Loading...
Attachment 19 - Public CommentsMy name is Blair Bernson. I am a resident at Point Edwards and offer some comments on the Point Edwards Homeowners Association, Permit Type III -A; Variance for Ongoing and Single -Event Landscape Maintenance on a Geologically Sensitive Critical Slope. I have no background in geotechnical matters but do have significant background and experience in one area of possible concern for the project. That area relates to birds and how the project might affect birdlife. Some background. I am an avid birder and have been birding locally, nationally and internationally for 50 years. I am a member of Pilchuck Audubon, the Washington Ornithological Society and the American Birding Association and a Master Birder under that Program through the Seattle Audubon Society. I have led many field trips, including for Edmonds Birdfest and have been a program speaker for many programs at Point Edwards and a half dozen birding groups — primarily in Washington. None of that makes me a professional ornithologist but I have thousands of hours of experience in the field including specifically many hours birding on and near the Point Edwards property including the Edmonds Marsh, the Willow Creek Fish Hatchery and the Union Oil property. All of these areas are interrelated and important to me. I have had an opportunity to review the permit application and supporting materials and have a good sense of how the Point Edwards HOA and its Landscape Manager, Bel Johnson, attend to projects and maintenance at Point Edwards. This is important because it is not just the planning but also the execution that determines the success of a project. Setting the proper goals is of course critical, but reaching and retaining them is what really makes a difference. Bel and her team are committed to that and are excellent. Any time trees and other plants are removed or pruned, there is going to be some impact and the potential for harm to a habitat, an environment. However, there is also the opportunity for improvement. I just returned from a birding trip with friends in the Walla Walla area where among other things, we observed several mitigation projects they had been involved with, where slope, drainage and reforestation remediation had significantly enhanced habitat and wildlife in addition to stabilizing erosion, streambanks and also providing an improved aesthetic. These were multi -acre projects but involve the same issues and opportunities involved in the Point Edwards Project. The key was ongoing consideration of the need for bank and slope stabilization coupled with careful protection of the better existing vegetation (trees and shrubs and grasses), the removal of harmful or endangered ones, and their replacement with native and diverse vegetation. This latter point is critical and should be and is a part of the Point Edwards planning. On Sunday I walked and birded the area in question at Point Edwards as well as the neighboring Union Oil site. While the existing vegetation (again trees, shrubs and grasses) does provide habitat for some bird life, it could be significantly improved with appropriate removal and replacement emphasizing more native and natural and more diverse species. And it is apparent that there should be significant concern for slope erosion and loss. If this occurred the impact on habitat would be substantial. Although not specifically relevant here, I cannot resist the opportunity to comment that by far the most important land use consideration will be what occurs on the Union Oil property and hopefully that development will be required to maximize benefits to the habitat there as it is inextricably tied to the Marsh, the Hatchery and the Point Edwards buffer. It is my sense from the steps taken by the HOA including the hiring of a environmentally sensitive horticulturist that their plan will first and foremost stabilize soil, erosion and slope conditions and will consider specific impacts on bird and wildlife during and after the project is undertaken and result in a net improvement. If they proceed as planned to provide more diverse and wildlife friendly plantings, we should be able to enjoy birding there for years to come. Attachment 19 From: Andrea Bonnicksen <bonnicksen22@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:46 PM To: Lien, Kernen; Andrea Bonnicksen Subject: PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I am writing in support of the permit application and proposed Land Use Management Plan pertaining to Point Edwards (PLN2020-0054). The property in question is adjacent in part to the Chevron property, which has an alder forest. It is an area with public access (a walkway and grass slopes).The proposed permit is designed to remedy problems related to the growth of the forest. If left largely untended, the surrounding area will be left open to landslides, uprooted trees, and early movement. At present the trees are weakened by wind and snow. The key purpose of the proposed action is to enhance slope preservation and promote healthy and stable slopes. While the primary purpose is to enhance slope preservation, steps to short up the slope will open the viewing available from the slope and overlooks, which was originally seen as a benefit of this public area. I urge you to support these proposals that will (1) provide much needed management of the area, (2) substitute new management plans that are consistent with that needed to protect the wooded area, (3) do this without a net loss of rees, (4) open the view available to owners and the surrounding community, and (5) protect against slope erosion. Thank you. Sincerely, Andrea Bonnicksen 75 Pine Street # 204 Edmonds WA 98020 bonnicksen22(cr�,gmail. com Attachment 19 From: Ron Eber <ronaldeber@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:22 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Pt. Edwards Tree Cutting Proposal Kernen: I have briefly look over the application and materials relative to this application. I am in total support of the comments submitted my Save Our Marsh with respect to their concerns about the impact this activity may have on the wildlife corridor and Edwards Marsh environment. I am also concerned about any possible negative impacts to possible nesting sites in the identified trees or corridor. I noticed a possible nest on the North slope on Tuesday 2/23 when walking down on the Port Property near the docks. I do not know if it is an active or abandoned nest but this should be checked. If a Heron or eagle nest or area, these are sensitive and should be protected. The Edmonds Marsh and its surrounding and supportive wildlife habitat is a special resource for the City and region and should be given priority over improved viewsheds in any nearby development. Thank you for the opportunity to review and submit comments and please make these general comments and concerns part of the record for this application. Ronald Eber 50 Pine Street, Unit 204 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Attachment 19 From: Marjie Fields <mvfields@me.com> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 9:48 PM To: Lien, Kernen; Paine, Susan; Monillas, Adrienne; Distelhorst, Luke; Buckshnis, Diane; Johnson, Laura; Johnson, Kristiana; Olson, Vivian Subject: Pt Edwards tree cutting?? Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I'm pretty nervous about this proposal from Point Edwards. We have a bad history there. It sounds like a lot of tree removals, even though some are called "coppiced" — it sounds like the same thing. I get a total of 73 trees cut, and I have no way of knowing the extent of the pruning on another 78 trees. Also, what does it mean to create snags?? How is the city going to determine what effect all this tree cutting will have on birds and other wildlife? This property is adjacent to a wildlife sanctuary and used by the same creatures; the animals and birds don't understand property lines. I am skeptical about the landscape manager's argument that the proposed actions will be good for the environment as well as for the views. Marjie Fields Attachment 19 From: Gerry Gibson <bonger@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:01 AM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Permit/Application PLN2020-0054 I am writing to you in support of the permit referenced above. There are numerous reasons for requesting your support : The permit and the landscape management plan sets forth the right and responsible action; everything and everyone wins with this. The slopes on the Point Edwards property will be made safer, more stable, and better managed. Everyone wants this. Neglect of the slopes has serious negative consequences. The environment, vegetation, and wildlife will be better preserved and benefit with the slope maintenance. Certainly, everyone wants this. Views for the many home owners and those using the public access areas can be maintained as well as the property tax levels. Again everyone favors this. In fact, the city Citizen Housing Commission listed on 8/15/20 that the #1 city resident concern is the "importance of maintaining the character of Edmonds - mainly views ...". Again, for the above reasons and many many more, I request your support of this permit application. Thank you, Gerry Gibson 71 Pine St. #209 Edmonds Ph. 425-330-5238 Attachment 19 From: Marthlyn Jones <mjones026@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:41 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Point Edwards Tree Removal Dear Mr. Lien, read the proposal and studied the maps for the petition to remove trees at Point Edwards, and I have some concerns. According to the petition 175 trees will be altered (removed, turned into stumps, pruned) across the area in front of the entire Point Edwards complex, yet only 45 trees will be replanted and all of those are in section 102 on the east side. That means the entire border with the Unocal property which borders the Marsh and through which Willow Creek runs will have no trees replanted. Do we know what the impact will be for birds and other wildlife in those areas? 2. On the SEPA form under "Animals" only rabbit and coyote are noted. There are no listings under the headings for birds or fish. The truth is, the Point Edwards Community Trail is listed as a birding hotspot on the popular bird website eBird. Fifty-seven bird species have been sighted from the trail in recent years. You can see the list here: https://ebird.org/hotspot/L6097875 Shouldn't this information be included on the SEPA checklist? 3. The petition states that they will plant shrubs and groundcover to "increase species diversity." There is already a lot of species diversity documented in the area. We need to understand how all the species that are present now use the current vegetation before we make drastic changes to it. What is their documentation that this will increase species diversity? 4. The petition states that there will be no tree work within 200 feet of any of the waterways that are nearby including the Marsh, Deer Creek Hatchery, Willow Creek, and the Unocal property. None of those properties were shown on the tree maps so how do we know that claim is accurate? And how will the pond on the Point Edwards property be affected? As one of many Edmonds citizens who care deeply about preserving all of our remaining natural areas, I believe that we need an independent evaluation by a wildlife ecologist to answer questions about how wildlife is currently utilizing the areas that would be affected; what the impact to wildlife would be from removing, coppicing, and pruning 175 trees; whether or not replanting with shrubs and groundcovers would Attachment 19 increase species diversity; how removal of trees might impact the waters that are nearby; and whether there is indeed a 200-foot buffer between the tree removal areas and the streams and wetlands. Many Edmonds citizens were appalled and sickened when the tall trees in this area were butchered illegally one weekend during the building of Point Edwards many years ago —trees where bald eagles roosted and herons nested. We need to be extremely cautious and diligent in our examination of the proposal and the impacts it could have on Edmonds' other citizens, our wildlife. Please don't sacrifice nature for all to a view for a few. Thank you for your consideration. Marthlyn Jones 1045 Daley Street Edmonds, 98020 425-775-3816 Attachment 19 From: SUSAN LARSON <earlsusan@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 11:02 AM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Bel Johnson Subject: PLN2020-0054 - Public Comment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged To: The City of Edmonds and the Architectural Design Board Att: Kernen Lien From: Earl and Susan Larson Re: Point Edwards Land Use Management Plan - PLN2020-0054 Date: February 24, 2021 As both residents of Point Edwards and the unique city of Edmonds, we highly endorse the proposal in the Land Use Management Plan. Naturally our views are very important to us as they are to all inhabitants of such a beautiful setting as Edmonds. Be it "The Bowl", downtown, the marina, etc., we live in a breathtaking area. Two factors are of utmost importance, the first being the added safety for hillside stabilization. The other factor of high importance is the revegetation of trees and understory plants that will bring back a variety of food and shelter for the wildlife. To enjoy all the animals, deer, coyotes, raccoons etc. that live in this area has been a thrill and we are seeing less and less. These points are well addressed in the Master Plan. It is also important that the Land Use Management Plan restore the accessibility for all to the public paths and outlooks along Pine Street. As the trees have grown over the years, we have noticed a decline in the use of these very community focused amenities. We feel this plan is a win/win situation for all residents, not only of Point Edwards but the City of Edmonds. Thank you for your consideration and looking forward to seeing you all on the public paths and overlooks. Attachment 19 From: JACK MARTIN <jfmartin1969@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 20214:38 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Permit/Application PLN2020-0054 Dear Mr. Lien - I fully support the application from Point Edwards HOA listed above. I am a resident but also a retired Development Manager for the Canyon Park Business Center. I know and understand the work necessary to maintain developed properties. The effort and design of the Landscape Maintenance plan together with the thought put into the design plan speaks to the environmental concerns and solutions. Keeping the north slope protected with excellent management practices is a benefit to the community for the view corridors preserved for the both for the public and residents. Please have this message forwarded to the decision makers. Looking forward to permit approval. Jack and Karen Martin 61 Pine St.#108 Edmonds, WA Attachment 19 From: Darlene Miller <rkmiller4@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:34 PM To: "Kernen Lien" <Kernen.Lien@EdmondsWa.gov Cc: 'Bel Johnson' Subject: Public Comments re PLN2020-0054 To: Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager; City of Edmonds Planning Division From: Rick and Darlene Miller 51 Pine St., Unit 310; Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Land Use Management Plan and Slope Permit Application from Point Edwards — PLN2020-0054 Dear City of Edmonds, Thank you for considering the Slope Permit Application and Land Use Management Plan from the Point Edwards HOA due to the extensive benefit their approval will bring to everyone in Edmonds who doesn't want mudslides and/or rides the Sounder Train or Amtrak, enjoys the view from the Southwest part of the city, and cares about wildlife. We have lived in Edmonds since September 1981 and have been driving past the property the Slope Permit applies to since the Chevron Oil tanks were there. When the city allowed the removal of those ugly tanks, required the proper and thorough clean-up for the land, and stipulated that public walking and viewing areas must be a part of the redevelopment, we were grateful. We took advantage of the views and overlooks many times, and we understand the negative impact landslides have on the economy as well as Edmonds in general. After moving to Point Edwards in 2019, we've been able to enjoy the views and wildlife on a regular basis and continue to care deeply about the public impact an unhealthy slope will have on the environment, wildlife and views. During this Pandemic, many more visitors than before have been out walking in this area, taking advantage of the wildlife viewing and scenic views, which is sure to continue even once life returns to normal, increasing the importance of this Land Use Management Plan. The slope permit plans will improve the quality of the SW Edmonds environment by removing/reducing problematic tree species as needed to ensure the slope stays healthy with the types of trees that will return and then keep the slope strong and healthy all the while keeping wildlife safe and healthy there also. This is an important benefit to everyone in Edmonds due to the viewing overlooks and path that encourage visitor use. Otherwise, the Alders and other problem trees will choke -out more appropriate tree species which will lead to slope destabilization, proliferation of the problematic Alder trees which in turn will reduce the public view point and walkway view corridors and reduce the environment quality for birds and other animals. We ask that you do your part to ensure the slope surrounding the Point Edwards condominium complex can be managed in an environmentally -wise way to ensure the slope, trees and Attachment 19 wildlife stay healthy as well as view corridors are improved and maintained. To do nothing would almost ensure an unstable slope, which would lead to landslides, loss of wildlife and loss of views for everyone in Edmonds who desires to enjoy the view from the overlooks and paths that were provided for many years ago. Sincerely, Rick and Darlene Miller Attachment 19 From: FRANK H MONTGOMERY <frank.montgomery@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:15 PM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Bel Johnson Subject: COE PROPOSED LAND USE MGT PLAN PLN2020-0054 My wife and I are writing to support the proposed Land Use Management Plan PLN 2020-0054. We support this proposal for a number of reasons -- *View enhancement. While the views from our unit will not be affected if the proposal is approved, there are many residents of Point Edwards (PE) who will have corridors opened to the city and Puget Sound. Also, the benefit will not be just for PE residents but for all residents of and visitors to Edmonds who drive into the neighborhood and stop to enjoy the views of the bowl, downtown, water and mountains from one of the 3 Pine Street lookouts that PE maintains with tables and chairs for public use. *Slope preservation. To avoid the probability of future landslides and earth movement, work needs to be done to remove and groom certain trees and replace them with trees that will reduce damage to the slope. * Wildlife diversity. As avid birders for many years, we have enjoyed the wildlife we have around PE, but I look forward to the additional variety of trees, remaining snags, and new shrubs and plants that will provide seeds and berries fostering a larger population of birds and other wildlife. The project will be supervised by the PE Landscape Manager, a highly respected landscape designer with support from a certified arborist. The work will be done with the ecological awareness and sensitivity that is shown in the beauty and care given to the current PE property, and by protecting existing wildlife and avoiding harsh chemical treatments and heavy equipment. In summary PE wants to ensure the health and stability of its North slope property by replacing a dense forest of red alder with no understory and ground covered by ivy and other plants unfriendly to wildlife with trees of varying heights, snags, and a large selection of plantings that provide seeds and berries for wildlife. While this project will provide benefits to PE and Edmonds residents, it will also stabilize the slope and support a growing wildlife population with a more diverse habitat and source of food, forage and nesting. Frank & Mary Montgomery 65 Pine St #304 Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 19 From: Bobbie Nicholson <bobbie nicholson@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 12:34 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: City of Edmonds - PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged We are writing in support of PLN2020-0054 and the thinning, topping and removal of alder on the north slope of the Point Edwards development. There are a great number of reasons one might cite, and here are just a few. 1. Without proper management of alder overgrowth there is risk of erosion with the likely consequence of landslides. We have only to look up north on the rail lines to know how destructive landslides have been to both Edmonds and Everett. We must do all we can to eliminate such damage to the north slope of Point Edwards. 2. Without proper management of alder overgrowth more desirable trees are choked out. Fowl and wildlife may be adversely affected. 3. Unmanaged alder snap off in wind storms or under snow load and not only damage soil but become an eyesore to the entire community. This community has worked hard and invested greatly in having a beautiful waterfront — and the Point Edwards slope contributes to that beauty. 4. Unmanaged alder growth encourages pests. Just last year (and in many other years as well) Washington had a "crisis" of gypsy moths. Alder are known "hosts" for these pests and invite the use of possibly harmful pesticides to remedy the problem. 5. Without proper management of alder overgrowth the property values will decline, and the City and County will therefore receive less revenue. We moved into Point Edwards a mere 3'/2 years ago and already our view is compromised. Give those trees another 3 '/z years and we'll no longer see anything but distant islands. If we lose our views, we will have no choice but to protest valuations. There will likely be those who consider themselves to be "protectors of the environment" who will argue for denial or amendment of the plan. However, common sense dictates that those who live at Point Edwards ought to be given preference in consideration since they are the ones who invested in the subject property and stand to lose the most when the adverse consequences noted above occur. Likewise, those who live in 5 Corners or Meadowdale, or in Perrinville or Esperance, or any of the other Edmonds neighborhood should be given preference when speaking to the issues that relate to their neighborhoods. This issue is a Point Edwards issue. Attachment 19 One of the amenities Point Edwards residents pay top dollar for is a first-rate landscape team. That management team costs the City of Edmonds NOTHING — but still benefits the City, its residents and visitors. The grounds, the public walkways, and the views from the public oversights on Pine Street are happily shared with visitors who come to take in the beauty of this region. We look up at one such viewpoint from our unit, and see people looking through the complimentary scopes daily. We see families stopping to eat their lunch at the patio furniture provided for the public while enjoying the ferry and boat traffic. We watch people park their cars and take out strollers just to be able to enjoy a safe area in which little kids can explore or skip on maintained walkways. If we desire to keep this pristine setting for generations to come, managing the weed -like growth of alder must be a part of the plan. We urge the Architectural Design Board to approve PLN2020-0054 Respectfully, Rod M. Nicholson Bobbie (Barbara) Nicholson 65 Pine Street, APT 204 Edmonds, WA Attachment 19 From: Joe Niemer <pjniemer@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 6:12 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: permit PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Please expedite the approval of this permit. The significant amount of time, money and diligence put into this permit is all but overwhelming. Further delay in the approval process is entirely unwarranted. The minimal impact on the environment of Edmonds is far outweighed by the view preservation and restoration. Please, no further delays. Joe Niemer 9792 Edmonds Way Edmonds Sent from the all new Aol app for 10S Attachment 19 From: bebopbill <bebopbill@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:54 PM To: Lien, Kernen; Council; bel@pointedwardshoa.com Subject: Fwd: Tree Removal at Point Edwards To whom it may concern; I whole heartedly endorse, echo and amplify the enclosed letter by Save the Marsh. We went down there and it was hard to tell exactly what trees are in question. Is there a map posted somewhere that shows what trees are proposed to be cut. That's a lot of trees that you want to cut. I would encourage you to space out your timetable, and not cut so many at once. We saw the black coyote when we were down there. This is truly a wildlife refuge. By cutting so many trres at once , you are directly impacting the Marsh ecosystem. And it being on a steep slope above a wet land, I would think that this is a critical area , and all tree cutting should be limited and curtailed. Pleas be responsible environmental stewards ! Thank you ! Bill Phipps -------- Original message -------- From: Save Our Marsh <save.the.edmonds.marsh@gmail.com> Date: 2/23/21 8:44 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Kernen Lien <kernen.lien@edmondswa.gov>, mtmian1946@gmail.com, bel@pointedwardshoa.com Cc: Edmonds City Council <council@edmondswa.gov>, Mayor Nelson <Michael.Nelson@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Tree Removal at Point Edwards Mr. Lien - please view the following message to the Point Edwards Homeowners Association as a public comment on Permit Application PLN2020-0054. To: Point Edwards Homeowners Association, We urge you to revisit your Landscape Management Plan with an eye towards the adverse as well as beneficial aspects of vegetation management on wildlife in the area. We appreciate the desire to maintain views of the beautiful environs around Pt. Edwards, and only ask that your landscape planning take into account and "balance" the value of trees for life history needs of wildlife (as well as human health) with property owner desires for open views. Attachment 19 The vegetated strip on the hillside below the condos is part of the Willow Creek wildlife corridor, and the timing, numbers, and species of trees removed and replanted should take this into account. Removing patches of mature trees all at one time is likely to adversely affect the wildlife that utilize those trees and affiliated habitat. Great blue herons used to nest in areas of dense alder trees between the Marsh and the Pt Edwards property, and herons have been observed in recent years carrying nesting material over the Marsh (though no active nests have yet been documented). Bushtits and other birds commonly use alder trees for their nests. Deer fawns and coyote pups have also been observed in the wildlife corridor. As you know, with WSDOT terminating their plan to relocate the ferry terminal below Pt Edwards, the Save Our Marsh group has urged the City and State to designate the old Unocal property as a wildlife reserve (or sanctuary) with a tidal channel across it to bring back salmon and restore the estuary. Thus, vegetation management on the hillside above the old Unocal property will be important for and affect wildlife restoration. We ask that the Point Edwards Homeowners Association consider incorporating the "Certified Wildlife Habitat" criteria established by the National Wildlife Federation (see: https://www.nwf.org/certify ) into your Landscape Management Plan, and obtain wildlife habitat certification and post signs of such on your property. We'd also suggest the association consult a wildlife ecologist in making necessary revisions to the Landscape Management Plan. We did note that the SEPA checklist that you sent to the City of Edmonds does not adequately address wildlife in the area, nor the potential adverse effects of tree removal on wildlife. Further, the SEPA checklist does not acknowledge the wildlife value and usage of the stormwater detention pond on your property. Even though it is a manmade pond, it has become a valuable asset to wildlife and any tree removal near the pond can adversely affect that wildlife. Bill Anderson, a local wildlife enthusiast and photographer who recently passed away, documented 28 different bird species from 2013 to 2016 in the "Point Edwards Walkway, Condos, Unocal" area. The following bird species that Bill has documented at Point Edwards should be addressed in the SEPA document: Canada goose, Gadwall, Mallard, Northern shoveler, Redhead, Ring-necked duck, California quail, Great blue heron, Green heron, Bald eagle, Cooper's hawk, Sharp -shinned hawk, Rufous hummingbird, Anna's hummingbird, Northern flicker, Steller's jay, American crow, Violet -green swallow, Barn swallow, Bushtit, Bewick's wren, Ruby -crowned kinglet, American robin, Cedar waxwing, Song Sparrow, Dark -eyed junco, Red -winged blackbird, and American goldfinch. Deer (adults and fawn), coyotes (adults and pups) and racoons have also been observed at Pt Edwards and should be addressed in the SEPA document. Thank you for your consideration of our request to modify your Landscape Management Plan to "balance" wildlife needs and the value of mature trees to human health and well being with your goal to maintain views. Attachment 19 From: Pam Erickson <Erickson1840@outlook.com> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 2:05 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: PLN2020-0054 Pam Erickson's comments Subject: PLN2020-0054 Pam Erickson's comments From: Pamela Erickson 45 Pine St#211 Edmonds, WA 98020 Erickson 1840C@outlook.com RE: PLN2020-0054 Dear City of Edmonds, Permit Dept: I have been a resident of Point Edwards for over 8 years. During this time, I have worked closely with the Landscape Committee and with our PE HOA. It has been a fundamental philosophy of our management to integrate organic and indigenous flora and fauna into our grounds maintenance practices. We take these issues very seriously and are passionate about protecting our environment. We know PE is very special and it is a privilege to live here. And with that privilege comes the responsibility to care for it long term. The slope preservation issue is an example of the necessity for a long term investment in a maintenance practice as detailed in our permit. An example of a more immediate impact would be to the birds who use these grounds to rest, feed, and nest. Opening up the canopy and replanting with indigenous plant life will enhance the grounds for all wildlife. Some of our residents are life long birders and they support diverse and healthy flora to attract and keep birds on our grounds. PE HOA, represented by our professional Landscape Manager, Bel Johnson, has worked closely with the City of Edmonds to ensure our permit meets with the letter and intent of the law and best practices. We want to manage our grounds legally and ethically. Thank you for giving the residents an opportunity to speak to the issue. Pamela Erickson Sent from my iPhone Attachment 19 From: David Richman <tithonia65@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:49 PM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Save Our Marsh Subject: Point Edwards Tree Removal Application Dear Mr. Lien: As a frequent visitor to the area of the Willow Creek Hatchery/Demonstration Gardens, I was somewhat surprised to see the tree removal notice along Pine Street. I appreciate that you are planning to replace the trees, but saplings are not mature trees. It is also disturbing that a wildlife professional has not been consulted, as noted in your email to Save The Edmonds Marsh. Unfortunately this is too often the case when tree removal is considered. I am also unclear as to the purpose or the necessity of this removal. Since these questions seem to be unanswered I am forced to believe that the project should at least be delayed until they are. Sincerely, David B. Richman 534 2nd Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 575-693-9099 Attachment 19 From: donald ricker <dcricker99@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:21 PM To: Lien, Kernen; Bel Subject: Pt. Edwards SLOPE PERMIT #PLN2020-0054 Subject: SLOPE PERMIT#PLN2020-0054 I have been a resident of the City of Edmonds since July 1995 and a resident of the Point Edmonds community since January 2007. I moved to Pt. Edwards to take in the beautiful vistas from my apartment, the public viewpoints along Pine Street and the public viewpoints along the public pathway in front of Pt. Edwards's buildings #61 and #71 and I hope with the approval of this permit many of those beautiful views will be for all to enjoy for years to come. As there was no previously approved landscape plan for bluff views overlooking the marsh, marina and Puget sound very little has been done to allow the views to be maintained and the critical slope maintained in a safe manner. Over past few years I have seen the growth of enormous amounts of underbrush and large Alder and evergreen trees, so as to eliminate or severely restrict those views during certain times of the year. At certain points in front of bldg. 51 the evergreen trees and brush are very close to the building that in the dry season are a fire hazard. The fire could start at the flat land below the building and swoop up the slope to the building before reasonable fire suppression equipment could be activated to put out the fire. In addition, the height of the trees growing on the slope is excessive not only for the view preservation, but with the trees growing "top heavy" they are prone to fall over in a big wind event and potentially take out part of the slope and affecting the overall integrity of the slope. As a homeowner, living on the top of the slope, I am concerned about the need to retain the integrity of the slope and to retain the public view ways not only for my apartment, but to keep open the public view ways for the rest of Edmonds citizens to enjoy. Thanks, Kernen, to you and the City of Edmonds staff who have provided direction and encouragement to us in preparing this slope permit. Donald Ricker 51 Pine street #308 Edmonds, WA Attachment 19 From: Susie Schaefer <susie.schaefer@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 20214:32 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: PLN2020-0054Notice of Application -Edward Tree Cutting Dear Mr. Lien, Here are a few comments about the Pont Edwards Homeowners new plan for additional cutting and major pruning of the trees on the north and west slopes of the property. I walked up there yesterday to better understand the plan and am now even more concerned. I do know that the e-birds reports show that at least 58 species of birds have been documented in the area but have not done a seasonal review of the information. I am not aware of other documentation sources for other wildlife use by butterflies, bats, frogs, garter snakes and salamander, mammals (large and small) or other amphibians and more information is needed. More documentation is needed before such cutting and pruning should be approved. Wildlife numbers in all of Edmonds have decreased over the last 40 years that I have lived here. I am asking for a denial or at least a delay of this application until there can be a comprehensive analaysis of the cumulative effects of tree cutting in Edmonds has been done. Susie Schaefer 1055 Edmonds St. Edmond WA. 98020 Attachment 19 From: Mike Shaw <mikeshaw69@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:26 PM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Joe Scordino; Marjorie Fields Subject: PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged To Kernen Lien; This email has to do with the proposed landscape amendment by the Point Edward Homeowners Association, that described tree removal, tree pruning, and restorative planting in the area in front of Point Edwards in Edmonds, Wa. (PLN2020-0054) I have several points to make, and in no particular order here they are: 1. With a previous history of unauthorized (and very environmentally detrimental) tree removal in their past, have the Point Edwards people shown the awareness and willingness to do better this time? 2. If active bird nests (ones birds are currently using, and that may have eggs in them) are discovered in any of the trees to be cut down, is there a plan? 3. If active bird nests are discovered in any of the trees to be pruned, will they be treated with all due caution and respect? 4. If animal dens or burrows are discovered in the areas necessary to achieve tree removal or pruning, will they be left undisturbed as much as possible? 5. Will care be taken not to let potential pollutants (petrochemicals, pesticides, high -nitrogen and/or high -phosphorous fertilizers) leach into the ground/groundwater? 6. Will the access footprint for this activity be as small and minimally invasive as possible? 7. If any of the above is NOT achieved, is there a plan for mitigation/restoration? 8. Will the company chosen for this work be vetted and held accountable for a high environmental and ecological awareness, sensitivity and track record? I look forward with great interest to the answers to these questions. There are undoubtedly more that I haven't thought of yet; I hope other people ask them during the Public Comment period. Attachment 19 Thanks for your time and consideration, Mike Shaw 716 Driftwood PI Edmonds, WA 425-778-9820 Attachment 19 February 22, 2021 Comments on PLN2020-OOS4 Mr. Lien, We want to offer our voices in support of the permit application submitted by PEHOAA. As newer homeowners here in Point Edwards (not quite 2 years) we are very grateful to live in this beautiful community and we salute ALL who have worked many years and so diligently to maintain the grounds we enjoy in living here. The views from the overlooks and public pathway are spectacular and enjoyed by us when we walk the community loop. Our particular ground unit does not offer a panoramic view of the bowl or the Sound but we feel so fortunate to be here, having met many very dedicated neighbors who share our desire to take great care of our grounds and Point Edwards community, and in sharing the beauty of this place with those who visit. We consider ourselves strong supporters of a beautiful and healthy landscape with plantings that strengthen the stability of our slopes and enhance the well being of area birds and wildlife. We want to be a part of good stewardship of the beauty around us which surely includes whatever remediation is needed and revegetation of the areas specified in the permit application. We very much admire and are grateful for the great work our Landscape Manager, Bel' Johnson and her staff do for us year round; maintaining the grounds at the highest level possible AND doing so incorporating best practices, using organic and non -toxic products... which those of us with a little bit of garden area off patios also do per our community guidelines. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our support. We hope the permit application will be fairly reviewed and accepted in the next steps towards being granted. Landis and Pat Smaaladen Attachment 19 From: Save Our Marsh <save.the.edmonds.marsh@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 11:07 AM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Council; Nelson, Michael; mtmjan1946@gmail.com; bel@pointedwardshoa.com Subject: Point Edwards Tree Removal Application #PLN2020-0054 Attachments: IMG 1213.JPG Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged In response to the public notice (copy attached) placed on Pine Street near the Demo Garden and potential 'soon -to -be' Wildlife Sanctuary adjacent to Point Edwards, we request you provide us advance notice of all hearings, actions and subsequent documents posted at http://edmondswa.gov/public- notices-text/development-notices.html for Application Number PLN2020-0054. We have just begun to review the documents posted on the City's website and will be providing public comments. We initially have two questions: 1. Is the proposed site for tree removal in the vicinity of the 'illegal'tree removal that occurred when Point Edwards condos were developed and will the land management actions affect the mitigation that should have occurred for the illegal cutting? 2. Has a wildlife professional assessed the potential effects of the proposed landscape changes on wildlife in the area including 1) the resident bald eagles on Point Edwards; 2) the wildlife using the Demo Garden, the Willow Creek wildlife corridor, and the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary and Wildlife Sanctuary; and 3) wildlife that currently or in the future (after restoration) will utilize lower yard of the old Unocal property that has a large pond used by migrating waterfowl and is the potential site of an expanded Wildlife Sanctuary in Edmonds? Attachment 19 From: Save Our Marsh <save.the.edmonds.marsh@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 8:45 PM To: Lien, Kernen; mtmjan1946@gmail.com; bel@pointedwardshoa.com Cc: Council; Nelson, Michael Subject: Tree Removal at Point Edwards Mr. Lien - please view the following message to the Point Edwards Homeowners Association as a public comment on Permit Application PLN2020-0054. To: Point Edwards Homeowners Association, We urge you to revisit your Landscape Management Plan with an eye towards the adverse as well as beneficial aspects of vegetation management on wildlife in the area. We appreciate the desire to maintain views of the beautiful environs around Pt. Edwards, and only ask that your landscape planning take into account and "balance" the value of trees for life history needs of wildlife (as well as human health) with property owner desires for open views. The vegetated strip on the hillside below the condos is part of the Willow Creek wildlife corridor, and the timing, numbers, and species of trees removed and replanted should take this into account. Removing patches of mature trees all at one time is likely to adversely affect the wildlife that utilize those trees and affiliated habitat. Great blue herons used to nest in areas of dense alder trees between the Marsh and the Pt Edwards property, and herons have been observed in recent years carrying nesting material over the Marsh (though no active nests have yet been documented). Bushtits and other birds commonly use alder trees for their nests. Deer fawns and coyote pups have also been observed in the wildlife corridor. As you know, with WSDOT terminating their plan to relocate the ferry terminal below Pt Edwards, the Save Our Marsh group has urged the City and State to designate the old Unocal property as a wildlife reserve (or sanctuary) with a tidal channel across it to bring back salmon and restore the estuary. Thus, vegetation management on the hillside above the old Unocal property will be important for and affect wildlife restoration. We ask that the Point Edwards Homeowners Association consider incorporating the "Certified Wildlife Habitat" criteria established by the National Wildlife Federation (see: https://www.nwf.org/certify ) into your Landscape Management Plan, and obtain wildlife habitat certification and post signs of such on your property. We'd also suggest the association consult a wildlife ecologist in making necessary revisions to the Landscape Management Plan. We did note that the SEPA checklist that you sent to the City of Edmonds does not adequately address wildlife in the area, nor the potential adverse effects of tree removal on wildlife. Further, the SEPA checklist does not acknowledge the wildlife value and usage of the stormwater detention pond on your property. Even though it is a manmade pond, it has become a valuable asset to wildlife and any tree removal near the pond can adversely affect that wildlife. Bill Anderson, a local wildlife enthusiast and photographer who recently passed away, documented 28 different bird species from 2013 to 2016 in the "Point Edwards Walkway, Condos, Unocal" area. The Attachment 19 following bird species that Bill has documented at Point Edwards should be addressed in the SEPA document: Canada goose, Gadwall, Mallard, Northern shoveler, Redhead, Ring-necked duck, California quail, Great blue heron, Green heron, Bald eagle, Cooper's hawk, Sharp -shinned hawk, Rufous hummingbird, Anna's hummingbird, Northern flicker, Steller's jay, American crow, Violet -green swallow, Barn swallow, Bushtit, Bewick's wren, Ruby -crowned kinglet, American robin, Cedar waxwing, Song Sparrow, Dark -eyed junco, Red -winged blackbird, and American goldfinch. Deer (adults and fawn), coyotes (adults and pups) and racoons have also been observed at Pt Edwards and should be addressed in the SEPA document. Thank you for your consideration of our request to modify your Landscape Management Plan to "balance" wildlife needs and the value of mature trees to human health and well being with your goal to maintain views. Attachment 19 From: Bob Spaulding <megaursa@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 12:20 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Public Comments Permit PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello, Mr. Lien: I'd like to comment on permit application PLN2020-0054. We are residents of the Point Edwards (PE) community and support the permit request for these reasons: 1) The preservation of the wooded slopes beneath the PE residential buildings is critical. That's why we have Bel Johnson, a professional landscape manager, to not just make the place look pretty but to protect the integrity of the environment in which we are located. Earth movement on the slopes due to mismanagement or no management could result in a catastrophe. 2) 'Bad' trees are crowding out'good' trees in the applicant area and our management should halt that. More good trees protect the slopes, improve the habitat for wildlife, limit forest damage and encourage a healthy forest that's less prone to wildfire, a growing threat. 3) Sure, Bel's efforts will improve the views of Puget Sound for some of our residents. (not us, we look inland) That's not only a good thing for PE, but also for the City as well. Why? Because better views mean higher taxes. A view of the Sound at PE is taxed as an amenity. No view equals lower tax. In fact, we have had many individual bills lowered because their view has been lost over time. 4) Personally, it seems to us that Chevron, who manages the land below us, has done quite little if anything to address any tree issues. We, on the other hand, have. Certainly those efforts should be viewed favorably. In summary, it looks like a win -win -win. PE wins with less possibility of our buildings tumbling down the hill, improved views, higher property values and happy residents, The City wins with better slope protection, higher taxes, better views from public overlooks on Pine St. and the satisfaction of having done the right thing. Last, nature wins. The bad trees are punished, good trees flourish, animals have better homes and natural resources are better utilized. Thank you for your collective time, attention and consideration. Joy & Bob Spaulding 41 Pine St. #309 Edmonds, WA 98020 303-585-0306 megaursa(a�yahoo.com Attachment 19 From: Judith Triggs <jwtriggs@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:27 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: Re: Permit number PLN2020-0054 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Mr. Kernen, I would like to comment on permit number PLN2020-0054. I have lived in Edmonds 28 years and am a member of Edmonds Floretum Garden Club, helped plan and execute the College Place Elementary School garden, and volunteer on the Landscape Committee at Point Edwards. I support the plan Landscape Manager Bel' Johnson and Arborist Justina Kraus propose. I know that slope preservation is their top priority. Alders are not the way to do it because they are shallow rooted, fast growing, and crowd out other trees that would help hold the hill. Removing some alder trees and replacing them with more suitable vegetation is necessary and also will attract more wildlife in the future. Sincerely, Judy Triggs 75 Pine Street #207 Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 19 From: Laura Walls <Laura.D.Walls.12@nd.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:45 PM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Bel Johnson Subject: Comment on Permit PLN2020-0054, Point Edwards HOA To Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager, City of Edmonds: We write to affirm our joint and enthusiastic support for the proposed Land Use Management Plan and slope permit application submitted to the City of Edmonds by the Point Edwards Homeowners Association (permit number PLN2020-0054). We are owners of Building 61 Unit 212, which faces north overlooking Edmonds Marsh. In the several years since we purchased our property, we have been troubled as our views, along with those of our neighbors and public visitors, disappear behind screens of rapidly -growing even -age alders which now blanket large areas of the north slope, shading out other plants. This is not a functioning forest of diverse native trees and understory plants --not the kind of forest that supports the wildlife and birdlife we so enjoy at Pt. Edwards --but a weedy growth that filled in the disturbed land. The highly successful project of ecological restoration, already begun across this entire marsh and hillside area, urgently needs to be continued on the north slope, in order to assist natural regrowth by the planting, judicious pruning, and overall maintenance of the forest community. Not only will this assure a healthier and more aesthetically -pleasing landscape for all of us to enjoy, it will, by limiting the dominance of fast-growing but short-lived alders, help to stabilize the slope and aid in natural recolonization with a variety of native species. We are deeply impressed with the thought, care, ecological and scientific knowledge, and sensitivity to the concerns of residents and the public shown by this plan. We offer our thanks and praise to those who worked on it, and we strongly urge that it be permitted to go forward. This is a very exciting enhancement of all the reasons we chose to purchase property in Edmonds, specifically Point Edwards, and we look forward in the coming years to watching the north slope grow into a healthy, diverse, and handsome mixed forest community together with all the birds and wildlife that it will attract and support. Sincerely, Laura D. Walls and Robert E. Walls 61 Pine Street #210 Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 19 From: Susan Williams <susanwilliams123@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:30 PM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: File Number: PLN2020-0054 Susan Williams 51 Pine Street #108 Edmonds, WA 98020 Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager RE: City of Edmonds - Notice of Application Name of Applicant: Point Edwards Homeowners Association File Number: PLN2020-0054 February 23, 2021 Dear Kernen: I am writing in regards to the Point Edwards Homeowners Association requested permit: Design Review for Landscape Amendment and Maintenance (Type III -A Permit Process). Over the years, the trees at Point Edwards have grown disproportionately large in relation to their original size and plantings. This is most noticeable on the north and west slopes where there is overcrowding and a significant chance of uprooting and causing landslides. In addition, they pose a crucial and significant fire hazard danger. Should the trees catch fire for any reason they are in a direct path to the surrounding buildings. The thick, bulky, overgrown trees are endangering the lives of hundreds of people within minutes. It is critical that we remedy this issue without delay in order to maintain a safe living environment. Point Edwards Homeowners Association has spent an enormous amount of time researching a workable plan to remove the trees and make corrections with a plan for replanting that will be more beneficial for the wildlife and birds that inhabit the slopes. The changes requested at Point Edwards will enhance our environment with a strong overall slope preservation. Thank you. Sincerely, Attachment 19 Susan Williams Attachment 19 From: Lewis Wolkofsky <lewbtw@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 20214:08 PM To: Lien, Kernen Cc: Karen Wolkofsky Subject: Fwd: Permit Number: PLN2020-0054 Dear Mr. Lien and Members of the Architectural Board, We would like to be as transparent as possible and state right off that we are residents of Point Edwards and the view from our condominium apartment is one of those that has been greatly compromised by tree growth in the last few years. That being said, we believe that we can still be objective in this matter. As we see it, there are three main issues regarding the permit request. The first (and most important) is slope enhancement and landslide mitigation. As per the Geo-Tech study, it is our understanding that the proposed project will promote the growth of shrubs and trees that will strengthen the slope as compared to what is there presently. The second is view preservation for Point Edwards residents. Needless to say, it would be nice to have some of our view return. We've lived in Point Edwards for 12 years and in that time we have seen the North Slope views slowly, but steadily, change from one of spectacular views of Puget Sound, Whidbey Island, the ferry, Mount Baker, and the Edmonds Bowl, to one of forest terrain. We realize that we will never have those panoramic views again, but it would be nice to have some small "windows" to look out. While the view for us is primarily a quality of life issue, it cannot be ignored that it does affect property values for all those living on the northern slope. The third is enhancement of the public walkway experience for the entire Edmonds community. It's a pleasure to sit at our window and watch families stroll by (particularly in the summer) on the public path. The path is used by joggers, walkers, birders, kids on scooters, moms with baby strollers, etc. How nice would it be if they could experience the public path as it was conceived and be able to once again catch glimpses of the water, mountains, and marina. The proposed project would also provide a better home for our local wildlife. Most of the small mammals have slowly disappeared with the growth of the woods. While the present woods seem to only promote the presence of coyotes (which we enjoy as well); it would be nice to transform the environment to one that sees the return of rabbits, deer, foxes, chipmunks, etc. to our community. It is our understanding that the proposed landscaping will also further promote the number of species of birds we will be able to enjoy viewing from our windows. In conclusion, we believe that moving forward with permit PLN2020-0054 will enhance the beauty, environment, and wildlife in Edmonds for all residents. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Karen and Lewis Wolkofsky 71 Pine Street, Apt. 206 Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 19 8-17-21 City of Edmonds Attn: Kernen Lien Environmental Program Mgr Kernen.lien@edmondswa.gov 121 5t" Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 45 Pine St. #211 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Point Edwards Permit PLN2020-0054 Public Comment To Whom It May Concern: I am writing in support of the Permit for Point Edwards North Slope. As a lifelong Washingtonian, I've lived in Edmonds since 2013 and have learned to appreciate its unique and balanced composition between the residents and the environment. This is something I work to keep in balance. I've participated in the PEHOA Grounds Committee and worked with Bel over these 8 years. Over that time, I've come to admire the work, dedication, and the community involvement Bel and the PEHOA have exhibited to enhance the wildlife and supporting vegetative structure. Protecting and enhancing the North Slope from erosion and invasive species while rebuilding a more native and natural canopy and undergrowth that will support healthy wildlife is what this Permit is going to accomplish. I ask our ADB to approve this permit ASAP. Sincerely, Pam Erickson Erickson1840@outlook.com 206 783 1840 Attachment 19 From: Bobbie Nicholson <bobbie nicholson@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 10:10 AM To: Lien, Kernen Subject: PLN2020-0054 City of Edmonds - PLN2020-0054 To Whom it may concern: Thank you for recent notice of Public Hearing and SEPA Determination on Point Edwards Home Association to be held on September 1, 2021. We are owners/residents/tax payers at Point Edwards and "parties of record" according to 20.06.020 132, having submitted detailed support in writing for approval of the plan in February 2021. While we have a vested interest in the approval of the plan, as does every owner/resident/tax payer here, we are not the ONLY ones affected. It is impossible to know how many visitors come to viewpoints to enjoy the view of this beautiful area — but we can attest that there are a great many. I look out my window to a viewpoint on Pine Street and constantly see visitors looking through the telescope, taking photos, and even picnicking at the tables and chairs provided by the Association. It is important, we believe, that the values and comments of those who are most affected by any decision reached by the City, receive weighted consideration. People living in other neighborhoods or districts of the City may have opinions, but little or no consequence. So we urge you to take immediate steps to approve the plan as submitted. It has been well studied and planned by experts, multiple accommodations made for any concerns, and management and enhancements provided for the City and all its residents — yet seems to drag on and on in the approval process. Every month and year that passes results in less view for residents and visitors alike — and the view is the whole reason we're willing to "pay the big bucks" for the property, upkeep, enhancement, and taxes. As stated (in part) in our earlier communication: 1. Without proper management of alder overgrowth there is risk of erosion with the likely consequence of landslides. We have only to look up north on the rail lines to know how destructive landslides have been to both Edmonds and Everett. We must do all we can to eliminate such damage to the north slope of Point Edwards. 2. Without proper management of alder overgrowth more desirable trees are choked out. Fowl and wildlife may be adversely affected. 3. Unmanaged alder snap off in wind storms or under snow load and not only damage soil but become an eyesore to the entire community. This community has worked hard and invested greatly in having a beautiful waterfront — and the Point Edwards slope contributes to that beauty. 4. Unmanaged alder growth encourages pests. Just last year (and in many other years as well) Washington had a "crisis" of gypsy moths. Alder are known "hosts" for these pests and invite the use of possibly harmful pesticides to remedy the problem. 5. Without proper management of alder overgrowth the property values will decline, and the City and County will therefore receive less revenue. We moved into Point Edwards a mere 3 Y2 years ago and already our view is compromised. Give those trees another 3 % years and we'll no longer see anything but distant islands. If we lose our views, we will have no choice but to protest valuations. Attachment 19 6. One of the amenities Point Edwards residents pay top dollar for is a first-rate landscape team. That management team costs the City of Edmonds NOTHING — but still benefits the City, its residents and visitors. If we desire to keep this pristine setting for generations to come, managing the weed -like growth of alder must be a part of the plan. 7. We urge the City to approve and expedite all aspects of PLN2020-0054. Rod & Bobbie Nicholson Attachment 19 From: donald ricker To: Lien. Kernen; Bel Subject: ADB Letter Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 10:32:02 AM To: City of Edmonds Architectural Design Board Application # PLN2020-0054 Point Edwards HOA Landscape modification and vegetation maintenance plan for the north slope common area I wish to request your approval for the above -mentioned application. Starting in 2014/15 the Pt Edwards HOA began to plan for the best way to stabilize the slope area on the north side of their common property and be sensitive to the environment and the City of Edmonds Environmental Requirements. Since that time Pt. Edwards HOA has spent countless hours conferring with the City of Edmonds, Kernen Lien (City of Edmonds Environmental Programs Manager) Justina Kraus, a wildlife biologist, a GEO Tech, numerous nurseries and the Save the Marsh People, in an effort to create a wildlife friendly, people friendly environment and still maintain the stability of the slope. The input from each of these was carefully considered and assisted Pt. Edwards .develop the plan you see before you today I have been a resident of Pt. Edwards since 2007 and I look forward to having this project being approved. Don Ricker 51 Pine Street #308 Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 19