The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-11-16 City Council - Full Agenda-30211. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. o Agenda Edmonds City Council V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 NOVEMBER 16, 2021, 7:00 PM THIS MEETING IS HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING PLATFORM. TO JOIN, COMMENT, VIEW, OR LISTEN TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN ITS ENTIRETY, PASTE THE FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. IN ADDITION TO ZOOM, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ROLL CALL PRESENTATIONS 1. Resolution thanking Luke Distelhorst for Service on the City Council (5 min) 2. Resolution regarding The Edmonds Marsh (5 min) 3. Recognition of Rich Lindsay 50th Work Anniversary APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AUDIENCE COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda November 16, 2021 Page 1 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 26, 2021 2. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of October 27, 2021 3. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2021 4. Approval of claim checks, payroll checks and direct deposit. 5. Part Time Receptionist Job Description Revision 6. Proposed Snohomish County PUD Easement for Civic Center Park Project 7. Amendment No. 1 to Snohomish County Public Defender Association Professional Services Agreement for Indigent Defense Services 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Public Hearing Deliberations and Adoption of the 2022 Budget (90 min) 2. Proposed 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (45 min) 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda November 16, 2021 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Resolution thanking Luke Distelhorst for Service on the City Council Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History It has been customary to adopt a resolution thanking Councilmembers for their service at the end of their term. Staff Recommendation Adopt a resolution thanking Councilmember Distelhorst for his dedication and service. Narrative A resolution will be presented to Councilmember Distelhorst on the November 16, 2021 agenda. Attachments: RESOLUTION of Appreciation —Luke Distelhorst Packet Pg. 3 4.1.a RC.50tutt"On ,Q0:1482 A Resolution Of The Edmonds City Counci(Thanking Luke 1Distelhorst fort is Service To The Edmonds City Council Whereas, Luke D ste(horst was appointed to the City Council in February 2020 to fill the seat vacated by Mike Nelson. During his tenure Councilmember Distelhorst communicated with and embraced the concerns of Edmonds citizens, City staff, community leaders and other elected officials. Whereas, during his term, Councilmember Distelhorst approached his duties diligently — apprising himself of all the facts and ensuring that the Council as a body had all the relevant information needed to make informed decisions. As such, he helped to see the completion of the following: • Suicide Prevention Month • Advocating for affordable housing • Eviction moratorium during the COVID crisis • Suspending the issuance Driving While License Suspended in the Third Degree & supporting the creation of the Driver's Relicensing Program at Edmonds Municipal Court Whereas, while serving on Council, Mr. Distelhorst was involved with many committees and commissions on behalf of the City of Edmonds including: • Diversity Commission 0 Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee • Affordable Housing Alliance 0 Snohomish County Tomorrow Leadership Board , Vow, Therefore, Be it 12esofved, that Councimmemder Luke (Distelhorst be applauded and thanked for serving on the City Council. The Council looks forward to his continued dedication and service to the citizens of Edmonds. Passed, Approved, andAdopted this 16th day of November, 2021. Mike Nelson, Mayor Susan Paine, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember '-1%NI Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Scott Passey, City Clerk Packet Pg. 4 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Resolution regarding The Edmonds Marsh Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History Restoration of the Edmonds Marsh, a unique urban tidal wetland owned by the City of Edmonds, has been a city priority for many years. Countless volunteers over the decades have given their time to remove invasive species, planted native trees and shrubs, and have improved its' ecological function for the myriad species of wildlife who call the Marsh home. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Washington Department of Transportation agreed in July to allow community volunteers to remove chain link fencing and invasive nightshade in the Highway 104 wetland areas under their "Adopt a Highway" program. Many community residents and organizations responded to the call for volunteers to help restore the Edmonds Marsh and participated in one or more of the eleven volunteer work party days between July and September. This resolution honors and thanks all of the volunteers, past and present, whose hard work on the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary as community volunteers to improve its' wildlife, water quality in the nearshore areas, and who continue to preserve and enhance the natural areas in Edmonds. Attachments: Resolution regarding the Edmonds Marsh Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a RC.50tutt"On Po ** 14S3 A Resolution Of The Edmonds City Councif Recognizing Our gHany Residents Who Volunteered To Ne(p Restore The Edmonds Marsh N C O E W Whereas, restoration of the Edmonds Marsh, a unique urban tidal wetland owned by the City of Edmonds, has been a city priority for many years; and ~ a� c Whereas, we are grateful to the ongoing efforts of the Sound Salmon Solutions' Edmonds Stewards and Students Saving Salmon for their hard work on removing invasive species and planting native trees and shrubs along the Marsh buffer restoration over the last seven years; and } O Whereas, multiyear field studies by Students Saving Salmon and the Edmonds Stream Team determined that the o chain link fencing along Highway 104 and an overgrowth of invasive bittersweet nightshade had created an impenetrable thicket, and that this thicket impaired essential freshwater circulation from Shellabarger -- Creek causing 1) poor water quality in the Marsh, 2) flooding on Dayton Street, and 3) prevention of fish N passage; and Whereas, the Washington Department of Transportation agreed on July 7, 2021 to allow community volunteers to remove chain link fencing and invasive nightshade in the Highway 104 wetland areas under their "Adopt a Highway" program; and Whereas, many community residents and organizations responded to the call for volunteers to help restore the Edmonds Marsh and participated in one or more of the 11 volunteer work party days between July and September; and Whereas, volunteers cleared blackberry brambles to access the wetland, toiled in deep mud to remove thickets of nightshade in the water channels, and removed about 40 sections of fencing intertwined with nightshade in a successful effort to restore freshwater circulation in to the Edmonds Marsh; and Whereas, the work of community volunteers in restoring the ecological functions of the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary will benefit its' wildlife, water quality in the nearshore areas, the people who appreciate and support the preservation and enhancement of the natural areas in Edmonds; and .Vow, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the Mayor and City Council of Edmonds do here6y recognize the signtcance of the workof the community volunteers in restoring the Edmonds 914arsh and thank the following volunteers (in alpha6etica( order) for their time and efforts toward achieving this important outcome: Mark Bailey, John Brock Diane Buckshnis, Bernie Busch, Andy Chen, Will Chen, Zhiwei Chen, Michael Cross, Aiden Curran, Jesse Curran, 4(hson (Doak Briana 1Dolam, ,dim Faulkner, Nikolas Faulkner, Greg Ferguson, ,Vlarjie Fields, Bar6ara Ford, ,day Grant, Evan Grey, Waylisha Grey, Belinda Yfughes, Randy Yfutchins, Xathy Jones, �VLarty ]ones, Dianna 9VLaish, Amelia _1714edeiros, David 9W((ette, Bo6 �VLooney, ,bane O' Dell, Vivian Packet Pg. 6 4.2.a Olson, Zak Ott, Lynette Petrie, Brook Roberts, ,doe Scordino, Nancy Scordino Bob Seidensticker, KatFifeen Sears, Scot Simpson, SoundSalmon Solutions' Edmonds Stewards, Duncan Spence, Stephanie Spence, Students Saving Salmon, Kendal Takeshita, Chris Walton, Christine White, Nathan Zeon, and 9ll argery Ziff. Passed, Approved, andAdopted this 16tFi day of November, 2021. Mike Nelson, Mayor Susan Paine, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember ul f Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Scott Passey, City Clerk 0 ;C Packet Pg. 7 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Recognition of Rich Lindsay 50th Work Anniversary Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Prepared By: Angie Feser Mayor Mike Nelson and the City Council is taking this opportunity to present a Certificate of Commendation to recognize Parks Maintenance Manager, Richard Lindsay, on his 50th Work Anniversary with the City of Edmonds. Rich began his long career the city in 1971 starting as a park seasonal worker. He then was hired full time as a Park Maintenance Worker, advancing to a Senior Maintenance Worker, promoting into the Maintenance Lead position and then ultimately, in 2001, to his current position of Parks Maintenance Manager. Rich has demonstrated his extraordinary level of commitment, dedication, and loyalty through his many years of never-ending passionate support of the development and maintenance of public parks, waterfront, beaches, trails, recreation and athletic facilities and open space in Edmonds. He has dedicated his entire professional career to Edmonds Parks & Recreation Department and this community and his passion for providing extraordinary experiences for residents and visitors is evident throughout the entire parks system. This City's legendary charm can, in many ways, be contributed to him and his many years of service. Attachments: COMMENDATION FINAL signed Packet Pg. 8 4.3.a �17C. l gyv C O M M E N D A T I O N On behalf of the City of Edmonds, I do hereby commend and recognize RICHARD LINDSAY on his 50' Work Anniversary with the City of Edmonds. Rich's many years of commitment, dedication and loyalty to the development and maintenance of public parks, waterfront, beaches, trails, recreation and athletic facilities and open space in Edmonds are admirable and noteworthy. Starting with the City in 1971 as a park seasonal worker, Rich progressed to a full-time park Maintenance Worker, advanced to a Senior Maintenance Worker, a Maintenance Lead and ultimately to his current position of Parks Maintenance Manager in 2001. Rich has dedicated his entire professional career to Edmonds Parks & Recreation and his passion for providing extraordinary experiences for residents and visitors is evident throughout the entire parks system. This City's legendary charm can, in many ways, be contributed to him and his many years of service. November 16, 2021 • Mike Nelson, Mayor 1 a Packet Pg. 9 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 26, 2021 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 10-26-2021 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 10 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 26, 2021 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Susan Paine, Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Whitney Rivera, Municipal Court Judge Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Director Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Director Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Olson read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely, with the exception of Councilmember Buckshnis. 4. PRESENTATIONS AMENDMENT TO EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND ORDINANCE Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty reviewed: • Background Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 7.1.a o The Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund (ERPF) Ordinance was passed by City Council on 7/20/21 as Ordinance 4229, laying out the intended usage of the city's allocation of $11,893,099 in American Rescue Plan Act funds. o Six accounts were created in the ERPF: ■ City Expenditures, ■ Household Support ■ Business Support ■ Nonprofit Organization Support ■ Job Retraining Program ■ Green Infrastructure Proposed Amendments o Three amendments are proposed at this time: ■ Amendment #1: The Household Support programs in the original ordinance were targeted for individuals and/or households earning no more than 40% of Edmonds Median Income. This lower -income threshold was originally intended to ensure that those with greatest need would be addressed first, without competition from higher income households. The grant programs have started, and many applications are being received. Nevertheless, we have received applications from individuals or households with somewhat higher incomes than the current threshold. The proposed amendment would raise the income threshold to 60%, but with priority given first to those households earning at or below 40% of median income. ■ Amendment #2: The Business Support grant program has already awarded grants to struggling businesses throughout Edmonds. One of the criteria in the original ordinance was that businesses must not have received more than $5,000 in prior grant awards. This may have been an overly low threshold since we have received a relatively small number of applications to date. The proposed amendment would raise this threshold to $10,000 received from prior grant awards, which we believe will allow more businesses to qualify. ■ Amendment #3: The original ordinance specifies grant award amounts and/or numbers of grants in each of the years 2021 through 2024. The final proposed amendment would allow for roll-over of unspent grant funds in the same category to a following year, as well as allow for a greater number of grants to be awarded if funds within a year allow for it. Proposed Ordinance Text o Section 4(B) is amended as follows: Account `B" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Household Support" account into which $4,150,000 from the ARPA funds shall be allocated to reimburse those City expenditures incurred through administration of the following programs, in compliance with the ARPA eligibility criteria: 1. Household Support. Up to $3,000,000 for Grants to households —are th nnoi of Edmonds Median Ineeme for housing expenses, food, medical bills, childcare, internet access, and other household expenses. Up to 400 households may receive grants of up to $2,500 in 2021 and 2022. Up to 200 households may receive grants of up to $2,500 in 2023 and 2024. 2. Utility Bill Support. Up to $150,000 for one-time grants to households He than 40 .,FEdmonds Median Ineeme in amounts up to $1,000 for up to 150 households to help defray expenses derived from outstanding City of Edmonds utilities bills. 3. Housing Repair. Up to $1,000,000 for one-time grants to households than nnoi f Edmonds Median Ineeme for housing repair, especially focused on energy - saving measures such as roof repair, window replacement, HVAC repair/replacement, etc. Up to 200 grants at up to $5,000 each. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 2 Packet Pg. 12 7.1.a To be efi ig ble for grants, households must earn no more than 60% of Edmonds Median Income, with prioriV given to households earning at or below 40%. o Section 4(C)(3) is amended as follows: Small Business Support. Up to $625,000 for direct grants to small businesses most affected by the COVID-19-related economic recession. Grants will take the form of individual financial support grants (in the form of loans that are forgivable after four months of performance), totaling up to 50 at up to $10,000 each in 2021, with up to 25 grants of up to $5,000 each available in 2022. Eligibility criteria for these grants will include: a. Small businesses in Edmonds with zero to 30 employees. b. Businesses must demonstrate at least a 50% loss in revenue by the end of 2020 compared to the pre -pandemic 2019 revenues. c. Businesses must not have received more than $5,088 $10, 000 in other grants, tax credits or other financial assistance. d. Particular consideration will be given to businesses owned by people of color, women, veterans, and other minorities. o Section 5 is amended as follows: Section 5. For those accounts that specify the number of grants or the amount of grant funds to be awarded in specific years, in the event that the number of grants or the amount of grant funds awarded in a year will result in less than a full disbursement of that year's allocated funds, the Mayor or designee has the option to award additional grants, to roll over remaining funds to the following year, or both. The City may only use ARPA funds to cover costs incurred for one or more of the purposes allowed by federal law and during the period beginning March 3, 2021, and ending December 31, 2024. A cost shall be considered to have been incurred for purposes of this Section if the City has incurred an obligation with respect to such cost by December 31, 2024. The City must return any funds not obligated by December 31, 2024, and any funds not expended to cover such obligations by December 31, 2026. Next Steps o Staffs intention is simply to introduce these ERPF Ordinance amendments at this City Council meeting and request that it be placed on the I I/1/21 regular City Council meeting for discussion and approval. o Please feel free to email Patrick Doherty with any questions. All questions and answers will be summarized at the 11/1/21 meeting. Councilmember Distelhorst observed 221 household applications had been submitted so far and asked how many business support applications had been submitted. Mr. Doherty noted 221 household applicants were submitted as of last Thursday, and there may be more by now. There have been 26 business applications submitted; the total could be 50 for the year. Not all 26 applications were granted funds as some were not within the City or did not meet the criteria. A small number, 4-5, received more than $5,000 but under $10,00. He anticipated upon Council approval, staff would immediately send out notice of the revised criteria in hopes of providing more business grants this year. Council President Paine asked how many more applications would qualify for the household and business grants under the expanded access. Mr. Doherty said it was difficult to guess with the business grants, but the ordinance identified 50 per year; 26 applications were submitted although several were ineligible. He anticipated getting close to 50 business grants this year with the expanded criteria. Any remaining funds would be rolled over into next year. With regard to household grants, working from the lowest income up, funds are available in 2021 for 400 grants. He did not anticipate granting all 400, but as Councilmember Distelhorst mentioned, as of last Thursday there were 221 applications. It is possible there will be double that number of applications by yearend although grants may not be provided to all the applicants. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 3 Packet Pg. 13 7.1.a anticipated the proposed amendments would allow the City to grant funds more efficiently and to more families. Councilmember L. Johnson observed the initial intent was 40% or less of Edmonds median income and the proposal is to raise it to 60% but still giving priority to those earning below 40%. She asked if there would be additional prioritization between the 40% and 60%. Mr. Doherty answered there are many factors in a household when the case manager contacts the applicant as well as multiple ways to help residents, such as grants from other sources. The case managers have been directed to start with the lowest income and work their way up. Mr. Doherty asked if Council was agreeable to bringing this back to Council next week for further review and approval. It was the consensus of the Council to bring this back next week. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS' ABSENCE. MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON AND FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING. Council President Paine advised Student Representative Brook Roberts is not present due to mid-term exams. 5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO ADD DISCUSSION REGARDING RETURNING TO IN -PERSON MEETINGS OR REMAINING ALL VIRTUAL AS ITEM 9.4. AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO REMOVE ITEM 9.3, PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2022-2027 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND BUMP IT TO A COUNCIL AGENDA AFTER THE PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. Marlin Phelps referred to the murder of Tom Wales, commenting the City of Edmonds and his murder have far more in common than can be fathomed. New York Northern District Assistant US Attorney and Special Prosecutor Steven David Clymer was the lead FBI agent on the murder of Tom Wales. The most noted part of his career was he was the special prosecutor in the Rodney King civil rights trial where four officers were acquitted which began the famous LA riots. Mr. Clymer then came to Seattle and the night of Mr. Wales' murder, allowed 12 people to enter the murder scene. After a couple of years of investigation, Laura Laughlin, special agent in charge of the Seattle FBI, pulled him off that investigation and put two Portland FBI agents on the case. Robert Mueller, head of the FBI at the time, interceded and put Mr. Clymer back on the investigation and blackballed Laura Laughlin. Ms. Laughlin subsequently resigned and sued the FBI for discrimination, naming Robert Mueller and Steven Clymer as respondents in the case. Before it went to trial, she dismissed the case, moved to California and has been mute since. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 4 Packet Pg. 14 7.1.a Steven Clymer was the prosecutor in the case of the horrible treatment of Shauna Reed, a suspect in the murder of Tom Wales. On August 27t'', Judge Robart, US District Court of the Western District of Washington, fined Ms. Reed $25 for obstruction of justice and reprimanded Steven Clymer for his treatment of her. Steven Clymer, a former New York prosecutor where there were problems with his conduct, has no business prosecuting anyone. He suggested googling Steven Clymer to see all the horrible things about him. Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, thanked Councilmember Olson for reaching out to her at the end of last week's meeting and apologized for not getting back to her. She has commented at all but one meeting since learning she could comment on the City's illegal halting of application acceptance for property divisions, possession of trees on their 1.2 acres and forcing them to buy them back from the City before they are allowed to divide their property and build three homes, an illegal government taking. The Council later voted in a slight relief, a cap of $2/square foot of property, but that is still a taking of over $100,000 for their property unless they retain 50% of trees, requiring large trees to remain 10 feet from the homes. She referred to Mayor Nelson's 2022 budget intention for solar power to be more accessible and affordable for Edmonds residents. Trees will need to be removed in order for sunlight to reach solar panels in many areas. She questioned whether the planning department would enforce the tree ordinance for those wishing to install solar panels, and charge homes and business owners for their trees' carbon footprint, canopy and timber worth before they can move remove trees to produce solar power. Ms. Ferkingstad continued, they would like solar panels, however, the tree ordinance requires them to retain and replant so many trees they will barely see the sun or the view of the Olympic Mountains and Puget Sound from their homes. She referred to trees cut in City Park and questioned whether the City paid into the tree fund for the value of the trees removed. The Council's actions have required they pay more to engineers, arborists and architects to rework the application they planned to submit last November to comply with the everchanging regulations, professions that are overworked and slow. The Council's actions have cost them more than money, including precious time. Councilmembers' votes have illegally taken and held property hostage from owners attempting to use their property for what they are zoned for, single family homes. The Council's votes negatively impact those who would like to live in Edmonds by increasing the price of new homes. Forgiveness is easier if a gracious apology is made with an attempt to make it right. She urged the Council not to achieve their agendas on the backs of individual Edmonds property owners. In his 2022 budget message, Mayor Nelson said Edmonds has received more tax income than ever before. She urged the Council to use that money for their agenda instead of taking it from families like hers. She thanked the Council for listening and for the work they do to improve the lives of their constituents. Janelle Cass, Edmonds, resident and local business owner, requested the Council vote to return to hybrid Council meetings next week versus virtual only, noting there have only been a handful of times over the past two years when in person meetings were held and the public allowed to comment which has led to a disconnect between residents and local government. Meetings are meant to be held in person; since meetings have returned to virtual only, there has been a reduction in public participation. In speaking with residents, this is likely due to the barrier that Zoom presents to those who are not tech savvy. She asked Council to include the metrics and data that their decisions are based on, the exact data points and goals that need to be met to return to hybrid meetings. From the people's perspective, the goalposts keep moving with Councilmembers voting different ways on different occasions. Decisions need to be made based on science and data, not emotion or gut feelings. She recognized the difficulty of this decision due to the importance of being safe and responsible and to look for practical solutions to provide safety for staff and all participants. As elected officials, engaging with the public is an essential duty and essential service; it is far more important to engage in the public process than go to local cafes and restaurants. She reiterated her request that the Council vote to return to hybrid meetings. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 5 Packet Pg. 15 Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, provided her initial reactions and observations on the Public Works Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Plans. 1. The public should be informed of where investments are being made as well as where they are not. For that reason, the entire City should be shown in the CIP investment maps so people can see where money is not being spent. The northern most neighborhood of Edmonds was cut out of many maps and she would be chagrined if she lived in that area and it was not shown on the map. 2. Not all investments are identified on the maps. For example, Downtown Lighting Improvements, PWT-44 $1.5M, is not shown on the map. All investments with an identified location like downtown should be shown on the map so people can see where money is being spent. 3. The maps and tables for the 6-year capital plans include investments outside the 6-year planning range, many of which appear to be outside the bowl. She questioned why those were included, doubting they were the only investments that would be made by the City from 2028-2042. Including these projects on the maps in the 6-year plan gives the impression that significantly more investment is being undertaken outside the bowl in the next 6 years than reality. 4. Where are the earmarked funds for an axillary City office in the SR-99/Uptown area that the Mayor identified in his annual address? It seems funds should be set aside if this is to become a reality. Ms. Seitz said she began commenting to Council about trees and has invested a lot and people are sometimes surprised to learn she has a young family given the time she has spent. The answer to why she keeps commenting is she believes her children, family, and neighbors are just as worthy of investment as those that live in the bowl and deserve equitable per capita investment from the City. She hoped anyone could look at the facilities and wastewater treatment projects or parks map and intuitively know that the City does not equitably distribute resources. She planned to comment on the plans at future meetings and to advocate for equitable investment in all Edmonds communities. That advocacy will point out the disparity in specific resource allocations and argue for redistribution which she understood will concern some. It was too late for equity to matter for the Civic Center and she wondered if it was too late for the budget and when would it not be too late to matter. She appreciated the conversations she has had with the City about parks, trees and equity and thanked City staff and Council for their time and consideration of her comments. Susan Hughes, Edmonds, said she first became aware of the behavior of Councilmembers and the Mayor after attending her first Council meeting on July 27t' to speak against the hate portal. The behavior she has seen at subsequent meetings is unacceptable for civil servants elected to serve the people and she will continue to call out the vindictive bullying behavior; Edmonds citizens deserve better. To the four Councilmembers and the Mayor who feel drinking on the job is okay, she suggested they have their drinks in front of them as she proposed a toast; she thanked them for dragging Edmonds city government into the gutter, for approving uncivil behavior from a Councilmember, for not holding Councilmembers accountable for their actions, and for allowing insulting and intimidating language, body language and actions from a Councilmember. The code of conduct states, personal, insulting or intimidating language, body language and actions are not allowed and no signs of impartiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of Councilmembers toward any individual participating in a public meeting. The City Council adopted a code of conduct they do not follow; there should be more outrage from all Edmonds citizens. Ms. Hughes continued, now the Mayor is trying to rush the 2022 budget through, not allowing appropriate time for citizen review and comment as has occurred in past years. Last year's budget was approved in mid -December. To the question of why there is an aggressive budgetary schedule, she said the Mayor does not want the newly elected Councilmember who will replace Councilmember Distelhorst to provide comment, opinions, amendments or vote on the budget. The budget schedule should be returned to its original timeline. This is unethical behavior by Mayor Nelson and Councilmembers. The 2015 code of ethics says to conduct the business of the city in a manner which is not only fair in fact but Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 6 Packet Pg. 16 7.1.a also in appearance. It is time to raise the level of professionalism in the City's government; it is a honor to be elected City Council. On November 2nd, Edmonds voters need to elect people that respect the position. Beth Fleming, Edmonds, referred to the change to the calendar related to the budget process for 2022. She referred to her previous comment, reiterating her concern that the calendar was changed to be more accelerated and compressed in order for the budget to be voted on by November 16t''. It does not look good for the Council, Mayor and Council President to make a decision based on the timing of the exit of Councilmember Distelhorst from his position. The budget is very complex and she recognized the Council took a lot of time with it to understand all the details. She tried to review the budget online, watched the Council meeting and the presentations, but needs to hear what Councilmembers have to say because often the information available from a graph, PowerPoint or numbers does tell the whole story or what is being given up to get other things. It is important for the public to hear and engage in that discussion and she questioned if there would be enough time for thoughtful discussion among Councilmembers for the community to understand what's at stake. She implored the Council to make that change, to extend the calendar to what it was and not force the budget and make people feel rushed. Citizens have jobs and lives and would appreciate hearing what Councilmembers think in discussion with each other. She referred to her earlier comments about the primary election and will of the people that they did not want Councilmember Distelhorst representing them, adding her thanks to Councilmember Distelhorst for his service to the community. She appreciated all the work Councilmembers put into the jobs and although she may have policy differences, she did not want her comments to sound like she did not appreciate Councilmember Distelhorst's participation in City government. She urged the Council to return to hybrid meetings and allow citizens to attend in person if they want to. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, relayed on October 12' the City Council was advised by the City Attorney that nothing can be added to a special meeting agenda; however, items can be added to a special meeting agenda per MRSC. The only thing not allowed is final disposition of business not included in the notice of special meeting. City Council voted to add an item to the July 6, 2021 special meeting agenda with City Attorney Jeff Taraday present. He questioned why different legal advice was provided on October 12t' and whether there would be any accountability. Had public comment been added to the October 12t' agenda, citizens may have been able to provide input that would have kept Council from additional missteps, a missed opportunity. Later during the October 12' special meeting, the City Attorney explained that the $8,000 fee in lieu of moving and the additional banked leave are both not within the realm of salary and working conditions and so those two items need to be approved by the Council as well. The City Attorney commented that this was hot off the press. The two new items that needed to be included had not been included as business to be transacted in the notice of special meeting. Therefore, final disposition of those two new items could not take place during the October 12t' special meeting; incredibly, final disposition of the two items was pursued when the following motion was made and seconded: Council President Paine moved, seconded by Councilmember Distelhorst, to approve both the confirmation and the benefit package as a one vote option. Mr. Reidy asked whether City Council would be held accountable for voting to approve final disposition of two new items not included in the notice of special meeting. The $8,000 fee pushed compensation above the salary range established for the position by City Council. The additional banked leave exceeded the benefits established for the position by City Council. RCW 35A.11.020 addresses the powers that are delegated to City Council. With regard to what happens now, he suggested City Council adopt policy allowing compensation in lieu of moving expenses and additional banked leave over and above current salary and working conditions. He questioned whether this should be done as a general policy or as piecemeal policy that benefits only one employee. After policies have been legally adopted at an open public meeting, he questioned whether Mayor Nelson still needed to ask the Council to confirm his appointment or did part of what was included in the motion to approve a one vote option somehow still stand on its own. He urged the Council to make open and transparent disclosure to the public. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 7 Packet Pg. 17 7.1.a Neil Tibbott, Edmonds, encouraged the Council to move to hybrid in -person meetings with a Zoom option. In his experience, valuable exchange happened with the public present in Council Chambers, both by seeing Councilmember as well as other people in the room offering their comments. Robust feedback from citizens is very important during this time of year, especially at budget hearings and input beyond what can be heard on a voice call is very important. A lot of progress has been made in the past year with regard to safe public meetings and he encouraged the Council to take advantage of the tools available and move toward public meetings that involve more people. With regard to upcoming budget hearings, he recalled when he was on the Council it was nearly impossible to complete budget conversations before the second or even third week of December. He was shocked the Council was considering pushing it to mid -November. Acknowledging he did not know all the reasons for that, he pointed out the public appearance was not good. He encouraged the Council to include more budget discussions on the agendas. Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, referred to the proposed 2022 budget, recalling in Mayor Nelson's budget message that the budget reflects our values. He questioned what the City values were, noting he had not been able to find them written anywhere. As important, he asked what the vision was for the City that the budget was leading towards. It is also not clear how the City prioritizes the distribution of funds within the budget. In reviewing the decision packages, he finds priorities ranging from 1 to 24, all being "approved." He asked how the prioritization process was used and how individual decision packages were approved internally. The 2022 budget also includes $7 million more in expenditures than revenue. He encouraged the Council to have a robust discussion about lowering reserves by this amount, particularly with inflationary pressures on the horizon, noting risk management is as important as anything in these uncertain economic times. Mr. Ogonowski referred to the rooftop solar grant program decision package, questioning whether the City wanted to entice lower income households with $5,000 subsidies for solar roof installations that cost $18,000. Adding insult to injury, the budget for affordable housing is zero, which did not make sense to him. He found the 2022 O&M staffing plan that requests two additional operators for the wastewater treatment plant equally puzzling, especially after the City spent a considerable amount for new, efficient carbon recovery equipment. He did not recall the project as proposed and approved by Council required additional employees. He found the capital facilities plans that the Council will hear about later on the agenda equally puzzling. For example, a few weeks ago the Perrinville flooding situation was categorized as a near emergency situation in the stormwater recovery plan, however, the budget does not reflect that urgency. There are many other instances that he hoped the Council would consider in their deliberations. In light of the complexity of the budget, he did not see how the Council could complete its review in an expedited timeframe; therefore, he, like others, requested the Council reevaluate the schedule and act accordingly. Robert White, Edmonds, thanked Councilmember Olson for taking time last Friday to meet with him, a new resident of Edmonds. He hoped to meet with other Councilmembers soon as well as newly elected Councilmembers following next week's election to share his thoughts. He referred to public engagement and civic education, recalling Councilmembers have heard residents ask for a return to in -person hybrid meetings. He has been able to attend major concerts and Seahawks and Husky games in person wearing his mask around thousands of people, yet he cannot physically attend a public meeting with his elected officials. It is time to return to in -person meetings or develop a hybrid so everyone can move to the new normal. Residents of Edmonds yearn for civic education, apparent in the previous public comments related to the budget, the calendar, the schedule and the process. He implored current Councilmembers as well as those running for office to consider public civic education. This is a step forward in returning to civic engagement as once people understand how the processes of a small city work, they can make better informed decisions and understand how to engage with others in the community to ensure rumors and misunderstandings are paused in place and residents are able to help each other learn and it is not always Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 8 Packet Pg. 18 7.1.a landing at the feet of Councilmembers, Mayor and staff. He was happy to be in Edmonds, a place his wife has always wanted to live. Retiring from the military after 20 years, he never had a place to call home. Edmonds was the first place beyond Seattle that he was happy to call home and he was happy to be here. He hoped he could continue to say that, noting most people say they move to Edmonds for small town charm. He hoped to see what that small town charm looked like after the election season. Cynthia Sjoblom, Edmonds, seconded Mr. White's sentiments. She too wanted to return to Council Chambers and found a hybrid version acceptable. She referred to comments about the budget being rushed through, noting there needed to be serious consideration given to that. She has heard it said that only X number of people will show up to Council chambers or participate via Zoom, and that it is a relatively small number compared to the population of Edmonds. She pointed out those that show up actually represent many other constituents who choose not to speak or voice their concerns. She reminded the Council that they reflect the will and desire of the people, those who speak up on behalf of the thousands that do not. If Councilmembers realize their duty and responsibilities as electeds and listen to the people, they will be shining stars. She thanked Ken Reidy and all the previous speakers for their participation, commenting they all matter and are speaking on behalf of the thousands that are not speaking. She assured there was not just a small group of people speaking, they represent a large group of people. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, said he hoped Councilmembers were listening tonight as some of the comments were totally on -point. With regard to the Edmonds City Council not meeting in chambers, he recalled on September 28, 2021, Councilmember Distelhorst moved, seconded by Councilmember Fraley- Monillas, to continue meeting virtually for one month and revisit at an appropriate Council meeting at the end of October. The motion carried 4-3 with Councilmembers Distelhorst, Fraley-Monillas, and L. Johnson and Council President Paine voting yes and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Buckshnis and Olson voting no. He asked why the Council President was being paid an extra stipend to set the agenda for Council meetings when these things seem to get missed, just like the appointment of the hearing examiner. In January he paid a reconsideration fee for a hearing examiner decision because he didn't receive proper public notice of the meeting. He talked to the Council about that, but the code has not been changed nor has the Council directed the City Attorney to change the code. He questioned why appointments, contracts, franchise agreements seem to fall by the wayside. He questioned what Council President Paine, the Council Administrative Assistant, the City Clerk and all his employees were being paid to do. He asked why this item was not on the tonight's agenda and requested Council President Paine state the reason during Council Comments. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, said she had no problem with the Council remaining in hybrid meetings, as too much has been done which is likely the reason that cases increased by 31 today. She cited things like getting together to work in the marsh and having children carve pumpkins together, Halloween events and parties, things that make people feel better but that continue to endanger people which is the reason it will not go away. She recognized that Councilmembers need to be kept safe or they will not be able to run the government. As a centrist, registered as an independent when she was young, she has voted democrat all her life but is not quite as progressive left. She did not see any reason to force the Council to return to in - person meetings. Carl Zapora, Edmonds, said he received a printed piece explaining the 2022 budget, but it didn't really summarize the budget, did not include the total expenses, total revenues and how they compare to the current year's budget. It is important when sending a printed piece to residents that it include a budget summary. He has no idea the proposed total expenses or revenues or how they compare to prior years. The printed piece did not indicate whether there was a tax increase or decrease. Any printed piece mailed to Edmonds residents should include summary data explaining that clearly. The mailed piece provides links to the detailed budget, but most Edmonds citizens won't do that. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 9 Packet Pg. 19 7.1.a (Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5- 0), COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES. (Councilmember K. Johnson was not present for the vote.) During the above vote, Councilmember Olson mentioned that Councilmember K. Johnson had indicated she planned to abstain from votes tonight. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, stating a Councilmember could not determine what another Councilmember was going to do. Mayor Nelson ruled point not taken. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said it was in Robert's Rules of Order. Mayor Nelson suggested it could be addressed during Council comments. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 19, 2021 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM LEONA TOMLINSON Councilmember L. Johnson asked for confirmation that all Councilmembers on the screen were present for the meeting. Mayor Nelson commented a roll call was done and asked what Councilmember L. Johnson suggested be done to confirm that Councilmembers are present at the meeting. Councilmember L. Johnson commented if they could been seen it would help. She was concerned that although roll call was taken, not all Councilmembers were present. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she found it disturbing that a Councilmember was stating what an absent Councilmember's vote would be. Either a Councilmember was voting or not; there was nothing in Robert's Rules of Order about voting by proxy. Councilmember Olson said she was copied on an email to the Council President earlier today from Councilmember K. Johnson that stated she would be present at the meeting but would be abstaining from all the votes. She was asserting that because that was knowledge that the Council President and she had. Mayor Nelson said he was also informed. Councilmember L. Johnson said a vote to abstain occurs during roll call vote, indicating the Councilmember is still present at the meeting. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said if a Councilmember is silent during a roll call vote, their vote is not recorded. It would be a mistake for the last vote to be recorded as an abstention. The Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) specifically forbids secret balloting. He was not certain this qualified as a secret ballot but the point of law is that everyone's vote be made and recorded in a way that the public can see the votes happening in real time. Councilmember Olson asked for clarification, if a Councilmember stated at the beginning of the meeting that they would be abstaining from all the votes, that does not actually count as an abstention for those Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 10 Packet Pg. 20 7.1.a votes based on Robert's Rules of Order. Mr. Taraday agreed that was what he was saying; one could not have a standing yes, no or abstention vote for the purposes of the entirety of a meeting. He could not speak to Robert's Rules, but did not think that would be allowed under state law. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said not all Councilmembers were notified that Councilmember K. Johnson was either in the hospital or a nursing care facility. She was pleased Councilmember Olson, Council President Paine and Mayor Nelson received it but the rest of the Council did not so they could understand what was going on. Her point was in a roll call vote, if the person does not answer, it is not considered a vote. Councilmember Olson raised a point of clarification, advising that was not the communication she received. Mayor Nelson clarified the communication he received was related to her attendance not the reasons why the Councilmember was not in attendance. Councilmember L. Johnson asked whether all Councilmembers were still in attendance and would the vote be recorded as such. Mayor Nelson asked how under the OPMA and in this virtual format that could be determined ongoing. Mr. Taraday said roll was called at the beginning of the meeting and recorded. If the Council was meeting in person and a Councilmember got up to use the restroom and was in the restroom during a roll call vote, the effect would not be that the Councilmember was deemed absent from the meeting but would not have their vote recorded. That is the current situation now. There is no process for continually taking roll during the course of the meeting and to his knowledge the Council has never adopted a rule that states Councilmembers must have their cameras on during a meeting. Unless something changes, he would assume the Councilmember is present for the purpose of the meeting because they were present during the roll call. Council President Paine said COVID protocols state the minimum is a telephone line and to require anything else, the Council would have to be impose it upon themselves. She was uncertain there was an ability to inquire if people are present but certainly having a camera on indicates engagement. Mr. Taraday said it would be problematic for the Council to establish a cameras -must -be -on policy at least while the OPMA proclamation is in effect because it states at minimum, cities have to provide a phone line for accessing the Council meeting which presumably applies to both Councilmembers and members of the public. If a Councilmember wanted to call in using the phone line, that is what has to be provided by state law under the proclamation and that would satisfy for the purpose of demonstrating presence at a Council meeting. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said under Robert's Rules of Order, it is always appropriate to call for a roll call vote during a voting process and she will continue to suggest roll call votes. In other organizations she belongs to, during COVID roll call votes are done due to the difficulty in seeing what people are saying. 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CITY'S AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH COUNTY FIRE Thad Hovis, Fire Chief; Bob Eastman, Deputy Chief; Jason Isotalo, Assistant Chief; and Karl Fitterer, Fire Marshal, South County Fire, were present for this item. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained this is a public hearing on the proposed remedial measures to bring the City back into compliance with the balance factors established in the interlocal agreement with South County Fire (SCF). He explained the last time this was on the Council's agenda, Mayor Nelson was Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 11 Packet Pg. 21 7.1.a internally deliberating between two possible remedial measures, both of which would have the same cost, and sought Council feedback regarding their preferences. The remedial measures were to either add one 24-hour 2 person unit or two 12-hour 2-person units; both of which cost essentially the same, adding approximately $1.5 million to the existing cost. Mr. Taraday relayed his understanding of Mayor Nelson's current proposal, start with one additional 24- hour unit on January 1, 2022 with the understanding that the 24-hour unit would be converted to two 12- hour units by January 1, 2023. The purpose of this proposal is to give the RFA time to successfully bargain with its union for additional peak hour units while not allowing the transition period to be open ended. The RFA is expected to eventually succeed in the bargaining process like it succeeded in the past, but under this proposal the conversion from the 24-hour unit to two 12-hour units would not be contingent on their successful bargaining. An incidental benefit of this proposal is it would give the parties a full year of data with the additional 24-hour unit that could be compared to the data derived from the two 12-hour units. This data would compare two service types with the same cost and could be useful in highlighting the pluses and minuses of each service type and provide valuable information to the City in determining future changes to service types and/or levels of service. Following the public hearing, Mr. Taraday invited the Council to provide input regarding their preference about a formal remedial measure under the contract. In the absence of any Council direction tonight, the intent is to include a draft letter to SCF in next week's packet for Council action at the November 1, 2021 meeting. The letter would then be sent to SCF later that evening. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled she asked SCF for data regarding the times that peak calls occur. Thad Hovis, Fire Chief, South County Fire, advised he would provide an opening statement and SCF members will make a presentation that will respond to questions previously posed by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and other Councilmembers. Chief Hovis thanked the City for having this important item on the agenda and for supporting it with a public hearing. He introduced Deputy Chief Bob Eastman, Assistant Chief Jason Isotalo and Fire Marshal Karl Fitterer. He thanked the Council for the partnership that the City and the RFA have enjoyed since 2010 to provide fire and emergency medical services within the City. He explained this was originally discussed with Council on October 5' and information was included in the Council packet on pages 103- 260. The RTA reported to the City in February 2021 and re -reported in March 2021 that the Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor (NUUF) and Transport Balancing Factor (TBF) were both out of balance as described in the 2017 renegotiated interlocal agreement. As described in the agreement, the RFA issued a threshold notification to the City on June 2, 2021 and the RFA proposed remedial measures to the City on June 16, 2021. The proposed RFA remedial measures are the addition of one 24-hour EMS transport unit and one 12-hour EMS transport unit. Chief Hovis relayed his understanding as described in Mr. Taraday's memo (packet page 103) and in his introduction that Mayor Nelson is recommending two different remedial measures, the addition of one 24-hour EMS unit or two 12-hour EMS transport units. On behalf of the RFA and the elected Board of Fire Commissioners, he respectfully requested the Council continue to consider for approval the RFA's proposed remedial measures to bring both the NUUF and the TBF into balance during their ongoing budget deliberations. Since the RFA's issuance to the City of the threshold notification and the proposed remedial measures in June, he, Deputy Chief Eastman, and the RFA's attorney have been meeting regularly with Mayor Nelson and Mr. Taraday to discuss and further explain the proposed remedial measures. Much of the print data in the packet provided by the RFA to the City during those meetings is contained in the Council agenda on pages 223-252. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 12 Packet Pg. 22 7.1.a Chief Hovis explained the RFA team had another opportunity to meet with Mayor Nelson and Mr. Taraday on October 18'; the purpose of that meeting was to provide additional data and information related to the questions the RFA received from Council on October 5'. Those included Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' question about the percentage of calls during the peak or 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. timeframe, Councilmember L. Johnson's question about times of the day emergencies are occurring in Edmonds to support Council's further consideration, and Council President Paine's request for data on call times, specifically the area around Swedish -Edmonds Hospital or what the RFA refers to operationally as map pages grid EF 156, TF 157 and LF 157. Those grids are where the cities of Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace share a common border, generally the area on or around Highway 99 to the west from 220' to 212' (Dairy Queen, Edmonds-Woodway High School, and Swedish -Edmonds Hospital and surrounding complexes). The presentation will also address a question emailed by Councilmember Olson today related to peak times and how remedial measures may affect the amended interlocal agreement. Chief Hovis explained the additional data provided by the RFA to the City on October 18t' is not included in tonight's agenda packet, but the RFA has prepared and consolidated the data into a brief PowerPoint that will be presented by Deputy Chief Eastman. Following his presentation, he and other RFA staff are available to answer any additional questions. Deputy Chief Eastman advised he did not have the information regarding day and night breakdown in his original PowerPoint but will provide it tonight, noting although it is not pretty, it includes the relevant information. He displayed and reviewed the following in response to the questions about the breakdown between day and night, explaining he provided 2017-2019 in addition to 2020 because there are some differences in 2020 related to the pandemic: • Day/Night Breakdown for the City of Edmonds 2017 2018 2019 2020 Night 1689 1808 17993 1595 Day 3526 3747 3693 3382 Total 5215 5555 5486 4977 Night 32.39% 32.55% 32.68% 32.05% Day 67.61% 67.45% 67.32% 67.95% Deputy Chief Eastman explained the percentages have been pretty consistent, slightly over 67.5% of the call demand happens during day time hours (8 am to 8 pm) and approximately 32.5% of calls happen at night (8 pm to 8 am). This percentage is fairly common throughout the fire service in the county. He also displayed and reviewed the following, explaining the first chart is the total and the second and third are breakdowns between Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace: • Day/Night NUUF NUUF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Mountlake Terrace 147.2% 135.3% 133.07% 130.28% 157.24% Lynnwood 199.2% 148.3% 202.06% 210.41% 280.36% Lynnwood NUUF Day/Night 2017 2018 2019 2020 Night 145.87% 187.07% 130.7% 114.28% Day 149.38% 172.95% 213.36% 384.22% Mountlake Terrace NUUF Day/Night 2017 2018 2019 2020 Night 131.96% 113.53% 125.59% 133.69% Day 136.45% 140.58% 132.20% 170.83% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 13 Packet Pg. 23 7.1.a Deputy Chief Eastman summarized the above illustrates the NUUF is out of balance during both day and night. Looking from the RFA's perspective and mutual aid given to neighboring organizations, it is looked at from multiple ways, the number of resources that come in, the number of calls they cover into the RFA's service area and reciprocated service. As this has gotten more sophisticated in the last 5-7 years, this same measurement is used for example to Snohomish Regional Fire, number of units sent and total time spent on task and the number of units Snohomish Regional sends to SCF and amount of time on task. That measurement is used to determine whether mutual aid is equal or if one is providing more service to the other agency. If one is providing more service to the other agency, a conversation needs to occur, similar to the conversation occurring with Edmonds, about whether resources need to be added, moved around, etc. to stay in balance with neighboring jurisdictions. That measurement is done with Snohomish Regional, Mukilteo, Everett Fire and Snohomish Fire. Prior to when all these contracts were in place and the fire departments were independent agencies, mutual aid between the entities was measured on a regular basis and adjustments made to ensure one agency wasn't giving more than they were receiving. He summarized this measurement is used with other agencies to ensure SCF is not receiving more mutual aid than they are giving. From SCF's perspective, the above information illustrates there is a problem with out of balance during the night as well as day time hours which goes along with the recommended remedies sought by the RFA. Deputy Chief Eastman recalled there was a lot of discussion about Grid 157 or the Swedish Edmonds area and the potential challenges that automatic vehicle locator (AVL) or the fact that the hospital is within Edmonds city limits and having resources at the hospital dispatched to calls creating an imbalance with the NUUF as a result. He displayed and reviewed the following: • Grid EF 157 (Swedish Edmonds) First Arrival 2017 2018 2019 2020 St20 124 151 255 223 St 16 217 191 117 107 St 14 115 119 101 81 St 19 36 70 63 28 St 15 25 25 22 16 CRP 1 9 56 1 66 13 St 10 6 4 10 7 t 14 15 13 7 St 18 12 13 13 4 St 21 1 4 9 1 St 23 1 1 Other RTA units 1 KCA164 1 ARUl 1 1 St 11 1 1 2 St 13 1 St 22 1 1 MSO/ Training Da 2 FM E24 1 Total 1 561 651 675 491 Second Arrival 2017 2018 2019 2020 St 14 61 38 81 95 St 20 40 50 61 43 St 16 60 61 50 34 St 19 25 38 29 22 St 17 14 12 4 5 St 15 1 10 12 1 8 3 St10 2 4 2 St18 5 4 7 2 FM 1 1 St 21 1 1 4 St 22 1 1 CRP 2 Total 216 222 249 207 Station 20 Station 16 Station 19 Station 14 Station 18 Station 17 Station15 Total Transports in 2020 to Swedish Edmonds: 8,556 Third Arrival 2017 2018 2019 2020 St20 7 14 5 3 St 14 3 1 5 2 St 16 9 10 3 2 St 10 1 1 St 15 1 4 9 1 St 21 1 1 1 4 1 Other RFA Units 1 St 12 7 1 2 2 St 18 St 19 8 2 2 St 22 1 �FFM 1 otal 30 33 33 11 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 14 Packet Pg. 24 7.1.a Deputy Chief Eastman explained the Grid EF157 station order was the old, traditional way station order was determined based on the drive time it took to get to the grid. Those station orders still exist in the dispatch system as the fallback in the event technology failed. He referred to the total transports in 2020 to Swedish Edmonds (8,556) and a question of whether units doing transports to the hospital are dispatched to the busiest grid in Edmonds, thereby contributing to the imbalance in the NUUF. He referred to the tables above of first, second and third arrival which is identified in the CAD data. Based on station order, Station 20 should be the first arriving unit the majority of the time, followed by Station 16. Station 20 is the busiest station in Edmonds and the second busiest is Station 16 so it is not unusual for Station 20 to be on a call and Station 16 backing up. If Grid 157 is one of the busiest grids, he would expect to see the data in the table. Station 14 is the next most frequent arriving first, followed by Station 19; in the station order, Station 14 and 19 are reversed based on driving time. Station 19 is a very busy station with a cross -staffed unit (crews staff both the medic and engine unit). Station 14 has a dedicated ladder as well as a 12-hour peak unit, providing two resources to respond and backup Station 16 and be the third in to Grid 157. He was not surprised to see that Station 14 was first arrival more frequently than Station 19. Deputy Chief Eastman explained Station 22 (off North Road) transports almost exclusively to Swedish Edmonds. In 2020, Station 22 was never first arriving into Grid 157. If units were dispatched based on AVL while at the hospital, units at the hospital would clearly be the closest unit to Grid 157 and there would not be zero first arrivals for Station 22 or 4 times for Station 18. He referred to the second and third arrival tables, commenting the data was very similar, Station 22 was rarely the second arriving unit in Grid 157 and never the third. If having units at Swedish Edmonds and using AVL which dispatch uses through GPS to know who is actually closest, there would be more responses from outlying units into Grid 157. He summarized AVL is not driving NUUF and the arrivals into Grid 157 is what they would expect to see in normal operations. Councilmember Olson commented that last piece of information was very helpful although that was not what she expected the data to show. The data on paper did not drive the point home the way the explanation did. Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing and described the procedures. Carl Zapora, Edmonds, asked if SCF could comment on their potential purchase of the former Value Village site and how that would affect services in that area. Chief Hovis answered the RFA is in discussions with Public Hospital District 2, dba Verdant Health Commission, about the potential acquisition of the Value Village property at 216t' & Highway 99. The property is in the middle of Grid EF LF TF 157 at the edge of Edmonds, 0.2 miles from the City of Lynnwood and 0.25 miles from the City of Mountlake Terrace. As the RFA continues to grow and cities continue to receive services from the RFA and hopefully become full members of the RFA in the future, the RFA views that property as instrumental to continue to provide emergency services as well as tie in with Swedish Edmonds and Verdant. It is still exploratory at this point. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. Mr. Taraday advised the parties could answer Council questions or the Council could begin deliberations on the next iteration of the interlocal agreement such as what services should be included. The Council could begin their deliberations tonight with the intent of concluding them at the November 1st meeting. Any direction the Council can provide is appreciated but if it is too early for Council direction, a letter will be drafted for Council approval at the next meeting which will be sent to SCF at the conclusion of the meeting. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 15 Packet Pg. 25 7.1.a Councilmember L. Johnson relayed it appeared that calls in Edmonds went from 5,486 in 2019 down to 4,977 in 2020, a 10% reduction. If that is the case, she wanted to understand how during that same time period the NUUF between Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace units responding to Edmonds went up by 30%. Chief Hovis answered 2019 to 2020 transitioned into the pandemic and all the things that happened within the pandemic including some people moving around less but more transports from facilities to other areas. That is still being analyzed as the pandemic continues. Although the total call volume slowed a bit due to the governor's orders and fears due to the pandemic prior to vaccinations, the number of calls has increased again to normal conditions. He could not explain why the City of Edmonds' call volume happened to go down during that time period and at the same time other units responded more, altering the NUUF and TBF. That has been seen over many years which is why Deputy Chief Eastman compared multiple years, to show that the NUUF and TBF were off prior to the pandemic and that continues today. Chief Hovis explained one of the things this community, the nation and the world continues to struggle with is what they call extended "wall wait times" or processing time at emergency departments especially during COVID due to the uptick in the fifth wave, more consideration for PPE and hospitals are overwhelmed with admissions and intubations which has put more strain on everything as well as navigating how to get services to people no matter what is happening which sometimes keeps units at the hospital throughout the entire RFA as patients are transported to Swedish Edmonds, Swedish Mill Creek and Providence in Everett, the RFA's primary three receiving facilities. He summarized it is due to the times we are in and they will continue to watch that data as they move forward and hopefully emerge from the pandemic in 2022. Deputy Chief Eastman said the reduction was in basic life support (BLS) calls but there was a slight increase in advanced life support (ALS) calls in Edmonds during that time. ALS calls tend to use more resources so some of it is the breakdown of calls and though there were less calls, they were BLS which is typically a single unit response. ALS calls typically require response of two units instead of one which is one of the other pieces that accounts for the increase and is one of the reasons for showing data for 2017- 2019 as well. He noted it was difficult to explain some of the things that occurred in 2020 or have the time to do further research. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if having Station 20 in unincorporated Snohomish County impacted the NUUF. She assumed there was an adjustment for the fact that it was located in unincorporated Snohomish County. Deputy Chief Eastman answered it was taken into account and there was an adjustment for that. For the public watching, Chief Hovis clarified BLS is basic life support and ALS is advanced life support, paramedic services. In response to Councilmember L. Johnson's question, he pointed out Station 20 is located in a pocket of unincorporated Snohomish County, the City has annexed the majority of the area around Esperance. The majority of the responses from Station 20 are into the City of Edmonds. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what Mayor Nelson's recommendation of one 24-hour unit and one 12-hour unit was based on. Mr. Taraday clarified that was the RFA's recommendation. He summarized the recommendations: the RFA's recommended remediation measures are one 24-hour unit and one 12-hour unit in addition to the current workforce which would cost approximately $2.25 million/year in addition to the current cost. Mayor Nelson's recommendation had been either one 24-hour or two 12-hour units and the more refined version is to start with one 24-hour unit and convert it to two 12-hour units after a year which would cost $1.5 million/year. There is an approximately $750,000 difference between Mayor Nelson's recommended remedial measures and the RFA's recommended remedial measures. Council President Paine commented it was important to see the data to illustrate where there are gaps and times in the evening where additional coverage would be beneficial. She initially supported the two 12- Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 26 7.1.a hour units but now could go either direction, recognizing that one 24-hour unit would also provide fire response. She recognized the need for additional service and liked the idea of converting two units in a year or possibly not depending on the data. She expressed appreciation for tonight's presentation, the additional data provided by the RFA as well as the previous presentation. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Chief Hovis and Deputy Chief Eastman for the presentation and the information in the packet. He echoed the sentiments expressed by another Councilmember that having SCF staff review the information was more beneficial than looking at the maps. To him, this was Public Safety 101 and although there had been a slight decrease in a weird pandemic year 2020, with the continued and ongoing growth in the region and the aging population, he struggled to see calls going down much. He supported considering the RFA's recommended option as the high end with the one 24- hour unit as a minimum and analyzing the data in the coming year. This is Public Safety 101 and the needs, well-being and public health of the community need to be met. With all the mail and public statements supporting public safety, this is a wonderful option to ensure the community is well taken care of with regard to ALS, BLS and fire calls. He understood other Councilmembers may not feel the same but the 24-hour unit needed to be in place at a minimum to address both times of day when calls are out of sync. He again thanked SCF for the data and looked forward to more public safety resources for the community from the RFA. Councilmember Olson asked if starting with one 24-hour unit, would there be any grace if the two 12- hour units would have gotten the City to the NUUF numbers and the one 24-hour unit did not. Mr. Taraday answered to the best of his knowledge, the RFA is not able to accurately model what the NUUF would be in the future based on these two alternative scenarios under consideration. He acknowledged that was frustrating for all because the City needs to make a resource allocation decision without knowing exactly how much improvement it would provide. He recognized there would be an improvement from a level of service standpoint but the exact amount better or change to the NUUF could not be quantified. That was frustrating and perhaps an argument for going incrementally and may be one of the reasons the Mayor did not want to immediately go to the 24-hour plus the 12-hour unit. It is possible that the additional resources at an additional $1.5 million/year will do the trick; that is unknown but it is possible. With regard to the night time NUUF being out of balance, Mr. Taraday said it was true as Deputy Chief Eastman indicated that the night time NUUF is out balance and that two peak hour units would not add any night-time resources. To the question of how the NUUF could be brought into balance if only day time resources were added when the night time NUUF was out of balance, Mr. Taraday said the agreement does not consider NUUF in a 12-hour cycle, it looks at it over the course of a year. Therefore, if enough day time resources are added, it is possible that the addition of two 12-hour day time units during the peak hours when 67% of the calls occur could produce such a significant improvement in the day time NUUF that the 24/7/365 NUUF calculation is brought into balance. He acknowledged he could not guarantee that but SCF could not say that it won't as the modeling is not sophisticated enough to determine that. Councilmember Olson said the nature of her question was not to forecast or model ahead of time but if the City funded a one 24-hour unit in the short term, which she did not expected to have as much impact as two 12-hour units on the overall NUUF, would there be a credit or grace for the fact that the City would have been in compliance with two 12-hour units. Not by modeling but after the fact based on what actually happened. Mr. Taraday asked if her question was whether during that first year with the addition of one 24-hour unit, was it possible the City would receive another threshold notice from the district before having an opportunity to try the two 12-hour units. Councilmember Olson agreed, and if the City did receive a threshold notice that it was out of compliance, rather than renegotiating based on that, if the numbers showed the City would have been in compliance Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 27 7.1.a with two 12-hour units but wasn't with one 24-hour unit, including a contract term that the City would be in compliance if compliance could have been achieved with either. Mr. Taraday said that would need to be addressed as part of the actual interlocal agreement amendment which will occur immediately following the designation of remedial measures. He explained on November 1st the Council will designate remedial measures, SCF will determine if those remedial measures are something they can live with and if not, they will terminate the contract. Assuming it is something SCF can live with it and at least see how it goes in the short term, the City would enter into an amendment to the interlocal agreement that would address a lot of the questions Councilmember Olson was asking. Chief Hovis advised there are intermediary steps in the interlocal agreement that supersede the RFA terminating the agreement with the City of Edmonds. SCF will provide its annual report in February followed by the meeting between the Commission and the Council in March as has occurred in past years. He concluded the data that was provided shows the NUUF has been out of balance since 2017 day and night. This is not a new situation; SCF is trying to address the threshold notification, remedial measures and providing options for the City to consider in its budget that would address both the day and night for Edmonds residents. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to SCF's recommendation of one 24-hour unit and a 12-hour unit and asked where those would be located. She also asked where the City's proposed alternative would be located. Chief Hovis advised the one-24 hour unit recommended by SCF would be located at Station 20 based on the data that shows Station 20 is the busiest station in Edmonds. The recommended peak activity unit could either be at Station 16 or Station 17; based on the data, it would be located at Station 17. One of his asks as Fire Chief would be to have the ability to move those units if needed if the data changed to continue to address the NUUF or TBF or at certain times of the year such as 411' of July, Arts Festival or other special events. The current interlocal agreement locks down the staffing at the stations and does not provide flexibility. As needs change based on the time of year or things occurring in the City such as a windstorm, prolonged snow event, etc., he and other SCF staff feel strongly about having that flexibility. The focus would be to address the NUUF and the TBF. Councilmember L. Johnson asked where the units in the City's proposed remedial measures would be located. Chief Hovis answered without knowing where the Council will land on the options, which are different than the remedial measures the RFA proposed, he has not considered that. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. NON -REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE COLA 2022 Jessica Neill Hoyson, Human Resources Director, presented this item, explaining that the personnel policy provides that the mayor will recommend the adjustment of the salary schedule for non -represented employees to the City Council for approval as part of the budget process. She outlined the status of wage adjustments for represented groups, pointing out that currently the AFSCME and Teamsters collective bargaining agreements are not settled for 2022, and the EPO Law Support Contract has a 3% COLA agreed to for 2022. The EPOA Commissioned contract is settled for 2022, but as this is a represented group that has binding arbitration, taking this group's wage adjustments into consideration for the non -represented employees would not be appropriate. She stated that using "comparator" organizations is often the standard in establishing compensation and has been used by Edmonds for both represented and non -represented employees. The Consumer Price Index for Urban wage earners in the Seattle/Tacoma/Bellevue area is also used as data point to establish Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 28 7.1.a compensation levels. She provided information on what the city's comparator organizations are proposing for non -rep adjustments in 2022. Although some are not finalized, they are averaging around 4%. Turning to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), Director Neill Hoyson made the following points: • The CPI is calculated for two population groups: All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). • The CPI-U represents about 93 percent of the total U.S. population and is based on the expenditures of all families living in urban areas. • The CPI-W is a subset of the CPI-U and is based on the expenditures of families living in urban areas who meet additional requirements related to employment: more than one-half of the family's income is earned from clerical or hourly -wage occupations. • The CPI-W represents about 29 percent of the total U.S. population. • Because the CPI-U population coverage is more comprehensive, it is used in most wage adjustment calculations. • To determine the cost of inflation from one year to the next year a period is established be setting a base month between two years. The June to June period is the most commonly used. Continuing, Director Neill Hoyson noted that the Washington State minimum wage will increase to $14.49 in 2022, which represents and increase of 5.83%. State law requires an automatic annual inflation adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the August to August period. She then explained what was proposed and what has occurred. At the time the budget was submitted, June to June numbers for the CPI-U was not yet available. The non -rep wage adjustment proposed was based on the first half of 2021 CPI-U, which was 3%. Since then, the June to June numbers have been released, which places the CPI-U at 5.5%. In 2020, a 2% wage adjustment was proposed in the budget for 2021 for non -represented employees. This was based off the first half of 2020 CPI-U, which was 1.8%. The June to June numbers for 2020 realized a CPI-U of 0.9%, which means the 2021 adjustment outpaced price inflation by 1.1 %. She said the administration's recommendation is for a 3% wage adjustment in the 2022 Budget. This will cost $151,668 for 2022. Taking into account last year's COLA, which was higher than 2020 price inflation, the 3% COLA would still lag behind current inflation by 1.4%. The median wage adjustment estimated to be provided by our comparator organizations is 4%. She noted that Council may want to consider additional wage adjustments in 2022. A mid -year adjustment of 1% will keep salary levels more current with inflation but minimize the budget impact in 2022. The approximate cost for a mid -year 1 % adjustment would be $25,279. Council President Paine said her first question was going to be whether we will be underestimating for the 2022 midpoint, but it doesn't sound like it because we are already above the curve there. Director Neill Hoyson responded that she did calculate it, along with the inflation rate, which is why she recommends a 1% mid -year adjustment rather than the full 5.5% that is developing from June to June. Council President Paine asked if she knew why cities such as Bothell, Shoreline, and SeaTac seem to be far ahead of the curve. Director Neill Hoyson stated that they are using different calculations, such as 100% of CPI-U or the CPI-W, or 90% of the June to June CPI-U to arrive at 6.1%. Council President Paine wondered if it would add a bit of weirdness to our normal practice but concluded it's probably the best way to describe what is happening and why other cities chose such a high number. She said her questions have been answered and she appreciates the work. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 29 7.1.a Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked why the study used Tacoma, Bellevue, and Seattle and not Seattle, Bellevue, and Everett. Director Neill Hoyson replied that Tacoma, Bellevue, and Seattle is the renamed price index for this area. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said that she doesn't see Tacoma as being equal with Snohomish county, noting that Pierce County has a different wage rate, as does King and Snohomish County. Director Neill Hoyson said there are CPIs that include other regions, such as the Western States or even one that includes Alaska. However, most cities and organizations use this one because it is as specific as we can get for our region. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she has a problem giving non -represented employees a higher wage than represented employees, which she felt represents a poor value for the city. Responding to questions, Director Neill Hoyson confirmed that the non-commissioned police union received 3%, but the Teamsters and AFSCME have not received anything due to pending collective bargaining. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas stated that in her past life, the practice of giving non -represented employees a higher increase would be called "union busting", and she understands there are pros and cons to doing that. However, she could not support a 1% mid -year increase without giving it to the represented. She didn't consider it a fair examination of the value of our employees. She said she has no problem keeping the non -represented at the same level as the represented, but when it goes above that it sets a really poor value of our employees. Director Neill Hoyson replied there are often situations where inflation or wages have changed over the period of time the collective bargaining agreement has been negotiated. She said she fully expects any additional wage increases that the non -represented or other bargaining units received would be addressed in subsequent contracts to even that out. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she fully understands that, but the cost to us isn't just the value of now; the cost will be the value for the negotiations going forward with the other bargaining units. So while they're going to come back and say we want the same benefit, which is fair, she was concerned about the long-term costs to the city. Director Neill Hoyson added that given inflation, whether or not Council chose to give this additional percentage to the non -represented we can expect a request from the unions to address that development of inflation in their contracts. Councilmember Fraley Monillas said it probably wouldn't be abnormal if we didn't do it now and waited to see where the unions landed; then we could get back together to provide compensation or some level moving forward. But she said it gives her a little heartburn moving forward with action that suggests the non -represented have more value than represented. 2. MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT Whitney Rivera, Edmonds Municipal Court Judge, provided the annual report for the Edmonds Municipal Court and Decision Packages for the 2022 Budget. Her report included the following Significant changes in the legal landscape: • Blake decision and SB 5476 o Possession of a controlled substance is now a misdemeanor o emphasis is now placed on therapeutic court models and diversion • Equal protection litigation in Thurston County for DWLS 3 and SB 5226 • Gelinas decision: 600 bench warrants previously issued are under review, including changes to CrRLJ 3.4 Significant changes at EMC: • New judge and three new clerks Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 30 7.1.a Achievements: • Omar Gamez named Probation Officer of the Year by the Washington State Misdemeanant Probation Association • Expanded the classes offered by the EMC Probation Department to include MRT in addition to DV-MRT Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic • Safely conducted jury trials starting in May 2021 • Hybrid of remote and in -person for hearings other than jury trials • Washington Supreme Court Fifth and Extended Order Regarding Court Operations • Probation offering DV-MRT and MRT classes remotely • Clerk window reopened in July 2021 during courtroom hours Looking Forward: • Passport processing restarts November 1, 2021 • EMC Relicensing Program begins November 2, 2021 • Walk-in calendar twice a month on Tuesday mornings • Unified Payment (UP) Program • Anyone with an outstanding infraction encouraged to come • EMC Community Court tentatively restarts January 11, 2022 at CHC Edmonds 2022 Budget Requests/Decision Packages: • Edmonds Municipal Court is requesting approval of our 2021 reorganization for the 2022 budget • 2022 Decision Packages o Assistant Court Administrator and backfill a Clerk - $98,458.66 o Additional Clerk position - $69,553.44 o Reclassify Court Administrator - $31,430.76 o Change elected judge from 0.75 to 1.0 FTE - $65,565.20 Councilmember Olson questioned whether the court reorganization was fully approved by the Council as mentioned by Judge Rivera. It was her impression that it was going to come back on the consent agenda, but she never saw it there. She asked if anyone knew for sure if it's actually approved or if it's still coming on consent. Judge Rivera said it was her understanding that it was going to be part of the budget ordinance and was being treated as though it was approved. It was brought to her attention that it didn't end up on consent, but then she learned it was going to go on as a budget ordinance amendment. She added that she wasn't trying to misspeak, but was under the impression it was approved in terms of adding it to the budget. Councilmember Olson said it would be important to get clarification before any hiring or other actions are taken in accordance with the changes. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Judge Rivera for her presentation. He expressed excitement and appreciation for the work put into getting the relicensing program up and running in such short order. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 21 Packet Pg. 31 7.1.a said that he, Council President Paine, and all the stakeholders who are involved in that process are really interested in making sure that we track and act on the data in order to achieve the intended results. He said he hopes Community Court will be able to kick off in January, adding that it's well -utilized by the community and supported by the past and present court. Council President Paine thanked Judge Rivera for the presentation. She was pleased to hear about the grant opportunities and looking for ways to help support the court's needs and resources. She was glad to hear about starting Community Court, and was hopeful that the court would share any news about grant awards broadly. She said it really helps our citizens in so many different ways, especially having access to court services down in the Bowl, in the business district, and having access remotely and in person. She said providing court along Highway 99 is a real service, along with all the other services the court's been providing, including passports. In regards to the approval process for the court reorganization, she said although she didn't see it on a consent agenda, she assumed was that it would move forward as a budget proposal for 2022. She added that in looking at the changing laws that affect misdemeanors, she hopes the city got it right and that the court will be in a good situation for 2022. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out that the court reorganization proposal went before the committee last month, and upon her specific inquiry was told yes, this is a budgetary item. Therefore, Councilmember Olson is correct that it did not come before the full council, but it should now that we're moving into the budget next month. Councilmember Laura Johnson expressed her thanks for the presentation and excitement for Community Court returning the beginning of next year. She said it's a very unique thing we're able to offer and a real service to our community to increase access to justice. 3. PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED 2022-2027 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Rob English, City Engineer, introduced Director Phil Williams, Public Works, Director Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services, and Deputy Director Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services, each of whom would present different portions of the CFP/CIP. He began the presentation outlining formatting changes to the documents, Public Works decision packages, associated projects, and estimated costs. He reviewed: CFP & CIP Format Changes: o Combined CFP & CIP Document o Citywide Project Maps o Project List o New Project Sheets Public Works & Utilities — Transportation 2022 Preservation Projects • 2022 Pavement Preservation Program DP#76($1.5M) o 6 Lane Miles o 10 New ADA Ramps 76th Ave Overlay DP#78($1.6M) 0 196th St to Olympic View Dr. o City of Lynnwood 0 2.8 Lane Miles (1.4 in Edmonds) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 22 Packet Pg. 32 7.1.a o 15 New ADA Ramps (10 in Edmonds) 84th Ave Overlay Project Close-out DP#84($5k) 2022 Safety & Capacity Projects • Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway DP#80($7.6M) • Hwy 99 244thSt-238thSt Stage 3 DP#81($640K) • Hwy 99 224thSt-220thSt Stage 4 DP#82($400K) • 76th Ave/220th St Intersection DP#83($276K) • SR-104 Adaptive System DP#86 ($150K) • Traffic Signal Upgrades DP#88($30K) • Guardrail Program DP#95($20K) 2022 Active Transportation Projects & Planning • Citywide Bicycle Improvements DP#79($1.5M) • Citywide Pedestrian Improvement DP#85($IOK) • Pedestrian Safety Program DP#87($20K) • Design Assistance for Concrete Crews DP#89($20k) • Elm Way Walkway DP#93($901K) • Traffic Calming Program DP#94($33K) Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2022 Water Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#46($486K) • Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment DP#47($505K) • Waterline Overlays DP#49($175K) • 2022 Replacement Program DP#50($2.IM) MEETING EXTENSION AT 9:56 P.M. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:40 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2022 Stormwater Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#52($312K) • Lake Ballinger Regional Facility DP#54($300K) • Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr DP#55($190K) • Stormwater Overlays DP#57($60K) • 2022 Replacement Program DP#58($1.45M) • Perrinville Creek Basin Projects o Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration DP#53($550K) o Seaview Park Infiltration Ph 2 DP#59($555K) o Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt DP#60($121K) • Green Street & Rain Gardens DP#61($400K) 2022 Sewer Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#62($336K) • Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation DP#63($482K) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 23 Packet Pg. 33 7.1.a Sewerline Overlays DP#64($60K) 2022 Replacement Program DP#65($1.6M) Director Williams presented the proposed projects and estimated costs associated with Wastewater Treatment Plant and Facilities projects. He covered the following: 2022 WWTP • Carbon Recovery Project DP#67($1.16M) Public Works & Utilities — Facilities • Boys & Girls Club • Cemetery Building • City Hall • Fishing Pier • Frances Anderson Center • Fire Station 16 • Fire Station 17 • Fire Station 20 • Historic Log Cabin • Historic Museum • Library • Meadowdale Club House • Old Public Works • Parks Maintenance Bldg • Public Safety • Public Works O&M • Wade James Theater • Yost Pool House Facilities Repair & Maintenance Projects • Solar Plant Renewal: $150k Grant (45%) - FAC (9.6 kw) & Public Safety (100kw) DP#72 ($230,000) • Citywide EV Charging Stations: Add 10 Public EV Charging Stations DP#71 ($260,000) • PW Yard Repairs & Leveling: Facilities Portion - Balance from W/S Utilities DP#45 ($110,000) • City Fleet EV Charging: For 2022 Electric -powered new Vehicles (6 stations) DP#75 ($90,000) • Historic Museum: Structural Reinforcement at roof DP#36 ($10,000) • Library Repairs: West Deck Flashing DP#74 ($60,000) • Interior & Ext. Painting: FAC, FS16, Meadowdale Clubhouse DP#73 ($230,000) • PS Pedestrian Perimeter: Security Fencing DP#38 ($270,180) • City Wide: Unforeseen Repair and Maintenance DP#37 ($100,000) SUBTOTAL: $1,292,680 (solar grant) +$67,500 TOTAL: $1,360,180 BONDS:-$912,500 TOTAL GF: $380,180 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 24 Packet Pg. 34 7.1.a Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director, joined by Shannon Burley, Deputy Director, presented the Parks portion of the 2022-2027 CIP/CFP. She explained that as a planning document, the CIP/CFP functions as a roadmap for future parks projects, staffing, and funding resources. She noted that the projects that formally become part of the budget are the decision packages submitted for Council consideration. Those were presented to the Council last week as part of the decision package presentation. She covered significant projects, future projects, the 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP framework, geographic distribution of projects within Edmonds, the new format for representing projects, budgets, cost estimates, and related information, and the thirteen (13) Proposed Projects. She emphasized that the adopted CFP is necessary to remain eligible for grant funding. Her presentation included the following: Significant Projects: • Complete 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan Update • Complete Civic Park Redevelopment • Deferred Maintenance/Capital Replacement Program Future Large Projects: • Land Acquisition • Marsh Restoration • Marina Beach Park • PROS Plan Priorities 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP Framework: • 2016 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan (PROS) Goals • 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan (PROS) o Adoption February 2022 o Recommended CIP/CFP o City Comp Plan — reference • Parks Project List o Deferred maintenance o Small capital projects o Nearly 30 projects • Grant Funding eligibility 2022-2027 CIP/CFP Project List: • PRK 1: Civic Center Playfield • PRK 2: Marina Beach Park Improvements o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $6M o Renovation to better serve community o ADA Improvements o Daylighting Willow Creek • PRK 3: 4' Avenue Cultural Corridor o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $8M o Priority in State -Certified Creative District o Priority in 2014 Community Cultural Plan o No funding source currently identified • PRK 4: Playground Upgrade Program Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 25 Packet Pg. 35 7.1.a o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $1,050,000 0 Upgrade playgrounds to be inclusive o Goal is one per year o Some playgrounds 35+ years old • PRK 5: Yost Pool Repair o Re -plaster Yost Pool o Routine Maintenance/10 years o Necessary to continue operating the pool • PRK 6: Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $1,250,000 o Improve safety mobility challenges or strollers o Shoreline Permit approved o Easement currently under legal review • PRK 7: Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration • PRK 8: Community Park & Athletic Complex Ph 2 (CFP Onl o Former Woodway High School site o In partnership with the Edmond School District o Phase I — lighting to significantly expand usage o Phase 2 - on hold • PRK 9: Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) o Current building 40+ years old o Long-term planning purposes only, must secure funding • PRK A: Citywide Park Improvements/Capital Replacement Program o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $2,405,000 o Significant maintenance backlog throughout park system o Prioritization driven by community input through PROS plan and safety • PRK B: Beautification Prog am o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $126,000 o Flower plantings, irrigation and mulch o Outdoor plazas, corner parks, streetscapes, gateways, flower baskets, etc. o $19,000 per year in sponsorship revenue 0 • PRK C: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program o Total 6-year Cost Estimate: TBD based on opportunities that arise 0 Property supports PROS Plans priorities 0 $3,094,000 accumulated by 2027 ($700,000 from prior years) MEETING EXTENSION AT 10:36 P.M., COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 11:00 P.M. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED 5-1, COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES, COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 26 Packet Pg. 36 7.1.a Councilmember Olson asked when Council would have the next opportunity to challenge or address specifics within the CIP/CFP. She pointed out that there is a council meeting tomorrow night that conflicts with the Planning Board hearing. Mr. English replied that Councilmembers could send questions to city staff, who will try to respond. 4. IN -PERSON VS VIRTUAL COUNCIL MEETINGS Council President Paine said this item was added to decide whether or not we want to return to in -person meetings or continue with the virtual option. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas noted that as chair or vice chair of the Health District for the last six or seven years, she knows that the increase in COVID cases in Edmonds is particularly problematic, especially with the recent shutdown of Madrona School. There's also been an outbreak at Edmonds- Woodway High School where the football team has been isolated and games have been suspended. With the increase of cases throughout the county and particularly in Edmonds, she believes it is not safe to have in -person meetings or gatherings, whether they be council meetings, committees, Seahawks games, etc. She pointed out that none of the boards or committees she serves on meet in -person. She said people can do what they want, but she does not support meeting in -person. Councilmember Olson pointed out that it comes down to what you prioritize, whether it be restaurants, Seahawks games, or participating in your public process. She said we found that there are shortcomings to the all -virtual world, yet it continues to be an option for everybody who wants to participate that way. She said the last discussion about the hybrid option was more about encouraging the elected officials to participate in -person. She said there is value for those who do choose to participate live, and also value in being able to see someone's face. She felt the city could work it out with the staff who have to participate in -person, and take steps to protect everyone in the council chamber using plexiglass and other measures. The bottom line is that the hybrid option means that you can choose to be virtual; every single participant can make that choice, whether it's the public, the city council members, or Mayor Nelson. We know about distancing and masking, so everybody just needs to make the choice that's right for them. She said the public has been yearning for us to make this an option. Doing the hybrid option now would be an opportunity for the public to be seen and heard on the budget, which is the most important thing that we do. She encouraged the Council to support a hybrid option. Councilmember Distelhorst said he has thoughts similar to Councilmember Fraley-Monillas. He said as one who still has kids in school, and having kids who are at a school that has had an outbreak, he knows how many parents are getting close contact emails. He said this is not just about showing up and giving comments in public. He noted we just heard from our Regional Fire Authority that there still are significant strains on our hospitals, including our Edmonds hospital. Snohomish County residents have been put on ventilators, and there were nine more deaths in the last week. He said there are staff who would absolutely have to be there in -person if we have a hybrid model, and even if that's only two or three people, we have a responsibility as leaders to take care of their physical health and well-being. If one or two people are not comfortable being there, then that's just an untenable decision. He stated that that he's not comfortable forcing staff to be there when the rest of us can choose to participate remotely. He concluded that it's not an inappropriate choice for us to be making and doesn't speak to the current public health situation in our city and county. Council President Paine pointed out that we can't ask for vaccine status like other venues around, and we can't ask for people to wear masks. She said although there are only a few staff who have to participate in -person, they are essential staff who are responsible for making sure our video is working properly. She Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 27 Packet Pg. 37 7.1.a said God forbid if any one of them got sick or had to quarantine because we wouldn't be able to operate very efficiently. She said she is not in favor of going back to in -person meetings quite yet. She noted that there have been some promising numbers for a couple of weeks, but we're tipping back up again and don't have a whole lot of resource available for all of us in the hospitals. She said she is willing to consider it in a few more weeks, but we need to see how this all comes together in the short term. Councilmember Laura Johnson noted that the rates that were given out by Snohomish County Health have gone up by 6%. More than one in four who are eligible to get the vaccination have chosen not to get vaccinated. Some of those who are demanding a return to in -person meetings are the same individuals that are sending us information against vaccination. She said Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood, Shoreline, Everett, and Mukilteo have not gone back to in -person meetings. She said remote attendance is not an option for all of our staff, some of which have young children. For these reasons she is not going to ask that of them. COUNCILMEMBER LAURA JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS, TO REVISIT IN -PERSON MEETINGS AT THE LAST MEETING OF NOVEMBER. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas noted than no other group is meeting in -person and there's a reason for that. She said during her long tenure on the Council there have never been so many people giving public comment on a routine basis, and it's because we are using Zoom. She disagreed with those who say there's less participation, noting that when we were in -person there were very few comments, unless there was a major issue. She said she's excited to see that we have 10 or 15 people every week who want to comment on Zoom. She said nobody's trying to keep us from going live again, it's just common sense that says maybe right now is not the best time to do this. Case rates are going up, nobody else is doing it, and she has no problem with waiting however long before we come back live. She said she had no problem doing in -person meetings for 10 years, but unfortunately she is concerned that people are going to get ill, and we can't force them to mask and can't make them show. We can't mandate vaccination cards and can't do anything to protect anybody. She pointed out that last time we met in -person, people were sitting right next to each other, and 80% of the people were unmasked. She said that was very uncomfortable to be in that situation, as someone working with the Health District there's a lot of contact tracing that occurs throughout the county and it's irresponsible for us to move forward at this point. Councilmember Olson felt the public is really looking for guidance and statistics from us about what protections need to be available in order to consider moving forward. Otherwise they feel like they're in limbo, and we go through this monthly exercise with no tangible factors to consider. We need to know where the goalposts are and when we are going to be open to meeting in -person again. She felt there would be a lot less pushback if we had some tangible goal, or if it didn't seem like we just didn't want to meet in -person. Councilmember Distelhorst stated that if the Council wishes to use metrics, the case rates were 80% lower the last time we met in -person. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out that nobody on the Council is a health care professional, so they are not qualified to determine everything that's going on with the pandemic. The bigger decision maker and subject -matter authority is Public Health. That is who the public should rely on. Council President Paine thought Councilmember Distelhorst's case rates benchmark was a good metric, but she also wants to be sensitive to the metric regarding hospital capacity. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 28 Packet Pg. 38 A VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO REVISIT IN -PERSON MEETINGS AT THE LAST MEETING IN NOVEMBER, WHICH CARRIED 4-1-1, WITH COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE AND COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, DISTELHORST, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES, COUNCILMEMBER OLSON VOTING NO, AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. 10. OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETING REPORTS 1. OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETING REPORTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Distelhorst recognized two of his favorite young leaders in Edmonds -- Brooke Roberts and Owen Lee, who are participating with him in the Week Without Driving. Council President Paine was pleased to hear the presentations regarding the Edmonds Marsh and the Marina Beach Project. She said the water filtration work that's being done along Highway 104 will be really helpful for the long-term health of the Marsh. She then urged the council to please enable their cameras during council meetings so we can ensure everyone is engaged and participating. She said she feels serious about this and will ask that it be included in our rules of procedure because it gives us transparency. She noted that if we're still going back and forth between the virtual and in -person worlds, this is a way that everybody has access to us in a visible and verbal way. Finally, she reminded council that the next meeting would be held on Monday. Councilmember Olson reminded everyone that the election is next Tuesday, which is why we're meeting on Monday night. She said make sure you vote in those great resources at the League of Women Voters, voter 111 resources. Councilmember Kristiana Johnson commented that she misses seeing you all and participating in the meetings. MEETING EXTENSION COUNCILMEMBER LAURA JOHNSON MOVED TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR THREE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED 5-1, WITH COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, OLSON, K. JOHNSON, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES, AND COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas encouraged everyone to get their votes in, noting that this is the opportunity to make those decisions for the future. She said she thinks Edmonds voters have always voted on the issues, so she's pleased to be living in Edmonds. 12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson encouraged everyone to vote and wished for a happy and safe Halloween. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 29 Packet Pg. 39 7.1.a At 11:01 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 30 Packet Pg. 40 a+ a 7.1.a Public Comment for 10/26/21 Council Meeting: From: michelle dotsch Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 6:26 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Return to hybrid Council meetings starting November 1 As the Council had previously voted, there should be a discussion and action on tonight's Council agenda about returning to hybrid Council meetings. I did not see it listed so hopefully it will be added as was recorded. As a citizen who actively participates at Council meetings for years now, it is apparent that a Zoom only format leaves a large gap in open public engagement due to the technical challenges or inability to have Zoom access for many residents of Edmonds. The other factor, especially with a hybrid format, is the ability to have the public be able to be seen when speaking at the podium as is required at a traditional Council meeting. Everyone is to see each other at an OPM and those of your constituents and peers who comment are given a dark screen or only a faceless voice from beyond. It is demeaning and frankly seems to be disrespectful when the format used to show the faces of the public when the emergency Zoom meeting format started in 2020 and only disappeared months later without any explanation. The technology exists in the hybrid model for both options for everyone be seen unless they wish to phone in. Please vote to return to a hybrid meeting format starting November 1 and allow both the public the option as well as Councilmembers and staff to be in person safely with masks and distancing or remote. Sincerely, Dr. Michelle Dotsch Edmonds resident Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 31 Packet Pg. 41 7.1.a From: Kathleen Rapp Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:01 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Fwd: What's the rush with the 2022 CIP/CFP? Subject: What's the rush with the 2022 CIP/CFP? Dear Council Members: I'm reaching out to all of you because I feel we all deeply care about the Edmonds Community and all of its Citizens. Tonight please consider what's best for the Marsh to protect the habitat and Edmonds. Consider delaying council's deliberations on the CIP/CFP until after the planning board has had their public hearing, deliberated and provided their recommendations to council.Thank you for reading my email Council Members. Kathleen Rapp From: joe scordino Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 3:57 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Comments on CFP/CIP and 2022 budget The Council has the CFP/CIP on its agenda for presentation tomorrow. So, rather than sending public comments now, I thought it best to first hear what is presented before making public comments at a later Council meeting. Two things though I hope Council members will raise as questions after the CFP/CIP presentations so the public can hear the staff/Mayor answers. 1. Where is the Perrinville Creek Restoration Plan that the Mayor promised to distribute last March, and how can City staff propose a CFP for Perrinville Creek if they don't first have a Council APPROVED Restoration Plan as the Mayor promised? 2. Why hasn't the 2022 Marsh Restoration CFP been revised (or deleted) to acknowledge that WSDOT is still well over one to many years away from taking title for the Unocal property? Further, if the Marsh CFP was not deleted (as it should be so that an ecologically based Marsh restoration CFP can be prepared in future when property issues are resolved), why wasn't it at least updated to put it under "Parks" (since the Edmonds Marsh is a wildlife reserve) and updated to address the fact that the State legislature has given the City FUNDING (which is what CFPs are supposed to address) for the purchase of the Unocal property? Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 32 Packet Pg. 42 7.1.a Even if Unocal claims the cleanup might be completed in 2022 (which is very, very unlikely), DOE would still have to approve it and go through public comment and input processes under the MTCA which take months to complete. Further, once that happens, title has to be transferred to WSDOT (which is currently in litigation with Chevron regarding the Purchase Agreement), and WSDOT has said they would still have to undertake a public process to address disposition and use of that property (which could take a year itself). ALSO, during the Council deliberative process, Council members should STRENUOUSLY OBJECT to staff or other Council members suggesting Council questions be done off-line - - this is supposed to be a public process and the public has the right to see and hear all of the questions, answers and deliberations on budget matters that directly affect all taxpayers. AFTER the public has had a chance to finish reviewing all of budget documents AND hearing all of the CFP/CIP and budget presentations, Planning Board recommendations (and review their minutes), other public comments, and staff answers to Council questions, AND discuss them with fellow citizens and Council members, THEN the public will be in a better position to provide constructive comments for the Council's deliberative (and open to the public) process - - This is a long-winded way of saying the budget approval process SHOULD NOT be expedited and should proceed into December as it has in past to ensure TRANSPARENCY and UNIMPEDED Council deliberations on public input on budgetary matters. From: Linda Mae Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 3:29 PM To: Susanpaine@edmondswa.gov Cc: Mikenelson@edmonds.gov Subject: Important I am asking the mayor and city council to postpone any decisions concerning our municipal budget until after the election and new council members are sworn In. This is the right thing to do and many citizens are requesting this same thing. It is time for ALL OF YOU to listen to we who support this city. You serve we who vote and live here. We do not want to support a political agenda that many of you are forcing on the citizens of Edmonds. Delay any budget approvals! We demand this! Linda Fernandez Edmonds, wa Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 33 Packet Pg. 43 7.1.a From: karen prater Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 3:28 PM To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Stop Budget Rush I trust CM Buckshnis and former CM Bloom!! STOP the budget rush!! Karen Prater From: Elizabeth Fleming Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:06 PM To: Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson@edmondswa.gov>; Paine, Susan <Susan.Paine@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Please do not rush the budgeting review process for 2022 budget. Hello council President Paine and Mayor Nelson: I am writing to request that the Council President and Mayor rethink the tecent updates made in order to rush the 2022 budget process. It is unreasonable and irresponsible of you to reduce the timeline so as to accomplish your political goals. I spoke at last week's council meeting in thus regard and so you know that I feel this is undermining the will of your constituents. There was originally more time planned for presentation & review, then discussion and to hear citizen input and now it's been crammed into a much shorter window than prior years. The motivation to do so is looking very questionable and that is something this Administration and council should be sensitive to. There is no acceptable excuse to have changed the calendar at such short notice. Please dig deep and try to tap into the long lost integrity that we hope still exists and that your constituents are pretty much begging for. Thank you Beth Fleming Edmonds resident Rec'd 10/22/21— 1:45pm From: Dawna Lahti As citizens who value the electoral process, we have to agree with Councilmember Buckshnis that to rush budget approval ahead of a game -changing vote of the people smacks of an unfair Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 34 Packet Pg. 44 7.1.a move to circumvent the will of the electorate (whose voice has already been heard in the primary). Keep the traditional schedule and postpone council vote on the budget until well past the election certification, please. Respectfully, Jim & Dawna Lahti From: michelle dotsch Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 5:35 PM To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov> Cc: LaFave, Carolyn <Carolyn.LaFave@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Judge, Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov>; Teresa Wippel <teresa@myedmondsnews.com>; Edmonds Beacon Editor <edmondseditoryourbeacon@gmail.com> Subject: Reference to all extended agendas put out starting 8.6.21 referencing the 11.23.21 planned budget adoption agenda item See below for all of the 10 straight notices of extended agendas put out to the public that identified November 23, 2021 as the date for the planned agenda item for the 2022 city budget deliberation and adoption. Also, for 10 straight public notices, November 16, 2021 was listed as the date of the second public hearing on the 2022 proposed budget. Until October 15, 2021, just 5 days ago, all of a sudden it changed... please give an explanation as to why? November 23 now has only a single 20 minute item included on the agenda. The 2nd public hearing on the budget has just been moved to a brand new date during Committee night as a new special meeting starting an hour earlier than the regular council meetings at 6pm instead of 7pm. How will the public be able to even know about this or participate at such an early time when regular people are coming home from work or making dinner for their kids? If the 2nd Tuesday is normally Committee night and no public participation is allowed, why would someone even think there would be a critical public hearing scheduled, let alone an hour earlier than normal? Are you relying on the media to do that for you? The Administration did not even properly provide the local media and general public the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 35 Packet Pg. 45 7.1.a information and date of the Mayor's 2022 budget address, also at an inconvenient time for regular folks at 4:30pm, so almost no one knew and very few heard it. That is very odd as it is usually a big announcement to get the Mayor's agenda out to the public/media and what he is taking from listening to his constituents and putting forward for the following year's priorities. There is still a meeting scheduled for November 23, 2021, so what necessitated the last minute addition of a special meeting one week sooner when the November 23 meeting still allows for the needed time to have the budget deliberation and adoption? Why could it not have remained on November 23, 2021 as it was originally scheduled for on 10 straight extended agendas, consistently approved by the council president with the administrative staff, and released to the public? What has suddenly occurred to hastily change it? For a reminder of the cogent advice given at your budget retreat in May of 2021, your facilitator was quoted in an article by My Edmonds News: During retreat, council discusses 2022 budget priorities, possible shift to two-year cycle - My Edmonds News He also reminded councilmembers of their important role in developing policy guidance for the budget, which the mayor presents in draft form each fall, followed by council discussion and amendments based on public feedback. Under state law, the final budget must be approved by the end of the year. Clear communication to the public about budget priorities is key, said Bailey, who described that process as "telling these stories in a way that people who are paying for the services can understand it." Bailey acknowledged the difficulty of communicating budget messages during an era of remote meetings due to COVID-19 gathering restrictions. "Even though the pandemic has changed everything, the fundamentals have become even more important," he said. Under these circumstances, it's key for councilmembers and staff to be prepared so they can communicate effectively, and in a thoughtful and respectful way, he said. Is this 2021 budget process respectful of the citizens you represent? I look forward to your response, Dr. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds Resident Extended Agenda released 8.6.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting (If a meeting date falls on the General Election, the meeting is held on Monday) Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) FIN 20 min Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 36 Packet Pg. 46 7.1.a NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 90 min NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget FIN 120 min Extended Aeenda released 8.13.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) FIN 20 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 90 min NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget FIN 120 min. Extended Agenda released 8.20.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) FIN 20 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 37 Packet Pg. 47 7.1.a Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget FIN 120 min. Extended Aeenda released 8.27.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) FIN 20 min NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget FIN 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget FIN 120 min. Extended Agenda released 9.3.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Added Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 38 Packet Pg. 48 7.1.a Extended Aeenda released 9.10.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Extended Agenda release 9.17.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget D Total Time 2 hrs. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 39 Packet Pg. 49 7.1.a Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Extended Aeenda released 9.24.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 120 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Extended Aeenda released 10.1.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 120 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 40 Packet Pg. 50 7.1.a Extended Aeenda released 10.8.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 20 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 120 min. NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH 10 min. Budget Deliberation on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 90 min. NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberation and Adoption of the 2022 City Budget D/PA 120 min. Extended Agenda released 10.15.21: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting (my note: this is a regular meeting and NOT a special meeting as the date is moved up for the general election held on the normal date. Please correct this) Presentation and Public Hearing on the Proposed City Budget (2022 Budget) PH 30 min. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Special Meeting Budget Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget D 120 min. NOVEMBER 9, 2021— Council Committees Public Safety, Planning & Personnel — 5:00-6:00 p.m. Alliance for Housing Affordability ILA Amendment Planning 10 min. Total Time Finance Committee — 6:00-7:30 p.m. CANCELLED Full Council Special Meeting — 6:00-7.30 p.m. Added Second Public Hearing and Deliberations on the 2022 Proposed Budget PH/D 90 min, Total Time 90 min. Parks & Public Works Committee — 7:30-9:30 p.m. Total Time NOVEMBER 16, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Budget Deliberations and Adoption of the 2022 Proposed Budget A 145 min. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 41 Packet Pg. 51 7.1.a NOVEMBER 23, 2021— 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Little City Hall on Highway 99 P/D 20 min. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 42 Packet Pg. 52 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of October 27, 2021 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 10-27-2021 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 53 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 27, 2021 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Adrienne Fraley Monillas, Councilmember Susan Paine, Council President Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Council President Pro Tern Mike Nelson, Mayor ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Sharon Cates, City Attorney Jessica Neil Hoyson, HR Director At 7:08 p.m., the Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Council President Paine. The Council utilized the Zoom online meeting platform to conduct this meeting. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council then convened in closed session to consider collective bargaining strategy, per RCW 42.30.140(1)(A). ADJOURN At 7:50 p.m., the closed session concluded and the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 1 Packet Pg. 54 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2021 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 11-09-2021 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 55 7.3.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES November 9, 2021 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Susan Paine, Council President Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Council President Pro Tern ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Adrienne Fraley Monillas, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Jessica Neill Hoyson, Human Resources Director Michelle Bennett, Police Chief At 4:15 p.m., the Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Council President Paine. The Council utilized the Zoom online meeting platform to conduct this meeting. 2. CLOSED SESSION The Council then convened in closed session to discuss collective bargaining strategy per RCW 42.30.140(4)(A). ADJOURN At 5:00 p.m., the closed session concluded and the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 9, 2021 Page 1 Packet Pg. 56 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Approval of claim checks, payroll checks and direct deposit. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #249979 through #250068 dated November 10, 2021 for $536,223.41. Approval of kelly day buy back checks #64840 through #64870 dated October 28, 2021 for $41,467.01, payroll check #64879 for $934.73 and payroll direct deposit of $3,701.88 Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks, payroll checks and direct deposit. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 11-10-21 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 11-10-21 payroll kelly day payroll summary 1 payroll summary 2 Packet Pg. 57 7.4.a vchlist 11 /10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N o Q. a� Amoun -0 U 249979 11/10/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC CM-2-1588 CM-2-1588 - INV-2-13747 - RETURN L_ RETURNED BELT - DID NOT NEED 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 -39.9� 10.1 % Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 -4.0z U INV-2-13603 INV-2-13603 - EDMONDS PD DANI 2 - S/S POLO SHIRTS t U 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 90.0( p 2 - NAME TAPES `>+ 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 �a 16.0( 0- 2 - CUSTOM EMBROIDERY vi 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 24.0( u HEAT PRESS HNT LOGO - SHIRT 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 20.0( E PROWOOL FLEXFIT CAP 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 _M 13.9� CUSTOM EMBROIDERY- HAT o 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 12.0( NAME TAPE EMBROIDERY - HAT o 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 8.0( a 10.1 % Sales Tax Q 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 18.5� INV-2-13747 INV-2-13747 - EDMONDS PD - T.SM N INNER BELT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.9� 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 4.0z INV-2-14188 INV 2 14188 EDMONDS PD TRIM BAYLY UNIFORM HAT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 114.9E 10.1 % Sales Tax E t 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 11.6" INV-2-14310 INV-2-14310 - EDMONDS PD - GILG 2 NAME TAPES - EXTERNAL Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun 0- a� 249979 11/10/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued) 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 16.0( L 2 VELCRO =a 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 12.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax M 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 2.8< Y Total: 359.91 t U 249980 11/10/2021 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-92096 SWAHILI INT 1A0326341 — SWAHILI INT 1A0326341 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 170.0( a Total: 170.0( vi 249981 11/10/2021 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 80562 FIRE STATION 17 - ANNUAL FIRE Al FIRE STATION 17 - ANNUAL FIRE Al U 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 765.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax @ 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 U 79.5E w Total: 844.5E c �a 249982 11/10/2021 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 142433285 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 0 L ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 122CL Q. 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 129.0E Q 142433286 FIRE INSPECTION CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12 c 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 84.8£ Total: 213.9' 249983 11/10/2021 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10780 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- E MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- 2 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 116,917.9, Total: 116,917.9,' y E 249984 11/10/2021 001528 AM TEST INC 124263 WWTP: SAMPLE #21-A0015623-156 SAMPLE #21-A0015623-15629 ca 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 435.0( Q 124264 WWTP: SAMPLE #21-A0015630 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 249984 11/10/2021 001528 AM TEST INC (Continued) SAMPLE #21-A0015630 a) 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 110.0( 73 Total: 545.0( ea 249985 11/10/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 656000134052 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE Y PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE U 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6' r PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 o 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE a 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' vi PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1- t PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' . PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE U 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ 0 10.4% Sales Tax 'R 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3' c 10.4% Sales Tax a 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6 1 Q 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.61 N 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, 10.4% Sales Tax N 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, E 10.4% Sales Tax f° 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 U 0.3< +; 656000135095 WWTP: 11/3/21 UNIFORMSJOWEL Mats/Towels $47.88 + $4.99 tax = $5 E 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 52.81 3 lab coats @ $17.each = $0.51 + tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.5E Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun 249985 11/10/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 656000135101 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE L PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE =a 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 64.5- 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.7( Y Total: 160.11 40) t U 249986 11/10/2021 071377 ARGUELLES, ERIN HMP ARGUELLES HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT C — HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT C 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 660.0( a Total: 660.0( vi 249987 11/10/2021 064452 ARMSTRONG SERVICES 10269 WWTP:10/2021 JANITORIAL & COV 10/2021 JANITORIAL SERVICE U 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 944.0( E Total: 944.0( @ U 249988 11/10/2021 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 83860 E191 PO - REFLECTIVE LETTERING w E191 PO - REFLECTIVE LETTERING _0 > 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,093.0( o 10.4% Sales Tax a 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 113.E , Q Total : 1,206.61, N 249989 11/10/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 122190 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 2463 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 172.3" UB Outsourcing area Printing 2463 E 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 172.3" u UB Outsourcing area Printing 2463 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 177.5z UB Outsourcing area Postage 2463 E t 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 525.4" UB Outsourcing area Postage 2463 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 525.4" Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 11 /10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun 0- a� 249989 11/10/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 10.25% Sales Tax L 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 17.6E 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 17.6E fd 10.25% Sales Tax Y 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 U 18.2( t 122198 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS U UB Outsourcing area Printing 1742 0 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 121.8 � `5% UB Outsourcing area Printing 1742 a 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 121.8 1 vi UB Outsourcing area Printing 1742 �U 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 125.5E UB Outsourcing area Postage 1742 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 369.9E 'E UB Outsourcing area Postage 1742 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 369.9� o 10.25% Sales Tax �a 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 12.4� o L 10.25% Sales Tax a 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 12.4� Q .. 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 12.8 1 N 122233 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 437 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 30.5 UB Outsourcing area Printing 437 E 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 30.5 u UB Outsourcing area Printing 437 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 31.5( W UB Outsourcing area Postage 437 t 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 115.8" UB Outsourcing area Postage 437 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 115.8( Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 6 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 249989 11/10/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.1 , 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 3.1 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3.2, Total: 3,107.31 249990 11/10/2021 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 74762 ROUGH BOX - FORGHANI ROUGH BOX - FORGHANI 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 627.0( Tota I : 627.0( 249991 11/10/2021 071174 AXON ENTERPRISE INC AA21-062021-0128-084 INVAA21-062021-0128-0084 KERN AXON CONFERENCE 2021 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 249.5( Total : 249.5( 249992 11/10/2021 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 67096 SPANISH INT lA0436622 SPANISH INT 1A0436622 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 67212 SPANISH INT lA0687343 SPANISH INT lA0687343 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( Total : 200.0( 249993 11/10/2021 078377 BENNETT, MICHELLE BENNETT 11/21 BENNETT AXON CONF PER DIEM - PER DIEM - PHOENIX AZ 11/1-11/3 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 114.7E Total : 114.7E 249994 11/10/2021 078753 BESIMA & VANJA STEGIC 4-43800 #21-254427 UTILITY REFUND #21-254427 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 407.6E Tota I : 407.6f Page: 6 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 249995 11/10/2021 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 0016011 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 567.30 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 567.30 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1278884 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 665.80 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 665.80 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Tota I : 249996 11/10/2021 075025 BRANDING IRON LLC 13829 HOLIDAY MARKET POSTER PRINTI HOLIDAY MARKET POSTER PRINTI 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Tota I : 249997 11/10/2021 000935 BROMAN, MINDYA BROMAN 11/21 BROMAN AXON CONF PER DIEM - I PER DIEM PHOENIXAZ 11/1-11/3/21 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total 249998 11/10/2021 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY CG103700 PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 RN10211003 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Tota I : 249999 11/10/2021 019215 CITYOF LYNNWOOD 17401 WWTP: 8/2021 M/O+SEWER 8/2021 M/O & SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 17402 WWTP:9/2021 M/O+SEWER 9/2021 M/O & SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 7.4.a Page: 7 .N 0 Amoun Q- a� U p 1,243.2, R 1,432.6E 2,675.85 t U 0 110.4( a 110.4( vi U d t U 91.5( E 91.5( .@ U 4- 0 �a 188.5( o a 0. 19.6- Q N 0 60.0( 6.21 E 274.3E v c aD 42,307.0( E 42,307.0( Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 249999 11/10/2021 019215 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD (Continued) Total : 84,614.0( m 250000 11/10/2021 077126 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 3066945 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 4,699.9z Total : 4,699.9z Y v 250001 11/10/2021 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC NOV-2021 C/A CITYOFED00001 t Nov-2021 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 661.5� o Total: 661.55 M a 250002 11/10/2021 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl vi CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� U 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 140.2 U 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF E MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF M 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 140.2, w Total: 280.5z 0 250003 11/10/2021 078378 CONSERVATION TECHNIX INC 1009 PROS PLAN PROFESSIONAL SERV 'R p PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPA L a 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 8,365.5, Q Total: 8,365.51, N 250004 11 /10/2021 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 22-WAR045513-1 STORMWATER PERMIT 2022- WAR o STORMWATER PERMIT 2022- WAR 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 37,973.1 £ N Total : 37,973.11 E 250005 11/10/2021 071842 EATON CORPORATION 58059441 WWTP: PO 671 CLEAN/TEST MAGN U PO 671 CLEAN/TEST MAGNUM BRE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 4,750.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 U 494.0( Total : 5,244.0( Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 250006 11/10/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 2651 2662 aCtI 250007 11/10/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR204610 AR204615 AR205239 PO # Description/Account PM: KEY STEM PM: KEY STEM 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total INV AR204610 - ACCT MK5031 - EDI 10/21 - A12434&A12435 BW COPIE 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10/21 - All 2434&A12435 CLR COPIE 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 CONTRACT CHARGES contract charges 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 DSD B/W AND COLOR COPIES ON DSD B/W and Color copies on Canor 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 7.4.a Page: 9 .N 0 Amoun Q- a� v P 13.4, 1.4( N Y V m t 13.9� u 0 1.4E `5 M a U) 94.8z U aD t 9.8( U 134.9E •@ U 4- 0 M 37.1 E o L a 148.8E Q 19.3E 0 209.2, N E 21.7E 2 U c aD 98.0E E t 10.2E 20 544.55 Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 250008 11/10/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH942317 ORD. 4236-4237 ord. 4236-4237 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 Tota I : 250009 11/10/2021 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 9889734 WWTP: PO 695 GPF 186-1 ROYAL 1 PO 695 GPF 186-1 ROYAL 1.0 FV 1A 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total 250010 11/10/2021 062193 FIELD INSTRUMENTS & CONTROLS 178765 WWTP: PO 677 LEVEL SWITCH, CP PO 677 LEVEL SWITCH, CABLE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total 250011 11/10/2021 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 47114 EOFB SERVICES THRU 10/24/21 EOFB SERVICES THRU 10/24/21 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 Total 250012 11/10/2021 078751 GERHARD PRETORIUS 8-50069 STORM DRAIN OVERPAYMENT REF Storm Drain overpayment refund- 411.000.233.000 Tota I : 250013 11/10/2021 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 14122 PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 Tota I : 250014 11/10/2021 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10093254 PM: ELECTRICAL TAPE, HOSE CLA 7.4.a Page: 10 Page: 10 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 250014 11/10/2021 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS (Continued) 250015 11/10/2021 072627 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC 250016 11/10/2021 075265 KBA INC 250017 11/10/2021 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC 250018 11/10/2021 077229 KERN, KARLY 7014194 3006263 9521 9523 KERN 11/21 PO # Description/Account PM: ELECTRICAL TAPE, HOSE CLA 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT Monthly 911 database maint 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total EOMA SERVICES THRU 10/31/21 EOMA SERVICES THRU 10/31/21 332.100.64.594.76.41.00 EOMA SERVICES THRU 10/31/21 125.000.68.595.61.41.00 Total E183PO - PARTS E183PO - PARTS 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 UNIT 397 - PARTS UNIT 397 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total KERN PER DIEM AXON CONF - PH( 7.4.a Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 12 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 250018 11/10/2021 077229 KERN, KARLY (Continued) PER DIEM PHOENIXAZ 11/1-11/3/21 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 60.5( Total : 60.5( 250019 11/10/2021 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 2021-1084 REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 7,611.2E Total : 7,611.2E 250020 11/10/2021 078752 LUZ TORRES-MARQUEZ 3-27425 #21-255524 UTILITY REFUND #21-255524 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 139.5( Total : 139.5E 250021 11/10/2021 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 5096602 PM SUPPLIES: GROMMET, FUEL FI PM SUPPLIES: GROMMET, FUEL FI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 17.6< 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.& Total: 19.4E 250022 11/10/2021 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0145751 PUBLIC SAFETY - PAINT PUBLIC SAFETY - PAINT 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 149.8z 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 15.5E Total: 165.4, 250023 11/10/2021 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0259169 UNIT 23 - PARTS UNIT 23 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 248.9� 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 25.8� Tota I : 274.8f 250024 11/10/2021 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 361719 CEMETERY: TRIMMER, BACK PACK Page: 12 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 250024 11/10/2021 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC (Continued) CEMETERY: TRIMMER, BACK PACK 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 959.4z 10.4% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 99.7E 362141 CEMETERY: OIL CEMETERY: OIL 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 56.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 5.8E Total : 1,121.6( 250025 11/10/2021 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3276-937064 UNIT 9 - PARTS/ FUEL FILTER UNIT 9 - PARTS/ FUEL FILTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.2, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.3� Total : 14.61 250026 11/10/2021 074798 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE MK570211-HIR P&R: HUMAN SERVICES PEDESTAI P&R: HUMAN SERVICES PEDESTAI 001.000.63.557.20.35.00 1,224.3( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.63.557.20.35.00 127.3< Total: 1,351.6: 250027 11/10/2021 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0633904-IN SEWER - SUPPLIES SEWER - SUPPLIES 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 220.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 22.8E Tota I : 242.8f 250028 11/10/2021 067694 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO. PSCS0680917 WWTP: PO 684 BATTERIES PO 684 BATTERIES 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1,285.0( Page: 13 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 250028 11/10/2021 067694 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # (Continued) 250029 11/10/2021 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S011217120.005 250030 11/10/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 205917197001 250031 11/10/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER October, 2021 Description/Account Misc Charges 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: MODULE MODULE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total : Total INV 205917197001 ACCT 90520437 PUBLIC WORKS - SUPPLIES/ SOAF 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 7.4.a Page: 14 .N 0 Amoun 0- a� U P 275.0( 162.2, fd 1,722.2' m t U 0 503.3( �a a 52.3z vi 555.6' d t E 97.9� 2 w 10.1� 0 108.1f c L Q Q. Q 283.3E N 0 5,384.2E 510.5( �a 37.61 c 1,446.9, E t 140.2 , Q 567.5, Page: 14 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 250031 11/10/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 250032 11/10/2021 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 0001520 0001530 0002930 0021400 0026390 250033 11/10/2021 077041 ON TARGET SOLUTIONS GROUP INC 2844 7.4.a Page: 15 .N 0 PO # Description/Account Amoun Q- a� Traumatic Brain Injury U L 001.000.237.260 262.01 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 179.3, fd WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 213.5� t DNA Database Acct U 001.000.237.400 41.3, 0 Total: 9,066.8E a PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1 vi PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S\ Y U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 21.0E t CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW E 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 49.1 < CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; c CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; '@ 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 82.21 c SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 a SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 Q- Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI N FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI o 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 323.2z PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 23.1 , .2 Total: 522.0' U c INV 2844 EDMONDS PD - HWANG - 0 LEADERSHIP FOR LE - HWANG t 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 175.0( Total : 175.0( Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 250034 11/10/2021 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-169359 UNIT 14 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER UNIT 14 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 250035 11/10/2021 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY 38436 SECURITY OCT 21 SECURITY OCT 21 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 Total 250036 11/10/2021 071488 PARENTMAP 2021-79827 TOURISM PROMOTION MARKETIN( TOURISM PROMOTION MARKETIN( 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 Total 250037 11/10/2021 027450 PAWS SEPT 2021 SEPT 2021 -ANIMAL SHELTERING- 10 ANMLS @a $207 & $35 CRED X2 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Tota I : 250038 11/10/2021 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 42022 INV 42022 EDMONDS PD - OCTOBE WEB -BASED PEP TEST 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Tota I : 250039 11/10/2021 074793 PETDATA INC 10156 INV 10156 -OCT 2021 -EDMONDS F 18 ONE YR PET LICENSES 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total 250040 11/10/2021 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS 2021-38 INV 2021-38 - EDMONDS PD - HWAI SUMMER WT JUMPSUIT- PICKED L 001.000.41.521.26.24.00 8.6% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.24.00 7.4.a Page: 16 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun 250040 11/10/2021 071783 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS (Continued) Total : 559.25 0 250041 11/10/2021 064167 POLLARD WATER WP022154 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,293.9E 10.4% Sales Tax (n 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 134.51 g Total: 1,428.5: r- 250042 11/10/2021 075769 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC N9109996 MAIL POSTAGE LEASE CHARGES 1 0 mail postage lease charges 11/23/21 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1,985.2, a 10.4% Sales Tax � 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 206.4, Q N9116540 MAIL SOFTWARE NOV 29, 2021 - FI mail software nov 29, 2021 - feb 27, E 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 192.0( 2 10.4% Sales Tax ,- 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 19.9 1 c Total: 2,403.6E c L 250043 11/10/2021 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 156371 INV 156371 - CS 21-25074 - EDMON a Q. TOW GRAY HONDA - CS 21-25074 Q 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 184.0( 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.3, Total: 203.3, 250044 11/10/2021 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000055236 STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS E STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS 2 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 4,695.2( Total: 4,695.2( y E 250045 11/10/2021 078755 SANDRA KELLIHER WEINHARDT 2-21800 #800107RT UTILITY REFUND #800107RT Utility refund - received `6 411.000.233.000 214.4, Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 74 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 250045 11/10/2021 078755 078755 SANDRA KELLIHER WEINHARDT (Continued) 250046 11/10/2021 076905 SAUNDERS, ASHLEY SAUNDERS 11/21 250047 11/10/2021 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 250048 11/10/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 S3-6768321 200326460 200663953 201054327 201103561 201501277 201711785 202139655 202250635 Description/Account Total ; SAUNDERS PER DIEM AXON CONF PER DIEM PHOENIXAZ 11/1-11/3/21 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total UNIT 38 - PARTS/ FAN & MOTOR UNIT 38 - PARTS/ FAN & MOTOR 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15( STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 7.4.a Page: 18 .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 214.4: m L �a 114.7E 114.7E Y U m t U 130.7, �a LO- 13.6( 144.31 he U a� t E 18.32 .� w 0 47.7E > 0 L Q Q. 40.4E Q N 0 35.0, 17.7( �a v 8.6; W E t �a 25.2( Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 75 vchlist 11 /10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 250048 11/10/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M L 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.7, 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W R 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 28.2� Y 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ U 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 3,963.6, o 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( `>, STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 a 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 110.8E vi 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS CaU STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS Cat 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,501.0- U 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 E STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 379.8E o 202579520 WWTP: 10/1-10/31/21 ENERGY MGI 'R 10/1-10/31/21 ENERGY MANAGEME 0 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 9.7; a 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' Q' Q STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.1 , 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 c STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 158.9( N 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 E STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 86.7- U 204714943 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 18.9" 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 ca STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 Q 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 135.2' Page: 19 Packet Pg. 76 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun 250048 11/10/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 0 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING =a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 159.7� 221593742 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W Y 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 79.4< aa) 222398059 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY U 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 78.0� 222704272 WWTP: 10/5-11/2/21 FLOWMETER ' a 10/5-11/2/21 FLOW METER 2400 HI( vi 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 16.6( U Total: 18,944.05 t U 250049 11/10/2021 037521 SNO CO TREASURER 00373600500905 PARCEL 00373600500905 2021 REP E Parcel 00373600500905 2021 Real E 2 U 126.000.64.594.76.61.00 110.E , o Total : 110.61 250050 11/10/2021 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER October 2021 Crime Victims Court Remittance o Crime Victims Court Remittance a 001.000.237.140 118.21 Q Total : 118.2' N 250051 11/10/2021 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2282.1 Total: 2:282.1•E 250052 11/10/2021 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 115848/4 STORM - WORK WEAR RAIN PANT STORM - WORK WEAR RAIN PANT y 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 144.9E E 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 15.0E Total: 160.0z Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 77 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 250053 11/10/2021 078754 THANH TRANG & PHUONG VO 5-14800 #611300963-TC UTILITY REFUND #611300963-TC Utility refund due to L 411.000.233.000 892.4( Total: 892.4( �a 250054 11/10/2021 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 11465 VISIT EDMONDS DIGITALADS FOR N Y VISIT EDMONDS DIGITAL ADS FOR U 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 606.4� 11801 CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE — CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 5,750.0( a Total: 6,356.45 vi 250055 11/10/2021 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 0031 WWTP: 10/26/21 SHIP CHG c0i 10/26/21 SHIP CHG 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 334.9,' E Total: 334.9: `d U 250056 11/10/2021 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 132839 MONTHLY BASE CHANGE FOR SEF w 0 Monthly base change for service on F > 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 175.0( o 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 18.2( Q Total : 193.2( N 250057 11/10/2021 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION US53294 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISI ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISI 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,472.7� 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 153.1; u US53301 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE F. ANDE ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE FRANC[ y 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,339.1 ; E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 �a 139.2; US53869 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 78 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 250057 11/10/2021 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 250058 11/10/2021 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 151026 250059 11/10/2021 078456 UNITED STATES TREASURY PO # Description/Account ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total ; 2019 EIN 83-6459084 1 TAX PERIOD 2019 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 001.000.39.518.61.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2019 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 2020 EIN 83-6459084 1 TAX PERIOD 2020 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 001.000.39.518.61.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 7.4.a Page: 22 .N 0 Amoun 0- a� U P 1,351.9- 140.6( fd 4,596.91 v m t U 0 480.0( 480.0( a U) U d t 56.6z u E 14.9� 2 18.3< c �a 19.9� a Q. 18.3: Q N 33.3, o 5.0( N E 224.7( c 25.2f E t 29.7- Q 31.0E Page: 22 Packet Pg. 79 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher 250059 250061 250062 Date Vendor 11/10/2021 078456 UNITED STATES TREASURY 11/10/2021 075485 WA ST DEPT OF LICENSING Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 7/1 /20 - 6/30/21 11/10/2021 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 1 11/10/2021 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 121-648 121-649 121-663 7.4.a Page: 23 .N 0 PO # Description/Account Amoun Q- a� FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 U L 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 28.0( FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 57.7- FOR HRA-VEBA PLAN 2020 Y U 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 9.9" Total: 573.0( u FLEET - ALL VEHICLES- FUEL ROA FLEET - ALL VEHICLES- FUEL ROA a 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 4,946.5( vi Total: 4,946.5( d PMT 1 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF PMT 1 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF E 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 29,922.6E 2 PMT 1 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF w 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 2,992.2, Total: 32,914.9! c 0 PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I CL Q. PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I Q 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 5,300.0( N 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 551.2( PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I N 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 975.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 6 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 101.4- STREET - 304 8TH AVE N REMOVE E STREET - 304 8TH AVE N REMOVE 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 4,500.0( 10.4% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 468.0( Page: 23 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 250062 11/10/2021 067195 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) 250063 11/10/2021 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0057938-2588-5 250064 11/10/2021 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 250065 11/10/2021 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 250066 11/10/2021 077299 W INCAN LLC 250067 11/10/2021 078389 ZENNER USA 0000049269 Description/Account Total WWTP: 10/2021 WASTE PICKUPS 10/2021 WASTE PICKUPS 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 Total TRAFFIC - DAYTON RADAR SIGN & TRAFFIC - DAYTON RADAR SIGN & 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 34714 PM: TREES PM:TREES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34715 PM: MEMORIAL TREES PM: MEMORIAL TREES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total : 6219 YEARLY MAINTENANCE FOR WINC YEARLY MAINTENANCE FOR WINC 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 Total 0062212-IN WATER - INVENTORY WATER - INVENTORY 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 7.4.a Page: 24 .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 11,895.61 m L �a 74,158.7; 74,158.7; Y v m z U 8,593.7E �, �a 893.7E 9,487.5( he a� t U E 1,609.0( .M U w 167.31 0 Ta 0 L 455.0( a El 47.3, 2,278.6E c 5,170.0( .E 5,170.0( 2 c 0 E 1,183.4( co 122.9( Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 11/10/2021 3:55:51 PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 250067 11/10/2021 078389 078389 ZENNER USA 250068 11/10/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 90 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 90 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 7.4.a Page: 25 .N 0 Amoun Q- a� 1,306.3E m L 42.1E N Y V m 112.9" 155.0E = 0 L 536,223.41 a 536,223.41 Y U d t E 2 U 4- 0 El Page: 25 Packet Pg. 82 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization c560 E21 FB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study ^^44 1 SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project E8FC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA STR 2019 Traffic Cairn E9AA STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline epacement STR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STR 2020 Waterline Overlay i053 EOCC STR 2021 Guardrail Installations i057 E21AB STR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA STR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force i062 E21 DB SWR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program i060 E21 CC STM 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program i061 E21 CD STR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21AA WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program i059 E21 CB STR 2022 Overlay Program i063 E22CA STR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC STR 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program i066 E22CD STR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STR 238th S . alkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) i052 - STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STR 89th PI W Retaining W�Mi 1 i025 E7CD STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing: i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design dolls s0 STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i EODC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III c488 E6GB STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA Jl PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 83 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding ProiectTitle Number Number STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE &FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MBJ STM Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project c564 E21 FE STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector ESDB WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement c561 E21JB 'qF STR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) i067 E22CE STR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) i068 E22CF STM Lake Ballinger Associated Project c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon m013 GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC STM Perrinville Creek Recovery Study SWR Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project c566 E22GA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project c565 STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project c5 STM Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project c567 E22FA SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c EOGA SWR Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 E21 GA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South �c502 E9MA SWR Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services c562 E21 GB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA ENWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STR SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_ i069 E22CG KSTR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) i055 E20CE UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements — -AL c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA qW STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment s026 EOJB PRK Yost Park Infiltration Facility c556 E21 FA Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 84 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR 2020 Traffic Calming STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program STR EOC 2020 Waterline Overlay STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force STR EODB = 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Proje WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project WTR EOJB s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) PRK EOMA� Civic Center Playfield (Desig GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update STR 68 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR i052 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) STR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) STM E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements STR E21AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming ST 2021 Guardrail Installations STR E21 CA i051 2021 Overlay Program WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program SWR E21 CC i060 2021 Sewer Overlay Program STM 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program STR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave STR E2 2021 Pedestrian Task Force PRK E21 FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility STM E21FB -;MO 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization STM E21 FC s028 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study STM c563 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project STM E21 FE c564 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project SWR E21 GA c559 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Proje SWR E21GB c562 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services WTR c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Proje WTR E21JB c561 Elm St. Waterline Replacement STR E22 063 2022 Overlay Program STR E22CB i064 2022 Waterline Overlay Program STR E22CC i065 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program STR E22CD i066 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program STR E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) STR E22CF i068 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) STR E22CG SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th STM E22FA c567 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR E22GA c566 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E22JA c565 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project STR E3DB JOL23 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 85 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number STM E4FE c455 MLSWR E4GC X- c461 WWTP E4HA c446 WFACV E4MB INEw- STR E5AA c470 STR STR STM SWR WWTP WTR WTR UTILITIES STR STR STR STR STM SWR STR STR STR STR STM STM STM WTR PRK PRK PRK STR STR E5DA c474 E5DB c478 Project Title Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Trackside Warning System Bikelink Project Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector E5FD db6,_ c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study E5HA WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) E5KA W3 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coati E5NA solo Standard Details Updates E6AA Jmil s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 9 E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E7AB A i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements E70 89th PI W Retaining Wa E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E71FA OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW E7FG & m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement E7MA Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E8AB i028 220th Adaptive E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements STM .1 E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement W UTILITIES E8JB s02o 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway(3rd-4th) STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 86 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR ElCA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project STR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Play field (Design) PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STM E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements PRK E21 FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility WTR E21JA c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project SWR E21 GA c559 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project STM E21FB c560 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization WTR E21JB c561 Elm St. Waterline Replacement SWR E21 GB c562 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services STM E21 FD c563 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project STM E21 FE c564 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project WTR E22JA c565 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project SWR E22GA c566 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E22FA c567 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 87 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STR E21 CA i051 2021 Overlay Program STR E20CB i052 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) STR EOCC i053 2020 Waterline Overlay STR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) STR E21AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming STR E21AB i057 2021 Guardrail Installations STR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave WTR E21CB i059 2021 Waterline Overlay Program SWR E21CC i06O 2021 Sewer Overlay Program STM E21 CD i061 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program STR E21 DB i062 2021 Pedestrian Task Force STR E22CA i063 2022 Overlay Program STR E22CB i064 2022 Waterline Overlay Program STR E22CC i065 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program STR E22CD i066 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program STR E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) STR E22CF i068 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) STR E22CG i069 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E71MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SWR ESGB sol l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES E8JB s02O 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STM E91FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update WTR EOJB s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment STM E21 FC s028 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 88 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Protect Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E41VIB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA PRK Yost Park Infiltration Facility c556 E21 FA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization c560 E21 FB STM Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project c567 E22FA STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program i061 E21 CD STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STM Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project c563 E21 FD STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC STM Perrinville Creek Recovery Study s028 E21 FC STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daytighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project c564 E21 FE STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STIR 2021 Guardrail Installations i057 E21AB STIR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA STIR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21AA STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) i052 E20CB STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 89 7.4.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) i067 E22CE STIR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) i068 E22CF STIR SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) i069 E22CG STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STIR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) i055 E20CE STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STIR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force i06l E21 DB STIR 2022 Overlay Program i063 E22CA STIR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program i064 E22CB STIR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program 065 E22CC STIR 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program i066 E22CD STIR 2020 Waterline Overlay 053 EOCC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program i060 E21CC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA SWR Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 E21 GA SWR Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services c562 E21GB SWR Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project c566 E22GA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program i059 E21 CB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement c561 E21JB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment s026 EOJB WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project c565 E22JA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA Revised 11/10/2021 Packet Pg. 90 7.4.c Hour Type Hour Class 149 KELLY DAY Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,077 (10/25/2021 to 10/28/2021) Description KELLY DAYS BUY BACK Hours Amount 1,073.00 53,650.50 1,073.00 $53,650.50 Total Net Pay: $41,467.01 11 /10/2021 Packet Pg. 91 7.4.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,076 (10/01/2021 to 10/15/2021) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 0 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 56.00 3,156.78 194 SICK Emergency Sick Leave 32.00 1,803.88 a� 88.00 $4,960.66 c �a Total Net Pay: $3,701.88 U a� 0 a U a� E 0 �o 0 L Q Q Q r L E E 0 L Q i 0 E c,> R Q 11 /10/2021 Packet Pg. 92 7.4.e Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,078 (11 /08/2021 to 11 /08/2021) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 0 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 40.00 1,141.50 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 11.42 a� 40.00 $1,152.92 c �a Total Net Pay: $934.73 U a� 0 a U a� E .2 0 �o 0 L Q Q Q N i fC E E 3 N 0 L Q 11 /10/2021 Packet Pg. 93 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Part Time Receptionist Job Description Revision Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Angie Feser Background/History All job descriptions are required to be reviewed and approved by City Council. The Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Human Services Department is updating the Part Time Receptionist position job description in advance of new employee recruitment. Due to COVID impacts and other reasons, several of the previous part time receptionists have decided not to return to those positions to support the Frances Anderson Center operations. There are two attachments to illustrate the revisions, the first is the red lined previous description, the second is a clean copy of newly proposed job description. The recommended changes are based in a previously inaccurate job description including qualifications that are not related to this position as well as the update and addition of more current job performance requirements and expectations. These revisions were reviewed and recommended by the Public Safety, Personnel & Planning Committee on November 9, 2021 for Consent Agenda for Council review and approval consideration. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve the revised Part Time Receptionist Job Description as proposed. Attachments: Part Time Receptionist JD Red Line Changes Part Time Receptionist JD Revised Packet Pg. 94 7.5.a City Of EDMONDS Washington CLASS TIT' C: DART TIME RECEPTIONISTFront Desk Receptionist Department: Parks and Recreation Pay Grade: H-05 Bargaining Unit: Hourly FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: 10/18/2021 Reports To: Recreation Supervisor BASIC FUNCTION POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs basic customer service functions to aAssist the parks and recreation customers; greeting facility guests, assisting —with_ Glass program registrations, facility rentals and answering questions about with -recreation classes, rental facilities and events. cGollectjag fees and give providing receipts for classes and drop -in use ands" monitoria u+Id+egfacility use to include securing Rd IGGk UP/68GUre building during evening and weekend shifts_.; hours Hours are variable including Saturday -evening and weekend shifts and on -call as needed. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties • Performs a variety of hocin various clerical duties including: answering telephones and greeting visitors; providing information in person, on the telephone and/or referring to appropriate personnel. • Receives/ —processes registration and rental and menitorfees; and provides refunds according to established procedures; Mm niGate with ether nffiGe peFS RRel a needed; prepares receipts and deposits as appropriate. • Operate office machines including: computers, photocopiers, calculators, typewrite and other office equipment as assigned. • Performs a variety of related special duties, projects or activities of a -&-assigned department. Required Knowledge of: , corn i c A. nnu iTiGc: • Principles of customer service and public relations. Last Reviewed: 10/18/2021 Last Revised: 10/18/2021 a Packet Pg. 95 7.5.a • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Proper tTelephone terms and email etiauette. • Effective oral and written communication principals and practices. • Modern office prac#+Eesprocedures, methods and equipment including computers and computer applications sufficient to perform assigned work; specifically, Microsoft Office programs and registration and rental software. • Policies and objectives of assigned program and activities. phone toehRiques and atiquat.a. • Operation Of pffiGe rnaGhines innlu ding G pu ter equipment • Personal GOMPUter SAA.f.,ro innlu ding Werd • Reoer.+_ keeping tenhniguec • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling and punctuation. • RerfeRn oleriGal duties ip suppert of an a ed effine • Rswer telephones and greet the pi blip n irteG Sly • Operg+gr gffi..e a en+ s ,oh as: typeWFi+ers GaIGUlaters and o •Add, ubtraGt'multiply and divide g iGkIy and a rately I • Rderstand and felle .i eral and written directien ABILITY Reauired Skill in: • Record -keeping techniques. • Performing clerical duties in support of an assigned office. • Answering telephones and greeting the public courteously. • Operating office equipment including but not limited to computers, calculators, scanners, fax machines, and copiers. • Accurately applying addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. • Understanding and following oral and written direction. • Maintaining records according to department policy and local regulations. • Communicating effectively with others both orally and in writing. • Establishing and maintaining cooperative and effective working relationships with others MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Education and Experience: High School Diploma/GED Certificate AND one year of office clerical experience that includes extensive public contact OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position. ExperieRGe on a jeb that dernenstrates the ability te erganize tasks and werk well with the publiG. Must be able to pass a City background check. WORKING CONDITIONS . Environment: • Must be able to work evenings, weekends and on -call as needed. • Office environment. • Some interruptions. Last Reviewed: 10/18/2021 Last Revised: 10/18/2021 Packet Pg. 96 7.5.a Physical Abilities: • Hearing and speaking to exchange information in person and on the phone. • RSe�Teadinngg a variety of materials. • Ilov' ", of .s and fiRgers to operate a computer keyboard or t ypewritor •_Sitting, standing, or otherwise in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Hazards: • Working in a sometimes --noisy environment. • Potential contact with dissatisfied members of the public. Incumbent Signature: Date: Department Head: Date: Last Reviewed: 10/18/2021 Last Revised: 10/18/2021 Packet Pg. 97 7.5.b City of EDMONDS Washington Front Desk Receptionist Department: Parks and Recreation Pay Grade: H-05 Bargaining Unit: Hourly FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: 10/18/2021 Reports To: Recreation Supervisor POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs basic customer service functions to assist the parks and recreation customers; greeting facility guests, assisting with program registrations, facility rentals and answering questions about recreation classes, rental facilities and events; collecting fees and providing receipts for classes and drop -in use and monitoring facility use to include securing building during evening and weekend shifts. Hours are variable including evening and weekend shifts and on -call as needed. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties • Performs various clerical duties including: answering telephones and greeting visitors; providing information in person, on the telephone and/or referring to appropriate personnel. . • Receives/processes registration and rental fees and provides refunds according to established procedures; prepares receipts and deposits as appropriate. • Operate office machines including computers, copiers, calculators and other office equipment as assigned. • Performs a variety of special duties, projects or activities of assigned department. Required Knowledge of: • Principles of customer service and public relations. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Proper telephone and email etiquette. • Effective oral and written communication principles and practices. • Modern office procedures, methods and equipment including computers and computer applications sufficient to perform assigned work; specifically, Microsoft Office programs and registration and rental software. • Policies and objectives of assigned program and activities. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling and punctuation. Last Reviewed: 10/18/2021 Last Revised: 10/18/2021 Packet Pg. 98 7.5.b Required Skill in: • Record -keeping techniques. • Performing clerical duties in support of an assigned office. • Answering telephones and greeting the public courteously. • Operating office equipment including but not limited to computers, calculators, scanners, fax machines, and copiers. • Accurately applying addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. • Understanding and following oral and written direction. • Maintaining records according to department policy and local regulations. • Communicating effectively with others both orally and in writing. • Establishing and maintaining cooperative and effective working relationships with others MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: High School Diploma/GED Certificate AND one year of office clerical experience that includes extensive public contact OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position. Must be able to pass a City background check. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Must be able to work evenings, weekends and on -call as needed. • Office environment. • Some interruptions. Physical Abilities: • Hearing and speaking to exchange information in person and on the phone. • Reading a variety of materials. • Sitting, standing, or otherwise in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Hazards: • Working in a sometimes -noisy environment. • Potential contact with dissatisfied members of the public. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Last Reviewed: 10/18/2021 Last Revised: 10/18/2021 Packet Pg. 99 7.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Proposed Snohomish County PUD Easement for Civic Center Park Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History On November 9, 2021, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and the Committee placed the item on the November 16, 2021 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Authorize the Mayor to sign the easement document. Narrative The existing sidewalk along the west side of Civic Center Playfield is being replaced with a new 16 foot wide sidewalk. To accommodate the wider sidewalk the existing utility pole sidewalk guy is being replaced with a new down guy that will extend onto City property. The down guy anchor will be located in a new landscape bed. The easement will allow Snohomish County PUD to install and maintain the new down guy. Attachments: Exhibit A - Easement Document Exhibit B - Easement Packet Pg. 100 EXHIBIT A 7.6.a AFTER RECORDING, PLEASE RETURN TO: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Attn: Franklin Bolden Real Estate Services P.O. Box 1107 Everett, Washington 98206-1107 E- WO#100081141 N#10000139619 DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT Grantor ("Owner"): The City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Northwest Fiber, LLC d/b/a Ziply Fiber. Short Legal Description: Lots 21-40, Block 101, City of Edmonds, Vol. 2 of Plats, Pgs. 39 and 39A, Snohomish County, WA Tax Parcel No: 00434210102100 THIS DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT ("Easement") is made this day of 2021, by and between the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation ("Owner"), and Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, a Washington State municipal corporation ("District") and Northwest Fiber, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a Ziply Fiber ("Ziply Fiber") The Owner, District and Ziply Fiber are sometimes referred to individually herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties". The District and Ziply Fiber are collectively referred to as "Grantee". WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain lands and premises situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, legally described as follows (hereinafter "Property"): LOTS 21 THROUGH 40, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 101, CITY OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGES 39 AND 39A, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED SPRAGUE STREET PER CITY OF EDMONDS ORDINANCE #4028, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 201606230342, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Situate in the County of SNOHOMISH, State of Washington WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of acquiring certain rights and privileges across, over, under, upon and through the Property. Packet Pg. 101 7.6.a NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Distribution Easement. Owner, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and grants to Grantee, its agents, contractors, successors and assigns, a non-exclusive easement for the perpetual right, privilege, and authority to patrol, construct, erect, reconstruct, alter, improve, extend, repair, operate, and maintain overhead and/or underground electric distribution lines and facilities, Grantee -owned communication wires and cables, and other necessary or convenient appurtenances, across, over, under, through and upon the following portion of Owner's Property (hereinafter "Easement Area"): The South 5 feet of the North 10 feet of the West 20 feet of the Property. 2. Access To and Across Property. Grantee has the right of ingress to and egress from the Easement Area across the adjacent Property of Owner where same is reasonably necessary for the purpose of exercising its easement rights described in Section 1. 3. Owner's Reservation of Rights and Use of Easement Area. Owner reserves the right to use the Easement Area in a manner that does not interfere with the Grantee's use of the Easement Area, and/or present a hazard to Grantee's electric distribution lines and facilities, communication wires and cables, and other appurtenances. The Owner shall not construct or permit to be constructed any structures of any kind in the Easement Area without prior approval of the Grantee. 4. Clearing of Power Line Right of Way. Grantee has the right at all times to clear said Easement Area and keep the same clear of all brush, debris and trees. 5. Trimming or Removal of Hazardous/Danger Trees. Grantee has the right at all times to cut, slash, or trim and remove brush, timber or trees from the Property which in the opinion of Grantee constitute a hazard to said lines and facilities, communication wires and cables, and other appurtenances or the Grantee's access thereto. Trees, brush or other growth shall be deemed hazardous to the lines or facilities or access of the Grantee when they are of such a height that they could, upon falling, strike the nearest edge of the Easement Area at a height of more than fifteen feet (15'). Except in emergencies, Grantee shall, prior to the exercise of such right, identify such trees and make a reasonable effort to give Owner prior notice that such trees will be trimmed or removed. 6. Title to Removed Trees, Vegetation and Structures. The title to all brush, debris, trees and structures removed from the Easement Area and the Property pursuant to Sections 4 and 5 shall be vested in the Grantee, and the consideration paid for this Easement and rights herein described is accepted by Owner as full compensation for said removed brush, debris, trees and structures. Owner shall be entitled to request fallen timber be set aside for Owner's personal use. Grantee shall make reasonable effort to set aside said fallen timber provided doing the same is safe in Grantee's sole opinion. Title to any fallen timber set aside in this manner shall revert to the Owner. 7. Restoration Provision. To the extent that Owner's Property is disturbed and/or damaged by Grantee's exercise of its rights hereunder, Grantee shall restore the condition of the Property as nearly as reasonably possible to its existing condition prior to said exercise of its rights. 8. Title to Property. The Owner represents and warrants having the lawful right and power to sell and convey this Easement to Grantee. 9. Binding Effect. This Easement and the rights and obligations under this Easement are intended to and shall run with the Property and shall benefit and bind the Parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. Packet Pg. 102 7.6.a 10. Governing Law and Venue. This Easement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The venue for any action to enforce or interpret this Easement shall lie in the Superior Court of Washington for Snohomish County, Washington. 11. Authority. Each party signing this Easement, if on behalf of an entity, represents that they have full authority to sign this Easement on behalf of such entity. 12. Grantee Acceptance. By recording this Easement, Grantee hereby accepts all provisions set forth under this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed the day and year first above written OWNER: The City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation By: Name: Its: (REPRESENTATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT) State of Washington County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the City of Edmonds to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 202_. Signature of (Seal or Stamp) Notary Public Print Name: Residing at: My appointment expires Packet Pg. 103 I 7.6.b I ` City of Edmonds EXHIBIT B -EASEMENT -� Notes 0 15.79 31.6 Feet 23.5 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet ma 282 p' g Aping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web MerCator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Packet Pg. 104 1 7.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Amendment No. 1 to Snohomish County Public Defender Association Professional Services Agreement for Indigent Defense Services Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Emily Wagener Background/History The Snohomish County Public Defender Association ("SCPDA") serves as the City's Indigent Defense Legal Services firm under the parties' 2020 Professional Services Agreement for Indigent Defense Services, which is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2021. The parties entered into negotiations for a successor agreement to begin January 1, 2022, but found that such an agreement could not be scheduled for City Council consideration until January 2022 at the earliest. This item was approved to be placed on the 10/16/2021 consent agenda at the 10/9/2021 Personnel Committee. Staff Recommendation Staff requests that council approve on consent the Amendment No. 1 to the SCPDA's Professional Services Agreement for Indigent Defense Services. Narrative Amendment No. 1 to the SCPDA's Professional Services Agreement for Indigent Defense Services extends the Agreement through March 31, 2022 under the same terms and conditions to allow the parties sufficient time to negotiate a successor agreement. City staff, with the assistance of the Office of the City Attorney, have negotiated the terms of Amendment No. 1. Attachments: Signed Amendment No. 1 to SCPDA PSA 11.3.2021 Packet Pg. 105 7.7.a Of f UA,OM "� Cityof Edmonds Michael Nelson Mayor 121 FIFTH AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 . 425-771-0251 f'VC 1510 AMENDMENT NO. I TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), and the Snohomish County Public Defender Association (the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying agreement for the provision of public defense services dated June 30, 2020 ("Underlying Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Sections II and XXXIV of the Underlying Agreement provide for the extension of the term of the agreement with a written amendment signed and endorsed by the parties; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Underlying Agreement for three (3) months to allow sufficient time for the negotiation of a successor agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to maintain the 2021 rates of compensation for the work to be performed pursuant to the Underlying Agreement for the duration of this extension; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties to the Underlying Agreement as follows: 1. The Underlying Agreement, incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is hereby amended in, but only in, the following respect: 1.1 Extension. Section II ("Duration of Agreement") of the Underlying Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall terminate on March 31, 2022, unlgs3 extetfded or-Vrminated earlier in a manner permitted by this Agreement. 2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement betwe6iiflzetparties 4all remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as 'se;'arthi�i"-ein. � Cry "'ar�r� �,t�1 Packet Pg. 106 7.7.a DATED this cc\ day of Abveotibe(- 2021. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION L Michael Nelson, Mayor Kathleen yle, Managing Director ATTEST!AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF 51 ?0b001411) On this 3' & day of Jjj;)e_ ok16e r , 2021, before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Kathleen Kyle, Managing Director of the Snohomish County Public Defender Association, and executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first move written. NOTARY PUBLI �OT4 i 98275$ s %My co missi/nexpires: 9 yy��I Co?Vs�.� A a e 1 `y 4h .. WA;%k\ Packet Pg. 107 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Public Hearing Deliberations and Adoption of the 2022 Budget Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History After a Continuance of the Public Hearing from last week, this is another opportunity for Council members to ask questions and deliberate on the 2022 Proposed Budget. Staff Recommendation For discussion and deliberation. Changes to the budget may be proposed, discussed, and voted on. A Draft Ordinance is included in the packet, the recommendation is to adopt the Ordinance as presented tonight, as amended by Council voting. Narrative: Discussion only. Attachments: 2022 Draft Budget Ordinance Packet Pg. 108 8.1.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2022. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington completed and placed on file with the City Clerk a proposed budget and estimate of the amount of money required to meet the public expenses, bond retirement and interest, reserve funds, and expenses of government of the City for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; and, WHEREAS, a notice was published that the City Council would meet virtually via Zoom on November I't, November 9th, and November 16th 2021 for the purpose of making and adopting a budget for said fiscal year and giving taxpayers within the limits of the City an opportunity to be heard in a public hearing upon said budget, and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing at that time and did then consider the matter of the proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2022, and WHEREAS, the proposed budget does not exceed the lawful limit of taxation allowed by law to be levied on the property within the City for the purposes set forth in the budget, and the estimated expenditures set forth in the budget being all necessary to carry on the government of the City for the fiscal year 2022 and being sufficient to meet the various needs of the City during that period, and NOW, THEREFORE; the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. The budget for the City of Edmonds Washington for the year 2022 is hereby adopted at the fund level in its final form and content as set forth in the comprehensive Packet Pg. 109 8.1.a budget document, City of Edmonds Adopted Budget, copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Estimated resources for each separate fund of the City of Edmonds, and aggregate expenditures for all such funds for the year 2022 are set forth in summary form below, and are hereby appropriated for expenditure at the fund level during the year 2022 as set forth in the City of Edmonds Adopted Budget. Fund Description Revenue Expenditure General Fund $ 44,168,683 $ 48,704,967 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve Subfund 225,000 260,490 Historic Preservation Gift Fund - 5,900 Building Maintenance Fund - 980,000 Drug Enforcement Fund 167,210 45,800 Street Fund 1,751,930 2,234,676 Street Construction Fund 13,359,021 12,542,946 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 216,701 181,880 Memorial Tree Fund 530 - Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 84,410 100,900 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,540 26,880 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,550 3,000 Tourism Promotional Arts Fund 29,590 28,200 REET 2 2,271,020 4,279,876 REET 1 2,261,030 1,922,273 Gifts Catalog Fund 82,750 78,400 Cemetery Maintenance/Imp. Fund 182,430 220,561 Parks Trust Fund 4,330 - Cemetery Maintenance Fund 43,520 25,000 Sister City Commission Fund 10,290 11,900 Business Improvement District Fund 140 - Affordable and Supportive Housing Fund 65,000 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 4,856,549 1,250,000 Tree Fund 214,800 214,800 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund 611,370 611,370 Parks Capital Construction Fund 3,822,685 7,321,018 Water Utility Fund 11,018,136 11,110,498 Storm Utility Fund 8,277,897 8,638,202 Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 16,001,340 15,656,812 Utility Debt Service Fund 1,988,700 1,988,710 Equipment Rental Fund 1,925,920 1,942,460 Technology Rental Fund 1,153,570 11447,422 Totals $ 114,822,642 $ 121,834,941 Packet Pg. 110 8.1.a Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of the budget hereby adopted to the State Auditor's Office and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 4. Attached hereto is the Use of Tax Funds Report, and by this reference said Report is incorporated herein as if set forth in full and the same is hereby adopted in full. The Finance Director is authorized to update actual expenditures in the final report as projected prior to printing the final document. Section 5. This ordinance is a legislative act delegated by statute to the City Council of the City of Edmonds, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect January 1, 2022. IA99:1611VA01 MAYOR, MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 111 8.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 16th day of November, 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2022. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of November, 2021 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 112 8.1.a Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING STREET EXPENDITURES 2U2U % of Project usingREET 2021 % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 Dayton St. Utility Replacement 62,315 2% 238th Island and ADA Curb Rams 1,510 100% 2020 Overlay Program 305,369 38% 2020 Pedestrian Safety 24 100% 2021 Overlay Program 18,750 36% $407,663 49% 2021 Pedestrian Safety 96,255 99% Interfund Transfer for 1 % Arts - Various Projects 717 100% Sidewalk Expansion & Maintenance Program Supplies 100,000 100% REET 1 - Fund 126 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program 466 100% 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades 4,833) 100% 2020 Guardrail Installations 25,222 100% 16,876 100% 2020 Overlay Program 230,208 28% 2020 Traffic Calming 7,244 39% 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades 5,392 100% 2021 Overlay Program 14,127 27% 304,277 37% 220th Adaptive 9,986 100% 238th St. Walkway (SR104 to Hwy 99) 29,594 100% 84th Overlay from 220th to 212th 32,163 9% 26,355 57% Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing 629 72% Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement 100,606 40% 335,943 23% Dayton St. Utility Replacement 46,977 1 % Trackside Warning System 2,615 98% 2021 Traffic Calming 42,780 100% 2021 Guardrail installations 22,000 100% 76th Ave W Overlay 29,864 13% Elm Way 95,428 100% Hwy 99 Revitalization / Gateway 290,000 22% m 7 m N N O C- O L IL N N O N O z 4- 0 c O O Q V c m C �L O 2 v O a m C cv C :a L O d tm 3 m L 0 N N O N r C d E t V O Q Packet Pg. 113 8.1.a Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING PARKS EXPENDITURES 2020 % of Project usingREET 2021 % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 Waterfront Development & Restoration 25 100% Civic Development 8,187 2% Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Phase 2 17,753 100% Waterfront Development & Restoration 1,395,352 27% $16,000 6% Marina Beach Park 33,241 100% Audible Pedestrian Signals 430 54% Gateway Sign Replacements 22,420 100% Parks Maintenance 69,165 8% City Park Walkway 30,000 100% Civic Park 408,816 10% Flower Program Greenhouse 50,000 100% Parks Maintenance Professional Services 50,000 100% Parks Maintenance R & M 105,000 100% Parks Maintenance Supplies 21,000 10010 REET 1 - Fund 126 Debt Service 163,687 100% 400,310 100% Civic Park 413,427 90% 108,389 3% Waterfront Redevelopment 971,993 19% 123,500 50% Land Acquisition Consulting Services 45,000 d 7 m N N O a O IL` N N O N d s O C O O. O Q C m C �L V 7 a as C m c �a L O d tm 7 m L 0 N N O N r C d E t V O Q Packet Pg. 114 8.1.a Part 2: Use of RE ET Funds for the succeeding two-year period and Percentage of REET Funds for capital projects Comoared to all other sources of capital oroiect fundina as Identified in Citds Capital Facilities Plan. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2023 arotal % of Funding Citywide Bicyle Improvement Project 1,562,390 1,562,390 Local Grants (Secured) 1,323,471 1,323,471 85% Fund 125 Reimbursement - Citywide Bicyle Improvement Project 238,919 238,919 15% Citywide Bicyle Improvement Project $ - $ $ - 100% Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave S to 9th Ave S (901,780) (901,780) Stormwater Utility Fund 349,900 349,900 39% Fund 126 Reimbursement- Elm Wayfrom 8th Ave S. to 9th Ave S. 551,880 551,880 61% Elm Way from 8th Ave S. to 9th Ave S. $ $ $ 901,780 1 100% PARKS PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2022 2023 Total % of Funding Civic Center Playfield (10,121,292) (10,121,292) Grants 2,228,000 2,228,000 22% Private Donations unsecured 642,000 642,000 6% Fund 125 Reimbursement -Civic Center Development 1 2,898,6721 1 2,898,672 1 29% Park Impact Fees 1 4,352,6201 1 4,352,620 1 43% Civic Center Playfield 1 $ $ 1 $ - 1 100% d 7 m N N O om O L IL N N O N 0 z O a O Q. 0 Q c 0 c �L V 7 (L a) U c c �a L O d 3 m L 0 N N O N r C d E t V O Q Packet Pg. 115 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/16/2021 Proposed 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Staff Lead: Rob English, Phil Williams, Angie Feser & Shannon Burley Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History On October 26, 2021, Staff presented this item to the City Council. On November 1, 2021, a Public Hearing was held for this item. Staff Recommendation Preliminary approval of the project lists in the Public Works and Parks 2022-2027 CFP/CIP documents and authorize the City Attorney to draft an ordinance for final approval for the December 14, 2021 City Council meeting. Narrative The 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented in a different format this year. In previous years, the CFP and CIP were separate documents and projects in the CIP were organized by the City's financial funds. This year, staff combined the CFP and CIP into one document with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets for all projects and programs. The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2022-2027 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1. The Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department proposed 2022-2027 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2. The October 26, 2021 presentations from Public Works & Utilities (Attachment 3) and the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department (Attachment 4) are attached. Staff made a CFP/CIP presentation to the Planning Board on October 13, 2021 (See Attachment 5 for the 10/13/21 Planning Board Minutes). The Planning Board held a public hearing at the October 27, 2021 meeting and received comments along with two written comments prior to the public hearing (Attachment 6, 10/27/21 Planning Board Minutes and Attachment 7 are the written comments). The Planning Board approved the following motion and recommendations at the 10/27/21 meeting: Motion to recommend the 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to City Council, with the following recommendations: 1. That staff do their best to explain the funding aspect of the CFP to the public and explain why items are located where they are, particularly the Marsh Restoration Project and other projects that incorporate multiple components of the CFP. Packet Pg. 116 8.2 That the City should establish a formal process to establish values and a vision of Edmonds that would be as part of, and lead, the Comprehensive Planning process. Seek opportunities to shift monies or look for funding to move forward with projects that advance equity throughout the City. The CFP/CIP Public Works and Parks documents require a 60-day review period by the Department of Commerce. The 60-day review period ends on December 10, 2021. The item is scheduled for final approval by ordinance on the consent agenda for the December 14th City Council meeting. BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Public Works & Utilities Proposed 2022-2027 CFP-CIP Attachment 2 - Parks Proposed 2022-2027 CFP-CIP Attachment 3 - October 26, 2021 Public Works & Utilities Presentation Attachment 4 - October 26, 2021 Parks CFP-CIP Presentation Attachment 5 - PB 10-13-21 Draft Minutes Attachment 6 - PB 10-27-21 Draft Minutes Attachment 7 - PB written comments Packet Pg. 117 N N I O N O N O O_ OA d Packet Pg. 118 8.2.a Index TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP ..................................................... 2 FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP....................................................................... 3 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LIST........................................................................4-6 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT SHEETS............................................................. ..7-64 WATER PROJECT LIST..........................................................................................65-66 WATER PROJECT SHEETS....................................................................................67-69 STORMWATER PROJECT LIST............................................................................70-71 STORMWATER PROJECT SHEETS......................................................................72-81 SEWER PROJECT LIST...........................................................................................82-83 SEWER PROJECT SHEETS.....................................................................................84-88 FACILITIES PROJECT LIST...................................................................................89-90 FACILITIES PROJECT SHEETS...........................................................................91-108 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT LIST.................................109-110 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT SHEETS...........................111-114 CIP-CFP COMPARISON(2021-2027).................................................................115-118 a+ Q Packet Pg. 119 1 -11. 1 C" Public Works & Utilities Department TRANSPORTATION & PW D-04� UTILITY PROJECTS �� WT-28 Projects o Sewer o Stormwater • Street/Intersection Project o Non -Motorized Transportation Project IN o Water Sewer Street/Intersection Project ` PWT-05 • Non -Motorized Transportation Project k 'mil RM" m PWT-17 • PWT-24 • PWT-03 • PWT-09 I PWT-12 F7= PWT-35 PWT-ZPWT-16 PWT-19 • PWT-11 PWT-1/ -13 IPWT-14 PWT-31 PWT-50 PWS-11 PAM m MMWr��<fflw PWT-10 * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 10 PWT °V ED�4Q�� Public Works & Utilities Department FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECTS � S. PWF-01 . 9 �t Sprague � /WF-07 tea-. � M ✓ ca Q, 6Pp � � +� Edmonds_5 �T r PWF-16� d '✓abjes� °` PWF- ' Z��16%1M1 L; • Mai tP.W,F.-09 > PWF-10sell st �� L MAIN-ST co Z wick a ■ F-1.1 a _ PW 0 yDayton St c Dayton St ** ' N � Dayton St Ills PWF-13 <� I= a�� Maple St M Q O o Alder St �� ♦•r u> p � � Alder St a L LU ■ ■ wa 1 . Walnut St Walnut St ,�, PWF-07 PWI PWF-04 PWF-09 • PWI PWF-03 PWF-10 00 PWF-13 P Projects q �o Facilities I o WWTP � Y � 041 PWF-1 44 '• =9 ,I E �a UC PWF-08 1 -_ llLA N_ III '041�r/IlY RM Ell * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. Packet P 121 J• 8.2.a TRANSPORTATION Q Packet Pg. 122 Transportation Projects 8.2•a # CFP PROJECT DP 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL # (2022-2027) (2028-42) Project Cost Preservation / Maintenance Proiects PWT-01 lAnnual Street Preservation Program 76 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $9,186,000 $0 $9,186,00C PWT-02 84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW 84 $5,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,780 $0 $5,78C PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. 78 $1,663,723 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,663,723 $0 $1,663,722 PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. $0 $157,000 $780,000 $0 $0 $0 $937,000 $0 $937,00C PWT-05 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $450,000 $0 $530,000 $0 $530,OOC PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $700,000 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,OOC PWT-07 Main St. 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $350,000 $450,000 $0 $450,OOC Safetv / Canacity Analvsis PWT-08 X 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $14,700,000 $0 $14,700,OOC PWT-09 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 80 $7,660,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,660,000 $0 $7,660,00C PWT-10 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3 81 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $0 $32,522,000 $0 $32,522,OOC PWT-11 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4 82 $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $41,001,000 $0 $41,001,00C PWT-12 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $7,044,000 $37,971,000 $45,015,00( PWT-13 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,217,000 $20,217,00C PWT-14 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,142,000 $38,142,00C PWT-15 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,242,000 $35,242,00C PWT-16 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,072,000 $20,072,00C PWT-17 X SR 524 196th St. SW / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 $1,174,000 $0 $1,174,00C PWT-18 X Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $176,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,176,000 $0 $1,176,OOC PWT-19 X 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements 83 $276,902 $387,4391 $725,000 $6,881,000 $0 $0 $8,270,341 $0 $8,270,341 PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System 86 $150,000 $260,000 $0 $1,955,000 $0 $0 $2,365,000 $0 $2,365,OOC PWT-21 X SR-104 tooth Ave W. Intersection & Access M mt m rovements $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $931,000 $0 $1,091,000 $0 $1,091,00C PWT-22 X SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $450,000 $0 $530,000 $0 $530,OOC PWT-23 X SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements 1 $0 $0 $0 $213,000 $1,219,000 $0 $1,432,000 $0 $1,432,OOC PWT-24 X Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266,000 $1,266,OOC PWT-25 X 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,622,000 $16,622,OOC PWT-26 X SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $481,000 $2,750,000 $0 $3,231,000 $0 $3,231,OOC PWT-27 X Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $671,000 $671,OOC PWT-28 175th St Sope Repair $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,OOC PWT-57 2022 Guardrail Program 95 $20,180 $0 sol $0 $0 $0 $20, N $0 $20,18C PWT-58 2022 Traffic Signal Upgrades 88 $30,280 $0 sol $0 $0 $0 $30,28011 $0 $30,28C Non -motorized transportation Proiects ti N O N N N O N O to O 0M O L_ a a_ U a tL C) ti N O N N N O N N to O O a` to d r to Y O PWT-29 X 1232nd St. SW Walkway from tooth Ave. to SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 $1,183,000 $1,389,000 $0 $1,389,00C IL PWT-30 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $1,267,000 $1,494,000 $0 $1,494,OOC PWT-31 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,831,000 $1,831,00C PWT-32 X 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $640,000 $790,000 $0 $790,OOC y PWT-33 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $2,894,000 $0 $2,894,00C t PWT-34 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. $0 $0 $0 $597,000 $2,339,000 $0 $2,936,000 $0 $2,936,OOC t1 PWT-35 I X 1218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000 $1,350,000 $1,590,000 $0 $1,590,00C r PWT-36 X Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S $0 $0 $0 $265,000 $0 $0 $265,000 $0 $265,00C Q PWT-37 X 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $200,00C PWT-38 Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements Project 85 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,OOC 4) PWT-39 X Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project 79 $1,562,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,562,390 $0 $1,562,39C t PWT-40 X Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $2,702,000 $0 $2,702,00C U PWT-41 X 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $668,000 $0 $788,000 $0 PWT-42 X Railroad St. Walkway from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $754,000 $0 $924,000 $0 $924,00C Q PWT-43 X SR-104 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,294,000 $1,294,000 PWT-44 X Downtown Lighting Improvements $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,200,000 $0 $1,500,000 PWT-45 X SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine/Pine from SR-104 to 9th $0 $0 $0 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $3,290,000 Packet Pg. 123 Transportation Projects 8.2•a # CFP PROJECT DP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028.42) TOTAL Project Cost PWT-46 X 191st St. SW Walkway from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $678,000 $678,OOC ti PWT-47 X 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane Walkway from 238th St. SW to 106th $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,OOC O PWT-48 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $324,000 $324,OOC N PWT-49 X 84th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $328,000 $328,OOC N PWT-50 X 238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,285,000 $1,285,OOC N PWT-55 X Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S 93 $901,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $901,780 $0 $901,78C PWT-56 X 2022 Pedestrian Safety Program 87 $20,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,185 $0 $20,18E W Ferry Projects p PWT-51 X I Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St. 1 $0 $0 $0 $357,000 $0 $0 $357,000 $0 $357,OOC a Traffic Calming fl PWT-52 ITraffic Calming Program 11 94 1 $33,1301 $18,0001 $18,0001 $18,0001 $18,0001 $18,00011 $123,130 $0 $123,13C U d Traffic Planning Projects LL PWT-53 I Citywide ADA Transition Plan I $0 $100,000 $0 $01 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,OOC U PWT-54 I ITransportation Plan Update 77 1 $185,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $185,000 $0 $185,00C C NN Total Projects $15,059,350 $8,622,439 $7,953,000 $34,731,000 $46,537,000 $47,988,000 $160,890,789 $177,003,000 $337,893,7K N Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028.42) TOTAL (2022-2027) Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal revenue $185,000 $131,000 $156,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $922,000 $0 $922,000 REET Fund 125 $835,199 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $835,199 $0 $835,199 REET Fund 126 $1,382,400 $1,596,0001 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $9,050,4001 $0 $9,050,40C Transportation Impact Fees $60,000 $75,6091 $343,750 $145,000 $500,000 $0 $1,124,359 $0 $1,124,35£ General Fund $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,OOC Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $371,272 $25,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $401,272 $0 $401,272 Federal Grants $936,428 $1,811,830 $1,343,250 $0 $0 $0 $4,091,508 $0 $4,091,50E State Grants $8,700,000 $3,700,000 $2,607,0001 $0 $0 $0 $15,007,000 $0 $15,007,OOC Other $2,073,211 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,073,211 $0 $2,073,211 Unsecured Funding $0 $1,268,000 $1,975,0001 $32,918,0001 $44,369,0001 $46,320,000 $126,850,0001 $177,003,0001 $303,853,OOC O N N to O Q O L tL to d r 06 to Y L O Total Revenue $15,059,350 $8,622,439 $7,953,000 $34,731,000 $46,537,000 $47,988,000 $160,890,789 $177,003,000 $337,893,7Ky 3 d C N E t U r Q r C N E t v to Q Packet Pg. 124 6 Project Description Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets. Project Benefit Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000/ year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $225,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,275,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,236,000 $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,236,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 7 Packet Pg. 125 212TH 8T S4'? r 2161n &L 514 < 2101m.!k 3; IL T maw 220TH.ST Project Description Pavement overlay of 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW, with curb ramps upgrades, RRFB's at the existing crosswalk in front of the Chase Lake Elementary School, and bike lane addition from 215th St. SW to 212th St. SW on both sides of the street. This project is funded through a secured Federal grant and local funds. The project will be completed in fall 2021 and the funding in 2022 is necessary to close-out the project and complete the grant documents. Project Benefit Improve pavement condition and active transportation safety along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $1,130,000 Design Right of Way Construction $5,780 Expense Total $5,780 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $780 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $5,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $5,780 Packet Pg. 126 I wWld PI SW Q;- w Qe6 Sk 5i4 155th S1 SW '7 Q C r-4DL }�fjllh S'r b1+f '3 Q. W 1&11h PI 8W 7 288TWST SW'X' Penny Ln 189LIk P7 7 'r'1 iC'M IA4tl�f•� �'Ry L d 14QU� Si �k1' F4+de S1 54h �- 191MI St SW � li_a T 5w Malt. 'fop' # 192+kd Pl &W PL 1920 M P3jr4 3iq* 1?JFd W • > 193r sW N #51 Nw S 4JI cm u t d Project Description Pavement overlay of 76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades, RRFB's at the proposed crosswalk at 75th PI. W, and possible addition of a bike lane for the northbound movement. This is a joint project funded by the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood, since the west half of the street is in the City of Edmonds and the east half is in the City of Lynnwood. Project Benefit Improve pavement condition, install new Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) for pedestrian safety and upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to meet ADA standards. In addition to the existing southbound bike lane, the project may add a new northbound bike lane as outlined in the City's Transportation Comprehensive Plan. Estimated Project Cost 1,955,000 Design Right of Way 2 Construction $1,663,723 a Expense Total $1,663,723 ' Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal c REET Fund 125 m E REET Fund 126 $274,195 R Transportation Impact Fees Q General Fund = Stormwater Utility Fund 422 d E Federal Grants $639,788 s V m r State Grants Q Other $749,740 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,663,723 Packet Pg. 127 G Edmonds Polito and Orvic Pinyfleid Municipal Court Veteran's. Z LL3 Playa y Bell sr r_i st .� { F_ IN A Sno•Isla Frances Artdvrron Par Par ,s ■ 0 Library Anderson enter 7 0 IL C@nter Field L J Uavton S . Christian,CrL � Science Church Project Description Pavement overlay along Main St. from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at the existing pedestrian crosswalk at 8th Ave. The project will be funded with a federal grant (funds available in 2023) and City funds for a local match. Project Benefit Improve pavement conditions on this segment of Main St., pedestrian safety with the addition of RRFB's, and pedestrian accessibility with the ADA curb ramp. Estimated Project Cost $937,000 Design $157,000 Right of Way Construction $780,000 Expense Total $157,000 $780,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $31,000 $156,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $126,000 $624,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $157,000 $780,000 Packet Pg. 128 10 a C• PU ET DR Project Descriptio The project consists of a complete signal rebuilt, with the removal of all vehicle head currently on spam wire and conversion to standard traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project. Project Benefit his upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the vehicle heads aren't fixed while handing on those wires. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected. Estimated Project Cost $530,000 Design $80,000 Right of Way Construction $450,000 Expense Total $80,000 $450,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $80,000 $450,000 Funding Source Total $80,000 $450,000 Packet Pg. 129 11 1' S Vr 2381h St SW Faith f� F Cornrnunity < Church Project Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. Project Benefit _V The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Estimated Project Cost $850,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 23sth Si $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 23 7th F' Packet Pg. 130 12 Orackom La nd i ng"t 5avth 0 -f it F dr *4. Railroad `'Sf Si�CiC►t r �ti. � � ' w Edmonds Palici "t and Municipal At / ' Court li:ni Park co Aiv Uateran'! ' r '&V Edmonds Cenlignnial Plaa� 4k- City Hall Playa Oell S ` ■ '} _E rit in MAIN T Project Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. Project Benefit 79 The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Estimated Project Cost $450,000 Design $100,000 Right of Way Construction $350,000 Expense Total $100,000 $350,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $100,000 $350,000 Funding Source Total $100,000 $350,000 Packet Pg. 131 13 •,-R Kam,* :;. r i3t r IF 1 • * ;0; f ir} V p ! ! '�,?„4 fL` . � V AN is M # GM is_J T*! n -T W� 1 y ! F # t rLlY St SVf *LiIF L me Y ■• j�.i a�i 4F x ,■■! ! #10 fi .�#, .s wig + 41JF * i E PHAN E him P1s #, 4 -ems t; wOp r A ibth Nh SW * ';� � i • Y � -+ � � t `f � ! � i � * ire r�F� ■ rho :.'r. �* ' ■ SIV h., ■ #iiF� ■ ■# f �ti IL -31 �� k il y Q 4L T� 49 L11 � 7�N Rm �m� � ■ �4TY ■„ t tw '. ri�� i -� ,t111y�i . { # 4rwNll _+#' ; Sr i *t. 3T 2-20th SA � �� ii■k�f ■t A 0'7� f�.. �� 11 [4V, �#j J■T � �-9 ail 4JtL r �# •� , 3FE1lSraSy} 4' * t �� JR*.' #' ifl�-%L r�� 7 JtE; ia4 ; �yi. Uzi w'L r! R f Zip # Ir 'a t III I Y` _ ■e Jr, �.■,�'� ilw �.8 �� t 41 ;71W91.151" '. — Jl.l;fil. ! * J. 07 3,L- TY��rf+ i •ram +iTl■wY i r,�. S ! .. } `_ _ : •, - Project Description Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Project Benefit This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evaluate the possibility of creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). Estimated Project Cost $14,700,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $700,000 $1,000,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 14 Packet Pg. 132 6OWZ)0 f J rL 03 04 In 17j, 244TH ST S 212THS1_,T_ n w a > 3 Pik } ? Jto 4 0 W Ifs >236TH-ST SW 244TI J ET SLV Project Description Installation of raised landscaped median along Highway 99 corridor from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, addition of"Gateway" signage on both ends of the corridor, and a new pedestrian HAWK signal just north of 234th St. SW The project is funded from state funds provided by the Connecting Washington Transportation program. Project Benefit The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St. Estimated Project Cost 9,033,000 Design Right of Way Construction $7,660,000 Expense Total $7,660,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants $7,660,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $7,660,000 A 15 Packet Pg. 133 244TH 0 SW ! *:Ir_X_ z `_.. J' fe sw 24151 S= Sir ; „ W UkK�,BJ4Ll,lhIGER WAY�`�t+VAY� L,4�{E �k,�,.d1N0EF � Project Description The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The project will construct wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, improved stormwater facilities, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments. The Design and right of way phases are funded through secured Connecting Washington funds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor. Estimated Project Cost $32,522,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $640,000 $2,000,000 $712,000 $1,200,000 $1,218,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 _ d $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,875,000 E s $55,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 r r $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 Q Packet Pg. 134 16 .4 F i; T se w 222hd Si 5W a Jq ro togf isP, y r Project Description fit P1a sw int41 - ti t u,nc eu _w J ' U.JI— z 0 or To -=" The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 220th St SW to 224th St. SW. The project will construct wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, improved stormwater facilities, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments. The intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. will be widened to add capacity and improve the level of service. The Design and right of way phases are funded through secured Connecting Washington funds, a federal grant and local transportation impact fees. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved Estimated Project Cost $41,001,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $688,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,479,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $1,232,000 $348,000 $400,000 $500,000 $732,000 $268,000 $1,920,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 Packet Pg. 135 17 1oSob 5t L. Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $45,015,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,580,000 $2,013,000 $1,000,OC $500,000 $2,951,000 $1,000,OC $35,971,OC $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 _ d E t $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $371971,OC r r $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 Q is Packet Pg. 136 SPERANCE -- — — t- 23MI, 51 SW M&I�Wa Wi Ar '..ZTI•{ ST ';-a Project Description 234m sr svi Saab, � sur � F G jp _ Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $20,217,000 Design $2,146,OC y Right of Way $11433,0C o Construction $16,638,OC Expense Total U $20,217,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re a REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 m Transportation Impact Fees General Fund U Stormwater Utility Fund 422 r Q Federal Grants aD State Grants E t Unsecured Funding $20,217,OC r r Funding Source Total $20,217,00 Q Packet Pg. 137 19 ESPERANCE 5-.A _ 1;�*iaf* 228 TH ST SW i 5 i ;sit IF .� Pon a iPh # 4 Ztn 51 9W r — 4 -� r M # A % J dP i l k . �JO it f, x i■ �,..,� Mor- ■rt '3nbn sr sw :�Tureiswt r-M�.h#. r �■� ��` F i l e i � �s 14.4 HrIfV to ��04rt 6+'; 7 * � � 'A * £� I aItY*�K L ! k isIPP ■ra1Aw�l■yM' 234ih h 8W — Project Description W"A 4 W < O � 4 Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $38,142,000 n Design $4,013,OC y Right of Way $5,354,OC L 0 Construction $28,775,OC 3: Expense Total tU $38,142,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re a REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 m Transportation Impact Fees General Fund U Stormwater Utility Fund 422 r Q Federal Grants aD E State Grants t Unsecured Funding $38,142,OC r r Funding Source Total $38,142,00 Q Packet Pg. 138 20 ilia 7. i � M} IL *� F. 1W 00 ■ a * 9 2751h as 5:W G' N* am Z a % 44 mmaat e_� 225ah Sw k 5 IN -L INN LU HIM A JP 7► sw.. 'k' n A k u� $ 228TH 3T SW Project Description L I [l NTLA E w w t" t 0 It i Jr i- 226TH iL sw Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $35,242,000 Design $3,596,00 0 Right of Way $2,439,OC L 0 Construction $29,207,OC Expense Total $35,242,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re a REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 = m Transportation Impact Fees t General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Q Federal Grants = d State Grants E t Unsecured Funding $35,242,OC r r Funding Source Total $35,242,00 Q Packet Pg. 139 21 A Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $20,072,000 Design $1,866,00 0 Right of Way $2,036,OC L 0 Construction $16,170,OC Expense Total $20,072,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re a REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 = m Transportation Impact Fees t General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Q Federal Grants = d State Grants E t Unsecured Funding $20,072,OC r r Funding Source Total $20,072,00 Q Packet Pg. 140 22 seventh Day d �i Adventist Church sa 1 6tn St SW 7 96TH ST SW PU D -Q Sub LLJ Station co N . Maplewood Hill Park oa Project Descriptio Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW. Estimated Project Cost $1,174, 000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $238,000 3 a $216,000 $720,000 = $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 E t v R Q c $80,000 d E s m r Q $158,000 $216,000 $7 Packet Pg. 141 23 Funding Source Total $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 geil st � . � GJ < CrL MAIN ST .4nd�rson U7 Center ti.l Field } Yost Park �; .�.��:.;�� -• Imo., A Project Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. Estimated Project Cost $1,176,000 Design $176,000 Right of Way Construction $1,000,000 Expense Total $176,000 $1,000,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $500,000 General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $176,000 $500,000 Funding Source Total $176,000 $1,000,000 Packet Pg. 142 24 INCO 219th St S;W go d _ A r` 21919 cis 2 0TH ST SW is if M LUIL 7514 IWO M 221Sx PI SW 499 ESPEi�ANCE STARBUCKS Project Description Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utility improvements (invluding potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders. Estimated Project Cost $8,270,341 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Water Utility Fund 421 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $276,902 $287,439 $50,000 $100,000 $675,000 $6,881,000 $276,902 $387,439 $725,000 $6,881,000 $60,000 $75,609 $343,750 $21,062 $25,000 $5,000 $15,840 $15,000 $5,000 $180,000 $271,830 $371,250 $6,881,000 $276,902 $387,439 $725,000 $6,881,000 25 Packet Pg. 143 AIYMr 147 '.' m4h' ga :l1bu,. ut A¢ss Dr Q* fi . - — 71 ►ram k �..• } _•',,arm„ •Jilihr l �7+1 vi L.� Project Description Installation of an Adaptive System along SR-104 from 236th St. SW to 226th St. SW (total of five traffic signals along this stretch / spaced — % mile from each other). No signal communication currently exists between any of the existing traffic signals. Project Benefit Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 25,000 vehicles per day. Estimated Project Cost $2,365,000 Design $150,000 $260,000 Right of Way Construction $1,955,000 Expense Total $150,000 $260,000 $1,955,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $45,000 REET Fund 126 $78,000 $264,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $105,000 $182,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,691,000 Funding Source Total $150,000 $260,000 $1,955,000 Packet Pg. 144 26 QFC PCC NATURAL MARKET 0 76 gas WALGREEN'S PARIIINO BABE{ EDMO DS WAY eQ o Q Q 0 co *r w a Gy ev o BANK � a°� a°iw 4co M o, a�a � aak � � ry ew m IVAR' a4M G N BARTELL'S — Project Description Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,091,000 Design $160,000 y Right of Way Y 0 Construction $931,000 3: Expense Total $160,000 $931,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re 3 a REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 r = m Transportation Impact Fees t General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Q Federal Grants = d State Grants E s Unsecured Funding $160,000 $931,000 r Funding Source Total r $160,000 $931,000 Q Packet Pg. 145 27 a 2281h Sr SVV PVD Sub Station 7L - I ]� dis t LN a 28TH ST SW < Vh�estgate �Cliapgl Project Description Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Estimated Project Cost $530,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $80,000 $450,000 $80,000 $450,000 uw w Zz LU IL uU LA w $80,000 $450,000 a=i $80,000 $450,000 to r r Q Packet Pg. 146 28 38TH ST %: x ICareen Presbyter Church, Project Description Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. Estimated Projec ost $1,432,000 Design $213,000 Right of Way Construction $1,219,000 Expense Total $213,000 $1,219,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $213,000 $1,219,000 Funding Source Total $213,000 $1,219,000 Packet Pg. 147 29 Seaview Park '0st Office LU ia5lh PI SW l� j a Jr 7841h PI SW awi r 01) OLYMP(ic v,6VV R Lynndals Park C A Project Description Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). Project Benefit The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. Estimated Project Cost $1,266,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REST Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $213,OC = a $1,053,OC $1,266,00 r _ m E t Q d $11266,0C t $1,266,00 r r Q Packet Pg. 148 30 LU a to 'Up P't 2121 W - w c+ W z CN 05 220TFI ST Soh LU C _ 9C LLJ } ` u = 4 287}i T StiN WD LU 228TH :S t' - i lip O ut c c c ,Q c 236TI4 STx z t s s Project Descriptio Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike lanes and street lighting. Estimated Project Cost $16,622,000 Design $2,122,OC D Right of Way N Construction Y $14,500,OC o Expense Total $16,622,00 � Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 3 a REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees r 0 General Fund t Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants Q State Grants = d Unsecured Funding $161622,00 s Funding Source Total $16,622,00 r r Q Packet Pg. 149 31 Seattle 243rit PI S Z Baptist �r !!-: � Church Lake °' aLLJ r' Ballinger EDMONDS WAY LASE BALLINGE R 4A A Project Description Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection. Estimated Project Cost $3,231,000 Design $481,000 Right of Way Construction $2,750,000 Expense Total $481,000 $2,750,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $65,000 General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $416,000 $2,750,000 Funding Source Total $481,000 $2,750,000 Packet Pg. 150 32 /17 OkVDA LE B 17,W1 St S)~') 7 K rd St SW 173rd p1 SVV 1740 St SW 5t. Thomas Moore school Project Description Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) Project Benefit Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. Estimated Project Cost $671,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total A $109, OC $562,OC $671,00 d $671,OC t $671,00 Q 33 Packet Pg. 151 Project Descriptio — a The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW. Project Benefit r Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment. Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction $1,000,000 Expense Total $1,000,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,000,000 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 Packet Pg. 152 34 SPER.ANCE Eti 0 \)VNN4 x 'A, e Project Description Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,389,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 35 Packet Pg. 153 F .._v--,F Flementary II'd F.T. Project Descriptio Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,494,000 Design $227,000 Right of Way Construction $1,267,000 Expense Total $227,000 $1,267,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $227,000 $1,267,000 Funding Source Total $227,000 $1,267,000 N. A 36 Packet Pg. 154 3, to < ,. L � > Z Project Description Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1, 831,000 Design $264,OC Right of Way Construction $1,567,OC Y Expense Total $1,831,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $1,831,OC a=i Funding Source Total $1,831,00 m r r Q Packet Pg. 155 37 16 0 w _ �+ �i#}bass *- ! ■ #� O B1.141 y F �- vIVIVF[ Yril", $ A N 238 rimn ESPERANCE AP Christ " � = Lutheran 'YANM " CMIST LUTHERA R O a Churc#,QFTIFT Perk and Ride 23AU1 4 Ch 23. 3 PEYMY 0 73EDS L KJING C. 2MV M•M * i IM V 2Sd15 ¢ H AURORA MARKETPLACE T U raWur h4ni.n�i lit V �� '7.1V' - 5EUQL Project Description A Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit 1W This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $790,000 Design $150,000 Right of Way Construction $640,000 Expense Total $150,000 $640,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $150,000 $640,000 Funding Source Total $150,000 $640,000 Packet Pg. 156 (YNNWOO[ ,, EDMONDS - " Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). Estimated Project Cost $2,894,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 d $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 s $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 r Q 39 Packet Pg. 157 x < ' � 1 a %0 cj c LYNNWOOD v 85 ` c 9 c mot:. c Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $2,936,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $597,000 $2,339,000 $597,000 $2,339,000 $597,000 $2,339,000 a=i $597,000 $2,339,000 m r r Q Packet Pg. 158 40 Chase Lake Elementary Chase Lake School } Edmonds Church of'CGod .' i 6tlt St SVV Edmonds Woodway High School wadisi Edmond i LIJ C a JI M4 4w- > i N i 0TH ST SW : Project Description Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,590,000 Design $240,000 = w Right of Way 06 Construction $1,350,000 Y Expense Total $240,000 $1,350,000 0 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $240,000 $1,350,000 a=i Funding Source Total $240,000 $1,350,000 m r r Q Packet Pg. 159 41 THE MAMNER BECK'S LU COMMODORE t dw lu V MA alp i C Holly or J ' c - y Cedar c Project Description Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. Estimated Project Cost $265,000 Design $40,000 ai Right of Way = r Construction $225,000 06 Expense Total $265,000 Y L Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re o REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 Transportation Impact Fees a General Fund r Stormwater Utility Fund 422 E Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $265,000; Q Funding Source Total $265,000 _ s m r r Q Packet Pg. 160 42 4NT N no z- � �T ' t rS I� Swedish F_dmil ndc 216?11 st SW EDMONDS MEDICAL PAIILlOIV 21605 KRUGE:R CLINIC =N'S E P, MCDONALD'S VALUE Q VILLAGE 2161t1 st SW Project Descriptio Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of 216th St. SW). This project ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit To provide a safe and desirable walking route. Estimated Project Cost $200,000 Design $20,000 Right of Way Construction $180,000 Expense Total $200,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $200,000 Funding Source Total $200,000 43 Packet Pg. 161 Project Description Complete pedestrian crossing enhancements with the installation of RRFB's at (7) intersections (Walnut St. @ 8th Ave. S, SR-524 @ Brookmere, 106th Ave. W @ 229th PI. SW, Main St. @ Olympic Ave., 76th Ave W @ 206th St. SW, Dayton @ 2nd Ave. S, and Dayton St. @ Private Drive ), a new traffic signal at SR-104 @ 232nd St. SW, and a HAWK signal at SR-524 @ 84th Ave. W. Design, right of way and construction phases are funded through a federal grant, TIB state grant and local funds. Project Benefit Improve pedestrian safety by increasing driver yielding compliance for pedestrians waiting to cross at a marked crosswalk and safer crossing along SR-104 and SR-524 with higher speeds and longer crossing distances through signal and HAWK signal. Estimated Project Cost $2,145,000 Design Right of Way a Construction $10,000 Expense Total $10,000 = Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re m E REET Fund 125 $820 t V REET Fund 126 $2,230 Q Transportation Impact Fees General Fund d E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $310 s m Federal Grants $6,640 Q Other Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $10,000 Packet Pg. 162 Project Description w C --- I" MON.— Installation of bike lanes or sharrows along various street segments as identified on the Proposed Bike Facilities map of 2015 Transportation Plan. Bike lanes or sharrows will be added along 100th St. SW / 9th Ave. from 244th St. SW to Walnut St, Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave. to 84th Av., 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. to 78th Ave., and 80th Ave. from 228th St. SW to 220th St. SW. Project Benefit This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). Sound Transit awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more convenient access so that more people can use Sound Transit services. Estimated Project Cost 2,100,000 Design Right of Way Construction $1,562,390 Expense Total $1,562,390 Other $1,323,471 $0 $0 $0 $0 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $238,919 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,562,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 45 $0 Packet Pg. 163 CASPIRs T Z w w LU M cr, 4 J MAIN ST Project Description Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (— 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. Estimated Project Cost $2,702,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 Packet Pg. 164 46 220TH ST SVJ ZZ a o f rr r • 0. tA �s + L 3r 1. ■+ -. _ gF 01 #� �.� W # ; mein V oi; Ln ■■ y H 4 ¢ k M Project Description Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost Design $120,000 Right of Way Construction $668,000 Expense Total $120,000 $668,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $120,000 $668,000 Funding Source Total $120,000 $668,000 Packet Pg. 165 47 Puget Sound Fishing Fli@r Oiyrn p i c Beach Park R4astroo m '01A k Washington Stag Ferry Bracketts Terminal Landing South `^ 4� Railroad Station "r , 1 " 4.q141 Post Office 11q<.'(� Air 1 's -- Mini Park - i�� LU (17 V� City of Edmonds Trooltment Plant Project Description Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad Ave from Dayton St. to SR-104. Eta Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along Railroad Ave from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination points (such as Waterfront Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds, WSDOT Ferry Terminal...). Estimated Project Cost $924,000 Design $170,000 Right of Way Construction $754,000 Expense Total $170,000 $754,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $170,000 $754,000 Funding Source Total $170,000 $754,000 Packet Pg. 166 Seattle .. flap#ist Church W Lake Ballinger OAI b WA Y � FDMONDS WAIF LACE BALUN GER WAY Project Descripti ila Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps. Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across SR-104. Estimated Project Cost $1, 294,000 Design $238,OC Y Right of Way Construction $1,056,OC Y Expense Total $1,294,00 o Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $1,294,OC a=i Funding Source Total $1,294,00 m r r Q Packet Pg. 167 or_ Project Description Installation of street lights along various streets within Downtown Edmonds. Project Benefit This project will add new street lighting in Downtown to improve pedestrian safety at night. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 Design $300,000 Right of Way Construction $1,200,000 Expense Total $300,000 $1,200,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $300,000 $1,200,000 Funding Source Total $300,000 $1,200,000 Packet Pg. 168 50 Edmonds Marsh � cra z 0 W w } .. CL 4F z m Fe ❑WOn _.- _ F ?: LU V) .JJ Project Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 to 9th Ave S Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park. Estimated Project Cost $3,290,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 d $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 s $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 r Q 51 Packet Pg. 169 Sierra Park un m ❑o 0 O� u, Project DescriptiAom Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $678,000 Design $100,00 Right of Way Construction $578,00 Y Expense Total $678,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $678,OG a=i Funding Source Total $678,00 m r r Q Packet Pg. 170 52 - Salem i Edmonds Lutheran i Fielghts Church C K-12 a I i � Scriber . �k40: < High SchooE" � u i J6- M r HickmanMr V , c Park it M440 Edmonds FaRb "' Mm4rial Community - =' Com etery Church Project Description Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,060,000 Design $160,00 Right of Way Construction $900,00 Y Expense Total $1,060,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $1,060,00 a=i Funding Source Total $1,060,00 m r r Q Packet Pg. 171 53 46, " 1� •wow- 2i9trt St Sw . No 0TH ST SW Edmonds Church of God Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $324,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $59,OC $265,OC $324,00 r m E t Q $324,OC a=i $324,00 m r r Q 54 Packet Pg. 172 4Ln Seavi vw Elern@ntai I-B61h St SW r f 1871h St sw Op Project Description Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $328,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $50,OC $278,OC $328,00 r m E t Q $328,OC a=i $328,00 m r r Q 55 Packet Pg. 173 { < L OC L (Q 77 1-fir Q• 7 41 . L � . LLf Ar a o N CU CO 7401!h S[ SW Nlathay Ballinger Park r Project Description Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,285,000 Design $187,OC Y Right of Way Construction $1,098,OC Y Expense Total $1,285,00 o Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $1,285,OC a=i Funding Source Total $1,285,00 m r r Q Packet Pg. 174 56 Pugel Sound Edmonds Marsh w LU c � s Project Description JV Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. Project Benefit Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. Estimated Project Cost $357,000 Design ai Right of Way = r Construction $357,000 06 Expense Total $357,000 Y L Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re o REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 3 Transportation Impact Fees a General Fund r Stormwater Utility Fund 422 E Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $357,000; Q Funding Source Total $357,000 s m r r Q Packet Pg. 175 57 Project Description Af Install traffic calming devices (such as Radar Feedback signs, speed cushions, or other elements). Project Benefit Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy. Estimated Project Cost $33,130 for 2022 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Packet Pg. 176 Project Description The Plan identifies all existing ADA deficiencies within the City Right of Way (such as non -compliant ADA curb ramps, tripping hazards within sidewalk, non -compliant ADA driveways, and signalized intersection without Audible Pedestrian Signals (APS). Project Benefit Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way. Estimated Project Cost $100,000 Design $100,000 Right of Way N Y Construction o Expense Total $100,000 3: 2 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $100,000 3 REET Fund 125 a REET Fund 126 r Transportation Impact Fees 0 General Fund t Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants Q State Grants = d Unsecured Funding s V Funding Source Total $100,000 r Q Packet Pg. 177 59 Project Description Update the City's long range transportation plan. Project Benefit Estimated Project Cost $185,000 Design $185,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $185,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $185,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $185,000 Packet Pg. 178 Ln Sea Vista p5. 7#h and w Elm Paris Q 2 DTI ST SW . o Project Description The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will install approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Way between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. Project Benefit The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction $901,780 Expense Total $901,780 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $551,880 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $349,900 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $901,780 A 61 Packet Pg. 179 Project Description Jw Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) and/or flashing LED lights around regulatory signs at selected locations throughout the City. Project Benefit Improve safety at pedestrian crossings. Estimated Project Cos $20,000/year Design = r Right of Way 06 Construction $20,185 0 Expense Total $20,185 0 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 3 REET Fund 126 $20,185 a Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding d Funding Source Total $20,185 m r r Q Packet Pg. 180 62 Project Description J Install guardrails along selected stretches throughout the City with steep drop-off and other safety issues. Project Benefit Improve safety of City transportation system. Estimated Project Cost $20,000/year Design Right of Way Construction $20,180 Expense Total $20,180 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $20,180 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $20,180 63 Packet Pg. 181 W a w i 22 3 { Project Description Upgrade traffic signal equipment at selected signalized intersections with new equipment within signal cabinet, new vehicular detection, new vehicle heads, and/or new pedestrian heads. Project Benefit Improve reliability of traffic signal operation. Estimated Project Cost $30,000/year Design Right of Way Construction $30,280 Expense Total $30,280 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $30,280 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees r General Fund a=i E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding a=i Funding Source Total $30,280 m r r Q Packet Pg. 182 64 8.2.a WATER Q Packet Pg. 183 65 8.2.a Water Proiects # CFP PROJECT OP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWW-01 Phase 12 Annual Replacement Program 2022 50 $2,159,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,159,412 $2,159,412 PWW-02 Phase 13 Annual Replacement Program 2023 46 $486,661 $3,389,788 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,876,449 $3,876,449 PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program 2024 $0 $506,128 $3,525,379 $0 $0 $0 $4,031,507 $4,031,507 PWW-04 I I Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program 2025 $0 $0 $526,373 $3,666,379 $0 $0 $4,192,7521 $4,192,752 PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program 2026 $0 $0 $0 $547,428 $3,813,034 $0 $4,360,462 $4,360,462 PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program 2027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $569,325 $3,965,555 $4,534,880 $4,534,880 PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $592,098 $592,098 $592,098 PWW-08 2022 Waterline Overlays 49 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 PWW-09 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment 47 $505,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $505,000 $505,000 Total Projects $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $0 $24,427,560 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Y027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2022-2027) (2028-42) Water Fund - 421 $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $24,427,560 Total Revenue $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $0 $24,427,560 Packet Pg. 184 66 1 Project Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. Project Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $2.9 to $4.5 million/year Design $486,661 $506,128 $526,373 $547,428 $569,325 $592,098 N Right of Way Y 0 Construction $2,159,412 $3,389,788 $3,525,379 $3,666,379 $3,813,034 $3,965,555 3: Expense Total $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 v $4,557,653 Water Fund 421 $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 a Funding Source Total $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 _ d E s v a w E a Packet Pg. 185 67 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Waterline Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $175,000 Design $30,000 Right of Way Construction $145,000 Expense Total $175,000 Water Fund 421 $175,000 Funding Source Total $175,000 Packet Pg. 186 185th P[ SW a J:r; S 18151h PI SW view Water TAnk A LIa' k OW Project Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the project will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. This work is being done to provide an in detail evaluation of the condition of our two underground potable water storage reservoirs. Findings will be used to determine costs and next steps for any future needed maintenance or repairs. Project Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost TBD Design Right of Way Construction $505,000 Expense Total $505,000 Water Fund 421 $505,000 Funding Source Total $505,000 LLJ I- 00 A Packet Pg. 187 8.2.a STORMWATER Q Packet Pg. 188 70 8.2.a Stormwater Projects # CFP PROJECT DP 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Y027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL # (2022-2027) (2028-42) Project Cos Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Related Projects PWD-01 X lEdmo.ds Marsh Water Quality Improvements 55 1 $190,000 $1,230,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,420,840 $0 $1,420,8, PWD-02 X I Edmonds Marsh/Willow Creek Daylighting - Design & Construction 1$0 $600,0001 $600,0001 $8,000,0001 $8,000,0001 $0 $17,200,00011 $0 $17,200,0( Perrinville Creek Basin Projects PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 60 $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $621,542 $0 $621,5, PWD-04 X Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration (Phase 1) 53 $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $3,500,0( PWD-05 X Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 59 $555,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $555,000 $0 $555,0( Storm Drainage Improvement Projects PWD-06 Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design Phase $300,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $550,0( PWD-07 X Ballinger Regional Facility Construction Phase �61 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,0( PWD-08 Green Street & Rain Gardens $400,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,0( Annually Funded Proiects PWD-09 12022 SD Overlays 57 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,0( PWD-10 Phase 3 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2022) 58 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,450,000 $0 $1,450,0( PWD-11 Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2023) 52 $312,000 $1,622,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,934,400 $0 $1,934,4( PWD-12 Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2024) $0 $324,480 $1,687,296 $0 $0 $0 $2,011,776 $0 $2,011,7, PWD-13 Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2025) $0 $0 $337,460 $1,754,786 $0 $0 $2,092,246 $0 $2,092,2, PWD-14 Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2026) $0 $0 $0 $350,9581 $1,824,9771 0 $2,175,935 $0 $2,175,9< PWD-15 Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2027) $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,9961 $1,897,976 $2,262,972 $0 $2,262,9 PWD-16 Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2028) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,596 $379,596 $0 $379,55 Compliance Related Projects p—w—p--i —7F I Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan 1 56 1 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,0( Total Projects $4,238,542 $4,877,720 $11,524,756 $10,205,744 $10,289,973 $2,377,572 $43,514,307 $0 $43,514,3( Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $ 2,457,292 $ 2,363,880 $ 3,774,756 $ 4,205,744 $ 4,289,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 19,469,217 $ $ 19,469,21 Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ State Grants $ 671,250 $ 723,840 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 1,395,090 $ $ 1,395,09 Unsecured Grants $ 1,110,000 $ 1,790,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ $ 22,650,000 $ $ 22,650,00 Total Revenue $ 4,238,542 $ 4,877,720 $ 11,524,756 $ 10,205,744 $ 10,289,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 43,514,307 $ $ 43,514,30 ti N O N N N O N d to O 0. O a` a_ U IL LL ci ti N O N N N O N N N O 0. O a to d 7 06 N Y O t� 7 IL 71 Packet Pg. 189 Edmonds Marsh RJniup Qf, O Edmonds Marsh Project Descriptio Feasibility documents for the Willow Creek Daylighting project identified some areas of concern for water quality of stormwater entering the Marsh. Additionally, new research has identified a chemical in tire production causing pre -spawn mortality in salmon, further cementing the linkage between vehicle traffic and poor water quality for fish habitat. By improving the water quality inputs of stormwater, the future marsh can provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. This project was previously included in the 2021 budget as only a "Phase 1" project specific to the west side of SR-104. However, with additional funding identified, staff propose to expand this effort to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges directly into the marsh form SR-104 and Harbor Square. Project Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 Design $190,000 $10,000 Right of Way Construction $1,220,840 Expense Total $190,000 $1,230,840 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $104,500 Federal Grants State Grants $30,000 $536,340 Unsecured Grants $160,000 $590,000 Funding Source Total $190,000 $1,230,840 Packet Pg. 190 72 %VI I; -.I L.L. I;, ofAI I •I II--:. I . Project Description 1iaish as it cximud in I D 41 L;lximed pLoj2acmkepr The project will daylight Willow Creek and help begin restoration of historic conditions in the Marsh. The project has three sub -components including (1) daylighting Willow Creek through the existing Unocal property, (2) daylighting of the Willow Creek through Marina Beach Park (top of bank to top of bank), and (3) excavation/reestablishment of tidal channels within the existing Marsh. The project includes significant re - vegetation and mitigation within the Marsh to improve habitat conditions. The current cost estimate for the project includes all flood walls and berms associated with daylighting the creek but does not include Marina Beach park improvements beyond the top of bank. The project is a component of the PROS plan (comprehensive plan) for open space, habitat and fulfills goals #1, #3 and #4. Total project cost is estimated around $17.2 million and future funding sources are yet to be identified; however, grant funding of roughly 75% of the project cost is tentatively planned. Project Benefit The daylighting of Willow Creek and subsequent redevelopment of Marina Beach park (not included) will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early 1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including juvenile Chinook. The project will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. This project is a priority in the Edmonds PROS plan. Estimated Project Cost $17, 200, 000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants Unsecured Grants $600,000 $600,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $600,000 $600,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $150,000 $150,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $450,000 $450,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $600,000 $600,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Packet Pg. 191 73 Funding Source Total Project Descriptio Reducing scouring flows in order to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These effort have become even more critical given recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff flexibility to respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions projects. Project Benefit The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events. Estimated Project Cost $100,000/year Design $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 a Right of Way Construction $111,542 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 = Expense Total $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 E Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 R Federal Grants Q State Grants c Unsecured Grants d E Funding Source Total $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 r r Q Packet Pg. 192 74 Project Description The City has struggled to manage the undersized outfall system at Perrinville Creek; the current combination of creek alignment, sedimentation, and undersized culverts creates several issues which make the creek unsustainable as a natural system. The concern must be addressed from the bottom of the creek up in order to sequence the relief of the numerous concerns correctly. A future phase would replace the culvert under Talbot Road as well. The improvements are needed to relieve current flooding, ease City maintenance needs, and provide better and more sustainable fish habitat. This project will build on any interim improvements which staff are able to complete in 2021. The project would include a new culvert under BNSF right-of-way which is fully compliant with current flood management and fish passage regulations. The project will include many stakeholders and likely include a minimum 2-year design and development phase before being ready for construction. Project Benefit The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage. Estimated Project Cost $5,500,000 Design $550,000 $100,000 r Right of Way $50,000 E Construction $2,800,000 t Expense Total $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 Q Stormwater Utility Fund 422; Federal Grants c E State Grants s Unsecured Grants $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 Funding Source Total $550,000 $150,000 Q $2,800,000 Packet Pg. 193 75 Pout EL Office S&a- -),v Park cn 7851h S# SVv r 3: JO lu Ik 1 R6th S1 5W ir Ti cc V- 0 Project Descriptio 20 Reducing scouring flows in order to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The project is an incremental step toward recovering this stream run as an adequate fish habitat. The grant for this project has already been secured. This project proposes construction of an infiltration system in Seaview Park, almost identical to the successful Phase 1 project which was completed in 2019, in order to infiltrate more runoff in the Perrinville Creek basin. Project Benefit Decrease peak storm flows in the Perrinville Creek basin to help normalize flows within Perrinville Creek and decrease potential of scour within the Creek. Estimated Project Cost $742,000 Design $60,000 Right of Way a Construction $495,000 Expense Total $555,000 = Stormwater Utility Fund 422 m $138,750 E Federal Grants t State Grants $416,250 Q Unsecured Grants c Funding Source Total $555,000 E s m r r Q Packet Pg. 194 76 Mathay Ballinger Park W 240Ih PI SW 241st ST FVV a L f� - __ ., co 242 nd $I S Project Descriptiois Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger pollution generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. This phase is limited to design and production of plans and specifications; construction phase will be tracked as separate project (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting). Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. Estimated Project Cost $550,000 a ProjectCost 1 Y Design $300,000 $250,000 t Right of Way Construction Q Expense Total $300,000 $250,000 4) Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $75,000 $62,500 s Federal Grants State Grants $225,000 $187,500 r Q Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $300,000 $250,000 Packet Pg. 195 77 Mathay Ballinger Park nil yy }y.., [y` 240th Pa ','- - f 1b C Y l'- EL 242n 1 -n sv i Project Description Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger pollution generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. This phase is limited to the construction phase and will be tracked as separate project (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting) Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design Right of Way = Construction $6,000,000 m E Expense Total $6,000,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $1,500,000 Q Federal Grants State Grants E Unsecured Grants $4,500,000 Funding Source Total m $6,000,000 Q Packet Pg. 196 Project Descriptio City forays into green stormwater infrastructure elements have been limited, but with good success. Continuing to implement such projects will allow us to proactively make improvements to the conditions of the City drainage system and will help reduce flooding. This project proposes to implement green stormwater elements, such as rain garden and bioretention, throughout the City. Staff will leverage opportunities with other projects, communication with property owners, and historical knowledge/experience to identify and selected locations where green infrastructure can be implemented with relative ease or efficiency. Staff proposes to implement this effort as a series of small work projects over the next several years. Project Benefit Improvements to the City drainage systems using raingardens and green infrastructure resulting in reduced flooding and a reduction to peak stormwater flows. Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 Design $75,000 $100,000 Right of Way Construction $325,000 $500,000 Expense Total $400,000 $600,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants $400,000 $600,000 Funding Source Total $400,000 $600,000 Packet Pg. 197 79 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Annual Storm Maintenance Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Storm Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $60,000 Design $9,000 Right of Way Construction $51,000 Expense Total $60,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $60,000 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $60,000 Packet Pg. 198 Project Description Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via first had knowledge or video inspection results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its lifespan and requires routine replacement or repair in order to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of a storm drain system failure. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs Estimated Project Cost $1.8 to $2.3 million/year Design $312,000 $324,480 $337,460 $350,958 $364,996 $379,596 0 Right of Way 3: Construction $1,450,000 $1,622,400 $1,687,296 $1,754,786 $1,824,977 $1,897,976 Expense Total $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 a Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 Funding Source Total $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 = m E t Q c d E s m r r Q Packet Pg. 199 8.2.a SEWER Q Packet Pg. 200 8.2.a Sewer Proiects # CFP PROJECT DP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWS-01 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements, (2022) 65 $1,606,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,606,550 $1,606,550 PWS-02 Phase 10 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2023) 62 $336,074 $1,889,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,225,286 $2,225,286 PWS-03 Phase 11 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2024) $0 $349,517 $1,964,780 $0 $0 $0 $2,314,297 $2,314,297 PWS-04 Phase 12 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2025) $0 $0 $363,498 $2,043,372 $0 $0 $2,406,8701 $2,406,870 PWS-05 Phase 13 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2026) $0 $0 $0 $378,038 $2,125,107 $0 $2,503,145 $2,503,145 PWS-06 Phase 14 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2027) $0 $0 $0 $0 $393,160 $2,210,111 $2,603,271 $2,603,271 PWS-07 Phase 15 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2028) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $408,886 $408,886 $408,886 PWS-08 1 12021 SS Overlays 64 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 PWS-09 I I Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4 63 $482,258 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $482,258 $482,258 PWS-10 I IAnnual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation $0 $501,549 $521,6111 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $2,716,550 $2,716,550 PWS-11 1 1 Lake Ballinger Sewer $0 $1,000,0001 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Total Projects $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $0 $23,327,113 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2022-2027) (2028-42) Sewer Fund -423 $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $23,327,113 Total Revenue $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $0 $23,327,113 Packet Pg. 201 83 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $2.0 to $2.6 million/year Design $336,074 $349,517 $363,498 $378,038 $393,160 $408,886 y Right of Way Y 0 Construction $1,606,550 $1,889,212 $1,964,780 $2,043,372 $2,125,107 $2,210,111 3: Expense Total $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 Water Fund 423 $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 a Funding Source Total $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 r m E t Q _ d E s m r r Q Packet Pg. 202 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $60,000 Design $12,000 Right of Way Construction $48,000 Expense Total $60,000 Water Fund 423 $60,000 Funding Source Total $60,000 Packet Pg. 203 F A M Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $482,258 Design $72,338 Right of Way Construction $409,920 Expense Total $482,258 Water Fund 423 $482,258 Funding Source Total $482,258 Packet Pg. 204 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $500,000 to $590,000/year Design $75,232 $78,241 $81,371 $84,626 $88,011 N Right of Way Y 0 Construction $426,317 $443,370 $461,104 $479,548 $498,730 3: Expense Total $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 Water Fund 423 $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 a Funding Source Total $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 r m E t Q _ d E s m r r Q Packet Pg. 205 tSVLKANU- F � � r na 238TH ST SW 244TH ST SVO 45 A rn r� Lake Ballifi�� 235TH PL SW 236TH ST. sv < 4YAY LAKF 'BA LLrNGER WAY -.:�244:TH;5TaS{W Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lake Ballinger will require additional flow capacity in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for population growth, reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk system. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintenance and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potential sewer spills into Lake Ballinger. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Water Fund 423 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Packet Pg. 206 8.2.a FACILITIES Packet Pg. 207 8.2.a Facilities Proiects # CFP PROJECT OP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $186,549 $0 $186,549 PWF-02 Cemetery Building $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $17,112 $0 $17,112 PWF-03 City Hall $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $1,103,350 $0 $1,103,350 PWF-04 I I Fishing Pier 1 $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,9181 $5,628 $1,043 $32,870 $0 $32,870 PWF-05 I Frances Anderson Center $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $805,751 $0 $805,751 PWF-06 IFS 16 $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $205,377 $0 $205,377 PWF-07 I FS 17 $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 $641,678 $0 $641,678 PWF-08 I FS 20 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $241,029 $0 $241,029 PWF-09 IHistoric Log Cabin $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $97,167 $0 $97,167 PWF-10 I Historical Museum $12,121 $13,0891 $15,000 $10,000 $4,6211 $10,199 $65,029 $0 $65,029 PWF-11 Library $45,000 $105,1751 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $434,441 $0 $434,441 PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $59,464 $0 $59,464 PWF-13 Old Public Works $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $262,205 $0 $262,205 PWF-14 Parks Maint. Building $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $270,495 $0 $270,495 PWF-15 Public Safety $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $1,558,144 $0 $1,558,144 PWF-16 Public Works O&M $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $628,697 $0 $628,697 PWF-17 WadeJames Theater $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $320,860 $0 $320,860 PWF-18 Yost Pool House $25,0001 $65,5701 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $174,623 $0 $174,623 Total Projects $1,188,429 $1,205,800 $1,924,741 $900,120 $711,762 $1,173,988 $7,104,840 $0 $7,104,840 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $388,076 $111,454 $126,656 $117,964 $106,361 $122,520 $973,031 $0 $973,031 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $800,353 $1,094,345 $1,798,085 $48,325 $0 $0 $3,741,108 $0 $3,741,108 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $0 $0 $0 $30,453 $0 $0 $30,453 $0 $30,453 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $703,3791 $605,401 $1,051,4671 $2,360,2471 $0 $2,360,247 Total Revenue $1,188,429 $1,205,799 $1,924,741 $900,121 $711,762 $1,173,987 $7,104,839 $0 $7,104,839 LI Packet Pg. 208 Project Description This building built in 1900 was the original field house for Edmonds High School. The property located at Civic Field and is not part of the large Civic Field Park restoration project. The building is solely operated by the Snohomish County Boys and Girls Club in partnership with the City's Parks and Recreation department. The building has significant need for major renovations if it is expected to be in operation for another 10 years. Renovation and deferred maintenance may eclipse the building value in its current location. Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, Roof replacement, Siding replacement, ADA Access, Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire Alarm System new installation, Fire Sprinkler updates, Baseboard heating replacement Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost a $186,549 r m E t Construction\Professional Services $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 2 Expense Total $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 Q Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $6,000 $6,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $30,151 $32,034 $20,733 s Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $30,453 r Unsecured Funding $25,077 r $8,101 Q Funding Source Total $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 Packet Pg. 209 91 Project Descriptio M This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be needed as technology dictates. Projects: Minor repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 r _ $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 E $455 $1,954 $2,094 $2,000 $2,000 $818 Q $6,414 $1,377 d E $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 m r r Q 92 Packet Pg. 210 lla Project Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the building in the 1990s. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. The building is in near original condition and is in need of substantial repair and maintenance. Projects: Solar utilization and cool roof engineering scope, HVAC upgrades and equipment replacements, Electrical Service replacement, Plumbing and drain pipe replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Main Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements, Whole building generator installation Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1,103,350 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $15,000 $15,000 $18,000 $156,463 $264,064 $305,246 $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 r m E t $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 Q $18,000 $20,000 $20,000 E s m r r $132,000 $50,949 $88,628 Q $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 93 Packet Pg. 211 ... Project Description The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located near the east end of the pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this facility. Projects:, Electrical panel and pier electrical feed replacement, Minor repairs and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $32,870 Construction\Professional Services $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043— Expense Total $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 r Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $5,000 $2,971 $2,918 $2,500 $1,043 E Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $5,320 $4,991 0 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Q Unsecured Funding $3,128 Funding Source Total $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 c $1,043 d E s m r r Q Packet Pg. 212 Project Description The Frances Anderson Center is housed in the 1928 Edmonds elementary school building. This building serves as the Parks, Recreation, Cultural and Human Services offices and is on the City's Historic Register. The Building is nearly 55,000 square feet and is home to several permanent tenants including, Main Street Kids daycare, Edmonds Montessori, Sno-King Youth Organization and the Olympic Ballet practice space and offices. The building serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoration. Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating, Replacement of all exterior doors (24 ea), New, ADA accessible door closures, New Windows (historically appropriate), Interior painting Classrooms , Plumbing drainage collector, Gym Floor, Drinking fountains ADA compliant, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures, Replacement of several common area and classroom flooring, Addition of building security card readers , Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Alarm replacement, Fire Sprinkler replacement, Elevator refresh and code updates Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $805,751 Construction\Professional Services $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 Expense Total $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $20,000 $20,000 $25,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $25,000 $15,000 $30,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $123,925 $110,593 $273,378 95 Packet Pg. 213 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Project Description 8.2.a $73,892 $5,934 $83,029 $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area of 10,700 square feet. The building is in fair condition and will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain operationally ready for the needs of the City. Projects: Roll -up bay door replacements, HVAC unit replacements, Gutter and drainage repair or replacements, Building Controls updates , Interior painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $205,377 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $24,970 $47,689 $24,970 $47,689 $5,000 $5,000 $19,970 $42,689 $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $1,591 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $61,388 $22,107 $23,631 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 Packet Pg. 214 m� 1 Project Description This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800 square feet. This building has had some updates but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready. Projects: Bay Door replacements, Drainage updates, Electrical infrastructure updates, HVAC Chiller plant replacement, Interior Painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 r Expense Total $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 E Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $5,000 $8,000 $8,000 $5,000 $5,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $34,935 $76,545 $217,547 Q Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds); Unsecured Funding $136,830 $22,575 $117,245 Funding Source Total $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 m r r Q Packet Pg. 215 97 Project Description This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station serves Esperance and supports the other two fire stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. The building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates. Projects: New engine bay doors, Fire alarm system replacement, New property perimeter fencing, Storm water drainage system, Interior painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $241,029 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $13,460 $16,500 $12,774 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 Y $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Q c E $89,248 $64,782 $18,765 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 r Q Packet Pg. 216 Project Description This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually. Projects: Front entry steps and railing, New thick cut shat roof Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $97,167 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $7,903 $7,903 $4,000 $3,903 $80,000 $80,000 $1,000 $79,000 $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469— $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 r $500 $546 $1,361 $500 £ $388 Q $5,969 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 s m r r Q Packet Pg. 217 Project Description The 110 year old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural stabilization and weatherproofing are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility. Projects: Minor structural reinforcement , Entry facade masonry repair, Lower entry restoration, Heating boiler replacement Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $65,029 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 r $10,199 $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $12,121 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,000 $2,500 $10,589 $12,500 Q c $7,500 $2,621 E $7,699 $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 r Q 100 Packet Pg. 218 Project Description The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the Second floor Plaza room rental space. The library is a 19,000 square foot building built in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade and plaza deck waterproofing. Projects: Window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, Gender inclusive public restroom creation, Plaza room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza room A/V installation, Building masonry restoration or building cladding, Exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan replacement, Building breezeway remodel, Building flooring replacement, Garage level drainage and stucco repairs, Exterior planter box replacement and waterproofing, Staff restroom remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $399,441 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $5,000 $5,000 $7,500 $5,000 $5,000 $40,000 $100,175 $143,402 $48,325 $40,038 $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 101 $35,000 $35,000 $5,000 $30,000 $ Packet Pg. 219 Funding Source Total Project Description This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses the City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs. Projects: Minor maintenance and repairs, Furnace replacement, Increased mechanical ventilation Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 r Expense Total $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 E Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $2,500 $1,159 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $21,083 $9,926 $2,865 Q Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds); Unsecured Funding $4,485 $1,946 d E Funding Source Total $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 m r r Q Packet Pg. 220 102 7 Project Description This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the building was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primarily used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness. Projects: HVAC updates, Role -up door replacement, Parking lot resurfacing Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $262,205 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $2,500 $5,000 $2,000 $53,135 $102,743 $22,308 $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 r $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Q c E $23,000 $23,000 $22,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 r Q 103 Packet Pg. 221 Project Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilities maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility. Projects: Maintenance and Repair to maintain operational capacity Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost = $270,495 a m Construction\Professional Services $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 t Expense Total $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 U $69,228 2 r Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $2,500 $5,000 $1,500 $1,500 $5,000 Q Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $125,631 $13,289 $35,320 Q Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) t Unsecured Funding $7,849 $3,677 U $64,228 2 Funding Source Total $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 Q Packet Pg. 222 104 owl Project Description The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The building houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing and storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and should be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers. Projects: Boiler replacement, Air Handler and Outdoor ventilation unit replacements, Chiller plant replacement study/scope, Auxiliary heating coil replacement, New solar plant installation, Parking lot reconfiguration to meet current usage, Fire Sprinkler Installation, Interior hallway renovation and painting, Sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommodations, Gender inclusive public restrooms, Operable windows is specific locations, Roof replacement, Courts flat roof, Sally Port garage/processing remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1, 558,144 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $285,000 $15,000 $20,000 $55,180 $35,967 $425,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $40,169 $136,481 $495,071 $55,169 $151,481 $5 Packet Pg. 223 Funding Source Total $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 105 Project Description This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center This building is 28,000 square feed and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates. Projects: Vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, Ventilation fan replacements, Fire Alarm system replacement, Lobby remodel, Restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, Electric Vehicle Charging and maintenance infrastructure, Emergency Communications updates, Wireless network expansion, Interior hallway flooring, Utility Bay HVAC replacement, Water main replacement (building connection), Window replacement Offices and Conference rooms, Achieve storage room remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $628,697 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Y 1 1 • 2027 2028-42 E $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 2 $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 Q $5,000 $8,500 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $75,000 $118,070 $208,643 s m r $75,315 $74,348 r $38,821 Q $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 106 Packet Pg. 224 Project Descriptio This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 quare feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing and grounds. Projects: Parking lot repair and recoating, Gutter/down spout replacement, Minor repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $320,86u Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $2,000 $2,000 $5,000 $19,697 $16,600 $94,077 $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 r $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 £ $5,000 $5,000 $2,000 Q $38,880 $110,734 $19,872 E $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 m r r Q 107 Packet Pg. 225 Project Description This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year round lap and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use. Projects: Security updates, Roof replacement, Gutter replacement, Plumbing fixture updates, Operational repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $174, 623 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 $2,500 $5,000 $2,500 $22,500 $60,570 $23,628 $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 m $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 t $8,409 $19,127 U $30,389 2 r $2,000 $2,500 $2,500 Q c Q E t U $6,409 $16,627 $27,889 2 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 Q Packet Pg. 226 8.2.a WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT :w f- ,-,-" 109 Packet Pg. 227 8.2.a WWTP Proiects # CFP PROJECT DP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-house Projects $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $14,000,000 $19,000,000 PWP-02 Carbon Recovery Project 67 $1,162,671 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,162,671 $0 $1,162,671 PWP-03 City Park Odor Scrubber 68 $297,121 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $297,121 $0 $297,121 PWP-04 I I Nutrient Removal Project 1 $0 $1,000,0001 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Projects $1,459,792 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $12,459,792 $14,000,000 $26,459,792 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2047 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Edmonds (Sewer Fund 423) (50.79%) $741,428 $1,015,800 $3,047,400 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $6,328,328 $7,110,600 $13,438,928 Mountlake Terrace (23.17%) $338,234 $463,400 $1,390,200 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $2,886,934 $3,243,800 $6.130,734 Olympic View Water Sewer District (16.55%) $241,596 $331,000 $993,000 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $2,062,096 $2,317,000 $4,379,096 Ronald Sewer District (9.49%) $138,5341 $189,8001 $569,4001 $94,9001 $94,9001 $94,9001 $1,182,4341 $1,328,6001 $2,511,034 Total Revenue $1,459,792 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $12,459,792 $14,000,000 $26,459,792 Packet Pg. 228 110 Project Description This ongoing project is to ensure that critical infrastructure is maintained and replaced as needed. Project expenditures may include, but are not limited to, variable frequency drives, pumps, motors, gear boxes, conveyors or any WWTP equipment that needs replacement versus repair. Project Benefit This project ensure that the critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced in order to reduce risk to the City. Estimated Project Cost $19,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District Ronald Sewer District Funding Source Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $2,800,OC $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $11,200,OC 5 0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $141000,00 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $7,110,6C a $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $3,243,8C r $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $2,317,OC a=i $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $1,328,6C t $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $14,000,00 Q 111 Packet Pg. 229 High Efficiency Blowers Project saves: $33,9091yr, and 345 tons CO2, equivalent to: 36.6 home's energy I 799 barrels of use For one year oil com med Dewaterin Project saves: $133,211iyr. and 537 tons C 0 r, equivalent to: 56.7 riome s e, ergy 1.243 barrels oFoil u�afor one year I c,pn3mmd Aeration & Blowers Projects ayes, $3d,00yr. and 294 tons M, equivalent to: 87.3 home's energy 611 barrels of use for oneyear I ail cDn5umed Project Description The Carbon Recovery Project replaces the aging Sanitary Sewage Sludge Incinerator with the Ecoremedy Gasification Process. The multi -year project which was approved by City Council on July 7, 2020 is being delivered through the State of Washington Energy Savings Performance Contracting program. Project Benefit Project benefits include a more sustainable approach to treating and disposing of biosolids by creating a marketable biochar. The project will reduce overall energy requirements while producing a PFAS free (or greatly reduced) end product. The project also includes a more robust odor scrubber and screenings management enhancements which are designed to reduce operation and maintenance cost for our ratepayers while improving odor in our surrounding community. The Carbon Recovery Project is the final project that was envisioned within the Pathway to Sustainability Estimated Project Cost $26,121,039 Design Right of Way Construction $1,162,671 Expense Total $1,162,671 Sewer Fund 423 $590,521 Mountlake Terrace $269,391 Olympic View Water Sewer District $192,422 Ronald Sewer District $110,337 Funding Source Total $1,162,671 112 Packet Pg. 230 Project Description This project will remove and treat the hydrogen sulfide gas that is being released into the atmosphere from a City owned sewer mainline and private roof vents in the area of Pine St and 2nd/3rd Ave S. The gas has a rotten egg smell which results in numerous complaints from residents in the area. An activated carbon odor scrubber was identified as the most efficient and effective method of capturing and destroying the nuisance odor. Project Benefit This project would formally address the ongoing problem and reduce odors in the area for residents and park patrons. Estimated Project Cost $297,121 Design Right of Way Construction $297,121 Expense Total $297,121 Sewer Fund 423 $150,908 Mountlake Terrace $68,843 Olympic View Water Sewer District $49,174 Ronald Sewer District $28,197 Funding Source Total $297,122 Packet Pg. 231 113 Project Description The State of Washington Department of Ecology will soon issue the General Permit for Nutrient Reduction. This General Permit will be issued to all WWTP's who discharge into the Puget Sound and currently caps the WWTP nutrient load. With the anticipation of the General Permit, the City has participated in a full scale pilot program that began in August 2020. The pilot program has shown promise to meet the requirements of the General Permit. This project is a place holder to fully develop a design and ultimately determine the cost of construction and ongoing O&M expenses. Project Benefit This project will ensure a reduction in nutrients discharged by the WWTP into the Puget Sound while increasing settleability and reducing effluent solids. Completion of the project will allow the City to meet the requirements within the General Permit, accompanying NPDES Permit and to increase flows in order to maximum the rated capacity of the WWTP. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design $1,000,000 Right of Way Construction $5,000,000 Expense Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Sewer Fund 423 $507,900 $2,539,500 Mountlake Terrace $231,700 $1,158,500 Olympic View Water Sewer District $165,500 $827,500 Ronald Sewer District $94,900 $474,500 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Packet Pg. 232 114 8.2.a CIP- CFP COMPARISON (2021-2022) Packet Pg. 233 115 UP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) 8.2.a ADDED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 2 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 3 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 4 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway -Stage 5 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 6 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 7 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 8 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 9 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Parks ADA Playground Upgrade Program Annual Program to upgrade / replace plagrounds Parks Yost Pool Repair Replacement of failing plaster at the pool Water Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028) Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. Water Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Reservoir assessment to determine upgrade needs and preliminary design Water 2022 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. Storm Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2028) Estimated future costs for storm pipe replacements. Storm Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1 Estimated future costs for 1st phase of Creek Restoration Storm 2022 SD Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to storm replacements Storm Green Street & Rain Gardens Estimated future costs for Citywide green infrastructure projects Sewer Phase 15 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements (2028) Estimated future costs for sewer line replacements/rehab/impr. Sewer 2022 SS Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewer line replacements. Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 4 Estimated future costs for sewer project. ti N O N N N O N O N O 0. O L. a d U d LL U N O N N N O N N N O O_ O d N d r 06 N Y L O V Q. a+ Q Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 234 116 8.2.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) REMOVED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME UP DESCRIPTION Transp Hwy 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed / Included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 4 Transp Hwy 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed/ included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 9 Transp Hwy 99 @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed / included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 5 Transp Hwy 99 Pedestrian Improvements (SR-104 Off -Ramps) X Removed / included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project Stage 2 & 3 Transp Hwy 99 @ 234th St. SW Traffic Signal X lRemoved Transp Sunset Ave. Sidewalk X Removed Transp Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. S X Completed Transp Dayton St. Walkway from 7th Ave.S to 8th Ave. S X Completed Parks Greenhouse Replacement 2021 Project Water 2021 Waterline Overlays Completed Water Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Water 5 Corners Reservoir RecoatinR Completed Water Phase 11 Annual Replacement Program (2021) Completed Storm Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Storm Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements -Dayton Pump Station Completed Storm 2021 SD Overlays Completed Storm Phase 1 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2020) Completed Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 2 Completed Sewer Phase 7 SS Replacement Project (2020) Completed Sewer Phase 8 SS Replacement Project (2021) Completed Sewer Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Sewer 2021 SS Overlays Completed Sewer LS#1 Metering and Flow Study Completed ti N O N N N O N O rn O 0. O ILL d U d LL U N 0 N N N O N N N O am O L d N d r 06 Y L O v d a+ Q Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 235 117 8.2.a CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) CHANGED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Transp SR-104 Adaptive System X Moved up from 2023 to 2022 Transp 175th Slope Repair Moved from Fund 126 to Fund 112 Transp Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave.S to 9th Ave. S X Construction funding added in 2022 Parks 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Postponed until 2025 Parks Waterfront Walkway Completion Moved to fund 125 Parks Civic Park X Utilizing $2M from REET and not General Fund Parks Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Increase in funding 2023-2027 ti N O N N N O N O N O 0. O aL d U d LL U N O N N N O N N N O O_ O L N d r 06 N Y L O V Q. a+ Q Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 236 118 EDMONDSPARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES 2022-2027 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8.2.b EDMONDSPARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES October 13, 2021 Members of the City Council, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds, It is an honor to present the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP serves as a long- range planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources, both secured and unsecured. The CIP is updated each year and presented in conjunction with the budget. Capital Improvement projects that are also included in the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) which are identified in the following document. In 2022 the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department will focus on the completion of the largest ever City of Edmonds Parks Capital project, the redevelopment of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfields. There are significant resources of staff time and funding invested in this project which began construction in August 2021 and is schedule to be complete Winter 2022. In addition to Civic Center the department will continue to focus on deferred maintenance of existing parks and recreation facilities, playground renovations and upgrades and required maintenance at Yost Pool. The updated Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS) will be completed in early 2022. This document, based largely on citizens priorities will guide future CIP plans. At this time, near future projects include the re -development of Marina Beach Park ($1M in grant funding secured), and annually funds are being set aside and accumulating for potential parkland and open space acquisition should the right opportunity become available. The department is focused on providing an equitable distribution of access to park and recreational facilities throughout the entire City. Your Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is proud to have served the citizens throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, working to ensure residents and visitors had safe and enjoyable places to recreate. With unprecedented usage of the city's parks system our priorities shifted to enhanced litter, garbage and restroom sanitization however we are looking forward to returning to our list of deferred maintenance and keeping the Edmonds Parks safe and enjoyable for all. Sincerely, ,Ril� Angie Feser Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director 425-771-0256 Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services • 600 Main Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 238 8.2.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM N d r CFP # PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Tot �a u_ PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS Civic Center Playfield Redevelopment of 8-acre park consistent with Master Plan adopted in 2017; X PRK 1 add restrooms, walking track, landscaping, inclusive playground, improve $ 9,755,742 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,755,7 field and lighting, skate park, petanque grove, tennis and multi sports courts. Marina Beach Park Improvements Redevelop the park consistent with the Master Plan adopted in 2015; X PRK 2 Parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, permanent restrooms, $ $ $ 1,750,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,750,000 $ $ 6,000,0 upgrade play area, improve ADA Accessibility, add bridges over new alignment of Willow Creek. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Prioritized in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and State certified Creative PRK 3 District. Improvements encourage pedestrian traffic and provide visual $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,000,0 connection between ECA and downtown contributing to economic vitality. Playground Upgrade Program Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide PRK 4 additional inclusive playgrounds/facilities providing access for children of all $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,050,0 ages and abilities. Yost Pool Repair Regular maintenance to re -plaster the pool to replace and repair failing PRK 5 plaster. Pool will be forced to close without repair. $ 175,000 $ $ - $ - $ $ $ 175,0 Waterfront Walkway Completion Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina PRK 6 Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums, $ $ $ 500,000 $ 750,000 $ $ $ 1,250,0 to provide ADA improvements. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X PRK 7 Restoration of the Marsh to reconnect the Puget Sound within the Edmonds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Marsh and two fresh water creeks to provide fresh water / salt water estuary and natural tidal exchange. N C Q E t U ca Q c m E t U to Q Page 2 Packet Pg. 239 8.2.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFP # PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Tot Community Park & Athletic Complex - Phase II X PRK 8 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ $ $ $ $ $ $ and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building X PRK 9 Replace and/or renovate deteriorating building in City Park. Project in $ $ $ $ $ $ $ conceptual phase. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 10,107,764 $ 177,023 $ 2,427,024 $ 3,427,025 $ 3,927,026 $ 6,177,027 $ 26,230,7 PARKS CIP PROGRAMS Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program PRK A This ongoing program allocates funds for the regular maintenance, repair and $ 155,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,405,0 replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Beautification Program This ongoing program allocates funds to support beautification. Specifically PRK B flower plantings, irrigation and mulch in areas such as corner parks, landscape $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 126,0 Park and Open Space Acquisition Program PRK C To acquire land for future parks and open spaces as opportunities become $ 1,099,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 3,094,0 available. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers PRK D Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to $ 193,832 $ 123,000 $ 148,000 $ 173,000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 $ 1,033,8 Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 1,468,832 $ 993,000 $ 1,018,000 $ 1,043,000 $ 1,068,000 $ 1,068,000 $ 6,658,8 (C) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B) $ 11,576,596 $ 1,170,023 $ 3,445,024 $ 4,470,025 $ 4,995,026 $ 7,245,027 $ 32,889,5 N d r U M uL U ti N O N N N O N O N O O_ O L a a c� d u_ U n N O N N N O N d N O M O L a L a N C d E t U ca Q r c d E t U R Q Page 3 Packet Pg. 240 8.2.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS CIP REVENUE 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Tot Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,900,0 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) 11 - Fund 125 $ 3,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 11,000,0 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 $ 874,575 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 3,124,5 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1,194,0 Operating Contribution - General Fund $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ Investment Interest (3%) $ 78,110 $ 39,793 $ 50,797 $ 31,381 $ 25,632 $ (539) $ 225,1 Donations $ 142,000 $ $ $ - $ - $ $ 142,0 Bond Proceeds $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ Secured Grants $ 2,728,000 $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ - $ $ 3,728,0 Unsecured Grants $ - $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,600,0 (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 8,421,685 $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,380,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 $ 29,913,7. Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100) $ 4,554,645 $ 1,399,734 $ 2,618,504 $ 1,573,276 $ 1,483,632 $ 463,238 (D) Revenue $ 8,421,685 $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,380,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 (C) Expenditures $ 11,576,596 $ 1,170,023 $ 3,445,024 $ 4,470,025 $ 4,995,026 $ 7,245,027 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,39%734 $ 2,61%504 $ 1,5731276 $ 11483,632 $ 463,238 $ 1,566,672 N C d E t V r� Q a d E t V O Q Packet Pg. 241 Page 4 of Epp Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services PARKS PROJECTS - - 0 E Projects loop 0 o Parks 11 � a Ca w U- N O N - N N p PRK�Q6 � �� c mm � 1 L- � mm_ PRK-05 a_ PRK'o, PRK-02 W . V PRKM09 = L) �� lr04 -111111 �'�CWW N rCD 1 F� 0 0 I N N E 1�! U ■ * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. Packet Pg. 242 Page 5 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 1: Civic Center Playfield 310 61h Ave. N — Downtown Edmonds Project Summary: An 8-acre downtown park development supported by $3.47M in grant funding, $5.3M in bonds, $1.3M in Park Impact Fees and $3.4M in Real Estate Excise Tax. This signature project broke ground in August 2021 and is slated for completion Winter 2022. Project Justification: This is a multi -year design, fund development and construction project that is a very high priority in the 2016 PROS plan. The Master Plan process was robust with extensive community input. Construction began August 9, 2021 and is underway and 2022 funding necessary to complete the project. Estimated Construction Cost: $13,758,000 2022 2023 0- Planning & Design Construction $9,755,742 $9,755,742 Total Expenses $9,755,742 $9,755,742 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $2,898,672 $2,898,672 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 $1,352,620 $1,352,620 Bond Proceeds $1,634,450 $1,634,450 Federal Grant (LWCF) $500,000 $500,000 RCO State Grants $850,000 $850,000 Snohomish County Grants $450,000 $450,000 Verdant Grant $170,000 $170,000 Hazel Miller Foundation Grant $1,500,000 $1,500,000 State Appropriation / DOC Grant $258,000 $258,000 Park Donations $142,000 $142,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $9,755,742 $9,755,742 Project Accounting #C536 & C551 Page 6 Packet Pg. 243 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 2: Marina Beach Park Improvements 470 Admiral Way, South of the Port of Edmonds Project Summary: Park renovation to better serve the community as it accommodates the new alignment of Willow Creek. The project will include parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, potential concession areas, permanent restrooms, upgraded play area, upgraded benches, picnic tables and BBQ's, improved ADA accessibility, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges connecting the park across Willow Creek, personal watercraft staging and launching area, bicycle racks, fencing, retaining the existing beach/ driftwood area and off leash dog area and environmental education opportunities. The Marina Beach Master Plan includes daylighting Willow Creek which requires removal of a 1,600' pipe that was placed in the early 1960's and is the only exchange between the Puget Sound and the freshwater Edmonds Marsh Estuary. $1,000,000 in RCO grants were awarded for this project in 2021. Project Justification: Marina Beach Park is a highly used regional park. Through the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Action Plan and the 2016 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan the community identified the need to restore the adjacent Edmonds Marsh, and re-established for salmon habitat. Improvements are intended to retain this site as an asset to the regional waterfront park system. This project is intended to address sea level rise and will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. Estimated Cost: $6,000,000 Planning & Design 2022 2023 2024 2025 $600,000 2026 $600,000 Construction $1,150,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 $5,400,000 Total Expenses $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 $6,000,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $750,000 $1,000,000 $1,750,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,150,000 $2,650,000 Secured Grants $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,150,000 $5,400,000 $600,000 $600,000 Project Accounting # C550 Page 7 Packet Pg. 244 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 3: 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor 41h Avenue from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, Downtown Project Summary: Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. Project Justification: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. Estimated Cost: $8,000,000 Planning & Design 2022 2023 2024 2025 $800,000 $800,000 Construction $200,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,200,000 Total Expenses $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 $1,000,000 1 $0 $1,000,000 1 $0 $6,000,000 1 $0 $8,000,000 Project Accounting #C538 Page 8 Packet Pg. 245 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 4: Playground Upgrade Program Project Summary: City of Edmonds owns, operates and maintains 15 playgrounds and only two of them are considered fully inclusive and accessible (Seaview and Civic Parks). One of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department initiatives is to continually update playgrounds which range in installation dates from 1985 - 2019. As part of these scheduled updates the department will work to enhance playgrounds to be inclusive versus merely meeting ADA standards. In many cases this includes enhanced play surfacing and play equipment that provide for children of all abilities. The playground improvement prioritization is slated to be established at the conclusion and adoption of the 2022 PROS plan to determine an implementation strategy. Project Justification: Playground upgrades are a necessary part of maintaining a safe play environment. With playgrounds that are 35+ years old many will be scheduled for upgrades. Further, it is the goal of the City to ensure that those upgrades include considerations for children of all physical and mental abilities and that these play amenities are designed to be a welcoming and healthy experience for all. Estimated Cost: $175,000 per year / $1,050,000 (6-year total) 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Planning & Design Construction $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Total Expenses $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $175,000 $175,000 $0 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 $0 Page 9 Packet Pg. 246 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 5: Yost Pool Repair 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many residents. In addition to teaching our youth water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. At this time, the pool needs a significant capital repair as the plaster lining the inside of the pool is continuing to deteriorate, falling off the walls and detaching from the bottom of the pool. The pool was re -plastered in 2001, 2011 and it is past due to re -plaster it again. Project Justification: Typically, the plaster on the pool bubbles when it reaches its end of life, eventually breaking open creating sharp edges which present a danger to the pool users and leads to future damage to existing plaster. If the plaster repair is not completed, the pool will not be operational at a point in the near future. Estimated Cost: $175,000 Planning & Design i Construction $175,000 $175,000 Total Expenses $175,000 $175,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 $175,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Secured Grants Total Revenue $175,000 Unsecured Funding $0 L $175,000 i Page 10 Packet Pg. 247 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 6: Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place) Project Summary: This would connect the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those pushing strollers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece would be constructed in front of the Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds. The easement and walkway design are currently under legal review. Project Justification: To provide public access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway would meet ADA requirements and would support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches. A top priority in the 2016 PROS plan is to open up beachfront access. Estimated Cost: $1,250,000 i Planning & Design $125,000 1 $125,000 Construction $375,000 1 $750,000 $1,125,000 Total Expenses $500,000 $750,000 $1,125,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $500,000 $750,000 $1,125,000 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $500,000 so $750,000 $0 $1,125,000 $0 Page 11 Packet Pg. 248 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 7: Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh and property owned by Unocal (Chevron Services Co.) Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh restoring the natural tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek within the park. That project is identified and detailed a separate capital improvement project (PRK 2). Project Justification: This project will fulfill the 2016 PROS plan goals and support Governor's Inslee's capital budget for salmon recovery, culvert removal, water quality and water supply projects to expand and improve salmon habitat. The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow Chinook salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. In addition, it will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has a stormwater component which will require removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. Estimated Cost: TBD Page 12 Packet Pg. 249 8.2.b Land Acquisition Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution — General Fund Stormwater — Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding Project Accounting #M070 E L O L- a. c m E a� O a E r .Q U Ca a m r U m u_ �a .Q c� U ti N O N N N O N N N O O. O L a IL v a u_ U r- N O N N N O N N N O O_ O L- a. U) lid a. N C N E m V r Q r C N E L V 2 Q Page 13 Packet Pg. 250 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 8: Community Park & Athletic Complex Phase II (CFP Only) 23200 100`h Ave. W — Former Woodway High School Project Summary: Two projects - Phase I lighting, Phase II renovation of existing underdeveloped athletic field Project Justification: By adding lighting to the newly renovated Phase I year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility would significantly increase. Phase II would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs offset by user fees. Phase I was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II estimated at $6-8M. Estimated Cost: $6-8M 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total TotalConstruction ------- Real Estate Excise Tax 11 - '125Bond ------- Proceeds Total Unsecured Funding ------- $6-8 M Page 14 Packet Pg. 251 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 9: Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) 600 3rd Avenue South — City Park Project Summary: The 40+ year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and needs major renovation or replacement and is currently too small to accommodate staff and needed work areas. Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. Estimated Cost: $3 — 4M Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees— Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution — General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue Unsecured Funding Page 15 Packet Pg. 252 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK A: Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Project Summary: The City of Edmonds owns, operates, and maintains 47 parks and open spaces consisting of more than 230 acres and including a mile of Puget Sound beach and shoreline. Funding allocation for major maintenance, replacements and small capital projects for the city-wide parks and recreation amenities including paved and soft -surface trails, bridges, playgrounds, sports courts, athletic fields, skate park, Yost pool, restrooms, pavilion, picnic shelters, fishing pier, lawn areas, parking lots, fencing, lighting, flower poles, monument and interpretative signage and related infrastructure. Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs, increased city liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. The 2016 PROS Plan Goal #7 is to provide a high quality and efficient level of maintenance for all parks and related public assets in Edmonds. Estimated Cost: $2,405,000 (6-year total) i Repair & Maintenance 1 $105,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $2,105,000 Professional Services $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Total Expenses $155,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $155000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $155,000 $450,000 $450,000 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 $0 Page 16 Packet Pg. 253 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK B: Beautification Program Project Summary: Beautification to include flower plantings, irrigation and mulch in multiple areas throughout town for example: outdoor plazas, corner parks, the library, Frances Anderson Center, streetscapes, gateways and hanging flower baskets. Project Justification: Improve beautification and provide comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees. This program is highly supported by volunteers in the community. Baskets and corner parks are sponsored resulting in about $19,000 of contributions a year in additional funding. Estimated Cost: $21,000 per year / $126,000 (6-year total) Page 17 Packet Pg. 254 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK C: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program Project Summary: Acquisition of land when feasible that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS plan. $700,000 is currently reserved for park land and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated in 2019, 2020 and 2021. There is no request to purchase a specific property at this time. Project Justification: There are large areas of Edmonds where the Parks, open space and recreation facilities level of service is below adopted standards; particularly on the Hwy 99 corridor. This is a priority in the PROS plan. Estimated Cost: TBD, funds accumulated in preparation for land acquisition opportunities total $3,094,000 over 6 years. Land — Park Facilities Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $900,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,900,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $1,194,000 Total Revenue $1,099,000 $399,000 1 $399,000 1 $399,000 1 $399,000 1 $399,000) 1 Unsecured Funding � I $3,094,000 Page 18 Packet Pg. 255 8.2.b CIP/CFP COMPARISON 2021-2022 Fund Project Name CFP Description New Projects Added 125 Playground Upgrade Program Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide additional inclusive playgrounds / facilities providing access for children of all ages and abilities. 125 Yost Pool Repair Regular Maintenance to re -plaster the pool to replace and repair the failing plaster. Pool will be forced to close without repair. Projects Removed 125 Greenhouse Replacement 2021 Project Projects Changed 125 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Postponed until 2025 125 Waterfront Walkway Completion Moved to fund 125 125 Civic Center Playfield X Utilizing $2M from REET and not the General Fund 125 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Increase in funding 2023-2027 Page 19 Packet Pg. 256 8.2.c Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) City Council — October 26, 2021 Packet Pg. 257 8.2.c CFP & CIP Format Changes Combined CFP & CIP Document Packet Pg. 258 8.2.c CFP & CIP Format Changes Public Works & Utilities Department TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECTS "°° i- PWf-,B PWi.t, Projects . �wer • SlOrmw0ler aWr.21 • StreeV1nrer—ion Project Pw, car c.t,-o: 1 o Non-Motori]ett T—sportetion Project I • Water PYVr-03 Sneet/Interslttian Prajht GVYI-05 PIVi-1] rypn-mi tcti]eP Tr PSpOMfim W.jW •I Y PWt 3� vWl.jS vwr.l, vwr.ts PWf11 A vwr as / vwr-tt Citywide Project Maps Public Works & Utilities Department TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECTS A6-� Projects G Server Stormwater • Street/intersection Project a Non -Motorized Transportation Protect AG-J o Water Sewer _. . , Street/intersection Project �ri1Mi.O5 Non -Motorized Transportation Project 1FM WPWr•3 i PWW-09 PWD-05 • PWT-491 W l I Packet Pg. 259 8.2.c CFP & CIP Format Changes rCapital Nui Facilities Project Project List 2022 7mou e De Pac n t` N O CM N N CD N O 0. O L a 0 CU r- (D U) 4) a a� r TOTAL 06 � L O 1 # # CFP PROJECT ) 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (20 7) (2028-42) Preservation / Maintenance Proiects PWT-01 Nnnual Street Preservation Program 76 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,00 $9,186,OOC $24,750,00 PWT-02 34th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW 84 $5,780 $0 $0 $0 $ $ $5,78 $ PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. 78 $1,663,723 $0 $0 $0 $ $ $1,663,72 $ PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. $0 $157,000 $780,000 $0 $ $ $937,00 $ PWT-05 -Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $450,00 $ $530,00 $ PWT-06 i nal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $150,0001 $700,00 $ $850,00 $ PWT-07 iMain St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,00 $350,00 $450,00dl Safety/ Capacity Analysis PWT-08 X 28th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor PWT-09 X lHwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 PWT-10 X lHwv 99 Revitalization & Gatewav Proiect - Staoe 3 to _ 41O L �o v Packet Pg. 260 8.2.c CFP & CIP Format Changes New Project Sheets p.eieN De+<, � p5�cn ,iiai pa�eu..�u preservnlon po5ram to mmmam Cny srrtns. Ma—, rile WI parertln[ mFrastnrc[ure arM reduces Me need fin Dryer opita[ uxestment lu rebuild Dry sleets I.ft.ftd Inl•d C" $1.500.000 Devgn 532'— S—.— sm— sl5a,oao S1o0.0W 51.— R(PEdSViF Cadh,adun S1,Z)S,afO SI 35a,0fO 51iSa,Wp 51236,dm 51 ASD,apO $1,d50,aW iaR.s<Tnld S45W,Wo SI,SWpW S1.SW,— 541.6,Wa 546WAW 54650,Wo street Fund lu-Gxia6rduln-errodal 5150,® 51»� StsO,am 52,250.® REEFimrd 115 $SW,aW PERfWdld6 55m,Wp SI fAD,® $S,Sm,am 51,266� S1,SOOSm 51,SDa,Om S22,Sm,mO TraltpvtaOdn Inpel Ilea 6[sanl FVId 55W,pW slwmealer Uterty FU a22 Fe . Gtanss ale Grabs Unsecvtd Funbns Ftadwy Souse Trial SI,SW,o00 $I,5eM1,pa0 $45W,o0a S43a6.p S1650,dW 51,65a,pa0 S2�25a,pda Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK lCivic Center Playfielcl J11 310 6^ Are. N - Delentuu,rs EdmarW s l+FpjM Summary: An 8-acre dawmown pxk 6enbpment supporte0 b1' $3 9]M n rJam TUlld,tt(, 55 3M n b6rM5, 51.3M 'm Pal6 IMI a Fees and S3,9M m Nea! Esrxe Exam lax. Thrs sgnattrte polec't brake around n MI`ust 2021 -6'is stated fw compledon W'aner MI22. Prale'n ]usdf dan: Thm e a multiyear desirn, hnd d-ai pmens aIM conmucrion proiect &at s a very hl;t Isramry m tM 2D16 PA05 pan.lne Master Plan prxess was robust wnn eelensne community input, Connr— besan AUNss 9, 202E artl s taldeway arW 2022 hMmP necessary to complete the protect. Em'maoedC nucden Cam: 513,M,000 iDdi 1A26 2a2a 2025 z.0 ID2] rPGI ®-----® Or M ®-----® ®-----® Uteeevre. FMId'Ini So SP —'aa dawnt tIC556 & C551 Packet Pg. 261 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities —Transportation 2022 Preservation Projects 2022 Pavement Preservation Program DP#76($1.5M) • 6 Lane Miles • 10 New ADA Ramps 76th Ave Overlay DP#78($1.6M) • 1961h St to Olympic View Dr • City of Lynnwood • 2.8 Lane Miles (1.4 in Edmonds) • 15 New ADA Ramps (10 in Edmonds) 84th Ave Overlay Project Close-out DP#84($5k) Packet Pg. 262 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities —Transportation 2022 Safety & Capacity Proiects • Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway DP#80($7.6M) • Hwy 99 2441"St-238t"St Stage 3 DP#81($640K) • Hwy 99 224t"St-220t"St Stage 4 DP#82($400K) • 76t" Ave/2201" St Intersection DP#83($276K) • SR-104 Adaptive System DP#86 ($150K) • Traffic Signal Upgrades DP#88($30K) • Guardrail Program DP#95($20K) ti N O N N N O N 0 0. O L. a O d N d L a N d N Y L O a N O N l� Packet Pg. 263 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities —Transportation 2022 Active Transportation Projects & Planning • Citywide Bicycle Improvements DP#79($1.5M) • Citywide Pedestrian Improvement DP#85($10K) • Pedestrian Safety Program DP#87($20K) • Design Assistance for Concrete Crews DP#89($20k) • Elm Way Walkway DP#93($901K) • Traffic Calming Program DP#94($33K) Packet Pg. 264 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2022 Water Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#46($486K) • Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment DP#47($505K) • Waterline Overlays DP#49($175K) • 2022 Replacement Program DP#50($2.1M) ram- Packet Pg. 265 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2022 Stormwater Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#52($312K) • Lake Ballinger Regional Facility DP#54($300K) • Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr DP#55($190K) • Stormwater Overlays DP#57($60K) • 2022 Replacement Program DP#58($1.45M) • Perrinville Creek Basin Projects • Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration DP#53($550K) • Seaview Park Infiltration Ph 2 DP#59($555K) • Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt DP#60($121K) • Green Street & Rain Gardens DP#61($400K) Packet Pg. 266 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2022 Sewer Utility • 2023 Replacement Program DP#62($336K) • Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation DP#63($482K) • Sewerline Overlays DP#64($60K) • 2022 Replacement Program DP#65($1.6M) 2022 WWTP • Carbon Recovery Project DP#67($1.16M) ti N O N N N O N 0 0. 0 L. a CU _ L 4 a. 71, a+ Q Packet Pg. 267 8.2.c Public Works & Utilities — Facilities • Boys &Girls Club • Cemetery Building • Historic Museum • Library • City Hall • Meadowdale Club House • Fishing Pier • Old Public Works • Frances Anderson Center • Parks Maintenance Bldg • Fire Station 16 • Fire Station 17 • Fire Station 20 • Historic Log Cabin • Public Safety • Public Works O&M • Wade James Theater • Yost Pool House ti N O N N N O N N N 0 0. 0 L. a c 0 CU A) 0 a 04 N CD N L d O 0 M N E L � V r r _ Q C t V R a+ Q Packet Pg. 268 8.2.c Facilities Repair and Maintenance Bond $ GF $ Solar Plant Renewal $150k Grant Application (45%) - FAC (9.6 kw) & Public Safety (100kw) $ 230,000 $ 162,500 Citywide EV Charging Stations Add 10 Public EV Charging Stations $ 260,000 $ PW Yard Repairs & Leveling Facilities Portion - Balance from W/S Utilities $ 110,000 $ City Fleet EV Charging For 2022 Electric -powered new Vehicles (6 stations) $ 90,000 $ Historic Museum Structural Reinforcement at roof $ 10,000 Library Repairs West Deck Flashing $ 60,000 $ Interior & Ext. Painting FAC, FS16, Meadowdale Clubhouse $ 230,000 $ Security PS Pedestrian Perimeter Fencing $ 270,180 Unforeseen Repair and City Wide Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 1,292,680 Plus Solar Grant $ 67,500 $ 1,360,180 $ Total 260,000 110,000 90,000 $ 10,000 60,000 230,000 $ 270,180 $ 100,000 912,500 $ 380,180 Bonds General Fund aD E U E Inc. t 89� Oz- a) t V Q Q Packet Pg. 269 8.2.c CIP/CFP Schedule July • City staff begins development of capital budgets August/September • Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance • Prepare draft UP and CIP October • Planning Board (October 13tn) • City Council Presentation (October 26tn) • Planning Board Public Hearing (October 27tn) November/December • City Council Public Hearing (November 15t) • Adopt CFP into the Comprehensive Plan (December 141n) ti N O N N N O N d 0 0. 0 L a c 0 R r- L D 7;, N L 0 a N 0 N N L d O c,> M E r r CEO NINE M Packet Pg. 270 8.2.c Questions ti N O N N N O N d fA O O. O L. IL c O R c a� m L CL ^ _ W N 0 CL O N O N L d O c,> A M C C t C� r r+ Q Packet Pg. 271 8.2.c End ti N O N N N O N d fA O O. O L. IL c O R c a� m L CL ^ _ W N L O CL O N O N L d O c,> A M C C t C� r r+ Q Packet Pg. 272 8.2.d Parks 2022-2027 CIP / UP �a .Q �a U ti N O N N N O N Complete 2022 Parks, Recreation & y Open Space (PROS) Plan Update o L- a. Complete Civic Park Redevelopment s M Deferred Maintenance/Capital P L Replacement Program a U a Prepare for Future Large Projects 0 • Land Acquisition • Marsh Restoration a N • Marina Beach Park N • PROS Plan Priorities N L 1 d 0 U 1, It d of Fn,,y� t 1 V t. t. Q Packet Pg. 273 8.2.d 76 .Q U r` N O 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP Framework N N O ■ N Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Planning Timeline 2021 1st QTR 2nd QTR Parks Capital Projects/Contracted Work JAN FEB I MAR APR MAYJ JUN Civic Park Complex cc Yost Park - Civic Water Mitigation (2022) Waterfront Redevelopment X Fishing Pier Repair X Olympic Beach Pathway Olympic Beach Parking Lot Gateway Sign Installation Haines Wharf Slide Repairs New Property Clean-up/Securing Greenhouse Replacement Cemetery Columbarium Veteran's Kiosk Removal Brackett's North Restroom Refurb Park Maintenance/Major Maintenance Yost Park Bridges Repair Waterfront Redevelopment Signage X Museum Art Panel Installation X Hiring Staff (8) X Brackett's Landing North - Anchor Removal X City Park Pedestrian Safety Project Veteran's Plaza Sculpture Yost Pool Startup/Maintenance X Spray Pad Startup/Maintenance Portico Panel Installation X Brackett's North Entrance Gate Refurb Flower Basket / Corner Park Planting Veterans Plaza Flag Pole Sleeve Install Flower Pole Order / Replace (5) Library Bookdrop Removal Dayton Street Project Landscaping Holiday Light Installation 0) 2016 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan (PROS) Goals Q • Collaborative efforts to meet recreation and cultural needs a • Interconnected park system that includes cultural identity and natural environm • Preserve and expand shoreline O • Natural resource land for habitat conservation, recreation & environmental edul c on • Promote a healthy, active and engaged community through recreation N • Provide an engaged and vibrant community through arts and cultural opportuni a • High quality maintenance of parks and related amenities a_ U r a 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan (PROS) • Adoption February 2022 l4 • Recommended CIP/CFP a • City Comp Plan — reference N N s_ Parks Project List O • Deferred maintenance o • Small capital projects • Nearly 30 projects Grant Funding eligibility r Q no C 0) �rrc. 1 Rq� E t V fC Q Packet Pg. 274 8.2.d 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP Project Distribution I I PRK-03 PRK-01 ® PRK-06 PRK-05 PRK-07 • PRK-02 • ® PRK-09 • N PRK-08 �a .Q �a U ti N O N N N O N d N 0 0. 0 L a c 0 m C m m L a a_ U a LL U L a N O N O N L 0 U Cr C t V R El Packet Pg. 275 8.2.d Parks 2021-2027 CIP - New Format 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CIP # PROJECT �a .Q �a U r` N O N N N O N d Project -based versus Fund-ba 0 0. 2022 2023 1 2024 1 2025 1 2026 1 2027 6-Year Total L a 9 CIP/CFP ProjJects Civic Center Playfield X PRK 1 Redevelopment of 8-acre park consistent with Master Plan adopted in 2017; add restrooms, walking track, landscaping, inclusive playground, improve $ 9,755,742 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,7SS,742 field and lighting, skate park, petanque grove, tennisand multi sportscourts. ,.,a,,,,d ora , rd,n,,,,�,� r,,I—Lb Redevelop the park consistent with the Master Plan adopted in 2015; X PRK 2 Parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, permanent restrooms, $ - upgrade playarea, improve ADA Accessibility, add bridges over new alignment of Willow Creek. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Prioritized in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and State certified Creative PRK 3 District. Improvements encourage pedestrian traffic and provide visual $ connection between ECA and downtown contributing to economic vitality. Playground Upgrade Program Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacingto provide PRK 4 additional inclusive playgrounds/facilities providing accessfor children of all $ 175,000 ages and abilities. Yost Pool Repair 11 Regular maintenance to re -plaster the pool to replace and repair failing PRK 5 1 plaster. Pool will be forced to close without repair. $ 175,000 Waterfront Walkway Completion Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina PRK'6 Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums, $ - to provide ADA improvements. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Restoration of the Marsh to reconnect the Puget Sound within the Edmonds X PRK 7 Marsh and two fresh water creeks to provide fresh water / salt water estuary $ and natural tidal exchange. O f� 4 CIP Programs N d L a - $ 1,750,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 6,000,000 d 2022 Projects = Decision Pack a es LL U to 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,000,000 Y fC a N 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,050,000 N O N d 0 $ - $ - $ 175,000 O v 0 r - $ 500,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 d OF E D O� Zr U $ - $ - $ - ~ ON M Q a+ _ Inc. 189� (D E t V R Q Packet Pg. 276 8.2.d Parks 2021-2027 CIP - New Format 2022 -2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFP # PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 202S 2026 2027 6-Year Total Community Park & Athletic Complex -Phase II X PRK 8 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and construction of two additional fields. Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building X PRK 9 Replace and/or renovate deteriorating building in City Park. Project in $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ conceptual phase. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 10,107,764 $ 177,023 $ 2,427,024 $ 3,427,025 $ 3,927,026 $ 6,177,027 $ 26,230,742 PARKS CIP PROGRAMS Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program PRKA This ongoing program allocates funds for the regular maintenance, repair and $ 155,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,405,000 replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Beautification Program This ongoing program allocates funds to support beautification. Specifically PRK B flower plantings, irrigation and mulch in areas such as corner parks, landscape $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 126,000 beds, streetscapes and gateways as well as flower baskets. Park and Open Space Acquisition Program PRK C To acquire land for future parks and open spaces as opportunities become $ 1,099,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 3,094,000 available. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers PRK D Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfersto $ 193,832 $ 123,000 $ 148,000 $ 173,000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 $ 1,033,832 Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B)SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 1,468,832 $ 993,000 1 $ 1,018,000 1 $ 1,043,0001 $ 1,069,000 1 $ 1,069,000 1 $ 6,658,832 (C)TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES(A+B) $ 11,576,596 $ 1,170,023 1 $ 3,445,024 1 $ 4,470,025 1 $ 4,995,026 1 $ 7,245,027 $ 32,889,574 4 CIP Programs Packet Pg. 277 8.2.d Parks 2021-2027 CIP - New Format 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS CIP REVENUE 2022 2023 2024 202S 2026 2027 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,900,000 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 3,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 11,000,000 Park Impact Fees -Fund 332-100 $ 874,575 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 3,124,575 Tree Fund 143-Land Acquisition $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1,194,000 Operating Contribution - GeneralFund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Investment Interest (3%) $ 78,110 $ 39,793 $ 50,797 $ 31,381 $ 25,632 $ (539) $ 225,173 Donations $ 142,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 142,000 Bond Proceeds $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ - Secured Grants $ 2,728,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,728,000 Unsecured Grants $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,600,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 8,421,68S $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,390,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 $ 29,913,748 i6-Year Overview 2022 1 2023 1 2024 1 2025 1 2026 1 2027 1 6-Year Total Beginning Fund Balance (Accts 332 + 332-100) $ 4,554,645 $ 1,399,734 $ 2,618,504 $ 1,573,276 $ 1,483,632 $ 463,238 $ 12,093,029 Revenue $ 8,421,685 $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,380,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 $ 29,913,748 Expenditures $ 11,576,596 $ 1,170,023 $ 3,445,024 $ 4,470,025 $ 4,995,026 $ 7,245,027 $ 32,901,721 (37%i (29%) �a .Q �a U r` N O N N N O N 0) N O 0. O L a C O M C d to d L a a_ U r a LL U In Y L fC a N O N O N L d O U lr It OF EDA, t V �N M rno a+ C El Packet Pg. 278 8.2.d PRK 1: Civic Center Playfield - i K 4 t;t r 771 I t iiv- Planning & Design Construction $9,755,742 Total Expenses $9,755,742 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $2,898,672 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 $1,352,620 Bond Proceeds $1,634,450 Federal Grant (LWCF) $500,000 RCO State Grants $850,000 Snohomish County Grants $450,000 Verdant Grant $170,000 Hazel Miller Foundation Grant $1,500,000 State Appropriation / DOC Grant $258,000 Park Donations $142,000 F Eb Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $9,755,742 $0 Packet Pg. 279 8.2.d PRK 2: Marina Beach Park Improvements 10- �ff-l= M ; :3 Planning & Design ,. $600,000 2025 2026 2027 Construction $1,150,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 Total Expenses $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $750,000 $1,000,000 Fund 332 Balance+ Park Impact Fees $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,150,000 Secured Grants $1,000,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,150,000 00 000 • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $61VII • Renovation to better serve community • ADA Improvements • Daylighting Willow Creek Packet Pg. 280 8.2.d PRK 3: 41hAvenue Cultural Corridor Planning & Design ,, 2025 $800,000 2026 2027 Construction $200,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,01 Total Expenses $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,01 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,Of • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $8M • Priority in State -Certified Creative District • Priority in 2014 Community Cultural Plan • No funding source currently identified Packet Pg. 281 8.2.d PRK 4: Playground Upgrade Program Planning & Design ,, 2025 2026 2027 Construction $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,00( Total Expenses $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,00( Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,00( Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Secured Grants Total Revenue $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,00( • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $1,050,000 • Upgrade playgrounds to be inclusive • Goal is one per year • Some playgrounds 35+ years old The Sierra Park Playground 5 —12 year olds OF Epp A. v Packet Pg. 282 8.2.d PRK 5: Yost Pool Repair Planning & Design Construction $175,000 Total Expenses $175,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $175,000 $0 • Re -plaster Yost Pool • Routine Maintenance/10 years • Necessary to continue operating the pool �a .Q �a DI N N N O N d N O 0. O L a Packet Pg. 283 8.2.d �a .Q �a U N 0 N N N 0 PRK 6: Waterfront WalkwavCOMDletion - Ebb Tide Sectiol d 0 a 0 a` Planning & Design 2022 20231 $125,000 125 2026 20 Construction $375,000 $750,000 Total Expenses $500,000 $750,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $500,000 $750,000 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution —general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $500,000 1 $750,000 1 • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $1,250,000 • Improve safety mobility challenges or strollers • Shoreline Permit approved • Easement currently under legal review _ 0 �a c m a U a U- M a N 0 N N L d O a+ U 0 v M r r a E L v c� Q Packet Pg. 284 8.2.d PRK 7: Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Land Acquisition Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution — General Fund Stormwater— Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding �q c. 1890 �a .Q �a I N tiO N N N O N d N O 0. O L a Packet Pg. 285 8.2.d PRK 8: Community Park & Ath Phase 1 �a .Q �a U PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVIC, N . O N N N O letic Complex Ph 2 (CFP Only N 0 0. 0 L a c 0 Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fee's — Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $6-8 �a c m d a U a LL U M a N O N O N • Former Woodway High School site • In partnership with the Edmond School District o • Phase I — lighting to significantly expand usage � • Phase 2 - on hold O� ED O i V M r r r Q IN C i„ E L v cra Q Packet Pg. 286 8.2.d PRK 9: Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fee's— Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution —General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue Unsecured Funding • Current building 40+ years old • Long-term planning purposes only, must secure funding Packet Pg. 287 8.2.d PRK A: Citywide Park Improvements/Capital Replacement Progra • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $2,405,000 • Significant maintenance backlog throughout park system • Prioritization driven by community input through PROS plan and safety Packet Pg. 288 8.2.d .Q N, O N N PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVIC] O PRK B: Beautification Program 0 0. 0 L a c 0 �a c m m L a a_ U a LL U M a N O N Total 6-year Cost Estimate: $126,000 N Flower plantings, irrigation and mulch o Outdoor plazas, corner parks, streetscapes, gateways, flower baskets, etc o $19,000 per year in sponsorship revenue V �� v �O M r r r a+ E L v c� Q Packet Pg. 289 8.2.d PRK C: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program • Total 6-year Cost Estimate: TBD based on opportunities that arise • Property supports PROS Plans priorities • $3,094,000 accumulated by 2027 ($700,000 from prior years) Packet Pg. 290 8.2.e CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Virtual Meeting Via Zoom October 13, 2021 Chair Rosen called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Mike Rosen, Chair Alicia Crank, Vice Chair Roger Pence Richard Kuehn Judi Gladstone Matt Cheung BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Todd Cloutier (excused) Nathan Monroe (excused) STAFF PRESENT Eric Engmann, Planning Division Rob Chave, Planning Division Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Robert English, Public Works OTHER PRESENTERS PRESENT rn Steve Toy, Snohomish County c Chair Rosen: Calls the meeting to order. Matt Cheung: Reads Land Acknowledgement. 2 L Eric Engmann: Does roll call. Present: Rosen, Crank, Pence, Kuehn, Gladstone, Cheung. Excused Absence: Cloutier, Monroe. Introduces Angie Feser, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services; Shannon Burley, Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services; Rob Chave, Planning Manager; Robert English, City Engineer; Steve Toy, Snohomish County Principal Demographer. Packet Pg. 291 8.2.e Approval of Minutes Chair Rosen: Discusses the minutes from September 22nd. Asks for comments (none) then for a motion (moved for approval and seconded). Motion to Adopt the September 22nd Minutes. Motion Passes 5-1, J. Gladstone opposed. Announcement of the Agenda Chair Rosen: Discusses the meeting agenda format. Asks if the simplified agenda from the last meeting can be used instead. Eric Engmann: Asks to retain the longer agenda format for the time being. Staff is reevaluating the formats for all boards and committees. Chair Rosen: Discusses the agenda. Thanks Steve Toy for returning to discuss the Buildable Lands Report. Audience Comments Chair Rosen: Introduced audience comments and asks if anyone wishing to speak. Eric Engmann: States Natalie Seitz is in the audience Natalie Seitz: Comments on the Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. • Struck by the number of facilities in the bowl downtown, it even needs an inset map. • Noticed that the downtown lighting improvements were not shown on the map. • The planned improvements in the SR99 Corridor go well beyond the six -year timeframe which gives the impression of more investment in this area than is planned. • Questions the basis for Mathay-Ballinger Park being described as "underutilized." • Mentions green storm water infrastructure at Mathay-Ballinger can take away from active recreation space. Asks about ways to mitigate the loss of recreation during construction. • Requests sidewalk improvement projects be extended to Mathay-Ballinger. (No other public comment) Administrative Reports - Snohomish County Buildable Lands Program Chair Rosen: Introduces Steve Toy to discuss the Buildable Lands Report. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 2 Packet Pg. 292 8.2.e Steve Toy: Introduces himself and thanks the Board for the opportunity to speak. What is the Buildable Lands Report (BLR) and How is it Used? • County Council adopted the Buildable Lands Report on 9/8/21. • Buildable Land Report is required by the Growth Management Act for seven Washington counties. • The report looks back at how implementation of GMA cognitive plans and zoning for growth accommodation and densities is performing. • It requires a periodic evaluation of the urban densities, and based on those densities, looks at the adequacy of the remaining urban capacity for accommodating the adopted growth targets. • It relies on a centralized data processing GIS system approach using the County's GIS resources. • It is the central repository for the buildable lands information and a comprehensive report or all 20 cities and unincorporated areas in the county. • Discusses how COVID affected the report process. 2021 BLR Mapping for City of Edmonds • Discusses how the parcels are categorized in the model to estimate buildable land capacity. • Compared this model to the growth targets in 2035 assess growth capacity. • Most of Edmonds is a green color, which means there isn't an anticipated change of land use or intensity on those sites up to 2035. • Uses zoning and future land use designations to determine density. • The 99 Corridor is a source of a significant portion of the city's additional capacity, also Edmonds Way and the Westgate area. a • These same areas have a larger amount of employment capacity. • Mentions that CG zoning changes, since 2018, are factored into the density assumptions going forward. • Shows the 3D mapping to visualize buildable densities. a • Discusses specific developments that are shown on the map. T • Discusses the differences between what was predicted and what was developed. M • Developments are coming in at higher densities than predicted in Edmonds and c across the County. m • Edmonds is shown as having adequate redevelopment area to handle population a and employment growth to 2035. 4; Mentions that this is a summary and asks for any questions. Chair Rosen: Thanks Steve and ask the Board if they have questions. Roger Pence: Has a few questions and was the advocate for holding this session. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 3 Packet Pg. 293 8.2.e • Appreciates the verification that Edmonds has the existing capacity to absorb the expected or desired population growth out to 2035 and will watch the 2044 projections to see how things develop. • Asks Steve to explain the green (single-family) area which is defined as constant/replacement. What does that mean? Steve Toy: States the constant/replacement means that there is no net increase in residential capacity anticipated on those parcels. There may be tear downs but is neutral in capacity. Roger Pence: States the downtown area jumps out as an issue. • Area is mostly shown as blue, which means redevelopable. • States that isn't how he sees downtown, asks for that to be explained. Steve Toy: States that it is potentially redevelopable. • It passes the test regarding the relationship between building assessed value and land assessed value; the land is worth more than the building. • States that may not adequately address conditions in Central Edmonds, but that's the reason. Rob Chave: States that the market factors aren't equally distributed around the city. • Some blue areas may be more redevelopable. • Notes that downtown is a bit different. • Mentions the downtown rents, height limitations, and high property costs there. • Even though they show as blue areas, it's not necessarily be very redevelopable Roger Pence: States that his stance is that they are older buildings, but not obsolete. Provides an example of how older buildings in Seattle are being reused. Rob Chave: States that this information is very hard to predict, especially in a 10-to-20-year timeframes. Market conditions can change. Steve Toy: Provides the example of the CG zoning changes, and how that changed the market conditions over time. Lists other examples in surrounding cities. Chair Rosen: Asks for any other questions. (none) Thanks him for his time and helping to understand the methodology and usage of the Report. Rob Chave: Mentions that this analysis will be an important piece of information for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. States that an additional positive takeaway from Steve's presentation was seeing development densities outpace projections. New Business - Presentation of Proposed 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 4 Packet Pg. 294 8.2.e Chair Rosen: Introduces the new item. Angie Feser: Mentions Public Works will present first, then Parks. Discusses how questions and answers can be done between each presentation. Robert English: Provides background on the 2022 to 2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). • CFP projects are new projects, projects that increase, or expand existing services to address growth. • This is done on a six year and 20-year horizon. • The CIP projects includes those CFP projects plus maintenance projects; provides some examples. • The format has changes to consolidate both documents into one, based on Angie's previous experiences. • Public Works includes transportation, water, storm water, sewer, wastewater treatment plant projects, and facility projects. • Also includes a citywide project map and is organized depending on whether it is in the CFP or the CIP. Explains components of the CFP. • The decision package numbers for the 2022 budget are information given to City Council. • There's a project description, the benefits the project provides, and the justification. • Each project has an estimated total project cost. c • It includes the anticipated revenue that's offsetting the expenditure. c • A table identifies the planned expenditures by phase. a • When funding is secured, we identify it as having financial funds, grant funding, or other source. 3 c • Many projects were unsecured. They're important projects but haven't been able to 2 secure funding at this point. L 2022 Transportation Projects Grouping • In 2022, there is $1.5 million programmed for the pavement preservation program. That would pave six lane miles of city streets and add ten new ADA ramps. • Discusses the joint project with the City of Lynnwood on 76tb Avenue between 196th Street to Olympic View. 2022 Safety and Capacity Projects • A big focus is on the Highway 99 Corridor. The Highway 99 revitalization and gateway project are in the design phase. Going into construction in 2022. That's why the program amount is $7.6 million. It's a safety project to minimize the accidents occurring from that two-way left turn lane. • Also adds a hawk signal for pedestrian crossing just north of 2341h Street and Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 5 Packet Pg. 295 8.2.e gateway signage at either end of the city limits. • Stages 3 and 4, are going into the design phase in 2022. Stage 3 is the very southern segment between 244th Street up to 2381h Street. Stage 4, the portion between 2241b and 2201h Street, received a federal grant to begin the design phase. • Another project in design is the 76tb/220th intersection improvements. That will continue into 2022. • Another project is the State Route 104 adoptive system. This will coordinate five traffic signals along State Route 104 to improve the timing and coordination of the signal system. That's moving into the design phase in 2022. • The other two programs replace guard rails and make traffic signal upgrades. 2022 Active Transportation Projects and Planning • Several large projects being pursued in 2022. • The citywide bicycle improvements project is another project to build bike lanes within the city. It won a grant from the Sound Transit. • The Elm Way Walkway is a new sidewalk between 8th and 9th Avenue and over $900,000 going into construction. • The transportation plan update was last updated in 2015 and going to start the process in 2022. Hoping to get lot of public input and comment on that plan. • Traffic calming program will continue in 2022. • Pedestrian safety programs include funding rectangular rapid flashing beacon signs with flashing lights to cross busy streets. • The citywide pedestrian improvement project includes Main Street and adds a crosswalk and RFBs (rapid flashing beacons). 2022 Water Utility o • $2.1 million per round for construction, that would be around 4,000 to 5,000 lineal a feet as replacement. Will start design for the 2023 program. • Assessing the Yost and Seaview reservoirs to evaluate maintenance needs. 2022 Stormwater Utility L • The first two replace old, deteriorated pipe or undersized pipe within the city. $1.45 0 million set for this program in 2022. N • The Edmonds Marsh water quality improvements are continuing to design in 2022 to add water treatment to the catch basins along State Route 104. • The Perrinville Creek Basin projects, three are planned within our basin. The first one is a flow management project, mostly rain gardens to keep runoff out of Perrinville and reduce some of those peak storm water flows within the creek. • Lower Perrinville Creek restoration is going to be a much larger project in the upcoming years. • Seaview Park Infiltration Phase 2. This is a state grant project. Phase 1 was built a couple of years ago. Will go into construction in 2022 and add onto the infiltration facility up there. The purpose is to take some of that runoff out of the Perrinville Creek system. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 6 Packet Pg. 296 8.2.e • Lake Ballinger Regional Facility will continue with design in 2022. That's an infiltration facility looking at infiltration options to reduce the flows into Lake Ballinger. • Green street and rain gardens. The primary source of funding was related to COVID. It allows opportunities for bioretention and rain gardens and to try to take care of the storm water runoff and water quality. • Storm water overlays are used to overlay streets that have been cut by the replacement program. • Going to have the storm and surface water comprehensive plan update starting in 2022. 2022 Sewer Utility • Mainly a replacement program. • Also have the pipe rehabilitation program, where we rehabilitate the pipe from the inside. • We have the sewer line overlays that extend on the other two utilities. 2022 Wastewater Treatment Plant • The capital replacement projects, are a maintenance program to keep everything up and running at the plant. Public Works and Utilities - Facilities Mentions the facility project sheets in the packet aren't complete. Will have them updated before the public hearing. It includes the list of locations or facilities that the city maintains. City council acted earlier in the year to bond for $4.4 million to take care of some of the backlogged maintenance on these facilities. Takes questions on the Public Works portion of the presentation. d Chair Rosen: Thanks Rob for reducing 115 pages to a few slides and for the presentation. Asks if the Board has questions. L Judi Gladstone: Has a few questions. N • Asks about the order for the priority rankings and years they are shown. • Asks why some lower ranked sidewalk projects are shown earlier than higher priorities that are farther back. m Robert English: States that is part of the challenge, especially on walkway projects. The difficulty is finding a funding source within the local city funds to pay for those projects. Typically, sidewalk projects are built with securing grants. The priority doesn't necessarily mean that's how they are scored on a grant competition. Provides examples. Judi Gladstone: Asks if most of the grants are state or federal. Notes that some sidewalks pushed Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 7 Packet Pg. 297 8.2.e out are sidewalks on more well -traveled roads where they become safety hazards. Asks about the capacity in the utility CFPs for the transportation projects. Is interested in the impacts on utilities because there are utility relocation costs associated with many transportation projects. (Dialogue between Judi and Rob to better understand the question) Judi Gladstone: Is there capacity within the utility CIP to accommodate those utility projects or are they going to hold up the transportation projects? Or will it delay other water projects or other sewer projects because the transportation projects come first? Robert English: Yes. The monies that are generated, is put into the water main, storm water, or sewer replacement programs. When a transportation project begins and it is largely funded by the grant, the replacement program monies are pulled out of those programs to upgrade the utilities within that transportation project. It could be upgrading the size of the water main or replacing it because of age. Doing it all as one project because that's the most efficient way to handle it. Judi Gladstone: Asks about the money allocated for the transportation plan. • Seems like half as much as allocated for the storm water plan • Asks about the level of analysis anticipated for the transportation plan, since most projects are pushed so far out. • Mentions the amount of analysis needed to meet growth demands; the order of the projects matters. Robert English: Mentions it is based on the costs for the two previous plans (2010 and 2015). • Increased the funding to account for some inflation. • Will know more once the consultant is selected and develops the scope of work. • Feels it is a reasonable funding number based on the previous history. Judi Gladstone: Asks why the transportation plan cost is about half that of the drainage or storm water plan. Robert English: Mentions the storm water plan involves modeling that is more complex and expensive than in the transportation plan. Part of the programing is the potential to do some basin modeling and storm water projections. The transportation plan also has a modeling component, but it's the detail in the storm water plan that gets expensive. Judi Gladstone: Says that makes sense. Will look forward to seeing both of those plans. Mentions it will be good for the Planning Board to look at it, in terms of the vision for the city. Roger Pence: Mentions the Elm Way Walkway, one block between 81b and 9th avenue, and the Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 8 Packet Pg. 298 8.2.e $900,000 cost. Asks why the cost is so high. Robert English: Mentions the cost is based on the 30% design estimate generated by the consultant. • States that it is the cost of building sidewalks and that why it is difficult to fund sidewalk projects. • Mentions it is also the management, inspection, and documentation that's required to get the project to completion. So, it also includes staff and consultant time. Roger Pence: Asks if it included the conventional curb and gutter. Robert English: Confirms. Roger Pence: Asks to consider some less expensive ways of providing pedestrian safety on some streets. Chair Rosen: Asks about the time gap for sidewalks projects that don't show up until 2025. Robert English: Talks about the timing of projects on the CIP timeline. • Projects within that three-year horizon have realistic this is secured or expected to be secured. • Projects that don't have any funding yet, are put in the back three years of the plan. • Projects can move up if successful grant applications are received. Chair Rosen: Asks that this information be included in the presentation for the public hearing. Thinks it sends a good message that you don't plan to spend money you don't and shows fiscal responsibility Asks about the downtown lighting. Why there, is it to address a safety issue, is it to increase walkability in the early evening? c Robert English: States the downtown lighting project has been in the plans for several years and was added because of the high volume of pedestrians. Needs to be shown because o of potential funding from Sound Transit associated with the area around the station. r Chair Rosen: Asks about the Perrinville flooding. Will the project fix the problem, including in an extreme event? Robert English: Mentions that Perrinville Creek is a system that is overtaxed in higher rain events. • This project will not completely solve the problem, and not for extreme events. • This will help address some constraints at the lower end of Perrinville Creek. • The mayor set aside some ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) money for that project. • Also has funding to address some of the upper reaches to try to reduce intake. Mentions it is a complex system with a lot of inputs. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 9 Packet Pg. 299 8.2.e Has talked with Lynnwood about contributing and updating their storm water code to address some of the issue within their city limits. Reiterates that staff is working on solutions to help. Chair Rosen: Mentions that they talked last year about pipe replacement at 1 % per yet. Asks if they are still using the 100-year replacement plan? Robert English: Mentions this was primarily focused on the water main replacement program. This would replace one percent a year, which equates about a mile of replacement for the waterline program. Chair Rosen: Asks to share that information clearly so the public understands the reality and the constraints. Asks how many rapid flashing signs r20,000.00 buys. Robert English: States that it is about two if city crews install them, $7,000 to $10,000 per crossing. It is almost double if a contractor does it, more like $15,000. Chair Rosen: Asks for question from the other Board members. Roger Pence: Discusses lighting in the Westgate district. Talks about the standards for lighting for a major intersection in State Highway 104. Asks how to get adequate lighting on a major spot like that. Robert English: Mentions there are sometimes opportunities on existing utility poles to add lights. He can talk with Street Operations to look for opportunities. Reiterates that he will have a conversation see what evaluation has been done at that intersection. Roger Pence: Would like to see it addressed. Mentions the difficulty with getting PUD to replace a burned -out light there for years. Judi Gladstone: Asks about the $500,000 contributed from the general fund in 2022 but nothing from the general fund moving forward. Asks if this is typical or could $500,000 be used in the future to fund a sidewalk project. Robert English: Mentions the challenge in balancing the different needs that a city must fund. • The general fund isn't typically used for large contributions to capital improvements. • There was no contribution last year, they are very fortunate this year. • Council still has to approve this $500,000 in the budget, so it isn't finalized yet. • Mentions it is great to add sidewalks but there are also streets and existing sidewalks to maintain with very limited funding. Judi Gladstone: Asks if this is typical in other cities. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 10 Packet Pg. 300 8.2.e Robert English: Mentions that it is pretty typical. Provides some examples of minor differences. Chair Rosen: Asks for any more questions for Rob (none). Asks for Angie and Shannon to begin their presentation. Parks Portion of the CFP/CIP Presentation. Angie Feser: Introduces herself and Shannon Burley. Will share the parks component of the CIP/CFP. • Mentions they are completing the 2022 PROS Plan. It will be discussed with the Planning Board starting in November. • There will be a CFP and CIP plan readjustment and adopted based on the community priorities through that process. Deferred Maintenance/Capital Replacement Program • This is an inventory of the status of the Parks system. • There is a lot of deferred maintenance, they are focusing safety projects or playgrounds. • The pool also requires a lot of attention • There are infrastructure projects like the surfaces of parking lots, trails, and courts. • These need to be identified and mapped out for deferred maintenance and future upkeep. 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP Framework • Discusses how the CFP and CIP are set up. • Shows the ties to the City's Comp Plan via reference. • Started mapping out projects based on the timing and resources they need. • Mentions there are some projects that don't have a dollar amount associated with them and are pushed way out. The purpose for showing them is long-term planning. • Discusses the map of park projects and their geographic distribution. Acknowledges that there are a lot of resources spend in the bowl area. Will hope to address that better in the PROS Plan. • Shows that the items are now project based rather than funding based. • The projects closer to 2022 and 2023 have a lot more detail and a lot more accurate cost estimates than those in the later years. • There are nine true capital projects, those in the CIP in the category called the CIP projects which are more general. • Mentions the new CIP identified the revenue sources and funding allocation through the six years. Mentions the sources of the funding. • REET funds and park impact fees are really important. • Mentions the new tree fund that is tied to land acquisition. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 11 Packet Pg. 301 8.2.e • There are no general fund monies for their CIP. • There are a couple of other sources; donations, bonds, secured grants, and unsecured grants. • The bottom of the sheet shows the "cashflow" of the program. The beginning fund balance of each year plus the revenue minus the expenditures then have ending fund balance. • Mentions Shannon did a lot of work to reformat this. Civic Center Playfield (Audio goes out) • Well under way, started in August. • The entire budget is $13.7 million right now and $4 million of that is for this year. 2022 allocation of $9.7 million. • Mentions there are many revenue sources for this project. Marina Beach Part Improvements • A renovation to better serve the community. • Accommodates the new alignment for Willow Creek. • Includes a new parking lot configuration, overlooks areas, permanent restrooms, upgraded play area, improved ADA access, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges that go over Willow Creek and into the off -leash dog park area. • A new area for personal watercraft staging and launching. • Retaining the huge existing beach and driftwood area as well as the off -leash dog area. • Going to provide a lot of environmental education opportunities in this park with Willow Creek and someday have salmon come through that creek. • Awarded two grants for a total of $1 million and estimating that this project is close to $6 million. • Mapped it out over the years of when they'll be finishing the design work and moving into construction. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor • Still needs the final phase of design as well as construction. • Will be a pedestrian friendly and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way that it creates a strong visual connection from Main Street to Edmonds Center for the Arts along 41h Avenue. • Funding has not been secured at this time but earmark and map out what it might take to make this project happen. • This project is a priority for the state certification for the creative district and the City's cultural plan. Playground Upgrade Program • City maintains 15 playgrounds and only 2 of them are fully inclusive. • Mentions the Sierra Park playground, slated for 5 to 12-year-olds which is part of Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 12 Packet Pg. 302 8.2.e a functioning capital replacement program. • This process will include regularly scheduled updates to playgrounds, many are more than 35 years old. • There will be an annual allocation of $175,000 to upgrade playgrounds. • A part of the Mayor's initiative is to not just meet ADA, but to have inclusive level design. Yost Pool Repair • Was built 50 years ago and will have a 50-year celebration. • Needs to have its plaster lining replaces as part of a 10-year routine maintenance Waterfront Walkway Completion- Ebb Tide Section • Mentions that it is known as the Missing Link. • It's the one missing area in a mile that connects Brackets Landing North down to Marina Beach Park. • Currently doesn't have ADA accommodation and requires people to go down onto the beach cross the sand and then back up. • This section of walkway would be constructed within the city owned easement. • The walkway in front of the condos, the easement, and the design are currently under legal review. • It will be a few years before it is finished, shoreline permits are reviewed, and the project has been approved. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration • Would reconnect Puget Sound with the marsh and restore the natural tidal exchange. • Also impacts the proposed Marina Beach project, where Willow Creek comes in underneath the railroad. • Supports salmon recovery and improves water quality and habitat. • Helps to address sea level rise impacts. • Is an opportunity for recreation tourism and environmental educational. • This project is listed here because it might be in Park's CIP program. • Mentions this has been passionately debates of the last few years and that is why it is listed here without park funding. • Mentions the funding exists in the Public Works CIP and CFP. Community Park and Athletic Complex Phase 2 (CFP Only) • Mentions there are great grant opportunities for partnership in the renovation. • Are really two projects, one adds lighting to the Phase 1 improvements and the second is creating a multi -sport athletic field to increase usage. • Serves a densely populated area of 150,000 residents within a 5-mile radius of the site. • First phase was completed in 2015 for about $4 million. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 13 Packet Pg. 303 8.2.e • Estimates for Phase 2 are about $6 to $8 million. Parks and Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) It is undersized for the work being done there (mower repair, welding flower baskets, etc.) Also has a locker room, a meeting room, and is the only office space for the park's lead. Citywide Park Improvements/ Capital Replacement Program Mentions another component of the CIP is combining all the small projects into one category. It adjusted the CIP to have one fund for all these citywide improvements and capital replace programs required by our entire park system. • Discusses the Deferred Maintenance Program and how it contains a list with projects. • This is important to identify insufficiently maintained park and reduce higher maintenance costs down the road. • Delayed maintenance can increase the city's liability. • It helps achieve PROS Plan Goal 7, which is to provide a high quality and efficient level of maintenance service for all parks and facilities. • $155,000 is allocated in 2022. • Will need some time to get fully organized and get future projects laid out. • By 2023, that money is bumped up to $450,000 to work on these projects. Beautification Program N • It has an annual budget of $21,000 and support irrigation and mulch many areas of the city. c • The program is highly supported by volunteers. o • Additional funding is supplied by the Basket and Corner Parks sponsorship, which a contributes about $19,000 per year. c Park and Open Space Acquisition Program • Based on community priorities for open spaces. L • Allocation of about $700,000 reserved through 2021 REET funding. o • Tree code funds will also help with this. Estimates are about $200,000 a year from M fee -in -lieu and the fines. • The City is working on a few acquisitions, but they are still confidential until the approval of purchase. Finishes the presentation and thanks the Board. Takes questions on the Parks portion of the presentation. Chair Rosen: Thanks Angie and Shannon for the great presentation. Vice Chair Crank: Appreciates the streamlining of the presentation and having the two reports Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 14 Packet Pg. 304 8.2.e together. Recognizes the amount of work it took. Roger Pence: Asks if the Port is contributing to the marsh estuary restoration. Angie Feser: Reiterates that they don't have money earmarked for the restoration. Robert English: Isn't aware of any contributions by the Port. Roger Pence: Asks about the Missing Link at the Ebb Tide. • Is it in litigation? • Is the issue with the Ebb Tide Condominium? Shannon Burley: Mentions the litigation is about the easement itself. • The easement has been validated, but there are questions the easement being used to build a raised walkway. • Currently being disputed by the Ebb Tide Condominium Association. Roger Pence: Mentions the city's powers of eminent domain to acquire the legal rights to provide that pedestrian access. Shannon Burley: Mentions they are currently trying a different method. Judi Gladstone: Appreciates the connection to the goals of the plan. • Asks about the long-term planning and maintenance of Yost Pool. • Asks if there is clean up money available for the Chevron property by the marsh. Angie Feser: Mentions the Yost Pool is 50 years old and there was a feasibility study in 2009 to look at alternatives for renovations or a new pool. • The PROS plan process shows support for a new pool and aquatic facility. The next round of engagement will look at those options. • Mentions they are looking at indoor vs. outdoor facilities and the big price tag attached. • Looking at ways to keep the current pool operational. Shannon Burley: Mentions the $175,000 project is very specific and it's rather large. The $450,000 programmed for other projects that would be used if something broke down or needed repair. Angie Feser: Mentions needing $10,000 to $15,000 a year to fix the pool. This is part of the citywide improvement funds to account for the uncertainty. Mentions the marsh property has a long history. • Half the area is owned by Chevron and was going to be sold to WSDOT for the future ferry landing. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 15 Packet Pg. 305 8.2.e • WSDOT has decided not to use that land for a new ferry landing. • The site is in the process of clean up from oil contamination. • It can't be turned over to WSDOT until the Dept. of Ecology deems it clean enough. • The City will have right of first refusal if it is available for sale. • Asks Rob English if he has anything to add. (He does not) • Mentions there's associated with the Willow Creek and Shelleberger Creek project, but they can't really design it if they don't own it. Richard Kuehn: Asks about the process to make upgrades at the parks. What is the process to choose these upgrades? Angie Feser: States that it is part of the PROS Plan. • It's going to help identify community priorities and reallocate resources. • Some of it is age, safety, and ensuring equitable distribution across the city. • Mentions the PROS Plan will help represent the entire community rather than focus the improvements in one area. Richard Kuehn: Mentions that Spokane has done a great job with community engagement and inclusivity with their parks. Talks about signage emphasizing people making comments on preferences. Angie Feser: Mentions that Spokane is her hometown and remembers the ' 74 Expo at Riverfront Park. Is familiar with the whole project. Matt Cheung: Enjoys these parks conversations because it is big draws for Edmonds. Asks about hearing that there are $100,000 for repairs this year but then $400,000 after. Would like to know the reason. Angie Feser: Mentions a lot of the current funding is going into a project downtown. • Talks about the small team to do park planning. • Involves identifying future projects, prioritizing them, getting bid documents ready, and have them ready. • They hope to have a dedicated park planner in next year's budget. • Sees 2023 the timeframe they'll have the resources in place to utilize that extra funding on projects. Matt Cheung: Asks if they consider engaging the volunteers to assist with parks? Shannon Burley: Mentions they rely on the community to help us maintain the City's parks. Pre- COVID, they averaged 30 volunteer projects a year at parks. Chair Rosen: Asks about the 4th Avenue corridor. Understands that there is no money but asks what it would take to get that moving. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 306 8.2.e Angie Feser: Mentions the challenge is funding and that the next phase to finish the design. Believes it has an $8 million estimate to do the work. States they need to finish the design, get construction documents, get a bid, then comes construction. States that it is very specific and grant funding is challenging, it isn't really eligible for transportation or park grants. Asks Shannon to confirm the current design level, 60% or 30%. Shannon: Believes it is at 30% design. The goal was to try and secure economic development type grants for the project. Mentions the challenge of using utility funds because, after opening the street, there were few utilities there. Chair Rosen: Asks about the Missing Link. It has a date and is expressed as Plan A and Plan B. Asks about the confidence level that this is a reasonable amount of time to resolve this. Angie Feser: Believes this is correct. Mentions the has had a legal component and was paused because of COVID related reasons. States that it is back on the schedule for next year. Chair Rosen: Asks about the beautification projects that have uniform numbers spread out over the years. How is that flat number assessed, given inflation? Angie Feser: Mentions it is generally a place holder and it comes down to sponsorships. There have been more baskets created at corner parks and are part of the new landscaping needed for street improvement projects. Mentions they should probably look at increasing resources and funding because there has been more demand. Provides an example of the roundabout at Five Corners, it requires a significant amount of maintenance. Chair Rosen: Asks why the greenhouse was removed from this year's list. Mentions that it was important during last year's CFP because it was failing Angie Feser: Mentions they've been working on, but it needs a variance. They're not sure if they can get it down and rebuilt in time for next year after getting the variance approval. There are also issues with the bids. This will probably carry forward to next year's budget. Chair Rosen: Thanks Rob, Angie, and Shannon and asks them to pass the thanks along to the people they work with. Says the work shown tonight is a testimony to all the things that they do. Angie Feser: Talks about how she brought forward this new format for the CIP and how Parks and Public Works worked together. Mentions the work of Rob English and the many hours Shannon put in. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 307 8.2.e Robert English: Says he'll pass along the comments to his staff and appreciates it. He's very proud of what they can do with the limited they have. Roger Pence: Asks about the sign on SR 104. Saw a little movement a couple of months ago then it stopped. Angie Feser: States the project started on September 13th. Everything was started then they found a sewer line where the sign would be. That requires a redesign and relocation of the sign and other components. The sign company is scheduled for September 25th. Judi Gladstone: Asks if private funding is ever considered. Angie Feser: Mentions they work with a lot of donations and grants. Have a policy that organizations paying more than half the price of the improvement can have it named. Lists several of the companies and organizations they've worked with. Chair Rosen: Asks for any other comments. (none) Will be ready for the public hearing at the next meeting. New Business — Code Amendment to update Residential Occupancy Standards. Chair Rosen: Introduces Eric to discuss the next item. Eric Engmann: Offers to move the Residential Occupancy Code Amendment introduction to the next meeting. Mentions that there has already been a lot of information shared tonight. Leaves it up to the Board to make the decision to move it. Chair Rosen: Asks if the Board has a preference. Judi Gladstone: Appreciates the offer and would entertain the postponement, given the hour Matt Cheung: Mentions the next meeting contains a public hearing and two code amendments. Asks how long that meeting is estimated to take. If two hours, then it makes sense to add this onto that agenda. Eric Engmann: States that moving the Residential Occupancy slides to the next meeting won't take much extra time. Chair Rosen: Agrees to move it to the next agenda. Extended Agenda Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 308 8.2.e Chair Rosen: Mentions the extended agenda was sent out separately. Asks if anyone has any questions. Roger Pence: Mentions the upcoming public hearing on the CFP/CIP. Feels the notice in the Everett Herald will only be read by a few people. Would like much more information shared on upcoming public hearings. Chair Rosen: Asks staff to be as aggressive as possible in informing the public. • Suggests using social media platforms to spread the word. • Talks about the Board being proactive, such as writing letters to the editor. • Reiterates the role of the city in making the public as engages as possible. Roger Pence: Says that a press release should be sent to the Beacon and My Edmonds News and the Herald and that there is a PIO to help. Rob Chave: Mentions all agendas are sent to the newspapers. Roger Pence: Says that the public hearing is only one element of that agenda. Unless the public hearing is highlighted, we're depending on them to read the whole thing to find that one item. States that should do better. Vice Chair Crank: Reiterates that, just because it is sent, it doesn't mean they're going to publish it. Asks to make sure that the Board is not putting all the onus on whether or not it is in the paper because many times, they just don't run it. Rob Chaves: Confirms staff can't predict what the paper will run. Judi Gladstone: Mentions that the extended agenda seems packed. Asks staff to be aware of trying to put too much into one meeting so that everything can get proper attention. Matt Cheung: Mentions the PROS Plan is on there twice. Angie Feser: States there will only be one discussion in the upcoming meetings. But there will be a department update too. They can be flexible with the schedule. Rob Chave: Will coordinate with Angie and Rob about how much time they will need and reassess the schedule. Comments for the Good of the Order Chair Rosen: Asks for comments for the good of the order. Eric Engmann: Mentions the web link for the new code update page. People can go to www.edmondswa.gov/codeupdates. Asks the Board to look and provide feedback. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 309 8.2.e Rob Chave: Mentions City Council approved a contract for the new Development Services director, who starts on November 16th. Chair Rosen: Asks for any other comments from staff or the Board. (none) Offers a couple of updates. • There is an opening on the Planning Board — help spread the word. • The Board received an application for student participant. The Chair and vice chair will meet with her, then possibly forward the nomination to the group. • Community meeting this Saturday (10/16) at 1 pm to participate in the process of creating future parks. • The Department of Corrections is looking to expand their work release program in Snohomish County. Nine potential sites have been identified and all but one has fallen through. The site in Mountain Lake Terrace but borders Edmonds. They are not moving forward at this point, just feasibility. Adjournment The Board meeting was adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Planning Board Minutes October 13, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 310 8.2.f CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Virtual Meeting Via Zoom October 27, 2021 Chair Rosen called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Mike Rosen, Chair Alicia Crank, Vice Chair Richard Kuehn Judi Gladstone Matt Cheung Todd Cloutier BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Roger Pence (excused) STAFF PRESENT Eric Engmann, Planning Division Rob Chave, Planning Division Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Robert English, Public Works Chair Rosen: Calls the meeting to order. Matt Cheung: Reads Land Acknowledgement. Eric Engmann: Does roll call. Present: Rosen, Crank, Cloutier, Kuehn, Gladstone, Cheung. Excused Absence: Pence. Mentions that the last meeting was supposed to be the last for Nathan Monroe Approval of Minutes Chair Rosen: Mentions there are no minutes to approve. Packet Pg. 311 8.2.f Announcement of the Agenda Chair Rosen: Discusses the agenda. There is a public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. There are also two new business items: • Introducing the code amendment to update residential occupancy standards. • Discussion of a possible student representative to the Board. Audience Comments Chair Rosen: Introduced audience comments and asks if anyone wishing to speak. Eric Engmann: States Natalie Seitz is in the audience Natalie Seitz: Will be providing comments during the public hearing on the budget. • Mentioned Council delayed the CIP and CFP presentation to receive feedback from tonight's public hearing. • Feels it is good planning practice for Council to take up issues after Planning Board review. The Council Member also helped alert residents to the public hearing. • Thanked the Planning Board for having the Buildable Lands report. • Mentions the City will likely seek to focus density along the SR 99 Corridor. • Talks about finding ways to reimagine how the City allocate resources and about who benefits from the tax dollars. • Would like the Planning Board to think about equity and displacement, especially along the SR 99 corridor. (No other public comment) d Public Hearing - Proposed 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) M L Chair Rosen: Introduces the public hearing item. Parks Portion of the CFP/CIP Presentation. Angie Feser: Mentions that Parks will present first to allow Rob English time to attend. Introduces herself and Shannon Burley. Lists Several Highlights of the 2022-2027 CIP/CFP Mentions they are currently working on two significant projects in the Department. o The 2022 PROS Plan, which is slated for a February 2022 completion. o Also working on completing the Civic Park Project. Used the past year to work on a Deferred Maintenance/Capital Replacement Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 2 Packet Pg. 312 8.2.f Program • Preparing for Future Large Projects (Land Acquisition, Marsh Restoration, Marina Beach Park, and PROS Plan Priorities) Deferred Maintenance/Capital Replacement Program • This is an inventory of the status of the Parks system. • There is a lot of deferred maintenance, they are focusing safety projects or playgrounds. • The pool also requires a lot of attention • There are infrastructure projects like the surfaces of parking lots, trails, and courts. • These need to be identified and mapped out for deferred maintenance and future upkeep. 2022-2027 Parks CIP/CFP Highlights • Based on 2016 PROS Plan Goals • Notes the 2022 PROS is underway and will have a brand-new CIP/CFP in the PROS Plan. • Mentions this CIP/CFP plan is more of a placeholder, it will change with after the PROS adoption. • Talks about the Parks Project List, it helps identify and prioritize deferred maintenance and small capital projects. • These projects are usually done by parks maintenance team but will be looking at contracting out some of these projects due increasing complexities. • Mentions the CIP is important for grant eligibility. Projects need to be on the CIP to be eligible for many grants. • Mentions there are some projects that don't have a dollar amount associated with them and are pushed out. The purpose for showing them is long-term planning. 2022- 2027 Parks CIP/CFP Project Distribution • Discusses the map of 13 park projects and their geographic distribution. Some are citywide so they aren't shown on the map. Acknowledges that there are a lot of resources spend in the bowl area. Will hope to address that better in the PROS Plan. Parks 2021-2027 CIP- New Format • Shows that the items are now project based rather than funding based. • The projects closer to 2022 are part of the Decision Package Process and discusses the Council Budget Process. • There are nine true capital projects, the four in the CIP programs are more general. • Mentions the new CIP identified the revenue sources and funding allocation through the six years. Discusses the CIP Funding Sources • There are no general fund monies for their CIP. • REET 2 funds represent 40% and unsecured grants are about 30% of funds Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 3 Packet Pg. 313 8.2.f • Mentions the new tree fund that is tied to land acquisition. • There are a couple of other sources; donations, bonds, secured grants, and unsecured grants. • The bottom of the sheet shows the "cashflow" of the program. The beginning fund balance of each year plus the revenue minus the expenditures then have ending fund balance. Civic Center Playfield • Multi -year project to renovate the eight acre downtown civic park. • Started in August 2021 and slated for completion in Winter 2022. • $13.7 million overall budget with a 2022 allocation of $9.7 million. • Mentions there are many revenue sources for this project. Marina Beach Part Improvements • A renovation to better serve the community. • Accommodates the new alignment for Willow Creek. • Includes a new parking lot configuration, overlooks, permanent restrooms, upgraded play area, improved ADA access, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges that go over Willow Creek, and a new personal watercraft launching area. • Retaining the existing beach and driftwood area as well as the off -leash dog area. • Going to provide a lot of environmental education opportunities in this park with Willow Creek. • Daylighting Willow creek will result in the removal of 1,600 linear feet of pipe. • Creates an exchange between Puget Sound and the estuary. • Secured about $1 million in grants from RCO. • The total six -year cost is close to $6 million. • Only the daylighting of Willow Creek is eligible for Salmon funding, the others must come from other funding sources. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor • Includes improvements along 4t' Avenue from Main Street to Edmonds Center for the Arts. • The final design phase is needed to construct pedestrian friendly and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way that provides a strong visual connection. • Priority in the State -Certified Creative District and the City's 2014 Community Cultural Plan. • Funding is estimated at $8 million but hasn't yet been secured. Playground Upgrade Program • City maintains 15 playgrounds and only 2 of them are fully inclusive. • This process will include regularly scheduled updates to playgrounds, many are more than 35 years old. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 4 Packet Pg. 314 8.2.f • Apart of the Mayor's initiative is to not just meet ADA, but to have inclusive level design. • There will be an annual allocation of $175,000 to upgrade playgrounds, mainly from REET funding. Yost Pool Repair • Was built 50 years ago and still provides a great opportunity for healthy lifestyles • Needs to have its plaster lining replaces as part of a 10-year routine maintenance. • Slated for $175,000 from REET and will do work in April. Waterfront Walkway Completion- Ebb Tide Section • Mentions that it is known as the Missing Link. • It's the key piece in a mile that connects Brackets Landing North down to Marina Beach Park. • Would provide continuous ADA access. • This section of walkway would be constructed within the city owned easement. • The walkway in front of the condos, the easement, and the design are currently under legal review. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration • Would reconnect Puget Sound with the marsh and restore the natural tidal exchange. • Also related to the proposed Marina Beach Park project, where Willow Creek comes in underneath the railroad. • Supported by 2016 PROS Plan. • Supports salmon recovery and habitat along with improved water quality. • Helps to address sea level rise impacts. • Is an opportunity for recreation tourism and environmental educational. • This project is listed here because it might be in Park's CIP program, but there is no current park funding. • Mentions funding has been earmarked in the Public Works CIP. • States it is a city project, not just a Public Works or Parks project, and will require many funding sources and staff from all departments to make it happen. Community Park and Athletic Complex Phase 2 (CFP Only) • Doesn't have dollars allocated but has tremendous potential for grant funding. • Former Woodway High School and really two projects, one adds lighting to the Phase 1 improvements and the second is creating a multi -sport athletic field to increase usage. • Serves a densely populated area of 150,000 residents within a 5-mile radius. • First phase was completed in 2015 for about $4 million. • Estimates for Phase 2 are about $6 to $8 million. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 5 Packet Pg. 315 8.2.f Parks and Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) • Major renovation or needs replacement. • Funding has not been identified. • It is undersized for the work being done there (mower repair, welding flower baskets, etc.) Also has a locker room, a meeting room, and is the only office space for the park's lead. Citywide Park Improvements/ Capital Replacement Program • Adjusted the CIP to have one fund for all citywide park improvements. • Discusses the Deferred Maintenance Program and how it combines all the small projects into one lump sum rather than identifying each project. • Also covers emergency projects that pop up. • This is important to identify insufficiently maintained park and reduce higher maintenance costs down the road. • Delayed maintenance can increase the City's liability. • It helps achieve PROS Plan Goal 7, which is to provide a high quality and efficient level of maintenance service for all parks and facilities. Beautification Program • It has an annual budget of $21,000 and support irrigation and mulch many areas of the city. • The program is highly supported by volunteers. • Additional funding is supplied by the Basket and Corner Parks sponsorship, which contributes about $19,000 per year. Park and Open Space Acquisition Program o • Based on community priorities for open space conservation. a. • The City is working on a few acquisitions, but they are still confidential until the approval of purchase. • Allocation of about $700,000 reserved through 2021 REET funding. • Tree code funds will also help with this. Estimates are about $200,000 a year from a fee -in -lieu and fines. Finishes the presentation and thanks the Board. Public Works Portion of the CFP/CIP Presentation. Robert English: Introduces himself and provides some background. • Discusses changes to the CFP and CIP Document. • Mentions the CFP and CIP first three years are projects that have secured or reasonably expected funding. Next three years have projects that are important but don't have secure funding yet. • Also mentions they followed up on the lighting for the Westgate intersection and found one light was out and an opportunity to add a light at the SE corner. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 6 Packet Pg. 316 8.2.f 2022 Preservation Projects • In 2022, there is $1.5 million programmed for the pavement preservation program. • Paves six lane miles of city streets and replace ten ADA ramps. • Discusses the joint project with the City of Lynnwood on 76th Avenue between 196tb Street to Olympic View to overlay 2.8 lane miles and 15 new ADA ramps. • Will close out 84th Ave Overlay Project. 2022 Safety and Capacity Projects • A big focus is on the Highway 99 Corridor. The Highway 99 revitalization and gateway project are in the design phase. Going into construction in 2022. That's why the program amount is $7.6 million. It's a safety project to minimize the accidents occurring from that two-way left turn lane. • Also adds a hawk signal for pedestrian crossing just north of 2341h Street and gateway signage at either end of the city limits. • Will have a public meeting on November 171h to discuss the signage. • Stages 3 and 4, are going into the design phase in 2022. Stage 3 is the very southern segment between 244th Street up to 2381h Street. Stage 4, the portion between 224th and 2201h Street, received a federal grant to begin the State 4 design phase. • Another project in design is the 76th/220th intersection improvements. That will continue into 2022. • Another project is the State Route 104 adoptive system. This will coordinate five traffic signals along State Route 104 to improve the timing and coordination of the signal system. A federal grant is funding a large portion of that project • The other two programs replace guard rails and make traffic signal upgrades. 2022 Active Transportation Projects and Planning a • The citywide bicycle improvements project is another project to build bike lanes d and will go to construction in 2022. • The Elm Way Walkway will install about 700 feet of sidewalk between 81h and 9th 2 Avenue and cost over $900,000. L • The Transportation Plan update for $185,000 and start in 2022. o • Traffic calming program to help reduce speeding on qualifying streets. ti • Pedestrian safety programs include rectangular rapid flashing beacon signs with c flashing lights to cross busy streets. • The citywide pedestrian improvement project will install hawk signals on SR 104. a 2022 Water Utility • $2.1 million for replacement program to replace pipe. Will start design for the 2023 program. The design phase takes place the year before the construction phase. • Assessing the Yost and Seaview reservoirs to evaluate maintenance needs. • The Waterline Overlays Program overlays streets that have been cut for pipe replacement and the patched. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 7 Packet Pg. 317 8.2.f 2022 Stormwater Utility • The first two replace old, deteriorated pipe or undersized pipe within the city. $1.45 million set for this program in 2022 for over 2,000 feet of pipe replacement. • The Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements is to improve catch basins that collect runoff from SR 104 and treat the water before it is discharged in the marsh. • The Perrinville Creek Basin projects, three are planned within the basin. The first one is a flow management project, mostly rain gardens to keep runoff out of Perrinville and reduce some of those peak storm water flows within the creek. • Lower Perrinville Creek restoration to install a culvert from Talbot Cove. • Seaview Park Infiltration Phase 2. The purpose is to take some of that runoff out of the Perrinville Creek system. Phase 1 was built a couple of years ago. Will go into construction in 2022. 75% is funded by a DOE grant. • Lake Ballinger Regional Facility for $300,000 will continue with design. That's an infiltration facility to reduce the flows into Lake Ballinger. • Green street and rain gardens. The primary source of funding was related to COVID. It allows opportunities for bioretention and rain gardens and to try to take care of the storm water runoff and water quality. • Storm water overlays are used to overlay streets that have been cut and patched by the replacement program. • Going to have the storm and surface water comprehensive plan update starting in 2022. 2022 Sewer Utility • A replacement program for $1.6 Million to replace 2,300 linear feet of pipe. • Also have the pipe rehabilitation program, where we rehabilitate the pipe from the inside. • We have the sewer line overlays that is like the other two programs. a d 2022 Wastewater Treatment Plant • Carbon Recovery Project down SR 104 to do carbon recovery. • City Park Odor Scrubber for 2022 as well. 2 0 Public Works and Utilities - Facilities • The current CIP shows the investment is needed for each facility. • Identifies nine projects in the budget for facility repair and maintenance. • A large source of the funding comes from a City Council approved bond that was approved this year for $4.4 million. Public Comment on the CFP/CIP. Chair Rosen: Thanks Rob, Angie, and Shannon for work and for the presentation. Notes there are 126 projects for 2022 ranging from $455 to $9.7 million. Mentions public comment will come first to help inform the Board's comments and questions. Mentions the Board received letters from Rob Eber and Bernie Busch. Opens the public Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 8 Packet Pg. 318 8.2.f comment. Eric Engmann: Recognizes Jim Ogonowski. Jim Ogonowski: Mentions he has a few comments to add to the discussion. • States that the Mayor's budget message says that the budget reflects the values of the city. States he isn't clear about where these values or vision is written. • Says he isn't clear how the city prioritizes its distribution of the budget and finds it difficult to understand how these programs and projects are prioritized. • Finds it difficult to determine how funds are allocated because the CIP/CFP doesn't have an overall summary. • Mentions he recalls that Perrinville Creek flooding was presented to Council as a near emergency, but the budget doesn't reflect that. States that there is a disconnect between the need and funding for this project. • Mentions the Parks Budget doesn't include any projects for the Uptown area. • Discusses the high price for over $1.25 million for 100 feet of boardwalk along the waterfront. • Mentions that Parks wants to expend over $3 million from the balance reserve, which takes of 70% of the reserve. Discusses inflation and fiscal responsibility. • Doesn't believe this can be moved to City Council as is because of the complexity of this budget. Natalie Seitz: States she is still reviewing the budge but has identified several concerns so far. • Asks for increased land acquisition funding for areas that are underserved with parks and open space resources. States funding in well -resources areas should be reduced or delayed to focus resources where they are most needed. Provides examples of the $10 million for downtown beautification and $8 million for the 4t' Ave cultural corridor. • Asks that several of these projects be delayed to fund an auxiliary city office on SR 99 that the Mayor identified in his annual address. • Asks that the sidewalk improvement in PWT 50 be connected to Mathay-Ballinger Park. Mentions there are currently no sidewalks to this park. Connecting the sidewalk from the park up to 406 would provide a connection between the park and a daycare. • Consider park mitigation funding with PWD 06 & 07 because Mathay-Ballinger is the only park that serves the SR 99 Correction / Uptown Area. Closing the park for the summer construction season are significant impacts. The city should also consider providing a bathroom during the summer to improve water quality and provide a recreational resource. • Discusses the $1.5 million proposed for downtown lighting in PWT 44 and why additional lights can't be added to existing utility poles. The lighting could be used for areas with higher needs. • PWT 32 should be prioritized sooner. This is the location of the Uptown market, and the city should make safe pedestrian here a priority like they do for farmers Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 9 Packet Pg. 319 8.2.f markets in the bowl. • PWT 26 & 43 should be combined and developed concurrently in the 2025-2026 timeframe. Mentions the Inner Urban Trail is recognized as a regional resource, which far exceeds the bike use of what the City has chosen to do. • The funds for PWT 08, rain gardens, should to a right-of-way tree planting program. Mentions rain gardens are a maintenance burden. • Facilities like PDF 01 & 05, Boys and Girls Club and Francis Anderson Cultural and Leisure Center, have no benefit identified in the plan. This is over $1 million with no listed benefit, this should be disclosed or cut if there isn't a benefit. • Discusses the need to move resources from the Bowl to areas like the SR 99 corridor for equitable distribution to those most in need. • Asks to amend the budget, as outlined, so all communities receive proportional investment from the City. Eric Engmann: Mentions Joe Scordino wishes to speak. Joe Scordino: States the Edmonds Marsh should be taken out of the stormwater CIP. • Mentions Public Works didn't present page 73 of the CFP/CIP document • States that marshes aren't storm basins but an estuary and wildlife reserve. • Asks the Planning Board to recommend that City Council delete page 73 of the Public Works CFP/CIP and leave the Marsh Restoration on Page 12 of the Parks CFP/CIP, because that is where it belongs. • Should be restored under an Ecological not Stormwater umbrella. • Discusses how the Save Our March group talked about this last year and provides some history on the ecological issues of this action. Chair Rosen: Asks if there are any other people wishing to speak. (none) a U) d Closes the Public Comment on the CFP/CIP. c Chair Rosen: Thanks those who wrote in and spoke about this important issue. L Asks staff how Council will be informed about the public comment and discussion N from this meeting and the last. Mentions the minutes from these meeting won't N likely be available. d Robert English: Discusses the minutes and the upcoming process. • Any action taken by the Planning Board will be added to the agenda packet. • Next Monday at Council will be the Public Hearing. • States that last Monday's Council hearing was just the initial presentation, like the last Planning Board meeting. • They will attach the minutes when they are available. • There's no action set for the (upcoming) Monday night Council meeting. • The adoption at Council is scheduled for December 14tb Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 10 Packet Pg. 320 8.2.f Angie Feser: Reviews the upcoming schedule. • Monday evening Public Hearing for the CFP/CIP on November 1 St • Council deliberation for budget scheduled for November 9tb • Adoption is scheduled for December 14tb • Quite a bit of time before the planned capital budget. Chair Rosen: Encourages the Board to point out specific recommendations for consensus to be sent to Council. Board Questions and Comments Chair Rosen: Asks for any questions from the Board. Vice Chair Crank: Mentions she also watched the Council meeting last night and it went too late to get feedback. Asks if there are any projects coming up that aren't centered around the Bowl, things like pocket parks or other projects for other areas. Angie Feser: Acknowledges that Mathay-Ballinger Park needs improvement and has great o potential. N • Provides example of adding a port -a -potty there as to how Parks is listening. c • The Inter Urban Trail needs a lot of attention. • Mentions opportunities to work with Montlake Terrace to discuss shared c improvements at Lake Ballinger Park for shared improvements. c • Also discusses land acquisition about potential properties along 99 over the past a year. • Mentions the PROS Plan will focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion 3 • This will shift the goals and the Capital Plan in the PROS Plan. g • The PROS Plan will come to the Board in the next few months and that will help shift the focus. o Vice Chair Crank: Asks how grant funding is looking for some of these projects. Also interested to see if changes in priorities from grantors because of COVID; is it tougher or easier. Angie Feser: Has noticed that grants criteria is shifting to look at communities that are underserved. Grants are requiring census tract data to tie park funding to areas of greater need, like Highway 99 and South Edmonds. Hasn't seen direct correlation between funding and COVID. COVID magnified the need inequalities for access to parks and open space facilities. Vice Chair Crank: Wants to look at the Marsh Project pragmatically. Asks why Marsh Restoration Project should be kept under the Stormwater CFP/CIP instead of Parks. Asks if it Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 11 Packet Pg. 321 8.2.f has to do with grant funding. Angie Feser: States the biggest reason is that the Marsh Project is huge. • $17 for improvements and $3-5 million for acquisitions. • Will need to look at all sources of funding (park, stormwater, salmon, bird habitat, etc.,) States that it has to pull off that project so it shouldn't come from one category. • Mentions Public Works has money allocated up to the edge of the marsh. • Discusses how stormwater improvements affect the marsh. • Shown in both CIPs so it can secure Parks or Stormwater grants. Vice Chair Crank: Asks if it altered by where it lives. If it was moved (to just Parks), would it impact the other fund? Angie Feser: Talks about the multiple sources of funds needed. • Mentions that many grants need 50% matching funds from the City, and it doesn't matter where the source of that funding comes from (general fund, stormwater, etc.) Robert English: States there is definitely a stormwater component of the project. • Willow Creeks and stormwater runs into it. • Will need multiple grant funds to support the project and based on the merits of the project. Mentions the matching funds needed. • Talked about water quality projects for the catch basins along SR 104. • It is a citywide project and lives in both documents. Vice Chair Crank: Says she will leave it there and let others ask questions. Judi Gladstone: Would like more clarification on the stormwater and park funds for the Marsh. Asks if it is in both budgets. Angie Feser: States that it is listed in the Parks CFP/CIP, but there is no funding allocated. L Judi Gladstone: Asks if the funding in the Stormwater budget is just for the stormwater runoff from N SR 104 or is it for more that that. ti Robert English: PWD 2 is the Edmonds Marsh Willow Creek daylighting project. • There are no funds in 2022 for the marsh itself. • Mentions the catch basin that Judi referenced has 75% grant funding from the Department of Ecology and there are also funds from the City Council. Judi Gladstone: Talks about the importance of nexus between the work and the utility. • States that, from her experience in Utilities, they should be careful so that the utility doesn't pick up costs that aren't really utility costs. • Mentions from her experience in Utilities, it really matters what funds are being Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 12 Packet Pg. 322 8.2.f used. Angie Feser: Mentions all grants are rated based on the merit of the project. • For the Marsh Project, some of that is Parks habitat restoration and some is Stormwater. • States that's why it needs to live in different places. • That's the City's way of breaking it into chunks to go get separate grants. • Talks about the difference needs between Parks and Stormwater for the marsh grant. Judi Gladstone: Asks if the current PROS Plan has gone through any equity analysis. Angie Feser: States the 2016 PROS Plan was a light update and there wasn't equity analysis. Judi Gladstone: Talks about the sidewalk project schedule. • Mentions they talked last meeting about some lowered ranked projects shown earlier in the CFP/CIP. • Asks if there is some fluidity to move those funding sources to shift some funding from projects in the Bowl to other areas that are underserved. Robert English: Talks about the challenge with moving grant funds. • Mentions local funds are more fluid, like REET or general funds. • The challenge is the grants and talks about the competition for receiving them. • The project has to be a good scoring project. • Mentions project B might be picked over project A because it fits the criteria better Judi Gladstone: Asks where the grants for these projects come from. Robert English: Mentions they come from different sources. • There are federal and state sources for funds for sidewalks. • Mentions the State Transpiration Improvement Board and the WSDOT Bike Ped Program. Richard Kuehn: Asks about Perrinville Project. • Given the growth, believes many of the issues are coming from Lynnwood. • Asks about the conversations and collaborations with the City of Lynnwood to help with this problem. Robert English: Talks about the discussion with Lynnwood. • There have been some preliminary discussions. • Mentions the code changes for stormwater reviews and regulations that went to Council last month. Are proposing tighter restrictions on development in the Perrinville Creek basin. • Will be talking with Lynnwood about adopting similar regulations in their portion Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 13 Packet Pg. 323 8.2.f of the Perrinville Basin. • Will also have larger discussions issue of their runoff impacting the lower portion of Perrinville Creek. Richard Kuehn: Asks about how these discussions are initiated. Will the public and the Board be involved in these discussions? Robert English: Mentions the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan will be starting in 2022. That will be an opportunity for the Planning Board to have this discussion on a citywide basis. Mentions the Lower Perrinville Creek design in 2022 to help with the outfall. This will have Lynnwood involved. Richard Kuehn: Asks about the process to transfer funds for those projects that aren't grant funding and can be moved. How big of an undertaking is that? Robert English: Discusses how the sidewalk priorities come from the existing Transportation Plan. • Talks about that process: went to Planning Board and approve by City Council. • That's the list used by Public Works. • Mentions the new Transpiration Plan is starting in 2022 to reevaluate the list. • This will be the opportunity for discussion and setting the priority for the next six years. Angie Feser: Mentions that the current funds for the marsh are utility funds and they can't be c moved to parks funding. 13 Talks about how the Marina Beach Park project relates to the marsh restoration. N • When people think about the marsh, they think of the part east of the railroad tracks. c • States that the Marina Beach Park project is a huge bookend for the restoration of a the marsh. • Willow creek is in a pipe below that park and without the Marina Beach Park, Willow Creek can't flow into the marsh. • Talks about the complexities of the piping below the railroad that tie into both the Marina Beach Park and Marsh Restoration projects. o • Talks about the $1 million grant for the Marina Beach Park and that portion often N gets overshadowed in the marsh restoration discussion. N Shannon Burley: Talks about the prior and new PROS Plan. • Mentions the previous PROS Plan was done with a lot of public input. • These parks projects were identified in a planning document that is now ending. • Mentions the new PROS Plans will use an important equity lens and lead to a new list of projects in the Parks CIP. • These priorities are usually moved around in these planning processes. Chair Rosen: Asks if leaving the marsh project in stormwater leaves money on the table. Robert English: States that he doesn't agree with that if money on the table means grant funding, Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 14 Packet Pg. 324 8.2.f The grants are based on the merit and scoring of the project. Chair Rosen: Talks about the Board needing to respond in a definitive way if they want a change or recommendation to the Council. Vice Chair Crank: Talks about her recommendation for an educational component on grant funding. • Believes staff recommendation is to move this forward as a whole package unless there is a specific issue. • Talk about the comments made in the public hearing, reading the letters, and listening at other meetings. • Mentions that part of the discussion is looking at what will be upcoming. • Mentions that she feels that there is an educational issue missing and people don't necessarily understand the funding and grant process. • Recommends a caveat that staff do their best in explaining the funding aspect to this and why certain things live where they do. Chair Rosen: States that he feels that the Boards role is to give any advice that they have, not just looking at the entire package. Talks about the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor. • Mentions the discussion with Angie at the last meeting. • When asked why it was shown late in the CIP schedule, it was because there was no money available. • Mentions that moving it up in the schedule adds emphasis and a sense of urgency to seek funding opportunities for it. Talks about the potential for a city satellite office on Highway 99 area. a • Mentions the $1 million for making the existing city hall more functional. d • Wonders it be better to start that conversation about moving city office locations M c now rather than investing more money into the current location. M Angie Feser: Talks about the discussion for a Highway 99 city office. o • Mentions it is a priority of the Mayor to have a presence on Highway 99. N • Been working on finding a physical space for that this year. N • Talks about looking for empty office space or making a mobile unit. o • Had a Director discussion on Tuesday about staffing this. a • Mentions the Board could make it a recommendation to add it to CIP list, if they co want. Judi Gladstone: Has some comments and questions. • Mentions the excitement and difficulty with closing out a previous planning effort and opening a new one. • Asks if the city looking ahead to replacing other culverts in the Willow Creek area because of legal actions occurring at the state level that can become local issues. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 15 Packet Pg. 325 8.2.f • Asks if there is any money set aside to deal with pollutants coming from highways, specifically in the Highway 99 area. Is the City looking at rain gardens or bioswales to have the stormwater drain into it to help with pollution? Robert English: Mentions they don't have a comprehensive evaluation for culverts, but it may look at in Stormwater Comprehensive Plan update. Mentions that there are a few select locations, like Perrinville Creek, but not a comprehensive assessment. Mentions stormwater improvements will be a part of the Highway 99 project and provides some examples. Also talks about connection with Lake Ballinger project to further address the issue with stormwater runoff. (Some general discussion between Judi Gladstone and Robert English about general treatment techniques for multiple locations) Chair Rosen: Discusses a need for a vision of Edmonds. • Mentions it is difficult to have a clear understanding of how all these major city components that are moving forward independently (housing, trees, parks, etc.) fit together and are prioritized. • Believes a vision of Edmonds would help make big and day-to-day issues easier. • Recommends that the city wouldn't do another large process like this until a visioning process is added to the budget, to help prioritize all these things. Rob Chave: Talks about the visioning in the Comprehensive Plan. CN • Mentions the vision lives in the Comp Plan, which is currently being updated and ) will result in the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. c • Mentions this new vision will be a major component of the Comprehensive Plan a` update. d Chair Rosen: Would like to make this a recommendation to Council so that this message is heard. Richard Kuehn: Things al lot of what he's hearing being discussed from the public is about the o vision and values of Edmonds. Really likes this recommendation. r Judi Gladstone: Talks about the role of the Comp Plan in establishing the vision. • Cautious about having a vision document that is separate from the Comprehensive Plan. • States the Comprehensive Plan provides the structure to deal with the many different facets of the City. • Recommends emphasizing the vision process as part of the Comprehensive Plan process. Chair Rosen: Likes the clarity that Judi mentioned. States that the vision should lead the comprehensive planning process. Asks if the Board will feel comfortable sending Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 326 8.2.f that as a strong recommendation. Vice Chair Crank: Reiterates the caveat that she mentioned earlier about the educational component to explain why things live where they live from a financial aspect. Chair Rosen: States that he feels that the educational caveat should be a separate recommendation to have its own emphasis. Mentions there are two specific recommendations. Mentions that Eric has is sharing his screen to show a motion that would capture all of this. Eric Engmann: Mentions he was typing the recommendations as they were being expressed by the Board and has written three recommendations so far. • Not sure if Chair Rosen's comment about moving the 4th Avenue projects earlier in the Parks timeframe was an official recommendation or just a comment. Reads the draft motion to recommend the 2022-2027 CFP and CIP to City Council with the 3 recommendations. • Vice Chair Crank's recommendation, that staff do their best to explain the funding aspect of the CFP to the public and explain why items are located where they are. • Chair Rosen's recommendation, that the City establish as formal Vision of Edmonds in order to help make both day-to-day and big decisions easier and help inform how capital projects are prioritized. • Chair Rosen's recommendation, to encourage moving the 4th Avenue project to an earlier timeframe in order to promote the importance of seeking funding and partnerships. Chair Rosen: States that the visioning process should be up front in the Comprehensive Planning y Process. To lead and guide it. Talks about adding values to the recommendation. c Restructures the recommendation to say, that the City should establish a formal process to establish values and a vision of Edmonds that would be a part of and lead o the Comprehensive Planning process. r Asks if anyone has any comments about the 4th Avenue recommendation. Judi Gladstone: Mentions that she wouldn't be supportive of the recommendation to move the 4th Avenue project to an earlier timeframe. States this could take staff time away from seeking funding for projects done in other parts of the city. Chair Rosen: States that they can delete that recommendation for now. Matt Cheung: Reads an audience comment that the Comp Plan is a strategic document and doesn't contain a strategic vision. How would you respond to that? Rob Chave: Talks about the goals listed in the Comp Plan. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 327 8.2.f Mentions that they will be doing a visioning process to help with the language used in the Comp Plan. The vision is embodied in the goals, objectives, and policies. Matt Cheung: Asks about the recommendation to explain funding of the CFP. Suggested that the Marsh project be specifically added to the recommendation because it has been the primary focus of the discussion. Judi Gladstone: Agrees with this suggestion because in this particular case that is where the interest lies and allows Council to focus on that. (The Board sates that they like this suggestion) Richard Kuehn: Also suggests they add language about the Marsh Project and other projects that impact multiple places of the city. Todd Cloutier: Clarifies that it isn't about places in the city but multiple components in the CFP. Matt Cheung: Suggests it reads, that staff do their best to explain the funding aspect of the CFP to the public and explain why items are located where they are, particularly the Marsh Project and other projects that incorporate multiple components of the CFP. Chair Rosen: Asks if there are any other changes or if they are ready to vote on the motion. N as Judi Gladstone: Has another recommendation to seek funding to move forward with those projects a that will be more equitable throughout the city. ° IL Chair Rosen: Asks if Judi means that those projects that increase equitability are a higher priority 2 or get to cut in line. Judi Gladstone: Talks about how the CFP/CIP is updated annually and realizes that the funding can 2 change. Mentions that that this will allow for a placeholder in the long-term T CFP/CIP schedule for those kinds of projects. ti Chair Rosen: Suggests it reads, seek opportunity to shift moneys or look for funding to move forward with projects... Judi Gladstone: Projects that advance equity throughout the City. Chair Rosen: Asks for any other comments or recommendations. (None) Mentions there is a motion and three recommendations. Asks for a new second. (Seconded) Eric Engmann: Asks for clarification if it should be called the Marsh Project, or something more Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 328 8.2.f specific. Angie Feser: Suggests calling it the Marsh Restoration Project. Chair Rosen: Asks for the members to vote. (all say aye or raise their hands) Motion to Recommend the 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to City Council with the following recommendations: 1. That staff do their best to explain the funding aspect of the CFP to the public and explain why items are located where they are, particularly the Marsh Restoration Project and other projects that incorporate multiple components of the CFP. 2. That the City should establish a formal process to establish values and a vision of Edmonds that would be as part of, and lead, the Comprehensive Planning process. 3. Seek opportunities to shift monies or look for funding to move forward with projects that advance equity throughout the City. Motion passes 6-0. (Discussion on whether the motion includes the overall recommendation. Clarifies that it was part of the motion.) Chair Rosen: Closes this part of the agenda and thanks Rob, Angie, and Shannon. New Item- Code Amendment to Update Residential Occupancy Standards Chair Rosen: Asks Eric Engmann to introduce the item. Eric Engmann: Walks through the presentation. • This will be a code update that affects residential occupancy standards in the City. • Mentions the topics will cover the Senate Bill that requires these changes, non- compliant city code sections, and some potential solutions. Discusses Residential Occupancy Limits in general. • Limits the number of unrelated people living in a dwelling. • Started with tenement laws in the late 19th century to protect overcrowding • Such a part of planning that our zoning categories are based on these terms: single- family and multifamily. • This is an issue because it doesn't address 21 st century living or what a family really looks like. • There have been plenty of case law that has slowly removed the ability to set these Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 329 8.2.f limits. Senate Bill (SB) 5235 • Bill passed by State in 2021 that prohibits cities from doing this with a few exceptions. • Cities can no longer regulate the number of unrelated persons occupying a home. • Cities often use this to limit other uses in residential zoning. Conflicting Edmonds Code Sections • The Edmonds definition for a family in ECDC 21.30.010 sets this limit to five unrelated persons living in a house. • Mentions many other definitions in the code are related to this family definition. Possible Solutions • Will remove these references per state law and look at other section that need updates • Will look for solutions to ensure single-family uses and zones are maintained. • Clarifies that the single-family zoning categories and uses will not be removed. Two Possible Approaches to the Updates • Highlights several options for new criteria • Includes limitations on the number of items that generally represent multifamily living, such as the number of mailboxes, gas meters, garbage collection areas, etc. • Can also include limitations on components of usage, such as having common access to living, sleeping, and cooking facilities. • Mentions that these are just options but not necessarily ones that staff will propose. • Staff is currently working with the legal team to ensure that the recommendations are well vetted. Rob Chave: Further clarifies that staff will be looking more toward measurable things rather than things like lease arrangements. Eric Engmann: Mentions staff will come back in about a month with draft recommendations. Also discusses the webpage on www.edmondswa.gov/codeupdates that covers this issue and allows people to sign up for notifications. Board Discussion on this Item. Chair Rosen: Opens it up to Board questions. Judi Gladstone: Asks what other places, not just locally, are doing to deal with this. Talks about the challenge with trying to regulate the many living arrangements in the single-family defined residences. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 330 8.2.f Eric Engmann: Mentions these limits are still used by the vast majority of the country. • Many cities that have looked at this, have done so to remove single-family zoning districts. • There are very few examples of things done between those two ideas. • Even with this new state law, most Washington cities haven't updated this code yet. Vice Chair Crank: Talks about her experience and some recommendations. • Would recommend having directed messages to renters and property owners that rent. • Mentions common area standards would be easier to include. • Discusses using limitations on things like mailboxes or water meters. • Talks about all of the 21 st century living arrangements that make this needed. Judi Gladstone: Mentions multigenerational households and how that will continue to grow Vice Chair Crank: Mentions single people with a mortgage that will rely on others living there to make those mortgage payments. Eric Engmann: Recommends that the Board start thinking about scenarios can be tested against the draft recommendations in the next session. New Item- Student Representative to the Planning Board N O N Chair Rosen: Introduces the next topic. • Mentions there was an application for student rep from Lily Distelhorst. n • Talks about her application and her desire to learn more about urban planning. o • The Chair and Vice Chair met with her. a d Rob Chave: Mentions Lily has been in the audience all night. 'c Vice Chair Crank: Says she had a great meeting with her and asks if she would like to talk. a 0 T Lily Distelhorst: Introduces herself. N ti • Currently a sophomore in high school. c • Looking at majoring in Urban Planning. m • Passionate about affordable housing and public transit. a Chair Rosen: Makes a motion that Lily become the student representative to the Board. (Motion and Seconded) Affirmation is unanimous. All welcome her to the Board. Chair Rosen: Mentions she will be getting a city email address and will receive the packet. She can't vote but will be a great voice to the conversation. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 21 Packet Pg. 331 8.2.f Extended Agenda Chair Rosen: Introduces the extended agenda. • Mentions the second meeting in November and December have been cancelled because of the proximity to the holidays. • The meeting next month will be about the PROS Plan Judi Gladstone: Asks about the timeline needed for the Residential Occupancy Standards. Does it have to be competed by a specific date? Eric Engmann: Mentions the law is in affect but there are no penalties for not having the code updated yet. The provisions in the code are no longer enforceable but there isn't a specific urgency, other than having the code reflect the current laws. Chair Rosen: Asks for any other comments on the extended agenda. (none) Comments for the Good of the Order Chair Rosen: Asks for comments for the good of the order. Eric Engmann: Has a few updated. • Apologizes for not having the last meeting minutes ready, they are very long. • Mentions staff has hired Laurie Hugdahl as the new minute taker to prepare future minutes. Provides a bit of her background. Staff is very excited. • Mentions staff worked with the PIO to announce tonight's Public Hearing on the City's Facebook page. Judi Gladstone: Commends the City's Utility staff for a recent tour of the City's raingardens. Vice Chair Crank: Working on the Airport Master Plan, so stay tuned. Chair Rosen: Talks about the public's frustration with the perceived lack of transparency and that their opinions aren't fully valued. • Can lead to a lack of trust. • Public engagement should be paramount. Mentions there is an opening on the Board and that people should keep an eye out for the announcement. Thanks the Board for their time and closes the meeting. Adjournment Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 22 Packet Pg. 332 8.2.f The Board meeting was adjourned at 10:02 p.m. IW Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 23 Packet Pg. 333 8.2.g From: English, Robert To: Hall, Svdney Subject: FW: Review of Public Works and Parks CIPs Date: Thursday, October 28, 2021 2:24:44 PM From: Martin, Michelle <Michelle.Martin @edmondswa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:25 PM To: Martin, Michelle <Michelle.Martin @edmondswa.gov> Cc: Feser, Angie <Angie.Feser@edmondswa.gov>; English, Robert <Robert.English @edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: Review of Public Works and Parks CIPs Greetings Planning Board, Forwarding comment letter received today from Ron Eber for your reference. Bcc: PB members list 7-c06irk! IMicl cllc M'Irtivl City of Edmonds Planning Workgroup 425-771-0222 (Direct) From: Ron Eber <ronaldeberCcDcomcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 11:01 AM To: Planning <Planning(Dedmondswa.gov> Subject: Review of Public Works and Parks CIPs Dear Planning Board: I want to add my voice to those objecting to treating the restoration of the Edmonds Marsh as just a "storm water" project. A valuable public natural resource should not be viewed as just a place to dump storm water. Restoring the ecological function and health of the estuary requires a different and more comprehensive perspective for the marsh and its restoration. I have been following the issues surrounding the restoration of the Marsh and cannot understand the old school approach that is being taken by the City. Restoring the Marsh is not a mere engineering project but a much more complex ecological one that requires coordination with parks, wildlife and fisheries experts. Packet Pg. 334 8.2.g Specifically, I recommend that you delete the $17.2 million dollar Storm water item on page 73 of the Public Works CIP and move it into the placeholder item on page 12 of the Parks CIP. This work to restore the Marsh is not a engineering plumbing project to get rid of storm water but rather an ecological imperative. Let's address this critical need correctly and not as a Public Works project. Thank you for your consideration and I hope you will point this problem out to the Council. Please don't just "rubber stamp" the recommendations that are before you. Ron Eber 50 Pine Street Sent from Mail for Windows Packet Pg. 335 Dear Planning Commission Members: October 27, 2021 Many people have been saying that the budget and planning processes are being "expedited" because of the coming election. I hope there is a much better reason than that. Good plans for Edmonds survive elections even if the designers don't. How come there is never enough time taken, by the people we have elected, to have constructive discussions with the many knowledgeable people in our community who are willing to volunteer their time and expertise to help the Edmonds community? It appears that even when there is input given, solicited or otherwise, it is rarely considered if it is not in line with and supports where the Council or Mayor want to go Here is a case in point. In December of 2020 the Save Our Marsh (SOM) group of well- informed citizens, wrote a letter to the Edmonds council. In it they suggested, after much research, a change that needed to be considered to the Capital Facilities Plan (referred to below as the "CFP"). They wrote: "Restoring the tidal -estuarine functions of the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary and making necessary modifications to Marina Beach Park should NOT be placed under a Stormwater heading in the CFP; the focus of the estuary restoration project must be on ecological processes and benefits to salmon/wildlife as well as public recreation. As the SOM has suggested previously, a future CFP should place the restoration project under "Parks" (since the Edmonds Marsh is a wildlife reserve/sanctuary)" It saddens me to see wonderful opportunities to create exceptional environmental conditions fall victim to politics and political infighting. our local government seems to be becoming a microcosm of other larger governments, in that the thinking of the people that we elect revolves more around their staying elected or getting what they want rather than taking the time to effectively engage the community, lead a civilized discussion and listen to the needs of the people of Edmonds so that the Council can make community centered decisions. In the case of the Marsh/Estuary, we actually have time, since WSDOT doesn't even have the land yet and will not for at least a year, to really plan for the future of the Marsh/Estuary. Let's not jump ahead with unfounded and inappropriate decisions. Let's call on our Edmonds community to bring well thought out plans to the table before we hire outside consultants to tell us what is "right for Edmonds". Let's have a dialogue with the city staff and the community they are paid to serve. After last night's Council meeting, Oct. 26, 2021, 1 see what appears to be a simple fix before the issues pertaining to this project get more complex. I see it referenced in the CIP/CFP 73 of the Public Works and also considered a project on page 12 of Parks CFP/CIP that the Council is being asked to approve. I suggest that page 73 of the Public Works be deleted and its reference in the tables, then revise the description on page 12 of the Parks CFP to acknowledge the property ownership issues that are causing delays in the Parks and Recreation continuing their planning. That would put the project and funding decisions in the proper place and best position the city for grants to address restoration of salmon and their habitat. The storm water and tidal issues would be one part of an important whole relating to public recreation, community park extension and environmental rehabilitation of the marsh to a better functioning estuary and wetland. Let's things right, not just expedite! Thanks for reading this, Bernie Packet Pg. 336