DNS REVIEWED PLN BLD2020-0733+ARBORIST REPORT+9.12.2021_10.17.35_PM+2403889Katy Bigelow
206.351.1375
arboristkaty@gmail.com
July 5, 2021
Chris Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd.
Edmonds, WA 98026
Dear Mr. Pichner:
Thank you for asking me to assess trees on property you own in Edmonds, WA for the purpose
of providing observations related to their health and stability on the hillside on which they grow.
To evaluate the trees addressed in this letter I combined my field experience and education with
current accepted practices as defined by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and
the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA).
The tools I used to make an assessment are limited to a rubber mallet, binoculars, compass, laser
pointer, diameter tape and hand trowel unless otherwise noted. A visual tree assessment and
other methods are only conclusive for the day of inspection and do not guarantee that conditions
will remain the same in the future.
I was asked by Mr. Pichner to assess two Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees growing
south of his garage on a critical slope. On July 2, 20211 completed a Level 2 tree assessment of
both trees and discussed work to terrace the area near the trees with Mr. Pichner. All levels of
tree assessment are explained in an attachment to this report.
Both trees I assessed are mature Douglas -fir species. They stand close to the top of a steep slope
comprised of loose and sandy soils.
The trees are generally in good health with few visible defects. Sounding of the base of both
trees indicated that both lower trunks were intact with no indication of internal rot. The
easternmost tree has very good annual growth increments while the westernmost tree has slightly
less than average growth increments.
During my site visit Mr. Pichner discussed his work to remove construction trash and hazardous
waste from the hillside below the trees that had been covered by decades of blackberry growth.
He had also removed the blackberry and other invasive species growing on the slope and built
three retaining walls in an effort to better retain slope soils, primarily to decrease soil erosion
around the two Douglas -fir trees I assessed.
Tree assessment — Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA
July 5, 2021
The retaining walls were then backfilled with soil to create a level grade (Photos 1-3). Neither
the soil fill or the height of the retaining walls covered up the low trunks of the trees although the
westernmost tree was the slightly more impacted of the two by the work on its westernmost side.
Mr. Pichner was asked to remove a portion of the newly terraced area as it had been constructed
within a stream buffer area. It is my very strong opinion that work to do this will significantly
decrease the stability of soils around the westernmost Douglas -fir and will remove feeder roots
which have begun to establish in the soil added below its trunk. It is my opinion that the terraced
areas should stay intact to decrease the possibility of this tree becoming more mobile in wind
(more hazardous) and less viable by losing new roots.
It is my strong opinion that the terraced area has created a more stable area of soil around both
trees and in particular, the westernmost fir. Although the area below the trees is currently now
more exposed to rain and water runoff due to vegetation and trash debris being removed,
replanting with trees and shrubs and adding mulch to cover bare soils can decrease this potential.
Thank you very much for calling me for your arboricultural concerns.
LA��_
Katy Bigelow
Board Master Certified Arborist
PNWISA member # PN-6039B
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
Registered Consulting Arborist® #490
Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 2 of 7
Tree assessment — Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA
July 5, 2021
Levels of Tree Assessment
LEVEL 1: The Level 1 assessment is a visual assessment from a specified perspective of an individual
tree or a population of trees near specified targets to identify obvious defects or specified conditions. A
limited visual assessment typically focuses on identifying trees with an imminent and/or probable
likelihood of failure.
Limited visual assessments are the fastest but least thorough means of assessment and are intended
primarily for large populations of trees.
LEVEL 2: This is a basic assessment completing a detailed visual inspection of a tree and surrounding
site, and a synthesis of the information collected. This assessment requires that a tree risk assessor walk
completely around the treelooking at the site, buttress roots, trunk, and branches.
A basic assessment may include the use of simple tools to gain additional information about the tree or
defects. Basic is the standard assessment that is performed by arborists in response to a client's request
for tree risk assessment. Simple tools may be used for measuring the tree and acquiring more information
about the tree or defects. However, the use of these tools is not mandatory unless specified in the Scope of
Work.
LEVEL 3: Advanced assessments are performed to provide detailed information about specific tree
parts, defects, targets, or site conditions. They are usually conducted in conjunction with or after a basic
assessment if the tree risk assessor needs additional information and the client approves the additional
service. Specialized equipment, data collection and analysis, and/or expertise are usually required for
advanced assessments. These assessments are therefore generally more time intensive and more
expensive.
Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 3 of 7
Tree assessment — Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA
July 5, 2021
Photos
iM ,
dt
}_':= .ems--_ .•#r.".
qmq�%IMI
. yam.. f .. _ - ' • _ ... ' - � -
Photo 1: Location of the westernmost tree relative to the garage and newly installed retaining
walls.
Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 4 of 7
`I' I
fyo '
I
OT
O
�i
a
Tree assessment — Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA
July 5, 2021
Ali
Photo 3: Looking downhill from the location of the easternmost tree at the steep grade which used to
mimic the angle of the property line fence.
Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 6 of 7
Tree assessment — Pichner
8120 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA
July 5, 2021
Assumptions, Limiting Conditions and General Waiver
I, Katy Bigelow, certify that:
I have personally inspected the tree(s) and or the property referred to in this report;
I have no current or prospective financial or other interest in the vegetation or the property which
is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias in favor of or against any of the
involved parties or their respective position(s), if any;
The analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are the product of my independent
professional judgment and based on current scientific procedures and facts, and the foregoing
report was prepared according to commercially reasonable and generally accepted arboricultural
standards and practices for the Pacific Northwest and Puget Sound areas;
The information included in this report covers only those trees that were examined and reflects
the condition of the trees as of the time and date of inspection;
This report and the opinions expressed herein are not intended, nor should they be construed, as
any type of warranty or guarantee regarding the condition of the subject trees in the future;
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions ("CC&Rs") may restrict the number, type and height of
vegetation on the subject property, and I have made no investigation regarding whether the
property is subject to such CC&Rs; and
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and
correct and information provided by others is assumed to be true and correct.
I am not an attorney or engineer. This report does not cover these areas of expertise and
represents advice only of arboricultural nature. Without limiting the generality of the preceding
sentence, it is specifically understood that nothing contained in this report is intended as legal
advice, or advice or opinions regarding soil stability or zoning laws, and this report should not be
relied upon to take the place of such advice.
Katy Bigelow
Board Master Certified Arborist
PNW ISA member # PN-6039B
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
Registered Consulting Arborist® #490
Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 7 of 7