Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Nuisance Tree Removal STF 2021-0032
CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION `ne. I STJ 07/02/2021 John Hushagen Seattle Arborcultural hushageniohnd@gmail.com Subject: Nuisance Tree Removal 729 Main Street Dear Mr. Hushagen, You have contacted the City of Edmonds on behalf of the property owners regarding the removal of one tree on the property located at 729 Main Street. The tree has a diameter at breast height (DBH) of at least 24 inches and thus is subject to the emergency ordinance for landmark trees adopted under Ordinance No. 4217. Ordinance No. 4217 only allows the removal of landmark trees outside of the development review process if the tree is a hazard tree or nuisance tree as defined by Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.10.020.G and 23.10.020.K. Ordinance No. 4218 adopted new tree code in Chapter 23.10 ECDC which included the documentation required for the removal of hazard and nuisance trees ECDC 23.10.040.F. For nuisance trees, ECDC 23.10.040.F.a provides: Nuisance tree with documentation of the damage and any tree work that has been attempted to rectify the nuisance, and/or a statement from the applicant's qualified tree professional explaining why no arboricultural practices can safely rectify the nuisance. You provided documentation with photos of the tree and the damage the tree is causing to a retaining wall (attached) along with a description that root pruning is not an option as removing critical roots to rebuild the wall would hasten the tree's decline and the tree is already in decline physiologically. The tree appears to be a nuisance tree as defined by ECDC 23.10.020.K and may be removed. ECDC 23.10.080 requires all significant trees removed to be replaced at a ratio determined by the DBH of the tree being removed. Since the subject nuisance tree is greater the 14 inches, it is required to be replaced at a ratio of three to one. ECDC 23.10.080.D notes the size of replacement trees must be 1.S inch caliper for deciduous species and six feet in height for evergreen species. The removal of the nuisance tree is approved with the following conditions: 1. This approval only pertains only to the one nuisance tree identified in the attached report. 2. A minimum of three replacement trees must be planted. Native species are preferred as indicated in ECDC 23.10.080.D.3. 3. Replacement trees must be planted within one year of removal of the hazard trees. Please notify the City once the replacement trees have been replanted for an inspection. 4. Trees shall be fell onto private property. 5. Vehicles and equipment shall be located on private property. Should it be necessary to utilize any portion of the City right-of-way, including the street or sidewalk, to perform any of this work then the contractor shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way construction permit in advance of starting work. A traffic control plan will be required as part of the right-of-way permit application. 6. Contractor/owner is responsible for keeping all debris on site and preventing any silt laden runoff from leaving the site and/or entering the city storm system. 7. Contractor/owner shall repair/replace any damaged sections of curb/gutter, sidewalk or other public improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project. 8. Contractor/owner is responsible for locating all on -site utilities and any utilities on neighboring properties that could be impacted by the tree removal. Relocation/revision/repair to any utilities may require separate permit. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions at amber.groll@edmondswa.gov, or 425-771-0220. Sincerely, Amber Groll Planner Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM July 2, 2021 Amber Groll, Planning Jennifer Lambert, Engineering PLN2021-0032 — Nuisance Tree Mardee Austin — 729 Main St Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with any future building permit application, if any, for development on the site. It is requested that the following be included as a condition of project approval. 1) Provide a Site Plan showing property lines and the location of the tree. This information can be submitted with the right-of-way permit. 2) Trees shall be fell onto private property. 3) Vehicles and equipment shall be located on private property. Should it be necessary to utilize any portion of the City right-of-way, including the street or sidewalk, to perform any of this work then the contractor shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way construction permit in advance of starting. A traffic control plan will be required as part of the right-of-way permit application. 4) Contractor/owner is responsible for keeping all debris on site and preventing any silt laden runoff from leaving the site and/or entering the city storm system. 5) Contractor/owner shall repair/replace any damaged sections of curb/gutter, sidewalk or other public improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project. 6) Contractor/owner is responsible for locating all on -site utilities and any utilities on neighboring properties that could be impacted by the tree removal. Relocation/revision/repair to any utilities may require separate permit. City of Edmonds CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION `ne. 18y\3 07/01/2021 John Hushagen Seattle Arborcultural hushageniohnd@gmail.com Subject: Hazard Tree Removal 729 Main Street Dear Mr. Hushagen, You have contacted the City of Edmonds regarding the removal of one tree on the property located at 729 Main Street. Upon reviewing the submitted documentation, the tree does not qualify as a hazard tree per the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC 23.10.020). "Hazard tree" means a tree that is dead, dying, diseased, damaged, structurally defective or exposed by recent removal of adjacent trees, which makes it subject to a high probability of failure as determined by a qualified tree professional." The project does appear to qualify as a nuisance tree (ECDC 23.10.020) "Nuisance tree" means a tree that is causing significant physical damage to a private or public structures and/or infrastructure, including but not limited to: sidewalk, curb, road, water or sewer or stormwater utilities, driveway, parking lot, building foundation, or roof." ECDC 23.10.040.F. says that a nuisance tree requires documentation of the damage and any tree work that has been attempted to rectify the nuisance, and/or a statement from the applicant's qualified tree professional explaining why no arboricultural practices can safely rectify the nuisance. Can you please provide clarification/documentation as to why there aren't any other ways to rectify the nuisance? Feel free to contact me if you have any questions at amber.groll@edmondswa.gov, or 425-771-0220. Sincerely, az f"Al Amber Groll Planner Groll, Amber From: John Hushagen <hushagenjohnd@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 7:42 PM To: Groll, Amber Subject: Tree at 721 Main St Ms. Groll, The Deodar Cedar at this address is not a high risk tree, but it is slowly dying as the foliage is dull green in color and more thinly distributed throughout the canopy. In addition, it was planted too close to an important retaining wall between the two properties and its large anchor roots have damaged the wall. If the tree were healthy, perhaps the wall could be repaired. Removing critical roots to rebuild the wall would likely hasten the tree's decline. I believe the tree should be considered a nuisance and a permit for its removal should be issued. Do you need a more formal statement from me on my company letterhead, or will this be sufficient? John Hushagen Seattle Arboricultural Associates Sent from my iPhone w June 4, 2021 CLIENT Mardee Austin 729 Main St. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 "I'SOCI NN"', ASSIGNMENT To travel to the above residential property to perform a Level 2 Visual Tree Health and Risk Assessment of a large Deodar Cedar tree on the site. METHODS/OBSERVATIONS A Level 2 Visual Tree Health and Risk Assessment is based on what the arborist can observe and measure from the ground. Such as assessment considers a tree's physiology and its structure to determine a failure risk rating. Questions about a tree's physiology include the following: How well is the tree growing? Is the shoot growth normal? Are the leaves or needles the correct color and size and well -distributed throughout the canopy? What is the extent of dead wood in the canopy? Questions about a tree's structure include: Is there evidence of decay in the trunk, roots, or stems? If so, how extensive is the decay? Does the tree have a history of past failures of branches or stems? Are there poorly attached branches or stems? Are there other obvious defects in the trunk or stems? The tree I examined is a 27" DBH Deodar Cedar, (Cedrus deodara), that grows near the southwest corner of the lot and at the property line. The tree is approximately 50' tall, with a spread of 40' and a Live Crown Ratio of 80%. 1 estimate the tree's age to be 50-55 years. I observed that in the upper half of the canopy, the shoot growth is below normal and the needles are a dull green color and distribution is poor. I believe this tree is in decline physiologically, and rate its overall health at between poor and fair. One of the attached photos shows a healthy deodar cedar located across the street and less than a block away, and 18032 17th Ave NW • Shoreline, Washington 98177 • (206) 510-4I07 • hushagenjohnd(0)gmtiil.com Member; Iniermnional Society nl' Arboriculture (ISA) • ISA Ccailied Arborist, PN•0108A the contrast between the two trees is obvious. Structurally the tree appears sound, and likely there is no decay in the trunk or roots. RECOMMENDATIONS Two of the photos show that the tree's large surface roots have grown into an adjacent concrete retaining wall and have cracked it and caused the wall to lean heavily to the east. If the tree is retained, this damage will increase over time. This is a case where a large tree in physiological decline has done damage to adjacent infrastructure. I believe this tree is only a moderate failure risk, however, it has clearly outgrown its space and should be removed. Please see the attached and enclosed ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form and contact me if you have further questions. John Hushagen, Consulting Arborist, Seattle Arboricultural Associates M.S. Urban Horticulture ISA Certified Arborist, PN-0108A ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor, (TRAQ) 18032 17th Ave NW • Shurelinc, Washington 99177 • (206) 510.4107 • hushagenjohndOgmail.con Me"1111wo lownuduwul St4 wq urA)1Ikw)%:uluuv (ISA) 0 ISA t'aeuAW A0,A* ot. N'N.aitmA B, .ic Tree Risk AssessmE x Form ISA Client Date Time Address/Tree location Tree no. / Sheet L of 2 Tree species dbh —2 Height Crown spread dia. Assessor(s) Time frame w N1 D Tools used l L Uiret Assessment Target zone Occupancy a e � c � - � c .J 3 z lte �rare Z « L '� " G = � ►'0 r Target description n x -occasional frequent ar .� b 3 - 4- constant L c E a tz 9 z 3 E4 History of failures Topography Flat[Z Slope❑ % Aspect Site changes None Grade chang Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydro) Root cuts❑ Describe Soil conditions Limited � volume Saturated ❑ Shallow�Compacted : Pavement over roots ❑ �% Describe S Prevailing wind direct w—k � Common weather Strong winds Ice ❑ Snow❑ Heavy rain LEf%Describe SL�►+�4 (, - __...r.•- �:�=��:-��i�. �,ealtki:an�S ecies•1-roZ;:,��s�,�:,{. �,_,,,-s:•L�.;�3�;�:c���;.;i?- �.,; Vigor Low Ef Normal ❑ High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal)❑ None (dead)❑ Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests Abiotic Species failure profile Branches Trunk Roots ❑ Describe M Wind exposure Protecteq9 Partial Full W Wind funneling❑_ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium J" Large❑ Crown density Sparse Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Interior branches Few Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or planned change in load factors - '^l:_9:'"- �;: .'.-•7. �;j%t':, .+� --- �=:1: :a:: - y:Gi• _ �.-J:.VC::S- .Ty-.,r. wi'x_, = rctd�G`0' �.t..< Tree;D'efecYssa dCohdifi6ns ff r 'A echfYgaHe�L•ikelifioodofFailu •� �=..•: -'x`-,n��--:-�•..:F4- .�..-_-'__• .. -..--.-d_.t�vx:Y:..-.ia....4 _ <-: ..f _:.n=;YS+-.=..,::,qf f.. C:'S _^`•.� .4r--:. ...,-..�_.._..-._GL^u_. s — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown ❑ LCR'�90—% Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches ❑ _% overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole Over -wended branches ❑ _%circ. Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other //DTI� Response growth -M4, Main concem(s) Load on defect N/A ❑ or ❑ Moderate Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar— Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze O Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean ° Corrected? Response growth Response growth Main ncern(s t'L� Main o icern(s) ` �C k 11 Load on defect N/A[] Minor Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor d M e to ❑ Significant ❑ Ukellhood of fa re Ukellhood of f Iruure Improbable Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Improbable l Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Conditions of concern 11 11111 - .. 1 �1 1 MoVix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible I Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely -Improbablej Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely MatrixZ Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High North Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low is Mo erate 0) igh ❑ Extreme O Work priority 10 2 M 3 O A ❑ Overall r dual risk Lo 13>' Mu �rateU Hlgh O Z'DYes-Type/Reasoo e ❑ Recommended inspection interval IQ� Data final O Prellminar Advanced assessment needod Inspection limitations one OVIsibility OALCeSS ©Vines Moot collar burled Describe II is tinlnshrct wns pmdurrd Iry Ibr Iutrmulluopl5ualaly ul ArinnIiidIun- (11A) and 14 unrudrd lnt uxr by'IIcc I(lak Aabr6a mw Q%i0dxd ( IAAQ) albotiala 20IJ h.._ _ 1 .11 Site Plan: 729 Main St., Edmonds, WA 98020 Alley MAIN ST - Retaining Wall Sidewalk Deodar Cedar • Utility Pole —� Side Sewer Line — Utility Lines M h; ml TA. ., • 41t� i, 3\a N ',y r� y R 4;#�� � r,��r �Syir i ,aJUirl -ni-.��, i � ��t`, � .i�\���j�:Vt�2 \U\�`.h+ ♦�' ?�, � \ +.`�, { Nt1i•�t�/t�pr,�,',j;�j ���{{, i;�: i. k aP �; •; I` 1 •Y� ;l'-.; I' • �'n !C 1 ' 9' l { t o b'• a `; ,,yy, �m , `I".l 4',,{{��j {irsr.A',a ,n,irn :,Y: ;�'r; y� `h,`I.{,i U'C sy v �,• - el^'v, ll}�. ,yaa lV`'1'., q.;.. l �?;. t:.-`�":. 4r�:,t e �/•�i,„1 {v�t}'( }t�r `."tl {+.y ;;`7,�t'�i u. ��eA'. L��S^k��i,t_�•y. ,'�,.� '#�.. �ly �� , ri:"�� Pt, �� r �r'P ,tr�f-9'ti�•-a+''�iif� r�`.Y'a56,� �3'''•I+�d'�;.�..:%��MF,"1 t��ts �5 i,�..'!, tteY,' ,;t�aj( at�3.�i.�• 11'al9t �` 1{ I a .•'Y a �- '��'�rU`�t r '`���' "i ( I a Ott P� � 1 t � @ .A ?i,.d• �, � �� "a'�...,t� i yyl.�j Yrij �' •':�vtlt �;, '� '���(,•�I�� �Z � tFj� 1� ��r'�" :,a�ii�r� ' �� �{Y 46� t / r i �a�' U �tV � 3 �µ�'lt�� �U. k���tT ,� './.� � f•,. u Y`r . fie. iV`��~� / � � •` V y� - 1. `�` ¢ei 1. ,� �4 in 'S,.:�., /fir. 1 � . ar � 1 '`: fj j .. w / •, �/�x� jY `{�� ' �+��1 �. �`.rC 'rl'F�1��� e {i it:�l � c�,l��j y�+�!1 ���ti:.re:�� � �.r� t� } t� f �r �i ' �� 15"� yf�' 1 � � 1 1•iT,6 $ i<r/'f \ll. `1� i"" q '�Q�S. r °C[C""` y�� � a� ' '9^'" �' l , +� �� `, , a � �� r'� r �Y�y� r t...�• i?�^ �' �*1,}s , t , �i;��/ s �i�, / � .� }l;) ,,.,fin• �a a,;rS-, �'�;;�'r'"j_ �..,.=�..., :�l� -�: �,,,1•'"'�'.���;�;a`.�: `- p�*, ��<'.�il�': `��_.��-ni•�''i;.` {J, s ..Pi,(;�54�(+"�� ,1f '. �� .� 'J, .•1 �� �Y'��%� � r'l� � S.S, v ��`, F + ,i ��pR r1 of;5 ••�..'�. JJr�� f#' �`33 A> t;••• 3 g � t•',q � Y :;i"�( d Y Jx �\',Y _, e• �. �,/ `1 rl�� ,o`G� I,.P" �Y' S"J f ��{�S �" 'L ��,. �L ti t� T, ',• _, Y*Ijt':� i �CIF�• 9 g �� v%�' y" ; t't^' ;� d� F'",y s ; h� 'rZ#' � `/ t,f� ,�y��� ', ; � ��;°'•� "�. •. j��/a h,5.ya��,� .f:�li # #ir.: ' �'. _•". Y �` ,��^`�� �.K. } `if?t�� %;�� ra *'X7v�� /:�� .(t`�+�'K ,ti�;�� "i#�re�i.;:ta^\F, _ Rt '. Qx s�'� ; S 1f�}}�ttf .e'• �= a .d'' > 3 h,;;� aU.l; `�' d}i,`�,f ,✓�'=.'G',l� r"_sl fy'i;,k (// 1p'.. �'� �I, f yir,�t< t�,� i` I t`�a <dR� •1;'• . 2a 1T y A'l- S +T Hr. �1 "i,i�i� '� .f�'.• � � r�' l�>r r = ' ��. .. � �� I le ;�•5���. w�,,• � •��� � r,�tR};�`�p•3��j�/":r ��`o� ,�`'y �, .i? -:I�'' r.,"ma's.Pp -+ , r, -'� lr .,.�',. j,`;, i 7• � i �l'e °5 � •rz is •rJ ' , h• `� i' � � `� a r• � Ir ': ��.` .t.7. "'4 .<:' ~.� 'sue 4 I - rl•� t+` ffv� , �.IR_r : t.iii � •q ,.�µY F..-�'�`,,^"' �, r'1,7�/a'- 1", ! " r', �) J ° � 'I�'J',^.`Fri , +t,• Yo IV- cy,�'- :< �Y y l 1. �i''r Y (+ "/° , , � •.t`�' L (e - r "Ti r rat<,• �: sa-:n •./ k � o^":<-"�'t% yx�.:_'�'k��,9,dr1.+Si::�.Y'r:�P,`•<`�i'1•ri .�!!:", ••N.1r ol 41,1 "— '✓. � ` .I1'%r-C'�'S'E��� 5`? 'ti � 5r�'+.'����'p `•�.'r'`�.;��re � � � ? 7v�u T/ ,7• iTi!' l.Il�f r`v e! t .� J t-ti+''f� `', •� ,. `��Ml• l� `• ,f°`'J j'�+?��;tit/.+;f '($ p'"S 9' ,iSF�it.� `��}T4 '; *a." 1^ j :Jr!/Yr,d __) �+! .1J`'?�,r/i "!$' `ti\ `•S' �,i..l '*.�ti �/ri � � 7."' � •. �,+% � . ��' a - • y r' �5 r S.D �i ' �� Apr.' Vf 41 t o n fin; X Il�" " G' ♦fir„� "gyp � :: M, �,•!�r `�,I J�J! �`, �' �Pr �- �. yi wit '��e � �, it ♦: \ , ,� :�.., . p . ti1� - �;,f. .,e i� 1 c�"' :.'+�Gl,a`��'`., �—r •� "G " all .ram ! c� di �:� A' .. "�;/ � -►. ,� rPT9F - ♦ -ti, T • `rP Is iFt v� I" ' t � w,1i''q `y.Ko . r Jai/ " Y �'� ,��'- ':,�� i;•� '®f o � 't w �y :,wti '� /„�'.OI -j�Z -\. ..! � ��s//1'�::., ./i.� .,yam r`: 3F`'-���'�•F. .y. ,ra .fr�s °�� t h -• :. .., ✓�� .�;! 1 . :�/; � r/, +`' � � •v�o. r.r `,' y:�%��'� �1� 1 .: �.S 1 3 .c a" +a.ti .L ds.+�"i 1 ice` •' ' j r o ° :g; .. Ps�ia ii•1�i�w+ �OV aAr1 ..fin +(,Yi u mS 5 r �' 3 3 � x� \ ,ar�gD �. �� • a4 i3'�i tloc .4•,. a1,�.y-'� 71 ��-'rWRSk v,� /t���j .\f-pnit' •''= h.'K ' � y � a�r k • t' _ ' � ,1 _..-. Jk '•;,4 �%fir a'f�'iv� +n f t � ��'� i A�..' ` � �' �\ ",P•✓ f• _ -� • � 1 9pRp�i�l >'11 y `- '! ��k..r. f��t' C �!•�s 'APB Er "'�� ♦3�?aji,f' �.:�4t.iix�0. � S c'`'f Na`1�it �.' TKO -.A �-k p C•, � �e.. qi- Fi jr f a � -,- '$q: +'+i � d`I��, a i ::r"a.oN;':p�"' �'•..y-o ,'•�' �i � �AS� '�. '1, e ..� �� _ ;.,r^ �•- ':. �. �, � ?: � ^ Nyv+NFi �'•�"�4z , r., . �'`9 • _ u;. �N7J':`S 1 �fra . ' '�'-. `�y '` ' �l .r 'v��� � �' Y •d�+ J, f $t `t_ - �� °^ .. a y+�� �:�:� ,de 1C- � / 'k:'Y, -h,. -�'!tYtY/. 'ap4 +7 •:'�,ia .;.__� Y>t: :'a;Ft'y.+snx'�• ` 'a�•�. ��iS.��w�f, uY.{��T_ NYdiaa•• a ,.' �'� C, :,.'ro =:, "i%°�1rkyhiJsy�.^.'.k1i .fi..� J ,x of �. �r .� . ct4�..t , a� r '3't, •sA. L•r''.�.�` .., .S~.s .y¢�.•.•,. ,7''�x ,�'�' p to ,r� h � ,�,�, •." ;:J � � k• t� `i, t s a � s: °/ i M�.. r � �.: r'. ,�i�'S �ti' a:. ���a ¢� ^4 c `. l'j� ua.� • � >tF•,^o,G),'�' .Y�l�, ./•. :r '•e �f}}v,. im1 •ly`'Sv ?,i431, s:x4f:Aju,�, FI"^sk c,3�• I , ' ,f •�; �,� j,, a, ♦9 C'�S w� gea��p 1 f �..+rt1p.".<, t >" �ti.k•• �..�.#�y ... yy ;,�, �• '�t, c - >. � � ��� v .rir.•,�'.'•p, f �'• '�1rv,� 4 l}': rp'sk§ t�:^�+ �,N ♦ u•�3�1�'1f+6��y��t { -�4'+ �t�Gp�Jiv}t�'7'tic�ii�� y��-r�t �♦�.w..,r `��F � T� -'1-i��l ������ p�R:�. `'"^vS1F:`,'� Jhj� �r<q��,''�`�j�jV�"°' V ' IMI�at tr1 �' d ����Etv � 4� �+ � '`U/ � /' ,, ! .o ii�' c."',►�•f'�� � - ^�. 1 1_ ��' p ER 440V 14 p.a +�.`'A,, I7•h \�. , 1 J-�'i S y� •Wy A � 1 i'y /� � - '�l �i Y� ��'" r !� � � I�'°�(• ,�,. _ar`4' �t 1Sj �4•� lT �',{�r. _+S ,,.��� ��-�jry::.,_ �pgy'-�'' ��I�l�SA3��u y q•'. q :'" •ar�''C\ •' Xril�y'•' ; r 'iS ;•.- •C(�:L • _ > i� _ �r'r-c-�� . wj�� x � �.,y 'yam � `�k °�.�` .�• 1 VFW -+w-+��';.. k• � �� �� •,� �, P11t�^_ � n''F, ,'R ��w';;.a ! v�f">'oy idFi-.�k' 'T i •Yr''jk Vy r� .1;` ,y- `�.... �r.1 N ^'�•1V § y n olO n.,�'o NLy v1:i' .��;�v9.: lWXYO%'1a 44rl, � jin �d - t i b •� �� 1 1 �. M � �' ,�'. c �' }, ram• � � rf.,,�r t �y ,�c+� � F_ /'�'� � � y� � • "`7.wi }� � ��` >ti by '� ° �,. 3•tt, ,�. . � ya.,�.,�J'','�yk':'.::31 .> ....:� p•;,�is MIA` / iS• �r -.;\T � -� �\ � �.:' �.IA�i�h ,���'. ,'ua Tw.S'."•'AY:•r.� F� � r r-V l• �NV/`yls.S�'L, . •r-•.. e�� e. ,• f; J ;• I q ki� uu f 1 n i A'�y 1. _ ` n i I �!�► � � �� �8°1P��wyAFtb� ill :i � .t..�. h���� i'�' ,. r — ---- '�► +� a,'� „�^ti'`1-r`.,.rk {" _ ♦ _`_ ��. c�` \ �/ :•'ay�� a 5g� < - ,' tk'x7. \� �. ` � � Iles_•• c 1-•,- - , �\�• ,'sue' i .� - �- d ': � �. �' ,r * '�'% -�. i v ck, Av it �• �'� �` �v � �- 1 •''Y. s'i•' ''•h, fit. f > � � ,r �` cx�1 /r �-/!",�—.'r(t.4;�{`�� F t/ . p J+�c/�� S'Sr/:"•d� �t � �::?�(; n `�'*' '_�' � - ,A ,_ ./�' "�� i� •• `�� G •Idly r, i1 Q 6 � -n , �� � �e�• � �, '.e. / yy�e/.' �i'.yjy-/�/-� t■■`. ° ? 1''.iE- �- •'!s' •^� • 1 '•L a . - �. r i `4'�,;'�''� �f�°� � � -, d• .��-jrr'__j,{.��._.j� ' �` 1j+ 7�" .��jYi { 5 � ?. Ot •- y ,� � ��' t .. �� .�y m� `to ,'� }/�� •L:'.r-s>J '_ y �rc..� r�� ��.. � ��, � ? � � b c� !f • ' F �y � �� a i �� � �•.� ;'t�yif/! j?,Y�~�7��'r�� � ,iD % l,F=-7�� � { � � . �'l, s/{•�01 �`r 6 ,i� J ,1" tr, �6} j.+ . t ,� .jR ��Fn� f e,.•'j•-a'A�?%K�•�' ��. / A. 'Sry' �j•V � .1�. �• f li��., y4 �7 `�jc' � i T F 'f, �I. �..�.,�.`. .�.•-li�� .. I. �' .,. .., s: ' . '��-< ! .,,1 r�t9.'^" _ S y"•n"...P � , ,.�• . r nS,,,,�s,��, �...;�.`' : 'd �' _ r� - �� .A�"'��Y �: \'�i►�� ��j•�\ii`::`r"]] '�•�'.;L,It ��-�7,'�a�lY,fv�i-7� �•gYt.�:�[`\�1<�,' c.•`�-� ��r,��" `��y`�t"vJ,. � `� ''f�.�+f ��ar. Z� � ;iy .?t.:>,•r.'{T'j- � �.;:ti. '�.\\y;;\1,"'.a/..�:.i''� i�Y.�� �� • • ��� ��a-� - ;� ��,jr� =-�" t �' '�w `t '�•�a•_. '�.`�.��:t '��k\:w..�i>i` 1� � .�.'����t9., !' `"�`t,..t `�:��Ct, 6�•��v'i1. � `w�i._ ... �.� "-�.�i'