The URL can be used to link to this page

110 3RD AVE N (2)_RedactedIIIIIIIIIIII 4862 110 3RD AVE N *elzJOHN W. MELLOFPP.E. J U N 2 4 1997 March 24, 1993 ENGINEERING: Mr. Gordon C. Hyde 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Soundview Plaza - Pipe to Bldg Setback Distance Dear Gordy: We are hereby requesting a variance from the usual pipe/building setback distance of 10 feet for the subject project. The location of the pipe for which this variance is requested is along the south side of the subject building. Please call me at (425)775-5317 if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, John W. Mellor, P.E. 606 Soter Lane Edmonds, Washington 98020 Phone/FAX(206)775-5317/771-9155 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA'98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering jnC.1890 May 7, 1997 John Mellor. 606 Sater Lane Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Subject: Markezinis proposed mixed use proposal at 110 - 3rd Ave. N. (AD13-96-113 _ (Plan Check 97-M Dear John: The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject proposal. Please see the enclosed letter to Warren Lafon, Project Architect. You will note that there are engineering concerns that affect the architectural plans and could have substantial impact on the engineering plans. Additionally, the following comments need to be addressed before additional review can take place. J 1. Apply for waiver for,storm sewer pipe location. 2. See notes on drainage calculation worksheets. Make revisions and address concerns as necessary. 3. Provide erosion and sedimentation control plan. Include details of construction entrance, filter fabric fence and other erosion control devices. Provide notes on sequence of construction. Include notes on stabilization of exposed areas. 4. Add notes on proposed pipe material size and slope. 5. Show elevations on contour lines. 6. Add notes on garage drain to sanitary sewer. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. 8. Add notes regarding inspection of alley and sidewalks. Removal and replacement may be . required based upon inspection by the City of Edmonds Engineering staff. Provide standard details for sidewalk, curb and gutter, and paving. 9. Provide detailed elevation information on sidewalk, curb and gutter in proximity of public entrance to building. Profiles and grades, as well as spot elevations, should be included. 10. Right-of-way construction permit is required for work in right-of-way. Provide detail for asphalt patch. 11. Install bollards or other devices to protect transformer from alley traffic. 12.Traffic mitigation fees of $1,094 must be paid prior to building permit issuance. 13.On-street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 14. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas to the on -site parking. ADB96113.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International Hekinan, Japan John Mellor May 7, 1997 Page 2 When the revisions are completed, please return the red -lined drawing with two sets of revised civil drawings for additional review. If you have any questions regarding storm drainage, please call Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, at 771-0220 extension 323. If you have questions regarding utilities, please call Scott Highland, Water/Sewer,Division, at 771-0235. If you have any other questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at 771-0220, extension 325. .Prior to final construction authorization, it will be necessary to have a bond in place for all site improvements and a review fee equal to 2.2% of the cost of the improvements must be paid. A bond cost estimate will need to be provided to calculate the amounts of these fees. Sincerely, ! A ) James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer GCH/JCW/sf Enclosure c: Lara Knaak, permit coordinator ADB96113.DOC 1pC.1B913 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • Q061 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 . COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering May 7, 1997 Mr. Warren Lafon 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Subject: Markezinis proposed mixed use proposal at 110 - 3rd Ave N. (ADB-96-113)(Plan Check 97-111) Dear Warren: The Engineering Division has attempted review of the subject proposal. Please see the enclosed letter to John Mellor, Project Engineer. During staff review, some basic design errors were discovered that may have substantial impact upon the project. Neither the entry of the alley nor the vehicular entry off Third Ave. N. conform to ECDC and City policy. These concerns were earlier noted during the Architectural Design Board review process conducted by Engineering Division staff. A copy of the memorandum regarding these concerns is included for your information. Additionally, detailed elevations, grades, and profiles should be provided for the area of sidewalk in proximity to the public entrance(s) to the building. Before additional review can take place, these issues must be resolved. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at 771- 0220, extension 325. Sincerely, James C., Walker, P.E. City Engineer GCH/JCW/sf Enclosure c: Lara Knaak, permit coordinator A96113X.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 'PC.1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering May 7, 1997 Mr. Warren Lafon 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Subject: Markezinis proposed mixed use proposal at 110 - 3rd Ave. N. (ADB-96-113)(Plan Check 97-111) Dear Warren: The Engineering Division has attempted review of the subject proposal. Please see the enclosed letter to John Mellor, Project Engineer. During staff review, some basic design errors were discovered that may have substantial impact upon the project. Neither the entry of the alley nor the vehicular entry off Third Ave. N. conform to ECDC and City policy. These concerns were earlier noted during the Architectural Design Board review process conducted by Engineering Division staff. A copy of the memorandum regarding these concerns is included for your information. Additionally, detailed elevations, grades, and profiles should be provided for the area of sidewalk in proximity to the public entrance(s) to the building. Before additional review can take place, these issues must be resolved. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at 771- 0220, extension 325. Sincerely, James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer GCH/JCW/sf Enclosure c: Lara Knaak, permit coordinator A96113X.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM September 11, 1996 Planning Division Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Office/Condo Bldg - Markezinis (110 Third Ave N ) (ADB-96-113) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Engineering Division has the following comments on the proposal: 1. On street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 2. The project will require that a site plan prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The project will have to comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. 4. Provision for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. (Information only). 5. Existing paving in alley is to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Repaving may be required. 6. Existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Third Ave. N. are to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Removal and replacement may be required. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. 8. The cross sections.provided for the site are inadequate for the Engineering to use for a final submittal. 9. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas directing them to the on -site parking. The application is considered complete at this time. ADB96113.DOC CnT OF EDMONDS ENGUgZRING DIVISION L _ " 44C. 18913 May 7, 1997 CITY "OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771.0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering John Mellor 606 Sater Lane Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Subject: Markezinis proposed mixed use proposal at 110 - 3rd Ave. N. (ADB-96-113� (Plan Check 97-111 j Dear John: The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject proposal. Please see the enclosed letter to Warren Lafon, Project Architect. You will note that there are engineering concerns that affect the architectural plans and could have substantial impact on the engineering plans. Additionally, the following comments need to be addressed before additional review can take place. 1. Apply for waiver for storm sewer pipe location. 2. See notes on drainage calculation worksheets. Make revisions and address concerns as necessary. 3. Provide erosion and sedimentation control plan. Include details of construction entrance, filter fabric fence and other erosion control devices. Provide notes on sequence of construction. Include notes on stabilization of exposed areas. 4. Add notes on proposed pipe material size and slope. 5. Show elevations on contour lines. 6. Add notes on garage drain to sanitary sewer. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. . 8. Add notes regarding inspection of alley and sidewalks. Removal and replacement may be required based upon inspection by the City of Edmonds Engineering staff. Provide standard details for sidewalk, curb and gutter, and paving. 9. Provide detailed elevation information on sidewalk, curb and gutter in proximity of public entrance to building. Profiles and grades, as well as spot elevations, should be included. 10. Right-of-way construction permit is required for work in right-of-way. Provide detail for asphalt patch. 11. Install bollards or other devices to protect transformer from alley traffic. 12.Traffic mitigation fees of $1,094 must be paid prior to building permit issuance. bas-A 13.On-street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 14. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas to the on -site parking. A131396113.130C MR • Incorporated August 11,1890 • Sister Cities International Hekinan, Japan F . ".''fir M • • John Mellor May 7, 1997 Page 2 When the revisions are completed, please return the red -lined drawing with two sets of revised civil drawings for additional review. If you have any questions regarding storm drainage, please call Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, at 771-0220 extension 323. If you have questions regarding utilities, please call Scott Highland, Water/Sewer,Division, at 771-0235. If you have any other questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at 771-0220, extension 325. .Prior to final construction authorization, it will be necessaryto have a bond in place for all site improvements and a review fee equal to 2.2% of the cost of the improvements must be paid. A bond cost estimate will need to be provided to calculate the amounts of these fees. Sincerely, )a"*- e• *4, , James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer GCH/JCW/sf Enclosure c: Lara Knaak, permit coordinator ADB96113.DOC Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM September 11, 1996 Planning Division Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator 0( Office/Condo Bldg - Markezinis (110 Third Ave N ) (ADB-96-113) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Engineering Division has the following comments on the proposal: 1. On street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 2. The project will require that a site plan prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The project will have to comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. 4. Provision for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. (Information only): 5. Existing paving in alley is to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Repaving may be required. 6. Existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Third Ave. N. are to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Removal and replacement may be required. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. 8. The cross sections provided for the site are inadequate for the Engineering to use for a final submittal. 9. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas directing them to the on -site parking. The application is considered complete at this time. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION ADB96113.DOC Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM September 11, 1996 Planning Division Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Office/Condo Bldg - Markezinis (110 Third Ave. N.) (ADB-96-113) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Engineering Division has the following comments on the proposal: 1. On street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 2. The project will require that a site plan prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The project will have to comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. 4. Provision for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. (Information only). 5. Existing paving in alley is to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Repaving may be required. 6. Existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Third Ave. N. are to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Removal and replacement may be required. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. 8. The cross sections provided for the site are inadequate for the Engineering to use for a final submittal. 9. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas directing them to the on -site parking. The application is considered complete at this time. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION ADB96113.DOC 1 11/01/96 16:06 FAX 206 71a 3 h! 11MM..'roN tfo o �) November 1, 1996 File No. 21-96-031-001-01 Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA'98020 Subject: Soundview Plaza Traffic Generation and Distribution Dear Mr. Lafon: P RIW1rCOUNTER 1901t`3�rd •.:, ski;!r : U t �o4T PH'ii):i, 1V:1 Fhonr 20!: ' 7.1-3 : F,,,X 2N. 775.;,3y As requested, we investigated the anticipated traffic generation and distribution for Soundview Plaza, a mixed -use development in downtown Edmonds, Washington. The project is located at 116 Third Avenue North and is comprised of 3,400 square feet of retail space, 5,560 square feet of office space, and 4 residential condominium units. The following table, based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, presents the anticipated PM peak hour trip generation for the project: PTE Land Total PM Peak Total Trips Total Trips L, s Use Cod Trip Goneratio EntLnn i utinE? Condominiums 230 2 1 1 Office 715 10 2 8 Retail 820 _4 5 Totals /'�`99 // 21// ? 14 The attached map presents the anticipated disti the vicinity of the project:. Our experience has trips through an intersection to be of negligible don of the above traffic on the sixeet network in n that many jurisdictions consider less than ter. 1 hope. you find the above information helpful. PIA Thank you for allowing REID MIDDLETON to be Sincerely, REID MIDDpLE�TON, INC. Wendell A. Johnson, CP, LS Project Manager vlf\gep\smallpro\sondview.doc Attachment contact me if you have any questions, service. 360 u 2 6 VA �� \ \qO �M 6: 06 FAX 206 775 3439 SOUNDVIEW PLAZA Projected Traffic. Distribution Prepared for Warren Laton Architects Edmonds, WA 0.1 .0. 2 Mi I es . , >✓ to III_ � -, < r•t i.,,:�.. \\ � � �� N � � r r 4t S t'.: C .i ' `.�, ✓s�r �31p�.,�9 �"y ;;1 � C ) � -,1 �-,,. : s1 art` t,.{��Jt,K�'�C•yi�;,. % A ( _r� f t 1 r �. a� t��t�,T - Zr rG•J:^i �I�d N j �,��•��r�ia �}t(r�• ''fir V/ s� 1 - t 7 ts. .. 1'C � /{ 5 ► J «!'CS J `'!: `� sii k t�. i;J +• � Q , r � a.; C ) , p _ .c-sit. fit. •� ],j •ate{ hr r �^a Se 1 c'•t �r✓.. �� '�L �t �r •i' xY:.. rr t' q�,,'�i�} �'�Lr`T��'f'U�.•ti,�E,ri �� ' � a *,� t 1 � t � � Xf.��-�1• ,� y �t,.�kii v S ,,, Y rr ' f - 1- - f r< F ltr ��1 ry< I'^ r it-"t� � �{l?• iY;`>. j� yh,�,�r'� fi"S�••Lkt7 ql+^ � -r rr� , . — • ' `}`� Y-°� j��tj t: �'{�r'tl ��vt*s�r`"�'y��-F'si`r CG?� 4r t+ '':.: _ _' �` r-, i' l`v,4 EI r ly .. ,y ,..��-f• rr�.{ f Qj�Y1�'� s {,i k L,((I,t �ij 1.,i�r:r:i. Mj CO IWO Nj 1 J lYf,,. l,i' CI, �J t L..lrlr sk tl ✓, a ' ! tt t - \ f � i' f �, ''. r � �� ., r ♦C -1 it r- .i 1 f'1 Iti! .� I t •h r f 1 t t i., ri'�•1 Yrf •'j S`;1 71Ye 7} tf tl, 'f •r:,^ ,. 1't llr :1 y ..t t' st'il t':f �x rl� i �� '•�i. < 7A fj •T l ! � �. r.�,jj. Zi I, 1 t ,, � c.� _ NKt r2 �7 � k � t , r .,, "': +i-1`^'•'e'� r.. , . t � r '' :> ' j it Lys` i.2 y} C�..Yr � ,S�Yr �'" 1 \ - , !l t' t r 1 t • 1 r 1 -_`tl f L i'1 - {r d. .:) ., .: t `:iJ.t•i' G �rl- .� �•• � � ~~ :D 1 - 1 r �, r t i; , � i>�' �'u �':cviyi;��` •'t � : •. t�•i:(;�i� "i.: 1: ,i, t .•1. .11 I. ,. 1 t,.t �, r .�i >.,��,• t^A„ , �1. <7�1,1, i .C�,. t��r�.t: "�:r , �,>'. ° '::', .•f �li f}.r��rr.l � � 1��`�_1'i j,'fi •-•t''C��:F)�� :�.v�n i{�� r.l "a r _ •.• �47Cr'^' •,'r�?�.i��tr. tf>.: '� �. ,rXi _..7t' 'a } •1 , hI . ,:.^,: ��f': - ':'' a,r. kfF. !f iY �- rt • .L 1- ,.y,t r4 :�'!,f 'k:^ryi ti%' ,..Pa':.•1.i tY1 :C s ,:F - +� � f ti J � r _ � i; k - :»•,•J � f iZy. r♦ ti S � t...ro: i .J r..t ,. . _ _ t t��!,•j••G. '7 a r ;(-. tr -., -"f,Y •,1 •j,J 7 ' a.,,; f,tj cw� ,7'�.. t 4�� I• id f4C � _ �-^ ,,, 5- '`'+`,'d ",- 'tty}Y � "�'.YrL�f::t: ri".�:1•'i�l; 4_e� �!,.,,s J ! =•': t' e• .c i.'��;��4''�. �J+f 1 ; •--r ,;'..�; „I .t., a- ;i:, � �»:;z.��+•Sj�;��3t,:rr�'''�Js '.Y' .1: .`}.«r ;r^�.,► i r p i -�% }J i+ ,i:.ly'�_�i:�f:y , N4 � } :�,+ � } i. :�.. :... •::� t ..}�`�,_„?h <i, :�;C;�L,;' � .�,,• s _ < r=: i<r •1 j� 'd 1. r ) .r;,,.. �: =ti,�., tail t-,,r r1 r r � ""< r li-tt -f :� r4),�i7•'' w- YT .:.�,_,,• :i`-.rY.}?.':. i � ,�•-•, :" ' •!' .•+ % .. I' � r ;Ai.9',^_'r. `{'a 't ': r r �{a t.,�j .!!•'i` %�' ••. '•!ir•�� :�}r r " .t r ' ,71 � r;: _ 1ii .t t ... •,.,r• ;f• _�tt: /� MEMORANDUM December 6, 1996 TO: John Bissel, Associate Planner FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: SEPA traffic study for the proposed mixed use building at 110 3rd Ave. N.. (ADB-96-1= I have reviewed the revised traffic study prepared for the subject property. It appears to be in order, and the engineer proposes that the owner offer to pay $1094 in mitigation fees. These fees are typically paid as part of the building permit. As indicated earlier, you may wish to send a copy of the revised report to Ed Giraud in the Developer Services section of WSDOT. I have no other comment on the report. t< TFCMARKI.DOC December 5, 1996 File No. 21-96-031-001-01 Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Ii m� i r. crr 5„ri DECO'I JCL -id \Iiil il'tur, !n fJllI C00%IE tiuilr:lil P.O. Box 6638 WA 98036-0638 Subject: Soundview Plaza Traffic Generation and Distribution Dear Mr. Lafon: I'lione 206 77.5.11.1114 FAX 206 775-3439 As requested by the City of Edmonds, we performed additional investigation of the anticipated traffic generation and distribution for Soundview Plaza, a mixed -use development in downtown Edmonds, Washington. The project is located at 116 Third Avenue North and is comprised of 3,400 square feet of retail space, 5,560 square feet of office space, and 4 residential condominium units. Our November 1, 1996 report provided traffic generation and distribution in terms of peak hour traffic as requested by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The City has now requested that we also provide traffic generation and distribution based on Average Daily Trip (ADT) volumes. The following table, based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, presents the anticipated ADT generation for the project: ITE Land Trip Generation Total Land Use Use Code Rate ADT Condominiums Office 230 715 5.86/unit 11.5/ 1000 sq. ft. 23 64 2y Retail 820 167.59/1000 sq.ft. 570 Total 657 -� There is an existing single family residence on the property which, according to the Trip Generation Manual, will generate 10 ADTs. Thus, the proposal will generate a net total of 647 new ADTs on the area street network. The attached snap presents the anticipated distribution of the above traffic on the street network in the vicinity of the project. The City of Edmonds is collecting mitigation fees to address an upgrade of the intersection of Main Street and 9th Avenue. The City has suggested that an earlier mitigation offer of $4,040 to address the impact of 443 ADTs through the referenced intersection should be used as a basis for determining mitigation requirements for Soundview Plaza. As shown on the distribution map, we anticipate this project will put 120 ADTs through the subject intersection, which is 27 percent of Vo Lkw -7I • • Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects December 5, 1996 File No. 21-96-031-001-01 Page 2 the ADTs of the earlier mitigation offer. Thus, 27 percent of $4,040 equals $1,094. The sponsor of the Soundyiew Plaza project should draft a letter to the City of Edmonds offering to pay $1,094 in mitigation fees for impacts to the intersection of Main Street and 9th Avenue, referencing this letter as the basis for the amount. I hope you find the above information helpful. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for allowing REID MIDDLETON to be of service. Sincerely, REID MIDDLETON, INC.I Wendell A. Johnson, 41C , PLS Project Manager vlflgep\smallpro\sondvie2.doc Attachment SZ -1 N Q-7� - - • ��D�DDL�"1b11 SOUNDVIEW PLAZA Projected Traffic Distribution Prepared for Warren Lafon Architects Edmonds, VJA 1 1 1 LU �5 I-- i-\ - II I�i " I I.' d�� APPLICATION ,for The City of Edmonds SmIc SEW , VA PXBRW NEW CONSTRUCTIONI 0 REPAIRS 0 rASRWZNT No . ........ . .............................. 113-0800 OWNER ..........James.... ... Mar.kez.i.n.i.s ............................................... CONTRACTOR ............................. .............. ..... ..... ......... .. .. .. ... .................................. ................... PERIM NO . ................... ADDRESS ....... 11.6 .... 3.rd....A-ve..-.N ... .................................. .................... LEGAL ]DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BL40CK No . ............................................ ...... .. .. ...... .. ...... . N. . Q NAMEOF ADDITION ............................................................................ Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATA------------------------------------------------ W.. &90.199 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: J1AA I r-49Z /N(.5 Name Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Applicant Representative: Wf =af Street Address 06461,1aS 774 - 6550 Phone Date CA FILE NO. C1 Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) i a • 1. Site Address/Location: em 4ye, 2. Property Tax Account Number: 4q4 - COG - C/a - coo Z 400 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; no. C'Q, If yes; how is site developed?_ 5 1= gar6lp"Cs 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: A16 ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: do ; Approx. Depth: • What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway /110 floodplain of a water course. • 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? 11/D Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ;mixed ; urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: A/C Rev 01 /M4 SOUNDVIEW PLAZA ... Site Improvemenf5TK infaILE units unit cost cost parking space paint markingG ........ @...................................... $ ................. yellow curb painting ....................... ft ............................:......... $ ......: GRADING LOTS grading..........I............................ 5,000 c y STORM DRAINAGE ...................... $9/cy ............ $45, 000 48" detention piping .......................... 28 ft.................................. $90/lin ft .................................... $2,520 CBMH, Type II, 48............................ 1 @.................... ..:........... $1,400 @................................. $1,400 8" control structure ...........................A @.................................... $390 @....................................: $390 catchbasin - Type I - L ...................... 1 @.................................... $750 @.................................... $750 catch basin - Type I ........................... 1 @.................................... $350 @...............:.................... $350 8" CMP............................................... 20 ft ........:........................... $50/ft .................................... $1,000 8° PVC .... :................................ .......... 82 ft..................................... $15/ft ............:...................... $1,230 , $7,6YO lr SEWER 6" cleanouts ................ 6" D.I.......................:... sewer hookup fees ...... 1 @ ............................ ....... 70 ft ......................... 1 @ ......................... 1 ........... $300 @ .......... ............. $30/ft ............ ............. $ ............. ..... $300 $2,100 z o WATER 1 service meter ............................... water hookup fees ......................... EROSION CONTROL silt fence .......................................... rock construction entrance ............. Si8QWa4k C � @..................................... @ ............................... $ 1 @......................................... $.......4........................ $ 120 ft ................... :...................... $3/lin ft ................................. $360 1 @........................................ $300 @................................. $300 ao, Y- 9' X- 12. � � 3 C�-o a vD 4 �I n �4of I L I / 094 000 STREET FILE' GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES SOUNDVIEW PLAZA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR MR. OLA GROSSET NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 17311-135th Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 - .- (206) 486.1'669'i Faz 481=2510- February 7, 1997 Mr. Ola Grosset Grosset Construction 931 - 12th Avenue N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 i Geotechnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza I Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 195897 Dear Ola: INTRODUCTION Snohomish County (206) 337-1669 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the planned Soundview Plaza. The site is located near the northeast corner of Main Street and 3rd Avenue North, in the city of Edmonds. You have requested that we investigate the subsurface conditions at the site, and provide lateral pressures for use in the design of retaining walls. We have been provided with a Site Plan titled "Soundview Plaza", by Warren Lafon Architect, dated November 27, 1996 for our use on this project. In addition, we have had discussions with Warren Lafon, the architect, regarding the project plans. The property slopes from the east side along the alley down to the west side along 3rd Avenue North, with an elevation change of about 10 feet. We note, for the purposes of this report, we use a project north aligned with 3rd Avenue North. The current plan, as we understand it, is to construct a three-story commercial building on the lot. The bottom two floors will have both retail space and parking space, with the parking on the second floor, entering from the alley. The building footprint will be about 10 feet from the property lines on the north, south and west sides. The footprint will be 2 feet from the property line on the east side, adjacent to the alley. The planned floor slab of the building will be near the elevation of 3rd Avenue North, and that the bottom of the foundation along the alley will be about 13 feet below grade. We understand that it may be possible to use some portion of the alley for temporary construction slopes, instead of using a full height shoring wall. You have provided us with a copy of a site plan, dated November 27, 1996, prepared by Warren Lafoh Architect. Gcotechnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 2 SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions, in order to provide geotechnical recommendations for the planned improvements. Specifically, our scope of services will include the following: 1. Explore the subsurface conditions with backhoe excavated test pits. 2. Provide recommendations for foundation support, and estimates of settlement. 3. Provide lateral pressures for design of the foundation wall. 4. Prepare a written report to document our findings and recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The ground surface of the 120 foot by 120 foot square site slopes down .to -the northwest. The total elevation change from the west to the east end of the property is about'l0:feet. An existing residence and garage are located on the site. A retail building is located along the south -property line, while another residence is located just off the site to the north. The site is open and landscaped, with the exception of a blackberry bush area in the southeast corner of the site. Geology The Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties. Washington by Mackey Smith (Washington DNR, 1974) was referenced for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. The site is mapped as being underlain by Vashon Till (Qvt). Glacial till is an unsorted mixture of sand, silt and gravel, that is deposited at the bottom of the glacier. The upslope area to the east is mapped as being underlain by recessional outwash (Qvr), which is commonly a sand unit with silt and gravel. The recessional outwash is a moderately to highly permeable unit deposited by retreating glaciers, and is not nearly as compact and dense as the relatively, impermeable glacial till. Our explorations at the site encountered recessional sand overlying glacial till. Explorations Subsurface. conditions were explored at the site by excavating four test pits, using a tractor -mounted backhoe. The test pit depths ranged from 4.5 to 11.0 feet below the adjacent grade. The test pits were located in the 'field by_ an engineer representing this firm, who maintained logs of the conditions encountered and obtained representative samples of the different geologic units observed in the test pits. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gcotcchnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 3 The location of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a.copy of which is presented as Figure 3. The test pit logs are presented as Figures 4 and 5. Subsurface The lowest unit encouritered'oif the site was dense, gray, silty fine to medium sand with trace gravel. This soil was encountered below 7.5 feet in Test Pit1 (TP-1) and below 4.0 feet in TP-2, and is interpreted as glacial till. The till was not encountered in TP-3 or TP-4. Overlying the till, the explorations found medium dense, gray -brown, fine to medium sand with silt and trace gravel. This soil was found in all of the explorations below the surficial topsoil. Test Pit 3 encountered a boulder and some root balls to a depth of about 8 feet. The excavation walls in TP-3 caved more than the other test pits. The soil in this area may have been excavated at one time and replaced as fill. The foundations are expected to be below the depth of the possible fill soil. Hydrology Ground water seepage was not encountered in our explorations. In TP-3 the -soil at the bottom of the exploration (9 to 11 feet below the ground surface) was moist to wet, suggesting that seepage conditions may exist, at or just below 11.0 feet at this location. We note that our explorations were not made to the full depth of the planned excavation, due to limitations of the backhoe. There is the potential for water to move through the somewhat highly permeable recessional sand and become perched on top of the relatively impermeable glacial till at depth. Perched ground water conditions are common for upland areas underlain by till soils, and tend to be somewhat seasonal. This type of seepage condition tends to decline during the drier summer months; however, it could be there all year. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the site is suited for the planned construction. The underlying soils should provide support for the planned structure. The important geotechnical aspect for the project will be the need for cut slopes and shoring walls to protect the adjacent structures during construction. Safe slopes and/or shoring needs to be established between the base of the excavation and the foundations for the adjacent structures. We currently do not know the depth of the foundations for these structures. This needs to be established prior to cut slope and shoring design. The same holds true for the alley. An excavation limit needs to be established for the alley area, in order to design the shoring. A critical aspect of cut slope and shoring design along the alley will be the presence of any below and above ground utilities. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gcotechnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 4 Monitoring should be established whenever excavating below the elevation of an adjacent structure or roadway settlement. The monitoring should consist of settlement readings on the structure that are measured to the nearest .01 feet. These measurements should be referenced outside of the construction area. Foundations and exterior walls of the adjacent structures should be photograph documented for cracks. The entire wall alignment should be photograph documented. If possible, interior walls should be documented as well. Temporary Cut Slopes Temporary cut slope stability is a function of many factors, such as the type and consistency of soils, depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the presence of surface or ground water. It is exceedingly difficult under these variable conditions to estimate a stable temporary cut slope. angle. Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations, since he is continuously at the job site, able to observe the nature and condition of the cut slopes, and able to monitor the subsurface materials and ground water conditions encountered. For planning' purposes, we' recommend that temporary cuts in the recessional sand ,be no steeper than a 1.5 Horizontal to 1.0 Vertical (1.5H:1.OV) inclination. The dense glacial till may be anticipated to stand at a 0.75H:1.OV inclination. At this time, we would recommend that minimal till be expected to be exposed in the excavation, based on our exploration data. If ground water is encountered, we would expect that flatter inclinations would be necessary. We recommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include covering cut slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from the top of cut slopes. We do not recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than 4 feet, if worker access is necessary. We recommend that cut slope heights and inclinations conform to appropriate local, state and federal regulations. We recommend that unsupported excavation slopes should be maintained to --at least a 1.5H:I.OV line from the base of the excavation to the top outside edge of the foundations for the adjacent structures. If this criteria cannot be met, some type of shoring system should be considered. Foundations We recommend that the structures be founded on conventional spread footings. Footings should bear on the underlying, medium dense or better native soils. Minimum foundation widths of 14 and 20 inches should be used for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. Footings should be embedded a NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gcotcchnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 5 minimum of 18 inches for frost protection. Standing water, water loosened soils and slough should be removed from the footing excavations prior to placing concrete. For foundations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of not more than 2;000 pounds per square foot (psf) to be used for the footing design where founded on the recessional sand. If the foundation widths are increased to 3 feet, or foundations are placed on the dense glacial till, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures may be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Foundation settlement, using the above allowable bearing pressures, should be less than 1.0 inch total and 0.5 inch differential across the structure, based on our experience with similar projects. We recommend that we review specific plans if higher design bearing pressures are desired. Lateral loads may be resisted by friction at the base of the foundation, and by passive pressures against the foundation. We recommend using a coefficient of friction of 0.7 between the foundation and the underlying soil. Where structural fill is placed against the foundation, a passive pressure of 400 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) may be used. A suitable factor of safety should be applied to both of these numbers. Lateral Pressures Standard: The Iateial earth pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed and the inclination of the backfill. Walls that are free to yield at least one -thousandth of the height of the wall are in an "active" condition. Walls restrained from movement by stiffness or bracing are in an "at rest" condition. We recommend using active earth pressure and at rest earth pressure values presented in Table 1. These values are expressed as equivalent fluid pressures for the specified backslope angle. Although final horizontal backslopes are expected, other inclinations are provided to be used with shoring, if desired. These values do not include the effects of surcharges due to traffic or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered where appropriate. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnica) Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 6 Table 1 i Level Backslope 3H:1 V Backslope 214:1 V Backslope 1.51-1:1 V Backsl. At rest 50 pcf 65 pcf 80 pcf 120 pcf �I Active 35 pcf 45 pcf 55 pcf 85 pcf The above lateral pressures may be resisted by friction at the base of the wall, and passive pressure against the foundation.' A coefficient of friction of 0.7 may be used to determine the base friction. A passive pressure of 400 pcf, expressed as an equivalent fluid pressure, may be used in design. To achieve this value of passive pressure, the foundations should be poured "neat" against the native, medium dense to dense soils, or compacted fill should be used as backfill against the front of the footing. We recommend that the upper 1 foot of soil be neglected when determining the passive pressure. An appropriate factor of safety should be applied to the frictional coefficient and passive pressure values. All wall backfill should be compacted to 92 to 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch loose lifts and compacting with small hand operated compactors. Wall drainage should be constructed as recommended in the Drainage section of this report. Shoring: Shoring could consist of either soldier pile and lagging walls or some other temporary system, such as ecbldgy blocks: :The use of -ecology blocks would be dependent on lateral space and meeting the criteria for gravity wall design. The ecology blocks should be placed using a slot cut excavation, so as not to expose significant portions of the cut slope at any one time. Care needs to be exercised to maintain and/or re-establish lateral slope support, including compaction of backfill behind the blocks. The above active lateral pressures in Table 1, and the passive pressures that are provided can be used for the shoring design. Surcharges need to be used as appropriate. Some caving of drilled holes should be expected with soldier pile installation, and casing the holes may be necessary. If ground water is encountered, casing should be expected ,to keep the holes open. Floor Slabs Slab areas should bear on the underlying, medium dense or better sand deposit, or structural fill extending to these soils. Areas that have been disturbed should be compacted with suitable compaction equipment, prior to slab preparation. If soft subgrade exists, it should be overexcavated and replaced I4 NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 7 with structural fill. Care should be taken such that large, vibratory machines that would impact surrounding structures, are not used. Where moisture control is important, we recommend that the floor slabs be underlain by a capillary break material, such as pea gravel. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the capillary break material: A 2-inch sand blanket maybe placed over the vapor barrier to aid in curing of the concrete. Drainage Permanent drainage systems should be installed for retaining walls. These drains should extend well below the capillary break material elevation. We recommend that these drainage systems consist of a perforated, 4-inch drainpipe, surrounded with pea gravel. We recommend that a minimum pea gravel cover of 4 inches on the sides and. bottom, and 12 inches over the top. Above the pea gravel, we recommend using a free draining granular soil. The granular material should be placed up the back of the wall to within 1 foot of the ground surface. A less permeable soil should be placed in the last 1 foot to reduce surface infiltration into the wall drain. An alternative to the gravel drain would be to use a drainage composite. We can provide recommendations for composites, if required. The drainpipe should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point. The roof drains should be tightlined separate of the wall footing drains, until the tightline is a minimum of 1 foot vertically down gradient from the subgrade wall drains. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Grosset Construction and their agents, for use in planning and design of this project. 'The data and report should be provided to contractors for their estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions andinterpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The shoring design recommendations provided in this report should be considered preliminary in nature. We recommend that we be retained to review final designs, particularly with respect to shoring, and to provide comment and/or additional recommendations. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. Our explorations were not made to the full depth of the planned excavation. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We recommend that we be retained to provide construction monitoring services to evaluate conditions encountered in the field with respect to anticipated conditions, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Services Soundview Plaza February 7, 1997 NCA File No. 195897 Page 8 differ from anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork activities comply with contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied,: should be understood. It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. � 1 Douglas J. Bath Staff Engineer r EXPIRES 1.'( ;.P3 _ Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Engineer DJB:CPC:dfr Four Copies Submitted Five Figures r NEL sm CO U VRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. N VICINITY MAP C D E F G H J A B :5',v"' i:�..f'q7T9a:`P3r.. ,add;:?gP.7�•"".',;P'�''?';.v':'.'4". �i <• ;'', '•;9�='f � "r,'Y? f.' fi:..,y,� �,f 9 ? •{ e.i-111�y7 i'�. ( C .t.:fr $ •,' W /, e,: (.i• 4yA,.•� j-9' h. j.t•,rlrFt•id i -+•` f � {r'' 1,E �; �lfd f,,a�t +,,y.�9Pi{1 h't �1, i��Y�'.. •� �Ya 1 r•2 a � 1�••s:" F;1!'Y f$ •, "✓f y r. ti • n - W i; fir: 2 '�{ A ^� °J r L�. Ei � s rIt) � •f Y L7 'i i t } x IJ 7 D, J I v �, < 1 11l18t$",' t' J 9 li : oFJ{�� 4 i r d 6.. i Pe i #. T# f t+l1 y✓ .. { dKi.0 t ,'1 '.t .?p [pr. r.., M i S°4e J 1 I Ir , bf �r� E r°a4d•%i: Eti n ,� +" orl t .J L �'9'-i*"(p� td{a ''•. :f ! '°J�::•"a :.'.S r'h `..7, Syr {9 ,i' -Ei:.l :'yj•4 ! ": — N T';r ! C 1 .f' �' L f. ✓ ttd ^v a 1{: JS ,. �}r(i { £� p I;y+• t i�' , t E r2,* �' •t n to e r7 + ' - t 1g3 .r:.. J' •. i 18 : ( �. '.�4•�d° Twln li tr v tlr i'.• L ;• 3 .r. ' �,...'t 1. 'q,�3 '.� a5'r� }' ailtc N} ij Jt '.,;?rYjV ..�.Yr,r:r✓ {'� .y r r,r'f.'{;fJ� •:t .rut f tf`i:. ,,.ti ,dri-arr:1 `�" ' +Pt i�va !1 �c� r: �,�,y"'� 1' ,s,ir �.� '�� o„iJ i ,3{ ✓ y a'�a �Y� H'� i '� .� r >` s,, t, yXt •� a'f �r`i41raE a •e �\„#_' � t._ ," + tpy >4 �i t� -4. -c sY :Mr t 7"R q fr }. t{{, t. � �+'i� GHERR Y t ', 1 r o- a,- ti A s t Off, {0 > i{ +,;P v /®' i.A✓t Y1+I� a G p 1�•J}r YiI.Z '..Irl i Y� t Y dct �'rldp •pd4� 4" 192N .. 56�>I_ Y 'JP f Y 9 , I dP(,.I ,} F, 4 1 9t93RO.. (v p > i j t i r ,� r t,. i ? P wp py .. d Rt 3f Y f �' C,n�t• � EDNI' AFiOjb0?{f{q{{ .. �. C• d:. .Y Y t. r 74196T r, } j r tit ,r { ; , af Q) ''` � .t,,• e°�ir r ^'' J t•y lo': - i .,:ik ; i . E ( er C rgI P , } ��p•••^•• -, x .t3 _g •- .t; �pf�("P w` # i i t Gt'�6 i M� ryf� �` � �t.t�t rft d L .t t , I �•` r t9 �µ°•3 �. '1 I �9 Y.$. ` d• �1"., •Y�j .e:/:�t�ar; 1,V 4�1t�+` '�• ,Y i'Y' t£.d,' atn?. � '.d y'. d} a°s.i {E. r{`�•rv'_ a j ` +.� .'t<=•e VIS c 0 Ctj E ,L •. . �, � r A , :�' _ a 7e .. :� , -� I 10. , +alr.A, Arley. i'` e �: •DLO /; ..^ J• ,CLE N S R �.q ,�. r' ^,•'Y� tots : k 202NDTao 203RD� 'ff , i.tfl � �•'•+, ra �1,�• {� f 5 { i' 4 i� >(,r j "'- .•� A,j�'E. �- r F-I: �, ^� ^E dam: io �•t s,: �_ J t /� { � -L `tit,{ ` )y .r' c,„ �� rI BE , .• ; 4 p ' -•'G, +. ,. ~j ' � , � j , r 'il it.P.t j' 41 ti3.: ) '•� n :E� '�. h jMAI 11•L.I 'T"3;'st.;gC{{i 't jf� � '�� ?.Y J'g t+t' � �, r ` t ` n° i �•i t �, s , r ' P �. k ~ e,�� Th '✓j` 6 Q HO Y= CEDAR S 21 T YY( LrTsq , 214 l` d •a i r P74 .�`� +,, 7 v 216TH O�Y 4� t .11 ft+ + �.t V 2t5Ty +i771 $2T Y. 1 " G+ .sx A2-20TH 7 �j.t �, _ w' i Lj p 4 r 1 I Z if I ~ 2.2 222 D .: Ji r tx • .,1s '1.,1., t .�,- < F .P�'�,;Y• ,..:;i _ �.'h- < °ii?4n ao •, + •�J Yv� h J 1 7 t Ut, rd .7 , 474 j , ..� "s �.�•., ks u :.'s o ; _�� .-� z - j n .rx7• :'� O s _ N, M m _.� � CO a °`?✓ O i1 ! P d .228 :�. N TIT-7r, ©1995 Thomas Bros. Maps FIGURE Soundview Plaza 1 NELSON-COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS FILE NO. 195897 DATE January 1997 . AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS uranogduvaavic.car b b 1 +49.9 I 52 54 I i � NEW 8" RETAINING WALL I 1 �o� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 EXISTI �1 I GARAG 1 1 TO B I 1 1 I 1 REMOV I 1 1 1 1 TP-3 -'1'56 0 0 0 N W n o� b �o u 60 _911 ._._. _.�♦6t.3 b NEW ASPHALT PAVING 0 STING TREES bi 3E REMOVED -jib Site Plan 3UMED T NORTH LEGEND TP-1 NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST PIT 0 20 40 Approximate Scale: 1" = 20' NELSON-COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Soundview Plaza CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS FILE NO. architect. 195897 FIGURE 2 DATE January 1997 Z Q a N W CL' 3RD AVENUE , N 2508'27"E 120.00 ■ -r=------------ ----- I 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I EXISTING' HOUSE I TO BE REMOVED I 1 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 OPEN 1 I ------•--- ---_� r•--_- 1 1 ELEVATOR t EXISTING CONC. jl 1 ALL TO BEt EXIST' WREMOVED \:I , ,r-"'^ 1 GARAG U I TO B • I REMOV Z P TP'1 ;''ti TP-4 1•- � . 1 LjN 5811 _---_ I► 1 .. TP-3 41 r — _ _ — — — _ S 2708'2r W 120.00 - _ Z TRANSFORMER NEW ASPHALT PAVING --------ALLEY- (PAVEO) ISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED EXIST. CITY SIOEWALX 1 I� j 1 52.3 1 _! I �- 52 1 ' 34 I 1 1 I � 1 a 1 1 j 3 ( ' 06, , X 1 ice: Site Plan created from drawing titled Soundview Plaza, dated November 27, 1996, prepared by Warren Lafon Architect. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE - GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION GRAVEL SOILS RETAINED ON NO.4 SIEVE WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL l MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND MORE THAN 50% OF SAND COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND Sc CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC ML SILT FINE - CL CLAY GRAINED LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% SOILS ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT; ORGANIC CLAY MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS 1) Field classification is based on visual examination of soil In general Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry accordance With ASTM D 2488-83. to the touch Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D 2487-83. Wet- Visible free water or saturated, 3) Descriptions of soil density or usually soil is obtained from consistency are based on below water table interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or, test data. NELSON-COWRETTE&'ASSOCIATES, INc. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AMOENvIRONMENTALSCIENTISTS FIGURE 3 LOG OF EXPLORATION DEPTH USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT ONE 0.0 - 0.5 SM DARK BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS (LOOSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL) 0.5 - 7.0 SP-SM GRAY -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (LOOSE GRADES TO MEDIUM DENSE AT 2.0 FEET, MOIST) 7.0 - 7.5 SM TAN -GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) 7.5 - 10.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND TRACE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 6.0 AND 9.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 10.0 FEET ON 1-10-97 TEST PIT TWO 0.0 - 0.4 SM 0.4-2.3 SM 2.3 - 3.2 SP-SM 3:2 - 4.0 SM 4.0 - 4.5 SM TEST PIT THREE 0.0 - 0.5 SM 0.5 - 7.5 SP 7.5 - 8.0 1 SP-SM 8.0 - 9.0 SP 9.0 - 11.0 SP DJB DARK BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS (LOOSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL) ,ORANGE -BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (LOOSE, MOIST) GRAY -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) ORANGE -GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO WET) GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND TRACE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 3.0 AND 3.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 4.5 FEET ON 1-10-97 DARK BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS (LOOSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL) GRAY -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE SILT, ROOTS AND A BOULDER (LOOSE GRADES TO MEDIUM DENSE AT 4.0 FEET, MOIST) (FILL?) ORANGE -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL?) GRAY -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) GRAY MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO WET) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 2.0, 6.0 AND 10.0 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED MODERATE CAVING WAS ENCOUNTERED FROM 1.0 TO 6.0 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 11.0 FEET ON 1-10-97 NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 195897 FIGURE 4 LOG OF EXPLORATION DEPTH USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT FOUR 0.0 - 0.2 0.2 - 9.0 DJB SM DARK BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS (LOOSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL) SP-SM GRAY -BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT (LOOSE GRADES TO MEDIUM DENSE AT 3.0 FEET, MOIST) SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED AT 5.0 AND 9.0 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SLIGHT TO MODERATE CAVING WAS ENCOUNTERED FROM 0.0 TO 7.0 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.0 FEET ON 1-10-97 NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 195897 FIGURE 5 I STREET FILE STORM DRAINAGE REPORT for SOUNDVIEW PLAZA t-u OFFICE/CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX 116 3rd Avenue N prepared by John W. Mellor, P.E. WAS 0 0 OWAL I EXPIRES 2/24/99 T1.7-e1V -7 1/27/97 UNDEVELOPED SITE The subject property is 120' x 120' with the 120' front length along 3rd Ave N and the. 120' length between 3rd Ave N and the alley to the east. This property is moderately sloped with a topographical change from 62.5' near the midpoint'of the subject property, line adjacent to the alley to 49.9' at the NW corner of the subject property. This elevation change takes place over a distance of 141,.0' a vertical change of 12.6' with an average slope of 8.936%. The acreage of the subject property is: 120' x 120' = 14,400 sq. ft. = 0.3306 acres 43,560 43,560 The existing impervious surfaces presently on the subject site included an old house and walkway 1,100 sq ft(built prior to 1979) have been removed 1,100 sq ft '= 0.025 ac 43,560 sq ft/ac The existing pervious area of the subject site is covered with a short grass, and a few shrubs. The pervious area for this analysis will be the entire site and is 14,400 sq ft or 0.3306 acres CN values for the site: meadowsor pasture....................................................................................... 85 Time of Concentration for the Onsite Runoff Refer to the enclosed map: The runoff route consists of sheet flow from the SE corner of the property to the NW corner of the property then into the existing catch basin. Times of concentration are computed with the following equations for overland flow and open channel flow as follows: Tt 0.42 nsL 0,8, where So = slope of watercourses are (P2) (So) .4 12.6/141.0 = 8.936% L = length of watercourses are 141.0 ns= Manning's coeff 0.15 for areas with short grass P2= 2yr-24hr rainfall. = 1.50 1 Ttt = 0.42(0.15 x 141.0)0*4' = 4.8250 = 10.24 min = Tc - (��2T(0.08936)° 4 0.4713 pervious area CN impervious area . CN Tc V 0.3306 85 0.0 98 10.24 SBUH results are contained in the back of this report. DEVELOPED PROPERTY The developed property will contain a retail/office/condominium complex with parking contained within the building. The new structure will cover all but 480 of the 29jke'—site. 14,400 - 480 = 13,920 sq ft or 0.31956 ac of new impervious surfaces. The pervious surfaces will be lawn and landscaping; the remainder of the site 480 sq ft or 0.01102 acres The time of concentration for the developed site is based on the runoff time from the roof of the building, down rain gutters, and through the detention system Tt = 0.42 nsQ°.8, and V = k So , (P2) (SO)0.4 Tt = L = L 60V 60k So where Sot = slope of roof = 2.0833% L = length of roof run = 47.42' ns Manning's coeff. = 0.011 P2= 2yr-24hr rainfall = 1.50 n = 0.012 for DI subcollector S02 = slope of subcollector = 1.042% L = length of raingutter = 74.08' n = 0.012 for DI subcollector S03 = slope of collection line = 2.0% L = length of collection line = 4.0' n = 0.012 for PVC. collector Soo = slope of detention sys = 0.5% L = length of detention sys = 40' n = 0.024 for CMP detention Ttj = 0.42(0.011 x 47.42)0.8 = 0.2495 = 0.9480 min (1.5)""(0.020833)°'4 0.2632 Tt2 = 0.52 min(run in 74.08' of 4" DI subcollection piping@ 1.042%; 2.38fps). Tt3 = 0.02 min(run in 4' of 4" PVC collection piping @ 2.0%; 3.57fps) 2 Tt4 = 0.59 min(run in 40' of 12" CMP detention piping @, 0.50%; 1.13 fps) Tc=Tt,+Tt2+Tt3+Tt4=0.9480+0.52+0.02+0.59=2.08min pervious area CN impervious area CN Tc 0.0110 85 0.3196 98 2.08 SBUH results are at the back of this report Detention Requirements The added impervious surfaces are 13,922.sq ft requiring the use of the above SBUH analysis. The RDFAC analysis was run for a 48" CMP pipe. The analysis indicates a total storage capacity requirement of 432 cu ft. A 25' section of 54" CMP will be used. Checkinq Detention Capacity A section of 48" pipe 25' in length will provide 351.848 cu ft of storage. Additional storage will be provided by a 48" Type II catch basin with restrictor with a live storage depth of 4.14'. The Type I-L catch basin adds 5.778 cu ft/ft x 4.00' ft = 23.112 cu ft. The storage of the entire 48" CMP detention system is 443.083 cu ft, which is in excess of the required 432.000 cu ft. 48" CB live storage depth 4.140 ft x 12.566 cu ft/ft.................................... 52.023 cu ft 2'(30" CMP) x 4.909 cu ft/ft.......................................................................... 9.817 cu ft 28'(48" CMP) x 12.566 cu ft/ft .................................................................. 351.848 cu ft 2'(24" CMP) x 3.1416 cu ft/ft........................................................................ 6.283 cu ft Type I - L CB live storage depth 4.00 ft x 5.778 cu ft/ft ............................ 23.112 cu ft 443.083 cu ft Water Quality Addressing water quality concerns is not necessary due to the parking area being under cover and not exposed to the weather. Any water brought into the parking areas will be run into an oil/water separator before being discharged directed to the sanitary sewer. Offsite Drainage / Offsite runoff has little or no impact.on this project. 3 Check Riser Overflow Capacity The flow to check is the 100 year storm, Qloo = 0.29 cfs. From the formula . QI.IR = 9.739DH31 ; where Q is in cfs, D is in feet(dia) and H in feet, an 6 inch riser can discharge 1.7216 cfs, with 6" of head Therefore 0.29 cfs is a conservative discharge. 4 S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.3306,85,0.0,98,10.24 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 1904 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ10OU SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0.0110,85,0.3196,98,2.08 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 85.0 .3 98.0 2.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .29 7.67 3276 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ100D SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P.- PRINT, S - STOP 1 S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ,ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A"(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 _ 0.3306,85,0.0,98,10.24 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 953 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ01OU SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0.0110,85,0.3196,98,2.08 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES), PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 ..0 85.0 .3 98.0 2.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .19 7.67 2091 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ010D SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P.- PRINT, S - STOP • SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1 x ! r 1) TYPE,OF FACILITY: TANK 2)-TANK DIAMETER(ft), STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 4.00, 4.00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME:' MKEZ100D 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .13 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD.1 FILENAME: MKEZOIOD TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .06 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: MKEZ100D TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .13 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 4.00, 6 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: YES ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS,ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES.: 1263C BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) 0.081 DIA.= 1.22 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.30 DIA.= 1.18 INCHES ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... TRIAL TANK -LENGTH STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 100.5 1263 .693 2.16 :06 2 -77.9. 978 618 2.42 .08 3 63.5 798 565 2.67 .09 4 54.3 681 530 2.91 .10 5 48.2 606 504' 3.11 .10 6 44.2 555 485 3.27 .11 7 41.4 520 472 3.42 .11 8 39.5 496 462 3.53 .12 9 38.1 479 455 3.61 .12 10 37.2 467 449 3.71 .12 11 36.5 458 445 3.78 .12 .12 35.9 451 441 3.83 .13' 13 35.6 446 439 3.88 .13 14 35.3 443 437 3.91 .13 15 35.1 440 436 3.93 .13 16 34.9 438 .435 3.95 .13 17 34.8 437 434 3.96 .13 18 34.7 435 434 3.97 .13 19 34.6 434 433 3.98 .13 20 34.6 434 433 3.98 .13 21 34.5 433 432 3.99 .13 22. 34.5 433 432 3.99 .13 23 34.5 433, 432 3.99 .13 24 34.4 432 432 3.99 .13 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET=OU&TFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: ..29 .13 .13 3.99 432 TEST HYD 1: .19 .06 .06 2.33 260 TEST HYD 2: .29 .13 .13 3.99 430 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE,A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STO 9707160503 RETURN ADDRESS: 0 7/ 16 / 9 7 14 : 5 7 p.0002 Recorded CityofEdmonds, City Clerk Snohomish County 121 5th Avenue -No. Edmonds, WA 98020 AUG - 8 1997 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT EXITING SCHEMATIC Reference #: Building Permit # Grantor(s): (1) Jim Markezinis (2) Grantee(s):_ City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec Twn Rng Qtr OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 4344-006-010-0002 (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned WHEREAS, aim Markezinis are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address: 110 Third Avenue North Edmonds Legal Description: LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 6., PLAT OF EDMONDS , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 215 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON tLssessor•s lax rarcel 11) # (s): #4344-006-010-0002 for 110 Third Avenue North Edmonds WA WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of utilizing an exterior exit court design as permitted by Uniform Building Code Chapter,10, upon said premises and are agreeable to imposing a restrictive covenant in order for the Building Official to approve such a condition and whereas, the City is concerned that future owners understand the building code conditions in approving such an exterior exit court design, the following covenant is established. r , j RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue No. Edmonds, WA 98020 WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named .owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to - wit: That at the time of the: execution of this Covenant the Grantors have chosen to utilize an exterior exit court design, for 3rd floor exiting, (as required by Uniform Building Code 310.4) pursuant to Uniform Building Code Chapter 10, and that the referenced exterior exit court shall remain open to fresh outside air and shall not be enclosed temporary or permanently by walls, partitions; roofs or other combination of materials that prevents such fresh outside air from freely flowing through all areas designated as exterior exit court areas, UNTIL OR UNLESS, 1) the State Building Code is amended in such a way to allow such enclosure or 2) an alternate means of exiting is provided. Current and future owners shall adhere to the approved plans for the subject building on file with the City of Edmonds and no changes to the exiting system shall be made without approval by the City of Edmonds Building Official. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. DATED this ,rr day of GRANTOR GRANTOR State of Washington J. )ss County of 1 1-0 I certify that I know o.r.have satisfactoryevidence that �- �l ' .,�%6�"1 ,, !QG' G�ll')�� signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the —AWL (title) of A� (name of party on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntarll! o SysMrty for the uses and purposes mention lin this instrument. Subscribed and swo ;�i�� lip day of % �Lcz.G� , 19 �;� '�ye;.9G: �4.co (Mall Notary Public in an4 for the State of W 9707160503 neton. pI/BLX TX wee 414JliMi18N`�� l'�r ... ...ts• . � t...(.. ...Hnsrtz-�:-�.4 .... J'-t.�1'v -f �y � .ti.�:k ujv'^x`LsJ'4c_.`.P.��.K�d4C,!`��1 .J;� �st<.-"'Y"'�t�:.n�:%�{.el:.�' Y... h' :1t �' �.�^.�is::. ..� .�.�::�. � r ... City.. of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION 7.. PERMIT Permit Number. Issue Date: / 2 i A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: _ t - 3o Ll n� .1g9 p B. Type of Work (be specific): C. Contractor: r,Q®� Contact: Mailing Address: Q- � `-� .,�_ Phone: State License #: C_ e Q 2 :A. � Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit ll (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. mmercial Subdivision t ❑ ❑ City Project ❑Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR:= INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: LIA< ❑Nos-._=.., G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMA TED RESTORA T/ON FEES WILL BE HELD UNTII THE FINAL STREET PA TCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. ` Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the.abo ev stag nts rya understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be availabl��te at alUimes fqr-inspe tion purposes._ Date: or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER A�4aerin Q9 DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1� ,, ,k -, j,n x _,,i 6.-e RIGHT OF WAY FEE: 3 o DISRUPTION FEEIFUND I 1 l: RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: p 70 RECEIPT NO.: 1 2- p ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. 1997 I i I, ROUND SOLID LOCKING LID FADJUST FRAME AND GRATE SUCH THAT RESTRICTOR/ POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE 56.64 IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER STEPS. A , c < OVERFLOW `%- I I: T EL= 54.00 HANDLE PIPE SUPPORTS (2MIN.) 41 3" X 0.090" ALUMINUM W/ ' 518" STAINLESS BOLTS a: 48 " 24" 2.30' OUTLET IE= 49.85 NOTE: ALL STET-L PARTS AND 2' Min. SURFACES MUS BE GALVANIZED AND ASPHALT COATED (TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER). COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED. RE•STRICTOR PLATE WITH 1.18" DIA. ORIFICE CUT IN F LATE, MACHINE. DRILLED, SHARP .=DGED ORIFICE. RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH 1.22" DIA. ORIFICE CUT IN PLATE, MACHINE DRILLED, SHARP EDGED ORIFICE. 30" I I - 0.590 FROP - Tr ' SHEAR GATE SEE DETAIL - 2' Min. a ° 2' Min. 48" TYPE .I1 SECTION "A -A" STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM PROFII E IE -45.95 @ CONNECTION w/ SEWER /-CLEANOUT I CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. ARRANGE FOR A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY OF EDMONDS SITE INSPECTION, (206)771 -0220. 2. CALL DIALDIG(UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER)1-800-424-5555. 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES; REFER TO T.E.S.C.P. NOTE BEAW. 4. INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SEWER, STORM . DRAINAGE, WATER, POWER, TELEPHONE, ETC.. 5. COMPLETE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ` 6. CLEAN UP STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. P m GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S,'D.O.T./A.P.W.A. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. ; 2. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN A RE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCA�IONS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. 3. ALL INLET AND CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATES SHALL NOT BE ADJUSTED UNTIL IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PAVING. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FA:,ILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCOPDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTAL FOR ON SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. ALL REQUIRED STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO ANY PAVING UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 6. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NOT ON PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. 7. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH TOUGH, HARDY, FAST GROWING GRASS UNLESS LANDSCAPPING/EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EMFLOYED. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPING 8", 12", 18, 24, 36", 48, & 54 INCLUDING DETENTION PIPE WILL BE 16 GAUGE GALVAVIZED STEEL AND SHALL USE TREATMENT 1. 9. GRASS SEEDING WILL BE DONE USING AN APPROVED -TYPE HYDRO -SEEDER, OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS"' THE PERFORMANCE BOND WILL NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL THE GRASS IS ESTABLISHED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 0 10. PIPING SPECIFICATIONS AS NOTED. 11. ALL STEEL PARTS WILL BE GALVANIZED AND. ,WITH TREATMENT #1(ASPHALT COATED). 12. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ISE\11/ER, WATER, AND UNDERGROUND POWER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSi.FOR SUCH WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.U.D1, STANDARDS. I EXIST SEWER INSTALL 2 - 8" x 5.5' BOLLARDS ALLEY SURFACE TO BE INSPERi:.Q BY 16' ALLEY AT 2 CORNERS POWER VAULT CITY ENGINEER; OVERLAY AS Ri:.QUIRED. _�-EXIST LAMPHOLE x APIPE 08'27" W - 120.00' PROP POWER VAULT CB# 1 , TYPE 1 -L GE 60.40 IE 50.01 x w 8.5% /. 2' 24" CMP @ 0.5% INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG x USE `' 60' i 5'(center• tank to bldg) .5'NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO Co '48" CMP 0.5% ._ ................��.Jn= w 60NI =Iw I 230" CMP @ '0.5% GE'...49.60 o .. O ox ` I w" HIGH POINT _ 1 ....... ELEV 5 0.00........ o to M ............:................ . : ............... HIGH :POINT CB#2, 48" TYPE 2, W/6" RISER ' o GE 56.64 OE 54.00 N IE 49.85 81.75 6" PVC 0 2.1 6% r� CLAIRE'S ELEV.:50.30,.., z PANTRY ROCK �:.. ,.....: CONSTRUCTION x 5................................................... ' ENTRANCE i .,........ ...:,... 34 1 .... ...... . ............................................... ....... ......... B TYP E �,....... :� G 9.10 :cp191 IE 48.08 Q Q.....; :::. g0'N 29'08'27' E 1 O'g�`� 1 .79 EXIST. P.P. 2 EXIST WM 80 goo pig • � � �. � •..... �.,...,:..........' ..: 9 • �r��o� . g 6 19 JO A I 9 3 ... s 70 EXIST STORM SEWER NEW DIRIVEWAY 20 8" CMP 2.12% EXIST CB J EXIST WATER MAIN APPROACH EXIST SIGN 4 NO 3rd AVENUE N. PARKING SIDEWALK, CURB, & GUTTER TO LOADING BE INSPECTED BY CITY ENGINEER; PROPOSED PARKING ZONE INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG BACK OF REPLACE AS REQUIRED. SIDEWALK AFTER REMOVAL OF EXIST. _ STRIPE ' EXIST. YELLOW ZONE, 8.5FROM CURB 5 I � PAINT YELLOW v10` "NO LOADING" RETAINING WALL. rI-Ir AS SHOWN W2i® m - zL- - - HARD SURFACE ROAD 0 10 R i cn O 0 F 4"-6" QUARRY Z C R SPALLS ® 12" MIN DEPTH a _®IMIN � ROCK CON STRU CTI.ON ENTRANCE N.T.S. I I I I I 1 I I ' I I I I�1 K� STUN-�- I 1 --- ---- + I 1 I I v 1 MEOW I I I I i I I I I I I I I ----------�-- 20 0 20 40 VICINITY MAP NOTE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION of EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION 0- BMP'S, INCLUDING BUT 1`40T LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION,- PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMP'S SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS, SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 TO THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINUOUS ROLI_.S. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE. WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE -FOR SLIT FILM FABRICS, WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE FOR SKIT FILM FABRICS --\ FILTER FABRIC NMATERIAL PROVIDE WASHED/GRAVEL BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL BACKFILL OR COMPACTED !N 8 BY 12 TRENCH NATIVE SOIL AS DIRECTED --4�--______�__-��_' BY ENGINEER N 6' MAX- ! i BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN U~ 2" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, �� 6" BY 12" TRENCH STANDARD OR BET -TER OR EQUIVALENT 2" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, STANDARD OR BETTER EL-EVATI O.N OR EQUIVALENT �I LT FENCE DETAIL N. T. S. SECTION cn w m H W <C W Z CO U � o UU ''j' W O O mLO En .;i z (n C3 v?00 v� w W r W a a Q s if M J N cm N a 2yO� Q - c- Lj • � U W c: w Z Z 0 �r p, LLJ W 1-- < � 0 z 0 ILI m w 0 L 0 0 0 m m z o a S 0 0 Ld N Q 0 0 o n Z 000 Z W c 9 � z Q m Ld ui W> Q U Z dZ Z 0 o In J J a o z C_ N N C 1- N II w w = w 0 . In o 1 = aSCE VED JUL- 3 1997 pfRMIT COUNTER 2 Eff 51TE SECTIONS SCALE: P=10' 11 A2 3rd AVE. N. III PM Al CURB CUT PER EDMONDS STANDARDS 49. 6 aRA55 fRIN6 49.6) 1 i--FIRST FL. ELEV. 814' PIN EXIST. CITY SIDEWALK .9. SIDEWALK ELEVZ BM - PLATE 4 JEXIST. FrP-IN IN 45f-14ALT 49.8 49.81 N 2 9'0 8'2 7 E 120.00 49.9'__ nu.u- 5?.3 "P49.9 _7 52 5 ------ -- ---- --- 54 NEW 8" RETAINING WALL Ld 56 10' 0' Lij C)" B CD C; EXISTING HOUSE 58 loo B 2 TO BE REMOVED LAJ cy) lo'-o b CID OPEN 160 EXISTING CONC.--� WALL TO BE RETAINED Lu 58 N TRANSFORMER ELEVATOR EXISTIN 3 METAL ROOFING (TYP.) GARAG TO B ROOFING CLASS "B" REMOV ,I u J•o 'vN 60 61 - — - ."1 - — - — - — - — - — - — - -7 - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - . . . . . . S 29'08'27W 120.00 NEW ASPHALT PAVING z NEW ASPHALT PAVING EXIST. CONC. WALL co TO BE REMOVED ALLEY (PAVED) EXISTING TREES A 2 TO BE REMOVED I. V. SITE PLAN SCALE; P=10' "Nothing in this permit approval proeml be interpreted ashal s allowing or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconfurming or unpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the permit application, regardless of whether such building, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate enforcement action." RF—C:F—Q'VF'® MAR 2 6 2007 BUILDING DEPT. BRICK WALL i" DIA GALVANIZED METAL STUDS H SILICONE ADHESIVE FORMED PLASTIC LETTERS MOUNTING DETAIL NO SCALE RECEIVED f,IAR 12 2007 BUILDING DEPT, customer. coritact: date: 425-775-9709 9 imroice#: revision#: 2921 Aiderwood Mall BLVD, Lynnwood, WA 98036 Sign & Computer generated colas in this sketch may not match thefinished sign colors. scale: customer approval: drawn by. 0This sketch is the property of FASTSIGNS of Lynnwood. Any reproduction is prohibited Solutions Made Simple. AS NOTED GO NG D 3Izzto� ❑2003 Edition IRC w/WAC Amendments W2003 Edition IBC w/WAC Amendments ❑2003 Edition UPC w/WAC Amendments and Appendices A, B, Q I 132003 Edition IMC w/WAC Amendments ❑2003 Edition IFGC w/WAC Amendments 132003 Edition IFC w/WAC Amendments 132003 Edition VIAQ WAC 51-13 132004 Edition WSEC WAC 5 1 -11 Ci`i Y Qr ED�fICd�'DS BUILDING DERARTIV-ENT WORK MMIER n, rnuj U. PERMijr Nub �� 1) Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other )1 adfromtraadopted deviation odes, (hereinafter `.`variance) specifically ordinances or policies must be sP and be called out and requested in writing identified. processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non -refundtblor p plan containing 2) Approval of any ot comply with city code and provisions which do n for which a variance has not been specificallythe identified, requested and considered by appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. RECEIVED MAR 12 2007 BUILDING DEPT. S'TREET FILE PLAN NING DATA STREET FILE -- Signs -- Name: R ec-GchveS Date: 3_ —?j_d7 Site Address: I O _ 3`a( AV N I' Plan Check #: BLD 2oe7 oa9 y Project Description: C Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES O) [Zoning: 4 2— Comprehensive Plan Designation: Map Page: Corner Lot: (YES NO) Flag Lot: (YE CINJO) ADB File # (or date waived): TOTAL AI -ea per T of Si n Allowed in Matrix Allowed TOTAL sign area Proposed Type of Sign zone? conditions area per Unit allowed for sign area met? unit this si n Example flu minnaall internal illu Yes, withtion conditions Yes 1 sq. R./lineal R. attached wall tt attached w 41 square feet 20 square feet wall Sign #1 Affa tie4 W%A Md1v1dW S .es r IZ�+emu Sign #2 Sign #3 I` TOTAL Sign Area for 'Tenan41Site Max Permitted: [Previous Total: Proposed Total: Sign Hei ht ,Al"' Sign Type: � fV� e �G>{if�r5 Max Permitted: I ctual Height: 1q, Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sin Li htin Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: PLANNING DATA -- Signs -- STREET FILE Si n'Coiors Proposed: Acceptable? Requires ADB Approval? Sin Location: If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a. fence) meets setbacks? Re wired Setbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: �_. Actualsetbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: Landsca in for. Freestanding Si ns Size: Location: Critical Areas Determination #: ❑ Study .Required ❑ waiver Other . Plan Review By: b. Required/Allowed Proposed Sign Height: Attached: Maximum 14 feet Letters at 13 feet 9 inches Logos at 16 feet Sign Area: Total Attached and Projecting Building Sign 7.9 sq. ft. for the Building: Hagen Firm 17.8 1 sq.ft. sign /1 lineal ft. of the GMC 15.3 "wall containing the main public entrance to the business" ECDC Total Signs = 41.0 sq. ft. 20.60.020.C.2. = 110 sq.ft. � I "The maximum sign area may be divided between attached, �, L freestanding and first floor ✓(�`� window signs." ECDC 20.60.020.C.3 S 4. Technical Review: No comments have been received. However, it is the responsibility of,/�I��l%7 the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in City ordinances. �f E. Compliance with criteria: In order for the ADB to approve this item, the Board must make the following findings: 1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies. 2. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance, or the city has approved a variance or a modification under the zoning ordinance. 3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes of ECDC section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section 20.60, sign code. F. Summary: 1. The Comprehensive Plan and the Urban Design Guidelines both encourage signs oriented to pedestrians, which all the signs will be. Therefore, the proposal is generally consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted policies. 2. The proposal is consistent with use requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, except for the height of the logos. The applicant can choose to either move the logos below the 14 foot level, or pursue a variance to sign height. 3. The proposal appears to be consistent with the requirements of the criteria of ECDC sections 20.10, 20.12 and 20.60, except for the height of the logos as proposed. 4. If the Architectural Design Board wishes to approve this proposal, the following should be addressed: • Sign height may not exceed 14 feet without a variance being approved. If the Architectural Design Board is comfortable having the logos placed adjacent to the letters instead of above them, they may wish to state that as an acceptable alternative. ADB-2000-2.doc / 01/ 25/00 Page 2 E.} . f #.eh�{ Si •-�, - S rf t` fF �. r t ;.i .. � � F, ,i. S 89D 19.9� w- Citk 0UEdi non&' ___...._ Critical Areas. Ghecklist.r-... ,. The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and. identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site Plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary amassment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: J1AA M4AeXGztA1t_5 Name Street Address City, State, ZIP _ I ' , Phone Applicant Representative: WMZ9gmy �:5H TEU% Name Z 4L �y Street Address _��hS 71�-a58a City, State, ZIP %� . . Phone Signature Date Signahue $.6.941 �. ._ .... Date , • a s,_-,Iy a ; M .:a. - - CA FILE NO. rp . Critical Areas Checklist Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) Site Address/Location: /1412 3 �m�, Iy• 2. Property Tax Account Number: D/a - C60 Z 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): lei i4ag 5r- • . 4. Is this site currently developed? X -yes; no. If yes; how is site developed?'' `-° S F ? JZ&6tP NG5_:: 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Z4 6 %q96 Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site: " >' �( Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a " horizontal distance of 66-few). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). t Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: � ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: G ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? S. Site is in the floodway A116 floodplain of a water course.. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? 4/4 Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ;meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: A/0 =1 i0 MEMORANDUM goo 1? a� Date: July 11, 2002 To: . Building-Lara Knaak, Fire -Mike Smith, Planning -Star Campbell Cc: City Clerk -Sandy Chase I fi From: Mayumi Wilson' / , � �Yv Subject: Premises Expansion: Guaranty Mortgage Corp/Compass Mtg, LLC, Business License #5558 Barb Schliesman, Accounts Payable, Guaranty Mortgage Corp/Compass Mtg, LLC, informed our office today that the above business, licensed at 110 3rd Ave. N., Suite 202, has expanded their operation to include Suite 102 formerly occupied by Abbie's Lighthouse. A copy of the current file is attached. d:\wordata\buslic\opnolic\guarantymortgagecompass.doc City of Edmonds C9 Administrative Services nn it ILE "BUSINESS„LICENSE RENEWAL .DATE m=' Jivi Sion LICENSE e;N INSTRUCTIONS`. ',NUMBER 5559' WA 98020 4 Pleese ad se f-license will not be renewed ]]52525 y.:New licensearequiretld businesschanges addrass or ownersnip b '-Plea$e complete:all partmulars in full S gn`and:refurn with fee II,a ?ReFLPJIneLNals ieILI' IIIceiJeO afteA It,r February-.15 must pay penally m adtlill0n to fee GUARANTY MORTGAGE CO ECEIVEzD 110 3RD AV N (.e� EDMONDS02WA 98020 I �tl'f�d'>' JAN 2 9 20u2 EDMONDS CITY CLERK E. .. _a'e032.i... t4,�. -Y`5: .r IF IT :d ..:It:« *=M ra: . ... BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL FEE PENALTY FOR RENEWAL a- o TYPE OF BUSINESS RENEWAL FEE AFTERFEBRUARVIS CLss��s YEAR ULsxsE FF DaTE DATE PA ❑A Home Occupation $25.00 $12.50+ III Renewal=$37.50 .b � 'E i+B Commercial $25.00 $12.50+$25.WRenewal=$37.50 NEI uueART P PFIP1 a Tv nu ``' W OB AparkneM House $25.D0 $12.50+ III Renews] 1$37.50 b' G'N Non -Profit aempt MFIIED 1— DELETED r UARAN TY MOR irA�GE�G��u �I�61 67�3599 � 17 'd0206 ws. o n ""m"""� :.: G. 1�r ��P �--"" = wEo�eus Ex"'ss �7639 '""•"'"u' 110 RD. AV N 93020 SUI�4TE 202 M_DRTGAGE QANKER AND ivioAPoliFas"Ro •.. m"'�`s"iPeETG`B'uew — �r•••,�•"� ••��n �.• y�^%d�-`siASE zivSTAFF FOOTAGE 310 3RD AV N SVITE 202 EDMONDB TiYJ WA 93020 3000 ❑ISI SOLE'PROQ{ilE70PS�ly uE M M ZIP PROVE My SrT &� FIRM VAIOaPmry ) t. ❑ IPIPARTNERSHI,p I. - w we FIRST IG _P FnWH549LW i F STREET •—'�'��@��a-am�®a++. _ PT SO IS A E EF N SITE.XMaE MOHE. aaa-ssa a+mv.s+w. OF SAFE PNE as �• PIpCEKMAT LASTeNANS 'I ONES nP9 xi . I, TIP_''pAp, ll laWP 55 fOGi¢.�v._-.-_aw. F�.. STATE ZIP 1p I k'E w•"m v+�-me .u�� P`HOMEPTOME• -"RE OF 9PM iawrvcmxnum�.r P tl! All .1 1C09PORA/ ® ICI CTION` on NAME F WProaarw G THEME NUMBER GE) Y MO U$13-i13- S 4'25Nj 672 3599 Imt 10 4- _ �110 MEN SAME LW II ',�,.' IT K L T OPERATIONS ML,R for _RDAIINE�AULaT ,OWNER MIKINLEY BILL � w`M E j f0 1 iv r 1 VI-CE 4B: ES EMERGENCNNOTIFICATION "MANE;)TOWNSEND JIMI 425) 239-6341 FORPREMISEAGCE55 .. IN EMERGENCY- ;(2)�MCK INLEY BILL ;.:.( 206) 795-7549^ APPLICANT'S BUSINESS , X TITLE j DATE � SIGNATURE /�CJ�f _-A'-�„�.�t,",. s.,yytyg.�- \\) e;YA . _ l a:1 011 I MEMORANDUM Date: January 7, 1999 To: Jim Walker, City Engineer From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer qt g- Subject: Revised parking plan for Soundview Plaza at 110 — 3`d Ave. N. (Building permit 970575) Attached is a copy of the building permit, approved for engineering by Jamal Mahmoud on July 1, 1947. Also, please see a portion of the cover sheet for the architectural plans showing that 32 parking spaces are required and 33 parking spaces are being provided. I am also attaching copies of the approved architectural plans showing parking in the basement and the recently submitted revised second floor parking with "as -built" dimensions based upon my field measurements. The second floor parking is striped (and constructed) not in conformance with the plan. With the exception of the barrier free parking stall, there is only one stall that meets the ECDC mandated stall size of 8'-6" by 16'-6" minimum. I cannot, in good faith, recommend to you that you approve these requested revisions. I am also forwarding to you Jamal's memo reviewing the revisions and alley access revisions, stating that he has "no comment." City of Edmonds Development Services Department Engineering Division t t IE ^-45.95 @ CONNECTION w/ SEWER �CLEANOUT ALLEY SURFACE TO BE INSPEC' ED BY CITY ENGINEER; OVERLAY AS Ri:.QUIRED. 1 6' ALLEY S 29'08'27" W - 120.00' INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG USE D.I. PIPE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO CLEANOUT- 7 rMrjs IoN5 reoM A P PR-D✓O A&-14 I TMT S ? La+J . ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE — 25-SA OIL/WATER" SEPARATOR GE..,49.60 ®MIM- 111 22.5' z �u o 50 =w o=,W 0 0 0 N I w _/'EX SEWER OD 8.5' i 7 N 15— 75 147 , �. 60' 60' cli SCALE [ 5 5 P^ .,.v W tNS 58' INSTALL 2 - 8" x 5.5' BOLLARDS SAT 2 CORNERS POWER VAULT /-- EXIST = -- LAMPHOLt PROP POWER VAULT CB# 1, TYP�1-L GE 60.40 IE 50.01 2' 24" CMP @ 0.5%, 5'(center tank to bldg)� 28' 48" CMP @ 0.5% 2' 30" CMP @ 0.5% `—CB#2, 48" TYPE 2, W/6" RISER \ 56.64 0 OEE 54.00 IE 49.85 81.75' 6" PVC 0 2.16% \ I 5 6' ... i� r7 o CLAIRE'S Z PANTRY ....................................... W Cif () 52......... ... CB#3, TYPE 1 E _Z, IE 48.08 Q —O uiiii�ii o r� EXIST. P.P. R9' q9 �q9 N 29'08'27' E - 120' g9 �9') 9a -% •` `;' . 2 EXIST WM o goo Gg l 5 �, (6fp�j ...:;-... ._. ...,........... .: 9• ire o�. 0 A9gl 93 � 9 70 ......... EXIST STORM SEWER R��oJ NEW C�RIVEWAY EXIST WATER MAIN I 20 8" CMP @ 2.12% EXIST CB APPROACH EXIST SIN . G —I}- NO PARKING SIDEWALK, CURB, & GUTTER TO 3rd AVENUE N. LOADING BE INSPECTED BY CITY ENGINEER; ZONE INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG BACK OF REPLACE AS REQUIRED. PROPOSED PARKING 5' PAINT YELLOW �lO` STRIPE, 8.5' FROM CURB EXIST. YELLOW ZONE SIDEWALK AFTER REMOVAL OF EXIST. RETAINING WALL. —�� AS SHOWN "NO LOADING" HARD Sl, RO,K CONSTR ASIC WINDSPEED r .80..mph (exposure B) SITE AREA 120'0" x 12O'0" = 14,400sf SITE COVERAGE 11,880 SF PARKING, CARS REQ'D. RETAIL 4410 Sr @ 300 = 15 CARS OFFICE . r64-5T SF @ 800 — 7'8' CARS ft"CONDOS . t5"&jLo= 10.8' CARS h. 3vX CARS CARS SHOWN CARS OCCUPANCY RATIO OFFICE/RETAIL = 11,080.5 SF = 52.2% CONDOS = 10,127 SF = 47.8% C- I rt ri r, Pl A P1 1 ► 1 /1 3250 CUBIC YARDS HEIGHT GALCS. NW 49.9 NE = 61..3 SE = 6Q.6 SW 52.3 ` 224.1=4 = 56.025 -25.000 81.025. MAX. @ PLATE LINE + 5.000. 86.025 . MAX. @ PITCHED ROOF O DO( --� WAS WIN 101 RO° CEt — ._.._..—.._.._.._.._.._.:_..— PR --------------------------------- HID --- —=---- ---- -=--- DE _— - - - - -- - --- - -- - --- G RI --= -- -- -- --- SEG STREET FILE STORM DRAINAGE REPORT for SOUNDVIEW- PLAZA an OFFICE/CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX 116 3rd Avenue N prepared by John W. Mellor, P.E. WAS N, Vonivtw �wv Lnp-ims 2/24/,912 -7 1/27/97 • C] UNDEVELOPED SITE The subject property is 120' x 120' with the 120' front length along 3rd Ave N and the. 120' length between 3rd Ave N and the alley to the east. This property is moderately sloped with a topographical change from 62.5' near the midpoint of the subject property line adjacent to the alley to 49.9' at the NW corner of the subject property. This elevation change takes place over a distance of 141.0' a vertical change of 12.6' with an average slope of 8.936%. The acreage of the subject property is: 120' x 120' = 14,400 sq. ft. = 0.3306 acres 43,560 43,560 The existing impervious surfaces presently on the subject site included an old house and walkway 1,100 sq ft(built prior to 1979) have been removed 1,100 sg ft = 0.025 ac 43,560 sq ft/ac The existing pervious area of the subject site is covered with a short grass, and a few shrubs. The pervious area for this analysis will be the entire site and is 14,400 sq ft or 0.3306 acres CN values for the site: meadowsor pasture....................................................................................... 85 Time of Concentration for the Onsite Runoff Refer to the enclosed map: The runoff route consists of sheet flow from the SE corner of the property to the NW corner of the property then into the existing catch basin. Times of concentration are computed with the following equations for overland flow and open channel flow as follows: Tt = 0.42 ns!Y e where So slope of watercourses are T2) (SO) .4 12.6/141.0 = 8.936% L = length of watercourses are 141.0 ns= Manning's coeff 0.15 for areas with short grass P2= 2yr-24hr rainfall = 1.50 Ttj = 0.42(0.15 x 141.0)0 8 = 4.8250 = 10.24 min = Tc (1.5) U-01-T(0.08936)0-4 0.4713 pervious area CN impervious area CN .Tc 0.3306 85 0.0 98 10.24 SBUH results are contained in the back of this report. DEVELOPED PROPERTY The developed property will contain a retail/office/condominium complex with parking contained within the building. The new structure will cover all but 480 of the e�n m site. 14,400 - 480 = 13,920 sq ftor 0.31956 ac of new impervious surfaces. The pervious surfaces will be lawn and landscaping; . the remainder of the site 480 sq ft or 0.01102 acres The time of concentration for the developed site is based on the runoff time from the roof of the building, down rain gutters, and through the detention. system Tt = 0.42 nsl°.8, and V = k So , (P0 (So) o.a Tt = L = L 60V 60k So where Sol = slope of roof = 2.0833% L = length of roof run = 47.42' . ns= Manning's coeff. = 0.011 P2= 2yr-24hr rainfall = 1.50 n = 0.012 for DI subcollector Sot = slope of subcollector = 1.042% L = length of raingutter = 74.08' n = 0.012 for DI subcollector S03 = slope of collection line = 2.0% L = length of collection line = 4.0' n = 0.012 for PVC collector Soa =. slope of detention sys = 0.5% L = length of detention sys = 40' n = 0.024 for CMP detention Ttj = 0.42(0.011 x 47.42) 0.8 = 0.2495 = 0.9480 min (1.5 �'/(0.020833)0-4 .0.2632 Tt2 = 0.52 min(run in 74.08' of 4" DI subcollection piping@ 1.042%; 2.38fps) Tt3 = 0.02 min(run in 4' of 4" PVC collection piping @ 2.0%; 3.57fps) 04, • • Tt4 = 0.59 min(run in 40' of 12" CMP detention piping @ 0.50%; 1.13 fps) Tc = Tt, + Ttz + Tt3.+ Tt4 = 0.9480 + 0.52 + 0.02 + 0.59 = 2.08 min pervious area CN impervious area CN Tc 0.0110 85 0.3196 98 2.08 SBUH results are at the back of this report Detention Requirements The added impervious surfaces are 13,922 sq ft requiring the'use of the above SBUH analysis. The RDFAC analysis was run for a 48" CMP pipe. The analysis indicates a total storage capacity requirement of 432 cu ft. A, 25' section of 54 CMP will be used. Checking Detention Capacity A section of 48" pipe 25' in length will provide 351.848 cu ft of storage. Additional storage will be provided by a 48" Type 11 catch basin with restrictor with. a live storage depth of 4.14'. The Type 1-L catch basin adds 5.778 cu ft/ft x 4.00' ft = 23.112 cu ft. The storage of the entire 48" CMP detention system is 443.083 cu ft, which is in excess of the required 432.000 cu ft. 48" CB live storage depth 4.140 ft x 12.566 cu ft/ft .................................... 52.023 cu ft 2'(30" CMP) x 4.909 cu ft/ft ................. .............. 9.817 cu ft 28'(48" CMP) x 12.566 cu ft/ft .................................................................. 351.848 cu ft 2'(24" CMP) x 3.1416 cu ft/ft .....:.......... ................. 6.283 cu ft ....................................... Type I - L CB live storage depth 4.00 ft x 5.778 cu ft/ft ............................ 23.112 cu ft 443.083 cu ft Water Quality Addressing water quality concerns is not necessary due to the parking area being under cover and not exposed to the weather. Any water brought into the parking areas will be run into an oil/water separator before being discharged directed to the sanitary sewer. Offsite Drainage Offsite runoff has little or no impact on this project. 3 Check Riser Overflow Capacity The flow to check'is the 100 year storm, Qaoo = 0.29 cfs. From the formula QWEiR =9.739DH3/2 ; where Q is in cfs, D is in feet(dia) and H in feet, an 6 inch riser can discharge 1.7216 cfs, with 6" of head Therefore 0.29 cfs is a conservative discharge. 4 S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3.0 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** *********,100=YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.3306,85,0.0,98,.10.24 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 ..0 98.0 10.2 PEAK-Q(CFS), T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 1904 ENTER [d:]['pat.h]filename[.ext]' FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ100U SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV)', CN(PERV), A(IMPERV),-CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0.0110,85,0.3196,98,2.08 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) , :3 PEAK-Q(CFS) .29 PERVIOUS A CN .0 85.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A CN .3 98.0 VOL (CU-FT) 3276 TC(MINUTES) 2.1 ENTER [d:][pat;h]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ100D SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P.- PRINT, S - STOP 1, S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YF,.AR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2.0 -----------------------------------------------------------------=---- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.3306,85,0.0,98,10.24 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) ..06 7.83 953 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZ01OU SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0.0110,85,0.3196,98,2.08 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 85.0 .3 98.0 2'.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .19 7.67 2091 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: MKEZOlOD SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P.- PRINT, S - STOP SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE.OF FACILITY: *ANK 2) TANK DIAMETER(ft), STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 4.00, 4.00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: MKEZ100D 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .13 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: MKEZ0l0D TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .06 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: MKEZ100D TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .13 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 4.00, 6 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: YES ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER.ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 1263 CU-F�' BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) L� 0.081 DIA.= 1.22 INCHES n / TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.30 DIA.= 1.18 INCHES ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... TRIAL TANK -LENGTH STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 100.5 1263 .693 2.16 .06 2 77.9 978 618 2.42 .08 3 .63.5 798 565 2.67 .09 4 54.3 681 530 2.91 .10 5 48.2 606 504 3.11 .10 6 44.2 555 485 3.27 .11 7 41.4 520 472 3.42 .11 8 39.5 496 462 3.53 12 9 38.1 479 455 3.61 .12 10 37.2 467 449 3.71 .12 11 36.5 458 445 3.78 .12 12 35.9 451 441 3.83 .13 13 35.6 446 439 3.88 .13 14 35.3 443 437 3.91 .13 15 35.1 440 436 3.93 13 16 34.9 438 435 3.95 .13 17 34.8 437 434 3.96 .13 18 34.7 435 434 3.97 .13 19 34.6 434 433 3.98 .13 20 34.6 434 433 3.98 .13 21 34.5 433 432 3.99 .13 22 34.5 433 432 3.99 .13 23 34.5 433 432 3.99 .13 24 34.4 432 .432 3.99 .13 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGI DESIGN HYD: .29 .13 .13 3.99- 43: TEST HYD 1: .19 .06 .06 2.33 26( TEST HYD 2: .29 .13 .13 3.99 43( SPECIFY: D'- DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - ST( CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES 14010 DATE: Received of: am � � a �•o� Address: Phone A- . (v78 Project Location: j ,q N heck N jQ Cash Total Received IT k /-rr, Water Meter Size: Water Connection Fee Sewer Permit/Repair Trunk Charge Sewer Connection/LID Fee R/W Construction Permit Fee Street Cut/Restoration Fee (620 Fund) Street Disru tion Fee (111 Fund) Engineering 2.2% Inspection Fee Engineering Specs & Plans Fee Storm Drainage Fee Street Use Permit Building Permit Fee - Type Plan Check Fee State Surcharge (622 Fund) Zoning Application Fee - Type Shoreline Permit Fee SEPA Review Fee Recording Fee Maps/Books Photocopies Traffic Mitigation Fee Sidewalk Contribution Amount Received by: 'Z2— Permit No. A�,-;- �� PLANNING DATA New Commercial Proiects (d1oz.) SITE ADDRESS: l (O - 3 * +v(• IU, ( -13 ZONING: .136 USE(S) PROPOSED: tYfzt,,1 L 2_0". ALLOWED?: ycs LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED N (Y/N) CUP File: (V To Allow What Uses?: NA ADB FILE #: %- 113 PARKING: Use: re*L;) No. Spaces Required: I lac X 3(o5'%2- (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ . 085 Use: P.o-e•cs No. Spaces Required: 2 /c&4;i- X �,, (floor area, # employees, etc.) = j o sp.±LtJ Use: o 4ra - rb �--w rMp. Spy, No. Spaces Required: / X Ss 1 r ° (floor area, # employees, etc.) = 7 SS c Use: 44 rn v, s 4pg -- sov, No. Spaces Required: ► iV X 3&G7/s (floor area, # employees, etc.) = 2, 3 Total Required: 2-5 Actual Provided: -Z-3— 9/ t 3/99 _ P �r�ut Z ,r, - �,�.,,, sP auJ SETBACKS: ,Na Required Setback : Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: &4--e Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: 10G "" e Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR# LANDSCAPING: ^" c4-y Matches ADB approved: Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid): DATE: $/ 19 /99 (917-V"" ) PLAN CHK#: PG- 99- ?ez (P(-g9 .. 3 20) NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: �Ly L s Continued ... ( Skv_ - ova'r 1 Al i brary\^P 1 and atNewComm. doc �r C&(cacl Ma,., Sr, DWIN a,* c v%4rr-, A -flv+-Olei rt -N.a.nr 6LWnvr S4- 41 - 0nr's 5&e rw on - 8rk GvA o'-'.r 91?_01) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TZ 6= A&�-,twvgc ADB FILE #: 96 - rr3 OR DATE WAIVED: 9/1,129 �r PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: Yes SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: N4r 2! j'A, (iA _ ')6 - I6 9- U*W- SEPA DETERMINATION:�vr. SHORELINE REQUIRED?: A LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: Pia REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? M� Plan Review By: I:\I ibrary\^PlandatNewComm.doc ,(tic. 1 S9v CITY OF EDIvIONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering September 15, 1999 Jim Markezinis 18826 Fremont Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133 SUBJECT: Soundview Plaza Parking Configuration (ED44) Dear Mr. Markezinis, The Engineering Division has completed an evaluation of the subject parking area as installed. It has been determined that the building has been constructed with 23 full width dimension spaces per Parking Lot Construction section ECDC 18.95.020. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220. Thank you. Sincerely, MARYANNE ZUKOWSKI Traffic Engineer MZ/cmc c: Meg Gruwell, Planner Warren LaFon, Architect Ray Miller, Development Services Director BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Incorporated August 11, 1890 ° CAMy Documents\Engsec\DEVELOP\SoundviewPlam.doc Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 10, FOR �Czi _/!6 - 3 cp,1014F /Y. '2M0/VD s, &!Y r HVIRES 21101 BAKER ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL DESIGN 6628 - 212TH SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 PO BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046-1697 EDWIN F. BAKER, P.E. PHONE (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 R'EC�I9D rr.n MAR. 2 0 DEVELCIP�M OF EOMONOS CTR. COVER SHEET DATE: JOB NO: /&ry Gr�~ f3�F,us M -5y 4• /f3f5.5•2/14Gte ?, rf 94.7 SS, o k /9_ x'Z.. _ // 7 Fr-)c � f7 411 'X'X a �s - fit//4-X 6S (IS = 77 f) P1 15'�-za� ws '0"o ?/,er Rov "/?-6-� f,D x 27S /C /f.G f 3'r.G - K /410 ~- /Jlr9 /r/e r- ZXZ 45; - / /:� 1A1 I W /G K 4 7 7 /N BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. SUBJECT��Z//1�/S SHEET STRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB NO.Z/ AV' B%�$Y:J�- CHK'D: OF 6628 212TH S.W. LYNNWOOD, WA DA E:l P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 AEW c r z~ :ems 41'+r(p r44 2 1; Z no ,�zXz- 4. %z /N 13 W14ox So W 1040 �. r'v f W.� • ot 9,G k- A _ f1 �r-k a. Z2 X� / 11v rVi�xG� W/¢x 8z BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. SUBJECT-./Y*"—Zmfs SHEET STRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB NO -WOO, AAY:-AF225CHK'D: OF 6628 212TH S.W. LYNNWOOD, WA E: P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 4 p pp /:- //-'0* no; �-14x /I- 2. 7-15 4-X ¢X�Z 2 T�S 4(-X4irX� V, w r1mer, le BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. SUBJECT JY-i?AK47/N�S VSIEETSTRUCTURAL DESIGN 5628 212TH S.W. LYNNWOOD, WAJOB NO '00' �R BY: CHK'D: E, P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 74 /�2/01 7 77' e 7X / r /-X/� `Q / _ r 0 /� /6 l l�� '77, r BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. SUBJECT-'Z N/ EET STRUCTURAL DESIGN Y' JOB NO. 04'10d'4L0%Y: CHK'D: OF 6628 212TH S.W. LYNNWOOD, WA D P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 MEMORANDUM Date: March 15, 1999 To: Jim Walker Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud ,, / A Subject: Parking configuration at 110 — 3rd Ave N. (Sound View Plaza) The Engineering Division received the new parking configuration for the above referenced subject on March 15, 1999. The Engineering Division reviewed the new drawing and concluded that the parking dimension and isle width meet the city code. RECOMMENDATION: Prior to building approval, field inspection must be done. NOTE: I wonder if a year or six months from the building approval we can do parking inspection. My concern is once the building approval is granted; parking dimensions could be altered. If you have any question, please feel free to call. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division \\CrFY2\SYS\ENGRVAMAL\Gordy-DR\ola-6.DOC In-C),9 J CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant February 16, 1999 Mr. Ola Groset, General Contractor 931 Twelfth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Commercial Construction at 110 Third Avenue North (Permit Number 970575) (ADB-96-113� Dear Mr. Groset: As a result of the meeting you had with Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer, on February 9, 1999, you agreed to submit a drawing to the Engineering Division that would show the existing parking configuration and dimensions on the first and second floors of the subject building. Mr. Mahmoud will coordinate with the Planning Division to determine the number of parking stalls required for the building. Upon receipt of these two pieces of information, Jamal will make a decision as to whether the required parking stalls meet the City of Edmonds Community Development Code. Please don't hesitate to contact Jamal at (425) 771-0220 if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, GORDY HYDE Development Services Engineer GCH/cmc c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator Larry Naughten (425) 774-9285 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • f11c.1g9,3 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARAFAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant , February 26, 1999 Mr. Ola Groset, General Contractor 931 Twelfth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Commercial Construction at 110 Third Avenue North (Permit Number 970575) (ADB-113) Dear L&r ('rasgt - The Traffic Engineer, Jamal Mahmoud, reviewed the drawing that you submitted to show the existing parking configuration and dimensions on the first and second floor of the subject building. Mr. Mahmoud coordinated with the Planning Division to determine the number of parking stalls required for the building. Jamal's determination is summarized in the attached memorandum. As a result of his investigation, he is also requesting that you submit a parking plan that shows how you propose to stripe the parking areas so that the code -required parking regulation can be met, both in number and in dimensions. Jamal indicates that the aisle width through the parking area does not meet the required 24'-0" width. Please contact him directly to resolve this issue. Jamal can be contacted at 771-0220, Ext. 328, if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, [G{ ORDY E evelopment Services Engineer GCH/cmc Enclosure c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator 11CITY21SYS1ENGRIGORDY1611 ]pkg.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan I,, MEMORANDUM Date: February 19, 1999 To: Jim Walker Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud Subject: Parking configuration at 110 — 3`d Ave N. (Sound View Plaza) The Engineering Division received as built drawing regarding parking configuration for the above subject on February 16, 1999. The Engineering Division reviewed the as built drawing and found the following: 1. First Floor: Number of parking stalls meet the code (8'-6" X 16'-6") g Number of parking stalls does not meet the code 11. Possible number of parking stalls that could meet the code 13 1. Second Floor: Number of parking stalls meet the code (8'-6" X 16'-6") 7 Number of parking stalls do not meet the code 8 Possible number of parking stalls that could meet the code 11 3. Summary: Total number of parking stalls meet the code (8'-6" X 16'-6") 15 Total number of parking stalls do not meet the code 19 Total possible number of parking stalls that could meet the code 24 In addition, the isle width as seen in the as built drawing is 23'-8"; this does not meet the City of Edmonds code. The code require minimum isle width to be 24 ft. Based on the submitted as built parking plan, you do not meet the City parking code. The developer is REQUIRED to submit a parking plan which shows total number of Parking stalls required at full dimension, 8 1/2 X 16 '/z. If you have any question, please feel free to call. City of Edmonds Community Services Department F-TNGRVAMAL%Cordy-DRbla-3.DOC Engineering Division PLANNING DATA NAME: 50W1k , AW Nog-', SITE ADDRESS: / /o - 3 r°`ht_ N. ' DATE: / / / e% 9.9 ZONING: . gL PLAN CHK#: 99 4- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: USE(S) PROPOSED: Ofi 'Qs ALLOWED?: 'Yc LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED n; -(YIN) CUP File: +vie+ ADB FILE #: Ty 2Z+ - OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APP OVED PLAN: MIA PARKING: OA svv- Use: No. Spaces Required: s rtA(Jt X �s�—�-- (floor area, # employees, etc.)= � 4-"� a wd - or Use: o No. Spaces Required: as f X i-7 RR ° •+'1' 835 " ;Z42'(floor area, # employees, etc.) = .Z$ -> 3 SpAu J W)9 Total Required: 3 '5 ��s Actual Provided: 19 — 14 = Spans (VI � q P I , X Asa la" b tiLiwale eY+ G` � A/�It_� J"v. J g Wom/v 1 l3�vtt (6�h 6 wry . � ��ar /•�x1 �lflGtk� SETBACKS: tea L S �byv s Required Setb cks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: L Z Actual Setbacks:, Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: N6 Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: P Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: LANDSCAPING: AJ'a c.+,.y Matches ADB approved: Bond: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS M `� 4r\f11et\pa mAt^PLANDAcZ0C C oVLr SEPA DETERMINATION: NO- hfA WWA SHORELINE REQUIRED?: LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: OTHER: N►✓ 9(a a/�lyc1 Plan Review By: C of 2 spa-ccr /cam = sP" (er Of u 5pt u, Tr see r,,kroltr� V f 1 �i�G�Li�J � �Q ih ��r pG✓w'H[{ G�� e\ttl es\parmilt^PL1NDAc, DOC Mahmoud, Jamal From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:22 PM To: Mahmoud, Jamal Subject: RE: Sound view Plaza @110 - 3rd Ave. N. The building you refer to, Soundview Plaza at 110 - 3rd Avenue N. has the following area/units and parking requirements: 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces/ unit = 10 spaces 2nd Floor Office space 2888+1788+835= 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space/800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces 1st Floor Retail space 3015 sq. ft. @ 1 space/300 sq.ft. = 10 spaces TOTAL = 27 spaces If the first floor calculations does not include the common area, then the calculations will be slightly off (i.e.: If the first floor is really 3400 sq. ft. when the common areas are included, then the parking requirements would be 11 spaces, for a grand total of 28 spaces.) If the applicant now no longer plans to have retail in the first floor, but instead proposes to have office space, then the total will be one of the following: With on -site customer service: 3015 sq.ft. @ 1/400 sq. ft. = 8 spaces (9 spaces if 3400 sq. ft.) Grand total for building = 10+7+8 = 25 spaces With NO on -site customer service: 3015 sq. ft. @ 1/800 sq. ft. = 4 spaces (also 4 spaces if 3400 sq.ft.) Grand Total for building = 10+7+4 = 21 spaces I hope that answers your question. If you need any further information, please let me know. —Original Message -- From: Mahmoud, Jamal �e Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:02 PM To: Gruwell, Meg Cc: Walker, Jim; Hyde, Gordy Subject: Sound view Plaza @110 - 3rd Ave. N. Friendly reminder: \ I would like to know TOTAL number of parking stalls required for the above development. As you know, Mr. Ola Groset claims that the total number of parking stalls required is 20. And he is providing 33 parking stall. This means 13 parking stalls are extra. Thanks. � Y MEMORANDUM Date: February 9, 1999 To: Jim Walker Planning Roy Whitcutt Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud Subject: Parking configuration at 110 — 3rd Ave N. (Sound View Plaza) I met with Ola today at 10:00 AM February 9, 1999 and agreed to do the following: 1 Find number of parking stalls REQUIRED for the development. Coordinate with planning department 2 Ola needs to submit drawing to the engineering department showing existing parking configuration on first and second floor 3 Once the engineering department receives the drawing, a decision will be made whether the required parking stalls meet the City of Edmonds code or not. Conclusion: The engineering department waiting to receive the following: 1 Number of parking stalls REQUIRED. Planning. 2 Existing parking configuration. Ola. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division • Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM Feb. 4, 1999 Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Jim walker, City Engineer Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer Subject: Revised Parking plan for Soundview Plaza at 110 — 3`d Ave. N (ADB 96- 113) (Plan Check 97-575) Based on my site visit on February 4, 1999 to the above site, I have the following questions and concerns: 1. What is the use of the building? Please specify if the first and the floor going to be an office, retail, or.... This is important to the planning and engineering departments to figure out number of parking stalls required. Please see the attached a-mial by planning. 2. Submit parking plan for the first and the second floor. Based on the site visit, I measured the parking stalls and the isle widths on the first and second floor, I found parking dimensions do NOT meet the City of Edmonds code. In addition, the submitted plan on January 28, 1999 does NOT meet the City of Edmonds code; therefore the plan can not be approved as is. Thanks City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division LJ MEMORANDUM Date: February 10, 1999 To: Jim Walker Jeff Wilson Meg Gruwell Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud Subject: Parking configuration at 110 - 3rd Ave N. (Sound View Plaza) I received an E-mail from Meg and a hand written note from Jeff, see the attached copies, showing different number of parking stalls required for the above project. We need Ola to specify, in writing, the use of the building so number of parking stalls could be determined by planning. The engineering department informed Ola to provide the following: 1 Use of'building on first and second floor 2 To provide parking configuration In addition, please read my memo dated February 9, 1999, attached. City of Edmonds mom IV Community Services Department Engineering Division F:\ENGR\JAMAL\Gordy-DR\ola-2.DOC • is February 16, 1999 Gordy Hyde Development Services Eng. City of Edmonds Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Dear Gordy, RF.CE1VED FEB 16 1999 ENGINEERING Here is the information you requested at our meeting this morning. 1. What is the square footage and use of each floor of the Bay View Plaza. a. First Floor .... 3000 SF and the use will be mixed, either office, or retail. In order to comply we should figure retail. One parking space per 400 Sf= 8 spaces b. Second Floor ... 4,800 SF and the use is office. One parking space per 1000 SF = 5 spaces c. Third Floor... Five condominiums = 10 spaces The above represents a need for 23 spaces... It appears that there are enough parking spaces to meet the above requirements. The question is are the present spaces the proper dimensions to meet the city's parking stall codes. 2. Existing parking dimensions. Mr. Markizinis will provide you this information from the plans that he has. Regards, Larry gfiten ing agent c of EDM0 MEMORANDUM -est. I SVI Date: February 18, 1999 TO: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer CC: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor Jim Walker, City Engineer Jeannine Graf, Building Official Ola Grosset, Builder Larry Naughten, Listing Agent From: Meg Gruwell, Planner REC�1vED v Eg % 1g99 ENG1NEEVt1t4G Subject: Parking at Soundview Plaza,110 — 3rd Avenue N. There have been a number of different memorandums and letters circulating with differing parking requirements and.different floor space figures for the Soundview Plaza, located at 110 — 3rd Avenue N., which is being constructed under building permit #980471. The following is our best estimate to date, given all of the information submitted. All parking for retail or office uses are based on gross floor area, not just the office area. For the first floor I have relied on Ola Grosset's calculations that the leasable areas are 1550 and 1501 square feet and the common area is approximately 600 square feet (Ola scaled this off the floor plan) for a total of 3651. The second story calculations are from the leasable area shown on the plans as 2888 and 1788 square feet, and Warren Lafon's calculations that the common area on that floor is 835 square feet: This results in a total second floor area of 5511 square feet. It has been pointed out that this does not match the area shown on the plans submitted, which as revised on 7/22 were 4410. square feet of retail, and 5610 square feet of office space, but we are relying on the applicant and builder to have provided us with updated and accurate information. The following are the required parking for various proposed uses. The required spaces for retail is one space per 300 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.1). The 'required spaces for offices providing on -site customer service is one space per 400 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.5). The required spaces for offices with NO on -site customer service is one space per 800 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.6). We have been given conflicting information about what the use of the first floor will be. Ola Grosset has said that it will only be office use with no on -site customer service. Larry Naughten in a letter dated February 16, 1998, states that the use will be mixed, either office or retail. In order to allow future use of the first floor as retail, parking requirements would be as follows: TO PRESERVE ABILITY TO HAVE RETAIL ON FIRST FLOOR 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit 1 = 10 spaces 2nd Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces 1st floor Retail. use: 3651 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 300 sq. ft. = 12 spaces TOTAL 29 spaces If, as Ola Grosset states, only offices with no on -site customer service is to be provided, then the following are required: ALLOWING ONLY OFFICE USES WITH NO ON -SITE CUSTOMER SERVICE 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit = 10 spaces 2°d Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces lst floor office use: 3651 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 5 spaces TOTAL 22 spaces If only 22 spaces are provided which meet the City Code requirements, we will place a fluorescent memo in the file that only office uses with no on -site customer service will, be allowed on both the first and second floors. We would also like to see the owner providing that information to all proposed tenants. Not providing adequate full-sized parking spaces will have a definite impact on uses allowed in the future. The applicant and owner should consider this very carefully before finalizing their parking plan. It would probably be useful to have an as -built of the parking to insure that how many spaces meet code requirements. If you have any further questions, please contact me Monday, Tuesday (aft6moon), or Thursday at extension 330. Thank you. Page 2 of 2 MEMOENGR.DOC 02/ l a/99. ST3d��' FLE MEMORANDUM Date: February 18, 1999 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer CC: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor Jim Walker, City Engineer Jeannine Graf, Building Official Ola Grosset, Builder Larry Naughten, Listing Agent From: Meg Gruwell, Planner Subject: Parking at Soundview Plaza, 110 — 3rd Avenue N. There have been a number of different memorandums and letters circulating with differing parking requirements and different floor space figures for the Soundview Plaza, located at 110 — 3rd Avenue N., which is being constructed under building permit #980471. The following is our best estimate to date, given all of the information submitted. All parking for retail or office uses are based on gross floor area, not just the office area. For the first floor I have relied on Ola Grosset's calculations that the leasable areas are 1550 and 1501square feet and the common area is approximately 600 square feet (Ola scaled this off the floor plan) for a total of 3651. The second story calculations are from the leasable area shown on the plans as 2888 and 1788 square feet, and Warren Lafon's calculations that the common area on that floor is 835 square feet. This results in a total second floor area of 5511 square feet. It has been pointed out that this does not match the area shown on the plans submitted, which as revised on 7/22 were 4410 square feet of retail, and 5610 square feet of office space, but we are relying on the applicant and builder to have provided us with updated and accurate information. The following are the required parking for various proposed uses. The required spaces for retail is one space per 300 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.1). The required spaces for offices providing on -site customer service is one space per 400 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.5). The required spaces for offices with NO on -site customer service is one space per 800 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.6). We have been given conflicting information about what the use of the first floor will be. Ola Grosset has said that it will only be office use with no on -site customer service. Larry Naughten in a letter dated February 16, 1998, states that the use will be mixed, either office or retail. In order to allow future use of the first floor as retail, parking requirements would be as follows: TO PRESERVE ABILITY TO HAVE RETAIL ON FIRST FLOOR 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit = 10 spaces 2"d Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces 1" floor Retail use: 3651 sq. ft.. @ 1 space / 300 sq. ft. = 12 spaces TOTAL 29 spaces If, as Ola Grosset states, only offices with no on -site customer service is to be provided, then the following are required: ALLOWING ONLY OFFICE USES WITH NO ON -SITE CUSTOMER SERVICE 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit = 10 spaces 2°d Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces 1" floor office use: 3651 sq. ft. @ I space / 800 sq. ft. = 5 spaces TOTAL 22 spaces If only 22 spaces are provided which meet the City Code requirements, we will place a fluorescent memo in the file that only office uses with no on -site customer service will be allowed on both the first and second floors. We would also like to see the owner providing that information to all proposed tenants. Not providing adequate full-sized parking spaces will have a definite impact on uses allowed in the future. The applicant and owner should consider this very carefully before finalizing their parking plan. It would probably be useful to have an as -built of the parking to insure that how many spaces meet code requirements. If you have any further questions, please contact me Monday, Tuesday (afternoon), or Thursday at extension 330. Thank you. Page 2 of 2 MEMOENGR.DOC 02/18/99. • • MEMORANDUM Date: January 29, 1999 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer !�— From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer # Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 3rd Ave. N.(ADB-96-113) (Building permit #970575) Today, the Engineering Division received the attached additional building permit information that shows the revised parking lot layout. Please review this set of plans as soon as possible and return to me with your comments. If you need more information, please check the ED file and earlier correspondence with the applicant. Please be aware that it appears that the parking stalls proposed do not meet the size required by the ECDC, but are similar to ones that you approved with the building permit. This issue needs to be resolved. Please return your review comments and requirements to me as soon as possible, so I may prepare a letter to the applicant or work to obtain construction approval from Jim Walker. Your cooperation in initiating a prompt review is appreciated. Thank you. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION grosetldoc Date: To From: Subject: MEMORANDUM January 4, 1999 Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer of 60' Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 3rd Ave. N.(ADB-97-113) (Building permit #970575) On December 28, 1998, the Engineering Division received the attached additional building permit information that you requested. Please review this set of plans as soon as possible and return to me with your comments so I can get authorization to construct from Jim Walker. If you need more information, please check the ADB file and earlier correspondence with the applicant. Please return your review comments and requirements to me as soon as possible, so I may prepare a letter to the applicant or work to obtain construction approval from Jim Walker. Your cooperation in initiating a prompt review is appreciated. Thank you. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION grosctldoc • Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM January 7, 1999 Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer J h Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 — 3`a Ave. N. (ADB 97-113) (Plan Check 97 —575) No comments. Thank you. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division Date: January 4, 1999 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer 6y 60- Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at-110 3' Ave. N.(ADB-97-113) (Building permit #970575) On December 28, 1998; the Engineering Division received the attached additional building permit'information that you requested. Please review this set of plans as -soon as possible and return to me with your comments so I can get authorization to construct from Jim Walker. If you need more information, please check the APB file and earlier correspondence with the applicant. Please return your review comments and requirements to me as soon as possible, so I may prepare a- letter to the applicant or work to obtain construction approval from Jim Walker: Your cooperation in initiating a prompt review is appreciated. Thank you. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION grosaldoc fhc.18913 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant January 11, 1999 Mr. Ola Groset, General Contractor 325 Third Avenue South, #303 Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Commercial Construction at 110 Third Avenue North (Permit No 970575) Dear Mr. Groset: The Engineering Division reviewed your proposed revisions to the alley entry to the parking at the subject site. The design as prepared by CG Engineering appears to work, and I intend to approve it for construction. With the same submittal, we received a drawing prepared by Warren LaFon that shows the second floor plan with parking layout. It is marked up in two colors, though no initials or revision notes are included. Please submit a plan that shows the anticipated dimensions of all the parking stalls on the second floor. Please be aware that the standard dimension for parking stalls per the Edmonds Community Development Code is eight and one- half feet wide by sixteen and one-half feet long. Thank you for providing this information. Please contact Gordy Hyde at (425) 771-0220, Ext. 325, if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer JCW/GCH/cmc c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator Incorporated August 11, 1890 • gec-09-98 _03. 11P_ Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.02 -- - -- uLe P©i 1812070522 9wsB RE00RDRD RETMW To's 12/07/98 13:51 P.0008 Recorded Snohomish County %eft OMCM of Joba E. Da hi TLLC��Cl�� $715 23rd Ave. MV %a( Beattie, VA 94117 IRROUIRED oR �' �(LYINOEC 0 719% OINAL ON FHE �:� rsr;-:,;; srl)-IMshCounty lnssunr COUNTY �1tJCR0A'8 OFFICE 0.y 0 A N 71 N I ;RAW OF Imm" GRANTORS., XARKEZINI5, James MARKEZINIS, Carrie CRMTEE. Fleury Family LLC LEGAL: S 1/2 Lot 8, and all Lots 9, Washington. 10 and 11, Blk 6, Plat of Edmonds, Val. 1, pa ga 26, Snohomish CO.' 4344�-006=008-0006 and 4344-006-010-0002 lPBERBU JMEB 1s111tMINIS and CARRXN XARKESINIS, husband and Wile, are the owners of the following described property: Parcel A. Lots 10 and 11, Block 6, plat of Edmonds, according to the plat thereof recorded in Voluma 1 of Plats, Page 26, records of Snohomish County, Washington. AND WER"AS, Fleury Family LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, is the owner of the following described property: Parcel B. The South half of Lot 8, and all of Lot 9, Block 6, Plat of Edmonds, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume. 2 of Plats, Page 26, records of Snohomish county, Washington. 92 kMdQ1C01"VMXEZTX\EA3fM(11T.A -1- iDec-07-98 10:17A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.02 • i AND WHEREAS, for and in consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned owners of Parcel A hereby convey and grant to the owner of Parcel B, an easement for ingress and egress with provisions for construction and maintenance thereto; and an easement for drainage with provisions for maintenance over, under, and across Parcel A more particularly described as follows: A. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT. CON07RUC71ON AND XAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1. A. non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across Parcel A as follows: The North Twenty-five (25) feet of the West Fifty-four (54) feet of Lot 10. NOW,, THEREFORE, the above described owners, for mutual benefits derived, do hereby agree and covenant to the following Construction and Maintenance Agreement: 1. Cost of Construction. It is agreed, the cost and expense for construction of any work to access Parcel B through a new opening in the existing concrete wall in the Northeast Twenty-four (24) feet of the easement area shall be borne solely by the owner of Parcel B. Said work shall conform to standard engineering practices as set7'forth in the Baker Engineers Standard Design Site Plan. A copy of said Site Plan is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein as more fully set forth. 2. Maintenance. It is agreed, the owners of Parcels A and B, their successors and assigns, shall share the cost of maintenance of such right-of-way as follows: Each shall pay one-half (1/2) of normal maintenance of the right-of- way required by ordinary wear -and -tear, including, by way of example, sweeping, cleaning, restriping, repairing or replacing signs and mirrors, and repairing concrete. The owner of Parcel B shall pay for all repairs exclusively C : \WP50\CM00\MARKE21 MUEMEMT .A -2 Z/� Dec-07-98 10:18A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.03 related to use by, or caused by, the owner of Parcel B or their agent, or a tenant, or an invitee or licensee of a tenant, of Parcel B. The owner of Parcel A shall pay for all repairs exclusively related to use by, or caused by, the owner of Parcel A or their agent, or a tenant, or an invitee or licensee of a tenant, of Parcel A. The owner of Parcel B shall have no responsibility for repairs related to use by, -or caused by the owner of Parcel A or their agent, or an owner, tenant or an invitee or, licensee of a tenant, of Parcel A. It is agreed that the easement area shall be maintained and kept in a condition that permits adequate automobile travel by those who have legal access thereto and therefore. B. DRAINAGE EASEXENT AND l4AINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1. A drainage easement over, under and across Parcel A as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 10; thence South on the East two (2) feet of Lots 10 and 11, a distance of approximately one hundred twenty (120) feet; thence West, on the South two (2) feet of Lot 11, a distance of approximately sixty (60) feet, to a water retention system. NOW, THEREFORE, the above described owners, for mutual benefits derived, do hereby agree and covenant to the following Maintenance Agreement: 1. pram Pipe. It is agreed that all maintenance, repair, improvement and/or rebuilding of said shared drain pipe, located within the drainage easement, shall be the obligation and responsibility of the, owners of Parcel B and their successors and/or assigns. It is agreed that the easement shall be maintained and kept in a condition that permits adequate drainage. 2. Water Retention system. It is agreed that maintenance and repair of the water retention system shall be shared equally between the owners of Parcel A and B. The owner of Parcel B shall C:\Wi0\CONDO\MARKEZIN\EASEMENT.A -3- 5/q v Dec-07-98 10:18A Scott Fleury 425-670-0 0807 i P.04 have no responsibility for repairs to and mamintenance of other parts of any drainage system on Parcel . A, and shall be responsible only as specifically proviaded in this Easement Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT is binding upon the present owiwners, their successors and assigns and is intended to run perpet:=ual with the land. AGREEMENT made this 4th day of December, 1998. GRANTORS: A co U�Kmes Markezini Carrie Markezinis GRANTEE: FLEURY FAMILY LLC By: Scott Fle y Its: Manager STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) This is to certify that on this 4th day of Dec,cember, 1998, there appeared personally before me James Karkazinie.s and Carrie Markezinis, to me known to be or proven with satisfactdtory evidence the individuals who executed the foregoing GRANT of : EASEMENT AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, and they did acknowledge and declazire to me that they executed the same freely and voluntarily for tithe uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt s t ,h nd d of i ial seal this 4th day of December, 1998. �' Joh Da NOTARY PUBLIQ in and for the state of Washingt000n. My Commission expiiires: 2/25/99 C:\WP50\CONDO\MARKEZIN\EASEMENT.A - a µ/g Dec-07-98 10:19A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.05 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING } This is to certify that on this 4th day of December, 1998, personally before me Scott Fleury, to me known to be the Manager of FLEURY FAMILY LLC, the Washington Limited Liability Company that executed the foregoing GRANT OF EASEMENT AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary .act and deed of said limited liability company for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto t �,h/ d ia� �f i r al seal this 4th dayof December, 1998. Johg7T. Dahl + NOTARY PUBLIC\ .in and for the State of Washington. My Commission expires: 2/25/99 C:\VP50\CONDO\MARKE21N\EASEMENT.A _5 S/6 Dec-07-98 10:20A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.06 Exhibit A 8' S7 " e 120.0 0' I A_L p '7'.1 � N _. Lois Io �*h!v 1 l , LoG� FLAT ,-7F .�_ AS��f� HLNG'T BAKER ENGINEERS SUBJECT WALL SHEET STRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB. NO. '�S- 275 BY: r-M CHK'D: M L 6628 212TH. S.W. LYNNWOOD WA DATE: P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD WA 98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 1C-2g I Dec-07-98 10:20A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 i P.07 lEXIS .. Cc Nr, WALL '.Tv ��7q',l:f�✓1vv'Ep � �C.1S-r. GcNG. NALL, � PeT, x ul P,rA.i IA L 2 ND F ,LoO`I � u N1=1M ormN r NG, im, ex 1s7li-4G GaN G l:m'is WALL NeW i��V. �i G x�x�if xo'..9" 1 / �I BAKER ENGINEERS SUBJECT: MARK0ZINIS WALL I >HEESTRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB. NO. g8.2T5 BY: I `1 CHK'D: "t�- ? 6628 212TH. S.W. LYNNWOOD WA DATE: P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD WA 9B046.1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX (425) 771-6558 157. nec-07-98 10:21A Scott Fleury 425-670-0807 P.08 l .5 co _._ - �- :2 x A I L S - TG H -ATA -To tit W . . "rHKV'D. WF-LP ht IrVv 'LIM O N IL -off J' BAKER ENGINEERS SUBJECT NIS VVALL. SHEET STRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB. NO.95•BY: : 1 CHK'D:M L 3pF 6528 212TH. S.W. LYNNWOOD WA DATE: P.O. BOX'1697 LYNNWOOD WA 98046-1697 (425) 771-6666 FAX'(425) 771.6558 • • Date:. To: MEMORANDUM December 16, 1998' Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer From: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer p Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 - 3`d Ave. N. (ADB 97-113) (Plan Check 97 -575) In order to complete the review of your revised building permit application, the following traffic issues should be addressed: 1 Please submit the new parking lot configuration due to the relocation of the driveway along the alley between 3rd Avenue N. and 4' Avenue N. 2 The proposed speed hump is NOT allowed. Please see drawing SK-2. 3 Please provide a detailed section along the south side of the proposed driveway, see SK-1 comment. Thank you. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division f4c.189, November 4, 1998 • • jobs CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 7710221 .COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works *Planning /Building - Parks and Recreation - Engineering - Wastewater Treatment Plant Mr. Ola Groset, General Contractor 931— 12`h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Commercial construction at 110 — P Ave. N. (permit number 970575) (ADB-113) . Dear Mr. Groset: The Engineering Division reviewed the access design proposal submitted by Vern Bower on October 26. The maximum slope that will be allowed in the alley will be 6%. This maximum relates to both the east west and the north -south direction. On your private property, the driveway access slope will be the standard roadway slope allowed by the code, 12%. This probably only affects two feet of your property at the southerly end of your access. It will be necessary for your engineer to revise his proposal to meet these criteria. As indicated in earlier correspondence, further engineering inspection of your site cannot take place without City approval of this access. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, GordyId e Development Services Engineer Cc: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator Intensus Engineering' • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan I F hay 6ui/ding En&awce /o *r &V41 r _ /0, Z " :i:•::::::: iZW X lb I-- 7r `/ate Ex43t1h 6uirda9 , Par k Sr:cl • 3 Al - ----- /z IN -17 L Bo � Go 6 ALLEY BETWEEN 3RD & 4TH: NORTH OF MAIN STREET. for 325 - 3rd Ave A Elmo A 98020 r MWA Engines W & Swerngj PO Box 9W,, Sys hww4 WA 9Mg (425) 48IL7282 s (360) 688-7534 the 18oQQ CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARAFAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98026 e (425) 771-20 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR 02 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant December.40, 1998 Mr. Ola Groset Groset Construction 931 12th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington. 98020 RE: Soundview Plaza @ 110 3rd Avenue North, Permit #970575/#980471 RECEIVED DEC 10 1998 . N(11NEERING The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the City has extended the deadline for the submittal of professional engineered alley plans for the subject project until December 23, 199&. As indicated in the City Engineer's letter dated 11/30/98 it is our understanding that the plans prepared by Vern Bower, P.E., dated 11/9/98,'will need to be altered due to your difficulty in obtaining an agreement from the.neighboring property owner. Thus, revised alley plans are required. Please be advised, the City shall not grant further administrative extensions without written. requests submitted by either you or the property owner. Thank you,' Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Jim Markezinis Paul Mar, Community Services Director ✓Rm Walker; City Engineer Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator ® Incorporated August 11, 1890 o Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITYCOPY PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Jamal Mahmoud Engineering I e�tE ET Y,-- bLl Owner: ►M Q ✓iC2 Z ti Z Plan Check No: 9 7- I l Address• - Date:_ n - cn After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: I. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS - 7:00 A.M. ]0:00 P.M.;WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS - 10:00 A.M: 6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERT-AIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30.030d). 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap r: may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the perm (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver grantec -,-7.41— %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.3 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter (ECDC 7.20). 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID#Frim Fees paid: Yes No Charge SS (ECDC 18.10) 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assesse• value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANC OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) PRMTAPP.DOC *0 •• SOUNDVIEW PLAZA ... Site Improvements Cost Estimate units unit cost cost parking space paint markings ........ @...................................... $ ............................. $ yellowcurb painting ....................... ft ...................................... $ ............................. $ GRADING LOTS grading....................................... 5,000 c y.................................. $9/cy.................................. $45,000 STORM DRAINAGE 48" detention piping .......................... 28 ft ................................ $90/lin ft .................................... $2,520 CBMH, Type II, 48............................ 1 @.................................. $1,400 @ .................................. $1,400 8" control structure ............................1 @.................................... $390 @..................................... $390 catch basin - Type I - L ...................... 1 @ .................................... $750 @ .................................... $750 catch basin - Type I ........................... 1 @.................................... $350 @ .................................... $350 8" CMP.........................................:..... 20 ft .................................... $50/ft.................................... $1,000 8" PVC ............................................... 82 ft ..................................... $15/ft ................................... $1,230 $7, 6,gO SEWER 6" cleanouts..................................... 1 @.......................................... $300 @................................ $300 6" D. I .................................................. 70 ft ......................................... $30/ft ............................... $2,100 sewerhookup fees ............................. 1 @......................................... $ ............................... $ 40 i N 910 WATER 1 service meter ................. water hookup fees ............ EROSION CONTROL silt fence ............................ rock construction entrance 120 ft .. 1 @ $3/lin ft $300 @ Si3C%-✓C r_ (IV I^°id• 1 120, Y- 91 X' 12'0 � ► 3 o-0 a " Yk, q� ( W,/ , 1 ll ►2V� Y- 12 , 1 /,V o th $360 $300 14 6 9, 46 e L4.4 �,Vd � 0 000 - ky4,(- -5 � / 0 9 Z-f So ✓-/ P�A ,E1 .6�,g A-770 I✓ ��2��1 ��t�-?7or✓ /G��n/� G"Zo �f�Os',Co�oo a A)D 0 2' �2m z�Sv CITY OF EDMONDS — BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 ` I COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Inc. 189� July 1, 1998 Ola Groset Construction 931 Twelfth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Groset: Yesterday I witnessed your personal vehicle parked in the loading zone along Third Avenue fronting Claire's Pantry at 7:50 am and again at 1:50 pm. As stated in my letter dated June 261h, this is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. I have spoken to the Building Official and the Acting City Engineer as I consider this matter to be of extreme importance. I have obtained a Stop Work Order from the Building Official and, under section 202d of the Uniform Building Code, am prepared to use it upon the next loading zone violation by any construction -related vehicles. The City has received complaints regarding the occupancy of the loading zone, and I am prepared to act on this issue. I have provided both verbal and written requests that you work with the City in honoring our regulations and requirements. Sincerely, ROY S. WHITCUTT CIP Specialist RS W/cmc C: Don Fiene, Acting City Engineer Al Compaan, Asst. Police Chief Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer ✓ • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • MTY2\SYS\ENGR\ROYUNSPEC\SINGLE\PROCEDUR\G ENERAL\GROSET2. DOCGROSET2. DOC 'Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Inc.189"1 CITY OF MO• `DS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant October 19, 1998 CHRON COPY e, 4 Mailed Mr. Ola Groset, Eginm Faxed General Contractor 931— 12'b Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Commercial Construction at 110 Third Avenue North (Permit No. 970575) CIIR, Dear IN 6. et: This is a follow-up to a meeting Jim Walker and I had with you on your constriction site located at 110 Third Avenue North. The meeting was to address development concerns, including access from the upper level parking area into the alley, which was not shown on the original civil plans. As discussed, the City requires that you submit a drawing showing your proposal for gaining access to second floor parking from the alley. The drawing must include existing and proposed spot elevations, slope of the proposed access ramp at centerline and each edge, and existing and proposed profiles of the alley centerline across the entire frontage of the subject property. Additional information, such as drainage impact to neighboring property, may also be necessary. The drawing must be prepared by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the state of Washington. It is important that we receive this information for review as soon as possible. Final engineering inspection of your site cannot take place without City approval of this access. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, ORDY HYDE Development Services Engineer GCH/cmc c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator %XCrrY2%S SUMG eXG0"ncxos>:nnnoc • Incorporated August I1, 1890 • INTENSLYS ENGINEERING - SURVEYING P.O. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291 (206) 481-7282 - (206) 668-7534 It PROJECT GA0d'S9W —rdLA!Z PAGE 11 a PROJECT No. Z3 27TAN DATE BY �i Exisfii�y w�/din9 efil oIce /o ,Oarkih9 zee/ h�a a:::: q ::•::::::::;,is gn 97 : Gb�r 7 , Exr.�tia9 6uildi�9 #7 % o P 86 AS 99— _ 3 _NONE W� i M�� a wmwm� - 0 ,` IpIZh h 1��35 Ipl� � i - ` — ' --- -- — - --. /z 1,41 5 � `rv�;------`ice-------• /4/ ✓7 L Bp 1 EXeIRES 11- OLP "i:� ! for at cmhcbm ' ALLEY BETWEEN 3RD & 4TR NORTH OF MAIN STREET. 325 - 3rd Are A Ecinonds 98020 ` /V UM S, Engi►*&M & Surveys PO Box W6, Sno/iWWA WA 98M (425) 481-720 * (3W) 666-75N \ fhc.1SO) • CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant November 9, 1998 RECEIVED N 0 V 9 - 1998 E�NG1NEEIRI.Na Mr. Ola Groset 931 12t' Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Soundview Plaza @ 110 3`a Avenue North, Permit #980471 In response to your verbal request to obtain a partial temporary occupancy at the subject building (prior to the upper floor parking and alley issue being resolved, inspected and approved) the City is agreeable to the following: Provided that no life -safety violations exist, temporary occupancy could be granted for those portions of the building that meet the parking space requirements provided by the lower level parking garage. In other words, since 19 parking spaces are provided on this floor, temporary occupancy could be granted for portions of the building that require up to 19 parking spaces. In order to be clear on which portions of the building will be granted a temporary occupancy you must provide a square footage breakdown of those units or spaces that desire occupancy. The City will review this material and verify that the required parking spaces are provided by the lower level parking. Note, once all 19 spaces are allocated no additional temporary occupancies shall be granted until the upper floor parking is approved. , In order to further assure that the alley work will be completed in a timely manner, the City shall retain the full amount of the site performance engineering bond in the amount of $55,000 until final occupancy for the entire building is granted. Also, in order to be assured that you are moving toward resolving'the upper level parking issue you must submit an engineered stamped plan by December 9, 1998. Once these plans are approved, the City shall require a written statement of compliance that includes a sunset date for completion of this work. Note, temporary occupancy can be revoked by the Building Official for failure to meet any compliance deadline either noted in this letter or future deadlines established for completion of the alley and upper floor parking garage work. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Groset Page Two November 9, 1998 If you agree to these conditions please submit a copy of the approved floor plan(s) showing all spaces that will request temporary occupancy. Note, the proposed use of space, i.e., office, retail, condominium .etc. is essential and to repeat no life -safety violation can exist on any floor in order for temporary occupancy to be granted. Once the Planning Division has approved the number of parking spaces you may call for a final inspection with the Public Works Department, Planning Division, Fire Marshal and lastly Building Inspector. If life -safety violations are discovered during inspection temporary occupancy shall not be granted. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 425-771-0220. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Paul Mar, Community Services Director Walker; City Engineer Rob Chave, Planning Manager Jim Markezinis, Owner @ 18826 Fremont Avenue, Shoreline John Westfall, Fire Marshal Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 1998 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 3`d Ave. N.(ADB-97-113) (Building permit#970575) The Engineering Division received the attached building permit revision on November 9. Jim Walker had you work with the engineer and developer on this earlier. The developer/builder is extremely anxious to get this issue resolved. Please review this set of plans as soon as possible and return to me with your comments so I can get authorization to construct from Jim Walker. If you need more information, please check with me, as I have the ADB file and earlier correspondence with the applicant. Please return your review comments and requirements to me as soon as possible, so I may prepare a letter to the applicant. Your cooperation in initiating a prompt review is appreciated. Thank you. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION groset.doc the 189 v r � t`J CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 •'(425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant November 23, 1998 Mr. Ola Groset 931— 12`h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Soundview Plaza @ 110 — 3rd Avenue N., Permit #980471 Dear Mr. Groset: It has been brought to our attention that changes have been made to the Soundview Plaza building referenced above. We find no notes in the file approving these changes. Warren LaFon has provided drawings which he states he talked with John Bissell and Steve Bullock about and received a waiver shortly before John Bissell left the City. As stated above, we find no revised plans in the Building Permit application file, nor the - Architectural Design Board file, nor any notes on the elevations stating that any revisions were approved. Even if John Bissell waived the changes shown on the drawings submitted today, what has been constructed is different from those drawings, including different railings, a window replaced by a sliding glass door, and an additional light placed by this door. We find that these changes are significant enough to warrant further review by the Architectural Design Board. Please submit drawings or pictures reflecting what has been constructed for review by the Architectural Design Board. Regarding the parking issue, this is to confirm what we had discussed on November 10! U998 when you came into the office. To allow occupancy of the five condominiums and (2,888 square feet of office only, we -calculated the following parking requirements;' --- - -_ �5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / Condo = 2888 sq. ft.-office @ 1 space / 800sq._ft._(no on -site customer service)_= 4 spaces i Total = 14 spaces required for only the uses described -above Provided = .19 spaces_in the lower parking area-, If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220. I will be in the office on Monday, Tuesday (afternoon), and Thursday of each week. Sincerely, Meg G'�uwell, AICP Planner cc: Warren LaFon, Architect S Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International - Hekinan, Japan • • MEMORANDUM Date: November 19, 1998 To: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer From: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer r 1 /w Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 — 3rd Avenue North (ADB 97- 113) Building Permit 97 — 0575 The developer submitted directly to me a revised plan on November 17, 1998, please see the attached revised plan. The developer remains to address / submit the following plans: 1 Submit a civil plan showing the old and the proposed driveway location. The plan submitted on November 17, 1998 is unclear. Detailed civil plan should be submitted showing the treatment of the alley. 2 Submit the proposed driveway cross section with elevations and dimensions. The proposed driveway cross-section, elevation, and dimension must be prepared by an engineer. 3 The Planning and Building Departments must approve the relocation of the driveway, they might ask for additional information, please coordinate with both departments. City of Edmonds IV Community Services Department Engineering Division s :.. CITY OF EDMOND.S " BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Inc 189p. Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant RECEIVE® December 10, 1998 DEC 10 iss$ ENGINEERING Mr. Ola Groset Groset Construction 931 12th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Soundview Plaza @ 110 3rd Avenue North, Permit #970575/#980471 The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the City has extended the deadline for the submittal of professional engineered alley plans for the subject project until December 23, 1998. As indicated -in the City Engineer's letter dated 11/30/98 it is our understanding that the plans prepared by Vern Bower, P.E., dated 11/9/98, will need to be altered due to your difficulty in obtaining an agreement from the neighboring property owner. Thus, revised alley plans are required. Please be advised, the City shall not grant further administrative extensions without written requests submitted by either you or the property owner. r Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Jim Markezinis Paul Mar, Community Services Director Jim Walker, City Engineer P.Gardy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator O Incorporated August 11, 1890 Y Sister Cities International = Hekinan,.Japan 1nC.189v • CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant November 23, 1998 RECEIVED N O V 2 3 4998 Mr. Ola Groset ENGINEERING 931 12`h Avenue North. Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Soundview Plaza @ 116 3rd Avenue North, Permit #980471 This letter is a follow-up to the City letter dated 11/23/98 from Meg Gruwell regarding the need for Architectural Design Board (ADB) approval for exterior changes that were made to the subject building without first obtaining City approval. Since the Planning Division has made the decision that ADB review is required to approve these changes, the request to obtain a partial temporaryoccupancy is hereby suspended until this discretionary approval is decided. Please contact Meg Gruwell directly for ADB submittal information and a date for the next available ADB meeting. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 425-771-0229. Thank you, W-Al Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Paul Mar, Community Services Director RmiWidlker City Engineer Rob Chave, Planning Manager ' Jim Markezinis, Owner @ 18826 Fremont Avenue, Shoreline John Westfall, Fire Marshal Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.,W STRUCTURAL DESIGN P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046-1697 December 11, 1998 City of Edmonds Building Division 121 - 5`h Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Jeanine Graf Subject Soundview Plaza Alley Driveway Revision 3rd Avenue N Edmonds, WA 9802 Drawings by C-G Engineering SKl , SK3 & SK3 Dated 12/9/98 Dear Jeanine: • EDWIN F. BAKER, P.E PRESIDENT RECEIVE® DEC 1 4 1998 PERMIT COUNTER We have reviewed the referenced alley revisions to provide access to second floor parking. The removal of the curb and top of the retaining wall do not have an adverse effect on the structural integrity of the building. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. y1� Edwin F. Baker, P.E. President V/0"MMA EXPIRES 2 / 10 f-, 6628 212TH S.W. • LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 . (206) 771-6666 FACSIMILE (206) 771-6558 e'' h • BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.,* STRUCTURAL DESIGN P.O. BOX 1697 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046-1697 December 11, 1998 City of Edmonds Building Division RECF.IVED 121 - 5`h Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 DEC 1 4 1998 Attention: Jeanine Graf EW®UTER Subject : Soundview Plaza Alley Driveway Revision 3rd Avenue N Edmonds, WA 9802 Drawings by C-G Engineering SKI, SK3 & SK3 Dated 12/9/98 Dear Jeanine: EDWIN F. BAKER, P.E. PRESIDENT We have reviewed the referenced alley revisions to provide access to second floor parking. The removal of the curb and top 'of the retaining wall do not have an adverse effect on the structural integrity of the building. . Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, BAKER ENGINEERS, INC., P.S. Edwin F. Baker, P.E. President 1-7,11111?F LYFI'IE,�_�.� .io/ 6628 212TH S.W. . LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON.98036 . (206) 771-6666 FACSIMILE (206) 771-6556 • • Date: To: From:. Subject: MEMORANDUM December 15, 1998 Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer c?064— Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 3rd Ave. N.(ADB-97-113) (Building permit #970575) The Engineering Division received the attached building permit revision on December 14. Jim Walker had you work with the engineer and developer on this earlier. The developer/builder is extremely anxious to get this issue resolved. Please review this set of plans as soon as possible and return to me with your comments so I can get authorization to construct from Jim Walker. If you need more information, please check the ADB file and earlier correspondence with the applicant. Please return your review comments and requirements to me as soon as possible, so I may prepare a letter to the applicant or work to obtain construction approval from Jim Walker. Your cooperation in initiating a prompt review is appreciated. Thank you.. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION groset.doc i MEMORANDUM Date: December 16, 1998 To: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer From: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer.) t,\ Subject: Building Permit Revision for Groset at 110 — 3`d Ave. N. (ADB 97-113)_ (Plan Check 97 —575) In order to complete the review of your revised building permit application, the following traffic issues should be addressed: 1 Please submit the new parking lot configuration due to the relocation of the driveway along the alley between 3`d Avenue N. and 4'h Avenue N. 2 The proposed speed hump is NOT allowed. Please see drawing SK-2. 3 Please provide a detailed section along the south side of the proposed driveway, see SK-1 comment. Thank you. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division City of. Edmonds. RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION _. I V PERMIT P 't N b eM um er: 1✓;� 2 7 1993 Issue Date �_�'qq� - ;W j�oaSA� dress or Vicinity of Construction: Al ]�� Randn�l 1 I fl — 3rA Ava _ W_ j p B7 Type of Work (be specific): GTF, to oven cut aaphal o expose the n.c• 189 existing `facilities so P.U.D. can set (replace). a new pole. " C. Contractor: rTF ttnrrhv�est Incorporated ��+ Contact: Terry Anderson 425/771-8683 Mailing Address:2312C w. Casino _ Rd. evrt. Phone: Linda) 425/710-0945 State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side:Sewer Permit (if applicable): r ' - - — -- _ E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family INSPECTOR: El City Project ❑ ❑ Other INSPECTOR:( (PUD, GTE, WNP, ATER) F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes []No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEAINITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any . kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKA•fANSHIP AND AIA TERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. EST[AfATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCH IS COMPLETED., BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes.. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the,working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. `''l" I have read the above statemen available on site at all times for and the pink copy of the permit will be Signature: y off._ - Date:. 11_1b_Q87 David Squire ECog�•Moo�nor�9en ccess Design CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER _�UnB 3b DAYS RIGHT OF WAY FEE: • 0� DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 111: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: r RESTORATION FEE: y� n T OTAL FEE:.._ .....RECEIPT.N.O,: ISSUED BY : NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION YES O NO Partial Work Inspection. by ' P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: 04/16/98 15:34 9�aa�PR -Os� <--/V Qj4h Ao ,rose Cud' 2��3 /° t )64�i ny f4he awAI �rl U, power �,o se4 AM,W /PPlei, 3 rd Ave �Y NO. 112 902 '`�`�=��"��k'tf�'€-1`k'L"i-"-. ?„v':t_..-,'�,y7+P•k��.n)-s4f°Y„r, a,...d �. � •F_r_.. '�`,�`;✓a-».t��w.;�„=n.-��J,.�. �1„&i.'.�. w v.r:�ro..�„'�,��h*' �, •r�+� �.,. } r t .� `,.,-rA r.C'rii '4tt-,:�.:A",?: r ..c" t � 9ii �v• d' �+- :.ii •'\n• ,City, of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number 9B - /o Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction:], e a o In c - .1g9p B. Type of Work (be specific): nn �.ram....� A. l l e,.t of o a (.. � e i c b •�• . ^�a I I U-� t I Q y C. Contractor: X17 -,c , .L (=) e-� , ,-4 1 Mailing Address: e::� � 1 . 1'2 cave n! d State License #: t _ �i, �:. R. _O 9Tr , �. � C - Contact: OL A Phone: ,mod 47 z - NN I o - -4 -4 n -,4 be `{ •• Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): 9 705 7S Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E.. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ,Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) A Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: O l-- INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : Yl Yes UNo G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $_ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have rea&the above availabl on site at all Frstand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the,permit will be purposes. / Q Date: - (Contractor or Agent) ' CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY. — TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS:_WW}grQf�ri� f Myc 7- b 0---ZMR 04JO AL sa RIGHT OF WAY FEE: go.,� DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I 1 L• RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: -�o — RECEIPT NO.: At3/ 0 ISSUED BY: ....................... . �� NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P'.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: LAYOUT LEGEND: B PADMOUNT TRANSFORMER ® HANDHOLE PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CABLE ----0 POLE AND OVERHEAD LINE ----PROPERTY LINE j — — RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE U EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING DUCT — — — — FUTURE DUCT ------- S------ SANITARY SEWER/MANHOLE ------- G------- GAS MAW -------T------- TELEPHONE SCHEMATIC: REFER TO SHT -1 DUCT BY CONTRACTOR OA 30' OF (D 4" PVC (EXISTING) BO 124' OF (2) 4" PVC (1-4" FUTURE) © 235' OF (2) 4" PVC (1-4" FUTURE) DO 0 OF (D .4" PVC TRANSFORMER ' CABLE ALL FOOTACES APPROXIMATE A- 2 9 5 9 3 22.5 KVA 12470 CND Y/7200-120/208V BY CUSTOMER FROM A-27550 TO A-29591 DIST VN- -Y 180' OF (3) VO AL CNCTRC NEUT DS JCKTO PRI IN 4" PVC SER MAKE PO REEL MAKE MAKE PO REEL i MAKE PO REEL V AU L T S BY CUSTOMER FROM A-29591TO A-29592 275' OF (3) VO AL CNCTRC NEUT DB JCKTD PRI IN 4" PVC A— 2 9 5 9 3 MAKE Po REEL MAKE PO REEL 7' x 5' z 2' VAULT RISER AND 7' x 5' x 6" KEYED LID W/A 60" x 1'9" ACCESS HOLE ! MAKE PO REEL A-29591 AND A-29592 FROMA-29592 TO 40' OF(3) VO AL CNCTRC3NEUT DB JCKTD PRI IN 4" PVC 4'8" x 4'8" z 3'6" CONCRETE VAULT AND (E MAKE PO EL 4'8" x 4'8" x 6" COVER W/A V x V DIAMOND PLATE LID MAKE PO REEL MAKE PO REEL SECONDARIES PROVIDED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY CUSTOMER i LOCATION 110 3RD AVE N. EDMONDS 98020 AREA SO COUNTY POLE NO SE V4S 23 T 27 R 3 DATE 3/30/98 fro NO 317168 REASON FOR WORK PROVIDE 30 PRIMARY UNDERGROUND DWG NO 124188 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAFTER DPA pyFp UGD NO 9078-2 SCALE NOTED GROSET 261 KW FOREMAN PRD(iID DATE WORK COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SUBSTATION MAPLEWOOD CIRCUIT NO 12-343 PHASE 1.2.3 FEES REQ'D ■YES allo ■EXERT a NOT EXO PT PARA�- ITEN�- ROAD CROSSINGS ONLY OVERHEAD OVHD CONDUCTORKT PH wDntx AGO FT APPV DATE 1 DESORPTION DCOUERCIAL REM CKT FT PH Lm• NET CKT FT REVISIONS ucm CONDUCTOR 12.47 KV PRIMARY UNDERGROUND Am 400 CKT FT 3 PH APPV NO, I DATE DESCRIPTION 0RESIDENTIAL RCKT FT d ■ COMMERCIAL, � BFEE f -PH NET 400 CKT PT LEA• 6710 PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) 08 . t 1,368.00 a TREE TRW SECONDARY UNDERGROUND a STATE BASIC FEEL aCpMY a tom. s • ED'S UNDERGROUND PLAT a . BASIC FEET W sEl>tlOED pByEERpq E� O NDT &FT0$_.8 PLAT CONSTRUCTION DATE SENT TO RM t FT a t . t DATE APPROVED STREET LIGHTS FOREIGN CONTACTS t. FT o t . f a GTNW ,PNt CRoSm(cs 0 CATV iM _c FT a t_ . t a JOINT TREWN GTNW a CATV WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY 0JDWT BORE GTNW a CATV ' AS -BUILT a P'O"RY a SECONDARY _ FT a t_ . t o POLE STENCILING FROM TO TAKE OFT POLE PRE-CONSTR REQUIREMENTS a TREE TRW a PUD LOCATOR o BAcacE D a ONE CALL GTE APPV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MISCELLANEOUS FEES VAULT t PERMIT f COST ESTIMATE t t t TOTAL OLEt GTE PAID RECEIPTS MEW SVCE NVLMTIDN4 POLES OCAS v-NAP c- Of LOCATION MIAP PAGE ENGINEER RICH AFDEM CUST PHONE (425)670-3208 PHONE KING PROBED PFONTED i VICINITY MAP LAYOUT TAGS i" - 40' 1 00 VAULTS A-29591THRU A-29593 O CABLE: 54432 THRU 54440 O) g$ S� ZCD 5 �� .4 - 91) June 26, 1998 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Ola Groset Construction 931 Twelfth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Groset: In the past few months, I have witnessed a continued violation of the "No Parking Zone" by construction vehicles along Third Avenue fronting Claire's Pantry. This particular area is designated with yellow paint and is signed. On numerous occasions I have requested that both you and your contractors not park your trucks within this zone and have discussed the sight hazards you are creating by parking there.. Your use of this zone has created sight hazards for both traffic and pedestrians, thus endangering the safety of the public. Because of the hazards created by your actions, I have been forced to involve the Edmonds Police Department. Sergeant Jeff Holmes and I have expressed our desire to work with you on a solution to the problem. I have discussed the problem with Assistant Police Chiefs Al Compaan and Greg Wean and Sergeant Jeff Jones, who have on numerous occasions sent officers to the site to remove vehicles from the zone. However, the Edmonds Police cannot perform continuous monitoring of the area. Again today I witnessed your personal vehicle parked in the zone with the rear bumper protruding into the crosswalk of Main Street. This is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Should I find that any construction vehicles are parked within the zone in the future, I will be forced to put a stop work order on your project and to request that the Edmonds Police issue citations and have the vehicle(s) removed until such time as the issue can be resolved by higher authority. Sincerely, ROY S. WHITCUTT CIP Specialist RS W/cmc C: Al Compaan, Asst. Police Chief Jamal Mahmoud, Traffjc Engineer Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • C:Vv1y Documents\Engnmg\CRSPNDCE\GroseLdoc Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • • ,�20&-3 I17C. 18913 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant July 1, 1998 Ola Groset Construction 931 Twelfth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Groset: Yesterday I witnessed your personal vehicle parked in the loading zone along Third Avenue fronting Claire's Pantry at 7:50 am and again at 1:50 pm. As stated in my letter dated June 26th, this is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. I have spoken to the Building Official and the Acting City Engineer as I.consider this matter to be of extreme importance. I have obtained a Stop Work Order from the Building Official and, under section 202d of the Uniform Building Code, am prepared to use it upon the next loading zone violation by any construction -related vehicles. The City has received complaints regarding the occupancy of the loading zone, and I am prepared to act on this issue. I have provided both verbal and written requests that you work with the City in honoring our regulations and requirements. Sincerely,. ROY S. WHITCUTT CIP Specialist RS W/cmc C: Don Fiene, Acting City Engineer Al Compaan, Asst. Police Chief Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • \\CITY2\SYS\ENGRIROYUNSPECISMGLE\PROCEDUR\GENERAL\GROSET2.DOCGROSET2. INC Sister Cities International = Hekinan, Japan 1nC.1890 • • £1) 403 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant October 19, 1998 Mr. Ola Groset, General Contractor 931— 12' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Commercial Construction at 110 Third Avenue North (Permit No 970575� Dear D4 .- et: This is a follow-up to a meeting Jim Walker and I had with you on your constriction site located at 110 Third Avenue North. The meeting was to address development concerns, including access from the upper level parking area into the alley, which was not shown on the original civil plans. As discussed, the City requires that you submit a drawing showing your proposal for gaining access to second floor parking from the alley. The drawing must include existing and proposed spot elevations, slope of the proposed access ramp at centerline and each edge, and existing and proposed profiles of the alley centerline across the entire frontage of the subject property. Additional information, such as drainage impact to neighboring property, may also be necessary. The drawing must be prepared by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the state of Washington. It is important that we receive this information for review as soon as possible. Final engineering inspection of your site cannot take place without City approval of this access. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, ORDY HYDE Development Services Engineer GCH/cmc c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator i Incorporated August 11, 1890 • \\CrrY2\SYS\ENGR\GORDY\GROSE73D.DOC Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan city of edmonds land use application 'ZI ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ®. e ❑ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # Ab6 A6- (I 5 ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION DATE L Lill . REC'D BY ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 11 � RECEIPT# � 7C�� Ell LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HEARING DATE ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT / STREET VACATION ElHE ❑ STAFF ❑ PBDB El CC ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ACTION TAKEN: ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED ❑ OTHER - qG _ APPEAL# . Applicant -1-J/M (f4lZR16 /I/"ZIN(S Phone 5i`� - S8913 Address /BRZ�'�IIlOtii'1', l�.-fcYZLEL/�E GSA • t( 33 ¢O Property Address or Location 110 3 4UF . �• Property Owner S,44ma Phone 54c«E Address ~ Agent A)AagE74 LA•F&,t Agrp-1 1FC- Phone 7'14L - 058 0 Address �Z� l�►H �( /�. �ftaA117� Tax Acc # Sec. Twp. Rng. Legal Description �71b �1TE�9-ttl Details of Project- or Proposed Use E The undersigned. applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the, processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting a ndant to this c 'on. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT Jr' , „it. `Grr. .. 1. +.:. a-,5, . ti. , -ry,� r .��ob.a;7•o°.?o/. �`+., .7„t.. vL; +tl �,: ,� r:, ...•eo-:�'L": T.�i1 "r�"' :,+,. ' � w+• - E'REC ED . .' 4 PERMIT EXPIRES :.3 Z1� 0 {.; . -CITY OF EDMONDS :. PERMI USE RoZ G ZONE NUMB CONSTRUCTION .PERMIT,,APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS. V } O NER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOTO. LID NO. w AILINGD LID F EE $ ' z A/ -. •. � PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP approved p RWPermlt /y ;, .•• Required CITY C , • ZIP - TELEPHONE_ - .. - EXISTING, PROPOSED Street We Permit Req'd' ..n Inepeetloe Required,, i "O*APa ..6,0} ///// j n !+ REQUIRED DEDICATION FT ' 'i Sklewalk Required Underground, "aired - - • Widng re 13 NAME METER SIZE LIN E SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES RV REQUIRED F ' :. c.. i' .. YES ❑ NO ❑ is ADDRESS REMARKS w Z OWNER%CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE O CITY ZIP , :F •,- TELEPHONE , :., D 0- i NS ui,%1,S. reF j-771_;&&6 //: ro DRI✓� A 14 ce' �S 39'-v". r�,q/Z IIVIv .5c� NAME Cow eLi IiWC e. ENGINEERING REVIEWED/PATE " ADDRESS 91190 = FIRE REVIEWED BY _ ,.. DATE w¢ CITY ZIP . "' TELEPHONE �- V10 0r.� U. STATE LICENSE.NUMBER -EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BV• VARIANCE OR CU ,SHORELINE ( FRADB# -' r —INSPECTION BOND „ YES QNp POSTED a O w J ERTY X A COUNT P RCEL NO O os SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED• HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED EXP Nit N6 ❑r NEW ... ❑ RESIDENTIAL• ❑ PLUMBING / MECFI' " LOT',COVERAGE ', ALLOWED ,PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)"' ' PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) , FRONT . SIDE, ,REAR" FRONT UR SIDE REAR AUDITION COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE 087' CHANGE N � NL il:'PARKING'.,"LOT OF USE NG ? REMODEL ❑ ` APARTMENT', ❑ SIGN + REQ'D PROVIDED AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE" g REPAIR '.. GRADING ,.. FENCE. ❑ ❑ '. CYDS ❑ A5 Z-� *. "�4 qQ0 Z�Z6 G�cU. (`�_'X:. FTj R MA KS.: DEMOLISH. " i TANK r• {. ❑ OTHER ❑ ❑ ; A'. o+�s-L RAGE .. RETAINING WALL •�� G6AG2f3RF ❑ ❑ RENEWAL o a (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR%CTI� Y) P • N, t CH C Y TYPE F ONSTRUCTION` C OCCUPANT GROUP" C m NUMBER A OF ]f NUMBER OF DWELLING ORITICAL AREAS" SPECIAL N P CTOR o STORIES \� UNITS REQUIRED YES L��R,."E",_/V6OCCUPANT ' LOAD i _.. DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE i'. REMARKS " ►, PR OGRESS: INSPECTIONS PER UBC'108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D o A ill e. VALUATION ' FEE - •' - PLANCHECKFEE HEAT SOURCE "' GLAZING %, LOT SLOPE / BUILDING' (/ PLAN CHECK NO:. Y. vl=sTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL".. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS•PERMIT'COVERS WORK TO. BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. AN CONSTRUCTION ON;THE PUBLIC _ DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS; DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES; ETC.) WILL REQUIRE. GRADI G/F SEPARATE PEAMISSION" w PERMIT APPLICATION:' 180 DAYS •w- STATE SURCHARGE PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE, INFORMATION ENG. REVIEW FEES N w APPLICANT, ON BEHALF.OF. HIS OR HER'SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS .. IN INTEREST, AGREES'TO ENG. INSPECTION FEE INDEMNIFY; DEFEND AND, HOLD HARMLESS fiFIE CITV'OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, 'ITS OFFICIALS, EMP.LOYEES,'ANDAGENTS FROM ANY ANDcc , ALL CLAIMS FOR NATURE,ARISINGDIRECTLYORINDIRECTLY IN9PE6 4ON:FPE ,' 1 x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT.:"ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMEDTOMODIFY,WAIVEORREDUCEANYREQUIREMENTOFANYCITYORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT REC T / C "' NOR LIMIT,IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE - V GJ x . ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." :,. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RECEIPT Ls '� af I HEREBY. ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION. . GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM.THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATIONf APPROVAL THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This application is nIOot a permit until signed by the l signers, IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STAT.E'OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR 'INSPECTION. Building Official or his/her Deputy: and paid, and recei is acknowledged • r .WORIKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27- .., pt in space provided. . TUBE (OWNE/R],OR AGENT) ` DATE SIGNED (425) ' DAT kiENTION 771.�OZZO ItIGRE EXT 333 ATE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR, STRUCTURE UNTIL U � / A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL' OR A CERTIFI= 771'OZG� CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 C//�� ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR FAX � PINK OWNER srda - GOLD -ASSESSOR m= / tC r USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS " ZONE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: APPLICATION ' . NUMBER`"�' JOB. SUITE/APT # OWNER NAME/NAME:OF BUSINESS D/Q� /A� :':, /i. ADDRESS', /� /►'IA2Kf_2i�1I 1° 13P VIE {,H� � LEGAL DESCAIPTIIONN CHECK SCUiBDIVISION NO. LID NO. w MAILING ADDRESS O 10 30 / PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP: TESCP Approved ❑ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER. RW Permit Required ❑ \ (, t 7 ([ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION .6�1/Yl a 6 U. / ( )�R / °J� '.G / I L1 Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ ') PS tp / - 7 PROPOSE!) Inspection Required ❑ NAME Sidewalk Required ❑ ¢ METER SIZELINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES - PRV REQUIRED W ADDRESS YES ❑ NO O _ REMARKS - ? L) ¢ a CITY ZIP' `]TELEPHONE NUMBER w 0 Z NAB .; .,.,............. .- . - . w cc ADORES O ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY U ZIP — TELEPHONE NUMBER ¢ CITY , ....- .. ,.,.,. .. 2 .�. ___:..:.:._.:._..: _...... .__.. _ FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY w yy ¢ U STATE LICENSE �NUMBER �`r' PI ATION DATE ....._ ?' VARIANCE OR CU ADB # SHORELINE # Legal Description o "properly='iriclud'e'a`Il easements `' SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT p) 1 r Y11 �r COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED I PROPOSED ALLOWED I PROPOSED 0 N ' • t e . /� (o/r h'1�'r ExP LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS ) r� ! 1 QL rA q" f nEG L . AEC /'% F ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR i 0 u u 13 " rJC. I�G �tr . z Property Tax Account C �i �% . �1�' 1 / i) r, 'i „ OQ U LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE v V a Parcel No. 0 ,f / (J V V „( / REMARKS NEW RESIDENTIAL' lal PLUMBING/MECH t r , COMPLIANCE OR �. ADDITION COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE 46, APT.BLDG. i, a] REMODEL 9i(>iN: i 1:1REPAIR ❑ GRADING E] FENCE X—� OCCUP CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ICOPE r� ANT CYDS. , WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL DEMOLISH El INSERT HOTSPECIAL INSPECTOR. AREA OCCUPANT. El ,TUB/SPA REQUIRED,YES LOAD GARAGE M RETAINING CARPORT' ROCKERY WALL/, E _RENEWAL REMARKS " 0 (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS'OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 = MAIL 69-DIFIt r-r In U8 NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL o OF DWELLING r AREAS 0 STORIES 1UNITS. NUMBER -' DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) l !� l FINAL INSPECTION REOUIRED VALUATION FEE rti h1 PLAN CHECK FEE f r BUILDING A y } HEAT SOURCE: - GLAZING,}'r7")') Ia,p,•',P `J 'W o/d PLUMBING Plan Check No- ` /04_Y MECHANICAL. y This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL C•/ " Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc,) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, s employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of r' a whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance = of this permit. Issuance of this,permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT l o 1 0modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city. ordinance r x nor limit in any way the City's ability.to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." f, I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application;,that'the. information. give' ,is correct; and that I am the owner, orthe .duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL r authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ;',ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY, THE signed by the Building Official or his/her 2 Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insur ce rid RCW 18.27. INSPECTION ' acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATU &ij IOWNE OR AGENT! DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT �,,�,,,.,�j OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE OF DIMO DS CALL FOR RELEA ED ' r ' J DATE '! ATTENTION INSPECTION i` ° ' , IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING -OR STRUCTURE /A/1AA/ AN CERTIFICATETIL A FINAL OCCUPANCCTION HAS Y HAS EN ABEENDE N 'GRANTED. UBC 711 0 / /O ORIGINA'L -File 1YELLOW�— Inlspectror SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor " " &L• ,L) /c_) A USE` PERMIT J 6 CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE uG NUMBER + CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB A t SUITE/APT # OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS �� /,✓/� LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION ;NO. LID NO. w MAILING ADDRESS !, / /off / 3 / / �h / V • (I �1 `7 ?�'12 TESCP Approved ❑ � ! ! � �%--�� PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. Z P TELEPHONE NUMBER RW Permit Re uired ❑ + CITY I 1 EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required ❑ Sidewalk Required. ❑ NAME W U"-7.V C V METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED a YES ❑ NO ❑ ADDRESS ; 1 REMARKS - W CITY ZIP �i,�r v TELEPHONE NUMBER zs-sv Z Z W NAME o ADDRESS J r `1 / A !�•(" .3 4)/ ¢ 0�l ¢ Z U ENGINEERING MEMO DATED ' _ ' REVIEWED BY CITY ZIP I .--r. L - G!w 17 TELEPHON NUMBER J .�•� ,( FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY W I 7 7 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATIONDATE VARIANCE OR CU 1PB # SHORELINE # Legal Description of Property - include all easements "'" p" SEPA REVIEW 91, - ' ^' SIGN AREA HEIGHT Z O a N uj �/' COMPLETE EXEMPT � EXPcr ALLOWED PROPOSE � ALLOWED PROPOSED �� • • LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED �- REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR r1 C PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT L/R SIDE REAR z NIL z a Property - Tax Account L /�a/� ., ,r)<ry'�� Parcel No. C V (! C �L +L�' LOT AREA P NNING REVIEW BY DATE a 2 ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING/MECH REMARKS b r K, txzn On 6, COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION OMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE !!i APT BLDG J- -'EL' SIGN REMODEL SIGN CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION �/ CODE %.,•.� OCCUPANT GROUP• - �``� GRADING ❑ FENCE CYDS. REPAIR (x—FT) W O 00 DEMOLISH ❑ WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUB/SPA Ej CARPORT ROCKERY GARAGE RETAININGWALL/ RENEWAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED •- YES AREA i d- OCCUPANT LO D REMARKS C PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 z C (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: NUMBER OF .•.----• STORIES NUMBER OF �� DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL AREAS,,,,..,,,,,,.,_,.,,,, NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ".� •"'� VALUATION FEE �[/w�,i(,�+%��l •� !' •vr'�c.`:� 1/ ! G••c: /G,'%�� PLAN CHECK FEE A ._ •7� i ). BUILDING 7 r ji'•L�f/ HEAT SOURCE: "•.-% /��' r GLAZING o/Q PLUMBING Plan Check No. Z 0 MECHANICAL �� _ -X' 1Vo GRADINGIFILL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE I Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE o w 5 a = i "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision."-' ENG. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE C i 1p I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES . This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance aria52L.18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. 'SIGNATURE (OWNER Off• AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT ��r OFFICIAL'S SI NAT}.• E ATE Cr'�/ CITY OF / 4 EDMONDS L•�..... f' %7�} ' RELEASED /® �. %"'. �' DA ECALL FOR ATTENTION INSPECTION �.,_./. ;.,..._,_ -%'�; -`� �� p �,``' OCCUPY A BUILDING ORSTRUCTURE IT TI UNLAWFUL TO USE OR BU L 771 0220 UNTIL'• A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR � 11 ORIGINAL —File YELLOW —Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC,.,..., � SECTION 109 %/ ..J PINK— Owner GOLD — Assessor ""'f :I souuov(E ""Yaw_ Ji 0 usE CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE PERMIT NUMBR 3$ CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION 'OB Ito -7///SUITE/APT# OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS ,�`' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. ZMAILING ADDRESS 3 ^ _ f .� O PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER RW Permit Required ❑ T EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd El(''" S 412-3 /4 PROPOSED Inspection Required ❑ NAMt Sidewalk Required ❑ cc METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED w ADDRESS YES ❑ NO ❑ 3 I'_ (9 = REMARKS Z U ¢ a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER W Z r7 NAME I c ¢ AD O ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY ¢ / TELEPHONE NUMBER ~ e + i "`� d ( �p (- �, ,� r� FIRE MEMO ATE REVIEWED BY W Z ) _ IC/F[��SE�N11MBE PIRATIO DATE?o U. VARIANCE OR CU ADB # SHORELINE # Le a Description Of Property - include all eents g p -p` y asemSEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT ZO �p V. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED I PROPOSED ALLOWED I PROPOSED ¢ EXP w _ LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) o ALLOWED I PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR t7 a Z O z Property g Tar Account 4� L ''"_ ih10 �„ LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE a Parcel No. ��'` I i REMARKS NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBINGIMECH COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION ISaJ COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE REMODEL APT.BLDG. SIGN GRADING FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE lJ O ODE OCCU ANT REPAIR CYDS. (X_FT) P tZ� DEMOLISH ElINSERTWOODSOVE SWIM POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR ARE �p y, OCCUPANT/ INSERT H07 TUB/SPA REQUIRED 40. P IL LOAD GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ 0 YES CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL REMARKS o PROGRESS I SPECTIONS PER UBC 108 0(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: j _ AlLkEd ''''''ff m le w NUMBER N 3rhBER OF CRITICAL o OF a��J., D�dyJELLING AREAS _ C STORIES :/ UNITS ..- NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE_OONE'(ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING (ram' 7- L ( A 4-(ec&liPLUMBING Plan Check No. ME6+K i®Arh��- This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL ' Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, f employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of a whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance = of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance i Inor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT D.UE provision." 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duty ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa-. WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is Lion Insurance aria Rom' 7. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIG TORE (OWNER O AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT r ` / CITY OF OF IAL'S S NATURE DATE EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR ELEAS(D , .1 E INSPECTION G- IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE O��O 1q UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771 ORIG NAL — File YELL W — inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor l" f�/f� f♦' M't,�',�'i �p� ,a CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE PERMIT NUMBER w�" CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION `s"r roe ADDRESS s SUITE/APT j •,; j '4�fi a % OWNER NAME ;NAME OF BUSINESS i __. - r . u, ; :+, C `•, ,) ?' f �., -a, e LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. w Z MAILING ADDRESS $ J. 03 ', F r fl.., dr_ yy y�.�"` �y">,i:JE,;i r�+,,�; %_.-v� P PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved' ❑ PP CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER �--�' �'%'•� RW Permit Required ❑ cggl 3 tJ. F y+' ;..✓''I'`= '- J EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd Of Inspection Required ❑ NAME, _ PROPOSED ,[`�j ?°., t� Sidewalk Required LY +, / Fe'; •- j,, �,,:}-� 4""-,';'h i A._e METER IZE �r LIM E SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV RE UIRED ¢ w a WO ADDRESS - t '� p YES)( NO + ..-•TELEPHONE , JI Cc a CITY ZIP NUMBER l ` �i✓ri_ r •'y x3-dv' ..JI ...11 -+1.£d NAME Q w ¢ O ADDRESS y i'�?�'�f, �yr, REVIEWED BY . ENGINEERING MEMO DATED w Q F CITY yH ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Z .. �1..• f••�••e� �.••!"-, f. fit. .,> FIRE MEMO DATED f REVIEWED BY w O .�, cr STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE r` ,'%""✓,,r`�'-ems X """`` SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADS NO. Legal Description of Property - include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE t� EXEMPT �j Ada '1�'� ✓� SHORELINE0 EXP r Fr tr f� f U VARIANCE OR CU PLANNINGREVIEW BY r. DATE y _ 5 a SETBACKS — FEET "' HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE Z w Property FRONT f SIDE REAR ¢ Tax Account ¢ �� F Parcel No. Y ;� _: }`� 7 .. REMARKS / y ., ,,5 a NEW RESIDENTIAL r PLUMBINNGG/MECH r��. yV ADDITION Z COMPLIANCE OR✓"' } COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE APT. BLDG. s REMODEL SIGN G. 9IN FENCE �(� ,jJ� F REPAIR IF�i..l �,f CYDS. I x FT) CHECKED BY [ "�,s✓yA .TYPE`OF CONSTRUCTION CODE `_ 1I +j �r✓4fr OCCI�PANTI aY;a & D �'!�- ,d r t a�G,}OUaP f A t WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL DEMOLISH 1_ F.INSERT HOT TUB/SPA _^.! SPECJAC - .AFy§r'34 REQUIRED SEG70R ;�' �,'g�',,. f OC Ct'UP D GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT RENEWAL '' _YES REMARKS,,, ?•'t`�'1i�,„"'%L,eO �A+ . Z ROCKERY � },,.✓L� �..�,q f; _• .y ,�„a fie. ^-•, (""�' ft7 Q (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC a /Y�1-r:: ° f ... f✓,F�._fd. i '"°" �i D w NUMBER NUMBER) OFj CRITICAL 0 OF y DWELLING y AREAS �.1'•'�,! O STORIES "'"" UNITS NUMBER y DESCRIBE WORK TOO,.BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) ��gJ �, , l p• V.. S j '7 ,. 4`17-4/1 (' �'c's �,S�z. a,�- •,rvaf�;i'p .�"' -.. iy�."le!`:1�i>"� �✓; '- `,,'77r`,J.�`'+f.;�y r � ' + FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ee, ;47 VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEEa. HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING k " -- d' r A"f ✓ o / a p �0 PLUMBING I, {{ Plan Check No. a MECHANICALF_ This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewpiks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE `'mot _0 Permit Application: 186 Days �ToRnINAGr SEE S q y Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEES successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, p ~)`P Nil t- yWu'" m employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of -. i1' a = whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance this Issuance this be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPO IT of permit. of permit shall not a omodify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE L n, provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. 1 agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code oftthe State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is . tion Insurance and RCW 18:27—"11 INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATURE OWNER OR AGENT) 7 DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT \: +v' 4�' ,s 1 ., , vim/ - CITY OF OFFIC jL-S7 SIGH TURE DATE , y } i +� iJE,Jl l .-' 4 t'; ,l EDMONDS `'' i irlt� 6 ATTENTION'. ' / CALL FOR INSPECTION RELEP 6 8Y: DATE n f IT IS UNLAWFUL TOIUSE OR OCCUR Y A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE _ "�JX? • IL INSPECTION S BEHAS ABDE 771 —0220 s ORIG'I"NAL — File YELLOW = Inspector AN TIFINAL A EENN GRANTED. UOR BC -Assessor SECTION 109 1.f" +' PINK —Owner GOLD — 10247�.",i4— WINDOW SCHEDULE NO,/LOCATION MANUFACT. FRAME TYPEKAWNEER AIR SPACE MONDDEL %rVALUE AREA SIZE KAWNEER ALUM 1/2" TRIFAB .65 345.24 (4)12'-4 x 7'-0 ALUM 1/2" TRIFAB .65 252.24 (1)12'-0 x 21'-1 ©— -- MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 384.0 (16)6'-0 x 4'-0 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" "00 SERIES .65 417.78 (4)16'-6 x W-4 ® MILGUARD ALUM— 1/2" SERIES .65 86.63 (3)16'-6 x l'-9 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" 1100 SERIEMILGUARD .65 76.15 (1)12'-2 x 6'-4 ALUM i/2" 1100 SERIES .65 21.05 (1)12'-2 x l'-9 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES •65 56.04 (1)12'-0 x 4'-8 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 336.24 (12)6'-0 x 4'-8 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 18.68 (1)4'-0 x 4'-8 TOTAL: 1994.05 TOTAL GLAZING AREA: 1994.05 TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA: 9,473.44 ACTUAL GLAZING AREA PERCENTAGE v t✓ (LINE A DIVIDED BY LINE B X 100) 10.24% ALLOWED GLAZING AREA PERCENTAGE O�=/MAXIMUM (DETERMINED BY COMPLIANCE OPTION): OPTION N 12% RETAIL & OFFICE DOOR SCHEDULE OPENING DOOR FRAME w n REMARKS NO. SIZE TYPE MAT. I FIN. MAT. FIN. i 3' X 1' C AL FF AL FF 3' X I' C. AL_ FF AL FF _ + 3' X —I' C AL FF AL FF U 3' X I' C AL FF AL FF 3 X 6P D WD NAT WD NAT 7 2' X ray'` B WD NAT WD NAT -------^ 26 X 6P B WD NAT WD NA- 3 X$ B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 10 3 X �� B IUD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN, RATED 11 2& X 6° B WD NAT WD NAT 12 2c' X� B WD NAT WD NAT 13 3' X C AL FF AL FF 20 MIN. RATED 14 3_ X Eg B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 15 3' X 1' C. AL i=F AL FF 20 MIN. RATED 1 f 3 X 6H B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 17 3 X 6g B WD NAT WD NAT 1-HR RATED (1S 3 X h$-- B WD NAT WD NAT 1-HR RATED 19- 3 X e B WD NAT WD NAT — 3 X tv°^ B WD NAT WD NAT _— - - _1-HR_RATED 1-Nib RATED 21 3 X 6P D WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 2 3 X 6P D WD NAT WD NAT - 20 MIN. RATED 23 3 X 6P D WD NAT WD NAT - 20 MIN. RATED �24 3 Xg B WD NAT WD NAT _ 20 MIN. RATED 25 3 X 8- B WD N47 WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 26 3' X `i' C AL FF AL 20 MIN. RATED 27 X 0 E3 WD NAT WD _FF NAT 20 MIN. RATED 2i3 �3 3' X -1' C AL FF AL FF v 20 MIN. RATED 29 3' X 1' A HM P HM P I-HR RATED 3� 3' X 7' A HM P HM P 1-HR RATED A LINE OF OFFICE A15dvE 24' 0• cY I J N I I `cf-a TYP. W TYP. � I , I ' -- CATCH BA51N w/ OIL / WATER SEPARATO �Z,.� 9 SEE CIVIL DRWrs5. Op i rrP. 3'-0" - - - "BOMANITE" STAMPED CONCRETE j l w =� 10'--0' 8'-9 1/2" 2' X 2' PATTERN In ' COLOR A5 5ELECTED V 2 CARS O oo '- 4" PAINTED I CTYPJ 7 I I ri I A7 SEE SHT. A& FOR TYP. 00 ,`. nP TOILET ROOM LAYOUT `` HDCP SI I I i Y-O" T' I CARS i RETAIL II Ip I' 0 I I� •I f 00 SEE 5HT A3 FOR STAIR ,ErAILs ^N --- - - I (131 --- -- -- - ---- - _ -- - -- - - ---� --- -- -- ELE V. 1EL ti 3 0 - EQUIP. _ I � o - -- - I lro' SLIDING GATE I I - --- L-055T f w/ AN DOOR OOR III . I � 1 N UP _ o 1 0 -o" 1 I - -- RI5E - u-1 - III � f 2j I ® q i (3)� I I I I 1 -9 6'-9" l� Y 1'-2 25/32" �t — :N 5TOR-— :o SEE SHT. A-7 5'-0" ; M i i FOR DETAILS 1 I ---- - Ifni �I �I ' o - I - I 23/32 1 1 RAIL_ 3'-0' - I I , I I 9 3 4., 1501 ! SF j i - - - - ---- - - - - - -- - - -- — - -._ _. _ 1 (5,) H �+ I ,- 5 CARS N I II Ii 76 , 00 I I 3,-0" STEEL TUBE GATE j FLAT SLOPE CONC. WALK--' ; GARAGE VENT FAN 0o UP LOCATION - MTD i - NIGH ON WALL 2'-0• ' � I I I j z i LLI I 1 Ist FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" =1'01' N I N 1 a j • I of i I II , 0 W . , j A4AIN 1L 009 �305 1f = EE- C4lz.�:-; 'Zqp— c_ >e. — � - f t% -- -7 6q-M5 5P;R CA(z`� 1 D = ZZ. CAPS o 5/81, TyF:`E "XI, GIrPI50 tv BOTTOM OF TRUSSES ACT TILE CEILING I tv Iro I, o/c W/ ,PE "x" G*yF,E3D 51DE JN6 IF REQV L INE 1'YP. WALL SECtION SCALE: 3/4'Y'O" REFLECTED CLG. PLAN 6CALE: 1/6" = 1'-0` TA6zE C-$ NG ro CURS —36" HIGH RAILING OVERro" CONC. CURS WHEEL 57OF 0 SEE SHT. A - FOR STAIR DET. UOPR OI o I ' 2 UP 20R --J O.H. DOOR 4 .3/4 HR. RATED 5 CARS _H --------- -— l _ .. _.-_._ _ C '41 HDGP SICxN i `� PAWING x OFFICE FIRST FLOOR = 30SISF = 4 CARS OFFICE 2 Nr-> FLOOR �012 0.,P - ro CARS CONDOS ( FIVE UNITS le CARS 0 ® _ 20 CARS Rear,> FIRST FLOOR STALLS = �143 CARS SECOND FLOOR STALL c 14 CARS 1.3 EXTRA CARS LJ U U H EE:] L 0557- CONC. SLAB w/BROOM FINISH Cal ` ` 4" PAINTED LINE' C21 io BLDG. STOR04GE 3 CAR: l 24.-011 101-011 - ---- --- -- ------- - � CONC. CURB- 4 CARS 4 CARS x, OFF IC 4'- 4"PAINTED LINE z I ITCHEI I CFFICr COP"r /I OFFICE 6TOR, 13'-0" 101-3" T- 10 112 ...... ...... I MO ABLE PA�rITIONS tv" OFFIck I I ci=, I c, E OFFICE RECF. CONFFRENCE iI� RAIL EXIST. w4v iiii-ol COP'T, FAX 5UPPLY - i U- — - KITCHEN 11 9'-4 1/2" WOMEN C� 3/4 HFZ RATED EXIST. VERIFY EXIST. ACON EfRENCE 5ECRETAR,,11 MEN . �N� 31 5 TO COATS 0, MA I � I OI � I � I I I WALL - OFFICE L4 SEE ELEV. HIGH RAIL URNACE UFRtNAC (o UP 9 -10 112" 9'- 4 114 T-7 I it 19R HIM k., AREA OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1100± 5F 2nd FLOOR PLAN ��a 50ALE: 1/8"40" DECK ABOVE —1 �j SEE 514T. A - FOR DETAILS 5/6" TYPE "X" GYP'BD ,w BOTTOM OF TRUSSES ACT TILE CEILING tv16"o/cw/ "PE "x" GYP'BD TIDE ING IF REQ'D INE i'iP. 1UALL 5ECt1ON SCALE: 3/4"=I'0" 3 - TUBE R. FIXTURE REFLECTED CLCx. PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = I'-m" TALE v` c� i A." ) (E3 i I �i ) j 1 O G _ 1 i I ' I , ' I I , 36" HIGH (LING OVER 6" CURB " 6CONC. U C _ ! I _ .. I I WHEEL STOP Oj � SEE SHT. A- w FOR STAIR PET. i. P130 r" I UP 20R i OFFIC� - _ �- 12'-0" TYP _ s MO ABLE I :� C w, 9 ( ; I ' O.N. DOOR PA�ITIONS , 1 I �y I `:, i 3/4 HR. RATED 5 CARSin RECY6LP TRA�N j. FAX ! 6� OFFIC i or FICE i HDCP SIGN PAWING ( ! i OFFIC� I CONF} RENCE I I i OFFICE FIRST FLOOD: - 30515F - 4 CARS OFFICE 2 ND FLOOD:' _ 00-12 SF 6 CARS KITCHEN I CONDOS ( FIVE UNITS) A4 10 CARS ' 20 CARS REQ'D w FIRST FLOOR STALL:') - 1113 CARS -� SECOND FLOOR ST/114 - 14 CARS 9'--4 1/2" FURNACE i ! 13 EXTRA CARS �.. _ . I E -- RECP.- ' WOMEN 1 N CONC. SLAB L 33 , IJ•`J ILL (i Nx II'-!" ®IIiII _. _ (27' II ( ..:: �w.)a .jiF ! I .. w/BR_ %O�`�O'n-M "F�INISH2 (2F RAIL - i(22! 4�" PAINTED AINTED _._—.L^�IN T-N= 3/4 RATED EXIST. BLDG. STORAGE 3 CAR W T. '- -;j ro CONC. CURB EXIST.CONERENCE ECRETAR MEN � X I = �U I .4 I fit-, ti i N t f I � 4 I CARS COATS \a Ca 4 CARS FI OFFIC > - ` --- - --- 4 PAINTED LINE i I I CIE I 331 0 OFFICP COf Y P, OFFICE l OFFICE 3' I WALL STOR. <V v 42" HIGH RAIL SEE ELEV. 1 UfRNACE ----- ._ /,,,� I ^. �. _ P �' UP ' L. --� I ? -Ip I' q _ I -9R I - �. ;G 9'-I© L2 4 1/4 '' - - -- - ` ✓ER. i / CONC. WALK � TRAN RM R DECK ABOVE � .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..-.._..------ ------ _.._.._.._..`.._..__.._..-.._..-.._.._.._..J SEE SHT. A - FOR DETAILS I AREA OF TENAINT 11" r-MLll1/EI-IENT I '� 1-188± SF 2nd FLOOR PLAN Val � � ��',�I �/�/G 6 �✓ 3.'�J -9 '��s`,14 E.; U WINDOW SCHEDULE NO./LOCATION MANUFACT FRAME TYPE AIR SPACE MODEL NO. `U VALUE AREA (FT2) SITE ZA KAWNEER ALUM 1/2" TRIFAB'I .65 345.24 (4)12'-4 x 7'-0 KAWNEER ALUM 1/2" IRIFAB 65 252.24 (1)l2'-0 x 21'-1 QMILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 384.0 (16)6'-0 x 4'-0 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" 1100 SERIES 65 417.78 ( )4 16'-6 x 6'-4 8 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SER�5 65 86.63 (3)16'-6 x 1'-9 B MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES •65 76.15 (1)12'-2 x 6'-4 Q MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 21.05 (1)12'-2 x 1'-9 0 _..---------• MILGUARD -------.-..-. ALUM 1/2" S1100ERIES .65 56.04 (1)12'-0 x 4'-8 ,J MILGUARD ._..---- ALUM ------- 1/ 2" - - 100 1 SERRIEIE S - .. _- .65 -- --._. 336.24 _-.._..-------- ------ (12)6'-0 x 4'-8 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" 1100 SERIES ------ .65 ------ 18.68 -------------- - (1)4'-0 x 4'-8 TOTAL: 1994.05 TOTAL GLAZING AREA: 1994.05 TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA: .._. __..._.-..._I-_ ............... --------- --- `ClACTUAL- GUYING AREA PERCENTAGE - (L.INI A DIVVIED BY LINE R X TOO) 10.24% 1 MAXIMUM ALLOWED GLAZING AREA PERCENTAGE - I �[1 (Df1F:RMINED BY COMPLIANCE OPTION): OPTION 11 12:' { I RETAIL & OFFICE DOOR SCHEDULE OPENING DOOR FRAME REMARKS NO, SIZE TYPE MAT. FIN. MAT. FIN. w 0 C AL FF AL FF 0. AL FF FF O _3_.X._I'. _......C_.. 5' X _' C AL FF -AL AL FF 3' X '1' C AL FF AL FF - 6 3 X D LUD NAT WD NAT . 7 _2 6X._68_- --B WD NAT WD ------------------ NAT ----- O 26 X 6° B WD NAT WD NA O 3 X 68 B WD N47 WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 10 3 X 6° Ei I WED N AT WD I NAT 20 MIN. RATED 1 1 26 X 6°' E3 WD I NAT WD NAT 12 2" X 6° B WD NAT WD NAT 13 3'7' C <AL FF AL FF -- --20 MIN. RATED 14 -X 3 X �° B WD NA- WD N,^,'F _- 201 MIN. RATED 15 3' X I' C AL FF- AL FF - 20 MIN_ RATED 16 3 X 6° B WV NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 17 3 X 6e B WD NAT WD NAT 1-NR RATED 18 3 X 'o° B WD NAT WD NAT 144R RATED 19 3 X 6° B WD NAT WD NAT I-1-1R RATED 0 3 X 6° B WD NA WD NAT I-HR RATED 21 3 X 6° D WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED - Q 3 X 6° - D WD NAT WD NAT - 20 MIN. RATED 3 3 X 6° - D WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED_ 24 3 X-6° B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED- 25 3 X �° B WD NA WD NAT -_ :, r2m MIN. RATED 26 3' X 1' C AL FF AL FF 20 MIN. RATED 27 3 X 6° B WD NAT WD NAT -20 MIN. RATED 3' X 1' C AL FF AL FF - 20 MIN. RATED 29 3' X A NM HM P 1-PR RATED _ 3' X 7' A NM _P P NM P 144R RATED N. rt G ALUt WOOD DOOR DOOR DOOR (.B C ► D X. A � C 23'--10 1/4• ' 7 3/ 4• I 1 + 1 2 _..0" � � I I ! I 1 i I ' �- LINE OF OFFICE ABOVE � OI I'. i 3'-- 0'-- "BOMANITE" 5TAMPED CONCRETE 18' -- 9 1 /'2. , 2' X 2' PATTERN COLOR AS SELECTED I r 7 I ' A 7.1 00: J TYP. i i 3'-0'• t , } t IRE TAIL !1350± SF NIEY N SEE 51-IT 43 ; FOR STAIR I�ETAIL5 N i 2,H o• 13'-0" I i �• UP � I I ! 19R In 10' - C1.. j ..n Ln + 3' 0" I 1 1. 1. 2 25/32 I i iI i 4.' H ' I `v SEE 5NT. A --I i 0 FOR DETAILS M I I j0 I I N Ielf h I u7� I •M I i I � I I 1'-2 23/32' I I (-4 DETAIL 'II 9 3 / 4:. _ I i I ' ti Lc) u� '• 9 3/4I 1 ! 3'-- 0" �- STEEL TUBE GATE FLAT SLOPE GONC. WALK ' UP I 1 i L1_.1 i V -`� # 8'--10 3/4 41-8 3/4. U� Sly D d i 1 1 8 ' - 0" c5 i I 24'-4 18'-3' 24'-0• 18'--4 ;4. I _ I I i I { 24' -0 }, jj R6 18' -(T` 9l i �> ! TYP. pp IYP.•.1 60 !; tI tn,I i CATCH BA51N w/ OIL / WATER 5EPAF'ATC�' Z�� ,1 9 SEE CIVIL DRUX]r& A7 TYP. I i r` I ti 'o IZ I I I a 2 CARS - 1 O a�; ~ 4" F'AINI*ED v Rs- I SEE 5NT. Aro FOR TYP- _ TOILET ROOM LAYOUT I i - - y NDCP SI r Q) r� - Z�o O60 6'-0 1 / 2 r � 1 I 13. ELEv. LE 1 EQUIP. '14. STOR. II 5TOR. 12 1st FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/SII =1'm" Lev I` v) r7" 16' 5L ID ING GATE ,--\ ! � Lu/ MAN DOOR N ! 4 ' 5 CARS 5 CAR ' I ti I i `-- GARAGE VENT FAN LOCATION - MTD I-•IIGN ON WALL t i 6 0'--- 8" i i 1 �1`tnlCl Rcc M I ' T i } • ti� l 0 1_✓ 9_-5 'P-CQ' 6TEEL 5TAIR 6ECTIQN SCALE: I/a' = IV i la TYCJ= so—s = A I I IGTCCG TYPE 'A' BALUSTER --� TEEL 5TAIR PLAN 2 5CALE:'141: I101 a. nrrr, e•-»1.11 5ALU5TEfR DETAIL SCALE:1'=I'0' 3/4' 5TEEL ROD 3'xli4' FLAT BAR STRINGE FIZE-AD IDE I AIL SCALE:1'=1'0' CHANNEL STRINGER NOTE: USE TYPE 'A' BALUSTERS ON INNER HANDRAIL WHERE SPACE ALLOWS, OTHERWISE USE TYPE '8' " "" - L PIPE 5QLU5TER DETAIL 1 SCALE:1' : V0' , t 5?EEL PIPE � BALlJ57ER pETAIL SCALE-, V-10' 3/4' STEEL ROD 4' O/C 2'x1/4' FLAT BAR Ins' SHEET METAL 8'-3" 23'-10 1 /4" 24'-4" 18'-3" 24'-0" TREAD TILE 7 3/4" g'x3' METAL �. I '-••0" NON -SLIP TREAD SCRIP �'_[;'t b' -•caI' _ I 1 I/2fa � 4'-0 + 6'-0" ��4'-U�� 6' -U�. 4'-0'-0 5' 0 3/4.1! 6 t �.. NIG4-1 RAILING OVER ro 1 CURB iQ WHEEL STOP I,,j41:• 1i040 T4i) li(J4f, Fi?AO i i I 3'_1' 2'_--6„ i :o j v c0 1 (V j i ' 5 CARS 9 \ A7 N---- �� OF7ICE HDCP SIGN i � N 7--? 1n ! I (-- 2439 t SF A7 - --- pp TYP. i SEE SNT. A-- FOR TOILET DET.'S j - N -- 9'-4 1 2" I I I I( i f I N; I f I ., , o, i co 26'-1 I • 2'-10 1/2' E -I ao j WOMEN I �i L o CONC. SL o :o _ 4PRTED w/BROOM F ®(22)3/4 (2?� j �C ;RAIL .------- --------.__ __ �231 BLDG. STORAGE 3'-9 1 /2" _o: � ;I v o I � I j -- --- ---------- 00I MEN Ln i 4 CARS l OFFICE � � o C41 'F.--- I cD 1188 f J! - - -- --- - - --- -- --- 4' PAINTED LINE — I o, I I 42" HIGH RAIL I o I F Ca 18'-4' �I 0 _ , ,2.. 0 24'- 1 0 1 /4' *3 -0: 8 �2" 25'-7" - I, 118'-0- 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/8'=I'0' Mo C. _ to ., .t. M rrr TYPE "X" GYP'BD BOTTOM OF TRUSSES 4CT TILE CEILINCs tv 16" o/c w/ "PE "x" CxYP'BD TIDE M IF REQ'D LINE TYFD. WALL 5ECTION xaLE 3,4:1e" REFLECTED GLCs.PLAN SCALE: Ire" : I' o" TALE I I I I I I I I I I I I _ 36" HIGH RAILINCa I I OVER 6" CURB 1 ��6" CONC. CURB , - SEE SHT. A- �- WHEEL STOP � ) FOR STAIR DET. I I :- I I I I I 1�' UP I I - 20R — — — — — - — — I I e OCESSO � � Jam, I I I I 12'-0" TI P. _ O.H. DOOR / PA—MO1 TIONS 5 CARS I 2 \� 3/4 HR RATED I �t I 2 FAX OFFIC O ICE HDGP SICsN PAWING OFFICE FIRST FLOOR = 30511W = 4 CARS t a ® OFFICE 2 ND FLOOR = 012 SF = 6 CARS CONDOS C FIVE UNITS 10 CARS KITCHEN 1 I I �o 20 CARS REQ' FIRST FLOOR STALLS = 19 CARS s �0, 1 SECOND FLOOR STALL = 14 CARS ' 9'-4 1 /2" �9 OFF I C 1=Lj13 EXTRA CARS 40 3 EEI I I t$J 1 WOMEN CONC. SLAB ' � � W/BROOM FINISH ' CONF��ENCE � 22 ro 4" PAINTED LINE'` _--- ---------I---- ------------------- --- ' 3/4 HR RATED -' -RAIL (o — I EXIST. ' N 15LDG. STORAGE @ 3 CARS lu EXILu ST. ` 24'-0" I 3 I I ( 1 10 I/2" 13'-3 I/Z" -- - — L VERIFY OFFICE 9" CONC. CURS I CONFERENCE EC�T,4i�' EXIST. 4 CARS STO = COATS 1 1 - r' -1 Q. 4 CARS STOP?. OFFICEtit f`-¢-6 I ; >C _ ---�'I 4" P INTED LINE r fll ITCHE � iv I I cv I UJALL- OFFIC COPi / OFFICE I OFFICE 3' - 1 1 I SEE ELEV. 42" HIGH RAIL I STO1�. UI<'N�4CE -�- - -- � - -- ------ -- -- \\ ,� P — UP i 1 13'-0" 10'-3" 5'-10 I/2" g'-10 1/2" 9'-4 1/4" ' _--_� R-------_ 19R VERIFY-- - - - - - - - - CONC. WALK DECK ABOVE i i TRANSR I I SEE SHT. A - FOR DETAILS AREA OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1 '188 ± SF w "4p ffl L N JAN 2 8 19gg �Akwo [--0+ LL� 6�1 co QQ091 4 a ' N ul Wco �c O z co cuJ z W C Q W CD ziE O O L LL 4 Q ® ~ CD J4. czo 1 c� d Wx fb0 �W U.2 MV 'Q s ¢' 1 10 -U 24--0 18'- 4" 114 6'- 0 T-0 3/4"11 HIGH RAILING OVER ro I CURB g, GONG. rO WHEEL STOP FOP 2 4--6 • WOMEN .3/4 HR. RATED MEN ;i r7 to ec, 9 47 Hz)c:p SIGN BLDG. STORAGE 4 CARS up 20R ILL- j. -- ---- o.q Q e E C "TC E -,RAaH 6 1 /2� 4' F=4INTED LINE i a \r ` .3 CARS i Ni ro I GONG. CURB DR4, !NA6E :�-ON-,-. 51-45 rA CD 6' CONC. CURB 00 4 C, 18 -o eml A Lu -A 4: 9,_0 2'xCo' WALL 4' FAINTED LINE W1 BRICK VENEER c"I u 0 WAL L - /\42" HIGH RAIL. SEE ELEV. UP qp Vsp 19R DECK ..450v=- 18'- 0" V- 4" 8'- 3" II 2 4'— 0" 18'— 0" TYP. TYP. CATCH BASIN wl OIL / WATER 5EPARATO SEE CIVIL DRU,65. L"'L ' . Lo 2 CARS 411 PAINTED l INE (TYP.) FOR 4TYP.II 1 LAYOUT Jv -1 CARS 6'-0 1/2'1 Li 1 11 ELEV- mEL EQUIP. 5LIDINCH GATE Lu/ MAN DOOR 2 4'— 0" 5 T 0 R -0" STOR s Z. R15ERLo \IV NI RM. ail --14-6 - ----------- 4) ( O.<<4�. �a.�d,�21 5TOR 11 5 CARS 9 sz 7-7-1 5TOR. 120SZ ,/ 1 � i i cr 5 GARS ( i - \—GARAGE VENT FAN LOCATION - 'MTD HIGW ON WALL i �^ 44 FA to 911VI8W bind -V 'I"o Rao blRaN3A >r)jbI9 IM DRAWING NO. SOUND . VIEW CONDOS DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN ENGINEERING SK-1 DRAWN BY JSH 11 "N STREET, SUITE 106 EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 TITLE DRIVEWAY CHECKED BY JSH PHONE J4425) 778-8500 FAX 25) 778-5536 PARTIAL PLAN APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/30/98 FILE NAME: Ski �r �n t b (r15 I ) c, m �'Uo ^�v Zo ra c c Z a -rj rV1 r1 O 1 0 N a\ Y r a � � U H r• cf oS DRAWING NO. SOUNDVIEW CONDOS DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, .WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN ENGINEERING SK-2 DRAWN BY JSH MAIN STREET, SURE t06 TITLE ED 98020 S, WAS25) DRIVEWAY CHECKED BY JSH PHONE 778-8 FAX HE (425) 778-ssae SECTIONS APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/30/98 FILE NAME: SK2 SK, � S9. o II I� I� I;. I.' i, DRAWING NO. SOUNDVIEW CONDOS DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN ENGINEERING SK-3 DRAWN BY JSH >>+ MAIN STREET. SURE 106 EDIIONDS. WASHINGTON 88020 TITLE DRIVEWAY CHECKED BY JSH FAX 425 778-5500 FAx �4xs; 778-5538 EAST ELEVATION--- APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/30/98 FILE NAME: SK3 11 [A 1` r to C 0 911V1rla LIOJ -v tQ 33o n3'13 338 1 —1 2133N3A >0I619 4n llV7D .9x.t _ i� , ealn��•�ra� .9 20 •! )CAI il IJ OIrl �6C ak C u � I I I I mE ON ahm 'JN07 09 DRAWING NO. SOUNDVIEW CONDOS 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SK-1 TITLE DRIVEWAY PARTIAL PLAN DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 SCALE AS SHOWN DRAWN BY JSH CHECKED BY JSH APPROVED BY JSH ENGINEERING "I MAIN STREET, SUITE 108 EOMONOS, WASHINOTON 08020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 PLOT DATE: 12/30/98 FILE NAME: SKI >? j V\ ;W W O O _1 to i Z Al :C ar Y Z O \ \ d\ u 1-� N rN VN O It u 00 i in v �1 G L, 4. C\ i� v r, 2*36 X ; 4 b m o 4.1 t 0 a o HN CA �100 , N% E S DRAWING NO. SOUNDVIEW CONDOS DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN ENGINEERING SK-2 DRAWN BY JSH ED MAIN STREET, TON ,oe TITLE DRIVEWAY PHONE S, 25)WAS778-8 •8020 CHECKED BY JSH FAX NE (425) 778-5536 SECTIONS APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/30/9B nLE NAME: SK2 . 0 c I C �1 L I I: � I C' I.' i, 6°• 2 DRAWING NO. SOUND VIEW CONDOS DATE 12/30/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOYM ENGINEERING SK-3 DRAWN BY JSH > > i MAIN STREET. SUITE 1 2 EDYONDS, WASNINOTON 68020 TITLE DRIVEWAY CHECKED BY JSH FAX NE (425) 778 5538 EAST ELEVATION APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/30/98 FILE NAME: SK3 / ®i rl r to � n J � 01 ...� 4 c j 8,1 V13a al0J • -q' 1N8 338 bI Npail 4 -. - 1 -.. - .. - --• %�3'13 338 r a133N3A >01aIA /M t b1 GNr 1 oNro 'DNOD .9 DRAWING NO. OLA GROSET DRIVEIVAY 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SK-1 TITLE PARTIAL PLAN DATE 12/9/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 SCALE AS SHOWN DRAWN BY JSH CHECKED BY JSH APPROVED BY JSH ENGINEERING ... MAIN STREET, SUITE 106 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 PLOT DATE: 12/9/98 FILE NAME: SKI l=ircFz o � • f3LAl 6o.G`t /z v 6o,S 1 1Z" RF7-AW1A)6L SFr NoTF 1 wA« (Typ) l3LD�r -! - / -7 i3LDG C/.O Go 60 Y �v Ay l5x1 sr7A)6- Gi2i�D� Al7-S NC T=S_ l� /2-'F,4f&Vk4.- 0 G 60f?G P1vC� T-O o� /Z",egT,AIN/NC-- Whe-L AvSTf3F,_- J?6 13Y s T c 0 c i`u R A-L pF D. DEC 1 4 1998 PERMIT COUNTEP EXPIRES:11 O,_0o N O W O H W N► 1 I W W=�� F N 3 N N �s Z =Z= W sex - W a '! CO cn oz N \ 00 S N O:J N (_ (_ (_ rn ¢ D -D -.2 o m coz r- m o w o w > w —3 J U Of 0 O CL ¢ ¢ � w 0_ V) U Q 0 N >- Go Q W � a w 3 > N. cc z o 0 W W O Z OC w C'3 a Q � J M O O w r F- T �aI o s/ Z �L i COz z 0 U W N Q Of 0 z L KOO - m Z ® -� m60.6 N CIO I i X �w o rM� � � y DRAWING NO. OLA GROSET DRIVEWAY DATE 12/9/98 C PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN ENGINEERING SK 111 VAIN STREET, SUITE 106 TITLE DRAWN BY JSH EDMONDS, WASNINGTON 98020 CHECKED BY JSH FAX PHONE (425) 779- (425) 778-5553636 EAST ELEVATION APPROVED BY JSH Il. IZ/7/tlo FILL IVAIVIL: ZAJ i F 911V'134 bi0j m c:cc c f) L f5 • -V' l/fB 336 � ND�Lt • i i DRAWING'NO. OLA GROSET DRIVEWAY DATE 12/9/98 PROJECT NO. 98118.20 110 - .3RD AVE. N. EDMON DS, WA 98020 SCALE AS SHOWN SK-1 TITLE DRAWN BY JSH CHECKED BY JSH PARTIAL PLAN APPROVED BY, JSH PLOT DATE: 12/9/98 FILE NAME: SKI �313 338 --1"7m ?J33N3A >owia 4n 11trtD . 9x. L ENGINEERING ... MAIN STREET, SUITE 106 EDMONDS• WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 r .—j G ail � m fit 1� w,JD x 5 o, z tom' �w t4 6 a cn 44 o� 0 I I I� I . L 1 6 0.6 is DRAWING N0. OLA GROSET DRIVEWAY DATE 12/9/98 110 - 3RD AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 08020 PROJECT N0. 981 18.20 SCALE AS SHOWN SK-3 TITLE DRAWN BY JSH CHECKED BY JSH EAST ELEVATION APPROVED BY JSH PLOT DATE: 12/9/98 FILE NAME: SK3 -. - C � ENGINEERING 111 MAIN STREET, SUITE 106 EOMONDS, W(SHINOTON 98020 PHONE (425 778-8500 FAX (425; 778-5536 01 EXCAVATION SHORING .GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES CODE: ALL CONSTRUCTION. SHALL. CONFORM WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC) 1994 EDITION. DESIGN LOADING: ASSUMED SOIL CHARACTERISTICS: "K 105 pcf 0 = 30' C -- 0 CONCRETE USE 1-1/2 SACKS OF CEMENT PER CUBIC YARD OF CONCRETE. NO SPECIAL INSPECTION , REQUIRED. MAXIMUM SIZED AGGREGATE IS 3/4" . MAXIMUM SLUMP IS 6'. ALL CONCRETE CREFJ .,1N, FILES SMALL BE POURED IN A . MONOLITHIC POUR UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. STRUCTURAL- STEEL:. STRUCTURAL STEEL, SHALL BE ASTM A-36 Fy =36,000 PSI OR A572 GRADE 50, Fy-=50,000 PSL FABRICATION AND .ERECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE I FINAL GRADELATEST. EDITION OF THE "A.I.S.C.. ' SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF. STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR' BUILDINGS". ALL WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO THE A..W•S. D1".1, LATEST EDITION,`"STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE". WELDING ELECTRODES SHAI L., BE .E'70XX. LOW HYDROGEN ELECTRODES FOR MANUAL SHIELDED METAL -ARC WEL# 13G 0 - 9'UAL ' LE'TRQ" FOR OTHER WELDING PROCESSES.WELDED JOINTS SHALL. CONFORM. TO A,W.S. "-PREQUALIFIED JOINT DETAILS FOR WELDED CONSTRUCTION. SHOT' DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT i FOR REVIEW .PRIOR TO FABRICATION. ALL WELDING SHALL 8E PERFORMED BY W.A.B.O. CERTIFIED `WELDERS., "CORROSION PROTECTION- PROTECTION: < 7 „I THE' STEEL PILES ARE"TO BE COATED WITH AN EPDXY ENAMEL SUCH AS SHERWIN WILLIAMS II HI= -MIL SHEAR -TAR.© 111 , ii i If FRAMING LUMBER: �. DIMENSIONAL LUMBER JiF #2 OR BETTER _ ALL GRADES SHALL CONFORM TO "WWPA GRADING RULES FOR. WESTERN LUMBER"., LATEST: °~'- EDITION. ALL WOOD IN. C6NTACT WITH SOIL OR CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE -TREATED. o z RECOMMENDED. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. DRILL HOLES FOR PILES. HOLES MAY BE DRILLED WITHOUT CASING PROVIDED SOIL DOES ,,NQT CAVE INTO HOLE. 2. INSTALL: ALL SOLDIER, PILES BEFORE COMMENCING WITH EXCAVATION. PILE SIZES AND LOCATIONS PER THIS PLAN. 3. POUR CONCRETE. IF WATER IS PRESENT IN THE HOLE DURING POURING, CONCRETE MUST BE TREMIED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE. 4. CONCRETE IS TO REACH' FULL STRENGTH BEFORE COMMENCING WITH EXCAVATION. 5. AS EXCAVATION PROCEEDS DOWNWARD, REMOVE CONCRETE AND LAG BETWEEN THE PILES WITH FRAMING. LUMBER OF SIZE PER PLAN. VOIDS BEHIND THE LAGGING ARE II I TO BE: FILLED WITH PEA GRAVEL. I I II 6. THE EXCAVATED SITE •IS TO BE KEPT FREE OF WATER BY DRAINS AND/OR PUMPING. CONSTRUCT ABERM OR DRAINS TO DIVERT SURFACE WATER FROM RUNNING INTO I F THE EXCAVATED SITE. n " 7. THE SHORING WALLS ARE ` TO BE MONITORED AND SUPERVISED BY LICENSED GEOTECH ' z n EXCAVATION UNTIL THE COMPLETE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLED. MOVEMENT IS TO' "BE " CHECKED BY SURVEY AGAINST ESTABLISHED BENCHMARKS. THE ENTIRE 'PROPOSED > SYSTEM FOR MONITORJNG MOVEMENT IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE �1 ARCHITECT :FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, SUBMIT COPIES OF I REQUIRED FIELD REPORTS' TO BLDG OFFICIAL. uj I, II S. PREPARE SUBGRADE AND CONSTRUCT CONCRETE FOOTINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH x THE .STRUCTURAL PLANS:. `� I 'I 9. CONSTRUCT: GONCRE'I E WALLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH "STRUCTURAL PLANS: 10, PREPARE' SUBGRADE AND CONSTRUCT SLAB IN ACCORDANCE WITH STRUCTURAL PLANS. MISCELLANEOUS: THE CONTRACTOR. SHALL. "VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ALL CONDITIONS AT JOB SITE INCLUDING BUILDING` ANIJ ' SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE: COMMENCING WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. ALL( DISCREPANCIES SHALL, BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH . T:HE WORK.: UNLESS EXPRESSLY STIPULATED, NO ADDITIONAL: ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE IN THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR MANUFACTURER'S FAVOR BY. VIRTUE OF ERRORS, I AMBIGUITIES 'AND/OR OMISSIONS ' WHICH SHOULD HAVE 'BEEN DISCOVERED DURING THE PREPARATION OF BID ESTIMATE AND DIRECTED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT, IN PILE VETAIL - A TIMELY MANNER. ANY ERRORS, AMBIGUITIES AND/OR OMISSIONS IN THE DRAWINGS OR SCALE- RTA SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING. NO WORK "IS TO BE STARTED BEFORE CORRECTION IS MADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACINGS AS REQUIRED UNTIL ALL PERMANENT CONNECTIONS AND STIFFENINGS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR ALL BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE ONLY: WRITTEN DIMENSIONS. THE DETAILS SHOWN ARE TYPICAL AND SHALL BE USED FOR LIKE OR SIMILAR CONDITIONS NOT SHOWN. VARIATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO WORK SHOWN ON, THESE DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE CARRIED OUT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ARCHITECT. THIS DRAWINGIS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY. OF THE ARCHITECT AND CAN BE REPRODUCED ONLY WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT, IN WHICH CASE THE REPRODUCTION MUST BEAR THEIR NAMES AS ARCHITECT. INSPECTIONS: INSPECTIONS BY AN APPROVED•WABO CERTIFIED TESTING LAB FOR CONCRETE PLACEMENT AND. PILE PLACEMENT APPROVED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL. VERIFY f CONC. FILLED PILE (FOP SIZE 4 LOCATION SEE DET. B) L4551 3 STEEL BEAM BOT, OF PERIMETER WALL FT62. 4'41 DRAIN TILE 18 SPACES ® 6' 1 -1/3" O/C = 1 10'0" FILING PLAN 19,'0 CONC. PILE 3'x LA64SINCs --PILE ------- 4 3x2x '% FOR FULL DEPTH OF LAGGING WlOx49 FILE DETAIL5 i .. � y „y LJ CONIC. TO REMAIN CONC. TO REMAIN W 1Q> x 49 EXCEPT t+ DRAIN OUTSIDE CONC. WALL PER PLANS OUTSIDE FACE ------ __--_------ 16'm CONE. PILE OF WALL - -- - —�_ -= - - - - --- (TYPJ , 3 � - I I MIRADRAIN - •M i CONCRETE WALL REMOVE, FLAN5%E, A5 SHOWN, FULL WT. OF CORNER BEAMS PER PROJECT PLANS (TYP. 3 CORNERS) - - REINF. PER PLANS CONC. TO BE BROKEN AWAY CONC. TO BE BROKEN AWAY EXCEPT AS NOTED \ W 10 x 49 -`-" SGAL.Ir= t�k.TB. I 67'Xsil OVERFLOW j EL= 54.00 PIPE SUPPORTS (2MIN.) 3" X 0.090" ALUMINUM W/ 518" STAINLESS BOLTS - 2.30' OUTLET 6 IE= 49.85 } NOTE: ALL STEI-L PARTS AND 2' Min. SURFACES MUST BE GALVANIZED AND ASPHALT COATED (TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER). COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED. RESTRI CTOR PLATE WITH 1.18" DIA. ORIFICE CUT IN FLATE, MACHINE DRILLED, SHARP .-DGED ORIFICE. RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH 1.22" DIA. ORIFICE CUT 1N PLATE, MACHINE DRILLED, SHARP EDGED ORIFICE. ROUND .SOLID LOCKING LID ADJUST FRAME AND GRATE SUCH THAT RESTRICTOR/ POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER STEPS. < a a e + LIFT ., .. HANDLE e 4' 04, J a , a• 48' 30" __ 0.5Z \- FROP - [I SHEAR GATE A- SEE DETAIL ,a A- 2' Min. - a- 2' Min. a 48" TYPE I I,l SECTION "A -A" STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM PROFILE IE -45.95 @ CONNECTION w/ SEWER �CLEANOUT EXIST SEWER CITY ENGINEER; OVVERLAYNASERE:QUIRED. 6' ALLEY S 29'08'27" W - 120.00' x 00 1 i ; INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG x USE D.I. PIPE 60' % 22.5' NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO CLEANOUT z o / 00 x . OIL/WATER � - SEPARATOR = w ... GE-...49.50 cc)1..............._L......... o ....... 5 0' CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. ARRANGE FOR A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY OF EDMONDS SITE INSPECTION, (206)771 -0220. 2. CALL DIALDIG(UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER;1-800-424-5555. 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES; REFER TO T.E.S.C.P. NOTE BELOW. 4. INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SEWER, STORM DRAINAGE, WATER, POWER, TELEPHONE, ETC. 5. COMPLETE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 6. CLEAN UP STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. i 1 GENERAL NOTES I 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE` WITH W.S.D.O.T./A.P.WfA. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. 2. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPRO) IMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATIONS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. 3. ALL INLET AND CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATES SHALL NOT BE ADJUSTED UNTIL IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PAVING. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON SITE , EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. ALL REQUIRED STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO ANY PAVING UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 6. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NOT ON PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. 7. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH TOUGH, HARDY, FAST GR6ING GRASS UNLESS LANDSCAPPING/EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EMPLOI'ED. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPING 8", 12", 1a;A%24, 36", 48, & 54 INCLUDING DETENTION PIPE WILL BE 16 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL ANp SHALL USE TREATMENT 1. 9. GRASS _ SEEDING WILL BE DONE USING AN APPROVED TYPE HYDRO -SEEDER, OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. , THE PERFORMANCE BOND WILL NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL THE GRASS IS ESTABLISHED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 0 10. PIPING SPECIFICATIONS AS NOTED. 11. ALL STEEL PARTS WILL BE GALVANIZED AND WITH :TREATMENT #1(ASPHALT COATED). 12. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER, WATER, AND UNDERGROUND POWER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD SFECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.; O.D. STANDARDS. INSTALL 2 - 8" x 5.5' BOLLARDS AT 2 CORNERS POWER VAULT EXIST LAMPHOLE PROP POWER VAULT CB 1 , TYPE 1 -L G 60.40 IE 50.01 2' 24" CMP @ 0.5% 5'(center tank to bldg) 28' 48" CMP @ 0.5% 2' 30" CMP @ 0.5% __--CB�2 48" TYPE 2, W/6" RISER o G �6.64 OE 54.00 c; IE 49.85 81.75' 6" PVC @ 2.16% 01 _..................................................................................._ CLAIRE'S HIGH ;POINT z PANTRY ELEV,50.30,.Lij t ROCK x { .................. CONSTRUCTION 54'............ _..... .. ENTRANCE t 1 �.2................... CB#3, TYPE Z E x _ .......... G IE ;48.08EXIST. P.P. g 9P N 29-08'27" E - 120�g 5� 2 EXIST WM 4980 �oc`� ' s 1 EXIST STORM SEWER ¢9 g l I I 9 30 O O NEW C�RIVEWAY. EXIST WATER MAIN 20 8" CMP @ 2.12% EXIST CB APPROACH EXIST SIGN NO 3rd AVENUE P'��. PARKING SIDEWALK, CURB, & GUTTER TO LOADING BE INSPECTED BY CITY ENGINEER; ZONE INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG BACK OF REPLACE AS REQUIRED. PROPOSED PARKING SIDEWALK AFTER REMOVAL OF EXIST. STRIPE, 8.5' FROM CI.IRB EXIST. YELLOW ZONE RETAINING WALL. 1 5' 1 PAINT YELLOW 11 O' I "NO LOADING" -'�I-I Ac cunwnl s-�1 58' , - IL- - -- HARD SJRFACE ROAD 10' R � 0 cn 0 o ®` 4"-6" QUARRY Z _f1 SPALLS U✓ i O =� 12" MIN DEPTH of _ 22' -� MIN 1, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N. T. S. I 0 I I I I I I I I I I' I�I K=Sri -- I I I I I 1 �EDW ---------I -f I I I I I I I I i I I I I 20 0 20 40 VICINITY MAP NOTE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATICN of EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMP'S, INCLUDIkG BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PL4STIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMP'S SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOIL STALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL , REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 TO THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINUOUS ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE. WIRE MESH SUPPORT FI-NCE -FOR SLIT FILM FABRICS. WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE FOR SLIT FILM FABRICS -\ 0 I FILTER FABRIC ATERIA M CN I I o� /, �� ,; PROVIDE WASHED GRAVEL-� �n BACKFILL OR COMPACTED I I BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL I I NATIVE SOIL AS DIRECTED IN 8 BY 12 TRENCH �- _ -I _ BY ENGINEER 6' MAX. I I BURY BOTTOM OF Ir (I FILTER MATERIAL IN 2" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, •8" BY 12" TRENCH U STANDARD OR BET -TER' �� OR EQUIVALENT 2_" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, ,STANDARD OR BETTER OR EQUIVALENT ELEVATION SILT FENCE. DETAIL N. T. S. I SECTION sv� _ 7 1997 � R � couwlEIR O U LJ \(1 s IA, OA, ry l , I Lv 0)3: n* c: LLJ • C) -0 U) � n cn W � .- C Q Z Z J <C rill In Ld :2Q �_ I- V) im I lcIwo m m Z a ¢ ¢ 5 0 0 x Q N o J n z mw z Q Z 0 U) 0 N z 0 00 Ld D Z Lli VI Z t� 0 � CO �-- Q (n J z �_ ¢ N o N v w w N II H 5/6" TYPE "X" GsYP'BD 0 BOTTOM OF TRUSSES ECT TILE CEILM * 16" o% w/ 'PE "x" GxYP'BD >IDE IWG IF REQ'D LINE TYP. WALL 5ECTION 5CALE: 3/4" = IV' REFLECTED GLCs. PLAN 50ALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" TACsE 5 C C l I I I I -- - --- - - 36 " 14ICs4-I RAIL INGs OVER 6" CURB I 6" CONC. CURB _ WHEEL STOP I SEE 5HT. A- il I I I I I FOR STAIR DET, I I I - II(i RECUYP 20R tilt O.N. DOOR 3/4 HR. RATEDABLE 5 CARS MD1�ITIONS IA OFFIC OFAX / O:F fri ICE I HDCP SfCxN I PAWING ' OFFICE FIRST FLOOR = 3051SF - 4 CARS OFFICE 2 ND FLOOR = 0-12 SF - 6 CARS . ' KITCHEN CONDOS ( FIVE UNITS) 10 CARS = 20 CARS REQ'D FIRST FLOOR STALLS !3 CARS SECOND FLOOR STALL = 14 CARS I ' 9'-4 1/2" � OFF I C 13 EXTRA CARS 3 E . WOMEN Lo�r I CONC. SLAB �III '� ' • '=N-- ' - - (IIIII 3' �4= -63.-' 5'-E��-_�-X" IS_= " _ 3 II 3' 2'- I4CI' -OII/"ATS EXIS " N�i w/BROOM FINISH CONFFRENCE0 4- " FAINTED ' -LINE - ----- RAfL 3/4 HRRATED4J T. BLOG. STORAGE 3 CARS T. 24'-0" I-7' Im 1/213'-: 1/2VERIFY � 6CONC. CURB EXIST. CON ERENCE ECRETAIR 31 4 CARS STO 4 CARS 5T0 OFFIC INtED LINE4" P ITC-E WALL - — - - --- ------ - --- {\ �---- i �., OFFIC COPY /I OFFICE I OFFICE 3' -- N SEE ELEv. 17� O2HIGH RAIL STU�N4E2Lr,===j I I �\ ZL P UP 13'-0" 10'-3" 9'-I0 1/2' 9'-10 1/2"V 9'-4 1/4" �� t R I taR VERIFY "I/ ' -- --------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- CONC. WALK DECK ABOVE i i tR4N R I I 1 L---------------- 4-� I SEE SHT. A - FOR DETAILS AREA OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT � 1788± 5F 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" 40" J-4(A 2`7�`l�' vow 4, Nc1 L-o� LGt ybtti� N lu N Z d W <i W W zl- tA Lo o0 U L .� U.4fi J Z� ca d W tO V✓ -W UZ L uru TYPE "X" GYP'SD 6 BOTTOM OF TRUSSES ►CT TILE CEILING is 16" o% w/ PE "x" GYP'BD TIDE ING IF REQ'D -INE I Yf=>. WALL 6E CT I ON SCALE: 3/4" =1'0" REFLECTED CLCs. PLAN SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" I I I I I I — I - 36" HIGH RAILING OVER 6" CURB U 44EEL STOP 71 I I I � <V — I I E I � JS 5 CARS COPY ===ram FAX SUPPLY HDCP SIGN KITCHEN , oe I I 9'-4 1 /2" I I WOMEN L CONF RENCE J 2-5 2 22 -- ----------I- ------------------- --- ' RAIL O 3/4 HR RATED I I ExlSt I I I , I , I I I 6" CONC. CURB I I SEE SHT. A - FOR STAIR DET. I I I i UP I -A-M H H — ---- 20R I. I i I \l I O.H. DOOR 3/4 HR. RATED I I I - - --- - - - RECY LK T SN - -- - -- - - I I PARKING I I OFFICE FIRST FLOOR = 30515F = 4 CARS OFFICE 2 NO FLOOR = �0-72 SF = 6 CARS CONDOS ( FIVE UNITS > 10 CARS 1 i I 20 CARS REQ'D ro FIRST FLOOR STALLS = 119 CARS SECOND FLOOR STALL = 14 CARS 13 EXTRA CARS I , I � � I � I , CONC. SLAB w/BROOM FINISH 0 ' ,J) 4" PAINTED LINE I 3 i N BLDG. STORAGE -1 3 CARS r iXU EXIST. 24'-0"- 3' - - I I ----- -- -- — = 1�'PO I/2" 13'-3I/2"- VERIFYOFFICECONC. rE CURSEXIST.CONRENC 17',4P MEN , 7;:E 6,4 COATS 14 CARSO I ' � F1L ® 0 0 ' 4 CARS I I TALE j cV _ I 3 �+ TOR. `� `� _ i � r I � 4'-6" I6 i 4" PAINTED LINE _ I I 3' I � N \ OFFIC COPY /i OFFICE I STOR. N I I I I I .71 I0'-3" 9'-10 112" 1 nn I i I 0) I , I � I OFFICE _ WALL- LURNACE 42" HIGH RAIL I SEE ELEV. I I ---� I I I I / I P UP � 9'-10 1/2" 9'-4 1/4" �� t R I 19R I VERIFY w•,`� DECK A50VE--/ TRANSf R i ------- ----------� ---- SEE SHT. A - FOR DETAILS AREA OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1188f SF 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/8" =1 gym° JAN 2 8 RE= 56.64 OVERFLOW I EL= 54.00 PIPE SUPPORTS (2MIN.) 3" X 0.090" ALUMINUM W/ 518" STAINLESS BOLTS - 2. 30' -1_ OUTLET 6" IE= 49.85 NOTE: ALL STEi.L PARTS AND 2' Min. SURFACES MUS i BE GALVANIZED AND ASPHALT COATED (TREATMENT 1 0 R BETTE R). . COM PLETE MPLET ) E 1 CORROSION PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED. RESTRICTOR PLA 1 E WITH 1.18" DIA. ORIFICE CUT IN F LATE, MACHINE DRILLED, SHARP .=DGED ORIFICE. RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH 1.22" DIA. ORIFICE CUT IN PLATE, MACHINE DRILLED, SHARP EDGED ORIFICE. ROUND SOLID LOCKING LID T ADJUST FRAME AND GRATE SUCH THAT RESTRICTOR/ I POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER STEPS. ° n v LIFT J r HANDLE e- I° 0 4' M' J a- - a 48" 2 4" 30" 0.57 FRCP - T SHEAR GATE SEE DETAIL R- °a a: 2' Min. 48" TYP E LF � 81.75' 6" PVC © 2.16% I -ELEV. 50.0 SECTION "A -A" STORM DRAINAGE DETENT";JN SYSTEM PROFILE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. ARRANGE FOR A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY OF EDMONDS SITE INSPECTION, (206)771 -0220. 2. CALL DIALDIG(UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER)1-8QO-424-5555. 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES; REFER TO T.E.S.C.P. DOTE BELOW. 4. INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SEWER, STORM DRAINAGE, WATER, POWER, TELEPHONE, ETC. I. 5. COMPLETE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 6. CLEAN UP STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T./A.P.W.A. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY :OF EDMONDS. 2. A ARE LOCA TIONS OF EXI STING UTIL ITIES SHOWN AR. f APPR OXIMATE ATE AN D IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATIONS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. 3. ALL INLET AND CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATES. SHALL NOT BE ADJUSTED UNTIL IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PAVING. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITY SHALL BE'"CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST. BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. ALL REQUIRED STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO ANY PAVING UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 6. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NOT ON PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHALL HAVE iLOCKING LIDS. 1, 1 7. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH TOUGH, HARDY, FAST ,GROWING GRASS UNLESS LANDSCAPPING/EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EMPLOYED. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPING 8", 12", 18, 124, 36", 48, & 54 INCLUDING DETENTION PIPE WILL BE 16 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL AND SHALL USE TREATMENT 1. i 9. GRASS SEEDING WILL BE DONE USING AN APPROVED TYPE HYDRO -SEEDER, OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS., THE PERFORMANCE BOND WILL NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL THE GRASS IS ESTABLISHED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 10. PIPING SPECIFICATIONS AS NOTED. 11. ALL STEEL PARTS WILL BE GALVANIZED AND WITH TREATMENT # 1 ASPHALT ,COATED). 12. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER, WATER, AND UNDERGROUND POWER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.l.,l,P.- 'STANDARDS. R IE -45.95 @ CONNECTION w/ SEWER TCLEANOUT EXIST SEWER INSTALL 2 - 8" x 5.5' BOLLARDS ALLEY SURFACE TO BE INSPECTED BY AT 2 CORNERS POWER VAULT CITY ENGINEER; OVERLAY AS RI:-QUIRED. 1 6' ALLEY �- EXIST • -� L111VIPHVLE S 29'08'27" W - 120.00' PROP POWER VAULT - GEE 60.40 ' IE 50.01 Co 8.5; 2' 24" CMP @ 0.5% INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG x USE D.I. PIPE 60' i 5'(center tank to bldg) NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO CLEANOUT 22.5� - �.-� � �' �� 28' 48" CMP @ 0.5 I- o ................ • , , Z o /' y 25 SA <................ P�..Lo ; x OIL/WATER M > 60' N SEPARATOR = Ld 2' 30" CMP @ 0.5% GE_..49.60 o 0 0 , o, `- CB#2 48" TYPE 2, W/6" RISER o GE �6.64 Lu HIGH POINT OE 54 00 ELEV 50.00 ................. . rnx d- (� N IE 49.85 81.75' 6" PVC @ 2.16% 3- ........ HIGH :POINT _ ........... •coo CLAIRE'S ELEV 50.30 •. Z PANTRY ROCK �...,. CONSTRUCTION : t; = W R%'L. .... ENTRANCE ............................................... 54 F- ..r .. 1 ..................... ...... . TYPE z G 49.10 IE 48.08 Q EXIST. P.P. 9!P N 29'OS'27 E - 120'- 9� 2 EXIST WIM 8 c k9RI I 93 q �- 9 ° L- �° 0 -~� EXIST STORM SEWER NEW DRIVEWAY 20 8" CMP @ 2.12% EXIST CB J EXIST WATER MAIN APPROACH EXIST SIGN NO 3rd AVENUE NPARKING , SIDEWALK, CURB, & GUTTER TO " LOADING BE INSPECTED BY CITY ENGINEER; ZONE INSTALL FILTERFENCE ALONG BACK OF REPLACE AS REQUIRED. PROPOSED PARKING SIDEWALK AFTER REMOVAL OF EXIST. - 15'1 PAINT YELLOW 1 D' STRIPE, 8.5' FROM CUR'_1 EXIST. YELLOW ZONE RETAINING WALL. AS SHOWN "NO LOADING" ............... , IT _ C/L_ - HARD SURFACE ROAD 1 � T � o 10 R OI, UI O O T- 4"-6" QUARRY Z TT SPALLS 12" MIN DEPTH _ o -� MIN 4 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE h. N. T. S. i�e G JaMa 4 ✓A1 A pied ie G pr'S dGweviK- I ns�tc��0 1 I aK w 1 ,4 G° V.4/ J I I sO�fRgs I I I I 14N� I I I I puc Y ,� -j _MLN O I Lll K I - --SONSET BEAI;R-=d ; -_v r SITE PARK �ir,.QC S ERS 1 WLTNER SAYER L .I A � KINL�ST�N - - -- FE AP 1 EDMONI; v,P Q 21 CARS A+ �� VVV i1ND pAme R �h PARK J 1 Q = I �20 < Al) * P I I 1 rrlo K 7 SilPK �• J -t-------- - r DURBIN P I MARINA ewLn[R > U) Q�.vrN tro 'Illy I ` LD fla j qj• I WILI)LIFE 10A a N i "AVC�UARY HOwECi : WY „s, sR' V I I µUN HEML ML 5 I OR FkA� ONT UR 1 �fOWARDS _- 1, TH T :PARK' U' ,p 1 PT DW_A_R_D 23 c SW = d- > > L 3:O PL FI SI 1' a - _ RBELU I A ELM, s - M = � I 1=j I IPL MB > ECM I pt 1 lip X1. 61° e Q,p i BIR 1 I 1 w - __ -. _. .. . _ - J_ _ __ 1 •t) ALG41'id.�l(r I' H ohG• . T. O a 2 TN T'_ R`t it 1 SEE CS ;�:L7D".;,_ iE :8 IH rL > FRIAR TUCK LN o1EE�'•PARK ?IE5Ei1. 2 sw 1 a Z ' I 2 $ ALAN.A DALE FL •1 7 LITTLE JOHN CT R 731 T "• 1 '�'' a'� Q BI I 2 I WODDN NOTE I c1;HIS �I THNOTH'HAM HD g ' 771WOO[NIAVEN STP W R S3 20 .40 VICINITY MAP v, ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZ/'TION of EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMP'S, INCLII DING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMP'S SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 TO THROUGH- APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINUOUS ROL:`S. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FAE RI(; TO WIRE. TWIRE MESH SUPPORT =F_-NCE FOR SLIT FILM FABRIC:. WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE FOR SLIT FILM FABRICS - \ FIL TER MATERIAABRIC N un ` `i'' �'� % % i� i� �� i� % �. �� ,�� /• �� ail HED GRAVEL PROVIDE WAS BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL BACKFILL OR COMPACTED IN 8" BY 12" TRENCH I NATIVE SOIL AS DIRECTED N--4I--------may---I�- BY ENGINEER 6' MAX. I I BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN u' 2" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, 8" BY 12" TRENCH STANDARD OR BETTER I 1 OR EQUIVALENT 2" BY 2" WOOD POSTS, STANDARD OR BETTER ELEVATION OR EQUIVALENT 1. 1 0 8" :MIN. SECTION N I Ln 9TN P1 il 9 ,ow,j 0 A- S oEVF40PU- ap ED p hS QTR co'k pb\-X� 4A, Is TYPE "x" GYIOIE50 tp BOTTOM OF: TRUSSES TYP. WALL 5EC7I0N SCALE: 3/4'Y'0" REFLECTED GLG. PLAN SCALE- 1AW = I'-011 ACT TILE CEILING 0 Iro" o/c W/ "PE "x" GYP'Bo WDE ING IF REQ'r-> -INE 1. 3-TUBE JR. FIXTURE TALE - FIL.4 AA TOR, OFFIC� 4'- OFFICE COPY /I O=FICE' OFFICE STOR. 10'-3" 1 e-10 112" 91-10 1121, ...... ...... AREA OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1130± 5F �o�� 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: SEE SHT. A - FOR STAIR DET. O.H. DOOR 3/4 WFP_ RATED SCY L H f ; SF = 4 CARS ( , 2 SF a 6 CARS 10 CARS 20 CARS.REOV (Z ARS 4 CARS =XTRA CARS ' i It PAINTED Lltg 3 CARSN, NC. CURB__ I .� _ f I 4 CARS f' 1 WALL f� f SEE ELEV. (0 ) UP 19R TRANS R .......... -,SEE 514T. A- F'OR DETAILS �u WINDOW SCHEDULE NO./LOCATION MANUfACT, tTYPEE AIR SPACE MODEL L `U°VALUE �FT2� SIZE KAWNEER ALUM 1/2" TRIFAB« .65 345.24 (4)12'-4 x 7'_0 KAWNEER ALUM 1/2" TRIFAB .65 252.24 (1)12'-0 x 21'-1 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 384.0 (16)6'-0 x-4'-0 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERES .65 417.78 (4)16'-6 x 6'-4 MILGUARD -ALUM 1/2" SER0,fS _65— 86.63 (3)16'-6 x 1'-9 ,( MILGUARD ALUM 1/2 SERIES .65 76.15 (1)12'_2 x W-4 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" 1100 _65 21.05 (1)12'-2 x 1'-9 ® MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" 110ES .65 56..04 (1)12'-0 x 4'-8 Q MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" SERIES .65 336.24 (12)6'-0 x 4'-8 MILGUARD ALUM 1/2" S10IES .65 18.68 (1)4'-0 x 4'-`8 TOTAL: 1994.05 TOTAL GLAZING AREA: 1994.05 @ ~ ~ -� — TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA 9,473.4 ACTUAL GLAZING AREA PERCENTAGE .. (LINE A DIVIDED, BY LINE 8 X 100) (ALLOWED 10.24% 0 MAXIMUM GLARING AREA PERCENTAGE (ocll k orm AY CompuANC€ Op.TION): OPTION #1 i 2� RETAIL & OFFICE DOOR SCHEDULE OPENING DOOR FRAME tj- 0 REMARKS N©. SIZE TYPE MAT. FIN. MAT. FIN. 1 3' X -I' C AL FF I AL FF 3' X -I' C AL FF AL FF 3 5' _C AL. FF AL FF --- -- - 3' X "I, C AL FF AL FF 3' X '1' C AL FF AL Ff 3 X C6g D W© NAT WD NAT �•', 26X 6p B WD NAT WD NAT 26 X FOP B UJD NAT WD NA 3 X 68 B WD NA WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 14 3 X e B wD NA WD NAT 20. MIN. RATED 11 2b X e$, B wo NAI WD NAT 12 26 X � B WD NA . WD NA C AL FT- AL Fr- 20 MIN. RATED 14 15 3 X 3 .X 1 B C , wD AL NA F:F WD AL NAT FF 20 MIN. RATED 20 MIN. RATED 3 X 6e B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 17 3 X 6P B UJD NAT WO NAT 1-HR RATED 18 3 X ' 53 WD NAT WD NAT I-HR RATED 19 3 X 6� 8 UJD NAT WD NAT 1-HR RATED Q 3 X ep 5 WD N.Al ,WD NAT 1�.HR,RATED 21 3 X 6$ D WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 3 X �' D WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 3 3 X �8 D wD NAT wD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 24 3 X fag B wD NAT]WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 25 3 X �8 B WD NA WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 26 3' X -1- C AL FF I AL FF 20 MIN. RATED @ 3 X 68 B WD NAT WD NAT 20 MIN. RATED 28 3' X 7' C AL FF AL FF 20 MIN. RATED 29 3' X "I' A HM P HM P ' 1-HR RATED 3' X 1 1 A LEE HM P 1- HR RATED DOOR DOOR DOOR POOR (c) (D) (B) 1 18'-0" I I 1 II ! 8'-323'- 10 1/4" II 24'- 4' I 18'- 3" { 24'-0" f 18'- _ 4" ! I I _ I I I ' - LINE OF OFFICE ABdVE 0 ! I 1 24'-0" i� 1 8 _C�• �� I ! !_ I I I U-) i TYP. I� TYP..T I I I _ 1 j i I j II _ CATCH 5A51N W/ WATER SEOL ARATO SEE CIVIL DRUMS.00 TYP. BOMANITE" 5TA-lPED CON+ETE 1 / sr 10'-0" I 8'-9 1/2" 2' X 2' PATTERN 1 ! ! (Z � a �� 1 I ' 9 COLOR AS SELECTED s 2 CARS co �' 4" PAINTED L±I t � YPJ � I (.A7 SEE SHT. A& FOR TYP- TOILET ROOM LAYOUT` TYP. I I ; - I - ----- - . / If ' 1 i RETAIL I d 1 001 ' 5EE SHT A3- I12� =OR STAIR DETAILS ELEV. , It 1/8"'- IEL I EQUIP. O - -- - - j 16' SL IDING GATEi I I A I I I UPCD -11 N I In I 0'-0" 19R 1 - . -._ ' I R1 EAR �_L e 1-9 � 3,_0,.- I ; " 1 -2 zs 32 1 H I SEE SHT. A-1 FOR DETAILS I M I� ii 0 I I � I I I -i'_2 23/32" 3'-0" IRE TA I L `1 -- ---- - -- - ----- — -+ - 1501 _ 5F 9 3/4" 1 CV c0 1 I I i Ln I 76 N w II � I N � I { I I _ I 9 3/4" II i I 3' - p„ +i— STEEL TUBE GATE STOP, ! 5'-O" tm �I I _.... 1 STOR. � I M I STOR. co j FLAT SLOPE CONC. LU,4LK `�' UP / 2'-0" z 1_!_.l L m 1 5 CARS W/ P"fAN DOOR GARAGE VENT FAN LOCATION - MTD HIGH ON WALL Ag4l14 1,st FLOOR FLAN SCALE: 1/8" =1'm" 10 ZZ. CA95 k is ... i � Sk R Me 1•J. � � 5 1 EEL 6TAIR SECTION $CALE: I/4 110' USE TYPE 'C' BALUSTERS ON OUTER RAIL OF LANDING 41 z d) 1N TYPE 'A' BALUSTER -- �6TE�EL �-STA�IRIO�LAN� hx1 5ALU5TER IDTA I L SCALE: I' =110' 5CALE:1/4' z 1'0' 3/4' STEEL ROD 3'x1/4' FLAT BAR I N , I I 1 ,L 15ALUFER. DETAIL SCALE: I' _ I10' X UP 19R TOAD DETAIL SCALE:1'40' STEEL. CHANNEL STRINGER TYP. NOTE: USE TYPE 'A' BALUSTERS ON INNER HANDRAIL WHERE SPACE ALLOWS, OTHERWISE USE TYPE '8' ,'.. """,-.L PIPE BALU6TER DETAIL 5CALE:1' = I'O' 11/2 I' STEEL PIPE 2'x1/4' FLAT BAR L V I Oj I I I 00i 1 I 1 3'-1' of i : I I I � I� l r, j I V I I I i I I I -01 I I ' 2'-10 1/2" I I i I i I -oi o I, I i 3'-9 1 j 2" II �i Ic 1 I j � L I I i \'! 1 j I j � I I (� I 1 I i I I j .O LD I 1 I tD i FOR DETAILS N.Y -6 -0'- - a _ " -- - 4�---0 * 61-6' _ 24'-10 1 /4" -- �3 —0 ' 2' 25'-7*' 11 1 /2 6'-0'� 4'-06'--Q�� 8 1 18'-0" 2nd FLOOR PLAN 5CALE: 1/8' =1'O' R. 4TE'D