Loading...
2022-06-09 Hearing Examiner Packeto Agenda - Edmonds Hearing Examiner tn.. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUNE 9, 2022, 3:00 PM REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION IN PERSON MEETING - COUNCIL CHAMBERS Meeting ID: None CALL TO ORDER APPROVED MINUTES PUBLIC PORTION HEARING MATERIALS 1. City of Edmonds Parks Department Greenhouse Setback Variance PUBLIC COMMENT ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Hearing Examiner Agenda June 9, 2022 Page 1 3.A.1 Hearing Examiner Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/9/2022 City of Edmonds Parks Department Greenhouse Setback Variance Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michael Clugston Background/History This is a new project (File PLN2022-0027). Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions as described in the attached staff report to the Hearing Examiner and exhibits. Narrative The Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services is requesting a setback and landscaping variance to replace the City's aging greenhouses at the City Park maintenance yard. A new greenhouse would be constructed in approximately the same location as two existing smaller greenhouses, which have been in their current location for almost 40 years. A request to alter the required replacement landscaping within the setback area is also included. The variance permit requires public notice prior to a public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner (Type III-B decision according to Section 20.01.003 of the Edmonds Community Development Code [ECDC]). Attachments: PLN2022-0027 Staff Report to HE and Exhibits Packet Pg. 2 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Project: Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Setback and Landscaping Variance Requested Permits: PLN2022-0027 Date of Report: June 2, 2022 Staff Contact: _ u� Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner Public Hearing: June 9, 2022 at 3:00 P.M. Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250 - 51h Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND PROCESS The Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services is requesting a setback and landscaping variance to replace the City's aging greenhouses at the City Park maintenance yard. A new greenhouse would be constructed in approximately the same location as two existing smaller greenhouses, which have been in their current location for almost 40 years. A request to alter the required replacement landscaping within the setback area is also included. The variance permit requires public notice prior to a public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner (Type III-B decision according to Section 20.01.003 of the Edmonds Community Development Code [ECDC]). II. EXHIBITS 1. Greenhouse project narrative 2. City Park Master Plan 3. Site photos 4. Project site plan 5. Greenhouse plans 6. Public notice documentation 7. Staff technical comments 8. Land use application Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 3 3.A.1.a III. PUBLIC NOTICE A "Notice of Application" for the land use permit was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Development Services Department, and the Library on May 19, 2022 (Exhibit 6). The notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site and to the related taxpayer addresses if those were different from the property owner addresses. A "Notice of Public Hearing" for the land use permit was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Development Services Department, and the Library on May 26, 2022 (Exhibit 6). The notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site and to the related taxpayer addresses if those were different from the property owner addresses. As of the date of this report, no public comments have been received. IV. ZONE DISTRICT STANDARDS Since the subject site is zoned Public (P), the development standards in ECDC 16.80 apply. 1. Use. Master -planned community parks (subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070) are permitted uses in the P zone. Facilities designed to serve that use such as restrooms, minor shelters, safety lighting, benches, tables, minor service support structures, and associated storage and maintenance yards are permitted secondary uses. [ECDC 16.80.010.A & B] Edmonds adopted the City Park Master Plan in 1992 (Exhibit 2). The Parks Maintenance facilities at City Park are a permitted secondary use. 2. Minimum setbacks. A minimum landscaped setback of 20 feet shall be maintained from a public street or other property lines, except that a setback of 25 feet shall be maintained for all structures, structured play areas and structured athletic fields from adjacent residentially zoned properties. These setbacks shall be fully landscaped. [ECDC 16.80.030.A] The Parks maintenance yard and existing greenhouses are at the southwest corner of City Park (Exhibits 3 & 4). The yard is not adjacent to residentially zoned property but is across the street from residentially zoned parcels south of Pine Street. The existing greenhouses are nonconforming with respect to the required 20' street property line setback from both Pine Street and SR-104 on the west. The existing greenhouses were installed in the early 1980s and the current Public (P) zone code was adopted in 2001; it is unknown what the required setback was when greenhouses were installed or if there was one. There is a separate existing building to the east (Prop Building) that encroaches nearly to the street property line at Pine Street. Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 4 3.A.1.a The Parks Department has applied for the subject variance to reduce the setback for the new greenhouse to 11' from the west street property line (currently about 5') and 14' from the south street property line (matching the current 14'). 3. Height. The maximum height of a building in this zone shall be 25 feet, unless a conditional use permit has been obtained, except that the height of schools shall be governed by ECDC 17.100.050(1). A conditional use permit for additional height may permit structures up to a maximum height of 60 feet. [ECDC 16.80.030.B] The new greenhouse would be approximately 18' tall (Exhibit 5). The existing greenhouses to be replaced are approximately 8' tall while the adjacent Prop Building is about 12' 6" tall. 4. Lot coverage. The maximum lot coverage by buildings and other structures shall not exceed 35 percent unless a conditional use permit has been obtained. [ECDC 16.80.030.C] Per ECDC 21.15.110, coverage means the total ground coverage of all buildings or structures on a site measured from the outside of external walls or supporting members or from a point two and one-half feet in from the outside edge of a cantilevered roof, whichever covers the greatest area. City Park is approximately 14 acres, about 1% of which would be covered by the proposed greenhouse and other existing park structures. 5. Signs. All signs shall be subject to ADB approval. Signs shall be kept to a minimum size, which is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and uses, while providing adequate visibility. [ECDC 16.80.030.D] All signage shall be erected and maintained in compliance with Chapter 20.60 ECDC. [ECDC 17.100.070.D] No signs are proposed at this time. 6. Landscaping. Site landscaping is reviewed against the requirements of ECDC 20.13 [ECDC 16.80.030.E] As noted above in Subsection 2, the street setback area is to be fully landscaped. There is substantial existing landscaping near the south and west property lines adjacent to the maintenance yard (Exhibits 3 & 4), but the replacement of the greenhouse would require the installation of two trees within the setback area adjacent to the greenhouse. That planting would make the area more consistent with Type III landscaping in ECDC 20.13.030.C: Type Ill landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center, and Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 5 3.A.1.a 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years, or 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted: a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. The setback areas are intended to be replanted with shrubs and groundcovers meeting the Type III requirement but Parks has applied reduce or eliminate the requirement to replant two trees in that location. 7. Parking. All regional public facilities shall comply with the minimum off-street parking requirements contained in ECDC 17.50.030. a. All on -site parking lots shall be screened from adjacent residential properties with a solid wall or sight -obscuring fence not less than six feet in height. Such walls or fences may be built progressively as the parking facilities are installed. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with ECDC 20.13.025. b. Regional public facilities shall submit a transportation management plan for approval by the city. The plan shall address the following: traffic control, parking management, mitigation measures for overflow parking into adjoining residential areas, and traffic movement to the nearest arterial street. [ECDC 16.80.030.171 No changes to existing parking at City Park are proposed. 8. Orientation to Transportation Facilities. All regional public facilities must be located adjacent to or within 500 feet of a principal or major arterial street. [ECDC 16.80.030.G] Civic Park is not a regional public facility. 9. Transit. All regional public facilities shall be located within 1,500 feet of an existing transit center. At least one on -site transit stop or station shall be required. The transit stop or station shall include a turnout of suitable size and location to accommodate public buses. [ECDC 16.80.030.H] Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 6 3.A.1.a City Park is not a regional public facility. 10. Lighting. All exterior lighting shall be arranged and directed so as to direct the light away from adjacent residential uses. [ECDC 16.80.030.11 All exterior lighting shall be arranged and directed so as to direct the light away from adjacent residential uses. [ECDC 17.100.070.C] The Parks maintenance yard is not adjacent to residential uses. 11. Screening. Electrical substations, water/sewer pump stations, sewage treatment facilities, solid waste facilities, commuter parking lots, and maintenance and storage yards shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential properties with a solid wall or sight -obscuring fence not less than six feet in height. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 20.13 ECDC. [ECDC 16.80.030.J] City Park is not one of the listed facilities. V. VARIANCES A variance to any requirement in Titles 16 and 17 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (except use and procedural requirements) may be approved when the following findings can be made: A. Special Circumstances. That, because of special circumstances relating to the property, the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the some zoning. 1. Special circumstances include the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property, public necessity as of public structures and uses as set forth in ECDC 17.00.030 and environmental factors such as vegetation, streams, ponds and wildlife habitats. 2. Special circumstances should not be predicated upon any factor personal to the owner such as age or disability, extra expense which may be necessary to comply with the zoning ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to make more profitable use of the property, nor any factor resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of the same property, B. Special Privilege. That the approval of the variance would not be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the some zoning, C. Comprehensive Plan. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the comprehensive plan, D. Zoning Ordinance. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the zone district in which the property is located; Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 7 3.A.1.a E. Not Detrimental. That the variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and some zone,- F. Minimum Variance. That the approved variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the some zoning. Staff Analysis 1. Special circumstances. According to ECDC 17.00.030, all public structures and uses built or altered by the city or any public agency must comply with the zoning ordinance. However, a variance may be considered where it is a public necessity to build or alter a structure or use in a location or in a manner not complying with the ordinance. The location of the Parks maintenance yard is noted in the City Park Master Plan; the City Council's adoption of the master plan made the greenhouse improvements public necessities since they are needed to implement the approved vision for the park. 2. Special privilege. The two variances for the greenhouse and landscaping are based on public necessity and would not constitute special privilege. City Park and the maintenance yard are unique within Edmonds. 3. Comprehensive plan. Among many improvements, the replacement of the greenhouses was included in the City Park Master Plan, which is an adopted element of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Zoning ordinance. Without a variance, the new greenhouse would have to be set back at least 20 feet from street property lines in the Public (P) zone. Parks has applied for the subject variance to reduce the setback for the new greenhouse to 11' from the west street property line and 14' from the south street property line. Regarding landscaping, the Hearing Examiner may interpret and modify the requirements in landscaping chapter according to ECDC 20.13.000. Replacement of the greenhouse would typically require the installation of two trees within in the street setback area adjacent to the greenhouse but Parks is requesting flexibility to not replant or replant elsewhere. With conditions, the proposed changes are consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance (ECDC 16.00) and the Public (P) zone district (ECDC 16.80). 5. Not detrimental. The location of the proposed greenhouse is not detrimental because it moves the building further into the site relative to the west property line and maintains the existing setback from the south property line. While the new greenhouse would be somewhat more visible from the south (it would be 18 feet tall as opposed to about 8 feet), it would still be well screened by the Photinia hedge at Pine Street and since the maintenance yard is several feet below the level of the adjacent sidewalks at Pine and SR-104. As a point of reference, the existing Prop Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 8 3.A.1.a Building will remain and is almost completely screened by the hedge at 12' 6" in height (Exhibit 3). The existing hedge and need for unobstructed sunlight on the greenhouse makes strict compliance for tree replanting to meet the Type III landscaping requirements in ECDC 20.13 unnecessary. Replanting two trees elsewhere within the park is reasonable. 6. Minimum variance. A range of elements and options were considered for the park during the public process that led to the City Park Master Plan that was eventually adopted by City Council. The Parks Department has applied for the subject variance to reduce the setback for the new greenhouse from 20 feet to 11 feet from the west street property line and 14 feet from the south street property line. While the greenhouse could be located elsewhere within the maintenance yard and be code - compliant, replacing it in nearly the same location keeps the existing work flow and operation of the yard intact. By not installing additional trees around the greenhouse, the sun will still be able to reach the greenhouse and a block wall and improved drainage can be installed. Replanting two trees elsewhere on the site could improve landscaping within another area of City Park. VI. STAFF TECHNICAL COMMENTS In addition to the Planning Division, the City Building and Engineering Divisions reviewed the variance request. The Building Division noted that a building permit would be required for the new greenhouse. Engineering noted that the proposal appears to comply with the Public Works requirements in Title 18 and that will be verified with the building permit (Exhibit 7). Compliance with all applicable requirements and standards will be verified through the building permit application. If a building permit is approved, field inspections will verify compliance with plans during construction. VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis in and the attachments to this report, staff finds the proposal is consistent with the variance criteria of ECDC 20.85. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner should APPROVE the variance (PLN2022-0027) associated with the Edmonds City Park greenhouse project with the following conditions: 1. A building permit is required in order to install a new greenhouse and related improvements. 2. The greenhouse may be located a minimum of 11 feet from the west street property line and 14 feet from the south street property line. 3. The Parks Department must install two trees but they maybe located anywhere within City Park where additional vegetation would provide better screening at the exterior of the site. Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 9 3.A.1.a VIII. PARTIES OF RECORD Angie Feser, Director City of Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services 700 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds City Park Greenhouse Variance PLN2022-0027 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 10 3.A.1.a r)7C CITY OF EDMONDS 700 MAIN ST. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425)771-0230 • FAX (425)771-0253 MIKE NELSON PARKS, RECREATION AND Mayor CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT N, April 5, 2022 Site / Property Info: 1. Parcel ID: 27032600101300 2. Address: 600 3rd Avenue South 3. Zone: Public Use with Pine Street adjacent to the south and SR-104 adjacent to the west. 4. Critical areas: none known 5. Minimum Setback: 20' from a public street or other property line per ECDC 16.80.030 A. Introduction: The City of Edmonds is requesting approval of a variance in order to install a greenhouse within the 20- foot setback of Pine Street and SR-104 which will replace two aging greenhouses in the same location within the Parks maintenance yard. This also includes a request to waive the requirement to plant two trees in the Pine Street Setback or to plant them in an alternate location. All other requirements of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code will be met. This request includes the following 16.80.030 Site Development Standards for Public Use Zones, Section A. Minimum Setbacks. A minimum landscaped setback of 20 feet shall be maintained from a public street or other property lines. o The City is requesting to locate the proposed replacement greenhouse structure a minimum of 14' from the southern property line along Pine Street and 11' from the western property line along SR-104. 20.13.030 Landscape Types, Section C. Type Ill Landscaping. Intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. This includes evergreen or deciduous trees planted at 30' on -center. o The City is requesting to waive the requirement for the two required trees or to allow them to be planted in an alternate location. Exhibits: • Exhibit A: Site Plan. • Exhibit B: Greenhouse Building Elevations. Project Overview: This project consists of the demolition and removal of two existing greenhouse structures and the installation of one new greenhouse structure. The two existing greenhouse structures have been used beyond their intended lifespan and have several structural and functional issues as well as safety concerns. Additional improvements include installation of a low retaining wall approximately 7' from the property line and a french drain which will help to capture an overflow of stormwater runoff that comes onto the site from Pine Street. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City / Hekinan, Japan PLN2 Packet Pg. 11 3.A.1.a The plantings grown in the greenhouse are used in landscaped features located along street rights -of - way, intersections, and medians; at park entrances; and in approximately 155 hanging flower baskets throughout the City of Edmonds. These plantings contribute to a pedestrian friendly community, help provide character to public art elements, and are a key component in the identity of the City of Edmonds. The greenhouse and plantings grown here are invaluable to reaching the goals of several of the City's planning documents which contribute to the economic development of Downtown and other areas of Edmonds. • Per the 2015 Streetscape and Street Tree Plan, the city places a high value on its distinctive flower program and landscaping within the Downtown Business District and its reputation as an "Arts" community. The plants grown in the greenhouse serve not only the hanging flower baskets but also in planting areas throughout parks, Downtown, and other areas of the City. • Plantings, landscape, and the flower baskets are noted several times throughout the 2020 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. Per Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal D.3 the flower baskets are noted as a means of providing pedestrian -oriented amenities for citizens and visitors throughout the downtown/waterfront area. In addition, Goal E.5 notes that flower displays and gardens are amenities that will help to expand and enhance tourism and help fuel the local economy. • The 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan a goal is to continue to provide and maintain identity -enhancing features including the flower baskets throughout the public realm. Goal 7 of the PROS plan is to provide a high quality and efficient level of maintenance for all parks and related public assets in Edmonds. The greenhouses play a lead role is the ability for City staff to ensure this goal is met. Per the 2014 City of Edmonds Community Cultural Plan, Goal #1 is to reflect Edmonds' commitment to arts and culture through integration of the arts in the city's physical infrastructure, planning, image and brand. This has led to projects such as the renovation of the Hazel Miller Plaza, a sculptural art installation with the Floretum Garden Club adjacent to the Public Safety Building, and the new Welcome to Downtown Edmonds Sign. These, along with many other projects around Edmonds rely on the plantings grown at the greenhouse to provide context and character for their overall success. Proposed Greenhouse Structure: The proposed greenhouse will be approximately 1,200 square feet (48' x 24') and no greater than 24' tall from the existing finish grade in the maintenance yard. The two existing green houses are approximately 880 square feet collectively and this does not provide adequate space for growing plants due to the growing need for more plants and flower baskets. Adding approximately 320 square feet, the proposed greenhouse will allow more and safer working room for city staff. Additionally, many plants need to be stored outside in the winter and they need to be continuously rotated in and out of the 1 small, heated greenhouse. Having the additional space will mean that more plants can overwinter in the greenhouse which will lead to higher plant success rates and less staff time to rotate plants. The aging greenhouse structures are also an increasing safety risk to the staff. Stormwater runoff from Pine Street to the south regularly floods the greenhouses, the electrical connections from the existing propagation house are aging and in need of upgrades, and rodents are an increasing issue within the greenhouses. The ongoing maintenance of this structure is a hardship on city staff and, with a new greenhouse, staff will be able to carry out duties in a more efficient manner with less requirements for ongoing upkeep of the greenhouse structures. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City / Hekinan, Japan PLN2 Packet Pg. 12 3.A.1.a Variance Request: 1. Special Circumstances. The following special circumstances related to the property will deprive the City of the rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity: • The greenhouse serves a necessary function for the city by providing space for plantings and flower baskets to grow. These plantings are planted throughout the city, in parks, and other public spaces. The flower baskets are a key component to the character of the City of Edmonds and in meeting goals of several city planning documents listed herein. If the zoning must be strictly adhered to in this case, the resulting greenhouse will be too small to provide all of the plantings needed for the flower baskets and other plantings throughout the city. • This parcel, which is a part of City Park, is utilized as the Parks maintenance yard and is also used by Public Works. Two existing greenhouses are currently located in the same corner of the site as the proposed replacement greenhouse, and are approximately 14' from the southern property line and 5' from the western property line. This location in the southwest corner of the site has full sun exposure and is an ideal location for a greenhouse which requires full exposure to the southern sun. Other locations around the site were considered but, due to the deep shade condition created by numerous mature evergreen and deciduous trees, the greenhouse would not function properly if it were placed elsewhere on -site. • Alternative locations within the paved areas of the maintenance yard were also evaluated. The paved area serves a necessary function for the park maintenance yard and allows room for temporary storage, truck turnaround, and flexible working space on a daily basis. If the greenhouse were to be located within the paved area, the maintenance yard would lose the ability to use this functional space for park maintenance and daily operations. • This site is the only space in Edmonds that serves as a maintenance yard for the city's parks and public open spaces. It is a public necessity to maintain its functionality for the variety of activities that occur here in order to maintain and improve the City's parks and public open spaces. If trees are required to be planted south of the greenhouse, their canopies will eventually block the southern sun and negatively affect the functionality of the greenhouse which requires full sun exposure. All other plantings, shrubs, and groundcovers that are required within the setback will be provided. There is a 10' —15' tall Photinia hedge on the existing fence line that will provide screening of the greenhouse from Pine Street to the south. There is approximately 20' of existing, dense vegetation including trees on the west side of the site between the sidewalk and the existing fence that will provide full screening of the greenhouse from SR-104. 2. Special Privilege: The approval of the variance would not be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. The closest Public Use space to this site is the Wastewater Treatment Plant which was granted a similar setback variance as it is also a public necessity. Locating the replacement greenhouse where requested will allow the maintenance yard to serve its necessary purpose in maintaining and operating parks and ultimately help to meet the planning goals noted herein. Comprehensive Plan. The approval of this variance will be consistent with the 2020 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. Per the comprehensive plan, this parcel ("Edmonds City Park") is designated as a park. The greenhouse is located within the maintenance yard in the southwest corner of the park. The maintenance yard serves as a hub of operations for the Edmonds Park system and is a compatible use within the site. Based on the 2016 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, the maintenance yard and the greenhouse within the maintenance yard help to achieve the following goals: • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City / Hekinan, Japan PLN2 Packet Pg. 13 3.A.1.a i) Maintain parks and facilities to keep them safe, attractive and healthy and preserve them as assets for future generations. ii) Design parks and facilities for operational efficiency and to conserve energy, water, staff time, and other resources. Prioritize quality and durability of materials for all parks capital improvements. iii) Continue to provide and maintain identity -enhancing features such as art enhanced light poles, hanging flower basket poles, wayfinding signage, design elements and public art installations throughout the public realm. 4. Zoning Ordinance: The approval of the variance will be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the Public Use zone in which the parks maintenance yard is located. The maintenance yard and greenhouse are permitted secondary uses within the Public Use zone. 5. Not Detrimental. The variance, as approved or conditionally approved, will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and same zone. The proposed greenhouse will be sited in the same location as the two existing greenhouses and, if approved, will not affect the functionality of the site, property value, or scenic views of any adjacent properties. The greenhouse construction will be done in a safe manner and the structure will follow all safety standards and guidelines. The proposed greenhouse will increase safety for the city staff that currently work in the greenhouse. This will be achieved by allowing more space to safety work and transport plant materials in and out of the structure and by improving drainage around the structure so that it does not take on stormwater during significant storm events. No portion of this project will be physically injurious or harmful to any person on the property or surrounding properties. Allowing the two required trees to be waived or planted elsewhere will not be detrimental. Several other trees and dense vegetation provide screening and a natural character to the surrounding properties. 6. Minimum Variance. The approved variance is the minimum necessary. Allowing the greenhouse to be located 14' from the south property line and 11' from the west property line will enable to City to install a greenhouse at the ideal size for a fully -functional working space, and will allow the functionality of the paving area in the maintenance yard to maintain its current function. Based on careful site analysis, there are no other locations within the site where a replacement greenhouse can be located that would not negatively affect the functionality of the maintenance yard or prove to be too much shade on the greenhouse. The space between the greenhouse and the property line will be planted with shrubs and groundcovers per the required Type III Landscaping. Allowing the 2 required trees to be waived or planted elsewhere is a minimum variance. Sincerely, �GO.� Angg Feser Director of Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Department City of Edmonds • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City / Hekinan, Japan PLN2 Packet Pg. 14 DMONDS CITY PARK MASTER PLAN CITY OF EDMONDS PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION 1992 NAKANO ♦ DENNIS a _ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS . x 1pu� Packet Pg. 15 m EDMONDS CITY PANIC MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE ANALYSIS USER SURVEY DESIGN GOALS CIRCULATION CONCEPTS MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES MASTER PLAN CONSTRUCTION PHASING 0 MASTER PLANNING PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS PLN2 Packet Pg. 16 6 CLIENT City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation Division Community Services Department Project Manager Arvilla Ohlde 9 3-00MVEM Landscape Architect Nakano • Dennis, Landscape Architects Architect Kovalenko Architects Civil Engineer SvR Design Co. Transportation Engineer Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. Graphic Designer Gary Shinn Design Edmonds City Park has long been a community gathering place for family groups and company parties. Summer season and major national holidays see City Park crowded with an enthusiastic public. The park is being 'loved to death'. The park's well used facilities are in some cases undersized, in others worn. This master plan explores the special character- istics of City Park which need to be pre- served and the renovations and improve- ments that will serve the public's needs and protect the resources of the park for the future. ❑ DESIGN TEAM & 2 PROJECT INTRODU . Packet Pg. 17 i® 3.A.1.a F c L d N 7 O t ANALYSIS 'L^ V • While most of the site is less than 8% slope, within the range of handicapped accessible slopes, the lack of paved pathways makes most a of the park inaccessible to the handicapped. o Currently, handicapped access is limited to the Y new restroom facility and two parking spaces. a 0 • The site's steepest slopes are 50% and planted in lawn which is difficult to mow. 'a w • The poorly drained areas exist below the ga- 0 zebo. and in right field. ■ Gentle slopes create a natural amphitheater around the gazebo. W • Steep slopes separate the ballfield from the street and from the picnic area. _ o • The level areas of the site are well -utilized for 0 a picnics, parking, play, and maintenance. RECOMMENDATIONS ti N O O N N O Plant steepest slopes in ground cover. N z a f ■ Provide subdrainage in wet areas. E • Locate paved pathways for maximum accessi- bility. a ANALYSIS 4 PLN2 Packet Pg. 19 R• i A A A A A A A A. R A A A A A A A. Ik 10 .�gypp �" r1*;•1**fs A f►** � � rt**tY•:**a< � 3- *y 4***■►*►art**I**♦ar• a**Y i r****>I►f►*4****Uw .* WWO �•s**�a******Y �***4*r}*., ris, ht,*vlei rs ♦***�•� .�►*'. .�*! **sl *`19yit)**.}�* r**********�•* **X•********* a**��*�� r■ �; *:r*AfI>>ri#***t ;� Y' r***. jf *t ar.*Y; a`**;�s}t•*r *■:: �►***ti,`***><•* R �►#+rf*i►I►a`***I *****�►*.. . `■►■►***�/#*** rsi�... �:tyr-* *� t•**a?vstyr>fF 'I"t'YAA s►f_•**y� !; T:. �>Ir2*i►r►i►' **�►**/ A; rr a********f .►****'1 ♦ �r. * �rs►�.161*'r 4 * "'t A A A A Al■►�►. t . 26 `***f ♦**: �L a******s► , r***V A A ♦*Us A't At,aR :+R r�*�>►k ♦ .._'�'•_�.. :. .RsR* i ■ s` I..A AA A A A A AA_ .a�♦AA AAAA AA•*** ■ ****a`�***R *** r***f t i ' ****** 4;`****■.. - ♦** � ■ ****y****** %*a1� *****; f ****1 Y•**�! �A.1 ♦AAAAAAA AAA. ♦AAAAAAA Ali - - AAA **1 Q****t1 f ** I* *� { A A A A A A. + AAA• ♦ A• 11 -*�A*,* � AAA.* A A ry ***■►�►ri**' ■ �AN r `A:: ♦*****��**y ****r k** ► ►******ail****************■1 �]'•r. A A A r 4**t x�z ****i4 f***� s ************* A A A A i AAA AA, A 4 A 4 A A A A R R :Y. ■�*************A A A■ •AA!•11A.L A A A A A A A A A AA♦AAAA A4AA� • AA AA A AAAA -:A AAA A A A AL A A A A A A A A A A A AA AAAAAA44AAAAAAAA. -A.• _ ****fir**�*]►:r4 .AAA. •.A A_,. .. A.;♦ AA.:. A.. L/ • - • A w . . A AA 4 A A:, A AAA. AAA AAAAAAAA. Aw ■ Wo ■ / ■. NAKANO*DENNIS [] HYDROLOGY '•1 LANDSCAFE ARCHITECTS • ■ 05io203D so WN2 Packet Pg. 20 3.A.1.a ANALYSIS Most of the site has a canopy of well -estab- lished, mature conifers, and the primary use areas are lawn. Mature Big Leaf Maples grow at the north end of the park west of the ball field. Cherry trees flank the north and west side of the north parking lot. ■ The lawn is in good condition in most areas despite heavy park use. Lawn areas which are in poor condition are at service access routes and where drainage is inadequate. The conifers are mostly in good condition. Compaction of the root zone where parking occurs under trees is a negative impact to tree health. Age and other environmental stresses also are contributing to the decline of some trees. • Ivy growing in trees at Third Street creates a buffer between park and street but may dam- age the trees over time. ■ Grass growing on steep bank at east edge of ballfield is difficult to maintain. • Some of the Big Leaf Maples have been re- moved because of the danger of windfalls. An arborist evaluated the trees in Edmonds City Park for hazard and recommended pruning or removal of some maples and conifers. • Some trees are fire -damaged along main entry drive. ■ Some trees are in decline due to age. • Mature trees create some well-defined spaces between tree masses and below tree canopy. There is poor screening of the park on the west edge. Traffic on SR-104 is visible and audible from the park and between the park and sur- rounding streets. There is poor visual separation of the mainte- nance area from the park proper. Employee parking overflows into the park. The plant buffer between the park and the maintenance yard is sparse. ■ There is poor visual separation of parking from the play and lawn areas. There is poor visual and physical separation of the new parking area from the roadway. ■ The maintenance facility yard is partially vis- ible from Pine Street. Some shrub plantings provide screening. • Much of the site is shaded by tree canopy. In most areas there are enough marginal breaks in the canopy to create light for growing lawn and provide sun for activities. • Present locations of play area and wading pool are shaded for much of the day. ■ Park signage marks the park entry, but the entry point is not emphasized spatially. RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Site development in the park to preserve the maximum number of mature healthy trees. • Prohibit traffic and parking by public and maintenance staff vehicles under canopies of trees. • Remove ivy from tree trunks as necessary to protect the health of the trees. • While preserving the wooded character of the park, it may be necessary to selectively prune and thin trees to preserve sufficient light levels for lawn growth and activities. ■ Insure the future of the wooded area by adding young climax species conifers to diversify the age of the trees stand. ■ Replace grass on steep bank east of ballfield with appropriate ground cover. ■ Provide paved service access routes. ■ Remove all hazard trees and branches, un- healthy trees, and fire -damaged trees. ■ Shrub plantings could be used in the park to define and separate spaces within the park. • The maintenance functions should be pulled back from Pine Street and screened from the street with plantings. ■ The removal of some trees at the park entry could help define the entry point. Removal of trees would also create a more gradual transi- tion from bright sun to dense shade thus reduc- ing visibility problems for motorists entering the park. Relocate play area and wading pool to sunnier location. ❑SITE 11-1-1 ANALYSIS PLN2 Packet Pg. 21 KEY LIMIT OF PRIMARY OPEN SPACES VEGETATION MASS AFTERNOON SHADE PATTERN EDMONDS CITY PARK I � / Z' -�— so- 50� 40 I j � r 1 SR 104 J �IXJAL SEPARATION .��. wow m rpAor m - -.- vs., NEEDS BL'rM DEFINATION J 3RD AVE S } \ G 1 > POOR VISUAL SEPARATION d PARK FROM SR104 In N N 7 0 t c d 'L^ V POOR VISUAL SEPARATION C _ OF PARKING AREA FROM AREA E 0 U) L \ N 0� \ w \ W O r � U � N \ w� SLOPED W= 'E BALLFIEID \ r k POOR VISUAL ARATI ON OF PARK AREA OM 0 CL APARTMENT COM7 , ` ) \ STEEP SLOPE DEFINES EDGE OF BALLFIEID 1 NAKANO*DENNIS VEGETATION, SUN/SHADE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS❑SPATIAL CHARACTER 05102030 SD 70PL Packet Pg. 22 3.A.1.a ANALYSIS • One-way direction of main vehicle route is not always respected particularly between the entry and new restroom parking area. • Existing parking is insufficient for high -use summer season. Existing parking lots are not paved and not striped. The existing parking lot area may not be accommodating as many cars as possible due to improper parking. • The new parking lot and the parking at the new restrooms have broad openings on the road- way. Safety is compromised by poorly defined circulation routes. • Overflow parking of service vehicles and pri- vate vehicles is not contained in appropriate areas. Direct and indirect damage to trees can result when parking occurs in wooded areas. Bark and roots may be damaged by contact with vehicles. Compaction of the root zone under trees interferes with root growth and function which can contribute to decline of tree health. • Parking lots do not have close, direct connec- tion to kitchens and baseball field. • Proximity of play area to main vehicle route is dangerous. Regular service vehicle traffic is a potential conflict with public traffic circulation, espe- cially at maintenance facility entry drive and where service vehicles park at side of public road. • The existing unpaved service vehicle route through the picnic areas becomes rutted and muddy, and is not compatible with the use of the area. • There are no existing paved pedestrian paths to offer walking or jogging routes through the park. • No pedestrian path system exists through the wooded area at the south portion of the site. The wooded area might be considered over - utilized for cars and under-utilized by people. ■ Park driveway exit location is hazardous be- cause of proximity to driveway of neighboring apartments. • Metal rails at edges of roadways and parking areas prevent driving out of designated areas in some places. These are an aesthetic intrusion on the site, but are now necessary for vehicle control and road delineation. RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Create a two-way drive providing public access to the parking lots. • Pave and stripe parking for maximum effi- ciency. • Add curbs to entry road to discourage parking in wooded and turf areas. Remove metal rails at roadways only after curbs are installed to define road edges. • Improve traffic safety of drives, parking lots, entry, and exits through improved traffic sign- ing and permanent markings. This could be implemented as a quick, low-cost, interim measure prior to implementing any major park improvements. • Design and maintain landscaping and vegeta- tion such that adequate sight distance are provided at road intersections, on curves, and at pedestrian crossings. • Provide a separate entry for service area where it does not intersect with traffic in the park. • Provide for service vehicle and emergency access into the park from at least three well - separated locations on the park perimeter. • Create a paved pedestrian path system, handi- capped accessible wherever possible. • Design the major pedestrian path to be driveable, to provide service and emergency vehicle access within the park. • Supervised parking may be necessary for big events to prevent illegal parking and establish new habits for City Park users. Shuttle buses from park and ride lots -for holiday events might ease parking pressures. s ❑SITE . ANALYSIS PLN2 Packet Pg. 23 11 i]►VA 101►l1R 3.A.1.a ANALYSIS • The park is popular and well -used for a range of activities. • Heavy use of the park during special events creates some problems: insufficient restroom facilities, insufficient parking capacity, traffic congestion, and wear of turf areas. • Public Works And Parks Department mainte- nance facilities are located in the park. Mainte- nance activities are not fully compatible with park and neighborhood functions. • The plants for Edmonds' flower program are currently raised at the maintenance facility greenhouses. ■ The most heavily -used area is the children's play area adjacent to the parking lot. This area gets year-round use. The play equipment is in poor condition due to age. The location adja- cent to the road creates potential problems. • Kitchen and picnic facilities are fully rented in good weather for parties. Kitchens are in poor condition due to age. Some kitchens are lo- cated inconveniently far from parking areas. • Baseball/softball field is fully rented in spring and summer. The field is not adult regulation size. • Chemical storage facilities do not meet current safety standards, are in poor condition, and are in inappropriate locations. • Composting area is in the public use area of the park. RECOMMENDATIONS Upgrade and expand restroom and parking facilities to accommodate heavy park use. • Upgrade and expand picnic facilities to ad- dress heavy demand; however, balance any increase in picnic facilities with increased parking capacity and restroom facilities. • Locate picnic areas and play areas close to parking, ideally without roadways intervening. • Move compost into fenced maintenance area and away from neighboring homes. • Move chemical storage into the fenced mainte- nance area. • The flower program propagation operation could become an interesting and attractive public tour if the greenhouse facilities were upgraded. Program staff support would be necessary to implement public tours, • If a replacement ballfield were constructed elsewhere in the Edmonds Park System to accommodate league play currently scheduled at Edmonds City Park, the ballfield could be rented to groups using picnic facilities or for other informal games. • Public Works is in the process of relocating. A site at 2nd & Dayton is a site under consider- ation for relocation of Parks Department Main- tenance. The relocation of maintenance is recommended because the maintenance activi- ties are not aesthetically or functionally com- patible with the neighborhood or the park. While maintenance remains in the park, miti- gate the presence of maintenance functions on the park and neighborhood by relocating all maintenance activities, equipment, supplies, and parking within the fenced maintenance area. Screen maintenance area from park and surrounding streets with plantings. The relocation of the Parks Department Main- tenance Facilities would allow the maintenance area to be converted to another park use. The area could become passive lawn and plantings, picnic areas, or a parking lot. Alternatively the site could be occupied by a new building or a remodeled maintenance building for use as a farmer's market, classrooms, meeting rooms, banquet hall, dance hall, or pottery studio. Frisbee golf is not a suitable activity for this site because of the damage from frisbees to under - story plant material. In addition, it is not compatible with pedestrian use of the woods. The user survey indicates that it is infrequently used. A location more appropriate for this activity could be identified in the Comp Plan currently under study. Substitute a water spray feature for the wading pool. The Health Department requirements for fencing of the pool are aesthetically incompat- ible with the park atmosphere and the cost of maintenance and supervision for a pool is prohibitive. The substitution of a spray feature offers a similar play experience without the drawbacks of a pool. io SITE ANALYSIS PLN2 Packet Pg. 25 55- - - r f SR 104 gl�J� VICE EQUIPMENT PICNIC P G STORAGE x\ \ TO E CHEMIC MARSH V o Z so G c PAR Al NANCE x L G USES OFFICE \ PARKING I 50� SHOP _ x D — \� CHILDREN'S E C CAL sTa c . \PLAY AREA . CH`9N �- CLEAN \ a' \ P C C l x Y �x 0c. x N \ d . 55— \ \ IC I \ a CHEN \ E PiC C FRISBEE GOLF \ ` / ` ~W AC VICE OVERFLOW `\ \ C E S N 2ND AVE S \ D O \ PARKING\ 10 \GAZ S �o— — x O IN� HHQQ HO ESHOE CODERT r r \ \ \ CLA55 \ PARTIES \ \ \ \ \ WEDDI _ 75 \ SPECTATORS \ ` o \ \ \ \ ❑ E5 MS BALLFIELD \ \ G `\ CONCERTS \ \ N CD _ N E D M O N D 5 ` j TER j 3RD AVE S J J EXIT E CITY PARK la a 3 NAKANO*DENNIS Uu—L F— DACTIVITIES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 05102030 $BLISI� Packet Pg. 26 3.A.1.a 1 PARKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING 'Me- structure is a wood -frame building with cedar shake roofing and plywood siding. The building is currently shared with Public Works. It is around 3,840 square feet, and includes a wood shop, mower storage and repair shop, paint booth, offices, lunchroom, and staff restrooms. The facilities are adequate for current needs of grounds maintenance, but inadequate shared with Buildings Division. However, due to overdue maintenance, substantial renovation may be required, including roofing, painting, and floor- ing. Existing windows are single -pane aluminum. The siting of a maintenance facility on prune park land should be evaluated in long range planning for City Park. 2A, 2B, 2C GREENHOUSES The greenhouses were designed as temporary structures and are already more than ten years old. They are constructed from PVC pipe ribs with plastic sheeting and wood foundations. Each has irrigation. They are apparently functional. However, the total area of the greenhouses is about 2,000 square feet and, according to staff, is around 1,000 square feet smaller than ideal. The greenhouses could be part of a demonstration garden open to the public but would need to be rebuilt in a more durable, vandal proof, perma- nent fashion. 3 POTTING SHED The potting shed is attached to one of the three greenhouses. It is constructed from light wood framing and translucent corrugated fiberglass roofing and siding. It is in need of maintenance, possibly including replacement of fiberglass roofing and siding. The potting shed may need to be rebuilt if the greenhouses are opened to the public. 4 STORAGE BUILDING This is a small, wood -frame building with a low- pitched, built-up roof, plywood siding, and con- crete block foundation. It is around 600 square feet, and is currently used for paper products and supply storage. It has been reasonably well main- tained, but it is a utilitarian, undistinguished structure. Its location at the edge of the current park is a potential aesthetic concern. At a mini- mum, painting and roofing will be required. 5 NEW RESTROOM The new restroom was built about three years ago. It is constructed of split -faced, concrete block walls with a sloped, cedar -shake roof. It is functional, serviceable, and handicapped accessible, but it is undistinguished architecturally. Its location is perhaps too distant from the main activity areas, parking, etc. It is 16 ft. x 26 ft., and its size can accommodate approximately 300 people for pic- nicking or 200 for baseball or concerts (per Uni- form Plumbing Codes Appendix Q. Reroofing and paint will be required, and the toilet partitions need to be replaced. 6 OLD RESTROOM The old restroom is constructed of common -faced concrete block walls and sloped, cedar -shake roof. It appears to be structurally sound, but it has many problems. The floors do not slope to drain; plumbing fixtures and piping need replacement; the sewer has to be pumped to the main and apparently is a frequent problem. Minimally, the toilet partitions and the roof need to be replaced, and the interior and exterior need painting. Re- placement is probably a more cost effective alter- native to renovation because of the very poor condition of this facility. The electrical service is overhead wire. The restrooms are 20 ft. x 32 ft. and sized to accommodate approximately 600 people for picnicking or about 400 for baseball and concerts (per Uniform Plumbing Code Appendix Q. 7A, 7B, 7C KITCHENS/PICNIC SHEL- TERS The kitchen rental facilities are extremely popular and often serve groups of up to 300 people. The roofs and roof structures were replaced recently. However, they have cracked chimneys and fire- places, cracked and settled floors, rotten posts and beams. The sinks, plumbing, and countertops need replacement. The lighting is poor and the electrical service is overhead wire. It is unclear where the kitchen wastewater goes. They are located too far from the parking areas. They should be completely rebuilt and provided with proper drains and underground wiring. The gazebo was constructed in 1981. It is occa- sionally used for weddings or live music concerts. It has a basement that is unused because of water leaks. It is wood -framed in an octagon configura- tion with a pitched, cedar -shake roof. There is some dry rot, the roof needs replacement, the guardrails need substantial repair, and all exposed wood surfaces need to be stained. 9 FERTILIZER STORAGE BUILDING The fertilizer storage building was the original park 's maintenance building. It is approximately 200 square feet. Its location inside the park is a potential hazard. It is wood -frame construction and is badly deteriorated. It should be demol- ished. Fertilizer storage should be located inside the maintenance facility. 10 CHEMICAL STORAGE BUILDING The chemical storage building is a small concrete block structure with a flat root. It is approxi- mately 160 square feet. Its location inside the park is a potential hazard. Because of its small size and deteriorated condition, it should be demolished. Chemical storage should be located inside the maintenance facility. 11 NEW PICNIC SHELTERS Two wood and concrete shelters with views of the marsh across SR 104 are relatively new and in good condition. 12 ❑SITE . ANALYSIS PLN2 Packet Pg. 27 3.A.1.a KEY 1 PARKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING 2A, 2B, 2C GREENHOUSES 3 POTTING SHED 4 STORAGE BUILDING 5 NEW RESTROOM 6 OLD RESTROOM 7A, 7B, 7C KITCHENS/PICNIC SHELTERS 8 GAZEBO 9 FERTILIZER STORAGE BUILDING 10 CHEMICAL STORAGE BUILDING 11 NEW PICNIC SHELTERS ss— � EDMONDS CITY PARK 1 SR 104 3RD AVE S J J m 0 c d d 'L^ y L m L R N Y L m a c- 0 E w 4- 0 r N x w . 0 w 0 a RAJ 0) ti N �- O O N N R O N L Z � d 33 a 0 NAKANO*DENNIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE oswsoso soa��g2 Packet Pg. 28 3.A.1.a ANALYSIS DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE The Edmonds City Park is located within the City of Edmonds Water and Sewer District. The park is served by a 4-inch water service extending off a 4- inch cast iron main in 3rd Avenue South. The 4- inch cast iron line serves the maintenance facilities with potable water and a fire hydrant in the south- west corner of the park. In addition, a 2-inch galvanized line serves all other facilities and irriga- tion lines within the loop road. SANITARY SEWER A trunk sewer line varying from 24 to 30 inches extends from south to north through the site, terminating at the City of Edmonds wastewater treatment plant. Because the existing sewer line is higher than both the old restroom and the mainte- nance buildings, pumps are required. The grinder pump that serves the old restroom becomes over- taxed during the summer months, periodically failing. A chemical storage unit for collecting residue chemicals from equipment cleanup is located at the maintenance building. ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE Electrical service is provided by the Snohomish Public Utility Department. With the exception of two underground cables serving the new restroom and old restroom, the power lines are aerial on wooden poles. Telephone service is provided by G.T.E. There is currently no cable television serv- ing the site. RECOMMENDATIONS • The two localized drainage problems restrict activities in these areas. Subsurface drain sys- tems or catch basins in these areas would solve this problem. • The pump system at the old restroom is inad- equate for the volume generated during the summer season and should be. replaced. The overhead power cables detract from the overall visual quality of the Park. Power should be undergrounded when renovation or new development occurs. 9 STORM DRAINAGE The entire park site is drained into a drainage swale running north/south along SR 104 at the western perimeter of the park. Two problem spots within the park have been identified. The first is located to the southwest of the gazebo. A perfo- rated drain pipe system is laid perpendicular to the slope in this area, but appears to be functioning poorly, resulting in wet, saturated soils that are unusable during the rainy months. The second problem area is to the southeast of the ballfields where soil drainage is inadequate resulting in wet, boggy conditions. Runoff from the loop road is collected through a series of catch basins, and discharges to the SR 104 swale. The existing chan- nel discharges into an underground pipe system to the east of the wading pool. ❑ SITE 14 ANALYSIS PLN2 Packet Pg. 29 KEY SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER __------- PERFORATED PIPE CONCRETE TROUGH WATER - - --- -- - - - -- - . ELECTRICAL (AERIAL uNLEss NOTED) DRAINAGE SWALE Ow MAN HOLE p CATCH BASIN • AREA DRAIN p WATER SOURCE 0 POWER POLE 60- 1 / I ' SR 104 cn 55 IRRXG TION Y ! O 50 / SERVICE RAMP I ! C w ! DRINKING FOUNTAINCREW L CLEANOUr i ' [a! r • i f ! 1s fA ■ r r. O — , E LLJ Y OPEN �D r 2NDAVE 5 UNTAIN r+ W 75 \ \ O o 1 N \ \ CD O \ \ r IN, '' ~1 \ 04 O _ IRRIGATION y J `a EDMONDS 3RD AVE S 1MR w CITY- �� PARK NAKANO*DENNIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS UTILITIES OSIO2030 M-1 Packet Pg. 30 3.A.1.a USER SURVEY FOR EDMONDS CITY PARK Edmonds Parks Department has contracted with a consultant to prepare a Master Plan for Edmonds CITY PARK to guide future design direction for the park, to prioritize improvements to the park, and to give focus to fundraising for park improvements. Answers to the following questions will aid the Parks Department and the consultant to make design choices which best serve the needs of park users. Please return the surveys by January 15 in the enclosed return envelopes. If you wish to offer further input, a public presentation will be held at the Planning Board Meeting in the Plaza Room on Main Street on January 22 at 7:00 P.M. 1. What park facilities do you currently use? How often? OftenSometimesNever Ballfield O O O Horseshoe Pits O O - O Frisbee Golf O O O Picnic Shelters (Kitchens) O O O Small Shelters at Lower Parking O O O Gazebo O O O Wading Pool O O O Fenced Play Area at Parking Lot O O O Play Equipment Below Ballfield O O O Woods O O O Lawn Area O O O Parking Lot at Play Area O O O Lower Parking Lot O O O Handicapped Parking O O O New Restroom O O O Restroom Below Ballfield O O O Picnic Tables O O O Bench Seating O O O 2. What improvements or changes to the existing facilities or park layout would you like to see? 3. What new facilities do you think would be appropriate additions to City Park? 4. What facilities do you think should be removed and why? 5. What special characteristics of City Park are important to preserve? 6. What special events at City Park, e.g., concerts, do you now participate in? 7. Do you have any other comments relevant to City Park? TABULATED SURVEY RESULTS 1. Current uses in order of most to least frequently used 1 Fenced Play Area Next to Parking Lot 2 Wading Pool 3 Picnic Shelters (Kitchens) 4 Parking Lot at Play Area 4 Picnic Tables 4 Play Equipment Below Ballfield 5 Bench Seating 6 New Restroom 7 Ballfield 7 Gazebo 8 Restroom Below Ballfield 8 Lawn Area 9 Lower Parking Lot 10 Woods 10 Small Shelters at Lower Parking Lot 11 Frisbee Golf 12 Horseshoe Pits 13 Handicapped Parking 2. Improvements: Improve or add kitchens Drain wet lawn areas Improve or replace restrooms Upgrade play equipment 3. New facilities: Paved area for bicycling, skating etc. Volleyball court and net Other ideas: putting green, swimming pool, fire rings, petting zoo, Pay phone 4. Remove: Maintenance buildings and functions 5. Special characteristics: Trees Play Area Lawn 6. Special events: 65% of respondents participate 7. Comments: Increase sunlight at children' play area Improve visibility Improve weekend maintenance Praise for maintenance Clean up dog waste at 3rd Ave. 16 ❑USER SURVEY & SURVEY RESULTSPLN2 Packet Pg. 31 3.A.1.a DESIGN GOALS The site analysis, the user survey, public comment, the goals of Edmonds Parks and Recreation Divi- sion, and the input from the Edmonds Planning Board all provide design direction to the master planning process. The following goals have been identified for incorporation into Master Plan Alternatives. • Provide a paved pedestrian path system which maximizes handicapped access and which can serve as emergency and maintenance access. • Extend pedestrian circulation into the wooded area at the south end of the park and control auto use of the wooded area. • Upgrade the structures on the site. Locate picnic shelters and restrooms for the best Possible functional relationships to park func- tions. • Provide direct, safe, convenient connections between parking areas and park use areas. • Revise the auto circulation to improve safety and address aesthetic considerations. • Preserve the mature stand of trees wherever possible. ■ Revise play area and water play area to in- crease sun exposure, to improve safety, and to address utility needs. • Retain the ballfield in its current location. Improve service and pedestrian access to the field. Add subdrainage improvements in righ field. Replace lawn with ground cover on steep slopes flanking the ballfield. ■ Provide a pedestrian path to SR104 for connec tion to the wetlands preserve. DESIGN ❑ 11-1-11 PLN2 Packet Pg. 32 GOALS 3.A.1.a ALTO CIRCULATION CONCEPTS A, primary factor in determin- ing the configuration of the final Master Plan for City Park is the location of parking areas and the auto circulation concepts. Four alternatives were studied. After evalua- tion of the four concepts the most favored alternative was incorporated into Master Plan Alternatives. N 1 2. DAVES - s n 1 SR 104 i SR 104 J CONCEPT A This plan retains the one way circulation pattern, but improves on pedestrian connections by pulling the roadway to the outside of the north parking lot. This allows the public to enter the park from that lot without crossing auto traffic. The advan- tage of this plan is that it is inexpensive to imple- ment. The disadvantages are that it does not address some of the safety problems identified in the site analysis and does not address the lack of separation of the park area from the adjacent residential use to the north. CONCEPT B This plan proposes a new two way auto entry from Pine Street. The advantages of this plan are that the 3rd Ave side can become an exclusively pedestrian entry, that the amount of roadway in the park is minimized, and that the new alignment offers easy access to a new parking lot at the Main- tenance area. The disadvantage of this alternative is that the traffic congestion at Pine Street on heavy ferry traffic days would interfere with public entry into the park. D CIRCULATION 18 CONCEPTS PLN2 Packet Pg. 33 3.A.1.a CONCEPT C This circulation system includes a two way road which enters the site at the location of the existing entry. Parking lots are proposed at two locations which correspond roughly to the existing parking areas thus taking advantage of existing clearings. This plan's primary disadvantage is that the widened roadway will entail some tree removal. The advantages are increased traffic safety and better separation of the park area from the apart- ments north of the site. This concept was adopted and incorporated into the Master Plan Alterna- tives and the Master Plan. The plan addresses safety concerns identified in the Site Analysis, allows space for a planted buffer from the resi- dential complex north of the park, and offers safe convenient park access at a location traditional for this park. b CONCEPT D This concept is included as a planning option for the future. If at some time in the future, the ferry traffic is re-routed, SR104 would not be so con- gested and would offer another entry option for the park. That entry could serve the parking locations of the adopted Concept C. Entry from SR104 would significantly reduce auto presence in the site and create a continuous park space more conducive to pedestrian flow through park spaces. 0 q- R SR I04 1 -a CIRCULATION ❑ CONCEPTS PLN2 Packet Pg. 34 3.A.1.a ALTERNATIVE A • Maintenance moves to another location and that area of the park becomes a community center with parking and landscaped grounds. • The children's play area and wading pool are renovated in their existing locations. • The picnic shelter facilities are expanded into the sunny lawn area north of the existing picnic area now occupied by swing sets. • A new restroom is constructed adjacent to the play area and the restroom at the picnic area is rebuilt. • A lawn amphitheater is created by improving drainage and regrading. A stage platform is added at the base of the slope. • A wetland garden is planted at the wet area around the existing water channel. • The gazebo is remodelled as a picnic shelter/kitchen EDMONDS CITY PARK NAKANO*DENNIS ❑ ALTERNATIVE A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN 051 33a SO 70 1 PLN Packet Pg. 35 on ALTERNATIVE B • The Maintenance Facility remains in the park with new greenhouses forming a visual and community focus. • The wooded area is underplanted with native and shade plantings as a horticultural and ecological display garden. A trail system protects the plantings from foot traffic and provides access to the woodland and garden. • The children's play area and a water spray feature are located in the sunny clearing north of the existing picnic area. • A large restroom near the location of the old restroom serves both the picnic and play areas. • The gazebo is remodelled as a kitchen or as a concession. • The number of picnic shelter/ kitchen facilities are increased and are located in open areas in the vicinity of the existing shelters. • A lawn amphitheater is created by improving drainage and regrading. A stage platform is added at the base of the slope. EDMOND S CITY PARK 3.A.1.a NAKANO*DENNIS ALTERNATIVE B LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ❑ PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN F-Lj�­' asrvz' aao LR2 Packet Pg. 36 3.A.1.a PEDESTRIAN PATH SYSTEM The Master Plan provides a paved system of paths which will allow handicapped access through much of the site and to all of the programmed opportunities. The path system will also serve as a maintenance vehicle route and in some cases an emergency vehicle access route. The paved pedes- trian paths are 8' wide or wider in most parts of the park and are sufficiently wide to accommodate service vehicles. An unpaved trail system will improve access to the wooded south portion of the site. MAINTENANCE DIVISION The Master Plan shows all maintenance functions moved into the fenced maintenance area. This will address aesthetic issues raised in public meetings and will preserve the wooded area for public use. The chemical storage facilities in the park should be moved out of public areas and upgraded to meet code requirements. At some future time the southwest corner of the site now occupied by maintenance could be converted to a public use. The area could have a community center building to house classes, banquets, meet- ings, dances, etc. with adjacent parking and landscape areas. The building could be new or the existing building could be renovated. The area could also be a farmers market, a passive park area with picnic tables, or overflow parking for the park. Until the Maintenance Department moves to another site the aesthetic impact to the park and neighborhood is reduced by plantings and the physical impact is reduced by creating a separate entry for the maintenance area and by moving all maintenance activities and parking into the fenced area. AUTO CIRCULATION Public auto access into the site and on site parking are useful for loading picnic supplies to the shel- ters, for handicapped access to park activities, for getting children easily to the play area, and for general ease of access. The proposed scheme preserves on site auto circulation for convenience of park users. The two way scheme improves traffic safety and emergency vehicle access. The entry is relocated to align with Erben Drive for safety reasons. The entry drive curves slightly which has the effect of slowing traffic. The two way roads are 24' wide and have curbs and gut- ters. Inside turning radii are minimum 25' to accommodate Fire Department vehicles. Alterna- tive emergency access is possible from 3rd Ave S north of the ballfield and from Pine Street through the Maintenance area. These entries are not pub- licly accessible and are controlled with bollards or gates. Crosswalks are striped and signed for safety. PARKING The parking plan increases on site parking from 85 existing stalls to 118 proposed stalls. The existing parking is not sufficient for high demand summer park use. In addition, expanded park facilities shown in the Master Plan will require additional parking facilities. The drawback of meeting this demand is that a large proportion of park land would be parking. Because the construction of the Master Plan is phased, there may be an opportu- nity to reduce park lot size if further study indi- cates that the number of stalls allowed is more than necessary. The new road and parking areas are paved, have curbs and gutters, and are striped. Parking lots are located to directly serve the pri- mary active park use areas and to preserve exist- ing tree groves. The parking scheme is related to active program elements in the park. One parking stall is allowed for each 8 fixed picnic seats (40 stalls); 50 stalls are allowed for the ballfield; 25 stalls are allowed for the play area and water feature; and 3 stalls are allowed for horseshoes for a total of 118 stalls. A parking study undertaken during the summer season would clarify parking needs for Edmonds City Park. BALLFIELD There is a long historic precedent of baseball on this site and there is strong demand for this field. However, because the field is not regulation size league play might be best scheduled elsewhere. If, at sometime in the future, another site for league play is built, this field could be reserved for family groups picnicking at the park. Plant masses com- posed of shrubs and trees will screen and protect the play area from stray balls. SPECIALTY GARDENS The wet area in the vicinity of the existing stream channel is a wetland garden. The wetland garden could be kept wet by directing drainage water from the amphitheater slope to this area. This area would be planted with moisture loving plants like his and Red -twig Dogwood. A boardwalk and platform will provide access and seating in this area and serve as a stage for the amphitheater. The boardwalk could be used as handicapped seating for staged events. The other specialty garden is the Woodland Arboretum. In the exist- ing woodlands new native understory or orna- mental shade tolerant plants would enhance the existing stand of mature trees. GAZEBO The Gazebo is not frequently used. The Master Plan reprograms this building as a Kitchen and Picnic Shelter for more effective use. A new access path with a'bridge' to the upper side of the build- ing would allow handicapped access AMPHITHEATER A regraded lawn bowl with subdrainage would function both as a passive landscape area and as an amphitheater for concerts and events. The wetland garden forms an attractive background for the stage. The stage also functions as a seating platform. HORSESHOES Horseshoes is relocated to a sunnier location more convenient to parking. The program for Edmonds City Park is derived from four sources: the site's constraints and opportunities revealed by the site analysis, community input from written survey and public meetings, direction received from the Edmonds Department of Parks and Recreation, and recommendations from the Edmonds Planning Board. All the sources indicate that much of the current program for Edmonds City Park is appropriate. A few current program elements were identified as inappropriate. A few current program element needed clarification, relocation, enhancement, or minor changes. A few program elements are new to this site. The Master Plan maintains the passive , naturalistic character of the park while addressing problems related to an active program and heavy park use. O MASTER ii PLAN PLN2 Packet Pg. 3771 i I i°'r SR104 TO ss f7ti _/. F'A°S N <i Employeec�snd so ss — rA k/� � �11111[II[Illllll L.i : � r � •I � �I � l � i �•��� �� _ ti ! , [ I Illllllllll� � �4 � - _ F � ..., � � �A p �- �. frR.��l�l��� j#� ■�U%lam► � - w = -"' N. O 2ND AVE S N,�- , ��%ge QAmp theaker — x •`_ O LLJ ~ f \•- • r _ • _• ��� Ilkifll � � O \ ive & Shade\ - V _ •— den BaUfield .i �` 1 Dove & } O Access 04 04 \\N� i \�i 3RD AVE S EDMONDS CITY - \ �° F-� F-i F1 F zo PARK NAKANOODENNIS MASTER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS [:j PLAN onFL Packet P . 38 9 r LVV/ LJ6Vbi Restroom Plan Scale 1/8"=V-0" Restroom North Elevation Scale 1/8"=V-0" NORTH .41W Metal Roof Wood Board and Batten Siding Local Stone ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER The architectural vocabulary recalls traditional rustic architecture typical of the Civilian Con- servation Corps projects. These buildings were characterized by log and pole construc- tion, use of native stone and rough sawn wood, and simple pitched roof forms. This style fits with the heavily wooded site's tradi- tional naturalistic landscape character. The tradition is updated to include materials such as metal roofing which is more easily main- tained than the traditional shake roof. The stone walls of greenhouse and lath house buildings tie those buildings the traditional rustic architectural style of the other buildings, while the glass and lath derive from a func- tional aesthetic. RESTROOMS The new restroom proposed by the Master Plan is larger than the existing restroom to meet demand in this highly attended park. Its location is handicapped accessible and cen- trally located relative to the currently highest use park functions: play area, picnic area, and ballfield. It also incorporates a storage area for use by maintenance staff. Restroom-West Elevation Scale 1/8"=V-0" ?d MASTER PLAN PLN2 Packet Pg. 39 3.A.1.a GREENHOUSES The existing greenhouses are in poor condi- tion and need replacement. The Master Plan suggests that new greenhouses become a feature of the park and that tours or open hours be offered to allow the public access to the growing operation for the Edmonds City Park flower program. The associated lathhouse is a focus point, a meeting place, an outdoor classroom, and an entry to the Arbo- retum. The greenhouses will include a small office and restroom for use of staff. That will allow the greenhouses to continue to function well after a time when Maintenance Division leaves the park site. When Maintenance vacates their current location the loading dock area could become a formal courtyard entry garden for the greenhouse/lathhouse com- plex, a fitting neighbor to a community center or a passive park area. PICNIC SHELTER/KITCHENS As with the ballfield, there is long historic precedent for picnics in Edmonds City Park. The existing shelters are fully rented in the summer season and the survey indicates that this is a popular activity. The Master Plan shows three new shelters similar in size to the three existing shelter, one larger shelter, and the remodeled Gazebo. Local Si Wood Lath Roof 18" o Peeler Poles Local Stone Park Entrance -East Elevation Scale 1/8"=1'-0" Lath House & Greenhouse -North Elevation Scale 1 /8"=1'-0" Picnic Shelter -North Elevation Scale 1/8"=1'-0" M Poles Greenhouse Glazing Floor Level Picnic Shelter -East Elevation Scale 1/8"=1'-0" MASTER PLAN PLN2 Packet Pg. 40 3.A.1.a EDMONDS CITY PARK Public Information KIOSK A kiosk is located at the corner of the south parking lot. This would serve as a historic interpretive marker and as a community bulletin board. Its con- struction materials and form tie it to the other architectural features of the park. WATER FEATURE The wading pool is replaced by a water spray feature in the Master Plan. Interactive water features are now available which offer varied and stimulating play opportunities and serve as points of visual interest as well. This feature could be designed to have play value without water as a climbing structure in winter months. PLAY AREA The play area is the most heavily used feature of the park and the Master Plan treats this as an important ele- ment in the new design. It is relocated to improve the sun exposure, to pro- vide a safer relationship to auto circu- lation, and to provide ready access to restrooms. Features which tie the site to the character of the local commu- nity or to the natural environment can add meaning as well as play opportu- nities. Some possible examples of these sorts of features are a sun dial or marine motifs incorporated into pav- ing or climbing rocks. MASTER PLAN PLN2 Packet Pg. 41 1% hNLL, IN EDMONDS CITY PARK Children 's P l a I3.A.1.a PLN21- , P , acket Pg. 42—] 2ND AVE S Tf ff�� 'fir SR104 -_ _ i 3RD AVE SLQ n r-� rnn rn n n �n R x3 r n Phases 1, 2, and 3 are consecutive phases. Their sequence is determined by a logical construction order and by physical proximity of constructed elements. There is no provision for inflation. PHASE 1 2 Way Entry Road North Parking Lot New Entry to Maintenance Area Service Drive to Ballfield Horseshoe Courts Pedestrian Connection to Wetland PHASE 2 New Restroom 3 Picnic Shelters PHASE 3 New Children's Play Area and Spray Feature South Parking Lot Large Picnic Shelter Kiosk PHASE 1-COST ESTIMATE Item Qty Unit Unit Price Cost SITE PREPARATION Free Preservation 1 is $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Clearing and Grubbing 1 is $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Demolition Paving 29,000 sf $0.50 $14,500.00 a ' 31150 sy $1.50 $4,725.00 UTILR1ES Catch Basins/Lines/Swales 1 is $28,550.00 $28,550.00 IRRIGATION Controllers, Heads, and Lines 25,000 sf $0.60 $15,000.00 Trees 80 ea $250.00 $20,000.00 Shrubs 300 ea $15.00 $415M.00 Ground Cover 3p00 sf $2.00 $6,000.00 Gass 30,000 sf $0.15 $4,500.00 Soil Prep and Amendments 250 cy $25.00 $6,50.00 PAVING Asphalt Paving/Road & Parking 50,000 sf $1.75 $87,500.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,140 If $10.00 $31,400.00 Asphalt Path 4,000 sf $1.25 $5,000.00 Concrete Path 600 sf $2.50 $1,500.00 Entry Plinths 1 ea $12,822.00 $12,822.00 Bridge at SR104 1 is $4,000.00 $4,000.00 31TE F1]RNISSHINGS Frash Receptacle 2 ea $350.00 $700.00 Bice Rack 1 ea $300.00 $300.00 Horseshoe Courts 1 is $300.00 $300.00 34nage 1 is $2,500.00 $2,500.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL FEES AND SERVICES 10% Design and Construction Observation Fee $26,504.70 30% Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $79,514.10 M Mobilization $13,252.35 Total $34,225.00 $28,550.00 $15,000.00 $412-%.00 $125,400.00 $16,822.00 $265,047.00 TOTAL PHASE 1 %K318.15 as 0�c Y V fC d W 0 0 'L^ V c a� E Q. a� 0 U) a U) c A W 0 U x W c tv W 2 0 CL o� W 0�ti N O 0 N N 0 N z J a� a 28 ❑ PHASING & COST ESTIMATES PLN2 Packet Pg. 43 PHASE 2-COST ESTIMATE Item Qty Unit Unit Price Cost SITE PREPARATION Tree Preservation 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Clearing and Grubbing 1 is $1,000.00 Demolition Paving 1,600 sf $0•75 $0.75 $1,200.00 Demolition 3 Shelters & Restroom 1 Is $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Remove Site Furnishings 1 1s $500.00 $500.00 Grading �5 1,400 sy $150 $2,100.00 Sanitary Lnanns 1 is $15,750.00 $15,750.00 Underground Electrical Service 1 is $4,000 00 $4,000 {70 Water Lines 480 If $10.00 $4,800.00 1 Is $3,000.00 $3,000.00 IRRIGATION Controllers, Heads, and Lines 12,500 sf $0 60 $7,500 LANDSCAPING Trees 15 ea $250.00 $3,750.00 Shrubs 100 ea $15.00 $1,500.00 Ground Cover 1,5W sf $2.00 $3,000.00 Grass 11,000 sf $0.15 $1,650.00 Soil Prep and Amendments 80 cy $25.00 $2AW.00 PAVING Asphalt Path 4,000 sf $1.75 $7,000,00 Concrete Path or Paving 1,120 sf $2.50 $2,800.00 BUILDINGS O°m 1 ea $110,074.00 $110,074DO Picnic Shelters with Firepiace 3 ea $25,363.00 $76p89.00 SITE FURNISHINGS Trash Receptacle 4 ea $350.00 $1,400.00 Permanent Picnic Tables 12 ea $1,200.00 $14,400.00 EHLeq1e 12 ea $275.00 $3,3W.OD CONSTRUCTION TOTAL FEES AND SERVICES 109% Design and Construction Observation Fee 30% Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $2$281.30 5°Io Mobilization $28M3 90 $14,140.65 TuIAL PRASE2 PHASE 3-COST ESTIMATE Total Bern Qty Unit Unit Price Cost SITE PREPARATION Tree Preservation 1 is $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Clearing and Grubbing 1 is $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Demolition Paving 2,000 sf $0.75 $1,500.00 Remove Site Furnishings and Pool 1 is $2,5Q0.00 $2,500.00 Grading 2,000 sy $1.50 $3,000.00 $20,800.00 [ 7111= $27,550.00 $7,500.00 $11,900.00 11i $186,163.00 $19,100.00 $282,813.00 Catch Basins/Storml nes 1 is $4,000.00 $4,QD0.Op Underground Electrical Service 1 is $500.00 $50000 Water Lines 140 1f $10.00 $1,400.00 Sanitary Lines 80 If $25.00 $2,OM.00 IRRIGATION Controllers, Heads, and Lines 35,{ O sf $0.60 $21,00D.00 LANDSCAPING Trees 60 ea $250.00 $15,000.00 Shrubs 300 ea $15.00 $4,500.00 Ground Cover 4,000 sf $2.00 $8,000.00 Grass 31M sf $0.15 $4,&%.00 Soil Prep and Amendments 240 cy ------ $25.00 $6,000.00 PAVING .Asphalt Paving Concrete Curb and Gutter Asphalt Path Concrete Path BUILDINGS Large Picnic Shelter SITE FURNISHINGS 24,5W sf $1.25 $M,625.00 1,050 if $10.00 $10,500.00 2,000 sf $0.75 $1,500.00 5,000 sf ... $2.50 $12,500.00 1 ea $3,810.00 - $3,810.00 1 ea $61,483.00 $61,483.00 Trash Receptacle 6 ea $350.00 $2,100.00 Simile 1 Is $1,5W.00 $1,500.00 Permanent Picnic Table 15 ea $1,200.00 $18,000.00 Barbe1ue 15 ea $273.00 $4,125.00 Resilient Play Surface 4,000 sf $12.00 $48,000.00 Sand 300 cy $20.00 $6,000.00 Play Equipment 1 Is $73,000.00 $75,000.00 Spray Feature 1 is $33,000.00 $35,000.00 Conc Retaining Wall w/ Stone Cap 1 is $30,000.00 $30,000 00 CCV,TC9FVT Tr ITfr't •rv'rr n T $410,078.85 FEES AND SERVICES y l 10% Design and Construction Observation Fee $41,719.30 30% Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $125157 90 5% Mobilization $2W9.65 AL PHASE 3 Total $10,000.00 $7,900.00 $21,000.00 $38,150.00 $55,125.00 $65,293.00 $219,725.00 $417,193.00 $604,929.85 PHASING & 0 COST ESTIMATES PLN2 Packet Pg. 44 a� c 2 Y V CU B aD a� N 7 0 c a� c a� E a a� 0 0 Y a Cn c 0 w 0 U t x w c w x 0 0 a a� cu U) r` N O O N N 0 N Z J d c a� 0 R a SR104�-c fI i5o ZND AVE S E , z n ' F� F n� n F rnn in ., n .L-ram=• _ �` ll - �- i 3RD AVE S �' \i r1 C 4} PHASE A -COST ESTIMATE Item Qty Unit Unit Price SITE PREPARATION Cost Tree Preservation 1 is $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Clearing and Grubbing 1 is $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Gra ' 500 sy $1.50 $750.00 IRRIGATION and Lines 6,000 sf Trees 25 ea $250.00 $6 250.00 Shnibs 500 ea $15.00 $7,500.00 Ground Cover 6,000 sf $2.00 $12,000.00 Soil Prep and Amendments 50 cy $25.00 $1,250.00 PAVING Bark Path 120 cy $30.00 $3,600.00 SrIE FURNISHINGS Trash Receptacle 2 ea $350.00 $700.00 Sisnaee 1 is $750.00 $750.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL FEES AND SERVICES 10% Design and Construction Observation Fee $4A40.00 30% Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $12,120.00 5% Mobilization $2,020.00 Total $4,750.00 $3,600.00 $27,000.00 $3,600.00 $1,450.00 $40AM.00 TOTAL PHASE A $581580.00 Phases A, B, and C are discrete phases. Construction of these phases can occur at any time. There is no provision for inflation. Costs reflect current construction costs in 1992. THASE A PHASE C Paths and Understory Plantings in Woodlands Greenhouses and Lath House CD o Plantings at Ballfield Bank Entry Court and Demonstration N Garden N PHASE B a Subdrainage at Amphitheater and Ballfield Wetland Garden E Boardwalk Path to Ballfield, Bleachers a Upgrade Gazebo to Kitchen ❑ PHASING & 30 COST ESTIMATESPLN2 Packet Pg. 45 14 min PHASE C-COST ESTIMATES , :per, SE B-COST ESTIMATES Unit Price Cost Total Qty Unit Unit Price Cost Total Item Qty Unit Item SITE PREPARATION SM PREPARATION 1 !s $1,0[i0.00 $lAIX]•f10 Tree Preservation 1 is M-00 •0Q _ ° Tree pservation 1 is $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Clearing and Gnibbing 1 ]s $1,000.00 $1,000.00 ° Clearinand g 1 is $500.00 $5(10.00 Demolition Buildings -Storage 1 is $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Deiition Gravel 3,700 sy $1.50 $5,550.00 $9,050.00 Remove Site Furnishings -Fence 1 is $500.00 $500.00 Grades Grading 400 sy $150 $600.00 $7,600.00 _ in1I-TI �S 200 5tomn Lines, 100 if if $20.00 $25.00 $4,OW.00 $2,500.00 uS jxs1 Is $4,950.00 $4,950.00 f° ��y Lines 1 is $600.00 $600.00 Underground Electrical 1 ]s $500.00 $5(10.00 y ' Underground Electrical Water Lines 100 if $10.00 $1,000.00 $8,100.00 Water Lines 60 1 if Is $10.00 $1,5W.00 $600.00 $1,500.00 $7,550.00 ° IRRIGATION Controllers, Heads, and Lines 33,000 sf $0.60 $19,800.00 $19,800.00 Pip IRRIGATION Controllers, Heads, and Lines 3,500 sf $0.60 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 ` � I,p�5CAPING 15 Trees ea $250.00 $3,750.00 LANDSCAPING 15 $250.00 $3,750.0(i E L Shrubs 300 ea $157.00 $4,500•00 Trees 200 ea ea $15.00 $3,000.00 Ground Cover 3,000 30M ea sf $2.00 $0.15 $6,000.00 $4,5W.00 Shrubs Ground Cover 2,000 sf $2.00 $4,0M.00 �c Grass Soil prep and Amendments 200 cy $25.00 $5,000.00 $23,750.00 200 50 sf CY $0.15 $25.00 $30A0 $1,250.00 $12,030.00 a Soil Prep and AYxiendments PAVING Asphait Path 3,00 sf $1.25 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 PAVING 2,700 sf $125 $3,375.00 � ° BUILDINGS Asphalt Road Paving Concrete Entry & Paving 750 sf $5.00 $3,750.00 7125.0( $ , w Renovate Restraorn 1 is $30,268.00 $30 268.00 BUILDINGS ° renovate Gazebo as Kitchen 1 is $40,095.00 $40)%5.00 Greenhouses and Lath I -louse 1 ea $175,924.00 $175,924.00 $175,924.IX Boardwalk and Platform 1,100 1 sf ea $50.00 $61,483.00 $55,000 00 $61,483.00 $186,836.00 SITE FURNISHINGS U �' KEosk Trash Receptacle 2 ea $350.00 $700.00 SITE FURNISHINGS Bleachers 1 is $7,500.00 $7,5W.00 Sr 1 2r0 is if $1,000.00 $30.00 $1,000.00 $7,500.00 $9,200.0 w Trash Receptacle 4 ea $350.00 $1,400.00 $8,900.00 Fencing c $260,436.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $221,529.0 w x CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 0 r FEES AND SERVICES ° FEES AND SERVICES $26 043.60 10°I° Design and Construction Observation Fee $22,152.90 10% Design and Construction Observation Fee 30°I° Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $66,458.70 300l6 Overhead, Profit, and Contingency $78,130.80 5% Mobilization $11,076.45 5% Mobilization $13,021.80 rn $321,�17J c TOTAL PHASE B $377,630 � TOTAL PHASE C GRAND TOTAL - ALL PHASES $2r15b,756. N c N Z J d r-+ C d E t V R a PHASING & Fj COST ESTIMATES PLN2 Packet Pg. 46 3.A.1.a PRESENTATION AND HEARING ON MASTER PLAN FOR EDMONDS CITY PARK Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Manager, said Kenichi Nakano of Nakano Dennis Landscape Archi- tects, has completed the Master Plan for City Park. Ms. Ohlde said she feels the Master Plan is a good Master Plan which incorporates all of the community input. jfi{ _ Mr. Nakano presented the Master Plan to the Mayor and City Council. The presentation included �j the existing conditions of City Park. Site Analysis, User Survey, Design Goals, Circulation Con- {fflJ 'i14` n``1a cepts, Master Plan Alternatives, and Cost Estimates and Phasing. J Mr. Nakano said the grand total for all phases of the Master Plan is approximately two million C��dollars. Mr. Nakano reminded the Mayor and Council that the phasing, therefore, cost, is spread Q over a 20 year time period. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if any of the community mailings revealed the cost of the Master Plan, and Mr. Nakano replied negatively. Councilmember Dwyer feels more community involvement would occur if the people knew the cost involved. Mayor Hall opened up the public portion of the hearing. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, said he did not realize the cost of implementing the Master Plan. Audrey Reese, 434 3rd Avenue, E&Ponds, said she is representing the residents of City Park Condo- miniums. Ms. Reese said the residents feel the Master Plan is a good one. Councilmember Dwyer asked Ms. Reese if she or other residents of City Park Condominiums were aware of the costs involved in implementing the Master Plan, and Ms. Reese replied negatively. Joe Camden, 1021 "A" Avenue, Edmonds, said as a user of City Park, he feels the Maintenance Facil- ity should be removed. Sid Locke, 110 Pine Street, Edmonds. said he has met with as many neighbors as he could prior to tonight's meeting and the general feeling is the Maintenance Facility should be removed. Mr. Locke complemented the Architecture on the Master Plan. Mr. Locke said he did show the Master Plan to many neighbors who seemed to approve of it. Mr. Locke said there is one neighbor who is wheelchair bound and is concerned over access to the restrooms. With no other member of the audience wishing to come forward on this subject, Mayor Hall closed the public portion of the hearing. Council Discussion and Deliberation The Council agreed that the Maintenance Facility should be removed. Council President Palmer asked Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Manager, which portions of the phasing would be grant eligible. Ms. Ohlde said the City has access to a HUD Grant which could be utilized for park paths. Ms. Ohlde said the restrooms might be grant eligible, as well as grants available under Department of Natural Resources. Councilmember Hall said he is concerned that the Plan does not call for dual access or exits to the park. Councilmember Nordquist asked Ms. Ohlde if the Parks Board has ever studied the issue of removing the Maintenance Facility, and Ms. Ohlde replied affirmatively. Ms. Oblde said past discussions concluded that it would be removed after a new Public Works Building was constructed. As a procedural matter, COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO EXTEND THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDEO BY COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, THAT THE CITY ADOPT THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE EDMONDS CITY PARK AND FURTHER, THAT THE CITY MAKES THE REMOVAL OF THE MAINTENANCE AREA WITHIN CITY PARK A HIGH PRIORITY. MOTION CARRIEO with Councilmember Kasper voting no. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 May 18, 1992 NOVEMBER 1991 Nakano ♦ Dennis meets with Edmonds Parks and Recreation fo Programming DECEMBER 1991 Consultant Team visits City Park with Parks and Recreation Staff and Planning Board JANUARY 22,1992 Nakano ♦ Dennis presents Site Analysis Plans to Edmonds Plan- ning Board FEBRUARY 5,1992 Design Team Meeting to review 4 possible Master Plan Alternatives FEBRUARY 26,1992 Nakano ♦ Dennis present 2 Alter- native Master Plans to Edmonds Planning Board MARCH 25,1992 Nakano ♦ Dennis presents Maste Plan to Edmonds Planning Board Plan approved. APRIL 22,1992 Nakano ♦ Dennis presents Maste Plan- Report to Edmonds Plan ninj Board. Report approved. MAY 18,1992 Nakano ♦ Dennis and Edmonds Parks and Recreation Division present Master Plan Report to a Edmonds City Council. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS PLN2 Packet Pg.47 I 3.A.1.a I City of Edmonds Edmonds City Park 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 376.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for 4,514 p B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary _Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION u..Q Legend a ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN N — <all other values> C 1 0 E 2 '0 W s; a 0 9;71;7;8 State Highways V — <all other values> N r -- 0 t 1 k W 2 a - Sections Boundary Sections Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN <all other values> Interstate Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street; On Ramp State Highways <all other values> -- 0 1 2 Notes 600 3rd Ave. S Greenhouse Setback Variance File: PLN2022-0027 Packet Pg. 48 1 3.A.1.a City of Edmonds Maintenance Yard at City Park 'too, •xti lid yy hl ' �. o x-kti �+ ..3i' I • L WLt , Trb 1: 758 0 63.15 126.3 Feet 94.0 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet 1,128 p' B p mapping site and reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be acct WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary _Sphere current, or otherwise rel © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUC In Legend a ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN N — <all other values> C 1 0 2 '0 W 5; 4 O 9;71;7;8 - - Sections Boundary V Sections r I- Edmonds Boundary t r ArcSDE.GIS. PROP ERTY_BUILDIP W ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN 0 — <all other values> fC W= _ Interstate Principal Arterial r �O Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street State Highways w - - <all other values> M in -- 0 r- N 1 9 2 N N County Boundary N Z Parks J a ArcSDE.GIS. PROP ERTY_WASHII; ArcSDE.GIS. PROPERTY _CITIES y n r_e nonxory rrcc ...enc U �a Notes a Packet Pg. Pg. 49 1 � f!F ' ? i NIP ova AkT "Mm10 1 1 '-7 0 I N so ik 20'-0" 4V 4 i E�m •ter - EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT 48'-0" / —'q(1-2.0 o • -�� '11--� NEW GREENHOUSE BUILDING A _ O o ALIGN WITH BACK OF EXISTING 0 o GREENHOUSE BUILDING I N N -------------- ------------ ---------------------------------------------- o I r-10 N ECOLOGY BLOCK RETAINING WALL FRENCH DRAIN PINE STREET go EXISTING PROP BUILDING AN 40 7mm"=7= 0' 2.5' 5' 10' NORTH SCALE lac. I g9 City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 (1, � fo� �pc 1R • Call 811 • © two business days before you dig Parks Maintenance Yard Greenhouse Replacement 600 3rd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Permit Submittal SITE PLAN Revisions # Description Date Designed By: RD Drawn By: GK Checked By: -- Project No.: 2021-20-05 Date: April 2022 s x W W O O co ti N O O N N O N z J a r c a� a LS.01 PLN2 Packet Pg. 53 3.A.1.a 24'-0" EX CHAIN LINK FENCE ECOLOGY BLOCK 2 0 RETAINING WALL L2.02 1 co O 5'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" FRONT ELEVATION I_1 0 N MULCH/LANDSCAPE STORAGE AREA NOT TO SCALE • 4x8 i 4x8 i 4x8 I I I 10'-0" 4x8 FINISH GRADE (SAME AS EXISTING) 5'-0" 4x8 i 4x8 i i i i 4x8 ----------------- x l x l x l x-------- I 4x8 I 4x8 I� i � i i� i � I 4x8 I I I I I I I I o 4 F_ ---_T - 4x8 1 4x8 i 4x8 i 4x8 i 4x8 i 4x8 I I I I I PLAN: INTERIOR LAYOUT MAXIMIZE BENCHES (20 BENCHES) BUILDING INTERIOR LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE I �M] ELETRICAL PANEL EX PROP BUILDING ROLL UP DOOR 10'-0" FINISH GRADE (SAME AS SIDE ELEVATION MULCH/LANDSCAPE STORAGE AREA NOT TO SCALE 2 0 I r EXISTING) EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE EX ECOLOGY BLOCK (REUSED) SLOPE EX a 00000000000 _ �111m o v 0000000000 I v 00000000 ' WASHED DRAIN ROCK o 0000000 o. a 0`1 0` WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE O oa v 0000000000 O O O O�� Ell I 00 0 0 0 0 _ — — — 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 00000000 a 0 0 0 — � O O O O 0 0 0 0 = 0000000 O O 0 _ _ _ �IIIIII=III PERFORATED III III PIPE, SLOPE —1 1 1-1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I—i IITO DRAIN TO WEST — OUTLET CRUSHED GRAVEL TO --- ECOLOGY BLOCK RETAINING WALL NOT TO SCALE lac. Ig City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Ni UVIL", �pc ONS�R 811 Y ©Call two business days before you dig 0 w Parks 0 Maintenance Yard x W Greenhouse = Replacement 0 Q 600 3rd Avenue South Cn Edmonds, WA 98020 N 0 O N N O N Z J d c �a Q Permit Submittal ELEVATIONS, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DETAILS Revisions # Description Date Designed By: RD Drawn Bv: GK Checked By: -- Project No.: 2021-20-05 Date: April 2022 LSm02 PLN2 Packet Pg. 54 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION May 6, 2022 Angie Feser City of Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources 700 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Letter of Complete Application — City Greenhouse Variance Dear Angie, I have reviewed application materials submitted on April 5, 2022 and the fee paid on April 8, 2022 in support of the variance request for the City's greenhouse at 600 3r1 Ave. S. Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.02.002, the application has been determined to meet the procedural submission requirements and are therefore complete; please accept this letter as the City's completeness notice in accordance with ECDC 20.02.003. While the application is technically complete, the City may request additional information or seek clarification during review of the project. Per ECDC 20.03, a notice of application must be issued by May 19, 2022. A date for the public hearing has not been set yet but once it has, a separate notice of public hearing will be issued If you have any questions, please let me know either at 425-771-0220 x 1330 or michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov. Sincerely, Mike Clugston, AICP Senior Planner PLN2 Packet Pg. 55 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services is requesting a setback variance at the maintenance yard at City Park to replace two old greenhouses with a new greenhouse in approximately the same location. The request also seeks to alter the required replacement landscaping within the reduced setback area. PROJECT LOCATION: 600 3rd Ave. S (Tax ID #: 27032600101300) NAME OF APPLICANT: Angie Feser FILE NO.: PLN2022-0027 DATE OF APPLICATION: April 8, 2022 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: May 6, 2022 DATE OF NOTICE: May 19, 2022 REQUESTED PERMITS: Variance (Type III-B decision by the Hearing Examiner — a public hearing will be scheduled, and separate notice provided, at a future date) OTHER REQUIRED Building and Engineering permits PERMITS: REQUIRED STUDIES: None at this time EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Critical area determination COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 2, 2022 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httos://www.edmondswa.aov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2022-0027, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. All comments submitted are public records subject to disclosure per RCW 42.56. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 PLN2 Packet Pg. 56 I 3.A.1.a I ,0 " City of Edmonds Properties within 300' of City Park 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 376.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet 4, 514 p B p mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary _Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION E6—ds ,o 1 •.• IA9p llek N Legend a ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN N — <all other values> C 1 0 E 2 '0 W s; a 0 9;71;7;8 V State Highways — <all other values> N r -- 0 t 1 k W 2 a - Sections Boundary Sections Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN <all other values> Interstate Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street; On Ramp State Highways <all other values> -- 0 1 2 Notes 600 3rd Ave. S Greenhouse Setback Variance File: PLN2022-0027 Packet Pg. 57 1 3.A.1.a PARCEL ID OWNERNAME OWNERLINEI OWNERLINE2 OWNERCITY OWNERSTATE OWNERZIP 00799000110100 PETRIE LYNETTEJ 1825058TH AVE NE KENMORE WA 98028 00799000110200 WASCHOW WILLIAM & JEANNIE 795 MAIN ANTIOCH IL 60002 00799000110300 MIDDENDORFIOAN F 4303RDAVE S UNITA103 EDMONDS WA 98020-3577 00799000110400 WARNOCK RUSSELL & RUTH K 4303RD AVE S UNIT A104 EDMONDS WA 98020-3577 00799000110500 SILVERSTEIN FRED&ELEANOR 116 MARINA UN FRIDAY HARBOR WA 98250 00799000120100 STRICKLAND SARA E 4303RD AVE S A201 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000120200 LUNDE KRISTOFFER/LUNDE SUZANNE TRUST 4303RD AVE S UNIT A-202 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000120300 BITTNER VINCENT G REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 4303RD AVE S UNIT A203 EDMONDS WA 98020-3577 00799000120400 CHAN FANNAN A&PO YEE BARBARA 4303RD AVE S UNIT A204 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000120500 KENDALL MARYF 4283RD AVE S UNIT A205 EDMONDS WA 98020-9433 00799000210100 MARTIN DAVIDL 4323RD AVE S#B-101 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000210200 ROOD DAVID R&BARBARA J 4323RD AVE S UNIT B102 EDMONDS WA 98020-9434 00799000210300 QU SANGNI&HAYES LAMES 4323RD AVE S#B103 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000210400 BELT MARLENEF 4323RD AVE S UNIT B104 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000210500 MEYER LAMES BRUCE& MURPHY KATHLEEN VERA 4323RD AVE S UNIT B105 EDMONDS WA 98020-9434 00799000210600 BURBACH JOANNEB 4323RD AVE S UNIT B106 EDMONDS WA 98020-9434 00799000220100 FRANEY FAMILY TRUST 2113 NW 201ST ST SHORELINE WA 98177 00799000220200 KARRICK BRYAN S&KIMBERLEY) 4323RD AVE S UNIT B202 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000220300 PORTER FRANKI & MARY L 432 3RD AVE S UNIT B203 EDMONDS WA 98020-9435 00799000220400 FOOT KIRSTEN A& PUCHALSKI RALPH B 4323RD AVE S#B 204 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000220500 BELT MARLENEF 18401 HOMEVIEW DR EDMONDS WA 98026 00799000220600 WOOD DAVID LEE 4323RD AVE S UNIT B206 EDMONDS WA 98020-9435 00799000310100 BISCHEL FRANKLIN H&DONNA J 4343RD AVE S#C101 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000310200 DONAGHUE ROSEMARY E 4343RD AVE S UNIT C102 EDMONDS WA 98020-3597 00799000310300 HEWITT FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 303 WALDPORT OR 97394 00799000320100 WALLACE JANETL 4343RD AVE S UNIT C201 EDMONDS WA 98020 00799000320200 RIVAS ELIZABETH 3011 BOUNDARY OAKS DR OWENS CROSS ROADS AL 35763 00799000320300 ROBINSON BRENT&LAURIE 4343RD AVE S UNIT C203 EDMONDS WA 98020-3597 00799000320400 WINANT LEANNAK 4343RD AVE S UNIT C204 EDMONDS WA 98020-3597 27032600100300 OLYMPIC & SOUND VIEW LLC 126254TH AVE W STE 200 EVERETT WA 98204 00884900000100 PEREZ RACHELF 4203RD AVE S UNIT#1 EDMONDS WA 98020 00884900000200 CORDOVA CHARLES O&GEORGIAM 14238TH PLS EDMONDS WA 98020-6609 00884900000300 NASH ARLENEJ 4203RD AVE S#3 EDMONDS WA 98020 00884900000400 HAGGLUND MARIAN E/HAGGLUND KIRSTIN J 420 THIRD AVE S#4 EDMONDS WA 98020 00884900000500 SCHULLER BRYAN D&ERICKAL 4203RD AVE S UNIT 5 EDMONDS WA 98020 27032600101200 EDMONDS PARK ASSOCIATES LLC 600 QUEEN ANNE AVE N SEATTLE WA 98109 00872700051400 FARMER LAMES R&PATRICIA W 5144TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00872700051800 GRIGNON DIANEH 5184TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00409600100101 PUGSLEY KEVIN&KORYNN 308 HOWELL WAY EDMONDS WA 98020 00409600100102 RAMMGARY&CHARLENE 501119TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105-3306 00409600100300 ROTH TIMOTHY H/HILDEBRAND ALANNA M 5153RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4103 00409600100400 MAHONEY SUSANA 5213RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98026 00409600100500 SPARKS ALANJ 5273RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00409600100600 STOULIL RYAN COREY PO BOX 841 EDMONDS WA 98020 00409600100700 STEINLE PAMELA 112 ST ANDREWS PL TULLAHOMA TN 37388 00409600100800 LARSON HELMAA 5413RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4103 00409600100900 KILLIN JONATHAN & SELENA 5433RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4103 00409600101100 PICKETT RONALD 6544TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-7226 00409600101200 LORETTE ALLAN R&SALLY B 5584TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00409600101300 LARSON GREGG &DARCIE 5544TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00409600101400 DRULLINGER MARK A 5444TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00409600101500 DOWD-TIMONEN PATRICIA TRUST 5344TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00409600101600 MT BAKER ASSOCIATES LP PO BOX 1329 EDMONDS WA 98020 00409600101700 PHIPPS FAMILY RLT 22929108TH AVEW EDMONDS WA 98020-5189 00409600101000 MILLER GREGG A&SCHMITT KELUEA 5453RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4103 00409700000100 RAUGI BRANDONJ 7033RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4107 00409700000300 CRAIG KATHRYNA 7153RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4107 00409700000400 BLACKBURN E ELIZABETH 7213RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00409700000601 MARTIN SCOTT E & DEBORAH 319 PINE Sr EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00409700000602 HARVEY KEZIA M&CHARLES RJR 7284TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-7228 00409700000701 MARTIN SCOTT E & DEBORAH 319 PINE Sr EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00409700000702 HARVEY KEZIA M&CHARLES RJR 7284TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-7228 00409700000800 COPSTEAD ELIZABETH F 931 MOUNTAIN LANE EDMONDS WA 98020 00409700000900 COPSTEAD ELIZABETH F 931 MOUNTAIN LANE EDMONDS WA 98020 00409700001000 CRUMP ERICJ&KARENJ 7024TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-7228 00582000400101 FREIMARK STEVE 126 PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4123 00582000400300 LANGVOLD HELENM 10302ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4101 00582000400103 MILLER RAPHAEL J & MARIEKA ILO PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4123 00582000300102 NICHOLSON DONALD EUGENE 10052ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4101 00582000300103 ESCANDON STEVEN & ROSARIO 216 PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4124 00582000300104 PETERS MARY BETH 220 PINE EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000300201 ROESCH THOMAS R&ANNEM 10103RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4109 00582000300202 NICHOLSON DONALD E 10052ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4101 00582000300203 CAREY KATHERINE PO BOX 393 EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000300300 GRABER JOSEPH L&5EIALP 10312ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4101 00582000300302 GRABER JOSEPH L&5EIALP 10303RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4109 00582000200101 BASAM T IL&JOUDEH LOUBABA 306 PINE ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 00582000200102 KORPI DAVID W & LAURIE A 330 PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00582000200103 RUPP JENNIED 320 PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00582000200104 THOMAS BENJAMIN T&ASHTYNR 310 PINE ST EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00582000200201 GORONCZY BARBARA 10233RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000200202 SAFAIREBECCA 10184TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000200203 WEISS RAYMONDJ 10133RD AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000200204 RUNYAN DAWN 10368TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000200205 CHAN DAVID C&NAKAGAWA JANER 10204TH AVES EDMONDS WA 98020-4154 00582000200302 ZEPP SAMANTHA ELIZABETH & ORE BRIAN JOSE 1043 3RD AVE S EDMONDS WA 98020-4109 00704300002100 SINGH ZILE&SUNITA 21631 MAKAH RD WOODWAY WA 98020-4196 00704300002200 ROGERSRICHARDT&CHRISTINER 11301 MAKAH RD WOODWAY WA 98020-4179 00409600101901 HOGGINS DALE E & DONNA L 2182695TH AVE W EDMONDS WA 98020 00409700000500 MOTLAND AUCIA&MATTHEW 305 PINE SF EDMONDS WA 98020-4125 00582000300101 SCHEIDERER THOMAS D&JUDITHM 120572ND AVE NW SEATTLE WA 98177 00582000400201 FOSTER FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 10222ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000400202 WOODY ANTHONY J&STEPHANIEM 3151ST AVE N UNIT 208 SEATTLE WA 98109 00582000400203 LAMBERT LOUISA HUYNH & CLINTON JOHN 10262ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00409600101904 CHALMERS GINA LIVING TRUST 318 HOWELL WAY EDMONDS WA 98020-4119 00409600101903 BOZE TIMOTHY A & TAMI R 314 HOWELL WAY EDMONDS WA 98020-4119 00582000300200 SHI BEIHONG 10212ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 00582000300204 SELECT HOMES INC 1653113TH AVE W STE A107 LYNNWOOD WA 98037 00799000110100 PETRIE LYNETTEJ 4303RD AVE S UNIT A101 EDMONDS WA 98020-3577 00799000210400 BELT CHARLES L/ROBERT P/REEVE W/RACHELM 18401 HOMEVIEW DR EDMONDS WA 98026 00799000220400 FOOT KIRSTEN 7810175TH ST SW EDMONDS WA 98026 00799000320300 ROBINSON BRENT/LAURIE 16 CLEMENTINE LANE MOUNT PLEASANT CHRISTCHURCH New Zealand 8081 27032600100300 OLYMPIC & SOUND VIEW LLC 127114TH AVEW EVERETT WA 98204-5783 00884900000200 CORDOVA CHARLES 4203RD AVE S#2 EDMONDS WA 98020 27032600101200 EDMONDS PARK ASSOCIATES LLC 4111 E MADISON ST UNIT 490 SEATTLE WA 98112 00409700000100 RAUGI BRANDON JITTEE 7219164TH PLACE SW EDMONDS WA 98026 00582000200102 KORPI DAVID 2172585TH PL W EDMONDS WA 98026-7827 00409600101901 HOGGINS DALE E & DONNA L 5104TH AVE S EDMONDS WA 98020-4110 00582000300204 NICHOLSON DONALD E 10112ND AVES EDMONDS WA 98020 Yellow is a taxpayer address if different from the owner address PLN2 Packet Pg. 58 3.A.1.a File No.: PLN2022-0027 Applicant: City of Edmonds Parks Setback Variance DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 19th day of May, 2022, the attached Notice of Application was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where applicable on or near the subject property. I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 19th day of May, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: PLN2 Packet Pg. 59 3.A.1.a FILE NO.: PLN2022-0027 Applicant: City of Edmonds Parks @ 600 311 Ave S/Notice o Application - Variance Type III B Hearing Examiner) DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 19th day of May, 2022, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City of Edmonds to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above - referenced application. The adjacent property owners list was provided by the applicant. I, Michelle Martin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 19th day of May, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: X"ae X"rig {BFP747887.D0C;1\00006.900000\ } PLN2 Packet Pg. 60 3.A.1.a From: Martin, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 8:55 AM To: Legal Advertising EDH Cc: Clugston, Michael Subject: RE: [edh legals] Request to Publish PLN2022-0027 May 19, 2022 Thank you Karen! 7KL �4e2Pe Xatrw I Administrative Assistant City of Edmonds Planning Division 425-771-0220, ext 1335 Michelle. Martin@edmondswa.gov The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:00am to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:00am to 2:00pm; appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 1 425.771.0220 1 Email I Devserv.admin@edmondswa. From: Legal Advertising EDH <legals@heraldnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 8:54 AM To: Martin, Michelle <Michelle.Martin@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Re: [edh legals] Request to Publish PLN2022-0027 May 19, 2022 Michelle, I will schedule the notices to publish May 19, 2022. Thank you, Karen Herald Legals The Daily Herald 11800 41 st Street, S-300 I Everett, WA 98203 425-339-3100 1 legalS(cDherald net. com I www.heraldnet.com Stay Connected —read today's top story amThe Da&j Herald is the leading provider of news, information, and advertising in Snohomish County. PLN2 Packet Pg. 61 3.A.1.a I Fr E ff M e C Map Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:48 AM Martin, Michelle <Michelle.Martingedmondswa. og_v> wrote: Thank you! 7&&Ji & r&'a I Administrative Assistant City of Edmonds Planning Division 425-771-0220, ext 1335 Michelle. Martin(@edmondswa. The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:OOam to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:OOam to 2:OOpm; appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 1 425.771.0220 1 Email I Devserv.admin@edmondswa.gov PLN2 Packet Pg. 62 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '17C. 18yV PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services is requesting a setback variance at the maintenance yard at City Park to replace two old greenhouses with anew greenhouse in approximately the same location. The request also seeks to alter the required replacement landscaping within the reduced setback area. The site is zoned Public (P). PROJECT LOCATION: 600 3rd Ave. S (Tax ID #: 27032600101300) NAME OF APPLICANT: Angie Feser FILE NO.: PLN2022-0027 REQUESTED PERMIT: Variance (Type III-B Permit, Public Hearing and Decision by the Hearing Examiner) COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 9, 2022 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at http://edmondswa.gov/public-notices-text/development-notices.html underthe development notice for application number PLN2022-0027, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. All comments submitted are public records subject to disclosure per RCW 42.56. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner on June 9, 2022 at 3 p.m. in the City of Edmonds Council Chambers, 250-5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 PLN2 Packet Pg. 63 3.A.1.a File No.: PLN2022-0027 Applicant: City of Edmonds Parks Setback Variance DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 26th day of May, 2022, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where applicable on or near the subject property. I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 26th day of May, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: PLN2 Packet Pg. 64 3.A.1.a FILE NO.: PLN2022-0027 Applicant: City of Edmonds Parks (k 600 3rd Ave S/Notice of Hearing - Variance Type III B Hearing Examiner) In -Person notice of hearing DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 26th day of May, 2022, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City of Edmonds to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above - referenced application. The adjacent property owners list was provided by the applicant. I, Michelle Martin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 26th day of May, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: 7?'li Ce& 711,aTtio {BFP747887.D0C;1\00006.900000\ } PLN2 Packet Pg. 65 3.A.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH955404 PLN2022-0027 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/26/2022 and ending on 05/26/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount the fee for s Ih publication is $70.52, Subscribed and sworn day of beforeme on this Nota Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 KERNEN LIEN M-- PLN21 3.A.1.a Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Edmonds Department of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services is requesting a setback variance at the maintenance yard at City Park to replace two old greenhouses with a new greenhouse In approximately the same location. The request also seeks to alter the required replacement landscaping within the reduced setback area. The site is zoned Public (P). PROJECT LOCATION: 600 3rd Ave. S (Tax 10 M 27032600101300) NAME OF APPLICANT: Angie Feser FILE NO.: PLN2022-0027 REQUESTED PERMIT: Variance (Type III-8 Permit, Public Hearing and Decision by the Hearing Examiner) COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 9, 2022 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at htlp://edmondswa.gov/public-notices-texUdeve lopmenl- notices.html under the development notice for application number PLN2022- 0027, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. All comments submitted are public records subject to disclosure per ROW 42.56. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner on June 9, 2022 at 3 p.m. in the City of Edmonds Council Chambers, 250 - 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner michael.CiLigston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 Published: May 26, 2022. EDH965404 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 05/26/2022 11:19:13 am Page:_' Packet Pg. 67 3.A.1.a Date: To: From: Subject MEMORANDUM May 19, 2022 Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN2022-0027— Setback Variance City Park — 600 3rd Ave S Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. The subject variance requests installation of a greenhouse within the 20-ft setback of Pine Street and SR-104, which will replace two aging greenhouses in the same location within the Parks maintenance yard. The existing topography is such that the greenhouses sit below street grade as compared to the adjacent travel lanes in Pine Street. There is existing mature vegetation near the intersection of Pine Street and SR-104 (Edmonds Way) and the location of the greenhouse within the required setbacks has no impact on sight distance at this intersection. City of Edmonds PLN2 Packet Pg. 68 3.A.1.a Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with any future building permit application for development on the site. Thank you. PLN2 Packet Pg. 69 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS nnyst,ilaingPermit.com Land Use Application #1119601 - City of Edmonds Greenhouse Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Anqie Feser City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation Dept Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 700 Main Street angie.feser(.@_edmondswa.gov City State Zip Phone Number Extension Edmonds WA 98020 4253615697 Contractor Company Name Number Street City State License Number Project Location Number Street 600 3RD AVE S City EDMONDS Associated Building Permit Number State Zip License Expiration Date Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension UBI # E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number Zip Code County Parcel Number 98020 27032600101300 Tenant Name City of Edmonds - Maintenance Shop Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Property Owner First Name Last Name or Company Name EDMONDS CITY OF Number Street Apartment or Suite Number 250 5TH AVE N City State Zip EDMONDS WA 98020-3146 Certification Statement - The applicant states: I certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. I have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 4/5/2022 Submitted By: Angie Feser PLN2 Packet Pg. 70 Page 1 of 2 3.A.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS Mysu;laingPerrnit.com Land Use Application #1119601 - City of Edmonds Greenhouse Project Contact Company Name: City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation Dept Name: Angie Feser Address: 700 Main Street Edmonds WA 98020 Email: angie.feser@edmondswa.gov Phone #: 4253615697 Project Type Activity Type New New Development Activity Project City of Edmonds Greenhouse Name: Scope of Work Project Approval The City of Edmonds is requesting approval of a variance in order to install a greenhouse within the 20-foot setback of Pine Street and SR-104 which will replace two aging greenhouses in the same location within the Parks maintenance yard. This also includes a request to waive the requirement to plant two trees in the Pine Street Setback or to plant them in an alternate location. Description This project consists of the demolition and removal of two existing greenhouse structures and the of Work: installation of one new greenhouse structure. The two existing greenhouse structures have been used beyond their intended lifespan and have several structural and functional issues as well as safety concerns. Additional improvements include installation of a low retaining wall approximately 7 feet from the property line and a french drain which will help to capture an overflow of stormwater runoff that comes onto the site from Pine Street. Project Details Development Type Land Use Page 2 of 2 PLN2 Packet Pg. 71 f 3.A.1.a f MyBui ldi ngPe rm i t. ce m Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: City of Edmonds Greenhouse Application ID: 1119601 Supplemental Name: Applicant Certification - Planning The applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The property affected by the application is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant or that the application has been submitted with the consent of all owners of the affected property. I certify, under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the information and exhibits herewith submitte are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on behalf of the owner of the subje property. I do so certify. PLN2 Packet Pg. 72