The URL can be used to link to this page

Attachment 7 - Wildlife Technical Memorandum(o2)Wetland & Aquatic Sciences Wildlife Ecology Landscape Architecture TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM June 16, 2021 To: Ms. Bel' Johnson Landscape Manager Point Edwards HOA 93 Pine Street Edmonds, WA 98020 From: Andrew J. Rossi, B.S. Wildlife Biologist Raedeke Associates, Inc. Richard W. Lundquist, M.S. President / Wildlife Biologist Raedeke Associates, Inc. RE: Point Edwards HOA Edmonds — Great Blue Heron Assessment (RAI Project No. 2021-010-001) This report documents the results of our field investigation at the Point Edwards Condominium Complex in Edmonds, WA. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate current wildlife use and habitat conditions within the study area, as well as evaluate the historical mapped sites of the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) colony and any other regulated species such as bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) in the vicinity of the project site. This Technical Memorandum is intended for submittal to the City of Edmonds as part of an application by Point Edwards HOA for a Type III -A Permit seeking authorization from the City to (1) remove, coppice, or trim existing trees including a number of red alder (Alnus rubra) trees and (2) revegetate the slope with other native plant varieties, as well as some non-native cultivars. See the Combined Map Set (Exhibit 2) of revegetation plans for specific tree locations and treatments (Thomas Rengstorf and Associates. 2015), which is attached as Appendix A to this technical memorandum. Raedeke Associates, Inc. staff visited the study area on February 16, 2021, and on March 11, 2021. During these field investigations, we documented wildlife presence, sign, and habitat, and we also described plant communities. We recorded information regarding 2111 N. Northgate Ave, Ste. 219 Seattle, WA 98103 206-525-8122 www.raedeke.com Attachment 7 2 reproduction, habitat use, and activities of all wildlife species observed. In addition, we noted special habitat features such as large and/or hollow trees, snags [standing dead or partly dead trees at least four inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) and at least six feet tall], and large downed logs. STUDY AREA LOCATION The project site consists of a 21-acre property, containing 261 Snohomish County Tax Parcels, at 93 Pine Street in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). This places the property within the northwest quarter of Section 26, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M. Site details received from Bel Johnson on January 20, 2021 determined the property boundaries. The project site is immediately adjacent and southwest of a parcel owned by The Chevron Corporation (Figure 2). This Chevron Site is not currently being utilized for any commercial uses. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Type III -A Permit application submitted to the City of Edmonds by Justina Kraus and Bel Johnson (2020) outlines the complete summary of proposed actions at the project site. The project will be completed in three phases. Phases I and II involve the removal, coppicing, and pruning of trees. In total, the project proposes to remove 35 trees, coppice (cut but leave stump for resprouting) 22 trees, prune 82 trees, create 31 snags, and leave 87 trees unchanged. All tree modifications will be completed using small handheld tools such as chainsaws and/or trimmers. A wood -chipper may potentially be used to create mulch, but would only be positioned on the existing access road above the slope to the south of where tree modifications will take place. Phase III involves the replanting of the slope. Similar to Phases I and II, the revegetation in Phase III will be completed using only hand tools such as shovels and wheelbarrows. In total, the project proposes to install 45 trees, 48 large shrubs, 61 medium shrubs, 92 low shrubs, 90 ferns and 126 ground cover plants. See Appendix A for figures outlining revegetation plans (Thomas Rengstorf and Associates 2015). These modifications will take place on the northern and northeastern edges of the project site (Appendix A). The northwestern slope will be unaltered. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Raedeke Associates, Inc. Great Blue Heron Assessment June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 REVIEW OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION WDFW PHS Database The current Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW 2021) online Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) database map depicts two areas at or in the vicinity of the project site (Figure 3) with records of use by great blue herons. The first area is located at the southwestern corner of the stormwater pond in the northern portion of the project site and extends towards the nearest condominium building to the south. The second area is located within the Chevron Parcel to the northeast of the project site and it is approximately 135 to 250 feet northeast of the project site. Both entries in the PHS database are listed under March 25, 2002. They also both indicate the presence of three unoccupied nests and up to 17 herons in previous years. There are no entries on the PHS database that indicate these nests have been active since before 2002. The PHS map also indicates the presence of wetland, resident coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhyncus clarki), and Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) habitat within the northeast portion of the Chevron parcel and extending towards the northeast into Edmonds Marsh. Finally, estuarine wetland and Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) habitat are indicated on the PHS map west of the project site within the Puget Sound. No other priority or otherwise regulated species or habitats are indicated as occurring within 1,000 feet of the project site on the PHS database. Great Blue Heron Colony History WDFW no longer conducts annual monitoring of heron colonies (Gary Bell, WDFW, personal communication 2021), and information that WDFW does provide is second- hand. The last known successful nesting period was before the PHS entry in March 2002, when there were reportedly up to 17 herons. It is possible that eagle predation greatly reduced the number of nesting pairs and fledglings. WDFW (Gary Bell, Gretchen Blatz, WDFW, personal communication, 2021) confirmed that they had no further information regarding this potential rookery area. They also indicated the nearest documented activity was approximately 1 mile from the site and this information had not been updated since 2002. EXISTING CONDITIONS Vegetation and Habitat Description The majority of the project site consists of the "formal grounds" surrounding the condominium buildings. Plant communities in these areas are characterized by small ornamental trees and ornamental shrubs with some areas (particularly around the perimeter of the formal grounds) characterized by more native plant species such as salal (Gaultheria shallon), red -twig dogwood (Corpus sericea), Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Raedeke Associates, Inc. Great Blue Heron Assessment June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 El The proposed revegetation area in the north section of the project site is characterized by a low diversity stand of red alder (Alnus rubra) with very few shore pine (Pinus contorta) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata), where an understory of invasive species such as holly (Ilex aquifolium), English ivy (Hedera helix), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) are beginning to become more established. The proposed revegetation area along the northeastern edge of the project site is characterized by dense growth of shore pine with some bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), vine maple (Acer circinatum), and red -twig dogwoods (Cornus sericea) interspersed between them. These vegetation communities extend off -site slightly to the north and east onto the Chevron property, but then end where an empty gravel pad exists on most of the Chevron site. The proposed revegetation areas are bordered to the south by a publicly accessible walking path that extends just northwest of the stormwater pond, where it ends. Current Status of the Heron Colony and Other Significant Habitat Features During our field investigations we observed a single nest structure within the boundaries of the project site in the northern portion (Figure 4) of the site. This nest was approximately 2 feet wide and 1.5 feet deep, and was constructed out of approximately 1/4 — inch sticks, but we did not observe any activity by herons or raptors at this tree during our site visits. Also, we did not observe any individual herons or signs thereof at the project site during our two field visits. We did, however, observe 3 stick nest structures off -site to the northeast from a vantage point to the north of Edmonds Marsh. These nests appeared to have the size and structure to support great blue herons, but also did not show any signs of heron activity during our site visits. The nests were located approximately 250 feet from the northeast edge of the project site. Based on our observations at the Edmonds Point property during our two visits to the study area, it appears that the herons have abandoned the former colony site, with (1) only one remaining potential 2-foot diameter nest (that is not confirmed as having ever been utilized by herons) still present, (2) no herons present during site visits, and (3) no evidence of current heron nesting activity such as whitewash or feathers beneath nest tree areas. We do not have any evidence to suggest that herons have nested at this site since before the WDFW PHS entries dated March 2002. Thus, based on our observations and information available, we believe the Point Edwards heron colony is no longer active and has likely been inactive for over 18 years. There is, however, anecdotal evidence to suggest herons utilize the area for other non - nesting purposes. Local residents have reportedly observed a single heron in the vicinity of the stormwater pond on the ground (Bel Johnson. Personal communication. Feb 16, 2021). It appears the stormwater pond with its cattails (Typha latifolia) functions as foraging habitat for at least one heron on an irregular basis. Further, Edmonds marsh serves as foraging and potential nesting habitat for herons. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Raedeke Associates, Inc. Great Blue Heron Assessment June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 5 Regarding other regulated species, we saw no evidence of nesting activity by bald eagles in the vicinity of the Point Edwards project site during our field investigations. During our field investigation Bel Johnson indicated two trees located south of the project site that were common perching locations for bald eagles (Figure 4), but no bald eagles were observed on or over the project site during our field visit. We did not observe any priority logs or snags during our visit to the project site, nor any other priority habitats or otherwise regulated wildlife species. Other Wildlife Observations During our field investigations, we observed 17 bird species, spotted towhee, red - breasted nuthatch, song sparrow, Anna's hummingbird, American crow, dark -eyed junco, golden -crowned sparrow, golden -crowned kinglet, Canada goose, red -winged blackbird, black -capped chickadee, pine siskin, American robin, Cooper's hawk, red-tailed hawk, varied thrush, and killdeer. The Cooper's hawk and red-tailed hawk were observed soaring over the site. We did not observe any other wildlife species or their sign during our field investigations. CURRENT HERON PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS The WDFW (Azerrad 2012) revised its Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) recommendations for great blue heron protection in 2012. These management recommendations state "...recommendations applying to an active colony should remain in effect for at least 10 years after nesting has ceased at the site of any former colony". Because there is no evidence to indicate neither the nest in the northern portion of the project site, nor the three observed nests to the northeast of the project site have been active for over 18 years, according to the great blue heron guidance, the management recommendations do not necessarily apply to these habitat features. WDFW's current recommendations categorize colonies (which are defined in the recommendations as Heron Management Areas — HMAs) as "rural," "suburban/rural," and "urban." These new recommendations provide separate buffer and protection guidelines for each such category. Had the colony been active, it would fall into the "suburban/rural" category due to (1) the amount of development around the colony site, (2) the herons' historic habituation to human activity within a short distance to the colony site (e.g., the use of the public trail with colony viewing sites located within 250 feet of the colony site), (3) construction and commercial activities in the adjacent roadways, and historic gas station, and (4) the overall developed nature of the surrounding habitat within a commercial/industrial area of the City of Edmonds. For active "suburban/rural" HMAs, the PHS recommendations are for a 200-meter (656-foot) year-round vegetated buffer and a seasonal (nestingibreeding) no -activity buffer of 200 meters (656 feet), extending out from the year-round buffer. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Raedeke Associates, Inc. Great Blue Heron Assessment June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 0 The WDFW PHS guidelines recognize that new activities in proximity to an HMA are a concern mainly when they exceed the type and intensity of historic activities in the area (Azerrad 2012). Therefore, any project disturbances must be considered in the context of the existing land use. Neither great blue herons nor bald eagles are listed on the Washington State endangered, threatened, sensitive, or candidate species lists (WDFW 2019). EVALUATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT Impacts to the former Great Blue Heron Colony As noted above, the WDFW (2021) PHS entries and correspondence with WDFW (Gary Bell, Gretchen Blatz, WDFW, personal communication, 2021) indicate that no heron nesting activity has been documented at the project site nor at the site to the northeast since before March 2002. This is further confirmed by our field observations. Accordingly, there are no great blue herons nesting at the project site that could be impacted by the proposed vegetation management project. Any revegetation occurring outside of a nesting season, while increasing overall species diversity and leading to the development of high -quality large native trees (through planting and maintenance) would enhance the overall habitat quality at the project site. Impacts to Bald Eagles and Other Wildlife Habitat The currently proposed vegetation management would occur entirely within the north and northeastern edges of the project site. Those do not appear to have any habitat features utilized by bald eagles. The two eagle perching trees (as well as other large potential perching trees nearby to these two documented trees) located to the south of the project site (Figure 4) will have significant visual screening from any vegetation management activity due to existing vegetation, buildings, and a topographic break between them and the vegetation management areas. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (2007) Bald Eagle Management Guidelines encourage preserving large roost trees, preventing disturbances to flight paths accessing foraging sites, and using pesticides, herbicides and other chemicals in accordance with local, state, and federal guidelines. These recommendations are all consistent with the proposed vegetation management plan. Removal of many of the red alder trees as part of the proposed vegetation management plan would cause the temporary displacement of some individuals of common species, such as those documented in the "Other Wildlife Observations" section. However, we expect these losses of individuals to be replaced over time with the establishment of the variety of native plant species proposed. Thus, we anticipate relatively little adverse impact over the long term to existing wildlife habitat or special habitat features on the project site as a result of the vegetation management proposed. The proposed increase in plant diversity, coupled with the ability to properly manage the health of the trees in these areas over time will likely enhance the habitat within these vegetation management areas. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Raedeke Associates, Inc. Great Blue Heron Assessment June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 Summary of Impacts on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat The proposed project would have no adverse impacts on the former heron colony within the site boundaries and to the northeast, or either of the known eagle perching trees located to the south of the project site. The heron sites have not been occupied for over 18 years and the eagle perching sites would have sufficient screening to avoid adverse impacts. Further, we have not observed any evidence of nesting by bald eagles on or near the project site. We would expect an increase in overall wildlife species diversity utilizing the project site as a result of an increased plant community diversity and increased overall tree health from maintenance. Replacing the relatively sparsely vegetated understory that includes invasive species with a variety of native shrubs and ground covers will increase plant species richness and structural diversity, which should benefit wildlife habitat over time. Additionally, the creation of snags through the management of the red alder trees will promote further species diversity by encouraging use of the project site by cavity -nesting species such as pileated woodpeckers. RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation includes measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts to any great blue herons that may utilize the project site or habitats in the vicinity of the project site. As stated in the permit application (Kraus and Johnson 2020) arborists will perform or supervise tree and plant modifications using known industry standards and protocols, including the American National Standards Institute ANSI-A300 standards, which apply to the tree care industry. For the proposed revegetation project, measures to avoid or minimize the potential impacts to herons and other wildlife species include the following: • To the extent feasible, schedule all revegetation to take place outside of the nesting season, or late August through February (Azerrad 2012). • Retain some of the healthiest red alder trees, including the individual with the existing potential remnant nesting structure, to promote overall plant species diversity and retain soil stability and habitat functionality. • Most of the trees listed on the planting plan actually grow as tall shrubs (e.g., vine maple, serviceberry). Thus, we recommend including the installation of native tree species such as western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and shore pine (Pinus contorta) that can continue to grow under the partial shade of existing vegetation and enhance the habitat quality in the future as the plant community matures. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Great Blue Heron Assessment Raedeke Associates, Inc. June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 • Focus on planting Pacific Northwest native plant varieties on the slopes and reserve non-native cultivars to the periphery of slopes nearest the formal grounds as much as possible. • Any removal of invasive plants that must take place in the spring before fruiting or seeding should be conducted without the use of power tools or heavy equipment wherever possible to avoid any disturbance to potential nesting species on our near the project site. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Bel' Johnson / Point Edwards HOA and their consultants. No other person or agency may rely on the information, analysis, or conclusions contained herein without permission from Bel' Johnson / Point Edwards HOA. We warrant that the work performed conforms to standards generally accepted in our field, and has been prepared substantially in accordance with then -current technical guidelines and criteria. The conclusions of this report represent the results of our analysis of the information provided by Permit III -A proponent Bel' Johnson / Point Edwards HOA and their consultants, together with information gathered in the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this information. If you have any questions, comments, or need additional information, we are available at 206-525-8122 or via email at rwlundquistgraedeke.com. LITERATURE CITED Azerrad, J. M. 2012. Management recommendations for Washington's priority species: Great Blue Heron. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. March 2012. Kraus, J. Johnson, B. 2020. Point Edwards Homeowners' Association Board Presents City of Edmonds Type III -A Permit Application: Design Review for Vegetation Modifications on a Geologically Sensitive Critical Slope. December 16, 2020. Thomas Rengstorf and Associates. 2015. Existing Tree Survey and Revegetation Plans. Exhibit 2. 29 July, 2015 plan set for Point Edwards HOA Edmonds, Washington. Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Great Blue Heron Assessment Raedeke Associates, Inc. June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National bald eagle management guidelines. May 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2021. PHS on the web. Available at: https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/. Last accessed February 19, 2021. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2019. State Listed Species & State Candidate Species. Revised June 2019. Available at: https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2019- 06/threatened%20and%20endangered%20species%201ist.pdf. Last Accessed March 12, 2021 Point Edwards HOA Edmonds Great Blue Heron Assessment Raedeke Associates, Inc. June 16, 2021 Attachment 7 Additional Figures Attachment 7 Approximate Project Location Tina Beach Park Off Leash Area Edmons Edwards Port of Edmonds Po" Edrerds PI v SUN rvi vvuynnuia �i Salt and Edmondsa ,y y D'r M1c `aQ Edmonds Kingston Ferry Toll Booth woa"on St SaIis _Harbor Square Athletic Club V !Z 3 d ti Walnut Stree Edmonds Shelleberger Marsh Creek Edmonds ,oa City Park w a QPoi Edwards < Con ominiums a S,11a Coca Ind 1Ly/0 ft- Creek '0 Y a 9 3 GoggleIlk\ o0 N zi FIGURE 1 - Regional and Vicinity Map Edwards Condominiums ^N— Point 93 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 RAI PROJECT: 2021-010-001 PREPARED: 02/19/2021 gaedeke BY: A. Rossi ff Nssociates. Inc. 2111 N. Northgate Way, Suite 219 IMAGE SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS, https://www.google.com/maAttachment 7 Seattle, Washington 98133 k Parcel = FIGURE 2 - Snohomish County Parcels Edwards Condominiums ^N— Point Snohomish 93 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 —County Parcel RAI PROJECT: 2021-010-001 PREPARED: 02/19/2021 Wedeke BY: A. Rossi IMAGE SOURCE: ;i'�'i Snohomish County 2111 N. Northgate Way, Suite 219 Assessor w•M.,., Attachment 7 Seattle, Washington 98133 FIGURE 3 - WDFW Priority Habitat & Species Map A% Point Edwards Condominiums �v - 1000-foot buffer 93 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 ■- Mapped Species RAI PROJECT: 2021-010-001 ff PREPARED: 02/19/2021 eaedeke BY: A. Rossi SOURCE INFORMATION: Washington Fish and Associates, Inc. Wildlife Priority Habitat & Species Online Mapping 2111 N. Northgate Way, Suite 219 tool - https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/ Attachment 7 Seattle, Washington 98133 M ve V16 02-foot diameter stick nest -I 3-stick nests, obsef'vecl,from across Edmonds Marsh 0 Ir eagle perching tree 0 Ceagle perching tree � - 4b 4L G 2021 Google 0 .F Appendix A Existing Tree Survey and Revegetation Plans (Thomas Rengstorf and Associates. 2015, Exhibit 2) Attachment 7 r PLANT scr.r F�� pint Z � eq!w�r�s , €' OWNERS ASSOCIATION '\ :� ``a Q � ��.oc,Arn i��i n THOMAS RENGTO P `y ES 93 Pine St. Edmonds, WA 98020 L, i ,} - e �y N6 �2 Gyo �= i -, 1e Removal Coppice poe ea 4t Prune G�gry , nNw. Snag- Live Snag -Dead \ Pruned Previously Prune Future - Property Line o 4 Fenice Line 4o o mAxj ` aD 19" BY) 7 A _ m..a.a ...... m.va POINT \ EDWARDS ROA .., 40, tf � NORtNCLOPE- G Zp PAST TTRE - d +\ F.%TSTING TREE SURVEY Pool Room \ e _J \ Road/Gate ? L� Charter Club I -1_,' � A_ ?' rr` Maintenance � f a Office NORTH SLOPE - EAST SECTION - EXISTING TREE SURVEY Pine St. _ L 1 02 _ e ,n Ze ,eN Exhibit 2 Attachment 7 point Eby OWNERS ASSOCIATION 93 Pine St. Edmonds, WA 98020 49 Removal �W Coppice Prune Snag- Live Snag -Dead 11D Pruned Previously I Prune Future Property Line I Fence Line PLANT SCHEDULE 21 I.F M. z—E -1 0- UNOCAL UNOCAL 1127 E21 E 2 2 T25 �r: ZY E,2 �E23 E24 �E31 L ERF E15E16 F UNOCAL UNOCAL Lu 4(j LU -A, 10- Uj t) < �PUBUCPATHWAY PUBLIC PATHWAY P-t`UC IAII�A, Building 61 Pine St. Building 71 Pine St. ��®RTH SLOPE - EAST �SECT1011 - SECTION EXISTING SURVEY ,= . V SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 27N., RANGE 3E., W.M. Attachment 7 0 IV 20' 401 g,-vt,dv, w%tv". 'p. MVNZ THOMAS RENGSTORF AND ASSOCIATES PO NT EDWAR N HOA NORTHSLOPF- FAST SECTION - EXISTING TREE SURVEY Ll 03 Exhibit 2 OWNERS ASSOCIATION 93 Pine St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Removal Coppice Prune Snag- Live Snag- Dead Pruned Previously Prune Future Property Line 183 Attachment 7 1O PI-ANTSCHEDULE F.Cli THOMAS RENGSTORIF snow[ pZ-1 ANDASSOCIATES u[xi[v� v,[s,[wxvw[o u �x./ rxu.uovwu c[oaw [ximxc .s ,u.. n.w. POINT EDWAlt S HOA NORTH SILOP EXISTING TREE SURVEY IU 41 ....... .. ..... Building 61 Pine St. SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 27N., RANGE 3E., W.M. Ll 04 (NNI Exhibit 2 PLANT SCHEDULE poinE�� (�� K.w.IA�,�«.�. ,.�w��l. 'yr5r`- OWNERS ASSOCIATION 93 Pine 5t. Edmonds, WA98020 I* Removal #D Coppice Prune Snag- Live 1k Snag- Dead Pruned Previously Prune Future Property Line Fence Line UNOCAL UNOCAL -7 W LAB� F� POc,b -- — I — — — — — — — - cc < L ---------- - - - --------- ------- -------------------- ........... ---- ----------------- --------- ------------------- ---------- Building 51 Pine St. Building 41 Pine St. <? II� -- ---------- 4 NORTH SLOPE - WEST SECTION - EXISTING TREE SURVEY -20-0' SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 27N., RANGE 3E., W.M. Attachment 7 a� uB,UB BUBOB, S�CBm,�[B [� Brl,. ® vrlUs cartoBn, stun[ vn[ olenw w QnBNDOrSCW umb[5i BWBUS r'x WBIBc w GaTPIB_f�5 CLfE 4NdlG RIY ® IXMINc JINBB B.KB BES1ENx SBORD mM - t>J Y EVSfYIC IMuSNE SnECES rrWUrM1 BIKBHw(r - u,Bw Y ® IXKTNr. [.II6 IuINE SBECiES B IIr55 - MxVD Sn[CC4 - IIB3f3 Y NORTH SLOPE - WEST SECTION - EXISTING TREE SURVEY T+YO-0 d8� Point Z� OWNE0.5 ASSOCIATION 93 Pine Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 1 L106 6INCLUDED AS AN EXHIRH FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY -- XxXX XXXx x 13 /-Alx XXXxx XX xx Attachment? RECEIVED DBo ze zozo �� 0 10 i0 ii �a ®'t;, ar THOMAS RENGSTORP AND ASSOCIATES n POINT EDWARDS HOA NORTH SLOPE - a a a a a a a a a L 106 Exhibit 2 93 Pine St. Edmond,, WA 98020 Goc OEE�Xisting ;Shrubs roundc ve, Shrubs S Z.. Sh b Property Line Fence Line Building 71 Pine St. Point Edwards HOA Permit 111-A 018 Revegetation Map ot • Pool 00 0 Charter Club HMaintenance Office z NORTH SLOPE- EAST SECTION EXISTING TREE SURVEY Attachment 7 11 AN I LI02, E33-EQ Updated on 617111 T c T=mo woe.oq am o.2 ?g C D • a.-h— C. n.e mPe P... ZL SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 27N., RANGE 3E., W.M. —E 1AMAR111 It IN-1 Exhibit 2 N c 1� 11 .—pIetati— Plan vtn�t �T 93 Pine St. Edmonds, WA 98020 _ Existing µ; Trees_ + Shrubs \\�Groundcover i Low Shrubs Property Line Fence Line Point Edwards HOA una° Permit III -A PLANT SCHEDULE 1-104, E3-E8 Updated 617121 Gom ooe e.m. �o• �e NI sg o reI�0o0woca s 19 Zw r - PUBLIC p4 TN , e, r IN -0-4: A, r � NORTH SLOPE EAST SECTION - EXI* TREE SURVEY Building 51 Pine St. SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 27N., RANGE 3E., W.M. Building 61 Pine St. -� 1 20'.P I in 11 o' Attachment 7 i'9®1 IIFAM P U THOMAS RENOSTORE AND ASSOCIATES a..,,., POINT EMARDS HOA NORTH SLOPF- I.ASTSF.eT1ON- EXIST ING TREE SURVEY Exhibit 2 L104 Revegetation Plan