2021-09-21 City Council - Full Agenda-29721.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE,
HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA
98020
SEPTEMBER 21, 2021, 7:00 PM
THIS MEETING IS HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING PLATFORM. TO JOIN, COMMENT,
VIEW, OR LISTEN TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN ITS ENTIRETY, PASTE THE
FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE
ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE
AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND.
WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE.
IN ADDITION TO ZOOM, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED
LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION
1. Snohomish Health District Update (20 min)
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of September 7, 2021
Edmonds City Council Agenda
September 21, 2021
Page 1
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 7, 2021
3. Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
4. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Robert Holt
5. July 2021 Monthly Financial Report
6. Proposed Amendments to PFD Charter
7. Audio/Visual Assistant Job Description
8. Civic Park Funding - Washington State DOC Grant
9. Civic Park Funding - 2021 Snohomish County ILA
10. Waterfront Redevelopment Project - EWorks Landscape Contract Amendment #4
11. Purchase of new Wastewater Pump for Lift Station 1
8. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public Hearing for Stormwater Management code (ECDC 18.30) update (30 min)
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund Nonprofit Organization Grant Awards (20 min)
10. NEW BUSINESS
1. Project Update for the Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project (15 min)
2. Shirley Johnson Property Donation (15 min)
11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. Council Committee Minutes (0 min)
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
September 21, 2021
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Snohomish Health District Update
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Pursuant to the interlocal agreement with the Snohomish Health District, the District is required to
provide a quarterly update report to the City Council.
Staff Recommendation
No action required. For information only.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Edmonds —Fall 2021 SHD Update
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
a
n
Working Together for a Healthy
and Thriving Edmonds.
O
O
Katie Curtis, Director
Prevention Services Division o
September 2021 N
CU
U-
y
C
O
W
C
d
E
t
SNOHOMISH M
HEALTH USTRICIT!O� a
WWW,SNOHD.ORC
Packet Pg. 4
4.1.a
m
Q.
�L
0
t
d
L
O
t
O
a
cn
R
Q
r
N
O
N
m
LL
I
y
C
O
E
W
C
E
t
v
R
a
Packet Pg. 5
0
STRATEGIC GOAL:
REDUCE THE RATE OF
COMMUNICABLE
DISEASES AND OTHER
NOTIFIABLE CONDITIONS
COUNTYWI
TRENDS FOR 202:
Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Hepatitis B & C
H IV (new cases)
Pertussis
Syphilis
Tuberculosis
m
V
CL
-L
N
G
s_
ea
m
_
s
N
E
O
s
O
co
2
m
V
CL
0
CO)
T-
N
O
N
U-
O
W
CD
a
Packet Pg. 6
COUNTYWIDE I
TRENDS FOR 2021 VS. 2020
Drug Overdoses
Youth Suicides
='1=40,%
L,l
o�
N
O
N
m
LL
N
C
O
E
STRATEGIC GO) W
ENT OR REDUCE CHRON
DISEASES AND INJURIO <
Packet Pg. 7
Drug Overdose Deaths
250
200
150
100
78
50
0
2006
Snohomish County, 2006-2021*
(*2020 & 2021 data is preliminary as of 8130121)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
—All Drugs � Heroin � Rx Opioids � Synthetic Opioids —All Opioids
Source: Washington State Department of Health
Snohomish Health District
M
as
r
•L
0
t
r
O
2
t
to
E
O
t
O
a
N
d
!Z
G
2
U)
N
O
N
ILL
I
N
C
O
E
W
C
O
E
t
v
Q
Packet Pg. 8
4.1.a
Youth Suicide in Snohomish County
Zero Suicide Discussion, November 2020
EMS Dispatch for Suicidal,
Suicidal Ideation, OD related to
an attempt, and/or Intentional
Self -harm for ages 10.17 in
Snohomish County from 2017
through October 15, 2020.
Source: Pre hospital Electronic Health Record
Database, Snohomish County. 2017• YTD 2020
Snohomish Health District
R
Packet Pg. 9
r7 ! •�� b■
WIN
Zt)- m
raw
♦" i
STRATEGIC W�
PROVIDE HIGWQUALI_
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICE
4.1.a
M
Land Use Activity in Snohomish County
0
•
1058
Building clearances for building permits
1010
N
E
O
t
148
O
New well site applications
cn
126
m
a
c
sss
New septic applications
Cn
805
N
O
N
M
LL
As-builts/final inspections �40F516
O
E
w
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
■ 2021 YTD ■ 2020 YTD E
a
Through August 2021 Q
Snohomish Health District
Packet Pg. 11
STRATEGM
IMPRO\
FAMILY
►TERNAL, CIS
TH OUTCOM
OUTREACH & EDUCATI
ACTIVITIES - 2021 Y7
612 Child Care Consultatio
1,341 STARS Courses Complete
*thru Jun�30—M
✓ Ca p`on childhood
" vaccines
MMWesilience we_ binars
4 Fit V!
✓ ABCs of Safe Slee ��:;
I
0;9'ruspop
4
STRATEGIC GOAL:
PROVIDE LEGALLY f
VITAL RECORDS
COUNTYWIDE
TRENDS FOR 2021 VS. 2020CL
N
2020 2021 YTD1 o
Birth 147170 77138
Certificates y
E
0
0
_
Deaths 287477 147590 Cn
0
Certificates
*th ru June 30, 202
N
O
Move to VitalChek "
_
✓ New kiosks coming soon E
W
Closed record state as of Jan 1, 202'
a
Packet Pg. 13
61
�! �,,16D%, y.p 9 9 19
010"M
bw
STRATEGIC GOAL:
ADDRESS ON;GO;IN..
&
PUBLIC HEA is
4.1.a
Current Trends
N
Snohomish County CaVlo-19 Case Rates per 100,011DUfor 2-week Rolling Periods
r
500
470 I 2
450 462 52 �
49 431 425 fA
400 405 E
369 990 C
0 350 355 t
0 337 0
o C
0 300 309 (n
2W 283
d
a 250 253 W411 t4
225 "a
o�c 204
09
190 80 190 193 D
U 150 — 158 152 153
129 2412E 3` 30 139 N
104 /49
6 105 5 102 105 111 114 107
89 79 N
78 5 74 p
50 9 44 & 2 57 N �
4 p pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp OO pp pp OO pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp p pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp IL
CpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV fpV COV CV fpV COV CV fpV CV CV fpV CV CV fpV CV CpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV fpV fpV CV CV CV fpV CV fppV fppV CV fppV fppV CV fppV fppV CV fppV fppV CV fppV COV CV fppV CV . .p . . .p . . .p . . .p . .p .p . .p .p . . .
CV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV CV CV [V CV CV [V CV CV fV CV CV fV CV CV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV CV CV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV fV CV CV [V CV CV fV CV CV fV CV CV fV CV CV fV CV fV fV CV fV fV CV CV CV '�
Q P Q... P Q .. �$t�m ry �� m � � ry °rv° �^ �°a ry Q�QoQQ 1 ry m ¢¢ � � ry � � ti @s P-Q P- P ... P G
m m Rl N If7 N V1 If7 l0 lO l8 l0 M1 M1 R M1 0a 04 0a 0a 04 O7 07 41 O7 .-I .xf .xf .xf .-I . . . r� rx 0 0 .xf CYT [`xi [`xi C`xf m Rl Rl Rl � � � � �/} N If7 If7 N l8 l8 l0 l8 M1 R M1 R R 0a 04 04 0a O7 O7 C
[p OV� O O pr O�I �C OpV O rp Ol O O O O O O p Op O O p O} �� Opp O O � Op O [p O1 O O [pV� p�p �/�} per} �� p O O O p O O O O O O O p Op O O O O O p Op O iy'
C O 0 0 ... 0 O O .--I 0 0 O O .--I CV .�-I [V [RV O .--I .R-I CV [mil O .-I [�V [V O .-I C�V O .�-I .--I O .--I C�V Rl O .�-I CV [RV O .�-I .--I CV O O .--I CryV CV V
mmmmm NN�nNNmw�amnnnnoaoaaooaaamrnmm 5 � �r r r r r r r mmmo oU, U,U,wwwwnnnnwww ww W
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
As of September 11, 2021 0
a
Snohomish Health District
Packet-Pg. 15
4.1.a
Cases & Vaccines by Zip Code
98299
ZIP Code
July 18 July 31, 2021
Snohomish Health District
Case Rates per 100,000
- 150-199
100-249
o 51,
9a�2 � 9aza5
W271
Percent Initiating Vaccine
0 <30
°i 40-49
�,02 982 0 50-59
60-69
90na 98251 70.79
80.89
12 aez9 sexn
Vaccinations by ZIP Code
As of July 2s, 2021
Packet-Pg. 16
4.1.a
COVID-19 Looking Ahead
FOCUSED ON PRESERVING HOSPITAL
CAPACITY
PREPARING FOR POSSIBILITY
OF BOOSTER DOSES
CONCERNED ABOUT CASES AS
TEMPERATURES DROP AND PEOPLE
MOVE INDOORS
m
Packet Pg. 17
4
--dw
0
Mn
t
a+
10
2
t
N
Z
O
C
co
G1
r
Q
0
cn
mftkl. .i\R F
Packet-Pg. 18
4.1.a
Current Budget Outlook
2021
2021
Adopted
Amended
Change
Budget
Budget
Revenue $15,982,387
$32,867,186
$16,884,799
Expenditures $15,982,387
$25,080,315
$9,097,928
$0
$7,786,871
$7,786,871
** IT IS EXPECTED THAT THIS SURPLUS WILL BE RESERVED
FOR COVID-19 ACTIVITIES EXTENDING INTO 2022 AND 2023.
Snohomish Health District
STILL IN FLUX
M
a�
0
0
M
0
_
0
0
Cn
N
O
N
M
U-
0
E
w
_
a�
E
a
Packet Pg. 19
4.1.a
Per Capita Contributions
NARCAN FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
AND FIRST RESPONDERS
SPECIAL DATA AND REPORTS
HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
PROGRAMMING AND POLICY
SUPPORT
m
Packet Pg. 20
4.1.a
Sound Foundation for Public Health
"OOOY
,Allllllllllll/SOUND
FOUNDATION
Snohomish Health District
• Foundation board in place
• Working on strategic plan &
fundraising plan
• Official non-profit corporation in WA
• Anticipate 501 c3 status in 2022
Purpose: To provide support for priorities identified in community health
assessments, community health improvement plans, and/or emerging
public health issues in Snohomish County.
Packet Pg. 21
4.1.a
.r
Q
Packet-Pg. 22
4.1.a
Share Items in Media Toolkit
LETS KNOCK OUT COVID {:151
Npw's yo u r c h a nce to nU" the big play.
rnrw�e 44P
SAFE, EFFECTIVE & FREE {!151
Safe. Effective. Free.
��s.......s•. w»w snvha. org,'cwldvaccine ,�
LETS KNOCK OUT COVID--SPANISH (:151
...antra eiawes fa u�ere��idad dt !weer fa art.. j.�ada.
1;
oil
�'J1'�111r awaMYiwal�MwufMe
SAFE, EFFECTIVE & FREE--SPANISH 1:15)
Seguro, eHcax y graSuilo
� '�G�'�tNII.LMM.Dr$.'COY7tlYiCC1M hx ��,
COVID VACCINES AND "SHEDDING"-- CDVID VACCINES AND "SHEDDING"--
ENGLISH
COVID-19 Vaccines & "Shedding"
The C0VID•11,.,tunes do net cause
prop le to "Shed" the virus after being
vacci sated.
None o1 the vaccines authorized for use
contain the actual virus that causes COVIM
COVID VACCINE DOESN'T ALTER
YOUR DNA--ENGLISH
www.snohd.org/vaxupsnoco
The COVID vaccine
does not alter your DNA.
In fact, the vacone doesn 1 interacl
with your DNA at all.
#vacIna .le co
VIRwri s COVID 19 y "Biminacidn"
Las vacunas COVID-19 no provocan qua
Iss persona "eliminen o expuleen" el
virus despues de vacunarse.
Ninguna de las vacunas autorizadas pars
su use conbene el vim real que cause
COVID
COVIDVACCINE DOESN'T ALTER
YOUR DNA--SPANISH
La vacuna GDVID
no alters su ADN.
Be- hechoIs vacuna no rtHeractlla
con su ADN en absolulo.
Packet Pg. 23
Participate in #VaxUpSnoCo/#Vacuna Video
UVI N (113MEN
OR. GEORG€ Dial
IVAN NUNEZ
Nic r 1.-=.N:. r)
KIM ShIA::'L
Mom-
FmN RA51141MEH
PA OIISMAN JOOF
QARA SALMON
4-v Aigrioyo #Mupsnaco
�4
APRIL RERG
CASSIE FRANKLIN
•L
0
RARR TOLRERT JOHN LOVICK
fC
L
20
i
�• f
O
SIMONE TARVER ROB KNOWLES
0
al IT, # i Cl)
N
��AL
NAA N
A�i
!V to
".� ...� O
E
W
2
Packet-Pg. 24
4.1.a
Thank you
contact information
For more info, please contact:
Shawn Frederick, MBA
Administrative Officer
425.339.8687
SFrederick@snohd.org
Katie Curtis
Prevention Services Director
425.339. 8711
KCurtis@snohd.org
2`.
Packet-Pg. 25
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of September 7, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
09-07-2021 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 26
7.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
September 7, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Adrienne Fraley Monillas, Councilmember
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Susan Paine, Council President
Beth Ford, City Attorney
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Angie Feser, PRCS Director
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Shannon Burley, PRCS Deputy Director
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Phil Williams, PW Director
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Mike Nelson, Mayor
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Laura Johnson, Council President Pro Tern
1. CALL TO ORDER
At 6:00 p.m., the Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Nelson. The Council
utilized the Zoom online meeting platform to conduct this meeting. It was noted that Councilmember Laura
Johnson would be absent this evening.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council then convened in Executive Session to discuss real estate acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
and pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).
ADJOURN
At 7:00 p.m., the executive session concluded and the meeting was adjourned.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 27
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 7, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
09-07-2021 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 28
7.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
September 7, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Tom Brubaker, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The
meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Distelhorst read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge
the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect
their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the
land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, with the exception of
Councilmember L. Johnson, participating remotely.
Council President Paine advised Councilmember L. Johnson was celebrating her 25t' wedding anniversary
and asked to be excused from tonight's meeting.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. PROCLAMATION ON SUICIDE PREVENTION MONTH
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 29
7.2.a
Mayor Nelson read a proclamation proclaiming the month of September 2021, as Suicide Prevention Month
in the City of Edmonds.
2. SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT 2021 SUICIDE PREVENTION REPORT
Wendy Burchill, Healthy Communities Specialist & Child Death Review Coordinator, Snohomish Health
District, explained through her work with CDR, they make recommendations for prevention of future deaths
by focusing on modifiable risk factors and population -level trends. Modifiable risk factors are those that
can be changed, unlike genetic or fixed environmental conditions. Recommendations are targeted to
specific systems (e.g., healthcare, public health, school districts, law enforcement, etc.) or policy bodies,
including both those participating in CDR and other entities that can reduce risk factors to protect children.
Ms. Burchill explained CDR allows her to collect more current data on child preventable deaths including
suicide. Suicide is preventable and yet is the loth leading cause of death in the United States and 2nd
leading cause of death for youth in Washington State. In Snohomish County, suicide is the #1 cause of
death for youth ages 10-17, and the #2 cause of death for ages 15-24 year olds. The focus on youth suicide
prevention is important because if mental health and/or childhood trauma are addressed early, it may give
young adults the tools needed to prevent adult suicide. Ms. Burchill reviewed:
• Suicide Trend by Age Group, Snohomish County, 2014-2019
Rate
Per 100,000
by Age Range
Year
1-14
15-24
25-44
45-64
65+
2014
1.5
21.6
15.6
28.0
15.6
2015
2.95
23.9
11.9
20.0
21.9
2016
0
18.5
18.5
16.9
18.7
2017
0.71
21.9
18.4
21.1
20.3
2018
1.4
27.4
15.7
20.6
18.3
2019
1 0
1 21.9
1 10.1
1 20.5
1 16.5
Source: Washington State Department of Health Center for Health Statistics, Death Certificate
Data 2014-2019. Community Health Assessment Tool (CHAT)
Youth Suicide in our Community
o Youth Suicides (0-18), Snohomish County, 2014-2020, (ending June 2020) School Years
■ Male - 26
■ Female - 14
Source: Washington State Department of Health Center for Health Statistics, Death Certificate
Data 2014-2019. Community Health Assessment Tool (CHAT)
o Over a ten-year period (2006-2016)
■ 8th graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has increased by nearly 50%
(8.8% to 13.7%)
■ loth graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also increased nearly 50%
(12.2% to 17.5%)
■ 12th graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also nearly doubled (9.1%
to 17.5%)
■ 12th graders who have seriously considered attempting suicide has nearly doubled (11.7%
to 22.7%)
Source: 2006-2016 Health Youth Survey Data, Snohomish County
Suicide
6th
Graders
8th
Graders
loch
Graders
12th
Graders
2018
Seriously considered attempting suicide
20.8%
1.0%
22.5%
26.0%
Planned how you would attempt suicide
--
14.1%
16.3%
19.5%
Attempted suicide
6.7%
8.9%
9.1 %
9.8%
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 2
Packet Pg. 30
7.2.a
2016
Seriously considered attempting suicide
15.8%
16.3%
21.8%
22.7%
Planned how you would attempt suicide
--
13.7%
17.9%
17.5%
Attempted suicide
4.8%
8.7%
10.9%
9.7%
2016 & 2018 Health youth Survey Data, Snohomish County
Depression
6th
Graders
8th
Graders
loth
Graders
12th
Graders
2018
Have been severely depressed
--
30.9%
38.2%
44.0%
Feel they are doing "just as well as other kids their
age" most or all of the time not asked in 2016
--
59.8%
51.8%
43.7%
Look forward to the future, ratings of 8-10
"completely true"
--
56.3%
56.2%
56.2%
2016
Have been severely depressed
--
26.8%
36.3%
38.8%
Look forward to the future, ratings of 8-10
"completely true"
--
70.8%
64.6%
64.9%
2016 & 2018 Health youth Survey Data, Snohomish County
Zero Suicide Discussion, November 2020
o From August 2019 to August 2020 there were no youth (age 0-17) suicides in Snohomish
County. This was the first time in nearly 20 years where there were zero youth suicides in a 12-
month period.
o EMS Dispatch for Suicidal, Suicidal Ideation, OD related to an attempt, and/or intentional Self -
Harm for ages 10-17 in Snohomish County from 2017 through October 15, 2020
■ 2017 — 301
■ 2018 — 362
■ 2019 — 319
■ 2020— 197 (ending 10/15/20)
o Potential Protective Factors
■ Sleep
■ More family time/interaction (and pets!)
■ Less juggling of commitments, not overextended
■ Less bullying
■ More flexibility in terms of schedule and an opportunity to take ownership of when and
where schoolwork is completed
■ Less academic pressure —testing, deadlines
■ Less distraction and chatter (esp for ADD/HD, anxiety students)
■ Supervision
➢ It was also noted that DCYFS intakes regarding suicide attempts were down during this
time as well.
o Potential Risk Factors (in addition to the traditional suicide risk factors)
■ Unpredictability of the future —days, weeks, months, years —increases anxiety
■ Lack of coping strategies
■ Youth who have become disengaged from school
■ When home is not a safe space —creating trauma that may lead to mental health crisis or
suicide attempt(s).
■ Increased access to firearms
o Recommendations from the Zero Suicide Discussion
■ Resources to schools after a suicide. Include survivor and bereavement resources
■ Suicide risk assessment screening for all DCYFS/CPS cases
■ Adapt school crisis plans to virtual learning
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 3
Packet Pg. 31
7.2.a
■ Monitor ER data for mental health crisis
Recommendations from the August 2021 Youth Suicide Reviews
o Require a consistent, appropriate memorial policy for schools. Use AFSP's "After a Suicide:
A Toolkit for Schools" https:Hafsp.org/after-a-suicide-a-toolkit-for-schools
o Continue to offer public education about the recommendations on reporting on suicide and how
we talk about suicide can have a negative or positive affect on suicide prevention.
o Ensure that follow-up care and/or bereavement is offered to siblings and close circles (scouts,
sports teams, etc.) of person who died by suicide.
What We Know
o Suicide is complex. There are almost always multiple causes, including mental illnesses and
childhood trauma, that may not have been recognized or treated. Death by suicide is rarely
caused by a single event, such as a recent job loss, divorce, bullying, or bad grades.
o Mental disorders and/or substance abuse have been found in 90 percent of people who have
died by suicide.
o Suicide is a response to intense, emotional pain that results in feelings of hopelessness and of
burdensomeness.
o Depression, anxiety, and suicidal crises are livable and survived by most who get help.
o The majority of people who survive suicide attempts report that they did not want to die, instead
they did not believe there was any other way to end their pain.
o Safe firearm storage saves lives. An adolescent's risk of suicide increases nearly fourfold if
they live in homes with a firearm compared to those living in homes with no firearm
Why Talk About Suicide
o Discussing suicide (in person or in the media) carefully and appropriately, can
■ Change public misperceptions
■ Correct myths
■ Reduce stigma
■ Encourage those who are vulnerable or at risk to seek help.
+PREVENT future suicides
How to Help
o Take and/or offer trainings like Mental Health First Aid, QPR or Talk Saves Lives
o Partner with area mental health providers and crisis resources to keep the conversation about
suicide in the forefront
o Utilize social media platforms to accurately relay hopeful survivor stories and resources
o Be the source for timely and accurate data about suicide in your community
o Provide crisis line information and mental health resources to clients, community members
and/or students via flyers, posters, cards, and on student IDs
Crisis Resources in Snohomish County
0 24/7 consultation with professional staff
o Urgent appointments
■ 800-584-3578
■ 425-258-4357
Suicide Resources
o American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
www.afsp.org
o National Association of School Psychologists
www.nasponline.org
o Suicide Prevention Resource Center
www.sprc.org
o The Trevor Project
www.thetrevorproject.org
o Mental Health First Aid
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 4
Packet Pg. 32
www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org
Council President Paine said she was happy to seek the focus on students and youth, commenting they are
our hope. She asked if there were ways to intervene through natural pathways through schools and other
ways and whether those programs were well supported. She also asked if they were seeing any results in
better resiliency via the alleviation of bullying and providing young people skills they can access later in
life. Ms. Burchill answered the Children's Wellness Coalition has been a tool in making that happen,
focusing on childhood trauma awareness in schools. There is also Signs of Suicide (SOS) curriculum
happening in schools; about five years ago the availability of that curriculum was hit or miss and now all
districts in Snohomish County have adopted it at some level. There has been positive feedback from a
question on the Healthy Youth Survey about whether students have taken the class and/or used the
information. With regard to younger ages, now even grade school faculty and staff are asking what to do
so there is a focus on early learning intervention, coping skills, etc. Council President Paine thanked Ms.
Burchill for the information and all the work she does for families and the community.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Ms. Burchill for all her work. She recognized the importance of
the Healthy Youth Surveys that address everything from suicide to drug addition to domestic violence.
Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Ms. Burchill for the presentation and for agreeing to support this work
again this year. He recognized Councilmember L. Johnson and former Student Rep Brook Roberts for
leading this work this year with the support of Mayor Nelson and City Staff. There will be a community
panel on September 23' at 7 p.m. and Ms. Burchill will provide the Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR)
training on September 30' at 7 p.m. He recalled that training was eye opening last year and thanked Ms.
Burchill for agreeing to it again this year. The City is using the same website, WeCare.EdmondsWa.gov,
which contains information and registration links. He thanked her for agreeing to continuing this work in
Edmonds as well as throughout Snohomish County. Ms. Burchill thanked Edmonds for being a leader in
this area.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Ms. Burchill, and pointed out suicides do not just happen in children.
Since COVID, she has been affected by four families who have had three middle-aged men and one woman
commit suicide. Suicide is an epidemic within the pandemic. She acknowledged we need to worry about
suicide in our youth but also older people who think they can drink or take drugs, but they need help. She
hoped the September 23' panel will address suicide in all ages. She concluded suicide ideation is a very
serious mental health issue and she was glad Edmonds was moving into the forefront of this issue.
Councilmember Olson commented one of the most alarming statistics in Ms. Burchill's presentation was
that only 56% of 8' graders and high school students are looking forward to the future. That's a big heads
up for the entire community and for parents. She recommended assessing why that is true and working on
it as a macro issue.
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
ADD AN OLD BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM 8.1, DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FORMAT.
Councilmember K. Johnson advised if approved, the remaining agenda items would need to be renumbered.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 5
Packet Pg. 33
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to an email on My Edmonds News that was also sent to
Councilmembers regarding changing a vote.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, advising this should be discussion regarding adding the
item to the agenda, not the merits of it. Mayor Nelson agreed.
Council President Paine requested more detail on the subject matter, commenting "Council format" was
not a precise description.
Councilmember Distelhorst said he had a similar question regarding whether the substance of this proposed
agenda item was related to the content of email provided to Council.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she could not vote for something without a thorough explanation.
Councilmember K. Johnson said without getting in to details, she wanted the Council to discuss the merits
of Zoom versus the in-person/hybrid model. It warrants discussion at this time as circumstances are
changing almost daily.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the Council discussed whether or not to meet in Zoom two weeks
ago. Without a further explanation, she would not support the motion.
Councilmember Distelhorst recalled the Council discussed this at the last meeting and vote to schedule it
on the September 28' agenda. The data from the last time the Council discussed it has only gotten worse,
not better.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, commenting it was not appropriate to discuss the merits
of the proposal.
Councilmember Distelhorst said he would not support the motion due to the Council's previous vote to
discuss it on September 28"'.
Councilmember K. Johnson said according to City Attorney Tom Brubaker, the Council can discuss
whatever it wants, whenever it wants. The fact that the Council made a decision two weeks ago to go to
Zoom and to discuss it in three weeks 3 weeks ago, does not...
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas interrupted with a point of order, commenting Councilmember K. Johnson
was describing the reason for her motion, which she has called out two Councilmembers for doing. Mayor
Nelson said he would allow Councilmember K. Johnson to continue explain why she wanted to add this to
the agenda.
Councilmember K. Johnson said the Council should have robust discussions on pertinent and hot topics.
What the Council did two weeks ago or what they plan to do in three weeks does not limit the ability to
discuss it tonight. She added that she had requested to add this to the agenda through the proper channels
and was told to add it from the dais tonight.
Council President Paine said she would not support the motion because the Council just discussed it at the
last meeting. With regard to Councilmember K. Johnson's last comment, she did not say the agenda item
would be added from the dais, rather than she could make a motion from the dais.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she would support the motion as Councilmembers should be allowed to
add agenda items from the dais if they were unable to get it on the agenda through the normal Council
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 6
Packet Pg. 34
7.2.a
President means. She would like to discuss this and saw no reason not to add it to the agenda. She recalled
having similar discussions every time Councilmembers try to add something to the agenda.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said after hearing the reasoning from Councilmembers K. Johnson and
Buckshnis, she will not support the motion because she did not understand what she would be voting on to
allow more discussion. The Council made a decision two week ago and she stands behind that Council
decision even though she was on the losing side of that vote. The Council is "dipping into some serious
waters when we continue to circumvent the process by attempting to change what's done." The Council
had five days to determine what was done and study it. She found this reminiscent of a letter to Ecology
signed by three Councilmembers when they did not like the way the Council voted. She did not support the
motion based on past and current history.
Councilmember Olson said the reason this is different is because Councilmember K. Johnson was on the
losing side of the vote so would have reason to think there would be a change in the outcome.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, stating Councilmember K. Johnson was on the
winning side of the vote.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT TIED (3-3), COUNCILMEMBERS L. JOHNSON,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND
FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, asking whether the Mayor could break the tie.
Mayor Nelson advised he was allowed to break the tie, but declined to vote on whether to add an item to
the Council agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY K. JOHNSON, TO PULL ITEM 8.1,
FINANCIAL PRESENTATION - EDMONDS WATERFRONT CENTER, AND POSTPONE IT
INDEFINITELY.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented the Council President injected herself into a request for financial
information from the nonprofit Senior Center. The Senior Center, dba the Waterfront Center, took out a
loan with the City guaranteeing it via a CD.
Council President Paine raised a point of order, asking whether this was argument. She stated everyone
needed to be treated with respect and the comments crossed that barrier. She requested Councilmember
Buckshnis start her comments over.
Councilmember Buckshnis explained the agenda item requires the Edmonds Senior Center provide their
financial statements. The City entered into an agreement with the Waterfront Center last year and spent a
long time discussing the lease agreement which allows for a City representative on the board, but does not
require financial disclosure. The City's finance director is on board. It is inappropriate for the City Council
to review these documents until such time it is remanded back to the Finance Committee or the lease is
opened to require financial presentations from the Waterfront Center or the nonprofit. She was concerned
because next year a Councilmember could ask Verdant or the Food Bank to provide their financials. While
the Senior Center does not object to providing the information, she did not think the Council should require
sensitive information be provided. For those reasons, she proposed the agenda item be postponed
indefinitely.
Council President Paine explained this was put on the agenda because the City has provided collateral in
the amount of $2 million and has a business relationship with the Senior Center/Waterfront Center. The
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 7
Packet Pg. 35
7.2.a
Council has oversight responsibility as the collateral underwriter as well as a fiduciary responsibility doing
financial oversight as the City Council for a major organization with whom the City has a business
relationship. There is no difference with them providing financials tonight and the financials they provided
1 %2 years ago; this is intended as an update. The City has provided a platform for the Edmonds Senior
Center/Waterfront Center to be successful and this an opportunity for them to display that. The City has a
business relationship with the Edmonds Senior Center and as a party to the three -party contract, it is not
unfair or "poking our nose where it doesn't belong."
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas compared this to the Edmonds Center to the Arts with whom the City also
has a loan. She did not necessarily want to know all the ins and outs of the Senior Center's budget but she
wanted to know about their ability to move forward. She requested Councilmember Buckshnis recuse
herself as a member of the Senior Center finance committee and board, finding she was too close to the
issue to perhaps see the City's fiduciary responsibility in understanding what is occurring at the Senior
Center. She did not want the center to provide highly confidential information but a general report to
understand what is occurring with the $2 million collateral the City provided. If the Senior Center does not
pay on the $2 million loan that they City provided collateral for, the City is responsible. She reiterated her
request that Councilmember Buckshnis recuse herself from this conversation.
Councilmember Buckshnis said there was no reason to recuse herself, this was a presentation, not a vote.
The difference between the PFD and the Senior Center is the PFD documents require a quarterly
presentation to the Finance Committee. Since the Council spent a lot of time on the lease agreement and
the City Attorney told the Council it could include whatever it wanted, a requirement for financials should
have been included then rather than requesting it from the Senior Center now. Requesting the financials
and putting the presentation on the agenda before the American Rescue Plan presentation looks politically
incentivized rather than having a presentation to the Finance Committee and to Council via the normal
channels.
Councilmember Olson said two different Councilmembers commented on things that are on her radar. The
three -party contract with the Senior Center does not include a requirement for them to present their
financials. The vote regarding the Senior Center making a presentation is a moot point because the materials
are in the Council packet. She suggested the City Attorney weigh in on the precedent or appropriateness of
asking for a presentation regarding finances when it was not a requirement in the contract, commenting she
did not think it was appropriate. Although it may be reasonable to want information because the Council
underwrote the loan, it was not included as a requirement in the contract.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the pushback made her more concerned about what was occurring.
In reviewing the packet, it is a great report and should not be something Councilmembers try to prevent.
Anyone with $2 million loan with the City deserves to be asked how things are going. She realized it was
not in the contract but the Senior Center was obviously willing to talk about it and so she would like to see
the presentation.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked Mr. Brubaker to comment on whether it was appropriate for the Council
to review the Senior Center/Waterfront Center's financials if it was not required by contract. Mr. Brubaker
said it was entirely appropriate, it was just a check in, a report. The Council is not limited to only what is
included in the contract and can always request information. Depending on the quality of the information,
the Council may/may not want to inquire further. The Council can request information particularly given
the $2 million loan and the ground lease.
Councilmember Olson asked whether it would be the Senior Center's prerogative not to share the financials
with the Council. Mr. Brubaker said he would need to look at the contract, but assumed they would have
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 8
Packet Pg. 36
7.2.a
some leeway with regard to what they presented. If the Council was not satisfied with what was provided,
the Council could to look into what leverage they specifically have under contract.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (1-5) COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING
YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND
OLSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO ADD AGENDA ITEM 8.3 TO DISCUSS GIVING THE PLANNING BOARD
ADDITIONAL DIRECTION REGARDING THE TASKING THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE
FROM COUNCIL ABOUT MULTIFAMILY DESIGN STANDARDS WITH THE INTENTION OF
ADDING GREEN SPACE TO THEIR TASK.
Councilmember Olson commented the Council discussed this at a previous meeting but did not give formal
direction to the Planning Board. Therefore a discussion and ultimately a vote is needed to direct the Planning
Board regarding how they should proceed. She anticipated the discussion and vote would not take very
long.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. In accordance
with RCW 42.17A.555, public comments shall not include statements which promote or oppose candidates
for public office or ballot measures, except in the course of a public hearing specifically scheduled for such
purposes.
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, said in the second largest timber export state of Washington, Edmonds
City Council has illegally possessed private property owners' trees, forcing them to purchase them again
from the City before being allowed to use their property for what it is zoned for, building single family
homes on single family zoned property. She has begged at nearly every meeting for the City Council to
rescind the illegal ordinance that authorizes the City to steal their property rights, forces them to buy the
trees back to use their property for what it is zoned for. This Council is breaking the laws of the constitution
to accomplish their own agenda. In February 2017, her 81-year old parents, her husband and she purchased
a challenging, sloped 1.2 acre property with trees and views of Puget Sound and the mountains. Before
purchasing, her husband asked Edmonds Planning Department if the property could be divided into four
lots to build their homes and was told it was no problem. After the purchase, the Planning Department told
them it would be difficult to subdivide because it was in a critical area. After working with surveyors,
engineers, lawyers and architects for two years, they could divide the property into three lots once the small
corner containing the critical area was given to a neighbor.
Ms. Ferkingstad continued, with construction demands slowing engineering, COVID and complications
with her mother's multiple myeloma, the engineers were to submit their application in November 2020 but
found a moratorium had been placed on subdivision applications. It was placed to halt subdivisions so the
City could draft a tree ordinance making it impossible for them to build without repurchasing their trees
from the City before they and their roots can be removed and the homes built, a $250,000 unconstitutional
governmental taking. Since then they have paid architects, engineers, and arborists to re -inventory each tree
and reposition the three homes that they have not yet been allowed to build. The new 50% retention to
escape the takings of their trees means their views are gone and large trees will be 10 feet from their homes.
Eighty percent of the property will have to remain as open space instead of the 30% required for Edmonds
properties or 5% in commercial developments. If they go below the 50% tree retention, they will be forced
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 9
Packet Pg. 37
7.2.a
to pay a governmental taking of over $100,000 to the City for the worth of their trees. The Council has
turned their dream to downsize and be neighbors of her parents into an expensive nightmare. Her parents
are now 86 years old, not getting stronger and the Council is breaking their hearts. The Council has lowered
the value of property with trees and taken property rights from future homeowners that the Council has
benefitted from, all living in homes in Edmonds for which trees have been removed for them to be built.
She said shame on the Council.
Cindy Sjoblom, Edmonds, gave a shout out to the people outside the Council Chambers who were anxious
to return to in -person Council meetings and asked that the Council reconsider the decisions to allow them
to come back before the end of September. She recalled two weeks ago several Councilmembers voted to
move forward with disallowing developers to ramrod through plans for 14 townhouses in the BD zone. The
implications of maintaining the integrity and only allowing what was originally planned, mixed use with
condominiums, is extremely important to constituents. She thanked Councilmember Buckshnis in
particularly for standing up strong with the people of Edmonds, the kind of representation that citizens want
and need. Some constituents reached out to her with questions and she responded by knowing what the
right decision was. She expressed appreciation to Councilmember K. Johnson who listened to citizens
asking for at least hybrid Council meetings and her attempt to return meetings to Chambers.
Ms. Sjoblom requested the Council retain single family zoning, recognizing that the 3,300 units already
allotted on Highway 99 will result in another 8,200+ people in the community, streets, and schools. The
effects of that decision must be recognized before trying to push more density into neighborhoods; doing
otherwise would be reckless. She referred to a comment on My Edmonds News regarding homeless and
addiction by M. Hutchinson regarding his own homelessness and drug use. It is important for the City to
make conditions and stipulations for people receiving services, otherwise nothing is provided to the
constituents. There must be conditions for these people to get better because when someone gets something
for nothing, nothing happens.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, commented on the City's intent to regulate the maintenance of trees on private
property. Beth Chatto coined the term, right plant, right place in the 1980s; this was a revolutionary concept
at the time that gardeners should match the plant to the conditions they found and not the reverse. The City
of Edmonds adopted a version of this concept with right tree, right place in the 2019 Urban Forest
Management Plan. This concept is a foundational guiding principle of the plan and is identified as its own
goal and section. The plan recognizes that right tree, right place is a shared value among residents. Tree
planting requires careful consideration of views, space, climate, soil, infrastructure, and property. Native
trees may not be appropriate for the urban environment and a tree once planted may no longer be the right
place over time. All these values go away with the unsupported adoption of a maintenance regulation and
retention requirement. Regulations forcing some property owners to find space for any tree, any place and
bear the ongoing cost whenever a tree is no longer the right place for the use and enjoyment of property.
Maintenance regulations also have a deleterious effect on the abatement of hazardous trees because the City
arborist, whose core function is to maintain canopy cover, often obscures the rights of property owners to
remove a hazard tree in order to trigger retention requirements that are common under maintenance
standards.
Ms. Seitz continued, maintenance regulations do not work because they disincentivize trees by subjecting
property owners to oversight fees and permits for undertaking a non-commercial activity that benefits the
community, create a negative relationship between property owners and the City and trees that will serve
to warn people off from planting trees, especial large tree species. Maintenance regulations do not recognize
the reasons property owners choose tree removal as the right action. Trees planted in haste are not
maintained and therefore do not persist in the urban environment. She requested the City seek partnerships
with treed property owners; it is only via a partnership, not penalties, that the private urban forest will thrive.
Do not throw away the right tree, right place guiding principle of the UFMP. Use a normal planning process
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 10
Packet Pg. 38
7.2.a
such as the Planning Board to undertake public engagement necessary to determine if a change in course is
supported. The City should at a minimum strive to do no harm so it should not be done in secret. The City
can absolutely harm the existing and regeneration of the private urban forest by undertaking further
emergency actions much more so than doing nothing.
Carolyn Strom, Edmonds, said she was commenting from outside City Hall where several were gathered
in person to participate in local City government. She found it disturbing that the Council was not present
with them as they were elected to be. She appreciated Councilmember K. Johnson's retraction of her vote
to go to Zoom -only meetings and her request for a new vote to return to hybrid meetings. She was also
disturbed by the closure of City Hall and the Frances Anderson Center. The Mayor stated it was for the
public's safety, but no metrics were given for any of these shutdowns nor returning to hybrid meetings or
reopening City Hall. She questioned what the decisions were based on as citizens have a right to know. She
said we are adults who do not need their hands held on their personal decisions and have been making
personal decisions for their health for decades without elected officials and do not need them to take over
now. COVID will likely always be with us in some shape or form as is the flu; we cannot continue to
shutdown society, but must learn to deal with it using common sense safeguards.
Ms. Strom continued, tonight the Council is focusing on mental health and suicide. Shutdowns from
COVID have skyrocketed depression, addiction and suicide in much of the population, not to mention the
devastating effects it has had on many businesses. Returning to a shutdown mentality will continue to do
more of the same. The general public and workers can take precautions on their own by making choices
they feel are right for them, whether those are masks, vaccines, plexiglass, staying home or other. The role
of government is not to protect health, it is to protect rights. She urged the Council to treat adults as adults
and with respect. When Council goes into hiding as it has for the last 1% years, citizens do not have the
chance to speak directly to them in person and Council does not have the opportunity to face their
constituents. Two weeks ago everyone saw the horrid behavior of a Councilmember drinking while making
decisions for the City. Unacceptable and outrageous behavior that was enabled by the Council's decision
to hide away from the public. Citizens want to know how many decisions have been made under the
influence; they have a right to know. In any other job, the person would have either been fired or referred
to treatment; only a privileged person would be treated differently. Apologies and stories were given to the
Mayor, Council and press but no apology were made to the people. She questions why that was, whether
the people were at the top of the City's organizational chart or were the Mayor and Council. The Mayor
and Council may think it is them but it is not, it is the citizens and we the people demand the resignation of
this Councilmember.
Susan Hughes, Edmonds, referred to the hate portal and the statements Mayor Nelson made at the August
31 meeting. She was shocked by his completely false statements; he went on a rampage saying citizens
banded together to call Councilmembers names and a candidate running for City Council put this together.
She was at that meeting; the Mayor was gaslighting, making false narratives to try and slander a Council
candidate. She had never been to a Council meeting before; her research found there were a couple groups
at the July 27' meeting, Concerned Citizens of Edmonds, Alliance of Citizens of Edmonds, and the Dayton
Street homeowners as well as individual citizens and a candidate running for City Council who spoke as a
concerned citizens and the candidate's campaign manager who read comments from a citizens unable to
stay for the meeting as it started so late. This is a far cry from what Mayor Nelson described in his false
statements and he should be ashamed of himself.
Ms. Hughes continued, then the Mayor accused people of drinking before the meeting; she asked if this
was another false statement or were the citizens of Edmonds in restaurants prior to the meeting. She viewed
this as hypocrisy, noting the Mayor allows Councilmembers to drink during Council meetings as was seen
on the video of the meeting two weeks ago. She wondered how many Edmonds citizens watching this
meeting were allowed to drink on the job and guessed none as they would be fired. With drinking on the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 11
Packet Pg. 39
7.2.a
job, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas has called into question every 4-3 vote from the City Council during
Zoom -only meetings. There is no excuse for drinking on the job. Edmonds business owners should be asked
if they allow their employees to drink on the job. Is it okay for Edmonds police, attorney's, judges, to drink
on the job? She questioned who in Edmonds City government was allowed to drink on the job. Citizens are
watching to see how the Mayor will handle employees drinking on the job. From his previous actions, she
was not hopeful he would do anything other than sweep it under the rug. Citizens need to hold their elected
officials accountable for their actions. There have been numerous instances of mismanagement, virtual
signaling, false statements, bullying, shaming and now drinking on the job. It is time for Edmonds citizens
to unite and stop this tyranny.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.)
7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Council President Paine pointed out Agenda Item 7.4, Settlement of a Counterclaim, was added earlier
today.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 24, 2021
2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND
WIRE PAYMENTS
3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM MICHELE
VANDERFORD
4. SETTLEMENT OF COUNTERCLAIM
8. NEW BUSINESS
FINANCIAL PRESENTATION - EDMONDS WATERFRONT CENTER
Council President Paine thanked Mr. Johnson for attending the Council meeting and for his willingness to
share with the Council.
Daniel Johnson, CEO, Edmonds Senior Center, said he was asked to provide an update on the financials.
To put that into context, he will describe what has been happening over past 18 months. He introduced
Chris Wolfe, Accounting Manager, Edmonds Senior Center, who was present to answer questions.
Mr. Johnson reviewed:
Responding to Community Needs -Seniors
o Social isolation -40% live alone; 17% not comfortable using technology, 25% feel lonely
o Depression —among adults suffering from depression, 42% are seniors (65 or older)
o Food insecurity -13% have difficulty obtaining heathy food
o Declining health or disability
o Lack of access to health services
o Report feeling lack of purpose
History
o 52 years in a building designed for boat storage
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 12
Packet Pg. 40
7.2.a
o
History of innovation —Featured at White House conference on aging
o
Replacing the building —inflection point
• Photographs
1967-2019
• Rose Cantwell set it in motion
• Vision
o
A place for people of all ages —a new model
o
Expand health & wellness offerings
o
Intergenerational programs
o
Flexible space to allow response to emerging needs
o
A new sustainable business model
• Challenging
Society's Stereotypes
o
About aging
o
Seeking help
o
Non -profits
o
Community response to community needs
• Responding
to the Pandemic
o
Pivoted from in person programs to (9,000) home delivered meals & online programs
o
Added Statewide Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA) program
o
Provided regular check -in calls
o
Initiated Senior Tech Connect
o
Hosted five Vaccine Pop -ups
• Edmonds
Waterfront Center 2021
o
Construction completed — Certificate of Occupancy January 2021
o
Current program offerings
o
Phasing in programs
• Health & Wellness Current
o
Enhance Wellness, PEARLs, Nutrition, footcare -Verdant
o
Statewide Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA)
o
Memory loss support group
o
Walking Club
o
Soft Exercise
• Health & Wellness Expanded
o
Monthly nutrition education classes -Verdant, Sound Dieticians, Seattle Pacific University
Dietetic Interns
o
Footcare-Verdant
o
Acupuncture and massage —Bastyr Clinic
o
Free legal services —Snohomish County Legal Services
o
Food insecurity —expand Senior Lunch Program and USDA voucher program —Food Bank,
o
Housing advocacy —SCLS —Housing Justice Project
o
Mammograms —Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
o
Hearing Impairment —seeking partner
o
Dental Services —Medical Teams International
o
Statewide Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA) — expand
o
Behavioral Health Counseling for Veterans — afterhours
• Challenges
& Opportunities
o
Testing Community Cafe model for Senior Lunch Program
o
Finishing Capital Campaign
o
Leveraging Capacity in EWC Health & Wellness Center
• EWC Capital Campaign
o
Campaign Goal: $16,750,000
o
Raised to date: $15,250,000
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 13
Packet Pg. 41
7.2.a
■ $650K raised for green initiative
■ $250K 2021 State appropriation
■ $314K raised in the last 60 days
o Loan$2M
■ Interest only $4K / month —10/21
■ Principal & Interest $30,000 / month
o Strategy
■ 12 months of payments in the bank
■ Continue campaign until last $ is raised
EWC Financials
o 2020
■ Ended year with $79K deficit
■ Completed construction of EWC
■ Delivered 9,000 senior meals & online classes (free)
■ Minimal program income, no rental revenue, limited fundraising
0 2021
■ 6/30/21-$14K surplus thanks to PPP Loan, Thrift Store revenue and fundraising
■ 6-figure deficit projected for lunch program
■ Pandemic has negatively impacted rental revenue
o Strategy
■ Fundraising —virtual gala, grants, year-end appeal
Councilmember Buckshnis said she recently turned 65 and for those close to that age, SHIBA is a good
resource. She inquired about the deficit projected for the lunch program and asked whether funds were
available via grants. Mr. Johnson answered they were in the process of preparing grant requests to a couple
foundations who would be likely candidates to support that program. He asked if her question was related
to COVID relief funding. Councilmember Buckshnis answered yes. Mr. Johnson said that is what they were
asking for support within the recent request to the City for the ARPA funding. Councilmember Buckshnis
was aware they were requesting ARPA funding and asked if there were other grant sources for the lunch
program. Mr. Johnson assured they will seek every opportunity.
With regard to working out some of the hiccups with the senior food program, Council President Paine
asked if he was referencing to the negative $103,000 in food services income. Mr. Johnson answered yes.
Council President Paine said she recalled a similar situation when she was on the School Board when
everyone was given free lunch and there was a $200,000 deficit. She assured it was workable to get out of.
Council President Paine asked about fundraising sources and projections. Mr. Johnson said a lot of funding
is coming from individuals. In the last few months the center received a $100,000 gift from a couple who
have been supportive of the project from the beginning but never made a gift. They had lunch at the bistro
and told him they never believed the center would pull it off. After a tour of the facility, they made a
$100,000 commitment. He highlighted two other gifts, in addition to a lot of small gifts, $35,000 and a nice
letter from a couple in their 80s who have been long time members who said it meant so much to them that
the center would call and invite them to the center for a vaccine. They mentioned the date they received
their vaccine and included a check for $35,000 and applauded the center for work.
Mr. Johnson continued, the center also received a pledge in the mail for $32,000. When he called to thank
the donor, she said she's lived in the area her whole life, has been a member for a long time, her husband
passed a few years ago and she felt very blessed. She said she had never stood on another Puget Sound
beach that felt more sacred or spiritually than the senior center site and building and she plans to continue
making annual gifts as long as she lives. He summarized those were three examples of where the money is
coming from. There are also a lot of people who have paid off their pledges and after touring the facility
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 14
Packet Pg. 42
7.2.a
and realizing the center delivered on their promise, often contribute more. He was not at all concerned about
completing the fundraising, assuring they have many lines in the fire including several grant requests.
Council President Paine wanted to ensure all the operating costs were covered as well and congratulated
the center for pulling a rabbit out of a hat. Although COVID has been horrible for the community, she was
not surprised that the citizens of Edmonds have stepped up and followed through with their commitments.
Mr. Johnson said another sign that the community embraces this effort is in January 2021 there were 1,100
members; today there are 3,000 members. Not all the members are seniors, there are also family
memberships. That is one of the best harbingers for a successful future for the organization because the
community has embraced it, feels ownership and will continue to support it.
Councilmember Distelhorst referred to the health and wellness expanded section and housing advocacy. He
asked what challenges the populations the center works with are facing and how that advocacy work is
manifesting in what they are doing in the community. Mr. Johnson answered that was through their new
partnership with Snohomish County Legal Services. The focus was having a discussion and workshop for
those who would suffer from lifting the rent moratorium. Even in this community that has a reputation of
being affluent, there are many who are not or who live alone in a home that they have lived in for many
years but do not have the nutrition they need but they have a view. He concluded a lot of people are
suffering.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she missed being part of the senior center. She congratulated Mr.
Johnson for having a plan to pay off the remaining debt. She was at the center for lunch last week and
wondered if the center was receiving federal funds for the lunch program. Mr. Johnson answered they are
not. In the old building they contracted with Homage and received federal subsidy for those meals. There
were discussions with Homage about a similar agreement in the new building with Schubert and his team
preparing the meals, but the sticking point in the end was that donated funds the center received would go
back to Homage. The center felt they would be better off taking the donations for that program and putting
them back into the program as well as have more control over the food offerings. It is part of what is being
tested and they are learning every day. Schubert Ho and his team are great partners, very entrepreneurial
and willing to shift gears and figure out how to make it work.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the center could reapply for federal funds for lunch in the future
if necessary. Mr. Johnson answered yes. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented it is not quite
seamless with regard to who is received free/reduced and who is not because everyone has tickets making
it easy to see who was paying full price and who was not. She saw approximately 15 people receiving the
reduced lunch which she said was nice to see. Mr. Johnson explained everyone who participates in the
senior lunch program must be at least 60 years old and complete a form that asks for income information,
residency, etc. but that was not a requirement. The program is intended to address food insecurity among
seniors but proof of income is not required. If someone sees themselves as food insecure, that is not
questioned. He can report on how many people are at or under the poverty level; there are 1,100 people
registered for the senior lunch program. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas congratulated him on having a
work plan to cover the loan.
Councilmember Olson recalled the Council was talking earlier about youth having something to look
forward to; the Waterfront Center, the mission, building and approach have been the light at the end of the
tunnel that everyone was looking forward to, especially seniors. She expressed her appreciation for
everyone's efforts, acknowledging Mr. Johnson's efforts have been monumental. She anticipated it was
only a matter of time before all community members have a heart, soul touching moment at the community
center. For her it was the canoe journey that was hosted there. She hoped people connected those special
moments with the center and would consider making a charitable contribution.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 15
Packet Pg. 43
7.2.a
Recognizing that membership is relatively affordable, Councilmember Olson asked whether it would be
helpful if everyone in Edmonds became a Waterfront Center member and whether that would impact the
annual budget. Mr. Johnson answered the cost for a membership is $25/year for an individual, $45 for a
couple, and $60 for a family. The membership is more than the revenue, it is about people feeling like they
own the center and it is theirs. Everyone appreciates the things they invest in and have skin in the game. He
has run other membership organizations like Boys & Girls Clubs and the idea of belonging is critical and a
big part of making social connections. Absolutely they would like everyone join the Waterfront Center
because the outgrowth would be support and donations. That is the reason he is so intrigued by the
community cafe model, it brings everyone together.
Councilmember K. Johnson expressed her appreciation for the presentation and everyone Mr. Johnson has
done. She recalled a presentation by former Executive Director Farrell Fleming in 2014 or 2016 regarding
the concept for a new senior center when it was just an idea. She thanked Mr. Johnson and everyone who
has made the beautiful center a reality. Mr. Johnson recognized the courageous board and very dedicated
staff.
Council President Paine asked if the Waterfront Center would be available as a cooling center and/or cold
weather shelter. Mr. Johnson answered it has been cooling center during the two heat waves. The board has
concerned serving as a cold weather shelter. It was thought they would not operate as a cold weather shelter
at least during the immediate period due to working out kinks with the building and the availability of other,
better suited resources, but the board is leaving that option open.
2. EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION GRANT AWARDS
Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty reviewed:
• Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF)
o The ERPF was approved by City Council on 7/20/21 as Ordinance 4229.
o There are six accounts in the ERPF, including Account D — "Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
o Nonprofit Organization Support," with an allocation of $500,000.
o Small grants up to $20,000 are approvable by the Mayor, for a cumulative total of $100,000.
o Larger grants of any amount over $20,000 are approvable by City Council, for a cumulative
total of $400,000.
• Non-profit Organization Grants
o On July 30, 2021 notice of grant availability went out via press release, City's website,
Facebook and direct email to network of organizations
o Deadline for applications 8/20/21
o Applications required:
■ Proof of nonprofit status
■ Amount requested
■ Proposed use of requested funds.
■ Statement of need — especially describing financial hardship created by COVID, etc.
■ Other sources of funds available
■ Statement of how organization enhances economic, cultural and/or quality of life aspects
in Edmonds
o Sixteen applications were received:
■ One application was ineligible since the organization is not currently located in Edmonds.
■ Seven applications were for amounts of $20,000 or less which the Mayor reviewed and
awarded the following grants:
Organization Award/Request
Cascade Symphony $19,000 / $20,000
DeMiero Jazz Festival $18,000 / $20,000
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 16
Packet Pg. 44
7.2.a
Edmonds Boys & Girls Club
$18,000 / $20,000
Sculptors Workshop
$8,000 / $10,000
Sno-King Youth Club
$15,000 / $17,500
Steel Magic Northwest
$14,000 / $15,000
West Edmonds Cooperative Preschool $8,000 / $10,000
TOTAL
$100,000
o Remaining eight applications are available
for City Council review and consideration, and are
summarized as follows:
Organization
Request
Art Start Northwest
$50,000
Cascadia Art Museum
$50,000
Edmonds Center for the Arts
$50,000
Edmonds Driftwood Players
$50,000
Edmonds Waterfront Center
$50,000
Olympic Ballet Theatre
$45,000
Phoenix Theater
$27,500
Rotary Club of Edmonds
$30,000
TOTAL
$352,500
• Council Grant Awards
o All eight applications meet eligibility criteria.
o One application, Art Start NW, appears to include up to $32,000 in capital -related items
associated more directly with the completion of the Graphite arts complex than with its own
stated nonprofit mission.
o Council has direct authority to grant up to the amounts requested by the organizations.
o Any amounts left over would roll over to allow for a future call for requests (likely in January
2022)
Recommendation
o Council discussion this evening
o Requests for follow-up information if needed
o Placement on 9/21/21 Consent or Unfinished Business Agenda for approval of grant awards
Mr. Doherty explained he was not offering a recommendation for the Council grants. Because the grants
were divided into an pool for the Administration to review and approve and a legislative/Council pool, he
felt it was important to leave the grant amount in the Council's purview.
Council President Paine referred to the staff recommendation on packet page 159, noting she did not object
to the recommendation. She inquired about the process for screening applicants and what qualities resulted
in an organization being declined. She was surprised and saddened that the Edmonds Food Bank was not
included, acknowledging that that may be because they did not apply. Mr. Doherty said the recommendation
in the packet was that the Council could approve up to the amount requested, except for Art Starts NW
whose request included expenditures for capital construction rather than the non-profit mission. His
recommendation regarding Art Starts NW was to remove the first two items in their request that total
$32,000, leaving $18,000.
Mr. Doherty explained the process for screening applicants included verifying that the organization was a
nonprofit, that they were located in Edmonds, and inquiring with Arts & Culture Manager Frances Chapin
regarding arts and culture related organizations about her knowledge of and experience with the
organizations and how they help the community. She had great things to say about pretty much every
application. Some applications may not have been composed as completely or convincingly as others but
still described how they were helping the community through art and culture, helping youth through sports
or arts, the preschool, and the Rotary who helps many individuals and organizations. From his perspective,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 17
Packet Pg. 45
7.2.a
they all meet the criteria and are deserving of some level of the amount requested. Whatever the Council
leaves on the table could be used for another round of grants, perhaps in January 2022 which would provide
an opportunity for the Food Bank or others to request funding.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) has encountered a lot
of issues during the pandemic due to their shutdown and partially laying off most of their staff. Most of
their staff have now returned and they are having some performances but not to the previous level. The
ECA brings in millions to Edmonds from visitors who purchase food, hotel stays, etc. and she was not sure
$50,000 was enough to get them even slightly up to par and cover at least some of their expenses. She asked
why the amount for the ECA was $50,000. Mr. Doherty said that was the amount they requested. He was
not offering a recommendation, other than possibly with regard to Art Starts, and the Council has the ability
to authorize up to the full amount requested. He noted it may be problematic to go over the amount requested
because other organizations may question why they did not receive more.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she thought the ECA had requested more. She summarized all the
amounts in the list were the amounts requested. Mr. Doherty said Arts Start requested $50,000, but $32,000
appears capital related so he suggested $18,000.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. Doherty for answering her questions today. She was shocked at
the low amounts and has heard on the street that people did not want to ask for more. She did not think the
period of time to request a grant was long enough and she was aware that the Art Foundation, Art Festival
and Food Bank did not get their applications in. She agreed with having another round of grants, but
suggested allowing two months to apply. She hoped to expand funding next year and get more justification
for the 42% for green infrastructure that the Council passed. She was interested in expanding funding for
the A, B, C, D and E categories, particularly funds for education.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Fraley-Monillas that some of the requests were
too low, noting the ECA lost $2.2 million and she was willing to give them a lot more. She believed
organizations' asks were very conservative. In the list that the Mayor authorized, she asked why $19,000
was approved when an organization requested $20,000 and did not understand why requests were reduced
by $1,000-2,000, assuming it was to stay within the $100,000 limit. Mr. Doherty answered there were 7
eligible organizations in the Mayor's pool of grants for $20,000 or less, there was some overage even after
the ineligible organization was removed. Mayor Nelson was interested in providing grants to all the
organizations in that pool. Some made slightly stronger cases in their applications and shaving $1,000-
2,000 from $20,000 requests was a minor reduction. All the awardees were contacted and were thrilled to
receive funds. Having been a grantor and a grantee during his career, he is aware that organizations do not
expect 100% of what they request so receiving 90% was pretty good.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed the organizations can reapply during a second round. Mr. Doherty
agreed anyone could reapply unless the Council decides to make them ineligible. There would also be an
opportunity for organizations who did not apply previously and possibly those would receive a higher
priority than repeat applicants. Councilmember Buckshnis commented these are ARPA funds which are
intended to assist the community with recovering from the recession caused by the pandemic. She expressed
her support for the amounts as requested.
Councilmember Olson wanted to ensure there were funds left for some of the obvious organizations who
did not submit applications during this opportunity for whatever reason, the most obvious to her being the
Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber has had continual COVID-related impacts and she wanted to ensure
the City was looking after them because they look after the community in so many ways. Therefore, she
did not want to grant the full $400,000 unless more money was apportioned from other funds. If grants for
the full $400,000 were approved, there would not be an opportunity for those other organizations to apply
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 18
Packet Pg. 46
7.2.a
during a future round. She referred to the guidance the Council gave regarding grants up to the Mayor's
contracting authority for a total $100,000 with grants up to $20,000, explaining she never anticipated there
would be an effort to stay within that contracting authority by reducing grant amounts. She wanted to ensure
that same thing did not happen in a future round; she preferred the requests had been forwarded to Council
so the right amounts could have been awarded.
Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Mr. Doherty for his work and problem solving to ensure requests from
eligible organizations were filled.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was okay with what Mr. Doherty and Mayor Nelson did with the
seven smaller nonprofits. If the expectation had been for the Council to divvy up the money, she did not
anticipate that would have been very successful. With regard to the Chamber, she serves on the board and
they are doing okay after the Taste and the car show. They did not submit a request and she did not plan to
recommend waiving their rent because there seems to be some momentum. She assured if Chamber
Executive Director Greg Urban needed the funds, he would have applied. She noted the Chamber is also
eligible for a PPP loan.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked if the $500,000 was just for 2021. Mr. Doherty explained the ordinance
the Council passed in July apportioned $500,000 to this purpose for the life of the ordinance; it does not
say what year. Some of the other allocations had certain per year amounts, but this just had total of
$500,000. That was why he suggested considering another round using whatever funds were left over,
approximately $50,000-$100,000 in January 2022.
Councilmember K. Johnson estimated the leftover amount at $79,500. As some have said that not all the
eligible organizations applied, she suggested not awarding the entire $400,000 in 2021 and instead give
each applicant $30,000, a total of $240,000, leaving at least $112,000 plus the $79,000, a total of about
$200,000 for 2022. She realized there was not enough money to meet everyone's needs, but was hesitant
to spend it all this year when there is so much need and instead preferred to parcel it out over two years.
Mr. Doherty commented it was not typical that organizations receive the fully amount requested.
Councilmember K. Johnson did not support having this on the Consent Agenda as it needed further
discussion.
Council President Paine said she did not have any objection to how the funds were divvied up. In her view,
it made more sense to push the money to the nonprofits this year because they may have other opportunities
next year via other funding sources and providing the funds now will really help a lot of nonprofits in the
area. All of these are performing arts except for two and the Rotary does a lot of public work. The grants
will help rebuild the seed stock for the Edmonds greater community because everyone likes to come to
Edmonds for the arts and other things. She supported the requests as presented and having approval on the
Consent Agenda to ensure the funds were distributed quickly.
With regard to the Chamber, Councilmember Olson said when she did not see them on the list, she reached
out and learned they understood they were ineligible. With regard to the Food Bank, she said nonprofits
were given guidance in the media release and during Council discussions that it was based on a nonprofit's
need to continue operations and stay on their feet. The community has supported the Food Bank well and
because of that great support, they may not have the need.
With regard to Art Starts NW, Councilmember Olson observed they were asking for typical operational
expansion as they expand from donations to schools to their planned future with more facets. She wanted
to ensure the proposed award was within the guidelines of the funding source. She had hoped to get more
information from that organization, having solicited more information through staff, but had not heard
anything. She suggested waiting to approve the amounts until that information was available. Mr. Doherty
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 19
Packet Pg. 47
7.2.a
said he had received responses from Cascadia Art Museum and Arts Start; he offered to provide it now or
send it to Councilmembers. Councilmember Olson suggested he email it to Councilmembers.
Councilmember Olson preferred to have this as an Unfinished Business item instead of on the Consent
Agenda so Councilmembers would have an opportunity to amend a grant request without removing the
item from Consent.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Council President Paine about getting funds out the door quickly.
She suggested the Council analyze all the categories next year, commenting it was obvious this was an
underfunded category. She agreed with Mr. Doherty that the use of some of the fund requested by Art Starts
were construction related. She referred to Mr. Doherty's indication that a request of $18,000 was more
appropriate, explaining she calculated $30,000. Mr. Doherty explained their request includes 5 areas, the
first is $20,000 related to finishing construction and the second is $12,000 for tools related to the workplace,
finishings and furnishings for the building. If those 2 were view as less comporting with the guidelines and
the $32,000 was deleted, it left $18,000 of their $50,000 request. The remaining items are for educational
enhancement, administration expenses and community outreach. Councilmember Buckshnis concurred
with Mr. Doherty regarding Arts Start.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis and Council President Paine
about getting the funds out the door now, and taking whatever is left over and looking at places like the
Food Bank and others that did not apply. Most of the organizations are in the arts which is what brings
people and tax dollars to Edmonds. She felt it would be a gigantic mistake to micromanaging by reducing
requests by $1,000. She would agree with having it on the agenda under Unfinished Business if she could
be assured it would be moved forward at that meeting and not put on a future Consent Agenda. She
concluded many of these organizations seriously need the money.
Councilmember Olson agreed with getting the money out quickly, but there said there is still some
information coming in. As it often takes more time to remove something from the Consent Agenda, she
preferred to have it on the agenda under Unfinished Business. She understood the urgency and will not ask
it be placed on a future Consent Agenda.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule this as Unfinished Business on the September 2l't agenda. Mr.
Doherty will send Council the additional information he received.
3. DISCUSS GIVING PLANNING BOARD ADDITIONAL DIRECTION REGARDING
TASKING ALREADY HAVE FROM CITY COUNCIL ABOUT MULTIFAMILY DESIGN
STANDARDS WITH THE INTENTION OF ADDING GREEN SPACE TO THEIR TASK
Councilmember Olson said she wanted to ask the Planning Board to include consideration of green space
along with the multifamily design standards that the Council has already tasked them with as one of the
Housing Commission recommendations. It came up during the conversation regarding Unit Lot Subdivision
and a lot of Councilmembers were interested in exploring whether more green space could be required in
multifamily complexes in the future.
Council President Paine said she had an opportunity to talk with Acting Development Services Director
Chave earlier today but he was not available at tonight's meeting. The intent would be to have both the
Planning Board and the Architectural Design Board (ADB) consider green space requirements; there are
already landscape requirements for multifamily design. She summarized the majority of Council was
interested in having the Planning Board and ADB consider this.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
INCLUDE GREEN SPACE IN THE COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PLANNING
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 20
Packet Pg. 48
BOARD AND THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD WHEN THIS BODY OF WORK COMES
TO THOSE BOARDS.
Councilmember Distelhorst asked if the intent was to have both the Planning Board and ADB study the
inclusion of green space. He pointed out green space drives up construction costs and drives down the
number of units, things the City needs to be sensitive to when considering this as increased regulations that
prevent construction of housing only further exacerbate the problem. He was in favor of studying it but not
mandating a requirement before the boards had an opportunity to consider what would and would not work.
Councilmember Olson anticipated that was what their discussions and ultimate recommendations would be
based on, a balancing act between the environment and housing costs.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Paine reminded there is an opening for a Council student representative and she
encouraged students to apply. She expressed a huge thank you to City staff across the board. COVID has
been a burden for all and she recognized during tonight's discussion about suicide prevention for youth and
people of all ages that people are affected in different ways. She thanked staff for keeping the work coming
through whether in office, at home or outside. She recognized Park and Public Works staffs do not have the
option to work from home or in a protected environment. This is a long haul and she appreciated them all.
She was reminded by a staff member that the 1918 pandemic lasted three years. Perhaps not the best news,
but this is a squirrelly virus that keeps changing. She recognized that patience is a strength and she wanted
staff to hang in there and continue doing the best they can.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented suicide is real and it impacts a lot of people. She encouraged anyone
who felt depressed to seek help, talk to a friend, etc. Depression is a chemical imbalance and if a person
reaches a certain point, they can snap.
Councilmember Olson commented tonight had been a productive meeting. She encouraged the public to
volunteer for the last marsh restoration work party of the year on September 1 I' from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.;
it is dirty, hard work and waders are encouraged. She advised town halls will be announced soon to gather
citizen input on the budget and spending priorities so the Council and the Administration is aware of the
priorities before the 2022 budget is finalized. She encouraged residents to attend the town hall that is most
convenient for them.
Councilmember K. Johnson observed Council committee meetings will be held next week and respectfully
requested that the municipal court reorganization be remanded back to the Public Safety, Planning and
Parks Committee for continued discussion as requested in July.
Councilmember Distelhorst echoed Council President Paine's comments about City staff. Ensuring City
staff are safe and healthy and not sick and quarantining ensures they are available to deliver essential
services to residents. If staff are not well, residents will not be well because they will not receive the services
they need. Tomorrow is the first day of school for the Edmonds School District. As a parent with a child in
the Edmonds School District who lost 18 months of school, he was very excited to have kids back in school
and his child was looking forward to being back in school, but it is a matter of public health and safety and
ensuring areas of potential spread are reduced. He was thankful to educators, administration, coaches, and
support staff for working to keep themselves and children healthy and safe and learning in the best possible
environment. He wished everyone a good year moving forward.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 21
Packet Pg. 49
7.2.a
Councilmember Distelhorst referred to today's message from the Health District, Snohomish County is
now at the highest rate of infection in the entire pandemic. He appreciated public comment about adults
being able to make choices for themselves, but many people in the community are not making good choices
for themselves and are still unvaccinated. People need to get vaccinated, wear masks and reduce their risk
factors as much as possible to ensure schools, businesses and essential functions can continue to operate.
He hoped people would make smart and responsible decisions that will start driving the rate down. He
thanked Mayor Nelson and Councilmembers for supporting suicide prevention efforts as it impacts
residents of all ages in the community.
To Carolyn Strom and Susan Hughes, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was not drunk two weeks
ago. She mistakenly grabbed a glass of wine from dinner and drank some of it. Unfortunately she seems to
think she is irreplaceable on the Council. She rarely takes vacations or goes any place. For example, she
had lung cancer in her first year on the Council and had most of her right lung removed followed by five
months of chemotherapy during which she missed three meetings. She would have chemotherapy on
Wednesdays so it did not interfere with Council meetings. She acknowledged she probably should not have
done that and probably should have taken time off. A lot of people respond to illness in different ways; she
was in extreme pain as she was ten years ago when she had lung cancer, but she chose to serve the citizens
of Edmonds. She suggested anyone who wanted to criticize her and her illnesses to call her, she was more
than happy to explain. Not much keeps her down when it comes to serving on the Council, anything from
cancer to a face infection that infected her sinus and her eye. The hate speech from Ms. Hughes and Ms.
Strom was inappropriate and not relevant to her and her service to the City.
110. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson relayed he would have liked to have keep City buildings open to the public, however, case
counts continue to climb, 464/100,000, which is the highest yet. Due to people's personal choices, 95% of
ICU beds are full with COVID patients and only 56% of Snohomish County residents are fully vaccinated
which is not enough to defeat a pandemic. Over 200,000 in Snohomish County are eligible but choose for
whatever reason not to get vaccinated. Because hospitals are filling up, emergency help, surgery and beds
are not available because of COVID patients, the majority of whom are unvaccinated. To keep everyone as
safe as possible, steps such as closing City Hall to the public are necessary. When numbers decline and
people are healthier, safer and more are vaccinated, he will happily reverse all the closures. He does not
like Zoom any more than anyone else and is anxious to get back in person. The virus keeps mutating
because it continues to find unvaccinated hosts. As soon as everyone is vaccinated, there will be no more
mutations and no more virus. He urged everyone to please get vaccinated so we can go back to our regular,
normal lives. There are 125,000 people in Snohomish County, children under age 12, who are not eligible
to be vaccinated but have the potential to be exposed to COVID. He urged anyone who was eligible to get
vaccinated.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:51 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 22
Packet Pg. 50
7.2.a
Public Comment for 9/7/21 Council Meeting:
From: Ken Reidy
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 6:56 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson@edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>;
Judge, Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; sharonrice@hearing-examiner.com
Subject: Public Comments for the September 7, 2021 City Council Meeting
Please ask yourself the following question as it relates to any easement area the City of
Edmonds has never used and has no plans to ever use:
Why would the owner of 100% of the underlying fee title to that property EVER be denied an
application for an Encroachment Permit?
On page 14 of 16 of former Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice's Findings, Conclusions, and Order
signed on February 19, 2010 (even though she declared the Order was mailed on February 18,
2010!), Ms. Rice stated the following:
Had the Applicant applied for an encroachment permit, it would have been denied.
Why did Ms. Rice say such a thing? Why did she speculate that an application for
an Encroachment Permit would have been denied? Why did she incorporate her speculation
into her Findings, Conclusions, and Order?
Please look again at the attached document: November 17, 2009 Ann and Jeanie Meeting
At the bottom of the notes, it clearly says:
(3) Building permit Tor alteration of shed and
to permit lean-to.
*encroachment to be issued in conjunction with bldg permit.
>clearly state encroachment permit VOID once
easement is VOID
Up above on the right-hand side of the notes, one can clearly see:
>Reidy to submit (#3) at same time
Please appreciate: Ann and Jeanie clearly knew that the Reidys could be issued
an Encroachment Permit!
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 23
Packet Pg. 51
7.2.a
So again - Why did an Edmonds Hearing Examiner speculate that an application for
an Encroachment Permit would have been denied? Reidy was the owner of 100% of the
underlying fee title to the property! Why did she incorporate her speculation into her Findings,
Conclusions, and Order?
This is yet another reason the Hearing Examiner System does not work in Edmonds. A system
that allows for Hearing Examiner speculation while staff who know better sit by quietly - must
be terminated.
Please do so before other citizens are harmed!
Please end use of the Hearing Examiner System in Edmonds at once.
Another reason the Hearing Examiner System does not work for citizens of Edmonds is because
history shows City Staff do not bring all Relevant Code Sections to the attention of the Hearing
Examiner.
Please look again at the attached document: November 17, 2009 Ann and Jeanie Meeting
The notes clearly state:
"Setbacks will be grandfathered by Planning if, at minimum, a letter from neighbor states it
was there prior to 1981."
Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice was provided evidence during my hearing that my building
had been seen as far back as 1968. What more should any citizen have to do? I followed the
procedure — paid the appeal fee, provided the law and the evidence.
Again, please end use of the Hearing Examiner System.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 24
Packet Pg. 52
7.2.a
�� �20�9—_ - 19uayi T�OItI W+
or fCItS PW15
w% ' W vt A
l S 4,edTwmm 5T
- gkAj will vj&,, ile 'wstwv � vM k s;I red. %wiuvC
in plate 7
Wt vvd a s'- wow rL sv >f hAY-r r
S one j i s- a swain
CI(S Wl(1 MMjTO,r4 Y1 Or r?1�`i11 2e
aW hr) �k
subn�; �-
V4a lc M ' S%ef MI I �T addpfred . a4 same
-gene
�e vise C i V) Is As n4ed akwe . to tiu-1 61�1- U I
(Z 61,�1djn j pevm I � - a 1- eK-z h-ov? S hfd and
VV�� LOVI pvYyw�-
S�YYIQ.ya-I-
J
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 7, 2021
Page 25
Packet Pg. 53
S
2
CD
S
U
3
O
U
0
O
Q.
a
g
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Megan Menkveld
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #248882 through #248945 dated September 9, 2021 for $334,918.55, checks
#248946 through #249111 dated September 16, 2021 for $883,654.78 and wire payment of $3,656.48.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 09-09-21
claims 09-16-21
wire 09-08-21
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 09-16-21
Packet Pg. 54
7.3.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun vi
248882
9/9/2021
076040 911 SUPPLY INC
INV-2-12742
INV-2-12742 - EDMONDS PD - BOR;
y
MENS PANTS
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
174.9£ Q
2 L/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
2 NAME TAPES
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
16.0(
1 S/S SHIRT
N
Y
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
64.9� y
1 NAME TAPE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
8.0( E
10.1 % Sales Tax
M
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
40.8(
Total:
444.7; 0
248883
9/9/2021
073947 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC
310101
DOT DRUG SCREENING
�a
o
DOT DRUG SCREENING - KOLBERi
L
a
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
55.0( Q
Total :
55.0( _.
T
N
248884
9/9/2021
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
48294
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSS
c
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS
M
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
125.0( N
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
13.0( 2
Total:
138.0(
c
248885
9/9/2021
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
656000097775
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
63.4, m
10.4% Sales Tax Q
001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.5�
656000101618 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5(
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 2
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248885 9/9/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
3.0 � E
656000103238
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
a
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6( .3
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
Y
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1' E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
o
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0�
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1, a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6z r
10.4% Sales Tax
N
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
rn
0.6z c
10.4% Sales Tax
c
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
E
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6z U
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.6"
656000103245
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
E
t
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
R
9.2� Q
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
1.5E
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 3
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248885
9/9/2021
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.4-
Tota I :
169.4E
248886
9/9/2021
078097 ARMSTEAD CONSULTING INC
13
EQUITY & SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSL
EQUITY & SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSL
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
1,875.0(
Total :
1,875.0(
248887
9/9/2021
001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO
73534
ROUGH BOX - OKOYE
ROUGH BOX - OKOYE
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
627.0(
73605
ROUGH BOX - WILLIAMSON
ROUGH BOX - WILLIAMSON
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
627.0(
Total :
1,254.0(
248888
9/9/2021
073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
21921
EOGA SERVICES THRU 8/28/21
EOGA SERVICES THRU 8/28/21
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
5,203.2E
21923
E21JA SERVICES THRU 9/1/21
E21JA SERVICES THRU 9/1/21
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
17,265.6E
Total :
22,468.9(
248889
9/9/2021
075342 BORUCHOW ITZ, ROBERT
09072021
JULY - AUGUST PUBLIC DEFENSE
JULY PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
858.3<
AUGUST PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVK
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
958.3'
Total :
1,816.6E
248890
9/9/2021
077243 BPAS
1000779880
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
001.000.39.518.61.49.00
351.0(
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 4
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248890
9/9/2021
077243 BPAS
(Continued)
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
111.000.68.542.90.49.00
135.0( E
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
a
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
22.5(
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
3
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
31.5(
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
�a
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
31.5( Y
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
45.0(
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
E
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
31.5( 'sa
PARTICIPANT FEES - AUGUST
001.000.41.521.22.23.00
216.0( o
Total:
864.0(
0
248891
9/9/2021
003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
CG101188
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
a
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
c'
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
212.3( .r
10.4% Sales Tax
T
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
22.0E c
LY307534
PM: SPRAY PARK CARBON DIOXIDI
M
SPRAY PARK CARBON DIOXIDE
c
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
80.9E E
10.4% Sales Tax
ea
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
U
8.4< };
Total:
323.75
E
248892
9/9/2021
075162 CITIES DIGITAL INC
52454
LASERFICHE ANNUAL SUPPORT &
Laserfiche Annual Support & UpdateE
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
20,248.0( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
2,105.7�
Total:
22,353.75
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248893
9/9/2021
022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
3999
POSTAGE FOR EDMONDS HALF Of
POSTAGE FOR EDMONDS HALF Of
(D
001.000.64.571.22.42.00
7,797.7, E
Total:
7,797.7, a
248894
9/9/2021
076321 CM HEATING INC
BLD2021-1167
REFUND FOR BLDG PERMIT - JOB
L
Refund for Bldg permit - job canceled
3
001.000.257.620
80.0(
Total:
80.0( N
Y
V
248895
9/9/2021
073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC
SEPT-2021
C/A CITYOFED00001
Sept-2021 Fiber Optics Internet
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
661.5� .
Total:
661.55
248896
9/9/2021
070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
8498310301175175
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S�
_0
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl
f6
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
140.2,
8498310301175191
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
Q
001.000.64.571.29.42.00
140.2, r
Total :
280.5' 0)
0
248897
9/9/2021
075384 CONOM, DEREK
2915
COE V. MATTHEW ROETHLE, NO. 1
c
COE V. MATTHEW ROETHLE, NO. 1
N
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
2,845.8' •E
Total:
2,845.8: U
248898
9/9/2021
074444 DATAQUEST LLC
15914
AUGUST BACKGROUND CHECKS
a�
AUGUST BACKGROUND CHECKS
E
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
519.9E
Total :
519.9E
a
248899
9/9/2021
064531 DINES, JEANNIE
21-4111
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
council meeting minutes 8/4 and 8/24
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
680.4(
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248899 9/9/2021 064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
248900 9/9/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
248901 9/9/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 6
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
Total :
680.4(
2323
PM: PAINT ROLLER, ROLLER COVE
E
E
PM: PAINT ROLLER, ROLLER COVE
�a
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
25.9
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.7(
2440
PM: TOWELS, LACQUER THINNER,
PM: TOWELS, LACQUER THINNER,
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
81.7.E
10.4% Sales Tax
t
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.5(
2539
PM: PRIMER, SOCKET
E
PM: PRIMER, SOCKET
f°
U
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
19.7, o
10.4% Sales Tax
'@
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.0E o
2547
PM: SOCKET SET, PRY BAR, TAPE
a
PM: SOCKET SET, PRY BAR, TAPE
Q-
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
34.0� c
Total :
502.55 a,
0
EDH936072
ORDIANCE 4231
N
E
ordiance 4231
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
23.8(
EDH936458
LEGAL DESCRIP: PUBLIC HEARIN(
Legal Descrip: Public Hearing
E
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
51.8(
EDH936459
LEGAL DESCRIP: PLN 2021-0037 P
Legal Descrip: PLN 2021-0037 Pacif
Q
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
67.2(
EDH936703
ORDINANCE 4232
ordiannce 4232
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
19.6(
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 7
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248901
9/9/2021
009350 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
(Continued)
Total :
162.4(
248902
9/9/2021
002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL
019067031
INV 019067031 - ACCT 1001074529
E
E
NIKE BOOTS - DANIELS
�a
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
170.0(
Freight
L
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
5.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
c
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
�a
18.2( N
Total:
193.2(
a�
248903
9/9/2021
076542 GRANICUS
143151
CIVIC STREAMIN & AGENDA
civic streaming and agenda
E
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
1,417.5-
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
o
147.4( '@
Total:
1,564.91 o
L
248904
9/9/2021
062383 HEPBURN SUPERIOR
IN124050
CEMETERY: URN VAULT EXPANDAI
a
CEMETERY: URN VAULT EXPANDAI
Q
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
1,393.3E r
Total :
1,393.3E
0
248905
9/9/2021
061013 HONEY BUCKET
0552257572
YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET CREE
c
YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET CREE
N
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
-71.7£ •�
0552267903
MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCK[
U
MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCK[
};
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
220.0(
0552271494
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC
E
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC
t
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
483.7E Q
0552273376
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY BI
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B(
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
-43.0,
0552273377
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 8
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248905
9/9/2021
061013 HONEY BUCKET
(Continued)
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
-43.0, E
0552273378
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
a
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
-42.2< 3
0552279632
MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY
MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
111.6E N
Total:
615.31 u
t
248906
9/9/2021
073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
3498056
WHATMORE- OFFICE CHAIR
WHATMORE- OFFICE CHAIR
E
001.000.67.518.21.35.00
E
575.0( U
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.67.518.21.35.00
59.8E '@
3498938
CALCULATOR, LABELS, STAPLES, I
0
Office supplies - calculator, labels,
a
001.000.31.514.23.35.00
200.6E Q
Office supplies - calculator, labels,
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
220.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
c
001.000.31.514.23.35.00
20.8 � M
10.4% Sales Tax
c
N
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
22.9E E
Total:
1,100.OS
248907
9/9/2021
075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS
6612
FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC
Sep-2021 Fiber Optics Internet
E
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
590.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
61.3E Q
Total:
651.3E
248908
9/9/2021
062814 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
584413
INV 584413 - CUST 27559 - EDMON
P-13 RADAR -HANDLE CORD
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
248908
9/9/2021
062814
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
Tota I :
248909
9/9/2021
075474
LEACH, JENNIFER
8/31/2021
CLAIM FOR EXPENSES
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
Tota I :
248910
9/9/2021
078500
LEFTA SYSTEMS
000490
INV 000490 EDMONDS PD - LEFTA,
LEFTA FTO SUBSCRIPTION - YR 1
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
METR ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION - YI
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
UPLOAD HISTORIC TRAINING REC
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
Tota I :
248911
9/9/2021
074848
LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC
2021-1058
REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i
REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i
126.000.64.594.76.41.00
Total
248912
9/9/2021
074263
LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO
047484 01
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
248913
9/9/2021
019582
MANOR HARDWARE
145961-00
PM: TOOL HARNESS, LANYARDS, C
PM: TOOL HARNESS, LANYARDS, C
7.3.a
Page: 9
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 10
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248913
9/9/2021
019582 MANOR HARDWARE
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
896.0(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
94.0E
Tota I :
990.0f
248914
9/9/2021
077253 MAYES TESTING ENGINEERS INC
TF59399
EOMA SERVICES THRU 8/21/2021
EOMA SERVICES THRU 8/21/2021
332.100.64.594.76.41.00
425.0(
Total :
425.0(
248915
9/9/2021
076626 MCCANN TRUCKING AND EXCAVATING
E8DC RET Release
E8DC RET RELEASE
E8DC RETAINAGE RELEASE
112.000.223.400
12,261.0E
Total :
12,261.Of
248916
9/9/2021
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
357089
PM: GASKETS, FLANGE, DRIVE SH
PM: GASKETS, FLANGE, DRIVE SH
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
80.1,
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.3z
357162
PM: GUIDE WIRE
PM: GUIDE WIRE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
15.9,
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1.6E
Total:
1060
248917
9/9/2021
075590 MOBILE GUARD
INVO0671745
VERIZON-MG CLOUD MT ANNUAL;
Verizon - MG Cloud MT Annual Servi(
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
50.7
Total :
50.7j
248918
9/9/2021
070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
10373646
AUGUST GOCOMMUTER FEES
AUGUST GOCOMMUTER FEES
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
25.0(
10373647
AUGUST FSA FEES
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
248918 9/9/2021 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS (Continued)
248919 9/9/2021 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 5031
248920 9/9/2021 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 72460499
248921 9/9/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER August, 2021
7.3.a
Page: 11
PO # Description/Account Amoun
AUGUST FSA FEES (47 PARTICIPAI' a0i
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
195.0E E
Total:
220.0E a
PM: CEDAR PLAY CHIPS
PM: CEDAR PLAY CHIPS
3
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
995.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
N
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
103.4E U
Total :
1,098.4E t
DOT RECERTIFICATION
E
DOT RECERTIFICATION
f6
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
103.0( o
Total:
103.0(
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI`
o
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
a
001.000.237.120
265.8, Q
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
N
001.000.237.130
5,065.8,
Building Code Fee Account
C
001.000.237.150
o�
697.0( c
State Patrol Death Investigation
E
001.000.237.330
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
1,390.2'
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
E
001.000.237.250
532.6(
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
245.5� Q
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
67.7,
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
67.7E
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
248921
9/9/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
(Continued)
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
DNA Database Acct
001.000.237.400
Total:
248922
9/9/2021 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
0000130
PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1
PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
0001520
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
0001530
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ;
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
0002930
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
0021400
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
0026390
PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF
PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total
248923 9/9/2021 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC
051024 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
7.3.a
Page: 12
Amoun
m
195.0- E
�a
a
232.3z
L
3
36.6E
8,837.51
N
Y
a�
t
21.0E
60.6< p
�a
0
88.4z a
a
Q
23.11 N
0
M
325.8- N
E
2
23.1 1 U
542.2F
E
t
V
�a
1,348.9( Q
140.2�
1,489.1 S
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248924 9/9/2021 078501 ORLANDI, DANTE
248925 9/9/2021 027450 PAWS
248926 9/9/2021 075565 PVP COMMUNICATIONS
248927 9/9/2021 069477 ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
09072021
JULY 2021
129734
45701
248928 9/9/2021 073574 SERVICE PLUMBING & HEATING BLD2021-1200
248929 9/9/2021 078497 SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 6781
PO # Description/Account
TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSE FOR BAGGAGE FEES
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
Total
JULY 2021 - EDMONDS PD
6 ANIMALS @$207 -4 $35RCLM FEE
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
Total
INV 129734 - EDMONDS PD
2 SHOEI BLACK/WHITE HELMETS
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
2 HELMET COMM. KITS
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
HELMET KIT INSTALLATION
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
Total
FALL CRAZE PRINTING: EDMONDS
FALL CRAZE PRINTING: EDMONDS
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
Total
REFUND - BLDG PERMIT - PERMIT
Refund - BLDG PERMIT - permit not
001.000.257.620
Total
JOB RETRAINING GRANT 2021-202
JOB RETRAINING GRANT 2021-202
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
7.3.a
Page: 13
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
248929 9/9/2021 078497 078497 SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued)
248930 9/9/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200124873
200274959
200422418
200748606
200943348
201192226
201453057
201557303
201563434
201610276
201703758
201762101
7.3.a
Page: 14
PO # Description/Account Amoun
Total :
91,666.0(
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
m
E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
�a
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
37.2E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
=
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
3
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.4E c
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
N
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
Y
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
761.8E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
E
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.4E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
o
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
'@
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
32.2� o
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
a
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
Q-
Q
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
N
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
c�
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
0
91.3, 9
CEMETERY BUILDING
CEMETERY BUILDING
E
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
42.4z .M
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
33.0E E
OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i
OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i
tea,
130.000.64.536.50.47.00 8.3( Q
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.0(
415 5TH AVE S
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248930 9/9/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
248931
248932
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
202077194
202289096
202579520
204292213
204467435
220547582
220792758
9/9/2021 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER August 2021
PO # Description/Account
415 5TH AVE S
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
WWTP: 8/1-8/31/21 ENERGY MGMT
8/1-8/31/21 ENERGYMANAGEME�
423.000.76.535.80.47.61
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
Total
Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.237.140
Total
9/9/2021 075675 SORENSON FORENSICS LLC 49140 INV 49140 - EDMONDS PD
STIR ANALYSIS -14 HRS@ $280EA
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
Total
7.3.a
Page: 15
Amoun
29.6, E,
�a
a
a�
390.4E .3
c
�a
56.2( Y
a�
t
9.7m,
v
102.1( o
�a
0
21.8( a
Q
T
41.5E N
rn
0
M
0
72.1 , N
1,820.7° ,E
3,920.0(
3,920.0(
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 16
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248933
9/9/2021
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103583
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
(D
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
626.0( E,
103585
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
a
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
669.5, .3
103586
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
605.1 £ Y
103588
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
459.8£ E
Total:
2,360.61
248934
9/9/2021
078410 SRV CONSTRUCTION INC
141427 - Refund
WATER MAIN PROJ - HYDRANT ME
o
Water Main Project - Hydrant Meter
421.000.245.110
950.0( p
Total:
950.0( a
a
248935
9/9/2021
077170 STRANGE, RHESHAUN
STRANGE EXP CL 8/21
STRANGE EXPENSE CLAIM - SPOI
Q
PER DIEM SPOKANE 8/15-8/19/21
N
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
172.5( c�
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLE
C
o�
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
42.6,
Total :
215.1: E
2
248936
9/9/2021
078499 SVENKERUD, SHAWNA
2005929.009
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: (
U
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
127.0(
E
Total:
127.0(
�a
248937
9/9/2021
066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES
10005
CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITALADVE
CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE
Q
001.000.61.558.70.41.40
3,200.0(
Total:
3,200.0(
248938
9/9/2021
075496 VALERIE INC
090121
UPTOWN MARKET MANAGER SER'
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248938 9/9/2021 075496 VALERIE INC
248939
248940
248941
248942
248943
9/9/2021 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
9/9/2021 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
INV 214968
122000821
9/9/2021 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0057359-2588-4
9/9/2021 075283 WAVE
9/9/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
0057474-2588-1
3201-1027481-01
3201-1027483-01
12406469
7.3.a
Page: 17
PO # Description/Account Amoun
UPTOWN MARKET MANAGER SER' (D
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
3,000.0( E
Total:
3,000.0( a
INV 214968 - CS 21-21075 - EDMON
TOW GRAY BMW - CS 21-21075
3
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
184.0(
10.5% Sales Tax
y
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.3, U
Total :
203.3 t
INV 122000821 - EDMONDS PD
E
CPL BACKGROUND CHECKS AUG,
f6
001.000.237.100
212.0( o
Total:
212.0(
WWTP: 8/1-8/5/21 WASTE PICKUP,'
o
8/1-8/5/21 WASTE PICKUPS
a
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
31,265.2E Q
WWTP: 8/16, 8/17, 8/20, 8/21, 8/23, i
N
8/16, 8/17, 8/20, 8/21, 8/23, 8/29,
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
76,451.3E c
Total :
107,716.61 0
N
IRU OP & MAIN FEE - IRU MAINTEN
E
IRU Op & Main Fee - IRU Maintenanc
2
512.000.31.518.87.48.00
304.7(
FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF
High Speed Internet service 09/01/21
E
t
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
816.0(
Total : 1,120.7( Q
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 622.0(
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 71
vchlist
09/08/2021 2:49:24PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.a
Page: 18
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248943
9/9/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
64.6� E
12406470
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
a
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
6.0( .3
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
0.6,
Total :
693.31 Y
248944
9/9/2021 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
8101
#10 WINDOW ENVELOPES FOR Flf
#10 Window envelopes for Finance -
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
368.0( •�
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
38.2; o
Total:
406.21,
248945
9/9/2021 071467 WEST COAST PET MEMORIAL
WA70014-1-0048
WA70014-1-0048 - EDMONDS PD
o
a
DISPOSAL OF 4 ANIMAL REMAINS
Q-
Q
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
53.2(
Total:
53.2( N
64
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
334,918.5: 9
0
64
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
334,918.5!
E
2
U
c
a�
E
t
�a
a
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 72
7.3.b
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248946 9/16/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun vi
INV-2-12740
INV-2-12740 - EDMONDS PD -
SAN(
(D
BAYLY UNIFORM HAT
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
114.9E a
UNIFORM HAT COVER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
12.0-
INV-2-12741
INV-2-12741 - EDMONDS PD -
DUNI
N
BLAUER SOFTSHELL FLEECE
U
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
119.9�
NAME TAPE
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
8.0( 'sa
CLIP ON TIE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
9.9� O
DBL MAG POUCH
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
33.9� o
10.1 % Sales Tax
a
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
17.3 � Q
INV-2-12743
INV-2-12743 - EDMONDS PD -
MCIN
r
BALLISTIC VEST
N
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0(
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
c
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0(
TRAUMA PLATE
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
26.0( U
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
c
108.9E
INV-2-12744
INV-2-12744 - EDMONDS PD -
GREI
E
BALLISTIC VEST
�a
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0( Q
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0(
TRAUMA PLATE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
26.0(
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 2
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
248946 9/16/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued)
EXTERNAL CARRIER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 225.0(
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 131.7,
Total :
248947
9/16/2021
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-90376
MANDINKA INT - 1 A0542402
MANDINKA INT - 1 A0542402
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-90595
CHUUKESE INT - ANDON/MICKY
CHUUKESE INT - ANDON/MICKY
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-90967
CHUUKESE INT- 1A0262349
CHUUKESE INT- 1A0262349
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total
248948
9/16/2021
069798 A.M. LEONARD INC
CI21234622
PM: BAMBOO STAKES
PM: BAMBOO STAKES
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
Total
248949
9/16/2021
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
49040
WWTP: 9/8/21 PEST CONTROL SEF
Pest Control Service
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
248950
9/16/2021
000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC
79878
FIRE STATION 20 - UPDATE FIRE Al.
FIRE STATION 20 - UPDATE FIRE Al
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
79879
YOST POOL - REPLACE FIRE ALAR
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 74
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 3
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248950
9/16/2021
000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC
(Continued)
YOST POOL - REPLACE FIRE ALAR
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
2,187.5( E
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
227.5(
Total:
L
4,755.4E .3
248951
9/16/2021
061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX
821628
WATER/ SEWER - ORANGE & YELL
c
WATER/ SEWER - ORANGE & YELL
y
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
194.7E
WATER/ SEWER - ORANGE & YELL
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
194.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
20.2E
10.4% Sales Tax
o
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
20.2E �a
Total:
430.W o
L
Q
248952
9/16/2021
064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
141579399
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
Q-
Q
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
129.0E N
141579400
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
CD
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
84.8E N
Total:
213.9' E
2
248953
9/16/2021
077973 AINSWORTH, SHERRY
2006032.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
U
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0( E
2006038.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
t
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0( Q
Total :
140.0(
248954
9/16/2021
000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
10869
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 75
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
248954
9/16/2021
000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
Tota I :
248955
9/16/2021
078524 ALESSI, ABBEY
2006030.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
Total
248956
9/16/2021
074488 ALPHA COURIER INC
22416
WWTP: 8/2, 8/9, 8/23 & 8/30/21 COI
8/2, 8/9, 8/23 & 8/30/21 COURIER
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Tota I :
248957
9/16/2021
063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC
TM-204063
WATER - SUPPLIES/ BLUE HYDRAI`
WATER - SUPPLIES/ BLUE HYDRAE`
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total
248958
9/16/2021
001528 AM TEST INC
123151
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A0011363-11
SAMPLES #21-A0011363-11367
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
123152
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A0011495-11
SAMPLES #21-A0011495-11496
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
123153
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A0011820-11
SAMPLES #21-A0011820-11824
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
123154
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A0010970-1 C
SAMPLEs #21-A0010970-10974
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Tota I :
7.3.b
Page: 4
Amoun
259,588.5(
259,588.5( E
R
a
d
L
25.0(
25.0(
�a
U
0
t
305.3(
305.3( •E
�a
U
4-
0
480.0( >
0
L
57.4E a
Q
72.5, r
609.9F CD
o�
0
N
355.0(
ea
U
80.0( a0i
E
t
R
355.0( Q
355.0(
1,145.0(
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 76
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
248959 9/16/2021 001429 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC APWA.2021.Richardson
MRTRIOCI
248961
248962
9/16/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 65600000101615
65600000105072
656000101617
656000105099
9/16/2021 076820 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATOR CONSLT 7537
9/16/2021 078531 ATARAXIS INC
604763065-001-0001
7.3.b
Page: 5
Description/Account Amoun
APWA.2021.RICHARDSON MEMBEI
APWA.2021.RICHARDSON MEMBEI
(D
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
240.0( E
Total:
240.0( a
WWTP:9/1/21 UNIFORMS,TOWELS
Mats/Towels $47.88 + $4.99 tax = $5
3
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
52.8 ,
3 lab coats @ $17.each = $0.51 +
y
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
0.8£ U
WWTP:9/8/21 UNIFORMS,TOWELS
Mats/Towels $47.88 + $4.99 tax = $5
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
52.8, •�
3 lab coats @ $17.each = $0.51+ $0.1
U
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
0.5E p
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
'@
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
0
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
63.6£ o-
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
6.6� "
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
6
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
29.5E o�
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
3.0, E
Total :
210.1: @
U
CITY HALL - ELEVATOR PROJECT
CITY HALL - ELEVATOR PROJECT
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
3,300.0(
Total:
3,300.0(
a
BL REFUND FOR SGQ DESIGN
bl refend for sgw desgin
001.000.257.620 100.0(
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 77
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 6
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248962 9/16/2021 078531 078531 ATARAXIS INC (Continued)
Total :
100.0(
248963 9/16/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 121701
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
E
E
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
16.3E
10.25% Sales Tax
=
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
16.3E
10.25% Sales Tax
c
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
�a
16.8 , y
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2285
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
159.8E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2285
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
159.8E •�
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2285
U
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
164.7E o
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2285
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
460.0� p
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2285
a
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
460.0E Q
121739
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1771
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
123.9(
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1771
0�
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
123.9( N
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1771
E
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
127.6E
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
355.2-
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
E
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
355.2-
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
12.7( Q
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
12.7(
10.25% Sales Tax
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 78
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 7
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248963 9/16/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
13.0E
121786
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2434
a
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
170.2E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2434
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
170.2E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2434
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
175.4,' N
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2434
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
487.9z
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2434
E
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
17.4E o
10.25% Sales Tax
7a
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
17.4E o
10.25% Sales Tax
a
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
17.9� Q
121805
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
r
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1747
N
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
122.2, �
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1747
c
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
122.2, N
UB Outsourcing area Printing 1747
E
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
125.9, 2
UB Outsourcing area Postage 1747
};
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
349.1(
UB Outsourcing area Postage 1747
E
t
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
349.1(
10.25% Sales Tax
Q
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
12.5<
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
12.5'
10.25% Sales Tax
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 79
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 8
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248963
9/16/2021
070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
12.9( ED
121826
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 443
Q
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
30.9�
UB Outsourcing area Printing 443
3
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
30.9E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 443
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
31.9z
UB Outsourcing area Postage 443
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
112.9 1
UB Outsourcing area Postage 443
E
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
3.1E o
10.25% Sales Tax
�a
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
3.1 E o
10.25% Sales Tax
a
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
3.2, Q
Total :
5,559.31, r
N
248964
9/16/2021
078509 BATTEN -KING, TIM
2006002.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
CD
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
o�
001.000.239.200
35.0( N
Total:
35.0( E
248965
9/16/2021
072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT
06272021
DESIGN SERVICES FOR MARKET,
U
Design Services for: -
c
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
872.5( E
09122021
DESIGN WORK FOR HOLIDAY MAR
DESIGN WORK FOR HOLIDAY MAR
;a
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
65.0( Q
Total:
937.5(
248966
9/16/2021
078515 BEREZOVSKY, LEO
2006014.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOI'
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 80
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 9
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248966
9/16/2021
078515 BEREZOVSKY, LEO
(Continued)
001.000.239.200
35.0(
2006015.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Tota I :
105.0(
248967
9/16/2021
078517 BERRY, DANIELLE
2006019.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Tota I :
70.0(
248968
9/16/2021
069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
0014515
WWTP: PROF SERVICES 7/24-8/30i
PROF SERVICES 7/24-8/30/21
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
1,356.0(
Total :
1,356.0(
248969
9/16/2021
028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC
792015
UNIT 2 - PARTS/ HANDLE
UNIT 2 - PARTS/ HANDLE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
28.8(
10.25% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
2.9E
Total :
31.7E
248970
9/16/2021
078510 BLEVINS, TIM
2006003.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
35.0(
Tota I :
35.0(
248971
9/16/2021
074307 BLUE STAR GAS
1268543
E172SO - AUTOGAS CONVERSION
E172SO - AUTOGAS CONVERSION
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
6,800.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
707.2(
Total:
7,507.2(
248972
9/16/2021
078496 BOHN, JERROD EDWARD
1
EDMONDS PD - ENGLISH TUTORIN
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 81
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248972 9/16/2021 078496 BOHN, JERROD EDWARD
248973
248974
248975
9/16/2021 078518 BRANLEY, DAN
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
g111101 Ailr>r]
9/16/2021 064587 BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETE PUMPIN( CN004776
IN108466
IN108526
9/16/2021 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 343765
7.3.b
Page: 10
PO # Description/Account Amoun
2 HOURS TUTORING 8/30/21
(D
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
200.0( E
2.5 HOURS TUTORING 9/1/21
a
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
250.0(
2.5 HOURS TUTORING 9/6/21
3
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
250.0(
Total:
700.0(
N
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
U
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
70.0(
WWTP: 8/31/21 CREDIT FOR INV. IP
8/31/21 CREDIT FOR INV. IN10846E
o
'@
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
-245.9, o
Freight
a
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
-53.1( Q
WWTP: CREDIT #CN004776 FOR TI
CREDIT #CN004776 FOR THIS INV.
N
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
245.9,
Freight
o6
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
53.1( N
WWTP: PO 617 ADAPTORS
E
PO 617 ADAPTORS
ca
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
245.9,
Freight
c
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
53.1( E
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
31.1( +°
Total :
330.1, Q
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
1,239.6z
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 82
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 11
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
248975
9/16/2021
003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
(Continued)
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
m
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
11239.6, E
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
a
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1,239.6z
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
3
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1,239.6<
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
128.9, Y
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
128.9,
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
128.9� 'sa
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
128.9' O
Total:
5,474.2z
0
248976
9/16/2021
076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
5784584
ROADWAY - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BI
a
ROADWAY - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BI
c'
Q
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
131.8, .r
10.1 % Sales Tax
T
N
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
13.3' T
Total :
145.1; c
248977
9/16/2021
018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY
95167996
STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA
E
E
STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA
2
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
279.3( U
10.1 % Sales Tax
c
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
a�
28.2( E
95173392
STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA & EXP JOI
STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA & EXP JOI
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
387.1 ' Q
10.1 % Sales Tax
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
39.1(
Tota I :
733.7;
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 83
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
248978
9/16/2021
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
27332523
ENG COPIER AUGUST 2021
ENG COPIER AUGUST 2021
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
Tota I :
248979
9/16/2021
003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
RN08210990
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
Tota I :
248980
9/16/2021
078511 CHOW, ROSS
2006004.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
2006022.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
2006039.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
Tota I :
248981
9/16/2021
063902 CITY OF EVERETT
121004355
WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS
WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
Tota I :
248982
9/16/2021
035160 CITY OF SEATTLE
9056920000
WWTP: 7/12-9/9/21 FLOWMETER 8'
7/12-9/9/21 FLOW METER #87902E
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
Total
248983
9/16/2021
064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO
70769
CODE AND WEB UPDATES
7.3.b
Page: 12
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 84
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
248983 9/16/2021 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO
248984 9/16/2021 077984 COFFEY, TIM
248985 9/16/2021 078378 CONSERVATION TECHNIX INC
248986 9/16/2021 075967 CRONIN, TERESA SUAREZ
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 13
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
CODE PUBLISHING
(D
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
787.5( E
WEB UPDATE
a
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
96.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
3
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
81.9(
70770
CODE PUBLISHING
�a
CODE PUBLISHING
Y
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
225.0(
WEB UPDATES
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
39.0( E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
_M
23.4(
Total:
1,253.5E O
2006005.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
�a
0
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
a
001.000.239.200
35.0( Q
Total :
35.0( _.
T
N
992
PROS PLAN PROFESSIONAL SERV
CD
PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPA
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
11,119.& N
Total:
11,119X E
2
57276
INT SPANISH - 1 A01 86310
U
INT SPANISH - 1 A01 86310
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( E
62263 INT SPANISH 1A0436608
t
INT SPANISH 1A0436608
001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( Q
63938 SPANISH INT 9Z1166164
SPANISH INT 9Z1166164
001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0(
64546 INT SPANISH 9Z1166164
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 85
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 14
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248986
9/16/2021
075967 CRONIN, TERESA SUAREZ
(Continued)
INT SPANISH 9Z1166164
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0(
Tota I :
400.0(
248987
9/16/2021
073823
DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC
494513
E21 DA SERVICES THRU 8/28/21
E21 DA SERVICES THRU 8/28/21
126.000.68.595.61.41.00
4,563.7�
E21 DA SERVICES THRU 8/28/21
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
2,680.3,
Total :
7,244.11
248988
9/16/2021
077977
DAVIS, NORA
2006010.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
35.0(
Total :
35.0(
248989
9/16/2021
006626
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
LAU-WA-W657-21
W WTP: 7/16/21-7/15/22 LAB ACCRI
7/16/21-7/15/22 LAB ACCREDIT REI
423.000.76.535.80.41.50
520.0(
Tota I :
520.0(
248990
9/16/2021
047450
DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES
2021080031
CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098
Scan Services for August 2021
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
285.0(
Tota I :
285.0(
248991
9/16/2021
069030
DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORP
9918-49918
WWTP: PO 658 L2 CALIBRATION
PO 658 L2 CALIBRATION
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
270.0(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
17.6�
Total :
287.65
248992
9/16/2021
078419
DIAMOND PARKING
WF015 08.2021
306 MAIN STREET PARKING RENT/
306 MAIN STREET PARKING RENT/
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
3.330.0(
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 86
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 15
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
248992
9/16/2021
078419
DIAMOND PARKING
(Continued)
WF015 09.2021
306 MAIN STREET PARKING RENT/
(D
306 MAIN STREET PARKING RENT/
E
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
740.0( a
Total:
4,070.0(
L
248993
9/16/2021
064531
DINES, JEANNIE
21-4113
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 9/7
3
COUNCIL MINUTES 9/7
c
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
�a
367.2( y
Total:
367.2(
a�
248994
9/16/2021
068292
EDGE ANALYTICAL
21-30476
WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE
WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE
E
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
1,156.0( E
Total:
1,156.0( o
248995
9/16/2021
007675
EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
100010119512
WWTP: PO 521 NON -CHLORINATE[
>
PO 521 NON -CHLORINATED
o
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
CL
69.1 ,
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
7.1 r
Total :
76.31 CD
248996
9/16/2021
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
2543
WWTP: PO 481 EASY MIX & BROOP
c
PO 481 EASY MIX & BROOM
N
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
57.9E •E
10.4% Sales Tax
2
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.0<
2551
WWTP: PO 481 DUCT TAPE
PO 481 DUCT TAPE $17.98 - $5 = $
E
t
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
12.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
1.3.
2561
WWTP: PO 481 FIXED SINGLE PUL
PO 481 FIXED SINGLE PULLEYE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
34.3E
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 87
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
248996 9/16/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2570 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
248997
248998
9/16/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR199949
AR199989
AR200593
AR200594
9/16/2021 069117 EMERALD SERVICES INC 86853764
Total
COPIERS 9/2021
COPIERS 09/2021
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
INV AR199989 - ACCT MK5031 - EDI
8/21 A12434&12435 BW COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
8/21 A12434&12435 CLR COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
ENG PRINTER AUGUST 2021
ENG PRINTER AUGUST 2021
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
DSD - CANON DX C57501 COPIES
DSD - Canon DX C5750i copies
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
Total
WWTP: METALS REC OIL RECOVEI
METALS REC OIL RECOVERY SERN
7.3.b
Page: 16
Amoun
m
3.5-, E
�a
a
a�
56.9E 3
5.9,
179.1: Y
a�
t
177.6E •�
18.4E p
Ta
0
39.9E a
a
Q
151.2E "
T
N
19.8E
rn
0
N
96.2, E
10.0"
c
a�
E
126.0z
�a
.r
13.1- Q
652.6,
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 88
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
248998 9/16/2021 069117 EMERALD SERVICES INC (Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total :
248999 9/16/2021 069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC 260160 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Freight
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Total :
249000 9/16/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH937307
LEGAL DESCRP: CITYAPPL. PLN21
Legal Descrp: City Appl. PLN2021-0(
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
EDH937506
LEGAL DESCRIP: CITY APPS PLN2
Legal Descrip: CityApps PLN2021-0
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
Total
249001 9/16/2021 077989 FALLER, LESLIE 2006016.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
2006020.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
2006040.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
Total
249002 9/16/2021 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1001530
WATER - INVENTORY & SUPPLIES
WATER - INVENTORY
7.3.b
Page: 17
Amoun
907.2( y
E
94.3E a
1,001.5°
L
3
c
�a
8,961.0z y
Y
749.8-
1,009.9< •E
10,720.71
0
�a
0
63.0( a
a
Q
61.6( N
124.6( CD
o�
0
N
70.0(
c
70.0(
t
�a
70.0( Q
210.0(
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 89
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 18
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249002
9/16/2021
009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
462.0E
WATER - SUPPLIES
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1,008.3E a
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
48.0E .3
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
104.8,
Total :
1,623.X Y
249003
9/16/2021
071998 FOSTER, KELSEY
BID-8460
BID/ED! ARTICLES AUGUST (2) & S
BID/ED! ARTICLES AUGUST (2) & S
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
900.0( •�
Total:
900.0(
o
249004
9/16/2021
075536 FREGONESE ASSOCIATES
495-001
PROF SERV: CONSULTANT FOR PI
Prof Serv: Consultant for Public
�a
o
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
2,600.0( a
Total :
2,600.0( Q
249005
9/16/2021
077943 GAETA, JOE
2005954.009
REFUND: SCHEDULING CONFLICT
r
REFUND: SCHEDULING CONFLICT
CD
001.000.239.200
695.0(
Total :
695.0( o
N
249006
9/16/2021
078530 GAMET, VANESSA
604785444-01-0001
BL REFUND FOR VENESSA GAMET
E
refund for venessa garnet
2
001.000.257.620
100.0( +�
Total:
100.0( aa)
E
249007
9/16/2021
072585 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC
118067640
COVID - SUPPLIES/ AIR CARE BIO
U
COVID - SUPPLIES/ AIR CARE BIO
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
15,992.0( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
1, 786.5
Freight
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 90
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
249007 9/16/2021 072585 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC (Continued)
118125889
249008 9/16/2021 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 165178
249009 9/16/2021 012199 GRAINGER
249010 9/16/2021 076462 GREAT FLOORS LLC
249011 9/16/2021 078424 GREEN LATRINE INC
9027794404
9031501183
JB21-030481
15134
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
SALES TAX CORRECTION
Credit for sales tax correction on
001.000.66.518.30.35.00
Total
FLEET - TIRES
FLEET - TIRES
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
WA STATE TIRE FEE
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
Total
LIBRARY - PARTS/ V-BELT
LIBRARY - PARTS/ V-BELT
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ CIRCUL,
FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ CIRCUL,
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total
PUBLIC SAFETY - CARPET REPLAC
PUBLIC SAFETY - CARPET REPLAC
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
LATRINE FOR UPTOWN EVENING P
7.3.b
Page: 19
Amoun
1,185.9� ED
E
�a
a
-28.8"
18,935.65 3
c
�a
496.1 ,
t
4.0(
E
E
52.0� U
552.21 o
�a
0
a
138.4( Q
14.3E N
CD
o�
2,064.7< N
E
214.7z
2,432.2E
c
a�
E
t
63,566.2E
a
6,610.8�
70,177.1
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 91
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 20
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249011
9/16/2021
078424 GREEN LATRINE INC
(Continued)
LATRINE FOR UPTOWN EVENING P
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
515.0(
Total:
515.0(
249012
9/16/2021
074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS
1164753
OLD PW - SECURITY
OLD PW - SECURITY
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
55.0(
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
5.7'
Total :
60.7;
249013
9/16/2021
012560 HACH COMPANY
12632625
WWTP: PO 646 SYRINGE FILTERS,
PO 646 SYRINGE FILTERS, BOD NC
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
1,256.4(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
110.9-
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
142.2(
Total :
1,509.51
249014
9/16/2021
078503 HALLAGAN, KEVIN
OTF HALLAGAN
OTF HALLAGAN CONTRACT FOR A
OTF HALLAGAN CONTRACT FOR A
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
500.0(
Total :
500.0(
249015
9/16/2021
076306 HINGSTON, DEBBIE
2006011.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
35.0(
2006012.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
35.0(
2006026.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
2006033.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 92
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249015 9/16/2021 076306 HINGSTON, DEBBIE
249016 9/16/2021 078512 HOLLAND, SCOTT
249017 9/16/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 21
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
(D
001.000.239.200
70.0( E,
Total:
210.0( a
2006006.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
3
001.000.239.200
35.0(
Total:
35.0( y
Y
V
1010139
PM: POND PEBBLES, STRAINER, E
PM: POND PEBBLES, STRAINER, E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
146.0 � .
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
15.0E o
1394232
PM: FENCING
'@
PM: FENCING
o
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
233.9z a
10.3% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
24.1( "
1514690
PM: TAPE, VOLT KIT, SPRINKLER T,
N
PM: TAPE, VOLT KIT, SPRINKLER T,
CD
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
35.6E
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
3.6E E
2021807
PM: RIVER PEBBLES
PM: RIVER PEBBLES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
19.91 c
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.0E
2030011
PM: GLOVES, TWINE
PM: GLOVES, TWINE
Q
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
30.6�
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00 3.1 E
2074163 PM: BIT SET, ELECTRICAL TAPE, R
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 93
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 22
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249017
9/16/2021
067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
(Continued)
PM: BIT SET, ELECTRICAL TAPE, R
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
45.9' E
10.3% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.7<
3514327
PM: HAND PUMP, TAPE, MARKERS
3
PM: HAND PUMP, TAPE, MARKERS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
36.2<
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Y
3.7'
5021422
PM: LUMBER, NOZZLE
PM: LUMBER, NOZZLE
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
97.2;
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.01 o
7013633
PM: TOW CHAIN, WOOD
PM: TOW CHAIN, WOOD
o
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
61.1 , 0-
10.3% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
6.3( r
8523460
PM: PLIERSCD
N
PM: PLIERS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
21.9 1 c
10.3% Sales Tax
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.2E .
Total:
803.8f u
249018
9/16/2021
061013 HONEY BUCKET
0552289556
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH PAF
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH PAF
a�
E
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
2,398.6�
0552289557
MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCKI
MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCK[
Q
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
249.1 ,1
Total:
2,647.81
249019
9/16/2021
078513 HOPKINS, ALDEN
2006007.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 94
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 23
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249019
9/16/2021
078513
HOPKINS, ALDEN
(Continued)
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
(D
001.000.239.200
35.0( E
Total:
35.0( a
249020
9/16/2021
071642
HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC
14024
PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI(
L
PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI(
3
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
7,026.5,
Total:
7,026.5: N
U
249021
9/16/2021
075966
HULBERT, CARRIE
BID-0821 ED
BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER AUG
BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER AUG
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
2,766.61 .E
Total:
2,766.E u
249022
9/16/2021
076488
HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG
BID-ED2021-08
BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY AUGUST
_0
BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY AUGUST
f6
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
600.0( o
Total:
CL
600.0( a
Q
249023
9/16/2021
060165
HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
32034
E21 FB SERVICES THRU 8/21/21
r
E21 FB SERVICES THRU 8/21/21
N
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
2,542.3(
Total :
2,542.3( c
N
249024
9/16/2021
069733
ICONIX WATERWORKS INC
U2116044454
WATER - SUPPLIES
E
WATER - SUPPLIES
2
U
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
886.0E };
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
92.1 E E
U2116044477
SEWER - SUPPLIES
SEWER - SUPPLIES
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
256.5( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
26.6,
Total:
1,261.41
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 95
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249025 9/16/2021 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
3498961
3500622
249026 9/16/2021 072528 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SERVICES 62162
62284
62668
63678
64131
64217
64233
65247
PO # Description/Account
DSD MULTIPURPOSE PAPER - LET'
DSD Multipurpose Paper - Letter
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
PEDESTAL MOBILE FILE
Lorell Mobile File Pedestal
001.000.31.514.23.35.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.35.00
Total
INT SPANISH - 1A0465712
INT SPANISH - lA0465712
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH - lA0465712
INT SPANISH - 1A0465712
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH 10A466285
INT SPANISH 1A0466285
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH 1A0493229
INT SPANISH 1A0493229
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH - lA0493229
INT SPANISH - 1A0493229
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH - XZ0127001
INT SPANISH XZ0127001
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH - 9Z1166164
INT SPANISH - 9Z1166164
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
INT SPANISH - 9Z1166164
INT SPANISH 9Z1166164
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
7.3.b
Page: 24
Amoun
m
287.9, E
�a
a
29.9E
L
3
310.E ,
Y
32.3 -
660.8 j
E
100.0( o
�a
0
100.0( m
a
Q
100.0( N
o�
100.0( N
E
2
100.0( U
c
a�
E
100.0(
�a
a
100.0(
100.0(
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 96
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
249026 9/16/2021 072528 072528 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SERVICES (Continued)
249027 9/16/2021 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 3315132
249028 9/16/2021 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10091181
300-10091212
249029 9/16/2021 077218 INTRADO INTERACTION SVC CORP 137872
249030 9/16/2021 072627 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC
249031 9/16/2021 075265 KBA INC
249032 9/16/2021 062477 KEEP POSTED
7014031
3006154
23366
Description/Account
Total ;
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL D
International Code Council Dues -
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
Total
FLEET - PARTS
FLEET - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
FLEET - PARTS
FLEET - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
Total ;
CIVIC LIVE SUPPORT & MAINTENA
Civic Live Support Maintenance
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Total
MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT
Monthly 911 database maint
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Total
EOMA SERVICES THRU 8/31/21
EOMA SERVICES THRU 8/31/21
332.100.64.594.76.41.00
Total
BIRD FEST REGIONAL POSTING OI
7.3.b
Page: 25
Amoun
800.0(
r-
m
E
�a
145.0(
145.0( .-
3
c
�a
N
434.3E
a�
t
45.1,
E
25.4( o
�a
2.6z >
507.5E a
a
Q
4,100.0(
426.4( o
4,526.4( E
2
v
200.0(
200.0( E
�a
a
29,465.3,
29,465.3,
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 97
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 26
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249032
9/16/2021
062477 KEEP POSTED
(Continued)
BIRD FEST REGIONAL POSTING OI
120.000.31.575.42.41.00
300.0( E,
Total:
300.0( a
249033
9/16/2021
078508 KIDWELL, KATHERINE
2006001.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
3
001.000.239.200
224.0(
Total:
224.0( N
Y
V
249034
9/16/2021
071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER
9796 9799 SOCCER
9796 9799 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS
9796 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
694.2( .
9799 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
f6
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
694.2( o
9800 9801 SOCCER
9800 9801 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS
'@
9800 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
o
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
694.2( a
9801 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
Q-
Q
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
694.2(
9803 SOCCER
9803 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
N
9803 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
CD
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
694.2(
Total:
3,471.0( y
249035
9/16/2021
078522 KING, JEFF
2006027.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
70.0(
249036
9/16/2021
069080 KROHNE INC
S01/110267
WWTP: PO 583 DIGITAL PH SENSO
t
PO 583 DIGITAL PH SENSOR
Q
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
541.0(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
11.1 E
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 98
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 27
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249036
9/16/2021
069080 KROHNE INC
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
57.4,
Total:
609.5f
249037
9/16/2021
075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING
4714762
INV 4714762 - ACCT 2185-952778-8
AUG 2021 SHREDDING FEE
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
37.M
Total :
37.05
249038
9/16/2021
077996 LICHON, DEBORAH
2O06034.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
2006044.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total :
140.0(
249039
9/16/2021
074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO
047484 02
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
440.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
45.7
Total :
485.8 j
249040
9/16/2021
077987 MAJOR, TOMI
2006028.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
2006035.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
2006043.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
210.0(
249041
9/16/2021
078523 MANGUM, ZACHARY
2006029.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 99
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 28
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249041
9/16/2021
078523 MANGUM, ZACHARY
(Continued)
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
70.0(
249042
9/16/2021
078519 MCCAFFERTY, MATT
2006023.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total :
70.0(
249043
9/16/2021
076177 MCKINSTRY LOCKBOX
2020-157G
FACILITIES - F.A.C. - CITY ENERGY
FACILITIES - F.A.C. - CITY ENERGY
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
76,683.2�
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
7,975.0(
Total :
84,658.3!
249044
9/16/2021
020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
64301818
WWTP: PO 655 DUCT TAPE
PO 655 DUCT TAPE
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
141.3<
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
21.5<
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
16.9z
Total :
179.8(
249045
9/16/2021
078529 MEDAWAR, SAMIR
6000393622-002-0001
BL REFUND FOR SAMIR MEDAWAF
bl refund for samir medawar
001.000.257.620
50.0(
Tota I :
50.0(
249046
9/16/2021
078342 MICHEL, ROBIN
PLN2021-0043
PLANNING REFUND: OVERPAYMEI
Planning Refund: Overpayment
001.000.257.620
275.0(
Tota I :
275.0(
249047
9/16/2021
077970 MKHW CONSULTING LLC
COEWWTP-2
WWTP: FOR 1/1-8/13/21 (WORK NC
FOR 1/1-8/13/21 (WORK NOW COM
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 100
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249047 9/16/2021 077970 MKHW CONSULTING LLC
249048 9/16/2021 078516 MOE, RENDYN
249049 9/16/2021 078520 MOORE, RANDALL
249050 9/16/2021 078528 MY HEARING CENTERS LLC
249051 9/16/2021 076205 NET TRANSCRIPTS INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
2006017.009
2006024.009
604766742-001-0001
NT5638
249052 9/16/2021 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY SO11153526.001
249053 9/16/2021 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO 3233265-00
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total :
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
Total
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
Total
BL REFUND FOR MY HEARING CEO
bl refund for my hearing centers
001.000.257.620
Total
INV NT5638 - EDMONDS PD
CS 21-6053 TRANSCRIPTS
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
Total
WWTP: PO 651 A-B 9800-PC24AUTi
PO 651 A-B 9800-PC24AUTOA AUT(
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
Total
CITY PARK BUILDING - SERVICE &
CITY PARK BUILDING - SERVICE &
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
7.3.b
Page: 29
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 101
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 30
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249053
9/16/2021
064215
064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO (Continued)
Total :
1,272.9:
249054
9/16/2021
078521
NYSTROM, CHRIS
2006025.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total :
70.0(
249055
9/16/2021
078081
OLIVER, JAMES
2006008.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
35.0(
Tota I :
35.0(
249056
9/16/2021
075735
PACIFIC SECURITY
37655
SECURITY AUG 21
SECURITY AUG 21
001.000.23.512.50.41.00
4,149.9E
Total:
4,149.9E
249057
9/16/2021
075694
PACIFIC SOUND DESIGN
11977
UPTOWN EVENING MARKET STAG
UPTOWN EVENING MARKET STAG
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
1,400.0(
Total :
1,400.0(
249058
9/16/2021
065051
PARAMETRIX INC
27575
WWTP: THRU 5/29/21 ON CALL SE
THRU 5/29/21 ON CALL SERVICES
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
9,562.5(
Total:
9,562.5(
249059
9/16/2021
064690
PERINE DANFORTH COMPANY LLC
732958
UNIT 19 - PARTS
UNIT 19 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
251.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
26.1,
Tota I :
277.81
249060
9/16/2021
073871
PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC
41407
INV 41407 EDMONDS PD - AUGUST
WEB -BASED PEP TEST
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
20.0(
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 102
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 31
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249060
9/16/2021
073871
073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC (Continued)
Total :
20.0(
249061
9/16/2021
074793
PETDATA INC
9999
INV 9999 - AUG 2021 - EDMONDS P
E
E
12 - 1 YR PET LICENSE TAGS
�a
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
50.4(
1 REPLACEMENT TAG
=
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
4.2(
Total:
54.6(
�a
249062
9/16/2021
028860
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
1 W44523
TRAFFIC - PARTS
Y
TRAFFIC - PARTS
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
t
12.0< U
10.4% Sales Tax
E
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
1.2E
1 X69136
WWTP: PO 652 HOF A4AXFN & IDE
PO 652 HOF A4AXFN & IDE 30
o
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
M
451.9' o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
47.0( Q
Total:
512.21 --
249063
9/16/2021
073231
POLYDYNE INC
1572137
WWTP: PO 475 POLYMER (CLARIFI
T
N
PO 475 POLYMER (CLARIFLOC)
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
5,520.0( o
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
574.Of
1575333
WWTP: PO 475 POLYMER (CLARIFI
PO 475 POLYMER (CLARIFLOC)
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
16,560.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
1,722.21
Total :
241376.3: Q
249064
9/16/2021
029117
PORT OF EDMONDS
03870
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
4,011.5E
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 103
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 32
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249064
9/16/2021
029117 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
(Continued)
Total :
4,011.5E
249065
9/16/2021
078505 PRUNEDA, NINA
2005960.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
E
E
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
�a
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total :
70.0( .-
3
249066
9/16/2021
046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
200000704821
VENDOR CORRECTION - FRANCEr
Vendor Correction - FRANCES AND[
fd
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
N
553.2,
Total:
553.2, t
249067
9/16/2021
077429 PURE WATER AQUATICS
2626
PM SUPPLIES: LANE EXTENSIONS
E
PM SUPPLIES: LANE EXTENSIONS
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
1,288.1( ,-
10.4% Sales Tax
O
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
133.9( >
Total:
1,422.0E a
249068
9/16/2021
061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
3-0197-0800478
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
a
Q
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
r
N
243.3�CD
3-0197-0800897
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
c
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
39.4E N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
E
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
149.8� 2
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
};
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
149.8E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
E
t
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
149.8E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
Q
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
149.8�
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
149.8£
3-0197-0801132
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 104
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 33
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249068
9/16/2021
061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
(Continued)
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ;
(D
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
263.7. E,
3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
a
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
71.6E .3
Total:
1,367.6E
c
249069
9/16/2021
078502 RIGLEY, CATHERINE
BLD2021-1122
BUILDING REFUND: PERMIT NOT I
N
Building Refund: Permit not required
U
001.000.257.620
236.3E
Total:
236.3E
249070
9/16/2021
075288 RODARTE CONSTRUCTION INC
EOGA PMT3 FINAL
EOGA PMT3 FINAL THRU 8/20/2021
f°
EOGA PMT3 FINAL THRU 8/20/2021
U
423.000.75.594.35.65.30
0
14,524.1.' '@
EOGA PMT3 FINAL THRU 8/20/2021
0
112.000.68.595.61.65.00
14,671.0( a
Total :
29,195.1E Q
249071
9/16/2021
069593 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC
00446-710626
UNIT 55 - SOLAR INTERLAYER
r
UNIT 55 - SOLAR INTERLAYER
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
379.1
10.4% Sales Tax
o
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
39.4'
Total :
418.5,
249072
9/16/2021
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
S3-6606850
UNIT 664 - PARTS (RETURNED)
UNIT 664 - PARTS (RETURNED)
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
73.7E E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
7.6£ Q
S3-6610836
UNIT 664 - PARTS RETURNED
UNIT 664 - PARTS RETURNED
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-73.7f
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 105
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 34
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249072
9/16/2021
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
(Continued)
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-7.6£ ED
S3-6620853
UNIT 127 - PARTS/ WIPER MOTOR
E
UNIT 127 - PARTS/ WIPER MOTOR
ca
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
a
275.6£
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
28.6,
S5-6598506
FLEET - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS
FLEET - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
263.9E
Freight
t
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
35.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
M
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
31.1( Z
Total:
634.4: o
249073
9/16/2021
074825 SHELDON, DOUG
2006009.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
�a
>
0
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
a
001.000.239.200
35.0( Q
Total :
35.0E
249074
9/16/2021
078527 SHIBAYAMA, JENNY
2006041.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
T
N
CD
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
6
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
70.0( E
2
249075
9/16/2021
078525 SHORT, ANNE
2006036.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
U
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
E
Total:
70.0(
�a
249076
9/16/2021
036955 SKY NURSERY
T-1876723
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
Q
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
74.9E
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
7.7,
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 106
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249076 9/16/2021 036955 036955 SKY NURSERY
249077 9/16/2021 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY LLC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 35
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
Total :
82.61,
9751 SKYHAWKS
9751 SKYHAWKS SOCCER CAMP II
m
E
9751 SKYHAWKS SOCCER CAMP II
�a
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
198.0(
9753 SKYHAWKS
9753 SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL
=
9753 SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL
3
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
555.0(
c
9754 SKYHAWKS
9754 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
N
9754 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
Y
U
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
89.2E
9755 SKYHAWKS
9755 SKYHAWKS MULTI -SPORT CA
9755 SKYHAWKS MULTI -SPORT CA
E
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
616.2E
2
9759 SKYHAWKS
9759 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
o
9759 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
'@
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
298.0(
o
9761 SKYHAWKS
9761 SKYHAWKS TENNIS CAMP IN;
a
9761 SKYHAWKS TENNIS CAMP IN;
Q-
Q
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
372.5(
"
9762 SKYHAWKS
9762 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
N
9762 SKYHAWKS MINI -HAWK CAMI
CD
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
856.7E
9763 SKYHAWKS
9763 SKYHAWKS MULTI -SPORT CA
9763 SKYHAWKS MULTI -SPORT CA
E
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
46.2E
.�
9764 SKYHAWKS
9764 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI
9764 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
231.2E
E
9765 SKYHAWKS
9765 SKYHAWKS VOLLEYBALL CAI
9765 SKYHAWKS VOLLEYBALL CAI
+a
001.000.64.571.25.41.00 335.2E Q
9766 SKYHAWKS 9766 SKYHAWKS TENNIS CAMP IN;
9766 SKYHAWKS TENNIS CAMP IN;
001.000.64.571.25.41.00 596.0(
9770 SKYHAWKS 9770 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 107
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
249077 9/16/2021 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY LLC (Continued)
249078 9/16/2021 078504 SMITH, BILL
249079 9/16/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2005953.009
200202919
200326460
200493153
200663953
201054327
201103561
201501277
201532926
201711785
PO # Description/Account
9770 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
Total
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION:
001.000.239.200
Total
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15(
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @
7.3.b
Page: 36
Amoun
633.7.E E
4,828.2° a
a�
3
695.0(
695.0( y
Y
V
a�
t
76.7E .
�a
0
18.8E
0
a
30.7, Q
N
56.5E W
o�
0
18.31 E
39.2�
a�
E
t
16.0z
a
146.7E
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 108
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249079 9/16/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 37
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
N
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
8.6 1
202139655
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
E
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
ca
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
a
26.2,
202161535
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
3
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
317.2E
202250635
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
Y
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
18.8� t
202356739
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
30.2E
202499539
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
p
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
304.5E o
202529186
STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @
a
STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @
Q
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
3,955.0- .r
202529202
STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40(
04
STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40
6
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
110.5E 6
202576153
STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C
N
STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C
E
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
13,536.91 2
202579488
STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2
..
STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
378.8' E
204714893
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
f°
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
6.1- Q
204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 158.7(
204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 109
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 38
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249079 9/16/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
(Continued)
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
(D
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
86.5E
E
204714943
STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10
a
STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
18.8,
.3
204714950
STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
134.9E
Y
205184385
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV
t
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
20.4,
205307580
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
154.5E
o
221593742
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
�a
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
o
L
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
63.4,
a
222398059
SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY
Q
22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet -
.r
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
73.8 1
T
N
222704272
WWTP: 8/11-9/3/21 FLOWMETER 1(
o
8/11-9/3/21 FLOW METER 2400 HIC
o�
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
13.7z
0
N
222721177
STORMWATER PUMP STATION - 51
E
STORMWATER LIFT STATION - 51 V
2
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
32.2'
U
};
222818874
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A)
Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S /
E
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
13.7z
Total:
19,867.9E
a
249080 9/16/2021 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT
IN0077012 (B)
YOST POOL PERMIT ACCT AR0004!
YOST POOL PERMIT ACCT AR0004!
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
433.0(
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 110
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
249080 9/16/2021 037800 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT (Continued)
249081 9/16/2021 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 68598
249082 9/16/2021 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
249083 9/16/2021 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE
249084 9/16/2021 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
103587
104757
201159
57099
Description/Account
Total
INV 68598 - EDMONDS PD
LOCKER MAGNETS - WEISBERG
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
MAILBOX TAG - WEISBERG
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Total
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
WWTP: FINAL ROLLOFF ASH DISP(
Rolloff Ash disposal & taxes
423.000.76.535.80.47.65
WWTP: 8/30 & 8/31/21 PICKUPS
8/30 & 8/31/21 PICKUPS
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
Total
FIRE STATION 20 - SERVICE CALL/
FIRE STATION 20 - SERVICE CALL/
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
L144057 08-2021 AUDIT FEES
08-2021 Audit Fees
001.000.39.514.20.41.50
08-2021 Audit Fees
111.000.68.543.30.41.50
7.3.b
Page: 39
Amoun
433.0(
r-
m
E
�a
4.5(
L
7.0(
c
�a
3.7.' y
Y
1.5�
16.8' E
0
1,141.0,
0
a
347.0( Q
N
56.7z CD
1,544.81
0
N
E
984.0(
c
102.3z
1,086.3z t
�a
a
Page: 39
Packet Pg. 111
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 40
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249084
9/16/2021
039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
(Continued)
08-2021 Audit Fees
m
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
339.3( E,
08-2021 Audit Fees
a
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
339.3(
08-2021 Audit Fees
3
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
339.3( M
Total:
2,262.0(
249085
9/16/2021
071585 STERICYCLE INC
3005692794
INV 3005692794 - CUST 6076358 - E
N
MED BOX DISPOSAL
001.000.41.521.80.41.00
121.5E
Total:
121.5E
249086
9/16/2021
078507 SULLIVAN, MARY
2005968.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
o
'@
001.000.239.200
78.0( o
Total:
78.0( a
a
249087
9/16/2021
072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT
9841 9861 BEACH CAMP
9841 9861 BEACH CAMP
Q
9841 BEACH CAMP
r
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
N
9,907.2( W
9861 BEACH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
rn
9,898.6( c
9862 9863 BEACH CAMP
9862 9863 BEACH CAMP
9862 BEACH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
10,384.5(
9863 BEACH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
9,890.0(
9864 9865 BEACH CAMP
9864 9865 BEACH CAMP
t
9864 BEACH CAMP
R
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
9,404.1( Q
9865 BEACH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
9,898.6(
9866 9867 BEACH CAMP
9866 9867 BEACH CAMP
9866 BEACH CAMP
Page: 40
Packet Pg. 112
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 41
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249087
9/16/2021
072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
9,890.0(
9867 BEACH CAMP
E
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
9,404.1( a
Total:
78,677.1(
L
249088
9/16/2021
078526 TAIRA, DIXIE
2006037.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
3
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
c
001.000.239.200
�a
70.0( y
Total:
70.0(
249089
9/16/2021
040916 TC SPAN AMERICA
95079
FAC MAINT - SCREENPRINTING T-;
FAC MAINT - SCREENPRINTING T-;
E
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
141.0( E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
.-
14.6E '@
Total:
155.6E o
L
249090
9/16/2021
078514 TELLER, KATIE
2006013.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
a
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
Q
001.000.239.200
35.0( r
Total :
35.0( W
r.
249091
9/16/2021
078300 TERRY BALL POLYGRAPH LLC
2021-159
INV 2021-159 EDMONDS PD 8-19-2,
c
PRE -EMPLOY EXAM 8/19/21
N
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
250.0( •E
Total:
250.0( U
249092
9/16/2021
066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES
9702
VISIT EDMONDS DIGITALADS FOR
a�
VISIT EDMONDS DIGITAL ADS FOR
E
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
1,500.0(
Total :
1,500.0(
a
249093
9/16/2021
075587 THE UPS STORE #6392
0030
WWTP: 8/2021 SHIP CHGS
8/2021 Ship Charges
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
26.8E
Page: 41
Packet Pg. 113
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 42
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
249093
9/16/2021
075587 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392
(Continued)
Total :
26.8E
249094
9/16/2021
072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY
131792
MONTHLY BASE CHARGE FOR HP
Monthly base charge for HP Pagewid,
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
175.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
18.2(
Total :
193.2(
249095
9/16/2021
073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC
PSV2176220
FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS
FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4,265.8"
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
443.6z
Total :
4,709.4E
249096
9/16/2021
072800 TOYOTA LIFT NORTHWEST
24873687
WWTP: PO 645 30 WT OIL & FILTEF
PO 645 30 WT OIL & FILTER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
149.4(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
15.5z
Total :
164.9z
249097
9/16/2021
078506 TRAVERSO, LORIE
2005965.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Tota I :
70.0(
249098
9/16/2021
077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
145453
STORM - DUMP FEES
STORM - DUMP FEES
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
931.5(
Total:
931.5(
249099
9/16/2021
064423 USA BLUE BOOK
712922
WWTP: PH 4.00, 7U.00 & 10.00 BUF
PH 4.00, 7U.00 & 10.00 BUFFERS
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
140.5E
Freight
Page: 42
Packet Pg. 114
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
249099 9/16/2021 064423 USA BLUE BOOK (Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
249100 9/16/2021 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
249101 9/16/2021 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC
9887433360
8805858155
8805868345
8805913626
8805964850
249102 9/16/2021 073832 WA ST DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SVCS 9512230
Total :
C/A 442201730-00001
iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
Total
WWTP: PO 647 INFLUENT TSS STA
PO 647 INFLUENT TSS STAND
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: PO 647 BEAKER
PO 647 BEAKER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: PO 647 BEAKER
PO 647 BEAKER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: PO 647 BLENDER COMM
PO 647 BLENDER COMM
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
Total
WWTP: 8/2021 C511 PROJECT MGI`
7.3.b
Page: 43
Page: 43
Packet Pg. 115
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
249102 9/16/2021 073832 WA ST DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SVCS (Continued)
249103 9/16/2021 047455 WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE 41 JZ0249 L015
249104 9/16/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 12385627 CR
249105 9/16/2021 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
12426195
45904171
PO # Description/Account
8/2021 C511 PROJECT MGMT FEE:
423.100.76.594.39.41.00
Total
E7JA SERVICES THRU JULY 2021
E7JA SERVICES THRU JULY 2021
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
Total
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES (RETURNEI
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES (RETURNEI
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Total
8099 ENVELOPES
ENVELOPES #10
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
ENVELOPES #10 POLY
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
8100 UTILITY BILLING - 5000 WINDOW &
UTILITY BILLING - 5000 WINDOW &
7.3.b
Page: 44
Amoun
m
49,496.1 ,, E,
49,496.1, Q
a�
3
78.0�
78.05 N
U
a�
t
-6.3( .
�a
U
-0.6( o
�a
0
537.0( a
a
Q
55.8E
N
0
155.0(
0
16.1, E
757.01 'ca
c
a�
345.0( t
368.0( Q
38.2
Page: 44
Packet Pg. 116
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249105 9/16/2021 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 45
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
N
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
237.E 1 y
UTILITY BILLING - 5000 WINDOW &
E
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
237.6, a
UTILITY BILLING - 5000 WINDOW &
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
237.6E .3
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
24.7, cm
10.4% Sales Tax
N
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
Y
24.7,
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
24.7' E
8102
REGULAR ENVELOPES FOR DSD
Regular Envelopes for DSD
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
245.0E o
10.4% Sales Tax
�a
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
25.4E o
8103
UTILITY BILLING - 2500 #9 RETURN
a
UTILITY BILLING - 2500 #9 RETURN
a
Q
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
61.6 , r
UTILITY BILLING - 2500 #9 RETURNCD
N
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
61.6,
UTILITY BILLING - 2500 #9 RETURN
c
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
61.6E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
6.4' u
10.4% Sales Tax
};
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
6.4'
10.4% Sales Tax
E
t
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
6.4,
8105
BUSINESS CARDS
bus cards for dev services
a
001.000.62.524.20.31.00 66.0(
bus cards for clerks
001.000.25.514.30.31.00 33.0(
Page: 45
Packet Pg. 117
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 46
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
249105
9/16/2021
073552 WELCO SALES LLC
(Continued)
bus cards for council member
m
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
33.0( E
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.62.524.20.31.00
6.8
10.4% Sales Tax
3
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
3.4;
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
3.4; Y
Total:
2,158.81, u
t
249106
9/16/2021
074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH
2358290
INV 2358290 - JULY&AUG - EDMON
JULY & AUG 2021 RANGE FEES
E
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
228.2( Z
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
23.8( �a
Total:
252.0( o
L
Q
249107
9/16/2021
076084 WHATMORE, JEFF
2006018.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
Q-
Q
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
001.000.239.200
70.0( N
2006031.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
CD
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
001.000.239.200
70.0( N
2006042.009
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
E
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOl'
ca
001.000.239.200
70.0(
Total:
210.0( c
a)
249108
9/16/2021
049905 WHITNEY EQUIPMENT CO INC
93476
WWTP: PO 656 REPLACED FLYGT
REPLACED FLYGT 3127
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
12,694.5( Q
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
261.2(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
1,347.3�
Page: 46
Packet Pg. 118
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
249108 9/16/2021 049905 049905 WHITNEY EQUIPMENT CO INC (Continued)
249109 9/16/2021 064213 WSSUATREASURER 694
249110 9/16/2021 078389 ZENNER USA
249111 9/16/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
Description/Account
Total ;
SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: AUGI
SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: AUGI
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
Total
0061479-IN
WATER - INVENTORY
WATER - INVENTORY
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
Total
206-188-0247
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
253-003-6887
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
253-011-1177
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
253-012-9189
WWTP: 8/25-9/24/21 AUTO DIALER
7.3.b
Page: 47
Amoun
14,303.05 4
C
m
E
�a
4,340.0(
4,340.0( .3
c
�a
N
3,364.5E
0
t
259.0� U
3,623.61 ,E
�a
0
273.5, >
0
L
273.5E a
c
42.1 E
rn
0
6.4(
.;
24.4< u
c
24.4<
t
24.4<
a
24.4'
24.4'
Page: 47
Packet Pg. 119
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
249111 9/16/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
166 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
166 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.b
Page: 48
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
8/25-9/24/21 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOIC
(D
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
41.5E E
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
a
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
139.1- 3
425-771-5553
WWTP: 8/25-9/24/21 AUTO DIALER:
8/25-9/24/21 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUS
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
130.9E Y
425-774-1031
LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACC[
LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRA[
t
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
47.5(
425-775-7865
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
71.9, o
425-776-1281
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
�a
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
o
L
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
59.0E a
425-776-2742
LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACC[
Q
LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACC
.r
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
T
26.4, N
425-776-5316
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
o
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
o�
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
0
114.1( N
425-776-6829
CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P
E
CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A
2
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
U
139.1- };
Total :
1,487.6:
E
Bank total :
883,654.7E
�a
Total vouchers : 883,654.71 Q
Page: 48
Packet Pg. 120
vchlist
09/16/2021 8:05:37AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
7.3.b
Page: 49
Amoun
Page: 49
Packet Pg. 121
7.3.c
vchlist
09/08/2021 3:23:47PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
9082021 9/8/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun . .
ui
0091
US BANK - SEPTEMBER (EW)
c
COURTYARD - HOTEL ACCOMODA7
E
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
542.1 E
SHUTTLE EXPRESS - AIRPORT
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
123.9( .�
BEACON PUBLISHING (STORM MVN
3
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
192.0( c
AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES
ca
001.000.22.518.10.31.00
16.5E
0091
US BANK - SEPTEMBER (EW)
REIMBURSED BAGGAGE FEES FOI
U
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
-30.0( .
REIMBURSED FOR CANCELLED FL
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
-537.9E c
RETURNED INCORRECT BADGE RI
'@
001.000.22.518.10.31.00
-97.1.E c
0808
US BANK - SEPTEMBER (JNH)
a
SURVEYMONKEY DEPARTMENT A(
Q-
Q
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
993.6E "
4697
CLICK2MAIL
N
Canva - 9/2021
00
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
12.9E 0w
CS/ED postcard production cost
o
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
m
893.6, •3
CS/ED postcard postage
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
1,106.0E m
5639
PAYFLOW PAYMENT PROCESSOR
E
Payflow payment processor
U
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
15.7< +°
Payflow payment processor
Q
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
15.7<
Payflow payment processor
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
15.7z
8017
ENG CREDIT CARD AUGUST 2021
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 122
vchlist
09/08/2021 3:23:47PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
9082021 9/8/2021 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.3.c
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
y
Office folders
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
49.6E E
EOFB Click-2-Mail
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
34.8E
E7FG PSSH Contribution
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
309.0( 3
Total:
3,656.4E
�a
Bank total :
3,656.4E Y
U
Q
Total vouchers :
3,656.4E U
E
2
U
4-
0
�a
0
L
Q
a
r
N
00
O
CA
O
L
3
r
c
m
E
M
U
�a
a
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 123
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
-
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
LSTM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
2019 Traffic Calming 1
i038
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
ES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
MR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
ISTR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STPW
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
STR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STR
2021 Guardrail Installations
i057
STR
2021 Overlay Program
i051
E21 CA
STR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i062 _
E21 DB
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i060
E21 CC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
STR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21 AA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059
E21 CB
STR
2022 Overlay Program
i063
E22CA
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC
STR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
i066
E22CD
STR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
i064
E22CB
STR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
IL STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave Overlay (196th W
i052
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STR
89th PI W Retaining
i025
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
S
MOT
tywide Bi rovements Project
i050
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
■ STR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements"M�=I
i026
E7DC
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 124
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
IL WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
' FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab#
c443
E4MB
STM
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
c564
E21 FE
STR
Edmonds Street Wattint Connector
c478
ESDB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
m Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
&STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
SW R
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0l l
ESGB
t Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
=c461
STR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
(Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
Vb Slope Repair & Stabilizatjon
m105
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
hase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
E21 FD
SW R
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
lase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21GB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
ELLM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
i055
E20CE
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
orm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c49
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements -MMEEk—
MM&354
MWE1DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
e STR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
4
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
MoorWaterfront
Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 125
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STIR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STIR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
EOCC
2020 Waterline Overlay=
STIR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
LS
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Pro'
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
Civic Center Playfield (Desig
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E20CB
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STIR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
STIR
E21AA
iO56
2021 Traffic Calming
1AB
2021 Guardrail Installations
STIR
E21 CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
_
E21 CB
Jok
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i06O
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
E21 CD
J�
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STIR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
9K
E21 DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility _
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
c563
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21 FE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
E22CA
i063
2022Wrlay Prog�r
STIR
E22CB
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STIR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STIR
E22CD
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
E3DB
-ALI=
St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Av
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Stud
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 126
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
c474
Bikelink Project
STIR
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
eaview Park Infiltration Facility
SWR
E5GB
sol l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modification
c481
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
E51KA
c473 ,
Five Corners Reservoir Re-coattn
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
s0la Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining W
STIR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
NPDES (Students Saving Salmc
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
9r
PRK
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STIR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
'Wi029
E8CA
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E8CC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
E8DB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STIR
E8DC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
2018 Lorian Woods Study
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES
E8,113
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
Ir PM
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STIR
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STR
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STIR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
STM
E9FA
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 127
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
PM
EBMA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
ESKA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STR
ESDA
c474
Bikelink Project
STR
ESDB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
ESFD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
WWTP
ESHA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
ESJB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
SWR
EBGA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
EBFB
c521
174th St. & 71stAve Storm Improvements
WTR
EBJA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
EBFC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
WTR
E21JA
c558
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
STM
E21FB
c560
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
SWR
E21 GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
STM
E21 FD
c563
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21 FE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
STR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 128
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STR
EBAB
i028
220th Adaptive
STR
EBCA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
EBCC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STR
E21 CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
STR
E20CB
i052
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STR
EOCC
i053
2020 Waterline Overlay
STR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STR
E21AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STR
E21AB
i057
2021 Guardrail Installations
STR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
WTR
E21CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
STM
E21 CD
i061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E21 DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
STR
E22CA
i063
2022 Overlay Program
STR
E22CB
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STR
E22CD
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
ESGB
sol l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s02O
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
STR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
WTR
EOJB
s026
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 129
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
STM
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STM
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
E21 FD
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STM
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
c564
E21 FE
STIR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STIR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STIR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STIR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STIR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STIR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STIR
2021 Guardrail Installations
i057
E21AB
STIR
2021 Overlay Program
i051
E21 CA
STIR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STIR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
i052
E20CB
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 130
7.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
ElCA
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
EODC
STR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
STR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
i055
E20CE
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STIR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
STR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i061
E21 DB
STR
2022 Overlay Program
i063
E22CA
STR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
i064
E22CB
STR
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC
STR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
i066
E22CD
STR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i060
E21 CC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0ll
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21GB
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
EBJB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059
E21 CB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
Revised 9/15/2021 Packet Pg. 131
7.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Robert Holt
Staff Lead: NA
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Robert Holt
Narrative
Robert Holt
1445 10th PI N
($10,000 - $120,000)
Attachments:
Holt, Robert - Claim for Damages
Packet Pg. 132
Claim for Damages Form
For Official Use Only
Claimant Information
Claimant's name:
Current residential address:
Mailing address (if different):
Residential address at the time of the incident (if different from current address):
Claimant's daytime phone number (work, home or cell)
Claimant's email address:
wO%qy
Incident Information (�
Date of the incident: 4/DT1me:
if I
If the incident occurred over a period of time, date of first
and last occurrences:
From:
T
SP'l
nant
Date of Birth:
Location of incident: I L4 j5z CJ " ` �L ' ■~' 1 J
?Y_75f2n&rn-1- r"52� 2U
addresses and telephone numbers of all persons involved in or witness to this incident:
f
Name of all of our employees having knowledge of this incident:
Name, addresses and telephone numbers of all individuals not already identified above that have knowledge
regarding the issues involved in this incident or knowledge of the claimant's resulting damages. Please
include a brief description as to the nature and extent of each person's knowledge. Attach additional sheets
if necessary. _
M
o
i - gi -y 3S -- 7&$(a
Describe the cause of the injury or damages. Explain the extent of the property loss or medical, physical or
mental injuries. Attach additional sheets if necessary. +
J -' ' I IrP A /T v1 n !1 /2-0 r � Ir■ 1 1 ! 7!1 l � �l�1.'�Jt_�L�/j .� C�
r�� u�r d�� 1►� �-f I l�ii�� � �� F� C�aw��
hlZet
Packet Pg. 133
taGlr�wa,
7.4.a
C�
E
R
L
O
�C
E
U
O
tm
Cu
E
R
L
O
E
M
U
d
O
O
2
r
C
d
E
t
v
r
Packet Pg. 134
7.4.a
Has this incident been reported to law enforcement? If so, which agency and name of officer (if known).
!u
Have you filed a claim with your insurance carrier? If so, what is their name, phone number and claim
number? 1` 1
D
Name address and telephone numbers of treating medical providers. Please attach billings and records if
available.
Please attach any other documentation that you believe support your claim's allegations
*Additional Information Required for Automobile Claims Only*
License Plate # Year/ Make/ Model
Driver Name, Address & Phone
Owner Name, Address & Phone
assenger sName, Address & Phone
I am claiming damages in the amount of
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington the foregoing is true and correct.
This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the
Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf or by a court -
approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant.
Signature of Claimant Date
(if notarized, for notary to complete)
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the
person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
Dated:
My appointment expires:
Signature: Title:
N
m
M
E
M
`o
4-
E
U
Packet Pg. 135
7.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
July 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
July 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Attachments:
July 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Packet Pg. 136
I 7.5.a I
OF
EDP
� d
lac. 1 $9v
CITY OF EDMONDS
MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
JULY 2021
Packet Pg. 137 1
I 7.5.a I
Page 1 of 1
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Receives
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 42,450,777
$ 22,424,193
$ 25,583,320
$ 16,867,457
60
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
300,000
212,500
-
300,000
0
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
2,620
-
-
2,620
0
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,010
2,500
2,500
2,510
50
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
-
100
150
(150)
0
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
165,370
64,120
1,645
163,725
1
Ill
STREET FUND
1,722,360
1,043,886
1,042,541
679,819
61
C
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
3,068,385
1,519,898
1,135,453
1,932,932
37
Q'
O
117
MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND
165,060
30,433
27,138
137,922
16
cC
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
270
377
447
(177)
166
U
C
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
71,460
37,265
34,240
37,220
48
'0
C
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
25,240
11,347
11,638
13,602
46
LL
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,390
253
306
1,084
22
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
24,000
12,874
12,768
11,232
53
=O
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1
1,282,050
779,770
1,505,209
(223,159)
117
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1
1,285,240
774,671
1,496,114
(210,874)
116
N
127
GIFTSCATALOGFUND
103,930
44,080
41,374
62,556
40
�+
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
179,800
91,281
168,463
11,337
94
v
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
2,200
3,106
3,685
(1,485)
167
C
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
29,220
27,524
40,206
(10,986)
138
Q'
d
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,120
2,712
2,737
7,383
27
w
T
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
79,239
50,999
60,185
19,054
76
C
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSINGFUND
65,000
38,233
40,407
24,593
62
O
C
142
EDMONDS CARES FUND
5,946,550
-
5,946,550
-
100
LL
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
759,710
47,291
40,853
718,857
5
z
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
1,392,520
1,370,896
385,689
1,006,831
28
r
0
O
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
30,870
5,590
(5,590)
0
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
10,299,357
5,537,237
5,845,898
4,453,459
57
N
422
2
STORM UTILITY FUND
6,265,225
3,362,834
3,903,543
2,361,682
62
>%
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 3
31,130,450
7,741,047
12,990,644
18,139,806
42
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,549
600,423
1,385,447
30
r
d
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,331,100
1,042,540
886,499
444,601
67
E
z
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,204,880
704,165
715,800
489,080
59
0
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
67,270
54,306
-
67,270
0
Q
$ 111,4219673
$ 47,679,859
$ 62,532,012
$ 48,889,661
56
1 2021 REET revenues are $1,446,881 higher than 2020 revenues.
2 Difference primarily due to a Grant reimbursement in January 2021, as well as 2021 storm rate increase of 5ya
3 Differences primarily due to WWTP billings to their partners in January 2021.
1
Packet Pg. 138
I 7.5.a I
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF EDMONDS
NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
No.
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
7/31/2020
Expenditures
7/31/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 45,978,718
$ 24,352,711
$ 24,346,357
$ 21,632,361
539
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
467,140
152,182
193,928
273,212
420
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
-
-
5,900
09
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
210,222
-
210,222
09
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
20,000
16,149
3,851
819
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
123,581
123,581
-
1009
019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
111 STREET FUND
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
136 PARKS TRUST FUND
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
142 EDMONDS CARES FUND
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
421 WATER UTILITY FUND
422 STORM UTILITY FUND
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
424 BOND RESERVE FUND
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
28,445
-
28,445
-
1009 F
45,800
25,966
-
45,800
09 Q.
2,187,430
1,288,056
1,256,963
930,467
O
579
2,862,297
754,649
1,307,320
1,554,977
469 t�
236,880
15,394
22,318
214,562
99
C
87,150
32,558
32,289
54,861
379 j,L
26,880
-
-
26,880
09
3,000
450
-
3,000
r
09
29,900
3,509
-
29,900
09
1,601,298
873,135
246,022
1,355,276
159 G
2,053,911
1,029,190
568,724
1,485,187
289
100,900
44,045
32,879
68,021
330
200,998
93,211
118,129
82,869
599
50,000
-
-
50,000
09 Q.
25,000
19,211
5,789
d
779 !Y
11,900
11
-
11,900
04
76,340
34,573
30,144
46,196
399 r-
C
5,946,550
157,111
-
5,946,550
09 jL
759,700
47,291
40,853
718,847
59 s
5,552,490
691,684
243,769
5,308,721
r
49 C
O
10,760,050
6,248,077
4,219,882
6,540,168
399
7,293,890
4,716,272
2,621,939
4,671,951
r
369 cm
40,492,284
6,336,967
14,690,197
25,802,087
369 C,
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
309
1,429,954
582,608
799,843
630,111
56° C
1,257,909
612,976
572,585
685,324
469 a)
96,167
51,294
63,132
33,035
669 V
M
$ 132,008,554
$ 48,760,462
$ 52,195,076
$ 79,813,478
404 Q
2
Packet Pg. 139
7.5.a
Page 1 of 3
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 7/31/2020 7/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 4
2 EMS PROPERTY TAX 4
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 5
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
8 GAS UTILITY TAX
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
10 WATERUTILITY TAX
11 SEWERUTILITYTAX
12 STORMWATER UTILITY TAX
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
15 PULLTABS TAX
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
$ 10,936,400
$ 5,630,039
$ 5,820,281
$ 5,116,119
53%
4,137,031
2,198,233
2,295,063
1,841,968
55%
500
14
1
499
0%
8,600,000
4,450,258
5,699,002
2,900,998
66%
7,600
4,563
6,644
956
87%
828,500
442,273
529,162
299,338
64%
1,710,000
1,091,103
1,105,355
604,645
65%
595,000
463,305
489,128
105,872
82%
364,000
211,482
204,210
159,790
56%
1,153,000
593,821
514,074
638,926
45%
894,600
429,969
528,207
366,393
59%
471,900
276,629
299,942
171,958
64%
722,000
469,410
460,775
261,225
64%
723,000
424,830
322,813
400,187
45%
55,200
37,754
52,580
2,620
95%
350
367
143
207
41%
295,900
147,475
143,456
152,444
48%
31,4949981
16,871,525
18,470,834
13,0249147
59%
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
18
FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
250
315
450
(200)
180%
19
POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
700
80
-
700
0%
20
VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
50,000
1,135
18,595
31,405
37%
21
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
702,700
511,351
500,753
201,947
71%
22
FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
41,000
23,585
22,286
18,714
54%
23
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER
100,600
39,115
32,964
67,636
33%
24
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DIST RICT FRANCHISE
434,000
174,817
271,246
162,754
62%
25
GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
201,000
134,698
138,903
62,097
69%
26
DEVSERVPERMIT SURCHARGE
58,700
39,175
51,550
7,150
88%
27
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
30,000
-
14,440
15,560
48%
28
BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
650,600
468,518
433,381
217,219
67%
29
ANIMAL LICENSES
22,000
8,572
8,799
13,201
40%
30
STREET AND CURB PERMIT
50,000
73,892
35,101
14,899
70%
31
OTRNON-BUSLICTERMITS
20,000
10,261
11,328
8,672
57%
2,361,550
1,485,513
1,539,796
821,754
65%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
32
DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE
-
559
-
-
0%
33
DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
6,000
2,052
6,464
(464)
108%
34
TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT
4,000
-
-
4,000
0%
35
HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
7,100
-
916
6,184
13%
36
CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2
-
-
3,947
(3,947)
0%
37
WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT
-
-
3,448
(3,448)
0%
38
DOC FAC ROOFING
-
-
379,270
(379,270)
0%
39
WA STATE ART COMMISSION 2021-003-CD
-
-
6,000
(6,000)
0%
40
STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
198,000
-
-
198,000
0%
41
PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX
210,500
-
-
210,500
0%
42
2022-2023 BIENNIUM ONE-TIME ALLOCATION
-
-
168,950
(168,950)
0%
43
ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT
-
3,829
-
0%
44
SCHOOL ZONE
-
825
-
-
0%
45
CJ - POPULATION
13,070
9,803
10,362
2,708
79%
46
TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
16,740
8,076
8,070
8,670
48%
47
CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
45,600
35,117
36,923
8,677
81%
48
MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
60,000
32,974
35,791
24,209
60%
49
DUI - CITIES
4,500
4,448
5,143
(643)
114%
50
FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX
-
-
53,334
(53,334)
0%
51
LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
261,500
191,593
216,694
44,806
83%
52
LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
343,200
169,254
167,820
175,380
49%
53
FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
2,000
3,057
335
1,665
17%
54
DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
550
-
-
550
0%
55
INTERLOCAL GRANTS
-
-
27,216
(27,216)
0%
56
VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS
-
-
66,000
(66,000)
0%
1,172,760
461,586
1,196,682
(23,922)
102%
4 2021 Real Personal/Property Taxis $190,242 higher than 2020, and EMS Property Taxis $96,829 higher for total of $287,071.
5 2021 Local Retail Sa/es Use Tax revenues are $1,248,744 higher than 2020 revenues. Please also seepages pages 18 & 19.
O
CL
O
U
C
M
C
IL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
O
Q.
d
U
C
M
C
IL
s
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
A
7
r
C
d
z
t)
to
r�
a
Packet Pg. 140 1
I 7.5.a I
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 7/31/2020
Title Budget Revenues
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
13 PHOTOCOPIES
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES
17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES(SNO-ISLE)
18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
24 LEGAL SERVICES
25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
26 BOOKING FEES
27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
33 PLAN CHECKING FEES
34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
35 PLANNING 1 % INSPECTION FEE
36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES
39 PROGRAM FEES 6
40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
41 WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES
42 UP TOWN EVENING MARKET FEES
43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
7/31/2021 Amount
Revenues Remaining % Received
$ 3,000 $
2,917 $
3,566
$ (566)
1190/(
600
37
98
502
160/(
11,000
4,394
3,322
7,678
300/(
150
7
2
148
10/(
300
51
-
300
00/c
-
235
168
(168)
00/(
4,000
2,161
98
3,902
20/c
1,000
419
375
625
370/(
50
46
117
(67)
2340/(
100
9
-
100
00/(
25,100
-
-
25,100
00/(
600
-
-
600
00/, 0
CL
1,000
394
165
835
160/( G1
500
-
-
500
00/c
200,000
174,486
147,941
52,059
740/(
1,400
-
-
1,400
0%
85,000
55,485
49,902
35,098
590/( to
10,000
5,795
-
10,000
0%
30,000
-
-
30,000
0% >,
76,800
36,753
2,505
74,295
3% t
195,000
149,144
153,619
41,381
790/( C
-
38
20
(20)
0°/ G
57,000
47,791
45,982
11,018
810/( 2
1,050
325
309
741
290/( j
38,000
23,597
18,812
19,188
5001( N
3,000
1,584
610
2,390
200/c
10,000
15,098
16,202
(6,202)
1620/(
3,500
2,281
1,427
2,073
410/(
1,007,500
504,820
465,101
542,399
460/(
2,500
1,551
2,140
360
860/( O
50
-
-
50
0% 4)
65,600
51,675
70,163
(4,563)
1070/( W
350,900
169,371
305,471
45,429
870/( �p
4,000
13,073
11,349
(7,349)
2840/( .v
500
-
158
342
320/( r_
3,000
1,480
3,700
(700)
1230/( C
14,000
10,807
10,450
3,550
750/( LL
15,500
3,083
31
15,469
00/, s
900,662
92,329
315,996
584,666
350/( r-
1,300
-
-
1,300
0°/ C
z
5,000
1,560
3,885
1,115
780/(
2,040
(2,040)
00/( N
800
-
-
800
0°/ N
2,892,106
1,683,106
1,966,602
925,504
680/( >,
6,021,568
3,055,899
3,602,324
2,419,244
607%
r
C
d
1=
z
tt
to
a
6 2021 Parks & Recreation Program Revenues are $223,666 higher than 2020 revenues.
4
Packet Pg. 141 1
7.5.a
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 7/31/2020 7/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHERINFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
15 CRIM CONV FEE CT
16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
20 CRIM CONV FEE CN
21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT
23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
MISCELLANEOUS:
26 INVESTMENT INTEREST
27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
29 SP ACETACILIT IES RENTALS
30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
31 LEASESLONG-TERM
32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
33 PARKSDONATIONS
34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
40 POLICE JUDGMENTSIRESTITUTION
41 CASHIERS OVERAGES✓SHORTAGES
42 OTHER MISC REVENUES
43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
45 NSF FEES - POLICE
46 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
47 NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT
48 US BANK REBATE
TRANSFERS -IN:
49 OPERATING TRANSFER -IN
50 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM FUND 018
51 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
$ 2,000 $
683 $
1,668 $
332
830/(
230,000
66,377
119,851
110,149
520/(
18,000
7,850
6,214
11,786
350/c
10,000
5,784
8,783
1,217
880/(
1,000
410
6,803
(5,803)
6800/(
1,500
701
997
503
660/(
100,000
46,015
35,562
64,438
360/(
2,000
794
250
1,750
130/(
7,000
5,713
4,189
2,811
600/(
300
126
73
227
240/(
100
34
59
41
590/(
1,500
1,477
1,098
402
730/(
25,000
13,320
9,835
15,165
390/(
2,000
1,350
1,221
779
610/(
700
327
56
644
8°/
100
37
12
88
120/(
10,000
5,639
764
9,236
80/c
800
567
215
585
270/(
1,000
536
159
841
160/(
200
82
64
136
320/(
8,000
4,668
3,475
4,525
430/(
14,000
5,225
5,184
8,816
370/(
3,000
1,439
1,191
1,809
400/(
10,100
-
-
10,100
00/(
150
-
187
(37)
1250/(
448,450
169,153
207,909
240,541
465/,
155,090
220,005
207,006
(51,916)
1330/(
9,980
9,933
4,670
5,310
470/(
3,400
4,908
5,010
(1,610)
1470/(
153,000
15,445
47,383
105,617
310/(
2,100
380
-
2,100
00/(
205,000
91,072
112,074
92,926
5501(
2,500
910
-
2,500
00/(
3,500
920
750
2,750
210/(
2,000
635
1,510
490
760/(
5,000
100
3,503
1,497
700/(
300
-
118
182
390/(
3,000
3,115
6,371
(3,371)
2120/(
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/(
2,000
1,344
102
1,898
501(
200
218
50
150
250/(
-
16
21
(21)
00/c
5,000
7,667
4,822
178
960/(
100
23
68
32
680/(
100
-
30
70
300/(
-
-
30
(30)
00/c
150
142
-
150
00/(
-
30
-
-
00/(
8,500
5,754
7,079
1,421
830/(
562,920
362,617
400,597
162,323
710%
238,667
- 28,445 210,222
120/(
123,581
- 123,581 -
1000/(
26,300
17,900 13,150 13,150
5001(
388,548
17,900 165,176 223,372
430%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 42,450,777 $ 22,424,193 $ 25,583,320 $ 16,867,457 600%
F
O
CL
cC
U
C
M
C
IL
t
C
O
N
O
N
A
O
C.
d
C
C
iL
21
s
C
O
N
O
N
A
0
C
d
z
tt
to
a
5
Packet Pg. 142
I 7.5.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 17,545,152
$ 9,655,562
$ 9,886,954
$ 7,658,198
56
2 OVERTIME
491,580
317,591
352,609
138,971
72
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
281,329
2,031
3,558
277,771
1
4 BENEFITS
6,780,322
3,679,920
3,695,644
3,084,678
55
5 UNIFORMS
89,151
61,094
42,751
46,400
48
6 SUPPLIES
401,115
265,250
238,730
162,385
60
7 FUEL CONSUMED
-
-
125
(125)
0
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
108,603
108,434
91,741
16,862
84
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,037,824
7,249,193
7,386,112
7,651,712
49
10 COMMUNICATIONS
160,995
86,140
105,171
55,824
65
11 TRAVEL
68,760
5,065
15,729
53,031
23
12 EXCISE TAXES
6,500
7,085
13,189
(6,689)
203
13 RENTAL/LEASE
1,574,465
1,054,994
983,252
691,213
56
14 INSURANCE
403,973
393,746
405,121
(1,148)
100
15 UTILITIES
536,762
277,653
305,613
231,149
57
16 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
917,742
346,865
301,053
616,689
33
17 MISCELLANEOUS
507,715
239,717
273,974
233,741
54
18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
50,000
75,000
50,000
-
100
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
932,880
449,033
234,945
697,935
25
20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
9,053
-
23,120
0
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
54,530
-
54,530
0
22 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
-
-
500
0
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
5,700
69,285
60,087
(54,387)
1054
45,978,718
24,352,711
24,346,357
$
21,632,361
53
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009)
24 BENEFITS
$ 206,650 $
94,966
$ 105,903
$
100,747
51
25 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
51,424
71,025
181,965
28
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
5,793
17,000
(10,000)
243
27 MISCELLANEOUS
500
-
-
500
0
467,140
152,182
193,928
273,212
42
HISTORIC PRESSERVATION GIFT FUND (014)
28 SUPPLIES
$ 100 $
-
$
$
100
0
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
-
200
0
30 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
-
5,600
0
5,900
-
5,900
0
BUILDING MAINTENANCEFUND (016)
31 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
$ 210,222 $
-
$
$
210,222
0
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND (017)
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
20,000
$
- $
16,149
$
3,851
81
20,000
-
16,149
3,851
81
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
33 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $
123,581
$
- $
123,581
$
-
100
123,581
-
123,581
100
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSEFUND (019)
34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $
28,445
$
- $
28,445
$
-
100
28,445
-
28,445
-
100
DRUG ENFORCEIVIINTFUND (104)
35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
45,000
$
- $
-
$
45,000
0
36 REPAIR/MAINT
800
-
800
0
37 MISCELLANEOUS
-
25,966
-
0
45,800
25,966
45,800
0
F
O
C.
!Y
C
C
IL
s
C
O
N
0
N
7
O
C.
O
C
M
C
iL
t
r
C
O
r
N
0
N
7
r
C
d
E
z
0
M
r�
a
6
Packet Pg. 143
I 7.5.a I
Page 2 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
STREETFUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 728,690
$ 380,143
$ 435,405
$ 293,285
60
2 OVERTIME
18,400
25,889
26,589
(8,189)
145
3 BENEFITS
381,336
185,729
213,572
167,764
56
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,781
5,432
568
91
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
115,523
105,334
157,666
40
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
684
3,565
16,435
18
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23,210
1,670
7,396
15,814
32
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
4,834
3,988
512
89
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
10 RENTAL/LEASE
247,270
133,466
143,256
104,014
58
11 INSURANCE
148,436
156,937
148,533
(97)
100
12 UTILITIES
280,918
152,183
141,461
139,457
50
13 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
52,000
48,462
10,793
41,207
21
14 MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
2,841
11,421
(3,421)
143
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
75,658
-
-
0
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,220
-
-
4,220
0
17 INTEREST
450
255
220
230
49
COMBINED STREETCONSTIIMPROVE(112)
18 BENEFIT S
19 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
20 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
21 MISCELLANEOUS
22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
23 LAND
24 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
27 SUPPLIES
28 SMALL EQUIPMENT
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
30 TRAVEL
31 RENTAL/LEASE
32 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
33 MISCELLANEOUS
HOTEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
34 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
35 MISCELLANEOUS
36 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
37 SUPPLIES
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
39 MISCELLANEOUS
TO URISM PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123)
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 2,187,430 $
1,288,056 $
1,256,963 $
930,467
57
$ - $
1,305 $
- $
-
0
1,581,847
118,321
630,663
951,184
40
103,670
258,704
14,236
89,434
14
-
8
-
0
114,950
40,121
39,925
75,025
35
33,000
-
(842)
33,842
-3
955,000
262,036
549,545
405,455
58
72,220
72,201
72,201
19
100
1,610
1,952
1,591
19
99
$ 2,862,297 $
754,649 $
1,307,320 $
1,554,977
46
$ 4,700 $
102 $
265 $
4,435
6
1,700
116
-
1,700
0
221,500
13,714
19,862
201,638
9
80
-
-
80
0
2,000
-
2,000
0
300
-
-
300
0
6,600
1,461
2,191
4,409
33
$ 236,880 $
15,394 $
22,318 $
214,562
9
$ 83,150 $ 30,058 $ 30,289 $ 52,861 36
- 500 - - 0
4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 50
$ 87,150 $ 32,558 $ 32,289 $ 54,861 37
$ 1,790 $ - $ $ 1,790 0
25,090 - 25,090 0
$ 26,880 $ $ $ 26,880 0
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ $ 3,000 0
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ $ 3,000 0
$ 29,900 $ 3,509 $ $ 29,900 0
$ 29,900 $ 3,509 $ $ 29,900 0
a
7
Packet Pg. 144
I 7.5.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 121,000
$ 13,815
$ 36,880
$ 84,120
30
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
195,626
177,373
86,569
109,057
44
3 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
105,000
283,912
72,284
32,716
69
4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
190
-
-
190
0
5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,179,482
398,035
50,288
1,129,194
4
$ 1,601,298
$ 873,135
$ 246,022
$ 1,355,276
15
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126)
6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
11 INTEREST
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
12 SUPPLIES
13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14 MISCELLANEOUS
15 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
CEMETERY MAINTENANC E/IMPRO VEMENT (130)
16 SALARIES AND WAGES
17 OVERTIME
18 BENEFIT S
19 UNIFORMS
20 SUPPLIES
21 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
22 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23 COMMUNICATIONS
24 TRAVEL
25 RENTAL/LEASE
26 UTILITIES
27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
28 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUSTFUND (136)
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CKMIEIERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
30 SMALL EQUIPMENT
31 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
32 SUPPLIES
33 TRAVEL
34 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENTDISTRICTFUND (140)
35 SUPPLIES
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
37 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS CARES FUN (142)
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
39 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
40 INTEREST
$ 573,234 $
514,375 $
231,419 $
341,815
40
97,050
211,135
51,435
45,615
53
138,910
12,963
11,863
127,048
9
983,137
289,234
272,726
710,411
28
144,530
-
-
144,530
0
117,050
1,484
1,282
115,768
1
$ 2,053,911 $
1,029,190 $
568,724 $
1,485,187
28
$ 67,500 $
25,978 $ 19,729 $
47,771
29
6,500
- -
6,500
0
600
168 -
600
0
26,300
17,900 13,150
13,150
50
$ 100,900 $
44,045 $ 32,879 $
68,021
33
$ 95,824 $
50,413 $
57,696 $
38,128
60
3,500
176
302
3,198
9
40,472
22,119
23,304
17,168
58
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
7,000
580
1,355
5,645
19
20,000
9,478
18,724
1,276
94
4,200
-
800
3,400
19
1,700
980
982
718
58
500
-
-
500
0
16,650
4,801
9,713
6,938
58
5,652
2,339
2,687
2,965
48
500
-
-
500
0
4,000
2,325
2,567
1,433
64
$ 200,998 $
93,211 $
118,129 $
82,869
59
$ 50,000 $ - $ $ 50,000 0
$ 50,000 $ - $ $ 50,000 0
$ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0
- - 19,211 (19,211) 0
$ 25,000 $ - $ 19,211 $ 5,789 77
$ 1,500 $ 11 $ $ 1,500 0
4,500 4,500 0
5,900 5,900 0
$ 11,900 $ 11 $ $ 11,900 0
$ 2,050 $
9,451 $
394 $
1,656 19
70,035
24,697
28,529
41,506 41
4,255
425
1,221
3,034 29
76,340
34,573
30,144
46,196 39
$ 5,946,550 $ 157,111 $ $ 5,946,550 0
5,946,550 157,111 5,946,550 0
$ 677,990 $ - $ - $ 677,990 0
81,710 47,291 40,853 40,857 50
$ 759,700 $ 47,291 $ 40,853 $ 718,847 5
F
O
1z
O
!Y
2
U
C
M
C
IL
s
C
O
N
O
N
7
O
Q
d
C
M
C
iL
21
z
C
O
r
N
O
N
21
7
r
C
d
E
z
tt
M
r�
a
8
Packet Pg. 145
I 7.5.a I
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 113,453
$ 231,008
$ 132,730
$ (19,277)
117
2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
44,000
-
-
44,000
0
3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,395,037
460,676
111,039
5,283,998
2
$ 5,552,490
$ 691,684
$ 243,769
$ 5,308,721
4
WATER FUND (421)
4 SALARIES AND WAGES
5 OVERTIME
6 BENEFIT S
7 UNIFORMS
8 SUPPLIES
9 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
10 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
11 SMALL EQUIPMENT
12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13 COMMUNICATIONS
14 TRAVEL
15 EXCISE TAXES
16 RENTAL/LEASE
17 INSURANCE
18 UTILITIES
19 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
20 MISCELLANEOUS
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
24 REVENUE BONDS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
STORM FUND (422)
27 SALARIES AND WAGES
28 OVERTIME
29 BENEFIT S
30 UNIFORMS
31 SUPPLIES
32 SMALL EQUIPMENT
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34 COMMUNICATIONS
35 TRAVEL
36 EXCISE TAXES
37 RENTAL/LEASE
38 INSURANCE
39 UTILITES
40 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
41 MISCELLANEOUS
42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
43 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
44 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
45 REVENUE BONDS
46 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
47 INTEREST
$ 793,475 $
467,789 $
383,026 $
410,449
48
24,000
11,187
12,623
11,377
53
328,865
188,758
165,487
163,378
50
4,000
2,731
3,222
778
81
150,000
60,726
50,352
99,648
34
2,170,000
983,278
828,238
1,341,762
38
170,000
113,257
116,024
53,976
68
11,000
5,197
3,917
7,083
36
1,558,701
738,738
1,225,335
333,366
79
30,000
16,836
16,898
13,102
56
200
-
-
200
0
1,649,700
837,751
773,963
875,737
47
124,630
76,062
74,497
50,133
60
97,844
52,541
98,196
(352)
100
35,775
16,276
16,590
19,185
46
258,130
19,090
18,537
239,593
7
123,600
81,095
103,151
20,449
83
644,130
204,067
198,136
445,994
31
1,976,050
2,240,953
7,513
1,968,537
0
2,840
-
-
2,840
0
385,100
-
-
385,100
0
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
100
196,170
105,907
98,336
97,834
50
$ 10,760,050 $
6,248,077 $
4,219,882 $
6,540,168
39
$ 723,700 $
353,891 $
403,768 $
319,932
56
6,000
8,878
15,739
(9,739)
262
318,735
165,611
175,860
142,875
55
6,500
5,501
5,049
1,451
78
46,000
15,921
22,824
23,176
50
4,000
1,629
304
3,696
8
2,728,016
1,142,888
961,163
1,766,853
35
3,200
3,709
3,591
(391)
112
4,300
-
150
4,150
3
470,100
320,288
348,881
121,219
74
267,778
158,965
154,076
113,702
58
66,216
116,576
66,228
(12)
100
11,025
7,245
8,292
2,733
75
64,130
13,181
19,629
44,501
31
255,300
94,241
147,195
108,105
58
281,810
78,897
76,327
205,483
27
1,581,000
2,114,507
100,618
1,480,382
6
103,340
-
-
103,340
0
188,240
-
-
188,240
0
53,590
53,576
53,576
14
100
110,910
60,769
58,672
52,238
53
$ 7,293,890 $
4,716,272 $
2,621,939 $
4,671,951
36
a
9
Packet Pg. 146
I 7.5.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EBMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 2,027,508
$ 1,120,777
$ 1,022,074
$ 1,005,434
50
2 OVERTIME
95,000
57,910
75,744
19,256
80
3 BENEFITS
871,564
481,363
452,348
419,216
52
4 UNIFORMS
8,500
7,039
8,291
209
98
5 SUPPLIES
404,000
201,275
231,036
172,964
57
6 FUEL CONSUMED
30,000
12,201
52,818
(22,818)
176
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
0
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
20,161
79,889
(44,889)
228
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,141,848
1,429,305
3,053,848
(912,000)
143
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
24,136
24,126
18,875
56
11 TRAVEL
5,000
-
1,919
3,081
38
12 EXCISE TAXES
968,000
538,967
642,628
325,372
66
13 RENTAL/LEASE
329,898
192,937
216,261
113,637
66
14 INSURANCE
160,967
174,140
162,851
(1,884)
101
15 UTILITIES
1,979,985
544,625
739,572
1,240,413
37
16 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE
520,630
135,168
240,953
279,677
46
17 MISCELLANEOUS
129,350
51,699
78,431
50,919
61
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10,180,936
76,610
1,953,015
8,227,921
19
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
445,070
-
-
0
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
19,756,808
629,438
5,292,686
14,464,122
27
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
157,060
-
-
157,060
0
22 REVENUE BONDS
86,670
-
-
86,670
0
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
173,900
158,325
158,667
15,233
91
24 INTEREST
382,660
33,421
199,266
183,394
52
25 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
-
-
1,518
(1,518)
0
26 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
2,399
2,252
(2,252)
0
$ 40,492,284
$ 6,336,967
$ 14,690,197
$ 25,802,087
36
BOND RESERVEFUND (424)
27 REVENUE BONDS $ 785,020 $ - $ - $ 785,020 0
28 INTEREST 1,200,850 616,542 600,417 600,433 50
$ 1,985,870 $ 616,542 $ 600,417 $ 1,385,453 30
F
O
CL
O
lY
C
C
M
s
C
O
N
O
N
O
Q.
d
w
C
M
C
IL
z
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t,1
c0
a
io
Packet Pg. 147
I 7.5.a I
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQUIPMENTRENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 272,384
$ 158,781
$ 159,491
$ 112,893
59
2 OVERTIME
2,000
824
1,573
427
79
3 BENEFITS
116,481
66,096
66,538
49,943
57
4 UNIFORMS
1,000
828
1,056
(56)
106
5 SUPPLIES
120,000
44,425
41,279
78,721
34
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
258,000
79,367
110,454
147,546
43
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
1,054
5,979
52,021
10
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
2,577
776
45,974
2
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
1,362
1,316
1,684
44
11 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0
12 RENTAL/LEASE
12,790
7,144
7,204
5,586
56
13 INSURANCE
40,910
40,270
39,334
1,576
96
14 UTILITIES
14,500
9,516
10,232
4,268
71
15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
60,000
27,858
23,974
36,026
40
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
7,754
8,365
3,635
70
17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
410,139
134,751
322,273
87,866
79
$ 1,429,954
$ 582,608
$ 799,843
$ 630,111
56
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
379,162
$
165,004
$
178,504
$
200,658
47
19 OVERTIME
2,000
-
1,987
13
99
20 BENEFITS
127,657
55,811
61,553
66,104
48
21 SUPPLIES
5,000
1,491
3,089
1,911
62
22 SMALL EQUIPMENT
141,300
59,070
18,305
122,995
13
23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
171,460
50,098
22,224
149,236
13
24 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
40,479
43,855
14,915
75
25 TRAVEL
1,500
207
-
1,500
0
26 RENTAL/LEASE
7,400
5,400
5,348
2,052
72
27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
302,660
224,196
236,516
66,144
78
28 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
11,221
1,205
3,795
24
29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
56,000
-
-
56,000
0
$
1,257,909
$
612,976
$
572,585
$
685,324
46
FIR]IVIEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
31 BENEFITS
$
24,560
$
12,834
$
15,483
$
9,077
63
32 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
70,407
37,452
36,149
34,258
51
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,200
1,007
11,500
(10,300)
958
$
96,167
$
51,294
$
63,132
$
33,035
66
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
132,008,554
$
48,760,462
$
52,195,076
$
79,813,478
40
a
11
Packet Pg. 148
7.5.a
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2021 Amended 7/31/2020 7/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY CLERK
FINANCE
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPART MENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PARKS& RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
Title
$ 432,478
$ 186,441
$ 192,621
$ 239,857
45%
345,501
196,288
194,309
151,192
56%
837,176
378,306
419,004
418,172
50%
1,166,183
595,161
622,191
543,992
53%
757,055
438,669
363,075
393,980
48%
1,118,378
879,925
766,314
352,064
69%
C
936,480
503,028
492,368
444,112
53%
Q-
4)
w
12,881,593
7,237,544
7,203,386
5,678,207
56%
12,217,071
6,748,449
6,626,850
5,590,221
54%
624,198
309,288
308,903
315,295
49%
LL
3,585,738
1,608,527
1,730,845
1,854,893
48%
2'
t
599,402
-
31,912
567,490
5%
r
G
4,729,281
2,047,976
2,366,948
2,362,333
50%
2
3,305,285
1,849,822
1,857,140
1,448,145
56%
T_
o
N
2,442,899
1,373,287
1,170,492
1,272,407
48%
>+
7
$ 45,978,718
$ 24,352,711
$ 24,346,357
$ 21,632,361
53%
O
C.
O
lY
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
a
c
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND
IN SUMMARY
jL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
z
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
C
WATER UTILITY FUND
$ 10,760,050 $
6,248,077 $
4,219,882 $
6,540,168
n
39%
r
STORM UTILITY FUND
7,293,890
4,716,272
2,621,939
4,671,951
36%
cm
N
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
40,492,284
6,336,967
14,690,197
25,802,087
36%21
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
30%
$ 60,532,094 $
17,917,858 $
22,132,435 $
38,399,659
37%
d
E
z
tt
to
a
12
Packet Pg. 149
I 7.5.a I
Page I of 4
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
7/31/2020
Expenditures
7/31/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES
$
199,052
$
110,672
$
116,857
$
82,195
59%
OVERTIME
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
BENEFITS
118,713
57,333
60,816
57,897
51%
SUPPLIES
2,000
1,502
549
1,451
27%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
-
1,159
(1,159)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
62,160
3,377
-
62,160
0%
COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
5,094
5,624
(2,624)
187%
TRAVEL
6,700
587
-
6,700
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
12,368
7,184
7,182
5,186
58%
REPAIRS✓MAINTENANCE
500
645
-
500
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
26,985
48
435
26,550
2%
$
432,478
$
186,441
$
192,621
$
239,857
45%
OFFICEOFMAYOR
SALARIES
$
229,512
$
130,749
$
133,872
$
95,640
58%
BENEFITS
85,243
49,891
48,767
36,476
57%
SUPPLIES
1,500
660
293
1,207
20%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
4,199
65
(65)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,000
420
257
2,743
9%
COMMUNICATION
1,400
749
915
485
65%
TRAVEL
3,000
153
-
3,000
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
17,396
9,253
9,523
7,873
55%
MISCELLANEOUS
4,450
213
617
3,833
14%
$
345,501
$
196,288
$
194,309
$
151,192
56%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES
$
387,048
$
212,172
$
224,361
$
162,687
58%
OVERTIME
-
1,619
911
(911)
0%
BENEFITS
154,430
84,212
85,669
68,761
55%
SUPPLIES
13,300
3,334
958
12,342
7%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
300
893
198
102
66%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
205,000
28,951
60,735
144,265
30%
COMMUNICATIONS
1,550
837
808
742
52%
TRAVEL
1,500
500
-
1,500
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
36,102
17,836
19,583
16,519
54%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
8,380
7,832
8,067
313
96%
MISCELLANEOUS
29,566
20,120
17,714
11,852
60%
$
837,176
$
378,306
$
419,004
$
418,172
50%
MUNIC IPAL C O URT
SALARIES
$
651,167
$
366,056
$
376,353
$
274,814
58%
OVERTIME
800
90
16,304
(15,504)
2038%
BENEFITS
243,859
136,729
130,742
113,117
54%
SUPPLIES
10,600
3,159
3,250
7,350
31%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
2,788
-
1,000
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124,925
34,591
37,736
87,189
30%
COMMUNICATIONS
3,550
1,366
2,591
959
73%
TRAVEL
6,500
37
1,035
5,465
16%
RENTAL/LEASE
70,682
39,822
41,168
29,514
58%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
4,880
645
-
4,880
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
25,100
9,880
13,012
12,088
52%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
23,120
0%
$
1,166,183
$
595,161
$
622,191
$
543,992
53%
F
O
CL
O
2
U
C
M
C
IL
21
t
C
O
2
N
O
N
A
0
O
C.
<0
C
C
iL
s
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
A
7
C
d
1=
z
t)
to
r�
a
13
Packet Pg. 150 1
I 7.5.a I
Page 2 of 4
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 397,226
$ 238,553
$ 166,661
$ 230,565
42%
BENEFITS
169,669
96,005
67,480
102,189
40%
SUPPLIES
7,000
2,598
1,306
5,694
19%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
1,003
-
-
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34,200
16,459
23,198
11,002
68%
COMMUNICATIONS
33,000
8,364
26,096
6,904
79%
TRAVEL
1,980
6
-
1,980
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
55,980
30,050
27,816
28,164
50%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
48,000
41,791
47,028
972
98%
MISCELLANEOUS
10,000
3,840
3,490
6,510
35%
$ 757,055
$ 438,669
$ 363,075
$ 393,980
48%
FINANCE
SALARIES
$
743,908
$
631,257
$
509,270
$
234,638
68%
OVERTIME
4,500
-
-
4,500
0%
BENEFITS
240,564
164,445
165,579
74,985
69%
SUPPLIES
7,350
2,744
2,050
5,300
28%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,650
-
557
2,093
21%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,300
74
458
8,842
5%
COMMUNICATIONS
2,000
496
506
1,494
25%
TRAVEL
3,100
-
-
3,100
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
55,176
34,341
35,576
19,600
64%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
41,480
43,963
45,545
(4,065)
110%
MISCELLANEOUS
8,350
2,606
6,772
1,578
81%
$
1,118,378
$
879,925
$
766,314
$
352,064
69%
CITY ATPO RNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
936,480
$
503,028
$
492,368
$
444,112
53%
$
936,480
$
503,028
$
492,368
$
444,112
53%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT
50,000
335
26,878
23,122
54%
SUPPLIES
5,000
3,818
1,152
3,848
23%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,168,050
6,146,949
6,325,957
4,842,093
57%
EXCISE TAXES
6,500
7,085
13,189
(6,689)
203%
RENTAL/LEASE
6,366
9,320
2,467
3,899
39%
INSURANCE
403,973
393,746
405,121
(1,148)
100%
MISCELLANEOUS
96,344
82,974
83,590
12,754
87%
CONTRIBUTION TO ECA
50,000
75,000
50,000
-
100%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
932,880
449,033
234,945
697,935
25%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
54,530
-
-
54,530
0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT
5,700
69,285
60,087
(54,387)
1054%
FISCAL AGENT FEES
500
-
-
500
0%
$
12,881,593
$
7,237,544
$
7,203,386
$
5,678,207
56%
F
O
CL
O
2
U
C
M
C
M
21
t
C
O
2
N
O
N
7
O
Q.
Qf
U
C
M
C
IL
s
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
z
tt
to
r�
r�
a
14
Packet Pg. 151
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DEIAIL
2021 Amended
7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
POLICE SERVICES
SALARIES
$ 7,406,813
$ 4,033,337
$ 4,093,204
$ 3,313,609
55%
OVERTIME
461,280
294,437
320,353
140,927
69%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK
281,329
2,031
3,558
277,771
1%
BENEFITS
2,900,495
1,586,095
1,533,932
1,366,563
53%
UNIFORMS
78,926
44,762
36,775
42,151
47%
SUPPLIES
90,500
55,758
63,746
26,754
70%
FUEL CONSUMED
-
-
125
(125)
0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
78,953
88,308
61,870
17,083
78%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
126,220
114,724
62,001
64,219
49%
COMMUNICATIONS
36,000
24,850
27,416
8,584
76%
TRAVEL
29,310
2,393
14,694
14,616
50%
0
CL
RENTAL/LEASE
651,715
477,821
377,158
274,557
58%
�
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
15,180
2,461
3,398
11,782
22%
w
MISCELLANEOUS
60,350
21,473
28,622
31,728
47%
2
$
12,217,071
$
6,748,449
$
6,626,850
$
5,590,221
54%
COMMUNITY S ERVIC ES /EC O N DEV.
C
SALARIES
$
312,977
$
182,741
$
172,390
$
140,587
55%
LL
OVERTIME
-
-
-
-
0%
%
BENEFITS
91,455
53,193
52,439
39,016
57%
r
SUPPLIES
2,275
6,826
509
1,766
22%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
800
3,321
-
800
0%
2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
170,400
50,396
64,194
106,206
38%
N
COMMUNICATIONS
3,175
1,138
1,463
1,712
46%
O
TRAVEL
2,000
1,020
-
2,000
0%
N
RENTAL/LEASE
21,116
6,877
11,332
9,784
54%
7
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
10,500
-
-
10,500
0%
v
MISCELLANEOUS
9,500
3,777
6,577
2,923
69%
�+
$
624,198
$
309,288
$
308,903
$
315,295
49%
O
DEVELO PMINT SERVIC ES/PLANNING
C'
d
SALARIES
$
1,846,548
$
999,003
$
1,076,340
$
770,208
58%
W
OVERTIME
1,300
13,173
504
796
39%
ea
BENEFITS
684,621
364,200
373,058
311,563
54%
C
UNIFORMS
500
-
-
500
0%
C
SUPPLIES
12,100
4,754
3,168
8,932
26%
LL
SMALL EQUIPMENT
7,300
1,905
1,336
5,964
18%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
825,499
93,550
144,446
681,053
17%
s
COMMUNICATIONS
9,000
6,516
8,849
151
98%
C
TRAVEL
7,300
228
-
7,300
0%
0
RENTAL/LEASE
135,710
99,114
77,290
58,420
57%
r
REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
6,800
-
643
6,157
9%
G
MISCELLANEOUS
49,060
26,083
45,212
3,848
92%
N
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
-
-
-
0%
$
3,585,738
$
1,608,527
$
1,730,845
$
1,854,893
48%
ENGINEERING
r
SALARIES
$
1,786,020
$
1,014,466
$
1,025,474
$
760,546
57%
d
OVERTIME
5,000
2,668
2,269
2,731
45%
E
BENEFITS
735,787
409,177
408,543
327,244
56%
z
t)
UNIFORMS
450
256
-
450
0%
43
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,200
868
795
1,405
36%
r�
Q
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13,840
1,530
-
13,840
0%
COMMUNICATIONS
19,600
9,746
10,374
9,226
53%
TRAVEL
600
92
-
600
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
146,935
77,012
83,497
63,438
57%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
2,600
458
68
2,532
3%
MISCELLANEOUS
80,000
34,816
29,018
50,983
36%
$
2,793,032
$
1,551,091
$
1,560,038
$
1,232,994
56%
15
Packet Pg. 152
I 7.5.a I
Page 4 of 4
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2021 Amended 7/31/2020
7/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
% Spent
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES
$ 79,510 $ -
$ 25,149 $
54,361
32%
OVERTIME
- -
581
(581)
0%
BENEFITS
18,392 -
5,780
12,612
31%
SUPPLIES
1,000 -
-
1,000
0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
500 -
-
500
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
500,000 -
-
500,000
0%
COMMUNICATIONS
- -
402
(402)
0%
599,402 -
31,912
567,490
5%
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES
$
2,319,689
$
1,107,408
$
1,336,121
$
983,568
58%
OVERTIME
10,000
2,179
6,714
3,286
67%
BENEFITS
822,471
420,958
480,880
341,591
58%
UNIFORMS
6,275
2,722
2,383
3,892
38%
SUPPLIES
127,890
95,331
92,480
35,410
72%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
10,900
4,068
18,050
(7,150)
166%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
785,550
96,189
140,921
644,629
18%
COMMUNICATIONS
31,370
13,235
6,560
24,810
21%
TRAVEL
5,270
50
-
5,270
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
251,549
160,624
128,214
123,335
51%
PUBLICUTILITY
230,507
88,437
118,392
112,115
51%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
29,700
16,593
-
29,700
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
98,110
31,128
36,232
61,878
37%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
9,053
0%
$
4,729,281
$
2,047,976
$
2,366,948
$
2,362,333
50%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINIS TRATIO N
SALARIES
$
299,962
$
174,615
$
175,970
$
123,992
59%
OVERTIME
200
-
-
200
0%
BENEFITS
106,903
61,668
61,687
45,216
58%
SUPPLIES
8,600
2,749
1,879
6,721
22%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
264
5,502
(4,502)
550%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
98
159
41
80%
COMMUNICATIONS
1,350
449
467
883
35%
TRAVEL
500
-
-
500
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
84,320
56,023
48,416
35,904
57%
PUBLICUTILITY
3,318
1,907
2,094
1,224
63%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
4,900
959
928
3,972
19%
$
512,253
$
298,731
$
297,102
$
215,151
58%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES
783,970
454,532
454,934
329,036
58%
OVERTIME
7,500
3,423
4,974
2,526
66%
BENEFIT S
357,720
195,680
193,395
164,325
54%
UNIFORMS
3,000
13,353
3,593
(593)
120%
SUPPLIES
112,000
82,017
67,389
44,611
60%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
3,000
818
2,208
792
74%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
73,000
158,858
33,683
39,317
46%
COMMUNICATIONS
16,000
13,301
13,101
2,899
82%
TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
29,050
29,715
14,029
15,021
48%
PUBLICUTILITY
302,937
187,309
185,127
117,810
61%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
748,722
232,478
196,304
552,418
26%
MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
1,802
1,755
3,245
35%
$
2,442,899
$
1,373,287
$
1,170,492
$
1,272,407
48%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$
45,978,718
$
24,352,711
$
24,346,357
$
21,632,361
53%
r�
a
16
Packet Pg. 153
7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 2,287,290
$ 2,287,290
$ 2,740,276
19.80%
February
4,613,781
2,326,491
5,089,278
10.31%
March
7,107,230
2,493,449
7,050,949
-0.79%
April
10,175,039
3,067,809
11,029,475
8.40%
May
18,374,709
8,199,670
20,122,774
9.51%
June
20,786,286
2,411,577
22,872,014
10.03%
July
23,079,988
2,293,702
25,583,320
10.85%
August
25,616,155
2,536,167
September
27,881,561
2,265,406
October
31,748,856
3,867,296
November
40,108,232
8,359,375
December
42,450,777
2,342,545
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2021
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
195,748 $
195,748
$ 625,840
219.72%
February
341,557
145,810
922,678
170.14%
March
525,343
183,786
1,222,093
132.63%
April
697,989
172,646
1,478,072
111.76%
May
895,413
197,424
1,949,651
117.74%
June
1,120,061
224,648
2,330,065
108.03%
July
1,335,075
215,015
2,879,064
115.65%
August
1,581,214
246,138
September
1,849,736
268,522
October
2,083,774
234,038
November
2,308,787
225,013
December
2,500,000
191,213
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
17
Packet Pg. 154
I 7.5.a I
SALES TAX SUMMARY
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: July 2021
Year -to -Date
Automotive Repair, Total $5,699,002
$114,194
Health &
Personal Care, Amusement &
Construction Trade,
$151349 Recreation, $29,519
$833,502 Business Services, Gasoline, $22,717
Accodation, $591,808
$14,375 Retail Food Stores,
$194,987
Clothing and
Accessories,$185,019 Retail Automotive,
Communications, '
Misc Retail, � $1,417,461
$143,397 $1,062,086
Wholesale Trade,
$214,032
Others, $129,017
Manufacturing, $71,597
Eating & Drinking,
$523,943
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
10,000,000
$8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046
8,000,000 7 395 114
$6,741,838 $6,905,122
6,000,000 $5,699,002
4,000,000
2,000, 000
0
201 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
F
0
a
U
c
c
ii
t
c
0
N
0
N
0
a
U
c
c
ii
21
z
c
0
r
N
O
N
7
c
a)
t
v
ns
a
18
Packet Pg. 155
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2021
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
661,963 $
661,963
$ 774,198
16.95%
February
1,491,081
829,118
1,647,058
10.46%
March
2,110,825
619,744
2,350,659
11.36%
April
2,677,870
567,045
3,041,781
13.59%
May
3,379,279
701,409
3,922,140
16.06%
June
4,038,220
658,941
4,797,214
18.80%
July
4,756,025
717,805
5,699,002
19.83%
August
5,547,915
791,890
September
6,288,480
740,565
October
7,063,515
775,035
November
7,866,501
802,986
December
8,600,000
733,499
Gas Utility Tax
Sales and Use Tax
9,000,000
8,000,000y
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--ft- Current Year Budget Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 82,557 $
82,557
$ 84,132
1.91%
February
170,654
88,097
172,999
1.37%
March
250,947
80,292
269,171
7.26%
April
317,447
66,501
350,366
10.37%
May
368,586
51,139
413,190
12.10%
June
403,108
34,522
453,419
12.48%
July
430,884
27,777
489,128
13.52%
August
454,299
23,415
September
475,121
20,822
October
498,594
23,472
November
537,295
38,702
December
595,000
57,705
Gas Utility Tax
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
19
Packet Pg. 156
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2021
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 69,351 $
69,351
$ 56,592
-18.40%
February
138,426
69,074
85,370
-38.33%
March
199,085
60,660
140,907
-29.22%
April
265,909
66,823
190,824
-28.24%
May
325,636
59,728
218,932
-32.77%
June
385,177
59,540
274,873
-28.64%
July
443,946
58,770
322,813
-27.29%
August
501,501
57,554
September
557,882
56,382
October
615,320
57,437
November
665,999
50,679
December
723,000
57,001
Electric Utility Tax
800,000
Telephone Utility Tax
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
/
200,000
100,000
0
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 179,984 $
179,984
$ 192,356
6.87%
February
379,889
199,905
367,328
-3.31%
March
546,637
166,748
537,433
-1.68%
April
730,293
183,656
721,208
-1.24%
May
873,813
143,520
872,875
-0.11%
June
997,568
123,755
987,183
-1.04%
July
1,114,337
116,769
1,105,355
-0.81%
August
1,230,154
115,816
September
1,342,671
112,517
October
1,453,976
111,305
November
1,576,729
122,753
December
1,710,000
133,271
Electric Utility Tax
1,800,000
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000 ,
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0- Current Year Budget - Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
20
Packet Pg. 157
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2021
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 779,311 $
779,311
$ 785,708
0.82%
February
1,323,513
544,201
1,376,327
3.99%
March
2,123,378
799,865
2,200,360
3.63%
April
2,634,733
511,355
2,730,111
3.62%
May
3,397,533
762,799
3,527,366
3.82%
June
3,993,888
596,356
4,181,353
4.69%
July
4,928,107
934,219
5,161,097
4.73%
August
5,728,520
800,414
September
6,831,863
1,103,343
October
7,628,547
796,684
November
8,538,589
910,042
December
9,090,825
552,236
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2021
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 384,276 $
384,276
$ 377,845
6.87%
February
1,216,009
831,732
1,205,144
-3.31%
March
1,599,504
383,495
1,586,561
-1.68%
April
1,939,303
339,799
1,926,094
-1.24%
May
2,323,204
383,901
2,307,849
-0.11%
June
2,663,931
340,727
2,647,822
-1.04%
July
3,048,086
384,154
2,994,340
-1.76%
August
3,880,066
831,980
September
4,263,771
383,706
October
4,604,458
340,687
November
4,988,465
384,006
December
5,316,477
328,012
Storm Water Sales
5,500,000
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000 -
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--6-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
C�
a
21
Packet Pg. 158
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2021
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 846,742 $
846,742
$ 806,699
-4.73%
February
1,539,036
692,295
1,482,613
-3.67%
March
2,387,119
848,083
2,293,552
-3.92%
April
3,078,705
691,586
2,976,527
-3.32%
May
3,923,269
844,563
3,802,264
-3.08%
June
4,616,005
692,736
4,493,851
-2.65%
July
5,485,907
869,902
5,279,791
-3.76%
August
6,180,993
695,086
September
7,065,967
884,974
October
7,769,759
703,792
November
8,630,384
860,626
December
9,319,928
689,544
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
C.
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
7
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
IL
z
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t�
co
a
22
Packet Pg. 159
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 4,845,167
$ 4,845,167
$ 4,488,492
-7.36%
February
8,240,292
3,395,126
7,637,016
-7.32%
March
11,746,201
3,505,909
11,022,804
-6.16%
April
15,231,541
3,485,340
14,232,961
-6.56%
May
18,483,451
3,251,910
17,443,966
-5.62%
June
22,684,269
4,200,818
21,115,256
-6.92%
July
26,549,767
3,865,498
24,346,357
-8.30%
August
30,224,810
3,675,044
September
33,657,349
3,432,539
October
37,442,814
3,785,464
November
41,528,072
4,085,259
December
45,978,718
4,450,646
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2021
Non -Departmental
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 2,126,439 $
2,126,439
$ 2,013,112
-5.33%
February
2,957,339
830,899
2,845,113
-3.79%
March
3,909,781
952,442
3,679,050
-5.90%
April
4,736,733
826,952
4,484,023
-5.34%
May
5,415,966
679,234
5,278,401
-2.54%
June
6,873,740
1,457,774
6,412,264
-6.71%
July
7,909,844
1,036,104
7,203,386
-8.93%
August
8,774,178
864,334
September
9,513,240
739,062
October
10,425,754
912,513
November
11,547,839
1,122,086
December
12,881,593
1,333,754
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r.+
C
O
r
N
O
N
21
7
7
r
C
d
t
C�
a
23
Packet Pg. 160
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2021
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
27,295 $
27,295 $
26,808
-1.79%
February
57,824
30,529
53,681
-7.17%
March
91,440
33,616
83,267
-8.94%
April
122,323
30,882
110,738
-9.47%
May
163,149
40,826
137,169
-15.92%
June
212,026
48,877
164,613
-22.36%
July
246,267
34,241
192,621
-21.78%
August
293,761
47,494
September
333,076
39,315
October
357,472
24,396
November
393,733
36,262
December
432,478
38,745
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2021
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
28,543 $
28,543 $
27,531
-3.55%
February
58,378
29,835
55,740
-4.52%
March
86,855
28,477
83,532
-3.83%
April
115,847
28,992
111,352
-3.88%
May
144,377
28,530
138,910
-3.79%
June
172,357
27,980
166,677
-3.30%
July
200,988
28,631
194,309
-3.32%
August
230,481
29,494
September
259,088
28,607
October
287,175
28,087
November
315,280
28,104
December
345,501
30,221
Office of Mayor
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget - -PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
iZ
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
CL
U
a
M
c
LL
21
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
!v
t
t�
a
24
Packet Pg. 161
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2021
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 73,271 $
73,271
$ 75,120
2.52%
February
138,790
65,519
132,066
-4.84%
March
202,112
63,322
187,141
-7.41%
April
262,791
60,679
252,612
-3.87%
May
326,332
63,541
319,298
-2.16%
June
403,462
77,130
368,323
-8.71%
July
464,647
61,185
419,004
-9.82%
August
528,490
63,843
September
598,547
70,057
October
664,032
65,485
November
731,681
67,649
December
837,176
105,495
Municipal Court
Human Resources
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000 dA
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 88,422 $
88,422
$ 93,953
6.26%
February
185,102
96,680
183,450
-0.89%
March
279,267
94,165
275,717
-1.27%
April
374,976
95,709
359,370
-4.16%
May
477,911
102,935
445,221
-6.84%
June
568,960
91,049
535,746
-5.84%
July
663,035
94,076
622,191
-6.16%
August
760,661
97,626
September
855,256
94,594
October
954,530
99,275
November
1,047,855
93,324
December
1,166,183
118,328
Municipal Court
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0---CurrentYeaz Budget �PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
C.
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
t
C�
a
25
Packet Pg. 162
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2021
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
41,233 $
41,233 $
43,221
4.82%
February
88,221
46,989
85,831
-2.71%
March
135,256
47,034
130,319
-3.65%
April
184,259
49,003
157,909
-14.30%
May
233,650
49,391
198,730
-14.95%
June
281,295
47,646
263,632
-6.28%
July
332,496
51,200
308,903
-7.10%
August
387,551
55,056
September
434,722
47,170
October
487,409
52,687
November
550,406
62,997
December
624,198
73,792
City Clerk
Community Services/Economic Development
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget --&- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 73,276 $
73,276
$ 78,859
7.62%
February
133,953
60,677
139,396
4.06%
March
196,194
62,241
209,183
6.62%
April
261,901
65,707
272,337
3.98%
May
322,071
60,170
328,247
1.92%
June
380,379
58,308
351,029
-7.72%
July
444,659
64,280
363,075
-18.35%
August
511,894
67,234
September
567,756
55,862
October
625,324
57,568
November
692,090
66,766
December
757,055
64,965
City Clerk
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
sZ
U
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
CIL
U
C
c
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t�
a
26
Packet Pg. 163
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2021
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 136,722 $
136,722
$ 117,002
-14.42%
February
290,515
153,792
168,294
-42.07%
March
386,224
95,709
350,229
-9.32%
April
453,827
67,604
404,389
-10.89%
May
542,997
89,170
460,963
-15.11%
June
634,330
91,333
519,736
-18.07%
July
713,918
79,588
572,585
-19.80%
August
806,613
92,695
September
902,103
95,490
October
985,360
83,257
November
1,067,005
81,645
December
1,257,909
190,904
Finance
Technology Rental Fund
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 116,793 $
116,793
$ 137,736
17.93%
February
202,688
85,896
226,074
11.54%
March
289,766
87,077
314,260
8.45%
April
377,999
88,233
402,835
6.57%
May
466,613
88,615
490,038
5.02%
June
576,420
109,807
625,371
8.49%
July
670,117
93,697
766,314
14.36%
August
756,308
86,191
September
853,460
97,152
October
943,512
90,052
November
1,030,441
86,929
December
1,118,378
87,937
Finance
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
O
C
C
LL
21
t
r
C
O
2
N
O
N
O
C.
O
C
c
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
7
r
C
d
1=
t
C�
a
27
Packet Pg. 164
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2021
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 78,040 $
78,040
$ 69,941
-10.38%
February
1S6,080
78,040
142,526
-8.68%
March
234,120
78,040
212,467
-9.25%
April
312,160
78,040
282,407
-9.53%
May
390,200
78,040
352,348
-9.70%
June
468,240
78,040
404,226
-13.67%
July
546,280
78,040
492,368
-9.87%
August
624,320
78,040
September
702,360
78,040
October
780,400
78,040
November
858,440
78,040
December
936,480
78,040
Police
City Attorney
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 948,663 $
948,663
$ 992,942
4.67%
February
1,933,831
985,168
1,856,572
-4.00%
March
2,901,114
967,283
2,871,535
-1.02%
April
3,878,067
976,953
3,802,023
-1.96%
May
4,844,411
966,345
4,751,092
-1.93%
June
5,873,421
1,029,009
5,731,600
-2.41%
July
6,905,785
1,032,364
6,626,850
-4.04%
August
7,852,686
946,901
September
8,847,063
994,377
October
9,934,749
1,087,687
November
11,184,244
1,249,495
December
12,217,071
1,032,827
Police
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
U
C
M
C
LL
21
t
r
C
O
2
N
O
N
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
LL
z
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t�
a
Z$
Packet Pg. 165
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2021
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 256,049 $
256,049
$ 219,157
-14.41%
February
537,665
281,616
448,394
-16.60%
March
818,171
280,505
690,769
-15.57%
April
1,116,880
298,709
934,573
-16.32%
May
1,419,687
302,807
1,185,423
-16.50%
June
1,698,802
279,115
1,471,283
-13.39%
July
2,000,438
301,636
1,730,845
-13.48%
August
2,308,559
308,121
September
2,606,786
298,227
October
2,898,446
291,660
November
3,237,188
338,742
December
3,585,738
348,550
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
3,600,000
3,200,000
2,800,000
2,400,000
2,000,000
1,600,000
1,200,000
800,000
400,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*-- Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 319,744 $
319,744
$ 308,283
-3.58%
February
651,727
331,983
655,977
0.65%
March
1,004,599
352,872
971,861
-3.26%
April
1,371,174
366,574
1,273,239
-7.14%
May
1,749,534
378,360
1,604,251
-8.30%
June
2,129,825
380,291
2,002,869
-5.96%
July
2,608,624
478,799
2,366,948
-9.26%
August
3,159,845
551,221
September
3,607,041
447,196
October
3,989,956
382,916
November
4,323,317
333,361
December
4,729,281
405,964
Parks & Recreation
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000 fool
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
CL
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
t
C�
a
29
Packet Pg. 166
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2021
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 42,089 $
42,089
$ 40,605
-3.53%
February
84,997
42,908
81,720
-3.86%
March
127,527
42,530
123,465
-3.19%
April
170,261
42,734
170,658
0.23%
May
213,078
42,817
212,461
-0.29%
June
256,751
43,673
254,025
-1.06%
July
300,611
43,860
297,102
-1.17%
August
343,101
42,490
September
385,406
42,305
October
426,793
41,387
November
468,729
41,936
December
512,253
43,524
Facilities Maintenance
Public Works Administration
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 167,724 $
167,724
$ 142,909
-14.80%
February
348,879
181,155
294,332
-15.63%
March
533,264
184,385
528,741
-0.85%
April
706,629
173,365
711,450
0.68%
May
894,239
187,611
856,587
-4.21%
June
1,043,804
149,565
989,625
-5.19%
July
1,223,905
180,101
1,170,492
-4.36%
August
1,414,941
191,036
September
1,622,246
207,305
October
1,898,737
276,491
November
2,125,911
227,174
December
2,442,899
316,988
Facilities Maintenance
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000 �{
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
t
C�
a
30
Packet Pg. 167
I 7.5.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2021
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 212,668 $
212,668
$ 218,316
2.66%
February
423,271
210,602
436,144
3.04%
March
652,974
229,703
661,498
1.31%
April
890,809
237,835
888,001
-0.32%
May
1,130,883
240,074
1,122,224
-0.77%
June
1,371,946
241,063
1,346,241
-1.87%
July
1,617,159
245,213
1,560,038
-3.53%
August
1,869,308
252,149
September
2,101,156
231,848
October
2,337,410
236,254
November
2,559,700
222,290
December
2,793,032
233,332
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
21000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
31
Packet Pg. 168
I 7.5.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment
Portfolio Detail
As of July 31, 2021
Years
Agency/
Investment
Purchase
to
Par
Market
Maturity
Coupon
Issuer
Type
Price
Maturity
Value
Value
Date
Rate
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
410,553
0.42
405,000
407,568
01/01/22
1.79%
FFCB
Bonds
1,998,548
0.87
2,000,000
2,031,926
06/14/22
1.88%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
1,466,077
0.92
1,345,000
1,406,023
07/01/22
5.00%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
260,748
0.92
250,000
256,193
07/01/22
2.95%
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Bonds
948,084
1.34
855,000
910,207
12/01/22
5.00%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
1,517,955
1.42
1,500,000
1,525,095
01/01/23
1.54%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
576,332
1.42
520,000
555,818
01/01/23
5.00%
Seattle WA Muni
Bonds
2,224,500
1.51
2,000,000
2,147,720
02/01/23
5.00%
FHLB
Bonds
1,996,590
2.18
2,000,000
1,997,980
10/05/23
0.22%
First Financial - ECA
CD
2,803,516
2.29
2,803,516
2,803,516
11/15/23
2.08%
Kent WA
Bonds
286,648
2.34
250,000
278,213
12/01/23
5.00%
Spokane County WA
Bonds
259,075
3.34
250,000
262,658
12/01/24
2.10%
First Financial - Waterfront Center
CD
2,000,000
6.26
2,000,000
2,000,000
11/01/27
0.25%
TOTAL SECURITIES
16,748,624
1.94
16,178,516
16,582,915
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
28,981,696
28,981,696
Demand
0.18%
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment
Pool
25,303,507
25,303,507
Demand
1.20%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
$
70,463,719 $
70,868,118
Kent WA,
Issuer Diversification Seattle
2%
WA
--'. *ti Muni,
12%
Mason &
Kitsap Cnty
Financial -
WA, 5%
CD, 30%
Grant Cnty
�
WA, 15%
FFCB, FHLB, Spokane
12% 12% CountyEnergy
WA, R®rthwest,
10%
Cash and Investment Balances Checking,
(in $ Millions) $3.4 , 5%
Bonds, �
$11.4, 15%
CD's, $4.8 ,
7% State LGIP,
$29.0, 39%
County
LGIP,
$25.3 , 34%
32
Packet Pg. 169 1
I 7.5.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,200,000 $1,236,875
$1,000,000 $947,931
$800,000 667,466
$635,781
$600,000 423,799
$400,000
$200,000
$-
�2016��20�17 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
1.5%
1.3%
1.0%
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months)
— - - 6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark) City Blended Rate
August October December February April
June
Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return
$ 6,000, 000 6.00
$ 5,000, 000 5.00
$4,000, 000 4.00
$3,000, 000 3.00
$ 2,000, 000 2.00
$1,000, 000 1.00
$- - 0.00%
0-6 Mo 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48-54 54-60 60-66 66-72 72-78
Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo
33
Packet Pg. 170
7.5.a
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
& SUBFUNDS
7/31 /2021 7/31 /2021
Q2 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
001-General Fund
$ 15,105,708 $ 8,969,825
$ 5,729,329 $ 1,236,962
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
343,249 343,249
(41,666.00) (193,928
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
1,782,149 1,782,150
- - 0
CL
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
19,688 19,689
2,500.00 2,500
016-Building Maintenance
210,221 210,221
- -
.v
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
848,617 848,616
(15,999.00) (15,999
Total General Fund & Subfunds
$ 18,309,632 $ 12,173,749
$ 5,674,164 $ 1,029,535 E
*$2,000,000 of the General Fund Balance has been assigned by management for the development of Civic Field. 21
z
c
*$7,267,031of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,768,863 balance in Fund 012, represent the required 20% 0
operating reserve. r
N
O
N
,
3
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
1=
0
0
U
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
ii
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
7/31 /2021 7/31 /2021
Q2 YTD c
Fund Balance Cash Balance
r
N
General Fund & Subfunds
$ 18,309,632 $ 12,173,749
$ 5,674,164 $ 877,509 N
Special Revenue
18,927,308 17,679,465
6,539,428 7,937,106 3
Capital Projects
6,295,430 6,103,705
5,648 141,920 r
Total Governmental Funds
$ 43,532,369 $ 35,956,920
c
$ 12,219,240 $ 8,956,535
t
r
r
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
34
Packet Pg. 171
7.5.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
GOVERNMENTAL
SPECIAL REVENUE
7/31/2021
7/31/2021
Q2
YTD
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 75,947
$ 75,559
$ 847 $
1,645
111 - Street Fund
923,988
772,582
128,731
(214,422
112 - Combined Street Const/Im prove
1,909,797
1,479,759
(339,401)
(171,867
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
687,547
682,943
8,487
4,820 0
118 - Memorial Street Tree
20,665
20,528
230
447
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
68,873
61,321
1,808
1,952
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
93,637
92,914
2,222
11,638 2
122 -Youth Scholarship Fund
14,133
14,041
157
306 a
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
93,106
90,265
6,032
12,768
125 - Real Estate Tax2
3,831,168
3,517,027
454,119
,E
1,259,186 U,
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1
3,237,558
2,920,311
293,294
927,390
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
306,559
304,550
(19,419)
8,495 0
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
255,462
254,035
6,871
50,334 2
136 - Parks Trust Fund
170,323
169,198
1,896
3,685 N
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,110,856
1,103,508
18,839
20,996 N
138- Sister City Comm ission
13,101
13,031
2,618
2,737
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
49,192
49,193
7,327
30,041
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing Fd
118,848
112,152
18,220
40,407 V_
142 - Edmonds Cares Fund
5,946,550
5,946,550
5,946,550
5,946,550 0.
Total Special Revenue
$ 18,927,308
$ 17,679,465
$ 6,539,428 $
7,937,106 W
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for M
the purchase of Open Space.
c
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
LL
0
r
N
O
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
ENTERPRISE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
FUNDS
7/31/2021
7/31/2021
Q2
YTD r
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
m
E
421 -Water Utility Fund
$ 27,325,667
$ 6,146,734
$ (225,432) $
1,626,016
422 -Storm Utility Fund
14,872,292
5,580,171
(111,081)
1,281,604 Q
423-Sewer/WWTPUtility Fund
50,698,876
15,541,636
(3,586,284)
(1,699,553
424 - Bond Reserve Fund
843,967
843,967
2
6
411 -Combined Utility Operation
5,590
62,972
5,070
5,590
Total Enterprise Funds
$ 93,746,393
$ 28,175,479
$ (3,917,725) $
1,213,663
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance
has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
35
Packet Pg. 172
7.5.a
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
CITY-WIDE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
7/31 /2021 7/31 /2021
Q2
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
Governmental Funds
$ 43,532,369 $ 35,956,920
$
12,219,240 $
8,956,535
Enterprise Funds
93,746,393 28,175,479
(3,917,725)
1,213,663
Internal Services Fund
10,184,290 5,655,846
209,624
229,870 0
Agency Funds
71,983 71,983
(17,311)
(63,132
Total City-wide Total
$ 147,535,034 $ 69,860,228
$
8,493,828 $
10,336,936 2
U
c
c
ii
21
t
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
o
r
N
0
N
2,
3
7
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND Q.
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
—
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
7/31 /2021 7/31 /2021
Q2
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
c
ii
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
$ 9,190,451 $ 4,767,754
$
71,375 $
86,656 t
512 -Technology Rental Fund
993,838 888,093
138,249
c
143,215 0
Total Internal Service Funds
$ 10,184,290 $ 5,655,846
$
209,624 $
229,870 N
0
N
2,
7
r
C
d
E
t
V
a+
a+
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual
cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
36
Packet Pg. 173
7.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Proposed Amendments to PFD Charter
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Dave Turley
Background/History
The Edmonds Public Facilities District has proposed changes to the Edmonds Public Facilities District
Charter. These amendments are being submitted for consideration and ultimately formal approval by
Council.
Staff Recommendation
These documents were reviewed and discussed in Finance Committee on September 14, and the
Committee approved the proposed changes and recommended that they be placed on the September
21 Consent Agenda for approval by full Council.
Narrative:
The Board of Directors for the Edmonds Public Facilities District (District or PFD) requests that the City
Council approve a set of amendments to the District Charter, in the form of an "Amended and Restated"
Charter. Prior to the pandemic, the District identified a need to update this Charter to reflect long-
standing Board practices and improve Board member participation. On August 26th, 2021, the PFD
Board approved a Resolution recommending amendments to the Charter that would (1) accurately
document current roles on the Board; (2) reduce barriers to Board participation, and (3) provide the
Board with opportunity to nominate and remove Board members under certain circumstances.
The Amended and Restated Charter consolidates proposed amendments with amendments already
approved by Council in prior years. Key changes that would be adopted through this Amended and
Restated Charter are summarized below:
Section 5.02 - For open positions on the PFD Board, the District advertises open positions,
interviews candidates, and recommends candidates for formal appointment by City Council.
Added language in this section more accurately reflects this process and references the relevant
RCW governing PFD Board recruitment.
Section 5.02 - Provides for the ability to remove a current PFD Board member from service on
the Board by an affirmative majority vote of the Board when a member fails to attend three
consecutive meetings in a row unexcused.
Section 5.03 - Amended language here accurately reflects Board Officer positions, and mirrors
language in the Interlocal Agreement between Edmonds PFD and the City of Edmonds regarding
the Treasurer position.
Packet Pg. 174
7.6
Section 6.01- Updated language here provides the District Board with the ability to adjust its
regular meeting schedule more easily. Further, it ensures that regular meetings occur at least
quarterly, and it restates the District's adherence to the Open Public Meetings Act.
Section 6.02 - Added language allows for virtual meeting attendance going forward.
Language previously approved by Edmonds City Council regarding term limits (Section 5.02) and
establishing the current date of regular Board meetings (Section 6.01) has been incorporated into this
Amended and Restated Charter.
Attachments:
1 Signed Resolution #2021.01 - Authorizing Amendments to Articles V and VI
2 PFD Charter - City Ordinance Granting Charter - as amended
Packet Pg. 175
7.6.a
Edmonds Public Facilities District
RESOLUTION NO.2021.01
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES V AND VI OF THE DISTRICT'S
CHARTER.
WHEREAS, the District Board desires to improve the efficiency of its governance and oversight
of the administration and operations of Edmonds Center for the Arts; and
WHEREAS, the District has identified sections in the Charter that could be more efficient with
minor amendments; and
WHEREAS, the District Board has been notified and presented with the proposed the
amendments consistent with the provisions of Section 8 of the existing District Charter.
WHEREAS, any proposed amendments to the District's Charter must be submitted to Edmonds
City Council for consideration and possible approval by ordinance of the City Council:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edmonds Public Facilities District, Snohomish
County, Washington, as follows:
Section A. Recommended amendments to District Charter. The Board of Directors of
Edmonds Public Facilities District hereby submits its recommendations to its Charter as set forth
in the draft Amended and Restated District Charter in Attachment A to this Resolution to
Edmonds City Council for consideration and approval.
ADOPTED by the Board of the Edmonds Public Facilities District, Snohomish County,
Washington, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2021.
RESOLVED this ZtP day of /, 4q USAF' 12021.
By Board Member:
�—.
David Brewster
Board President
*Liaw
ber: --�
Board Vice President
6�nd� �
Dated
9) 11;)-1 -
Dated
August 26, 2021
Packet Pg. 176
7.6.b
EDMONDS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT
CHARTER
a�
R
z
v
0
u-
a
0
c
a�
E
c
E
a
E
m
r
Q
Packet Pg. 177
7.6.b
AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER
of the
EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
Packet Pg. 178
7.6.b
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I NAME
Section 1.01 Name
ARTICLE II NATURE AND PURPOSES
Section 2.01 Nature of the District
Section 2.02 Purposes
Section 2.03 Limitations on Liability
Section 2.04 Mandatory Disclaimers
ARTICLE III PERPETUAL EXISTENCE
Section 3.01 Perpetual Existence
ARTICLEN POWERS; INDEMNIFICATION
Section 4.01 Power
Section 4.02 Indemnification
ARTICLEV BOARD OF DIRECTORS; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR;
ATTORNEY A
Section 5.01 Board Powers
Section 5.02 Board Composition
Section 5.03 Board Officers
Section 5.04 Removal of Board Members
Section 5.05 Executive Director
Section 5.06 Conflict of Interest
Section 5.07 Attorney
ARTICLE VI MEETINGS
Section 6.01 Board Meetings
Section 6.02 Board Quorum and Concurrence
Section 6.03 Open Public Meetings
Section 6.04 Minutes
ARTICLE VII BYLAWS
Section 7.01 Bylaws
L
L
M
z
U
C
LL
IL
Page Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
C
N
1
�
d
1
E
E
c
2
E
2
Q
2
2
2
C
d
3
M
3
rn
M
3
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
i
Packet Pg. 179
7.6.b
ARTICLE VIII AMENDMENT TO CHARTER 7
Section 8.01 Proposals to Amend Charter 7
Section 8.02 Board Consideration of Proposed Amendments 7
Section 8.03 Vote Required for Proposals to Amend the Charter 7
Section 8.04 City Council Approval of Proposed Charter Amendments 7
ARTICLE IX COMMENCEMENT 7
Section 9.01 Commencement 7
ARTICLEX DISSOLUTION 7
Section 10.01 Dissolution 8
ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS 8
Section 11.01 Liberal Construction and Severability 8
L
d
M
t
U
C
U-
a
0
r
N
C
d
E
c
d
E
Q
Packet Pg. 180
7.6.b
AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER
of the
EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council') of the City of Edmonds, Washington
(the "City") has determined that it is in the best interests of the City and its citizens to
create a public facilities district coextensive with the boundaries of the City and to explore
the possible acquisition, construction, operation, promotion and financing of a convention
center, conference center, special events center and/or related parking and other facilities
within the City (the "Regional Center"); and
WHEREAS, Laws of Washington, 1999, Chapter 165, codified as Chapter 35.57 of
the Revised Code of Washington (the "Act") authorizes the Council, as the legislative
authority of a city located in a county with a population of less than one million, to create a
public facilities district coextensive with the boundaries of the City for the purposes, inter
alia, of acquiring, constructing, operating, promoting and financing a Regional Center; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3358 of the City, passed on April 24, 2001,
the City authorized and approved the creation of a public facilities district, designated as
the Edmonds Public Facilities District (the "District"), coextensive with the boundaries of
the City, to assist in the possible acquisition, construction, operation, promotion and
financing_ of a Regional Center;
NOW, THEREFORE, this Charter is hereby granted to and approved by the
District.
ARTICLE I
NAME
Section 1.01 Name. The name of the public facilities district shall be the "Edmonds
Public Facilities District."
ARTICLE II
Packet Pg. 181
7.6.b
NATURE AND PURPOSES
Section 2.01 Nature of the District. The District shall be a public facilities district
organized pursuant to the Act and Ordinance No. 3358. The boundaries of the District shall
be coextensive with the boundaries of the City. The District shall be a municipal
corporation, an independent taxing "authority" within the meaning of Article VII, Section I
of the Constitution of the State of Washington (the "Constitution"), and a "taxing district"
within the meaning of Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitution. The District shall be an
entity independent of and separate from the City.
Section 2.02 Purposes. The purpose of the District shall be to provide a separate
Legal entity pursuant to the Act and Ordinance No. 3358 to acquire, construct, own,
remodel, maintain, equip, re -equip, repair, finance and operate a Regional Center (as
hereinafter defined) and to carry on any other related activities in connection with the
foregoing. "Regional Center" shall mean a convention, conference or special events center,
or any combination of facilities, and related parking facilities, serving South Snohomish
County, Washington, constructed, improved or rehabilitated after the effective date of
Chapter 165, Laws of 1999, at a cost of at least ten million dollars, including debt service.
These purposes are hereby declared to be public purposes. No part of the revenues of the
District shall inure to the benefit of its directors or officers, or to any private person.
Section 2.03 Limitations on Liability. All debts, liabilities and other obligations
incurred by the District ("Obligations") shall be satisfied: (a) in the case of Obligations
which, by their terms, are not payable from a special or limited source of funds,
exclusively from the revenues, assets and properties of the District, and (b) in the case of
Obligations which, by their terms, are payable from a special or limited source of funds,
exclusively from such revenues, assets and properties of the District as shall be specifically
pledged thereto or otherwise identified as being the source of payment thereof. No creditor,
claimant or other person shall have any right of action against or recourse to the City or its
revenues, assets or properties on account of or with respect to any such Obligations, or
otherwise on account of or with respect to any acts or omissions of the District or its
officers, employees or agents.
Section 2.04 Mandatory Disclaimers. A disclaimer in substantially the following
form shall be posted in a prominent place accessible to the public in the District's principal
office and any other administrative offices. It shall also be printed or stamped on all
contracts, bonds and other documents that evidence or create any Obligation which, by its
terms, is not payable from a special or limited source of funds.
The Edmonds Public Facilities District is a public facilities district
established pursuant to Ordinance No. 3358 of the City of Edmonds,
Washington, and the laws of the State of Washington, including, but not
limited to, Chapter 35.57 of the Revised Code of Washington. All debts,
Packet Pg. 182
7.6.b
liabilities and other obligations incurred by the District shall be satisfied
exclusively from the revenues, assets and properties of the District. No
creditor, claimant or other person shall have any right of action against or
recourse to the City of Edmonds, the State of Washington, or any other
political subdivision of the State of Washington on account of or with
respect to any debts, liabilities or other obligations of the District, or
otherwise on account of or with respect to any acts or omissions of the
District or its officers, employees or agents.
In addition, a disclaimer in substantially the following form shall be printed or
stamped on all contracts, bonds and other documents that evidence or create any
Obligation which, by its terms, is payable from a special or limited source of funds.
The Edmonds Public Facilities District is a public facilities district
established pursuant to Ordinance No. 3358 of the City of Edmonds,
Washington, and the laws of the State of Washington, including, but not
limited to, Chapter 35.57 of the Revised Code of Washington. The
obligations of the District with respect to
[describe the contract, bond or other document] shall be and remain
special, limited obligations of the District payable solely from [describe the
particular revenues, assets or properties of the District from which the
obligations are payable]. In no event shall such obligations be payable from
or secured by any revenues, assets or properties of the District other than
those described in the preceding sentence, or by any revenues, assets or
properties of the City of Edmonds, the State of Washington or any other
political subdivision of the State of Washington. No creditor, claimant or
other person shall have any right of action against or recourse to the City of
Edmonds, the State of Washington, or any other political subdivision of the
State of Washington on account of or with respect to any debts, liabilities
or other obligations of the District, or otherwise on account of or with
respect to any acts or omissions of the District or its officers, employees or
agents.
ARTICLE III
PERPETUAL EXISTENCE
Section 3.01 Perpetual Existence. The District shall have a perpetual existence
until dissolved in accordance with this Charter and the Act.
ARTICLE IV
POWERS; INDEMNIFICATION
Packet Pg. 183
7.6.b
Section 4.01 Powers. Except as otherwise provided herein, the District shall have and may
exercise all lawful powers conferred upon public facilities districts as of the date hereof by
the laws of the State of Washington, including the Act, or as hereafter granted to the
District by statute. Such powers shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) To hire employees, staff, and services, to enter into contracts, to direct
agents and services acquired pursuant to interlocal agreement, and to sue and be sued;
(b) To acquire and transfer real and personal property by lease, sublease,
purchase or sale;
(c) To acquire, construct, own, remodel, maintain, equip, re -equip, repair,
finance and operate a Regional Center, and to -develop, promote and advertise such
Regional Center, and to exercise all powers reasonably necessary to fulfill its charge as
defined by ordinance, charter and state statute;
(d) To impose fees and charges for the use of its facilities, and to accept and
expend or use gifts, grants and donations.
(e) To impose charges, fees and taxes authorized by the Act, provided;
however, that no such taxes shall be imposed without either a public vote or the prior
consent and approval of the City by ordinance;
(f) To contract with public or private entities for the operation or management
of its public facilities; and
(g) To issue its general obligation bonds and revenue bonds pursuant to the Act.
Section 4.02 Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the District shall
protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent of
the District who is a party or threatened to be made a party to a proceeding by reason
related to that person's conduct as a director, officer, employee or agent of the District,
against judgments, fines, penalties, settlements and reasonable expenses (including
attorneys' fees) incurred by him or her in connection with such proceeding, if such person
acted in good faith and reasonably believed his or her conduct to be in the District's best
interests and if, in the case of any criminal proceedings, he or she had no reasonable cause
to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification and protection
provided herein shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which a person may
be entitled as a matter of law or by contract or by vote of the Board of Directors. The
District may purchase and maintain appropriate insurance covering such risks.
ARTICLE V
Packet Pg. 184
7.6.b
BOARD OF DIRECTORS; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Cl
Section 5.01 Board Powers. All powers of the District shall be exercised by or in
M
V
the name of the Board of Directors (the "Board"). The powers of the Board shall include,LL
p
but are not limited to, the following:
a
(a) To establish and implement the policies and programs of the District, and
0
the procedures for the management and administration of the District's affairs;
cN
(b) To appoint and remove, at the pleasure of the Board, the District's officers,
d
E
agents and employees, and to prescribe their respective powers and duties consistent with
c
the provisions hereof;
E
a
(c) To borrow money and incur indebtedness in accordance with the Act; and
(d) To provide for the investment of the District's funds.
Section 5.02 Board Composition. The Board shall be composed of five (5)
c
m
M
members appointed by the Council to four (4) year terms. However, of the initial members,
one shall be appointed for a one-year te_rm-�, one shall be appointed for a two-year term,
W
one shall be appointed for a three-year term and the remainder shall be appointed for
i
four-year terms. Two of the members of the Board shall be appointed at the sole discretion
of the Council so long as neither appointee is a member of the Council. Three of the
0
M
members of the Board shall be appointed by the Council based upon the recommendations
0
of local organizations that may include, but are not limited to, the Edmonds Chamber of
tM
c
Commerce, local economic development organizations and local labor councils. Following
appointment of initial members, members of the Board shall be appointed by the Council
based upon the recommendations of the Edmonds Center for the Arts or its successor
organization consistent with the requirements of RCW 35.57.010-_Board members need
v
not be residents of the City of Edmonds. A vacancy or vacancies on the Board shall be
M
deemed to exist in case of the death, disability, resignation, or removal, of F�
E
E
gip. A vacancy caused by resignation shall be deemed to exist upon the effective
0
date of the resignation, with no formal acceptance thereof necessary. A Board member
may be removed by the affirmative vote of the -Board when the member fails to attend
V
three consecutive meetings of the Board without approval from the Board. Vacancies on
the Board shall be filled by appointment in accordance with the above provisions. Any
L
person selected to fill a vacancy on the Board shall serve the balance of the term of the
t
person being replaced.
V
No member of the Board shall serve more than eight (8) consecutive pears as a member of
U_
the Board (the "Term Limit"); except when a member is appointed mid-term to fill a
a
vacant position the appointee map serve out this partial term and then be eligible to serve
N
two (2) additional four (4)year terms; and except that members of the Board serving four
(4) year terms at the time the District adopts the Term Limit shall be permitted to serve the
E
t
0
r
a
Packet Pg. 185
7.6.b
remainder of their current terms unless they resign, or are removed, pursuant to this
L
Charter.
M
t
U
C
Section 5.03 Board Officers. The Board shall include three or more officers. The
LL
a
same person shall not occupy both the office of President and any office responsible for the
custody of funds and maintenance of finances and accounts. The iaitW officers of the
Board shall be the President, the Vice-President/Secretary and the Treasurer. The Treasurer
shall be the City of Edmonds Finance Director and shall serve as an ex officio member of
E
the Board. Additional officers may be provided for in the Bylaws of the District. -The
d
E
provided, that the Bylaws may designate additional effieer-s of the Distriet as agents to
reeeive or initiate . The District may contract with the City for the services of the
City Administrative Services Director as custodian of the District's funds.
m
Section 5.04 Removal of Board Members. The Council may by resolution
E
remove any or all Board members, with or without cause; provided, that on the date of or
M
prior to such removal the Council shall appoint a replacement for each member removed in
M
accordance with the provisions hereof. A copy of the resolution removing a Board member
and a letter signed by the Mayor of the City advising such member of his or her removal
shall be delivered to such Board member promptly following the adoption of any such
resolution.
V
Section 5.05 Executive Director. The Board may appoint an Executive Director.
The Executive Director shall be the chief administrative officer of the District and shall be
subject to supervision by the Board. The Executive Director shall have such powers and
L
(�
perform such duties as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board, and shall be
a)
v
entitled to notices of all meetings of the Board; provided, however, that the Executive
cM
Director shall not be entitled to be present during any discussions relating to his or her
employment or performance unless permitted by the Board or as required by law. The
Executive Director shall be the agent of the District for purposes of receiving service of
O
0
ron cess The Executive Director shall have primary responsibility for all matters involving
V
day-to-day operations of the District, and shall make recommendations to the Board on
,
practices, policies and programs of the District. The District may contract with the City for
the services of an Executive Director. In the absence of an Executive Director, all powers
otherwise delegated to the Executive Director may be exercised by the President of the
V
Board.
p
Section 5.06 Conflict of Interest. No member of the Board nor the Executive
a_
a
Director shall be beneficially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract, sale, lease or
cm
purchase which may be made by, through or under supervision of such official, in whole or
d
in part, or which may be made for the benefit of his or her office, or accept, directly or
E
indirectly, any compensation, gratuity or reward in connection with such contract from any
v
M
r
a
Packet Pg. 186
7.6.b
other person beneficially interested therein. This section shall not apply to any remote
interest of any such official.
Section 5.07 Attorney. The Board may be represented by the'- City- Attorney -of
the City of Edmonds; pr-e ,idea 1.... eve dia4 4he Board may, in 4he 0 ea4 of eenfliet or
engage separate legal counsel of its choosing. Any potential conflicts of interest involving
the City Attorney shall be determined and resolved by reference to Title 1 of the Rules of
Professional Conduct, as that Title now exists or may be amended.
ARTICLE VI
MEETINGS
Section 6.01 Board Meetings. Regular Board meetings shall be held on the fourth
iF4 Thursday of each month or as set forth by separate Board Resolution. There shall be at
least one Regular Board meeting in each calendar quarter of the year
-rt,ufsday of T me of each yean Special Board meetings shall be held from time to time as
determined necessary by the Board. Board Meetings shall be conducted pursuant to the
Open Public Meetings Act.
Section 6.02 Board Ouorum and Concurrence. A quorum to commence a Board
meeting shall be no fewer than three (3) members. The Bylaws of the District may
prescribe Board quorum restrictions that equal or exceed the quorum restrictions imposed
in this Section. Board members present either in person or virtually at a duly convened
meeting may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough
members to leave less than a quorum; provided, any action shall be approved by at least
three (3) members. Board concurrence may be obtained at any regular or special meeting
by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Board members voting on the issue; provided,
that such majority shall include not less than three (3) votes. Voting by telephane OF by
proxy shall not be permittecY
Section 6.03 Open Public Meetings. Notice of meetings shall be given in a
manner consistent with the Open Public Meetings Act, Laws of Washington 1971,
Extraordinary Session, Chapter 250, codified as Chapter 42.30 of the Revised Code of
Washington, as supplemented and amended. In addition, the District shall provide
reasonable notice of meetings to any individual specifically requesting it in writing. The
District shall define in its Bylaws the opportunity for public comment to be granted at
Board meetings.
Section 6.04 Minutes. Copies of the minutes of all regular or special meetings of
the Board shall be available to any person or organization that requests them as required by
State law; provided, however, that minutes with respect to closed executive sessions need
Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5"
Packet Pg. 187
7.6.b
not be made available. The minutes of all Board meetings shall include a record of
L
individual votes on all matters requiring Board concurrence.
t
U
ARTICLE VII
p
BYLAWS
U-
a
Section 7.01 Bylaws. The Board shall adopt Bylaws to provide additional rules,
that are not inconsistent with this Charter, governing the District and its activities.
N
c
ARTICLE VIII
m
E
AMENDMENT TO CHARTER
c
Section 8.01 Proposals to Amend Charter. Any Board member may introduce a
d
E
proposal to amend the Charter at any regular meeting or special meeting of the Board.
--
m
c
Section 8.02 Board Consideration of Proposed Amendments. If notice of a
m
proposal to amend the Charter and information, including the text of the proposed
M
amendment and a statement of its purpose and effect, is provided to members of the Board
y
M
fifteen (15) days prior to any regular Board meeting or any special meeting of which thirty
L
(30) days advance notice has been given, then the Board may vote on the proposal at the
same meeting at which the proposal is introduced. If such notice and information is not so
M
provided, the Board may not vote on the proposal until the next regular meeting or a
V
special meeting of which thirty (30) days advance notice has been given, and in each case
at least fifteen (15) days prior to which meeting such notice and information is provided to
Board members. The Board may waive the notice time periods set forth in this Section
L
upon the affirmative vote of the Board. Amendments to the proposal within the scope of
C9
the original proposal will be permitted at the meeting at which the vote is taken.
v
Section 8.03 Vote Required for Proposals to Amend the Charter. Resolutions of
c
M
c
the Board approving proposals to amend the Charter shall require an affirmative vote of a
=a
majority of the Board members voting on the issue; provided, that the total number of
O
Board members voting on any such proposal shall equal at least four.
V
Section 8.04 City Council Approval of Proposed Charter Amendments.
Proposals to amend the Charter that are approved by the Board shall be submitted to the
Council for consideration. The Charter may be amended only by ordinance of the Council.
M
After the District has been created, no amendments shall be undertaken to this Charter
V
except pursuant to a proposal of the Board.
p
ARTICLE IX
U-
a
COMMENCEMENT
CM
c
d
E
t
M
r
a
Packet Pg. 188
7.6.b
Section 9.01 Commencement. The District shall commence its existence effective
upon the adoption of Ordinance No. 3358. This Charter shall be effective as of the
effective date of City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 3361.
ARTICLEX
DISSOLUTION
Section 10.01 Dissolution. The District may be dissolved pursuant to an ordinance
passed by the Council and in such manner as may be required by State law; provided,
however, that the District shall not be dissolved so long as it has any outstanding
Obligations. Upon dissolution of the District and the winding up of its affairs, title to all
remaining property and assets of the District shall vest in the City to be used for public
purposes consistent with the powers granted to the City under Title 35A RCW, and, in the
event of donated funds or property, consistent with the terms, if any, of such donation.
ARTICLE XI
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 11.01 Liberal Construction and Severability. This Charter shall be
liberally construed in order to affect its purposes. If any section or part of this Charter is
ultimately ruled invalid or illegal by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
illegality shall not affect the remaining sections or parts of this Charter.
THIS CHARTER IS EXECUTED AS OF THIS DAY OF 12021.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED
CITY OF EDMONDS
BY:
MAYOR
City Clerk
Packet Pg. 189
7.6.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
m-
r
Q
Packet Pg. 190
7.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Audio/Visual Assistant Job Description
Staff Lead: Emily Wagener
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: Emily Wagener
Background/History
The City has long retained an employee via an employment agreement as an Administrative Assistant in
charge of Audio/Video recording for City Council and Planning Board meetings. Historically, this position
has been employed through an employment contract with 2-year terms. Human Resources has
reviewed and updated the related job description and compensation. The Job Description is ready to be
reviewed and approved. Once approved, the employee currently working in this position will be
transitioned over to the hourly wage scale and future employee agreements will no longer be necessary.
This item was approved to be placed on the 9/21/2021 consent agenda at the 9/14/2021 Personnel
Committee.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the attached Job Description on Consent.
Narrative
Through conversations between HR and Administrative Services, it was determined this position would
better fit under Information Services in the Administrative Services Department. The title of the position
was also adjusted to better match with the listed job duties.
See the attached job description.
Attachments:
Audio Visual Assistant FINAL
Packet Pg. 191
7.7.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Audio/Visual Assistant
Department:
Administrative Services
Pay Grade:
H-13
Bargaining Unit:
Hourly
FLSA Status:
Non -Exempt
Revised Date:
07/13/2021
Reports To:
IS Manager
POSITION PURPOSE:
To perform reliable audio/visual recordings as needed for public meetings with majority of support to City Council
and the Planning Division.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees
in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may
not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties.
• Operates various audio/visual equipment (including but not limited to: TV camera, monitoring cameras,
City's recording equipment)
• Set up and take down council meetings (including but not limited to: checking equipment, put out
nameplates, distribute coffee, turn on lights)
• Operates equipment if needed for council committee meetings.
• Assist other departments who need video recording of significant public meetings (including but not limited
to: Planning Board, Housing Commission, Chamber of Commerce, Policeman's Recognition)
• Record Public Meetings as assigned.
• Work with IT as needed to troubleshoot issues.
• Work closely with the City Clerk.
Required Knowledge of:
• Running and troubleshooting standard audio/visual and recording equipment.
• Recording techniques and/or requirements.
• Effective oral communication principles and practices.
Required Skill in:
• Planning and organizing work, prioritizing tasks, and using time effectively.
• Adapting to changes in technology.
• Interpreting and applying federal, state, and local policies, laws and regulations related to assigned work.
• Utilizing relevant equipment that may affect assigned work.
• Communicating effectively verbally.
Audio/Visual Assistant Last Reviewe
Last Revise Packet Pg. 192
7.7.a
2 of 2
JOB DESCRIPTION
Audio/Visual Assistant
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
High School Diploma and prior experience working with audio and visual equipment OR an equivalent combination
of education, training and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions
of the position.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Indoor work environment.
• Must be able to attend evening meetings on a regular basis
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person and/or on the phone.
• Operating/using a related audio/visual/recording equipment.
• Reading and understanding related materials.
• Sitting, standing, or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Lifting/carrying/pushing/pulling or otherwise moving or transporting related equipment up to 20 pounds.
Hazards:
• Prolonged exposure to glare from monitors.
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Audio/Visual Assistant
Last Reviewed: 08/31 /2021
Last Revise
Packet Pg. 193
7.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Civic Park Funding - Washington State DOC Grant
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Narrative
Earlier this year, the Edmonds Rotary applied for and was awarded a State of Washington Department
of Commerce Appropriation of $258,000 for the Civic Park Mika's Playground Project. After the award, it
was discovered that the Rotary was not technically eligible to be the recipient of the grant funding, but
the City of Edmonds needs to be the entity to receive and manage the grant funding. In order to change
the name of the grantee and continue the grant funding process, a letter is required from the City of
Edmonds stating agreement to accept the funds, complete the project as originally intended and has
ownership of the site.
Due to the amount of the grant and related obligation, Council approval is needed to authorize the
Mayor to sign the letter, which is attached.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends Council review and approval authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter changing the
grantee status from the Edmonds Rotary to the City of Edmonds to receive and manage a $258,000
State of Washington Department of Commerce Appropriation to fund the all-inclusive Mika's
Playground at the Civic Park project.
Attachments:
City of Edmonds - Change of Grantee Mikas Playground Civic Park
Packet Pg. 194
7.8.a
CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON
IL I_\'Lo]110
CITY HALL • THIRD FLOOR
121 5T" AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425.771-0247 • fax 425.771.0252
www.edmondswa.gov
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
'roc. 1 g9"
September 8, 2021
Department of Commerce
Beth Robinson, Program Manager
Local Government Division
Capital Programs Unit
PO Box 42525
Olympia WA 98504-2525
Dear Beth,
Earlier this year, the Edmonds Rotary applied for and was awarded a State of Washington
Department of Commerce Appropriation of $258,000 for the Civic Park Mika's Playground
Project. After the award it was discovered that the Rotary was not technically eligible to be the
recipient of the grant funding, but the City of Edmonds needs to be the entity to receive and
manage the grant.
The City of Edmonds has ownership of the project site, is willing to become the funding
grantee, agrees to accept and manage the funding and complete the project as originally
intended.
Thank you for the consideration and we look forward to using this funding to provide an all-
inclusive playground for the greater Edmonds community.
Sincerely,
Mayor Mike Nelson
• Incorporated August 11,1890 •
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Packet Pg. 195
7.9
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Civic Park Funding - 2021 Snohomish County ILA
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Background/History
Civic Center Playfield Park project is the renovation of an 8-acre park in downtown Edmonds with a
currently estimated construction cost of $13,757,730. The construction project started on August 9,
2021 and is scheduled to continue through fall of 2022.
This project has numerous funding sources including grants and a variety of city revenues allocated by
Council. Four primary sources of grants, totally nearly $3.5M, include the Snohomish County, State of
Washington Recreation and Conservation Office programs, Hazel Miller Foundation and Verdant Health
Commission. In 2018, the City applied for Snohomish County REET (Real Estate Excise Tax) funding.
Representative Stephanie Wright recommended the allocation of $450,000 over three years, which was
approved by the County Council that same year. The first $150,000 allocation was awarded to the City in
2019, with the second delayed to this year due to COVID uncertainties in 2020 and the third is slated for
allocation in 2022.
The current County's 2021 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) template is attached for review with the
completed ILA to be provided for Consent Agenda. (The full ILA with all eight attachments was not
available at the time this agenda item was due for submission, but all the attachments will be included
for the Consent Agenda item).
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council consideration and approval of the attached 2021 Interlocal Agreement
(ILA) between Snohomish County and City of Edmonds for $150,000 in REET funding for the Civic Park
project.
Narrative
In early 2016, after leasing for 40 years, the nearly 8-acre Civic Center Playfield property was acquired by
the City from the Edmonds School District for $1.9M with all but $400,000 funded by grants.
A year after acquisition in 2017, a Master Plan using a robust public process was adopted by Council
with the work of consulting firm of Walker Macy. The same firm was later approved by the Council to
complete the design development, permitting, bidding, and support during construction.
In 2018, the City began applying for grants and in November of that year the Council adopted the Parks
Capital Improvement (CIP) and Capital Facilities (CFP) Plans identifying Civic Park as a project and it was
Packet Pg. 196
7.9
approved each year since. Also, in 2018, the 50-year old Grandstand was demolished. The next year,
2019, the Council issued the $3.7m bond to fund construction.
The project was bid three times over the course of 2020 and 2021, with a successful award on July 13,
2021 to A-1 Landscaping and Construction.
Park Design
The proposed park renovation project includes youth athletic fields, upgraded sports lighting,
permanent restrooms, shade pavilion, improved skate park, rubber surface walking/running path,
petanque court grove, a pollinator meadow, tennis, pickleball and basketball courts, a 1/3-mile
perimeter walking path, fully inclusive playground, picnic areas, public art and more.
The existing Field House, leased to Boys & Girls Club of Snohomish County since 1962, will remain intact
as well as a designated 20,000 square foot area around it to enable the Boys & Girls Club to continue
operations.
Attachments:
2021 ILA SnoCo - CoE Civic Park REET Funding 2021-09-16
Packet Pg. 197
7.9.a
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY
OF EDMONDS FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS
This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE
CITY OF EDMONDS FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS (this "Agreement"), is made and
entered into this day of , 2021, by and between SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Washington (the "County"), and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a
Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW.
RECITALS
A. The 2007 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan, a component of the N
Snohomish County Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan, has documented a County- a
wide need for a wide variety of recreational facilities; and
B. The County Executive and the County Council have determined that it is consistent Ui
with the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan and is in the public interest of County residents
to participate in joint undertakings with local municipalities to increase recreational opportunities a
and facility capacity; and
C. The County Council approved Amended Ordinance 20-071, adopted November 10,
2020, which adopted the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program as part of the Snohomish c
County Capital Facilities Plan, and which Amended Ordinance is included as Attachment A, r
N
incorporated herein by this reference; and N
a
D. Part of the 2021 — 2026 Capital Improvement Program budget included funding
titled "City Partnerships" in the amount of $150,000 for qualifying projects in County Council
District #3. The County has determined to undertake a capital improvement project in District #3 w
in partnership with the City of Edmonds, including the provision of funding by the County to the W
City of Edmonds for Civic Park Improvements, in an amount up to One Hundred Fifty Thousand
and no/100 Dollars ($150,000) in County REET 2 funds (the "Funds"). The Funds will be directed a
for the purpose of funding for park improvements at Civic Park. Snohomish County Parks and
Recreation Fund 309—Community Parks is included as Attachment B, incorporated herein by this
reference; and J
U
E. The City of Edmonds has provided the following: a written request to the County c
for the funds (Attachment C, incorporated herein by this reference); a description of the project c
(Attachment D, incorporated herein by this reference); a confirmation from the City indicating (n
ownership interest in the property (Attachment E, incorporated herein by this reference); and a
description of the City's involvement and on -going role in planning, design, development, r
maintenance, and operation of the Project (Attachment F, incorporated herein by this reference); N
Proof of Insurance (Attachment G, incorporated herein by this reference); and relevant portions of
the City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) including the property and project, Parks, General, and
Regional Projects 2020-2025, as further described herein (Attachment H, incorporated herein by
this reference); and
Q
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 1 of 9
Packet Pg. 198
7.9.a
F. Pursuant to this Agreement and Chapter 39.34 RCW, the County wishes to provide,
and the City wishes to accept, the above -described Funds from the County.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective agreements set forth below and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the County and the City agree as follows:
Purpose of Agreement.
This Agreement is authorized by and entered into pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW. The
purpose and intent of this Agreement is to define the responsibilities of the County and the City as
they relate to the County's provision of the funds to the City's project located at Civic Park, 310
6th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA (the "Park Property"). Planned site enhancements include the
addition of a gathering area with water feature, a walking path around the perimeter, a multi -use
sport court and exercise equipment, as well as a picnic area and restroom. (the "Project").
2. Effective Date and Duration.
This Agreement shall not take effect unless and until it has been duly executed by both
parties and either filed with the County Auditor or posted on the County's Interlocal Agreements
website. This Agreement shall remain in effect through December 31, 2022, unless earlier
terminated pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 below, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that each
party's obligations are contingent upon local legislative appropriation of necessary funds for this
specific purpose in accordance with applicable law.
3. Administrators.
Each party to this Agreement shall designate an individual (an "Administrator"), who may
be designated by title or position, to oversee and administer such party's participation in this
Agreement. The parties' initial Administrators shall be the following individuals:
County's Initial Administrator: City's Initial Administrator:
Tom Teigen, Director
Snohomish County Department of
Conservation & Natural Resources
6705 Puget Park Drive
Snohomish, Washington 98296
(425) 388-6617 phone
Tom. Teigen(d), snoco. org
Shannon Burley, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services
700 Main Street
Edmonds, Washington 98020
425-771-0256
Shannon.Burley(&,,edmondswa. _og_v
Either party may change its Administrator at any time by delivering written notice of such
party's new Administrator to the other party.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 2 of 9
T
N
O
N
a
a)
E
U
2
Q
Packet Pg. 199
7.9.a
4. Proiect Performance.
4.1 Certification of Real Property Interest. The City certifies to the County that the
City owns the real property or easements upon which the Project shall be executed, and additional
real property or easements are not needed to complete the Project.
4.2 City's Financial Commitment. The City certifies to the County that the City has
monies sufficient to match any funding provided by the County to the City under the terms of this
Agreement and will have sufficient monies to complete the Project by the Project deadline
identified in Section 4.3 below (the "City's Financial Commitment").
4.3 Project Deadline. On or before December 31, 2022, the City shall complete the
Project. In executing the Project, the City shall obtain and, upon request, provide the County with
copies of all permits necessary to complete the Project.
4.4 Recognition of County as Financial Sponsor. The City shall recognize the County
as a financial sponsor of the Project as follows:
4.4.1 Upon completion of the Project or dedication of the Park Property,
whichever comes first, the City shall install at the Park Property a plaque in a form approved by
the County that indicates that the County is a financial sponsor of or contributor to the Project;
4.4.2 The City shall invite the County to all events promoting the Project or Park
Property and recognize the County at all such events as a financial sponsor of the Project;
4.4.3 The City shall recognize the County as a financial sponsor in all brochures,
banners, posters, and other promotional material related to the Project.
4.5 Project Maintenance. The City shall be responsible for on -going capital
improvements to, and maintenance of, the Project and City Property. The County makes no
commitment to support the Project or City Property beyond what is provided for in this Agreement
and assumes no obligation for future support of the Project or City Property except as expressly
set forth in this Agreement.
4.6 Availability to County Residents. The City shall make the Property available to all
County residents on the same terms as to residents of the City.
5. Invoicing and Payment.
T
5.1 Invoicing. Prior to December 31, 2022, the City shall submit to the County an c
invoice requesting disbursement of the Funds for the Project. The invoice shall provide line item N
detail for materials, labor and overhead and include any documentation requested by the County,
including but not limited to documentation as to what amounts have been spent by the City on the
Project. o
Q
5.2 Payment. Unless the County delivers to the City written notice disputing the
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS
3 of 9
Packet Pg. 200
7.9.a
amount of a particular line item, within twenty (20) working days of receipt from the City of an
invoice properly submitted to the County pursuant to Section 5.1, the County shall remit to the
City an amount not to exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($150,000.00).
5.3 No Overpayments. In the event that the Project is completed for less than the
combined total of the Funds and the City's Financial Commitment, the County shall remit to the
City an amount of Funds equal to the difference between the City's Financial Commitment and
the total cost of the Project. In no case shall the City retain Funds which it does not utilize in the
Project or that it utilizes in the Project without first exhausting the City's Financial Commitment.
Should an overpayment occur, the County shall give written notice to the City of the overpayment,
and within thirty (30) days of the notice of overpayment the City shall return to the County the
overpaid Funds plus interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum beginning thirty (30)
days from the date of the notice of overpayment.
5.4 Accounting. The City shall maintain a system of accounting and internal controls
that complies with generally accepted accounting principles and governmental accounting and
financial reporting standards and provisions concerning preservation and destruction of public
documents in accordance with applicable laws, including Chapter 40.14 RCW.
5.5 Recordkeeping. The City shall maintain adequate records to support billings. The
records shall be maintained by the City for a period of five (5) years after completion of this
Agreement. The County, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall have access to books,
documents, or papers and records of the City relating to this Agreement for purposes of inspection,
audit, or the making of excerpts or transcripts.
5.6 Audit and Repayment. The City shall return Funds disbursed to it by the County
under this Agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following events:
5.6.1 If overpayments are made; or
5.6.2 If an audit of the Project by the State or the County determines that the
Funds have been expended for purposes not permitted by the REET 2 statute, the
State, the County, or this Agreement.
In the case of 5.6.1 or 5.6.2, the County shall make a written demand upon the City for repayment, v
and the City shall be obligated to repay to the County the Funds demanded within sixty (60) °c
calendar days of the demand. The County's right to demand repayment from the City may be
exercised as often as necessary to recoup from the City all Funds required to be returned to the J
County. N
0
N
The City is solely responsible for seeking repayment from any subcontractor in conformance with
its debt collection policy. E
6. Independent Contractor. The City will perform all work associated with the Project as Q
an independent contractor and not as an agent, employee, or servant of the County. The City shall
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 4 of 9
Packet Pg. 201
7.9.a
be solely responsible for control, supervision, direction and discipline of its personnel, who shall
be employees and agents of the City and not the County. The County shall only have the right to
ensure performance.
7. Indemnification/Hold Harmless.
The City shall assume the risk of liability for damage, loss, costs and expense arising out
of the activities under this Agreement and all use of any improvements it may place on the
Property. The City shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the County, its officers, elected and
appointed officials, employees and agents from and against all claims, losses, lawsuits, actions,
counsel fees, litigation costs, expenses, damages, judgments, or decrees by reason of damage to
any property or business and/or any death, injury or disability to or of any person or party,
including but not limited to any employee, arising out of or suffered, directly or indirectly, by
reason of or in connection with the acquisition or use of the Park Property and this Agreement;
PROVIDED, that the above indemnification does not apply to those damages solely caused by the
negligence or willful misconduct of the County, its elected and appointed officials, officers,
employees or agents. This indemnification obligation shall include, but is not limited to, all claims
against the County by an employee or former employee of City, and City, by mutual negotiation,
expressly waives all immunity and limitation on liability, as respects the County only, under any
industrial insurance act, including Title 51 RCW, other Worker's Compensation act, disability
benefit act, or other employee benefit act of any jurisdiction which would otherwise be applicable
in the case of such claim.
8. Liability Related to City Ordinances, Policies, Rules and Regulations.
In executing this Agreement, the County does not assume liability or responsibility for or
in any way release the City from any liability or responsibility which arises in whole or in part
from the existence or effect of City ordinances, policies, rules or regulations. If any cause, claim,
suit, action or administrative proceeding is commenced in which the enforceability and/or validity
of any such City ordinance, policy, rule or regulation is at issue, the City shall defend the same at
its sole expense and, if judgment is entered or damages are awarded against the City, the County,
or both, the City shall satisfy the same, including all chargeable costs and reasonable attorney's
fees.
9. Insurance.
The City shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in connection with, a
exercise of the rights and privileges granted by this Agreement, by the City, its agents,
J
T
representatives, and employees/subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be paid by the c
City. N
c
d
9.1 Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. General Liability: Insurance Services
Office Form No. CG 00 01 Ed. 11-88, covering COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY with o
limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal Q
injury, and property damage.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 5 of 9
Packet Pg. 202
7.9.a
9.2 Other Insurance Provisions. Coverage shall be written on an "Occurrence" form.
The insurance policies required in this Agreement are to contain or be endorsed to contain the
County, its officers, officials, employees, and agents as additional insureds as respects liability
arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the City in connection with this Agreement.
9.3 Verification of Coverage. The City shall furnish the County with certificate(s) of
insurance and endorsement(s) required by this Agreement.
9.4 In lieu of the insurance required in this Section 9, the City may, upon request of
and acceptance by the County, provide the County a letter certifying the City's self-insurance
program.
10. Compliance with Laws.
In the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, each party shall comply with
all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations.
11. Default and Remedies.
11.1 Default. If either the County or the City fails to perform any act or obligation
required to be performed by it hereunder, the other party shall deliver written notice of such failure
to the non -performing party. The non -performing party shall have twenty (20) days after its receipt
of such notice in which to correct its failure to perform the act or obligation at issue, after which
time it shall be in default ("Default") under this Agreement; provided, however, that if the non-
performance is of a type that could not reasonably be cured within said twenty (20) day period,
then the non -performing party shall not be in Default if it commences cure within said twenty (20)
day period and thereafter diligently pursues cure to completion.
11.2 Remedies. In the event of a parry's Default under this Agreement, then after
giving notice and an opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 11.1 above, the non -Defaulting party
shall have the right to exercise any or all rights and remedies available to it in law or equity.
12. Early Termination.
12.1 30 Days' Notice. Except as provided in Section 12.2 below, either party may c
terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days
advance written notice to the other parry. The termination notice shall specify the date on which a
the Agreement shall terminate. J
T
N
O
12.2 Termination for Breach. In the event that the City fails to complete Phase 1 of the N
Project by December 31, 2022, and/or otherwise commits a Default as described in Section 11, the
County may terminate this Agreement immediately by delivering written notice to the City. Within
thirty (30) days of such early termination, the City shall return to the County all Funds previously o
disbursed from the County to the City for the Project plus interest at the rate of twelve percent Q
(12%) per annum beginning thirty (30) days from the date of early termination.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 6 of 9
Packet Pg. 203
7.9.a
13. Dispute Resolution.
In the event differences between the parties should arise over the terms and conditions or
the performance of this Agreement, the parties shall use their best efforts to resolve those
differences on an informal basis. If those differences cannot be resolved informally, the matter
may be referred for mediation to a mediator mutually selected by the parties. If mediation is not
successful or if a party waives mediation, either of the parties may institute legal action for specific
performance of this Agreement or for damages. The prevailing party in any legal action shall be
entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee and court costs.
14. Notices.
All notices required to be given by any party to the other party under this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be delivered either in person, by United States mail, or by electronic mail
(email) to the applicable Administrator or the Administrator's designee. Notice delivered in person
shall be deemed given when accepted by the recipient. Notice by United States mail shall be
deemed given as of the date the same is deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and
addressed to the Administrator, or their designee, at the addresses set forth in Section 3 of this
Agreement. Notice delivered by email shall be deemed given as of the date and time received by
the recipient.
15. Miscellaneous.
15.1 Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any and all prior oral or
written agreements between the parties regarding the subject matter contained herein. This
Agreement may not be modified or amended in any manner except by a written document executed
with the same formalities as required for this Agreement and signed by the party against whom
such modification is sought to be enforced.
15.2 Conflicts between Attachments and Text. Should any conflicts exist between any
attached exhibit or schedule and the text or main body of this Agreement, the text or main body of
this Agreement shall prevail.
15.3 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and enforced c
in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The venue of any action arising out of this
Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for Snohomish a
County. In the event that a lawsuit is instituted to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the J
T
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs of such a lawsuit, including reasonable c
attorney's fees. cm
c
as
15.4 Interpretation. This Agreement and each of the terms and provisions of it are
deemed to have been explicitly negotiated by the parties, and the language in all parts of this o
Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or Q
against either of the parties hereto. The captions and headings in this Agreement are used only for
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 7 of 9
Packet Pg. 204
7.9.a
convenience and are not intended to affect the interpretation of the provisions of this Agreement.
This Agreement shall be construed so that wherever applicable the use of the singular number shall
include the plural number, and vice versa, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all
genders.
15.5 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall, for any reason and to any extent, be found invalid or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement and the application of that provision to other persons or
circumstances shall not be affected thereby, but shall instead continue in full force and effect, to
the extent permitted by law.
15.6 No Waiver. A party's forbearance or delay in exercising any right or remedy with
respect to a Default by the other party under this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the
Default at issue. Nor shall a waiver by either party of any particular Default constitute a waiver of
any other Default or any similar future Default.
15.7 No Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned, either in whole or in part,
by either party without the express written consent of the other party, which may be granted or
withheld in such party's sole discretion. Any attempt to assign this Agreement in violation of the
preceding sentence shall be null and void and shall constitute a Default under this Agreement.
15.8 Warranty of Authority. Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents
that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party for
whom he or she purports to sign this Agreement.
15.9 No Joint Venture. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as
creating any type or manner of partnership, joint venture or other joint enterprise between the
parties.
15.10 No Separate Entity Necessary The parties agree that no separate legal or
administrative entities are necessary to carry out this Agreement.
15.11 Ownership of Property Except as expressly provided to the contrary in this
Agreement, any real or personal property used or acquired by either party in connection with its
performance under this Agreement will remain the sole property of such party, and the other party
shall have no interest therein.
15.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement and each and every provision a
hereof is for the sole benefit of the City and the County. No other persons or parties shall be deemed J
T
to have any rights in, under or to this Agreement. N
N
15.13 Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which shall constitute one and
the same agreement. o
Q
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS
8of9
Packet Pg. 205
7.9.a
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written.
COUNTY:
CITY:
Snohomish County, a political subdivision City of Edmonds, a Washington
of the State of Washington municipal corporation
:A
Name: Dave Somers
Title: County Executive
Approved as to Form:
/s/ Sean Reav DPA 5 27 2021
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR
CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Name: Mike Nelson
Title: Mayor
Attest/Authenticate
By
Name:
Title:
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
9of9
T
N
O
N
C
GN
E
t
U
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 206
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT A
Amended Ordinance 20-071
N
O
N
C
0
E
t
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 207
7.9.a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
ADOPTED: 11/10/20
EFFECTIVE: 12/03/20
SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT, ADOPTING THE 2021-2026
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW, requires counties to
adopt, as part of a GMA comprehensive plan ("GMACP"), a capital facilities element that includes a
six -year plan providing for the financing of capital facilities within projected funding capacities and
clearly identifying sources of public money for such purposes; and
WHEREAS, Snohomish County (the "County") addresses this requirement by annually
adopting a capital improvement program ("CIP") as an adjunct to its annual budget; and
WHEREAS, GMA Goal 12, RCW 36.70A.020(12), regarding public facilities and services,
addresses the need to ensure the adequacy of public facilities and services to serve the
development at the time the development is available for occupancy and without decreasing the
current levels of service below locally established minimum standards; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv) allows the County to amend the GMACP more
frequently than once per year if the amendment is to the capital facilities element and occurs
concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the County's budget; and
WHEREAS, GMACP - General Policy Plan (GPP) Capital Facilities Objective 1.13 and
associated policies require the County to develop a six -year financing program for capital facilities
that meets the requirements of the GMA; and
WHEREAS, on June 28,1995, the Snohomish County Council (the "County Council") first
adopted a capital facilities plan as required by the GMA, the 1995-2000 Capital Facilities Plan,
along with other mandatory elements of Snohomish County's GMACP; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, the County Council adopted the 2015 Comprehensive Plan
Update, which included reassessment and updates to the Land Use Element, Transportation
Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Capital Facilities Plan Element, Future Land Use Map,
and regulations and policies; and
WHEREAS, the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan Element ("2015 CFP") establishes minimum level
of service ("LOS") standards for those capital facilities necessary to support development and
provides an inventory of capital facilities and a forecast of future facility needs; and
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN -1
N
O
N
a+
c
a�
E
U
Q
Packet Pg. 208771
7.9.a
1
2 WHEREAS, the 2015 CFP Identifies the following public capital facilities as necessary to
3 support development: fire protection services, surface transportation, park land and recreational
4 facilities, surface water management, electric power, schools, public wastewater systems, and
5 public water supply; and
6
7 WHEREAS, Snohomish County Code (SCC) 4.26.024 requires the Snohomish County
8 Executive, on an annual basis, to prepare a six -year capital improvement program for the next six
9 fiscal years pursuant to the Snohomish County Charter (the "County Charter") and the GMA; and
10
11 WHEREAS, section 6.50 of the County Charter requires the County Council to adopt a six-
12 year CIP as an adjunct to the annual budget, including a balance of proposed expenses and
13 potential revenue sources; and
14
15 WHEREAS, the six -year CIP is the document developed by the County to detail the funding
16 sources for County capital projects over the next six years and assess whether funding sources
17 and regulatory mechanisms are sufficient to maintain the minimum LOS for those capital facilities
18 necessary to support development; and
19
20 WHEREAS, on November 12, 2019, the County adopted the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement
21 Program by Amended Ordinance 19-072, and has adopted regular updates to the capital
22 improvement program since 1995; and
23
24 WHEREAS, pursuant to the County Charter and the SCC, the County Council will review and
25 update its six -year CIP concurrently with the 2021 budget process; and
26
27 WHEREAS, on September 22, 2020, the Snohomish County Planning Commission (the
28 "Planning Commission") held a public hearing to consider the County's 2021-2026 Capital
29 Improvement Program ("2021-2026 CIP"); and
30
31 WHEREAS, on September 24, 2020, the Planning Commission sent a letter that stated that at
32 the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of
33 the 2021-2026 CIP; and
34
35 WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020, the County Council held a public hearing to consider the
36 Planning Commission's recommendations as well as public testimony on the 2021-2026 CIP; and
37
38 WHEREAS, the County Council considered the 2021-2026 CIP, which is attached as Exhibit A,
39 concurrently with the 2021 budget; and
40
41 WHEREAS, the County Council considered the entire hearing record including the Planning
42 Commission's recommendation and written and oral testimony submitted during the public
43 hearings;
44
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 2
N
O
N
a+
C
W
E
t
V
Q
Packet Pg. 209771
7.9.a
2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED:
3
4 Section 1. The County Council adopts the fallowing findings In support of this ordinance:
5
6 A. The foregoing recitals are adopted as findings as if set forth In full herein.
7
8 B. The ordinance adopts the County's 2021-2026 CIP.
9
10 C. The 2021-2026 CIP was developed for compliance with the following GMA requirements:
11
12 1. RCW 36.70A.070(3) "A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory
13 of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and
14 capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs for such capital
15 facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital
16 facilities; (d) at least a six -year plan that will finance such capital facilities within
17 projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such
18 purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element If probable
19 funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use
20 element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities
21 plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be
22 included in the capital facilities plan element." The 2021-2026 CIP includes a six-
23 year financing plan for all of the County's capital facilities. The 2021-2026 CIP also
24 assesses the adequacy of funding and regulatory mechanisms for those public
25 capital facilities necessary to support development to maintain their respective
26 minimum level of service (LOS).
27
28 2. GMA planning Goal 12 (RCW 36.70A.020(12)) "Public facilities and services.
29 Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development
30 shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available
31 for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
32 established minimum standards." The 2021-2026 CIP species proposed funding
33 sources for the planned capital facilities and contains a "statement of assessment"
34 which addresses the need for a reassessment of land use or other comprehensive
35 plan elements if there is a projected shortfall in revenue (between 2021 and 2026)
36 that causes the LOS for a facility classified as necessary to support development to
37 fall below the minimum level identified in the capital facilities plan. The statement of
38 assessment portion of the 2021-2026 CIP finds that there are no funding shortfalls
39 or regulatory inadequacies that would affect the ability to maintain the minimum LOS
40 for those capital facilities necessary to support development.
41
42 D. The 2021-2026 CIP was developed for consistency with Puget Sound Regional Council
43 Vision 2040 Multicounty Planning Policies (MPP) including: MPP-PS-2 "Time and phase
44 services and facilities to guide growth and development in a manner that supports the
45 regional vision.' The County's CFP and the 2021-2026 CIP align with the regional vision to
46 direct growth into urban areas where adequate public infrastructure and services are
47
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 3
N
O
04
W
E
U
Q
Packet Pg. 210
7.9.a
1 available or can be provided in an efficient manner by establishing minimum LOS for those
2 public capital facilities necessary to support development and by ensuring that adequate
3 funding and regulatory mechanisms are in place to maintain those minimum LOS.
4
5 E. The 2021-2026 CIP was developed for consistency with Snohomish County Countywide
6 Planning Policy (CPP) PS-13 "Jurisdictions should adopt capital facilities plans, and
7 coordinate with other service providers, to provide the appropriate level of service to
8 support planned growth and development in Urban Growth Areas.' The 2021-2026 CIP, a
9 component of the County's CFP, Is developed through a coordinated and collaborative
10 process between the County and non -County service providers of public capital facilities
11 such as schools, water and sewer Infrastructure and services, and electric power.
12
13 F. The 2021-2026 CIP was developed to comply with and Implement the following County
14 directives:
15
16 1. Section 6.50 of the County Charter "...The county council in considering the budget
17 ordinance proposed by the county executive, may delete or add items, may reduce
1s or increase the proposed appropriations and may add provisions restricting the
19 expenditure of certain appropriations, provided that the county council shall adopt a
20 six (6) year capital improvement program as an adjunct to the budget, including a
21 balance of proposed expenses and potential revenue sources." The County's
22 annual capital Improvement program, including the 2021-2026 CIP, is considered
23 and adopted as part of the annual budget.
24
25 2. SCC 4.26.024 "The executive shall on an annual basis prepare a capital
26 improvement program for the next six fiscal years pursuant to the county charter
27 and chapter 36.70A RCW" The County's annual capital improvement programs,
28 including the 2021-2026 CIP, are developed for compliance with state and local
29 requirements, and is considered and adopted as part of the annual budget.
30
31 3. GPP Objective CF 13 "Develop a six -year financing program for capital facilities
32 that meets the requirements of the GMA, achieves the county's levels -of -service
33 objectives for county roads and is within its financial capabtiities to carry out." The
34 2021-2026 CIP contains: 1) an adequate financing plan for all County capital
35 facilities, including those necessary to support development, 2) the minimum LOS
36 for those capital facilities necessary to support development, Including roads and
37 transit, and 3) a statement of assessment that finds adequate funding and
38 regulatory mechanisms in place to maintain the minimum LOS for those capital
39 facilities necessary to support development.
40
41 G. The 2021-2026 CIP will comply with and implement the following goals, objectives, and
42 policies of the GPP because it is developed In coordination with other providers of public
43 capital facilities and it provides: 1) a six -year financing plan for all County and non -County
44 capital facilities that Identifies the funding sources, projects, and schedule, and 2) an
45 assessment of the adequacy of funding and regulatory mechanisms for those public capital
46 facilities necessary to support development to maintain their established minimum LOS:
47
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 4
N
O
N
c
a�
E
Q
Packet Pg. 211
7.9.a
1
1.
TR Policy 7.A.5 "A locally and regionally coordinated six -year program shall be
2
prepared that finances transportation improvements within projected funding levels
3
and clearly Identifies sources of public money."
4
5
2.
PR Policy 3.A.1 "Apply a level -of -service method to: monitor the level -of -service of
6
park facilities necessary to support development; identify priority parks projects that
7
are necessary to support development; and provide a basis for collecting and
8
allocating park impact mitigation fees.*
9
10
3.
Objective CF 6.A "Update the six -year CIP to include a capital program to efficiently
11
provide quality work space for existing and projected future staffing levels through
12
the year 2035."
13
14
4.
CF Policy 1.B.1 "The county shall prepare and adopt, a six -year capital
15
improvement program (pursuant to County Charter) that identifies projects, outlines
16
a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all county capital projects."
17
18
5.
Goal CF 9 "Coordinate with non -county facility providers such as cities and special
19
purpose districts to support the future land use pattern Indicated by this plan."
20
21
6.
Objective CF 10.A "Assist school districts in developing capital facilities plans that
22
clearly depict levels of service and how they will serve existing and projected
23
student enrollments"
24
25
7.
Goal CF 11 "Water supply systems shall provide sufficient fire flow, as established
26
by county development regulations, in order to provide protection at a level of
27
service commensurate with the planned Intensity of future development adopted in
28
the comprehensive plan."
29
30
B.
Goal UT 2 "Work with provider agencies of Snohomish County to help ensure the
31
availability of a reliable, high quality water supply for all households and businesses
32
within the county in a manner that is consistent with the comprehensive plan and
33
protection of the natural environment."
34
35
9.
Goal UT 3 "Work with cities and special districts to produce coordinated wastewater
36
system plans for both Incorporated and unincorporated areas within UGAs that are
37
consistent with the land use element and city plans"
38
39
10. Goal UT 4 "Assist electric utility providers in fulfilling their public service obligations
40
through planning for adequate system capacity to accommodate forecasted growth
41
in a manner that is consistent with the comprehensive plan and protection of the
42
natural environment
43
44
H. Procedural requirements.
45
46
1.
The proposal is a Type 3 legislative action under SCC 30.73.010.
47
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20.071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 5
N
O
N
a+
c
W
E
U
Q
Packet Pg. 212
7.9.a
2 2. The environmental Impacts of this proposal are within the range of impacts analyzed
3 by the draft environmental Impact statement (DEIS) and final environmental Impact
4 statement (FEIS) during the update to the GMACP in 2015. No new probable
5 significant adverse environmental Impacts from this ordinance have been identified.
6 Therefore, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements with respect to this
7 non -project action have been met through Issuance on September 9, 2020, of
8 Addendum No. 21 to the FEIS for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update.
9
10 3. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A. 1 06(l), a notice of intent to adopt this ordinance was
11 received by the Washington State Department of Commerce ("Commerce") for
12 distribution to state agencies on August 31, 2020.
13
14 4. The public participation process used in the adoption of this ordinance has complied
15 with all applicable requirements of the GMA and the SCC.
16
W 5. The Washington State Attorney General last issued an advisory memorandum, as
18 required by RCW 36.70A.370, in September of 2018 entitled "Advisory
19 Memorandum and Recommended Process for Evaluating Proposed Regulatory or
20 Administrative Actions to Avoid Unconstitutional Takings of Private Property" to help
21 local governments avoid the unconstitutional taking of private property. The process
22 outlined in the State Attorney General's 2018 advisory memorandum was used by
23 Snohomish County In objectively evaluating the regulatory changes proposed by
24 this ordinance.
25
26 I. This ordinance is consistent with the record as set forth in PDS staff reports relating to this
27 proposal dated August 10, 2020, and September 9, 2020.
28
29 Section 2. The County Council makes the following conclusions:
30
31 A. The 2021-2026 CIP is consistent with and complies with the procedural and substantive
32 requirements of the GMA.
33
34 B. The 2021-2026 CIP is consistent with and implements the MPPs, CPPs, and GPP.
35
36 C. All SEPA requirements with respect to this non -project action have been satisfied.
37
38 D. This proposal does not result in an unconstitutional taking of private property for a public
39 purpose and does not violate substantive due process guarantees.
40
41 Section 3. The County Council bases its findings and conclusions on the entire record of the
42 Planning Commission and the County Councii, including all testimony and exhibits. Any finding
43 which should be deemed a conclusion, and any conclusion which should be deemed a finding, is
44 hereby adopted as such.
45
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 6
N
0
N
a+
c
W
E
U
a
Packet Pg. 213
7.9.a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Section 4. The 2021-2026 CIP, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference to this
ordinance, Is hereby adopted as the six year capital improvement program required by the GMA,
County Charter, MPPs, CPPs, SCC, and GPP based on the foregoing findings of fact and
conclusions.
Section 5. The 2021-2026 CIP adopted by this ordinance supersedes all other County capital
improvement programs. The 2021-2026 CIP shall control In the event of any inconsistency
between the 2021-2026 CIP and any other capital Improvement program adopted by the County
Section 6. Severability and Savings. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the Growth Management Hearings Board ("Board")
or a court of competent jurisdiction, such Invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Provided,
however, that if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is held to be invalid by
the Board or court of competent jurisdiction, then the section, sentence, clause or phrase in effect
prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be in full force and effect for that individual section,
sentence. clause or phrase as If this ordinance had never been adopted.
PASSEDthis 10th day of November, 2020.
ATTEST'
Tlk�,
Clerk of 1he Council
{ 9 APPROVED DATE:11123, 2020
{ ) VETOED
( ) EMERGENCY
ATTEST:
Appr ved as I form only:
�9
Dep ty Prosecuting Attorney
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.20-071
RELATING TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,
ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS PART OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - 7
SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL
Snohomish County, Washington
�L
Chairperson
Snohomish County Executive
D-18
N
O
N
d
E
s
ea
Q
Packet Pg. 214
7.9.a
AMENDMENTS to CIP #1 and 2
Ordinance No. 20-071
Adopting the 2021 2026 Capital Improvement Program as a Part of
Snohomish County's Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan
TITLE: Revisions to the proposed 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program
(herein "Proposed CIP") for consistency between the Proposed CIP
and Council's Proposed Amended 2021 Budget.
Brief Description: The following two (2) amendments provide for consistency between
the Proposed Amended 2021 Budget and the Proposed CIP:
AMENDMENT 1: Revise the narrative related to City Partnership Projects in
Community Parks with specific project list. Revisions involve the
narrative on pages 39-44 and the table on page 44 of the Proposed
CIP.
AMENDMENT 2: Revise the funding related to the SR 530 Memorial Project under
Regional Parks. Revisions involve the funding listed on page 24 as
well as the table on page 28.
N
O
N
a+
C
E
t
V
Q
Packet Pg. 215
7.9.a
AMENDMENT 1
Name: Revise the narrative in the CIP related to City Partnership Projects in Community
Parks
Brief Description: Revising the narrative related to City Partnership Projects in
Community Parks including a project list.
A. Revise the narrative on pages 39-44 of the Proposed CIP as follows:
ADD the following:
CITY OF ARLINGTON EVANS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS: Restore and repair the
backstop and bleachers
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $40,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF STANWOOD OLD PACIFIC HWY/102N13 AVE: SR 532 roundabout and bypass
for Old Pacific Hwy/ 102nd
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $25,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF GRANITE FALLS JIM HOLM PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Improvements to the
Basketball Court
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $25,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF ARLINGTON HALLER PARK: Veteran's memorial on the bridge J
N
Prior Year Balance: $0 N
2021: $25,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0 E
Project Start/End Date: 2021
a
Packet Pg. 216
7.9.a
CITY OF DARRINGTON: Improvements related to building of historic industry equipment
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $10,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF MARYSVILLE OLYMPIC VIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Development of
Olympia View Park
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $25,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF MUKILTEO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: Improvements to the 76'h Street bike and
pedestrian paths
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $40,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF EVERETT WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS: Improvements to the Silver Lake
Walk Way
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $80,000 (REST 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
COUNCIL DISTRICT 2: City Partnership Project
Prior Year Balance: $0 J
2021: $30,000 (BEET 2) —
Future Years: $0 0
N
a+
Project Start/End Date: 2021
E
CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Funding towards various projects, a
including the addition of a gathering plaza with a water feature, a walking path around the
Packet Pg. 7
7.9.a
perimeter, a multi -use sport court and exercise equipment, a picnic area, and restroom. Project
is in partnership with the City of Edmonds.
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $150,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF MILL CREEK SILVER CREST PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Improvements to
include basketball court repair, irrigation, fence repair and replacement of benches and picnic
tables
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $100,000 (BEET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE BICENTENNIAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS:
Playground equipment at Bicentennial Park
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $50,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF SULTAN OSPREY PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Improvements to play structure
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $25,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF SNOHOMISH AVERILL FIELD PARK IMPROVEMENTS: upgrades to park
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $30,000 (REET 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF LAKE STEVENS FRONTIER HEIGHTS PARK: upgrades to park
Q
Packet Pg. 218
7.9.a
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $20,000 (REST 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF MONROE: Structural Improvements to Monroe Senior Center
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $25,000 (REST l )
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
CITY OF LAKE STEVENS TRAIL: 1.3 mile trail connection between Lake Stevens and
Centennial Trail
Prior Year Balance: $0
2021: $50,000 (REST 2)
Future Years: $0
Project Start/End Date: 2021
B. Revise the table on page 44 of the Proposed CIP to be consistent with the
following information:
Packet Pg. 219
7.9.a
CIP - CaD)tal•
Fund SubFund
Division
Program
322 001 Parks Construction Fund MParks And Recreation - Ad 144
CemmunLty
Object
2021
2022 2023
2024
2025
2026
Capltaloutlays
$444.964
$570,000
S670,000
$1.070,000
S70,000
S70.000
Program Subtotal:
$444,964
SS70,000 $670,000
61.070.000
$70.000
S70.000
jn IM Parks Construction
Fagg 2UParks
And Recreation - Ad 264
Community
Object
2021
20I2 2023
2024
2025
2026
Program Subtotal: 1 5373.4S4 1 s0 L 50 I SO so I SO
309 Parks Construction Fund MParka And Recreation - 94J Reabnel Q42 City Perks
Object 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
es: Thru Funds $750,000 SO SO SO s0 50
Program Subtotal S750,000 SO 50 SO 50 SO
P.Lher
Oblact
2021
20.12
2023
2074
2025
2026
Priot Year Funds
S19,673,701
SO
50
SO
SO
SO
Future Year Funds
50
51.101,000
S901.000 I
S7767600
$2.171.400
52.701,000
Program Subtotal-
519,873.701
$1.101,000
5901.000
5776600
52,271.400
52.701.000
CIP•Capital Totals-
S21.442.119
$1.671.000
S1,571,000
$1,a46.600
S2,241,400
S2.771,000
CIP - Fundinit Source:
Fundina Source 2021 2022 2101211 1112A MIS In7a
EET 11 1 155,000)
SO
SO
5275.600 S570 400
S1.000,000
EET I 1 525.000
Prior Year Funds $19,973.7131
SO
SO
$0
SO
s0
ark_sMitigation S1,174.964
S1.671,000
S1,571,000
S1,571,000
$1.671.000
$1.771.000
therFundsS373,454
SO
So
SO
SO
So
Funding Sources Total: S21."2.119
31.671,000
$1,571,000
S1,646.600
52,2dl.d00
$2.T71.000
C. Amend all related text and summary tables in the final ordinance attachment,
Exhibit A, to reflect the changes made by this amendment.
Council Disposition:
Date:
Q
J_
C:
7
O
U
L
N
E
O
t
O
C:
to
a—
N
O
N
C:
C:
7
U-
R
I1
U
O
a—
r
O
O
N
O
N
s�
C
C
7
U-
w
w
s_
c�
IL
U
w
O
U
O
U
O
c
to
Q
J
s—
N
O
N
C:
01
E
t
t)
r
Q
Packet Pg. 220
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT B
Priority Package Details
Packet Pg. 221
7.9.a
Snohomish County 2021 Budget - Council Adopted 11/10/2020
Priority Package Detail
Priority: Department: 09 Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Short Name: Revenue Only - City/Council Partnerships Package ID t#: 606
Special Factor: Percent of Package Driven by Factor:
Description: This is a mvenue only package providing S750,000 in funding for City/Council Partnership Projects.
S 150,D00 per Council District. Scc corresponding PP: 608 and 607
Justification:
SUMMARY EXPENDITURE/REVENUE/FTE BY FUND:
Revenues Summary
FUND 309 $750.000
TOTAL - REVENUES $760,000
EXPENDITURE/NEW REVENUE DETAH,:
NEW Revenue:
Distrtbullon Code
Description/Explanallon
Amount
309 31 D985449901
OpT-REET 1
$25.000
309 310985449902
OpT Parks Projects -REST 2
$725,000
1y� 1101 Parks Construction
Fun LU Par ts_And Recreation ,94 Community
$750,000
FUND309 SIB TOTAL - PRIORITY PACKAGE
REVENUES: $750.000
GRANO TOTAL. - PRIORITY PACKAGE "NEW
REVENUES': $750,000
Priority ID# 606
Page 36
Monday, Dccanber21. 2020
Packet Pg. 222
7.9.a
Snohomish County 2021 Budget - Council Adopted 11/10/2020
Priority Package Detail
Priority: Department: 09 Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Sbart Narne: Funds for City/Council Partnerships Packaee M H: 608
Special Factor: Percept or Packaee Driven by Factor:
Description: This is a CIP package to add S750,000 for City/Council Partnership Projects. The total amount for the 2020
CIP and 2020 Budget year will be S750,000, or S 150,000 per Council District. Please refer to Revenue PP
#606 for revenue detail. This package is in addition to package "Parks 309-Community Parks".
Justitication-
SMINIARY EXPENDITURE/REVENUE/FTE BY FUND
EXPENDiTUREMEW REVENUE DETAIL:
CIP - Capital:
Fund; SubFund Division:
Program
29 001 Parks Construction M9 Parks
And Recreation -
4444 Communily
Category:
2021
2022
2023
309.51094403316501 City Parks-REET1-Constr
$25.000
s0
s0
309.51094403326501 City Parks•REET2-Consir
$725,000
so
so
Program Totals•
S750,000
s0
s0
GRIND TOTAL. - CIP 1=XPENDIITURES:
$750,000
$0
s0
CIP - Funding Source:
Funding Source
2021
2022
2023
REET 1
$25.000
so
so
REST II
S725 000
So
s0
GRAND TOTAL -CIP REVENUES:
$750,000
s0
$o
Prlorfry ID# 608
Page 37
SubProgram
0M City Parks Qand
2024 2025
s0 So
so s0
so $0
$0 $0
2024 2025
51) $0
5o So
$0 so
Monday, December 21, 2020
2026
so
s0
so
s0
2026
so
so
$o
a
J
C
0
tU
t
An
E
0
t
0
c
co
r
N
0
N
ar
c
c
0
u-
0
a
U
0
C6
0
N
0
N
ar
C
C
0
u-
H
W
W
w
IL
U
w
0
U
0
C)
0
c
t'n
Q
J
N
0
N
C
N
E
t
t)
r
Q
Packet Pg. 223
7.9.a
Snohomish County 2021 Budget - Council Adopted 11/10/2020
Priority Package Detail
Priority: Deportment: 16 Nondepartmental
Short Name: Allocating funds to City/Council Partnerships Packnee TD #: 607
Special Factor: Percent of Packaee Driven by Factor.
Description: Adding S750,000, or $150,000 per Council District for City/Council Partnership Projects. Sec corresponding
PPh's 606 and 608
Justification:
SUMMARY EXPENDITURE/REVENUE/FTE BY FUND:
Expenditures Package Summary avenues summary
FUND 191 $750,000 FUND 191 $750.000
TOTAL - EXPENDITURES $750,000 TOTAL. - REVENUES S7S0.00n
EXPENDITI<1RE/MEW REVENUE DETAIL:
Expenditures:
0lstrlbullon coda DeeatplloNEWanatlon Amount
191.5169905514 OpT-Park Projects $25.000
1M1 M 1st Qtr % REET Sb 497Z CraoiW lmcr M 18 4072 — REET 1 $25,000
191.5167005514 OpT-Park Projects $725,000
JZM 2nd Qtr % R19 T IESH M Shb 2929 Capltal Imp 700 SHB 2929 — REET 2 $725.000
FUND 101 SUS TOTAL - PRIORITY PACKAGE EXPENDITURES: $750,000
STRAND TOTAL -PRIORITY PACKAGE EXPENDITURES: 5750.000
NEW Revenue:
Distribution Code Description/Eaplanellon Amount
191.3169900800 Fund Balance $25,000
1U RU 111 Qtr % RLETS.'M2ypttal Imor = $13 4872 — REET 1 $2S,000
191.3157000t100 Fund Balance $725,000
191 002 2nd Qtr % REL=T tESH9 2 051 ft ?029 Ceplral iMa, ZO SH8 2#7 -�E 2 $725,000
FUND],$ SUB TOTAL -PR1oR1TY PACKAGE REVENUES: $750,000
GRAND TOTAL. - PRIORITY PACKAGE "NON REVENUES": 1750,000
Prtariry IDN 607 Page 49 Monday, December 21, 2020
Packet Pg. 224
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT C
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR COUNTY FUNDS
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS
FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 11 of 14
N
O
N
C
E
t
V
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 225
7.9.a
City of Edmonds Snohomish County Funding Request
September 2018
The City of Edmonds seeks to partner with Snohomish County to create a downtown signature
park, a community gathering area for this generation and generations to follow, at the recently
acquired Civic Park. This request is for $1M to help support a $12M total investment for the
Edmonds community. The City realizes this is a large request, and would like to work with the
County to try to make this a reality. The City is also flexible in receiving these funds over
multiple years ( i.e. 2019, 2020, and 2021).
This opportunity is a chance to create a legacy. Civic Center Park is an eight acre park in the
heart of downtown Edmonds that straddles the boundary between residences, civic amenities
and the downtown commercial district. Well -loved and used by residents of all ages, it is home
to the Boys and Girls Club, the Petanque Club, athletic fields, a playground, a skatepark, tennis
courts and several of Edmonds largest annual festivals such as the Taste of Edmonds and the
4th of July Fireworks. The redevelopment of this site will upgrade these amenities, and add a
gathering plaza area with a water feature, walking path around the perimeter, multi use sport
court and exercise equipment, a picnic area, restroom, and a welcoming civic edge, bringing a
sense of community to what currently exists as a somewhat fragmented area.
Originally the Edmonds High School sports facility in the 1930's, the site has served as a
recreational and event space for decades while the population of Edmonds has continued to
grow and develop around it. The City has been operating and maintaining the property for
public use since 1975, with no investment of capital funds and little change to the layout since
its former use by Edmonds High School. In the 2014 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
(PROS Plan), Civic Center Park was identified as a key asset and securing the park, that had been
leased from the Edmonds School District for 40 years, was deemed a priority. In direct
response, the City of Edmonds acquired the property in the fall of 2015 with grant assistance
from the Washington State Recreation Conservation Office and the Snohomish Conservation
Futures Program, thereby ensuring that the site will remain accessible to the community,
providing both passive and active recreation, and creating a community hub.
Urban parks serve as critical public places for recreation and civic engagement, essential to
quality of life in city centers. Parks help provide solutions to a myriad of community interests:
providing healthy places to exercise, creating a sense of community, hosting large events and
festivals, managing stormwater runoff and helping clean the air, catalyzing economic and
community development, and providing safe, close to home recreation options.
N
Parks play a vital role in a community; from gathering areas, nature trails, places for physical N
activity and festivals, they provide opportunities for increased quality of life. They also provide
valuable health benefits to communities. Nearly 40 years of research evidence confirms that E
nearby nature, including parks, gardens, urban forests and green spaces support human health a
and wellness (www. reenhealth.washin ton.edu). Key downtown parks have the potential to Q
Packet Pg. 226
7.9.a
function as a nucleus of neighborhood and city activity, where residents can gather for social
events, recreational activities, and meetings about community issues, increasing social
interaction and creating a sense of place.
The City of Edmonds elected officials and citizens had the foresight to focus on this priority,
namely acquiring and planning Civic Park. This gem in downtown Edmonds is prime for a
signature park, a legacy, for current and future generations. It is unique that such an old city,
steeped in history, built out to the seams has an opportunity to create an 8 acre park in the
downtown core. One could liken this opportunity to the Olmsted vision, including Central Park
in New York, parks all over Boston, and key signature parks in Seattle. This property was
identified in the comprehensive plan in the 1970's. The goal: acquire this land and create a
downtown park. Today, this goal is closer to reality. This park development has the potential
to represent a standard of excellence for the community, region, and country.
Over the past year, thousands of Edmonds residents, the Mayor, the Planning Board and City
Council have all been part of a robust community conversation about what this park could be
for Edmonds. The City Council adopted a final master plan for the park in February of 2017.
The adopted plan includes both active and passive spaces, areas for community events and
festivals, walking paths, meandering paths and connections to the downtown, large grassy open
field for sports or drop in gathering areas, a skate park, petanque courts, play area, tennis court
and a multi -use sport court and picnic area. This adopted plan and the future park will improve
the sense of community in Edmonds. It will be used as a hub, a community gathering area, a
place to connect for both young and old.
This centrally located downtown site is a valued asset in this community. On any given day or
evening, one can see upward of 100 people enjoying the park. I recently wandered over to
Civic Park just to feel the ambiance. I stood there and heard kids laughing, coaches teaching,
mom's encouraging their young ones, elders cheering when there was a good shot on the
petanque courts, teens breathing hard as they sprinted around the track, girls giving praise to
their soccer teammates, skateboards gliding over the cement surfaces, parents gathered in
chairs talking as they watch their kids playing flag football. I can only imagine what this park
will bring with its redevelopment and added amenities and the creation of a sense of place.
President Lyndon B Johnson once said, " If future generations are to remember us with
gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them something more than the miracles of o
technology. We must leave them a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just cn
after we got through with it." This park will honor the legacy that was left by Hazel Miller. It J
will leave an indelible mark on this community.
N
O
N
Packet Pg. 227
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT D
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS
FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 12 of 14
N
O
N
C
E
t
V
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 228
7.9.a
Civic Park
Downtown Edmonds
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Park is an eight acre park in the heart of downtown Edmonds
that straddles the boundary between residences, civic amenities and the downtown commercial district. w'ell-
loved and used by residents of all ages, it is home to the Boys and Girls Club, the Petanque Club, athletic fields,
a playground, a skatepark, tennis courts and several of Edmonds largest annual festivals such as the Taste of Ed-
monds and the 4th of July Fireworks. The redevelopment of this site will upgrade these amenities, and add a
gathering plaza area with a water feature, walking path around the perimeter, multi use sport court. and exercise
equipment, a picnic area, restroom, and a welcoming civic edge, bringing a sense of community to what current-
ly exists as a somewhat fragmented area.
PIJRIPOSEAFED:
This park redevelopment will play
a vital role in a community; -From
offering gathering areas, nature
trails, places for physical activity
and festivals. it will provide op-
portunities for increased quality of
life. It will have a direct economic
impact to downtown Edmonds, as
it will attract thousands of visitors
each year and is in close proximity
to retail imd restaurants.
r__M
To date. the City of Edmonds has invested approxi-
mately $1.5 million into the purchase, master plan
and early design for the project.
The City- of h;dmonds is aggressively seeking funds
from public. private and the city Is capital funds. To
date approximately $5 million of the estimated $12
million has heen raised.
N
O
04
a�
E
z
U
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 229
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT E
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND PROOF OF CITY OWNERSHIP OF
PROPERTY
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS
FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 13 of 14
N
O
N
C
E
t
V
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 230
RECEIVED
It `q 7.9.a
MAR 16 2016
Return Address
1-21 Y\fV . 4-
rx==iUMcf ?D
Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein):
1. Statutory Warranty Deed
ql MI IIII'#I IA Itl GII NI tll IIN HII III VII II
NGTON
� 0 � T c z z
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: N/A
(on page _ of documents(s))
Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials):
1. Edmonds School District No. 15 W 9—&)0M%Sh 0DJ"
2. Additional names on page — of document.
Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials):
1. City of Edmonds
2. Additional names on page _, of document.
Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range)
Lots 1-20, Blk 99, Lots 1-40, Blk 100 and Lots 21-40, Blk 101, City of Edmonds, V 2, P 39-39A,
records of Snohomish County
Full legal is on page 3_ of document.
Assessor's Property Tax ParceVAccount Numbers
004342-099-001-00
004342-100-000-00
004342-101-021-00
00358-0859/129513952.1
N
O
N
a:
C
N
E
t
V
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 231
7.9.a
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
Grantor, EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15fa Washington municipal corporation, for
and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10) in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and warrants to THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a
Washington municipal corporation, that certain real property located in the City of Edmonds,
Snohomish County, Washington, more particularly described on EXHIBIT A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, subject to the matters shown on EXHIBIT B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Dated this 3r—day of �' , 2016.
+�cR-Or'c CAS a Grantor:
EDMONDS SCHOO STRICT NO. 15
By:
Nick JrAssoit, Sup&ntendent
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
1 - V
00358-0859/129513952.1
Q
Packet Pg. 232
7.9.a
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OFa h .,, ;� )
On this Sr! day of2016, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Nick Brossoit,
to me known to be the person who signed as Superintendent of EDMONDS SCHOOL
DISTRICT NO. 15, the municipal corporation that executed the within and Foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he
was duly elected, qualified and acting as said Superintendent of the municipal corporation and
that he was authorized to execute said instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year
first above written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
R'��aiatv;'r[; NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State
�.p`��` of Washington, residing at 6 n'
r $ k %ai% My appointment expires:
PUIBL1G
OF
-2-
00358-0859/129513952,1
N
O
N
C
E
t
c.�
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 233
7.9.a
E7i®1T A TO DEED
Led Description
Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, Block 99, Lots 1 through 40, inclusive, Block 100, and
Lots 21 through 40, inclusive, Block 101, City of Edmonds, according to the Plat thereof
recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, pages 39 and 39A, records of Snohomish County,
Washington.
_3_
00358-0859/129513952.1
T
N
O
N
C
GN
E
M
U
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 234
7.9.a
EXHIBIT B TO DEED
Title Exceptions
1. Matters which would be disclosed by an inspection and/or survey of the property.
-4-
00358-0859/129513952.1
N
O
N
C
E
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 235
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT F
CITY'S ROLE IN THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE,
AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECT
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS
FOR CIVIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 14 of 14
T
N
O
N
C
GN
E
t
u
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 236
7.9.a
CITY OF EDMOND S
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-672-5750
Websile: www.edmondswa.gov
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Department
DAVE EARLING
MAYOR
ATTACHMENT F — CITY'S ROLE IN PLANNING/DESIGN/MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS OF THE PROJECT
This attachment is to acknowledge that the City of Edmonds will work with the local community in the planning
and design of Civic Park development. Once designed and constructed, the City of Edmonds will take
responsibility in the maintenance and operations of Civic Park.
Sincerely,
Carrie S. Hite
City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Director
700 Main Street
Edmonds, Washington 98020
T
N
O
N
C
4)
E
t
U
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 237
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT G
Proof of Insurance
Packet Pg. 238
Insurance Authority P.O. Box 88030
Tukwila, WA 98138
Phone: 206-575-6046
Fax: 206-575-7426
www.wciapool.org
9/15/2021 ROM 13496
Snohomish County Department of Conservation & Natural Resources
Attn: Tom Teigen
6705 Puget Park Drive
Snohomish, WA 98296
Re: City of Edmonds
ILA for Civic Parks Improvements
Evidence of Coverage
The City of Edmonds is a member of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), which
is a self -insured pool of over 160 public entities in the State of Washington.
WCIA has at least $4 million per occurrence limit of liability coverage in its self -insured layer that
may be applicable in the event an incident occurs that is deemed to be attributed to the
negligence of the member. Liability coverage includes general liability, automobile liability, stop-
gap coverage, errors or omissions liability, employee benefits liability and employment practices
liability coverage.
WCIA provides contractual liability coverage to the City of Edmonds. The contractual liability
coverage provides that WCIA shall pay on behalf of the City of Edmonds all sums which the
member shall be obligated to pay by reason of liability assumed under contract by the member
WCIA was created by an interlocal agreement among public entities and liability is self -funded
by the membership. As there is no insurance policy involved and WCIA is not an insurance
company, your organization cannot be named as an additional insured.
Sincerely,
Rob Roscoe
Deputy Director
cc: Jessica Neill Hoyson
Angie Feser
N
0
N
as
E
M
U
2
r
a
Packet Pg. 239
7.9.a
ATTACHMENT H
Relevant portions of the City's Capital Facilities Plan
including property and project and relevant portions of the City's
budget regarding the project
Packet Pg. 240
7.9.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021-2041
EDP
z
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
2
r
Q
Packet Pg. 241
7.§.a
k\7\ 2
k
c'! \ §
&
&
\[))!-
f/ -
))k
° "
k/
}\)f
�2 `)
\����`
(°
a.
o
\ /)
o
}
(L
a./
)I
�e<�6
\m)]c
j
o
=
\k
/\co
\
}\\o (\
\\
o\
_f§(
e.
,_
\fƒB
-o
\0E
-:
!m-a
_��
±§
\_
o
Im
|
2
)
m
)\
«E
a.
a.
\k
))
:
o
!
() a.
_ «
Lu
w(D9
}
{
£!
CD
04
£
§
/
Q
5
Packet Pg.24
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Playfield
310 6ch Ave. N, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits.
8 acres; zoned Playgrounds & Athletic Areas
ESTIMATED COST: $12,057,528
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An 8-acre downtown park development supported by $3.47M in grant
funding; $3.7M in bonds and $5.1 M in carryforward funds from previous years. This signature project is
slated to go to bid in early 2021 with ground breaking scheduled for second quarter of 2021. This project
is expected to take 16 months to complete (8 months in 2021 and 8 months in 2022). Remaining annual
expenditures are estimated at $6.03M in 2021 and $6.03M in 2022. Three funds are utilized: Fund 125,
Fund 126 and Fund 332.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
This is a multi -year design, land acquisition, fund development and construction project that is a very
high priority in the PROS plan. With $3.47M in grant funding to support the effort. The Master Plan
process was robust with extensive community input. The design is complete, permits are approved and
the project is ready to enter the construction phase.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Professional
$67,620
Service
Engineering
$45,833
$45,832
Construction
$5,872,862
$5,937,381
1 % Art
$44,000
$44,000
TOTAL
$6,030,315
$6,027,213
N
O
N
c
as
E
Q
Packet Pg. 243
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED COST: $6-8 M
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District,
community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon
successful regional capital campaign. $10M - $12M project for all 3 phases.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under
maintained facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing
controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly
urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by
user fees. Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the
future for an additional $6-8M.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-
2039
Planning/Study
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$6-8M
T
N
O
N
C
GN
U
M
a
all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
E:3
Packet Pg. 244
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
7.9.a
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities Maintenance & ESTIMATED COST: $3 - $4M
Operations Building
Existing Building Outline
Yard Fu
.��� M111
ILI
Lading r New One St Building
1, Da sf 5MO Sf
o i�nveay — 15,8gQ�
Yard Functlons � 11,101f I I I j
Perimeler zone — 4,200 sf
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40+ year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching
the end of its useful life and needs major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes. 2021 - 2019
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-2039
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3m - $4m
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
9 1 Packet Pg. 245
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park Improvements — sub ESTIMATED COST: $5M
component of Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow
Creek Davliahtina)
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, within Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5-acre regional park; Zoned Commercial Waterfront, Marina Beach south purchased with federal
transportation funds. WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; protected through Deed -of -Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redefine the park to better serve the community as it accommodates the
new alignment of Willow Creek. The project will include parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn
areas, potential concession areas, restrooms, upgraded play area, upgraded benches, picnic tables and
BBQ's, improved ADA accessibility, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges connecting the
park across Willow Creek, personal watercraft staging and launching area, bicycle racks, fencing, and
retaining the existing beach/ driftwood area and off leash area. The Marina Beach Master Plan includes
daylighting Willow Creek which requires removal of a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's and
is the only exchange between the Puget Sound and our Freshwater Edmonds Marsh Estuary. Two funds
utilized: Fund 125 and Fund 332. Fund 332 includes park impact fees, donations and grants.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Marina Beach Park is a highly used regional park. Through the
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Action Plan and the Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space (PROS) Plan the community identified the need to restore the adjacent Edmonds Marsh, re-
established for salmon habitat. Improvements are intended to retain this site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system. Importantly, the project is intended to address sea level rise and will promote
recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and
utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2026
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Planning and
Design
$250,000
$250,000
Engineering
Construction
$1,750,000
$2,750,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1
$250,000
$250,000
$1,750,000
$2,750,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
10 1 Packet Pg. 246
7.10
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Waterfront Redevelopment Project - EWorks Landscape Contract Amendment #4
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Background/History
On August 5, 2019 City Council approved Contract Amendment No. 3 with Environmental Works for
construction administration on the Waterfront Redevelopment Project. Contract Amendment No. 3 was
for a not to exceed amount of $178,465. In August 2020 Environmental Works informed the City that
they may overrun the budget for construction administration. Over the course of many months a
contract amendment totaling $145,506.95 was negotiated with Environmental Works for these
additional construction administration services. These negotiations reduced Environmental Work's
earlier proposal by a total of $16,879 resulting in a cost savings from Amendment No. 3.
Amendment No. 4 is Attachment #1 and the original Professional Services Agreement plus the three
additional amendments are attached as well for reference.
Staff Recommendation
Council review and approve the amendment authorizing the Mayor to sign Contract Amendment No. 4
to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Works for a total of $145,506.95.
Narrative
The construction of the Waterfront Redevelopment Project presented may challenges including
contaminated soil, archeological discoveries, saltwater inundation of concrete footings and the removal
and replacement of significant amounts of unsuitable materials under both sets of new concrete beach
stairs. Separate construction contracts for the building and site work required considerable
coordination. As a result Environmental Works, the landscape contractor, and their team of consultants
exceeded their scope of work by responding to fifteen additional Requests for Information, nine
additional Requests for Change Proposals and thirty-three additional review hours for submittals. The
technical challenges and a construction duration that lasted three months longer than anticipated
resulted in a significant increase in team coordination, telephone conversations, site visits and project
closeout efforts.
Contract Amendment No. 4 with Environmental Works costs are covered by existing project funding.
Physical completion for the project was reached on February 2, 2021 and a budget surplus of
approximately $8,500 still remains due to the negotiated reduction from Amendment No. 3 to
Amendment No. 4.
Attachments:
Packet Pg. 247
7.10
EWorks Professional Services Amendment No. 4 with Exhibit
Barker Landscape Waterfront PSA fully executed
2019.01.07 Amendment No. 1 to PSA-Barker EWorks
Amendment No. 2 to Environmental Works Professional Services Agreement 2.19.19
2019.08.08 EW Amendment No 3 to PSA dated 5-3-17 b
Packet Pg. 248
4.
CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON
121 5T" AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR +,
Website: www.edmondswa.gov
L
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0
Engineering Division m
AMENDMENT NO.4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Waterfront Redevelopment Project
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and
Environmental Works (formerly Barker Landscape Architects, P.S.), hereinafter referred to as
the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting
services with respect to a project known as Waterfront Redevelopment Project, dated May 3,
2017 ("Underlying Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreements authorizes the City to engage the Consultant to
perform additional services on the Project through a written amendment signed by both parties in
which the Scope of Work is expanded and any additional fees are addressed; and
WHEREAS, the parties have amended the Underlying Agreement on three previous
occasions (Amendment No. 1, dated December 20, 2018; Amendment No. 2, dated February 21,
2019, and Amendment No. 3, dated August 5, 2019); and
WHEREAS, additional tasks to the Scope of Work have been identified with regard to
providing Construction Phase Support and the parties desire to amend the Underlying Agreement
to further revise the Scope of Work and amend the Underlying Agreement's payment provisions;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by
and between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Underlying Agreement of May 3, 2017 between the parties, as amended by
Amendments 1-3, all of which are incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is
further amended in, but only in, the following respects:
1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the Underlying
Agreement, as previously amended, shall be further amended to include the additional services
and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A
incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
1.2 The $568,537.00 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the Underlying
Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, which was increased by
Amendment No. 2 to include an additional not to exceed amount of $118,820.00 for the
additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to Amendment No. 2, and which was increased
Packet Pg. 249
7.10.a
by Amendment No. 3 to include an additional not to exceed amount of $178,465.00 for the
additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to Amendment No. 3, is hereby amended to
include an additional not to exceed amount of $145,506.95 for the additional scope of work
identified in Exhibit A to this Amendment No. 4. As a result of this Amendment No. 4, the total
contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $1,011,328.95 ($568,537.00
plus $118,820.00 plus $178,465.00 plus $145,506.95).
In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full
force and effect, amended as set forth in Amendments 1-4, but only as set forth therein.
DONE this
CITY OF EDMONDS
Michael Nelson, Mayor
day of , 2021.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
Printed Name:
Title:
On this day of , 2021, before me, the under -signed, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
, to me known to be the of the
corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be
Packet Pg. 250
7.10.a
the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the
seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
\\EDMSVR-DEPTFS\Engineering\Capital\CAPITAL PROJECTS\E7MA Waterfront Redevelopment\Construction\600 Bids & Contracts\630 Contracts\EWorks\EWorks Professio
Services Amendment No. 4 with Exhibit.pdf Packet Pg. 251
EXHIBIT A
7.10.a
City of Edmonds ��0FEDI,
Construction Administration Services for Edmonds Waterfront Environmental Works
Redevelopment COMMUNITY DESIGN CENTER
�„c iR90
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
prepared by Environmental Works
40215th Avenue East, Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 329-8300 fax (206) 239-5494 nmorin@eworks.org
Assumptions of Original Scope:
Eight (8) month construction period, with a potential 2 month break from December 2019 to January 2020
Consultant Team will only be needed every other week for the second half of construction
Exclusions of Original Scope:
Daily on -site monitoring of the Contractor's work; Engineering analysis and design services for inspection; Review of pay requests/ intent to
pay prevailing wages, and other Contractor financial forms; Preliminary coordinatinon w/ Contractor; Processing of contract documents;
Tracking contractor's progress; Preparation of meeting minutes; Design modifications during construction; Site visit to review TESC
compliance; Preparing materials for and attending public meetings; Coordination or execution of any permitting related monitoring and
reporting; Services related to environmental monitoring and permitting; Services related to the Waterfront Overwater Walkway; Warranty
period backcheck and correction list for engineering related elements
Last updated:07.29.2021
Highlighted items = Additional Services Reid Middleton Glumac
Breakdown of work by personnel in hours Orig. Scoped hours Orig. Scoped fee Added fee Orig. Scoped fee Added fee Orig. Scoped fee Added fee Orig. Scoped Subtotal Total Added fee
A. Construction Phase Support Actual Scope
General internal project management and administration 42 weeks 48 $5,360.00 $16,532.67 $7,888.10 $9,963.53 $13,248.10 $26,496.20
Team Coordination &Telephone meetings (assumes 2 hrs/week over six (6) active project months or 26 weeks) 42 weeks 78 $9,040.00 $15,268.56 $12,842.50 $25,685.00 $21,882.50 $40,953.56
Pre -construction meeting (1 visit) 3x 6 $690.00 $1,035.00 $2,904.00 $1,452.00 $3,594.00 $2,487.00
Review of technical submittals for landscape elements 93 hrs 60 $6,400.00 $5,420.16 $6,400.00 $5,420.16
Review of technical submittals for engineering 1.0 5 $650.00 $23,430.00 $24,080.00
Answer up to thirty (30) Requests for Information (RFIs) 45 RFIs 42 $4,320.00 $2,160.00 $8,552.50 $12,828.75 $12,872.50 $14,988.75
Assist the City of Edmonds responding up to (5) change order proposals 14 RCPs 22 $2,560.00 $3,788.80 $10,964.80 $2,432.19 $13,524.80 $6,220.99
Weekly construction coordination meetings (8) visits over an eight month period 11 mos., 42 CA Cs, 20 $2,600.00 $10,400.00 $7,634.00 $7,634.00 $10,234.00 $18,034.00
20 Site visits
Site visits Waterfront (3) 4.0 6 $780.00 $257.40 $2,827.00 $932.91 $3,607.00 $1,190.31
Site visits Civil (3) 7.0 6 $780.00 $1,037.40 $3,025.00 $4,023.25 $3,805.00 $5,060.65
Maintain an updated construction plan set 1.0 60 $6,300.00 $5,350.40 $11,650.40
Punchlist & Final walkthrough for all landscape -related items (1 visit + Notes) NOT INCLUDED 1.0 12 $1,380.00 $1,380.00
Punchlist & final walkthrough of parking lot (1 visit + Notes) 1.0 4 $520.00 $1,848.00 $2,368.00
Punchlist & final walkthrough of waterfront (1 visit + Notes) 1.0 6 $780.00 $1,584.00 $25364.00
Preparation of As -Built drawings 1.0 48 $4,640.00 $2,691.20 $5,117.20 $3,445.18 $9,757.20 $6,136.38
Project Closeout 1.0 48 $4,640.00 $10,671.00 $2,832.50 $7,314.45 $7,472.50 $17,985.45
Construction Admin support from Electrical Engineer 1.0 6 $690.00 $7,150.00 $533.50 $7,840.00 $533.50
construction Admin support and uoordinatlon wars I earn Artist P1.0 8 $980.00 $2,980.00
subtotal 485 $53,110.00 $69,262.19 $96,800 $75,711.26 $7,150.00 $533.50 $159,060.00 $145,506.95
Environmental Works
Reid Middleton Glumac
TOTAL -ALL CONSTRUCTION ADMIN WORK $159,060
2% (below AIA std) for direct expenses for printing, mileage, postage, etc. $3,181
PROPOSED DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT $162,241
10% Management Reserve for unforeseen work $16,224
TOTAL ORIGINAL DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT $178,465
TOTAL REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
$145, 506.95
Packet Pg. 252
7.10.b
0�'
k CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARLING
l.1 P
700 Main Street • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • 425-771-0320 • FAX 425-771-0253 MAYOR
Websfte: www.edmondswe gov
AU i� o
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into between the City of
Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Barker Landscape Architects, P.S.,
hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant".
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide landscape design and engineering services with respect to the
Edmonds Waterfront Restoration project and waterfront connection;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of
Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be
on a time and expense basis as set forth on the Fee Schedule that is marked as Exhibit B,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; provided, in no event shall the
payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of FIVE HUNDRED
SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN DOLLARS $ 568,537.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the
progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that
has not been submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late
vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment
cycle.
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final
payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
1
Packet Pg. 253
7.10.b
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data
and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the
services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the
Consultant, provided, however, that:
A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant
shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and
shall at that date become the property of the City.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review
and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this
agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and
release under Chapter 42.56 RCW.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the
event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination,
shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be
prepared at no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this
Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals.
5. Indemnification 1 Hold harmless a reement. The Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any
and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts,
errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries
and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction
determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for
damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting
from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees,
and volunteers, the Consultant's liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall
be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including
RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers.
The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's
own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense,
the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title
51 RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and
keep in force during the term of this Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following
insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner
pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Packet Pg. 254
7.10.b
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not
less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property
damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million
dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one
million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by
the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant
shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the
Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State
of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the
City.
The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under
this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third
parties be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
sexual orientation, marifal status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the
United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any
other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
8. Consultant is an independent Contractor,. The parties intend that an
independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or
representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of
the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents,
employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement.
9. City aporoval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's
status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement
must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not
perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or
for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written
notification to the City and the City's prior written consent.
10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such
termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination.
Packet Pg. 255
7.10.b
11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document,
the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Fee Schedule attached hereto as
Exibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended
except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written
Agreement and any provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control.
12. Chimes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be
liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation
is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are
encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a
revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in
this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for
services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment
to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and
any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a
professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and
in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type
described in the Scope of Services.
14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
15. Non-assienahle. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that s/he has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that s/he has not paid or agreed to pay
any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty,
the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to
deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
17. Comrliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including
regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and
licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to
assure quality of services.
The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes
which may be due on account of this Agreement.
Packet Pg. 256
7.10.b
18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address:
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
Barker Landscape Architects, P.S.
3002 NW 68th Street
Seattle, WA 98117
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the
U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
DATED THIS DAY OF _ , 2017.
Cl Y FED S BARKER PE ARCHITECTS, P.S.
F
By By
David O. Earling, Mayor
ATTE UT ICATED:
Scott Passey, City Cl
APP VE AS TO FO
ice of the City Attorney
Packet Pg. 257
7.10.b
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF k ► nI )
rd
On this 3day of O G y 5 2017, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared Towi K Bc r r to me known to be the person who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free
and voluntary act and deed of said person, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,
and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
�1111LIIIjjj
t'%"" S Otv l V
j .'
RY PUBLIC
1AV036m.ExP3►� ;z= y commission ex es:
21.20 .: 22. Da
.� . ►�
�rr111' ollis FI tilwAO""",`
Packet Pg. 258
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
SCOPE OF WORK
2017 EDMONDS WATERFRONT RE -DEVELOPMENT
Landscape Architectural & Engineering Design Services
Design Services
The City of Edmonds (City) is proposing to redevelop their central waterfront adjacent to the Senior Center.
Planned improvements include removal of the parking structure on the beach, restoration and the construction
of a walkway, new plaza and parking lot at the Senior Center, and a new connecting walkway on the beach in
front of the Ebb Tide condominium building for public access to the promenade to the south.
Design for the Ebbtide and Waterfront Center began in September 2015 when Environmental Works
(architects for the Senior Center) engaged Barker Landscape Architects (Barker) to prepare earlier versions of
this scope of work and attached budget to assist the City with design and environmental permitting of the
project. Subsequently, in November 2016, Barker participated in a meeting with the project team, including
representatives from the City, the Senior Center, Herrera, and Environmental Works, to discuss project
elements and schedule.
The existing Edmonds Senior Center includes a building, parking lots, and sections of the Edmonds waterfront
walkway. A portion of the existing parking area and waterfront walkway are located on a fill area supported by
an older bulkhead. The City is planning to restore the shoreline in this area by removing the existing older
bulkhead and fill area. The waterfront walkway that is currently on the fill area would be relocated landward to
align approximately with the existing walkway located to the north and south of the fill area. The proposed
walkway would have a slight curve in towards the land and a new upper tidal pocket beach area will be
installed where the existing bulkhead and fill are located.
Current plans also include two beach access stairs, one located at each end of the new walkway section.
The plan also includes reorientation of the parking area with new drainage and rain garden systems. A pile -
supported bulkhead is planned on the waterward side of the new walkway. The design of the bulkhead is
anticipated to consist of buried steel I-beam piling supporting a concrete fascia.
Barker Landscape Architects has teamed with Reid Middleton Inc. (civil and waterfront engineers), Landau
Associates (geotechnical), SWCA (archaeological) and Bruce Myers artist. In coordination with Herrera
Environmental Consultants (who are under a separate contract with the City) we will be preparing surveys,
design plans, presentation graphics, permit applications and supporting documents for this design, which will
be used to assemble permit applications, for review and approval by the City, and to advertise for
construction of the project.
This scope of work includes the following:
Geotechnical and Cultural Resource Investigations.
Assistance with application for City land use permits (e.g. design
review,ADB,clearing and grading, right-of-way, stormwater)
City of Edmonds pre -application meeting and Land Use Application
Public and stakeholder meetings including public display Graphics
April 18, 2017 1 of 13 BarkerLandscape Architects
Packet Pg. 259
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Coordination with Architects for new Waterfront Center
Coordination with Environmental Consultants for Permits
Assistance with drawings for application for Federal and State land use
permits
r (e.g. USACE/Ecology/WDFW/JARPA) and associated activities based on pre -
application meetings and Land Use Application)
Full Civil and Landscape Architectural design and construction specification
writing
services (25%/50%/90%/Final Bid Docs)
Integrated public art elements to be compatible with existing Promenade
Cost estimates for Civil and Landscape Architectural elements
(25%/50%/90%/Final Bid Docs)
Full Bidding support
This scope of work does MLinclude the following:
Design of the Railroad Avenue streetscape or roadway improvements
r Building Utility design or coordination
Permitting assistance and preparation of studies related to hazardous
materials
Informal coordination with local tribes outside of the pre -application meeting
Permit Fees
Construction support services
Support during an appeal process for any project permits
The foliowino table outlines the work in this
Geotechnical
Investigation
Cultural Resources
Civil/Structural Design
Product
Borings
Recommendations for foundation
Compile known Cultural Resources
Foundation system design
Piling Plan
Piling Cap detail
walkway structural
railing structural
structural calculations
Purpose
• basis for design and cost estimate
• basis for SEPA
• basis for design and cost estimate
April 18, 2017 2 of 13 BarkerLandscape Architects
Packet Pg. 260
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Architectural, Walkway layout and grading basis for design, choices and cost estimates
Hardscape and Stair layout and grading
Landscape Design Ramp layout and grading
Public Art components Landscape plans for restoration, softening and screening
I Artistic elements integrated throughout
Based on the pre -application meeting with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that occurred on
September 11, 2015, the team meeting on November 2, 2016, and an evaluation of City of Edmonds
environmental permitting requirements, the following environmental permits and approvals are anticipated for
the project. Our team will support Herrera's permit applications (Herrera is not included in this contract) by
providing drawings, estimated materials quantities and schedules for these permit applications:
Regulatory Agency
Permit
Compliance Approvals
US Army Corps of
Clean Water Act Section 404 and Rivers and Harbors
• Endangered Species Act Compliance (may
Engineers (USACE)
Act Section 10 --Nationwide Permits
affect, not likely to adversely affect
I determination)
• Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act Compliance
I
• National Historic Preservation Act Section
106 Compliance
• Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency
Certification
Washington State
Section 401 Water Quality Certification
Department of Ecology
Construction Stormwater General Permit
(Ecology)
Washington Department
Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)
I
• State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
of Fish and Wildlife
Threshold Determination
City of Edmonds (City) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit • SEPA Threshold Determination
• Critical Areas Checklist and Review
These environmental permits are anticipated based on the following assumptions. If the project does not
continue to align with these assumptions, additional permits and approvals may be necessary, which are
not included in this scope:
r All project elements will be permitted together as one Federal project with two
separate phases for work that is vulnerable to appeal: Phase 1 includes
redevelopment of the Senior Center, the parking lot, and bulkhead
removal/beach restoration; Phase 2 includes the Ebb Tide Walkway.
r USACE will be the lead federal agency.
r Any intertidal eelgrass beds will not be impacted by project actions
r Proposed bulkhead/steps and stormwater outfall(s) will be located waterward
of the mean higher high water (MHHW) elevation of Puget Sound.
r No excavation of hazardous materials will occur waterward of MHHW
elevation.
r No excavation will occur in undisturbed native soil
April 18, 2017 3 of 13 BarkerLandscape Architects
Packet Pg. 261
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Project will comply with Washington Department of Natural Resources
guidelines for pile removal.
Excavation waterward of MHHW elevation will occur with equipment
positioned on uplands.
Construction staging will occur landward of MHHW elevation, with the
exception of the Ebb Tide Walkway, which may be constructed by barge.
Project will not result in a net increase of impervious surfaces.
Project will comply with current Washington State Department of
Ecology(Ecology) stormwater manual requirements.
Project will be constructed on property owned or on an easement held by the
City of Edmonds.
Ebb Tide Walkway will be constructed landward of the MHHW elevation.
Project will be permitted under a Section 404 Nationwide permit and will not
require an individual permit.
The project will not require an Individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification.
The beach restoration element of the project will be mitigation for
permanentimpacts associated with the Ebb Tide Walkway construction. No
off -site mitigation will be required.
Assistance with application for other City permits (e.g., clearing and grading,
right-of-way, stormwater, and building permits) and associated activities (e.g.,
City of Edmonds pre -application meeting and Land Use Application)
Permitting assistance or preparation of studies related to cultural resources or
hazardous materials
Project design services
Permit Roadmap
The new SMP is back with Ecology for comment and Kernen anticipates a decision around May 1, 2017
followed by the City adopting the ordinance and integrating it into code around June 1. Of course, all of this is
subject to change and would likely fall in the "later" rather than "sooner' timeframe.
The project will require a Land Use Application for a Conditional Use Permit (for the building — review under
the Architectural design board) and a Shoreline Permit (triggers the Critical Areas Report and SEPA
checklist). We cannot apply for these permits until the new SMP has been adopted and we have a decision
on the location of the walkway. Therefore, I'm aiming to have the SEPA Environmental Checklist, Critical
Areas Report, Biological Evaluation, and JARPA ready to go June 1, with City review of draft documents in
mid -May. City review of the permit applications would be 3-4 months, if all goes smoothly with public
comments.
The JARPA, Biological Evaluation, and Critical Areas Report should be submitted to the Corps around the
same June 1 timeframe. 50 percent design plans in Corps format will accompany the JARPA. Application
April 18, 2017 4 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 262
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
review and permit issuance could take 6-12 months. If the walkway remains on the beach, it should be
constructed on piers/piles to simplify CorpsMDFW permitting.
The HPA application requires a SEPA determination (part of the Land Use/Shoreline permit). HPAs are
typically issued in 45 days.
PROPOSED NEAR -TERM 2017-2018 SCHEDULE
Mid -May — Submit draft Critical Areas Report, SEPA Environmental Checklist, JARPA, and Biological
Evaluation for team/City review
Mid —May — Pre -application meeting with City, Corps, WDFW if walkway located on the beach
June 1 [adoration of SMP) — Submit Land Use Application, Critical Areas Report, Shoreline Permit Application,
SEPA Environmental Checklist to City; JARPA, Biological Evaluation, and Critical Areas Report to Corps
October — Shoreline Permit, Conditional Permit, SEPA determination issued from City; HPA application to
WDFW submitted
December — HPA issued
December (2017) to June (2018) — Corps permit issued
Overview of Project Tasks:
Barker's scope of work includes a discussion of the activities, assumptions, and deliverables associated with
the following tasks that Barker will perform on the project:
Task A: Scoping, Baseline Investigations & 25% Preliminary Design
Task B: 50% Design Development and Permit Submittal
Task C: 90% Construction Documents
Task D: Final Bid Documents
Task A — Scoping, Baseline Investigations and 25% Preliminary Design
Barker and the Team will develop a permitting plan in the form of a matrix that will serve as a permitting "road
map" for the project. The matrix will identify applicable required federal, state, and City permits/approvals
required for the project. For each permit/approval identified, the plan will identify the regulatory agency and
contact information; jurisdiction/trigger; submittal information and required supporting materials; permit
review timelines; fees; and comments specific to project elements. In addition, this task will entail assessing
applicability of streamlined permitting mechanisms, potential mitigation requirements, and related support for
navigating the permitting process. Under a separate contract, Herrera will coordinate with USACE, WDFW,
the Tulalip Tribe, and the City's Development Services Department as necessary to develop the permitting
plan.
Barker and Team will prepare for and participate in meetings with the project team to discuss project plans,
design development, schedule, necessary permits, and permit submittal requirements. Herrera will prepare
for and participate in a pre -application meeting with representatives from USACE, WDFW, the Tulalip Tribe,
and the project team to discuss the permitting plan, permit submittal requirements and schedule, and
proposed mitigation strategy. Herrera will coordinate with the project team to prepare coordination/support
materials for the pre -application meeting, including drawings, evaluation documents, calculations, or other
materials, as requested by the City project manager. Meeting notes will be prepared by the Team following
April 18, 2017 5 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 263
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
all meetings. This scope does not include frontage or building utility design work.
Reid Middleton will finalize the Coastal Engineering Report to address wave and tidal forces, Landau will
compile geotechnical boring and subsurface conditions reports from existing and new data, SWCA will do
baseline Cultural/archaeological research, and work with the team and Herrera to contribute to the SEPA
Environmental Checklist. This baseline information will contribute to appropriate design plans and permit
applications.
Landau Associates (LAI) will review previously collected geotechnical data in the vicinity of the proposed
project and complete two borings at the site in order to characterize the soil and groundwater conditions. One
boring will be located within the portion of the existing parking area and waterfront walkway that is located
within the fill area supported by the older bulkhead. The second boring will be located to the east of the first
boring along the approximate alignment of the new bulkhead. The proposed borings will each be advanced to
a depth of about 35 ft below existing site grades, or until practical refusal. Access to the site is somewhat
limited due to parking use. We therefore propose that Barker Landscape Architects or the City temporarily
restrict parking access in the boring areas when we plan to drill. Care will be exercised to limit surface
disturbance during drilling and backfilling of the exploratory borings; however, some disturbance to the existing
pavement is inevitable and our services do not include landscaping or extensive pavement restoration other
than patching the boreholes with lean mix concrete.
The explorations will be coordinated and monitored by a LAI representative. The explorations will be located in
the field by reference to available site features. To avoid buried utilities, we will coordinate with the City for any
know information about existing site utilities, contact the one -call utility locating service, and hire a private utility
locating service to check for potential conflicts with underground utilities prior to performing field activities.
Representative soil samples will be obtained from the explorations at selected intervals and transported to our
geotechnical testing laboratory for further examination and testing. Soil samples obtained from the explorations
will be held in our laboratory for 30 days after submittal of the final report. After that date, the soil samples will
be disposed of unless arrangements are made to retain them. Geotechnical laboratory testing will be
completed on representative soil samples obtained from the explorations, and is planned to consist of visual
classifications, natural moisture content determinations, and grain size classifications and hydrometer
analyses on up to 2 samples.
Engineering analyses and reporting by Landau Associates will include review of the information collected
during their subsurface explorations and site reconnaissance and conduct geotechnical engineering analyses
in order to develop geotechnical conclusions and recommendations to support the design of certain proposed
project features. The results of the field explorations, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and
geotechnical engineering conclusions and recommendations will be summarized in a draft written report. Upon
receipt of review comments from Barker Landscape Architects and the City, Landau Associates will address
the comments and submit a signed and sealed geotechnical report. The geotechnical report will include:
A site plan showing pertinent existing site features and the approximate
location of the borings completed for this project, as well as readily available
previous explorations in the vicinity of the project by LAI and others.
Descriptive logs of the subsurface explorations and the results of the
geotechnical laboratory testing program.
A summary of surface and subsurface soil and groundwater conditions
observed during our field exploration program. Estimate groundwater flow
April 18, 2017 6 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 264
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
rate, in the event that dewatering is required during construction. This
information will need to be part of the bid package, so Contractors can
estimate the type and cost of an adequate dewatering system.
A summary of what possible contamination might be expected, or possible
buried objects like logs or debris from waterfront uses prior to the senior
center.
A phase one environmental assessment will be done as part of this scope.
Additional borings shall be done to reduce unwanted surprises during
construction. The testing shall include shallower, and more test pits that was
originally proposed. Included is the lab/testing work involved in determining if
there is soil contamination. Also it will include a test pit, or drilling, near
where the bioswale is shown on the plans.
An evaluation of the feasibility of the proposed project with respect to
geotechnical considerations.
Recommendations for site preparation and earthwork, including reuse of site
soil, and criteria for selection, placement, and compaction of structural fill.
Recommended temporary and permanent excavation slopes.
An estimation, based on our proposed borings, of the thickness of fill to be
encountered in the area of the existing older bulkhead to be removed.
Seismic design criteria.
Recommendations for lateral earth pressures (presented in terms of
equivalent fluid pressures) for the pile supported bulkhead under static and
dynamic loading conditions for use in design of the bulkhead.
Recommendations for shallow foundation support of the smaller project
features such as stair structures and seat wall, including subgrade
preparation, allowable soil bearing pressure, estimates of settlement, and soil
parameters for lateral load resistance.
An assessment of the feasibility of infiltrating stormwater in the raingarden
areas. Estimates of infiltration rates will be based on grain size analyses.
Recommendations for geotechnical monitoring and consultation during
construction.
Preliminary Architectural and Engineering design is the focus of this Task, and the team will develop concepts
to present to the City and Stakeholders to get input and make revisions as needed. This will include plans, 3D
computer models, sections, details, and illustrations to convey the character and form, elevation and size of
the components making up the walkway. Transitions to the existing promenades and seawalls, the new
Waterfront Center, parking plaza and restoration areas, and in all compass directions will be developed.
Assumptions
Barker will review a draft permit matrix and roadmap prepared by Herrera and
comment by the project team and Herrera will respond to one consolidated set
of comments and finalize the permit matrix.
April 18, 2017 7 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 265
7.10.b
Exhibit A
Deliverables
April 18, 2017
SCOPE OF WORK
Evaluation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) will not be
triggered.
The project will be evaluated under the City's proposed Shoreline Master Plan
update and Critical Areas Ordinance update.
The project will be evaluated using the proposed updates to the USACE Seattle
District's 2017 Nationwide permits (Special Public Notice dated June 20, 2016,
as revised).
Barker and Team will prepare for and participate in up to five (5) one -hour
conference calls with the project team and provide meeting notes after each
meeting.
Herrera under a separate contract will make all necessary arrangements for the
on -site pre -application meeting with USACE, WDFW, Tulalip Tribes, and project
team members. Herrera will prepare a meeting agenda. Barker team members
of will provide design drawings and calculations, and review as relevant to
support the discussion in this meeting.
The pre -application meeting is assumed to be up to 2 hours in length and will be
held at the project site; travel time to the meeting is assumed to be 30 minutes
each way from Barker's offices. Reimbursable rate is $.05351mile, per US
General Services Administration.
The pre -application meeting will be attended by Barker and Reid Middleton
Barker and Team will submit monthly invoices in a format approved by City.
Preliminary Waterfront Center Site Plan
Preliminary DemolitionlTESC Plan
Preliminary Promenade Walkway Layout Plan
Preliminary Waterfront Center Restoration Plan
3D computer model simulating preferred layout plan
Final Coastal Engineering Report
Geotechnical Report
Archaeological Research Report
Preliminary Promenade Architectural and Landscape Design
Preliminary Bulkhead Engineering Plan
Preliminary Stair Engineering Plan
Preliminary Beach Material Engineering Plan
Preliminary Grading and Paving Plan
Preliminary Stormwater Plan
8 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 266
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Preliminary Water and Sewer Plan, not included
Permit Plan coordinated with Herrera
Pre -Application Meeting agenda and notes
Preliminary Probable Cost of Construction Estimate in accordance with the
City's estimating policy.
Project Schedule
Task B — 50% Design Development
Barker and Team will develop schematic plans that are based on city and stakeholder input from task A
review. The Team will prepare for and participate in meetings with the City and Stakeholders to discuss
project plans, which will include 50% level Cover, TESC plans, grading and drainage at the transitions north
and south of the EbbTide, Pile and Superstructure Plans and Details, Layout plans, Site Sections, Walkway
and Stair design details. The team will also produce 50% level Edmonds/CSI format specifications, and Cost
Estimates. The 50% design models, plans, details, projected costs and project schedule will be presented to
the City Team and Architectural Design Board.
Assumptions
Barker Landscape Architects and Team will use input from Task A to finalize the
preferred alternative layout to develop full package of 50% complete drawings
and specifications.
The drawing submittal will be prepared using ACAD 2014 and will include a
cover sheet,
TESC/demolition/grading/drainage/layoutllandscape, civil and structural plans
The team meetings are assumed to be up to 2 hours in length and will be held at
the project site or nearby; travel time to the meeting is assumed to be 30
minutes each way from Barker and Team member offices. Reimbursable rate is
$.0535/mile, per US General Services Administration.
These drawings will be formatted for permit applications, and submitted to the
agencies once they have been approved by the Client.
The team meetings will be attended by two Barker and two Reid Middleton staff.
Barker and Team will submit monthly invoices in a format approved by City.
Review of HPA Permit, Ecology Permit, and Critical Areas Report
Deliverables
50% Waterfront Center Site Plan
50% Demolition/TESC Plan
50% Waterfront Center Restoration Plan
50% Promenade Walkway Layout Plan
April 18, 2017 9 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 267
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
' 3D computer model simulating preferred layout plan
' 50% Bulkhead Engineering Plan
' 50% Stair Engineering Plan
' 50% Beach Material Plan
' 50% Grading and Paving Plan
' 50% Stormwater Plan & Report
' 50% Landscape Plan
' 50% Water and Sewer Plan, not included
' Waterfront Center Utilities and Road Frontage Plan not included
' Permit Application supporting plans and material quantities
' Project Schedule
' 50% Plans, Sections and Materials List
' 50% Outline Specifications in Edmonds/CSI format
' 50% Probable Cost of Construction Estimates
' 50% Architectural Design Board Presentation materials
' Permit Applications, JARPA/Shoreline, USACE/Ecology/City drawing formats
Task C — 90% Construction & Bid Documents
Barker and Team will develop 90% construction plans that are based on city and stakeholder input from task
C review. The Team will prepare for and participate in meetings with the City and Stakeholders to discuss
project plans, which will include any revisions from City and Agency review, including 90% level Cover sheet,
TESC/demolition plans, grading and drainage the restored beach, parking lot and plaza at the Waterfront
Center, at the transitions north and south of the EbbTide, Pile and Superstructure Plans and Details for the
walkway, Layout plans, Materials plans, Site Sections, Walkway and Stair design details.
The team will also produce 90% level Project Bid Manual, CSI format specifications, and Probable
Construction Cost Estimates, The 90% design models, plans, details, projected costs and project schedule
will be available to be presented to the City Team and Architectural Design Board if necessary.
This iteration of the drawings and details will be ready for submittal to the City for Clearing/Grading and
Building Permits. At this point structural calculations and other permit submittal requirements will be
prepared along with permit applications. The Team will prepare the documents for client approval, and
submit the permits once approved. The City will pay any and all permit application and review fees.
Assumptions
' Barker Landscape Architects and Team will use input from Task C to develop
full package of 90% complete construction drawings and specifications.
' The drawing submittal will be prepared using ACAD 2014 and will include a
cover sheet, TESC/demolition/gradingldrainagellayout/landscape, civil and
April 18, 2017 10 of 13 BarkerLandscape Architects
Packet Pg. 268
7.10.b
Exhibit A
Deliverables
SCOPE OF WORK
structural plans
Coordination with all permit agencies will be done during this phase as
necessary to keep the permit process moving as smoothly as possible. Design
clarifications and/or modifications may be requested by these agencies, and
these will be discussed with the City to determine any necessary actions.
The team meetings are assumed to be up to 2 hours in length and will be held at
the project site or nearby; travel time to the meeting is assumed to be 30
minutes each way from Barker and Team member offices. Reimbursable rate is
$.0535/mile, per US General Services Administration.
The team meetings will be attended by two Barker, and one Reid Middleton staff
members.
Coordination with utility companies to ensure all utilities within the project limits
have been identified and are shown on the plans, not included.
City standard details will be incorporated into the plan set.
Multiple bid schedules may be required to accommodate available funding
sources.
All bid schedules will include enough bid items to breakdown the construction
work to be performed by the contractor. The City will have the final approval on
the type and quantity of bid items to be used in the contract.
Quantity tabulations shall be prepared for each bid item and submitted to City for
review.
The drainage design will comply with the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.30 and the stormwater addendum.
Maximum Extent Feasible documents for sidewalk designs that can't meet ADA
requirements, not included
Barker and Team will submit monthly invoices in a format approved by City.
Revised drawings based on City, Stakeholder, Agency Input as necessary
90% Plans, Sections and Details (see detailed list, subject to change)
90% Draft Project Bid Manual in Edmonds format with WSDOT/APWA Division
1 General Requirements and special provisions
90% Project Construction Specifications in Edmonds/CSI format
90% Probable Cost of Construction Estimates in accordance with the City's
estimating policy
90% Architectural Design Board Presentation materials
Clearing/Grading/Building/Stormwater Permit Submittal
Revised Permit Ap lications, JARPA/Shoreline, USACE/Ecology, City formats
April 18, 2017 11 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 269
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Final Stormwater Report
Project Schedule (updated monthly)
Task D — Final Bid Documents
Barker and Team will develop Final Project Bid Manual and Construction plans that are based on city and
stakeholder input from task D review. The Team will prepare for and participate in meetings with the City
and Stakeholders to discuss project plans, which will include any revisions from City and Agency review,
including the Final Cover sheet, TESC/demolition plans, grading and drainage at the transitions north and
south of the EbbTide, Pile and Superstructure Plans and Details for the walkway, Layout plans, Materials
plans, Site Sections, Walkway and Stair design details. The team will also produce the Final Project Bid
Manual, CSI format specifications, and Probable Construction Cost Estimates. The Final design models,
plans, details, projected costs and project schedule will be available to be presented to the City Team and
Architectural Design Board if necessary.
The Team will also follow up with all permit agencies to ensure that permits are issued, and any changes
required by the permits are incorporated into the bid documents. Any final fees required to issue permits
will be paid by the City.
Assumptions
Barker Landscape Architects and Team will use input from Task D to develop
full package of final complete construction drawings and specifications.
The drawing submittal will be prepared using ACAD 2014 and will include a
cover sheet, TESC/demolition/grading/drainage/layout/landscape, civil and
structural plans, and all necessary details and permit requirements.
Coordination with all permit agencies will be done during this phase as
necessary to get the permits issued for construction.
The team meetings are assumed to be up to 2 hours in length and will be held at
the project site or nearby; travel time to the meeting is assumed to be 30
minutes each way from Barker and Team member offices. Reimbursable rate is
$.0535/mile, per US General Services Administration.
The team meetings will be attended by one Barker, and one Reid Middleton staff
members.
Maximum Extent Feasible documents for sidewalk designs that cannot meet
ADA requirements, not included.
Barker and Team will submit monthly invoices in a format approved by City.
Deliverables
Final drawings based on City, Stakeholder, Agency Input as necessary
Final Plans, Sections and Details including all permit revisions issued for
construction.
April 18, 2017 12 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 270
7.10.b
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
Final Maximum Extent Feasible (MEF) documentation
Final Project Bid Manual in Edmonds/CSI format
Final Project Construction Specifications in Edmonds/CSI format
Updated Probable Cost of Construction Estimates
Final Architectural Design Board Presentation materials
Permits issued for construction: JARPA/Shoreline, USACE/Ecology, City
grading and building permits.
ASSISTANCE DURING BIDDING:
Prepare addenda and respond to bidders questions relayed through the City. It is assumed that Barker will
prepare three (3) addenda, unless additional addenda are necessary to correct errors or omissions by Barker
and/or Team in the design plans or specifications.
April 18, 2017 13 of 13 Barker Landscape Architects
Packet Pg. 271
7.10.b
Exhibit B 1
City of Edmonds
aNlo
Design Services for Edmonds Waterfront�t,rra.,n
Overwater Walkway @ Ebb Tide `'�e *� pill + r
Redevelopment �`W: 11
201FSSgePofW» IkFaLarlmkblo. Pansy r ,.�.+k 1vq•+.,,:
jj�flFalgn a C[yhtlaV Sarvpbs oracles A'rts3
Scope of work and Fee Proposal 4)
prepamd by Bela Lendsrepe A mhdecls
3002NW681h Street Seayk.We#mxon99117 (206J7832870 U'(206)783J212 gd.@15sakedacam Iris
E
Assumptions.
Larxbospe A Mdural, Begi ng servees mrfua design, Pandang Marioes for he Ebb Tide and
new Warerlrent
Center Moreline pmensoade devebpleml ant reabrelion Al m h %bmilal, Oil will heve 3 weeks b review and
mapoM Cily is responslde far easements, any legal toes, dMkatbn kgoi documents and legal upped
Not Worried.Permit subal" lees. ConsWcbwl edminbtrafion
T fine Marsh 2017Jan-y 2018(mayeAaM IsM.,loupe 2010 dapeMirg on parrot protest)
Los[ upda col 4 2017
wa au.aa...iagrn awes 29%
Bedta Landscape Archnecis
NWA&*k".
Lam, SWCA My".
.wMv.�'.r�m�+ IaRel dates
,
sera
st,+.. cv
aee.a s.ti-,• u
5 tA, Bagl lino h1 D Ti Prifilirflinmy Ogsigin
tax
y po
IN
IBMraN
Penny Real plan aM coordination w/Teare during 25%Deslgn Spdng 2"'
8
6
6
SM1R
(1) Kickoff and (4) Team Site Visit Spdng 2017
4
4
$787
$1,1171
(1) Internal Team Coordination Meetings Spring 2017
$
3
9'
$248.0
(1) EWC Team CoaNlnslhn Meetings Sprig 2017
3
$
2
$2480
Background Review Spring 2017
$
4
4
$1,309
$1,5787
(3) CrySpring 2117
61
6
$903
$1,2989
(2)Srakeholdermea11 Spri112117
4
6
a
$528
$9630
Deolechnlcal lnvesdg*M Spring 2017
1
1
1
66.078 $1,501
$7,8640
Biological Evaluation review Spring 2017
;
2
2
$2175
SEPA Environmental Che&M review Spring 2017
7
2
k.
$1653
P.11. Ovetwel.r Walkway Engineering Spring 2017
$7.212
$712118
Overwlter Walkway ArchNwiural and Landscaper Design Spring 2017
6
20
20
$2.000
SBA4&0
25%Coal Ell Spring 2017
4
4
6
$3770
Pro)ed Management McMrng roles, QNQCgcmuntirg and Office Support Spring 2017
12
10
8
$1,353
$2,1940
Update proy:ct ldhadule Seri 2017
1
3
1
$1407
Udall
90
97
75
..bud
MAN
SUM
%M i1A61 $Imp
932r218
nt
L3w.L.M.eersrAU
_m Ira.
1yp)dsrpa.n. acile es FMIdal ra tM during sukr4r 2D17
3
e
6
1:.:5E
Pas zpvlw meawgs, Oannivica Napeclasn p+orP.�Orn for Fed Stale, and City pelf Summer2017
1
4
$275
$512e
(2)T-9te Vista Summer 2017
0
0
6
$495.9
(2) Informal Team Coordination Meednge Susie 7
4
9
a
$4350
(2) EWC Team Coordination Moorings Sum-2017
4
4
4
$330.6
Coordination mee0ngs with Permuting Agendas Somara 017
6
14
a
$6932
Technical Description pormho and roponeeo to tech. question Summar2017
2
e
$B14
$1,424.0
Update task 0slto respond to project permg requhemenb gathered during 25%design Summa2017
0
$2320
Design Revlslons Summel
a
12
4
$6044
Updabld 3D model and Sknul.does Sunn-2017
1
10
16
$7381
SbrkehddereagagemeM Summer 2017
a
A
12
$5162
50% Engheerlrg Drawings Summer 2017
$10,160
$10.1600
Site Plan Engineering Summer 2017
$1,540
$500
62,0400
Coal Engineering Summer 2017
$589
$Us5
Overweter Walkway Engineering Pile Plan Summer2017
$6,391
$0,391.0
Overwater Sup.r.[mctur6 Engineering Plan and Delelh Summer2017
$7,109
$7,799.D
Fn9ln"'ng for RNlings Surnind 17
$1,474
$1,474.0
Engineering for Decking and Flnlehes Summer 2017
$1,736
$11738.0
Enp'cwel9y for T-aadalmmoNr4adm4 Summer 201f
$5,742
$500
$8,2420
50% Cover Sheel(l shear) Summer 2017
1
2
6
$2277
50% TEED I Demo Plan (2 sheets) Summer 2017
1
2
4
$1813
50%Dealing & Drainage Plan, (I shell) Summe2011
1
2
12
$3973
50% My Plan, (I ahea) Sone-2017
4
2
12
$3973
50% Layout plans (1 shce0 Summer 2017
4
10
12
$6902
50% Ebb Tide walkway,railing, Wlledc and stair design dotalle(I shoot) Summer2017
4
4
18
i3B0
$3,1600
50% TreneNon Plana. Beach. Bouldere, Material, Bails and Lendoupe plan(I shnq Summer 2017
a
19
24
$4,360.0
""G¢dm' g cry FemaMa 1s hit wasawr¢Btt
4
4
10
$1,620.0
50%Land.upe0nlgallon plan and details if of Summer 2017
1
2
8
$2741
Review, of M Set Summer2017
a
12
$4690
50%Modified CSl formal ou[lin spectrabone Summer 2017
20
$
16
$3,454
$4,6792
50%Cost Estimate Summer2017
12
0
11
$902
$1,6966
JARPA/Shoraflne PermhsubmlSel drawings (Boll RM CAD work only- not included In Norma scope) Bummer 2017
1s
14
70
1810500
50% Architectural Design Review Document &Presenflon Surn-2017
A
10
20
$9976
QAIOC Review of 60% Bel Summer2017
12
23
6
$1,337
$2,5081
Submit PermitApplicallme Sumase,2017
12
2
10
$1946
sublolM
149
192
y29
ka"
$29,731
W]l4
$a W 5120
s73 40
Arc1.NA
4Bee MlM
e axe, .� during TOW D-L;V FII
Team Sae Mlb Fall 2017
6
B
6
4*
$4959
Team CooNkletlon Meetings Fall 2017
6
6
$4959
Coordination mal with Parenting Agendas FaI1201;
2
6
52349
Revised ask list to respond to pmjKi Permit requirements gathered during Ely%design Fa 20
2
a
$2929
Design Ill Fall 2017
6
6
18
$785A
Site Plan Engineering Fell 2017
2
2
10
$275
$1,485
Demolition Engineering Fall 2017
$275
$275
Ovenvaler Walkway Engineering Pile Plan Fall MIT
$1,848
51184a
Ovenaler SupmamlcWre Pan 60.1.11a Fall 2017
$5,973
K973
Engineering tar Ralling Fall 2017
$1,177
$1,177
Engineering far Decking and Fl,khes Fall 2017
$1,386
$1,380
Engineering far Trensltlon Modlncationa Fall 2017
$3,476
$3,470
90%Engyreadng Dall FeI12017
.$
4
2
$8,393
$8,585.9
90%Design Fe112017
1
4
2
$1929
90%Cover.k-vslta Plan (2 sheets) Fall 2017
1
1
2
$365
90%TESC/ Dome Ms. (2 sheets) Fall 2017
4
1
11
$4307
90% Pde Plan (1 IN"' FeI1201;
1
1
$
Soups
BO%SupereWdure PtanaMDeblle (2.hets
e) Fa112017
2
4
6
$1,250
90%Raghlg, Including aided, and a lruchmel.iemem.(I shear) Fall 2017
8
8
1$
$1,0W
53,710
WA backing end Fleshes (1 shesl) Fall 2017
4
4
11
$500
$2,500
90%CIW A Structural plans and detais(2 sheets) Fall 2017
2
4
0
$M661
90%Landecapallo llon plans and del us shoal) Fall 2017
3
12'
22
$1,1111.11
90%test mul le Fell 2017
4
4
4
$902
$1,279.0
ONOC Review of 90%Sal Fa II 2017
S
23
6
$1.221
$2,2708
Front End Spedfoallms Fe112017
20
16
0
$1,1832
Develop specifications and bra manual -90% Modified C5l Specked- Fall 2017
32
3
1$
$3,245
$4,2339
Packet Pg. 272
7.10.b
Exhmtl 13.1
BuWep Pem4 wbmW Fe12017 a 25 $3,113
Clew and Grade Paradt submSW Fah 2017 ] e 25 WA
UtlhyI SWmbr PermM stibff el Fa320>1 2 a 95 $872.9
. tom 113 166 252
1 ear 32k.414 Ims II 1e $p sl wl $51.147
e,aw
Teem Comd11e6m51eeMipe
WMer2017
4
4
a
S330A
See Pen EnWM*V
Whller 2017
$275
$275.0
Deradkhn Erlgkm q
WW2011
$276
$2760
Ow*IW Welkny Engbaerrtp Plle Pen
Whtter2017
Ilm
$352A
Omwdu Supereauoera Plan 6 Debris
WhAwMi7
H,17i
$11177A
Rdk,g
www201T
$352
$362.0
Deddng and FSdaltee
WWK2017
$626
$826,0
Tw&"Modta"
Weet2017
$1,139
$1,738.0
FrWD,&w o
1Wkm. y
17
1e
24 $8,916
$7,300,0
Fmrd End Sp ollmU m
We6r 2017
IA
4
8
8849.7
Tom,"S wwftwm
Wirier 2017
15
4
4 VA30
$2,28.9
100%Cod E4Ynee
Weer2017
+7
2
12 $726
$1A27.8
Croee.Aloe hid Kt"102 a WCOngrodee MMYg e0=01
SpMp 2018
6
12
12
$pp9.1
Pmbld oeneroms, dwft om
Sprhg 2016
a
8 8184
$60TA
Oute bki, 8tl SWW, Anwar Mike quesdom
Sp6ng 2016
5
12
14 $01
$1,387A
AddaMa(euune 3 mW ow btl dda requhe mom)
Bp6tp 2016
d.
r2
S $866
$1,682.0
OAIOC
415
8
IB
4 $1ARS
$2,111A
--o Iddx nwu,e:m al ,4 eg
3DB
142
96
Funu.
43M
Slate: 51 A 1r.
$24 572
Barwl�a>tp4'eAtvMta
t►aaw axu
7ewn11M31[ae3uarpeAnHarrLr
$hareem EM, Gededl Azfrsau W A6
TOTAL• ALL DESIGN WORK
3runs
$94428 $8,078 $t,601 $60e
$181,382
2%(halhi w*0 ki end eeyonue iw pm -p, meaape, pm%w. am.
53Gp8
PROPOSED 0ESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT
$105 009
10%M4n"ww Remrro (pa unfP1e69gn'%wk
Sm.501
TOTAL PROPOSED DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT
$203,510
Packet Pg. 273
Exhibit 9.2
7.10.b
City of Edmonds
Design Services for Edmonds Waterfront
Parking
Redevelopment
Lot
.1 1 + ,,
�•
;;,:,"•.,,,
y n
2w11_SOM MwOrk fQ&VI50 F$td. Aafu32xrmga+aSGulurV Semcea Dirmlrr
Scope of work and Fee Proposal
on"'by Badua Landscape An3itlada
3002 NW 6Bfh Sheol, seams, Washlrgdn 98f 17
(206)783.2870 fsx(2os)7B&92f2 pbnl§dakedemn
Aaeumptlma.
leiMsra s, ArcNleduml, Engineering aervkes for fun dealgn, penrieng se aces ha he Ebb Tide aid new W,I rhaM
teal updated 4 2017
Carter shoreline pmmenade develot an pmend malvetion At eadi submillal, CilyM have 3 Necks to review and
mr9od City is maporulbW for easements, any legal tree, dedication legal doroments, and legal support
E
a
Net dchmi d-
U
Pend wintral fees, Coneewdion admidee bon
(�
Tmelme March 2017Jenuary 2018 (msy emend Ann. inlo 2078 deparder, on perm4proressJ
L
r
e.mba dowmi qq.a e.ar c 29%
Berk.L rxscaye A1d*..
=11ftIl
lead. SNCA
Ily-
0
U
a+.w.a dawarw�+W ear.. dgrl dales
la�,a.sm
w o..y,.r
smron nq
udu, pdudw,
..
A. 3co In 8as lino ngoalf ollo and 25% LWIrnindary 1holgri
slag
SIM
N
Do
Q
Penh Rcadmep plan and coordination wf7sam during 25%Design Sprig 2017
6
4
4
$6612
(1] h1,101 anal (4 ham Sl,a Vlfa Spring 2017
a
4
A
$649
$9790
N
(1) Intamd Team Coordination Meetings Spring 2017
3
$
]
S2489
(1) EWC Team CoordeleOon Heeling. Spring 2017
2
1
$2480
Background Review Spring 2017
$.
t
A
$347
$6162
$C
(3)CBy Meelhg. Spring 2017
a
/
4
SW
$9359
J
(2) Stakeholder maeligs Spring 2017
4
/
/
$4350
to
Bbbglwl Evaluation mNew Spmg 2017
2
3
$2175
L
SEPA Envlmnmenlel Cla lst land. Spring 2017
2
2
2
$1653
0
Pnikg eta Plat Eegplr Ylnn f8LAWA Spfnff
t
a
/
$1,023
$2,413.0
Prallmf.+abiaad alNfdaleaq Spring 2017
1
3
5
$550
$1,35&0
W
Preliminary Grading and Paving Elglneedn9 Spring 2017
$2,240
$2.239.6
Preliminary Blornwahr Entimeedng wl Seker Spring 2017
1
3
6
ry,965
$2,160.6
a
25%Coal Estimate Spring 2017
4
4
a
S825
$1,202.0
�..a
Preied Management, Meeting rotes, OAIGCAscounhag and Office Support Spring 2017
12
10
a
$759
51,0.0
V
Update purled &clwdSule rim 2017
1
3
f
$14140,7
.0
subtotal
85
8B
72
anwal
sB,9B3
142
34 Te
1rl V7 780
a
r
e
awrlaxcn...cr-xn
lw.sr sAT.v.
P Ld
�
d
Pm)ecl plane conkmnces/mxfnaxalw7 Tara 0.,•kq
3
+
a
S346B
P-01hatlon meetings, cuerdlnagon w) agencies In pmpashlon for Fed State, and Clty pBmdtihlg Summer 2017
4
+
52316
(2) Team Site Vishe Summe12011
0
0
0
§4g5g
Q
(2) Intemal Teem Coordination MWIngs Sumner2011
4
P.
n
$4350
O
(2) EWC Team Coordination Meetings Summer 2017
A
1
$3306
42
Coordination nceetlngs with PurmlWng Agendas Summer 2017
/:
19
a
68932
d
Technical Description permits and responses to tech questions Summer2011
2'
$402
$576.4
Update task halbrespond to pro)ed permit requirements gathered during 25%design Summer 2017
A
5232.0
Design Revisions Summer 2017
6
12
4
$WA
Updated 3D model and Simulations Summer2011
1
10
18
$7381
Stekeholdereagagament Summer2017
a
4
12
55102
++
50% Engineering Muffin Summer 2017
1
1
4
7337
$7,4893
0
Site Plan Englrreerhg Summer2017
2
2
10
539
$8699
LL
Carol Engineering Summrr2017
275
$2750
L
Engineering for Paing, sMphg Summer20I7
1584
$1.514.0
r
Grading 6 S1omeweter Engllwering lac -Report Summer2017
591E
55,9180
(�
Englneering for Curbing and Sklewslk Summer 2017
1034
$1,034.0
50% Cover Shot (1 sheet) Summer 2017
t
2
6
5221,7
50% TESC I Demo Plan 12 sheets) Summer 2017
t
2
A
5181.3
SD% Grading 6 Drainage Plane (I sheet) Summer 2017
2
2
12
$3973
60% Utllty Plam(I sheet) Summer 2017
2
2
12
$397.3
0
�+
50% Layout plans (I &has[) Summer 2017
a
10
12
$6902
0
50% She Sedbns(l steel) Summer 2017
4
b
0
$6322
(�
50%Pevhg and Still Plen(I sheet) Summer 2017
.
1
$2
$6322
Qi
50% Pawing and S7dpleg plan (I sheet) Summer 2017
2
6
i
$1,00.0
K
30% Landecapehmtgatlon plan and dehlle(l ghat) Summer 2017
1
2
1
$245.0
QS
Review of 50% Set Summer 2017
4
12
$090
50% Mouthed CSl lineal outline specifications Summer 20W
20
a
16
1837
$2,9622
50% Cost Estimate Summer 2017
12
6
11
625
$1,619.0
0
JARPA I Shomllne Permit submldal drawings (Barker RM CAD work only- not Included In Harrem scope) Summer 2017
10
4
70
$2,3345
50% Amlillectuml Design Review Document a Preanllon Summer 2017
a
9y
20
$9976
Q
GA/GC Review of 50% Set Sumadva 7
12
23
6
1177
$2,3486
N
Submit PemlhApp'kallons Summer 2017
12
2
16
$794•8
d
&du2e4
146
197
subtofel
$IA10
f3011,11
$o U
is $39.960
0
0
L
^."-. r4rUl AAYkiacn
SNCA
M
Fee Ew
Team Site Vials Felt 2017
a
6
6
$4959
1
Teem Coordination Meelhgs Fall 2017
a
a
6
$495 9
Coordination meetings vnm Permuting Agencies Fail 2017
$
a
$234.9
5
Revised task llsl to respond is petard pent requirements, gathered during 60%design Fall 2017
2
a
$2929
d
Design Whims Fall 2017
a
1
16
$7859
0_
90% Engineering Design Fall 2017
1
4
2
I6,B53
$7,045.9
She Plan Engineering Fall 2017
$622
$6215
(�
DemolPoon Englneer'vlg Fell 2017
$275
$2750
(n
Engbeedng for Pevkg. striping Frill 2017
$1,009
$11089.0
'a
Grading S Sfomnroter Engneering Fel2017
$1,ua
$1,846.0
!_
Engmeadrg for Curbing and Sidewalk Fall 2017
$1,309
$1,309.0
$�
90% Cover sheeOShe Plan (2 sheets) Fall 2017
1
S
2
$105•9
J
90%TESC/ Dam. Pins (2 'beat.) Fall 2017
1
1
16
$430.7
L
90% Civil and Structural plans end details (2 sheets) Fell 2017
2
4
B
$316.1
0
90% Lendecepellmgallon plans and data]. (4 iduel) Fall 2017
a
52
32
S1,0
atlmate Fall 2017
{
a
fi
5550
§9270270
16.90%uc.l
Review of 90% Set Fail 2017
1
46
$913
$1,9620
ccGA/GC
Front End Specihcatloas Fall 2017
26
I6
6
$1,1832
in
Develop specifications and bid manual-90% Modned CSl Specifiralhns Far 2017
22
2
10
$1,353
$2,341-9
r
Buldhg Permit submhlel Fee 2017
2
i
25
1103A
0
Clear and Grade Ierm submkbrl Fall 2017
3
a
25
S903A
d
Uhhhy I Sherearlur Pa." submidal Fell 2017
1
a
25
$012.9
subtulal
97
137
197
sublole7
$11,497
$"1
a
Packet Pg. 274
7.10.b
ExWba B.2
FhW
n.1a
r
Nrr..a
Tern CWdkm0MMeedrpe
Wbbr2017
4
4
4
06
Me Plan EnowrIng
Mnl"2017
$136
$1376
Dendkbn Enneakp
Wkder 2017
$13B
$137,6
++
ErpkmwN W PevW, eklpkp
WM W 2017
$1.023
$1,023.0
RmOVASlon-elerEnpfineft
Wbbr2017
$1 N
$1.298.0
En*e8dVfxCuMrp66dffiWk
WbbrN17
$275
$V5.0
E
plod D.*kpe
Mbr2011
1!
18
N
$4,167
$5,6116
Front End SpedBwOorm
WIMer2017
15
4
B
$040.7
TWA* 6peditt1 a
N4nbr2017
1$
4
1
$0
$uma
100%Co6tEdbmb
ftler2017
12
2
12
Illm
$1,2516
Creeb Mltlpe Md edmduM b exaemodeb Wep=me
eprkp201B
6
12
12
W.,
Q
Rebel ooMm ece, rbd6cetlom
Spring 201E
4
4
e
$176
$698.9
albbid, Bid Bupp41% Armmaf hNdem queeBm4
Sprkp 20I6
a
12
14
$IB4
$fA00A
++
f,
MOeiMe (eewme3 urJeee ourkld Oou requlm rnam)
Spring ZOIB
a
12
B
S62B
$1,3456
�
DAIDC
SArkq 201E
B
10
4
$1,40
$2,067A
L
'
&*lard
..
'•
$3.520
Ulm rd b
Tn 574.:17R
0
ewr+rd+v Ardrlyda ie+m. :in:+ :y.•,
r—Lw7i+#ka 'Aral.. &—ineEW Ceobd, Areheeubp7 M
TOTAL - ALL DEWN WORK $41n31 seam $0 s6 $0 $103,423
2xtkeefx Aul>On fkrd$xl arpen rN pmn @. vjop ,Mfw. eY $4w
PROPOSED DESIG14 CONTRACT AMOUNT $105.491
fD%1.1Dr.0g(NnaM Rol" W W'V. Wn *ie
St0,Si9
TOTAL PROPOSED DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT $1116,040
Packet Pg. 275
7.10.b
Exhlbk B-3
City of Edmonds
Design Services for Edmonds Waterfront Redevelopment
Waterfront & Bulkhead
-M,\M'„ .
N z'
N'!7 5s0uc of Y2orkb Carrio tLlo P;�15 ROCIC414YI $I$CI�Sd0H.P16focv
Scope of work and Fee Proposal
C
Feepwad er0aderLadappeaNMda
N
3002NWOh SUM, SeaB4e, W.W.99117 f206) 7912670 fan f206) T033212 MeebeA ae.com
Iws. 5%.$O
C
Assumptions:
larderape Ard,ilttaxel, Ergkhewng cerAcee IwhA dedpn, pem4tlirg services br Bm Eb0 7be and nose Welalranl C mer eMnsine
Last updated 4 2017
VmnrenMedeveblxnanl and reeMalmrtMeedh wbm4hl, City will hare3amalnbremward respond Chtyiarcepomiblebr
Qi
eaamenle, anY Ices.detlireeon legal tlocumenb, and I[gal suppal
E
Mal brckged:
Pomil auMHhl (eas, CaroN.Mion adminlatraear
Timeline Mesh 207iJanvery 2076D'w'eMwA.lhrx Nl2d h»yy o,I�/—A fac-a W
(�
L
e...sy saw wq,n aepE
26%
BednerlaMsape RrdNeds
lMl SWLA leas
�r
a.sa,.naosgpertwwnran
ler9el dales
I+,s ,`.
... ,r., t>a
9dav sooerro Eno-
rare w,nwarq p tr
O
A. jcaL1fiu, $Ionolinu lrgvoslfgm11:pn§. aaIM Pralimirl Dal
-
+rl�
nu
1FF
lq`;i5ik
C)
R w>xa i�iiia,1-
�ra� a
Permit Roadmap plan and .. drofibn wlreem M g 25%Design
Spring 2017
4
1
/
$592 6
Q
(1) IOcknS and (1) Tam SR, Vbll
Spdrlg 2017
4
4
4 $047
$1,1434
(�
(1)Iniumvi Team Cmurdnaton Meetings
Spring 2017
-2
'7
3
$2223
(1) EWC Tam Cowdiatbn Meetings
SpNg 2017
7
1
:1
$2223
N
eackg-nd ReKaw
Spring 2017
1
4
4 $A.309
$1,%00
(3)Ciry Meetings
Spdnp 2017
1
1
a 11282
$1,7201
(2)Srskeholdr—finga
Spdng 2017
4
0
R
$3900
J
Geetachnkal 1-11gation
Ddaglcal Evelaton review
6pring2lin
Sprig 2017
1
7
1
7
1
1
$41,600 541,975.0
$1950
Y
SEPA Envimmkntal Checklist review
Spdrg 2017
1
7
a
11402
L
Final Coastal Engineering Report
Spdng2017
f
1
1 $5,016
35,301.0
O
Amhaaobgkal Research lorSEPA
Spring 2017
1
$10,0ee 110.344
3.1
Preliminary Promenade Architectural and Landeapa Design
Spring 2017
it
14
30
16,000 111.01"
Pnlbnlnery Bulkhead Engineering
Spring 2011
$4,180
K160
W
Millinery Stair Engineering
Spring 2017
$3,104
$3,104
a
Pnllminery Bach Malwhl Engineering
Spring 2017
$914
$014
r
Preliminary Grading and Paving Design
Spring 2017
1
3
1
$60510
V
25%Cal Ect'mete
SM,2017
2
0
$1,276
$1,6386
)
•0
Proed M (anagemenl, Meeting notes, OAdOC,AccmmOl6ce rg and OSupport
Spring 2017
12
10
0 $1,716
$24700
Update pmjed schedule
Spring 2017
1
3
1
$1261
L.
94
AS
B5
aublolal
M570
3ek6M
31U07 slhaea $BLCO $85,828
C
m
lwt.
E
Project phone conferences I cmorWnaeawl Tam during
Summer 2017
3
4
6
$3107
Q
Pwpplkalimn mee0rga,coondmallon M egendes in preparation for Fed State, and lily permitting
Summer 2017
4
4
$164
$3969
O
(2) Team Site Visits
Summer 2017
6
4
6
$4446
(2) lnlemai Team Coordinallon Meetings
Summer 2017
4
a
6
$3900
'
(2) EWC Tam Coordnallm Moorings
Summer 2017
4
4
4
$2964
G4abnminek,aN Praaaag Apron
Summer 2017
0
11
0
$BOOB
'a
Technkal Deacdp9m permils and responses to tech quese''ore
Summer 2017
2
4
$014
$9726
Update leak list toresperd to project permit reWlremems gathered dudng 25%design
Summer 2017
4
$2000
Design ReVatc.
Summer 2017
/
13
4
$6136
Updated 30 model and SimuisWrna
Summer 2017
1
10
16
$6617
Stakeholder engagamenl
Summer 2017
4
a
12
1462 S
G
60% Engineering Drannge
Summer 2017
$9,097
$9,0970
6-
Side Plan Engin er"
Summer 2017
a
2
10 $091
$1,2056
L
W.A. E�glneering
Summer 2017
$966
ON 0
Walkway 111,& 1EryOrseerkp
Bummar 2017
SID,274
$10.274
Shin Engineering
Summer 2017
$3,805
17,B06
Beach 6 Boulders Englnearing Revim
Sum-2017
$614
1514
60%C— Sheet (I sham)
Summer 2017
1
a
3
$1417
60% TESC I Demo Plan (2 sheep)
Summer 2017
1
3'
4
$1625
50% Gnding O Drainage plans (I sheet)
Sunn-2017
2
a
12
$3502
r
60% LARRY Plane (I eheal)
Summer 2011
2
a
12
$3582
50% Layout plain ll sheet)
Summer 2()
4
/0
12
$6100
50% Slle Secllmsll eha0
Summer 2017
4
1
12
$5660
50% Paving Pla(I shee0
Summer 2017
4
1
12
$5666
K
50%Souders. Material, Solle and Landscape plan(I ahead(
Sun-2017
7
4
12
f1,T/0
$0%WalsrlpM pameN4ti n6ahM gild helR and rtlWc stab 47 sheet)
50% LmdacapOrrlgatlon plan and details (2 sheahl
Sumraar2017
Summer 2017
a
1
/
2
12
5
5100 $2,060
$945
Review of 60% Set
Summer 2017
4
0
$3112
WORM HPA Parmk Appllca0ans review
Summer2017
1
1
3305
3
USACEaMEcraMPermit Appkcedon reWaw
PreconetruNm Fish Forage Survey review
Summer2017
Summer 2017
a
1
1
1
2
1
$670
$255
CriOal Area Report A..
Summer2017
1
1
1
$205
to
50% Modified CSl former ouilineeped0a6oro
S-2017
N
S
16 13,432
$4,4408
tL
60%Cost EsUmale
DARPA I Shoreline Permit submittal drawings(Sarkar RM CAD work only- not Included in If —scope)
Summer2017
Summer 2017
T2
14
1
1s
11 $1,001
60
S7,7134
$7ASO
r
54% AViNcrael DMpl Rohr Dcoxern 4 Pntk ,
Summa2017
a
10
20
36944
O
OA/QC Review o150%Set
Summer 2017
12
13
6 $1,799
$2,8469
L
Submit permit Anotalbns
Sumner 2017
42
a
16
$7124
154
204
306
d
subfolal
_
325,9J0
}yS.dn
— -
lit 30 $1h0Irl
Doo Lima rite
Maw la• +Lvrowas
—
6 --
an, mg Vj 0.7
1. M 11
1
d
Team SR.Vib
Fall 2017
6
4
4
$4446
Q
Team Cmo�nadon Meetings
Fs12017
6
4
0
$4446
(Q
Ccerdlnalkm mee0rgs with PermiWng Agencies
Fd12017
2
6
$2106
P-*d W Fsl wnr adwprajesl lNnH Eagin+enh gathered during 60% design
Fa112017
a
1
$2626
(j
Design Revbbns
Fa112017
a
6
75
$1046
84e Plan Englnearing
Fa112011
$1.230
$1,2375
Demolition Erglnewing
Fe112017
$765
$764 5
J
Walkway Bulkhad Engineering
Fat 2017
$0,009
$6,8090
Slake Empnadng
Fsh 2017
$4,279
$4.2790
6-
(1)
Search O B.M.n ReVrew
Fa02017
$614
$5140
Y
g0%EhegleeeAng Orawirgs
F612011
$7,196
77,190.4
L
90% Coverahesualta Plan (2 shears)
Fall 2M7
1
3
2
SM
(�
90% TESC I Demo Plans(2sheels)
Full 2017
1
I
1/
$3661
to
90% PIN Plan (I sheet)
Fail 2017
1
1
1
WIN
40%SaPnrd.uaNisld-"" 0.4e0e(?Aokaj
Fall 2017
2
4
/
$1,250
�r
00%paling, Including ariisgc and structural elements (1 sheet)
Fall 2017
6
4
14
$1,000 $3,310
90% Daekingand Flnbhea(1.Mat)
Fall 201T
4
4
It
$500 $2,00)
90% Cwil and Studurel plans and dehlb(2 sheets)
Fail 2017
2
4
1
12111
90% LandscsWirrigatbn pleru and delah(4 asset)
Fall 2017
3
11
]g
$1,0595
90% Cost Estimate
F9112011
4
4
1 $726
$1,0640
OA10C Review o190%Set
Fall 2011
0
A
4 $1.337
$2,2777
Front End Spevflatona
Fall 2017
20
tS
a
11.0608
y,e
a
Packet Pg. 276
Exhlbn 8.3
7.10.b
WMo99ped1eelWuw dbld—W•90% VWdAW CBl epedkd"
Fee 2017 22 2
10 $2,552
$3A36.6
B1MdAl9F91m0wk"
Fd 291T 6 9
26
4113
Lrrr jrr 'y - I,.e w
F911201T 0 9
25
$we
W01Y78hmWdKPbmBrdxdlW
y 2M7 2 9
26
$1126
_ ,.EWr
1pJ
I"
„eexr
fI9Al5
B2S]1+ S7 w 21560
S4fi.03L
���.�,�,��u� • lilllw
arar
Au9xh
sncn
��.
Trm Cw.wmon Ale9Wi99
WMer2017
4
4
$29eA
sm f4n End m%
ww zo17
$776
11mo
01mo9meom9dg
WW9r2017
$276
F276.0
WdwYNAMW En*..N
V",2017
$3,026
$3.026.0
SmA9Fn0-4
WMx2017
12,321
$2,3210
ewehd B6dd-RW W
WWx2017
$275
$Usa
FIn91 fh"p9
WWYer201T
12
16
24
S6,91e
$7.2106
Fmrd End SpKMcdm9
WbW2017
16
4
6
$le1.e
T.d"W spedd","
W.W2017
16
4
4
$2,739
63.417.0
100%Ca41ENl"
W W2017
12
2
12
F72a
$1,3662
C-W-00 bld W.M. —L-n2q
swo2ole
a
12
12
$7254
WWd aK.++2•. CM67Ao.a
5pfg201e
4
4
e
$265
$634e
0A 6PK 9d$*PA A9meKbft"R+O1
SpmA2016
0
12
14
$494
$1,3056
A%V0J44M'/ 3 wdos a b3 OM ft$"m ]
WV2019
a
12
a
$e09
$1.6409
t-m
$pg1T92e
9
16
4
11,714
$2.277.6
m96Yx ON% edky
106
f02
9E
cMh!
${(m
s169u w bl zn
$26,545
T—L"d1L-' pA.*d- SlM"ST On" Amwob9y M
TOTAL - ALL DESIGN WORN i64,964 $97,226 $41,690 $10,00 $4000 $221,913
�'., {9.. vr+ud tYry Tee rcr4o1 ogrcr44•s fa pwo-). mj r. pca r�+. nx 14,435
PROPOSED DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT6,391
14)5'. A1on,4tt 1 R. eny II• un'p ��,m WVY
TOTAL PROPOSED DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNT $248,987
Packet Pg. 277
7.10.c
t�i of EUAjp�Q Dave Earlin
City of Edmonds Mayor
121 FIFTH AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 ■ 425-771-0251
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ANC. 1$�n
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS
AND BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, P.S.
Dated May 3, 2017
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington (the "City") and Barker Landscape
Architects, P.S. (the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying professional services agreement
for the provision of landscape design and engineering services for the Edmonds Waterfront
Restoration Project ("Project"), dated May 3, 2017 ("Underlying Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, Barker Landscape Architects, P.S. is transferring its assets to
Environmental Works, an architectural and planning non-profit 501(c)(3) firm; Barker
Landscape Architects, P.S. desires to assign the Underlying Agreement to Environmental Works;
and Environmental Works has the ability and the desire to perform the Project services called for
by the Underlying Agreement under the terms set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Underlying Agreement provides that the services to be
provided by the Consultant pursuant to the Agreement may only be assigned with the express
written consent of the City; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Underlying Agreement to provide the City's
consent to the assignment and to document Environmental Works agreement to provide the
Project services in accordance with the terms thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by
and between the parties to the Underlying Agreement and Environmental Works as follows:
1. The City consents to the assignment of the Underlying Agreement of May 3, 2017
between the City and the Consultant for Project services, attached hereto as
Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth, from
Barker Landscape Architects, P.S. to Environmental Works.
2. Environmental Works agrees to take over the responsibilities of the Consultant to
provide the Project services called for by the Underlying Agreement in
accordance with the terms thereof.
Packet Pg. 278
7.10.c
Amendment No. I to Professional Services Agreement, Page 2
In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein.
DATED this �2 O day of 2018.
OF EDMONDS
e
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Passey, City . _
APPROVER AS TO FORM:
1
Office of the City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)ss
COUNTY OF )
BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, P.S.
By:
Its:
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
On thisZjQ �, day of 2018, before me, the under -signed, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appearedjOH u 1:� . on behalf of Barker Landscape Architects,
P.S., and executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be
his/her free and voluntary act and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on
oath stated that s/he was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
unw�u�unmQ
Notary Public x
State of`Washington
= PAMELA IACOPI GOULDER=
MY FEBRUA Y14 ON 2p U EXPIRES
piinunnnnnnnnnnuinuunuulni0
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Packet Pg. 279
Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement, Page 3
7.10.c
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of P� 1 2018, before me, the under -signed, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared on behalf of Environmental Works, and
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his/her free
and voluntary act and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that
s/he was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
oM AIRY PUBLIC
(ARV tn�:
Z = My commission expires:
... IFtI IIlk
W PS�
Packet Pg. 280
7.10.d
City of Edmonds Dave Earling
Mayor
121 FIFTH AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 9425-771-0251
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
C. 15V
AMENDMENT NO.2 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS
AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
(FORMERLY BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, P.S.)
Dated February 21, 2019
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington (the "City") and Barker Landscape
Architects, P.S. (the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying professional services agreement
for the provision of landscape design and engineering services for the Edmonds Waterfront
Restoration Project ("Project"), dated May 3, 2017 ("Underlying Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreement was amended by Amendment No. 1, dated
December 20, 2018 ("Amendment No. I"), to provide the City's consent to the assignment of the
Underlying Agreement to Environmental Works; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has determined that it is in the
best interests of the City to pay for the full parking lot and frontage improvements associated
with the Project, and as a result must amend the Underlying Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the design of the parking lot and frontage improvements requires a Site
Lighting Plan, resulting in an additional cost; and
WHEREAS, the City and Environmental Works desire to amend the Underlying
Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, to revise the scope of work and payment
provisions thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by
and between the parties to the Underlying Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth, as follows:
1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement shall
be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated
objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A.1 and Exhibit A.2, incorporated by this reference
as fully as if herein set forth.
Packet Pg. 281
Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement, Page 2
7.10.d
1.2 Payment. The $568,537 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying
Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include
an additional not to exceed amount of $118,820 for the additional scope of work identified in
Exhibit A to this Amendment No. 2. As a result of this Amendment No. 2, the total contract
amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $687,357 ($568,537 plus $118,820).
2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties, as amended
by Amendment No. I shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth
herein, but only as set forth herein.
DATED this day of , 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
By:
David O. Earling, Mayor
Its:
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Packet Pg. 282
Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement, Page 3
7.10.d
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2019, before me, the under -signed, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared on behalf of Environmental Works, and
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his/her free
and voluntary act and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that
s/he was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Packet Pg. 283
7.10.e
�t pi EUdf�b
City of Edmonds Dave Erling
Mayor
121 FIFTH AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 9425-771-0251
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AMENDMENT NO.3 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS
AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
(FORMERLY BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, P.S.)
Dated May 3, 2017
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington (the "City") and Barker Landscape
Architects, P.S. (the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying professional services agreement for
the provision of landscape design and engineering services for the Edmonds Waterfront
Restoration Project ("Project"), dated May 3, 2017 ("Underlying Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreement was amended by Amendment No. 1, dated
December 20, 2018 ("Amendment No. 1" ), to provide the City's consent to the assignment of the
Underlying Agreement to Environmental Works; and
WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreement was amended by Amendment No. 2, dated
February 21, 2019 ("Amendment No. 2"), to add additional scope of work and payment provisions
for a Site Lighting Plan, Parking lot and frontage improvement design; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has determined that it is necessary
to further revise the Scope of Work for the Underlying Agreement to remove certain services that
it has determined will not be needed at this time, and to add both engineering services relating to
the rebid process and construction support services for the Project, and as a result must again
amend the Underlying Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and Environmental Works desire to amend the Underlying
Agreement, as amended by Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, to further revise the Scope of Work and
to amend the payment provisions thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by
and between the parties to the Underlying Agreement, as amended by Amendments No. 1 and No.
2, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth, as follows:
Packet Pg. 284
7.10.e
.• 1114Vnibnow No 3 to Professional Set'riccs ,1grevnieni. PuK,, .'
I. Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the Underlying Agreement and
amendments thereto, shall be amended to remove certain services and to include the additional
services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached
Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
2. Payment. The $568,537 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the Underlying
Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, which was increased by
Amendment No. 2 to include an additional not to exceed amount of $118,820 for the additional
scope of work identified in Exhibit A to Amendment No. 2, is hereby further increased to include
an additional not to exceed amount of $178,465. As a result of this Amendment No. 3, the total
contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $865,822($568,537 plus
$1 18,820 plus $178,465).
3. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties, as amended
by Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein,
but only as set forth herein.
DATED this 5th day of August, 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS
By:
Its:
APPRO]l�D AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Packet Pg. 285
7.10.e
Amenchnent Ao 3 to Professional Seri ices Igiv mem, Page
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF NAG- )
On this 6 day of AO'C'Nr , 2019, before me, the under -signed, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared VUL41 AIDANV on behalf of Environmental Works, and executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary
act and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he was
authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
F
COB WYMAN
votary Public
e of WashingtonUBLIC
se Number 154991mmission Expires
u ust 02, 2023 My commission expires:
Packet Pg. 286
7.11
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Purchase of new Wastewater Pump for Lift Station 1
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Phil Williams
Background/History
Lift Station #1 on Sunset Avenue is the City's largest Wastewater pumping station. It pumps
approximately 60% of the City's total wastewater over the high ground on Sunset Avenue where it then
flows by gravity to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant. The pump station is a dry well/wet well
design with two identical pumps that are programmed to alternate back and forth as lead and lag
pumps. One pump at a time is generally sufficient to keep up with incoming flows, even during wet
weather. Occasionally, during very intensive storm events, two pumps may be needed to keep up. We
also have a spare pump in storage. This item was reviewed by the Parks and Public Works Committee on
September 14th, 2021 and recommended for the Consent Agenda
Staff Recommendation
Authorize the Mayor to sign a purchase order to buy a new Yeomans Chicago Bareshaft pump (YCC 6260
6615 3D) from Cascade Machinery & Electric for $127,545.12 plus shipping (not to exceed $1,500) to
add to the pump rotation at Lift Station 1.
Narrative
We have experienced ragging issues at Lift Station 1 in the past. This occurs when rags or other textiles
like non-flushable wipes, etc. get wrapped around the impellers of the pump causing it to overheat and
to eventually seize -up and/or break. This requires us to place the spare pump into service and send the
failed pump in for repair. When we sent this failed pump in for repair they repaired it but then told us it
could not be fixed again. It is now prudent to purchase a new pump to avoid not having a reliable spare
the next time one of these large pumps suddenly stops working.
Packet Pg. 287
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Public Hearing for Stormwater Management code (ECDC 18.30) update
Staff Lead: Zack Richardson
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Sydney Hall
Background/History
On July 13, 2021, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee.
On July 20, 2021, staff presented this item to City Council for review and comments.
Staff Recommendation
Consider public comment provided at the Public Hearing. Discuss possible changes or forward the item
for approval on a future consent agenda pending SEPA and Department of Commerce approval.
Background:
The City's municipal NPDES permit with the Washington Department of Ecology requires that the City
maintain adequate stormwater management code for new development in order to protect surface
waters. Each 5-year cycle of the permit requires an update to the City code to remain compliant with
the most current guidance from Ecology. The current permit requires that our codes be updated to
reflect their 2019 Surface Water Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) by July of
2022, but staff have proposed to have the new code effective 1/1/2022 for better clarity of application
of standards for future projects.
Narrative
The City must adopt drainage management code which is at least as protective as SWMMWW, but the
City does have the ability to add Edmonds -specific provisions which are in addition to Ecology
minimums. The difference between SWMMWW and Edmonds codes are managed in the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum (Addendum) so that the update to ECDC 18.30 is ultimately to adopt the 2019
SWMMWW as modified in the Addendum.
The revised versions of both ECDC 18.30 and the Addendum are attached in a clean version (as
proposed) and a redlined version, which tracked all changes between the current proposal and the
existing code. The changes since the previous version of the drainage code are summarized in
Attachment E (2022 ECDC 18.30 and Storm water Addendum Summary of Changes) and are broken into
three categories.
1. Ecology directed provisions, shown in orange, are revisions need to generally maintain
compliance with Ecology guidance. These are generally items that the City does not have the
ability to omit or revise in the code.
Packet Pg. 288
8.1
2. Staff -proposed revisions for clarity only, are shown in white, and generally will not impact
development. These revisions are predominantly to assist staff in communicating requirements
to designers and to assist with enforcement; they are not new impacts.
3. Staff -proposed revisions which are substantive changes, are shown in green, and would be
anticipated to have some potential for impact on development.
Ecology did a reorganization of the manual for the current version, so there are a fair number of changes
to their manual, but most are non -substantive. Most of the updates are reorganizational only and not
changes to requirements themselves. See Attachment G and Attachment F for more information on the
Ecology revisions.
Staff have proposed four substantive changes to the Edmonds -specific portions of code.
1. Changes to the way new connections of existing impervious surfaces are handled; revised to be
treated like new impervious and mitigated for in accordance with drainage code.
2. Removed Edmonds Way as 'direct discharge basin' and any corresponding exemptions; project
in Edmonds Way to be treated same as rest of City.
3. Increased protections of Perrinville Creek by (a) increasing the application of the City "retro-fit"
LID requirement and (b) increasing the flow control standard for projects within the basin.
4. Revising the LID BMP list so that the Edmonds -specific detention BMP is used for LID treatment
before the "perforate pipe connection" BMP
See the attached documents for more details on the changes and their anticipated impacts.
Attachments:
Attachment A—
Draft Ordinance
Attachment B —
Revised ECDC 18.30 (Clean)
Attachment C —
Revised Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (Clean)
Attachment D
— Revised ECDC 18.30 (Redlines)
Attachment E —
Revised Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (Redlines)
Attachment F — 2022 ECDC 18.30 and Stormwater Addendum Summary of Changes
Attachment G
— Ecology Executive Summary of the 2019 Revisions & Edmonds Response
Attachment H — Crosswalk: 2014 — 2019 SWMMWW
Attachment I — Presentation
Packet Pg. 289
8.1.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.30 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT," IN ITS
ENTIRETY.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds is a Department of Ecology Phase II Western
Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit holder; and
WHEREAS, as a Phase II permit holder, the City is required to update its stormwater code by
July XX 2022, to meet the minimum requirements of the 2019 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual
for Western Washington (SWWMM); and
WHEREAS, these requirements include reviewing and revising all development -related codes,
rules, and standards to incorporate and require Low Impact Development principles and best management
practices to make Low Impact Development the preferred and commonly used approach to site
development; and
WHEREAS, the goal of Low Impact Development is to infiltrate, disperse, and retain
stormwater runoff onsite to the extent feasible; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 18.30 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Stormwater Management," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto,
which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The existing text of chapter
18.30 ECDC shall be replaced entirely with the text shown in Attachment A.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Packet Pg. 290
8.1.a
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect upon the
latter of five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting
of the title and January 1, 2022.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MICHAEL NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED :
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 291
8.1.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.30 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT," IN ITS
ENTIRETY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 12021.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
Packet Pg. 292
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 18.30
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sections:
18.30.000 Purposes.
18.30.010 Definitions.
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
18.30.030 Applicability.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
18.30.050 Administration.
18.30.060 Requirements.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal.
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
18.30.000 Purposes.
Page 1/25
A. To set forth standards for managing stormwater runoff from construction and development sites to minimize
1. Degradation of surface water quality by controlling the scouring and sedimentation of creeks, streams,
wetlands, ponds, lakes, other water bodies.
2. Degradation of groundwater quality.
3. Damage to adjacent and other downstream private properties from erosion or other impacts from
stormwater runoff.
4. Damage of City -owned parcels, City roads, rights -of -way and associated infrastructure.
B. To comply with requirements in the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Municipal Stormwater Permit as issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology).
C. To complement site planning activities that minimize:
1. Impervious surfaces area.
2. The loss of native or non-native site vegetation.
3. The generation of stormwater runoff.
D. To make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site development; to
require LID be considered at the site planning stage; and to implement LID BMPs unless they are infeasible.
E. To require that all publicly -owned and privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control best
management practices (BMPs)/Facilities are operated, maintained and repaired in manner that conforms to this
chapter.
F. To provide the authority for the City to inspect privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control
BMPs/Facilities.
G. To provide enforcement procedures for ensuring compliance with this chapter.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 293
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 2/25
18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
Arterial. A road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets considered
collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to abutting
property. See also RCW 35.78.010, RCW 36.86.070, and RCW 47.05.021.
Adjustment. A variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments provide
substantially equivalent environmental protection.
Applicant. The owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or approvals
described in this chapter.
Approval. The proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public works
Director or their designee.
Best management practices (BMPs). The schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures,
and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the City that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or
reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters of Washington State.
Bioretention BMPs. Engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile, and
either retain or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2019 Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW), Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design specifications.
Category 1 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.I through No.5. See ECDC
18.30.60. C.
Category 2 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.1 through No.9. See ECDC
18.30.60.C.
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL). An individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
impact the quality of stormwater and, the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology approved erosion and sediment
control course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
City's municipal separate storm sewer system or "MS4." A conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads
with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains)
that are owned or operated by the City of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater, and
are not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 122.2, and which is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise designated by
Ecology pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26.
Clearing. The destruction and removal of vegetation by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
Commercial Agriculture. Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities involved
in the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial
agriculture when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain
idle for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or
unless the activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and
ongoing agricultural activity.
Common plan of development or sale. A site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be
taking place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but still under a single plan.
Examples include: 1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the separate phases or
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 294
8.1.b
Edmonds Page 3/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
filings/lots will be constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development where lots are
sold to separate builders); 2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still under a
consistent plan for long-term development; 3) projects in a contiguous area that may be unrelated but still under the
same contract, such as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and 4) linear
projects such as roads, pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the
disturbed area of the entire plan must be used in determine permit requirements.
Converted vegetation (areas). The change in land cover changed from native vegetation, pasture scrub/shrub, or
unmaintained non-native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or where native vegetation is converted to pasture.
Creek. Is synonymous with "streams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.320.
Detention facility. An above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores stormwater
runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system. There is little
or no infiltration of stored stormwater.
Development. Land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions from
timber land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of hard surface that is not part of a
routine maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or expansion
of a building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied in
Chapter 58.17 RCW
Director. The City's Public Works and Utilities Director or a designee with an appropriate background in
engineering or another related discipline.
Discharge point. The location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through
the City's MS4 facilitiesBMPs designed to infiltrate.
Ecology. The Washington State Department of Ecology
Effective impervious surface. Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to
a drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if. 1) the runoff is
dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 — "Full Dispersion," as
described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW; 2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in accordance with
downspout Full Infiltration Systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or 3) approved continuous
runoff modeling methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
Erodible or leachable materials. Wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or
chemical characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled,
uncovered process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
Erosion. The wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents, including
such processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water, wind, ice,
or gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
Excavation. The mechanical removal of earth material.
Exception. Relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
Fill. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
Groundwater. Water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body
Hard surface. An impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 295
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 4/25
Highway. A main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State Route 99, State Route
524, and portions of State Route 104, that are classified as principal arterials in the City's comprehensive
transportation plan.
Illicit discharge. Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the City's MS4, groundwaters, or a water body,
except as expressly allowed by ECDC Chapter 7.200.
Impervious surface. A non -vegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil
mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A non -vegetated surface area which causes water to run off
the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior
to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and
oiled, macadam or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered
retention/detention facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the
thresholds for application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities
shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be
considered impervious surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and
other areas that have modified runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or
low permeability liners are to be considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns,
landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, etc.) served by underdrains may be considered partially pervious if the
underdrain is set a minimum of 8 inches above the in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility
bottom.
Lake. An inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
Land disturbing activity. Any activity that results in a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and non -
vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing activities include but are not limited to demolition,
clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures and road
construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices, including
landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility maintenance
is not considered land disturbing activity if conducted according to established standards and procedures.
Low impact development (LID). A stormwater and land use strategy that strives to mimic pre -disturbance
hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation,
use of on -site features, site planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a
project design.
LID Best Management Practices (BMPs). Distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a project
design, that emphasize pre -disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and
transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof
downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water
re -use.
LID principles. Land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features, and
site planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
Maintenance. Repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and
equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse
hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of
structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities, including cases
where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as long as the
functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed,
fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to
stormwater facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up
pollutants (i.e., sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct
defects as identified in the maintenance standards of Appendix A, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 296
8.1.b
Edmonds Page 5/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Maximum extent practicable (MEP). Refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which
reads as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge
of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants.
MS4. The City's municipal separate storm sewer system.
Native vegetation. Vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds, indigenous to the coastal region
of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the site. Examples
include trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs
such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and
fireweed.
Natural drainage systems and outfalls. The location of the channels, swales, and other non -manmade conveyance
systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing for the subject property, either from
maps or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
New Development. Land disturbing activities, including Class IV -general forest practices that are conversions
from timberland to other uses; structural development, including construction or installation of a building or other
structure; creation of hard surfaces; and subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied
in Chapter 58.17 RCW. ECDC 18.30 does not distinguish the difference between new development and
redevelopment; all projects in Edmonds shall meet the requirements for new development.
New Impervious Surface. A surface that is: 1) changed from a pervious surface to an impervious surface (e.g.,
resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal"), asphalt, concrete, or an
impervious structure); or 2) upgraded from gravel to chip seal, asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure; or 3)
upgraded from chip seal to asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure. Note that if asphalt or concrete has been
overlaid by a chip seal, the existing condition should be considered as asphalt or concrete.
Outfall. A point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves the City's MS4 and enters
a surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes, tunnels, or other
conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to convey primarily
surface waters (i.e., culverts).
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs. A synonym for Low Impact Development BMPs.
Permeable pavement. Pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or porous
paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an aggregate base
that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
Pervious Surface. Any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include lawn,
landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
Person. Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or City government unit, however designated.
Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS). Those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS). Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities
(as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or
chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated
with an inert, non -leachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 297
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 6/25
Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS). Any pervious surface subject to 1) vehicular use, 2) industrial
activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); or 3) storage of erodible or leachable materials,
wastes, or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, 4) use of pesticides and
fertilizers, or 5) loss of soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and
landscaped areas including: golf courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
Pre -developed condition. The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-
American settlement. The pre -developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable,
historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
Project: Any proposed action to alter or develop a site.
Project site. That portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities, new hard
surfaces, or replaced hard surfaces. For projects that involve land disturbing activity on one or more parcels and/or
land disturbing activity in the City right-of-way, the "Project site" includes all areas of land disturbance. If the
project is part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be used in
determining permit requirements.
Rain garden. A non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and adapted
plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and to allow
stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
Receiving waterbody or Receiving waters. Naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water bodies,
such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a MS4
discharges.
Redevelopment. ECDC 18.30 does not distinguish the difference between new development and redevelopment; all
projects in Edmonds shall meet the requirements for new development. Where existing unmitigated surfaces are to
remain, the additional "retro-fit" requirement per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i
Replaced hard surface. For structures means the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the foundation.
For other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Replaced impervious surface. For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces down
to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and
replacement.
Roadway. Traveled hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
Road -related project. A project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of roadway,
shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded. Frontage improvements
constructed as a requirement for a development project are not consider a road -roadway project.
Runoff. Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams,
springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow ground water. It also means the portion of rainfall or
other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
Site. The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to development. For
road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site and the right-of-way boundaries
define the site. Note that drainage impacts are generally assessed for the "project site", under separate definition.
Slope. The degree of deviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio, percent, or in
degrees. Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the vertical distance
(rise), as 2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the horizontal
plane, with a 90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 298
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 7/25
Soil. The unconsolidated mineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that serves as a
natural medium for the growth of land plants.
Source control BMPs. A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with
storm water through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants.
The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control BMPs are physical,
structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater.
Operational Source Control BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering
stormwater. See Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
Stormwater facility. A constructed component of a stormwater drainage system, designed and constructed to
perform a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes,
swales, ditches, culverts, street gutters, detention ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices,
catch basins, oil/water separators, and biofiltration swales.
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The Washington State Department of
Ecology's 2019Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Referred to as the 2019 SWMMWW
Stormwater site plan. The comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary
for regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed development project for compliance with stormwater requirements.
Contents of the Stormwater Site Plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site
characteristics. It includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Construction SWPPP) and a
Permanent Stormwater Control Plan (PSC Plan). Guidance on preparing a Stormwater Site Plan is contained in
Chapter 3 of Volume I of the SWMMWW.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/Facilities. Detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No.6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No.7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
Threshold discharge area. An area within a project site draining to a single natural discharge location or multiple
natural discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest
flowpath). The examples in Figure 1: Example TDA Delineations below,illustrate this definition. The purpose of
this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 299
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Figure 1: Example TDA Delineations
Page 8/25
Example of a Project Site
Example of a Project Site
Example of a Project Site with
with a single natural
with multiple natural
multiple natural discharges and
discharge and a single TDA
discharges and a single TDA
multiple TDAs
'
.._.�'---
Jy ,TDA -
TDA
Single
- TDA
2
Natural
r
Natural J 1
Natural
discharge Greater than
location
discharge
discharge
1I4 mile
locations
114 milelocations r ` 114 miles
f
1/4 mile
i
i
Example of a road project with multiple
d1wharge points and a single TDA
o
mBecause the right -most discharge
. connecls to the other two discharge flow
�I roadway crown
paths within I mite, all areas are
�i connected as one TDA.
Discharge 114 mde 114 mile
location — -
114 mile -.
c
S
3 / Example of a road project with multiple
` / discharge points and multiple TDAs.
�1 Note: Shaded
areas represent
- Discharge 11+i mle the limits of the
location project site.
11
4 NOT TO SCALE
Example TDA Delineations
DEPARTMENT OF Revised March 2018
ECOLOGYPlease see http.IA+vwwecyy wa.govloopyright htmf for copyright notice including permissions,
State of Washington limitation of liability, and disclaimer.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 300
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 9/25
Vehicular Use. Regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are subject to
regular vehicular use: roads, un-vegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway,
driveways, parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: sidewalks not subject to drainage from roads for
motor vehicles, paved bicycle pathways separated from and not subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles,
restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance access roads.
Waterbody. Surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
Waters of the state. Includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR Subpart 122.2 within
the geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW which
includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters
and water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
Wetlands. As defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
A. The Public Works and Utilities Director shall administer this chapter and shall be referred to as the Director.
B. The Director shall have the authority to develop, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to administer
and enforce this chapter per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120, such as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
C. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less
protective of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective
requirements shall prevail.
D. The Director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements on a project or site to meet the purpose of
this chapter based on site -specific factors including, but not limited to, location, soil conditions, slope, and
designated use.
E. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do
they indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local
laws and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
F. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental
impacts, and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.030 Applicability.
A. This chapter applies to applications:
1. Submitted on or after January 1, 2022, and
2. Submitted prior to January 1, 2017, which have not started construction by January 1, 2022, and
3. Submitted prior to January 1, 2022, which have not started construction by July 1, 2027.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 301
Edmonds Page 10/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
B. This chapter applies to the following actions on sites that discharge to the City's MS4 or discharges to waters of
the state whether or not a City -issued permit is required:
1. Land -disturbing activity, or
2. Creation of new hard surfaces, or
3. Replacement of existing hard surfaces, or
4. Conversion of pervious surfaces, or
5. New connections to the City's MS4, or
6. Any other actions that can increase the volume or rate of stormwater runoff, or cause the generation of
pollutants, from the site.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
A. Full Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
1. Forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from timberland to other uses, are exempt from the provisions of the minimum requirements.
2. Commercial agriculture practices that involve working land for production are generally exempt. However,
land conversion from timberland to agriculture and the construction of impervious surfaces are not exempt.
3. Construction of drilling sites, waste management pits, and associated access roads, and construction of
transportation and treatment infrastructure such as pipelines, natural gas treatment plants, natural gas
pipeline compressor stations, and crude oil pumping stations are exempt. Operators are encouraged to
implement and maintain best management practices to minimize erosion and control sediment during and
after construction activities to help ensure protection of surface water quality during storm events.
4. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are exempt: pothole and square -cut patching,
overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of
coverage, shoulder grading, reshaping/regrading drainage systems, crack sealing, resurfacing with in -kind
material without expanding the road prism, pavement preservation activities that do not expand the road
prism, and vegetation maintenance.
B. Partial Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are partially exempt from the
provisions of this chapter:
1. Underground utility projects that replace the ground surface with in -kind material or materials with similar
runoff characteristics are only subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2, Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention.
a. Utility installations as part of a development project, whether in the right-of-way or on private
property, are not considered an underground utility project for the sake of this partial exemption.
2. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are considered development, and therefore are
not categorically exempt.
a. Removing and replacing a paved surface to base course or a lower level, or repairing the pavement
base: These are considered replaced hard surfaces.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 302
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 11/25
b. Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism or paving graveled
shoulders: these are considered new hard surfaces.
c. Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, asphalt, or concrete; or upgrading from gravel to asphalt
or concrete; or upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal") to asphalt or concrete:
these are considered new hard surfaces.
18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The Director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by ECDC 18.30.050.A.3 for
compliance with this chapter when:
a. An application for a City permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC Title 18 or 19, or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
2. In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
Stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable City code, a Stormwater Site Plan as described in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (see
ECDC 18.30.060) and any other information required by the Director.
B. Inspections.
1. The Director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential, and
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components, and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed, and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
Stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities, and
e. Post -Construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
2. When reasonably required by the Director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with
local, state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by
the applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in ECDC Chapter 15.00 shall be paid.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 303
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
18.30.060 Requirements.
Page 12/25
A. Documents. The sources of the stormwater management requirements for the City are from the following
documents:
1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification date August 1,
2019
2. 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
In the event of conflicts between the various provisions, the more stringent provision shall apply.
B. Illicit Discharges and Connections. Non-stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, into the MS4,
groundwaters, or a water body from any developed or undeveloped lands are prohibited per ECDC Chapter
7.200.
C. Thresholds and Applicability
1. The thresholds outlined in this section are only applicable to ECDC 18.30.060.C. See also the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for supplemental information on thresholds.
a. All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
b. Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5. Category 1
includes projects that:
i. Result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
c. Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9. Category 2
includes projects that:
i. Result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
iii. Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
2. Additional Requirements for road -related projects. For road -related projects, runoff from the new and
replaced hard surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and sidewalks) and the converted vegetation
areas shall meet all the minimum requirements only if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more
and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits. Otherwise, the minimum
requirements only apply to the new hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas that exceed the
thresholds in (1) above. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the width of the
right-of-way.
3. New Connections to the City's MS4 when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the
definition of development. Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but that wish to connect
directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval.
For sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of hard surface area to the City's
MS4, the project shall comply with the requirement of this chapter, treating all hard surfaces to be drained
to the City system as new hard surfaces, unless applicant can demonstrate that the site will discharge in the
same manner and quantities prior to the proposed project. Applicant shall account for natural dispersion
and/or infiltration which may be occurring if these new hard surfaces area currently drain through pervious
areas.
4. Minimum Requirements may be met for an equivalent (flow and pollution characteristics) area. The
equivalent area may be within the same TDA. If the equivalent area is outside the TDA, or off -site, the
equivalent area must drain to the same receiving water and the guidance for equivalent facilities using in -
basin transfers must be followed, as detailed in Appendix D of Volume 1 of SWMMWW.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 304
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 13/25
D. Minimum Technical Requirements. This section describes the minimum technical requirements for stormwater
management at development sites.
1. Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
The City shall require a Stormwater Site Plan from all projects meeting the thresholds in ECDC
18.30.060.C. Stormwater Site Plans shall use site -appropriate development principles to retain native
vegetation and minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum.
2. Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
a. Thresholds:
i. All development projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment
and other pollutants into receiving waters. Compliance with this minimum requirement can be
achieved for an individual site if the site is covered under Ecology's General NPDES Permit
for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities and fully implementing
the requirements of that permit.
ii. A Construction SWPPP is required for all projects which a) result in 2,000 square feet or
more of new plus replaced hard surface area, b) where a structure with an exterior hard
surface area of at least 2,000 square feet is being demolished, c) which disturb 7,000 square
feet or more of land, or d) when the site falls within the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard
Area, Landslide Hazard Area or steep slope critical area. Projects that do not meet any of the
above criteria are not required to prepare a Construction SWPPP, but must consider all of the
elements listed below for Construction SWPPPs and develop controls for all Construction
SWPPP elements that pertain to the project site.
b. General Requirements:
i. The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in
. the narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation
to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project. Each of the
thirteen elements referenced below must be considered and included in the SWPPP unless site
conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly
justified in the narrative of the SWPPP.
ii. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted
pursuant to an approved site development plan (e.g., building permit, subdivision approval)
that establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling. These permitted
clearing and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas,
buffers, native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas as required by the City,
shall be delineated on the site plans and the development site.
iii. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final
stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs
contained in Chapter 4 of Volume II of the SWMMWW.
c. Seasonal Work Limitations:
From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities may only be
authorized by the City if it can be demonstrated that silt -laden runoff will be prevented from leaving
the site through a combination of the following:
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 305
Edmonds Page 14/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
i. Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to
receiving waters; and
ii. Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
iii. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d
below.
Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the City may expand or restrict the
seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing
and grading limitations, except for sites lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020.F:
Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs,
ii. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the
soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil, and
iii. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the
site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities.
d. Construction SWPPP Elements
Construction SWPPP elements are required in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 3.4.2 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
3. Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution
All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the
City. Source control BMPs must be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with Volume IV of
the SWMMWW. All single family residential projects shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs
from SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
4. Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural
location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project
site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient
properties. The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the
ultimate outfall location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require
energy dissipation.
To demonstrate compliance with this core requirement, all projects shall submit an off -site qualitative
analysis. If an existing problem (or potential future problem after development) is identified, mitigation
will be required to prevent worsening of that problem. A quantitative analysis may be required for any
project deemed to need additional information or where the project proponent or the City determines that a
quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance system.
See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on complying with this requirement.
5. Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management
a. Applicability:
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs are required in accordance with the following project
thresholds, standards, and lists to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on -site to the extent
feasible without causing flooding or erosion impacts. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 306
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
b. Project Thresholds:
Page 15/25
There are five project scenarios outlined below that determine the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management. The first four scenarios apply to projects that
discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4. The fifth scenario applies to project discharges that
do not enter the City's MS4. Note that more than one of the five scenarios may apply to a given
proj ect:
Retrofit. Projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain
existing hard surfaces on the parcel or common plan of development that do not drain to an
approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs to manage a portion of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after
project completion. BMPs from List No.1 (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d) shall be applied to a
minimum of 25 percent of those existing unmanaged surfaces, but to no more than the area
equal to the proposed new plus replaced hard surfaces.
Within the Perrinville Creek basin, the retrofit value shall be increased from 25% to 50%.
Only for those existing unmanaged hard surfaces that remain after project completion,
applicants are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for
these existing surfaces (as is required under ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b [ii] and [iii] below).
However, if it is determined that the minimum percentage requirement cannot be met due to
BMP infeasibility, documentation of BMP infeasibility is required. In addition, when runoff
from unmanaged hard surfaces is mixed with runoff from managed hard surfaces, those BMPs
must be selected and designed for all areas which contribute runoff to the BMP (per sections
[ii] and [iii] below). See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for
additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
ii. This requirement is specific to minimum requirement #5 only. The surfaces treated by this
requirement do no need to be added to project thresholds or mitigated under other minimum
requirements. Impervious surfaces disturbed solely for installation of BMPs proposed to
satisfy this requirement need not be consider as replaced hard surfaces for the
project. Category 1. Category 1 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's
MS4 and are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5 (per
ECDC 18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.l for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iii. Category 2. Category 2 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4
and are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.2 for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may
choose to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iv. Direct Discharge Requirement. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the
City's MS4 (in accordance with the restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound
presented in Section 3.4.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 307
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 16/25
Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full
dispersion, but must implement BMP T5.13 (Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth); BMPs
T5.10A Downspout Full Infiltration Systems, T5.1013 Downspout Dispersion Systems, or
T5.1013 Perforated Stub -out Connections; and BMP T5.11 Concentrated Flow Dispersion or
T5.12 Sheet Flow Dispersion; if feasible for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land
disturbed. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details
on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility
V. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to implement
one of the following:
a. Project sites may discharge to the downstream private property (e.g., projects located
above BNSF property) with approval from the downstream property owner(s).
b. Project sites may discharge runoff to an on -site system.
For sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, a geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical
engineer is required for the on -site system. On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs from List No.I in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d shall be
evaluated for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed.
Projects are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document
infeasibility. The project applicant may be subject to an extra permit
processing fee for City review of the geotechnical analysis. Projects are
required to comply with all other applicable City requirements, such as
ECDC 19.10 (earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas).
ii. For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii shall be
followed to evaluate site appropriate BMP's.
c. Subject to prior approval by the City, project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's
MS4. A quantitative downstream analysis in accordance with Minimum Requirement
No. 4 and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum will be required. If the City's MS4 does
not have adequate capacity to receive the applicant's pumped flows, the applicant is
required to install an on -site detention system to store runoff and pump it to the MS4 at
an approved rate.
vi. Projects under 2,000 SF of new plus replaced hard surfaces which discharge to an existing
BMP with a surfaces overflow, shall expand the BMP size for the proposed new plus replaced
hard surfaces based on existing design data.
Alternatively, or where existing design data can not be found, the project shall
discharge to a separate system appropriate sized per the designer.
c. LID Performance Standard
For projects that elect to meet the LID Performance Standard to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii)
and (iii), Stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations
for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 8 percent of the 2-year peak flow to 50 percent of
the 2-year peak flow from the project site. Refer to the Standard Flow Control Requirement section in
Minimum Requirement No. 7 for information about the assignment of the pre -developed condition.
Project sites that must also meet Minimum Requirement No. 7 shall match flow durations between 8
percent of the 2-year flow through the full 50-year flow.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 308
Edmonds Page 17/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
i. Projects meeting the LID performance criteria are still required to comply with the
requirements for BMP T5.13: Post -Construction Soils Quality and Depth, to the maximum
extent feasible.
d. List No.I for Category 1 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
For projects that elect to use List No. 1 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum; and Competing Needs
Criteria listed in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
iii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14 or Bioretention in accordance with BMP T7.30
of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or bioretention facility must have a
minimum horizontal projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of
the area draining to it.
iv. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1 OB in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
vi. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Full infiltration for equivalent surfaces areas per BMP T5.10A and/or Permeable Pavement in
accordance with BMP T5.15 in Volume V of the SWMMWW, or
iii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14 or Bioretention in accordance with BMP
T7.30of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or bioretention facility must have a
minimum horizontal projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of
the area draining to it.
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
e. List No.2 for Category 2 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 309
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 18/25
For projects that elect to use List No. 2 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (iii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW; and Competing Needs Criteria listed in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.I OA in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
iii. Bioretention in accordance with BMP T7.30 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain
garden or bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below
the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iv. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1 OB in Volume III of the
SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
vi. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Volume III of the
SWMMWW.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Full infiltration for equivalent surfaces areas per BMP T5.I OA in Volume III of the
SWMMWW and/or Permeable pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
iii. Bioretention (See Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum horizontally
projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total surface area
draining to it.
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
Overflows: All non -dispersion BMPs sized solely for Minimum Requirement #5 are anticipated to
have an overflow discharge on a semi -regular basis and therefore requires a sub -surface piped
connection directly to the MS4 system.
i. In order to eliminate a piped overflow connection, the project shall be designed to infiltrate
100% of the modelled 100-year storm per continuous modeling. A safe and certain surface
overflow path must still be provided and may not negatively impact adjacent properties.
ii. In cases where the City MS4 is not in a location where a reasonable connection can be made
for a project in capable of fully infiltrating per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.£i above:
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 310
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 19/25
• Extensions equal to or less than the length of the project frontage would be anticipated
and generally not consider for an exception to 18.30.060.D.5.f.i.
• Extension exceeding the project frontage length will be considered on a case -by -case
basis for exception to 18.30.060.D.5.f.i.
6. Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment
a. Project Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only
consider those hard and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces
and the converted vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment
facilities:
Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or
more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or
ii. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including
permeable pavements — is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
b. Treatment -Type Thresholds and Facility Sizing:
Treatment -Type Thresholds in accordance with Section 1.2, Volume III of the SWMMWW
Phosphorus treatment shall be required for projects draining to Hall Creek and Lake
Ballinger.
ii. Treatment Facility Sizing, including Water Quality Design Storm Volume, Water Quality
Design Flow Rate, and Downstream Facilities, in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 3.4.6,
Volume I of the SWMMWW.
c. Treatment Facility Selection, Design, and Maintenance
Stormwater treatment facilities shall be:
Selected in accordance with the process identified in Chapter 1 of Volume III of the
SWMMWW,
ii. Designed in accordance with the design criteria in Volume V of the SWMMWW, and
iii. Maintained in accordance with the maintenance schedule in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
d. Additional Requirements
The discharge of untreated stormwater from pollution -generating hard surfaces to ground water
will not be authorized by the City except for infiltration or dispersion of runoff through BMPs
designed and implemented per ECDC 18.30 and SWMMWW.
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control
a. Applicability: Flow control is required on projects meeting the thresholds summarized below to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions.
Flow control in accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that
discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound subject to the restrictions of
the TDA Exemption (aka. direct discharge exemption) per SWMMWW Section 3.4.7 of Volume I
(other minimum requirements may still apply). See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 3.4.7 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 311
Edmonds Page 20/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
If the discharge drains to a stream that leads to a wetland, or to a wetland that has an outflow to a
stream, both this minimum requirement (Minimum Requirement No. 7) and Minimum Requirement
No. 8 apply.
b. Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider only
those impervious, hard, and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces
and the converted vegetation areas. The following circumstances require achievement of the standard
flow control requirement for western Washington:
Projects in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more in a
threshold discharge area, or
ii. Projects that convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or convert 2.5
acres or more of native vegetation to pasture in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there is a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site, or
iii. Projects that through a combination of hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas cause a
0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs) increase or greater in the 100-year flow frequency from a
threshold discharge area as estimated using the Western Washington Hydrology Model or
other approved model and one -hour time steps (or a 0.15 cfs increase or greater using 15-
minute time steps).
Standard Flow Control Requirement (applies to discharges directly or indirectly to the City's MS4,
except for projects that meet the direct discharge requirements outlined in "a" above and/or projects
discharging to Perrinville Creek): Stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to
pre -developed durations for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 50 percent of the 2-year
peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow. The pre -developed condition to be matched shall be a
forested land cover unless reasonable, historic information is available that indicates the site was
prairie prior to settlement (modeled as "pasture" in the Western Washington Hydrology Model). This
standard requirement is waived for sites that will reliably infiltrate all the runoff from hard surfaces
and converted vegetation areas.
d. Perrinville Basin Flow Control Standard (applies to all discharges within the Perrinville Creek basin)
shall be an elevated level of flow control design. Discharges to the Perrinville Creek Basin shall
maintain the durations of high flows at their predevelopment levels for all flows greater than one-half
of the 2-year flow up to the 50-year flow AND holding the 100-year peak flow rate at its
predevelopment level. The predevelopment peak flow rates for the 2-year and 10-year runoff events
are also intended to be maintained.
e. Additional Requirement: Flow Control BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in
accordance with Volume III of the SWMMWW or an approved equivalent.
8. Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetlands Protection
a. Applicability: The requirements below apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a
wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system.
b. Thresholds: The thresholds identified in Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment, and
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control shall also be applied to determine the applicability of
this requirement to discharges to wetlands.
c. Standard Requirement: Projects shall comply with Guide Sheets No. 1 through No. 3 in Appendix I-D
of the SWMMWW. The hydrologic analysis shall use the existing land cover condition to determine
the existing hydrologic conditions unless directed otherwise by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 312
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 21/25
d. Additional Requirements: Stormwater treatment and flow control facilities shall not be built within a
natural vegetated buffer, except for:
Necessary conveyance systems as approved by the City; or
ii. As allowed in wetlands approved for hydrologic modification or treatment in accordance with
Guide Sheet 2 in Appendix I-D of the SWMMWW.
An adopted and implemented basin plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of
Appendix 1 of the Phase II NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
9. Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance
An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of
the SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The
party (or parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and
maintenance manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance
manual shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the
property to the new owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be
retained in the appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken
shall be kept and be available for inspection.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeals.
A. Exceptions.
1. The Director may approve a request for an exception to the minimum requirements of this chapter
following legal public notice of an application for an exception and of the Director's decision on the
application. All legal public notice related to this request for an exception shall be in the manner prescribed
in ECDC 20.03.002 and the applicant shall pay all costs to publish the legal public notices required by this
provision. The Director shall provide and keep written findings of fact of the decision.
2. The approval of the exception shall only be granted when the applicant demonstrates that the requirement
would cause a severe and unexpected economic hardship. To determine whether the requirement imposes a
severe and unexpected economic hardship on the project applicant, the applicant must document for City
review and approval, all of the following, at a minimum:
a. The current, pre -project use of the site; and
b. How application of the requirement(s) for which an exception is being requested restricts the proposed
use of the site compared to the restrictions that existed prior to adoption of this chapter; and
c. The possible remaining uses of the site if the exception were not granted; and
d. The possible uses of the site that would have been allowed prior to the adoption of this chapter; and
e. A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements
versus the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of requirements that existed prior
to adoption of the requirements of this chapter; and
f. The feasibility of the applicant to alter the project to apply the requirements of this chapter.
3. Any exception must meet the following criteria:
a. The exception will not increase risk to the public health and welfare, nor be injurious to other
properties in the vicinity and/or downstream, and to the quality of waters of the state; and
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 313
Edmonds Page 22/25
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
b. The exception is the least possible exception that could be granted to comply with the intent of the
minimum requirements.
4. An exception to the requirements shall only be granted to the extent necessary to provide relief from the
economic hardship as determined by the Director, to alleviate the harm or threat of harm to the degree that
compliance with the requirement becomes technically feasible, or to perform the emergency work that the
Director determines is warranted.
5. The Director may require an applicant to provide additional information at the applicant's expense,
including (but not limited to) an engineer's report or analysis.
6. When an exception is granted, the Director may impose new or additional requirements to offset or mitigate
harm or the threat of harm that may be caused by granting the exception, or that would have been
prevented if the exception had not been granted.
B. Adjustments.
1. The Director may approve a request for adjustments to the requirements of this chapter when the Director
finds that:
a. The adjustment provides substantially equivalent environmental protection; and
b. The objectives of safety, function, environmental protection, and facility maintenance are met, based
on sound engineering practices.
During construction, the Director may require, or the applicant may request, that the construction of
drainage control facilities and associated project designs be adjusted if physical conditions are discovered
on the site that are inconsistent with the assumptions on which the approval was based, including (but not
limited to) unexpected soil or water conditions, weather -generated problems, or changes in the design of
the improved areas; and
A request by the applicant for an adjustment shall be submitted to the Director for review and approval
prior to implementation. The request shall be in writing and shall provide facts substantiating the
requirements of subsection (C)(1) of this section, and if made during construction, the factors in subsection
(C)(2) of this section. Any such modifications made during the construction of drainage control facilities
shall be included with the final approved drainage control plan.
C. Appeal.
1. The Director's decision on an application for an exception or adjustment may appeal to the hearing
examiner in accordance with a Type II appeal process in ECDC Chapter 20.06.
2. The applicant shall carry the burden of proof.
3. The decision of the hearing examiner is appealable to superior court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C
RCW. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City to inspect or perform any duty imposed upon the
City by this Title. The City shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. If the
responsible party fails to respond within seven days from the receipt of notification, the City may order the work
required to be completed or otherwise address the cause of improper access. The obligation for the payment of all
cost that may be incurred or expended by the City in causing such work to be done shall be imposed on the person
holding title to the subject property.
B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity
such as an individual, corporation, or homeowner's association. The maintenance covenant shall address or append
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 314
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 23/25
requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance the applicable BMP(s). Maintenance
covenants shall be as specified in City Engineering Division documents or approved by the Director, and recorded
with Snohomish County and on all proper deeds [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of stormwater facilities is essential for the protection of the City's
MS4 and the environment.
A. Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and maintained per
the requirements of Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance
standard, the owner shall develop a standard based on guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered
professional engineer and submit the standards to the Director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance
standard is to determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's
required condition at all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not
a violation of this chapter.
B. Ownership. Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All stormwater facilities
that serve private property are private, unless an agreement between the property owner and the City states
otherwise. Stormwater facilities that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also
are private. The City may offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private storm
drainage facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The City shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the Stormwater Utility.
D. Maintenance and Inspection of Permanent Facilities. All privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls
shall be maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in the SWMMWW. The Owner
shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts, and monitoring results. The records shall
catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was taken, how it was done, and any problems
encountered or follow-up actions required. The records shall be made available to the City upon request. The Owner
shall maintain a copy of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make
reference to such document in real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real
property served by the privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to
maintain such facilities or controls.
E. City Inspection of private stormwater facilities. The City shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including low impact development stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the City may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by the a state or Federal program provided that the
City makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering
and presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the Director shall have
recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including but not limited to, obtaining an administrative
warrant for entry.
G. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately -owned stormwater facility
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of ECC 7.200 shall apply.
H. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the City, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility.
If a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on
a recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 315
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 24/25
shall rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or
finally, with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located.
I. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC,
guidelines for disposal of waste materials from storm water maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the
Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
A. General enforcement action shall be in accordance with this chapter whenever a person has violated any
provision of this chapter. The choice of enforcement action is at the discretion of the City.
B. Civil Penalties Adopted. ECDC Chapter 20.110 enforcement procedures are herein adopted in full, as modified in
this chapter, with the proviso that repeat offenders or violations deemed an immediate public hazard shall be subject
to compliance and appeal timelines as deemed appropriate by the Director based on the specific nature of the
violation.
C. Maintenance Orders. The Director shall have the authority to issue to an owner or person an order to maintain or
repair a component of a stormwater facility or BMP to bring it into compliance with this chapter, the SWMMWW,
the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, and the Edmonds Community Development Code. The order shall include:
1. A description of the specific nature, extent and time of the violation and the damage or potential damage
that reasonably might occur;
2. A notice that the violation or the potential violation cease and desist and, in appropriate cases, the specific
corrective actions to be taken; and
3. A reasonable time to comply, depending on the circumstances.
D. Civil Penalty. A person who fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter, who fails to conform to an
approval or order issued, who undertakes development without first obtaining approval, or who fails to comply with
a stop work order issued under these regulations shall be subject to a civil penalty levied in accordance with the
provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.110; provided, however, that the appeal process shall commence with a notice of
violation as provided in ECDC 20.110.040.13.
1. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter
20.110; provided, however, that in addition to the penalties set forth in that chapter, the hearing examiner
is authorized to levy a penalty of up to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per occurrence based upon an
assessment of the following factors. Where such factors are present, the hearing examiner is authorized to
levy such penalty after taking into consideration the full impact of the violation and any mitigating
circumstances (see subsection (2) below):
a. The violation created a risk to public health and the significance of the risk.
b. The violation damaged the environment and the significance of the damage.
c. The violation caused damage to public and private property and the significance of such damage.
d. A history of similar violations, if any.
e. The economic benefit of the violations, if any, to the person or entity responsible for the violations.
2. Mitigating circumstances which may be used to offset or reduce the time resulting from the application of
the preceding factors are limited to:
a. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and no history of similar violations.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 316
8.1.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 25/25
b. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and a history of one or two similar violations
(lesser reduction).
c. A "voluntary compliance agreement' is defined as a legally binding agreement entered into between
the City and the alleged violators, by which the violator(s) acknowledge the existence of the violation,
waive all appeal rights, and agree to and do pay a fine in an amount stipulated to between the violator
and the City.
If the violation(s) are not corrected as ordered, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into
within that time period and no appeal is filed, the penalty for the next 15-day period shall be 150 percent of
the initial penalties, and the penalties for the next 15-day period shall be 200 percent of the initial penalties.
The intent of this subsection is to increase penalties beyond the maximum penalties stated as an additional
means to achieve timely compliance.
Unless otherwise provided in a voluntary compliance agreement, civil penalties shall be paid within 30
days of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. Payment of the civil penalties
assessed under this chapter does not relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or
her duty to correct the violation or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued
pursuant to this chapter.
The City may suspend immediate payment of civil penalties if the person responsible for a code violation
has entered into a voluntary compliance agreement. Penalties shall begin to accrue again pursuant to the
terms of the voluntary compliance agreement if any necessary permits applied for are denied, canceled or
not pursued, if corrective action identified in the voluntary compliance agreement is not completed as
specified, or if the property is allowed to return to a condition similar to that condition which gave rise to
the voluntary compliance agreement; provided, however, that additional penalties shall not be imposed
until additional notice and opportunity for hearing have been provided in accordance with ECDC Chapter
20.110.
Civil penalties assessed create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a code
violation.
E. The determination of the hearing examiner issued in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110 shall be appealable
to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW.
F. The remedies provided for in this section shall not be exclusive. The City may also use other civil and
administrative remedies available to it, including but not limited to the remedies provided in ECDC Title 19 and the
state building and dangerous buildings codes.
Version: July 2021
Packet Pg. 317
8.1.c
ADDENDUM TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18.30
(EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM)
j
oAp
^�C
�g�O
July 2021
Packet Pg. 318
8.1.c
U
a
Packet Pg. 319
OCTOBER 2021
8.1.c
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
CONTENTS
1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1
2 How to Use this Addendum......................................................................................................3
2.1
SWMMWW Volume I......................................................................................................3
2.2
SWMMWW Volume 11.....................................................................................................4
2.3
SWMMWW Volume III....................................................................................................4
2.4
SWMMWW Volume IV...................................................................................................4
2.5
SWMMWW Volume V.....................................................................................................5
2.6
Addendum Content Not Covered in the SWMMWW......................................................5
3 Applicability of the Minimum Requirements...........................................................................7
3.1
Thresholds and Applicability............................................................................................9
3.1.1 Additional Requirements for Road -Related Projects.........................................9
3.1.2 New Connections to the City's MS4..................................................................9
3.1.3 Comparisons to the SWMMWW.....................................................................10
4 Project Basin Location and Applicable Requirements...........................................................11
4.1
Determining Downstream Receiving System(s).............................................................11
4.2
Other Considerations.......................................................................................................
I I
5 Project Minimum Requirements.............................................................................................13
5.1
Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans ..........................13
5.2
Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan 13
5.3
Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution.........................................13
5.4
Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and
Outfalls............................................................................................................................14
5.5
Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -Site Stormwater Management................................15
5.6
Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment.........................................................17
5.6.1 Edmonds -Specific Oil and Floatables Control.................................................18
5.7
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control................................................................18
5.8
Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetland Protection.......................................................18
5.9
Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance.........................................19
6 Additional Requirements........................................................................................................21
6.1
Protection of LID Facilities During Construction...........................................................21
6.1.1 General Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs Applicable to LID...................21
6.1.2 Additional Construction Techniques for LID BMPs........................................22
edmondsstormwateraddendum 2022 redlines.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
Packet Pg. 320
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.c
OCTOBER 2021
6.1.3 BMP-Specific Construction Techniques..........................................................25
6.2 Off -Site Analyses and Documentation............................................................................28
6.2.1 Category 1 Projects...........................................................................................28
6.2.2 Category 2 Projects...........................................................................................28
6.3 Design Requirements for Detention Vaults and Pipes....................................................30
6.3.1 Sizing & Design................................................................................................31
6.4 Underground Injection Controls......................................................................................31
7 Submittal Requirements..........................................................................................................33
7.1 Category 1 Stormwater Site Plans...................................................................................33
7.2 Category 2 Stormwater Site Plans...................................................................................33
APPENDICES
Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
Appendix B — Methods for Determining Design Infiltration Rates
Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure Elements
Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1. Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for Development.................................8
Figure 7.1. Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components........................................33
Figure 7.2. Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components........................................34
H TABLE OF CONTENTS zr edmondsstormwoteraddendum 2022 redlines.docx
Packet Pg. 321
8.1.c
1 INTRODUCTION
This Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (Addendum) provides direction for implementing the City of
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.30, Stormwater Management. The City of
Edmonds is required to regulate stormwater discharges to the municipal stormwater system and to waters
of the state, in compliance with the Western Washington Phase II National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit (the Permit). Under the Permit, the City must
establish and apply the minimum requirements specified in the Permit and provide design guidance for
stormwater quality and quantity control for development projects in Edmonds. Through ECDC
Chapter 18.30 and this Addendum, the City is complying with federal requirements under the Clean Water
Act and the Permit.
This Addendum is organized into 7 chapters, briefly summarized below:
• Chapter 2 — How to Use this Addendum includes information on how to use the Addendum in
conjunction with the ECDC and Ecology's 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW), and to clarify for users where the ECDC, SWMMWW, or Addendum
apply.
• Chapter 3 — Applicability of the Minimum Requirements includes details on the thresholds
that determine the applicability of the minimum requirements to different projects. This
information is based on SWMMWW Volume I, Section 3.3, but has been updated to reflect the
specific requirements of ECDC 18.30. Chapter 3 also includes a brief summary of how
ECDC 18.30.060 compares to the SWMMWW (regarding applicability of the minimum
requirements).
• Chapter 4 —Project Basin Locations and Applicable Requirements describes downstream
receiving waterbodies and/or drainage systems in the city, which will affect how the minimum
requirements apply to a given project (primarily Minimum Requirements No. 5, No. 6, and
No. 7). Chapter 4 also includes a brief discussion of the unique soil and topographical conditions
in the City of Edmonds.
• Chapter 5 —Project Minimum Requirements highlights the primary differences between the
minimum requirements presented in the SWMMWW and those in the ECDC and provides
additional details and guidance to help projects comply with each minimum requirement.
• Chapter 6 — Additional Requirements includes additional information on City -specific
requirements that are not fully described in the SWMMWW or ECDC. Specific topics include:
1. Additional requirements pertaining to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
(SWPPPs) Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management
Practices (BMPs)
2. Details on the off -site analyses and documentation required to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 4, Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
1. INTRODUCTION 1
Packet Pg. 322
8.1.c
3. Design requirements for detention vaults and pipes when used to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5
4. Information on Underground Injection Controls (UICs)
• Chapter 7 — Submittal Requirements summarizes the process and requirements for preparing
project submittals that meet the requirements of the SWMMWW, the ECDC, and this Addendum
The appendices included in this Addendum provide additional background information and requirements
related to stormwater management in the city. (Also note that there are several additional pertinent
appendices within the SWMMWW that are adopted by reference.) The following City -specific
appendices are included in this Addendum:
• Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
• Appendix B — Methods for Determining BMP Design Infiltration Rates
• Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure Elements
o Checklist 1 — Category 1 Stormwater Site Plans
o Checklist 2 — Category 2 Stormwater Site Plans
o Checklist 3 — Construction SWPPP Drawings and Report
o Checklist 4 — Methods for Determining Infiltration Rates
o Checklist 5 — Field and Design Procedures for Bioretention, Permeable Pavement, Rain
Gardens, and Downspout Infiltration Systems
o Checklist 6 — Procedures for Infiltration Trenches and Basins
• Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs
o Checklist 7 —
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth
o Checklist 8 —
Sheet Flow Dispersion
o Checklist 9 —
Concentrated Flow Dispersion
o Checklist 10
— Bioretention Cells, Swales, and Planter Boxes
o Checklist 11
— Permeable Paving
o Checklist 12
— Rain Gardens
o Checklist 13
— Downspout Infiltration
o Checklist 14
— Downspout Dispersion
o Checklist 15
— Perforated Stub -out Connections
2 1. INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 323
8.1.c
2 HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM
Review ECDC Chapter 18.30.030 and 18.30.040 to determine if the City's Stormwater Code and this
Addendum apply to your project. Review the definitions section of ECDC Chapter 18.30.10 (and if
necessary the Glossary in SWMMWW Volume I, Appendix G for clarification on terminology used in
ECDC Chapter 18.30 and this Addendum.
As per ECDC Chapter 18.30.60, the stormwater management requirements in the City of Edmonds —
including but not limited to thresholds, definitions, minimum requirements, adjustment and variance
criteria, and exceptions to these requirements — shall be governed by the 2019 SWMMWW, with
additional requirements and modifications as outlined in the provisions of ECDC Chapter 18.30 and this
Addendum. Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30 (18.30.060 in particular) and this Addendum to
identify how the City's requirements and the requirements of the SWMMWW apply to a given project. In
the event of inconsistencies between the various provisions, the more stringent provisions shall apply,
unless otherwise approved by the City. Where requirements in this Addendum are also covered in any
other law, ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation of any kind (i.e., outside of ECDC Chapter 18.30), the
more restrictive requirement shall govern, unless otherwise approved by the City.
This Addendum includes information to supplement or elaborate on the guidelines and requirements
outlined in ECDC Chapter 18.30 and the SWMMWW. To highlight for Addendum users where the
ECDC, SWMMWW, or Addendum apply, the following sections outline the general applicability of each
document, summarized according to the organization of the SWMMWW. Note however that the
SWMMWW is not always written in a manner that is suitable as a municipal regulatory tool, therefore
there are known overlaps among the ECDC, SWMMWW, and Addendum. As such, this section is only
intended to be a guide, not a definitive resource on SWMMWW applicability. When questions or
potential inconsistencies arise, project proponents should contact the City for clarification and
interpretation.
2.1 SWMMWW VOLUME I
• Chapter 1 — Introduction: Adopted in its entirety.
• Chapter 2 — Relationship of This Manual to Permits, Requirements, and Programs: Adopted in its
entirety.
• Chapter 3 — Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment: Users should
refer first to ECDC Chapter 18.30.60 and this Addendum. Note that some portions of
ECDC 18.30.60 refer back to the SWMMWW as well as specific sections of this Addendum.
o In addition, for all minimum requirements that require flow modeling, unless otherwise
specified, all continuous modeling shall be performed using the "Puget East 36" precipitation
time series, consisting of a 158-year precipitation and evaporation time series that are
representative of the climatic conditions in the City of Edmonds. This time series is available
in WWHM (select "Use WS-DOT data") and MGSFlood (Extended Timeseries menu).
2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM 3
Packet Pg. 324
8.1.c
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 includes an additional "retro-fit" specific to Minimum Requirement
#5; see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i.
• Chapter 4 — UIC Program: Adopted in its entirety. All UICs within Edmonds shall comply with
the applicable requirements of this section.
• Appendices —Use Appendix G for the SWMMWW only and refer to ECDC Chapter 18.30.10 for
ECDC definitions.
2.2 SWMMWW VOLUME II
• SWMMWW Volume II is adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, this Addendum includes supplemental information to support compliance with
SWMMWW Minimum Requirement No. 2, Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact
Development BMPs. See Chapter 6.
2.3 SWMMWW VOLUME III
• Chapter 1 — Choosing your BMPs: Chapter adopted in its entirety.
o The infeasibility criteria typically are included within the specific BMP descriptions in the
SWMMWW, but are summarized in Appendix A for clarity and ease of use. Appendix A also
includes additional BMP infeasibility criteria that are specific to the City of Edmonds, and
not necessarily included in the 2014 SWMMWW.
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 adds detention to the list of BMPs to be considered under minimum
requirement #5; see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.
• Chapter 2 — Modelling Your BMPs: Chapter adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, Checklist 8 thru 15 of this Addendum include checklists for designing BMPs.
• Chapter 3 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans: Refer first to Chapter 7 of this Addendum, and
associated Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3. The requirements of SWMMWW Volume III,
Chapter 3 apply to projects in Edmonds, but Chapter 7 of this Addendum has been created to
facilitate compliance with both the SWMMWW requirements for preparation of Stormwater Site
Plans, as well as additional City -specific submittal requirements.
2.4 SWMMWW VOLUME IV
• SWMMWW Volume IV is adopted in its entirety.
4 2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM
Packet Pg. 325
8.1.c
2.5 SWMMWW VOLUME V
• SWMMWW Volume V is adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, this Addendum includes supplemental information to support determination of
On -Site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility. Specifically, Appendix A of this
Addendum summarizes infeasibility criteria that apply to each BMP (to be used in complying
with Minimum Requirement No. 5). The infeasibility criteria typically are included within the
specific BMP descriptions in the SWMMWW, but are summarized in Appendix A for clarity
and ease of use. Appendix A also includes additional BMP infeasibility criteria that are
specific to the City of Edmonds, and not necessarily included in the 2019 SWMMWW.
Where there are differences between the SWMMWW and Appendix A, the requirements in
Appendix A shall apply unless otherwise approved by the City.
o In addition, this Addendum includes design requirements for detention tanks and vaults to
meet the Edmonds -specific application of a detention as a BMP for Minimum Requirement
#5 in Section 6.3.
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 includes a "retrofit" provision under Minimum Requirement #5
which requires mitigating a portion of existing unmitigated hard surfaces to remain on a
project site; see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i
2.6 ADDENDUM CONTENT NOT COVERED IN THE
SWMMWW T
Note that in addition to the items included in Sections 2.1 through 2.5 above, this Addendum
includes extensive information that is unique to the City and not tied to a specific SWMMWW
volume or issue. Therefore, in addition to the notes above, users must review all of this
Addendum and ECDC 18.30 for applicable requirements. This includes the Appendices and
checklists included in this Addendum (particularly the BMP design checklists), which contain
City -specific design, procedural, and submittal requirements that may not be reflected in the
SWMMWW or ECDC.
• In addition, as noted in Section 2.1 above, unless otherwise specified, all continuous modeling
shall be performed using the "Puget East 36" precipitation time series, consisting of a 158-year
precipitation and evaporation time series that are representative of the climatic conditions in the
City of Edmonds. This time series is available in WWHM (select "Use WS-DOT data") and
MGSFlood (Extended Timeseries menu).
• The use of corrugated metal pipe within Edmonds is prohibit on both private and public
properties storm drain conveyance and /or BMPs (i.e. detention tanks).
2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM 5
Packet Pg. 326
8.1.c
U
Q
Packet Pg. 327
8.1.c
3 APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS
This chapter is based on SWMMWW Volume I, Section 2.4, however the content below has been
updated to reflect the specific requirements of ECDC 18.30. Project proponents must review
ECDC 18.30 in detail. The following provides additional information and direction on the thresholds and
applicability of minimum requirements outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.
Project proponents must be aware that not all of the minimum requirements apply to every development
project. The applicability varies depending on the project type and size. This chapter summarizes
thresholds that determine the applicability of the minimum requirements to different projects. Review
ECDC 18.30.060 and use the flow chart in Figure 3.1 to determine which of the minimum requirements
apply to your project. (The minimum requirements themselves are provided in 18.30.060.D and are
summarized in Chapter 5 of this Addendum).
The thresholds described below and in Figure 3.1 are to be determined at the time of application for a
subdivision, plat, short plat, building permit, or other construction permit. For projects involving only
land disturbing activities, (e.g., clearing or grading), the thresholds apply at the time of application for the
permit allowing or authorizing that activity.
3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 7
Packet Pg. 328
8.1.c
Does the project result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area?
OR
Does the land disturbing activity total 7,000 square feet or greater?
Yes
No
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through 5 apply I Minimum Requirement No. 2 applies
Next Question
IF
Does the project add 5,000 square feet or more of new plus replaced hard surfaces?
OR
Convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas?
OR
Convert 2.5 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture?
No
Yes No
Is this a road related project?
All Minimum Requirements
apply to the new and replaced Yes
hard surfaces and converted
vegetation areas.
All Minimum Requirements
apply to the new hard surfaces
and converted vegetation areas.
Yes
Does the project add
5,000 square feet or No
more of new hard
surfaces?
Yes
Do new hard surfaces add 50% or
more to the existing hard surfaces
within the project limits?
No
Figure 3.1. Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for Development.
No additional
requirements.
8 3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 329
8.1.c
3.1 THRESHOLDS AND APPLICABILITY
All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
The following Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5:
• Results in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
• Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
The following Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9:
• Results in 5,000 square feet or more of new plus replaced hard surfaces, or
• Converts 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
• Converts 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
3.1.1 Additional Requirements for Road -Related Projects
For road -related projects, runoff from the new hard surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and
sidewalks) and the converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum requirements if the new hard
surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more. In addition, if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or
more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits, runoff from the
new and replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum
requirements. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the width of the right-of-
way.
3.1.2 New Connections to the City's MS4
When a property owner proposes a new connection to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
(MS4), and the situation either 1) does not exceed the Category 1 or Category 2 thresholds above, or
2) does not involve activity that meets the definition of development, the following applies:
• Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but wish to connect directly or indirectly
to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval.
• For sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of hard surface area to the
City's MS4, the project shall comply with the requirements of this chapter, treating all hard
surfaces to be drained to the City system as new hard surfaces, unless applicant can demonstrate
that the site will discharge in the same manner and quantities prior to the proposed project.
Applicant shall account for natural dispersion and/or infiltration which may be occurring if these
new hard surfaces area currently drain through pervious areas in their analysis.
3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 9
Packet Pg. 330
8.1.c
3.1.3 Comparisons to the SWMMWW
Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30 in detail, but the following notes are provided to help
clarify how ECDC 18.30.060 compares to the SWMMWW regarding applicability of the minimum
requirements (see Chapter 5 for additional details on the individual minimum requirements and how they
differ from the SWMMWW):
1. ECDC 18.30 refers to "Category 1" projects and "Category 2" projects. See ECDC 18.30.060 for
complete details, but in general:
O Category 1 project sites result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard
surface area and shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
O Category 2 project sites result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard
surface area and shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
2. ECDC 18.30 does not differentiate between new development and redevelopment.
3. Information regarding which surfaces each minimum requirement applies to (e.g., new hard
surfaces, replaced hard surfaces, or both) is typically discussed under each minimum requirement
as opposed to within the initial applicability section.
4. In addition to item No. 3 above, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b includes a retrofit requirement for
projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain existing hard
surfaces that do not drain to an approved stormwater management facility. These projects are
required to provide On -site Stormwater Management BMPs to manage a portion (a minimum of
25 percent) of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after project completion. See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.b for complete details on this requirement.
5. ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 also adds detention as a BMP to be considered for feasibility under
Minimum Requirement #5 in additional to those in SWMMWW, see Section 6.3.
6. As per the SWMMWW, for road -related projects, if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet
or more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits, runoff
from the new and replaced hard surfaces shall meet all the minimum requirements. Otherwise, the
minimum requirements only apply to the new hard surfaces (if the new hard surfaces total
5,000 square feet or more). Unlike the SWMMWW, non -road -related projects do not have to
assess the valuation of the proposed improvements in order to determine the applicability of the
minimum requirements. In general, once triggered by the applicable project area thresholds (see
below and ECDC 18.30.060), the minimum requirements apply to both new and replaced hard
surfaces.
7. ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum also includes requirements for new connections to the City's
MS4, when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the definition of
development. See the previous section of this Addendum for additional information on new
connections.
8. ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum modify the flow modelling basin to be used in modelling, see
Section 2.6.
9. ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum requires use of the phosphorus treatment menu within the Hall's
Creek and Lake Ballinger basins; see Section 5.6.
10. Section 5.3, below, prohibits the use of corrugated metal piping (CMP) within Edmonds.
10 3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 331
8.1.c
4 PROJECT BASIN LOCATION AND
APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
4.1 DETERMINING DOWNSTREAM RECEIVING SYSTEM(S)
Broadly speaking, stormwater runoff in the City of Edmonds either travels west to Puget Sound (via a
creek or piped system) or to the east to Lake Ballinger or Hall Creek, which discharges to Lake Ballinger.
In addition to assessing the new and replaced hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas associated
with a project, the minimum requirements (primarily Minimum Requirements No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7)
can also vary depending on the project's downstream receiving waterbody and/or drainage system. The
specific details of each minimum requirement are outlined in Chapter 5, but in general, projects should
determine what type of system(s) their project site drains to early in the development process: The two
primary systems to be aware of are described below. Note that these systems are not mutually exclusive:
1. Direct Discharge areas: Those site areas that discharge runoff directly to Puget Sound via a
constructed conveyance system (e.g., pipe or ditch) without first entering a creek or other
receiving water. (See Section 3.4.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW for the full list of restrictions
that must be met to qualify as a direct discharge.)
2. City of Edmonds Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4): Those site areas that discharge
to the City's MS4 before ultimately discharging to a downstream receiving water (e.g., a creek,
lake, or Puget Sound). See the City's NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit for the complete
MS4 definition, but this generally includes sites that discharge to a dedicated stormwater
conveyance system (including roads with drainage systems, ditches, manmade channels, or storm
drains) owned or operated by the City and that discharge to waters of Washington State
(including creeks, lakes, ponds, wetlands, and Puget Sound).
A map of watersheds in Edmonds is available via the Edmonds GIS Map that can be accessed on the
City's website here: (<www.maps.edmondswa.gov>). Direct Discharge Basins are those labeled "Puget
Sound" or "Puget Sound Piped." Edmonds Way is known to have an overflow under certain conditions
which creates a discharge to Edmonds Marsh (not considered man-made drainage course for the purposes
of this exemption), and therefore the Edmonds Way basin shall not be considered a direct discharge basin.
An applicant with site -specific information that is contrary to the basin designations shown in Figure B-1
can present this information to the Public Works Director (Director) or designee for a possible change in
basin designation. The Director or designee will make a determination on any requests for a site -specific
change in basin designation.
4.2 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Edmonds is fortunate to be located adjacent to Puget Sound and possess topography that facilitates
desirable views. The underlying soils and relatively steep slopes, however, complicate the application of
stormwater management techniques.
4. PROJECT BASIN TYPE AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS 11
Packet Pg. 332
8.1.c
Prior to logging and subsequent development of the Edmonds area, trees and the forest duff layer above
the soil surface (consisting primarily of needles, leaves, branches, bark, and stems in various stages of
decomposition) covered the city. With logging came the elimination of the majority of the tree canopy
and the duff layer, and with it the elimination of the water -holding capacity of the natural land cover. hi
the majority of the city, the soils that remain (after forest removal and subsequent development) consist of
till or hard pan, which is much less effective at storing or absorbing rainwater. Although this Addendum
and the SWMMWW place substantial emphasis on the use of infiltration and on -site stormwater
management techniques, the soil regime in the City of Edmonds can make this goal challenging. It is
therefore important that project sites thoroughly investigate and understand their soil conditions (as well
as other site conditions such as slope, groundwater levels, etc.) before proceeding too far with the site
stormwater design. See the submittal checklists in Appendix C (Checklists 1 through 3), BMP
infeasibility criteria in Appendix A, and SWMMWW for additional details and requirements.
In addition to challenging soil conditions, approximately 25 percent of the land area in the City of
Edmonds has a slope of 15 percent or greater or is in an Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (the
Meadowdale area in the northernmost portion of the city). Geologic hazards in these areas can be
increased when stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces percolates into the soil. As emphasized in the
submittal checklists in Appendix C (Checklists 1 through 3), BMP infeasibility criteria in Appendix A,
and SWMMWW Chapter 3; consideration of slopes in the project vicinity is a critical component of the
site stormwater design.
161
12 4. PROJECT BASIN TYPE AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 333
8.1.c
5 PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
This chapter should be used as a supplement to ECDC 18.30.060.D and SWMMWW Volume I, Chapter
3 as it emphasizes the key differences between the minimum requirements outlined in the SWMMWW
and those outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D. Project proponents must still review ECDC 18.30.060.D in
detail, but the following text provides additional information and direction on the minimum requirements
outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D. As noted previously in Chapter 4, once a given minimum requirement is
triggered (per the thresholds in Chapter 3), the specifics of the minimum requirement may vary depending
on the project downstream receiving waterbody and/or drainage system.
5.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 1 - PREPARATION OF
STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans are required for all projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 1, as outlined in
Chapter 3 and ECDC 18.30.060.C. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 3
of Volume III of the SWMMWW. However, because Chapter 3 of the SWMMWW includes extensive
technical requirements, but does not explicitly specify how those requirements shall be consistently
documented, submitted, and/or reviewed for a typical development project, the City of Edmonds has
developed project checklists to facilitate compliance with this minimum requirement (and thus project
submittal and review). Those checklists are introduced in Chapter 7 and provided in Appendix C,
Checklists 1 through 3.
5.2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 2 - CONSTRUCTION
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.2. In addition, note that ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d.i points to the SWMMWW
Chapter 3, Section 3.4.2 for details on the requirements for Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plans (SWPPPs), including the 13 Elements that must be reflected in the Construction SWPPP. See
Chapter 6 for additional requirements pertaining to Construction SWPPP Element No. 13 — Protect Low
Impact Development BMPs, which are not provided in the SWMMWW.
5.3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 3 - SOURCE CONTROL
OF POLLUTION
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.3 and SWMMWW Volume IV. Note that all single-family residential projects
shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs from SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for
Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 13
Packet Pg. 334
8.1.c
Corrugated metal pipe (CMP) has been found to be a routine failure problem in Edmonds and a potential
source of additional sediment in the City system. For this reason, CMP pipe is not permitted within
Edmonds on either public or private property or both conveyance storm pipe and for detention tanks.
5.4 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 4 - PRESERVATION OF
NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.4 and the content presented below. Although this minimum requirement is based
on Minimum Requirement No. 4 in SWMMWW Volume I, Section 3.4.4, there are enough differences
between the City's requirements and those in the SWMMWW that project proponents should not refer to
the SWMMWW for Minimum Requirement No. 4. Only ECDC 18.30.060.D.3 and the following shall be
required. To demonstrate compliance with this minimum requirement, all projects shall submit as part of
their Stormwater Site Plan an off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges. (See the end of this section, and Chapter 6, for details on the requirements for analysis and
documentation.)
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the
natural location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the
project site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters or down gradient
properties. The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the
ultimate outfall location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require
energy dissipation. (Designs for outfall systems to protect against adverse impacts from concentrated
runoff are included in SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 1.)
In addition, existing upstream flows must be accommodated without causing erosion or flooding impacts.
Upstream drainage means drainage from adjacent property that enters the proposed project site (other than
a defined natural channel). Upstream flows shall not be routed through the project's conveyance,
treatment, or retention/detention systems, unless those systems are sized to control those flows. Upstream
flows that are collected and routed through or around the site in a separate conveyance shall be dispersed
at the downgradient property line, if feasible, or discharged at a project outfall (or outfalls) in a manner
that does not violate the criteria below or cause the capacity of a conveyance system to be exceeded.
Where no conveyance system exists at the adjacent downgradient property line and the discharge was
previously unconcentrated flow or significantly lower concentrated flow, measures must be taken to
prevent downgradient impacts. Drainage easements from downstream property owners may be needed
and should be obtained prior to approval of engineering plans.
For Category 2 projects only — where no conveyance system exists at the adjacent downstream property
line and the natural (existing) discharge is unconcentrated, any runoff concentrated by the proposed
project, including upstream drainage, must be discharged as follows:
1. If the 100-year peak discharge is less than or equal to 0.2 cfs (0.3 cfs using 15-minute time steps)
under existing conditions and will remain less than or equal to 0.2 cfs under developed
conditions, then the concentrated runoff may be discharged onto a rock pad or to any other
system that serves to disperse flows.
2. If the 100-year peak discharge is between 0.2 and 0.5 cfs (or 0.75 cfs using 15-minute time steps)
under existing conditions and will remain in that range under developed conditions, then the
14 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 335
8.1.c
concentrated runoff may be discharged through a dispersal trench or other dispersal system,
provided the applicant can demonstrate that there will be no significant adverse impact to
downhill properties or drainage systems.
3. If the 100-year peak discharge is greater than 0.5 cfs for either existing or developed conditions,
or if a significant adverse impact to downgradient properties or drainage systems is likely, then a
conveyance system shall be provided to convey the concentrated runoff across the downstream
properties to an acceptable discharge point (i.e., an enclosed drainage system or open drainage
feature where concentrated runoff can be discharged without significant adverse impact).
To demonstrate compliance with this minimum requirement, all projects shall submit as part of their
Stormwater Site Plan an off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges. Off -site analyses shall assess upstream and downstream conditions, including the conveyance
capacity and erosion potential in the downstream system. If a problem is found, mitigation is required to
prevent worsening of that problem or to mitigate an existing flooding or erosion problem. The off -site
analysis shall include, at a minimum, a qualitative analysis of each upstream drainage system entering a
site, and each downstream drainage system leaving a site. A quantitative analysis may be required for any
project deemed to need additional downstream information or where the project proponent or the City
determines that a quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the
conveyance system (e.g., where there is evidence of a risk to downstream systems such as erosion,
flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other related impacts). See
Chapter 6 for additional details on off -site analyses and documentation.
5.5 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 5 - ON -SITE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
The City has made several additions and changes to the contents of Minimum Requirement No. 5 relative
to the SWMMWW. Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 in detail to ensure all City -
specific requirements are addressed. This section of the Addendum provides a summary of the City -
specific elements of Minimum Requirement No. 5.
In addition, this Addendum includes several tools to support implementation of Minimum Requirement
No. 5 and related requirements. These tools include:
A summary of infeasibility criteria for all On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs (see
Appendix A). These infeasibility criteria must be considered when evaluating the feasibility of
On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs as part of List No. 1 or List No. 2. The infeasibility
criteria are included within the specific BMP descriptions in the SWMMWW, but are
summarized in Appendix A for clarity. Appendix A also includes additional BMP infeasibility
criteria that are specific to the City of Edmonds, and not necessarily included in the 2019
SWMMWW.
2. A summary of acceptable methods for determining BMP design infiltration rates (see
Appendix B; and Appendix C, Checklist 4). Initial site infiltration rates may be determined either
using field testing procedures, or the Soil Grain Size Analysis Method. These methods are
described in detail in Appendix B.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 15
Packet Pg. 336
8.1.c
A summary of site investigation and field and design procedures required for several of the On -
Site Stormwater Management BMPs as well as for infiltration basins and trenches (see
Appendix C, Checklists 5 and 6). The field and design procedures required to design and
implement On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs can be considerable, and include issues such
as determining infiltration rates, determining depth to groundwater or other impermeable layers,
soils reporting requirements, etc.
4. Submittal checklists for Category 1 and Category 2 projects, including notes on project site, soil,
and BMP design information that must be documented and submitted to the City to meet the City
of Edmonds and SWMMWW requirements related to Minimum Requirement No. 5 (and other
minimum requirements. See Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3.
5. Design checklists for most of the On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs in List No. 1 and List
No. 2 (see Appendix D).
The applicability of Minimum Requirement No. 5 depends on the project type, project location, and the
existing and proposed surfaces at the project site. See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 for details, but in summary:
Projects that drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain existing hard surfaces
that do not drain to an approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -Site
Stormwater Management BMPs to manage a minimum of 25 percent of those existing hard
surfaces that will remain after the project. The intent is to bring a portion of any existing,
unmanaged surfaces up to current standards. If the 25 percent minimum is met, projects are not
required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for these existing surfaces
(as per the subsequent project scenarios).
2. Similar to the SWMMWW, Category 1 project sites (project sites subject to Minimum
Requirements No. 1 through No. 5) that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 shall
either use On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No. 1 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d)
for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed, or demonstrate compliance with the
LID Performance Standard (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.c). Note that in the City of Edmonds, List
No. 1 includes detention vaults or pipes as the final BMP option for roofs and other hard surfaces.
See Chapter 6 for associated design requirements for detention vaults and pipes, including
simplified sizing methods for meeting Minimum Requirement No. 5. (Note also that if the project
is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 7 (per
ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault or pipe is not required to be installed to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5.)
Categor,2project sites (project sites subject to Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9) are
subject to similar requirements as Category 1 projects, but must use List No. 2 instead of List
No. 1 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e).
4. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the City's MS4 (in accordance with the
restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound presented in Section 2.5.7 of Volume I
of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID Performance Standard, and only have to
evaluate a subset of the BMPs in List No. 1 or List No. 2.
5. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to either:
o Discharge to the downstream private property (with approval)
16 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 337
8.1.c
o Discharge runoff to an on -site system from List No. 1 (see in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d).
■ Sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their buffers are not
required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility. However, a
geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical engineer is required.
■ For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their buffers,
projects must meet applicable Category 1 or Category 2 project requirements for
Minimum Requirement No. 5 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii).
o Project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's MS4, with prior approval; in such cases,
projects shall meet all provisions of ECDC 18.30 as they would drain to the MS4 in post
project conditions.
6. Finally, the following guidance shall be used to help clarify the requirements in the SWMMWW
specific to List No. 1 and No. 2. Where the SWMMWW and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d/e states that
"for each surface, consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first
BMP that is considered feasible. No other On -Site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary
for that surface" the following clarifications are provided:
o The goal of List No. 1 and List No. 2 is to manage 100 percent of each surface. If a project
cannot manage 100 percent of a given surface with the first feasible BMP, a second BMP
may be required to manage the remaining unmanaged area (depending on the size of the
unmanaged area and the site -specific constraints). For example, where a roof surface drains to
multiple downspouts around the perimeter of the structure, it is generally insufficient to only
manage runoff that drains to a single downspout and to leave the remaining downspouts
unmanaged (i.e., due to infeasibility considerations).
7. For BMPs without specific sizing criteria in this Addendum, single family residential projects
under 2,000 SF of new plus replaced hard surfaces only, may use the simplified sizing per the
included checklist for each BMP or per Volume V of SWMMWW to satisfy Minimum
Requirement #5. However, such sizing methodology shall be assumed to generate an overflow
and a piped or subsurface overflow connection is required for such BMPs unless otherwise
waived by the City.
5.6 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 6 - RUNOFF
TREATMENT
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.6 for thresholds and core requirements. See the SWMMWW for additional
information on complying with this minimum requirement. In particular, the following sections should be
reviewed:
• Volume I, Section 3.4.6 for details on treatment facility sizing
• Volume I, Chapter 4 and Volume V, Chapters 2 and 3 for general BMP selection. Note also that
phosphorus treatment is required for projects that drain to Hall Creek or Lake Ballinger.
• Volume V for design and maintenance requirements.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 17
Packet Pg. 338
8.1.c
5.6.1 Edmonds -Specific Oil and Floatables Control
In addition to the oil control requirements in the SWMMWW, all projects in the City of Edmonds not
zoned as single-family residential that collect runoff from five or more parking spaces shall install
floatable controls in catch basins (if another approved floatable control system is not employed).
5.7 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 7 — FLOW CONTROL
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.7 for thresholds and core requirements. See the SWMMWW for additional
information on complying with this minimum requirement (in particular, Volume I, Section 3.4.7).
Note that flow control in accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that
discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (other minimum requirements
still apply, including Minimum Requirement No. 6, as well as Minimum Requirement No. 5 and the
Edmonds Way direct discharge requirements). See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 3.4.7 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
In addition, the following information may be useful in determining the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 7, specifically per the 100-year flow frequency threshold outlined in
ECDC 18.30.060.D.7.b.iii:
Calculations to determine whether a project exceeds the 0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs), using a 1-hour
time step (or 0.15 cfs using a 15-minute time step) increase in the 100-year recurrence interval flow must
be performed individually for each project using an approved continuous simulation runoff model. The
calculation will compare runoff in the post development site to the pre -development land cover. Pre -
development, for this activity only, is the lower runoff of the pre project condition, or the site on July 6,
1977 (the effective date of the City's first drainage control ordinance). The unique site, soil, precipitation,
and other project -specific factors will ultimately determine whether this threshold is exceeded.
Nonetheless, the following general guidelines (based on hypothetical site designs) may be used to help
identify the likelihood of this threshold being exceeded. The following land use changes are likely to
exceed this threshold under certain conditions:
• Converting approximately 5,000 square feet of forest to hard surface
• Converting approximately 5,000 square feet of pasture to hard surface
• Converting approximately 0.25 acres of forest to landscape surface
• Converting approximately 1.25 acres of forest to pasture surfaces (in till soil conditions)
5.8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. H — WETLAND
PROTECTION
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.8 and SWMMWW Volume I, Section 3.4.8. See also SWMMWW
Volume I, Appendix I-C.
18 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 339
8.1.c
5.9 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 9 - OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.9. See also the submittal checklists provided in Appendix C, Checklists 1 through
3 (also referenced previously as part of Minimum Requirements No. 1 and No. 5) for notes about
submittal requirements related to the required operation and maintenance manual.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 19
Packet Pg. 340
8.1.c
U
Q
Packet Pg. 341
8.1.c
6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
This chapter includes additional requirements that are either not included in the SWMMWW, or that are
supplemental to the information provided in the SWMMWW. Specifically, this chapter addresses:
1. Additional requirements pertaining to Construction SWPPP Element No. 13 — Protect Low
Impact Development BMPs (required in the SWMMWW.
2. Details on the off -site analyses and documentation required to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 4, Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls (City of Edmonds
specific).
3. Design requirements for detention vaults and pipes when used to meet Minimum Requirement
No. 5.
4. Information on Underground Injection Controls (UICs).
6.1 PROTECTION OF LID FACILITIES DURING
CONSTRUCTION
To ensure that LID stormwater facilities and BMPs will be fully functional after construction, it is
important to protect these BMPs during construction activities. Protecting native soil and vegetation,
minimizing soil compaction, and retaining the hydrologic function of LID BMPs during the site
preparation and construction phases are some of the most important practices during the development
process.
The purpose of this section is to provide designers, builders, and inspectors with guidance and tools for
meeting Minimum Requirement No. 2, Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact Development BMPs. This
section does not provide guidance on construction or design of LID BMPs (see SWMMWW Volume III
and Volume V), or cover all Construction SWPPP practices (see SWMMWW Volume II), but rather
focuses on how to most efficiently reduce impacts on LID BMPs specifically during construction. The
practices specified in this section must be applied to protect LID BMPs, unless the given practice
does not apply to the project site conditions or activities.
6.1.1 General Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs
Applicable to LID
Overall Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirements are specified in
Chapter 5, Minimum Requirement No. 2 and SWMMWW Volume II. In general, Construction SWPPP
BMPs limit the impact of site disturbance, erosion, and sediment deposition during construction. Some
Construction SWPPP BMPs focus on providing a physical barrier or deterrent to help minimize
construction -related site disturbance and/or erosion, while other Construction SWPPP BMPs help protect
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 21
Packet Pg. 342
8.1.c
the site from concentrated (i.e., erosive) flows. General Construction SWPPP BMPs and their application
for protection of LID BMPs in particular are summarized below. These BMPs must be considered for
projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2 that are proposing to construct LID BMPs.
Construction SWPPP BMP
Application
BMP C103: High Visibility Fence
Use fencing to limit clearing; prevent disturbance of sensitive areas, their
buffers, and other areas; limit construction traffic; and protect areas
where marking with flagging may not provide adequate protection
BMP C200: Interceptor Dike and Swale
Use an interceptor dike and/or swale to intercept the runoff from
unprotected areas and direct it to areas where erosion can be controlled
BMP C201: Grass -Lined Channels
Use grass lined channels where concentrated runoff may cause erosion
and flooding of the site
BMP C207: Check Dams
Use check dams in swales or ditches to reduce the velocity and dissipate
concentrated flow
BMP C208: Triangular Silt Dike (TSD)
Use triangular silt dikes as check dams, for perimeter protection,
(Geotextile-Encased Check Dam)
temporary soil stockpile protection, drop inlet protection, or as a
temporary interceptor dike
BMP C231: Brush Barrier
Use brush barriers to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
coarse sediment from overland flow
BMP C233: Silt Fence
Use silt fences to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
sediment from overland flow
BMP C234: Vegetated Strip
Use vegetated strips to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
sediment from overland flow
6.1.2 Additional Construction Techniques for LID BMPs
In addition to the general Construction SWPPP BMPs presented in Section 6.1.1, this section outlines
specific construction -phase techniques to protect LID BMPs. LID BMP protection is still a somewhat
new and evolving practice, therefore the specific LID BMP protection measures outlined below are not
explicitly called out in the SWMMWW. Rather, the techniques presented in this section supplement the
Construction SWPPP BMPs presented above, and those presented in the SWMMWW Volume II. (Note
these techniques can be applied to any site, not just those incorporating LID, but these techniques are
particularly important for LID BMP protection.)
Construction Site Planning and Sequencing
Construction site planning and sequencing is a procedural BMP that is critical to successful installation
and long-term operation of LID BMPs. Proper site planning and construction sequencing will minimize
the impact of construction on permanent stormwater facilities by reducing the potential for soil erosion
and compaction. Site planning and sequencing techniques to be used as practicable for protection of LID
BMPs include:
22 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 343
8.1.c
Construction Site Planning and
Sequencing Requirements
Construction Site Planning and Sequencing Techniques
Limit clearing and grading activities
• Keep grading to a minimum by incorporating natural
topographic depressions into the development.
• Shape final lot grades and topographic features early (i.e., at
the site development stage) where feasible.
• Limit the amount of cut and fill in areas with permeable soils.
• Limit clearing to road, utility, building pad, lawn areas, and the
minimum amount of extra land necessary to maneuver
machinery (e.g., a 10-foot perimeter around a building).
Limit construction activity in areas
• Clearly document —and plan to meet and walk through the
designated for LID
site with equipment operators prior to construction —to clarify
construction boundaries, limits of disturbance, and
construction activities in the vicinity of LID BMPs.
• General/primary contractor must inform other sub -contractors
of applicable LID BMP protection requirements. This is
particularly important when working around permeable
pavement.
Limit clearing and grading during heavy
• Time construction activities to start during the summer (lowest
rainfall seasons
precipitation) and end in the fall (when conditions are
favorable for the establishment of vegetation), if feasible.
Minimize the amount and time that graded
• Complete construction and erosion control activities in one
areas are left exposed
section of the site before beginning activity in another section.
Utilize permeable and nutrient rich soils
• Preserve any portion of the site with permeable soils to
promote infiltration of stormwater runoff.
• Leave areas of rich topsoil in place, or if excavated, utilize
elsewhere on the site to amend areas with sparse or nutrient
deficient topsoil.
Reduce impact of construction access roads
• Reduce the number and size (width/length) of construction
access roads.
• Locate construction access roads in areas where future roads
and utility corridors will be placed (unless utilizing permeable
pavement).
Promote sheet flow and minimize
• Avoid grading that results in steep, continuous slopes,
concentrated runoff
especially in areas contributing runoff to LID BMPs.
LID BMP activation
• LID BMPs shall not begin operation until all erosion -causing
project improvements (including use of access roads that may
contribute sediment) are completed and all exposed ground
surfaces are stabilized by revegetation or landscaping in
upland areas potentially contributing runoff to the BMP.
0
CM
00
r
U
U
w
m
0
0
L
0
a�
c
0
m
2
U
d
c
m
U
E
c
m
a
L
3
E
`0
..,
U
c
0
E
w
a�
N
a�
U
Q
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 23
Packet Pg. 344
8.1.c
Activities During Construction
Many common construction -phase activities pose a risk to LID BMPs. The following techniques will help
minimize these impacts. Techniques to be used for protection of LID BMPs include:
Erosion Control Requirements
Erosion Control Techniques
Protect native topsoil during the
• Where practicable, protect areas of rich topsoil. If excavation is
construction phase, and reuse on site
necessary, stockpile native soils that can be used on the site
after construction.
• Stockpile materials in areas designated for clearing and
grading (such as parking areas and future impervious
roadways) and away from infiltration and other stormwater
facilities.
• Cover small stockpiles with weed barrier material that sheds
moisture yet allows air transmission. Large stockpiles may
need to be seeded and/or mulched.
• Do not relocate topsoil or other material to areas where they
can cover critical root zones, suffocate vegetation, or erode
into adjacent streams.
Use effective revegetation methods
• Use native plant species adapted to the local environment.
• Plant during late fall, winter, or early spring months when
vegetation is likely to establish quickly and survive.
• Utilize proper seedbed preparation.
Fertilize and mulch to protect germinating plants. Apply 1 inch
of compost topped with 2 inches of mulch.
• Protect areas designated for revegetation from soil
compaction by restricting heavy equipment.
• Provide proper soil amendments where necessary (refer to
SWMMWW, Volume V, Chapter 5, BMP T5.13 Post -
Construction Soil Quality and Depth).
Amend soil toward the end of construction. Once established,
protect from compaction and erosion.
• During storage, plants should be protected by solar screens
when possible to prevent overexposure and excessive drying.
Perform preconstruction, routine, and
• Conduct a preconstruction inspection to verify that adequate
postconstruction inspections
barriers have been placed around vegetation retention areas,
infiltration facilities (as needed), and structural controls are
implemented properly.
• Conduct routine inspections to verify that structural controls
are being maintained and effectively protecting LID BMPs
throughout construction.
• Conduct a final inspection to verify that revegetation areas are
stabilized and that permanent LID BMPs are in place and
functioning ro erl .
24 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 345
8.1.c
6.1.3 BMP-Specific Construction Techniques
This section outlines construction -phase BMP protection techniques specific to categories of LID BMPs
(e.g., infiltration and dispersion) as well as specific LID BMPs (permeable pavement, bioretention
areas/rain gardens, and vegetated roofs). The BMP protection techniques presented previously in
Section 6.1.2 are applicable to the overall construction site to help protect LID BMPs. The techniques
outlined in this section are based on the specific BMP functions, targeting typical construction activities
that pose a risk to individual BMPs.
Infiltration and Dispersion Facility Construction Techniques
It is critical that appropriate methods are used to protect infiltration and dispersion BMPs from
compaction and sediment loading during construction. For infiltration facilities in particular, the subgrade
soils must be protected from clogging and over -compaction to maintain the soil permeability and ensure
BMP performance. Techniques for protection of infiltration and dispersion BMPs during various stages of
construction are summarized below.
Construction Stage
Techniques for Protecting Infiltration and Dispersion Facilities
Prior to construction
• The infiltration/dispersion area shall be clearly identified (e.g., using flagging
or high visibility fencing) and protected prior to construction to prevent
compaction of underlying soils by vehicle traffic.
• Develop a soil and vegetation management plan showing areas to be
protected and restoration methods for disturbed areas before land clearing
sta rts.
• The Construction SWPPP sheets must outline construction sequencing that will
protect the infiltration/dispersion area during construction.
• Construction SWPPP BMPs and protection techniques identified in the
previous sections shall be implemented as applicable. In particular, be sure to
stabilize upslope construction areas (e.g., using silt fences, berms, mulch, or
other Construction SWPPP BMPs) and minimize overland flow distances.
Excavation
• Excavation of infiltration/dispersion areas shall be performed by machinery
operating adjacent to the BMP. No heavy equipment with narrow tracks,
narrow tires, or large lugged high pressure tires shall be allowed on the
infiltration/dispersion area footprint.
• Where feasible, excavate infiltration/dispersion areas to final grade only after
all disturbed areas in the upgradient project drainage area have been
permanently stabilized. (If infiltration areas must be excavated before
permanent site stabilization, initial excavation must be conducted to no less
than 6 inches of the final elevation of the facility floor.)
• Excavation of infiltration areas shall not be allowed during wet or saturated
conditions.
• The use of draglines and trackhoes should be considered for constructing
infiltration and dispersion areas.
• The bottom (and sidewalls if feasible) of an infiltration facility excavation must
be raked or scarified to a minimum depth of 3 inches after final excavation to
restore infiltration rates.
• Scarify soil along the dispersion flow path if disturbed during construction.
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 25
Packet Pg. 346
8.1.c
Construction Stage
Techniques for Protecting Infiltration and Dispersion Facilities
Sediment control
. Bioretention, rain garden, and permeable pavement BMPs shall not be used as
sediment control facilities, and all drainage shall be directed away from the
BMP location after initial rough grading.
Direct construction site flow away from the infiltration/dispersion area using
applicable Construction SWPPP BMPs (e.g., temporary diversion swales).
Permeable Pavement
There are many potential applications and site scenarios where permeable pavement can be applied. The
following techniques highlight the most broadly applicable techniques to be used to protect permeable
pavement BMPs during construction. Refer to the previous section for construction protection methods
that are applicable to all infiltration BMPs, as well as Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 for general site protection
measures. In addition to those techniques, the following techniques apply specifically for protection of
permeable pavement during construction:
• Use procedural BMPs to plan construction. For example, phase construction to minimize
compaction, sedimentation, or structural damage to the permeable pavement.
• Use physical Construction SWPPP BMPs and/or grade the site to avoid sediment laden runoff
from reaching permeable pavements.
• Place protective surfaces (e.g., waterproof tarps and steel plates) over any permeable pavement
areas used for construction staging.
%%
• Do not drive sediment -laden construction equipment on the base material or pavement. Do not
allow sediment -laden runoff on permeable pavements or base materials.
• Once the pavement is finished and set, cover the pavement surface with plastic and geotextile to
protect from other construction activities. Close and protect the pavement area until the site is
permanently stabilized.
• Incorporate measures to protect road subgrade from over compaction and sedimentation if
permeable pavement roads are used for construction access.
o Cover the aggregate base or pavement surface with protective geotextile fabric and protect
fabric with steel plates or gravel. Gravel should only be used to protect the fabric placed over
aggregate base.
o Once construction is complete and the site is permanently stabilized, remove protective
geotextile, clean, and complete pavement installation.
Refer to the detailed permeable pavement BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 5, as
well as City of Edmonds Standard Details for general permeable pavement construction criteria.
26 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 347
8.1.c
Bioretention Areas and Rain Gardens
As with permeable pavements, there are many potential applications and site scenarios where bioretention
and rain garden BMPs can be applied. The following techniques highlight the most broadly applicable
techniques to be used to protect bioretention and rain garden BMPs during construction. Refer to the
beginning of this section for construction protection methods that are applicable to all infiltration BMPs,
as well as Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 for general site protection measures. In addition to those techniques,
the following techniques apply specifically for protection of bioretention and rain garden BMPs during
construction:
• Excavation:
o If machinery must operate in the bioretention area for excavation, use lightweight, low
ground -contact pressure equipment and rip the base at completion to scarify soil to a
minimum of 12 inches.
• Protect bioretention soil mix from compaction during construction
o Do not place bioretention soil mix if saturated or during wet periods.
o Check for compaction prior to planting. If compaction occurs, aerate the bioretention soil and
then proceed to plant.
Refer to the detailed bioretention and rain garden BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V,
Chapter 7, as well as City of Edmonds Standard Details for general bioretention and rain garden
construction criteria. YV
Vegetated Roofs
The following additional techniques apply for protection of vegetated roof facilities during construction:
• Because of their location and complexity, vegetated roofs typically require more planning and
coordination effort relative to ground -level landscaping. For new construction, a critical path
approach is highly recommended to establish the sequence of tasks for construction of the
vegetated roof system.
• During construction, it is vitally important that the waterproof membrane be protected once
installed. The waterproofing should be tested prior to placement of the growth media and other
subsequent vegetated roof materials.
Refer to the detailed vegetated roof BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V, for general construction
criteria.
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 27
Packet Pg. 348
8.1.c
6.2 OFF -SITE ANALYSES AND DOCUMENTATION
All projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 4 shall submit as part of their Stormwater Site Plan an
off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts of stormwater discharges. The following
sections detail the analysis and documentation requirements for Category 1 and Category 2 projects.
6.2.1 Category 1 Projects
Category 1 projects shall submit a qualitative analysis of potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges for each upstream drainage system entering a site, and each downstream drainage system
leaving a site. The upstream analysis shall identify and describe points where water enters the site. Any
upstream contributing areas shall be identified and mapped in the project Stormwater Site Plan submittal.
The downstream analysis shall extend from the project site to the receiving water, or up to one -quarter
mile, whichever is less. In many cases, runoff that leaves a project site will enter the City's MS4 within
one -quarter mile. In these instances, the project must evaluate and document downstream conditions up to
and including runoff entry into the City's MS4. In addition, the project proponent shall consult with the
City to determine whether the MS4 has any existing or anticipated capacity issues downstream of the
proposed project.
The qualitative analysis shall identify where and how stormwater runoff will leave the proposed
development site, and describe conditions downstream of the site including any existing or anticipated
future problem areas (e.g., spot flooding, property damage, erosion issues, capacity -limited drainage
systems, etc.). The qualitative analysis must be sufficient for the City to evaluate whether the project has
adequately identified potential impacts and whether proposed mitigation measures are supported by the
analysis. Some "rough" quantitative analyses, which can be based on non -surveyed field data, may be
necessary as part of the qualitative analysis to adequately describe or document the extent of observed
problem areas. Note that any off -site field visits should be conducted during winter months and after
significant precipitation events to identify seasonal issues such as flooding, capacity constraints, or
surface seeps or other indicators of near surface groundwater.
A quantitative analysis may also be required for any project where the project proponent or the City
determines that a more thorough analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of
the conveyance system (e.g., where there is evidence of a risk to downstream systems such as erosion,
flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other related impacts). A
quantitative analysis may include calculations and/or modeling analyses of on -site and off -site water
quality, erosion, slope stability, and other drainage -related impacts that may be caused or aggravated by a
proposed project.
6.2.2 Category 2 Projects
All Category 2 projects shall submit a qualitative analysis of potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges that extend downstream from the site to the receiving water. (If the ultimate discharge point is
to Puget Sound via a culvert owned by BNSF Railway, the analysis must be followed through the
drainage system all the way to Puget Sound.) A quantitative analysis may also be required for any project
deemed to need additional downstream information or where the project engineer or the City determines
that a quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance
system (e.g., where there are known capacity issues or where there is evidence of a risk to downstream
28 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 349
8.1.c
systems such as erosion, flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other
related impacts).
The qualitative analysis must be sufficient for the City to evaluate whether the project has adequately
identified potential impacts and whether proposed mitigation measures are supported by the analysis.
Some "rough" quantitative analysis, which can be based on non -surveyed field data, may be required at
this stage. A downstream analysis of the project for a minimum of one -quarter of a mile is required. The
analysis must also extend upstream to a point beyond any backwater effects caused by the project. The
analysis must include field -inspection of all existing stormwater drainage systems downstream from the
project and a determination of whether the capacity of the drainage system(s) is adequate to handle the
existing flows, flows generated by the proposed project, and any overflow. Adequacy will be evaluated
based on conveyance capacity, flooding problems, erosion damage or potential, amount of freeboard in
channel and pipes, and storage potential within the system. Note that site visits should be conducted
during winter months and after significant precipitation events to identify undocumented surface seeps or
other indicators of near surface groundwater. See the end of this section for specific topics to be discussed
in the qualitative analysis.
When deemed necessary by the project engineer or required by the City, a quantitative analysis shall
include the qualitative analysis describe above, as well as quantitative calculations and/or modeling
analyses of on -site and off -site water quality, erosion, slope stability, and other drainage -related impacts
that may be caused or aggravated by a proposed project. Measures for preventing impacts and for not
aggravating existing impacts shall also be identified. ("Aggravating existing impacts" means increasing
the frequency of occurrence and/or severity of an impact.) The analysis shall document how temporary
and permanent flow control and water quality control measures identified in the Stormwater Site Plan will
mitigate the potential to create new problems or aggravate existing conditions. In many cases, design of
flow control and water quality systems according to the procedures contained in this Addendum and the
SWMMWW will be adequate demonstration of mitigation. However, upon review of this analysis and the
severity of an existing problem, the City may require more detailed analysis and/or additional mitigation
measures. In general, all existing and proposed off -site surface water conveyance systems shall be sized
to convey flows without surcharging the City's storm system (or BNSF culverts under the railroad tracks,
if applicable).
Both the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analyses (when required) shall include descriptions
and/or analyses of the following items. The descriptions shall identify existing or potential problem areas,
and whether adequate mitigation can be identified (or whether more detailed quantitative analysis is
necessary). References to other Stormwater Site Plan sections (e.g., facility sizing, conveyance,
attachments and appendices, etc.) are encouraged to reduce plan redundancy, as long as all of the required
Stormwater Site Plan issues are clearly presented:
• Describe the drainage system between the site and the receiving surface waters. Provide
information on pipe sizes, channel characteristics, and drainage structures. Describe emergency
services located along the flow path (e.g., fire/police stations, hospitals). Describe
environmentally sensitive areas, such as wetlands, etc.
• Describe the upstream drainage tributary to the project. Describe any bypass drainage from the
project which will not be controlled.
• The bulk of the analysis shall focus on highlights of important considerations from the project
overview and off -site analysis sections related to the drainage system and potential problems or
concerns. Existing and potential impacts to be evaluated and mitigated shall include, but not be
limited to:
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 29
Packet Pg. 350
8.1.c
O Conveyance system capacity issues.
o Flooding or bank overtopping.
o Upland erosion impacts, including slope stability and landslide hazards.
O Stream channel erosion (at the outfall location and to the downstream limit of analysis).
O Violations of surface water quality standards as identified in a Basin Plan or a TMDL/Water
Cleanup Plan (e.g., for Lake Ballinger).
O For each existing or potential problem, document: the magnitude of damage caused by the
problem, the general frequency and duration, current mitigation of the problem (if any), the
likely or possible cause of the problem, and whether the project is likely to aggravate the
problem or create a new one.
• Determine whether the project is within any other critical areas or their buffers as defined in
ECDC, and whether any additional requirements apply.
• All areas pertinent to the analyses such as site boundaries, study area boundaries, streets and
prominent features, downstream flow path, potential/existing problems, etc. shall be keyed to
features shown on the project map(s).
6.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR DETENTION VAULTS AND
PIPES T
This section includes design requirements and associated information for detention vaults and detention
pipes. The focus of this section is on the use of detention vaults and pipes to meet Minimum Requirement
No. 5. For other design applications (e.g., to meet Minimum Requirement No. 7), designers must refer to
the SWMMWW.
For Category 1 and 2 projects that must comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5, the final option that
is available for roofs and other hard surfaces under List No. 1 and List No. 2 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5
[d] or [e]) is the use of detention vaults or detention pipes. When using detention vaults or pipes to
comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5 using List No. 1 or List No. 2 in the City of Edmonds, the
following requirements apply. Note that if the project is required to construct a flow control facility to
comply with Minimum Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to
be installed to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5.
The City may waive the requirement to install a detention vault or pipe if the downstream analysis in
Minimum Requirement No. 4, or available City data indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial. Note
that this exemption is rare and most similar to the direct discharge exemption in SWMMWW; qualifying
for this exception will require unique site circumstances and may require additional information or
calculations from the applicant to demonstrate lack of benefit. It shall not be applied to any site which
discharges, direct or indirectly, to a stream, creek, wetland, or floodplain.
30 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 351
8.1.c
6.3.1 Sizing & Design
The City has created simplified sizing techniques for detention vaults and pipes for use in complying with
Minimum Requirement No. 5. The sizing calculations and requirements presented below are designed to
optimize detention facility functions relative to peak flow control as well as runoff "volume managed."
Volume managed is a measure of the difference between facility inflow and outflow rates, and is
evaluated using continuous simulation hydrologic modeling by comparing inflow and outflow over the
entire continuous simulation. Volume managed represents an estimate of the amount of the storm flow
that is attenuated (or removed, for facilities that utilize infiltration) by the flow control facility.
To comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5, detention vaults or pipes must be installed for any site
impervious surfaces totaling greater than or equal to 1,000 square feet that are not managed by other On -
Site Stormwater Management BMPs. This includes areas from multiple types of surfaces listed under the
list options in Minimum Requirement No. 5. For example, if unmanaged flows from roofs plus driveway
areas exceed 1,000 square feet and runoff from both surfaces can be routed to a single vault, a vault shall
be installed. In addition, projects may elect to route "managed" flows to the vault if desired (e.g., where
runoff from an installed On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs cannot be easily separated from runoff
drainage to the vault.) In this scenario, no upsizing of the vault is required for the "managed" areas. Only
the unmanaged surfaces need to be included in the sizing calculations below.
The City of Edmonds has developed standards specifically for vaults and pipes used to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5 only. See City standard detail SD-651 for detention tank requirements specific to
minimum Requirement #5; this detail shall be completed with design information and included with any
plan set proposing detention under Minimum Requirement #5.
For compliance with Minimum Requirement No. 7, SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 12 requirements
apply.
For vaults with contributing areas greater than or equal to 1,000 square feet the following sizing
requirements apply:
• Orifice size shall be 0.5 inches
• Vault interior bottom area = 2 percent of contributing surface area
• Vault minimum active storage depth = 3.0 feet
6.4 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROLS
With each update to the SWMMWW, the Department of Ecology continues to emphasize the importance
of maximizing the use of infiltration for stormwater runoff control. Given the heavy emphasis on
infiltration in the SWMMWW, and thus ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum, it is important to be aware of
related requirements for Underground Injection Controls (UICs).
In certain situations, BMPs that rely on infiltration are classified as UICs and may be regulated by
Ecology under the UIC Program (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 173 218). For more
information on UICs, see SWMMWW Volume I, Chapter 4 (UIC Program).
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 31
Packet Pg. 352
8.1.c
I
2
U
a
32 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 353
8.1.c
7 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Stormwater Site Plans are required for all projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation
of Stormwater Site Plans (as well as for preparation of a Construction SWPPP, in accordance with
Minimum Requirement No. 2), as outlined in Chapter 3 and ECDC 18.30.060.C. This chapter
summarizes the requirements for submittals of stormwater plans, reports, and other documents for review
by the City of Edmonds.
As noted in Section 5.1, Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 3 of
Volume 1 of the SWMMWW. However, the City of Edmonds has developed checklists to facilitate
compliance with Minimum Requirement No. 1 (and thus project submittal and review). This Addendum
includes a summary of core submittal requirements for Category 1 and Category 2 projects as Checklists
1 and 2 in Appendix C.
7.1 CATEGORY 1 STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans for Category 1 projects must address Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5
Detailed descriptions of submittal requirements are provided in Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3. A
schematic showing the components of a typical Category 1 project submittal is presented in Figure 7.1.
Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components
Site Development Drawings and
Reports and Construction SWPPP Drawings
Documentation (i.e., construction drawings)
Stormwater Site Plan Report,
Supporting Documents, and Calculations
Soils Report
Construction SWPPP Narrative
Establishment of Maintenance Covenant
Appendices
Figure 7.1. Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components.
7.2 CATEGORY 2 STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans for Category 2 projects include the full submittal package meeting all minimum
requirements. The Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan submittal package includes the following
7. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 33
Packet Pg. 354
8.1.c
components: Stormwater Site Plan Report, Site Development Drawings, Soils Report, Construction
SWPPP, Operations and Maintenance Manual, Maintenance Covenant, and any plan appendices. A
schematic showing the components of a typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan submittal package is
presented in Figure 7.2. The Construction SWPPP consists of two parts: a narrative report and drawings,
which should be included in the plan set with the other Site Development Drawings. Detailed descriptions
of submittal requirements are provided in Appendix C, Checklist 2.
Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components
Site Development Drawings
Reports and (i.e., construction drawings)
Documentation
Stormwater Site Plan Report, General Drawings
Supporting Documents, and Calculations Construction SWPPP Drawings
Soils Report Grading/Earthwork Drawings
Construction SWPPP Narrative Plan/Profile Drawings
Operation and Maintenance Manual Detail Drawings
Establishment of Maintenance Covenant
Appendices
Figure 7.2. Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components.
34 7. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 355
8.1.c
Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater
Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
Packet Pg. 356
8.1.c
U
a
Packet Pg. 357
OCTOBER 2021
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.c
Appendix B — Methods for Determining
Design Infiltration Rates
9%
j
Packet Pg. 358
8.1.c
U
a
Packet Pg. 359
OCTOBER 2021
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.c
Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project
Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure
Elements
Packet Pg. 360
8.1.c
U
Q
Packet Pg. 361
8.1.c
Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main
On -Site Stormwater Management BM Ps
j
Packet Pg. 362
8.1.c
U
a
Packet Pg. 363
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 18.30
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sections:
18.30.000 Purposes.
18.30.010 Definitions.
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
18.30.030 Applicability.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
18.30.050 Administration.
18.30.060 Requirements.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal.
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
18.30.000 Purposes.
Page 1/27
A. To set forth standards for managing stormwater runoff from construction and development sites to minimize
1. Degradation of surface water quality by controlling the scouring and sedimentation of creeks, streams,
wetlands, ponds, lakes, other water bodies.
2. Degradation of groundwater quality.
3. Damage to adjacent and other downstream private properties from erosion or other impacts from
stormwater runoff.
4. Damage of City -owned parcels, City roads, rights -of -way and associated infrastructure.
B. To comply with requirements in the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Municipal Stormwater Permit as issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology).
C. To complement site planning activities that minimize:
1. Impervious surfaces area.
2. The loss of native or non-native site vegetation.
3. The generation of stormwater runoff.
D. To make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site development; to
require LID be considered at the site planning stage; and to implement LID BMPs unless they are infeasible.
E. To require that all publicly -owned and privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control best
management practices (BMPs)/Facilities are operated, maintained and repaired in manner that conforms to this
chapter.
F. To provide the authority for the City to inspect privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control
BMPs/Facilities.
G. To provide enforcement procedures for ensuring compliance with this chapter.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 364
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 2/27
18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
Arterial. A road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets considered
collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to abutting
property. See also RCW 35.78.010, RCW 36.86.070, and RCW 47.05.021.
Adjustment. A variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments provide
substantially equivalent environmental protection.
Applicant. The owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or approvals
described in this chapter.
Approval. The proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public works
Director or their designee.
Best management practices (BMPs). The schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures,
and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the City that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or
reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters of Washington State.
Bioretention BMPs. Engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile, and
either retain or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2-04.4-2019 Stonrynwater Management
Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW), r'ia�Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design
specifications.
Category 1 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.I through No.5. See ECDC
18.30.60. C.
Category 2 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.I through No.9. See ECDC
18.30.60.C.
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL). An individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
impact the quality of stormwater and, the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology approved erosion and sediment
control course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
City's municipal separate storm sewer system or "MS4." A conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads
with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains)
that are owned or operated by the City of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater, and
are not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 122.2, and which is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise designated by
Ecology pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26.
Clearing. The destruction and removal of vegetation by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
Commercial Agriculture. Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities involved
in the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial
agriculture when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain
idle for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or
unless the activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and
ongoing agricultural activity.
Common plan of development or sale. A site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be
taking place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but still under a single plan.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 365
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 3/27
Examples include: 1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the separate phases or
filings/lots will be constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development where lots are
sold to separate builders); 2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still under a
consistent plan for long-term development; 3) projects in a contiguous area that maybe unrelated but still under the
same contract, such as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and 4) linear
projects such as roads, pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the
disturbed area of the entire plan must be used in determine permit requirements.
Converted vegetation (areas). The change in land cover changed from native vegetation, pasture scrub/shrub, or
unmaintained non-native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or where native vegetation is converted to pasture.
Creek. Is synonymous with "streams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.320.
Detention facility. An above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores stormwater
runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system. There is little
or no infiltration of stored stormwater.
Development. Land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions from
timber land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of hard surface that is not part of a
routine maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or expansion
of a building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied in
Chapter 58.17 RCW
Director. The City's Public Works and Utilities Director or a designee with an appropriate background in
engineering or another related discipline.
Discharge point. The location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through
the City's MS4 facilitiesBMPs designed to infiltrate.
Ecology. The Washington State Department of Ecology.
Effective impervious surface. Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to
a drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if: 1) the runoff is
dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 — "Full Dispersion," as
described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW; 2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in accordance with
downspout Full Infiltration Systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or 3) approved continuous
runoff modeling methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
Erodible or leachable materials. Wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or
chemical characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled,
uncovered process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
Erosion. The wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents, including
such processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water, wind, ice,
or gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
Excavation. The mechanical removal of earth material.
Exception. Relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
Fill. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
Groundwater. Water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body.
Hard surface. An impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 366
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 4/27
Highway. A main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State Route 99, State Route
524, and portions of State Route 104, that are classified as principal arterials in the City's comprehensive
transportation plan.
Illicit discharge. Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the City's MS4, groundwaters, or a water body,
except as expressly allowed by ECDC Chapter 7.200.
Impervious surface. A non -vegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil
mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A non -vegetated surface area which causes water to run off
the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior
to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and
oiled, macadam or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered
retention/detention facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the
thresholds for application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities
shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be
considered impervious surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and
other areas that have modified runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or
low permeability liners are to be considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns,
landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, etc.) served by underdrains may be considered partially pervious if the
underdrain is set a minimum of 8 inches above the in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility
bottom.
Lake. An inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
Land disturbing activity. Any activity that results in a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and non -
vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing activities include but are not limited to demolition,
clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures and road
construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices, including
landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility maintenance
is not considered land disturbing activity if conducted according to established standards and procedures.
Low impact development (LID). A stormwater and land use strategy that strives to mimic pre -disturbance
hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation,
use of on -site features, site planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a
project design.
LID Best Management Practices (BMPs). Distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a project
design, that emphasize pre -disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and
transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof
downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water
re -use.
LID principles. Land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features, and
site planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
Maintenance. Repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and
equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse
hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of
structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities, including cases
where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as long as the
functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed,
fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to
stormwater facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up
pollutants (i.e., sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct
defects as identified in the maintenance standards of Chapter-4Appendix A, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 367
8.1.d
Edmonds Page 5/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Maximum extent practicable (MEP). Refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which
reads as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge
of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants.
MS4. The City's municipal separate storm sewer system.
Native vegetation. Vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds, indigenous to the coastal region
of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the site. Examples
include trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs
such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and
fireweed.
Natural drainage systems and outfalls. The location of the channels, swales, and other non -manmade conveyance
systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing for the subject property, either from
maps or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
New Development. Land disturbing activities, including Class IV -general forest practices that are conversions
from timberland to other uses; structural development, including construction or installation of a building or other
structure; creation of hard surfaces; and subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied
in Chapter 58.17 RCW. ECDC 18.30 does not distinguish the difference between new development and
redevelopment: all proiects in Edmonds shall meet the reauirements for new development.
New Impervious Surface. A surface that is: 1) changed from a pervious surface to an impervious surface (e.g_
resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal"), asphalt, concrete, or an
impervious structure); or 2) upgraded from gravel to chip seal, asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure; or 3)
upgraded from chip seal to asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure. Note that if asphalt or concrete has been
overlaid by seal, the existing condition should be considered as asphalt or concrete.
Outfall. A point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves the City's MS4 and enters
a surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes, tunnels, or other
conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to convey primarily
surface waters (i.e., culverts).
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs. A synonym for Low Impact Development BMPs.
Permeable pavement. Pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or porous
paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an aggregate base
that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
Pervious Surface. Any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include lawn,
landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
Person. Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or City government unit, however designated.
Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS). Those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS). Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities
(as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or
chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated
with an inert, non -leachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 368
8.1.d
Edmonds Page 6/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS). Any pervious surface subject to )—vehicular use, 2)L
industrial activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); or 31storage of erodible or leachable
materials, wastes, or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, use of pesticides
and fertilizers, or Sloss of soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and
landscaped areas including: golf courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
Pre -developed condition. The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-
American settlement. The pre -developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable,
historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
Project: Any proposed action to alter or develop a site.
Project site. That portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities, new hard
surfaces, or replaced hard surfaces. For projects that involve land disturbing activity on one or more parcels and/or
land disturbing activity in the City right-of-way, the "Project site" includes all areas of land disturbance. If the
project is part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be used in
determining permit requirements.
Rain garden. A non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and adapted
plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and to allow
stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
Receiving waterbody or Receiving waters. Naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water bodies,
such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a MS4
discharges.
Redevelopment. ECDC 18.30 does not distinguish the difference between new development and redevelopment; all
projects in Edmonds shall meet the requirements for new development. Where existing unmitigated surfaces are to
remain, the additional "retro-fit" requirement per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i
Replaced hard surface. For structures means the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the foundation.
For other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Replaced impervious surface. For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces down
to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and
replacement.
Roadway. Traveled hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
Road -related project. A project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of roadway,
shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded. Frontage improvements
constructed as a requirement for a development project are not consider a road -roadway project.
Runoff. Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams,
springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow ground water. It also means the portion of rainfall or
other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
Site. The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to development. For
road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site and the right-of-way boundaries
define the site. Note that drainage impacts are generally assessed for the "project site", under separate definition.
Slope. The degree of deviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio, percent, or in
degrees. Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the vertical distance
(rise), as 2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the horizontal
plane, with a 90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 369
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 7/27
Soil. The unconsolidated mineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that serves as a
natural medium for the growth of land plants.
Source control BMPs. A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with
storm water through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants.
The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control BMPs are physical,
structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater.
Operational Source Control BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering
stormwater. See Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
Stormwater facility. A constructed component of a stormwater drainage system, designed and constructed to
perform a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes,
swales, ditches, culverts, street gutters, detention ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices,
catch basins, oil/water separators, and biofiltration swales.
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The Washington State Department of
Ecology's 24Q�2019(as ri,orao�' ^` Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Referred to
as the 20142019 SWMMWW.
Stormwater site plan. The comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary
for regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed development project for compliance with stormwater requirements.
Contents of the Stormwater Site Plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site
characteristics. It includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Construction SWPPP) and a
Permanent Stormwater Control Plan (PSC Plan). Guidance on preparing a Stormwater Site Plan is contained in
Chapter 3 of Volume I of the SWMMWW.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/Facilities. Detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No.6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No.7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
Threshold discharge area. An on site area within a project site that drains to either -draining to a single natural
discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as
determined by the shortest flowpath). The examples min Figure 4971: Example TDA Delineations below,
-
presented in Volume 1 of the c.x"MN43A AI illustrate this definition. The purpose of this definition is to clarify how
the thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 370
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
8.1.d
Page 8/27
Example of a Site with a
Example of a Site with
Example of a Site with
Single Natural Discharge
Multiple Natural
Multiple Natural Discharges
and a Single Threshold
Discharges and a Single
and Multiple Threshold
Discharge Area
Threshold Discharge Area
Discharge Areas
Natural
-Natural Natural
Natural Natural
• �{3`tschar a~--�..-_
g
Discha"
rge-..""
".- '"
bischaige_
-.
v' Area
"""discharge----•
Area 1 Area 2
.aiscf3aW----
Area I Area 2
THRESHOLD �'
...
...........THRE HOLE
THRESIJOLD THRESHOLD
DlgEIdARGE
IN5C ARG - ' ,;'
DISCHARGE D15CFlARt :.
k AREA -
EArr
AREA
AREA �. -A EA.2
(Shaded} 4
tit
edj
(shade
' Natural
Natural
Natural `
Discharge
Discharge
Discharge
Location
Location
Location
Y4 Mife Downstream -_-----_--
-- 1_--_-- -
(shortest flow path) %�
V I
Version: September 8, 2015July 2021
Packet Pg. 371
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Figure 1: Example TDA Delineations
8.1.d
Page 9/27
Example of a Project Site
Example of a Project Site
Example of a Project Site with
with a single natural
with multiple natural
multiple natural discharges and
discharge and a single TDA
discharges and a single TDA
multiple TDAs
'
.._.�'---
Jy ,TDA -
TDA
Single
- TDA
2
Natural
r
Natural J 1
Natural
discharge Greater than
location
discharge
discharge
1I4 mile
locations
114 milelocations r ` 114 miles
f
1/4 mile
i
i
Example of a road project with multiple
d1wharge points and a single TDA
o
mBecause the right -most discharge
. connecls to the other two discharge flow
�I roadway crown
paths within I mite, all areas are
�i connected as one TDA.
Discharge 114 mde 114 mile
location — -
114 mile -.
c
S
3 / Example of a road project with multiple
` / discharge points and multiple TDAs.
�1 Note: Shaded
areas represent
- Discharge 11+i mle the limits of the
location project site.
11
4 NOT TO SCALE
Example TDA Delineations
DEPARTMENT OF Revised March 2018
ECOLOGYPlease see http.IA+vwwecyy wa.govloopyright htmf for copyright notice including permissions,
State of Washington limitation of liability, and disclaimer.
Version: September 8, 2015July 2021
Packet Pg. 372
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 10/27
Vehicular Use. Regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are subject to
regular vehicular use: roads, un-vegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway,
driveways, parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: sidewalks not subject to drainage from roads for
motor vehicles, paved bicycle pathways separated from and not subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles,
restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance access roads.
Waterbody. Surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
Waters of the state. Includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR Subpart 122.2 within
the geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW which
includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters
and water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
Wetlands. As defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
A. The Public Works and Utilities Director shall administer this chapter and shall be referred to as the Director.
B. The Director shall have the authority to develop, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to administer
and enforce this chapter per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120, such as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
C. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less
protective of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective
requirements shall prevail.
D. The Director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements on a project or site to meet the purpose of
this chapter based on site -specific factors including, but not limited to, location, soil conditions, slope, and
designated use.
E. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do
they indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local
laws and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
F. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental
impacts, and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.030 Applicability.
A. This chapter applies to applications_
1_-sSubmitted on or after January 1, 244-'-2022, and
2_ pplieatiens-sSubmitted prior to January 1, 2017, which have not started construction by January 1, 2022,
and
4-3. Submitted prior to January 1, 2022, which have not started construction by July 1, 2027.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 373
Edmonds Page 11/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
B. This chapter applies to the following actions on sites that discharge to the City's MS4 or discharges to waters of
the state whether or not a City -issued permit is required:
1. Land -disturbing activity, or
2. Creation of new hard surfaces, or
3. Replacement of existing hard surfaces, or
4. Conversion of pervious surfaces, or
5. New connections to the City's MS4, or
6. Any other actions that can increase the volume or rate of stormwater runoff, or cause the generation of
pollutants, from the site.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
A. Full Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
1. Forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from timberland to other uses, are exempt from the provisions of the minimum requirements.
2. Commercial agriculture practices that involve working land for production are generally exempt. However,
land conversion from timberland to agriculture and the construction of impervious surfaces are not exempt.
3. Construction of drilling sites, waste management pits, and associated access roads, and construction of
transportation and treatment infrastructure such as pipelines, natural gas treatment plants, natural gas
pipeline compressor stations, and crude oil pumping stations are exempt. Operators are encouraged to
implement and maintain best management practices to minimize erosion and control sediment during and
after construction activities to help ensure protection of surface water quality during storm events.
4. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are exempt: pothole and square -cut patching,
overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of
coverage, shoulder grading, reshaping/regrading drainage systems, crack sealing, resurfacing with in -kind
material without expanding the road prism, pavement preservation activities that do not expand the road
prism, and vegetation maintenance.
B. Partial Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are partially exempt from the
provisions of this chapter:
1Underground utility projects that replace the ground surface with in -kind material or materials with similar
runoff characteristics are only subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2, Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention.
a. Utility installations as part of a development project, whether in the right-of-way or on private
property, are not considered an underground utility project for the sake of this partial exemption.
2. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are considered development, and therefore are
not categorically exempt. .
a. Removing and replacing a paved surface to base course or a lower level, or repairing the pavement
base: if impervious suffaces are not expanded, Minimm Requirements No. 1 No. 5 apply when the
thfesholds identified for development projeets in ECDC 19.30.060 are met. Where appropriate, project
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 374
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 12/27
proponents are eneouraged to look for opportunities to use permeable and porous pavements, These are
considered replaced hard surfaces.
b. Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism or paving graveled
shoulders: these are considered new shard surfaces and are subjeet to the mini ..w
requirements that are triggered when the thresholds identified for developmen4 projeets in ECDC
183n 060 are me
c. Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, asphalt, or concrete; or upgrading from gravel to asphalt
or concrete; or upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal") to asphalt or concrete:
these are considered new imper hard surfaces and afe ubje t to the milliffFamor.s tha4
afe triggered when the thfeshelds idewified fer develepment pr-ejeets in ECDC 18.30.060 are met..
18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The Director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by ECDC 18.30.050.A.3 for
compliance with this chapter when:
a. An application for a City permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC Title 18 or 19, or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
2. In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
Stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable City code, a Stormwater Site Plan as described in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (see
ECDC 18.30.060) and any other information required by the Director.
B. Inspections.
1. The Director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential, and
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components, and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed, and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
Stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities, and
e. Post -Construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 375
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 13/27
2. When reasonably required by the Director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with
local, state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by
the applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in ECDC Chapter 15.00 shall be paid.
18.30.060 Requirements.
A. Documents. The sources of the stormwater management requirements for the City are from the following
documents:
1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification date january 16,
2044August 1, 2019
2. 2414 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
In the event of conflicts between the various provisions, the more stringent provision shall apply.
B. Illicit Discharges and Connections. Non-stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, into the MS4,
groundwaters, or a water body from any developed or undeveloped lands are prohibited per ECDC Chapter
7.200.
C. Thresholds and Applicability
1. The thresholds outlined in this section are only applicable to ECDC 18.30.060.C. See also the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for supplemental information on thresholds.
a. All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
b. Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5. Category 1
includes projects that:
i. Result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
c. Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9. Category 2
includes projects that:
i. Result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
iii. Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
2. Additional Requirements for road -related projects. For road -related projects, runoff from the new and
replaced hard surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and sidewalks) and the converted vegetation
areas shall meet all the minimum requirements only if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more
and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits. Otherwise, the minimum
requirements only apply to the new hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas that exceed the
thresholds in (1) above. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the width of the
right-of-way.
3New Connections to the City's MS4 when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the
definition of development. Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but that wish to connect
directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval.
For sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of hard surface area to the City's
MS4, the project shall comply with the requirement of this chapter, treating all hard surfaces to be drained
to the City system as new hard surfaces, unless applicant can demonstrate that the site will discharge in the
same manner and quantities prior to the proposed project. Applicant shall account for natural dispersion
and/or infiltration which may be occurring if these new hard surfaces area currently drain through pervious
areas.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 376
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 14/27
treatment (such as those outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D [1] th ough [91) may be required if the conneeti
poses any risk to downstream systems such as erosion, flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water—
qualitydegradatien, or- athefielated wets.
-34. Minimum Requirements may be met for an equivalent (flow and pollution characteristics) area. The
equivalent area may be within the same TDA. If the equivalent area is outside the TDA, or off -site, the
equivalent area must drain to the same receiving water and the guidance for equivalent facilities using in_
basin transfers must be followed, as detailed in Appendix D of Volume 1 of SWMMWW.
D. Minimum Technical Requirements. This section describes the minimum technical requirements for stormwater
management at development sites.
1. Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
The City shall require a Stormwater Site Plan from all projects meeting the thresholds in ECDC
18.30.060.C. Stormwater Site Plans shall use site -appropriate development principles to retain native
vegetation and minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum.
2. Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
a. Thresholds:
i. All development projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment
and other pollutants into receiving waters. Compliance with this minimum requirement can be
achieved for an individual site if the site is covered under Ecology's General NPDES Permit
for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities and fully implementing
the requirements of that permit.
ii. A Construction SWPPP is required for all projects which a) result in 2,000 square feet or
more of new plus replaced hard surface area, b) where a structure with an exterior hard
surface area of at least 2,000 square feet is being demolished, c) which disturb 7,000 square
feet or more of land, or d) when the site falls within the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard
Area, Landslide Hazard Area or steep slope critical area. Projects that do not meet any of the
above criteria are not required to prepare a Construction SWPPP, but must consider all of the
elements listed below for Construction SWPPPs and develop controls for all Construction
SWPPP elements that pertain to the project site.
b. General Requirements:
The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in
the narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation
to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project. Each of the
thirteen elements referenced below must be considered and included in the SWPPP unless site
conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly
justified in the narrative of the SWPPP.
ii. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted
pursuant to an approved site development plan (e.g., building permit, subdivision approval)
that establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling. These permitted
clearing and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas,
buffers, native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas as required by the City,
shall be delineated on the site plans and the development site.
iii. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final
stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs
contained in Chapter 4 of Volume II of the SWMMWW.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 377
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
c. Seasonal Work Limitations:
Page 15/27
From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities may only be
authorized by the City if it can be demonstrated that silt -laden runoff will be prevented from leaving
the site through a combination of the following:
Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to
receiving waters; and
ii. Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
iii. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d
below.
Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the City may expand or restrict the
seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing
and grading limitations, except for sites lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020.F:
Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs,
ii. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the
soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil, and
iii. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the
site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities.
d. Construction SWPPP Elements
Construction SWPPP elements are required in accordance with Chapter 23, Section 2'-5.23.4.2
of Volume I of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
3. Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution
All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the
City. Source control BMPs must be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with Volume IV of
the SWMMWW. All single family residential projects shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs
from SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
4. Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural
location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project
site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient
properties. The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the
ultimate outfa111ocation (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require
energy dissipation.
To demonstrate compliance with this core requirement, all projects shall submit an off -site qualitative
analysis. If an existing problem (or potential future problem after development) is identified, mitigation
will be required to prevent worsening of that problem. A quantitative analysis may be required for any
project deemed to need additional information or where the project proponent or the City determines that a
quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance system.
See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on complying with this requirement.
5. Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 378
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
a. Applicability:
Page 16/27
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs are required in accordance with the following project
thresholds, standards, and lists to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on -site to the extent
feasible without causing flooding or erosion impacts. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Project Thresholds:
There are five project scenarios outlined below that determine the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management. The first four scenarios apply to projects that
discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4. The fifth scenario applies to project discharges that
do not enter the City's MS4. Note that more than one of the five scenarios may apply to a given
proj ect:
Retrofit. Projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain
existing hard surfaces on the parcel or common plan of development that do not drain to an
approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs to manage a portion of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after
project completion. BMPs from List No.l (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d) shall be applied to a
minimum of 25 percent of those existing unmanaged surfaces, but to no more than the area
equal to the proposed new plus replaced hard surfaces.
Within the Perrinville Creek basin, the retrofit value shall be increased from 25% to 50%.
Only for those existing unmanaged hard surfaces that remain after project completion,
applicants are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for
these existing surfaces (as is required under ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b [ii] and [iii] below).
However, if it is determined that the minimum percentage
requirement cannot be met due to BMP infeasibility, documentation of BMP infeasibility is
required. In addition, when runoff from exiting -unmanaged hard surfaces is mixed with runoff
from new plus Fepla eamanaged hard surfaces, those BMPs must be selected and designed i-n-
-dan e witl the 0 epAs for- maaagem&4 ofnewplus -epl ee for all areas which
contribute runoff to the BMPha� (per sections [ii] and [iii] below). See the
SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site
Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
This requirement is specific to minimum requirement #5 only. The surfaces treated by this
requirement do no need to be added to project thresholds or mitigated under other minimum
requirements. Impervious surfaces disturbed solely for installation of BMPs proposed to
satisfy this requirement need not be consider as replaced hard surfaces for the project.
ii. Category 1. Category 1 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4
and are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.l for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iii. Category 2. Category 2 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4
and are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
Version: September 8, 201 5July 2021
Packet Pg. 379
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 17/27
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.2 for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may
choose to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iv. Direct Discharge Requirement. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the
City's MS4 (in accordance with the restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound
presented in Section2-.5-.73.4.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the
LID Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or
full dispersion, but must implement BMP T5.13 (Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth);
BMPs T5.1OA Downspout Full Infiltration Systems, T5.IOB Downspout Dispersion Systems,
or T5.1 OB Perforated Stub -out Connections; and BMP T5.11 Concentrated Flow Dispersion
or T5.12 Sheet Flow Dispersion; if feasible for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land
disturbed. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details
on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibili ymust meet the following:
V. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to implement
one of the following:
a. Project sites may discharge to the downstream private property (e.g., projects located
above BNSF property) with approval from the downstream property owner(s).
b. Project sites may discharge runoff to an on -site system.
For sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, a geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical
engineer is required for the on -site system. On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs from List No.I in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d shall be
evaluated for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed.
Projects are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document
infeasibility. The project applicant may be subject to an extra permit
processing fee for City review of the geotechnical analysis. Projects are
required to comply with all other applicable City requirements, such as
ECDC 19.10 (earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas).
ii. For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii shall be
followed to evaluate site appropriate BMP's.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 380
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 18/27
c_Subject to prior approval by the City, project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's
MS4. A quantitative downstream analysis in accordance with Minimum Requirement
No. 4 and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum will be required. If the City's MS4 does
not have adequate capacity to receive the applicant's pumped flows, the applicant is
required to install an on -site detention system to store runoff and pump it to the MS4 at
an approved rate.
vi. Projects under 2,000 SF of new plus replaced hard surfaces which discharge to an existing
BMP with a surfaces overflow, shall expand the BMP size for the proposed new plus replaced
hard surfaces based on existing design data.
i}i. Alternatively, or where existing design data can not be found, the project shall
discharge to a separate system appropriate sized per the designer.
c. LID Performance Standard
For projects that elect to meet the LID Performance Standard to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii)
and (iii), Stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations
for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 8 percent of the 2-year peak flow to 50 percent of
the 2-year peak flow from the project site. Refer to the Standard Flow Control Requirement section in
Minimum Requirement No. 7 for information about the assignment of the pre -developed condition.
Project sites that must also meet Minimum Requirement No. 7 shall match flow durations between 8
percent of the 2-year flow through the full 50-year flow.
Projects meeting the LID performance criteria are still required to comply with the
requirements for BMP T5.13: Post -Construction Soils Quality and Depth, to the maximum
extent feasible.
d. List No.I for Category 1 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
For projects that elect to use List No. 1 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum; and Competing Needs
Criteria listed in Chapter 5-3 of Volume V-I of the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapterf
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Roofs:
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in 0t Volume V of the
SWMMWW_
i-. ii. -Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Seetie ff 3.1.' w
Volume ITV of the SWMMWW.
ii,iii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter c of Volume V, or Bioretention in
accordance with Chapter-7BMP T7.30 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or
bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the
overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 381
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 19/27
iii-.iv. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1 OB in Seetion 3.' .2 of -Volume
ITV of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
iv-.vi. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
ITV of the SWMMWW.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in r''�5-af-Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
ii. Full infiltration for equivalent surfaces areas per BMP T5.10A and/or Permeable Pavement in
accordance with BMP T5.15 in Ch^orVolume V of the SWMMWW, or
ii-iii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14 ^ in Chapter- 5 e fNle ff fie N' _or Bioretention
in accordance with BMP T7.30Chapter- 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden
or bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the
overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
ii}iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in 0i Volume V of the SWMMWW.
iv-. v. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3. The --
City
Minimum Requirement #4, or available City data, indioate that peak flow eonlrol is not
e. List No.2 for Category 2 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
For projects that elect to use List No. 2 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (iii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW; and Competing Needs Criteria listed in Chapter 5-3 of Volume V—I of
the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in C4a of -Volume V of the
SWMMWW_
i-. ii. Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Seeti ... 3. 1.1 of
Volume ITV of the SWMMWW.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 382
8.1.d
Edmonds Page 20/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
iii. Bioretention in accordance with BMP T7.30 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain
garden or bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below
the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area drainingto o it. Q
H. 1318feten4leff (See (C;kapter4 01 Volume 3.1 elthe SNYA4?,4NVNV) taetlities that have a miampmH
herizon4ally below the is least 5 the t
0
M
projected s�urfaee area overflow which at pereent of
draining
00
surface area to '
U
0
iii,iv. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP TS.I OB in Seetio 3.1.2 of Volume
U
III of the SWMMWW.
waU
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3.
r
c
iv,vi. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP TS.I OC in Seel on 3.1.3 of Volume
m
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in aecor-danee with the Edmonds StormitwterAddendum. Note that if
L
the is to flow f4eility to Minimum
projeet required eonstruet a eon4rol eomply with
Requirement No. 7 ECDC 19.30.060.D.7), detention is to be installed
(per a vault not required
m
to Nfininium Requirement No. 5. in the City the
R
meet addition, may waive requiremen
install detention if the dovmstream in Mininmm Requiremen4 #4,
a vault analysis or available
E
data,City indioate that peak flow control is not benefieial.
0
v!
Other Hard Surfaces:
`o
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in C ^ Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
c`o
d
x
ii. Full infiltration for equivalent surfaces areas per BMP T5.I OA in Volume III of the
U
SWMMWW and/or Permeable pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
a
iii. Bioretention (See Q'^�Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
5
surface area draining to it.
y
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
o
accordance with BMP T5.11 in r1i�, Rpte S-of-Volume V of the SWMMWW.
00
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum 6.3. Note
U
U
w
to N4iaiffPafn Requif:ement
a�
meet .
rn
install detepAioa if the deA%stream
a vault analysis
N
r;*data, 1; *o that .o fl v .., r.r l :not oaoa l
., •
f. Overflows: All non -dispersion BMPs sized solely for Minimum Requirement #5 are anticipated to
I
have an overflow discharge on a semi -regular basis and therefore requires a sub -surface piped
connection directly to the MS 4 system.
E
i. In order to eliminate a piped overflow connection, the project shall be designed to infiltrate
100% of the modelled 100-year storm per continuous modeling. A safe and certain surface
overflow path must still be provided and may not negatively impact adjacent properties.
Q
ii. In cases where the City MS4 is not in a location where a reasonable connection can be made
for a project in capable of fully infiltrating per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.fi above:
• Extensions equal to or less than the length of the project frontage would be anticipated
and generally not consider for an exception to 18.30.060.D.5.f.i.
coo
a
Version: September 4 201 cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 383
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 21/27
• Extension exceeding the project frontage length will be considered on a case -by -case
basis for exception to 18.30.060.D.5.f.i.
6. Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment
a. Project Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only
consider those hard and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces
and the converted vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment
facilities:
Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or
more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or
ii. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including
permeable pavements — is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
b. Treatment -Type Thresholds and Facility Sizing:
Treatment -Type Thresholds in accordance with Step 2 roil Control), Step n (Phosphorus
Treatment), Step 5 (Enhanced Treatment), and Step 6 (Basie Treatmeno of Chapter , Section
2-41 2, Volume V—I1I of the SWMMWW. Phosphorus treatment shall be required for projects
draining to Hall Creek and Lake Ballinger.
ii. Treatment Facility Sizing, including Water Quality Design Storm Volume, Water Quality
Design Flow Rate, and Downstream Facilities, e -in accordance with Chapter 23, Section
''�3.4.6, Volume I of the SWMMWW.
c. Treatment Facility Selection, Design, and Maintenance
Stormwater treatment facilities shall be:
Selected in accordance with the process identified in Chapter 41 of Volume III, and Chapter
2 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
ii. Designed in accordance with the design criteria in Volume V of the SWMMWW, and
iii. Maintained in accordance with the maintenance schedule in Volume V of the SWMMWW
d. Additional Requirements
The discharge of untreated stormwater from pollution -generating hard surfaces to ground water
will not be authorized by the City except for infiltration or dispersion of runoff through BMPs
designed and implemented per ECDC 18.30 and SWMMWW. All associate-' m ne ff'must be
treatment in aeeordanee with Chapter 5, Volume V and Chapter 7, Volume 3.1 of the treated using On site Stermwater Management BNIPs designed to provide the required level of
or by infiltration thfough soils meeting the soil suitability criteria in Chapter 3 of Volume H! of thee
cMrnW.
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control
a Applicability: Flow control is required on projects meeting the thresholds summarized below to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 384
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 22/27
Flow control in accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that
discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound subject to the restrictions of
the TDA Exemption (aka. direct discharge exemption)_per SWMMWW Section 3.4.7 of Volume I -
(other minimum requirements may still apply). See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 153_4.7 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
If the discharge drains to a stream that leads to a wetland, or to a wetland that has an outflow to a
stream, both this minimum requirement (Minimum Requirement No. 7) and Minimum Requirement
No. 8 apply.
a-.b_Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider only
those impervious, hard, and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces
and the converted vegetation areas. The following circumstances require achievement of the standard
flow control requirement for western Washington:
Projects in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more in a
threshold discharge area, or ,
ii. Projects that convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or convert 2.5
acres or more of native vegetation to pasture in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there is a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site, or
iii. Projects that through a combination of hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas cause a
0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs) increase or greater in the 100-year flow frequency from a
threshold discharge area as estimated using the Western Washington Hydrology Model or
other approved model and one -hour time steps (or a 0.15 cfs increase or greater using 15-
minute time steps).
b:c_Standard Flow Control Requirement (applies to discharges directly or indirectly to the City's MS4,
except for projects that meet the direct discharge requirements outlined in "a" above and/or projects
discharging to Perrinville Creek): Stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to
pre -developed durations for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 50 percent of the 2-year
peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow. The pre -developed condition to be matched shall be a
forested land cover unless reasonable, historic information is available that indicates the site was
prairie prior to settlement (modeled as "pasture" in the Western Washington Hydrology Model). This
standard requirement is waived for sites that will reliably infiltrate all the runoff from hard surfaces
and converted vegetation areas.
d. Perrinville Basin Flow Control Standard (applies to all discharges within the Perrinville Creek basin)
shall be an elevated level of flow control design. Discharges to the Perrinville Creek Basin shall
maintain the durations of high flows at their predevelopment levels for all flows greater than one-half
of the 2-year flow up to the 50-year flow AND holding the 100-year peak flow rate at its
predevelopment level. The predevelopment peak flow rates for the 2-year and 10-year runoff events
are also intended to be maintained.
Ee_Additional Requirement: Flow Control BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in
accordance with Volume III of the SWMMWW or an approved equivalent.
8. Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetlands Protection
a. Applicability: The requirements below apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a
wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 385
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 23/27
b. Thresholds: The thresholds identified in Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment, and
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control shall also be applied to determine the applicability of
this requirement to discharges to wetlands.
c. Standard Requirement: Projects shall comply with Guide Sheets No. 1 through No. 3 in Appendix I-D
of the SWMMWW. The hydrologic analysis shall use the existing land cover condition to determine
the existing hydrologic conditions unless directed otherwise by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction.
d. Additional Requirements: Stormwater treatment and flow control facilities shall not be built within a
natural vegetated buffer, except for:
Necessary conveyance systems as approved by the City; or
ii. As allowed in wetlands approved for hydrologic modification or treatment in accordance with
Guide Sheet 2 in Appendix I-D of the SWMMWW.
An adopted and implemented basin plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of
Appendix 1 of the Phase II NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
9. Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance
An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of
the SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The
party (or parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and
maintenance manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance
manual shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the
property to the new owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be
retained in the appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken
shall be kept and be available for inspection.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeals.
A. Exceptions.
1. The Director may approve a request for an exception to the minimum requirements of this chapter
following legal public notice of an application for an exception and of the Director's decision on the
application. All legal public notice related to this request for an exception shall be in the manner prescribed
in ECDC 20.03.002 and the applicant shall pay all costs to publish the legal public notices required by this
provision. The Director shall provide and keep written findings of fact of the decision.
2. The approval of the exception shall only be granted when the applicant demonstrates that the requirement
would cause a severe and unexpected economic hardship. To determine whether the requirement imposes a
severe and unexpected economic hardship on the project applicant, the applicant must document for City
review and approval, all of the following, at a minimum:
a. The current, pre -project use of the site; and
b. How application of the requirement(s) for which an exception is being requested restricts the proposed
use of the site compared to the restrictions that existed prior to adoption of this chapter; and
c. The possible remaining uses of the site if the exception were not granted; and
d. The possible uses of the site that would have been allowed prior to the adoption of this chapter; and
e. A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements
versus the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of requirements that existed prior
to adoption of the requirements of this chapter; and
Version: September 8, 201 5July 2021
Packet Pg. 386
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
f. The feasibility of the applicant to alter the project to apply the requirements of this chapter.
3. Any exception must meet the following criteria:
Page 24/27
a. The exception will not increase risk to the public health and welfare, nor be injurious to other
properties in the vicinity and/or downstream, and to the quality of waters of the state; and
b. The exception is the least possible exception that could be granted to comply with the intent of the
minimum requirements.
4. An exception to the requirements shall only be granted to the extent necessary to provide relief from the
economic hardship as determined by the Director, to alleviate the harm or threat of harm to the degree that
compliance with the requirement becomes technically feasible, or to perform the emergency work that the
Director determines is warranted.
5. The Director may require an applicant to provide additional information at the applicant's expense,
including (but not limited to) an engineer's report or analysis.
6. When an exception is granted, the Director may impose new or additional requirements to offset or mitigate
harm or the threat of harm that may be caused by granting the exception, or that would have been
prevented if the exception had not been granted.
B. Adjustments.
1. The Director may approve a request for adjustments to the requirements of this chapter when the Director
finds that:
a. The adjustment provides substantially equivalent environmental protection; and
b. The objectives of safety, function, environmental protection, and facility maintenance are met, based
on sound engineering practices.
During construction, the Director may require, or the applicant may request, that the construction of
drainage control facilities and associated project designs be adjusted if physical conditions are discovered
on the site that are inconsistent with the assumptions on which the approval was based, including (but not
limited to) unexpected soil or water conditions, weather -generated problems, or changes in the design of
the improved areas; and
A request by the applicant for an adjustment shall be submitted to the Director for review and approval
prior to implementation. The request shall be in writing and shall provide facts substantiating the
requirements of subsection (C)(1) of this section, and if made during construction, the factors in subsection
(C)(2) of this section. Any such modifications made during the construction of drainage control facilities
shall be included with the final approved drainage control plan.
C. Appeal.
1. The Director's decision on an application for an exception or adjustment may appeal to the hearing
examiner in accordance with a Type II appeal process in ECDC Chapter 20.06.
2. The applicant shall carry the burden of proof.
3. The decision of the hearing examiner is appealable to superior court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C
RCW. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City to inspect or perform any duty imposed upon the
City by this Title. The City shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. If the
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 387
8.1.d
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 25/27
responsible party fails to respond within seven days from the receipt of notification, the City may order the work
required to be completed or otherwise address the cause of improper access. The obligation for the payment of all
cost that may be incurred or expended by the City in causing such work to be done shall be imposed on the person
holding title to the subject property.
B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity
such as an individual, corporation, or homeowner's association. The maintenance covenant shall address or append
requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance the applicable BMP(s). Maintenance
covenants shall be as specified in City Engineering Division documents or approved by the Director, and recorded
with Snohomish County and on all proper deeds [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of stormwater facilities is essential for the protection of the City's
MS4 and the environment.
A. Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and maintained per
the requirements of Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance
standard, the owner shall develop a standard based on guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered
professional engineer and submit the standards to the Director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance
standard is to determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's
required condition at all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not
a violation of this chapter.
B. Ownership. Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All stormwater facilities
that serve private property are private, unless an agreement between the property owner and the City states
otherwise. Stormwater facilities that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also
are private. The City may offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private storm
drainage facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The City shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the Stormwater Utility.
D. Maintenance and Inspection of Permanent Facilities. All privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls
shall be maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in the SWMMWW. The Owner
shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts, and monitoring results. The records shall
catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was taken, how it was done, and any problems
encountered or follow-up actions required. The records shall be made available to the City upon request. The Owner
shall maintain a copy of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make
reference to such document in real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real
property served by the privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to
maintain such facilities or controls.
E. City Inspection of private stormwater facilities. The City shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including low impact development stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the City may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by the a state or Federal program provided that the
City makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering
and presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the Director shall have
recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including but not limited to, obtaining an administrative
warrant for entry.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 388
Edmonds Page 26/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
G. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately -owned stormwater facility
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of ECC 7.200 shall apply.
H. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the City, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility.
If a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on
a recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility
shall rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or
finally, with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located.
I. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC,
guidelines for disposal of waste materials from storm water maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the
Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
A. General enforcement action shall be in accordance with this chapter whenever a person has violated any
provision of this chapter. The choice of enforcement action is at the discretion of the City.
B. Civil Penalties Adopted. ECDC Chapter 20.110 enforcement procedures are herein adopted in full, as modified in
this chapter, with the proviso that repeat offenders or violations deemed an immediate public hazard shall be subject
to compliance and appeal timelines as deemed appropriate by the Director based on the specific nature of the
violation.
C. Maintenance Orders. The Director shall have the authority to issue to an owner or person an order to maintain or
repair a component of a stormwater facility or BMP to bring it into compliance with this chapter, the SWMMWW,
the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, and the Edmonds Community Development Code. The order shall include:
1. A description of the specific nature, extent and time of the violation and the damage or potential damage
that reasonably might occur;
2. A notice that the violation or the potential violation cease and desist and, in appropriate cases, the specific
corrective actions to be taken; and
3. A reasonable time to comply, depending on the circumstances.
D. Civil Penalty. A person who fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter, who fails to conform to an
approval or order issued, who undertakes development without first obtaining approval, or who fails to comply with
a stop work order issued under these regulations shall be subject to a civil penalty levied in accordance with the
provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.110; provided, however, that the appeal process shall commence with a notice of
violation as provided in ECDC 20.110.040.13.
1. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter
20.110; provided, however, that in addition to the penalties set forth in that chapter, the hearing examiner
is authorized to levy a penalty of up to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per occurrence based upon an
assessment of the following factors. Where such factors are present, the hearing examiner is authorized to
levy such penalty after taking into consideration the full impact of the violation and any mitigating
circumstances (see subsection (2) below):
a. The violation created a risk to public health and the significance of the risk.
b. The violation damaged the environment and the significance of the damage.
c. The violation caused damage to public and private property and the significance of such damage.
d. A history of similar violations, if any.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 389
8.1.d
Edmonds Page 27/27
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
e. The economic benefit of the violations, if any, to the person or entity responsible for the violations.
2. Mitigating circumstances which may be used to offset or reduce the time resulting from the application of
the preceding factors are limited to:
a. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and no history of similar violations.
b. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and a history of one or two similar violations
(lesser reduction).
c. A "voluntary compliance agreement" is defined as a legally binding agreement entered into between
the City and the alleged violators, by which the violator(s) acknowledge the existence of the violation,
waive all appeal rights, and agree to and do pay a fine in an amount stipulated to between the violator
and the City.
If the violation(s) are not corrected as ordered, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into
within that time period and no appeal is filed, the penalty for the next 15-day period shall be 150 percent of
the initial penalties, and the penalties for the next 15-day period shall be 200 percent of the initial penalties.
The intent of this subsection is to increase penalties beyond the maximum penalties stated as an additional
means to achieve timely compliance.
Unless otherwise provided in a voluntary compliance agreement, civil penalties shall be paid within 30
days of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. Payment of the civil penalties
assessed under this chapter does not relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or
her duty to correct the violation or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued
pursuant to this chapter.
The City may suspend immediate payment of civil penalties if the person responsible for a code violation
has entered into a voluntary compliance agreement. Penalties shall begin to accrue again pursuant to the
terms of the voluntary compliance agreement if any necessary permits applied for are denied, canceled or
not pursued, if corrective action identified in the voluntary compliance agreement is not completed as
specified, or if the property is allowed to return to a condition similar to that condition which gave rise to
the voluntary compliance agreement; provided, however, that additional penalties shall not be imposed
until additional notice and opportunity for hearing have been provided in accordance with ECDC Chapter
20.110.
Civil penalties assessed create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a code
violation.
E. The determination of the hearing examiner issued in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110 shall be appealable
to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW.
F. The remedies provided for in this section shall not be exclusive. The City may also use other civil and
administrative remedies available to it, including but not limited to the remedies provided in ECDC Title 19 and the
state building and dangerous buildings codes.
Version: September Q 201cJuly 2021
Packet Pg. 390
8.1.e
ADDENDUM TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18.30
(EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM)
J
oAp
�g�O
r1r.1 010 Dial wra-12 ll
2021
Packet Pg. 391
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
W
�L
d
ci
IL
m
c
m
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 392
ii NE 2017-OCTOBER 2021
8.1.e
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
CONTENTS
1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1
2 How to Use this Addendum......................................................................................................3
2.1
SWMMWW Volume I......................................................................................................3
2.2
SWMMWW Volume II.....................................................................................................4
2.3
SWMMWW Volume III....................................................................................................4
2.4
SWMMWW Volume IV.................................................................................................54
2.5
SWMMWW Volume V.....................................................................................................5
2.6
Addendum Content Not Covered in the SWMMWW......................................................5
3 Applicability of the Minimum Requirements...........................................................................7
3.1
Thresholds and Applicability............................................................................................9
3.1.1 Additional Requirements for Road -Related Projects.........................................9
3.1.2 New Connections to the City's MS4..................................................................9
3.1.3 Comparisons to the SWMMWW.....................................................................10
4 Project Basin Location and Applicable Requirements.......................................................1344
4.1
Determining Downstream Receiving System(s).........................................................1344
4.2
Other Considerations...................................................................................................1444
5 Project Minimum Requirements.........................................................................................154-3-
5.1
Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans ......................
154-3-
5.2
Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan 154-3-
5.3
Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution .....................................
154-3-
5.4
Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and
Outfalls........................................................................................................................164-4
5.5
Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -Site Stormwater Management ............................174-5
5.6
Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment.....................................................194-7
5.6.1 Edmonds -Specific Oil and Floatables Control.............................................204-9
5.7
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control............................................................204-8
5.8
Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetland Protection...................................................214-8
5.9
Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance.....................................214}
6 Additional Requirements....................................................................................................2324
6.1
Protection of LID Facilities During Construction.......................................................
23-24
6.1.1 General Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs Applicable to LID...............23-24
6.1.2 Additional Construction Techniques for LID BMPs....................................2422
edmondsstormwateraddendum 2022 redlines.docx _ TABLE OF CONTENTS
Packet Pg. 393
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.e
11 INE'=7OCTOBER 2021
6.1.3 BMP-Specific Construction Techniques......................................................2725
6.2 Off -Site Analyses and Documentation........................................................................302-9
6.2.1 Category 1 Projects.......................................................................................302-9
6.2.2 Category 2 Projects.......................................................................................302-8.
6.3 Design Requirements for Detention Vaults and Pipes................................................32-38
6.3.1 Sizing & Design............................................................................................33-4
6.4 Underground Injection Controls..................................................................................34-4
7 Submittal Requirements......................................................................................................35-3-3
7.1 Category 1 Stormwater Site Plans...............................................................................35-34
7.2 Category 2 Stormwater Site Plans...............................................................................35-34
APPENDICES
Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
Appendix B — Methods for Determining Design Infiltration Rates
Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure Elements
Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1. Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for Development.................................8
Figure 7.1. Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components . ................................... 35-4
Figure 7.2. Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components . ................................... 36-3-2
H TABLE OF CONTENTS zz* edmondsstormwateraddendum 2022 redlines.docx'° ^°°°^ ^^^ — "" -" a^cx
Packet Pg. 394
8.1.e
1 INTRODUCTION
This Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (Addendum) provides direction for implementing the City of
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.30, Stormwater Management. The City of
Edmonds is required to regulate stormwater discharges to the municipal stormwater system and to waters
of the state, in compliance with the Western Washington Phase II National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit (the Permit). Under the Permit, the City must
establish and apply the minimum requirements specified in the Permit and provide design guidance for
stormwater quality and quantity control for development projects in Edmonds. Through ECDC
Chapter 18.30 and this Addendum, the City is complying with federal requirements under the Clean Water
Act and the Permit.
This Addendum is organized into 7 chapters, briefly summarized below:
• Chapter 2 — How to Use this Addendum includes information on how to use the Addendum in
conjunction with the ECDC and Ecology's 20142019 Stormwater Management Manual for
Western Washington (SWMMWW), and to clarify for users where the ECDC, SWMMWW, or
Addendum apply.
• Chapter 3 — Applicability of the Minimum Requirements includes details on the thresholds
that determine the applicability of the minimum requirements to different projects. This
information is based on SWMMWW Volume I, Section 2:43.3, but has been updated to reflect
the specific requirements of ECDC 18.30. Chapter 3 also includes a brief summary of how
ECDC 18.30.060 compares to the SWMMWW (regarding applicability of the minimum
requirements).
• Chapter 4 —Project Basin Locations and Applicable Requirements describes downstream
receiving waterbodies and/or drainage systems in the city, which will affect how the minimum
requirements apply to a given project (primarily Minimum Requirements No. 5, No. 6, and
No. 7). Chapter 4 also includes a brief discussion of the unique soil and topographical conditions
in the City of Edmonds.
• Chapter 5 —Project Minimum Requirements highlights the primary differences between the
minimum requirements presented in the SWMMWW and those in the ECDC and provides
additional details and guidance to help projects comply with each minimum requirement.
• Chapter 6 — Additional Requirements includes additional information on City -specific
requirements that are not fully described in the SWMMWW or ECDC. Specific topics include:
1. Additional requirements pertaining to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
(SWPPPs) Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management
Practices (BMPs)
2. Details on the off -site analyses and documentation required to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 4, Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
1. INTRODUCTION 1
Packet Pg. 395
8.1.e
3. Design requirements for detention vaults and pipes when used to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5
4. Information on Underground Injection Controls (UICs)
• Chapter 7 — Submittal Requirements summarizes the process and requirements for preparing
project submittals that meet the requirements of the SWMMWW, the ECDC, and this Addendum
The appendices included in this Addendum provide additional background information and requirements
related to stormwater management in the city. (Also note that there are several additional pertinent
appendices within the SWMMWW that are adopted by reference.) The following City -specific
appendices are included in this Addendum:
• Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
• Appendix B — Methods for Determining BMP Design Infiltration Rates
• Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure Elements
o Checklist 1 — Category 1 Stormwater Site Plans
o Checklist 2 — Category 2 Stormwater Site Plans
o Checklist 3 — Construction SWPPP Drawings and Report
o Checklist 4 — Methods for Determining Infiltration Rates
o Checklist 5 — Field and Design Procedures for Bioretention, Permeable Pavement, Rain
Gardens, and Downspout Infiltration Systems
o Checklist 6 — Procedures for Infiltration Trenches and Basins
• Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs
o Checklist 7 —
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth
o Checklist 8 —
Sheet Flow Dispersion
o Checklist 9 —
Concentrated Flow Dispersion
o Checklist 10
— Bioretention Cells, Swales, and Planter Boxes
o Checklist 11
— Permeable Paving
o Checklist 12
— Rain Gardens
o Checklist 13
— Downspout Infiltration
o Checklist 14
— Downspout Dispersion
o Checklist 15
— Perforated Stub -out Connections
2 1. INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 396
8.1.e
2 HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM
Review ECDC Chapter 18.30.030 and 18.30.040 to determine if the City's Stormwater Code and this
Addendum apply to your project. Review the definitions section of ECDC Chapter 18.30.10 (and if
necessary the Glossary in SWMMWW Volume I, Appendix G for clarification on terminology used in
ECDC Chapter 18.30 and this Addendum.
As per ECDC Chapter 18.30.60, the stormwater management requirements in the City of Edmonds —
including but not limited to thresholds, definitions, minimum requirements, adjustment and variance
criteria, and exceptions to these requirements — shall be governed by the 20142019 SWMMWW, with
additional requirements and modifications as outlined in the provisions of ECDC Chapter 18.30 and this
Addendum. Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30 (18.30.060 in particular) and this Addendum to
identify how the City's requirements and the requirements of the SWMMWW apply to a given project. In
the event of inconsistencies between the various provisions, the more stringent provisions shall apply,
unless otherwise approved by the City. Where requirements in this Addendum are also covered in any
other law, ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation of any kind (i.e., outside of ECDC Chapter 18.30), the
more restrictive requirement shall govern, unless otherwise approved by the City.
This Addendum includes information to supplement or elaborate on the guidelines and requirements
outlined in ECDC Chapter 18.30 and the SWMMWW. To highlight for Addendum users where the
ECDC, SWMMWW, or Addendum apply, the following sections outline the general applicability of each
document, summarized according to the organization of the SWMMWW. Note however that the
SWMMWW is not always written in a manner that is suitable as a municipal regulatory tool, therefore
there are known overlaps among the ECDC, SWMMWW, and Addendum. As such, this section is only
intended to be a guide, not a definitive resource on SWMMWW applicability. When questions or
potential inconsistencies arise, project proponents should contact the City for clarification and
interpretation.
2.1 SWMMWW VOLUME I
Chapter 1 — Introduction : Adopted in its entirety.
• Chapter 2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits. Requirements, and Programs: Adopted in its
entire .
Chapter 2-3 —Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment_- Users should
refer first to ECDC Chapter 18.30.60 and this Addendum. Note that some portions of
ECDC 18.30.60 refer back to the SWMMWW as well as specific sections of this Addendum.
o In addition, note dia4 for all minimum requirements that require flow modeling, unless
otherwise specified, all continuous modeling shall be performed using the "Puget East 36"
precipitation time series, consisting of a 158-year precipitation and evaporation time series
that are representative of the climatic conditions in the City of Edmonds. This time series is
available in WWHM241-2 (select "Use WS-DOT data") and MGSFlood (Extended
Timeseries menu).
2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM 3
Packet Pg. 397
8.1.e
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 includes an additional "retro-fit" specific to Minimum Requirement
#5: see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i.
Chapter- 3 apply to pr-oj eets in Edmonds, btA Chaptef 7 of this AddeRdufli
has been er-eated
Plans, Gity
as well as additional speeifie stibmittal •
• Chapter 4 —
UIC Program: Adopted in its entirety. All UICs within Edmonds shall
comply with the applicable requirements of this section.
• Appendices —Use Appendix G for the SWMMWW only and refer to ECDC Chapter 18.30.10 for
ECDC definitions.
2.2 SWMMWW VOLUME II
• SWMMWW Volume II is adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, this Addendum includes supplemental information to support compliance with
SWMMWW Minimum Requirement No. 2, new Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact
Development BMPs. See Chapter 6.
2.3 SWMMWW VOLUME III
.Chapter 1 -Choosing your BMPs: Chapter
adopted in its entirety.
o The infeasibility criteria typically are included within the specific BMP descriptions in the
SWMMWW, but are summarized in Appendix A for clarity and ease of use. Appendix A also
includes additional BMP infeasibility criteria that are specific to the City of Edmonds, and
not necessarily included in the 2014 SWMMWW.
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 adds detention to the list of BMPs to be considered under minimum
requirement #5; see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.
•in addition, note that Chapter- 6 of this Addendum ineludes infefma4iea to supplement the
andChapter 2 — Modelling Your BMPs: Chapter adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, Checklist 8 thru 15 of this Addendum include checklists for desi rg iing BMPs.
• Chapter 3 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans: Refer first to Chapter 7 of this Addendum, and
associated Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3. The requirements of SWMMWW Volume III,
Chapter 3 apply to projects in Edmonds, but Chapter 7 of this Addendum has been created to
4 2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM
Packet Pg. 398
8.1.e
facilitate compliance with both the SWMMWW requirements for preparation of Stormwater Site
Plans, as well as additional City -specific submittal requirements.
2.4 SWMMWW VOLUME IV
• SWMMWW Volume IV is adopted in its entirety.
2.5 SWMMWW VOLUME V
• SWMMWW Volume V is adopted in its entirety.
o In addition, this Addendum includes supplemental information to support determination of
On -Site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility. Specifically, Appendix A of this
Addendum summarizes infeasibility criteria that apply to each BMP (to be used in complying
with Minimum Requirement No. 5). The infeasibility criteria typically are included within the
specific BMP descriptions in the SWMMWW, but are summarized in Appendix A for clarity
and ease of use. Appendix A also includes additional BMP infeasibility criteria that are
specific to the City of Edmonds, and not necessarily included in the 20142019
SWMMWW. Where there are differences between the SWMMWW and Appendix A, the
requirements in Appendix A shall apply unless otherwise approved by the City.
o In addition, this Addendum includes design requirements for detention tanks and vaults to
meet the Edmonds -specific application of a detention as a BMP for Minimum Requirement
#5 in Section 6.3.
o In addition, ECDC 18.30 includes a "retrofit" provision under Minimum Requirement #5
which requires mitigating a portion of existingunmitigated nmitigated hard surfaces to remain on a
project site; see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.i
2.6 ADDENDUM CONTENT NOT COVERED IN THE
• Note that in addition to the items included in Sections 2.1 through 2.5 above, this Addendum
includes extensive information that is unique to the City and not tied to a specific SWMMWW
volume or issue. Therefore, in addition to the notes above, users must review all of this
Addendum and ECDC 18.30 for applicable requirements. This includes the Appendices and
checklists included in this Addendum (particularly the BMP design checklists), which contain
City -specific design, procedural, and submittal requirements that may not be reflected in the
SWMMWW or ECDC.
• In addition, as noted in Section 2.1 above, unless otherwise specified, all continuous modeling
shall be performed using the "Puget East 36" precipitation time series, consisting of a 158-year
precipitation and evaporation time series that are representative of the climatic conditions in the
City of Edmonds. This time series is available in WWHM2412 (select "Use WS-DOT data") and
MGSFlood (Extended Timeseries menu).
2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM 5
Packet Pg. 399
8.1.e
• The use of corrugated metal pipe within Edmonds is prohibit on both private and public
properties storm drain conveyance and /or BMPs (i.e. detention tanks).
6 2. HOW TO USE THIS ADDENDUM
Packet Pg. 400
8.1.e
3 APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS
This chapter is based on SWMMWW Volume I, Section 2.4, however the content below has been
updated to reflect the specific requirements of ECDC 18.30. Project proponents must review
ECDC 18.30 in detail. The following provides additional information and direction on the thresholds and
applicability of minimum requirements outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.
Project proponents must be aware that not all of the minimum requirements apply to every development
project. The applicability varies depending on the project type and size. This chapter summarizes
thresholds that determine the applicability of the minimum requirements to different projects. Review
ECDC 18.30.060 and use the flow chart in Figure 3.1 to determine which of the minimum requirements
apply to your project. (The minimum requirements themselves are provided in 18.30.060.D and are
summarized in Chapter 5 of this Addendum).
The thresholds described below and in Figure 3.1 are to be determined at the time of application for a
subdivision, plat, short plat, building permit, or other construction permit. For projects involving only
land disturbing activities, (e.g., clearing or grading), the thresholds apply at the time of application for the
permit allowing or authorizing that activity.
3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 7
Packet Pg. 401
8.1.e
Does the project result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area?
OR
Does the land disturbing activity total 7,000 square feet or greater?
Yes No
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through 5 apply I Minimum Requirement No. 2 applies
Next Question
Does the project add 5,000 square feet or more of new plus replaced hard surfaces?
OR
Convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas?
OR
Convert 2.5 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture?
No
Yes No
Is this a road related project?
All Minimum Requirements
apply to the new and replaced Yes
hard surfaces and converted
vegetation areas.
All Minimum Requirements
apply to the new hard surfaces
and converted vegetation areas.
Yes
Does the project add
5,000 square feet or No
more of new hard
surfaces?
Yes
Do new hard surfaces add 50% or
more to the existing hard surfaces
within the project limits?
No
Figure 3.1. Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for Development.
No additional
requirements.
8 3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 402
8.1.e
3.1 THRESHOLDS AND APPLICABILITY
All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
The following Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5:
• Results in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
• Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
The following Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9:
• Results in 5,000 square feet or more of new plus replaced hard surfaces, or
• Converts 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
• Converts 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
3.1.1 Additional Requirements for Road -Related Projects
For road -related projects, runoff from the new hard surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and
sidewalks) and the converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum requirements if the new hard
surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more. In addition, if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or
more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits, runoff from the
new and replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum
requirements. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the width of the right-of-
way.
3.1.2 New Connections to the City's MS4
When a property owner proposes a new connection to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
(MS4), and the situation either 1) does not exceed the Category 1 or Category 2 thresholds above, or
2) does not involve activity that meets the definition of development, the following applies:
• Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but wish to connect directly or indirectly
to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval.
• For sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of hard surface area to the
City's MS4, the project shall comply with the requirements of this chapter, treating all hard
surfaces to be drained to the City system as new hard surfaces, unless applicant can demonstrate
that the site will discharge in the same manner and quantities prior to the proposed project.
Applicant shall account for natural dispersion and/or infiltration which may be occurring if these
new hard surfaces area currently drain through pervious areas in their analysis.min4ffmm
poses any risk to dowastfeam systems stieh as efesion, flooding, pr-epei4y damage, habita4
damage,,water- "alit), degia 4iea, vvriaerTeWed impaets.
3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 9
Packet Pg. 403
8.1.e
3.1.3 Comparisons to the SWMMWW
Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30 in detail, but the following notes are provided to help
clarify how ECDC 18.30.060 compares to the SWMMWW regarding applicability of the minimum
requirements (see Chapter 5 for additional details on the individual minimum requirements and how they
differ from the SWMMWW):
1. ECDC 18.30 refers to "Category 1" projects and "Category 2" projects. See ECDC 18.30.060 for
complete details, but in general:
O Category 1 project sites result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard
surface area and shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
O Category 2 project sites result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard
surface area and shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
2. ECDC 18.30 does not differentiate between new development and redevelopment.
3. Information regarding which surfaces each minimum requirement applies to (e.g., new hard
surfaces, replaced hard surfaces, or both) is typically discussed under each minimum requirement
as opposed to within the initial applicability section.
4In addition to item No. 3 above, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b includes a retrofit requirement for
projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain existing hard
surfaces that do not drain to an approved stormwater management facility. These projects are
required to provide On -site Stormwater Management BMPs to manage a portion (a minimum of
25 percent) of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after project completion. See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.b for complete details on this requirement.
45. ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 also adds detention as a BMP to be ^er�'�.onsidered for feasibility
under Minimum Requirement #5 in additional to those in SWMMWW, see Section 6.3.
5-.6. As per the SWMMWW, for road -related projects, if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet
or more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within the project limits, runoff
from the new and replaced hard surfaces shall meet all the minimum requirements. Otherwise, the
minimum requirements only apply to the new hard surfaces (if the new hard surfaces total
5,000 square feet or more). Unlike the SWMMWW, non -road -related projects do not have to
assess the valuation of the proposed improvements in order to determine the applicability of the
minimum requirements. In general, once triggered by the applicable project area thresholds (see
below and ECDC 18.30.060), the minimum requirements apply to both new and replaced hard
surfaces.
7ECDC 18.30-.060 and this Addendum also includes requirements for new connections to the
City's MS4, when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the definition of
development. See the previous section of this Addendum for additional information on new
connections.
8. ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum modify the flow modelling basin to be used in modelling, see
Section 2.6.
9. ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum requires use of the phosphorus treatment menu within the Hall's
Creek and Lake Ballinger basins; see Section 5.6.
6 10. Section 5.3, below, prohibits the use of corrugated metal piping (LCMP) within Edmonds.
10 3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 404
8.1.e
a
3. APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 11
Packet Pg. 405
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
W
�L
ci
IL
m
c
m
o:
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 406
8.1.e
4 PROJECT BASIN LOCATION AND
APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
4.1 DETERMINING DOWNSTREAM RECEIVING SYSTEM(S)
Broadly speaking, stormwater runoff in the City of Edmonds either travels west to Puget Sound (via a
creek or piped system) or to the east to Lake Ballinger or Hall Creek, which discharges to Lake Ballinger.
In addition to assessing the new and replaced hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas associated
with a project, the minimum requirements (primarily Minimum Requirements No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7)
can also vary depending on the project's downstream receiving waterbody and/or drainage system. The
specific details of each minimum requirement are outlined in Chapter 5, but in general, projects should
determine what type of system(s) their project site drains to early in the development process: The two
primary systems to be aware of are described below. Note that these systems are not mutually exclusive:
1. Direct Discharge areas: Those site areas that discharge runoff directly to Puget Sound via a
constructed conveyance system (e.g., pipe or ditch) without first entering a creek or other
receiving water. (See Section 2.53.4.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW for the full list of
restrictions that must be met to qualify as a direct discharge.)
2. City of Edmonds Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4): Those site areas that discharge
to the City's MS4 before ultimately discharging to a downstream receiving water (e.g., a creek,
lake, or Puget Sound). See the City's NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit for the complete
MS4 definition, but this generally includes sites that discharge to a dedicated stormwater
conveyance system (including roads with drainage systems, ditches, manmade channels, or storm
drains) owned or operated by the City and that discharge to waters of Washington State
(including creeks, lakes, ponds, wetlands, and Puget Sound).
A map of watersheds in Edmonds is available via the Edmonds GIS Map that can be accessed on the
City's website here: (<www.maps.edmondswa.gov>). (Note that the City's NIS4 is fet ide ti fie r
City's S4+Direct Discharge Basins are those labeled "Puget Sound;" or "Puget Sound Piped_;"ef
"Edmends x; ay." - Edmonds Way is known to have an overflow under certain conditions which creates a
discharge to Edmonds Marsh (not considered man-made drainage course for the purposes of this
exemption), and therefore the Edmonds Way basin shall not be considered a direct discharge basin. An
applicant with site -specific information that is contrary to the basin designations shown in Figure B-1 can
present this information to the Public Works Director (Director) or designee for a possible change in basin
designation. The Director or designee will make a determination on any requests for a site -specific change
in basin designation.
4. PROJECT BASIN TYPE AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS 13
Packet Pg. 407
8.1.e
4.2 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Edmonds is fortunate to be located adjacent to Puget Sound and possess topography that facilitates
desirable views. The underlying soils and relatively steep slopes, however, complicate the application of
stormwater management techniques.
Prior to logging and subsequent development of the Edmonds area, trees and the forest duff layer above
the soil surface (consisting primarily of needles, leaves, branches, bark, and stems in various stages of
decomposition) covered the city. With logging came the elimination of the majority of the tree canopy
and the duff layer, and with it the elimination of the water -holding capacity of the natural land cover. In
the majority of the city, the soils that remain (after forest removal and subsequent development) consist of
till or hard pan, which is much less effective at storing or absorbing rainwater. Although this Addendum
and the SWMMWW place substantial emphasis on the use of infiltration and on -site stormwater
management techniques, the soil regime in the City of Edmonds can make this goal challenging. It is
therefore important that project sites thoroughly investigate and understand their soil conditions (as well
as other site conditions such as slope, groundwater levels, etc.) before proceeding too far with the site
stormwater design. See the submittal checklists in Appendix C (Checklists 1 through 3), BMP
infeasibility criteria in Appendix A, and SWMMWW Chapter- 3-for additional details and requirements.
In addition to challenging soil conditions, approximately 25 percent of the land area in the City of
Edmonds has a slope of 15 percent or greater or is in an Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (the
Meadowdale area in the northernmost portion of the city). Geologic hazards in these areas can be
increased when stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces percolates into the soil. As emphasized in the
submittal checklists in Appendix C (Checklists 1 through 3), BMP infeasibility criteria in Appendix A,
and SWMMWW Chapter 3; consideration of slopes in the project vicinity is a critical component of the
site stormwater design.
44
FVJ
14 4. PROJECT BASIN TYPE AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 408
8.1.e
5 PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
This chapter should be used as a supplement to ECDC 18.30.060.13 and SWMMWW Volume I,
Seetion 3 as it emphasizes the key differences between the minimum requirements outlined in
the SWMMWW and those outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D. Project proponents must still review
ECDC 18.30.060.D in detail, but the following text provides additional information and direction on the
minimum requirements outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D. As noted previously in Chapter 4, once a given
minimum requirement is triggered (per the thresholds in Chapter 3), the specifics of the minimum
requirement may vary depending on the project downstream receiving waterbody and/or drainage system.
5.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 1 - PREPARATION OF
STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans are required for all projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 1, as outlined in
Chapter 3 and ECDC 18.30.060.C. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 3
of Volume 4-III of the SWMMWW. However, because Chapter 3 of the SWMMWW includes extensive
technical requirements, but does not explicitly specify how those requirements shall be consistently
documented, submitted, and/or reviewed for a typical development project, the City of Edmonds has
developed project checklists to facilitate compliance with this minimum requirement (and thus project
submittal and review). Those checklists are introduced in Chapter 7 and provided in Appendix C,
Checklists 1 through 3.
5.2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 2 - CONSTRUCTION
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.2. In addition, note that ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d.i points to the SWMMWW
Chapter -23, Section 2-.5--.23.4.2 for details on the requirements for Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plans (SWPPPs), including the 13 Elements that must be reflected in the Construction
SWPPP. See Chapter 6 for additional requirements pertaining to Construction SWPPP Element No. 13 —
Protect Low Impact Development BMPs, which are not provided in the SWMMWW.
5.3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 3 - SOURCE CONTROL
OF POLLUTION
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.3 and SWMMWW Volume IV. Note that all single-family residential projects
shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs from SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for
Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 15
Packet Pg. 409
8.1.e
Corrugated metal pipe (CMP) has been found to be a routine failure problem in Edmonds and a potential
source of additional sediment in the Citysystem. For this reason, CMP pipe is not permitted within
Edmonds on either public or private property or both conveyance storm pipe and for detention tanks.
5.4 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 4 - PRESERVATION OF
NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.4 and the content presented below. Although this minimum requirement is based
on Minimum Requirement No. 4 in SWMMWW Volume I, Section 1-543.4.4, there are enough
differences between the City's requirements and those in the SWMMWW that project proponents should
not refer to the SWMMWW for Minimum Requirement No. 4. Only ECDC 18.30.060.D.3 and the
following shall be required. To demonstrate compliance with this minimum requirement, all projects shall
submit as part of their Stormwater Site Plan an off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts
of stormwater discharges. (See the end of this section, and Chapter 6, for details on the requirements for
analysis and documentation.)
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the
natural location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the
project site must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters or down gradient
properties. The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the
ultimate outfall location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require
energy dissipation. (Designs for outfall systems to protect against adverse impacts from concentrated
runoff are included in SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 41.)
In addition, existing upstream flows must be accommodated without causing erosion or flooding impacts.
Upstream drainage means drainage from adjacent property that enters the proposed project site (other than
a defined natural channel). Upstream flows shall not be routed through the project's conveyance,
treatment, or retention/detention systems, unless those systems are sized to control those flows. Upstream
flows that are collected and routed through or around the site in a separate conveyance shall be dispersed
at the downgradient property line, if feasible, or discharged at a project outfall (or outfalls) in a manner
that does not violate the criteria below or cause the capacity of a conveyance system to be exceeded.
Where no conveyance system exists at the adjacent downgradient property line and the discharge was
previously unconcentrated flow or significantly lower concentrated flow, measures must be taken to
prevent downgradient impacts. Drainage easements from downstream property owners may be needed
and should be obtained prior to approval of engineering plans.
For Category 2 projects only — where no conveyance system exists at the adjacent downstream property
line and the natural (existing) discharge is unconcentrated, any runoff concentrated by the proposed
project, including upstream drainage, must be discharged as follows:
1. If the 100-year peak discharge is less than or equal to 0.2 cfs (0.3 cfs using 15-minute time steps)
under existing conditions and will remain less than or equal to 0.2 cfs under developed
conditions, then the concentrated runoff may be discharged onto a rock pad or to any other
system that serves to disperse flows.
2. If the 100-year peak discharge is between 0.2 and 0.5 cfs (or 0.75 cfs using 15-minute time steps)
under existing conditions and will remain in that range under developed conditions, then the
16 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 410
8.1.e
concentrated runoff may be discharged through a dispersal trench or other dispersal system,
provided the applicant can demonstrate that there will be no significant adverse impact to
downhill properties or drainage systems.
3. If the 100-year peak discharge is greater than 0.5 cfs for either existing or developed conditions,
or if a significant adverse impact to downgradient properties or drainage systems is likely, then a
conveyance system shall be provided to convey the concentrated runoff across the downstream
properties to an acceptable discharge point (i.e., an enclosed drainage system or open drainage
feature where concentrated runoff can be discharged without significant adverse impact).
To demonstrate compliance with this minimum requirement, all projects shall submit as part of their
Stormwater Site Plan an off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges. Off -site analyses shall assess upstream and downstream conditions, including the conveyance
capacity and erosion potential in the downstream system. If a problem is found, mitigation is required to
prevent worsening of that problem or to mitigate an existing flooding or erosion problem. The off -site
analysis shall include, at a minimum, a qualitative analysis of each upstream drainage system entering a
site, and each downstream drainage system leaving a site. A quantitative analysis may be required for any
project deemed to need additional downstream information or where the project proponent or the City
determines that a quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the
conveyance system (e.g., where there is evidence of a risk to downstream systems such as erosion,
flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other related impacts). See
Chapter 6 for additional details on off -site analyses and documentation.
5.5 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 5 - ON -SITE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
The City has made several additions and changes to the contents of Minimum Requirement No. 5 relative
to the SWMMWW. Project proponents must review ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 in detail to ensure all City -
specific requirements are addressed. This section of the Addendum provides a summary of the City -
specific elements of Minimum Requirement No. 5.
In addition, this Addendum includes several tools to support implementation of Minimum Requirement
No. 5 and related requirements. These tools include:
A summary of infeasibility criteria for all On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs (see
Appendix A). These infeasibility criteria must be considered when evaluating the feasibility of
On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs as part of List No. 1 or List No. 2. The infeasibility
criteria are included within the specific BMP descriptions in the SWMMWW, but are
summarized in Appendix A for clarity. Appendix A also includes additional BMP infeasibility
criteria that are specific to the City of Edmonds, and not necessarily included in the 240442019
SWMMWW.
2. A summary of acceptable methods for determining BMP design infiltration rates (see
Appendix B; and Appendix C, Checklist 4). Initial site infiltration rates may be determined either
using field testing procedures, or the Soil Grain Size Analysis Method. These methods are
described in detail in Appendix B.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 17
Packet Pg. 411
8.1.e
A summary of site investigation and field and design procedures required for several of the On -
Site Stormwater Management BMPs as well as for infiltration basins and trenches (see
Appendix C, Checklists 5 and 6). The field and design procedures required to design and
implement On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs can be considerable, and include issues such
as determining infiltration rates, determining depth to groundwater or other impermeable layers,
soils reporting requirements, etc.
4. Submittal checklists for Category 1 and Category 2 projects, including notes on project site, soil,
and BMP design information that must be documented and submitted to the City to meet the City
of Edmonds and SWMMWW requirements related to Minimum Requirement No. 5 (and other
minimum requirements. See Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3.
5. Design checklists for most of the On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs in List No. 1 and List
No. 2 (see Appendix D).
The applicability of Minimum Requirement No. 5 depends on the project type, project location, and the
existing and proposed surfaces at the project site. See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5 for details, but in summary:
Projects that drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain existing hard surfaces
that do not drain to an approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -Site
Stormwater Management BMPs to manage a minimum of 25 percent of those existing hard
surfaces that will remain after the project. The intent is to bring a portion of any existing,
unmanaged surfaces up to current standards. If the 25 percent minimum is met, projects are not
required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for these existing surfaces
(as per the subsequent project scenarios).
2. Similar to the SWMMWW, Category 1 project sites (project sites subject to Minimum
Requirements No. 1 through No. 5) that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 shall
either use On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No. 1 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d)
for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed, or demonstrate compliance with the
LID Performance Standard (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.c). Note that in the City of Edmonds, List
No. 1 includes detention vaults or pipes as the final BMP option for roofs and other hard surfaces.
See Chapter 6 for associated design requirements for detention vaults and pipes, including
simplified sizing methods for meeting Minimum Requirement No. 5. (Note also that if the project
is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 7 (per
ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault or pipe is not required to be installed to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5.)
Categor,2project sites (project sites subject to Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9) are
subject to similar requirements as Category 1 projects, but must use List No. 2 instead of List
No. 1 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e).
4. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the City's MS4 (in accordance with the
restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound presented in Section 2.5.7 of Volume I
of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID Performance Standard, and only have to
evaluate a subset of the BMPs in List No. 1 or List No. 2. in addition,
Edmonds Way Basi- (see the Edmonds GIS Map available on the City's website) n:mst
demenstfate that the pr-qjeet's -post development 10 , and 100 year- r-eetifFeRee ifltel=val POWs W4
not exeeed 0.25 and 0.45 eubie feet per- seeend per- aer-e of impen4ous sur-faee area, r-espeetiv4y-.
5. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to either:
18 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 412
8.1.e
o Discharge to the downstream private property (with approval)
o Discharge runoff to an on -site system from List No. 1 (see in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d).
■ Sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their buffers are not
required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility. However, a
geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical engineer is required.
■ For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their buffers,
projects must meet applicable Category 1 or Category 2 project requirements for
Minimum Requirement No. 5 (see ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii).
o Project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's MS4, with prior approval.
a,,wast e ri, analysis will be .o ,,; oa ; in such cases, projects shall meet all provisions of
ECDC 18.30 as they would drain to the MS4 in post project conditions.
6. Finally, the following guidance shall be used to help clarify the requirements in the SWMMWW
specific to List No. 1 and No. 2. Where the SWMMWW and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d/e states that
"for each surface, consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first
BMP that is considered feasible. No other On -Site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary
for that surface" the following clarifications are provided:
o The goal of List No. 1 and List No. 2 is to manage 100 percent of each surface. If a project
cannot manage 100 percent of a given surface with the first feasible BMP, a second BMP
may be required to manage the remaining unmanaged area (depending on the size of the
unmanaged area and the site -specific constraints). For example, where a roof surface drains to
multiple downspouts around the perimeter of the structure, it is generally insufficient to only
manage runoff that drains to a single downspout and to leave the remaining downspouts
unmanaged (i.e., due to infeasibility considerations).
7. For BMPs without specific sizing criteria in this Addendum, single family residential projects
under 2,000 SF of new plus replaced hard surfaces only, may use the simplified sizing per the
included checklist for each BMP or per Volume V of SWMMWW to satisfy Minimum
Requirement #5. However, such sizing methodology shall be assumed to generate an overflow
and a piped or subsurface overflow connection is required for such BMPs unless otherwise
waived by the City.
5.6 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 6 - RUNOFF
TREATMENT
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.6 for thresholds and core requirements. See the SWMMWW for additional
information on complying with this minimum requirement. In particular, the following sections should be
reviewed:
• Volume I, Section2-.-S-.63.4.6 for details on treatment facility sizing
• Volume I, Chapter 4 and Volume V, Chapters 2 and 3 for general BMP selection. Note also that
phosphorus treatment is required for projects that drain to Hall Creek or Lake Ballinger.
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 19
Packet Pg. 413
8.1.e
0 Volume V for design and maintenance requirements.
5.6.1 Edmonds -Specific Oil and Floatables Control
In addition to the oil control requirements in the SWMMWW, all projects in the City of Edmonds not
zoned as single-family residential that collect runoff from five or more parking spaces shall install
floatable controls in catch basins (if another approved floatable control system is not employed).
5.7 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 7 — FLOW CONTROL
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.7 for thresholds and core requirements. See the SWMMWW for additional
information on complying with this minimum requirement (in particular, Volume I, Section 1-5-.73.4.7).
Note that flow control in accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that
discharge directly to, or indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (other minimum requirements
still apply, including Minimum Requirement No. 6, as well as Minimum Requirement No. 5 and the
Edmonds Way direct discharge requirements). See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 2-.5-.73.4.7 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
In addition, the following information may be useful in determining the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 7, specifically per the 100-year flow frequency threshold outlined in
ECDC 18.30.060.D.7.b.iii:
Calculations to determine whether a project exceeds the 0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs), using a 1-hour
time step (or 0.15 cfs using a 15-minute time step) increase in the 100-year recurrence interval flow must
be performed individually for each project using an approved continuous simulation runoff model. The
calculation will compare runoff in the post development site to the pre -development land cover. Pre -
development, for this activity only, is the lower runoff of the pre project condition, or the site on July 6,
1977 (the effective date of the City's first drainage control ordinance). The unique site, soil, precipitation,
and other project -specific factors will ultimately determine whether this threshold is exceeded.
Nonetheless, the following general guidelines (based on hypothetical site designs) may be used to help
identify the likelihood of this threshold being exceeded. The following land use changes are likely to
exceed this threshold under certain conditions:
• Converting approximately 5,000 square feet of forest to hard surface
• Converting approximately 5,000 square feet of pasture to hard surface
• Converting approximately 0.25 acres of forest to landscape surface
• Converting approximately 1.25 acres of forest to pasture surfaces (in till soil conditions)
20 5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 414
8.1.e
5.8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 8 - WETLAND
PROTECTION
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.8 and SWMMWW Volume I, Section ''�3.4.8. See also SWMMWW
Volume I, Appendix I-D-C .
5.9 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NO. 9 - OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE
See ECDC 18.30.060.D.9. See also the submittal checklists provided in Appendix C, Checklists 1 through
3 (also referenced previously as part of Minimum Requirements No. 1 and No. 5) for notes about
submittal requirements related to the required operation and maintenance manual.
!,
I
5. PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 21
Packet Pg. 415
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
�L
ci
IL
m
c
m
o:
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 416
8.1.e
6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
This chapter includes additional requirements that are either not included in the SWMMWW, or that are
supplemental to the information provided in the SWMMWW. Specifically, this chapter addresses:
1. Additional requirements pertaining to Construction SWPPP Element No. 13 — Protect Low
Impact Development BMPs (required in the SWMMWW, bttt not outlined in this level of detail)
2. Details on the off -site analyses and documentation required to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 4, Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls (City of Edmonds
specific).
3. Design requirements for detention vaults and pipes when used to meet Minimum Requirement
No. 5.
4. Information on Underground Injection Controls (UICs).
6.1 PROTECTION OF LID FACILITIES DURING
CONSTRUCTION
To ensure that LID stormwater facilities and BMPs will be fully functional after construction, it is
important to protect these BMPs during construction activities. Protecting native soil and vegetation,
minimizing soil compaction, and retaining the hydrologic function of LID BMPs during the site
preparation and construction phases are some of the most important practices during the development
process.
The purpose of this section is to provide designers, builders, and inspectors with guidance and tools for
meeting Minimum Requirement No. 2, Element No. 13 — Protect Low Impact Development BMPs. This
section does not provide guidance on construction or design of LID BMPs (see SWMMWW Volume III
and Volume V), or cover all Construction SWPPP practices (see SWMMWW Volume II), but rather
focuses on how to most efficiently reduce impacts on LID BMPs specifically during construction. The
practices specified in this section must be applied to protect LID BMPs, unless the given practice
does not apply to the project site conditions or activities.
6.1.1 General Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs
Applicable to LID
Overall Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirements are specified in
Chapter 5, Minimum Requirement No. 2 and SWMMWW Volume II. In general, Construction SWPPP
BMPs limit the impact of site disturbance, erosion, and sediment deposition during construction. Some
Construction SWPPP BMPs focus on providing a physical barrier or deterrent to help minimize
construction -related site disturbance and/or erosion, while other Construction SWPPP BMPs help protect
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 23
Packet Pg. 417
8.1.e
the site from concentrated (i.e., erosive) flows. General Construction SWPPP BMPs and their application
for protection of LID BMPs in particular are summarized below. These BMPs must be considered for
projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2 that are proposing to construct LID BMPs.
Construction SWPPP BMP
Application
BMP C103: High Visibility Fence
Use fencing to limit clearing; prevent disturbance of sensitive areas, their
buffers, and other areas; limit construction traffic; and protect areas
where marking with flagging may not provide adequate protection
BMP C200: Interceptor Dike and Swale
Use an interceptor dike and/or swale to intercept the runoff from
unprotected areas and direct it to areas where erosion can be controlled
BMP C201: Grass -Lined Channels
Use grass lined channels where concentrated runoff may cause erosion
and flooding of the site
BMP C207: Check Dams
Use check dams in swales or ditches to reduce the velocity and dissipate
concentrated flow
BMP C208: Triangular Silt Dike (TSD)
Use triangular silt dikes as check dams, for perimeter protection,
(Geotextile-Encased Check Dam)
temporary soil stockpile protection, drop inlet protection, or as a
temporary interceptor dike
BMP C231: Brush Barrier
Use brush barriers to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
coarse sediment from overland flow
BMP C233: Silt Fence
Use silt fences to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
sediment from overland flow
BMP C234: Vegetated Strip
Use vegetated strips to decrease flow velocities and reduce transport of
sediment from overland flow
6.1.2 Additional Construction Techniques for LID BMPs
In addition to the general Construction SWPPP BMPs presented in Section 6.1.1, this section outlines
specific construction -phase techniques to protect LID BMPs. LID BMP protection is still a somewhat
new and evolving practice, therefore the specific LID BMP protection measures outlined below are not
explicitly called out in the SWMMWW. Rather, the techniques presented in this section supplement the
Construction SWPPP BMPs presented above, and those presented in the SWMMWW Volume II. (Note
these techniques can be applied to any site, not just those incorporating LID, but these techniques are
particularly important for LID BMP protection.)
Construction Site Planning and Sequencing
Construction site planning and sequencing is a procedural BMP that is critical to successful installation
and long-term operation of LID BMPs. Proper site planning and construction sequencing will minimize
the impact of construction on permanent stormwater facilities by reducing the potential for soil erosion
and compaction. Site planning and sequencing techniques to be used as practicable for protection of LID
BMPs include:
24 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 418
8.1.e
Construction Site Planning and
Sequencing Requirements
Construction Site Planning and Sequencing Techniques
Limit clearing and grading activities
• Keep grading to a minimum by incorporating natural
topographic depressions into the development.
• Shape final lot grades and topographic features early (i.e., at
the site development stage) where feasible.
• Limit the amount of cut and fill in areas with permeable soils.
• Limit clearing to road, utility, building pad, lawn areas, and the
minimum amount of extra land necessary to maneuver
machinery (e.g., a 10-foot perimeter around a building).
Limit construction activity in areas
• Clearly document —and plan to meet and walk through the
designated for LID
site with equipment operators prior to construction —to clarify
construction boundaries, limits of disturbance, and
construction activities in the vicinity of LID BMPs.
• General/primary contractor must inform other sub -contractors
of applicable LID BMP protection requirements. This is
particularly important when working around permeable
pavement.
Limit clearing and grading during heavy
• Time construction activities to start during the summer (lowest
rainfall seasons
precipitation) and end in the fall (when conditions are
favorable for the establishment of vegetation), if feasible.
Minimize the amount and time that graded
• Complete construction and erosion control activities in one
areas are left exposed
section of the site before beginning activity in another section.
Utilize permeable and nutrient rich soils
• Preserve any portion of the site with permeable soils to
promote infiltration of stormwater runoff.
• Leave areas of rich topsoil in place, or if excavated, utilize
elsewhere on the site to amend areas with sparse or nutrient
deficient topsoil.
Reduce impact of construction access roads
• Reduce the number and size (width/length) of construction
access roads.
• Locate construction access roads in areas where future roads
and utility corridors will be placed (unless utilizing permeable
pavement).
Promote sheet flow and minimize
• Avoid grading that results in steep, continuous slopes,
concentrated runoff
especially in areas contributing runoff to LID BMPs.
LID BMP activation
• LID BMPs shall not begin operation until all erosion -causing
project improvements (including use of access roads that may
contribute sediment) are completed and all exposed ground
surfaces are stabilized by revegetation or landscaping in
upland areas potentially contributing runoff to the BMP.
a
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 25
Packet Pg. 419
8.1.e
Activities During Construction
Many common construction -phase activities pose a risk to LID BMPs. The following techniques will help
minimize these impacts. Techniques to be used for protection of LID BMPs include:
Erosion Control Requirements
Erosion Control Techniques
Protect native topsoil during the
• Where practicable, protect areas of rich topsoil. If excavation is
construction phase, and reuse on site
necessary, stockpile native soils that can be used on the site
after construction.
• Stockpile materials in areas designated for clearing and
grading (such as parking areas and future impervious
roadways) and away from infiltration and other stormwater
facilities.
• Cover small stockpiles with weed barrier material that sheds
moisture yet allows air transmission. Large stockpiles may
need to be seeded and/or mulched.
• Do not relocate topsoil or other material to areas where they
can cover critical root zones, suffocate vegetation, or erode
into adjacent streams.
Use effective revegetation methods
• Use native plant species adapted to the local environment.
• Plant during late fall, winter, or early spring months when
vegetation is likely to establish quickly and survive.
• Utilize proper seedbed preparation.
Fertilize and mulch to protect germinating plants. Apply 1 inch
of compost topped with 2 inches of mulch.
• Protect areas designated for revegetation from soil
compaction by restricting heavy equipment.
• Provide proper soil amendments where necessary (refer to
SWMMWW, Volume V, Chapter 5, BMP T5.13 Post -
Construction Soil Quality and Depth).
Amend soil toward the end of construction. Once established,
protect from compaction and erosion.
• During storage, plants should be protected by solar screens
when possible to prevent overexposure and excessive drying.
Perform preconstruction, routine, and
• Conduct a preconstruction inspection to verify that adequate
postconstruction inspections
barriers have been placed around vegetation retention areas,
infiltration facilities (as needed), and structural controls are
implemented properly.
• Conduct routine inspections to verify that structural controls
are being maintained and effectively protecting LID BMPs
throughout construction.
• Conduct a final inspection to verify that revegetation areas are
stabilized and that permanent LID BMPs are in place and
functioning ro erl .
26 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 420
8.1.e
6.1.3 BMP-Specific Construction Techniques
This section outlines construction -phase BMP protection techniques specific to categories of LID BMPs
(e.g., infiltration and dispersion) as well as specific LID BMPs (permeable pavement, bioretention
areas/rain gardens, and vegetated roofs). The BMP protection techniques presented previously in
Section 6.1.2 are applicable to the overall construction site to help protect LID BMPs. The techniques
outlined in this section are based on the specific BMP functions, targeting typical construction activities
that pose a risk to individual BMPs.
Infiltration and Dispersion Facility Construction Techniques
It is critical that appropriate methods are used to protect infiltration and dispersion BMPs from
compaction and sediment loading during construction. For infiltration facilities in particular, the subgrade
soils must be protected from clogging and over -compaction to maintain the soil permeability and ensure
BMP performance. Techniques for protection of infiltration and dispersion BMPs during various stages of
construction are summarized below.
Construction Stage
Techniques for Protecting Infiltration and Dispersion Facilities
Prior to construction
• The infiltration/dispersion area shall be clearly identified (e.g., using flagging
or high visibility fencing) and protected prior to construction to prevent
compaction of underlying soils by vehicle traffic.
• Develop a soil and vegetation management plan showing areas to be
protected and restoration methods for disturbed areas before land clearing
sta rts.
• The Construction SWPPP sheets must outline construction sequencing that will
protect the infiltration/dispersion area during construction.
• Construction SWPPP BMPs and protection techniques identified in the
previous sections shall be implemented as applicable. In particular, be sure to
stabilize upslope construction areas (e.g., using silt fences, berms, mulch, or
other Construction SWPPP BMPs) and minimize overland flow distances.
Excavation
• Excavation of infiltration/dispersion areas shall be performed by machinery
operating adjacent to the BMP. No heavy equipment with narrow tracks,
narrow tires, or large lugged high pressure tires shall be allowed on the
infiltration/dispersion area footprint.
• Where feasible, excavate infiltration/dispersion areas to final grade only after
all disturbed areas in the upgradient project drainage area have been
permanently stabilized. (If infiltration areas must be excavated before
permanent site stabilization, initial excavation must be conducted to no less
than 6 inches of the final elevation of the facility floor.)
• Excavation of infiltration areas shall not be allowed during wet or saturated
conditions.
• The use of draglines and trackhoes should be considered for constructing
infiltration and dispersion areas.
• The bottom (and sidewalls if feasible) of an infiltration facility excavation must
be raked or scarified to a minimum depth of 3 inches after final excavation to
restore infiltration rates.
• Scarify soil along the dispersion flow path if disturbed during construction.
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 27
Packet Pg. 421
8.1.e
Construction Stage
Techniques for Protecting Infiltration and Dispersion Facilities
Sediment control
. Bioretention, rain garden, and permeable pavement BMPs shall not be used as
sediment control facilities, and all drainage shall be directed away from the
BMP location after initial rough grading.
Direct construction site flow away from the infiltration/dispersion area using
applicable Construction SWPPP BMPs (e.g., temporary diversion swales).
Permeable Pavement
There are many potential applications and site scenarios where permeable pavement can be applied. The
following techniques highlight the most broadly applicable techniques to be used to protect permeable
pavement BMPs during construction. Refer to the previous section for construction protection methods
that are applicable to all infiltration BMPs, as well as Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 for general site protection
measures. In addition to those techniques, the following techniques apply specifically for protection of
permeable pavement during construction:
• Use procedural BMPs to plan construction. For example, phase construction to minimize
compaction, sedimentation, or structural damage to the permeable pavement.
• Use physical Construction SWPPP BMPs and/or grade the site to avoid sediment laden runoff
from reaching permeable pavements.
• Place protective surfaces (e.g., waterproof tarps and steel plates) over any permeable pavement
areas used for construction staging.
%%
• Do not drive sediment -laden construction equipment on the base material or pavement. Do not
allow sediment -laden runoff on permeable pavements or base materials.
• Once the pavement is finished and set, cover the pavement surface with plastic and geotextile to
protect from other construction activities. Close and protect the pavement area until the site is
permanently stabilized.
• Incorporate measures to protect road subgrade from over compaction and sedimentation if
permeable pavement roads are used for construction access.
o Cover the aggregate base or pavement surface with protective geotextile fabric and protect
fabric with steel plates or gravel. Gravel should only be used to protect the fabric placed over
aggregate base.
o Once construction is complete and the site is permanently stabilized, remove protective
geotextile, clean, and complete pavement installation.
Refer to the detailed permeable pavement BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 5, as
well as City of Edmonds Standard Details for general permeable pavement construction criteria.
28 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 422
8.1.e
Bioretention Areas and Rain Gardens
As with permeable pavements, there are many potential applications and site scenarios where bioretention
and rain garden BMPs can be applied. The following techniques highlight the most broadly applicable
techniques to be used to protect bioretention and rain garden BMPs during construction. Refer to the
beginning of this section for construction protection methods that are applicable to all infiltration BMPs,
as well as Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 for general site protection measures. In addition to those techniques,
the following techniques apply specifically for protection of bioretention and rain garden BMPs during
construction:
• Excavation:
o If machinery must operate in the bioretention area for excavation, use lightweight, low
ground -contact pressure equipment and rip the base at completion to scarify soil to a
minimum of 12 inches.
• Protect bioretention soil mix from compaction during construction
o Do not place bioretention soil mix if saturated or during wet periods.
o Check for compaction prior to planting. If compaction occurs, aerate the bioretention soil and
then proceed to plant.
Refer to the detailed bioretention and rain garden BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V,
Chapter 7, as well as City of Edmonds Standard Details for general bioretention and rain garden
construction criteria. YV
Vegetated Roofs
The following additional techniques apply for protection of vegetated roof facilities during construction:
• Because of their location and complexity, vegetated roofs typically require more planning and
coordination effort relative to ground -level landscaping. For new construction, a critical path
approach is highly recommended to establish the sequence of tasks for construction of the
vegetated roof system.
• During construction, it is vitally important that the waterproof membrane be protected once
installed. The waterproofing should be tested prior to placement of the growth media and other
subsequent vegetated roof materials.
Refer to the detailed vegetated roof BMP information in SWMMWW Volume V, for general
construction criteria.
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 29
Packet Pg. 423
8.1.e
6.2 OFF -SITE ANALYSES AND DOCUMENTATION
All projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 4 shall submit as part of their Stormwater Site Plan an
off -site analysis that assesses the potential off -site impacts of stormwater discharges. The following
sections detail the analysis and documentation requirements for Category 1 and Category 2 projects.
6.2.1 Category 1 Projects
Category 1 projects shall submit a qualitative analysis of potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges for each upstream drainage system entering a site, and each downstream drainage system
leaving a site. The upstream analysis shall identify and describe points where water enters the site. Any
upstream contributing areas shall be identified and mapped in the project Stormwater Site Plan submittal.
The downstream analysis shall extend from the project site to the receiving water, or up to one -quarter
mile, whichever is less. In many cases, runoff that leaves a project site will enter the City's MS4 within
one -quarter mile. In these instances, the project must evaluate and document downstream conditions up to
and including runoff entry into the City's MS4. In addition, the project proponent shall consult with the
City to determine whether the MS4 has any existing or anticipated capacity issues downstream of the
proposed project.
The qualitative analysis shall identify where and how stormwater runoff will leave the proposed
development site, and describe conditions downstream of the site including any existing or anticipated
future problem areas (e.g., spot flooding, property damage, erosion issues, capacity -limited drainage
systems, etc.). The qualitative analysis must be sufficient for the City to evaluate whether the project has
adequately identified potential impacts and whether proposed mitigation measures are supported by the
analysis. Some "rough" quantitative analyses, which can be based on non -surveyed field data, may be
necessary as part of the qualitative analysis to adequately describe or document the extent of observed
problem areas. Note that any off -site field visits should be conducted during winter months and after
significant precipitation events to identify seasonal issues such as flooding, capacity constraints, or
surface seeps or other indicators of near surface groundwater.
A quantitative analysis may also be required for any project where the project proponent or the City
determines that a more thorough analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of
the conveyance system (e.g., where there is evidence of a risk to downstream systems such as erosion,
flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other related impacts). A
quantitative analysis may include calculations and/or modeling analyses of on -site and off -site water
quality, erosion, slope stability, and other drainage -related impacts that may be caused or aggravated by a
proposed project.
6.2.2 Category 2 Projects
All Category 2 projects shall submit a qualitative analysis of potential off -site impacts of stormwater
discharges that extend downstream from the site to the receiving water. (If the ultimate discharge point is
to Puget Sound via a culvert owned by BNSF Railway, the analysis must be followed through the
drainage system all the way to Puget Sound.) A quantitative analysis may also be required for any project
deemed to need additional downstream information or where the project engineer or the City determines
that a quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance
system (e.g., where there are known capacity issues or where there is evidence of a risk to downstream
30 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 424
8.1.e
systems such as erosion, flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality degradation, or other
related impacts).
The qualitative analysis must be sufficient for the City to evaluate whether the project has adequately
identified potential impacts and whether proposed mitigation measures are supported by the analysis.
Some "rough" quantitative analysis, which can be based on non -surveyed field data, may be required at
this stage. A downstream analysis of the project for a minimum of one -quarter of a mile is required. The
analysis must also extend upstream to a point beyond any backwater effects caused by the project. The
analysis must include field -inspection of all existing stormwater drainage systems downstream from the
project and a determination of whether the capacity of the drainage system(s) is adequate to handle the
existing flows, flows generated by the proposed project, and any overflow. Adequacy will be evaluated
based on conveyance capacity, flooding problems, erosion damage or potential, amount of freeboard in
channel and pipes, and storage potential within the system. Note that site visits should be conducted
during winter months and after significant precipitation events to identify undocumented surface seeps or
other indicators of near surface groundwater. See the end of this section for specific topics to be discussed
in the qualitative analysis.
When deemed necessary by the project engineer or required by the City, a quantitative analysis shall
include the qualitative analysis describe above, as well as quantitative calculations and/or modeling
analyses of on -site and off -site water quality, erosion, slope stability, and other drainage -related impacts
that may be caused or aggravated by a proposed project. Measures for preventing impacts and for not
aggravating existing impacts shall also be identified. ("Aggravating existing impacts" means increasing
the frequency of occurrence and/or severity of an impact.) The analysis shall document how temporary
and permanent flow control and water quality control measures identified in the Stormwater Site Plan will
mitigate the potential to create new problems or aggravate existing conditions. In many cases, design of
flow control and water quality systems according to the procedures contained in this Addendum and the
SWMMWW will be adequate demonstration of mitigation. However, upon review of this analysis and the
severity of an existing problem, the City may require more detailed analysis and/or additional mitigation
measures. In general, all existing and proposed off -site surface water conveyance systems shall be sized
to convey flows without surcharging the City's storm system (or BNSF culverts under the railroad tracks,
if applicable).
Both the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analyses (when required) shall include descriptions
and/or analyses of the following items. The descriptions shall identify existing or potential problem areas,
and whether adequate mitigation can be identified (or whether more detailed quantitative analysis is
necessary). References to other Stormwater Site Plan sections (e.g., facility sizing, conveyance,
attachments and appendices, etc.) are encouraged to reduce plan redundancy, as long as all of the required
Stormwater Site Plan issues are clearly presented:
• Describe the drainage system between the site and the receiving surface waters. Provide
information on pipe sizes, channel characteristics, and drainage structures. Describe emergency
services located along the flow path (e.g., fire/police stations, hospitals). Describe
environmentally sensitive areas, such as wetlands, etc.
• Describe the upstream drainage tributary to the project. Describe any bypass drainage from the
project which will not be controlled.
• The bulk of the analysis shall focus on highlights of important considerations from the project
overview and off -site analysis sections related to the drainage system and potential problems or
concerns. Existing and potential impacts to be evaluated and mitigated shall include, but not be
limited to:
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 31
Packet Pg. 425
8.1.e
O Conveyance system capacity issues.
o Flooding or bank overtopping.
o Upland erosion impacts, including slope stability and landslide hazards.
O Stream channel erosion (at the outfall location and to the downstream limit of analysis).
O Violations of surface water quality standards as identified in a Basin Plan or a TMDL/Water
Cleanup Plan (e.g., for Lake Ballinger).
O For each existing or potential problem, document: the magnitude of damage caused by the
problem, the general frequency and duration, current mitigation of the problem (if any), the
likely or possible cause of the problem, and whether the project is likely to aggravate the
problem or create a new one.
• Determine whether the project is within any other critical areas or their buffers as defined in
ECDC, and whether any additional requirements apply.
• All areas pertinent to the analyses such as site boundaries, study area boundaries, streets and
prominent features, downstream flow path, potential/existing problems, etc. shall be keyed to
features shown on the project map(s).
6.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR DETENTION VAULTS AND
PIPES T
This section includes design requirements and associated information for detention vaults and detention
pipes. The focus of this section is on the use of detention vaults and pipes to meet Minimum Requirement
No. 5. For other design applications (e.g., to meet Minimum Requirement No. 7), designers must refer to
the SWMMWW.
For Category 1 and 2 projects that must comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5, the final option that
is available for roofs and other hard surfaces under List No. 1 and List No. 2 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.5
[d] or [e]) is the use of detention vaults or detention pipes. When using detention vaults or pipes to
comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5 using List No. 1 or List No. 2 in the City of Edmonds, the
following requirements apply. Note that if the project is required to construct a flow control facility to
comply with Minimum Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to
be installed to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5.
The City may waive the requirement to install a detention vault or pipe if the downstream analysis in
Minimum Requirement No. 4, or available City data indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial. Note
that this exemption is rare and most similar to the direct discharge exemption in SWMMWW; qualifin
g
for this exception will require unique site circumstances and may require additional information or
calculations from the applicant to demonstrate lack of benefit. It shall not be applied to any site which
discharges, direct or indirectly, to a stream, creek, wetland, or floodplain.
32 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 426
8.1.e
6.3.1 Sizing & Design
The City has created simplified sizing techniques for detention vaults and pipes for use in complying with
Minimum Requirement No. 5. The sizing calculations and requirements presented below are designed to
optimize detention facility functions relative to peak flow control as well as runoff "volume managed."
Volume managed is a measure of the difference between facility inflow and outflow rates, and is
evaluated using continuous simulation hydrologic modeling by comparing inflow and outflow over the
entire continuous simulation. Volume managed represents an estimate of the amount of the storm flow
that is attenuated (or removed, for facilities that utilize infiltration) by the flow control facility.
To comply with Minimum Requirement No. 5, detention vaults or pipes must be installed for any site
impervious surfaces totaling greater than or equal to 1,000 square feet that are not managed by other On -
Site Stormwater Management BMPs. This includes areas from multiple types of surfaces listed under the
list options in Minimum Requirement No. 5. For example, if unmanaged flows from roofs plus driveway
areas exceed 1,000 square feet and runoff from both surfaces can be routed to a single vault, a vault shall
be installed. In addition, projects may elect to route "managed" flows to the vault if desired (e.g., where
runoff from an installed On -Site Stormwater Management BMPs cannot be easily separated from runoff
drainage to the vault.) In this scenario, no upsizing of the vault is required for the "managed" areas. Only
the unmanaged surfaces need to be included in the sizing calculations below.
The City of Edmonds has developed standards specifically for vaults and pipes used to meet Minimum
Requirement No. 5 only. See City standard detail SD-651 for detention tank requirements specific to
minimum Requirement #5; this detail shall be completed with design information and included with any
elan set nr000sina detention under Minimum Reauirement #5.
For compliance with Minimum Requirement No. 7, SWMMWW Volume V, Chapter 12 requirements
apply.
For vaults efTipe-s-with contributing areas greater than or equal to 1,000 square feet the following sizing
requirements apply:
• Orifice size for- vaults and pi-pes fyms+shall be 0.5 inches
• Vault interior bottom area = 2 percent of contributing surface area
• Vault minimum active storage depth = 3.0 feet
�as�ssrsassa�- --
•
��•
6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 33
Packet Pg. 427
8.1.e
6.4 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROLS
With each update to the SWMMWW, the Department of Ecology continues to emphasize the importance
of maximizing the use of infiltration for stormwater runoff control. Given the heavy emphasis on
infiltration in the SWMMWW, and thus ECDC 18.30 and this Addendum, it is important to be aware of
related requirements for Underground Injection Controls (UICs).
In certain situations, BMPs that rely on infiltration are classified as UICs and may be regulated by
Ecology under the UIC Program (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 173 218). For more
information on UICs, see the 2006 Eeelegy deetiment titled dui a-mee fe UIC Wells��ge
Steat .SWMMWW
Volume I, Chapter 4 (UIC Program).
*IV
34 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 428
8.1.e
7 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Stormwater Site Plans are required for all projects subject to Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation
of Stormwater Site Plans (as well as for preparation of a Construction SWPPP, in accordance with
Minimum Requirement No. 2), as outlined in Chapter 3 and ECDC 18.30.060.C. This chapter
summarizes the requirements for submittals of stormwater plans, reports, and other documents for review
by the City of Edmonds.
As noted in Section 5.1, Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 3 of
Volume 1 of the SWMMWW. However, the City of Edmonds has developed checklists to facilitate
compliance with Minimum Requirement No. 1 (and thus project submittal and review). This Addendum
includes a summary of core submittal requirements for Category 1 and Category 2 projects as Checklists
1 and 2 in Appendix C.
7.1 CATEGORY 1 STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans for Category 1 projects must address Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5
Detailed descriptions of submittal requirements are provided in Appendix C, Checklists 1 through 3. A
schematic showing the components of a typical Category 1 project submittal is presented in Figure 7.1.
Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components
Site Development Drawings and
Reports and Construction SWPPP Drawings
Documentation (i.e., construction drawings)
Stormwater Site Plan Report,
Supporting Documents, and Calculations
Soils Report
Construction SWPPP Narrative
Establishment of Maintenance Covenant
Appendices
Figure 7.1. Typical Category 1 Stormwater Site Plan Components.
7.2 CATEGORY 2 STORMWATER SITE PLANS
Stormwater Site Plans for Category 2 projects include the full submittal package meeting all minimum
requirements. The Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan submittal package includes the following
7. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 35
Packet Pg. 429
8.1.e
components: Stormwater Site Plan Report, Site Development Drawings, Soils Report, Construction
SWPPP, Operations and Maintenance Manual, Maintenance Covenant, and any plan appendices. A
schematic showing the components of a typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan submittal package is
presented in Figure 7.2. The Construction SWPPP consists of two parts: a narrative report and drawings,
which should be included in the plan set with the other Site Development Drawings. Detailed descriptions
of submittal requirements are provided in Appendix C, Checklist 2.
Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components
Site Development Drawings
Reports and (i.e., construction drawings)
Documentation
Stormwater Site Plan Report, General Drawings
Supporting Documents, and Calculations Construction SWPPP Drawings
Soils Report Grading/Earthwork Drawings
Construction SWPPP Narrative Plan/Profile Drawings
Operation and Maintenance Manual Detail Drawings
Establishment of Maintenance Covenant
Appendices
Figure 7.2. Typical Category 2 Stormwater Site Plan Components.
36 7. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Packet Pg. 430
8.1.e
Appendix A — On -Site Stormwater
Management BMP Infeasibility Criteria
Packet Pg. 431
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
W
�L
d
ci
IL
m
c
m
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 432
j� �n�oNE 201,?OCTOBER 2021
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.e
Appendix B — Methods for Determining
Design Infiltration Rates
Packet Pg. 433
8.1.e
a
Packet Pg. 434
j� �n�oNE 201,?OCTOBER 2021
EDMONDS STORMWATER ADDENDUM
8.1.e
Appendix C — Checklists for Various Project
Submittal, Review, and Field Procedure
Elements
Packet Pg. 435
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
W
�L
ci
IL
m
c
m
o:
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 436
8.1.e
Appendix D — Design Checklists for the Main
On -Site Stormwater Management BM Ps
j
Packet Pg. 437
8.1.e
U
U
W_
d
O
v
C
d
E
O
R
C
R
L
Cu
:
E
L
O
L
O
W
�L
d
ci
IL
m
c
m
E
c
a�
Q
L
Cu
3
E
L
O
O
E
W
W
r_
d
E
t
ci
f+
Q
E
0
Q
Packet Pg. 438
2022 ECDC 18.30 and Stormwater Addendum Summary of Changes
8.1.f
#
Document
Section
Direction
Summary of Old requirement
Summary of New requirement
Estimated Impact
(Old/new)
From
Minimal as most revisions were re -organization of existing elements; see Ecology
1
ECDC 18.30
Entirety
Ecology
Aligned with 2014 SWMMWW
Aligned with 2019 SWMMWW
Executive Summary and Crosswalk documents for more information.
2
ECDC 18.30
18.30.010
EcologyAligned
with previous NPDES permit Appendix 1
g p p pp
Aligned with new NPDES permit Appendix 1
g p pp
Minimal; City code did not include a couple of the definitions listed in Appendix A but
revised/new definitions generally consistent with previous definitions.
"Road -related project" definition vague on application
"Road -related project" definition revised to clarify that
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with City staff
3
ECDC 18.30
18.30.010
City Staff
to frontage improvements as part of development
frontage improvements as part of development project
interpretation which was confirmed by Ecology staff.
project
are not considered road -related projects
"Site" definition which does not address relationship
"Site" definition updated to clarify that drainage
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with previous City staff
4
ECDC 18.30
18.30.010
City Staff
with separate definition for "project site"
requirements are assessed against the "project site", not
.
interpretation.
this definition.
5
ECDC 18.30
18.30.010
Ecology
Old Example TDA Delineations figure
Updated Example TDA Delineations figure
None; revised for clarity only.
Makes new standard effective to (1) new projects after Jan. 1, 2022, (2) projects under
a previous/older version of drainage code but not under construction yet, and (3)
projects approved under the current drainage code which have not started construction
6
ECDC 18.30
18.30.030
Ecology
Old dates of applicability for previous code.
Updated dates of new code applicability.
by 2027. These dates align with specific requirements per the revised NPDES permit;
except that new code applies starting January 1, 2022 instead of last acceptable date of
July 1, 2022. This is essentially the states way of managing the vesting of drainage
requirements.
7
ECDC 18.30
18.30.040
Ecology
,,i
Older language referring to "impervious"
simplified,
Newer language referring to "hard" surfaces, ,
None; revisions for clarity and constancy only.
and rearranged to better match SWMMWW format
18.30.040.
"Underground utility project" exemption does not
"Underground utility project" exemption clarifies that
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with previous City staff
8
ECDC 18.30
B.1
City Staff
define underground utility project.
utilities as part of development do not qualify for this
interpretation.
partial exemption.
New connections for areas over 2,000 to be handled like
Closes loop hole which could impact City system, but may limit resident options for
18.30.060.
New connections for existing surfaces were addressed
anew project, and all surfaces mitigated unless
home improvement (non -development) projects. This limits impacts to City system and
9
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
case -by -case and allowed applicant to potentially
aligns with the intent of SWMMWW better (which seeks to return flows to historic,
C.3
connect without mitigation if determine acceptable.
applicant can demonstrate previous drainage was
forested, conditions), but homeowners seeking to improve their home (without
similar impact on City system.
development/expansion), may be impacted by this additional burden as well.
18.30.060.
Treatment trade/equivalent area text scattered through
Explicit language permitting the use of equivalent areas
None; revised language form Ecology is consistent with past staff interpretations and
10
ECDC 18.30
C.4
Ecology
out document.
for stormwater mitigation.
the use equivalent areas was already being permitted within Edmonds.
Retrofit requirement requires 25% of existing
Additional protection for Perrinville Creek but potential additional cost to home owners
11
ECDC 18.30
18.30.060.
City Staff
unmanaged surfaces to remain on a project site, to be
Specific to Perrinville Basin, the value increases form
and developers. This provisions not only seeks to limit further impacts from
D.S.b.i
mitigated per minimum requirement #5 ( LID
25% to 50%.
development to the creek, it actually seeks to partially address historic impacts which
requirement) for all areas.
have already been impressed upon the creek.
18.30.060.
Retrofit requirement a bit vague on impact to other
Added clarifying text that retrofit is a stand alone
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with City staff
12
ECDC 18.30
D.S.b.i
City Staff
requirements.
requirement for MR #5 which does not impact other
interpretation.
thresholds or application of minimum requirements.
Projects on Edmonds Way will comply with same drainage standard as rest of City. This
13
ECDC 18.30
18.30.060.
City Staff
Reduced BMP list and flow standard for Edmonds Way
No exception or reduction for Edmonds Way
system is known to overflow to Edmonds Marsh which means it no longer has capacity
D.S.b.iv
basin as direct discharge basin.
for further under -mitigated development and contributes to a non -man-made drainage
course; both are factors making this basin not eligible to be a direct discharge basin.
Page 1 of 3
Versi packet Pg. 439
2022 ECDC 18.30 and Stormwater Addendum Summary of Changes
8.1.f
#
Document
Section
Direction
Summary of Old requirement
Summary of New requirement
Estimated Impact
(Old/new)
From
New section addressing rare case where projects have
expansions under thresholds, but would impact and
This is a rare circumstance, and designers would simply route such minor addition areas
14
ECDC 18.30
18.30.060.
City Staff
N/A - New section
existing infiltration systems with surface overflows. Such
to a separate drywell/infiltration system in most cases so while this revisions closes a
D.S.b.vi
cases shall expand the BMP accordingly to not have new
loop hole, the actually impacts to project is anticipated to be minimal.
impacts.
18.30.060.
Direct discharge permitted some exceptions from
Explicitly requires the application of the amended soils
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with previous City staff
14
ECDC 18.30
Ecology
D.S.c.i
certain BMPs, but vague.
BMP even when meeting performance criteria.
interpretation.
18.30.060.
Full dispersion and full infiltration listed in same bullet in
Full infiltration separated as its own bullet, just under
None, revise for clarity only. Because all other BMPs are listed individually, full
15
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
D.S.d & e
list
full dispersion.
infiltration is often overlooked by designers.
Reduces use of perforated pipe connection on SFRs and gains more detention.
Perforated pipe connections are a last ditch effort to get infiltration on sites which
otherwise have been determined infeasible for full infiltration; because of this staff
believe they achieve very little been fit from a stormwater perspective. Often designers
18.30.060.
Perforated pipe connection listed as higher priority than
Detention tanks listed as higher priority than perforated
want to put the perforated pipe connection in risky places to avoid detention. It has
16
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
D.S.d & e
detention tanks in all LID BMP Lists
pipe connections in all LID BMP Lists
also been leveraged against a partial exemption for detention for infeasible surfaces
collection to avoid a driveway BMP all together. Because Edmonds has the unique code
which adds detention tanks to the bottom of the Ecology required BMP list, the City
drainage system would be better protected by requiring a detention tanks before
perforate pipe connections.
Hard surfaces BMP list does not include full infiltration
Full infiltration added as equal to permeable pavements
None, revise for clarity only. Staff have permitted full infiltration in other BMPs in -lieu
17
ECDC 18.30
18.30.060.
City Staff
option other than permeable pavements. Permeable
and raingardens/bioretention separate as its own bullet
of permeable pavements. Because all other BMPs are listed individually,
D.S.d & e
pavements listed as second priority, and with
below full infiltration/permeable pavements.
raingardens/bioretention was often overlooked.
raingardens/bioretention.
18.30.060.
Detention tank language included in exclusions each
Detention additional exclusions moved Section 6.3 of
None, revise for clarity only. Exception extra/repeated text explanation as was more
18
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
D.S.d & e
time detention tank was listed.
the Edmonds Addendum instead.
appropriate in addendum text than in these bulleted lists.
"Overflows" section added to clarify City overflow
expectations for BMPs meeting MR #5 only. Piped
18.30.060.
overflow required unless project infiltrates full 100-year
None; added for clarity only. Revised definition is consistent with City staff
19
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
None; new section.
D.S.f
storm. Re -iterates that surface route still needs to be
interpretation.
controlled if permitted. Provide very rough guidance on
extension length expectations.
Language regarding untreated discharges to
18.30.060.
Language regarding untreated discharges to
20
ECDC 18.30
Ecology
groundwater included updated to match latest version
None, revision for clarity and consistency only.
D.6
groundwater included old references.
and references.
Flow control exemption text for direct discharges to
Puget Sound did not include reference to additional
18.30.060.
Additional requirements necessary to qualify for a direct
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
21
ECDC 18.30
City Staff
requirements necessary to demonstrate compliance
D.7
discharge exemption is now referenced.
interpretation.
with the associated minimum requirement for the
exemption.
New section for elevated flow control in Perrinville
Creek basin. Language is the same as King County's
Better protection of Perrinville Creek; which is significantly impacted by historic upland
22
ECDC 18.30
18.30.060.
City Staff
Standard flow control for all areas of City
Level 3 flow control standard which requires matching
development. Larger developments (> 10,000 SF) will have to install larger retention
D 7
the 100-year peak in addition to standard flow control
systems (increased cost).
standards.
Page 2 of 3
Versi packet Pg. 440
2022 ECDC 18.30 and Stormwater Addendum Summary of Changes
8.1.f
#
Document
Section
Direction
Summary of Old requirement
Summary of New requirement
Estimated Impact
(Old/new)
From
References new Ecology section for UIC. New section
Limited impact; UICs under this program are under Ecology authority for approval not
provides additional guidance and generally states that
City. City notifies applicant of need to file UIC notice with Ecology and continues
23
Addendum
Section 2.4
Ecology
UIC referenced old code section.
discharges to UICs must meet the provisions of
drainage review per typical application of SWMMWW provisions (namely water quality
SWMMWW.
treatment).
No language supporting the existing internal policy of
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
24
Addendum
Section 2.6
City Staff
Language added to prohibit the use of CMP pipes.
prohibiting the use of CMP pipes.
interpretation.
Closes loop hole which could impact City system, but may limit resident options for
home improvement projects. Previously, this section allowed new connections to the
Update to match revisions to 18.30.060.C.3; minimum
City system without mitigation for existing surfaces. Section revised to require typical
requirements apply to new connection of non-
mitigation for all new connections draining more than 2000 SF of hard surfaces, unless
25
Addendum
Section
City Staff
Reflected old 18.30.060.C.3 language
development projects over 2,000 SF impervious unless
applicant can demonstrate that the City system will not be impacted in any way. This
3.1.2
applicant can demonstrate previous drainage was
limits impacts to City system and aligns with the intent of SWMMWW better (which
similar impact on City system.
seeks to return flows to historic, forested, conditions), but homeowners seeking to
improve their home (without development/expansion), may be impacted by this
additional burden as well.
Language update to include missing departures formNone;
Section
List of change form SWMWW missing a couple existing
added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
26
Addendum
City Staff
SWMMWW; none of the referenced code is new, the
3.1.3
differences.
interpretation.
items were just added to the list for clarity.
Projects on Edmonds Way will comply with same drainage standard as rest of City. This
Edmonds Way explicitly stated not to be consider a
system is known to overflow to Edmonds Marsh which means it no longer has capacity
27
Addendum
Section 4.1
City Staff
Edmonds Way included as a direct discharge basin
direct discharge basin due to overflow to Edmonds
for further under -mitigated development and contributes to a non -man-made drainage
Marsh.
course; both are factors making this basin not eligible to be a direct discharge basin.
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
28
Addendum
Section 5.3
City Staff
Policy to prohibit CMP not actually in code.
Updated language to reflect prohibition of CMP
interpretation and extremely rare.
Projects on Edmonds Way will comply with same drainage standard as rest of City. This
No exception or reduction for Edmonds Way; update
system is known to overflow to Edmonds Marsh which means it no longer has capacity
29
Addendum
Section 5.5
City Staff
Reduced BMP list and flow standard for Edmonds Way.
consistent with update to 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv, above.
for further under -mitigated development and contributes to a non -man-made drainage
course; both are factors making this basin not eligible to be a direct discharge basin.
Vague requirements for sites not draining to MS4 but
Revised language to make it more clear that pumping to
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
30
Addendum
Section 5.5
City Staff
pumped to MS4 in post -project conditions.
MS4 requires application of all provisions in ECDC 18.30
interpretation and extremely rare.
BMP sizing direction tucked within each checklist or
Paragraph 7 added to clarify simplified sizing per
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
31
Addendum
Section 5.5
City Staff
BMP description but never referenced in MR #5 section
SWMMWW is allowable but requires piped overflow.
interpretation.
Detention vault requirements for MR #5 included vague
Additional language added to the extra City requirement
None; added for clarity only. Revised section is consistent with previous City staff
32
Addendum
Section 6.3
City Staff
line about City allowing exception to this requirement
for detention tank under MR #5 to clarify application of
for certain cases.
their exception.
interpretation.
Section
Detention tank text updated to reference new standard
None; added for clarity only. Revised section and detail are consistent with previous
33
Addendum
6.3.1
City Staff
Detention Tank specification provide via text
detail for detention tanks/
City staff direction.
Page 3 of 3
Versi packet Pg. 441
8.1.g
Ecology Executive Summary of the
2019 Revisions & Edmonds Response
The Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) provides
guidance on the measures necessary to control the quantity and quality of stormwater.
Local municipalities use this manual to set stormwater requirements for new
development and redevelopment projects. Land developers and development engineers
use this manual to design permanent stormwater control plans, create construction
stormwater pollution prevention plans, and determine stormwater infrastructure.
Businesses use this manual to help design their stormwater pollution prevention plans.
The greatest use of the SWMMWW has been through National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permits. The Municipal Stormwater General
Permits for western Washington incorporate and reference the SWMMWW. The
Industrial Stormwater General Permit, Construction Stormwater General Permit,
Boatyard General Permit, and the Sand and Gravel General Permit reference the
SWMMWW. Since 2005, Ecology has reissued or issued for the first time all of these
NPDES stormwater permits. The 2019 revisions to the SWMMWW will continue to help
permittees comply with these permits.
This document is a modified version of the Executive Summary of the 2019 Revisions
as provided by the Department of Ecology. Black text represent text from the original
Ecology document, while red text indicates text added by City of Edmonds staff. City -
added text outlines how the City documents were updated (if needed) to reflect the
corresponding Ecology revision.
Prepared By: Zachary Richardson, City of Edmonds Stormwater Engineer
Updated: June 22, 2021
Types of Revisions
Usability Enhancements
The focus of the 2019 update was to enhance the usability, which will result in improved
implementation of the stormwater permits that rely on this guidance. Enhancements
include:
• Fully embracing the online user (maintain the interactive online format)
• Consolidating repetitive information
• Revising text for clarity
• Reordering sections for a better flow of concepts
References in ECDC checked against SWMMWW crosswalk and updated as needed
Several sections updated for clarity per City staff direction as well; see separate
Edmonds Summary of Change document for additional information.
Packet Pg. 442
8.1.g
Significant Changes
Ecology also identified the following changes that must be made in order to continue to
provide the best guidance available:
Continuous Simulation Modeling: Text throughout the SWMMWW has been
updated to require continuous simulation models that include:
o The ability to directly model BMPs that may be used in LID applications, such
as bioretention, permeable pavement, and green roofs.
0 15-minute time steps.
o Incorporation of the van Genuchten algorithm to model bioretention.
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW; no
change within ECDC is needed.
2. Replaced Hard Surfaces Redevelopment Threshold: The Minimum
Requirement Thresholds for non -road related commercial or industrial
redevelopment projects have been updated to require the project proponent to
compare the value of the proposed improvements to the value of the Project Site
(the limits of disturbance) improvements, rather than the Site (the entire parcel)
improvements.
The re -development provisions associated with project valuation were previously
removed from ECDC 18.30; no changes within ECDC needed.
3. Equivalent Areas: The Redevelopment Project Thresholds have been updated to
allow a project proponent to provide Stormwater Management BMPs for an
equivalent area. The equivalent area may be on -site, or off -site if the area drains to
the same receiving water and the guidance for in -basin transfers is followed.
ECDC 18.30.060.C.4 added to include language from Appendix 1. The new
language is consistent with past staff interpretation and is not a new impact in
practice.
4. Minimum Requirement 2: The 13 Elements in 1-3.4.2 MR2: Construction
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) have been updated to incorporate
changes that were made to the 2015-2020 Construction Stormwater General
Permit.
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW; no
change within ECDC is needed.
5. Minimum Requirement 5: 1-3.4.5 MR5: On -Site Stormwater Management has
been updated to require BMP T5.13: Post -Construction Soil Quality and
Depth when choosing to use the LID Performance Standard to meet Minimum
Requirement 5 for Minimum Requirement 1-5 projects.
Packet Pg. 443
8.1.g
ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.c.i added to require BMP T5.13 when meeting performance
criteria. The new language is consistent with past staff interpretation and is not a
new impact in practice.
6. Minimum Requirement 7: 1-3.4.7 MR7: Flow Control has been updated to ensure
that a TDA discharging to a marine waterbody meets all exemption requirements
before it can be determined to be Flow Control exempt.
Changes to this section were already incorporated into City code in ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.b.iv; no change within ECDC is needed.
7. Concrete Washout BMPs: BMP C151: Concrete Handling and BMP C154:
Concrete Washout Area have been updated to clarify that auxiliary concrete truck
components and small concrete handling equipment may be washed into formed
areas awaiting concrete pour, while concrete truck drums must be washed either
off -site or into a concrete washout area.
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW; no
change within ECDC is needed.
8. Source Control BMPs: Volume IV (Source Control BMP Library) has been
updated with Source Control BMPs for activities not listed in previous versions of
the manual. The new activities with Source Control BMPs are:
o S434 BMPs for Dock Washing
o S441 BMPs for Potable Water Line Flushina, Water Tank
Maintenance, and Hydrant Testing
o S435 BMPs for Pesticides and an Integrated Pest Management
Program
o S444 BMPs for the Storage of Dry Pesticides and Fertilizers
o S449 BMPs for Nurseries and Greenhouses
o S450 BMPs for Irrigation
o S445 BMPs for Temporary Fruit Storage
o S439 BMPs for In -Water and Over -Water Fueling
o S436 BMPs for Color Events
o S438 BMPs for Construction Demolition
o S440 BMPs for Pet Waste
o S442 BMPs for Labeling Storm Drain Inlets On Your Property
o S443 BMPs for Fertilizer Application
o S446 BMPs for Well, Utility, Directional and Geotechnical Drillini
o S447 BMPs for Roof Vents
o S451 BMPs for Buildina. Repair. Remodelina. Paintina, and
Cnnstructinn
o S452 BMPs for Goose Waste
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW; no
change within ECDC is needed except to update references as needed.
Packet Pg. 444
8.1.g
9. Wetlands Guidance: Appendix I-C: Wetland Protection Guidelines and I-
3.4.8 MR8: Wetlands Protection have been updated to require monitoring
and modeling of high value wetlands, if the project proponent has legal
access to them. The 2014 wetland guidance is retained, but refined, for
modeling requirements for lower value wetlands (and high value wetlands
that the project proponent does not have legal access to).
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of
SWMMWW; no change within ECDC is needed.
Other Updates
Other updates include:
Incorporation of UIC Program guidance. See 1-4 UIC Program.
Edmonds Addendum Section 2.4 updated with revised reference to new UIC
section.
Expanded guidance for regional facilities. See Appendix I-D: Regional Facilities
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW;
no change within ECDC is needed.
Guidance for stormwater control transfer programs. See Appendix I-E:
Stormwater Control Transfer Program.
Changes to this section were entirely within referenced sections of SWMMWW;
no change within ECDC is needed.
Packet Pg. 445
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW
Ecology has provided the crosswalk below to help you identify where content has been moved and/or renamed
CU
between the 2014 and 2019 manuals. Note that during the 2019 update some sections were merged together
and/or edited for clarity. Therefore, you may not find the exact language from the 2014 manual in the linked
M
sections of the 2019 manual indicated below. The links below will lead you to where the updated content is
contained in the 2019 manual, providing updated guidance on the topic from the 2014 manual.
o
Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 2019
SWMMWW
Executive Summary
Executive Summary of the 2019 Revisions
Volume I Content
Volume I Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
1-1 - Introduction
(no content in this section)
1-1.1 - Objective
1-1.1 About This Manual
1-1.2 - Applicability to Western Washington
1-1.2 Applicability to Western Washington
1-1.3 - Organization of this Manual
1-1.1 About This Manual
1-1.4 - How to Use this Manual
1-1.1 About This Manual
1-1.5 - Development of Best Management Practices
1-1.5 Types of Best Management Practices
for Stormwater Management
.(BMPs) for Stormwater Management
1-1.6 - Relationship of this Manual to Federal, State,
1-2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits,
and Local Regulatory Requirements
Requirements, and Programs
1-1.7 - Effects of Urbanization
1-1.3 Effects of Urbanization
1-2 - Minimum Requirements for New Development
1-3.1 Introduction to the Minimum
and Redevelopment
Requirements
1-2.1 - Relationship to Municipal Stormwater
1-2.4 Phase I and Western Washington Phase
Permits
II Municipal Stormwater Permits
1-2.2 - Exemptions
1-3.2 Exemptions
1-2.3 - Definitions Related to Minimum
Requirements
Glossary_
I
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P Packet Pg. 446
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
1-2.4 - Applicability of the Minimum Requirements
1-3.3 Applicability of the Minimum
Requirements
1-2.5 - Minimum Requirements
1-3.1 Introduction to the Minimum
a
Requirements
3
I-2.5.1 -Minimum Requirement #1: Preparation
1-3.4.1 MR1: Preparation of Stormwater Site
Ci
o
of Stormwater Site Plans
Plans
U
0
1-2.5.2 - Minimum Requirement #2: Construction
I-3.4.2 MR2: Construction Stormwater
w
v
Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP)
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP),
o
1-2.5.3 - Minimum Requirement #3: Source
Control of Pollution
1-3.4.3 MR3: Source Control of Pollution
E
a�
c
1-2.5.4 - Minimum Requirement #4: Preservation
I-3.4.4 MR4: Preservation of Natural Drainage
CU
E
of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Systems and Outfalls
3
1-2.5.5 - Minimum Requirement #5: On -site
1-3.4.5 MR5: On -Site Stormwater
E
o
Stormwater Management
Management
y
0
1-2.5.6 - Minimum Requirement #6: Runoff
c
Treatment
1-3.4.6 MR6: Runoff Treatment
x
1-2.5.7 - Minimum Requirement #7: Flow Control
I-3.4.7 MR7: Flow Control
.0
a
1-2.5.8 - Minimum Requirement #8: Wetlands
Protection
1-3.4.8 MR8: Wetlands Protection
1-2.5.9 - Minimum Requirement #9: Operation
c
and Maintenance
1-3.4.9 MR9: Operation and Maintenance
c
N
1
1-2.6 - Optional Guidance
1-3.5 Additional Protective Measures
.(Optional)
N
I-2.7 -Adjustments
1-3.6.1 Adjustments to the MRs
3
I-2.8 -Exceptions/Variances
1-3.6.2 Exceptions/Variances to the MRs
o
U
1-3 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
III-3.1 Introduction to Stormwater Site Plans
=
r
c
1-3.1 - Stormwater Site Plans: Step -by -Step
III-3.2 Preparing a Stormwater Site Plan
E
111-3.3 Changes to a Previously Approved
Ca
Q
Stormwater Site Plan
1-3.2 - Plans Required After Stormwater Site Plan
E
Approval
and
0
r
III-3.4 Final Corrected Plan Submittal
I
r
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P Packet Pg. 447
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20
SWMMWW
1-4 - BMP and Facility Selection Process for Permanent
(no content in this section)
Stormwater Control Plans
I-4.1 -Purpose
1-2.2 AKART
o
M
1-4.2 - BMP and Facility Selection Process
III-1 Choosing Your BMPs
Go
v
0
Volume I References
References
w
a�
Appendix I -A: Guidance for Altering the Minimum
Requirements through Basin Planning
Appendix I-B: Basin Plans
E
as
Appendix I-B: Rainfall Amounts and Statistics
Appendix III-C: Rainfall Amounts and
Statistics
Appendix I-C: Basic Treatment Receiving Waters
Appendix III -A: Basic Treatment Receiving
Waters
3
Appendix I-D: Guidelines for Wetlands when Managing
E
Stormwater
Appendix I-C: Wetland Protection Guidelines
2
L
0
Appendix I-E: Flow Control -Exempt Surface Waters
Appendix I -A: Flow Control Exempt Receiving
Waters
Appendix I-F: Basins with 40% or more Total
I-3.4.7 MR7: Flow Control
=
Impervious Area as of 1985
2
Appendix I-G: Glossary and Notations
Glossary
a
Volume II Content
Volume II Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
in
r
O
Acronyms
Glossary_
N
II-1 - Introduction to Construction Stormwater Pollution
CD
N
Prevention
(no content in this section)
3
II-1.1 - Purpose of this Volume
Executive Summary of Volume II
c`�
I
11-1.2 - Content, Organization, and Use of this
=
Volume
1-1.1 About This Manual
E
II-1.3 -Thirteen Elements of Construction
1-3.4.2 MR2: Construction Stormwater
Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
Q
a�
11-1.4 - Erosion and Sedimentation Impacts
II-1.3 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Impacts
z
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocp Packet Pg. 448
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20
SWMMWW
II-1.1 Soil Erosion
as
II-1.5 - Erosion and Sedimentation Processes
and
a
II-1.2 Sedimentation
M
r
II-1.6 - Factors Influencing Erosion Potential
II-1.1 Soil Erosion
w
II-2 - Regulatory Requirements
1-2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits,
Requirements, and Programs
o
11-2.1 - The Construction Stormwater General
Permit
1-2.7 Construction Stormwater General Permit
E
a�
II-2.2 -Construction Stormwater Pollution
II-2.2 When is a Construction SWPPP
f°
Prevention Plans
Required?
11-2.3 - Water Quality Standards
I-2.10 Water Quality Standards
E
`o
0
II-2.4 -Endangered Species Act
1-2.8 Endangered Species Act
U)
o
II-2.5 - Other Applicable Regulations and Permits
I-2.15 Other Requirements
as
II-3 - Planning
II-2 Construction Stormwater Pollution
U
Prevention Plans (Construction SWPPPs)
11-3.1 - General Guidelines
II-2 Construction Stormwater Pollution
a
Prevention Plans (Construction SWPPPs)
II-3.2 -Construction SWPPP Requirements
II-2.4 Preparing Construction SWPPPs
11-3.3 - Step -by -Step Procedure
II-2.4 Preparing Construction SWPPPs
U)
r
II-4 -Best Management Practices Standards and
II-3.1 A Summary of Construction Stormwater
O
i
Specifications
BMPs
Iq
0
N
11-4.1 - Source Control BMPs
II-3.1 A Summary of Construction Stormwater
Y
BMPs
3
BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation
BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation
0
BMP C102: Buffer Zones
BMP C102: Buffer Zones
=
c
BMP C103: High Visibility Fence
BMP C103: High -Visibility Fence
a�
E
BMP C105: Stabilized Construction
Q
Entrance/Exit
BMP C105: Stabilized Construction Access
a�
E
BMP C106: Wheel Wash
BMP C106: Wheel Wash
U
r
r
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocp Packet Pg. 449
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
BMP C107: Construction Road/Parking Area
gMP C107: Construction Road / Parking Area
Stabilization
Stabilization
CU
BMP C120: Temporary and Permanent Seeding
BMP C120: Temporary and Permanent
'
Seeding
M
BMP C121: Mulching
BMP C121: Mulching
00
v
0
BMP C122: Nets and Blankets
BMP C122: Nets and Blankets
w
--
a
BMP C123: Plastic Covering
BMP C123: Plastic Covering
a�
BMP C124: Sodding
BMP C124: Sodding
BMP C125: Topsoiing/Composting
BMP C125: Topsoiling / Composting
CU
L
BMP C126: Polyacrylamide (PAM) for Soil
BMP C126: Polyacrylamide (PAM) for Soil
d
a
3
Erosion Protection
Erosion Protection
E
0
BMP C130: Surface Roughening
BMP C130: Surface Roughening
,0
BMP C131: Gradient Terraces
BMP C131: Gradient Terraces
a�
x
BMP C140: Dust Control
BMP C140: Dust Control
BMP C150: Materials on Hand
BMP C150: Materials on Hand
a
�
BMP C151: Concrete Handling
BMP C151: Concrete Handling
�
BMP C152: Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution
gMP C152: Sawcutting and Surfacing
Prevention]
Pollution Prevention
N
i
BMP C153: Material Delivery, Storage and
gMP C153: Material Delivery, Storage, and
CD
Containment
Containment
N
BMP C154: Concrete Washout Area
gMP C154: Concrete Washout Area
W
0
L
BMP C160: Certified Erosion and Sediment
BMP C160: Certified Erosion and Sediment
�
Control Lead
Control Lead
x
c
a�
BMP C162: Scheduling
BMP C162: Scheduling
r
II-4.2 - Runoff Conveyance and Treatment BMPs
II-3.1 A Summary of Construction Stormwater
w
Q
BMPs
a�
BMP C200: Interceptor Dike and Swale
gMP C200: Interceptor Dike and Swale
BMP C201: Grass -Lined Channels
BMP C201: Grass -Lined Channels
r
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTOIP Packet Pg. 450
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
BMP C202: Channel Lining
BMP C202: Rip rap Channel Lining
BMP C203: Water Bars
BMP C203: Water Bars
CU
�-
BMP C204: Pipe Slope Drains
BMP C204: Pipe Slope Drains
Ci
00
BMP C205: Subsurface Drains
BMP C205: Subsurface Drains
o
�
w
BMP C206: Level Spreader
BMP C206: Level Spreader
o
BMP C207: Check Dams
BMP C207: Check Dams
a
E
BMP C208: Triangular Silt Dike (TSD)
a�
(Geotextile-Encased Check Dam)
BMP C208: Triangular Silt Dike (TSD),
L
BMP C209: Outlet Protection
BMP C209: Outlet Protection
d
E
L
BMP C220: Storm Drain Inlet Protection
BMP C220: Inlet Protection
L
BMP C231: Brush Barrier
BMP C231: Brush Barrier
C
L
BMP C232: Gravel Filter Berm
BMP C232: Gravel Filter Berm
=
BMP C233: Silt Fence
BMP C233: Silt Fence
a
BMP C234: Vegetated Strip
BMP C234: Vegetated Strip
BMP C235: Wattles
BMP C235: Wattles
3:
U)
BMP C236: Vegetative Filtration
BMP C236: Vegetative Filtration
N
BMP C240: Sediment Trap
BMP C240: Sediment Trap
i
-le
0
N
BMP C241: Temporary Sediment Pond
BMP C241: Sediment Pond (Temporary_)
3
BMP C250: Construction Stormwater Chemical
BMP C250: Construction Stormwater
Treatment
Chemical Treatment
x
BMP C251: Construction Stormwater Filtration
BMP C251: Construction Stormwater
Filtration
E
BMP C252: High pH Neutralization Using CO2
BMP C252: Treating and Disposing of High
pH Water
a
BMP C253: pH Control for High pH Water
BMP C252: Treating and Disposing of High
pH Water
Volume II Resource Materials
References
r
r
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTOIP Packet Pg. 451
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 2( 19
SWMMWW
Appendix II -A: Recommended Standard Notes for
Appendix II -A: Recommended Standard
Erosion Control Plans
Notes for Construction SWPPP Drawings
a
Appendix II-B: Background Information on Chemical
BMP C250: Construction Stormwater Chemical
'
Treatment
0
co
Treatment
U
0
U
Volume III Content
w
a)
13
Volume III Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
0
c
a�
III-1 -Introduction
(no content in this section)
0
III-1.1 -Purpose of this Volume
I-1.5 Types of Best Management Practices
CU
.(BMPs) for Stormwater Management
a�
r
III-1.2 - Content and Organization of this Volume
I-1.1 About This Manual
3
E
L
III-1.3 - How to Use this Volume
I-1.1 About This Manual
in
L
C
III-2 - Hydrologic Analysis
III-2.1 An Overview of Hydrologic Analysis
�L
III-2.1 - Minimum Computational Standards
III-2.1 An Overview of Hydrologic Analysis
=
III-2.2 - Western Washington Hydrology Model
III-2.2 Continuous Simulation Models
a
III-2.3 - Single Event Hydrograph Method
III-2.3 Single Event Hydrograph Method
III-2.4 - Closed Depression Analysis
III-2.5 Closed Depression Analysis
III-3 -Flow Control Design
various individual BMPs within Volume V
N
1
III-3.1 -Roof Downspout Controls
V-4.1 Introduction to Roof Downspout BMPs
-le
N
III-3.1.1 - Downspout Full Infiltration Systems
(BMP T5.10A)
BMP T5.10A: Downspout Full Infiltration
3
0
L
III-3.1.2 - Downspout Dispersion Systems (BMP
U
T5.10B)
BMP T5.1013: Downspout Dispersion Systems
=
r
c
a�
III-3.1.3 - Perforated Stub Out Connections
BMP T5.10C: Perforated Stub -out
E
(BMP T5.10C)
Connections
w
a
III-3.2 -Detention Facilities
V-12.1 Introduction to Detention BMPs
III-3.2.1 -Detention Ponds
BMP DA : Detention Ponds
r
r
Q
III-3.2.2 - Detention Tanks
BMP D.2: Detention Tanks
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P Packet Pg. 452
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20
SWMMWW
III-3.2.3 - Detention Vaults
BMP D.3: Detention Vaults
as
III-3.2.4 -Control Structures
V-12.2 Control Structure Design
III-3.2.5 - Other Detention Options
V-12.3 Other Detention Design Options
Ci
r
III-3.3 - Infiltration Facilities for Flow Control and for
o
Treatment
(no content in this section)
U
w
m
III-3.3.1 -Purpose
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
a�
III-3.3.2 -Description
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
III-3.3.3 -Applications
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
L
III-3.3.4 - Steps for the Design of Infiltration
d
3
Facilities - Simplified Approach
V-5.2 Infiltration BMP Design Steps
0
III-3.3.5 - Site Characterization Criteria
V-5.5 Site Characterization Criteria for
Infiltration
0
III-3.3.6 - Design Saturated Hydraulic
V-5.4 Determining the Design Infiltration Rate
�
Conductivity - Guidelines and Criteria
of the Native Soils
=
III-3.3.7 - Site Suitability Criteria (SSC)
V-5.6 Site Suitability Criteria (SSC)
a
V-5.2 Infiltration BMP Design Steps
III-3.3.8 - Steps for Designing Infiltration
and
Facilities - Detailed Approach
a)
V-5.4 Determining the Design Infiltration Rate of
c
the Native Soils
N
r
III-3.3.9 - General Design, Maintenance, and
V-5.3 General Design Criteria for Infiltration
O
Y
Construction Criteria for Infiltration Facilities
BMPs
3
III-3.3.10 -Infiltration Basins
BMP T7.10: Infiltration Basins
U
I
III-3.3.11 -Infiltration Trenches
BMP T7.20: Infiltration Trenches
=
c
a�
III-3.4 - Stormwater-related Site Procedures and
BMP T7.30: Bioretention
Design Guidance for Bioretention and Permeable
and
Q
Pavement
BMP T5.15: Permeable Pavements
as
E
Volume III References
References
o
r
r
Q
Volume III Resource Materials
References
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocp Packet Pg. 453
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
Appendix III -A: Isopluvial Maps for Design Storms
Appendix III-B: Isopluvial Maps for Design
Storms
Appendix III-B: Western Washington Hydrology Model -
CU
Q.
Information, Assumptions, and Computation Steps
III-2.2 Continuous Simulation Models
'
0
M
Appendix III-C: Washington State Department of Ecology
co
Low Impact Development Flow Modeling Guidance
various individual BMPs within Volume V
a
w
aD
0
Volume IV Content
c
aD
Volume IV Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
a,
0
IV-1 -Introduction
(no content in this section)
c
CU
L
d
IV-1.1 -Purpose of this Volume
111-1.1 Choosing Your Source Control BMPs
CU
E
IV-1.2 - Content and Organization of this Volume
I-1.1 About This Manual
in
L
C
IV-1.3 - How to Use this Volume
III-1.1 Choosing Your Source Control BMPs
L
IV-1.4 -Operational and Structural Source Control
1-1.5 Types of Best Management Practices
=
BMPs
for Stormwater Management
.(BMPs)
IV-1.5 - Treatment BMPs for Specific Pollutant
a
Sources
Executive Summary of Volume IV
IV-1.6 - Distinction between Applicable BMPs and
Recommended BMPs
III-1.1 Choosing Your Source Control BMPs
0
N
IV-1.7 - Regulatory Requirements Affecting
1-2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits,
1
Stormwater Pollutant Control
Requirements, and Programs
N
IV-2 - Selection of Operational and Structural Source
3
Control BMPs
III-1.1 Choosing Your Source Control BMPs
o
0
U
IV-2.1 - Applicable (Mandatory) Operational Source
IV-1 Source Control BMPs Applicable to All
=
Control BMPs
Sites
=
m
E
IV-2.2 - Pollutant Source -Specific BMPs
III-1.1 Choosing Your Source Control BMPs
a
w
a
S401 BMPs for the Building, Repair, and
S401 BMPs for the Buildingip Re air, and
Maintenance of Boats and Ships
Maintenance of Boats and Ships
D
S402 BMPs for Commercial Animal Handling
S402 BMPs for Commercial Animal Handling
Q
Areas
Areas
I
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocP Packet Pg. 454
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
S403 BMPs for Commercial Composting
S403 BMPs for Commercial Composting
S404 BMPs for Commercial Printing Operations
S404 BMPs for Commercial Printing
Q
Operations
3
S405 BMPs for Deicing and Anti -Icing
S405 BMPs for Deicing and Anti -Icing
o
Operations - Airports and Streets
Operations for Airports
v
0
S406 BMPs for Streets/Highways
S406 BMPs for Streets and Highways
w
--
a
S407 BMPs for Dust Control at Disturbed Land
U
S407 BMPs for Dust Control at Disturbed
Land Areas and Unpaved Roadways and
°'
E
Areas and Unpaved Roadways and Parking
Lots
Parking Lots
c
S408 BMPs for Dust Control at Manufacturing
S408 BMPs for Dust Control at Manufacturing
Areas
Areas
3
S409 BMPs for Fueling at Dedicated Stations
S409 BMPs for Fueling At Dedicated Stations
o
S410 BMPs for Illicit Connections to Storm
S410 BMPs for Correcting Illicit Discharges to
'0
Drains
Storm Drains
L
CU
S411 BMPs for Landscaping and
S411 BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn /
2
Lawn/Vegetation Management
Vegetation Management
a
S412 BMPs for Loading and Unloading Areas
S412 BMPs for Loading and Unloading Areas
for Liquid or Solid Material
for Liquid or Solid Material
S413 BMPs for Log Sorting and Handling
S413 BMPs for Log Sorting and Handling
S414 BMPs for Maintenance and Repair of
S414 BMPs for Maintenance and Repair of
0
N
and Equipment
Vehicles and Equipment
leVehicles
0
N
S415 BMPs for Maintenance of Public and
S415 BMPs for Maintenance of Public and
ii
Private Utility Corridors and Facilities
Private Utility Corridors and Facilities
N
0
S416 BMPs for Maintenance of Roadside
S416 BMPs for Maintenance of Roadside
L
Ditches
Ditches
=
r
c
as
S417 BMPs for Maintenance of Stormwater
S417 BMPs for Maintenance of Stormwater
E
Drainage and Treatment Systems
Drainage and Treatment Systems
.2
S418 BMPs for Manufacturing Activities -
S418 BMPs for Manufacturing Activities -
a
Outside
Outside
S419 BMPs for Mobile Fueling of Vehicles and
S419 BMPs for Mobile Fueling of Vehicles
r
Q
Heavy Equipment
and Heavy Equipment
ittps://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P
Packet Pg. 455
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 2( 19
SWMMWW
S420 BMPs for Painting/Finishing/Coating of
S420 BMPs for Painting/Finishing/Coating of
Vehicles/Boats/Buildings/Equipment
Vehicles/Boats/Buildings/Equipment
CU
a
S421 BMPs for Parking and Storage of Vehicles
S421 BMPs for Parking and Storage of
M
and Equipment
Vehicles and Equipment
co
U
S422 BMPs for Railroad Yards
S422 BMPs for Railroad Yards
w
S423 BMPs for Recyclers and Scrap Yards
S423 BMPs for Recyclers and Scrap Yards
o
S424 BMPs for Roof/Building Drains at
S424 BMPs for Roof / Building Drains at
E
Manufacturing and Commercial Buildings
Manufacturing and Commercial Buildings
a)
S425 BMPs for Soil Erosion and Sediment
S425 BMPs for Soil Erosion and Sediment
CU
a
Control at Industrial Sites
Control at Industrial Sites
r
3
S426 BMPs for Spills of Oil and Hazardous
S426 BMPs for Spills of Oil and Hazardous
o
Substances
Substances
y
0
S427 BMPs for Storage of Liquid, Food Waste,
S427 BMPs for Storage of Liquid, Food
M
or Dangerous Waste Containers
Waste, or Dangerous Waste Containers
S428 BMPs for Storage of Liquids in Permanent
S428 BMPs for Storage of Liquids in
a
Aboveground Tanks
Permanent Aboveground Tanks
--
S429 BMPs for Storage or Transfer (Outside) of
S429 BMPs for Storage or Transfer (Outside).
Solid Raw Materials, Byproducts, or Finished
of Solid Raw Materials, Byproducts, or
Products
Finished Products
0
S430 BMPs for Urban Streets
S430 BMPs for Urban Streets
N
S431 BMPs for Washing and Steam Cleaning
S431 BMPs for Washing and Steam Cleaning
Y
Vehicles/Equipment/Building Structures
Vehicles / Equipment / Building Structures
3
S432 BMPs for Wood Treatment Areas
S432 BMPs for Wood Treatment Areas
0
U
I
S433 BMPs for Pools, Spas, Hot Tubs, and
S433 BMPs for Pools, Spas, Hot Tubs, and
Fountains
Fountains
Volume IV References
References
r
a
Appendix IV -A: Urban Land Uses and Pollutant
Appendix IV -A: Urban Land Uses and
Generating Sources
Pollutant Generating Sources
0
Appendix IV-B: Stormwater Pollutants and Their Adverse
1-1.4 Stormwater Pollutants and Their
r
Q
Impact
Adverse Impact
ittps://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P
Packet Pg. 456
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
Appendix IV-C: Recycling/Disposal of Vehicle
Outdated / deleted. References to this
Fluids/Other Wastes
appendix are now referred to Ecology's
hazardous waste site.
CU
a
Appendix IV-D: Regulatory Requirements That Impact
I-2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits,
Stormwater Programs g
Requirements, and Programs
o
U
Appendix IV-E: NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permits
1-2 Relationship of This Manual to Permits,
o
Requirements, and Programs
w
Appendix IV-F: Example of an Integrated Pest
S435 BMPs for Pesticides and an Integrated
o
Management Program
Pest Management Program
aD
Appendix IV-G: Recommendations for Management of
Appendix IV-B: Management of Street Waste
Street Wastes
Solids and Liquids
CU
Volume IV Resource Materials - Management of Street?
Wastes
References
E
L
C
v/
Volume V Content
L
0
c
Volume V Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
V-1 -Introduction
(no content in this section)
.0
a
V-1.1 - Purpose of this Volume
Executive Summary of Volume V
V-1.2 - Content and Organization of this Volume
Executive Summary of Volume V
V-1.3 -How to Use this Volume
Executive Summary of Volume V
0
N
V-1.4 - Runoff Treatment Facilities
various BMP group introductions within
i
Volume V
0
V-2 -Treatment Facility Selection Process
111-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
Y
V-2.1 - Step -by -Step Selection Process for
N
Treatment Facilities
111-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
i
V-2.2 -Other Treatment Facility Selection Factors
III-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
a
E
V-3 - Treatment Facility Menus
111-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
a
r
w
V-3.1 - Guide to Applying Menus
111-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
Q
aD
V-3.2 - Oil Control Menu
III-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
E
r
V-3.3 - Phosphorus Treatment Menu
III-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
r
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P Packet Pg. 457
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
V-3.4 - Enhanced Treatment Menu
III-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
a�
V-3.5 -Basic Treatment Menu
III-1.2 Choosing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
V-4 - General Requirements for Stormwater Facilities
V-1 General BMP Design00
Ci
V-4.1 - Design Volume and Flow
III-2.6 Sizing Your Runoff Treatment BMPs
o
U
W
V-4.2 - Sequence of Facilities
V-1.1 Sequence of Runoff Treatment and
Detention BMPs
0
V-4.3 - Setbacks, Slopes, and Embankments
V-1.2 Setbacks, Slopes, and Embankments
a
E
V-4.4 -Facility Liners
V-1.3 Liners and Geotextiles
a�
R
V-4.5 - Hydraulic Structures
V-1.4 Hydraulic Structures
r
V-4.6 - Maintenance Standards for Drainage
E
Facilities
Appendix VA BMP Maintenance Tables
o
L
V-5 - On -Site Stormwater Management
(no content in this section)
0
L
V-5.1 -Purpose
I-1.5 Types of Best Management Practices
.(BMPs) for Stormwater Management
V-5.2 -Application
BMP T5.30: Full Dispersion
a
V-5.3 - Best Management Practices for On -Site
Stormwater Management
various individual BMPs within Volume V
V-5.3.1 - On -Site Stormwater Management
I-3.4.5 MR5: On -Site Stormwater
BMPs
Management
N
i
BMP T5.10A: Downspout Full Infiltration
BMP T5.10A: Downspout Full Infiltration
o
N
BMP T5.10B: Downspout Dispersion
Systems
BMP T5.1013: Downspout Dispersion Systems
y
0
L
BMP T5.10C: Perforated Stub -out
BMP T5.10C: Perforated Stub -out
�
Connections
Connections
c
a�
BMP T5.11: Concentrated Flow Dispersion
BMP T5.11: Concentrated Flow Dispersion
r
BMP T5.12: Sheet Flow Dispersion
BMP T5.12: Sheet Flow Dispersion
w
Q
a
BMP T5.13: Post -Construction Soil Quality
BMP T5.13: Post -Construction Soil Quality_
E
and Depth
and Depth
r
a
BMP T5.14A: Rain Gardens
BMP T5.14: Rain Gardens
I
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/20l9SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocP Packet Pg. 458
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
BMP T5.14B: Bioretention
BMP T7.30: Bioretention
a�
BMP T5.15: Permeable Pavements
BMP T5.15: Permeable Pavements
CU
�-
BMP T5.16: Tree Retention and Tree
M
Planting
BMP T5.16: Tree Retention and Tree Planting
U
BMP T5.17: Vegetated Roofs
BMP T5.17: Vegetated Roofs
w
--
a
BMP T5.18: Reverse Slope Sidewalks
BMP T5.18: Reverse Slope Sidewalks
r-
W
BMP T5.19: Minimal Excavation Foundations
BMP T5.19: Minimal Excavation Foundations
BMP T5.20: Rainwater Harvesting
BMP T5.20: Rainwater HarvestingCU
L
BMP T5.30: Full Dispersion
BMP T5.30: Full Dispersion
d
E
L
V-5.3.2 -Site Design BMPs
V-2.1 Introduction to Site Design BMPs
in
L
BMP T5.40: Preserving Native Vegetation
BMP T5.40: Preserving Native Vegetation
0
L
BMP T5.41: Better Site Design
BMP T5.41: Better Site Design
=
V-6 -Pretreatment
(no content in this section)
a
V-6.1 - Purpose
V-9.1 Introduction to Pretreatment BMPs
V-6.2 -Application
V-9.1 Introduction to Pretreatment BMPs
V-6.3 - Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
c
Pretreatment
V-9.1 Introduction to Pretreatment BMPs
N
i
BMP T6.10: Presettling Basin
BMP T6.10: Presettling Basin
CD
N
V-7 - Infiltration and Bioretention Treatment Facilities
(no content in this section)
N
0
L
V-7.1 -Purpose
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
i
x
V-7.2 -General Considerations
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
E
V-7.3 - Applications
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
w
a
V-7.4 - Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
Infiltration and Bioretention Treatment
V-5.1 Introduction to Infiltration BMPs
E
t
BMP T7.10: Infiltration Basins
BMP T7.10: Infiltration Basins
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTo,P Packet Pg. 459
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
BMP T7.20: Infiltration Trenches
BMP T7.20: Infiltration Trenches
a�
BMP T7.30: Bioretention Cells, Swales, and Planter
Q.
Boxes
BMP T7.30: Bioretention
'
0
M
BMP T7.40: Compost -Amended Vegetated Filter
BMP T7.40: Compost -Amended Vegetated
co
o
Strips (CAVFS)
Filter Strips (CAVES)
w
V-8 -Filtration Treatment Facilities
V-6.1 Introduction to Filtration BMPs
o
V-8.1 - Purpose
V-6.1 Introduction to Filtration BMPs
E
a�
V-8.2 -Description
V-6.1 Introduction to Filtration BMPs
CU
V-8.3 -Performance Objectives
V-6.1 Introduction to Filtration BMPs
r
CU
3
V-8.4 - Applications and Limitations
V-6.1 Introduction to Filtration BMPs
E
0
V-8.5 - Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
c
Sand Filtration
(no content in this section)
c
L
BMP T8.10: Basic Sand Filter Basin
BMP T8.10: Basic Sand Filter Basin
=
BMP T8.11: Large Sand Filter Basin
BMP T8.11: Large Sand Filter Basin
a
BMP T8.20: Sand Filter Vault
BMP T8.20: Sand Filter Vault
BMP T8.30: Linear Sand Filter
BMP T8.30: Linear Sand Filter
BMP T8.40: Media Filter Drain (previously referred
o
to as the Ecology Embankment)
BMP T8.40: Media Filter Drain
N
v
0
V-9 -Biofiltration Treatment Facilities
V-7.1 Introduction to Biofiltration BMPs
Y
V-9.1 -Purpose
V-7.1 Introduction to Biofiltration BMPs
0
L
V-9.2 - Applications
V-7.1 Introduction to Biofiltration BMPs
x
V-9.3 -Site Suitability
V-7.1 Introduction to Biofiltration BMPs
r
a
E
V-9.4 - Best Management Practices
V-7.1 Introduction to Biofiltration BMPs
w
a
BMP T9.10: Basic Biofiltration Swale
BMP T9.10: Basic Biofiltration Swale
a
E
BMP T9.20: Wet Biofiltration Swale
BMP T9.20: Wet Biofiltration Swale
r
r
Q
BMP T9.30: Continuous Inflow Biofiltration Swale
BMP T9.30: Continuous Inflow Biofiltration
Swale
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTOIP Packet Pg. 460
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
BMP T9.40: Basic Filter Strip
BMP T9.40: Vegetated Filter Strip
V-10 -Wetpool Facilities
V-8.1 Introduction to Wetpool BMPs
CU
V-10.1 -Purpose
V-8.1 Introduction to Wetpool BMPs
Ci
co
V-10.2 - Application
V-8.1 Introduction to Wetpool BMPs
o
�
w
V-10.3 - Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
Wetpool Facilities
V-8.1 Introduction to Wetpool BMPs
0
(D
BMP T10.10: Wetponds -Basic and Large
BMP T10.10: Wetponds - Basic and Large
BMP T10.20: Wetvaults
BMP T10.20: WetvaultsCU
L
BMP T10.30: Stormwater Treatment Wetlands
BMP T10.30: Stormwater Treatment
CU
Wetlands
3
E
L
BMP T10.40: Combined Detention and Wetpool
BMP T10.40: Combined Detention and
in
Facilities
Wetpool Facilities
,o
V-11 -Oil and Water Separators
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
L
Separator BMPs
V-11.1 - Purpose of Oil and Water Separators
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
Separator BMPs
V-11.2 - Description
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
a
Separator BMPs
V-11.3 - Performance Objectives
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
Separator BMPs
V-11.4 - Applications/Limitations
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
cn
Separator BMPs
o
V-11.5 - Site Suitability
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
N
Separator BMPs
�
V-11.6 - Design Criteria - General Considerations
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
CD
N
Separator BMPs
Y
V-11.7 - Oil and Water Separator BMPs
V-13.1 Introduction to Oil and Water
3
Separator BMPs
o
L
BMP T11.10: API (Baffle type) Separator Bay
BMP T11.10: API (Baffle type) Separator
x
BMP T11.11: Coalescing Plate (CP) Separator Bay
BMP T11.11: Coalescing Plate (CP)
Separator
V-12 - Emerging Technologies
(no content in this section)
r
w
a
V-12.1 - Background
V-10.1 Introduction to Manufactured
Treatment Devices as BMPs
V-12.2 -Ecology Role in Evaluating Emerging
V-10.3 Approval Process for Manufactured
Technologies
Treatment Devices
Q
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTOIP Packet Pg. 461
5/11/2021 Crosswalk: 2014 - 2019 SWMMWW Dept. of
8.1.h
Location of Content within the 2014 SWMMWW
Location of Content within the 20 19
SWMMWW
V-12.3 - Evaluation of Emerging Technologies
V-10.3 Approval Process for Manufactured
Treatment Devices
V-12.4 - Assessing Levels of Development of
V-10.2 Use Level Designations of
CU
Q.
Emerging Technologies
Manufactured Treatment Devices
3
o
M
V-12.5 -Emerging Technologies for Stormwater
V-10.3 Approval Process for Manufactured
00
o
Treatment and Control Options
Treatment Devices
w
Volume V References
References
o
Appendix V-A: Basic Treatment Receiving Waters
Appendix 111-A: Basic Treatment Receiving
Waters
E
a�
Appendix V-B: Recommended Modifications to ASTM D
2434 When Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity for
BMP T7.30: Bioretention
CU
Bioretention Soil Mixes?
3
Appendix V-C: Geotextile Specifications
V-1.3.4 Geotextile Specifications
o
Appendix V-D: Turbulence and Short -Circuiting Factor
BMP T11.10: API (Baffle type) Separator
°
a�
c
Appendix V-E: Recommended Newly Planted Tree
CU
Species for Flow Control Credit
BMP T5.16: Tree Retention and Tree Planting
=
Washington State Department of Ecology
2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (2019 SWMMWW)
Publication No.19-10-021
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ershare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Crosswalk2014-2019.htm%3FTocP Packet Pg. 462
8.1.i
2022
Stormwater
Management
Code
(ECDC 18,30)
Update
Presented by Zachary Richardson,
Stormwater Engineer
i
0
M
CO
r
U
U
r.,
W
O
O
C
d
L
r
E
L
L
O
2
a
c
0
r
�a
c
a�
y
L
Q_
a'!
a ti
jj
c r
L
U
f4
a
Packet Pg. 463
8.1.i
0
CM
CO
• NPDES Permit with State requires codes to protect surfaces
r
o
water from development which meets or exceeds standards '
prescribed by Ecology. ;
o
Ecology issued 2019 SWMMWW "�` ur-
E !
• Required by July 2022.
• Staff aiming for January 1, 2022
2
• Ecology changes mostly organizational
3
a
Whthe
• Ecology changes summarized in Executive Summary of the 2019 Revision
and Crosswalk: 2014-2019 SWMMWW.
,o
_
v
update?
• City updates ECDC 18.30 to adopt the new manual as modifi
in the Addendum
=
. 66:.�91w
• City makes minor local modifications via the Edmonds Stormwate
o
Addendum (Addendum)
• Some provisions are required by Ecology
N
a
• Some items are optional add-ons for City of Edmonds -
• City provisions cannot be less stringent than Ecology standard and cai
E
5
not be less stringent than previous version (without Ecology approva
a
E
s
c�
Q
Packet Pg. 464
8.1.i
0
CM
CO
r
• Drainage mitigation is required when projects exceed certain U.
thresholds of new plus replaced hard surfaces and/or clearing
limits. o
• Two categories of project
• Category 1 between 2,000 and 5,000 SF hard surfaces
• LID mitigation (MR #5) required for all project in this category
• Aimed at low flow events that cause erosion, not large flows. E
w
• Category 2 larger than 5,000 SF hard surfaces `2
' Flow control (MR #7) over 10,000 SF (or 0.15 cfs increase in 100-year
Drainage
flow
Review 101 Match flows duration of 2-year through 50-year storm to historic condi
Z
Water Quality (MR #6) over 5,000 pollution generating hard surfaces a
(including all vehicle areas) a
• Treat the 2-year flow ("first flush")
• 52 SFRs reviewed CD
a
i
• 24 utilized dispersion or infiltration based BMPs,
• 22 were caught with Edmonds detention requirements Cot erwise
exempt from ECY requirements)
1 direct discharge & 5 perforated pipes a
s
Q
Packet Pg. 465
8.1.i
0
CM
r
U
• Most changes are updates to match Ecology �' W
reorganization and/or to provide clarity where staff o
have experienced commonly missed or misinterpreted !
information by manual users & designers. _
• See 2022 ECDC 18.30 and Stormwater Addendum f
Summary of Changes in agenda packet
�o
• Direction from Ecology (orange) = Ecology prescribed/require N
'°
What's Direction from Staff (White) = Staff -proposed clarification, L
reorganization, or update without substantial change/impaC
Changing?
• Direction from Staff(Green)=Staff-proposed chan a with
g a
potential impacts
o
..
• Department of Commerce and SEPA approval require
prior to formal Council adoption.
Packet Pg. 466
8.1.i
0
M
co
r
U
U
• Old: Current code allows for connection of existing hard W
surfaces on case -by -case basis with a focus on maintaining o
City pipe capacity.
E
Change 1: New: Staff propose revisions to require new connections of
existing hard surfaces to be treated like new hard surfaces °
New requiring full drainage mitigation. w
• Note that this is specific to new connections; where residents E
connections of have an existing connection, they are permitted to replace the 11 ca
L.
connection in -kind without any mitigation requirements. ,0
existing hard Staff Opinion: These new connections of existing surfaces
CD
still new or altered impacts to the City system and any 11
surfaces surfaces water they drain to; they should be mitigated fo
new impacts.
0
• Potential Impacts: This may limit homeowner options w
working on homes without development or expansion.
However, the impacts of allowing every pre -drainage -cod
residence or business to connect to our system would be
continuation of the negative impacts of unmitigated histo
development and detrimental to staff ability to manage the U
capacity of our systems in the future. �a
E
M
Q
Packet Pg. 467
8.1.i
0
M
r
U
U
• Old: Current code recognizes the Edmonds Way
drainage basin as a partial direct discharge basin with., o
reduced requirements for LID (MR #5) and flow contra !
(MR #7)
Change #2.
• New: Staff propose revisions to remove all exemption!
Removing for the Edmonds Way basin, resulting in equal
application of all drainage code requirements to the ,
Edmonds Way as Edmonds Way basin. CLO
a direct • Staff Opinion: The Edmonds Way drainage pipe _
L
(WSDOT) is known to overflow to the Edmonds Mar
dischar e ba s i n. under certain conditions; since this demonstrates a 2
g capacity issue and now discharges to a non-manmad
water body, the direct discharge exemption should n o
longer apply.
N
• Potential Impacts: This simply means that projects CL
within the Edmonds Way basin comply with the exact
same requirement as the rest of the City. C
Packet Pg. 468
8.1.i
0
M
r
• Old: Current code applies the drainage code uniformly to i
areas of City, including the Perrinville Creek Basin. w
• New: Staff propose revisions to increase the retrofit o
requirement for LID and increase the flow control standan
within the Perrinville Creek basin (only).
Change #3 FRetrofit (applies to existing unmitigated surfaces to remain): 25�' � fi
• 50%
Increasing
Flow control: Match 50-year peak => Match 100-year peak (ie. Kii 3
County Level 3 Standard) E
L
ofprotection Staff Opinion. The Perrinville has been beaten up by past2
Perrinville development and needs better protections. The change it T
flow control standard is typical for impacted water ways aen
Creek. the retrofit requirement attempts to rectify some of the p� t
abuses on the creek. Staff believe its fair to ask the reside s
who have directly benefitted from the impacts on the creE
to chip in a little extra towards its recovery.
• Potential Impacts: Flow control will have minimal impacts,
larger projects will have larger detention facilities with
minimal impacts and cost on already large budgets.
However, the retrofit requirement has the potential to
impact homeowners who are not necessarily developing a I
may become cost -limiting to smaller projects in this basin.
U
f4
a
Packet Pg. 469
8.1.i
0
M
r
U
• Old: Current code adopted the Ecology BMP list for MR #5 W
and then added an Edmonds -specific detention BMP to the
end of the list, making its priority less than that of a
perforated pipe connection. V. C.
• New: Staff propose revisions to elevate the Edmonds-specifi
detention BMP to be considered before a perforated pipe
Change #4 connection. M
Staff Opinion: Perforated pipes connection are only used o
Detention when infiltration is already found undesirable for some L
0
reason; because of this fact, they are of very little mitigatior
over benefit and often get proposed in dangerous or undesirablpreferred CD
CD
locations. Staff have run flow comparisons to demonstrat 11
Perforated Pipes that the detention option generates far more desirable
a
decreases in the flow rates for sites this condition would a --
apply to. '
• Potential Impacts: At a minimum detention would be
anticipated in nearly all cases where drainage review is
required. Detention systems may add some cost to:
developing compared to the perforated pipe connections bL cE
will go much further in protecting the City system and U
surfaces waters.-,= a
Packet Pg. 470
8.1.i
What Next?
• SEPA review underway (-60-days)
0
CM
CO
r
U
r �
• Department of Commerce review underway (60-days)
E
• This public hearing
fi, f,�
• Held now to avoid conflicts with budgeting process
• Brought back for formal approval
SEPA approval.
• Questions/concerns:
Zachary. Richardson@e
pending Commerce E
0
CO 1�'
L
0
tM
a
d
E
a
a
Packet Pg. 471
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund Nonprofit Organization Grant Awards
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Community Services
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
The Council -approved Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund includes a $500,000 account to provide for grants to
Edmonds nonprofit organizations.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends consideration of the following grant awards:
Art Start Northwest
Up to $18,000
Cascadia Art Museum
Up to $50,000
Edmonds Center for the Arts
Up to $50,000
Edmonds Driftwood Players
Up to $50,000
Edmonds Waterfront Center
Up to $50,000
Olympic Ballet Theatre
Up to $45,000
Phoenix Theater
Up to $27,500
Rotary Club of Edmonds
Up to $30,000
TOTAL
Up to $320,500
Approval of grant awards at the 9/21/21 Regular meeting.
Narrative
On July 30, 2021 notice of the availability of these grants went out via press release, placement on the
City's website and Facebook page, and direct email to email contacts for arts/culture/civic organizations,
with a deadline to receive applications of 8/20/21 ("Call for Requests" attached).
The following information was requested:
Name of organization, including contact name and details.
Proof of nonprofit status.
Amount requested.
Proposed use of the requested funds.
Packet Pg. 472
9.1
Statement of need. This may include description of financial hardship created by the COVID-19-
induced closures, lockdowns, loss of business and economic down -turn; programmatic or capital
needs; likelihood that the amount requested will help allow the organization to survive into
future years, and any other pertinent, financial/economic-related information.
Other sources of funds available to address the stated need.
Statement of how the organization and its programs, projects and activities enhance economic,
cultural, and/or quality -of -life aspects within the Edmonds community.
Sixteen applications were received. One application (from Washington Kids in Transition) was ineligible
since the organization is not based in Edmonds. Seven of the applications were for amounts of $20,000
or less, which may be approved by the Mayor, per the Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund Ordinance provisions.
Mayor Nelson approved grants for each of the seven eligible organizations for amounts that totaled
$100,000, as follows:
Cascade Symphony
$19,000
DeMiero Jazz Festival
$18,000
Edmonds Boys & Girls Club
$18,000
Sculptors Workshop
$8,000
Sno-King Youth Club
$15,000
Steel Magic Northwest
$14,000
West Edmonds Cooperative Preschool
$8,000
TOTAL
$100,000
The remaining eight applications are available for City Council review and consideration, and are
summarized as follows:
Art Start Northwest
$50,000
Cascadia Art Museum
$50,000
Edmonds Center for the Arts
$50,000
Edmonds Driftwood Players
$50,000
Edmonds Waterfront Center
$50,000
Olympic Ballet Theatre
$45,000
Phoenix Theater
$27,500
Rotary Club of Edmonds
$30,000
TOTAL
$352,500
Packet Pg. 473
9.1
A PDF containing these eight applications is attached.
All of these applications meet eligibility criteria.
One organization, Art Start Northwest, which will be physically housed within the soon -to -open Graphite
complex at 2"d and Main, has included in its application costs for completing construction and
finishings/furnishings for the new building. Art Start's stated mission in its Articles of Incorporation is
"to provide low income individuals interested in pursuing art education with financial assistance." It is
likely a stretch to include these two construction -related items in a grant award. Otherwise, the three
remaining items they have requested ("educational enhancement," "administration expenses," and
"community outreach") for a total of $18,000 appear to comply more closely with the organization's
stated mission and the grant guidelines.
City Council conducted initial review and discussion of these applications at the 9/7/21 Regular Meeting,
indicating their desire to continue review/discussion and make final decisions at the 9/21/21 meeting.
Attachments:
CALL FOR REQUESTS -nonprofits
Non -Profit Grant Applications to Council
Packet Pg. 474
9.1.a
CALL FOR REQUESTS
EDMONDS NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION SUPPORT
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
J U LY 3% 2021
The Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF) was approved by the Edmonds City Council on July 20,
2021 in accordance with the rules and requirements of the American Rescue Plan Act.
One of the accounts created in the ERPF is the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Nonprofit Organization
Support" program that allocates up to $500,000 to assist Edmonds nonprofit organizations that
have suffered substantial financial losses due to prolonged closures, cut -backs, loss of business,
etc.
Edmonds -based nonprofit organizations, serving Edmonds residents, are encouraged to
consider this opportunity to seek one-time grant funding from the ERPF.
Requests for small grants of no more than $20,000 will be reviewed and may be approved by
the Edmonds Mayor.
Requests for large grants of more than $20,000 will be reviewed and may be approved by the
Edmonds City Council.
Requests will be reviewed competitively, with awards based on relative need, likelihood to help
an organization survive, and other sources of funds available, among other considerations.
How to Apply
No application form is necessary. Requests must be made in writing via hard -copy letter, and
any supporting materials (emailed submittals will not be accepted). The application letter must
contain the following:
• Name of organization, including contact name and details.
Packet Pg. 475
9.1.a
• Proof of nonprofit status.
• Amount requested.
• Proposed use of the requested funds.
• Statement of need. This may include description of financial hardship created by the
COVID-19-induced closures, lockdowns, loss of business and economic down -turn;
programmatic or capital needs; likelihood that the amount requested will help allow the
organization to survive into future years, and any other pertinent, financial/economic-
related information.
• Other sources of funds available to address the stated need.
• Statement of how the organization and its programs, projects and activities enhance
economic, cultural, and/or quality -of -life aspects within the Edmonds community.
Address the application letter as follows:
Patrick Doherty
Edmonds City Hall
121 5t" Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Mail or drop off application letter to Edmonds City Hall.
Deadline for Applications
Applications must be postmarked or dropped off by 4:30 pm, Friday, August 20, 2021.
Selection and Follow -Up
For small grant requests, the Mayor's Office will contact requesting parties once decisions have
been made on the grant awards — expected within 2 to 4 weeks of submittal.
Large grant requests will be forwarded to the City Council and their staff for review and
consideration, which will occur during Council meetings (possibly including an initial
committee -level review). A representative of the requesting organization may be asked to offer
remarks regarding their submittal during the public comment period of the Council meeting
when the requests will be reviewed. This process may take four to six weeks.
Information
For further information, you may contact Economic Development/Community Services Director
Patrick Doherty at patrick.doherty@edmondswa.gov or 425-771-0251.
Packet Pg. 476
9.1.b
August 20, 2021
Art Start Northwest
3
Q
Mary Olsen, Executive Director
Mailing Address: 2212nd Ave N. Edmonds WA 98020
425-210-9432
0
ArtStartNorthwest@gmail.com
R
N
R
L
We respectfully submit our request for Edmonds Rescue Plan Nonprofit Organization Support.
0
r
Founded in 2015, Art Start Northwest is the nonprofit entity that will be housed in the new "Graphite"
o
L
Building located at 202 S. Main Street, Edmonds WA.
Our mission to make "art accessible to all" is the culmination of great vision and investment, but has
Z
been delayed due to unforeseen complications of the Covid 19 Pandemic. We reach out to our Edmonds
City Council to assist us in finishing up and getting this newest gem of Edmonds open and available to our
w
community to enjoy soon - and for many years to come.
a
Total Request Amount: $50,000
a�
Statement of Need:
Our request is itemized to include compensation to cover financial losses incurred during construction of
the Graphite building (Item 1) and essentials for the successful launch of programs and services of Art Start
o
Northwest housed within it (Items 2-5). Itemized amounts are as follows:
E
w
1. Financial Challenges of Building During the Pandemic
Our timeline to open the building, and the benefits we are anxious to offer to the community, have been
affected due to the Covid new construction building moratorium in effect from March 2020 to
v
2021. During this lull from preparing the site to start of construction, materials increased in cost due to
issues with availability and breaks in supply chains. Additional time paying taxes and maintaining the site,
U)
c
plus mitigation costs due to health concerns for the workers have all affected our budget projections and
opening timeline.
Q
Increased construction costs due to Covid $20,000
Q
2. Administrative Tools & Workspace
r
c
Although we are nearing the end of the main construction phase of the Graphite Building, the costs to
finish out the infrastructure of the building would be accelerated with additional funding at this time. We
L
a
request funding to finish out capital needs including administrative tools such as computers for reception
o
and office, internet installation, office furniture, and seating for gallery and library. We also still need to
Z
purchase work tables and chairs for studio areas available for public use.
Total Projected Cost $30,000. Requested Amount: $12,000 t
w
r
Q
Packet Pg. 477
9.1.b
3. Educational Enhancement
Projection system for use in presentations to the public, teacher accreditation workshops and other
educational programs.
Total Projected Cost $8,000. Requested Amount: $2,500
4. Administration Expenses
Administrative budget for six months salary towards part-time assistant(s) to help launch workshop
programs, scheduling of events for art walk, gallery shows, lectures, rental of studios and educational
programs, and bookkeeping.
Total Projected Cost $20,000. Requested Amount. $10,000
S. Community Outreach
Community outreach expenses specific to opening the facility to the community. These costs include
design and printing of collateral materials, website and social media, and hosting opening events.
Total Projected Cost $10,000. Requested Amount: $5,500
Sources of funding available to Art Start Northwest
The entire cost of this project has been funded by one individual, Mary Olsen, as a philanthropic endeavor
and an investment in our community. Our request for funding support is a way for the City of Edmonds
to help mitigate the unforeseen additional expenses due to Covid 19, but more importantly to enhance the
successful launch of this important new art center for Edmonds.
Once we are open and accessible, we will be able to move forward with planning fundraisers, grant
writing, approaching donors and other philanthropists. Income from the associated restaurant, studio
rentals and workshop fees will provide a reliable income stream to help support Art Start Northwest.
Why Art Start Northwest & Graphite are important to the community
Art Start Northwest is a non-profit dedicated to enhancing accessibility to the arts in our community. With
a focus on art education in schools, Art Start Northwest has been donating art supplies to local schools for
the past several years.
The non-profit has future plans to utilize Graphite for activities such as school field trips for students,
educational accreditation seminars for teachers, and more. Graphite will be a hub for people of all ages to
experience art at any level. Building features will include:
v Two areas for instruction & workshops a Artist studio spaces
q Flex areas for community events ® Communal public art areas
9 Gallery to display art 0 Library
• Darkroom for photography ■ Restaurant
s Ceramics studio
Graphite will be a welcoming open space for artists and creators of all skill and interest levels. Open to the
public for utilization of the many features, visitors will be encouraged to view the ongoing art endeavors
and public gallery. Graphite will additionally host open studio hours to provide space for artists to work on
their own projects, with private locker storage. Art classes and workshops will be held at Graphite to
further the advancement of art interest within the community.
Packet Pg. 478
"I have a longstanding passion for art and art education, and llook forward to sharing my knowlecl c and
skills with teachers, students, and my community. " -Mary Olsen 3
Q
"The creative process is a uniquely human experience. It culminates in an expression of theinelividual, and
ultimately reflects andguides our culture. Ms place will be a haven, an incubator, and aplace to reaffirm 0
that each person has value and a voice. " - Tracy Felix o
c�
N
"I believe that instilling children with a quality art education is fundamental to their development. We hope
to empower educators in our community do an exceptional job providing art education.. " -james Spangler o
4-
0
L
i
O
Thank you for this opportunity to begin our partnership with the City of Edmonds. Reach out if you z
would like to arrange a visit to the Graphite Building.
c
a_
c
c�
a
as
m
rr
{y �
V 0
O
W
Mary Olsen
Executive Director
c
O
O
U
O
r
N
c
O
r
Jracy ix cOi
Board Member Q-
Q.
Q
c
c�
4-
0
James Spangler a
Board Member o
z
Please find enclosed: Proof of Nonprofit Status 2012 1°
r
a
Packet Pg. 479
9.
STALTES
STATF,� ►�
Ale C*tate of
O�
,�i• ��`l 1839 �tiy ��
.a f.
Secretary of State
I, JUM WYMAN, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue this
CERTIFICATE OF EXISTENCE
OF
ART START NORTHWEST
I CERTIFY that the records on file in this office show that the above named entity was formed under the laws of the State of
Washington and that its public organic record was filed in Washington and became effective on 02/ 13/2015.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that the entity's duration is Perpetual, and that as of the date of this certificate, the records of the
Secretary of State do not reflect that this entity has been dissolved.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that all fees, interest, and penalties owed and collected through the Secretary of State have been paid.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that the most recent annual report has been delivered to the Secretary of State for filing and that
proceedings for administrative dissolution are not pending.
Issued Date: 08/16/2021
UBI Number: 603 477 056
_. .Given under,1 and the Seal of
■it!!!! l:i�l
Olympia, the State Capital
'#Enloal
So f
rrr■- .!r!i F
1!�!!! �!lii
�m!l:iir 7III�i�
one �!!
■�'� v■Kim Wyman, Secretary of State
..�Date Issued:08/16/2021
Packet Pg. 480
&o 3 4rn DSt
9.1.b
State of Washington
Secretary of State
CORPORATIONS DIVISION
James M. Dolliver Building
801 Capitol Way South
PO Box 40234
Olympia WA 98504-0234
360,725,0377
Application ID
Tracking ID
Validation ID
Date Submitted for Filing:
Contact Name
Contact Address
Contact Email
Contact Phone
FILED
FEB 13 2015
WA SECRETARY OF STATE
NonProfit Corporation
Office Information
3260939
2912594
2821850-001
1/14/2015
Contact Information
Tracy Felix
71 Pine St
4201
Edmonds
WA
98020
frakerart@gmail.com
425-770-4658
Articles of Incorporation
02/13115 2844302-
001
$0.00 D
tid.2912594
Preferred Name ART START NORTHWEST
Alternate Name 1
Alternate Name 2 t
Purpose To provide low income individuals interested in pursuing art education with
financial assistance.
Duration Perpetual
Packet Pg. 481
9.1.b
Incorporation Date Effective Upon Filing by the Secretary of State
Expiration Date 1/31/2016
Distribution of Assets In the event of voluntary dissolution all net assets will be distributed to the
Edmonds Art Festival Foundation, a registered 501 (c) 3 nonprofit
corporation.
Registered Agent Information
Agent is Individual
Agent Name Tracy Felix
Agent Street Address 71 Pine St
#201
#201
Edmonds
WA
98020
Agent Mailing Address Same as Street Address
Agent Email Address frakerart@gmail.com
Submitter/Agent Submitter is Registered Agent
Relationship
Initial Directors Information
Director #1
Director Name James Spangler
Title Director
Director Address 71 Pine St
#201
Edmonds
WA
98020
Director #2
Director Name Tracy Felix
Title Chairman
Packet Pg. 482
9.1.b
Director Address 71 Pine St
#201
Edmonds
WA
98020
Director 43
Director Name Mary Olsen
Title Director
Director Address 221 2nd Ave N
Edmonds
WA
WA
98020
Incorporators Information
Incorporator #1
Incorporator Name Tracy Felix
Incorporator Address 71 Pine St
#201
Edmonds
WA
98020
Signature Information
Signed By
Packet Pg. 483
-. - -
r
-
ri��
i
WN
-.i - +
q
ill
+... f
I r _ 'V'` ■� 1 1
- {
_
'� I� I � �� - - � 1i - _'1 ��- . L .-. - 1�' �I + "✓-'- 1
'�r 1 1• I I I
u �Ti
-i■
yr
1.
y.
1 -
Corporations and Charities Filing
Order (fertified Copies and
System p
Navigation Certificates
My Dashboard -r! Welcome! MARY U Logout
Please review the information below and
select as appropriate to complete your
Order Certificates/Certified certified copies/certificate request.
Copies
BUSINESS INFORMATION
Express PDF Certificate of Exist...
Certified Copies/Certificates Business Name:
ART START NORTHWEST
Business Search
UBI Number:
Charities Search 603 477 056
Trademark Search Business Type:
WA NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Create or Register a Business
Business Status:
Business Maintenance Filings .. ACTIVE
Reactivate a Business Principal Office Street Address:
221 2ND AVE N, EDMONDS, WA,
Charities Filings 98020-3103, UNITED STATES
Principal Office Mailing Address:
Account Preferences
221 2ND AVE N. EDMONDS, WA,
(� Logout 98020-3103, UNITED STATES
Expiration Date:
02/28/2022
Jurisdiction:
UNITED STATES, WASHINGTON
Formation/Registration Date:
02/13/2015
https://ccfs.sos.wa.gov/#/CopyRequest/41132 8/24/21, 09:48
Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg. 485
9.1.b
PERPETUAL
Period of Duration:
Inactive Date:
Nature of Business:
CHARITABLE, EDUCATIONAL
RETURN ADDRESS FOR
THIS REQUEST
Note: Provide the mailing address
information for this request. The
requested records/certificates will be
mailed to this address.
TRACY FELIX
Attention:*
Email:*
ARTSTARTNORTHWEST@GMAIL.0
Confirm Email:*
ARTSTARTN O RTH W EST@G MAI L.0
UNITED STATES
1028 4TH AVE S
Country:*
Address 1:*
Address 2:
https://ccfs.sos.wa.gov/#/CopyRequest/41132 8/24/21, 09:48
Page 2 of 4
Packet Pg. 486
9.1.b
Zip:
City:
EDMONDS
State
WASH I NGTON
RECORDS / CERTIFICATE
REQUEST
Note: If you have any questions
or would like a certified copy of
all documents on file, please
email our office at
recordsdesk@sos.wa.gov
(ma iIto: recordsdesk@sos.wa.gov)
prior to submitting your order.
Filing Records/Certificates
Date
CERTIFICATE OF FACT (Provi
Name/Description of the CE
requesting)
(500 character limit)
CERTIFICATE OF EXISTENCE
(Certificate of complete filir
https://ccfs.sos.wa.gov/#/CopyRequest/41132 8/24/21, 09:48
Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 487
CERTIFICATE OF EXISTENCE
(Certificate of active status/
WA state)
DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION/FORMATI,
(Commemorative certificat(
upon forming in WA State)
07/09/2021 REINSTATEMENT
07/03/2021 ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUT
01/09/2020 ANNUAL REPORT
01/28/2019 ANNUAL REPORT
02/26/2018 ANNUAL REPORT
03/27/2017 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
02/27/2017 ANNUAL REPORT
02/17/2016 ANNUAL REPORT
02/13/2015 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATI
Back
Save Close Continue
https://ccfs.sos.wa.gov/#/CopyRequest/41132 8/24/21, 09:48
Page 4 of 4
Packet Pg. 488
9.1.b
Cascadia
Art Museum
August 18, 2021
Patrick Doherty
Economic Development/Community Services Director
Edmonds City Hall
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Patrick,
The overall health of any society is affected by civic engagement, social tolerance, and social connection.
Access to the arts from the youngest to the eldest in our community can enhance these aspects of a
thriving society. The greater Edmonds community needs access to the arts that is inclusive, equitable,
and representative of the population. Cascadia Art Museum (Cascadia) in Edmonds, WA, is committed to
providing broad access to artistic excellence that is inclusive, equitable, and representative of our
population. We intend for this to result in a vibrant quality of life for the entire Edmonds community
and beyond.
Cascadia was founded in 2015 and celebrates the rich tradition of visual arts and design in the
Northwest from the mid-1800s through mid-1900s. The museum seeks to reassess the hierarchy of
traditional art history by regularly including the work of women and minority artists who made
substantial contributions to the region's cultural identity.
Prior to COVID-19, Cascadia was emerging from a start-up phase, and growing its audience to serve over
13,000 visitors per year. The repeated closures and health concerns resulting from COVID-19 halted
Cascadia's momentum and threatens the financial stability of the museum. With strong community
support and a dedicated small staff, Cascadia is gradually recovering from the effects of the
pandemic. However, the areas that contribute to earned income - weekly attendance, program
participation, membership, and volunteer support — are significantly less than in previous years.
In addition, the museum's primary fundraiser, the Summer Stars Gala & Auction, struggled to provide
needed revenue during 2020 and 2021. The Summer Stars Gala & Auction pivoted to a virtual platform
in 2020 raising $15,000 less than the 2020 budgeted amount. This year, the Summer Stars Gala &
Auction is returning to an in -person outdoor format. However, with the new concern over the Delta
variant, ticket sales for this event are at 60% of our goal. The financial impact of the pandemic as seen in
the decrease of earned and contributed income is limiting the museum's capacity to provide inclusive
and representative art access to our community.
Packet Pg. 489
To provide financial stability and enable Cascadia to continue fulfilling its mission, we are requesting a
grant of $50,000 for general operating support from the City of Edmonds. General operating support
would specifically assist Cascadia in:
1) Rebuilding our audience
2) Increasing staff capacity
3) Continue to implement exhibitions, publications, and educational programs Page Break
Rebuilding Our Audience
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, Cascadia was closed to the public for nine months from March 2020
through September 2020 and November 2020 through January 2021. Even when we were able to
reopen and welcome visitors back in -person, our admission and membership numbers have been at 40%
of our pre -pandemic totals due to people's safety concerns and state restrictions. The concerns and
restrictions have also impacted our program revenue, as our in -person revenue -generating programs
have either been on hiatus or are limited because of in -person attendance restrictions.
To rebuild our local Edmonds audience while also attracting visitors from the greater Northwest region,
Cascadia will be broadening its paid marketing strategies to include tv, radio, social media, and print
advertisements. Front desk personnel will inquire how visitors heard about Cascadia to track the
effectiveness of the marketing campaign.
Increasing Staff Capacity
Cascadia has thrived because of the dedicated service of more than 75 volunteers. These team members
have given more than 35,000 hours (about 4 years) of their time since 2015, the equivalent of more than
$525,000 of labor if valued at minimum wage. As Gallery Attendants and Store Attendants, this group is
essential to keeping the museum operating and open to the public. However, many volunteers have
been reticent to return to Cascadia due to personal health concerns.
To protect our volunteers' health, we intend to increase our Store Administrator's hours to include all
opening hours of the museum. Currently, we do not have the funds to make this change. By increasing
the Store Administrator's hours to cover all opening hours of the Museum, we can ensure that Cascadia
is able to remain open to the public while not jeopardizing our volunteers' health.
Continue Implementing Exhibitions, Publications, and Educational Programs
With the renewal of financial stability, Cascadia can continue providing inclusive and equitable access to
Northwest art and design that is representative of our population. We will achieve this by:
implementing at least three exhibitions and one publication per year featuring female,
minority, and/or underrepresented artists
• generating original scholarship about Northwest art through one publication per year,
• providing informal integrated arts education and engagement to children and adults in a
welcoming environment through educational programming.
Packet Pg. 490
In Fall 2021, Cascadia will publish a book and present an accompanying exhibition called Kenjiro
Nomura, American Modernist: An Issei Artist's Journey. The publication written by art historian Barbara
Johns, PhD and the exhibition curated by David Martin, features the art and story of one of the foremost
Japanese American artists, Kenjiro Nomura (1896-1956). It is Cascadia's fifth publication ensuring
Northwest artists who dramatically impacted our society are not forgotten.
Cascadia's educational programs include the new Cascadia Art for Schools program which launched
virtually in 2020 providing over 1,000 students in the Edmonds School District with an integrated arts
curriculum. With a focus on arts access for all ages, our educational programs serve not only a diverse
group of students, but also adults and seniors including a program for patients living with Alzheimer's
and their caregivers.
Community Benefit & Additional Funding
As a museum dedicated to its community, inclusive access to the arts for everyone is our highest
priority. Through our exhibitions and programming, we are making a difference in the Edmonds
community by fostering empathy and social tolerance, decreasing social isolation, specifically in our
senior population, and contributing to the health and well-being of our community.
Cascadia is requesting additional funding from the National Endowment for the Arts and the Hazel Miller
Foundation for general operating support. Together with a generous grant from the City of Edmonds, we
can continue providing inclusive and equitable access to Northwest art and design for our Edmonds
community and beyond.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further information. Thank you for your generous
time and consideration, and for all that you do for our Edmonds community.
Sincerely,
\3ZeVS+7U
Sally Ralston
Interim Executive Director
Cascadia Art Museum
sally@cascadiaartmuseum.org
425-678-6533
Enclosure: IRS 501(c)(3) Letter of Acceptance
Packet Pg. 491
r
a
Packet Pg. 492
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
P. O. BOX 2508
CINCINNATI, OH 45201
Date :APR 10 2015
CASCADIA ART MUSEUM
C/O WALTER Q IMPERT
701 FIFTH AVE STE 6100
SEATTLE, WA 98104
Dear Applicant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Employer Identification Number:
47-2733144
DLN:
17053027369025
Contact Person:
TERRY IZUMI ID# 95048
Contact Telephone Number:
(877) 829-5500
Accounting Period Ending:
December 31
Public Charity Status:
509 (a) (2)
Form 990 Required:
Yes
Effective Date of Exemption:
October 8, 2014
Contribution Deductibility:
Yes
Addendum Applies:
NO
We are pleased to inform you that upon review of your application for tax
exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax
under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to you are
deductible under section 170 of the Code. You are also qualified to receive
tax deductible bequests, devises, transfers or gifts under section 2055, 2106
or 2522 of the Code. Because this letter could help resolve any questions
regarding your exempt status, you should keep it in your permanent records.
Organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code are further classified
as either public charities or private foundations. we determined that you are
a public charity under the Code section(s) listed in the heading of this
letter.
For important information about your responsibilities as a tax-exempt
organization, go to www.irs.gov/charities. Enter 114221-PC" in the search bar
to view Publication 4221-PC, Compliance Guide for 501(c)(3) Public Charities,
which describes your recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements.
Letter 947
Packet Pg. 493
9.1.b
NOZ
CASCADIA ART MUSEUM
We have gent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your
power of attorney.
Sincerely,
Z a a �Iv
Director, Exempt Organizations
Letter 947
Packet Pg. 494
9.1.b
Edmonds
Players
August 18, 2021
Patrick Doherty
Economic Development/Community Services Director
Edmonds City Hall
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Patrick:
Thank you to you and the Edmonds City Council for the opportunity to apply for nonprofit
organization support as part of the Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF) program.
Edmonds Driftwood Players (EDP) is a volunteer -based, 501(c)(3) nonprofit community theatre
that has been serving Edmonds residents by entertaining, enriching, and engaging the Edmonds
community since 1958, making it one of the oldest continually operating community theatres in
Washington State. In recent years, the high quality of EDP's live theatre productions has been
recognized statewide as "People's Choice Theatre of the Year" by The Gregory Awards,
"Theatre of the Year" and "Best Musical" by Broadway World, and recipient of the "Betty Wills
Washington Treasure Award" from the Washington State Community Theatre Association. EDP
has also been a part of Washington State's first Certified Creative District with the City of
Edmonds since November 2018.
On March 6, 2020, EDP was one of the first theatres in our area to cancel our performances out
of an abundance of caution for the health of our community. As a result of the COVID-19 health
emergency, EDP, like many other performing arts organizations, has suffered substantial
financial loss due to the prolonged closures of our theatre, productions, programs, and services.
Unlike other businesses, live theatre requires a longer lead time to get back up and running once
city, county, and state health permitted reopening and EDP has delayed the start of our 63`d
season from September to November of this year, which will open with our annual holiday-
themed show. We are requesting assistance through the ERPF program to help offset the
financial loss incurred over the past 17 months and help ensure that EDP survives to continue to
be a vibrant and vital presence in Edmonds for another 63 years.
The requested information to complete and submit our application is included on the following
pages.
PO Box 385, Edmonds, WA 98020 - (425) 774-9600 - office@edmondsdriftwoodplayers.org
Packet Pg. 495
9.1.b
Name of organization, including contact name and details:
■ Edmonds Driftwood Players
PO Box, Edmonds, WA 98020
Katie Soule, Managing Director
office@edmondsdriftwoodplayers.org
(425) 774-9600
Proof of nonprofit status:
■ Attached IRS determination letter dated June 24, 1965, and confirmed March 28, 2012.
Amount requested:
■ $50,000.00
Proposed use of the requested funds:
• Generally, this funding will help EDP regain some financial stability after its closure and
loss of revenue due to the COVID-19 health emergency from March 2020-present.
• Specifically, EDP first needs to re-hire/hire its minimal part-time staff of five employees
to ensure a smooth and compliant theatre operation. The cost of this alone for six months
is approximately $50,000.00.
• Secondly, funding will assist EDP to purchase supplies and equipment and train staff and
volunteers on required health and safety procedures to reopen safely for the Edmonds
community this November for its 63rd season of physically and financially accessible
productions, programs, and services.
■ Finally, any additional funding awarded can be used to defray the cost of the unexpected
and COVID-related safety repairs to the theatre facility detailed below.
Statement of need:
■ Over the past 17 months, as a result of the COVID-19 health emergency, EDP has been
unable to deliver its mission and suffered substantial financial loss due to the prolonged
closures of our theatre, productions, programs, and services. EDP's revenue from its
productions, programs, and services for the fiscal year September 1, 2019-August 31,
2020, dropped by approximately 35% compared to the prior fiscal year, and then
plummeted by approximately 100% for the fiscal year September 1, 2020-August 31,
2021, as detailed below.
o FY2018 (September 1, 2018-August 31, 2019): $326,887.00 (No closure)
o FY2019 (September 1, 2019-August 31, 2020): $213,355.00 (Partial closure)
o FY2020 (September 1, 2020-August 19, 2021): $ 850.00 (Full closure FYTD)
C
Packet Pg. 496
9.1.b
* Although the theatre was closed, this did not deter unforeseen maintenance issues from
arising in our facilities, including:
o A COz leak in the theatre's heating system was discovered during a routine
scheduled maintenance which resulted in the removal of old furnaces and
installation and replacement of our lobby at the cost of just under $10,000.00.
o While the work above was required, it was cost-effective to complete additional
upgrades to the ductwork for the health and safety of the Edmonds community at
the same time. At the additional cost of approximately $4,000.00, EDP upgraded
the theatre's air filtration system with three Aerus ActivePure Technology Air
Purifier "air scrubbers" which provides 99.98% SARS-CoV-2 air and surface
reduction rate and added duct transfers to provide heating to the two lobby
bathrooms which are used by patrons.
o A water leak on the east side of the theatre where water collected and seeped into
the concrete foundation, causing damage to interior flooring, which will likely
require a French drain in the near future.
• During this time, while revenue declined, most of EDP's operating expenses remained.
EDP took its financial stewardship of the organization very seriously and performed
many cost-cutting and fundraising measures to help offset some of the impact of the
immediate loss of revenue and to ensure the organization's survival into future years,
including, but not limited to:
o Laying off employees and reducing employee hours.
o Consolidating physical locations from three to two, eliminating EDP's
administrative office with box office and rehearsal space, resulting in a cost
savings of approximately $36,000.00 per year. However, this also requires
significant changes to how and where our employees work together and how we
deliver services to our patrons, with costs associated to the creation, technology,
and communication of the new processes.
o Engaging volunteers and professional services willing to donate their time and
expertise to move, organize, and repair facilities to accommodate the loss of
office space.
o Applying for city, county, state, federal, and other COVID-19 programs and
grants where EDP met eligibility.
o Creating and promoting online content as avenues for entertainment and
donations.
o Participating in GiveBIG, a statewide fundraising campaign.
o Communicating with our patrons, sponsors, and volunteers through newsletters
and email campaigns to encourage engagement and donations.
Packet Pg. 497
9.1.b
Other sources of funds available to address the stated need:
■ EDP has been granted and utilized other sources of funds, such as first and second round
Paycheck Protection Program Loans through the US Small Business Administration to
maintain our staff of five part-time employees for an eight -week period from April -June
2020 and an additional eight -week period from March -May 2021, a $1,000 grant through
the Edmonds Chamber Foundation to assist with website updates for enhanced
communication options, the divestment of a recently created endowment to pay for
ongoing operating expenses, and a $20,000.00 Nonprofit Community Recovery (NCR)
grant received in June which was awarded to cover expenses incurred between March 1,
2020, and June 30, 2021, due to financial hardship caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
■ EDP continues to apply for city, county, state, federal, and other COVID-19 programs
and grants where EDP meets eligibility.
Statement of how the organization and its programs, projects and activities enhance
economic, cultural, and/or quality -of -life aspects within the Edmonds community:
• EDP's mission to entertain, enrich, and engage the community serves to enhance
economic, cultural, and quality -of -life in Edmonds through our productions, outreach and
education programs, and volunteer opportunities.
• EDP representatives and volunteers participate in events and committees which support
the greater Edmonds community, such as Anabel Hovig, former Board President who
now serves on the Creative District Steering Committee.
• EDP productions highlight diverse stories, so that patrons may both see themselves
reflected on stage and experience perspectives other than their own, including women,
people of color, and the LGBTQ+ community. Examples of past shows include: To Kill A
Mockingbird, Silent Sky (featuring pioneering female astronomers), [MISS] (a story about
first female doctor to work for the FDA), and Proposals (told from the point of view of
an African American woman). We have invested in making our theatre space accessible,
including reserving an entire row of seating to accommodate patrons who use
wheelchairs, walkers, etc. We also have installed a hearing loop system to work with
assistive hearing devices, as well as designated American Sign Language interpreted
performances.
• During the summer months, EDP's education programs connect students with instructors
and material that instills passion, teaches skills, and builds confidence to pursue
opportunities in the arts and in life. The programs typically serve students ages 6-21 years
old.
• Annually, EDP offers two long-standing scholarships to deserving students interested in
pursuing theatre education that may be used toward tuition at any college, university, or
technical school in the United States. The Theatre Arts Scholarship is an EDP tradition
since 1988 and the Ralph Eaton Technical Theatre Scholarship was established in 2011
by the family of Ralph Eaton, a beloved, long-time volunteer and friend to the theatre.
4]
Packet Pg. 498
9.1.b
• EDP supports the local Edmonds and King and Snohomish County school theatre
departments and other performing arts and nonprofit organizations loaning stage props,
furniture, and costuming to enhance their educational productions.
• Since 2012, EDP has partnered with county shelters and transitional housing facilities to
bring their communities into the theatre for a chance to "feed" their souls. Our program,
Take A Kid to the Theatre, serves youths and their families who are experiencing housing
insecurity in Snohomish County by providing opportunities to attend our live
performances and education programs at no cost to them. The program includes
transportation, meals, and any supplies needed to participate in these experiences.
• EDP's volunteer program is open to anyone aged 12 and above. Most of our volunteers
are aged 55+ and participate in theatre life between 3-60+ hours per month. EDP
provides structured opportunities year-round in the form of social engagement,
committees, and theatre leadership. Our most senior volunteers have provided EDP with
expertise from their work and life experience that has proven invaluable. One of them, at
age 94, is an active member of our play selection and education committee, bringing a
wealth of knowledge to these areas. Another, aged 73, builds sets and helps organize the
process of loaning set pieces to theatres and schools. Others venture out into nearby cities
to introduce EDP, develop connections, and distribute posters. While part of our mission
is to enrich the community, these volunteers have enriched all of us, both personally and
professionally.
Thank you, again, for the opportunity, and your time and consideration of our application for
nonprofit organization support as part of the Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF) program.
Edmonds Driftwood Players' heart and history is in Edmonds, and we look forward to
supporting each other and rebuilding toward a bright future together.
Sincerely,
Katie Soule
Managing Director
C�
Packet Pg. 499
9.1.b
Attachments:
U
S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
lily W0 DEECFGN
lMTN AND LEMORA OU160ING
!£ATTLE. ilA$N IRGTON — M0r �,oy�+To
Form L.1 0
Cade 4L4.-'-O:
::3r :6L:
NIRPWZ
alitfG31i�.Q,.
! ADON[IIa F"cuIR wo A FILe RETINIRs inTM
I a{StRIET DIRECTOR OF INTt7IMAL REVENW£
Junq 211_, 1 -3651
• 4�.,aids Orr ftwood ?layer--, Inc.
ICO'15 !Friar Tuck Lore
26ncnds, 7non.on sh Goant7, :ash
3eiitleran:
Seattle, Ala-- +Ingtep
po" "Q-A R;- cGWRTIM4 tEA106
QWWW ,:Kogmri
Yarch 31
Con tha txmis of your stated pies arxi the unndeistaedtng that your operations Nell cmi?zue 31
evdenCmd to date or will confonr to the proposed in pow tultrq Wlimuon. we have crrciuded
that you arc exempt from Federal in=mw Pax as an erganizaUon described in se.uon 501(c);3) cf
the Internal Revenue Code. Any charm in oplsntion fraie theme descihed, ar in your chore='ter
ar purposes, must be reported in T*diataiy to yom Dimrief]irec!ne for concxierotion of -I*,: affect
Von you exeriyt BMWs- You must also report any cinnge m your =w* or c= d zs.
You are nct mWired to file Federal incam tar redone so lorq as you [eta in an exempt s tatus. um -
less you are subject to the tax or unrelated business uicow imposed Ly secion 511 of the Code,
in which event you are regwed to file Face: 99D-T. Cla detetmxnatlen as to your liability for
lllitig ibe annual udonaat on rettra. Farm 990-A. is set for_h aim*. That return, if required, must
be filed as or before the 15th day of the fifth month after the claw of your annual occnunt:nq pe:ind
indicated above.
CantrIbuiivns meld* to you are dwuctible by donors as provided in section EM of the Code. Be. j
quests, kgacies, dwims, tronsfgrs or gifts to or for your toe are deductible forFwkrvl estate j[
and gift tax purposas under t'te provtsians Of section 2055, 2106 and 2522 a8 the Cade.
You arc not fiabl4 far the taxes unposed utaer the Federal Listrance Coetribuuans Act (social
security taxes] unless you file a r+atwer of exemption certificate as provided in sucft act- You are
not ifable for the tax imposed under -J.e Federvi Urrea4ayment Tax Am i1gLL'tes about the wai:rr
of exemption cartifi=te for social security taxes should be addressed to this office, its shrub any
questions concerning excise. emplcpr ent or other Federal taxes,
This is o detvrmfrution letter.
Very truly ya¢s.
N-,^_�l �, h4rJ3rPf
D.-said Diracr:,r
•
Packet Pg. 500
IIRS�Q51f11R4Reve s Tf+Mcr
�lfElMal H!T!\�! �iEl7�if
P.D. Box 2508, Room 4010
Cincinnati OH 45201
In reply refer to: 4077550279
Mar. 20, 2012 LTR 4168C 0
91-6060943 000000 00
00032062
BODC: TE
EDMONDS DRIFTWOOD PLAYERS INC
SNOHOMISH COUNTY ,,
PO BOX 385 aC T III- IT jq
EDMOHDS WA 98020-0385 1
OL9160
Employer Identification Number: 91-6060943
Person to Contact: Sophia Brown O
Tall Free Telephone Number: 1-877-829-5500
Dear Taxpayer:
This is in response to your Feb. 10, 2012, request for information
regarding your tax-exempt status.
Our records Indicate that you were recognized as exempt under
section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code in a determination
letter issued in June 1965.
Our records also indicate that you are not a private foundation within
the meaning of section 509(8) of the Code because you are described in
section 509(a)(2).
Donors may deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of
the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or
for your use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax Purposes
if they meet the applicable provisions of sections 2055, 2106, and
2522 of the Code.
Please refer to our website www.irs.gov/ea for information regarding
filing requirements. Specifically, section 6033(j) of the Code
provides that failure to file an annual information return for three
consecutive years results in revocation of tax-exempt status as of
the filing due date of the third return for organizations required to
file. We will publish a list of organizations whose tax-exempt
status was revoked under section 60330) of the Code on our website
beginning in early 2011.
r,
Packet Pg. 501
9.1.b
Oe'-
edmonds center for the arts
Patrick Doherty
Edmonds City Hall
121511 Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Patrick,
August 20, 2021
On behalf of the members of the Board of Directors and Staff of Edmonds Center for the Arts
(ECA), we extend our deepest appreciation for the opportunity to submit this request for
support from the Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF). We want to thank the City of Edmonds for
including in the ERPF a fund specifically designated to help address the needs of the non-profit
sector as we seek to rebuild and fully restore our service to the community. Any investment
the City can make in its non-profit businesses and partners to help us recover will, in turn, be an
investment in the citizens of Edmonds who rely upon non-profit organizations to help meet
their needs and improve the overall security, health, education, and quality of life in our
community.
When the "Stay Home, Stay Healthy" order was issued by the Governor's Office in March 2020,
organizations like ECA that are specifically designed to gather people in person for live
performance and communal experiences were instantly unable to operate. In our reduced
capacity since then, we found ways to offer a limited number of livestreamed events, and a few
in -person performances by local artists outdoors for senior living facilities through our
"Window to the Arts" program. But these programs could never generate sufficient revenue to
meet the financial needs of the organization, and the facility we are responsible to preserve.
ECA humbly requests a grant in the amount of $50,000 from the ERPF to aid in our recovery
from the financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to support our efforts as we rebuild
our team and prepare to reopen safely and successfully in the coming months.
In total, ECA has lost an estimated $2.25 Million in gross revenue since our venue was shuttered
18 months ago. Through a combination of extensive cuts in operating expenses, layoffs and
50% reductions in pay for remaining ECA personnel, and financial contributions from the
Packet Pg. 502
private sector, we were able to hold our net operating loss during this period to just over $1
Million. In addition to our request for support from the ERPF, ECA applied for and recently
received a grant from the Shuttered Venue Operator Grant program (a program of the CARES
Act) administered in July. This grant in the amount of $710,000 will provide a strong base for
our organization's recovery. But additional support will still be needed in the weeks and
months ahead to help offset ECA's extraordinary financial losses and to help us rebuild and
restart our programs, services, and operations.
Funds received from the ERPF will be directly invested in the personnel, equipment and
supplies we need to bring our venue back online and back to life. A grant from the City of
Edmonds will help ensure that we are fully operational and prepared for major events that are
scheduled to take place in September, October, and November. A strong start to our 2021-
2022 Season will help spark a complete recovery and long-term financial stability for ECA. It will
allow us to continue to steward and maintain the original Edmonds High School campus, bring
artists from around the world back to the ECA stage, serve again as a home for events,
performances and celebrations by countless local and regional groups, and attract audiences
from throughout the Puget Sound region and beyond. At full operation, ECA has grown to
serve 90,000 people each year with presentations, rental events, and impactful education and
outreach programs. We can't wait to get back to that level of service.
Thank you for taking our unique circumstances into consideration and for exploring the
possibility of providing financial assistance to ECA, one of the City's essential cultural assets.
We are grateful for your time, and for all you do to steward the resources and the quality of life
in our city and our community.
Sincerely,
Iseph Mclalwain
Executive Director
Edmonds Center for the Arts
410 4th Ave N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
206-293-5209 (mobile)
www.ec4arts.org
Packet Pg. 503
JUN j
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division
I� PO Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201
EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS
410 FOURTH AVE NORTH
EDMONDS, WA 98020-3119
Dear Applicant:
Date:
Employer ID number:-
74-3089412
Person to contact:
Valerie Bishop ID #41001
Contact telephone number:
651-361-1591
Form 990/990EZ/990-N required:
Yes
In your letter dated July 30, 2018, you requested a reclassification of foundation status as a public
charity.
Our records indicate you are tax exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3). You're currently classified as a public
charity described in IRC Sections 509(a)(3).
Based on the information you provided, we determined you meet the requirements for classification as a public
charity described in IRC Sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and updated our records.
Because your tax-exempt status wasn't under consideration, you continue to be classified as an organization
exempt from federal income tax under IRC Section 501(c)(3).
For important information about your responsibilities as a tax-exempt organization, go to www.irs.gov/charities.
Enter "4421-PC" in the search bar to view Publication 4421-PC, Compliance Guide for 501(c)(3) Public
Charities, which describes your recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements.
This letter could help resolve questions on your foundation status. Keep it for your records.
Sincerely,
e_A:5)A0Wft ot, - AYANC
Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations Rulings and
Agreements
Letter4425 (Rev. 1-2016)
Catalog Number52256W
Packet Pg. 504
EDMONDS
Waterfront Center
Connecting & Enriching Our Community
August 12, 2021
Patrick Doherty
Edmonds City Hall
121 5th Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund — Nonprofit Support
Dear Patrick,
On behalf of the Edmonds Senior Center please accept this request for nonprofit support from
the Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund.
Organization Name: Edmonds Senior Center, DBA Edmonds Waterfront Center
Contact: Daniel Johnson, CEO, (206) 293-4823; daniel.iohnson@edmondswaterfrontcenter.or
Proof of nonprofit status: IRS letter, attached
Amount Requested: $50,000
Proposed use of the requested funds: addressing food insecurity among seniors through our
Senior Lunch Program.
Statement of need: We currently have more than 950 seniors registered for the lunch
program. Since March we have provided 3,889 senior meals. We anticipate that number will be
8,000 by year end. Participants pay anything between zero and a $5 recommended donation.
The program is not self-sustaining and relays on fundraising to cover the $15 / meal cost.
Other sources of funds available to address the stated need: We ask program participants and
diners at the Potlatch Bistro, if able, to pay if forward. We have sought funding from local
service clubs and plan to make a request to Verdant Health Commission.
Statement of how the organization and its programs, projects and activities enhance
economic, cultural, and/or quality -of -life aspects within the Edmonds Community:
■ The Waterfront Center has been constructed as a place where all people can gather,
learn and celebrate while responding to changing community needs.
■ The community is embracing the EWC. Since January we have gone from 1,329
members to 2,900 members
EDMONDS WATERFRONT CENTER
P.O. Box 7171 Edmonds, WA 980201 425.774.5555 1 www.edmondswaterfrontcenter.org
Packet Pg. 505
9.1.b
EDMONDS
Waterfront Center
Connecting & Enriching Our Community
• The EWC suffered economic hardship during the pandemic from pandemic related
construction costs, lost rental revenue and diminished fundraising
• Responding to the pandemic the EWC delivered more than 9,000 free meals to seniors
sheltering at home, provided telehealth support and online programing offered at no
charge to seniors across the county.
• We hosted COVID five popup vaccine centers, COVID testing, community blood drives,
ongoing healthcare services and opened as a cooling center during the recent heat
waves.
• We stand ready to assist as a Community Vaccine Center should booster shots be
required.
The Edmonds Senior Center has delivered on the promise to build a gathering place for the
community. We have demonstrated our commitment and ability to respond to changing
community needs. We look forward to our long-term partnership ahead and we thank you for
your thoughtful consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
Daniel Johnson, CEO
Edmonds Waterfront Center
EDMONDS WATERFRONT CENTER
P.O. Box 7171 Edmonds, WA 98020 1 425.774.5555 1 www.edmondswaterfrontcenter.org
Packet Pg. 506
9.1.b
t¢'� IRS
Department of the Traasury
�i a11171rtterrraIRevenueServ]cc
P.O. Box 2508, Room 4010
Cincinnati OH 45201
EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER
9 FARRELL B FLEMING
b PO BOX 717
,-} EDMONDS WA 98020-0717
023357
In reply refer to: 4077552844
Dec. 03, 2012 LTR 4168C 0
91-0828576 000000 00
00029951
BODC: TE
Employer Identification Number: 91-0828576
Person to Contact: Ms Fox
Toll Free Telephone Number: 1-877-829-5500
Dear Taxpayer:
This is in response to your Feb. 10, 2012, request for information
regarding your tax-exempt status.
Our records indicate that you were recognized as exempt under
section 501(c)(03) of the Internal Revenue Code in a determination
letter issued in May 1968.
Our records also indicate that you are not a private foundation within
the meaning of section 509(a) of the Code because you are described in
section(s) 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi).
Donors may deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of
the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or
for your use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes
if they meet the applicable provisions of sections 2055, 2106, and
2522 of the Code.
Please refer to our website www.irs.gov/eo for information regarding
filing requirements. Specifically, section 6033(]) of the Code
provides that failure to file an annual information return for three
consecutive Years results in rev6catdon-.of tax-exempt,status as of
the filing due date of the third return for organizations required to
file. We will publish a list of organizations whose tax-exempt
status was revoked under section 6033(]) of the Code on our website
beginning in early 2011.
If you have any questions, please call us at the telephone number
shown in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely yours,
Cindy Thomas
Manager, EO Determinations
Packet Pg. 507
9.1.b
OLYMPIC BALLET
THEATRE
Artistic Directors: Mara Vinson and Oleg Gorboulev
August 20, 2021
Patrick Doherty
Edmonds City Hall
1215th Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Patrick,
We are writing on the behalf of Olympic Ballet Theatre (OBT); we are grateful for the opportunity to
apply for the Edmonds Rescue Plan. We have enclosed a copy of our 501(c) (3) certification letter as
proof of our nonprofit status.
Since its formation in 1981, OBT's mission has been to develop and sustain professional dance, promote
dance as a creative performing art, and engage the widest possible audience with a stimulating
repertoire of classical, contemporary, and dramatic ballets. Over the years, we have expanded both the
length of our performance season and our repertoire programming to become Snohomish County's only
professional ballet company. OBT productions annually draw over 7,000 patrons from across the
greater Puget Sound area and beyond; the majority of our patrons come to performances at our home
venue, the Edmonds Center for the Arts. We have developed our audiences from both within and
outside of Edmonds, and have continued to grow as a non-profit arts organization. We created
professional company dancer positions to employ dancers full-time each season, a Trainee program for
aspiring pre -professional dancers, and our outreach program that introduces children from local
elementary schools to the joy of dance.
However, the COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented obstacle, and OBT has been unable to do
live performances or outreach events throughout 2020 and most of 2021. Being unable to perform The
Nutcracker in December 2020 was a particular setback for OBT, as a large portion of our revenue, and
what allows us to continue to create productions throughout the year, stems from ticket revenue from
The Nutcracker. Losses from cancelling our 2020 production of The Nutcracker are estimated to be
$95,000. We hope to return to live performances with The Nutcracker this December, but should
cancellations have to occur due to COVID-restrictions coming back due to new variants, the situation
would be especially strenuous.
A key setback caused by the COVID-19 restrictions and lack of funding from The Nutcracker 2020 was
cancelling the planned premiere of the full-length production of Don Quixote. The production was
originally planned to premiere in spring 2021 for OBT's 40th anniversary celebration, and is currently set
to premiere in May of 2022 at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. To aid in this endeavor, Olympic Ballet
Packet Pg. 508
Theatre would like to request $45,000 from the Edmonds Rescue Plan to put towards capital expenses
for our upcoming full-length premiere of Don Quixote.
By adding Don Quixote, a popular classical ballet, into OBT's repertoire, not only are we improving
quality of life in Edmonds by increasing the variety of ballets we can offer to our patrons, but each time
we invest in a production we are investing into a future asset. Any time we bring back a production
from our repertoire to present we remove the anxiety and costs of having to create sets and costumes,
we can pull from the previous resources we have crafted. Therefore, by creating the premiere of Don
Quixote, we are fulfilling our mission by building a diverse and stimulating repertoire and promoting
professional ballet, building the future for OBT, and creating an exciting premiere for the citizens of
Edmonds.
We debuted the Prologue and Act 1 of Don Quixote in our 2019 Summer Performance to a very warm
audience reception, and we are looking forward to finally premiering the full production. The budget for
Don Quixote is $156,470, and OBT would put $35,000 from the Edmonds Rescue Plan towards capital
expenses towards creating the production. Remaining funds would be used for related expenses,
including salaries for dancers and staff, storage expenses, and pointe shoes for female company dancers
and trainees.
In terms of other funds available, OBT has received COVID-relief assistance through CARES Act, run by
ArtsWA and the NEA, for a combined total of $12,290; Nonprofit Community Recovery through ArtsFund
and Washington State Department of Commerce for $10,000, and the Edmonds Cares Fund Business
Support Grant for $8,000. The funds received allowed us to cover the costs to put on two virtual
productions on OBT's YouTube channel in April and July 2021, such as dancer and staff salaries, hire
choreographers, video staff, and theater rentals. Through these free -to -view performances we have
been able to continue to maintain a public presence and engage with our audience.
As Snohomish County's premiere ballet company, OBT is a vital part of the vibrant arts community of
Edmonds. We are incredibly grateful to be offered this opportunity by the City of Edmonds, because
despite the setbacks from these unprecedented times, OBT has continued on and hopes to not only
come back but come back stronger than ever. We look forward to being able to once again serve our
community with live arts performances.
Please feel free to let us know if you have any questions, we would be happy to help.
Sincerely,
Mara Vinson & Oleg Gorboulev
Co -Artistic Directors
Kelline Blake
Administrative Assistant
700 Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020
olympicballet.org
(425) 774-7570 / dance@olympicballet.org
Packet Pg. 509
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
- EPJEO
OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE
700 MATH ST
EDMOND5, WA 93020
Gentlemen:
Internal Rpv4n,?e Service
Ep/EO Disr..losure Desk
P.O_ Box 2350 Los Angeles, CA 90053
Person to Contact:
L. Berragan to to IC)
F. Miraflor (L to Z)
Telephone TI1ymb4 r :
(213)894-2336
Refer Reply to:
91-142
Date: JAN 04IM1
RE: 23-7150349
OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE
This is in response to your request for a determination
letter of the above -named organization.
A review of our records indicates that the above -named
organization was recognized to be exempt from Federal income
tax in May 1972, as an organization described in
Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). It is further
classified as an organization that is not a private
foundation as defined in section 509(a) of the code, because
it is an organization described in section 509(A)(2).
This letter is to verify your exempt status
and the fact that the determination letter
issued in May 1972 continues to be -irk effect.
If you are in need of further assistance, please,.feel free to
coniact me at the above address.
Pie appreciate your cooperation in this regard.
Sincerely,
'ems
Disclosure Assistant
Packet Pg. 510
The
Phoenix
Theatre
Comedy without all the drama.
08/15/2021
Patrick Doherty
Edmonds City Hall
121 5th Ave North
Edmonds, WA98020
ARPA Review Committee,
The Phoenix Theatre in Edmonds writes to request rescue fundingfromthe American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA) funds in the amount of $27,500, approximately 23% of our annual operating budget.
The Phoenix Theatre is a registered 501(c )3 located in Edmonds in Firdale Village. Ourmission is
to bring laughterto the Pacific Northwest through qualityscripted comedictheatre.
Theatres likes ours in Washington were amongthe first in the nation to close due to COVID-19
and amongthe last to reopen —still facing major limitations to our operations including newly released
masking requirements for performers on stage. Ourtotal revenue from March to December202O was
reduced year -over -year by more than 80•1 gross. If you believe in the value of the arts, now is the time
to take direct action to save the once -thriving local arts scene by providing emergency funding to
organizations like ours in critical need of funding.
New Snohomish County mask mandates, coupled with the disturbing spread of the Delta variant
in Washington, make the future of ourtheatre extremely uncertain. Donations are down as the
community struggles with irregular employment, their health, and the rising costs of essentials due to
record -high inflation and supply chain failures. With your help and fundingfromthe Edmonds Rescue
Plan, we knowthat we can continue to put on high -quality, family -friendly, comediesthat bring joy to
local audiences.
Our commitmentto providing quality programming has continued throughoutthe pandemic --
we have neverstopped fulfilling our nonprofit mission. In Fall of 2020 our organization took our shows
online and put on five completelyfree streaming productions. We worked with more than 20 local
artists, designers, and technicians. The Phoenix opened forthree free classic movie nights understrict
COVI D guidelines and produced our first live mainstage show post -shutdown in June of2021. Our
productions, both on and off line, have been viewed by thousands of mostly local community members.
We take our job of giving Edmonds somethingto smile about very seriously.
As circumstances have become more challenging, we have consistently rolled up our sleeves
and gone to work, adaptingto the best of our ability. An investment in the Phoenix Theatre is an
investment in an adaptable, resilient organization. When we were able to have live audiences back in -
person we took every possible precaution to put on a compliant show to reduce the spread of COVID-
19. Our performances required proof of vaccination,100% audience masking, distanced seating,
enhanced sanitation, and increased distance from performers to audience members —justto name a
few precautions.
206.533.2000
Z phoenixtheatreinfo@gmail.com
9 9673 Firdale Avenue I Edmonds, WA 98020
www.tptedmonds.org
Packet Pg. 511
The
Phoenix
Theatre
Comedy without all the drama.
The Phoenix Theatre wasfortunate to receive fundingfromthe Shuttered Venue Operators
Grant in round 2 fundingfor organizations hit hardest by COVID, howeverthose federalfunds can only
be used between now and December311t, 2021 leaving our future beyond the end of the year uncertain.
We are currently in rehearsals for live performances which we can't count on being able to perform and
use to create a financial cushion forJanuary and beyond to pay even our most basic needs like rent.
If Rescue Plan funding is granted to our organization, we will use it in three ways:
1. Paying local artists to run ourorganization administratively,
2. To pay costs associated with putting on theatrical productions for the community such as
licensing, costs associated with our ticketing service, props and costumes, artist stipends, PPE
for our staff, supplies for enhanced sanitation,
3. And to pay our rentwhich is $2475 per month and has not been waived or deferred at all during
the pandemic. Simply put: money invested in the Phoenix Theatre is quickly re -invested intothe
community where we live, work, and make art.
Our women -led theatre is a space for inte rge ne rational cooperation, a safe space for queer and
BIPOC members of the community, and someplace where people can get a much -needed doseof
laughterin these tryingtimes.
It's science -fact that laughter has physiological benefits-ourArtistic Director Melanie
Calderwood is a certified Laughologist—and a nurse navigator with over30 years of nursing experience
workingforthe Evergreen Health System. She learned through certification that laughterhas been
proven to benefit cancer patients going through treatmentand recoverywhen used as a complementary
therapy. For everyday folks, laughter releases beneficial hormones like endorphins in your brain and
makes you feel good-- it also improves your immune response, reduces blood pressure, and increase
oxygen in the bloodstream and organs. A cancer survivor herself, Melanie knowsthe value of and need
for laughter in the community— regardless of yourlevel of health --and has dedicated the last 14 years
to de live ring theatre that delights local audiences.
If our request is funded, in whole or in part, it will make a tremendous impact on our ability to
maintain our operations into 2022. As an Edmonds community organization of over 14 years, we see
value in our work and we hope you do too. We serve around 5,500-8,000 individuals each yearfrom
Edmonds and around the Sound. If funding is granted, this will be the City of Edmonds first COVID-
related emergency assistance to the Phoenix Theatre.
Thank you for your consideration,
Tracy ShoemakerCahill
Phoenix Theatre
Tracy Shoemaker Cahill, Managing Director
541.410.2315 (cell)
206.533.2000
0 phoenixtheatreinfo@gmail.com
V 9673 Firdale Avenue I Edmonds, WA 98020
www.tptedmonds.org
Packet Pg. 512
3. IRS nonprofit determination letter
f SRVTCB
CINCINNATI, OH 45201
Date: JUL 4 6 2010
THE PHOENIX TI-MiRRU
9673 FIRD LE AVE
i?Uz,'ONA5, WA 98020
Dear Applicant:
DEPM�T'ri NT OF TIDE TREMURY
&Moyer Identification Number:
26-4105910
DLN:
600075013
Contact Person:
JOHN ALDM IIT III# 31695
Contact Telephone Number:
(877) 829-5500
Accounting Period Ending:
December 31
Public Charity status:
509 (a) (2)
Form 990 Required -
Yes
Effective Date of Exemption;
January 20, 2009
Contribution Deductibility:
Yes
Addendum Applies.
NO
We are pleased to inform you that upon review of your application for tax
exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax
under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code,. Contributions to you are
deductible under section 170 of the Code. You are also qualified to receive
tax deductible bequests, devises, transfers or gifts under section 2055, 2106
Or 2522 of the Code. Because this letter could help resolve any questions
regarding your esceapt status, you should keep it in your pe=umant records.
organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the code are further classified
as either public charities or private foundations. We determined that you are
a public charity under the Code section(s) listed in the heading of this
letter_
Please see enclosed Publication 4221-FC, Compliance Guide for 501(c)(3) Public
Charities, for some helpful iufozmatioan about your responsibilities as an
exempt organization.
Letter 947 (DO/CG)
Packet Pg. 513
Rotary
Club of Edmonds
August 9, 2010
Dear Patrick,
Thank you for the opportunity to recover funds lost due to COVID-19. Edmonds Rotary
has long been a reliable source of support for several organizations in our community.
These organizations have come to depend on us, and we take our commitment to
service seriously. You may contact me if you need any further information.
In order to continue to serve the above mentioned groups, I am requesting $30,000 on
behalf of Edmonds Rotary. I have mentioned how we would steer those funds to each
organization.
During COVID, we were able to continue with some of our fund-raising virtually, such as
the Photomarathon and Oktoberfest, but as you can imagine, our efforts were not able
to replenish our accounts as fully as previous years allowed. Below is a breakdown of
what we support, and what we have budgeted for this year.
Scholarships for Edmonds Area High School Students: $16,200.00
Trinity Place: $2,000.00
Kids in Transitoin: $2,000.00
Rotary Harvest Against Hunger/Edmonds Food Bank: $500.00
David Stern Police Officer of the year: $200.00
Edmonds Chamber of Commerce: $200.00
General Requests; approved by Board: $500.00
Clothes for Kids: $750.00
Rotary Foundation Matched giving: $1,500.00
Edmonds Waterfront Center/annual payment: $10,000.00
Total obligations to communities we serve: $33,850.00
We were only able to have three fund raisers last year: A virtual Oktoberfest, A
Christmas Market at Perrinville and the annual photomarathon. Those fund-raisers
netted us only $12,603.18.
We would use the grant of $30,000 to ensure that we can continue to support the many
programs that have relied on us for years. Without this funding, we may have to strictly
curb our budget this year and make painful decisions about which organizations we can
support. As you can see, we primarily serve women, children, seniors and the under-
fed. We had hoped to expand our philanthropic work this year into helping with more
environmental projects.
Packet Pg. 514
9.1.b
But just as important as the dollars we put into these programs, is the time and labor.
We pack lunches for Kids in Transition, we do yard clean-up and maintenance at Trinity
Place and we help keep the beach clean. Members of our club spent countless hours
during the pandemic helping at the Edmonds Food Bank. These valuable volunteer
hours cannot be measured on a financial spreadsheet, but are also of great value to our
community.
Attached you will find our final determination letter from the IRS for proof of non-profit
status.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Maggie Peterson
President
Edmonds Rotary
Packet Pg. 515
9.1.b
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
P. 0. BOX 2508
CINCINNATI, OH 45201
Date: MAR
2 5 2008
EDMONDS ROTARY FOUNDATION
PO BOX 115
EDMONDS, WA 96020
Dear Applicant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Employer Identification Number:
91-1683651
DIN:
6DS084001
Contact Person:
FAITH E CUMMINS ID# 31534
Contact Telephone Number:
(877) 829-5500
Public Charity Status:
Our letter dated April 2003, stated you would be exempt from Federal
income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and you would
be treated as a public charity, rather than as a private -foundation, during
an advance ruling period.
Based on the information you submitted, you are classified as a public charity
under the Code section listed in the heading of this letter. Since your
exempt status was not under consideration, you continue to be classified as
an organization exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the
Code.
Publication 557, Tax -Exempt Status for Your Organization, provides detailed
information about your rights and responsibilities as an exempt organization.
You may request a copy by calling the -toll -free number for forms,
(800) 829-3676. information is also available on our Internet Web Site at
www.irs.gov.
if you have general questions about exempt organizations, please call our
toll -free number shown in the heading.
Please keep this letter in your permanent records.
Sincerely yours,
Robert Choi
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Letter 1050 (DO/CG)
Packet Pg. 516
10.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Project Update for the Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Sydney Hall
Background/History
3/10/2020 - Sound Transit Funding Agreement presented to the Public Works and Parks Committee.
7/21/20 - Public hearing on Approval of Sound Transit Funding Agreement.
8/4/20 - City Council approved the Sound Transit Funding Agreement.
10/13/20 - The Professional Services Agreement with Blueline, Inc was presented to the Public Works
and Parks Committee.
10/20/20 - City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Blueline, Inc
5/4/21- Project Update & Design Recommendations provided to City Council.
9/14/2021- Project Update presented to the Parks and Public Works Committee.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adding the five additional improvements (Exhibit 1) to the project and to use REET
revenue to pay for the extra design and construction cost.
Narrative
The extensive public outreach effort, coupled with input from City Council, identified five additional
improvements desired by the community. These improvements focus on pedestrian safety and were
not in the original scope of work for the project. A description and preliminary cost estimate for each
add -on improvement are shown in Exhibit 1. Staff is recommending the design and construction of the
additional improvements be funded with REET funds.
The current proposed configuration at the Westgate intersection includes reducing the width of vehicle
lanes to allow installation of a northbound bicycle lane and shared lane markings ("sharrows") in the
southbound direction. New ramps will be installed so bicyclists who are not comfortable travelling in a
shared lane will have access to the sidewalk. There have been discussions about the possibility of
changing the design to add a southbound bicycle lane through the intersection. Staff will review the
pros/cons of this alternative during the presentation.
Background
In 2019, the City pursued and secured a grant from Sound Transit for installation of bicycle lanes. City
staff engaged in an extensive public outreach campaign. Listening sessions were held in December 2020
during which concerned citizens had the opportunity to share with City staff how they would like to see
the project unfold. Staff used this input along with other data they collected and designed several
concepts for the bike lane installations that were presented at a public meeting in February 2021.
Packet Pg. 517
10.1
City staff invited residents to the February public meeting by email, social media posts, door hangers,
digital message boards installed on the affected routes, and by press release. Residents were
encouraged to submit questions ahead of time and fill out a survey indicating which design concepts
they preferred. Staff used the data, surveys, and resident input to select which concepts would be
carried forward to full design and presented these decisions, along with the data used to make the
decisions, to City Council on May 4tn
Also during the May 4tn meeting, City Council requested staff hold another public meeting to present the
selected design alternatives to the public. This meeting was held on June 2nd. A list of questions asked
during this meeting and staff responses is attached (Exhibit 2).
Attachments:
Exhibit 1- Additional Improvements
Exhibit 2 - June Public Meeting Q&A
Exhibit 3 - Presentation
Packet Pg. 518
Exhibit 1
10.1.a
Additional Improvements
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4
Alt 5
Z N
H O
Ped Improve
Yost Park
Ped Improve &
Ped Improve &
High School
Totals
LLJ
& 9th/Pine
Entrance
Bowdoin/?
100th/224th
Entrance
V
1
I
I
Consultant
$ 13,500
1 $ 17,155
1 $ 13,500
$ 13,500
1 $ 7,884
1 $ 65,5:
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4
Alt 5
Z
0
Description
Ped Improve
Yost Park
Ped Improve &
Ped Improve &
High School
Totals
V
& 9th/Pine
Entrance
Bowdoin/?
9th/224th
Entrance
CC
N
Construction Contract
$ 33,250
$
58,150
$
33,250
$
33,250
$
33,250
$
191,1!
$ 3,325
$
5,815
$
3,325
$
3,325
$
3,325
$
19,1:
F_
V
Management Reserve 10%
$ 5,985
$
10,467
$
5,985
$
5,985
$
5,985
$
34,41
Z
Construction Management
1% Art
$ 333
$
582
$
333
$
333
$
333
$
1,9:
Total Construction
$ 42,893
$
75,014
$
42,893
$
42,893
$
42,893
$
246,51
Total Cost Alt $ 56,393 $ 92,169 $ 56,393 $ 56,393 $ 50,777 $ 312,1:
Running Total $ 148,561 $ 204,954 $ 261,346 $ 312,123
Alternative 1 - Pedestrian Improvement @ 9th Ave/Pine St
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) will be added to this intersection along with curb ramp upgrades and, if possible curb bulb- a
outs.
0
r
c
Alternate 2 - Yost Park Entrance m
E
Install new bulb -outs, realign the south leg of the intersection and install three new parallel parking stalls on 96th Ave south of the parl >
0
L
Q
E
Alternate 3 - Pedestrian Improvements on Bowdoin Way c
New striped crosswalk with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) will be added with curb ramp upgrades and, if possible curb bul o
outs. Improvements will be at 90th Ave or Pioneer Way. Exact location to be determined during design.
Q
Alternate 4 - Pedestrian Improvement @ 100th Ave/224th St. & 14th St
New striped crosswalk with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) will be added to this intersection along with curb ramp upgraclE t
and, if possible curb bulb -outs. w
r
c
a�
Alternate 5 - Pedestrian Improvement - Former Woodway High School Entrance/100th Ave E
Crosswalk will be moved from north side of intersection to south side. This will optimize traffic flows during peak periods and reduce r
the amount of red light time needed for north- and southbound traffic. Q
Packet Pg. 519
10.1.b
EXHIBIT 2
Q/A summary from Public Meeting on June 2, 2021
What is the purpose of bulb -outs? Will they intrude into the bike lane?
Curb bulb -outs protect pedestrians in a number of ways. By bulging out into the parking lane
they make pedestrians more visible to motorists and decrease the distance pedestrians have to
travel to cross the streets. They will not bulge into the bicycle lanes.
Why a 5' bike lane on one side and a 6' bike lane on the other? Why is a buffer better than a
wider bike and/or parking lane?
The typical standard width for a bike lane against a curb is 5' and 6' is standard for a bike lane
against parked cars. There are some places — intersections primarily - where the buffers will be
eliminated in order to accommodate different lane configurations. Going with minimum lane
widths throughout will enable us to drop the buffers and keep the lane widths consistent.
Can you reverse bike lane and parking lane so that parked cars are protecting bicyclists rather
than bicyclists protecting parked cars?
A setup like this would create a dangerous situation where bicyclists are obscured by parked
cars. This would result in accidents where motorists turning into driveways hit bicyclists that
they can't see coming. By keeping bicyclists on the traffic side of the parked cars we increase
visibility and, consequently, safety.
How will Sound Transit's proiected $11.513 budget gap impact the project?
Sound Transit has assured the City that their current funding shortfall will not affect the funding
programmed for the City's project.
How can you make the assumption that the bike lanes will take people to Edmonds shops and
restaurants when the bike lanes end on 9th?
There are many places in Edmonds where people can shop and eat that are not in the Bowl.
Bicyclists who do wish to shop and eat in the Bowl can take low volume surface streets down
the hill from 91n
Packet Pg. 520
10.1.c
Citywide Bicycle Improvements
Project Update - September 21, 2021
n .
Packet Pg. 521
•
Brief Timeline Recap
Westgate Intersection Alternatives
Additional Improvements
Remaining Schedule
Packet Pg. 522
10.1.c
Brief Timeline Reca
• City pursued and won a $1.85M Sound Transit grant in September, 2019 for
installation of bike lanes at various locations in Edmonds
• Design contract was awarded in September, 2020.
• Intense public interest in the project triggered a public outreach effort including:
— "Listening Sessions" held with interested residents in December, 2020
— Public Meeting via Zoom in February, 2021
— One-on-one meetings with residents as requested
— Online surveys
— Project email address and website
• Public input combined with data to drive design decisions
• Project design recommendations were presented to Council May 4t", 2021.
— Questions were raised about the Westgate intersection
— Additional public meeting was requested
• Public Meeting was held June 2, 2021
Packet Pg. 523
stgate i me rse ct i c
Alternative 1
• Adds 1 bike lane in each direction
• Eliminates 1 through -lane in each
direction
• Adds northbound and
southbound right turn lanes
=`lA
L
cd
G
d
O
aL
E
m
ar
3
r
U
r
0
ar
a
D
ar
O
L
O
r
C
to
O
L
a
M
t
X
W
r
C
d
E
t
v
R
a
Packet Pg. 525
Alternative 2
• Adds 1 northbound bike lane
• Adds shared lane markings
(sharrows) to southbound
through -lane
• Provides ramps so that
southbound cyclists can exit on to
the sidewalk, walk through the
intersection, and re-enter the
roadway south of the intersection
• Maintains current number of
through -lanes
• Travel lanes get slightly narrower
N�
To Ferry
r
_ I
PCC
i
i
To 1.5
E
O
aL
d
m
r
U
4-
R
,z
C
O
C
N
i
a
x
W
d
a
Packet Pg. 526
0
Side -by Side Comparison
Impacts to Motorists MMM&M
Vehicle lanes maintain current width
Intersection Level of Service drops
from CtoD
2381h to Elm Travel Time during PM Peak:
No Build — 207.2s
Alternative 1— 235.3s
Delay = 28.1s
40- "@- WF'
Vehicle lanes get slightly narrower
Intersection Level of Service stays at C
2381h to Elm Travel Time during PM Peak:
No Build — 207.2s
Alternative 2 — 209.6s
Delay = 2.4s
Packet Pg. 527
Side -by Side Comparison
Queue lengths at Westgate
100th Ave WISR 104 Intersection - Alt 1 PM 2030
50°% Queue Length
95°% Queue Length
49
Residential
--- 325'
Packet Pg. 528
Goodwill
r
w
10.1.c
SidembvComparisonSi
a
2
0
L
Queue lengths at Westgate
C
d
0
L
F 50% Oueue Length
E
100th Ave W'SR+104 Intersection - Alt 2 2030 =
:SDI Queue Length
j
Herly's
3
Medical Office r ... r ' .: __
PCC ,_ •To 15 �
Residential
v
F
Chopsticks
offices'
260' Key Bank
270'
12
a�
.
197
28E'
��
150' + T.
4Q2-
0
Q.
Packet Pg. 529
0
Sidembv Side Comparison
acts to Bicyclists AL
Alternative Alternative
Completes the bicycle lane network with
a direct connection for all cyclists through
Westgate
Increases usability of corridor by cyclists
Southbound cyclists are required to either
share a lane with vehicles or exit on to the
sidewalk
Cyclists will not consider this corridor to
be as safe or efficient as Alternative 1
Intangibles
Longer queues and greater delays could Increase future grant opportunities:
cause motorists to seek alternate routes.
This could result in adjacent
neighborhoods seeing increases in traffic
volumes and speeds
Granting agencies may be more likely to
fund a future bike lane expansion than
future lanes for motorized vehicles
Packet Pg. 530
Additional Improvements
Public comments indicated that residents want additional pedestrian safety
improvements
Design Team identified 4
intersections
pedestrian
could bring
the project
where enhanced
safety facilities
added quality to
• Design Team also identified
one intersection where existing
pedestrian facilities could be
realigned to streamline vehicle
traffic
• None of these improvements were scoped in the original project and they
would require additional City funds to install
Packet Pg. 531
•
Altj - 91h &Pine Pedestrian Improvements
Intersection experiences significant
pedestrian traffic
' Improve� d Pedestrian ' �
' Crossing
• Flashing beacons and, potentially, _,,
bulbed-out curbs would increase
safety
fit
L
C
d
0
aL
E
d
r
U
a�
r
0
a�
R
D
;
a�
�O
d
C
0
c
a�
N
a
Cl)
x
w
r
c
d
E
a
Packet Pg. 532
Alt 2 - Yost Park Entrance Improvements
• Intersection sees significant Bulbed-out curbs, new parking spots, and
pedestrian traffic (Yost Park minor intersection realignment could slow
Entrance) down vehicles and increase safety
t
r.
Packet Pg. 533
7a7.o
Alt 3 - Bowdoin & Pioneer Pedestrian Improveme _
Improved Pedestrian x' 'f"W
Crossing
.Y� Five Corners� ft ^
*� �v
No marked crossings exist
for approximately 0.8 mile
between Yost Park entrance & Five Corners roundabout
Residents have requested safer crossings in this area, specifically
• Possible improvements such as flashing beacons and bulbed-out curbs
would increase safety
Packet Pg. 534
Alt 4 - 10011 & 22411 Pedestrian Immovernents
L
cdc
_ G
o
L
Q
t-T
7l r
L
O
No marked crossings exist for
C
r
approximately 0.6 mile
between Westgate & 2201" St SW
Improved Pedestrian '* - g L
Crossing -_ • Flashing beacons, crosswalk M
markings, and, potentially,
bulbed-out curbs would increase W
. safety
Packet Pg. 535
10.1.c
Alt 5 - Woodway Campus Entrance Improvements
• Current configuration has
crosswalk north of the
intersection. Pedestrians
interfere with motorists
turning left to go north on
100th
• This requires longer green
time to clear queues from
high school and,
consequently, more
disruptions to traffic on 100tn
• Proposed configuration
would mitigate disruptions to
traffic on 100t" by moving
crosswalk to south side of
intersection
L
d
0
aL
E
m
U
a�
t
r
L
0
a
0
w
N
i
M
x
W
E
a
Packet Pg. 536
10.1.c
Costs of Additional Improvements
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4
Alt 5
Totals
Ped Improve
Yost Park
Ped Improve
Ped Improve
High School
9th/Pine
Entrance
Bowdoin/Shell
100th/224th
Entrance
Consultant
$ 13,500
$ 17,155
$ 13,500
$ 13,500
$ 7,884
$ 65,539
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4
Alt 5
Totals
Description
Ped Improve
9th/Pine
Yost Park
Entrance
Ped Improve
Bowdoin/Shell
Ped Improve
9th/224th
High School
Entrance
Construction Contract
Management Reserve 10%
Construction Management
1% Art
$
33,250
$
58,150
$ 33,250
$
33,250
$
33,250
$
191,150
$ 3,325
$ 5,815
$ 3,325
$ 3,325
$ 3,325
$
19,115
$ 5,985
$ 10,467
$ 5,985
$ 5,985
$ 5,985
$
34,407
$ 333
$ 582
$ 333
$ 333
$ 333
$
1,912
Total Construction
$
42,893
$
75,014
$ 42,893
$
42,893
$
42,893
$
246,584
st Alt
$ 56,393
$ 92,169
$ 56,393
$ 56,393
$ 50,777
$ 312,123
Total
$ 148,561
$ 204,954
$ 261,346
$ 312,123
L
_
cd
E
d
0
L
Q
E
d
'm
a�
3
U
a�
t
r
L
0
4-
a�
r
a
a�
0
a
_
0
r
a�
N
a
Packet Pg. 537
10.1.c
Remainein
Schedule
Design phase
— Complete in Winter 2021-2022
Construction phase
— Start in Spring 2022 and complete by end of '22
Packet Pg. 538
10.1.c
a
Packet Pg. 539
10.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Shirley Johnson Property Donation
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Narrative
Long-time Edmonds resident Shirley Johnson has generously gifted to the City her private property
located at 9309 Bowdoin consisting of 1.14 acres of single-family residential land adjacent to Yost Park.
(Attachment #1 - Aerial Graphic Map) Ms. Johnson passed away in January of this year and, at this time,
the Estate has been settled. The property has improvements including non -occupiable house and some
additional outbuildings that are in poor condition. It is relatively flat, with a slight downhill slope from
the southeast to the northwest and consists of mostly open areas with a small number of large trees.
The small house, several outbuildings and a considerable number of personal items will become
property of the City once title is transferred. Currently the house and an outbuilding are secured and the
site has had some minimal landscape maintenance through the summer.
The gifted property was conditioned per the Last Will and Testament of Shirleylohnson (Attachment #2
- Johnson Will) including a purpose clause which states that the property is given to the City "specifically
for purposes of being used as a park and/or a community garden site and/or to cultivate and grow
plants, fruits, vegetables and other related things all for the City of Edmonds and for the citizens of
Edmonds and the local community as the City of Edmonds deems best in their discretion."
The July 6, 2021 Appraisal values the property at $350,000 based on the deed restriction limiting the use
of the property to park/public use. The appraisal noted, however, a prior unfulfilled agreement
estimated the value to total $1.5M based on valuation of the property's development rights of about six
potential residential lots.
There were expenditures settling the Estate totaling $46,532 including attorney fees, back taxes and title
insurance, which the City has agreed to cover.
This donated acquisition supports two goals of the 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
The Plan's Goal #2 is to provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round
recreation opportunities and experiences in harmony with Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural
environment; and Goal #4 is to preserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat
conservation, recreation, and environmental education. This property provides opportunity to advance
these goals by connecting to and supporting Yost Park and providing year -around access in this natural
environment as well as providing for additional habitat conservation and significant environmental
education due to historic uses of gardening and farming.
Packet Pg. 540
10.2
Next steps for the property include short term plans of securing the site, general assessment of
remaining personal items, basic maintenance of the landscape, existing tree inventory and maintenance
assessment and possible demolition of the 1925 house, currently deemed uninhabitable. Longer term
management of the property include continued basic maintenance, tree care and an eventual Parks
Master Plan process with community engagement. The Master Plan will take into consideration the
donation conditions and wishes of Ms. Johnson; the results of the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space
(PROS) Plan as to how the property will best integrate into the Edmonds park system based on the
community's priorities as well as a significant public engagement process.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council approve the proposed Ordinance to accept the donation of the 1.14-acre
Shirley Johnson property located at 9309 Bowdoin Way adjacent to the City of Edmonds Yost Park.
Background
The City had worked with Shirley Johnson in the past to purchase the property through a life time estate
agreement. The negotiations came to in impasse and with change in Department personnel and COVID,
not much had been discussed with Ms. Johnson in the past couple of years. Shortly after her death, the
Estate Attorney notified the city that her will stated the city was to receive the land, buildings and her
personal property. It was stated Ms. Johnson wanted to donate the property to be used as a park and/or
community garden site and/or to cultivate and grow plants, fruits, vegetables and other related thing for
the citizens of Edmonds and the local community as the City of Edmonds deems best in their discretion.
Historically this property was run as a farm in the city by her parents Charles and Helen Spicer, from
whom Shirley inherited the parcel in 2007. Overgrown and not well maintained for years, there are a
number of remnant fruit trees which the City will assess for viability and attempt to preserve and
integrate into future use.
Attachments:
Johnson Property Arial Map
Johnson Will
2021-09-09 ordinance accepting deed from estate of Shirley johnson
Packet Pg. 541
,'III
'' � �
Johnson Property
. F
CL
IP
1
0
cu
C
0
0
0
CL
C
0
r-
0
a
CL
0
a
c
0
cn
c
0
C
0
t
t+
a
Packet Pg. 542
10.2. b
FILED
MAR 0 9 2021
HE'
D'
PERCY
t:OUNTY CLERK
SNOHOMISH CO. WASH.
LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT
OF 21 4
SHIRLEY JOHNSON
00397 31
Executed at Edmonds, Washington on the SC 14 E®
4dayof 2018. j� t9,- ORIGINAL
BENNETT & BENNETT • ATTORNEYS AT LAW
400 Dayton, Suite A • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (426) 776-0139
Packet Pg. 543
10.2.b
LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT
OF
SHIRLEY JOHNSON
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, SHIRLEY JOHNSON, being of
sound and disposing mind and memory and of legal age, and not acting under duress, menace, fraud or
undue influence of any person whomsoever, but considering the uncertainties of life, do make, publish
and declare this to be my Last Will and Testament, hereby revoking and annulling any and all will or
wills, codicil or codicils, heretofore by me made.
Identification of Beneficiaries
I hereby declare that I am a single woman and that I had one child, namely, MARCHAM
JOHNSON, who predeceased me leaving no issue surviving. I have no other living children, either
natural or adopted, and I have no deceased children with lineal issue surviving them.
Il
Payment of Taxes, Debts and Fees
I direct that out of my estate there shall be paid my funeral expenses, the expense of my last
illness and all allowed claims duly and timely made, if any, except those which may be specific liens on
property holdings, which obligations my personal representative is authorized to continue in force if
and for so long as in the judgment of my personal representative it is necessary and advisable for the
maintenance and preservation of such property. I also direct my personal representative to pay from my
estate all costs incurred in the administration thereof, including, but not limited to, inheritance taxes,
personal representative's fee, accountant's fee, attomey's fee, and miscellaneous costs.
Specific Bequests
In the event of my death, I hereby give and bequeath the following specific bequests:
A. List Provision. I have or may have executed a written list pursuant to RCW 11.12.255,
which list shall be signed and dated and is incorporated herein by this reference and which list shall
adc/clients/Johnson-Shirley ep/Will 2018-gap filler/9/10/2018 Page 1
BENNETT & BENNETT - ATTORNEYS AT LAW
400 Dayton, Suite A - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - (425) 776-0139
Packet Pg. 544
10.2. b
direct the disposition of various items of my tangible personal property, but which list I may change
from time to time, as allowed by RCW 11.12.260. I hereby give and bequeath to those persons listed,
such items of tangible personal property as I have or may have specified on said list, and if the person
named to receive such personal property in such written list predeceases me, then unless otherwise
provided, that gift of tangible property shall fail and lapse, and shall pass, in its entirety, into the
residue of my estate.
B. Melvin D. Johnson Artwork. I give all of the artwork produced by my late husband,
MELVIN D. JOHNSON, to my nephew and his wife, DAVID PUETZ, and his wife, JANET PUETZ.
IV
Bequest of Residue
I hereby give, bequeath and devise all the rest and residue of my estate, both real and personal,
of every kind, nature and description and wheresoever situated, of which I may die seized or possessed
or in which I may have an interest at the time of my demise, to the CITY OF EDMONDS, and with
respect to my real property at 9309 Bowdoin Way, Edmonds, WA, specifically for purposes of being
used as a park and/or a community garden site and/or to cultivate and grow plants, fruits, vegetables
and other related things all for the City of Edmonds and for the citizens of Edmonds and the local
community as the City of Edmonds deems best in their discretion.
V
Nomination of Personal Representative
I hereby nominate and appoint as personal representative of this my Last Will and Testament
attorney, BLAIR J. BENNETT, and in the event that he is unable or unwilling to serve as such personal
representative, then I nominate and appoint CITY OF EDMONDS or their nominated representative, as
personal representative of this my estate. My personal representative shall serve without bond and
without the intervention of any court or courts. He or they shall have the power to sell, lease, mortgage,
grant or dispose of any real or personal property belonging to the estate, all without the approval or
interference of any court, the same as if he or they were the absolute owner thereof and whether or not
the same is necessary for the payment of debts or expenses of administration of my estate, and these
powers shall be unrestricted. -It is my intention to make this a non-intervention Will, to be administered
without reference to the Court, except as may be required by law.
adc/clients/Johnson-Shirley ep/Will 2018-gap filler/9/10/2018 Page 2
BENNETT & BENNETT • ATTORNEYS AT LAw
400 Dayton, Suite A • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 776-0139
Packet Pg. 545
10.2. b
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
2018.
This instrument, consisting of five (5) pages, including this page, the following Affidavit of
Subscribing Witnesses to Will, and the cover page, was on the date thereof, by the said SB RLEY
JOHNSON, signed and published as and declared by her to be her Last Will and Testament in the
presence of us who, at her request and in her presence and in the presence of each other, have on the
same date subscribed our names as witnesses hereto.
residing at , Washington
residing at Washington
adc/clients/Johnson-Shirley ep/Will 2018-gap filler/9/10/2018 Page 3
BENNETT & BENNETT • ATTORNEYS AT LAW
400 Dayton, Suite A • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 776-0139
Packet Pg. 546
10.2.b
AFFIDAVIT OF SUBSCRIBING WITNESSES
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
The undersigned witnesses, being first duly sworn on oath, depose and say:
I. EXECUTION. The document, now shown to me as the Last Will and Testament of
SHIRLEY JOHNSON, was executed by her on the l 7 day of 018, at
Edmonds, Washington. o
.2
c
II. DECLARATION. Immediately prior to execution, SHIRLEY JOHNSON declared the 0
0
document to be her Will and requested us to subscribe our names to it.
L
III. SIGNATURES. SHIRLEY JOHNSON signed the Will in the presence of both of the 0-
witnesses, and the witnesses attested the execution by subscribing their names in the presence of the a
c
testatrix and each other. 0
c
IV. CAPACITY. SHIRLEY JOHNSON appeared to be of sound mind and acted freely and 0
without any duress or undue influence. The witnesses were both competent. =
c
0
WITNES
WITNESS:
a
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this l day of ,
2018.
ANGELIA D CHRISTENSEN
NOThRY PUBLIC
STATE OF WASHINGTON
I.ioeRse Kara W 30506
My Commission Expires A QW 2S,,Z0t2
Affidavit of Subscribing
Witnesses
0jrIVAA . VV ows"
Notary lic in and for the State of Washington
Residing at Ylcc —`-e--O
My commission expires: 2 f- • 1 �
BENNETT & BENNETT • ATTORNEYS AT LAw
400 Dayton, Suite A • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 776-0139
Packet Pg. 547
10.2.c
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY
THROUGH A PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED
FROM THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY M. JOHNSON SUBJECT o
TO CERTAIN TERMS WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN THAT
DEED. c°
aD
0.
0
L
WHEREAS, Shirley M. Johnson was a long term resident of the City of Edmonds, who a
a
resided at 9309 Bowdoin Way; and
0
WHEREAS, Shirley M. Johnson's property consists of 1.14 acres of single family
c
residential land adjacent to Yost Park; and
WHEREAS, Shirley M. Johnson passed away on January 31, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Shirley M. Johnson wished to leave most of her property, including her real
property, to the City of Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, Section IV of the Last Will and Testament of Shirley Johnson reads as
follows:
I hereby give, bequeath and devise all the rest and residue of my estate, both real
and personal, of every kind, nature and description and wheresoever situated, of
which I may die seized or possessed or in which I may have an interest at the time
of my demise, to the CITY OF EDMONDS, and with respect to my real property
at 9309 Bowdoin Way, Edmonds, WA, specifically for purposes of being used as
a park and/or a community garden site and/or to cultivate and grow plants, fruits,
vegetables and other related things all for the City of Edmonds and for the citizens
of Edmonds and the local community as the City of Edmonds deems best in their
discretion.
and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.21.100 states that "Every city and town by ordinance may accept
any money or property donated, devised, or bequeathed to it and carry out the terms of the
donation, devise, or bequest, if within the powers granted by law. If no terms or conditions are
attached to the donation, devise, or bequest, the city or town may expend or use it for any
municipal purpose."; and
Packet Pg. 548
10.2.c
WHEREAS, the city council acknowledges the specified purpose of Shirley M. Johnson
in leaving her property to the City of Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, counsel for the Estate of Shirley M. Johnson has prepared a Personal
Representative's Deed to be executed by Blair J. Bennett as personal presentative of the estate,
which deed also includes a reference to the specific purposes contemplated in Shirley Johnson's
will;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Council hereby accepts title to the real property described
in the above referenced Personal Representative's Deed from the Estate of Shirley M. Johnson,
pursuant to the specific purpose terms as also described in that deed, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The
Edmonds City Council also hereby accepts title to the personal property remaining at Ms.
Johnson's former residence.
Section 2. The mayor is hereby authorized to indicate the City's acceptance in Section 1,
above, by placing his signature on the "accepted by" signature block.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city
council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
IF
0
r
c�
c
0
0
as
a
0
a`
c
0
N
C
t
0
Packet Pg. 549
10.2.c
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
:•
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 550
10.2.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
IF
2
r
On the day of , 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting c°
of the title, provides as follows:
as
a
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a
WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING TITLE TO REAL
PROPERTY THROUGH A PERSONAL
c
REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED FROM THE ESTATE OF c
SHIRLEY M. JOHNSON SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
TERMS WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN THAT DEED.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
E
2021.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 551
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/21/2021
Council Committee Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
The Council committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PSPP091421
FC091421
PPW091421
Packet Pg. 552
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
September 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Emily Wagener, HR Analyst
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Audio/Visual Assistant Job Description
Ms. Wagener explained the City has long retained an employee via an employment agreement as an
administrative assistant in charge of audio/video recording for City Council and Planning Board
meetings. Historically, this position has been employed through an employment contract with 2-year
terms. Human Resources has reviewed and updated the related job description and compensation and
the job description is ready to be reviewed and approved. Once approved, the employee currently
working in this position will be transitioned to the hourly wage scale and future employee agreements
will no longer be necessary. A brief discussion followed regarding why this position was being
transitioned from an employment contract to an employee.
Action: Consent Agenda
2. Soecial Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses
Mr. Passey explained this proposal has been in the works for years, was delayed due to a lack of events
as a result of COVID and now there is renewed interest in special events permitting. The City's special
event program has been handled administratively in the past and there was no adopted City code
outlining the process or criteria for issuing permits. The purpose is to establish a formal process for
permitting special events that impact City right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services.
He described the interdepartmental effort to research and draft the code as well as efforts to research
and compare other cities' codes and procedures.
Another goal of the special event permit code is to distinguish it from events partially or fully sponsored
by the City which are governed by a formal agreement that is approved by the Council. Special event
permits are smaller events not sponsored by the City such as neighborhood block parties, benefit walks,
store's customer events, etc. Staff also cleaned up outdated and obsolete code provisions in Title 4
regarding licenses, updated ECC 4.72 Business Licenses to reflect the city's partnership with the State
of Washington Department of Licensing, and updated Chapter 4.98 Constitutionally Protected Events,
to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected spontaneous
demonstrations.
If the Council adopts the new special event permit code, staff recommends adoption of a resolution
adding permit fees to the City's Fee Schedule, consistent with the policy of recovering costs associated
with reviewing and issuing city permits. Staff proposes a $50 permit fee for events with less than 100
Packet Pg. 553
11.1.a
09/14/21 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
people and $125 for events over 100 people which is similar to fees charged by other cities. Tonight's
presentation is intended as an introduction with a future presentation to full Council.
Discussion followed regarding whether street -side fruit vendors were required to have a business
license, the City Council's role other than adoption of the special event permit policy and fee schedule,
a suggestion for a third fee for events with less than 50 people such as block parties, intent of the fee
to cover staff time to review impacts, ways to disseminate information to the public about the need for
a permit, ADA requirements for special events, adult entertainment locations, and a suggestion to
conferring with Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss and Diversity Commission VC Dean Olson
regarding ADA requirements.
Action: Presentation to full Council.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 5:22 p.m.
Packet Pg. 554
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
September 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Vivian Olson
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis
CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Dave Turley, Finance Director
Megan Menkveld, Deputy Admin. Serv. Dir.
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m.
by Councilmember Buckshnis. The agenda was reordered to take the Proposed Amendments to the
PFD Charter first.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Proposed Amendments to PFD Charter
EPFD Board President Brewster explained the proposed amendments to the PFD Charter are driven
in part by the need to replace a board member who is no longer attending meetings as well as clean
up language and processes.
Board VP Liaw explained prior to the pandemic, the board was considering housekeeping v
amendments to the charter such as remote attendance. She highlighted changes related to how new
board members are appointed, removing a board member, officer positions, and remote participation. N
The EPFD's legal counsel reviewed the amendments and the amendments have been approved by rn
the EPFD Board. v
U_
Questions and discussion followed regarding "or its successor" in the Board Composition section,
removal of a board member after three consecutive meetings, clarifying the types of approved E
absences in the EPFD Board's bylaws, state law regarding absences, and a suggestion to clarify U
absence from meetings was from "regular meetings." a
The EPFD was asked to provide an agenda memo.
Action: Consent Agenda
1. 2021 September Budget Amendment
Mr. Turley advised there are 8 requests; if approved, the budget amendment would increase
forecasted revenues by $6,119,975, and would increase budgeted expenditures by $201,457. He
reviewed the proposed September budget amendment:
• Request for $20,000 in professional services for additional costs being incurred by the HR
Department for increased costs related to recruitment, testing and background investigations
as they work to fill several positions in the Police Department
o Finance Committee direction: Forward to PSPP Committee for review
Request for change in status for HR Analyst position, making permanent the temporary
increase of the HR Analysis position from part-time to full-time.
Packet Pg. 555
11.1.b
09/14/21 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
o Finance Committee direction: Forward to PSPP Committee for review
• Request to "unfreeze" the salaries and benefits for the Administrative Services Deputy Director
position
• Request budget authority to transfer remaining year-end balance out of Firemen's Pension
Fund into General Fund. This change in where we account for these costs was initiated by
changes that have been made to the State BARS manual and a change in practice by the
State Auditor's Office.
• Request budget authority to transfer the remaining year-end balance out of the Memorial
Street Tree Fund. Fund has been dormant for several years and we would like to move the
remaining balance into the recently created Tree Fund so that these funds can be utilized by
the City.
• Add the City's new Urban Forest Planner salary and wages and position to the 2021 budget.
This position was approved on June 22nd
• Record the anticipated receipt of bond proceeds as authorized by Council. The bond sale has
not yet occurred but we would like to record the anticipated revenue now to make preparing
the 2022 budget more straightforward.
• Request the budget authority to transfer $25,000 from the General Fund into the Risk
Management Fund to pay small claims
Questions and discussion followed regarding the delay in filling the Safety & Disaster Coordinator
position, status of the bond issuance, and the policy for paying claims out of the Risk Management
Fund.
Action: Forward first two items to PSPP Committee in October and staff make presentation on
remainder to full Council
Mr. Turley reviewed the timeline for the bond issuance. Discussion followed regarding bond rates
3. July 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Mr. Turley introduced Ms. Menkveld and she described her background.
Mr. Turley reviewed items of note:
• REET is up to $1,446,881 from this point in time last year
• Real personal/property tax is up $190,242 from this point in time last year
• EMS property tax is up $96,829 from this point in time last year
• Sales tax is up $1,248,744 from this point in time last year
• Plan Checking Fees are up $136,100 from this point in time last year; Development Services
revenues overall are up $67,892 from this point in time last year
• Parks & Recreation program fees are up $223,666 from this point in time last year
• We are now at 58% of the year completed; all departments but Finance (due to merging with
Clerk's Office) are within or under budget or where they expected to be
• Graphs
o Sales tax revenues continue to exceed both 2020 actual receipts and 2021 budget receipts
o REET revenues continue to exceed both 2020 actual receipts and 2021 budget
Discussion followed regarding reasons for overtime (Police Department vacancies, and overtime
budgets being too low).
Action: Consent Agenda
4. Miscellaneous
N
N
r
7
as
as
r
r
E
E
0
U
v
c
0
U
N
rn
0
U
U_
c
W
E
U
2
a
Packet Pg. 556
11.1.b
09/14/21 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
Mr. Turley advised the Council will receive the proposed 2022 budget from the Mayor on September
27th
Questions and discussions followed regarding items in the budget that are discretionary, number of
decision packages in the 2022 budget, residents' interest in new sidewalks and repairing existing
sidewalks, and the need to reviewing the CIP/CFP in detail.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 6:57 p.m.
fn
N
r
7
C
N
N
r
r
E
E
O
U
v
c
O
U
N
On
O
U
tL
c
a)
E
t
v
2
Q
Packet Pg. 557
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
September 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Laura Johnson Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Councilmember Luke Distelhorst Rob English, City Engineer
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cul. Serv. & Human Serv. Dir.
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Ryan Hague, Capital Project Manager
Scott Passey, City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by
Councilmember Distelhorst.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Supplemental Agreement with Osborn Consulting, Inc. for the Phase 3 Storm
Maintenance Project
Mr. English relayed a consultant selection process last resulted in the selection of Osborn Consulting
for Phases 2 and 3. The City Council awarded the construction contract for Phase 2 in July. This
supplemental agreement is to design Phase 3 which includes two segments, 1) Pine Street — 1,800
lineal feet of pipe replacement and potentially an infiltration facility, and 2) 881" Avenue — 2,600 lineal
feet of pipe replacement. Staff is still negotiating the fee and recommend placing the agreement on the
Consent Agenda once the fee negotiations are complete.
Questions and discussion followed regarding a cultural resources documentation not being required
and the State database regarding the location of cultural resources.
Action: Consent Agenda after fee negotiations complete
2. Protect Update for the Citywide Bicycle Improvement Protect
Mr. Hague reviewed:
Timeline Reap
o City pursued and won a $1.85M Sound Transit grant in September, 2019 for installation of
bike lanes at various locations in Edmonds
o Design contract was awarded in September 2020
■ Intense public interest in the project triggered a public outreach effort including
- "Listening sessions" held with interested residents in December 2020
- Public meeting via Zoom in February 2021
- One-on-one meetings with residents as requested
- Online surveys
- Project email address and website
o Public input combined with data to drive design decisions
o Project design recommendations were presented to Council May 4, 2021
■ Questions were raised about the Westgate intersection
■ Additional public meeting was requested
- Public meeting held June 2, 2021
Packet Pg. 558
11.1.c
09/14/21 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
Westgate Intersection
o Alternative 1
■ Adds 1 bike lane in each direction
■ Eliminates 1 through -lane in each direction
■ Adds northbound and southbound right turn lanes
o Alternative 2
■ Adds 1 northbound bike lane
■ Adds shared lane markings (sharrows) to southbound through -lane
■ Provides ramps so that southbound cyclists can exit onto the sidewalk, walk through the
intersection and reenter the roadway south of the intersection
■ Maintains current number of through -lanes
■ Travel lanes get slightly narrower
Side -by -side Comparison
o Impacts to motorists
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Vehicle lanes maintain current width
Vehicle lanes get slightly narrower
Intersection LOS drops from C to D
Intersection LOS stays at C
238th Elm travel time during PM Peak
238th Elm travel time during PM Peak
No build — 207.2s
No build — 207.2s
Alternative 1 — 235.3s
Alternative 2 — 209.6s
Delay — 28.1 s
Delay — 2.4s
o Queue lengths at Westgate
■ Graphic identifying 50% and 95% queue northbound and southbound
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Lengthy queues impacting driveways in
both directions
Shorter queues — 130' shorter than Alt 1
o Impacts to Bicyclists
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Completes the bicycle lane network
Southbound cyclists are required to
with a direct connection for all cyclists
either share a lane with vehicles or exit
through Westgate
onto the sidewalk
Increases usability of corridor by
Cyclists will not consider this corridor
cyclists
to be as safe or efficient as Alt 1
o Intangibles
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Longer queues and greater delays
Increase future grant opportunities;
could cause motorists to seek
granting agencies may be more likely to
alternative routes. This could result in
fund a future bike lane expansion than
adjacent neighborhoods seeing
future lanes for motorized vehicles
increases in traffic volumes and speeds
Additional Improvements
o Public comments indicated residents want additional pedestrian safety improvements
o Design Team identified four intersections where enhanced pedestrian safety facilities could
bring added quality to the project
o Design Team also identified one intersection where existing pedestrian facilities could be
realigned to streamline vehicle traffic.
o None of these improvements were accepted in the original project and they would require
additional City funds to install
o Alternative 1 — 9th & Pine Pedestrian improvements
■ Intersection experiences significant pedestrian traffic
■ Flashing beacons and potentially bulbed out curbs would increase safety
o Alternative 2 — Yost Park Entrance Improvements
■ Intersection sees significant pedestrian traffic (Yost Park entrance)
Packet Pg. 559
11.1.c
09/14/21 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3
■ Bulbed-out curbs, new parking spots, and minor intersection realignment could slow
down vehicles and increase safety
o Alternative 3 — Bowdoin & Pioneer Pedestrian Improvements
■ No marked crossings exist for approximately 0.8 miles between Yost Park entrance and
Five Corners roundabout
■ Residents have requested safer crossings in this area, specifically
■ Possible improvements such as flashing beacons and bulbed-out curbs would increase
safety
o Alternative 4 100t" & 224t" Pedestrian Improvements
■ No marked crosswalks exist for approximately 0.6 mile between Westgate and 220th St
SW
■ Flashing beacons crosswalk markings and potentially bulbed-out curbs would increase
safety
o Alternative 5 — Woodway Campus Entrance Improvements
■ Current configuration has crosswalk north of the intersection. Pedestrians interfere with
motorists turning left to go north on 100tn
■ This requires longer green time to clear queues from high school and consequently more
disruptions on 1001n
■ Proposed configuration would mitigate disruptions to traffic on 100th by moving crosswalk
to south side of intersection
• Additional Improvements
Description
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4
Alt 5
Totals
z
Ped Improve
Yost Park
Ped Improve &
Ped Improve &
High
& 9thlPine
Ent
Bowdoin ?
100thl224th
School Ent
QCO
Consultants
$13,500
$17,155
$13,500
$13,500
$7,884
$65,539
Const. Contract
$33,250
$58,150
$33,250
$33,250
$33,250
$191,150
M mt Reserve 10%
$3, 325
$5, 815
$3, 325
$3, 325
$3, 325
$19,115
Const. M mt
$5,985
$10,467
$5,985
$5,985
$5,985
$34,407
z �
1% Art
$333
$582
$333
$333
$333
$1,912
O O
Total Const.
$42, 893
$75, 014
$42, 893
$42, 893
$42, 893
$246, 584
Total Cost Alt
$56, 393
$92,169
56,93
$56, 393
$50, 777
$312,123
Running Total
$148,561
$204,954
$261,346
$321,123
• Remaining Schedule
o Design Phase — complete winter 2021-2022
o Construction phase — start in spring 2022 and completed in end of 2022
Questions and discussion followed regarding use of unanticipated 2021 REET funds for additional
improvements, appreciation for pedestrian improvements, bicyclist delay in Westgate alternatives, light
cycle time for Westgate intersection, impacts of Westgate alternatives, conflicts between right turns and
bike lanes in Westgate alternatives, whether bike improvements will increase bike riding, improvements
at Woodway Campus entrance, and adding pedestrian lead time at Woodway Campus entrance
Action: Presentation to full Council September 21It
3. Supplemental Agreement with Blueline for Citywide Bicycle Improvement Proiect
Mr. English explained much of what was presented in the previous agenda item led to the extra work
by Blueline such as additional public outreach, evaluation of design alternatives, coordination of
meetings, presentations, etc. The attachment identifies out -of -scope work already completed
(alternatives analysis and additional outreach), additional work requested by the City — yet to be
completed (signal timing, additional outreach and replenishing the management reserve used to
reimburse the consultant for a portion of the extra work completed to date ), and the five additional
improvements requested by Council and/or resident engagement, for a total of approximately $110,000.
Staff recommends scheduling approval of the supplemental agreement on the Consent Calendar after
Packet Pg. 560
11.1.c
09/14/21 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4
a decision is made regarding which pedestrian safety improvements will be added to the project. He
recommended REET be used to fund the additional improvements and the remainder funded by the
Sound Transit grant.
Action: Consent Agenda (after Council decision regarding additional improvements)
4. Purchase of new Wastewater Pump for Lift Station 1
Mr. Williams explained this is a large pump station with two pumps located on Sunset Avenue. It has
been plagued with occasional problems due to items in wastewater that damage the pump. When the
pump was sent out for repair, the City was told this is the last time it can be fixed so it behooves the
City to purchase a successor pump now. The cost of the pump is $129,045.12 including delivery.
Because the cost is over $100,000, it requires Council approval.
Mr. Williams responded to questions regarding what happened if the pump fails again and a new pump
has not been purchased, the lifespan of the pump, whether the old pump has any value for parts,
whether the design of new pump has changed to handle items in sewer, and an awareness campaign
to inform people what not to flush.
Action: Consent Agenda
5. Civic Park Funding - Washington State DOC Grant
Ms. Feser introduced David Kaufer, Edmonds Rotary, and explained earlier this year the Edmonds
Rotary applied for and received an appropriation from the State for the inclusive playground at Civic
Park. After the award, it was discovered the Rotary was not technically eligible to be the recipient of the
grant funding, and the City, as the property owner, needs to be recipient. To start that process, the State
requires letter from the City stating willingness to accept the funds, that the City owns the property and
will complete the project as proposed. She brought this item to the Council due to the amount, $258,000.
There will likely be a formal contract with the State in the future. The Rotary has already relayed their
agreement to the State.
Action: Consent Agenda
6. Waterfront Redevelopment Project - EWorks Landscape Contract Amendment #4
Ms. Feser relayed over the course of the project, there have been four amendments to the contract with
the landscape contractor. In August 2019 the contractor advised additional funding would be necessary
to complete the project and the City agreed to Amendment #3 not to exceed $178,000. By the end of
the project, the Public Works project manager negotiated a lesser amount than what was anticipated in
Amendment #3. The City Attorney advised Amendment #4 was required to formalize the items funded.
The project was completed under budget by $8,500, which is amazing considering COVID, the length
of project, and the discovery of unexpected items. She recognized Project Manager Henry Schroder for
his work on project.
Action: Consent Agenda
7. Civic Park Fundinq - 2021 Snohomish County ILA
Ms. Feser advised this is another source of funding for Civic Park. Snohomish County makes
appropriations of REET funds; the City received $450,000 for Civic Park from that program in three
increments of $150,000 each. Each appropriation requires a new ILA. This is the second of the three
allocations. She is in the process of developing the attachments to the ILA and will include them in the
Packet Pg. 561
11.1.c
09/14/21 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5
packet when this is on the Consent Agenda. She responded to a question regarding the deadline to use
the funding and the ability to extend if necessary.
Action: Consent Agenda
8. Shirley Johnson Property Donation
Ms. Feser relayed former Parks & Recreation Director Hite had been talking with Ms. Johnson about
selling her property to the City and maintaining a lifetime estate. That was never completed and after
Ms. Johnson passed in January, the City was contacted by her estate attorney to inform that she had
willed the property to City. Over the past 7 months, staff has worked with the attorney to reach the point
of donation.
Ms. Feser reviewed:
• Address: 9309 Bowdoin Way, adjacent to Yost Park
• Size: 1.14 acres
• Appraised Value with condition be used for a park: $350,000
• Market value without condition: $1.5M
• Zoning: Single family, potential for 6 lots
• Quote from will: "Purpose of being used as a park and/or community garden ... for the citizens
of Edmond and the local community as the Cit of Edmonds deems best in their discretion."
• There will be public planning process for use of the site
• Outstanding expenses: $44,532 (back taxes, title insurance, attorney fees)
• Recognize attorney for securing home and maintaining site
• Photos of site - January 2021, site after attorney secured
on site, house boarded up, holly tree
• Next steps
o Council approval
o Short term
■ Site security
■ Assessment of personal items
■ Basic maintenance
■ Tree inventory and maintenance assessment
■ Possible demolition of the buildings
o Long term
■ Continued basic maintenance
■ Tree care
■ Master Plan
buildings and removed items, sheds
Discussion followed regarding providing additional information regarding the family when this is
presented to Council and whether a zoning change will be required.
Action: Presentation to full Council to publicly recognize gift
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
Packet Pg. 562