Loading...
REVIEWED STM Quality Geo Letter (5-16-2021) - 8112 Talbor Rd - Infiltration Addendum (QG20-082 & QG21-039) (1)LIALITY EO 12/21 /2020 Danielle Hill 8112 Talbot Rd Edmonds, WA Subject: 8112 Talbot Rd — Infiltration Addendum 8112 Talbot Rd, Edmonds, WA QG Project No.: QG20-082 & QG21-039 Dear Ms. Hill: At your request, Quality Geo NW, PLLC (QG) has completed a supplementary infiltration investigation for your project. QG understands that the city requests a geotechnical consultation to evaluate infiltration potential of site soils, and to provide any additional and necessary recommendation regarding stormwater considerations. The following addendum presents the findings and conclusions of our literature review, addresses feasibility of proposed site development, and provides additional geotechnical recommendations for stormwater design intended to reduce the inherent risks associated with site development within a potentially geologically hazardous area. SITE INVESTIGA TION METHODOL OGY Site exploration activities were performed on 4/21/2021. Exploration locations were marked in the field by an QG Project Geologist with respect to the provided map and cleared for public conductible utilities. Our exploration locations were selected by an QG Project Geologist prior to field work to provide safest access to relevant soil conditions. The geologist directed the advancement of 2 excavated test pits (TP). The test pits were advanced within the vicinity of the anticipated development footprint areas, to depths of 10.0 feet below present grade (BPG) in general accordance with the specified contract depth. During explorations QG logged each soil horizon we encountered, and field classified them in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Representative soil samples were collected from each unit, identified according to boring location and depth, placed in plastic bags to protect against moisture loss, and were transported to the soil laboratory for supplemental Quality Geo NW, PLLC Geotechnical Investigations & Engineering Consultation Phone: 253-202-3675 1 Web: qualitygeonw.com I Mail: 420 Golf Club Rd SE, Ste 203, Lacey, WA 98503 8112 Talbot Rd Consult 5/16/2021 classification and other tests. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS: Quality Geo NW, PLLC Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 A general characterization of on -site soil units observed through local exposures on site within fallen tree pits. • Cover Soils — Silty Sand (SM): In both test pits, QG encountered an overriding layer of orange/brown silty sand. The soils were heavily mottled, suggesting the delayed percolation of stormwater. This unit extended from the surface to as deep at 3 feet across the site. • Outwash Sand — Sand (SP): The dominant underlying native soil across the upland and slope, appears to comprise a tan/gray sand, typically becoming cleaner with depth. These soils more closely resemble a recessional glacial outwash soil rather than a dense glacial till. The unit extended from 3 feet beyond 10 feet below present grade. Groundwater elevation is inferred to exist at or near the creek elevation. DISCUSSION RECOMMENDATIONS The findings of QG's site reconnaissance at the subject site do not indicate any excessively prohibitive conditions exist for the site, assuming appropriate site management efforts are maintained. Infiltration Rate Determination: During test pit excavations for general site investigation, QG additionally collected representative samples of native soil deposits among potential infiltration strata and depths. Soils across the site were identical. Representative soil samples were selected to characterize the sitewide infiltration conditions. We understand the project will be subject to infiltration design based on the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (DoE SMMWW). For initial site infiltration characterization within the scope of this study, laboratory gradation analyses were completed including sieve and hydrometer tests for stormwater design characterization and rate determination to supplement field observations. Results of laboratory testing in terms of rate calculation are summarized below. 8112 Talbot Rd Consult Quality Geo NW, PLLC 5/16/2021 Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 Laboratory results were interpreted to recommended design inputs in accordance with methods of the 2019 DoE SMMWW. Gradation results were applied to the Massmann (2003) equation (1) to calculate Ksat representing the initial saturated hydraulic conductivity. (1) log10(Ksat) = -1.57 + 1.90*D10 + 0.015*D60 - 0.013*D90 - 2.08*ff Corrected Ksat values presented below are a product of the initial Ksat and correction factor CFT. For a generalized site -wide design situation, we have applied a site variability factor of CFv = 1.0 along with typical values of CFt = 0.4 (for the Grain Size Method) and CFm = 0.9 (assuming standard influent control). (2) CFT=CFvxCFtx CFm = 1.0 x 0.4 x 0.9 = 0.36 Results were cross-referenced with test pit logs to determine the validity and suitability of unique materials as an infiltration receptor. Additional reduction factors were applied for logical rate determination. Table 1. Results Of Massmann Analysis TP Sample Unit Soil Fines Ksat Corrected LT Design Cation Exchange Organic # Depth Extent Type D10 D60 D90 o (/o) (in/hr) Ksat Infiltration Capacity Content BPG t (in/hr) Rate in/hr (meq/100g) % 1&2 5.0 3 to —1 .5 sand 0.194 1.678 28.75 3.2 34.27 11.25 2.5 2.8 0.8 Beneath sod and cover soils, the lower clean outwash sands were observed to generally exhibit minimal fines content and minimal oxidation patterns. Based on the proximity of the slope to the house, it is advised that the project engineer consider infiltration between the house and the street, rather than between the house and the slope. Based on the thick overriding layer of silty sand we do not recommend the designer pursue pervious pavements. The amount of overexcavation required to expose suitable infiltration soils is too excessive for such efforts at this time. For typical in -ground infiltration features infiltrating into the underlying clean sand (with their base below 3 feet in dept) we recommend a maximum design rate of up to 2.5 inch/hour be considered, which is typically suitable for most infiltration galleries, and considers potential reductions from compaction during construction. These rates are considered applicable to all areas of the subject site at the specified depths. QG recommends the facility designer review these results and stated assumptions per reference literature to ensure applicability with the proposed development, level of anticipated controls, and long- term maintenance plan. The designer may make reasonable adjustments to correction factors and the resulting design values based on these criteria to ensure design and operational intent is ki 8112 Talbot Rd Consult 5/16/2021 Quality Geo NW, PLLC Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 met. We recommend that we be contacted if substantial changes to rate determination are considered. Treatment Potential: Depending on stormwater and runoff sources, some stormwater features such as rain gardens or pervious pavements may require treatment. Stormwater facilities utilizing native soils as treatment media typically require Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC) of greater than 5 milliequivalents per 100grams (meq/100g) and organic contents greater than 1% (this may vary depending on local code). Soils at likely infiltration depths did not meet these requirements. If treatment of stormwater is required, treatment media may need to be added, depending on the project engineer's final design. CLOSING. - We trust this letter satisfies your project needs currently and thank you for the opportunity to be of service. QG wishes you the best while completing the project. Respectfully Submitted, Quality Geo, PLLC )21 —Luke Preston MST F G_ I Licensed Engineering Geologist Attachments: Limitations Appendix A. Site Region and Vicinity Maps Appendix B. Aerial Site Map 4 8112 Talbot Rd Consult 5/16/2021 LIMITATIONS Quality Geo NW, PLLC Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 Upon acceptance and use of this report, and its interpretations and recommendations, the owner shall agree to indemnify and hold harmless QG, including its owners, employees and subcontractors, from any adverse effects resulting from development and occupation of the subject site. Ultimately, it is the owner's choice to develop and live in such an area of possible geohazards (which exist in perpetuity across the earth in one form or another), and therefore the future consequences, both anticipated and unknown, are solely the responsibility of the owner. By using this report for development of the subject property, the owner must accept and understand that it is not possible to fully anticipate all inherent risks of development. The recommendations provided above are intended to reduce (but may not eliminate) such risks. This report does not represent a construction specification or plan and shall not be used or referenced as such. The information included in this report should be considered supplemental to the requirements contained in the project plans & specifications and should be read in conjunction with the above referenced information. The selected recommendations presented in this report are intended to inform only the specific corresponding subjects. All other requirements of the above - mentioned items remain valid, unless otherwise specified. Recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the proposed development and construction activities, field observations and explorations, and laboratory test results. It is possible that soil and groundwater conditions could vary and differ between or beyond the points explored. If soil or groundwater conditions are encountered during construction that differ from those described herein, or If the scope of the proposed construction changes from that described in this report, QG should be notified immediately in order to review and provide supplemental recommendations. The findings of this study are limited by the level of scope applied. We have prepared this report in substantial accordance with the generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice as it exists in the subject region. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The recommendations provided in this report assume that an adequate program of tests and observations will be conducted by a WABO approved special inspection firm during the construction phase in order to evaluate compliance with our recommendations. This report may be used only by the Client and their design consultants and only for the purposes stated within a reasonable time from its issuance, but in no event later than 18 months from the date of the report. It is the Client's responsibility to ensure that the Designer, Contractor, Subcontractors, etc. are made aware of this report in its entirety. Note that if another firm assumes Geotechnical Engineer of Record responsibilities they need to review this report and either concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendations or provide alternate findings, conclusions and recommendation. Land or facility use, on- and off -site conditions, regulations, or other factors may change over time, and additional work may be required. Based on the intended use of the report, QG may recommend that additional work be performed and that an updated report be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by the Client or anyone else will release QG from any liability resulting from the use of this report. The Client, the design consultants, and any unauthorized party, agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless QG from any claim or liability associated with such unauthorized use or non-compliance. We recommend that QG be given the opportunity to review the final project plans and specifications to evaluate if our recommendations have been properly interpreted. We assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. 5 - � ATM: •'�,�• Edmonds, WA 9802 + A _ SDUihest +�. • t a Op+Count ' Park Lostco:Wh I ILI PW 1Jj +il � 4 } y .1' Google ..,rr}_• 1€�!y r•. I�fi 4Y 1 } 8112' ,-Ihot. R Ed on `I , lhA98 2 h"• ,s , i 1 r Super r i �p• L _1 i►�st� nF 'vi�'- V� 4. y�'� �` •�T �'. •�` _ - y'. .� �"-: - Cr �,� ab'�=� 1 .a f Google A.14!-:lp 8112 Talbot Rd Consult Quality Geo NW, PLLC 5/16/2021 Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 Appendix B. Aerial Site Map Talbot Rd #w Site Map Source: King County L1DAR & WA DNR Quality Geo, PLLC g112 Talbot Rd Scale & Locations are approximate Not for Construction Quality Geo NW, PLLC Geotechnical Investigations & Engineering Consultation Phone: 253-202-3675 1 Web: qualitygeonw.com I Mail: 420 Golf Club Rd SE, Ste 203, Lacey, I& 0 60 SCALE (FEET) Figure 2 WA 98503 8112 Talbot Rd Consult Quality Geo NW, PLLC 5/16/2021 Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 Appendix C. Laboratory Testing Results Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Geotenhlvcal E.ngneering • Special Inspection - Metenels Testing - Enviromnenlfll Consulting Sieve Report P-J-11- Q-C'.. Quatily Gar, PLLC UWM R-i-d::.2.hprv21 LI, i---h Ilm-m-liun S-1- Pruj-1 N- 21SO 9 tiamplyd Br_ CL;emd rir Lgaded Sand x Lh (.aawdO Jie•l-- Q. •*y Cm, PLLC V.I. I-lyd: ''R-Apr'-1 LIIA�MD.7A87 rulerHd�TI?-] ia� 3 ft'I estud H% :. L�i:rr_ ACCRE04TE4 tian nY- B214548 �«•••• ��•••�. "•••• "•.• ANI M QdY 14,.45'I'.FS B-2419, AhTM 1343I.I. ASTH 10.511E1 I5. J I-': �.. %C--1 - 2S5".o C-I . of 0-1unr,{'� - I)S3 Sp-bl-bl- Riv. a.I aJ .. °%^ - 683°e C--1E aruuir ky.C:L - IA4 N. spas QiiA L250 n"n %Sill.& C4ay-3.2% 1-U.&J.L-3-89 Sr.q1r M-h *-I NIA Gib- 6A 18- Liquid Limit- We Pi fic Limil - uh Day- 1.240 n PL.L kyln&- ua Mvxlurx 56,- npled - 5-;% and F. D'- U'm Illll] Sgw-Y m1 - a P&4d SaodEqui Lmi - 6-,_- 3xs.'tu Imn Fm -1L L F-- ry Req'd Fmrrua14 I F-- Im, 0.mi3 : `v FTa ml ". I. Farr, - n. d Frac1- kr ,1, F.. - ASTAI A.M. AST 81 D490, ASTM C40 .ter A A -pal ,d i Irur0.rl, r Psrren k',mn i F-6d, r rmrL hat - e,rrm • mraia r ii'a8 91en I. SLx lPeirir tiprt, 41.x spry MI• L100` 30000 101r. IU ir. 0.0% IQuil- 15UA0 1011% L"-[r% 0.0% I "11110 IOU% L00.0'd 0.0% '� � nUlr 111111 i0M 1001. L00.0% 0.0% 4 Vlr LDom Iw% LOX-O% 0.0% tl11, 71J00 100% L00.M 0.0% ' 4- 63J00 100 , L00..O% -0.0% ' ulr AN IN% 1W% L00.0% 0.0% m 175- 000 98% L00.0% 0.0% 1111 37-4 94% L00.0% -0.0% I _i 3LS0 911. L(a fr% 0.0% 06 LA , 23A0 S2% 89'. L00.0% 0.0% 1A: 19A0 94% JJa•. L00..O% 0.0% � .n 3.B L6A0 ziY•. L00.0'd 0.0% L2• 12 4 93% K3•. L00.4C: 0.0% 3.t. 9-% 70% 79•. L00.04i 0.0% n L.+4• G-30 '7J•, L9P.4}S 0.0% tl4 4-7S 71% 71•. L00.0% 0.0% tlS 23d n.•. L00.0% 0.0% n tll0 200 67% n'•. L9P.UA 0.0% JA tl7JT 0.7L{I dl•. L00.1r% 0.0% tl30 0.600 3S•. L00-Q% 0.0% a40 0.4°5 31% 31•. L00.0% 0.0% •s ,m d5o 0.300 �•. 0 Loo (r% 0.0% tl60 0.250 15% L00.-04L 0.0% tl80 0, 9% L00-U'd .0.0% tl100 0.150 RSL 6!G LM(r% 0.0% tl140 0.LOn d!i LM.0% tl170 0.090 d94 L00.0% .00% tl2170 Gd:S ._ 3.2'.5 LdO.-04r 0.41k - :. �- --•� i'umnent J. kl�.0 Blo,�g0�,rtiL-, Quality Geo NW, PLLC Geotechnical Investigations & Engineering Consultation Phone: 253-202-3675 1 Web: qualitygeonw.com I Mail: 420 Golf Club Rd SE, Ste 203, Lacey, WA 98503 8112 Talbot Rd Consult 5/16/2021 PNtiAoo�tl aaa, FERIALS TESTING CHRYSL€R DR urlington , WA 99233 �boratory #: 521-07463 Cation Exchange CEC rneq/100g Other Tests: Organic Matter (L01 360} Quality Geo NW, PLLC Project # QG20-082 & QG21-039 '� MIIW 11��. sot test farm consultants, inc. a¢[rypm. wwx u`a w1ap17 *...e.x.orxu. �Fwa.a ON[r. iianlMiE@Y IM iYilihSai: ,d{rtihiid9? +w.any Date Received: 4/27/2021 Grower 21SO19 QC Field: 821-0540 HILLTP-1 AT . _ Sampled By: Customer Account 4: Sall Test Results Customer Sample ID: 2.8 PH 1:1 E.C.1:1 m.mhos/cm Est Sat Paste E.C. rn,mhos/cm Effervescence S %. Ammonium - N mg/kg Organic Matter W.B. % 9 Lbs 71 iy, ENR: