2022-01-04 City Council - Full Agenda-30471.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Op E D
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
s71. ,HvREGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE,
HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA
98020
JANUARY 4, 2022, 7:00 PM
THIS MEETING IS HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING PLATFORM. TO JOIN, COMMENT,
VIEW, OR LISTEN TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN ITS ENTIRETY, PASTE THE
FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE
ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE
AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND.
WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE.
IN ADDITION TO ZOOM, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED
LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS
1. Oath of Office/Swearing In Ceremony for Newly Elected Council members (10 min)
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION
1. Resolution of Appreciation for Service as Council President - Susan Paine (5 min)
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Agenda
January 4, 2022
Page 1
8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 23, 2021
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2021
3. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 14, 2021
4. Approval of Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2021
5. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
6. Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
7. Snohomish County Lease Renewal - Ballot Drop Box
8. Executive Assistant Job Description Revision
9. September 2021 Quarterly Financial Report
10. October 2021 Monthly Financial Report
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Selection of Council President and Council President Pro Tern for 2022 (10 min)
2. Virtual Only/Hybrid Meetings Discussion (45 min)
3. Ordinance amending Streateries Regulations (60 min)
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION RCW 42.30.110(1)(B) (20 MIN.)
11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION; POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION
12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. Council Committee Minutes (0 min)
13. COUNCIL COMMENTS
14. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
January 4, 2022
Page 2
2.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Oath of Office/Swearing In Ceremony for Newly Elected Councilmembers
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Typically, a newly elected official begins his or her term on or after the first day of January following the
election, but only after or upon taking the oath of office. The newly elected official may take the oath of
office beginning on January 1 or at the first meeting of the governing body after the first of the year.
State law also offers two additional options for taking the oath prior to the first of the year. RCW
29A.60.280(3) provides that the oath may be taken:
Up to 10 days prior to the scheduled date of assuming office (typically January 1). Note that the
oath does not have to be taken at a formal meeting of the governing body, although it often is.
At the last regular meeting of the city, county, or special purpose district governing body held
before the person elected is to assume office; If the governing body meets in a regular meeting
only once in December, regardless of date, the oath can be taken at that meeting.
If the oath is taken prior to January 1, then the elected official assumes office precisely at midnight on
January 1. The oath can be readministered for ceremonial purposes at the first meeting of the year if
this is desired.
The oath of office may be administered by any notary public or by any other officer authorized by
statute to administer oaths per RCW 29A.04.133(3). The following is a list of the officials in local
government who are authorized to administer the oath of office:
Court commissioner
Judicial officer
Judge
Clerk of court
County auditor or deputy auditor
County commissioner or county councilmember
Mayor of a code city, a town, or a second-class city
Mayor pro tem of a second-class city
Clerk of a code city
Town clerk or deputy clerk
Staff Recommendation
Packet Pg. 3
2.1
N/A
Narrative
On December 27, 2021, the official oath of office was administered to Councilmembers Kristiana
Johnson, Will Chen, and Neil Tibbott by the city clerk. Therefore, tonight's administration of the oath of
office is for public and ceremonial purposes.
Attachments:
Oaths of Office 2021
Packet Pg. 4
2.1.a
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
I, KRISTIANA JOHNSON, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support
the Constitution and Laws of the United States, the Constitution and Laws of
the State of Washington, and the laws of the City of Edmonds, and that I will
faithfully and impartially perform and discharge the duties of the office of
CITY OF EDMONDS COUNCIL POSITION NO. 1 for a 4-year term
according to law to the best of my ability.
Kristiana Johnson
The following can administer the oath: court commissioner, judicial officer, judge, clerk of the court, county
auditor or deputy auditor, county commissioner or county councilmember, mayor of a code city, a town, or a
second-class city, mayor pro tem of a second-class city, clerk of a code city, town clerk or deputy clerk.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this -7-7day of Qe_('.,M
Signature
Printed Name
-��
Official Title'
Packet Pg. 5
2.1.a
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
I, WILL CHEN, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the
Constitution and Laws of the United States, the Constitution and Laws of the
State of Washington, and the laws of the City of Edmonds, and that I will
faithfully and impartially perform and discharge the duties of the office of
CITY OF EDMONDS COUNCIL POSITION NO. 2 for a 4-year term
according to law to the best of my ability.
ill Chen
The following can administer the oath: court commissioner, judicial officer, judge, clerk of the court, county
auditor or deputy auditor, county commissioner or county councilmember, mayor of a code city, a town, or a
second-class city, mayor pro tern of a second-class city, clerk of a code city, town clerk or deputy clerk.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this Z— / day of'2�an
Signature
Printed Na
Official Title b �
Packet Pg. 6
2.1.a
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
I, NEIL TIBBOTT, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the
Constitution and Laws of the United States, the Constitution and Laws of the
State of Washington, and the laws of the City of Edmonds, and that I will
faithfully and impartially perform and discharge the duties of the office of
CITY OF EDMONDS COUNCIL POSITION NO. 3 for a 4-year term
according to law to the best of my ability.
2a�_
Neil Tib tt
The following can administer the oath: court commissioner, judicial officer, judge, clerk of the court, county
auditor or deputy auditor, county commissioner or county councilmember, mayor of a code city, a town, or a
second-class city, mayor pro tem of a second-class city, clerk of a code city, town clerk or deputy clerk.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this C day of IQC' r" y e"'�.
Signature
Printed N2
Official Title --1-�-�1-
Packet Pg. 7
5.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Resolution of Appreciation for Service as Council President - Susan Paine
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
It has been customary to adopt a resolution thanking the Council President for their service at the end of
their term as Council President.
Staff Recommendation
Adopt a resolution thanking Councilmember Paine for her dedication and service.
Narrative
A resolution will be presented to Councilmember Paine on the January 4, 2022 agenda.
Attachments:
RESOLUTION of Appreciation —Susan Paine
Packet Pg. 8
5.1.a
Reolution
,Qo: 1483
A 1Resolution Of The Edmonds City Counci(Thanking
Counciffresident Susan Paine forYferService To The Edmonds City Councif
Whereas, Susan Paine was elected Council President on January 5, 2021. During her tenure she presided over
the business of the City Council with a sense of humor, steadfast dedication, using her knowledge,
experience, and expertise to manage the day-to-day administration of the City Council and to
communicate with and embrace the concerns of Edmonds citizens, City staff, community leaders, and
other elected officials.
Whereas, during her term, Councilmember Paine approached her duties diligently — apprising herself of all the facts
and ensuring that the Council as a body had all the relevant information needed to make informed
decisions. As such, she helped to see the completion of the following:
Set weekly council meeting agendas
and oversaw 2021 Edmonds City
Council Retreat and Budgets
Passed a resolution halting the
issuance of driving while license
suspended in the third degree
(DWLS III
Protected the Edmonds Marsh and
tree canopy
Advocated for a Human and Social
Services program to serve
Edmonds' most vulnerable
Whereas, while on Council, Ms. Paine was involved with many committees and commissions on behalf of the City of
Edmonds including:
• Disability Board
• Port of Edmonds
• Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee
• Salmon Recovery — WRIA 8
,Sow, Therefore, �Be it 12esoked that Counci(ftesident Susan Paine be applauded and thanked for her leadership
and service to City Council.
Passed, Approved, andAdopted this 4th day of January 2022.
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Laura Johnson, Council President Pro -Tern
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 9
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 23, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
11-23-2021 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 10
8.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
November 23, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson.
2. INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMITTEE
1. INTERVIEWS OF DIVERSITY COMMISSION APPOINTEES HELM, SHIBAYAMA
AND WHITE
Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty introduced the Diversity
Commission appointees, Elaine Helm, Gracelynn Shibayama, and Robert White. He explained the
Diversity Commission interviewed six candidates and chose to appoint these three; the commission's
appointments are subject to Council confirmation. Their appointments will be effective January 1, 2022
through December 31, 2024. Following each interview, Mr. Doherty explained confirmation of the
appointments will be approved on the Consent Agenda. Councilmembers interviewed the following
candidates (responses in italics).
Elaine Helm
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she served on the Diversity Commission for the first five years. She
noticed Ms. Helm had a lot of organization affiliations that would be of interest to the commission. She
asked if she had time to serve on the commission, noting although there is only one meeting a week, there
are other activities. Yes, absolutely. I appreciate the question as it is important to understand the
commitment. Outside of my children's activities and a couple of my own, I do not have a lot of other
evening activities. I am confident I can make time and I'm proud to serve the City in this way.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked what are you most excited about when joining the Diversity
Commission? I look forward to hearing from the other commissioners and learning about their
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 23, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 11
8.1.a
experiences and opportunities to help the City whether that is in the community or within City
government, helping to make that more equitable. Just digging in and getting to know the other
commissioners is a big draw for me, being part of a very strong community of people who are committed
to making things better for everyone around them.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented her resume fits perfectly with the Diversity Commission, noting
her background in journalism and marketing and communication skills will fit in well. She relayed that
citizens are interested in distributing information outside the Bowl area. Do you have any marketing tools
to introduce to the commission? I'm excited to bring my professional marketing experience to the
commission. It's clear a lot of the work the commission does is related to education, information and
awareness which requires getting information out, especially beyond just the usual folks who are civically
engaged, finding ways to reach people who do not have time to call in or attend meetings in person,
finding ways to reach those folks where they are. I don't know what all the commission has considered in
the past regarding outreach tactics. I'm excited to learn what they have tried and offer suggestions for
reaching different parts of the population that they want to engage.
Councilmember Olson echoed Councilmember Buckshnis' comment about being impressed with that part
of her resume and feeling that it would bring a lot of value to the commission. She thanked Ms. Helm for
offering her time and talents, noting said she has all the same organizational affiliations with the
exception of being a member of her church. It has been a great path and she felt she knew a lot about Ms.
Helm knowing about her affiliations.
Councilmember Chen looked forward to having her on the commission and working with her. He asked
what was her number one idea to make the community more welcoming, inclusive and equitable? The
commission asked a similar question in the interview process and my answer was it is tough to come in as
the new person with big ideas and try to get them to the forefront right away. My approach in general is
to listen first and understand where the needs are. I certainly have ideas about where some of the needs
in the community might be. We've seen a lot throughout the pandemic and the events of last summer, an
awakening of awareness about racial inequity and racism in the country and some of those conversations
have occurred in Edmonds. It's important to not necessarily leap to solutions but spend time in the
community understanding what the needs are, who the interested parties are, and who is already doing
the work that might just need additional support or additional awareness brought to what they're doing.
Council President Paine said active listening will be an important ingredient in building community and
building trust. She had heard of Ms. Helm and knew of her from other parts of Edmonds and was pleased
she had put her name forward for the Diversity Commission and will be a welcome addition.
Gracelynn Shiba,
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she one of founders of the Diversity Commission and was on the
commission for five years. The commission is very challenging because a lot of work is involved; in
addition to one meeting a month, there are subcommittees and other activities that require support. She
asked if Ms. Shibayama had the time to do that. I definitely do. I am excited to be a part of the
commission, Edmonds is my backyard. I moved here in 2009 when it was still called Deadmonds. In the
last five years, I've committed to being more Edmonds focused and figuring out how I can serve the
community and make it a more courageous space for everyone.
Councilmember Buckshnis said Ms. Shibayama will be perfect for position; she has had an opportunity to
meet a lot of different people working at the ECA and she was pleased she applied for this position. She
asked if Ms. Shibayama planned to do something unique or did she have ideas about what she wanted to
do utilizing the ECA's work in diversity, equity and inclusion? I have a lot of ideas and I'm excited to
learn what is happening. As the ECA's Rental and Events Coordinator, I have a broader connection
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 23, 2021
Page 2
Packet Pg. 12
within and outside the community including Indian dance recitals, Hawaiian shows, etc. I was adopted by
a White family and grew up in a mixed race family. I want to find ways to have educational, exciting and
fun ways to teach families and people in the community how to talk to families and within families and
bring that to the forefront and also have fun with it.
Councilmember Olson recalled Ms. Shibayama introduced last Thursday's show at the ECA, Big Bad
Voodoo Daddy, and had as much energy as the performers which will be a delight for the Diversity
Commission and everyone.
Councilmember Chen said he has an Asian, Chinese American background and lives and has a business
on Highway 99. He was excited by her organization affiliations with the arts and Leadership Snohomish
County. One of his ideas is a cultural center on Highway 99 in the near future. He asked if she had an
interest in that or any ideas how to make that a reality. That would be an amazing thing, because
Edmonds is more than just the Bowl. You can drive 15 minutes and still be in Edmonds. I remember
something at an ECA staff meeting about having at satellite on Highway 99. With my connection to the
ECA and my passion about moving forward, I think I can help and I'm excited to figure out how.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she seemed like an excellent candidate and her passion clearly comes
through. She was pleased to meet her virtually and in person in the future.
Council President Paine said she was excited about her application. She loved the idea of bringing in her
experience as part of a mixed race family, a topic that isn't always brought forward but affects a lot of
families in the Edmonds area. Her passion for the arts and the community will add a lot to the
commission. She looked forward to working with Ms. Shibayama in the future.
Robert White
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed Mr. White currently serves as the chair of the Racial Equity
Committee for SVP, is an IDI qualified administrator and worked with DEI. She asked what SVP and IDI
were. SVP is Social Venture Partners and IDI is Interdependent Cultural Inventory Assessment.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said it looked like he had done a lot of work in this field and would be
good addition to the commission. The commission meets once a monthly as well as in subcommittees and
participates in special events. She asked if he had time for that commitment, noting he was retired but still
worked. After 20 years in the military, I understand how important time management is. I'm a high
performer, my mind doesn't shut off until late evening so I always have time to do things.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked what he was most excited about when joining the Diversity
Commission. I'm most excited by the opportunity to work with residents, City staff and Councilmembers;
few commissions/boards have the ability to interact and impact those areas of the community. I'm also
excited about how do we take Edmonds to the next level related to its commitment to racial equity and
social justice initiatives.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented on his fabulous resume, saying he was perfect for the Diversity
Commission. She noted here is a lot of PTSD and suicide which can impact diversity and inclusion. She
asked if he anticipated utilizing his skills to reach out to veterans to get that group more involved. I
already help the Heroes Cafe with their strategic planning and work with other organizations. Bringing
them into the fold is important as is being proximate to power, understanding what they've gone through
and their lived experiences. Having that proximity will help bring them to the fold; not just veterans
because actually more civilians have PTSD than veterans and need assistance.
Councilmember Chen said he was excited about the wealth of experience and knowledge he would bring
to the Diversity Commission especially his connection to veterans. People often think of diversity only as
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 23, 2021
Page 3
Packet Pg. 13
8.1.a
minorities, but it is related to everybody including veterans. He was glad Mr. White could bring his
connections and expertise to the Diversity Commission.
Councilmember Olson said she has had the pleasure of meeting Mr. White before and got to know his
story. She was excited he was a citizens of Edmonds and thanked him for joining the commission.
Council President Paine commented his background was impressive. She asked how he would address
intersectionality; with all the work he has done, what would be an effective approach? I've given a
workshop at Student Veterans ofAmerica about including veterans at universities and colleges. There are
so many different intersections, mixed race, veterans, etc., how you connect to those different
intersectionalities and understand each other's lived experiences; just because it didn't happen to you,
doesn't mean it isn't real. We need to work toward that intersectionality and understand that. Just
because I'm a veteran and someone else is a veteran doesn't mean we have the same lived experiences.
We need to look at everything holistically and work together. It is important not to create a table for
others to sit at, but to be invited to sit at other people's tables.
3. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 6:59 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 23, 2021
Page 4
Packet Pg. 14
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
12-07-2021 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 15
8.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
December 7, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Brook Roberts, Student Representative
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The
meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Buckshnis read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge
the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely.
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AMEND TO ADD ITEM 8.4, RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HOUSE BILL 1156,
RANKED CHOICE VOTING, TO THE AGENDA AND MOVE THE CURRENT ITEM 8.4 TO 8.5.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 16
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, FRALEY-
MONILLAS, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE
VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON, TO MOVE ITEM 8.1, PRESENTATION OF NON -REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES
COMPENSATION STUDY, TO NEXT WEEK'S PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled this went through the committee process four years ago and it should
be vetted at the committee level. This is only a presentation tonight without a recommendation and there
are other important items on tonight's agenda.
Councilmember L. Johnson pointed out there are consultants present for this item, therefore, the Council
should move forward as planned.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained not everything goes before committee; the committee does not
supersede the Council, the Council supersedes the committee. Understanding there are consultants
present, it would be a waste of tax dollars to not at least hear the report and the recommendation. She
encouraged Councilmembers to vote against the motion because there were consultants present to make a
presentation.
Council President Paine relayed her understanding that the presentation will include the methodology of
the compensation study and not the details. The details regarding the compensation study could occur at
the Personnel and Finance Committee meetings next week. She supported hearing the presentation
tonight, anticipating it would be a good education for Councilmembers.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the Council is meeting in Zoom and it is only 7:05 p.m. so the
consultants can easily leave the meeting and come next week. She anticipated tonight would be a very
long meeting and there were other items that needed to be discussed and voted on. She preferred to have
this reviewed at the committee level first.
Councilmember K. Johnson said as a member of the Personnel Committee, it was more appropriate to
first vet this through the committee process rather than the full Council followed by the committee. She
supported the motion and hoped other Councilmembers would also support it.
Councilmember Olson said these were good arguments for why this item should not have been scheduled
on the Council's agenda in the first place. However, now that it's scheduled, she asked if the consultants
would be available next week. She suggested having the consultant's presentation tonight and the review
at committees next week.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reiterated Council committees do not supersede the Council, the Council
supersedes the committees. She was willing to listen to the consultants and agreed with Councilmember
Olson that the discussion could occur at committee. She said cherry picking what should go to committee
or Council was fairly inappropriate and she encouraged Council to vote against the motion and hear the
consultant's presentation tonight and perhaps take it to committee next week.
Councilmember Chen said if the intent tonight was just to listening to the presentation and not make any
decision, he was willing to listen to the presentation. Mayor Nelson agreed that was the intent.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO MOVE ITEM 8.1, PRESENTATION OF NON -REPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION STUDY, TO PRESENTATIONS.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 2
Packet Pg. 17
8.2.a
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested if the City is paying consultants, agenda planning should have
placed this on the agenda as a presentation.
Councilmember Buckshnis said as it seems to be the will of the Council to listen to presentation, but it
should be under Presentations at the beginning of the agenda as all other presentations have been
throughout the year, not as Council Business.
Council President Paine expressed support for moving this to Presentations prior to Audience Comments.
Mayor Nelson restated the motion
TO MOVE THE NON -REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION STUDY FROM ITEM
8.1 TO ITEM 5.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised this is a substitute amendment to take the place of her first
amendment.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked whether the consultants were present and prepared to make their
presentation now. Looking at the agenda, they may have anticipated there would be a lot of public
comment before their presentation. HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson answered the consultants planned to
be here at 7 p.m. and were prepared to present.
Councilmember K. Johnson observed this item was scheduled for 45 minutes. As Council President
Paine indicated the consultant planned to only review the methodology, asked if the presentation could be
less than 45 minutes. Ms. Neill Hoyson anticipated the presentation which includes background,
methodology and initial findings would take about 30 minutes.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. PRESENTATIONS
1. PRESENTATION OF NON -REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION STUDY
HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson introduced Shannon Drohman, Principal, and Kathy Marek, Senior
Consultant, Compensation Connections. Ms. Drohman advised the presentation would take approximately
15 minutes. Ms. Neill Hoyson explained this project encompassed all the positions in the City excluding
the wastewater treatment plan which was studied earlier this year and the police positions. Tonight is high
level information so all Councilmembers understand the methodology as well as a brief preliminary
finding on Non -Represented employees. If the Council wants it vetted at the committee level, more
detailed data can be presented to committee; there is no detailed data in tonight's presentation.
Shannon Drohman explained the Council approved an updated compensation policy this summer which
included compensation goals; the policy and goals were a foundation for the market study. She reviewed:
• Compensation goals
o To attract and retain employees
o To pay employees fairly and to ensure pay equity and internal equity
o To be externally competitive by providing compensation commensurate with the labor market
o To be fiscally responsible and legally defensible
• Market Definition
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 3
Packet Pg. 18
8.2.a
o Policy defined the City's comparable labor market as cities in Washington State based on
population, assessed valuation, and assessed valuation per capita with a bandwidth of 50% up
and 50% down. We researched compensation market data for these comparable cities.
o Cities in Washington State
City County Population Assessed Valuation Per Capita
Issaquah King 38,690 11,966,058,762 309,280
Edmonds Snohomish 42,470 11,011,221,440 259,271
Bothell King/Snohomish 48,400 12,354,415,516 255,257
Mukilteo Snohomish 21,360 5,444,416,654 254,888
SeaTac King 29,180 6,965,017,090 238,691
Shoreline King 56,980 11,637,183,574 204,233
Lynnwood Snohomish 40,690 7,503,860,299 184,415
Puyallup Pierce 42,700 6,928,321,607 162,256
Burien King 52,300 7,794,662,044 149,038
Olympia Thurston 54,150 7,741,414,390 142,962
Lacey Thurston 52,910 7,268,934,236 137,383
o Other employers may be considered when relevant in the labor market
■ The policy also states that other local government agencies and private employers may be
taken into consideration when they are determined to be a relevant factor in the City's
labor market.
■ To round out the market data, we utilized additional published survey sources that reflect
employers of similar size to the City of Edmonds, in the public and private sectors.
- ERI - government
- CompAnalyst - government
- Milliman - government
- CompAnalyst - all industries
- Compdata - all industries
- Milliman - all industries
- Some of City jobs not in
■ Reflects broader labor market that City competes for talent
■ Some of the City's jobs are not in the other comparable city data.
Market Study Methodology
o Focus on job content and qualifications when matching, not just job titles
o At least 3 data sources per job
o Utilize the median (50' percentile) as the market reference point
Market Reference Point and Salary Scales
50th Percentile of Market
Minimum Midpoint Maximum
---- Pay Range ---
Salary Scale Findings and Recommendations
o Compared the current non -represented salary scale to the market data and found it to be about
6 percent below market. This is based on the overall market data for all of the city's jobs
compared to the current salary scale. So this recommendation is adjusting the whole salary
scale up to reflect the market.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 4
Packet Pg. 19
8.2.a
o We also looked at the placement of each job within the salary scale to determine if any jobs
might be a better fit in a different salary range, based on the market data. We found that 29
jobs move to a higher salary range.
o Recommend 29 jobs move to a different salary range
■ Administrative Services Director ■
Human Services Program Mgr.
■ Associate Engineer ■
IS Manager
■ Associate Planner ■
Park, Rec & Cultural Service Dir.
■ Building Official ■
Planner
■ Capital Projects Manager ■
Planning Manager
■ City Engineer ■
Police Chief
■ Comm Svc/Econ Dev Director ■
Public Works Director
■ Deputy Parks Director ■
Recreation Supervisor
■ Development Services Director ■
Senior Planner
■ Engineering Program Manager lI ■
Senior Utilities Engineer
■ Exec. Assistant To The Mayor ■
Stormwater Engineer
■ Executive Assist Confidential ■
Street-Stormwater-Manager
■ Facilities Manager ■
Transportation Engineer
■ Fleet Manager ■
Urban Forest Planner
■ HR Director
o We are seeing these types of changes, salary
structure changes and job placement changes,
right now with every employer we work with.
o If the Council implemented the proposed changes
for Non -Represented employees:
■ 39 people eligible for a pay increase
■ Total increase amount $220,409
■ Increase percent: 5% of salary budget
With regard to the process, Ms. Neill Hoyson explained when market adjustments were done in the past
with one of the bargaining groups, what was recommended and implemented looked at how the
individuals moved once the salary schedule was adjusted and the individual positions were adjusted. The
individuals were moved into their new range at the rate of a 1-step increase if their position moved 1-2
ranges, and a 2-step increase if the position moved up 3 or more ranges. She asked the consultants to be
consistent with what Council has approved in the past on the individual employee level which resulted in
the $220,409 impact. If the Council wished, the detailed information could be shared with committees
next week instead of returning to Council next week.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the comment, move everyone up, recalling the original consultants
developed a seven -step system. She asked if the consultant was suggesting abandoning the steps and
creating new ranges. She asked if the recommendation was to move the steps up or create a new system.
Ms. Drohman answered the same seven steps would be maintained and the dollar amount increased
within all the ranges in the steps. It would not change the framework or design, but increase the dollar
amounts within the schedule.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the Personnel Committee vetting this further. For
example, she was unsure what an Executive Assistant Confidential was.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said a Non -Represented Executive Assistant is someone like the
Mayor's or the Council's Executive Assistant, employees who maintain confidentiality. She referred to
the recommendation for a 5% increase and asked about the amount approved for the represented
employees. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered the Council has not yet had a bargaining strategy session to
discuss the results of the represented compensation analysis. Part of the purpose of having this
informational meeting prior to a bargaining strategy was so Council would have the information regarding
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 5
Packet Pg. 20
8.2.a
the background methodology. The changes to the represented positions will be discussed in a closed
bargaining strategy session.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas anticipated the represented employees would want 5% if the non -
represented employees received 5%. Approving raises for non -represented would be considered
aggressive bargaining because if the represented did not receive the same raises, there would be an
argument. Ms. Neill Hoyson suggested waiting to discuss that in a bargaining strategy session which is
part of the reason for a holistic look at all the positions rather than doing it piecemeal or doing the non -rep
separate from the represented. Normally per policy the Council would not be getting market data on the
represented staff and would make a decision about the non -reps because represented staff are typically
done during bargaining and no compensation study was done. The reason for the compensation study was
to allow Council to look at the information holistically and make a decision as a whole on the positions.
She anticipated Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' questions would be answered when information is
provided in the bargaining strategy session.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas anticipated whatever is given to the non -represented employees, the
represented employees will want more. This will cost more than 5% for the non -reps as there will also be
a cost for the represented employees.
Council President Paine advised she will put this on next week's Personnel Committee and Finance
Committee agendas for 30-45 minutes.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments. There is a public
hearing later on agenda regarding streateries; this is an opportunity to speak regarding anything else.
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, asked if the Council believed in the rule of law and in the oath they took
when they took elected office to uphold the laws and constitution of the United States and if so, why did
they dishonor it by voting for the Edmonds Tree Ordinance? She asked why the City had taken possession
of trees on undeveloped private property, forcing owners to buy them back from the City before their
property can be divided and trees removed to make room for new single family homes. It is a
discriminatory regulatory and financial governmental taking of private property. If the City wants their
trees, the City can buy them and should not make them pay for them twice. If a property owner is to
escape the illegal taking, they must retain 50% of significant trees on their property. It is arbitrary; they
are not allowed to use their property as zoned without extra arborist and engineering costs and they have
limited use. For them, it is more than 28 significant trees on each 1/3 acre lot. She questioned whether
Councilmembers had that many trees on their lots, whether they were able to see the sun from their homes
or have gardens, noting this ordinance does not allow new homeowners the privileges Councilmembers
enjoy. The excessive amount of trees required to be retained restricts natural sunlight and mountain and
Sound views from their homes.
Ms. Ferkingstad said they want to retain trees on their property but are required to buy their trees from the
City again before paying for removal to build single family homes on single family zoned properties. The
City needs more affordable single family homes; Edmonds is making it very expensive to build homes on
available single family zoned undeveloped property with unproductive fees and labor intensive
regulations. She urged Councilmembers to consider the burden they have placed on owners of
undeveloped property with the tree ordinance. Properties with trees have become nearly unsellable,
devalued by the number of trees growing on them. She requested equal treatment afforded to the builders
of all homes, including Councilmembers' homes, before November 2020. Should a class action lawsuit
occur, the City could be responsible or three or more times the financial damages caused to property
owners, a huge cost to all Edmonds taxpayers and the fault would lie with this Council. She urged the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 6
Packet Pg. 21
Council to follow the laws of the land and rescind the Edmonds tree ordinance, to consider the concern of
Edmonds' citizens when reminding them of laws stretched or broken while conducting Council business,
and to value the rule of law and uphold the laws of the constitution they wore to uphold. She thanked the
Council for their service and consideration of her comments.
Cynthia Sjoblom, Edmonds, said she did not want to be muzzled from speaking about streateries during
Audience Comments and she may have additional comments during the public hearing on streateries. She
expressed concern the public was not allowed to speak on November 16' if they spoke about the budget
on the 9ti'. She questioned increasing the Director of Development Services' salary when she was placed
at the top of the pay scale and thanked the Council for giving away taxpayers' money. She referred to
Mayor Nelson's letter to the editor, "Not Time to Pull the Plug on Streateries," and said the Mayor's role
was not to use the local media to influence his opinions; as an executive, his job was to handle the budget
and enforce the laws, rules and regulations of the City. She provided excerpts from comments on My
Edmonds News, Annette Border stated the streateries in no way enhance downtown. They detract from
the ambiance that was downtown Edmonds; Mark Cooper said asking three questions and guiding our
city's future from that is, well for lack of a better word, elementary. Take a real survey and get real
results. Stop playing like you don't have some agenda. The outside dining is unsafe, unfair, illegal and
doesn't meet health code.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order that Ms. Sjoblom was speaking to the public
hearing topic. Ms. Sjoblom said she did not think people could tell her what she can speak about during
general audience comments so "butt your nose out and let me finish." Mayor Nelson suggested the public
refrain from disrespectful language. Ms. Sjoblom continued, Tina Wilson said I would buy this argument
if the streateries weren't empty half the time.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas again raised a point of order about the subject of Ms. Sjoblom's
comments. Ms. Sjoblom said no one should be able to dictate what she says. Mayor Nelson said to give
everyone equal opportunity and not allow some to speak twice on the issue, there is a public hearing later
on the agenda regarding the streateries. Audience Comments are intended for any matter not pertaining to
streateries.
Ms. Sjoblom said there are people on the Council who do not give a damn about what the public wants,
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, Council President Paine, and Councilmember L. Johnson. Citizens are
sick and tired of how they constantly vote against the public and don't seem to care about what the
citizens want. Ms. Sjoblom alleged Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was signaling crazy and said she
planned to report it on the City's hate portal. She concluded her comments with "goodbye Monillas, good
riddance."
Kyle Weisbrod, Edmonds, a volunteer with Fair Vote Washington, thanked the Council for considering
the resolution proposed by Councilmember Olson to endorse HB 1156, the local option for ranked choice
voting. Democracy, election fairness and civic health are always important but particularly in this time
and ranked choice voting offers an opportunity to advance all of those. Washington State law currently
requires municipalities to use a top two primary system. In that system, all races with more than two
candidates on the ballot require a primary and the top two vote -getters in the primary then advance to the
general election and voters choose between those candidates. HB 1156 hopes to advance a proven
alternative to top two voting called ranked choice voting. hi ranked choice voting, voters rank candidates
by preference and first place votes are then tallied. If a candidate receives 50% of the votes, just like
before, they are the winner. However, if no candidates receive 50% of the vote, the last place candidate is
eliminated and voters who chose that candidate first have their votes allocated to their second choice
candidates. This process repeats until a candidate receives over 50% of the vote.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 7
Packet Pg. 22
8.2.a
Mr. Weisbrod continued, there are numerous benefits to ranked choice voting including cost reduction to
both municipalities and candidates and better representation for historically marginalized communities.
The biggest potential benefit is that ranked choice voting has been shown to elevate the content of
political campaigns. Candidates are incentivized to appeal to a broader portion of the electorate in hopes
of getting second and third place votes. Cities and states that use ranked choice voting receive more
positive campaigns and greater focus on solutions and common ground. The passage of HB 1156 would
simply give the City the option to use ranked choice voting; if it passes, the City can dig deeper into the
data and have a broader conversation with residents about whether it makes sense for them. Without HB
1156, the promises and potential of ranked choice voting will remain unavailable. He hoped the Council
would vote to pass the resolution and let Olympia know they should give Edmonds and other cities in the
state the option to decide what is best for its elections.
Ardeth Weed, Edmonds, Diversity Commission Member, said the commission has been honored to
offer the land acknowledgement before each of their monthly meetings. When the commission and staff
met with tribal representatives this past summer to prepare information for a potential Indigenous Peoples
Day observance in October, they were made aware that the current acknowledgement is not fully
inclusive of all tribes with historical ties to greater Edmonds which includes for example the Snoqualmie
Tribe. The current statement refers to the Tulalip Tribe and their successors; after discussion, the
commission offered a simple revision to the acknowledgement for City Council's consideration. Instead
of referring to the Tulalip Tribes and their successors which is not fully inclusive, the commission
suggests referring to the Coast Salish people. The land acknowledgement would then read as follows:
"We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Coast Salish people and their successors the
Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered on, and taken care of these
lands. We respect their sovereignty and their right to self-determination, and we respect their sacred
spiritual connection with the land and water." She said this simple change would make the tribes who
have not been included feel included. Next, she thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and
Councilmember Distelhorst for their service on the Diversity Commission and welcomed Councilmember
Chen to the commission.
Nathaniel Cook, Edmonds, volunteer with Fair Vote Washington, said in recent years he has come to
believe that ranked choice voting was one of the single most effective upgrades that could be made to the
political technology of the representative democracy. He thanked the Council for considering a resolution
supporting HB 1156. The ranked choice voting system of ranking candidates by order of preference
accomplishes a number of important tasks simultaneously. First, it eliminates the so-called spoiler effect
from elections between three or more candidates. Under ranked choice voting, voters who prefer a third
party or independent candidate can vote their conscience knowing that even if their first choice does not
receive enough votes to be considered a final contender, their vote will be reallocated to the next choice
among those remaining rather than being wasted. Giving voters this confidence can prevent the
phenomenon of vote splitting that helps more unified but less popular political factions to win elections
against larger consensus political factions with just a plurality of votes. Perhaps paradoxically, the same
features of ranked choice voting that make spoilers obsolete and favor political consensus building will
promote more diverse political thought, broadening voter choice and representation. When voters do not
feel the need to support one political extreme or the other to avoid the worst of two bad options,
alternative candidates can realistically expect to do well in elections based on the merits of their
individual policy ideas and character rather than their party affiliation. When candidates are incentivized
to win elections by actually addressing the concerns of their constituents rather than sticking to an
established party's one -size -fits -all slate of solutions, many more will do so.
Mr. Cook continued, ranked choice voting has been shown to increase the total number of candidates and
the number of candidates from under -represented groups winning elections in jurisdictions where it has
been implemented. Ranked choice voting can lead to more positive elections by encouraging cooperation
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 8
Packet Pg. 23
8.2.a
and even joint campaigning between like-minded candidates. Since ranked choice voting does not limit
voters to a single choice, candidates are incentivized to engage in affirmative issue -based campaigning
focused on shared concerns with their opponent's constituency rather than differences in order to rank
higher on their ballots. This results in less negative campaigning as shown in a 2013 survey in which only
5% of responding voters in three ranked choice voting cities thought candidates criticized each other a
"great deal" as compared to a fully 25% of respondents in non -ranked choice voting cities. He applauded
the Council for considering the resolution and hoped they would vote to pass it.
Eric Bidstrup, Edmonds, volunteer with Fair Vote Washington, a non -partisan, non-profit organization
advocating for ranked choice voting, supported the Council passing a resolution in support of HB 1156 to
allow local jurisdictions the choice to adopt ranked choice voting if they so desire. HB 1156 is about
enabling that local choice and does not force anyone to uses ranked choice voting. There are many
benefits of ranked choice voting hat Kyle and Daniel spoke to; for him, the most important benefits of
ranked choice voting is how it has proven to reduce contentious campaigning in these very contentious
times in the country and community and reducing negative campaigning and returning to more civil
discussions and debates on how best to meet the needs of the community. Ranked choice voting helps
reduce negative campaigning as candidates must campaign not only to be a voter's top choice but also
consider gaining support as a second, third or subsequent choice. Importantly, ranked choice voting is not
a partisan issue and has support from both republicans and democrats both nationally and across the state.
The Republican Party in Indiana, Utah and Virginia all used ranked choice voting in their 2020
conventions and legislators in Utah have just introduced legislation to adopt ranked choice voting for all
state and federal offices expanding beyond the 23 cities in Utah that already use ranked choice voting.
Mr. Bidstrup continued, in 2020, Virginia passed a local options bill like HB 1156 and both parties in
Virginia used ranked choice voting to select their candidates for the 2021 election. Many are crediting
that with selecting more moderate republican candidates that actually won their top office in that state.
San Francisco, Oakland, Minneapolis and most recently New York City in 2021 also adopted ranked
choice voting for city offices and Maine and Alaska have adopted ranked choice voting for all elections.
In Washington, HB 1156 also has bipartisan sponsors and has also received bipartisan support in the
House Committee on State Government and Tribal Relations as well as in the House Committee on
Appropriations. It is expected to come up to the House floor for a vote sometime after the legislative
session resumes in early January. HB 1156 is about simply enabling jurisdictions to choose ranked choice
voting if they want and does not force anyone to use it. He urged the Council to pass the resolution in
support of HB 1156 as well as including it in the Edmonds 2021 legislative priorities.
Carolyn Strong, Edmonds, said she would speak on streateries now because in the past, the rules
regarding who can speak during hearings was changed without notice and she was denied her right to
speak.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order. Mayor Nelson advised there was a public hearing
tonight regarding streateries and he promised she would be able to speak regarding streateries during the
public hearing. Audience Comments is for any subject that is not part of the public hearing. Ms. Strong
asked whether Mayor Nelson made that decision or whether the Council voted on it as last time the
Council voted to deny her right to speak during the public hearing.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised another point of order, suggesting Ms. Strong speak during Item
7.1. Ms. Strong said in the past, the Council chose to deny her that right and a list was created of people
who could not speak during the public hearing. She agreed to speak to the streateries later.
Ms. Strong said she was denied the right to speak during a public hearing without notice. She provided
comments during Audience Comments and then, without any notice, she was not given the right to speak
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 9
Packet Pg. 24
during the public hearing. She had prepared remarks for the hearing as did other people, but the Council
changed the rules and did not allow people to speak and did not provide any notice of that. She questioned
how people could trust that they would have an opportunity to speak during a public hearing in the future
when it can change at a moment's notice. She did not trust Mayor Nelson when he said she would be
allowed to speak as that was the Council's decision. She feared the Council President who did not allow
her to speak would do it again.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, advising Ms. Strong she was correct and many people
complained. It was a legislative decision but different Councilmembers were present today who would
probably not vote to have citizens' voices taken away. She suggested Ms. Strong wait until the public
hearing on streateries and provide her comments then. Mayor Nelson advised this is not an interactive
session but a comment section. This was not a point of order but was turning into a town hall. Ms. Strong
said she would take Councilmember Buckshnis' point and raise her hand to speak during the public
hearing.
Lora Hein, Edmonds, commended the Mayor and Councilmembers for their restrain and composure in
the face of uncivil and personal attacks levied by some members of the Edmonds community, many of
whom claim to speak for others. They do not represent her or many of the neighbors she knows
personally. In spite of their claims of being the majority, she believed most Edmonds residents were more
caring and considerate than what has been witnessed.
Larry Wilson, Edmonds, a resident on Daley Street, advocated for a flashing crosswalk sign on Daley &
9', a street with a 25 mph speed limit. He has witnessed people crossing into the opposing lane as he
crosses, has counted ten vehicles as he is standing in the middle of a lane, and Holy Rosary students also
cross there. He is not the only person with these complaints. He requested the Council advocate for a
flashing crosswalk sign at the intersection of Daley & 9r'', expressing surprise that Councilmember Olson
had not advocated for it. The only other place to cross is on Main and those living in Emerald Hills and
north will not walk that far. He has talked to the Traffic Engineer Mr. Hauss but is appealing to the
Council for their input into the situation.
Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, recommended giving 5% to both the represented and non -represented
employees as 5% is not that much of a raise particularly with the current and potentially future inflation.
She suggested ensuring all the positions are necessary. She relayed her understanding of the need to retain
trees to prevent water runoff into the Bowl. A resident of Five Corners, she has watched huge trees be
removed, including one where a bald eagle used to nest. She estimated half the trees on the hill have been
removed, trees that need to be retained to save the sewer system and the marsh. She referenced her own
yard, stating she was a master gardener and has been gardening all her life. She suggested paying
residents a good sum not to remove trees if they save a couple beautiful, majestic trees.
Dee Cooper, Edmonds, expressed frustration with bullying occurring in the community. She learned
when she speaks online to the Council and the public, she is being recorded and put on a TikTok which
she found really terrible, absolutely disgusting and bullying. A lot of members know about this as well as
Diversity Commissioners who have liked the page. A senior government official's wife also liked the
page at one point. She urged citizens of Edmonds to stop cyber bullying and she refused to be silenced by
this disgusting cyber bullying. Everyone has the right to speak their mind without being frightened or
threatened because a white woman spoke about something happening in Edmonds. She will report
everyone who liked the site as a hate crime so everyone knows who is involved in this. It is important for
all citizens to feel free to speak at a Council meeting without the threat of cyber bullying.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, said it may surprise some to find the City does not own the land that Mathay
Ballinger Park is on in its entirety. The play structure is partially located on right-of-way and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 10
Packet Pg. 25
8.2.a
modifications are only allowed by temporary limited use permit authorization from the Snohomish
County PUD. In 1968, the PUD secured a perpetual right to build an electric substation on property where
they are currently allowing park uses. From presentations made to the Planning Board on electric vehicle
standards, she understood that Highway 99 was an area of concern for utility upgrades. She was
presenting this information so the Council and those listening understand the limitations and risks to the
only existing park to serve the SR 99/Uptown area. There are no sidewalks leading to this park; the
adjoining spur trail is unlit, infested with evasive species and located within a graded utility corridor with
overhead powerlines. This corridor is closed on one end with no trespassing signs and is identified as the
only open space resource serving this community.
Ms. Seitz continued, the final resource serving this area is a .1 acre street end with a single bench
currently partially submerged in water. Every resource mentioned, every resource serving the SR 99
corridor is either wholly located or dependent on right-of-way. From its incorporation early 60 years ago,
the City has not invested in creating durable park resources for this area. The sheer amount of fee simple
acquisitions in the Bowl during this same timeframe is staggering. She urged the Council to create
durable fee -simple resources in the SR 99 corridor/Uptown area and other currently underserved areas.
She thanked the Council for the tremendous effort undertaken in the past few weeks. She thanked
Councilmember Distelhorst and welcomed Councilmember Chen and thanked both for seeking and
accepting positions on the Council.
Chris Ziobro, Edmonds, thanked electeds for enduring some of the previous comments. He agreed with
the last speaker about the lack of investments on the Highway 99 corridor and said the City should try to
improve that under -served area. With regard to trees, he is a fan of trees and lives in the northwest due to
the trees. Trees are important for soaking up carbon and add biodiversity. Trees are one of the reasons he
lives in this community and if he didn't want trees, he might choose to live in Eastern Washington,
Arizona or other treeless area. He would have a lovely view and would not have to clean his roof as often
if he cut down a bunch of trees but he chooses not to and recognizes that is part of the tradeoff. He
thanked the Council for protecting trees and hoped the protections were taken further, especially for the
older trees. Although not a volunteer with Fair Vote, he supported ranked choice voting and would love to
see Edmonds embrace it.
David Preston, Edmonds, Port of Edmonds Commissioner, welcomed everyone to visit the Lights of
Christmas at the Edmonds Marina that will be on through New Year's. The Edmonds Yacht Club has
done a fabulous job displaying lights on the boats. He invited all to view the lights and maybe stop at
Anthony's or Arnie's to enjoy some food. He wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Susan Hughes, Edmonds, said ranked choice voting is a bad idea and is a scheme to disconnect elections
from issues and allow candidates with marginal support from voters to win. It obscures true debates and
issue -driven dialogues among candidates and eliminates genuine binary choices between two top tier
candidates. It also disenfranchises voters because ballots that do not include the two alternate finalist are
cast aside to manufacture a false majority of the winner. For example, in 2008, instead of choosing to cast
one's ballot for John McCain, Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr or Cynthia McKinney, all of whom
were running for president, a voter would vote for all of them and rank their choice. In other words, all
five candidates would be listed on a voter's ballot from one to five with one being their first choice for
president and five being their last choice. If none of the candidates are chosen as the number one pick by
a majority of voters in round one, the presidential candidate with the lowest number of votes would be
eliminated from the ballot.
Ms. Hughes continued, people who selected that candidate as their top pick, for example, McKinney,
would automatically have their vote changed to their second choice. The scores would then be
recalculated over and over again until one candidate finally wins a majority as a second, third or even
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 11
Packet Pg. 26
8.2.a
fourth choice of voters. In the end, a voter's ballot may wind up being cast for the candidate he ranked
way below his first choice, a candidate with whom they may have strong political objections and for
whom they would not vote. Although she did not agree with a lot of former Governor Jerry Brown, he
was right in 2016 when he vetoed a bill to expand ranked choice voting in his state, saying it was overly
complicated and confusing and deprived voters of generally informed choice. Such a system would
present many opportunities to rig the electoral system. Ranked choice voting would destroy clear, known
choices as a political consumer. For example, if someone goes to the supermarket to purchase a steak
sauce, they ponder and research similar to what a voter does before casting their vote. When the consumer
reaches the checkout, they are told they have to accept the off -brand steak sauce because that was the one
that was finally voted on. In 2015, a review of 600,000 votes cast using ranked choice voting in 4 local
elections in Washington State and California found the winner in all 4 elections received less than a
majority of the total votes cast. She summarized there is something wrong with ranked choice voting and
it is a bad idea.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, echoed the recommendation for a traffic crossing light at 9t' & Daley, a great idea
and much needed. He also suggested a regular crosswalk be painted at the crossing of 7' & Daley,
another heavily crossed intersection with no crosswalk. Next, he questioned the new practice of
Councilmembers saying point of order during citizen comments. Having watched Council meetings for
many years, he has never seen that before and suggested asking a parliamentarian if that is proper use of
point of order and if citizen comments can be interrupted in that fashion. In anticipation of the November
16, 2021 public hearing on the budget, members of the public spent time thinking about and/or preparing
comments for the public hearing, unaware that Mayor Nelson was emailed a list of citizen names at 3:56
p.m. on November 16, 2021. Immediately before the November 16t' public hearing was open, Council
President Paine made a motion not to allow people who spoke on November 9t' to speak again. Council
President Paine had also pointed out during the November 9t' public hearing that extending the public
hearing would be a third opportunity for the public to comment on the budget. He was in attendance and
had his hand raised to speak during the entire duration of the November 16' public hearing, yet Mayor
Nelson refused to let certain citizens make public comments. His name was on the list of names Mayor
Nelson was emailed. He had no idea such an email existed until he was provided with it on November
30t' in response to a public records request.
Mr. Reidy continued, despite allowing one member of the public to speak who had spoken on November
9', Mayor Nelson continued to refuse to allow certain citizens to speak. Because Edmonds City
government has failed to set up its virtual meetings so the public can see who all is in attendance at the
public meetings, it is impossible for the public to see who else Mayor Nelson did not allow to speak on
November 16', the third opportunity for the public to comment on the budget. He asked if elected
officials were allowed to obstruct the public's ability to provide input on the budget during a public
hearing, whether the November 16t' agenda packet included new budget information not in earlier
Council's agenda packets, and why were certain people not allowed to comment about the new
information. He asked electeds to please stop obstructing good City government. Council President
Paine's motion on November 16t' was nonsensical, allowing all citizens to speak had no impact
whatsoever on allowing new voices to be heard.
Janelle Cass, Edmonds, echoed residents' frustration regarding cyberbullying. One hour ago,
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas accused her of calling in media to cover interviews on local streateries
and local businesses which was absolutely not true. She works close by and ran into a reporter from
FOX13. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas stated on the Facebook feed, I was told Cass called media. She
explained to her that she did not; she ran into them after their planned interview with Salish Sea Brewing.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas goes on to state on Facebook, Haha, I don't believe you it was just a
coincidence, liar. She then suggested Councilmember Fraley-Monillas should call the reporter from FOX
before spreading misinformation; her contacts at FOX13 told her she did. Councilmember Fraley -
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 12
Packet Pg. 27
8.2.a
Monillas' comments continued, I am done with the conversation, you disgust me, go on and do the Trump
thing and lying. Ms. Cass found these unsolicited accusations absolutely poor conduct from an elected
official, flat-out lying. She cautioned Councilmember Fraley-Monillas that she is setting an example for
youth and questioned her treating a citizen, business owner and veteran in that manner. She found her
conduct abhorrent and said citizens should expect more from Councilmembers. She suggested some
conversation about a complaint regarding her conduct which was unbecoming of a City Councilmember.
She thanked most of the other Councilmembers for their kind interactions.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.)
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested Items 6.1 and 6.2 be removed from the Consent Agenda so she can
abstain from the vote.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE ITEM 6.1, APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 16, 2021.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-0-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE
VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ITEM 6.2, APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 17, 2021.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-0-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE
VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said "I encourage Council let's move it."
Councilmember Chen pointed out Ms. Barnett's name on page 70 should be spelled "Erika." City Clerk
Scott Passey advised he would confirm the spelling and make the correction.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 23, 2021
4. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE
PAYMENTS.
5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS.
6. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY TO SIGN THE ADDENDUM TO THE
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT RELATED TO WRIA-8
7. 2021 BOARD & COMMISSION RETIREMENTS
8. 2022 BOARD & COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 13
Packet Pg. 28
8.2.a
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST TO EXTEND PERMITTING OF STREATERIES
Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin explained the existing ordinance sunsets on December
31, 2021. As mentioned during the previous meeting, the Washington Hospitality Association has
requested this extension, recognizing the pandemic has not ended and restaurants are still in a period of
recovery. She relayed cites throughout the world scrambled to manage the dynamic changes brought
about by COVID-19, a continuing health crisis. It was a unique opportunity for cities to collaborate with
each other and learn in real time how to adapt streets to serve public health and economic development
needs. She reviewed:
• Broad Impacts — local solutions
o Statements about Coronavirus
■ "Closing Streets for outdoor seating could provide a lifeline to Cleveland restaurants
struggling in the post-coronavirus city" May 2, 2020
■ "Berkeley may open streets, sidewalks and parks to allow outdoor dining. Restaurants
have been hard hit by COVID-19. Letting them set up tables outdoors would boost
business while maintaining social distancing
■ "N.J. could reopen outdoor dining, shopping inside nonessential stores within `a matter of
weeks,' Murphy says" May 20
o Photos of outdoor dining in Los Angeles, CA; New York City; Seattle, WA; Portland, WA;
West Palm Beach, FL
• NACTO: Streets for Pandemic Response and Recovery Guide
o Many cities that enacted streatery ordinance and programs took guidance from this collective
resource
o Addressed edge barriers, permit fees, accessibility,
Photos of outdoor dining in Washington: Walla Walla, Ellensburg, Spokane, Anacortes
Background
o March 2020: The COVID 19 pandemic placed restrictions on indoor dining
o June August 2020: After initial easing of restrictions in early summer, the Governor tightened
restrictions again in August 2020
o August 18, 2020 : In response the City announced a temporary ad hoc program by Special
Event Permit, starting on August 18, 2020, to allow curbside dining structures, aka "
streateries
o December 15, 2020 : As winter approached, and in light of continuing waves of COVID 19
and its related restrictions, the City Council passed Ordinance 4209 as an emergency measure
to protect public health and safety and formalized the allowance of streateries on a temporary
basis through 12/31/21
Permit Requirements
o Streatery permits required restaurant owners to provide:
■ Site plan
■ Dining plan (location of tables, chairs, heaters, etc.
■ Platform construction drawing
■ Elevation sketch
■ Certificate of Insurance (naming City of Edmonds as additional insured with minimum
$300,000 personal injury and $100,000 property damage)
o Streateries are required to have Traffic Safety Controls, such as barriers, reflective delineators
o Permits cost $110, with a $30 renewal fee.
o Limited to 20 streatery permits.
■ Currently, there are 17 existing streateries
Map of existing streateries identifying Wednesday Service
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 14
Packet Pg. 29
8.2.a
Existing Streateries
2
a
as e
sy
�� aT
16
M
14 ,
1
rt
2,
�m�3r 7 h , g
n �
g 9 8 1
aaa�ai way
10
tt
N112
13 g
— — M.aplc St
.y Brunch/Lunch
`a I Lunch/Dinner
Dinner
Closed
a
1. The Rusty Pelican
2. Santa Fe
3. The Loft
a Leftcratt
5_ Malze& Barley
6. mi" a
7. Fire & Feast
13-Tald Tiki
9. Mar-Ket
16, Engel's Pub
11, Salish Sea Brewing
12 Las Brisas
13. Barkada
l4. Chantrelles
t5-clalres
16. Salt & Iran
17. Daphnes
W i1
`I J J
• 6treatery rermit Log
0 16 of 17 streateries have permits
0 1 has yet to pull a permit, staff has reviewed it and sent an order to correct.
o Each streatery went through a thorough review including engineering inspection which
considers traffic control devices, building inspection which looks at the stability of the
streatery structure and fire department review and inspection
o Once permits were issued, each were inspected
• Streatery Fee Comnarison
Jurisdiction
Streateries
Allowed
Sunset
Date
Permit Fee
Bellevue
Yes
Thru 2022
$436 $238 plan review + $198 for inspection)
Langley
Yes
Spring
2022
Waived. None established
Seattle
Yes
Thru 2022
No fee: subsidized with ARPA money
Spokane
Yes
Permanent
Annual license $100; modification to permitted plan
$250; application fee $50, review fee $300, parking
mitigation, metered $2.09/sf per month and time -
restricted free parking $1.05/sf per month
Anacortes
Yes
Permanent
Waived. None established
Madison
Yes
Permanent
Waived. None established
Los Angeles
Yes
Permanent
Waived. None established
Renton
Waived. None established
Everett
Yes
Waived. None established
Ellensburg
Yes
Thru 2021
Waived. None established
Walla Walla
Yes
Thru 2023
Waived. None established
• Streateries Ordinance 4209
o Streateries Ordinance 4209, approved by Council on 12/15/2020 was originally set to sunset
as of 12/31/21.
o City Council has the authority to extend the Ordinance into 2022
o The COVID 19 pandemic is not over, which is more apparent with Omicron variant. The
following language in Ordinance 4209 is still relevant:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 15
Packet Pg. 30
a
8.2.a
■ "...this ordinance should be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public
health, safety and welfare by staving off restaurant failures and creating program so that
Edmonds citizens will have safer places to dime for the remainder of the COVID-19
pandemic."
Community Services & Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty reviewed:
• Public Opinion
o Public Survey
■ 4,106 people took the survey
o Four questions
1. Thinking about your personal use of streateries for eating and drinking in downtown
Edmonds, please select one of the following:
■ 67.15% of respondents have regularly or occasionally used streateries
2. Please answer the following question if you answered "regularly," "occasionally" or
"seldom" to Question 1. How likely would you be to continue to use streateries for eating
and drinking in 2022 if they were still present?
■ 70.25% of respondents are likely or very likely to use streateries in 2022 if they are
available
3. If outdoor dining in streateries is no longer available, which of the following options
most closely describes your expected eating/drinking habits in Downtown Edmonds
during the first six months of 2022?
■ 46.32% of respondents are likely to continue to visit Downtown restaurants, choosing
to eat indoors
■ 53.68% of respondents are likely to visit Downtown restaurants less frequently or
choose to go elsewhere
■ NOTE: "Less frequently" encompasses both the occasions when people may visit the
small number of restaurants Downtown that have outdoor dining options not housed
in streateries , resulting in less frequent overall visits to Downtown; as well as when
people may visit all restaurants, even without streateries , but do so less often as they
feel uncomfortable about dining indoors.
4. All things considered, do you believe outdoor dining in streateries (choose one of the
following): enhances downtown, makes no difference, detracts from downtown?
■ 58.96% believe streateries enhance downtown
o Public Survey Takeaways
■ Majority of public uses streateries
■ Majority of public will continue to use streateries if available in 2022
■ Majority of public believes streateries enhance Downtown Edmonds
■ Majority of public will visit Downtown less frequently or go elsewhere for
eating/drinking if streateries are discontinued
• Research
o Downtown merchants sales revenue
■ Summer 2021 compared to summer 2019
- 2021: $12,645,307
- 2019: $11,513,315
■ Overall, merchants are up - 110% of summer 2019, pre -pandemic levels
o Main Street Retailers
■ Random sample of 23 retailers
- Of 17 with complete data for summer 2021 compared with summer 2019
• 12 at 100% or higher
• 4 at 90-100%
• 1 at below 90%
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 16
Packet Pg. 31
■ A small number of retailers not included in the random sample may have seen lower
sales, per anecdotal information...
o Restaurants' impact on commercial districts
■ Restaurants serve as "anchors" or attractions for Downtown Edmonds, thereby enhancing
pass -by traffic and shoppers for nearby retailers.
■ Restaurants attract many more frequent, repeat visitors. People come to Downtown
Edmonds multiple times over the course of a month for coffee, lunch, ice cream, brunch,
dinner, drinks - every time passing by retail shops that they may visit or at least "window
shop."
■ Shopping center managers recognize this synergy and have increased the proportion of
being eating/drinking establishments up to 30% 40% or higher in today's centers. It has
resulted in higher foot traffic and more sales for centers in recent years.
Consideration of Extending Ordinance — Next Steps
o City Council may consider extending the Streateries Ordinance
o Public hearing scheduled this evening
o Council can begin review after today's public hearing on 12/7/21 and continue consideration
until 12/14/21 regular meeting
Ms. McLaughlin reviewed:
• Draft ordinance
o Streateries will not be able to be extended beyond the expiration date of the new ordinance
(May 31, 2022):
■ A streatery shall be pet:mit4ed for- a period of no mer-e than one yeaf, provided tha4 the
permit may be extended in threete-up to six month increments, PROVIDED THAT no
streatery may continue to operate or hold space in the right of way beyond the sunset
date in subsection 6.p, below, regardless of the expiration date set forth on the permit.
■ This subsection C_6 shall sunset on per May 31, �f 2022, • Foss the off etive
date is ehanged by aetion of the City Cetmeil.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested staff provide the PowerPoint to the Council.
Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing and described the procedures.
Rim Benoud-Schmitz, Edmonds, recalled a concerning comment at the last Council meeting where
streateries were discussed regarding leveraging comments posted on Facebook and My Edmonds News to
influence the decision whether or not to extend streateries. She asked that the Council recognize that
comments posted on online forums such as Facebook only represent a subset of the population and should
not be interpreted as an accurate pulse of Edmonds citizens. She asked that the Council keep in mind the
concept of the vocal minority and silent majority and how online commentary tends to amplify negative
viewpoints. She and her husband enjoy having the streateries as an option and given the latest COVID
variant, she would appreciate having the Council extend streateries further into 2022.
Cynthia Sjoblom, Edmonds, referred to the Diversity Commission member who called in to thank
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, asking if the caller was aware that tonight Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas disrespected an Hispanic woman. Mayor Nelson requested her comments pertain to the public
hearing topic. To Ms. McLaughlin, she said Edmonds does not need to compare itself to other cities and
the umbrellas shown are a far cry from 2x4s and plastic. She requested Edmonds be allowed to be
Edmonds and not someplace else. She questioned why some in government have an agenda to keep
streateries. The Council has the right to sunset the streateries. It appears restaurants are using streateries as
overflow in some instances and people have brought their dogs to streateries, which is unrelated to
COVID. The survey is disingenuous because it allows multiple entries. She relayed comments from
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 17
Packet Pg. 32
others: Tina Wilson said, she would buy this argument if streateries weren't empty half the time. It seems
like the restaurants are doing fine. If you want to eat outside in the cold, sit somewhere there is already an
existing patio. Mark Landau says, it seems like the City is giving unfair advantage to the restaurants in the
Bowl.
Ms. Sjoblom continued, Gwen Lewis said, maybe the people who think eating outside in the cold is great
could do that on their own patio or deck at home. Clinton Wright said, I just learned elsewhere that the
Edmonds restaurants combined have received over $4,300,000 in federal COVID relief funding from the
various sources. James Lockhart said, I do not understand how the mayor could come up with his
extensive data from the few questions that were asked in the survey that was provided. It's still hard to
walk downtown sidewalks with the sheds in place. Brian Drechsler said, if Mayor Nelson is going to
promote theses eyesore shacks, the least we can do is give them their proper name just like Hooverville
shacks of the depression. They should be called the Nelsonville shacks. Kristi Urquhart said, Ken Reidy
for Mayor. Mark Bucklin said, Mayor Nelson claims the majority of the public will patronize downtown
restaurants less if the streateries are removed. Where did he pull that from? What study can he site? Matt
Richardson said, Mark, the Mayor manufactures consent with push polls. Brian Potter said, gas heaters
are the equivalent of about 37 cars idling in downtown Edmonds so if you care about the climate and you
care about your citizen voters, do the right thing.
Fred Milani, Edmonds, said he has done everything in his power to demonstrate how streateries have
been hurting other businesses, adding to unsafe driving conditions and making beautiful downtown streets
into streets that would be found in Tijuana, Mexico. Propane cannisters sitting next to tables are bombs
ready to blow if a driver swerves to avoid an accident with a pedestrian or another car or someone
pushing on the gas pedal instead of the brake which happens from time to time and jams a car into a
house, living room or a building lobby or a streatery. When these propane canisters blow up, hopefully
there would not be a chain reaction, destroying portions of stores and body parts all over. He was unsure
why the fire department was looking the other way over such a dangerous situation. The whole idea of
fire prevention is to eliminate the remote chance of something unexpected happening, whether by a
fireplace, in a restaurant kitchen or on the public street. The single propane canisters that people are used
to seeing at a backyard barbeque are mostly housed in a brick or metal structure near the barbeque. The
propane canisters in streateries are open, not protected by steel beams bolted to the street and sitting next
to open flames. The City's economic development office could do a better job of informing the public that
many Edmonds restaurants offer private, heated, outdoor patio dining spaces.
Mr. Milani continued, citizens coming from out of town should be safe and Edmonds should not put their
lives in danger by seating them in the street and around unprotected propane canisters. Street parking
should be made available for retail shops and handicapped visitors. If the City Council votes to keep
streateries and believes they are not causing parking problems, he encouraged all retail stores to partner
with neighboring stores to erect shoplets in the street and let the City quickly find out how many visitors
can get into downtown Edmonds when there are no parking spaces left. After all, retail stores were all
impacted by COVID just as like restaurants and they could use free real estate to expand their
merchandising. He implored the City Council to erase the streateries and any memories of them from the
City. There are no more reasons to help the selected few and there are many reasons to help many more
who are still impacted by COVID. Most of the streatery operators have also received hundreds of
thousands of dollars in government assistance. John Lane from Washington Hospitality Association is
doing his job to promote restaurants, disregarding theaters, retailers, etc.
Steven Schmitz, Edmonds, spoke in favor of continuing streateries in Edmonds until they sunset or until
they are extended as a permanent addition to the City. He enjoys dining in restaurants that have streateries
as well as those that do not. Many Edmonds residents feel streateries are functional, useful and extend a
pleasant place to be on the street where they can see their neighbors and other members of the public in a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 18
Packet Pg. 33
8.2.a
public right-of-way which they have little use of other than the driving lanes. On an average street, over
half the roadway is taken up by vehicle traffic, making it a no-man's land for most. The few feet of
sidewalk on the downtown streets are so constrained as some mentioned by streateries although he hated
to see people walking in the parallel parking stalls unless it was during the market. He supported turning
over more of the public right-of-way to the citizens of Edmonds as useful, functional public spaces like
restaurants, businesses that sell flowers and books, and even the movie theater if they wanted to set up
outside.
Mr. Schmitz implored the Council to encourage businesses to help develop legislation as a permanent
solution for all businesses, not just in the Bowl but all of Edmonds, so the public can enjoy more of the
public rights -of -way as an extension of the public park system. He pointed out the difficulty of expanding
the park system into private properties due to high prices when the City already owns 1/4 of the land in the
City in the public rights -of -way. With regard to propane and things exploding, he was unsure why those
red flags had to be raised when this was clearly a good thing for the City to have. He appreciated other
points of view, but felt the streateries were a good thing for the City.
Chris Ziobro, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the streateries including making them permanent as they add
to the community, are a more equitable option for people who want to eat out and enjoy downtown but
cannot go inside for a number of reasons including the pandemic, but even post -pandemic, they will add
value. He recalled while eating with his family downtown this week, they had conversations with multiple
people they knew as they walked by, something that would not have happened if they were indoors. He
supported having the streateries made permanent so businesses could invest in them and make them more
architecturally pleasing, cozier, safer or nicer. A lot of the reason the streateries look this way is because
they are temporary and why would a restaurant invest a lot of money when they are disposable. The trend
is pro -curbside parklets; San Francisco has been doing it for many years and the data supports the benefits
to the community. He did not participate in the survey, but ironically he has eaten out more during the
pandemic than pre -pandemic.
David Preston, Edmonds, commented the discussion seems to be two extremes, keep the streateries with
no changes or get rid of them all. He suggested considering options in between such as modifying them
by reducing the size, moving them onto the sidewalk, or changing the direction of walking into the
parking space. The retailers are being left out of the conversation to some degree; perhaps retailers and
restaurateurs, the key stakeholders, could get together to develop and propose a plan to Council. The
space streateries occupy is public space and he would like to have more public parking so when he visits
the retail shops, he can find parking.
Lora Hein, Edmonds, said the COVID pandemic is not over yet. The Council has juggled many different
decisions over the past year. Driving through neighboring communities, she has seen their alternative
outdoor dining structures, a haphazard jumble compared to Edmonds' simple addition to the festive air
downtown. She commended Edmonds for the level of uniformity and attractiveness displayed downtown.
Some streateries had outlived their usefulness and it may be time to sunset them on a case -by -case basis.
It behooves individual establishments to demonstrate need if they are to continue. Those establishments
that have onsite outdoor dining alternatives that do not infringe on street parking and sidewalks need to be
the first to be dismantled. Others could choose either sidewalk seating or a streatery to allow pedestrian
more space for passing. Perhaps the unneeded structures could be relocated and used by other businesses.
She took issue with those who say restaurants have had an unfair advantage; in no other retail location is
removing masks necessary for clientele to frequent and support their business.
Ms. Hein continued, while flaming towers add additional glimmer to the sparkling winter scene
downtown, when not in use to warm diners, their excessive use of polluting fossil fuel consumption
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 19
Packet Pg. 34
8.2.a
should be disallowed. She added a perspective on what many call a parking problem; she has never had to
park more than 2-3 blocks from her destination. She enjoys the opportunity to stroll and enjoy the lights
and window displays of occupied storefronts. The City's shopping and dining center is doing well as
evidenced by throngs on the streets and many full parking spots as well as the information provided in the
presentation about how well businesses are faring. Edmonds may be the envy of other communities for
how it is doing in these challenging times. She thanked the Council for their hard work to keep Edmonds
vibrant during the unpredictable changes thrown at all during recent months.
Tamara Nelson, Edmonds, spoke in favor of sunsetting the streateries. After the blowback from the
video that Janelle Cass took a lot of time and effort to create and a comment that it was too late for older
citizens, she took a walk this evening and found there were a total of three parties between all the
restaurants invading the streets and sidewalks. Epulo, Hamburger Harry's, Birardi's, Feast & Fire,
Kahlo's and Demetris all have outdoor seating and a variety of foods so the comments that there are no
other options if streateries are removed is untrue. The streets and sidewalks belong to the residents and are
funded with tax dollars; they are not free space for restaurants and charging for the use of the space will
not benefit taxpayers. Her freedom does not end where someone else's fears begin. She referred to
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' absurd comment that the streateries were as safe as a building if a car
plowed into them. She suggested imaging if a Councilmembers' child or grandchild was sitting in one of
the plastic sheds and a car plowed into it, a car accident does not necessarily happen at the end of the
shack. It would be horrendous and they also create sight limitations. She summarized it was time for them
to go.
Erika Barnett, Edmonds, Salish Sea Brewing Company, said they operate businesses on the corner of
5t' & Dayton as well their new Boathouse Taproom in Harbor Square and have been in business in
Edmonds for over 8 years, occupying approximately 10,000 square feet of business real estate and
employ over 30 staff between the 2 locations and are in favor of maintaining the streateries outside dining
program. Their desire in keeping them open is to maintain safe dining options for their customers during
this period of health environment uncertainty. The streateries are a welcome addition and are necessary
during the pandemic which is not over. Their customers have repeatedly stated how much they appreciate
their providing safe, outside dining. They have also heard recently that people choose to meet outside
when meeting with friends, coworkers or family members who are not part of their current circle as it
eliminates concerns about transmission and allows sociability that everyone has missed over the past year.
If stricter lockdown are reinstituted, they would have to turn customers away who are unable to meet
specific mandates, preventing them from providing equal access to their customers. She recognized some
businesses have their own patios and street -side dining but not all restaurants do. This does not need to be
an all or nothing decision; as with any program, learning occurs and course corrections can be made to
adjust to concerns. Most restaurants would be willing to address inequities and come up with a plan to
allow them to continue to provide outside dining, not just the few who have the luxury of having their
own private dining patios, but for those who the streateries program is their only way to provide outdoor
dining and maintain the vibrance and vitality that restaurants bring to the downtown environment.
Jeff Barnett, Edmonds, encouraged the public to shop local, shop at local retailers, eat at local
restaurants, and support Edmonds. For a complete copy of the comments sent to Council, the Mayor's
Office and Patrick Doherty, he invited the public to see the article in today's Edmonds Beacon.
Jen Lawson, Edmonds, owner of Crow Boutique and President of Downtown Edmonds Merchants
Association (DEMA), said the streateries concept was important in keeping the doors open for many
restaurants when indoor dining was not an option in 2020. Restaurants have now been at 100% indoor
capacity since July and the need for the structures as originally intended is greatly reduced. Additionally,
more than a dozen restaurants already provide safe outdoor dining onsite so there are lots of options for
those who are not ready to dine inside safely. Should the Council vote to continue the program, the only
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 20
Packet Pg. 35
fair and equitable solution is to charge rent on these structures. In speaking with some restaurant owners,
they would be open to paying a fee for continued use of the parking spaces and agree that retailers have
been impacted the most by the loss of parking. The majority of restaurant owners and retailers are seeing
eye -to -eye on this; any perceived drama is overblown and not conductive to compromise. Should the
Council vote to keep the streateries and not charge them a reasonable fee, it would send a clear message
that the retailers' needs come second to those of restaurants. DEMA and its members look forward to
working closely with the City and the Council to ensure all business downtown thrive and succeed.
Janelle Cass, Edmonds, said while she struggled to recognize this as a valid public hearing due to the
lack of a vote to have this public hearing, she wanted to share her concerns about streateries. She
adamantly supports all businesses in Edmonds and originally thought streateries were a great idea and a
lifeline to this vital part of the economy and charm of Edmonds. However, restaurants are now full inside
and the usage of streateries is minimal, yet they occupy the public right-of-way 24/7 which means these
public spaces are not being used equitably and shared amongst all businesses and patrons. Over the past
few days, she took a few videos of the usage at various times of day to better understand the issue. She
provided a synopsis of what she observed: she witnessed three businesses that seemed to be using the
streateries only because they lack adequate seating inside or in their own outdoor seating for all their
clientele. In other words, it does not have to do with COVID but rather improving their bottom line. Many
restaurants have their own outdoor seating and a streatery as well as patrons dining inside; at what point is
this about greed and not about what is best for the community? Several local restaurants have streateries
and have expanded to multiple locations during the past year; again, is this about COVID or bottom line?
Ms. Cass said she witnessed propane heaters being used for empty tables which, thanks to a My Edmonds
News LTE, everyone knows of their significant impact on carbon emissions. She observed treacherous
sidewalk conditions for those with mobility issues and limited widths that force pedestrians to squeeze
together and not maintain social distancing. The most concerning thing she noticed was the sheer lack of
safety; one of the streateries had an unfilled water barrier, several had empty, thin wood planter boxes
where barriers should be or filled planter boxes elevated precariously on top of bricks. Most disturbing
was these filled planter boxes do not prevent impact damage from slow moving vehicles. She witnessed a
person departing a parking space backing into a streatery which pushed the thin streatery wall up against
the table and chairs; imagine if a patron was sitting there. This is clearly unsafe for patrons and a huge
liability for the City as they are the ones approving and supposedly inspecting the design of the planter
boxes. She encouraged the Council to allow the emergency ordinance to sunset for the safety of visitors
and patrons and to get rid of unsafe, unfair structures using the City's streets.
Eric Goodman said he has used the streateries and will continue to use them and believed they were
good for the community. To the comments about safety, he said streateries are a fixed object and cars are
the moving object so it is the cars that are unsafe. It would be great if the City could shut down Main and
have it be a public space for people to enjoy the downtown and shop at all the stores and let kids roam
around without worrying about them being hit by a car. He urged the Council to keep the streateries and
considering making them permanent and consider allowing other businesses to use some of the public
space. He was in favor of charging for use of the space and not giving away public land for free. As a
public planner and certified member of AICP, he was also in favor of safety measures. Data shows giving
space to people is beneficial and will generate more tax revenue and help businesses do better, make
people happier by allowing them to meet their neighbors and socialize more. He supported giving more
space to people and less space to cars; giving 17 spaces back to cars will not help anyone find a parking
space in front of the store they want to visit. There are things that can be done to make parking available,
but this is not the way to solve that issue.
Brad Bernatek, Edmonds, said his family is the proud owner of one of the oldest homes in Edmonds on
Main Street and care deeply about maintaining the character of Edmonds. He supported extending the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 21
Packet Pg. 36
8.2.a
streateries for another six months given the uncertainty with the COVID variant and lack of a vaccine
mandate inside in Snohomish County. Streateries enhance the neighborhood and he would be less likely
to visit restaurants and bars without an outside seating option. Respondents to the survey thought the
streateries enhance downtown Edmonds by a 20 point margin and over 50% of the respondents would be
less likely to visit restaurants without an outside option. He applauded the City for being responsive to the
challenges that local restaurants have faced due to COVID, creating options for friends and family to
socialize safely throughout the pandemic. He was taken aback at the divisive language and
misinformation around this issue. He acknowledged a significant minority of Edmonds residents do not
share his point of view and there are valid concerns that need to be addressed such as equity, safety, and
parking if the streateries become permanent. He hoped to have this discussion without inflammatory
language or highly misleading videos. It would be incredibly disruptive to local businesses to eliminate
streateries in three weeks; the best strategy is to extend streateries for another six months. He also
suggested a comprehensive assessment of all downtown businesses be completed in mid-2022 to address
the valid concerns. He thanked the Council and Mayor for their time and service.
Carolyn Strong, Edmonds, said she toured all the streateries in downtown Edmonds last Saturday
between 8 and 9:30 p.m., Monday at noon and between 5:30 and 7 p.m., and today between 12:30 and 2
p.m. On Saturday night, almost all the open restaurants and bars were busy with patrons inside, some
quite crowded; streateries were nearly empty or empty except for one bar that had very little indoor
seating and was simply expanding their restaurant into the public street. On Monday, one streatery was
used for overflow from a packed restaurant for lunch, maybe 2-3 couples for dinner who brought their
dog along, and a bar with people outside with camera crews from Q-13. Today she saw two streateries
utilized for a very short period of time. She heard a car back into a streatery on Monday; the damage
caved in the bottom of the side panel, pushing it up against the table. When she was taking pictures today,
two people were sitting at that table and could have been injured if they were sitting there when the
accident occurred. She provided her takeaways: the streateries are dangerous. A car going about 2 mph
did significant damage to a streatery. What will happen if one is hit at 25 mph? Many intrude heavily on
the sidewalks, making it hazardous and difficult to navigate and one often feels they are walking through
the middle of a private establishment when walking down a public sidewalk.
Ms. Strong continued, usage of the streateries is extremely limited, yet they take away parking for every
resident and surrounding retail and business all day long year-round. Edmonds used to accommodate
retailers and services' parking during the day and restaurants parking in the evenings with a couple hour
overlap. Now the restaurants take up the majority of parking all day every day all year. How many
restaurants would be willing to reserve empty tables all day every day waiting for a guest who might
arrive, like the streateries reserve these parking spaces 24/7 year-round waiting to use them maybe two
hours a day? Few restaurants are even open 7 days/week or during the day. These restaurants are
exercising privilege; one of the restaurateurs already received nearly $2 million taxpayer dollars for
COVID relief, others received several hundred thousand. Now the City is giving up the charm too? While
she supported restaurants and wanted them to succeed, the time has come to end the privileged use of
public spaces. She pointed out anyone can scam a poll; the already slanted poll can be taken countless
times by any one individual using an incognito tab so they have absolutely no bearing or scientific data.
Alex Marek said he works in a lot of the restaurants in downtown Edmonds and supports the streateries.
A lot of his coworkers have jobs because of the streateries. They hear every day from clients that they are
happy they have that option, it makes families feel safer. The staff presentation had lot of good points and
he agreed with all of them. More business in downtown Edmonds means more business for retailers and
revenue generated by the streateries is more tax revenue for the City's budget. He summarized streateries
were a great thing and he hoped they continued.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 22
Packet Pg. 37
8.2.a
Trey Clugston said he was one of the younger people speaking today. Growing up in Edmonds for the
past 15 years has been great, watching it go from being called Deadmonds to what it is now. He supported
the streateries, finding them probably the best thing Edmonds has done outside of the Saturday Main
Street closings which he felt should continue. He acknowledged the streateries could use work and could
be made safer, but that is a long term addition. He did not think the 12 spaces the streateries occupy make
a difference to the retailers because people can walk, they have legs. Retailers are not competing with
parking spaces but with Amazon and other online retailers because people do not shop locally anymore.
He has shopped locally more in the past two years than he has before. He supported retaining the
streateries and hoped the Council could look to the future and not just the past because Edmonds does not
need to drown in its history.
Tina Castillo, Edmonds, appreciated the use of streateries in the last 11/2 years. She and her husband both
work in healthcare and like to keep themselves safe in this environment with a lot of airflow and eating
outside. The streateries have made them, their coworkers and friends feel a lot safer. She hoped the
Council would continue the streateries program.
Jim [no last name given], said he has been waiting to speak for two hours and at least two people spoke
twice before he had an opportunity to speak. He expressed concern with the temporary shacks as he called
them. Current collision barriers are inadequate to prevent a car driving 20 mph from causing damage and
possibly injury to people sitting in the shacks. The traffic control devices in place probably do not meet
OSHA standards. When he did traffic control, they were required to use an attenuation device to protect
the driver and the worker behind it or in this case patrons. He did not know the exact standards that were
needed but what is there now is woefully inadequate. Second, the outdoor propane heaters are not
intended to be used in partially enclosed spaces. Toxic fumes containing cancer causing agents, benzine,
formaldehyde, and acetylide plus carbon monoxide, all of which can cause fetal death and birth defects
along with other illnesses and even death. OSHA has exposure rules to protect against possible harm. He
questioned whether the shacks had been tested for toxic levels. Detectors that can be purchased at the
hardware store do not provide that level of detection, only special equipment can determine if it is safe for
people to be inside. He acknowledged the greenhouse gas emissions of 37 cars idling continuously. It
seems the community is divided on whether to keep the streateries or get rid of them. The only
compromise is to charge rent for the space, $1500/month for 200 square feet per parking space and the
proceeds be given possibly to the food bank to address inequalities in the community.
Susan Hughes, Edmonds, referred to a number of comments and opinions in My Edmonds News
regarding the streateries, many based on feelings and not facts. Some very specific facts need to be
repeated because decisions should be made on facts and not on feelings. The facts presented in My
Edmonds News comments indicate streateries are an eyesore in Edmonds, quite a few parking spaces
have been removed, delivery trucks have to block the street due to streateries, streateries only benefit a
few businesses, and the 36 propane heater are bad for the environment equivalent to 37 cars sitting in
downtown Edmonds running for 2 hours every night. This should be a major issue for anyone with
concern for climate change and they should not support them. For those concerned with being inside a
restaurant unmasked for food and drink, there is a 1 in 84,000 chance they are not safe. For someone with
health concerns, their chances may be far worse but they would not go sit outside in Edmonds in the
winter if their health was precarious. The odds of being killed by a car while walking in Edmonds are
twice as high as getting COVID in a restaurant outbreak in Snohomish County.
Ms. Hughes continued, she drove through downtown Edmonds on Friday evening at about 7:30 p.m. and
saw only a total of four people in all the streateries. Facts and logic need to be applied, not feelings. She
referred to the graph that indicated 46% of people would continue to go to downtown Edmonds which
was combined with another response to result in a higher percentage, skewing the data. She pointed out
Salish Brewing has an outside seating area but now also have a streatery which has given them quite bit
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 23
Packet Pg. 38
more seating at no cost which she felt was greed. She concluded Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was a
vile, disgusting person and she was thankful a huge majority of Edmonds citizens realized this and booted
her out.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, believed that weak city government divides citizens and business owners by
helping some while harming others. He asked for the City Code section that allows city staff to schedule a
legislative public hearing without Council voting for such. He asked why the Council was told in general
gas heaters would not be used before Council voted on December 15, 2020? What is the City Council's
policy when it passes laws under a false understanding? City of Edmonds government has argued it has a
duty to remove obstructions in the public ways and liability of the City fails to do so. The City argued this
for a strip of unimproved City property right-of-way that was only 7%Z feet wide. The City was dedicated
that strip of right-of-way in 1890. The city never improved or used the strip of right-of-way for anything.
Despite this, in 2009, after 119 years of not using the 7'/2 feet, City officials argued that the City had a
duty to remove obstructions from this 7'/2 foot wide easement area. In doing so, City of Edmonds
government referenced a 1928 case Lund v. City of Seattle. In the Lund v. City of Seattle case, Seattle
was required to answer in damages to one who had stumbled over a wire fence which the city had
permitted to be constructed and remain in the street. The case was decided on the theory that the city was
guilty of negligence in the maintenance of the street.
Mr. Reidy continued, have any Councilmembers asked what the City's duties were related to the
maintenance of the streateries located within the cty's streets? What liability exposure does the city have
if the city is negligent in the maintenance of our streets? Edmonds also has its own law, Chapter 9.25
Street Obstruction; among other things, Chapter 9.25 discusses the visibility of the motoring or pedestrian
public as such persons approach a street intersection. Ordinance 4209 declares it is an interim zoning
ordinance and Edmonds City Council chose not to amend Ordinance 4209. Despite both facts, the public
hearing required within 60 days was ever held. State law required such by February 13, 2021. Why does
this type of thing happen? Is there ever any accountability? Mayor Nelson stated publicly that he would
hate to see the downtown businesses suffer and the public be less well served because the streateries are
taken away. Nobody is taking anything away; all have known for a very long time that highly flawed
Ordinance 4209 sunsets on December 31, 2021. He urged the Council not to take away what many have
patiently waited for, do not take away the sunsetting of Ordinance 4209 on December 31 st
Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, acknowledged there were things that could be done to improve streateries
such as making them more beautiful as seen in other cities. She pointed out two nights ago every designer
store in Union Square in San Francisco was destroyed. She is 5 feet tall so when she drives down the
street, it is all she can do to see over her right fender to see how close she is to the streateries. The
streateries take away all the merchants' window dressing that draws people to the stores. She and others
feel that parking is needed. One of the ways to fix that is to remove the streateries and other things
obstructing parking spaces so that people who live east of 9t' can park downtown. To those who say she
can ride the bus, she has never needed to ride the bus and did not intend to start now. The other solution to
parking is to build a parking garage.
Daniel Murphy said he was strongly in support of the streateries, believing they were one of the best
things the City of Edmonds has done. A year ago the City banded together to create this program amid a
lot of uncertainty and tough times and the downtown has flourished, largely thanks to the streateries.
Other cities have seen boarded up shops, closed restaurants. The father of two, he takes his kids to the
streateries in Edmonds at least once a week. His kids are below the vaccination age so the streateries are a
safe environment for his family to enjoy the outdoors and enjoy being in the community during what has
been a really rough year. He wished the community could band together more, expressing concern with
some of the incivility of some of the callers, finding it embarrassing. He wanted to hear from the silent
majority who speak up for civility, community and togetherness which is what the streateries are all
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 24
Packet Pg. 39
about. He supported continuing the streateries at least through the winter and continuing to give small
business owners and restaurateurs a helping hand. Now is not the time to take our foot off the gas; there is
a new variant and the public needs to be vigilant, vigilant for their health as well as the downtown
economy that has experienced a lot of great growth when others have fallen by the wayside. He thanked
the Council for listening, and for putting up with some of the callers and holding their tongues.
Kara Heck, Edmonds, said she and her husband were in total support of the streateries. They enjoy the
streateries and even before COVID, they never parked outside the store where they planned to shop.
People may have to walk 1-2 blocks like they did in the past and continue to do now. To those that say the
streateries are not being used, she said Mar Ket and Rusty Pelican's streateries are well used. During
Walkable Main Street, she stopped people to ask what they thought including elderly women using
walkers who said it was great and doable. She acknowledged some parking was given up, but it was
viable and doable. This past weekend she visited C'est LA Vie, the kitchen shop, and Bountiful Home
and although she did not get a parking space right outside, similar to San Francisco, she was able to find
parking close enough to easily walk from place to place. She fully supported the streateries, felt they were
being used and hoped they would continue.
Greg Brewer, Edmonds, said it was time for the streateries to go. They were design and constructed as
temporary structures to help restaurants during indoor dining restrictions. To that end they were a success;
now that time is over, the Governor has allowed indoor dining at 100% and many people are choosing to
dine inside. If people want to dine outdoors, there are plenty of restaurants in the downtown area with
existing outdoor dining which those restaurants pay for. They are being discriminated against since the
restaurants with the streateries get the use of public sidewalks and streets for a nominal permit fee,
basically free. All restaurants outside the bowl are also being discriminated against since they do not get
this privilege at all. This discrimination has to end; the restaurants' hardship is over. Besides free use of
public property over the last I1/2 years, restaurants have also received hundreds of thousands of dollars in
PPP and numerous grants from city, county and state agencies. With all this money, they not only
survived, but they have also thrived including several that have opened new restaurants. He applauded
their success, however, it proves they are no longer struggling and in need of public property to survive.
Now is time for the restaurants to humbly and graciously remove the structures, thank the City and the
townspeople for allowing them to use our property and let them sunset at the end of the year as scheduled.
If Council votes to extend again, they will be doubling down on those unfair and discriminatory policies.
He urged the Council to do the right thing, end the streateries and allow the public to have their sidewalks
and streets back.
Liz Morgan, Edmonds, explained she and her husband Casey opened FIELD, a flower shop and gift
shop on Main Street located between Taki Tiki and Fire & the Feast. She thanked the Mayor, his staff and
Council for leading the community through the past 18 months. Keeping people at the forefront of their
focus, they have shown courage, been flexible and creative when making tough decisions, knowing this
has been a very divisive and politicized time when it really shouldn't have been. She expressed her
appreciation to the Edmonds Downtown Alliance, Chamber and other small businesses and restaurants for
all their hard work to make the downtown district such an incredible place to do business, to live, shop
and dine. She thanked Shubert and Andrew from Feed Me Hospitality for designing many of the current
structures which allowed the town to remain vibrant during a very dark and uncertain time. They also
donated lunches and made affordable lunches for local children. As a shop owner on Main Street, she has
had a front row seat to the streateries and chats with numerous customers daily, both local and from
outside Edmonds, the peninsula, eastside, Seattle and even out of state, and many have complimented
Edmonds on how vibrant the town is and how lovely it is to be able to have the option to sit outside while
dining. Many with young children have noted they came specifically to Edmonds to eat outdoors where
they feel safe.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 25
Packet Pg. 40
8.2.a
Ms. Morgan continued, one of her biggest joys this last year has been to open the windows and doors of
the shop and listen to the hustle and bustle and enjoyment that people are having in the town; it has been
amazing to witness the clinking of glasses, laughter, music and life. She suggested creating a committee
to look the matter holistically. She liked the idea of having a year-round or seasonal streateries program
and possibly charging restaurants for the space or designing structures that are tasteful and keeping with
the village feel of downtown Edmonds. Before any long term decisions are made to remove the structures,
she suggested conducting an objective analysis, not a survey that very clearly leads in one direction, not a
video done by a private citizen and not sales tax records that show an increase in merchant sales which
does not take into account the increased costs of doing business so sales numbers have likely increased as
well. There need to be facts, not sound bites and coming together to make decisions, not shaming
merchants who have expressed concern or suggested that restaurateurs are greedy and self-serving. These
are our neighbors and we need to start acting like it.
Mackey Guenther, Edmonds, expressed his support for downtown streateries which have added a really
special new dimension to the urban character of Edmonds and he would love to see further thought given
to their permanent presence in the City. The current streateries are obviously artifacts of innovation and
collaboration from the early days of COVID and to some extent they show that. There are definitely
legitimate concerns being raised about some elements of their current design like carbon emissions of
propane heating versus possibly electric and he would love to see a regulatory environment that
encourages continued iteration of this model. This first attempt at outdoor dining is a really incredible
first step towards creating Edmonds streets that serve human being and the lives they can live in them
which is environmentally, economically and socially aligned with a future for Edmonds that maximizes
the quality of life for all. The time he has spent around town in the streatery area has been enriched by the
visible social dining that is a near constant presence in these new spaces. They provide an opportunity for
people from anywhere to contribute to the remarkable atmosphere of the most cherished public spaces,
not just as passive consumer or customers but as active participants in creating the charm and ambiance
that Edmonds is known for.
Mr. Guenther continued, families are creating core memories in streateries, visitors are getting a first taste
of the charm of Edmonds in streateries, and people are probably falling in love in streateries. He was
proud to hear about the streateries ordinance when it was first announced; COVID has drawn attention to
the ways the build environment can either facilitate or constrain natural human organization and the
rethinking of street space is a super necessary lesson from this COVID experience that should be allowed
to continue to shape policy. He echoed previous speakers, pointing out cars are the safety issue
downtown, not streateries. He agreed the way streets are presently organized poses injury to pedestrian
but that injury existed before streateries and will exist after. He anticipated the worst thing that could
happen to someone in a streatery was heartburn. As climate change forces people to rethink fundamental
important patterns of lives, the streatery model is a first step toward the streets being a place for people
rather than cars.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO EXTEND TO 10:30. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess.
Council President Paine said there have been close to 90 emails over the past 1-2 2 weeks. As one of the
concerns is regarding parking, she encouraged the Administration to consider leasing parking from
downtown parking lots for the term of the streateries or longer. Adding more parking downtown is a
sensible solution that should be considered and discussed to determine if that is a possibility. It is also
important to determine the fees for streateries or any use of the public right-of-way if this will be done in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 26
Packet Pg. 41
8.2.a
a programmatic way. It is not unreasonable or unfair to charge a reasonable fee because there is a loss of
use by the space being used as a streatery. If consideration is given to permit fees or other associated
costs, it should be defensive and within range. She assured she will be reading all the emails and looked
forward to the Council's discussion next week.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested in addition to looking at the downtown core, also looking at
other areas of Edmonds such as along 9t1i Avenue where people claim parking spaces on City property. If
it done for the businesses, it should be done across the board and one should not be prioritized over the
other as she anticipated this was an issue occurring across the City.
As a former Council President, Councilmember Buckshnis recommended holding a meeting on December
21s' because the Council has a lot to discuss. She agreed with Council President Paine's comments, but
supported having the fees be a lot of money. She also suggested establishing criteria such as requiring
restaurants to be open 5 days a week, 8-5. She looked at the PowerPoint and wished it could have been
provided earlier but it still did not provide a good financial analysis of the amounts restaurateurs and
retailers have lost. She agreed the current method was discriminatory and the Council should have had a
public hearing in February. She supported looking at this pragmatically because it impacts a lot of people.
She supported having the Administration come back with hard numbers and look at things like ADA. She
recalled former Development Services Director Shane Hope saying there would not be propane and the
streateries would have a false floor so they would ADA compliant which is not the case in all the
streateries and some have a step down. She was aware the pandemic is continuing, but she wanted more
financial information because some of the businesses are suffering.
Councilmember Chen noted the Council has heard a lot of reasonable comments tonight. He
wholeheartedly agreed with Council President Paine's approach of extending the streateries for a
reasonable timeframe. He proposed the Council initiate a task force to include business owners, retailers,
perhaps some residents and key people to look at long term solutions and in the meantime, extend the
streateries through the end of the first quarter with a reasonable fee. He reminded the Council and the
public that the pandemic has not impacted just downtown Edmonds, it has impacts elsewhere in the City
especially on Highway 99 where 14 business were burned and destroyed and need the Council's attention.
He loved the charm of downtown, but recognized there were other places in Edmonds that deserve
attention as well.
Councilmember K. Johnson did not think this was the time, after 10 p.m., to discuss solutions for the
streateries. It is not on the agenda for discussion, it was strictly a public hearing and any discussion
should occur at a future meeting. She did not appreciate the approach Council President Paine began with
or Councilmember Chen's idea about forming a task force. Streateries were designed to deal with
restaurants having very limited use of indoor space. The lifting of the Governor's mandate that allowed
restaurants to return to 100% capacity occurred at the end of June. For the past five months, there was
notice that the streateries would end at the end of December. She did not support extending the streateries
and would vigorously oppose an extension. She objected to the discussion tonight because it is not on the
agenda and there are many other items on the agenda. She suggested continuing the discussion next week
after there had been time to digest the comments from the public hearing.
Councilmember Olson requested Council President Paine consider putting together a subcommittee of
Councilmembers to deal with some of the things that have been raised and bring it back to the Council in
the future.
Councilmember L. Johnson said the streatery program was set up as a temporary program in response to
pandemic necessitated closures. Everyone thought that would pass in a year but it didn't. The closures and
capacity reductions have disproportionately impacted restaurants and even with restrictions lifted, many
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 27
Packet Pg. 42
people prefer to eat outdoors where transmission risk is reduced. The program has been successful; it was
put in place to protect public and economic health. It is not perfect and there is room for improvement,
but it is a fallacy to treat this as an either/or argument. As the former Mayor liked to say, we're not
Deadmonds anymore. When restaurants succeed, the City as a whole benefits. Because of the increased
vibrancy, people can no longer expect to park right in front of their destination and may have to walk a
few blocks just as happens in other vibrant cities. ADA requirements and enforcement haven't changed
and streateries have not reduced ADA parking. There may be steps that can be taken to increase access
and that should be considered, however, an accessible downtown also means access for families with
children too young to be vaccinated and for those who are immunocompromised.
With regard to propane heaters, Councilmember L. Johnson said the concern should extend to all propane
heaters. Where is the concern with restaurants with outdoor space that have always used propane heaters?
If the intent is to address it, it needed to be addressed citywide. Aesthetics are subjective; some people
love the streateries, some don't and some are indifferent. Streateries were employed to save businesses
and the design was put together to be both functional and affordable considering their temporary nature. If
this was a permanent project, there would be more stringent architectural design standards. The streateries
program is a temporary response to a public emergency and the impacts on restaurants which by their
nature means it is not feasible to wear masks. It is not an attempt to favor one business over another but
an emergency response to allow dining options when inside dining was restricted and provide safer dining
options for those who do not feel comfortable eating inside.
Councilmember L. Johnson found it interesting that some who oppose streateries are vocal supporters of
the 4' Avenue Cultural Corridor project, a $6-8 million capital project that will reshape the public right-
of-way and create an expanded public gathering space to be used for cultural events including street
closures. By focusing on art, this program will be more favorable to some than others. She supported
reimagining public spaces citywide and an equitable distribution of capital projects and dollars with the
focus on underserved, underinvested neighborhoods. The City has been able to weather a once -in -a -
lifetime pandemic with its economic health intact. She urged the community to work together to improve
the streatery program and not treat it as an either/or but as a yes/and such as what changes can be made
and looked into? Can we find more parking? Can we improve accessibility?
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said until she sees a reduction in the pandemic where new viruses are
not coming up, it is appropriate to maintain outdoor dining. A lot of people in the City do not want to be
close to others indoors while the pandemic is ongoing. There is now a new variant and she sent
information to the Council from the Health District about it. It would perhaps be irresponsible to remove
the streateries at this point. She agreed the streateries probably shouldn't be permanent and in the long run
if there is a fee for the streateries occupying parking spaces, it also needs to occur in other areas of
Edmonds. She agreed with Council President Paine about establishing a subgroup to look at the wide
spread, multiple issues.
Council President Paine said establishing a task force or subcommittee was not her idea. She suggested
the businesses form a subcommittee and available staff could provide guidance regarding applicable
regulations. That would be more organic and holistic than something Councilmembers would develop.
She pointed out the businesses' resiliency, creativity and cooperation with each other has been
remarkable.
Adding to Councilmember L. Johnson's comment, Student Representative Roberts said if parking
continues to be a concern downtown, he suggested the City explore putting together a guide on using
public transit to access the downtown area. There are three bus lines that access downtown, 131, 16 and
196, and they are very underutilized even on weekends. If this option were highlighted, he anticipated
some would take advantage of it.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 28
Packet Pg. 43
8.2.a
Mr. Doherty said they will return at next week's meeting with responses to questions raised tonight.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
2. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT
Community Services & Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty said the final draft of the ILA
in the packet is the same agreement between the City and Snohomish Health District that has been
approved for the past several years. He apologized that it was being done at the last minute, noting it fell
between the cracks of two departments and staff recently realized the agreement needed to be approved to
pay this year's money.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order. As Vice Chair of the Snohomish Health District,
the district has not asked for any per capita funding this year. Letters were sent to cities indicating no per
capita funds were needed this year as the district is in a good position.
Mr. Doherty said the City should not be approving an agreement in December of the year but it
unfortunately was overlooked. In speaking with Heather Thompson at the Health District this week, her
interpretation was the City was expected to pay for 2021, but the district was not asking for funds in 2022.
It was originally thought the agreement could cover two years, but it was revised to remove reference to
2022 because the district is not asking for funds for 2022. This ILA is catching up almost a year late so a
final check can be issued in 2021 because the district expected funds from the City in 2021.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed per capita funds were needed in 2021 but moving forward the
district is not requesting any funding from cities. She cautioned funds may be requested in future years.
Mr. Doherty said the ILA includes a payment for 2021 of $21,450 which is 50 cents per capita on the
City's population of 42,900 per OFM last April. It is the same format at the previous year, and has been
reviewed by legal. Council can either approve the agreement tonight or put it on next week's Consent
Agenda.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out the Health District provides Narcan as well as training in its
use to police departments and first responders. In the past that was only done for cities who provided per -
capita funding, but starting in 2022, it will be provided to all cities.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3. 2022 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
EXTEND TO11 PM. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty introduced Lobbyist Debora
Munguia. Ms. Munguia reviewed:
• 2021 Legislative Session Summary
o 105-day biennial budget
■ Edmonds specific: transferred $6.5 million from Waterfront Connector project to SR 99
project; proviso giving City first right of purchase of Unocal Marsh property from state,
and $258,000 to help with potential purchase.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 29
Packet Pg. 44
8.2.a
■ Major themes: COVID relief, economic recovery, climate action and advancing racial
equity
■ $59.2 billion in state revenue, $10.6 billion in federal stimulus funds
■ Unprecedented investments in Housing Trust Fund, child care, public health, schools,
foreclosure prevention/rental assistance
■ Historic legislation on climate, clean fuels, police accountability, capital gains
o 2022 Session begins January 10, a short 60-day supplemental budget
■ Clarifications to major legislation passed last session (e.g., law enforcement, long term
care act)
■ Additional federal revenue appropriations
■ Transportation package/transfers?
Mr. Doherty reviewed:
• Highlights from Proposed 2022 Legislative Agenda
o Transportation Request
■ Secure $22.5 million in the state's future transportation package for the next phase of the
SR 99 Revitalization Project.
■ In the 2021 Legislative Session, both the House and Senate proposed separate "New Law
Spending Plans" for transportation projects that would be funded by new revenues. The
Senate "Forward Washington" proposal includes $22.5 million for the SR 99
Revitalization Project. The House "Miles Ahead" did not include funding for the SR 99
project. The Legislature has not yet passed a new revenue package. The City needs both
the House and Senate to include the $22.5 million for the next phase of this project as
they work toward agreement on a future transportation package
o Priorities
■ Edmonds Marsh
- No new request for 2022 Session.
- The Legislature in the 2021 Session approved a proviso for the duration of the 2021-
2023 biennium that would provide Edmonds first right of purchase of the former
UNOCAL site when it transfers to WSDOT. In addition, the Legislature earmarked
$258,000 to help fund that potential purchase. Since these provisions are in effect
until 6/30/23, the City will re -assess any further needs for support or assistance from
the Legislature in the 2023 Session.
■ Parks, Recreation and Conservation
- Support the WRPA legislative priorities
■ Invest in Housing Stability and Affordability
■ Law Enforcement Laws
- Support efforts to provide clarifying amendments to law enforcement -related
legislation passed in the 2021 Session, particularly related to probable cause vs.
reasonable suspicion, domestic violence standards, and other issues that may be
considered in the Session
■ Puget Sound Health and Salmon/Orca Recovery
- Support the WRIA8 legislative priorities
■ Local and State Public Health Funding and Programming
- Support Snohomish Health District legislative priorities
■ Land Use Issues (GMA, SEPA, etc.)
- Affordable housing
- Salmon/orca recovery
- Longer Comp Plan update cycles
- Participate in GMA-reform discussions
- Monitor/participate in regulatory -reform discussions
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 30
Packet Pg. 45
8.2.a
■ Environmental and Climate -Related Issues
■ Fiscal Impacts of Legislation/Rulemaking
■ Fiscal Sustainability for Local Governments
Ranked -Choice Voting Issue
o The Diversity Commission forwarded a memo to Mayor and Council, expressing a proposal
to Council to include support for SHB 1156 from the 2021 Legislative Session in the
upcoming Session.
o SHB 1156 would allow for ranked -choice voting in local jurisdictions at their option. It is
permissive, not obligatory.
o Council may consider including this issue in the final, approved 2022 Legislative Agenda.
Next Steps
o Approve 2022 legislative agenda
o Include any potential amendments from Council
Councilmember Olson referred to the land use issues, commenting it was framed negatively in terms of
going outside the urban growth areas. Lake Stevens for example, feels the need to grow in one direction
of their community which provides opportunity to take density that other cities would otherwise be
responsible for under the GMA. She wanted to be thoughtful about that especially until stormwater issues
are addressed as well as efforts to protect pocket forests. Not being completely rigid on allowing many of
the GMA lines to move helps Edmonds protect its green spaces.
Council President Paine expressed support for public defense costs which will be increasing due to recent
legislative changes. If the State provides funding for courts, she wanted to ensure courts benefited from
the changes in State law that were approved last session and will be corrected this session. Municipal
courts will be hit heavily; Edmonds Municipal Court benefitted from a grant they received in the last 6-8
months and it would be nice if grant opportunities were available for other efforts.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported she met with Senator Cantwell's office and others at the federal and
state level regarding the Puget Sound Salmon Partnership Salmon Recovery Council; $1 billion has been
set aside for infrastructure and culverts. In addition to what Councilmember Olson said, Edmonds has
some major watershed issues. She and Councilmember Chen looked at the culverts in the Perrinville area,
the marsh and SR 104. Correcting fish passage barriers is important but there are also watershed issues
further up that are not related to culverts or fish passage. She was unsure how that could be included in
the legislative agenda but wanted the City to continue looking for funds for that effort. Mr. Doherty
suggested including reference to tracking the availability of state and federal funds for culverts and other
stormwater related projects. Councilmember Buckshnis anticipated funds will be available via the
infrastructure bill.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed support for continuing to receive funding for law enforcement
adjustments that have been made statewide. Those will cost money and she was hopeful funds would be
provided from the governor's office. She also supported continuing to support funding for public health.
The Health District has been solvent this year because they did not have to beg/barter for money from the
state but she could not guarantee the district would be solvent in future years. She did not want to pit the
environment against people; it is important to continue to fund services for those is need such as the
homeless, mentally ill, veterans, disabled and seniors. With regard to GMA, she pointed out Edmonds has
always met its GMA goals by doing nothing. She was hopeful development along Highway 99 would
improve the City's GMA numbers in the future.
Councilmember L. Johnson referred to Gun Violence Reduction, commenting as someone deeply
involved in the issue, she suggested the use of the term Gun Violence Prevention, a term that is used in
advocacy work. She also suggested some stronger and expanded wording related to gun violence as a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 31
Packet Pg. 46
8.2.a
public health crisis. She also suggested expanding the wording to include support for the impact that gun
violence has had on mental health and on certain communities. She offered to work with Mr. Doherty on
the wording.
It was agreed the amended Legislative Agenda would be on next week's Consent Agenda.
4. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HB 1156, RANKED CHOICE VOTING
Councilmember Olson explained the resolution supports HB 1156 which allows municipalities to choose
the option of ranked choice voting. She recalled the benefits of that approach were described during
Audience Comments. As one of the commenters said, it would be appropriate to form a citizen task force,
an agenda item she submitted in May, to look at different voting options and decide what would be best
for the community and have the task force present their recommendation the City Council. The resolution
supports legislation at the state level to make this an option for all municipalities. She recognized Student
Representative Roberts for his involvement and creation of the resolution that was emailed to Council.
Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated the comment about forming a task force to review options and
weigh what work for Edmonds. She understood the benefits and supported ranked choice voting,
including HB 1156. As someone who has knocked on hundreds of doors and talked with many citizens,
she knew there was strong support for district elections so she was concerned about proceeding with the
resolution. There appear to be two options, including ranked choice voting as part of the legislative
agenda, but passing a resolution seems to place a priority on ranked choice voting over district elections
before a task force considers what is best for Edmonds. She was interested in knowing which approach,
ranked choice voting or district elections, was best for and desired by most Edmonds residents and which
will best address underrepresentation and whether both can be enacted or were they mutually exclusive.
Councilmember Olson said they are not mutually exclusive; they can be used in combination. Most
important, the resolution as written by no means says Edmonds will be doing ranked choice voting. The
resolution states Edmonds supports the option of having this available to all local municipalities.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked Mr. Doherty if he had any inkling whether the House will consider this
in their 60 day session. Mr. Doherty answered anything that was not officially voted down, died for lack
of action, is brought back at the beginning of the following session. This is a supplemental session in the
sense that it cleans up what wasn't passed or capital issues. It will be alive at least for a short while and
legislators in both houses can address it.
Councilmember Chen clarified by adopting the resolution, the Council was only supporting HB 1156
which does not exclude the other possibilities. He supported the resolution.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas wanted to ensure the resolution would not affect districting. Mr. Doherty
answered there has not been an official discussion about district voting although there may be coming up.
Whether there is at -large voting or district voting, the notion of ranked choice is the way voters vote for
people whether it is the entire area or a subarea. They can work together and are not mutually exclusive.
Council President Paine expressed support for ranked choice voting, recognizing if there had been a small
change in the votes in one of the races in the last election, four of the City's Councilmembers would have
lived within 1/4 mile of each other. Districting is a very real issue and if a task force if formed, that is
something they should also consider.
Student Representative Roberts said when lobbying for HB 1156, it would be unusual for Fair Vote to say
that Bellingham, Olympia and other cities have passed resolutions in favor of ranked choice voting in
addition to Edmonds having it on its legislative agenda. Putting HB 1156 on the legislative agenda would
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 32
Packet Pg. 47
8.2.a
not have the same lobbying effect as a resolution from Fair Vote's perspective. The purpose of the
resolution is not to put ranked choice voting above other priorities but explicitly state the Council's
support for allowing jurisdictions to have the option to adopt it.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
PASS THE RESOLUTION.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she does not support ranked choice voting for the City of Edmonds.
Edmonds often only has two candidates and sometimes only one candidate although in the last election
there were four candidates. She did not believe ranked choice voting would be significant when looking at
the historical experience in Edmonds. Perhaps it would be appropriate in Seattle where numerous people
running for mayor or council. Ranked choice voting is a very old idea, going back to the 17t' century.
Washington State's format is the top two and that is what she supports. As a student of political science,
ranked choice voting was the topic of the day, flavor of the month and there needs to be a more vigorous
evaluation to ensure this is something that the citizens of Edmonds support. For those reasons she did not
support the resolution.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she did not want to vote against a resolution for ranked choice voting,
but preferred to delay the vote until next week and in the meantime, get an expert or a more definitive
answer whether this complicates moving forward with district elections if that is the task force's
recommendation. She would like to support what the state is doing, but approving a resolution for only
ranked choice voting seems like due consideration is not being given to district elections. Before voting to
approve the resolution, she wanted to have that question answered as well as what complications would
supporting both present.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO POSTPONE THIS FOR A WEEK.
Councilmember Olson said she always wants Councilmembers to have the time they need for preparation
on a vote. However, the resolution expressly states the City supports this as an option and districting and
ranked choice voting are not mutually exclusive. Learning more about ranked choice voting would not
change anything in a week because the resolution only supports allowing it as a local option. In light of
that, she asked if Councilmember Buckshnis wanted to withdraw the motion or was an extra week
desirable.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Chen raised a point of clarification, asking if the original motion needed to be
withdrawn. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said technically Councilmember Buckshnis' motion was not an
amendment, it was a subsidiary motion to postpone to a certain time which ranks higher than a motion to
amend. Therefore, the main motion is still pending, but any consideration of it has been postponed to next
week's Council meeting. No additional action needed to be taken tonight.
4. COMPLAINT AGAINST COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUSAN PAINE FOR CITY OF
EDMONDS CODE OF ETHICS VIOLATION
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 15 MINUTES TO 11:15 P.M.
Council President Paine commented that would not leave much time for Council or Mayor comments.
Councilmember Chen requested this be moved to executive session instead of public.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 33
Packet Pg. 48
8.2.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the accused has the ability to move it to executive session or public
session. That cannot be decided by the Council. City Attorney Taraday agreed, explaining executive
sessions exist to protect the rights of the subject of the complaint and the OPMA states...
Councilmember Olson raised a point of order, recommending the Council vote on the motion to extend.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Taraday relayed language in the statute strongly suggests if the subject of the complaint does not
want it to be in executive session, the discussion will not be in executive session. The executive session
that could potentially apply was subsection 1(f) of 42.30.110 which allows executive sessions to receive
and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or employee. However, upon the
request of such officer or employee, a public hearing or a meeting open to the public shall be conducted
upon such complaint or charge. Although he had not expressly heard Council President Paine say this, it
was his understanding following a discussion earlier today that she prefers the discussion occur in public,
but it is ultimately up to the subject of complaint, in this instance, Council President Paine, so it is her call
whether the discussion occurs in executive session.
Council President Paine said she was the one who put this item on agenda as part of the open meeting.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised this was added to the agenda today at approximately 3 p.m., a
complaint against Council President Susan Paine for a City of Edmonds Code of Ethics violation. She and
Councilmember K. Johnson prepared the complaint. She read the following into the record:
"Backjzround/History
Historically, the Edmonds City Council has finalized the budget between December 5th and December
16th. There is a legal mandate to finalize by year end.
This complaint is against Council President Susan Paine for violating the first standard of the Code of
Ethics while scheduling and managing the 2022 budget process.
The very first standard is:
"Be dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government."
Council President Paine summed up her reasoning to move up the 2022 budget process in the 11/23/21
minutes as follows: "...Councilmember Distelhorst has been involved in projects with a level of diligence
and appreciation for the finetuned needs that the budget deserves. Councilmember Chen is certainly a
very bright man and there is no doubt he would be a strong performer for the Council, but moving the
timeline a bit was the right thing to do because the right people were in place and understood the
projects." This statement implies that newly elected Mr. Chen had not followed Council meetings and that
his experience as a CPA, former internal and external auditor and as a minority would have no added
value. She also implied that two veteran Councilmembers were not needed to be part of the final vote.
Recommendation
Request that the attorney to prepare a resolution sanction Council President Susan Paine for this Ethics
violation.
Narrative
1) The Council President scheduled a budget hearing during the time of the Council's code -required
monthly Finance Committee meeting. Section 1.04.040 "Cancellation of regularly scheduled
meeting" allows the Council President to cancel a meeting for certain reasons. There was no public
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 34
Packet Pg. 49
8.2.a
notification or reasons given as required by code. More importantly, no content for that code -required
meeting such as the September quarterly was put into the system.
2) The Council President introduced a "new public hearing rule" on the night of the continuance. This
"rule" denied any citizen the ability to comment a second time even if it was on a different aspect of
the budget. This "rule" did not honor the fact that official minutes from three budget meetings were
newly available to the public. As a result, citizens expecting to weigh in on the new material were
then denied.
3) It is apparent that the Council President put more weight on the vote of an appointed Councilmember
rather than two elected veteran Councilmembers. She suggested and scheduled a no -notice
adjournment of the budget deliberation to the next day in spite of three Councilmembers having
conflicts. Two Councilmembers were unable to attend and still had unvetted budget amendments and
questions.
4) The Council President should not decide who is part of the budget process: that decision sits with the
electorate. By moving the final budget vote from 11/23/21 to 11/16/21, the legislative participants
changed from the incoming elected Councilmember to the outgoing appointed Councilmember.
The parts that the other members of the simple majority played during this budgetary process may not rise
to a level of a sanction; but the Council President was only able to perform these acts because of the overt
support and votes from all three. The voices of the public were denied and changing the extended agenda
and the adjourned meeting were not the will of the electorate. This record should reflect that
Councilmembers Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Laura Johnson and former Councilmember Luke Distelhorst
were complicit in this process."
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON, TO HAVE THE ATTORNEY PREPARE A RESOLUTION SANCTIONING
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE FOR THIS ETHICS VIOLATION.
Council President Paine said there is a lot of argument in this complaint against her that isn't valid in so
many ways. It is personalized to so many things that are absolutely incorrect. It is unfortunate it uses the
newest Councilmember, Will Chen, to bolster the argument before he even joined the Council which she
felt was terribly uncalled for. Bringing this charge against her is reaching a new level of absurdity that is
entirely divisive and extraordinary partisan. It is absurd because there has been a greater level of
community communication and Council participation during the entire budget process. There have been
more people talking about the budget and the budget process than ever before. Being on Zoom reaches
parts of the community that have never been reached before. She disagreed with the statement that this
violates effective and democratic government, stating this is democratic government, it is absolutely
reaching the people who look to the Council to make decisions on their behalf. As citizens stated tonight,
they enjoy Edmonds, their neighborhoods and their parks; there are things that need to be worked on and
the budget addressed all those things. Having other public hearing extended the ability to have
discussions. The results prove the process has been effective because there has been greater participation,
something the Council has always wanted. More people attend Edmonds City Council meeting than most
other cities, involvement that is very important.
Council President Paine continued, earlier this year at the Council retreat, the Council asked the
Administration for more concise, higher level budget presentations and to avoid repetitive presentations.
She recalled the Administration was surprised by that, including Mr. Turley who said that was different
than was done in the past. The Council has discussed the budget process across the year and the budget
retreat was an opportunity for the Council to come together to discuss the budget. The Administration
honored that request and a timeline with an effective process was put in place. Questions submitted by the
community and Councilmembers were answered and posted on the City's website. The absurdity of this
charge goes even further; it is inappropriate to sanction a Councilmember if either of the two
Councilmembers do not like how she voted. If they were unhappy with the budget discussion and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 35
Packet Pg. 50
8.2.a
decision, either should have been able to find a way to attend all the budget meetings, particularly since
both had spent a great deal of time asking questions, to attend and be part of the process.
Council President Paine continued, referencing claim number 1, the Finance Committee meeting was
canceled because the only item that needed to be discussed was the budget. With no other agenda items,
she canceled the meeting. If she didn't follow the right steps, she commented this has been a year for not
following steps as has been seen across the board on Council. The allegation that there was a new public
hearing rule, she said continuing a public hearing is kind of like the old public hearing sign-up sheet,
people don't get to put their name on it a dozen times. People who had a chance to speak also had a
chance to speak after the fact and coming back in doesn't mean they get to run around to the end of the
line and sign up again. She found that allegation unfair and avoidance of what actually has been going on
across all the years, the application of a common rule. If the reference was to the continuance of the
hearing and adjournment to the next day, that offered more time on the 17' for the Council to get through
its agenda.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO EXTEND FOR 10 MINUTES TO 11:25. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Council President Paine explained the adjournment to the next day provided another three hours to
complete the budget proceedings which was appropriate. The law allowing that has been incorporated
into the local code and it is not uncommon if the Council cannot get through its agenda to take it up the
next time they meet. The City's code is pretty specific and she followed the code. The Council heard a lot
from the community over the last 4-5 weeks as well as a lot of comments/questions internally from
everyone. She was amazed at the performance, diligence and questions that came in on the timeline
requested which should not go unrecognized. With regard to claim #3, there are 7 Councilmembers and
there is no Councilmember in waiting. Most of the time the seating of Councilmembers does not happen
like this, but when it became clear to her that there would be a transfer of power on the same day the
Council was supposed to pass the budget, the timeline shifted a bit but that did not mean it was
undemocratic.
Council President Paine continued, all seven Councilmembers have the same authority and ability to
render a decision regarding the budget. She denied the claim that this was out of order and asked that it be
reconsidered because it looks a little silly to her. When Councilmembers talk about whether she has the
ability to make a decision about who is participating, there are only seven Councilmembers at the same
time. It is a little irrational for the argument to go into a circular logic with regard to veteran
Councilmembers when all Councilmember are equal and all have the same obligations, authority and
commitment to the community; there is no extra authority for being on the Council longer. She never
doubted any Councilmember's commitment to the community.
Council President Paine continued, Councilmembers calling themselves veteran Councilmembers turns
the argument upside down, saying Councilmember Distelhorst was less able to make a decision on the
budget than the incoming Councilmember for Position 2 on that very day. She found that an irrational
argument that did not make sense. She was surprised by this, felt it needed to be discussed in the public,
but was not what the public expects of the Council. She reiterated it was divisive, partisan in many ways;
the process did not reduce the effectiveness, the process and it was not anti -democratic. She repeated the
process was not anti -democratic; there have been more comments on the budget this year than in previous
years.
To the comment that the budget is normally finalized between December 5' and 15t'', Council President
Paine said every now and again the Council has passed the budget at the end of December, but that is
most likely due to incorporating the CFP/CIP into budget which has to be done at the end of the year.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 36
Packet Pg. 51
8.2.a
The luxury of extending the budget for 8-12 weeks was an artifact of something that probably has nothing
to do with the actual budget.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out Luke Distelhorst spent two years on the Council. He served
on the budget committee, he understood what every department does and how they do it. Nothing toward
Councilmember Chen, he is a very nice person, but anybody who does not know that the City spends a
majority of its funding on public safety needs more time in the chute. She recalled Councilmembers
Buckshnis and K. Johnson complaining because the four new Councilmembers were given too much
responsibility and questioning whether they could handle it. The allegations talk about bringing in a new
person who does not even quite understand the budget into a process to control the budget which she
found absolutely foolish. She agreed this was divisive and partisan in its approach.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she found it appalling that Councilmember Buckshnis missed four
meetings between October and November. She knew the budget was coming and chose to go on vacation
and not call into Council meetings. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she has been out of town on the
other side of the country during this period and called into meetings. She found it appalling that someone
would try to control the budget based on their personal vacation. She said the same was true with
Councilmember K. Johnson who could not attend the adjourned Council meeting, considering that she
was in a facility where she could have responded. She said the Council was spinning its wheels, focusing
on Council President Paine.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, requesting Mayor Nelson advise Councilmember
Fraley-Monillas not to make personal attacks against her about facts upon which she has no true
knowledge.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said her point was Councilmember K. Johnson could not attend the
meeting. She had to guess the reason why because Councilmember K. Johnson did not tell anyone why
she was unable to attend the next day's meeting. She understood why Councilmember Buckshnis couldn't
attend, she was out of town and made that decision. The Council meets at the same time every year to
consider the budget. Councilmember Buckshnis chose not to attend four meetings in the last 1 %2 months,
not because she was ill, in a facility, in the hospital or something, but because she had other things to do.
The Council cannot delay working on the budget because one Councilmember has things they want to do;
the Council has to move forward with the budget. Many cities have completed their budgets already and
many are done meeting for the year.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas continued, Councilmember Buckshnis is not a CPA and not an
accountant and she depends on Finance Director Dave Turley for information. She could not understand
that these silly charges were about. She promised next week there would be more and they would be
against the one that think they're harmless, but they are absolutely not.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO EXTEND 10 MINUTES TO 11:35. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember L. Johnson said historically Edmonds has allowed the budget process to go late in the
year, close to the mandated cutoff and often with a rush of last minute amendments for which there was
no opportunity to vet and the rush of unvetted amendments lacked transparency. Just because something
has always been done one way is not necessarily a reason to continue. In this case, following best
practices put forward by the finance director, the Council started the process earlier and when it was
noticed that the November 23 scheduled vote was just hours after a new Councilmember would assume
office, the schedule was moved up by a week to November 16", allowing budget deliberations and a vote
with the same Council. It wouldn't be fair to ask a Councilmember who had just assumed office to vote
on something as important as the budget given that they had not participated in the lengthy presentation
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 37
Packet Pg. 52
8.2.a
and deliberation process. She was unsure how an argument could be made about that; participating in the
budget is more than reading the budget book, it is quite involved. If she was in that position, assuming
office hours before a vote was taken on the budget, she would have to abstain from the vote and they did
not want to put anyone in that position.
Councilmember L. Johnson continued, it is ironic that this sanction against a Council President acting
well within their responsibilities is being levied by a Councilmember who participated in organized
obstructionism of the budget process, has levied unsubstantiated accusations that the process was
improper and possibly illegal, has made numerous public accusations against staff, planned two vacations
during the budget season and failed to attend multiple meetings even though Zoom makes it possible to
attend while out of town. She concluded this is ridiculous.
Councilmember Chen said all Councilmembers and the Mayor are all dedicated public servants and do
what they can, sacrifice their own time including attending a meeting until nearly midnight tonight. He
has been following the budget process and was ready to vote so saying he was not ready to vote was
untrue. In his observation, moving the process up a week from the original schedule resulted in numerous
amendments that when Councilmember Olson moved the amendment, she could not get a second ,
resulting in many important budget decisions being pushed through and creating an opportunity in
January to make a number of amendments.
Councilmember Chen said he wanted the Council to treat each like colleagues, like friends, not poke
people in the back. Unfortunately, the Open Public Meetings Act prevents Councilmembers from getting
together for social events, but Councilmembers need to become good friends. He has heard that some
Councilmembers do not talk to each other or look at each other which he felt was unhealthy. He was not
happy the process was pushed up, that there was no opportunity for public comment on November 17''
and that Councilmember Olson was unable to get a second to the motions she made to amend the budget.
He agreed the process was rushed which provides an opportunity to make amendments when Neil Tibbott
joins the Council. In the interest of cohesiveness, he did not support the sanction and wanted the Council
to cool down a bit and treat each other like friends. He encouraged Councilmembers not to let their
political party push them to accomplish a certain agenda. He concluded, we all love Edmonds, we should
look out for Edmonds and not certain political parties.
Councilmember Olson pointed out there are six democrats and one unaffiliated person on the Council.
The talk about how partisan everything is always interesting, but it puts Councilmembers in an awkward
position when enforcing ethics against each other when needed which is something the Council absolutely
needs to address. She supported forming an external ethics board instead of Councilmembers. This was
undemocratic and she said it repeatedly before the schedule was permanent and the Council was locked
into it including telling Mr. Turley that it was wrong, that it was undemocratic. What Councilmember L.
Johnson said about the way the budget has been done in the past does not mean it's a best practice is a
true statement. The extended agenda stated the final budget deliberations would occur on November 23'
and December 7' if needed and those dates were noticed, but once the primarily election revealed the
seated Councilmember would not be part of the process, the dates were revised to change the participants
in the budget process. If a change was going to be made, it could have easily been changed to the same
window of time that has occurred over the last four years, December 5t' to 16t''. She knew
Councilmember Chen would have been prepared to participate the first day, but if Councilmembers were
concerned about that, the process could have been moved forward a few weeks to provide more time for
him to get his bearings.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, saying the Councilmember was straying from the
topic. Councilmember Olson said this absolutely was the issue. Mayor Nelson ruled point not taken.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 38
Packet Pg. 53
8.2.a
Councilmember Olson continued, the timeline was absolutely changed for the purpose of changing the
participants in the process, contrary to the will of the people and if that doesn't define undemocratic, she
did not know what did. She told Mr. Turley, Mayor Nelson, and Council President Paine in phone calls or
face-to-face meetings before the revised schedule was locked in that the change was undemocratic. She
said it was not about attacking a person or sanctioning a person, it was sanctioning the behavior; this is
not the way government should operate. With regard to collegiality, she desperately wanted that and
hoped it could be achieved in the new year. First it needs to be about doing business in a democratic way.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO
EXTEND UNTIL 11:50. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Council President Paine said she appreciated what Councilmember Chen said. It is true that the Council
needs to be more collegial; but there are rules in place that prevent that. She found it extraordinarily
unfortunate and wildly inappropriate that a complaint is being leveraged against any Councilmember. She
reiterated there has been a lot of wonderful public process that was not illegal. The community has been
well served; this is a familiar process that Councilmembers should be able to accomplish. It would have
been more fortunate if Councilmembers had attended the meeting to support Councilmember Olson's
requests when the Council diligently reviewed all the requests, but most motions died for lack of second
even for discussion. She concluded people should have been there.
Councilmember L. Johnson said extended agendas are planning tools subject to frequent change. Stating
it as through it was solidified was a false narrative. Additionally, just because someone does not like
something, does not make it undemocratic. She did not like the obstructionism that happened, but wasn't
sure she could call it undemocratic. She didn't like the use of that tool but was not accusing anyone of
being undemocratic or illegal; the process was followed. People are stating opinions as fact, there is no
fact that it was undemocratic. She objected to stating dates as fact using the extended agenda, when at the
top of the extended agenda is the statement, planning tool subject to frequent amendment. She concluded
this is silly, this is ridiculous, process was followed.
Councilmember K. Johnson said this is not silly; this is a very serious charge against the Council
President who manipulated the process, following the correct rules but clearly manipulating process by
rushing approval of the budget for her desired outcome, knowing have full well that she would have four
votes perhaps only if Councilmember Distelhorst was included. She pointed out this was not the Mayor's
budget, it is the Council's budget; however, what the four Councilmembers adopted is almost identical to
the Mayor's budget. There was never any serious discussion of the line items or budget items. Despite all
the flowery language that Council President Paine offered about the process, how democratic things were
and the amount of public input, the bottom line is she manipulated the process, it will not stand and they
are calling her on it.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said that is so ridiculous. What Councilmember K. Johnson is saying is
an excuse for not being at the meeting and what Councilmember Buckshnis is saying is an excuse for not
being at meetings. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she attended meetings from the other side of the
country. She felt what Councilmembers Buckshnis and K. Johnson were pushing regarding the Council
President was very inappropriate. Councilmembers Buckshnis and K. Johnson chose not to be present and
to not vote. In her history with the City, she was aware of other votes regarding budget that went into the
next day; this is not the first time it has happened. It is the first time it has happened when
Councilmembers had other plans where they chose to go on vacation to spend time with their family or
had medical issues they needed to deal with. She objected to their bringing up the Council President on
charges because of their inadequate ability to run the City, the biggest farce she has seen yet. She urged
them to stand behind the Council President for a change. She thanked Councilmember Chen for his
willingness to do that and for understanding that this is just a bunch of games that she found really
inappropriate. She promised she will be watching and talking and she has not been shut down.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 39
Packet Pg. 54
Councilmember Buckshnis said there has never been an adjournment meeting and she has never seen that
process. When City Clerk Scott Passey sent out the email, she did not read the fine print and the Council
President did not call or text her about the adjourned meeting, she had to ask Mr. Taraday about it.
Everything in the narrative is factual; the admission by the Council President that the right people were in
place for the right vote was clear. Although some refer to her absence, in looking at her work, she and
Councilmember K. Johnson raised the most issues with the budget that needed to be vetted. She agreed
she was not available to attend the meeting due to a long standing family commitment but that doesn't
matter, what matters is the agenda was changed by one week by the Council President. The Finance
Committee meeting was canceled with no publication; citizens were upset they were denied the ability to
make comments at the continued public hearing even though there were new minutes available for the
three budget meetings. The logic regarding that was incorrect; citizens had new material to comment on.
Councilmember Buckshnis continued, regarding item #3, it was obvious the Council President put more
weight on the appointed Councilmember. Councilmember Chen said he was prepared to vote on
November 23' and she was prepared to vote on November 23rd, yet she was denied that ability due to the
adjourned meeting. She said Councilmember Fraley-Monillas can make whatever speculations she wants,
recalling in 2014 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas called her and demanded that the Council wait a week
so she could vote on the budget.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, stating it was in appropriate for a
Councilmember to be shooting bullets at her. Mayor Nelson agreed there have been a lot of accusations.
Councilmember Buckshnis said everybody's shooting bullets. She stood by the sanction and will go on
record...
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised another point of order, alleging Councilmember Buckshnis was
not speaking to the motion. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was speaking to the motion.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked for the motion to be restated. Councilmember Buckshnis said the
motion was to sanction Council President Susan Paine. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas requested the
motion on the record be restated, not what Councilmember Buckshnis said.
Mr. Taraday restated the motion:
TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF CENSURE.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the date for drafting the resolution. Mr. Taraday said that was not
stated.
Councilmember Buckshnis said as always she is interrupted, but the fact of the matter is everything
written is factual. She did not want a Council President in the future to do something like this. She
acknowledged there had never been a Council appointee that did not make it through the primary which
contributed to this situation. She pointed out Councilmember Chen said he was prepared to vote on the
budget. She expressed support for sanctioning Council President Paine.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
EXTEND TO 12:10. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER
MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING
YES; COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 40
Packet Pg. 55
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
EXTEND TO MIDNIGHT. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS L. JOHNSON AND
FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
Council President Paine asserted the comments in this charging document were wildly out of line and the
narrative is very divisive. She hoped the Council would have a chance for a better new year. She found it
ironic that the Councilmembers were asking to sanction someone just because they did not like the
outcome of the vote. It was a democratic process and the ability for people to comment in abundance
doesn't mean there was any shortage of access to the public hearings.
Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the term "fact" that is being thrown around; Councilmember
Buckshnis just said everything is fact, but that is not true. She referred to comments in the narrative that
actions implied something were fact or that it was apparent the Council President put more weight on the
vote. That is not fact, it is subjective, someone's opinion. She urged the Council to stick to the facts and
be fair and honest. If it is someone's opinion, it should be stated as such. A fact stands on its own; the
narrative is full of opinion.
Councilmember Olson said the things that being said are bothersome to her as well; saying that the
Councilmembers did not like the outcome, it felt like the outcome was being fixed. Ignoring the choice
that the people made in the election felt undemocratic to her.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the Council is being looked at as a cast of fools by the whole county
because Councilmembers are being set up to chew on each other which she felt was ridiculous. She
emphasized this was a very small conservative minority that were pushing forward. She preferred to not
be looked at as a cast of fools. It is inappropriate to bring Council President Paine up on charges for what
she has done legally.
Councilmember Olson said a lot of things that are legal are not ethical. This was a code of ethic violation.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas repeated "the cast of fools." Mayor Nelson requested Councilmembers
wait until they were called upon to speak.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4); COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, FRALEY-MONILLAS
AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
���K�IIJ�[y 11[K� ►� ►�
Council President Paine expressed support for considering the proposed change in the land
acknowledgement next week to recognize all the Salish peoples. She thanked everyone who participated
in tonight's meeting, 26 during the public hearing and 17 during audience comments.
Councilmember Chen called to the public's attention that the county will vote on the 0.1% sales tax
increase on December 15t''. He thanked the 43 participants who were still listening at almost midnight.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked everyone for their robust participation tonight and encouraged them
to stay engaged and continue to participate. It was nice to hear new voices and to get representation from
a wider subset of the community.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas repeated she was dealing with a cast of fools who wanted to bring
someone up on charges for doing their job legally. She thanked Council President Paine for everything
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 41
Packet Pg. 56
8.2.a
she has done, relaying her opinion that she was moving forward in a way that was legal and helpful for all
Councilmembers. She can't wait to wait next year and was excited not to be constrained on what she says.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she was available for a meeting on December 21', commenting agenda
planning had not been done well this year. There is a full meeting agenda next week and she did not
support meetings going until midnight. She found it unfortunate that people worry about who the cast of
fools are, regardless of whether things were done legally, there were ethic issues which were what she and
Councilmember K. Johnson brought up. She was glad she had gone on record with her concerns and
appreciated Councilmember K. Johnson's assistance.
Student Representative Roberts urged the public to continue wearing masks, get booster shots and be kind
and respectful to each other. At the end of the day, we're all humans and we all deserve respect. We're all
Edmonds residents and want the best for the community in the short and long term.
10 MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson thanked everyone for providing probably the most robust commentary from a variety of
perspectives on the temporary objects [streateries] that bring out a lot of passion. He was happy to see that
level of engagement. He wished there were times he could just give everyone a hug because it seemed
like everyone needed a hug.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:59 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 42
Packet Pg. 57
8.2.a
Public Comment for 12/7/21 Council Meeting:
From: Joan Bloom
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 4:05 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries public hearing, END Streateries
Council and Mayor Nelson,
Having just reviewed every LTE and comment on myedmondsnews regarding the Streateries, I
feel strongly that the Streateries should sunset on December 31, 2021 for the following reasons:
• They were not legally initiated. (See ALL of Ken Reidy's emails)
• They are unsafe as they do not meet fire and safety codes.
• They contribute to climate change with use of multiple gas heaters.
https://myed mondsnews.com/2021 /12/letter-to-the-editor-ed monds-streateries-
some-basic-math/
• They favor some restaurants over other restaurants and businesses, and thus are
unfair and inequitable to ALL business owners.
• They are no longer necessary to provide adequate outdoor dining options for
those who choose to eat outside. Many of the restaurants maintaining Streateries
also benefit from outdoor dining on the sidewalk. Those existing tables (sidewalk
and bistro dining) provide sufficient space to accommodate those who wish to eat
outdoors.
• They are a gift of public funds to specific restauranteurs. This is unfair to the many
restaurants that already maintain and pay rent for their outdoor dining spaces.
• They significantly reduce parking availability for the disabled.
• They pose a serious insurance liability to the City of Edmonds, should an accident
or injury occur related to the structures.
After your vote to END the Streateries, I suggest the following:
• Clarify fire and safety code compliance for sidewalk and bistro dining.
• Clarify if use of gas heaters is allowed and, if not, enforce use of appropriate
heating (assume electric).
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 43
Packet Pg. 58
8.2.a
• Encourage restaurant owners to accept reservations for outdoor dining, to
accommodate those who prefer to, or must for their or a family member or friend's
safety, dine outside.
• Convert a significant number of the parking spaces now being used for Streateries
to disabled parking spaces.
• If it is still felt necessary to support in order to support all restaurants and
businesses, consider converting key parking spaces to curbside pick-up only.
Regards,
Joan Bloom
Former Edmonds City Council member
From: Martha Karl
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 3:35 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
I I'm writing counsel today to support the downtown Edmonds streateries. I am immune compromised
and don't feel comfortable eating inside in Snohomish county as there are no vaccinations requirements
in most restaurants. The ability to eat outside is a big factor in weather I will spend my money at an
Edmonds restaurant. I also think it is worth noting the past 3 times I've eaten downtown I also visited
other edmonds businesses and made purchases totaling over 100$ Each time.
Please consider keeping these outdoor options available.
Martha Karl
From: Patrice Kettner
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Edmonds Streateries
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members,
My husband and I have lived in Edmonds for over thirty years and are both recently retired Registered
Nurses. We are fully vaccinated and have received our boosters. We continue to be uncomfortable
dining inside a restaurant.
The well designed Edmonds Streateries have allowed us to enjoy eating downtown Edmonds during this
prolonged uncertainty of the ongoing pandemic.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 44
Packet Pg. 59
8.2.a
Please follow the science and continue the Streateries at a very minimum until the beginning of summer
2022. Too much is UNKNOWN at this time about the Omicron variant. We do not yet know how
contagious or deadly this variant is.
It is much to early at this point to make a decision of such magnitude as we have only known about this
particular variant for approximately 2 weeks.
There is a very vocal, organized group of a minority of citizens that make their anti -science based
opinions know on the conservative media sources that dominate our town's news cycle. They also
dominate the public comments portion of the weekly City Council meetings. They do not speak for the
rest of us.
I implore all of you to follow the science and vote to continue the Streateries.
https://www.nvtimes.com/2021/12/07/briefing/omicron-variant-need-to-know.html
Thank you for your continued service to our community during these trying times.
Patrice Kettner RN
Bruce Ballard RN
From: Carol Junglov
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 12:59 PM
To: council@edmondswa.com; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
Dear Council Members and Mayor Nelson:
I fully support the Streateries and the curbside pick-up spots that many of our downtown restaurants
have. I have used both many, many times over the past year and without them, would not be spending
my dining dollars in Edmonds. Contrary to what some people claim, the pandemic is not over and until
Snohomish County has a requirement to show proof of vaccination to dine inside, I won't. I just started
to eat inside restaurants in King County because I feel safe knowing that everyone who enters has to
show proof of vaccination. If the streateries and curb pick-up go away, I'll be spending even more of my
dining dollars in King County instead of Edmonds. Even if I didn't use them, think it's festive how the
heaters and lights brighten up our dark winter nights.
Thank you,
Carol Junglov
Edmonds WA 98020
From: gretchen ziobro
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:47 AM
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 45
Packet Pg. 60
8.2.a
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: YES to streateries
Hello. I'd like to voice my support for extending the permits for Strateries. I am an Edmonds resident and
my family uses the steateries about once a week. We are grateful they are there as we avoid indoor
dining still due to COVID. We've never had any trouble parking — in fact, I haven't noticed that they've
made any difference in parking at all. Case in point, we ate outside at Salt & Iron Saturday night and
parked half a block away. I do think the restaurants should be paying for the space (beyond the permit
fee) as it does extend their real estate and it is public space that they are utilizing. Some have compared
the look of the streateries to a "shantytown." I actually find them really festive in the winter with their
lights and liveliness. Based on the sales tax numbers that were released yesterday, it sounds like the
streateries are not adversely affecting our retail shops, but if there are downsides that are impacting the
shops, the input of those retailers should be listened to and solutions found. Small businesses are the
lifeblood of our downtown and we need to support all of them.
Thank you for taking the time to hear my perspective.
Gretchen Ziobro
From: Cara Diehl
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:48 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment on Streateries
I'm writing to comment on my enthusiastic support of extending permitting of streateries in Edmonds. I
think opening up the public streets to dining enhances the beauty of downtown Edmonds rather than
detracts from it - the streets of a city center should be a place to gather and commune more so than a
place to park your car. I personally would like to see the city and its inhabitants think creatively about
how to encourage more biking and pedestrian activity. Having to potentially park a block or two away
from a restaurant or store is to me, rather flip in exchange for the benefit of streeteries. Eating and
convening in these outside gatherings offers aesthetic comforts - cozying up by a fire, lingering for
another beverage and more conversation during the warm summer hours and enjoying the late sunsets.
Beyond my enjoyment of the streeteries, I think there's an imperative to seriously consider that there's
feasibly no return to pre -pandemic life. The odds are that more airborne diseases will continue to crop
up and disrupt public life as we know it -- we have some infrastructure that enables restaurants and bars
to continue to operate and generate revenue while mitigating the risk of community spread. And also,
while I'm personally loath to make decisions rooted solely through the lens of capitalism - the research
done around retail sales during the summer of 2021 supports the concept that streeteries have not had
a material impact on their business profits.
Thank you for considering my position.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 46
Packet Pg. 61
8.2.a
From: Comcast
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 12:33 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: In support of outdoor dining areas
Dear Council President and Council Members,
Let me first thank you for your service to the City of Edmonds. Additionally, keeping public health and
safety a priority during these "Covid" times and having the difficult conversations due to the pandemic
has been and continues to be appreciated. Even though you signed on for public service, no one truly
signed on to service during a pandemic, so thank you.
The "street -eateries" or the extended outdoor seating was and still is a welcomed program for many of
us who understand the intent of keeping the public safe during a pandemic (which last I checked it looks
like we are on another variant) and supporting local restaurants. My family and I have enjoyed many
outdoor meals at various venues. Not only in Edmonds, but prior to the pandemic, outdoor dining was
something that I missed whether it was apres-ski or the bistro type tables in my small town or in NYC's
Time Square.
It is a false equivalence to compare retail with restaurants, in this case. Last time I was shopping, I did
not have to remove my mask to make a purchase, unlike dining.
If the program is not "seen" as equitable (as a few of you have indicated), in what ways can the we
support this program while creating an "equity"? Would it be a square footage charge for the parking
spaces the outdoor spaces occupy? Would restaurants like the Starbucks incur the same type of charges
since they have "sidewalk"/bistro type seating?
One of the most welcoming sounds during the darkest period of the pandemic was hearing the people
chatter while they were enjoying a meal, or the laughter over a drink at one of the local businesses.
Instead of looking back and saying 'we can't because we have always (you know the rest); let's look
forward and incorporate some of the innovations that sprung from a shut -down.
Thank you for your time.
Virtually yours,
Donna Murphy
Edmonds
From: Kclarke5
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 9:17 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Re: Amended letter dated 12/6/2021 Vote no on Streateries
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 47
Packet Pg. 62
8.2.a
Dear City Council,
Please note my letter on 12/6/2021 has been amended below. The Rusty Pelican was misidentified as
having tents in the alley way. Sankai on 4th Avenue is one of the restaurants who have erected the tents
in the alleyways.
Thank you,
Cheryl Clarke
From: Tiffany McClurg
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 7:53 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Downtown Streateries
To whom it may concern: I just wanted to voice my support for the numerous outdoor seating areas in
the downtown Edmonds core. They make the restaurants so much more accessible and fun. We love
walking along the sidewalks and seeing all the people enjoying meals together. It has added such a great
energy and cool vibe to downtown and we are still a lot more comfortable eating outside than inside.
Please keep them!
Sincerely,
Tiffany McClurg & Mike Wolf
Edmonds Residents
From: Howard Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 7:07 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Street restaurants
Please keep these. The pandemic is not over and I would not patronize a restaurant if the only choice
was indoor dining.
Howard Fankhauser
From: Jim & Shanna England
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 7:02 PM
To: Buckshnis, Diane <Diane.Buckshnis@edmondswa.gov>; Olson, Vivian
<Vivian.Olson@edmondswa.gov>; Monillas, Adrienne <Adrienne.Monillas@edmondswa.gov>; Johnson,
Kristiana<kristiana.johnson@edmondswa.gov>; Johnson, Laura <Laura.Johnson@edmondswa.gov>;
Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Paine, Susan <Susan.Paine@edmondswa.gov>;
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 48
Packet Pg. 63
8.2.a
will.chen@edmondswa.com
Cc: neil.tibbott@edmondswa.gov
Subject: PLEASE ELIMINATE STREETERIES I
Dear Mayor and Council,
Thank you for all your time and effort in leading our City.
We are residents and taxpayers of the once charming City of Edmonds. This is our first public opinion
comment in many years and we have never submitted a comment in My Edmonds News. Like many
residents, we moved here over 12 years ago because of the Edmonds charm, and the variety and
diversity of downtown businesses giving it that charm.
Please vote to take down all these Streeteries for the following reasons:
1. They make our main downtown streets look ugly and degrades our City's charm. Previously when
walking downtown, we used to hear many visitors comment how charming our downtown core is (all
businesses, not just restaurants). No "charming" comments now.
2. Streeteries are dangerous. It is going to take only one driver looking at a text message or something
then crashing their 5000 lb vehicle into a group of tables. This is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Also,
propane heaters pose a potential fire hazard, and even explosion upon collision. It is the taxpayers
who will be paying for those lawsuits.
3. Streeteries were started due to pandemic government restrictions. There are no restrictions
now. Restaurants can operate indoors at 100%. There are events inside at ECA, there are indoor
concerts, basketball games, open gyms, etc. And, is it really any more dangerous eating inside a
restaurant than in an enclosed Streetery space with heaters and sitting 2 feet across the table
from friends that you have no idea if they have been exposed to Covid in the last 14 days? Enclosed
Streeteries give a false sense of protection from Covid.
If some customers are still concerned about eating indoors, restaurants still offer pick up/curbside.
Then, customers can get food to go and take home, or maybe eat in their car down at the
waterfront with a view (that's what we do).
4. The "chosen few" restaurateurs are profiting from our lovely city giving them expanded spaces at the
expense of our limited and coveted parking spaces. Many restaurants already have outside dining, and if
they do not, they could possibly convert their front walls into foldable openings.
5. 1 learned in my Business classes at the University, that the restaurant business is one of the most risky
businesses to start, even before Covid. Why does our City feel so committed to give free handouts to a
very few and limited restaurateurs? And, we heard one of these chosen restaurateurs owns 3 of
these Streeteries? You do realize there are more restaurants now on Main Street than there were pre
pandemic?
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 49
Packet Pg. 64
8.2.a
6. Streeteries are not fair to the other businesses. Streeteries impact non-food businesses by creating
parking problems, access problems, and even clear sight of their business. "Downtown" means a
diversification and variety of businesses, not a Food Circus.
7. Streeteries and sidewalk tables DO NOT comply with ADA sidewalk width regulations. Why has the
city not been called on that? OR, has it?
Issues for people with limited mobility; they can not park close to the shops (what's left of them),
restaurants/bars (too many in small limited space), dangerous sidewalks, and not following ADA
regulations. Can't even imagine someone in a wheelchair or a family with a stroller trying to maneuver
the sidewalks around the Streeteries, their staff, tables and chairs on sidewalks, people congregating
around the tables, etc.
8. Some comments in My Edmonds News suggested they wanted Streeteries like Anacortes. However,
the street in Anacortes is at least twice as wide as our Main Street, and Streeteries just do not fit
in Edmonds.
Regarding the survey:
The Survey questions are preloaded for a positive conclusion to continue Streeteries, similar to
previous surveys orchestrated by Shane Hope on Housing.
The survey will not be accurate. You will receive many slanted pro Streetery votes from restaurant
owners and their support staff who profit from this, and may not even live in or be a taxpayer of
Edmonds. And, adjoining cities may cast votes too, as it is not clogging up their downtown streets. It
appears you can cast multi votes, and that is what we would do if our income would benefit from
Streeteries.
Also Council: if you have a conflict of interest with Streeteries, ie: your business provides service
to one of the Streeteries, please do not vote to continue Streeteries to make your business client
happy.
We want ALL Edmonds businesses to survive. Please clear our streets of these Streeteries. Time to
be fair to all Edmonds restaurants, retail shops, and businesses. Bring back our Edmonds
charm!
Thank you for your time.
Jim & Shanna England
Laurel Street
From: Jamie Milleson
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 5:03 PM
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 50
Packet Pg. 65
8.2.a
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Edmonds Streateries Comment
Hello,
I am writing in support of extending the streateries ordinance in downtown Edmonds. My family has
taken the survey but felt compelled to comment further in support of this extension. As a family with
young children who do not yet have access to vaccination, we rely on the streateries as what we see as
our only safe option to continue to dine out in Edmonds. Given the ever changing landscape of the covid
pandemic and the fact that our community remains at a high rate of transmission, this does not
seem like the time to remove this option from the community.
Thank you for your consideration in extending the ordinance. My family has really appreciated them and
our ability to safely eat at our favorite local restaurants has been a bright spot for our family through the
pandemic.
Best,
Jamie Milleson
From: Chris Griffen
Sent: Monday, December 6, 20214:36 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Re: Streateries Extension
As a resident of Edmonds, it has been interesting to see the amount of debate that the streatery 12/31
sunset provision has generated. To me, there is no question that they should be allowed to continue, at
least through the remainder of the pandemic.
As the parent of two children, one of whom is not yet old enough to qualify to be vaccinated, the
streateries have provided a safe environment to dine out as a family throughout the pandemic. To
shutter them now, as another variant potentially approaches, makes no sense. They were an ingenious
adaptation by the City to allow business to continue to operate during the height of the
pandemic. While it would be nice to think that we are out of the pandemic at this point and that they
are no longer needed, that is no more than wishful thinking.
I've read the criticisms of them posted on My Edmonds News and in the Beacon, but it seems to me that
the benefits they convey far outweigh any loss of parking or aesthetic impact. The criticism that they
represent some sort of unjust government enrichment to these businesses seems equally absurd.
They provide a tremendous value to the City and to those of us who reside here and dine here,
especially those of us with families. Please consider extending the sunset provision for the foreseeable
future, and consider reassessing that decision when the pandemic is behind us.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 51
Packet Pg. 66
8.2.a
Chris L. Griffen
Edmonds, WA 98020
From: Terra Mangum <terramangum@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:42 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
Hello Council,
Our family would like to extent the streateries through the summer. Our household is comprised of two
working nurse practitioners, a 94 year old great grandma, and two kids ages 2 and 1. We use the
streateries for the sake of keeping exposure to our kids and great grandma low. If we are eating with
people not from our household we would only do so outside. We have seen the impact of covid first
hand at our jobs and with babies who cannot be immunized we feel this is the safest way for us to enjoy
and support Edmonds. We think they look fabulous and fun too. We use the streateries most weeks of
the year and find them accessible for our friends and relatives with and without physical disabilities. We
have never enjoyed Edmonds more in our 34 years here and have frequented the businesses or
restaurants more now and during walkable main st than we ever have. Both streateries and walkable
main made things much more accessible and covid friendly for our health conscious family.
Thank you,
Dr. Terra Mangum
From: Laurie Cooper <Icoop96@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 2:39 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
The pandemic continues. I will not eat indoors until it is safe. The only way we will frequent restaurants
in Edmonds is if we are able to eat outside.
Laurie Cooper
From: Perry Janssen
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 1:58 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 52
Packet Pg. 67
8.2.a
Hello,
I am an Edmonds resident.
I am in full support of the Streateries continuing. We need our businesses to thrive in this
economy and
They are a crucial part of our community and we need them to have Edmonds thrive.
We need them to continue.
Thankyou
Perry Janssen
From: Megan Wolfe
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streetaries
I know there are a lot of strong emotions around the streetaries debate. I would like to fist applaud the
council and the mayor on finding a creative approach to a problem during a very difficult time. More
creative problem solving is needed everywhere right now. I hate that this issue has caused many people
to forget how to actually talk about solving problems and instead have turned to yelling and screaming
even when they don't understand the issue. I LOVE the streetaries and they are the main reason I spent
any time in downtown Edmonds during the pandemic. While downtown eating outside I was able to
shop in some of the stores and was happy to support our local businesses. I would love to have areas
closed to cars to create that type of atmosphere every summer. But I also understand that the small
shops need people to come down and shop easily. I support some compromise streetaries plan moving
forward and I think it'd be sad to do away with them completely but I mostly want to see the council and
the citizens angry about everything take a deep breath and remember that we can talk about solving
problems without it turning into a fight every time. I love the streetaries but I also love our local
businesses. I also see why some people don't like the streetaries but the prevalent approach to be
against them is to lie, scream, and not solve the problems. No one fighting against the streetaries plan
has put forth any ideas that I have seen other than "take it all down!" which isn't a great way to get
others on board. We can have a vibrant downtown eating scene and thriving businesses if we can focus
on the problems we need to solve and work together more often.
Thank you,
Megan Wolfe
From: Stephanie Anderson
Date: Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 1:09 PM
Subject: StrEATeries
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 53
Packet Pg. 68
8.2.a
To: <publiccoment@edmondswa.gov>
I am writing in support of keeping the streateries going. It ads charm and brings people together
downtown. I personally am not eating inside restaurants, and only eating where there is outdoor
seating. I frequent the restaurants often in downtown Edmonds, and hope to continue eating outdoors
with friends & clients!
Best, Stephanie Anderson
From: Pam Brisse
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:28 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: On the topic of our "streateries"
Hello City Council,
I'd like to share my view on the downtown StrEATeries with you in addition to completing the survey
and several public comments online. I'm concerned that Edmonds has successfully created the
reputation as a fun and cute place to eat and drink during the pandemic - not that that's a problem -
kudos to all who made that happen! The problem is that King County now has a vaccine passport
program and so the unvaccinated are looking outside of their county for dining and recreation locations.
This makes indoor dining in our area even less safe than it already was. If the streateries are dismantled,
there will be very few safe(r) outdoor dining options for those of us who either have heath concerns or
are just cognizant that the pandemic is far from over.
There are currently over 100,000 new cases a day here in the United States. Our school district hovers at
about 40 reported cases a week. Snohomish County is averaging about 250 cases per 100,000 resident
per week right now. While our case counts are trending down, King County is trending up with a 46%
increase last week. Children are still working on getting vaccinated and adults are trying to find boosters.
There is a new variant of concern. It is also cold and flu season. I will not be eating indoors in a
restaurant any time soon as the pandemic is not over.
I understand there is concern about parking and equity - perhaps it is time to ask restaurants to pay a
fee for these parking spots now that the program is successful and they are no longer at risk of having to
board up their doors and windows and lay off all their employees? Perhaps more handicapped parking
spots need to be designated for those who say they can not walk a block or two anymore?
I'd also like to make a suggestion that could solve both parking issues and make Edmonds into a
permanent outdoor dining destination: I suggest redesigning a couple of our streets into one -ways with
angle -in parking spaces and room for attractive permanent structures for seating, with attractive
plantings and trees - restaurants who wanted to could petition to rent and design these spaces and the
city could recoup costs of the project this way. It could solve everyone's concerns and complaints, and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 54
Packet Pg. 69
8.2.a
keep Edmonds a destination town instead of a drive -through ferry port town the way it has creatively
become during this crisis. I know I would enjoy permanent attractive and comfortable outdoor dining
spaces.
At any rate, I hope these streateries stay at least through the winter, if not until the end of the pandemic
(and I hope we can find a way to grow more permanent ones in the future). We have guests coming at
the beginning of the year who are looking forward to "those cute outdoor restaurants" - they have
grown on me too, now that they are lit up and full of people during peak dining hours.
Thank you,
Pam Brisse
Edmonds Resident
From: Kclarke5
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:31 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Vote no on Streeteries
Dear City Council,
I strongly opposed restaurants and bars using public parking spaces for outdoor dining. Many of these
establishments are pushing to have these remain permanently and making Walkable Main Street
permanent. By continuing to allow as is, takes away valuable parking downtown from the retail
businesses who, like the restaurants, are also struggling to get back on their feet. How are the retail
businesses suppose to survive if they continue to take away the customer parking? There are many of us
like myself, who still like to "shop local" and patronize the retail businesses. But cannot, because of the
limited parking and these unsightly structures in their place. Restaurants can operate at full capacity now.
The isno longer reason to allow these structures and tents to continue.
The wooden structures and tents known as "streateries" for outdoor dining have taken away the appeal
and charm of our city. Visitors who have come to visit have commented on how you can no longer see
the beauty and uniqueness downtown Edmonds has to offer. With no on street parking many of our older
visitors will no longer shop downtown. You either had to navigate around the wooden structures or the
parking spot was marked as "curbside pickup only." Here are just a few examples:
• Salt and Iron, has taken advantage by not only erecting a shelter on the street but have
added plexiglass- dividers between their sidewalk dining table. The ability to walk through that
area makes it difficult to pass both way, even for those who are physically able. How can they
continue to have both a shelter and sidewalk dining encroaching on the sidewalk?
• Daphne's has taken over parking spaces for a shelter and Curbside p/u only, they never had
indoor dining in the first place.
• Engel's Tavern keeps adding more space in front of the Red Twig to their outdoor dining.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 55
Packet Pg. 70
8.2.a
• Barkara, even though they already have indoor and outdoor dining, have taken over the two
parking spaces in front of their establishment, as well. (Thankfully, they have taken down their
unsightly tent)
• Rusty Pelican has erected unsightly tents in the alleyway.
• Other establishments have erected these tents in the alleyways, as well.
These are just a few examples of those who have taken the liberty to use basically use "free" taxpayer
space, for a mere 120.00 a year. How can this continue when other businesses no longer have the
parking for their customers? And what about the taxpayers who pay for these roads and parking spaces?
Who is accountable to the taxpayer? This will only escalate if these structures and tents are allow to
remain indefinitely. As one local citizen put it, it does look like a "shanty town". No longer can you see
down to the waterfront and the holiday decorations that adorn the storefronts and line the streets.
Recently, the Seattle Times wrote a glowing article about our downtown. Interestingly enough, they use
an "old" photo of the downtown before the outdoor dining. Not what it looks like today. I applaud Kristiana
Johnson with her Edmonds Focus campaign paper who actually showed a picture of what the city looks
like with these "streateries" looking west on Main from 6th Avenue. It does look like a "Shanty Town" and
is appalling.
Our family has lived here for more than 66 years. We have always loved being able share our city with
visitors and attend the various events, Art Fair, Fourth of July Parade, Tree Lighting, etc. Edmonds does
have it's own unique charm and is a beautiful place to visit and live. Allowing these unsightly structures to
remain permanent or even into next year takes away from the beauty it has to offer. I would hate to see
the various retail businesses close up shop because the mayor and city council cannot see the harm this
is doing to our city by allowing the structures to stay into the next year. I encourage the City Council and
the Mayor to vote no. Return the charm to Downtown Edmonds now. Do not extent this eyesore into
the new year.
Respectfully submitted by,
Cheryl Clarke
Edmonds, WA 98020
From: Sara Pearson
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:00 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Support of Streateries
I support extending the permits for the downtown Edmonds Streateries. It's critical to continue
to provide safer outdoor eating environments during this Pandemic. I would like to continue to
support my local Edmonds restaurants but am not always comfortable eating inside and the
Streateries provide a welcoming atmosphere.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 56
Packet Pg. 71
8.2.a
Thank you -
Sara Pearson, Edmonds Resident
From: Cynthia Sjoblom
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 10:03 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: To Edmonds City Council: Sat. Night streateries.
I was planning to do this myself but I thank Janelle for providing this data for us. It's time to make
"sound" decisions! Respectfully, an edmonds resident.
Cynthia Sjoblom
Watch "Saturday Night Edmonds Streatery Usage" on YouTube
https://voutu.be/esbdQC5tTal
From: Michael Murdock
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 7:17 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
Good Morning,
I walked downtown Tuesday night two weeks ago. I encourage all of you to go look and examine them
carefully.
They were mostly empty during 4-6PM on a nice night. Look at the barriers to traffic on some of them
They won't stop anything. From purely a public safety standpoint they are not going to stop possibly
severe injury and city liability. I have stated this before.
Appears there are no standards for safety and inspection during all this time.
Please do the right thing and have them removed now before someone gets hurt.
Thanks,
Mike Murdock
From: Amanda Bradshaw
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 20219:23 AM
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 57
Packet Pg. 72
8.2.a
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
First, I'd like to thank our councilmembers for your consideration. I wanted to reach out regarding the
streateries in Edmonds and the survey that was recently composed to inquire regarding the public's
feelings regarding these structures. First, the survey missed the opportunity to ask whether these
Streateries deter people from visiting Edmonds, and whether they detract from the atmosphere of our
downtown. From personal experience, our family who had previously visited downtown Edmonds
whenever possible to give our business to our local vendors, has made the decision to refrain from
visiting Edmonds recently on many occasions due to the concern for parking. There is also a concern
regarding the safety of having dining so close to moving traffic. These are not complete structures, and
there is very little barrier between traffic and diners. In addition, in a time where we have been focusing
on equity, it is inequitable to favor main street dining over our downtown shops, by limiting the ability
of their shop patrons to easily access their storefront. The combination of Streateries, parking slots
reserved for curbside pick up and the increased presence of paid parking lots have significantly limited
access to the downtown core. Walkable weekends further limit access. We want all of our downtown
businesses to thrive, not just a select few restaurants. Please consider removing these structures, and
restoring the charm and access to Edmonds.
Sincerest Thanks!
Amanda
From: Pete Spiess
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 10:13 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
I want to express my support to keep the streets open to businesses to expand their
opportunities by keeping the streetery going, people over car parking. Peter Spiess, Edmonds,
Wa, 98026
From: Michael Murdock
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 8:16 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streateries
Good Morning,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 58
Packet Pg. 73
8.2.a
My wife and I don't believe in or use Facebook. I suspect others in Edmonds don't use it as well.
Other residents may be being missed with information both young and seasoned.
I was downtown at 4-6 PM and the streateries were empty. Those eating in establishments that
were open were inside eating. They no longer serve any purpose and should be removed.
It is a shame that all that parking is not available now for the Christmas shopping season for all
merchants. Why are they still there?
Regards,
Mike Murdock
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 7, 2021
Page 59
Packet Pg. 74
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 14, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
12-14-2021 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 75
8.3.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
December 14, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human
Services Director
Rob English, Acting Public Works Director
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural
Arts & Human Services Director
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Program Mgr.
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council special virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:41 p.m. by Mayor
Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We
acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors
the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these
lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual
connection with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely.
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. RESOLUTION THANKING ADRIENNE FRALEY-MONILLAS FOR HER SERVICE ON
THE CITY COUNCIL
Council President Paine read Resolution 1482 thanking Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her service
to the Edmonds City Council January 5, 2010 to December 31, 2021.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 76
8.3.a
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON,
TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1482, THANKING COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS
FOR HER SERVICE TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE ITEM 8.7 TO THE FIRST AVAILABLE AGENDA IN
JANUARY.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if items can be removed from the agenda of a special meeting. City
Attorney Jeff Taraday commented the Council is about to have a closed session regarding labor issues. If
a Councilmember would like to pull one of the labor related items from the Consent Agenda to take other
action, he requested that be deferred until after the closed session so the Council can be fully informed
about the potential ramifications of that action.
Councilmember Buckshnis clarified Councilmember Olson's motion was to move Item 8.7 to a January
meeting. Mr. Taraday said he understood that.
Councilmember Olson asked if what Mr. Taraday stated was relevant to her motion. Councilmember
Buckshnis' question was whether items could be removed from a special meeting agenda which was the
intent of her motion. She was aware that agenda items could not be added, but believed items could be
removed. Mayor Nelson relayed Mr. Taraday's advice was to make that determination following the
executive session regarding the labor related items.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, Councilmember Olson's motion was to remove Item
8.7, not 7.7. Mayor Nelson pointed out Item 8.7 on the published agenda is MOU EPOA Non -
Commissioned Referral Payments. Councilmember Olson asked what agenda item Ranked Choice Voting
was. Mayor Nelson advised it was Item 9.7.
Councilmember Olson said her motion to move that to January was because it was moved from the floor
and was not on the agenda or the extended agenda, some citizens wanted more time to research and
prepare comment. Mayor Nelson suggested in the future Councilmembers state the name of the agenda
item and not the number.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN,
BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES;
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
MOVE THE ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES AHEAD OF HIGHWAY 99
GATEWAY SIGNS, FROM ITEM 9.4 TO 9.3.
Councilmember K. Johnson said there is a lot of interest in the streateries and that item is scheduled for an
hour. The Gateway Signs are less timely so she wanted to ensure the Council was able to complete the
streateries discussion tonight.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 2
Packet Pg. 77
Councilmember Olson pointed out there may be consultants present for the Gateway Sign agenda item.
She asked how Councilmember K. Johnson felt about that and suggested Councilmembers consider that
when they vote.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there were consultants waiting to discuss Highway 99 Gateway Signs
and, if so, it should be moved up. Acting Public Works Director Rob English advised a consultant team
will present that item.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she had not heard a reason to switch those items, one item was
scheduled for 45 minutes and the other for 1 hour. She was concerned with reversing the order of those
items when consultants were present. She encouraged Councilmembers to vote against the amendment to
avoid paying consultants while they waited.
AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING YES.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments.
Cynthia Sjoblom, Edmonds, said differences aside, she thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her
service to Edmonds residents. She gave a heartfelt apology to citizens who participated in last week's
Council meeting. Her actions were out of line and she let her fellow citizens and herself down and
disrespected the office of Council. She asked that everyone accept her sincerest apology. For any citizens
who was owed an apology by Council earlier this year such as, Carolyn Strong and Susan Hughes, she
apologized to them on behalf on the City Council. She knew going forward into the new year would be a
better year. Next, she urged the Council to sunset the streateries, advising she was downtown Saturday
event and there were only three groups of two in all the streateries she photographed. Additionally, Ken
Reidy, an Edmonds government watchdog, has identified a violation of streateries that obstruct sidewalk
rights -of -way. An advocate for the streateries, Hubert Ho, owns at least 5-6 Edmonds restaurants and the
proposed $500 to $750/month posted in My Edmonds News would not be a fair exchange to the
taxpayers. She suggested the restaurants with streateries open their books to City staff to show whether
there are currently experiencing a hardship. The bottom line is there is no longer a state of emergency and
she hoped Council would consider the greater good of all City residents. She also opposed ranked choice
voting and has spoken with many citizens who feel the same and she hoped the Council would vote
against it.
Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, addressing the Mayor, Councilmember and owners of streateries, said it is the
holidays, a time of gratitude and goodwill, a time to be thankful and give back. Some downtown
restaurant owners were given a generous gift by the City 1 %2 years ago with the right to temporarily take
over public property to extend their dining space outside and help them financially through the worst of
COVID. After 6 months, the restaurants were granted a one year extension. The downtown area lost
parking and sidewalks shrunk, forcing pedestrian to walk through narrow passageways through
restaurants and bars. Structures create a hazard for drivers and are a blight on the charming downtown. It
is cold and rainy and the streateries sit empty most of the time, taking up valuable space, blocking
storefronts and mountain, sound and ferry views which everyone loves. Most people have been
vaccinated and choose to dine inside; others who still want to eat outdoors have many restaurant options
downtown and elsewhere in Edmonds that offer outdoor dining on their own property including many
restaurant with streateries that already had existing outdoor dining. Finally the year is up and streateries
are scheduled to sunset on December 31 V. Restaurants have recovered and are prospering after receiving
hundreds of thousands of dollars in PPP and City, County and State grants.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 3
Packet Pg. 78
8.3.a
Ms. Brewer continued, with all this help, including the free public property they have been provided by
the City, some owners have opened new restaurants in Edmonds and Seattle. Good for them, but she
questioned whether they needed to continue occupying the downtown streets and sidewalks. The
restaurant owners and their supporters are asking for yet another extension which Council will vote on
this evening. She said enough is enough; residents and other business owners have shown compassion
and support for the restaurants but many are losing patience. The need no longer exists and they want
their downtown back. Those who want the streateries to remain should keep in mind that these structures
cannot continue occupying public property because it is not fair. The property belongs to all the residents
and they have the right to fully use it. The streateries are a benefit for a few at a cost to all. She requested
the Council and restaurant owners do what is right and allow the streateries to sunset. This holiday season
be thankful, show gratitude and goodwill, give back and give the best gift many residents would like this
year, our charming Edmonds back.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, commented on the selection of projects resulting from the 2016 PROS Plan as
well as the CFP and CIP for Parks and Public Works and Utilities. The State of Washington is making a
more than $8 million investment in SR 99 in 2022. She thanked City staff for working on grant funding
for the State to invest in the roadway that divides her community. The Public Works and Utility Plan
includes 22 investments of City funds for City Park, Wade James Theater, Yost Pool, Meadowdale
Clubhouse, Edmonds Library, Historical Museum, Log Cabin, Frances Anderson Center, a fishing pier
and Boys & Girls Club in addition to the investment of City funds identified in the Parks Plan which
includes nearly $6 million of City funds for Civic Center in addition to funds for Yost Pool and
downtown beautification in 2022. She thanked the State for their investment in Highway 99. With regard
to the selection of projects reflected in the City Parks CFP/CIP she reminded that the basis for these
investments in the 2016 PROS Plan was deeply flawed and prejudice.
It did not use the definition for regional community and neighborhood park that were adopted in City
code, instead creating specialized funding definitions that required regional parks have a scenic view of
the sound and shoreline, functionally guaranteeing that investments were excluded from the SR 99 area
and other communities, providing grossly disproportionate opportunities for certain communities to
influence outcomes. Six of the seven community intercept events were held downtown, the seventh event
was at Yost and sited all of the five year capital investments in areas already identified by the level of
service analysis as well resources. These investment decisions are incredibly biased. She urged the
Council to make changes to the 2022 CFP/CIP to equitably invest City resources in all areas of the City
and not commit to any more agreements that would require further park investment in the downtown
areas while so many neighborhoods go without even basic park resources. She thanked the Council,
especially Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, for their service.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, said the original plat of Edmonds was filed at Snohomish County in July 1890.
The plat document states that George & Etta Brackett hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all
the streets and alleys platted thereon. Use of the public forever is pretty easy to understand; streatery
permits are issued to private businesses for private use. Prior to the adoption of interim zoning Ordinance
4209 for streateries, the City Code was consistent with the clear intent of the Bracketts. The City Code
stated no portion of the public right-of-way designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking shall be
permanently occupied. Ordinance 4209 then created an exception for streateries; suddenly making
streateries the only private improvement that could permanently occupy a portion of the public right-of-
way for months and months. No public hearing was held until last week. He did not think the exception to
allow streateries to permanently occupy streets was consistent with the clear intent of the Bracketts.
Streets and alleys are dedicated to the use of the public forever. Streets that the City has improved and
opened for public use are designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking. Why would anyone think
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 4
Packet Pg. 79
that exclusive use of parking stalls by private parties was consistent with a dedication of use to the public
forever?
Mr. Reidy continued, Ordinance 4209 states all streatery use shall be entirely within the approved spaces.
The words "entirely within" are very clear and words matter. Streatery use was not kept entirely within
the approve spaces as required by Ordinance 4209; streateries spilled onto the sidewalks and some are
permanently attached to the sidewalks. Street use permits are for uses temporary in nature which means
not having or requiring permanent attachment to the ground. The sunsetting of Ordinance 4209 on
December 31St will end code violations such as streateries that are not located entirely within approved
parking spaces. Sunsetting will also allow for compliance with the clear intent of the Bracketts. Parking
stalls within the rights -of -way are supposed to be available for use of the public. He thanked
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her many years of service and hard work. He understood being on
Council is a very challenging role and she has worked hard for many years and he wished her the best in
the future.
Alex Marek said he works in downtown Edmonds and many of his coworkers have jobs because of the
streateries. Guests thank them daily for having the streateries where they feel safe. They especially
appreciate having the outdoor structures during the holidays when people are not comfortable gathering in
large groups at people's houses. The streateries have helped them make it through the pandemic, have
helped him keep his job through the pandemic, a pandemic that is far from over. The overall theme from
the opposition is that this issue does not need to be discussed further, that the COVID variants are done, a
sentiment he wholeheartedly disagreed with. He and his wife utilize streateries and outdoor dining
whenever they go out and they visit downtown Edmonds at least once a week. When their friends visit
from Ballard and Seattle, they also want to sit outside. He urged the Council to allow the streateries to
continue.
Jen Lawson, Edmonds, said many downtown Edmonds merchants, restaurants, and streatery participants
have come together to provide a joint statement of support for the extension of the streateries program
based on the following considerations: the two industries have always co -existed in a mutually beneficial
way, bringing a vibrant sense of community and economic vitality to the area. Unprecedented times like
these require innovative action to ensure local retailers and restaurants continue to thrive in a fair and
equitable environment. Recognizing the need for neighboring restaurants to survive during the pandemic,
a majority of DEMA members supported the installation of the streateries, an important lifeline in
maintaining the downtown corridor. Retailers also struggled during the pandemic and unlike restaurants,
were given no special accommodations to improve sales. Some were hit harder than others, sandwiched
between streateries or losing sales due to fewer parking spaces. Instead of restaurants and shops closing,
they have survived what hopefully has been the toughest part of the pandemic. DEMA recognizes that a
downtown corridor thrives when both restaurants and retailers exist in harmony and cooperation. The
local restaurant streatery participants acknowledge that the City got creative and provided the industry
with a means to serve customers outside during reduced capacity.
Ms. Lawson continued, the streateries provided and continue to provide the necessary opportunities for
guests to dine in a safe, open air atmosphere as well as allowing the local restaurant industry to continue
to keep hundreds of staff employed. Local restaurants thanked DEMA for their early support and
continued partnership. The two groups propose the following items as consideration for the final
extension of the streatery ordinance: restaurants with streateries are more than willing to contribute funds
toward a cause that benefits all and propose a range of $500 to $750/month for the usage of two parking
stalls. Funds collected from the streatery participants should be allocated directly toward leasing
replacement parking spaces at nearby private lots. Additional considerations should include wayfaring
signs and a communication plan with paid advertising. Safety is paramount to the success of the program;
the original intent of the streateries was to provide a safe dining atmosphere for patrons especially those
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 5
Packet Pg. 80
8.3.a
unable to be vaccinated. The streateries should be compliant with current City building codes, be up-to-
date with the City business license and any fees related to the downtown core. For those who do not wish
to take part in the streateries any longer, they proposed a 30-day takedown period to ensure enough time
to hire and plan the job.
Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, commented residents are facing another water rate increase in 2022. Last
January he pointed out that over the previous two years, the City had retroactively applied the rate
increase to water usage that occurred in the previous year. The approved ordinance states when the rate
changes are effective, the first of the year. By his calculation, this equates to an additional $150,000/year
in revenue which is collected not in accordance with the ordinance. He was also told the Council would
take up this issue prior to the end of 2021, yet the Council has not. The City will now collect almost
$500,000 from water utility users over the last three years; he questioned who would step up and rectify
this as it seemed illegal to him. He referred to the agenda item related to amendments to the 2021 budget,
and asked why the amendments were not done prior to approving the 2022 budget as these proposals
affect the beginning fund balance. He noted this was another example of why the elimination of the
November Finance Committee meeting was so wrong and rushing the 2022 budget so outrageous. He
hoped the new Council and new leadership will have better oversight of the City's finances.
Marjie Fields, Edmonds, spoke regarding marsh restoration funds as listed in the CFP/C1P materials.
She recognized the Council all cared about making the marsh a functioning estuary again and had even
seen some Councilmember working in the mud to remove barriers to waterflow. It is a complicated issue
with different ideas regarding how accomplish shared goals. The Council has heard different
recommendations about where marsh funding should be listed in the CIP/CFP. On the surface it may not
sound important but there are implications and probable unintended consequences linked to which City
department officially oversees marsh restoration. Returning funding to Parks emphasizes the status of the
marsh as a park, a wildlife reserve with a future that provides recreational and educational opportunities
for citizens. Listing even a portion of the funding under stormwater suggests a different vision. Other City
parks such as Yost have flooding problems without becoming stormwater projects; she questions why
was the marsh funding moved and have the resulting impacts on residents water bills been examined. She
requested the Council entirely remove marsh funding from Page 73 under stormwater in the CIP/CFP.
Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, referred to an application notice she received on Thursday for PLN2021-
0066 for a 24-unit apartment with 24 parking spaces underneath at 605 and 611 Main Street. She is on the
second floor and faces southwest with about 98% of her property across the alley from this proposed
building. She was shocked it would be allowed to be built covering the entire site right up to the edge of
the alley; all other buildings on the lane have a setback. All construction is to be off the alley. The alley is
only 15 feet wide and three condo owners have garages facing the alley as does the condo behind them
which will be blocked during construction. She questioned how long construction would take. Two
vehicles cannot pass in the 15-foot wide alley unless there is a setback a vehicle can move into. She
questioned where all the vehicle and other family members would park. Her now light -filled windows are
only 10-feet past the alley; she will be looking at a 3-story wall and directly into their windows. She will
lose all privacy, light and enjoyment of her home and will probably not be able to see the sky because it is
so close.
Ms. Fireman said another concerning part of the application is the statement, "structures on the adjacent
parcels do not support the intensity of development under the current zoning and Comprehensive Plan and
are anticipated to eventually be replaced with higher density development. The proposed project is seen as
a guide for future redevelopment allowed and encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan." She noted 615
Main was just purchased and is now owned by 615 Main LLC and anticipated it will be torn down too.
She asked about emergency vehicle access during construction and whether moving trucks and repair
trucks would block the alley. She has lived in her condo for six years and construction close -by has been
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 6
Packet Pg. 81
8.3.a
constant, noisy, dirty and stressful. The beautiful, quaint, historic downtown that draws many is
disappearing. She requested the Mayor, Councilmembers and other government departments start
thinking about the well-being of existing residents. She urged residents to speak up as their home may be
affected next. An Architectural Design Board meeting scheduled on January 5, 2022 has been cancelled
and there is no notice of another meeting.
Shubert Ho thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and Director Patrick Doherty for their years of
service to Edmonds, and being valuable resources and dedicated advocates for community progress. He
thanked both for making Edmonds a better place, saying they will be missed. He owns Feed Me
Hospitality, comprised of a group of restaurants in the area that participate in the streateries program, a
program that has affectively provided their company and many others the ability to serve in the safety of
an outdoor atmosphere. He wholly supported the extension of the program due to the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic and the restaurant industry still being in recovery. He has reached out to many Councilmembers
to voice his opinions, solutions and outlook; some weigh questions of politics, he is weighing questions of
purpose and place. Feed Me Hospitality will always have a purpose and place in the community doing
what they do regardless of the existence of streateries. They serve the people of Edmonds and visitors
with memorable experiences, they utilize their pandemic -born community kitchen to feed the food
insecure in the community, and they employ over 300 individuals who depend on the City's innovative
thinking to carry them through this turbulent time.
Mr. Ho continued, the decision the Council makes tonight will have a profound effect on the lives of
many workers who have served the community since long before they were elected. At the end of the day
politics comes down to votes; perhaps if Councilmembers think they budge from their anti-streatery
position they will lose the support they need. However, if downtown retail owners and restaurant come to
the Council with a compromise, the Council should listen. Streatery restaurants and a large number of
local area merchants have come together hoping to bridge the gap so that Edmonds can move forward in a
safe and communicative way. He urged the Council to carefully consider the compromise they submitted
with an open mind. The conversation may be about streateries now, but as of the last meeting, a new
audience has emerged, individuals who will be paying close attention to the precedent the Council is
setting and how Edmonds emerges from the pandemic.
Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, expressed her support for having the streateries removed by the sunset date
of December 31 st, stating they are dangerous and take up parking, the ones attached to the sidewalk
should repair any damage caused by their removal, and they are unneeded and unused. Persons of smaller
stature have a difficult time seeing them when driving and some extend beyond the parking space. She did
not think the streateries prevent COVID as occupants have their masks off 75% of the time. For those
who are vaccinated and have had a booster, the Omicron variant is supposed to the mildest of all and
similar to the flu. She did not think the streateries were needed any longer and they were not fair to people
unable to come downtown to shop due to the lack of parking.
Finis Tupper, Edmonds, said the new Welcome to Edmonds sign on SR-104 is delightful and charming,
but is missing a disclaimer such as good luck finding a parking place. Edmonds has always had parking
issues and lax enforcement. When the City allowed restaurants to install the streateries, Edmonds
residents and visitors lost 25 free spaces. In 1989 the City Council approved a contract to lease property
from Rainer Bank for a municipal parking lot on 3" Avenue between Dayton and Main Streets. This
parking lot included 25 parking places, some leased to downtown businesses but most provided free
parking for shoppers and diners visiting downtown. The property lease was changed to a month -to -month
lease in 2019 with Bank of America and signed by then -Mayor Earling. The City Council was never made
aware that the property lease was canceled or about negotiations to keep the municipal parking lot. The
Mayor and City staff do not have contracting authority.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 7
Packet Pg. 82
8.3.a
Mr. Tupper continued, on August 27, 2020, without proper public notice, City staff scheduled a Hearing
Examiner meeting for a conditional use permit to establish commercial paid parking lot on the longtime
municipal parking lot. The applicant was charged with the responsibility of mailing notice of the hearing
to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed site. The applicant sent notice to taxpayers' addresses
which they obtained from the Snohomish County Assessor, not the property owner addresses as required
by the City. Staff did not post notice at the Public Safety Building, the Library, the US Post Office on
Main Street as required by City code. He requested the taxpayers be given back their parking spaces and
wished all a Merry Christmas.
Joe Scordino, Edmonds, said every year for the past three years he has asked the Council to take marsh
restoration out of stormwater in the CFP and every year that has not happened has resulted in more
problems with preserving the natural functions of the marsh, let alone trying to restore it. Although he
sent multiple letters spelling out all the past and new problems the Stormwater CFP is causing, there seem
to be some Councilmembers who don't want to discuss those problems and a simple majority simply
rubberstamps it each year. This year he was taking the simple approach; rather than restating all the facts
and rationale over and over to no avail, he was making a simple request by asking the Council to delete
Page 73 in the Public Works CFP/CIP which resolves all the problems moving forward with restoring and
preserving the Edmonds Marsh as well as the natural environment that so many people enjoy. The
abundant public record for such a decision is all in past written comments and public meetings. Budget
minded Councilmembers and the public should be aware that the ridiculous $17 million estimate in the
Stormwater CFP for the marsh is causing an $8.6 million increase in the tax base for utility rates which he
found absurd. He urged the Council to listen to informed citizens and simply remove Page 73; the marsh
restoration is then covered under the Parks CFP which is where the public wants it and is where it
belongs.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.)
7. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY PER RCW
42.30.140(4)(A)
Mayor Nelson asked how long this item was estimated to take. Council President Paine suggested 15
minutes. Mr. Taraday advised if the Council stated it would last 15 minutes, the meeting could not be
restarted for 15 minutes so he suggested starting with 10 minutes.
At 8:34 p.m. the Council recessed to a closed session to discuss collective bargaining strategy per RCW
42.30.140(4)(a). Elected officials present were Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Fraley-
Monillas, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Chen. Mr. Taraday was also present.
At 8:43 p.m., Mayor Nelson advised the closed session would be extended for 10 minutes to 8:53 p.m. At
8:53 p.m., Mayor Nelson advised the closed session would be extended for 5 minutes until 8:58 p.m.
The closed session concluded at 8:58 p.m. and the meeting was reconvened.
8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 8
Packet Pg. 83
8.3.a
2. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM STEVEN DO MAR
& WILLIAM SHIMEALL
3. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES ON THE PHASE 3 STORM
UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT
4. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BLUELINE GROUP, LLC, FOR THE
CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
5. CONTRACT WITH HASA INC FOR SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FOR THE WWTP
6. MOU EPOA COMMISSIONED RETENTION & REFERRAL PAYMENTS
7. MOU EPOA NON-COMMISSIONED REFERRAL PAYMENTS
9.. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. 2021 DECEMBER BUDGET AMENDMENT
Finance Director Dave Turley explained there are four requests tonight; more detailed information is
contained in the Council packet. If approved, this budget amendment would increase forecast revenues by
$8,773,456 and would increase budgeted expenditures by $2,739,009. Two of these amendments
represent required transfers of budget authority from one fund to another, and two are to record the effects
of our recent bond sale. There is no new cash outflow as a result of these entries. He reviewed the
proposed 2021 December Budget Amendment requests:
• Allocates the Council -approved ARPA funds spending to the funds where the expenses were
incurred.
• Provides authority to transfer $535 to the Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund, in accordance with
the State of Washington's 1% for Arts Program.
• Records the effects of the advance refunding of the portion of the City's 2012 Bonds on behalf of
the Edmonds Public Facilities District.
• Records the effects of the bond sale to provide funds for Civic Field ($1,634,447) and for other
capital projects ($4.4 million).
Mr. Turley explained all four decision packages are to record activity that has already occurred, all four
are mandatory entries, and none of them represent new spending.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised the Finance Committee reviewed the proposed amendments and
recommended approval.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4241, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4236 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME W HEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. ADOPTION OF THE 2022-2027 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) & CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
Acting Public Works Director Rob English reviewed:
• CIP/CFP schedule
o October
■ Planning Board — October 13
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 9
Packet Pg. 84
8.3.a
■ City Council presentation — October 26
■ Planning Board public hearing — October 27 (recommendation in staff memo)
o November
■ City Council public hearing — November 1
■ Council discussion — November 17
o December
■ 60 Dept of Commerce review ends —December 10
■ Adopt CFP into the Comprehensive Plan — December 14
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4242, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2022-2027 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN ELEMENT OF THE EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON,
TO MOVE $12,950,000 FROM PWD 02 FUND WHICH HAS $17 MILLION DOLLARS IN IT, TO
PRK 7; 25% WOULD REMAIN IN THE STORMWATER FUND.
Council President Paine explained she offered this as way to maintain a presence in both the Stormwater
Fund and add funding for the Edmonds Marsh to the Parks Fund. This maintains the project in the
Stormwater Fund when seeking grants. There has been a lot of discussion about allocating Stormwater
funds for the Edmonds Marsh, but there are seven streams coming in and Stormwater funds are being
used in a large part to fix the Perrinville problem.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she was strongly opposed to this and hoped the amendment would not be
approved. The $17 million represents a project by Shannon & Wilson for the initial 2013 hydrology
project, the ditch along the railroad tracks that WSDOT and City negotiated without Council approval.
The $17 million is arbitrary and includes berms and stormwater and has nothing to do with the Edmonds
Marsh restoration. Page 72 was created which deals with stormwater and what can happen in the marsh.
Her recommendation is to remove it completely because the $17 million is an arbitrary number just like
Perrinville is an arbitrary number because no restoration plan has been provided. She did not want to
include numbers that were not representative of what has actually transpired or what the Council has
approved.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she has done a lot of research on this; the EPA and other reputable sites
identify a marsh a habitat for wildlife, but every one also lists stormwater functions. To separate the
stormwater function of the marsh from the habitat portion does not make sense. The argument that the
City may be short changing itself if it is not in one fund over another, that argument can be made the same
way, especially with everything that is known about stormwater runoff and how tire particles affect
salmon. The City may be losing the ability to obtain funding with a stormwater component. She
supported a 25%/75% split although she might have done a 50%/506% split, but it still keeps a portion in
stormwater to recognize the stormwater component of the marsh.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she did not support the motion. Shannon & Wilson did study for the
stormwater project, Daylighting Willow Creek, but due to the narrow land they considered, it is basically
an open ditch next to the buried ditch and is not really salmon friendly, there is no natural diffused light
and the total cost was $17 million. Saying that there are seven streams that go into the marsh is not true,
there are two major streams. Mentioning Perrinville Creek is also irrelevant because the projects are apple
and oranges. The $17 million is related to daylighting Willow Creek specifically. She referred to the
reasons provided by Joe Scordino, a NOAA scientist, for removing the project. She did not support this
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 10
Packet Pg. 85
8.3.a
motion but would support a motion removing the $17 million from Stormwater and including a smaller
amount in Parks & Recreation for the entire marsh restoration, not just the stormwater component of the
restoration. Including those larger expenses, increases the cost to ratepayers which is a disservice. For all
those reasons, she did not support this 75/25 motion.
Councilmember Chen relayed his appreciation for Mr. Scordino and Councilmember Buckshnis taking
him on a tour of the marsh and educating him. He agreed with the experts that this is a Parks project. He
was concerned if all the funding was removed, was there a possibility that stormwater grants would be
missed.
Councilmember Buckshnis recognized this is very confusing for those who have not followed the project
for the last 11 years like she and Mr. Scordino have. She referred to Page 72, Edmonds Marsh Water
Quality Improvement, which deals strictly with stormwater which means rates are predicated on that
dollar amount. That project has the $450,000 grant from NOAA that was pulled last year, and $750,000 in
ARPA funds. Page 72 deals with water quality and stormwater issues. For those that believe regressive
taxing is not important, she pulled the 2019 rate utility report, noting for many years there was nothing in
stormwater for Willow Creek Daylighting and suddenly $16 million showed up. In 2019 $8.6 million in
Stormwater was factored into utility rates. There is no preferred contractor for the nearshore marsh
estuary restoration and therefore Page 73 should be removed because Page 72 takes care of the
stormwater component. She did not want the $17 million included in next year's rate study.
Council President Paine asked about the impact to rates. Mr. English responded $8.3 million was the total
project cost in the rate study but it also anticipated $6.9 million in grant revenue, so the difference was the
project cost in the rate study. Council President Paine recalled when she asked for those numbers earlier
this summer, the impact on rates was far less than $8 million. She recalled the approximate ratepayer
impact was less than $1 million. Mr. English said he did not have those numbers tonight.
Councilmember Olson said it is clear grant money can be sought for the stormwater functions regardless
of whether the funding is in Parks. She found the motion and idea reasonable but she will support
transferring the entire amount to Parks for a more holistic approach.
Councilmember L. Johnson said according to NOAA, saltwater marshes are coastal wetlands that are
flooded and drained by saltwater brought in by the tides. Their intertidal habitats are essential for healthy
fisheries, coastline communities. They provide essential food, refuge or nursery habitat for more than
75% of fisheries species. NOAA goes on to say they reduce flooding by slowing and absorbing rainwater
and protect water quality by filtering runoff and by metabolizing excess nutrients. They have a
stormwater component so it is appropriate that part of the funding is placed in Stormwater.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Angie
Feser's opinion. Ms. Feser answered the Parks Department has very limited staff resources to take on a
$17 million project or portion thereof and she would turn to Public Works to help with that work. The
Unocal property is a big piece of this and the future of that property including ownership and eventual use
will factor into this considerably. Until property ownership is established, she not unsure how much of a
planning or design process for marsh restoration should occur, therefore, seeking grants for the greater
marsh property will be challenging, especially if the City does not have ownership of the Unocal property.
She summarized it can be listed in Public Works or Parks but short term projects are unlikely to be fast
moving. One of the reason she brings forward Marina Beach is because it is a piece of the marsh system
that the City can work on now. In January she will present the grant agreements for Council consideration
to allow a component of the marsh to move forward.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 11
Packet Pg. 86
8.3.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if Ms. Feser believed it was not in the best interest of the marsh
and the daylighting of Willow Creek to do 75%/25%. Ms. Feser said in her professional opinion, she
would support dividing the project between departments because it is a citywide project. Projects have to
be listed in the CIP/CFP to be eligible for RCO grants and she assume it was similar for stormwater
grants. This is a very large project, and it is unknown whether the amount is $17 million, but Marina
Beach Park, a small component is about $5 million, and there are potential acquisition costs for the
Unocal followed by the true restoration work on all that land. Many grant funding sources will be
necessary to move this project forward. The 2022 PROS Plan will be coming forward in January and
February with the Parks CIP/CFP based on community priorities. It will be interesting to see another
project in the Bowl through the lens of the PROS Plan. More answers will be available in
January/February when the PROS Plan and capital plan associated with that is presented.
Mr. English said a split was not necessarily a bad approach. The big challenge will be the need for
matching funds in the future regardless of the cost of the project and Stormwater is a potential source. It is
difficult at this time to say what the number will be in the future. The approach that has been suggested,
apportioning to Stormwater and Parks, is reasonable.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS CALLED THE QUESTION. VOTE TO CALL THE
QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS
AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS
K. JOHNSON, CHEN, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON, TO REMOVE PAGE 73 WHICH REPRESENTS $17.2 MILLION LODGED IN
STORMWATER.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the Council has never confirmed a contractor to do the entire marsh
restoration. The number is arbitrary based on something that was contrived during the Waterfront
Connector project. There is a separate Stormwater component on page 72 that will deal with the
stormwater which has up to $1.5 million in grants. Parks Construction has a Parks Marsh Construction
project with an amount to be determined. The cost and timing is unknown so this motion cleans up the
document.
Mayor Nelson asked where the $17.2 million go. Councilmember Buckshnis answered the CFP/CIP is
only a planning document and does not affect the 2022 budget.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked where the $17 million goes. Mayor Nelson said it is just being
removed from Stormwater in the planning document. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if would be
used for Stormwater eventually. Mayor Nelson answered he did not believe so.
Council President Paine asked Ms. Feser if she anticipated seeking grants at the end of 2022 for 2023.
Ms. Feser answered Marina Beach has grants lined up pending a decision by Council. She asked if the
question was whether staff would seek additional grants related to the marsh property. Council President
Paine asked if she foresaw in the grant cycles of the granting agencies that there may need to be funds in
that pocket. Ms. Feser answered applying for grants requires at least 30% design which generates a cost
estimate, unless it was land acquisition because there is some idea of the value based on appraisals and
market value. A lot more work needs to be done in order to submit a grant application related to the marsh
east of track. She could not apply for grants without more design work or appraisals for acquisition and
did not see that happening in 2022.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 12
Packet Pg. 87
8.3.a
Councilmember Chen relayed his understanding that removing the $17 million would not impact 2022
Stormwater or Parks, but he did not want the Council to lose sight of long term planning. If the funds are
removed from Stormwater, he hoped the Council would return to Park planning in 2022.
Councilmember Buckshnis assured the discussion would come back to the Council. The last
recommendation from WRIA 8, when no funds were allocated for the design, was to figure out the
property issues. If the City is fortunate enough to get that property or if it is transferred, that changes the
entire makeup of how the property can be restored and developed. The City needs to wait until the land
ownership is figured out before moving forward on the design. She agreed with Ms. Feser that there are
too many balls in air to do any specific planning. Taking the project out of Stormwater will remove it
from consideration during a rate study.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
CHEN, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING
YES; COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there was a decision package for a rate study next year. She had some
other issues, but due to the late hour, she was ready to pass the CFP/CIP and wait until next year. She
asked if the consultant rate study was retroactive. Mr. English answered no.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO ADD A $250,000 A DESIGN COMPONENT TO THE 4TH AVENUE
CULTURAL CORRIDOR IN THE 2022 BUDGET.
Councilmember K. Johnson said it was initially included in the CFP/CIP in the amount of $200,000 or
$250,000 but was not included in this version. She said this came from the Creative District's
recommendation.
Council President Paine commented this is the CFP, the CIP was adopted with the budget. She did not see
anything regarding the Cultural Corridor and she was surprised to hear it being added as a last minute
addition. She asked if it was appropriate to add it at the last minute if it was not included in the CIP. Ms.
Feser answered technically the 4t' Cultural Corridor is listed in the Parks CIP as PRK 3 and identifies
approximately $8 million for a project from design through construction but does not start work until
2025. There is $1 million each allocated in years 2025 and 2026 and the remaining $6 million in 2027. It
is in the Parks CIP; the motion was to add $250,000 in 2022 to begin the design work sooner.
Councilmember K. Johnson relayed she has been following this project for some time and recalled there a
5-year plan was needed to carry out the capital project for the Creative District and the 4t' Avenue
Cultural Corridor was identified as that capital project. Initially the intent was to complete that in the last
4 years in order to be timely. If the project does not start until 2025, it will not be timely so some
incremental progress needs to be made. When the Council considered this project this summer, the
Council agreed to the project amount and gave conditional approval for the allocation of funds. She
summarized there is a difference between what the Council did then and what it is doing now.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of clarification, advising the amount was $150,000.
Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the legislative agenda regarding Highway 99 community renewal
which states the Highway 99 corridor and its surrounding neighborhoods have historically been
underserved with lower levels of parks and public spaces, community gathering facilities and safe
multimodal transportation improvements. She came on the Council and into a city that for decades has
focused on the Bowl, inheriting numerous projects that have been in the works for years. She appreciated
the work people have done, but just because something has been in the works for years does not mean an
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 13
Packet Pg. 88
8.3.a
inequitable distribution should continue. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor is an exciting project and
maybe another way to go about it can be found. She could not support once again putting money into
another project in the Bowl due to the need for truly equitable distribution. She did not support the
amendment.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON CORRECTED THE AMOUNT IN THE AMENDMENT TO
$150,000.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas encouraged Councilmembers not to support the amendment. There are
no sidewalks and inadequate lighting in the area around Highway 99 and the east side of Edmonds needs
to be raised to the same standards as the Bowl instead of continuing to pump money into the Bowl
especially for arts corridor. Although she understood the importance of the arts corridor, the areas around
Highway 99 need lighting and sidewalks for people to safely reach parks and schools. She recalled
Councilmembers ran campaigns based on supporting Highway 99 and the surrounding neighborhoods;
voting no is an opportunity to do that.
Council President Paine did not support the amendment for the reasons stated by Councilmembers L.
Johnson and Fraley-Monillas. Putting the project into the CFP also seems like a weird way to ask for a
budget amendment when the 2022 budget has already been adopted. She agreed it was grossly unfair to
have funds dedicated to projects in the Bowl and not on Highway 99 which offers another view of a
cultural corridor.
Councilmember Chen did not support the amendment. He loved the idea of art and agreed Highway 99
has tremendous opportunity. During his campaign, one of his moonshots was a multi -cultural performing
art center on Highway 99. He invited artists who are thinking about the 4t' Ave Corridor to brainstorm
about Highway 99 and bring it from the Bowl to Highway 99 to benefit the Edmonds community but also
the greater region.
Councilmember K. Johnson said this is related to the Creative District which is located in downtown
Edmonds. The Creative District is performing arts at the ECA and creative businesses such as restaurants,
art galleries and individual artists. Edmonds was the first Creative District in Washington; each district
must have a plan and a capital project. Edmonds' designation as a Creative District includes an obligation
to have a capital project within the 5-6 year planning period. She wanted to allocate a small amount to
continue making progress on this project on which funds have already been invested. There is support
from the community and 100% support from Council. This takes nothing away from Highway 99 where
$100 million could be spent. This is only $150,000 to continue to make progress.
Councilmember Buckshnis did not think projects needed to be mutually exclusive and the City could do
both. If the Council decides next year they don't want the Creative District designation, it can lapse. She
looked forward to planning events on Highway 99.
Councilmember Olson agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis about not necessarily being mutually
exclusive but there are budget limitations. She agreed with what others have said about the priority not
being another Bowl project because there have been so many. She reminded Council that her moonshot
idea was an art walk that flanks Esperance Park and connects to Highway 99. Parking solutions are
desperately needed in the downtown area, possibly that could satisfy the need for a capital project for the
Creative District.
Councilmember L. Johnson said using the arts as justification is still upholding an inequity. Even with the
arts, if they are not equitably distributed, it is an inequity. That is what this would be and that is what has
been done for so long and it needs to stop. The idea that the City can do both, one had been done for so
long, it was time to start on the other one before any more money is allocated for the Bowl.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 14
Packet Pg. 89
8.3.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said some say $150,000 is insignificant, but it would pay for sidewalks
for people to reach the only park in east Edmonds. Every day she watches people walking down the
middle of the street to reach the only park on the east side of Edmonds. The arts are important to
Edmonds, but until there is fair and responsible equity, we are just our spinning wheels. Those who say
they support Highway 99 but vote for this are disingenuous. She encouraged Councilmembers to vote no
and if anything is done, the funds should be allocated toward the only park in east Edmonds.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED TO AMEND TO MOVE $150,000 OUT TO 2023 AS A
PLACEHOLDER. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON AND
BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, FRALEY-MONILLAS, OLSON AND
L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. HIGHWAY 99 GATEWAY SIGNS
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss advised this is a brief presentation on the Highway 99 Gateway
Signs proposed on the north and south ends of the corridor as part of a much larger project, the Highway
99 Revitalization project. The project team includes Jim Howard and Rachel Dotson, HBB, Clayton
Moss, Francis Chapin, Rob English and himself.
At the September 28, 2021 presentation to Council, different sign options for both locations were
discussed. Over the last 2%2 months, the project team has developed 4 design alternatives for both
locations and the alternatives have been presented at several Highway 99 Task Force meeting as well as a
public workshop in mid -November and an online survey requesting the public identify their preferred
design alternative. The intent of tonight's presentation is to discuss what was learned from the meetings
and public outreach and at the conclusion, get a recommendation from Council on the preferred
alternative for both locations so the signs can be incorporated into Highway 99 revitalization contract.
Rachel Dotson, HBB, reviewed:
Process
o Project timeline
■ Background & Site analysis - May - early April 2021
- Task Force Meeting #1
- WSDOT Art Plan Review
■ Gateway Visioning - Summer 2021
- Task Force Meeting #2
- Task Force Meeting #3
- City Council Meeting #1 & 2
- WSDOT Art Plan Review
■ Concept Alternatives - Autumn 2021
- Task Force Meeting #4
- Community Workshop #2
- Task Force Meeting #5
- City Council Meeting #3
- WSDOT Art Plan Review
■ Construction Documentation - Spring 2022
- 90% Construction Documents
- WSDOT Art Plan Approval
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 15
Packet Pg. 90
8.3.a
- 95% Construction Documents
- 100% Construction Documents
■ Construction - 2022
Project Goals
o Overall Goals
■ Recognize this stretch of Highway 99 as a part of Edmonds.
■ Welcome visitors to the Highway 99 corridor but also to the whole of Edmonds.
■ Identify key entry points to Edmonds and differentiate Edmonds from other cities along
the Highway 99 corridor.
■ Celebrate the corridor's unique character.
■ The overall design should be coherent with other Edmonds signs
o Goals that are Important to the Community
■ Natural elements
■ Modern
■ Sustainability
■ Sans -serif font
■ "Welcome to Edmonds"
■ Signs compliment each other
■ Similar to other Edmonds signs
■ No solid monuments / hiding spaces
■ Maintains visibility to adjacent businesses
■ Low -maintenance and vandal resistant materials
Survey #2 Results
0 201 total survey participants
0 374 total comments
o Nature of comments related to project
■ 99.8% supportive
■ 0.2% unsupportive
o Methods
■ Flier/mailer
■ Task force
■ Facebook
■ Press release
■ City website
o Open 2.5 weeks (Nov 17 - Dec 5)
o Preferences from Survey # 1
■ North: Vertical sign in median with architectural element at back of sidewalk
■ South: Horizontal sign
Overall Preferences
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 16
Packet Pg. 91
8.3.a
Overall Preference...
Sign A
Sign B
Sign C
Sign D
Most Preferred Least Preferred
Sign A
Sign B
Sign C
Sign Q
o 10% P 30K I 03% M M A 9M x101c M M M " 4 %% m M B M 1
Edmonds
K00oil
Survey Results
o Sign Alternative A Feedback
■ South and North: Sign A
■ Feedback
- 103 comments received
- Prefer a horizontal sign, substantial base dislike the leaves or unclear of the meaning,
like the colors
- 33% most preferred
- 20% least preferred
o Sign Alternative B Feedback
■ South and North: Sign B
■ Feedback
- Dislike the colors; doesn't stand out/hard to read/ bland
- Like the flags
- 93 comments received
- 6% most preferred
- 46% least preferred
o Sign Alternative C Feedback
■ South: Sign C
■ North: Sign D
■ Feedback
- 101 comments received
- Prefer a horizontal sign or mix; like the wave, posts, or maritime character; like the
horizontal letters; good visibility/sentence structure
- Note: community preference for a horizontal sign at the south gateway location and a
vertical sign in the median with a feature at the back of the sidewalk at the north
gateway location is consistent with feedback from the 1 st online survey
- 54% most preferred
- 8% least preferred
o Sign Alternative D Feedback
■ South and North: Sign D
■ Feedback
- 77 comments received
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 17
Packet Pg. 92
8.3.a
- Prefer a horizontal sign; like the wave or maritime character; don't like the
vertical/reading letters vertically
- Note: community preference for a horizontal sign at the south gateway location and a
vertical sign in the median with a feature at the back of the sidewalk at the north
gateway location is consistent with feedback from the 1 st online survey
- 7% most preferred
- 26% least preferred
Recommendation
o North: Vertical sign in Alternative C
o South: Horizontal sign in Alternative C
■ Overall goals
- Natural elements
- Modern
- Sustainability
- Sans -serif font
- "Welcome to Edmonds"
- Signs compliment each other
- Similar to other Edmonds signs
- Natural elements
- No solid monuments / hiding spaces
- Maintains visibility to adjacent businesses
- Low -maintenance and vandal resistant materials
Landscape Character
- Low growing, evergreen shrubs and groundcovers
- Seasonal interest with color and texture
- Trees at south gateway could be a conifer tree or flowering deciduous trees as a
backdrop - located to not block views to dealership
- Trees, shrubs, and groundcovers at north gateway could be in median and back of
sidewalk to help enhance the gateway
Layout of plantings
o South sign
■ Geranium
■ Mount Vernon Lauren
■ Moon Bay Nandina
■ Sword Fern
■ Venus Dogwood
o North sign
■ Geranium
■ Mount Vernon Lauren
■ Moon Bay Nandina
■ Persian Ironwood
Mr. Hauss said City staff strongly supports Alternative C based on the project team's experience and
survey results. The intent is to get design on the preferred alternative started as soon as possible as it will
be incorporated into the median project which is already at 90%. It is hoped the project can be advertised
project late February/early March; construction is scheduled to start in spring 2022 and be completed by
the end of next year.
Councilmember K. Johnson referred to the recommendation slide and asked if a horizontal sign had been
considered in the planting area on the north side, commenting the area was nearly equivalent to the area
on the south. Ms. Dotson answered it was considered, but unfortunately the photo does not show a very
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 18
Packet Pg. 93
8.3.a
large Magic Toyota dealership sign. In considering that option, it was agreed the two signs side -by -side
would compete for attention. Councilmember K. Johnson said she was surprised WSDOT approved the
sign in the median; when she worked for the New Jersey Department of Transportation, they never
allowed any vertical signs in the median as they were considered a safety hazard. Mr. Hauss said the
raised median will not be a 6" curb; there will be a 20" raised curb and a 2-foot offset from the fog line to
the face of the curb. He agreed if the median was a 6" curb the vertical sign would likely not be allowed,
but this will be 14" higher than the standard curb. Councilmember K. Johnson said that is not reflected in
the drawing. Mr. Hauss explained it was the same height as the median at the signal from 224' to 228.
Councilmember L. Johnson commented a beautiful welcome to Edmonds significant was unveiled today
so it is fitting that the Council is considering and hopefully approving a sign that will welcome people
when they enter Edmonds on Highway 99. She appreciated all the input that went into the signs and found
the signs very visually appealing and easy to read.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH FINAL DESIGN OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVE C.
Councilmember Olson suggested the design team consider whether the survey answers could have any
bias based on the fact that the only horizontal option was Alternative C and whether elements that people
liked from Alternative A could be incorporated. She suggested "Edmonds" on the horizontal sign follow
the curve rather than being straight.
Councilmember Chen said he was on the task force and they discussed more information than was
presented tonight. He referred to acquiring property next to the Toyota sign just for landscaping. The task
force discussed that but he wanted the full Council to discuss it. Mr. Hauss explained the right-of-way
line is about 1 foot behind the back of the sidewalk. He referred to the recommendation page, advising the
areas identified as 1, 2 and 3 are approximately 1400 square feet and the area identified as 6 is
approximately 400 square feet; those represent the right-of-way take plus a 10 foot temporary
construction easement. Using the square foot land value obtained from other parcels as part of the right-
of-way phase, the value is about $45/square foot so the estimated right-of-way cost for both areas is
approximately $65,000. That is one of the options the right-of-way consultant will review with the
property owner. Another option is a right-of-way easement which is usually 50% of the value,
approximately $30,000 - $35,000. During the initial discussion with the property owner, they suggested
they could maintain the area identified as 6 so there would not be any right-of-way take. He concluded the
options range from $35,000 for an easement to $65,000 for a full right-of-way take.
Jim Howard, HBB, advised approximately $35,000 - $40,000 is estimated for plantings, irrigation and
site prep. Mr. Hauss said adding right-of-way and construction, the cost for landscaping behind the
sidewalk is approximately $100,000.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she spoke with the property owners on the north and south and they
both agreed to this. The Volkswagen dealership is interested in an "up and down sign" so it does not
block their vehicles. The sign in the median on the north end was most appropriate. She express support
for the project.
Councilmember Chen commented if the City acquired the property from private owners, it would cost
another $100,000 as well as ongoing maintenance. If the City acquired the land anyway, he suggested
putting the most popular horizontal sign used on the south on north end as well and not install the
potentially hazardous vertical sign in the middle of the highway.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 19
Packet Pg. 94
8.3.a
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY PAINE TO EXTEND 30
MINUTES UNTIL 11:00. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING
NO.
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
FOREGO ACQUIRING PRIVATE PROPERTY FROM THE TOYOTA OWNERSHIP AND JUST
GO WITH THE CENTER MEDIAN SIGN.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the owner of the Toyota dealership was agreeable to what has
been proposed.
For Councilmember Olson, Mayor Nelson clarified the motion was related to areas 1, 2, 3 and 6 on the
Magic Toyota property. Councilmember Olson asked if the sign proposal committed the City to
purchasing property from Magic Toyota and if the motion was to change that. Mr. Hauss agreed, the
motion is to not acquire the areas identified as 1, 2, 3, and 6 on the Magic Toyota site which is currently
included in the recommendation and only install the sign in the center median. Councilmember Olson
asked if this could be returned to Council if this was a problem when it was presented to the contractor;
the Council is available for special meetings if necessary for something time critical.
Councilmember Olson recalled another Councilmember was concerned there might be an issue if the
signs were not accepted as recommended and what the property owner agreed to. She supported the
Council voting for what they wanted to see happen and if there is a problem, staff will return to Council.
Acting Public Works Director Rob English agreed, relaying there was only an initial conversation with
the property owner. If the Council approves the recommendation as proposed, those discussions will
continue and if there are any issues, staff will come back to the Council. Councilmember Olson expressed
support for the motion, anticipating the landscaping on the Toyota site will not be viewed as part of the
project.
Council President Paine asked if this amendment would put the design back to the drawing board. This
design has been presented eight times between the Planning Board and City Council and it differs from
what Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the property owners agreed to. Mr. English said a different
design would need to be considered if the intent was to put a sign on the private property side. Council
President Paine did not support the motion, the City has been able to purchase property in the past with no
trouble and if the property owner is in agreement, she wondered what the question was.
Councilmember K. Johnson recalled Councilmember Chen planned to make a two part amendment. She
supported retaining the landscaping if and only if there was a horizontal sign in that location; otherwise it
will be viewed as landscaping on private property.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said this is condemnation of property and she was not interested in
forcing the Toyota dealership to provide land for the City's sign. She recalled there was a reason why a
horizontal sign was not proposed on that side of the street, maybe because there wasn't enough land or it
would be in the middle of a bunch of other stuff. She reiterated she was not interested in condemnation of
land to install a sign. Mr. English explained the existing vertical Toyota sign would compete with a City
sign in that area which is why the center median was the preferred choice.
Ms. Dotson displayed a photograph of the Toyota site and identified the dramatic slope. In considering
early concepts, the slope cut the horizontal sign in half, reducing visibility and legibility. A sign in that
area would also compete with the large, white, vertical Toyota sign. People were attracted to a median
sign that would be visible when driving both south and north and that overshadowed the Toyota site
location. Mr. Howard said the vertical sign in the center median was more of a landmark, more visible,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 20
Packet Pg. 95
8.3.a
noticeable and unique. There was a lot of positive feedback from the public in survey for the center
median sign.
Councilmember Chen said Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' comments opposing condemnation were
actually supporting his amendment. His amendment was not to condemn private property just for
landscaping, it was to keep the center median and not touch the Toyota site at all.
Councilmember Olson said that was what she understood Councilmember Chen to say and it makes total
sense. The center median sign looks great and everyone is happy with it, but the large expense for
landscaping on the other side of the street that does not even look like it is part of the sign project does
seem like a good expenditure.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed putting a sign in the middle of Highway 99 is a very good thing
and very visible, but she was not interested in condemnation of any property for a sign. She expressed
support for the amendment.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON CALLED THE QUESTION. VOTE TO CALL THE
QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess 10:33 to 10:38 p.m.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council consider meeting tomorrow or Thursday. There
are another 1 %2 hours of agenda items, requiring the meeting last until midnight which she found
unreasonable. She relayed her understanding that some of the items were very important and needed to be
completed this year.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO THURSDAY NIGHT.
Council President Paine asked if this would be an adjournment where the meeting is stopped and
continued on Thursday as was done a couple weeks ago. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said his
understanding of the motion is to adjourn this meeting to Thursday night. This is a special meeting which
means if the motion passes, Thursday's meeting would be an adjourned special meeting where the
Council does nothing other than continue where it left off with this agenda and no changes could be
made. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said that was the intent of her motion.
Councilmember Olson said typically adjournment was to the next day. She asked if the Council has the
authority and opportunity to adjourn the meeting to Thursday. Mr. Taraday said the City Code
contemplates that adjournments are to the next day. If the Council votes to move the meeting to Thursday
instead, it is within the majority's power to do that. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was also
fine with adjourning to tomorrow night.
Mr. Taraday recognized that tomorrow night is not ideal for some and that some Councilmembers were
not comfortable with the concept of adjournment even though it is expressly allowed under the OPMA
and City Code. If the Council would rather not have an adjourned meeting, they could have a special
meeting on Thursday with a new meeting notice and new agenda, but that would require more legwork.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said her motion was to continue the meeting and Thursday night is
definitely her preference and probably the preference of a couple other people.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 21
Packet Pg. 96
Council President Paine said the meeting was already continued to 11. She preferred to get as much done
as possible before then. If the Council agrees, the meeting can be adjourned to Thursday, pick up where it
left off and start at 7 p.m.
Councilmember Olson suggested doing the streateries agenda item and address the remaining items at the
adjourned meeting. The ordinance extending Edmonds streateries has been a long awaited agenda item
and it may be more thoughtful to discuss that item for members of the public who are still present.
Councilmember K. Johnson expressed support for motion and preferred to consider the ordinance
extending the streateries on Thursday. Her earlier motion to move it up on the agenda was because she
felt it was of higher importance than the Highway 99 signs, but she lost that argument. She supported any
method of stopping this meeting and continuing it on Thursday.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not support the Council discussing streateries at 10:45 p.m., as her
first meeting today began at 1:00 followed by Council committee meetings and the Council meeting. She
preferred to continue the meeting on Thursday. Insisting the Council move forward is probably not the
best idea at 10:45 p.m.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if there were consultants present for any of the other agenda items.
Mayor Nelson said possibly the lobbyist. Councilmember L. Johnson agreed streateries may take a while
and supported continuing the meeting on Thursday. If there is a consultant present for an item, she would
support addressing that item.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order, commenting Councilmembers do not make the
best decisions 4-5 hours into a meeting or in some cases, 8-9 hours into a meeting. Mayor Nelson ruled
that was not a point of order.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Taraday clarified for record, this meeting will be adjourned to 7 p.m. on Thursday, December 16,
2021. There is 12 minutes left before adjournment and the Council still has the ability to extend this
meeting if they wish. When this meeting ends, it will be adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday.
Council President Paine suggested the Council consider Agenda Item 6.
6. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SERVICES AGREEMENT
Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office offered to provide a brief presentation and answer questions. The
Council packet contains a PowerPoint presentation which she can review or the Council can simply ask
questions.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE NEW PROSECUTING ATTORNEY LEGAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR JANUARY 1, 2022 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2023.
Councilmember K. Johnson requested Ms. Cates summarize the significant changes in the contract. Ms.
Cates said the main change is the name of the firm changed from Zachor & Thomas to Zachor, Stock &
Krepps; the firm includes the same attorneys the City has been working with for several years. The City
has been working under amendments to the Zachor & Thomas agreement for several years; this is a new
agreement but it is substantially the same as the previous agreement. There is an increase in the current
fee; the current monthly base is approximately $18,000 and the fee in the proposed agreement is
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 22
Packet Pg. 97
8.3.a
$23,625/month and increases once the Edmonds Police Department body worn camera policy is in full
force; it is currently a pilot program. The majority of the increase is based on the fact that the Police
Department has adopted a body worn camera policy and it is Zachor, Stock & Krepps's position that there
will be a significant amount of video to review. The increase also includes time spent on developing
diversion courts, alternative courts, things that could eventually decrease the amount of prosecution and
defense time. She summarized the increase in the monthly fee and the name change are the primary
changes to the agreement.
Councilmember K. Johnson relayed her understand that in previous agreements one-third of their time
was spent on DWLS. She wondered it that will play a significant role in reducing expenses for the
prosecutor. Ms. Cates said that had an effect in the last agreement; the base rate was in the upper $20,000
previously to Amendment 5 which will expire at the end of 2021. Zachor & Thomas took a 15%
reduction int their fee to $18,000 to take into account DLWS3 is not being charged any more. The
additional work as described has increased the fee.
Councilmember Chen inquired about the process for selecting a prosecuting attorney. Ms. Cates
explained the City did one year extension of the Zachor & Thomas agreement last year in part to give the
City to do a Request for Proposals. The City did an RFP in 2019, received 2 proposal, 1 from Zachor &
Thomas and 1 from John Rodabaugh. The City decided to do another RFP for prosecuting attorney
services in 2021 which was done in September and October 2021. Only one proposal was received from
Zachor, Stock & Krepps. There has been some discussion in the past about potentially bringing
prosecution services in-house, but that was not part of this year's discussion.
Councilmember Chen relayed his understanding there was not a bidding process. Ms. Cates said the hope
would be to have more than one proposal; it is technically a competitive bidding process but unfortunately
there are not a lot of firms in the area that do prosecution work and only one proposal was submitted.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
FRALEY-MONILLAS, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER CHEN ABSTAINING.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO ADJOURN UNTIL THURSDAY AT 7 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
In accordance with ECC 1.04.020 and RCW 42.30.90, as the Council had not completed its business by
10 p.m. (extended until 11:00 p.m.), by Order of Adjournment, the Council meeting was recessed and
adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, December 16, 2021. The meeting will resume at the point in which
the December 14t1i meeting was adjourned. The meeting was recessed and adjourned at 10:58 p.m.
4. ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES
5. 2022 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
7. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RANKED CHOICE VOTING
This item was postponed to the first available agenda in January via action taken in Agenda Item 5.
10. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 23
Packet Pg. 98
8.3.a
12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
13. ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 24
Packet Pg. 99
a+
a
8.3.a
Public Comment for 12/14 Council Meeting:
From: Monica Floreno
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 5:10 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment: For Edmonds Streateries
To Edmonds City Councilmembers,
I have been a resident of Edmonds for 10 years, raising my son here who is almost 11. We are a social
little family and involved in the community, schools, churches and sports organizations. Councilmember
Olson, you gave my son a swim lesson at our local gym when he was 6, and you were awesome! He
learned so much in that 1 session! I love that this town can feel small and supportive!
As active participants in this community, we (along with so many) have had to be creative to see others
safely during this pandemic - it has been challenging. An incredible gift to us has been the streateries in
downtown Edmonds. To me they are a sign of grit, creativity and inclusiveness. I personally have not
been comfortable bringing my child to eat inside a restaurant during this pandemic; and especially as we
move into winter with the uncertainties of the new variant. Pre-covid we were regulars at many
downtown Edmonds restaurants, and once the streateries were built - we were able to support the local
businesses once again while bringing some normalcy back into our lives. If these were not here, we
would need to stay home. While others have different comfort levels and views about the pandemic as a
whole, there are tons of us in this town who handle our precautions differently. These streateries have
and will continue to be such a blessing for so many as this pandemic is certainly not over.
This past Friday, December 10th, we were lucky to snag a spot in the streatery at Taki Tiki, our favorite.
We were there from about 6 to 7:30 or so and it was packed — young, middle -age and older folks alike.
We saw my son's former teacher there and it was so nice to socialize and be out and about! It was
pouring down rain and between the warm heat lamp, sparkling lights, the sound of the rain on the
streatery mixed with people laughing and chatting... it felt good. A bit of normalcy along with a sigh of
relief and a whole lot of fresh air.
On behalf of so many, I ask you to please keep the Edmonds streateries. At the end of the day, the
streateries have been an innovative way to bring us all together... no matter which side you lean. There's
something to be said about supporting local businesses while breaking bread together safely... even if
you're on the other side of the window.
Thank you for your time!
Monica Floreno
From: Lynda Fireman
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 20214:07 PM
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 25
Packet Pg. 100
8.3.a
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
I will be making a public comment this evening. (Here is my comment:
I am Lynda Fireman of 600 Bell. I'm speaking about the Notice of Application PLN2021-0066 for the 24-
unit apartment with 24 parking spaces underneath at 605 & 611 Main Street.
I face SW with about 98% of my south facing side across the alley from this proposed building. I am in
shock that it is allowed to be built covering the entire site right up to the edge of the alley. Every other
building on the lane has a set -back.
All construction is to be off the alley. 3 of us in the condo have garages that face the alley as is the
condo behind us. Will we be blocked during construction?
The alley is 15 ft wide. 2 cars cannot pass unless there is space in a set -back that one can move into.
How can we accommodate more vehicles? Where are other family members going to park?
My now light filled windows are about another 10 ft, at the most, from the alley. I'll be looking at a 3-
storey wall & directly into their windows. I will lose all privacy, light and enjoyment of my home. I
probably will not be able to see the sky.
Another worrying part of the applications is this statement:
"Structures on the adjacent parcels do not support the intensity of development under the current
zoning and comprehensive plan and are anticipated to eventually be replaced with higher -density
development. The proposed project is seen as a guide for future redevelopment allowed and
encouraged by the comprehensive plan."
The building at 615 Main is owned by "615 Main Street LLC" so this is just the start.
Questions:
• When finished, will their moving trucks & any repair trucks be blocking the alley?
• What about safety & emergency vehicle access?
I've lived here 6 years. There's been constant construction going on close by. It's noisy, dirty & stressful
but never like this.
Our beautiful, quaint, historic downtown that draws everybody in is disappearing. I ask that our Mayor,
Council Members and other Government Departments start thinking about the well-being of the
Residents who live here.
Residents, please speak up — your home may be affected next!
From: Stephen A. Fesler
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 1:07 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Extend the Streateries
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 26
Packet Pg. 101
8.3.a
This is an easy decision: extend and expand the streateries program. This program should even be
available to other retail uses.
Stephen Fesler
From: Ron Eber
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:26 AM
To: Paine, Susan <Susan.Paine@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: RE: Public Comment on Marsh Restoration
Council President Paine: Here is my explanation of how I understand the plan amendment process
works under the City Code and why I believe the Council needs to act before December 31st to schedule
any plan amendment for 2022 now. The "action" is what some call "docketing an amendment" but that
term is not in the City Code.
The City Code (20.00.010 and .020) and Growth Management Act permit only one amendment to its
comprehensive plan per year. Either a private party or the City may propose an amendment. Requests
must be in writing on a form provided by the Planning Services Director and submitted no later than
December 31St or the first business day after that if it falls on a holiday or weekend (like for 2021. The
Council may also accept an application after the deadline for "good cause."
It is not clear who would prepare and submit the required forms for a proposed amendment submitted
by the Council. However, the form provided me by the planning department is oriented towards a
submittal by a private party and not the Council. However, it does not require a full and complete draft
of the proposed amendment but only a "description of the project" and how it meets and applicable
codes.
I again request that the Council take action (docket) this year to initiate an amendment to the
comprehensive plan before the deadlines specified in the City Code. Specifically, the Council should
direct Planning Services to initiate the amendment process so that appropriate changes and provisions
can be developed for consideration in 2022. Many thought this was to happen in 2021 based on the
City's budget adopted in 2020. But somehow that was deferred to 2024.
The proposed changes should:
1. Identify for deletion any references or provisions for the now defunct Edmonds Crossing (easily
identified in the current comprehensive plan) and
2. Develop any needed provisions needed to guide the restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. The
description for the Marsh restoration is the following:
"Establish a Regional Wildlife Sanctuary and Recreation Area in public ownership on the southern end
of the Edmonds Waterfront that includes the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary, the old Unocal property, and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 27
Packet Pg. 102
8.3.a
Marina Beach Park. The Sanctuary Area will be interconnected with a tidal channel from Puget Sound
to the Edmonds Marsh and nature trails, pedestrian bridges, and boardwalks for outdoor recreation
and bird -watching. The Regional Sanctuary Area will be managed for aquatic and avian wildlife
protection and enhancement, outdoor recreation and education, and other activities that can be
accomplished consistent with and as secondary uses to wildlife conservation."
With this direction, the plan amendment process can begin as set forth in the City Code with full citizen
outreach and participation. Advisory committees can assist the Department with the development of
the needed provisions, goals and policies as well as important supporting inventory and background
information. Once a draft is developed, it can be available for public review through the Planning Board
and then onto the City Council for consideration and any final changes prior to adoption. How the
possible amendments comply with the applicable City Codes can also be developed along with the
proposal and be part of any adoption ordinance.
Thank you for your consideration of this request and I trust you can act on it favorably.
Ronald Eber - Edmonds
From: Donna Bond
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 7:41 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Streeteries — such a benefit to our community!
I just wanted to thank Edmonds for the streeteries/outside dining options during Covid. I feel that it
really increases the community spirit in downtown Edmonds, I have actually visited downtown Edmonds
more during the pandemic than before because of these safe dining options. Last week, after a business
lunch outside, I window shopped for furniture, bought some toys at the toy store, and bought some
Christmas gifts at the Kitchen store. All places I would not have otherwise visited on that day. I think
these dining options are a real draw.
Thank you so much for your compassionate consideration for our community.
From: Paine, Susan <Susan.Paine@edmondswa.gov>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 5:42 PM
To: Ron Eber; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Re: Public Comment on Marsh Restoration
Mr. Eber,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 28
Packet Pg. 103
8.3.a
As I mentioned in our earlier email exchanges, the 2022-2027 CP/CFP is on our agenda for tomorrows
meeting. I'm sure there will be a couple of motions to amend the item that pertains to the Edmonds
Marsh. Once this is approved, the final version will be sent to the State Department of Commerce.
The City is underway with the Waterfront Study which is doing a stakeholders' analysis (Phase 1 - my
wording) and that information will be wrapped up by the end of the 1st quarter 2022. This study will be
used to inform the Council on how we will put together what we want to propose for the actual Comp
Plan changes. The next phase will to engage our residents on the proposed Comp Plan changes, asking
for their feedback, and so forth.
I do think that you may be using the term "docketing" in a manner that isn't applicable for this year
Council did not make any changes to the Comp Plan so there is nothing on the docket to forward to
update the GMA.
If the consultant has produced any drafts, I am unaware of what has been included. The Comp Plan
process includes a lot of steps and Edmonds has always relied on the services of consultants for our big
Comp Plan changes. If we are going to go into the Comp Plan, we have the responsibility to do so by
using good engagement and outreach practices. I'm sure that as a planning professional, you would
agree that the community needs to be aware of what changes are being made.
Council asked for and funded this work to be done, it is my hope that once this first phase is completed,
we will be able to give the Director of Development Service some clear direction on how we want to
proceed.
I hope this answers many of your questions,
Susan
Susan Paine, (she/her) M.P.A.
Council President
Edmonds City Council, position 6
425-361-8844
From: Ron Eber
Sent: Monday, December 13, 20214:08 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: joe scordino
Subject: Public Comment on Marsh Restoration
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 29
Packet Pg. 104
8.3.a
Dear Council:
Since coming to Edmonds I keep hearing how much everyone wants to restoration the marsh and
establish a wildlife sanctuary. However, nothing seems to get done.
During the summer, I heard that the Council had approved as part of the 2021 City Budget a proposal to
develop an amendment to the City's comprehensive plan. The primary task for the amendment was to
delete provisions for the now defunct Edmonds Crossing, establish a clear goal for the restoration of the
Edmonds Marsh and address other related issues on the waterfront. However, Development Services
put this off and it is now not scheduled until 2024.
The current work being done by a consultant for the City will only produce an outline of the future work
needed for this and it will not provide a concrete draft of amendments ready for review in 2022. This is
unacceptable and a waste of time and money as preparing such an outline for such work is a very simple
thing to do ( As a retired land use planner with over 30 years of experience, I can attest to this).
I and many others have testified during this Fall's Budget process on the need for such an amendment
before further work or funding for storm water projects related to Marsh Restoration are approved.
Continuing down this path is a major mistake and a waste of money.
In November, I was informed by Council President Paine that the Council would "docket" an amendment
to the CIP/CFP at tonight's meeting. However, all I see is an adoption of these plans tonight and not a
"docketing" for adoption in 2022. 1 was further told that a possible amendment to the comprehensive
plan cannot be "docketed" or scheduled for 2022 until there is a draft prepared but then the draft
cannot be prepared until the possible amendment is "docketed." So around and around it goes.
My continued request is for the Council to "docket" or schedule for 2022 an amendment to the
comprehensive plan to delete provisions for the now defunct Edmonds Crossing and establish a clear
goal for the restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. The exact details for these amendments are not need
or required now but only the broad description is needed.
Further, I am in full accord with the letter you received today from Joe Scordino on behalf of Save Our
Marsh and urge you to quit budgeting money for Marsh restoration until there is a plan develop for
how this work will be accomplished.
Thank you for considering my comments and request.
Ronald Eber
Edmonds
From: Kathy Brewer
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 3:00 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; LaFave,
Carolyn <Carolyn.LaFave@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Please allow streateries to sunset.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 30
Packet Pg. 105
8.3.a
Hello Council Members and Mayor Nelson,
The streateries have been on public property long enough. They were allowed as a temporary,
emergency measure. After 1.5 years, it is no longer temporary or an emergency. The need is over.
Restaurants have been at 100% for six months. Anyone who would like to eat outside has numerous
restaurant options with outdoor dining downtown and elsewhere in Edmonds, including the restaurants
with the streateries. Most of them had existing outdoor dining in front of their restaurants and/or
behind them before streateries were permitted and those areas are still open. The streateries simply
allowed these restaurants to expand onto public property and increase profit at public expense. This is
wrong and unfair.
If we continue with the streateries, we may lose our other businesses. With limited parking, blocked
storefronts and sidewalk encroachment, customers and clients will stop coming. Some of us residents
no longer go downtown because of the inconvenience and unsightliness of the streateries. It's quicker
to drive to other shopping areas and not deal with the hassle. Seems like the only reason people come
downtown now is to eat. If we want to be a restaurant destination and that's all, then fine; but it's not
in our best interest. Putting all of our eggs in the restaurant basket is not a wise decision. If we want to
keep our downtown healthy, balanced and diverse, we need to be fair to all and remove the
streateries.
I've heard some people suggest allowing the streateries for a fee to the restaurants. This is not a
solution. The sidewalks and streets belong to the citizens. They are a public right -away and we have the
right to use them.
Please do the right thing and allow the streateries to sunset as scheduled.
Sincerely,
Kathy Brewer
From: Stephanie Westling
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Westling Public Comment
Hello Council and Mayor,
My family and I visited the downtown area of Edmonds several times this weekend. The city was busy
and the holiday cheer seemed to extend from the tiniest members of our community to the oldest. I was
reminded why my family and I choose to plant roots in this community. We are all so lucky and
fortunate to live where we do.
On Friday, we celebrated my daughter losing a tooth with dinner out. It was her choice and she had her
heart set on Taki Tiki. It was cold and wet but we bundled up and enjoyed a wonderful meal together in
one of the outdoor booths.
When the weather cleared on Saturday, we strolled through the outdoor market while enjoying a bag of
warm doughnuts. We picked up some meat, gawked at the beautiful jewelry, and attempted to walk
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 31
Packet Pg. 106
8.3.a
through the toy store. The line was several people deep on Main Street. We waved at the trolley and
headed home.
On Sunday, we returned to downtown and were able to make purchases at Teri's Toy Box, The Papery,
and Crow. All stores were full of shoppers despite the weather. Afterwards, we celebrated our finds
with a quick beverage and fries at Salish. We bundled up and toasted the weekend under one of their
canopies.
Tonight I get to extend my downtown Edmonds streak with a long-awaited visit with friends at Fire and
the Feast. Their cozy outdoor space provides the perfect setting to catch up without the worry of covid.
Needless to say, there is so much to celebrate in our community. We have wonderful restaurants and
retail locations in an ideal setting. I feel like we've lost sight of that. My family and I support the outdoor
dining options and the opportunities it has provided for us to continue to support our favorite dining
establishments.
The youngest in our community are still at risk. This pandemic is not over. I support the efforts of a task
force to review our approach and make adjustments where needed. Together, we can find a solution
but it will require patience, discussion, and understanding.
I hope we are able to work together to make that happen.
Cheers,
Stephanie Westling
ps. attached is a picture of myself, my husband, and our youngest (age 4) at Salish.
From: joe scordino
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:39 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Feser, Angie <Angie.Feser@edmondswa.gov>; Save Our Marsh
<save.the.edmonds.marsh@gmail.com>
Subject: Restoring the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary and the CFP/CIP
Council members:
As you know, restoring the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary, a City -owned regional treasure, is and will continue
to be a very complicated process that by necessity will involve numerous public and private entities, and
concerted and coordinated planning and implementation efforts.
The Council should not be further complicating the restoration effort by adopting planning documents —
the CFP/CIP — that place the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary under "Stormwater" AND "Parks" especially since
the management of the Marsh -Estuary to date as a storm basin with a tide gate closing -off daily tidal
exchange is a root cause of the deterioration of the Marsh.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 32
Packet Pg. 107
8.3.a
Please delete page 73 in the Public Works CFP/CIP so that City planning and management of this 'wildlife
reserve' (the Edmonds Marsh) is clearly the responsibility of the Parks Department with a restoration
priority for the City to have a functional ecosystem that wildlife and people can enjoy (very clearly a
Parks Dept. responsibility). Like all other City Parks, there obviously are components of Park
management that will involve City stormwater staff input and expertise — but that does not by necessity
require a separate CFP/CIP for the Public Works Department.
Because of this confusion on City priorities and responsibility, citizens have had to strike -out out on their
own to negotiate with other entities to plan and implement important restoration actions at the
Edmonds Marsh -Estuary (e.g., the successful community volunteer effort with WSDOT to restore
freshwater circulation into the Marsh; citizen's work with the County to treat the spread of invasive
plants in the interior Marsh; citizen's work with WDFW (see linked article below) to rear salmon fry to
repopulate the Marsh basin salmon runs; and, citizen engagement with WSDOT and DOE on the old
Unocal property). This "confusion" on Marsh restoration is exemplified by the City still using the
misnomer of "Willow Creek Daylighting" when Willow Creek (which drains into the southeast corner of
the Marsh) is already 'daylighted' — the restoration 'daylighting' is for a tidal channel between the
Marsh and Puget Sound that is currently in a 1,600-foot pipe.
The City should be working with the community to engage local knowledge and the huge community
support and volunteers. But that hasn't happened due to the confused City priorities (i.e., manage
Marsh as a storm basin verses a wildlife reserve). The City has wasted enough money hiring stormwater
contractors and others, who obviously have no idea of ecosystem requirements for buffers or interior
Marsh needs, to develop overly expensive (and inappropriate) Marsh restoration plans ($17M+). With
proper focus and planning, the City should have no problem obtaining State and Federal grant funding
that minimize the burden on City funding since salmon and nearshore restoration are national and
regional grant program priorities.
Please take the first step forward by fixing the CFP/CIP to confirm the Parks Department will be solely
responsible for managing this City's wildlife reserve (the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary) including restoration
(just as it is for all other City Parks) - delete page 73 of the Public Works CFP/CIP. The next step, which
can be taken up next year, is for the City to appoint a citizen's Advisory Committee for the Preservation
and Enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary and the City's Marsh Restoration Fund to assist the
Parks Department Director in managing this City treasure.
Students pitch in to ensure healthy salmon runs in local streams
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 33
Packet Pg. 108
8.3.a
streams
Saturday morning saw an estimated 50 students, teachers,
advisors and local salmon boosters (all part of the Edm...
From: Dawn Parker
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 20213:46 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Keep the streeteries
Hello,
I just want the council to know how much my family loves the streeteries. They have enhanced our town
and have allowed us to be outside during these trying times. Thank you for being so proactive and
helping out the businesses in our lovely town.
Please KEEP THE STREETERIES!
Dawn Parker
Edmonds, WA
Resident since 1961
From: Kclarke5
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:13 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Council
<Council@edmondswa.gov>; LaFave, Carolyn <Carolyn.LaFave@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Let "Emergency Ordinance 4209" sunset. End the painful political Kabuki Theater!
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Councilmembers,
You have the power to end this painful to watch political Kabuki Theater now playing on the Edmonds
stage.
Stop the play!
No more city council votes in 2021 need to be taken! Not even for "Emergency Ordinance 4209" that
created the Streateries. The State of Washington COVID-19 restrictions imposed on many businesses,
including restaurants, were lifted on June 30, 2021. Since July 1, 2021, all restaurants and bars have
been able to operate at 100% pre-COVID-19 capacities. In addition, the Streaterie permit holders have
had 6 months to prepare for the sun setting (December 31, 2021) of "Emergency Ordinance 4209".
"Emergency Ordinance 4209" sunsets December 31,2021. There is no evidence in the public records
(letters to city councilmembers or testimony at the public hearing) supporting or documenting any need
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 34
Packet Pg. 109
8.3.a
to extend "Emergency Ordinance 4209"; to reduce economic hardship created by any current
government COVID-19 restrictions. None!! The "Emergency" is over! Moreover, the record supports
observations of limited Streaterie use. The lack of government restrictions on indoor -outdoor -patio -
deck -sidewalk dining, and the cold, wet winter weather may be contributing factors reducing the
current market demand for Streateries. Near -term prospects, January thru June 2022, are for more of
the same ---limited demand and use of the Streateries, no government restrictions on restaurant dining
and cold, wet winter and early spring weather.
Voting on extending "Emergency Ordinance 4209," that created the Streateries, will only add fuel to,
and fan the flames of, an existing political wildfire that has already scorched the civic landscape of our
beautiful city. Let "Emergency Ordinance 4209" sunset! Do not needlessly poison the well for those
seeking future opportunities to dialogue on the Streateries issues.
In closing, let us move forward together, creating "An Edmonds Kind of Day" never ending story;
beautiful from sunrise to sunset; and respecting the interests of all our stakeholders. Let us: listen to
each other; separate people from the problems; focus on interests rather than positions; generate a
variety of options before settling on an agreement; and insisting the process be based on objective
criteria--- see Getting to Yes by Roger Fisher and William Ury.
Thank you for your public service. May you enjoy a memorable Holiday Season. May 2022, following a
brief intermission between acts in the public political play, bring the next act tying up loose ends and
resolving the unneeded and unwanted drama, moving toward ... and they lived happily ever after.
I have lived in Edmonds for over 60 years. I have enjoyed raising my family in the city and seeing most of
my grandchildren live, go to school, and enjoy the bounties of our beautiful city. Finally, I have had the
pleasure and honor to coach little league sports, help build the community and serve the City of
Edmonds in three public capacities: 4 years as chairperson of the first City of Edmonds Citizens
Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials; 5 years on the City of Edmonds Planning Board; and,
as an Interim Advisory Board Member, Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District (EDBID).
Respectfully submitted by,
Kevin B. Clarke
(206) 542-9503
Edmonds, WA
From: Eric Main
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 9:59 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
Just writing to let you know how much we enjoy the outdoor seating in Edmonds. We come here from
Kirkland specifically to dine because it is the one city that has a safe effective outdoor seating that is
covid safe.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 35
Packet Pg. 110
8.3.a
Please keep this in place. It is great. We are hoping other cities will follow suit, but until then you get all
our business.
Eric Main
From: Anne Garay
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 9:01 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: please keep Edmonds Streateries
I really like the Outdoor Streateries in downtown Edmonds.
Since the start of the pandemic I have chosen to eat outside rather than inside at Edmonds restaurants
about 90% of the time.
I think they add to the downtown vibe... and I hope they might be permanent.
Anne Garay
Edmonds 98026 resident
From: joe scordino
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 20219:52 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Ken Reidy; Taraday, Jeff <jeff@lighthouselawgroup.com>
Subject: Re: Formal request to investigate the conduct of Mayor Mike Nelson and Council President
Susan Paine prior to and during the November 16th Regular Meeting of the Edmonds City Council
City Council members;
There are three additional critical points to Mr. Ken Reidy's comments on the public being misled and
prevented from providing input to the Council's deliberations on adoption of the 2022 budget.
1. During Mayor Nelson's opening instructions to the public on the audience comment agenda item on
the Council's November 16, 2021 Public Meeting, he said "If you are here for any other matter besides
the budget this is the opportunity to speak during the audience comment".
The Mayor's instruction was clear that public comment on the budget would be allowed ONLY
during the budget agenda item regardless of whether the speaker had commented at a prior public
hearing or not.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 36
Packet Pg. 111
8.3.a
2. Although the Council President said "people who have already chimed in and participated last week in
the public hearing that their comments be considered part of the public record," the fact of the matter is
the minutes of the November 9, 2021 public hearing and the public's written comments that are
attached to the end of the minutes WERE NOT in the agenda packet for the November 16 meeting.
Thus the written and oral public comments were NOT yet part of the public record in front of the
Council for its deliberations on the 2022 budget nor available to the public.
3. Council President Paine in clarifying her motion to ban further public comments (including public
comments that had not been made before) said "if we've already heard from anyone from past two
weeks, we'd like to have others...." The clarified motion went way beyond just limiting those who
already made comments at the November 9 public hearing (i.e., the contradicted assumption that this
was a continuation of the prior public hearing).
The 'clarified' motion was understood by the public to apply to those who had provided written
comments on the budget as well as those who spoke during audience comments about the budget in
the past two weeks regardless of whether they spoke at the November 9 public hearing or not.
Also, although the CFP/CIP was a separate agenda item at the November 16 meeting, it is an adjunct
to the budget, thus some citizens understood the Mayor's instructions to wait until the budget agenda
item to comment on that as it related to the 2022 budget. But, then the Council President's clarified
motion during the budget agenda item was understood to also apply to those who commented on the
CFP/CIP (written or oral) in the past two weeks so they too were banned from providing further public
input by the Mayor's and Council President's actions.
The actions of the Mayor and Council President were an obfuscated, if not overt, effort to prevent public
input on the Council's deliberations on adoption of the 2022 budget. This needs to be remedied by the
Council.
On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 07:30:53 AM PST, Ken Reidy <kenreidy@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear City Council (others blind cc'd),
On November 8, 2021, somebody posted an Edmonds City Council "Notice of Filing of Preliminary 2022
Budget & Public Hearings" on the front door of City Hall.
The Notice stated the following even though the Edmonds City Council or a committee thereof had not
scheduled hearings on the budget or parts thereof as required by RCW 35A.33.055:
PUBLIC HEARINGS to consider citizens' comments regarding the Proposed 2022 Budget, Proposed 2022
Property Tax Levy, and Capital Improvement Program/Capital Facilities Plan (CIP/CFP Plans) will be held
on November 1, 2021. A second public hearing will be held on the Proposed 2022 Budget on November
9, 2021.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 37
Packet Pg. 112
8.3.a
As I emailed yesterday, the City Council President is not the legislative body. I hope all understand this
basic concept.
If scheduling hearings on the budget is something City Council President Susan Paine has the authority
to do all on her own, why did she make a motion during the November 9, 2021 Special Meeting of City
Council to continue the Public Hearing to November 16, 2021? Why didn't she just schedule the
November 16, 2021 hearing all on her own?
Again, the City Council President is not the legislative body.
Council President Susan Paine pointed out during the November 9, 2021 Special Meeting of City Council
that extending the public hearing would be a third opportunity for the public to comment on the
budget.
The Notice posted on the front door of City Hall on November 8, 2021, clearly notified the public of the
following:
"All interested persons are encouraged to attend and provide oral and/or written comments at any of
the hearings."
Words are important. Words such as "All" and "any".
Under the Governor's proclamation, Edmonds City government must provide the ability for all persons
attending the meeting to hear each other at the same time. Edmonds Mayor Mike Nelson controls the
ability for all persons attending the meeting to hear each other at the same time.
Not all the interested persons who attended the November 16, 2021 Public Hearing were allowed to
provide oral comments. Mayor Mike Nelson refused to take the action necessary to allow certain
people to provide oral comments via the Zoom Platform.
Why was Mayor Mike Nelson emailed the attached list of citizen names at 3:56 pm on November 16,
2021?
Did Mayor Mike Nelson know ahead of time that the following was going to take place hours after
3:56 pm on November 16, 2021?:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEYMONILLAS, TO PROPOSE
TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THIS IS A CONTINUANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING, IF THERE ARE PEOPLE
WHO ALREADY CHIMED IN AND PARTICIPATED LAST WEEK IN THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT THEIR
COMMENTS BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE RECORD AND THAT WE ENTERTAIN HAVING ONLY NEW
SPEAKERS TO THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING OUR BUDGET BE CONSIDERED TONIGHT.
What on earth does CHIMED IN mean? Does CHIMED IN include both oral and/or written comments?
How many citizens who had provided written comments LAST WEEK were impacted by this bizarre
Motion? Why wasn't the bizarre Motion ruled out of order because of these words included in the
public notice:
"All interested persons are encouraged to attend and provide oral and/or written comments at any of
the hearings."
When the November 16, 2021 City Council Meeting agenda was released on November 13, 2021, it did
not inform the public that those who had spoken previously would not be allowed to speak again.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 38
Packet Pg. 113
8.3.a
As the November 16, 2021 third opportunity for the public to comment on the budget drew near,
members of the public spent time thinking about and/or preparing public comments to make during a
Public Hearing. The public was unaware that Mayor Mike Nelson was emailed the attached list of citizen
names at 3:56 pm on November 16, 2021. The public had every right to believe that what the Public
Notice had stated was true:
"All interested persons are encouraged to attend and provide oral and/or written comments at any of
the hearings."
Please consider this a formal request to investigate the conduct of Mayor Mike Nelson and Council
President Susan Paine prior to and during the November 16t" Regular Meeting of the Edmonds City
Council. Please form a citizen task force to conduct this investigation and to recommend the appropriate
action for the City to take to address the conduct of Mayor Mike Nelson and Council President Susan
Paine prior to and during the November 16t" Regular Meeting of the Edmonds City Council. Please have
the citizen task force interview all citizens mentioned in the attached email sent Mayor Mike Nelson at
3:56 pm on November 16, 2021 by City Clerk Scott Passey. Please have the citizen task force interview
City Clerk Scott Passey to find out why he emailed Mayor Mike Nelson the attached email at 3:56 pm on
November 16, 2021.
Please form this citizen task force as soon as possible.
I believe these are serious issues. I hope Edmonds City Government will also contact the State Attorney
General and request legal review of all these issues.
Thank you.
Ken Reidy
From: Ken Reidy
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:26 AM
To: Council@edmondswa.gov <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Judge, Maureen
<Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Jeff Taraday <ieff@lighthouselawgroup.com>; Passey, Scott <scott.passey@edmondswa.gov>;
susan.mclaughlin@edmonds.wa.gov<susan.mclaughlin@edmonds.wa.gov>; Doherty, Patrick
<patrick.doherty@edmondswa.gov>; mike.nelson@edmondswa.gov <mike.nelson @edmondswa.gov>;
Carolyn LaFave <carolyn.lafave@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Reminder - Code of Conduct
Watching City Council conduct last night, I think it appropriate to remind City Council that, on January
26, 2021, City Council adopted a Code of Conduct via Motion.
Also, why all the discussion last night about the Extended Agenda being a Planning Tool? Why would
that matter?
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 39
Packet Pg. 114
8.3.a
RCW 35A.33.055 is a STATUTE that applies to the City of Edmonds. RCW 35A.33.055 concludes as
follows:
Prior to the final hearing on the budget, the legislative body or a committee thereof, shall schedule
hearings on the budget or parts thereof, and may require the presence of department heads to give
information regarding estimates and programs.
The City Council President is not the legislative body. I hope all understand this basic concept.
Edmonds City Council or a committee thereof did not schedule hearings on the budget or parts thereof.
End of story. RCW 35A.33.055, a STATUTE, was not complied with.
In addition to that, the Budget Schedule was modified after it was publicly noticed. City Council did not
vote to modify the budget schedule.
Your Code of Conduct includes:
Section 6. Council Code of Conduct
The City Council finds that Councilmembers should seek to continually improve the quality of public
service and ensure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective, transparent,
and equitable operation.
Councilmembers have a public stage and privileged platform to show how individuals with contrasting
points of view can find common ground, demonstrate problem -solving approaches, and achieve
solutions that benefit the community as a whole.
Central to these principles is that civility and decorum shall apply to all Councilmember conduct in
relation to city business.
To this end, the following Code of Conduct for members of the Edmonds City Council is established:
6.1 General Conduct
A. Councilmembers shall focus discussions and debates on vision, policies, and their implementation.
B. No Councilmember shall dominate proceedings during Council or other public meetings.
C. Personal, insulting, or intimidating language, body language and actions, are not allowed.
Councilmembers may raise a point of order for ruling by the Chair or by the Body to address
inappropriate remarks.
D. Ensuring that all meeting participants feel welcome is a vital part of the democratic process. No
signs of partiality, prejudice, or disrespect should be evident on the part of Councilmembers toward any
individual participating in a public meeting. Every effort should be made to be respectful in listening to
Council, staff and public testimony and discussions.
E. Technology allows words written or said to be distributed far and wide. Councilmember written
notes, voicemail messages, texts, email, or other electronic communications, are public records and
shall follow this code.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 40
Packet Pg. 115
8.3.a
Ken Reidy
Attachment:
From: Nelson, Michael
To: Passer, Scott
Subject: Re: public hearing speakers
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 4:21:38 PM
Thank you!!!
On Nov 16, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Passey, Scott <Scott.Passey@edmondswa.gov> wrote:
Mike,
Below is the list of speakers from the two budget hearings.
November 1 Patrick Hepler
Kim Bayer-Augustavo Ken
Reidy
Jim Ogonowski Carl Zapora
November 9 Ken Reidy
Natalie Seitz Finis Tupper
Cheryl Farrish Jim
Ogonowski Carolyn Strong
Deborah Arthur
Rebecca Anderson George
Bennett
Beth Fleming
From: Kathy Brewer
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:23 AM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Doherty,
Patrick <Patrick.Doherty@edmondswa.gov>; LaFave, Carolyn <Carolyn.LaFave@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Please remove the streateries and return our public sidewalks and streets.
To Council Members and Mayor Nelson,
I was unable to speak at last night's council meeting so here are my prepared comments for the
streateries' public hearing for public record.
First, I would like to say I am in full support of our public sidewalks and streets and you should be too!
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 41
Packet Pg. 116
8.3.a
Hello, This is Kathy Brewer, Edmonds resident. I would like to address the Council, Mayor and restaurant
owners of the streateries.
It is the holidays, a time of gratitude and goodwill. It is a time to be thankful and give back what we have
received. The restaurant owners were given a generous gift by the City a year and a half ago -- the right
to take over public property TEMPORARILY to extend their dining space outside to help them financially
through the worst of Covid. After six months, the streateries were granted a one year extension. Dining
tents became large, bulky, wood and plastic structures, and tables and chairs on sidewalks appeared to
multiply. We lost our parking and our sidewalks shrunk. We have been forced to walk through narrow
passageways through restaurants and bars just to walk through town.
It's cold and rainy and many streateries just sit empty, taking up space for no reason. With the dreary
weather the structures add to the gloom and block the charming storefronts, holiday decorations and
water, mountain and ferry views, which we all love about Edmonds. Most people have been vaccinated
and choose to dine inside. Others who still want to eat outdoors have many restaurant options in town
that offer it on their own property. The owners pay a lot of money to lease the property and pay taxes
on it. Many chose their locations because of the ability to offer outdoor dining and pay a premium for it.
Please support these restaurants.
Finally the year is up and the streateries are scheduled to sunset on December 31st. The restaurants
have recovered and are prospering nicely. They have received hundreds of thousands of dollars in PPP
and City, County and State grants. I know of one restaurant that has received over one million dollars.
With all this help, some owners have gone on to open new restaurants in Edmonds and elsewhere.
Good for them! But do they need to continue occupying our public property? I don't think so.
Nevertheless, the restaurant owners and their supporters are now asking for yet another extension, and
Council will be voting on whether to extend again or not. I say enough is enough. When will it stop?
Residents and other business owners have shown kindness and support for the restaurants, but many
people are losing their patience. Some are choosing not to go downtown or support these restaurants
any longer because they are tired of the streateries.
Of course, there are people that want them to remain but they must keep in mind that these structures
cannot go on and on sitting on public property. This is not fair. The property belongs to all of us.
So I'm asking the restaurant owners and the City to do what's right — remove the streateries. This
holiday season, be thankful, show gratitude and goodwill. Give back. And give the best gift many
residents would like this year -- our Edmonds back!
Thank you,
Kathy Brewer
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 14, 2021
Page 42
Packet Pg. 117
8.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
12-16-2021 Draft Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 118
8.4.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
December 14, 2021
Adjourned until December 16, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council virtual online adjourned meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor
Nelson.
4. ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES
Development Services Director McLaughlin commented it was exciting to see this much engagement on
this issue and she appreciated the positive collaboration from the restaurants and businesses over the past
week. She reviewed:
• Background
o March 2020: The COVID-19 pandemic placed restrictions on indoor dining
o June - August 2020: After initial easing of restrictions in early summer, the Governor tightened
restrictions again in August 2020
o August 18, 2020: In response the City announced a temporary ad hoc program by Special
Event Permit, starting on August 18, 2020, to allow curbside dining structures, aka " streateries
o December 15, 2020 : As Winter approached, and in light of continuing waves of COVID-19
and its related restrictions, the City Council passed Ordinance 4209 as an emergency measure
to protect public health and safety and formalized the allowance of streateries on a temporary
basis through 12/31/21
• Permit Requirements
o Streatery permits required restaurant owners to provide:
■ Site plan (including ADA access and traffic barriers)
■ Dining plan (location of tables, chairs, heaters, etc.
■ Platform construction drawing
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 1
Packet Pg. 119
8.4.a
■ Elevation sketch
■ Certificate of Insurance (naming City of Edmonds as additional insured with minimum
$300,000 personal injury and $100,000 property damage)
o Permits cost $110, with a $30 renewal fee.
o A final inspection was conducted by Engineering, Building and Fire prior to occupancy
o Limited to 20 streatery permits.
■ Currently, there are 17 existing streateries
• Map of existing streateries identifying Wednesday Service
Existing Streateries
f 4
as
d`
SRs
a
3
a
1s
14�"'sr
1,
a ess
77 2 j
9 4 5 g
s
�
9 8 7
au w y
110
�, 11
12
13 s
I
Msplp st
• Streatery Fee Comnarison
8 1 Brunch/Lunch
y
�+ Lunch/Dinner
Dinner
Closed
C
1.The Busty Pelican
2,
Sarna Fe
3.The Loft
4, Leftcraft
5. Maize & Barley
6. Kelne o
7. Fire & Feast
B.Takl Tiki
9, Mar-Ket
10, Engel's Pub
11. Salish Sea Brewing
12. Las Brisas
13. Barkada
14, Chantrelles
15. Claires
I6, Sa6 & Iron
17, W phnes
Jurisdiction
Permit Fee
Bellevue
$436 ($238 plan review + $198 for inspection)
Langley
Waived. None established
Seattle
No fee: subsidized with ARPA money
Spokane
Annual license $100; modification to permitted plan
$250; application fee $50, review fee $300, parking
mitigation, metered $2.09/sf per month and time -
restricted free parking $1.05/sf per month
Anacortes
Waived. None established
Madison
Waived. None established
Los Angeles
Waived. None established
Auburn
Capital project no permit fee
Renton
Waived. None established
Everett
Waived. None established
Ellensburg
Waived. None established
Walla Walla
Fees waived during pilot period EOY 2023
Kennewick
$439
Wenatchee
$250
Bothell
Waived
Vancouver, WA
Waived
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 2
Packet Pg. 120
8.4.a
Shoreline
Waived
Kirkland
Waived
Bend, OR
Waived
Prosser
$250
Milwaukie, OR
—$500
Eugene, OR
Waived
Bellingham
$150 fora year
o Out of 24 cities that researched, 17 cities waived the fees
o The remaining cities charged flat fees that range between $150-500 with exception of Spokane
that factored in a paid parking mitigation when they made their ordinance permanent.
o Since Edmonds does not have paid parking, staff recommends a flat permit fee to cover staff
time for permit reviews and inspections
o Recent discussions have raised the possibility of a monthly charge ($500-750/month), which
would be over 25x the average permit fee
Streateries Ordinance 4209
o Streateries Ordinance 4209, approved by Council on 12/15/2020 was originally set to sunset as
of 12/31/21.
o City Council has the authority to extend the Ordinance into 2022
o The COVID-19 pandemic is not over, which is more apparent with Omicron variant. The
following language in Ordinance 4209 is still relevant:
■ "...this ordinance should be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health,
safety and welfare by staving off restaurant failures and creating program so that Edmonds
citizens will have safer places to dine for the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic."
Community Services & Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty reviewed:
• Public Survey
o Take-aways
■ Majority of public uses streateries
■ Majority of public will continue to use streateries if available in 2022
■ Majority of public believes streateries enhance Downtown Edmonds
■ Majority of public will visit Downtown less frequently or go elsewhere for eating/drinking
if streateries are discontinued
• Research
o Take-aways
■ Downtown merchants overall at 110% of pre -pandemic levels in Summer 2021
■ Random sample of Main Street retailers show vast majority at 100% or higher of pre -
pandemic levels in Summer 2021
■ Restaurants attract frequent repeat visitors who shop, window shop, come back
■ Restaurants are largest component of the retail sector employing the most, buying the most
supplies/inventory, and having largest economic multiplier effect
Ms. McLaughlin reviewed:
• Draft ordinance
o Streateries will not be able to be extended beyond the expiration date of the new ordinance
(May 31, 2022):
■ This subsection C.6 shall sunset on Deeember May 31, 2424 2022, tifAiess the off etive doe
is ehanged by aefien of the City Getineil.
■ Council may want to consider an alternative date than is currently in the draft ordinance
given that it is less than 6 months away.
o Streateries will be reinspected to ensure code compliance:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 3
Packet Pg. 121
8.4.a
■ A streatery shall be po.... iRe f a o a o f � e than o o -de that �
",
permit maybe extended in three to up to six month increments, PROVIDED THAT it passes
a final inspection for code compliance prior to the permit extension
Council President Paine asked if there had been any other applications or interest in installing new
streateries in the last six months. She wondered if 20 may too high and 17 may be enough. Mr. Doherty
said he has not heard of any requests.
Councilmember Olson referred to the takeaways from the survey that a majority had used streateries,
pointing out the way that question was asked, it was not scope or time limited so it was during the good
weather. The weather is bad now and in her repeated attempts to observe people using the streateries, she
did not find that was the case. With regard to the survey question that stated a majority, 52%, would go
elsewhere if the streateries were discontinued, there needs to be an acknowledge that the way that question
was asked did not give respondents the option of choosing other outdoor dining in Edmonds. It was either
I'm going to eat inside a restaurant in Edmonds or I'm going somewhere else that has outdoor dining; there
was no option for outdoor dining in Edmonds. Mr. Doherty responded there were three answers for that
question, if there are no streateries, what is the best characterization of your anticipated habits for the first
six months of 2022? The first answer was, I will continue to come downtown choosing to eat indoors which
48.5% chose. The second answer was, I will come to downtown less frequently as I am less comfortable
eating indoors which covers two scenarios, someone will come less frequently because they are concerned
about having fewer options or that they will come downtown to the 5-6 establishments that have outdoor
dining that are not streateries but that in total is fewer restaurants to choose from because there are about
25 or so restaurants downtown.
Mr. Doherty continued, the third answer was, I will choose to go elsewhere. Adding the first two, I will
come downtown less frequently or I will choose to elsewhere, the total is 52%. That was an important figure
because, although not science, it indicates roughly half the people in the market are concerned enough about
the continued existence of the pandemic that they will change their habits, they will choose to come less
frequently or go somewhere else which means fewer people coming downtown which has a multiplier effect
across all businesses. He concluded it is obviously not science, but it is a pretty good survey with 4100
respondents.
Councilmember Olson said she created a list of all the outdoor dining options, and there are about 20, not
5-6. She will read the list later in the meeting.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented it is the holidays so she doubted people would stop coming out
even without the streateries. She relayed hearing that people could take the survey multiple times from
different devices; for example she has seven devices and could have taken the survey from each one. She
asked if there was any verification done to ensure only one household answered the survey. Mr. Doherty
said Survey Monkey has a default to try to get around that, but if someone really wanted to, they could
figure out a way to get around that by using a different computer, etc. Given that there were 4100
respondents, even if a small percentage were devious enough to the trick system, he did not think it was a
substantial number as most people would not do it. In researching that issue, Survey Monkey indicated
there is an extremely low rate of that occurring because people are either not savvy enough to do it or do
not care enough to try to trick the system.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented she was not that savvy. She relayed her understanding that only
two of the streateries were in compliance with the regulations. Ms. McLaughlin answered all passed final
inspection with the exception of two; however, staff responds on a complaint basis and there has not been
an inventory of complaints where further inspections have been done. The Fire Department has gone out
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 4
Packet Pg. 122
8.4.a
multiple times, but there has not been a comprehensive re -inspection of the streateries as that is not typical
in the City's permit process.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed another question she heard was some of the restaurants have closed
their streateries but they have not been taken down or they are only open Wednesday to Sunday or shortened
hours. She asked why there weren't more restrictions included in the new ordinance. Ms. McLaughlin
advised the existing Ordinance 4209 states if the streatery is inactive for a certain number of days, the
permit may be terminated. Councilmember Buckshnis observed that has not been enforced. Ms.
McLaughlin answered if a complaint was received and staff determined it had been over a 15 day period,
there would be a response but that has not happened yet. Councilmember Buckshnis summarized a
complaint has to occur before staff checks into it. Ms. McLaughlin agreed.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was out last weekend and at lunchtime and dinner she found most
of the covered tables filled with people. She was not sure when Councilmember Olson's observations had
occurred, but at lunchtime after the holiday market and in the evening at about 6:30, many people were
sitting outside. She has been checking on this herself to see what is going on and she is finding something
totally different than Councilmember Olson found regarding folks sitting outside. The only issue she has
with the streateries is ensuring people have space to walk on sidewalks. As an advocates for people with
disabilities, she wanted to ensure there was enough space and that businesses were not moving tables and
chairs onto the sidewalks. There needs to be enough room for people using a wheelchair or walker or for
someone who is visually impaired to use the sidewalks. She has found the tables and chairs get spread out
over time.
Ms. McLaughlin said the engineering team went out due to complaints in the past week and verified the 5-
foot clearance required by code. She agreed there could be instance where an A -frame sign can be placed
or moved or a chair not returned to the right place. She agree it is an issue with protecting that 5-foot
clearance. The footings are less of an issue than mobile objects like A -frame and chairs that are placed in
the 5-foot clear zone. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed those can be an issue and is not the fault of
the business owners but the employees who are setting up.
Council President Paine said she has received close to 140 emails, 69 in favor and 37 against. A lot of the
emails describe personal experiences and some include photos of families enjoying the streateries as well
as photos of compliance issues. She inquired about the experiences in cities outside Edmonds. Mr. Doherty
said he did some initial research about fees in other cities and then Ms. McLaughlin and her staff went
further. He has the ability to query all the Economic Developers in Snohomish County via a listserv; other
cities that have had streateries have been successful. He noted the emails track well with the survey
responses.
Mr. Doherty continued, in another city in the county that is about a year behind Edmonds; they did the
special event permit without an ordinance and pulled that within the last 5-6 weeks to write an ordinance.
A person from that city contacted him and said since they pulled the streateries by permits while they
developed an ordinance, the retailers have asked for them to come back because they lost business. He
recognized it is closer to holidays, the weather is worse etc. but the retailers in that city wanted the streateries
back because they believed it helped business. In the groups he has participated in, wherever streateries
have been allowed, people like them and use them. That doesn't mean they use them all the time such as
when it's raining and windy, but they will use them during nicer weather. It is an option for the percentage
of people who are still not comfortable indoors in crowded restaurants, particularly as the pandemic
unfortunately continues to rage. He did not have statistics from other cities, only antidotes from the
representatives.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 5
Packet Pg. 123
8.4.a
Council President Paine recalled a lot of emails said parents could bundle up their children and have a
family meal outside feeling safe and comfortable. The youngest of children do not yet have access to
vaccines and being safe is what many parents interested in doing. She found it interesting that the retailers
in the other city asked for the streateries to return when the streateries' permits were pulled to allow the city
to develop an ordinance. Mr. Doherty said the city allowed streateries without any standards and realized
an ordinance was necessary.
Ms. McLaughlin said staff researched over 25 cities throughout the country; the majority are still in the
pilot phase, but multiple cities, perhaps over 10 have now made streateries permanent including Spokane,
Anacortes, Madison, WI, Los Angeles, Wenatchee, Bend OR, Bellingham, Salem OR, Milwaukee OR, and
Medford OR. Many cities decided to allow streateries during the pandemic and it is interesting to see the
transition and adaptation to the future of outdoor dining. Council President Paine commented she was not
surprised by that because restaurants were the most dramatically impacted at the start of the pandemic,
particularly with the restrictions imposed in Washington where everything was shut down, followed by
reopening at a percentage. She summarized restaurants bring people to town.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she loved all the photos the Council has received from families and friend
groups especially those with young children sharing their experience dining in the streateries. She referred
to what she believed to be false information that the streateries are illegal which has been causing quite a
bit of hub-bub. Unfortunately in social media, misinformation spreads as fast almost as fast as COVID. She
offered staff an opportunity to set the record straight. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said most of comments he
has seen alleging that streateries are illegal address the fact that no public hearing was held on Ordinance
4209. He will speak to that and not to some of the compliance issues that have been raised recently because
that is not within his domain.
With respect to Ordinance 4209 and the process used to adopt it and the lack of public hearing, Mr. Taraday
reiterated some things he has told the Council before because possibly not all the public has heard it. He
was asked to prepare Ordinances 4209 and 4210 at basically the same time for the same Council meeting.
Things were moving fast and he made a mistake in drafting 4209; he copied and pasted language from
Ordinance 4210 into Ordinance 4209 which is why the phrase, interim zoning, appears in Ordinance 4209.
That mistake does not change the character of something that would not otherwise be a zoning ordinance
and turn it into a zoning ordinance. In other words, if he makes a mistake and calls something a zoning
ordinance, that is his mistake but it does not mean that ordinance is now a zoning ordinance. It is not a
zoning ordinance because streets are not zoned. There are at least three places in the City code that confirm
that streets not zoned; it is the property abutting streets that is zoned. Because Ordinance 4209 regulates the
use of streets and because streets are not zoned, it would not make sense to call Ordinance 4209 a zoning
ordinance. Had it not been for his error in drafting and cutting and pasting, no one would have ever thought
of it as a zoning ordinance.
Mr. Taraday explained that matters because under GMA, cities are required to have a public participation
process every time zoning and development regulation ordinances are adopted. That is one of the main
functions of the Planning Board; ordinances like that are sent to them for review to fulfill GMA's public
participation requirement. The Planning Board usually conducts those public hearings for the City Council
and sends a recommendation to the City Council that the City Council then acts on. The City Council is not
required to have public hearings on every ordinance it adopts. The Council can choose to have a public
hearing whenever it wants, but is only required to have public hearings when the law requires it. GMA is
the law that requires public hearings be held on development regulations and zoning ordinances. An issue
has to be in the realm of a development regulation or zoning ordinance to have a requirement for a public
hearing. This issue is not in that realm because streets not zoned and it is a regulation that affects public
property.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 6
Packet Pg. 124
8.4.a
Mr. Taraday explained the 60 day hearing requirement is also in the GMA and allows an exception to the
general rule that zoning ordinances need public hearing prior to adoption. The exception to the general rule
is that the Council can adopt an interim zoning ordinance which requires a public hearing within 60 days
after adoption, but that only applies to zoning ordinances. That is why, despite his drafting error, Ordinance
4209 has always been a legal ordinance. Whether the Council chooses to continue it as a policy matter is
entirely up to the City Council, but from a strictly legal standpoint, he never had any doubt that it was a
legally adopted and legally maintained ordinance.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Mr. Taraday for the clarification and for owing the mistake. She was
hopeful that explanation would put the false claim to bed.
Councilmember Chen relayed his understanding that the City was still in a pandemic but asked if it was
still an emergency situation. Mr. Doherty said yes, from the State level as the Governor has never lifted the
statewide emergency related to the pandemic. Councilmember Chen pointed out restaurant occupancy was
back to 100% a long time ago. Mr. Doherty agreed, although there are restrictions related to mask wearing
but occupancy is back to 100%. Because the State is still under the Governor's emergency, it is not
impossible that additional restrictions could be imposed if Omicron or other variant becomes a problem in
the coming months. That emergency power allows the Governor to do that with a snap of the fingers if he
wishes.
Councilmember Chen referred to the indication in the presentation that retail had performed well, up to
110% for most. He inquired about restaurants' performance. Mr. Doherty referred to the narrative in social
media that streateries were harming retailers. Some respondents to the survey stated they liked the
streateries but had heard they were hurting the retailers. That is the reason staff investigated how retailers
and businesses overall were doing which revealed it was a false narrative. There was not a prompt to
investigate how well restaurants were doing. Overall downtown businesses are at 110% percent of pre -
pandemic levels. A random sample of Main Street retailers, because most of the streateries are on Main
Street, 12 out of 17 were over 100%, 4 were at 90%-100% and 1 was below 90%. Generally, retailers as a
subset of all merchants are doing approximately as well as they were doing before the pandemic. If overall
merchants were doing 110%, restaurants were likely doing that well or possibly better but there was no
narrative to support or debunk that. He acknowledged that was not true for all restaurants but most were.
Councilmember Chen pointed out one of the survey questions was if the streateries are removed, will you
come downtown less frequently? If those people go elsewhere, he asked if there were streateries outside
downtown Edmonds. Mr. Doherty said there were three potential answers, 1) come downtown less
frequently which could means going to other outdoor dining options, 2) going out less frequently because
they were not comfortable, or 3) going elsewhere which could mean other parts of Edmonds or other cities.
There are no streateries in Edmonds outside of downtown because there is no other area with street parking
in front of retail; outdoor dining in other areas of the City are in parking lots or property adjacent to
restaurants. He summarized people could go other places in Edmonds with outdoor dining or to other
communities. The takeaway with all questions is if the streateries are taken away, it will likely have an
effect on business overall because fewer people or less frequently would dine in downtown Edmonds.
Councilmember Olson commented there are two issues, implementing something like streateries long term
or the emergency ordinance and she wanted to keep those two issues separate. She supported the City
vetting and considering all the equitable ways to bring more engagement to the City. Streateries may be an
answer to that, implemented in a way that considers all the stakeholders. Instead of continuing the process
which was a kneejerk reaction to an emergency that has had casualties, she was completely open to
considering something that provided more engagement, but wanted to keep that separate from the
emergency ordinance. She validated what Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said, noting the holiday market
was an exception to what she has seen during other times, it was much sunnier and warmer and a lot of
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 7
Packet Pg. 125
8.4.a
people were out. That was different than the other times she has been downtown which has been pretty
constant over the past 2-3 months.
Councilmember Olson referred to the 2-parking space maximum for streateries. She asked Mr. Taraday if
the sidewalks were covered by the zoning ordinance but streets were not as there is sidewalk dining in the
zoning ordinance. Mr. Taraday said sidewalks in the right-of-way are also not zoned. The Code section that
addresses sidewalk dining in the zoning code is not diapositive whether something is codified. In
Councilmember Olson's reference to 17.70.040 in the zoning code, bistro and outdoor dining, that section
does address sidewalks but it also addresses outdoor areas under the lease or ownership of the applicant
lying between the applicant' property and the public right-of-way. For that reason, this particular code
section regulates both public property sidewalks (sidewalks in the right-of-way) and outdoor dining areas
that are sidewalk adjacent but on private property. This was drafted in 2009 before he was the City Attorney;
it could have been divided, placing the right-of-way portion in Title 18 and the private property portion in
Title 17. He was not sure it mattered where it was codified but it did not change his conclusion that zoning
does not apply to the right-of-way.
Councilmember Olson referred to the requirement in the streatery code for a 2-space maximum,
commenting that would include the footings of the streatery. If one made the assertion that it doesn't, she
had comparables in other zoning enforcement that would seem like a contradiction if there were not that
same approach taken with the streateries. She asked for validation that compliance must be within the two
parking spaces and nothing related to the streatery can be located in the sidewalk. Mr. Taraday said most
of that question should be directed to Director McLaughlin. The Council has the authority with its
deliberations tonight to regulate the footings however it wishes. If the Council wanted to clarify its intent
that the footings are not on the sidewalk, it legally has the power to do that. It could be somewhat devastating
to the actual streatery owner because it would essentially be asking them to rebuild something that has only
4-5 months remaining in its life which may not be financially feasible.
Ms. McLaughlin pointed out the section of Ordinance 4209, 6.i.4, related to 2 vehicle parking spaces states
the maximum length of a streatery is 2 vehicle parking spaces. There is a separate statement in that section
that all streateries should be within the approved space and should not extend into the travel lane. The
interpretation is slightly gray but to her it meant the streatery should not encroach on the travel lane. One
statement refers to the length (maximum length of 2 parking spaces) and the other refers to the width in
relation to encroaching on the travel lane. With regard to the footings, she explained the sidewalk zone is
broken into three areas, 1) the furnishings zone (the first 2-3 feet from the curb face to the pedestrian clear
zone) where pedestrian lights, newspaper boxes, trash cans, etc. can be located, 2) the walking zone
typically 5-6 feet of clear space, and 3) a frontage zone where retailers may display goods. She summarized
it was appropriate that the footings were in the furnishings zone. Councilmember Olson did not agree with
that because the code states entirely within and there is nothing gray about that.
Councilmember Olson advised there are 28 restaurants in Edmonds that have non-streatery outdoor dining;
some of restaurants with streateries also have other outdoor dining. She read the list of restaurants: in back
of Church Key, Kelnero, Five Bistro, Demetris, Rory's, Salish Boathouse, Brigid's, Anthony's Beach Caf6,
at the side of SanKai, Fire & the Feast, Calypso, Kahlo's, Scott's Bar & Grill, Epulo, Bucatini, in front of
Las Brisas, Girardi's, Hamburger Harry's, MAR KET, Salish Sea, Caravan Kabob, Bistro 76, Santa Fe
Caf6 Salt and Iron, Anthony's, Arnie's, and Niles Peacock Kitchen and there may be more. She found it
misleading and false to say there was not a lot of outdoor dining. She has observed these outdoor dining
spaces as well as the streateries being empty. More than enough outdoor dining options are offered to meet
the COVID and flu safety that citizens are seeking. Therefore the temporary emergency ordinance should
be sunsetted as intended.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 8
Packet Pg. 126
8.4.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out most the outdoor dining spaces Councilmember Olson listed
have no roof so no one will sit there in the rain, snow or wind. She knew of a few places such as Amie's
that have a roof. She commented it was silly to bring up all those areas at this time of the year.
Councilmember Olson responded quite a few of them have roofs.
Councilmember L. Johnson commented the streateries are a temporary program in response to a global
pandemic, put in place to save restaurants. In this case necessity and ingenuity teamed up and the City has
been successful in keeping restaurants afloat and actually thriving during the pandemic. She found it
interesting that some seem angry or frustrated by the restaurants' success, and questioned whether they
would rather that businesses were struggling to prove the continued need for the streateries program versus
thriving and thereby proving the effectiveness of the program. Some have argued that streateries reduce
ADA access, which is not the case, but then dismiss those who prefer to or will only eat outdoors in order
to reduce their risk. Those people are told restaurants are at 100% now and if they do not want to eat inside,
they can take their food and eat in their car.
Councilmember L. Johnson acknowledged there were other places to dine outdoors, however, in her
experience, they are not necessarily set up with the same careful thought as the streateries which provide
more spacing than a traditional deck where tables may be closer together and not have the same airflow. A
lot of people have spoken to Council including testifying at the public hearing, emailing the Council, and
responding to the City's survey and the Beacon's survey and a majority support continuing the streateries.
If the streateries program ended now, the Council would be telling a large portion of residents and visitors
that they do not care to accommodate their needs. The pandemic is still here and with the emergence of
another highly transmittable variant and the holidays coming up, it was clear to her that these measures
needed to be kept in place to protect the public and economic health.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4243 EXTENDING THE EDMONDS
STREATERIES THROUGH JUNE 30, 2022.
Council President Paine appreciates what Councilmember L. Johnson said. She referred to comments made
during the public hearing where a lot of people said they enjoy the camaraderie, the aspect of seeing their
neighbors in a safe place, and in a place that was surprisingly welcoming. This is a whole new way for
Edmonds residents to engage with their neighbors, an Edmonds kind of streatery, walking around and
seeing your neighbors. She recalled one youngster saw his last year's teacher and another young man at the
public hearing said people are falling in love in streateries. The pandemic has been hard on everyone and it
was nice to hear that people of all ages were using the streateries, some more often than others. They are
being used and are another way for the community to connect with each other, something that has been
very difficult during the pandemic. The inability to socialize has made an enormous difference in how
people treat each other.
Council President Paine supported having the streateries continue for 5-6 months. She pointed out how
much better the streateries have been for all the businesses and felt ending the streateries during the holiday
season would be wildly unfair. The restaurants and retailers she has spoken with told her that they have
never been busier and they would like to have the streateries continue rather trying to decide what to do
next if the streateries have to be removed. She supported retaining the streateries for the economic and
public health aspects and for the community's health. The heart of the community is strength of everyone
who loves it. She will support the ordinance as presented.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she obviously hears from a lot from different constituents, many who
provided pictures. She acknowledged the streateries were being used but were not being used a lot. There
are a lot of outdoor dining facilities including parking lots that were turned into outdoor dining. She
suggested thinking outside the box such as forming a task force to consider pop-up restaurants that could
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 9
Packet Pg. 127
8.4.a
occur between Memorial Day and Labor Day with a theme such as maritime as opposed to these shacks.
She took some friends from Lithuania downtown and they sat outside where it was cold, the wind blow on
their feet and the tables were on cement. She supported taking a pragmatic approach, forming a task force
and involving the Economic Development Commission to consider pop-up restaurants in the spring and
summer. She referred to the public hearing where many people spoke including many who have not
contacted the Council in the past. She expressed support for sunsetting the streateries, giving them 10 days
to take them down, and establishing a task force to work on having pop-up restaurants in the spring/summer.
Councilmember Chen said when he first came to the United States he worked in a restaurant doing dishes
and cutting vegetables so he knew how hard working in a restaurant can be. He heard from many other
businesses that pedestrians and seniors have expressed a desire for more parking so they can come
downtown to spend money. While it is important to look at legalities and code enforcement, he
recommended stepping back and looking at the big picture. The streateries do help during the pandemic;
people wear masks when entering restaurants but remove them when eating and drinking with the entire
restaurant occupied. Businesses are doing well, which is great for the City and the collection of sales tax.
Taking all these factors into consideration, he offered an amendment to Councilmember L. Johnson's
motion.
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES THROUGH THE END OF
APRIL 2022 WITH A ONE-TIME APPLICATION FEE OF $4,000 WHICH IS $1,000 PER MONTH
AND STREATERY MUST COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF EXISTING CODE AND OTHER
APPLICABLE LAWS. FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT WISH TO APPLY FOR AN EXTENSION,
THEY HAVE UNTIL JANUARY 15 TO REMOVE THE STREATERY. THE FEES COLLECTED
WILL BE USED TO PAY FOR PAID PARKING AND MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC. WITH
THIS AMENDMENT, I LIKE TO HAVE A TASK FORCE LOOK AT LONG TERM SOLUTIONS
TO HAVE MORE ENGAGED STREETS IN DOWNTOWN EDMONDS.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said $4,000 was an absolutely ridiculous amount to put on restaurants in
Edmonds and to assume they could afford $4,000 which equates to wages for 2-3 staff/month. With regard
to the desire for more parking for seniors or those with disabilities, it was her understanding that none of
the streateries block disabled parking; handicapped parking spaces are still there. She found it appalling
that Councilmembers Olson, Buckshnis and Chen were opposed to downtown businesses and restaurants
and saying they do not think the downtown restaurants should be supported. She disagreed as the downtown
restaurants are what drive people to come to Edmonds; her friends who live in Seattle come to Edmonds to
eat. It is also ridiculous to suggest getting rid of outdoor dining and have people sit inside. There are very
few outdoor dining spaces that are covered. She understood there has been a lot of emails from business
owners making threats to Council regarding this issue, but those who support getting rid of the streateries
are opposing other businesses which is not the position the Council should take. She supported
Councilmember L. Johnson's motion to give the streateries six months and find out what needs to be done
during that time. Otherwise the Council is pitting one group against another which she found very
inappropriate.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED A SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO SUNSET THE
STREATERIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2021.
City Clerk Scott Passey said a substitute motion would compete with the original motion. If there is a second
for the substitute motion, it can be debated but the Council would debate and perfect Councilmember
Chen's amendment and once that is completed, the substitute motion would be perfected via amendment
and the Council would vote on which one was the main motion.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 10
Packet Pg. 128
8.4.a
Councilmember Olson said when the emergency ordinance was adopted, it had compromise built in. She
considered supporting a compromise but concluded that compromise had already happened when the
Council agreed to streateries and supporting the sunset supports compromise. Due to the upfront cost of
streateries, it was thought a full year needed to be allowed so restaurants and bars could recoup their
investment in the streatery. That full year has been provided, even with the 100% return to restaurant
capacity in the spring. It was not true that she was against the restaurants; but some restaurants find this an
unfair advantage because streateries get additional seating capacity for free while they are paying for their
outdoor capacity. Many retailers are commenting about the streateries including the Edmonds Theater. She
recalled while doorbelling when she asked what residents wanted to see preserved, the most common
response was the Edmonds Theater. The Edmonds Theater reports the streateries block their advertising for
the movies, they do not have the capacity in the theater, it is noisy inside from the streateries, etc.. She
concluded streateries are a negative for a lot of businesses, especially those adjacent to the streateries.
Councilmember Olson said there has been great camaraderie, support and willingness to give, but until this
is thought out more carefully and implemented in a way that is more conducive to all stakeholders, the
streateries should be sunsetted. She will support Councilmember Chen's amendment because it improves
on the initial motion because restaurants are offered an increased business opportunity. What has frustrated
a lot of citizens is that many of the streateries are not being used and should not be taking up the parking
spaces. She was originally more accepting of the streateries that are being well used but one of the ones
that is well used is causing a problem for the movie theater. She concluded sunsetting the streateries was
the most prudent option for downtown and returning to the issue of streateries with more thoughtful
consideration on how it is implemented in the future.
Councilmember L. Johnson said the streateries and the original extension was more than allowing
restaurants to recoup the cost of building the streatery. If that was the goal, what would be the point? This
is about continued survival and continuing a thriving economic driver and celebrating that it has been
successful. She questioned the rationale of ending something that is working. She did not support the
amendment as any fee should be justifiable and should not be extravagant, punitive, or pulled out of the air,
it needs to be based on something. It appears the motivation behind requiring the fee upfront is making it
so high that people cannot do it or possibly taking the risk and losing money. The proposed fee is above
what any other city is doing and seems punitive.
Council President Paine said a $4,000 application fee is outside the range of any other city and says that
Edmonds is not business friendly. She strongly supported having a fee that was defensible and had merit,
something the Development Services Department can establish. She objected to requiring the streateries to
be removed to discuss the program, concluding that was just playing with people's businesses. Ending the
streateries and then restarting the program seems very awkward and unthoughtful. There is already a
stakeholder group comprised of restaurateurs, retailers and merchants, who put developed a proposal.
Edmonds has a very successful downtown and although it has changed due to COVID, it maintains the
community. A stakeholder group should be comprised solely of business people. She worried with that high
a fee, Edmonds would become known as anti -business. People and the media are watching this issue and
she did not sure want to lead with a message of being anti -business. She did not support the $4,000
application fee because it was anti -business.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she consider most of this appalling and anyone who said they support
businesses but, is also appalling. The Downtown Edmonds Merchants Association (DEMA) offered a
compromise. But for whatever reason, some Councilmembers are listening to the same 20 people who send
them emails about danger and whatever. This is not business friendly; any Councilmember that supports
this amendment does not believe in businesses. She did not know a single business that could afford a $4000
permit to have outdoor dining space and found it simply ridiculous. She was not sure who had gotten to
Councilmember Chen but that is not appropriate for this town. Edmonds is a town made up of small, family
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 11
Packet Pg. 129
oriented businesses that "believe in moving Edmonds in an appropriate fashion." It is disingenuous and
appalling for Councilmembers to say they believe in Edmonds businesses but make it so they cannot afford
to do business.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed the media is watching. It is important for the Council to indicate it
is business agreeable, agree to a 6 months hold and during that 6 months, as Councilmember L. Johnson
said, look at the issues and move forward in a pragmatic way. In looking at what other cities, none of them
charge $4,000, they may charge $400. The 20-25 people who constantly email the Council are not
representative of the 42, 000 residents. The Council has received more texts and emails on this issue than
anything else. The Council needs to be supportive of businesses and restaurants should have the ability to
have the streateries. She agreed there needed to be some type of fee, but not $4,000 as many businesses live
on $4,000/month. She encouraged the Council to do the right thing for the people who live in Edmonds and
have businesses in Edmonds.
Councilmember K. Johnson clarified the $4,000 is fee for 4 months or $1,000 per month. The main issue
for her is that the streets and parking spaces are part of the public right-of-way. Restaurants have no standing
with regard to streateries; the City granted the use of two spaces per restaurant to support them at a time
when the Governor greatly restricted restaurant capacity and the City wanted a temporary ad hoc program
to protect public health. Things are now out of compliance, typically there are no traffic barriers and there
was originally no expectation that heaters would be used. She recalled about 10 years ago Mr. Brooks
encouraged the City to develop a concentration of new restaurants in the downtown area. Since then, the
City narrowed the street right-of-way on Main Street between 5' and 6' to create wider sidewalks and have
accommodated both sidewalk dining and patio dining. She estimated that 9 of the 17 restaurants with
streateries offer that alternative. In addition, many adjacent restaurants throughout Edmonds have patio and
outdoor dining some of which have umbrellas or other ways of protecting patrons from the rain.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she did not believe that the majority of people in Edmonds use the
streateries and certainly did not believe that they would be very popular during the cold winter months. The
17 streateries use 34 downtown parking spaces. Those streateries may be closed few hours of the day but
the parking spaces are occupied 24/7. She did not believe the City could find 34 parking spaces in private
lots as DEMA suggested. DEMA suggested $500-750/month to rent parking spaces when in fact they have
had free streatery space for nearly 1 %2 years. She preferred to end the streateries at the end of the month but
did not get a second on the motion even though two other Councilmember said that was their preference.
Lacking the ability to end the streateries now, which the majority of her constituents support, many of
whom are older citizens although she recognized that some young families with children enjoy the
streateries, she will support Councilmember Chen's motion because it is more limiting than the original
main motion and requires the streateries to be removed within 30 days if the business is unable to pay a fair
price.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the amendment was $4,000 for 4 months which is $1,000/month, an
amount that was not pulled out of thin air. Seventeen businesses have it great, some have outdoor and indoor
dining. The $1,000 is based on square footage for the parking spaces which are approximately 250 square
feet; $25-50/square feet equates to $1,000. She said a well -thought out program that extended outside the
downtown would not have resulted in these shacks that people do not like. She objected to the use of the
word appalling, saying she was just trying to figure out the best thing for the City. She supports businesses
and is downtown a lot but does not see the streateries being used much. One restaurant with a streatery has
been closed all week and another is only open Wednesday — Sunday. A car ran into a streatery and it was
not fixed for three days. The streateries are very popular with restaurants who did not have indoor dining
like the one next to the theater. Similarly people like the streatery at the MAR KET because it used to only
be takeout. The streateries were an innovative and kneej erk reaction and thanks to Shubert Ho who assisted
with the structure design. She preferred to have a permanent program with unique pop-up restaurants May -
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 12
Packet Pg. 130
8.4.a
September. She reiterated Councilmember Chen was not pulling numbers out of air, all the amounts are
supported. She believed the streateries should be sunsetted but she would support the amendment. There
needs to be a vision for downtown post -pandemic. The streateries only support 17 of the downtown
businesses, many are not being used and there are other outdoor dining options available for those who
need it. She will support the amendment along with developing a better program that provides for pop-up
restaurants throughout Edmonds.
Councilmember L. Johnson reiterate as Ms. McLaughlin stated most other cities do not charge a fee and
the few that do, the highest is $400/month. With the proposed fee, Edmonds is saying they believe in
charging 10 times the highest fee, something that did not sit well with her.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of information, pointing out the amount was not $4,000/month,
it is $1,000/month for 4 months. Mayor Nelson pointed out the highest fee was a $400 flat fee, not
$400/month.
Councilmember L. Johnson said a $4,000 fee is 30 times the highest fee that other cities charge, a $400 flat
fee. She found that astounding.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of clarification, stating DEMA said they were willing to pay $500-
750/month. Mayor Nelson said that was argument, not a point of clarification. He suggested
Councilmember Buckshnis make that argument during her comments.
Councilmember L. Johnson continued, the proposed fee was 30 times the highest fee charged by another
city. She found that elitist and astounding to say that Edmonds is so different that it can charge a fee 30
times the highest fee charged by another city. In response to the idea of using out -of -the box thinking and
sometime in the future do pop-up restaurants as an appeasement conflates that the streateries are a
pandemic -necessitated program meant to help restaurants stay afloat. It is a fantastic byproduct that has
increased tourism and shown what could happen in the future. Right now the focus should be on continuing
to keep restaurants afloat because the pandemic is not over.
In response to Councilmember K. Johnson's statement that the majority of her constituents were not in
favor, Councilmember L. Johnson said she did not know what to do with that because they have the same
constituents and have been receiving the same information and the same emails. That can only be true if
Councilmember K. Johnson was only considering the viewpoint of a select portion of the community
because the majority of constituents support the streateries.
Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of clarification, stating she was speaking about her constituents
who contact her, not the Council as a whole.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she was surprised her thoughts were so controversial. The idea of
sunsetting streateries on December 31st is not only anti -business, but also cruel. It is in the middle of the
holiday season, the busiest time and when there will probably be a huge surge. She did not understand what
goal some Councilmembers have with ending the streateries program and doing something creative in the
fixture. The intent of the streateries program is to keep restaurants going and to help economic and public
health, not an idea for the future. Edmonds is special but not so special that it should charge 30 times what
another city charges. She was very disappointed in what she was hearing and hoped the Council would put
public and economic health at the forefront and move past individual, self-centered opposition.
Councilmember Chen said DEMA proposed a fee of $500-700/month per parking space. He was taking the
low end, $500 x 2 parking spaces is $1,000. He did not appreciate the comment about some
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 13
Packet Pg. 131
8.4.a
Councilmembers don't care about businesses. Downtown businesses are not just restaurants, it is seniors
who are encouraged to speak up, retailers, movie theater, the whole community, not just 17 restaurants.
Council President Paine said the Council heard from businesses who were offering to pay $500-700/month.
She understood from Mr. Doherty that the City has the ability to lease 40 parking spaces in a downtown
lot. Mr. Doherty answered the parking lot near Bank of America, used in conjunction with Walkable Main
Street, was rented on the weekends during the summer. He has contacted them about potentially renting the
lot as a mitigation measure if the streateries are continued and it would be available. Council President
Paine asked if the fee structure proposed by the stakeholder group was doable or could the parking lot be
leased using other funding. Mr. Doherty advised ARPA funds could be used to lease the 40 spaces in the
parking lot.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she has received messages from downtown businesses that
Councilmember Chen is perhaps in error, their proposal was $500 for two parking spaces. As the liaison to
the Snohomish Health District, she relayed COVID is not over yet and the new variant is much more
contagious than previous variants although it may be less fatal. For those that think everything is fine and
it's okay to eat inside, they are sticking their head in the sand. She reiterated it was appalling that some
Councilmembers were not listening to DEMA and what the downtown businesses are saying and instead
were listening to the 20 people that "keep battering us left and right" regarding getting rid of the streateries
for various reasons. Councilmembers who want to do what is best for Edmonds need to do what keeps these
businesses alive. Creating an environment where downtown businesses do not have the same equality as
the rest of Edmonds is appalling.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said there are a number of people who think parking spaces near their
houses are free, but in fact it is public right-of-way. She recalled hearing people who live on 9' and on 100t'
say the parking spaces in front of their homes were theirs and questioned whether the City intended to
charge those residents a fee. If the downtown businesses are charged for using the parking spaces of a
streatery, the people who use public right-of-way as their own parking should also be charged. Anyone that
does not think that is appropriate is pandering to "those that are high contributors into the future." If the
Council is charging for parking spaces downtown, they need to charge people who utilize public parking
as their own.
Councilmember Buckshnis said 9 of the 17 restaurants with streateries have outdoor dining and some of
the restaurants with streateries expanded into other areas of the City. Comments have included that retailers
need the parking spaces; retailers have been more than kind and they are suffering. She did not understand
why restaurants need to have both a streatery and outdoor dining. The emergency pandemic is over and
although a new variant is emerging, there are many great outdoor dining options available. She summarized
some people want to park downtown and some restaurants with streateries already have outdoor dining,
many people are tired of shacks and want the streateries sunsetted with 15 days to remove them and then
look at an overall, global project for the future as the streateries have been a successful for a short period
of time. That short period of time, 18 months, has passed. Many people quit talking about the streateries
because no one was listening. Like Councilmember K. Johnson, many of her constituents are older people
and they do not come downtown because they cannot find parking.
Mayor Nelson commented the discussion has been going on for an hour and 50 minutes and
Councilmembers are beginning to repeat themselves. He was uncertain anyone would be persuaded by
further discussion.
Councilmember L. Johnson emphasized the emergency pandemic is not over and it is reckless to say
otherwise. Over 800,000 United States citizens have lost their lives and it is projected that another 40,000
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 14
Packet Pg. 132
8.4.a
will lose their lives before January. She reiterated the emergency pandemic is not over and the City Council,
as leaders, should not be putting that information out.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas double dared Councilmember Buckshnis to sit out in the rain in some of
the outdoor dining spaces, most of which do not have roofs. DEMA offered a proposal and she was
frustrated and appalled that some Councilmembers did not support downtown businesses.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she does support downtown businesses. She pointed out a couple facts;
Councilmember Chen's motion allows 30 days for restaurants who do not want to pay the fee to remove
their structure. The fee is based on DEMA's offer of $500-750/month which totals $3000 for 4 months;
Councilmember Chen's proposal is $4,000. Of the 17 restaurants with streateries, 9 have outdoor dining
and/or patio dining, some with well -structured roofs and some of a more temporary nature. There needs to
be more parking downtown; anyone going to a restaurant, a business or retailer should be able to use that
parking. Currently, most of the parking is taken up by the streateries that are only used for a few hours a
day. Lacking the ability to end streateries at the end of December, she will support Councilmember Chen's
motion.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas repeated what she heard from business owners that their proposal was
$500/month for two parking spaces. The fact that they recommended $500 is something the Council should
consider and agree to.
Councilmember Olson read from the letter, we propose a range of $500-750/month for the usage of the 2
parking stalls. To Councilmember K. Johnson's point, the proposal is close to the high end of their range.
She was offended by the rhetoric and assertions that Councilmembers aren't pro -business or don't care
about businesses as that was not fair or accurate. She has looked at this inside and out for the last 6-8 months
and felt allowing the streateries to continue without a fee would be unfair to other businesses that have
already made great compromise to accommodate the streateries.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said it would also be fair for those who are using Edmonds parking strips
for their own parking. If the Council wants to charge businesses $500-750, they also need charge those
parking their vehicles in the City's rights -of -way. That is fair and something the Council should move
forward with.
Councilmember L. Johnson said she supports a fee that can be justified although she was uncertain what
that was. She would prefer to allow the administration to research and come up with an appropriate fee, but
that does not appear to be what is happening.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE, TO
AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO CHARGE $500 PER MONTH ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR UP
TO 6 MONTHS.
Councilmember Buckshnis said Councilmember Chen's motion was for four months. Mayor Nelson
clarified the amendment changed the fee and added two months to Councilmember Chen's motion.
Councilmember Chen recalled asking 2-3 weeks ago what would be a reasonable fee and asked if staff had
developed a more reasonable fee structure than DEMA's proposal. Ms. McLaughlin answered Edmonds
does not have a paid parking structure which makes it difficult to assess the value of a parking space in
downtown Edmonds. Typically the right-of-way is used for the collective good. Cities that have paid
parking programs have a methodology to develop the cost of parking. Edmonds has not done that so she
does not have that amount. She cautioned against negotiating that value at will rather than going through a
tried and true methodology. It is important to recognize the collective public good and for it not to be a
private negotiation with private property owners or merchants.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 15
Packet Pg. 133
8.4.a
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if it would be appropriate to make an amendment to direct the
administration to come up with a defensible fee. Mayor Nelson stated, "we have and you've heard it." Ms.
McLaughlin advised the current fee is a $110 flat fee with a $30 extension fee. The City does not charge
for inspections but that is the reason for the extension fee.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS,
AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K.
JOHNSON, CHEN, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING NO.
Mr. Taraday said he listened carefully to Councilmember Chen's amendment and tried to draft text to be
inserted into the code so he could share his interpretation of the amendment. He did not include the point
about the task force as that did not belong in City code and the Council could vote on that later.
Councilmember K. Johnson said Councilmember Chen emailed the amendment to Councilmembers earlier
this week. Mr. Taraday said he did not receive the amendment. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she
also did not receive it.
Mr. Taraday reviewed how the code language would be revised if Councilmember Chen's amendment
passed:
• Sunset date changed to April 30, 2022
• 18.70.050.B changed to reflect that beginning January 1, 2022, the fee to extend a streatery permit
shall be $1,000 per month due on the first of each month and requiring streatery operators not
wishing to pay the permit extension fee to remove the streatery no later than the 15t' of the month
after the last month for which the fee was paid.
Mr. Taraday said the above was his attempt to illustrate how the amendment would be reflected in the code
Councilmember Chen said what Mr. Taraday added to the code was not what he said. He restated the
motion:
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES THROUGH THE END OF
APRIL 2022 WITH A ONE-TIME APPLICATION FEE OF $4,000 PER STREATERY. EACH
STREATERY MUST COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF EXISTING CODE AND OTHER
APPLICABLE LAWS. BUSINESSES WITH EXISTING STREATERIES THAT DO NOT WISH TO
APPLY FOR THE EXTENSION WOULD HAVE UNTIL MIDNIGHT OF JANUARY 15, 2022 TO
REMOVE IT. ANY FEE COLLECTED WILL BE USED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC
MAKING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AVAILABLE FOR BUSINESSES IMPACTED BY THE
STREATERY SPECIFICALLY BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROVIDING FREE PARKING MADE
AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC.
Mr. Taraday clarified Councilmember Chen's motion was a one-time fee.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed opposition to the amendment because it required each business
to pay $4,000 in order to have outdoor dining.
Councilmember Chen said given there was a misunderstanding about what DEMA offered, $500-750 per
streatery which take up two parking spaces, he offered to correct the amendment to cut the one-time fee in
half to $2,000. That would use the lower end of the fee proposed by DEMA, commenting it was extremely
generous for other businesses. The pandemic does not impact just restaurants, it impacts us all.
Councilmember Olson asked who seconded the motion. She recalled it was either Councilmember
Buckshnis or her. Councilmember Olson said she would accept $750 per month, but not $500.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 16
Packet Pg. 134
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas encouraged Councilmembers to vote against this as requiring $750/month
from businesses who are struggling is absolutely ridiculous. It was appalling to assume they could afford
that and she agreed with Councilmember L. Johnson that it was an elitist approach. She would agree to
$500 for 2 parking spaces as DEMA proposed.
Council President Paine wanted to understand what numbers were being proposed as numbers were being
floated around like Let's Make a Deal. It will need to be clear to write the ordinance and for
Councilmembers to know what they are voting on.
Councilmember K. Johnson reminded according to Robert's Rules of Order, Councilmembers can only
speak twice on any motion and that has been exceeded. Mayor Nelson concurred.
Councilmember Olson said in an effort to bring the emotion down and get rational, she assured restaurants
were not struggling. She referred to staff s research that found restaurants were doing even better than the
retailers. The Council wants everyone to be successful, the ordinance is not being extended because
restaurants are struggling, but that was the reason the original ordinance was adopted. Staffs research
justifies a more market -based approach for the additional dining space. If the streatery is helping their
business, they should pay fair market value for the public space and providing that value back to the public.
With regard to the amount, if she was considered the seconder to Councilmember Chen's motion, she will
withdraw the second if the amount is below $750/month.
Mr. Taraday suggested treating Councilmember Chen's change as an amendment to the main motion.
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED TO CHANGE THE FEE TO $2,000. MOTION FAILED FOR
LACK OF A SECOND.
At Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' request, Councilmember Chen reread the motion:
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING EDMONDS STREATERIES THROUGH THE END OF
APRIL 2022 WITH A ONE-TIME APPLICATION FEE OF $4,000 PER STREATERY.
STREATERY MUST COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF EXISTING CODE. BUSINESSES WITH
STREATERIES THAT DO NOT WISH TO APPLY FOR EXTENSION WILL HAVE UNTIL
MIDNIGHT OF JANUARY 15, 2022 TO REMOVE THEM. ANY FEE COLLECTED WILL BE
USED TO PAY FOR PARKING SPACES AND MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
Mr. Taraday reviewed how the code language would be revised if Councilmember Chen's amendment
passed:
• Sunset date changed to April 30, 2022
• 18.70.050.13 changed to reflect that beginning January 1, 2022, the fee to extend a streatery permit
shall be a lump sum payment of $4,000 due on December 31, 2021. Streatery operators not wishing
to pay the permit extension fee shall remove the streatery no later than 11:59 p.m. on January 15,
2022. The fee collected shall be used to rent parking spaces that will be made available to the
public.
Councilmember Olson recalled DEMA's proposal included something about being caught up on their fees
with the City. Mayor Nelson advised the amendment before the Council is as Councilmember Chen read.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
CHEN, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS
AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 17
Packet Pg. 135
8.4.a
Councilmember K. Johnson asked if it was now necessary to vote on the motion since the amendment
seemed to eliminated it. Mr. Passey advised the Council was voting on the amended ordinance so it was
appropriate to vote.
Councilmember Olson asked for clarification, relaying her understanding throughout the process of
amendments that a yes vote would continue the streateries and a vote no would not. Mayor Nelson advised
the main motion is to approve the ordinance as amended. Councilmember Olson asked if a no vote meant
the streateries did not continue. Mayor Nelson agreed.
At Councilmember K. Johnson's request, Mr. Taraday repeated the main motion.
TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE IN THE PACKET AS AMENDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
CHEN'S AMENDMENT THAT THE COUNCIL ADOPTED.
UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K.
JOHNSON, CHEN, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO INCLUDE THE DEMA RECOMMENDATION THAT
ALL FEES FOR A PARTICIPANT BE UP-TO-DATE.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, stating the amendment should have been offered before
the Council voted on the ordinance.
Councilmember Olson asked if there was any way to include it. Mr. Taraday said someone who voted on
the prevailing side of the last vote could move to reconsider.
5. 2022 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
Community Services & Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty reviewed language added to the
2022 Legislative Agenda that reflects changes offered by Councilmembers at a previous meeting with
regard to Gun Violence Prevention, Law Enforcement Laws, Bolster Resources for Infrastructure, Public
Defense Costs, and Land Use Issues. In addition as Ranked Choice Voting was removed from Tuesday's
agenda, the Council may wish to remove that from the Legislative Agenda. the
Councilmember K. Johnson commented there is usually a bullet regarding unfunded mandates. Mr. Doherty
referred to the bullet, Fiscal Impacts of Legislation and Rule Making.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE 2022 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING PARAGRAPH.
Councilmember Olson said she will support the motion but she is personally disappointed that ranked
choice voting was not included because she feels it has a value and that communities will be well served
by adopting that approach. She looked forward to that agenda item and possibly adopting a resolution if the
Council and community are comfortable with it. As was discussed previously, if the House bill passes, it
allows municipalities to do ranked choice voting but does not require it. She was personally disappointed
it was not included in the legislative agenda but she looked forward to considering the resolution and having
a robust discussion in the future.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 18
Packet Pg. 136
8.4.a
1. OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Chen wished Happy Holidays to everyone including City staff, the Mayor, Council and
the public. He urged everyone to enjoy the holidays, but the Omicron variant is still around, they should be
safe and to get vaccinated to protect themselves, their family and the public.
Councilmember K. Johnson said this was the last meeting of the year for the City Council who have earned
a well -deserved break. She wished the public a very Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy New Year
and whatever holidays are appropriate to them.
Council President Paine thanked Mr. Doherty for his years of service in the public sector, commenting 40
years is a long time and this is a well -deserved retirement. She imagined it would be a retirement fail and
that he would find something interesting to do and send the City postcards from wherever that was. She
hoped he continued to work on his language skills, international travel and other things he enjoyed. She
will miss his sense of humor and his erudite look at things.
Council President Paine thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her years of service. She expected
that she would still be involved after 12 years on the Council. She appreciated Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas' advocacy for Highway 99 issues and human services that are important to the community. She
wished everyone Happy Holidays and urged the public to enjoy the holidays, stay safe, and enjoy their
families.
Councilmember Olson commented it was fitting for a very tiring year that the Council had this last very
tiring session. The streateries were a good way in the short term to address the COVID emergency, but they
are just one way to provide COVID-safe dining. She encouraged restaurants to offer an indoor dining option
with proof of vaccination, along the lines of what the Edmonds Center for the Arts has chosen to do,
anticipating a lot of patrons would appreciate that. She wished everyone Happy Holidays and gave her best
wishes to Mr. Doherty and Councilmember Fraley-Monillas.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she already gave Mr. Doherty her video. If this had been a regular meeting,
she was certain there would have been a lot of people thanking Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her
years of service. Since she is the old timer, she will provide a walk back in history. Over the 12 years she
and Councilmember Fraley-Monillas have served, they have worked with five mayors, six finance directors
including two interim directors, three parks and recreation directors, four human resource directors, two
community service directors, three police chief including one acting chief, thirteen councilmembers and
three council executive assistants. They have read thousands of documents, participated in public forums
and town halls and it was obvious Councilmember Fraley-Monillas deserved a standing ovation because
12 years was a very long time. She hoped people realized the amount of work that goes into the job; it was
obvious Councilmember Fraley-Monillas has her heart in it. She appreciated all her hard work over the
years for Highway 99 and the Diversity Commission. Most importantly she is a great mom and Dominic is
a wonderful man. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas has given him the opportunity to also flourish by
bringing him to meetings and things of that nature. She wished peace out to Dominic and Councilmember
Fraley-Monillas. She hoped Councilmember Fraley-Monillas would enjoy her Tuesday evenings and no
longer worry about coming to Council meetings. She wished all a Merry Christmas, Happy New Year,
Happy Hanukkah, Happy Kwanzaa and Happy Holidays.
Councilmember L. Johnson said Councilmember Fraley-Monillas has been a model of strong leadership
and dedication to service. She has shown that it is okay to rock the boat when necessary, and although she
sometimes made a few more waves than she was ready for, her unwavering dedication to promoting
equitable change is clearly evident. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas will be missed here but she was sure
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 19
Packet Pg. 137
she would be seeing her. To Mr. Doherty, she was jealous of his retirement and anticipated he would have
a blast. She wished him the very best, commenting it had been a pleasure to work with him and his creativity
will have a lasting, positive imprint on the City.
Councilmember L. Johnson said the pandemic is still with us so she urged the public to take all precautions
however they may be gathering. Numbers are expected to rise and she encouraged the public to wear masks,
wash hands, practice social distancing, test, and take all other precautions. She hoped everyone was able to
find peace and comfort over the season as we enter the winter solstice and light slowly returns.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked her family, commenting 12 years of being locked into the Council
has been a long road. They have been supportive and stood behind her from day one. She thanked those
who have agreed with her when comes to various issues, most recently Council President Paine,
Councilmember L. Johnson and former Councilmember Distelhorst, she appreciated them a great deal. She
also expressed her appreciation for former Councilmembers Lora Petso, Strom Peterson, Steve Bernheim,
Michael Plunkett, and Dave Orvis, Councilmembers who helped guide her and she thanked them for their
leadership and understanding. She also thanked Natalie Seitz and Fay May who stand up for Highway 99;
John Reed, a good person who understood what Edmonds needed and whom she missed; Mar ie Fields who
is amazing; Vern Woods, Erika Mayor Nelson for her great leadership; Val Stewart, Mike Shaw who has
always been there for her; Maria Montalvo; Joe Hampson; Bob and Linda Moony, her aunt and uncle who
have been part of the City for a long time; Rose and Maria Cantwell, friends from day one whom she
appreciated.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas continued, that being said, although she had a long list of people to thank,
she urged everyone to be careful moving forward. There is a group called the Downtown Elections group
that became Edmonds Good Governance and then the Civic Roundtable who have included ACE in their
posse as far as what they believe in. She wanted citizens to understand they were in control of their City,
not these groups, not those people or even the Council. Citizens need to continue to stand up for what they
believe in and understand what Edmonds needs. She loves Edmonds and has lived here most of her life,
over 35 years. Edmonds is a fantastic city and everyone wants the same thing, how they get there may
differ. She encouraged citizens to continue to stand up for what is right, assuring she will continue to be
involved. She has received multiple calls about creating a new blog regarding what's behind the City
Council, what people don't know, and what they need to know. She signed I love you, and assured she
would be here in the future although sitting in a different place. She will have more freedom in speech
which she will enjoy. Currently she is held to the Council Code of Conduct but won't be in the future.
fi��`L�T:KYK� a ►3Ti iI �I�Y lf.
Mayor Nelson thanked Mr. Doherty for his many years of service to many cities, but especially Edmonds.
He enjoyed working with him as a Councilmember as well as Mayor. He greatly appreciated his experience,
advice and counsel, his willingness and eagerness to dive into any and every challenge and problem, and
his professionalism and dedication. He will miss working with him and wished him all the best moving
forward, noting the City will not be the same without him.
Mayor Nelson thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for her service, stating he had enjoyed working
with her as a Councilmember, has enjoyed her energy and passion for the City and wished her all the best.
He wished the Council and future Councilmembers the best now and into the future. He hoped all had a
wonderful and safe holiday, and urged all to get boosters and vaccinations if they hadn't yet. He wished all
a Happy New Year.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:44 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 20
Packet Pg. 138
8.4.a
a+
a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 21
Packet Pg. 139
8.4.a
Public Comment for 12/16 Council Meeting:
From: Greg
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 4:06 PM
To: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Management
The council has heard many reasons from a concerned public about the direction that the city plans for
restoring of one of the jewels of Edmonds.
If restoration is to be managed by the Stormwater Utility department, it would be helpful for all if we
could be provided with a clear explanation for why the city considers the prime function of the Edmonds
marsh estuary to be stormwater retention.
Regards
Greg Ferguson
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
December 16, 2021
Page 22
Packet Pg. 140
8.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of Payroll check #64947 dated 12/03/2021 for $1,233.64, checks #64948 through #64950 for
$4,425.90 dated 12/17/2021 and payroll direct deposit for $601,997.12, benefit checks #64951 through
#64956 and wire payments of $593,376.34 for the pay period December 1, 2021 through December 15,
2021.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
benefit checks summary 12-15-21
paryoll earnings report 12-15-21
payroll earnings report 12-03-21
Packet Pg. 141
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,020 - 12/01/2021 to 12/15/2021
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
64951
12/17/2021
bpas
BPAS
5,020.93
64952
12/17/2021
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
5,904.00
64953
12/17/2021
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
565.26
64954
12/17/2021
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
3,330.68
64955
12/17/2021
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
4,741.50
64956
12/17/2021
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
3,879.52
23,441.89
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
3297
12/17/2021
awc
AWC
329,500.65
3299
12/17/2021
edm
CITY OF EDMONDS
120.00
3301
12/17/2021
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N317761
94,062.93
3302
12/17/2021
us
US BANK
114,227.06
3304
12/17/2021
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
25,203.62
3305
12/17/2021
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
6,055.69
3307
12/17/2021
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
764.50
569,934.45
Grand Totals: 593,376.34
12/17/2021
8.5.a
c
r
.y
0
Q.
m
Direct Deposit
m
0.00
L
:a
0.00
vi
0.00
Y
0.00
t
0.00
0.00
r
c
a�
0.00
c
0
L
Direct Deposit
a
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0-
0.00
CL
Q
0.00
0.00
j
0.00
r
N
0.00
M
E
E
N
N
Y
V
d
t
V
4-
N
a
d
a-:
C
N
E
t
V
f�
r
Q
Packet Pg. 142
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,020 (12/01/2021 to 12/15/2021)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
44.00
0.00
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
24.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
665.59
28,106.65
122
VACATION
VACATION
635.66
26,063.89
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
60.50
2,706.56
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
43.00
1,504.33
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
162.75
6,744.36
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
60.00
2,429.71
130
COMP HOURS
Holiday Compensation Used
18.00
635.56
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
46.00
1,853.12
135
SICK
WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE
4.00
133.73
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
68.00
2,221.88
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
170.00
7,526.51
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
176.06
9,703.63
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
49.00
3,231.42
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
17,110.50
713,259.34
194
SICK
Emergency Sick Leave
96.50
3,685.70
195
REGULAR HOURS
ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
16.00
789.16
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
206.00
10,168.89
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
9.50
387.05
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
48.00
2,740.01
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
14.00
1,276.36
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
324.50
26,884.41
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
16.75
1,250.79
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
-104.21
405
ACTING PAY
OUT OF CLASS - POLICE
0.00
518.93
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
349.01
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,614.83
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
54.75
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
201.00
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
4.00
0.00
903
MISCELLANEOUS
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
0.00
-37.50
905
KELLY DAY
Police Kelly Day Adjustment
-51.00
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
82.61
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
172.94
12/17/2021 Packet Pg. 143
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,020 (12/01/2021 to 12/15/2021)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC II Certification
0.00
96.39
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstructionist
0.00
90.46
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
180.92
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
593.15
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
360.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
165.44
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
123.92
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
850.86
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
773.36
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
585.90
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
6,406.08
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
447.84
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
266.41
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
86.54
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
973.61
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
684.10
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 9%
0.00
4,595.08
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 7%
0.00
633.16
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 5%
0.00
888.02
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
251.44
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
388.54
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3%
0.00
1,268.93
Iq6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
307.81
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
408.72
Iq8
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 8%
0.00
477.80
melv
VACATION
Medical Leave Vacation
89.00
3,213.00
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
123.92
ooc
MISCELLANEOUS
OUT OF CLASS
0.00
186.00
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
116.54
pfmp
ABSENT
Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup
230.50
0.00
pfms
SICK
Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
36.50
1,398.79
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,582.06
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER
0.00
196.58
pto
MISCELLANEOUS
Traininq Officer
0.00
157.28
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
301.49
12/17/2021 Packet Pg. 144
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,020 (12/01/2021 to 12/15/2021)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
196.58
St
REGULAR HOURS
Serqeant Pay
0.00
147.44
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
123.92
vab
VACATION
VACATION ADD BACK
21.78
0.00
20,654.84 $886,547.75
Total Net Pay: $606,423.02
8.5.b
L:
c
0
L
Q
0
CU
P
L
Q
Q
Q
0
Q
a
12/17/2021
Packet Pg. 145
Hour Type Hour Class
190 REGULAR HOURS
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,080 (12/03/2021 to 12/03/2021)
Description
REGULAR HOURS
Hours
Amount
62.25 1,443.29
62.25 $1,443.29
Total Net Pay: $1,233.64
8.5.c
12/17/2021 Packet Pg. 146
8.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #250404 through #250512 dated December 16, 2021 for $260,467.80, claim
checks #250513 through #250615 dated December 22, 2021 for $524,951.75 and wire payments of
$31,101.11 and $11,084.49
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 12-16-21
claims 12-22-21
wire 12-17-21
wire 12-22-21
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 12-29-21
Packet Pg. 147
8.6.a
vchlist Voucher List Page:
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun vi
250404
12/14/2021 078787 FW WAAURORA MARKETPLACE LLC
12132021
LITTLE CITY HALL SECURITY DEPC
(D
Little City Hall First Month's Rent
E
001.000.60.557.20.45.00
4,453.8E a
Little City Hall Security Deposit
001.000.60.557.20.45.00
4,453.8E '3
Total :
8,907.7E -o
c
250405
12/16/2021 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
52245
WWTP:12/8/21 PEST CONTROL SE
�a
N
12/8/21 Pest Control Service
U
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
73.0( t
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
7.5E M
Total:
80.55 Z
0
250406
12/16/2021 075132 AERZEN USA CORP
SEPI-21-005788
WWTP: PO 709 AERTRONIC, ELEC
PO 709 AERTRONIC, ELECT. CONT
@
>
0
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
952.3E a
Freight
c'
Q
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
160.5( "
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
115.7z
Total :
1,228.6: cv
250407
12/16/2021 065568 ALLWATER INC
111621016
WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 11/30/,
N
E
Acct COEWaste:-
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
67.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.9
Total :
73.91
�a
250408
12/16/2021 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC
22651
WWTP: 11/3/21 COURIER SERVICE
Q
11/3/21 COURIER SERVICES
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
32.3(
Total :
32.3(
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 148
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 2
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250409
12/16/2021 077968 ANIMAL MEDICAL CTR OF SEATTLE
605849
INV 605849 - CUST 234493 - EDMOI
ACE TOOTH PROCEDURE
(D
001.000.41.521.26.41.00
11930.8' E
misc sales tax %
a
001.000.41.521.26.41.00
13.4(
Total:
L
1,944.21 3
250410
12/16/2021 076934 ANSELL HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS LLC
21336481
STORM - MICROFLEX GLOVES
c
STORM - MICROFLEX GLOVES
y
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
283.4(
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
29.4;
Total:
312.81
250411
12/16/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
656000045814
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
o
'@
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
29.5E o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
3.0 1 Q
656000064157
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
N
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
29.5E
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
3.0, N
656000074640
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
E
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
ca
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2�
FLEET DIVISION MATS
c
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1( E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
1.5E +°
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.4-
656000085268
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6
Page:
2
Packet Pg. 149
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250411 12/16/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
a0i
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1' E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
a
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
3
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1' Y
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0£
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.3E 'sa
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6 1 O
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6, o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6, Q
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
r
0.6,
CD
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.3'
656000085269 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2� U
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
E
t
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
1.5E
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.4-
656000135111 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 150
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
250411
12/16/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
656000150589
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
656000154931
WWTP: 12/8/21 UNIFORMS,TOWEL
Mats/Towels $47.88 + $4.99 tax = $5
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
3 lab coats @ $17.each = $0.51 + tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Total:
250412
12/16/2021 078761 ART START NORTHWEST
12162021
ERPF NONPROFIT SUPPORT GRAD
ERPF NONPROFIT SUPPORT GRAD
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Total
250413
12/16/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
122480
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,904
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,904
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2,904
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2,904
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2,904
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
8.6.a
Page: 4
Amoun
m
3.0-, E
�a
a
a�
63.4, 3
6.5�
Y
a�
52.8 ,
E
320.3 ,
0
�a
0
18,000.0( a
18,000.0( Q
N
CD
203.1, N
203.1, E
209.3'
c
617.7f E
t
617.7,1
a
20.8,
20.8,
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 151
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250413
12/16/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
21.4E
Total:
1,914.2'
250414
12/16/2021 075263 AVR PRODUCTION SERVICES LLC
12142021
HOLIDAY MARKET DJ SERVICES F(
HOLIDAY MARKET DJ SERVICES F(
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
1,200.0(
Total :
1,200.0(
250415
12/16/2021 002258 BENS EVER READY
21042
2021 ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHEF
2021 ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHEF
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
2,141.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
222.6,
Total :
2,363.E ,
250416
12/16/2021 074307 BLUE STAR GAS
1274284
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 520.30 GF
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 520.30 GF
511.000.77.548.68.34.12
1,115.6,
1275333
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 605.50 GF
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 605.50 GF
511.000.77.548.68.34.12
1,296.5f
1286205
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 657.80 GF
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 657.80 GF
511.000.77.548.68.34.12
1,426.7z
Total:
3,838.9'
250417
12/16/2021 002800 BRAKE & CLUTCH SUPPLY
667416
UNIT 20 - PARTS/ HUB CAP
UNIT 20 - PARTS/ HUB CAP
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
39.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
4.1 E
Total :
44.1:
250418
12/16/2021 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
10053 YOGA
10053 YOGA INSTRUCTION
10053 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
1,019.2(
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 152
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250418 12/16/2021 072005 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
250419 12/16/2021 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY
250420 12/16/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 6
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued) Total : 1,019.2(
95274057 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA, DARASE- E
E
STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA, DARASE-
�a
125.000.68.542.61.31.00 257.&
10.1 % Sales Tax L
125.000.68.542.61.31.00 26.0' 3
Total:
283.8E c
�a
27409810 CONTRACT/METER CHARGES
Y
contract/meter charges
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
302.& U
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
31.4�
27409817 CONTRACT/METER CHARGES
contract/meter charges
c
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
M
302.8< o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
31.4� Q
27759862 CANON 57501
contract charge 11/1 - 11 /30/2021 -
N
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
181.6< cfl
contract charge 11/1 - 11 /30/2021 -
N
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
22.7(
contract charge 11 /1 - 11 /30/2021 -
E
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
18.8� c
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
2.3E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.3E Q
27759863 P&R C5750 COPIER: CONTRACT OE
P&R C5750 Copier: Contract Number
001.000.64.571.21.45.00 250.6E
27759864 C/A 572105-1 CONTRACT# 06619
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 153
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
250420
12/16/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Continued)
Finance dept copier contract charge
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
27759865
CONTRACT/METER CHARGES
contract/meter charges
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
27787785
ENG COPIER SERVICES DECEMBE
ENG COPIER SERVICES DECEMBE
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
Total:
250421
12/16/2021 075892 CASCADIAART MUSEUM
TPA CAM
TPA CAM 2021 GRANT
TPA CAM 2021 GRANT
123.000.64.573.20.41.40
Total
250422
12/16/2021 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
RN11211001
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
Total
250423 12/16/2021 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 121006355 121006355 - EDMONDS PD
SHARE - ALERT TRAINING MUNITIC
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
Total
250424 12/16/2021 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S�
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl
8.6.a
Page: 7
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 154
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 8
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250424
12/16/2021 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
(Continued)
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
140.21
8498310301175191
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
E
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
001.000.64.571.29.42.00
a
140.2,
Total:
280.51 3
250425
12/16/2021 078378 CONSERVATION TECHNIX INC
1015
PROS PLAN PROFESSIONAL SERV
c
PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPA
N
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
485.2'
Total:
485Z D
250426
12/16/2021 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
NOV 2021
NOV 2021 - DRY CLEANING - EDMC
E
NOV 2021 DRY CLEANING CHARGE
f°
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
U
369.2£ -,--
Total
369.2F o
�a
250427
12/16/2021 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC
501083
E21 DA.SERVICES THRU 11/27/21
0
E21 DA.SERVICES THRU 11/27/21
a
126.000.68.595.61.41.00
2,067.7; Q
E21 DA.SERVICES THRU 11/27/21
r
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
1,214.3f
Total :
3,282.11 N
250428
12/16/2021 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
21-3181.1
E22JA.TO 21-05.SERVICES THRU 1
N
E22JA.TO 21-05.SERVICES THRU 1
E
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
268.0( 2
21-3182.1
E22GA.TO 21-06.SERVICES THRU 1
};
E22GA.TO 21-06.SERVICES THRU 1
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
268.0( E
21-3183.1
E22GA.TO 21-07.SERVICES THRU 1
E22GA.TO 21-07.SERVICES THRU 1
Q
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
268.0(
Total:
804.0(
250429
12/16/2021 007253 DUNN LUMBER
8353705
WADE JAMES THEATER - SUPPLIE
WADE JAMES THEATER - SUPPLIE
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 155
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
250429 12/16/2021 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued)
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total :
250430
12/16/2021 071255 ECOLIGHTS NORTHWEST LLC
INV-006279
FAC MAINT - RECYCLING FEES
FAC MAINT - RECYCLING FEES
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Total
250431
12/16/2021 074674 ECOLUBE RECOVERY LLC
3909113021
FLEET - REMOVAL OF USED OIL
FLEET - REMOVAL OF USED OIL
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
Total
250432
12/16/2021 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
00010121359
PM SUPPLIES: COPPER CORE PILL
PM SUPPLIES: COPPER CORE PILL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
00010121951
PM SUPPLIES: OIL
PM SUPPLIES: OIL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
250433
12/16/2021 060401 EDMONDS HARBOR INN INC
643
WWTP: JCLAY 2/12/21 STAY
JCLAY 2/12/21 STAY
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
682
WWTP: JCLAY 4/7/21 STAY
Jon Clay 4/7/21 Stay
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
723
WWTP: PRANDOLPH 5/25/21 STAY
PRANDOLPH 5/25/21 STAY
8.6.a
Page: 9
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 156
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250433 12/16/2021 060401 EDMONDS HARBOR INN INC
250434 12/16/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
Total
2580
WWTP: PO 481 ROPE
PO 481 Rope
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2718
PM: IRRIGATION VALVE CAPS
PM: IRRIGATION VALVE CAPS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2719
PM: PRIIMER, DUSTPAN
PM: PRIIMER, DUSTPAN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
250435 12/16/2021 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 10272 R. RALPH
250436 12/16/2021 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 10272 M. RALPH
250437 12/16/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00655
1-00925
Total :
10272 R. RALPH YOUTH SCHOLAR
10272 R. RALPH YOUTH SCHOLAR
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
10272 M. RALPH YOUTH SCHOLAR
10272 M. RALPH YOUTH SCHOLAR
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV
8.6.a
Page: 10
Amoun
110.9,
340.71 E,
�a
a
a�
33.9�
c
�a
3.5< y
Y
a�
t
13.1E
E
1.3,
0
M
39.9E o
L
a
4.1 E Q
T
N
CD
N
75.0(
75.0( E
2
U
53.9z
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 157
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 11
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250437 12/16/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
58.6( y
1-01950
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE,
E
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE,
ca
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
a
53.91
1-03950
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 200
3
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
1,147.8"
1-05350
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200
Y
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200
U
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
121.8E t
1-05705
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST/ MEl
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl
E
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
114.4E Z
1-13975
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER
p
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
623.3- o
Total:
L
2,173.9: a
Q
250438 12/16/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
AR207232
ENG COPIER NOVEMBER 2021
ENG COPIER NOVEMBER 2021
N
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
105.7-
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
10.9E N
Total:
116.7( E
2
250439 12/16/2021 076939 ESSENTRICALLY FIT LLC
10056 ESSENTRICS
10056 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI
U
10056 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
182.6( E
Total:
182.6( t
�a
250440 12/16/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
EDH936460
LEGAL DESCRIPT: CODE INTERPF
Q
Legal Descript: Code Interpretation -
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
33.6(
EDH944416
LEGAL DESCRIPT: BROWN PLN20
Legal Descript: Brown PLN2021-006
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 158
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250440 12/16/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
250441 12/16/2021 076809 GAGNER, SAMUEL
250442 12/16/2021 071845 GENERAL PACIFIC INC
250443 12/16/2021 078774 GLITTERATTI FACE & BODYART
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
EDH944420
LEGAL DESCRIPT: FISHER PLN20,
Legal Descript: Fisher PLN2021-007
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
EDH944715
LEGAL DESCRIPT: APP, PUBLIC Hi
Legal Descript: App, Public Hrg & SE
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
Total
GAGNER 12/2021
GAGNER EXPENSE CLAIM FROM S
PER DIEM - WARRENTON, OR 10/2',
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
Total
1423653 WATER - UTILITY PUMP
WATER - UTILITY PUMP
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total
12162021 ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Total
250444 12/16/2021 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 166401
250445 12/16/2021 012199 GRAINGER
9127561331
UNIT 28 - TIRES
UNIT 28 - TIRES
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
WA STATE TIRE FEE
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30
Total
FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ SPRING
8.6.a
Page: 12
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 159
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250445 12/16/2021 012199 GRAINGER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
250446 12/16/2021 078778 HARDWICK CONSULTING GROUP COE20211130
250447 12/16/2021 078785 HARLEY & SANDRA CRAIN 3-01000
250448 12/16/2021 078783 HAWK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 5839
250449 12/16/2021 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
250450 12/16/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
15963132
1023022
1523983
8.6.a
Page: 13
PO # Description/Account Amoun
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
26.3� E
FIRE STATION 17 - PARTS/ SPRING
a
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
253.7�
Total :
L
280.1f .3
INV COE 20211130 HARDWICK COl`
c
19.5 hours of administrative consultin
�a
y
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
3,412.5( U
Total :
3,412.5( t
#21-0827WA UTILITY REFUND
E
#21-0827WA Utility refund due to
f6
411.000.233.000
161.5: o
Total :
161.5:
WWTP: PO 711 ASBESTOS TESTIN
o
PO 711 ASBESTOS TESTING
a
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
870.0( Q
Total :
870.0( N
STORM - FUSION MACHINE & SERA
r-
STORM - FUSION MACHINE & SERA
422.000.72.531.40.48.00
725.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.48.00
75.4- U
Total :
800.41
c
a�
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ THEF
E
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ THEF
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
53.3z v
10.3% Sales Tax Q
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.4�
SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GAP FILLER
SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GAP FILLER
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 160
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250450 12/16/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 14
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
5.2E
10.3% Sales Tax
E
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
0.5z a
20982
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
65.&
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
6.7£ Y
271109
SEWER - SUPPLIES RETURNED
SEWER - SUPPLIES RETURNED
t
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
-5.2£
10.3% Sales Tax
M
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
-0.5z
4015243
STREET - CONCRETE SUPPLIES
o
STREET - CONCRETE SUPPLIES
�a
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
206.0( o
10.3% Sales Tax
L
a
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
21.2, Q
5023595
OLYMPIC RESTROOMS - SUPPLIEc
.r
T
OLYMPIC RESTROOMS - SUPPLIEc
N
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
16.9E r-
10.3% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
1.7E N
513790
SEWER - SUPPLIES (RETURNED)
E
SEWER - SUPPLIES (RETURNED)
2
U
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
5.2E };
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
0.5z E
513809
SEWER SUPPLIES/ GFCI TESTER
U
SEWER SUPPLIES/ GFCI TESTER
Q
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
11.9 1
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1.2<
513853 STREET - CONCRETE SUPPLIES
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 161
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250450 12/16/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 15
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
STREET - CONCRETE SUPPLIES
a0i
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
77.5E
E
10.3% Sales Tax
a
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
7.9�
6015041
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES
3
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
38.9(
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.0'
Y
6021364
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
3.0z
o
6054877
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES (RE7
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES (RE7
0
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.9z
0-
10.3% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
0.8,
r
6232338
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES RETICD
N
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES RETI
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
-7.9E
04
10.3% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
-0.8z
.
7094974
FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE - CABLE
�a
U
FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE - CABLE
};
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
207.0(
10.3% Sales Tax
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
21.3,
t
72832
STREET - SUPPLIES/ RAKES
STREET - SUPPLIES/ RAKES
Q
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
37.4z
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
3.8E
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 162
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 16
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250450
12/16/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
(Continued)
9014551
WATER - SUPPLIES
WATER - SUPPLIES
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
321.3E a
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
33.1( .3
90822
SEWER - SUPPLIES/ WATER PIPE I
SEWER - SUPPLIES/ WATER PIPE I
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
131.2.E w
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
13.5,
9623614
SEWER - SUPPLIES
E
SEWER - SUPPLIES
M
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
13.7,
10.3% Sales Tax
o
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1.4, �a
Total:
1,341.3E o
a
250451
12/16/2021 061013 HONEY BUCKET
0552444958
SR 104 & 5TH AVE S HONEY BUCK[
Q-
Q
SR 104 & 5TH AVE S HONEY BUCK[
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
111.6E
0552447260
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH PAF
CD
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH PAF
N
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
1,634.8E N
0552447261
PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET
E
PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET
2
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
249.1.E v
Total:
1,995.6E r-
t
250452
12/16/2021 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
3523132
LORRELL ESSENTIALS WALNUT FF
Lorrell Essentials Walnut Freestandin
001.000.62.558.60.35.00
283.0( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.558.60.35.00
29.4<
3523979
COPY PAPER FOR DEVELOPMENT
Copy paper for Development Serv. D(
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 163
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 17
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250452
12/16/2021 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
(Continued)
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
230.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
23.9,
Total:
566.3°
250453
12/16/2021 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
300-10094806
FLEET - PARTS
FLEET - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
39.9z
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
4.1,'
Tota I :
44.OS
250454
12/16/2021 076136 JEFF ANDERSON
BID - 12162021
BID/ED! DESIGN WORK FOR EDMC
BID/ED! DESIGN WORK FOR EDMC
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
1,300.0(
Total :
1,300.0(
250455
12/16/2021 078784 JOYCE & WAYNE ELLING
1-20475
#1351842 UTILITY REFUND
#1351842 Utility refund - received
411.000.233.000
202.4E
Total :
202.4E
250456
12/16/2021 075265 KBA INC
3006335
EOMA.SERVICES THRU 11/30/21
EOMA.SERVICES THRU 11/30/21
332.100.64.594.76.41.00
26,210.0E
EOMA.SERVICES THRU 11/30/21
125.000.68.595.61.41.00
2,560.5�
Total:
28,770.6°
250457
12/16/2021 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC
9661
UNIT 438 - PARTS/ CANTROL CONT
UNIT 438 - PARTS/ CANTROL CONT
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
291.6(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
30.3<
Total:
321.9:
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 164
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250458 12/16/2021 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
4725927
4726051
4727793
250459 12/16/2021 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0259817
250460 12/16/2021 074798 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE MK569386-OFF
250461 12/16/2021 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
PO # Description/Account
SHREDDING SERVICES
shredding services
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
shredding services
001.000.31.514.23.41.00
INV 4726051 - ACCT 2185-952778-8
SHRED 3 65GAL TOTES
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
SHREDDING SERVICES
shredding services
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Total
UNIT 109 - PARTS
UNIT 109 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total ;
P&R: HUMAN SERVICES RECEPTIC
P&R: HUMAN SERVICES RECEPTIC
001.000.63.557.20.35.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.63.557.20.35.00
Total
0778228-IN UNIT 66 - DEF
UNIT 66 - DEF
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0782360-IN UNIT 66 - DEF
UNIT 66 - DEF
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
8.6.a
Page: 18
Amoun
m
12.5( E,
�a
a
12.5(
L
3
12.0<
N
U
a�
72.4;
109.5t E
2
U
4-
0
261.2(
0
27.1, a
288.3 i Q
N
2,693.6< N
280.11 E
2,973.7-j n
U
c
a�
225.5( t
U
M
23.4E Q
250.8(
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 165
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250461 12/16/2021 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
250462 12/16/2021 024910 NORMED
250463 12/16/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 19
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
N
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
26.0£ ED
0782418-IN
FLEET - FILTERS
E
FLEET - FILTERS
ca
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
a
51.4,
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
5.3E
Total:
582.6E
50024
INV 50024 - EDMONDS PD
MINT ANTACID
t
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
33.7E
CETAFEN COLD TABS
E
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
32.0( U
IBUPROFEN TABS 50/2'S
p
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
28.7, -@
CETAFEN EXTRA
0
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
17.4£ m
CETAFEN
Q'
Q
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
22 4z "
IBUPROFEN 125/2'S
04
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
22.2,
10.4% Sales Tax
cv
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
16.2� N
Total:
172.9, E
2
212353065001
INV 212353065001 ACCT 90520437
U
PUBLIC WORKS - SUPPLIES/ CALE
c
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
120.6( E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
12.5z +°
212428905001 INV 212428905001 ACCT 90520437 Q
PUBLIC WORKS - SUPPLIES/ CALE
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 95.01
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.8�
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 166
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250463 12/16/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
212771375001
213672676001
250464 12/16/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER November, 2021
8.6.a
Page: 20
PO # Description/Account Amoun
INV 212771375001 - ACCT 9052043' a0i
CALENDAR - MORRISON E
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
6.9E
a
CALENDAR - BENNET/STRUM
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
5.41
3
#10 ENVELOPES
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
76.3(
CALENDAR -LYNN
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
1.91
Y
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
9.4z
E
INV 213672676001 - ACCT 9052043m
CALENDAR -LYNN
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
22.4E
o
CALENDAR-JENNA
�a
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
15.0( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
3.8� Q
Total :
379.5( r
N
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANS
CD
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
C�
001.000.237.120
341.2< N
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
E
001.000.237.130
6,888.7' 2
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
483.0(
State Patrol Death Investigation
E
001.000.237.330
52.8E U
Judicial Information Systems Account
fd
001.000.237.180
1,793.9, Q
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
49.6'
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 167
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250464 12/16/2021 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued)
250465 12/16/2021 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671
250466 12/16/2021 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC
250467 12/16/2021 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
053112
3685-175018
3685-175091
PO # Description/Account
001.000.237.250
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
Total
HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION
HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/
HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
UNIT 20 - PARTS/ QT GEAR LUBE
UNIT 20 - PARTS/ QT GEAR LUBE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
FLEET - PARTS/ FILTER & MIRROR!
FLEET - PARTS/ FILTER & MIRROR!
8.6.a
Page: 21
Amoun
683.4' y
E
314.9E a
a�
11.1- 3
11.1-
Y
251.91
t
300.1E E
0
�a
23.1, p
L
a
a
Q
152.4(
N
N
626.3, E
65.1
691.4( c
a�
E
t
�a
7.4� Q
0.7E
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 168
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
250467
12/16/2021 072739
O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
(Continued)
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
Tota I :
250468
12/16/2021 065787
PATRIOT DIAMOND INC
A12784
TRAFIC - SUPPLIES/ 4" CORE BIT
TRAFIC - SUPPLIES/ 4" CORE BIT
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Freight
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Tota I :
250469
12/16/2021 073871
PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC
42349
INV 42349 EDMONDS PD - NOV 202
3 WEB -BASED PEP TESTS
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Total
250470
12/16/2021 069633
PET PROS
101
INV 101 - EDMONDS PD - HOBBS/A
DOG FOOD-HOBBS
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
DOG FOOD - ACE
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
Total
250471
12/16/2021 074793
PETDATA INC
10252
INV 10252 - NOV 2021 - EDMONDS
28 ONE YR PET LICENSES
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
1 REPLACEMENT TAG
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
Total
250472
12/16/2021 078781
PETTIT, MAUREEN C
10057 CLOGGING
10057 CLOGGING CLASS INSTRUC
10057 CLOGGING CLASS INSTRUC
8.6.a
Page: 22
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 169
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250472 12/16/2021 078781 PETTIT, MAUREEN C (Continued)
250473 12/16/2021 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870
250474 12/16/2021 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 20220026
250475 12/16/2021 077422 RED ZONE ROBOTICS
250476 12/16/2021 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
I N V-14733
3-0197-0800478
3-0197-0800897
3-0197-0801132
PO # Description/Account
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total :
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
Total
WWTP: 2022 OPERATING PERMIT 1
2022 OPERATING PERMIT FEES & i
423.000.76.535.80.41.50
Total
PACP CODING OF LEGACY MEDIA
PACP CODING OF LEGACY MEDIA
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
Total
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
8.6.a
Page: 23
Amoun
249.1 E y
249.1E E
�a
a
d
L
4,011.5E
4,011.5E
N
U
a�
t
29,306.4�
29,306.45 ,E
�a
U
4-
0
2,547.7, >
2,547.7: a
a
Q
T
244.9E N
CD
N
39.5E
150.4E
150.4E a0i
E
t
150.4.E
150.4.E Q
150.4.E
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 170
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 24
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250476
12/16/2021 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
(Continued)
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ;
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
265.7-
3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
71.6E
Tota I :
1,374.1(
250477
12/16/2021 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC
5-034339
UNIT 94 - BATTERY
UNIT 94 - BATTERY
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
100.81
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4�
5-034405
UNIT 20 - BATTERY
UNIT 20 - BATTERY
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
235.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
24.5z
Total :
371.8'
250478
12/16/2021 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL
2488989
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
2,317.6(
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
241.01'
Total :
2,558.6:
250479
12/16/2021 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC
18001844
WWTP: 5% DUE ACCEPT SD SCRE
5% DUE ACCEPT SD SCREW FEED
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
3,017.5(
Total:
3,017.5(
250480
12/16/2021 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
S3-6878580
UNIT 28 - PARTS
UNIT 28 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
225.3 j
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 171
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250480 12/16/2021 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC (Continued)
250481 12/16/2021 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC
250482 12/16/2021 036955 SKY NURSERY
250483 12/16/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
PO # Description/Account
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total :
14-421710
UNIT 125 - PARTS/ WINCH & GRAB
UNIT 125 - PARTS/ WINCH & GRAB
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
1914061
PM: MULCH
PM: MULCH
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
Total
200663953
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201054327
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201103561
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201501277
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
201557303
CEMETERY BUILDING
CEMETERY BUILDING
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
201790003
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
8.6.a
Page: 25
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 172
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250483 12/16/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
202139655
202161535
202356739
205184385
205307580
221593742
222398059
222704272
250484 12/16/2021 072776 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DIST 5740
250485 12/16/2021 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
80480
8.6.a
Page: 26
PO # Description/Account Amoun
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 (D
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
33.7< a
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
3
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
85.6z
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
33.7'
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N
t
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
26.3"
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
p
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
248.3< �a
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
o
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
a
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
116.6" Q
SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY
.r
22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet -
0.4
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
101.6� 'ro
WWTP:11/3-12/7/21 FLOWMETER
C�
11/3-12/7/21 FLOWMETER 1000541
N
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
20.0< E
Total :
1,035.2z
STORM - RAINGARDEN MAINTENAI
STORM - RAINGARDEN MAINTENAI
E
E
422.000.72.531.40.48.00
2,970.8E
Total :
2,970.81
a
PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES
PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
628.0(
ILLEGAL DUMP FEES
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 173
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250485
12/16/2021 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
5.0(
Tota I :
633.0(
250486
12/16/2021 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
November 2021
Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.237.140
146.6'
Total :
146.6:
250487
12/16/2021 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103587
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,141.0,
Total:
1,141.01,
250488
12/16/2021 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
L145444
11-2021 AUDIT FEES
11-2021 Audit Fees
001.000.39.514.20.41.50
303.0E
11-2021 Audit Fees
111.000.68.543.30.41.50
30.3"
11-2021 Audit Fees
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
90.91
11-2021 Audit Fees
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
90.91
11-2021 Audit Fees
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
90.91
Total :
606.1:
250489
12/16/2021 071585 STERICYCLE INC
3005805173
INV 3005808173 - CUST 6076358 - E
2 MED BOX DISPOSAL
001.000.41.521.80.41.00
96.7<
Total :
96.7;
250490
12/16/2021 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
180021580-00
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ BOLTS, WAS
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ BOLTS, WAS
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
898.0�
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 174
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250490 12/16/2021 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
250491 12/16/2021 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA
250492 12/16/2021 027269 THE PART WORKS INC
250493 12/16/2021 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 28
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
N
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
93.3�
180021775-00
STORM - FIRST AID SUPPLIES
E
STORM - FIRST AID SUPPLIES
ca
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
a
100.8E
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
10.4E
180022035-00
ROADWAY - MARKING PAINT (RETI
ROADWAY - MARKING PAINT (RETI
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
-123.4E
10.4% Sales Tax
t
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
-12.8'
Total:
966.5'
95539
CITY LOGO CLOTHING FOR BUILD
o
City Logo Clothing for Building
'@
001.000.62.524.20.24.00
495.7( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.62.524.20.24.00
51.5E Q
Total :
547.2E
INV74785
F.A.C. - PARTS
T
N
F.A.C. - PARTS
N
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
258.3,
Freight
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.3E 'ca
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
27.9z c
Total:
296.61 E
t
133330
MONTH BASE CHARGE FOR HP PA
�a
Month Base Charge for HP Pagewide
Q
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 175.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 18.2(
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 175
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
250493 12/16/2021 072649 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY (Continued)
250494 12/16/2021 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION 3006307535
250495 12/16/2021 070040 TOTAL RECLAIM INC
INV-006569
250496 12/16/2021 075141 TREATMENT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1787
250497 12/16/2021 070767 UNITED RENTALS NW INC 195966501-002
199943492-001
250498 12/16/2021 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 1110146
8.6.a
Page: 29
Description/Account Amoun
Total :
193.2(
MUSEUM - SERVICE OIL & GREASE
E
E
MUSEUM - SERVICE OIL & GREASE
�a
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
414.9,
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
43.11
Total :
458.05
�a
FAC MAINT - RECYCLING OF CITYV
FAC MAINT - RECYCLING OF CITYV
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
t
1,287.1E
Total :
1,287.1E ,E
M
WWTP: PO 513 ACTIVATED CARBC
PO 513 ACTIVATED CARBON
,U
0
423.000.76.535.80.31.56
4,851.0( >
Freight
o
423.000.76.535.80.31.56
663.0( a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
423.000.76.535.80.31.56
573.4E r
Total :
6,087.4E CD
r-
WWTP: 8/12-9/9/21 CRANE RENTAL
8/12-9/9/21 CRANE RENTAL
N
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
894.0( •E
10.4% Sales Tax
ea
U
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
92.9E
PM: BOOM RENTAL
PM: BOOM RENTAL
E
t
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
2,905.0( um
10.4% Sales Tax
V
Q
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
302.1 ,
Total : 4,194.1(
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 176
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250498 12/16/2021 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR (Continued)
250499 12/16/2021 075496 VALERIE INC
12132021
250500 12/16/2021 075762 VECA ELECTRIC & TECHNOLOGIES 108843REV
250501 12/16/2021 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
109050
9894036727
250502 12/16/2021 067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 62287
8.6.a
Page: 30
PO # Description/Account Amoun
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
(D
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
90.2E E
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
a
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
90.2E
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
3
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
92.9E
Total:
273.4f
HOLIDAY MARKET MANAGEMENT
N
HOLIDAY MARKET MANAGEMENT
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
5,000.0(
Total :
5,000.0( •E
P&R: HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE C,
P&R: HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE C,
o
001.000.63.557.20.41.00
@
5,900.0( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.63.557.20.41.00
613.6( Q
INV 109050 - EDMONDS PD
INSTALL CAT6 CABLES - RECORDS
N
001.000.41.521.11.48.00
1,399.0(
CD
10.4% Sales Tax
T-
N
001.000.41.521.11.48.00
145.5(
N
Total:
83058.1(
E
C/A 442201730-00001
U
iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
35.1 ,
E
Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station
t
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
26.8E
M
Total
PUBLIC WORKS - ANNUAL FIRE SF
PUBLIC WORKS - ANNUAL FIRE SF
001.000.66.518.30.41.00 914.7(
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 177
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 31
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250502
12/16/2021 067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
95.1
62288
PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE - ANNUA
PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE - ANNUA
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
1,100.2E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
114.4<
Total :
2,224.51
250503
12/16/2021 073832 WA ST DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SVCS
9512260
WWTP: 11/2021 C511 PROJECT MG
11/2021 C511 PROJECT MGMT
423.100.76.594.39.41.00
49,496.1 ,
Total:
49,496.1,
250504
12/16/2021 045515 WABO
6917
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - JURISDI
Membership Renewal - Jurisdictional
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
95.0(
Total :
95.0(
250505
12/16/2021 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS
121-729
PM: TREE REMOVAL: FISH HATCHE
PM: TREE REMOVAL: FISH HATCHE
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
750.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
78.0(
Total :
828.0(
250506
12/16/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
12560879
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
176.6(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
18.3
Total :
194.91
250507
12/16/2021 078768 WEAPON OUTFITTERS
1002-INV
1002-INV - EDMONDS PD - SWAT
OPS CORE HEADSETS
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 178
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 32
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250507
12/16/2021 078768 WEAPON OUTFITTERS
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
3,357.8(
HELMET MOUNT RAIL KITS
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
298.8E
HEADSET CABLING
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
436.3E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
425.6E
Total :
4,518.7:
250508
12/16/2021 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
8158
WWTP: PO 700 PRINTED ENVELOF
PO 700 PRINTED ENVELOPES
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
228.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
23.7-
Total :
251.71
250509
12/16/2021 071467 WEST COAST PET MEMORIAL
WA70014-1-0051
WA70014-1-0051 - EDMONDS PD
DISPOSAL OF 2 ANIMAL REMAINS
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
26.6(
Tota I :
26.6(
250510
12/16/2021 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR
9296217
PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE
PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
103.9f
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
10.8-
Total :
114.7E
250511
12/16/2021 078773 ZERO9 HOLSTERS
3323
INV 3323 - EDMONDS PD
4 RADIO HOLSTERS - INVENTORY
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
183.8(
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
12.5(
Total :
196.3(
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 179
vchlist
12/15/2021 2:36:27PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.a
Page: 33
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250512 12/16/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
253-011-1177
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
(D
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
6.4, E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
a
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
24.4<
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
3
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
24.4<
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
�a
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
24.4< Y
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
24.4'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
E
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
24.41 'M
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
U
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION
o
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
138.6E
425-775-7865
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
o
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI
a
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
71.6� Q
425-776-2742
LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACC[
r
LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACC
N
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
26.4,
425-776-5316
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
N
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
112.9" .
Total:
478.2E u
109 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
260,467.8( r-
E
109 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
260,467.8(
�a
a
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 180
8.6.b
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun vi
250513
12/20/2021 064399 ALPHAGRAPHICS
A423257
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION CALE
y
2022 Historical Preservation Calenda
E
014.000.62.557.20.49.00
5,223.81 a
10.4% Sales Tax
a�
014.000.62.557.20.49.00
L
Total:
5,767.1 ° -o
c
250514
12/22/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
INV-2-14925
INV-2-14925 - EDMONDS PD - INVE
�a
N
EPD SHOULDER PATCH STOCK
U
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
570.0( t
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
57.51
INV-2-15090
INV-2-15090 - EDMONDS PD - WEIE
BALLISTIC VEST
p
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0( �a
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
p
L
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0( 0-
TRAUMA PLATE
Q
.r
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
26.0(
T
10.1 % Sales Tax
N
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
108.9� N
Total :
1,815.5E 04
250515
12/22/2021 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-92736
INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 1A0144
N
E
INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 1 A01 44
2
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
170.0( U
15-92852
INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 8Z1184:
INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 8Z1184:
E
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
170.0(
15-92923
INTERPRETER PUNJABI 1A069412£
+°
INTERPRETER PUNJABI 1A069412£
Q
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
170.0(
Total:
510.0(
250516
12/22/2021 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
52535
MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 181
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250516
12/22/2021 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
(Continued)
MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI
(D
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
90.0( E,
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
9.3E
52546
LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERV
3
LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERV
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
99.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Y
10.3(
52575
PUBLIC WORKS - PEST CONTROL
PUBLIC WORKS - PEST CONTROL
E
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
15.6( o
Total:
374.2E
0
250517
12/22/2021 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC
80503
YOST POOL - FIRE ALARM EQUIPM
a
YOST POOL - FIRE ALARM EQUIPM
Q'
Q
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7,053.8" "
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
733.6( N
Total:
7,787.4: cv
250518
12/22/2021 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
143158437
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
N
E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
ca
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
50.9z
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
c
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
50.9z E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
45.8z +°
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
Q
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
58.5E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
25.4,
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 182
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250518 12/22/2021 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
22.9,
143158438
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
a
32.9<
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
32.9<
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
29.6z N
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
37.8 ,
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
E
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
14.8" o
143202184
FIRE ALARM MONITORING - SNOIS
�a
Fire Alarm Monitoring - Snolsle Librar
o
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
51.7E a
143202185
ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII
Q
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
.r
T
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
30.0E N
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
04
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
30.0E 04
143202186
ALARM MONITORING - LIBRARY, 6E
N
ALARM MONITORING FOR Sno Isle
E
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
185.3" u
143202187
ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII
};
ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
34.1 , E
143202188
ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII
ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 78.3' Q
143202189 ALARM MONITORING FOR MUSEUI
ALARM MONITORING FOR Museum
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 129.0E
143202190 ALARM MONITORING WASTEWATE
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 183
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 4
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250518 12/22/2021 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
(Continued)
ALARM MONITORING Wastewater T
m
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
50.7( E
143202191
ALARM MONITORING FOR PUBLIC
a
ALARM MONITORING FOR Public &
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
112.5( .3
143202192
ALARM MONITORING - F.S. #17, SN
Fire Inspection - Sno Isle 650 Main Si
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
315.7,
Fire Inspection - Historical Museum,
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
35.0,
Fire Inspection - Public Safety, 250
E
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Fire Inspection - Fire Station #17, 27E
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
55.4; o
143202811
ALARM MONITORING ANDERSON (
�a
ALARM MONITORING FRANCES AN
o
L
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
287.8" a
143202812
FIRE ALARM INSPECTION ANDERS
Q
Fire Inspection FRANCES ANDERSC
T
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
277.9E N
Total :
2,246.6( N
N
250519 12/22/2021 078469 AGUIRRE, RAUL
67324
INTERPRETER SPANISH 7Z032450,
N
INTERPRETER SPANISH 7Z032450,
E
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( E
68407
INTERPRETER SPANISH XZ032910,
U
INTERPRETER SPANISH XZ0329101
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
a�
150.0( E
Total:
250.0(
�a
250520 12/22/2021 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
10897
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
152,928.0(
Total :
152,928.0(
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 184
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 5
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250521 12/22/2021 071634 ALLSTREAM
17940129
C/A 768328
PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service
(D
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
1,351.5 � E
Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929;
a
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
10.&
Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines
3
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
10.81'
Total:
1,373Z
250522 12/22/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
656000154933
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
N
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
63.4,
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
6.5� U
656000157940
WWTP: 12/15/21 UNIFORMS,TOWE
p
Mats/Towels $47.88 + $4.99 tax = $5
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
52.8 � p
3 lab coats @ $17.each = $0.51 + tax
a
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
1.4' Q
656000157945
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
63.4, N
10.4% Sales Tax
cv
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
6.5� N
656000157947
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
E
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
2
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
27.9"
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
2.9( E
656000159907
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
U
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6- Q
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1-
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1-
Page:
5
Packet Pg. 185
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 6
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250522
12/22/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1' E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
a
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
3
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.3< Y
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6 ,
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6, 'M
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6 1 O
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6, o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.3< Q
656000159916
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
r
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
N
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
N
9.2� N
FLEET DIVISION MATS
04
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
1.5E U
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.4-
Total:
291.9E E
250523
12/22/2021 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC
126106
PUBLIC SAFETY - ALERTON & BOIL
fd
PUBLIC SAFETY - ALERTON & BOIL
Q
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
2,364.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
245.8E
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 186
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 7
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250523
12/22/2021 064807 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC
(Continued)
Total :
2,609.8E
250524
12/22/2021 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY
67842
INT SPANISH 1A0496676
E
E
INT SPANISH 1A0496676
�a
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0(
67883
INT SPANISH 1A0582645
=
INT SPANISH 1A0582645
3
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( c
68428
INTERPRETER SPANISH 1A036928!
N
INTERPRETER SPANISH 1A03692&
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0(
Total:
300.0(
E
250525
12/22/2021 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
0015009
WWTP: 10/23-11/26/21 PROF SERA
f°
10/23-11/26/21 PROF SERVICES
.-
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
7,577.0( o
Total:
7,577.0( o
L
250526
12/22/2021 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
22579
EOFB.SERVICES THRU 12/4/21CL
a
EOFB.SERVICES THRU 12/4/21
Q
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
7,737.5( r
Total :
7,737.5( N
N
250527
12/22/2021 064587 BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETE PUMPIN(
IN109189
WWTP: PO 688 DIVERSION Y VALV
N
PO 688 DIVERSION Y VALVE
N
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
2,072.7< .E
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
37.2, };
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
219.4, E
Total:
2,329.4'
250528
12/22/2021 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J
10066 TRAINING
10066 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTF
Q
10066 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTF
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
532.5(
Total:
532.5(
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 187
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250529 12/22/2021 077166 CADENA, MICHAEL
250530 12/22/2021 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
250531 12/22/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 8
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
05152021
INT SPANISH 1 A01 34720
INT SPANISH 1 A01 34720
(D
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( E,
12132021
INT SPANISH 1A0715266
a
INT SPANISH 1A0715266
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( .3
Total :
200.0(
c
5804655
STREET - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BIN[
N
STREET - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BIN[
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
186.1 £ t
10.1 % Sales Tax
U
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
18.8( •�
5805893
STREET - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BIN[
U
STREET - ASPHALT, ASPHALT BIN[
o
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
220.4E '@
9.8% Sales Tax
o
125.000.68.542.61.31.00
21.6' m
Total :
447.0E Q
27787772
CANON 2501
N
contract charge 12/1-12/31 /2021-
N
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
26.4z N
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
2.7E E
27787775
P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC'
ea
P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC'
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
32.3z c
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
3.3E
27787776
PM: IRC2501F COPIER CONTRACT i
PARK MAINT IRC2501F COPIER COI
Q
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
26.4z
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 2.7E
27787777 FLEET COPIER -
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 188
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250531 12/22/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 9
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
Fleet Copier-
(D
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
32.3, E,
10.4% Sales Tax
a
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
3.3E
27787778
CONTRACT/METER CHARGES-
3
contract/meter charges-
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
13.3,
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
Y
1.3�
27787779
COUNCIL CANON COPIER LEASE E
Monthly contract charge-
E
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
2.7E o
27787781
INV 27787781 - EDMONDS PD
�a
12/21 CONTRACT - WXD01878
0
L
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
185.7z 0-
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
19.3, r
27787782
WATER SEWER COPIER-
N
Water Sewer Copier-
cN.i
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
54.7'
Water Sewer Copier-
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
54.7z .
10.4% Sales Tax
ea
U
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
5.7( };
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
5.6£ t
27787783
PW ADMIN COPIER
PW Office Copier for-
Q
001.000.65.518.20.45.00
66.1E
PW Office Copier for-
111.000.68.542.90.45.00
37.4�
PW Office Copier for -
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 189
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250531 12/22/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 10
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
N
422.000.72.531.90.45.00
37.4� y
PW Office Copier for-
E
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
26.4E a
PW Office Copier for-
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
26.4E .3
PW Office Copier for-
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
26.4E
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.65.518.20.45.00
6.8£ u
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.45.00
3.9( E
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.45.00
_M
2.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
o
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
2.7E
10.4% Sales Tax
o
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
2.7E a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
111.000.68.542.90.45.00
3.9( r
27787784
INV 27787784 - EDMONDS PD
N
12/21 CONTRACT - FAXBOARD-
N
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
36.0, c4
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
3.7E .
27787787
COPIERS DECEMBER
U
COPIERS DECEMBER
};
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
212.5E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
t
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
22.1
27787788
INV 27787788 EDMONDS PD
Q
12/21 CONTRACT - 3AP01257
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 175.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.6(
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 190
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 11
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250531
12/22/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Continued)
12/21 CONTRACT - 3AP01253
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
175.9E E
27787790
P&R C5750 COPIER: CONTRACT OE
a
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
23.6" .3
P&R C5750 Copier: Contract Number
M
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
227.0,
27787792
C/A 572105-1 CONTRACT# 06619
Finance dept copier contract charge
U
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
227.0z
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
27787793
CONTRACT/METER CHARGES
contract meter charges-
o
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
302.& �a
10.4% Sales Tax
o
L
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
31.4E a
Total :
2,241.61 Q
250532
12/22/2021 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC
12
STATE LOBBYIST DECEMBER 2021
N
STATE LOBBYIST DECEMBER 2021
N
N
001.000.61.511.70.41.00
3,750.0( N
Total:
3,750.0( y
E
250533
12/22/2021 075892 CASCADIAART MUSEUM
LTAC 12202021
LTAC TOURISM PROMOTION AWAF
2
LTAC TOURISM PROMOTION AWAF
U
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
6,000.0( c
Total:
6,000.0( E
t
250534
12/22/2021 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
CG105598
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
U
�a
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
250.0,
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
26.0(
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 191
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
250534 12/22/2021 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued)
250535 12/22/2021 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS INV-55
250536 12/22/2021 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS
250537 12/22/2021 077126 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP
250538 12/22/2021 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC
250539 12/22/2021 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
INV-54
Description/Account
Total ;
E21 FD.RIGHT OF WAY ENG2021-05
E21 FD.RIGHT OF WAY ENG2021-05
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
Total
E21 FD.RIGHT OF WAY ENG2021-05
E21 FD.RIGHT OF WAY ENG2021-05
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
Total
3092506 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
001.000.23.512.50.41.00
Tota I :
RO46489 UNIT 50 - DEDUCTIBLE TO REPAIR
UNIT 50 - DEDUCTIBLE TO REPAIR
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
Total
21-4129 INV 21-4129 - EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-9388 MEHL
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-13077 MEF
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 29744 MEHL
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-14047 MEF
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-10645 TRY
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-14237
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-15511 MEH
8.6.b
Page: 12
Amoun
276.0:
C
m
E
�a
150.0(
150.0( .-
3
c
�a
N
150.0(
150.0( t
E
M
5,632.6, ,-
5,632.6,
�a
0
a
a
1,000.0( Q
1,000.0( r
N
N
N
N
18.0( N
E
100.8( 2
50.4(
E
36.0( U
M
72.0( Q
50.4(
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 192
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250539 12/22/2021 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
250540 12/22/2021 064640 DMCMA
250541 12/22/2021 061384 DRIFTWOOD PLAYERS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
21-4131
12212021
12212021-2
II1L\0]:11i1rTiT 00A
250542 12/22/2021 076790 DUNGENESS CONSTRUCTION CORP EOFB.Pmt 3
250543 12/22/2021 078791 EDM ARTS FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION 12222021
250544 12/22/2021 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
00010122256
PO # Description/Account
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 21-18973 MEF
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
TRANSCRIPTION CS 19256 MEHL
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 11/23 & 1,
city council minutes 11/23 & 12/7
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Total
DMCMA DUES - UM
DMCMA DUES - UM
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
DMCMA-JE
DMCMA-JE
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
Total
TPA DRIFTWOOD
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI`
123.000.64.573.20.41.40
Total
EOFB.PMT 3 THRU 11/30/21
EOFB.PMT 3 THRU 11/30/21
422.000.72.594.31.65.20
EOFB.Ret 3
422.000.223.400
Total
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Total
PM SUPPLIES: AMP BLADE, OIL
8.6.b
Page: 13
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 193
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250544 12/22/2021 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
250545 12/22/2021 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ARTS EDUCATION
250546 12/22/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 2723
2725
2726
2733
2737
PO # Description/Account
PM SUPPLIES: AMP BLADE, OIL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
WE SPEAK STUDENT WORKSHOP;
WE SPEAK STUDENT WORKSHOP;
117.300.64.573.20.41.00
Total
PM: SLUG KILLER
PM: SLUG KILLER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: THERMOMETER, BATTERY
PM: THERMOMETER, BATTERY
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: BRAKE CLEANER, STAKE, STR
PM: BRAKE CLEANER, STAKE, STR
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: PAINT CAN
PM: PAINT CAN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: STRETCH CORDS
PM: STRETCH CORDS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
8.6.b
Page: 14
Amoun
m
18.9-, E
�a
a
L
20.9d '3
c
�a
1,000.0( U
1,000.0( t
E
2
U
39.9� o
�a
4.1 E o
a
a
Q
22.5f "
N
2.3E N
N
N
13.9; E
1.4E
c
a�
E
2.5�
ca
0.2, Q
13.9E
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 194
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 15
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250546 12/22/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1.4.'
Total:
102.75 E
250547 12/22/2021 060983 EDMONDS SO SNO CO HISTORICAL
12/20/2021 TPA
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI`
�a
Q-
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI`
123.000.64.573.20.41.40
750.0(
Total:
750.0(
�a
250548 12/22/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
1-00025
WILLOW CREEK HATCHERY/ METI
WILLOW CREEK HATCHERY WATE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
t
442.3" u
1-00575
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME-
E
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME-
f6
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
132.4f o
1-00825
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
>
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
806.1 a
1-00875
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST/ METER 11
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 11
Q
--
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z N
1-00935
WATERFRONT CENTER 220 RAILRi
N
WATERFRONT CENTER 220 RAILR,
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
119.1
1-02125
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-03710
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST/ METER'
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST/ METER'
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z t
1-03900
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METE
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METE
Q
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-05125
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 195
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250548 12/22/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 16
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
1-05285
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.91
a
1-05340
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / METE
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-05650
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71.
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71.
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-05675
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP /
t
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP /
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,142.5,
1-05700
SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER
U
SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER
p
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
�a
1-09650
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST/ METER i
o
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER i
a
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
Q
1-09800
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[
.r
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[
04
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9,
N
1-10778
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75'
04
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75'
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
198.1
E
1-10780
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER!
@
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER!
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
58.6(
1-16130
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI
E
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-16300
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / MET[
Q
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / MET[
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z
1-16420
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6'
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6'
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 196
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 17
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250548 12/22/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9,
1-16450
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 1
E
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 1
ca
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
a
102.5(
1-16630
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST/ METER'
3
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METER'
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
63.2.
1-17475
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / MET[
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / MET[
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z t
1-19950
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
114.2( Z
1-36255
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METE
p
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
53.9z o
Total:
L
4,042.41 a
Q
250549 12/22/2021 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR
67323
INT SPANISH 1 A0436622
INT SPANISH 1A0436622
N
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0( N
Total:
100.0( N
250550 12/22/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
AR208110
5750 COPIER METER OVERAGE
E
bw meter overage 11/16 - 12/15/2021
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
3.5,
bw meter overage 11/16 - 12/15/2021
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
3.5,
bw meter overage 11/16 - 12/15/2021
t
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
3.5<
clr meter overage 11/6-12/15/2021
Q
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
16.7<
dr meter overage 11/6-12/15/2021
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
16.7'
dr meter overage 11/6-12/15/2021
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 197
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250550 12/22/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued)
AR208111
AR208135
AR208136
AR208562
250551 12/22/2021 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0969240
8.6.b
Page: 18
PO # Description/Account Amoun
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
16.61
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
2.1' a
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
2.1 - 3
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
2.0E CM
WWTP:11/16-12/15/21 COPIES CHC
Y
11/16-12/15/21 Contract overage cha
U
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
69.4E
10.4% Sales Tax
E
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
CUST# MK5533 C57501 3AP07496 C
Meter charges 11/16/21 - 12/15/21 BE
o
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
10.6E Ta
Meter charges 11/16/21 - 12/15/21 C(
o
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
24.7( a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
3.6E r
P&R COPIER USAGE: C57501
N
P&R COPIER USAGE: C57501: accot
N
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
28.0E N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
2.9, .
ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02
U
Maintenance 12/21/21 - 01/20/22 Car
};
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
307.2(
10.4% Sales Tax
E
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
t
31.9E 0
Total :
552.8F
a
WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES
WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
2,651.5,
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 198
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250551 12/22/2021 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued)
250552 12/22/2021 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 171553
250553 12/22/2021 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA
10017 TAI CHI
10022 TAI CHI
10024 QIGONG
250554 12/22/2021 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 1193230
250555 12/22/2021 012560 HACH COMPANY
12785441
12785533
PO # Description/Account
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total :
DEC-2021 SUPPORT SERVICES
Dec-2021 Support Services
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Total
10017 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
10017 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
10022 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
10022 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
10024 QIGONG INSTRUCTION
10024 QIGONG INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
OLD PW - SECURITY
OLD PW - SECURITY
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
WWTP: PO 697 FILTER FOR DQ3"
PO 697 FILTER FOR DQ3 WATER S'
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: PO 713 SULFERIC ACIDE &
PO 713 SULFERIC ACIDE & FILTER
8.6.b
Page: 19
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 199
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 20
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250555
12/22/2021 012560
HACH COMPANY
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
841.0(
Freight
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
128.01 a
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
100.7E .3
12790186
WWTP: PO 703 0.22UM FILTER FO
PO 703 0.22UM FILTER FOR DQ3 V
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
230.0( Y
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
a�
23.9,
Total:
1,577.6E E
250556
12/22/2021 074804
HARLES, JANINE
284606
PHOTOGRAPHY & INSTAGRAM SEI
PHOTOGRAPHY & INSTAGRAM SEI
o
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
300.0( @
Total:
300.0( o
L
250557
12/22/2021 074966
HIATT CONSULTING LLC
2019-288
TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI
Q
TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI
Q
--
120.000.31.575.42.41.00
1,874.0( N
Total :
1,874.0( N
250558
12/22/2021 061013
HONEY BUCKET
0552451403
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
N
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
644.9�
0552451404
YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET
YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
439.6(
0552451405
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
346.0( Q
0552451406
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
120.4.E
0552451407
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 200
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250558 12/22/2021 061013 HONEY BUCKET
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
0552451408
0552451409
250559 12/22/2021 076159 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MGMT SVCS 50361 Edmonds-2
50361 Edmonds-3
50361-3
53061 Edmonds-1
250560 12/22/2021 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3529181
8.6.b
Page: 21
PO # Description/Account Amoun
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
120.4.E
E
WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I
a
WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
221.6E
.3
MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED
MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONEI
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
1,514.1,
Y
Total:
3,407.2E
u
t
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
E
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
2,804.8(
2
U
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
-
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
'@
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
2,639.4(
o
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
a
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
C'
Q
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
N
125.000.68.542.30.41.00
1,301.2,
N
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
N
126.000.68.542.30.41.00
973.9,
N
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
E
E21CA CONSULTING SERVICES
2
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
2,804.8(
Total:
10,888.4(
t
WWTP: ACRYLIC SCREEN (PART C
ACRYLIC SCREEN (PART OF JK-S F
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 239.3: Q
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 24.8�
Total : 264.2:
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 201
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250561 12/22/2021 072528 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SERVICES 67140
250562 12/22/2021 076917 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC W3Y0200008
250563 12/22/2021 078794 JR SMOOTS CONSULTING LLC
250564 12/22/2021 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC
250565 12/22/2021 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING
250566 12/22/2021 078470 LEVESON, NANCYANN
JRSC2021-01
9763
4726479
60466
250567 12/22/2021 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER January 2022
PO # Description/Account
INT SPANISH CR27661 (HUGHES)
INT SPANISH CR27661 (HUGHES)
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total
WWTP: PROF SERVICES THRU 11t
PROF SERVICES THRU 11/26/21
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
MICROSOFT ACCESS DATABASE P
MICROSOFT ACCESS DATABASE P
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Total
UNIT 109 - PARTS/ SWITCH
UNIT 109 - PARTS/ SWITCH
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
SHREDDING NOVEMBER 21
SHREDDING NOVEMBER 21
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
Total
INT SPANISH 8ZO990564
INT SPANISH 8ZO990564
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total
JANUARY 2022 PREMIUMS
January 2022 Premiums
811.000.231.550
8.6.b
Page: 22
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 202
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
250567 12/22/2021 075159 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER (Continued)
250568 12/22/2021 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC DEC-2021
250569 12/22/2021 078789 LIVE IN LANGUAGES LTD
250570 12/22/2021 078798 LUTTRELL, MEGAN
250571 12/22/2021 060909 MACHADO, DAVID L
250572 12/22/2021 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
250573 12/22/2021 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS
12222021
12212021
MACHADO NOV 2021
Description/Account
12-2021 LEGALS FEES
12-2021 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
Total
Total :
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Total
HOLIDAY TROLLEY - CANDY CANE;
HOLIDAY TROLLEY - CANDY CANE;
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
Total
MACHADO EXP CLAIM - USE OF FC
PER DIEM 11/29-12/3 CONNECTICU
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
Total
364012 PM: PA SYSTEM RENTAL
PM: PA SYSTEM RENTAL
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
364075 PM: SERVICE KIT, STOP BUFFER,
PM: SERVICE KIT, STOP BUFFER,
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
26499 MUSEUM - REPAIRED ROOF
MUSEUM - REPAIRED ROOF
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
8.6.b
Page: 23
Amoun
13,070.0:
C
m
E
�a
51,878.0(
51,878.0( .3
c
�a
N
2,500.0(
2,500.0( t
U
E
M
15.0( ,�
15.0( O
�a
0
a
a
264.5( Q
264.5( r
N
N
N
N
71.5( N
E
7.4z 2
107.61 Q
!• 1111l(
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 203
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250573 12/22/2021 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS
250574 12/22/2021 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC
250575 12/22/2021 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
250576 12/22/2021 078404 NISHIYAMA, YURI
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 24
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
10.4% Sales Tax
(D
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
59.2E E,
Total:
629.2f a
1103P2627
UNIT 11 - PARTS/ CORE (RETURNE
UNIT 11 - PARTS/ CORE (RETURNE
3
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-387.6E
10.4% Sales Tax
N
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-40.3,
1103P3034
UNIT 66 - PARTS/ SENSOR
UNIT 66 - PARTS/ SENSOR
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
273.0E •�
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
26.7E p
1103P3123
UNIT 66 - PARTS/ HEATER
'@
UNIT 66 - PARTS/ HEATER
0
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
163.9E a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
17.0( "
Total:
52.8f
0638149-IN
STORM - SUPPLIES/ VESTS
N
N
N
STORM - SUPPLIES/ VESTS
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
228.2( E
10.4% Sales Tax
M
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
23.7'
Total:
251.9: c
a)
10124 9901 MAHJONG
10124 9901 MAHJONG CLASS INST
10124 MAHJONG CLASS INSTRUCT
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
66.0( Q
9901 MAHJONG CLASS INSTRUCTI
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
66.0(
Total :
132.0(
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 204
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
250577 12/22/2021 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S011217120.008
250578 12/22/2021 026015 OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE
250579 12/22/2021 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC
S011217120.009
TPA OBT
PO # Description/Account
WWTP: PO 670 POWERFLEXARCF
PO 670 POWERFLEX ARCHITECTU
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
WWTP: PO 670 BEZEL KIT FOR PO'
PO 670 BEZEL KIT FOR POWERFL
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI`
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI`
123.000.64.573.20.41.40
Total
053242 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
250580 12/22/2021 077808 OSBORN CONSULTING INC 6716
250581 12/22/2021 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
E21 FD.SERVICES 11/30/21
E21FD.SERVICES 11/30/21
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
00104478 UNIT 66 - PARTS/ BAND
UNIT 66 - PARTS/ BAND
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
8.6.b
Page: 25
Amoun
357.7, E
�a
a
37.2 -
L
3
192.7E
20.0E U
607.7(
E
2
U
2,600.0( p
2,600.0(
0
a
a
Q
715.4, "
N
74.4( N
789.8s N
N
E
4,159.7E
4,159.7E
a�
E
t
�a
252.5' Q
14.9'
27.8"
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 205
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 26
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250581
12/22/2021 002203
002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY (Continued)
Total :
295.2E
250582
12/22/2021 027450
PAWS
NOV 2021
NOV 2021 - EDMONDS PD
4 ANIMALS X $207 -$35 CREDIT
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
793.0(
Total :
793.0(
250583
12/22/2021 070431
PITNEYBOWES EASYPERMIT POSTAGE 12212021
BULK MAIL
bulk mail
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
9,744.0(
Total:
9,744.0(
250584
12/22/2021 071811
PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
1119629
STREET - SHIPPING FOR PED BUT
STREET - SHIPPING FOR PED BUT
111.000.68.542.90.49.00
29.1,
1119715
STREET - SHIPPING FOR PED BUT
STREET - SHIPPING FOR PED BUT
111.000.68.542.90.49.00
22.0z
Total:
51.21
250585
12/22/2021 078792
PP -WA LLC PILCHUCK VET HOSP
749454
INV 749454 - CUST 293538 - EDMOI
ACE - EMERGENCY VET VISIT
001.000.41.521.26.41.00
1,419.0E
Total:
1,419.0E
250586
12/22/2021 078733
QUIET THYME WELLNESS
10050 YOGA
10050 YOGA INSTRUCTION
10050 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
33.6(
Total :
33.6(
250587
12/22/2021 078786
QUIET THYME WELLNESS
12222021
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
10,000.0(
Total:
10,000.0(
250588
12/22/2021 062657
REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
0000055373
STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS
STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 206
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250588
12/22/2021 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
10,104.6z
Tota I :
10,104.61
250589
12/22/2021 067266 RODDA PAINTS
35237349
PM: PAINT
PM: PAINT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
112.0z
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.9E
Total :
123.0:
250590
12/22/2021 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC
5-034435
UNIT 28 - BATTERY
UNIT 28 - BATTERY
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
100.&
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4�
Total:
111.3:
250591
12/22/2021 077953 RUN FOR GOOD RACING COMPANY
12222021
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
10,000.0(
Total :
10,000.0(
250592
12/22/2021 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO
649876
INV 649876
223. AMMO
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
1,105.2z
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
114.9z
649896
INV 649896 - ACCT 1733 - EDMOND
GOLD DOT 9MM AMMO
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
1,830.6E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
190.3�
Total :
3,241.2:
250593
12/22/2021 072440 SCORDINO, JOE
32
SCORDINO REIMBURSEMENT THR
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 207
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250593 12/22/2021 072440 SCORDINO, JOE
250594 12/22/2021 076332 SCOTT, EMILY
250595 12/22/2021 077069 SEMACONNECT INC
250596 12/22/2021 072214 SIGMA-ALDRICH INC
250597 12/22/2021 036955 SKY NURSERY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 28
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
vi
SCORDINO REIMBURSEMENT THR
(D
001.000.39.554.90.49.00
581.6E E,
Total:
581.6E a
12222021 DOWNTOWN
HOLIDAY CHEER AMBASSADOR D(
HOLIDAY CHEER AMBASSADOR D(
3
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
480.0(
12222021 UPTOWN
HOLIDAY CHEER AMBASSADOR OF
y
HOLIDAY CHEER AMBASSADOR OF
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
200.0(
Total:
680.0(
INVO027352
PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ MOUNTIP
f°
PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ MOUNTIP
U
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
o
30.0E '@
Freight
o
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
71.5 , a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.5E "
Total:
112.1: N
555381618
WWTP: ANIONS, SIMPLE NUTRIEN
N
N
ANIONS, SIMPLE NUTRIENTS, DEN
04
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
319.1( E
Freight
M
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
27.5( Z
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 36.0, 0
Total : 382.6' t
�a
T-1914061 PM: MULCH
PM: MULCH Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,040.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 108.1(
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 208
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250597 12/22/2021 036955 036955 SKY NURSERY
250598 12/22/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 29
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
Total :
1,148.1E
200326460
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
m
E
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
�a
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
17.7,
200496834
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
=
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
3
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
100.1.E
c
200650851
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
y
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
Y
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
21.2,
200651644
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
517.4(
200723021
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
o
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
'@
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
36.3E
o
201184538
HICKMAN PARK
a
HICKMAN PARK
Q-
Q
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201383270
CITY PARK GAZEBO
N
CITY PARK GAZEBO
c14
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
19.4E
N
N
201431236
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
E
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.4E
.m
201431244
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
21.7E
E
201441755
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
tea,
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 283.4( Q
202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 67.0E
202250635 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 209
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 30
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
250598 12/22/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
(Continued)
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
18.3, E
202289450
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
a
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
104.3E .3
202540647
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
�a
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
21.7E N
204425847
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
t
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
107.0E
220547574
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
108.3" o
221732084
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
�a
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
0
L
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
104.2E a
Total :
1,600.4' Q
250599 12/22/2021 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT
SHD-01 JAN-DEC 2021
HEALTH DISTRICT INTERLOCALAC
N
Per Capita contribution per Interlocal
N
001.000.39.562.00.41.50
21,450.0( N
Total:
21,450.0( N
E
250600 12/22/2021 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE
57528
STORM RENTAL HOUSE - GARAGE
STORM RENTAL HOUSE - GARAGE
422.000.72.531.20.48.00
787.1(
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.20.48.00
81.8(
Total:
868.9E
Q
250601 12/22/2021 077346 STRUM
9895 9894 UKULELE
9895 9894 UKULELE CLASS INSTRI
9895 UKULELE CLASS INSTRUCTIC
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
280.6z
9894 UKULELE CLASS INSTRUCTIC
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 210
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 31
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250601
12/22/2021 077346 STRUM
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
312.4(
Tota I :
593.0'
250602
12/22/2021 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC
10306
SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR DE(
SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR DE(
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
550.0(
Total :
550.0(
250603
12/22/2021 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
180025814-00
FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES
FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
25.6�
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
2.6,
Total :
28.3E
250604
12/22/2021 076823 TYR TACTICAL LLC
2069362
INV 2069362 - EDMONDS PD - GAG
SWAT BALLISTIC VEST
001.000.41.521.23.24.00
3,034.9z
Freight
001.000.41.521.23.24.00
29.2z
Total :
3,064.1 F
250605
12/22/2021 070774 ULINE INC
142445477
WWTP: PO 607 5-STEP & 7-STEP L,
PO 607 5-STEP & 7-STEP LADDER
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
1,936.0(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
1,275.3"
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
333.9E
Total :
3,545.25
250606
12/22/2021 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
253181
PARKS - DUMP FEES
PARKS - DUMP FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
480.0(
Tota I :
480.0(
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 211
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250607 12/22/2021 070767 UNITED RENTALS NW INC
250608 12/22/2021 071549 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC
250609 12/22/2021 064423 USA BLUE BOOK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 32
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
199943492-002
PM: BOOM RENTAL
PM: BOOM RENTAL
(D
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
595.1, E
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
61.9(
Total :
L
657.0, '3
49675259
WWTP:12/7/21 SOD. BISULFITE
c
12/7/21 SOD. BISULFITE
y
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
1,832.3,
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
190.5E
Total:
2,022.8E
735774
WATER - PARTS (DELIVERED WRO
o
WATER - PARTS (DELIVERED WRO
'@
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
287.9E o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
29.9E Q
769029
WATER - PARTS (WRONG PART DE
WATER - PARTS (WRONG PART DE
N
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
287.9E N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
N
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
-29.9E N
807397
WATER - PARTS/ SHUTOFF TOOL
E
WATER - PARTS/ SHUTOFF TOOL
ca
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
300.9E
Freight
c
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
17.4z E
E
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
33.1' ;3
813867 WWTP: PO 502 YELLOW, RED & BL Q
PO 502 YELLOW, RED & BLUE BUF
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 140.5E
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 44.9,
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 212
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.b
Page: 33
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
250609
12/22/2021 064423 USA BLUE BOOK
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
19.2�
Total:
556.2E
250610
12/22/2021 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
201135802
INV 201135802 EDMONDS PD - WEI
BLEA TUITION - CLASS 830
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
4,431.0(
Total :
4,431.0(
250611
12/22/2021 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
12569782
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
68.6
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.1
Total :
75.81
250612
12/22/2021 078302 WEBER, CAROL
11
VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI
VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
500.0(
Tota I :
500.0(
250613
12/22/2021 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
173795
WATER/ SEWER - JACKETS
WATER/ SEWER - JACKETS
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
110.4�
WATER/ SEWER - JACKETS
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
110.4,
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
10.81'
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
10.8,
Total :
242.61
250614
12/22/2021 078790 WILLARD, AMY
12222021
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
ERPF BUSINESS SUPPORT GRANT
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
10.000.0(
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 213
vchlist
12/22/2021 1:24:36PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
250614 12/22/2021 078790 078790 WILLARD, AMY
250615 12/22/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
103 Vouchers for bank code
103 Vouchers in this report
usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
425-712-0417
425-712-8251
425-775-1344
PO #
Description/Account
Total
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
Total
Bank total :
Total vouchers :
8.6.b
Page: 34
Amoun
10,000.0(
r-
m
E
�a
35.9,
35.9,
c
�a
16.91
a�
t
84.8E
E
71.2E
0
71.2E
0
95.0l' a
a
Q
111.4E
522.7, N
N
524,951.7;
N
524,951.7;
al
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 214
8.6.c
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun . .
ui
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK 1522
1522 SHANNON BURLEY CREDIT C
c
DOODLE: ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
E
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
83.4(
PEACHJAR: ADMIN: SUBSCRIPTIOI
a
001.000.64.571.21.49.00
325.0( .�
ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE
3
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
39.0< c
1522
CREDIT FOR CANCELLED ORDER:
ca
CREDIT FOR CANCELLED ORDER:
Y
U
001.000.63.557.20.35.00
-3,354.3� t
1522
1522 SHANNON BURLEY CREDIT C
U
AMAZON: ADMIN: OFFICE CHAIRS
E
001.000.64.571.21.35.00
483.3( u
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: WALL
c
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
11.6£ -@
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES: WALI
o
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
5.4£ a
ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE
Q-
Q
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES: PEN(
N
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
11.0< ti
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES: STAF
N
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
42.9£
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES: OFFI
L
3
001.000.63.557.20.35.00
976.8E
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: DESK
c
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
m
13.3', E
1522
1522 SHANNON BURLEY CREDIT C
U
ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
39.01' Q
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
310.1(
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
139.8E
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 215
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
y
BARTELL DRUGS: HUMAN SERVICI
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
250.0( E
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
441.5( a
SAFEWAY: HUMAN SERVICES SUP
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
_(D
650.0( 3
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
�
c
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
716.7( N
KROGER: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
1,000.0( t
QFC KROGER: HUMAN SERVICES ;
U
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
1,175.0( .
1814 -1814 BENNETT CREDIT CARD 12/E
FUEL FOR CHIEF'S VEHICLE - TRAI
o
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
45.0, '@
LODGING FOR WASPC CONFEREN
o
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
303.9E a
1880 parks 1880 PARKS CREDIT CARD
Q-
Q
OFFICE DEPOT: ADMIN SUPPLIES:
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
81.6f N
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COPY PE
ti
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
24.2E N
COSTCO: ADMIN SUPPLIES: SNACI
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
m
54.3, .L
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: WALL C)
3
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
69.2- c
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: CAKE
m
E
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
19.9�
STARBUCKS: REC SUPPLIES: COFI
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
39.6< Q
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: DESK OI
001.000.64.571.22.31.00 19.1 f
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: WALL C)
001.000.64.571.22.31.00 31.9-
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 216
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
y
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
193.1- E
AMAZON: HUMAN SERVICES SUPF
001.000.63.557.20.31.00
316.4E
1937 FLEET CC - 12/06/2021
%v
CARGO GLIDE - E193PO - PARTS
3
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
1,976.0< c
CARGO GLIDE - E191 PO - PARTS
`6
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
2,076.0'
CARGO GLIDE - E192PO - PARTS
t
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
1,976.0' U
WA DOL - 435-POL - REPORT OF S/
E
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
13.6E u
WA DOL - UNIT 131 - REPORT OF S
o
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
13.6E '@
AMAZON - E191 PO - PARTS/ JUMP
o
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
220.7z a
EMERALD CITY HARLEY - UNIT 928
Q-
Q
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
860.6,
UPS STORE - FLEET SHIPPING
N
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
18.8- ti
AMAZON - UNIT 628 - PARTS/ BRAC
N
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
30.8E
AMAZON - FLEET - SUPPLIES
L
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
20.9E 3
CAR TOYS - UNIT 66 - PARTS
c
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
88.9, E
WA DOL - E191 PO - REGISTRATION
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
U
63.5( +°
GOOD TO GO - UNIT 438 - TOLL BIL
Q
511.000.77.548.68.49.00 5.5(
AMAZON - UNIT 628 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.4,
PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR - 2022
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 217
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 4
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
ui
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
140.0(
BUD CLARY - E191 PO - PARTS/ BR)
E
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
151.4E
AMAZON - UNIT 628 - PARTS
a
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
40.7,
2519
-2519 PD 1 CREDIT CARD - 12/6/21
3
SHIP PROPERTY TO OWNER
�
c
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
19.2�
SHIP TO WSP LATENT PRINT LAB
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
U
21.0� t
SHIP TO SORENSON FORENSICS
U
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
105.41 ,E
SHIP TO WSP TOX LAB - MULT. CA;
�a
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
11.1-
FUEL SURCHARGE FOR #4
o
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
M
3.3, o
2660
ASUS VS228H MONITORS
a
CDW-G - ASUS VS228H 21.5" Moniti
Q-
Q
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
848.0(
2985
WWTP: C-FOLD TWLS&PPR TWL R
N
Amazon: PO 699 Blue & Blk Pens, C-
ti
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
110.9, N
Green River College: Jim Nordquist -
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 220.0( .L
PSI: Lucas Johnson Operator 2 Exarr 3
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 102.0( c
USBI: Biochar Symposium
E
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 45.0( c=
PSA: Jim Nordquist - Intro to +g
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 100.0( Q
PSA: Jim Nordquist: Lessons Learne(
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 100.0(
3048 -3048 THOMPSON CC 12/06/21
5 SOG MACHETES
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 218
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 5
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
ui
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
119.1E
5 CAR UNLOCK KITS
E
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
427.3,
REDUCING CIRCLE TARGETS
a
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
51.6(
6 TWO GALLON KEROSENE CANS
3
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
85.5-
HEADSHOT TRAINING TARGETS
`6
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
82.0(
5 DOZEN PAPERMATE PENS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
84.9E u
COMPUTER SPEAKERS - DESKTOI
E
001.000.41.521.30.31.00
33.1' u
2 DOZEN STENO NOTEBOOKS
o
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
19.7E 'R
2 BOXES NAVY 2 POCKET FOLDER
o
001.000.41.521.30.31.00
58.8( a
2022 CALENDARS
0-
Q
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
59.5�
FIREMARK SENSOR GLOVES
N
001.000.41.521.23.24.00
55.2( ti
FRANKLIN COVEY PLANNER
N
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
20.9,
9V ALKALINE & 3V LITHIUM BATTEF
L
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
181.5E
LUNCH - 4 ASSESSORS, 2 PST STP
c
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
133.5E E
DAUBER TOP STAMP
U
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
4.9E +°
ANNUAL DATA PLAN - 2 TRAIL CAM
Q
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
291.1E
2022 CALENDARS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 22.3E
4171 -4171 MCCLURE CREDIT CARD 12/1
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 219
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 6
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-71
ui
APPLE iCLOUD DATA STORAGE
001.000.41.521.40.41.40
0.9�
4697
BOARD & COMMISSION RETIREME
Canva subscription
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
12.9E
B&C retirements shipping postage
3
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
35.2(
4929
DEV SVCS US BANK
`6
International Code Council-
Y
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
U
121.0( t
Amazon-
U
001.000.62.524.10.35.00
949.3E .E
Seattle Times - monthly subscription-
�a
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
U
58.5( o
Click 2 Mail-
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
�a
64.6� o
Adobe Creative Cloud-
a
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
117.0( Q
Amazon-
�-
001.000.62.524.10.35.00
55.0� N
WABO-
ti
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
66.9� N
International Code Council-
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
m
219.0( .L
MailChimp-
3
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
23.1, c
5245
-5245 MACHADO CREDIT CARD 12/
m
E
FUEL FOR RENTAL CAR
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
24.2E
AIRPORT PARKING 11/29-12/3/21
Q
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 149.0(
BAGGAGE FEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 30.0(
5401 -5401 SAUNDERS CREDIT CARD 1',
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 220
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 7
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
-71
ui
LE DRONE ASSOC. MEMBERSHIP
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
400.0(
HIRING BEST APPLICANT COURSE
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
198.0(
EFFECTIVE WRITING FOR LE - XIN
%v
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
375.0( 3
5593
CITY CLERK'S CC PAYMENT
c
amazon office supplies
`6
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
89.3f
wapro membership quan
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
25.0( U
snohomish county recording for finani
E
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
20.0E u
snohomish county recording for finani
c
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
20.0( '@
snohomish county recording eng and
c
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
412.0( a
5639
PAYFLOW PAYMENT PROCESSOR
Q-
Q
Payflow payment processor
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
14.31 N
Payflow payment processor
ti
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
14.3 1 N
Payflow payment processor
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
m
14.3E .L
5919
5919 FRANCES CHAPIN CREDIT Ci
3
AMAZON: EAC SUPPLIES: SCREW[
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
63.81 E
AMAZON: EAC SUPPLIES: PLANNE
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
20.3(°
5923
CS/ECON DEV CREDIT CARD NOV[
Q
Holiday Market Advertising - Faceboo
001.000.61.558.70.41.40
50.0(
Diversity Film Series - Screening
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
145.0E
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 221
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 8
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-71
ui
Diversity Film Series - Facebook
001.000.61.557.20.41.40
25.0(
E
Holiday Trolley Signage - ARPA Fund
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
692.3,
a
Holiday Market & Downtown Survey
001.000.61.558.70.41.40
24.9,
3
OfficeSpace website listing for Octobf
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
100.0(
N
6459
6459 ANGIE FESER CREDIT CARD
Parcel 00373600500901 2021 Real E
t
126.000.64.594.76.61.00
2,796.4(
u
6654
SULLIVAN CC - 12/06/2021
E
SUPPLY HOUSE - PUBLIC SAFETY
2
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
313.5"
U
SUPPLY HOUSE - F.A.C. - PARTS/ A
o
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
184.5,
M
o
ZOOM - PRO ANNUAL T. SULLIVAN
a
001.000.66.518.30.49.00
165.4�
Q
6818
GFOA WEBINAR FOR M CAIN
�-
GFOA - 2021 GAAP Update webinar
N
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
180.0(
1-
7081
MRSC WEBINAR FOR M MENKVELI
N
MRSC - Annual Financial Reporting
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
120.0(
.L
7573
-7573 SMITH CREDIT CARD 12/6/21
3
MODULAR PHONE PLUGS FOR FA)
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
8.9-
JUMBO CROWFOOT WRENCH
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
13.7E
+g
COMPRESSED AIR - ARMORY
Q
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 20.9E
BOX W/DIVIDERS - PEPPERBALL
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 9.6E
EPDXY AND TACKLE BOX
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 222
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 9
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
ui
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
56.1'
GUN CLEANING SWABS
E
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
11.01
EPDXY SYRINGES
a
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
19.4,
8017 ENG CREDIT CARD NOVEMBER 20
3
ITE Trip Gen 11 - 5 Licenses
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
11675.0( N
Disposable Face Masks
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
44.9
E21 DA.Postcard Mailing
U
126.000.68.595.61.41.00
48.9 1 E
E21 DA.Postcard Mailing
M
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
U
28.7E o
8111 8111 MICHELE PARKER CREDIT CA
DOLLAR TREE: PRESCHOOL SUPP
>
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
7.7z a
DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: PRE!
0-
Q
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
120.7E
HOBBY LOBBBY: PRESCHOOL SUF
N
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
6.6E
ti
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
N
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
35.4z
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
L
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
40.8z
3
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
c
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
105.9E
E
FRED MEYER: PRESCHOOL SUPPI.
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
43.0-°
WAYFAIR: PRESCHOOL: DESK
Q
001.000.64.571.29.35.00
452.6E
WISHES: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: 1
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
36.4.E
HOBBY LOBBY: PRESCHOOL SUPF
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 223
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 10
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
^
N
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
84.7- c
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
d
E
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
10.8,
FRED MEYER: PRESCHOOL SUPPL
a
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
40.2, %v
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
3
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
49.6E c
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
`6
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
15.4,
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
18.1 £ U
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
E
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
168.3E u
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES:
o
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
36.3E -@
8474 8474 JESSE CURRAN CREDIT CAR
AMAZON: CEMETERY SUPPLIES: P
o
a
130.000.64.536.50.31.00
27.5� Q
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: OFFICE P
�-
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
41.4, N
HARRIS SEEDS: FLOWER PROGR/
ti
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
106.7- N
WSU PESTICIDE: CLASS REGISTR,
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
m
15.0( .L
WSU PESTICIDE: CLASS REGISTR,
3
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
60.0( c
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SOLAR P/
E
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
137.9� u
9821 -9821 GREENMUN CC 12/06/21
ZOOM STANDARD PRO MONTHLY I
Q
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
16.5z
8 PAIRS TACTICAL WORK GLOVES
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
190.0E
SNAGIT GVT UPGRADE & ASSETS
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 224
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 11
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
ui
55.1
SNAGIT GOVT MAINTENANCE
E
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
11.8E
BUNN AIRPOT FOR TRAINING ROO
a
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
52.9<
FAA PART 107 FULL COURSE
3
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
79.0(
14 DAY DRONE PILOT PRO
`6
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
48.0(
COMPRESSED GAS DUSTER 4 PAC
t
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
22.9E u
APPLE MONTHLY CLOUD STORAGI
E
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
0.9� u
2 8-PACKS OF 9V BATTERIES
o
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
30.8E -@
TLO SEARCHES FOR NOV 2021
0
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
82.8" a
MACHADO HOTEL - UOF SUMMIT
Q-
Q
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
573.8z
BID-9798 BID/ED! CREDIT CARD NOVEMBER
N
BID/Ed! My Edmonds News Sponsor
ti
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
110.0( N
BID/Ed! Branding Iron Posters/Table
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
m
79.0E .L
BID/Ed! Branding Iron Ornament Stro
3
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
59.6, c
BID/Ed! Sticker Mule Cheers Club
E
E
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
144.6,
BID/Ed! FB Ads
140.000.61.558.70.41.40
832.0, Q
BID/Ed! Michaels - Buddies Supplies
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
36.2'
BID/Ed! Edmonds Cash: Scavenger
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
40.0(
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 225
vchlist
12/20/2021 9:41:25AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12172021 12/17/2021 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.c
Page: 12
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
BID/Ed! Amazon Trolley Candy Cane:
y
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
61.9E E
BID/Ed! Lowe's Trolley Lights
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
49.6E
BID/Ed! Branding Iron Bingo Cards
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
481.3, 3
BID/Ed! Zoom Meeting Charges NovE
_
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
16.5, N
BID/Ed! Paddle.net QR Code Genera
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
66.2z
BID/Ed! Home Depot Trolley Supplies
U
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
25.3- .
BID/Ed! Branding Iron Scavenger Hui
U
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
192.3E o
Total:
31,101.11
Bank total :
31,101.11 a
Q.
Total vouchers :
31,101.11 Q
N
ti
N
L
3
r
c
m
E
U
�a
a
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 226
8.6.d
vchlist
12/22/2021 2:29:55PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun . .
ui
12222021 12/22/2021 062693 US BANK 0747
PW CC - 12/06/2021
c
AMAZON - DESK CALENDARS FOR
E
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
114.0E
TIDELINES 2022 CALENDARS
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
59.8E .�
ITUNES MONTHLY CHARGE FOR P
3
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
0.9� c
0881
UTM CC NOV 21
POSTAGE/PASSPORT
Y
U
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
1.8E
CONFERENCE UM
U
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
475.0( .
MEMBERSHIP UM
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
135.0( c
CONFERENCEJE
'@
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
475.0( c
MEMBERSHIP JE
a
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
135.0( Q
POSTAGE/PASSPORTS
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
17.4(
STAPLES
N
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
1,798.1- N
JURY SUPPLIES
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
761.8E 3
AMAZON
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
r
48.6E
AMAZON
E
001.000.23.512.50.35.00
402.9E U
TUITION
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
495.0( Q
AMAZON
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
194.3(
1558
ZOOM, DUO ,REV, DOMAIN NAME F
ENOM Domain Name Registration -
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 227
vchlist
12/22/2021 2:29:55PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12222021 12/22/2021 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.d
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-71
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
ui
31.4.E c
Zoom - Standard Biz Annual Oty 36
d
E
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
73.1(
Zoom - Audio License - Oty 36 11/17/
a
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
21.9(
Duo.com - MFA monthly qty 90
3
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
270.0(
Rev.com - Zoom Live Captions add o
`6
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
40.0(
2686
PW DRONE, WEBCAM LIGHTING
t
Amazon - Ring light w/stand-
U
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
34.6( ,E
Amazon - Ring light w/stand
�a
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
U
36.4, o
B&H Photo - Drone replacement for
512.100.31.518.88.35.00
�a
2,402.1 £ o
Best Buy
a
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
51.9" Q
2686
AMAZON CREDIT FOR NON DELIVE
--
Amazon - Ring light w/stand-
N
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
-34.6( 04
4474
COUNICL VISA CARD EXPENSES F
N
Award Services - two plaques for
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
176.6� .L
The People's Institute - Undoing Raci
3
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
700.0( c
Bartell Drug - batteries for CM Chen's
E
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
12.5E
Assoc. of WA cities - Elected Officials
+g
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
40.0( Q
9573
ZOOM, DOMAIN NAME REGISTRAT
Zoom - Cloud recording monthly (IT),
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
44.1 E
Zoom - Cloud recording monthly (IT),
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 228
vchlist
12/22/2021 2:29:55PM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
12222021 12/22/2021 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.6.d
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
ui
001.000.61.557.20.42.00
44.1 E
Zoom - Cloud recording monthly (IT),
m
E
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
54.1(
Zoom - Cloud recording monthly (IT),
a
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
44.1 E L_
Zoom - Cloud recording monthly (IT),
3
001.000.62.558.60.42.00
88.3,
ENOM Domain Name Registration -
`6
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
16.1 E
9644 OXG CC NOV 21
t
CORRECTIONAL COUNSELING-
U
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
1,056.1- ,E
PROBATION TRAVEL
�a
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
U
3.3, o
REGISTRATION APPA conference 1/,
001.000.23.523.30.49.00
M
345.0(
ALASKAAIR for conference
o
a
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
417.6( Q
Total:
111084.4< .,
Bank total :
11,084.45 N
N
Total vouchers :
11,084.45
m
L
3
r
c
m
E
M
U
�a
a
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 229
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
im
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study qMi
s018
E8FA
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
E8GA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
E8FC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
E8JA
STIR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STIR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s02O
E8JB
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
STIR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
20 Overlay Progranla
i042
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
02
STIR
2020 Traffic Calming _
i048
EOAC
STIR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STIR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STIR
2021 Guardrail Installations
iO57
E21AB
STIR
2021 Overlay Program
051
E21 CA
STIR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i062
E21DB
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i06O
E21CC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STIR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21 AA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059
E21CB
STIR
2022 Guardrail Program
i073
E22AC
STIR
2022 Overlay Program
i063
E22CA
STIR
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
i072
E22DA
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC _
STIR
2022 Signal Upgrades
i07O
E22AA
STIR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
i066
E22CD
STIR
2022 Traffic Calming Program
071
E22AB
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
s03O
E22NB
STIR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
i064
E22CB
220th Adapti
i028
E8AB
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
11111110&
2j/3th St,ysland & Mj�c. Ramna
i037
E8DC
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
STIR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
i052
E20CB
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
E8CA
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
ElCA
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
E8CC
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
urb Ram
i033
E8DB
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
iO4O
E91DA
STD
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
STIR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i05O
EODC
SWR Citvwide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c488
E6GB
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
Revised 12129/2021 Packet Pg. 230
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
8.6.e
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
MENfilfiiii
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
Jim
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
c564
E21 FE
STR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement 6
c561
E21JB
STR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coati
c473
ESKA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
STR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STR
Minor Sidewalk Program
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
GF
Official Street Map & SidewalkIan Update
STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c282
s014
i067
i068
c436
s011
c461
017
m013
s025
m105
c552
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
SWR
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
c566
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
WTR
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
c565
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
STM
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
L STM
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c567'
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
STR
SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_
9
STR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
i055
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
UTILITIES
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
s029
STR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
m160
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facili
c556
EBMA
E6AA
E22CE
E22CF
E4FD
ESGB
E4GC
E6DD
E7FG
EONA
E7FA
E20FC
E21FC
E22GA
EOJA
E21JA
E22JA
EOFB
E21FD
E22FA
EOGA
E21 GA
E9MA
E21 GB
ESFD
EOFA
E4HA
E22CG
E20CE
ESNA
E7FB
E6FD
E1 DA
ESAA
E22NA
E9DC
E7MA
E7MA
E7MA
E4FC
ESHA
EOJB
E22JB
E21 FA
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 231
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering Project
Project Accounting
Funding Number Number
i046
STR EOAB i047
o STR EOAC i048
STR EOCA i042
STR EOCC i053
STR EODA s024
STR i049
STR EODC i050
STM EO
STM EOFB c547
SWR EOGA JL48
WTR EOJA c549
Project Title
2020 Guardrail Installations
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
2020 Traffic Calming
2020 Overlay Program
2020 Waterline Overlay
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
2020 Pedestrian Safety Prog
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Projec
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
EOJB
26
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design) MEOPME" -
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
STR
E1CA
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR
E20CB
M
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD1
STR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvem
STR
E21AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STR
E21AB
i057
2021 Guardrail Installations
STR
E21 CA
051
2021 Overlay Program
WTR
E21 CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
STM
E21
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
STR r
E21 DB
M
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
E21 FB
�
AMSW Slope Stabilization r
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
STM
E21 FD
e 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21 FE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
MLSWR
E21 GA
JL59
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Proje
SWR
E21GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
WTR
E21JA
8
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
STR
F99AA
i070
2022 Signal Upgrades
STR
E22AB
i071
2022 Traffic Calming Program
STR
i073
2022 Guardrail Program
STR
E22CA
i063
2022 Overlay Program
STR
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STR
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Progra
STIR
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
STR
E2
i068
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
STR
E22CG
i069
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
STR
E22DA
i072
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
STM
E22FA
c567
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
SW
c566
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E22JA
c565
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
WTR
m160
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
UTILITIES
E22NA
s029
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 232
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Project Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
UTILITIES
E22NB
s030
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA JS
c446
J�tfall Groundwater Monitoring
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR E57
c470
cside Warning System
STR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
STR
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
SWR
E5GB
11
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
ST
Minor Sidewalk Program
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
SWR
E6GB
88
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
IV
STM
E7FB
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
WT
c498
2019 Waterline Replacert,
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
PRK E7Mq2WW
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
STR
E8CA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 21
STR
E8DB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STR
E8DIff
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STM
E8FA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
STM
E8FB
St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
SWJ&
E8GJW
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Proj4h
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES
s020 Zulu utlilre & GFC Update
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
IV
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overla
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 233
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
PM
EBMA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STIR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
ESKA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
ESDA
c474
Bikelink Project
STIR
ESDB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
ESFD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
WWTP
ESHA
c481
WWTP Ouffall Pipe Modifications
WTR
ESJB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
SWR
EBGA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
EBFB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
WTR
EBJA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
EBFC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
WTR
E21JA
c558
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
STM
E21 FB
c560
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
SWR
E21 GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
STM
E21 FD
c563
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21 FE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
WTR
E22JA
c565
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
SWR
E22GA
c566
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
E22FA
c567
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STIR
EBAB
i028
220th Adaptive
STIR
EBCA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 234
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
STIR
EBCC
031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STIR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STIR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STIR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STIR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STIR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STIR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
STIR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STIR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STIR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STIR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STIR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STIR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STIR
E21 CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
STIR
E20CB
i052
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STIR
EOCC
i053
2020 Waterline Overlay
STIR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STIR
E21 AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STIR
E21AB
i057
2021 Guardrail Installations
STIR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
WTR
E21 CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
STM
E21CD
i061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STIR
E21DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
STIR
E22CA
i063
2022 Overlay Program
STIR
E22CB
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STIR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STIR
E22CD
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
STIR
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
STIR
E22CF
i068
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
STIR
E22CG
i069
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
STIR
E22AA
i07O
2022 Signal Upgrades
STIR
E22AB
i071
2022 Traffic Calming Program
STIR
E22DA
i072
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
STIR
E22AC
i073
2022 Guardrail Program
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
WTR
E22JB
m160
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
ESGB
s0l l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
STIR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
WTR
EOJB
s026
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
UTILITIES
E22NA
s029
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
UTILITIES
E22NB
s03O
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
Revised 12129/2021 Packet Pg. 235
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
ProiectTitle
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
STM
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c567
E22FA
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STM
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
E21 FD
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STM
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
c564
E21 FE
STR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
E0D13
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STR
2021 Guardrail Installations
i057
E21 AB
STR
2021 Overlay Program
i051
E21 CA
STR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
i052
E20CB
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
ElCA
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
i067
E22CE
STR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
i068
E22CF
STR
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
i069
E22CG
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 236
8.6.e
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
ProiectTitle
Number
Number
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
040
E9DA
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STIR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
EODC
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
STIR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STIR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
055
E20CE
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STIR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
STIR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
061
E21 DB
STIR
2022 Overlay Program
i063
E22CA
STIR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
064
E22CB
STIR
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC
STIR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
066
E22CD
STIR
2022 Signal Upgrades
i07O
E22AA
STIR
2022 Traffic Calming Program
071
E22AB
STIR
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
i072
E22DA
STIR
2022 Guardrail Program
073
E22AC
STIR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STIR
220th Adaptive
028
EBAB
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
060
E21 CC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0l l
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21 GB
SWR
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
c566
E22GA
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
EBJB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
UTILITIES
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
s029
E22NA
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
s030
E22NB
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
059
E21 CB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
WTR
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
c565
E22JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
m160
E22JB
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
Revised 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 237
8.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Snohomish County Lease Renewal - Ballot Drop Box
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Prepared By: Angie Feser
Background/History
Snohomish County leases a location from the City of Edmonds near the Sno-Isle Library to provide a
ballot drop box. This lease is on an annual basis renewal and requires City Council approval to do so.
The lease agreement has been reviewed by City Attorney.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the lease renewal between City of Edmonds and Snohomish County for the location provision
of a ballot drop box.
Attachments:
CoE - SnoCo Licensing Agreement Renewal Ballot Drop Box 2021-12-22
Packet Pg. 238
8.7.a
LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR BALLOT DROP BOX LOCATIONS
This Licensing Agreement (the "Licensing Agreement") is entered into this day of _ , 2021
(the "Effective Date"), by and between City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington (the "City"), and Snohomish County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (the
"County") (the City and the County collectively, the "Parties").
WHEREAS, the City is the owner of certain real property and improvements (each a "Property"
and collectively, the "Properties");
WHEREAS, the County desires to utilize portions of the Properties for placement of mail ballot
drop boxes where Snohomish County voters will be able to deposit their mail -in election ballots; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to permit the County to place mail ballot drop boxes at one or more
of the Properties under terms and conditions set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the conditions and obligations set forth below, the
Parties agree as follows:
1. List of Properties. The Properties that may be used for the placement of mail ballot drop boxes
are listed in Exhibit 1 to this Licensing Agreement. The Parties, acting through their respective Project
Managers, may make additions and deletions to the list of Properties as mutually agreed in writing.
2. Grant of License. The City hereby grants to the County a license to access, enter, occupy and
use an area on each of the Properties listed in Exhibit 1 for the placement of mail ballot drop boxes
(each a "Drop Box" and collectively, the "Drop Boxes"). The Drop Box location on each Property shall be
mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties' respective Project Managers; subject to reasonable
relocations from time to time in the reasonable discretion of the City.
3. Term. This Licensing Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date and shall remain in
effect until December 31, 2022, with an option for four (4) additional 12 month renewals. Each twelve
(12) month renewal option shall automatically be exercised and become effective for that period of time
unless either the County or the City gives written notice to the other party by no later than October 1 of
the preceding calendar year that it has determined that the Licensing Agreement shall not be renewed
for the next option period. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the County's obligations after December 31,
2022, are contingent upon local legislative appropriation of necessary funds for this specific purpose in
accordance with the Charter and applicable law.
4. Termination of Licensing Agreement. The County or the City may terminate this Licensing
Agreement at any time upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other Party.
S. Compliance with Laws. In using Drop Boxes at the Drop Box Locations, the County shall at all
times comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances.
Packet Pg. 239
8.7.a
6. Amendments. No changes or additions shall be made to this Licensing Agreement except as
agreed to by both Parties and reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as are required
for the execution of this Licensing Agreement.
7. Obligations of the County.
7.1 The County shall securely affix each Drop Box only at the Drop Box Locations agreed to
in writing by the Parties prior to any affixation or preparatory work by the County, its
contractors or agents.
7.2 The County shall be responsible for all maintenance, repairs and upkeep to the Drop
Boxes and shall keep the Drop Boxes in a clean and safe functioning condition for the duration
of the Initial Term and any Renewal Terms.
7.3 The County shall be responsible for timely collection of ballots dropped off in the Drop
Boxes and for opening and closing the Drop Boxes at the County's desired times.
7.4 The County shall keep the Properties free of all liens for work performed in installing
and maintaining the Drop Boxes and will promptly pay amounts owed to any contractors for
such installation work and indemnify the City for any liability relating to such work.
7.5 Upon expiration or termination of this Licensing Agreement and within 90 days of such
notification, the County shall remove the Drop Boxes and restore all Drop Box Locations to the
same condition as existed before placement of the Drop Boxes.
8. Actions/Activities of the City.
8.1 The City shall not unreasonably obstruct or block access to the Drop Boxes during
periods when such boxes are open without written permission from the County.
8.2 The City shall have no duty or obligation to monitor the Drop Boxes but may inform the
County regarding any Drop Box requiring repair, upkeep or other maintenance.
9. Indemnification.
9.1 The County shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, injuries, liabilities, actions,
fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney fees) that arise out of or are
related to the negligent act or omissions of the County(and its officials, officers, employees and
agents acting within the scope of their employment) in the performance of the County's
obligations under this Licensing Agreement or the exercise of the County's rights and privileges
under this Licensing Agreement.
Packet Pg. 240
8.7.a
9.2 The foregoing provisions specifically and expressly intend to constitute a waiver of the
County's immunity under industrial insurance, Title 51 RCW, as respects the City only, and only
to the extent necessary to provide the City with a full and complete indemnity of claims made to
the City's employees. This waiver has been mutually negotiated.
10. Insurance. The City acknowledges, agrees and understands that the County is self -insured for all
of its liability exposures. The County agrees, at its own expense, to maintain through its self-insurance
program coverage for its liability exposures for the duration of this Licensing Agreement. The County
agrees to provide the City with at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of any change in the County's
self -insured status and upon request will provide the City with a letter of self-insurance as adequate
proof of insurance.
11. Project Managers. The Project Managers for each of the Parties are:
For the County: For the City:
Garth Fell Angie Feser
County Auditor Parks and Recreation Director
12. Notices. Notices required by this Licensing Agreement shall be personally served, sent by
certified mail or confirmed facsimile as follows:
If to the City:
City of Edmonds,
Public Works Department
2110 101h St. SW,
Edmonds, WA 98026
Attn: Facilities Manager, Jim Stevens
and
City of Edmonds
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
700 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Attn: Parks and Recreation Director
Phone: 425-771-0230
If to the County:
Snohomish County Elections
3000 Rockefeller Ave, M/S 505
Everett, WA 98201
Attn: Elections Manager
Phone: 425-388-3625
Packet Pg. 241
8.7.a
13. Permissive Use. The County acknowledges that all of the County's access to and use of the Drop
Box Locations before, during and after issuance of this Licensing Agreement is permissive on the part of
the City and the County makes no claim to title to the Drop Box Locations and is not acquiring any
such title via this Licensing Agreement. Title to the Drop Box Locations shall at all times remain with the
City.
City of Edmonds
Snohomish County
Mayor Date Garth Fell Date
County Auditor
Attest/Authenticated:
By:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 242
8.7.a
Licensing Agreement for Ballot Drop Box Locations
Between the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County
Exhibit 1
Drop Box Locations
Property
Address
Edmonds Library
650 Main Street
Edmonds 98020
Packet Pg. 243
8.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Executive Assistant Job Description Revision
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Background/History
All job descriptions are required to be reviewed and approved by City Council. The Parks, Recreation,
Cultural Arts and Human Services Department is updating the Executive Assistant position job
description which was last done seven years ago in May 2014 to more accurately reflect current job
performance requirements and expectations.
There are two attachments to illustrate the revisions; the first is the red and blue lined previous
description showing the suggested revisions and the second is a clean copy of the proposed job
description.
Staff Recommendation
City Council approve the proposed revised Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services
Department Executive Assistant Job Description as attached.
Attachments:
Executive Assistant PRCS Revisions - Redline Copy
Executive Assistant PRCS Revisions CLEAN COPY
Packet Pg. 244
8.8.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
Department: Parks, Recreation-&: Cultural Arts &
Human Services
Bargaining Unit: SEIU
Revised Date: May 2014
Pay Grade: NE-10
FLSA Status: Non Exempt
Reports To: Parks, Recreation & Cultural
Arts & Human Services
Director
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, plans and performs technical administrative office
coordination to assure smooth, timely and efficient office operations for the department; relieves department
Director and department Managers of technical clerical and administrative duties having department and City-
wide impact; researches, collects, analyzes and compiles data and information for inclusion in reports; maintains
complex financial records, files and budgets related to departmental operations, programs and expenditures.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -
specific duties.
• Provides administrative support to department Director, Deputy Director, Supervisors, department Managers,
and staff members.
• Plans and performs technical administrative office coordination; processes departmental accounts
payables and accounts receivables; processes departmental payroll and relieves the supervises Director
of technical clerical and administrative duties having City-wide impact.
• Performs, tracks, submits and maintains all department personnel changes and set-up including initial
processing of hiring, termination, promotion and paid leave new hire paperwork. Assists with candidate
interview scheduling, reference checks, and updating City employment database. Monitors and tracks
seasonal employee hours for Bargaining Agreement compliance. Tracks and monitors employee annual
performance reviews for completion and submission.
• Provides administrative support to Edmonds Memorial Cemetery and Columbarium; maintains cemetery
files and records; creates and notarizes cemetery deeds.
• Receives and processes awarded grants from federal, state and local agencies; tracks all related
invoices and submits for grant reimbursement.
• Compiles and tracks all department contracts including those for capital projects, professional services,
special events and tenant leases; ensures proper routing and signatures obtained.
• Conducts a variety of studies involving programs, systems, operations, special needs, issues or
activities of an assigned department.
• Researches, analyzes and prepares recommendations or conclusions on assigned projects such as
budget development and assists with collection of data at the request of the_ Supervise Director._
Participates on budget development team; collects and analyzes budget and financial information for
budget process and system entry; prepares and tracks department budget reports.
• Coordinates and manages various City donation and adoption programs including Edmonds Flower
Basket and Corner Park adoptions, Edmonds Giving Tree, and Edmonds Memorial Tree program.
• Prepares daily deposits and reports; reconciles all cashier transactions and prepares deposit for bank;
receipts. I Packet Pg. 245
8.8.a
• Monitors and registers department staff for conferences and trainings; prepares and routes appropriate
attendance authorization paperwork.
• Composes, prepares and types a variety of correspondence, memos, reports and other materials and
proofreads materials to assure accuracy and completeness.
• Organizes and coordinates office functions, activities and communications; assures efficient workflow
and office operations; assists with updates to department website and department -related social media
as needed.
• Develops new and improved programs, systems and procedures as a result of new policies or directives
or routine research and analysis. Assists with implementation after securing approval.
• Prepares reports, minutes, agendas, correspondence and other materials as appropriate and according
to decisions and approved actions.
• Researches, analyzes and prepares information on a variety of topics; coordinates efforts with City
departments, government agencies and vendors.
• Provides information to the public and others as requested performs public disclosure requests
regarding confidential records -in compliance with Washington State laws.
Executive Assistant A4aY-
2014December 2021
Packet Pg. 246
8.8.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
• Attends a variety of meetings including staff and management meetings as assigned; participates on
a variety of Citycommittees as directed.
• Provides staff support and clerical and administrative assistance to boards and committees; creates
and updates board Agendas and Minutes; uploads documents to City database and website. Provides
assistance as needed to the department Senior Office Specialist, and trains front office and receptionist
staff as neededs.
• Assists with collection of data, preparation of documents, taking of minutes and maintenance of records.
• Maintains confidentiality of sensitive departmental and other information; provides information and
assistance to City staff as needed.
• Prepares and maintains various records and files; archives files and records as needed in compliance
with the Washington State records retention schedule.
• Performs complex and varied clerical support to relieve the department of administrative detail including
answering telephones and greeting visitors; provides information in person or on the telephone or refers
to appropriate personnel; opens, screens and routes mail.
• Operates office machines including: computers, copiers, calculators, typewriters and other equipment as
assigned.
Required Knowledge of:
• City organization, procedures, federal and state laws.
• Administrative functions and operations of a City government.
• Research methods, data collection and statistical analysis.
• Accurate, lawful, and efficient record -keeping techniques.
• Budget monitoring and control including proficient skills in mathematics.
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy.
• Principles of customer service and public relations.
• Proper telephone etiquette.
• Effective oral and written communication principles and practices.
• Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications;
website and social media programs as needed in order to sufficiently perform assigned work.
• English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
• Principles of business letter writing.
Required Skill in:
• Performing technical clerical and administrative duties having department and City-wide impact.
• Planning and performing technical administrative office coordination duties.
• Maintaining records, files, and information in compliance with laws, policies and procedures.
• Interpreting, applying and explaining rules, regulations, policies, procedures and laws.
• Successfully meeting schedules and time lines.
• Preparing a variety of reports, logs, records and files related to assigned activities.
• Maintaining confidentiality of sensitive information; working confidentially with discretion.
• Being flexible and able to work with diverse personalities
• Researching a variety of subjects and presenting information in an efficient, accurate manner.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside
agencies, community groups and the general public.
• Meet schedules and time lines and ability to work independently.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations and customer service.
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services May 2014
Packet Pg. 247
8.8.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Two years of college -level training in business, office management, or related field and four years of increasingly
responsible executive assistant or administrative office support experience or any combination of education,
training and experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Valid State of Washington Driver's License.
Must be able to complete and pass a background check.
Mandatory drug test subject to conditional job offer.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment.
• Constant interruptions.
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Operating/using a computer keyboard and other office equipment.
• Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling or crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 20 lbs.
Hazards:
• Contact with angry or potentially dissatisfied customers.
Incumbent Signature:
Date:
Department Head: Date:
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services May 2014
Packet Pg. 248
8.8.b
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
Department: Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Pay Grade: NE-10
Human Services
Bargaining Unit: SEIU FLSA Status: Non Exempt
Revised Date: May 2014 Reports To: Parks, Recreation, Cultural
Arts & Human Services
Director
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, plans and performs technical administrative office
coordination to assure smooth, timely and efficient office operations for the department; relieves department
Director and department Managers of technical clerical and administrative duties having department and City-
wide impact; researches, collects, analyzes and compiles data and information for inclusion in reports; maintains
complex financial records, files and budgets related to departmental operations, programs and expenditures.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -
specific duties.
• Provides administrative support to department Director, Deputy Director, Supervisors, Managers, and staff
members.
• Plans and performs technical administrative office coordination; processes departmental accounts
payables and accounts receivables; processes departmental payroll and relieves the Director of technical
clerical and administrative duties having City-wide impact.
• Performs, tracks, submits and maintains all department personnel changes and set-up including initial
processing of hiring, termination, promotion and paid leave paperwork. Assists with candidate interview
scheduling, reference checks, and updating City employment database. Monitors and tracks seasonal
employee hours for Bargaining Agreement compliance. Tracks and monitors employee annual
performance reviews for completion and submission.
• Provides administrative support to Edmonds Memorial Cemetery and Columbarium; maintains cemetery
files and records; creates and notarizes cemetery deeds.
• Receives and processes awarded grants from federal, state and local agencies; tracks all related
invoices and submits for grant reimbursement.
• Compiles and tracks all department contracts including those for capital projects, professional services,
special events and tenant leases; ensures proper routing and signatures obtained.
• Conducts a variety of studies involving programs, systems, operations, special needs, issues or
activities of an assigned department.
• Researches, analyzes and prepares recommendations or conclusions on assigned projects such as
budget development and assists with collection of data at the request of the Director. Participates on
budget development team; collects and analyzes budget and financial information for budget process
and system entry; prepares and tracks department budget reports.
• Coordinates and manages various City donation and adoption programs including Edmonds Flower
Basket and Corner Park adoptions, Edmonds Giving Tree, and Edmonds Memorial Tree program.
• Prepares daily deposits and reports; reconciles all cashier transactions and prepares deposit for bank;
processes customer refunds as needed; maintains and distributes petty cash account, tracks all related
receipts. Packet Pg. 249
8.8.b
• Monitors and registers department staff for conferences and trainings; prepares and routes appropriate
attendance authorization paperwork.
• Composes, prepares and types a variety of correspondence, memos, reports and other materials and
proofreads materials to assure accuracy and completeness.
• Organizes and coordinates office functions, activities and communications; assures efficient workflow
and office operations; assists with updates to department website and department -related social media
as needed.
• Develops new and improved programs, systems and procedures as a result of new policies or directives
or routine research and analysis. Assists with implementation after securing approval.
• Prepares reports, minutes, agendas, correspondence and other materials as appropriate and according
to decisions and approved actions.
• Researches, analyzes and prepares information on a variety of topics; coordinates efforts with City
departments, government agencies and vendors.
• Provides information to the public and others as requested performs public disclosure requests
regarding confidential records in compliance with Washington State laws.
Executive Assistant December 2021
Packet Pg. 250
8.8.b
JOB DESCRIPTION
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
• Attends a variety of meetings including staff and management meetings as assigned; participates on
a variety of Citycommittees as directed.
• Provides staff support and clerical and administrative assistance to boards and committees; creates
and updates board Agendas and Minutes; uploads documents to City database and website. Provides
assistance as needed to the department Senior Office Specialist, and trains front office and receptionist
staff as needed.
• Assists with collection of data, preparation of documents, taking of minutes and maintenance of records.
• Maintains confidentiality of sensitive departmental and other information; provides information and
assistance to City staff as needed.
• Prepares and maintains various records and files; archives files and records as needed in compliance
with the Washington State records retention schedule.
• Performs complex and varied clerical support to relieve the department of administrative detail including
answering telephones and greeting visitors; provides information in person or on the telephone or refers
to appropriate personnel; opens, screens and routes mail.
• Operates office machines including: computers, copiers, calculators, typewriters and other equipment as
assigned.
Required Knowledge of:
• City organization, procedures, federal and state laws.
• Administrative functions and operations of a City government.
• Research methods, data collection and statistical analysis.
• Accurate, lawful, and efficient record -keeping techniques.
• Budget monitoring and control including proficient skills in mathematics.
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy.
• Principles of customer service and public relations.
• Proper telephone etiquette.
• Effective oral and written communication principles and practices.
• Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications;
website and social media programs as needed in order to sufficiently perform assigned work.
• English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
• Principles of business letter writing.
Required Skill in:
• Performing technical clerical and administrative duties having department and City-wide impact.
• Planning and performing technical administrative office coordination duties.
• Maintaining records, files, and information in compliance with laws, policies and procedures.
• Interpreting, applying and explaining rules, regulations, policies, procedures and laws.
• Successfully meeting schedules and time lines.
• Preparing a variety of reports, logs, records and files related to assigned activities.
• Maintaining confidentiality of sensitive information; working confidentially with discretion.
• Being flexible and able to work with diverse personalities
• Researching a variety of subjects and presenting information in an efficient, accurate manner.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside
agencies, community groups and the general public.
• Meet schedules and time lines and ability to work independently.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations and customer service.
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services December 2021
Packet Pg. 251
8.8.b
JOB DESCRIPTION
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Two years of college -level training in business, office management, or related field and four years of increasingly
responsible executive assistant or administrative office support experience or any combination of education,
training and experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Valid State of Washington Driver's License.
Must be able to complete and pass a background check.
Mandatory drug test subject to conditional job offer.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment.
• Constant interruptions.
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Operating/using a computer keyboard and other office equipment.
• Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling or crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 20 lbs.
Hazards:
• Contact with angry or potentially dissatisfied customers.
Incumbent Signature:
Date:
Department Head: Date:
Executive Assistant- Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services December 2021
Packet Pg. 252
8.9
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
September 2021 Quarterly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
September 2021 Quarterly Financial Report
Attachments:
Complete September 2021 Quarterly Report
Jan -Sept 2021 P&L
Packet Pg. 253
8.9.a
INSIDE THIS
ISSUE:
Revenues By Fund
Summary
Expenditures By
Fund Summary
General Fund
Revenues
Expenditures By
Fund Detail
Gen. Fund Depart-
ment Expenditures
Summary of Operating Funds: Revenues
1 This report is a summary of the City's preliminary
operating results for the three quarters ended September 30,2021.
Revenue Update:
2 As the coronavirus pandemic contin-
ues, more people have been vaccinat-
ed against COVID-19, and govern-
3 ment-provided stimulus plans have
contributed to a significant economic
recovery nationwide. Our regional
6 economy, including our City, contin-
ues to exceed expectations. Howev-
er, not enough people have been vac-
cinated to suc-
12 cessfully Slow CASE COUNT HEAT MAP (SEPTEMBER 19, 2021 - OC70SER 2, 2021)
the pandemic,
and as a result a
Investment Portfolio 32 new "Delta vari-
ant" is becoming
Fund Balance prevalent.
Overview 34
Right. Cases and
hospitalizations
are once again
increasing, and
authorities now
fear that COVID
will have lasting
impacts to our
lives far beyond
the current year.
Nine month Gen-
eral Fund reve-
nues of $30.3
million are 9%
ahead of budg-
et. The largest
contributor to
this is from sales
tax collections
that are $1.6 mil-
lion ahead of this
time last year,
and $1.2 million
ahead of budget.
Due to a current-
ly strong local
and regional
economy, virtu-
ally all tax col-
lections are ahead of last year's pace, as
well as ahead of budget. (page 21.)
Revenues by Category:
General Fund revenues for the nine
months ended September 30, 2021 are
higher than 2020 in all categories. Gen-
eral Fund revenues to date exceed reve-
nues for the same period last year by $3.3
million, or 12%.
�R , DM6RD1GT0�+
FAUS
E
MAILTEO 9i0FbMI5HY`�
CRECK
EOMON
LL
WOOOWAY
HONWX S kTAN �.
Case Distribution
September 19 - October 2, 2021
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of September
Packet Pg. 254
Summary of Operating Funds: Expenditures
General Fund ex-
penditures for nine
stol
months are $232,506
Top:
greater than this timesport
Construction of Civ-
last year, which is 7%
I
is Field continues,
under the bud eted
g
with completion
anticipated for late
amount.
2022 or early 202
" R
footprint
0
General Fund expens-
es by sub -fund and
line item categories
are on page 24 and
expenses by depart-
ment are on pages 31-
32. Every department
in the General Fund
i
is reasonably where
expected after nine
months, and the Gen-
i*
Ieral Fund as a whole
z
has spent 68% of its
1
annual budget. This
same information can
be found
graphical form on pages
8-16.
Elections were held
on August 3,with
three City Council
seats up for grabs.
The November elec-
tion brought a
change in two
Council seats, with
Will Chen displac-
ing Luke Distelhorst
in Position 2, and
Neil Tibbott displac-
ing Adrienne Fraley
-Monillas in Posi-
tion 3.
in 34% of the annual expenditure budget for
those funds.
Special Revenue Funds during the Other City Highlights
year have spent only 30% of their an- The Washington State Auditor's Office
nual expense budget. This is ex- recently concluded the annual financial
pected, as much of the underspending audit of the City. We intend to submit the
comes from REET funds, which at City's audited annual report to the Gov-
75% of the way through the year have ernment Finance Officers Association for
Ispent only 33% of their annual allot- consideration for the Certificate of
ment. In addition, the City received Achievement for Excellence in Finan-
$5,946,550 in American Rescue Plan cial Reporting. If successful, this would
Act (ARPA) funds this summer, of be the eighth consecutive year we have
which only $92K have been spent so earned this prestigious award.
far. Additional Special
IRevenue Fund ex-
penditure information
can be found on pages
125-26. ELECTION
The total fund balance -
for the General Fund
I and Sub -funds at Sep20
-
tember 30 is $16.0 mil-
lion, or approximately
is k
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of September
Packet Pg. 255
I 8.9.a I
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months)
Series5 Seriesl
10,000, 000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000 ' ; • ; •
6,000,000 •
5,000,000 •
4,000,000
3,000,000 _
2,000, 00U t .0 ,
1,000, 000
October January April July October January April July
General Fund Tax Revenue (2015 through 2020)
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
12,000, 000
10,000, 000
8,000,000 _ _
6,000,000
4,000, 000
2,000,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
General Fund Tax Revenue (2021 YTD)
9,000,000
$7,479,695
8,000,000
7,000,000
$5,917,666 $5,935,118
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000 2 333 433
2,000,000
1,000,000
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
O
CL
am
w
v
c
c
ii
L
yd+
L
fC
7
CI
N
O
N
L
a
U)
1
I Packet Pg. 256
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 2,287,290
$ 2,287,290
$ 2,740,276
19.80%
February
4,613,781
2,326,491
5,089,278
10.31%
March
7,107,230
2,493,449
7,050,949
-0.79%
April
10,175,039
3,067,809
11,029,475
8.40%
May
18,374,709
8,199,670
20,122,774
9.51%
June
20,786,286
2,411,577
22,872,014
10.03%
July
23,079,988
2,293,702
25,583,320
10.85%
August
25,616,155
2,536,167
28,113,466
9.75%
September
27,881,561
2,265,406
30,286,676
8.63%
October
31,748,856
3,867,296
November
40,108,232
8,359,375
December
42,450,777
2,342,545
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2021
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 195,748
$ 195,748
$ 625,840
219.72%
February
341,557
145,810
922,678
170.14%
March
525,343
183,786
1,222,093
132.63%
April
697,989
172,646
1,478,072
111.76
May
895,413
197,424
1,949,651
117.74%
June
1,120,061
224,648
2,330,065
108.03%
July
1,335,075
215,015
2,879,064
115.65%
August
1,581,214
246,138
3,453,870
118.43%
September
1,849,736
268,522
3,818,929
106.46%
October
2,083,774
234,038
November
2,308,787
225,013
December
2,500,000
191,213
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2
Packet Pg. 257 1
I 8.9.a I
SALES TAX SUMMARY
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: September 2021
Year -to -Date
Total $7,479,695
Health & Personal
Care, $195,380
Construction Trade,
$1,117,165
Accodation,
$24,105
Clothing and
Accessories, $244,580
Communications,
$182,1/
Wholesale Trade,,
$277,885
Amusement
es,
ie, $30,603
Food Stores,
$255,661
ing, $94,167
Others, $180,843 Eating & Drinking,
$740,906
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
10,000,000
8,000,000
$8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046
7 395 114 $7,479,695
$6,741,838 $6,905,122
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000, 000
0
201 2017 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
wr
kim
3
Packet Pg. 258
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2021
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 661,963
$ 661,963
$ 774,198
16.95%
February
1,491,081
829,118
1,647,058
10.46%
March
2,110,825
619,744
2,350,659
11.36%
April
2,677,870
567,045
3,041,781
13.59%
May
3,379,279
701,409
3,922,140
16.06%
June
4,038,220
658,941
4,797,214
18.80%
July
4,756,025
717,805
5,699,002
19.83%
August
5,547,915
791,890
6,634,250
19.58%
September
6,288,480
740,565
7,479,695
18.94%
October
7,063,515
775,035
November
7,866,501
802,986
December
8,600,000
733,499
Gas Utility Tax
Sales and Use Tax
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-"- Current Year Budget - Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 82,557
$ 82,557
$ 84,132
1.91%
February
170,654
88,097
172,999
1.37%
March
250,947
80,292
269,171
7.26%
April
317,447
66,501
350,366
10.37%
May
368,586
51,139
413,190
12.10%
June
403,108
34,522
453,419
12.48%
July
430,884
27,777
489,128
13.52%
August
454,299
23,415
512,233
12.75%
September
475,121
20,822
535,887
12.79%
October
498,594
23,472
November
537,295
38,702
December
595,000
57,705
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
w
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
4
Packet Pg. 259
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2021
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
69,351 $
69,351 $
56,592
-18.40%
February
138,426
69,074
85,370
-38.33%
March
199,085
60,660
140,907
-29.22%
April
265,909
66,823
190,824
-28.24%
May
325,636
59,728
218,932
-32.77%
June
385,177
59,540
274,873
-28.64%
July
443,946
58,770
322,813
-27.29%
August
501,501
57,554
365,431
-27.13%
September
557,882
56,382
391,086
-29.90%
October
615,320
57,437
November
665,999
50,679
December
723,000
57,001
Electric Utility Tax
800,000
Telephone Utility Tax
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
179,984 $
379,889
546,637
730,293
873,813
997,568
1,114,337
1,230,154
1,342,671
1,453,976
1,576,729
1,710,000
179,984 $ 192,356
199,905 367,328
166,748 537,433
183,656 721,208
143,520 872,875
123,755 987,183
116,769 1,105,355
115,816 1,217,532
112,517 1,330,863
111,305
122,753
133,271
6.87
-3.31
-1.68
-1.24
-0.11
-1.04
-0.81
-1.03
-0.88
Electric Utility Tax
1,zsuu,uuu
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C
d
w
O
C
C
M
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
la.
d
Cn
5
Packet Pg. 260
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2021
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 779,311
$ 779,311
$ 785,708
0.82%
February
1,323,513
544,201
1,376,327
3.99%
March
2,123,378
799,865
2,200,360
3.63%
April
2,634,733
511,355
2,730,111
3.62%
May
3,397,533
762,799
3,527,366
3.82%
June
3,993,888
596,356
4,181,353
4.69%
July
4,928,107
934,219
5,161,097
4.73%
August
5,728,520
800,414
6,057,803
5.75%
September
6,831,863
1,103,343
7,158,105
4.78%
October
7,628,547
796,684
November
8,538,589
910,042
December
9,090,825
552,236
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2021
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 384,276
$ 384,276
$ 377,845
6.87%
February
1,216,009
831,732
1,205,144
-3.31%
March
1,599,504
383,495
1,586,561
-1.68%
April
1,939,303
339,799
1,926,094
-1.24%
May
2,323,204
383,901
2,307,849
-0.11%
June
2,663,931
340,727
2,647,822
-1.04%
July
3,048,086
384,154
2,994,340
-1.76%
August
3,880,066
831,980
3,819,514
-1.56%
September
4,263,771
383,706
4,201,629
-1.46%
October
4,604,458
340,687
November
4,988,465
384,006
December
5,316,477
328,012
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
tV
L
CD
XI
G
d
Q.
d
Cn
0
Packet Pg. 261 1
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2021
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 846,742
$ 846,742
$ 806,699
-4.73%
February
1,539,036
692,295
1,482,613
-3.67%
March
2,387,119
848,083
2,293,552
-3.92%
April
3,078,705
691,586
2,976,527
-3.32%
May
3,923,269
844,563
3,802,264
-3.08%
June
4,616,005
692,736
4,493,851
-2.65%
July
5,485,907
869,902
5,279,791
-3.76%
August
6,180,993
695,086
5,974,891
-3.33%
September
7,065,967
884,974
6,845,543
-3.12%
October
7,769,759
703,792
November
8,630,384
860,626
December
9,319,928
689,544
Unmeter Sewer Sales
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
Q
d
U
C
M
C
LL
i
d
Ls
t4
7
N
O
N
L
a)
E
d
Q
U)
7
Packet Pg. 262
■ 8.9.a
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
4,845,167 $
4,845,167
$ 4,488,492
-7.36%
February
8,240,292
3,395,126
7,637,016
-7.32%
March
11,746,201
3,505,909
11,022,804
-6.16%
April
15,231,541
3,485,340
14,232,961
-6.56%
May
18,483,451
3,251,910
17,443,966
-5.62%
June
22,684,269
4,200,818
21,115,256
-6.92%
July
26,549,767
3,865,498
24,346,357
-8.30%
August
30,224,810
3,675,044
27,848,489
-7.86%
September
33,657,349
3,432,539
31,332,012
-6.91%
October
37,442,814
3,785,464
November
41,528,072
4,085,259
December
45,978,718
4,450,646
Non -Departmental
General Fund
,000,000
,000,000
16,000,000
12,000,000
8,000,000
4,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--P--Current Year Budget —Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 2,126,439
$ 2,126,439
$ 2,013,112
-5.33%
February
2,957,339
830,899
2,845,113
-3.79%
March
3,909,781
952,442
3,679,050
-5.90%
April
4,736,733
826,952
4,484,023
-5.34%
May
5,415,966
679,234
5,278,401
-2.54%
June
6,873,740
1,457,774
6,412,264
-6.71%
July
7,909,844
1,036,104
7,203,386
-8.93%
August
8,774,178
864,334
8,115,624
-7.51%
September
9,513,240
739,062
8,838,355
-7.09%
October
10,425,754
912,513
November
11,547,839
1,122,086
December
12,881,593
1,333,754
Non -Departmental
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--O— Current Year Budget — Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
w
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
Packet Pg. 263
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2021
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
27,295 $
27,295 $
26,808
-1.79%
February
57,824
30,529
53,681
-7.17%
March
91,440
33,616
83,267
-8.94%
April
122,323
30,882
110,738
-9.47%
May
163,149
40,826
137,169
-15.92%
June
212,026
48,877
164,613
-22.36%
July
246,267
34,241
192,621
-21.78%
August
293,761
47,494
219,652
-25.23%
September
333,076
39,315
247,315
-25.75%
October
357,472
24,396
November
393,733
36,262
December
432,478
38,745
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2021
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
28,543 $
28,543 $
27,531 -3.55%
February
58,378
29,835
55,740 -4.52%
March
86,855
28,477
83,532 -3.83%
April
115,847
28,992
111,352 -3.88%
May
144,377
28,530
138,910 -3.79%
June
172,357
27,980
166,677 -3.30%
July
200,988
28,631
194,309 -3.32%
August
230,481
29,494
221,858 -3.74%
September
259,088
28,607
249,093 -3.86%
October
287,175
28,087
November
315,280
28,104
December
345,501
30,221
Office of Mayor
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--0-CurrentYeaz Budget •PriorYeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
w
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
9
Packet Pg. 264
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2021
Human Resources
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 73,271
$ 73,271
$ 75,120
2.52%
February
138,790
65,519
132,066
-4.84%
March
202,112
63,322
187,141
-7.41%
April
262,791
60,679
252,612
-3.87%
May
326,332
63,541
319,298
-2.16%
June
403,462
77,130
368,323
-8.71%
July
464,647
61,185
419,004
-9.82%
August
528,490
63,843
462,324
-12.52%
September
598,547
70,057
506,717
-15.34%
October
664,032
65,485
November
731,681
67,649
December
837,176
105,495
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2021
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 88,422
$ 88,422
$ 93,953
6.26%
February
185,102
96,680
183,450
-0.89%
March
279,267
94,165
275,717
-1.27%
April
374,976
95,709
359,370
-4.16%
May
477,911
102,935
445,221
-6.84%
June
568,960
91,049
535,746
-5.84%
July
663,035
94,076
622,191
-6.16%
August
760,661
97,626
749,313
-1.49%
September
855,256
94,594
857,840
0.30%
October
954,530
99,275
November
1,047,855
93,324
December
1,166,183
118,328
Municipal Court
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
200,00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
w
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
10
Packet Pg. 265
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2021
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
41,233 $
41,233 $
43,221
4.82%
February
88,221
46,989
85,831
-2.71%
March
135,256
47,034
130,319
-3.65%
April
184,259
49,003
157,909
-14.30%
May
233,650
49,391
198,730
-14.95%
June
281,295
47,646
263,632
-6.28%
July
332,496
51,200
308,903
-7.10%
August
387,551
55,056
366,310
-5.48%
September
434,722
47,170
427,478
-1.67%
October
487,409
52,687
November
550,406
62,997
December
624,198
73,792
City Clerk
Community Services/Economic Development
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget -0-- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 73,276
$ 73,276
$ 78,859
7.62%
February
133,953
60,677
139,396
4.06%
March
196,194
62,241
209,183
6.62%
April
261,901
65,707
272,337
3.98%
May
322,071
60,170
328,247
1.92%
June
380,379
58,308
351,029
-7.72%
July
444,659
64,280
363,075
-18.35%
August
511,894
67,234
408,783
-20.14%
September
567,756
55,862
444,121
-21.78%
October
625,324
57,568
November
692,090
66,766
December
757,055
64,965
City Clerk
800,000
-.00001
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000 ,
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
tv
w
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
tv
Q.
d
11
Packet Pg. 266
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2021
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
136,722 $
136,722 $
117,002
-14.42%
February
290,515
153,792
168,294
-42.07%
March
386,224
95,709
350,229
-9.32%
April
453,827
67,604
404,389
-10.89%
May
542,997
89,170
460,963
-15.11%
June
634,330
91,333
519,736
-18.07%
July
713,918
79,588
572,585
-19.80%
August
806,613
92,695
642,362
-20.36%
September
902,103
95,490
711,971
-21.08%
October
985,360
83,257
November
1,067,005
81,645
December
1,257,909
190,904
Finance
Technology Rental Fund
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
116,793 $
116,793
$ 137,736
17.93%
February
202,688
85,896
226,074
11.54%
March
289,766
87,077
314,260
8.45%
April
377,999
88,233
402,835
6.57%
May
466,613
88,615
490,038
5.02%
June
576,420
109,807
625,371
8.49%
July
670,117
93,697
766,314
14.36%
August
756,308
86,191
875,083
15.70%
September
853,460
97,152
990,749
16.09%
October
943,512
90,052
November
1,030,441
86,929
December
1,118,378
87,937
Administrative Services
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 1
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
2
U
C
O
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
12
Packet Pg. 267
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2021
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
78,040 $
78,040 $
69,941
-10.38%
February
156,080
78,040
142,526
-8.68%
March
234,120
78,040
212,467
-9.25%
April
312,160
78,040
282,407
-9.53%
May
390,200
78,040
352,348
-9.70%
June
468,240
78,040
404,226
-13.67%
July
546,280
78,040
492,368
-9.87%
August
624,320
78,040
562,309
-9.93%
September
702,360
78,040
632,249
-9.98%
October
780,400
78,040
November
858,440
78,040
December
936,480
78,040
Police
City Attorney
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-- Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
948,663 $
948,663
$ 992,942
4.67%
February
1,933,831
985,168
1,856,572
-4.00%
March
2,901,114
967,283
2,871,535
-1.02%
April
3,878,067
976,953
3,802,023
-1.96%
May
4,844,411
966,345
4,751,092
-1.93%
June
5,873,421
1,029,009
5,731,600
-2.41%
July
6,905,785
1,032,364
6,626,850
-4.04%
August
7,852,686
946,901
7,550,794
-3.84%
September
8,847,063
994,377
8,445,438
-4.54%
October
9,934,749
1,087,687
November
11,184,244
1,249,495
December
12,217,071
1,032,827
Police
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"- Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
2
C
O
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
13
Packet Pg. 268
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2021
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
256,049 $
256,049
$ 219,157
-14.41%
February
537,665
281,616
448,394
-16.60%
March
818,171
280,505
690,769
-15.57%
April
1,116,880
298,709
934,573
-16.32%
May
1,419,687
302,807
1,185,423
-16.50%
June
1,698,802
279,115
1,471,283
-13.39%
July
2,000,438
301,636
1,730,845
-13.48%
August
2,308,559
308,121
1,960,572
-15.07%
September
2,606,786
298,227
2,183,294
-16.25%
October
2,898,446
291,660
November
3,237,188
338,742
December
3,585,738
348,550
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
3,600,000
3,200,000
2,800,000
2,400,000
2,000,000
1,600,000
1,200,000
800,000 ,.
400,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--o-Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
319,744 $
319,744
$ 308,283
-3.58%
February
651,727
331,983
655,977
0.65%
March
1,004,599
352,872
971,861
-3.26%
April
1,371,174
366,574
1,273,239
-7.14%
May
1,749,534
378,360
1,604,251
-8.30%
June
2,129,825
380,291
2,002,869
-5.96%
July
2,608,624
478,799
2,366,948
-9.26%
August
3,159,845
551,221
2,760,446
-12.64%
September
3,607,041
447,196
3,252,343
-9.83%
October
3,989,956
382,916
November
4,323,317
333,361
December
4,729,281
405,964
Parks & Recreation
4,000,000
3,500,000
11500,000
1,000,000
500,000
I row'-
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
14
Packet Pg. 269
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2021
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
42,089 $
42,089 $
40,605
-3.53%
February
84,997
42,908
81,720
-3.86%
March
127,527
42,530
123,465
-3.19%
April
170,261
42,734
170,658
0.23%
May
213,078
42,817
212,461
-0.29%
June
256,751
43,673
254,025
-1.06%
July
300,611
43,860
297,102
-1.17%
August
343,101
42,490
337,783
-1.55%
September
385,406
42,305
378,963
-1.67%
October
426,793
41,387
November
468,729
41,936
December
512,253
43,524
Facilities Maintenance
600,000
Public Works Administration
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
1 OQ,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
167,724 $
167,724
$ 142,909-14.80%
February
348,879
181,155
294,332-15.63%
March
533,264
184,385
528,741 -0.85%
April
706,629
173,365
711,450 0.68%
May
894,239
187,611
856,587 -4.21%
June
1,043,804
149,565
989,625 -5.19%
July
1,223,905
180,101
1,170,492 -4.36%
August
1,414,941
191,036
1,445,505 2.16%
September
1,622,246
207,305
1,840,452 13.45%
October
1,898,737
276,491
November
2,125,911
227,174
December
2,442,899
316,988
Facilities Maintenance
11,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
15
Packet Pg. 270
I 8.9.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2021
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 212,668 $
212,668
$ 218,316
2.66%
February
423,271
210,602
436,144
3.04%
March
652,974
229,703
661,498
1.31%
April
890,809
237,835
888,001
-0.32%
May
1,130,883
240,074
1,122,224
-0.77%
June
1,371,946
241,063
1,346,241
-1.87%
July
1,617,159
245,213
1,560,038
-3.53%
August
1,869,308
252,149
1,770,434
-5.29%
September
2,101,156
231,848
1,985,684
-5.50%
October
2,337,410
236,254
November
2,559,700
222,290
December
2,793,032
233,332
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
C.
d
w
O
C
<C
C
ll
L
d
R
7
CY
F
N
O
N
L
�C
G
d
Q.
d
v
16
Packet Pg. 271
I 8.9.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
As of September 30, 2021
Years
Agency/ Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon
Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate
Grant Cnty WA
FFCB
Energy Northw est
Energy Northw est
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Grant Cnty WA
Grant Cnty WA
Seattle WA Muni
FHLB
First Financial - ECA
Kent WA
Spokane County WA
First Financial - Waterfront Center
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
CD
Bonds
Bonds
CD
TOTAL SECURITIES
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool
Kent WA,
2%
Mason &
Kitsap Cnty
WA, 5%
Grant Cnty P
WA, 15%
FFCB, FHLB,
Energy 12% 12%
Northwest,
10%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
410,553
0.25
405,000
406,563
01/01/22
1.79%
1,998,548
0.70
2,000,000
2,025,818
06/14/22
1.88%
1,466,077
0.75
1,345,000
1,393,891
07/01/22
5.00%
260,748
0.75
250,000
255,145
07/01/22
2.95%
948,084
1.17
855,000
902,324
12/01/22
5.00%
1,517,955
1.25
1,500,000
1,522,080
01/01/23
1.54%
576,332
1.25
520,000
550,940
01/01/23
5.00%
2,224,500
1.34
2,000,000
2,127,940
02/01/23
5.00%
1,996,590
2.01
2,000,000
1,998,864
10/05/23
0.22%
2,803,516
2.13
2,803,516
2,803,516
11/15/23
2.08%
286,648
2.17
250,000
275,548
12/01/23
5.00%
259,075
3.17
250,000
261,300
12/01/24
2.10%
2,000,000
6.09
2,000,000
2,000,000
11/01/27
0.25%
16,748,624
1.77
16,178,516
16,523,929
23,629,895
23,629,895
Demand
0.09%
32,350,880
32,350,880
Demand
1.13%
Issuer Diversification Seattle WA
Muni, 12%
First
Financial -
CD, 30%
Spokane
County
WA, 2%
$ 72,159,291 $ 72,504,703
Cash and Investment Balances Checki ng,
(in $ Millions) $4.4 , 6%
Bonds,
$11.4, 15%
CD-s, $4.8,
6 � State LGI
$23.6, 31
County
LGIP,
$32.4, 42%
O
IZ
d
U
C
M
C
LL
L
d
tC
7
a
T-
N
O
N
N
E
d
sZ
N
fn
17
Packet Pg. 272
I 8.9.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,236,875
$1,200,000
$1,000, 000 $947,931
$800,000 $779,607
$635,781
$600,000 423,799
$400,000
$200,000
$-
2016 7 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
18
Packet Pg. 273
I 8.9.a I
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Receive
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 42,450,777
$26,979,585 $
30,286,676
$ 12,164,101
71
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
300,000
212,500
-
300,000
0
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
2,620
-
-
2,620
0
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,010
2,500
2,500
2,510
50
017
MARSH RESTORATION &PRESERVATION FUND
-
100
150
(150)
0 OQ.
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
165,370
64,352
1,869
163,501
d
1
111
STREET FUND
1,722,360
1,324,391
1,318,882
403,478
77
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
3,068,385
1,605,788
1,935,971
1,132,414
63
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
165,060
32,521
29,657
135,403
C
18
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
270
437
508
(238)
188
L
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
71,460
47,927
54,892
16,568
77
R
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
25,240
11,889
12,365
12,875
49
CY
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,390
292
537
853
39 v--
N
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
24,000
16,575
19,861
4,139
83 N
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1
1,282,050
1,112,754
1,986,272
(704,222)
155
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1
1,285,240
1,106,850
1,975,448
(690,208)
154 E
d
127
GIFT S CATALOG FUND
103,930
45,176
49,788
54,142
48 Q,
d
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
179,800
111,789
199,874
(20,074)
111 Co
136
PARKSTRUST FUND
2,200
3,599
4,188
(1,988)
190 t
O
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
29,220
32,929
46,606
(17,386)
160 =
d
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,120
2,750
2,776
7,344
27
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
79,239
63,142
65,585
13,654
83 L
d
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND
65,000
50,924
55,830
9,170
86 e0
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
5,946,550
-
5,952,359
(5,809)
100 Cl
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
759,710
47,291
40,853
718,857
5 G
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
1,392,520
1,399,359
438,755
953,765
32 L
d
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
31,765
5,880
(5,880)
0 M
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
10,299,357
7,479,807
8,118,880
2,180,477
79 d
422
STORM UTILITY FUND 2
6,265,225
4,582,015
5,283,056
982,169
84 d
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND s
31,130,450
13,927,175
18,832,083
12,298,367
N
60 r
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,551
600,425
1,385,445
30 d
0.
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,331,100
1,425,297
1,137,597
193,503
85 G
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,204,880
904,475
918,257
286,623
76 V
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
67,270
54,747
-
67,270
0 =
d
$ 111,421,673
$ 63,297,251 $
79,378,380
$ 32,043,293
71 s
1 2021 REET revenues are $1,742,116 higher than 2020 revenues.
2 Difference primarily due to a Grant reimbursement in January 2021, as well as 2021 storm rate increase of 5%
3 Differences primarily due to WWTP billings to their partners in January 2021.
19
Packet Pg. 274
8.9.a
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF FAMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
No. Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001 GENERAL FUND
$ 45,978,718
$ 31,099,506
$ 31,332,012
$ 14,646,706
689
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
467,140
188,748
205,570
261,570
449
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
-
-
5,900
09
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
210,222
-
210,222
09
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
20,000
16,149
3,851
819 C
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
123,581
123,581
-
1009
019
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
28,445
-
28,445
-
1009 <0
.5
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
30,332
-
45,800
09 a
111
STREET FUND
2,187,430
1,555,484
1,575,701
611,729
729 E
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
2,862,297
900,136
1,524,722
1,337,575
539 >%
L
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
236,880
20,200
32,215
204,665
149 �
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
87,150
39,007
40,520
46,630
469 7
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
632
1,266
25,614
59 T-
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
450
75
2,925
N
39 N
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
29,900
3,509
-
29,900
09
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
1,601,298
1,165,383
491,761
1,109,537
319 E
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
2,053,911
1,245,824
731,742
1,322,169
d
369 Q.
127
GIFTS CATALOG FUND
100,900
64,883
33,470
67,430
339 CO)
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
200,998
133,042
152,725
48,273
769 r
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
50,000
-
-
50,000
09 Q.
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND
25,000
19,211
5,789
N
779
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
11
-
11,900
09
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
76,340
46,035
41,446
34,894
549
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
5,946,550
816,165
91,666
5,854,884
7
29 (�J
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
759,700
47,291
40,853
718,847
59 N
0
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
5,552,490
963,763
301,059
5,251,431
59 M
421
WATER UTILITYFUND
10,760,050
8,102,729
6,552,692
4,207,358
619 4)
4)
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
7,293,890
6,252,778
3,265,985
4,027,905
459
w
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
40,492,284
14,546,529
18,442,716
22,049,568
469 y
N
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
309 4)
r
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,429,954
786,695
956,098
473,856
679
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,257,909
807,205
711,971
545,938
579 G
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
96,167
61,772
75,099
21,068
789 V
$ 132,008,554
$ 69,494,651
$ 67,389,167
$ 64,619,387
51°
20
Packet Pg. 275
8.9.a
Page 1 of 3
C TTY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 4
$ 10,936,400
$ 5,785,298
$ 5,917,666
$ 5,018,734
540i
2 EMSPROPERTYTAX4
4,137,031
2,258,817
2,333,433
1,803,598
560/
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
500
26
4
496
10/
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 5
8,600,000
5,920,380
7,479,695
1,120,305
870/
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
7,600
5,629
8,320
(720)
1090/
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
828,500
590,153
698,441
130,059
840r
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
1,710,000
1,316,801
1,330,863
379,137
780/
8 GASUTILITYTAX
595,000
510,729
535,887
59,113
900/
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
364,000
275,790
271,128
92,872
740/
10 WAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX
1,153,000
812,013
713,779
439,221
620/
11 SEWER UTILITYTAX
894,600
574,385
684,749
209,851
770/
12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX
471,900
386,876
420,688
51,212
890/
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
722,000
602,599
600,997
121,003
830r
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
723,000
528,163
391,086
331,914
540/
15 PULLTABSTAX
55,200
37,754
58,459
(3,259)
1060/
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
350
449
143
207
410/
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
295,900
226,105
220,575
75,325
750/
31,494,981
19,831,968
21,665,911
9,829,070
699
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER
24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
29 ANIMAL LICENSES
30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
31 OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
32 DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE
33 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
34 TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT
35 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
36 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2
37 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT
38 DOC FAC ROOFING
39 WA STATE ART COMMISSION 2021-003-CD
40 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
41 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX
42 2022-2023 BIENNIUM ONE-TIME ALLOCATION
43 ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT
44 STATE GRANT FROM OTHER JUDICIAL AGENCIES
45 SCHOOL ZONE
46 CJ - POPULATION
47 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
48 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
49 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
50 DUI - CITIES
51 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX
52 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
53 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
54 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
55 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
56 INTERLOCAL GRANTS
57 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS
250
315
500
(250)
2000/
700
80
-
700
00/
50,000
6,526
42,803
7,197
860/
702,700
511,351
500,753
201,947
710/
41,000
30,154
28,503
12,497
700/
100,600
56,323
47,179
53,421
470r
434,000
255,690
271,246
162,754
620/
201,000
170,045
175,248
25,752
870/
58,700
50,430
66,750
(8,050)
1140/
30,000
-
21,529
8,471
720/
650,600
528,805
564,750
85,850
870r
22,000
9,299
9,488
12,512
430/
50,000
77,312
41,921
8,079
840/
20,000
12,928
14,983
5,017
750i
2,3619550
197099258
197859653
575,897
760,
-
559
-
-
00/
6,000
2,052
6,464
(464)
1080/
4,000
-
-
4,000
00/
7,100
1,623
916
6,184
130/
-
-
3,947
(3,947)
00/
-
-
3,448
(3,448)
00/
-
-
379,270
(379,270)
00/
-
-
6,000
(6,000)
00/
198,000
-
-
198,000
00/
210,500
207,989
-
210,500
00/
-
-
168,950
(168,950)
00/
-
8,599
-
-
00/
140
-
-
00/
-
825
-
-
00/
13,070
9,803
10,362
2,708
790i
16,740
12,114
12,105
4,635
720/
45,600
35,117
36,923
8,677
810/
60,000
50,966
60,515
(515)
1010/
4,500
4,448
5,143
(643)
1140/
-
-
53,334
(53,334)
00/
261,500
191,593
216,694
44,806
830/
343,200
253,877
251,697
91,503
730/
2,000
4,001
335
1,665
170/
550
-
-
550
00/
-
-
27,216
(27,216)
00/
-
-
66,000
(66,000)
00/
1,172,760
783,705
1,309,318
(136,558)
1120,
4 2021 Real Personal/Property Taxis $132,367 higher than 2020, and EMS Property Taxis $74,616 higher for total of $206,983.
5 2021 Local Retail SaleslUse Tax revenues are $1,559,315 higher than 2020 revenues Please also see pagespages 3 & 4.
O
Q.
C
C
IL
A
d
R
Cl
T_
N
O
N
L
d
M
E
d
Q.
d
CO)
21
Packet Pg. 276
I 8.9.a I
Page 2 of 3
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 9/30/2020
Title Budget Revenues
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
13 PHOTOCOPIES
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES
17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE)
18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
24 LEGAL SERVICES
25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
26 BOOKING FEES
27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
33 PLAN CHECKING FEES
34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE
36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES
39 PROGRAM FEES 6
40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
41 WINTERMARKET REGISTRATION FEES
42 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES
43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
3,000
600
11,000
150
300
4,000
1,000
50
100
25,100
600
1,000
500
200,000
1,400
85,000
10,000
30,000
76,800
195,000
57,000
1,050
38,000
3,000
10,000
3,500
1,007,500
2,500
50
65,600
350,900
4,000
500
3,000
14,000
15,500
3,682
120
5,107
7
65
235
2,358
589
66
9
411
205,765
56,685
5,795
36,753
149,144
58
47,791
1,183
31,603
1,997
17,682
3,147
784,324
1,880
60,065
211,993
14,870
2,220
12,897
3,083
9/30/2021 Amount
Revenues Remaining %Received
4,418
142
3,924
2
168
98
423
144
165
184,125
51,102
18,118
2,505
204,825
42
45,982
326
22,283
657
23,963
1,823
662,287
2,496
80,618
365,725
12,439
158
3,700
13,475
91
(1,418)
458
7,076
148
300
(168)
3,902
577
(94)
100
25,100
600
835
500
15,875
1,400
33,898
10,000
11,882
74,295
(9,825)
(42)
11,018
724
15,717
2,343
(13,963)
1,677
345,213
4
50
(15,018)
(14,825)
(8,439)
342
(700)
525
15,409
147°/
24°/
36°/
1 °/
00/
00/
2 0/^,
42°/ 0
287°/ a)
0°/ w
00/
i0
00/ t�
16 °/ c�C
00/
920/ 9+
00/ i
60°/
0°/ ca
60°/
CY
3-/ ,
10501 C
0°/ cV
81 °/
31 °/
59°/ d
22° Q
240°/ m
52°/ N
66°/
100°/ O
00/ d
123°/
104°/ >+
311°/ d
32°/
123°/
96°/ Cy
1 °/ ti
900,662
88,869
404,890
495,772
450/
1,300
-
-
1,300
00/
5,000
4,510
7,605
(2,605)
1520/
-
-
2,660
(2,660)
00/
800
-
680
120
850/
2,892,106
2,216,105
2,491,460
400,646
860/
6,021,568
3,971,068
4,613,516
1,408,052
770/
6 2021 Parks & Recreation Program Revenues are $316,020 higher than 2020 revenues.
22
Packet Pg. 277 1
8.9.a
Page 3 of 3
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKING INFRACT ION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
15 CRIM CONV FEE CT
16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
20 CRIM CONV FEE CN
21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT
23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
MISCELLANEOUS :
26 INVESTMENT INTEREST
27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
29 SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS
30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
31 LEASES LONG TERM
32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
33 PARKSDONATIONS
34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
40 POLICE JUDGMENTS✓RESTITUTION
41 CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORTAGES
42 OTHER MISC REVENUES
43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
45 NSF FEES - POLICE
46 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
47 NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT
48 US BANK REBAT E
TRANSFERS -IN:
49 OPERATING TRANSFER -IN
50 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM FUND 018
51 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
TO TAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$ 2,000 $
1,002 $
2,139 $
(139)
1070/
230,000
89,134
135,851
94,149
590/
18,000
10,608
7,298
10,702
410/
10,000
7,948
9,939
61
990/
1,000
760
6,803
(5,803)
6800/
1,500
1,088
1,503
(3)
1000/
100,000
59,603
41,312
58,688
410/
2,000
794
419
1,581
210/
7,000
6,958
5,634
1,366
800/
300
190
73
227
240/
100
35
63
37
630/
1,500
1,901
1,247
253
830/
25,000
17,782
11,520
13,480
460/
2,000
1,849
1,454
546
730/
700
455
82
618
120/
100
37
12
88
120/
10,000
6,293
1,592
8,408
160/
800
955
330
470
410/
1,000
615
202
798
200/
200
82
70
130
350/
8,000
6,202
4,083
3,917
5101
14,000
6,946
5,989
8,011
430/
3,000
2,921
1,216
1,784
410/
10,100
-
-
10,100
00/
150
-
187
(37)
1250/
448,450
224,158
239,018
209,432
530,
155,090
252,060
240,140
(85,050)
15501
9,980
11,507
5,598
4,382
560/
3,400
5,746
6,275
(2,875)
1850/
153,000
20,404
81,395
71,605
530/
2,100
380
-
2,100
00/
205,000
122,746
143,012
61,988
700/
2,500
910
-
2,500
00/
3,500
920
750
2,750
210/
2,000
635
2,010
(10)
1010/
5,000
100
3,503
1,497
700/
300
-
118
182
390/
3,000
3,566
6,547
(3,547)
2180/
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/
2,000
1,344
3,444
(1,444)
1720/
200
238
743
(543)
3710/
-
16
24
(24)
00/
5,000
13,467
5,207
(207)
1040/
100
34
73
27
730/
100
30
60
40
600/
-
-
30
(30)
00/
150
142
-
150
00/
-
30
-
-
00/
8,500
7,251
9,153
(653)
1080/
562,920
441,527
508,083
54,837
900/
238,667
- 28,445
210,222
120/
123,581
- 123,581
-
1000/
26,300
17,900 13,150
13,150
500/
388,548
17,900 165,176
223,372
430/
$ 42,450,777
S 26,979,585 S 30,286,676
$ 12,164,101
710/
O
Q.
lY
<v
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
Cl
T_
N
O
N
4)
E
d
Q.
4)
23
Packet Pg. 278
I 8.9.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 17,545,152
$ 12,375,788
$ 12,591,739
$ 4,953,413
729
2 OVERTIME
491,580
441,861
494,159
(2,579)
10V
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
281,329
5,394
7,101
274,228
Y
4 BENEFITS
6,780,322
4,764,385
4,676,028
2,104,294
W
5 UNIFORMS
89,151
69,355
54,545
34,606
W
6 SUPPLIES
401,115
327,558
330,914
70,201
829
7 FUEL CONSUMED
-
-
215
(215)
W
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
108,603
128,614
178,145
(69,542)
164°
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,037,824
9,362,476
9,539,107
5,498,717
6Y
10 COMMUNICATIONS
160,995
105,525
151,313
9,682
949
11 TRAVEL
68,760
8,652
22,224
46,536
32°
12 EXCISE TAXES
6,500
11,549
18,950
(12,450)
292°
13 RENTAL/LEASE
1,574,465
1,356,050
1,139,145
435,320
729
14INSURANCE
403,973
393,746
405,121
(1,148)
1009
15 UTILITIES
536,762
370,411
419,336
117,426
7K
16 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
917,742
495,737
632,868
284,874
W
17 MISCELLANEOUS
507,715
280,034
326,069
181,646
64°
18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
50,000
75,000
50,000
-
100°
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
932,880
449,033
234,945
697,935
259
20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
9,053
-
23,120
W
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
54,530
-
54,530
W
22 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
-
-
500
W
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
5,700
69,285
60,087
(54,387)
1054°
45,978,718
31,099,506
31,332,012
14,646,706
6K
LEO FF-MEDIC AL INS. RESERVE(009)
24 BENEFITS
$ 206,650 $
108,192
$ 106,145
$ 100,505
5V
25 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
74,764
82,425
170,565
33°
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
5,793
17,000
(10,000)
243°
27 MISCELLANEOUS
500
-
-
500
W
467,140
188,748
205,570
261,570
44°
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFTFUND (014)
28 SUPPLIES
$ 100 $
-
$ -
$ 100
W
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
-
200
W
30 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
-
5,600
W
5,900
-
5,900
W
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016)
31 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
$ 210,222 $
-
$
$ 210.222
W
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND (017)
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
20,000
$
- $
16,149
$
3,851
W
20,000
-
16,149
3,851
81°
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
33 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $
123,581
$
- $
123,581
$
-
100°
123,581
-
123,581
100°
EDMONDS OPIOID, RESPONSEFUND (019)
34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $
28,445
$
- $
28,445
$
1009
28,445
28,445
-
100°
DRUG ENFORCENIEnTTFUND (104)
35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
45,000
$
$
-
$
45,000
W
36 REPAIR/MAINT
800
800
W
37 MISCELLANEOUS
-
30,332
-
W
45,800
30,332
45,800
W
O
IZ
d
Z
C
co
C
LL
i
d
O
O
Cl
T-
N
O
N
d
E
d
d
CO)
24
Packet Pg. 279
I 8.9.a I
Page 2 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DErAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
STREETFUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 728,690
$ 483,391
$ 547,550
$ 181,140
75`.
2 OVERTIME
18,400
32,748
33,348
(14,948)
18V
3 BENEFITS
381,336
238,670
267,305
114,031
70°
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,781
5,432
568
9V
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
135,304
125,705
137,295
4K
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
684
3,565
16,435
18°
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23,210
2,307
8,829
14,381
3K
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
5,570
5,162
(662)
115°
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0°
10 RENTAL/LEASE
247,270
173,799
186,447
60,823
759
11 INSURANCE
148,436
156,937
148,533
(97)
100°
12 UTILITIES
280,918
193,981
183,418
97,500
659
13 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
52,000
49,147
48,497
3,503
93°
14 MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
3,250
11,691
(3,691)
1469
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
75,658
-
-
0°
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,220
-
-
4,220
09
17INTEREST
450
255
220
230
49°
COMBINED STREErCONST/IMPROVE(112)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
19 BENEFIT S
20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
21 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
22 MISCELLANEOUS
23 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
24 LAND
25 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
26 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
27 INTEREST
MUNIC IPAL ARTS AC Q UIS. FUND (117)
28 SUPPLIES
29 SMALL EQUIPMENT
30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
31 TRAVEL
32 RENTAL/LEASE
33 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
34 MISCELLANEOUS
HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36 MISCELLANEOUS
37 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
EMPLOYEEPARIONG PERMIT FUND (121)
38 SUPPLIES
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
40 MISCELLANEOUS
TO URIS M PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123)
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 2,187,430 $ 1,555,484 $ 1,575,701 $ 611,729 72°
-
10,567
0
-
6,613
-
-
09
1,581,847
143,083
744,072
837,775
479
103,670
320,161
67,863
35,807
65°
-
8
0a
114,950
40,121
39,925
75,025
35°
33,000
-
(842)
33,842
-Y
955,000
305,428
599,912
355,088
639
72,220
72,201
72,201
19
100°
1,610
1,952
1,591
19
99°
$ 2,862,297 $
900,136 $
1,524,722 $
1,337,575
53°
$ 4,700 $
114 $
265 $
4,435
6°
1,700
116
-
1,700
0°
221,500
18,503
28,877
192,623
1Y
80
-
-
80
09
2,000
-
2,000
0°
300
-
-
300
0°
6,600
1,466
3,074
3,526
47°
$ 236,880 $
20,200 $
32,215 $
204,665
14°
$ 83,150 $ 36,415 $ 38,520 $ 44,630 469
- 592 - - 0°
4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 50°
$ 87,150 $ 39,007 $ 40,520 $ 46,630 46°
$ 1,790 $ 632 $ 1,266 $ 524 71°
25,090 - - 25,090 0�
$ 26,880 $ 632 $ 1,266 $ 25,614 5�
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ 75 $ 2,925 Y
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ 75 $ 2,925 Y
$ 29,900 $ 3,509 $ $ 29,900 0°
$ 29,900 $ 3,509 $ $ 29,900 0°
O
0.
d
c
O
C
IL
L
d
ev
C1
N
0
N
L
d
E
w
E3
d
CO)
25
Packet Pg. 280
I 8.9.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 121,000
$ 14,374
$ 55,954
$ 65,046
469
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
195,626
263,944
112,715
82,911
5K
3 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
105,000
350,618
263,865
(158,865)
25V
4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
190
-
-
190
0�
5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,179,482
536,447
59,227
1,120,255
5�
$ 1,601,298
$ 1,165,383
$ 491,761
$ 1,109,537
3V
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 (126)
6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
11 INTEREST
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
12 SUPPLIES
13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
15 MISCELLANEOUS
16 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
CEMETERY MAINTENANC UIMPRO VEMENT (13 0)
17 SALARIES AND WAGES
18 OVERTIME
19 BENEFIT S
20 UNIFORMS
21 SUPPLIES
22 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
23 SMALL EQUIPMENT
24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25 COMMUNICATIONS
26 TRAVEL
27 RENTAL/LEASE
28 UTILITIES
29 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
30 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUST FUND (136)
31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CEIVVIETTERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
32 SMALL EQUIPMENT
33 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
34 SUPPLIES
35 TRAVEL
36 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENTDISTRICT FUND (140)
37 SUPPLIES
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
39 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142)
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
41 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
42 INTEREST
$ 573,234 $
582,937 $
279,160 $
294,074
49°
97,050
257,722
194,829
(97,779)
20V
138,910
12,963
11,863
127,048
9°
983,137
390,719
244,609
738,528
25°
144,530
-
-
144,530
0°
117,050
1,484
1,282
115,768
1 ci
$ 2,053,911 $
1,245,824 $
731,742 $
1,322,169
36°
$ 67,500 $
39,033 $
20,320 $ 47,180
309
6,500
600
- 6,500
09
-
7,183
-
0°
600
168
- 600
0°
26,300
17,900
13,150 13,150
509
$ 100,900 $
64,883 $
33,470 $ 67,430
3Y
$ 95,824 $
68,905 $
76,479 $
19,345
809
3,500
558
302
3,198
9°
40,472
29,697
29,862
10,610
749
1,000
-
-
1,000
09
7,000
2,417
1,461
5,539
21°
20,000
14,279
23,609
(3,609)
11 K
-
1,184
-
-
01,
4,200
150
800
3,400
19°
1,700
1,261
1,262
438
74°
500
-
-
500
0°
16,650
6,172
12,488
4,163
75°
5,652
3,296
3,745
1,908
669
500
-
-
500
0°
4,000
5,124
2,717
1,283
6K
$ 200,998 $
133,042 $
152,725 $
48,273
769
$ 50,000 $ - $ $ 50,000 0�
$ 50,000 $ - $ $ 50,000 0�
$ 25,000 $ - $ $ 25,000 0�
- - 19,211 (19,211) 0�
$ 25,000 $ - $ 19,211 $ 5,789 779
$ 1,500 $ 11 $ $ 1,500 0�
4,500 - 4,500 09
5,900 - 5,900 0°
$ 11,900 $ 11 $ $ 11,900 09
$ 2,050 $
9,476 $
397 $
1,653 19°
70,035
34,286
39,795
30,240 579
4,255
2,273
1,254
3,001 29°
76,340
46,035 S
41,446
34,894 54°
$ 5,946,550 $ 816,165 $ 91,666 $ 5,854,884 2�
5,946,550 816,165 91,666 5,854,884 2�
$ 677,990 $ - $ - $ 677,990 0°
81,710 47,291 40,853 40,857 50°
$ 759,700 $ 47,291 $ 40,853 $ 718,847 5°
O
Q
d
<3
Z
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
Cl
T-
N
O
N
sZ
E
d
.r
Q.
N
co
26
Packet Pg. 281
I 8.9.a I
Page 4 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 113,453
$ 339,616
$ 189,094
$ (75,641)
1679
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
44,000
-
-
44,000
0°
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,395,037
624,147
111,965
5,283,072
2°
$ 5,552,490
$ 963,763
$ 301,059
$ 5,251,431
5°
WATER FUND (421)
4 SALARIES AND WAGES
5 OVERTIME
6 BENEFIT S
7 UNIFORMS
8 SUPPLIES
9 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
10 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
11 SMALL EQUIPMENT
12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13 COMMUNICATIONS
14 TRAVEL
15 EXCISE TAXES
16 RENTAL/LEASE
17 INSURANCE
18 UTILITIES
19 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
20 MISCELLANEOUS
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
24 REVENUE BONDS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
$ 793,475 $
635,088 $
493,045 $
300,430
629
24,000
14,042
15,727
8,273
66°
328,865
240,113
210,218
118,647
649
4,000
3,374
3,437
563
86°
150,000
82,698
82,297
67,703
55°
2,170,000
1,457,879
1,358,748
811,252
6Y
170,000
131,727
151,788
18,212
89°
11,000
5,197
3,917
7,083
36°
1,558,701
977,347
1,470,514
88,187
94°
30,000
21,460
22,409
7,591
75°
200
-
-
200
0�
1,649,700
1,141,355
1,075,936
573,764
65°
124,630
97,622
94,615
30,015
76°
97,844
52,541
98,196
(352)
100°
35,775
20,283
20,961
14,814
599
258,130
19,881
158,267
99,863
619
123,600
99,971
130,502
(6,902)
106°
644,130
204,067
198,136
445,994
3V
1,976,050
2,766,338
839,806
1,136,244
42°
2,840
-
-
2,840
0°
385,100
-
-
385,100
0°
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
1009
196,170
105,907
98,336
97,834
50°
$ 10,760,050 $
8,102,729 $
6,552,692 $
4,207,358
6V
STORM FUND (422)
27 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 723,700 $
465,837 $
507,777 $
215,923
70°
28 OVERTIME
6,000
10,247
19,075
(13,075)
31K
29 BENEFITS
318,735
214,855
218,121
100,614
6K
30 UNIFORMS
6,500
6,437
5,049
1,451
7K
31 SUPPLIES
46,000
18,401
27,347
18,653
599
32 SMALL EQUIPMENT
4,000
1,629
304
3,696
K
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,728,016
1,392,995
1,160,429
1,567,587
4Y
34 COMMUNICATIONS
3,200
4,241
4,656
(1,456)
145°
35 TRAVEL
4,300
-
510
3,790
12°
36 EXCISE TAXES
470,100
448,637
488,846
(18,746)
1049
37 RENTAL/LEASE
267,778
203,197
197,788
69,990
74°
38INSURANCE
66,216
116,576
66,228
(12)
100°
39 UTILITES
11,025
8,975
10,083
942
91°
40 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
64,130
15,103
80,978
(16,848)
1269
41 MISCELLANEOUS
255,300
117,342
189,602
65,698
74°
42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
281,810
78,897
76,327
205,483
279
43 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,581,000
3,035,064
100,618
1,480,382
6°
44 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
103,340
-
-
103,340
0°
45 REVENUE BONDS
188,240
-
-
188,240
09
46 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
53,590
53,576
53,576
14
100°
47 INTEREST
110,910
60,769
58,672
52,238
5Y
$ 7,293,890 $
6,252,778 $
3,265,985 $
4,027,905
459
O
Q
d
Z
C
C
IL
L
d
ev
O
C1
N
O
N
L
d
E
w
Q.
d
6n
27
Packet Pg. 282
I 8.9.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 2,027,508
$ 1,416,668
$ 1,304,468
$ 723,040
64°
2 OVERTIME
95,000
75,731
99,735
(4,735)
105°
3 BENEFITS
871,564
610,307
569,281
302,283
65°
4 UNIFORMS
8,500
7,474
8,514
(14)
10W
5 SUPPLIES
404,000
276,687
284,325
119,675
7W
6 FUEL CONSUMED
30,000
14,928
55,215
(25,215)
1849
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
0°
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
36,680
162,103
(127,103)
46Y
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,141,848
2,759,995
3,085,205
(943,357)
144°
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
30,290
33,315
9,685
77
11 TRAVEL
5,000
-
2,330
2,670
47°
12 EXCISE TAXES
968,000
716,462
834,493
133,507
86°
13 RENTAL/LEASE
329,898
243,714
328,443
1,455
100°
14 INSURANCE
160,967
174,140
162,851
(1,884)
10V
15 UTILITIES
1,979,985
697,646
1,043,229
936,756
5Y
16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
520,630
150,052
393,702
126,928
769
17 MISCELLANEOUS
129,350
61,964
92,781
36,569
72°
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10,180,936
83,575
3,804,155
6,376,781
379
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
2,584,681
-
-
W
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
19,756,808
4,411,390
5,796,581
13,960,227
299
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
157,060
-
-
157,060
W
22 REVENUE BONDS
86,670
-
-
86,670
W
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
173,900
158,325
173,888
12
1009
24 INTEREST
382,660
33,421
202,153
180,507
5Y
25 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
-
-
1,518
(1,518)
W
26 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
2 399
4 430
(4 430)
W
$ 40,492,284 $ 14,546,529 $ 18,442,716 $ 22,049,568 469
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
27 REVENUE BONDS $ 785,020 $ - $ - $ 785,020 W
28 INTEREST 1,200,850 616,542 600,417 600,433 5W
$ 1,985,870 $ 616,542 $ 600,417 $ 1,385,453 3W
O
Q
d
<3
Z
C
C
IL
L
d
R
7
CY
N
0
N
L
O
M
E
d
d
CO)
28
Packet Pg. 283
I 8.9.a I
Page 6 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 272,384
$ 201,881
$ 205,110
$ 67,274
75°
2 OVERTIME
2,000
824
2,267
(267)
113°
3 BENEFITS
116,481
83,912
84,503
31,978
7Y
4 UNIFORMS
1,000
1,050
1,129
(129)
11Y
5 SUPPLIES
120,000
54,905
50,483
69,517
429
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
0�
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
258,000
89,058
123,721
134,279
48°
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
1,140
5,979
52,021
10°
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
3,974
985
45,765
2°
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
1,672
1,713
1,287
579
11 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0°
12 RENTAL/LEASE
12,790
9,240
9,215
3,575
72°
13 INSURANCE
40,910
40,270
39,334
1,576
96°
14 UTILITIES
14,500
11,359
12,076
2,424
83°
15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
60,000
34,756
31,962
28,038
53°
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
8,359
10,303
1,697
869
17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
410,139
244,293
377,315
32,824
92°
$ 1,429,954
$ 786,695
$ 956,098
$ 473,856
67°
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
379,162
$
215,189
$
227,065
$
152,097
609
19 OVERTIME
2,000
-
2,257
(257)
11Y
20 BENEFITS
127,657
72,421
79,646
48,011
62°
21 SUPPLIES
5,000
7,500
3,895
1,105
7K
22 SMALL EQUIPMENT
141,300
94,263
23,871
117,429
179
23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
171,460
68,799
31,790
139,670
199
24 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
48,743
53,467
5,303
91°
25 TRAVEL
1,500
207
-
1,500
0�
26 RENTAL/LEASE
7,400
6,149
6,081
1,319
829
27 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
302,660
282,519
282,544
20,116
939
28 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
11,415
1,356
3,644
279
29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
56,000
-
-
56,000
0�
$
1,257,909
$
807,205
$
711,971
$
545,938
57
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
31 BENEFITS
$
24,560
$
14,405
$
15,625
$
8,935
649
32 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
70,407
46,359
47,974
22,433
6K
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,200
1,007
11,500
(10,300)
95K
$
96,167
$
61,772
$
75,099
$
21,068
7K
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
132,008,554
$
69,494,651
$
67,389,167
$
64,619,387
5V
O
Q.
d
<0
C
ca
C
LL
L
d
R
7
Cl
T-
N
O
N
4)
M
E
d
Q.
N
1n
29
Packet Pg. 284
8.9.a
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2021 Amended 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PARKS & RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
$ 432,478 $
239,066 $
247,315 $
185,163
57%
345,501
249,862
249,093
96,408
72%
837,176
476,486
506,717
330,459
61%
_
1,166,183
775,370
857,840
308,343
74%
0
0.
757,055
554,592
444,121
312,934
59%
a)
lY
1,118,378
1,050,712
990,749
127,629
89%
to
t�
936,480
646,093
632,249
304,231
68%
C
12,881,593
8,970,365
8,838,355
4,043,238
69%
LL
12,217,071
8,693,795
8,445,438
3,771,633
69%
624,198
408,834
427,478
196,720
68%
7
3,585,738
2,083,333
2,183,294
1,402,444
61%
Cy
T_
599,402
-
51,919
547,483
9%
o
N
4,729,281
2,706,435
3,252,343
1,476,938
69%
3,305,285
2,368,826
2,364,647
940,638
72%
E
d
2,442,899
1,875,737
1,840,452
602,447
75%
.r
N
$ 45,978,718 $
31,099,506 $
31,332,012 $
14,646,706
68%
CITY OF E DMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
9/30/2020
Expenditures
9/30/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
WATER UTILITYFUND
$ 10,760,050
$ 8,102,729
$ 6,552,692
$ 4,207,358
61%
STORM UTILITY FUND
7,293,890
6,252,778
3,265,985
4,027,905
45%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
40,492,284
14,546,529
18,442,716
22,049,568
46%
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
30%
$ 60,532,094
$ 29,518,578
$ 28,861,809
$ 31,670,285
48%
30
Packet Pg. 285
I 8.9.a I
Page 1 of 2
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
9/30/2020
Expenditures
9/30/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
200,052
$
142,751
$
150,312
$
49,740
75%
BENEFITS
118,713
73,981
77,903
40,810
66%
SUPPLIES
2,000
1,681
1,808
192
90%
SERVICES
111,713
20,653
17,291
94,422
15%
$
432,479
$
239,066
$
247,315
$
185,163
57%
O FFIC E O F MAYO R
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
229,512
$
167,820
$
172,424
$
57,088
75%
BENEFITS
85,243
63,440
61,843
23,400
73%
SUPPLIES
1,500
4,912
358
1,142
24%
SERVICES
29,246
13,691
14,468
14,778
49%
$
345,501
$
249,862
$
249,093
$
96,408
72%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
387,048
$
269,941
$
273,622
$
113,426
71%
BENEFITS
154,430
107,586
103,804
50,626
67%
SUPPLIES
13,600
4,383
1,271
12,329
9%
SERVICES
282,098
94,575
128,020
154,078
45%
$
837,176
$
476,486
$
506,717
$
330,459
61%
MUNICIPAL C O URT
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
651,967
$
473,442
$
509,139
$
142,828
78%
BENEFITS
243,859
175,867
167,030
76,829
68%
SUPPLIES
11,600
12,067
5,085
6,515
44%
SERVICES
235,637
113,994
176,586
59,051
75%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
23,120
0%
$
1,166,183
$
775,370
$
857,840
$
308,343
74%
C ITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
397,226
$
303,305
$
201,172
$
196,054
51%
BENEFITS
169,669
122,903
80,791
88,878
48%
SUPPLIES
7,000
4,143
3,054
3,946
44%
SERVICES
183,160
124,242
159,105
24,055
87%
$
757,055
$
554,592
$
444,121
$
312,934
59%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
748,408
$
750,844
$
673,559
$
74,849
90%
BENEFITS
240,564
202,703
215,185
25,379
89%
SUPPLIES
10,000
3,287
4,473
5,527
45%
SERVICES
119,406
93,877
97,532
21,874
82%
$
1,118,378
$
1,050,712
$
990,749
$
127,629
89%
CITY ATPO RNEY
SERVICES
$
936,480
$
646,093
$
632,249
$
304,231
68%
$
936,480
$
646,093
$
632,249
$
304,231
68%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS
50,000
1,254
26,878
23,122
54%
SUPPLIES
5,000
3,867
4,447
553
89%
SERVICES
11,681,233
8,371,926
8,461,998
3,219,235
72%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
982,880
524,033
284,945
697,935
29%
DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL
54,530
-
-
54,530
0%
DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST
6,200
69,285
60,087
(53,887)
969%
$
12,881,593
$
8,970,365
$
8,838,355
$
4,043,238
69%
PO LIC E SERVIC ES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
8,149,422
$
5,602,427
$
5,624,790
$
2,524,632
69%
BENEFITS
2,979,421
2,128,308
1,991,277
988,144
67%
SUPPLIES
169,453
159,810
164,291
5,162
97%
SERVICES
918,775
803,250
665,080
253,695
72%
$
12,217,071
$
8,693,795
$
8,445,438
$
3,771,633
69%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
312,977
$
240,495
$
223,670
$
89,307
71%
BENEFITS
91,455
69,485
67,636
23,819
74%
SUPPLIES
3,075
10,147
999
2,076
32%
SERVICES
216,691
88,707
135,173
81,518
62%
$
624,198
$
408,834
$
427,478
$
196,720
68%
O
C.
d
2
U
C
O
C
LL
L
d
R
7
Cl
T_
N
O
N
L
O
E
d
.r
Q.
N
to
31
Packet Pg. 286 1
Page 2 of 2
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2021 Amended
9/30/2020
9/30/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 1,847,848
$ 1,295,264
$ 1,357,118
$ 490,730
73%
BENEFITS
685,121
466,569
470,912
214,209
69%
SUPPLIES
19,400
7,694
6,398
13,002
33%
SERVICES
1,033,369
313,806
348,867
684,502
34%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
0%
$ 3,585,738
$ 2,083,333
$ 2,183,294
$ 1,402,444
61%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
79,510
$
$
32,445
$
47,065
41%
BENEFITS
18,392
-
7,121
11,271
39%
SUPPLIES
1,500
-
11,850
(10,350)
790%
SERVICES
500,000
-
503
499,497
0%
599,402
S
51,919
547,483
9%
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
2,329,689
$
1,454,524
$
1,737,024
$
592,665
75%
BENEFITS
828,746
550,762
610,961
217,785
74%
SUPPLIES
138,790
122,175
142,878
(4,088)
103%
SERVICES
1,432,056
569,921
761,479
670,577
53%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
9,053
-
-
0%
$
4,729,281
$
2,706,435
$
3,252,343
$
1,476,938
69%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINIS TRATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
300,162
$
223,533
$
226,292
$
73,870
75%
BENEFITS
106,903
79,052
78,349
28,554
73%
SUPPLIES
9,600
3,612
7,573
2,027
79%
SERVICES
95,588
75,969
66,749
28,839
70%
$
512,253
$
382,165
$
378,963
$
133,290
74%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES
791,470
591,782
598,185
193,285
76%
BENEFITS
360,720
265,118
253,508
107,212
70%
SUPPLIES
115,000
117,528
152,853
(37,853)
133%
SERVICES
1,175,709
901,309
835,907
339,803
71%
$
2,442,899
$
1,875,737
$
1,840,452
$
602,447
75%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,791,020
$
1,306,914
$
1,313,246
$
477,774
73%
BENEFITS
736,237
526,712
517,374
218,863
70%
SUPPLIES
2,200
868
1,937
263
88%
SERVICES
263,575
152,167
153,126
110,449
58%
$
2,793,032
$
1,986,661
$
1,985,684
$
807,348
71%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$
45,978,718
$
31,099,506
$
31,332,012
$
14,646,706
68%
O
Q.
C
C
LL
L
d
R
7
Cl
F
N
O
N
4)
M
E
d
Q.
N
Cn
32
Packet Pg. 287
8.9.a
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
& SUBFUNDS
9/30/2021 9/30/2021
Q3 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
0
001-General Fund
$ 12,823,410 $ 6,649,293
$ 5,729,329 $ (1,045,336 007
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
331,606 331,607
(41,666.00) (205,570
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
1,782,149 1,782,150
- -
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
19,688 19,689
2,500.00 2,500 c
016-Building Maintenance
210,221 210,221
- - L,
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
848,617 848,616
(15,999.00) (15,999 `m
1`
Total General Fund & Subfunds
$ 16,015,692 $ 9,841,575
$ 5,674,164 $ (1,264,405
*$2,000,000 of the General Fund Balance has been assigned by management for the development of Civic Field. CY
T_
N
*$7,267,031of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,768,863 balance in Fund 012, represent the required 20% N
L
operating reserve.
E
m
a
a�
U)
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
1=
0
21
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES 3
CY
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ---- N
GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
9/30/2021 9/30/2021
c
Q3 YTD N
Fund Balance Cash Balance
L
E
General Fund & Subfunds
$ 16,015,692 $ 9,841,575
$ 5,674,164 $ (1,416,431 a
Special Revenue
19,966,949 18,148,809
6,539,428 8,976,748 to
Capital Projects
6,291,206 6,099,481
W
5,648 137,696
Total Governmental Funds
$ 42,273,846 $ 34,089,865
$ 12,219,240 $ 7,698,012 E
E
0
U
r
c
m
E
t
.r
r
a
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
33
Packet Pg. 288
8.9.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
GOVERNMENTAL
SPECIAL REVENUE
9/30/2021
9/30/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 76,172
$ 75,784
$ 847 $
1,869 p
111 - Street Fund
881,591
726,987
128,731
(256,819
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve
2,492,912
1,497,752
(339,401)
411,249
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
680,169
675,565
8,487
(2,558 2
U
118 - Memorial Street Tree
20,726
20,589
230
508 r-
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
81,293
73,741
1,808
14,372
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
93,097
92,375
2,222
LL
11,099 >,
122 -Youth Scholarship Fund
14,289
14,197
157
462
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
100,199
97,359
6,032
19,861 _
125 - Real Estate Tax2
4,066,492
3,752,351
454,119
1,494,511 CY
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1
3,553,874
3,237,258
293,294
1,243,706 N
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
314,382
312,373
(19,419)
16,318 N
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
252,276
248,242
6,871
47,149 -
136 - Parks Trust Fund
170,826
169,701
1,896
4,188 E
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,117,256
1,109,908
18,839
27,396 +)
138- Sister City Comm ission
13,140
13,069
2,618
2,776 0
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
43,290
43,291
7,327
24,139 U)
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing Fd
134,271
127,575
18,220
55,830 r
142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
1 5,860,693
5,860,693
1 5,946,550
5,860,693 0-
Total Special Revenue
$ 19,966,949
$ 18,148,809
1 $ 6,539,428 $
8,976,748 W
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for L
the purchase of Open Space.
0
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEWCY
N
O
N
L
E
FUND BALANCES
Y
CHANGE IN FUND m
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
a)
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
9/30/2021
9/30/2021
Q3
YTD y
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
Q-
E
0
421 -Water Utility Fund
$ 27,265,840
$ 6,093,900
$ (225,432) $
1,566,188 V
422 -Storm Utility Fund *
15,607,760
6,306,747
(111,081)
r
2,017,071
423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund
52,787,795
19,469,422
(3,586,284)
389,367 E
424 - Bond Reserve Fund
843,969
843,969
2
8 M
411 -Combined Utility Operation
5,880
46,122
5,070
r
5,880 Q
Total Enterprise Funds
$ 96,511,244
$ 32,760,161
$ (3,917,725) $
3,978,515
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
34
Packet Pg. 289
8.9.a
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
CITY-WIDE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
9/30/2021 9/30/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
0
Governmental Funds
$ 42,273,846 $ 34,089,865
$
12,219,240 $
7,698,012 m
Enterprise Funds
96,511,244 32,760,161
(3,917,725)
3,978,515
Internal Services Fund
10,342,204 5,809,779
209,624
387,785
Agency Funds
60,016 60,016
(17,311)
(75,099 c
Total City-wide Total
$ 149,187,311 $ 72,719,821
$
8,493,828 $
11,989,213 LL,
L
L
a
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
r
N
N
L
E
d
Q
U)
L
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND 0
a
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
9/30/2021 9/30/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
CY
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
$ 9,285,295 $ 4,859,031
$
71,375 $
181,499 c
N
512 -Technology Rental Fund
1,056,909 950,748
138,249
206,286 L
m
Total Internal Service Funds
$ 10,342,204 $ 5,809,779
$
209,624 $
387,785
aEi
a
m
a�
a�
E
0
U
r
c
m
E
t
0
.r
r
a
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual
cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
35
Packet Pg. 290
8.9.b
GENERAL FUND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
2020 2021
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Jan -Sept) (Jan -Sept)
Beginning Fund Balance 9,359,435 9,841,718 10,273,343 11,233,278 15,552,187 15,552,187 13,868,746
Revenue
Taxes
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines and forfeitures
Investment earnings
Miscellaneous
Operating Revenues
Nononeratine Revenues
Transfers in
Debt proceeds
Sale of capital assets
Insurance recoveries
Total Revenue
Expenditures
General government
Public safety
Transportation
Economic environment
Mental and physical health
Culture and recreation
Debt service
Capital outlay
29,403,794
29,572,203
30,755,578
30,846,665
30,738,451
19,831,968
21,665,911
2,269,313
2,506,800
2,401,855
2,299,972
2,276,861
1,709,258
1,785,653
1,261,998
890,572
1,014,434
1,008,432
1,633,633
783,705
1,309,318
5,403,786
5,463,913
5,810,961
6,419,836
5,412,044
3,971,068
4,613,516
522,051
459,929
616,783
496,093
287,693
224,158
239,018
(26,712)
154,739
273,226
573,806
265,631
269,313
252,014
441,432
471,675
931,495
587,882
322,816
172,214
256,069
39,275,661 39,519,831 41,804,331 42,232,687 40,937,130 26,961,685 30,121,500
82,695 26,300 75,884 4,793,650 1,535,800 17,900 165,176
549,095 - - - - -
58,451 7,143 5,273 - - -
- - 15,570 - 16,977 - -
39,965,902 39,553,274 41,901,058 47,026,337 42,489,907 26,979,585 30,286,676
9,969,187
9,714,867
10,288,694
11,565,563
12,302,936
8,910,091
8,978,567
20,128,896
22,228,871
22,585,212
23,036,185
23,760,951
17,466,356
17,365,984
3,600
3,600
4,779
5,012
5,012
4,177
1,671
1,313,430
1,551,152
1,460,763
1,562,702
1,675,334
1,219,800
1,353,579
70,814
126,791
178,859
164,888
357,808
199,302
34,808
3,773,633
3,959,731
4,331,806
4,158,397
3,732,644
2,772,409
3,302,370
196,663
198,361
197,694
197,967
296,624
69,285
60,087
56,662
90,573
93,105
110,935
835,049
9,053
-
Operating Expenditures 35,512,885 37,873,946 39,140,912 40,801,649 42,966,358 30,650,473 31,097,067
Nononeratine Expenditures
Transfers out
3,414,141
1,247,703
1,800,212
1,905,778
1,206,990
449,033
234,945
Debt refunding
556,593
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures
39,483,619
39,121,649
40,941,124
42,707,427
44,173,348
31,099,506
31,332,012
Prior Period Adjustments
-
-
-
-
-
Change in position
482,283
431,625
959,934
4,318,910
(1,683,442)
(4,119,921)
(1,045,336)
Ending Fund Balance
9,841,718
10,273,343
11,233,278
15,552,187
13,868,746
11,432,266
12,823,410
O
O.
O
2
c
M
c
U-
21
L
M
M
Or
N
0
N
L
d
E
O
G.
d
N
J
06
(L
N
O
N
r+
CL
4)
co
C
M
n
C
d
E
t
U
2
a
\\edmsvr-deptfs\finance\Finance Committee\2021\Jan-Sept 2021 P&L 11/30/2021 Packet Pg. 291
8.10
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
October 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
October 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Attachments:
October 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Packet Pg. 292
1 8.10.a I
OF
EDP
� d
lac. 1SOV
CITY OF EDMONDS
MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
OCTOBER 2021
Packet Pg. 293 1
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
1 8.10.a I
General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months)
General Fund Revenue General Fund Expenses
10,000, 000
9,000,000
8,000,000 —�
7,000, 000
it
6,000,000 •
5,000,000
4,000, 000
3,000,000
2,000, 000 —- — - - - —- ••�-
1,000, 000
October January April July October January
0
Q.
d
c
0
c
U.
21
t
c
0
2
T
N
O
N
General Fund Tax Revenue (2015 through 2020)
0
r
- - Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes v
O
12,000,000 r_
0
10,000, 000 0-
0
8,000,000 - - —— — — — ---- — w
6,000,000
c
4,000,000 c
2,000,000 ii�
- � z
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0
r
N
General Fund Tax Revenue (2021 YTD)
10,000,000
$8,493,819
9,000,000
8,000, 000
7,000, 000 $6,507,446
6,000, 000
5,000, 000
4,000,000
3,000,000 -Ell
2,000, 000
1,000, 000
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
Q
1
I Packet Pg. 294
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 2,289,445
$ 2,289,445
$ 2,740,276
19.69%
February
4,618,128
2,328,683
5,089,278
10.20%
March
7,113,927
2,495,798
7,050,949
-0.89%
April
10,184,627
3,070,700
11,029,475
8.30%
May
18,392,023
8,207,396
20,122,774
9.41%
June
20,805,873
2,413,850
22,872,014
9.93%
July
23,101,736
2,295,863
25,583,320
10.74%
August
25,640,292
2,538,556
28,113,466
9.65%
September
27,907,833
2,267,540
30,286,676
8.52%
October
31,778,772
3,870,940
33,150,199
4.32%
November
40,146,024
8,367,252
December
42,490,777
2,344,753
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2021
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 195,748
$ 195,748
$ 625,840
219.72%
February
341,557
145,810
922,678
170.14%
March
525,343
183,786
1,222,093
132.63%
April
697,989
172,646
1,478,072
111.76
May
895,413
197,424
1,949,651
117.74%
June
1,120,061
224,648
2,330,065
108.03%
July
1,335,075
215,015
2,879,064
115.65%
August
1,581,214
246,138
3,453,870
118.43%
September
1,849,736
268,522
3,818,929
106.46%
October
2,083,774
234,038
4,224,981
102.76%
November
2,308,787
225,013
December
2,500,000
191,213
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2
Packet Pg. 295
1 8.10.a I
SALES TAX SUMMARY
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: October 2021
Year -to -Date
Total $8,493,819
Automotive Repair,
$179,856 Amusement & Business Services,
Construction Trade, Recreation, $45,334 $868,027
$1,264,708 Health & Personal
Accommodation, Care, $221,149
Gasoline, $34,020
$29,652 Retail Food Stores,
Clothing and $283,991
Accessories,$271,360 Retail Automotiv
Communications, $2,104,281
$199,661
Wholesale Trade,
$310,461
Misc Retail, $1,522,046
Manufacturing,
Others, $206,966 $104,942
Eating & Drinldng,
$847,364
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
10,000,000
$8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046 $8,493,819
8,000,000 7 395 114
$6,741,838 $6,905,122
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000, 000
0
201 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
0
c
c
ii
z
c
0
T
N
0
N
L
d
0
O
r-
0
a
c
M
c
ii
z
c
0
r
N
O
N
L
d
0
0
O
c
m
t
v
M
Q
3
Packet Pg. 296
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2021
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 661,963
$ 661,963
$ 774,198
16.95%
February
1,491,081
829,118
1,647,058
10.46%
March
2,110,825
619,744
2,350,659
11.36%
April
2,677,870
567,045
3,041,781
13.59%
May
3,379,279
701,409
3,922,140
16.06%
June
4,038,220
658,941
4,797,214
18.80%
July
4,756,025
717,805
5,699,002
19.83%
August
5,547,915
791,890
6,634,250
19.58%
September
6,288,480
740,565
7,479,695
18.94%
October
7,063,515
775,035
8,493,819
20.25%
November
7,866,501
802,986
December
8,600,000
733,499
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2021
Gas Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 82,557
$ 82,557
$ 84,132
1.91%
February
170,654
88,097
172,999
1.37%
March
250,947
80,292
269,171
7.26%
April
317,447
66,501
350,366
10.37%
May
368,586
51,139
413,190
12.10%
June
403,108
34,522
453,419
12.48%
July
430,884
27,777
489,128
13.52%
August
454,299
23,415
512,233
12.75%
September
475,121
20,822
535,887
12.79%
October
498,594
23,472
565,388
13.40%
November
537,295
38,702
December
595,000
57,705
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
Q.
d
M
C
C
E
21
t
a
O
2
T
N
O
N
L
d
O
v
O
r_
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
L
d
O
V
O
a
a)
E
t
C�
M
Q
4
Packet Pg. 297
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2021
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
69,351 $
69,351 $
56,592
-18.40%
February
138,426
69,074
85,370
-38.33%
March
199,085
60,660
140,907
-29.22%
April
265,909
66,823
190,824
-28.24%
May
325,636
59,728
218,932
-32.77%
June
385,177
59,540
274,873
-28.64%
July
443,946
58,770
322,813
-27.29%
August
501,501
57,554
365,431
-27.13%
September
557,882
56,382
391,086
-29.90%
October
615,320
57,437
452,939
-26.39%
November
665,999
50,679
December
723,000
57,001
Electric Utility Tax
800,000
Telephone Utility Tax
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
179,984 $
379,889
546,637
730,293
873,813
997,568
1,114,337
1,230,154
1,342,671
1,453,976
1,576,729
1,710,000
179,984 $ 192,356
199,905 367,328
166,748 537,433
183,656 721,208
143,520 872,875
123,755 987,183
116,769 1,105,355
115,816 1,217,532
112,517 1,330,863
111,305 1,439,342
122,753
133,271
6.87
-3.31
-1.68
-1.24
-0.11
-1.04
-0.81
-1.03
-0.88
-1.01
Electric Utility Tax
1,zsuu,uuu
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
5
Packet Pg. 298
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2021
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 779,311
$ 779,311
$ 785,708
0.82%
February
1,323,513
544,201
1,376,327
3.99%
March
2,123,378
799,865
2,200,360
3.63%
April
2,634,733
511,355
2,730,111
3.62%
May
3,397,533
762,799
3,527,366
3.82%
June
3,993,888
596,356
4,181,353
4.69%
July
4,928,107
934,219
5,161,097
4.73%
August
5,728,520
800,414
6,057,803
5.75%
September
6,831,863
1,103,343
7,158,105
4.78%
October
7,628,547
796,684
7,904,214
3.61%
November
8,538,589
910,042
December
9,090,825
552,236
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2021
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 384,276
$ 384,276
$ 377,845
6.87%
February
1,216,009
831,732
1,205,144
-3.31%
March
1,599,504
383,495
1,586,561
-1.68%
April
1,939,303
339,799
1,926,094
-1.24%
May
2,323,204
383,901
2,307,849
-0.11%
June
2,663,931
340,727
2,647,822
-1.04%
July
3,048,086
384,154
2,994,340
-1.76%
August
3,880,066
831,980
3,819,514
-1.56%
September
4,263,771
383,706
4,201,629
-1.46%
October
4,604,458
340,687
4,540,958
-1.38%
November
4,988,465
384,006
December
5,316,477
328,012
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
6
Packet Pg. 299
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2021
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 846,742
$ 846,742
$ 806,699
-4.73%
February
1,539,036
692,295
1,482,613
-3.67%
March
2,387,119
848,083
2,293,552
-3.92%
April
3,078,705
691,586
2,976,527
-3.32%
May
3,923,269
844,563
3,802,264
-3.08%
June
4,616,005
692,736
4,493,851
-2.65%
July
5,485,907
869,902
5,279,791
-3.76%
August
6,180,993
695,086
5,974,891
-3.33%
September
7,065,967
884,974
6,845,543
-3.12%
October
7,769,759
703,792
7,541,945
-2.93%
November
8,630,384
860,626
December
9,319,928
689,544
Unmeter Sewer Sales
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000 —
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
i
Q
7
Packet Pg. 300
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2021
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
4,857,910 $
4,857,910
$ 4,488,492
-7.60%
February
8,261,965
3,404,055
7,637,016
-7.56%
March
11,777,095
3,515,130
11,022,804
-6.40%
April
15,271,601
3,494,506
14,232,961
-6.80%
May
18,532,065
3,260,463
17,443,966
-5.87%
June
22,743,931
4,211,866
21,115,256
-7.16%
July
26,619,595
3,875,664
24,346,357
-8.54%
August
30,304,305
3,684,709
27,848,489
-8.10%
September
33,745,872
3,441,567
31,332,012
-7.15%
October
37,541,292
3,795,420
34,558,991
-7.94%
November
41,637,296
4,096,003
December
46,099,647
4,462,351
Non -Departmental
General Fund
,000,000
,000,000
16,000,000
12,000,000
8,000,000
4,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*--Current Year Budget -Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 2,130,566
$ 2,130,566
$ 2,013,112
-5.51%
February
2,963,078
832,512
2,845,113
-3.98%
March
3,917,369
954,291
3,679,050
-6.08%
April
4,745,926
828,556
4,484,023
-5.52%
May
5,426,477
680,552
5,278,401
-2.73%
June
6,887,081
1,460,603
6,412,264
-6.89%
July
7,925,195
1,038,115
7,203,386
-9.11%
August
8,791,207
866,012
8,115,624
-7.68%
September
9,531,703
740,496
8,838,355
-7.27%
October
10,445,987
914,284
9,614,308
-7.96%
November
11,570,251
1,124,264
December
12,906,593
1,336,342
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
Packet Pg. 301
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2021
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
27,295 $
27,295 $
26,808
-1.79%
February
57,824
30,529
53,681
-7.17%
March
91,440
33,616
83,267
-8.94%
April
122,323
30,882
110,738
-9.47%
May
163,149
40,826
137,169
-15.92%
June
212,026
48,877
164,613
-22.36%
July
246,267
34,241
192,621
-21.78%
August
293,761
47,494
219,652
-25.23%
September
333,076
39,315
247,315
-25.75%
October
357,472
24,396
273,284
-23.55%
November
393,733
36,262
December
432,478
38,745
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2021
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
28,543 $
28,543 $
27,531 -3.55%
February
58,378
29,835
55,740 -4.52%
March
86,855
28,477
83,532 -3.83%
April
115,847
28,992
111,352 -3.88%
May
144,377
28,530
138,910 -3.79%
June
172,357
27,980
166,677 -3.30%
July
200,988
28,631
194,309 -3.32%
August
230,481
29,494
221,858 -3.74%
September
259,088
28,607
249,093 -3.86%
October
287,175
28,087
276,714 -3.64%
November
315,280
28,104
December
345,501
30,221
Office of Mayor
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
l
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAX JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-CunentYeaz Budget •PriorYeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
Q.
d
M
C
C
LL
21
t
a
O
2
T
N
O
N
L
(v
O
v
O
r_
O
CL
C
M
c
LL
21
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
d
O
V
O
a
O
E
s
M
Q
9
Packet Pg. 302
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2021
Human Resources
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 73,271
$ 73,271
$ 75,120
2.52%
February
138,790
65,519
132,066
-4.84%
March
202,112
63,322
187,141
-7.41%
April
262,791
60,679
252,612
-3.87%
May
326,332
63,541
319,298
-2.16%
June
403,462
77,130
368,323
-8.71%
July
464,647
61,185
419,004
-9.82%
August
528,490
63,843
462,324
-12.52%
September
598,547
70,057
506,717
-15.34%
October
664,032
65,485
554,503
-16.49%
November
731,681
67,649
December
837,176
105,495
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2021
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 88,422
$ 88,422
$ 93,953
6.26%
February
185,102
96,680
183,450
-0.89%
March
279,267
94,165
275,717
-1.27%
April
374,976
95,709
359,370
-4.16%
May
477,911
102,935
445,221
-6.84%
June
568,960
91,049
535,746
-5.84%
July
663,035
94,076
622,191
-6.16%
August
760,661
97,626
749,313
-1.49%
September
855,256
94,594
857,840
0.30%
October
954,530
99,275
955,506
0.10%
November
1,047,855
93,324
December
1,166,183
118,328
Municipal Court
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
200,00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
Q.
d
M
C
tQ
C
LL
21
t
a
O
2
T
N
O
N
L
(v
O
v
O
r_
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
L
d
O
V
O
C
t
C�
M
Q
10
Packet Pg. 303
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2021
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
41,233 $
41,233 $
43,221
4.82%
February
88,221
46,989
85,831
-2.71%
March
135,256
47,034
130,319
-3.65%
April
184,259
49,003
157,909
-14.30%
May
233,650
49,391
198,730
-14.95%
June
281,295
47,646
263,632
-6.28%
July
332,496
51,200
308,903
-7.10%
August
387,551
55,056
366,310
-5.48%
September
434,722
47,170
427,478
-1.67%
October
487,409
52,687
473,861
-2.78%
November
550,406
62,997
December
624,198
73,792
City Clerk
Community Services/Economic Development
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget -0-- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk
2021
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 73,276
$ 73,276
$ 78,859
7.62%
February
133,953
60,677
139,396
4.06%
March
196,194
62,241
209,183
6.62%
April
261,901
65,707
272,337
3.98%
May
322,071
60,170
328,247
1.92%
June
380,379
58,308
351,029
-7.72%
July
444,659
64,280
363,075
-18.35%
August
511,894
67,234
408,783
-20.14%
September
567,756
55,862
444,121
-21.78%
October
625,324
57,568
475,376
-23.98%
November
692,090
66,766
December
757,055
64,965
City Clerk
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000,
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
Q.
d
C
C
LL
21
t
C
O
2
T
N
O
N
L
d
O
v
O
r_
O
CL
C
M
c
LL
z
r
C
O
r
N
O
N
d
O
V
O
C
lv
E
s
M
Q
11
Packet Pg. 304
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2021
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
136,722 $
136,722 $
117,002
-14.42%
February
290,515
153,792
168,294
-42.07%
March
386,224
95,709
350,229
-9.32%
April
453,827
67,604
404,389
-10.89%
May
542,997
89,170
460,963
-15.11%
June
634,330
91,333
519,736
-18.07%
July
713,918
79,588
572,585
-19.80%
August
806,613
92,695
642,362
-20.36%
September
902,103
95,490
711,971
-21.08%
October
985,360
83,257
944,850
-4.11%
November
1,067,005
81,645
December
1,257,909
190,904
Finance
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
123,076 $
123,076
$ 137,736
11.91%
February
213,593
90,517
226,074
5.84%
March
305,354
91,762
314,260
2.92%
April
398,335
92,980
402,835
1.13%
May
491,716
93,382
490,038
-0.34%
June
607,431
115,714
625,371
2.95%
July
706,168
98,737
766,314
8.52%
August
796,996
90,828
875,083
9.80%
September
899,375
102,379
990,749
10.16%
October
994,272
94,897
1,115,329
12.18%
November
1,085,877
91,605
December
1,178,545
92,668
Administrative Services
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 1
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
12
Packet Pg. 305
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2021
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
78,040 $
78,040 $
69,941
-10.38%
February
156,080
78,040
142,526
-8.68%
March
234,120
78,040
212,467
-9.25%
April
312,160
78,040
282,407
-9.53%
May
390,200
78,040
352,348
-9.70%
June
468,240
78,040
404,226
-13.67%
July
546,280
78,040
492,368
-9.87%
August
624,320
78,040
562,309
-9.93%
September
702,360
78,040
632,249
-9.98%
October
780,400
78,040
702,190
-10.02%
November
858,440
78,040
December
936,480
78,040
Police
City Attorney
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-- Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
948,663 $
948,663
$ 992,942
4.67%
February
1,933,831
985,168
1,856,572
-4.00%
March
2,901,114
967,283
2,871,535
-1.02%
April
3,878,067
976,953
3,802,023
-1.96%
May
4,844,411
966,345
4,751,092
-1.93%
June
5,873,421
1,029,009
5,731,600
-2.41%
July
6,905,785
1,032,364
6,626,850
-4.04%
August
7,852,686
946,901
7,550,794
-3.84%
September
8,847,063
994,377
8,445,438
-4.54%
October
9,934,749
1,087,687
9,394,444
-5.44%
November
11,184,244
1,249,495
December
12,217,071
1,032,827
Police
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"- Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
13
Packet Pg. 306
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2021
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
258,603 $
258,603
$ 219,157
-15.25%
February
543,028
284,425
448,394
-17.43%
March
826,331
283,303
690,769
-16.41%
April
1,128,019
301,688
934,573
-17.15%
May
1,433,846
305,827
1,185,423
-17.33%
June
1,715,744
281,899
1,471,283
-14.25%
July
2,020,389
304,645
1,730,845
-14.33%
August
2,331,583
311,194
1,960,572
-15.91%
September
2,632,785
301,202
2,183,294
-17.07%
October
2,927,354
294,569
2,430,629
-16.97%
November
3,269,474
342,120
December
3,621,500
352,026
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
319,744 $
319,744
$ 308,283
-3.58%
February
651,727
331,983
655,977
0.65%
March
1,004,599
352,872
971,861
-3.26%
April
1,371,174
366,574
1,273,239
-7.14%
May
1,749,534
378,360
1,604,251
-8.30%
June
2,129,825
380,291
2,002,869
-5.96%
July
2,608,624
478,799
2,366,948
-9.26%
August
3,159,845
551,221
2,760,446
-12.64%
September
3,607,041
447,196
3,252,343
-9.83%
October
3,989,956
382,916
3,577,972
-10.33%
November
4,323,317
333,361
December
4,729,281
405,964
Parks & Recreation
4,000,000
3,500,000
11500,000
1,000,000
500,000
I row'-
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
14
Packet Pg. 307
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2021
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
42,089 $
42,089 $
40,605
-3.53%
February
84,997
42,908
81,720
-3.86%
March
127,527
42,530
123,465
-3.19%
April
170,261
42,734
170,658
0.23%
May
213,078
42,817
212,461
-0.29%
June
256,751
43,673
254,025
-1.06%
July
300,611
43,860
297,102
-1.17%
August
343,101
42,490
337,783
-1.55%
September
385,406
42,305
378,963
-1.67%
October
426,793
41,387
419,569
-1.69%
November
468,729
41,936
December
512,253
43,524
Facilities Maintenance
Public Works Administration
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2021
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
167,724 $
167,724
$ 142,909
-14.80%
February
348,879
181,155
294,332
-15.63%
March
533,264
184,385
528,741
-0.85%
April
706,629
173,365
711,450
0.68%
May
894,239
187,611
856,587
-4.21%
June
1,043,804
149,565
989,625
-5.19%
July
1,223,905
180,101
1,170,492
-4.36%
August
1,414,941
191,036
1,445,505
2.16%
September
1,622,246
207,305
1,840,452
13.45%
October
1,898,737
276,491
2,031,188
6.98%
November
2,125,911
227,174
December
2,442,899
316,988
Facilities Maintenance
11,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
15
Packet Pg. 308
1 8.10.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2021
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 212,668 $
212,668
$ 218,316
2.66%
February
423,271
210,602
436,144
3.04%
March
652,974
229,703
661,498
1.31%
April
890,809
237,835
888,001
-0.32%
May
1,130,883
240,074
1,122,224
-0.77%
June
1,371,946
241,063
1,346,241
-1.87%
July
1,617,159
245,213
1,560,038
-3.53%
August
1,869,308
252,149
1,770,434
-5.29%
September
2,101,156
231,848
1,985,684
-5.50%
October
2,337,410
236,254
2,197,742
-5.98%
November
2,559,700
222,290
December
2,793,032
233,332
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
21000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
16
Packet Pg. 309
1 8.10.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment
Portfolio Detail
As of October 31, 2021
Years
Agency/
Investment
Purchase
to
Par
Market
Maturity
Coupon
Issuer
Type
Price
Maturity
Value
Value
Date
Rate
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
410,553
0.17
405,000
406,029
01/01/22
1.79%
FFCB
Bonds
1,998,548
0.62
2,000,000
2,021,896
06/14/22
1.88%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
1,466,077
0.67
1,345,000
1,388,134
07/01/22
5.00%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
260,748
0.67
250,000
254,558
07/01/22
2.95%
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Bonds
948,084
1.08
855,000
898,759
12/01/22
5.00%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
1,517,955
1.17
1,500,000
1,519,605
01/01/23
1.54%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
576,332
1.17
520,000
548,745
01/01/23
5.00%
Seattle WA Muni
Bonds
2,224,500
1.25
2,000,000
2,119,340
02/01/23
5.00%
FHLB
Bonds
1,996,590
1.93
2,000,000
1,995,300
10/05/23
0.22%
First Financial - ECA
CD
2,803,516
2.04
2,803,516
2,803,516
11/15/23
2.08%
Kent WA
Bonds
286,648
2.08
250,000
274,325
12/01/23
5.00%
Spokane County WA
Bonds
259,075
3.09
250,000
259,288
12/01/24
2.10%
First Financial - Waterfront Center
CD
2,000,000
6.01
2,000,000
2,000,000
11/01/27
0.25%
TOTAL SECURITIES
16,748,624
1.69
16,178,516
16,489,494
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
22,558,546
22,558,546
Demand
0.09%
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment
Pool
32,372,508
32,372,508
Demand
1.10%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
$
71,109,570 $
71,420,548
Issuer Diversification Seattle
Kent WA, WA
2% Muni,
Mason & 12%
Kitsap Cnty Firs
WA, 5% Financial -
CD, 30%
Grant Cnty
WA, 15%
FFCB, FHLB, Spokane
12% 12% CountyEnergy
WA, +Y®rthwest,
10%
Cash and Investment Balances Checki ng,
(in $ Millions) �$2.2 , 3%
Bonds,
$11.4, 15%
CD's, $4.8, State LGIP,
7% $22.6, 31%
County
LGIP,
$32.4, 44%
17
Packet Pg. 310 1
1 8.10.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,236,875
$1,200,000
$1,000, 000 $947,931
827,806
$800,000
$635,781
$600,000 423,799
$400,000
$200,000
$-
2016 7 2018 2019 2020 YTD 2021
18
Packet Pg. 311
1 8.10.a I
Page 1 of 1
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Receive
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 42,490,777
$ 30,980,306
$ 33,150,199
$ 9,340,578
78
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
300,000
425,000
-
300,000
0
011
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
25,000
-
-
25,000
0
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
2,620
-
-
2,620
0
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,010
5,000
2,500
2,510
50
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
-
100
150
(150)
0 G
Q.
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
165,370
64,445
1,966
163,404
1
�
111
STREET FUND
1,722,360
1,665,560
1,435,770
286,590
83 ii
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
3,068,385
1,751,291
2,000,078
1,068,307
65
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
165,060
76,399
46,663
118,397
28 C
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
270
462
406
(136)
150 �%
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
71,460
54,330
65,811
5,649
92
C
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
25,240
12,288
12,583
12,657
50 0
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,390
341
555
835
40 r
N
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
24,000
18,709
23,594
406
98 N
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
1,282,050
1,345,695
2,194,260
(912,210)
171 N
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 t
1,285,240
1,339,547
2,182,715
(897,475)
170 0
c�
127
GIFT S CAT ALOG FUND
103,930
48,393
57,186
46,744
55 O
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
179,800
108,920
216,266
(36,466)
120 r
O
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
2,200
3,809
4,405
(2,205)
200 d
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
29,220
36,168
49,813
(20,593)
170
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,120
264
2,793
7,327
28
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
79,239
70,106
73,543
5,696
C
93 C
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND
65,000
57,837
64,607
393
99 IL
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
5,946,550
852,137
5,991,438
(44,888)
101 s
143
TREE FUND
20,528
-
20,590
(62)
r
100 r-
O
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
759,710
47,291
40,853
718,857
5
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
1,392,520
1,403,521
441,935
950,585
r
32 G
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
31,935
6,240
(6,240)
N
0 i
d
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
10,299,357
8,363,142
8,943,667
1,355,690
87 C
422
STORM UTILITY FUND 2
6,265,225
4,925,043
5,824,915
440,310
93 O
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 3
31,130,450
15,005,131
19,818,999
11,311,451
64 y ;
C
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,552
600,426
1,385,444
30 4)
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,331,100
1,551,455
1,242,353
88,747
93 -Cu
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,204,880
1,004,927
1,019,283
185,597
85 w
Q
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
67,270
54,924
-
67,270
0
$ 111,507,201
$ 71,921,028
$ 85,5369561
$ 25,970,640
77
1 2021 BEET revenues are $1,650,013 higher than 2020 revenues.
2 Difference primarily due to a Grant reimbursement in January 2021, as well as 2021 storm rate increase of 5%
3 Differences primarily due to WWTP billings to their partners in January 2021.
19
rac,ecei Pg. 312
1 8.10.a I
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 46,099,647
$ 35,443,150
$ 34,558,991
$ 11,540,656
759
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
467,140
226,722
227,013
240,127
499
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
-
-
5,900
09
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
210,222
-
210,222
09
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 20,000 16,149 3,851 819
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
123,581
-
123,581
-
1009 C
019
EDMONDSOPIOID RESPONSE FUND
28,445
21,555
28,445
-
1009 d
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
30,332
-
45,800
09
O
III
STREET FUND
2,187,430
1,700,334
1,693,449
493,981
779 0
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
2,862,297
919,137
1,642,307
1,219,990
579 C
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
236,880
28,236
56,435
180,445
249 LL
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
20,528
-
20,487
41
1009
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
87,150
47,329
43,886
43,264
509 p
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
632
1,266
25,614
59
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
450
75
2,925
N
39 N
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
29,900
5,129
2,500
27,400
89 N
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
1,601,298
1,317,203
584,109
1,017,189
369 O
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
2,053,911
1,341,070
901,314
1,152,597
449 O
127
GIFTS CATALOG FUND
100,900
85,183
34,949
65,951
359 r-
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
200,998
148,952
165,690
35,308
829 Q.
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
50,000
-
-
50,000
d
09 w
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND
25,000
19,211
5,789
779 •V
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
11
-
11,900
09
C
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
76,340
49,813
42,087
34,253
559 j,L
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
5,946,550
964,793
628,177
5,318,373
119 s
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
759,700
47,291
40,853
718,847
r
59 C
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
5,552,490
1,136,879
1,145,475
4,407,015
219
421
WATER UTILITYFUND
10,760,050
8,855,472
7,092,861
3,667,189
r
669 c
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
7,293,890
6,660,621
3,589,509
3,704,381
499 i
d
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
40,492,284
15,522,880
21,928,479
18,563,805
549
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
309 O
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,429,954
2,710,622
1,054,526
375,428
749 +;
C
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,257,909
859,114
944,850
313,059
759
0
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
136,167
70,538
83,914
52,253
629 V
$ 132,190,011
$ 78,809,991
$ 77,271,007
$ 54,919,004
589
20
Packet Pg. 313
8.10.a
Page 1 of 3
C TTY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 4
$ 10,936,400
$ 6,022,077
$ 6,119,988
$ 4,816,412
560r
2 EMSPROPERTYTAX4
4,137,031
2,351,276
2,413,236
1,723,795
580r
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
500
26
4
496
10/
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 5
8,600,000
6,719,684
8,493,819
106,181
990/
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
7,600
6,184
9,355
(1,755)
1230/
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
828,500
662,655
780,773
47,727
940/
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
1,710,000
1,430,598
1,439,342
270,658
840/
8 GASUTILITYTAX
595,000
535,796
565,388
29,612
950r
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
364,000
296,691
300,135
63,865
820/
10 WATERUTILITYTAX
1,153,000
911,237
788,393
364,607
680/
11 SEWER UTILITYTAX
894,600
639,822
754,417
140,183
840/
12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX
471,900
417,899
454,627
17,273
960/
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
722,000
668,933
670,379
51,621
930/
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
723,000
579,582
452,939
270,061
630/
15 PULLTABSTAX
55,200
56,617
70,840
(15,640)
1280r
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
350
449
279
71
800/
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
295,900
228,029
220,575
75,325
750/
31,494,981
21,527,554
23,534,489
7,960,492
750i
LICENSES AND PERK :
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
250
315
550
(300)
2200r
19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
700
80
-
700
00/
20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
50,000
10,894
52,459
(2,459)
10501
21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
702,700
678,877
676,727
25,973
960/
22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
41,000
33,381
31,583
9,417
770i
23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER
100,600
56,323
47,179
53,421
470r
24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
434,000
255,690
271,246
162,754
620/
25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
201,000
187,404
194,162
6,838
970/
26 DEVSERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
58,700
61,595
76,265
(17,565)
1300i
27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
30,000
-
21,529
8,471
720i
28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
650,600
558,009
605,697
44,903
930/
29 ANIMAL LICENSES
22,000
9,691
9,826
12,174
450/
30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
50,000
93,536
62,190
(12,190)
1240/
31 OTRNON-BUSLIC/PERMITS
20,000
14,290
16,192
3,808
810/
2,361,550
1,960,085
2,065,604
295,946
870,
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
32 DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE
-
559
-
-
00/
33 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
6,000
2,052
6,464
(464)
1080/
34 TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT
4,000
-
-
4,000
00/
35 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
7,100
1,623
916
6,184
130i
36 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2
-
-
3,947
(3,947)
00/
37 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT
-
-
9,777
(9,777)
00/
38 DOC FAC ROOFING
-
-
379,270
(379,270)
00/
39 WA STATE ART COMMISSION 2021-003-CD
-
-
6,000
(6,000)
00/
40 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
198,000
-
-
198,000
00/
41 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX
210,500
207,989
208,112
2,388
990/
42 2022-2023 BIENNIUM ONE-TIME ALLOCATION
-
-
168,950
(168,950)
00/
43 ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT
-
9,399
-
-
00/
44 STATE GRANT FROM OTHER JUDICIAL AGENCIES
140
-
-
00/
45 SCHOOL ZONE
-
825
-
-
00/
46 CJ-POPULATION
13,070
13,211
13,962
(892)
1070/
47 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
16,740
12,114
12,105
4,635
720i
48 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
45,600
47,280
49,717
(4,117)
1090/
49 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
60,000
50,966
60,515
(515)
1010i
50 DUI - CITIES
4,500
6,129
6,950
(2,450)
1540r
51 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX
-
-
53,334
(53,334)
00/
52 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
261,500
265,801
297,159
(35,659)
1140r
53 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
343,200
253,877
251,697
91,503
730/
54 POLICE TRAINING CLASSES
-
1,194
-
-
00/
55 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
2,000
4,001
442
1,558
220r
56 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
550
-
-
550
00/
57 INTERLOCAL GRANTS
-
-
27,216
(27,216)
00/
58 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS
-
-
66,000
(66,000)
00/
1,172,760
877,159
1,622,533
(449,773)
1380,
42021 Real Personal/Property Taxis$97,911 higher than 2020, and EMS Property Taxis$61,960 higher for total of $159,870.
5 2021 Local Retail SaleslUse Tax revenues are $1,774,135 higher than 2020 revenues Please also see pages pages 3 & 4.
21
Packet Pg.
314
8.10.a
Page 2 of 3
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 10/31/2020 10/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
13 PHOTOCOPIES
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES
17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE)
18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
24 LEGAL SERVICES
25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
26 BOOKING FEES
27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
33 PLAN CHECKING FEES
34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE
36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES
39 PROGRAM FEES 6
40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
41 WINTERMARKET REGISTRATION FEES
42 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES
43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
$ 3,000
$ 4,336
$ 4,418
$ (1,418)
1470/
600
120
216
384
360/
11,000
5,518
4,123
6,877
370/
150
7
2
148
10/
300
65
-
300
00/
-
235
168
(168)
00/
4,000
2,358
98
3,902
20/
1,000
589
465
535
470/
50
66
176
(126)
3530/
100
9
-
100
00/ 0
25,100
-
-
25,100
CL
00/ d
600
-
-
600
00/
1,000
450
180
820
180/
500
-
-
500
00/
200,000
223,782
193,020
6,980
970/
1,400
-
-
1,400
00/ E
85,000
71,159
70,262
14,738
830/ -
10,000
5,795
-
10,000
00/
30,000
-
18,118
11,882
600/
76,800
36,753
2,505
74,295
30/ o
195,000
198,859
204,825
(9,825)
10501
-
58
52
(52)
00/ N
57,000
59,291
57,132
(132)
1000/ N
1,050
1,183
359
691
340/ L
38,000
31,603
24,347
13,653
640/
3,000
1,997
685
2,315
230/ O
10,000
18,602
26,140
(16,140)
2610/ 0
3,500
3,147
1,931
1,569
550/ O
1,007,500
784,324
662,287
345,213
660/
2,500
1,880
3,351
(851)
1340/ o
50
-
-
50
00/ 0
65,600
68,214
84,563
(18,963)
1290/ lY
350,900
236,734
399,920
(49,020)
1140/
4,000
15,225
12,739
(8,739)
3180/ 'C1
500
-
158
342
320/
3,000
2,960
3,700
(700)
1230/ =_
14,000
14,382
14,740
(740)
1050/ LL
15,500
3,083
91
15,409
10/ s
900,662
91,025
413,314
487,348
460/
1,300
-
-
1,300
00/ 0
5,000
7,998
12,635
(7,635)
253°/
-
-
2,660
(2,660)
00 j
800
-
680
120
850/ N
2,892,106
2,487,084
2,745,897
146,209
950/ i
6,021,568
4,378,891
4,965,957
1,055,611
82F/ AD
6 2021 Parks & Recreation Program Revenues are $322,288 higher than 2020 revenues.
22
Packet Pg. 315 1
8.10.a
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2021 Amended 10/31/2020 10/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
15 CRIM CONV FEE CT
16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
20 CRIM CONV FEE CN
21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT
23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
MISCELLANEOUS:
26 INVESTMENT INTEREST
27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
29 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS
30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
31 LEASES LONG TERM
32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
33 PARKSDONATIONS
34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
40 POLICE JUDGMENT S✓RESTITUTION
41 CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORTAGES
42 OTHER MISC REVENUES
43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
45 NSF FEES - POLICE
46 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
47 NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT
48 L&I STAY AT WORK PROGRAM
49 US BANK REBAT E
TRANSFERS -IN:
50 OPERATING TRANSFER -IN
51 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM FUND 018
52 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM 511
53 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$ 2,000 $
1,002 $
2,189 $
(189)
1090/
230,000
89,134
140,662
89,338
610/
18,000
10,608
7,883
10,117
440/
10,000
7,948
10,374
(374)
1040/
1,000
760
7,903
(6,903)
7900/
1,500
1,088
1,548
(48)
1030/
100,000
59,603
42,512
57,488
430/
2,000
794
419
1,581
210/
7,000
6,958
6,131
869
880/
300
190
73
227
240/
100
35
65
35
650/
1,500
1,901
1,359
141
91 °/
25,000
17,782
11,971
13,029
480/
2,000
1,849
1,531
469
770/
700
455
93
607
130/
100
37
12
88
120/
10,000
6,293
2,026
7,974
200/
800
955
330
470
410/
1,000
615
241
759
240/
200
82
79
121
400/
8,000
6,202
4,203
3,797
530/
14,000
6,946
6,310
7,690
450/
3,000
2,921
1,240
1,760
410/
10,100
-
-
10,100
00/
150
1,441
(24)
174
-160/
448,450
225,599
249,131
199,319
569
155,090
264,232
252,155
(97,065)
1630/
9,980
12,300
5,976
4,004
600/
3,400
5,746
6,590
(3,190)
1940/
153,000
24,524
83,591
69,409
550/
2,100
380
-
2,100
00/
205,000
138,784
159,113
45,887
780/
2,500
910
29
2,471
10/
3,500
920
750
2,750
210/
2,000
635
2,010
(10)
1010/
5,000
100
3,503
1,497
700/
300
538
118
182
390/
3,000
3,586
6,569
(3,569)
2190/
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/
2,000
1,344
3,444
(1,444)
1720/
200
248
753
(553)
3760/
-
16
24
(24)
00/
5,000
13,467
5,475
(475)
1100/
100
34
74
26
740/
100
30
60
40
600/
-
-
30
(30)
00/
150
142
-
150
00/
-
30
-
-
00/
-
-
7,893
(7,893)
00/
8,500
7,251
9,153
(653)
1080/
562,920
475,217
547,309
15,611
970i
278,667
-
28,445
250,222
100/
123,581
-
123,581
-
1000/
-
1,500,000
-
1
00/
26,300
35,800
13,150
13,150
5001
428,548
1,535,800
165,176
263,373
39o,
$ 42,490,777
$ 30,980,306
$ 33,150,199
$ 9,340,579
780,
23
Packet Pg. 316
1 8.10.a I
Page 1 of 6
C ITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 17,619,699
$ 13,781,011
$ 13,975,288
$ 3,644,411
799
2 OVERTIME
491,580
489,261
560,932
(69,352)
1149
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
281,329
5,394
7,458
273,871
Y
4 BENEFITS
6,801,704
5,288,570
5,171,507
1,630,197
76°
5 UNIFORMS
89,151
73,733
61,420
27,731
699
6 SUPPLIES
401,115
359,617
376,577
24,538
949
7 FUEL CONSUMED
-
-
215
(215)
0°
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
108,603
135,627
194,015
(85,412)
179°
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,037,824
11,007,014
10,484,133
4,553,691
709
10 COMMUNICATIONS
160,995
127,047
153,750
7,245
95°
11 TRAVEL
68,760
9,633
26,985
41,775
399
12 EXCISE TAXES
6,500
12,850
21,504
(15,004)
33V
13 RENTAL/LEASE
1,574,465
1,502,919
1,270,455
304,010
8V
14 INSURANCE
403,973
393,746
405,121
(1,148)
1009
15 UTILITIES
536,762
402,108
449,525
87,237
84°
16 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
917,742
577,041
703,766
213,976
77
17 MISCELLANEOUS
507,715
289,998
351,308
156,407
69°
18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
50,000
75,000
50,000
-
1009
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
957,880
834,033
234,945
722,935
259
20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
9,053
-
23,120
0°
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
54,530
-
54,530
0°
22 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
212
-
500
09
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
5,700
69,285
60,087
(54,387)
1054°
46,099,647
35,443,150
34,558,991
11,540,656
759
LEO FF-MEDIC AL INS. RESERVE(009)
24 BENEFITS
$ 206,650 $
132,391 $
121,888 $
84,762
59°
25 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
88,539
88,125
164,865
35°
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
5,793
17,000
(10,000)
24Y
27 MISCELLANEOUS
500
-
-
500
09
467,140
226,722
227,013
240,127
499
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFTFUND (014)
28 SUPPLIES
$ 100 $
- $
- $
100
0°
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
-
200
0°
30 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
-
5,600
0°
5,900
-
5,900
09
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016)
31 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
$ 210,222 $
- $
$
210,222
0�
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND (017)
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
20,000
$
-
$
16,149
$
3,851
8V
20,000
-
16,149
3,851
8V
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
33 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $
123,581
$
-
$
123,581
$
-
100°
123,581
-
123,581
100°
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND (019)
34 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
-
$
21,555
$
-
$
0°
35 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
28,445
-
28,445
1009
28,445
21,555
28,445
-
100°
DRUG ENFO RCEMINT FUND (104)
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $
45,000
$
$
-
$
45,000
0°
37 REPAIR/MAINT
800
-
800
0°
38 MISCELLANEOUS
-
30,332
-
0°
45,800
30,332
45,800
0°
u
24
Packet Pg. 317
1 8.10.a I
Page 2 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DEr'AIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
% Spent
S TREET FUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 728,690
$ 542,076
$ 597,387
$ 131,303
829
2 OVERTIME
18,400
37,182
35,504
(17,104)
193°
3 BENEFITS
381,336
268,438
290,284
91,052
769
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,781
5,432
568
9V
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
142,903
126,921
136,079
4K
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
684
3,565
16,435
189
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23,210
2,423
8,991
14,220
399
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
6,623
5,271
(771)
117°
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0°
10 RENTAL/LEASE
247,270
192,873
206,903
40,367
849
11 INSURANCE
148,436
156,937
148,533
(97)
100°
12 UTILITIES
280,918
214,497
204,135
76,783
7Y
13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
52,000
52,348
48,497
3,503
939
14 MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
3,655
11,807
(3,807)
14K
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
75,658
-
-
09
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,220
-
-
4,220
0°
17INTEREST
450
255
220
230
49°
COMBINED STREErCONST/EMPROVE(112)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
19 BENEFIT S
20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
21 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
22 MISCELLANEOUS
23 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
24 LAND
25 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
26 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
27 INTEREST
MUNIC IPAL ARTS AC Q UIS. FUND (117)
28 SUPPLIES
29 SMALL EQUIPMENT
30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
31 TRAVEL
32 RENTAL/LEASE
33 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
34 MISCELLANEOUS
MEMO RIAL S TREET TREE (118)
35 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
37 MISCELLANEOUS
38 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
EMPLO YEE PARIONG PERMIT FUND (121)
39 SUPPLIES
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
41 MISCELLANEOUS
TO URIS M PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123 )
42 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 2,187,430 $ 1,700,334 $ 1,693,449 $ 493,981 779
$ - $
10,567
$ $
0°
-
6,613
-
09
1,581,847
162,084
861,656
720,191
549
103,670
320,161
67,863
35,807
65°
-
8
-
-
09
114,950
40,121
39,925
75,025
359
33,000
-
(842)
33,842
-Y
955,000
305,428
599,912
355,088
639
72,220
72,201
72,201
19
100°
1,610
1,952
1,591
19
99°
$ 2,862,297 $
919,137
$ 1,642,307 $
1,219,990
579
$ 4,700 $
114 $
300 $
4,400
6�
1,700
116
-
1,700
0°
221,500
26,540
52,862
168,638
24°
80
-
-
80
0°
2,000
-
2,000
09
300
-
-
300
0°
6,600
1,466
3,274
3,326
50°
$ 236,880 $
28,236 $
56,435 $
180,445
249
$ 20,528 $ $ 20,487 $ 41 100`
$ 20,528 $ - $ 20,487 $ 41 1001,
$ 83,150 $ 42,737 $ 41,886 $ 41,264 509
- 592 - - 09
4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 50°
$ 87,150 $ 47,329 $ 43,886 $ 43,264 509
$ 1,790 $ 632 $ 1,266 $ 524 7V
25,090 - - 25,090 0�
$ 26,880 $ 632 $ 1,266 $ 25,614 5�
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ 75 $ 2,925 31,
$ 3,000 $ 450 $ 75 $ 2,925 3Z,
$ 29,900 $ 5,129 $ 2,500 $ 27,400 K
$ 29,900 $ 5,129 $ 2,500 $ 27,400 K
25
Packet Pg. 318
1 8.10.a I
Page 3 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 121,000
$ 14,374
$ 61,712
$ 59,288
5V
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
195,626
302,921
199,305
(3,679)
102°
3 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
105,000
354,028
263,865
(158,865)
25V
4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
190
-
-
190
09
5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,179,482
645,880
59,227
1,120,255
5°
$ 1,601,298
$ 1,317,203
$ 584,109
$ 1,017,189
36°
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 (126)
6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
9 LAND
10 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
11 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
12 INTEREST
13 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
14 SUPPLIES
15 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
16 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
17 MISCELLANEOUS
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
CEMETERY MAINTENANCElIMPROVEMEVT(130)
19 SALARIES AND WAGES
20 OVERTIME
21 BENEFIT S
22 UNIFORMS
23 SUPPLIES
24 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
25 SMALL EQUIPMENT
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
27 COMMUNICATIONS
28 TRAVEL
29 RENTAL/LEASE
30 UTILITIES
31 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
32 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUST FUND (136)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
34 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
36 SUPPLIES
37 TRAVEL
38 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPRO VEMENT DISTRIC T FUND (140)
39 SUPPLIES
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
41 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142)
42 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
43 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
44 INTEREST
$
573,234
$
604,778
$
318,410
$
254,824
56°
97,050
257,722
194,829
(97,779)
2011,
138,910
12,963
11,863
127,048
99 0
-
-
46,952
(46,952)
0° 0.
983,137
463,550
327,979
655,158
33° p�
144,530
-
-
144,530
0°
117,050
1,484
1,282
115,768
I°
-
575
-
-
0°
$
2,053,911
$
1,341,070
$
901,314
$
1,152,597
44Z C
IL
$
67,500
$
39,033
$
21,799
$
45,701
32° �+
6,500
3,000
-
6,500
w
7,183
-
0° C
600
168
-
600
0°
26,300
35,800
13,150
13,150
509 r
$
100,900
$
85,183
$
34,949
$
65,951
35° C
N
$
95,824
$
78,592
$
83,538
$
12,286
879 N
3,500
558
302
3,198
9° C
40,472
33,646
32,850
7,622
8 v v
1,000
-
490
510
499 0
7,000
2,717
1,611
5,389
20,000
15,165
24,059
(4,059)
120°
-
1,184
-
-
09 0
0.
4,200
150
800
3,400
19, lY
1,700
1,401
1,403
297
83°
500
-
-
500
w .�
16,650
6,858
13,875
2,775
8Y
5,652
3,559
4,045
1,607
72°
500
-
-
500
09
4,000
5,124
2,717
1,283
68° L
$
200,998
$
148,952
$
165,690
$
35,308
82° s
r
C
$
50,000
$
-
$
-
$
50,000
w 0
$
50,000
$
-
$
$
50,000
0E
r
N
$
25,000
$
-
$
$
25,000
0� cm
-
-
19,211
(19,211)
w d
$
25,000
$
-
$
19,211
$
5,789
77°
$
1,500
$
11
$
$
1,500
w O
4,500
-
4,500
09 y ;
5,900
-
5,900
0° _
$
11,900
$
11
$
$
11,900
0°
t
$
2,050
$
9,555
$
397
$
1,653
199
70,035
37,835
40,049
29,986
57° Q
4,255
2,423
1,641
2,614
39°
$
76,340
49,813
42,087
$
34,253
55°
$ 5,946,550 $ 964,793 $ 628,177 $ 5,318,373 1 V
5,946,550 $ 964,793 628,177 $ 5,318,373 1 V
$ 677,990 $ - $ - $ 677,990 0°
81,710 47,291 40,853 40,857 50°
$ 759,700 $ 47,291 $ 40,853 $ 718,847 5°
26
Packet Pg. 319
1 8.10.a I
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 113,453
$ 363,171
$ 977,510
$ (864,057)
8629
2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
44,000
20,316
-
44,000
0°
3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,395,037
753,392
167,965
5,227,072
Y
$ 5,552,490
$ 1,136,879
$ 1,145,475
$ 4,407,015
21°
WATER FUND (421)
4 SALARIES AND WAGES
5 OVERTIME
6 BENEFIT S
7 UNIFORMS
8 SUPPLIES
9 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
10 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
11 SMALL EQUIPMENT
12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13 COMMUNICATIONS
14 TRAVEL
15 EXCISE TAXES
16 RENTAL/LEASE
17 INSURANCE
18 UTILITIES
19 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
20 MISCELLANEOUS
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
24 REVENUE BONDS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
27 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
STORM FUND (422)
28 SALARIES AND WAGES
29 OVERTIME
30 BENEFIT S
31 UNIFORMS
32 SUPPLIES
33 SMALL EQUIPMENT
34 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
35 COMMUNICATIONS
36 TRAVEL
37 EXCISE TAXES
38 RENTAL/LEASE
39 INSURANCE
40 UTILITES
41 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
42 MISCELLANEOUS
43 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
44 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
45 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
46 REVENUE BONDS
47 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
48 INTEREST
49 OTHER INT ERESF & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
$ 793,475 $ 688,932 $ 543,376 $ 250,099 6K
24,000 15,595 17,629 6,371 7Y
328,865 263,013 233,498 95,367 7V
4,000
3,374
3,437
563
869 ..
150,000
102,299
101,474
48,526
6K G
2,170,000
1,651,885
1,550,689
619,311
71° Q.
170,000
131,727
161,736
8,264
959
11,000
5,197
4,437
6,563
40°
1,558,701
1,085,927
1,068,508
490,193
69° V
30,000
24,001
24,165
5,835
8V C
200
-
-
200
0°
1,649,700
1,297,916
1,210,843
438,857
7Y jZ
124,630
108,420
104,674
19,956
849 >,
97,844
52,541
98,196
(352)
low
35,775
22,727
23,347
12,428
65° C
258,130
19,881
158,267
99,863
61' 0
123,600
111,326
144,739
(21,139)
117' r
644,130
204,067
198,136
445,994
3V C
1,976,050
2,934,520
1,321,534
654,516
67° N
2,840
-
-
2,840
0° L
385,100
-
-
385,100
09
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
low
196,170
105,907
98,336
97,834
509
0
-
378
-
-
0°
$ 10,760,050 $
8,855,472 $
7,092,861 $
3,667,189
669 r
$ 723,700 $
524,991 $
560,388 $
163,312
77
6,000
12,016
22,040
(16,040)
367
318,735
241,396
239,977
78,758
75°
6,500
6,437
5,049
1,451
7K
46,000
19,055
28,503
17,497
62°
4,000
2,026
304
3,696
K
2,728,016
1,567,146
1,296,882
1,431,134
4K
3,200
5,159
4,720
(1,520)
147
4,300
-
510
3,790
12°
470,100
485,391
529,154
(59,054)
11Y
267,778
225,328
219,645
48,133
829
66,216
116,576
66,228
(12)
100°
11,025
9,468
10,536
489
96°
64,130
15,103
80,978
(16,848)
126°
255,300
148,250
206,854
48,446
8 V
281,810
78,897
76,327
205,483
279
1,581,000
3,088,873
129,168
1,451,832
K
103,340
-
-
103,340
09
188,240
-
-
188,240
0°
53,590
53,576
53,576
14
1009
110,910
60,769
58,672
52,238
53°
-
165
-
-
0°
$ 7,293,890 $
6,660,621 $
3,589,509 $
3,704,381
499
27
Packet Pg. 320
1 8.10.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDPTURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 2,027,508
$ 1,564,447
$ 1,459,402
$ 568,106
72°
2 OVERTIME
95,000
85,125
110,436
(15,436)
1169
3 BENEFITS
871,564
674,421
632,926
238,638
7Y
4 UNIFORMS
8,500
7,482
8,516
(16)
10W
5 SUPPLIES
404,000
289,072
300,813
103,187
749
6 FUEL CONSUMED
30,000
16,184
55,215
(25,215)
184°
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
W
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
36,680
181,454
(146,454)
518°
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,141,848
3,023,707
3,862,193
(1,720,345)
18W
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
34,517
35,322
7,678
82°
11 TRAVEL
5,000
-
3,825
1,175
76°
12 EXCISE TAXES
968,000
799,573
926,107
41,893
969
13 RENTAL/LEASE
329,898
269,140
356,858
(26,960)
10K
14 INSURANCE
160,967
175,867
162,851
(1,884)
1019
15 UTILITIES
1,979,985
730,964
1,174,315
805,670
59°
16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
520,630
172,176
432,059
88,571
8Y
17 MISCELLANEOUS
129,350
72,899
100,217
29,133
779
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10,180,936
83,575
3,804,155
6,376,781
379
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
2,584,681
-
-
W
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
19,756,808
4,687,579
7,939,825
11,816,983
4W
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
157,060
-
-
157,060
0°
22 REVENUE BONDS
86,670
-
-
86,670
W
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
173,900
173,200
173,888
12
10W
24 INTEREST
382,660
36,505
202,153
180,507
53°
25 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
-
-
1,518
(1,518)
W
26 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
5,085
4,430
(4,430)
W
$ 40,492,284 $ 15,522,880 $ 21,928,479 $ 18,563,805 549
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
27 REVENUE BONDS $ 785,020 $ - $ - $ 785,020 W
28 INTEREST 1,200,850 616,542 600,417 600,433 5W
$ 1,985,870 $ 616,542 $ 600,417 $ 1,385,453 3W
O
Q.
d
0
C
eo
C
IL
t
C
O
2
T
N
O
N
L
d
O
0
O
r-
O
Q.
d
<0
U
C
O
C
IL
z
r
C
O
a
28
Packet Pg. 321
1 8.10.a I
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQ UIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 272,384
$ 224,189
$ 228,154
$ 44,230
84°
2 OVERTIME
2,000
824
2,267
(267)
11Y
3 BENEFITS
116,481
93,275
93,442
23,039
80°
4 UNIFORMS
1,000
1,092
1,182
(182)
11K
5 SUPPLIES
120,000
61,489
60,087
59,913
50°
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
0°
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
258,000
101,561
131,486
126,514
519
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
1,515
6,022
51,978
109
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
4,248
1,121
45,629
2°
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
1,902
1,833
1,167
61°
11 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0�
12 RENTAL/LEASE
12,790
10,273
10,221
2,569
809
13 INSURANCE
40,910
40,270
39,334
1,576
969
14 UTILITIES
14,500
12,012
12,495
2,005
869
15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
60,000
35,162
39,991
20,009
67
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
8,776
10,384
1,616
87
17 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
-
1,500,000
-
-
0°
18 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
410,139
614,032
416,505
(6,366)
102°
$ 1,429,954
$ 2,710,622
$ 1,054,526
$ 375,428
74°
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
19 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
379,162
$
240,316
$
289,578
$
89,584
769
20 OVERTIME
2,000
-
2,481
(481)
124°
21 BENEFITS
127,657
80,751
88,422
39,235
699
22 SUPPLIES
5,000
8,726
4,227
773
859
23 SMALL EQUIPMENT
141,300
101,247
34,872
106,428
259
24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
171,460
69,477
32,719
138,741
19°
25 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
52,766
57,403
1,367
989
26 TRAVEL
1,500
-
-
1,500
0°
27 RENTAL/LEASE
7,400
6,523
6,448
952
87
28 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
302,660
287,807
424,699
(122,039)
140°
29 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
11,501
4,000
1,000
80°
30 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
56,000
-
-
56,000
0°
$
1,257,909
$
859,114
$
944,850
$
313,059
759
FIRIUMEV'S PENSION FUND (617)
31 BENEFITS
$
24,560
$
18,045
$
18,528
$
6,032
75°
32 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
70,407
51,486
53,886
16,521
7T
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,200
1,007
11,500
(10,300)
9589
34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
40,000
-
-
40,000
0°
$
136,167
$
70,538
$
83,914
$
52,253
62°
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
132,190,011
$
78,809,991
$
77,271,007
$
54,919,004
5K
29
Packet Pg. 322
8.10.a
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2021 Amended 10/31/2020 10/31/2021 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PARKS & RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
$ 432,478 $
266,797 $
273,284 $
159,194
63%
345,501
276,971
276,714
68,787
80%
837,176
535,390
554,503
282,673
66%
1,166,183
872,107
955,506
210,677
82%
757,055
611,199
475,376
281,679
63%
G
Q.
1,178,545
1,133,433
1,115,329
63,216
95%
936,480
718,169
702,190
234,290
75%
12,906,593
10,148,912
9,614,308
3,292,285
74%
12,217,071
9,682,005
9,394,444
2,822,627
77%
IL
624,198
457,484
473,861
150,337
76%
3,621,500
2,302,031
2,430,629
1,190,871
67%
r�
C
599,402
-
66,376
533,026
11%
2
N
4,729,281
3,011,118
3,577,972
1,151,309
76%
N
3,305,285
2,628,170
2,617,311
687,974
79%
L
�
2,442,899
2,799,364
2,031,188
411,711
83%
v
$ 46,099,647 $
35,443,150 $
34,558,991 $
11,540,656
75%
O
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
10/31/2020
Expenditures
10/31/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
WATER UTILITYFUND
$ 10,760,050
$ 8,855,472
$ 7,092,861
$ 3,667,189
66%
STORM UTILITY FUND
7,293,890
6,660,621
3,589,509
3,704,381
49%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
40,492,284
15,522,880
21,928,479
18,563,805
54%
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,985,870
616,542
600,417
1,385,453
30%
$ 60,532,094
$ 31,655,514
$ 33,211,267
$ 27,320,827
55%
30
Packet Pg. 323
1 8.10.a I
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2021 Amended
Budget
10/31/2020
Expenditures
10/31/2021
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
200,052
$
158,990
$
166,568
$
33,484
83%
BENEFITS
118,713
82,327
86,404
32,309
73%
SUPPLIES
2,000
2,078
1,808
192
90%
SERVICES
111,713
23,402
18,504
93,209
17%
$
432,478
$
266,797
$
273,284
$
159,194
63%
O FFIC E O F MAYO R
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
229,512
$
186,356
$
191,549
$
37,963
83%
BENEFITS
85,243
70,261
68,365
16,878
80%
SUPPLIES
1,500
4,998
358
1,142
24%
SERVICES
29,246
15,356
16,441
12,805
56%
$
345,501
$
276,971
$
276,714
$
68,787
80%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
387,048
$
299,538
$
299,623
$
87,425
77%
BENEFITS
154,430
119,289
112,209
42,221
73%
SUPPLIES
13,600
4,817
1,271
12,329
9%
SERVICES
282,098
111,746
141,400
140,698
50%
$
837,176
$
535,390
$
554,503
$
282,673
66%
MUNICIPAL C O URT
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
651,967
$
531,782
$
570,551
$
81,416
88%
BENEFITS
243,859
195,930
185,719
58,140
76%
SUPPLIES
11,600
12,808
5,774
5,826
50%
SERVICES
235,637
131,587
193,462
42,175
82%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
23,120
0%
$
1,166,183
$
872,107
$
955,506
$
210,677
82%
C ITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
397,226
$
335,263
$
218,427
$
178,799
55%
BENEFITS
169,669
136,352
88,098
81,571
52%
SUPPLIES
7,000
5,395
3,115
3,885
45%
SERVICES
183,160
134,189
165,736
17,424
90%
$
757,055
$
611,199
$
475,376
$
281,679
63%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
795,289
$
808,910
$
763,215
$
32,074
96%
BENEFITS
253,850
221,472
241,405
12,445
95%
SUPPLIES
10,000
3,871
4,608
5,392
46%
SERVICES
119,406
99,180
106,102
13,304
89%
$
1,178,545
$
1,133,433
$
1,115,329
$
63,216
95%
CITY ATPO RNEY
SERVICES
$
936,480
$
718,169
$
702,190
$
234,290
75%
$
936,480
$
718,169
$
702,190
$
234,290
75%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS
50,000
1,254
26,878
23,122
54%
SUPPLIES
5,000
3,867
4,447
553
89%
SERVICES
11,681,233
9,165,261
9,237,951
2,443,282
79%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,007,880
909,033
284,945
722,935
28%
DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL
54,530
-
-
54,530
0%
DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST
6,200
69,497
60,087
(53,887)
969%
$
12,906,593
$
10,148,912
$
9,614,308
$
3,292,285
74%
PO LIC E SERVIC ES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
8,149,422
$
6,247,989
$
6,251,307
$
1,898,115
77%
BENEFITS
2,979,421
2,355,740
2,204,846
774,575
74%
SUPPLIES
169,453
170,225
195,063
(25,610)
115%
SERVICES
918,775
908,052
743,228
175,547
81%
$
12,217,071
$
9,682,005
$
9,394,444
$
2,822,627
77%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
312,977
$
269,916
$
249,449
$
63,528
80%
BENEFITS
91,455
77,390
75,001
16,454
82%
SUPPLIES
3,075
10,160
999
2,076
32%
SERVICES
216,691
100,018
148,413
68,278
68%
$
624,198
$
457,484
$
473,861
$
150,337
76%
Q
31
Packet Pg. 324 1
1 8.10.a I
Page 2 of 2
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2021 Amended
10/31/2020
10/31/2021
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 1,875,514
$ 1,436,897
$ 1,505,736
$ 369,778
80%
BENEFITS
693,217
517,568
522,585
170,632
75%
SUPPLIES
19,400
8,533
10,471
8,929
54%
SERVICES
1,033,369
339,033
391,837
641,532
38%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
0%
$ 3,621,500
$ 2,302,031
$ 2,430,629
$ 1,190,871
67%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
79,510
$
$
35,803
$
43,707
45%
BENEFITS
18,392
-
7,800
10,592
42%
SUPPLIES
1,500
13,751
(12,251)
917%
SERVICES
500,000
-
9,023
490,977
2%
599,402
66,376
533,026
11%
PARKS & REC RE.ATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
2,329,689
$
1,639,879
$
1,917,731
$
411,958
82%
BENEFITS
828,746
617,689
674,961
153,785
81%
SUPPLIES
138,790
132,442
155,388
(16,598)
112%
SERVICES
1,432,056
612,055
829,892
602,164
58%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
9,053
-
-
0%
$
4,729,281
$
3,011,118
$
3,577,972
$
1,151,309
76%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINIS TRATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
300,162
$
247,992
$
251,431
$
48,731
84%
BENEFITS
106,903
86,876
86,014
20,889
80%
SUPPLIES
9,600
3,631
8,061
1,539
84%
SERVICES
95,588
84,745
74,064
21,524
77%
$
512,253
$
423,243
$
419,569
$
92,684
82%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES
791,470
660,591
665,744
125,726
84%
BENEFITS
360,720
295,039
280,904
79,816
78%
SUPPLIES
115,000
131,550
163,756
(48,756)
142%
SERVICES
1,175,709
1,712,183
920,784
254,925
78%
$
2,442,899
$
2,799,364
$
2,031,188
$
411,711
83%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,791,020
$
1,451,562
$
1,456,545
$
334,475
81%
BENEFITS
736,237
585,116
571,738
164,499
78%
SUPPLIES
2,200
868
1,937
263
88%
SERVICES
263,575
167,381
167,521
96,054
64%
$
2,793,032
$
2,204,927
$
2,197,742
$
595,290
79%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$
46,099,647
$
35,443,150
$
34,558,991
$
11,540,656
75%
u
32
Packet Pg. 325
8.10.a
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
& SUBFUNDS
10/31 /2021 10/31 /2021
Q3 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
001-General Fund
$ 12,459,954 $ 6,250,213
$ (2,802,094) $ (1,408,792
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
310,163 310,163
(59,447.79) (227,013 m
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
1,782,149 1,782,150
0.21 -
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
19,688 19,689
0.14 2,500
016-Building Maintenance
210,221 210,221
- -
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
848,617 848,616
(0.01) (15,999
Total General Fund & Subfunds
$ 15,630,792 $ 9,421,052
$ (2,861,541) $ (1,649,305
*$2,000,000 of the General Fund Balance has been assigned by management for the development of Civic Field. o
2
*$7,267,031of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,768,863 balance in Fund 012, represent the required 20% N
operating reserve. N
L
There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. o
r
U
o
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
t
0
0
2
U
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
ii
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ---- 2'
FUNDS
10/31 /2021 10/31 /2021
t
Q3 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
— 0
r
N
General Fund &Subfunds
$ 15,630,792 $ 9,421,052
$ (2,861,541) $ (1,649,305 N
Special Revenue
19,599,301 18,292,894
1,116,276 8,609,099
Capital Projects
5,449,970 5,258,245
(39,733) (703,540
0
Total Governmental Funds
$ 40,680,062 $ 32,972,191
$ (1,784,999) $ 6,256,254
c
a�
E
t
c�
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
33
Packet Pg. 326
8.10.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
GOVERNMENTAL
SPECIAL REVENUE
10/31/2021
10/31/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 76,269
$ 75,881
$ 472 $
1,966
111 - Street Fund
880,732
733,344
(68,293)
(257,679
112- Combined Street Const/Improve
2,439,434
1,946,814
289,417
357,771 0
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
672,955
668,350
(9,230)
(9,772
118 - Memorial Street Tree
137
-
128
(20,081
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
88,846
81,294
12,129
21,925 Z
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
93,316
92,593
739
11,317 c
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund
14,307
14,215
202
480 'U-
123-Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
101,431
98,591
9,880
21,094 ,
125 - Real Estate Tax
4,182,133
3,867,992
436,295
1,610,151
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1
3,591,568
3,274,321
471,515
1,281,400 0
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
320,300
318,291
9,501
22,236
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
255,704
254,277
40,087
50,576 0
136 - Parks Trust Fund
171,043
169,919
1,057
4,405 ci
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,120,463
1,113,115
(4,382)
30,602 0
138 - Sister City Commission
13,156
13,086
81
2,793 U
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
50,607
50,608
(10,665)
31,456 0
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd
143,048
136,352
23,198
64,607 r
142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
5,363,261
5,363,261
(85,857)
5,363,261 Q.
143 - Tree Fund
20,590
20,590
-
20,590
Total Special Revenue
$ 19,599,301
$ 18,292,894
$ 1,116,276 $
8,609,099
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for
the purchase of Open Space.
c
ii
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
''
0
2
r
N
O
N
L
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
---- 0
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
10/31/2021
10/31/2021
Q3
YTD O
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
421 -Water Utility Fund
$ 27,550,457
$ 6,551,897
$ 417,816 $
a�
1,850,806 t
422 -Storm Utility Fund *
15,826,094
6,343,814
733,175
v
2,235,406
423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund
50,288,948
17,112,080
564,437
(2,109,480 Q
424 - Bond Reserve Fund
843,970
843,970
3
9
411 -Combined Utility Operation
6,240
37,624
560
6,240
Total Enterprise Funds
$ 94,515,710
$ 30,889,385
$ 1,715,991 $
1,982,980
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
34
Packet Pg. 327
8.10.a
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
CITY-WIDE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
10/31/2021 10/31/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
Governmental Funds
$ 40,680,062 $ 32,972,191
$
(1,784,999) $
6,256,254
Enterprise Funds
94,515,710 30,889,385
1,715,991
1,982,980 a
Internal Services Fund
10,216,679 5,685,107
146,413
m
262,260
Agency Funds
51,202 51,201
(31,951)
(83,914
Total City-wide Total
$ 145,463,652 $ 69,597,885
$
45,455 $
8,417,580
ii
21
c
0
2
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
N
0
N
L
0
r
V
Oy
FUND BALANCES
L
CHANGE IN FUND Q.
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
—
0
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
10/31/2021 10/31/2021
Q3
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
c
ii
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
$ 9,291,623 $ 4,865,386
$
33,545 $
187,827 t
512 -Technology Rental Fund
925,056 819,721
112,868
c
74,433 0
Total Internal Service Funds
$ 10,216,679 $ 5,685,107
$
146,413 $
262,260 N
0
N
L
d
0
E
ci
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
35
Packet Pg. 328
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Selection of Council President and Council President Pro Tem for 2022
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Each year the City Council selects a Council President and a Council President Pro Tem to serve for the
legislative year ahead.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The procedure for selection of the Council President will be as follows:
The clerk will call for nominations. No Councilmember may nominate more than one person until every
member wishing to nominate a candidate has had an opportunity to do so. Nominations do not require
a second. The clerk will repeat each nomination until all nominations have been made. When it appears
no one else wishes to make a nomination, the clerk will ask again for nominations. If none are made, the
clerk will declare the nominations closed. After the nominations are closed, the clerk will call for a vote
in the order that the nominations were made. Councilmembers will be asked to signify their vote by
raising their hand. As soon as a nominee receives four votes, the clerk will declare the Council President
elected and no votes will be taken on the remaining nominees. The same process will be repeated for
the election of the Council President Pro Tem.
Packet Pg. 329
9.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Virtual Only/Hybrid Meetings Discussion
Staff Lead: Council President Paine and Administrative Services Director Turley
Department: City Council
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
As COVID continues its' assault on communities everywhere, Edmonds faces the challenge of conducting
effective Council meetings where all meeting participants have an equivalent meeting experience that is
independent of their location, either in -person or virtual. Council asked staff and fellow councilmembers
to explore updates to the current system to produce a better hybrid meeting format for Council and the
public.
Recommendation
For discussion only.
Narrative
After extensive research of other meeting systems, IT has concluded the following: "As we discovered
with all the City interviews/demos, there really isn't an (hybrid) option to throw a large amount of
money to solve it with hardware (and software) only." As a part of this discussion, Council will need to
determine if the cost associated with managing a hybrid meeting is worthwhile.
If council decides to go with the hybrid option, Council will need to bring in their own IT personnel to
support the technological needs of the Council and support the hybrid model for Council meetings. A
contracted technology position would cost approximately $60,000 through the RFQ process.
If the Council decided to remain with the virtual only model, there would not be a need for any changes
or the need for additional support.
The Council is asked to review the attached documents outlining the current system and other possible
options. In addition, the Snohomish Health District published updated COVID information on 12/28/21;
those results are included here.
When we began having virtual meetings, we did not have a way to allow audience comments. Due to
that fact, the publiccomment(s) email was created. It was decided by the group to have council
reconsider having this email.
Attachments:
V2 Final - Hybrid Meeting report to Council
Packet Pg. 330
9.2.a
Virtual Only vs. Hybrid Council Meetings
On November 23 Council asked to have a report for discussion regarding Hybrid meetings.
Group members - Susan Paine, Laura Johnson, Maureen Judge, Dave Rohde, Dave Turley, Scott
Passey, and Nick Falk
Definition of Hybrid meeting —Where all meeting participants have an equivalent meeting
experience that is independent of their location, either in -person or virtual. We define
participants as: elected officials, presenters, public commenters, and public viewers.
Overview
We reviewed the process and procedures for our hybrid meeting and interviewed both Port
Townsend and Mill Creek to learn about how they are conducting hybrid meetings. *** The
short version is that when we did have those few hybrid meetings, those were moderately
successful but very labor intensive.
The following pages include discussion topics regarding Virtual only vs. Hybrid, along with
community participation data, and the most current COVID data. As we discovered with all the
City interviews/demos, there isn't any option to throw a large amount of money to solve it with
software and hardware only.
Council will need to determine the level of service (i.e. quality) we want to maintain for our
meetings and those associated costs. If there is a technology -related crash, the meeting may
need to be adjourned to the next day if the problem can't be remedied within a short period of
time, if we go with the hybrid format. As a part of this discussion, Council will need to
determine if the cost associated with managing a hybrid meeting is worthwhile.
Other recommendations —
Reconsider the current system of public comments:
1. Discontinue having the public comments email. Our virtual public comments are
abundant and often repetitive of the emails. The practice of including these emails
in our Council packets as that is repetitive as well as using a lot of paper for those
CMs who get the printed packets.
2. Alternatively, include the public comment in the weekly packets, but don't print
them.
3. Allow one public comment —either written or verbal —but not both.
Packet Pg. 331
9.2.a
Virtual Only Considerations
The meeting format would remain the same.
With the virtual only option, there will be few changes. One that will be coming at the start of
the year is that all technology support will have to be performed at the Council office and no
longer at CM homes.
There would be no additional technology costs other than routine maintenance.
Dave Rohde will no longer be on call for Council meeting needs, but there may be times when
we need his technological expertise, for those time he will be available.
Hybrid Meeting Considerations
New equipment or updating of our current equipment?
Yes — if we go to a hybrid meeting model, we will need approximately $10,000 or so to
make those changes.
Additional staffing —
Yes. If we go to the hybrid format, Council will need additional support due to the
technology coordination challenges. Extra staff will be required to manage the audio
and the visual as someone is required to monitor camera angles. To have on -going tech
support, we will have to consider an RFQ for services, which could cost around $60,000.
We have asked for the contract information from a neighboring city for their Council's
A/V technical support.
Meeting Management —
1. A/V capability. We need a system that easily bridges the in -person and virtual
attendees. Currently, Scott Passey, the Mayor and Dave Rohde help manage the virtual
platform, Jerrie records the video and changes camera inputs, and Scott
encodes/stream the video to the website. The video is automatically streamed to the
government access channels (GAC). Scott controls microphones in the chamber,
changes the video inputs for the in -person attendees, and runs the timer. As you can
see, the A/V responsibilities are spread over several people, which requires a lot of
coordination to ensure a successful hybrid meeting. The burden on Scott with all the
added technical responsibilities can impact his ability to follow the discussion/motions
and/or respond to immediate needs. Not to mention fielding emails and texts in real
time, it is a lot to keep straight.
2. Managing the queue of in -person and virtual speakers. In -person speakers will always
have an advantage over virtual speakers because it's easier to get the chair's attention.
We suggest setting some ground rules and realistic expectations about how to balance
in -person and virtual speakers.
Packet Pg. 332
9.2.a
3. City Attorney Taraday has concluded that we can't force Council to attend in -person, per
the Governor's Emergency Order adding the COVID protocols with the OPMA, allowing
the virtual option to be available for everyone. Even before COVID, councilmembers
could participate remotely by phone. Zoom is our option of choice because it provides
the lowest barrier to participation (telephone), per the Governor's emergency
proclamation. Even after the emergency is lifted, we assume the new normal will be
providing phone access to public meetings. Edmonds' code has provisions that allow
Councilmember participation via phone access, after the health emergency is
concluded, this may merit revisiting.
4. Executive Sessions using the hybrid model would require those Councilmembers in the
Council chambers to use their devices for that session and retire into the Jury Room or
add technology to the Jury Room that would enable Council or others to participate on
an interactive video screen, at additional cost.
Masks? Vaccine verification? Room Capacity? Room Monitor?
These are issues that Council would need to determine. The room monitor could be
from the same contractor that the Court uses. The cost is about $30/hr.
Packet Pg. 333
9.2.a
Data regarding public participation Dec. 2020 — 2021
Total Participants by Month
450 420
400
353
350
305
30C
250
205
20C 171 159 173 183
152 148
15C 120 133
95
100
Sc
0
Dec-20 Jan-21 Fe6-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 ❑ec-21
Unique Participants by Meeting
300
250 246
200 196
150
100
106 89 110
97
82 81
74 73 68
59
50 d12
44 43 41 46 44 41 40 42 40 39 44 49 37 49 44 so 37
0
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a a a a > > > > c c c c c oo uo uo uo uo a a a +% +% +% +% > > > > > >
v v v v '° '° '° '° u u u u a a a a ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 v v v
0 0 0 0 a a a a¢ a a a a o 0 0 o z z z z z z o 0 0
.i W O N N N N N N lD N N m N lO O N O N 0b V1 A W rN-I N N E `i O^ N N M V 0� 7^ W N N N N
N N N
* Council meetings were "hybrid" on July 20, July 27, August 3, and August 17, 2021.
4
Packet Pg. 334
9.2.a
Updated COVID-19 Information
Snohomish Health District Cases as of 12/28/21
Confirmed 71,010 +2,787
Probable 8,134 +167
Deaths 861 +12*
COVID-19 CASES REPORTED IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY BY DATE (UPDATED WEEKLY)
53
51
SW
Z 31]
26
WE
5
Packet Pg. 335
9.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Ordinance amending Streateries Regulations
Staff Lead: Susan McLaughlin
Department: Development Services
Preparer: Susan McLaughlin
Background/History
Ordinance #4209 permitting Streateries in the City right-of-way was adopted by the City Council on
December 15, 2020. The Ordinance was set to sunset on December 31, 2021 and was superceded on
December 16, 2021 by Ordinance #4243 to enable Streatery permit extensions.
Staff Recommendation
Approve an ordinance amendment to:
1) Change the Streatery extension fee from $4000 to $2000 ($1000 for one space streateries)
2) Allow the Streatery extension fee to be paid in monthly installments
3) Extend the Streatery permit to expire on May 31, 2022
4) Enable administrative cost recovery from Streatery fee to cover permit review, inspection, and
issuance.
Narrative
On December 16th, Council approved Ordinance #4243 to allow the extension of Streateries permits
beyond the original sunset date of December 31, 2021. The fee that is required in Ordinance #4243 is
disproportionate to other cities permit fees, averaging 30x than the average. Restaurants have vocalized
their concerns about their inability to pay for the permit extension, which could lead to unintended
consequences of losing these safe, outdoor eating options while the COVID19 public health crisis is still
not behind us.
A draft ordinance to amend Ordinance #4243 to address the fee concerns has been prepared for Council
consideration and approval.
Background
COVID-19 has created significant impacts to people's health and well-being, which includes not only
immediate physical health, but economic health. Washington's Governor has been proactive in trying to
responsibly address coronavirus issues and some of his actions have included orders to close, or partially
close, businesses where COVID-19 transmission has the most risk. In Edmonds, food and beverage
services, such as restaurants, have been especially impacted by full and partial closures. COVID-related
restrictions on restaurants and similar businesses have limited or prohibited indoor dining over most of
the past two years. Even without a state order, many people that want to eat at a restaurant would still
Packet Pg. 336
9.3
prefer to do so in an outdoor environment rather than inside an enclosed restaurant. The new Omicron
variant indicates that the risk of COVID-19 transmission is not behind us. It emphasizes the need to take
precautious measures to protect public health and safety until we are certain that the risk of COVID-19
transmission is lessened and the pandemic is over, or at a level where public confidence to eat indoors
without a mask is more universal.
In addition to Edmonds, a brief survey of other jurisdictions showed a number of other cities have
Streateries and have already extended their program or intend to do so. A sampling of jurisdictions that
have extended their programs and/or made them permanent include: Kirkland, Bellevue, Bellingham,
Everett, Tacoma, Spokane, and Anacortes. Permit fees vary per jurisdiction; however, waiving fees is the
most common approach based on our research.
There are currently 17 Streateries in Downtown Edmonds and 16 of those have pulled permits. The 17th
Streatery is in the permit process. The permit process requires an engineering inspection, a building
inspection and fire inspection.
Attachments:
Draft Ordinance amending Streateries
Ordinance 4243
Ord4209
Packet Pg. 337
9.3.a
ORDINANCE NO.42_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 4243 AND
CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC, ENTITLED "STREET USE AND
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS," TO EXTEND THE
ALLOWANCE FOR "STREATERIES" (DINING IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
WHEREAS, COVID-19 has created significant impacts to people's health and well-being,
which includes not only immediate physical health, but economic health; and
WHEREAS, Washington's Governor has been proactive in trying to responsibly address
coronavirus issues and some of his actions have included orders to close or partially close
businesses where COVID-19 transmission has the most risk; and
WHEREAS, in Edmonds, food and beverage services, such as restaurants, have been
especially impacted by full and partial closures; and
WHEREAS, COVID-related restrictions on restaurants and similar businesses could arise
again as the COVID-19 virus continues to mutate and vaccination rates remain lower than may be
needed to end the pandemic; and
WHEREAS, even without a state order, many people that want to eat at a restaurant would
prefer to do so in an outdoor environment, rather than indoors, especially as the COVID-19 virus
continues to mutate and each mutation raises questions about whether even the vaccinated are
adequately protected; and
WHEREAS, in August 2020, the City issued a special event permit to allow outdoor dining
in designated vehicle parking spaces within the public right-of-way until October 11, 2020, and
said permit was extended until November 8, 2020, and then again, until December 31, 2020 or the
effective date of a Council -adopted ordinance for streateries, whichever comes sooner; and
WHEREAS, City staff has worked to develop amendments to the Edmonds Community
Development Code that would allow outdoor dining in designated parking spaces in the public
right-of-way (i.e., "streateries") through an individual permitting process and more specific
standards; and
1
Packet Pg. 338
9.3.a
WHEREAS, the concepts for amending the code to allow streateries were presented in a
November 12, 2020 meeting of the City Council's Public Safety, Planning, and Personnel
Committee and subsequently presented in a November 24, 2020 meeting of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the concepts for streateries have been incorporated into a set of amendments
to Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, which regulations were
originally adopted through Ordinance 4209 on December 15, 2020; and
WHEREAS, those regulations contained a sunset clause that prevents streateries from
operating beyond Decmeber 31, 2021 without city council action to amend this code; and
WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on December 7, 2021 regarding
streateries; and
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4243 on December 16, 2021 to extend the
sunset date for streateries; and
WHEREAS, the city council would now like to amendment Ordinance 4243;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Street
Use and Encroachment Permits," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown
in underline; deleted text is shown in strike through).
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Packet Pg. 339
9.3.a
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city
council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
3
December 2021
December 2021
December 2021
December 2021
42_
Packet Pg. 340
9.3.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.42_
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the �h day of December, 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 42_. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 4243 AND
CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC, ENTITLED "STREET USE AND
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS," TO EXTEND THE
ALLOWANCE FOR "STREATERIES" (DINING IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of December, 2021.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
E
Packet Pg. 341
9.3.a
Chapter 18.70
STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
Sections:
Exhibit A
18.70.000 Permits required.
18.70.010 Exemptions.
18.70.020 Applications.
18.70.030 Review.
18.70.040 Revocation.
18.70.050 Fees.
18.70.000 Permits required.
No person shall use or encroach upon any public place without obtaining a permit from the development
services director or city engineer.
A. Encroachment Permit. An encroachment permit is required to encroach upon any portion of city public
space, right-of-way or easement area with permanent structures. "To encroach" means to construct, erect or
maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, easement, roadway, parking strip and/or
sidewalk, including the airspace above them, any structures permanent in nature, including but not limited
to building extension, marquee, fence, retaining wall, artwork, or any other building or structure.
B. Street Use Permit. A street use permit is required to use any portion of public space or city right-of-way
for objects which are temporary in nature.
1. To "use" means to place or maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, roadway,
parking strip and/or sidewalk, including the air space above them, any temporary or movable object.
2. "Temporary in nature," in reference to street use permits, means not having or requiring permanent
attachment to the ground, or involving structures which have no required permanent attachment to the
ground.
3. "Temporary object' for the purposes of this chapter refers to all objects placed in the right-of-way
that are temporary in nature including but not limited to chairs, tables, planters, sandwich boards,
benches, stanchions, platforms, rope, and fencing.
None of the above definitions shall be interpreted to prohibit the parking of a properly licensed vehicle
within the parking strip adjacent to their property line of sight, and street plantings, except as otherwise
provided in ECDC 18.70.030.C.6.
18.70.020 Applications.
Applications for street use or encroachment permits shall contain, in addition to the information required
under any other applicable city code, the following information:
A. Street Use Permit.
1. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Certificate of insurance.
4. Complete street use or streatery permit application.
5
Packet Pg. 342
9.3.a
B. Encroachment Permit.
1. Critical areas determination, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
4. Partial site plan, to be recorded with Snohomish County, clearly showing proposed encroachment,
private property lines, all existing structures and driveways, easements and/or public property
(developed or undeveloped).
5. Legal description, including copies of all recorded easements on the property.
6. Elevation view or side view of the proposed encroachment.
7. Ownership. Evidence showing the applicant to be the agent record owner of the property
immediately adjoining the public place or right-of-way. An application to place artwork in the public
right-of-way will be exempt from this requirement.
8. Certificate of insurance.
9. Complete encroachment permit application.
10. Complete encroachment agreement, to be recorded with Snohomish County.
C. Such other information as the city engineer or designee of the development services director shall
require.
D. The encroachment agreement shall require prompt removal of the encroachment by the applicant at
his/her/its expense upon reasonable demand by the city engineer and be legally adequate for recording in
the land records of Snohomish County and the chain of title of the applicant's property. Such encroachment
agreements may be executed as acknowledged on behalf of the city by the city engineer and recorded by
the city clerk following approval as to form by the city attorney.
18.70.030 Review.
A. Architectural Design Board. Any application for a permit to construct, erect or maintain an awning,
marquee, sign or any structure in a public place, except as otherwise allowed in ECDC 18.70.030.C, may
be referred by the development services director or his/her designee to the architectural design board. If
referred to the board, the board shall review the plans and specifications as they relate to Chapter 20.10
ECDC.
Applications for mobile street vending units shall be reviewed in accordance with ECC 4.12.055 by the
architectural design board.
B. Edmonds Arts Commission. Applications for an encroachment permit or a street use permit to install art
in the public right-of-way shall be subject to the review and recommendation of the Edmonds arts
commission. No art shall be permitted in the public right-of-way except as expressly permitted herein.
Artwork that is reviewed under an encroachment permit shall be exempt of the requirements of ECDC
18.70.020(B)(5), (6), (7) and (10).
1. The terms "art" or "artwork" as used in this section shall refer only to a work of visual art existing
in a single copy or in multiple copies of 200 or fewer that are consecutively numbered by the author
and bear the signature or other identifying mark of the author.
2. The terms "art" or artwork" do not include:
on
Packet Pg. 343
9.3.a
a. Any poster, map, globe, chart, technical drawing, diagram, model, applied art, motion picture
or other audiovisual work, book, magazine, newspaper, periodical, database, electronic
information service, electronic publication, or similar publication;
b. Any merchandising item or advertising, promotional, descriptive, covering, or packaging
material or container;
c. Architectural details such as masonry, ironwork, or other building fixtures or materials;
d. Any portion or part of any item described in subsection (A), (B) or (C) of this section;
e. Any work not subject to copyright protection under the Visual Artists Rights Act, as codified
under federal copyright law, U.S.C. Title 17, as the same exists or is hereafter amended.
3. An encroachment permit or street use permit requires determination of public benefit. The Edmonds
arts commission (EAC) is mandated in Chapter 10.20 ECC to advise the city on matters pertaining to
art. When the proposed encroachment or street use is art, EAC will review and make written
recommendations to the community services director and city engineer for use and consideration in
permit issuance. (See subsection (C) of this section.)
4. The public right-of-way is a traditional forum for public expression. By this permit program the city
acknowledges that it is approving uses in a limited public forum. Art, like other exercises of First
Amendment rights, may be limited by reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. In this case,
these criteria will be utilized to protect the safety of the public who use the right-of-way for pedestrian
or vehicular traffic and to ensure that the city provides for accessibility for the disabled. No
recommendation or denial shall be based upon the content or message expressed by an artist or in a
work of art as long as there is no commercial content. Applicants are encouraged to coordinate their
artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -oriented character of the
downtown area.
5. Specific submission requirements for EAC review include, but are not limited to:
a. Site plan sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum one -quarter -inch scale rendering of the art concept or art component, including at
least one elevation showing the art in context or comparable photographs of actual artwork in
context;
c. Material/color samples;
d. Model (optional);
e. Written proposal: seven copies of a written proposal in eight and one-half by 11-inch format to
include:
i. A description and summary of a final design proposal for the artwork for the proposed
project;
ii. Detailed maintenance requirements;
iii. Schedule for development, fabrication, and completion;
iv. Artists' resume/background;
v. Evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or designee.
For proposal to be reviewed at next scheduled EAC meeting, a complete submission of all
requirements must be received a minimum of 10 days prior to the date of the meeting.
7
Packet Pg. 344
9.3.a
Additional requirements may be requested based on staff input or information sought by EAC
members.
6. Review Criteria. Art in public places may be art standing alone, modifiers or definers of space,
functional, or used to establish identity. The use of art as an integral part of the structure and function
of building is encouraged, e.g., the interpretation of light fixtures, benches, hardware, doors, surface
finishes, walkways, gates, and other features with the artwork or as a part of the artwork, although
only some of these elements would occur in the public right-of-way.
The criteria for review of encroachment or street use review artwork submissions are as follows:
a. Constructability of proposed artwork. No artwork shall impair disabled accessibility and
barrier -free design requirements.
b. Artist's credentials and recognition.
c. Durability and craftsmanship in fabrication and production quality. Quality of the work is a
high priority.
d. Due consideration shall be given to the structural and surface soundness of artworks and to
their permanence, including ability to withstand age, theft, vandalism, weathering, and
maintenance and possible related repair costs. Careful consideration shall be given to the
materials used and the appropriateness of those materials for the conditions of the site.
e. Coordination of the artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -
oriented character of the downtown area is encouraged.
f. Maintenance/conservation plan.
g. Relationship to other existing artwork in vicinity.
h. No Commercial Content. Artwork shall not be used as signage (see definition of signage).
C. Issuance by the Development Services Director or City Engineer. The development services director,
city engineer or their respective designee may administratively, without hearing, approve a street use or
encroachment permit if:
1. The proposed use shall not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic, including but not limited to
the following requirements:
a. No portion of the public right-of-way designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking
shall be permanently occupied, except to the extent allowed under ECDC 18.70.30.C.6.
b. Requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to all provisions relating to
disabled accessibility and barrier -free design requirements shall be met;
c. Any mobile vending units shall be properly licensed pursuant to Chapter 4.12 ECC;
d. Permit application fees have been paid (see ECDC 18.70.050);
e. A "clear zone" must be maintained on public sidewalks or walkways. A clear zone refers to an
area seven feet in height and five feet in width providing a level, safe walking surface along the
public sidewalk. Clear zone on sidewalks shall not include any curbing, planting strips or ramps.
For tables and chairs placed in the public right-of-way, the clear zone can be reduced to four feet
in width in front of obstacles (trees, street lights, sign posts, etc.);
Packet Pg. 345
9.3.a
f. All temporary objects shall be removed from the right-of-way on 24 hours' notice to
accommodate public events. Temporary objects are subject to removal in the event of an
emergency; and
g. All temporary objects, excluding approved awnings, wall signs, and permitted streateries, fkat
that project more than 36 inches into the right-of-way shall be removed each day at the close of
business.
2. Exclusive Sidewalk Dining. In an effort to enhance street life of the city and serve both an
economic development purpose as well as enhance the livability of the city's urban core, exclusive
sidewalk dining shall be allowed pursuant to ECDC 17.70.040.
a. For purposes of this section the following terms are defined as:
i. "Exclusive sidewalk dining" shall refer to a properly zoned and licensed food or beverage
service establishment that uses the public right-of-way to serve only its customers at the
exclusion of the general public.
ii. "Barrier" shall refer to any temporary object or objects (e.g., stanchion, rope, , markers)
used to establish an exclusive bistro and outdoor dining area. Barriers shall be approved by
the city engineer.
b. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate
compensation for the exclusive use of the public right-of-way and applicant fees pursuant to
ECDC 18.70.050 have been paid.
c. All barriers, with the exception of markers and marking, shall be removed each day from the
right-of-way at the close of business.
d. The design and use shall comply with all requirements of state law, city ordinance and city
policy including but not limited to:
i. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) and Snohomish County health
division (SCHD). When applicable, the business shall provide a written approval from the
WSLCB and/or SCHD for use of public rights -of -way;
ii. ECDC 17.70.040, Exclusive sidewalk dining; and
iii. All litter and nuisance regulations, including but not limited to RCW 70.93.060 and
Chapter 6.40 ECC.
3. The design board has reviewed and approved any proposal which includes a request to construct,
erect or maintain an awning, building, sign or any building or structure, except as otherwise allowed in
ECDC 18.70.030.C;
4. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and
5. The proposal (if for an encroachment permit) either benefits the public interest, safety or
convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city street, reduces pedestrian hazards) or is an accessory
structure such as a fence normally associated with residential use of the property and fully complies
with the requirements of subsections (13)(1) through (3) of this section.
6. Streateries. Streatery means a type of parklet located within the public right of way, typically in a
vehicle parking space, that has been designed to allow for food and beverage services. To provide greater
opportunities for outdoor dining and beverage service, streateries may be permitted, subject to the
following requirements:
9
Packet Pg. 346
9.3.a
a. A streatery may be permitted as a type of street use in the parking lane of any public street on a
block where retail or restaurant use is located.
b. The business applying for the streatery is herein after referred to as the Permittee.
c. Streateries must meet applicable city and state statutes, including for fire, electrical, and building
safety, as well as for liquor service and other applicable agency requirements.
d. Streateries must be operated in a manner that complies with orders from the state health
department or governor related to coronavirus protection and with health district standards for
food and beverage service or with this chapter, whichever is stricter.
e. A complete street use permit application for a streatery shall be submitted to the city on a form
provided by the development services department. City review of any streatery application will be
completed in a timely manner and include opportunity for review by engineering, building, and
fire staff. A street use permit for the streatery may be issued with any conditions as necessary.
Field inspection will follow.
f. [reserved]
g. Expiration and termination.
i. A streatery permit may be extended in up to six-month increments, PROVIDED THAT it
passes a final inspection for code compliance prior to the permit extension AND THAT
no streatery may continue to operate or hold space in the right-of-way beyond the sunset
date in subsection 6.p, below, regardless of the expiration date set forth on the permit.
ii. If the streatery has been cited with more than three violations of the city code within a
12-month period, its permit may be terminated.
iii. After the streatery has begun operating or within 30 days of street use permit approval,
whichever is first, if the streatery is not used by the applicant for at least 15 days of any
30-day period, the City may terminate the permit in order to avoid leaving the parking
space unavailable for use. A notice of potential termination shall be provided by the City
to the permittee at least ten days in advance of any termination taking effect.
h. Number of allowed streateries. In the BD zone, after the first 20 streateries have been approved,
no more streatery permits shall be accepted by the City unless the permit is to replace an existing
streatery or this section is amended to allow additional streateries. A business is allowed to have
no more than one streatery permit.
i. Location.
i. A streatery must be located fully or partially adjacent to the business that it serves,
provided that if the business is not adjacent to one or more suitable parking spaces,
another business or property owner may give its written concurrence for the parking
space in front of it to be used for a streatery.
ii. All streatery use shall be entirely within the approved space(s) and shall not extend into
the travel lane of the public right-of-way.
iii. Streateries shall not be located in ADA parking stalls, in front of fire hydrants or bus
stops, or over the top of city storm catch basins.
iv. The maximum length of a streatery is two vehicle parking spaces. For corner locations,
the two spaces may be comprised of one parking space on each of the adjacent
intersecting streets.
V. No more than two streateries shall be located next to each other.
vi. Where only one parking space exists between two streateries on a block face, each of the
two streateries must be set back at least one foot from the intervening parking space.
Other site requirements.
i. A streatery must be located on an ADA-accessible raised platform that is flush with the
sidewalk and has no more than a''/z- inch horizontal gap between the sidewalk and
platform. The platform must be ADA-accessible from the public sidewalk and, upon
entering the streatery, a wheelchair -user must be able to access at least one seat at a table
on the platform. Exception: A streatery may be allowed without a platform if the
10
Packet Pg. 347
9.3.a
business has other open-air dining that is ADA- compliant and available for customer
use.
ii. Each streatery must be protected at its end(s) from any adjacent vehicle parking space by
a water -filled jersey barrier, substantial planter at least 30 inches high, or other approved
barrier. The preferred color for a jersey barrier is white. Each barrier must include
adequate lighting or reflective markings, as approved by the city engineer, for night-time
visibility to drivers.
iii. Screening shall be located on the streatery side that is adjacent to and parallel with the
traffic lane. Such screening shall be at least 30 inches high and primarily consist of. (a)
lattice, picket, or solid fencing; (b) fabric or membrane material; or (c) containerized
plantings where the container is at least 30 inches in height. Above 36 inches in height,
any screening from the traffic lane will have views into and out of the streatery. An
applicant may propose a different material that provides both external views and a sense
of separation, subject to approval by the building official. Reflecting markings or
lighting, as approved by the city engineer, are required along the traffic side for night-
time visibility to drivers.
iv. All tents, canopies, fabric screens, and umbrellas are subject to approval by the building
official for any structural requirements and by the fire marshal for flame-retardance.
Tents and canopies must be fully open to the air on at least one side. If the open side is
less than 8 linear feet, a second side must have ventilation.
V. Tents, canopies, awnings, fabric screens, and umbrellas that are documented as being
purchased by the applicant prior to January 1, 2021, may be of any color. Otherwise, the
color of said items shall be primarily yellow, white, or red, or any combination of those
colors. Material that is transparent may also be acceptable.
vi. Fuel -burning heaters and open flames, such as candles, torches and fire pits, are not
allowed within 3 feet of any fabric (including tents and canopies) unless approved by the
fire marshal.
k. Signage. A streatery shall have no more than one sign. The allowed sign does not need a separate
permit but must be no more than eighteen inches in length and eight inches in height and must not
be internally lit nor have components that wave or otherwise appear to move. The sign shall not be
placed on the longest side of the streatery facing traffic and shall not be attached to the ground. It
may be attached to or part of a streatery component but cannot interfere with traffic or sight
visibility.
1. Maintenance. The permittee is responsible for maintenance of all streatery components, including
surface and furniture cleaning and keeping the area underneath and adjacent to the streatery free of
obstruction so that stormwater can flow freely at the curb.
m. Insurance. Insurance is required, per ECDC 18.70.030.G.
n. Installation and removal. The permittee is responsible for providing and installing all components
of the streatery and for removing the components when the permit has expired. The City may also
remove or require removal of the streatery as needed to deal with emergency conditions or
infrastructure repair.
o. City staff may provide additional details or guidance for applicants to implement this section,
consistent with direction from the city engineer and the development services director or their
respective designees.
p. This subsection C.6 shall sunset on April-39May 31, 2022.
D. Bay Windows, Decks, and Related Architectural Features. In an effort to allow for more creative
designs and a better overall appearance in the downtown area, bay windows, decks, and related
architectural features may encroach into the public right-of-way within the central business district or any
other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required, subject to the following requirements:
1. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate compensation
has been paid;
11
Packet Pg. 348
9.3.a
2. The encroachment shall not occur over alleys;
3. The building encroachment shall not project more than two feet (24 inches) into the right-of-way;
4. The encroachment shall not exceed 30 percent of the length of the facade on any one side of the
building;
5. The encroachment shall provide for a minimum clearance height of eight feet over any pedestrian
right-of-way and a minimum clearance height of 11 feet over any vehicular right-of-way, whichever is
greater;
6. The encroachment shall be approved by the architectural design board as contributing to a
modulated facade design which enhances the variation and appearance to the public of the overall
building design and public streetscape.
E. Appeal. The decision of the development services director, city engineer, or their respective designees
may be appealed to the hearing examiner as a Type II proceeding under the procedures set forth in Chapter
20.06 ECDC; provided, however, that the establishment of compensation for use of the public right-of-way
is a legislative decision of the city council and is not subject to judicial review.
F. Awnings and Canopies. Consistent with ECDC 22.43.040, awnings and canopies, whether architectural
or temporary, excluding those permitted under ECDC 18.70.030.C.6, may encroach into the public right of
way within the central business district or any other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required,
subject to the following:
1. The awning or canopy shall provide a minimum clearance height of 8 feet above the walking
surface, not to exceed 15 feet at its highest point.
2. Awning and canopy projection over the right of way shall be determined as follows, provided
that no awning or canopy shall project within two feet of the street curb (measured from the
back of curb):
Sidewalk Width Minimum Projection
Less than 8 feet 5 feet
8 feet or greater 6 feet
3. Awning and canopies shall not be constructed at a location or in a manner that will obstruct,
obsure, or interfere with any streetlight, flower pole, utility pole or appurtenance, street tree,
or any transportation -related sign, signal, or traffic control device.
4. All awning and canopy designs shall meet the above criteria, unless otherwise approved by
the city engineer.
G. Insurance Requirement. When the application is for use or encroachment onto a public right-of-way
including but not limited to streets, roads, alleys, trails, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian easements, and
any other easement intended for the use of the public, the applicant who operates a business or commercial
operation shall be required to provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of
insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be
primary as to any other policy of insurance. The policy must contain the additional insured statement,
coverage amounts and cancellation notification indicated on the sample insurance form provided by the
city. In addition, a business and commercial applicant as well as all residential or nonprofit applicants shall
sign a covenant to hold harmless and indemnify the city which will be recorded and run with the land in a
form approved by the city attorney.
H. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the base or ground support for any sign to be located upon
or attached to the ground within the public right-of-way.
18.70.040 Revocation.
A. Except as provided below, all permits approved under this chapter shall be temporary, shall vest no
permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the city upon
30 days' notice, or without notice in the event any such use or occupation shall become dangerous; any
12
Packet Pg. 349
9.3.a
structure or obstruction so permitted shall become insecure or unsafe; shall become a public nuisance; or
shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The
determination by the city engineer that a structure is dangerous, insecure, unsafe, a nuisance or has not been
constructed, used or maintained in accord with this chapter shall be conclusive.
B. Permits shall also be revoked if:
1. Following written notice of the lapse of an insurance policy required to be maintained by ECDC
18.70.030(F), the permittee fails to supply a valid certificate of insurance; or
2. Following written notice of the lapse of an annual application fee, renewal fee, or fees for the
exclusive use of the right-of-way by ECDC 18.70.050(B), the permittee fails to bring fees/account
current.
C. If any such structure, obstruction, use or occupancy is not discontinued on notice to do so by the city
engineer and within the time period designated, the city engineer may remove any structure or obstruction,
or make such repairs upon the structure or obstruction as may be necessary to render the same secure and
safe, at the expense of the permittee, or his successor, and such expense may be recorded as a lien and
otherwise collected in the manner provided by law.
18.70.050 Fees.
A. Application fees for street use or encroachment permits are those established by the city council by
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. Application fees shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of any
permit.
B. Fees for the exclusive use of the public right-of-way are those established by the city council by
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. The fee to extend a streatery permit through April 30May 31,
2022 shall be a lump sum payment of $4 000 $2,000, payable in monthly installments of $500 with the first
payment due by January 15, PROVIDED THAT streatery operators not wishing to pay the permit
extension fee shall remove the streatery from the right-of-way no later than 11:59 pm on January 15, 2022.
If the streatery only occupies one parking space, the fee is $1000, payable in monthly installments of $250
with the first payment due by January 15. The streatery extension fee collected, after subtracting an
appropriate amount to cover streatery-related administrative costs, shall be used to rent parking spaces that
will be made available to the public.
C. There shall be no judicial appeal from a determination of the compensation to be paid for the use of
public right-of-way.
13
Packet Pg. 350
9.3.b
ORDINANCE NO.4243
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT
PERMITS," TO EXTEND THE ALLOWANCE FOR
"STREATERIES" (DINING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
WHEREAS, COVID-19 has created significant impacts to people's health and well-being,
which includes not only immediate physical health, but economic health; and
WHEREAS, Washington's Governor has been proactive in trying to responsibly address
coronavirus issues and some of his actions have included orders to close or partially close
businesses where COVID-19 transmission has the most risk; and
WHEREAS, in Edmonds, food and beverage services, such as restaurants, have been
especially impacted by full and partial closures; and
WHEREAS, COVID-related restrictions on restaurants and similar businesses could arise
again as the COVID-19 virus continues to mutate and vaccination rates remain lower than may be
needed to end the pandemic; and
WHEREAS, even without a state order, many people that want to eat at a restaurant would
prefer to do so in an outdoor environment, rather than indoors, especially as the COVID-19 virus
continues to mutate and each mutation raises questions about whether even the vaccinated are
adequately protected; and
WHEREAS, in August 2020, the City issued a special event permit to allow outdoor dining
in designated vehicle parking spaces within the public right-of-way until October 11, 2020, and
said permit was extended until November 8, 2020, and then again, until December 31, 2020 or the
effective date of a Council -adopted ordinance for streateries, whichever comes sooner; and
WHEREAS, City staff has worked to develop amendments to the Edmonds Community
Development Code that would allow outdoor dining in designated parking spaces in the public
right-of-way (i.e., "streateries") through an individual permitting process and more specific
standards; and
Packet Pg. 351
9.3.b
WHEREAS, the concepts for amending the code to allow streateries were presented in a
November 12, 2020 meeting of the City Council's Public Safety, Planning, and Personnel
Committee and subsequently presented in a November 24, 2020 meeting of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the concepts for streateries have been incorporated into a set of amendments
to Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, which regulations were
originally adopted through Ordinance 4209 on December 15, 2020; and
WHEREAS, those regulations contained a sunset clause that prevents streateries from
operating beyond Decmeber 31, 2021 without city council action to amend this code; and
WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on December 7, 2021 regarding
streateries; and
WHEREAS, the city council, being fully informed on the issue would like to extend the
sunset date for streateries; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Street
Use and Encroachment Permits," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown
in underline; deleted text is shown in s#ike through).
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city
council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
2
Packet Pg. 352
9.3.b
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
3
December 10, 2021
December 16, 2021
December _, 2021
December _, 2021
4243
Packet Pg. 353
9.3.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4243
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 161 day of December, 2021, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 4243. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT
PERMITS," TO EXTEND THE ALLOWANCE FOR
"STREATERIES" (DINING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-
WAY)
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of December, 2021.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
F
Packet Pg. 354
9.3.b
Exhibit A
Chapter 18.70
STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
Sections:
18.70.000 Permits required.
18.70.010 Exemptions.
18.70.020 Applications.
18.70.030 Review.
18.70.040 Revocation.
18.70.050 Fees.
18.70.000 Permits required.
No person shall use or encroach upon any public place without obtaining a permit from the development
services director or city engineer.
A. Encroachment Permit. An encroachment permit is required to encroach upon any portion of city public
space, right-of-way or easement area with permanent structures. "To encroach" means to construct, erect or
maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, easement, roadway, parking strip and/or
sidewalk, including the airspace above them, any structures permanent in nature, including but not limited
to building extension, marquee, fence, retaining wall, artwork, or any other building or structure.
B. Street Use Permit. A street use permit is required to use any portion of public space or city right-of-way
for objects which are temporary in nature.
1. To "use" means to place or maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, roadway,
parking strip and/or sidewalk, including the air space above them, any temporary or movable object.
2. "Temporary in nature," in reference to street use permits, means not having or requiring permanent
attachment to the ground, or involving structures which have no required permanent attachment to the
ground.
3. "Temporary object" for the purposes of this chapter refers to all objects placed in the right-of-way
that are temporary in nature including but not limited to chairs, tables, planters, sandwich boards,
benches, stanchions, platforms, rope, and fencing.
None of the above definitions shall be interpreted to prohibit the parking of a properly licensed vehicle
within the parking strip adjacent to their property line of sight, and street plantings, except as otherwise
provided in ECDC 18.70.030.C.6.
18.70.020 Applications.
Applications for street use or encroachment permits shall contain, in addition to the information required
under any other applicable city code, the following information:
A. Street Use Permit.
1. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Certificate of insurance.
4. Complete street use or streatery permit application.
5
Packet Pg. 355
9.3.b
B. Encroachment Permit.
1. Critical areas determination, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
4. Partial site plan, to be recorded with Snohomish County, clearly showing proposed encroachment,
private property lines, all existing structures and driveways, easements and/or public property
(developed or undeveloped).
5. Legal description, including copies of all recorded easements on the property.
6. Elevation view or side view of the proposed encroachment.
7. Ownership. Evidence showing the applicant to be the agent record owner of the property
immediately adjoining the public place or right-of-way. An application to place artwork in the public
right-of-way will be exempt from this requirement.
8. Certificate of insurance.
9. Complete encroachment permit application.
10. Complete encroachment agreement, to be recorded with Snohomish County.
C. Such other information as the city engineer or designee of the development services director shall
require.
D. The encroachment agreement shall require prompt removal of the encroachment by the applicant at
his/her/its expense upon reasonable demand by the city engineer and be legally adequate for recording in
the land records of Snohomish County and the chain of title of the applicant's property. Such encroachment
agreements may be executed as acknowledged on behalf of the city by the city engineer and recorded by
the city clerk following approval as to form by the city attorney.
18.70.030 Review.
A. Architectural Design Board. Any application for a permit to construct, erect or maintain an awning,
marquee, sign or any structure in a public place, except as otherwise allowed in ECDC 18.70.030.C, may
be referred by the development services director or his/her designee to the architectural design board. If
referred to the board, the board shall review the plans and specifications as they relate to Chapter 20.10
ECDC.
Applications for mobile street vending units shall be reviewed in accordance with ECC 4.12.055 by the
architectural design board.
B. Edmonds Arts Commission. Applications for an encroachment permit or a street use permit to install art
in the public right-of-way shall be subject to the review and recommendation of the Edmonds arts
commission. No art shall be permitted in the public right-of-way except as expressly permitted herein.
Artwork that is reviewed under an encroachment permit shall be exempt of the requirements of ECDC
18.70.020(B)(5), (6), (7) and (10).
1. The terms "art" or "artwork" as used in this section shall refer only to a work of visual art existing
in a single copy or in multiple copies of 200 or fewer that are consecutively numbered by the author
and bear the signature or other identifying mark of the author.
2. The terms "art" or artwork" do not include:
C
Packet Pg. 356
9.3.b
a. Any poster, map, globe, chart, technical drawing, diagram, model, applied art, motion picture
or other audiovisual work, book, magazine, newspaper, periodical, database, electronic
information service, electronic publication, or similar publication;
b. Any merchandising item or advertising, promotional, descriptive, covering, or packaging
material or container;
c. Architectural details such as masonry, ironwork, or other building fixtures or materials;
d. Any portion or part of any item described in subsection (A), (B) or (C) of this section;
e. Any work not subject to copyright protection under the Visual Artists Rights Act, as codified
under federal copyright law, U.S.C. Title 17, as the same exists or is hereafter amended.
3. An encroachment permit or street use permit requires determination of public benefit. The Edmonds
arts commission (EAC) is mandated in Chapter 10.20 ECC to advise the city on matters pertaining to
art. When the proposed encroachment or street use is art, EAC will review and make written
recommendations to the community services director and city engineer for use and consideration in
permit issuance. (See subsection (C) of this section.)
4. The public right-of-way is a traditional forum for public expression. By this permit program the city
acknowledges that it is approving uses in a limited public forum. Art, like other exercises of First
Amendment rights, may be limited by reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. In this case,
these criteria will be utilized to protect the safety of the public who use the right-of-way for pedestrian
or vehicular traffic and to ensure that the city provides for accessibility for the disabled. No
recommendation or denial shall be based upon the content or message expressed by an artist or in a
work of art as long as there is no commercial content. Applicants are encouraged to coordinate their
artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -oriented character of the
downtown area.
5. Specific submission requirements for EAC review include, but are not limited to:
a. Site plan sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum one -quarter -inch scale rendering of the art concept or art component, including at
least one elevation showing the art in context or comparable photographs of actual artwork in
context;
c. Material/color samples;
d. Model (optional);
e. Written proposal: seven copies of a written proposal in eight and one-half by 11-inch format to
include:
i. A description and summary of a final design proposal for the artwork for the proposed
proj ect;
ii. Detailed maintenance requirements;
iii. Schedule for development, fabrication, and completion;
iv. Artists' resume/background;
v. Evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or designee.
For proposal to be reviewed at next scheduled EAC meeting, a complete submission of all
requirements must be received a minimum of 10 days prior to the date of the meeting.
7
Packet Pg. 357
9.3.b
Additional requirements may be requested based on staff input or information sought by EAC
members.
6. Review Criteria. Art in public places may be art standing alone, modifiers or definers of space,
functional, or used to establish identity. The use of art as an integral part of the structure and function
of building is encouraged, e.g., the interpretation of light fixtures, benches, hardware, doors, surface
finishes, walkways, gates, and other features with the artwork or as a part of the artwork, although
only some of these elements would occur in the public right-of-way.
The criteria for review of encroachment or street use review artwork submissions are as follows:
a. Constructability of proposed artwork. No artwork shall impair disabled accessibility and
barrier -free design requirements.
b. Artist's credentials and recognition.
c. Durability and craftsmanship in fabrication and production quality. Quality of the work is a
high priority.
d. Due consideration shall be given to the structural and surface soundness of artworks and to
their permanence, including ability to withstand age, theft, vandalism, weathering, and
maintenance and possible related repair costs. Careful consideration shall be given to the
materials used and the appropriateness of those materials for the conditions of the site.
e. Coordination of the artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -
oriented character of the downtown area is encouraged.
f. Maintenance/conservation plan.
g. Relationship to other existing artwork in vicinity.
h. No Commercial Content. Artwork shall not be used as signage (see definition of signage).
C. Issuance by the Development Services Director or City Engineer. The development services director,
city engineer or their respective designee may administratively, without hearing, approve a street use or
encroachment permit if:
1. The proposed use shall not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic, including but not limited to
the following requirements:
a. No portion of the public right-of-way designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking
shall be permanently occupied, except to the extent allowed under ECDC 18.70.30.C.6.
b. Requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to all provisions relating to
disabled accessibility and barrier -free design requirements shall be met;
c. Any mobile vending units shall be properly licensed pursuant to Chapter 4.12 ECC;
d. Permit application fees have been paid (see ECDC 18.70.050);
e. A "clear zone" must be maintained on public sidewalks or walkways. A clear zone refers to an
area seven feet in height and five feet in width providing a level, safe walking surface along the
public sidewalk. Clear zone on sidewalks shall not include any curbing, planting strips or ramps.
For tables and chairs placed in the public right-of-way, the clear zone can be reduced to four feet
in width in front of obstacles (trees, street lights, sign posts, etc.);
Packet Pg. 358
9.3.b
f. All temporary objects shall be removed from the right-of-way on 24 hours' notice to
accommodate public events. Temporary objects are subject to removal in the event of an
emergency; and
g. All temporary objects, excluding approved awnings, wall signs, and permitted streateries, rhat
project more than 36 inches into the right-of-way shall be removed each day at the close of
business.
2. Exclusive Sidewalk Dining. In an effort to enhance street life of the city and serve both an
economic development purpose as well as enhance the livability of the city's urban core, exclusive
sidewalk dining shall be allowed pursuant to ECDC 17.70.040.
a. For purposes of this section the following terms are defined as:
i. "Exclusive sidewalk dining" shall refer to a properly zoned and licensed food or beverage
service establishment that uses the public right-of-way to serve only its customers at the
exclusion of the general public.
ii. "Barrier" shall refer to any temporary object or objects (e.g., stanchion, rope, , markers)
used to establish an exclusive bistro and outdoor dining area. Barriers shall be approved by
the city engineer.
b. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate
compensation for the exclusive use of the public right-of-way and applicant fees pursuant to
ECDC 18.70.050 have been paid.
c. All barriers, with the exception of markers and marking, shall be removed each day from the
right-of-way at the close of business.
d. The design and use shall comply with all requirements of state law, city ordinance and city
policy including but not limited to:
i. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) and Snohomish County health
division (SCHD). When applicable, the business shall provide a written approval from the
WSLCB and/or SCHD for use of public rights -of -way;
ii. ECDC 17.70.040, Exclusive sidewalk dining; and
iii. All litter and nuisance regulations, including but not limited to RCW 70.93.060 and
Chapter 6.40 ECC.
3. The design board has reviewed and approved any proposal which includes a request to construct,
erect or maintain an awning, building, sign or any building or structure, except as otherwise allowed in
ECDC 18.70.030.C;
4. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and
5. The proposal (if for an encroachment permit) either benefits the public interest, safety or
convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city street, reduces pedestrian hazards) or is an accessory
structure such as a fence normally associated with residential use of the property and fully complies
with the requirements of subsections (13)(1) through (3) of this section.
6. Streateries. Streatery means a type of parklet located within the public right of way, typically in a
vehicle parking space, that has been designed to allow for food and beverage services. To provide greater
opportunities for outdoor dining and beverage service, streateries may be permitted, subject to the
following requirements:
E
Packet Pg. 359
9.3.b
a. A streatery may be permitted as a type of street use in the parking lane of any public street on a
block where retail or restaurant use is located.
b. The business applying for the streatery is herein after referred to as the Permittee.
c. Streateries must meet applicable city and state statutes, including for fire, electrical, and building
safety, as well as for liquor service and other applicable agency requirements.
d. Streateries must be operated in a manner that complies with orders from the state health
department or governor related to coronavirus protection and with health district standards for
food and beverage service or with this chapter, whichever is stricter.
e. A complete street use permit application for a streatery shall be submitted to the city on a form
provided by the development services department. City review of any streatery application will be
completed in a timely manner and include opportunity for review by engineering, building, and
fire staff. A street use permit for the streatery may be issued with any conditions as necessary.
Field inspection will follow.
f. Freserv,jed
g. Timin and eExpiration and termination.
i. T4+L-A streatery shall be pei:miaed for- a period of no more than one yeaf, provided tha
the —permit may be extended in t-kfee--teup to six-month increments-, PROVIDED THAT
it a final inspection for code compliance prior to the permit extension AND THAT
no streatery may continue to operate or hold space in the right -of -wad beyond the sunset
date in subsection 6.p, below, regardless of the expiration date set forth on the permit.
ii. If the streatery has been cited with more than three violations of the city code within a
12-month period, its permit may be terminated
iii. After the streatery has begun operating or within 30 days of street use permit approval,
whichever is first, if the streatery is not used by the applicant for at least 15 days of any
30-day period, the City may ewe -terminate the permit in order to avoid leaving the
parking space unavailable for use. A notice of potential e*pifa4ion-termination shall be
provided by the City to the permittee at least ten days in advance of any
termination taking effect.
h. Number of allowed streateries. In the BD zone, after the first 20 streateries have been approved,
no more streatery permits shall be accepted by the City unless the permit is to replace an existing
streatery or this section is amended to allow additional streateries. A business is allowed to have
no more than one streatery permit.
i. Location.
i. A streatery must be located fully or partially adjacent to the business that it serves,
provided that if the business is not adjacent to one or more suitable parking spaces,
another business or property owner may give its written concurrence for the parking
space in front of it to be used for a streatery.
ii. All streatery use shall be entirely within the approved space(s) and shall not extend into
the travel lane of the public right-of-way.
iii. Streateries shall not be located in ADA parking stalls, in front of fire hydrants or bus
stops, or over the top of city storm catch basins.
iv. The maximum length of a streatery is two vehicle parking spaces. For corner locations,
the two spaces may be comprised of one parking space on each of the adjacent
intersecting streets.
V. No more than two streateries shall be located next to each other.
vi. Where only one parking space exists between two streateries on a block face, each of the
two streateries must be set back at least one foot from the intervening parking space.
j. Other site requirements.
10
Packet Pg. 360
9.3.b
i. A streatery must be located on an ADA-accessible raised platform that is flush with the
sidewalk and has no more than a'h- inch horizontal gap between the sidewalk and
platform. The platform must be ADA-accessible from the public sidewalk and, upon
entering the streatery, a wheelchair -user must be able to access at least one seat at a table
on the platform. Exception: A streatery may be allowed without a platform if the
business has other open-air dining that is ADA- compliant and available for customer
use.
ii. Each streatery must be protected at its end(s) from any adjacent vehicle parking space by
a water -filled jersey barrier, substantial planter at least 30 inches high, or other approved
barrier. The preferred color for a jersey barrier is white. Each barrier must include
adequate lighting or reflective markings, as approved by the city engineer, for night-time
visibility to drivers.
iii. Screening shall be located on the streatery side that is adjacent to and parallel with the
traffic lane. Such screening shall be at least 30 inches high and primarily consist of: (a)
lattice, picket, or solid fencing; (b) fabric or membrane material; or (c) containerized
plantings where the container is at least 30 inches in height. Above 36 inches in height,
any screening from the traffic lane will have views into and out of the streatery. An
applicant may propose a different material that provides both external views and a sense
of separation, subject to approval by the building official. Reflecting markings or
lighting, as approved by the city engineer, are required along the traffic side for night-
time visibility to drivers.
iv. All tents, canopies, fabric screens, and umbrellas are subject to approval by the building
official for any structural requirements and by the fire marshal for flame-retardance.
Tents and canopies must be fully open to the air on at least one side. If the open side is
less than 8 linear feet, a second side must have ventilation.
V. Tents, canopies, awnings, fabric screens, and umbrellas that are documented as being
purchased by the applicant prior to January 1, 2021, may be of any color. Otherwise, the
color of said items shall be primarily yellow, white, or red, or any combination of those
colors. Material that is transparent may also be acceptable.
vi. Fuel -burning heaters and open flames, such as candles, torches and fire pits, are not
allowed within 3 feet of any fabric (including tents and canopies) unless approved by the
fire marshal.
k. Signage. A streatery shall have no more than one sign. The allowed sign does not need a separate
permit but must be no more than eighteen inches in length and eight inches in height and must not
be internally lit nor have components that wave or otherwise appear to move. The sign shall not be
placed on the longest side of the streatery facing traffic and shall not be attached to the ground. It
may be attached to or part of a streatery component but cannot interfere with traffic or sight
visibility.
1. Maintenance. The permittee is responsible for maintenance of all streatery components, including
surface and furniture cleaning and keeping the area underneath and adjacent to the streatery free of
obstruction so that stormwater can flow freely at the curb.
m. Insurance. Insurance is required, per ECDC 18.70.030.G.
n. Installation and removal. The permittee is responsible for providing and installing all components
of the streatery and for removing the components when the permit has expired. The City may also
remove or require removal of the streatery as needed to deal with emergency conditions or
infrastructure repair.
o. City staff may provide additional details or guidance for applicants to implement this section,
consistent with direction from the city engineer and the development services director or their
respective designees.
p. This subsection C.6 shall sunset on A ri13-30, 201QQ22, ._� �� a�+�
11
Packet Pg. 361
9.3.b
D. Bay Windows, Decks, and Related Architectural Features. In an effort to allow for more creative
designs and a better overall appearance in the downtown area, bay windows, decks, and related
architectural features may encroach into the public right-of-way within the central business district or any
other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required, subject to the following requirements:
1. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate compensation
has been paid;
2. The encroachment shall not occur over alleys;
3. The building encroachment shall not project more than two feet (24 inches) into the right-of-way;
4. The encroachment shall not exceed 30 percent of the length of the facade on any one side of the
building;
5. The encroachment shall provide for a minimum clearance height of eight feet over any pedestrian
right-of-way and a minimum clearance height of 11 feet over any vehicular right-of-way, whichever is
greater;
6. The encroachment shall be approved by the architectural design board as contributing to a
modulated facade design which enhances the variation and appearance to the public of the overall
building design and public streetscape.
E. Appeal. The decision of the development services director, city engineer, or their respective designees
may be appealed to the hearing examiner as a Type II proceeding under the procedures set forth in Chapter
20.06 ECDC; provided, however, that the establishment of compensation for use of the public right-of-way
is a legislative decision of the city council and is not subject to judicial review.
F. Awnings and Canopies. Consistent with ECDC 22.43.040, awnings and canopies, whether architectural
or temporary, excluding those permitted under ECDC 18.70.030.C.6, may encroach into the public right of
way within the central business district or any other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required,
subject to the following:
1. The awning or canopy shall provide a minimum clearance height of 8 feet above the walking
surface, not to exceed 15 feet at its highest point.
2. Awning and canopy projection over the right of way shall be determined as follows, provided
that no awning or canopy shall project within two feet of the street curb (measured from the
back of curb):
Sidewalk Width Minimum Projection
Less than 8 feet 5 feet
8 feet or greater 6 feet
3. Awning and canopies shall not be constructed at a location or in a manner that will obstruct,
obsure, or interfere with any streetlight, flower pole, utility pole or appurtenance, street tree,
or any transportation -related sign, signal, or traffic control device.
4. All awning and canopy designs shall meet the above criteria, unless otherwise approved by
the city engineer.
G. Insurance Requirement. When the application is for use or encroachment onto a public right-of-way
including but not limited to streets, roads, alleys, trails, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian easements, and
any other easement intended for the use of the public, the applicant who operates a business or commercial
operation shall be required to provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of
insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be
primary as to any other policy of insurance. The policy must contain the additional insured statement,
coverage amounts and cancellation notification indicated on the sample insurance form provided by the
city. In addition, a business and commercial applicant as well as all residential or nonprofit applicants shall
sign a covenant to hold harmless and indemnify the city which will be recorded and run with the land in a
form approved by the city attorney.
12
Packet Pg. 362
9.3.b
H. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the base or ground support for any sign to be located upon
or attached to the ground within the public right-of-way.
18.70.040 Revocation.
A. Except as provided below, all permits approved under this chapter shall be temporary, shall vest no
permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the city upon
30 days' notice, or without notice in the event any such use or occupation shall become dangerous; any
structure or obstruction so permitted shall become insecure or unsafe; shall become a public nuisance; or
shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The
determination by the city engineer that a structure is dangerous, insecure, unsafe, a nuisance or has not been
constructed, used or maintained in accord with this chapter shall be conclusive.
B. Permits shall also be revoked if:
1. Following written notice of the lapse of an insurance policy required to be maintained by ECDC
18.70.030(F), the permittee fails to supply a valid certificate of insurance; or
2. Following written notice of the lapse of an annual application fee, renewal fee, or fees for the
exclusive use of the right-of-way by ECDC 18.70.050(B), the permittee fails to bring fees/account
current.
C.. If any such structure, obstruction, use or occupancy is not discontinued on notice to do so by the city
engineer and within the time period designated, the city engineer may remove any structure or obstruction,
or make such repairs upon the structure or obstruction as may be necessary to render the same secure and
safe, at the expense of the permittee, or his successor, and such expense may be recorded as a lien and
otherwise collected in the manner provided by law.
18.70.050 Fees.
A. Application fees for street use or encroachment permits are those established by the city council by
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. Application fees shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of any
permit.
B. Fees for the exclusive use of the public right-of-way are those established by the city council by
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. The fee €e--to extend a
streatery permit through April 30, 2022 shall be
on the first of eaemen. ha lump sum payment of $4,000 due on December 31, 2021, PROVIDED THAT
streatery operators not wishing to pay the permit extension fee shall remove the
streatery from the right-of-way no later than the Jut4tt2Eihe fneath after- the last m nt f r «' �' +'
street .i. ,.* teasie .mit fee was paid11:59 pm on January 15, 2022. The fee collected shall be used to
rent parking spaces that will be made available to the public.
C. There shall be no judicial appeal from a determination of the compensation to be paid for the use of
public right-of-way.
13
Packet Pg. 363
9.3.c
ORDINANCE NO.4209
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT
PERMITS," TO ALLOW "STREATERIES" FOR DINING IN
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY NECESSITATING IMMEDIATE ADOPTION
AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDINANCE
WHREAS, COVID-19 has created significant impacts to people's health and well-being,
which includes not only immediate physical health, but economic health; and
WHEREAS, Washington's Governor has been proactive in trying to responsibly address
coronavirus issues and some of his actions have included orders to close or partially close
businesses where COVID-19 transmission has the most risk; and
WHEREAS, in Edmonds, food and beverage services, such as restaurants, have been
especially impacted by full and partial closures; and
WHEREAS, COVID-related restrictions on restaurants and similar businesses have limited
or prohibited indoor dining during much of the year; and
WHEREAS, even without a state order, many people that want to eat at a restaurant would
prefer to do so in an outdoor environment, rather than indoors; and
WHEREAS, in August 2020, the City issued a special event permit to allow outdoor dining
in designated vehicle parking spaces within the public right-of-way until October 11, 2020, and
said permit was extended until November 8, 2020, and then again, until December 31, 2020 or the
effective date of a Council -adopted ordinance for streateries, whichever comes sooner; and
WHEREAS, City staff has worked to develop amendments to the Edmonds Community
Development Code that would allow outdoor dining in designated parking spaces in the public
right-of-way (i.e., "streateries") through an individual permitting process and more specific
standards; and
1
Packet Pg. 364
9.3.c
WHEREAS, the concepts for amending the code to allow streateries were presented in a
November 12, 2020 meeting of the City Council's Public Safety, Planning, and Personnel
Committee and subsequently presented in a November 24, 2020 meeting of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the concepts for streateries have been incorporated into a set of amendments
to Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code; and
WHEREAS, a sunset clause on the effectiveness of these provisions has been included in
the code amendments because these provisions are not currently intended to be permanent, but
rather, are primarily intended to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1, Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Street
Use and Encroachment Permits," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown
in underline; deleted text is shown in strike thfough).
Section 2. Emergency Declaration. The city council hereby declares that an emergency
exists necessitating that this ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote
plus one of the whole membership of the council (RCW 35A.12.130), and that the same is not
subject to a referendum. Without an immediate adoption of this interim zoning ordinance,
streateries would need to continue to operate under a special event permit, but that permit was
supposed to expire on December 31, 2020. Any uncertainty in the ability of the city's restaurants
to continue offering streatery-dining could further jeopardize an already struggling restaurant
industry. Therefore, this ordinance should be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the
public health, safety and welfare by staving off restaurant failures and creating program so that
Edmonds citizens will have safer places to dine for the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
2
Packet Pg. 365
9.3.c
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect
immediately upon passage, as set forth in Section 2, as long as it is approved by a majority plus
one of the entire membership of the council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is not adopted
by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the council, then the language declaring an
emergency shall be disregarded, in which case, this ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
M OR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
C CLERK, SCOT ASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY 2t�� -NOW
JEFF TARAD Y
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: December 11, 2020
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: December 15, 2020
PUBLISHED: December 18, 2020
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 23, 2020
ORDINANCE NO. 4209
3
Packet Pg. 366
9.3.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4209
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 15th day of December, 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 4209. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.70 ECDC,
ENTITLED "STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT
PERMITS," TO ALLOW "STREATERIES" FOR DINING
IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY NECESSITATING IMMEDIATE
ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS
ORDINANCE
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 15th day of December, 2020.
CI ERK, SCOTT PAS Y
0
Packet Pg. 367
9.3.c
Exhibit A
Chapter 18.70
STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
Sections:
18.70.000
Permits required.
18.70.010
Exemptions.
18.70.020
Applications.
18.70.030
Review.
18.70.040
Revocation.
18.70.050
Fees.
18.70.000 Permits required.
No person shall use or encroach upon any public place without obtaining a permit from the development
services director or city engineer.
A. Encroachment Permit. An encroachment permit is required to encroach upon any portion of city public
space, right-of-way or easement area with permanent structures. "To encroach" means to construct, erect or
maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, easement, roadway, parking strip and/or
sidewalk, including the airspace above them, any structures permanent in nature, including but not limited
to building extension, marquee, fence, retaining wall, artwork, or any other building or structure.
B. Street Use Permit. A street use permit is required to use any portion of public space or city right-of-way
for objects which are temporary in nature.
1. To "use" means to place or maintain in, over or under any public place, right-of-way, roadway,
parking strip and/or sidewalk, including the air space above them, any temporary or movable object.
2. "Temporary in nature," in reference to street use permits, means not having or requiring permanent
attachment to the ground, or involving structures which have no required permanent attachment to the
ground.
3. "Temporary object' for the purposes of this chapter refers to all objects placed in the right-of-way
that are temporary in nature including but not limited to chairs, tables, planters, sandwich boards, c
benches, stanchions,1Slatforms, rope, and fencing. N
v
L
None of the above definitions shall be interpreted to prohibit the parking of a properly licensed vehicle O
within the parking strip adjacent to their property line of sight, and street plantings, except as otherwise
provided in ECOC 18.70.030:C.6.
E
t
18.70.020 Applications.
Applications for street use or encroachment permits shall contain, in addition to the information required Q
under any other applicable city code, the following information
A. Street Use Permit.
1. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Certificate of insurance.
4. Complete street use or streatery hermit application.
Packet Pg. 368
9.3.c
B. Encroachment Permit.
1. Critical areas determination, when applicable.
2. Complete application requirements for Edmonds arts commission, when applicable.
3. Architectural design board approval, when applicable.
4. Partial site plan, to be recorded with Snohomish County, clearly showing proposed encroachment,
private property lines, all existing structures and driveways, easements and/or public property
(developed or undeveloped).
5. Legal description, including copies of all recorded easements on the property.
6. Elevation view or side view of the proposed encroachment.
7. Ownership. Evidence showing the applicant to be the agent record owner of the property
immediately adjoining the public place or right-of-way. An application to place artwork in the public
right-of-way will be exempt from this requirement.
8. Certificate of insurance.
9. Complete encroachment permit application.
10. Complete encroachment agreement, to be recorded with Snohomish County.
C. Such other information as the city engineer or designee of the development services director shall
require.
D. The encroachment agreement shall require prompt removal of the encroachment by the applicant at
his/her/its expense upon reasonable demand by the city engineer and be legally adequate for recording in
the land records of Snohomish County and the chain of title of the applicant's property. Such encroachment
agreements may be executed as acknowledged on behalf of the city by the city engineer and recorded by
the city clerk following approval as to form by the city attorney.
18.70.030 Review. O
A. Architectural Design Board. Any application for a permit to construct, erect or maintain an awning, a)
marquee, sign or any structure in a public place except as otherwise allowed in ECDC 18.70.030.0 may N
be referred by the development services director or his/her designee to the architectural design board. If
referred to the board, the board shall review the plans and specifications as they relate to Chapter 20.10 O
ECDC. r
c
m
Applications for mobile street vending units shall be reviewed in accordance with ECC 4.12.055 by the E
architectural design board.
R
B. Edmonds Arts Commission. Applications for an encroachment permit or a street use permit to install art Q
in the public right-of-way shall be subject to the review and recommendation of the Edmonds arts
commission. No art shall be permitted in the public right-of-way except as expressly permitted herein.
Artwork that is reviewed under an encroachment permit shall be exempt of the requirements of ECDC
18.70.020(B)(5), (6), (7) and (10).
1. The terms "art" or "artwork" as used in this section shall refer only to a work of visual art existing
in a single copy or in multiple copies of 200 or fewer that are consecutively numbered by the author
and bear the signature or other identifying mark of the author.
2. The terms "art" or artwork" do not include:
Packet Pg. 369
9.3.c
a. Any poster, map, globe, chart, technical drawing, diagram, model, applied art, motion picture
or other audiovisual work, book, magazine, newspaper, periodical, database, electronic
information service, electronic publication, or similar publication;
b. Any merchandising item or advertising, promotional, descriptive, covering, or packaging
material or container;
c. Architectural details such as masonry, ironwork, or other building fixtures or materials;
d. Any portion or part of any item described in subsection (A), (B) or (C) of this section;
e. Any work not subject to copyright protection under the Visual Artists Rights Act, as codified
under federal copyright law, U.S.C. Title 17, as the same exists or is hereafter amended.
3. An encroachment permit or street use permit requires determination of public benefit. The Edmonds
arts commission (EAC) is mandated in Chapter 10.20 ECC to advise the city on matters pertaining to
art. When the proposed encroachment or street use is art, EAC will review and make written
recommendations to the community services director and city engineer for use and consideration in
permit issuance. (See subsection (C) of this section.)
4. The public right-of-way is a traditional forum for public expression. By this permit program the city
acknowledges that it is approving uses in a limited public forum. Art, like other exercises of First
Amendment rights, may be limited by reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. In this case,
these criteria will be utilized to protect the safety of the public who use the right-of-way for pedestrian
or vehicular traffic and to ensure that the city provides for accessibility for the disabled. No
recommendation or denial shall be based upon the content or message expressed by an artist or in a
work of art as long as there is no commercial content. Applicants are encouraged to coordinate their
artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -oriented character of the
downtown area.
5. Specific submission requirements for EAC review include, but are not limited to:
a. Site plan sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum one -quarter -inch scale rendering of the art concept or art component, including at
least one elevation showing the art in context or comparable photographs of actual artwork in
context;
c. Material/color samples;
d. Model (optional);
e. Written proposal: seven copies of a written proposal in eight and one-half by 11-inch format to
include:
i. A description and summary of a final design proposal for the artwork for the proposed
prof ect;
ii. Detailed maintenance requirements;
iii. Schedule for development, fabrication, and completion;
iv. Artists' resume/background;
v. Evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or designee.
For proposal to be reviewed at next scheduled EAC meeting, a complete submission of all
requirements must be received a minimum of 10 days prior to the date of the meeting.
7
a)
CO
N
E
L
O
c
m
E
t
U
M
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 370
9.3.c
Additional requirements may be requested based on staff input or information sought by EAC
members.
6. Review Criteria. Art in public places may be art standing alone, modifiers or definers of space,
functional, or used to establish identity. The use of art as an integral part of the structure and function
of building is encouraged, e.g., the interpretation of light fixtures, benches, hardware, doors, surface
finishes, walkways, gates, and other features with the artwork or as a part of the artwork, although
only some of these elements would occur in the public right-of-way.
The criteria for review of encroachment or street use review artwork submissions are as follows:
a. Constructability of proposed artwork. No artwork shall impair disabled accessibility and
barrier -free design requirements.
b. Artist's credentials and recognition.
c. Durability and craftsmanship in fabrication and production quality. Quality of the work is a
high priority.
d. Due consideration shall be given to the structural and surface soundness of artworks and to
their permanence, including ability to withstand age, theft, vandalism, weathering, and
maintenance and possible related repair costs. Careful consideration shall be given to the
materials used and the appropriateness of those materials for the conditions of the site.
e. Coordination of the artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -
oriented character of the downtown area is encouraged.
f. Maintenance/conservation plan.
g. Relationship to other existing artwork in vicinity,
h. No Commercial Content. Artwork shall not be used as signage (see definition of signage).
C. Issuance by the Development Services Director or City Engineer. The development services director, E
city engineer or their respective designee may administratively, without hearing, approve a street use or 13
encroachment permit if.
a)
1. The proposed use shall not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic, including but not limited to N
the following requirements:
L
O
a. No portion of the public right-of-way designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking
shall be permanently occupied, except to the extent allowed under ECDC 18.70.30.C.6. y
E
b. Requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to all provisions relating to
disabled accessibility and barrier -free design requirements shall be met;
r
Q
c. Any mobile vending units shall be properly licensed pursuant to Chapter 4.12 ECC;
d. Permit application fees have been paid (see ECDC 18.70.050);
e. A "clear zone" must be maintained on public sidewalks or walkways. A clear zone refers to an
area seven feet in height and five feet in width providing a level, safe walking surface along the
public sidewalk. Clear zone on sidewalks shall not include any curbing, planting strips or ramps.
For tables and chairs placed in the public right-of-way, the clear zone can be reduced to four feet
in width in front of obstacles (trees, street lights, sign posts, etc.);
Packet Pg. 371
9.3.c
f. All temporary objects shall be removed from the right-of-way on 24 hours' notice to
accommodate public events. Temporary objects are subject to removal in the event of an
emergency; and
g. All temporary objects, excluding approved awnings, -and wall signs, and permitted streateries,
rhat project more than 36 inches into the right-of-way shall be removed each day at the close of
business.
2. Exclusive Hkke and Owd idewalk Dining. In an effort to enhance street life of the city and
serve both an economic development purpose as well as enhance the livability of the city's urban core
exclusive bimf a and owdeeFsidewalk dining shall be allowed pursuant to ECDC 17.70.040.
a. For purposes of this section the following terms are defined as:
i. "Exclusive-hisir$and-stH-d-eerrsidewalk dining" shall refer to a properly zoned and licensed
food or beverage service establishment that uses the public right-of-way to serve only its
customers at the exclusion of the general public. 0
r
ii. "Barrier" shall refer to any temporary object or objects (e.g., stanchion, rope, fencing, 3
a
players, markers) used to establish an exclusive bistro and outdoor dining area. Barriers shall
tx
be approved by the city engineer. N
a�
b. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate +;
compensation for the exclusive use of the public right-of-way and applicant fees pursuant to M
a�
ECDC 18.70.050 have been paid.
CO
c. All barriers with the exce lion of markers and marking- shall be removed each day from the c
right-of-way at the close of business.
a�
d. The design and use shall comply with all requirements of state law, city ordinance and city E
policy including but not limited to: y
U
c
i. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis C-c Board (WSLCB) and Snohomish County
c
health division (SCHD). When applicable, the business shall provide a written approval from
the WSLCB and/or SCHD for use of public rights -of -way; O
ii. ECDC 17.70.040, Exclusive sidewalk dining; and c
N
iii. All litter and nuisance regulations, including but not limited to RCW 70.93.060 and '000
Chapter 6.40 ECC. O
r
3. The design board has reviewed and approved any proposal which includes a request to construct,
erect or maintain an awning, building, sign or any building or structure except as otherwise allowed in E
ECDC 18.70.030.C; U
2
r
4. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and Q
5. The proposal (if for an encroachment permit) either benefits the public interest, safety or
convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city street, reduces pedestrian hazards) or is an accessory
structure such as a fence normally associated with residential use of the property and fully complies
with the requirements of subsections (13)(1) through (3) of this section.
6. Streateries. Streatery means a t ie of parklet located within the public right oFway, typically in a
vehicle parking space that has been designed to allow for food and bcverage services. To row vide greater
o pportunities for outdoor d i n i ng and beve ra =e service streater ies ma y be p ermined, subject to the
following requirements:
E
Packet Pg. 372
9.3.c
a. A streatery may be permitted as a type of street use in [he Barking lane of any public street on a
block where retail or restaurant use is located.
b. The business applying for the streatery is herein after referred to as the Permittee.
e. Streateries must meet applicable city and state statutes including for fire electrical and buildin
safety, as well as for liquor service and other applicable agency requirements.
d. Streateries must be ❑ erated in a manner that complies with orders from the state health
department or governor related to coronavinis protection and with health district standards for
food and beverage service or with this chapter, whichever is stricter.
e. A com lele street use p ermit app Iication for a strea tcEy shall be submitted to the c i ty on a form
rovided by the development services d artment. City review of any streatery application will be
corn pleEed in a timely manncr and include opportunity for review by engineering, huiIding and
fire staff. _ A_street use pRennit for the streatery may be issued with any conditions as necessary.
Field inspection will follow.
C Any streatery in existence on December 1, 2020 under a special event permit may continue such
use until J anu ary 17 2021 rovided that a sire el use 12ermit for the s(rea(cry is a lied for b
January 1 1.2021_and the City determines that the streatery meets or can meet the requirements of
this section and issues a permit for it, with any conditions.
g. Timing and expiration,
J. The streatery shall be penniIted for a period of no more than one year, provided that the
tpennit may be extended in three- to six-month increments.
ii. 1 f the streatery has been cited with more than three violations of the city code within a
12-month period, its permit inay be expired without allowance for extension.
iii. After the streatery has begun operating or within 30_ days of street use perniitapproval,
whichever is first,_if Ili e_streatery is not used by the applicant for at least 15 days of any
30-da eriod the City in ay cx pire the permit in order to avoid leavin l the 12arkin 9 Mace
unavailable for use. A notice of potential expiration shall be provided by the City to the
permittee at least ten days in advance of any expiration taking effect.
h. Number of allowed streateries. In the BD zone, after the first 20 Streateries have, been approved,
no more streateryJperm iIs shall be accepted by the City unless the permit is to replace an existing
streptery or this section is amended to allow additional streateries. A business is allowed to have
no more than one slrcaterypermit.
i. Location.
i. A streatery must be located fully or partially adjacent to the business that it serves
rovided that if the business is not adjacent to one or more suitable parkin r s p aces.
another business or property owner may give_ its written concurrence for theparking
space in front of it to be used for a streatery.
ii. All streatery use shall be entirely within the appproved sQace(s) and shall not extend into
the travel lane of the public right -of --way.
iii. Streateries shall not be located in ADA parking stalls. in front of fire hydrants or bus
stops, or over the top of cif. storm catch basins.
iv. The maximunt length of a streatery is two vehicle parking spaces. For confer locali.ons,
the two spaces may be comprised of one parking space on each of the adjacent
intcrsecting streets.
v. No more than two streateries shall be located next to each other.
vi, Where only one parking space exists between two streateries on a block face, each o#'the
two streateries must be set back at least one foot from the intervening parking space.
i. Other_site_ re_guireinents.
A streatery must be located on an ADA-accessible raised platform that is flush with the
sidewalk and has no more than a''/z- inch horizontal gap between the sidewalk and
latform. The platform must be ADA-accessible from (lie public sidewalk and upon
entering t_he streatery, a wheelchair -user must be able to access at least one seat at a table
on the platform. Exception: A streatery may be allowed without a platform if the
10
r
Q
Packet Pg. 373
9.3.c
business has other open-air dining that is ADA- com liant and available for customer
use.
ii. Each streatery must be protected at its endfsl from any adjacent vehicle narking apace by
a water -filled ic rsey barrier substantial p Ianter at least 30 inches hi & h or other approved
barrier. The preferred color for a jersey barrier is white. Each barrier trust include
adequate lijxhtinL, or reffcetive markings. as a2l2roved by the cit en mecr, for night-time
visibility to drivers.
iiL Screening shall be located on the strcatery side that is adjacent to and parallel with the
traffic lane. Such screening shall be at least 30 inches high and primarily consist of: (a)
lattice icket or solid rencin b Fabric or membrane material• or c containerized
plantings_ where the container is at ]cast 30 inches in height. Above 36 inches in height,
any _screening _frorn the traffic lane will have views into and out of the streatery. An
applicant may propose a dilTerent naterial that 2royi des both external vic►vs and a sense
of separation, subject to approval by the building official. Reflecting markings or
y
li htin as approved U y the c i ty en ineer are reg uired aIon g the traffic side for ni all
0
0
time visibility to drivers.
iv. All tents, canopies, fabric screens, and umbrellas are subject to approval by the building
official for any structural requirements and by the fire marshal for flame-retardance.
Tents and canopies must be fully open to the air on at least one side. 1 f the open side is
w
less than 8 linear feet, a second side must have ventilation.
m
�L
V. Tents —canopies, awnings, fabric screens and umbrellas that are documented as being
purchased by the appIicant_prior to January 1, 2421, may be of anxcoIor. Dtherwise, the
i
color of said items shall be nrimarilxye]Iow. white, or red, or any combination of those
CO
colors. Material that is transparent may also be acceptable.
vs. fuel -burning heaters and open flames, such as candles, torches and Ft re pits, are not
C
allowed within 3 feet of any fabric (including Lents and canopies) unless approved by the
fire marshal.
E
k_ Signagg. A streatery shall have _no_more than one sign. The allowed sign does not need a separate
cc
permit but must be no more than eighteen inches in length and eight inches in heiipht and roust not
C
he internally lit nor have components that wave or otherwise ap2pear to move. The sign shall not be
c
placed on the longest side of the strcatery facing traffic and shall not be attached to the ground. It
may be attached to or part of a streatcry component but cannol interfere with traffic or sight
visibility.
a�
1. Maintenance. The pernittee is responsible for maintenance of all streatery components, including
v
surface and_ furniture cIeaning and kec12ing the area underneath and adjacent to t11e streatery free of
obstruction so that stormwater can flow freely at the curb.
0
m. Insurance. Insurance is required, per ECDC 18.70.030.G.
n. Installation and removal. The Pennittee is responsible for providing and installing al] components
m
of the streatery and for rentoying the components when the permit has expired. The City may also
E
retnove or re uire removal of the streate as needed to deal with ernerUncy conditions or
infrastructure repair.
Q
o. City staff may provide additional details or guidance for applicants to implement this section,
consistent with direction from the city engineer and the develol2nient services director or their
respective designees.
a-p_Tills_ sect ion Shall Sln7SCl on December 31, 2021, unless the effect Eve Hale is Changed by action of
the City Council.
D. Bay Windows, Decks, and Related Architectural Features. In an effort to allow for more creative
designs and a better overall appearance in the downtown area, bay windows, decks, and related
architectural features may encroach into the public right-of-way within the central business district or any
other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required, subject to the following requirements:
11
Packet Pg. 374
9.3.c
1. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate compensation
has been paid;
2. The encroachment shall not occur over alleys;
3. The building encroachment shall not project more than two feet (24 inches) into the right-of-way;
4. The encroachment shall not exceed 30 percent of the length of the facade on any one side of the
building;
5. The encroachment shall provide for a minimum clearance height of eight feet over any pedestrian
right-of-way and a minimum clearance height of 11 feet over any vehicular right-of-way, whichever is
greater;
6. The encroachment shall be approved by the architectural design board as contributing to a
modulated facade design which enhances the variation and appearance to the public of the overall
building design and public streetscape.
E. Appeal. The decision of the development services director, city engineer, or their respective designees a
may be appealed to the hearing examiner as a Type II proceeding under the procedures set forth in Chapter
20.06 ECDC; provided, however, that the establishment of compensation for use of the public right-of-way w
is a legislative decision of the city council and is not subject to judicial review.
L
F. Awnings and Canopies. Consistent with ECDC 22,43.040, awnings and canopies. whether architectural
or ternpnrary1excluding those perntitted under ECDC 18.70.030.C.6, may encroach into the public rigltl of
way_wiIhin the central business district or_nny other zone in which no setback from the lot line is required, CO
subject to the following: c
�a
1. The awning or cana shall rovide a minimum clearance hei =h[ of 8 Feet above the walkingm
surface, not to exceed_ 15 feet at its highest point.
2. Awning and canopy projection over the right of way shall be determined as follows, provided
that no awning or canopy shall Project within two feet of the street curb measured from the c
back of curb): c
Sidewalk Width Minimum_Proiection �
Less than 8 feet 5 feet _ O
8 feel or greater 6 feel
3. Awning and_canopies shall not be constructed at a locatign or in a manner that will obstruct N
obsure an or interfere with y streetlight, flower pole, utility pole or appurtenance, street tree, -'aa
or any transportation -related sign, signal, or traffic control device. O
4. All awn in and canopy desi gns shad meet the above criteria unless otherwise a pproved b
the city engineer.
EG. Insurance Requirement. When the application is for use or encroachment onto a public right-of-way t
including but not limited to streets, roads, alleys, trails, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian easements, and R
any other easement intended for the use of the public, the applicant who operates a business or commercial Q
operation shall be required to provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of
insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be
primary as to any other policy of insurance. The policy must contain the additional insured statement,
coverage amounts and cancellation notification indicated on the sample insurance form provided by the
city. In addition, a business and commercial applicant as well as all residential or nonprofit applicants shall
sign a covenant to hold harmless and indemnify the city which will be recorded and run with the land in a
form approved by the city attorney.
CH. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the base or ground support for any sign to be located
upon or attached to the ground within the public right-of-way.
12
Packet Pg. 375
9.3.c
18.70.040 Revocation.
A. Except as provided below, all permits approved under this chapter shall be temporary, shall vest no
permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the city upon
30 days' notice, or without notice in the event any such use or occupation shall become dangerous; any
structure or obstruction so permitted shall become insecure or unsafe; shall become a public nuisance; or
shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The
determination by the city engineer that a structure is dangerous, insecure, unsafe, a nuisance or has not been
constructed, used or maintained in accord with this chapter shall be conclusive.
B. Permits shall also be revoked if:
1. Following written notice of the lapse of an insurance policy required to be maintained by ECDC
18.70.030(F), the permittee fails to supply a valid certificate of insurance; or
2. Following written notice of the lapse of an annual application fee, renewal fee, or fees for the
exclusive use of the right-of-way by ECDC 18.70.050(B), the permittee fails to bring fees/account
current.
issued for- an;oil is,l
toff-t+ f- - ue-,; A- f@rini1 R)ran aKitiWc4-ut;&kfrc Owe— ay be rQvHb�o
ba.e.?c ) �r '„ s�: ��r� r.�a_i or a �tio o a r�i . rn ..�the will s.s,o
homer of the P "hall �i�f3ttrsec�fnr an�et�nsiclt�at4er� pro�ir#eci-fer �^i' l�eiinbursenwol
ibimnumsanm .-
.t . S(Neted ; ,i0l n 3{�-18r-ih%CiiiEQC�lfrBl fBaEl1r95 Shall be
[3"-rs. srrliE'�Ef�fi�S-FY�'�f@F-}�li�-k551'1P.:��. Tsi
u,..lr m..�:,,....., .. ,.. : [ no! revoke d by !he eit.. foF add :.:ona1 10 yea F Wr-F .....,,1.ieeA to !; ..L...Hal
Emotion a5 Eli
C. 0. if any such structure, obstruction, use or occupancy is not discontinued on notice to do so by the city
engineer and within the time period designated, the city engineer may remove any structure or obstruction,
or make such repairs upon the structure or obstruction as may be necessary to render the same secure and
safe, at the expense of the permittee, or his successor, and such expense may be recorded as a lien and
otherwise collected in the manner provided by law.
18.70.050 Fees.
A. Application fees for street use or encroachment permits are those established by the city council by O
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. Application fees shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of any a)
permit. c
N
B. Fees for the exclusive use of the public right -of --way are those established by the city council by 0
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. The fee Cor a sweater permit shall he the same as for a street
use omit rovided that a (cc hnoIo fee shaII not be charged for a streater .
m
C. There shall be no judicial appeal from a determination of the compensation to be paid for the use of M
public right -of --way. +a
r
Q
13
Packet Pg. 376
12.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/4/2022
Council Committee Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
The Council committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PSPP121421
FC121421
PPW121421
Packet Pg. 377
12.1.a
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
December 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas (Chair)
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson
CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human
Serv. Dir.
Leif Bjorback, Building Official
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Executive Assistant Job Description Revision
Ms. Feser explained the job description was last updated 7'/2 years ago. When doing performance
evaluations, there were discrepancies between the job description and expectations for the position.
The packet contains a redlined version with the proposed changes and a clean copy. Committee
members observed the clean version was not included in the packet and requested it be included when
this item goes to Council.
Discussion followed regarding previous revisions made to a part-time receptionist position and the
position remaining a bargaining unit position.
Action: Consent Agenda, including a clean version of the job description.
2. Building Division Job Description Revision
Mr. Bjorback explained the Council approved a non -represented position last spring and it was filled via
an in-house promotion. These revisions are necessary due to the need for an advanced level position
to handle the technical side of the permitting process so that it can function as a lead position rather
than a non -represented supervisory position. Enough changes were made to the job description to have
it recognized as a bargaining unit position rather than exempt.
Discussion followed regarding why the position was reverting back to represented rather than non -
represented, original intent of the non -represented position to assist with supervisory duties, assistance
the position can provide with permitting, and a similar pay grade for the bargaining unit position.
Action: Consent Agenda
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 5:11 p.m.
Packet Pg. 378
12.1.b
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
December 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Vivian Olson Dave Turley, Finance Director
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts, & Human
Serv. Dir.
Megan Menkveld, Assistant Finance Director
Scott Passev, Citv Clerk
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.
by Councilmember Buckshnis.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Marina Beach Park Renovation Project Grant Agreement
Ms. Feser explained this is a recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign two grant agreements
with the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) of the State of Washington related to Marina
Beach Park. The Marina Beach Park renovation was based on a master plan developed with a lot of
community engagement culminating in adoption of the plan by the City Council in 2015. She
reviewed:
Grant application timeline
o March 10-2020 — recommended by PPW Committee
o March 17, 2020 — authorized by Council via resolution
o June 2020 — grant submitted
■ July —technical review
■ September — presentation
0 2021 — successful awards in both grant programs ($500,000 each)
o Ranked #1 ALEA (Aquatic Land Enhancement Account)
o Funded in Local Parks category of WWRP program
Next step is Council authorizing the Mayor to enter contract, committing the City to the grants
and the project and providing additional funds for the project
o Project was submitted with a cost estimate of $5 million in 2020 dollars
o $1 million is provided by these grants
o $750,000 from REET 125
o Outstanding balance $3.25 million
■ Parks Department will work on other grants and funding sources such as Park Impact
Fees, REET funds, and other grant applications
Map of Marina Beach
o Graphic illustrating the existing City -owned marsh property and the connection between
the two parcels.
o Marina Beach Park project daylights a 1000 foot pipe connecting the marsh to Puget
Sound.
Edmonds Marsh and Unocal Property
o Graphic illustrates the parcels and ownership.
o City owns the bookend parcels and property between is owned by Chevron Services
(aka Unocal).
o Unocal site is currently being cleaned up and mitigated from the previous petroleum
product use on the site
N
N
U
U_
c
a�
E
U
2
a
Packet Pg. 379
12.1.b
12/14/21 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
o Opportunity to combine the properties to create a complete marsh followed by a
restoration project. Marina Beach is an important component
o The railroad installed a bridge in Marina Beach Park which is a fixed point to connect
the marsh water system
Discussion followed regarding concern the narrative does not indicate that some Councilmember had
reservations about authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreements and assurance it would come back
to the Council, concern that accepting the grants commits the City to spending another $4 million on
the Marina Beach project, concern much of the spending was not related to the ecosystem and was
not a short term spending priority, preference for this to come to full Council and not on the Consent
Agenda, concern with proceeding when the ownership of the Unocal property is unknown, the need to
change the Comprehensive Plan because the Marina Beach project is not in compliance, support for
a presentation to Council in 2022, nearshore estuary restorations a key component of the Governor's
directives, and concern with dividing the project between Marina Beach and a floodplain project.
Action: Presentation to full Council.
2. September 2021 Quarterly Financial Report
3. October 2021 Monthly Financial Report
Mr. Turley reviewed noteworthy items r
• REET is up $1.7 million from this point in time last year
• Real Persona/Property tax is up $98K from this point in time last year o
• EMS property tax is up $62K from this point in time last year c)
• Sales Tax is up $1.8 million from this point in time last year U
• Plan Checking Fees are up $163K from this point in time last year; Development Services o
revenues overall are up $186K from this point in time last year v
• Parks & Recreation program fees are up $322K from this point in time last year
• October of 2020 Engineering overhead was not recorded until Nov 202 which is the main
reason for the large difference between years. Oct 2020 Engineering overhead totaled
$185,680 v
U_
• Now at 83% of the year completed; all departments are within or under budget.
c
as
Discussed followed regarding investment strategies, differences in yields, inflation causing interest z
rates to increase, and debt service interest above budget. a
a
Action: Consent Agenda.
4. 2021 December Budget Amendment
Mr. Turley explained there are four requests; more detailed information is contained in the Council
packet. If approved, the budget amendment would increase forecast revenues by $8,773,456 and
would increase budgeted expenditures by $2,739,009. Two of the amendments represent required
transfers of budget authority from one fund to another, and two are to record the effects of the recent
bond sale. There is no new cash outflow as a result of these entries. He reviewed the proposed 2021
December Budget Amendment requests:
• Allocates the Council -approved ARPA funds spending to the funds where the expenses were
incurred.
Provides authority to transfer $535 to the Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund, in accordance with
the State of Washington's 1 % for Arts Program.
Records the effects of the advance refunding of the portion of the City's 2012 Bonds on behalf
of the Edmonds Public Facilities District.
Packet Pg. 380
12.1.b
12/14/21 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
• Records the effects of the bond sale to provide funds for Civic Field ($1,634,447) and for other
capital projects ($4.4 million).
Mr. Turley summarized all four decision packages are to record activity that has already occurred, all
four are mandatory entries, and none of them represent new spending. He responded to Council
questions regarding the amendments.
Action: Full Council at 12/14/21 meeting.
5. Replacement of Enterprise Resource Planning Software (Eden)
Ms. Menkveld reviewed:
Current state
o Eden (Tyler Technologies)
■ The existing ERP solution, Eden went live in 2001 (20 years old). It is now being
phased out by Tyler Technologies
o Affected departments
■ Admin Staff
■ Budget Staff
■ Utility Billing
■ Interfaced Software
■ Mayor and Council
o Considerations
■ Staff Needed
- Core team
- Advisory group(s)
■ Timing
■ Compliance & Transparency
- Budget transparency
- Better audit controls
- Eden cannot purge old data that should be destroy per Public Records law
■ Budget Impact
- 2022 budget amendment
- Or postpone to 2023 budget
- Potential use of ARPA funds
Project needs assessment steps
o Council Approval - Professional Services
o Council Approval - Procurement of Products
o RFP for Project Manager
o RFP for Software Product
o Product Selection
o Implementation
o Training
Planning Timeline Options
o Complete Implementation
■ Requires RFP and product selection
■ Requires 2022 budget amendment or postponement to 2023 budget
■ Implementation estimated at 12 months
o Phased Implementation
■ No RFP as there are no competing stand-alone budget products
■ Addresses immediate COVID-19 workplace concerns
■ Implementation of budget module estimated at 5 months
Project Needs Assessment: ARPA
o Justification for use of ARPA funds
N
N
U
U_
c
as
E
U
2
a
Packet Pg. 381
12/14/21 Finance Committee Minutes,
12.1.b
e4
o Other cities that have funded replacement with ARPA funds
Planning Timeline
o Option 1: Complete ERP Implementation
■ Q4 2021 — Q2 2023
o Option 2: Phased Implementation: Budget Module First
■ Q4 2021 — Q3 2023
Ms. Menkveld invited committee members to submit questions to her. Questions and discussion
followed regarding a suggestion to discuss the use of ARPA funds with the City Attorney, whether
there were any downsides to doing the budget -only module, cost of the system, the OpenGov
application, the project manager's duties and cost of that position, and timing of the replacement.
Action: Continued discussion at January Finance 11th Committee meeting
6. 2022 Budget Amendment
Councilmember Buckshnis explained citizens have raised questions and a lot of policy issues are
being researched. If the original timeline of approving the budget on November 23rd had been
maintained, there would have been seven elected officials to vote on the budget. MSRC has been
contacted and she and Councilmember K. Johnson have talked to the City Attorney. The original
intent was to repeal the budget; however, that was very cumbersome so the best and simplest course
of action would be budget amendments which will be scheduled for the first meeting in January.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed concerns with tapping into unrestricted reserves, anticipating if
sufficient discussion and vetting had occurred on November 23rd, some of the spending from the $2.2
million in unrestricted reserves could have been removed and handled either via budget amendments
in 2022 or in future years' budget when there was more information available. The Fund Balance
Policy states the Finance Committee should discuss when the City utilizes unrestricted reserves. The
amendments that will be proposed are contained in the packet.
Action: Schedule for first regular Council meeting in January 2022.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 6:29 p.m.
Packet Pg. 382
12.1.c
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
December 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Laura Johnson Rob English, Acting Public Works Director
Councilmember Will Chen Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Serv.
Dir.
Dave Turley, Finance Director
Pamela Randolph, WWTP Supervisor
Scott Passey, City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by
Councilmember L. Johnson.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Contract with HASA Inc for Sodium Hypochlorite for the WWTP
Ms. Randolph relayed the City goes out to bid every couple of years for treatment plant chemicals. This
year was extremely unique as there have been astronomical price increases in the product that the
WWTP uses. Two competitive bids were received for hypochlorite from HASA and Jones. Jones' bid
was thrown out because it stated the cost would be increased needed. The HASA bid listed an
incremental increase, stated HASA would not pass on any unrealized cost increases, and included a
cap. Staff recommends proceeding with the HASA agreement for two years with a potential third year
extension if they can guarantee the price. This is an extremely competitive price and HASA has a higher
quality product.
Councilmember Chen thanked Ms. Randolph for the tour of the WWTP. Questions and discussion
followed regarding the bid process, the City's location and storage space that limits the companies that
submit bids, reason the product price fluctuates, chemical performance, supply maintained on site, and
the price increase.
Action: 12/14/21 Consent Agenda
2. Presentation of a Professional Services Agreement for the Design of the Phase 13
Waterline Replacement Project
Mr. English explained an RFQ was issued in October 2021 to hire a consultant to provide design
engineering services for Phases 13 and 14 Waterline Replacement Projects for 2022 and 2023. Four
firms responded and the selection committee selected the Blueline Group. The scope of the project is
10,000 feet of waterline replacement (5,000 feet/year) ranging from 6 to12" diameter. The age of the
pipe vary from 1920s to 1950s and will address fire flow at various locations. The overall contract is
$428,420 which includes a management reserve of $17,380 as well as reserves for potholing work. This
contract will be paid by the Water Utility Fund. Staff will return to Council this time next year to amend
the contract to do design work in 2023.
Packet Pg. 383
12.1.c
12/14/21 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
Questions and discussion followed regarding the process of designing one year and building the
following year, whether work could be done in-house versus by an outside consultant, lack of in-house
capacity for design work, and fire flow rates.
Action: 1 /4/22 Consent Agenda
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 p.m.
Packet Pg. 384