No preview available
17905 VISTA DEL MAR DR_Redacted11111111111111 13578 17905 VISTA DEL MAR DR � P-UBLIC_ ORK3 QEFT CITY OF EDMONDS EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT Lu Q SUSPENSE DATE: w O r r MAYOR As We Discussed MAYOR'S ADMIN. SS'T. Investigate 7� BUILDING OFFICIAL `� / and report Take Appropriate \\ CHIEF of POLICE Action CITY CLERK Prepare Letter/Memo for: CITY ENGINEER My Signature Mayor's Signature � CITY PLANNER Previously Ref'd FINANCE DIRECTOR Status of Action? For Your Information Return to: FIRE CHIEF PARKS & REC. DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CO ENT r V FROM: ATE: / (8/76) e, �' 51 Zt" t�-U �- V �`` al�� l 1- i M&MIT YOMOP In OV&P SATURDoAY, APML 20 ❑ . Latex (water based) paints g Q� o p� El Oil based paints . . ` ❑ Paint thinners_and brush cleaners_ Mariner High School parking lot ❑ Stains 200-120th SW, Everett 0 Paint strippers ❑ Wood preservatives - , .112th St MARINER You can,Take' (fte �a SCHOOL � 120th ❑ Latex paints = ❑ Oil based paints 99 9 4t ❑ Stains - sth st' sue_ Open to community groups & the public (no business waste -accepted) M Have Hazardous Waste? .:: come to the HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ROUNDUP May 5 at these locations: ❑ Everett Reservoir- 6001 Evergreen Way, Everett D Arlington Airport - 188thSt NEl47th Av NE, Arlington o Monroe Fairgrounds Hwy: 2 & 1.79th, Monroe -❑ Edmonds Community College-- 20000-68th Av W, Lynn A public service of Snohomish Count Dept. of Public Works Solid Waste Management Division ❑ Information: 259-1834 P Y P 9 Printed on recycled paper, ##P20 loc. 10" City. of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to. h 1 C" 1 Ar Date Received: ;1/7 City Receipt #: 42Q'i Z I � Critical Areas File #: f.�2�F-vl 0,0141 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: 10-- �`7- cRcCh A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. fflo deternune whet er any potenha nhca eas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy _....needed to. complete the Checklist should. '.be easily': -: of.this:form.-to•assist`City staff'in fihding:and.locating-the� -,available from -observe_ tions-of the site or -data -available at -_ - specific -piece of -property -described of this form. -In= - - City Hall '(Critical areas inventories, maps, or soiladdition, the applicant. shall ' include other pertinent surveys). information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City .of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information' and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to fil 's applic lion on the behalf of the owner as listed ibelow. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT _ DATE Property Owner's Authorization U ) U, I By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this lictoon. SIGNATURE OF OWNER �/ r%�'G� . DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: & b S c, h Name I`ll b 044MQic Street Address City State Zip Telephone: ` 5-1-7- il% 1 Email address (optional): App ' ant Representative: z Name lr�Tu LO u nil) 4 Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email Address (optionalj: t' 1 #P20 Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/ Location: �� ` o �� y � r yjle ui 19"" r v e 2. Property Tax Account Number: l $2 7 O y Z Ur O q c9 c o % 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): g 4tG:re S 4. - Is this site currently developed? V yes; no. If yes; how is, site developed?. 5 resic&-tz- CA File No: 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling:: : slopes. on site , generally less...tham- °,6 -.(a. verticah rise.of .10-feet..over . A. . horizontal-. - - - _ ---- - - - -- — - -- - Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and' less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet_ over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains�areas of year-round standing water: /10 ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of'seasonal standing water: A/0 ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain 7- -- of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface?-Flows.are year-round? Flows are seasonal?. (What time of year? . Ali ). 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious .wetland is present on site: A/ e9 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. —For City Staff Use Only - Plan Check Number, if applicable? U Site is. Zoned? SCS mapped soil type(s)? Q - Alci r- -icxy/ cam- velz as c,-4, 10 ,Y. R Am t5_ _-doze.-,. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? N6 . Li..,o/Sl iA'e Fia_rz� DETERMINATION ' �jSTUDY REQUIRED Reviewed bv:,- WAIVER r ., CI�T�Y -OF Ep11AONDS _ - z- CIVIC CENTER —WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT``Oall PRospect &1107 when work 'Is ready fo;.inspection. (No lnspea NU lions SIDE' SEWER PERMIT ona Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) 1 \ _ 0V, an1RESS..... .................................... 9.11.7.... Olympic ..View..Driue.................. .............................. `. fi q OVWER sIs�me.._FletchC'..................................... CON -TRACTOR ........ hc?i-Safe. ......................................... ....... .. y g R PP days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer Pe ission -is ranted .......A April • - -- ... 19.70.., for �yitl Cit Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. .A-T'1NTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOT No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer Inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must .� be employed, to construct side sewer In street area. Do not cover any poitlon of sewer before it has been Inspected. -- -1VOTNo. 2—Obtain full Information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. NO No. 3—Top,of,side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches Inside property line; minimum grade of 2q,. .No" benda'in grade sharper than % will be permitted. NO,1No:d4-Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for Jl failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. *Tn 5—It isunlawfulto alter or do any other work than Is -provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewe tenances' except to Insert the pipe into the wye. r OT its appur- P_q : -- - _ 0 - CITY- OF EDMONDS " a Call PRospect 0-1107 when work [+ Ch IC CENTER.'= WATEii-SEWER DEPARTMENT is ready for Inspection. (No Inspec. 3 U 46 SIDE SEWER PERMIT Saturday, Sunday or holidays.)0 { ADIDRES&.......................................lympic View_ Drive --- -----------------•--...............-----...............................................----------..........-------- OwxER ...... ........... . mes_ .Fletcher.-----......--- - ---- CONTRACTOR.......... San3 -Safe Perinissiol is granted ...... April..7...._•.............. 19.71P.., -for ........................ days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with_-Clty. Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. 'ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. I=The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct sidecsewer In street area. Do not cover'any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%. No bends in grade sharper than 'A will be permitted. - NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure -due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appur- tenances except to insert the pipe into the wye. I. TO ` '. ❑g AM Date Time U PM !/!/.HIILLE YOU�PoWERE OUT M of Phone ) 9n-7 t Z, t Y Area Code - Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL -CALL•EDTO SEE YOU WILL CALLAGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU - URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL_ lql Message �oE To: � � �-O ;4M Date 1ZSTime /�.J� ❑ PM WHILE: YOU W E.OUT M Phone C_) - Fo .,, 27 Area -Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO.SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS"TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Operator AMPAD REORDER ® EFFICIENCY0 #23•600: To Date Time D' AM D PM WHILE YOU WERE OUT of ho ky- Ian Phone �_) - ` . ,3 7-.-3_1 Area Code Number- Extension TELEPHONED - PLEASE CALL CALLEDTO'-SEE YOU` WILL.CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU. URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALLIJ Message Operator AMPAD ® ® EFFICIENCY - .REORDER M23-000 To SA% AM 2' ❑ Date �--Z-- Time PM WHI:I.,E YOU WERE OUIT M of. Phone Number Extension. Area,Code . TELEPHONED CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN. WANTS TO, SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Operator REORDER_ �AMPAD ®. #23-000 o EFFICIENCY w� y CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 9118 Olympic View Drive Tax Acct. Number: 18270420040007 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2006-141 Applicant: R. Liz Reinitz Owner: Bob Schmitt CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CRA-2006-141) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may be either adjacent to or contain critical areas, including Geologically Hazardous areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: • Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. • Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. • Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. • For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. October 27 Name /® Signatures Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. M L OTL I N E A D LJIv1 4T EXISTING LOT 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 9 OF CITY OF EDMONDS LOTUNE ADJUSTMENT 2003-185 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200401140865, BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, VISTA DEL MAR. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200010195002. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON. EXISTING LOT 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 10 OF CITY OF EDMONDS LOTUNE ADJUSTMENT 2003-I85 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20040114086% BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10. VISTA DEL MAR. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200010195002. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PROPOSED LOT 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION . THAT PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10 OF CITY OF EDMONDS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LL-2003-IM RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200401140865, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. SATE OF WASHINGTON. WHICH LIES NORTH AND NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE WEST MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, ALSO BEING THE NORTH MOST CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VISTA DEL MAR. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20011095002; THENCE NORTH 36.03'10' EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9. A DISTANCE OF 69.15 FEET TO THE TRUE PORT OF BEdNNING: THENCE SOUTH 55.06'09' EAST. A INSTANCE OF 102.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47.17'18- EAST. A DISTANCE OF 95.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55-06*43: EAST• A DISTANCE 1 77.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22'49'23EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41M FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88.49'54- EAST. A DISTANCE OF 30.32 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS UNE. PROPOSED LOT 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10 OF CITY OF EDMONDS LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. LL-2003-185, RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200401140865. RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, SATE OF WASHINGTON. WHICH LIES SOUTH AND SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE WEST MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, ALSO BEING THE NORTH MOST CORNER OF LOT Il OF VISTA DEL MAR. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20011095002; THENCE NORTH 36.03'10' EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9. A DISTANCE OF 69.15 FEET TO THE TRUE PdNT OF BEdNNING: THENCE SOUTH 55'O6.09- EAST, A DISTANCE OE 102.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47.1YIS' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 95.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55'O6'43• EAST. A DISTANCE OF 77.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22'4W23- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 43.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'49'54' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 30.32 FEET TO THE EAST LIE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS LINE. DasTING LOT AREA SO. FT ACRES LOT .9 43.850 1.0067 LOT 10 12.DD0 0.2755 PROPOSED LOT AREA SO. FT. ACRES LOT 9 24,816 0.5697 LOT 10 31,034 0.7124 SITE NOTES 1.EXISI1NG LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON TITLE REPORT FURNISHED BY PACIFIC NORTHWEST PILE INSURANCE COMPANY. INC. ORDER NUMBER 178584-1 AND 180500-1, DATED APRIL 4, 2006. 2.HORRONTAL DATUM: HAD 83/91 3.ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND. CINSTRUMENT- THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH A LEICA TCR 1203, SERIAL NUMBER 221188 AND LEICA AU1230 GPS UNIT. SERIAL NUMBER 160230. 5.PRECSION- PRECISION EXCEEDS 1:10.000 GROUND TRAVERSE METHODS AND WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAG 332-130-090. ZONING ZONING FOR THE LOTS SHOWN Is R12. / 17804 VISTA DEL MAR OR DECK \ MULTI -LEVEL / \ � `6-� �p'•� / .�/ MOOD HOUSETOP Of GRAL / ELEV. 17206" \\DRIV "o^'EVEII PROPOSED LOT LINE T.P.0.& / / / / � NBS'46'OB' r &' e // \\ .b. �8/ / /i� 'y i �/ LOT uaETO� BE REMOVED 1 -PROPOSED- '(4" ii / '%/ ! / LO 11 FENCE DECK 17901 �MSTA DEL MAR OR WOOD HOUSE TOP OF ROOF \ ELEV.- 157.3' O DI I CONCRETE WALK 6• WOOD FENCE N ( IN FEE' ) I Ixh - 30 Tc Y 2�j / C pY'fa. �\ \ / \/ -PROPOSED- LOT 1 ( 31.034 SOFT. / \ \ 0.7124 ACRES 24.816 SOT. 0.5697 ACRES I LOT LINE QA�KALT D REMNANT Oi IVEOLD/DEMO'0 / /LOT LINE It CONC. PAD L I / / / BE REMOVED / l 8� I L-49.79 / \ A-6' -;B R-45.0045.00 L-5.75 M 719'IV R-45.O1 KAIREZ DRIVE ASPHALT PAVING / x �t - PROPOSED i r.W LOT LINE/ A .• L-86.38 / 30.56' A-8595%O6' 515'E 5.21' 58BY1'44'E � G - - -_ 33.04' - pl• ----_ H CONCRETE WALK I \, I I \ I � I I 1, I I I i I I I VO I I I I I 40119'1 O'E 1 20.02' I L-31.a2 I e 90WQ- R-20.00 3 r, I � I I a I II I I I �s I JW (II I7 /I /I / I / I I I I JUR Vc I L/n � ULR I IFwA IL SURVEY IN THE This mop correctly represents o survey made by me or FOUINNRo BUSH, ROED SL HMHINGS, INC. SW A. SW Y4. SEC. 7, T 27 N. R 4 E, Filed for record this _ day of at _M under my direction In conformance with the requirements : W AND of the Survey Recording Act of the request of �: 'a CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS SE Ys, SE Ya, SEC. 12. T 27 N, R 3 E.W.M. in book _ of Surveys, of page _ at the request of $ KRANNITZ GEHL ARCHTI•ECTS 2008 MINOR AVE EAST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. In FEBRUA Y 2012 SEATTLE, WAG8102 W)e)323-4144 OWN. BY: OQR SCALE: 1:30 f3rI0 pW4LutA CHK. BY: OQR JOB N0.:2012023-00 . Mar. UD o ecor s Certir.cote No. BRH DATE:2/27/2012 ISHEET 1 OF 1 s 1 APPLICATION for LYNN PLANT -the City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No ................................. NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ❑ OWNER \,/. .1=!-l%.. ........ L--LL" C/1�f..�C- .�I. 8.. J. O CONTRACTOR ... PERMIT N .............. ADDRESS .. /_.L ..........4.1 �1Yi"� L.C......a1.ew....,O a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No ........... .................................... BLOCK N)-o.............................................. �! f NAME OF ADDITION ._...<I!�� -,-/CD.kCJC/.=.1%......... P .92......�.!...... zgPL.Ld `.� r IG !//mac-� � •�7 /9'/(�Ql� �s�/�/�U/r:I�s7 ��St%• i uj APPROVED APR-7 1970 Approved: / \ DATE ... .... X .d............... By , 49..< : ':................................... APPLICATION 'rfor The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION M,- REPAIRS 3V,-NER ----------------------------------------- VDDRESS ............ ........ APPP,.OVED APR 7 1970 flA-2W2AFrAw, I I!YIVM EASEMENT No - ------------------------------------------ 1 /,0 "/ / 6,-Y-,f ') CONTRACTOR ........................................... PERMIT No ... .. .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No. ........ 2 ---------------------------------- BLOCK No. A.2 .............. �fr- / 2 6,-- a g r- -s- u) c- 0 a - rH a- ;7-,Oe 171 NAME OF ADDITION&, .... ;7.10.... /Y/, 3,/ 10 Al <IV DATE .Y��.—.7R ............... BY -------- (JaA FF I C L!D AJ 7,-.b / "A w I 2-11 1-5000 r / � 1 1 12-34 � r 1 r 2-..2 J J J L I r r � n 1 I 1 I 1 fl r 1 a a 1 r � O I 1 2 D I r T1 , n I / / V r G 1.2 a' WOW- ,d 1 2-IA a r ' Q I , g,•v N I I � r , 1 • a ' _ - O 2-3 2-2 1-3 °15-2130 a 1-6 P 0 7 Date: 06/01/01 �Q 0 Time: 11:37:25 AM z User: PLSalo Field View 1 VV v .�/U 7 `-f o 2-16 2-130 2-9 2-11 2-13 ------------- X f 1 224 � P 25 2 2-68 1 1 1 1 Scale: 1 LY = 100 FT 2-12_ Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: Site Information (soils/topogra by/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address Location: HI I 2. Property Tax Account Number: 5944 ©oo o :�8 O 1 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4' Oar f-, 4. Is this site currently developed? _yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6.• Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 0 O : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: N C>;Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flow across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? N�A (What time of year? N ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawnshrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N O '.,+�is9�W ti +ti.�'r'_ ,.e:.­. _- �•cr '�,.r.,; •-w.}_: t, �a ,.r tp�,,. ;,fit r -::5.� .y.t.,. t _ r :.i>"'u.f 7.41'' .�. .. r1 ,b+, - •! Y. t t T. �,''E E j•r`' r'T' '1 S'' t F a ) at s .w6 7` L k r t , •�6 r'. .,.i91'3'i-..�.,:.S�.tra,�... a°r7T-,G `� � ,.� S. r I �.�`Qrr�.�7{iLLi lJ$�.a�j%t `` •. _ lit �,.i'r4 "2- t ..d- t a.. x' r � •t_ .ft1r1 5,...°,' ra A 4 �5 y..a•. f a� r '•n e t f- S -yA 1 <� -'i4 ,iat"a"!T I' i' ,i+-•,:,�§ � .. L5 ,c t+r. \ y{ .,ra.-^"'�(.t...+ r p _ , �'S t� -lr �2,."� te.r„ i�, f vL F1an��C�y,.luner� iftapplicabt�w �}`_,}5 t h.'� e' �' - ti a• cr r �+ 7 yx - a s y 1!- f t 1 t �T1 .,�� '`t� z l�.���t i 3• ".�.a' y<'+e a+:Ltj*a ? '�' [�.•aG�i;'� �`P� era T •art^, - � 4 't''L a t t .yr�.,� 3 } 'Y" � 1 cy. , s i,;•;((,.ib ...,r+' fir n. ' •"t .r. r � r , i, _ i ya.$1j!u.�f,.ca,5_•♦a • :�_. s .!: L a R t -> ra"-r'=.: x t -aa s �+t r s+- -�! . i t% D3{a v YH s i��`.5����.:-Y•�!k5'u'�;.c.: � "9 t �. t > :�S ".. �a3 ��r"5�-"h t""�h� � r, :�.,c t L�!•;.'*`7�.���.... i.� !�<t to 1�$ r - >}s�-`�T, i` - .'fc..M.^::a y.x sA �.calCAris€uaentory,�or C.A InA�-�HLT.D~�1.ai1.LL.ill Arf OIi aa�-.i t )L{:•a� .•. �-/, _./ £` tt > Yt r t f"<.t. ..,f J._Sir•J'^`�3xT:.�..�'hvT _e'. .- ..,. Sr. �'�''ft:a: �Cr - a - r - '.xar; - ..t ��c��'J.� :Sx?ai'.. �`xZil• s�ati :i ta�<�S y3' t t r gs * r�_ C tr A , � t c. + z .. T _7y t Z t 5 Siyi�r�.w des igna�ed earth subseiue hazard area? d..aht 4 ra r ih it '� .s•t 'a air "v C�.•'.. •� `?.L ttT t ,�aY! ° x .+ ; is S1L�f'P..'✓`N yt� t. '��5�� 3,dY Sf r. ...y '-t r 4.i. �•'q a a r 2 _ Yit ': ,13 'M y-ri-.afi Z �.r cppar•�� % ���c tyys �.n,.�,r;-• � ,- ,. +a .i�fr?n �.: , t '� �t .�' P � � � ; q irliF['3.G41\�t Ft_ Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 4? wA 1 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADolicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and convect to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPMANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER Owner/Applicant: G V--6L1 re-,Z Name Qll1 CrV b Street Address . CUMbY-CLs . LQA- City State Zip DATE Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Telephone: Email address (optional): Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 CA 17530 t 17600 i S ti 17624 17626 17628 17627 17702 ! i 17720 17707 ��- t{ ar_ 0 r 17748 42 17709 s. 17802 17715 17808 17819 1771 17839 8941 rr '.,,•"'•c, ..a•'•r r rpi` s .•x^a' r' 17905 05 \ W m �' �i 17927 ` =✓k "� } {T \ 17922 17924 17928 17928 17951 imp r` r 9001 18004 18010 13 9217 118005 8727921 jar i' 92118015 ^� 18020 18017 a 9221 18030 O N �^ �7 9223 91071' 0 9108 °' 9100 0 18109 1811 m 9235 9110 18121 9227 9102 g r 18107 18108 F 18128 9229 0 9112 9106 18206 9122 18130 18121 8717 ?7 9204 325 923 9118 \18218 18226 302 18 14 18128 9304 18210 8721 18228 9314 18215 18230 18300 N 9318 18220 ro �O 18230 9210 18229 8720 221 18302 18230 8306 18315 215 �06 18310 18311 8714 18312 18313 133 9131 18312 � Zoning and Vicinity Map 1 CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washirl-gton 98.020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works STrft� r--,. DATE: September 29, 1977 TO: Mr. Wayne Jones Reid, Middleton and Assoc., Inc. 324 Main St. Edmonds,WA 98020 TRANSMITTING: Ltr. from Miller and Morris Inc. dtd 8-23-77 regarding Claimant Nicholas Kariez, 9117 Olympic View Dr. AS YOU REQUESTED: FOR YOUR FILE: FOR YOUR INFO: XX REVIEW & COMMENT: AS WE DISCUSSED:' COMMENT F, RETURN: FOR YOUR APPROVAL: FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION: REMARKS: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BY : V• sh-Z LEIF LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works RHA:ly Enclosure ' • 24 Hour Phone 206 MU 2-8141 MILLER MORRIS INC* L O S S A S S E S S O R S Cable Address "MINC SEATTLE" 757 H A R R I S &K 04 E'E is"t Telex: 32-8933 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 `(i Ray Sittauer c/o Edmonds Planning Commission Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Sittauer: 23rd September 1977 RECEIVED 9 EP 28 1977 Public Works DepL Assured: Grant Construction Co. Loss Date: 14th June 1977 Type Loss: Soil Erosion Claimant: Nicholas Kariez Location: 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington Our File: C3-78165 We represent the insurance carrier providing the liability coverage for Grant Construction Co. It has been requested that we furnish you with a status report concerning the above captioned accident. We met with Mr. Kariez after the accident and have since had soils engineers survey the damage. We have furnished Mr. Kariez with a copy of the soils report and have requested that he obtain estimates from a landscaping or nursery firm so that we can establish a fair property damage figure. He has not obtained these estimates as yet, but as soon as he does so we will be glad to meet with him to discuss settlement. Very truly yours, MILLER & MORRIS INC. John Moser JM:ss BUILDING J A pv 0 7992 STREET FILE IN THE EDMONDS MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR SNOHOdISH COUNTY CITY OF EDMONDS, Plaintiff, vs GEORGE PLATON KAIREZ Defendant, STATE OF WASHINGTON, City of Edmonds TO: Dick Mumma ADDRESS: 250 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 No. 46318 SUBPOENA YOU ARE COMMANDED TO APPEAR: ON: January 19, 1993 at 1:30 p.m. at Edmonds Municipal Court, located at 650 Main Street (Plaza -top floor of Library) Edmonds, Washinqton 98020 to testify in the trial of the above encaptioned matter on the part of the plaintiff, the City of Edmonds, and to remain in attendance until you have given your testimony or have been dismissed or excused by the Court. DATED this 6th day of January ___ 96-= CLEIMV THE COURT 1993 � STREET FILE � o CITY OF EDMONDS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF A CRITICAL AREA STUDY George Kairez hereinafter referred to as "Proponent, " , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," and the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City," for and in consideration of mutual promises contained herein agree and contract as follows: The City's Planning Official has determined that a Critical Area may exist on or near the subject property, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15.B. II. The City is to direct and supervise preparation and finalization of a critical area study to describe the items in accordance with ECDC Section 20.15.B.150. IIB. Paragraph IIB shall be applicable only during the life of this contract. The work of the Consultant and the critical area study are for the purpose of providing the City with information and analysis, independent from the Proponent and the owner of the subject property. To that end, the Consultant shall, during the life of this agreement, perform no other services for Proponent with respect to the subject property. In addition, the Consultant shall not perform services for the Proponent with respect to other property or proposed developments without full disclosure thereof to the City. Proponent specifically agrees not to communicate with the Consultant, except for such communication as may be necessary for the Consultant to carry out the performance of this agreement. Any such communication between the Proponent and Consultant shall be carried on only in the presence of or with the prior approval of the City. III. Proponent agrees to pay to Consultant in the manner set forth in Section VII below the reasonable costs of having the critical area study prepared. The Consultant has been recommended and selected by the City. Proponent understands and agrees to pay Consultant for actual time and materials expended in accordance with the scope of services set forth in Attachment "A" hereto, provided, however, that the total to be received by the Consultant for preparation of the critical area study shall not exceed the sum of $ . Progress payments are to be issued to Consultant in accordance with the provisions of Sections VII and IX in this agreement. IV. The Proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both Consultant and the City so as to cause the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. The City agrees to make available to the Consultant all relevant information in the City's files. V. The scope of services contemplated by this agreement shall include preparation of a critical area study which shall be delivered to the City on or before VI. Consultant shall prepare and deliver to the City up to 5 copies of the critical area study. VII. Proponent shall, within ten (10) days of the signing of this agreement: (a) Deposit with the City of Edmonds funds sufficient to pay for the cost of preparation of the critical area study, but not less than $ subject to the provisions of subparagraph (b) below; (b) Agree to disbursement from time to time of funds on deposit in said account to pay for Consultant services covered by the Agreement. Page 1 of 4 CA92.91 C/12-30-91CRUICAUCONTRACr VIII. If the Proponent fails to deposit funds with the City as specified in Section VII of this agreement within the required ten days, this agreement shall terminate. IX. Consultant agrees to submit invoices for services and costs to date on a monthly basis along with a description of services rendered and a project progress report. The Consultant shall submit the original invoice to the City and a copy to the Proponent. The City shall pay the invoiced amount from the assigned account described in paragraph VII of this agreement within thirty (30) days of receipt if the work covered by the invoice has been satisfactorily completed. X. In the event the City, in its sole opinion determines there is a need for changes in the scope of work in Attachment "A," the City shall obtain from the Consultant an estimate of the total added charges and shall seek the Proponent's written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall then be amended to cover these changes, and the funds deposited accordingly to cover the changed scope of work. Failure to obtain such approval from the Proponent and to obtain an increase in the funds deposited to cover the proposed changes at the time of amendment, shall be grounds for suspension of work until agreement is reached. XI. The parties hereto agree that the critical area study and all supporting material therein submitted by the Consultant in the course of performing services under this agreement shall be, in the hands of the City of Edmonds, as public records and not subject to copyright. Consultant further agrees to make research notes and any other work products produced in performing this agreement available to the City for reproduction, upon completion of the critical area study, or sooner upon request by the City. XII. Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this proposal shall be governed by the laws of the City of Edmonds and the State of Washington. XIII. (a) The parties intend that an independent Consultant/City relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee, or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, or representative of the City or Proponent for any purpose. Employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits the City provides for City employees. The Consultant will be responsible for the acts of its employees; agents, and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to testify at any hearing concerning the project or the critical area study only if requested to do so by the City, unless pursuant to court order. (b) Consultant covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability, cost and expense,, including reasonable attorney's fees, in connection with or occasioned, in whole or in part by any act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, customers, or licensees, or arising from or out of Consultant's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement, regardless of whether it is alleged or proven that the acts or omissions of City, it officers, agents or employees caused or contributed thereto. With respect to the performance of this Agreement, and as to claims against City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties. This indemnity provision shall not apply in the event any acts or omissions of the City were the sole cause of any Page 2 of 4 CA92-91 C/ 12-30.92.CRrrICAL\CONTRACT such damage or injury. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees and the Consultant, its officers, agents, and employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees. (c) In the performance ' of the services herein contemplated, the Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the work, subject to applicable regulations. However, the results of the work contemplated herein must meet the approval of the City, and shall be subject to the City's general rights of inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof, as required by ECDC Chapter 20.15.B. XIV. Proponent agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for breach of contract or other claim for damages brought by Consultant on account of any act or failure to act by the Proponent to pay the sums due under the terms of this Agreement. XV. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. XVI. The City reserves the right to suspend or terminate this agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and Proponent. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. The Consultant shall then invoice the City for all work performed in a satisfactory manner through the effective date of termination, and shall be paid by the City, subject to the limitations on liability contained in Paragraph IX; provided that if the termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, no payment shall be due. XVII. The Proponent reserves the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and City, and withdrawal of all related building, zoning, subdivision, and/or shoreline permit applications. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be. entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. XVIII. In the event that any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms of the Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party a sum for reasonable attorney's fees, including reasonable attorneys fees incurred prior to the filing of the action. M. Consultant agrees to report to the City any situation that might involve a possible conflict of interest in connection with the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall not have a financial interest in the proposal other than fees due under this Agreement. The Consultant will not perform any work or provide any services to any person in connection with or related to the Proposal, except as provided in this Agreement. The Consultant has listed in Attachment "B" all present contracts or work for the Proponent. XX. The Proponent agrees to provide the Consultant with a legal description of the project site, reproducible site plan or plans, copies of any relevant site studies produced by other consultants, and such other information as required by the Consultant. The proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both the City and Consultant so as to facilitate the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. XXI. This Agreement, including the Attachments hereto, represent the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and any negotiations, proposals, or agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by this written Agreement. Page 3 of 4 CA92-91 Cl 12-3492.CRITICAUCONTRACT • • ATTACHMENTS EXECUTED by the parties hereto this day of CITY OF EDMONDS: CONSULTANT, By By Laura Hall name: Mayor title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: PROPONENT, By By Rhonda March George Kairez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING MANAGER: By By Scott Snyder Rob Chave, Manager City Attorney Planning Division Attachments: "A" - Scope of Services "B" - Consultant/Proponent Contracts/Relationships I ,19 Page 4 of 4 CA92-91 C/12-30-92.CRRICAUCONTRACT 0 STREET FILE 0 ATTACHMENT "A" SCOPE OF WORK FOR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY CA-92-91 1. Geotechnical Study of the Site pursuant to the criteria established in ECDC Sections 20.15B.070.A.3 and 20.15.B.120 and other applicable sections of chapter 20.15B. This evaluation shall also include recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures if applicable. 2. Evaluation of the status of the Eagle nesting habitat on .the subject property and its immediate vicinity pursuant to the criteria established in ECDC Sections 20.15B.070.A.1 and 20.15B.100 and other applicable sections of chapter 20.15B. This evaluation shall also include recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures if appropriate. Where boundaries are established for either of the above critical areas, said boundaries and required associated buffer areas (pursuant to ECDC Chapter 20.15B) shall be delineated, with a legal description and survey prepared and stamped by a Registered Land Surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington. CA92-91 S/ 12-30-91CRUICAUCONTRACr 20.15B.020 20.15E CHAPTER 20.15E INTERIM CRITICAL AREAS 20.15B.010 LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS The purpose of this Chapter is to establish special interim standards for the protection of Critical Areas in compliance with the provisions of the Washington Growth Management Act of 1990 (RCW 36.70 A and HB 2929) and to supplement the development requirements contained in the Edmonds Municipal Code, for the purpose of regulating development of lands, based on the existence of Critical Areas as defined in this Chapter. The standards and procedures established in this Chapter are intended to protect environmentally Critical Areas while accommodating the rights of property owners to use their property in a reasonable manner. It has been determined that the City of Edmonds does not contain any Natural Resource Lands as defined by the Growth Management Act. By regulating development and alterations to Critical Areas and their buffers this Chapter seeks to: A. Protect members of the public, and public and private resources and facilities from injury, loss of life, property damage or financial losses due to flooding, erosion, landslide., seismic events, soils subsidence or steep slope failure; B. Protect unique, fragile and valuable elements of the environment including streams, wetlands, wildlife and its habitat; C. Mitigate impacts to environmentally Critical Areas and their buffers that are excepted, allowed, or otherwise authorized under this Chapter by regulating alterations in and adjacent to them; D. Reduce cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water availability, water quality, wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources; E. Alert members of the public, including: appraisers, assessors, owners, potential buyers, or lessees, to the development limitations of Critical Areas and their required buffers; and F. Provide City officials with the information and authority to protect Critical Areas and their buffers, and implement the policies of the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW CH. 43.21C, the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, and the Growth Management Act of 1990. (05/31/92) 267-1 20.15B.020 DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Chapter, the follo.ing definitions shall apply: A. Adiacent. "Adjacent" means a development proposal within an area to twice the standard buffer as set back established by this Chapter for the Critical Area. B. Alteration. "Alteration" means any human -induced action which J changes the existing condition of a Critical Area or its buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to: grading; filling; dredging; draining; channelizing; cutting, pruning, limbing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing vegetation; applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance; discharging pollutants; paving, construction, application of gravel; modifying for surface water management purposes: or any other human activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat value of a Critical Area. C. Best Management Practices. "Best Management Practices" means a system of practices'and management measures that: 1. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, and toxics; 2. Control the movement of sediment and erosion caused by land alteration activities; 3. Minimize adverse impacts to surface and ground water f� quality, flow, and circulation patterns: and �® 4. Minimize adverse impacts to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of critical areas. "Buffer" D. Buffer. means the designated area immediately next to and a part of a.steep slope or landslide hazard area and which rn protects slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risks to persons or property; or a designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem. �� 7 E. City. "City" means the City of Edmonds. "Class" rn F. Class. or "wetland class" means descriptive categories of wetland vegetation communities within the wetlands taxonomic classification system of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • (Cowardin, et al 1979). G. Clearing. "Clearing" means the act of cutting and/or removing' vegetation. This definition shall include grubbing vegetation. 267-2 (05/31/92) 20.15B.020 20.15B.020 H. Compensation Proiect. "Compensation Project" means an action(s) specifically designed to replace project induced Critical Area or buffer losses. Compensation project design elements may include, but are not limited to: land acquisition procedures; detailed plans including: functional value assessments, detailed landscaping designs, construction drawings, and monitoring and contingency plans. 1. Compensatory Mitigation. "Compensatory Mitigation" means replacing project induced Critical Area or buffer losses or impacts. Compensatory mitigation can include, but is not limited to restoration or creation of lost or impacted functional values. Enhancement of Critical Areas may be used for partial compensatory mitigation per the requirements of Section 20.158.160 of this Chapter. J. Creation. "Creation" means a compensation project performed to intentionally establish a wetland or stream at a site where one did not formerly exist. K. Critical Areas. "Critical Areas" for the City of Edmonds means fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, streams, and wetlands, each as defined within this Section of this Chapter. L. Critical Habitat. "Critical Habitat" means habitat areas associated with endangered, threatened, rare, sensitive, or monitor species as defined by the State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These habitats, if altered, could reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. Such habitat areas are documented with reference to lists, categories, and definitions of species promulgated by the Washington Department of Wildlife (Non -game Data System Special Animal Species) as identified in WAC 232- 12-011 or 232-12-014 and in the Priority Habitat Species lists compiled in compliance with WAC 365-190-080; or by rules and regulations adopted currently or thereafter by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. M. Developable Area. "Developable Area" means the area outside of any Critical Area and its required setback or buffer. N. Development Proposal. "Development Proposal" means any activity relating to the use and/or development of land requiring a permit or approval from the City, including but not limited to: commercial or residential building permit; binding site plan; conditional use permit; franchise: right-of-way permit; grading and clearing permit; mixed use approval; planned residential development; shoreline conditional use permit; shoreline substantial development permit; shoreline variance; short subdivision; special use permit; subdivision; (05/31/92) 267-3 flood hazard permit; unclassified use permit; utility and other use permit; variance; rezone: or any subsequently required permit or approval not expressly exempted by this Chapter. Enhancement. "Enhancement" means an action taken to improve the condition and function of a Critical Area. In the case of wetland or stream, the term means a compensation project performed to improve the conditions -of an existing degraded wetland or stream to increase its functional value. P. Erosion. "Erosion" means the process in which soil particles are mobilized and transported by natural agents such as wind, rain, frost action, or stream flow. Q. Existing and Ongoing Agriculture. "Existing and Ongoing Agriculture" means those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2), and those activities involved in the production of crops or livestock. Activities may include the operation and maintenance of farm and stock ponds or drainage ditches; operation and maintenance of existing ditches, J irrigation systems including irrigation laterals, canals, or irrigation drainage ditches; changes from one type of agricultural activity to another agricultural activity; and normal maintenance, repair, or operation of existing serviceable structures, facilities, or improved areas. Activities which bring a non agricultural area into agricultural use are not part of an ongoing operation. An operation ceases to be ongoing when the area on which it is conducted is converted to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle for more than five years. R. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. "Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas" means those areas within the City of Edmonds which provide habitat for state or federally listed rare, endangered, threatened, or sensitive species; for species of local importance as defined by this Chapter and identified in the Administrative Rules; or for habitat communities of exceptional habitat value inventoried and mapped within the City. S. Floodplain. "Floodplain" means the total area subject to inundation by a 11100-year flood". 11100-year flood" means a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. • T. Frequently Flooded Areas. "Frequently Flooded Areas" means • those lands in the floodplain subject to a one percentor greater chance of flooding in any given year. These areas include, but are not limited to: streams, rivers, lakes, coastal areas, wetlands, and the like. 267-4 (05/31/92) 20.15a.020 2o.15s.020 U. Functions. "Functions" means the roles served by Critical Areas including, but not limited to: water quality protection and enhancement; fish and wildlife habitat; food chain support; flood storage, conveyance and attenuation; groundwater recharge and discharge; erosion control; :rave attenuation; aesthetic value protection; and recreation. These roles are not listed in order of priority. V. Geologically Hazardous Areas. "Geologically Hazardous Areas" means areas that because of their susceptibility to erosion, landslide, sliding and/or potential seismic instabilities, are not suited to development consistent with public health or safety concerns. For the City of Edmonds these areas include the following: 1. Erosion Hazard Areas are those areas of the City of Edmonds containing soils •.which may experience severe to very severe erosion hazard. This group of soils includes but is not limited to the following when they occur on slopes of fifteen percent (15%) or greater: a. Alderwood soils (15%-253 slopes) b. Alderwood/Everett Series (258-70% slopes) C. Everett Series (15%-25% slopes) 2. Landslide Hazard Areas are those areas of the City of Edmonds which, by reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography, has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The 1979 report of "Roger Lowe Associates, as amended by the 1985 report of Geoengineers, Inc.,• and the landslide hazard maps established as a part of said reports, are incorporated by this reference and made a part of this Chapter as fully as if herein set forth. Areas designated on said maps, or areas which match the criteria as Geological Hazard Areas as defined by this Chapter shall be subject to the requirements of this Chapter. Field criteria for identifying Landslide Hazard areas include the following: a. Any area with slopes greater than fifteen percent (15%) and impermeable soils (typically silt and clay) frequently interbedded with granular soils (predominantly sand and gravel) and springs or groundwater seepage; b. Any area which includes areas with significant visible evidence of groundwater seepage, and which also includes existing landslide deposits, regardless of slope; C. Any area which has shown movement during the Holocene epoch (from 10,000 years ago to present) or which is underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch as determined by a qualified geologist or geotechnical consultant; d. Any area potentially unstable as a. result of rapid stream incision or stream bank erosion; or e. Any area located on an alluvial fan, presently subject to, or potentially subject to, inundation by debris flow or deposition of stream -transported sediments. 3. Steep Slope Hazard Areas are those areas where the ground rises at an inclination of 30% or more within a vertical elevation change of at least ten feet (a vertical rise of ten feet or more, for every thirty-three feet of horizontal distance). A slope is delineated by establishing its toe and top, and measured by averaging the inclination over at least ten feet of vertical distance. Seismic Hazard Areas are those areas subject to severe risk of earthquake damage as a result of seismically induced landslides, earth adjustments, settlement or soil liquefaction. W. Geologist. "Geologist" means a person who has earned a degree in geology from an accredited college or university and has at least five years of experience as a practicing geologist or four years of experience and at least two years of post- graduate study, research or teaching. The practical experience shall include at least three years work in applied geology and landslide evaluation in close association with qualified practicing geologists and geotechnical/civil engineers. X. Geotechnical Engineer. "Geotechnical Engineer" means a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least four years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge including experience with landslide evaluation. Y. Grading. "Grading" means any one or combination of excavating, filling, or disturbance of that portion of the soil profile which contains decaying organic matter. Z. Habitats of Local Importance. "Habitats of Local Importance" include a seasonal range or habitat element with which a given species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce. the likelihood that the species will maintain and (05/31/92) 267-5 267-6 (05/31/92) • 20.15B.020 20.15B.020 reproduce over the long-term. These might include areas of high relative density or species richness, breeding habitat, winter range, and movement corridors. These might also include habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability to alteration, such as cliffs, shorelines, coastal beaches, mud flats and eel -grass beds, and wetlands. AA. Long-term Commercial Significance. "Long-term Commercial Significance" means the growing capacity, productivity, and soil composition of the land for long-term commercial production, in consideration with the land's proximity to population areas, and the possibility of more intense uses of land. BB. Mitigation. "Mitigation" means the use of any or all of the following actions that are listed in descending order of preference: 1. Avoid the impact altogether by not,taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the affected Critical Area; a. Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation or maintenance operations during the life of the development proposal; 5. Compensate for the impact by replacing, enhancing or providing substitute Critical Areas and environments; and 6. Monitor the impacts and take appropriate corrective measures. CC. Native Growth Protection Easements. "Native Growth Protection Easements (NGPE)" means an easement granted to the City for the protection of native vegetation within a Critical Area or its buffer. DD. Native Vegetation. "Native Vegetation" means vegetation comprised of plant species which are indigenous to the Puget Sound region and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Native vegetation does not include noxious weeds as defined by the State of Washington or federal agencies. (05/31/92) 267-7 EE. Natural Resource Lands. "Natural Resource Lands" means agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands which have long-term commercial significance. FF. Noxious Weeds. "Noxious weeds" means any plant which when established is highly destructive, competitive or difficult to control by cultural or chemical practices, as further listed in Title 16-750 WAC. GG. Qualified Critical Area Consultant. "Qualified Critical Area Consultant" means a person who has the qualifications specified below to conduct Critical Areas studies pursuant to this Chapter, and to make recommendations for Critical Areas mitigation. For areas of potential geologic instability, the qualified Critical Areas consultant shall be a geologist or geotechnical engineer. For wetlands and streams, the qualified Critical Areas consultant shall be a specialist in botany, fisheries, wetland biology, and/or hydrology with a minimum of two years field experience with wetlands and/or streams in the Pacific Northwest. HH. Resource Lands. "Resource Lands" means areas with long-term • commercial timber, agricultural, and mineral values. II. Restoration. "Restoration" means the actions necessary to retukn a stream, wetland or other Critical Area to a state in which its stability, and functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as possible. JJ. Species of Local Importance. "Species of Local Importance" means those species that are of local concern due to their population status, their sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game (hunted) species. KK. Streams. "Streams" means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The channel or bed need not contain water year-round. This definition is not meant to include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or used to convey streams naturally occurring prior to construction of such watercourse. Streams are further categorized into Categories 1, 2 and 3 as follows: 267-8 1. Category 1 Streams. "Category 1 Streams" means those streams where the mean annual flow is greater than twenty cubic feet per second and it is either defined as "Shorelines of the State" under the City's Shoreline Management Regulations and the Edmonds Shoreline Master Program pursuant to RCW Chapter 90.58. (05/31/92) 20.15B.020 20.15B.030 2. Category 2 Streams. "Category 2 Streams" means those streams smaller than Category 1 streams and which are perennial; or those streams which are perennial or ephemeral and are used by salmonids. 3. Category 3 Streams. "Category 3 Streams" means those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids. LL. Stormwater Management Manual. "Stormwater Management Manual" means the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (June 1991, Draft) manual currently in Draft form by the Washington State Department of Ecology. MM. Urban Growth. "Urban Growth" means growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures, and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricultural products; or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources. When allowed to spread over wide areas, urban growth typically requires urban governmental services. Land can by characterized by urban growth when urban growth is located upon it, or the land is located in relationship to an area with urban growth on it as to be appropriate for urban growth. NN. Vadose Zone. "Vadose Zone" means the surface layers of the soils and earth which may contain shallow water -tables above permanent groundwater areas. 00. Wetlands. "Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence ofvegetation typically adapted for life in -saturated soil conditions. Wetlands include bogs, swamps, marshes, ponds and similar areas. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 40 'CFR 232.2(r)(1988). Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities. However, wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non - wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands if permitted by the City (WAC 365-190-010). PP. Wetland Functions. "Wetland Functions" means those natural processes performed by wetlands, such as facilitating food chain production, providing habitat for nesting, rearing and resting sites for aquatic, terrestrial or avian species, maintaining the availability and quality of water, acting as (05/31/92) 267-9 recharge and/or discharge areas for groundwater aquifers, and moderating surface water and storm water flows. 20 15B 030 APPLICABILITY AND GENERAL PROCEDURES Applicability and Compliance. This Chapter establishes regulations and procedures for the protection of lands which contain or are adjacent to Critical Areas. Compliance with the provisions of this Chapter shall be required of all development proposals within the City, as defined in Section 20.15B.020(N), except as provided in Section 20.15B.040 below. The City may approve, approve with conditions, or deny any development proposal in order to comply with the requirements and carry out the goals, purposes, and objectives of this Chapter. In the event any provision of this Chapter conflicts with any other applicable law or Chapter, that which provides the greatest protection to the Critical Area shall apply. Prior to fulfilling the requirements of this Chapter, the City shall not grant any approval or permission to conduct development or use in a Critical Area. Administrative Rules. The City Planning Department may develop and adopt Administrative Rules for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Chapter in a more consistent and prescribed manner. C. Inventory and Mapping. This Chapter shall apply to all Critical Areas located within the City of Edmonds. The City shall conduct an inventory of the Critical Areas in compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. Critical Areas not mapped are presumed to be present within the City and are protected by the provisions of this Chapter. In the event that there is a conflict between a mapped Critical Area and the criteria set forth in this Chapter, the criteria and the site specific conditions shall control. 20.15B 040 EXEMPTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS General Exemptions. The provisions of this Chapter and any administrative rules promulgated hereunder shall not apply to the following: 1. Emergencies that threaten the public health, safety and welfare as defined in Title 20.110.020 (D) of the ECDC; 2. Remodelling, reconstruction or replacement of legal structures and improvements that do not meet the • requirements of this Chapter but which are in existence on the date this Chapter becomes effective, provided that such activity does not increase the potential impact to a Critical Area or its buffer, or in the case of an existing structure or improvement in geologically hazardous areas, 267-10 (05/31/92) 20.15B.040 20.15B.050 does not create the potential of soil. movement or risk of harm or damage to existing uses or development; or to the public safety; 3. Normal and routine maintenance or repair of existing utility structures or developed rights-of-aay; or installation, relocation, replacement, operation, or alteration of utilities within existing public rights -of - way or public easements. Alterations caused to fish and wildlife habitats, streams, or wetlands by utility work within an existing right-of-way must restore the Critical Area to, at the least, its former functional value at the completion of the utility construction; 0. Existing and ongoing agriculture as defined in Section 20.15B.020(Q) of this Chapter., Such activities shall not allow Critical Areas or their buffers which are not currently under agricultural use to be converted to agricultural use. Normal and routine maintenance of existing irrigation and drainage ditches shall be exempt except for those ditches used by salmonids; or i. An application for a building permit for a lot within a development for which a Critical Area study previously has been prepared; provided, that ' the previous study contemplated and evaluated the type of. development proposed to occur on the lot. This exemption does not preclude City staff from conditioning a land -division permit pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter to require subsequent individual building permit review on specific lots within a subdivision or short plat. Except for emergencies as outlined in subparagraph A(1) in this Section, City Planning staff shall review the proposed action and determine whether or not the proposal is subject to these exemption provisions. The intention of this Section is to allow staff to waive the requirements of this Chapter for actions which are determined to either not pose any threat to a Critical Area or its buffer, or which are ongoing and existing activities which were in place prior to the implementation of this Chapter. B. Public Aaencv or Utility Exception. If the application of this ordinance would prohibit a development proposal essential to its ability to provide service by a public agency or public. utility, the agency or utility may apply for an exception pursuant to this section. After holding a public hearing the hearing examiner may.approve the exception if they find that there is no other feasible alternative to the proposed development with less impact on Critical Areas, and the proposal minimizes the impact on Critical Areas. Any decision of the hearing examiner is final unless appealed pursuant to Section 20.15B.180(C). Proposals approved for an Exception by this section shall be constructed using Best Management Practices as defined within this Section 20.15B.020(C). Reasonable Use Exception. If the application of this ordinance would deny all reasonable use of the property, development may be allowed which is consistent with the general purposes of this ordinance and the public interest provided that the hearing examiner, after a public hearing finds: 1. This ordinance would otherwise deny all reasonable use of the property; 2. There is no other reasonable use consistent with the underlying zoning with less impact on the Critical Area or its buffer; 3. The proposed development does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety or welfare on or off the property; 4. Any proposed alteration of the Critical Area or its buffer • is minimized to the extent possible to allow for reasonable use of the property; 5. The proposed activity complies with all state, local, and federal laws including those related to sediment control, pollution control, floodplain restrictions, and on -site wastewater disposal; and 6. The inability to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant or a predecessor in title in segregating or dividing the property and creating the undevelopable condition after the effective date of this Chapter. 7. The applicant has pursued all available administrative remedies to obtain reasonable use including the provisions of Section 20.15B.180(A). Any decision of the Hearing Examiner regarding this reasonable use exception shall be final unless appealed to the City Council pursuant to Section 20.15B.180(C). 20.15B.050 SEQUENCE OF ACTIONS When an application for a development proposal, as defined by this • Title, is made, the following sequence of actions will be required of the applicant and City staff, prior to the staff accepting the permit application into the review process. Details of the full Sequence of Actions will be contained in the Administrative Rules for this Title. (05/31/92) 267-11 267-12 (05/31/92) 20.158.060 20.158.070 A. Applicant completes and submits a Critical Areas Checklist, as provided in the Administrative Rules for this Chapter, to Planning staff; B. Staff reviews the Checklist and determines any requirement for detailed Critical Area study within three weeks of receipt of the Checklist or waiver for further study as outlined in Section 20.15B.150; C. A Pre -application Meeting is conducted by staff to explain the significance of Critical Areas on the development permit process and timing. Included will, be an explanation of Standards of Approval, and applicable Development Standards, as outlined in Section 20.1513.080 et. seq., and other applicable state and federal laws. The Pre -application meeting shall be set at the earliest possible time, after staff review of the Checklist, for City staff and the applicant; D. If a Critical Area is determined to be present then there will be a requirement for a Critical Area Study per Section 20.15B.150 of the Title. The development permit application will not be considered complete until the completed Critical Areas study is submitted; City staff will review the Critical Area Study and the development proposal within three weeks of receipt; The development permit application shall be conditioned to meet the provisions of the Chapter; or, if it is determined that adverse Critical Area impacts will be authorized, to provide for reasonable use of a property, then the applicant shall submit the design of a detailed Compensatory Mitigation Plan per the standards of Section 20.15B.160; and City staff shall review the proposed Compensatory Mitigation Plan to determine acceptance/denial of the proposed compensation. City staff may request review of the proposal by resource agency staff or a technical consultant of their choosing per Section 20.15B.150E. 20.15B.060 PRE -APPLICATION MEETING When it is determined that a development proposal may impact a Critical Area or its buffer, the applicant and their representative shall meet with the City planning official prior to the submittal of any development permit applications. Prior to the Pre -application meeting the applicant will have completed a Critical Area Checklist and submitted it to staff for review. The purpose of the pre -application meeting is to review the proposed project in relation to the Standards of Approval, Section 20.15B.080, and the applicable Development Standards, Section (05/31/92) 267-13 20.1513.090 through Section 20.15B.140; to establish the need for Critical Area Studies, as outlined in Section 20.15B.150, and, when potential adverse impacts` to Critical Areas or their buffers are indicated, to utilize the appropriate sequence of mitigation actions as outlined in Section 20.15B.160. In addition, the applicant shall be notified of the existence of federal and state regulations regarding wetlands or other Critical Areas and that it is the applicants' responsibility to determine the applicability of state and federal regulations to the applicants proposed action. 20.1513.070. CLASSIFICATION Critical Areas. The following areas, as defined in Section 20.15B.020, are classified as Critical Areas: frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, streams, wetlands, and wildlife habitat conservation areas. 1. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Fish and Wildlife habitat conservation areas are those areas within the City of Edmonds which provide habitat for state or federally listed rare, endangered, threatened, or sensitive species; for species of local importance as identified in the Administrative Rules; or for habitat communities of exceptional habitat -value inventoried and mapped within the City. Aquatic habitats and dependent species such as salmonids are also regulated under Section 20.15B.120, relating to streams, and Section 20.1513.130, relating to wetlands. Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas may be classified into the following two classes based on the criteria provided: 267-14 a. Critical Habitats. (i) Known or documented habitat for any species listed by the state or federal process as rare, endangered, threatened, or sensitive. Approximate locations of such habitats will be available for City staff review on maps located at City Hall and provided by the Washington State Department of Wildlife. Mapped locations of habitat for known listed species shall not be made available for public disclosure. (ii) Streams, rivers, and wetlands used by salmonids. Refer to Sections 20.15B.120 and 20.158.130 for further detail. b. Significant Habitats. (i) Inventoried and mapped habitat for species identified as having local significance within the City of Edmonds. Areas may include, for example, (05/31/92) • 20.15B.070 20.158.070 specific areas known to be utilized by large numbers of migratory waterfowl, or (ii) Habitats of significance within the City of Edmonds as inventoried and mapped during the City's Critical Area mapping process. Frequently Flooded Areas. Those lands in the floodplain subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. These areas include, but are not limited to: streams, rivers, lakes, coastal areas, wetlands, and the like. These lands are regulated under Title 19.97 of the City of Edmonds Code. Geologically Hazardous Areas. Those areas subject to potential erosion, landslide, and/or potential seismic instabilities, including the following: a. Erosion Hazard Areas. Erosion Hazard Areas, which are those areas of the City of Edmonds containing soils which, may experience severe to very severe erosion hazard. This group of soils includes but is not limited to the following when they occur on slopes of fifteen percent (15%) or greater: (i) Alderwood soils (15%-252 slopes). (ii) Alderwood/Everett Series (25%-70% slopes). (iii) Everett Series (15%-25t slopes). b. Landslide Hazard Areas. Landslide hazard areas are those areas of the City of Edmonds which, by reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography, has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The 1979 report of Roger Lowe Associates, as amended by the 1985 report of Geoengineers, Inc., and the landslide hazard maps established as a part of said reports, are incorporated by this reference and made a part of this Chapter as fully as if herein set forth. Areas designated on said maps, or areas which match the criteria as Geological Hazard Areas as defined by this Chapter shall be subject to the requirements of this Chapter. Field criteria for identifying Landslide Hazard areas include the following: (i) Any area with slopes of fifteen percent (15%) or greater and impermeable soils (typically silt and clay) frequently interbedded with granular soils (predominantly sand and gravel) and springs or groundwater seepage; (ii) Any area which includes areas with significant visible evidence of groundwater seepage, and which also includes existing landslide deposits regardless of slope; (iii) Any area which has shown movement during the Holocene epoch (from 10,000 years ago to present) or which is -underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch as determined by a qualified geologist or geotechnical consultant; (iv) Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision or stream bank erosion; or (v) Any area located on an alluvial fan, presently subject to, or potentially subject to, inundation by debris flow or deposition of stream -transported sediments. C. Steen Slooe Hazard Areas. Steep Slope Hazard Areas, which are those areas where the ground rises at an inclination of 30% or more within a vertical elevation change of at least 10 feet (a vertical rise of 10 feet or more for every 33 feet of horizontal distance). A slope is delineated by establishing its toe and top, and measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical distance. d. Seismic Hazard Areas. Seismic Hazard Areas, which are those areas subject to severe risk of earthquake damage as a result of seismically induced landslides, earth adjustments, settlement or soil liquefaction. 4. Streams. As defined within Section 20.15B.020(KK) means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, or the passage of water. The channel or bed need not' contain water year-round. Streams are further classified into Categories 1, 2 and 3 as follows: J Category 1 Streams. "Category 1 Streams" means those streams where the mean annual flow is greater than twenty cubic feet per second and the stream 19 meets the criteria for a "Shorelines of the State" under the Edmonds Shoreline Master Program pursuant to RCW Title 90.58. (05/31/92) 267-15 267-16 (05/31/92) 20.15B.070 20.158.080 b. Category 2 Streams. "Category 2 Streams" means those streams smaller than Category 1 streams and which are perennial; or those that are perennial or ephemeral and are used by salmonids. C. Category 3 Streams. "Category 3 Streams" means those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids. 5. Wetlands. Wetlands as defined in Section 20.15B.020(OO) are.classi.fied according to the following criteria. Note that the term "class, or wetland class" as defined in Section 20.15B.020 refers to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service classification of wetlands based on vegetative communities. The rating of a wetland is determined by evaluating the entire wetland in question, not just that portion located on the property in question. (05/31/92) a. Category 1 Wetlands. "Category 1 Wetlands" means wetlands which meet any of the following criteria: (i) The presence of species listed by the federal government or state as endangered or threatened, or the presence of critical or outstanding habitat for those species; or (ii) Wetlands having 40% to 60% permanent open water in dispersed patches with two or more classes of vegetation; or (iii) Wetlands equal to or greater than 5 acres in size and having three or more wetland classes, one of which is open water; or (iii) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence. These include, but are not limited, to mature forested communities and bog systems. b. Category 2 Wetlands. "Category 2 Wetlands" means wetlands which meet any of the following criteria: (i) Wetlands greater than 1 acre in size; or (ii) Wetlands equal to or less than 1 acre and greater than 2,500 square feet and having two or more wetland classes; or (iii) Wetlands equal to or less than 1 acre and greater than 2,500 square feet that have a forested wetland class; or 267-17 (iv) The presence of heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees. C. Category 3 Wetlands. "Category 3 Wetlands" means wetlands that are equal to or less than 1 acre and greater than 2,500 square feet and that have one wetland class. 20.15B.080 STANDARDS OF APPROVAL No alteration of a Critical Area or its buffer shall be permitted unless the City grants an exception pursuant to Section 20.158.040. In addition, the project must follow the prescribed sequencing of mitigation as outlined within Section 20.15B.150. Any permitted alteration of -a Critical Area or its buffer shall comply with the requirements of this Title. A. Regulated Activities. Any development proposal, as defined by this Chapter, which may impact a Critical Area or its buffer, shall be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Chapter. Such regulated activities shall be undertaken • following the sequence of mitigation established within Section 20.15B.160. The following activities within Critical Areas or their buffers shall be regulated pursuant to this Chapter: 1. The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of soil, sand, gravel, minerals, organic matter, or material of any kind; 2. The dumping, discharging, or filling with any material; 3. The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the water level or water table; 4. The driving of pilings; 5. The placing of obstructions; 6. The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure; 7. The destruction or alteration of the vegetation of wetlands, wildlife habitat areas, streams, or their buffers through clearing, harvesting, spraying of herbicides, shading, intentional burning, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a Critical . Area, provided that these activities are not part of a forest practice governed under Title 76.09 RCW and its rules; 8. Activities that result in a significant change of water temperature, a significant change of physical or chemical 267-18 (05/31/92) 20.15B.090 20.15B.090 B. Buffers. characteristics of water sources, including quantity, or 1. General. The City shall have the authority to require the introduction of pollutants including chemical buffers on Critical Areas dependent upon the sensitivity herbicides, fungicides, pesticides, or excess nutrients; of the Critical Area, the degree of anticipated impact, and and the proposed land use adjacent to the Critical Area. Buffer requirements for each specific type of Critical 9. Activities which bring a Critical Area which is not Area are contained within the Development Standards currently in existing or ongoing agricultural use, into Sections which follow. agricultural use. 2. Averaging. Standard Critical Area buffers may be 20 15B 090 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: GENERAL modified, by City Planning staff, on a case by case basis. Averaging buffer widths may be authorized only where the A. Any development proposal an a site which is within, includes, applicant demonstrates all of the following: or is adjacent to any Critical Area must be planned, designed and appropriately mitigated so as to demonstrate conformance a. That averaging is necessary to provide reasonable with the purposes of this Chapter. No alteration of a Critical use of the property; Area or its buffer shall be permitted unless the City grants an exception pursuant to Section 20.15B.040 or as provided below b. That the Critical Area contains variations in for the specific category of. Critical Area. sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics and that reduction from standard buffer widths will In addition, the following standards may be required for all occur only immediately next to the portion of the Critical Areas: Critical Area determined to be least sensitive; 1. Sequencing clearing and grading activities to minimize C. That low intensity land uses would be located areas of disturbance and allowing for clearing only during immediately next to areas where buffer width is the dry season of May 1 through September 30; reduced, and that such low intensity land uses are 2. Limiting vegetation removal and mandating vegetation guaranteed in perpetuity by covenant, deed restriction, easement, or other legally binding retention; mechanism; 3. Requiring temporary fencing of clearing limits around d. That width averaging will not adversely impact the Critical Areas and their buffers prior to any land Critical Areas' functional values; and clearing commencing on site; e. That the total area contained within the buffer 4. Requiring buffers established pursuant to the development after averaging is no less than that contained standards established by this Chapter; within the standard buffer prior to averaging. In no instance, except where a previously existing 5. Requiring additional building setbacks or the legal encumbrance exists, shall the buffer width be establishment of Critical Areas as natural open spaces; reduced to less than 50% of the standard buffer width required. 6. Limiting or reducing the types or densities of particular uses; When a buffer is reduced, a buffer enhancement plan using native vegetation and'fencing where appropriate must be 7. The preparation of specific site management plans for reviewed and submitted for the area of remaining buffer. temporary sedimentation, erosion control, or other The purpose of the buffer enhancement plan is to improve purposes; or the function of the buffer to provide adequate protection to the Critical Area. Site restoration to, at the least, the pre-existing •B. conditions. 3. Increasing. Standard buffers may be increased on a case -by -case basis when Planning Staff or their representative determines that a larger buffer is . necessary to protect the Critical Area functions and values known to be particularly sensitive to disturbance. (05/31/92) 267-19 267-20 (05/31/92) 20.15B.090 20.15B.100 A substantiated determination, prepared by staff or their representative, shall be attached as a permit condition and shall demonstrate that: a. A larger buffer is necessary to maintain viable populations of existing species; or b. The Critical Area is used by species proposed or listed by the federal government or the state as Endangered, Threatened, Rare, or Sensitive; that critical or outstanding potential habitat for those species is present; or that nesting sites such as heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees are present in the Critical Area or its buffer; or C. The Critical Areas located within 25 feet of the toe of slopes equal to or greater than 30%. Such buffers may be increased to include the top of slopes determined to be erosion hazards; or d. The land use which is proposed is incompatible with the Critical Area in question. C. Building Setback Lines. A building setback line of 15 feet is required from the edge of any buffer to prevent construction intrusions into the buffer. The setback shall be identified on the site plan which is filed as an attachment to the notice on title required by Section 20.15B.170(B). D. Authority to Condition or Deny. In addition to its general authority under this Chapter and any other applicable law or Chapter, the City may condition or deny a development proposal if it is determined that the development proposal will increase the potential of soil movement or otherwise result in an unacceptable risk of injury to persons or damage to the structure, site or adjacent properties; or will result in an unacceptable risk of significant harm to a Critical Area or its functional values. The City further shall have the authority to impose conditions for each Critical Area as provided in Sections 20.15B.090 through Section 20.15B.140. E. Construction Monitoring. The City may require that a qualified. Critical Area consultant, at the direction of the City, monitor the development proposal site during construction at the applicant's expense. The qualified Critical Area consultant shall monitor compliance with the conditions or restrictions imposed by the City Department of Community Development. The conditions imposed by the City may be based on the recommendations in the Critical Area Study conducted per the requirements of Section 20.15B.150 or a Mitigation plan conducted per the requirements of Section 20.15B.160. , (05/31/92) 267-21 The City may require the qualified Critical Area consultant to make written, dated monitoring reports on the progress of the construction at such timely intervals as may be specified. The City may require a final statement from the qualified Critical Area consultant that, in his or her professional opinion, based upon site observations and testing during the monitoring of the construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in the Critical Area study and all conditions of approval. F. Assurance Devices. The City may require appropriate assurance devises, such as performance bonds, in a form approved by the City attorney whenever the City determines that the public interest would not be served by the issuance of a permit in a Critical Area without some assurance of a means of providing for restoration of such areas or repair of property damage that may be caused by construction in such areas. Performance bonds may be required for an amount equal to 120% of the estimated costs of designing and constructing the required compensation. 201an 1n0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION ZONE These areas are to be conserved for the management and maintenance of fish and wildlife habitat. wildlife Habitat Conservation zones may overlap with other identified Critical Areas within the City of Edmonds. Likely areas of overlap include frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, streams, and wetlands. When fish and wildlife habitat zones overlap with other Critical Areas within the City of Edmonds, the development standards established for the overlapping Critical Area(s) shall apply. if multiple Critical Areas overlap in a zone, the most restrictive conditions shall apply. 20 151311n DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS Standards for Frequently Flooded Areas shall meet the requirements of Title 19.97, Flood Plain Management, of the City of Edmonds Community Development Code. 20,15B.120 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS A. General Standards. No alteration of an area of potential geologic instability or its buffer shall be allowed unless the City grants an exception pursuant to Section 20.15B.040 or the City finds: 1. There is no evidence of past instability or earth movement in the vicinity of the development proposal and quantitative analysis of slope stability presented by a qualified Critical Areas consultant indicates no 267-22 (05/31/92) 0 20.15B.120 20.158.120 significant risk to the development proposal or adjacent properties; or The area of potential geologic instability can be modified or the project can be designed so that any potential impact to the project or adjacent properties is eliminated or mitigated and the development proposal is certified as stable by a licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer. The development proposal should cause no increase in surface water discharge or sedimentation and should not decrease slope stability; or Timber harvest pursuant to a Washington State Department of Natural Resources approved forest practice permit may be allowed. Alteration of any geologically hazardous area which is authorized shall meet the following standards: 1. Clearing of vegetation is allowed only within the dry season, generally from May 1 through September 30; 2. only clearing necessary to install temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures for an approved development proposal prior to clearing for roadways, utilities, or storm drainage plan; 3. Clearing limits for roads, sewer, water, storm water or other utilities, and temporary erosion control facilities shall be marked in the field and approved by City staff prior to any alteration of existing vegetation or commencement of other site work; Clearing authorized for roads and utilities shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish the project specific engineering designs and shall remain within the field approved rights -of -way; No clearing of vegetation on lots or parcels will be allowed except that provided within approved rights -of -way identified above; and 6. In order to minimize impacts to critical Areas and the vegetation identified to be left remaining on .-site, clearing which is authorized may be required to be conducted pursuant to an approved clearing and skidding plan designed to minimize impacts to soil and understory vegetation by providing for sequencing and staging where appropriate. B. Buffers. Buffers for geologically hazardous areas shall be 50 feet in width, they shall be maintained with their native vegetation, and where appropriate, be placed within the Critical Areas tract. C. Erosion Hazard Areas. Alterations within identified Erosion hazard areas shall not be authorized without an approved Erosion control plan which includes staged clearing, where appropriate. Clearing or disruption of the soils within an Erosion hazard area shall be kept at the minimum necessary to provide reasonable use of the site. D. Landslide Hazard Areas. Landslide hazard areas located on slopes less than 30% shall only be approved to be altered if both of the following provisions are met: 1. Proposed development will not decrealse slope stability on any adjacent property, and 2. The landslide hazard to the project and adjacent property is eliminated or mitigated such that the proposed development on the site is certified as stable by a licensed professional geologist or geotechnical engineer. Any landslide hazard area and its buffer which combined are greater than 1 acre in size, shall be placed in a Critical Area tract for any proposed Master Plan Development, subdivision, short -subdivision, or Planned Residential Development, . pursuant to Section 20.15B.170. Where alterations are authorized City staff shall determine whether the remaining portion(s) of the landslide • hazard area shall be placed within a Critical Areas tract. Landslide areas located on slopes greater than 30% shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.15B.10(E). E. Steep Slope Hazard Areas. No development or alteration shall be allowed in steep slope hazard areas unless an exception is approved pursuant to Section 20.15B.040 or unless the development or alteration is one of the following: 1. Surface water conveyance designed to the best available technical standard, such as the Stormwater Management. Manual, approved by the .City. Installation shall absolutely minimize disturbance to the slope, soils, and vegetation; 2. Trails construction designed to the best available • technical standard approved by the City. Technical standards are provided in the U.S. Forest Service "Trails Management Handbook" (FSH 2309.18, 1987) and "Standard Specifications for Construction of Trails" (EM-7720-102, 1984). In no case shall trails be constructed of impervious materials which would contribute to surface (05/31/92) 267-23 267-24 (05/31/92) 20.15B.130 20.15B.130 water runoff, unless such materials are necessary to provide for soil stabilization or erosion control, and trail design assures that surface water runoff will not increase or contribute to erosion and sedimentation; Utility construction by private or public proponents may be allowed provided that City staff determines upon review of a Critical Area study that the proposed alteration shall not subject the steep slope to the risk of landslide or erosion; Trimming and limbing of vegetation on steep slopes may be provided if a clearing plan is provided for review and approval by the City and provided that the soils within the steep slope area are not disturbed to subject the area to the risk of erosion. Clearing shall be subject to the requirements of Title 18.45 of the ECDC; and Steep slopes of 30% or greater but with a vertical change of 20 feet or less may be exempted from the provisions of this section based on City staff review of a report prepared by licensed geologists or a geotechnical engineer which demonstrates that no adverse impacts will result from the proposed actions. Seismic Hazard Areas. Development proposals for sites containing a potential seismic hazard area shall only be authorized by staff to alter the seismic hazard area when the applicant documents that: A technical evaluation of the sites specific subsurface conditions indicates that the site is not located within a seismic hazard area; or 2. Mitigation is implemented which renders the proposed development as stable if it were not located within a seismic hazard area. City staff may rely upon independent review of the technical analysis of site conditions pursuant to Section 20.15B.150. 20.15B.130 STANDARDS: STREAMS No alteration to a stream or buffer shall be permitted unless the City grants an exception pursuant to Section 20.15B.040 or unless one of the following applies. In all cases of stream alteration, crossing, or proposed work within the channel all City, state, and federal regulations shall apply. Based on the definitions within Section 20.15B.020, the City of Edmonds, at the time of adoption of this Chapter does not contain any Class 1 streams; language regarding these streams are present in order to regulate those Class (05/31/92) 267-25 1 streams which the City may at some point incorporate into its jurisdiction. A. Stream Crossings. For Category 1 streams, crossings may be allowed only if all reasonable construction techniques and best management practices are used to avoid disturbance to the stream bed or bank. 'Upon completion of construction, the area affected shall be restored to an appropriate grade, replanted with native species and/or otherwise protected according to a plan approved by the planning official, and maintained and monitored per the requirements of Section 20.15B.160(B). For all Categories of streams, the applicant must demonstrate that best management practices will be used during construction to provide the following: 1. Fisheries protection, including no interference with fish migration or spawning; 2. All crossings shall be constructed during summer low flow periods and shall be timed to avoid stream disturbance during periods when stream use is critical to salmonids; 3. Crossings shall not occur over salmonid spawning areas • unless no other possible crossing site exists; 4. Crossings and culverted portions of the stream shall be minimized to the extent feasible and serve multiple _ purposes and multiple lots whenever possible; 5. Roads may cross streams only on previously approved rights -of -way, provided no practical alternative exists and adequate provision is made to protect and/or enhance the stream through appropriate mitigation. Roads shall be designed and ,located to conform to topography, and maintained to prevent erosion and restriction of the - natural movement of groundwater as it affects the stream; 6. Roads and utilities shall be designed in conjunction, to minimize the area of disturbance to the stream; and 7. Roads shall be constructed so as to minimize adverse impacts on the hydrologic quality of the stream or associated habitat to a degree acceptable to the City. B. Stream Relocations. Relocation of a stream to provide greater reasonable use of a property shall only be authorized under the following conditions: • 1. Category 1 streams shall not be relocated; 267-26 (05/31/92) 20.158.130 20.158.140 2. Category 2 streams shall not be relocated except for 2• Limiting vegetation removal and mandating vegetation public road projects which have been authorized by the retention; exception process set out in Section 20.15B.040; and 3. Requiring buffers established pursuant to the development 3. Category 3 streams may be relocated under a mitigation standards established by this Title; plan for the purpose of enhancement of in -stream resources 4. Requiring additional building setbacks or the provided all appropriate floodplain protection measures are used, and the requirements of the Stormwater establishment of Critical Areas Tracts and/or native Management Manual, and all other applicable permit and growth protection easements pursuant to Section code requirements have been met. 20.15B.170; C. Trails. After reviewing the proposed development and technical 5. Limiting or reducing the types or densities of particular reports, City Planning staff may determine that a p y g y pedestrian - uses; only trail may be allowed in the outer 25% of a stream buffer, provided non impervious surface materials are used, all 6. Requiring the preparation of specific site management appropriate provision is made to protect water quality, and all plans for temporary sedimentation, erosion control, or applicable permit requirements have been met. No motorized other purposes; or vehicles shall be allowed within a stream or its buffer except 7. Requiring site restoration. as required for necessary maintenance or security. Vegetative edges, structural barriers, signs or other measures must be provided wherever necessary to protect streams by limiting G. Buffers: Streams. Buffers for streams shall be measured on access to designated public use or interpretive areas. Access each side of the stream, from the top of the bank. The areas must incorporate design features and materials which following are the standard buffers for streams: protect water quality and allow adequate surface and groundwater movement, and must be located so as not to disturb Category 1 streams and Category 2 streams with salmonids shall nesting, breeding, and rearing areas. have a 50 foot buffer. D. Stream Channel Stabilization. Stream channel stabilization may Category 2 streams shall have a 25-foot buffer.. be allowed only when movement of the stream channel threatens existing residential or commercial structures, public Category 3 streams shall have a 10-foot buffer. improvements, unique natural resources, or the only possible existing access to a legal lot. Channel stabilization must be 20.15B.140 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: WETLANDS done in compliance with the provisions of this Title and other applicable City, state and federal codes and regulations. Alteration to wetlands and their buffers shall only be allowed E. Drainage Ditch Maintenance. When drainage ditches that carry pursuant to the provisions of Section 20.15B.040. Any authorized salmonids are maintained it shall be conducted with the use of alteration a wetland must follow the prescribed sequencing of best management practices developed in consultation with mitigation ass outlined in Section 20.158.160 of this Title. Impacts resource agencies with expertise and/or jurisdiction. These to wetlands or their buffers shall be compensated for at the features may be regulated as Category 2 streams pursuant to the replacement ratios specified in Sections .130(D), and pursuant requirements of this Chapter. to compensatory mitigation plan as required wthin Section 20.15B. red within F. Development Conditions. Conditions on development proposals A. Alterations. involving streams and their associated buffers may include, 1. Category 1 Wetlands. among other things, the following, provided, nothing herein shall be construed to otherwise limit the City's authority to impose conditions designed to meet the and objectives No alteration to Category 1 wetlands shall be authorized . purposes of this Title: unless as exempted within Section 20.156.040 or excepted for substantiated. reasonable use within section 1. Sequencing clearing and grading activities to minimize 20.15B.040(C). Category 1 wetlands or their buffers shall areas of disturbance; not be used for stormwater management purposes including engineered retention/detention or constructed (05/31/92) 267-27 267-28 (05/31/92) 20.15B.140 20.15B.150 biofiltration features such as bio-swales. Conveyance of pre-treated stormwater may be allowed to pass through the buffer into the Category 1 wetland if the manner of conveyance mimics that found in the natural buffer condition, i.e. infiltration and/or sheet flow. Category 2 Wetlands. No alteration to Category 2 wetlands shall be authorized unless as exempted within Section 4.0.0 or excepted for substantiated reasonable use within section 4.3.0. Category 2 wetlands shall not be used for stormwater management purposes including retention/detention unless such use is part of a publicly designed and funded program to control identified stormwater problems for the greater public good or a program installed pursuant to a private development permit which is constructed to public standard, consistent with city policy such as a basin study and dedicated to and accepted for public use. When use of Category 2 wetlands for retention/detention purposes is authorized, all requirements of the Stormwater Management Manual shall be met, and the proposal and design is in compliance with the latest findings of the Puget Sound Wetlands Research Project, and the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of City Planning staff that no adverse impacts will occur to the functional values of the wetland. Treatment of stormwater for water quality concerns shall not be allowed within the buffers of Category 2 wetlands. Conveyance of stormwater may be allowed through the buffer if upon review of the project design, staff determines that the proposed conveyance method poses a minimum risk to the function and value of the buffer and no adverse impacts are posed to the wetland itself. 3. Category 3 Wetlands. The following use for stormwater management and conveyance shall apply: vegetation -lined swales designed for stormwater management may be placed within the outer 25% of the buffer when topographic restraints determine there are no other upland alternative locations. Swales used for conveyance of stormwater may be placed through the buffer only if that is shown to be the most effective and nonimpacting manner to convey pre-treated stormwater into the wetland. Category 3 wetlands shall not be used for the treatment of stormwater for water quality. Wetland Edge Delineation. The Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1989) shall be used for conducting wetland delineations for the requirements of this Title. Data collected during a delineation study shall be included as part of the wetland study requirements for Section 20.15B.150(C). Required Buffers: Standard. The following buffers shall be required for wetlands based on the Category of wetland as outlined in Section 20.15B.070(A)(5) of this Title. The City may allow buffer averaging per the requirements and limitations within Section 20.15B.090(B)(2). Buffer conditions shall prohibit or limit the removal or alteration of existing vegetation in the buffer areas as necessary to preserve the functions of the wetland. Any disturbance of the buffer areas shall be replanted with a diverse plant community of native vegetation appropriate for the site approved by the City. Category 1 100 foot Category 2 50 foot Category 3 25 foot D. Replacement Ratios. Any person who alters or proposes to alter a wetland or its buffers shall restore or create equivalent or greater areas of wetland or buffer than those altered in order to compensate for wetland or buffer losses. The following ratios apply to creation or restoration which is in -kind, on -site, and timed prior to or concurrent with alteration. These ratios do not apply to remedial actions resulting from illegal alterations. The first number specifies the acreage of wetlands requiring replacement (created) and the second specifies the acreage of wetlands altered (lost). Category 1: 6:1 Category 2: forested 3:1 shrub 2:1 emergent 1.5:1 Category 3: 1.25:1 20,15B.150 CRITICAL AREA STUDIES A. Required. When an application for a development proposal on a site that includes, is adjacent to, or could significantly impact a Critical Area is proposed, City staff shall require the submission of a Critical Area study, prepared by a qualified consultant, pursuant to the requirements of Section 20.15B.150. Staff shall make a determination whether the development proposal site includes, is adjacent to, or faces potentially significant impacts to a Critical Area or its buffer. That determination shall be rebuttable and the (05/31/92) 267-29 267-30 (05/31/92) • 20.15B.150 20.15B.160 decision of the Director or Building Official that any area lies within a Critical Area or its buffer shall be appealable as a staff decision in accordance with provisions of ECDC 20.105.010 (A)(3). waivers. When staff determines, based on review of the Critical Area Checklist, a preliminary field investigation, and the review of technical information available to staff, that: 1. There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter; 2. The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of this Chapter; and 3. The development proposal meets the minimum standards of this Chapter; then 4. Staff may waive the requirement for a more detailed Critical Area study. In no case may staff waive the need for a detailed Compensatory Mitigation Plan if Critical Area impacts*are identified, unless the applicant is proposing to use a plan already reviewed and approved by staff which meets the criteria and standards of this Chapter. C. Critical Area Studies: Contents. when it is determined by the staff of the City that a Critical Area study is required for a development activity proposal, the minimum criteria for study content specific to each Critical Area type will be required. Detailed criteria will be provided within the Administrative Rules for this Chapter. When proposing compensatory mitigation designs, additional detailed studies will be required. D. City Approved 2Critical Areas Consultant. Promptly following the effective date of this ordinance, and at the beginning of every calendar year thereafter, the City shall issue a Request for qualifications and Proposals from qualified Critical Areas technical consultants for the purpose of identifying qualified consultants for the City. An applicant may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the City's approved list in preparing Critical Area studies per the requirements of this Chapter or may apply to utilize an alternative consultant. If an alternative consultant is approved he/she should be added to the approved list. An alternative consultant shall meet all criteria for inclusion on the City's list of approved consultants. The applicant, the consultant, and the City shall enter into a three party contract for the purpose of conducting (05/31/92) 267-31 the Critical Areas study. All costs associated with the Critical Area study shall be born by the applicant. Independent Review. Based on a review of the information contained in the Critical Area study and the conditions of the development proposal site, the planning official may require independent review of any such study. This independent review shall be performed by a qualified technical consultant selected by the City and paid for by the City. The purpose of such independent review is to provide the City with objective technical assistance in evaluating the accuracy -of submitted reports and/or the effects on Critical Areas which may be caused by a development proposal and to facilitate the decision -making process. Staff may have technical assistance provided by appropriate resource agency staff if such assistance is available in a timely manner. 20.15B.160 MITIGATION Mitigation Sequence. As defined in this Chapter mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing or compensating for adverse impacts to a Critical Area or its buffer. When a proposed development activity poses potential adverse impacts to a Critical Area or its buffer the following prioritized sequence of mitigation shall be followed: 1. Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the affected environment; 4. Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; 5. Compensate for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and 6. Monitor the impact and the compensation project and taking appropriate corrective measures. B. Compensatory Mitigation. As a condition of any permit allowing • alteration of a Critical Area or its buffer, or as an enforcement action pursuant to Section 20.15B.180(B), the City shall require that the applicant shall provide compensatory mitigation in the form of restoration or creation of the Critical Area and its buffer in order to offset the impacts 267-32 (05/31/92) 20.15B.170 resulting from the applicant's or violator's actions. The minimum overall goal of compensatory mitigation shall be no net loss of the function and size of the Critical Area. Enhancement of existing significantly degraded wetlands or streams may be considered for partial compensation. when enhancement of an existing significantly degraded wetland or stream is proposed as compensation for the loss of existing functional wetland or stream, the replacement ratios as provided within Section 20.15B.140(D) shall be doubled. Compensation shall be completed prior to wetland or stream alteration, where possible. Compensatory mitigation for streams, wetlands, and wildlife habitat conservation areas shall follow an approved compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to Section 20.15B.160, with the replacement ratios specified in Section 20.15B.140(D) and shall meet the following minimum performance standards: 1. The proposed Compensatory Mitigation will establish quantifiable goals and objectives in order for the City to determine the success of the plan over time in order to release performance bonds or require contingency actions if necessary; The Compensatory Mitigation will be conducted on property, demonstrated by the applicant, to be able to be protected and managed to avoid further development or degradation, and to provide for long-term preservation of the compensation; and The applicant and their representatives shall demonstrate sufficient scientific expertise, supervisory capability, and financial resources, including bonding, to carry out the project; and demonstrate the capability for monitoring the site and to make corrections during this period if the project fails to meet projected goals. 20.15B.170 CRITICAL AREA TRACTS AND NOTICE ON TITLE Critical Area Tracts. The City may require that where development or alteration is prohibited or limited based on the presence of a Critical Area or its buffer, pursuant to this ordinance, the Critical Area and/or its buffer may be placed in a separate Critical Area Tract or Easement. The City may require that the Critical Area tract be designated as a Native Growth Protection Easement. Appropriate survey markings and permanent signage shall be installed on the property at the boundary of the Critical Area and/or the buffer. Such requirements, if any, shall be included as conditions of approval. (05/31/92) 267-33 20.15B.180 Notice on Title. The owner of any property that is subject to the provisions of this ordinance shall, as a condition of approval pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance, record with the Records and Elections Division of Snohomish County a notice in a form approved by the City providing notice of the presence of a Critical Area or buffer on the property, the application of this ordinance to the property, and that limitations on actions in or affecting such areas or buffers may exist. The form of such notice may be adopted by administrative rule. 20 15B 180 ADMINISTRATION Variances. Variances from the standards of this Title may be authorized by the Hearing Examiner in accordance with the procedures set forth in Edmonds Community Development Chapter 20.85. In granting such a variance, the Hearing Examiner shall find: 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or issurroundings, or the size or nature of the Critical Area, the strict application of this Title would deprive the subject property all reasonable use of the property. 2. The granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the development proposal and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated, or contrary to the goals and purposes of this Chapter. Enforcement Penalties. Any violation of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a public nuisance subject to abatement and a misdemeanor subject to penalty of a fine of up to $500 and/or imprisonment for 90 days or will be subject to civil penalties pursuant to Title 20.110 of the ECDC. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense. The planning official or his or her designee shall have a right to enter upon any property at reasonable times and to make such inspection necessary to determine compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. If the property is occupied, the planning official shall make reasonable effort to locate the owner or person in charge to request entry. The planning official is further authorized to take such actions as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this Chapter. . Appeals. Any decision to require a Critical Area study pursuant to this Chapter may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code. Any decision to approve, condition or deny a development proposal based on the requirements of this Title may be appealed in 267-34 (05/31/92) 20.15B.190 accordance with the appeal procedures and standards applicable to the subject development proposal permit or approval. If there are no applicable appeal procedures elsewhere in the Edmonds Community Development Code, then any final decision of the Hearing Examiner may be appealed to the City Council upon filing a Notice of Appeal with the clerk of the City Council within ten (10) days after the date of making the written Hearing Examiners' decision. Such appeal to the council shall be on the record. 20 15B.190 SEVE If any provision of this Chapter or its application to any person or property is held invalid, the remainder of the Chapter or the application of the provision to other persons or property shall not be affected. 20.15B.200 LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION This Chapter shall be liberally construed to give full effect to the _ objectives and purposes for which it was enacted. (Ord. 2874 §1, 1992) • i (05/31/92) 267-35 0 *STREET FILE C O TY OF EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (206) 771.3202 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Administration — 250 • 5th Avenue North Maintenance & Operations — 200 Dayton Street September 28, 1983 Mr. Nicholas Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Kairez: SUBJECT: REDUCTION IN WATER BILL - ACCOUNT #207-15500 This letter is in regard to your request for another reduction in your water bill. On July 1, 1983, the City gave you a credit of $228.54 and on September 10, 1983, you received a credit of $90.95 for a total of $329.49. You were informed by way of a door hanger and also verbally by Lee Willeiksen of our Water/Sewer Division that you had a leak which entitled you to these credits. The City cannot give you another credit, but we will make arrangements for you to pay the bill in two payments. Please contact our Utility Billing Office at 771-3051 to make these arrangements. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Acting Supt. of Public Works BRM/ml cc: Finance Dept. UTILITYSERVICE ORDREVIOUS ACCOUNT p PDAT NEW DELETE METER N WRITTEN BY zzi REQUESTED BY'l - TODAYS�TE RRENT ACCOUNT a o �101-A-IA�A�l SERVICE ADDRESS WATER SERVICE DATE LOCATION OF METER ❑ START T/ ❑ TURN OFF El CLOSING (FLO) yOTHER EREAD ❑ NEW METER ❑ LOCK ❑ UNLOCK SIZE RESIDENTIAL PREV READ DATE PREVIOUS READ CONSUMPTION UNITS SEWER ❑ AVAILABLE ❑ UNAVAILABLE l-ti.7 DATE r—'� METER CHARGE $ CONNECTION STREET CUT TOTAL $ I =�� CURR READ DATE CURRENT READ76 READ BY NOTES c CLOSING BILL Th. . n n ur_ , I r.a n-e �s �-��GSe�CLOSING BILL AMOUNTS NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY,--- rl STATE I I ? V V RCD 1 MUN ACCT SPEC CC O I^ LOCATION OF METE CONN WAIL RCD 2 CUSIOMLRNAMI: SERVICE AD[ BUILDING NO MAILINL: ADDRESS U RCD 3 CUR READ DALE CURB READ CONSUMPTION HISTORY / I yUp i I(J 1LD�L,_ / PRV t PRV 2 PqV 7 PRV A JPRV 6 PRV 6 PREVIOUS BAL. $ FINAL W S U M SUE $ �.V / STATE I I hereby apply for the use of water in accordance with all rules and regulations of the City Water Department and the Edmonds City Code. This form properly executed and signed by the owner or his agent and filed with the Edmonds Water Department constitutes a proper notice of change of occupancy or mailing address for the property herein described. ALL BILLS ARE DUE AND PAYABLE 25 DAYS AFTER BILLING DATE. x We MAINTENANCE Lll1L1 IL.Lil'40 �EBIT/ R �DADJUSTMENTS • . DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) ACCOUNT NUMBER ,2 tj 7- CURRENT WATER SURCHARGE UTILITY MISC. DEBIT(+) CREDII(- WATER PREVIOUS #1 SURCHARGE DATE UTILITY MM/DD MISC. I DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) "'T'vwl PREVIOUS #2 SURCHARGE DATE UTILITY MM/DD MISC. PREPAYMENT AMOUNT TOTAL 61 f, DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) C?a vpJ. CONSUMPTION AMOUNT LID 7-,L -,1 31 SUPPLIER n DATE SIGNED -- UI1 U1LL1110 DEBIT CREDIT ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNT NUMBER D — Sllt� CURRENT n WATER SURCHARGE UTILITY WATER PREVIOUS #1 SURCHARGE DATE UTILITY MM/DD MISC. WATER PREVIOUS #2 SURCHARGE DATE UTILITY MM/DD DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) �J 1Jtb i I M UtU I I ( - DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) DEBIT(+) CREDIT(-) PREPAYMENT AMOUNT TOTAL Fa.. CONSUMPTION AMOUNT FC M-LANATION Zx::rti F A. vQ��r•�..� >UPPLIER f-4-- DATE SIGNED �; L— Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: OE-t 1 Site Information (soils/topogra by/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 1 d rn P1 U V t 6 (4) Y' , 2. Property Tax Account Number: '� 2'1O 1+30 D02 002 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4' 4D Q Gr 4. Is this site currently developed? _,yes; no. Ic If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. - Site contains areas of year-round standing water: k) O : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: N ;Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodphdn of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flowq across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? N / Flows are seasonal? NG A (What time of year? N 4 ), 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs : mixed ✓ urban landscaped (lawn mbs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N O Critical Areas Checklistdoc/3.19.2001twA , , City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing 'a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADDlicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: Name C?ll1 0 Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklistdoc/3.19.2001 Critical Areas Checklist CAFileNo: 02-12 Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) r 1. Site Address/ Location: _ 1 , H mY t o V t e o , 2. Property Tax Account Number: 1210 W5 O 001 00 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): W 4- 0-&r 4. Is this site currently developed? _yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6.- Site contains areas of year-round standing water. : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: N ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodphdn of a water course. 9. Site contams a creek or an area where water flo q across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? rJ Flows are seasonal. P1 A(What time of ye.? N 4 ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawnshrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N 0 Critical Areas Checidist.doe/3.19.2001 4? "t t A '4C. 189� City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADDlicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: G eor�l� re�z Name Qtl1 Street Address 104 City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Check1ist.doc/3.19.2001 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: Site Information (soils/topogrWHI hy/hydrology/vegetation) r 1. Site Address/Location: Ot,qrnptu ut e 0 , 2. Property Tax Account Number: 1$'L- 1 O 42 DO I O-O 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? _yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 4 -b a.Gre-, 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15 % (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). . Other (please describe): 6.• Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 1J O : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains. areas of seasonal standing water: N v ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flowq across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? N/ Flows are seasonal? N6A (What time of year? fj4 ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawnshrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N O Critical Areas Checklistdoc/3.19.2001 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing 'a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADDlicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, - must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information famished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: G eorate� Ka i re�z Name Ql(1 CrJ Street Address 'V1E11'ltS LQA City State Zip DATE Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City IState Zip Telephone: Telephone: Email address (optional): Email Address (optional): Critical Areas ChecklisGdoc/3.19.2001 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: DI'l4 Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: i 1 C)LwKV to ul e Lk) r , 2. Property Tax Account Number: l 3 Z1 D 3 1 601 0 p 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? _yes; no. 1C If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: k) o : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: N 0 ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodphdn of a water course. 9. Site con a creek or an area where water flowq across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? N Flows are seasonal? N6A (What time of year? " 4 ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawnshrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N O Critical Areas Checklistdoc/3.19.2001 Of EDA fL City of Edmonds (P Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 lac I gqo Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing 'a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADDlicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: G eorAe,, Name Rll'1 Street Address LoAr City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City IState Zip Telephone: Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklistdoc/3.19.2001 City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: 18 -1(, Issue Date —, D A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: ©. V► Ot B. Type of Work (be specific): 4 i, de V L C. Contractor: ANA . ROLC Coo. L.L C Contact: k e-03 �c lMa,Llt MailingAddress: fOI y 1-hS ( LA (LtQ4- Phone: .3(a © (o 7 1 01 6O 201- • State License #: & N A 11 im 4 %Lr3 to PLr Liability Insurance: Bond: S 60,o O, " D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes []No G: Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. . A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: or Agent) Date: z-- Lz-_�?z CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY ^^�� APPROVED BY: �� RIGHT OF WAY FEE: t✓ DU TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER e.ZP71t%C>F h*4. - DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I 1 l: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION T OTAL RECEIPT NO.: i 19 1 +01 ISSUED FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ,�, y `o•,�4 - CITY OF EDMONDS STREET ADDRESSAFXRFFAHEY MAYOR 7110-210TH ST.S.W. • EDMONDS, WA 98026 • (206) 771-0235 • FAX (206) 744-6057 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Fst. 1890 July 30, 1996 Mrs. Nicholas Kairez P.O. Box 1154 Lynnwood, WA 98046-1154 Subject: Water Leak Credit at 9117 Olympic View Dr. (236775) Dear Mrs. Kairez: I have reviewed your account and will allow a credit from April through June 1996 billing in accordance with our City policy. The policy states that the customer will be billed at the retail rate based upon the average water consumption for the same period during the previous year. In addition, the excess water lost from the leak will be billed to customer at the City's wholesale rate with a 15% surcharge added for administrative cost. Only one leak credit will be granted in any three year period. Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new billing, please contact Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk, at 771-0241. Sincerely, i Ron Holland Water/Sewer Supervisor RH/lk cc: Ilene Larson Utility Billing Clerk wordata\water\credit96\#236775 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan FM.SE ...�: CITY CFEMIN :"''�'`�-•,.� ,.�4^ �'� LAURA M. HALL E 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT J p Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering September 23, 1994 M-6.), J %Ig-3 Craig Campbell Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. 19400 - 33rd Ave. W. Suite 200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Dear Mr. Craig, Your request for deviation from the City's detention storage requirement for the subject plat is denied. Attached is information regarding previous problems (flooding, washout, erosion) with the downstream storm system. High velocities in this system due to the slope could cause similar washouts in the future if storm rates are not controlled. ' Craig, we have serious concerns about another pipeline paralleling the sewer pipeline on the bluff. Any failure of the new pipeline or damage to the sewer pipeline will have very serious consequences. I realize your firm has liability insurance and you would be liable for a failure. I would think you would keep the risk to a minimum. Being involved in a problem five (5) years or more would not be in anyone's best interest later if the design and construction of their facility is left to a failure or damage. You and your firm's liability will stay with you the life of the facility. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer DF/RJA/sf Attachment KAIREZ. DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CNRON COPY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 13, 1994 MEMO TO: Edmonds Planning Division FROM: 0, Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed 15-Lot Subdivision at 9117 Olympic View Drive Attached is a letter from Mr. Linton, a homeowner downstream of the proposed subject development. Due to prior problems with flooding and erosion on his property, Mr. Linton would prefer that stormwater from the proposed development bypass the system which goes through his lot. However, this is not feasible due to the steep slopes on the Kairez property. Because of the existing high rates of flow in the storm system and the difficulty of maintaining the system, it appears that the best and most appropriate method for handling stormwater from the new development is to detain the water in an underground pipe or vault and release it at the predeveloped rate. Allowing the stormwater to pass the site uncontrolled would create higher rates of flow which could result in a washout similar to that which occurred previously. DF/cmc Enclosure OVDSBDV.DOC LINTON INDUSTRIES INC. 6306 202nd Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (206) 774-7787 Fax: (206) 672-8940 August 16, 1994 City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Jeffrey S. Wilson Dear Sir: UST'. I am in receipt of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed 15 lot subdivision located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. I currently own the property directly to the north of the subdivision shown as Lot 36 and 37and my residence at 17802 Talbot Road. , With respect to the preliminary site plan on file at the City of Edmonds planning division, I have great concerns to the proposed storm retention design. In February of 1967, due to heavy rainfall, water run off coming from property above and including the proposed 15 lot subdivision, saturated the around and a large landslide on Lot 37 occurred. The resulting slide blocked the railroad tracks and ended up in Puget Sound. The City, in an effort to prevent this from recurring, installed a 24" storm pipe through Lot 37. It is my concern that an open retention pond, large enough to handle this size subdivision{ to happen again. not properly designed or maintained, will create conditions that will allow this washout Further, the existing storm system manhole located on Lot 37, which would receive the run-off from the retention pond, currently appears to be running at near capacity during heavy rainfall. Steep terrain, dense landscape, rockery walls, and retaining walls all make maintenance of the existing storm line on Lot 37 very difficult. PRECISION ANO GEV -RAL METAL FABRICATION It would be my recommendation to: (A) If site water retention is necessary, that a design using the concrete vault method with an overflow draining to the west side of the site be used. (B) Capping the existing system at Lot 37. Intersecting the existing line south of Lot 37, and connecting it to the new subdivision storm system sized to handle the increased loads. And routing the outfall line down the slope on the west side of( the site, running parallel to the railroad tracks at that elevation, and tying into the existing manhole that currently drains under the tracks to Puget Sound. The existing line entering this manhole would remain to handle the storm sewer loads from Lot 36 and 37, and Talbot Road. If designed in this manner, site storm retention may -not be necessary.- 1 would be most happy to meet someone from the engineering division, or a representative from Lovell-Sauerland & Associates,' site to better explain my concerns. IF V Rob t Linton 774-7 7 RL:rab cc: Don Fiene 1Y. Lovell-Sauerl.�. FILE ■ ■ & Associates, Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants RFC' f~ 1 w./ M n Up 2 0 1994 t" GINEERid'VG Attn: Bob Alberts City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave Edmonds, WA 98020 19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 .(206) 775-1591 Seattle: (206) 340-0830 FAX: (206) 672.7998 September 16, 1994 LSA File No. 2926 Subject: Proposed Preliminary Plat of Kairez Vista (P-93-216); Detention Storage requirements Dear Mr. Alberts: To date the preliminary plat process for. Kairez Vista has not resolved the issue of detention storage to the mutual satisfaction of the City and the developer. Toward that end, the following discussion is an amplification of information we have previously presented. Hopefully this information will provide sufficient justification for the City to eliminate detention as a requirement of development. Chapter 18 of the Community Development Code for the City of Edmonds provides the guidance for application of drainage rules.and regulations. Its stated purpose (paraphrasing section 18.30.000) is to maintain high quality:; surface water by'�. protecting it from pollution, to protect 'land:: near development from higher runoff rates' Which might cause erosion or flooding, to protect, private -and- public property from flooding or. erosion; 'and to` promote development practices' to' assure these - purposes are met. Also, Section 18.30.040 H. allows deviations from the requirements of the code, based on the capacity and condition of downstream facilities, the effect on receiving bodies of water, damage from on -site disposal of water, existence of regional detention facilities, or major difficulties in maintaining the drainage system. The downstream drainage situation for this project was previously discussed in a Lovell-Sauerland report dated April 23rd, 1993. It indicated that all runoff from the proposed project would drain into an existing piped system which drains about 130 acres of the City directly into Puget Sound. This 130 acre basin was discussed in detail by URS Consultants in 1989 in a study prepared for the City in 1989 titled "Edmonds Drainage Basin Studies". The study indicated that the pipe system affected by the project would only ever be used at about 65 percent of its "open channel" capacity of 95 cfs. Also, since upstream elements of this system have a much lower capacity, and a major part of the basin is already developed without detention, it is highly unlikely that the total excess capacity will ever be needed for other projects further upstream. Referring back to the purpose and intent of the drainage code, it is evident that the project will not expose nearby. land to higher runoff --it will actually reduce the effects on nearby land. It will - not expose private or public property to flooding or erosion --as the'downstream system is under utilized. It will not adversely affect the ' downstream receiving body --Puget Sound has infinite capacity to receive stormwater. y Bob Alberts City of Edmonds Page 2 Other jurisdictions recognize the sense of allowing direct discharge to nearby receiving bodies of water. Both City of Bellevue and King County allow direct discharge of uncontrolled runoff when the downstream conveyance system is adequate. Other municipalities have similar policies and exemptions. The DOE Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin requires runoff volume control specifically and only for "streambank erosion control." It is recognized that each jurisdiction also has a responsibility to protect conveyance systems, but in this case there is no capacity problem and no streambank to be eroded or to protect from project impacts. In light of the above discussion, we are requesting a deviation from the City's customary practice of mandating detention storage. If this request is denied, we also ask that the denial be in written form giving reasons as required in section 18.30.040 H of the Edmonds Code. Please let us know if you require further information on this to reach your decision. cc: Paul Moore Sincerely, Craig Campbell, P.E. �b #Y,��.f"5� i' /�.. �•1. �y,. ,� }-. ` j , a. it i ' f ':R i � y t.)r r'+}�,,}�tr +'•`+ ` 6 sib �, r, a{�1.� � • nn"`,`�,;f�•°y .. i'•. t {� t ':: �t�' � •j, r'�< _ ti'�' . � its t? 4 t < ,• , l :rx,• � t I//' jt;,4 �•�{/ r r'rt 'r. {t•T' �S.A1..L2.�.-'�4• t Y..r� _s .s .ems r��tt .' � V.r. %r ,+ 4+J(f r t a 1ci,. \ mat t .'A ;s� \- $ 'tJ•' - t 'F 1- `f '° r. 'r�Z.V � `� ^ate \ t. *� � 1r � "} •.A t' •i f .} i a ! i u >`.�d d ��� d �' .a h.. -. t , `` C'--����f •i '-. � • ' J � ' ,a`\ t r' ,,,� r" � •. •- / ,� a- b �•,' -"" 4 =+��' v. �-_ .fti'1 �C � i. ;�y F ty i�, Z ,,�rr��•\��bt!';'''�5�v' "�r'rh, �r �. J,r rf �� a ,, i, } afi. � t 4 .f YL , / " 3 '-.-�;� '' s � ` Kt r2 . � ^s � s `� ��� � �• �, ��t✓s,},�� a , t,. I i-•.. '.�"„-���`C'�... � � - i��3't�.l � , �:� � �E�'t �-,..,,�,, 1"y t,; 1 ,} • 9a ts'��p" r}� �+-i f :,.... rr'>�;. t,.y•_y II` 'a. •`?� ,t• :g l ;� �'J r ��t's fn A1 �Lr�`' J P �\ �• .a 2 Y ..o•.-'-�su•-,+':,a ��pr V 1t.yi (i V � `�� 2 J S c�.r ... Ir °,.;� � -QF /'!! r'x i +'rf -�r JY A F � 1 � � }�,�i�j' r!'f,' r y .:' •. • . it �a3La /Y r��t."r''"'";'L•.-%`�l .r>{i�L- ,.t��'' (/j,t Byrd j'�, {, ,-+�f � �'__ `1 t.-�.� t `. -i.? 'may =.t�`ry,��Y)d�l`i+J ^}��:. i t 4' ? 1 i ! 1'/ k 1. � } .. a: ,� • '+�n.r�. f�" .r Y y t .• rr•'a� rtV•. � 'r-���'S' . + Fj,' �'$a ) ,�'" t1,� . .! S �f �± i ��" 3A4aS J r't 'V rr w�f •--C"i�`"a 1 t. 4 t , .�' h ,Y Js �.• �.r :- ./'� � tqZ/y�.,C s/,��; �r ,1 � .ra � �: (f 5�c r• �''w,h S' '� 5, { n� fw 2, 1� � r r .:i Ll. Y S �2'• � :-.# t f 4'Y ' �5 t � Si �` � � Y i; -+' J c 1 t �' is � ,4s r..' , • . . Y r t t, as ��lt+.•"i, ,a/a�;O-4}M _d.r,n! �,� ,�.` µ• .T't,t'I+„` .+�` h•(rn' ri�••,�,, F t '�1r�r.rCr rrfr y,, -u.��� �.r�t ^ ,.:. :•+-., � . S'�''i4 :Uy! .2,xrs i•_cI 't '+�, .r �" f t r1 t� sEind {tT�•jx �'.. `. i' ro�), ••�}{1%L•.gly<'ra'�`Fs,,:��t'r i,rl,,Va 4�a , �!�'.���1,3��i' t .y Yh,?+n.fiy t i•,?y,;'N 3yit.��.. t {t"! ti y iYa `i, r'+ G � rrkyi,'• ✓1 ;i`7r �•� `, l y./ 'i�,z���i'','f Qi'�(y0 VC ii•\, �� 'r'�I'�� 7 Gar t S� �,',� �;�`�! tt ` `+ . d ,, ! , } t • t�` '� a ,u'�.� '>'a `• 1•. .).- � t:tt',� � �.q� �'; mot„ 1) •�ffi L r �, A 45J1 �tr'� k•y�4� � ri�J �a���titt4:� + y'i (' r t,.:,�J �%�'� �?��,V �l,�.y rti^i4 ,1 i•6i '�'!S �t '� J . }M Y•i'ati'�(` `tea' �� t� �}t {a; 'ti tYi��;� 1 ... / J� N Siil�`�'' )' jtcri`}� -i G1, ta64 a�4 �pf 1y' 1 iF `r i s)`nV 3 r> , ' 1'• gA(�'.,tS E t)p. a �.S t,�1 t }..,h' ay r r u.;•-+ ti � , I � .. ` � 7 _ '., y •�,:�- �„ � � � hr .., .k � >i� . J,i , r 'A�D Y4D 't (�{)�A��: by(�t a• r ,1t'ta:,�r a` ° gip!" :., .. �<+yr 9Y"+ a t �"+ 1< iris �,�,..�;•�`1`�{,�.°�^b •t `,ryy'y �v tnA R �l/ � f :•� -• ?'"� ,T f � 1 �� /' 1 - � �c � � .if Ri�* t �rJl; Fy a p i t).,•i,3', t1t\ If r5 X p ♦ 5 1a t' .r"'• , i j'rA"' y, -^Th`� .n r '! ti•� tt�j}•� , f ( 1 . a � C t Y•i) � Lip+,�,� T' ; , t ,i.-,,� . 4 �.. �':,+.� ta��4.`' �;r,,,�,,. / >> f'�,.a'rs� Ylrg^:gip t3 C M f i' 1/F(� •c ( 1 , ..� t 4r�+ (\ �� V,�, •! t�� i ��rli-~y11• }1 ��� e'. �+ \���i� v�i� �it Y•1� s{� ,"� 1' ?A�/ .4�Y,• 4 ti M� ``,�'�.. a5 +\ t � }17} .t tr �� +yr \\� ��� 5t.-r rl �: JI ,. •lr,' r n � ��_'41^��} ��. wry.`#�. �`ui � j_ � rt t / tt �1 � +:LIt, t a / r ,�}s• 1 i a' � yr P �", r � q1i^ /Af�, �•(n �rY' i s�F tit 9 F i l+. 3 /Yf� ,�ti� ! f u r a}1 �•t .,t, ,C:�%; i it ' •v i A�+C- e i .lT > g cw' + �•' ,Y.i,,.:, iar .�rK z i�I ''[-= r if`°��-'�•j -c`f n�< *t.' iR ,}t �D.t�� i ��i li•� •� �- I '• � � C s:+ 4,1 'I'�`.k it ,,� \ rt� 6 �� `F,f - - { J � RSA:., t #; ' 4.( '; t � �i y� f. t`*4"'t'2,���'4`t gt�+ 2 F'`` � Y •,, . S. r-r :. i F•\-. 1•Jrt i'! f rFt �: - l l' _ ✓ �� � 'X ;; � •z. � -mac. � �i t lk elm Yl r .n - I~•b ,• i '� 4'/�/�J .� n ,ram -r tE .' C`� `; / � � . r c13�.���'3.,;..� �I.- Gi �, � +Vr1 -'`"'ate �? � •i �`�` ;�� �,�� � '� rY �' J ..r, 1•+t4..✓ !�`fx t 'hl S yyk>\.h r`' � Y%fy*•t � "S .J,.iaw ../-f �� 1.--.� a� � ^I � �,_., ti ' �yy' +...,.I. L•�f >I ,i.��l• ) Ct �'�';"l -, � - .� '�_ �' •,. ` ':t.s• � � 'mac-li.4/ •, • r �,-••.-a, ��- �-- l..i i 4+� ,-4 moo; ' 6� j - *' � S �� 9 � . _ ' - � • �lf 1 '�`h � t��,.f '?� Yt�i)l c��n ii•. a, 1V��?� �{r.�p1 . ✓` r i 3 J / f C Y' { '41 '3 � J i� lr �d ��• '. - 'i ��tt i d^{� J�i' .�� .i14 '�� °Aft \t'� n � ,ram'-y �r�' =• - 'i' .sly I 6 T Y'- ;. •/� /j� C fin" /$� � .1 Z" -' i i r 1 y+ y t •t41 -� � *-r� � �+'� a ��'� � I'�4D V rt ,+ F� ,�, r �lF'�i ��tF tf'� t1����21t`+y �14 yt�li+{ � �Qq+ F y5r� h�t4 � 1`r e" 1.'��d a � 4e.t i •Y � 1��� 1i•..` �i' � $F1 r • ��� t � •{, 1T ,i%' t`�i,Fat t' 1"'4,!••t!`i°a6tl r st, t {t r a [ +'4' ' 't �", t .'� it ti F v (r t� d r i� WY�p1a: A a 1[}1✓.Mt't'' • I,�S2 �jZ J+��-`• } � ��., a Jr � d F e« t 3 t�,1� ,tpy ! ±t�. V` A `c'+�'• t t r !tw i t i �r . S •L �,. 4 +�' 1 4 F•'� �r *dA 1 �i/e y 1 , i@ 5 �`e. ; _r 5 i v r i i"' FJ v ahy.+ * 1l+ Y� a c ! r '+tAI 0! \ >: \ •r it V I ve' kt 1 ° b`�,}' y K 'Y. s�i( �.�:+ �oQrD J e. r � � • �a;�}t i ' dr t «s�•.�.� r pp,,�� y,. + a` � � .. �' t Tit lt'" F ,'-` � � b^ ti f .f'"�. -r '"»t i��y�•♦ 41���,'� a F' ��,4 + Y .tr ' }�;i: 1 {� 'il. `l }� \ ^ t r3!' 'v�' YW � ,v``{FF��'' .O.w�.e�{`�R '� 4' r . � F I t � � t may. I ��1 1't;�q (•`, n b 4! �'n,:'' 7' �i �,��/+j �+a�►1kf � x'ir j� i5 a ..a� �.is"-.• ' 't . � � ` t 1 �r�'5 .�' t� � �. tt4«y,i5t�,,��ir r. g r y}�+ t } !� .� 1 �i'.,�',1 : -►;P �y1, ,. :.� r,. r //,( �ii.F��' •: ���d�x ? •!y'.�t i''• .'i.' r tw,Jylil`• ..tV.. !'a ' S(riJ ♦ F`{ 1 Y'�i�Y0rt,?"`AG.'i\' ,~ i. t t. t.� ✓4 '.fit .ram .47 �..F 1 �rs�5`r •bn . �, :. / r r � �.�^+�,� ( J(�j�� 4h4j�''u�,y�t�'i' t „, , � t .h ti ` '..b \ � � k•..�� �fI„v'.`C` y', r� i � ��y�"�yy, {alrl:�,arfdi oex •{:\•ttt`�. s, t/ ��4 �h�"'r 4f a�. v, `r -7S �.T is p, '�, l ASP y° _ ry :t\�`•.�,\ P t,' �. . '••t� },C4''-k.1s !y/ .:�,rl�1 �_'„ 'i @„ .� 1', s 1 d 'r'���,•. r�}(.r;. tSr 4 ,� ' '1"��` y �. it.� d � ;'. r �8e 1 X t •i r`� ti 1j1 . ;.t�,r;y iyT �'t \fh,. ,+r. (, _N( �'yydy e�•�{d' y�,,O : ��y,�ii ttp`��Ct;��i �r�'""r�ti,q ), t, 1 t:^•r• t "C'! .,' �'`Y�`f a�!�'A•k l'i, of CC3 •.• (tr A rr ,,.�' r j('1 > <�, rt�y• tti 4 t4k .� �q s,�''c�ky'��,�/CC(( a �i � ,•. !� / ' dr y.. T'(� v, •+i,{'!� r''p af3 .r4 CI• ��\ ,+ j ibrt !,� 1�r.5 'aOo1, � •t ��.... r � � 1 .. �t l i it". � r ` ; t !� �f �4. r �� F •t,5. y,�•' � a ,,,l�n ��. �It✓ d( � a'"4 t'atPtw�9"\�if'�n.r. r .. = at ^� ... en•• iv • -- ----, . _ .. • .�,�r�L! -�, },tjgr4r( 1� 5 _ 5 � ,ey�, � � �>g�'� a Iku tl►c 'u�� yi 1 1 9 •8 � �• �' 1�7 t •�a �1 o r k �� lit ���9 t � i �, d �• �, 1 •h I � I f it st ty t`•�'�+},�j �n&"i1�ry�'�. •�AS�fi. � 7. �� 111, .' _.i �" �. , ' ' '°�' ' �'4��'rk'.i'�p7'• �4t �• � ka•'• t V,�x t!'� ,�1 ,. .•� , 1`.I� � t i :;� ti � >i�� tad � a r• �w • rr{ ^.)�. -ICJ tc�r� �8 h5'•.� �� ,� #x�i �j i��' �i � '.1 t t•. • r �I ia� 14 .,r ` ryr r _ »^�a Y•,, - t 4ar Vi pALl ej.P hi �' � ,) r f } f, # A � �', At,} .A : ,..•_ i��.4,� 1 � I Y C d'� 1 y+ � �/. R`� TJe 1'p �, • :.� 4+ 'yk r ,,w-tiS�4♦ 4 t+HQ1`�t �fi' ( t a. R t •-it �' t {r"� r S•� . t tl.; j sy(r?.. -t. v r }�r"{„� . }k.-T.,,ya• Oda jMstt's r S s M 7j '�(�{�y 'K S r r a' 'tj�iXi �rvt �^F: 2 • w,�tiits�t �l i! �"�}'� rt t A}. -+.1 µg.4 writ! i r'�8��'i :S 5'd.'. .'� `• ... � .^'r 44 IMISW 1? i'Vt f M�',: R v s,• .zy..r 53 �i t '��a'� ). q t .,,,� r$ +� nlptT 4,rvt �i'•`! yt!,� �..• U t.'r 651�tf' i r'►=.w %AM.q�+pj���tify -. � r t t r� r r I �i•.. �ri� (_ / ,r r 9 ��. r � : ,4f �.l' ' .'i,�i r sS • �. �ae�, ti� � .. ,t: a ''�*lyd� 4x 1�y 1 �.! S 1•X41 � 1 .�N « y,J. '.. aL. ` ! 'l )+�'�,rt1t��. �..r t�...t? ' �' �' , t'• , A, � r ' 'k «an �.; s`I ,v Mr,'r", i'n R 7,tt jar.4q ! t�l .r �'; � i t `t�4•b'h� ��b } �t a+.`)yi s'v`t � �� � f••'' ��t�i �t.%ar �;;; � i Y�f( iyt���S y�+9�r • �'' tt9� S Art a ,,,:i ' �'•� Yy.� Q v. ., t1t. � Z^r'r� q W• �t�t' bA; �i'l' • .•+ � tl ,Y1' +R a`•'t t .' �{ r. ,i}•ram •, , p'iy'��� t o q'Y?`�ri��j�,,ls; r '� +p{ t . � cts � t ' f. R \a ` •41• �'. ',rr 4,,`4' .. _�i I .mod 4L •r 't. - �►1y ,�� y.dI-t+� !� e � •�• T :'. it ' ' � � ' =r"'�� � •il"; ice; ,,:.. r•:�' • .. ; St.;'�.I. I A` :fir~. - �.,y;�e;� r 1-i.• it y r t., `� +' �1 �� ':}fit uk f-r`l c 1.1, �:t �r / 1 - `, i:.,, • 'I. ttT 'dF Z7t joQ''^ `/• �r .,a 7 r r td ju�°t foy�i^' e � �' ^ - a'a � -d � ~t �t I. Y� �•c�, ;1 :r+r� 1S'' of l%,tt d ' I i ' ti U L.1 kA 1=+.,i �' Ir�yfr.•IY < {tl �:�—•;�;-. K jI•j� i '+• r+}"?' a '.b��,�, Y I A •1 ��,ryp • � •Tn da'e •r e. '.iJ ., '1" \y1. .. �4�' � r 1\ t� t -�f•� � �w S A v ty �))�� '•�li .r�� t' 1/�''"LiLa "��il 1{� � � . i. ('} .1.1• 1� � �` � fl -tYJ i7 ............. Of I Al JI ,. ', \ 1 /. 5 � .�' `� of%� �� •. ..s ;.spy , ° �` ' �+ � `�• \� � of ) f is• � ^� e ` r.. 7 c' /"� � r V'4yii4�'£'� % G..i.� • �1 +'y _., M �. + riF'ti ,�' ` vt�� M� t _.. •�� v' ;� � � � of i$'� ��' r� + c'Y.' t+!1I r Ry y v � r T� � ef�+11,,�Fr+�•h a .". `yy § � �° \ p �r t'f� d Jr vs p ,ii !; ,1 r 'Ac !fC' ,fr' iri:� r S t^•'y�;•}7, r e •sI i i'lit�-1� S+� .l y .f. :ri � }jt. v t t-..:.^u:.''s OI•• R � , '�•� `'••l1Ml J I r ,71 �;.f}e'l r ti'r') rt%" R F r' ` -R ,'+? .. •'}'+r• t .. .• �'�li �t o t ?, Y I ,r r� f Ar}S Fc7tu'jj A�f ti' I? ?Sy •r N. '1 ti��i.�� \ , J- t• ii fl J• r M 4 � r t) �+f 3vY }+'1 i�,�7Q: ;✓Ad'. �•�:'!}d \,:\ /~`6 ;.. /� �l ,R"yy? r.1S'r/,twit }.: .gar?s9�.^ "��•r � .• a ,I Alt-t.-(`"' �,�+'�a � �;!' •' :' ;` J 4 � •' ..ail d 1 .11*1 -•a , .^ e J ; r `� � 'q.• `. .� .'•, � t� 1 r � •;v • v 6 �/' .ti{Z y; / 1:• t0Q .- �/•'•r •, { �`4 /�� • d � 'iL3Jf, •M v.�r��.l�.y �. ?. ( r.. • �.t •:p •if � -,. t � +. \ If .� t3 �' l •S' .` J � . ' � .Q . 'ram t>1'��'�f ''} 4Ylrts .� a�G� � ,.1r ��' .+• ;iv. • ••Q2�ri'Y'..r+' �jpTjrj�:''' .".��rlf,, ti�{��� 'Sj. f`•'.�' _ "° - Yy •r 'i :i�,S!'6ri:.. •�' .� uef9y;If fir,, •r� a �+r� � ;�,F.iyl,�� 11 r- n .,{t� { R-(q'P +�,n' r � 7 '. t f•- t i : • .1•.r • . k �i r r. r J } I }S R r �' 1 . J t�,U P� 'l ?R �`•r�' y ri S: d 11XJ;q h rti'tw�!r f�r'^�%+•J�.Yy}J�fe�3,("�p�r'�1wt,;�b,�h}uy:. f�.,y C�� .,. '1 •r �}; �r�,�ad �s�t �.x�`if* <fR` ti.'�', � tStyt ;p �� t 1r�t i,+��. i"',�1 • •A ,.'{;. '',' ^I. DTI u i� 1. art\ r,' ti..�11.:•';�'� ,y, .,•,, � • y� i l 1, E t � f ivf 1 p r �S.A.�•,� �IF 4 • � .. %:� . �. ice::.{ N 'r f -h `� tISY •tom, }� r • f ti ' • ;� t � I •1 4' f j 1 `11 ,, rr•1 tr? ,A f t; 7 L A'p S ! , 4Ajf ��fAR•- ywalN 'S'� i • • . t' C t it .tr i . :•Ar ..A i�•I^ AlQu7 • cif • r ��� � :j '` S Yt �r wi I ti4. LCiplr t i. }� t l pt r'- p-r LJ � .'r•ii��.r.�� � rq{ ♦ 'mod I ... ; , i VS'X�Qrµ•Y�, '. r rah-, .Lv F5 �jAT ! uv 09/19/94 12:34 i� L FAX 206 672 7998 LOVELL SAUERLAND @ 001 - L.-Saue oociates, Ind. EET. R FILE ;r r M' � f r-, n i '° Q W l o t9 200 .(206) T1iwi Seattle, (206) 340 0830 Engineers/ sumeyom/Planners./ Development Attn: Bob Alberts City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Proposed Preliminary Plat of Dear Mr. Alberts: To date the preliminary plat process fi to the mutual satisfaction of the City a is an amplification of information we provide sufficient justification for the Chapter 18 of the Community Deveb for application of drainage rules and rE is to maintain high quality surface development from higher runoff rates public property from flooding or erc purposes are met. Also, Section 18.30.040 H. allows capacity and condition of downstream on -site disposal of water, existence of the drainage 'system. The downstream drainage situation fol report dated April 23rd, 1993. It Indic an existing piped system which drains 130 acre basin was discussed in detail in 1989 titled "Edmonds Drainage Bas'. by the project would only ever be use( Also, since upstream elements of this basin is already developed without del ever be needed for other projects furl Referring back to the purpose and i expose nearby land to higher ruml expose private or public property to It will not adversely affect the do, receive stormwater. S p 2 0 9994 FAX. (206) 672a998 ENCa1619iip\1' September 16, 1994 4SA File No. 2926 i i tairez Vista (P-93-216); Detention Storage requirements Kauez Vista has not resolved the issue :of detention storage d the developer. Toward -that end, the following discussion lave previously presented. Hopefully this information will ,ity to eliininate detention as a requirer*nt of development. ment Code for the City of Edmonds provides the guidance Dilations. Its stated purpose (paraphrasing section 18.30.000) ater by protecting it from pollution, to protect land near Nch might cause erosion or flooding, to protect private and ion, and to promote development practices to assure these i wiations fiom the requirements of the (code, based on the icilities, the effect on receiving bodies of water, damage from gional detention facilities, or major difficulties in maintaining i i this project was previously discussed in a Lovell-Sauerland ted that all runoff from the proposed project would drain into about 130 acres of the City directly into Puget Sound. This )y URS Consultants in 1989 in a study prepared for the City i Studies".. The study indicated that the'pipe system affected at about 6.5 percent of its "open channel," capacity of 95 efs. ,ystem have a much .lower capacity, and a major part of the .ntion, it is highly unlikely that the total excess capacity will er upstream. at of the drainage code, it is evident that the project will not t will actually reduce the effects on nearby land. It will not oding or erosion —as the downstream system is under utilized. tream receiving body —Puget Sound has infinite capacity to 09/19/94 12:35 f FAX 206 672 7998 LOVELL SAUERLAND 12002 FILE City of Edmonds Page 2 Other ' isdictions reco gnize gnize the sense of allowing direct discharge to nearby receiving bodies of water. Both City of Bellevue and King County allow direct discharge of unconprolled runoff when the downstream conveyance system is adequate. ` Other municipalities have iimilar policies and exemptions. The DOE Stormwater Ma iagement I fanual fvr the Puget Sound Bgsin requires runoff volume control specificatiy and only f "streambank erosion control." It is recognized that each jurisdiction also has a responsibility tc protect conveyance systems, but in t}tas ease there is no capacity problem and no stye=bank to be eroded'or to protect from project impacts. In light of the; above discussion, we art: requesting a deviation from the City's ;customary practice of mandating detention storage. If this request is `denied, we also ask that the denial be in written form giving reasons as required in sec ' n 18.30,040 H of the Edmonds Code. ;Please Set us know if you require; further information on to reach your decision. i J auclay, aig Campbell, P.E. MEMORANDUM DATE: September 13, 1994 MEMO TO: Edmonds Planning Division FROM: 0� Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed 15-Lot Subdivision at 9117 Olympic View Drive Attached is a letter from Mr. Linton, a homeowner downstream of the proposed subject development. Due to prior problems with flooding and erosion on his property, Mr. Linton would prefer that stormwater from the proposed development .bypass the system which goes through his lot. However, this is not feasible due to the steep slopes on the Kairez property. Because of the existing high rates of flow in the storm system and the difficulty of maintaining the system, it appears that the best and most appropriate method for handling stormwater from the new development is to detain the water in an underground pipe or vault and release it at the predeveloped rate. Allowing the stormwater to pass the site uncontrolled would create higher rates of flow which could result in a washout similar to that which occurred previously. DF/cmc Enclosure OVDSBDV.DOC ti v♦ L'INTON INDUSTRIES INC. 6306 202nd Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (206) 774-7787 Fax: (206) 672-8940 August 16, 1994 City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Jeffrey S. Wilson Dear Sir: I am in receipt of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed 15 lot subdivision located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. I currently own the property directly to the north of the subdivision shown as Lot 36 and 37, and my residence at 17802 Talbot Road. With respect to the preliminary site plan on file at the City of Edmonds planning division, I have great concerns to the proposed storm retention design. In February of 1967, due to heavy rainfall, water run off coming from property above and including the proposed 15 lot subdivision, saturated the ground and a large landslide on Lot 37 occurred. The resulting slide blocked the railroad tracks and ended up in Puget Sound. The City, in an effort to prevent this from recurring, installed a 24" storm pipe through Lot 37. It is my concern that an open retention pond, large enough to handle this size subdivision, not properly designed or maintained, will create conditions that will allow this washout to happen again. Further, the existing storm system manhole located on Lot 37, which would receive the run-off from the retention pond, currently appears to be running at near capacity during heavy rainfall. Steep terrain, dense landscape, rockery walls, and retaining walls all make maintenance of the existing storm line on Lot 37 very difficult. PRECISION ANO GENERAL METAL FABRICATION y It would be my recommendation to: (A) If site water retention is necessary, that a design using the concrete vault method with an overflow draining to the west side of the site be used. (B) Capping the existing system at Lot 37. Intersecting the existing line south of Lot 37, and connecting it to the new subdivision storm system sized to handle the increased loads. And routing the outfall line down the slope on the west side of the site, running parallel to'the railroad tracks at that elevation, and tying into the existing manhole that currently drains under the tracks to Puget Sound. The existing line entering this manhole would remain to handle the storm sewer loads from Lot 36 and 37, and Talbot Road. If designed in this manner, site storm retention may not be necessary. I would be most happy to meet someone from the engineering division, or a representative from Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, at th-e,,s�to to better explain my concerns. 11 Robert Linton 774-7 7 RL:rab cc: Don Fiene s7fft-ET FILE MEMORANDUM August 11, 1994 TO: Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor FROM: Gordy Hyde, de, Engineering En ineerin Coordinator SUBJECT: Engineering Division requirements for preliminary plat application (P-93-216) for George Kairez at 9117 Olympic View Drive . The Engineering Division has compiled the attached requirements which have been approved by the City Engineer. There are still numerous outstanding issues to be resolved regarding the proposal. The Engineering Division is hopeful that these issues can be resolved through use of good engineering practice which will allow the proposal to be brought into compliance with the Edmonds Community Development Code, and approved for construction by the City Engineer. We continure to have reservations regarding the placement of the road with proposed construction of a massive retaining structure along a_ property line, adjacent to existing residences. It would appear that the tremendous visual impact that a structure like this would have on an existing neighborhood could be minimized if it were located on the interior of the property, so that the impact created would be limited to the new home owners. KAIREZ2.DOC CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS NAME: KAIREZ VISTA FILE NO: P-93-216 HEARING DATE: VICINITY: 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE req'd Prior req'd Bond Complete to w/Bldg. Posted Recording Permit 1. Rights of Way for Public Streets: -92nd PI. W. is to be a minimum of 40 feet wide. X -91st PI. W. is to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. X -178th PI. SW is to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. X 2. Easements (City utilities, private access, other utilities): -Provide easements over private roads for access and utilities. X -Provide 10 foot wide maintenance easements over all public X utilities for maintenance. -Provide gravel or ACP access to sanitary and storm sewer X manholes for maintenance. 3. Street improvements (ACP with curb & gutter): -Pave 92nd PI. W. to a minimum width of 24 feet from face of curb X to face of curb, with concrete curbs and gutters. -Pave 91st PI. W. to a minimum width of 18 feet from face of curb X to face of curb with concrete curbs and gutter. -Pave 178th Pl. SW to a minimum width of 18 feet from face of X curb to face of curb with concrete curbs and gutters. -Streets to be designed to a maximum of 12% grade. X -Slopes of streets are not to exceed 6% for a minimum of 20 feet X at intersections. -Provide guard rail along rockery and above any drop-offs X exceeding three feet and 2:1 slope. -Maintain minimum two feet clear zone. X -Provide geotechnical review and approval of road design. X -Any retaining walls built in public rights -of -way shall be designed X per WSDOT standards and reviewed and approved by geotechnical engineer and structural engineer. X -Provide design calculations for retaining wall. X -Show impact of construction on existing rockery and properties west of roadway. 4. Street turnaround: -Provide turnarounds and cul-de-sac to meet city standards with X minimum of 25 foot radius returns on 178th PI. SW, 91st PI. W., and 92nd PI. W. 5. Sidewalks and/or walkways: -Provide 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk for the entire length of 92nd X Pl. W., 91st PI. W., and 178th PI. SW. 6. Street lights: -Provide street lights at following locations: X On Olympic View Dr. at intersection of 92nd PI. W. On 92nd PI: W. at south line of proposed lot 3. On 92nd PI. W. at end of cul-de-sac. de sac. 7. Planting strip: -Maintenance of planting within cul-de-sac is to be performed by X landowners. -Trees planted in rights -of -way of private roads and upon X easements to be approved by City of Edmonds as street trees. req'd Prior req'd Bond Complete to w/Bldg. Posted Recording Permit 8. Water system improvements (pipelines, fire hydrants, pump stations, telemetering, D.S.H.S., etc.): -Water lines to be minimum 8" ductile iron per City standards. X -Water system to be looped, but valves will be placed in line in X turnarounds so that the system can function as two dead-end lines. Services to affected lots must be installed in front of valves. -Three way valves will be required at the connections on Olympic X View Drive and Talbot Road. -Fireflow requirements shall comply with Appendix 3A of 1991 X Uniform Fire Code. -Provide fireflow calculations for each proposed fire hydrant. X -Provide fire hydrant at the following locations: X In turnaround at end of 178th PI. SW. In turnaround at end of 91st PI. W. In cul-de-sac at end of 92nd PI. W. -Provide water service to each lot. X 9. Sanitary sewer system improvements (pipelines, pump stations, telemetering, health district, etc.): -Provide sanitary sewer service to each lot. X -Provide specifications and explanation on construction methods X and impact of construction activities on existing pipelines and slope stability. Provide acceptable guarantees regarding damage to existing pipelines and slope stability for the life of the pipelines. 10. Storm sewer system improvements, (pipelines, pump station, D.O.E., fisheries, etc.): -Provide stormwater quality enhancements. X -Provide stormwater service to each lot. X -Provide detention for entire plat. Stormwater system to be X designed to detain water for a 25-year event, with release calculated for a ten year event. -Provide specifications and explanation on construction methods X and impact of construction activities on existing pipelines and slope stability. Provide acceptable guarantees regarding damage X to existing pipelines and slope stability for the life of the pipelines. -Provide individual detention for lots 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 15. 11. On -site drainage (plan per Ord. 1924): -All impervious surfaces to have detention and water quality X amendments. 12. Underground wiring (per Ord. 1387): -Underground wiring is required for all new construction. X X 13. Excavation and grading (per UBC, Ch. 70): -Provide detailed grading plan to include temporary erosion and X sedimentation control plan. -Grading in excess of 50 cubic yards on each lot requires permit. X 14. Simage (per City Engineer): -All signs must be vinyl lettered. No silk screened signs will be X permitted. -Provide street name signs for 178th PI. SW, 91st PI. W., and X 92nd PI. W. -Provide sign at Olympic View Drive and 92nd PI. W. which reads X "TO 91 ST PL. W." -Provide high intensity stop signs for 178th PI. SW at Talbot Road X and 92nd Pl. W. at Olympic View Drive. -Provide "Street ends" signs and "Private Road" signs mounted on X street name signs. -Provide "no parking any time" signs along all plat roads. X -Provide additional safety items on Olympic View Drive as X discussed in LSA letter of 5/31/94 to City. req'd Prior req'd Bond Complete to w/Bldg. Posted Recording Permit 15. Survey monumentation (per Ord., Sec 12.10.120): -Provide concrete monument and case at intersection of 92nd PI. X W. and Olympic View Drive. -Provide concrete monuments and cases along centerlines of 92nd X PI. W., 91 st PI. W., and 178th PI. SW 16. As -built drawings (per City Engineer): -Provide for all utility development construction. X 17. Other requirements: a) Plat showing lots, easements, legal survey information X b) Legal documents for each lot X c: Field staking - lot comers (by professional land surveyor) X d) Maintenance agreement (private road and utilities) X e) Utility development plan X f) Traffic study X g) Others -Lots 1, 2, 5, and 12 to take access only off 92nd PI. W. X X -Lots 9, 10 to take access only off 92nd Pl. W. X X -Lot 4 to take access only off 92nd PI. W. X X -Provide engineering calculations regarding stability of rockery, X X both existing and future, on 92nd Pl. W. -Driveway slopes must be identified on development plan. If X X there is to be a request to exceed 14%. It is the intent that no driveways exceed 14%. -All areas of fill will require confirmation of compaction test by X X independent testing company. -Grading and paving of 92nd PI. W. must match the existing X grade of the private road in Maple Manor. Joint access will not be permitted without improvements to Maple Manor private road. -Demonstrate and guarantee that vibration and operation of X equipment will not jeopardized stability of existing utility lines, the bluff, and adjacent properties. 18 Engineering fees: a) Drainage system design review @ $30 per lot X b) Sewer connection charge/LID assessment X c) Subdivision improvement inspection fee (2.2% of the approved X cost estimate) d Other related fees X for CI ENGINEER, CITY OF EDMONDS 'DATE The The Engineering Division requirements have been completed and the subdivision can be recorded. Authorized for recording by : Date: KAIRREQ. DOC STREET � ..7: • r NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS MAIN OFFICE 17311-135th Ave. N.E., #A500 13424 Chain Lake Road 101 East Marine View Drive Woodinville, WA 98072 Monroe, WA 98272 Orondo, WA 98843 (206) 486-1669 • FAX 481.2510 (206) 788-5612 • 794-4332 (509) 784-2756 February 19, 1993 Mr. John Bissell City of Edmonds Planning Division 250 - 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear John: Ifec�e FEB? vto 44* ? 1993 �G� This letter is a follow up to our conversation on Thursday, February 18th. We discussed the George Kairez project and the City of Edmonds three party agreement. Following our conversation, I contacted George and Lovell-Sauerland letting them know that you are expecting a new submittal with the critical areas identified. Lovell-Sauerland was wanting some input into my scope of services so that I did not only cover the critical areas, but also items relative to general site development. They have requested a meeting with me so that I am aware of what they want. Is this a meeting that you need to attend or can this be done prior to the third party agreement without violating the wishes of the city code? I would appreciate it if you would respond to this question. At this time I would also like to further introduce myself and our firm to you. I have been practicing geotechnical engineering in the Puget Sound region for about 15 years. Eight of those years was with GeoEngineers, the consultant that did the Meadowdale mapping for the City of Edmonds. I still have occasional contact with Don Tubbs the primary geologist that worked on the project. I left GeoEngineers in 1986 and joined a foundation and shoring contractor working primarily on the Metro Tunnel project. In 1989, I left the contracting firm and founded Couvrette Geotechnical Engineering. Just recently, I have joined forces with David L. Nelson and Associates from Monroe. DLNA has been in business for about 15 years. I have enclosed a few of our business cards for your reference as you will need to contact use when you develop the scope of work. If you have any questions, please call. Yours very truly, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. .:'Chuck Couvrette, P.E. President Enclosures 890 _ 19Cv 0 STREET FiLA CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (2061771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation " Engineering December 30, 1992 George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Kairez: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Subject: CRITICAL AREAS STUDY SCOPE OF WORK AND PROCESS, FILE NO. CA-92-91 Enclosed is the revised "Scope of Work" for the required Critical Areas Study for your property in which I have clarified the language which you inquired about. This revised "Scope of Work" will now be incorporated into the "3-Party" contract for the performance of the Critical Areas Study. If it is still your desire for us to consider James Finley of Geotech Consultants, Inc. as the consultant to enter in the 3-party contract with the City to perform the geotechnical portions of the study please state so, and we will contact Mr. Finley immediately to begin the process. With regard to the issue of eagle habitat analysis, as we discussed on the phone, we would be willing to review any documentation you can provide from Federal and State wildlife authorities on this issue. Upon review of these documents, we will then re-evaluate the need for the eagle habitat analysis. Finally, I have also enclosed a draft copy of the "3-Party" contract which we will use in this process. If you should have any questions regarding the enclosed material or process, please do not hesitate to contact either Rob Chave or myself at 771-0220. Sincerely, Community Services Department - Planning Division Jeffrey S. Wilson, AICP Current Planning Supervisor Enclosures PC: Critical Areas Determination File No. CA-92-91 Rob Chave, Planning Manager KAIREZ02/12-30-92.CORRES/LETTERS • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan L-1 CITY OF EDMONDS • iJ 0 , "I �1 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF A CRITICAL AREA STUDY George Kairez hereinafter referred to as "Proponent," , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," and the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter re erred to as "the City," for and in consideration of mutual promises contained herein agree and contract as follows: I. The City's Planning Official has determined that a Critical Area may exist on or near the subject property, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15.B. II. The City is to direct and supervise preparation and finalization of a critical area study to describe the items in accordance with ECDC Section 20.15.B.150. IIB. Paragraph IIB shall be applicable only during the life of this contract. The work of the Consultant and the critical area study are for the purpose of providing the City with information and analysis, independent from the Proponent and the owner of the subject property. To that end, the Consultant shall, during the life of this agreement, perform no other services for Proponent with respect to the subject property. In addition, the Consultant shall not perform services for the Proponent with respect to other property or proposed developments without full disclosure thereof to the City. Proponent specifically agrees not to communicate with the Consultant, except for such communication as may be necessary for the Consultant to carry out the performance of this agreement. Any such communication between the Proponent and Consultant shall be carried on only in the presence of or with the prior approval of the City. III. Proponent agrees to pay to Consultant in the manner set forth in Section VII below the reasonable costs of having the critical area study prepared. The Consultant has been recommended and selected by the City. Proponent understands and agrees to pay Consultant for actual time and materials expended in accordance with the scope of services set forth in Attachment "A" hereto, provided, however, that the total to be received by the Consultant for preparation of the critical area study shall not exceed the sum of $ . Progress payments are to be issued to Consultant in accordance with the provisions of Sections VII and IX in this agreement. IV. The Proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both Consultant and the City so as to cause the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. The City agrees to make available to the Consultant all relevant information in the City's files. V. The scope of services contemplated by this agreement shall include preparation of a critical area study which shall be delivered to the City on or before VI. Consultant shall prepare and deliver to the City up to 5 copies of the critical area study. VII. Proponent shall, within ten (10) days of the signing of this agreement: (a) Deposit with the City of Edmonds funds sufficient to pay for the cost of preparation of the critical area study, but not less than $ subject to the provisions of subparagraph (b) below; (b) Agree to disbursement from time to time of funds on deposit in said account to pay for Consultant services covered by the Agreement. Page 1 of 4 CA92-9I C/ 12-30.92.CRIIICAL\CONTRACT VIII. If the Proponent fails to deposit funds with the City as specified in Section VII of this agreement within the required ten days, this agreement shall terminate. IX. Consultant agrees to submit invoices for services and costs to date on a monthly basis along with a description of services rendered and a project progress report. The Consultant shall submit the original invoice to the City and a copy to the Proponent. The City shall pay the invoiced amount from the assigned account described in paragraph VII of this agreement within thirty (30) days of receipt if the work covered by the invoice has been satisfactorily completed. X. In the event the City, in its sole opinion determines there is a need for changes in the scope of work in Attachment "A," the City shall obtain from the Consultant an estimate of the total added charges and shall seek the Proponent's written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall then be amended to cover these changes, and the funds deposited accordingly to cover the changed scope of work. Failure to obtain such approval from the Proponent and to obtain an increase in the funds deposited to cover the proposed changes at the time of amendment, shall be grounds for suspension of work until agreement is reached. XI. The parties hereto agree that the critical area study and all supporting material therein submitted by the Consultant in the course of performing services under this agreement shall be, in the hands of the City of Edmonds, as public records and not subject to copyright. Consultant further agrees to make research notes and any other work products produced in performing this agreement available to the City for reproduction, upon completion of the critical area study, or sooner upon request by the City. XII. Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this proposal shall be governed by the laws of the City of Edmonds and the State of Washington. XIII. (a) The parties intend that an independent Consultant/City relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee, or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, or representative of the City or Proponent for any purpose. Employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits the City provides for City employees. The Consultant will be responsible for the acts of its employees, agents, and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to testify at any hearing concerning the project or the critical area study only if requested to do so by the City, unless pursuant to court order. (b) Consultant covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability, cost and expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, in connection with or occasioned, in whole or in part by any act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, customers, or licensees, or arising from or out of Consultant's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement, regardless of whether it is alleged or proven that the acts or omissions of City, it officers, agents or employees caused or contributed thereto. With respect to the performance of this Agreement, and as to claims against City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties. This indemnity provision shall not apply in the event any acts or omissions of the City were the sole cause of any Page 2 of 4 CA92-91 C/ 12.3(L92.CRTTTCAL\CONTRACT' such damage or injury. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees and the Consultant, its officers, agents, and employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees. (c) In the performance of the services herein contemplated, -the Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the work, subject to applicable regulations. However, the results of the work contemplated herein must meet the approval of the City, and shall be subject to the City's general rights of inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof, as required by ECDC Chapter 20.15.B. XIV. Proponent agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for breach of contract or other claim for damages brought by Consultant on account of any act or failure to act by the Proponent to pay the sums due under the terms of this Agreement. XV. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. XVI. The City reserves the right to suspend or terminate this agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and Proponent. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. The Consultant shall then invoice the City for all work performed in a satisfactory manner through the effective date of termination, and shall be paid by the City, subject to the limitations on liability contained in Paragraph IX; provided that if the termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, no payment shall be due. XVII. The Proponent reserves the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and City, and withdrawal of all related building, zoning, subdivision, and/or shoreline permit applications. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. XVIII. In the event that any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms of the Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party a sum for reasonable attorney's fees, including reasonable attorneys fees incurred prior to the filing of the action. M. Consultant agrees to report to the City any situation that might involve a possible conflict of interest in connection with the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall not have a financial interest in the proposal other than fees due under this Agreement. The Consultant will not perform any work or provide any services to any person in connection with or related to the Proposal, except as provided in this Agreement. The Consultant has listed in Attachment "B" all present contracts or work for the Proponent. XX. The Proponent agrees to provide the Consultant with a legal description of the project site, reproducible site plan or plans, copies of any relevant site studies produced by other consultants, and such other information as required by the Consultant. The proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both the City and Consultant so as to facilitate the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. XXI. This Agreement, including the Attachments hereto, represent the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and any negotiations, proposals, or agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by this written Agreement. Page 3 of 4 CA92.91 C/ 1 b3492.CRITICAL\CONTRACT ATTACHMENTS EXECUTED by the parties hereto this day of , 19 CITY OF EDMONDS: CONSULTANT, By By Laura Hall name: Mayor title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: PROPONENT, By By Rhonda March George Kairez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING MANAGER: By By Scott Snyder Rob Chave, Manager City Attorney Planning Division Attachments: "A" - Scope of Services "B" - Consultant/Proponent Contracts/Relationships Page 4 of 4 CA92-91 C/ 12-30.92.CRIr1CALXCONTRACr r ,ytAd�h iY_fA" GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 1 NC To Attn. EXPIRES 8 / 1 (206) 747-5618 Page of From V121d .+ram F"" I- v Date —illi4/9z Project q0 7 014Mpi.- U,'P:.. Di1r ; L01>XOKCi Job Subject �rlc"'o 4dl'& Axlds rJi'zaI AfM Fax Number 4 Number 9/I__7-Dv`yr•,plc,_i�;.e.w �'/l�_�-��� �✓,r.po��._cZf_o_��r v_�'S,-f ;✓�..s �o nbs�iy.P- 11LL /%P / C'J�l.$T_l_.1f;_ i/_�P C[Li1r_/ d�!3_J.7.0•_J1 .��—..L?/.h_.O�I /1lO_•('t_ /('y.� v1 �/ �iJ_I �/ P Q.C✓)<.i D_n.s___...��C I _U./.P _I P�u.irP � � __�I.P_?(?✓T P/_C�.F..f �^ .T_/_J!t! .S!�P _ /gRIJr�Cp QCr� Jt.`?S_ .�r!l e _iP i[JttS_ GIE�Q� PA _ inn /"`�j/ %S !!%/ �A�0. �_���k hvc�e� re:n. _ar_� .�y _�/a_r.� 6_.� �r. y---�--4. s.».� /.�_ s/� c/, •Tip a c�.�_��a c ,Fo.� --- ---r:A � y�y'P-�4.7.%0•. _..h�.s..�r�►a,�...>�c•1�-'�-�_-�o,'.«,_ . 7wh _s�v_►��s v�t_� .__. - �__IP.�rp,.;�P� Aff ?O.Cdb+dC..Vod s SPIpuA G�YPY C.K�rP_C G_u/O✓!o'ZS_tPFd �Os�y._.V<'(�_P_%r/�L�n!iG.S�Y_c?�1!�� _ rl! Y1a_e..s_.. 1 .— ?d _j�_P_O✓_r �l_r^YPSS.f_OvzQ-% o�i�ni.0_•� f%1Gr .�P cJe:,c.; ._b•�cl cFc���D•� cc.ea ed A o _.,Pros _,s_r��v„ed._. �e__u_e�-e...��l�o..,__��s ro,P,.�d �p a.�ea ,4�ia•Q 7�-e cleax�I_ a_ ldC� __!��_de �1n� r C.c�•rmF,�d i��.� P br�s%t b� cis_._ �en_� �.rei�o-r� �[��� �'�ie S�e -.P �s---r�'_.n�..ir�_/ WO..✓/d C rPa {�e :n_-O_r? Q� `s �✓l��r�c e_ cc: CITY OF EDMONDS ,3 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1 q O Public Works Planning • Parks and Recreation Engineering September 30, 1992 STREET FILE George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 III SUBJECT: MEASURES REQUIRED TO MITIGATE EROSION HAZARD AT 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE, EDMONDS Dear Mr., Kairez, LAURA M. HALL MAYOR 9130117 Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, and Jim Walker, Assistant City Engineer, from our office, made a field visit to your property on September 21, 1992. Mr. Walker and Mr. Fiene indicated that while much of the disturbed area is now vegetated, there are several bare, exposed areas of concern. We, once again, would like to reiterate our concerns and regulations reflected in our August 7, 1992 letter to you. If you cannot install the permanent vegetation practices as you.suggested you would in May (hydroseeding), you will need to establish temporary vegetative cover. (Please reference the attached details.) When you have satisfied these requirements, or if you have any questions regarding them, please.. contact Don Fiene at 771-0220, extension 323. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer DF/RJA/sdt Attachment c: Rob Chave, Planning Manager KAIREZ6/TXTST530 0 f • Incorporated August 11, 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan NeAf.Fi(E MEMORANDUM September 3, 1992 TO: File 9117 Olympic View Drive a� FROM: Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: PHONE CONVERSATION OF 9/1/92 WITH GEORGE KAIREZ Mr. Kairez returned my phone call on this date concerning a follow-up to my field visit of 8/13/92. I told him that a letter dated 8/28/92 from the City Engineer outlined our concerns and cleared up the misunderstanding he had about rototilling. He stated that he now could not afford to do the rototilling and hydroseeding (which he had agreed to do on an earlier date). I told him that if he could not afford to do so, he should, at least, seed the site temporarily with a rye mix. I told him after he had made such an effort to call me and I would be glad to inspect the site. He seemed to understand the engineering requirement and was not angry or hostile as he had been during our previous phone conversation and field visit. DF/sdt c:. Planning Division Building Division KAIREZ.4/TXTST530 STREET FILE M E M O R A N D U M September 3, 1992 TO: File 9117 Olympic View Drive FROM: Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: PHONE CONVERSATION OF 9/1/92 WITH GEORGE KAIREZ Mr. Kairez returned my phone call on this date concerning a follow-up to my field visit of 8/13/92. I told him that a letter dated 8/28/92 from the City Engineer outlined our concerns and cleared up the misunderstanding he had about rototilling. He stated that he now could not afford to do the rototilling and hydroseeding (which he had agreed to do on an earlier date). I told him that if he could not afford to do so, he should, at least, seed the site -temporarily with a rye mix. I told him after he had made such an effort to call me and I would be glad to inspect the site. He seemed to understand the.engineering requirement and was not angry or hostile as he had been during our previous phone conversation and field visit. DF/sdt c: Planning Division Building Division Alberts KAIREZ.4/TXTST530 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 775-2525 8 9 0- 1 9 9 August 28, 1992 George Kairez 9117`Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 STREET FILE URA M. HALL MAYOR Yh.eu-�.S.e� P�289z— SUBJECT:. MEASURES REQUIRED TO MITIGATE EROSION HAZARD AT 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE Ref: August 7, 1992 letter to George Kairez Dear Mr. Kairez, On a field visit to your property on August 13, 1992, Don Fiene from our office indicated that roughly one-half of the area in question is now vegetated. We still are concerned with the other bare, exposed areas and the sedimentation impacts these areas would have on the Sound. We would like to reiterate the concerns and regulations reflected in our August 7, 1992 letter to you. Concerning the issue of rototilling, I understand that you were under the impression that the City regarded this action as grading. This is not true, and we would like to clear up that misunderstanding. Your previous action that resulted in the imposition of the Stop Work order (issued by the Building Division) involved -the use of a backhoe. )Our only request.is that if you were to rototill, you hydroseed promptly after tilling and provide straw'mulch on all hydroseed areas. Jute or coir nets shall be used on slopes over fifteen'(15) percent. Please reference the attachments enclosed for additional details. Please contact Jim Walker, Assistant City Engineer, or Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, at 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, City Engineer DF/RJA/sdt Attachments P.E. c: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dick Mumma, Building Official KAIREZ4/TXTST530 0 Incorporated August 11,1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 775-2525 89p_194 August 7, 1992 George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 CHRON COPY Re: Measures requires to mitigate' erosion hazard at 9117 Olympic View Drive LAURA M. HALL MAYOR J,iQ, j ;J t 1-7 Dear Mr. Kairez, 0 The Engineering Division has reviewed site conditions on your property and hereby requests correction of an erosion hazard problem. Temporary or permanent erosion and sedimentation control measures, as described below, must be implemented on all disturbed areas. Temporary or permanent seeding of all disturbed areas is required. Seeding may be accomplished by sodding. If sod is used, it must be laid across the slope and pegged where the slope exceeds fifteen percent. (See attached recommendations.) Hydroseeding may also be used to reestablish vegetation. If hydroseeding is used, additional vegetative stabilization techniques will be needed. Jute or coir nets shall be used on slopes over fifteen percent and within twenty-five feet above any slope over fifteen percent. Straw mulch needs to be used on all hydroseeded areas. (See attached guidelines for application requirements.) The Edmonds Community Development Code, Chapter 18.30.100, authorizes the City to order a property owner to take measures to protect the public health, safety, and welfare from imminent dangers caused by erosion, flooding, and other drainage related problems. We feel your situation applies to this code. Please implement temporary or permanent erosion control measures as soon as possible, but not later than September 15, 1992. Please contact Jim Walker, Assistant City Engineer, or Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, at 771-0220, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer JCW/RJA/sdt Attachments • lncorpora;cd Aij!gtjsi 11. 1890 O KAIREZ/TXTST530 Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Japan MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT =1-4.4 TEMPORARY COVER PRACTICES T.-a 4 1 IMP El.10: Temporary Seeding of Stripped Areas Code: Tg Symbol: Refinition The establishment of a temporary vegetative cover on disturbed areas by seeding with appropriate rapidly growing annual plants. Purpose To provide temporary soil stabilization by planting grasses and legumes to areas which would remain bare for more than 7 days where permanent cover is not necessary or appropriate. This BLIP may, when used properly, help to fulfil the conditions contained in WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilisation and sediment trapping (see GC-1, section II-4.2.1 for further information) .' Conditions Where Practice Applies' • Permanent structures are to be installed or extensive re -grading of the area will occur prior to the establishment of permanent vegetation. • Areas which will not be subjected to heavy wear by construction traffic. • Areas sloping up to 10% for 100 feet or less. . Advantages 1. This is a relatively inexpensive form of erosion control but should only be used on sites awaiting permanent planting or grading. Those sites should have permanent measure used (see BMP E1.35, Permanent Seeding and Planting). 2. Vegetation will not only prevent erosion from occurring, but will also trap sediment in runoff from other parts of the site. 3. Temporary seeding offers fairly rapid protection to exposed areas. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Temporary seeding is only viable when there is a sufficient window in time for plants to grow and establish cover. During the establishment period the bare soil should be protected with mulch (see BMP E1.15) and/or clear plastic covering (see BMP E1.20). 2. If sown on subsoil, growth will be poor unless heavily fertilized and limed. Because over -fertilization can cause pollution of stormwater runoff, other practices such as mulching (BMP E1.15) alone may be more appropriate. The potential for over -fertilization is an even worse problem in or near aquatic systems. '. 3. Once seeded, areas cannot be used for heavy traffic. 4. May require regular irrigation to flourish. Regular irrigation is not encouraged because of the expense and the potential for erosion in areas that are not regularly inspected. The use of low maintenance native ' species should be encouraged, and planting should be timed to minimize the need for irrigation. DRAFT II-4-7 JUNE, 1991 MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND•BASIN also be used. Re -seeding - Areas which fail to establish vegetative cover adequate to prevent erosion shall be re -seeded as soon as such areas are identified. .,_,.,renance Seeding should be supplied with adequate moisture. Supply water as needed, especially -in abnormally hot or dry weather or on adverse sites. Water application rates should be controlled to prevent runoff. Re -seeding - Areas which fail to establish vegetative cover adequate to prevent erosion shall bere-seeded as soon as such areas are identified. VAC 173-27S-060(2)(k) Removal of temporary measures. All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilisation is achieved or after the temporary BVs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized. DRAFT II-4-9 NNE, 1991 MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT and these are also used as mulches, particularly in critical areas such as Matez�+aYs• They may be used to hold other mulches to the"soil surface. The choice of materials for mulching will be based on the type of soil to be protected, site conditions, season, and economics. It is especially important to mulch liberally in mid -summer and prior to winter, and on cut slopes and southern slope exposures.' Sty - Straw is the mulch most commonly used in conjunction with.seeding. its use is recommended where immediate protection is desired and preferably where the need for protection will be less than 3 months. The straw should come from wheat or oats, and may be spread by hand or machine. Straw can be windblown and must be anchored down. Common anchoring methods are: 1. Crimping, disking, rolling or punching into the soil; 2. Covering with netting; o 3. Spraying with a chemical or fiber binder (tackifier); and 4. Keeping moist. Natural precipitation can often provide sufficient moisture.(2) Corn Stalks - These should be shredded into 4 to 6-inch lengths. Stalks decompose slowly and are resistant to windblow. Wood Chios - Suitable for areas that will not be closely mowed, and around ornamental plantings. Chips decompose slowly and do not require tacking. They must be treated with 12 pounds nitrogen per ton to prevent nutrient deficiency in plants. .Chips can be a very inexpensive mulch if they are obtained from trees cleared on the site. However, both wood and bark chips tend to wash down slopes of more than 6 percent and create problems by clogging inlet grates etc. and are therefore not preferred for use in those areas. Bark Chive Shredded Bark - By-products of timber processing. Used in landscaped plantings. Bark is also a suitable mulch -for areas planted to grasses and not closely mowed; may be applied by hand or mechanically. Bark is not usually toxic to grasses or legumes, and additional nitrogen fertilizer is not required. Wood Fiber - Used in hydro -seeding operations, applied as part of the slurry. These short cellulose fibers do not require tacking, although a tacking agent or soil binders are sometimes used with wood fiber. This form of mulch does not provide sufficient protection to erodible soils to be used alone during the severe heat of summer or for late fall seedings. Wood.fiber hydro -seed slurries may be used to tack straw mulch. This combination treatment is well suited for steep slopes and critical areas, and severe climate conditions. There. are other organic materials which make excellent mulches but are only available locally or seasonally. Creative use of these materials can reduce costs. Chemical Mulches and Soil Binders - The use of synthetic, spray -on materials '(except tacking agents used with hydro -seeding) is not recommended. A major problem with their use is the creation of impervious surfaces and, possibly, adverse effects on water quality. Nets and Mats - Used alone, netting does not retain soil moisture or modify soil temperature. It stabilizes the soil surface while grasses are being established, and is useful in grassed waterways and on slopes. Light netting may also be used to hold other mulches in place. Its relatively high cost makes it most suitable for •small sites. The most critical aspect of installing nets and mats is obtaining firm, continuous DRAFT II-4-11 JUNE, 1991 MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT =, 8" II-4.1 GUIDE TO MULCH MATERIALS, RATES AND USES Mulch Quality Application Rates Depth of Material Standards Application Remarks' 1000 fta acre Gravel, Washed, 9 yds.' 3 inches Excellent mulch slag or - 1 for short slopes crushed size and around woody stone plants & ornamentals.. Use where subject to foot traffic. Approx. 2000 lbs/ d.' Say or Air dried, 75-100 1h-2h Minimum of Use where the straw free from lbs. or tons 2 inches mulching effect is unwanted 2-3 bales or to be maintained seeds & 90-120 for >3 months. Is coarse bales subject to wind material blowing unless kept moist or tacked down. Most common & widely used mulching material. can be used in critical erosion areas. Wood Dyed green 25 - 30• 1000- If used on fiber should not lbs. 1500 critical areas, cellulose contain lbs. double the normal (partially growth application rate. digested inhibiting Apply wood factors w/hydromulcher. No fibers) tie -down rehired. Packaged in 100 lb. bags. 'All awlcbes will provide sons degree of (1) erosion control; (2) moisture conservation, (3) weed control, and (4) reduction of soil crusting. DRAFT II-4-13 JUNE, 1991 MANAGEMENT MANUAL.FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT 9 *_a_5.3 BHP E1.35: Permanent Seeding and Planting Code: O Symbol: �— The establishment of perennial vegetative cover on disturbed areas. To establish permanent vegetation (such as grasses, legumes and trees and shrubs) as rapidly as possible to prevent soil erosion by wind or water, and to improve wildlife habitat and site aesthetics. To provide pollutant filtration (biofiltration) in vegetation -lined channels and to establish constructed wetlands as required. (see BMPs RW.10 and RB.05 in Chapter III-4) This We may be used alone or in conjunction with other BMPs such as BMP E1.20, Clear Plastic Covering, to fulfil the conditions contained in WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilisation and sediment trapping. Conditions Where Practice Applies • Graded, final graded or cleared areas where permanent vegetative cover is needed to stabilize the soil. • Areas which will not be brought to final grade for a year or more. • In vegetation -lined channels. • In retention or detention ponds as required. Advantages • Well established grass and ground cover can give an aesthetically pleasing, finished look to a development. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Vegetation and mulch cannot prevent soil slippage and erosion if soil is not inherently stable. 2. Coarse, high grasses that are not mowed can create a fire hazard in some locales. Mowed grass, however, provides less stability and sediment filtering capacity. 3. Grass planted to the edge of a watercourse may .encourage fertilizing and mowing near the waters edge and increase nutrient and pesticide contamination. 4. May require regular irrigation to establish and maintain. Planning Considerations Vegetation controls erosion by reducing the velocity and the volume of overland flow and protecting the bare soil surface from raindrop impact. Areas which must be stabilized after the land has been disturbed require vegetative cover. The most common and economical means of establishing this cover is by seeding grasses and legumes. Advantages of seeding over other means of establishing plants include the small initial establishment cost, the wide variety of grasses and legumes available, low DRAFT II-4-23 JUNE, 1991 •ATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN -Portions Percent 'NAM by Weiaht Purity Germination Kentucky Bluegrass 30% 85 80 (Adelphi, Baron or Fylking) Creeping Red Fescue (Pennant) 40% 98 90 Perennial Rye (Derby or Pennant) 30% 95 90 Rural Application: Kentucky Bluegrass ( oa 15% 85 80 pratensis) (Birk&, Majestic or Sydeport) Tall Fescue (Festuca arundincea) 40% 95 90 (Arid, Jaguar, or Rebel) Perennial Rye (Lolium perenne) 30% 95 90 (Derby or Pennant) Chewings Fescue (Banner) 15% 95 90 Cover the seed with topsoil or mulch no deeper than h inch. DRAFT 'Hydro -seeding" applications with approved seed -mulch -fertilizer mixtures may also be used. Wetlands seed mixtures - For newly created wetlands, a biologist should design plantings to provide the best chance of success. As a guide apply the following mixture at a rate of 60 lbs/acre, and/or additional tubers for cattail, bulrush, slough sedge, as required by the local Government. See,Chapter III-5, Volume III for more information on constructed wetlands. Do not under any circumstances use introduced, invasive plants like reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) or purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Using plants such as these will cause many more problems than they will ever solve. Proportions Percent Name by Weight Purity Germination Red Top (Aarostis alba) 1 30% 92 80 Birdsfoot Trefoil 30% 90 80 (Lotus corniculatus) Creeping Red Fescue 40% 98 90 (Penn lawn) Tree and shrub planting Besides their erosion and sediment control values, trees and shrubs also provide natural beauty and wildlife benefits. When used for the latter, they are usually more effective when planted in clumps or blocks. These procedures should be. followed: 1. Trees and shrubs will do best in topsoil. If no topsoil is available, they can be established in subsoil with proper amendment. If trees and shrubs are to be planted in subsoil, particular attention should be paid to amending the soil with generous amounts of organic matter. Mulches . should also be used. DRAFT II-4-25 JUNE, 1991 .e,;WATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT tT_d 5 4 BMP F;1.40: Sodding Code: SO Symbol: Definition Stabilizing fine -graded disturbed areas by establishing permanent grass stands with sod. purpose To establish permanent turf for immediate erosion protection or to stabilize drainageways where concentrated overland flow will occur. This BNP may be used to fulfil the conditions contained in WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilization and sediment trapping. conditions Where Practice Applies Disturbed areas which require immediate vegetative cover. • Waterways carrying intermittent flow, where immediate stabilization or aesthetics are factors and other locations which are particularly suited to stabilization with sod. Advantages r 1. Sod will give immediate protection. 2. Sod gives an immediate vegetative cover, which.is both effective in checking erosion and is aesthetically pleasing. 3. Good sod has a high density of growth which is superior in protection to a recently seeded area. 4. Sod can be placed at any time of the year provided that soil moisture is adequate and the ground is not frozen. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Sod is expensive. 2. Sod is heavy and handling costs are high. r 3. Good quality sod, free from weed species, may be difficult to obtain. 4. If laid in an unfavorable season, midsummer irrigation may be required. This also applies to very droughty sandy soils. S. Grass species in the sod may not be suitable for site conditions. 6. If mowing is required, do not use grass sod on slopes steeper than 3:1 (use minimum maintenance ground covers). 7. If not anchored or drained properly, sod will "roll up" in grassed waterways. Design Criteria • Shape and smooth the surface to final grade in accordance with the approved grading plan. . i Use of topsoil shall be in accordance with the requirements of Topsoiling (BMP E1.SO). DRAFT II-4-27 JUNE, 1991 STREET IL M E M O R A N D U M August 25, 1992 TO: File 9117 Olympic View Drive O� FROM: Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: FIELD VISIT OF KAIREZ PROPERTY AT 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DR. In the late afternoon of August 13, 1992, I made a field visit to inspect the residence of Mr. George Kairez. Jim Roberts accompanied me on the visit. The visit was in response to a phone conversation I had earlier in the afternoon. Mr. Kairez had indicated that the entire area in question (the stripped area) was now vegetated and that I could inspect it for myself. After arriving at the site, Mr. Kairez proceeded to show us the area in question. He pointed at the areas in question with his video camera and commentated on the situation. He asked me what the concern was with the present situation. I observed that there were still bare, nonvegetated areas that had the potential of causing sedimentation impacts on the Sound. Mr. Kairez asked me where it was going to go, and I told -him it would pass over the cliff and into the Sound. Mr. Kairez then asked if I knew where the dirt had gone that I had stated was stripped from the site. I told him it probably went over the cliff. Once again, Mr. Kairez had a raised voice throughout the discussion, although it was certainly toned down in comparison to the telephone conversation. Jim Roberts tried to calm Mr. Kairez down by stating that we weren't his enemies and that we just wanted to have the situation resolved. Mr. Kairez showed me photographs of the area in question as it looked years ago. The photos showed the area as being totally covered by grass. It seemed odd to me that Mr. Kairez thought this was some sort of positive indictment against the City. I told him that wasn't how the site looked now, but it looked like a good example of what it should be. He stated that the area had run down during the illness of his father and had been covered with blackberries, so he had pushed them off (without removing any topsoil) using a backhoe. He said his aim was to bring the site back to the condition shown in the photograph. I said that would be fine with me and would satisfy the condition he -had agreed to on May 29, 1992. Mr. Kairez stated that he couldn't rototill to prepare the area for seeding because Dick Mumma had ordered him not to. Mr. Kai-rez asked me if I thought rototilling should be considered grading. I said that I didn't think it should be. I also told him that I would bring the entire matter up at the Monday staff meeting. MEMO TO: File 9117 Olympic View Drive August 25, 1992 Page 2 Mr. Kairez gave me a copy of the contract proposal for the work dated June 2, 1992. I said that the proposal looked fine and if it were done, it would satisfy the conditions he had agreed to at our May 29, 1992 meeting. I reiterated that our concern in Engineering was with the sedimentation erosion impact and that he do what he had agreed to do on May 29, 1992. We left the site at approximately 4:30 p.m. DF/sdt KAIREZ3/TXTST530 r Alberts MEMORANDUM ST�� TO: File 9117 FROM: Don Fiene D( RE: Phone Conversation of 8/13/92 with George Kairez DATE: August_2-4,. 1992.. On the -afternoon of -August 13, 1992, I received a call from Mr. George-- Kairez. Mr. Kairez called concerning a case that had been ongoing with the City since May 29, 1992. Mr. Kairez had a.raised voice throughout our 40 minute telephone conversation. He repeatedly mentioned that he was going to sue the City, and several persons individually (myself included), because of the lies he said we had been guilty of in the course of the case involving his property. Most of his accusations were directed towards the Planning or Building Divisions, and repeatedly I had to direct him to the engineering concerns regarding his property. I told him specifically that my concern as Hydraulics Engineer was the impacts that his actions observed on May 29, 1992, (see letter attached) had with regards to erosion and sedimentation. On our meeting of -May 29, 1992, he had agreed to hydroseed the stripped area and stated he would do it within the next week. During our phone conversation, I repeatedly had to tell Mr. Kairez that this was the only concern I had. Mr. Kairez.continually argued that my estimate of the stripped area was -preposterous. I told him it was -an approximation based on my visit. He stated that no topsoil had been removed, only dust had covered the existing vegetation, and the blackberries had been pushed off. I told him that I did not agree with that, and neither had others from the City who had visited the -sight in -May. Mr.'Kairez then went on to state that if that were true, then why was the area completely vegetated now, without planting any grass? I told him I did not know what had transpired in the two and one half months since May 29, 1992, but that there had been plenty of time for weeds to establish or for him to establish grass. I went on to add that on two occasions we were going to inspect the site, but he had refused to let us look at his property primarily due to a dispute he had with Dick Mumma of the Building Department. He went on to say how everyone from the City was incompetent and used derogatory language throughout the course of describing various people, including the Mayor. His voice was loud enough to cause actual physical pain to my ears as I listened on the phone. I then tried to get him to focus on his problem with the Engineering Division. He stated that he could not comply with our requirement of hydroseeding the site because of the -Stop Work order placed in effect by Dick Mumma. He said that Dick Mumma had told him he could not rototill the site in preparation for the seeding. He asked me if I thought rototilling was grading. I told him I didn't think that it was, but that was not my call or decision to make. He indicated that the grass cover that was there now was adequate and that I should take a look at it. I told him that I would arrange to do so. DF/sdt V Y KAIREZI/TXTST530 Alberts MEMORANDUM, S7F?,CET FILE August 24, 1992 TO: File 9117 Olympic View Drive FROM: Jim Roberts, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE On August 13, 1992, at approximately 2:30 p.m., Don Fiene engaged in a lengthy conversation (approximately 40 minutes) with Mr. George Kairez who resides at 9117 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds. Following the phone call, Don Fiene reported that Mr. Kairez became very threatening and angry. Don felt it wise to have another Engineering employee accompany him for a,follow-up field inspection. At approximately 3:30 p.m., Don and I drove to the Kairez residence to investigate the site. Don examined the back yard and concluded that vegetation was not properly in place on a portion of the back yard location. Mr. Kairez claimed that the vegetation was missing due to a tree that was removed in the area. Don reminded Mr. Kairez that he had stated that the vegetation was in place during the lengthy phone call. Mr. Kairez became very angry and threatening (law suit). Mr. Kairez referred to the City staff as a "bunch of bastards" and spoke especially harsh towards members of the Building and Planning Divisions and specifically toward Bob Alberts and Mayor Hall. Mr. Kairez asked me if I thought that the site had been graded. I responded that it obviously had been graded at some point in time. Mr. Kairez responded that it was graded over thirty-eight (38) years ago. Mr. Kairez repeatedly tried to video tape specific portions of his conversation with us. We tried to explain that we were'not his enemies and only wanted to be of assistance. Mr. Kairez presented a copy of a bid he had received from a local landscaping firm to hydroseed the portion of the back yard in question. Mr. Kairez stated that orders from Dick Mumma prevented him from completing this task. Don Fiene advised Mr. Kairez that the matter would be discussed -during the next Monday morning Engineering staff meeting. Don advised Mr. Kairez that a grass surface in the location in question would suffice as an appropriate surface. During the entire visit to the Kairez residence, the attitude displayed by Mr. Kairez was extremely hostile, unlike anything I have experienced in twenty (20) years of service to the general public. At 4:30 p.m., Don and I left the site for an appointment in the Seaview area. JR/sdt KAIRE25/TXTST530 612¢- Alberts CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER . EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 775-2525 August 7, 1992 George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Measures requires to mitigate erosion hazard at 9117 Olympic View Drive Dear Mr. Kairez, T!f G LAURA M. HALL MAYOR M_aJ&j �- (7 h Z— The Engineering Division has reviewed site conditions on your property and hereby requests correction of an erosion hazard problem. Temporary or permanent erosion and sedimentation control measures, as described below, must be implemented on all disturbed areas. Temporary or permanent seeding of all disturbed areas is required. Seeding may -be accomplished by sodding. If sod is used, it must be laid across the slope and pegged where the slope exceeds fifteen percent. (See attached recommendations.) Hydroseeding may also be used to reestablish vegetation. If hydroseeding is used, additional vegetative stabilization techniques will be needed. Jute or coir nets shall be used on slopes over fifteen percent and within twenty-five feet above any slope over fifteen percent. Straw mulch needs to be used on all hydroseeded areas. (See attached guidelines for application requirements.) The Edmonds Community Development Code, Chapter 18.30.100, authorizes the City to order a property owner to take measures to protect the public health, safety, and welfare from imminent dangers caused by erosion, flooding, and other drainage related problems. We feel your situation applies to this code. Please implement temporary or permanent erosion control measures as soon as possible, but not later than September 15, 1992. Please contact Jim Walker, Assistant City Engineer, or Don Fiene, Hydraulics Engineer, at 771-0220, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer JCW/RJA/sdt Attachments • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • KAIREZ/TXTST530 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT II-4.4 TEMPORARY COVER PRACTICES Code: Tg Symbol: Definition The'establishment of a temporary vegetative cover on disturbed areas by seeding with appropriate rapidly growing annual plants. Purpose To provide temporary soil stabilization by planting grasses and legumes to areas which would remain bare for more than 7 days where permanent cover is not necessary or appropriate. This BkP may, when used properly, help to fulfil the conditions contained in WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilization and sediment trapping (see GC-1, section II-4.2.1 for further information).' Conditions Where Practice Applies' • Permanent structures are to be installed or extensive re -grading of the area will occur prior to the establishment of permanent vegetation. • Areas which will not be subjected to heavy wear by construction traffic. • Areas sloping up to 10% for 100 feet or less. Advantages 1. This is a relatively inexpensive form of erosion control but should only be used on sites awaiting permanent planting or grading. Those sites should have permanent measure used (see BMP E1.35, Permanent Seeding and Planting). '2. Vegetation will not only prevent erosion from occurring, but will also trap sediment in runoff from other parts of the site. 3. Temporary seeding offers fairly rapid protection to exposed areas. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Temporary seeding is only viable when there is a sufficient window in time for plants to grow and establish cover. During the establishment period the bare soil should be protected with mulch (see BMP E1.15) and/or clear plastic covering (see BMP E1.20). 2. If sown on subsoil, growth will be poor unless heavily fertilized and limed. Because over -fertilization can cause pollution of stormwater runoff, other practices such as mulching (BMP E1.15) alone may be more appropriate. The potential for over -fertilization is an even worse problem in or near aquatic systems. 3. Once seeded, areas cannot be used for heavy traffic. 4. May require regular irrigation to flourish. Regular irrigation is not encouraged because of the expense and the potential for erosion in areas that are not regularly inspected. The use of low maintenance native species should be encouraged, and planting should be timed to minimize the need for irrigation. DRAFT II-4-7 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND•BASIN DRAFT also be used. • Re -seeding - Areas which fail to establish vegetative cover adequate to prevent erosion shall be re -seeded as soon as such areas are identified. Maintenance • Seeding should be supplied with adequate moisture. Supply water as needed, especially•in abnormally hot or dry weather or on adverse sites. Water application rates should be controlled to prevent runoff. • Re -seeding - Areas which fail to establish vegetative cover adequate to prevent erosion shall be re -seeded as soon as such areas are identified. WAC 173-275-060(2)(k) Removal of temporary measures. All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 daps after final site stabilisation is achieved or after the temporary BNPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilised on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilised. I DRAFT II-4-9 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT and these are also used as mulches, particularly in critical areas such as waterways. They may be used to hold other mulches to the soil surface. The choice of materials for mulching will be based on the type of soil to be protected, site conditions, -season, and economics. It is especially important to mulch liberally in mid -summer and prior to winter, and on_cut slopes and southern slope exposures. Organic Mulches' Straw - Straw is the mulch most commonly used in conjunction with seeding. Its use is recommended where immediate protection is desired and preferably where the need for protection will be less than 3 months. The straw should come from wheat or oats, and may be spread by hand or machine. Straw can be windblown and must be anchored down. Common anchoring methods are: 1. Crimping, disking, rolling or punching into the soil; 2. Covering with netting; 3. Spraying with a chemical or fiber binder (tackifier); and 4. Keeping moist. Natural precipitation can often provide sufficient moisture.(2) Corn Stalks - These should be shredded into 4 to 6-inch lengths. Stalks decompose slowly and are resistant to windbl'ow. Food Chips - Suitable for areas that will not be closely mowed, and around ornamental plantings. Chips decompose slowly and do not require tacking. They must be treated with 12 pounds nitrogen per ton to prevent nutrient deficiency in plants. Chips can be a very inexpensive mulch if they are obtained from trees cleared on the site. However, both wood and bark chips tend to wash down slopes of more than 6 percent and create problems by clogging inlet grates etc. and.)are therefore not ` preferred for use in those areas. Bark Chips, Shredded Bark - By-products of timber processing. Used in landscaped plantings. Bark is also a suitable mulch -for areas planted to grasses and not closely mowed; may be applied by hand or mechanically. Bark is not usually.toxic to grasses or legumes, and additional nitrogen fertilizer is not required. Wood Fiber - Used in hydro -seeding operations, applied as part of the slurry. These short cellulose fibers do not require tacking, although a'tacking agent or soil binders are sometimes used with wood fiber. This form of mulch does not provide sufficient protection to erodible soils to be used alone during the severe heat of Summer or for late fall seedings. Wood fiber hydro -seed slurries may be used to tack straw mulch. This combination treatment is well suited for steep slopes and critical areas, and severe climate conditions. There are other organic materials which make excellent mulches but are only available locally or seasonally. Creative use of these materials can reduce costs. Chemical Mulches and Soil Binders - The use of synthetic, spray -on materials (except tacking agents used -with hydro -seeding) is not recommended. A major problem with their use is the creation of impervious surfaces and, possibly, adverse effects on water quality. Nets and Mats - Used alone, netting does not retain soil moisture or modify soil temperature. It stabilizes the soil surface while grasses are being established, and is useful in grassed waterways and on slopes. Light netting may also be used'to hold other mulches in place. Its relatively high cost makes it most suitable for small sites. The most critical aspect of installing nets and mats is obtaining firm, continuous DRAFT II-4-11 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT TABLE II-4.1 GUIDE TO MULCH MATERIALS, RATES AND USES Mulch Quality Application Rates Depth of Material Standards Application Remarks' 1000 ft2 acre Gravel, 'Washed, 9 yds.' 3 inches Excellent mulch slag or 4 - 1 for short slopes crushed size and around woody stone plants & ornamentals. Use where subject to foot traffic. Approx. 2000 lbs/ yd.' Hay or Air dried, 75-100 1h-2h Minimum of Use where the straw free from lbs. or tons 2 inches mulching effect is unwanted 2-3 bales or to be maintained seeds & 90-120 for >3 months. Is coarse bales subject to wind material blowing unless kept moist or tacked down. Most common & widely used mulching material. Can be used in critical erosion areas. Wood Dyed green 25 - 30, 1000- If used on fiber should not lbs. 1500 critical areas, cellulose contain lbs. double the normal (partially growth application rate. digested inhibiting Apply wood factors w/hydromulcher. No fibers) tie -down required. Packaged in 100 lb. bags. 'All mulches will provide some degree of (1) erosion control'; (2) moisture conservation, (3) weed control, and (4) reduction of soil crusting. DRAFT II-4-13 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT II-4.5.3 BHP E1.35: Permanent Seeding and Planting Code: PS Symbol: Definition The establishment of perennial vegetative cover on disturbed areas. To establish permanent vegetation (such as grasses, legumes and trees and shrubs) as rapidly as possible to prevent soil erosion by wind or water, and to improve wildlife habitat and site aesthetics. To provide pollutant filtration (biofiltration) in vegetation -lined channels and to establish constructed wetlands as required. (see BMPs RW.10 and RB.05 in Chapter III-4) This BMP may be used alone or in conjunction with other'BMPs such as BMP E1.20, Clear Plastic Covering, to fulfil the conditions contained In WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilisation and sediment trapping. Conditions Where Practice Applies • Graded, final graded or cleared/areas where permanent vegetative cover is needed to stabilize the soil. • Areas which will not be brought to final grade for a year or more. • In vegetation -lined channels. _ • In retention or detention ponds as required. Advantages • Well established grass and ground cover can give an aesthetically pleasing, finished look to a development. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Vegetation and mulch cannot prevent soil slippage and erosion if soil is not inherently stable. 2. Coarse, high grasses that are not mowed can create a fire hazard in some locales. Mowed grass, however, provides less stability and sediment filtering capacity. 3. Grass planted to the edge of a watercourse may encourage fertilizing and mowing near the waters edge and increase nutrient and pesticide contamination. 4. May require regular irrigation to establish and maintain. Planning considerations Vegetation controls erosion by reducing the velocity and the volume of overland flow and protecting the bare soil surface from raindrop impact. Areas which must be stabilized after the land has been disturbed require vegetative cover. The most common and economical means of establishing this cover is by seeding grasses and legumes. Advantages of seeding over other means of establishing plants include the small initial establishment cost, the wide variety of grasses and legumes available, low •DRAFT II-4-23 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT Portions Percent Name by Weight Purity Germination Kentucky Bluegrass 30% 85 80 (Adelphi, Baron or Fylking) Creeping Red Fescue (Pennant) 40% 98 90 Perennial Rye (Derby or Pennant) 30% 95 90 Rural Application: Kentucky Bluegrass ( oa 15% 85 80 Pratensis) (Birka, Majestic or Sydsport) Tall Fescue (Festuca Arundincea) 40% 95 90 (Arid, Jaguar, or Rebel) Perennial Rye (Lolium perenne) 30% 95 90 (Derby or Pennant) Chewings Fescue (Banner) 15% 95 90 Cover the seed with topsoil or mulch no deeper than inch. "Hydro -seeding" applications with approved seed -mulch -fertilizer mixtures may also be used. Wetlands seed mixtures - For newly created wetlands, a biologist should design plantings to provide the best chance of success. As a guide apply the following mixture at a rate of 60 lbs/acre, and/or additional tubers for cattail, bulrush, slough sedge, as required by the local Government. See Chapter III-5, Volume III for more information on constructed wetlands. Do not under any circumstances use introduced, invasive plants like reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) or purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Using plants such as these will cause many more problems than they will ever solve. Proportions Percent Name by Weight Purity Germination Red Top (Agrostis alba) 30% 92 80 Birdsfoot Trefoil 30% 90 80 (Lotus corniculatus) Creeping Red Fescue 40% 98 90 (Penn lawn) Tree and shrub planting Besides their erosion and sediment control values, trees and shrubs also provide natural beauty and wildlife benefits. When used for the latter, they are usually more effective when planted in clumps or blocks. These procedures should be followed: 1. Trees and shrubs will do best in topsoil. If no topsoil is available, they can be established in subsoil with proper amendment. If trees and shrubs are to be planted in subsoil, particular attention should be paid to amending the soil with generous amounts of organic matter. Mulches should also be used. DRAFT II-4-25 JUNE, 1991 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN DRAFT II-4.5.4 BMP E1.40: Sodding Code: SO Symbol: Definition Stabilizing fine -graded disturbed areas by establishing permanent grass stands with sod. Purpose To establish permanent turf for immediate -erosion protection or to stabilize drainageways where concentrated overland flow will occur. This BMP may be used to fulfil the conditions contained in WAC 173-275-060(2)(a), Stabilisation and sediment trapping. Conditions Where Practice Applies • Disturbed areas which require immediate vegetative cover. • Waterways carrying intermittent flow, where immediate stabilization or aesthetics are factors and other locations which are particularly suited to stabilization with sod. Advantages 1. Sod will give immediate protection. 2. Sod gives an immediate vegetative cover, which is both effective in checking erosion and is aesthetically pleasing. 3. Good sod has a high density of growth which is superior in protection to a recently seeded area. 4. Sod can be placed at any time of the year provided that soil moisture is adequate and the ground is not frozen. Disadvantages/Problems 1. Sod is expensive. 2. Sod is heavy and handling costs are high. 3. Good quality sod, free from weed species, may be difficult to obtain. 4. If laid in an unfavorable season, midsummer irrigation may be required. This also applies to very droughty sandy soils. 5. Grass species in the sod may not be suitable for site conditions. 6. If mowing is required, do not use grass sod on slopes steeper than 3:1 (use minimum maintenance ground covers). 7. If not anchored or drained properly, sod will "roll up" in grassed waterways. Design Criteria • Shape and smooth the surface to final grade in accordance with the approved grading plan. • Use of topsoil shall be in accordance with the requirements of Topsoiling (BMP E1.50). DRAFT II-4-27 JUNE, 1991 STREET MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION July 6, 1992 TO: JEFFREY S. WILSON, AICP, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR FROM: JOHN BISSELL, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN SUBJECT: CRITICAL AREAS STUDY FACTS AND CONDITIONS CA-92-91 Lot located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. Antonina Kairez has submitted a critical areas checklist for property located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. The property is mapped as an area of unstable slopes on the Critical Areas Map. A site inspection of the property revealed steep slopes with a substantial amount of vegetation. Subsequent site inspections revealed that much of the vegetation was cleared from the slopes without permits. Therefore a Critical Areas study is required to determine slope stability and mitigating measures to restore the site. The critical areas study must be conducted by a geotechnical engineer and a wildlife biologist. The study should present facts, conclusions and mitigating measures for site restoration. In addition to the required study the applicant is required to follow the conditions listed below: 1. The applicant must provide the City with a grading and clearing plan which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 2. The applicant must provide the City with a re -vegetation plan which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 3. The applicant must follow all erosion control measures imposed by the City Engineering Division which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 4. The applicant may dispose of graded material in an approved manner. The applicant may not dispose of any graded material by pushing the material over the side of the western bank. 5. The applicant may not grade any material or remove any vegetation from the side of the western bank. If you concur with these conditions, please indicate your concurrence below J fr y S. ,Ison, AICP, Current Planning Supervisor SCALE: TREE FILE S 1" = 50' VIOLATION REPORT FS ,- FkF VIOLATION # ' ZE-9245 `• PROPERTY LOCATION: DATE OF COMPLAINT: DATE OF REPORT 1 9117 Olympic View Drive 6/2/92 PROPERTY OWNER NAME: PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS: Ph. Nicholas & Antonina Kairez P.O. Box 1154 Lynnwood WA 98016 TENANT NAME: TENANT ADDRESS: Ph. George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive 771-9554 COMPLAINANT NAME: COMPLAINANT ADDRESS Ph. CODE SECTIONS VIOLATED: VIOLATION: 19.00(UBC 7003); 19.00(UBC 202(d));18.45.020 Grading without a permit, Clearing without a permit, Working under an official stop work order. SURROUNDING LAND USE APPLICABLE PERMITS AND FILES: Residential SF ZONE DISTRICT: ATN: RS-12 0727-043-001-00 REPORT: On Friday, May 29, 1992, Jim Walker , asst. city engineer, requested I investigate a complaint of illegal grading at 9117 Olympic View Drive he had received by phone. Mr. Walker stated this site had a history of problems and that the property owner had been contacted a number of times in attempt to resolve the problems. Before leaving to investigate the complaint, I contacted John Bissell, City Code Enforcement Technician, about problems he had on the site. Mr. Bissell informed me he was currently investigating violations of the city's clearing ordinance on that site. Some large trees had been removed from the site without the necessary permits and clearing had begun, again without the necessary permits. It seemed Mr. George Kairez, son of the property owners, had contacted the city in October of 1991, requesting information on "clearing".When Mr. Kairez was told a permit was necessary before such work could be started, he demanded an explanation, in writing, for the requirement. Ed Somers, associate planer for the city, responded to Mr. Kairez's request the following day, explaining why a clearing permit was required) Mr. Bissell will file a separate report detailing the history of enforcement actions on this site. 1 AT about 10:00 am on May 29, Steve Bullock, Planing intern and I, visited 9117 Olympic View Drive to investigate the illegal grading complaint. We observed the following; We observed three sections of a recently cut tree lying on the right side of the driveway about 50' from the entrance. On the left side of the drive approximately 30' further in , or 80' total from entrance, we observed the stump of a cut tree pushed on top of a new cut into the bank adjacent the drive. It appeared the new cut into the bank was made to accommodate vehicle parking. A "step van" was backed into this new cut. We continued into the site to the home where we observed a large portion of the "rear yard" had been stripped of all grass and vegetation, exposing bare earth. A "back hoe" was in operation removing the stumps of recently cut trees. We further observed segments of large trees lying along the edge of the steep bank on the western boundary of the property. We where then met by a male who identified himself as Mr. George Kairez, the property owner. I identified my self as the building official for the City of Edmonds and notified Mr. Kairez we were ordering him to "Stop Work" at once for grading without the required permits. I handed Mr. Kairez a copy of the "Stop Work" order and posted the order on the site. Mr. Kairez became quit agitated, arguing he wasn't grading but merrily maintaining his lawn. Mr. Kairez, Steve Bullock and I walked the site while Mr. Kairez repeatedly agreed he was only doing lawn maintenance. I continue to repeat the city's position that the work he was doing was grading. 1?// 7 C)U6 During our conversation Mr. Kairez conveyed to me his intention to till all of the area that he had cleared and to replant grass. He also mentioned he intended to push the debris on site over the high slope bank. I told Mr. Kairez that I could not permit him to push the debris over the bank and asked that he not do that. Mr. Kairez asked if I would allow his back hoe operator to finish filling the hole he was working on since he was near finished and since Mr. Kairez did not want to have the operator return at a latter date. I agreed to allow the following work to be completed under the stop work order and made a point to insure Mr. Kairez understood the extend of the work I would allow; 1. I would allow the back hoe operator to fill the hole he had dug to remove the stump, that would required about 30 yards of dirt to fill. 2. I would allow two small piles of debris, about 10' in diameter and 6' height, to be moved to the northern end of the Property where they would be added to an existing larger pile. 3. I didn't want any other work done on the site without first obtaining the required permits. I again repeated I didn't want the larger pile of debris, about 15' in diameter and 12' high, to be pushed over the bank. Mr. Kairez agreed to the condition and further stated he would come into the office that day to apply for the necessary permits. On my return to the office I found Mr. Kairez waiting. He filled out the necessary application for permits and supplied us with plans. We accepted his application and routed it to planning and engineering for review. During the application process, I asked Don Fiene, Hydraulics engineer for the city, to review the plot plan and make recommendations on the need for erosion control. In an attempt to response quickly, Mr. Fiene agreed to follow Mr. Kairez to the site to review the soil and slope conditions. On their return I spoke with Mr. Fiene. He felt there was enough of a natural vegetation buffer to control any erosion and therefore didn't require any additional erosion control. I explained to Mr. Kairez the application would be routed to the planning department for review before the permit could be issued. Mr. Kairez left. About 20 minutes after Mr. Kairez left, staff discovered that a "Critical Areas Review" was necessary for the site. Mr. Kairez was contacted, and he returned to the office and completed the Critical Areas Checklist. On arrival at the office -on Monday, June 1, 1992, 1 was advised by staff that complaints had been received regarding work that had been done on the site over the weekend. John Bissell and I returned to the site to investigate the new complaint. When we arrived on site we found Mr. Kairez had indeed be working over the weekend. The area cleared and graded had increase at least twice in size. The grassy buffer zone to prevent erosion was now gone. We witnessed the back hoe operator in the act of pushing the large pile of debris over the bank. I questioned the operator why he was pushing the pile over the bank when I had specifically asked that not be done. He responded that he thought we said not to bum the pile. At this point Mr. Kairez arrived on the scene. I asked why he had done more than we had agreed to and why he had pushed the debris over the bank after I had asked that he not do so. He responded that he had forgotten to tell the operator not push the pile over the bank and that the operator didn't know not to. He further stated that he felt he wasn't grading and was not in violation of the "Stop Work". A heated agreement resulted ending with name calling on Mr. Kairez part and a promise of a citation by myself. Before leaving I restated the city's position. Grading was being conducted on his site and I wanted all work to stop until permits were issued. CONCLUSION: I believe Mr. Kairez had knowledge of the cities requirements in this case because he had been contacted on a number of occasions about tree cutting and clearing and he had a grading application under review. Mr. Kairez was also advised of the permit requirements and ordered to stop work. It would seem Mr. Kairez choose to complete the work in violation of the stop work order and without the permits required by the ECDC. ACTION: I recommend Mr. Kairez be cited for violation of ECDC Chapter 19.00.000 , UBC §203(d) working when ordered to stop work and for a second violation of ECDC Chapter 19.00.000, UBC §7003 Grading Permit Required. REPORTING OFFICIAL Dick Mumma, Building Official M MICRO DATA OLfunA1NE1ANmm ❑ INFRACTION' CRIMINAL] �� TRAFFIC ID NON-TRAFFICI 0046320 O STATE OF WAS NGTON O COUNTY OF S OHOMISH .PLAINTIFF VS. NAMED DEFENDANT SxCMaONM OF EDMONDS IN THE ❑ DISTRICT [e( MUNICIPAL COURT OF EDMONDS _ wASHINGiDN WASHIINGTON NGLC :8li"T WA mime vj THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES AND SAYS THAT IN THE STATE O� N EX%RFS 16OGAl SEWRITV DRIVER'S LICENSE NO STATE NAME LAST FIRST INITIAL I ER O KAIREZ, GEORGE P. NEEDED ADDRESS 0IF NEW ADDRESS 9117 Olympic View Drive aPISSENGER CITY STATE ZIPCODE EMPLOYER Edmonds, WA I _ _ SE% RACE IE„GHT WRIGHTEVE5 HAIR RENDENTIAL PHONE NO. M ! 1 771-9554 VIOLATION DATE MONTH DAY YEAR TIME ON OR ABOUT 06 01 92 EA HOUR AT LOCATION MV CITY/COUNTVOF 9117 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Snohomish Ulu UPIVWA VEHIIXELICENSE HO.Ic1111, 9TATEM EFRREB YVEH.VR. MARE Ycn" ODEL^ BSI ^ICOLIXI MILER YI UCEX96 NO. STATE F%RflES 1, 11IL11 ."'I N0 STATE EMPIRES ITR.YR. WNERKAMPAXY IE OTHER THAN DRIVER ADDRE56 CITY STATE ZIP CODE ACCIDENT RAC IKOYE$ XAZARD DYES 'E%EMPT OLARM OFIRE NO PO l G RGOIHG VEHICLE ONO PLAGflO ONO I VEHICLE DRV 0OTHEA DID THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSESANFRACTIONS L v104nOx5TATUTE CODE DESCRIPTION VEHICLE SPEED IN ZONE OFA€R CDC 19.00.000 adD tang UBC 202(d) and ECDC 19.00.080°an" R.VIOIATONSTATUTE LODE OESCRIPLION PENALTY/BAIL LLS. FUNDS Mendt. PBTMNCE MO. DV. YR. TIME AM. BOOKING OPTE P.M. DATE GATE NOTICE ISSUED WITHOUT ADMITTING HAVING CONMITTEO SUCH OF uvnrannNrt n NINE E ABOVE INFPACTIONS/OFFEHSES yROMI$E TO :^ ^'v^b ^lu^IeAUE^NBM^Y[tlnlnlmmasE rt RESPONDASOIRECTED ON THIS NOTICE. AA ^ wexl Aae ?+�W In FDc Chu-BisS'e11TMe¢n _Dick M_ I X�Investie"a pion) -- — — GIATURE I S ONUS _.. wA . O FN RESPONSE ISPOSITIONI LRG PLEA GIG FINDING FINE SUSPENDED' SUBTOTAL ?'. IF G AD DxL OP I G Na � C NC C NC DPI 2 G NG G NG D IF I 5 !i o10BFS ITH N M eeRYED N „DD DATE SU`siENICERNS� s MILED EM, O XONVTEN$IGI LICENSE TOTAL `� ToOLYMi TOOLVNPIP OF SUSPENDED _OF BJSPp19pX ISURRENDEA DATE COSL S MST WASHINGTON UNIFORM COURT DOCKET -COURT COPY WASHINGTON UNIFORM ABSTRACT OF COURT RECORD -DOL COPY _ WASHINGT-QN-UNIFORM NOTICE OF IN"ACTIO&DEF91 DANTS COPY _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EDMONDS MUNICIPAL COURT SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS, ) NO. 46320 ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT ) V. ) GEORGE P. RAIREZ, ) ) Defendant. ) ) The above -named defendant is hereby accused of the crime of violating a stop work order, committed as follows: That the defendant in the City of Edmonds, Washington on or about June 1, 1992, Cleared and graded an area in excess of two times the area that had originally been observed by the inspector on May 29, 1992 when the stop work order was issued, had removed a grassy buffer zone that existed on May 29, 1992 when the stop work order was issued, and was in the act of pushing a large pile of debris over the bank with a backhoe; and On May 29, 1992 the building official had both served the defendant with a stop work order and posted the stop work order on site, and had verbally informed the defendant to cease all work and to return to the City's office for applications, etc.; and Complaint - 1 TAR22265.1 P/0".040.0W Law Offices of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 8, 9i 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 That on May 29, 1992, the defendant did appear at the building office, and make application for grading to be reviewed by the City; and - The City discovered a critical areas review was necessary, and the defendant completed a critical areas checklist on May 29, 1992; and - On May 29, the building official specifically informed the defendant he was not to do any work at all except to finish filling one hole from the removal of a stump, and to move two small piles of debris about 10 feet in diameter by 6 feet in height to the north end of the property; and - On May 29, the building official specifically informed the defendant he was not to push debris in the large pile over the bank; and Defendant was never issued any permits, etc. by the City; and Defendant is in control of said property. Said acts are contrary to the Uniform Building Code Section 202(d) and 205, and City Code Section 19.00.000 adopting the Uniform Building Code by reference, and Section 19.00.080 making it a misdemeanor to violate any provisions of the Uniform Building Code, and contrary to the peace and dignity of the State of Washington. DATED this J day of U , 1992. EDMONDS CITY ATTOR*F-YS OFFICE.`) Complaint - 2 TAR22265.1P/0006.0Q.0M By: Theresa A. Romano -Preston City Attorney's Office Law Offices of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 The above -signed prosecutor does certify, under penalty of perjury, that she has reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that the defendant committed the offense, contrary to law. Complaint - 3 TAR22265.1 P/0006.040.00f3 Law Offices of OGDEN MU"HY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 IN MICRO OATAOLVWIAIM 404M O INFRACTION CRIMINAL !d TRAFMRC ®HON-TRAFFIC 0046319 D STATEOFWASH GTON a COUNTY OF SN HOMISH .PLAINTIFF VS. NAMED DEFENDANT Q[CITYITOWN OF EDMONDS INTHELJ UIS I HIUI L MUNNAYPL WUNI Vr c Wisiurvorox SNOHOMISH _Ad 131-133 wI WA D3/02L THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES AND SAYS THAT IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DRIVER'S LICENSE NO. STATE IECRPE$ SODMISECDflITY NUMBER AME LAST FIRST IN TIAL 0INTERPRETER KAIREZA_ GEO_RGE p. NEEDED ADDRESS G IF NEW ADDRESS 9117 Olympic -View Drive aPASSENGER Crtr Edmonds, WA STATE -FP CODE �EmPLovER y% EIGHT WEIGHT EYES XAIfl R EBIBMTnrioNENO. M RACE H 1 771-9554 VIOLATION DRTE NUNTX MY YEAR TIME ON OR ABOUT 05 29 92 24 HOUR AT LOCATION M.P. - CITY/COUNTY OF 9117 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, Snohomish v nimw,..,...,................................. ... ............._ EXICLELICENSEIq. STATE �E%PIIIES IVEN.YR. IMANE MODEL STYLE COLOR PILFA FI LICFNBE HO. LTE :EXPIRES iTR.YR. EiRAILERR JIENSE NO. STATE E%PPES 'TR VR. OAVtflERJCOMPANV IF OTHER THAN DRIVER ADDRESS CITY STPTE 31P CODE ACCIDENT 9AC WMABICIK^VE$ XRZARO OYES E%MMPT OFARM OFIRE 6...... P O OTIIFA 010 THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSES/INFRACTIONS VNnATION ITATUTECOOE DESCNPTION VEHICLE SPUD INA ZONE DRAMA ECDC 19.00.�0�dJI Jug lEJJX , g><ad�.Dg_withoy. DAMA grading permit. 2VIOLATI0NTCATUTECODE INSCRIPTION PENALTY/BAIdMONDSWA U.S. FUND FFARANCE NO. DY. YR. FINE AM. SOONING 0<TEND DATE P.M. DATE ISSUE WITHOUT ADMITTING HAVING COMMITTED EACH OF Try pBpVE IXFMLTIONS/OFFENSES Po10MISE TO _ _ _ _ _ fl6PDXp ASOIRECTmUN TNIENOTICE m ck MXLQTFDEfefEogNa-:jon) INFRACTION CGMPLAIN CITATION PENALTY fiINF RESPONSE OI$POPTION,DIG� PLEA CNG FINDING SUSPENDED I SUB -TOTAL C S1 O NO ONO O P! 1' O NO i G NO O Of f--Y IS �f 2 C NC C NC D P 2 G HE G NO D BF S i f f L G s E L �y JMONINITOME :SFANE�VA SIISPEH NO TIME 9ERVMFO WEA 1- ABSNIACT"LED IREGOMMENDED NONENTENSION LUCRERM OTPL L TO OLVWIA IOF SUSPENSION PENOEA RATE ,QMR S WASHINGTON UNIFORM COURT DOCKET -COURT COPY WASHINGTON UNIFORM ABSTRACT OF COURT RECORD - DOL COPY WASHINGTON UNIFORM NOTICE OF INFRACTION -DEFENDANTS COPY D i J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13, 14I 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EDMONDS MUNICIPAL COURT SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS, V. GEORGE P. KAIREZ, Plaintiff, Defendant. NO. 46319 COMPLAINT The above -named defendant is hereby accused of the crime of grading, (excavation or the mechanical removal of earth material,) without a grading permit from the building official; committed as follows: That the defendant in the City of Edmonds, Washington on or about May 29, 1992, - Caused the stump of a cut tree to be pushed on top of a new cut in the bank adjacent to the drive; and Caused a cut into the bank that was made to accommodate vehicle parking moving substantial earth; and Stripped a large portion of the rear yard of all grass and vegetation, exposing bare earth; and Complaint - 1 TAR222&.1 P/0006.0W.0W LAW Offices of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Removing several stumps of recently cut trees with a backhoe, and - Had moved large trees, debris and earth, etc. to the edge of a steep bank on the west side of the property; and Did move approximately 30 yards of fill dirt to fill a hole from removal of a large tree; and Caused excavation or fill total in excess of 50 cubic yards; and Defendant was never issued any permits by the City; and Defendant is in control of subject property. Said acts are contrary to the Uniform Building Code Section 7003, the City Code Section 19.00.000 adopting the Uniform Building Code by reference, and Section 19.00.080 making the violation a misdemeanor, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Washington. DATED this — day of �� , 1992. EDMONDS CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE By: J/� -Z Th resa A. Ro o-Preston City Attorney's Office The above -signed prosecutor does certify, under penalty of perjury, that she has reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that the defendant committed the offense, contrary to law. Complaint - 2 TAR222&.1 P/0006.040.003 Lea Officer of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 MICRO DATA OLYMNA IMP 40,13011 ❑ INFRACTION CRIMINALI ❑ TRAFFIC ® NON -TRAFFIC 0046318 O STATE OF WISH Si JWA H J�GTON .. D COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH .PLAINTIFF VS NAMED DEFENDANT 7p CITY/TOWN OF EDMONDS STATEOF L COURT ND,nF°N SNOHOMISH Nclxoi _ 1-31-133 _«EDI-G WA 031021J WE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES AND SAYS THAT IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE NO. jSiRTI E E%P� IRES ISCCiwL SECURITY NUMBER NAME: LAST FIRST INITIAL 0INTERPRETER EAIEEZ GE02G_E_ P. NEEDED ADDRESS 0IF NEW ADDRESS 9117 Olympic View Drive 0PASSENGER CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMPLOYEfl Edmonds, WA SEA MCE AT F IRTX WEICJIT T EYES RESIDENTIAL PNONENO. �HFIGHT 'XAIfl 771-9554 VILEPLAI TE DAY YFgfl TIME OH OR gIBOUT 05 21 92 AT LOCATION M.P. CITY/COUNTY OF 9117 Ol is View Drive, Edmonds, Snohomish DID OPEMTETHE MOMMO VEHICLE/MOT OR VEHICLE ON A PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND VEHICLE LICENSE NO. STATE EXPIRES VEX.YR. MAKE I MODEL STYLE {COLOR TRAILIM 01 LICENSE NO. TATE EXPRES ITTLYR. RAILER IV LICEN5E NO. STg E E%NR6 TR.YR. OVINERIGGIMPANYIPOIN1,H TXANUMVtM ADDRESS CITY STATE Or WOE gCC10ENT C FROUP0 YES HAZARD O YES EXEMPT D FARM 0 FIRE HO EDIF EARML IVEHIME ONO PLACURD ONO VEHICLE ORV. 0OTHER DID THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACH OF WE FOLLOWING OFFENSES/INFRACTIONS _ 1 NOIATIONRTAIDTE WDE DESCRIPTION VEHICLE SPEED 1 A ZONE ORPRCER ECDC 18.45.020, 1,.45.040(c) - _Eng�ing inorcausing�nw an [o e c eare without an clearing permit. ZVOLATIONSTATUTECDDE DESCRIPTION ENALTV/BAIL U.S. FUNDS 14andt. PPEALVWCE MO. Of. VIC TIME AM. UVVKI G GATE NOT DATE I I I P.M DATE ISSUED WITHOUT ADMITTING HAVING LOMMITT[D EACH OFmem THE ABOVE I FF&lIlr pFFENSES I IMPISH TO areww� I i .w.'.Fuano RESPOND g501RECTEU ON TNI$HOT{CE. nFR IME yM.E x3FNIwMAP n FTp� UN OFFICER JOkn-BiseeT NUMBER 7i Inves[i ationZ__ F - — A A E EDMONDS ._ .WA DEFENDANP$G SNATURE INFRACTION COMPLAINT/CIT TIO PENALTY IMF RE$IUNSE ISPO$TONj CRGI PLEA GIG FINDING FINE SUSPENDEDI SUBTOTAL O — o L NO C NC O P I 1 G NG G NG 0 BF f S f 2 O NO C NL O P 1 P G N6 I G NG O OF f S f CJ I 3 f 3 (A) JUDGMENT DATE $E W IR PITRVE SUSPDLEDTMESEROVED COS!$3 A D3TMCT ENDED RECOMMENDED NONEOENNON `IGO4E m'si's Q] TO OLYMM OFISPENSION S SURRENDER DATE WASHINGTON UNIFORM COURT DOCKET -COURT COPY .� WASHINGTON UNIFORM ABSTRACT OF COURT RECORD - DOL COPY .. - WASHINGTON UNIFORM NOTICE OF INFRACTION -DEFENDANTS COPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EDMONDS MUNICIPAL COURT SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS, ) NO. 46318 ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT V. ) ) GEORGE P. KAIREZ, ) ) Defendant. ) The above -named defendant is hereby accused of the crime of clearing without a clearing permit, committed as follows: That the defendant in the City of Edmonds, Washington on or about May 21, 1992, - Engaged in or caused land to be cleared by cutting down or significantly cutting back trees, brush, or other vegetation, specifically cutting down one tree one foot in diameter, and another tree four and one half to five feet in diameter and removing the stumps etc.; and Defendant was never issued any permits by the City; and Defendant is in control of subject property. Said acts are contrary to the City Code Section 18.45.020, 26 /// Complaint - 1 TAR2M62.1 P/0006.040.003 Law Offices of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14' 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 punishable as a misdemeanor under Section 18.45.070, and against the peace and dignity of the -rState of Was )ton. DATED this 5 /v\ day of v U� , 1992. EDMONDS CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE By: heresa A. Rozz -Preston City Attorney's Office The above -signed prosecutor does certify, under penalty of perjury, that she has reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that the defendant committed the offense, contrary to law. Complaint - 2 TAR22262.IP/0006.040.003 Law Offices of OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 2100 Westlake Center 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1686 (206) 447-7000/FAX: (206)447-0215 890-199- CITY OF EDMONDS LAURAM.HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N.. EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning e Parks and Recreation a Engineering DIRECTOR • r •_ r // / �. TF.1• il i I Re: Transmitting: 't_ /1 AS YOU REQUESTED FOR YOUR FILE STREo. F�sv��E Project No.: FOR YOUR INFORMATION v FOR POSTING IN PUBLIC PLACE AS WE DISCUSSED V FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION Remarks: _Piuir.�, ra AgiId be u-,wd a� +hi5 *-Lye- of ryas- -to reduce r"u;reweAs acid ot-oduc a a qa�2 dow-f cover- (12or avide6es Z glau u0u -irks rr+or"ircA). O1- U 1�h^iviiwal seedbad i2rargrAkoj" WW )e, rlejej uou Y Si+e F&ke S1i:tcice ro _6 and Wr, d Ar--f t7wt �-u h Y)7d er Wifh rr►e*Y1 -al 'I�uf Wi 11 11ri Sid it tItA`u diAur11 la)' -SDO 11J a)aw SUhSGiIs b ; nto -f�P +-LS)2 Sai) • S nature _Tdrhr? S C, WO . A S;s crr CU tny;neer Printed Name and Title TRNSMTL/TXTFORMS • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan BUILDING NG DEN ff E�PHY LA E June 5, 1992 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Seattle Office. 2100 Weetleke Center Tower 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101.1686 (206)447.7000 FAX (206) 447-0215 Mr. Ge a P. Kairez 911 Olympic View Drive onds, WA 98020 Re: Code Violations Dear Mr. Kairez: JUN 11 1992 JUN 6 1992 John D. Wallace R. Miller Adams Douglas E. Albright Charles D. DeJong Lee Corkrum John F. DeVleming Wayne D. Tanaka Robert T. Dollinger Andr6 ead Robert G*GR rl? Milton H. Doumit Kathleen C. Healy e Kent C. Meyer / C.Y. Pend saica r C esaice G. Rickard s A. Rozzano Christopher A. Washington James E. Haney eresa Susan N. Slonecker Phillip C. Raymond Gil Sparks Charles D. Zimmerman Carol D. Bernasconi Counsel to the Firm William F. Joyce Stanbery Foster, Jr. Karen Sutherland Rose D. Jacobson David A. Ellenhorn John J. O'Donnell Of Counsel James A. Murphy Retired Raymond D. Ogden, Jr. Enclosed please find your copies of citations that have been filed with the Edmonds Municipal Court for violations of the Edmonds Community Development Guide and the Uniform Building Code. Also attached are your copies of the official complaints that are filed with the Edmonds Municipal Court. Finally, attached is a copy of several reports that are filed by different City officials regarding the violations contained within the complaints and the citations. Because of the history and your previous actions on this case, I am informing you that if any further violations occur, the City will seek an arrest warrant from the judge at the Edmonds Municipal Court, to have you placed in custody until the case is heard at trial. If you have any questions, please contact John Bissell or Dick Mumma at the City of Edmonds. Very truly yours, OGDEN MURPHY 71;-1410 Theresa A. Rozzano-Preston TAR/srh Enclosure cc: John Bissell/ Dick Mumma✓ David Steiner TA)MOSIM/OOOi ANM Wenatchee Office: 1 South Chelan Streek P. 0. Box 1606, Wenatchee, WA 98807, (509) 882.1954, FAX (509) 883.1553 Interoffice Memo To: Theresa Rozzano, City Attorney IREer From: Dick Mumma, Building Official Date: June 5 1992 Subject: Estimate of graded yardage at 9117 Olyview Drive On Friday, May 29, 1992, while investigating a complaint of illegal grading at 9117 Olympic View Drive in the City of Edmonds, I observed grading in excess of 50 cubic yards as follows; Grading of surface area of approximately 3/4 areas to a depth of 1 to 3 inches that was performed with a "back hoe" tractor to remove vegetation. An area about 150' x 200' had been cleared to the north of the residence or about 3/4 areas. 150ft x 200ft x (2/12)ft = 5000 cu. ft. / 27 (convert to cu. yds) = 185 Cu Yds. I observed three piles of debris on site, two small and one large. I will only consider the large pile at the north end of the site. It was about 15' in diameter and 12' high. The area of the base of the pile is 176 sq. ft., using an average of 6' height the cubic footage would be 1060 cu. ft. / 27 to convert to cubic yards, the pile would have contained 39 cubic yards I also observed excavation of a tree stump that Mr. Kairez calculated himself to be about 30 cubic yards. 185 + 39 + 30 = 254 cubic yards > 50 cubic yards. On my return to the site on June 1, 1992, I found Mr. Kairez had graded an at least another 3/4 areas or another 177 yards. yardage. mn 890 199- CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering To: I Gk A/Mrncl u� O tc 4 Re: 7/1-7 v/ Transmitting: r ,�q Date: Project No.: fit.✓ �raG�n AS YOU REQUESTED _K FOR YOUR FILE FOR YOUR INFORMATION >C FOR POSTING IN PUBLIC PLACE AS WE DISCUSSED FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN LAURA M. HALL MAYOR PETER E: HAHN DIRECTOR FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION / p► Remarks: V I.S t),g ���. I P Sp,ec4e d S t e q ! �� 7 �Pt c- y t e. mi o G e e ®' � p Cro x 1 M g 1 e 1 t" Of 1/C 2't �`� c a ,• a sole/ v - A 2 cirJtne,/ h Uu V ec{ 17 n'I C� 1 C� i4'IonS f�1gS e (3�qCif-r-e iC (q3,,�60 �cr)X�2�/,z,� f� C-E�p1o,l) S, �f y 5 f4- 37= Z o /_m 7 !j-G(3 off xccy 4-t t0, TRNSMTL/TXTFORMS L,,1 b-1-, nature ) on S ie, nted Name a d"5U/, cT E-,iSthz-e.f , P. �. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan F_.s,rr• CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT PETER E. HAHN j p Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering DIRECTOR 89p 19C� STREET FiLk Date: 6 :S C 2 Project No.: � Z GM 1 F-A dw- Re: Transmitting: AS YOU REQUESTED FOR YOUR INFORMATION' t� AS WE DISCUSSED FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR YOUR FILE FOR POSTING IN PUBLIC PLACE FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN - - /�' ����� ��f . "_ [fir• y JrA _ AkT& 11 t/ ' fro, w am, MAI it r O. TRNSMTL/TXTFORMS • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan T STREET EILEr� ��- � 7-- < .�_ �-: - Critical Areas Checklist RECEIVED Site Information MAY 2 9 1992 Project Name: 117(/7VNI#�' it Number. _ pr a WER Site Location: 9.07 OLYA06 V(0,'Property Account Number- -Tc�d Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 3 ®wee Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? General Site Conditions acweleler"Vr � 1. Has the site been cleared or logged?Sfi Date of most recent action: Soils / Topography 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. --Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a. horizontal distance of 66. feet.) Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments Hydrology/Vegetation 4. Site contains areas of ear -round standing water. r y g 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. N Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 7. Site contains a cr Wl" n area where water flovgs oss the grounds surface? j iflows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is forested : meadow ;shrubs _;mixed primarily: 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: 90 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: For. Use Only... :WAIVER :Critical areas study is nbt'required.. j Determination Number.. -Reviewer. Planer Rey 3n7/9z a90-19'1 Cityof Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist. The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form -is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a developmentpermit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed. to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or. his/her representative, must fillout the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review% the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and ma1w a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: George Kairez Name Owner Rep. Title 9117 Olympic View Drive Street Address Edmonds, WA 98026 City, State, ZIP Phone Applicant Representative: Name Title Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone __ Signature Date Signature Date MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION June 14, 1993 TO: FILE CA-92-91 VIA: ROB CHAVE, PLANNING MANAGER FROM: JOHN BISSELL AICP, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN SUBJECT: THREE PARTY CONTRACT FOR STUDY OF SLOPE STABILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE. On June 5, 1992 the City of Edmonds issued a citation to George Kairez for clearing and grading without a permit on the property located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. As Part of enforcement Mr. Kairez was uired to. obtain a clearing permit for the clearing. Prior to the processing of a clearing permit, a critical areas study was required to assess the stability of the slope to the west of the subject property, and any reductions in stability created by the clearing and the pushing of debris over the top of the bank of the slope, and list any mitigation or repair measures. Section 20.15B.150 requires the City, the Applicant, and the Consultant conducting the study to enter into a three party contract. In this case the applicant hired Geotech Consultants to perform the required study without entering into a three party contract. The City believes that the consultant who performed the work was qualified to perform the work. The City also believes that the information presented in the consultant's report answered the question about the slope stability. The City understands that the applicant did not enter into the three party contract as required by code. However, the applicant has been cited and there have been numerous court hearings. The citation was issued nearly one year before the writing of this memorandum. In addition the property owner has submitted preliminary plans for subdivision review for a larger parcel which includes all of the property that was originally of concern. This new application will require both critical areas review and SEPA review. This larger parcel includes all of the property that was originally of concern. Therefore, due to the extreme amount of time spent on the. enforcement of this case, and the inclusion of the property in a new development application, the City hereby waives the requirement of the three party contract and considers the study complete. The critical areas study does not recommend any mitigations. The clearing work was done over one year ago, and the grasses and other natural vegetation on the site have grown back. Therefore there is no need for erosion control mitigation. Any future work will be reviewed separately with a new critical areas review. /41TA-#' 07,? / - 0,13 - Oo.1.- 60.. .. Critical Areas Checklist RECEIVED Site Information STRECT � MAY 2 9 1992 Project Name: 1" �--i'crmit Number. PERMIT CQ�1,,�'ER Site Location: WI O&WA& V(P'Property PXAccount Number. 77M Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? General Site Conditions 41 G.-f cfar"V 1. Has the site been cleared or logged?�Sf-�E'� Date of most recent action: Soils / Topography •� 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. --,Rolling-. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a. horizontal distance of 66 feet) Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15%and less tan h30% (a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments Rev 3/27/92 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION July 6, 1992 TO: JEFFREY S. WILSON, AICP, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR FROM: JOHN BISSELL, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN SUBJECT: CRITICAL AREAS STUDY FACTS AND CONDITIONS . CA-92-91 Lot located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. Antonin Kairez has submitted a critical areas checklist for property located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. The property is mapped as an area of unstable slopes on the Critical Areas Map. A site inspection of the property revealed steep slopes with a substantial amount of vegetation. Subsequent site inspections revealed that much of the vegetation was cleared from the slopes without permits. Therefore a Critical Areas study is required to determine slope stability and mitigating measures to restore the site. The critical areas study must be conducted by a geotechnical engineer and a wildlife biologist. The study should present facts, conclusions and mitigating measures for site restoration. In addition to the required study the applicant is required to follow the conditions listed below: 1. The applicant must provide the City with a grading and clearing plan which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 2. The applicant must provide the City with a re -vegetation plan which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 3. The applicant must follow all erosion control measures imposed by the City Engineering Division which conforms to the recommendations of the required study 4. The applicant may dispose of graded material in an approved manner. The applicant may not dispose of any graded material by pushing the material over the side of the western bank. 5. The applicant may not grade any material or remove any vegetation from the side of the western bank. If you concur with these conditions, please indicate your concurrence below J fr y S. ilson, AICP, Current Planning Supervisor P 7 . f i i By'order of the Building Official for the City of :Eamon .......... All Persons Are Ordered TR- T p1L WORK AT ONCE Pursuant to Section 202(d) of the Uniform Building Code the Building Official for the City of Edmonds hereby orders all work to STOP at the site listed below. Address: For the following reason(s): • WARNING Posted this day of AAa The failure to stop work, or the resuming of work without permis- sion from the Building Official, or the removal, mutilation, or concealment of this notice is punishable by fine and imprison- ment. STArg 0 CURT SMITCH CF Director ��� �y11889 aoy S 6m STATE Of WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 16018 Mill Creek Blvd.. Mill Creek. WA 98012 May 14, 1993 Jeff Wilson Planning Supervisor City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N Edmonds, WA 93020 Tel. (206) 775-1311 RE: GEORGE KAIREZ PROPERTY, 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DR., EDMONDS AND POTENTIAL BALD EAGLE CONFLICT Dear Mr. Wilson: Mr. Kairez asked that I write a letter to you stating my findings concerning the presence of a bald eagle nest in a tree he wished to cut on his property last year. At the time of my visit, there was no bald eagle nest that I could see in the tree that Mr. Kairez showed me. During the time Mr. Kairez was clearing his property, there were several reports from different homeowners near the above address stating that a bald eagle nest tree had been topped. I cannot confirm nor deny this claim but can verify that a new bald eagle nest has been built in the very near vicinity. If anything, the tree that Mr. Kairez cut was a significant perch tree, as are the remaining dominant trees in the Edmonds/Woodway area. There was no Bald Eagle Site Management Plan in place at that time and the tree on Mr. Kairez's property had not been formally designated as protected. A bald eagle site management plan initiated at the time of permit application when the application falls within a bald eagle territory would prevent such trees from being cut down or topped. Addresses and locations of Edmonds bald eagle territories will be forthcoming. Thank you for your interest and efforts to protect wildlife habitat. Please feel free to, call if you have any questions at 775-1311 ext. 111. Patricia A. Thompson Wildlife Biologist c. George Kairez .., STREET'FII-E • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS I NC �X SIC G _ c. 0% low. - 0X �IIG Q MEMORANDUM 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way) Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747.5618 To _Zb bj us. F)s 580w Attn. Page of From 1 G cC ar .,, a Date -93 % V 14 Job Number • • It AICL 00 � �'1I '�� � h � ' r r 1 � � ICI / •� i i I ,. / I 3r�e 9 ► 1 • CA CC: E 1 CITY OF EDMONDS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF A CRITICAL AREA STUDY George Kairez hereinafter referred to as "Proponent," , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," and the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City," for and in consideration of mutual promises contained herein agree and contract as follows: The City's Planning Official has determined that a Critical Area may exist on or near the subject property, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15.B. I1. The City is to direct and supervise preparation and finalization of a critical area study to describe the items in accordance with ECDC Section 20.15.B.150. I113. Paragraph IIB shall be applicable. only during the life of this contract. The work of the Consultant and the critical area study are for the purpose of providing the City with information and analysis, independent from the Proponent and the owner of the subject property. To that end, the Consultant shall, during the life of this agreement, perform no other services for Proponent with respect to the subject property. In addition, the Consultant shall not perform services for the Proponent with respect to other property or proposed developments without full disclosure thereof to the City. Proponent specifically agrees not to communicate with the Consultant, except for such communication as may be necessary for the Consultant to carry out the performance of this agreement. Any such communication between the Proponent and Consultant shall be carried on only in the presence of or withthe prior approval of the City. III. Proponent agrees to pay to Consultant in the manner set forth in Section VII below the reasonable costs of having the critical area study prepared. The Consultant has been recommended and selected by the City. Proponent understands and agrees to pay Consultant for actual time and materials expended in accordance with the scope of services set forth in Attachment "A" hereto, provided, however, that the total to be received by the Consultant for preparation of the critical area study shall not.exceed the sum of $ . Progress payments are to be issued to Consultant in accordance with the provisions of Sections VII and IX in this agreement. IV. The Proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both Consultant and the City so as to cause the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. The City agrees to make available to the Consultant all relevant information in the City's files. V. The scope of services contemplated by this agreement shall include preparation of a critical area study which shall be delivered to the City on or before VI. Consultant shall prepare and deliver to the City up to 5 copies of the critical area study. VII. Proponent shall, within ten (10) days of the signing of this agreement: (a) Deposit with the City of Edmonds funds sufficient to pay for the cost of preparation of the critical area study, but not less than $ subject to the provisions of subparagraph (b) below; (b) Agree to disbursement from time to time of funds on deposit in said account to pay for Consultant services covered by the Agreement. Page 1 of 4 CA92.91 GI b30.9LCRMCAL%CONTRACr 0 VIII. If the Proponent fails to deposit funds with the City as specified in Section VII of this agreement within the required ten days, this agreement shall terminate. IX. Consultant agrees to submit invoices for services and costs to date on a monthly basis along with a description of services rendered and a project progress report. The Consultant shall submit the original invoice to the City and a copy to the Proponent. The City shall pay the invoiced amount from the assigned account described in paragraph VII of this agreement within thirty (30) days of receipt if the work covered by the invoice has been satisfactorily completed. X. In the event the City, in its sole opinion determines there is a need for changes in the scope of work in Attachment "A," the City shall obtain from the Consultant an estimate of the total added charges and shall seek the Proponent's written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall then be amended to cover these changes, and the funds deposited accordingly to cover the changed scope of work. Failure to obtain such approval from the Proponent and to obtain an increase in the funds deposited to cover the proposed changes at the time of amendment, shall be grounds for suspension of work until agreement is reached. XI. The parties hereto agree that the critical area study and all supporting material therein submitted by the Consultant in the course of performing services under this agreement shall be, in the hands of the City of Edmonds, as public records and not subject to copyright. Consultant further agrees to make research notes and any other work products produced in performing this agreement available to the City for reproduction, upon completion of the critical area study, or sooner upon request by tfie, City. XII.. Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this proposal shall be governed by the laws of the City of Edmonds and the State of Washington. XIII. (a) The parties intend that an independent Consultant/City relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee, or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, or representative of the City or Proponent for any purpose. Employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits the City provides for City employees. The Consultant will be responsible for the acts of its employees, agents, and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to testify at any hearing concerning the project or the critical area study only if requested to do so by the City, unless pursuant to court order. (b) Consultant covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability, cost and expense, including reasonable attorne ' Pp� ��y 1 r, f connection with or occasioned, in whole or in part by any, cto or omission of Q, r Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, customers, or licensees, or arising from or out of Consultant's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement, regardless of whether it is alleged or proven that the acts or omissions of City, it officers, agents or employees caused or contributed thereto. With respect to the performance of this Agreement, and as to claims against City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties. This indemnity provision shall not apply in the event any acts or omissions of the City were the sole cause of any Page 2 of 4 CA92.91 CJI2.3a92•CRMCAL'COMrRACr such damage or injury. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees and the Consultant, its officers, agents, and employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and. employees. (c) In the performance of the services herein contemplated, the Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the work, subject to applicable regulations. However, the results of the work contemplated herein must meet the approval of the City, and shall be subject to the City's general rights of inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof, as required by ECDC Chapter 20.15.B. XIV. Proponent agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for breach of contract or other claim for damages brought by Consultant on account of any act or failure to act by the Proponent to pay the sums due under the terms of this Agreement. XV. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. XVI. The City reserves the right to suspend or terminate this agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and Proponent. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. The Consultant shall then invoice the City for all work performed in a satisfactory manner through the effective date of termination, and shall be paid by the City, subject to the limitations on liability contained in Paragraph IX; provided that if the termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, no payment shall be due. XVII. The Proponent reserves the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and City, and withdrawal of all related building, zoning, subdivision, and/or shoreline permit applications. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. XVIII. In the event that any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms of the Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party a sum for reasonable attorney's fees, including reasonable attorneys fees incurred prior to the filing of the action. M. Consultant agrees to report to the City any situation that might involve a possible conflict of interest in connection with the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall not have a financial interest in the proposal other than fees due under this Agreement. The Consultant will not perform any work or provide any services to any person in connection with or related to the Proposal, except as provided in this Agreement. The Consultant has listed in Attachment "B" all present contracts or work for the Proponent. XX. The Proponent agrees to provide the Consultant with a legal description of the project site, reproducible site plan or plans, copies of any relevant site studies produced by other consultants, and such other information as required by the Consultant. The proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both the City and Consultant so as to facilitate the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. XXI. This Agreement, including the Attachments hereto, represent the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and any negotiations, proposals, or agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by. this written Agreement. Page 3 of 4 CA92.91 C/12-30492.CRRtCAUCONTRACT ATTACHMENTS EXECUTED by the parties hereto this day of 1119 CITY OF EDMONDS: CONSULTANT, By By Laura Hall name: - a y» Ps F;/y y Mayor title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: By Rhonda March City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Scott Snyder City Attorney PROPONENT, By George Kairez PLANNING MANAGER: By Rob Chave, Manager Planning Division Attachments: "A" - Scope of Services "B" - Consultant/Proponent Contracts/Relationships Page 4 of 4 CA92.91 C/12-3492.CRf f ICAUCOWRACr STREET FILE March 18, 1993 James Finley Geotech Consultants Inc. 13256 N.E. 20th St. STE 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: GEOTECH Job # 92000 George Kairez Property located at 9117 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds Dear Mr. Finley: As you may recall, you and I discussed the Kairez property on the phone a couple of weeks ago. In that conversation I informed you that Mr. Kairez had illegally cleared his property without first obtaining a critical areas review or a clearing permit. In the process that followed the illegal clearing, it was discovered that there was a steep bank on the west side of the property over which cleared debris was pushed. Due to the a history of problems along other areas of this same bank the City became concerned about possible reductions in stability of the slope due to the illegal clearing. The property owner was informed of the City's concern, and informed that a critical areas study would be required using a three party contract to avoid a conflict of interest, as required by the Critical Area Ordinance. With this information, the property owner contracted your services and avoided the three party contract. The City has been advised by its legal council that a a study must be conducted according to the ordinance, even if the property owner has obtained services on his own accord. The study must address the items in the attached scope of work and must be done through a three party contract. We understand that it is possible that the work you have done addresses the issues in the scope of work, but that will not change the need for the study to be completed in accordance with the Critical Areas Ordinance. I have attached a copy of the three party contract prepared by the City Attorney. Be advised that this contract is a draft. The Critical Areas Ordinance requires a three party contract, but it does not specify format. If you have any concerns relating to this contract, please notify us or have your attorneys notify us of the concerns. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Sincerely, John Bissell Att. Scope of Work Three Party Contract SCOPE OF WORK FOR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY FOR CA-92-91 1. Geotechnical Study of the top of the bank in the vicinity where clearing has occurred or is proposed pursuant to the criteria established in ECDC sections 20.15.070.A.3 and 20.15B.120. This evaluation shall also include recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures if applicable. 2. Evaluation of bank stability or change in bank stability due to the dumping of material over the bank. This evaluation shall include recommendations as if the material had not bean dumped over the edge, and proposed mitigation measuresto correct any problems created by the dumping of material over the edge of the bank. CITY OF EDMONDS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF A CRITICAL AREA STUDY George Kairez hereinafter referred to as "Proponent," , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," and the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City," for and in consideration of mutual promises contained herein agree and contract as follows: I. The City's Planning Official has determined that a Critical Area may exist on or near the subject property, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15.B. II. The City is to direct and supervise preparation and finalization of a critical area study to describe the items in accordance with ECDC Section 20.15. B. 150. IIB. Paragraph IIB shall be applicable only during the life of this contract. The work of the Consultant and the critical area study are for the purpose of providing the City with information and analysis, independent from the Proponent and the. owner of the subject property. To that end, the Consultant shall, during the life of this agreement, perform no other services for Proponent with respect to the subject property. In addition, the Consultant shall not perform services for the Proponent with respect to other property or proposed developments without full disclosure thereof to the City. Proponent specifically agrees not to communicate with the Consultant, except for such communication as may be necessary for the Consultant to carry out the performance of this agreement. Any such communication between the Proponent and Consultant shall be carried on only in the presence of or with the prior approval of the City. III. Proponent agrees to pay to Consultant in the manner set forth in Section VII below the reasonable costs of having the critical area study prepared. The Consultant has been recommended and selected by the City. Proponent understands and agrees to pay Consultant for actual time and materials expended in accordance with the scope of services set forth in Attachment "A" hereto, provided, however, that the total to be received by the Consultant for preparation of the critical area study shall not .exceed the sum of $ Progress payments are to be issued to Consultant in accordance with the provisions of Sections VII and IX in this agreement. IV. The Proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both Consultant and the City so as to cause the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. The City agrees to make available to the Consultant all relevant information in the City's files. V. The scope of services contemplated by this agreement shall include preparation of a critical area study which shall be delivered to the City on or before VI. Consultant shall prepare and deliver to the City up to 5 copies of the critical area study. VII. Proponent shall, within ten (10) days of the signing of this agreement: (a) Deposit with the City of Edmonds funds sufficient to pay for the cost of preparation of the critical area study, but not less than $ subject to the provisions of subparagraph (b) below; (b) Agree to disbursement from time to time of funds on deposit in said account to pay for Consultant services covered by the Agreement. Page I of 4 CA92-91 C/12-30-92.CRrrICALXCONTRACT VIII. If the Proponent fails to deposit funds with the City as specified in Section VII of this agreement within the required ten days, this agreement shall terminate. IX. Consultant agrees to submit invoices for services and costs to date on a monthly basis along with a description of services rendered and a project progress report. The Consultant shall submit the original invoice to the City and a copy to the Proponent. The City shall pay the invoiced amount from the assigned account described in paragraph VII of this agreement within thirty (30) days of receipt if the work covered by the invoice has been satisfactorily completed. X. In the event the City, in its sole opinion determines there is a need for changes in the scope of work in Attachment "A,". the City shall obtain from the Consultant an estimate of the total added charges and shall seek the Proponent's written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall then be amended to cover these changes, and the funds deposited accordingly to cover the changed scope of work. Failure to obtain such approval from the Proponent and to obtain an increase in the funds deposited to .cover the proposed changes at the time of amendment, shall be grounds for suspension of work until agreement is reached. Xl. The parties hereto agree that the critical area study and all supporting material therein submitted by the Consultant in the course of performing services under this agreement shall be, in the hands of the City of Edmonds, as public records and not subject to copyright. Consultant further agrees to make research notes and any other work products produced in performing this agreement available to the City for reproduction, upon completion of the critical area study, or sooner upon request by the City. XII. , Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this proposal shall be governed by the laws of the City of Edmonds and the State of Washington. MI. (a) The parties intend that an independent Consultant/City relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee, or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, or representative of the City or Proponent for any purpose. Employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits the City provides for City employees. The Consultant will be responsible for the acts of its employees, agents, and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to testify at any hearing concerning the project or the critical area study only if requested to do so by the City, unless pursuant to court order. (b) Consultant covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability, cost and expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, in connection with or occasioned, in whole or in part by any act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, customers, or licensees, or arising from or out of. Consultant's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement, regardless of whether it is alleged or proven that the acts or omissions of City, it officers, agents or employees caused or contributed thereto. With respect to the performance of this Agreement, and as to claims against City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties. This indemnity provision shall not apply in the event any acts or omissions of the City were the sole cause of any Page 2 of 4 CA92-91 CI12-30-92.CRfRCAUCOKrRACT such damage or injury. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees and the Consultant, its officers, agents, and employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and. employees. (c) In the performance of the services herein contemplated, the Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the work, subject to applicable regulations. However, the results of the work contemplated herein must meet the approval of the City, and shall be subject to the City's general rights of inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof, as required by ECDC Chapter 20.15.B. XIV. Proponent agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for breach of contract or other claim for damages brought by Consultant on account of any act or failure to act by the Proponent to pay the sums due under the terms of this Agreement. XV. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. XVI. The City reserves the right to suspend or terminate this agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and Proponent. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. The Consultant shall then invoice the City for all work performed in a satisfactory manner through the effective date of termination, and shall be paid by the City, subject to the limitations on liability contained in Paragraph IX; provided that if the termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, no payment shall be due. XVII. The Proponent reserves the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant and City, and withdrawal of all related building, zoning, ,subdivision, and/or shoreline permit applications. If terminated or suspended, Consultant shall be entitled to receive reasonable compensation for services rendered to the date of termination or suspension. XVIII. In the event that any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms of the Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party a sum for reasonable attorney's fees, including reasonable attorneys fees incurred prior to the filing of the action. M. Consultant agrees to report to the City any situation that might involve a possible conflict of interest in connection with the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall not have a financial interest in the proposal other than fees due under this Agreement. The Consultant will not perform any work or provide any services to any person in connection with or related to the Proposal, except as provided in this Agreement. The Consultant has listed in Attachment "B" all present contracts or work for the Proponent. XX. The Proponent agrees to provide the Consultant with a legal description of the project site, reproducible site plan or plans, copies of any relevant site studies produced by other consultants, and such other information as required by the Consultant. The proponent agrees to cooperate reasonably with both the City and Consultant so as to facilitate the efficient and prompt preparation of the critical area study. XXI. This Agreement, including the Attachments hereto, represent the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and any negotiations, proposals, or agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded bythis written Agreement. Page 3 of 4 CA92-91 C/12-30-92.CRf1ICAUCONTRACT • ATTACHMENTS EXECUTED by the parties hereto this CITY OF EDMONDS: By Laura Hall Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: By Rhonda March City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of 19 CONSULTANT, By name: title: PROPONENT, By George Kairez PLANNING MANAGER: By By Scott Snyder Rob Chave, Manager City Attorney Planning Division Attachments: "A" - Scope of Services "B" - Consultant/Proponent Contracts/Relationships w Page 4 of 4 CA92-91 CA 2.30-92.CRrr1CAL%C0NTRACr • `t 18.30.080/9 /C�'� E.. Citv_'s Option. If the Public Works Director recommends that the City assume the maintenance of a drainage system, because the system provides a public benefit, the City Council may approve the maintenance of the system at the end of the first two year maintenance period. Before the Council accepts the system, the Public Works Director shall: 1. Determine by inspection that the system has11 satisfactorily completed according to the appr refle,40n; � 2. Review and report to the Council the owner's record of system expenses over the two year period. 3. Obtain deeds or easements from the owner to allow the City to maintain the system. 18.30.080 NEIGHBORHOOD DRAINAGE PLANS A. Preparation and Effect. The Public Works Director may prepare drainage plans for nehborhood areas. When a plan has been prepared, all drainage systems for development in the area covered by a plan shall be consistent with the plan. B. Neighborhood Drainage Facilities. When a drainage plan is required for a development in a location suitable for the construction of a drainage facility serving a neighborhood area, the Public Works Director may require that the owner pay an amount equivalent to the cost of a normal drainage system to the City, and grant the City permission to construct the neighborhood facility on the site, in lieu of constructingthe normally required drainage system. 18.30.090 GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES Any governmental entity beginning a development in the City shall comply with this chapter. 18.30.100 OTHER MEASURES The Public Works Director may order a property owner to take measures other than those listed in this chapter to protect the public health, safety and welfare from imminent dangers caused by erosion, flooding and other drainage related problems. 165 18.30 CHAPTER 18.30 DRAINAGE 18.30.000 PURPOSE The purposes of this chapter are: A. To maintain high quality surface water by protecting creeks, streams, ponds, lakes and other bodies of water from pollution by sediment, oil or other damaging substances. B. To protect land near development sites from increased surface water runoff rates which could cause erosion or flooding. C. To protect private and public Vroperty and city.streets and rights -of -way from flooding or,erosion. D. To promote development practices which will ensure that the above purposes are met. 18.30.020 DRAINAGE APPROVAL REQUIRED A. Drainage Plan. Before issuance of any development permit, and before development begins on any site, the developer shall submit a drainage plan and obtain approval from the Public Works Director. B. Installation of Drainage System. The drainage system shall be installed concurrently with site development, and shall be completed as shown on the approved plan before City approval of an occupancy permit or final inspection. C. Scope. 1. Development permit means: a. A building permit or other construction permit for a development which will result in more than 2000 square feet of previously uncovered land being covered with impervious surfacing. b. A grading permit, or a permit for a rockery or a retaining wall. C. Final approval of a subdivision or Planned.. Residential Development. 160 Theresa Rozzano Ogden Murphy And Wallace 2100 Westlake Tower 1601 Sth Av Seattle, WA 98101-1686 Dear Ms. Rozzano: STREET FILE The Planning and Building Divisions of the City of Edmonds is requesting that you issue a citation to George P. Kairez (9117 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026; D.O.B. 1/9/53) for grading without a permit, clearing without a permit, and working after the posting and service of a stop work order. I have included a report written by me which contains the code sections violated. In addition I have included copies of reports written by Ed Somers, Associate City Planner, Jim Walker, Assistant City Engineer, Steve Bullock, Planning Intern, and Dick Mumma, Building Official. These reports outline the steps that the City Staff has taken to obtain compliance. In this case, the person having control of the property has made it clear to the Staff that he has no intention of complying with City regulations. The work he is doing will probably irreparably damage the land as well as surrounding properties. Therefore I ask that you expedite this case to the fullest extent possible. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me or Dick Mumma at this office. Sincerely, John Bissell City of Edmonds Planning Division. 8 g 0_ l g y- CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering January 26, 1993 George Kairez 9117 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Conversation on January 21, 1993 Dear Mr. Kairez: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR As we discussed on January 21, 1993, you are required to obtain a clearing permit for any clearing already done on the site. If you believe that you will need to do additional clearing in the future, you may also request that on the same application. The City is in receipt of an application form and two copies of site plans for this application. The City still requires an adjacent property owners notification list, a description of completed work and a description of work to be done as well as a fee of $85.00. If you plan to do any work in addition to the work indicated on the site plan already submitted to the City, you will need to provide the City vdth an updated site plan. In addition to the clearing permit, you need to complete the critical areas study. On December 30, 1992 Jeffrey Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor sent a letter to you stating what you need to do to complete your critical areas study. I understand that you were waiting for a response from Robert Chave, Planning Manager, but Mr. Chave delegated the responsibility to Mr. Wilson. Therefore the letter sent to you by Mr. Wilson is the answer you needed. In the possibility that you did not receive the letter sent to you by Mr. Wilson, I have included a copy with this letter. I hope this letter clarifies the City requirement to bring your property into compliance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Sincerely John Bissell, AICP- Planning Division. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Permit No: Issue Date: J _ u l � G� T V1 t% T B l -4y -7 SE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) H. Charge: $ r <.. dmonds harmless from injuries, against the City of Edmonds or gs 'including defense costs and YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS THE APPLICANT. by the City Engineer. Every verifying completion of the atched with asphalt or City - on. TS AND ACKNOWLEDGE IMES FOR INSPECTIONS U I C & WORK 8� B/tL�p 1: EERING FINAL E EDMONDS DATE: ndout. C F. City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A`Address or Vicinity of Construction: q 17 �) I y44A A 1 B. Type of Work (be specific): T �u 4 v uv Np U� 11'q.1 I u 'I A, O c—, l � L. I c t 1 %i G (, � A- Q m_ A t P I C. Contractor: ,tic�w.1�� �� 0V0�° Contact: 22 �.J ss Mailing AddrerP _ s �.4 Cuff /l 99 -1141 Phone: �y 2 S �y ? State License #: _ :✓�M: Liability Insurance: S $ Bond D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable) E. ❑ Commercial E] Subdivision ❑City Project [-,� EU (C� pUD,'�iTE, P ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: ❑ YES NO .-�-"" G. SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ANO IDEMNITY. Applicant understaniis by his/her•signature'to this upplicdtioh'he/she holds the City of E damages or claims of any kind.or.descriptiori whatsoeyer,.for.,eseen ,o;znforeseen, that may be made any of its depart nts ort'employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedin attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS)RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTI I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREM Signature:S '& . Date: ( ontract r or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING FOR CI•I'Y i Approved by:. Time Authorized: Void After t14 / 3dr / O l Special Conditions 14AINTAW MOPE& 7RI�FF(6 eaN�c, Fes' Mur-en AppmyEy 7F-AFF#e, Giarya(- P64Af . JSE ONLY Right-of-way Fee: 7 6 Disruption Fee/Fund 11 Restoration Fee: Total Fee: '7S Receipt No: Issued by: UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGIN INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00. OF TH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Ha NO WORK SI-IALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUAN CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION (` J0s ry ,,, }}} /// SUITE/APT# ADDRESS � � /� ? � / / / w 0 OWNER NAME/NAM{E OFF BUSINESS l LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK S/UB ISION O. LID N0. MAILING ADDRESS 1`�`q��� VW—�VL� PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED TESCPApproved O RW Permit Required ❑ Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required ❑ Sidewalk Required ❑ w CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME w _ U METER SIZE T LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ < ; ADDRES.+S�--� �f Jb1� S'�" C4 . \\\ REMARKS Z 2 Z Zipa CITY V Y r TE� GNU ER� z w NAME U < ac AQDAESS ` �y �'-r_) �• �` C' NGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER ~ FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY w pZ J ¢ STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE VARIANCE OR CU ADB # SHORELINE # Legal Description of Property - include all easements SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT ZO Q wLOT COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP ALLOWED I PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) p J w J ALLOWED )PROPOSED / n S i '! _ �l �-, ; FRONT SIDE REAR � � v_ /2 � i/C,17 FRONT UR SIDE REAR r` / / fit` 17(' /�u /�i> Q Z Z Property Tax Account �1 ^1 "`1 o4 fb-1 % y�^� Parcel No. jJ G• i (,,n t,/[„J ( VlJ4,J r LOT AREA P NNIN VIEW BY .yJ f't �.� ar.lt'� 14`1 DATE Z. 4 7 g NEW ® RESIDENTIAL PLUMBIN ECH REMARKS 1:1COMMERCIAL El ADDITION CHANGE OF USE 17-71.000 REMODEL APT. BLDG. SIGN CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 17aDEMOLISH CODE % OCCUPANTS REPAIR ❑ GRADING ❑ FENCE CYDS. ( X _FT) O a WOODSTOVE D SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUB/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED Cl YES AREA 2�"jf-� � �(/ OCCUPANT LOAD REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 Z (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: Co NUMBER OF NUMBER OF DWELLING CRITICAL AREAS CA.,9-ii - O m0 STORIES UNITS NUMBER 1" -' DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE ( TTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED 1 VALUATION FEE Y�� CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SO RCE: 'j1y>L ING Cl�yli ��1%�?Gb/o PLUMBING r Plan Check No. 19 - / MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE y J successors i.n interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, a a x employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed -to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT -� omodify, x waive or ireduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any Way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance aria RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIG ATURE (OWN R OR AGE T) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF OFFICIA S GNA DATE EDMONDS CALL FOR LE. ~ s BY: D E ATTENTION INSPECTION r� �r� IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE ��� 0220 UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 6fit INAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC 11 SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10247 i' 7 j- j •�':! �r[� � � _ .caC_ v �r Y '• it f L_i jj 'k 7� i. n.�-a �'T f• - _ ��." � 4: • � Y •>'.. ' , i ... r`� y t'� / try `' `fit^ •• �a, I � • + y— �'' STREET FILE* iz aJ 0P . o ell FLETGHE�t TRACT S C a. le _ ',: i00 sas ` \ Nl �G \ �r- SpUN m cill i_ L BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORK - 6+,6 ",ot)_ M=i'_� ADDRESS OWNER AP PROVED DATE NU ER. ............. N! 1 ,.! , wi 'pact PLICANT Gupy. ALI ;OT FARX CORUCR. 7310 1tv lVelp R F� � � nlk Co rA4rl D _?o Yes a - L 1 j-�- ; -L^d i •/i• t ��EF'�jA: yyS J 'r �'1,Z...: + -y '`�< �r w /':�a. _ f � �n � � YYi..yr} Y o,_• -K ' 4' �,y :wt'�!;�`. ti. 'rt r � E ✓ -a C t , ... .. .y y � I i �•� �^$' 7 • may. : v r .• f�. . � ♦..- .. f- . `r /`•rL ° +fir ! ^ ! ! + � , -•� Y q-�' � •\ \t_ -A' !�. ell �•.•Zw _ — � � - 'r, .. I �" ' /_ ./ �'- - 4`„, 1 �... /_t, ��„ �� .. �,'.{. R',r]' - 'L �` � •�l. :G.0 �y_4,R �R. '�`� 4-. _ :•�: _ 7 •J:' I. +i '7•i -•fig:' . ��tx.i%4• : .r f _ _ - J; p'' .s+" _ L`� S 'L- ' Nr _f. `Y r+ i L �• 1st• \ 3. i,`.'• : 1, ._ �''. r r. �' fM r p .y - i'l� 1d f ' J l..•-.i J •2 ..5 �I _ f '+,`- OL _ '� • � �--- r �`,?t..> .'ram ':%` < �2 !-• T`' � - - . -.i t' � _ tel: <.r P .: r♦ r5„ �.. S =.n• l i r. ri�1 t y•, : S't „� . ,.';.. -J• �... J.J. .• . ...�_. '. {=;'.. � i •i� �/ tr +• •< J_ .�a/Ss .�-.G <' �.- F.) 7 �"'./ '' �I</ < ice.-•- •�� - �t7�,�;.,: •r * . 2.t �!• Y [.y 1r '\� 4�, t,, - •, ,i, �. ;{ " _,t. t t f4• t.0 fG 1 ` :3, rrlo ��Y a•. i r +•y 3 is �z ..I �i �`'r;,'..-'s`-:tom-=a , �.>:-•::' - .. ", fi t• - -f ._... P .%J - ...E � � '::1.... Y• i • . 7., i.. :.5. "9 'YT`3 x� 't •S. •F J• '6 st. .�sr.. .r[. 'L / 1 t •' � "LJ f 4,r - 1, j1 ti •4�. J ,� f ...r- . i -1 f... 7_ - 2 Y ;•t t 3 . s •i _ Fr: _ <i ;r y - 'i i .• Qv ,.i ,t3 i. •� � �:'_ .:.t _ r -t .� ,'�� A S 3 t .L 1 ,mom ma r{>''• LS '�... •2�' - - •ti2.:- �.A �, t :,i. r t '.�. 1,2: '.I: ^!R'\r - '4 R� t '.b:- .E �- f ' It '•� __ L .1'... k . •`f ` - rt 'a,! CSi i 4i pp � J •i• .5'' :t •3 y ' •.F �,`-<(d��,, •�{ 4 .tom,. _ -�. • t r Y y - . �_..,,... ''+I3:�e.L�'FA�Fh�.2�f''T' Y.e . .. , 1'/ �•. �_. _.. - IL�•,. 1 ,.a.r, rL . J�� i �`' - � =, t'•aV.�3lr�4i.`,v%M� �� _L`' a- '�1r �+L t'?L "�"-�c,Y„ �i.' ;'•w� �s�'Lt,g �t4 i 40-40- -Ae m 3 LAYOUT, DUCT AND ROAD SECTIONS: REFER TO SHEET 2 'SCHEMATIC: • 1I TRANSFORMER v— FUSE PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CABLE OVHD EXISTING OVERHEAD -- f —FEED THRU BUSHING ON TRANSFORMER CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. IN ANY TRENCH WITH GAS THE PUD OR PUDS CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALLI SCREENED/WASHED SAND FOR A BEDDING WITFj A MINIMIUM DEPTH O IN SAND TREN( COVER. WITH A MINIMIUM DEPTH bF 3 . FOR ALL 2. INSTALL A 4'10" x 440" A 24" CONCRETE BULKHEAD (CUO V0702) AT VAULTS A-32378 AND A-32381. 3. INSTALL (1) 3" SECONDARY RISER (CUD FO1D6) ON NEW SERVICE POLE ON LOT LINES 4/5 IN EXISTING PLAT OF MAPLE MANOR. 4. CUSTOMER REQUESTED UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDER SIDEWALK DUE TO GRADE PROBLEMS IN EASEMENT AREA CUSTOMER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPACTION IN THE SIDEWALK AREA 4-POS/5-PI SET SCREW TERMINALS SECONDARY TRIPLEX CA SMALL/LARG SECONDARY PEDESTAL 3" PVC DUC TO FEED IN OF CORNER! PEDESTAL 3" PVC W/S 24"R BEND BELL END F TRANSFORME PEDESTAL TRANSFORMERS 7200-120/240 V Er; PUD OR PUD'S CONTRACTOR A-32378 25 KVA A-32379 25 KVA UTC UTC SER SER MAKE MAKE ASSYO i2U611 ASSYO 12USIO A-32380 15 KVA A-32381 37.5 KVA UTC UTC SER SER MAKE MAKE ASSYO 12US12 ASSYO 12U612 VAULTS BY PUD OR PUD'S CONTRACTOR A-32378 THRU A-32381 42" x 442" x 330" OPEN BOTTOM W/A 2T'x 25 ACCESS HOLE SECONDARY PEDESTALS ¢ BY P(F) OR PUD'S CONTRACTOR 8 SEC PEDS/INSTALL PER DIST ASSY* =01 2 SEC PED/INSTALL PER DIST ASSY* IU802 FEED THRU PEDS ON LOT LINES V2 AND 1VPRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT TYPICAL PEDESTAL DETAIL NTS NOTE: w a 1. 12" MINIMUM GAS TO N F - POWER SEPARATION. H- N 2. NUMBER OF CONDUITS IN 5 Q -� TRENCH VARIES. VT yl 6 $ 5 4 i 3. ALL CONDUCTORS IN w 0 V) 00 CONDUIT. r LU Z O cM 12.. 2..�� y o W I II MIN In I I GAS GAS TO STAKE OR SHADED AS RETAIN TRENCH STAKE EVERY 10' TO RETAIN TRENCH SINGLE PHASE TYPICAL JOINT TRENCH DETAIL NTS STREET LIGHTS BY PUD OR PUD'S CONTRACTOR 3 ST LTS/SOURCE VOLTAGE 120V ALL ST LT CA TO BE IN 2' PVC INSTALL PER DST ASSY* IL902 { t f 'x R/W �------ ---------t---- - -- W ..-- -- ---'-------------- ----- CTELEPHONE m ----- ! -- t_— 1 PVT — ---�D -- 2 PVC CONDUIT ON GAS STUB \mil ui T�NCCHH JOINT ' ll ~CAVATE AT - - - - - - FOR o PEDPED TELE VAULT AND STUBOUTS C J 2. I 3. GAS STUB 1' 6' PC R/W -- ------ -+------------------ GAS —� TELEPHONE •---- `------�I�--------------- -----CATV n c - - - - !- - PUD w -' SEC ---------- ~w ONCGASS STUB wI ACROSS JOINT w TRENCH i CATV PED o 2. I 3' GAS STUB TYPICAL JOINT TRENCH VAULT/PED LAYOUT NTS o GAS IN PLAT CABLE ALL FOOTAGES APPROXIMATE BY PUD OR PUD S CONTRACTOR LOCATION­9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE EDMONDS 98029 AREA SO, COUNTY FROM POLE TO A-32378 POLE NO NEy.S 13 T 27 R 3 DATE 10/6/99 w0 NO 310448 OF (1) n AL CNCTRC NEUT DB JCKTD PRIM 2" PVC REASON FOR WORK PROVIDE 10 PRIMARY UNDERGROUND ENGINEER SALO TASK 04 AK MAKE ME PO REEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR THE DRAFTER KG UGND NO 1Q603-1 12 LOT PLAT OF APPROVED DW SCALE NOTED FROM A-32378 TO A-32379 _ VISTA DEL MAR, DIVISION 2 PRINTED 350' OF (1) 02 AL CNCTRC NEUT DB JCKTD PRI IN 2" PVC DATE WORK COMPLETED FOREMAN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS MAKE PO REEL SUBSTATION PERRINVILLE CIRCUIT NO PHASE Z_ FEES REQ D . YES ONO ■EXEMPT IN OT EXEMPT PARA.� ITEM_ FROM A-32379 TO A-32380 _12-93 ROAD CROSS410'INGS PRIMARY OVERHEAD OVHD CONDUCTOR KV (0 •2 AL CNCTRC NEUT D8 JCKTD PRI IN 2" PVC ONLY EI RESIDENTIAL ADO CKT FT PH MAKEOF MAKE PO REEL APPV APPV DATE DESCRIPTION O COMMERCIAL REM CKT FT pH NET CKT FT FROM A-32378 TO A-32381 REVISIONS C `—• ` UGND CONDUCTOR 7,2 KV 220' OF (1) 02 AL CNCTRC NEUT DB JCKTD PRIM 2" PVC PRIMARY UNDERGROUND ADD 1240 CKT FT I PH MAKE PO REEL APPV N0. DATE DESCRIPTION ■ RESIDENTIAL 1250' OF 4/0 AL TRX DB SEC IN 3" PVC 0 COMMERCIAL BASIC FEE a REM CKT FT PH -- NET _VIQ__CKT FT 410' OF AL DUP DB ST LT IN 2" PVC LIU• PERMITS (DATE GRANTED, 0 tom•, s O TREE TRIM SECONDARY UNDERGROUND osTATE BASIC FEE t O COUN T Y K ■ EDMONDS A-32380 UNDERGROUND PLAT BASIC FEET EASEMENTS .REEQUIRED ENGINEERING E• 32579 O NOT REQUIRED 15- A. FT a a_ _ s E• 0018-PRIVATE ROAD PLAT CONSTRUCTION REQUEST NO. 2851 —) CL G FT C S t DATE APPROVED 12/19/00 A-32379 STREET LIGHTING FOREIGN CONTACTS F.- C FT 0 a_ . t ❑ GTNW JPN. 25- (n - CROSSINGS 0 CATV JPN. 0) I t FT C a_ . a ■ JOINT TRENCH GTNW t CATV 3 WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY ❑JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV 55279 AS —BUILT O PRIMARY ■ JOINT TRE NCH W/PSE J 0 SECONDARY POLE STENCILING CI_ 55278 A-32381 APPV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FT o a .t FRO. TO -- MISCELLANEOUS FEES TAKE OFF POLE 37.5- 55277 VAULT a PRE-CONSTR REQUIREMENTS I PERMIT a ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ PUD LOCATOR Z O A-32378 COST ESTIMATE a 0BACKHOE 0 N (W/PSE SAND) s ■ DINE CALL DATE O) 25- a TOTAL DUEL INDEX POLES PLAT DATE PAID 6/6/01 LOGS U-MAP I -LINE I 55276 2 I RECEIPT- 53661 XFMR C-MAP GIs Q ENGINEER PATTI SALO NEW SVCE APPLICATION. LOCATION MAP PAGE 454.H2 FU 25 AMP PHONE_ (425)347-4412 CUSTOMER_GEORGE KAIREZ PHONE (206)778-1781 XING PRINTED PRINTEG JA -69D PEiEF AR (425)335-8690/346-8846 CELLULAR FU � ZO 65 AMP 2 J O� SCHEMATIC NTS 3' PC R/W M __ —T -- -------- Try TRENCH Try 1 e .0----- ----- RAN SFORMER/ VAULT PEDESTAL I TYPICAL pl STAKE MARKINGS PC - f•1 R/W TRENCH I- - - - - - W PEDESTAL i w 3' o I I TYPICAL STAKING LAYOUT NTS i i WORK SITE MUO TY SH PN ARK PUGET SOUND a` d i i i of .j% Ax*H T sw DOCKi ED ONDS VICINITY MAP TAGS C z - VAULT: A-32378 THRU A-32381 0 CABLE: 55276 THRU 55279 - c 0 GJ I — 91ST PL W UTILITIES ja=� EA - EASEMENT 380 P F 7 A-32380 ;�_• i /io 9 �� A-32379 P r °NA 10' DRAINAGE 1 Cir P \ o •, 6 2'SPVC EXIST ` 5 (FUTURE) 2 4 E I I 90* STEEL Cz C � y \ ELBOW — � ELBOW CONCRETE BULKHEAD 90• STEEL ` VE' 0DRi (CUR V0702) 'OAELBOWASEMENTAINAGE�-32378\S° LL-3�w-X� 'S (9203) P of r EASEMENTQ ` ` \ 10' SEWER . TYP SECONDARY \'• 'l r,. , 1 5 a / UGNO TO FEED SECONDARY OVHD SERVICES /f 3238 �- _ a kAIREZ_,DR _ (92ND. pCoW)' w L-4347- _. 4 — F -'C---- P UGND TO FEED SECONDARY OVHD TO LOT 9 .``SECONDARY CONCRETE BULKHEAD, (CUO V0702) 1 POLE REPLACEMENT AND ` \ i NEW SERVICE POLES TO BE SET ON WOO 310446/TASK 02 TRIPLfEIDARY SERVICE LAYOUT LEGEND IN PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER © SUBMERSIBLE J-BOX © SECONDARY PEDESTAL PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CABLE - - - - - - - - 4/0 SECONDARY UNDERGROUND CABLE ----�—�-STREET LIGHT CABLE 0 POLE AND OVERHEAD LINE - - PROPERTY LINE — —RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXISTING DUCT — — — — FUTURE DUCT — — — —EXISTING FUTURE DUCT ---- --5------;:)SANITARY SEWER/MANHOLE ------D---- 3STORM DRAIN/CATCH BASIN ------ w----- -0WATER MAIN/METER Y FIRE HYDRANT 1k' STREET LIGHT * UNDERGROUND LOCATOR MARKER EXISTING STREET LIGHT ON POLE DUCT 'XINGS BY CUSTOMER (A 70' OF (2) 2" AND (1) 4" PVC (() 2" AND (1) 4" FUTURE) 30 60' OF (1) 3" PVC CJ� 50' OF (1) 2" PVC 0 70' OF (1) 3" PVC OE 40' OF (O 2" PVC Q 60' OF (1) 2" PVC © 200' OF (1) 3" PVC Q 75' OF (1) 3" PVC XINGS TO BE INSPECTED BY PUD LINE PERSONNEL STREET LIGHT 1% R/W EASEMENT 32V2' 171/2' R/W EASEMENT 2' 6" 12 12' 5' TRANSFORMER/ SEC- I I I VAULT i 1 PROPOSED GUARDRAIL TRENCH L-SECONDARY 4 1 PEDESTAL KAIREZ DR .(92ND PL W) (FROM OLYMPIC VIEW DR NORTH TO 91ST PL W) TYPICAL ROAD SECTION NTS LAYOUT 50' STREET LIGHT--� R/W 30, 30' R/W EASE ENT 1•- 11' 5' �grPLAT FENCE 1, 1 OLYMPIC VIEW DR VARIES TRENCH TYPICAL ROAD SECTION NTS 12 RETAINING WALL --- _ OVHD LINE FROM HERE NORTH TO BE REMOVED ON WOO 310446/TASK 02 AFTER UGND FOR PLAT HAS BEEN INSTALLED IC 20' 6" A-23798 EXISTING o 0 2 4� R/W 10' EASEMENT � 5, L �MENT�! SIDEWALK I EASEMENTI TRANSFORMER/ II VAULT I I L-SECONOARY 3'-6' PEDESTAL 91ST PL W (PRIVATE RD) VARIES TRENCH TYPICAL ROAD SECTION NTS w0 310448 TASK 04 SCALE NOTED DFTR KG CHKR ENCR SALO APVD DW DATE 10/99 VISTA DEL MAR DIVISION 2 LAYOUT,OUCT AND ROAD SECTIONS 10603-2