Attachment 10 - Amended SEPA Checklist 6-15-21Exhibit 5
#P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Amended June 1, 2021
Purpose of Checklist.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions fi•om your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may
exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of
the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be
read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: North Slope Tree Removal and Re -vegetation for Point Edwards HOA
2. Name of applicant: Point Edwards Homeowners Association
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Point Edwards Homeowners Association
93 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020
Contact Person: Bel' Johnson, Landscape Manager/206423-4433
4. Date checklist prepared: Alay 6, 2020 Amended June 1, 2021
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds
Revised on 9116116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Page I of 27
Attachment 10
G. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Phase I: Upon Permit Approval September- February Phase IL• Fall after Phase I completion Phase III: Spring or Fall during
or after Phase II - Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates, Inc. - Each phase will be completed with the
consideration of the nesting behaviors and potential site use by any herons or large raptors. (See landscape plan for
more details)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes ongoing slope maintenance. Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates, Inc. has provided vegetation will be
maintained to maximize the health of the native species planted and to enhance the overall plant species diversity and
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
Wetlands & Wildlife Environmental Consulting, Wetlands Report, Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical and Environmental
Consultants, Geo-tech Report. Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates, Inc. has provided a great blue heron and overall
wildlife/ habitat assessment of the project site and how the proposed vegetation modifications relate to the potential listed
or other priority wildlife species at the project site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposars—d—ir—ectly aftecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
No
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPR Checklist. doc Page 2 of 27
Attachment 10
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for ,your proposal, if known.
Type Ill -A Permit
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Give brief, complete description of ,your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Point Edwards Home Owners Association, 21 acre site - PEOA requests to remove/coppice 73 trees (36 alder
removal, 28 coppiced alder, 3 fir, 5 scott pine, 1 cedar and 24 wild life snags. Prune, monitor, and maintain
164 evergreen trees. Modification based on Raedeke Associates/Aborist recommendations to
maximize native species diversity and overall plant health. Remove 35 trees [1 Western Red Cedar,
3 Douglas -fir, 5 Scots Pine, 26 Red Alders] / Coppice 22 trees [16 Red Alder and 6 Black
Cottonwood], 31 wild life snags. Prune 80 trees and monitor 89 trees.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic snap, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Point Edwards is located at 93 Pine street and zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP-1 ). Proposal will occur on
the North Slope and re -vegetation will occur in a section approximately 17,600 sq. ft. Trees will be added in Map L102
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doe Page 3 of 27
Attachment 10
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Hilly with flat areas terraced into and above the hillside. The North Slope has some steep slopes and rolling,
hilly areas.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
553/4
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
Imow the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term
commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.
Gravelly sandy loam, Kitsap silt loam, dense silt, and hard clay.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Remised on 9119116
P71 - SE PA Checklist doc
Attachment 10
Page 4 of 27
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any tilling,
excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Monitor irrigation in revegetated areas. Use erosion control fabric where necessary, add understory shrubs
and groundcover and trees to newly planted area.
(STAFF COMM
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMM
Revised on 9119116
P71 - SEPA Checklist. doc
Attachment 10
Page 5 of 27
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Edrnonds Marsh, a Marsh that is a Class I wetland, lies northeast of the identified area in prior studies as a class 3
wetland (originally developed as a storm water facility) is located north of the site. The Willow Creek riparian
corridor runs through the Deer Creek fish hatchery that is located northeast of the site. Amended June 1, 2021:
An existing man-made stormwater pond exists in the northern portion of the
project site, just south of the proposed vegetation modification area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
None is proposed. Amended June 1, 2021: Work will be conducted within 200
feet of the man-made s ormwa er pond, u will not impact the pond. vegetation such as cattails yp a
latifoli that currently exist in the pond will be left unaltered.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doe Page G of 27
Attachment 10
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a
general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well
Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Page 7 of 27
Attachment 10
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENT
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water fl ow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so,
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Page 8 of 27
Attachment 10
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if
any:
Does not anDly.
(STAFF COM
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, spen, other: Willow
X evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, ther: Hemlock
X shrubs salal, redtwig dogwood, Oregongrape, sword fern, vine maple
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops
X wet soil plants: Ettaiobuttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: cattail growing in storm pond
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
X The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife
other types of vegetation:(Adolphson Associates, 1995) includes adetailed listing of plant species, some of which
are found on the site.
Amended June 1,2021: Raedeke Associates (2021) also observed many invasive plant species such as holly (Ilex
aquifodum), blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and ivy (Hedera helix) beginning to establish underneath the understory of
alder trees in the northern portion of the Project site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Remove 73 trees (36 alder removal and 28 coppiced), 5 Scott Pine, 1 cedar and 3 fir
Create 24 31 dead and living snags Amended 6115: Remove 57 trees (35 alder removal and 22 c,Qppic�d),
Prune, monitor, and maintain 164 evergreen trees (26 Alder, 5 Scotts Pine, 3 Fir, 1 Cedar
Amended June 1, 2021: Modify based on Raedeke Associates/Arborist recommendations to maximize native species
diversity and overall plant health. See amended Permit information.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9,119116 P71 - SEP.A Checklist. doc Page 9 of 27
Attachment 10
C. List threatened or endangered species (mown to be on or near the site.
The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetatoin, Fisheries, and Wildlife (Adolphson Associastes, 1995)
does not note the presence of any threatened or endangered plant species on the site.
Amended June 1: Raedeke Associates (2021) also did not observe any evidence of threatened, endangered,
sensitive, or otherwise regulated plant species at the project site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
Use of native plants for proposed landscaping will be native fern, Vine Maple, Salal, Rhododendron, Ribes,
Mahonia, Amelanchier, and native groundcovers such as Kinnikinnick.
A in e n d e d J u n e 1, 2 021 : Raedeke Associates, Inc. statement - Some of the largest, healthiest alders and western
redeedar trees will also be preserved to maintain some structural components of the existing habitat.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Rubus 'blackberry', Hedera 'ivy', Cirsium arvense 'canada thistle', Equisetum 'horsetail', Scotch Broom
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near
the site. Examples include: Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates documented 17 bird species at
See Permit Exhibit:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: the project site common to suburban regions of Puget Sound Lowlands.
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Rabbit, Coyote and Deer
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates completed two site visits to the project site and did not observe any evidence of use by
great blue herons, or any large raptor species. Historic data obtained from WDFW (elaborated upon in Raedeke Associates' report)
seems to further indicate a is areas has not been used by herons for at leastyears. A number of other w► i e species com on
to this region and often found in-urban/suhurhan hahitats-have been identified at the nroiect site by Raedeke Associates (2021). No
threatened, endangered, sensitive, or otherwise regulated species are known to nest at the project site. See attached bird list provided
by Save Our Marsh.
Remised on 9119116
P71 - SE PA Checklist. doc Page 10 of 27
Attachment 10
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
The Edmonds Crossing Discipline Report on Vegetation, Fisheries, and Wildlife (Adolphson Associates, 1995) indicated that
\Mllow Creek offsite to the east and north has a small run of coho salmon as a result of plantings made at
the Deer Creek fish hatchery. Stray chum salmon and cutthroat trout have also been observed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The site is part of the Western Flyway for migratory birds, as is most of Western Washington
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Re -vegetate areas where the Alders and noxious plant material will be removed and are so thick that the understory
groundcover and shrubs have perished. Plant with native species that will provide food for wild life, shelter, and give strong root
structure for soil retention. Revegetation areas will enhance nesting and foraging while dead and live snags will preserve it.
Amended June 1, 2021: Raedeke Associates, Inc. statement - Retain functioning areas of currently existing habitat
and manage them along with newly planted areas to ensure optimal habitat quality as the site matures and
progresses.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 91191J6 P71 - SEPA Checklisi.doc Page 11 of 27
Attachment 10
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Environmentall-lealth
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No.
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doc Page 12 of 27
Attachment 10
(STAFF COMMENTS
(1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design.
This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the
project area and in the vicinity.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the
project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116
P71 - SEPR Checklist. doe Page 13 of 27
Attachment 10
(5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMME
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
Machine noise by chippers, saws, and other small power equipment. Hours: 8:00 to 4:30
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Measures to reduce noise include equipment in good mechanical repair and adherence to normal
construction hours to control noise impacts.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doc Page 14 of 27
Attachment 10
S. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on
nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Multi -family condominium complex. The adjacent property is vacant land and the proposal will not affect current land users.
However, it will aesthetically enhance current land use and nearby adjacent properties with plant diversity and habitat
structures that will be introduced
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much
agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result
of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest
land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business
operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If
so, how:
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Describe any structures on the site.
Nine condominium buildings, a maintenance office, and two amenity buildings.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SE PA Checklist. doc Page 15 of 27
Attachment 10
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
MP- I
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS
h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify.
Portions of the site are classified as landslide hazard areas, erosion hazard areas, and steep slopes. See Exhibit 3
Critical Areas Checklist
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. do Page 16 of 27
Attachment 10
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
Compliance with the City of Edmonds Type Tll-A Permit and a phased approach to tree reduction and
revegetnti nn
(STAFF COMMENTS)
M. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial
significance, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENT
Revised on 9119116
P71 - SEPA CheckhAdoc
Attachment 10
Page 17 of 27
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doc Page 18 of 27
Attachment 10
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMME
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Page 19 of 27
Attachment 10
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
City Park is located approximately a 1/2 mile east of the site across SR 104. Recreational facilities include picnic shelters,
picnic tables, Wading pool, a multi- purpose athletic field, play equipment, and a bandstand
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Page 20 of 27
Attachment 10
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in,
or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may
include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural
importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such
resources.
None known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the
project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic
Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources.
Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be
required.
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist. doe Page 21 of 27
Attachment 10
14. Transportation
a Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is served by Pine Street. Access to Pine street for 10 of the 11 buildings is provided via an internal loop road
which intersects Pine street at the east opposite Nootka Road and at the west as Pine street curves into a connection with
Highland Drive. The remaining residential building has two driveways directly accessing Pine street.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not,
what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
No. A transit stop is located approximately 0.7 miles to the north at the intersection of SR104 and Dayton street.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How
many would the project or proposal eliminate?
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state
transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private).
Does not apply.
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist doe Page 22 of 27
Attachment 10
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklisl.doc Page 29 of 27
Attachment 10
Does not apply.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
inswers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand
on.
18 . Zo Z o
Date Submitted
Amended Date: June 1, 2021
Revised on 919116
P71 -SEPA Checklist. doe
Attachment 10
Page 25 of 27