The URL can be used to link to this page

123 2ND AVE S Redacted11111111111111 14195 123 2ND AVE S ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: & -lj�/f� BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): 90- �0�_ COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: M'/./g DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required prwaiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DA' PARKING AGREEMENTS DA EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:�� D/ SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE LID SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: �a n SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) WATER METER TAP CARD DA' LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\.Street File Checklist.doc r ewl_141 When recorded mail to:. City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 �o2ao ^ aa�E�woEoo<v RECORDER'S NOTE: PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE POOR QUALITY FOR SCANNING. SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Assessor's Parcel No.4948-001-023-00214w.001. Project No. & Name: c?d01-04IVq �',edlt,Soiv, �d/no/�d5 60227e,,07 BLb ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and1!�) 61J ("Owner[s]"), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. 1. The Property. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at l23 2 ►� U� 'MU , 5> , within the City of Edmonds, Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number �5 $fit 1 9 3 40 , and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Business owner,L(L71-k12C7t�i1.� is the business owner of that certain real property noted above. 2. The Easement. The City currently owns an existing easement over, under, and across Owner's property for street, alley, sidewalk, (other ) which is described in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. The Encroachment. The City hereby cAgstnd agrees and grants its permission to Owner or Business Owner to allow e: /� o%(F_ S� f 2x)b'AvE S. to remain in a portion of the City right-of-way/easement. A plat map showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The encroachment shall be installed and maintained in a safe and sanitary condition at the sole cost, risk, and responsibility of the owner and its successors in interest. b. The Owner shall agree at all times to indemnify and hold the City free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, damages or expenses resulting from the -1- construction, maintenance, use, repair or removal of the structure installed hereunder, including any loss, damage or expense.arising out of (1) loss or damages to property and (2) injury to or death of persons. C. The Owner must remove or relocate any part of the encroachment within ten (10) days or such other time as specified in the notice after receipt of it from the City Engineer, or the City Engineer may cause such work to be done and the reasonable cost thereof shall constitute a lien upon the property. d. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected by city's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachment structure. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. 5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial means and addressed as follows: If to the City: City Engineer City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 If to the Owner: ue�l �f U6CO sree6r` Sg-re.5523 which addresses may be changed .from time to time by providing notice to the other party in the manner described above. 6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. Any waiver by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement. -2- 7. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successor's, and assigns. Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision. 8. Ca aci . Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s) thereby bind such party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this /2) Wt.) day of ( , 20�. C i3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) This day, personally appeared before me, to me known to. be the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing document and that (he/she/they) __— signed the same as (his/her/their) .5` and voluntary act and deed:.for'.'the..uses and purposes therein mention }`Ssro+t{,, w, tar Public =i i o V" t0 Lt�= � � Typed or Printed Name M1•. ✓ My Commission expires: r P� Sdd, glb v32:"''r� CITY OF EDMONDS By: ENGINEERING DIVISION G:\SHAP,E\TEMP\BUILD[NG\HANDOUT\EncroechAgree.doc — 3 — 11: FX H/B /T �f RTSQ :03E27N23 -SE APN :00 4548 001 023 00 OldParcel :4548 001 023 00 02 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Easement Census :Tract:505.00 Block:4 Neighborhood Code :500 MapGrid:454 F5 Zoning :Bc Zoning Rest Actual Use :Whse Storage Building Name :Jim Manning Neon Signs Land Use :492 Misc,Transportation Services Subdivision/Plat :Gepharts 1St Add To Edmonds Legal :GEPHARTS 1ST ADD TO EDMONDS BLK 001` :D-00 - ALL LOTS 23 & 24 Volp5 Page :43 5 I Ex��,��T QUARTER SE 23- 27 '00 f-03a L O0 EL CAPITAN (A COND (6782) 4-082 i co + co VIEW `: 0 = Q LAZA " —.n ea -,rim R - - - — - - / r / Q 4-05 f ; + }F1 {}y} ! 6641H� + s4/--046 �h7� ' ! AM1 48 +u 4-054 i +H,ajivAY V3. 4-049 c I Z00110290522 i June 19, 2002 MEMO TO STREET FILE 123 2"d Ave South SUBJECT: Delivery of Trailers at 123 2"d Ave South Paula Ferreira, Facilities Manager, spoke. with Pam Lemcke and Lyle Chrisman on separate occasions regarding temporary usage of the parking stalls along 2"d Ave and James Street. She had been informed that no right-of-way permit would be needed, but that a traffic control plan would be required because the trailers would be taking up part of a lane. She was also told to get a Parking Permit from the City Clerks office to enable her to block the 3 hour parking stalls for more than 3 hours. A traffic control plan was submitted by Jerry Cox of R. Miller Inc. (attached). A letter was also submitted to the City's Police, Fire and Public Works Departments notifying them of the blockage. The letter outlines the dates and times of the trailer deliveries. June 5, 2002 CITY OF EDMONDS Public Works Departments Police Department Edmonds Fire Department 121 5`h Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 To whom it may concern This letter is to alert you about a project at office building located at 123 Second Avenue South, Edmonds WA. 98020. We have schedule four trailers to be delivery at that location. First trailer to be delivery on Monday June 10, is to arrive at 8:am Second trailer to be delivery on Monday June 10 is to arrive at 1:00pmi . Third trailer to be delivery Tuesday June 11 is to arrive at 8:00am. Four trailer to be delivery Wednesday June12 is to arrive at 8:00am Each trailer will take approximately four hours to unload. Scissors lift to be use to move the products, Monday and Tuesday, but not on Wednesday. Please call me if you have any questions. At (425) 921 1715 and (206) 715 0977. PAULA I FERREIRA Facilities Manager i ®C CC JUN 0 5 2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Post Office Box 1599, 123 Second Ave. South, Edmonds, WA 98020 ■ Tel: 425.744.7700 ■ Fax: 425.744.1400 Austin, TX Oakland, CA New Orleans, LA Ottawa, Canada Olympia, WA Wenatchee, WA Tacoma, WA RECEIVED: 6/ 5/02 3:33PM; #MONDS; #438; PAGE 3 06/05/2002 WED 15:13 FAX i .30, f6 003/004 , , , , , , RECEIVED: 6/ 5/02 3:32PM;--EDMONDS; #438; PAGE 2 06/05/2002 WED 15:13 FAX • 0 2 002/004 SO N Page 6H-59 Decombcr 2000 Figure 6H-27. Closure at Side of intersection (R27) 30 m (100 it) MAX. \ -1 /no A i B J See Note 2 for flagger information �jrDc�R�� C: I,ds `� 'typical Appllcatl0n 27 5 1 CI N Note: See Tables G s-e�6�se' ng of the symbordlorer cDdes used this figure. I ATIFS f 'n M a5 (o-tv -oL THR��K 4~ �3-eL 5 ; ac Ar A -M 5': o c) fowl sue. 61i0J • %� �, ,, ;� ,, � �� 1 ,� '� � / � \� �� ,� ,\ �l ,� ,� �. � � '.. /� lF ILE NO. ritical Areas Checklist C-q - or,> -.-:. 141 ------- --------- ------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 131 f—t*JV LVe.NEE. _C-xj,-ru 2. Property Tax Account Number: 1'E'54$.00I.O2,-0002L45,,t8.001•o20.60nc;, 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 1 040 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 71e S� 4_ 68+QJ�► tL SMa r M Ll b1 a 7_cx 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: NO ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: A70 ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway _ Q floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? p D Flows are seasonal? AJQ (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs ;mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: �1 D y, -' .... ........... "'......,.... r.,.. Fori Staffse 01 ... .. ^..: <. � S L SCS lna ped so�l:typeiys}? 3 yU drA; .. VJ5A 1 * }.i�1..F.PXaa' x. 9 . �?V od.iitvento + or ,„map uidlcwetland present on slke"� :xitacal Arias it�t+entor�r of A xiap Yrx�icate§:Csitcaj tea on-srte?`�. -. :". Site �vithtn designaie& earth su�s�depc landslide hazafd• area ........ <...... ....... , ..... . €6 Site desi$rato o.#herlironrnehlally I.Senstcte Areas ia�x..?. :...::. : _•. ,SI ACVhkdK Aw IWWI97 Ll 0 of .EDM xK .°tip City of Edmonds Development Services Department 4 Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 �4c. 189� Critical Areas File #: Cft -00" 149 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: a ' City Receipt No: < <a ) Date Mailed to Applicant: CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: 4wi 0 V\ Name Sn 01 U-NU o h �� . S U- x- 4-1 Z Street Address 'Jo ko City State Zip Date Applicant Representative: KatAyJ � W1. a V\S.y"( )'e.c f Name Street Address w `W b 1 City State Zip 2j-p to �o Zu Telephone Signature 9 i o0 Date d:receptioNlana/CACLHandotd.doc Revised 4/102000 i When recorded mail to: City Clerk CONFORMED COPY City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North 200201100231 Edmonds; WA 98020 01/10/2002 12:15 PM Snohomish P.0003 RECORDED County SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE n Assessor's Parcel No. 45800 0 _-1000 Project No. & Name: LCGI1.: _?,3 �?7/,e3 NE /V ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and HIIGH S. FERGUSoN ("Owner[s]"), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. 1. The Property. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at 121 — 2nd Ave. Southwithi th Ci of Edmonds, Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number 4548-001-023-0002 ,, �� re poa-Ri �z�arly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Business owner, Hugh S. Ferguson is the business owner of that certain real property noted above. 2. The Easement. The City currently owns an existing easement over, under, and across Owner's property for street, alley, sidewalk, other (alley along easterly prop. line) which is described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. The Encroachment. The City hereby covenants and agrees and grants its permission to Owner or Business Owner to allow the temporary shoring system to remain in a portion of the City right-of-way/easement. A plat map showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The encroachment shall be installed and maintained in a safe and sanitary condition at the sole cost, risk, and responsibility of the owner and its successors in interest. b. The Owner shall agree at all times to indemnify and hold the City free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, damages or expenses resulting from the -1- A construction, maintenance, use, repair or removal of the structure installed hereunder, including any loss, damage or expense arising out of (1) loss or damages to property and (2) injury to or death of persons. C. The Owner must remove or relocate any part of the encroachment within ten (10) days or such other time as specified in the notice after receipt of it from the City Engineer, or the City Engineer may cause such work to be done and the reasonable cost thereof shall constitute a lien upon the property. d. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected by city's grant of permission to construct and. maintain the encroachment structure. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the. subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. 5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid, registered or certified with, return receipt requested,' or by other comparable commercial means and addressed as follows: If to the City: City Engineer City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 If to the Owner: Hugh S . Fercauson 601 Union St., Suite #5523 which addresses may be changed from time to time by providing notice to the other party in the manner described above. 6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. Any waiver by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision'of the Agreement. -2- 7. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to . the property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision. 8. Ca aci . Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s) thereby bind such party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this 31st day of May , 2001 OWNE (): By: By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) This day, personally appeared before me, Hugh S. Ferguson , to me known to be the person(s) who executed the within and going document and that (he/she/they) he signed the same as (his/her/t ir) his andi�y act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentio e ;ee .11 Ndtary Public -'Rhonda L. DeVito Typed or Printed Name My Commission expires: 10-1-o2 CITY OF EDMONDS B alelz"r' �tQc Y• ffE- ENGINEERING DIVISION G:ISHARE\TEMP\BuILDING iAl-=Unsnmacnngradoc - 3 - A .. 4 0 OF EDM � O� f S�EET RtE St. 1 99v ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION PROP ERTY ONVNER NAME: HUGH S. FERGUSON Phone 206-622-4555 PROPERTY OWNER iv1AILING ADDRESS: 601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5523, SEATTLE , WA 98101 BUSINESS NAME for Commerical applications: SAME ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: 131 2nd AVE SOUTH, EDMONDS , WA 98020 *************************************************************************************** Describe the portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area to be utilized (i.e., overhead space of sidewalk, 10 foot City utility easement along north property line, etc): Below Grade snaca of tha 1AIn" p„hii alley along the east property line beginning at the northeast proi:)erty corner and running- approximately 142'-0" Sniifh to thA cn„t east pr-a9®xt�, corner. Describe the type of encroachment or use desired (i.e., fence 6 feet by 150 feet, awning 3 feet wide by 7 feet long, etc.): A 24" wide flange steel beam will be placed in a 36# diameter hole to a depth of approximately 36'-0" below the having surface. The 36" diameter hole will be filled with grout. This assembly. will.:.remain in place. Specify the length of time for use (i.e. awning for life of building, espresso cart for summer months, etc.), _Life of the building. ;'VOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature and that no vested right is granted. hVDE,V.V1TY: The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the Cin! of Edmonds harmless from anv injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description ivharsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may, be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or and• of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense or anv legal proceedings including defense costs. court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the application understands that the City shall be provided a Certificate of Insurance to indemnity and hold harmless the City of Edmonds from all claims and/or property damage, and naming the City of Edmonds as an additional insured. CODE .4PPLIC.4 TION:, By signing th Chapter 18.70 of the Edfnonds Comrr incorporated herein as ifvet forth in-4 t SIGNATURE PROPERTi' OVA rlication below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had the opportunity to read Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are d this application and permits therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter. INESS OWINER TE j ��J Encroachho.docjlg 10/00 CRITERIA OF PERMIT APPROVAL The applicant shall follow the noted conditions on the building permit. For applications that do not require a building, permit the following criteria shall be maintained at all times. Provide safe pedestrian travel for sidewalk encroachments. Maintain a clear zone of 44 inches minimum. See definition of clear zone below. Exterior light fixtures, banners and flags must be a minimum of 7 feet above City right-of-Nvay. Maintain clear landings on the exterior side of all required exit doors of 44 inches or no less than width of door, measured toward the street. No projections into City alleys are permitted unless the projection exceeds 15 feet above pavement surface. Do not block illumination from City light fixtures or hang objects from City light standards. Architectural projections from buildings must be approved by the Design Board and conform to Uniform Building Code requirements. A building permit shall be required for such projections. > Maintain 3 feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts and valves. > Bistro dining tables and chairs must be placed in accordance with City Ordinance No. 3293. > -Merchandise racks, espresso carts, flower planters, benches must not be located within the "clear zone". Ramps require a separate building.permit and must conform to UBC standards. Clear Zone Definition: Clear Zone refers to an area 7 feet in height and 44 inches in width providing a level safe walking surface along the public sidewalk (i.e. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree grates or newspaper stands toward place of business and from the ground up to a height of 7 feet). ------------------DEPARTMENT APPROVALS ---FOR CITY USE ONLY ------------------- Planning Division Approved By L'rv✓ ADB# h%% Date Remarks or Comments:�+- Public Works Approved By Remarks or Comments: Engineering Division Approved By Remarks or Comments: Certificate of Insurance Verified By - Easement Agreement sent to City C1 ENCROACHMENT P RELEASED BY T to 6(VJI ate 1-31 /0( for recording Date IT# ISSUANCE DATE Tn BUILDING PERMIT # RECORDING # Encroachho.docjlg 10/00 ACO-RD- CERTIFICAGE OF LIABILITY INSUFWNC�E OPID DATE(MWDDIYY) RGU-1 06/01/01 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Bellevue Western, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE dba : Kibble 6 Prentice HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P O Box 3467 I ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Bellevue WA 98009-3467 Phone:425-454-2445 Fax:425-646-9616 INSURED Ferguson Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 80867 Seattle WA 98108-0867 COVERAGES INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: St Paul Fire and Marine Ins Co INSURER B: INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFE E DATE MM/DDIYY POLICY EXPIRATION DATE MMIDDIYY LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE Fx-1 OCCUR X Owner/font Prot. KKO8400286 06/01/01 06/01/02 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5000 PERSONAL BADVINJURY $ 1000000 X Stop Gap 6 EBL GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY J RO- LOC CT PRODUCTS -COMPIOPAGG $ 2000000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ED EDATAUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS SCHEDULED HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED ALTOS KK08400286 RECEIVED (� J U IY — 4 2001 'ENGINEERING DIVISION 06/01/01 06/01/02 COMBINED SINGLE LIMB (Ea accident)ALL $ 1,000,000 X INJURY(Perperso $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC ALTO ONLY: AGG $ $ A EXCESS LIABILITY X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE x RETENTION $ 10000 KK08400286 06/01/01 06/01/02 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5000000 AGGREGATE $ 5000000 $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY TORY LIMITS I I'JE'R E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE _$ S E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS The City of Edmonds, its officers, agents, and employees are added as additional insured with respect to temporary shoring work performed by the Named Insured on their behalf. CERTIFICATE HOLDEK N I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: L:ANULLLA I IVN EDMONO2 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL -0_ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL City of Edmonds IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 REPRESENTATIVES. AGVKLI LOa IIIN/) -INGO ACORQ- CERTIFIC.-AM OF LIABILITY INSU E DATE(MMiDDIYY) 05/30/2001 PRODUCER (425)827-7400 FAX (42S)827-7402 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION McDonald Insurance Group Inc ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 416 6th St S ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. PO Box 3099 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Kirkland, WA 98083-3089 INSURED Hugh S. Ferguson INSJRERA: Maryland Casualty Company 601 Union St., Suite 5523 INSJRER5: Seattle, WA 98101 IN3JRCR C INSJRER D INS, IRFR F COVEKA0=1 THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH. POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY NUMBER CP 31431894 DATE M 06/05/2001 DATE MMIDD 06/05/2002 LIMITS EACHOCCUP.FEFJ�= $ 100,00 FIRFI-AMAP,F(Any mafirs; S F X CTIMMFRCIAJ (-,=NFRAJ IIARIIIT' IAED =i(P (ArN 0'le DEr50ni $ CL,MS MAOE OCCUR PCP.SCN� 8 ALV INJUFY S 300 00 GENERAL AGI-.PEGATE % Full.LAUGHLUAILLIMIIAPI`UttiNtH: PHUUULIS-LXW!UFAUU S P. T LOC POLICY ,IFR('- AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED S NOLE LIMI- (Fe accident) $ ANC .AIf-O DODIL" INJUR" (Per perEol) S ALL OWNED AJTOS 3CI ICDULCD AUTOS HIRED AUTOS bQUIL" INJUR" (Par accidont) $ NON.(l Ff) At ITni r,porERrf DAM4CE (Per accident) S GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EAACCIDENT S OTHER THAN EA ACC AU I U UNLY: AGG $ AN" AIrO $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCUP.FEN:E S A(;CP.F(=ATF S � (1CCI IR CI AIM; MAr]F $ DEDUCTIBLE S RETENTION S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND TOR" LIMTS ER E. EACH ACCIDENT $ EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY E.-. DISEASE - EA EMPLCYE= $ E._.DISEASE -POUC.YLIMIT $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILDCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENOORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS City of Edmonds is named as an additional insured. GtK I IrIGA I c nvwcn I I -- City of Edmonds Building Division 121 Sth Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 SHOLLO ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE K David Tucker/30AN eL/-./]w■�✓/ PERMIT #: �O/- 06�� DATE , PPLICATION RECEIVED: S _13 i — 0 ( ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: 13 \ ' �- M A Cam. - 'S a PROPERTY OWNER: ONCE YOUR REVIEW IS COMPLETE, PLEASE ROUTE TO THE NEXT DIVISIONIDEPARTMENT ON THE LIST. * * * PLEASE ROUTE IN THE ORDER SHOWN * * * ................. �:-:-enrovm.-•.r:.r.:-rc%s-v®.^.rcss:�e+ca.v.®e>•ssaso®�-,,-•sn��:vrs000ao.r®9rnco.��s.000v:oncenno=-, �� .-..-:c.c-.:-•.^..•:c..-. L, r �1 n '! 4 T F PLANNING DIVISION Date Stamp Received: ' r' f `' MAY 3 V ' r PUBLIC WORKS Date Stamp Received: // *-,0 n S' R `J 1.4,., nifi3uc tiroQ.v. S wry.` +JET APpi( wE j4r-tL —*- SF-& -A. PL-A4 ENGINEERING DIVISION Date Stamp Received:v--\- '- - f i DS ADMINISTRATION Date Ski Jun 5 DEVELOPMENT SERMES �:a: -. .^.re•.r'.r,vv.>:^gwsoene•a-oso:v.mm emmacne�e•m.onca>oeo.yo®o®cs-mo.9n✓.c®osonca®soov nocaa>.c•nvz•.�no�:vca.:^.r.�-:ro.^. •x.ac �'i APPROVAL SIGNATURES AND REMARKS OR COMMENTS ARE TO BE MADE UNDER THE "DEPARTMENT APPROVALS" SECTION ON THE PERMIT. RAengr\forms\Encroachment permit routing Filed at the request of, and when recorded return to: Mar-vel Marble, Inc. . P. O. Box 1449 Edmonds; WA 98020 AGREEMENT CONCERNING ADJACENT PROPERTY Y fO� gMeCAp GUM ome n �47 2pp� p03 37 pt4 gGoUntV_1 061 p41 R�Oofko p.pp0 Grantors; Mar- el Marble, Inc- ano mug" o. ■ �a+� Grantees: Hugh S, Ferguson and Mar-Vel Marble, Inc. Abbreviated Legal; Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24, Block 1, Gephart's 1 st Addition to Edmonds, Snohomish County, State of Washington. Additional Legal($) on Page: 1 Assessors Tax Parcel Number(s): 004548-001-01700, 004548-001-02000, 004548-001 02300 Mar -Val Marble, Inc. and Hugh S. Ferguson (collectively hereinafter referred to as. the "Grantors") own adjacent property in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, shown on the map attached as i Exhibit A and as more particularly described below: "North Grantor") is the owner of the property legally described as: Mar -Val Marble,, Inc. ( described tract- Lots 17, 18. 19, 20, 21, and 22, Parcel A: The North half of the following Block 1, Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds, according to plat thereof. recorded in Volume 5 Of Plats. page 43. records of Snohomish County, Washington, Except the Northeasterly 18 feet of said Lot 17, conveyed to the Town of Edmonds for public apey by deed recorded in Volume Be of Deeds, page 217: Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington; and 1 fi, Block t , Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds, according to • Parcel a;• Lots 13, 14, 15 and • 5 of Plats, Page 43, records of Snohomish County, plat -thereof recorded in Volume Washington; situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as the 'North Grantor's Property"). 1 Hugh S. Ferguson ("South Grantor") is the owner of the property legally described as; Parcet.A: The South half of the fallowing described tract: Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, artd 22 Block 1, GephaR's.1st Addition to Edmonds. according to plat thereof recorded Volume 5 - of Snohomish County, Wa"yhiregton, Except tfls Northeasterly of Pfats,•pege 43, records ; feet of said Lot 17, conveyed to the Town of Edmonds for pub5c shay by deed recorded m Volume 8$ of. beads, page 217; Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington; and to Plat Parcel 8: Lots 23, and 24, Block 1, Gephart's tat Addition to Edmonds, accord Washington; thereaf recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 43, records of SnohowIIsh County, Situate in the County of Snohomish, state of Washington (hereinafter referred to as the "South Grantor's Property"). South Grantor will be Constructing a building on South Grantor's Property, and the Grantors desire to Grantor.'s: Property., cooperate to minimize the impact of that construction, construction an.North. _. , Accordingly, the Grantors are entering into this Agreanent.Concerning Adjacent Propsr_y.;q set, forih their agreement with respect to their adjacent properties.-,. _. Now, Therefore, for and in consideration of One Dollar .($1...00) and. other good and valuabi s fon,4iWsration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby; acknowledged,.6rantors,hereby, '. • 1. AREA #1 EASEMENT (a) North Grantor hereby grants to South Grantor, its successors and assigns,. a temporary construction easementover and across the surface of an area of North Grantor's Property five feet .wide' immediately adjoining the common property line of Parcel A of North Area #1 Easement shall automand atically A of lty South Grantor's Property (the "Area #1 Easement'). Said temporary South Grantor expire upon the earlier to occur of: (a) ninety days after commencement of construction by on- South Grantor's Property; or (b) August 31, 2001; whichever occurs first. (b) North Grantor will -instruct its parking tenants net to use the Area #1 Easement, once South Grantor notifies North Grantor of the date it will commence construction. (c) South Grantor represents and warrants that it will restore the surface of the Area #1 Easement to its pre -construction condition, including restoring the elevation of said area to at least the pre - construction elevation. South Grantor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold North Grantor harmless for any costs to restore the Area #1 Easement and/or to enforce South Grantor's compliance with this Agreement. 2. AREA #2 EASEMfNr (a) North Grantor hereby grants to South Grantor, its successors and assigns', feet1wide and a construction easement under the surface of an area of North Grantor's Property maximum of fifteen feet below the existing elevation of the surface of said areal immediately adjoining the common property line of Parcel A of North Grantor's Property and Parcel A of South Grantor's Property (the "Area #2 Easement'). Said temporary Area #2 Easement shall automatically expire upon the earlier to occur ' of: (a) ninety days after commencement of construction by South Grantor on South Grantor's Property; or (b) August 31, 2001; whichever occurs first. rrants that it will install a maximum' of sixty "soil -nails" in the (b) South Grantor represents and we Area Jt2 Easement, with each soil -nail consisting of one #6 re -bar sixteen feet 06') long drilled into. the Area #2 Easement and then surrounded with a rough circle six inches (6") in diameter of grout, with all work performed from South Grantor's Property. (c) South Grantor represents and warrants that it will restore the surface above the Area 92 to its pre -construction condition, including restoring the elevation of said area to at ieest'the pre - Easement construction elevation. South Grantor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold North Grantor harmless for any r to enforce South Grantor's compliance with this Agreement. costs to restore the Area #2 Easement and/o (d) South Grantor represents and warrants that the soil -nails will no longer be an integral or I necessary part of South Grantor's building once the parking level (lowest floor) roof structural members are I in place, and will be abandoned at that point in its construction. South Grantor further represents an i warrants that it will construct the so&nalls solely as described in Section 2(b)'hereof, and further, in such a b manner as to eliminate any damage to its building that may e caused by the subsequent removal• of the soil -nails. South Grantor represents and warrants that: (i) its building will send {'rtl up a request by North (ii) its building will not rely on -any support from North Grantor's Property: Grantor, it will provide a -quit claim deed or bill of sale to the abandoned soil -nail's for no consideration to North Grantor. dig -up the abandoned soil -nails, South Grantor wil).Psy North le) Rather than. incur the expense to Grantor before the commencement of constru s disposing Of ction Three Thousand'r� $ 60 de described m sect ob) reimburse thNorth Grantor's additional expense of removing time North Grantor's Parcel A is developed. South Grantor hereby agrees to indemnify to South Grantor's Grantor harmless frarn any claim, Cost- expense, loss, obligation, liability or dar+naga building, or otherwise, resulting from North Grantor's removal Of the soil -nails after the expiration of the Area. #2 Easement or North Grantor's construction on North Grantor's Property djace and/or r enforce el�Sou he i Grantor's compliance with this Agreement. This Agreement Concerning Adjacent Property, . easements contained herein, is not effective until North Grantor has received said reirrlbursement payment from South Grantor. 3. AREA #3 Er4Swwmr al South Grantor hereby grits to North Grantor, its successors and assignsi_a temporaN Grantor's proximately construction easement over, across and under anof South Grantor,$ property and Parcel A wide, immediately adjoining the common propertyfinegrf Parcel A d the wait or footing of South Grantor's of North Grantor's Property, but not including any arAr�ea # Easement shall. automatically. expire, ninety (90) building (the "Area #3 Easement'). Said temporary days after commencement of construction by North Grantor on North Grerttor's Parcel A Property•. .... .. (b) North Grantor represents and warrants that it will restore the surface of the Area #3 Easement V to its pre -construction condition, including restoring the elevation of; said sresAo at,18W the.pre- construction elevation, unless otherwise agreed. North Gremor.hefebYegrees to indemnify and hold. Souk „ 2 Grantor harmless for any costs to restore the Area #3 Easement and/or to enforce'North Grantor's compliance with this Agreement. 4. COSYS OF WORK (a} North Grantor and South Grantor hereby agree that South Grantor is totally and completely responsible for the costs of any and aH work done on the South Grantor's Property, the Area #1 Easement, and the Area #2 Easement (except for the subsequent removal and disposal , the soil -nails as described in Section 2(b)l, Including but not limited to: site preparation and/or excavation, shoring [including but not limited to the installation of the soil -nails described in Section 2(b)l, utilities, construction, and restoration work' that North Grantor is totally and completely (b) North Grantor and South Grantor hereby agree responsible for any and all work done on the Area $2 Easement and the Area #3 Easement for the . subsequent removal and disposal of the soil -nails as described in Section 2(b). if the soil -nails are not as described in Section 2(b), then South Grantor shall be totally and completely responsible for any additional cost incurred by North Grantor as a result of the soil -nails not being as described in Section 2(b). South Grantor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold North Grantor harmless for any additional costs incurred by. North Grahtor as a. result of the soil -nails not being as described in Section 2(b) and/or to enforce South Grantor's compliance with thi's Agreement. (c) Neither party shall allow any lien for its work to attach to or by claimed against the other party's property. Each party hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any claim, cost, expense, loss, obligation, or liability resulting from any lien claimed based on work performed for the indemnifying party. 5. ADJACENT USE and will .The South Grantor is aware of North Grantor's current uses of North Grantor's -Property, eliminate any conflict between the uses on South Grantor's Property take whatever steps are necessary to and the uses on North Grantor's Property. South Grantor hereby indemnifies and holds North Grantor harmless from any claim, cost, expense, loss, obligation, liability or damage resulting from North Grantor's continued use of North Grantor's Property and/or to enforce South Grantor's compliance with this Agreement: 6. AUSCELLANEOUS (a) Agreement to Perform. Each party to this -Agreement agrees to perform any further acts and to execute and deliver such documents that may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. (b) Govern law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Washington. The venue of any action shall be Snohomish County, Washington. (c) Benefit. This Agreement shall be binding upon each of the parties and their• respective heirs, successors, and assigns; the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective heirs, successors and assigns. (d) Waiver or Modification. Each of the parties has the right to waive compliance with any obligation of this Agreement, but• a waiver by any party of any obligation will not be deemed a waiver of compliance with any other obligation or of its rights to seek redress for any breach of any obligation on any subsequent occasion, nor will any waiver be deemed effective unless in writing and signed by all: parties. This Agreement may be amended at any time and from time to time by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. (e) _Encroachment. Nothing in this Agreement sham be construed to allow either party to encroach onto the other party's property with any permanent structures Or other. improvements. (t) Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with all schedules vieains exhibits and understandings thethe entire agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes all negotiations, ag between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. (g) Attorneys' Fees. The party who prevails in any legal action, whether by lawsuit or otherwise, for enforcement of this contract will be entitled to an award of the reasonable, costs and: attornoYa' fees Incurred in the action. it will provide a certificate of . (h) insurance. Whenever either Grantor is using an Easement Area, insurance, with a minimum $1,000,000 liability limit, showing the other Grantoras an additional insured. 7. EXPIR4TION This Agreement shall automatically expire in its entirety upon the.earlier to occur. of: (a) one after commencement of construction by North Grantor on North Grantor's Property: or Ib) Aug 2026, whichever occurs first. A notice executed and recorded by North Grantor shall conclusively establish the CammerlC6ment of. Construction by North Grantor on North Grantor's Property, and thus the expiration date of this Agreement, try parties have executed this Agreement as of the 31 s day. of In Witness Whereof, the p , 2001' North Grantor: MAR-VEL MARBLE, INC. By Mark 0. 2enger cretary/Tressurer southr ntor: &'so ERGUSON y {{ S. STATE OFWASHINGTON ! 1 ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this -"'day of !!' Y , 2001, personally appeared before me Mark 0. ranger, known to me to be. the Secretary/Treasurer of Marvel Marble, Inc., the corporation that executed the.foregoing instrument, and acknowledges! tj ' ' ' ument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the use& e �i coned, and on Oath stated that he was authorized to execute the •said instrument. and purpo'� 1....,r� r Q, .��LSS/p''• ,�` Given deG a Qrr,� l seal the day first set forth in the certificate above• � �,q LA � .• . C rho • n;.,- 0- 02 Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, area 4/301 002, residing at Bellevue. My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ? COUNTY OF ! On this Si day Of. in -Ad 2001, personally appeared before me Hugh. S• Ferguson, -to me . known to be the Individual described who executed the within instrument and acknowledgeds in• that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for a uses and puM mentioned- oven•under my hand arid official seal an the date forth above in this•c �icate• tart' Public ' and for the State of Washington, :'t."::�N\�►y}•lil;l:r3 ;.•. siding at�� r►r :1. �c ..3 ►� vi,:. rally commi an expires / I :.mob T ,3. �,• y , 4 •.4 AS i lot F� • • When recorded mail to: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 CONFORMED COPY 200110290522 10/29/2001 01:00 PM Snohomish P.0005 RECORDED County SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Assessor's Parcel No.4548-001-013-00214548.001. Project No. & Name: ol�O/-aS/'y ' 0440.00,o3 �'��e6tc�ti, G1d�onds �flle� B� ENCROACHMENT L,ea,f6-: SE / -S 3-�Ta7M-k3EIJM This ENCROACIiMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and H ul3 P— .("Owner[s]'), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 Code. AGREEMENT ("'Agreement") is ,entered into between the of the Edmonds Community Development 1. The Property. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at -/23 Z 1,1 b A\J 614 UE 50LI'(T--i- , within the City of Edmonds, Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number 49 V 5 1-18L' G 10,123 e , and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Business owner, "U L7 hi rnmilso-) is the business owner of that certain real property noted above. 2. The Easement. The City currently owns an existing easement over, under, and across Owner's property for street, alley; sidewalk, (other which is described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. The Encroachment. The City hereby covenants 4nd agrees and grants its permission to Owner or Business Owner to allow I-A4 i IEL I 4Z� S7: f 2IJ6-AE S . to remain in a portion of the City right-of-way/easement. A plat map showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The encroachment shall be installed and maintained in a safe and sanitary condition at the sole cost, risk, and responsibility of the owner and its successors in interest. b. The Owner shall agree at all times to indemnify and hold the City free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, damages or expenses resulting from the -1- construction, maintenance, use, repair or removal of the structure installed hereunder, including any loss, damage or expense arising out of (1) loss or damages to property and (2) injury to or death of persons. C. The Owner must remove or relocate any part of the encroachment within ten (10) days or such other time as specified in the notice after receipt of it from the City Engineer, or the City Engineer may cause such work to be done and the reasonable cost thereof shall constitute a lien upon the property. d. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected by city's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachment structure. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. 5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial means and addressed as follows: If to the City: City Engineer City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 If to the Owner: rv7p-61U,sco which addresses may be changed .from time to time by providing notice to the other party in the manner described above. 6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. Any waiver by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement. -2- 7. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision. 8. Capacity. Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s) thereby bind such party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this day of " C , 20 0/ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH This day, personally appeared before me, to me known to. a the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing document and that (he/she/they) 11L signed the same as (his/her/their) � S and voluntary act and deed;.for ihe: uses and purposes therein mention -, . .:'::ss'°,�.�A t Public 'I- '*b t� a Typed or Printed Name i1 L rh,o• My Commission expires: >,� �;° F ;VASE, A r��Pb7tMIMI+'1 CITY OF EDMONDS By, T ENGINEERING DIVISION G:ISHAMTEW\BU1LDINGU4ANMUT1En=wAAgr«.doc — 3 — RTSQ :03E27N23 -SE APN :00 4548 001 023 00 O1dParcel :4548 001 023 00 02 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Easement Census :Tract:505.00 Block:4 Neighborhood Code :500 MapGrid:454 F5 Zoning :Bc Zoning Rest Actual Use :Whse Storage Building Name :Jim Manning Neon Signs Land Use :492 Misc,Transportation Services Subdivision/Plat :Gepharts 1St Add To Edmonds Legal :GEPHARTS 1ST ADD TO EDMONDS BLK 001 :D-00 - ALL LOTS 23 & 24 V01:5 Page :43 EX��,B�T C QUARTER SE 23- .I 27 oo 1-038. V i EL CAPI TAN (A COND 6782 4-082 4-090 ( opt coo VIEW R 3 4-051 4-046 F;NwF}-FI(J�� i�� +rHH+�H{/+/N# +H i 44+H4H44.4 +K�, +H+Ff+14 +H 8., 4-054 j A6 . "A 4-049 i of ED Af0 RECEIVED _ ® `_ AUG 2 0 2001 BUILDING DEPT. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERNAME: HLA6jH Phone 2o6• PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS: CO o ( � �-TWA BUSINESS NAME for Commerical applications: 98/O/ ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: ' '2 D AUe�vt46F Sot�,77-1 *************************************************************************************** Describe the portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area to be utilized (i.e., overhead space of sidewalk, 10 foot City utility easement along north property line, etc): GA-NOP/&-3 e-,-Mrla P3l _i r' �; nt= ►,� ►XI _k' �J Describe the type of encroachment or use desired (i.e., fence 6 feet by 150 feet, awning 3 feet wide by 7 feet Specify the length of time for use (i.e. awning for life of building, espresso cart for summer months, etc.), NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature and that no vested right is granted. INDEMNITY.- The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense or any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the application understands that the City shall be provided a Certificate of Insurance to indemnity and hold harmless the City of Edmonds from all claims and/or property damage, and naming the City of Edmonds as an additional insured. CODE APPLICATION: By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70 of the nds Co munity Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as skt forth i ull and this application and permits therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter. SIGNA TY OWNER TE PcD Encroachho. docj lg 10/00 CRITERIA OF PERMIT APPROVAL The applicant shall follow the noted conditions on the building permit. For applications that do not require a building permit the following criteria shall be maintained at all times. ➢ Provide safe pedestrian travel for sidewalk encroachments. Maintain a clear zone of 44 inches minimum. See definition of clear zone below. ➢ Exterior light fixtures, banners and flags must be a minimum of 7 feet above City right-of-way. ➢ Maintain clear landings on the exterior side of all required exit doors of 44 inches or no less than width of door, measured toward the street. ➢ No projections into City alleys are permitted unless the projection exceeds 15 feet above pavement surface. ➢ Do not block illumination from City light fixtures or hang objects from City light standards. ➢ Architectural projections from buildings must be approved by the Design Board and conform to Uniform Building Code requirements. A building permit shall be required for such projections. ➢ Maintain 3 feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts and valves. ➢ Bistro dining tables and chairs must be placed in accordance with City Ordinance No. 3293. ➢ Merchandise racks, espresso carts; flower planters, benches must not be located within the "clear zone". ➢ Ramps require a separate building permit and must conform to UBC standards. Clear Zone Definition: Clear Zone refers to an area 7 feet in height and 44 inches in width providing a level, safe walking surface along the public sidewalk (i.e. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree grates or newspaper stands toward place of business and from the ground up to a height of 7 feet ------------------DEPARTMENT APPROVALS ---FOR CITY USE ONLY ------------------- Planning Division Approved Bye elf— ADB# WO ` {'OV Date TJD Jd 1 Remarks or Comments: Public Works Approved By Date GO- 5�� o J Remarks or Comments: Engineering Division Approved By e!�-W Bond Date Remarks or Comments: M� ft 5 NOi-lp bwow IM—Eb VO-uo- Wu pm*) 24 (;You Certificate of Insurance Verified ByDate 40/z8/6 / Easement Agreement sent to City Clerk for recording Date ENCROACHMENT PERMIT# ISSUANCE DATE i 11 /d RELEASED BY BUILDING PERMIT # 4MI-01141,C11 RECORDING # Encroachho.docj lg 10/00 ACORD CERTIFICAV OF LIABILITY INSU NCE DATE(MWDD/YY) ITM 06/06/2001 PRODUCER (425)827-7400 FAX (425)827-7402 McDonald Insurance Group Inc ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 416 6 t h St S ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. PO Box 3089 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Kirkland, WA 98083-3089 INSURED Hugh S. Ferguson INSURER A: Transcontinental Insurance Company INSURER B: 601 Union St., Suite 5523 INSURERC: Seattle, WA 98101 INSURERD: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MWDD/YY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY B1001040664 05/16/2001 05/16/2002 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 100,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE F_X I OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ A PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 300,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ POLICY PRO- JECT LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ - - - GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR D CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY TORY LIMITS I ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DiSG'%SE - EA 1-111PLOYCE W E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS T IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE CITY OF EDMONDS IS NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, City of Edmonds Building Division BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY 121 5 t h Ave N OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. Edmonds, WA 98020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE K David Tucker ACORv CERTIFICA OF LIABILITY INSU NCB OP ID RGU-1 DATE NY) 04/20/01 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Bellevue Western, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE dba : Kibble & Prentice HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P.O. Box 3467 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Bellevue WA 98009-3467 Phone:425-454-2445 Fax:425-646-9616 INSURED INSURER A: St Paul Fire and Marine Ins Co INSURER B: Kemper Insurance Co INSURERC: Ferguson Construction, Inc. - P.O. BOX 80867 Seattle WA 98108-0867 INSURERD: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. I SR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE MM/DD/YY POLICY EXPIRATION DATE MM/DD/YY LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY KKO8400226 06/01/00 06/01/01 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50,000 CLAIMS MADE 7 OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 X Wa Stop Gap PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1 , 000 , 000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2 , 000 , 000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2 , 000 , 000 POLICY X LOC j ECT A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO KK08400226 06/01/00 06/01/01 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 1000000 X BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS RECEIVE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS APR 2 3 2001 DIVISION PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY ENGINEERING AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ ANY AUTO $ AUTO ONLY: AGG EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5 , 000 , 000 A X OCCUR CLAIMSMADE KKO8400226 06/01/00 06/01/01 AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000 $ DEDUCTIBLE X RETENTION $ 10 , 000 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY TORY LIMITS ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE --.EA EMPLOYEE$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER B Excess Umbrella 3SR 014 782-00 06/01/00 06/01/01 Limit/occ 4,000,000 aggreate 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS The City of Edmonds, its officers, agents, and employees are added as additional insured with respect to temporary shoring work performed by the Named Insured on their behalf. nn R5NISE CERTIFICATE HOLDER y I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: A CANCELLATION EDMONO2 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL 1DOEGMEMAIL _30 DAYS WRITTEN City of Edmonds NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT ALL Attn: Lyle Chrisman 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Pamm Jardine ACORD 26-S (7/97) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: 0/ ADDRESS OF PUBLIC 11SE: /22 2/ d Qz2e PROPERTY OWNER:' M, PERMIT #:,,2m/ ONCE YOUR REVIEW IS COMPLETE, PLEASE ROUTE TO THE NEXT DIVISIONIDEPARTMENT ON THE LIST. PLEASE ROUTE IN THE ORDER SHOWN PLANNING DIVISION Date Stamp Received: I'PLIC WORKS Date Stamp Received: • ENGINEERING DIVISION Date Stamp Received: OCT 8 - 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION DS ADMINISTRATION Date Stamp Received: APPROVAL SIGNATURES AND REMARKS OR COMMENTS ARE TO BE MADE UNDER THE "DEPARTMENT APPROVALS" SECTION ON THE PERMIT. RAengrWormsTricroachment permit routing r ! CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT F 0 Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering St. 189 MAY 2 2 ,99% May 23, 1996 ENGINEERING Harold and Carolee Hopper 530 Bell Street, Suite 1000 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Lease for Parking for the Uses at 131 - 2nd Avenue South Code Enforcement File # ZE-93-107 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hopper: 60e-bV F-y—r BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Thank you for your response to my April 24, 1996 letter which you delivered on May 3, 1996. The sketch you provided in your letter dated May 2, 1996 shows that the insurance portion of the structure is 60 feet by 60 feet, or 3600 square feet. In your letter you state, "We and the city have always considered one parking space for every 800 square feet of office space to meet code." My understanding is that you have asked city staff how many spaces would be needed for an insurance office with no on -site customer service and were told one space per 800 square feet office area. I show no record in the file of the number of spaces being analyzed and a set number of required parking spaces being given. Though I understand from your letter that on -site customer service is not a large part of the insurance business, still, customers do come on -site and the large "entrance" sign on the north of the building is obviously not intended only for employees of,the business. Therefore, we have to consider the business to have on -site customer service. To make sure that we were not requiring an extraordinarily high number of parking spaces, I have researched what textbooks recommend and what other cities require. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publishes "Trip Generation, a textbook used to determine parking requirements. Using the ratios they have developed, and considering the size of the insurance office, the average office of the same size would have 12 parking spaces, with a low end of 3 spaces and a high end of 72 spaces. Single tenant office buildings have less variations, with an average of 12 spaces, a low end of 6 spaces, and a high end of 20 spaces. I also telephoned several nearby cities to see how many parking spaces they required for insurance offices. Everett requires one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, or 9 spaces for an office your size. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Harold and Carolee Hopper May 23, 1996 Page 2 Bothell requires one space per 300 square feet of gross floor area, or 12 spaces for an office your size. Lynnwood distinguishes between offices offering on -site customer services and those that do not, and requires one space per 200 square feet for on -site customer services and one space per 300 square feet for no on -site services, in both instances with a minimum of 10 spaces. For an office your size, that would result in 12 to 18 spaces required. Judging from the number of parking spaces required in other jurisdictions, and the fact that customers do occasionally require on -site service, it appears that requiring one space per 400 square feet of office space is proper, if not lenient, and the required nine spaces is the most appropriate number of spaces. In regards to your proposal to provide the required two spaces for the sign/warehouse use inside the building at 131 - 2nd Avenue S., Gordy Hyde has reviewed the site plan for the two parking spaces and he has no problem with the plan. When you dropped off your letter on May 3 we had spoken about the "fee -in -lieu" of parking option. I have checked and determined that you would fall under the conversion fee level, rather than new construction, which would only require a fee of $2,100 per parking space. You also requested a six-month extension of time in order to find parking spaces to lease. While we realize it can be challenging to find parking, judging from your finding two parking options within three weeks after the Order to Correct was issued, and because we have been working with you for a couple of years now, we feel an additional three weeks is a reasonable extension of time. In order to adequately correct the violation, by 5:00 p.m. June 14, 1996, please provide for the required parking by doing one of the following: 1. Submit an acceptable lease agreement (in recordable form) for the required parking in a parking lot that meets City codes. 2. Submit an acceptable lease agreement (in recordable form) for the required parking and, if it is pr6posed to be in a lot that does not meet City codes, also submit an application for a building permit to upgrade the parking lot to City codes and construct the parking lot as required. 3. If the parking will be provided adjacent to 131 - 2nd Avenue S., submit a complete application for a building permit for a permanent parking lot and construct the parking lot as required. Harold and Carolee Hopper May 23, 1996 Page 3 4. Pay the "fee -in -lieu" of parking of $2,100 for each of the nine required spaces for a total of $18,900. Please note that a lack of action by the aforementioned date may result in the issuance of a Notice of Civil Violation, as stated in the Order to Correct Violation. The Notice of Civil Violation will assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, M.E�eg Gruwell Code Enforcement Officer cc: Mayor Fahey Paul Mar, Community Services Director Gordy Hyde, Engineering Department Jeff Wilson, Planning Department ZE-93-107 890 199 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering October 19, 1995 Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Non -Conforming Parking Lot @ 131 2nd Avenue South Dear Mr. Hopper: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR RECeivelc) Ecr 19 199s �'lNFERING The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the status of the permit application on file with the Building Division for a parking lot. Since this is a violation case the permit application is valid for six months and is due to expire on November 19, 1995 (date of permit submittal 5/19/95). The significance of this expiration date is that the violation must be completely resolved or fines shall be imposed as required by the Civil Penalties Ordinance. Since your request for appeal to an Engineering Division interpretation has been denied, and it appears no other appeal process is available to you, the approved parking lot must be completed (via the issuance of the permit) and/or a valid parking lease agreement approved (in order to resolve the violation) by November 19, 1995. Also, the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage has expired (October, 10, 1995) so removal of the storage items must also be completed by aforementioned deadline. If you have any questions please feel free to contact the applicable division. We understand that you have a future development proposal, however, the current violation must be resolved by November 19, 1995. Thank you, 60" Jeannine L. Graf Building Official cc: Ken Matson L,-<i'ty Engineer Code Enforcement Officer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 _ 199 _ 0 • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX )206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works . Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering September 15, 1995 Ken Matson P.O. Box 234 Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Staff Decision on ADB 95-20 Dear Mr. Matson: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The Engineering Division is unwilling to grant the waiver requested for the driveway access unless certain conditions are met. We will allow placement of the driveway curb cut north of your property only if you can obtain an access easement from the property owner to the north and you realign your access road to the parking area to center on the driveway curb cut. The adjoining property owner should be informed how this could impact future development of his property. Contact should be made with the Planning Division to determine what impact the easement could have on future development of the property to the north. Repainting or restriping on -street parking is obviously dependent on what is currently there and how your curb cut is modified. If the curb cut is modified, you will be required to paint the curb within five feet of the access yellow to designate no parking. If you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer c: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator HOPPER.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 0 0 AUG 18 1995 ,\IAA WkLe-81?- - CITY E,06W)a!��- E NG I N E E;Fl iN U w or, Or— a. lfflmvwx� "I i I ME If A—.111—WAIN111�0W IMAROJIMARMArli - RA Two M.6-[ fps IEfL .1�� t7rz r-PED, 7 '� PA/07P AC- JAJ Dl eA' 72� 0, , 2'`-- ALJF- . 5 d �2 rI AALIEf, 67. 05 UI CO5LY WE C.li r=kLF-kzjTl` : 1&� 27OJ6 de 5,? p ZS6�-F ScpP� -aF 7bL5 ov�2- M 71xJ� , ,4,2✓z �3� u Zy 57 � a? J ZAj /► 77 7�� . GUI r)&S7i,Zz `t Jy :n� G/ T4/ / 1?X-5 i MEMORANDUM June 13, 1995 TO: Rob Chave, Planning Manager FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Project status for parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S. (CU-94-30� Rob, I have attached numerous memos and letters that have been sent to the applicant, his engineer, and the Planning Division regarding this address. Please note that the original Conditional Use for this property expired in 1989, and in fact, the terms of the CU granted in 1988 never have been met. Ken Mattson, Mr. Hopper and Steve Bullock met with Bob Alberts and myself on July 27, 1994. The purpose of that meeting was to reach agreement as to the dispensation of this issue. As a result of that meeting, I wrote the letter of July 28. Neither Mr. Hopper nor Mr. Mattson responded to my letter. The letter sent by Steve Bullock to Mr. Hopper on August 5 indicated that the parking lot would be considered temporary. Thus the site would be subject to the conditions of the Conditional Use permit. Information should have been provided to the Engineering Division per my July 28 letter. The Engineering Division never received that information. The October 1, 1994, deadline, agreed upon in the meeting and set forth in the letter was never met. The Engineering Division has never received written updates on the project as requested in the October 6 and December 7 memos. In February 1995, Mr. Mattson applied to the ADB on behalf of his client. The Engineering Division sent a letter to the applicant's engineer on February 16, 1995, indicating a number of revisions needed to bring the plan into compliance with code. No response was received. On May 2, 1 again requested a written status update from your Division. Ann Bullis responded with the attached memo. New drawings, which were incompletely revised and unacceptable, were received on May 19. The revised plans were merely red -lined markups made by Mr. Mattson over the signed stamp of a professional engineer. I have discussed this issue with the engineer and he was not aware that these revisions had been made. There is some question now as to the legality of unauthorized revision of drawings prepared by a licensed professional. That remains a matter between Mr. Mattson and the engineer. HOPPERKDOC C1 The Engineering Division remains unclear as to how this proposal is allowed to continue in this state of non-compliance. We would like to know what the status of the enforcement action is and what is now the timetable to have this address brought into compliance with the ECDC. I have personally expended a great deal of time on this issue. I find it very frustrating that repeated requests for status reports and updates are inadequately responded to or unanswered entirely. cc: Paul Mar, Community Services Director HOPPERXDOC 8 go . 1 9 y- CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering June 1, 1995 GeoDimensions 1601 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Ray Miller LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Mailed 6/12/95 Subject: Proposed parking lot improvement at 131 2nd Ave. S. (ADB-95-20) Dear Ray: On February 15, 1995, the attached letter was sent to you regarding revisions necessary for further review of the subject site plan. On May 19, 1995, the attached plans were submitted for review. The plans cannot be reviewed as submitted. The staff has a long-standing review procedure for proposals such as this and those procedures must be followed to allow for timely permit processing and adherence to appropriate construction standards. This project.is in enforcement review at the present time and to minimize potential penalty, staff recommends that policy is adhered to and that revisions are made as quickly as possible. As indicated in the February 15 letter, when the revisions are completed, please resubmit four (4) sets of plans with the earlier enclosed red -lines so that the Engineering Division can complete its review. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. erely, .ter c ordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator GCH/sf Attachments cc: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator �e4e,-1 Wal r HOPPER2.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 11 s .i CITY OF EDMONDS. 250 - 5TH AVE. N.. EDMONDS, WA 96020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planninn • Parks and FlArmatinn • FnninParinn 890-19C�v February 16, 1995 Mailed 2/16/95 Ray Miller GeoDimensions 1601 - 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Subject: Proposed parking lot improvement at 131 - 2nd Ave. S. (ADB-95-20) Dear Ray: The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject site plans. The following comments/corrections apply. • Show proposed contours. • Provide parking dimensions • Show how retention pond area will be permanently fixed for storm water storage. • Provide a safe conveyance overflow to CB #2. • Provide details of erosion control measures and show where they will be located. • Provide minimum of 1.0' of freeboard. • Provide specifications on seeding mixture and planting instructions for grass -lined Swale. • Construct a speed bump or asphalt berm to direct flow from Swale to pond. • Realign driveway to match entrance to parking lot. This will require relocation of power pole. • Reconfigure parking stalls accessing off alley to be perpendicular to alley. • Show how on -street parking will be reconfigured and repainted. Because I expect to be out of the office from February 21 through February 24, 1995, please direct questions, especially drainage questions, to Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans, together with the enclosed red -lines, so that the Engineering Division can complete its review. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. ! Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator! Enclosures cc: Sharon Nolan "Q�: � e Walker HOPPER.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Janan • .w MEMORANDUM February 10, 1995 TO: John Bissell, Associate Planner FROM: Gordy Hyde, de, Engineering En ineerin Coordinato SUBJECT: Comments on March 1. 1995 ADB agenda items from February 10 CDRC meeting The following comments apply to the submittals: ADB-95-13 It should be noted that the design dimensions for the angle parking stalls are for overhang type stalls. Right-of-way construction permit will be required as will City Engineer's approval of final engineered site plans. ADB-95-15 Provide dimension for southerly end of driveway. Compliance with all applicable storm drainage ordinances will be required, to include addressing storm water quality and quantity issues. College Place traffic mitigation fees will be collected at time of building permit issuance. ADB-95-17 Parking stall dimensions need to be provided. High traffic load driveway and right-of-way construction permit will be required as will City Engineer's approval of final engineered site plans. Compliance with all applicable storm drainage ordinances will be required, to include addressing storm water quality and quantity issues. ✓ ADB-95-20 Driveway curb cut will be required to be relocated to align with parking lot entrance. This may require relocation of existing power pole. Right of way construction permit will be required as will City Engineer's approval of final engineered site plans. Compliance with all applicable storm drainage ordinances will be required, to include addressing storm water quality and quantity issues. Parking spaces off alley be reconfigured to be perpendicular to be accessible from two way alley. It should be noted that stalls 8 through 14 are designed as overhang type stalls. MAR95.DOC • LI Additionally, the Engineering Division would like to have a written response from the Planning Division regarding the status of last month's application for Doug's Lynnwood Mazda. A quotation from last month's memo follows: ADB-95-6 The Engineering Division is opposed to any permits or approvals granted to this address until the existing unpermitted development is brought into compliance with the ECDC. The Engineering Division has repeatedly requested enforcement action be initiated on this property with no results or response. Drainage system, if installed on the property has never been approved, nor have required frontage improvements been constructed. The Engineering Division has no comments on the other submittals. MAR95. DOC f C July 28, 2994 Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Your parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S. (CU-94-30) Dear Mr. Hopper: On July 27, 1994 a meeting was held with Bob Alberts and Gordy Hyde of the City Engineering Division, Steve Bullock of the City Planning Division, Ken Mattson, and yourself. Based upon that meeting, you agreed that, if the decision between yourself and the Planning Division is that the parking lot is temporary, then Engineering will agree to the following: • The parking lot can be used as is until September 30, 1994. • Contingent upon short-term development options occurring, you would submit the following information to the City by October 1, 1994: a) Drainage calculations for the parking lot, based upon a 25 year storm with release calculated for a 10 year event. b) Paving plan for paving the driving aisles including the entry. c) Landscape design. d) Schedule for construction of the above items. If the decision between yourself and the Planning Division is that the parking lot is permanent at this time then the Engineering Division needs to review a development plan with storm drainage calculations, grading and paving plan, and a landscape plan as soon as possible. Your signature below confirms your agreement with the above timetable. Thank you for your cooperation and concern in this matter. Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator cc: Planning Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner HOPPER.DOC 890-199 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering August 5, 1994 Mr. Hopper 520 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 re: A Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Parking Lot Dear Mr. Hopper: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Ultimately, all parties involved, including the City, would like to see the subject property developed to its fullest potential. We understand that you are actively pursuing opportunities which will allow you to proceed with a development like this. If redevelopment of the entire site will occur in the near future, the city is not adverse to supporting a temporary parking lot. But, our concern is the same as it always has been, and that is that if these opportunities do not materialize, the temporary lot must be improved to standards for a permanent lot. With this understanding, the City will support a Conditional Use Permit for a temporary parking lot at 130 2nd Avenue South for the period of one year as allowed by code. The City will also support a one year extension of that Conditional Use Permit if the applicant can show that it is needed to complete a funding package to redevelop the entire site. In any case, at the end of two years, if the site has not been redeveloped, the parking lot must be developed to City standards for permanent parking lots. This arrangement includes all the conditions agreed to at the meeting held July 27, 1994 with Robert Alberts, Gordy Hyde, Ken Mattson, and yourself. You will also be responsible for complying with the requirements of the original ADB approval for landscaping. Please note, assuming that the Hearing Examiner approves the requested permit, any extension of a Conditional Use Permit must be requested before the permit expires. A Conditional Use Permit is valid for one year from the date the Hearing Examiners decision is issued. Also, if the Hearing Examiner approves the Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage and you act on that approval, the Design Board will need to review that proposal for the design of the fence and any proposed screening. Should the Hearing Examiner approve the Conditional Use Permit, a condition requiring your signature on the line below would confirm your agreement with the • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan terms discussed above. Thank you for your cooperation in working with the City in correcting the situation on your property. Sin rely, ST PHEN LLOCK Assistent Planner Cc: Engineering Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner Attachments Engineering Division letter dated July 29,1994 Approved: H. A. Hopper Date MEMORANDUM October 6, 1994 TO: Planning Division FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S. (CU-94-30) for Hopper The conditions of the attached letter have not been met as of this date. Because the conditions have not been met, the Engineering Division recommends that enforcement action be reinitiated on the subject property. Please keep the Engineering Division apprised of the progress on this action. HOPPERMOC MEMORANDUM December 7, 1994 TO: Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Project status It would be informative to me and necessary for completeness of our files that the Engineering Division receive a written update on the status of the following projects • Clay Enterprises parking lot situation on 212th St. S.W. • Hopper parking lot situation on 2nd Ave. S. It is my impression that these projects are both in enforcement. Is that correct? PROMATMOC February 15, 1995 GeoDimensions 1601 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Ray Miller Subject: Proposed parkin. Iq of improvement at 131 2nd Ave. S. (ADB-95-20.) Dear Ray: The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject site plans. The following comments/corrections apply. • Show proposed contours. • Provide parking dimensions • Show how retention pond area will be permanently fixed for stormwater storage. • Provide a safe conveyance overflow to CB #2. • Provide details of erosion control measures and show where they will be located. \Provide minimum of 1.0' of freeboard. • Provide specifications on seeding mixture and planting instructions for grass lined swale. • Construct a speed bump or asphalt berm to direct flow from swale to pond. • Realign driveway to match entrance to parking lot. This will require relocation of power pole. Reconfigure parking stalls accessing off alley to be perpendicular to alley. • Show how on -street parking will be reconfigured and repainted. Because I expect to be out of the office from February 21 through February 24, please direct questions, especially drainage questions to Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans together with the enclosed red -lines, so that the Engineering Division can complete its review. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator encl cc: Sharon Nolan HOPPER.DOC 0 MEMORANDUM May 2, 1995 TO: Rob Chave, Planning Manager FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Project status It would be informative to me and necessary for completeness of our files that the Engineering Division receive a written update on the status of the following projects: • Doug's Lynnwood Mazda properties on SR-99. The Engineering Division has not received a response from the memo sent to you on March 22, 1995, regarding this property. • Hopper parking lot situation on 2nd Ave. S. The applicant has never met the terms of agreement from a meeting held in July, 1995, though he has applied for ADB review. The Engineering Division approval for the Conditional Use was conditioned upon the applicant meeting terms of that agreement. It is my impression that these projects are both in enforcement. Is that correct? PROJSTAT.DOC L SAY 3 i995 MEMORANDUM ENGINEERtt46 DATE: May 2, 1995 TO: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator FROM: Ann Bullis, Code Enforcement Officer �e— RE: Hopper Parking Lot and Doug's Lynnwood Mazda Parking Lot This memo is in response to your memo dated May 2, 1995. As you should be aware, Mr. Hopper went to the ADB on April 5, 1995 for construction of a permanent parking lot and the last City correspondence stated that plans must be submitted for permit to resolve this matter. We have recently discovered that the Conditional Use Permit for the temporary parking lot at Doug's Lynnwood Mazda expired. An enforcement file has been created and action will be taken in due process. June 1, 1995 GeoDimensions 1601 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Ray Miller Subject: Proposed parking lot improvement at 131 2nd Ave. S. (ADB-95-20) Dear Ray: On February 15, the attached letter was sent to you regarding revisions necessary for further review of the subject site plan. On May 19, the attached plans were submitted for review. The plans cannot be reviewed as submitted. The staff has a long-standing review procedure for proposals such as this and those procedures must be followed to allow for timely permit processing and adherence to appropriate construction standards. This project is in enforcement review at the present time, and to minimize potential penalty, staff recommends that policy is adhered to and that revisions are made as quickly as possible. As indicated in the earlier letter, when the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans with the earlier enclosed red -lines, so that the Engineering Division can complete its review. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator encl cc: Sharon Nolan HOPPER2.130C CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: Ja4enn ll, Hearing Examiner From: J U N 1 6 1994 Stullock Assistant Planner ENGINEERING Date: JUNE 10, 1994 File: CU-94-30 Hearing Date, Time, And Place: June 16, 1994, At 9:00 AM, Plaza Room - Edmonds Library 650 Main Street TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 2 A. Application.......................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Description of Proposal........................................................................................................................ 2 C. Recommendations................................................................................................................................ 2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS....................................................................... 3 A. Site Description.................................................................................................................................... 3 B. History ................................................................................................................................................. 3 C. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance........................................................... 5 D. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC).............................................................................................................. 7 E. Technical Committee........................................................................................................................... 7 III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS ............................................................................ A. Request for Reconsideration................................................................................................................. 8 B. Appeals................................................................................................................................................ 8 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL.......................................................................................................8 V. APPENDICES....................................................................................................................... 8 VI. PARTIES OF RECORD....................................................................................................... 8 CU-94-30.DOC / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report • H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 2 of 8 I. INTRODUCTION A. Application 1. Applicant: H. A. Hopper (see Attachment 2). 2. Site Location: 131 2nd Avenue South (see Attachment 1). 3. Request: A Conditional Use Permit to allow the applicant to continue to maintain a temporary parking lot on the subject property, as well as establish outdoor storage as a permitted use on the site. 4. Review Process: Conditional Use Permit; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. 5. Maior Issues: a. Compliance with Title 15 (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 15.15.030 (ENVIRONMENT - Beautification and Urban Design) and Chapter 15.30 (DOWNTOWN PARKING AND DEVELOPMENT). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.50.010 (COMMUNITY BUSINESS - Uses). c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17.50.080 (OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS - Temporary Parking Lots). d. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.95 (PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION) and Chapter 20.12 (LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES). e. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.05 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS). B. Description of Proposal Located on the northeast corner of 2nd Avenue South and James Street, the subject property is developed with a commercial building on approximately one half of the site with the remainder of the property used for providing parking and outdoor storage for the businesses in the building. The graveled area on the northwest corner of the property, which provides parking for the building, received a Conditional Use permit for a temporary parking lot in 1988. Now, the applicant is requesting another Conditional Use Permit for a temporary parking lot because the first one expired. Also, outdoor storage is not allowed in the BC zone without a Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage. One of the tenants of the commercial building is using the area along the alley for outdoor storage. Either, the use must stop, or a Conditional Use Permit allowing outdoor storage must be granted. C. Recommendations Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Parking Lot, requiring instead that the parking lot be developed to permanent standards. In the matter of the Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage, based on the statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. A solid fence, six feet high, shall be constructed around the entire area to be used as outdoor storage; 2. The Architectural Design Board shall review and approve the permanent parking lot and the outdoor storage area for compliance with ECDC Chapters 20.10 and 20.12. CU-94-30.DOC / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 3 of 8 However, should the Hearing Examiner find support for the temporary parking lot application, staff would recommend, as a minimum, that the following additional conditions be imposed: 1. The parking facility shall be designed in accordance with ECDC Sections 17.50.090.B (TEMPORARY PARKING LOTS - Improvements), 18.95.020 (PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION - Requirements), and 18.30 (DRAINAGE). 2. This Conditional Use Permit shall be considered the second Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Parking Lot granted on the site, and no more extensions or Conditional Use Permits will be allowed on this property for temporary parking lots. 3. The applicant shall post both performance and maintenance landscape bonds to ensure the property is maintained in accordance with City standards. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Description 1. Site Development, Neighboring Development, And Zoning: a) Facts: (1) Size: The subject property is approximately 16,800 square feet in size. It has approximately 142-feet of frontage along 2nd Avenue South and 120-feet along James Street. Vehicular access is provided off of both 2nd Ave. S. and the alley to the east of the property (see Attachment 3). (2) Land Use: (a) An Insurance Agency and a Sign Company occupy the commercial building located on the site. (b) Associated parking for the above mentioned businesses are also located on the subject property. (c) One of the businesses uses a portion of the outside area for outdoor storage. (d) The remainder of the site is developed and maintained as a temporary Parking lot. (3) Subject Property Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Community Business - BC (see Attachment 1). (4) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject property slopes gently from the east to the west and has some ornamental vegetation located along the south and west property lines. (5) Surrounding Development and Zoning: All the surrounding properties are zoned with the same BC zoning. A large multi -unit residential building is located across the street to the south. On both the east and the west sides of the subject property, mixed use development has occurred. Directly to the north, is another vacant lot which is used for parking (see Attachment 1). B. History 1. Previous Reviews and Approvals a) Facts: (1) In 1988, with file # CU-25-88, the current property owner made their initial Conditional Use Permit request for a temporary parking lot and a wholesale CU-94-30.DOC / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 4 of 8 warehouse operation (see Attachments 4 and 5). Their request was granted. as submitted wiih the following submitted elements and conditions: • The applicant shall comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. (Ultimately, this included landscaping along the south and west property lines.) • The applicant shall provide and install curbs, gutters and sidewalks along the entire street frontage of James Street and 2nd Ave S. as it fronts the subject property. • All underground fuel tanks on the north side of the building shall be removed. • The parking lot is proposed to be an asphalt center driveway with gravel spaces. • There should be no excessive overflow of parking, but if that should occur, it is the applicant's intention to clean off the vegetation on the northeast section of the lot to provide for overflow parking. • The applicant indicated in their Conditional Use Permit application that they had just obtained a preliminary ADB approval for the redevelopment of the entire site into a commercial/residential building. It was their intention to begin development around 1990. In the mean time, they would like to continue to use the existing commercial building but need the parking the temporary lot would provide. (2) The requirements of the Architectural Design Board have never been complied with. Trees have been planted along the west and south property lines, but none of the remaining required landscaping has been installed Due to the City's mishandling of the enforcement case for that item, the maintenance bond for the landscaping has been released. (3) No stripping or other identification is provided to identify the number or location of parking stalls. (4) The parking lot is completely graveled. No asphalt center driveway was ever installed. (5) Parking in the overflow area of the initial proposal is no longer the exception, but the rule. On every inspection made of this property since the application of the conditional use permit, the overflow area has been used to accommodate parking for between 5-10 cars. (6) A new business moved into the subject property after the initial conditional use permit was granted. They have initiated an activity, outdoor storage, for which a conditional use permit is required but has never been obtained. (7) Although a new business moved into the existing building, no action has ever been taken on the preliminary ADB review. b) Conclusions: (1) Any new conditional use permit should require compliance with the initial Architectural Design Board conditions, or require a new ADB review. (2) Since outdoor storage is a permitted activity which requires a conditional use permit to occur, this use must either cease, or obtain a Conditional Use Permit. (3) Since the site has not been redeveloped as was initial anticipated, the site has been maintained in a temporary state for six years. CU-94-30.130C / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report • H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 5 of 8 C. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. Compliance with ECDC) Section 16.50.010 (COMMUNITY BUSINESS - Uses) a) Facts: (1) An Insurance Agency and a Sign Company occupy the commercial building located on the site. Both are permitted primary uses in the BC zone. (2) Associated parking for the above mentioned businesses are also located on the subject property. Parking for a primary use is a permitted secondary use in the BC zone. (3) The remainder of the site is developed and maintained as a temporary Parking lot. Temporary parking lots are a permitted use in the BC zone which requires a Conditional Use Permit. In 1988, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to allow a temporary parking lot. (4) One of the businesses uses a portion of the outside area for outdoor storage. Outdoor storage is a permitted use which requires a Conditional Use Permit in the BC zone. No Conditional Use Permit has been granted on this property to allow for outdoor storage. (5) All uses or activities in the BC zone must take place entirely within the buildings. b) Conclusion: (1) Either the associated parking needs to be developed to City standards for a permanent lot, or a Conditional Use Permit must be obtained for a temporary parking lot. (2) A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the outdoor storage to continue on the subject property. (3) To minimize the impact of outdoor storage in a zone that does not allow any outdoor activities without a conditional use permit, the applicant should carry on all outdoor storage activities within a solid fence. 2. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17.50.090 (OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS - Temporary Parking Lots). a) Facts: (1) Temporary parking lots require a Conditional Use Permit. The terms of this permit regarding time limits are: an initial conditional use permit of one year; possibility for a one year extension if requested before the initial conditional use permit expires; one additional two year extension through a conditional use permit review, but only if a public benefit will result. In no event shall a temporary narking lot be permitted to continue beyond four years from the date the initial conditional use permit is granted. (2) Improvements required of temporary parking lots are a durable, well -drained, dust - free and hard surface for the parking lot (3) Review of the temporary parking lot design will be done by the Architectural Design Board, and the applicant shall comply with any requirements of the Board as to signage, lighting, screening and landscaping. CU-94-30. DOC/ June 10, 1994 / Staff Report H. A Hopper Fite No. V-94-30 Page 6 of 8 (4) The current temporary parking lot has been in operation for six years from its initial approval in 1988. No extensions have ever been requested. (5) The existing commercial building is completely leased and is a viable economic use. Although it may not be the ultimate use of the property, it does not force redevelopment, and is not a temporary use. A parking lot is required to serve that building. Currently, the illegal temporary parking lot serves the commercial building. b) Conclusion: (1) The -temporary parking lot has been in operation for six years since the date of initial approval. Except for the first year allowed by the conditional use permit, the temporary use has been illegal. The use has already extended for a longer period of time than would be allowed to if it had received all applicable approvals, and therefore should not be granted any additional permits. (2) Typically, conditional use permits for temporary parking lots are granted on lots that are vacant or underdeveloped, to provide an interim use for the property as the property owner continues to pursue a final development proposal. Since the existing primary uses, an insurance agency and sign company, are not temporary, a temporary parking lot is not the proper means of handling their parking requirement. The parking lot should be improved to City standards for a permanent parking lot. 3. Compliance with Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.05 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS a) Fact: (1) ECDC Section 20.05 contains the review and approval criteria for a conditional use permit. According to the aforementioned code section, `No conditional use permit may be approved unless all the findings in this section can be made." The findings are as follows: • Comprehensive Plan - That the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Zoning Ordinance - That the proposed use, and its location, is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the zone district in which the use is to be located, and that the proposed use will meet all the applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. • Not Detrimental - That the use, as approved or conditionally approved, will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and to nearby private property or improvements unless the use is a public necessity. • Transferability - The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the conditional use permit shall run with the land or shall be personal. (2) The temporary parking lot does not comply with either the Zoning Ordinance or the Comprehensive Plan. While a more detailed discussion of the project's discrepancies with the Comprehensive Plan concerning the temporary parking lot will be provided in the forth coming section, the primary Zoning Ordinance inconsistencies relate to (1) the continuation of the temporary use for two years in excess of the maximum four year time period, (2) the lack of required improvements by both the ADB and the Engineering Department. CU-94-30.DOC / June 10, 1994 1 Staff Report H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 7 of 8 (3) With certain conditions, outdoor storage may be found to comply with both the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, as well as not detrimental. b) Conclusions: (1) The conditional use permit for a temporary parking lot should be denied because it does not comply with either the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. (2) The Conditional use permit for outdoor storage should be approved with conditions to ensure that it will not be detrimental. The conditional use permit for outdoor storage should be transferable. D. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC) 1. Compliance with Title 15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Section 15.15.030 (ENVIRONMENT - Beautification and Urban Design) and Chapter 15.30 (DOWNTOWN PARKING AND DEVELOPMENT) a) Facts: (1) ECDC Section 15.15.030 states that the City should strive to reduce development of poor quality and design and that parking lots should be better integrated with the community through coordination and street landscaping. (2) ECDC Section 15.30 states two relevant objectives for downtown parking and development, including the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas and the encouraging of an aesthetically pleasing business community consisting of people comforts, park like surroundings and de- emphasizing auto pollution and congestion. b) Conclusion: (1) While staff recognizes the importance of parking in the downtown area, the temporary parking lot maintained on the subject property runs contrary to policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan. If the parking lot were redeveloped to City standards for permanent parking lots, it would comply with these Comprehensive Plan policies. 2. Comprehensive Plan Designation a) Fact: The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property Commercial/Business. b) Conclusion: The proposed project is consistent with the Commercial/Business designation in the Comprehensive Plan. E. Technical Committee 1. Review by City Departments a) Facts: (1) The Engineering Department has indicated that they will require the parking lot to be paved, storm detention system installed, and installation of a new curb gutter and sidewalk. (2) The Public Works Department also indicates that new sidewalk must be constructed on frontage. (3) Comments and requirements placed on the project by City departments may be found in attachments 7 through 10. CU-94-30.130C / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report H. A Hopper File No. V-94-30 Page 8 of 8 b) Conclusion: The applicant must follow the requirements of the City departments as set forth in attachments 7 through 10. III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsiderations and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration Section 20. 100.0 10.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. B. Appeals Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' V. APPENDICES Attachments 1 through 9 are attached. 1. Vicinity / Zoning Map 2. Application 3. Site Plan 4. Hearing Examiner Decision on CU-25-88 5. Staff Report for CU-25-88 6. Comments from Engineering Division (3/l/94) 7. Comments from Fire Department (3/2/94) 8. Comments from Parks Department (3/2/94) 9. Comments from Public Works Department (3/1/94) VI. PARTIES OF RECORD Applicant Planning Division Engineering Division Fire Department Parks Department Public Works Department CU-94-30. DOC / June 10, 1994 / Staff Report v�*4r L ot% RM-24 r 11 " 3 ri vicinity Map Attachment 1 city of edmonds land use application ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ❑ COMP PLAN CHANGE ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9;CORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ HOME OCCUPATION ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMEND ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP ❑ REZONE ❑ SETBACK ADJUSTMENT ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ RESUBMITTAL FILE # FILE # e U- - 30 ZONE 0 DATE REC'D BY FEE RECEIPT # H ARING DATE HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ACTION. TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED APPEAL # Applicant �A r�, -�z - Phone !%� • i�.��1 Address Property Address or Location JI �=�'= ►-�' 1cvE=-��J.�cr��` -� `>�wZ� Property Owner - ('Pt-- Phone Address /%s'�' Agent 1 l'� f I� ,A)&4L P�ione �7�� • (4 (y Address �' ?� z; t 'i 1A5 (illy `�9DZo Tax Acc # � p - 001 - o-zo - Sec. Twp. Rng Legal Description ILL ��/ ��' G �'o '/v,*_ l eY wtTH L,T'5 2 ►, 17n oN �A�t✓ !�vLtsA, l �co -'P5 �'�=(_ ��(�/. r�.�! z"<� J,��t� L�ti'�/�iti`�T,�• Details of Projector Proposed Use %1(! c`- 4 (c�� : _ * �_ ' f ,,� A �,-y!-to, T-L:�J,kL QJJ4:(�- (J�i4>!1) reJ"C% � � ��('! 4LYii`�e-V 1,.� / (1(�• (° t?( /ice EL -PC 1-•1i0.!'D (:� �,f'< ''ter ��,u� Q,-liar✓1« t'•;' •�F- C;�u.- �< �a� r�-tom.- /��!,ICrN._ r�:.:i(t 4' 4J E Y/�-h7 G C'/Ll'// - '7! ii /li/i /J/ 1 j'i��//liJ E /� frA) A The undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, Including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or Infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/her/its permission fo( public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspect, n and posting att�rtdant to this application. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/OWNER/(GENT;o�— �h..1,?4 (7i%a al "... ) D B CD �-r LEV I I PLOT PLAN oNe wat e-s- 's Twemrf Aar o a ie a c. �110�.1 t lil SBctrio AVE.' 4 Lacr.c. Caxs+v't1oa� iAY�Q 01QII ta[} L, 21,3� 7F� G6A4cTy }ftA .kaTlau Ti TIE UN 4 �ni M AYamcs w.► EKrE , Yec iteewi er yaw.uv� canny, uY•�++tiin.,. Louata s 7L'wPoR.mf ! ; L('TIC.: ^ LPCdf WQJ•Y�iSa � � lsyr�S 0' e-,-)MOuq , WA• CITY OF EDMONDS 250 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE REARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF H.A. HOPPER FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. DECISION: The conditional use permit is granted subject to the conditions listed. INTRODUCTION TARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR RE�.,"iVED JUN 6 1988 PLAN""IG DEPT, FILE: CU-25-88 H.A. Hopper, 530 Bell Street, Edmonds, Washington 98020, (hz�rein- after referred to as Applicant), has requested approval of a conditional use permit for a wholesale warehouse and temporary parking at 131 Second Avenue S, in the city of Edmonds, Washington. A hearing on the request was held before the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds, Washington, on May 19, 1988. At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: Duane Bowman Planning Dept. City of Edmonds Edmonds, WA 98020 Ken Mattson P.O. Box 234 Edmonds, WA 98020 Dave Moore 126 - 3rd Avenue S Edmonds, WA 98020 At the hearing the following exhibits were submitted and were admitted as part of the official record of this Proceeding: Attachment 4 DECISION OF HE G EXAMINER RE: CU-25-88,3/88 Page 2 Exhibit 1 - Staff Report " 2. - Application to 3 - Legal Description 4 - Declarations " 5 - Site Plan 6 - Building Elevations After due consideration of the evidence presented by the appli- cant, and evidence elicited during the public hearing, the follow- ing Findings of Fact and Conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACTS 1. The Applicant has requested a conditional use permit for a wholesale warehouse and commercial temporary parking lot at 131 Second Avenue S, Edmonds, Washington. (Staff Report) 2. The property is located intersection of James Street 16,800 sq. feet. On site is building. (Bowman Testimony) on the northeast corner of the and Second Avenue S. It contains a 7,000 sq. foot office/warehouse 3. It is the intent of the Applicant to lease the western half of the existing building for a wholesale business. It is also the applicant's intent to construct a temporary commercial parking lot on the north side of the building. The lot will contain 13 spaces and will contain used for the wholesale business. (Bowman Testimony, Mattson Testimony) 4. The subject property is zoned BC for community business. (Staff Report) 5. The Edmonds Community Development Code, (ECDC) 16.50.010 (c)(1) requires that commercial parking lots developed in a community business zone require a conditional use permit. In addition, ECDC 16.50.010(c)(2) requires that wholesale uses also must have a conditional use permit. 5. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the City of Edmonds, the criteria as set forth in ECDC 20.05.010 must exist. Those criteria include: A. The proposed use must be consistent with the comprehensive plan of the City of Edmonds; DECISION OF HEAR'~ WAMINER RE: CU-25-88 6i3/88 Page 3 B. The proposed use and its location must be consis- tent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance in which the property is located; and C. The proposed use must not be significantly detri- mental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to nearby private properties or improvements. (ECDC) 6. The buildings on site have been used historically for commer- cial purposes. Included in its uses have been an automobile dealership, a publishing storage facility and an office space. It is the Applicant's request to convert the property to wholesale use in order that a tenant can receive, store and ship marble and granite to wholesale customers. Also, there will be an on -site office and a small retail showroom in the northwest corner of the existing building. (Exhibit 4) 7. In addition to the wholesale use for the building, the Applicant intends to develop a temporary commercial parking lot on site. The commercial parking lot will provide 9 spaces for office workers and 4 spaces for warehouse use. The total required parking on site is thirteen spaces which will be provided by the Applicant. (Exhibit 4) 8. The comprehensive plan map of the City of Edmonds designates the subject property as commercial business. (Staff Report) 9. The requested .use will not be detrimental to the public nor to nearby private properties or improvements. (Staff Report) 10. The City has recommended that the permit not be transferable. 11. The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds recommended approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1) Comply with all Architectural Design Board Require- ments. 2) Curbs, gutters, inside walks shall be installed along the entire street frontage of James Street and Second Avenue S. (Staff Report) DECISION OF HE EXAMINER RE: CU-25-88, 3/88 Page 4 12. The Planning Department representative submitted at the public hearing that in addition to the recommendations as set forth in the Staff Report the Applicant should also be required to remove underground fuel tanks that are located on the north side of the building. (Bowman Testimony) 13. A witness (Moore) requested information on the ingress and egress of the parking lot. He was informed that the traffic will access off Second Avenue S. (Moore Testimony, Mattson Testimony) 14. The parking lot is proposed to be an asphalt center driveway with gravel spaces. According to the Applicant there should be no excessive overflow of parking but, if that should occur, it is the Applicant's intention to clean off the vegetation on the northeast section of the lot to provide for overflow parking. (Mattson Testimony) CONCLUSIONS 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for a wholesale warehouse and temporary parking lot at 131 Second Avenue S, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 2. ECDC 16.50.010(c)(2,3) sale uses in the BC zone conditional use permits. require that parking lots and whole - such as the subject property require 3. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the City of Edmonds the criteria of 20.05.010 must be satisfied. With conditions that criteria is satisfied. 4. The requested conditional use permit is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds, and in particular provisions of ECDC 15.20.010. It is consistent in that it pro- vides a commercial development in the City of Edmonds that has historically been used to serve the needs of the City. 5. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds in that it creates a commercial development that is carefully located and designed to eliminate adverse impacts of the surrounding properties. 6. The requested conditional use permit is. consistent with.the purposes of the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds and in ' •' DECISION OF HEAR. ~;'-EXAMINER RE: CU-25-88 6/3/88 Page 5 particular for the purposes of community business zone as set forth in ECDC 16.50.000. It will reserve an area for warehouse space and office space and offer goods and services to the commu- nity. It will also allow for a convenient development pattern within an existing building. 7. The requested use will not be detrimental to the public nor to nearby private properties or improvements. 8. The permit shall not be transferable. nV TCTnW Based upon the preceding Findings of Facts and Conclusions, the testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, and upon the impressions of the Hearing Examiner at a site view, it is hereby ordered that the requested conditional use permit for the allowance of a wholesale warehouse operation and a temporary commercial parking lot at 131 Second Avenue S, Edmonds, Washington, is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 2. The Applicant shall provide and install curbs, gutters and sidewalks along the entire street frontage of James Street and Second Avenue as it fronts the subject property. 3. All underground fuel tanks on the north side of the building shall be removed. Entered this 3rd day of June, 1988, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearing Examiner under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. { i JAMES M. DRISCOLL �. Hearing Examiner NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Written appeals alleging specific error of fact or other grounds for appeal may be filed with the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Hearing Examiner's final action. In this matter any appeal must be received by the Department prior to 5:30 p.m. on June 17, 1988. An 16� THIS PACKET SENT TO HEARING EXAMINER ON 5/12/88 EXHIBIT LIST CU-25-88 EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 2 - APPLICATION EXHIBIT 3 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT 4 - DECLARATIONS EXHIBIT 5 - SITE PLAN EXHIBIT 6 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS Attachment 5 A EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILE: CU-25-88 HEARING DATE: May 19, 1988 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Conditional use permit for for wholesale warehouse and temporary parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S., Edmonds., II. APPLICANT/OWNER: Applicant/Owner - H.A. Hopper 530 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit 2 IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Description of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The subject property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of James Street and 2nd Ave. W. The subject property contains approximately 16,800 square feet. There is an existing 7,000 square foot office/warehouse building on the property. The Applicant intends to lease the western half of the existing building for a wholesale warehouse business for selling marble and granite. In addition, the applicant intends to construct a temporary parking lot on the north side of the building, containing 13 parking spaces. Surrounding development.is multiple family residential to the south and commercial to the north, west and east. B. Official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W West - James Street 60' 60' South - 2nd Ave. S. 60' 60' C. Zoning Ordinance Staff Report CU-25-88 Page 2 The -subject property, as well as the surrounding. area, is zoned BC. As conditioned, the requested conditional use permit does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance or the BC zone. D. Comprehensive Plan The subject property and surrounding area is designated as a Commercial/Business. As conditioned, the proposed conditional use does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. E. Not Detrimental The proposed use should not be significantly detrimental to the public nor to nearby private property or improvements. F. Transferability The permit should not be transferable. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of CU-25-88, subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 2. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks shall be installed along the entire street frontages of James Street and 2nd Ave. S. EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS HEARING EXAMINER APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # DATE ��`3I]L�• FEE APO' S HEARING DATE a APPLICANT�{reTL_ ADDRESS 4530 CAS ST• STE 1660 CITY & ZIP glozo PHONE %7r -ObyS INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY O(JQeV OWNER — A,(Og6 — ADDRESS PHONE — LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ( 3 ( — S6C6,,QD At)'E SNZ(( t�p�05 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 5tM 'b To be completed by the Planning Division: Legal description checked and approved by: Use Zone Z G Date: CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE: - Sig ature of Applicant, Owner or Representative Release/Hold Harmless Agreement The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. JA _ Signature of Applicant, Owner or Representative _0 , The southerly 22 feet of Lot 20, together with Lots 21, 22, 23 and 24 of Gephart's First Addition to the City of Edmonds, as recorded on page 43, Volume 5 records of Snohomish County, State of Washington. EXHIBIT 4 � APPuCA-O.OJ fba607001 r &AA . Lim 1Q,-XV1 x�s7l Oy:rte6 A&A -6 OAJ /V"N-,6 gs7' T��A BEST 1 • C.o�r� 1Zcor1 At- v< t7 r-aL W NUc.ES� usE " C 1(0 • -SO.O (0 . G . 5. ZiDiUa-VS C, . D. G . ) 'PA�fLICi !-oT .(17.-5o.090 eD. c. C>. c. DAC9 6ROU 1P157- t E-F 14 7.- ey 1954-'55 = '5UtLpJA3b CorJ-,5TAJagD by IRV POPPM UE 1 VOttL. OK `AS U.E`airef" MA4f 7Co 6ekvw AtAY-u'QaL Le-A560 ADVI �Wtle5 OF VIO BbItAl Po- FoZ 14c5 lW41&mT 6 sm)o55 uxMi- NE ,tmUeo Td kWUx LAKr-- -CeRRAtE "�fte7lme ARo" 1970. 19lo -V . AL�6K Fu&4.6A & LzA�x� 13viLp, rv- rtwt sT u6z , Fbfz.?ast&. pv40L,, `7-4-'75 -lam Cvyosrruc7 ,:-2 tZ5 U'vo4e ArRAP5 J m-r z f5 LOLL " -Co 77 �a 'South, ujs?cZ. QLAf2 . P(J f3 . tO" U?J-ttL 71(77. TINo . C4,WD%TlOrIAt- 05E 19�9 � �f�rn2 G�s7�Grca•1 AtcQu1lt�S i3ulc.o�ly- 1983- M : > 14W cult, Diffccutxy Gam, buit,Di#-b, To P8VM-t Zo 8A+jK- - t 9 = PR�002;6t FORal -sue /3 y 14 - A• Ifte e. (,orb f c dY�or15.�lP To .Zaj late 1 006. oX?XIr , t 98� ?Scauhe PP,&LIh'lKb" A D 5 AA9?o SAL F�ye A 1 DP�t'�,4 c.�QF�lCE/itrAP,E� e&wllel . pars �1�U5 OM (gL)S-5T Fo1L il. Cv�1Dl z'�rnJ•�c. e ?evAtr �o 5�2UE aVYZ NODS DM*)& 7!4ir- lQf&( EFAJIAJ& POeldP- T74a PRoSPEet-ra. 7eNtwT www k4eceiva,-s-CORZ, Aim SmP AARato Ao v 6ou 17E To Gtt &zz--s4� :. CUx,�iM1 2S tOtr o A46 !A) It& J3U31E55 of -', M&a4- .. 4K3CWc"rA1. To -1710 M4W 0% of 'pTo24G8 1 ZA 6--e3 WtWW M,- LIAUTEV FAf32fGAV4O (ND e4A& , OWMZI c.i) 1r ?i,� . 7,'4l ,5 P 5 A Pa&-5s,50 un�t3n. 16 - So. 010. S. i A5 A P&Mi 174P 15P�WAy !lam • •y CD�J Di7i�.1.4L U�� l� �J11�7 ALsol GVj j p (3a A.-i &jiira ogee Atv or YA5; eXt572A f BV il,D/0 . A-M,4�558V c�N1e� 1 to rio . o t o. • z Acs A rre--V P/alVSE - 7AS CiTr coop PZIplaer5 6FF 57ET=7 PA4Ka-�r tN 716 �OU4tA)JA.)G A(vLozlrjzs = t�s M)E -SPAcf,- Pee 400 q6 •36co 9' . 40a c 5.7 5 cz 15wes WA-96r I. one SPAa Peat. c &" 0 3j5oo' : /DAD = 3.6 oft.. -5PAZOS Nwe7.37t4rk*,p A&OU F-, uN a flojAq fjY 1990, ale ww LD LI K& Za mini u. Z?46 PARK/%,� xeTa/ Lit?: UWeQt 714r-, Z&.AS 6F TAt, 7L-Wi POAW P,4k1CtcA- rACl Ll 7765 f>10d 1l1 S 1Dx15 Df 7'/ aWE - 7rS fa y 7t A P 5 OM IW1 l 4, l9n5 uAv8yz. A60-CA 17�rn # A -Po - 40 •.W . f:::UU2 . Gall1>00 lAt, USE 1P-4"ve'57, C ^Y7'1.t/tlZ--'V ... . CO-AJCLU5/DAJ 5 F-A5w C p&r3 IN6 m S72 --alme- t�5r� 07c F,fZ,e7GA-7 ��2�t3E� 00AT eO,-Jt;P,tJC?'toA) -�2.OA466 MC/Gl Tla5 - � A e&,rJt i7iarJ,4L ZPik6 pEX-411T F6e 7A�5 5/ 7& ,5 Lam' Mi6eP AWE G )vU O 7 ,qc'%D COW 71'k 11aP MAF rA415 5/7E ,¢5 A GtJNdzE �9 �5�6E rt c, i, ry�,- Pu6LIG spry, 778- e3Z? �vur�rvs u/� y8aao AACV9 cr °PI" 1 J�Lo c 610* � 8x1'Y4>b cTp�6o a Ns. ttze:r✓ - � ilC'TI ',,Ls�Aut boy �t L V D /a3"-11ua Sdtsm GSiW , EXHIBIT. 5 PLOT PLAN otleNCR eftALSjWR41Yfrg:r o a to 4e os Lpr�.�p1.1: � ISI 50tcrJD AUE. �fi1 I L244L P6,4RAMMt 11W 'AM%V Y 21,cP Wt Zq t lb4emot " I.M We 21,217Fi ewhVeTb 19M Awnw i% I I" dN ef OW&VI M MeoRM or ynta WtN►N . 8G -jbMPGFd=>( Fye" �T OFFIGL : 6 0 ealS W/CEFY:rts + 4yAces TQOk 19 st�uas F1At0 %Jrcwirf MAP: j eXJSTtK)(k LTfla OwfQ ootF_ CompLey_ JAuC% S•T. �DMONoSt(l�A• r',e�3 Mkrr.bw i AO. Y.O. %,b4 234 EDAWY05 NA 4- EXHIBIT 6.. M ___.._ _. .. - ._ .... .__ _ _. ✓ '� VNZK owe Syrlp- U�..�i ^Y • WwT6� OrA' cv-4 5OUTH ELEVA-•roN 'b" 1,0" 4 o o —oE E 3 r E1W5T et-EVATtor► 'e- - l'O" 1 CaNd. OL4-. ! u3mv smt.16 okm axw vbcitl$ 1 CiA. We-sT ELP-VATroN 'e - r'o• El El El 0 NOr-TH F-.A--VATroN lb- ° VC11. ELEVATION STUoy fbr- Em%ING Off1GE/WAKf-1-loUsti GoµREX - sec v aao J"gas ST. , aDmoN05, WA . K4:2.1 MA:Ty--4 -0 k A95o. PO-W VM awowS WA. 4.lz•b3 M. APPLIC RN ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING A Xzo /��a a"°• ij ` ��' RETURNED FIRE PUBLIC WORKS -P- PARKS & REC RETURNED RETURNED RETURNED FILE# ! - 9' FROM: cL ;-7 INPUT: COMMENTS: �o wT �� c.� n t,�-ss ��►J'i � p�,r� �tts- P�.�-a'x1 n L-oT iA5Tw-4J-- Tn 966066-15 2M Dermot) 5q',f6r-I 4 JVUITA.vs 10eW CA� du-r rot- 4, .91 r;&W.Ac K Owner p Property Address 1,31 —20j Ave. Doa Date of Hearing Return By APPLICATION SITE PLAN FOR SHORT SUBDIVISION (8 112" x 11) FEE SITE PLAN (11" x 17" (4)) APO LIST �- LEGALS(Existing & Proposed) TITLE REPORT ENV. ASSESSMENT (if applicable) VICINITY MAP PROOF OF 3 YEAR OCCUPANCY (ADU) ELEVATIONS (if applicable) DECLARATIONS (Variance & C.U.P.) PETITION (Ofc. St. Map) ENV. CHECKLIST (if applicable) Comments: _ RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & REC APPEAL ## APPEALED BY: - ...- -.. HEARING DATE: STAFF HEARING HEARING EXAMINER CITY COUNCIL APPEAL UPHELD DENIED RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA POST & MAIL Date MAILED FINDINGS OF FACT_.___ Attachment 6 ROUTED TO: ..._ APPLI. LION ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST~ • ENGINEERING A RETURNED FILE## � — FROM: :7 ✓) . r) INPUT: FIRE RETURNED PUBLIC WORKS 9 RETURNED PARKS & REC �J�C��rj�ttQ�VED COMMENTS: N MAR ` 4 199, RECEIVED PO r FEB 1994 ��r,�allo� Ede o r Owner o Property Address Ave, Doa Date of Hearing Return By APPLICATION SITE PLAN FOR SHORT SUBDIVISION (8 1/2" x 11) FEE —� SITE PLAN (11" x 17" (4)) APO LIST LEGALS(Existing & Proposed) TITLE REPORT ENV. ASSESSMENT (if applicable) VICINITY MAP PROOF OF 3 YEAR OCCUPANCY (ADU) ELEVATIONS (if applicable) DECLARATIONS (Variance & C.U.P.) PETITION (Ofc. St. Map) �c ENV. CHECKLIST (if applicable) Comments: �r�r�r�r�r�c�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�c�c�r��r�r�r�c�r�rr�ryr�nr�r�c�r�r�r�c�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r,r�r�r�c�c�rsc�c�c�c�r��c�r�r�r�c�r�c�c�r�r�r�r�r�c�r�c�r�c�r�r�r�c�r�c�c�c�r�c�r RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS PARKS. & REC POST & MAIL Date �ryr,k�r��r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�c�r�c�c�r�r�r�rxc�r�r�r�r�r�c�r�r�r�r�c�r,uyr�cyrx�r�rx�c�r�rx�r�r�c�c*�r�c�c�r�r�r�c�c�r�r�c�r�r�r�r�r�c�c�r�r�r�r��c�c�c�c�c�c�rc�r APPEAL ## APPEALED BY: HEARING DATE: STAFF HEARING HEARING EXAMINER CITY COUNCIL APPEAL UPHELD DENIED RECEIVED'FINDINGS OF FACT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAILED FINDINGS OF FACT Attachment 7 APPLIL ION ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING COMMENTS: RETURNED FILE##— 9!�� FROM: INPUT: FIRE RETURNED PUBLIC WORKS �j RETURNED PARKS & REC RETURNED RaW 4� R 0 Z 1994 P PAR S E p , Owner p, d. A -.Property Address 13 AV e , _ Doa Date of Hearing Return By APPLICATION SITE PLAN FOR SHORT SUBDIVISION (8 1/2" x 11) FEE SITE PLAN (11" x 17" (4)) _ APO LIST —� LEGALS(Existing & Proposed) TITLE REPORT ENV. ASSESSMENT (if applicable) VICINITY MAP PROOF OF 3 YEAR OCCUPANCY (ADU) ELEVATIONS (if applicable) DECLARATIONS (Variance & C.U.P.) PETITION (Ofc. St. Map) _ ENV. CHECKLIST (if applicable) Comments: �r,ryryr,�nraryr�r�r�r�nr�r�r�r�r�r�ryryryryrir�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�c�r�rr�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r,k,ir�r�c�r�ryr�r,ryryr*,r�r�r�r�r�r�rx,r�r�r�r�r�r�c�r�r�c�r�r�r,�c�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT POST & MAIL Date ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & REC APPEAL ## APPEALED BY: HEARING DATE: STAFF HEARING HEARING EXAMINER CITY COUNCIL APPEAL UPHELD DENIED RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MATI Fn FTmnTNl;C nP FArT Attachment 8 ROUTED TO: COMMENTS: --i 10,0 APPLIL. AON.ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST ENGINEERING FIRE RECEIVED MAR - 7 1994 g 9 RETURNED ^ RETURNED .;�2- 494 RETURNED RETURNED FILE#— 9[ f FROM: INPUT: RECEIVED MAR 1 1994 r�•f �,,,s s icte � z l lG '12�vf cstiv� "� PUBLIC WORKS DEPT Owner o Property Address Doa �' Date of Hearing Return By PUBLIC KS PARKS REC n J i� N, APPLICATION SITE PLAN FOR SHORT SUBDIVISION (8 112" x 11) FEE SITE PLAN (11" x 17" (4)) _ APO LIST LEGALS(Existing & Proposed) TITLE REPORT ENV. ASSESSMENT (if applicable) VICINITY MAP PROOF OF 3 YEAR OCCUPANCY (ADU)- ELEVATIONS (if applicable) DECLARATIONS (Variance & C.U.P.) PETITION (Ofc. St. Map) �c ENV. CHECKLIST (if applicable) Comments: RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT POST & MAIL Date ROUTED TO: ENGINEERING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & REC APPEAL ## APPEALED BY: - HEARING DATE: STAFF HEARING HEARING EXAMINER CITY COUNCIL , APPEAL UPHELD DENIED RECEIVED FINDINGS OF FACT MATT M FTNOTN(,S OF FACT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Attachment 9 j8 90 C. 4 .{ +fir ,.. , �fi..�,'.,':, s. : . +n-�S,k`•R,:"f �+ µ t ,.F - 1 q.. ...f-., - - .. _ f f City of Edmonf -s- RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: / - Z7 5 Issue Date: - Ar A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 131 SEcotan Aof- 5DLtTw 9 B. Type of Work (be specific): pA21G 1 ta& I _,wr PA U 1 �_Y� 1 Contractor: 2, G ASPAA u-, PA91 #36 Mailing Address: 7.2Z28 - 95r,% Q,)+r W. State License #: UBA. �S P P 7 I O LR D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Contact: -tom O I E 8 RU E6 6 Phone: -7 -7 !� - 125l Liability Insurance: _I Bond: $ 4. OOO .'o Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. W Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ ,City'Eroject' ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family '4` Other � r INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR-,,, ' F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ❑ Yes ®NoJ -'G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge$ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ' ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSL/ANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771:'0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site all times f9J inspection purposes. Signature: Date: ( Ontracto Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK cnn rTmv i TSE ONLY APPROVED BY: - -- --- - TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER _,:!52 —DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: COMMENTS: . DATE: RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSITft DISRUPTION FEE/FUND Ill: RESTORATION FEE: PERMIT FEE. RECEIPT FEE:.7-1..�itZq . ISSUED BY:�� NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div.•1994 7'• .1 Au -WY 1q, Wltaa. hTnr 'GYP 6 2'G MAX.'SLqv CP 49" %R-O 4 wht-w•uuki ... I---- I I I I \� C%, Z 1 % 1_4 1 5 6 I T._L_8 1 9 8,*Aaoyca 6y = 6S 1 FI�xPc S� - � 3 •• .. *01. WJpC�pv� ZuD AV15 UE -soUTR a xvsrlN4 'ZD' *PM IN (A SPd.ce,-'5 * t - 9 81, - 19, .65 # 0 • t k l.� �59 18' '. I V 3 0 131 . ZRP ' .-s . eDAwMe, MEMORANDUM June 14, 1996 TO: Mayor Barb Fahey FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering CoordinatorL/`C�T3V SUBJECT: Parking lot situation at 131 2nd Ave. S. I received a memo today informing me of a meeting on June 24, regarding the parking at the subject address. The property owner received a Conditional Use Permit in 1987 that was temporary in nature. The permit expired in 1989. A zoning enforcement file was started on this property in 1993. On July 27, 1994, the landowner, his representative, and Engineering and Planning staff met with Mr. Hopper and his representative. We came to an agreement that the parking lot could be used until September 30, 1994, in its then present condition. Mr. Hopper was to provide the City with additional information by October 1, 1994. Mr. Hopper never returned the letter consenting to that agreement. . On February 7, 1995, as part of an Architectural Design Board submittal, plans were received from GeoDesigns for permanent parking lot improvements. A letter detailing revisions necessary to the plans was sent to GeoDimensions on February 15, 1996. On May 19, 1995, a copy of the February 7 plans was received by Engineering. The, plans, that had originally been stamped by a Professional Engineer had revisions marked up in green ink apparently to be reviewed. There was no indication that revisions had been made to the originals for necessary review. On June 1, 1996, 1 sent a letter to the engineer reminding him of the procedure for review and requesting that original . documents be resubmitted. On August 9, 1995, staff met with the applicant and his agent and asked for relief of code -required items that I could not allow. On August 16, 1995, the owner's agent requested the same relief of the City Engineer in writing. On September 15, 1995, Jim Walker approved the requested waiver subject to conditions. No further plans have been received for the Engineering Division to review. This situation very obviously frustrates me. Numerous members of the Planning Division staff and I have been dealing with this applicant and his agent on this matter for two years with no visible resolution. Mr. Hopper has had a temporary parking lot that does not meet City Code on a parcel of property for ten years. I would implore you that any decisions made as a result of the June 24 meeting be made with this history in mind. I would also request that you consider the time frame involved prior to granting any further extensions or waivers. Thank you. HOPPERMOC BUSIOS LICENSE API'LICATIO SIDE STAFF ACTION REVERSE APPL. NO.: CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH 'l EDMONDS, WASH. 98020 �nNE N FOR: TELEPHONE (206) 775-2525 0 LIC. LICENSERENEW YEAR ` LICENSE RENEWAL REVIEW BELOW INFORMATION, PRINT CHANGES AT RIGHT. —2 2. APPLICANT NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO. DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS 3. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME NATURE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS PHONE WASH. STATE TAX NR. EMPLOYEES I ORGAN. OCCUPANCY J TYPE ORGANIZATION IF BUSINESS IS: TYPE CAPACITY C 0 C - CORPORATION HOTEL/MOTEL L NR OF ROOMS/UNITS APT. BLDG. A NR OR APTS D L - LTD. PART , OFFICE BLDG. 0 NR OF OFFICES E P - PARTNERSHIP RESTAURANT R NR OF SEATS g S -SOLE OWNER HOSP./NURS. HOME H NR OF BEDS SCHOOL S NR OF STUDENTS ' 4. BUSINESS ADDRESSES BUSINESS ADDRESS LICENSE MAILING ADDRESS 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION NAME AREA TELEPHONE (2) J LICENSE NUMBER I ACTION ( LA - NEW BUS Jll LB RENEWACHANGE I I I LC - CHANGE LD •DELETE ICLASSI YEAR f LIC EFFEC DAIE I RFASG. LIC. NO.I SVS NO. I DATE PAID n PRINT 'X' '`� IN SPEC. BG} PENALTY PAID FOR ISSUE Of CORRECTED LICENSE WITH 'LC' ACTION. i LICENSE APPLICATION AND CHANGES PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY /2. APPLICANT F ST NAME, FIRST INITIAL Y 1 L DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH CITY STATE S a s HOME ADDRESS BLDG. NUMBER STREET APT. NO. 3 W 1 5 4 th t•- W6,attle FATE #M17 USI ESS3. /BUSINESS ID}(ENTIFICATIQN/[ BlsN%d�� yEl.F1L "/CA �� / %a% etw��% NATURE OF BUSINESS (DRUG STORE, CPA, ETC) BUSINESS PHONE I I JIm y 775 4 j WASH. STATE TAX NR. ANTICIPATED TYPE. OF OCCUPANCY (REGISTRATION) NR. EMPLOYEES ORGAN. TYPE CAPACITY N n S E— ENTER APPLICABLE TYPES AND CAPACITY T T ' 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (IN EVENT OF FIRE, BURGLARY. ETC.) LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL AREA CODE TELEPHONE (1) C n 0 6 - 7 (2) LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL AREA CODE TELEPHONE OFFICIAL USE ONLY 5S OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.F.I.R. CODE BLDG. PERMIT OCCUP. C.U. PERMIT LAND USE ZONING U.F.I.R. I PRIM. UNITS BUS. CODE COND. USE PERLAND USE L� MIT ■ CITY CLERK'S CACANT'SSIGNATURE RE❑ APPROVFD ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE E �OPM Cr.1 nn •� ;r-rr.r^r.� r^'r..r_tr BLDG. PERMIT CCUP. GRP. I lr ZONING B : S' SS LICENSE APPLICAT OK146 6EREVERSE STAFF ACTION APPL. NO.: CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WASH. 9802 APPLICATION FOR: TELEPH,O,N 06) 775-2525,; ! ;' LC LICENSE FILE ( - BUS ❑ RENEW YEAR FFI IAL SE INSTRUCTIONS 1. PRINT APPLICABLE LICENSE CLASS, FEE AND PENALTY PAID IN ANNUAL FEE BOX AT RIGHT. PENALTY DUE ON RENEWALS RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK AFTER FEBRUARY 15. 2. NEW BUSINESS: COMPLETE,ALL LICENSE APPLICATION BOXES. LIC. RENEWAL: REVIEW LICENSE INFORMATION BELOW. PRINT CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS AT RIGHT. 3. SIGN AND RETURN APPLICATION WITH FEE (AND PENALTY). 4.' LICENSE WILL BE MAILED TO YOU UNLESS YOU ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR FOR APPLICATION REVIEW. C- LICENSE RENEWAL REVIEW.BELOW INFORMATION, PRINT CHANGES AT RIGHT. 3. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION ANNUAL FEES' TYPE BUS. CLASS FEE PENALTY HOME A $10.00 $ 5.00 SMALL B 15.00 7.50 'GENERAL . C 50.00 25.00 BUSINESS NAME HAQrl ONI.ST!7',1NI NATURE OF- BUSINESS BUSINESS PHONE CON TI'Af T:-Ih (;L_iJr <A1. 77`5-914'3' WASH. STATE TAX NR. EMPLOYEES ORGAN, JOCCUPANCY 600-064-4.95 25 1 C TYPE ORGANIZATION IF BUSINESS IS- HOTEL/MOTEL TYPE L CAPACITY NR OF ROOMS/UNITS C 0 • CORPORATION L D - LTD. PART APT. BLDG. A NR.OR APTS E P-PARTNERSHIP OFFICE BLDG. O NR OF OFFICES g S -SOLE OWNER RESTAURANT R NR OF SEATS HOSP./NURS. HOME H NR OF BEDS SCHOOL S NR OF STUDENTS '4. BUSINESS ADDRESSES BUSINESS LIC 131 2"ID AV .S FDM(1"J�lS 1h'^, 0Q07r, 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION NAME AREA TELEPHONE (1) BF_ARO n _206 297-71P`') (2) _ OFFICIAL,USE ONLY U.F.I.R. CODE BLDG. PERMIT - OCCUPI C..U. PERMIT LAND USE ZONING 1.1 CITY CLERK'S SIGNATURE [- APPROVED � DISAPPROVED DATE FOPM rr, 'OVER 10 EMPLOYEES, OR EMPL WORK OVER 120 MAN -MONTHS PER YEAR. CLASS FEE PAID PENALTY PAID LICENSE NUMBER ACTION LA NEW El O T 3 L B{ LC CHANG ll LD - DELEII CLASS YEAR LIC. EFFEC. DATE REASG. LIC. NO c- -2, big (DPI I I I I_ RECEIPT N0. I DATE PAID 1 PRINT 'X' (J 7 9 D '7 15- IN SPEC. 13; FEE PAID PENALTY PAID FOR ISSUE C0RRECTi LICENSE WI LC' ACTION. LICENSE APPLICATION AND CHANGES PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY /2. APPLICANT LAST NAME• FIRST INITIAL SOCIAL SECURITYUMBER I I I I I I I I I i DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH W E 0. 1 DAY I YEAR CITY IT I I I I I I I HOME ADDRESS I I I I I I I I I I BLDG. NUMBER �Ej APT. NO a CITY STAT ZIP CODE h C 11 g 34 3. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME (FULL) NATURE OF BUSINESS (DRUG STORE. CPA, ETC) BUSINESSII PHONE WASH. STATE TAX NR. I ANTICIPATED TYPE OF OCCUPANCY (REGISTRATION) NR. EMPLOYEES ORGAN. TYPE CAPACIT`' 4 ENTER IAPPILIICABLE TYPES AND CAPACITY 4. BUSINESS ADDRESS BLDG. NUMBER STREET APT. NO. LICENSE MAILING ADDRESS BLDG NUMBER STREET APT. NO. CITY 11.1 11 1.1 STATE ZIP CODE 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (IN EVENT OF FIRE. BURGLARY, ETC.) LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL AREA CODE TELEPHONE LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL AREA CODE (2) .TELEPHONE �. 5S OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.F.I.R. I PRIM. UNITS BUS. BLDG. PERMIT OCCUP. GRP. CODE Jam' jyj CONDI, USE PERMIT LAND USE ZONING L _LIJ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE BUS. TITLE DATE 1TY Op BUSIAS LICENSE APPLICATION CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH ;!_ r EDMONDS, WASH. 98020 TELEPHONE (206) 775-2525 ` n' . I- INSTRUCTIONS 1. PRINT APPLICABLE LICENSE CLASS, FEE AND PENALTY PAID IN ANNUAL FEE BOX AT RIGHT. PENALTY DUE ON RENEWALS RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK AFTER FEBRUARY 15. 2. NEW BUSINESS: COMPLETE ALL LICENSE APPLICATION BOXES. LIC. RENEWAL: REVIEW LICENSE INFORMATION BELOW. PRINT CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS AT RIGHT, 3. SIGN AND RETURN APPLICATION WITH FEE (AND PENALTY). 4. LICENSE WILL BE MAILED TO YOU UNLESS YOU ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR FOR APPLICATION REVIEW. LICENSE RENEWAL REVIEW BELOW INFORMATION, PRINT CHANGES AT RIGHT 2. APPLICANT NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO. DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS ANNUAL FEES TYPE BUS. CLASS FEE PENALTY HOME A $10.00 $ 5.00 SMALL B 15.00 7.50 *GENERAL C 50.00 25.00 3. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME NATURE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS PHONE WASH. STATE TAX NR. EMPLOYEES I ORGAN. OCCUPANCY 'OVER IO.EMPLOYEES, OR EMPL WORK OVER 120 MAN -MONTHS PER YEAR. CLASS I FEE PAID PENALTY PAID TYPE ORGANIZATION IF BUSINESS IS: TYPE CAPACITY C 0 C • CORPORATION HOTEL/ MOTEL L NR OF ROOMS/UNITS APT. BLDG. A NR OR APTS D L - LTD. PART OFFICE BLDG. 0 NR OF OFFICES E P • PARTNERSHIP RESTAURANT R NR OF SEATS S S - SCI[E OWNER HOSP✓NURS. HOME H NR OF BEDS SCHOOL S NR OF STUDENTS ' 4. BUSINESS ADDRESSES BUSINESS ADDRESS LICENSE MAILING ADDRESS 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION t. NAME AREA TELEPHONE (1) (2) U.F.I.R. CODE CITY BLDG, PERMIT OCCUP. C.U. PERMIT LAND USE ZONING �- o,33ov STAFF ACTION E APPL. NO.; DATE: APPLICATION FOR: NEW LIC. LICENSE BUS. � RENEW YEAR I ' OFFICIAL [n� LICENSE NUMBERLANEW BUS. -LBRENEWAL do ILkLCCHANGE LD -DELETE 41 1 1 L CLASS YEAR / LIC. IEFFEC/. DATE REASG. LIC. N0. SPF�46 PT N0. DATE PAID %(1)< </7 PAID PENALTY PAID PRINT 'X' IN SPEC. BOX FOR ISSUE OF CORRECTED LICENSE WITH 'LC' ACTION. LICENSE APPLICATION AND CHANGES � PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY / Z. APPLICAN I ILAST NAM,Gf! E, FIRST INITIAL vl�—I g'p1 41 I I I I I I I DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH M0. DAY YEAR CITY STATE _Lj I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HOME ADDRESS BLDG NUMBER STREE R \� /- APT. N0. I I I I I I�i��Sp �X•1 iYJi 7i i . i I i i1 CITY All UI / IAIN IL Iil I,_� I I I I 3. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME(FULL) � '�I/fI�181�11C1 TvI�INI�%I+V Ulel%I� NATURE OF BUSINESS (DRUG STORE, CPA, ETC) WASH. STATE TAX NR. ANTICIPATED f (REGISTRATION) NR. EMPLOYEES l n o � I? E-- ENTER APPLICABLE TYPES AND CAPACITY STATE I ZIP CODEMJ BUSINESS PHONE �19151 s' TYPE OF OCCUPANCY ORGAN. TYPE CAPACITY C T T 4. BUSINESS ADDR BLDG. PR STREET A,h U - L AILING ADDRESS BLDG. NUMBER STREET APT. N0. STATE ZIP CODE 10lA 1, bl a; 5. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (IN EVENT OF FIRE, BURGLARY, ETC.) LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL ,. AREA CODE TELEPHONE LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL AREA CODE TELEPHONE (2) 5S OFFICIAL USE ONLY CODE PRIM. II UNITS II BUS. COND. USE PERMIT LAND USE BLDG. PERMIT OCCUP. GRP,, ZONING � G CLERK'S SIGNATURE ` [:] APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED DATE dPP ICANT'S 51Cy�ATURE J- `.BUS. TITLE 7Es DATE i . CITY OF 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 7 iy DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS irch 16, 1981 YYYMMM %rcJ� 1HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Dear Resident: On February 17, 1981, the. Edmond, City Council passed Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction and repair of deteriorated sidewalks. A public hearing will. be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center on April 21, 1981 at 7:30 P.M. You are invited to attend this hearing or discussing construction of 'new sii ewalk c>abutting your property. The installation of-new'sii1ewalks, at the expense of the abutting property owner, is provided by City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and Revised C0(10 of. Washington, Chapter 35.68. The area needing sidewalks hJI:; }>;r.n marked adjoining your property. Construction of th0r;e i.dewalks must be completed on or before September 1, 1'M]— In the event improvements are not completed within the zahov(-., 3pecificrl time, the City will perform and com)�lr1.c t:he improvements at.the expense of the abutting pr.Operty owner. This action is in response to many citizen requests and increased pedestrian traffic in �;)>eci.fied areas. S i.ncerc,ly, FRf.D I'. HER?131 RG Director of Public Works' ,i We7, the undersigne4wo hereby petition the City Almonds, to remove the RE,:,. ,:VLD 2 hour parking limitations on James Street, between 2nd Avenue South and 3rd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington. FEB 7 1980 executive Offices �� Name Address ��Rtp Fife Employed By C � FEB RECEIVED FEB 81980 el 2 i Ok. Of Public Works __ �. - -------------- We, the undersigned&o hereby petition the City of *onds, to remove the 2 hour parking limitations on James Street, between 2nd Avenue South and 3rd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington. Name Address Phone Emplo 'w� `��. ri "•..-,,:... ,err+ �p r r� CITY OF EDMONDS r8e, Permit No.COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT � Issue Date /,z- / <FcP RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Co B. • Contractor: Same _ Nre5 156 AV NE Name Mailing Address Bellevue., WA 9Rn(l7 City State Zip Mailing Address City State Zip 447-0700 State License Number Telephone Number • Address or Vicinity of Construction:' s.N• lbl L AV 5 t , Type of Work to be Done. Install, a new ctas service /2q Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily IR Utility Pavement Cut: ❑ Y ❑ N APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debitxor,credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Public Works: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. •'All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; no exceptions. I understand the above and that this per ' must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times.' 0 Signature:&" Date: 12 / 19 / 8 8 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must Be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -DIG Prior To Beginning Work ISSUED BY: ''/ ® 1 • V /. Time Authorized: Void after C) days: Special Conditions: Amendments: PERMIT FEE: •!�3 Security Deposit: Receipt No.:_ Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: X NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Dllg. l Iv. July 1701 FIELD INSPECTION. NO S (Fun 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 n h\ h V N N ga Ift Co A J 3J,�e 8 m 9�2y/0S \ro'' A T •+ .e%.O s� (L '$, ry Nby 9�'s,O1+•F � •� @. 81PF/P ,,, M 3S �f° Q', Q' � A s'cb r try//t � �• ° r Q• 'y> F e' 0.`[ Y \ �' ` •� NN �a, '? 3 v � �• \P � d a° � Z`sr �' �6C s 'ry a 229 �y>e 3s P,y `> (�� p1� M1 YV Q J.2/ •I'�CCP� p>A 33S oo /P • n0 \p r 2/y. \ ry J`f dp- \� .t ♦ fi•Jv i� V �O •h Jy.�P )'. nl 4�/ c'J• l/ \b s' 'u v: �. ? S 'gJ h � •,� y y �Nl Fd '�' / 27;� e3.a T�� 4Ni 3•i 3q Ry :ti /9?oy �� \� /%8S 99s d 4'�� 'i` r, �k �'�♦tfc o� 60 -ly o 33j� PE � 66 .T 1a rrr' ♦ h 1 .T. " � �W ry1'� \lam p0 • \" V Q, `:. i*(1 )q q \ J m �98� \ 9�F y�1\AV p /r♦+�` ,•j [ M Q0 N a f�•#6.� .\• AV a- ! i• `A r �hwN abvr_o a� ♦` 'y 6J. S • i°` 19 Ili 1/ •� er in2WaN �d A l• T 10 !f G I U u f 11• 141 Q _ 309 923 S J 3 y o, Jita.1'i 112'N � d0 b 9—I N 1�p N S�8"92iJ f- 1972 1 /98T �.s' ye112N303 h4 00i > 11� i 9 `�/e1n7N 1976 r DAYTON gT 1979 U W u-3 tf01 ,�� 1 N �N� q 2 STYV k P L 2/ N CP CGOI 6 l R 4N s'atW IP 81'N U L 5 � L 4- s1W IP I:M1 NfCPk-2"3CR. T!! �' GZ loao5 a-a10� sa 3 F tl Iw N /9b0 ; ; 1J-2/B7 � J-als� 3 1e 3 4 t 2 A p �r ;t I I1 p o a Jug Jcar .31. o u a O W U 04 O w CITY OF EDMONDS : ' COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. • Owner: Na��, 50-L. ST Mailing Addr ssLi LN6 (� R � 0 20 City State �� Zip B. • Permit No. 'Vo^_300 Issue Date 2 2 Mailing Address City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number �J • Address or Vicinity of Construction: y 2 A vt,,_� 131 Z40 45-S Type of Work to be Done: Gb-PJ C�� (=LS L2t 1-- L > l r l A 1D E3 - 40-88 A-,Jp G L3 Zh �5 °y Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility Pavement Cut: ❑ Y %-N /� %�PRii�rrMf/R/CP AWD SRO ASTED cy-22—ff APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND -MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Public Works: 771-3202 • Work is to .be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; no exceptions. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. G l> 7i Signature: Date: Owner "ntFaete+- This Permit Must Be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -DIG Prior To Beginning Work ISSUED BY: 7 Time Authorized: Void after 30 days. Special Conditions: 11411 107G � 1 ofo 6Fro =r Ur*1M l AJ _ CAI G Amendments: PERMIT FEE: ___ :30. ra v Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund 111 Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: X NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. July 1985 City of Edmonds _" Traffic Impact Analysis .Worksheet tic. 1 s Name of Proposed Project: ACEEA Rbyy," r_ay\ bD L�`i - rdis WC Owner/Applicant Njgh bcWJ`es Ghr>'s�ir>Q Name &3 S lie. , !b� Street/Mailing Address Ed amdS GJ}9'UZI' City State / Zip Telephone: U �7 Applicant Contact Person: Name Street/Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone: Traffic En ' eer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Ngthe Contact Name Telephone: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS E-mail: Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated 1 and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) 11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections PROJECT DESCRIPTION /��,p n f ��1 D� a. Location - Street address: �/ (�_�� ' J " A U1. � (Attach a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: c. Specify proposed type and size of development: dA L Zoo ff.(# of residential units and/or square footage of building) Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 1 of 5 A d. Date construction will begin and be completed: e. Define proposed access locations: f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident historyz (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): ' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic. within*the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated'ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: ' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. ❑ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based.on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance_ 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. ITE Land Use Category . Per Unit Fee Rate New Use $ a O Prior Use $ 0-7 Units in square feet, Fee # of dwelling, of , etc. X New Use Fee: $ - Prior Use Fee: $ _ $ ' ❑ NEW DEVELOPMENT ITE Land Use Category New Use I 1 $ ❑ OTHER Units in Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, of , etc. X INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ City of Edmonds, TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 1 $ Division Approval Date Fee No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 CA FILE NO. C-q — OD I: 0itical Areas Checklistb ---------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography./hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: (31 ZN n A Ve. ►ays�E ,u,-R} 2. Property Tax Account Number: q54 8.00t • 023.0002Z454 8. 00(-O ZO • 00 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 1 041+0 4. Is this site currently developed? _y yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? -Mc st 4-0 n+C"i r cL SM ,11 n t Q bu;l,4► r, �. �Y Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: /VO ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: AJO ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? Site is in the floodway 6�O floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? /u D Flows are seasonal? IVO (What time of year? ), 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs _ : mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: �1 D •L°41�aild'..pregC 'p%li tV "'s ^� l'.`Wl);: :, `i.,`,•> Yam' �;`.�$v. < Y•'n,;;:: n :'. ]V /'.I'Are'as;fttz?e`E r`"' .-��.:•;.C1r 1w p+,j (} ,u�..r: � `}i.... .•v... ..'i:: �: '. .:•. c .. ... *' Y LiGGa M''� F•' �` �.\ {'':� •s Y: ...:'� •. •. :. ,..t .pj �••;. � .4' � gi.��7icafe9 C #�ca o ate .. b '>, � �' ::z.:.� � • i, r > ,�,. • : S•ixe:��thitt�d'esJgnated'earth �uBsidence �ai�dsi<sc1� �azat¢�are��`> '. �. • �: ., ,:� . .': s:k �, �• , ��tc>desi`oo��teet.�i�r;i��:i��n.�?icontiieaf'a�p��/��eiisci`�{�''�.`�`i j� '°µ •:J C1= }. -�� x. w. .. a ..n nn...o .... .... . avw .,....rwI,..... v. i .. F, r!.��Q�� y.Y•� .� '�_ ar` .'':�:<. >i:: ,•: L:.v .�::. 1bTZ`ER�V[ii�A"F��iPi�; .,�':..�>;,�.:��:��?. •..: :�� :,�.;;: <., :<;:y, :�. K'.j��'r;!l T.�,.;.gy::::'Y-0`�.•ii ne'�! .>. S l •�'' •1 rii': f".V+•7.iti':^J,�T?�.h/�`.rt. T'.'•:'t+t I,�,,•ti "•�w`fj.: v •r �•: 4s y;k a ,� �5 ytti lr y `ReV1eVYedby� 3. t y < ♦. rr ��Y-l. y Al „Y y^^ r i 2. �'+ i? ,.�aniirj� yq.Y• Q ^" :: +; `� K' `.;";;:::. Mti fi < 11_ a. ,� ° e <;r, < •-,�. K TY e .... .. .... ... .. .. .. .. ... .:f. "raS"+'•Tt::x.. .. ••:y:' �..... • a .tsi .vs.x.....w;.✓.. f .� ... .' a.. •�c..'� . �:. �Y�yyd:��."' ss .4 ^0 .ChUK My I01OM • y of ED,y City of Edmonds CJ Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 Critical Areas File #: WK - ov - 16D Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45,00, Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: Q 0-0 City Receipt No: I (o ( � 7 Date Mailed to Applicant: CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to. his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: �o h Name se w U-Nu o A S� . Street Address &Lctt- Q. \A N '� ko \ City State Zip Date Applicant Representative: Name Street Address u -- w c� 1 b l City State Zip ZDto �oLLA -3Zo Telephone Signature 9 ► too Date d:roceptloNjana/CACLHandout.doc Revised 41IO/2= I lnC . Is')') • CityOf Edmonds. PERMIT NO: 9582 SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT EXPIRES Address of Construction: Property Tax Account Parcel No Attach copies of all access and utility easement Owner and/or Contractor: and Approved by Contractor License #: G'OEI * 6 q i D4 Building Permit #: • ❑ Single Family ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) commercial (No. of Units ) ❑ Public Invasion into City *Right -of Way: Pfes ❑ No *RW Construction Permit. Cross other **Private Property: ❑ Yes XNo **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. zhv/o Date By signing for this -permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled Side Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. 9 CALL DIAL-A-DIG(1-80041i 5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION 2 2 FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extension% 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REOUEST.S.�,: City Permit Surcharge Fee $5.00 Total Fees Paid $ ��✓. NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY,FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED. Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: Initial: As -built to Street File: ❑ t� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE tz- White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bl dg;forms;sspermitj lg4/00 r 0 PLANNING DATA Multi -tenant Building Business License Information BUILDING NAME: F�y1 0ndS 6Ce-rorqD ILE #: 2a40 102 SITE ADDRESS: 2—kiA Ave- S ZONING: '5c. BUSINESS NAME: t L. faro &#-p SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconformin Land Use Determination Is s ed PUP File:PARKING: Use: GC n0 on- i-k_ca'Im;o.s Required: '2-14 X 1 (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ , /C� sus BUSINESS NAME: A4 tow rv-/ h SUITE NO. toe, USE(S) PROPOSED: ,l ALLOWED?: Yes Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/M CUP File: — PARKING: Use: � u - - an • i"k ter. No. Spaces Required: I p X -74 28" )or area, # employees, etc.) = 9,3 BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: _ Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = _ PARKING: Total Required: _ Actual Provided: OTHER: •� ►� b l 1cJ Plan Review By: cAfilcs\pcm ROPLANDAC_BusLic.DOC 'S • . • PLANNING DATA New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects SITE ADDRESS:, Ve ZONING: USE(S) PROPOSED: Z 6VF- I ® 'O06 ALLOWED?: LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) CUP File: To Allow What Uses?: ADB FILE #: -%qr toIg PARKING: Use: I t9ff IAQ I 6W No. Spaces Required: 0 �� X 51,`'3V (floor area, # employees, etc.) Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: _-4- X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Total Required: Actual Provided: A-Q SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: Left Side:ZRight Side:. Reare Actual Setbacks: Front:�Left Side:Right Side: ar: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed:_ [ro + Actual Height: S fiy� Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:` Datum Point: ez&V "5�. Datum E e ation: Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR# c ! g Ctivl�s a LANDSCAPING: `y�t5 ✓ For— avwTh n �, Matches ADB approved: o Bid Provided? HQ . Bond Amount (100% bid): z CRITICAL AREAS #:_ 149 %V 16 a z SEPA DETERMINATION: I'ID H lJ- C SHORELINE REQUIRED?: p m Continued ... l : \I i brary\^P IandatNewComm.doc DATE: PLAN CHK#: �OJ t - 6 NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: fb PROJECT DESCRIPTION: L-) / IIt-4-'l ADB FILE #: I?ZO r to y OR D TE7.4DN IVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: t+ AP" SUBDIVISION: y w LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? OTHER: Plan Review By: 6- 1Afibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc i 4 • • .(PC.18911 CITY OF E D M O N D S GARY HAAKENSON 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Hugh Ferguson 601 Union St., Suite 4512 Seattle, WA 98101 September 11, 2000 RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2w PKJB ARCHITECTURAL GROUP Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist: CA-00-149 & CA-00-150 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The `DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO RETAIN A COPY OF THIS CRITICAL AREAS "DETERMINATION" FOR YOUR RECORDS. Please examine this Determination for additional requirements. You may need to submit additional information such as an Environmental Checklist or Critical Areas Study. The Determination for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination, not a project -specific determination. . YOU MUST SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APLICATIONS OR YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Thank you, Planning Secretary c: PKJB Architectural Group Kathi Williams, Project Architect *Architectural Design Board D: mydocuments/spel lman/CACLletter.doc L:temp/jana/CACLletter.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 Critical Areas File #: C t1 " 00 -14 9 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: 14 City Receipt No: I tp) Date Mailed to Applicant: CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled. out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete. the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information .(e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: VAW� oV\ Name sQ o 1 Ulm o A Street Address ko City State Zip : (1 16 le�00 -0 Date Applicant Representative: F7KsI5 pti lr� -mac-Cu�.o►L c,�u11 Name (an�a2-r S-r. 5t,�� oVa- T Street Address _,eo--W� w ?�" City State Zip Telephone Signature 9 ) oo Date d:reception/lana/CACLHandout.doc Revised 4/10/2000 1WENO. • OD — I�•I ► Aft'ical Areas Checklist -------------------------------------------- Site Information (soil s/topo graphylhydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 131 2*' G L Ve—r.IL1,E 2. Property Tax Account Number: '�S�k 8.00�l • 023 oCX72 �45� 8.001.0 20 bC�nS 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): I O`i•O 4. Is this site currently developed? )c yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? cb Describe the general site topography. Check all.that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). .Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): Site contains areas of year-round standing water: NO ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Ai ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? S. Site is in the floodway kJd floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? P D Flows are seasonal? /V O (What time of year? ) 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow : shrubs _ :mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) � 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: J�jD taffFlSe 01 1 .. 44 is Zocied �..:.x . ... 9CMagpedsotltye%) Weil&pdit�vecito+pr:mapd�catS 1velanpreen.pn�stke - 4 . CiEcal AFas inventory or C giep�iricates;Ci#�ca urea on §rte?Q1, ti' ��:• Side �ytthttt_desIgnaied earth.: uBsidence Iat:tislide hazaid•':area?...' �i�;�. Otte:destgr�ato��o�r;ihe•En�ionrneufally Sensitise :leas �ap'�: �> . <:��..:�:.... °��. •: FTERi1?ItNXT-i(?N" ..` :�`r !7!,��. `t♦.♦ ,r?.. ♦e . ... Mrrr�r�+iri7' .��. •If."R� r _.L.^/ f w •• j s _ r. ^J':.: i`,.>. � f J —r•r�` f � 1f 1"ef 7—'Y a. Z r ..-, .... .... .... .. ...... :.� ..,. ..:<.... .,....... .=,.... ` .,. .:Dates <.:,M ^a-ehkdoq RW 1WO3197 rEoM°ti City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 Critical Areas File #: LA - 00 - /S-D Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45,00, Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: y &0 City Receipt No: i (o ( 1 7 Date Mailed to Applicant: CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete. the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: �(' o v\ Name tool ULvu o ,A �� . S LA!b� 4612 Street Address ('ut-Q \..j R $ ko City State Zip 16 14010 Date Applicant Representative: PK-J-P Name Street Address City State Zip' 2D L logy 3Zl o Telephone Signature 9 i 100. Date d:receptloNlana/CACLHandout.doe Revised 4/1012000 1LE NO. C4 — OD '- �' r GOtical Areas Checklist -------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography./hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 131 ZNn AcVerau-E• 2. Property Tax Account Number: qS'-5•001•023•o ZILa54,15•001020 o0nr 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): I 040 4. Is this site currently developed? �_ yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? t� 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. iC Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: NO ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Aj0 ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway fib_ floodplain= of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? p D Flows are seasonal? AJO (What time of year? ), 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow. _ : shrubs _ : mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) �{ 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: �D , USC..O..S3w:-'io„ri,•�-:.�a . :-?,4... a .... "^�''-`.Y::•:i�•: ... •} .:, a! .al�.J,�.:l..x.:, r.F: ..:$ n >,...•.. w.4... . •�.":.s: �:.d>:lv�,'c.•$:: = eil --- - -"v iito'' i -. ' is".:., :at` '7v :.d; >.: K< > w I. -Y..: ,x:. - - . ::....... �tF..,.�..i ........, � .....P., ? ...� ?�. 1?r ° :?ns:tire• }. �i.... ..}:..� ? i <, .;:A� 'r < SR:� t+EIEIC ;�;• . : S�i�e,�ywthpt designated earth•s�Bs�iie•,tice•�a�fr8s1ic1� �tat�;ar�A?, °. �; � ,{�i,,< ,•, • ::,:: �-:.,�.. • �Stclest$gatectn(futzkironnneafayenstct�t t'as A+�x r: 1bT'I`ERikCIiVA` ..... F , „:: : z; s • >:: } - : , - :'L.• .... . is (y,•r F.: '. .';': < ,4! _ :, �.. .•. i •�.,.. �i:¢.ar•:• t •"-.-::�r"'�T^C'•rM.C::•R'N:::':.4n ti.'�(. ;>:'<_ ♦ O : "'. L.r 7_',: .CON A,�',}I`11� r+.rf>.: •• •':•'w.i i ate ...,. .. !�� ✓i' ii: ..7P.lann�r q6�•Q x,.,.. ,�,., �„� �• :, t....• k^,K. C ,p CV.��+�'�;•e.< < % \: .:}.. .7T •. :':.•. .Yi ::::•n`..anll ".r:::J.,.✓w• ,r^.A.�\.;� \ ..d, A tiV t. -u ehkdoe, Aw• IQW/97 CASE # ZE - 93-107 CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT BAR 9� 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 312.7116 Location of Violation (Address and/or description of location): North of 131 - 2nd Avenue S., lock 1, Lots 21. 22 and the south half lot 20. Gepharts First Addition to Edmonds_ Edmonds, WA 98020 Issued To: Harold A. and Carolee Hopper Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 530 Bell Street #1000,. Edmonds. WA 98020 Code Section Violated: Edmonds Community Development Code Section 17 50 010. 17.50,040, 17,50,050 17.50 080 and 17 50 090 Description of Violation: Use of an area as a parking lot for required parking without improving the area to City parking lot standards. Corrective Action Required: 1. Submit an acceptable lease agreement for the required parking and cease using the subject area as a parking lot as of the date the lease begins: OR 2. Submit a complete application for a building_ permit for a permanent parking lot and construct the parking lot as required. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00 p.m. (time) Apri126. 1996 (date) If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation will be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation will assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date.Posted: 'March 27. 1996 Date Mailed: March 27, 1996 Date Served Issuing Party M.E. Meg GruwelI Title Code Enforcement Officer Signature 8.9 0 - 1 9 �) CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works . Planning . Parks and Recreation - Engineering November 20, 1995 Ken Mattson PO Box 234 Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ken: t LAURA M. HALL MAYOR BUILDING NOV 2 1 1995 Thank you for coming into the office to speak with Jeannine and myself about some of your concerns. To clarify one thing mentioned in the letter you submitted, no 1 day extension was granted for your permit applications. The former Code Enforcement Officer just indicated the expiration date of the permit application as a working day, Nov. 20, where the Building Official's letter had indicated a Sunday, Nov. 19 expiration date. In response to your letter submitted to Jeannine Graf November 20, the Planning Division gives the following reply: First, the Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Parking Lot and for Outdoor Storage issued . October 10, 1994, expired on October 10, 1995 since no extension was requested prior to that time. ,Since building permit applications have been submitted for a fence and a parking lot under the terms of the Conditional Use Permit prior to its expiration, those building permits are vested with those conditions. If the Building Permit applications expire, no new permit application could be submitted under the terms of an expired Conditional Use Permit. Also, no extension may be granted to a Conditional Use permit that has already expired. Second, the fence permit application will expire at 5:00 PM today, Nov. 20, 1995, if you do not want to go through another Conditional Use Permit process for outdoor storage, you need to pick up the fence permit today. Finally, if you intend to abandon plans to build a parking lot on your site by letting the building permit application expire, and propose to accommodate the required parking through a lease agreement, that is acceptable. But once the building permit application expires the City will commence enforce m ent,proced u res by initiating the Civil Penalties process. The first step will be the City issuing an Order to Correct. We will grant you 30 days to resolve the violation. If no action is taken, the City will issue a Notice of Civil Violation. At this point, fines will begin to accrue at $100/day until the violation is corrected. No means for appeal of the City's determination or fines may be made until the Notice of Civil Violation is posted. If the violation is corrected, i.e. through a lease agreement, prior to imposition of any fines the Civil Penalties process will be ended. Please call, 771-0220, if you have any further questions. 4inely, EN F. OCK cc File Nos. ZE-93-107, CU-94-30, and ADB-95-20 Jeannine Graf, Building Official Jeff'Wilson, Planning Supervisor Mr. Hopper, Property Owner • Incorporated August':] 1, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan TELEPHONE/COUNTER CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: ft 45- TIME: FILE: L I Ili 4-p de II v (-4- i4cn /a 144 is, 'le lif 14-cet- ve--te d -tz&.ces-k-� 4 60 clqx 4n CV1111-6 IVY/ /21 ke t",9 bZ4- I%e 114--e- & 12-flqel /(' ff-04�,' WAS LJ 0"t"Ll w gf aW2 Ilk ,dAlkw2 la JfAt� .mod/V jAi d Za /� /- Aee df mot -�� 'dL,U +0 4,,f We fe.S.a w4-f- 01 j`kt L),/t- lei 011 ( /ffd-e A 9-'WA4Z"11 3V ee91le't"I%IC�111 f-2v//Le w114 I'vo "i /vo (/Vic� 60.-v Of V11l'-7 -'L /7,v /vii Hti o,,, f bz oc, -/ c/oar -4e Wlblwcl v A `[c-oo A c' �� L d« t I� I t ct, moo.w1� T i y i LeSd c� L1p J4 c—sD f 11191 cT-q_ 1. i ram._._. 6zST Tz- -) c - _ _ P�-fzAA k ... —ra J;3T J).- A L T �-C4 -CaoEca- AIAT-c .......... 890 199 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering November 1, 1995 ' Mr. Ken Matson P.O. Box 234 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Parking lease for 131 2nd Avenue South Code Enforcement File #ZE-93-107 Dear Mr. Matson: V-, igWW,, - 171C LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The matter of the parking lease has been forwarded to me in the absence of John Bissell, Associate Planner. As John previously informed you by telephone, the City Attorney has reviewed the lease and found that it does meet the requirements of Section 17.50.040B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The code states that if the off-street parking is not on the same lot as the use for which it is required, the owner of lessor shall provide to the City for recording with the County Auditor an agreement specifying: l . The location, by legal description or survey, of the off-street parking and the use for which it is required, and 2. A restriction on the property designated for off-street parking that it may not be used for any other purpose unless the parking is no longer required for the use specified in #1 above. The City Attorney also said that in addition, it is clear that the intent of the City Council could not have included short-term lease agreements for this type of parking, since such lease agreements would be impractical to monitor. l have enclosed a copy of ECDC 17.50.040 for your reference. As you were previously notified by the Building Official, the permit application on file is due to expire November 20, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. Also, the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage has expired, therefore, removal of the storage items must also be completed by November 20, 1995 at 5:06 p.m. Your only avenues to resolve these violations are to obtain an approved building permit and complete the parking lot, or submit a valid parking lease agreement approved by the Planning Division. Failure to comply by the aforementioned date, shall initiate the Civil Penalties process, pursuant to ECDC Chapter 20.110. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. SinW'4cerely, AW& Ann Bullis Code Enforcement Officer cc: Mr. Harold Hopper, 530 Bell Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 Building Official City Engineer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 19C� CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering October 19, 1995 Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Non -Conforming Parking Lot @ 131 2nd Avenue South Dear Mr. Hopper: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the status of the permit application on file with the Building Division for a parking lot. Since this is a violation case the permit application is valid for six months and is due to expire on November 19, 1995 (date of permit submittal 5/19/95). The significance of this expiration date is that the violation must be completely resolved or fines shall be imposed as required by the Civil Penalties Ordinance. Since your request for appeal to an Engineering Division interpretation has been denied, and it appears no other appeal process is available to you, the approved parking lot must be completed (via the issuance of the permit) and/or a valid parking lease agreement approved (in order to resolve the violation) by November 19, 1995. Also, the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage has expired (October, 10, 1995) so removal of the storage items must also be completed by aforementioned deadline. If you have any questions please feel free to contact the applicable division. We understand that you have a future development proposal, however, the current violation must be resolved by November 19, 1995. Thank ou, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official cc: Ken Matson City Engineer Code Enforcement Officer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan MEMORANDUM October 6, 1994 TO: Planning Division FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S. (CU-94-30) for Hopper The conditions of the attached letter have not been met as of this date. Because the conditions have not been met, the Engineering Division recommends that enforcement action be reinitiated on the subject property. Please keep the Engineering Division apprised of the progress on this action. HOPPERMOC Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Your parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S. (CU-94-30) Dear Mr. Hopper: On July 27, 1994 a meeting was held with Bob Alberts and Gordy Hyde of the City Engineering Division, Steve Bullock of the City Planning Division, Ken Mattson, and yourself. Based upon that meeting, you agreed that, if the decision between yourself and the Planning Division is that the parking lot is temporary, then Engineering will agree to the following: • The parking lot can be used as is until September 30, 1994. • Contingent upon short-term development options occurring, you would submit the following information to the City by October 1, 1994: a) Drainage calculations for the parking lot, based upon a 25 year storm with release calculated for a 10 year event. b) Paving plan for paving the driving aisles including the entry. c) Landscape design. d) Schedule for construction of the above items. If the decision between yourself and the Planning Division is that the parking lot is permanent at this time then the Engineering Division needs to review a development plan with storm drainage calculations, grading and paving plan, and a landscape plan as soon as possible. . " Your signature below confirms your agreement with.the above timetable. Thank you for your cooperation and concern in this matter. Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator cc: Planning Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner H4RoLD A. HoPPFR &AssoagTFS October 5, 1994 City of Edmonds Stephen Bullock, Assistant planner Subject: Parking lot at 131 2nd Ave. S Dear Mr. Bullock: This writing is to update you on the status of the above parking lot. prCTIVEM OCT 61994 ENGINEERING We have not yet received the hearing examiners response to our agreement pending his approval. I'm sure he is overloaded - no problem. We agreed an alternative_ to developing the parking lot was the construction of an entirely new facility with parking provided in the building. Financing for the new facility has been applied for and approval should be forthcoming in the next two or three weeks. Today approval appears likely. We will keep you informed. Sincerely, ; arold A. Hopper cc: Robert J. Alberts, City Engineer Ken Mattson MANAGEMENT CONSIT iANrs 530 Bell Street, Suite 1000 Edmonds, Washington 98020 • 206/775-0655 89p_19o�_ CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering September 1.5, 1995 Ken Matson P.O. Box 234 Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Staff Decision on ADB 95-20 Dear Mr. Matson: i.. LAURA M. HALL MAYOR SEP 2 8 1995 'SEW COUNTER The Engineering Division is unwilling to grant the waiver requested for the driveway access unless certain conditions are met. We will allow placement of the driveway curb cut north of your property only if you can obtain an access easement froth the property owner to the north and you realign your access road to the parking area to center on the driveway curb cut. The adjoining property owner should be informed how this could impact future development of his property. Contact should be made with the Planning Division to determine what impact the easement could have on future development of the property to the north. Repainting or restriping on -street parking is obviously dependent on what is currently there and how your curb cut is modified. If the curb cut is modified, you will be required to paint the curb within five feet of the access yellow to designate no parking. If you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer c: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator HOPPER-DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan �1Ty VVY (.vim Pbkl) t � 6lJNIns Iks MALL /.c _dam � � �� — ,:e• = i �. � / G 1 ter' '/ �' ri i L►� 1 , Two , W- WIA", MXI-.. WL i► i[�L 1 _' '► ' OJe .�MaeN� ,,, .�MaeN� ,,, ��1 �/l.b-if��J �7 � • D 32 R 890-19.4 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering LAURA M. HALL MAYOR August 5, 1994 AUG 5 1994 Mr. Hopper ENGINE.EIjING 520 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 re: A Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Parking Lot Dear Mr. Hopper: Ultimately, all parties involved, including the City, would like to see the subject property developed to its fullest potential. We understand that you are actively pursuing opportunities which will allow you to proceed with a development like this. If redevelopment of the entire site will occur in the near future, the city is not adverse to supporting a temporary parking lot. But, our concern is the same as it always has been, and that is that if these opportunities do not materialize, the temporary lot must be improved to standards for a permanent lot. With this understanding, the City will support a Conditional Use Permit for a temporary parking lot at 130 2nd Avenue South for the period of one year as allowed by code. The City will also support a one year extension of that Conditional Use Permit if the applicant can show that it is needed to complete a funding package to redevelop the entire site. In any case, at the end of two years, if the, site has not been redeveloped, the parking lot must be developed to City standards for permanent parking lots. This arrangement includes all the conditions agreed to at the meeting held July 27, 1994 with Robert Alberts, Gordy Hyde, Ken Mattson, and yourself. You will also be responsible for complying with the requirements of the original ADB approval for landscaping. Please note, assuming that the Hearing Examiner approves the requested permit, any extension of a Conditional Use Permit must be requested before the permit expires.. A Conditional Use Permit is valid for one year from the date the Hearing Examiners decision is issued. Also, if the Hearing Examiner approves the Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage and you act on that approval, the Design Board will need to review that proposal for the design of the fence and any proposed screening. Should the Hearing Examiner approve the Conditional Use Permit, a condition requiring your signature on the line below would confirm your agreement with the • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International— Hekinan, Japan terms discussed above. Thank you for your cooperation in working_with the City in correcting the situation on your property. Sin rely, ST PHEN LLOCK Assistent Planner 02.4ngineering Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner Attachments Engineering Division letter dated July 29,1994 0 Approved: H. A. Hopper Date 890-199_ July 29, 1994 CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250 - STH AVE. N. • EOMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 •FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and'Recreation + Engineering Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Hopper, Based on our July 27, 1994 meeting with Gordy Hyde, Steve Bullock, Ken Mattson, and you, it was agreed that if the decision between you and Planning is for a temporary parking lot, then Engineering will agree to the following: • The parking lot can be used as is until September 30, 199..4 • . Contingent upon short-term development options occurring, you would submit the following information to the City by October 1, 1994: a) Drainage calculations for the parking lot based upon a 25-year storm with release calculated for a 10-year event b) Paving plan for paving the driving aisles, including the entry c) ' Landscape design d). Schedule for construction of the above items If the decision between you and Planning is for a permanent parking lot at this time, then the Engineering Division needs to review a development plan with storm drainage calculations, grading and paving plan, and a landscape plan as soon as possible. HOPPER.DOC • Incorporated August I1, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 11, Ir Mr. Harold Hopper July 29, 1994 Page 2 Your signature below confirms your agreement with the above timetable. Thank you for your cooperation and concern in this matter. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer GCH/RJA/sf c: Planning Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner APPROVED: H. A. Hopper Date HOPPER.DOC � � e MEMO TO: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Building Official C DATE: August 4, 1995� RE: Hopper Parking Lot Ken Mattson has requested a meeting on Wednesday August 9th at 11:OOa.m. If you cannot attend please call him to reschedule. Planning has approved the permit and I am only waiting for a handicap space detail but apparently he has many questions for you. 890 194 - July 29, 1994 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - STH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering Mr. Harold Hopper 530 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Hopper, r LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Based on our July 27, 1994 meeting with Gordy Hyde, Steve Bullock, Ken Mattson, and you, it was agreed that if the decision between you and Planning is for a temporary parking lot, then Engineering will agree to the following: •, The parking lot can be used as is until September 30, 1994 • Contingent upon short-term development options occurring, you would submit the following information to the City by October 1, 1994: a) Drainage calculations for the parking lot based upon a 25-year storm with release calculated for a 10-year event b) Paving plan for paving the driving aisles, including the entry c)' Landscape design d) Schedule. for construction of the above items If the decision between you and Planning is for a permanent parking lot at this time, then the Engineering Division needs to review a development plan with storm drainage calculations, grading and paving plan, and a landscape plan as soon as possible. HOPPER.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Harold Hopper July 29, 1994 Page 2 Your signature below confirms your agreement with the above timetable. Thank you for your cooperation and concern in this matter. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer GCH/RJA/sf c: Planning Division Ken Mattson Jim Driscoll, Hearing Examiner APPROVED: H. A. Hopper Date HOPPERMOC 890-199 July 26, 1995 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. } EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works . Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering Harold Hopper 530 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Required Corrections for Parking Lot Permit Application #95-77 131 2nd Avenue South Code Enforcement Case #ZE93107 Dear Mr. Hopper: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The Planning, Engineering, and Building Departments have reviewed your parking lot application and have notified Ken Matson and GeoDimensions of the required plan corrections. For your reference, enclosed you will find copies of correspondence stating the necessary corrections. It has been nearly 6 weeks since corrections were mailed, and to date the City has not received revised plans reflecting the corrections. As you are aware, this matter is currently under enforcement action, therefore, it is important that action be taken to correct the violation in a timely manner. Please submit revised plans to the Permit Coordinator by 5:00 p.m. August 10, 1995. Your cooperation in resolving this matter is appreciated. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, "'xL1 Ann Bullis Code Enforcement Officer cc: Ken Matson, P.O.Box 234, Edmonds WA 98020 Ray Miller, GeoDimensions, 1601 114th Ave SE, Alderwood Bldg #110, Bellevue, WA 98004 Building Department • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan City of Edmonds Plan Review Corrections Project Name t�°/L Cy1/�j �% Plan Check # -/S 7 6©�r61"64 -)'0 '- (AAdV u (41A_ s5-20- 310-7) Reviewer Department %C�9 Datedl,"ths- 890-19")- CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - STH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 . FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering June 1, 1995 GeoDimensioris 1601 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Ray Miller LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Subject: Proposed parking lot improvement at 131 2nd Ave S. (ADB-95-20) Dear Ray: On February 15, 1995, the attached letter was sent to you regarding revisions necessary for further review of the subject site plan. On May 19, 1995, the attached plans were submitted for,review. The plans cannot be reviewed as submitted. The staff has a long-standing review procedure for proposals such as . this and those procedures must be followed to allow for timely permit processing and adherence to appropriate construction standards. This project is in enforcement review at the present time and to minimize potential penalty, staff recommends that policy is adhered to and that revisions. are made as quickly as possible. As indicated in the February 15 letter, when the revisions are completed, please resubmit four (4) sets of plans with the earlier enclosed red -lines so that the Engineering Division can complete its review.. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. rely, ordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator GCH/sf Attachments cc: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator HOPPER2.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - STH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 8�_ Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering 90 19 February 16, 1995 Ray Miller GeoDimensions 1601 - 114th Avenue SE Alderwood Building, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 LAURA M. HALL/ MAYOR Subject: - Proposed parking lot improvement at 131 - 2nd Ave. S. (ADB-95-20) Dear Ray: . The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject site plans. The following comments/corrections apply. • Show proposed contours. • Provide parking dimensions • Show how retention pond area will be permanently fixed for storm water storage. • Provide a safe conveyance overflow to CB #2. • Provide details of erosion control measures and show where they will be located. • Provide minimum of 1.0' of freeboard. • Provide specifications on seeding mixture and planting instructions for grass -lined Swale. • Construct a speed bump or asphalt berm to direct flow from Swale to pond. • Realign driveway to match entrance to parking lot. This will require relocation of power .pole. • Reconfigure parking stalls accessing off alley to be perpendicular to alley. • Show how on -street parking will be reconfigured and repainted. Because. I expect to be out of the office from February 21 through February 24, 1995, please direct questions, especially drainage questions, to Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans, together with the enclosed red -lines, so that the Engineering Division can complete its review. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, Gordon C. Hyde Engineering Coordinator Enclosures cc: Sharon Nolan HOPPER.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Japan .n.Y .y AaJD '�IIJI� �fCll(�i "P*�9(CAPPeP AJ414136' . Sc mi e 3 -h' AJOGJE, PAavu. 5 -L r CF r/7 I PAS �l� AcC� -rb va Aoe S . ciiY Fit 96-77 S �� h • t� ( -775.05 7 �NZlL4N� t30" W&A / wAw (Off (CE�) ' r MCICASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. No 12018 TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT NO. KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-9800 EVERETT R--�(425DAT CERT. NO. 9-0817 —\L,�T 6402. 2z� FIELD REPORT v�- �2 PROJ, ECT� a-Vef L j0 LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER 2ao— c3e 2S' //�� WEATHER TEMP. AT AM �/Ilq%�A D �. ��n/Ya<-7-7 AT PM ENGINEER C.4024 I ATTN: ARCHITECT CONTR C OR 3 INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEEUCONCRETE — RE�STEELONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS 4 LOCATION CONCRETE/MASONRY SUPPLIER SLUMP,(INCHES) _ AIR CONTENT r\pe� skr, MIX NO. re DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c)_ TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SPECIMENS CAST SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO 0 _tfYES —NO —ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS 2C o�nn-Q 4 REMARKS: D V-*,- �v)-o .33 C-N- A "r-(-)y PA I TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED 1 BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE i f TESTING LABORATORY, INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 8/00 SIGNED BY n a 01-25-2002 `11:12AM' FROM -Auburn Mechanical W91N Pump t5 vJ&K 30 -50 YEIIS W030-50 ARE RUGGED 3-5 RORSSPO{t ER 50- M RSISI,>i CENT$ GAG GRINDER PUMPS DESIGNED FOR RESMEN ul" LIGET COM'MENCIAL, UWUSPRIAL 02 MUNICLPAL APPLICATIONS. They are especially designed for grinder pump. requiring higher flows at low to moderate heads. The WG30-50 feature a heavy- duty cutter mechanism and recessed impeller design to etudenny grind typical sewage solids into a fine slurry.. WG30-50 grinder pumps are available in standard and U.L. Listed explosion-proot (WGX30-50) construction for use in Class 1, Group D hazardous locations. Woo WG30-50 ceder pumps can be instated in a variety of packaged systems. Facto {tssembled simplax or duplex packag gut a raU systems are aval . Individuarlv0-compone s az'a available svr uWalla- don in on -site concrete systems. F.E. Myers; otters a complete line of submersible sump, sewage, effluent, grinder, non - clog wastewater pumps. controls. bmir>rs and accessories. For additional lnformatton. please contact your local Myers representative or the Myers Ashland, Ohio sales office at 419/289-1144. )&DVAX E$ 7AY DIRSIGN IDEAL FOR USE IN LIFT STATIONS. e Recessed lmpeller provides non -overloading high flow operating -curve. j7 4-),$ LSO Wal Certifted'� .BAN 2 �- 20 ENGINEERING DIVISION +253-833-1384 T-528 P-005/050 F-430 cELd WG300m50. Stdmdcxrd (WG30-50) and. losipn-prod (WGX3D-50) 3-5 HP S nn*r. ble Grinder Pumps DUjiMX MOTOR WILL. DELIVER UWF TE. RS OF ]REI,TAIII•L: Sp.RVI ■ 031-filled motor or maximum heat dissipation and constant g lubrication. ■ Recessed impe or reduces radial bearing loads: increases bearing life. r High -torque for dwipingle phme or three phase motprs for assured. starting under heavy load. ■ Seal leak proq and on-wipding heat sensors warn cf seal condition; and stop motor if motor over h Helps prevent costly motor dcunge. THE W63t1w50 IS DISIGM MR ZAW MAIN4R ANCIL e Shredding ring and grinder impeller are replaceable without dismantlMg pump or motor. PRODUCT CAPAAn-MS CopaclVes To 185 GPAQ 693 LPM Heads To 92 It. 291 m HCtridlin dvt»311C raw sows 0 intermittent L.la+ud Tem Up to 140-F u to 60•C Wording Insulation Temp- class a 26WF 130'C el a migw prolewn aopaeRat Molar Elsc�cn aon ttyyppe.. onmr nsuos tar prapor opex Im a .) 3450 REM. 60 H2 3-6 XF. 230V, 1 Ph 3-6 HP. 2 3 ,230AWV. Ph Sid Third Party Approvals OptlonW Approvals CSA UL Class I. Group D (vr6%3p_W QW) MIR Fee I10 Acceptable PH Range 6-9 aPwAttc GravitY .9.1.1 V3sc05ity 28-M SSU Discharge (Plunge Dun. 2-1 2 M 63.5 min Min. Sump pia. Sunplea) �Duplex) 36 in. 48 m. 91A cm 121.9 cm N=: C.ornWl to,docr roc appbcubom ovisldv of tram reco=ewattons coasbu tson Hates Motor Housing, Sect Housing Curd CaP and Vo to Case cost iron, Cl= 30 AMU AU-76 tier recessed bronze Power cord 25 fl. SOW SOW A Control Cord 25 ft. SOW SOWA Mechcuacol Seals Stanaarci OPUMCd double tandem. carbon and ceramic lower tun ten carbide NM. Motor Shaft 416 SST Fasteners 300 Series SST I Shredding Rmg d -Gander Impeller 440 SST. 58-60 Rockwell We: W7UE1NN0VAn0NItetXM n2 ADn7G1V 11,11 M.SQ9 Pamir PWP crate 01-25-2002 11:12AM ' FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-838-1384 T-528 P.006/050 F-430 WWW Q30m50 and WGX30=5a Standard (WG30-50) aid. � 1rplas=o ,piOol (WGX3450) . 3-5 HP 54Tneisible Grinder Pumps . $imp 3450 Rm i and 3 pham- press ht tot per w align- ment Wd beat heat lrmistsr- Oil-rilled motor conducts heat and lubricates bearings. CA= rAM stsM Prcvidw double seal protection. Cable locket sealed by compreoaon grommet. Jndividual winos *baled by epoW Pott�Q, sm Protects motor tram bu=ut due to excessive heat Irom any overtoaQtorimon- Automaacaliy resets when motor has cooled. RAi.1:1d81►1:IIft1S Uper and lower ball DapQrJnt3s support 6Acrit and rotor and ioke anal W 4 mdnat loads. K191V1T 416 ift SM" COrrosiOR mdstan1. Redacas.a tan Aatlactton due to grinding loads. $SAP? 5ZW Dabble Ia rJ= rnechQrJcW matt soots protea motor. oil -tilled Seal d=nber pro- v:14eB Carginuaw mbr"fim uxi as nom lArAW water in seed hq%xsin9. AI=lvates warning Aght la control panel (Test resistor on UL Listea models.) Vt0¢.Til'B CASE Carl iron: htormontai &clioroa- (Drilled tor. 21 Alps tictnge- ll \ D�LLSA , Bronze recessed mgwlier cau =Ass WU s>»BM NMM h=llas >ro=d auTry Wuh- Grinder impeller Takes radial okn clogging or binding. and shredding rung loan provide$ Provides unobstructed boW are Mlaoeable paints pall. (UL pomage. Reducer, radial wnhoat distnantimu listed puLnps load$- Pumpout vane* help pump. Constructed of 440 SST hardened only.) keep timh irom woL reduces pressure at seal to 56-60 Rockwell. *aces DIMENSIONS 100 90 so 70 2D ,0 0 »— 6 _n22 tMA. FLANGE LRti.610rm 2 V2 37D, PIK FLANGE CURVE tr um per Npwb 2s s 20 40 60 9p log Ila lag ,GO Igo Pttt1 0 = cnla�. Par IApwu APPROVED BY ENGINEERING R k�Da e* oz K3425 4M — - ® F. E. Myers, 1101 Myers Parttway, Ashie d, Ohio 448Q5-18OR Printed in U.S.A. 4t8l2B9•tt44, FAA]xC 419/289-6658, wwwfemyets com Myers (Car>eoa), 2W Tl RWm Odd. lGpt:hwer, Ontario 10G 4W8 ilk 5191748-5470. FAX 5191748-2553 01-25-2002 11:13AM FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-833-1384 T-528 P-007/050 F-430 2Sis 4 5- MIN. is 6 MAX. ti F i LEGS OPTIONAL APPROVED BY ENGINEERING zl I I ES - 22.5 11/2 [TA. F ANGE DRILLED F R 2 .9f2l' STD. P PE FLNGE 7 DIA. Myers Environmental Systems WG30, WG50, WGX30 a WGX50 GRINDER PUMPS SE 2- ES-223 tt'7 01 ,5, Date: 01-25-2002 � 11:13AV FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-833-1384 T-528 P.008/050 F-430 WGX30-60 EXPLOSION -PROOF GRINDER PUMP SPECIFICATIONS tJbX so -SD - Pump shall be of the ceritritugal type Myers model or grinder unit and submersible type motor. The grinder unit shall be capable of n domestic and commercial sewage including reasonable amounts of foreign objf plastic, thin rubber, sanitary napkins, disposable diapers and the like to a fine s the pump and 2' discharge PiP8- Discharge shall be standard 2A6 flange. Pur listed for Class 1, Group D explosion -proof service. o b L - Pump shall have a capacity of 10!2 GPM at shall use a 0 HP motor operating at 3450 RPM. ual with an integrally built in aerating all aterial in normal s such as I wood, sticks, ry that will ss freely through and motor sembly shall be UL total head of0_ feet and Mg-fOA - Pump motor shall be of the totally enclosed, submersible, squirrel cage induction type rated „ horsepower at 3450 RPM, s0 Hz. { or three phase 200 volts , 230 3 volts, et60 voles or Motor shot! be for single phase 230 volts_,.,_ 575 volts Single phase motors shall be of capacitor start, capacitor runEMA L type. Three phase, motors shall be NEMA B type. Stator winding shall be of the open type with Class F insulation good for 155°0 }311 OF) maximum operating temperature. Winding housing shall be filled with a clean high dielectric oil that bricates bearings and seals and transfers heat from windings and rotor to outer shell. Air -filled motors which co not have the superior heat dissipating capabilities of oil -filled motors shall not be considered equal. Motor shall have two heavy duty ball bearings to support pump shaft and take radial and thrust loads and a Sleeve guids bushing directly above the lower seal to take radial load and act eA flame path for seal chamber. Sall bearings shall be designed for 50,000 hours 5-10 life. Stator shall be heat shrunK into motor housing. A heat sensor thermostat shall be attached to top end of motor winding and shc, 11 be connected in series with the magnetic contactor coil in control box to stop motor it motor winding temperatui 0 reaches 221 °F. Thermostat to reset automatically when motor cools. Three heat sensors shall be used on 3 F hase motors. The common motor pump and grinder shaft shall be of #416 stainless steel thyded to take pump impeller and grinder impeller. SEALS - Motor shall be protected by two mechanical seals mounted in tandem with a seal chamber between the seals. Seal chamber shall be oil filled to lubricate seal face and to transmit heat from shaft to outer shell_ Seal face shaA be carbon and ceiamic and lapped to a flatness of one light bar>Id_ Lower seal feces shall be carbide (optional). A double electrode shall be mounted in the seal chamber to tom on at water�wng the t l box. This signal shall not stop er through the lower seal. Water in the chamber shall cause a red light motor but shall act as a warning only, indicating service is required. pQME 1MELjL0 - The pump impeller shall be of the recessed Myers type to provide an open unobstructed passage through the volute for the ground solids. Impeller shall be of 85-5-5-5 bronze and shall be threaded onto stainless steel shaft. Enclosed or semi -open pump impellers which might bec 'me obstructed during grinding or add excessive radial loads shall not be con equal. APPROVED BY ENGI�t�01 .CAI 2 2002 7 � Date: ENGINEERING DIVISION 01-25-2002 11:12AM FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-833-1384 T-526 P-004/050 F-430 ®1•Eo•2DOZ uR:5EPu!—F88Yt-�w h mil--, F - 59�83j- T ` -2a r uti Iv r-.v. �t 13tl4 � u �� _077Z 2. 41 Al 7v ... _� UIN Pt 44 T. as US rT Ear- - . ' R •y1 .� OW • I + -mil. ':.�,._ 2 . - s 'ENGINEERING !`1,ViSION SiSd Wmcz:ZT zow SZ 'wer SrLK 9179 GFV : 'ON 7IN❑Hd •ouI `dno.Ao yezeS : Woad ■wrr..��rrrr .�■! �i■i�lww �w�■■�� . �.!��lw��lwwr■■r� �aiwrrr��l��►!�s��►�wl��■■ �.�:�rr��•r��.�rr.��►�u r ��l�ri��ri�rr��w�w.rw,w■■sw , !■�t�rrr�'��rr��.r��l��1l��r ■ ■■■�r�urr�.!��rr,rrrr:�r��■i�t. ��rr�!■rw�r�r�r�►rr��lr;�► �wr�■w ■■■w■r�!la��. ■��rrrlr�rrrr!■ wwerr�rr��rlr�.~�.r�� !►��rrrlr r��■��s� ■■w�rr�*��nr��r�rr��lw ■war■■�!��■■rw�i��■��rl� WSW mmummulrlrmmumrrr 01-25-2002. 11:14AM FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-833-1384 T-528 P-011/050 F-430 T 25 "_. 2" 7� 5" F- L x3'"40 L SF.C'IYON AA itan"m 7z Fbakod� � !h MsbidNdpim 0-23a lad Sow* IAA` E--NGINEERfi4G DIVISION' A - DETAIL A TYPICAL RU'SBBR t,ASXET CONNl3MON APPROVED BY ENGINEERING tirade mU,mwwm tt HW avAable in2", VA" CiCmmutiG or auk cam or n" mp8 optioetal. Flat Top ouQtc with 25" to aae side oe m '� - a1ab. Rem�f minS is 0.12 W/laya F SECTION Socum amava0able = hagio Of 11tbrn W. All joint Lou des4pal foot we With Aubbca G,sslm, Steel ReWbrced Polypm"lW Seeps and APWA bAdms am OSHA approved and mulled as nqumcti 01TICI&Mtial WAU mb forcing is 0.12 W W RAW HAW Base Tmitn are av Uble is 2, 31, V and S hdgbss. Rainfm t-mg is "way tnitumuriq All units mm or mad AS?M C 78. 010P ASNSMATInUX Cored boles or blockow avail.aaa as requ4W MgXlrrmm hole size is 36". Minimum dism = bctwau bolas is 8", WEIGHTS W-M Oval � ;L 04 DIMENSIES lCum ML Bay t CD 21373 TATIIM GP!! t.IIH JiP. ,P,iM OI.T A a C � .� ► — Z r.-I �Q � VElIT >< i W IA a3 S ALTImmma �� SPECIFY INLETHUB(S) [ sa s. F ,\ • ,� ..a d. 14 .e air ea: r N NNRQi /� 1 T Q 4 � nt eeQ c Y � M F o 0 4 i1F ea, o. p 4ea�e 7R » 7e _ T _L � ra re+ I is 0 1 +� R hi11= n.mT Mf Oe �'� (1 ty �, Q 0 v sn _,� WST09ift CONTIAMMOPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION s MERCURY LEVEL SENSOR 4 ronr,. dm�utanots 'm x . _ n@Cl Pu I Mase�ser sum cum FrA)1514 Ft -OOP- ).Of -Er Hea+ VAM suam To l -3 `G +BEtQ�i rF MM ODE ��--�e p F� I fl -3 6'f rue�n ow TO /Jurr Tr »aH YA • .1 � �`a c mw - - ! - 5041 or su.kw t _ —� FLNU ELM o CWM roe T a ,• m p — taoas .ss-a� us .nt �e; �► ass ------- -- " 3 l7fK. gumn dYw uA� caw IIeu iNSTALLATtUN DRAWING 1°� skTAKE star i "� v� cam" �„� a.�,® o.,R DUPLEX UNIT u» cv md" sues to IM r49ML IrLm wITM rn� rum a P UMP@ a � e wt B C D 21373 R .� spas a m & .m t. to a=" ,"-M) 0MAND.CA.M.S,A. ea>NE HC �L, j N ' 01-25-2002 11:15AM FROM -Auburn Mechanical +253-833-1384 T-528 P.012/050 F-430 ut•za-xaaz o6:a�w r -�uawrn Munenica� +cao-oo�-��a. 1 Y*Y I .vivo.,. -.. nil mr ell, 0 4A to GV 0 ^ 1 A - -Iw ` ... ... , _� � — 'ram• \ l ��C P a - • : —'i o T9 spy APPROVED BY ENGINEERING � Date: 7 ti S/Pd : T T Z0@Z SE 'UpS ECK 9P9 SZV : 'ON 340Hd •ou I I dnO. !o uez eS : WDNd IV HAROLD A. HOPPER & ASSOCIATES 4REEFILE 530 BELL STREET SUITE #1000 EDMONDS, WA 98020 City of Edmonds Development Services 121 5' AVE North Edmonds, WA 98020 To Whom It May Concern: RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The Purpose of this letter is to advise you that an independent remedial action under Washington State Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) will begin soon at property at 2"d and James Street in Edmonds, Washington. In 1986, I purchased the property from what was then Old Stone Bank. In 19881 was advised of the presence of underground storage tanks on the property. Shortly thereafter I hired Lee Morse Contractors to remove the tanks. Last year I sold the property to Hugh S. Ferguson. In the process of planning for construction of an office building (with below ground parking) Ferguson hired Earth Consultants to explore the area in the vicinity of the underground storage tanks. According to a report prepared by Earth Consultants (copies of relevant pages attached), they identified diesel contaminated soil. I am notifying you of the status of the planned remedial activities in accordance with WAC 173-340-545, (Private rights of action). For the Department of Ecology this letter is also intended to constitute any appropriate notification required under Section 173-340-450 (site discovery and reporting) and Section 173-340-450 (releases from Underground Storage Tanks). In accordance with the MTCA, my intent is to conduct a remedial action that is "the substantial equivalent of a departr lent conducted or department supervised remedial action." At this point the only known contaminated media is soil. The remedial action will include the excavation of soil above the MTCA cleanup level for diesel contaminated soil and the transport of that soil to either a permitted landfill or burn unit or to some other approved disposal or treatment facility. Because the planned building involves underground parking, the soil removal will be accomplished in conjunction with the basement excavation. Soldier piles and shoring will be installed prior to excavation and removal of both the clean and the contaminated soil. Demolition of the existing building on the site is expected to begin next week. The installation of soldier piles and shoring will require approximately one additional week. As required by MTCA, the remedial action is planned to begin no sooner than 15 days after mailing this letter (unless a waiver of this requirement is obtained). Should you wish to comment on this proposed remedial action, please contact me at 425-775-0655. Sincerely, Harole A. Hopper 7. T ��1rt11 C�llsuIt�11-its Inc LI i 1 t ;�!1 f'• M I (wartI1nN ;II I:,Igiiwets, UN1klr(1�I5 I7IYIPN111Y'lll;d 4.'H'tttt�t5 E-9280-1 foarch 15, 2001 Ferguson Construction 1433 5`" Avenue South Seattle, Washington 9%S 10S ;��ttention: Reg Clc)k;^jdslcy Subject: Edrzlonds Office Building 2"d p venue South and James Street Edmonds, Washington Dear Reg: e of on March 8, 2001, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) excavatedtofng backfillmater al including d ttie old tank pit area. The west side of the t st side of the trench opened up rench consistedn area of gray soils. These gray pieces of asphalt. The ea nbow soils exhibited strong odors of hydrocarbons and showed mately nine d(9) feet ndeep and signature when placed in water. The trench was app ing width. One soil sample was fifteen (15) feet long with varyne soil collected round. O ls sample was collected from the soils at a depth of four feet below top of gwere Cray soils at the bottom of the excavation at a depth of nine feet. T oeseresu ts ples sate sent to an analytical laboratory for hydrocarbon identification. diesel hydrocarbons are present in the soils. The laboratory results and cleanup levels that Y follow. Analytical results are attached. CA anup Levels. for Sample a Depth Result Present MFor Cleanup New esel (effective August 2001) Levels For Diesel Z000 ppm ED-1 i 4 Feet •1G00 pprn Diesel 200 PPm ED-2 I 9 Feet I 72 pprn Diesel 200 pprn 2000 pin"► Recommendations It is recommended that the area in question be examined work, , ree eddast onpr port, and ior to site construction and as soon as possible to allow for the site "no further action" (NFA) status and the time for Ecology to presentation to Ecology fora review and approve tl-)e site for an NFA status. ) 6q3 378p FAX (a?;) 7a6-0860 Toll Free (888) 7319.6670 8005 Bellevue ( � t?6th F ice rngion 9d�� I, Ii.t.. SU i Ferguson Construction March 15, 2001 E-9280-1 Page 2 Remediation Proctrar�' ntl the extent and size of the contaminated area is occupied edn the sold tank hpit, �it e s Presently, information on the number and size of the tanks that flue 25 feet lone, by twenty assumed that an excavatian nine (9) fedeep r removal ofthecontaminated soils that are (25) feet wide would be necessary to startroximately 208 bank yards or 24Q truck above the cleanup levels. That would be app ite ion yards. Once tl-Ie coie of the soils have been removed further e excavation wallsorChas •rr:la;ed required to check if contamination haou dwadtepast t e deeper into the underl��ing soils or to g nd icensed The remediation contractor hired must have 40-h9ur training removedaanndbtralnsported tto' ;he contaminated soils. The contaminated soils will be appropriate facility handling hydrocarbon -contaminated soils. Once the final limits of the excavation have been reached, confirmation rsoil samples a pl s will ll� I collected to verify all the contam pod soils ethe NFA paperwork, present it to t will compile the site cleanup Department of Ecology, and request a NFA status for the site. At your request, ECI can provide a proposal and estimated costs for this remediatic project. feel free to call me at (425)-643-3780. If there are any questions, please Sincerely, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Robin Hamlet, RPG, CEI, CRS Manager of EnvironlTICntal Services RH!jma Attachments: Analytical Results Earth Consultants, Inc. ANALYTICAL -i LpBOItATortES, Inc. --- CE=RiirIC11-i c OF:,yf�ALYSIS��' DATE: 3/ 12/01 EARTH Coi,JSULTANTS, INC. CCIL 300 //: 1030,16 160S 136TH PLACE f lE, SUIT E: 201 COIL SAMPLE 1 BELLEVUE, VJA 98005 DATE RECEIVED: 3/3/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION n : C192 ? CONTACT: F,CBIt'J HAt IL r " PROJECT ID: E-9250-I .r SAMPLE ID*.L=i3 1 3jE3(U1 - - 1 DATA=nESFJLTr`` - r.• ARSON ANAlYS1S ANALYSIS M CT ItOU q(SULTS• L.EY EL" " UNITS"" DATE .MY •\iL 3/10/01 LA}-7 •.:�L;�TILE RANGE il:.rTt'1 {.r,;< No MG/KG 3/10/01 LAH EPA-8021 �)D(<o.4) MG/KG 3/10/01 LAH EPA-8021 ND(<0.4) MG/KG 3/10/01 LAH EPA-8021 ND(<0.4) MG/KG 3/10/01 LAH 50,11ZENE ErA•0021 i10(<1.2) MG/KG • `r.IC� 3/9/01 KAS 1 ';�;-1!V0LATILE gA,4tGE Nl TPH-D:{ 4600 r 1G KG i CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY DIESEL CHRO1•L%TCG2.4M I^JDIG�, e.S SAt'111LE • ;y0i�\Ttj A.�ALY'! A.y►L\':CD fGA 01rT NOT CRLCC10 Ar LML ABa�E Fcmll ING LIMIT, Ar7CATiNG IIMrr IS G. W PARC>m+[:ES 00. AS FOLLOWS: 011`i C;VC:Ar1LE iAh C•r) A`T'j(1T•NG UMrr IS 10 M(7 JKG � Ot�al PANGC 4tl'CAT:l'G LIMB 15 130 MG;KG _ IIPOE OIL I•'ANCr gpCA^,NG LIMIT IS I10 MWO .j.,;' : fCtl ALL NCN ^V:C SA,t�'.LS Ate, AiiCc I.V C'+ A C5� wliGM'r CAi:S .. .r. I1�'',C L•_\rt l5 n°C rz(T'�ICEO Uu�,l' wr!t't - 'ZAMCTCA CArA IS UStr) r0A A CENCAALLY C'R NPLI�,\r.^ V. N1 CN CIrC^�ICCv. '•liry ;:CulO et I1:C0 AS (,T1i'JELINES O NLr. APPROVED 6Y:_ Page 1 I jolly Drive 1:\ I'L tt, Wit 982U8 '�'S "iSli-2600 ti:AX 425 356-2626 - Seattle 206 292-9059 'ON Xla � S3I b01.VKGV1 100 Wd 60 N NOW 10-Z I -NNW CCI ANA1.1-1'IG'1L :_ LA➢0RA►0RIGs, INC. -- CCi2T•iT1C�'L�� Q!' J�i•JALY5IS . D/IlTE: 3/ 12/01 1 : EAR", H CONSULTAtifl-S, iNC. COIL JOB 4 : 1030•16 1605 135 T H PLACE- NE. SUI 1 E Ni CCIL SAMPLE /:: 2 BELLE`/UIE, 4"4`A 98005 DATE RECEIVED: 3/8/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION 4: C142 i CONTACT: ROU)I;1 HAMLET PROJECT 1D: E ?DSO-1 :T SAMPLE 1D: CD 3;N;01 -- DATA RESULTS` AC710N ANALYS13 ytALYSIS ME7NOU WCSU LT S- UNIT$•' LEVEL— DATC DY ••=ItTC 3/10/01_ LAM vCLATiLE RANGENvJTPIi -GX NO MG/KG "LAH EPA-8021 ND(<0.1) MG/KG .5MG/KG 40r-IG/KG 3110/01' 3/10/01' LAH ' ..'"'`r'E EPA-6021 ND(<o.i) MGlKG 20MG/KG 3/10101 LAH 1.uEt+E ND(<O.1) EPA-E1021 MG/KG iI+L6-NZENE MG/KG IYLSS 20MG/KG 31.10/O1 LAH EPA-8021 ND(<0.3) 3/9/0V KA:S i I•11-SE`IIVOLATILE R.A4GE NWTi'H-DX 72 MG/KG PRODUCT WHICH 15 LIKELY DIESEL INDiCATE5 SAMPLE CONTAINS -:;;TE. CHROMATOGRAM • ••,p- T tu)1' QCYLCT!O AT LVAI A00VE Zw00.^vG LIM(T. nFVOnTING IIMT'f CS CIVCN IN VAQ17Kn1tZbS OR .15 FOLLOWS' :.,uit'j,Tu nrN"L nnnly7CD fClt pu r.ALa ;vr;(voLAI ILE R GiI °Ep.;m 1NG Upttr LS 5 M(v'Kr ll(FSCL :. %OG vEVO1(T'NG UMrT 15 15 Mry KG LVIt, CIL ;ANGC Umrr 1S �u MGjKC rL:lt Al l NC -'I L'Q1"0 ,A."YI ES Ant (EO ^,N A ,;rl WtIG11T OAS6 . • • •C: L•vtLS a: s ; t;wlC`C '. NLY wuCtl r,,P.Af ('Lq lure 13 USCO FOR A GZNMAL0 Ic"T Am jr.r.QN. Milli rnOvl-fC. Tilly !/., -n7 •.f 'JSLQ AS GU:OEU.'IES CNLY. dam APPROVED BY: ^— Page 1 �r,'.fl I Tulle 1)rivc [':l'rtCtt, WA 96208 - 425 356-2000 • FAX 425 356-2626 SCattle 206 292-9059 'ON XV3 S3Id0.1H608dl I00 Wd 60:b0 NOW 10-ZI-M �• ., .. n , •... �nq� ln.� .l, i- . : In I n , . /'1 I.- t . r AnnT n 1v �l -; ICI f�NALY iCAL LAB0r kTORIE5, TNC. _ CEO,-7 . ]CATEC/F`AiJALYSIS. DA1t: 3/12/01 EA.RTN CONSULTANTS, iNC- CCIL JOB #: 103046 130S 136TH PLACc NE, SUITE 201 EELLEVUE, VIA 95005 DATE RECEIVED: 3/ 6101 v^1DOE ACCREDITATION C142 f CONTACT : ROBIN' HAMLC T PROJECT ID: E '_1350 1 t UALITY CGNTROL._RE SULIS SURROGATE RECOVERY Y. RCLb 5UR I0 ANAVIgt ;; �•-u�C 1D 7G N'.VZT N GX TFT 86TFC EPA•8021 62C7.5 tJYJTPH-DX O,IG-01 71 t+WTPH •c:JC TFT �. eo 'r•tti-C2 LPA-6021 C25 91 ;'.G-C2 N•.JTPH-0X J.f�.02 AND DUPLICATE RESULTS BLANK Our .CWIT 041G nt +LlT xnOr AS$OC 5"O'LS pv(nlSu�f A;cOC Sn►lS NO(<S) ND(<S) SA14E P:I-GX (GAS) :030 15.01, 02 NO(<0.1) ND(<0.1) .'. SAME c — ND1030.16-01, 02 ND(<()1) ND(<0.1) "" 5SAME4E(-.0.1) ..-,-S021('l0LUENQ ND(<0.1) 103C-16-01.02 ND(<O.1) ND(<O.1) ••'• SAME . :••:C2.(ETMYl0Eil2) NC)(:U.,) 1030•iG-01.02 ND(<0.3) ND(<0.3) N/A •u0Z1(XYLENL) ND(<0.?), lO3p►6.01, 02 14000 13000 7 SAME 1i-CX (OSL) P G(<=51 1030AG O1, 02 NO <50 ND(<SO) ( ) ,•" SAME 01, 02 Page 1 4Z5 356-2626 ` 5��t11C ^9^ 90:1y 2UG . Rt;7U i:olly f7rivc Lvcrett, WA9;tZt)8 ' 425 3SG-260() 'ON S3ldOiVbOQdl 100 Wd 60:b0 NOW iO-ZI-ddW d SZ:I?SSES"�' Xd3 !c�ir•��n•:in1 u1Jv-1 <• �pl:9l l0/Zl/E D6nTp�otl ANALYTICAL a! LA�oRA70R1ES, INC. CLP: GLTE,rFjANALYSI'S ' _ DATE-. 3/ 12/01 r: EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC- CCiL JOEi :%: 103046 1605 136TH PLACE NE, SUTI-E .01 BELLEW WA 98005 DATE RECE1`1ED: 3i8 `NOOE ACCREDITATION C1414 2 .. CONTACT : ROE?I;`! HAr 1LET P;ZOJECT ID. E IJ2S0-1 C�UAL� 1 Orn3c0L RESULTr:": DUPLICATE RESULTS SPIKE/ SPIKE ASSCCIAtED a• Sptx2 ,/• 5r1KC DUP R4L •h OIFF Rf COYL0.Y 0.ECOVCRY SANPUS y0 SPIKE10 77 NIA N/A 103016-01,02 N/A N/A .rt0� 1 GEniENE 103046-01,02 77 N/A N/A roLuENE 10304G 01, 02 77 N/A N/A rn,nacn:cf+t 10304G-01, 02 77 XYLENE c0i 1 • • I • "/aRVU NOT REPORTED FOR VALUES <XS TIHE REPORTING LIMIT APPROVED BY:—�""i---- -- Page 2 vcr� tt, WA 96--05 • 425 356-2600 • FAX 425 356-2626 • SEaltle 206 292-`)0.59 S62U Holly DrivC • 1; _,U d r� 9.��rON i{�� SS12101�Jt109�1 I0� Wd OI:po fiOW IO-ZI-�VW :nl In/7-t++' pwntwDo}J HSF UUI'LOING AUG / 3 2001 August 1, 2001 Ms. Jeannine L. Graf Building Official, C. B. O. City of Edmonds 121-5t' Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Change or Address — Second and James Building Permit # 2001-0444 Dear Ms. Graf, I am the owner of the property at the northeast corner of Second and James Street. The building is in construction pursuant to the above -reference Building Permit. I request a change of street address from 131 Second Avenue South to 123 Second Avenue South. The address requested appears to be within the appropriate address range for that portion block. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact Judith Shulman at 425-921-1750. Thank you for your consideration. Two Union Square, Suite 5523, 601 Union Street, Seattle, WA 98101 PH 2O6-622-4555 FAX 206-628-3201 WEB www.ellenswood.com Email Office: hsf601 Qaol.com Home: ellenswood®gateway.com Knaak, Lara _. From: Knaak, Lara Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:01 AM To: 'hsf601@aol.com' Subject: Address Change I received your request to change your new office building from 131 2nd Ave South to 123 2nd Ave South. Your request has been granted. I will forward this information to all applicable city divisions (fire, police, streets, building, engineering, planning and utility billing). The owner is responsible to inform all other interested parties, including the post office. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Lara Iulaak Permit Coordinator Development Services Division City of Edmonds 425.771.0220 X1703 r al E i DA Zone C/F S.E. 1/4, SEC. 23 T.27N., R.3 E.W.M. 21 jlaS 15/ ZKd nits 0 dp�o 12 ?j Z hC� S . PU6ET SOUND P`� �� 996e y� •.o ,• 3�z u c k • 0 • LlN 0 LJ F R �D� J3 3�6 9 yo3 9i i;Jf • • • • • �O 9 °O 9p6 /0 500 400 JSao �o'' eq eAKwgrER300 9 i I SCALE 1,V IrrE'T �J �a FDA �L �w4reR 23 TRAIL �F My/N v O pt f4 Qe�QU P� � \0 � � q�ti � �i �♦ / �2i i3P6 . crynonrrs � �� QP �� ♦ e°�y ti a°' Pp ��° �� as F�SrIIN4 PIER ,�a• OPe ,�s �/ � ST ,,� ,2 c �4 � .. ♦via" //��Cr° "� / g `` "' i �\"ice .� �oq � �O'�2 J ,�• 3�� ti~ ? PrbA ',Op i' ✓,9/�J/ /3a � /a P? �b Mry p, \ io B oLTnRe r O� �i °'? y 46 o z3 iz y tiro~ �•r`' ^ gsAc { s ti� 6 l2 �,w ♦0ti w . �[L CAP TAN BANK /•r[ Il5 I pa Q Q• EDMONDS Q�\6 •Cf��O�� Ma. _ CEIVTERF Y , �_.� 14G ly 14S ISO I27. P P� yo5 psi, N M III - ¢ rn avrw .10 IIZ y DAYTON g N Ise Q Q PIACE ,Zo 12.0 S DAYTON ry N wo PMCKINB 1 ST. •Pr pQ NK EDMe/bs R N p � O�.�Q• '!,f 4'r Iq0 M 110 WASTLWATER ry �oTM �' aZ 203 n�j M 7 P v STA. t P /TREATMcn7 (MMONDS 210 Z04 �' 209 llj �j Q} 3 rLAxlr 2z( 216 2/s 210 ) . ISOob z22 223 220 228 Q / Mg41Ue 22/ � 5 HARBo rloret N �2P9 � 225 232 22S �.• 110 54ugRE F 20 SUNDCMMEN AID" M 22 Q ' 229 Lom S h 130 w 0. Apr. pso Q s, 233 279 30 6 t LOER ST 242 o qrx [rIc q I( SUINSrT47 c 3/4 316 1 aweo 15o O i 304 323 N 318 1rrn 250 25125 3IO 3, 1 \ — « 324 SUB U3 02 s 11 i Ix -i 328 325 STA 410 B 1 s WILDLIFE 338 wArcA272 7 271 4t0 1 c 16b NALLVOW r II o aeFuce 34G 34g a41 M �3 ° t0°KTS S 424! x 404 402 ALNUT ST. — — —TK 91011.4W/1y m _.. 414 412 410408 4o9 404 pli v 512 5, j �4 FAeriu4 420 917 p p WILDLIFE I y ,514 J SI / COMONDS PARK SOVNOVIEI'V S/! REN4E I 40pqucgre I APT. 424 APT q 53O �f071csn IIAUS i Of EUM O CITY OF EDMONDS �s,. 1890 1215TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS • WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 httpV/www.ci.edmonds.wa.us RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: A two story office building with underground parking garage. Grading of approximately 25,000 cubic yards is anticipated for the entire project. The property is located at the northeast comer of 2nd Ave. S. and James St. and is zoned Community Business (BC). (City of Edmonds File No. ADB-2000-102) Proponent: Hugh S. Ferguson Location of proposal, including street address if any: northeast corner of 2nd Ave. S. and James St. Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 19 , 2000. Responsible Official: Position/Title: Phone: Address: Steve Bullock Senior Planner 425-771-0220 City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: IC90 �t. XX You may appeal this determination to ert Chave, Planning Manager, t 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than December 20, 2000, by filing a itten appeal citing the specific factual reasons for the a(ng l. The appeal submittal must also inc de the required fees and mailing list. Please contact the P Division for specific submittal re cements. XX Posted on December 6, 200the Edmonds Public L' Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. RECEIVED FEB 13 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Page 1 of 2 00102ED'DOC CREATED ON DECEMBER 6. 2000 12:36 PM ' �r Mailed to the following along with use Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation TSM&P/Land Developer 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133 XX Community Transit Attn.: Brent Russell 1133 164th Street Southwest, #200 Lynnwood, WA 98037 XX Hugh Ferguson 601 Union St. #4512 Seattle, WA 98101 XX PKJB Architectural Group, P.S. Attn. Kathi Williams 603 Stewart St. #707 Seattle, WA 98101 XX MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: 1. IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE POLICIES OF THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, TRAFFIC MITIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $200 / PEAK PM TRIP, $5,200, IS REQUIRED. Attachments: Environmental Checklist Vicinity Map Site Plans and Elevations Traffic Report prepared October 19, 2000 pc: File No. ADB-2000-102 SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 00102ED.DOC CREATED ON DECEMBER 6. 2000 12:36 PM �A �f EDAf Purpose of Checklist: CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonprojed proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLENIENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: D M,0dD-G 2SEH fF ()// f / 2. Name of applicant: f O61-1 s, 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (mob 3 S. r�.�J/� r2. S f W -70 % S"TTc� , Wfi R 8 Oj Zoo- T-3z/o Page 1 of 24 CHKLMD001-NOV.93 MASIEMSPEA 4. Date checklist prepared: C/' 46'-y(9 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): �CON's-rIZ2- JG 7lotS4 -70 C.-H / �n� r3n/,F CC.f � r r CV/ 77-1 ,1yUUre_ (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. J.s62"-STOS f;� r, 2/L_ 4)IAZ C2 . (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 4461 F .t in k lA 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 2 of 24 CHKLMD001-NOVAS MASTERWFA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 0E NO 6 / Ryy P-�'1 / / (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. .4?d (,1 A /(of CCK? zoo AlQ i / /'1 ! i7 (A) 114 (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 3 of 24 CHKLT.DOC11-NOVAS MAMRVSPEA TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: 54-oP6Z) ZO ` 1,v / y2 ` OF (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? I-Plem, S'/o 1-n"q x, (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 4 of 24 CHUTDC01-NOV-93 MASMMSPEA e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (STAFF COMMENTS) �O0o L4-A. -it7. c91` 6,-KCAvATJ'0?+ �6i'{iFiJ�rcep � APfl-tc�s�t-t-r, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. f.uCA(i.9Tlonr /L�i ,f�f_ .SHU/�F� 5�'e "/-Y" (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 9 9 % 132-,aC. 6ellv��Vg/I; (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 6,1C G�N'STi'uG'770�✓` (1f �fi C t-f - 7'7�'.�ifGiG �'/�/�, GON i�2, SIG t:/A/ (STAFF COMMENTS) Page S of 24 CHKLT.Domi-Nov-93 MASMMSPEA b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: s i TE G✓A IAyG C4�fAT�o�tJ (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A�Q (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. &Z2 (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NOSE (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 6 of 24 CHKLTJ)=I-NOV-93 MASTERWEA c 4r (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NINE (STAFF COMMENTS) (S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. M2 (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. A10 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ay0 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 of24 CHKLT.DMI-NOV-93 MAST'EMPEA (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. /UO44E (STAFF COMMENTS) G Water Runoff (including storm water): d. (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water now into other waters? If so, describe. /20OF 4CJ4 rER TO ,6f-: D£TA/lveD //I/ /I r ,3S x !O x.S k. l/AvL:T- i (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? U so, generally describe, A/ (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: yk'/A GD/lJ S721,,,--770^/ (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 8 of 24 CHKLT.DOCU-NOV-93 MASiEMSPEA 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs _ grass � I ! c1E.4ZED pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? TRZ� i o (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 9 of 24 CHKLT.DC al-NOV-93 MASIER\SPEA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the sites, if any: c (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: IV04,6-4 :5� 9S A 1 birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NDT ,1f�yaw�� (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 24 CHKLT.D=I-NOV-93 MASTERWEA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: &O ZZ (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. .— , _ . _ . %-.. _ _ . _ _ I , � _ (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? N so, generally describe. NOT /��/_y ��'0�%£G? /_,✓i�-[, fu,�'n —o r� M f (lam E� iV �`I 1� /�� L,—� �TT_ 4QCR.5 .9-7-tt. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: H %S :Z2 L-Ir .IA 72 `/ 61' (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 11 of 24 CHKLT.DOC\I-NOV-93 MASPEMSPEA 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. NoiyE' i°Y<'I 0C/S'G-r Gy�c.C. �/y7�►��l �/U� L �J��iC� �lyvl�c�N��Ni (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? �TlD, G4/ G ,%?Al �Pn�4I7 NO/S (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 12 of 24 CHUT.DOC11-NOV-93 MASIEMSPEA r f (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. A 1,7/ S f. / T (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: //�'�2i• /7 Iq ,.4r (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 7,17Cf'� Shc FT l�fFTo2�4InJT- �If��//V�/ry/ (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 13 of24 CHKLT.D0CU-N0V-93 MASIER\SPEA C. Describe any structures on the site. �000 SQ FT CMS (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? BG (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? D0b-)N7-0tci1V TICS/ti�F�'c Ak f! /7M,57-rUAny e4i t-t4 rE- D S, rC,rs. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 14 of 24 CHKLT.DMI-NOVA3 MASIERWEA r 4r h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? if so, specify. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? /Ic (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing. and projected land uses and plans, if any: �£ GT N1J S SIN/7 20/V �N�� J(J/R 14,e IZS (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.DOC11-NOV-93 Page IS of 24 MAMR%PEA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building materials) proposed? S7-v CC.6? f A /N r,%J A/Vo /%L1 �SOiyr2 �1, (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 24 CHKLT.DMI-NOV-93 MASIEMSPEA b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? '5611-ffi ,t3LO6-mGc 70 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Q-S,L OF ACOF /7 U L A 770/l7 Z /�%% �i4LS /l/V/'�> �il.J F C7'/.Qf! (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? t — fF-7- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? /101y'--- ,&! a GI//L1 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 17 of 24 CHKLT.DOC%I.NOV.93 MASMR%PEA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? /I fL-J 13 LQO,&�- ?0 71 � /VUr,20[>S C 17r91� (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. A110 (STAFF COMMENTS) G Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: &oiy� PRO rtS (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 18 of 24 CHKLT.D001-NOV-93 MASIERWEA t Gr 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or neat to the site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NoN� (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. P�Rr IN6 /ICC'E 4s (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 19 of 24 CHKLT.00C1I-NOV-93 MASiERNSPEA b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? t3V - - - 3 %co cks OW4Y (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? yz 112oR-770 n> OF y (*VD i US�j iv STa2E 7�211G,�5 -f �4rizz�c /# r1iv�,Z (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 20 of 24 CHKLT.D=1-N0V-93 MASMR%SPEA r a f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 059 (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. C%Yl�£�G�i�1� y ��iey/G� ysc�ry (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: No v E, 'Qwt , , ,Wti /Y �� . .96ov (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 21 of 24 CHUTAOMI-NOVA3 MASIERNSPFA 16. Utilities a. Ci ' ities currently available at the site: electricit natural ga water efuse servic ,telephone, anitary sewe septic system, other: 62W.11I, G9�3G (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C/ r�i ��,� �i� ��..�.F� c�arr P✓l�T so tn��e �i /-02 G/ S , �` (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent ec� Geour� P5 Date Submitted Page 22 of 24 CHUT.DOCU-NOV-93 MASIERNSPFA i 109 - 77 01 MgiN zs210 OF N-ss Zoning and Vicinity Map �a 4123 PARKING 145 303 1 PA Attachment 1 File No. ADB-2000-102 2 b 101 b D EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING �..�.a.� If till 121ilzi 2nd AVENUE S. 6 SOUTH JAMES STREET i ' I EOMONDS. WASHINGTON G 1 Now f P I TQ ) 35'•3��'___ — MAX HT VARIANCE 30_'-914' _ _ — MAX ALLOWABLE 1 �— MRL EIDNG I g•.�i4• — — — — I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — AVERAGE GRADE I I I L-._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.L._._._._ . .m--m_ - - - I I REFERENCE DATUM PAWM LE7 I LOW POW — — — — — — — — — — — — — -----------------------J NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE: VS'•P-0' .35•_��4. — MODULATION BONUS MAX ALLOWABLE HT — AVERAGE GRADE — REFERENCE DATUM LOW POINT- 14B6' SOUTH ELEVATION L SCALE: VS'.I'-0' Feb 06 04 11:47a CASCADE TESTING 425-823-2203 P-1 -pod= cs910! Poara�lt ,yteogtaadc a411*q! (w �annew arty Rmuoodm anonm000 srsgf► aoaaodt� omeuadd aaopoiifi t poaann *QV blvaw03 14 �dum i0mt ao poAtesana► so xtsms�aoo W lox �aI a aRt JO tnomnosd Ngamatmp" ot� aql Pm -aqa Pa+►c a '� ptw oastd poeoJtlai Q* p��MOO PcP a1 W! too vrd oq1 0! Aoml �Fq Jo p'q . 3T 03 Vuv Ito M�� K � psi` ! �aPt� �! T(t lapeta fa!j 090 of IQ a 1paai" to" A*Uap w uooiad=. m Aojsod�m t*14'� ash ><toda�[ laopaoq�� Is w axiall asasmaogaaomaa ty} Wpot>af goo �(tt Ps* �u!swg `t oir ot11_ Aq faalwglma p� P°�tl - �PeAfowa,mn !o pawtvt u gm aammio Man w taodaw - t m o oa a mogo3ol olgvopdde sgr�►QPam We& � �Aaa�! Pao Pow aq mw Ipm POPAmp n a FTC wtn Jo N� 1�M 41YA Alr a� gapas+J lirRa �tom►!t unvaod® aqJ OUGON AAA RPwoA 'I' -,os?odaal jU.WWH /413 � 44 M2�-W Joaaca O" xA gj1A�► Mpgof aq; v tart>sa� UM Momu =ML ' a1 a. •P R� J" Qum a i. �Ea opedog Apa "dW3 IF -Iw1atzm so m ev. got Apdnuud w so=d6m tv!ooda aqt Jo .4tq? M aq mp IMP V b a8�iga'mw �aoga'wp taetd �.y° Prujo gQmme s41 A3'� of da+a! ttaaada aR►Jo aAuq pttpvtawll a411a4a �tmetu . �Ctauatti t m �µosu wa tau stay >R< m may! qm r 3f0 Pa lW"ttlOo oqt jo aoccau: wa!P�F Al 01 �m4! oOQoa laNq Q� o�°ad L . wall a)ao�-ti Jst 4 'Z so moudw mp pug X!ft oW Aq 1�� Vow paoaat�o s up q mg Aq pi said *MR 10 'Am J! urtd a+u�+r► a � � '* sRamo town m va *oil we w sctaodtuc ptnds op i� $wa*saa--aotq'anoaapo • uo Posen OR o1 On Boa' q Iep�S '�� of Ptt m< as Afm t m oq A m t;. � l AN" d ( tt? '3 a n m Io rao!ruoad delitt�tnot •t�+!i P B1Pm PoA&I&h aq, qiU. wmwumPoa JO) 4w* 0110 vtp a�tQo RM 1cn Pa W4 -I �!K►Qtlo3 °� P� LI �>� bat �P! tam I" &nWg p0 wat*!�S *%!x too raogatatos P! k+[p II*� a�osaadoan itr�,ods A*gAW 1 PPW 00 01 taavra J® 1wF; 9T A9 Po aq1 l�1a q a atnopaodam Pm (sue 1 Pit M sad !teat imod ! Ism& par imwwo Pop awp qu :Qmni as Woo ,aIim V Affimat •�mnaop t�g1O� Do4�+� � ! _ jo !i �N �Vlb � k [ / �I c„.poCad o41, .cNZNZnf)v ONUM GMv MOLIOUSNOI WOW SURONCM do AID Cl 1 MVd E/Z 30Vd so.or eAO1f:.7o�.Aa�• 11dIS- 1 VO-t•833 !9aN 063 :'mr 1N `•INVOZ:OI VO 11 93d `•OOVLVVLSZV `•SONOW03 :A8 Feb 06 04 11:47a CASCADE TESTING 425-823-2203 p.2 'ld3a JNinne MOZ l 1833 ®3AI303N )O o /;7o/TQ ,.,u vlod"� f wo vUwVnH'VI-3 FZWo Do ddrt,�,'bV -IuMOASO g;l7fo OWVWNW pw pawl pVj qt!& 4dm' bt Sa.8a pro POW 8LOMOU27MON)DY •ootw�eagi»de pw stud q Do nw=j!nbw voPndnt} rel"& apt I" Pwmj )o $MIR3n so AMOo OKL •vauj&w nnp3odw p:pods PUN llsqV IMSO oq1 n l UU" Woonl Jo PollRan jo In.Uo® No jo DQKo 3=00ad ou •po daww pn palmmUd moq DAW4 vow SM ftiwq'*m r„odat uon3adau. (studs App*n III x� A0bV&N�OP 'J T Odle +�a ppmo ompit ma �Cande�p jo o1pDf�J aanl 'f -1opw8M Rrbds 2* jo lag w °DP!PPt �! sa�l�►!1X �i�A UVo so alwo oop ;==mid of jopd plupvgo oq Pwft arsaar�o aotp� otu wolf �■um l} OAN �. aq IRIP LM! P� to ow POP jMWw Qlaa widdt pW aspodoR M*a& jMMNl t MMM'knbw ooamdsq p!w& wnc umwdsa! p ��! M=MAY • c � hoar mjod m �rn�q°_ _ 4° awe rp�oow o�sgL • P! * '�q poomgrc sw000t v m " as a "W m wa. 'O 5! JWWW2 *U apaoaz vopn&q pFwg WMI T adngof mo v sund pa►n�aa. q sOXE opodatq r!als Hp aQV)►QN� JQJ OjqpWdW •1 wqj gum p"GidaY *I *p»Y *PtM+d 'L .1=4 d up UKa jopM arts wq of r^ nq sopodem PM& ow:v of =Now ov dq pvu►w 09 UM a*= "Wbo' -;v h-! FPO&"as Paq90 *M =;Powx do Pa R* pomwds so ao puma to pw am w r" aw" =0 *ON 'sowwm F!W& iq dpeot tE"=,qm =MAR epode 6* 4" as go P .4w aw a q q loi�6 � �pwH •i Z/Z 3OVd 'NdZS={ VO-P-93.1 �QO➢�111$ZC M .a. SaNO��a AO .NN3 S/S 30Vd `•NVOZ:OI VO-LL-83d `•OOVFVVLSZV `S WQ 3S DATE FILE # SITE PLAN CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION CP to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS ✓' LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ✓ RECEIPT # SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: �� hh HEARING DATE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE DAL� }�UPP�-�_ PHONE 77,j, Q( 6 ADDRESS E)o3 BF-L 4,, 5T EF-j"y�'[ 1 ZIP CODE 2b0Zp ARCHITECT/DESIGNER �� ,��"T< �� Assn. PHONE :7%?-) 0=5Z1 ADDRESS P 23 4 t�M0AJ PS WN 80Z O PROPERTY ADDRESS ,6UcAjye, OorH ZONING F3G LEGAL DESCRIPTION '( ��7tSZ'(-1 R-trY 22� OF 1�oT? �'2'O62- W(M 1.-ES� 2z 23 24 • 6IE(f=h!! "�s e195T AQ0( Tc dy�1 To r t rq ca=- E7_0A,o &Tps PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1. Building Plans - Preliminary 1-. Final Site Plan *A- Landscape Plan iL. Elevations 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Z� °'o UlT�ifZ.E►-i�t_Y �Z)%�IGE �� OEM �0142;il "Mu APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT ± JAnsIa—Y 19 M ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK (2 AA00: ,,5 RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in wholebr in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per- mission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. (Sign ture of Applicant) EHIROPIMEIJTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.31C RC%N', requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from thc'proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions ror Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental aplen- cics use .this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal arc significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zonin,a, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if ;you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist vou. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The aplenty to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checkiist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: A P961AMWAe'r PPoPO54c(. fbr, Ai,3 CM-tCE- 1ZE51Dc�TtAL_ COMPL.� 2. Name of applicant: AA z0LP A. P' TweR.. i ASSo• '530 Fjtzt.'5�.� SvtTE f OOvl 77"2 -0655 3. Address and phone number e�-alicaat awd contact person: K� /VV-�Zcto s A Asso. P a (�o-� 23h Epna ales, 778 •o �zq 4. Date checklist prepared: A-360S (O i 9$7 - 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY (ST ,�piLLo't.�•OS PL�4v—u3� DG`lo�iL7� • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable); APP2OYL l 2 ✓1 M- 1,IrK 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ND. 8. List any environmental information you i;no%+ abour brat has bzfen prepared, or be prepared, directly related to this proposal. x N�/ 9. Do you know whether applications :trc pending for , oyernmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal" if yes, explain. Nv- 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. C iPQ� /Wo►.�T�S : PU4>JNl�TZs� QUCrt 1ZlA17r� fi.T�• f3.� fjUl�DiaJ3-� r i� iYL4�zs�-4u-� c7c. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) ��9� A•sD AVID To �R.1 S?'WbI S72v G•rv'2c Ot.) l Zc) � � I.4 Z t S t To . przoJe�7-l- aF 5A6 Ati� Palk-1 &A-aA6e' cL7_V2E t-4aysc 5 Paces I r 41?3 V: of - a�cccs ,�.>o Pia <<„th,- , 5> � icam, A,•*o L39P&-P_ UQ(Ts. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 0 131 1> Svu(FI , tE 04wr_>S , WA.. 0 71is�13-b'R,TI-1 - �S7cR C.c ( C07Z IJC-7L 4V 2^'_ A0 .5 • A tJD JA MOS 'SZ - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ..C- 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat <EDhilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? &EDJOZA" 4 -G % w17,4 ,E7CC.-_-P72,7J 6F &)6- 3' r3dAJlc OhJ PAaT QF P,e�45a-ry -2- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note ;tny prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading_ pro- posed. Indicate source of (ill. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PW .,vkTi o7J �S& QUA U q C�3t1�Jzc� c'fl �me. PGAcc.uc-xn' 67F �rA)&5 A,Yl-> V�,JD& t�0,� lWk fk b- . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (four example, asphalt or buildings)'? ICJ% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: W 'SITG rz.F,-T=-- JTroJ SysTcA • 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'' If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. �57zvG7v�1 — b. Are there any off —site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No>vE rU�c-D . -3- TO nl: ('UNJPL.LTIih BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water bode on or in the irrtmcdiate vicinity of the site (including year—round and seasonal streams, saltwaicr, lakes, ponds. wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No . ?) \Vill the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. �10 . 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. Nv�,ia- 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdra"-als or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. t C) 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; ctc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. �lp/1A.a��o5 S�ST�. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY -4- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water (low? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Fv4dk3(-k)ATeR- ?-t-Q 0FT-- Fe0 AA T2.00r= w L LL, P240r-e'f)G -Co P,eto2 7o C>t 5 ci+A &f'= t �JTO C Izy 'S�o 2w� 5yS-r eM 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. moo• d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _ shrubs ✓grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓other types of vegetation 5eV42-y d11`1tS b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? W37rAM P 6724S5 � VI 5 To &F-: (2�61L aVj:- D c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 0'f� t�* tiA-M,-S PS Ar,.�0 Bot.3 c)e0 aY A-p?LleA ., 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been' observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: _ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: ............................ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -5- TO BE COMPLETED BY 411111LICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? if so, explain. Q rL) , I'VALUATION FOR AGENCY USI: ONJ.%* d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Enerby and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe \whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Yl-rG-CtZtG-4>✓ATt►-2,�kt fL Cc�rJ ©i Tco� t 06- Ah �CPi�/ZU P2trkk7e✓ —IC) use'5 • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N a. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: S1F1rCtAL_ 69-tA.7.10r/ /NScJ[.�T� . F4.6da- SYs7c ius . 7. Environmental Health a. .Are there an), environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk - of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N 6 Jr. . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Qwe /U=-ZF'De�. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Q%Y LA&Wr T2�4i`r-IG 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short—term or a long—term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. StAT CO.,,, tfWc•TC O>'J . lj - Jr�, : 00 Cr TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: S. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Wfft�5��lGE� ID C� . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONL1' c. Describe any structures on the site. oNe� Tz-( 5T2 U Cru'126 : % LLM"� kt itz ) �z d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? �=�,tiW�-Z-r�.Jir v�r �-X. t 5T /�llr 572v�-7v2c e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? BC g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? To 50 — &o ' L1J C — UP To l Z j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? t-4004F— k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses. and plans, if any: �El//EZJ 0� PIzO eJ�GT f3f G/rY Cliff/G/<1 L5� A ell/z,61J lz ie;0 64A-2P, A-,-w d-F V/0 ,LPL 1CAAJr5 :5yd&� 1-0 r--W Se 2E ZNc CJ M PA7-113ic17,1 OF -TNa t Jlrffc6e5.-7- TO Ill: ('CININ-FTLU I I Y AITI.IC'ANT 9. Housing a. Approximate)\, ho).\• mane units would be provided, if am'? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No,J - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: No" �VC�r- > 4 2:,- D. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? '56'k77A_&Le-rPaurT. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? PATzTA-L vle;o At��47iu7J //J A ecuPL6 0f 1o_'%{AJce'5. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: %ZA✓/rW 6 y Girt Ze?'J 4!5VtCZcJ /S4rA,2D. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? M W 1 /441 4- a2t L)" / i-I-OM J aJA-710,J 0=747'Z D,92K. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect ;your proposal? 141./0_AJE . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal rccrcational`op ortunitics"are in the immediate vicinity? C izy p.4 /L�- — Dcr�rtJ'Toc�r�J t trn rpox� 5�'lv�i�i vPr - -jam iAJ 574redN1 �sTG, elc b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO RE CONIPLETED BY APPLIC.A.NT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op portunitics to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Q (xT� t�12S / �J CDM tit orb W 1 u. 14� 72F IAJ 1>0VZ QtTtOoVR- Mlc ' .42c— 5 4-r1 eZQF C-ry pizo po5c—o P/ZvJt--�Z 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Nv. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next .to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: /LJO� AJzEt:�,P�7�. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop'? e.. How many parkins spaces would the completed project have'? How many would the project eliminate". "t" �j0 QZ136 EEL IA lLIAT��- d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways". If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). CUB -$IOE (.tT�et-K- ._ e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. TP RzI T2At,J S7ATi�.1 'ice l3CC" AWAY. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project'? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. f2� AVE . Wt'ECGAY T2/PeNDS (Fievm t. T. B• T,PaP &eat. 947'i,1-1J Ala t R�Li 2n4 eD. 44-V Use cow r 7/0 (rd�z72.rc. JI�Cic� t9�0v., n- EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED 11) APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: �� L l G Y2�*�S C�0'R."jk`r f oyJ CLOSE iSy' 15. Public Ser6ces a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? if so, generally describe. No. - b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. �400F' IJe=-eDF-V 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricM natural gas, ater a use sery ice - elephone anitar� sewe septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. �i.FG7CL1Glty fly _5 p. Co. �t�•D. 1 P6FU5e 15Y Al?a7c C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true nd comp to the best f my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is rel them to make 't ecisi n Signature: .. .. . ............................ Date Submitted: 41L 712i...................................... -10- Lti March 6, 2001 Malcolm Drilling Co. Inc. 7808 S. 207d' Court Kent, WA 98032 ATTENTION: Al Rasband Ground Support PLLC 2475 152ndAvenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Phone (425) 376-0177 Fax (425) 376-0277 www.groundsupport. com Our ref: 01-12 RECEIVED MAR 14 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION RE: EXCAVATION SHORING WALL DESIGN, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Al: Ground Support PLLC is pleased to present to Malcolm Drilling Co. Inc. (MDCI) our design plans, specifications and calculations for the soil nail and cantilever soldier pile shoring walls for the planned Edmonds Office Building Project, Edmonds, Washington. The project background, subsurface conditions, and design approach are each described in the following sections. 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND We have reviewed and based our design on the following project documents: Electronic Drawing File titled "Grading Plan, Edmonds Office Building, Edmonds, Washington" prepared by Bush, Roed and Hitchings, dated February 12, 2001. Electronic Drawing File titled "Edmonds Office Building, 2nd Avenue S and South James Street, Edmonds, Washington 98020". prepared by PKJB Architectural Group, dated February 20, 2001. "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Edmonds Office Building, 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington" prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated August 31, 2000. Based on a review of the architectural, structural and civil drawings and of the geotechnical report, together with a site visit, our understanding of the project is described below. The site is located at the northeast intersection of 2nd Avenue South and James Street, Edmonds, and is bounded by 2nd Avenue to the west, James Street to the south, an alley to the east, and a private property to the north. The property is about 142 feet (north -south) by 120 feet and presently contains a single -story CMU building on its southern half, together with a paved area. INNOVATIVE AND COST EFFECTIVE EXCAVATION SUPPORT DESIGN SOIL NAIL WALLS — ANCHORED PILE WALLS — VENISO SYSTEM - MICROPILE WALLS In Date 2 Project The private property to the north contains a building that is set well back from the common property line. . Across the alley to the east there are several two-story wood frame/CMU buildings. The northernmost of these properties has its southernmost 10 feet supported on footings that are in excess of 20 feet from the proposed east shoring wall. The remaining buildings across the alley are set well back from the alley, with the exception of a single -story garage structure that is located to within about 22 feet of the east shoring wall. For the proposed depths of excavation and the nature of the materials present at the site, none of the adjacent structures should be affected by the planned excavation. The site slopes gently towards the southwest, with an elevation of about 35 feet at the northeast corner decreasing to approximately 30 feet at the west end of the north wall and at the south end of the east wall. The structural drawings show that the excavation will be taken to approximate elevation 16 feet, to accommodate the below grade parking structure. Maximum excavation depth will therefore be about 19 feet in the northeast corner, decreasing to about 14 feet along the north and east walls. It is planned to shore the north and east walls, and lay back temporary construction slopes along the south and west sides of the excavation that are adjacent James Street and 2nd Avenue South, respectively. Site conditions are such that temporary soil nailing is the most economical shoring method. Soil nailing will be used to shore the north wall. The east wall will be supported with a cantilevered wall in order to avoid placing nails below the alley. There are no utilities along the north wall that will be affected by the soil nails, and the cantilevered soldier piles will not impact those utilities that are present beneath the alley. 2. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Earth Consultants, Inc. performed geotechnical site investigations for the planned project and summarized the results of these investigations in their report dated August 31, 2000. The field investigations consisted of 3 geotechnical borings to a maximum depth of 26 feet. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the USCS, and moisture contents were taken on selected samples. The soil borings encountered very dense silty sand and sandy silt glacial till soils, with the upper few feet (less than 5 feet) consisting of medium dense silty sand fill and weathered till. Light to moderate groundwater seepage was encountered below a depth of about 8 feet during the site investigations. 3. DESIGN APPROACH 3.1 Soil Nail Walls We have performed the design in accordance with locally accepted standards of practice for soil nail wall design and in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code and the 1996 FHWA Manual for Design and Construction of Soil Nail Walls. Soil nail wall stability analyses are contained in Appendix A. The stability analyses were performed using proprietary computer program GroundSupport, Version 1.01. Analyses were performed at critical sections along the walls, shown on the elevation drawings (SH3.0 and 3.1). The soil strength values used are: Fill and Weathered Till: Ground Support PLLC Date 3 Project Till: Friction Angle: 34 degrees Cohesion: 50 psf Soil Unit Weight: 125 pcf Ultimate Pullout 3000 plf Friction Angle: 40 degrees Cohesion: 70-95 psf Soil Unit Weight: 135 pcf Ultimate Pullout 8000 plf A live load traffic surcharge of 250 psf was incorporated into the design of the soil nail walls. The results of the analyses provided in Appendix A indicate that No. 9 Grade 75 soil nail threaded bars of maximum length from 14 to 16 feet are required for the shoring walls. The horizontal nail spacing has been set at 8 feet. Appendix B contains spreadsheet calculations for the soil nail wall facing. The analyses indicate that a nominal or ultimate nail head load of about 40 kips will satisfy the design. The facing and the connection system between the nail and the facing therefore must be designed to provide this nominal nail head load. A temporary facing that will provide the required nominal nail head strength is a. 4-inch-thick shotcrete (4 ksi compressive strength) facing reinforced with 4x4 W2.9XW2.9 welded wire mesh, with two No. 4 continuous horizontal waler bars at each row of nails and two No. 4 discontinuous vertical bearing bars at each nail head. The nails are connected to the temporary facing with an 8-inch square by 3/4-inch thick bearing plate and nut. Calculation spreadsheets for flexure and punching shear are shown on Tables B.1 and B.2 respectively. These temporary wall facing details are presented in the Drawings. The Drawings are bound separately from this letter report. Based on the expected ground conditions, approved construction methods are illustrated on sheet SH5.0 and described in the specifications on sheets SH6.0 through SH6.1. 3.2 Cantilever Wall The east shoring wall has been designed as a soldier pile cantilever wall. Stability analyses are provided in Appendix C, for excavated wall heights of 14, 17 and 19 feet. The analysis output shows the applied earth pressure loading on the driving and resisting side of the soldier piles, together with.the distribution of shear force and bending moment along the length of the pile for a pile spacing of 8 feet. The design earth pressures for the cantilever wall are: Active Equivalent Fluid Density: 30 pcf Passive Equivalent Fluid Density 400 pcf The above passive earth pressures include a factor of safety of 1.5. Earth pressures on the passive or resisting side were ignored in the upper two feet below the base of the excavation. Active earth pressures were applied to the full pile spacing above the base of the excavation. Below the base of the excavation, the effective pile width was varied from 2.5/3 feet (i.e., the actual pile width) at the base of excavation to 8 feet (i.e., the pile spacing) at a depth of 5/5.5 feet below the base of excavation. Ground Support PLLC ,. C Date 4 Project In addition to the above earth pressures, a lateral live load surcharge of 60 psf was applied to the active side of the pile. The design earth pressure diagram is given on the plans (Sheet SH4.0). The spreadsheet analysis output shown in Appendix C was obtained by varying the depth of embedment of the pile in order to achieve full force and moment balance of the cantilever pile section. The depth of embedment, together with the maximum shear force and bending moment, were then plotted as a function of the height of the wall (see Sheet SH4.0 of the Drawing set). This figure was then used to estimate the design loadings and pile embedments for the actual pile lengths shown on the East Wall Elevation (Sheet SH3.1). The design pile loads were then used to size the soldier piles. The pile sizes and required depths of embedment are shown on the Drawings. Maximum applied earth pressure for the lagging design is calculated from the equivalent fluid density of 30 pcf and the 60 psf live load lateral surcharge, to be about 600 psf. The facing will consist of a 4-inch- thick (4 ksi) shotcrete reinforced with welded wire mesh and horizontal waler steel, and connected to the soldier piles by welded headed studs embedded within the shotcrete. The design calculations are presented in Appendix D and the design details shown on the Drawings. 4. CLOSURE We trust that the above shoring wall wall design is in accordance with your needs at this time. We have enjoyed working with you on this project and will continue to support you in addressing design review comments, in working with your selected contractor to address any issues he might have, and in dealing with other issues that might occur during construction. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, -,o GROUND SUPPO P� z 19434 R. John e, P.E., �'P Partner SIDN�G EXPIRES aocumenu Ground Support PLLC APPENDIX A SOIL NAIL WALL DESIGN CALCULATIONS Ground Support PLLC 0 .. Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni 19-foot cut 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 L- -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 J 1, Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [General Data] 19-foot cut Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe angle (deg) = 20.0 X-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 [LRFD and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.35 FS soil friction = 1.35 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 95 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 5 '- Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes) X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 14 0 19 30 19 30 14 0 9.5 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Surch_Loads] Node 1 PI Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 [Nails] X Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Fixed Horiz. C Coord Coord Length ation Strength Strength Nail? Spacing Me 0 16 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 0 10 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 0 4 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 p1 Node 2 p2 Angle 1 .5 6 1 0 6 1 3 1 0 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 13.98 Nail Head Factor = 2.76 Nail Tendon Factor = 32117.65 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 13.97 49014.31 26 2 13.96 57552.36 31 3 9.13 41335.30 44 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 1 -65.59 55.60 1.39. 81.58 3.14 2 -69.58 58.98 1.48 81.58 3.30 3 -103.41 87.65 2.08 81.58 4.30 4 -48.44 46.30 1.95 78.16 5.00 5 -52.80 50.46 2.15 78.16 5.30 6 -72.92 69.70 2.80 78.16 6.10 7 -42.10 45.35 2.89 74.74 7.43 8 -57.75 62.21 3.63 74.74 8.38 9 -92.59 99.73 4.40 74.74 9.11 10 -28.54 34.68 2.91 71.32 9.11 11 -35.04 42.58 3.67 71.32 9.19 12 -46.79 56.86 4.46 71.32 9.87 13 -73.00 88.70 5.34 71.32 10.47 14 -24.31 33.42 3.66 67.89 10.47 15 -29.60 40.69 4.49 67.89 10.58 16 -40.13 55.17 5.43 67.89 11.11 17 -63.99 87.98 6.47 67.89 11.55 18 -21.02 32.85 4.50 64.47 11.55 19 -25.93 40.53 5.46 64.47 11.91 20 -34.82 54.43 6.47 64.47 12.26 21 -57.18 89.38 7.68 64.47 12.54 22 -18.48 33.08 5.48 61.05 12.54 23 -22.93 41.06 6.54 61.05 13.06 24 -31.25 55.94 7.66 61.05 13.06 25 -51.78 92.69 8.98 61.05 13.06 26 -16.19 33.55 6.53 57.63 13.43 27 -20.41 42.28 7.68 57.63 13.43 28 -28.24 58.50 8.97 57.63 13.43 29 -47.22 97.82 10.39 57.63 13.43 30 -11.90 28.94 6.54 54.21 13.43 31 -14.16 34.44 7.69 54.21 13.50 32 -18.19 44.26 9.00 54.21 13.50 33 -25.75 62.65 10.44 54.21 13.50 34 -45.83 111.48 12.07 54.21 13.61 35 -10.21 29.77 7.71 50.79 13.61 36 -12.37 36.09 8.99 50.79 13.61 37 -16.06 46.84 10.45 50.79 13.61 38 -23.15 67.51 12.03 50.79 13.79 39 -43.71 127.47 13.89 50.79 13.90 40 -7.35 26.49 7.72 47.37 13.90 41 -8.60 30.98 9.03 47.37 13.90 42 -10.58 38.12 10.46 47.37 13.90 43 -13.99 50.43 12.08 47.37 13.90 44 -20.94 75.48 13.90 47.37 13.98 45 -42.11 151.79 15.97 47.37 13.98 46 -5.88 27.46 9.03 43.95 13.98 47 -6.98 32.60 10.47 43.95 13.98 48 -8.71 40.69 12.09 43.95 13.98 49 -11.76 54.92 13.91 43.95 13.98 50 -17.92 83.71 15.89 43.95 13.98 51 -36.55 170.71 16.12 43.95 13.98 52 -4.38 28.74 10.50 40.53 13.98 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 53 -5.26 34.55 12.10 40..53 13.98 -54 -6.68 43.85 13.92 40.53, 13.98 55 -9.18 60.24 15.94 40.53 13.98 56 -14.46 94.89 18.20 40.53 13.98 57 -29.17 191.44 20.52 40.53 13.98 58 -2.38 25.93 10.50 37.11 13.98 59 -2.78 30.31 12.10 37.11 13.98 60 -3.39 36.94 13.92 37.11 13.98 61 -4.36 47.57 15.95 37.11 13.98 62 -6.10 66.44 18.21 37'.11 13.98 63 -9.75 106.31 20.72 37.11 13.98 64 -19.49 212.38 23.33 37.11 13.98 65 -0.87 27.21 12.10 33.68 13.98 66 -1.02 32.20 13.93 33.68 13.98 67 -1.26 39.76 15.96 33.68 13.98 68 -1.65 51.82 18.22 33.68 13.98 69 -2.30 72.48 20.67 33.68 13.98 70 -3.74 117.60 23.53 33.68 13.98 71 -7.36 231.41 26.41 33.68 13.98 72 0.69 24.84 12.11 30.26 13.98 73 0.80 28.74 13.93 30.26 13.98 74 0.96 34.40 15.96 30.26 13.98 75 1.20 42.91 18.22 30.26 13.98 76 1.58 56.50 20.75 30.26 13.98 77 2.24 80.15 23.56 30.26 13.98 78 3.60 128.91 26.72 30.26 13.98 79 6.88 246.35 29.96 30.26 13.98 80 2.29 26.09 13.93 26.84 13.98 81 2.68 30.51 15.97 26.84 13.98 82 3.24 36.88 18.23 26.84 13.98 83 4.08 46.40 20.70 26.84 13.98 84 5.39 61.31 23.49 26.84 13.98 85 7.63 86.80 26.72 26.84 13.98 86 4.09 27.55 15.97 23.42 13.98 87 4.83 32.51 18.19 23.42 13.98 88 5.88 39.61 20.71 23.42 13.98 89 7.43 50.05 23.51 23.42 13.98 90 9.81 66.09 26.63 23.42 13.98 91 5.30 25.21 15.97 20.00 13.98 92 6.13 29.19 18.19 20.00 13.98 93 7.29 34.71 20.72 20.00 13.98 94 8.93 42.50 23.53 20.00 13.98 95 11.29 53.7.4 26.66 20.00 13.98 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni 19-foot cut intermediate construction 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 L- -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [General Data] 19-foot cut intermediate construction Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe angle (deg) = 20.0 X-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 [LRFD.and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.2 FS soil friction = 1.2 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 ; 95 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord I i This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 i I Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes] X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 14 0 19 30 19 30 14 0 9.5 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Surch_Loads] Node 1 pi Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 [Nails] X Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Fixed Horiz. C Coord Coord Length ation Strength Strength Nail? Spacing Me 0 16 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 0 10 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 1 .5 6 1 0 6 1 3 1 0 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 16.29 Nail Head Factor = 4.40 Nail Tendon Factor = 42068.95 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 16.29 66557.80 29 2 15.71 76508.90 29 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center Ilcept angle Factor 1 -61.42 58.05 1.44 81.58 4.40 2 -64.15 .60.63 1.54 81.58 4.76 3 -45.09 48.03 2.01 78.16 7.55 4 -47.84 50.96 2.18 78.16 7.91 5 -65.36 69.62 2.82 78.16 8.70 6 -38.09 45.76 2.88 74.74 9.90 7 -51.73 62.15 3.65 74.74 10.53 8 -81.45 97.85 4.37 74.74 10.89 9 -25.86 35.13 2.91 71.32 11.12 10 -31.56 42.88 3.66 71.32 11.61 11 -41.79 56.78 4.49 71.32 11.98 12 -69.68 94.67 5.45 71.32 12.22 13 -21.86 33.75 3.66 67.89 12.65 14 -26.49 40-90 4.48 67.89 12.91 15 -35.60 54.97 5.46 67.89 13.13 16 -55.91 86.32 6.44 67.89 13.21 17 -18.75 33.12 4.51 64.47 13.80 18 -22.99 40.62 5.46 64.47 13.92 19 -30.62 54.11 6.50 64.47 14.01 20 -49.49 87.44 7.65 64.47 14.01 21 -16.21 33.10 5.47 61.05 15.02 22 -20.08 41.02 6.53 61.05 15.02 23 -27.22 55.59 7.71 61.05 15.02 24 -44.25 90.37 8.95 61.05 15.02 25 -14.01 33.54 6.53 57.63 15.62 26 -17.58 42.09 7.72 57.63 15.62 27 -24.11 57.73 9.01 57.63 15.62 28 -39.70 95.04 '10.36 57.63 15.62 29 -10.09 28.90 6.53 54.21 16.29 30 -12.01 34.41 7.70 54.21 16.29 31 -15.33 43.91 9.05 54.21 16.29 32 -21.57 61.78 10.44 54.21 16.29 33 -37.99 108.81 12.07 54.21 16.29 34 -8.42 29.72 7.72 50.79 16.29 35 -10.16 35.83 9.03 50.79 16.29 36 -13.12 46.29 10.50 50.79 16.29 37 -18.74. 66.09 12.02 50.79 16.29 38 -36.75 129.65 14.00 50.79 16.29 39 -6.78 30.81 9.04 47.37 16.29 40 -8.32 37.81 10.52 47.37 16.29 41 -10.92 49.65 12.08 47.37 16.29 42 -16.24 73.82 13.90 47.37 16.29 43 -31.77 144.45 15.93 47.37 16.29 44 -4.31 27.29 9.03 43.95 16.29 45 -5.10 32.24 10.50 43.95 16.29 46 -6.34 40.11 12.09 43.95 16.29 47 -8.52 53.86 13.91 43.95 16.29 48 -12.83 81.17 15.87 43.95 16.29 49 -25.55 161.63 18.16 43.95 16.29 50 -2.77 28.46 10.50 40.53 16.29 51 -3.32 34.08 12.14 40.53 16.29 52 -4.19 43.07 13.91 40.53 16.29 53 -5.73 58.86 15.94 40.53 16.29 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\19 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 54 -8.97 92.06 18.19 40.53 16.29 55 -17.57 180.39 20.57 40.53 16.29 56 -0.96 25.69 10.50 37.11 16.29 57 -1.12 29.92 12.14 37.11 16.29 58 -1.36 36.31 13.92 37.11 16.29 59 -1.73 46.36 15.91 37.11 16.29 60 -2.42 64.66 18.21 37.11 16.29 61 -3.84 102.68 20.72 37.11 16.29 62 0.60 26.87 12.14 33.68 16.29 63 0.71 31.66 13.92 33.68 16.29 64 0.87 38.91 15.95 33.68 16.29 65 1.13 50.53 18.22 33.68 16.29 66 1.58 70.90 20.73 33.68 16.29 67 2.57 114.92 23.61 33.68 16.29 68 2.32 28.28 13.93 30.26 16.29 69 2.77 33.71 15.96 30.26 16.29 70 3.44 41.88 18.22 30.26 16.29 71 4.51 54.89 20.75 30.26 16.29 72 6.37 77.46 23.56 30.26 16.29 73 10.10 122.83 26.67 30.26 16.29 74 18.90 229.84 29.88 30.26 16.29 75 3.67 25.69 13.97 26.84 16.29 76 4.27 29.93 15.97 26.84 16.29 77 5.14 36.01 18.23 26.84 16.29 78 6.44 45.12 20.76 26.84 16.29 79 8.47 59.36 23.57 26.84 16.29 BO 11.93 83.60 26.72 26.84 16.29 81 5.52 27.02 15.97 23.42 16.29 82 6.49 31.76 18.24 23.42 16.29 83 7.87 38.54 20.77 23.42 16.29 84 9.90 48.49 23.51 23.42 16.29 85 13.02 63.77 26.63 23.42 16.29 86 6.61 24.75 15.97 20.00 16.29 87 7.62 28.52 18.24 20.00 16.29 88 9.03 33.78 20.72 20.00 16.29 89 11.01 41.19 23.53 20.00 16.29 90 13.87 51.90 26.66 20.00 16.29 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 .Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 16-foot cut -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 L This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [General Data] 16-foot cut Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe angle (deg) = 20.0 X-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 [LRFD and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.35 FS soil friction = 1.35 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 80 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes] X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 11 0 16 30 16 30 11 0 8 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Surch_Loads] Node 1 pi Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 [Nails] X Coord 0 0 0 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 1 6 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Coord Length ation Strength Strength 14 1 15 50000 10000 9 1 15 50000 10000 4 1 15 50000 10000 pl Node 2 p2 Angle .5 6 1 0 1 3 1 0 Fixed Horiz. Nail? Spacing I 0 8 0 8 0 8 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 13.86 Nail Head Factor = 1.78 Nail Tendon Factor = 24173.10 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 13.87 34046.13 24 2 11.87 44069.54 28 3 7.18 33052.15 28 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center Ilcept angle Factor 1 -95.12 71.32 0.91 85.00 1.60 2 -66.56 56.42 1.50 81.58 3.02 3 -37.81 36.14 1.56 78.16 3.87 4 -50.68 48.44 2.12 78.16 4.64 5 -85.35 81.58 2.83 78.16 5.91 6 -29.37 31.63 1.97 74.74 5.91 7 -31.56 34.00 2.20 74.74 5.91 8 -42.00 45.24 2.85 74.74 7.03 9 -67.88 73.12 3.62 74.74 9.58 10 -26.93 32.73 2.89 71.32 9.58 11 -35.60 43.26 3.64 71.32 11.33 12 -55.18 67.05 4.42 71.32 11.80 13 -23.47 32.27 3.65 67.89 11.88 14 -31.89 43.84 4.51 67.89 12.07 15 -49.00 67.36 5.37 67.89 12.21 16 -16.92 26.44 3.66 64.47 12.21 17 -20.88 32.64 4.51 64.47 12.36 18 -28.29 44.23 5.42 64.47 12.71 19 -46.36 72.47 6.48 64.47 12.86 20 -15.01 26.87 4.51 61.05 13.00 21 -18.67 33.42 5.44 61.05 13.38 22 -25.74 46.07 6.46 61.05 13.38 23 -44.95 80.46 7.69 61.05 13.38 24 -13.36 27.69 5.46 57.63 13.78 25 -16.97 35.16 6.52 57.63 13.78 26 -24.17 50.07 7.68 57.63 13.78 27 -41.87 86.74 8.93 57.63 13.78 28 -9.84 23.93 5.46 54.21 13.86 29 -11.89 28.92 6.53 54.21 13.86 30 -15.48 37.67 7.69 54.21 13.86 31 -22.45 54.62 8.98 54.21 13.86 32 -42.76 104.01 10.44 54.21 13.86 33 -8.55 24.95 6.53 50.79 13.86 34 -10.49 30.60 7.71 50.79 13.86 35 -13.88 40.48 8.98 50.79 13.86 36 -20.95 61.11 10.45 50.79 13.86 37 -44.07 128.53 12.12 50.79 13.86 38 -7.28 26.26 7.71 47.37 13.86 39 -9.09 32.78 8.99 47.37 13.86 40 -12.32 44.40 10.45 47.37 13.86 41 -19.45 70.11 12.11 47.37 13.86 42 -41.11 148.18 13.81 47.37 13.86 43 -4.98 23.26 7.71 43.95 13.86 44 -5.98 27.92 9.00 43.95 13.86 45 -7.61 35.53 10.46 43.95 13.86 46 -10.55 49.28 12.09 43.95 13.86 47 -17.12 79.96 13.90 43.95 13.86 48 -36.68 171.32 15.77 43.95 13.86 49 -3.74 24.58 9.04 40.53 13.86 50 -4.57 30.01 10.47 40.53 13.86 51 -5.92 38.86 12.10 40.53 13.86 52 -8.41 55.17 13.92 40.53 13.86 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 53 -14.04 92.18 15.93 40.53 13.86 54 -2.03 22.13 9.04 37.11 13.86 55 -2.40 26.19 10.47 37.11 13.86 56 -2.98 32.45 12.11 37.11 13.86 57 -3.93 42.79 13.93 37.11 13.86 58 -5.62 61.24 15.90 37.11 13.86 59 -9.63 104.91 18.17 37.11 13.86 60 -0.75 23.44 10.48 33.68 13.86 61 -0.89 28.13 12.12 33.68 13.86 62 -1.12 35.34 13.94 33.68 13.86 63 -1.50 47.24 15.97 33.68 13.86 64 -2.20 69.22 18.23 33.68 13.86 65 -3.79 119.23 20.73 33.68 13.86 66 0.60 21.34 10.48 30.26 13.86 67 0.70 24.98 12.12 30.26 13.86 68 0.85 30.35 13.94 30.26 13.86 69 1.08 38.59 15.98 30.26 13.86 70 1.45 52.03 18.23 30.26 13.86 71 .2.14 76.54. 20.75 30.26 13.86 72 3.66 131.13 23.57 30.26 13.86 73 1.99 22.60 12.12 26.84 13.86 74 2.35 26.76 13.95 26.84 13.86 75 2.89 32.86 15.94 26.84 13.86 76 3.70 42.12 18.19 26.84 13.86 77 5.01 57.06 20.71 26.84 13.86 7B 7.35 83.65 23.61 26.84 13.86 79 12.23 139.15 26.73 26.84 13.86 80 3.08 20.73 12.12 23.42 13.86 81 3.57 24.06 13.95 23.42 13.86 82 4.27 28.77 15.95 23.42 13.86 83 5.28 35.59 18.21 23.42 13.86 84 6.80 45.79 20.73 23.42 13.86 85 9.18 61.88 23.54 23.42 13.86 86 13.15 88.61 26.70 23.42 13.86 87 4.61 21.93 13.95 20.00 13.86 88 5.40 25.69 15.95 20.00 13.86 89 6.50 30.95 18.22 20.00 13.86 90 8.07 38.43 20.74 20.00 13.86 91 10.38 49.41 23.56 20.00 13.86 92 13.90 66.19 26.69 20.00 13.86 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 16-foot cut intermediate construction -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [General Data] 16-foot cut intermediate construction Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe angle (deg) = 20.0 X-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 [LRFD and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.2 FS soil friction = 1.2 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 80 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File• C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes] X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 11 0 16 30 16 30 11 0 8 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [ Surch_Loads ] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 '[Nails] X Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Coord Coord Length ation Strength Strength 0 14 1 15 50000 10000 0 9 1 15 50000 10000 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 1 .5 6 1 0 6 1 3 1 0 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis Fixed Horiz. Nail? Spacing 0 B 0 B This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND.SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 Output File: C:\JOBFILS\01-12F-1\16 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 16.32 Nail Head Factor = 3.29 Nail Tendon Factor = 32685.49 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 16.32 51531.54 28 2 12.89 59445.73 28 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 1 -87.03 72.93 0.91 85.00 1.60 2 -59.98 56.69 1.53 81.58 4.27 3 -34.45 36.69 1.55 78.16 5.71 4 -47.03 50.09 2.20 78.16 6.84 5 -75.48 80.39 2.81 78.16 7.60 6 -26.96 32.38 2.00 74.74 7.80 7 -28.66 34.43 2.20 74.74 8.12 8 -37.81 45.43 2.87 74.74 8.92 9 -60.08 72.18 3.60 74.74 9.46 10 -24.33 33.06 2.89 71.32 11.28 11 -31.91 43.35 3.63 71.32 11.81 12 -48.76 66.25 4.45 71.32 11.92 13 -21.05 32.50 3.65 67.89 12.84 14 -28.35 43.76 4.54 67.89 12.84 15 -42.98 66.36 5.40 67.89 12.93 16 -15.07 26.63 3.66 64.47 14.20 17 -18.52 32.72 4.51 64.47 14.20 18 -24.96 44.10 5.46 64.47 14.20 19 -40.48 71.52 6.47 64.47. 14.20 20 -13.16 26.87 4.49 61.05 15.25 21 -16.37 33.43 5.45 61.05 15.25 22 -22.37 45.69 6.50 61.05 15.25 23 -38.38 78.39 7.68 61.05 15.25 24 -11.56 27.68 5.46 57.63 15.56 25 -14.61 34.99 6.52 57.63 15..56 26 -20.63 49.41 7.71 57.63 15.56 27 -35.15 84.16 8.96 57.63 15.56 28 -8.37 23.96 5.46 54.21 16.32 29 -10.06 28.81 6.53 54.21 16.32 30 -12.96 37.11 7.71 54.21 16.32 31 -18.77 53.77 9.02 54.21 16.32 32 -35.26 100.98 10.44 54.21 16.32 33 -7.05 24.86 6.53 50.79 16.32 34 -8.61 30.37 7.71 50.79 16.32 35 -11.34 40.00 9.03 50.79 16.32 36 -16.98 59.89 10.44 50.79 16.32 37 -34.71 122.44 12.09 50.79 16.32 38 -5.74 26.08 7.71 47.37 16.32 39 -7.13 32.41 9.03 47.37 16.32 40 -9.61 43.68 10.45 47.37 16.32 41 -14.98 68.12 12.09 47.37 16.32 42 -30.85 140.27 13.85 .47.37 16.32 43 -3.65 23.11 7.71 43.95 16.32 44 -4.36 27.58 9.02 43.95 16.32 45 -5.53 34.98 10.46 43.95 16.32 46 -7.63 48.25 12.09 43.95 16.32 47 -12.27 77.62 13.90 43.95 16.32 48 -2.37 24.33 9.03 40.53 16.32 49 -2.88 29.55 10.51 40.53 16.32 50 -3.71 38.11 12.10 40.53 16.32 51 -5.24 53.79 13.91 40.53 16.32 52 -8.67 89.02 15.93 40.53 16.32 53 -0.82 21.92 9.04 37.11 16.32 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\16 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center i'cept angle Factor 54 -0.97 25.86 10.52 37.11 16.32 55 -1.19 31.86 12.11 37.11 16.32 56 -1.56 41.80 13.93 37.11 16.32 57 -2.22 59.43 15.89 37.11 16.32 58 -3.75 100.34 18.14 37.11 16.32 59 0.52 23.13 10.51 33.68 16.32 60 0.62 27.63 12.11 33.68 16.32 61 0.77 34.56. 13.93 33.68 16.32 62 1.03 45.98 15.96 33.68 16.32 63 1.49 66.95 18.22 33.68 16.32 64 2.55 114.30 20.73 33.68 16.32 65 1.73 21.07 10.51 30.26 16.32 66 2.02 24.54 12.11 30.26 16.32 67 2.44 29.70 13.94 30.26 16.32 68 3.09 37.60 15.98 30.26 16.32 69 4.15 50.46 18.23 30.26 16.32 70 6.06 73.75 20.75 30.26 16.32 71 10.30 125.23 23.57 30.26 16.32 72 3.17 22.23 12.12 26.84 16.32 73 3.74 26.21 13.95 26.84 16.32 74 4.57 32.04 15.98 26.84 16.32 75 5.83 40.88 18.25 26.84 16.32 76 7.87 55.13 20.78 26.84 16.32 77 11.44 80.18 23.59 26.84 16.32 78 18.92 132.56 26.73 26.84 16.32 79 4.81 23.57 13.95 23.42 16.32 80 5.73 28.06 15.99 23.42 16.32 81 7.06 34.57 18.21 23.42 16.32 82 9.05 44.30 20.73 23.42 16.32 83 12.17 59.59 23.53 23.42 16.32 84 17.30 84.72 26.68 23.42 16.32 85 5.75 21.50 13.95 20.00 16.32 86 6.70 25.07 15.99 20.00 16.32 87 8.04 30.08 1B.22 20.00 16.32 88 9.94 37.21 20.74 20.00 16.32 89 12.73 47.63 23.55 20.00 16.32 90 16.98 63.54 26.69 20.00 16.32 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILS\01-12F-1\14.gni i 14-foot cut 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 i Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni Golds it Beta 0.00 (General Data] 14-foot cut Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe angle (deg) = 20.0 X-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 (LRFD and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.35 FS soil friction = 1.35 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 70 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes] X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 9 0 14 30 14 30 9 0 7 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Surch Loads] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 [Nails] X Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Fixed Horiz. C Coord Coord Length ation Strength Strength Nail? Spacing Me 0 12 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 0 8 1 15 50000 50000 0 8 0 4 1 15 50000 50000 0 8 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 pi Node 2 p2 Angle 1 .5 6 1 0 6 1 3 1 0 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 • Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 12.70 Nail Head Factor = 1.49 Nail Tendon Factor = 18825.22 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 12.70 27788.65 25 2 10.16 34307.51 29 3 6.42 26955.90 29 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 1 -89.48 67.10 0.91 85.00 1.40 2 -42.04 35.64 0.92 81.58 1.89 3 -43.36 36.76 0.96 81.58 1.96 4 -64.26 54.47 1.49 81.58 2.74 5 -33.47 31.99 1.43 78.16 3.27 6' -35.82 34.24 1.55 78.16 3.42 7 -52.81 50.48 2.16 78.16 4.07 8 -29.94 32.25 2.14 74.74 4.55 9 -44.89 48.35 2.87 74.74 5.52 10 -82.50 88.86 3.53 74.74 6.23 11 -26.39 32.07 2.85 71.32 6.23 12 -39.08 47.49 3.63 71.32 7.24 13 -75.74 92.04 4.41 71.32 8.68 14 -18.23 25.07 2.87 67.89 8.68 15 -23.97 32.95 3.65 67.89 9.01 16 -35.61 48.96 4.48 67.89 10.34 17 -71.93 98.89 5.35 67.89 11.03 18 -16.39 25.62 3.64 64.47 11.03 19 -21.58 33.73 4.46 64.47 11.58 20 -33.27 52.01 5.41 64.47 11.83 21 -70.38 110.01 6.37 64.47 11.83 22 -14.95 26.77 4.51 61.05 12.24 23 -20.16 36.09 5.43 61.05 12.24 24 -33.13 59.30 6.53 61.05 12.24 25 -10.90 22.59 4.52 57.63 12.59 26 -13.66 28.29 5.44 57.63 12.59 27 -18.92 39.19 6.49 57.63 12.59 28 -32.04 66.37 7.67 57.63 12.59 29 -9.75 23.72 5.47 54.21 12.70 30 -12.49 30.38 6.50 54.21 12.70 31 -17.87 43.47 7.67 54.21 12.70 32 732.52 79.12 9.00 54.21 12.70 33 -7.11 20.72 5.47 50.79 12.70 34 -8.66 25.27 6.50 50.79 12.70 35 -11.34 33.08 7.67 50.79 12.70 36 -16.87 49.19 8.99 50.79 12.70 37 -32.96 96.11 10.45 50.79 12.70 38 -6.08 21.93 6.54 47.37 12.70 39 -7.56 27.26 7.68 47.37 12.70 40 -10.18 36.69 9.00 47.37 12.70 41 -15.71 56.63 10.46 47.37 12.70 42 -34.93 125.91 12.16 47.37 12.70 43 -4.19 19.58 6.54 43.95 12.70 44 -5.02 23.45 7.69 43.95 12.70 45 -6.37 29.75 9.00 43.95 12.70 46 -8.80 41.11 10.47 43.95 12.70 47 -14.03 65.52 12.07 43.95 12.70 48 -31.70 148.06 13.84 43.95 12.70 49 -3.17 20.78 7.69 40.53 12.70 50 -3.86 25.33 9.01 40.53 12.70 51 -5.00 32.79 10.48 40.53 12.70 52 -7.07 46.44 12.11 40.53 12.70 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 53 -11.77 77.26 13.92 40.53 12.70 54 -26.35 172.94 15.80 40.53 12.70 55 -1.73 18.82 7.70 37.11 12.70 56 -2.04 22.26 9.02 37.11 12.70 57 -2.53 27.59 10.48 37.11 12.70 58 -3.34 36.40 12.12 37.11 12.70 59 -4.83 52.62 13.93 37.11 12.70 60 -8.44 92.04 16.04 37.11 12.70 61 -0.64 20.01 9.02 33.68 12.70 62 -0.76 24.03 10.49 33.68 12.70 63 -0.96 30.25 12.13 33.68 12.70 64 -1.29 40.51 13.95 33.68 12.70 65 -1.89 59.51 15.98 33.68 12.70 66 -3.21 101.09 18.17 33.68 12.70 67 0.51 18.28 9.02 30.26 12.70 68 0.60 21.43 10.49 30.26 12.70 69 0.73 26.08 12.09 30.26 12.70 70 0.93 33.27 13.91 30.26 12.70 71 1.26 45.04 15.94 30.26 12.70 72 1.86 66.53 18.26 30.26 12.70 73 3.06 109.56 20.59 30.26 12.70 74 1.71 19.45 10.50 26.84 12.70 75 2.03 23.07 12.10 26.84 12.70 76 2.50 28.41 13.93 26.84 12.70 77 3.20 36.44 15.93 26.84 12.70 78 4.37 49.72 18.21 26.84 12.70' 79 6.41 73.01 20.71 26.84 12.70 80 10.74 122.28 23.61 26.84 12.70 81 21.41 243.69 26.44 26.84 12.70 82 2.65 17.88 10.50 23.42 12.70 83 3.08 20.78 12.11 23.42 12.70 84 3.70 24.93 13.93 23.42 12.70 85 4.59 30.96 15.97 23.42 12.70 86 5.94 40.01 18.23 23.42 12.70 87 8.06 54.32 20.76 23.42 12.70 88 11.70 78.85 23.57 23.42 12.70 89 18.20 122.62 26.58 23.42 12:70 90 3.99 18.98 12.11 20.00 12.70 91 4.69 22.31 13.95 20.00 12.70 92 5.66 26.96 15.98 20.00 12.70 93 7.06 33.59 18.18 20.00 12.70 94 9.12 43.40 20.71 20.00 12.70 95 12.28 58.44 23.60 20.00 12.70 96 17.45 83.05 26.75 20.00 12.70 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 -5 14-foot cut intermediate construction 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILS\01-12F-1\14.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [General Data] 14-foot cut intermediate construction Unit weight of water = 62.4 Maximum toe angle (deg) = 85.0 Seismic coefficient = 0.0 Minimum toe. angle (deg) = 20.0 x-search limit (left) = 0.5 X-search limit (right) = 29.997 Number of toe angles = 20 Number of x-search exit points = 20 Toe coordinate = 0.0 Toe segment = 1 Toe flag = Y x-base = 0.0 y-base = 0.0 Number of sub -angle increments = 40.0 [LRFD and Safety Factor Data] Safety factor type = A FS soil cohesion = 1.2 FS soil.friction = 1.2 FS nail head strength = 0.67 FS nail strength = 0.55 FS nail adhesion = 0.5 LF unit weight of water = 1.0 LF unit weight of soil = 1.0 LF surcharge loads = 1.0 LF seismic loads = 1.0 RF soil cohesion = 1.0 RF soil friction = 1.0 RF nail head strength = 1.0 RF nail adhesion = 1.0 RF nail strength = 1.0 [Soils] c phi gamma pullout 50 34 125 3000 70 40 135 8000 [Piezos] X Coord Y Coord This. copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Nodes] X Coord Y Coord 0 0 0 9 0 14 30 14 30 9 0 7 [Segments] Node Node Soil Soil Pullout Pullout 1 2 Top Bottom Top Bottom 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 2 1 2 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 Input File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14.gni GoldSpir Beta 0.00 [Surch_Loads] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 3 250 4 250 270 [Nails] X Y Nail Declin- Tendon Head Fixed Horiz. C Coord Coord Length ation Strength Strength Nail? Spacing Me 0 12 1 15 50000 10000 0 8 0 8 1 15 50000 50000 0 8 [Earth Pressures] Node 1 pl Node 2 p2 Angle 1 .5 6 1 0 6 1 3 1 0 [Analysis Options] Design Mode Soil Nail Analysis This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 3 output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14 GoldSpir Beta 0.00 Nail Length Factor = 14.48 Nail Head Factor = 2.51 Nail Tendon Factor = 25301.07 Nail Nail Nail Surface Number Length Capacity No. 1 14.49 40705.19 23 2 10.74 46020.55 31 Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center Ilcept angle Factor 1 -82.06 68.76 0.93 85.00 1.40 2 -38.73 36.61 0.94 81.58 2.54 3 -40.02 37.83 1.01 81.58 2.76 4 -59.61 56.34 1.51 81.58 3.82 5 -30.73 32.73 1.45 78.16 4.78 6 -32.56 34.68 1.58 78.16 5.06 7 -47.40 50.48 2.15 78.16 5.84 8 -27.70 33.28 2.22 74.74 6.95 9 -40.16 48.25 2.87 74.74 7.53 10 -23.77 32.30 2.88 71.32 9.04 11 -34.78 47.26 3.62 71.32 9.85 12 -65.67 89.22 4.40 71.32 10.46 13 -16.41 25.34 2.68 67.89 11.83 14 -21.41 33.05 3.68 67.89 12.05 15 -31.53 48.68 4.47 67.89 12.05 16 -61.77 95.37 5.34 67.89 12.05 17 -14.61 25.81 3.65 64.47 13.00 18 -19.08 33.71 4.49 64.47 13.00 19 -29.05 51.33 5.41 64.47 13.00 20 -13.11 26.78 4.51 61.05 13.68 21 -17.57 35.88 5.46 61.05 13.68 22 -28.47 58.13 6.52 61.05 13.68 23 -9.43 22.58 4.52 57.63 14.36 24 -11.77 28.18 5.47 57.63 14.36 25 -16.20 38.79 6.49 57.63 14.36 26 -27.14 64.97 7.66 57.63 14.36 27 -8.26 23.65 5.47 54.21 14.36 28 -10.52 30.14 6.53 54.21 14.36 29 -14.95 42.83 7.67 54.21 14.36 30 -26.72 76.54 8.98 54.21 14.36 31 -5.86 20.67 5.47 50.79 14.48 32 -7.11 25.09 6.53 50.79 14.48 33 -9.29 32.76 7.68 50.79 14.48 34 -13.67 48.23 8.99 50.79 14.48 35 -26.31 92.80 10.45 50.79 14.48 36 -4.79 21.79 6.53 47.37 14.48 37 -5.93 26.94 7.71 47.37 14.48 38 -7.94 36.09 9.00 47.37 14.48 39 -12.15 55.25 10.46 47.37 14.48 40 -26.25 119.32 12.14 47.37 14.48 41 -3.08 19.47 .6.54 43.95 14.48 42 -3.67 23.22 7.72 43.95 14.48 43 -4.63 29.31 9.00 43.95 14.48 44 -6.36 40.26 10.47 43.95 14.48 45 -10.03 63.47 12.07 43.95 14.48 46 -22.03 139.34 13.82 43.95 14.48 47 -2.01 20.59 7.72 40.53 14.48 48 -2.43 25.00 9.01 40.53 14.48 49 -3.12 32.06 10.45 40.53 14.48 50 -4.41 45.27 12.10 40.53 14.48 51 -7.27 74.60 13.92 40.53 14.48 52 -15.75 161.68 15.78 40.53 14.48 53 -0.82 21.95 9.00 37.11 14.48 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 1 Output File: C:\JOBFILE\01-12F-1\14 GoldSpir Beta 0.00. Surface x y Surface toe Length Number Center Center I'cept angle Factor 54 -1.01 27.10 10.48 37.11 14.48 55 -1.33 35.56 12.12 37.11 14.48 56 -1.91 51.08 13.93 37.11 14.48 57 -3.29 88.02 16.02 37.11 14.48 58 0.44 19.76 9.05 33.68 14.48 59 0.53 23.62 10.49 33.68 14.48 60 0.66 29.52 12.11 33.68 14.48 61 0.88 39.30 13.93 33.68 14.48 62 1.28 57.53 15.98 33.68 14.48 63 2.15 96.36 18.15 33.68 14.48 64 1.73 21.08 10.49 30.26 -14.48 65 2.10 25.54 12.13 30.26 14.48 66 2.66 32.41 13.96 30.26 .14.48 67 3.59 43.67 15.99 30.26 14.48 68 5.27 64.07 18.26 30.26 14.48 69 8.94 108.71 20.76 30.26 14.48 70 2.73 19.14 10.50 26.84 14.48 71 3.23 22.60 12.14 26.84 14.48 72 3.95 27.70 13.92 26.84 14.48 73 5.07 35.52 15.96 26.84 14.48 74 6.85 48.01 18.21 26.84 14.48 75 10.00 70.07 20.79 26.84 14.48 76 16.60 116.30 23.61 26.84 14.48 77 32.11 225.03 26.40 26.84 14.48 78 4.16 20.37 12.14 23.42 14.48 79 4.97 24.32 13.93 23.42 14.48 80 6.14 30.07 15.96 23.42 14.48 81 7.90 38.70 18.23 23.42 14.48 82 10.68 52.28 20.75 23.42 14.48 83 15.39 75.38 23.56 23.42 14.48 84 24.44 119.67 26.77 23.42 14.48 85 4.98 18.62 .12.14 20.00 14.48 86 5.82 21.77 13.94 20.00 14.48 87 7.00 26.20 15.97 20.00 14.48 88 8.70 32.54 18.24 20.00 14.48 89 11.17 41.79 20.76 20.00 14.48 90 14.98 56.07 23.60 20.00 14.48 91 21.17 79.20 26.74 20.00 14.48 This copy of GoldSpiral licensed to: R. John Byrne; GROUND SUPPORT PLLC Page 2 SOIL NAIL WALL FACING DESIGN CALCULATIONS Ground Support PLLC TABLE 131 Soil Nail Shotcrete Facing Flexural Strength Soil Nail Wall Facing Analysis Version 2.00 - 01/13/98 Geometry & Miscellaneous Input Data Vertical Nail Spacing, Sv (ft) 6 60, Horizontal Nail Spacing, SH (ft) Facing Thickness, tF (in) 4:00 Facing Usuage (Temporary, Permanent) Temporary Nail Pattern (Rectangular, Staggered) Staggered Resistance Factor for Facing Flexure, �F 1.00 Vertical Bearing Bar Continuity Factor (0 = Cutoff, l=Continuous) 0 00' Continuity Factor For All Positive Moment Steel 0 = Cutoff,1 = Continuous) 100 Steel Depth, d (in) 2:00 Area of a Main Vertical Bar/ Wire, AMvi (in) Main Vertical Bar/Wire Spacing, sMv (in) 40 Area of Vertical Bearing Bar Reinforcement, AvB (in) 0 40 Area of a Main Horizontal Bar/ Wire, AMHl (in2) f 0 029� Main Horizontal Bar/Wire Spacing, SMH (in) 4 0, Area of Waler Bar Reinforcement, APB(in) '0:40 Material Properties Concrete Compressive Strength, f'c (ksi) 40 Main Reinforcement Yield Stress, Fy (ksi) Waler/ Vertical Bearing Bar Reinforcement Yield Stress, Fy (ksi) 60:0. Facing Flexure Nailhead Capacity Calculations Facing Flexure Factor, CF 2.00 Gross Reinforcement Ratio, Negative Moment, Vertical Direction, pNv 0.29% Gross Reinforcement Ratio, Positive Moment, Vertical Direction, ppv 0.18% Gross Reinforcement Ratio, Negative Moment, Horizontal Direction, pNH 0.32% Gross Reinforcement Ratio, Positive Moment, Horizontal Direction, PPH 0.32% Negative Unit Moment Capacity in Vertical Direction, m v (k-ft/ft) 1.301 Positive Unit Moment Capacity in Vertical Direction, m+v (k-ft/ft) 0.842 Negative Unit Moment Capacity in Horizontal Direction, m H (k-ft/ft) 1.450 Positive Unit Moment Capacity in Horizontal Direction, m+H (k-ft/ft) 1.450 Nominal Nail Head Strength in Vertical Direction, TFN,v (k) 45.7 Nominal Nail Head Strength in Horizontal Direction, TFN,H (k) 38.7 Design Nail Head Strength, �TFN (k) 38.7 TABLE B2 Soil Nail Shotcrete Facing Punching Shear Strength Soil Nail Wall Facing Analysis & Design Version 1.10 - 08/05/96 Geometric and Material Parameters Vertical Nail Spacing, Sv (ft) y ':':`` , ` k6:00 Horizontal Nail Spacing, SH (ft) Facing Thickness, tF (in) Connection Type (Bearing, Headed Stud)' ` . Beaune Facing Usuage (Temporary, Permanent) -nTemporary Resistance Factor for Facing Punching Shear, �s Plate Width, bPL (in)" } ° '00 Plate Thickness, tPL (in) 0.75 Permanent Cover to Plate on Soil Side, CPL (in).�.0:00 Headed Stud Embedment Length, LHs (in) 0:00, Headed Stud Spacing, SHS (in) Grout Column Diameter, Dcc (in) 2, } ;<" 0:00 Concrete Compressive Strength, f'c (ksi)40 Calculations Nail Head Pressure Increase Factor for Punching Shear, Cs 2.40 Equivalent Cone Depth, he (in) 4.00 Equivalent Top Cone Diameter, D"c (in) 8.00 Cone Bottom Diameter, Dc (in) 16.00 Effective Cone Diameter, D'c (in) 12.00 Cone Bottom Area, Ac (in) 201.1 Grout Column Area, Acc(in) 0.0 Shear Stress Area, Av (in) 150.8 Nominal Punching Shear Stress, vN (psi) 253.0 Nominal Punching Shear Strength of Facing, VN (k) 38.1 Strength Ratio From Pressure Concentration, TFN/VN 1.08 Design Nail Head Strength, �STFN (k) 41.0 APPENDIX C SOLDIER PILE CANTILEVER WALL DESIGN CALCULATIONS Ground Support PLLC DISCRETE WALL TOE EMBEDMENT MODEL Note: based on force and moment equilibrium Note: includes water table Depth of Embedment (L) 35.80 " 16.80 ; Shear Force at Top(F) 0 Z' Value (L) 3.745 Bending Mom at Top(FL) 0 Note: Z value is distance above bottom Pile Width (L) 3 of pile that transition from passive to Depth is measured from top of wall Pile Spacing (L) 8 active and vice versa, begins. Height of Wall (L) 19 Resisting Side Act EFD 30 Driving Side Pass EFD 400 p-start pass efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Passive(FIUL) Active(F/UL) p-start active efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Active(F/UL) Passive(F/UL) 0 0 0 21 0 0 6Q 30.0 0 50 60 0 Note: Pass 800 0 400 0 21.01 50 0 0 0 800 60 60 1560 a 60 20000 pressures ; 0 include an 0 0 0 0 12396 930 60 0 factor of sa p 0 0 0 0 —`a 60 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 r 60 0 0 0 0 0 E 60 ..._. 60 0 0 Q(u) �4 8720 34 Basal Shear Force (F) 0 Cntrl "s" sets depth to give tip moment and .. � " 0 shear equal to 00 Moment at location where p(net)� 469506 Cntri a sets Strut 1 to give moment 0 at p(net) 0 le ri►ina ettt"41 tCt zero�` 12'43timtl �r�: 705809 Note: Solution for force balance only can Maximum Shear Force 147020 be obtained by setting Z' Value to 0.001 TABLE C1 CANTILEVER SOLDIER PILE 19-FOOT WALL -n G) C ;u m 45000 - 35000 - 3000-0- 25000 - 20000 - 0 15000 10000 - 5000 M C371 UO Resisting Force -J� �kL lz IZ .3t., e x 7�' 14 10 Depth Cl FIGURE C1.2 Shear Force (F) N) 0 CD, 0 0 CD O O CD 0 CD CD 0 C) CD Cb C) C) C) O I I, Ch tc mn v o vv a i�t 44. IT O O -. 7•.., t �, t � t t =,F: h slam wNwml=�=wwM==w Nam wmffimm�o� go= ffiz�� ®Sow Emmet= S�Him OWN mqmm� Manama= �Wffium mmmmw= �W�Www= � zjzonmzsml� FIGURE ClA DIS RETE WALL TOE EMBEDMENT MODEL Note: based on force and moment equilibrium Note: includes water table Depth of Embedment (L) 32.32 15.32 Shear Force at Top(F) 0 Z' Value (L) 3.429 Bending Mom at Top(FL) 0 Note: Z value is distance above bottom Pile Width (L) 2.5 of pile that transition from passive to Depth is measured from top of wall Pile Spacing (L) 8 active and vice versa, begins. Height of Wall (L) 17 Resisting Side Act EFD 30 Driving Side Pass EFD 400 p-start pass efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Passive(FIUL) Active(F/UL) p-start active efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Active(F/UL) Passive(F/UL) 0 0 0 1g 0 0 60 30 0 0 50 t} 60 0 Note: Pass 800 400 19.01 0 60 1560 20000 pressures 0 0 0 0 (�'F 800 60 Fti 60 0 include an 0 ` 0 0 0 _ ' 13196 990 60 0 factor of sa 0 0 0 0 0 0 a� 60 0 k 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 w � 60 0 Basal Shear Force (F) 0 Cntrl "s" sets depth to give tip moment and ' 0 shear equal to 0 B``�`ni�'ng �gotr��l�'�;;� q Moment at location where p(net)=0 355606 Cntrl a sets Strut 1 to give moment = 0 at p(net) = 0 Cnt l �007 eWjWth`i gIV,6 tlpi ni ritetit e4di ftci zero °~ Note: Solution for force balance only can J1Ririirrtl ieltdt�rlt ._. 527453 Y Maximum Shear Force 121060 be obtained by setting Z' Value to 0.001 TABLE C2 CANTILEVER SOLDIER PILE 17-FOOT WALL Force/Length 0 0 0 110 00 C) CDN) 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 CD 0 0 CD CD 0 CDCD CD 0 CD as� Ol O ml !;R -54", W4, I , "i , - , !. ".": *1 lil 1: It. �"t. 4TA Ul 0 mn (D =r ik,;4. -4 C:) ofk . I I . -n G) C X m 0 Force/Length -.L -..% N) N) w CO Cn Cn CD Cn CD Cn CD Cn C) O CD 0 0 0 CD CD 0 CD 0 CD CD 0 0 0 C) 0 CD CD CD 0 C) CD C) CD C) CD 4, 'VA ■ O O O 'e -7 N P VT IRA, V.; 'p lk z". _4 fm#L 2r JWY, ,L_f (D on div A .4 % "x. ;jj Rig l vk X VIZ. 7z zwz 0 Bending Moment. 600000 7� .77 7 777 500000 'T 77-f J `� , r �y* , a. +` - � J. � a + w-,,.� a �•. , $ FIGURE C2.4 DISCRETE WALL TOE EMBEDMENT MODEL Note: based on force and moment equilibrium Note: includes water table Depth of Embedment (L) 27.06 13.06 Shear Force at Top(F) 0 Z' Value (L) 2.948 Bending Mom at Top(FL) 0 Note: Z value is distance above bottom Pile Width (L) 2.5 of pile that transition from passive to Depth is measured from top of wall Pile Spacing (L) 8 active and vice versa, begins. Height of Wall (L) 14 Resisting Side Act EFD 30 Driving Side Pass EFD 400 p-start pass efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Passive(F/L/L) Active(F/UL) p-start active efd z top z bottom Depth(L) Active(F/UL) Passive(F/UL) 0, 0 0 16 �0,4 0 0 60 30.0 - 0 50 60 0 Note: Pass ,800 400 16.01 50, �u 0 60 1560 20000 pressures 0 . 0 0 0r(3) 800 60 60 0 include an 0 0 0 , 0 € 5U^ 14396 1080 60 0 factor of sa 0 0 , 0� 0 0 0z 60 0 0 0 60 0 0 0`q 60 0 0 0 60 0 .,. 0 0 y `"_.., 60 0 6720 N( 34 Basal Shear Force (F) 0 Cntrl "s" sets depth to give tip moment and . phl . 34: 3 gdl 0- 0 shear equal to 0 g} f'Mks 1.5 Moment at location where p(net) 0 219245 Cntrl a sets Strut 1 to give moment 0 at p(net) 0 9g� 't20 „ Cnz. s�Bt�',tiep�h #Cs'nre flip"iuimgs�t;8qua1 taltim ., � pst t 1,214 ;MW&U R _: WWI ,4"', nt . „ 319253 Note: Solution for force balance only can Maximum Shear Force 86530 be obtained by setting Z' Value to 0.001 TABLE C3 CANTILEVER SOLDIER PILE 14-FOOT WALL Force/Length W � Cn M --4 W CD C) C0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a CD 0 C) CD 0 C) C) 0 CD C) 0 CD C) 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD C) 41" Ln O O Paz14 i� P �YM IT fS , ri I X. VIA wn CD Cn Ale t,yta p N iw� Force/Length (n Cn CD Cn C) 01 0 Cn OOOOOOOO CDC:) 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 CD WK WAS. vgm lox =%ph. M? tot C Py . D -T 3, AN ... =01, Tv R:,-�: I-0 Q., yK, A— A can f AND, Way CD A IMAM 4"" wg top "Ut loop n :. NO OKA 2Q All ......... W1 'Imams PNOIL -quo Zc� , 41 mnOQ fmqL 07 11- 77 7 A A WWI VMS; MEN I R, isix MI%:: Upton., W11— 0 U, look i'�� 2, a, A. AGA 001 SOME Q 4 14C 1'.i r W NUA 06" 11 WIN - two T MAY IM QUM- J Wynn Nf*`4 L A� i Wei ME pin V40'. 9 Q NAM, on Won 2. C) C) I I To, Si 1 Fit fi ti MOEN 'EIIIN111111011 ®gee®®��®®®��r®®��®��®�� sip • so - - - - — — 40 40 AD 40 - - ow It cri LU U— , .70 APPENDIX D SOLDIER PILE CANTILEVER WALL FACING DESIGN CALCULATIONS Ground Support PLLC Ground Support K. SUBJECT L T/ n/ PROJECT NO. MADE BY /1 �G SHEET 1 OF •Z REVIEW BY DATE Q n�yr�r Sl e.......l. ... ......<.................. .. .. .. . .i�a:......�R.. ... ��%tL�!......1�..I-q- . shun/s ..... ........:.... . _ '......" ' ...... :....... ..... ........ ( _ ....................:................................... • f. ........... . : - {.f y .. ................ ....... :.............. ......<...... . ' . .............. .. . ............................. ..................... . .............. : .. ...................................................... . // I• y .. ... - '-' ...............L.. • '. - ..................... ...... ....... .... ..•.... ... .'. .. . ..:....:..........<...... .. .. ....... r..lsrr�e ... . ..............:... . Ll . ............... ....:...._<................................i...... 's _._.... _ .._._ . _. _. ........................... f..................... ............ ....,............ . z 2r : redK.4r�r�u c E : } hp 4to .... S' ........ _ n Ground Support P. SUBJECT PROJECT NO. MADE BY� ' SHEET Z, OF Z REVIEW BY DATE t„?u �..........u................ .......... ,.......e...... Q _.... ............. ..Z... DJ . jjll .... ✓V.�C'... �Ly.�P ,Q tt r - / _. .....fir.. ..,aeep, ......!.............<....................:...... . ..:.. ............. ��. .{�.: - i n�..., .....r_.... ... _act.,... ; .....;..... ............... _ .......:. ...... _ _...... .. e� v: -1 .......................................... . ..'.....:.... .... ............... ......... ..........................., ............... .. ........ , .................., ..... . ........................�.....:.....r, �.... c.l......��.....�............ .:....h y ......�� s.....:...:� .....'...... �./ ...... Q� �.................. ............................. •.............. ................................:...... ...... z .. � .. .QCtn •... ..................._.._...... .. t.....Q l(...........e..... I.t7....2...A • ENGINEERS -NORTHWEST, INC.P.S. 6869 WOODLAWN AVE.N.E. (SUITE 205) SEATTLE, WA. 98115 SINGLE STORY BASEMENT RETAINING WALL Job number: - �94000MOu Project: - Edmonds)gffi_ce'Buili 66 AM "Mift RToP = 1.419 klf Active EFP (pcf) _ 45. Uniform horiz.pressure (psf) 8' Soil density (pcf) Surcharge (psf) PLL (Plo PDL (PIO = 884 F'c (ksi) Fy (ksi) _ . , _: 60 :': Vertical reinf. size (#) = 7 -. Wall thickness (in.) = 10 Horizontal reinf. size (#) = 5 H (ft.) hl (ft.) A 3�p1/ot f H =19.68 ft. RBOT. = 2.122 klf SHEETF_4 r-OF PLL = 703 plf PDL = 884 plf h2=f Oft. h1 =1 9.68 ft. 0.045 11 Surcharge 0.09 ksf --J Uniform horiz.pressure 0.058 ksf —J OUTPUT Active EFP 0.436 ksf V =0 @ 5.31 ft. from top of wall M max. = 4.33 k-ft./ft. Mu max. = 7.35 k-ft./ft. Reinforcing Use # 7 @ 18 in. o/c vertical at d = 7.5 in. Use # 5 @ 15 in. o/c horizontal Wall shear is O.K. 25.3% vu = 0.028 ksi vc = 0.11 ksi Axial loads are not included in the wall design yet!!! Zo- 51 cc -"Ws 01f- RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 1e&1_!eZ6 1 STORY L9/20901 Page 1 00094BSM F4o(fo Iz ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Title : Edmonds Office Building 000 Seattle, Washington Dsgnr. TDM Date: 3:10PM, 19 MAR 0 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade in el. Voice: (206) 525-7569 Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Fax. 206 522-6698 ( ) Scope: Foundations {� " - 510001 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Page 2 Description Wall above first floor - design reinforcing only! Desi n Summary Total Bearing Load = 1,765 Ibs Summary of Stem Section Designs.... resultant ecc. = 35.34 in Top: 6 in Conc, #5@12.00 in@Edge, From 6.5 ft to 3.0 ft Resultant Exceeds Fig. Widthl Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 <= 3,000 psf 2nd: 6 in Conc, #5@ 5.00 in@Edge, From 3.0 ft to 0.0 ft Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 <= 3,000 psf ACI Factored Press @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored Press @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 0.6 <= 76.0 psi Footing Shear @ Heel = 17.3 <= 76.0 psi WALL STABILITY RATIOS Overturning Stability Ratio = is, ilSTABLE! Slidi = 0.30 UNSTABLE! Stem Design & Construction Top Stem 2nd Stem Design location for stem is at Stem OK Stem OK this height above footing = 3.00 ft 0.00 ft Wall Material Above "Ht" = Concrete Concrete Thickness = 6.00 in 6.00 in p �• fS �M = _ 44 -+ • 3< < - 7S N ' Rebar Size = # 5 # 5 Rebar Spacing = 12.00 in 5.00 in Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge Design Data fb/FB + fa/Fa Total Force @ Section Moment.... Actual Moment..... Allowable Axial Stress.... Actual Axial Stress..... Allowable Shear..... Actual Shear..... Allowable Bar Embed ABOVE Ht. Bar Embed BELOW Ht. Wall Weight Rebar Depth 'd' Masonry Data fm Fs Solid Grouting Special Inspection Modular Ratio'n' Short Term Factor Equiv. Solid Thick. Concrete Data fc Fy = 0.306 0.613 = 1,102.0lbs 2,596.3lbs = 1,655.1 ft-# 7,087.8 ft-# = 5,416.3 ft-# 11,570.4 ft-# = 21.93 psi 51.67 psi = 93.11 psi 93.11 psi = 12.00 in 12.00 in = 12.00 in 6.58 in = 75.0 psf 75.0 psf = 4.19 in 4.19 in = 3,000 psi 3,000 psi RECEIVE 60,000 psi 60,000 psi MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS F'No 514 ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206)522-6698 Title : Edmonds Office Building 00 Dsgnr: TDM Date: 3:10PM Avel. AR 0 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope: Foundations Swr Slow) Cantilevered Retaining Wall Description Wall above first floor - design reinforcing onlyl General Retained Height = 6.00 ft Wall height above retained soil = 0.50 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00 : 1 Height of Soil over Toe 0.00 in Soil Density = 125.00 pct Footing Data Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.67 ft Total Footing Width = 2.67 ft Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Footing Key Data Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Width = 0.00 in Depth = 0.00 in Surcharges Surcharge Over Heel = 250.0 psf Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 psf Added Lateral L a on Stem ..Height to Top ..Height to Bottom Lateral Load on Stem above retained soil Design Results Pc Fy Minimum As % Rebar Cover @ Top Rebar Cover @ Bottom ACI Factored Soil Pressure Mu': From Upward Loads Mu': From Downward Load Mu: Used For Desi Actual One- hear AllowabTe One -Way Shear = 9t3.0 il' 6.00 ft 0.00 ft 78.5 psf 2,000 psi = 40,000 psi = 0.0018 2.00 in = 3.00 in Page 1 Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 3,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Active Soil Pressure - Heel Side = 30.0 psf Active Soil Pressure - Toe Side = 30.0 pcf Passive Pressure = 0.0 pcf Water table height over heel = 0.0 ft Sliding Data Friction Factor @ Footing & Soil = 0.300 ...neglect ht. for passive = -,9'6in Lateral Sliding Force - 1,767.3lbs less Passive Pressure F = - 0.0 lbs less Friction For = - 529.6 lbs Added Res t Force Required = 1,237.6lbs [-Axial Load Applied To Stem Axial Dead Load = 0.0 lbs Axial Live Load = 0.0 lbs Axial Load Eccentricity = 0.0 in >oting Data Adjacent Footing Load = 0.0 lbs Footing Width = 0.00 ft Eccentricity = 0.00 in Wall to Ftg CL Dist = 0.00 ft Footing Type = Line Load Base Above/Below Soil at Back of Wall = 0.0 ft Toe = 0 psf = 0 0 ft-# = 105 1,102 ft-# = 105 1.102 ft-# = 0.60 17.29 psi = 76.03 76.03 psi Minifir n ooting Rebar Options...... Toe Side...... Heel Side.... Not req'dt-reQd ,Mu <S*Fr Mu<S*FFrr Key Reinforcement: Not Req'd = Mu<S*Fr RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. 6869 WOODLAWN AVE. N.E. (SUITE 205) SEATTLE, WA. 98115 SHEETF90 Rev. 2/19/97 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL _ Tg/5 16 it (C-^ noe rl-1e Y PROJECT:- E, M6hds'.OfBceBuildimg;, Input= •'; d ;5a;. (per lineal ft ) Equiv. active pressure' 30; F.S. Ove - Equiv. passive pressure F.S. Sliding = 1.50 " Uniform horiz. pressure °8F= :_ '; Pv r`F= . Soli dens r`F= F _ Surcharge Fy Vert Reinf. size (If) _M'S. 0 4TEMW" _ tt6. H FT= @ T.O.S. dao.F. dT.o F _ ' us".' TStl1= Horiz. Reinf. size (6) _ "---4 ram; . Allowable soil bearing KSF= IOkj3.r ^ = HFrt ...-.._;,-; 7' Kr +Z' FdaC Coefficient of friction = OA Ph r`F= TOOFTL- 1 HzFt- Shear key width '"= - 0 -' 270 Shear key height '"= ��-: 0 El 0'-0" @ El 0'-0" Restrained ? (Y or N) :... Y :- Slabresistance=1.506 Bury'"= `~ lure _ Passive - 0 Tf'"'= :.11.25 . W,FT _ Width" = :,;:. 3.5.; ; 301 :ps @ B.O.F. Friction = 0 qs min. = 0.000 ksf qs max. = 2.229 1.556 ksf L brg. = 3.31 ft. 1.108 ksf Stem From top (@ 1110 th Pts.) Mu K- T vu Ks' P Vertical reinforcing AsW2 bar size Spacing Horizontal reinforcing As" 2 bar size S cing Remarks 0.900 0.006 0.000 0.0000 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 1.800 0.050 0.001 0.0000 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 2.700 0.167 0.003 0.0001 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 3.600 0.397 0.005 0.0003 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 4.500 0.775 0.008 0.0005 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 5.400 1.338 0.012 0.0009 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 6.300 2.125 0.017 0.0015 0.12 5 18 0.19 4 12 7.200 3.173 0.022 0.0022 0.16 5 18 0.19 4 12 8.100 4.517 0.027 0.0032 0.23 5 16 0.19 4 12 9.000 6.197 0.034 0.0033 0.24 5 16 0.19 4 12 Ftg.Toe Bottom reinforcing @ Stem Mu KFT vu KSI As°" Z bar size Spacing 1.585 0.016 0.0007 0.06 5 59 Ftg.Heel Top reinforcing @ Stem Mu l vu KS1 Asou bar size Spacing 2.796 0.021 0.0009 0.10 5 38 RECEIVED Shear key reinf.3" dr. d= Mu K.FT 0.000 vu KSi Vertical reinforcing AsW2 bar size S cin to toe face 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0 0 nu i e :aueviravie vu ---- = u.77u mou-,11 PIMI\ L d LUUI DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Page 1 1/22/2001 00094Retwall.xis ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. SHEET F1 QtMF 6869 WOODLAWN AVE. N.E. (SUITE 205) Rev. 2/19/97 SEATTLE, WA. 98115 i CONCRETE RETAINING WALL - 'K�r"lP _ (�pus� � 6cn�,40ttjc),4 S-A ¢s CTu►' PROJECT: - Edrrionds,, fi" Odlldl i ' «- L Input = . r - :-;ywtx; s. (per lineal ft.) j� �� (,v ApEquiv. active pressure_ ;p ? Fe rnmg = Equiv. passive pressure PcF_ NGIII �. g=.. Uniform horiz. pressure °3"= Now Pv MF_ �-tD LT'1u.( Soil density_ ^125; Surcharge °w F'c "°'=+r 3 a Fy � PQ SO4 Vert Reinf. size (#) = 7a;r� dsTEmm* = TM deo.F.'N'= tU7Z10 dT.o.F.DL - ' `8.7& Horiz. Reinf. size Allowable soil bearing "F= 777 Coefficient of friction = 0.4< Too FT.= , vll Shear key width '"'= 0 Shear key height '*= 0 Restrained ? ( Y or N) N Slab resistance "" = 0.000 - Passive"' = 0.164 -, WAFT.=r. .0 '..1. Friction = 1.297 kips -' qs max. = 2.170 ksfLL 1.444 ksf 1.081 ksf HAFT= 3 ` HFT= !0, Ph -- €70>�: El 0'-0" Bury= 777 Width"' = 3.5 •` - qs min. = 0.000 ksf L brg. = 2.99 ft. 0 @ T.O.S. 4 { ('-UW QU (CXr RCJ5-w4 240 @ El 0'-0" 268 @ B.O.F. Stem From top (@ 1110 th Pts.) Mu K47 vu KrA Vertical reinforcing As1N2 bar size Spacing Horizontal reinforcing As1N2 bar size Spacing Remarks 0.800 0.004 0.001 0.0000 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 1.600 0.035 0.002 0.0001 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 2.400 0.118 0.005 0.0003 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 3.200 0.279 0.009 0.0008 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 4.000 0.544 0.013 0.0015 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 4.800 0.940 0.019 0.0026 0.11 6 18 0.14 4 16 5.600 1.493 0.026 0.0033 0.12 6 18 0.14 4 16 6.400 2.228 0.034 0.0049 0.18 6 18 0.14 4 16 7.200 3.173 0.043 0.0071 0.26 6 18 0.14 4 16 8.0001 4.352 0.053 0.0102 0.37 6 14 0.14 4 16 Ftg.Toe Bottom reinforcing @ Stem Mu KiT vu K51 As1N2 bar size Spacing 1.519 0.016 0.0007 0.06 6 87 Ftg.Heel Top reinforcing @ Stem Mu K-FT vu KSI As1N2 bar size Spacing 3.200 0.024 75.0010 0.11 6 48 RECEIVED Shear key reinf.3" cir. d = Mu K+T 0.000 vu KS' Vertical reinforcing As1N2 bar size Spacing MAR 2 3 2001 to too face 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0 0 riv i r :aliowaDie vu "" = umo mimii tiw �wrinuv� Q�nvl .L;0 vm. CITY OF EDMONDS Page 1 1 /30/2001 00094Retwal12.xls ENGINEERS -NORTHWEST, INC.P.S. SHEET_E! I F 6869 WOODLAWN AVE.N.E. (SUITE 205) SEATTLE, WA. 98115 ( SINGLE STORY BASEMENT RETAINING WALL Job number: - 4000000 PILL = 0 plf Project: - Ed br ds'Office`Buildir6 PDT = 0 plf RToP = 0.83 klf INPUT h2 = 0 ft. Active EFP (pcf) = 5 Uniform horiz.pressure (psf) = Soil density (Po _ _ 25 .�a 3/�'► Ill Surcharge (psf) = 50�: Pu (Plo =22MO; PDT (PIO = 'I'M H = 7 ft. h1 = 7 ft. F'c (ksi) = 1-F;.3�, Fy (ksi) _ : ;:= 60 '; 0.045 Vertical reinf. size (#) = 6 1 Wall thickness (in.) = 6 Horizontal reinf. size (#) = 5 H (ft.) = 7. RSOT. = 1.197 klf hl (ft.) = 7 Surcharge 0.09 ksf Uniform horiz.pressure 0.042 ksf OUTPUT Active EFP 0.315 ksf V =0 @ 3.81 ft. from top of wall M max. = 1.79 k-ft./ft. Mu max. = 3.04 k-ft./ft. Reinforcing Use # 6 @ 18 in. o/c vertical at d = 3 in. Use # 5 @ 18 in. olc horizontal Wall shear is O.K. 35.7% vu = 0.039 ksi vc = 0.11 ksi Axial loads are not included in the wall design yet M RECEIVE® MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT CTR. CITY OF D ONDS 1 STORY 3/19/2001 Page 1 00094Ra F14DIZ ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206) 522-6698 _ Z scoot Description Tank lid Tide : Edmonds Office Building Job # 00094000 Dsgnr: TDM Date: 3:1 OPM, 19 MAR 01 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade parking level. Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope: Foundations Multi -Span Concrete Beam Page 1 General Information Fy 60,000.0 psi All Spans Considered as Individual Beams ACI Dead Load Factor 1.40 rc 3,000.0 psi Stirrup Fy 60,000.0 psi ACI Live Load Factor 1.70 Concrete Member Information uescnption w b-sk Span ft 10.00 10.00 Beam Width in 12.00 12.00 Beam Depth in 8.00 8.00 End Fixity Pe4'n ph -Pm Reinf: Center A9041 0•44W 0•44ia Bar DWh s.OUin GOoin Left Area Right Bar Depth Amal Loads Dead Load k/ft' 0.297 0.297 Live Load k/ft 0.250 Point #1 DL k LL kI 2.000 @ X ft 0.000 5.000 Results Beam OK Beam OK I Mmax @ Cntr k-ft 10.51 5.20 @ X = ft 5.00 5.00 Mn ' Phi k-ft 10.98 10.98 Max @ Left End k-ft I 0.00 0.00 Mn ' Phi k-ft 0.00 0.00 Max @ Right End k-ft 0.00 0.00 Mn ' Phi k-ft 0.00 0.00 Bending OK Bending OK Shear @ Left k 4.20 2.08 Shear @ Right k 4.20 2.08 Reactions & Deflections i LL @ Left k 1.25 0.00 Total @ Left k 2.73 1.48 DL @ Right k 1.48 1.48 LL @ Right k 1.25 0.00 Total @ Right k 2.73 1.48 Max. Deflection in -0.192 -0.042 @ X = ft 5.00 5.00 Inertia: Effective in4 204.91 512.00 Shear Stirrups Stirrup Rebar Area in2 0.220 0.220 Spacing @ Left in 3.00 Not Req'd Spacing @ .2'L in Not Req'd Not Req'd Spacing @ .4'L in Not Req'd Not Req'd RECEIVED Spacing @ .6'L in Not Req'd Not Req'd Spacing @ .8'L in Not Req'd Not Req'd MAR 2 3 2001 Spacing @ Right in 3.00 Not Req'd DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206) 522-6698 Description Tank lid Query Values Location ft 0.00 Moment k-ft 0.0 Shear k 4.2 Deflection in 0.0000 Fnl0f3 Title : Edmonds Office Building Job # 00094000 Dsgnr. TDM Date: 3:10PM, 19 MAR 01 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade parking level. Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope: Foundations Multi -Span Concrete Beam 0.0 2.1 0.0000 Page 2 RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT OF CTR. EDMONDS CITY Fko Id - ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206) 522-6698 Title: Edmonds Office Building Job # 00094000 Dsgnr: TOM Date: 3:10PM, 19 MAR 01 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade parking level. Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope : Foundations Cantilevered Retaining Wall Description tank - water only, no lid General Retained Height = 6.25 ft Wall height above retained soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00 : 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Soil Density 125.00 pcf Footing Data Toe Width = 0.00 ft Heel Width = 5.00 ft Total Footing Width = 5.00 ft Footing Thickness = 16.00 in Page 1 Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 3,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Active Soil Pressure - Heel Side = 62.4 psf Active Soil Pressure - Toe Side = 0.0 pcf Passive Pressure = 350.0 pcf Water table height over heel = 0.0 ft Sliding Data Friction Factor @ Footing & Soil = 0.300 ...neglect ht. for passive = 0.00 in Lateral Sliding Force = 1,794.2lbs less Passive Pressure Force = - 311.1 Ibs Footing Key Data iless Friction Force = - 1,510.9lbs Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Added Restraint Force Required = 0.0 Ibs Width = 0.00 in Depth = 0.00 in LFooting Design Results fc = 3,000 Psi Minimum Footing Rebar Options ...... psi Minimum As % = 0.00000 00018 Toe Side...... Heel Side.... Rebar Cover @ Top = 2.00 in Not req'd Not req'd Rebar Cover @ Bottom = 3.00 in Mu < S' Fr Mu < S ` Fr Toe Heel ACI Factored Soil Pressure = 3,041 0 psf Mu': From Upward Loads = 0 0 ft-# Mu': From Downward Loads = 0 0 ft-# Mu: Used For Design = 0 4,316 ft-# Actual One -Way Shear = 0.00 Key Reinforcement: Not Req'd = Mu<S*Fr 35.33 psi Allowable One -Way Shear = 0.00 93.11 psi Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 5.036 Ibs Summary of Stem Section Designs.... ...resultant ecc. = 11.45 in Top: 10 in Conc, #6@18.00 in@Cntr, From 6.3 ft to 3.0 ft Soil Pressure @ Toe = 2,172 <= 3,000 psf 2nd: 10 in Conc, #6@18.00 in@Cntr, From 3.0 ft to 0.0 ft Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 <= 3,000 psf ACI Factored Press @ Toe ACI Factored Press @ Heel Footing Shear @ Toe = Footing Shear @ Heel = WALL STABILITY RATIOS Overtuming Stability Ratio Sliding Ratio Ratio 3,041 psf 0 psf 0.0 <= 93.1 psi 35.3 <= 93.1 psi = 2.72 1.02 Ratio < 1.5! RECEIVED MAR 2.3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS FI ID 1,e ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206) 522-6698 Title : Edmonds Office Building Job 0 00094000 Dsgnr. TDM Date: 3:10PM, 19 MAR 01 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade parking level. Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope: Foundations �". 510001 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Page 2' Description tank - water only, no lid Stem Design & Construction Top Stem 2nd Stem Design location for stem is at Stem OK Stem OK this height above footing = 3.00 ft 0.00 ft Wall Material Above "Ht" = Concrete Concrete Thickness = 10.00 in 10.00 in Rebar Size = # 6 # 6 Rebar Spacing = 18.00 in 18.00 in Rebar Placed at = Center Center Design Data fb/FB + fa/Fa = 0.098 0.694 Total Force @ Section = 560.2 Ibs 2,071.9 Ibs Moment.... Actual = 606.9 ft-# 4,316.4 ft-# Moment..... Allowable = 6,219.3 ft-# 6,219.3 ft-# Axial Stress.... Actual = Axial Stress..... Allowable = Shear..... Actual = 9.34 psi 34.53 psi Shear..... Allowable = 93.11 psi 93.11 psi Bar Embed ABOVE Ht. = 12.00 in 13.42 in Bar Embed BELOW Ht. = 12.00 in 7.83 in Wall Weight = 125.0 psf 125.0 psf Rebar Depth 'd' = 5.00 in 5.00 in Masonry Data Ym = Fs = Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Modular Ratio'n' _ Short Term Factor = Equiv. Solid Thick. _ Concrete Data Pc = 3,000 psi 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi 60,000 psi RECEIVE® MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS P'01l 1 ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P.S. Seattle, Washington Voice: (206) 525-7569 Fax: (206) 522-6698 Title : Edmonds Office Building Job # 00094000 Dsgnr. TDM Date: 3:10PM, 19 MAR 01 Description : 2 story office building, 1 below grade parking level. Steel framing above grade, concrete walls bel Scope: Foundations Fwr s10001 Cantilevered Retaining Wall PagJ Description tank - water only, no lid Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1,794.2 2.53 4,535.4 Soil Over Heel 3,255.2 2.92 9,494.4 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Toe Active Pressure = 0.44 Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 781.3 0.42 325.5 Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weight = 1,000.0 2.50 2,500.0 Key Weight = Vert. Component = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = TOTALS = 1,794.2lbs O.T.M. = 4,535.4 5,036.5 R.M. = 12,319.9 • Resisting/Overtuming Ratio = 2.72 ,F•: Total used for Soil Pressure = 5.036.5 (+ Axial Live Load, - Vertical Soil Component) .Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Toe Surcharge Not Used To Resist Overturning Heel Surcharge Not Used To Resist Overtuming RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERS -NORTHWEST INC. P.S. 6869 WOODLAWN AVE. N.E. - SUITE 205 - SEATTLE, WA 98115 - (206)525-7560 - FAX # (206) 522-6698 JOB No. LT-"l JOB NAME FnAl aJOS, OFFte__G DATE_sh-'IGI SUBJECT 4P,L.U^+4 ?7.0� Op- SHEET G�OF By `D.. AZ.- 1—E�KfGe"_( (!q_ opt e; 624tj&t&_r f ec3 Fe-^ 6f4- o,-, G Ric n n 6-1y(z- I� - (I-CjZ5?,S) - (C).3X717. a;) _ - 1�9.c k- q FrSGJ, Ge cc� A6 > L A,#O CJ/ tt f�►Kcaev�� ICY m = C�s.��C,.s ;lL = 4-z. z VL C � RECEIVE® MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Section 04100 Page 1 of 3 SECTION 04100 MORTAR AND MASONRY GROUT PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES: A. Mortar and grout for masonry. 1.02 SUBMITTALS: A. Samples: Submit two samples of mortar, illustrating mortar color and color range. 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE: A. Perform Work in accordance with ACI 530 and ACI 530.1. 1.04 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS: A. Cold Weather Requirements: IMIAC - Recommended Practices and Guide Specifications for Cold Weather Masonry Construction. B. Hot Weather Requirements: IMIAC - Recommended Practices and Guide Specifications for Hot Weather Masonry Construction. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS: A. Portland Cement: ASTM C150, Type I, gray color. B. Mortar Aggregate: ASTM C144, standard masonry type. C. Hydrated Lime: ASTM C207, Type S. D. Grout Aggregate: ASTM C404. E. Water: Clean and potable. F. Bonding Agent: Latex type. RSC:51VED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELC9MEN SERVICES EDMONS CTR. PKJB Architectural Group ,9ETSG(B Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Section 04100 Page 2 of 3 2.02 MORTAR MIXES: A. Mortar for Load Bearing Walls and Partitions: ASTM C270, Type S using the Property Method. B. Mortar for Non -load Bearing Walls and Partitions: ASTM C270, Type N using the Property Method. C. Mortar for Reinforced Masonry: ASTM C270, Type S using the Property Method. D. Pointing Mortar for Masonry: ASTM C270, Type N, using the Property Method; with maximum 2 percent ammonium stearate or calcium stearate per cement weight. E. Stain Resistant Pointing Mortar: One part Portland cement, 1/8 part hydrated lime, and two parts graded (80 mesh) aggregate, proportioned by volume. Add aluminum tristearate, calcium stearate, or ammonium stearate equal to 2 percent of Portland cement by weight. 2.03 MORTAR MIXING: A. Thoroughly mix mortar ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with ASTM C270. B. Add admixtures in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. C. Do not use anti -freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of mortar. 2.04 GROUT MIXES: A. Bond Beams, Lintels and Engineered Masonry, 3,000 psi strength at 28 days; 8-10 inches slump; mixed in accordance with ASTM C476 Fine grout. 2.05 GROUT MIXING: A. Thoroughly mix mortar ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with ASTM C476 Fine grout. B. Do not use anti -freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of grout. 2.06 MIX TESTS: A. Test mortar and grout in accordance with Section 01001. RECEIVED B. Testing of Mortar Mix: In accordance with ASTM C780. MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r,TR CITY OF EDMONDS PKJB Architectural Group Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Section 04100 Page 3 of 3 C. Testing of Grout Mix: In accordance with ASTM C 1019. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION AND PREPARATION: A. Apply bonding agent to existing concrete surfaces. 3.02 INSTALLATION: A. Install mortar and grout in accordance with premix mortar manufacturer's instructions. B. Work grout into masonry cores and cavities to eliminate voids. Do not displace reinforcement. END OF SECTION RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF EDMO DS CTFi. PKJB Architectural Group GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING 2ND AVENUE SOUTH EDMONDS, WASHINGTON E-9280 August 31, 2000 PREPARED FOR HUGH S. FERGUSON C/O PKJB ARCHITECTURAL GROUP Project Manager 54 P�A Kyle R. Campe Manager of Geotech 4 I EXPW= 01.96 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 IMPORTANT INFORMATION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences. The following suggestions and observations are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, cost -overruns and other costly headaches that can occur during a construction project. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT -SPECIFIC FACTORS A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique set of project -specific factors. These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and configuration: the location of the structure on the site and its orientation: physical concomitants such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, and the level of additional risk which the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors which change subsequent to the date of the report may affect its recommendations. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not be used: • When the nature of the proposed structure is changed, for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- frigerated one: • when the size or configuration of the proposed structure is altered: • when the location or orientation of the proposed structure is modified: • when there is a change of ownership, or • for application to an adjacent site. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- ered in their report's development have changed. MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken, when they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- technical engineers who then render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions, -their likely reaction to proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda- tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be needed, and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly - changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- neering report is based on conditions which existed at the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have ,been affected by time. Speak with the geo- technical consultant to learn if additional tests are advisable before construction starts. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground- water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND PERSONS Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer. J A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION Costly problems can occur when other design profes- sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a geotechnical engineering report. Th help avoid these problems, the geotechnical engineer should be retained to work with other appropriate design profes- sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues. BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE ENGINEERING REPORT Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- neers based upon their interpretation of field logs (assembled by site personnel) and laboratory evaluation of field samples. Only final boring logs customarily are included in geotechnical engineering reports. These logs should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion. When this occurs, delays, disputes and unantici pated costs are the all -too -frequent result. To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- tion, give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- der the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming re- sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps pre- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical consultants. To help prevent this problem, geotechnical engineers have developed model clauses for use in writ- ten transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto someone else. Rather, they are definitive clauses which identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved rec- ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- priate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your geotechnical engineering report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your geo- technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE RISK Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- igate risk. In addition, ASFE has developed a variety of materials which may be beneficial. Contact ASFE for a complimentary copy of its publications directory. Published by r=PRACT,C,NG THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 August 27, 2000 Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group 603 Stewart Street, Suite 707 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Robert Kroese Dear Mr. Kroese: Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists & Environmental Scientists E-9280 We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Edmonds Office Building, 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our proposal dated June 8, 2000. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be developed generally as ' planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. Medium dense to very dense silty sand and sandy silt soils were observed at our boring locations. In our opinion, the proposed office building can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on competent native soils. Temporary shoring, or a combination of shoring and temporary slopes will be necessary to construct the proposed below -grade parking level. Recommendations for foundation support and shoring ' are presented in this report. ' We appreciate this opportunity to serve you on this project. If you have questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. ' Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1� ' Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services ' RAC/KRC/jmp 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 . Bellevue (425) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670 1 i 1 fl 1 1 n TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9280 PAGE INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 General 1 ProjectDescription............................................................................................ 1 SITE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... Surface ............................................................................................................ Subsurface ....................................................................................................... Groundwater LaboratoryTesting............................................................................................ DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... General Site Preparation and General Earthwork........................................................... ShoringSystem............................................. .................................................... SoilNailing.............................................................................................. Cantilevered Soldier Piles .......................................................................... Soldier Piles ............................................................................................. Lagging....................................................................................... ShoringMonitoring................................................................................... Foundations Seismic Design Considerations Permanent Retaining and Foundation Walls ............................................. Slab -on -Grade Floors SiteDrainage.................................................................................................. Excavations and Slopes.......................................................... .......•..............•.... Rockeries Utility Support and Backfill................................................................................. Pavement Areas LIMITATIONS AdditionalServices............................................................................................ 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 14 14 1 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 Plate 6 Plate 7 Plate A 1 Plates A2 and A7 Plates 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9280 Field Exploration Laboratory Test Results Vicinity Map Boring Location Plan Cantilever Wall Design Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill Retaining Wall Sheet Drain Design Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Typical Utility Trench Fill Legend Boring Logs Grain Size Analyses 1 -- General 1 1 n I 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING 2ND AVENUE SOUTH EDMONDS, WASHINGTON E-9280 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed office building to be located on 2"d Avenue South and James Street in Edmonds, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions encountered, develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building location, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description We understand the proposed development will consist of a two-story office building, with one below grade parking level. To construct the below grade level, we estimate excavations of up to approximately twelve (12) feet will be necessary. The deepest excavations will be required at the northeast corner of the site. At the southwest corner of the building site, we understand minimal excavations will be necessary to achieve the building subgrade elevation. We understand the proposed office building will be constructed with little or no offset from the property lines of the site. Shoring or a combination of shoring and open cut excavations will be necessary to construct the below grade parking level. Based on our understanding of the maximum excavation depths, conventional cantilever shoring or soil nailing can be considered for shoring the excavation. We anticipate the building construction for the lower parking levels will consist of reinforced concrete and post -tensioned slabs. The upper levels of office space will consist of steel frame or wood frame construction. Slab -on -grade construction will be used for the lower parking level floor. At the time this report was prepared, design loads for the proposed structure were not available. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we estimate column loads for the proposed building will be in the range of 200 to 400 kips. We anticipate slab -on - grade loading for the parking levels will be approximately 150 pounds per square foot (psf). Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 1 Il GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY r Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 2 r If the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the I recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. I Surface I ITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located northeast of the intersection of 2"d Avenue South and James Street, Edmonds, Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The property is rectangular in shape, with dimensions of approximately one hundred and forty two (142) feet by one hundred and twenty (120) feet. The property and footprint of the proposed office building is schematically represented on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The general site topography slopes gradually to the south and southwest. Approximately the south half of the property is currently developed with a single -story CMU building and pavement areas. ISubsurface 1 it The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling three borings at the approximate locations shown on the Boring Location Plan (Plate 2). Please refer to Appendix A (Plates A2 through A7) for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Medium dense to very dense silty sand and sandy silt glacial till soils were observed at the exploration sites. The dense to very dense soil conditions were generally observed below a depth of approximately five feet below the existing ground surface. Based on the conditions observed at the boring locations, it is our opinion competent native soils suitable for support of foundations should be encountered at the subgrade elevation of the proposed excavation. Due to the moisture sensitive nature of the native soils, unstable subgrade conditions may develop if the soils are exposed to excessive moisture. IGroundwater I Light to moderate groundwater seepage was generally observed below a depth of approximately eight feet. Based on the groundwater seepage conditions observed, measures to control seepage will likely be necessary during the excavation phase of construction. In our opinion, based on the soil and groundwater conditions observed, we do not anticipate groundwater seepage will create significant stability problems along the excavation. However, if localized areas of heavy groundwater seepage are encountered, a series of sumps can be used to collect and discharge groundwater from the excavation. Earth Consultants, Inc. r iJ 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ' Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 3 1 Fluctuations in groundwater levels and intensity should be expected depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally groundwater levels are �. higher in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). 1 I I 1 I 1 1 r� Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory, tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs, or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in -situ soil conditions. Our recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. Temporary and permanent support of the below grade excavation, foundation support, and reducing post -construction settlements are the primary geotechnical engineering considerations for the development. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed office building can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on competent native soils. Given the below grade excavations planned for the development, we anticipate competent native soils will be exposed at footing grades. We understand maximum excavations of approximately twelve (12) feet will be necessary to construct the proposed below grade parking level. Earth Consultants, Inc. 11 I Ll GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group August 31, 2000 E-9280 Page 4 Temporary shoring, or a combination of shoring and temporary slopes will be necessary to construct the excavation for the below -grade level. In our opinion, conventional cantilever shoring or soil nailing can be considered for the shored portions of the excavation. Recommendations regarding excavation support and foundations are presented in the following sections of the report. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Hugh S. Ferguson and his representatives. The report was prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building area should be stripped and cleared of existing structures, pavement areas, and ' other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes intended to be abandoned, should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Once the building area has been stripped, installation of the shoring and excavation for the below grade parking level can begin. ECI should be on -site to observe the shoring and excavation operations. ECI should also observe the bottom of the excavation to identify areas of unstable subgrade. The use of rock ballast can be considered for stabilizing unstable areas of the excavation bottom, if necessary. The use of a woven geotextile below the rock ballast will help bridge unstable subgrade soils, if necessary. ' Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a well graded granular material having a maximum size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. During dry weather, non -organic compactible soil, at or near its optimum moisture content, can be used as structural fill. The silty sand soils encountered at our exploration sites are suitable for use as structural fill, provided the soils are near their optimum moisture content at the time of placement, and provided the soils are placed during dry weather conditions. At the time of our exploration, the silty sand soils were at or slightly above the optimum moisture content. u Ll Earth Consultants, Inc. F1 �1 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 5 I I 1 1 j Ll Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load -bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density. The maximum dry density should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Shoring System Portions of the proposed excavation will require the use of temporary shoring. In our opinion, due to the proposed excavation depths, conventional cantilevered shoring consisting of soldier piles and lagging can be considered for temporary support of the excavation. If the acquisition of easements around the perimeter of the site is feasible, soil nailing can also be considered for support of the excavation. To reduce the height of the temporary shoring, temporary slopes can be constructed above the wall in areas where there is available space, or where easements have been granted. For preliminary design purposes, temporary slopes constructed above the temporary shoring can be inclined at 1 H:1 V (Horizontal: Vertical). Soil Nailing Due to the dense to very dense soil conditions at the site, and the cemented nature of the deposit, soil nailing is a viable alternative to soldier piles and lagging. Soil nailing is often a more economical alternative to conventional soldier pile and lagging shoring systems. On a square footage basis, soil nailing is typically in the range of $20 to $25. Conventional soldier pile and lagging shoring systems are usually in the range of $35 to $40 per square foot. ECI can provide a soil nail design for the planned excavation shoring, if requested. 1 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 I n P, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 6 Cantilevered Soldier Piles Cantilevered shoring should be designed to resist the active earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty (30) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This lateral earth pressure value assumes a horizontal backfill, no surcharges, and dewatered conditions around the excavation. Temporary slopes constructed above the proposed temporary shoring will impart higher lateral earth pressures on the shoring. An active earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty-five (45) pcf can be used for shoring where slopes inclined at 1 H:1 V are present above the shoring. ECI can provide modified equivalent fluid pressures to account for sloping conditions above the shoring that are different from those described above. Where applicable, surcharge loading from adjacent structures, vehicles, or any other load source should be included in the shoring design. Surcharges from adjacent roadways or buildings should be considered if the load source is within a horizontal distance equal to the excavation depth. To account for traffic surcharge loads, a two foot soil surcharge should be added to the temporary shoring wall design, where applicable. Passive pressure acting along the embedded portion of the soldier piles may be used to resist active earth pressures and surcharge loading. The passive earth pressure may be calculated using an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of four hundred fifty (450) pcf. The upper two ' feet of the embedded portion of the soldier pile should be neglected when calculating passive resistance. This value of equivalent fluid pressure includes a factor -of -safety of 1.5. The passive resistance can be applied to two times the diameter of the soldier piles. Mobilization of full passive pressure assumes that the excavation bottom is horizontal for at least four times the depth of the soldier pile embedment. ECI should be contacted to provide appropriate design values if sloping conditions are present along the excavation bottom. A typical pressure distribution for a temporary cantilever wall design is shown on Plate 3. ' Soldier Piles Soldier piles must penetrate far enough below the bottom of the excavation to prevent wall movement, and provide sufficient resistance to compression loads, where applicable. As mentioned previously, passive resistance along the embedded portion of the pile can be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure of four hundred fifty (450) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The allowable capacity of the soldier piles in compression can be developed from a combination of end bearing at the tip of the pile and skin friction along the shaft of the pile. For design purposes, we recommend using an allowable end bearing of thirty (30) kips per square foot (ksf) for piles penetrating at least ten (10) feet below the excavation level. Resistance along the embedded portion of the pile shaft can be calculated using a unit skin friction value of 0.75 ksf for piles penetrating at least ten (10) below the excavation level. Above the excavation level, frictional resistance along the soldier pile should be neglected. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 7 Based on the soil conditions observed at the boring locations, we do not anticipate casing of ' the soldier pile excavations will be necessary. The. piling contractor, however, should be prepared to case the excavations if groundwater seepage and caving of the excavation are encountered. The success of open hole excavations without casing should be verified at the ' beginning of construction. The bottom of the soldier pile excavations should be free of loose soil and standing water prior to placing the structural concrete or lean mix. If an excessive amount of groundwater is encountered at the bottom of the holes, the concrete should be Itremied into the holes. Lagging ' The effects of soil arching between the soldier piles allows the lagging to be designed with a reduced value of lateral earth pressure. For soldier piles with a center to center spacing of at least three pile diameters, a 50 percent reduction of the lateral earth pressures can be used for the design of lagging. ' Lagging installed between the soldier piles is used to support the sides of the excavation, and helps prevent subsidence at the ground surface around the excavation. When the excavation begins, installation of the lagging should begin immediately to help prevent sloughing of the excavation. The contractor should be prepared to address the potential for sloughing of the excavation during the lagging operation. Groundwater seepage may also contribute to sloughing. The void space between the excavation and the back of the lagging should be backfilled with a free -draining material. The backfill should not prevent or impede the passage of groundwater, so that hydrostatic pressures are not generated. Areas of sloughing behind the lagging should be repaired by injecting lean mix into the sloughed area, where necessary. Shoring Monitoring Whenever excavations are made adjacent to existing streets, utilities and structures, there exists the potential for movements. A monitoring program should include the surveying of adjacent streets and structures for purposes of detecting any horizontal or vertical movements during construction. We recommend the establishment of a monitoring program such that excessive movements are detected early, to allow for remedial actions to be taken to prevent serious damage to adjacent facilities and structures. Prior to beginning the proposed excavation, we recommend performing a detailed photo and video tape survey of the adjacent roadways and structures. Periodic monitoring of these structures should be performed throughout the duration of construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. Ll 1 1 1 1 C GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PUB Architectural Group August 31, 2000 E-9280 Page 8 Survey points should be established along the temporary shoring wall to monitor horizontal and vertical movements during the excavation phase of construction. The survey points should be established and monitored by a licensed surveyor. ECI should meet with the contractor and surveyor prior to the installation of the shoring to discuss the location of the monitoring points, and to establish a program for acquiring the readings. All readings should be reviewed by an engineer from our office. We estimate lateral movements at the top of the shoring should not exceed one inch. However, movements in excess of one inch may occur as a result of construction related disturbances or unforeseen site conditions. Movements in excess of one inch will be evaluated, and remedial measures will be recommended, if necessary. Fni inrlatinnc In our opinion, the proposed structure can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on competent native soils. Given the subsurface conditions encountered at our exploration sites, and the anticipated depth of the proposed excavation, we anticipate competent native soils will be exposed at footing grade throughout the majority of the site. Unstable soils encountered at footing grade, however, should be overexcavated. Footing areas that are overexcavated can be replaced with structural fill, or the footing can be extended down into competent native soils. The use of lean mix concrete can also be considered for replacing overexcavated areas. Footing overexcavations that are replaced with structural fill should extend horizontally beyond the edges of the footing a distance that is equal to one-half the depth of the overexcavation. For foundations bearing on competent, undisturbed native soils, an allowable soil bearing capacity of eight thousand (8,000) psf can be used. Footings bearing on lean mix used to fill overexcavations can also be designed using an allowable soil bearing capacity of eight thousand (8,000) psf. Footings bearing on structural fill should be designed using an allowable soil bearing capacity of three thousand (3,000) psf. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor -of -safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. Assuming foundation support for the proposed structure is in accordance with the recommendations contained in this report, we expect total settlements of approximately one inch and differential settlement of approximately one-half inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 1 F1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 9 Exterior foundations elements should be placed a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. ' Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil, and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the ' foundation. The foundation excavations must be backfilled with structural fill to establish adequate passive resistance around the foundation elements. As an alternative, the foundations can be poured "neat" against competent native soils. Resistance to lateral loads from passive earth pressures can be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.40 may be used for foundation elements bearing on competent native soils or structural fill. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, and a factor -of -safety of 1.5 has been included. t Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. 1 Seismic Design Considerations I The Puget Sound region is classified as Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Sound region have been subcrustal (intraplate) events, ranging in depth from fifty (50) to seventy (70) kilometers. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. Weaver and Shedlock (1989) researched the probable or known source areas for the crustal, intraplate, and subduction zone earthquakes in the Washington and Oregon area. Crustal and intraplate earthquakes are the only events in Washington and Oregon in which there is a historical record. Shallow crustal earthquakes occur within the North American Plate, and typically do not exceed focal depths of approximately 20 kilometers. Intraplate earthquakes occur in the subducting Juan de Fuca plate, and typically occur below depths of 40 kilometers. The subduction zone earthquake, in which there is no historical record in the Washington and Oregon area, would have its source along the interface between the North American Plate and the subducting Juan de Fuca Plate. Magnitude 8 + earthquakes are thought to be possible along this interface, and would occur at depths of approximately 50 to 60 kilometers (Weaver and Shedlock, 1989). Earth Consultants, Inc. FA L1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group August 31, 2000 E-9280 Page 10 The UBC Earthquake regulations have established a series of soil profile types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions encountered, it is our opinion that soil type Sc from Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC should be used for design. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures with foundations founded in the liquefying soils. Groundshaking of ' sufficient duration results in the loss of grain -to -grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid for short periods of time. LJ I 1, To have potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium -dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the site, it is our opinion that the site has a low susceptibility to liquefaction. The medium dense to very dense native soil condition underlying the proposed building site is the primary basis for this conclusion. Permanent Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures from the retained soils, and any surcharge loading. For walls designed to yield a minimum of 0.002 times the height of the wall, lateral earth pressures can be calculated using an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty (30) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). For non -yielding walls, the equivalent fluid pressure should be increased to forty-five (45) pcf. The above lateral earth pressure values assume horizontal backfill conditions. The above lateral earth pressure values assume no surcharges due to traffic, adjacent foundations, construction loads, or any other loadings. If surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressures. Two feet should be added to the wall height to account for traffic surcharges, where applicable. If design against earthquake loading is desired, a rectangular pressure distribution equal to six times the wall height (6H) should be added to the above lateral earth pressure values. Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 I j 1 1 F1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group August 31, 2000 E-9280 Page 11 The walls should be provided with a perforated drain pipe and backfilled with a free -draining material. The free -draining material should extend at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. For retaining walls formed against the temporary shoring, a sheet drain such as Mira -Drain 6000 or equivalent can be used. A typical wall backfill and drainage detail, and sheet drain detail are provided on Plates 4 and 5, respectively. Slab -on -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors can be supported on competent native soils or structural fill. Slab -on - grade floors supported on competent native soils or structural fill can be designed using a modulus of subgrade reaction of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic inch (pci). The slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free - draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. The use of concrete additives can also be considered in lieu of the plastic membrane vapor barrier. The manufacturer of these products should be contacted for information regarding product use. ECI can provide names of manufactures, if requested. Site Drainage During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site and away from the building site. Perimeter footing drains should be installed to help reduce the potential for water infiltration. The perimeter drains for the permanent foundation walls formed against the shoring (Plate 5) will serve this purpose for the areas of below grade construction. A typical footing drain detail for a conventional shallow footing is provided on Plate 6. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing or foundation wall drain systems. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group August 31, 2000 E-9280 Page 12 In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the'limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our exploration, the upper deposits of silty sand and sandy silt soils would be classified as Type B by OSHA. As such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 H:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). Based on our observations, the dense to very dense silty sand and sandy silt soils observed below depths of approximately five feet would be classified as Type A soils. Slopes in these soils should be inclined no steeper than 0.75H:1 V. Temporary slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting to protect the slopes from raveling or erosion. An ECI representative should observe excavations to verify the OSHA soil type classification. If slopes cannot be constructed in accordance with the OSHA regulations, temporary shoring may be necessary. The presence of groundwater seepage on the face of temporary slopes may cause localized areas of piping, and may require additional flattening of the slope or the use of rock ballast to reduce erosion and instability. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1 V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of slopes. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Rockeries If rockeries are planned at the site, the construction should be in accordance with the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Guidelines. Rockeries are erosion control features, and are not intended to function as retaining structures. ECI should observe excavations made for rockeries, and periodically observe the rockery construction. In areas where rockeries are placed in front of fills, greater than four feet, the use of geogrid reinforcement within the fills may be necessary. ECI can provide recommendations for reinforced earth fills, if necessary. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. The presence of groundwater seepage should be expected in the deeper utility trench excavations. Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson ' c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 13 Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve 0 2) Inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non -load supporting areas is presented on Plate 7. a. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Cement treatment and cement kiln -dust treatment can also be considered for repairing unstable areas of pavement subgrade. The following pavement section for lightly -loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck -traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for truck - trafficked areas: • Three inches of. AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four and one-half inches of ATB. These pavement thicknesses may be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frequency. Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Hugh S. Ferguson c/o PKJB Architectural Group E-9280 August 31, 2000 Page 14 I Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557 laboratory test standard. - LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No ' warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between the test locations may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. L. ! I Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 11 I 11 Reference: Puget Sound Area Snohomish County / Map 454 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2000 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists Vicinity Map Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Drwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Pro]. No. 9280 Checked RAC Date 8/28/00 Plate 1 ' 18 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of \ \ color. ECI cannot be responsible for ✓\ any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black \ \ 19 \ \ & white reproductions of this plate. \ \ yJ \ \ n � \ '•1 iy-�4 �� (rk. }tW �� d�S.r AH M t J'�S+t4 VJ3.t SNAk \ \ / 1p, t� s ,.F rtG !r Kt I. n ,/i"_8 3 •t�jr� / 7� h� s� is -.;( \'roi it t4 IS•di. i fA�4 � '� .,t < 0 n x• �. w. , f C / a5 G a+ SjKe`s I �t u y\Jl ny^ ,7e N r"'A ;� Y� tt,o �J 7`�uc j � I �� . e it Ll`•` a'rJ�a`� t1a r .+ ,3�\ � l(S + ' / S ,\ r t ^.lir .. t*rt i1P > r�'_-; ,d f t,.Nl ty\ , i x'' X '`% ✓. / '•� 1 !� 1`r< [` `\\t. j, t �nfi � 1_ d 1'.:Yr � + \ - x;fir ,/ / t.•i(i's J y_, r w s+\.� \ I (>rr ' ,.c < 7 X� 7a ,*- \ \ �"'' �. , % r ski 1 r, I .M ro r �s,vf ar ,ei \ �\ ;�?t `Y Ji , <; 47 1 .. a i �h. 'r�•\ /IgJa$ Ijr Srt QJ '1231 � P�I ys � t: Jo(\rt�3t. �t srz•4:�r :s / f. ti 1 X t rfn ��t\ ,) \� * ,_.r:i I , +•. k 3,r � (Z 6t � m'.Y("ii, I�t t�j \ }. - �� r YJ 1( # y, �'f �. o� �,/ / -r. /i Z. rotll tir,� rj•' �;�/j Je ;\ % '7M \\ \\� t �raro r��5 �•�; �t / s \• s TRFFr LEGEND B-1—e— Approximate Location of •% Approximate Scale 0 15 30 60ft. ECI Boring, Proj. No. E-9280, Aug. 2000 f. <. •'••'R''b Subject Site Earth Consultants, Inc. Geolechnscal Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists 22 Lot Number Boring Location Plan Edmonds Office Building Approximate Footprint of Edmonds, Washington Proposed Building i - - - - - Drwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Pro]. No. 9280 Existing Building - - - - - Checked RAC Date 8/28/00 Plate 2 PASSIVE PRESSURE 0 I �=IIIc111 IIIv10 --�..•, III 111 t ` t ` t ' t ` t ` _- .4 --------- -----� -- �----------------- k------------- -..... ACTIVE t PRESSURE ---V ---------------------- ---t�--------------------------- H-- .--------------------------- =`, ---',---------------------------......,, I , -- -------------------- ._------ t ............_........................ --� ....................................... I , ---� t............................................... , --A - ------------------------- - I --.44 ------------ -------------------------------------- NOTES: z 1) Active Pressure is taken as an equivalent fluid weight of 30 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for horizontal area above wall. 45 pcf SCHEMATIC ONLY — NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING for 1 H : 1 V temporary slope above wall assumes no surcharge loading. 2) Passive Pressure is taken as an equivalent fluid weight of 450 pcf acting on twice the soldier piles diameter. Neglect upper 2 feet in design. 3) Add 2 feet soil surcharge above wall where applicable for traffic loading. INEarth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists 6 Environmental Scientists CANTILEVER WALL DESIGN Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Drwn. GLS . Date Aug. 2000 Prof. No. 9280 Checked RAC Date 8128✓00 Plate 3 J 1 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING I� Excavated Slope WEEP HOLE DETAIL Perforated Pipe Wrapped -- with Filter Fabric Ili i ft. min. ..,. ,.,., "p�. o' 0•�.�•'' '•� `off ••e• .:'.o:�.a. 1 ft. in. Compacted Subgrade Pa 9 i — LEGEND j STANDARD NOTES Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. 18 inches minimum of free draining gravel. Unclassified backfill 90 percent relative compaction. 1 inch minus rock or pea gravel. 1) Classified backfill should consist of granular soil having no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve and no particles greater than 4 inches. in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the #4 sieve should be between 25 and 75 percent. 2) Unclassified backfill should be free of organics, clayey soils, debris and other deleterious materials. It should be placed at or below the optimum moisture content. 3) For free -draining walls, weep holes may be used. Surround each weep hole with 3 cubic feet of 1 inch minus rock. 4) Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Drain line should be bedded on and surrounded with free draining 1 inch minus rock or pea gravel, as desired. The drain rock may be encapsulated with a geotechnical drainage fabric at the engineers discretion. RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL Ealth Consultants Inc. Edmonds Office Building echnk�' Fnghwem C`°'°g�&Fnvim'renrWS``nfism Edmonds, Washington Proj. No. 9280 Drwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 1 Checked RAC Date 8/28100 Plate 4 WOOD LAGGING A 11 LE NATIVE SOIL 11( EXCAVATION III -Ill CONCRETE FACING CONTINUOUS MIRADRAIN 6000 OR EQUIVALENT SLAB -ON -GRADE FLOOR III_" `" � � •�' D•- � � �' • • `� • T, 111 (I(( PVC TIGHTLINE o J e o eG �. o a _ STRUCTURAL FILL FOUNDATION e v DRAIN GRATE � - a � _ � . �- •' � �:' - �11=��=�« =III= NOTE: DRAIN THROUGH WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT MIDDLE OF LAGGING. SCHEMATIC ONLY — NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING RETAINING WALL SHEET DRAIN DESIGN Earth Consultants Inc. Edmonds Office Building Ceaediniol En&V oc s CCOi0$ 6 Env"o--M l Scx nstS Edmonds, Washington Proj. No. 9280 Drwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/28100 Plate 5 1 I 1 n 1 1 11 1 •o Slope To Drain 6 inch min. - o - ° e "vW.° ° ° i o , ° a' %:. ° • ° 18 inch min. 4 inch min. !•°" • �° • •_` •�• ,•• _ °� ° o'.'. '� ' ° ° ° ° - Diameter Perforated Pipe—� ' ::..' ° ° o o ° ° a o ; • ° " • ° Wrapped in Drainage - " • ° ° ' ° ° ° Fabric = •..= .• �.• ° ,° a°, °• -° ° ° ° ° 1 ,•,e• .o._s• 2 inch min. 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. Earlh Consultants Inc. Proj. No. 9280 1 Drwn. GLS I Date Aug. 2000 TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington Checked RAC Date 8/28/00 1 Plate 6 Non -Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas I- --- -I- Backfill Bedding Varies 1 Foot Minimum Varies Varies LEGEND: Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab o.a o•. . o o . Base Material or Base Rock Backfill; Compacted On -Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and °a0 oa; p Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL Earth Consultants Inc. Edmonds Office Building GraetcMiCW Fnpwrm Geobo l h hnvim ff ntal _1k- ntia+s Edmonds, Washington Proj. No. 9280 Drwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/28/00 Plate 7 1 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9280 Our field exploration was performed on July 7, 2000. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three borings to a maximum depth of twenty-six (26) feet below the ' existing grade. The approximate boring locations were determined by field observations and the survey for the property. The locations and elevations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are ' shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test site, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System that is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. ILI I I 1 1 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 GRAPH LETTER MAJOR DIVISIONS iSYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Well -Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand GraGW d e 0 e Q o gW Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels Clean r • Gp Poorly -Graded Gravels, Gravel - Gravelly (little or no fines) Coarse Soils ' I e I ' gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Grained GM Silty Gravels, Gravel-Sand- Soils More Than 50% Coarse Gravels With gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Retained On Fines ( appreciable amount of fines) GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel - Sand - No. 4 Sieve gc Clay Mixtures o 00 'o SW Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sand And Clean Sand o �' o SW I Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy ( little or no fines) 'w; SP Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than 50% Material Soils Q: ;4 Q ^:;:ff:• o:>s>?tk>::; Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than SM No. 200 Sieve 50% Coarse Sands With Sm Silty Sands, Sand - Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Fines (appreciable SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures PassiSteveng No. 4 amount of fines) ML Inorganic Silts & Very Fine Sands, Rock FloLr,Silty- ml Clayey Fine Sands; Clayey Silts w/ Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays I I I QL Organic Silts And Organic I I I I I I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Smaller Tran Silts Liquid Limit And CFI Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils pl With High Organic Contents Topsoil ' y y J Humus And Duff Layer Fill Hlyhly Variable Constituents The discussion In the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING, tsf I 2' O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING, tsf W MOISTURE, % dry weight 24' I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY, lbs. per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT, % Q DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION l Earth Consultants Inc. (kvux lulical lingi,wnss, Gz>lul(L+'I5 6 1v lvinHurw7e.d 51.x:nlbls I SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/ DATE LEGEND Proj. No. 9280 1Date Aug. 2000 1Plate Al Boring Log 1 1 1� I I I 1 ii Project Name: Edmonds Office Building Sheet of 1 1 2 Job No. 9280 Logged by: 1 RAC Start Date: 7ni00 Completion Date: 7n100 Boring No.: B-1 Drilling Contactor: Associated Drilling Method: HSA Sampling Method: SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned, sealed with bentonite Notes General % i ) No. Blows Ft. t E 0 U t a r% E U) a u) E U) Surface Conditions: Gravel Parking Lot a .i 11.3 16.7 14.s 11.8 12.2 58 23 ss 5216' 50/Y 1 2 3 4 5 s 7 $ s 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 SM (Gravel and Duff to 6") Light brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose to medium dense, moist -medium dense, moist to wet -predominantly gray, light seepage, dense -43% fines -very dense, moist -possible light seepage A Earth Consultants Inc. GcorcdtnkalFn8tiem- .Gm S^&FnArMilienralSdmtL�s Z Boring Log Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington m Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/7/00 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our ooservations at the time ano location or uus eynorarory Note, mwntau UY ci lynaw.o. a..o.ra. o.... judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of II.�/.II.1J}II.I. MaCOn}GI} I.I. }r.iC IM Boring Log 1 1 1 I IJ Project Name: Sheet of Edmonds Office Building 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 9280 1 RAC 7/7100 7/7100 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned, sealed with bentonite General W No. Blows L a° L 0. 0 M ai Notes o� Ft. ,� a c7 U) m to T cn 10.8 701 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, very dense, moist, oring terminate at 20.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 7.5 to 20.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 2 a a Boring Log W Earth Consultants Inc. Edmonds Office Building 8 Cw:Crrclinlcal FngMe:et& CR.*f C SN & EnvlrMimm",N lclmtLIN- Edmonds, Washington Z o Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/7100 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our ooservauons at ine rime ano location or tnis enpioratuly nine, IIIw11ICU uy C11y111-11IV —1 allal,a� ol.. judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of 1nf—#i— ...xn. #.A nn H.ic I— IBoring Log 1 1 I 1 �I 1 I Project Name: Edmonds Office Building Sheet of 1 2 Job No. 9280 Logged by: 1 RAC Start Date: 7/7/00 Completion Date: 7/7100 Boring No.: B-2 Drilling Contactor: Associated Drilling Method: HSA Sampling Method: SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piemmeter ®Abandoned, sealed with bentonite Notes General W No. Blows Ft. o T, C7 cn t LL E co n T cn Surface Conditions: Tall Grass 3 L 12.2 9.2 16.7 50/5" 50/5 * 50/4' ! !'I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 18 19 GP (Sod and Topsoil to 6" Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, loose, moist (Fill) SM Light brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist ML Grades to brown sandy SILT, dense to very dense, moist -predominantly gray -53% fines SM Grades to silty fine to medium SAND, very dense, moist -water added to auger for advancement to 20' -very dense Earth Consultants Inc. 0 cecxerYmk`al Fnglne tl.. Gm. -"tvs & Fnvlrnnnx,nraI StYrn1L o Boring Log Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington m Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date U7100 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this er0oratoryhole, mvamea oy ec iyu �ce� a iy �ca.a, aJ IQJYa5 ai na judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of infnm+ofinn rvuecn/c.d nn }h;c In.. IBoring Log P. 1 11 1 1 1 fi 1 1 Project Name: Sheet of 1 Edmonds Office Building 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 9280 1 RAC 7/7/00 7/7/00 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Pieiometer ® Abandoned, sealed with bentonite General W No. Blows t 2 r CL E rn Notes % i ) Ft. ,� T 0 rn ,i <n co T cn 10.7 70i4!' ! ` ` SM Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND with gravel, very dense, Boring terminated at 20.5 feet below e)asting grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 3 a U u Boring Log A Earth Consultants Inc. Edmonds Office Building '.� Ci .( . -it nw-aI Fnsrwx t5. Sdrntivs Edmonds, Washington 51 Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date U7100 Plate AS Subsurface conditions depicted represem our oDservatlons at the time ano Iocailon or tnts eWurawry noie, muun ieu ur ct iyn —1 n iy L-1 .. —Y a a, ,.w judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of nt<nIT7}Inn MOG�� nn rti�� I.v. IBoring Log 1 1 1 I 1 1 Project Name: Edmonds Office Building Sheet of 1 1 2 Job No. 9280 Logged by: 1 RAC Start Date: 7/7/00 Completion Date: 7/7100 Boring No.: B-3 Drilling Contactor: Associated Drilling Method: HSA Sampling Method: SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned, sealed with bentonite General Notes W M No. Blows Ft. t E U)i t CL C u E 0 M s E � u'i Surface Conditions: Tall Grass a 3 L 13.9 14.0 11.1 34 65 sofa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 SM (Sod and Topsoil to 6") Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose, moist (Fill) SM Light brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to wet -dense, moist t0 Wet -possible light seepage, very dense -increased sand content, iron o)ade staining, possible light seepage, very dense r Earth Consultants Inc. cr%xr in"IFngfiet%- Cc n *sN&FnNmnnxnralk-im-vs Boring Log Edmonds Office Building Edmonds, Washington z m Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/7/00 Plate A6 I Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and Location mints eitoratory nose, moatnea oy enylnetinny L='ta, ai 101Y�Q al n+ judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of nln�rn�finn nrmnnta� nn fFic IM Boring Log 1 1 t 1 J �I 1 Project Name: Sheet of 1 Edmonds Office Building 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 9280 1 RAC 717/00 7/7/00 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned, sealed with bentonite General W No. Blows t E L CL E 0 N E Notes % ( ) Ft. aai u- N 15.0 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, very dense, moist to sole wet, light to moderate seepage, interbedded sand lenses 21 22 U. 23 24 16.1 25 -very dense, moderate seepage 65/5 26 Boring terminated at 26.0 feet below eAsting grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 to 25.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 3 a L Boring Log $ Earth Consultants Inc. N Edmonds Office Building R;arcYinlcalFn8ft-t%s.Gec>gts+,&F-ron"Ienralkyrnt1SN Edmonds, Washington o Proj. No. 9280 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked RAC Date 8/7/00 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our ooservax=5 aI the ume anu .ucauun ui a ns c�vt aww y i ivic, n iwmcv aq .y...� ....y .....� ... . judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of nf-iinn .vncn 4_A nn #kI. inn APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9280 Earth Consultants, Inc. 0 d m 00 0 0 4 Copies DISTRIBUTION E-9280 Hugh S. Ferguson _ . c/o PKJB Architectural Group 603 Stewart Street, Suite 707 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Robert Kroese Earth Consultants, Inc APPROVED — DAJE All 41f 5 CITY OF EDMONDS - BLDG. DEPT. 2h Building Official zo I I fV9 R (ZA94-5 I RECEIVE,:) MAY 2 0 1995 PERIWITCOUARR City Of Edmonds Permit Nov GG�h-lti"Y/ RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTI'ON PERMIT Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B-. Type of Work (be specific): /��o%.(li�Ptt'� t/��✓�,•, C. Contractor: W �" c o.t co o -_1 C.. , Contact: H vs, cA.e r-(, Mailing Address: i34 S 01�.e , �s Ec1 �.� 5 Phone: L4 ZS - 7 7 zt - Lt l 26 State License #: U 1 j OC. /q 14 q o Liability Insurance: .v, 5 Bond.- $ l 2 ®u O D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ CityProject ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) ❑ Multi-Familys ❑ Si gle Family ❑ Other. INSPECTOR: f e�-W7!s, F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT:_ ❑•YES ❑ NO INDEMNITY: Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the_defe.0ezof any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. `� t THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK.. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be In accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required ,by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. / ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ . Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: (Contractor or Agent) Date: ab 2- Io q // FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved by: /44'4z '' Right-of-way Fee: 14-C)+ Time Authorized: Void After Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Special Conditions: x:ronm )Lt20 QA Restoration Fee: A i'iLot.. moo, vr�r:ta.: 44AT.,L I f.F: 5%2 Total Fee: ")1* Receipt No: " Issued by: _ UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODEJPh a 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: �� Y' -Q DATE: j Z e d Ins ector's Signature For inspection see Engineering Inspection Information handout. NO WORK SHALL 1317CIN PRIOR TO PI'�.IZMIT ISSUANCL __] I;;OATE RECEIVED / "' ��A;. PERMIT EXPIRES' PERMIT ZONE CITY OF EDMONDS USES' NUMBER��"`�� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB�""`SUITE/APT# ADDRESS ,.. ✓ OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS �' A,e' g PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. w MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $ Z TESCP Approved o (r-a g m /4�y t ( Gam. �" y I , " PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Permit Required Q 4.!# ( Street Use Permit Req'd Q CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required Q Sidewalk Required Q EAlr r1Ctt1k+••�,I1 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground fTt_ �� `i�`am, Wiring required Q NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED _ ~ O YES ❑ NO ❑ Z ,f W I_ ADDRESS REMARKS Z Z _ �� y /} y ry ( /y OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE Q © % wr+ 4 ew rW'✓ 1 ••.-" 7 .,� I T 6,...� / W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME g (...... ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE cc ADDRESS O y cr FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE CITY y� tit y r,p 9 .A P ZIP[�y}/�p'•�q� TELEPHONE 1'ny _ �"`/'y W wrSl•• �... �� __r•.. + I' '..._ram ,e"y ... , /y. t, ti STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION ATE C BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBN INSPECTION BOND .•�— �� POSTED REQ'D Iw' to l �;.• w CJ 4t l 7 VI ❑ YES ❑ NO SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT a PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED 4.�«LfL CX1I "t)c'�:1JCs: EXP RESIDENTIAL LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) NEW ❑ ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR 0 ❑ AUDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE F USE z PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE a ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN REQ'D PROVIDED ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ FENCE X FT) REMARKS ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER Z GARAGE ❑ CARPORT ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL O ROC KERY n (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: U n t in CHECKEDBY ITYPWFCONSTRgION CQDE, OCCUPANT yry w NUMBER ` L/ r \ NUMBER OF CRITICAL y� p '��,;. y� " GROUP Pf' m OF DWELLING �� AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPAN�i W' O STORIES 7, UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED ❑ YES LOAD 2. DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE ^ wrt REMARKS C7 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REII o m VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING w PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. C STATE SURCHARGE W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION N "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE W IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Ir ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ALL FEE c FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE RECEIPT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMEDTO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RE IP"F" y�i �„✓+ i t,� ,(': W TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION: AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, anc ' IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. + WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIA SIGN,' E • DATE LGNATURE (OWN O AGENT I DATE SIGNED (425) -' // -- +�. " b ... �,� 771-0220 R l :'i c- R CE ED BY DATE � y ATT NTION EXT 1333 �� IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771'0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL- FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR u CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER • GOLD - ASSESSOR s/9B D�RECEIVED 1 PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS USE ZONE '� , PERMIT t;.�.NUMBER JOB SUITE/APTB ADDRESS /i i Sc, PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO w MAILINWADORESS LID FEE $ TESCP Approved Q C «�) 6 �.� "1 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Permit Required 0 O 1', , r." ,•, � J :...� C) J „� �� I ^! � EXISTING PROPOSED-q InspectionRequiredreet Use Permit egd O O CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Sidewalk Required O I J' REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground -..�G�rl °'? 1 G=� ,� !r Wldng required O NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED p.•y ((zz 1 .I 1 I J ir� Y'1 t f i YES ❑ NO ❑ C9 1- C e' ��:' i2 r.l ti•� ✓ _ ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z CC S u . w z ; CITY ZIP TELEPHONE^'r p� 1 IT � �.. ey" '1 •"^,V .i, ;.'° ;V' � 1 S c. A •�. � ,d. �.,I �� I S:.' J f G'� r�',4 6, 3 n� � NAME a "..% e }' �'• 1 '' -� .. f °: J't'-r ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE tx ADDRESS O H a J f (Gi y(i r. /'i d4 1 t FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE y r I G f„1 �,) J W CC IL . is "'� L' I zCI``TY ZIP TELEPHONE ~) ^/ 7 s +(� J K1 C 0( <+ STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBn INSPECTION BOND /p + REO'D POSTED C J /`t'1 �"T li _`j J (�,': ✓„� I ( ,.��GG 1' -f //� lI. ❑ YES [:)NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. J 1L51-`s-o0 1 CC-).a0]I'C)Ct¢_Jm � l.JC`�+i i )v%'J' `'JcJ' r7 I [:':"'1 EXP NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (Ff.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR ADDITION Q COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR Z CHANGE OF USE Z PARKING REO'D I PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL 0 APARTMENT SIGN a REPAIR 11 GRADING 0 FENCE REMARKS CYDS X FT) DEMOLISH O TANK OTHER Z GARAGE CARPORT 0 WALL RENEWAL RRETAINING O (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKEDBY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT a rr f� U I cl i\ J-• / dJ" !f [�L. - , i_ GROUP w NUMBER NUMBER OF " CRITICAL m OF DWELLING �11 `C.^""°'"'" AREAS J? J +�/" f Lf�• SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT O STORIES �: UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED O YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D t7 o •7' /' I m VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE f r HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING ll� «� L+ PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO MECHANICAL t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE J GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. ( /f�,./ STAGE e3l7RCHARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS — a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS N FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS• INSPECTION FEE W j IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING f EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE a ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE G DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANYCITY ORDINANCE J PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPT-_., ,.., ._ / E +�� i S NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RECE P--•- r- r �'•J ''� J y I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. ana IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNATURE (OWNER O AGE DATE SIGNED (425) 1. OFFICIAL& riRT t} DATE f� 771-0220 RELEASE 6Y r DATE' ATTENTION EXTj333 r f pc. r; t f' IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 ` f + %• d " ,, _.. - .r r; , �,.+ .c%' , w.., A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL• FILE YELLow- INSPECTOR FAX PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 5/98 E RE EIVED lip r e�f HERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER, I CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAAE/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. Uj FMAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $ z TESCP Approved 0 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP W Permit Required 0 x(/ II 0— Street Use Permit Req'd 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING — PROPOSED Inspection Requited 13 Sidewalk Required 0 REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Underground j 4", Wiring required 0 NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 No 0 ADDRESS REMARKS W z U OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE CITY ZIP TELEPHONE it NAME ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATES cc ADDRESS 0 FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE z1xe1TY ZIP TELEPHONE 0 U �-:, )1�. , . 7 , '. "? I I- 'k I/ - ,, � , - . , o") L"/ o LL STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND R EO'D POSTED 0 YES 0 NO -Ak- / I it" SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TXX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED W , , _j 5 EXP COVERAGE LOT REQUIRED SED PROPO(FT.) F-1 NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING/ MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDESETBACKS REAR(FT,) FRONT L/RSIDESETBACKS REAR ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL o COMPLIANCE OR z CHANGE OF USE z PARKING LOT PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ REQ'D IL IL SIGN PROVIDED I I ❑ REPAIR❑ GRADING FENCE ❑ REMARKS CYDS ( _X FT) [3' DEMOLISH 0 TANK ❑ OTHER Z o GARAGE CARPORT ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL 0 ROC KERY F- (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CL "102 .,el / " CHECKED BY TiFE,61`,,CONSTRUCTION 'P.01DE OCCUPANT i 11j'f,�! f)"i � 1.:I GROUP o In NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTOR OCCUPANT o JAREA UNITS STORIES NUMBERI"j' LOAD REQUIRED 0 YES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBP 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 'CA rn, I )ell 4— S.-'e VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING PLAN VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE LU PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a. PERMIT LIMIT., 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION E NG C4 "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE INSPECTION U) IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF L AN LAN DSCA RI DS, 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND I N SP EQ ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY INSPEQTIQN.FEE FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE RECEIPT PLAN C PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT INANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." MI IRECEIPT TOTAL A TOTAL AMOUNT DUE :x I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not a permit until signed by the CALL TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. ct(�d IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIALS SIGNATUREf DATE SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT)') DATE SIGNED if (425) L�j 771-0220 I RELEASED BY DATE ATTENTION EXT�333 `IS ITUNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_ ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW- INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 5198 �, ;�• r.E RECEIVED ..PERMIT �•r=fr'�/•.,.; I�J� '' .. EXPIRES �1:,' +' CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT !: a ZONE ki", .' NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS rr u'r 2.t 1, i t:'r: `i+' : ,'J. l,('t --OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ' PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. �' •'/ k!'� r L'" �' `' i "' '' LID FEE $ l 7tG•ADDRESS U Z f�� ! t S- (0, 41 I Union �• 1,.:i` i?.'�; 1� r •J I..( .�. C�5523 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW PQ approved Q RW Permit Requ6etl O EXISTING ? '� Street Use Permit Req'd CL. Inspection Required CITY JJ 11 ZIP TELEPHONE PROPOSED ry ®N Sidewalk Required'�F;..,".Q REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground il Wiring required NAME METEP SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PR,VREQUIRED ,`.7:..%11: l,_ 'd E..,1 .1 ..�. �,.: ;:i j Ey z\.� s� :,..'1: 4. i • _I_ d-.:-.: C: � l.! L .. a. f ;.,r l: YES L' , NO ❑ '* Q W I- ADDRESS REMARKS z z _ r, .. 603 It ,wa ti: to LtE?' lYy 1 OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE z z a .� r i'l t011. ` ../7'+��C CITY ZIP TELEPHONE r J"Lu'1+I' 7?,/Jett ••� d,7��! ✓/M.l .�r �' A'i1 /, !P✓'�* JJl > e yy ++ S f:.'. i . t. �...i ;.'. i:r i. �. _f i;s I !.,` I y .�. �� I;) •_- tit' �� "i - .1 u D !. J . , . y •.. d r:.::W.- sS.,u':l}G .k:.: t. r ,i!,r.•'r �t ... m`f' •.d"v"'l ' :.%i . _ f""+' d e �, NAME ! I: luc.a•...k., rk. f`J� 0 a° , ._..^� f� `�; :rr,': ;,t, k /•c;. :r+ 1. / ✓r',�r,ry, r t• ,>,N'}J ft ENGINE RING y M � w/ P rp SI REVIEWEI �JDATE 9 Z} (f �.II 1 ADDRESS .C,r'� 7433 F lLf-th av,T a uc' Sou ti't ` FI CC 2 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE �. E �iEVIEWfA 8Y�1 DATE % W CC LL U 7 e c1. l.. L l v it L A � A `tl a 2 17 /VARIANCE OR CU , SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTIONIPBOND RE 'DOST£D ES ❑ NO STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRAT _ [/\pL ON A .k� l/ J •, r�V4''.".. . ppL.� '!� ' ,.r•'•�ji•"+'�./,.',• "g. - l SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. f rJ 4 — 0 0.1 — 0 C 3 fl) 0 0 -" ,r `i ;`t f:.- li it i - U12 U %) iJ 0 `i k�';;• I w,. .o,� � r�. +� '�� ,41 EXP r A I NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PRpOPOSED 99 '4r +L' It REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR t7 Z ❑ ADDITION COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR ❑ I p''� , G �^'^ ,yy, ••'f G " (r' z ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT CHANGE OF USE ❑ SIGN PARKING FO'D PROVIDED •r"'J LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE. �^ „ I II I �Tj. ��j�dJl e FENCE (ir4+`,�4 ��a y ❑ REPAIR ,Ip A CYDS ❑ ( X FT) .! R MARKS ❑ DEMOLISH Cl TANK ❑ OTHER c i 5 r, � 1 ti•- o (� GARAGE a CARPORT ❑ RETAININROCKE rG WALL ❑ RENEWAL fE r aP J '+ �./ � I • • y- ,}y rs - /i � .�t� /t,}V C H (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: '' " .wd U, ��, y..-; , �•r �, CHECKED BY P I r{: TYPE O C NSTRUCTION I COR OCCUPANT GROUP,J"�i to w oat, NUMBER OFL NUMBER OF DWELLING ./ CRITICAL w w AREAS �1• -" I�I '••; du,c/•'I'wr' ,f a / , , ) SPECIAL INSPECTOR OCCUPANT m to y,� STORIES 1 Y E UNITS I NUMBER JAREA REQUIRED DYES LOAD R (�y lk DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE cons true"l,.iorl of ii tLs t c, r e F fi:F1J..`.e REMARKS z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION. RECI'D o iota i l i i. vvl-1 with <a vi of I.1,d e r. y s .:r u ry Q1 a . �+ A � C: i L�,i.6t,�;.s )1 iJ.' ?Y;' ��.;.:. I. //- a•� % �"� • '!hhL'l%C.�C<..,. (,%" VALUATION FEE %�('�"1 '�, ji%'J u+•- IJ� r�r�jfC�,r,'1?4 rF :.''' C - ` F ..' .."� .. r�/ '; PLAN CHECK FEE I rr . . HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % r-. BUILDING + I... f �1_..•• r•w j i PLAN CHECK NO'„ VESTED DATE PLUMBING r° 7/5 MECHANICAL ' ( ' '^ 'O"t r' THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC "� "" d t DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE. GRADING/FILL to/ � SEPARATE PERMISSION., r• i CC STATE SURCHARGE r "f g"".� i PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 18Q DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION I a .., W��Ga��(� rt5• /,�. ..ww..• •. " •• W " "APPLICANT -ON BEHALF OF HI9'OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS', ASSIGNS AND,$UCCESOR5,d .. t IW5PE rTION"FE.'5 ", -•r' flr,; -py-,r-•.- •••-�• - • r i IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND LANDSCAPINGIx {� INSPECTION FEE ( jI1� .'.R 9 9 j' ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER. NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT = c FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENTOFANY CITY ORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT , / .+ 6 ,o/ 4/ / --- O NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RE FIPT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ! I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I'HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION'' receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. , ° OFFICIA S SIGNA;V (r. i DATE 1P• I C J f t i SIGNATURE (OWNER O� -GE f- -- _ DATE SIGNED / `� . E L- 6 ✓ .C,." 771-0220 R LASED-8y, rr DATE ATTENTION EXT 333 r IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 77 i 1 �0221 r' A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 5/98 vi t (A- rIV14/015 Otficc J��r'1J1J1"�^• ��I n,,(( ��gg��,/� %� j r•lj /}� DATE RECEIVED v t 1 ` `.J`. �l•�i • Z� � O, PERMIT EXPIRESUSE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBE&:2 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUeE(APTq ADDRESS ADDRESS )kefl I J (�� OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ' f_ LS j &2az - ( PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. cc W MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $ 3 ZAL HW PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved p RW Permit Required D O f Street Use Permit Req'd o CITY �t ZIP TE EPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED inspection Required 0 /jA I� Sndergr Required 0 n ) J V' I �f r .� REQUIRED DEDICATION FT ground l� ''y) ,� J Wiring required Whin N E METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED 1 YES ❑ NO O s r w ADDRESS REMARKS Z = i ,- OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE O Q w CITY ZIP Vill TELEPHONE 120&--V��yp__- NAME ie azlzg�e `ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE IX ADDRESS U` Z F D Y .. DAT q� w LL CITY ZIP' TELEPHONE STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY, VARIA OR CU ORELINE OR:ADBN INSPECTION BONA REO'D POSTED ,� Pm I O YES NO SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT a J P OPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. , �rq-g-c�1-o2��az1Z � �� ail -vzo�-�5 COMPLETE" EXEMPT'' ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED h EXP:�-- NEW RESIDENTIAL pL�iblBl}rQy MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED' PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FL) -: ', FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR % C7 ❑ ADDITION I .❑ XI COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR ' " i j�"PARKING1,11 ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT CHANGE OF USE,,_,n ❑ SIGN REO'D I.PROVIDED OT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE a ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ FENCE x„ PTj E FkKS N Ike ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER - GARAGE ❑ CARPORT ❑ RETROCAINING WALL, ❑ RENEWAL Z O KER a (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN - /y CHECKED BY OCCUPANT t�> v ITYPEO GROUP w NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL — OF +- DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECIoF" 'AREA OCCUPANT OSTORIES UNITS NUMBER . REQUIRED a YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS ":' 0 PROGRESS:'INSPECTIONS.PER UBC:.108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D c 73 { VALUATION FEE r PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE is e5 GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % !BUILDINGy PLAN CHECK NO: — VESTED DATE PLUMBING CSC MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 2 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE F• SEPARATE PERMISSION. g STATESURC�HARGE 4. ILL!Ix PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR • PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS R VI W FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS TION FEE w IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE cr Q ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE OEEMEDTOMODIFY, WAIVE ORREDUCE ANY REQUIREM ENT OFANY CITY ORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPTZ r `/] rry \j►yl` `0[ = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEIP TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION: AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENS ANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIG A RE (bWNE r DATE SIGNED (425) OFF AT DATE 'S O� - 771-0220 RE ED BY DATE ENTIO EXT 1333 ITIS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- If OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL •FILE YELLOW •INSPECTOR FAX PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR s/98 ATE RECEIVED LIT PERMIT EXPIRES q CITY OF EDMONDS 'USE ZONE PERMIT ``'��}� L:'I NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS I N ^ V OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS � A / 1 { 1 V PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. ¢ MAILING ADDRESS w LID FEE $ �.�^� V \ �� \Q� S� �V � TESCP Approved Q PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP eUse 0 SRW treet Pergmit Req d Q CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required O \G� C+Q'��j,J� S��C' `O ` Sidewalk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground Wiring required 0 NAME —METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED _ �,.+ 1 {V,..,. s tf\V V YES O NO \ l-l�.� w �_- ADDRESS i T O-1 �v,TC REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOfi" IESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE Z z Z w CITY ZIP TELEPHONE `tA� L_ WA \O Znb b Z`; -3 2.\ O NAME /' ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE 4_ ADDRESS At�1 ¢0 IS ¢ FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE ¢ CITY ZIP ' TELEPHONE Z o O��vVVltlti �/( ZS ��—�y4 VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBk INSPECTION REO'D BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATIO DATE CC CW 1.YES N E�"T � 1 Q `Q � NO SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED EXP I I ❑ NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR ❑ OR ADDITION COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE i OF USE CHANGE OF USE Z PARKING REO'D I PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN S a ENCE X FT) REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS REMARKS (❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ](I EFL i', GARAGE RETAINING WALL /T ❑ CARPORT ROCKERY❑ ❑ RENEWAL O i (TYPE OF USE,, BUSINESS ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKED BY T E,OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCC U T • � �OR GAO NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICALa w OF .tom AREAS/� 1 v �` R AREA OOCA U ANT O STORIES UNITSDWEL NUMBER REQUIRED O YESSPECIAL DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS 2 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D o to �^ ti P"T' rn? �Q,jv L,w��ivr VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING ... PLAN CHECK VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 2 GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. ... i ¢ SURCHARGE W PERMIT APPLICATION: 100 DAYS o PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE w IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT o DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE i NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' RECEIPT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM'THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION: AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR -CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR, INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. S NATURE (OWN GEN DATE SIGNED (425) OF IALS SIGNATUR DATE ' r 771 -0220 RELEAY DATES/ a NTION EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL. FILE • YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK. OWNER • GOLD • ASSESSOR �/(\ s/98. DATE RECEIVED Ld PERMIT EXPIRES I CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE bc NUMBE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITH/APT# ADDRESS n �t/i7 vc SOVT� 10 Q 3 OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION N0. LOT NO. LID NO. LI EE'$ ALGAL /�!lrE/QP/Q s� S O MAILING ADDRESS G /�T/It t/E PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP �� EXISTING PROPOSED ---- REQUIRED DEDICATIOr� FT p ppa� R� Street Use Permit Roca irmpection Required Skimalk Required 0 �" '� 0 CITY ZIP SNO46i.xNE (� 9 17.7 TELEPHONE 11615 — 77jy� �C/ NAME ��(1/ L(/yCf/ ��! /�v�� FyG77 1 �vr6?A1WTSo N l METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 13 NO O Z 1G C v ADDRESS Ia3 5'ecomy VVC Sotrr7 REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z U CITY ZIP TELEPHONE AAamoS wA aao as- 9,9/-/0/3 C I; OU7- 7-0 3ZE). $ 5 ,_^� •.. ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY ATE r u ADDRESS FIRE , REVIEWED BY f:,; DATE � CITY ZIP WNE ARI CE OR CU •�"� SHORELINE OR ADBN+ INSPECTION S ONO BOND POSTEDEaD $ /� BEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA; V ALLOWED '' PROPOSED NRi HEIGHT ,,ALLOWED PROPOSED NtG PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. Ll$y -00/', 3- y5y-cb1-020-o0S Z ❑ NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ® PLUMBING/MECH ADDITION , ; 1 COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ ®.,-... _ ._. .-:0 CHANGE OF, USE .., REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN ❑ ❑ REPAIR .. ' CYD3 ❑ FENCE ❑ GRADING �' ( X Fr) OTHER ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY .-..•.; ❑ FIRE ALARM,, LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED : Nc. ^,. REQUIRED SETBACKS (FL), FRONT SIDE REAR . ' - NL t - ;;PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FROM L/R SIDE REAR :..; +� tN�i t7 z PARKING - REO'D PROVIDED IN LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWEp BY DATE I �jf'E REMARKS io Mhi A 4 /tfYr,fr i1Pt� �� (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN Of-F CHECKED BY TYPE F'CO T TION ;�� C S OCCUPANT GROUP r O � NUMBER OF STORIES a NUMBER OF DWELLING . / Q UNITS ' . ,v/" ' CRffICAL AREAS . { n NUMBER r/�f SPECIAL INSP CTION REQUIRE° YES AREA ,yZg�.- f. OCCUPANT LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS` INSPECTIONS PER USC` 08/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 9 TENANT TMP ov n1i , s b. out ded s Buz I- xN r jq_o*Lso&g U c ..W. PE o �c A y6w tw mese - GG,, • � O' 5eir DYt_ SoK .. S�C. 0 - d ." Descriptlon- .,,"_FEE Description FEE '� 3 Plan Check State Surcharge D HEATS CE ��jtBuilding,Permit GLAZIN % "' „ 4 jLOTx6l0 ) rt t City Surcharge e PLAN CHECK O: r VESTED DATE V. � :Plumb � Mechanical It 7 tt THIS PERYR AUTHORIZI ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMITAPPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION fJ Grading Engr. Review Engr. Inspection 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. DepoSit ... IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection ' Receipt # Q ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE 9 LandSCB a Ins DEEMED TO MODIFY, WANE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE P P• Total Amt. Due = NOR LIMIT W ANY WAY THE CITY'8 ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Recording Fee Receipt # HERE13Y ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE . CORRECT, AND THAT I AM OWNER, ORD THIS EAPPLICATION; O IVEN ISETHE YTAUTHORIZED AGENTHAT THE ON GOF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged in space provided. WO EN'S COMPENSATION INSURANC AND RCW 18.27. 81 RE (OWNER R GE DATE GNED (425) NAT \ TE V )r 771-0220 R ED BY ATE ATTENT104 Off 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL i A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER • GOLD -ASSESSOR 04�02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN -ACCOUNTING U e.....r I`I PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS i w P flc')4.,w MAILING ADDRESS S V 1O O 1 l�i-I� I D ►, S f CITY ZIP Se_01I_ e IwP` Ig/01 NAME ADDRESS ZIP TELEPHONE ty.2..S 6 9 6 - Sl-U 0 j .. NAME _ I CBL q ADDRESS FILI CA -f S . CITY ZIP TELEPHONE •�e�` W� 9�13� boo Y11 -7.yy(0 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHEC P wiijC VS07-3-0-si &L" PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. K S �-( 8-- op y• ;0 2 3- 0 0 0 �- y zc 'EW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ❑ii ADDITION ��^^yy.OMMERCIAL PIC COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL (❑ MULTIFAMILY �IGN ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ FENCE X ( ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER GARAGE ❑ WALL ❑ F RE SPRINKLER ❑ CARPORT ROCKERYG FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: GE NUMBER OF �" NUMBER OF DWELLING /' CRITICAL AREAS STORIES UNITS / NUMBER /l% DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE L, k 1 Pf f © V,�- USE PERMIT ZONE e26 NUMBER�� JOB a V-c SUITE/APTB ADDRESS /Z' 3 't PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP T SCP Approved RW Permh Required Street Use Permit Raga EXISTING PROPOSED hapeelbn Required Q Sidewalk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION FT llnderWound Winne required G METER SIZE LINE NO. RV REQUIRED rSIZE I IF,FI9zIbRES YES RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY D TE 30 02 FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE to I` VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB11 INSPECTION BOND REQ'D ONO POSTED 1.►ir� ES $ SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE' EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWEDALLfOWWED PROPOSED i '^^�" 1 ,. �( � EXP . T LOT CO GE t UIRED, BA ,KS (Fj�r ` ',RE�kR�.... R©PQ '' P( ETBACKS (Fr.) ALLO ED P S D • •- RC3NT 51 E' q' R SIDE REAR v N z Z PAR ING LOT AREA PUORWE B DATE REO'D PROVIDED tee°'®' I v 4 FT) I REMARKS CHECKED BY TYPE O)JRUCjION CO OCCUPANT GROUP SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED YES LOAD REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REG'D 9 m VALUATION Description Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge LAZ HEAT SOURCE r___6ING % LOT SLOPE % ..,.,,o Building Permit e City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: n VESTED DATE Plumbing Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC a Grading DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. It Engr. Review ul PERMITAPPLICATION: 180 DAYS d PERMIT LIMIT- 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY,, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE 9 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Val Amt. Due = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. - Recording Fee Receipt N G VENEBIS CO RECTACKNOWLEAND THAT. 1 AM THEDGE THAT I HAVE READ HIS ER, OR APPLICATION; DU Y AUTHOR Z DT THE FAGENTION OF A 100— LICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL Thl p ic...n is not a rmit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Buildin cial or his/her D trty: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION re iptIsacknoerle gedInspace p ded. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNATURE (OWNER OR t4GENT) w DATE SIGNED OFFI If Q GNATURE DAT 7 G _ 2 vJ J J • • ■ -0220 ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL R AS BY ATE E�T 1333 � / t'G, /j/I/,yam �l A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CFRTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPEC O ,. 04/02 ,L/i/�Q,i/✓cS�-' PINK - OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR PRESS HARD -YOU AR MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN -ACCOUNTING CITY OF EDMONDS uat PERMIT . ZONE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION, PERMIT APPLICATION ,DB SUITE,APTa ADDRESS % + — OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS L LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK ' SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO MAILING ADDRESS -�f' GLt- PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved RW Permit Required ❑ ❑ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER bozo +r�' 7{/ EXISTING REOUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ l/�JG✓-•6 PROPOSED PROPOSED Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ ❑ to NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ w a ; ADDRESS REMARKS ? w CI ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Z z w NAME /\l A47�v ':'. ADD SS C :•.:�'r �� ' ENGINEERING MEMO DATeQG;' REVIEWED BY U-.,- ll .. CITY ZIP '+ TELEPfONE N-AMBER r¢a Z �J� 't- .,' .. 1' i' FIRE MEMO DATED <- .;-.•. REVIEWED BY O .,:-:. cc a O STATE LICENSE NUMBER .. EXPIgATION OATS ter' v ""� SIGN AREA SERA REVIEW ADB N0. 1 / Legal Description o.f PropekV;x- include all`easementS ' ALLOWED PROPOSED- COMPLETE EXEMP _ ZO 2/J ( s, �J� . 1 SHO E NEM / i f I• ,S.�i � Z r< 2 VARIANC � EVIEW BY DA E G N /3 a 'f �i(�%%} K 7 , T ifii`JIG CO.V,£RA E ? z u, J Properly: � - [P.Yi-�:.;B�'. z 7, E AEA'R Q Tax Account Parcel No. NEW ElrRESIDENTIAL• ING s ADDITION COMMERCIAL 4 REMODEL ` GN ING -NCE KED E.OF CONSTRUCT IO CODE OCCUPANT GROUP REPAIR x+-- — DEMOLISH rci E .SWIM POOL:,. - HOT TUB/$PA J AL - - IRED - AREA OCCUPANT LOAD.y GARAGE ALL/ - .. - - RL E& R CARPORT _ e SS1NSPECTI6NS'PER>UBC-.305 Z (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS CWWVITYI'EXPLAIN: "' 0 J W NUMBER NUMBER'OF _ - CRIT�I>a' ti'"' • - O m OF DWELLING;'. STORIES, UNITS`- AREA NUMr�✓'�» - - DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOt PLAN) (L.J +INAL:.INSPECTIOWOEOUIRED VALUATION FEE ,PLAN CHECK FEI:. Q a ' :BUILDING'; .; _, , HEAT SOURCE: - GLAZING PLUMBING Plan Check No. _ MECHANICAL %RADINGIFILL This Permit covers work to be done on private'property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE (n successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold W harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, f employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of a x whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT D� omodify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES signed by the Building Official or his/her ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of the §Ke of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insuranc R S.Z7. • INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. Sit NAT RE tOWNER GEN DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT nn CITY OF OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE ' EDMONDS CALL FOR RELEASED BY: DATE ATTENTION INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771 0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC r.W&PTGR 1 PINK — n/wnP.r GOLD -- Assessor CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS MAI ING ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER t NAME N U5t r` ZONE JOB ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER r PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION onnoncon ___ METER SIZE LINE SIZE I NO. OF FIXTUF SUITE. APT a TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required ❑ Sidewalk Required ❑ 6 w PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ 3 Z NAME ` —++�• • T1 IPW IFF —W I y • ADDRESS . •''. 1 1 „.`_U ,,;'+'a l) V ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY CITY ZIP J. Il � i 4_�h l: 6070 i f TELEPHONE NUMBER 7 a- ;,} �-j •7C {J FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY Lu LL STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE It --I � A y � t �c �^^ � � ( ��.. G.BV IVL 1 1 SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP ADS NO. y" « SHOR Y p Legal Description of Property -include all easements �j t;L17 ( 6 1 r VARIANCE OR Cu N"NREVIEW BY � �D T LO / - SETBACKS —FEE HEIGHT FRONT REAR LOT COVERAGE ? J n Property } f) ; ` +? ('i (" �? Tax Account aF"i G Parcel No... ¢ �"+ 1�tJ t Q "�'W.-�> � c3 REMARKS a r_2 E-W RESIDENTIAL El PLUMBING ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANIC REMODEL APT. BLDG. El SIG REPAIR ❑ GRADING ❑ FEN DEMOLISH ❑ NOORDSTOVE HOT B SPA ElGARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE;"BUSI�NESS O�R/ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ICODE - - OCCUPANT GR q SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED YES AREA OCCUPANT LOAD.. REMARKS Q PROGR INSPECTIONS PER. UBC 305 Q cc NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE OONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTIO E A �y {� PLAN CHECK FEE VA AT N BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: i GLAZING p/O PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days . "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE y successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold - w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, s employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance ° nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. 1 agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES signed by the Building Official or his/her ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• acknowledged in space provided. tion Insuranag,�and RCW 18.2 . INSPECTION SI ATi1RE IOWNER`QR AGHNTI � DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT NATURE DATE ,/r �p �/% ry t "1 l CITY OF EDMONDS,V t CALL FOR ELEAS F,DATE ATTENTION INSPECTIONIT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A .BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771 oAAo 1 11 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD —Assessor i I DN ! r", DUMPSTER 1 EQUIPMENT STORAGE ROOM �• ECCLEANING I ill f 1 I ROOM } E7, HAc =i Q IIE CONFERENCE BREAK ROOM f i �I s�t x • t'I-; a i i f .I I..• �'- I 't. HALLWAY STORAGE is HALL WOMEN - ltt EN y Ar� 'iHALLWAY;i M f .• STAIR #2 } ---- r i Est= SUITE No: 101 e X JANITOR "d-": ACFEA TOUR CONSULTANTS OFFICES r �r 1639 SO. FT. :. WAY s SUITE No: 100 FUTURE TENANT SPACE _ LOBBY E •; M ft RAMP DOWN TO GARAGE I I ti° •."`�� ^•'_�•." i�' it-.,,.. L_-- _... ........---:L.�...� ._ .._..._ PROPOSED EMERGENCY EXIT SUBMITTED UNDER PLAN CHECK NUMBER 03-508 AND UNDER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEER SEE PERFERED DETAIL ALTERNA 1 AND ALTERNATIVE 2 ON THIS SHEET EXISTING SIDEWALK � ■I '—NEW EXIT STAIR AND LANDING \--EXISTING PLANTER ,PERFERED ALTERNATIVE 1 ENLARGED PARTIAL PLAN AT SUITE 100 EXTERIOR EXIT 1/8" = 1-0' APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING ArT-ft,-- INTERNAL STAIRWAY AND LA 11 IF THIS ALTERNATIVE IS U D STRUCTURAL MODIFlCATIO TO EXISTING STRUCTURE AN DETAILED DRAWINGS WI BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF TENANTINPROVEMNET PROJECT PLAN CHECK NUMBER 03-508 c I I° io I a �I_ SIDEWALK —NEW EXIT LANDING PAD _.._-.. EXISTING PLANTER . . PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR BUILDOUT 1 /16-=1'-0' t T ALTERNATIVE 2 E e' -�iGo D PARTIAL PLAN AT SUITE 100 EXTERIOR EXIT STREET FILE p• JECT DESCRIP11UN: �4 a — NOV 2 0 2003 PACIFIC " P.O. Box 1599 pEVF.OPMENT SERVIV INTERNATIONAL Edmonds, WA 98020 r ENGINEERINGPLL� FaxPhon(425)5744-140000 �� DATE: 11 /19/2003 PROJECT No.: DATUM: SHEET 3 of 6 v.o m-La a 4-• CITY COPY GAV 97 UBC APPROVED AS NOTED L-7L E C. - LZ li V 'i-E D BY ENGINEERING i :r z Da-ta: al DEVELOPMENT SERMES CTR, . CITY OF EDMONDS II • CITY OF EDMONDS III -DING DEPARTMENT WALIM& OWNER- �APPROVED DATFR BLDG. OFFICIAL PERM& NUMBER 71y"F112"AW&I 10 1 r U/7-2 7121, wi,=W BENCH MARK "C" SET CHISELED SOUARE AT TOP CURB ELEVATION = 22.01 yk �19 SDMH RIM 22.91 IE 18.1 (8" N.W.) f IE 17.8 12"C. N.E.) f IE 18.3 8" S.E.) ` IE 18.5 12" S.W.) 45 IE 17.9 12"C S.W. SSMH RIM 21.50 IE 12.8 8" N& S.E.) \, E 12.1 �12".W. C THRU S.W. & N.E.)?l?� �r SDMH RIM 21.58 �r IE 7.7 (21"C. N.W., 18"C. N.E., K AND 24"C. S.W.) / iry Gi LL W � / 1919 4-- 0 U z O>m �� N = c) N =c) ono z O 0 �- o IZ :2 C. o o C, O� O . ry , � N - x CI7 t- O W LLJ 4- U: \2000212\xsur.dwg / SSMH r RIM 31.89 / IE 21.64 (12"C THRU S.W. & N.E.) / SDMH RIM 31.94 / IE 24.8 (12"C S W.) IE 25.6 (12"C. .E•) \�S IE 24.8 12"C N.E. \ `r A \IN, Z N', t \ FFIRD 1 I.P. �kA\ :;;:> / :�.<' •.a�• pP .:. \ \ / \ \ � UTILITY k> �y 26��; 19 \ POLE / a oo� `� ya 0 ' ANCHOR " <ry UTILITY \ g 41 \ <` " O`� /\\ 6 7` \ O ssco 01. 0 5z) `: ` N \ \ y as t y S6 20 / CB �, • '21 RIM 36.04 y r O IE 30.8 (6"PVC SE) PARCEL BBLOCK 2 GEPHAR Jj 'S I ST ADDITION It SDMH WITH OVERFL04F' RIM 36.67 \ \ `' dy TOP OVERFLOW = 34.7 TOT�q DMOND� \ ' \ \ IE31.7(30"CMP N.) 11� �, r� WATER 3 BOLLARDS J .. METER 9�D o () yo• \V�� 0) �p 2� 9 sF c y$� ok A, Up? 40pFRry) 0( X \ \ \ �Vk �k BEIJCH MARK ..A. ELEVATION = 35.46 of J-BOX i Q4 \ \ y ti990 3'tASH tb 0 HIGH ALL�� \\ _a^wP ENCLOSURE �790 y;L\'GARAGE CUNEPY k9x CANOPY LINE/PARCEL A , CV 5k•`1•` RIM 34.22 O IE 29.7(12"CMP NE & 12"CMP SW) k• w �/j 1 �•.7 IE 29.7 6"P SE CB 4' ' ; . "'� ,' : ROp F OF 4 IE 29.7(4"P SE) RIM 23.61 ZA ba�Ca�.:. Rai ,% 00 U <� IE 21.8(8" SW) I .ys• a p� COy� �� OO A 3 C CO 6" CONCRETE WALL .00 �1% ROoNk R / cas a 2° WITH 3' BOARD FENCE FRS OF S METER Up STOP SIGN p... _ �, • i 00 O l/,yF : �T0 9y SIGN °�O �• " % V OQ p -yJ- & STRE T j k2 �j0 �' s L6' �O• II 1t 0��'�vh/ �Q J t PARKNG rya 'atiA• .. Q�!MSN' �.:� x �N ' �O q k i2 • ° 29 � � o '// 0 \ Nj0 2112 w p h } 7S0 rx, a1 O0,D CANPY C' 7' C I N S OR } �- spy 00RNF� PO ET TO q� l r ,� .� • �, : •9py ND FR i x y2, o \ y ANCH CB RIM 30.62 3 HOUR ;;_ - t' IE 26.4 (12"C. S.W. 2aPARKING .'. �� & 12" S.E.) oa \ \ �y 0 VAULT CB VAULTELE. \ 29. RIM 30.7 IE 26.3 12"C N.E.) 90 IE 27.2 6"P. N.E.) CB IE 27.2 12"C. S.E.) RIM 29.03 BENCH MARK "B" CHISELED SQUARE AT TOP OF CURB ELEVATION = 29.83 2 SSMH RIM 39.36 IE 25.76 (8"NW & 8"SE) IE 26.16 (8" SW) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 1 hch = 20 ft. OCA- 15) c-,�../ 4Cv // X/61 SITE rigNICINITY MAP - NO SCALE DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: LOTS 23 AND 24 IN BLOCK 1 OF PLAT OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME• 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LOTS 17 THROUGH 22 INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 1 OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE NORTHEASTERLY 16 FEET OF SAID LOT 17, CONVEYED TO THE TOWN OF EDMONDS FOR PUBLIC ALLEY BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 88 OF DEEDS., PAGE 217. HORIZONTAL DATUM: BASED ON CENTERLINE OF 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, WHICH BEARS N 29'00'00" E ACCORDING TO RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7610250106. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED, AS FOUND ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9407205005. NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRANSFORMER PAD UNDER NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELEVATED PORTION OF BUILDING. ELEVATION = 40.20' SEE DRAWING FOR BENCH MARKS SET FOR SITE USE. AREA: SITE CONTAINS 17,056 SQUARE FEET OR 0.392 ACRES. LEGEND: C CONCRETE PIPE CB CATCH BASIN CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE E ELECTRICAL LINE G GAS MAIN IE INVERT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD LINE SD STORM DRAIN LINE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SS SANITARY SEWER LINE SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T TELEPHONE LINE UG UNDERGROUND LINE (R) RECORD DATA EDMONDS UTILITY PROVIDERS ELECTRICITY SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT 2320 CALIFORNIA STREET EVERETT, WA. 98201 (425) 783-8300 TELEPHONE GTE BUSINESS OFFICE 1800 41ST STREET EVERETT, WA. 98206 (800) 483-5100 NATURAL GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY 1700 E. COLLEGE WAY MOUNT VERNON, WA. 98273 (888) 225-5773 (#3) SEWER, WATER AND STORM CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA. 98020 (425) 775-2525 _. ZONING CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 121 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA. 98020 (425) 771-0220 SITE IS ZONED "BC" ( COMMUNITY BUSINESS - 2000 ) SUBSTRUCTURES: BURIED UTILITIES .ARE SHOWN AS INDICATED ON RECORD MAPS FURNISHED BY OTHERS AND VERIFIED WHERE POSSIBLE BY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE FIELD. WE ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THOSE RECORDS. FOR THE FINAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IN AREAS CRITICAL TO DESIGN CONTACT THE UTILITY / AGENCY. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GTIR CITY OF EDIAONDS S.E. 1 /4, SEC. 232 T. 27 N., R. 3 E,, W.M. 0 '4 I Nc Cal `CGS# x 0 O�0 c1Y 'ucA z s d• 00 In M 1-0to0 -0-U Nv)CNV) a Lli to af 30 (o Uc1 we 0000 N�Nz v I ) T x _I o LL-Q Z J W U) Li w a Z Lv O Lu V Z Q LLJ � o 0 17 w J z�L0 (n U rn o O¢ m G o�w0) 00 0 I I \ N N N O) O 0) -- FF-- O Z F= J J <n Q 0 o a lil ltl Q fn O >- w LQL:l pw 0 Q � O Z Q m J wow w Ld x � a 0 Z OO z z Z tJ _ V) w J ry m W U m _ LL i n II n r o V) o �- Z 0 0 O L,J o W a -9 a I -la GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, CITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2000 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION - (WSDOT) 2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CONSTRUCTION TO INCLUDE CLEARING/LOGGING OR GRADING THE SITE/LOT CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE LOCATED AND FIELD IDENTIFIED. 3. ALL WORK WITHIN HE RIGHT-OF-WAY SITE AND CITY RIGHT OF WAY R.O.W. SHALL BE:SUBJECT T TO THE INSPECTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR OR A DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT (425) 771-0220 ext 1325 TO SCHEDULE A PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. FIELD CHANGES (REVISIONS) WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERED AS-BUILTS BE SUPPLIED PRIOR TO SITE APPROVAL. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SATISFACTORILY MAINTAIN THESE FACILITIES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. TRENCH BACKFILL OF NEW UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE PERCENTAGE OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (MODIFIED PROCTOR) AS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE PROPERLY BEDDED AND THE TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE CONTROL DENSITY FILL (2 SACK MIX). 6. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS, OR CLEARING LIMITS MAY RESULT IN VIOLATIONS AND/OR REVOCATION OF PROJECT PERMITS, PLAN APPROVAL, AND BOND FORECLOSURES. STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STORM DRAINAGE (SD) PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP) WITH SMOOTH INTERIOR. CPEP SHALL BE ADS N-12 OR HANCOR HI-1 OR EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WHERE OTHER PIPE IS INDICATED, IT SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), ASTM C-14 (24" DIAMETER AND LARGER TO BE REINFORCED ASTM C-76), OR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP). CMP TO BE GALVANIZED STEEL WITH TREATMENT 1 ASPHALT COATING OR BETTER, ALL RCP AND CMP SHALL HAVE RUBBER GASKETS. MINIMUM COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PIPE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH, OR IF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION IS UNSATISFACTORY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL WITH A GRAVEL MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE PIPE. 3. PIPE BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE OR PIPE -ARCH IN LAYERS WITH A LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF 6", MAXIMUM DEPTH 8", THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER. THESE COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. MATERIALS TO COMPLETE THE FILL OVER PIPE SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND INDICATED IN THESE AND THE REFERENCED SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL GRATES (INLET AND CATCH BASIN) SHALL MATCH PAVEMENT/CURB ELEVATIONS AND SHALL BE VANED. 5. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL CONFORM TO WSDOT STANDARD TYPE 1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOLE, INLET, AND CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS AND PAVING. 7. ALL CATCH BASINS WITH A DEPTH OVER 5.0 FEET TO THE FLOW LINE SHALL BE A TYPE 2 CB. 8. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. 9. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL CATCH BASINS/MANHOLES EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN DEPTH. 10. CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE STANDARD CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATES AND SHALL BE OLYMPIC FOUNDRY OR APPROVED EQUAL 11. ALL STORM DRAIN WORK MUST BE STAKED FOR LINE AND GRADE PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 12. STORM DRAINAGE STUB OUTS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2X4 AND LABELED "STORM". LOCATIONS OF THESE INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE RECORD DRAWINGS AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. 13. STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE PIPE AND CATCH BASINS SHALL BE FLUSHED AND CLEANED PRIOR TO CITY OF EDMONDS ACCEPTANCE. 14. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK PERTAINING TO DRAINAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION. 15. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN. 16. ONE SET OF APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS SHALL BE ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR DRAINAGE INSPECTION. 17. NO PART OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE COVERED, CONCEALED, OR PUT INTO USE UNTIL IT HAS BEEN TESTED, INSPECTED, AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. 18. STENCIL STORM DRAIN GRATES WITH "DUMP NO WASTE, DRAINS TO STREAM". MAINTENANCE OF SILTATION BARRIERS 1. SILTATION BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH z RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. CLOSE ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO THE REPAIR OF DAMAGED m BALES, END RUNS AND UNDERCUTTING BENEATH BALES. NECESSARY REPAIRS TO BARRIERS OR REPLACEMENT OF BALES SHALL BE v ACCOMPLISHED PROMPTLY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED iL AFTER EACH RAINFALL. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE LEVEL OF o DEPOSITION REACHES APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE STRAW BALE BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO 0 CC) CONFORM TO THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. LO r] it d- 0 U p N � N co 0 o1�1 LO F- O Li.l UJ U: \2000212-01 \xcov.dwg S.E. 1 4 SEC. 23 TWP:� 27 N.) RGE. 3 E.t W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS T.E.S.C.P. NOTES .16 1. ESC; Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited` to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours,. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. 2. E jC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturbing actNities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two da s from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30�. 3. E'3C Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual. 5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate the effects of increased runoff shall be applied. 6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following: a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Tr,:mch dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tmcking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. SITE CRADING AND T.E.S.C.P. NOTES 1. ALL SITE WORK MUST COMPLY TO APPENDIX 33 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. (1997 EDITION). 2. THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION. 3. IF CUT AND FILL SLOPES EXCEED A MAXIMUM OF TWO FEET HORIZONTAL TO ONE FOOT VERTICAL, A ROCK OR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL MAY BE REQUIRED. ALL ROCK RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT ARE TO FOLLOW CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A CIVIL ENGINEER EXPERIENCED IN SOILS MECHANICS. 4. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR ALTERED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER TO ENSURE CONTINUING EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. 5. TEMPORARY SILTATION PONDS AND ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS SHALL 9E MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE OPERATIONAL, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 6. ALL DISTURBED LAND AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED AS REQUIRED BY THE CI FY OF EDMONDS. SEE SHEET C-2 7. WI :F POSSIBLE, NATURAL VEGETATION WILL BE MAINTAINED FOR SILT Cbill-ROL. 8. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. HYDROSEED PREFERRED. 9. THE PUBLIC ROW SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN. TRACKING OF MUD AND/OR DEBRIS FROM THE SITE WILL RESULT IN WORK STOPPAGE. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1. INSTALLATION: THE AREA OF THE ENTRANCE SHOULD BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. THE GRAVEL SHALL BE PLACED TO HE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS. ANY DRAINAGE FACILITIES REQUIRED BECAUSE, OF WASHING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLAN. IF WASH RACKS ARE USED, THEY SHOULD BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AGGREGATE: 4" TO 8" CRUSHED ROCK, QUARRY SPALL. 3. ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS: THE AGGREGATE LAYER MUST BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES THICK. IT MUST EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE MUST BE AT LEAST 50 FEET. HYDROSEED GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE: WILL BE SUBJECT TO A WELL - ESTABLISHED GROUND COVER WHICH FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRESPASS AND TRAMPLING BY ERECTING TEMPORARY FENCES, BARRIERS, SIGNS, AND THE LIKE AS REQUIRED. DO NOT WORK IN, OVER, OR ADJACENT TO SEEDED AREAS WITHOUT PROPER PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARDS. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT MOIST UNTIL WELL -ESTABLISHED, AND SHOWING A VIGOROUS, UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS. 3. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES WITHIN THE SITE, OR AFFECTED R.O.W., NOT OT`-iERWISE COVERED BY BUILDINGS, ASPHALT, GRAVEL, CONCRETE, MULCH, OR OTHER PLAN MATERIAL/LANDSCAPE ITEMS AS INDICATE-1) ON PLANS SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED. HYDROSEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS. INSTALL SEED, FERTILIZER, AND MULCH FOR HYDROSEED MIX AT THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION RATES: SEED: 4 POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. FERTILIZER: 12 POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. MULCH: 60 POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. JUTE OR EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL REGRADED SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2 1/2:1, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SLOPE IS SEEDED OR PLANTED. 4. PREPARATION OF SURFACE: ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DISCING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS. CITY OF EDMONDS T.E.S.C.P. NOTES (continued) 7. Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below. 8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses. 9. ESC Minimum Requirement - SedimentTrapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass through o sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Sediment ponds and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMPs intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to cn approved timetable. 10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC Requirement No. 2. 11. ESC Minimum Requirement - Controlling Off -Site Erosion. Properties and water ways downstream from development sites shall be protected from erosion due to increases in the volume, velocity, and peak flow rate of storm water runoff from the project site. 12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All temporary on -site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected velocity of flow from a two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition. Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems. 13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized. 15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall discharge into a sediment trap or sediment pond. 16. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on Construction Sites. All pollutants other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of storm water. 17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other appropriate financial instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan. [Ord. 3013 ? 1, 19951. EXCAVATION, GRADING, AND FILL 1. EXCAVATION, FILL, AND GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2000 WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, UBC APPENDIX 33, 1997 EDITION, AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. WCRK SHALL PROCEED TO THE FINISHED SURFACES AT THE ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS AND TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN. IF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND ANY CHANGES REQUIRED SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF RELATED CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT. 3. MATERIALS EXCAVATED IN AREAS REQUIRING CUT GRADING MAY BE USED AS FILL IF THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FILL MATERIAL OUTLINED BELOW. NO BOULDERS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT CHUNKS GREATER THAN 4" IN ITS LARGEST DIMENSION MAY BE USED. SUCH MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE. 4. AFTER CLEARING & GRUBBING IS COMPLETE, THE GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE PREPARED AS FOLLOWS: A. ALL AREAS TO BE SURFACED WITH PAVEMENT, CONCRETE, WALKS OR STEPS, AND BUILDING SLABS SHALL HAVE THE TOP 12" OF EXISTING SOILS STRIPPED AND RECOMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY DETERMINED BY ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). B. PRIOR TO RECOMPACTION OF THE STRIPPED MATERIAL ALL AREAS SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE OWNER'S CHOICE. ANY AREAS DEEMED UNSUITABLE BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL BE OVEREXCAVATED AND REPLACED WTH COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL AT AN AGREED UNIT PRICE BASED ON TRUCK MEASURE OF REPLACEMENT FILL. 5. IMPORTED FILL SHALL BE FREE -DRAINING GRANULAR MATERIAL WITHOUT ORGANICS, AND SHALL CONFORM TO WSDOT SECTION 9-03.10 FOR GRAVEL BASE, 9-03.14 FOR GRAVEL BORROW, OR ALTERNATE MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING PRIOR TO ITS USE. FILL SHALL HAVE NO MORE THAN 5% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE. 6. SUBMIT SAMPLES OF PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL FOR TESTING FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP PER ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR), PRIOR TO ANY FILLING OR OVEREXCAVATION AND REPLACEMENT. 7. PLACE FILL IN 10" THICK MAXIMUM LIFTS (LOOSE) AND COMPACT TO 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). 8. COMPACT ALL FILL USING SUITABLE COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. 9. ADD MOISTURE TO THE SOILS OR SCARIFY TO DRY SOILS AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOIL AND COMPACTION TESTING IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SOILS MAY ALSO BE TESTED BY OWNER. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP AND RE -COMPACT ALL SOILS NOT MEETING SPECIFIED COMPACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 13. FOR PLACEMENT OF BALLAST, GRAVEL BASE, AND/OR CRUSHED SURFACING BENEATH ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING (ACP), REFER TO THE TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION SHEET C-6. WATER DISTRIBUTION b, / 0 m 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND UNDAMAGED. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, THE SAME MANUFACTURER OF EACH ITEM SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. CONTRACTORS SHALL FURNISH A WATERTIGHT PLUG OF THE APPROPRIATE SIZE WHICH SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE END OF THE WATER MAIN ANYTIME WORK IS DELAYED OR STOPPED. 2. NO CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING MAINS WILL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT BY MEANS OF AN APPROVED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE PRIOR TO SATISFACTORY FLUSHING, TESTING, DISINFECTION, AND RECEIPT OF SATISFACTORY BACTERIOLOGICAL TEST RESULTS. 3. TAPS UP TO 2" ON THE EXISTING MAINS WILL BE DONE BY THE CITYI OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. LINE SIZES GREATER THAN',2" SHALL BE DONE BY A QUALIFIED COMPANY WHO SPECIALIZES IN WATER TAPS AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 5. THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING INSPECTOR MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEASE 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE OWNER OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT SHALL NOTIFY UTILITIES OF A PERSON WHO CAN BE CONTACTED REGARDING PROBLEMS DURING CONSTRUCTION ON A 24 HOUR BASIS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE ANY CITY WATER VALVES. ANY WATER OUTAGES MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE PLANNED OUTAGE. SCHEDULED OUTAGES START AT 9 A.M. AND TERMINATE AT 3 P.M. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE PVC CONFORMING WITH ASTM D-3034, SDR 35. PIPE BEDDING SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. 2. SIDE SEWER LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE CAPPED WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG AND SHALL BE MARKED FOR LOCATION WITH A 2% 4" BOARD, PAINTED WHITE, MARKED "SEWER" AND NOTING THE DEPTH OF THE STUB. 10 GAUGE LOCATOR WIRE IS REQUIRED ON ALL PLASTIC PIPE. 4. ALL TESTING AND CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CITY OF EDMONDS. 5. SEWERS SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. TESTS WILL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 4.0 PSI FOR 15 MINUTES. 6. ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH. WHERE THE EXISTING FOUNDATION IS UNSATISFACTORY IT SHALL BE EXCAVATED BELOW GRADE AND BACKFILLED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. SEWER BEDDING SHALL BE A GRANULAR MATERIAL AND PLACED TO PROPER GRADE AND SHALL PROVIDE UNYIELDING CONTINUOUS SUPPORT FOR THE PIPE. SHEET INDEX: COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES SURVEY (REFERENCE ONLY) DEMOLITION PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLAN DETAILS MAP NO SCALE DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: LOTS 23 AND 24 IN BLOCK 1 OF PLAT OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LOTS 17 THROUGH 22 INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 1 OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE NORTHEASTERLY 16 FEET OF SAID LOT 17, CONVEYED TO THE TOWN OF EDMONDS FOR PUBLIC ALLEY BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 88 OF DEEDS., PAGE 217. HORIZONTAL DATUM,• BASED ON CENTERLINE OF 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, WHICH BEARS N 29'00'00" E ACCORDING TO RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7610250106. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED, AS FOUND ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9407205005. NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRANSFORMER PAD UNDER NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELEVATED PORTION OF BUILDING. ELEVATION = 40.20' SEE DRAWING FOR BENCH MARKS SET FOR SITE USE. AREA: SITE CONTAINS 17,056 SQUARE FEET OR 0.392 ACRES. EDMONDS UTILITY PROVIDERS ELECTRICITY SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT 2320 CALIFORNIA STREET EVERETT, WA. 98201 (425) 783-8300 TELEPHONE GTE BUSINESS OFFICE 1800 41ST STREET EVERETT, WA. 98206 (800) 483-5100 NATURAL GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY 1700 E. COLLEGE WAY MOUNT VERNON, WA. 98273 (888) 225-5773 (#3) SEWER, WATER AND STORM CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA. 98020 (425) 775-2525 APPROVED F0, ZONING UCTI CITY OF EDMO DS 121 5TH AVE. CONSTRI", r ; Al EDMONDS, WA. 98020 (425) 771-02 0 DATE: «.....,,... SITE IS ZONED "BC" ( COMMUNITWJ3U LESS - 2000 SHEET C1 OF 7 SHEET C2 OF 7 SHEET C3 OF 7 SHEET C4 OF 7 SHEET C5 OF 7 SHEET C6 OF 7 SHEET C7 OF 7 - 9,500 CY CUT - 0.000 CY FILL - 9,500 CY CUT NET CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800- 424- 5555 z q-muo:� mot- O to U �... V) t Ln Orornnz NIONT n am roclf LLJ > 'G ocoU co 00000 N Z 0 t4l; X _I o L" < J w 4d (/) tY W I- Q Ljj Z wo 0 41 Q0) Z LlJ , o .. J Z3�:- 3: U rn�0 owoo M N (n 0) U) z_ In wLLJ ,- � 7_ ::F o U 5 0 0 F� U w U � � w a- p UJ w a- w w (IfV) o /o Ld 0 LL_ II 0 V) z 0 0 0 0 W o w drawn by±BT ed by PAAP TEW.-mmmscale'1 =12/01 job no. 2000212-01 sheet 01 of C EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING LAYERSET: XSUR Plotted: 05/08/01 15: 05 o o 0 X cn n �J > T\\� �.J N `rO(�) -, c�J cn 133�J1S S3HV ........ ........ _.._..�„�z-- �1b.L `V cli c 00 \s �� (NOLIGNOO ?1OOd Ol 211Vd) 0 NHS 1N]V 33A'dd 1-lVHdSV ' o J CAND ti �V �� Ji�VM 81�2�ON00 �J �Jc�J ��' �� cb _ Cb -V0'OZ L M „ OO,OO. Lq N o� �I21 Nd�d v c, Oc„ !j ,0'6ll X N �J3N2JOO J.12�3dOdd ��tiW o �� 100-1d HSINI� d0 '3'S ,l'L CO SI 2=00 0U18 I '00'0� D m � o I D = o a.0 G'- - o C ran Im � o '— m z -0 03 II o�d`J o C _ N cn n io m N m o D I Q N rn ci AS Ed Im (3 J�j o I 0 ---ss- z BNI-1 �1y�d0�id d0 8-S �' C ti u 4?,�✓ �; z C) C) �� ss- o�J soy cn m 0 N i D c �00 02 N .c� -�O I. IJ o v r n I CG)--------- I G�' cn O` G ,-V0'OZ t. 3 „00,00. l9 S G" ti✓ �� V < '----------------------- -- �J G� I m .O — 1 o I " • d� �d'cJ of o; �o ooss o�- v W OD X ticc c r (c , c, cn �� nJ � C-1 — — — - ----------------------------- ---- �— — — — — — — — — — v-------------- -- I C K\ c: �o `./ I I �00-9 L I . G" �"C" o I X I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — co' I I 00 I cn .. - - -- as z t SS,.B SS«g o (oriend) ��d j __ 0 0, �\ Z �\ N `J t N FM C�A-m C L oc-�. -\S, c/) I� N m a � v � N o ID SURVEY FOR REFERENCE ONLY N S EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING cr a � a N m c� I a J N v o EDMONDS WASHINGTON NO I REVISION U D Z 2 m n o U) 0 m �� \Z TV, .�s S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. SET CHISLLty "v AT TOP CURB ELEVATION = 22.01 — — SECOND AVf- NUE SOU I I -I ,WPROVED POU-1 151 HUI; I Pull GUM �b -W —�%-------- - ;- GRAPHIC SCALE 1 `J�� J J/ ASF'FIALT PAVEMENT �- S7 FAIR CONDITION ASPI-IAL I PAVEME F IN FEET ) i ) 1 inch = 10 ft. TO BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR LEGEND `s I �" c �^ c. ➢� O `� _ t FILTER FABRIC FENCE �� c �� TO BE REMOVED BY APPROPRIATE v - uW o END REMOVAL UTILITY o cP� 6� O O o '�' OF CURB & CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE J' o -- - --- --- GUTTER — — — — — — — -- — — — — — �`-?__ — — -- _ — - — _ - —� — PROPOSED CONTOUR 18 TO BE PROTECTED DURING �, s J --- ------ --- - -------°---�. --- - - - - ---- O CONSTRUCTION EXISTING SPOT GRADE �� C y b ° ° CONCRETE DRIVE b CON .RIF WALI� J ° n ------- b SILT COLLAR PROTECTION ° ° ° g ° / ° ° ° n ® SAWCUT LINE (SEE SHEETS C5 & C6) �,D b ° ° b �, ° ^ .-� > \� ' WIRE MESH ,.. BEGIN REMOVAL b b °` --- ° D b SEE GRAVEL ° ° n � b ° b � ° ° b b° ---�•-------------- ..----- ----- FILTER DETAIL OF CURB & _79'U0 D_0'_E 1 <1 O9 GUTTER-�� /- -- - - -- ----- -- - --- - - - --- - - O SAVE AND RELOCATE = DIVERSION DITCH - — - V. 59•1 --- ---- / �� =\\� TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK KEYSTONE WALL <��7�� HAY BALES L� �` o \ �, \ O CURB AND GUTTER TO BE r- '� �/ , Q�� ,!J REMOVED AND REPLACED -v7 o �� ° b D CONTRACTOR NOTES: cn .,, z , n \ r= to - �' b —I o r __ SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED 1. EXISTING ON -SITE ASPHALT AND CONCRETE 10 -< _o :D r i �' / , r g AND REPLACED MATERIAL MAY BE RECYCLED AND USED FOR "- - o'' ��'1 - �'Li O MATCH AND PROTECT FILL IN AREA SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHINICAL �' _� p ( ENGINNER. ALL RECYCLED MATERIAL MUST BE \D® �� \ ` /' j EXIST. CURB) REDUCED TO 1-1/2" SIZE OR SMALLER. b O C— \ m-u) ASPHALT 2. CAP SANITARY SIDE SEWERS AT THE M -o �' PROPERTY LINE AFTER THE DEMOL111ON OF ,1 �! THE BUILDING. CALL FOR INSPECTION f-r� (LYLE CHRISMAN, 425-771-0220) PRIOR i " DEMOLITION NOTES TO BACKFILLING. 30.00' THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ALL UTILITY \ COMPANIES PRIOR TO DISCONNECTION OF ANY SERVICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS b oz ° o \ \\' �� `�' i RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND COMPLYING WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE { ° Z ° i /, , b � o RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. f q I j ° I ; \ �� ALL UTILITIES (WITHIN THE PROPERTY) INCLUDING STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS SHALL BE CAPPED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND -{ COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. N \ ��` CIO�� O �` c5� THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES r 0 � � � � � � WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN SERVICE. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PUBLIC o b ° b o ��_` (, l ---------------- c1 SERVICE GAS AND ELECTRIC LINES AND US WEST TELEPHONE LINES. O b ° �� w� O " :° �c9 ,z \ ,�� `-' cl ALL STRUCTURE INCLUDING BASEMENT WALLS AND FLOOR SLABS SHALL BE ° b OO �� COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. o Fr] O v) o r, _ _s z �NO EXISTING UTILITY, STRUCTURES OR UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE o \ ,o ABANDONED IN PLACE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ENGINEER, OWNER AND GOVERNING AGENCY. ° ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE -� (_0 AND LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY m° �' RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT CITY OF EDMONDS b'� ° _00 ®� �'- c'o FIBER OPTIC CABLE 00 b �k 2 LIMITED TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, DISPOSAL, HOURS OF OPERATION. D b \` --_ `, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS FOR SITE DEMOLITION. COST OF ALL PERMITS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE _ \ o T CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT. 11 7 ALL EXISTING BUSHES, TREES AND TREE ROOTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ° \ �0��--� SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. VV vV ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF � <� ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. -P \_U o lu THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PROVIDED BY THE - \o'' �� \ OWNER AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY �Z�v \m z DURING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. IT SHALL ALSO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE V.v c� �n o �� .0 _ _ -- CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT THE EXISTING STRUCTURES FOR ANY OTHER D \ - b ° \rTl OC \`� ' ter` _� � \ ` � I--�------�----------------------�--------- � -- I I I CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE DEMOLLITION PROCEDURES. D ( ono m'j .o \`z_ �'� ANY CONDITIONS WHICH MAY BE UNCOVERED DURING THE PROCESS OF m _ f O rrl o'cn \ I I I I DEMOLITION SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. (9.C) I I I I I I I I ADDITIONAL EXPENSES INCURRED BY UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS SHALL BE __U - 0 I I I 18 PA < <� SPACES I I APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO THE ADDITIONAL WORK. _m -o .�' ��J, I I I I I I I I I - J ,<p I IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY \p 59.0' \ `� - - - FOR THE TYPE AND QUANTITY OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF --- -- A BID. — — — _ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL_ HAVE WATER ON SITE FOR DUST ABATEMENT AT ALL I (� — — — — — — - G- - --- 6 2- TIMES DURING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. vZ o v- o�C -- - -----U��T---C� - z � - - -_- - _ _ -- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL OF o �<� / _ -2°�Q -� 57 �, v< <,� o U� — -j ALL DEBRIS. BURNING ON SITE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. 12�D T— ,y �� —� 1 PAVE 0 ASPHAL PAVEMENT Z wtiW (GOOD CONDITION) /_ _ ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC UTILITIES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS A RESULT OF THE Q o I 9 < - /—:___-- - - _ _ _ '- DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRCTOR. - _- — - s _ �- REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DAMAGED PARTY. o z - Q 16 ALLEY (PUS C) �, 1 o M j' ly �" ��-_ ` � EXISTING WATER LINES SIZE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF SURVEY. WHILE DEMOING /� �' �' ? AND CAPPING EXISITNG WATER LINES DETERMINE SIZE OF EACH LINE. IF THE w v <' O -' �' D v % !. EXISTING WATER LINES ARE 1-1/2 OR LARGER THEY CAN BE USED TO SERVICE w 0 �' <. �� CITY OF EDMONDS FIBER OPTIC v �� ,� v? �S THE PROPOSED BUILDING. IF SMALLER THEY WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONDED AND 0 �" OD' "o 6, CABLE `o v-o cf> `�`,_0 A NEW DOMESTIC WATER LINE WILL BE REQUIRED. 00 0 0 �� n \ o. C� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR APPROVAL �, I �: << �� << <; �� <<_� << t� <<� PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. w cn o . w -41 O Q - -I n U: \2000212-01\xero.dwg N N W r mot- oo tn :;E mot- Or) r2 o f�U p nLnnz �rnM�q� LLIJ oo(C� zN LL 0000 N05NIL v' X _1 U o LL_ < w (n © cr Ld Q Lu W z wo Q Z as W �o J zZ�tL0 3 > >`'-;i' to U rn�No N( W O�i m V) z L �- z w 0 :�i o 0 U W U L U w a- rr 0 Li w 0- w V) �� ^J V z O I— z Z < Dm z Q '_"' W z U C LL I- II __J 0 C W V) Q z 0 0 0 w drawn by checked by PAB TAP =V.__4 scale date 1 "=10' 2/12/01 job no. 2000212- 01 sheet C 3 of C of rr w� N N a O C O \ LI H C W V Z � 4 W + Q J Q U: \2000212-01 \xero.dwg S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. z 0 J m U Z 1 Q LL J ,.Q !Z CD to Z _ Z Q 0 ry O 0 0OW L6 o� C� 0 N N 00 O O O I— O w 0' 4) W +1 >- +' Q _O J IZ U: \2000212-01 \xgrd.dwg SET CHISELtu AT TOP CURB ELEVATION = 22•01 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH I I� C SEE DETAIL. / L� J PROPOSED ASPAULT PATCH / 1 2 CITY OF EDMONDS FIBER OPTIC CABLE "p J) 4N �L LEGEN D PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 8.50 PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR RIDGE LINE EXIST. SPOT GRADE FINISH GRADE AT BOTTOM OF WALL FINISH GRADE AT TOP OF WALL NOTE: QiC - 7t7 -7 R INC rn - o� a T.W. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING CAR RAMP GRADING AND BASEMENT FLOOR GRADING. FOUNDATION DRAINS WILL BE DIRECTED TO A SUMP PUMP. REFERENCE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION. GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 10 ft. U � �raoLo :2 �0�20 -- OI �► O r� I I U ,•� Lo rl) z V I L j CC�� 3I�V 0000 N00NI- :D .. I -.7 _ .♦♦.ice♦♦ X V r g �.. Q W S J W Q Lai wo 0 as z WV) O z n ,^ _I gw� N Y / rn�0 O W 00 m N (n 0 07 1— z W F- z W O o v � � 0 Fes- ULLI U } LdU W IL ry 0 W W M 1n O s W W In ll� 5 11 !I0■ men 0 z o z 0 z V) D z m Q -I W °- U 0 LL- z � Q O a- 0 z O 0 0 0 Ld o W sheet 1 5 of C 7 S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. r, �0 C) r- 0 `L �, J, J Z - \ lT' Z- - �;> V '0� o �cp, Ci X Ir s _ U) Qo CA X 00 �vC)A ^� -9 J m CP U\ LIJ I o� v)_ 0 Z 0 o o � r- D O CV '1 N 00 O , O w V) o _o J Cl- U: \2000212-01 \xgrd.dwg S f _q Cn V 1 Fri f�l -p Tp SET CHISELtu AT TOP CURB ELEVATION = 22.01 _Irn SECOND AVENUE SOUTH I -8�vv I 2N8" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) CONNECT USING 8" I 1-8"x4" TEE (MJxFL) ROMAC SEWER I 1-4" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) SADDLE. IE=14.9f I 43LF-4" D.I.P. VERIFY PRIOR TO 1—CONC. BLOCK CONSTRUCTION. I g-- I c C' �l rl (.) EXISTING SANITARY STUB ; TAP INTO EXISTING WATER EXISTING ISANITA�F--Y STUB C) cp0 IF POSSIBLE REUSE s Cp_PROP. SSCO EXISTING METER IF ( ( ) W LOCKING ® POSSIBLE LAMPHOLE y l' � I MANHOLE TYPE II W/ SOLI LOCKING LID TE=23.0 IE=15.3 STEPS T I BE POLYPROLENE 1, 18 -FIRE HYD. ASS'Y. W/4" STORZ ADAPTER - 1-8%6" TEE (FLxFLxFL) 1 -6" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) „(RESILIENT TYPE) 2N8 GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) (RESILIENT TYPE) 8LF-6" D.I.P. 1- eO &.--BL-©EK 8" PVC SS -- OIL/WATER / SPRINK� ER - ---- — I SEPARATOR _ / t Room \ \ / -- U p BY UTILITY VAULT -� / 8 FLAP GAT/ DDCV \ �\ / COMPANY OR APPROVED BIKE o EQUi/ALENT A3 RACK o FLOOR DRAIN (TYP.) \ \ / / / \ / J. REFER TO JZ MECHANICAL PLANS / Ic / \ \ .. ••oil / � / \ I o ••a - O ° — e(V — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o ° \ FLOOR DRAIN LINES ° °•. .•s I \\ (TYP.) REFER TO // \ / \\ / I o MECHANICAL PLANS \ / / \ / BASEMENT PARKING LEVEL \\ / E'EEVATION 19.9/ o ri / v • / / DUMP 3TER nx °. r --- -_ ► .. a .. :• 9% -0 GA O-p - - — - - - � •..-vim - - 16' ALLEY (PUBLIC) 8H-T - S 29°00'00" W 142.UyO ---0H T L h O� 00 —30 �E) n p JO L, `", C P \ O, p� O/ J O LEGEND: C CONCRETE PIPE CH CATCH BASIN CMI' CORRUGATED METAL PIPE E ELECTRICAL LINE G GAS MAIN IE INVERT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD LINE SD STORM DRAIN LINE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SS SANITARY SEWER LINE SSM11 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T TELEPHONE LINE LIG UNDERGROUND LINE (R) RECORD DATA GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 10 ft. GENERAL NOTES: 0 THIS PLAN SHEET IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW ALL ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND THE FOLLOWING CIVIL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS. SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. PROPOSED SEWER ACCESS POINTS (MANHOLES) AND WATER LINE ANGLE POINT LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. ALL SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35, WITH RING TITE JOINTS. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE COPPER, TYPE K OR POLYETHYLENE (PE) SDR-7-PE 3408, AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D2239-81. PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM PRESSURES ALLOWED BY THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. DRAINAGE SYSTEM INFORMATION CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. PROPOSED CATCH BASIN LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. DETENTION SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, FRAMES, GRATES, MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. NOTE: FLOOR DRAINS IN THE BASEMENT SHALL TIGHTLINE TO THE PROPOSED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE DISCHARGING TO THE SANITARY SEWER. SEE DETAILS FOR OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. FOUNDATION DRAINS WILL BE DIRECTED TO A SUMP PUMP PER FUTURE DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFERENCE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION. PIPING INTO THE STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT WILL BE DESIGNED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER. ALL PVC PIPE PENETRATIONS INTO THE VAULT AND MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A SAND COLLAR.. F�. WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PER LS DESIGN. ® IF EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE IS NOT 1-1/2" A NEW WATER MAIN MUST BE INSTALLED. CGS► INC UZ`� •�E `WSoa U) F-• w� M Z :2 w o U N 0 F- U Li U } � U w ILfy o w w o- V) o Ld v) ui It K•_ 0 �O z C� z _C ' 'D W Q LLJ n U_ ►— LL 0 f- 0 z 0 0 O W o LLi drawn by checked by PAB TAP 9C01e" date =10' 2 12 01 job no. 2000212- 01 sheet v6 of C7 S.E. 1 A SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. 0 tn N VAULT ACCESS POINT REMOVABLE WATER- TIGHT COUPLING 6' MAX. 12" MIN. PLATE WITH ORIFICE AS —/ SPECIFIED, BOLTED TO FLANGE OR DRILLED CAP v OVERFLOW=23.00 FRAME & LADDER . 1-1.45"0 ORIFICE IE=21.88 PIPE SUPPORTS (2 MIN.): 3" x G� .090" ALUMINUM W/ 5/8" STAINLESS BOLTS CLEANOUT GATE: 15"0 RISER TEE SHEAR GATE �--- 8"O OUTLET 9/16"0 ORIFICE iv IE=17.78 IE=17.78 RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ 0.73"0 N IE=15.78 ORIFICE (SHARP EDGE). ORIFICE SHALL BE SHOP DRILLED, NOT CUT. RESTRICTOR TEE N.T.S. ti3 0 03 oq VAULT SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE DESIGNED & STAMPED BY A PROFESSIONAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. o... ...... —I J _ ::D m w 0 J � � )moo ) J Z O II-- � J0L Lv 00 N \ N cc) 00 O \ Ln 0 W � N L,J +' >- 41 a ° �m U: \2000212-01 \xcov.dwg CEILING EL=24.00 EMER OVERFLOW TE=25.04 W.S. EL= 23.5 FF_ 1.5' IMIN.''' 2.4' MA 1 04' LID -------------- ----- --------- --- ----- OVERFLOW EL_ = 23.00 POLYPROPYLENE LADDER 5.22' STORAGE SECTION A -A N.T.S. ORIFICE (TYE.) N.T.S. BOLT LOCKING RING & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" 5' FREEBOARD RESTRICTOR TEE SEE DETAIL, LEFT. 8" OUTLET IE=17.78 FF EL=17.78 2" COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS "B" ACP 4" COMPACTED DEPTH, CRUSHED SURFACING, TOP COURSE (CSTC) 6" COMPACTED DEPTH GRAVEL BORROW OR EXISTING MATERIAL, AS DETERMINED BY ON -SITE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. REMOVE DELETARIOUS MATERIAL AND COMPACT AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BY ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. CONCRETE GUTTER DETAIL N.T.S. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLAN FOR INPUT PIPE 24" DIAMETER - A CLEAR ACCESS I DETENTION VAULT SCALE: 1 "=10' 8" OUTLET IE=17.78 SEE VAULT CONTROL TEE DETAIL. CURB do GUTTER - �?°. " MgkFS/0 NOTES: 1. IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS 15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT. 2. DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON 2" OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 3000PSI CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK. FORM INSPECTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO POUR. 1/2" LIP CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1.. °I • � f op 0 •CW,gY�r A OR �'1F �qY �M/�Fo er cRFgQF 70 � Fib eF EXPANSION JOINT SEE TRANSITION DETAIL, BELOW - 5' EXPANSION 1/2" UP JOINT 1:10 SLOPE 6" CURB DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITION DETAIL FOR CURB AND GUTTER 7' �— EXPANSION JOINT j N N//\\jam 6" CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY COMPACTED SUBGRADE SECTION B-B NO SCALE DRIVEWAY, CURB 4 N.T.S. NOTES ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 1. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2000 WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD POSSESS AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THESE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PAVING WORK SHALL CONSIST OF NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (ACP) AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. 3. ALL EDGES OF EXISTING ACP SHALL BE SAWCUT TO PROVIDE FOR NEAT JOINTS WITH NEW ASPHALT OR OTHER SURFACES WHERE NEW GRADES MEET EXISTING. REMOVED ASPHALT CHUNKS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE IN AN APPROVED MANNER, OR BROKEN INTO PIECES WITH 4" MAXIMUM DIMENSION AND COMPACTED WITHIN THE FILL GREATER THAN 6" BELOW SUBGRADE. 4. CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE FURNISHED AND PLACED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE MATERIALS, METHODS, AND TOLERANCES OF THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 5- 04.E THROUGH 5-04.3(21). FINAL COMPACTED DEPTH OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" OR AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1. PAINT STRIPPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS INDICATED ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND DETAILS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PAINTED STRIPES SHALL BE 4" IN WIDTH. 3. STRIPING PAINT SHALL BE AS LISTED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS, OR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN EQUAL APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PRO -MAR TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT WHITE 829 W 1 YELLOW B29 Y 2 OR PRESERVATIVE TRAFFIC PAINT OR NORTON/MORRIS APPLICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. 4. PAINT STRIPES FOR HANDICAPPED STALLS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE CURRENT CITY AND STATE BARRIER FREE CODE PROVISIONS AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. W cc CL 6 • -tOOL0:E d-Oroo V) t- o V I � U OI V I ^� > G 0000 z NDONLL XJ LL. < Ld 3 J ® W a Z wo Z LLJ as J D � Z�Lo 5; VjIn V) U rn�op NNrn M� W V) f- z w z w z o U V) 0 Ld U } L U w a-(y C) w w o- wLd 1111151111111111 lJ 0 z O H z z Q ICY') 1 W U < II-1- LL_ O U) z 0 t.l 0O W o w sheet C / of / 1 1 1 I 1 ..�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- �7 -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-------------------------------- PUBLIC ALLEY A 1 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND ,`.bray. Common Name Botanical Name treea: CFP Capital Flowering Pear Pyrus caUeryana "Capital" 3" cal./B&B sco Dwarf Hinoke False Chamaecyparfa obtuse "Hinoke Nana" 18" hgL/coat. a RSPJY Rhodo. "PJZJ" Same 15-18"/cont. symbole/ground covers.• AC Annual Color Per Landscape Architect 4" pots 0 10" o.c. Ceranium, Harigolda, Ageratum CTY Candy tuft Iberia aempervirene i gal./coat. DLY Day Lilly HemerocaUia Stella de Orra 1 gal./coat. Street tree grates: Urban Accessories OT Title 24 36" square with frame set in concrete walk, grate to be cast iron ASM 48 class 35b or better, finish black powder coated. Provide tree guards Urban Accessories Series RR wit black power coating. Urban Accessories (425) 487 0488, Woodinville. Washington. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. Clean subgrade by removing alLundesirable vegetation sasses, weeds, blackberries, scotekbroorn and poplar seedlina Inabuling roots. Leave subgrade in landscape areas minimum 6" below paving. Remove aIl debris from site. a 2. Provide minimum 12" depth 60-40 mix from Puget Sound Topsoil NO EXCEPTIONS (253) 833-0374 in all shrub beds. Scarify subgrade by rototilling and add topsoil on surface, mix topsoil and subgrade thoroughly. Add additional topsoil as needed to contour shrub beds including required berms. 4. Provide minimum 2" depth fine blend hem —fir mulch to all planting beds. Mulch from Pacific Topsail's. Kent, Washington. Fill all planting beds and lawn areas to within 1" of top of all curbs and walks. Slope all planting beds and lawn areas to drain. y 5. Provide one (1) year warranty for all plant materials and workmanship. 6. Locate, protect and avoid disruption of all above and below grade utilities and site features prior to construction. Contractor is responsible for any resulting damages during construction. Call locate before you dig at 1 800 424-5555. 7. All work performed shall conform with City of Edmonds landscape and irrigation requirements, codex and specifications. q 8. Verify all quantities shown on the plant list and plans. N discrepancies exist between the graphic representation and the numeric totals, the graphic representation shall rule. 9. Ali plant materials to be specimen quality with full, symmetrical trunk and foliage, unless otherwhfs noted. Fertilize all plantings with "Osmacote" plant tabs. Install. 2 cups per tree larger than 3", 1 cup per tree less then 3". 1/2 cup per 5 gal.. 1/4 per '�43 and .1 gal., 1/8 cup per 6" and 4" pots. *' 11. invire proper drmi ►sae of all placating holes prior to installing plant meterials.� H planting; holes do not drain or it hea-.y clay soils are evident contact landscape architect. I 1 DETAIL: TREE PLANTING NO SCALE 6 RHPJM � 1 CO Q 1 CFP .N RATE PER SPEC. .TE COLLAR 12" X 6" WITH 1 #4 DIAM REBAR BRACKET FOR TREE GRATE PER SPEC. 'AVER PER ARCHITECT SIDEWALK AMENDED SOIL 1 CO 2ND AVENUE SOUTH -- - - - -- - - - - - - ---- - - - -. r ula' 7 w.?e7 �.-_7_9 RM eml MWAMM salt. MIX WL DETAIL- SHRUB AND GROUND COVER PLANTING NO SCALE 11 . . T"I••� 8 RHPJM 0 1 CO LA.NDSCA.PF PLANT!Nr, PI AN rram.in f � scaLE: v:3'.r-0' i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I. 1 1 i 1 1 1 CFP 1 CFP 10 CTY 3 DLY 1 CFP i CFP 10 CTY 3 DLY 1 CFP ,_I CFP _ 10 CTY _ 3 DLY 1 CFP I 3 0 1 �=O Q M C O I > m Zp U Z 1 C Q w = Li Of O Z J I- Q 1 m Q< Z a ILJ ~ w ZO F- I 0- C7 Z O H (n - - -�-- - - Q~ W Z �¢ d 2 p J W W aa_ of� o of o Q U W p 0_ Q O 07 m h-- () Ln Q� 1 F ZNa' of of 00 of M Q H O O a~M 0 0 o Z w a �= o aMo o w o o ~ o w LLI F H F- 1 w F~- -Zi-}`' H_ w Z 0 O U � V) I M M m m m Z 0 Z 1 CD 0 00 C7, __ Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates Landscape Architects & Environmental Planners, ASLA 6625 South 190th Street, Suite B108 phone: (425) 251-0455 Kent,Washington 98032-•2123 fax: (425) 251-0476 1 RECEIVED APR - 6 2001 PERMIT COUNTER STATR OF WASHMTON ReGMTEMM LAMMAPR ARCHMWT F_ W W z � LLJ Z C� O Q 0.. W Q L� C L� o u C,()z 0 V) WI 0 LLJ z z W 0 > Q 0 � W N LR15 JOTS • 200 L I , 0 «. 1:% .: � 1 1 ,.- 1W'abr:,1 �& t�:Sw3��iri��u^l�uF >i �rOlir.ta � •'.�'i{�� ts�� Y ..w:� � •� �� t _ i' �� ''�1 � .,_ ��, c� �T � �� IN IRRIGATION NOTES L Irrigation design and layout assumes minimum 80 lb& static water pressure 85 GPM at point of connection. Verify PSI and GPM. If discrepancy exists report to Landscape Architect and owner before proceeding. 2. The Landscape Contractor sban inspect the site and verify existing conditions and dimensions prior to bidding and construction. & Irrigation plan Is diagrammatic. Adjust pipe, valves and irrigation heads according to field conditions and plant locations. Report any discrepancies to Landscape Architect 4. Coordinate irrigation points of connection and location of automatic eontroller with General Contractor. L60 Water Peter by General Contractor. Coordinate all work with other trades in 5. All valves will be placed in valve boxes in a manner which facilitates access for maintenance. Locate valves in shrub and ground cover beds unless approved by Landscape Architect No Valve boxes in lawn areas. e. All components of irrigation system shall be installed and adjusted to provide adequate coverage and no over spray onto buildings, windows, or paved area& contractor is responsible for providing a complete working irrigation system. 7. contractor is responsible for any damages to building and infrastructure 8. Bury control wires below mainline and tape to mainline every 10' cc. 9. Flush mainline before installing valves. Flush zone lines before installing nozzle& Test entire system before backfillina tranche& during landscape construction. 10. Electric Valves and Back&m prevention assembly to be placed in below grade valve boxes and installed in shrub beds, Verify that valve boxes are not placed where plant materials an to be installed. Provide sleeving under all paved surfaces. 1L Provide full coverage.to all lawn and shrub beds. Insten additional irrigation heads as necessary to achieve full coverage and water to all plantings. 12. 120 AC Electrical power source at controller location shall be provided by others. The Landscape Contractor shall make the final connection from the electrical source to the controller. 13. All irrigation heads to be installed perpendicular to finish grade unless otherwise specified. is t haS t K accompffie compressed air into the system through the quick coupler valve at the point of connection. 15. Demonstrate working system to building maintenance manager upon completion and acceptance. le. Locate all utilities before digging. Call 1-(800) 424-5555. 17. Install irrigation system in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. 18. Yount Rain Sensor near top of building. Place in approved location with Landscape Architect. 19. From controller install one spare yellow wire to each valve box. 20. Contractor to provide reproducible mylar As -built drawings to Landscape Architect prior to close- out of job. 21. Electrical control mires to be spliced in control boxes only. -40w- i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 2ND AVENUE SOUTH -- — — — — — — — — — — —q-- — — — — LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN SCALE: twor-0 PLAN 1�11� I I 1 I 1 300-01 1 I 1 1 Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates Landscape Architects & Environmental Planners, ASLA 6625 South 190th Street, Suite B108 phone: (425) 251-0455 Kent,Washington 98032-2123 fax: (425) 251-0476 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 ' APR - 6 2001 IPERMIT C01INT1=0 0 Q O m Z 2 U) W Z 0 O J F- Q Q U 5 d U a-w Qbi F- I= cr Q W- Of O O 0 0 M m � En 00 0 M tD 00rn J Q O Q Z ~ Z 1,.1 � FW - a \ O Of Z w o Z J O m O O 0 C) m m in in y Z 2O U) U) Z U U > w ZLLJ M Of Lii ~ W Z Q \ w Of U F- n- O Ei J N O ►= of 00 Q � O U � U) o o m m 0 W U I. W O W ry I-- V) v rn i 0 z � 1 Li z LLJ ME DRAWN LM :•"tY1 W1l ME: GODS -1ST FINISH GRADE JUMBO VALVE BOX 2 CU. FT. NIA GRAVEL SUMP SPARE WIRE MIN. 18' LENGTH 12' REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENfER PER LEGEND SCHEDULE 80 MALE ADAPTER (1 OF 2) SCHEDULE 80 UNION (1 OF 2) VALVE BOX SCHEDULE 80 W ELL (1 OF 4) SCH(1�)40 PIPE TYPMANUAL DRAIN VALVE IRRIGATION MAINLINE PIPE 2' PIPE FROM POINT -OF -CONNECTION NOTE: 1. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENIER AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT. VERIFY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO SCALE 30-INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED WATER PROOF CONNECTION (1 OF 2) VALVE BOX WITH COVER: 12-INCH SIZE FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH REMOTE CONTROL VALVE: RAIN BIRD PEB PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE). PVC SCH 40 ELL SCH. 80 U (1)Ei46,.S%M PVC SCK gQ. -N► - (LENGTH Pz mmunnX9 BRICK (1 OF 41�) SCH 80 NIPPLE (2-INCH LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND SCH 40 ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER PVC LATERAL PIPE 3.0-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED DRAIN ROCKS POINT OF CONNECTION DETAIL IBA WATER MIE'TER BY OTHERS i' STOP VALVE - MUELLER SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNION-1' V 05L CHECK A55EM5L1r 1-1/4' MAIN LINE V MANUAL DRAIN VAL QUICK COUPLER 1' FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER: RAIN BIRD 1800-SAM-PRS W/PLASTIC MPR NOZZI.E 4- POP-UP HEAD (LAWN) 12" POP-UP HEAD (SHRUB) (SEE LEGEND) PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LF4G7jH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 411 rmEET aj. PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELT. ___�---PVC MAINLINE PPE PVL SCHED. 80 NIPPLE LENGTH AS REQ'D PVC LATERAL PIPE M; PLACE ALL LAWN HEADS MIN. Y FROM EDGE OF CURB OR WALK DO NOT CONNECT INTO SIDE PORT OF HEAD FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH QUICK -COUPLING VALVE: RAIN BIRD MODEL 7 VALVE BOX WITH COVER: 6-INCH SIZE 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL BRICK (1 OF 2) PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE SCH 40 ELL 2" x 2' CEDAR STAKE W/ STAINLESS STEEL GEAR CLAMPS OR EQUIVALENT NOTE: SUPPORT SYSTEM 1. FURNISH FITTINGS AND PIPING NOMINALLY SIZED IDENTICAL TO NOMINAL QUICK COUPLING VALVE INLET SIZE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SPECIFICATION NOTES i°LAN NOI�T'Fl I— w w F— C- z ULd 0 :�i 0 —� < F— CD w � Q LL � 0 v z 0 � W � zLLJ z w 0 > W cV DATE MAR Z, 2001 RECEIVED APR - 6 2001 Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates W&9Km N OF PERMIT COUNTER Landscape Architects & Environmental Planners, ASLA RWG>BTEM �D i 6625 South 190th Street, Suite B108 phone: (425) 251-0455 nM Kent,Washington 98032-2123 fax: (425) 251-0476 OD 1sr CAS NOT. 4a2 At 4t 4P T.4 AT Aljs�- �1�iva��c Rec�jver) APR 6 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICE S CTH, EDMON CITY OF DS GENERAL NOTES S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP: 27 No R GE. 3 E., W.M. L 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, CITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2000 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION - (WSDOT) 2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CONSTRUCTION TO INCLUDE CLEARING/LOGGING OR GRADING THE SITE/LOT CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE LOCATED AND FIELD IDENTIFIED. S 3. ALL WORK WITHIN THE SITE AND CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY R.O. W HALL BE, SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR OR A DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT (425) 771-0220 ext 1325 TO SCHEDULE A PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. FIELD CHANGES (REVISIONS) WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERED AS-BUILTS BE SUPPLIED PRIOR TO SITE APPROVAL. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SATISFACTORILY MAINTAIN THESE FACILITIES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. TRENCH BACKFILL OF NEW UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE PERCENTAGE OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (MODIFIED PROCTOR) AS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE PROPERLY BEDDED AND THE TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE CONTROL DENSITY FILL (2 SACK MIX). 6. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS, OR CLEARING LIMITS MAY RESULT IN VIOLATIONS AND/OR REVOCATION OF PROJECT PERMITS, PLAN APPROVAL, AND BOND FORECLOSURES. STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STORM DRAINAGE (SD) PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP) WITH SMOOTH INTERIOR. CPEP SHALL BE ADS N-12 OR HANCOR HI-1 OR EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WHERE OTHER PIPE IS INDICATED, IT SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), ASTM C-14 (24" DIAMETER AND LARGER TO BE REINFORCED ASTM C-76), OR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP). CMP TO BE GALVANIZED STEEL WITH TREATMENT 1 ASPHALT COATING OR BETTER. ALL RCP AND CMP SHALL HAVE RUBBER GASKETS. MINIMUM COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PIPE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH, OR IF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION IS UNSATISFACTORY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL WITH A GRAVEL MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE PIPE. 3. PIPE BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE OR PIPE -ARCH IN LAYERS WITH A LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF 6", MAXIMUM DEPTH 8", THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER. THESE COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. MATERIALS TO COMPLETE THE FILL OVER PIPE SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND INDICATED IN THESE AND THE REFERENCED SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL GRATES (INLET AND CATCH BASIN) SHALL MATCH PAVEMENT/CURB ELEVATIONS AND SHALL BE VANED. 5. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL CONFORM TO WSDOT STANDARD TYPE 1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOLE, INLET, AND CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS. AND PAVING. 7. ALL CATCH BASINS WITH A DEPTH OVER 5.0 FEET TO THE FLOW LINE SHALL BE A TYPE 2 CB. 8. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. 9. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL CATCH BASINS/MANHOLES EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN DEPTH. 10. CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE STANDARD CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATES AND SHALL BE OLYMPIC FOUNDRY OR APPROVED EQUAL 11. ALL STORM DRAIN WORK MUST BE STAKED FOR LINE AND GRADE PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 12. STORM DRAINAGE STUB OUTS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2X4 AND LABELED "STORM". LOCATIONS OF THESE INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE RECORD DRAWINGS AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. 13. STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE PIPE AND CATCH BASINS SHALL BE FLUSHED AND CLEANED PRIOR TO CITY OF EDMONDS ACCEPTANCE. 14. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK PERTAINING TO DRAINAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION. 15. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN. 16. ONE SET OF APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS SHALL BE ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR DRAINAGE INSPECTION. 17. NO PART OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE COVERED, CONCEALED, OR PUT INTO USE UNTIL IT HAS BEEN TESTED, INSPECTED, AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. '18. STENCIL STORM DRAIN GRATES WITH "DUMP NO WASTE, DRAINS TO STREAM". MAINTENANCE OF SILTATION BARRIERS 1. SILTATION BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH z RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. CLOSE ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO THE REPAIR OF DAMAGED BALES, END RUNS AND UNDERCUTTING BENEATH BALES. NECESSARY m REPAIRS TO BARRIERS OR REPLACEMENT OF BALES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED PROMPTLY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE LEVEL OF o DEPOSITION REACHES APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE C/) BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE z STRAW BALE BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO 0 Co CONFORM TO THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. 0 LO w d= o� U p N 1-1 N Co 00 0 , Ln 0 w V) rr w Q2 J Q_ U: \2000212-01\xcov.dwg CITY OF EDMONDS T.E.S.C.P. NOTES 1. ESC Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited: to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours,. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. 2. E�JC; Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two da s from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30�. 3. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC; Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual. 5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigato the effects of increased runoff shall be applied. 6. `Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following: a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Dail,v cleanup and street maintenance. SITE GRADING AND T.E.S.C.P. NOTES 1. ALL SITE WORK MUST COMPLY TO APPENDIX 33 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. (1997 EDITION). 2. THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION. 3. IF CUT AND FILL SLOPES EXCEED A MAXIMUM OF TWO FEET HORIZONTAL TO ONE FOOT VERTICAL, A ROCK OR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL MAY BE REQUIRED. ALL ROCK RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT ARE TO FOLLOW CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A CIVIL ENGINEER EXPERIENCED IN SOILS MECHANICS. 4. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR ALTERED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER TO ENSURE CONTINUING EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. 5. TEMPORARY SILTATION PONDS AND ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS SHALL Br MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE OPERATIONAL, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 6. ALL. D?S'FURBED LAND AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED AS REQUIRED BY THE Ci OF EDMONDS. SEE SHEET C-2 7. WHERE -POSSIBLE, NATURAL VEGETATION WILL BE MAINTAINED FOR SILT COIdTR&, I 8. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. HYDROSEED PREFERRED. 9. THE PUBLIC ROW SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN. TRACKING OF MUD AND/OR DEBRIS FROM THE SITE WILL RESULT IN WORK STOPPAGE. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1. INSTALLATION: THE AREA OF THE ENTRANCE SHOULD BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. THE GRAVEL SHALL BE PLACED TO HE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS. ANY DRAINAGE FACILITIES REQUIRED BECAUSE OF WASHING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLAN. IF WASH RACKS ARE USED, THEY SHOULD BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AGGREGATE: 4" TO 8" CRUSHED ROCK, QUARRY SPALL. 3. ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS: THE AGGREGATE LAYER MUST BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES THICK. IT MUST EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE MUST BE AT LEAST 50 FEET. HYDROSEED. GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE: WILL BE SUBJECT TO A WELL - ESTABLISHED GROUND COVER WHICH FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRESPASS AND TRAMPL!NG BY ERECTING TEMPORARY FENCES, BARRIERS, SIGNS, AND THE LIKE AS REQUIRED. DO NOT WORK IN, OVER, OR ADJACENT TO SEEDED AREAS WITHOUT PROPER PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARDS. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT MOIST UNTIL WELL -ESTABLISHED, AND SHOWING A VIGOROUS, UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS. 3. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES WITHIN THE SITE, OR AFFECTED R.O.W., NOT OTHERWISE COVERED BY BUILDINGS, ASPHALT, GRAVEL, CONCRETE, MULCH, OR OTHER PLAN MATERIAL/LANDSCAPE ITEMS AS INDICATED ON PLANS SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED. HYDROSEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND REQUIiE'MENTS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS. INSTALL SEED, FERTILIZER, AND MULCH FOR HYDROSEED MIX AT THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION RATES: SEED: 4- POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. FERTILIZER: 12 POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. MULCH: 60 POUNDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. JUTE OR EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL REGRADED SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2 1 /2:1, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SLOPE IS SEEDED OR PLANTED. 4. PREPARATION OF SURFACE: ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. THIS MAY BE: ACCOMPLISHED BY DISCING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS. CITY OF EDMONDS T.E.S.C.P. NOTES (continued) 7. Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below. 8. ESC Minimum Requirement Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses. 9. ESC Minimum Requirement - q Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass through a sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Sediment ponds and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMPs intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to ai approved timetable. 10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC Requirement No. 2. 11. ESC Minimum Requirement - Controlling Off -Site Erosion. Properties and water ways downstream from development sites shall be protected from erosion due to increases in the volume, velocity, and peak flow rate of storm water runoff from the project site. 12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All temporary on -site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected velocity of flow from a two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition. Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems. 13. ESC Minimt;m Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized. 15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall discharge into a sediment trap or sediment pond. 16. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on Construction Sites. All pollutants other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of storm water. 17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other appropriate financial instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the approved erosicn and sediment control plan. [Ord. 3013 ? 1, 1995]. EXCAVATION. GRADING. AND FILL 1. EXCAVATION, FILL, AND GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2000 WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, UBC APPENDIX 33, 1997 EDITION, AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. WCRK SHALL PROCEED TO THE FINISHED SURFACES AT THE ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS AND TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN, IF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND ANY CIIANGES REQUIRED SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF RELATED CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT. 3. MATERIALS EXCAVATED IN AREAS REQUIRING CUT GRADING MAY BE USED AS FILL IF THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FILL MATERIAL OUTLINED BELOW. NO BOULDERS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT CHUNKS GREATER THAN 4" IN ITS LARGEST DIMENSION MAY BE USED. , SUCH MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE. 4. AFTER CLEARING & GRUBBING IS COMPLETE, THE GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE PREPARED AS FOLLOWS: A. ALL AREAS TO BE SURFACED WITH PAVEMENT, CONCRETE, WALKS OR STEPS, AND BUILDING SLABS SHALL HAVE THE TOP 12" OF EXISTING SOILS STRIPPED AND RECOMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY DETERMINED BY ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). B. PRIOR TO RECOMPACTION OF THE STRIPPED MATERIAL ALL AREAS SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE OWNER'S CHOICE. ANY AREAS DEEMED UNSUITABLE BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL BE OVEREXCAVATED AND REPLACED WITH COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL AT AN AGREED UNIT PRICE BASED ON TRUCK MEASURE OF REPLACEMENT FILL. 5. IMPORTED FILL SHALL BE FREE -DRAINING GRANULAR MATERIAL WITHOUT ORGANICS, AND SHALL CONFORM TO WSDOT SECTION 9-03.10 FOR GRAVEL BASE, 9-03.14 FOR GRAVEL BORROW, OR ALTERNATE MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING PRIOR TO ITS USE. FILL SHALL HAVE NO MORE THAN 5% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE. 6. SUBMIT SAMPLES OF PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL FOR TESTING FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP PER ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR), PRIOR TO ANY FILLING OR OVEREXCAVATION AND REPLACEMENT. 7. PLACE FILL IN 10" THICK MAXIMUM LIFTS (LOOSE) AND COMPACT TO 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). 8. COMPACT ALL FILL USING SUITABLE COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. 9. ADD MOISTURE TO THE SOILS OR SCARIFY TO DRY SOILS AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOIL AND COMPACTION TESTING IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SOILS MAY ALSO BE TESTED BY OWNER. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP AND RE -COMPACT ALL SOILS NOT MEETING SPECIFIED COMPACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 13. FOR PLACEMENT OF BALLAST, GRAVEL BASE, AND/OR CRUSHED SURFACING BENEATH ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING (ACP), REFER TO THE TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION SHEET C-6. WATER _ DISTRIBUTION / /tea /'\0��/Q� I fE 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND UNDAMAGED. UNLESS OTHERWIS! APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, THE SAME MANUFACTURER OF EACH ITEM SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. CONTRACTORS SHALL FURNISH A WATERTIGHT PLUG OF THE APPROPRIATE SIZE WHICH SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE END OF THE WATER MAIt-"NYTIME WORK IS DELAYED OR- STOPPED. 2. NO CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING MAINS WILL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT BY MEANS OF AN APPROVED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE PRIOR TO SATISFACTORY FLUSHING, TESTING, DISINFECTION, AND RECEIPT OF SATISFACTORY BACTERIOLOGICAL TEST RESULTS. 3. TAPS UP TO 2" ON THE EXISTING MAINS WILL BE DONE BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. LINE SIZES GREATER T{•1XN' 2' SHALL BE DONE BY A QUALIFIED COMPANY WHO SPECIALIZES IN WATER TAPS AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 5. THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING INSPECTOR MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEASE 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE OWNER OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT SHALL NOTIFY UTILITIES OF A PERSON WHO CAN BE CONTACTED REGARDING PROBLEMS DURING CONSTRUCTION ON A 24 HOUR BASIS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE ANY CITY WATER VALVES. ANY WATER OUTAGES MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE PLANNED OUTAGE. SCHEDULED OUTAGES START AT 9 A.M. AND TERMINATE AT 3 P.M. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE PVC CONFORMING WITH ASTM D-3034, SDR 35. PIPE BEDDING SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. 2. SIDE SEWER LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE CAPPED WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG AND SHALL BE MARKED FOR LOCATION WITH A 2"x 4" BOARD, PAINTED WHITE, MARKED "SEWER" AND NOTING THE DEPTH OF THE STUB. 10 GAUGE LOCATOR WIRE IS REQUIRED ON ALL PLASTIC PIPE. 4. ALL TESTING AND CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CITY OF EDMONDS. 5. SEWERS SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. TESTS WILL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 4.0 PSI FOR 15 MINUTES. 6. ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH. WHERE THE EXISTING FOUNDATION IS UNSATISFACTORY IT SHALL BE EXCAVATED BELOW GRADE AND BACKFILLED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. SEWER BEDDING SHALL BE A GRANULAR MATERIAL AND PLACED TO PROPER GRADE AND SHALL PROVIDE UNYIELDING CONTINUOUS SUPPORT FOR THE PIPE. SHEET INDEX: COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES SURVEY (REFERENCE ONLY) DEMOLITION PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLAN DETAILS VICINITY MAP_ N NO SCALE DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: LOTS 23 AND 24 IN BLOCK 1 OF PLAT OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LOTS 17 THROUGH 22 INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 1 OF GEPHART'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED* IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGES(S) 43, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE NORTHEASTERLY 16 FEET OF SAID LOT 17, CONVEYED TO THE TOWN OF EDMONDS FOR PUBLIC ALLEY BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 88 OF DEEDS., PAGE 217. HORIZONTAL DATUM: BASED ON CENTERLINE OF 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, WHICH BEARS N 29'00'00" E ACCORDING TO RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7610250106. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED, AS FOUND ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9407205005. NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRANSFORMER PAD UNDER NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELEVATED PORTION OF BUILDING. ELEVATION = 40.20' SEE DRAWING FOR BENCH MARKS SET FOR SITE USE. AREA: SITE CONTAINS 17,056 SQUARE FEET OR 0.392 ACRES. EDMONDS UTILITY PROVIDERS ELECTRICITY SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT 2320 CALIFORNIA STREET EVERETT, WA. 98201 (425) 783-8300 NATURAL GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY 1700 E. COLLEGE WAY MOUNT VERNON, WA. 98273 (888) 225-5773 (#3) SEWER, WATER AND STORM TELEPHONE CITY OF EDMONDS GTE BUSINESS OFFICE 121 5TH AVE. N. 1800 41 ST STREET EDMONDS, WA. 98020 EVERETT, WA. 98206 (425) 775-2525 (800) 483-5100 „ APPR, OVED FON ZONING CITY OF EDMO DS CONSTfiUCTION 121 5TH AVE. EDMONDS, WA. 98020 (425) 771-02 0 DATE: SITE IS ZONED I "BC" ( COMM UNIW,,12U, MESS - 2000 SHEET C1 OF 7 SHEET C2 OF 7 SHEET C3 OF 7 SHEET C4 OF 7 SHEET C5 OF 7 SHEET C6 OF 7 SHEET C7 OF 7 14 - 9,500 CY CUT - 0.000 CY FILL N 9,500 CY CUT NET CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800- 424- 5555 x O c�D rn "NS S Z It oo Ln :E 4 0 N >_ Nr7Nz V/ LLJ ")O'MX -,30, -(0 Z � 0000 NcoNLil � 0 T x� U 0 L < J Ld Jd V) LLJ co � W Z Q wo 0 �041 /.._ Z a s W o' o o w J_ z�Ln S V) > U rn�o 0¢0 NV)rn M U) z F- w :2 z 2 w o 2 o U � 0 0 U w U � � w U 0- n% �1 o n_ U o wLIJ Ld �Of N .-• O 0 O z _z M U) LLJ F- W O z Lt n- L I 0 O U (f� 0 0 O W o LLJ drawn by checked by PAB TAP ki 3 scale date 1 "=10' 02/12/01 job no. 2000212-- 01 sheet C 1 of C tUMUNUS OFFICE BUILDING LAYERSET: XSUR Plotted: 05/08/01 15: 05 c oNO�\�O O N. a ti ps �G,- Q) i\' ��a� • N �c� �i' N Ste' �06�' �� i33�LS S3VgV�5 ' S o Z�1 C, c° `o N �� > c 1�'IV�� ao�S \` cn (NOliI(INOO 2100d 01 211d3) NcJ\S �0\S U 0 1N3W3AVd i-IVHdSV ry N) o CIA ��ti CD ti �, o 'V '� 0 �Z 0� Cn ��r1� f] o -- -i—G r(C�b Aj ti �o co , ` >1-ldM = 10N00�ti�Jvl� I\iy GX n rti X titi IN ,'-b0'0Zl M u00,00.6 N �'� v E31Nd-ld _�� 3 Ilk �� J 0-6 ll O\ Ocv X N ' _ •�°'�' �'� •c" n ui I can '4,�"�0 1 ,9' L l 13HdVWcl dJIWJOO ki12 Id021d G, cb o co 01 dNno0 io 30 3 S, l l 00 �oX0 l8'6Z = 210033 HSINid SI 2100 '0T18 =_ �Z Ai63dMAcl 30 3 N aO �00 0� I cn Oti SI 2103 a ,� cb' c� z cm� mCv — N �G' X ��\'\\, i_ fC r �G' I O Z O � � � m ------------ -- - - - --------------- - -� -�- <00 9� 3A3�]3HD3 A(g---'JDAS RHO C I _ A j x 3NI-1 J.1213d021d cD (— 30 SI 2103 •00-19 \.�Cfi tz 3N16-V•6Z = KO-13 HSINIA ti O �1213d021d 30 .3.S �� ? I o = <0'6l4 <L-O Sl 2100 -0a-18 "cn �O o G V /6 o�,c �'v g ITi o m ``' — — o�do '�'�, �� '� coo x c�' tir-vx C/Q �, C 0 g �O CO CO dM o `� ca Q C-00'02 __as.,g __....__ _._._.aS N• �`r I p � -u �, � co O c� y vi 0 G ' y0 X A O ✓ ry Gti n ---- z �, , - - c 04' ' �o�d ry C y �o Icf' 0 > �J 00 C, vi c, \✓ y O a CIO oz :` r \✓� N w I — — — — — — — — — -----— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -------- ---------� �l� caIV G n J J r o G� A C �j y�--------- m J O I Cn W ---I ,fi0'OZ l 3 .00,00. L9 S :{ �� D ,'✓ O'l ��, m C, I-------------------------------------------------------------- 7�OJ°v Co�I z cli X I rx o0ss p I �G� •� I W I I 0 ✓ I i' .cG, I J 0 X (0 ^� Gr c) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — °— — — — — — — — — — C, — ' N 00 I � .o' I N 82) I oa G, A, '\ vi I x i I --------------I------------------------------------------------- �� I I co cf) m cvi cn 1 cn am � I °otic ss<.g - SS,,2 - J l I d H (:!) A-:1 I IV � 91 Ni wMaMIL— �.�. \� ''" � •o ZZ 1 �' ��Z �l cn I I�� 0 0 > o � Z II m m o {n n D m 0, Sc, .�s S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. 1 6 J C) s •� u �; �'. � J I '_0 D SET CHISLLtu AT TOp CURB ELE'WION = ASPHALT PAVEMENT (FAIR CONDITION) 55 SECOND AVENUE SOU-1-1-1 C: G ASPHALT PAVEM ) / ( 57 I' -A < 00-) 7 L01 6 _ — - --0 CA —z� - - - -- - -- - e ° °- D ° ° CON RIf E WALK ° CONCRETE DRIVE _ °e ° ° ° D v BEGIN REMOVAL e „ °'L =� OF CURB & \� --- ° ° o e °° p ° e�.� �. GUTTERU��' --- --- -- • - I v p e v e 59. , e / o _ 1 \ / T6 � 0 u� 70 r_q [71 CITY OF EDMONDS FIBER OPTIC CABLE \ O p` r ®. cn A S P I A L T e 30.00' ° n > 0 �✓'� ° o 0 // om 0 \ < -�� \ C, D D \ i 0 1 0 < i% —co o m o � -o o ° - �u Oo z D m e ° (n V ° V V -� 30.00, -O O CO \ co a e D I 0--0-' _. °I-° z to I I I I I I \ I I I Fri oG 6' -0-� .0 \ \ I I I 1 8 PA G SPACES I \_ o �� 9J, ° �+' 59.0' I I I I I I I z o A� — _- co �Lu I ,o 5V) _o J Z O >� � a o w 0 0 N — — — — — — — ©H— — — — —©H= --- — — 6H-T — —S M.07L �, Q „`_S / g 5�------ — ---- v �y O`er �-- o� ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN tiW (GOOD CONDITION)16' ALLEY (PUB[ C) ------____-- '� 2 I � /i\ �` < n �? cS� C) LQ CITY OF EDMONDS FIBER OPTIC 6_ VD, � CABLE o C)_ v) «) (b 1 END REMOVAL OF CURB & GUTTER '-o 0 GRAPH 0 5 10 ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 10 ft. ') LEGEND O TO BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR OTO BE REMOVED BY APPROPRIATE FILTER FABRIC FENCE—�k----�K— UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE BE PROTECTED DURING PROPOSED CONTOUR 1g _T OTO CONSTRUCTION — e EXISTING SPOT GRADE ° ® SAWCUT LINE (SEE SHEETS C5 & C6) SILT COLLAR PROTECTION SEE GRAVEL & WIRE MESHin, — — O SAVE AND RELOCATE FILTER DETAIL _ — DIVERSION DITCH ©TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW CURB, KEYSTONE WALL GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK HAY BALES Cl OCURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED CONTRACTOR NOTES: SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED 1. EXISTING ON -SITE ASPHALT AND CONCRETE 8 AND REPLACED MATERIAL MAY BE RECYCLED AND USED FOR (MATCH AND PROTECT FILL IN AREA SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHINICAL EXIST. CURB) ENGINNER. ALL RECYCLED MATERIAL MUST BE M REDUCED TO 1-1/2 SIZE OR SMALLER. 2. CAP SANITARY SIDE SEWERS AT THE PROPERTY LINE AFTER THE DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDING. CALL FOR INSPECTION (LYLE CHRISMAN, 425-771-0220) PRIOR DEMOLITION NOTES TO BACKFILLING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO DISCONNECTION OF ANY SERVICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND COMPLYING WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. ALL UTILITIES (WITHIN THE PROPERTY) INCLUDING STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS SHALL BE CAPPED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN SERVICE. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PUBLIC SERVICE GAS AND ELECTRIC LINES AND US WEST TELEPHONE LINES. ALL STRUCTURE INCLUDING BASEMENT WALLS AND FLOOR SLABS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. NO EXISTING UTILITY, STRUCTURES OR UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE ABANDONED IN PLACE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ENGINEER, OWNER AND GOVERNING AGENCY. ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, DISPOSAL, HOURS OF OPERATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS FOR SITE DEMOLITION. COST OF ALL PERMITS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT. ALL EXISTING BUSHES, TREES AND TREE ROOTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY DURING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. IT SHALL ALSO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT THE EXISTING STRUCTURES FOR ANY OTHER CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE DEMOLLITION PROCEDURES. ANY CONDITIONS WHICH MAY BE UNCOVERED DURING THE PROCESS OF DEMOLITION SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ADDITIONAL EXPENSES INCURRED BY UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO THE ADDITIONAL WORK. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY FOR THE TYPE AND QUANTITY OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF A BID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE WATER ON SITE FOR DUST ABATEMENT AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL OF ALL DEBRIS. BURNING ON SITE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC UTILITIES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS A RESULT OF THE DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRCTOR. REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE A DAMAGED PARTY. EXISTING WATER LINES SIZE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF SURVEY. WHILE DEMOING AND CAPPING EXISITNG WATER LINES DETERMINE SIZE OF EACH LINE. IF THE ` EXISTING WATER LINES ARE 1-1/2" OR LARGER THEY CAN BE USED TO SERVICE THE PROPOSED BUILDING. IF SMALLER THEY WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONDED AND A NEW DOMESTIC WATER LINE WILL BE REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. w z w o a U 0 v) U } W w U C o w n- w in Ckf 5 1W (/// hJ V z O H zTz I� 1/ V ) � z Q m W z U 0 11 I-- LL_ 0 0 LLJ U) 0 Q z 0 0 i� 0 W o w drown by checked by PAB TAP 7m scalp am dote " 1 =10' 2/12/01 job no. 2000212— 01 sheet C 3 of C U: \2000212-01Vero. dwg J\ (n J CSC Cp �- i" cpn �Cp, - 2 n 1�=S� -1 - �,,!h I A0 J'i o 1 • �r r �� I U�-T kk fill EIa Eq ir,fTFT�lj - '�Fir, it k r� i En ian ra E � p .:F n r�r� R!v �J:, rr• yA o c vp -y i z v �. / k o A\ I:D m v� iW iU Ll 1 i0 �o O :2 0 N o C L6LLJ 0 Of w o / C-4� MIT F 1-2 S- - D I f iILI �� C r 03 r H, ll F �F%K ii-f -uarr , n - -.�.{ g is 4' I h'. .:, .± F.` . �ER��i:"["1��+.nt�."�"• iir .,F ;f...�1:^i'r�i�N e v D e v D � ► b v p � e ° ° _ � — CONCRETE DRIVE ° - CON RETE WALK ° v Rv C e • IN e v / / I ° b ° it a e 0 0 l J v �p m t� D . iv Im N °0 1 D ° 0 e v g v e •, D° .e �o :FF e D l9 pv ° eD ,e ° ° e �g BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION = 19'+ °I COORDINATE WITH ARCH. PANS ° D _ A e 11 ° e 0 e i � v e Tp ° \ / ��rr L+`ii e: ENiii kiktH ul( �Z A o <� --�G—T-0yo W 16' ALLEY (PUBLIC) — — — --S v'007 0 �< <D �\ 'f < To C�\ C-3 7 �i I 0 J rl ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND SHORING WALL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS' CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROPOSED CONTOUR 18 INLET PROTECTION FILTER DETAIL 0 CONTRACTOR NOTES: 1. EXISTING ON -SITE ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MATERIAL MAY BE RECYCLED AN USED FOR FILL IN AREA SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHINICAL ENGINNER. ALL RECYCLED MATERIAL MUST BE REDUCED TO 1-1/2" SIZE OR SMALLER. 2. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DEPLICTS THE MINIMUM EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED. 3. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL. AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR SHORING DETAILS. 4. ALL DEWATERING SHALL BE TREATED WITH A BAKER TANK SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. R = 25' MIN -I _.wt 00. �y INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT IF THERE IS A ROADSIDE DITCH PRESENT, AS PER SNOHOMISH COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS 4"-8" QUARRY SPALLS ' GEOTEXTILE 12" MIN. THICKNESS PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 1. QUARRY SPALLS (OR HOG FUEL) SHALL BE ADDED IF THE PAD IS NO LONGER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. ! n 2. IF THE ENTRANCE IS NOT PREVENTING SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT, THEN z ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO KEEP THE STREETS FREE OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE USED. THIS MAY INCLUDE Q Z STREET SWEEPING, AN INCREASE IN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE ENTRANCE, OR THE INSTALLATION OF A WHEEL WASH. IF WASHING IS USED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA COVERED WITH CRUSHED ROCK, __I Q AND WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. 3. ANY SEDIMENT THAT IS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY SWEEPING. BY SWEEPING PAVEMENT 0 THE SEDIMENT COLLECTED SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON -SITE. THE SHALL NOT BE CLEANED BY WASHING DOWN THE STREET, EXCEPT WHEN SWEEPING IS INEFFECTIVE AND THERE IS A THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO WASH THE STREET, THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SMALL SUMP SHALL BE CONSIDERED. THE SEDIMENT WOULD THEN BE WASHED INTO THE SUMP. h J n 4. ANY ROCK SPALLS THAT ARE LOOSENED FROM THE PAD AND END UP ON THE ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 5. IF VEHICLES ARE ENTERING OR EXITING THE SITE AT POINTS OTHER THAN THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S), 1 FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO CONTROL TRAFFIC. �J I-1— 0 STABILIZED CONSTRUC110 ENTRANCE 0 NO SCALE O 0 1Llj 1 V ! O� OO z O ,00 - � O F— W H z w O o C) F}- v LLJ U } 0� 0w Q oa w U) w in cr_ > 0 Cn PLACE 3 ft SQUARE (f) OF FILTER = z FABRIC MATERIAL ABOVE GRATE & (/) O SECURE WITH GRAVEL DAM OR AS W ::E l-. IN. REPLACE UPON FIRST SIGNS NILURE,. SILT CONTROL AT C.B.'S S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. z J m W C) J� L 0 V) 7 = Z O �} t :2 O D Ow L6 o� 0 O N N 00 0 0 O 0 w V) o W ++ Q O J d U: \2000212-01 \xgrd.dwg SET CHISELtu „ AT TOP CURB Et_EVATION = 22.01 SECOND AVENUE SOU TEI CITY OF EDMONDS FIBER OPTIC CABLE i U 0 0 <<� G� IP q2) LEGEN D 8.50 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE PROPOSED CONTOUR —10 EXISTING CONTOUR i RIDGE LINE R — .CGS' INC EXIST. SPOT GRADE FINISH GRADE AT rn t- B. W BOTTOM OF WALL O 'H5o0 FINISH GRADE AT T.W. TOP OF WALL NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING CAR RAMP GRADING AND BASEMENT FLOOR GRADING. FOUNDATION DRAINS WILL BE DIRECTED TO A SUMP PUMP. REFERENCE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION. GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 10 ft. 40 ZItoou2g V) �� O CU I I t7Lr)V')Z w 01-�Lli V)MM= V > 2O o 000 N N 0 �x_I C) Q w J (J) 0 W a Lj Z wo as Z LLJ . an 0 (n _I U Z n j' rn�0 0Q.- N(w� to E- z w z w z O o v t0 �tj O V W 0 0_ O Ld W 0_ V) w w to W 5 swim II 0 o Z z D z m Q -� LIJ °- U 0 LL z 11 O a- o r) z O O Ld o W sheet C 5 of C / S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. t �� SO Z, �. W/ SOLI LOCKING LID TE= 23.0 IE=15.3 STEPS T I BE POLYPROLENE I 0 Z- CD 7� J � m �a �A w U 0 V) Z 0 L0 l� L6 J '— t— r-- D O N '--1 N 00 00 O , L0 O w V) -o w 41 >--,-, _o J 0- U: \2000212-01 \xgrd.dwg 0, SET CHISELLU qT TOP CURB ELEVATION = 22.01 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH LEGEND: C CONCRETE PIPE CB CATCH BASIN CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE E ELECTRICAL LINE G GAS MAIN IE INVERT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD LINE SD STORM DRAIN LINE SDMN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SS SANITARY SEWER LINE SMIi SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T TELEPHONE LINE UG UNDERGROUND LINE (R) RECORD DATA GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 10 ft. GENERAL _NOTES: THIS PLAN SHEET IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW ALL ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND THE FOLLOWING CIVIL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS. SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. PROPOSED SEWER ACCESS POINTS (MANHOLES) AND WATER LINE ANGLE POINT LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. ALL SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35, WITH RING TITE JOINTS. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE COPPER, TYPE K OR POLYETHYLENE (PE) SDR-7—PE 3408, AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D2239-81. PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM PRESSURES ALLOWED BY THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. DRAINAGE SYSTEM INFORMATION CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. PROPOSED CATCH BASIN LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. DETENTION SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, FRAMES, GRATES, MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. NOTE: FLOOR DRAINS IN THE BASEMENT SHALL TIGHTLINE TO THE PROPOSED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE DISCHARGING TO THE SANITARY SEWER. SEE DETAILS FOR OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. FOUNDATION DRAINS WILL BE DIRECTED TO A SUMP PUMP PER FUTURE DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFERENCE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION. PIPING INTO THE STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT WILL BE DESIGNED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER. , ALL PVC PIPE PENETRATIONS INTO THE VAULT AND MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A SAND COLLAR. WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PER LS DESIGN. ® IF EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE IS NOT 1-1/2" A NEW WATER MAIN MUST BE INSTALLED. O QO 4�U �O N V Cn o`% 47 z �.� V) d a0LO� 't O rM 0 r a F, U Of I Id ^ WLv p >— t Lb to 7- NMN= r)rnMg�op V > c 0, -,3 z 0000 C,400NII V7 '- — x X Q ~ Z Q J w (/) Ld Ljj z W 0 as Z LtJ rr o Zto �L ^ 3 V? J U :2w� rn�o 0 ¢ .— N(wrnt m z 0 0 01) •t < I I a L0 I It z V) W � � z W z 5_ 0 U � � 0 H U U W U CL ry 0 W WILV) 0 w in > W NI.-1 z 0 z O O z D m z J L>v l2 0 i— LL I— LL _J I— Q 0 V) 0 0 O Ld o Ld sheet C 6 of C / S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. FRAME & LADDER CLEANOUT GATE: SHEAR GATE 0 CV VAULT ACCESS POINT REMOVABLE WATER— TIGHT COUPLING 6' MAX. 12" MIN PLATE WITH ORIFICE AS SPECIFIED, BOLTED TO FLANGE OR DRILLED CAP i— OVERFLOW=23.00 1-1.45"0 ORIFICE IE=21.88 PIPE SUPPORTS (2 MIN.): 3" x .090" ALUMINUM W/ 5/8" STAINLESS BOLTS —1-15"0 RISER TEE $ 0 OUTLET 9/16"0 ORIFICE IE=17.78 IE=17.78 RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ 0.73"0 [�I IE=15.78 ORIFICE (SHARP EDGE). ORIFICE SHALL BE SHOP DRILLED, NOT CUT. RESTRICTOR TEE N.T.S. VAULT SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE DESIGNED & STAMPED BY A PROFESSIONAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. z•.•,•.•,•.•.•.•.' -• a 1 J J ....... � m U J w J 0 Ln o TTT 11= -J z O ��:2 00 Lo Job w CD p CV \ N 00 O O O Ln F o w U) ri m a� w 4� Q o U: \2000212-01 \xcov.dwg CEILING EL=24.00 EMER OVERFLOW FF- TE=25.04 W.S. EL= 23.5 1.5'IMIN.''' '2.4' MA 1 r ' LID ----------------- -------------- OVERFLOW ELEV = 23.00 POLYPROPYLENE LADDER 5.22' STORAGE SECTION A -A N.T.S. ORIFICE (TYE.) N.T.S. BOLT LOCKING RING & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" 5' FREEBOARD RESTRICTOR TEE SEE DETAIL, LEFT. 8" OUTLET IE=17.78 FF EL=17.78 2" COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS "B" ACP 4" COMPACTED DEPTH, CRUSHED SURFACING, TOP COURSE (CSTC) 6 COMPACTED DEPTH GRAVEL BORROW OR EXISTING MATERIAL, AS DETERMINED BY ON -SITE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. REMOVE DELETARIOUS MATERIAL AND COMPACT AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BY ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. GUTTER DETAIL N.T.S. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLAN FOR INPUT PIPE 24" DIAMETER A CLEAR ACCESS W/LADDER 22.00' 8" OUTLET IE=17.78 SEE VAULT CONTROL T — I / ' TEE DETAIL. I DETENTION VAULT SCALE: 1 "=10' CURB do GUTTER- ?0 1 70. O" Mq �FsiO ►. NOTES: 1. IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS �� 9Rgc Fj 15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH F� EXPANSION JOINT. 2. DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON 2" OF 5/8" CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 3000PSI CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK. FORM INSPECTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO POUR. �e 1/2" UP CONCRETE CURB v\v \v\� AND GUTTER �� OP 'CH�q�,gT p ROpFR FRM��FO 9y- 0 FgcF T OQ n3- FNc/NFF EXPANSION R JOINT EXPANSION JOINT oQ� SEE TRANSITION DETAIL, BELOW- 5' EXPANSION 1/2" UP JOINT 1:10 SLOPE 6" CURB DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITION DETAIL FOR CURB AND GUTTER 7' r- EXPANSION JOINT A. • • •. j ��\ �\jam 6" CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY COMPACTED SUBGRADE SECTION B-B NO SCALE IVEWAY, CURB GU N.T.S. NOTES ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 1. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2000 WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD POSSESS AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THESE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PAVING WORK SHALL CONSIST OF NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (ACP) AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. 3. ALL EDGES OF EXISTING ACP SHALL BE SAWCUT TO PROVIDE FOR NEAT JOINTS WITH NEW ASPHALT OR OTHER SURFACES WHERE NEW GRADES MEET EXISTING. REMOVED ASPHALT CHUNKS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE IN AN APPROVED MANNER, OR BROKEN INTO PIECES WITH 4" MAXIMUM DIMENSION AND COMPACTED WITHIN THE FILL GREATER THAN 6" BELOW SUBGRADE. 4. CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE FURNISHED AND PLACED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE MATERIALS, METHODS, AND TOLERANCES OF THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 5- 04.1 THROUGH 5-04.3(21). FINAL COMPACTED DEPTH OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" OR AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1. PAINT STRIPPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS INDICATED ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND DETAILS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PAINTED STRIPES SHALL BE 4" IN WIDTH. 3. STRIPING PAINT SHALL BE AS LISTED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS, OR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN EQUAL APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. SHERWIN -WILLIAMS PRO -MAR TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT WHITE B29 W 1 YELLOW B29 Y 2 OR PRESERVATIVE TRAFFIC PAINT OR NORTON/MORRIS APPLICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. 4. PAINT STRIPES FOR HANDICAPPED STALLS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE CURRENT CITY AND STATE BARRIER FREE CODE PROVISIONS AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. Z 4n o 0 V) �0- r- 0 roLnMZ 0 > opoo N00NLL- �Ivz X 3 ♦ Q Lu 3 J Cks ® Q Lv z wo z Ld m N 0 3: 5; �w� f A V i U N rn�o NV)rn MD W Q� co -t Lo z w 7 w U o U � � U 5 F- U wLa U }. � Fv- w ILcy o w LJ (L V) o ww Of V) � z o z z Q J m (J W U Q � �- - LLJ LL- 0 Q V) 0 z 0 CJ o W Z 0 w ,: ._r :, ...: .. . ,.. t .. .. .. .. .. � �.. .. ., r , . _ .: _ .. _ _ _ .' :. . � .- .: .. .. �.. - .. � , .. .. .. LEOEMD CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL, SEE STRUCT. FOR THICKNES 777777777 8' CMU WALL W/ VOIDS FILLED W/ GRANULAR INSULATION --- -w-- NONRATED EXTERIOR WALL: VAPOR RETARDER, R-II BAT INSULATION, 4' METAL STUD, 5/8 EXTERIOR GRADE GWB, BUILDING PAPER, EXTERIOR FINISH (METAL SIDING OR EIF PER ELEVATION 1-HOUR RATED EXTERIOR WALL: 5/8 TYPE 'X' GWB, VAPO RETARDER, R-II BATT INSULATION, 4' METAL STUD, 5/8 EXTERIOR GRADE TYPE 'X' GWB, BUILDING PAPER, EXTERIOR FINISH (METAL SIDING OR EIFS) PER ELEVATION NON -RATED INTERIOR WALL: 5/8 GWB, 3-1/2' METAL STUD, (NO GWB TENANT SIDE) - USE M.R. GWB AT INTERIOR OF RESTROOMS NON -RATED INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL: 5/6 TYPE 'X' M.R.GWB, 8' METAL STUD, 5/6' TYPE 'X' M.R.GWB, FINISH PER INTERIOR ELEVATION, SOUND BATTS IN EACH STUD SPACE. USE ADEQUATE BLOCKING AT ALL FIXTURE AREAS, SON -RATED INTERIOR WALL: 4' METAL STUD, 5/8' GWB, FINI PER INTERIOR ELEVATION, ALIGN OUTSIDE FACE OF GWB W ADJ. ELEVATOR SHAFT FINISH I -HOUR RATED INTERIOR WALL: 5/8' TYPE 'X' GWB, 3-1/2' METAL STUD 016' ac., 5/8' TYPE 'X' GUB I -HOUR RATED SHAFT WALL: I' TYPE 'X' GYPSUM SHAFT LINER, 2-1/2' -1- OR 'C-H' STUD, 5/6' TYPE 'X' GWB, ALIGN INSIDE FACE OF SHAFT LINER WITH FACE OF CMU BELOW INSULATED FURRING: EXTERIOR WALL, 3-1/2' METAL STUD Q 16' ac., R-11 INSULATION, VAPOR RETARDER, 5/8' TYPE 'X' GWB ® EXIT SIGN C GHT FIXTURE SEE SHEET A2.1 F R ADDITIONAL SPACING REQ. NORTH WALL OF BUILDING MUST BE I HR. FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION W/ NO OPENINGS NOTES: ALLINING CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 6'-0' INTO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, ALSO SEE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. SEPARATE ENCROACHMENT AND BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH AWNING, S T I 140140 16'-4' I 2i'-5" I 13'-I" 1 26'-lo" 13'-�" I 26'-11" I 161-41 I -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I I I I I I I I I_ _ _ - ----- �- - - I_ -- , - - - - - I- - - - - - - -- - - - I A. PM o LOCH ALLEY I 1 81-O, II -3N 9 -4"9 JI -0 /2N 4'-21 ,16'-0" 5'-V 8'-4" 4'-, " 12'-4' A <35.86' W I I 3N, 11 9.4 I 4' A93 I I <30. 1 NO VEHICULAR ( DUMPSTER I 3 I +2'-11' AFF I ®° I I I I 1 FURRING AT CONC. WALL ONLY I I ACCESS PERMITTED +3'_p AFF i I I UP 1 I I I HR INSUL I I a 1 9.4 I CMU WALL s) 1 I I I 6 I 12'-OI/2 1 I I0,7 � I P Q 1 @ m @ cv cv i I _ 2 ul - - — - — - — - — - — - —13 $s I d —� - O I I 1 A92 t5. ® I I <t I I 2 I 1 I 1 A4.1 I SOFFI ZOVE +9'-6 AFF 1 I I I I I I I 4'-4' 5'-111/2' 2 5H � II 1 I I I I I - I -1 r 11i (p 50'X31' ID INAPT I HR INTERI R WALL I I ( I CL 1it I I I I A I I Z -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-3 I " PROPOSED CLR OFFICE I I �1' -7" I I SPICE �e � Lp I I I I I i 00 I I I MEN I 0 0 - r- I STRUCK. E(zACING I I 1 m +0'-0' 1 I I REFERENCE DATUM I I I 1 FINISH FLOOR I ELEVATION = 0,00' 3023' - ACTUAL ELEVATION I UNSEALED CONCRETE AREA=15b18 SF I I FLOOR O t 1 I I I ®.D. I ®A• I I I O I A -jailI I 4 1 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -+- - --- - - - - - - - - O '� i 01 4 O 11 14 �o I -I5 I ? O ho I I I I I 1 a p —•• Z I —/ I � I I I I w I "'- 102 ALIGN INSIDE �,` I 1 I 1 W/ SN -3 2 1 p r AL�C�N BELOW // 4 I p 1 c!� PLATFORM 1 1.4'-I1` 101 Y I'-0' AFF � I I I p i �- �� EDGE OF ``� FACTORY PRIMED P LOWS —� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o �11 � - - - � - s�>� t=ut�rl-- - - � - 45.0 EIFS FINISH 90.0° 6 4'-4" I I II I4 A I I I I TO BE FURRED I 12 1 I I I A$ PART OF A4.1 I 1 I � j/2 31 I TENANT IMPRVMNt. li 4'-3' CONC. TOPPING O R �s I I I � I_ U/P OVER SLAB. TYP. � I , 10 A I I I o AIR SUPPLY 69.3* 9.3° I �D� OF ' i I 24'X38' GRATING TO BASMNT I I SHAFT o BSMNT ` I p \12 I L R ABOVE _ , 2 I I FDc ' 5 0 9010 SCULPTURE mrL QJ PIV , FLOOR ABOVE BY @ 1 o e o _ - o 0 o FD, TENANT MEN Mz-��u in I I I - i � �''�:rz,N��i�ii � ��ii��`ii�iii�i. �:�11irr•A--•- �iiii�iiii-iiriiiiii■iiiiii�i . MEN da `B. a'Ea ®el <2 B.15' 25.6 v J ' ' ' I 3 'XaJ6 I 5 I I 4 I I v B IJJJ J-I--, — ' JJJJ J� JJJ v ABOVE GRATE /TRE 9.4 9.4 51 EWALK ' .,< IL - SEE LA DSC PE \z1SIDEWALK q cn omp 012301 0 0 END] o 3'-0 1/2' 201-0' 20'-01 34'-5" 3'-11 '-I" '-O 1'-0 1/2' 38'-3" 20'-O' V-1 1/2' 24' -0' 34' -3' 01 141' - 0 2ND AVENUE SOUTH - - - ----q--- - - - - - - - r lu I I I 30I -ON UJI Ll CV c�1 (y D CIA I I M � I M I� g 1210 ' I�Cv"V N I� 1� 1 CV I w Q 1'-0" I I i — I B I LI SLOPE LL tQ LLLL L " LLLLI:I2.LLLL — LLLLLLLLLL @ n i[1 Llr�ti\1 I I � I I A I ' 5'-0' '-Ip" 5'-0RAMP KEY NOTES 12' WIDE TACTILE WARNING STRIPI 15'-0" A B TRACTION GRID ON CENTER ANCISIDE RAMPS, 251_�N SEE CITY OF EDMONDS RAMP D TAIL DUG E224. NOTES I. TENANT IMPROVEMENT DESIGN TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE APPLICATION. 2. NO ELECTRIC RESISTANCE HEATING IS ALLOWED IN THIS BUILDING. 3. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR COLUMN LOCATIONS, TYP. PLAN NORTH lJ Njl5 [FDO n pL�G-ilUV SCALE: 1/8'= I'-0' SAWCUT JOINT BETWEEN EXIST. SI EWALK 4 RAMP IF REQ'D. INSTALL 1/2' EXPANSI N JOINT MATERIAL t EXTEND To STREET EDGE OF UTTER RAMP GENERAL NOTES: A. At LOCATIONS WHERE NEW RAMPS ABUTT EXISTING CU , GETTERS, PLANTER STRIPS, AND SIDEWALKS, CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES, , 2. ALL CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINI H. B-CMCRETI vA'AZL-BE-5FRA'E 7 0TF-A-CLEARPOCINQ-OR — $HALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST FOR 12 HOURS, 4. REFER TO CITY OF EDMOND$ STANDARD DETAIL FOR �URB RAMP TYPE 3 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 0 a 0 0 0 0 I � . } Ij a l?. I.4� 2 PPELOPklENT S= IF(VICES CTR. CITY CC EDIW,00S DRAWN KLW CHECKED RAK DATE 02-12-01 - BUILDING PERM SCALE As noted JOB NO. 0009 A2.2 FILE: 0009-1ST 12 A- TYP. ELEVATOR . . . . . . $HAFT ABOVE ROOF BEYOND -- ----------- ; ki Al I I <9> chi 30,23' - 1st FLOOR LEVEL , +0'-0'REFERENCr- DATUM ............ ............ ............ 4. METAL SIDING, TYP. EIFS, TYP. 12 4 IF$12 7 12 8 TYP. TYP. TYP, 4'x4' GUTTER 135 - — - — - — - . . . . . . TYP. roo.l(o 3 ...... ..... ........ ........ ... ............ .... ... ...... BASEBASEROOF LIMIT ... ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ .. ........ ....... ...... . 77 ...... .. ROOF LOW POINT X A03 ...... .. ......... ... ............ 2nd FLOOR LEVEL LL L ............................ ....... .... .......... ....... ... ....... ........ ........ .. . . .... ... .. ................................ ....... I ..................... ......... .... ... .......... ..... ........ `T- ........... .. .............. I ...................... ....... .... ................... ..... ............ ...................... .... . ............ ............ ................................. .... ........... .......................... ... . //;�l -I .... 1. .. ................................ .... ... ... .... ........ . . ... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. ... ....... JL. -lest FLOO R LEVEL A 01 REFERENCEDATUM ............. .. .... ........ .......... ....... ............ ... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... 30,1(0 ---------- v 14VERAGE GRADE 'SEPARATE E3UiLr)NG 4 EIFS REVEAL, TYP ENCROACHMENT P�FIHIT6. BA,4E ARE REQUIRED POP, AWNINGS PLANTER C;ONC. PARKING LE TYP. TYP. L WEST ELE:VA 10 SCALE., 116'4-0' A B. 12 12 D 12 E F 4'x4' GUTTER. _3� aB r— TYP. TYP. TYP. - --------------- (00,16 12 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. MODULATIONBC7NUS ............................. ........................ .1(0 ........... ........... ..... ..... ........... ROOF ........... ........... BASE ROOF LIMIT ........... .......... ........... ......... ..... ..... LOW POINT .......... SEE AIMING NOTE ABOVE ;; O :: O 4E- OE OG. ... ....... ........... 2 In oll L -- - ------ ........ ..... . .... LEVEL .......... .......... 7 ............. ....... ....... ..... .. . . . . . . . ...... ............ ........... ... ......... ............ ........... ... ............ .. ............... .. ............ ....................................... ........... .......... ......... .................... ...................... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71- . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � ......... /\ .'. ``I "It 0-23' 16t FLOOR LEVEL ... ......... -- . — --Q� �+V-0' REFERENCE DATUM N .,. i O ... .. O /> OEI ............ ............................................... ............ ......... ... . ........ ........... .............. .......... ....................... ............................... .......................... .. 30.161 AVERAGE GRADE .......... CONC. REVEAL SEE DETAILS ALIGN WITH EIFS REVEALS PARKING LEVEL OUTH ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 116"=1'-0- 4'x4' PREFAB. GALv. MTL. FLASHING - ANODIZE[) ALUM. -SECTION SWT. MTL. GUTTER MATCH SIDING COLOR 4 3 2 12 H 3(o STEEL SIDING z 12 12 3.5 F—1CI: L(Lu TYP. 3-1 TYP, TYP. — — 00.10-- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------ LINE OFROOF5EYC-ND ...........-AROF ' n- ---------- =1 Y1111-loll Illlk�ol�� . . . . . . . .... 1111 I 11 11 ill I I PARKING LEVEL o F-dt-11 liuu ............... 5A5E ROOF LIMIT ............... ............................ O . ......... ........................... Ll ........ ........... ....... ....... ..... ........ 2nd FLOOR LEVEL ....... . ...... ...... ....... ...................................... ................. .................... ....... ..................... ........ ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ......... ....... ...... ....... ...... ........ . .................... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... .................. .... , ... ....... ...................................... ........ ..................................... ...... ...................... ............... ....... ..... ........ .......... -.7-777 -t 30.23 1st FLOOR LEVEL :z 0- LL > PROTECTORS +0'-0' REFERENCE DATUM TYP. I 30.16I AVERAGE GRADE NOTE: 1. FOR WINDOW TYPES/LAYOUT, SEE All 2. FOR EIFS REVEALS, TYP- SEE 15/AS2 A) N < uj z rx 0 z CL a. b jR a = ' ce djuip w w (L < o U(?- LL i 6rcich Krb'e'se gm Arch.1t6dPr. I ro IAIM bFftt 603 STEWART STREET SUITE 707 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 0101 (206) 624 - 3210' - FAX 624 - 3243 VENATCH QE�IqE 272 ROLLING HILLS LANE (509) 664 - 5181 FAX 665-8750 z cl US IMAM Lu F— Z Q cf. LL "q :� LL 0 Z cf cl) c LLJ z ::� Z-1 Ll 0 Lu FA' C AUG 2 G DEVELOPMENT SE5viCES CTR. CITY Or- EDMONDS JOB NO. 0009 FILE: 0009ELEV AU UG 2 0 '120 0 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 23, TVVP. 27 N., RGE. 3 . E., W.M. ' LL y s SCE 92 cp, J nZ 24'C SD 12"SS MANHOLE TYPE II - SADDLE (SEE .DETAIL) W/ SOLID LOCKING LID TE=20.2f IE=14.67 O-A STEPS TO BE POLYPROLENE Ns l Qn REMOVE EXIS INE' 0 ---d(Tj S❑LID LOCKING COVER MARI ADJUSTMENT SECTION (LEVELING BRICKS OR GRADE RINGS ❑PTIONA 46' DIA ,.°-HANDHOLDS POLYPROLENE STEPS LEGEND: SECOND 1 t-1 AAWFriHE o -Lfl SD STORM DRAIN LINE " ® " ® SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 1NFIREHYD. ASS-Y. W/4" STORZ ADAPTER ss SANITARY SEWER LINE 1-8 x6��TEE (FLxFLxFL) 2-8 GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) 1-6" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) i 1-8N4" TEE (MJxFL) SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (RESILIENT TYPE) 1 4 GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) 2-8" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) 43LF-4" D.I.P. T TELEPHONE LINE (RESILIENT TYPE) 1—CONC. BLOCK 8LF-6" D.I.P. I UG UNDERGROUND LINE (R) RECORD DATA L-0@ „ 12"SD —� — — — — TAP INTO EiISTING WATER �ZO v' IF POSSIBLE REUSE y 6' EXISTING METER IF O IE @BLD „POSSIBLE 15.4 _ - 400 MANHOLE FYPE II W/ SOLID OCKING LID TE=23.13 IE=14.9 (a I -built elev.) STEPS TO E POLYPROLENE 'DRAIN' I ''• PRECAST RISER SEC NS LADDER 12'�A IN I I SEE NOTE 7 i----SLOPE = 1/2'/FT (TYf) CONSTRUCT IN FIE e" •''' CHANNEL AND SHE TO THE N❑N-SHRINK °" ' CROWN OF THE PI . GROUT .:, ..�. PRECAST BASE WITH I INTEGRAL RISE • n 48• DIA-6.� 6'm � SEPARATE CAST IN PLACE REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SEPARATE BASE ONLY) 0.23 SQ. IN/FT IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 48' DIA. NOTES 1. MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHT❑ M-199 (ASTM C 478) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL REINFORCED CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE CL. 4000. NON -REINFORCED CONCRETE IN CHANNEL AND SHELF SHALL BE CL. 3000. 3. KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS 6'. MAXIMUM HOLE SIZE IS 36' FOR 48' MANHOLE. DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8' MIN, 4. ALL BASE REINF❑RCING STEEL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 60,000 PSI AND BE PLACED IN THE UPPER HALF OF THE BASE WITH V MIN, CLEARANCE, 5. SEE THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR J❑INT REQUIREMENTS, 6. MANHOLE COVERS SHALL SOLID LOCKING LID, 7. SAW CUT AND REF❑VE PIPE AFTER H NNEL HAS CURED. MANHOLE - TYPE 11 �� 48"SADDLE MANHOLE n 0� �, I: \2000212-01 \xgrd.dwg C CONCRETE PIPE CB CATCH BASIN CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE E ELECTRICAL LINE G GAS MAIN IE INVERT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD LINE A .s. P.p ..,s ♦ D ` v > v .. > o •:.IN4 GA v •,— ♦' • s s•' .O .° • S.• '4— sL. �� '� ice. —►,ate s D .- D . `. ° ••O 1 o FE VA _ D. .o ° ; > •p,♦. s.• ° a v ♦ Ds• a s. LV�"'( xt�J :. ° R►.. ° ' ^ °. ° ' g.. ♦�D GRAPHIC SCALE v'WATER.n s ? 'D v •. D. ..: ° s v'I �C v s I I ° °.: .vs... ♦ ,•`� ° 'F •� • P Po s'' :s• 10 0 5 10 20 40 •. A D . — —TrRp— — — -p — — — ,♦ ° • LNYN31 O 9 3aftldd-IROS , TOP OF VAULT LID D \ IN FEET 1 Inch ft. 10 > O = 24 O 1 O ELECTRICAL 99.17' CTR/CTR 7, 8" SD C� 2.00% / ELV OUT =17.28 x CLOSIT _ s ,D • • Mal mom PROP. 25—SA - / o.• ° \ OIL/WATER SPRINKER7z �� / ' \ \ BY USEPATILITY VAULT / /" ATOR Roof / GENERAL NOTES: \ COMPANY OR / / / 8 FLAP GATE DDCV � / / THIS PLAN SHEET IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS TO BE Af PROVED BIKE / CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW ALL EQU�/�QLENT O RACK ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND THE FLOOR DRAIN (TYP.) \ \ \ / / / / I FOLLOWING CIVIL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS \ SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION: 0— / \ CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH I EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. PROANGLE POINT LOCATIONS ARE SED SEWER- ACCESS POINTS (MANHOLES) AND WATER LINE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE \ V) INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR °'' • '' / / \ \ / / \ \ SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. ALL SEWER J) AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE /CIF \ -0"''`` / \ I INDICATED, ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) D - , WITH RING TITE JOINTS. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE / SHALL BE COPPER, TYPE K OR POLYETHYLENE (PE) SDR-7—PE ..------------------— — — — — — — — — — --- d�,------- 3408, AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D2239-81. PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM \\ // O PRESSURES ALLOWED BY THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. \ FLOOR DRAIN LINES / \ / ' i \ (TYP.) REFER TO / \ '• / \ / MECHANICAL PLANS DRAINAGE SYSTEM INFORMATION \ / / \ / FT] BASNENT PARKING EVEL \ / CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH \ / \ EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXIST. \ / EEVATION 19.9/ \ / PROPOSED CATCH BASIN LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY REQUIRE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER OF CONFLICTS ENCOUNTERED. DETENTION SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, FRAMES, GRATES, MATERIALS ' 1 E3 E3 AND INSTALLATION METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF O EDMONDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. FLOOR DRAINS IN THE BASEMENT SHALL TIGHTLINE TO THE PROPOSED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE DISCHARGING TO THE SANITARY SEWER. SEE DETAILS FOR OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. o D b, FOUNDATION DRAINS WILL BE DIRECTED TO A SUMP PUMP PER FUTURE DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFERENCE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION. PIPING INTO THE STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT WILL BE DES \ IGNED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER. ALL PVC PIPE PENETRATIONS INTO THE VAULT AND MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A SAND COLLAR. e / DUMP 3TER \ / \ WATER .METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PER LS DESIGN: .pq „ ............ s IF EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE IS NOT 1-1/2" A NEW WATER MAIN MUST BE INSTALLED. -,, no- - q n n n EM ffrDn nr-P)n nP ti �9 91 z 8Y gj,-v 4*;3 RECEIVED OCT 192001 BUILDING DEPT. 3 �Uo LLJ I:. QjLL 0- `��5► N� dp� ul 'Nsn� • yV L c�}}• �tOMp - to C) w V ♦ NMN= t)0)MEr I 0 -3 A z � 0000 �c0 vLL z V xJ LL- < ~ Q W J Jd v) W z WC 0 �' z Q LtJ J W 55 Z�� ••w 0 NCrn m nW h o 00 � ,n d• a R wF w w z w w o 0 J 5-0) La U U w w L) a(Lcr_ w C)0- LLI rn V o W W � W Ll)N �- Z 0 z H z z a V) W z Q LIv IZ U 0 I— V) M z 0 0 0 Z W o Ld drawn by checked by PAB TAP scale date 1 "=10' 2/12/01 job no. 2000212— 01 C v C sheet of