` �;`.. , //���y•• _ Z . .. - �•n ri• _ .. .. - '�' ... - ,•-_._ 2'- -+_ •--•.. '-�ZaG 9 .fir. {� ,� ':4» __-- '----_- i` ,,+•� � � /� _ _ z '-� -. �(S` -. `"--�,. - •�..._,� ...__i ': i' » -� . .4 . 4..n . G:�i - . __._. � �y�` -. r..4 _ .__. • =:r ram. � �J � . / /'► i 1L f i - '9' - _ _r - - c_ - _ �� r. �' f Q i#r� ._ �, _ — ._ j r: '. -- ----_� % , ; . . "r. : _ ..-"-....-� , • ' Y 4 „sr - . _ --__ - _ _.. _ - --------' _.... ...ice y ,.� : \ �J - �1 / .. 7� 'I ,.. `• '-�_. ,.< _• h 1 -.. _. • '3' ~ _- .c ._..__ tit. i \ _elf �� E'� . (j r� _ - _ _ ._ _ _ _ t ,,�r/�+� "�' �, .ifs � S,� -_--.. a �� _ o `;. .-.►--^ � Z_ � <L :. , . �_ 1 ti .. _ _ :�. _ tit tl+ nv,.1 y� G� :,, - r- y < ZS- f . _ w # A . - - —.... ti .:_ _ _--..._-._ . -- _ - - - -- ,"�; _ _ :.tram,..:. �3.t �} - _ 9 .. ^► ,r• ` Q 1 € - - tea. - y _._,` - _.- . _.... . _.. .. - :Y .. _ .. .. .— —. - .aP T� - -- -- \ z . - _ lJGTU rc - _ - _ • , ,¢ � ` , r s y - - # r ANT - _ _ _. _ __ - ->�- 6 s' _ _ r T, -. s -- — �r,• -' , 6 :SEED �. - '_ _.. _..'- - - ' - _ F - -� -- _ �� G-- -- 1 .� i _ -.• fie? . _ ._; r. : Y `, rT t y _ },�� �` _ .. i'r r� ,e L3 i - " , - i '• O • V .. - �. �+( .. , ._ _.. __ ( _ ry • it _ . y ii,� : : ti i { I A 1 t :, c.> ('��! f 1 _. - • \ s to a 1 y • ,� . \ i-�' `r - — 70, -- -s- - . .: 4 — - ( a t_ f' 2 TX _:.:. _.. _.;,:.. _ • R P - _- QUAf'2. _ ; Y At.l. faRFAV EL --> - I . . a --; � �� 2 -- 'G - m _ G .J�I✓ f .-« �- O \ j/m+ . `• 1 :! is \\ v - -_ i .. .. �Ji l .1'� -- ' • L �.G-..- - '�- ---' - �'---�, �r . __ _ . , i -- - 2.2 - — - - � � 26q - � }- - -. D r - a ,. —. _ - rr L . \ _.� - . } y n L' t , : i _. \ - /� -- -- �G 6 p - I �l� t Z �i( v'`'�^ s_ _ - �'1Ti✓.lr? tR� - 2�$ 'l 2l� d �� .gi X i a _ — _ - _ C = • i -\Q`, -- , Ov ' e ✓ _LlY3 : L-• yr - �- z�2 �a ` _ 1 ' Q 1 ( e. '5 r Y, 'r - J . p s✓ - i ' - Z r 2 /y ' `I-' f ,'Y . - V `•" LLS i s_ _— I - - o(a Z fa �. Z ! v- — .1] i � � �y, S "i E D.. 1 \ --- I 0 �� 2 • _ _ _ - i - , , . v it , . , r_r a ._ _ _ - - ,�j n "S H i. a. r. ! ! �. . " :�° .a 2 - 1. �• R-IMF 2�f_.�9 _ 2� E�3 o _?L. _1! �a �i �L11 MEtZ Y O - i� Tl• - - _ f E CMG T _ ; 1 E G.47-'- ,� '\ Ptt•-L. W •,. SEA : i7 ? Lo/G..�_ - - - �_- : _� - .\ , c•� �.1C .__._ M �/ `i0� ,� I __ --- .�. _ . _ /�y��t , .. _.. .. r A ` ,• . _L Q -- , � N i I r. -. e� / -.` . / n i - -- -�- - - - i 9 . _ y s f r�FIL.TZ CCiJ - - - o �` 1r -- �. -- , 1. -� 1 ti } . `C._} AL _ r}j -- _ �D ►� - G--;� _ . L �. I I _ - : - I f: ._ ry i » ,. :. : .. , ,� .. : \\ , `. }: ' 1 __T 69�` i h 1 �. f9) -- --- ,' 9, • 1' 1 J J ' `ti , f ^, , . t i , < , i . . ', yam- : , ( ii fir r ` '^L / r'� \ �_ .J V �:2 t :S�J .. i o 3 . l a s / 1 I� _1 .4 \ 11N1- _- T _ s.. _„- i - ... -. is '; t ; / / .... � l -. _ 1�0. - - r /fir - - �, - ... r D• /��, �. - -.; r L : ♦ r _ 7^ . ��CL/ t t� 1 �' , .. S _ _ .< 1 E � n .,, f , r I \ _ __ .. G *. - - .. _ .. ' .. - - I�1• _ , 9 _ - , .. - — - It7 , G _. 2 OV D - G S - T .f ..._..� _... I a _ >: / r.. / � f x � I to _ a_-._ �a:x 4.:..THIC W .__.._-__--_ __ E.82_ __ _ - / _ - _ . _-. _ ?I ft. � - /fJ` �-/ , 5 C� i :: 1.0 Ij ...- - _ _ .. __. - YL Ut2�Al.lJ,1-f-, Gam. JNLZ. ---- _..__-_ _ _ jj((} �'Y_ .. /�1 �- 1 , :. .. -. �� _ \ j f /'' •a, .' w I f \ >. , ems• � _....... �� � � -,t NCB .. _. - :. __ _ . ... ....: ._ _. �� � ��� - �. , _... . :; Z �� :; _ . • r ._ . _ .._ . _....- _ • - — _ QJ o _ _.......... -.-. __ rr ,^, - .. n- 1 ...... --- . V _. ti �k ' to z � 9 1 _.. . i > MH ' ' c� _... /�s� _ --- - ............. .. _ ._.. f i e Olaf _: �, p3" 6 _ t P_ 2�'04..0L- - ---.. ti h �� I �... \_t E l�Sn __1 ;5� 139 4D :.�_ ._ .I- `� 9 _ _..... LI;k - f'�;�(, pQ� ' , . : . , J .. ,�,�\ .'. t�D — _ '` - 1' •� WWW . -_._...... , .._ i 3� € - ,:' .. N O N I# CV `\ ; : . : - . i \ - /y. S - .. 1 i . r._,_._—__W i► .,.t ..... N L)r Chi -- : ,-.. . , s • „!r _' \> , _� i �rl i-/�f.J�^j 1. `i '\ V N �' AO a. '+ '-"� _,. �" < t�.: : r✓ I f�► -..) :r 1 le G ` s f ,. _ -", \ \..�'� - AEI ' t I i Y" -�\i ww..�� - ' ' '�"i,� 1:1 \ \ / �" 1 , -`i i? ' - V� f•---'fit— �� . -- _. _.... _ # �J (� • \\ �f . _ •-��- _ ..2'x ��: -r- --- _ _ _ _. _.. - _ _ _ _ o• - -- •Y tea. -t. . .: I S. ' < � - - ' I -8 \ _ -_ _ \,.• _ •. j � �# : , , , ! :I`. r F .E ' - . . �Y' —_1 __ _.-__ ._-. 1 /''"" - y , g ry E1t1 - ti1� _ _ _ � _ 1 �,� —---'�'"y/''_ _------ • : •• F i i is : _ ' / L/ i i "\ 5 - .I \ : __.�A _ tom - — ___- -- __ -- _. _ t! '� :: .T>� VA�.VE :- �.., '�� 2 _ _ __ r : . r, 't<` :, -I. O11T1� � OO _ C?. 5D _ - _ �:_ AS��.I�i �Y _ : a - _ 2 .--- - . - �- , . - , , E- W/ # � 2..z R l r�li `J , � ., pQR 2 a _ k \ � _ _ - - --- -- - __ J lv : Ca, %E-VA.�v� _ t�11N - : I f i _ ^ - - - � N t /-`_ i i - :. oy� �q •ems �' .. -- o ,. _ , , k, .. _ . < - - ; _ t t l . '-_ —�. —..: . . , : I - - <;-:, '' -te r ��� �}•� _ # : i : 4 i : € I X'�LL ✓" �, - . i .. �F _ : g Z f. _.__ to TE` - fi . - _ - - -- -.-- .. _ { �F T . - h - ,:,- . - ,. _ ... - : -._ .. ___- ----- _ _• _. - < pry -_ ANGE SHA GON F �, - - -L_1v -. ,-# - . , _ A ht P E _>' r - -..� pUR7 _ _ — . �; N LL ., ,� _ --. _' __ r, _... - 'TAN D r•G;.P` - 7 I _._iJ .. tJ L __ 1 .4 • ::: �� ieM T T __ c AR .- _ . �� \r .� , - Tom. �XEST ATIr - LY Tt-t E SAS .. _ - G Ufa v� A; _. . _ �- DRA ,� 1[ifN BY .. \ .. �. �: • _ ' __ b. _ _ __-- . �... %`v . 4. _ DE PA.-# t� E.N T GS F F i A f' �. - . ... - _-- - ___ TA# ION _ "_ a ,.._� i , .... °' ,. .._ '.x:.. :G^ ;[ - - r _ t ... _. - _ .. :.•." -... � .... .....- _...- ._. - -- _•.. .. �•- ,. •.�• - - �1G�AN PIU�LIGWORY O o� .. .. 5 G _-.__ /..... ... ,� i- _ }� l ! B` y - -- - - _.. --w ' - _.._ _ BJB �. ,!-.-' ^ .. .. --- _. ... .. . ... . _. _ - _.. > :>i ki ..... .. .. -, - __ _.._ _. _. .- ...-- .... _......_•_. :.-''',7 . %.r i . - ��.�, ' f. .,\ � - _.. � FLED �! +� . ......_ �[� .- - _ ... _ __. • Y a o- s� c c -..._.__._ - _ .. _ - .. o . - - - - I D E E .' _ _ - - :.. r _ s .t :f _ _�R ,4 a �n • / Yt,Y ... ._ r— ._ .. ��� • •Q , .� _ - - _ CHECK __... _ _ - _ ED BY .b<' -' _ ___. .._.-.. ti . -,. a+ __ _ . _.. - . r -.._. .: G.. >'_ . .._ - -- XI. CcCUI�E PAYMENT ITH IN W -��1:i=W V�IATE R :: .. . _ . 1 _. - Z - DLB ., ;�. . - - -- - . — -t - --- . - - ,� _ :.: . _... _ F., �__:._. _.. - ,( AG.._ O W I APPROVED BY. EXIST;-DJk1EtJaiDt�lS S D ARE TOE F G p:3 O :: .: P E•pi l t�A . 2t�- F :. .. _ : __ _ - E _ -cam.: p ItTATt .. Y>:;:. :: _ _ .. E _ a T .O T� �' E E N , -: . , - .r :: S� -- -- - - - �. �E_. _ __ ,..__ - _ . - ..�_..__ . -- C1N��UG 3 1Otil LI Er�l1 5, 5 c DcT 7/G 2 �s a/2 _._ .; _._ _ _... _ __._._ � i:%t � G' i TEG'T'URAL Pt.�i�l S FOr�-[=Et�IG- C'A"f'E D E l�s.I LS = ::--=� ----- .. -,� - F ,_L _ — -:-• - - - _...... _ I - --r .. , 1 - _ -- - -- -- .. _ . __ GF ._ . _. _ _ - - ' _ -.. -- - .. -_� _ S NDI T FINS - -- _ . -- - - E' �vA+ �� ;. - _- - -� // ••77 --;-= Q 26 =--- CONTDUKS�" IDhJS- S-IOWiJ-�.DJ�►GLI�T TQ CL'R- . I. ADD. D.I . ./�. : " VA Iv ,t G'� \ r L E TC YALvc- ► i N C BOX ��ToP C_ ,.CUSS. __ -- - -- _ - -- -'- ----- ---- . - - -- r.��,.. .? ' ' , '� ' ' Y /, �,� o F1RE �-iYA NT C F -- - -- -- -- - -- ---- . _--- - ';f- _� .`; , - �GORPOtz AT ION, ,STOP, ' -- __ CATG N4..5A.Si N CC �) v `' ,.., ___ ._ GD NN GT Tdx I _: r101.E_- ..__... b�f �Tft . V►�Y SIZE __ -_ -- - -9- . _ POWFR_POLE CPP) .. _ . _ _- _ __. —.. =_ _- - - . S..mgm DRAIN .: __ r: �� wl> -N F,w f5i1 � WA-rEX - MAI W .. 4.. —San —�5-- SAN I TARi SEW E g ' - I i - ,�. . . i -A�dx.._I75'--WofzTH ..-r DM 'tH ! . Pdll jT _ f- NN�GT TU �xlri fin . ... _ _ � �- G._- �..UTI LIT` P`LA w�� W... WATER , n u N .. _ _ RD—. !�,DD, F D i.. ' ` , OJECT NG NO i�I-11Qt�L /�_to_x t� _ .1z�1�U G t�- --- -... k _ , CAI N . ,; a. DRA1M -2o PR N - _ _ . - - 1 9022.000 0 YE _V_mJ_Y_.m_ !_.� a0x _,y_ FD -- - FLODR DRAIN _.. i �{� C LEl�N O UT C CDC � } \ __._ _ ..---_ - P�EL�II®1��� ��TUCT DATE a OF ' i . . I --- 1,r - - - i - - 1 � __-- - --- ' ----- "-- - - -- - - - - - - _ , . . -- - :-___/ .\ . _ . .