2022-04-19 City Council - Full Agenda-3146Op E D
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
APRIL 19, 2022, 7:00 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING
ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A
VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY
DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO
UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND
OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL
MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. ROLL CALL
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. Snohomish Health District Update (20 min)
2. 2021 Public Defender's Office Annual Report (20 min)
5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO
Edmonds City Council Agenda
April 19, 2022
Page 1
THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.
7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting (Audit Exit Conference) of March 29, 2022
2. Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of March 31, 2022
3. Approval of Minutes of Council Meeting of April 5, 2022
4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
5. Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
6. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Lacey Gray
7. Written Public Comments
8. Confirm Appointment of Candidate to a board/commission
9. Confirm Appointment of Candidate to a board/commission
10. Human Services Program Manager Position Revision
11. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with The Blueline Group to provide Capital Projects
Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services
12. February 2022 Monthly Financial Report
13. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2
Project
14. Park Planner and Capital Project Manager Job Description Approval
15. Lead Building Maintenance Operator Job Description
16. Resolution Extending Temporary Emergency Sick Leave Policy
17. Procedure for Accepting Written Public comments
18. WWTP Program Administrator
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Resolution to adopt findings in support of the BD2 moratorium (15 min)
2. Interim Design Standards for Multifamily -only Buildings in the BD2 zone (20 min)
3. ARPA Funding Status (20 min)
4. Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Tltle 4 Licenses (30 min)
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. Council Committee Minutes (0 min)
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
April 19, 2022
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Snohomish Health District Update
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Pursuant to the interlocal agreement with the Snohomish Health District, the District is required to
provide a quarterly update report to the City Council.
Staff Recommendation
No action required. For information only.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Edmonds —Spring 2022 SHD Update
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
r:
Working Together for a
Healthy and Thriving Edmonds
Katie Curtis
Director
Prevention Services
April 2022
47*=k SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
4N W W W Packet Pg. 4
Community
DATA & TRENDS
STRATEGIC G(
RIU
1.
LU
cu
Packet Pg. 6
4.1.a
Building for the Future
0
Advancing clear.
03 open S honest f
Responsible use communication
Of resources
A05 Operating
as a team
04
4 driven by diversity, equity
& Inclusion
Snohomish Health District
Packet Pg. 7
STRATEGIC
REDUCE THE RAI
COMMUNICABLE
DISEASES AND OTHER
NOTIFIABLE CONDITIONS
4.1.a
COUNTYWIDE
TRENDS FOR 2021 VS. 2020
Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Hepatitis B & C
HIV (new cases)
Pertussis
Syphilis
Tuberculosis
4.1.a
COVID=19m. Looking Ahead
FOCUSED ON PRESERVING
HOSPITAL CAPACITY
PREPARING FOR VACCINES
BECOMING AVAILABLE FOR
YOUNGER CHILDREN
RECENT LIFTING OF
MASKING REQUIREMENTS
IN MOST SETTINGS
Packet Pg. 9
Preventing or Reducing Chronic
Disease and Injuries
250
200
Opioid-Related Deaths by Type
Snohomish County, 2006-2021*
(*2020 & 2021 data are preliminary as of 2121122)
'3
150
100
50
C
10'1
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
� All Drugs � Heroin � Rx Opioids � Synthetic Opioids All Opioids
Source: Washington State Department of Health
COUNTYWIDE
TRENDS FOR 2021 VS. 2020
Drug Overdoses* H
Youth Suicides I
0
_
N
E
0
M
0
c
a�
c�
0
co
N
N
O
N
C
CL
0
E
w
a�
E
z
U
2
r
Q
Snohomish Health District
Packet Pg. 10
4.1.a
Adult Fatality Reviews - SHB 1074
'L
0
E
O
M
O
CU
0
N
N
O
N
Q1
C
Q
Cn
N
C
O
E
W
C
O
E
t
c.�
R
r
Q
Snohomish Health District Packet Pg. 11
EDMONDS
TRENDS FOR 2021
235 Annual Food Permits
346 Food Inspections /I ?
0
23 Food Complaints
O
66 Year -Round and
46 Seasonal Pool Inspections
vsAw ,16
4 Septic Complaints
8 Solid Waste Complaints
PROVIDE HIGH-QUALI
-�VIRONMENTAL HEALTH SEWE--
4
4.1.a
Environmental Health
✓ New resources coming online due to new state funds
✓ Working on an initiative to digitize our paper records
✓ Food safety code revision took effect March 1 St
✓ School safety inspections in progress
✓ Solid waste complaints on nuisance
✓ Front counter is fully open
Snohomish Health District i Packet Pg. 13
0
OUTREACH & EDUCATION
ACTIVITIES - 2021
330 Families Provided w/ Access
to Baby &Child Dentistry Info
600+ Child Care Consultations
1,192 Children w/ Special Health
Care Needs Services Performed
3,635 STARS Courses Completed
3,891 People & Providers
Reached w/ Oral Health
Outreach
M
iI
L-1
,,At-�V
STRATEGIC GO
MPROVE MATERNA
CHILD & FAMILM
EALTH OUTC�59�
STRATEGIC GOAL:
ADDRESS ONGOIN , CR
PUBLIC HEALTH ISS
u
Updating the Community Health Assessment
r
Snowo :O.,i1\N1.A
ve'ei whi fYenplr yyry� '�'ueum tle[a �.-•.. •-'-,••• •w aaf q�ulatlua
s ymare rq pdn�he. mu.ry dam �e �'d°�Po�e irtmuaoon �mera
n � eIM ihr•rtldbra� �hra'gn a�� �F va[er�in Ole [wyeO(�
'm`"Ml Mlellr�
_ eMl
__ PmVve �^�e dlrecuot,
a�durYn m ep�ie� cans k1 b Ire uvi! °" force. Thn
�. � �� •I^�n'AYe� �a horwYy, �_mprnlpry mni ages +ere Nr
pi[s h orJer d'ryonmm ;'f1�ie � H6Wtl+Rr dNor. � �=M�
MwiAh csn,�cM;
�
Patheweaty
ya.M'ds.ar
k_.a uw warm
� yy
'L
L
L
N
E
0
t
O
C
Q
CO
N
N
O
N
C
CL
(n
i
0
E
W
C
w
E
t
u
2
Q
Snohomish Health District
Packet Pg. 16
Ways to Get
INVOLVED
Introducing the ABCs for Healthy Kids Campaign
ABCs FOR HEALTHY KIDS
Cy
61 Annual
Well -Child Visits
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
wwwsreono.orec
ABCs FOR HEALTHY KIDS 4spMGsH
0 Brush and
Floss Daily
�do110o O T the ryFCh arum Aut to Step n Order...
Monday
Wedndaday
_ fhu daq I J
edday
5eturd.y r' l
••"vQ'�yll�nlr7/�\ 5undar
DOWNLOAD ACTIVITIES AT
www.snohd.org/activities
DATE
TOPIC
Jan 3
A
Annual Well Child Checks
Jan 17
B
Brush & Floss Daily
Jan 31
C
Covid & Flu Vaccines
Feb 14
D
Drink More Water
Feb 28
E
Eat Fruits and Vegetables
Mar 14
F
Focus on Physical & Mental Health
Mar 28
G
Get Babies to Sleep Safely
Apr 11
H
Have a Plan
Apr 25
1
Inspect Living Spaces
May 9
J
Just Breathe
May 23
K
Keep Things Locked Up
Jun 6
L
Learn to Swim
Jun 20
M
Move Your Body
DATE
TOPIC
Jul 4
N
No Sunburns Allowed
Jul 18
O
Open to New Things
Aug 1
P
Prepare for Takeoff
Aug 15
Q
Questions are Healthy
Aug 29
R
Ready for School
Sep 12
S
Social Media Smart
Sep 26
T
Tough Conversations
Oct 10
U
Under Pressure
Oct 24
V
Vaccinate
Nov 7
W
Wash Your Hands
Nov 21
X
X-Ray Vision
Dec 5
Y
You Are Important
Dec 20
Z
Zzzzz Healthy Sleep Habits
Packet Pg. 18
4.1.a
Thank you
contact information
For more info, please contact:
Katie Curtis
Prevention Services Director
425.339.8711
KCurtis@snohd.org
Shawn Frederick, MBA
Administrative Officer
425.339.8687
SFrederick@snohd.or
Packet Pg. 19
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
2021 Public Defender's Office Annual Report
Staff Lead: Emily Wagener, for Kathleen Kyle, SCPDA
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: Emily Wagener
Background/History
The City contracts for public defender services with Snohomish County Public Defender Association
(SCPDA). Each year, the public defender's office provides a presentation and an annual report to City
Council. This was previously presented to Finance Committee on 2/8/2022.
Staff Recommendation
None.
Narrative
SCPDA is providing a presentation along with a report for 2021 services. The 2021 Annual Report and
presentation slides are attached. The attached presentation has been slightly modified from the
2/8/2022 Committee presentation.
Attachments:
Edmonds 2021 Annual Report
2021 Edmonds Year in Review v2
Packet Pg. 20
4.2.a
23;
VUBLIC DEFFh44PR
9
►sr
i°
A
cep
FOGNDED SESEPTE�gl3
Snohomish County Public Defender Association
2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 200 • Everett, WA 98201-3527
Phone: 425-339-6300 • Fax: 425-339-6363 • www.snocopda.org
This is the 2021 Annual Report of the Snohomish County Public Defender Association
(SCPDA) to the City of Edmonds.
Quality Representation
SCPDA's mission is to provide the highest quality of representation for people facing
loss of liberty pursuant to civil and criminal laws and who cannot afford to hire an attorney.
We serve an indigent population. In Edmonds, the services provided are solely criminal
defense services. Edmonds Municipal Court conducts the financial screening to determine
eligibility to be appointed a SCPDA public defender.
In 2021, the primary public defenders assigned to Edmonds Municipal Court were
Sonya Daisley-Harrison, Tamara Comeau, and Maya Titova. They were supervised by
attorney Christine Olson.
In 2022, the attorneys assigned to Edmonds Municipal Court are Tamara Comeau,
Catherine Bentley, and Ali Burton. They are supervised by attorney Kathryn Fraser.
SCPDA mission is guided by Indigent Defense Standards adopted by the Washington
State Bar Association (WSBA). Other resources that guide quality public defense include the
Performance Guidelines for Criminal Defense Performance, Washington statutes, case law,
N
O
N.
Packet Pg. 21
4.2.a
court rules, WSBA Rules of Professional Conduct, and American Bar Association
publications.'
SCPDA produces monthly reports for the City of Edmonds Public Defender Assessor,
Bob Boruchowitz. Mr. Boruchowitz conducts an independent assessment of SCPDA services
based on the monthly reports and conference calls, his own court observations, interviewing
Judge Rivera, as well as listening to audio recordings of court hearings.
SCPDA staff includes attorneys, administrative professionals, IT professionals,
investigators, and social workers.
Public Defender Assignments
In 2021, Edmonds Municipal Court appointed SCPDA as counsel in 483 pre-trial
cases and I I probation -only cases. There is a reduced number of new referrals as compared
N
to prior years. This reflects the shift in enforcement priorities due to COVID-19 and N
litigation and reform regarding Driving While License Suspended, Third Degree.
During the year, SCPDA attorneys initiated 174 defense investigation requests,
referred 9 cases for immigration consultation services, and submitted 45 social worker
requests.' These services help improve outcomes and demonstrate quality services. SCPDA
conducted two jury trials.
1 Hyperlinks for reference materials:
https://www.wsba.org/docs/defau It -sou rce/legal-com mu n ity/com m ittees/cou ncil-on-pu bl ic-defense/sta ndards-
for-indigent-def-services-boh-apprv-9-22-11. pdf?sfvrsn=dae43cf1 2
https://www.wsba. o rg/docs/d efa u It -sou rce/I ega I -co m m u n ity/com m ittees/co u nci I-on-public-defense/pe rf-
gu ideli nes-for-cri mi na I-def-rep-060311. pdf?sfvrsn=c2e43cf1 2
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal aid indigent defendants/Is sclaid def ten
principlesbooklet.authcheckdam.pdf
2021 Annual Report — Page 2
Packet Pg. 22
4.2.a
Current Challenges
In prior years, the top three case types, compromising more than 50% of the referrals,
were driving while license suspended third degree, theft third degree, and possession of drug
paraphernalia. In 2021, the top three case types shifted to third degree theft, assault fourth
degree, and driving under the influence. This is a significant shift in the caseload
composition.
Comparing Top 3 Case Types in 2021
to 2020
Theft
Assault
D U I �����44
57
73
0 20 40 60 s0 100
2021 02020
111111051
120
11MIJI
Previously, the majority of the cases referred to SCPDA were the types of charges enforced
against predominately marginalized and vulnerable people. Addiction, physical and mental
disabilities, violence, and nonviolence occurs in all spaces no matter how rich or poor. And
yet, criminal prosecutions disproportionately impact people experiencing generational or
140
O
Q.
m
c
a
O
Y)
0
a
N
O
N
O
CL
c
c
a
N
O
N
N
c
O
W
r
C
d
E
cc
a
2021 Annual Report — Page 3
Packet Pg. 23
4.2.a
episodic poverty, people of color, and women. See Exhibit 1 for a list of the Top 6 case
types.
These principles are highlighted in the 2021 How Gender and Race Affect Justice
Now report produced the Washington Gender and Justice Commission. Link to the full report
provided in the footnote below.' The goals recommended by the report include improving
data collection, improve access to courts, address the impacts of the vast increase in
incarceration over the last generation, reduce reliance on revenue from court users to fund
the courts, and identify the best evidence -based curricula for judicial and legal education on
gender and race bias.'
Another current challenge is the lack of adequate housing and social services in our
community. For example, there are virtually very limited to no open appointments with
mental health providers. This creates a strain on people who are court ordered to engage in
these services and for people seeking supports. The increase in investigation and social
worker requests depict the increased needs of cases and clients this past year.
2021 Investigation and Social Worker Requests
so
49
24 Y2 23
3 1 I M IN
Q1 02 Q3 04
■ Investigation ■ Social Work
3 GJ Study Pilot DVMRT.pdf (wa.gov)
4 Link to the summary of the report: How Gender and Race Affect Justice Now (kitsapbar.org)
2021 Annual Report — Page 4
Packet Pg. 24
4.2.a
Lastly, with legislative and other reforms related to law enforcement vehicle cameras
and body cameras, public defenders are receiving larger volumes and types of discovery and
this trend is only going to increase moving forward. These reforms will increase transparency
and objectively document interactions between law enforcement and community members.
Generally, these are welcomed policy changes. It is very difficult to estimate the full impact
on workload. More video discovery will increase workloads to all public defender roles:
• Administrative professionals to receive and log each item of discovery
• IT who builds and maintains the servers and database systems
• Legal Assistants to assist organizing discovery
• Attorneys, investigators, and social workers who need to review the discovery.
As a learning organization, SCPDA is planning how to support our Defenders for
these challenges ahead. In 2021, SCPDA provided 22 continuing legal education classes, 24
Coffee Breaks, informal virtual meetings to hear from community members and agencies and N
0
N.
their great work, and the management team participated in 19 Anti -racism training r_
discussions. Our work in 2022 continues. We are working to incorporate the
recommendations of the 2021 How Gender and Race Affect Justice report recommendations
to public defenders which includes addressing the negative impacts of warrants when
indigent people do not appear in court for court hearings and recognizing trauma and
addressing it as part of our defense of the people we represent.
2021 Annual Report — Page 5
Packet Pg. 25
4.2.a
Exhibit 1: Top 6 Case Types in 2022
CASE TYPES
2021 Totals
%
Theft
124
26%
Assault 4
73
15%
DUI
44
9%
Criminal Trespass 2
26
5%
Violation of Court Order
26
5%
Criminal Trespass 1
24
5%
N
O
N
2021 Annual Report — Page 6
Packet Pg. 26
p U B L I
�C31
Flo
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 27
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
2
Q
4.2.b
AGENDA
c
c
Q
m
O
L
V
r
N
O
N
N
3
A)
m
c
•L
N
C
O
E
W
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
2
Q
Packet Pg. 28
4.2.b
"Of all the rights that an accused person has, the
right to be represented by counsel is by far the most
pervasive for it affects his ability to assert any other
rights he may have."
United States a Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 654 (1984)
Packet Pg. 29
4.2.b
PUBLIC DEFENSE IS IMPORTANT
Required by law
Required by a just society
Work to ensure the most vulnerable are treated with
consideration
Mission to provide the highest quality of representation to
people facing loss of liberty
Packet Pg. 30
4.2.b
2022 & 2023 BUDGET
PROPOSALS
c
c
a
0
Y)
0
a
N
O
N
N
d
d
C
i
R
d
N
C
O
E
W
r
N
O
N
r-+
C
O
E
L
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 31
4.2.b
COST DRIVERS
Increased staffing & overhead costs
Difficult to forecast workload trends due to COVID Emergency
orders and impacts to enforcement priorities due
Opposing trends:
Increased number of pending cases
Decreased number of incoming referrals
Increased need for community support
Decreased availability of community services
Packet Pg. 32
4.2.b
• $31,764-56 per
month
• $33,5,45 per month
• $36,290 per mont[
N
O
N
r-+
C
0
E
L
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 33
4.2.b
2021 DEFENDERS
1
'11��1
f�t:,
a+
a
(D
O
Y)
aD
c
aD
a
0
a
N
O
N
N
d
d
C
i
R
d
N
O
E
W
r
N
O
N
Packet Pg. 34
v
N
Q
Packet Pg. 36
ea
Q
m
O
L
d
_
d
d
G
V
IL
N
O
N
N
d
d
C
•L
d
N
_
O
E
W
r
N
O
N
r-+
_
O
E
L
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 37
4.2.b
800
700
mm
500
400
300
200
m
0
621
2017
Cases Assigned by Year
634
2018
MOW
2019
557
2020
483
N
CD
- N
N
F'r
m
N
C
O
E
W
N
O
N
2021
C
N
t
V
a
Packet Pg. 38
4.2.b
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
144
Q l
Comparing 2020 to 2021 Case Assignments
155
IM
Q2
130
■ 2020 ■ 2021
173
Q3
ff$X
155
ME
106
a
0
L
m
0
a
N
0
N
m
d'
c
•L
m
N
O
E
W
N
O
N
c
w
2
a
Packet Pg. 39
Theft
Assault
DUI
Comparing Top 3 Case Types in 2021 to 2020
73
65
44
57
124
114
0 20 40 60 80 100 1 -
■ 2021 ■ 2020
Packet Pg. 40
4.2.b
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2021 Investigation and Social Worker Requests
E:�61
49
0
24
3 ■
Q1 Q2
Investigation
22
10
Q3
■ Social Work
23
12
c
c
Q
0
L
v
N
O
N
N
d
•L
N
C
O
E
W
N
O
N
E
a
Packet Pg. 41
4.2.b
REDUCED DWLS 3 PROSECUTIONS YEAR TO YEAR
COMPARISON
180 165
160
140
120
100 94
80
60
40 19
20
0
2019 2020 2021
c
c
a
0
Y)
0
N
O
N
N
•L
N
C
O
W
r
N
O
N
r-+
C
O
E
a
Packet Pg. 42
4.2.b
2022 Open Assignments Graph
Open Caseload —
Open Caseload
Open Caseload
by Attorney
111111111110��
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
124
151
140 160
159
c
c
Q
0
0
N
O
N
N
3
A)
m
y
180
O
E
W
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
2
Q
Packet Pg. 43
4.2.b
OTHER WORI(LOAD MEASURES
Packet Pg. 44
22 CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
CLASSES
24 SCPDA COFFEE BREAKS
19 ANTIRACISM TRAINING SESSIONS
ea
Q
m
O
L
d
_
d
d
G
V
IL
N
O
N
N
d
d
C
•L
d
N
_
O
E
W
r
N
O
N
r-+
_
O
E
L
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 46
4.2.b
4k i
WILL,
Increase in Volume and Types of Discovery
•
. 4!�z
7 .0 (,
deg
if 100
•
s
h
ete d .0 tea Wilz stop oet a I iuck ford t: xpcdation
Mond light that was ot,t ����•��.�• -�r�
Packet Pg. 47
0
c
m
0
3
a
N
O
N
3
m
c
•L
d
N
C
O
E
W
N
O
N
c
w
U
2
a
U U-
La-.-I 51
IMPACT ON WORKLOAD
The law office assistants who receive and log
each item.
The law office assistants who redact discovery for
clients to review.
IT who builds and maintains the servers and
database systems where documents are stored.
Legal Assistants who assist in organizing
discovery in preparation for trials and
sentencings.
Attorneys, investigators, and social workers
who have to review it.
4.2.b
STATE V. BLAI(E
FEBRUARY 25, 2021
APRIL 20, 2021
Simple drug possession laws are unconstitutional.
Packet Pg. 49
v
N
4.2.b
COORDINATE MULTIPLE SYSTEMS
Mitigate impact to vulnerable people & public
and private investments when systems intersect:
Courts
Service Organizations
Medical and Behavioral Health Services
Churches
YWCA
Job Support Organizations
Food Banks
Housing Programs
Other public programs
Packet Pg. 51
Snohomish County Human Services — Trueblood Housing Vouchers
Housing Consortium of Everett & Snohomish County
Snohomish County Juvenile Court Cultural Advisory Committee
Snohomish County Corrections Citizen Advisory Committee
Washington State Bar Association, Council on Public Defense
Washington State Sex Offender Policy Board, subcommittee members
Washington Defender Association
Washington Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys
COMMUNITY
Washington State Bar Association Character and Fitness Board
INVOLVEMENT Teach in programs at UW School of Law and Edmonds College
Public defenders volunteer at:
Cocoon House, board member
Snohomish County Legal Services, board member
Washington Innocence Project, board member
Puget Sound Prisoner Support
Washington State Sex Offender Treatment Provider Committee
American Academy of Trial Lawyers Fellow — Natalie Tarantino
Guest lecturers at University of Washington, Seattle University, and
Edmonds Community College
Jackson High School Mock Trial Coaches
Packet Pg. 52
p U B L I
�C31
Flo
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 53
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
2
Q
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting (Audit Exit Conference) of March 29, 2022
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E032922 Audit Exit
Packet Pg. 54
7.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
ONLINE VIRTUAL
FEDERAL GRANT AUDIT EXIT MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
March 29, 2022
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Vivian Olson, Council President
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director
Megan Menkveld, Deputy Admin. Serv. Dir.
Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office
Nicholas Falk, Deputy City Clerk
1. CALL TO ORDER Q
The virtual online Audit Exit Conference was called to order at 3:02 p.m. by Administrative Services w
Director Dave Turley.
�a
2. FEDERAL GRANTS AUDIT EXIT REPORT TO COUNCIL Q
N
N
Mr. Turley introduced City staff and councilmembers. Kelly Collins, director of local audit, introduced N
Kristina Baylor, program manager; Kirk Gadbois, audit supervisor, State Auditor's Office (SAO). w
Ms. Collins advised a more detailed packet was sent to councilmembers electronically. She reviewed:
• Results that matter E
z
o Increased trust in government
o Independent, transparent examination a
o Improved efficiency of government
Mr. Gadbois reviewed the results of the City's fiscal year 2020 audit. The SAO performed three audits for
the City, 1) financial statement audit, 2) accountability audit, and 3) federal grant compliance audit. The
City had no reportable issues in the financial statement and accountability audits; one issue was identified
with the federal grant compliance audit. He reviewed:
Federal Grant Compliance Audit Results January 1, 202o through December 31, 2020
• Adverse Opinion Issued
o Opinion issued on the City's compliance with requirements applicable to its major program
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 1
Packet Pg. 55
7.1.a
o Audit conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform
Guidance
• Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs
o We reported no significant deficiencies in internal control
o We identified deficiencies that we consider to be material weaknesses
o We noted instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported
• Major Pro rams Selected for Audit
ALN
Program or Cluster Title
Total Amount Expended
21.019
COVID-19 - Coronavirus Relief Fund
1 $2,123,907
o These costs amount to approximately 86% of the total federal expenditures for 2020
Allowable Activities & Subrecipient Monitoring - Finding
0 2020-001: The City's internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal
requirements for allowable activities and costs and subrecipient monitoring (see pages 9-15 of
exit packet to review details of this recommendation) y
o City established grants for businesses negatively impacted by COVID pandemic
■ State provided funds to the City with the expectation that eligible criteria would be created, 5
businesses would apply and City would verify businesses met the eligibility criteria
- City established four eligibility criteria and City verified three of criteria were met, but c
fourth eligibility criteria, suffering a 30% loss of revenue between 2019 and April/May
as
2020, was not verified and City relied on self -certification from the business
- City hired an external contractor who gathered information from 172 businesses that
received funding to determine if they met the 30% revenue loss criteria. Contractor c
identified a few businesses that did not meet the 30% revenue loss requirement. In t�
reviewing the contractor's information, SAO identified a few more businesses and 8 0
businesses did not respond to the contractor's request for information. Some businesses
provided financial information for a full year 2020 and not just the 30% revenue loss o
for April/May as required by the City's eligibility criteria n
- These are identified as potentially unallowable expenditures. Q
o Subrecipient monitoring
■ City provided federal funds to four nonprofit groups to administer a program to provide w
assistance =a
■ Federal requirements expect the City to, 1) do a risk assessment for each nonprofit and Q
determine how familiar they are with using federal funds, how reliable they are, whether N
they get federal audits, and what type of monitoring they do to ensure when the City passes N
funds to the subrecipients, and 2) monitor whether federal funds are being distributing c
accurately w
- City did not do risk assessment of the four subrecipients or do adequate monitoring of
the subrecipients and their expenditures E
■ These costs were not included in the questioned cost amount because it is acceptable for 0
the City to have subrecipients, but these are identified as unsupported costs in the finding. a
Financial Audit Results January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020
• Unmodified Opinion Issued
o Opinion issued in accordance with U.S. GAAP
o Audit conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards
• Internal Control and Compliance over Finance Reporting
o We reported no significant deficiencies in internal controls
o We identified no deficiencies that we consider to be material weaknesses
o We noted no instances of noncompliance that were material to the financial statements of the
City
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 2
Packet Pg. 56
7.1.a
o Note: Statement on page 17, "Given these limitations, we did not identify any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses, but some may exist that are not identified." is not related
to COVID or Edmonds in particular; sentence is included because the SAO takes a risk -based
approach and looks at certain accounting systems and tests certain transactions but not
everything.
Required Communications
o Uncorrected misstatements have been provided for review
o There were no material misstatements in the financial statements corrected by management
during the audit
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)
o Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
■ Optional award program offered from the GFOA
■ Requires preparation and subsequent audit review of additional financial schedules
■ Letter dated June 30, 2021
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the SAO for the report and said she enjoyed reading it. She referred to
the grant funding internal controls which he stated were inadequate and noted he also mentioned the CARES
Act and the four subrecipients. She asked if that was the City's community fund which included the senior
center. Mr. Gadbois answered the four were Wellspring, Homage, Washington Kinds in Transition and the
food bank.
Councilmember Chen commented he also enjoyed reading the audit report which was very well written and
represented a lot of hard work. He thanked the SAO for pointing out deficiencies so the City can improve.
He referred to the finding related to the fourth criteria for businesses, a 30% revenue loss, which was not
met as well as the lack of monitoring and no risk assessment for the four nonprofits and asked if those
expenditures are not allowable, do the businesses and nonprofits have to return the funds or how would that
be handled. Mr. Gadbois answered the SAO is the reporting agency; the report will be sent to the
Department of Commerce (DOC), the pass -through agent who provided the money to the City, and there
will be an audit resolution process where the DOC will review the report, likely contact the City for further
information, and make a decision on next steps.
Councilmember Chen referred to the 8 businesses that did not respond to the request for information and
the 29 businesses that did not meet the eligibility criteria and asked if those businesses were disclosed or
kept confidential. Mr. Gadbois answered everything is public, but the businesses are not listed in the report.
The City knows which businesses did not respond and which ones were ineligible based on the information
provided to the SAO and staff could provide that information. Councilmember Chen asked Mr. Turley to
send that list to the council.
Councilmember Paine referred to the lack of a risk assessment of the nonprofits and lack of monitoring and
asked if there was some recognition that this was a novel event and that the City had never considered how
to give money directly to businesses and nonprofits. Mr. Gadbois answered yes, that is recognized in the
cause of decision, that this was a unique event and in an effort to preserve its local economy, the City acted
quickly in providing assistance payments to businesses and nonprofits. It was a unique event that required
immediate disbursement of funds, but that does not relieve the City of the requirement to follow the
subrecipient monitoring. Councilmember Paine asked who makes the decision about how to handle funds
that were distributed. Mr. Gadbois answered the DOC will advise the City of any next steps and the City
will determine what to do next. Councilmember Paine said she also enjoyed reading the audit report, finding
it very readable.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised the Council Finance Committee will review the audit findings. She
relayed some people have asked for audit report, but it was her understanding it would not be distributed
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 3
Packet Pg. 57
a
7.1.a
until April I". Mr. Gadbois said the report was provided to councilmembers in advance because they did
not want citizens to have access to it before the council. The reports will be released to the public on March
315t
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the SAO found a lot of exceptions related to the CARES Act and in
other cities because this was such a new program with many restrictions. Mr. Gadbois answered yes, this
was a brand new federal program that was issued very quickly. Edmonds is not unique; many governments
around the state have similar issues; not all, because some cities and government decided they only wanted
to use the funds for payroll, purchase PPE, etc.
Mr. Gadbois continued his review:
Accountability Audit Results 1/l/20 - 12/31/20
• Results in brief
o This report describes the overall results and conclusions for the areas we examined
o In those selected areas, City operations complied, in all material aspects, with applicable state
laws, regulations, and its own policies, and provided adequate controls over the safeguarding
of public resources
o In keeping with general auditing practices, we do not examine every transaction, activity,
policy, internal control, or area. As a result, no information is provided on the areas that were
not examined.
o Some housekeeping items were identified that have been communicated to staff.
• Using a risk -based audit approach for the City, we examined the following areas during the period: v
o Accounts receivable - utility billing, adjustments and collections c
■ Received a citizen hotline concern about rates being used for stormwater billing
- SAO conducted full utility billing system review, identified no significant issues other o
than a couple best -practice issues. a
- Related to the citizen's concern, the ordinance related to utility billings identifies which Q
rates are used for water billing, but sections regarding stormwater and sewer billing do
not identify specific rates to be used. Minor exit item to redo that ordinance to provide w
some language in the stormwater and sewer sections regarding rates to be used in
billings. Q
o Payroll - leave balances and accruals and end of employment payments N
o Court financial activities - evaluated design of controls for bank reconciliation process N
o Compliance with rental agreement contract terms including rent waivers during the COVID- c
19 pandemic w
■ City waived lease payments to some nonprofits. c
- SAO reviewed in detail and did not identify any issues as a result. E
o Financial condition - reviewing for indications of financial distress
o Open public meetings - compliance with minutes, meetings and executive session requirements
■ Did not identify any issues with meeting minutes or how executive session are held. One a
exit item shared with City regarding meetings; if a quorum of councilmembers is present,
it must be publicly announced and advertised. State law does not differentiate between in -
person, Zoom, phone or email meetings/conversations. The law states if there is discussion
of City business and a quorum of councilmembers is present, it must be an open public
meeting.
Councilmember Chen referred to page 3 of the audit packet, minor finding #8 related to transfer between
funds and asked if the SAO recommended as a general practice not to transfer funds between funds. Mr.
Gadbois answered the City can definitely transfer funds; it is a very common practice. This comment was
related to cost allocations, when funds are transferred between restricted and unrestricted funds, ensuring
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 4
Packet Pg. 58
7.1.a
there was adequate support and that it could be traced back to the original fund. He recalled in this case the
City self -identified that its ER&R fund had more money in it than originally anticipated was needed so
funds were to be transferred back to the original fund, but there was not adequate documentation regarding
where it should have been transferred.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked about dates where compliance with OPMA was reviewed. Mr. Gadbois
answered they primarily looked at 2020. They read the minutes up through present looking for subsequent
event, but are primarily looking for material items. The main scope of the OPMA review was the audit year.
Councilmember Chen referred to packet page 16, under the paragraph titled internal control over financial
reporting, where it states we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the city's internal controls.
Mr. Gadbois answered they give an opinion on the City's financial statements but not on internal controls.
Auditing standards require they report on any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses if any are
identified, but not on internal controls.
Mr. Turley said he had a hard time believing how many people enjoyed reading the exit packet. Most of
the audit process is absolute torture, reviewing records and minutia. The auditor's office comports
themselves very professionally. Exit items are his favorite part of the audit, because they provides tips on
making small improvements.
Councilmember Chen observed the SAO charges the City $100,000 to perform audit. He asked why the
City has to pay for a service the state provides. Ms. Collins answered every government is responsible for
the accountability of their own public funds. In Washington, the SAO is created through the state C
constitution to audit local governments. Audit needs differ such as not every entity requires a federal or c
financial audit and audit costs differ based on the size of the operation and their needs. Well run cities' audit
costs can be lower but if there are a lot of issues, audit costs can be much higher. She summarized c
Washington is not set up to fund audits. The SAO operates more like a CPA firm with cities paying for the n
local government audit. At the state level, state agency audits are funded through the state and performance Q
audits have a different funding stream. There are different funding streams depending on the type of =
government being audited and the type of audit being conducted. For example, cybersecurity audits are w
done at no cost and are funded via a small portion of sales tax. It is an incentive for governments to have
good controls to hopefully keep audit costs down. Federal audits can be funded through federal grants.
Q
N
Mr. Turley said he used to work for a CPA firm in another state that audited cities and towns. In CD
Washington, the SAO audits all the cities in the state; other states do not have that requirement. In other c
states, a city contracts with a professional CPA firm and would likely pay four times the rate that is paid to w
the SAO. The City receives a really good audit from the SAO because that is all they do; they are experts
and are very inexpensive. Ms. Collins agreed it was a good value for the dollar.
E
z
Councilmember Chen expressed his appreciation for the SAO's hard work and said small findings were
better than big deficiencies. Q
Ms. Baylor reviewed:
Closing Remarks
o Auditor costs are in alignment with our original estimate
■ Next audit: May 2022
■ Accountability for public resources
■ Financial statement
■ Federal programs
o An estimated cost for the next audit has been provided in our exit packet
Report publication
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 5
Packet Pg. 59
7.1.a
o Audit reports are published on our website
o Sign up to be notified by email when audit reports are posted to our website:
hllps://sao.wa.gov/aboutn-sao/sign-gp-for-news-alerts/
o Audit survey
■ When your report is released you will receive an audit survey from use. We value your
opinions on our audit services and hope you provide feedback.
Mr. Gadbois thanked City finance staff for working with them on the audit which started in late April 2021.
The audit lasted a little longer than normal, but throughout the entire audit the City was very open to
communicating with the SAO and worked hard to provide the information they needed. He expressed his
appreciation to Mr. Turley, Ms. Menkveld and the entire finance team.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation to the auditors as well as Mr. Turley, Ms. Menkveld and the
rest of the finance team for working with the auditors to produce such a wonderful report. He recalled when
he was an auditor, no one liked him and was amazed City staff liked the auditors. He asked the auditors to
look into the future; the state has been making a lot of effort related to diversity, equity and inclusion. With
that effort, one of the key tools is equitable spending for municipal and state government. The beginning of
the audit report states, "Our mission is to provide citizens with independent and transparent examination of
how state and local governments use public funds and develop strategies that make government more
efficient and more effective." He did not find any verbiage in that mission about equity, diversity and
inclusion and envisioned in the future the state audit mission and standards would reflect that. One of the
ways government can ensure diversify, equity and inclusion is by looking at how the funds collected from
taxpayers are spent to reflect that value. He asked the timeline for changing that standard.
Ms. Collins answered there hasn't been discussion of that as an area of audit focus. Federal guidelines
dictate the grant audits as well as the financial audits; accountability is related to safeguarding public funds. c
The area Councilmember Chen described would be more of a performance audit. She offered to discuss a
Councilmember Chen's ideas with him and that take forward to their division regarding performance audits. Q
Councilmember Chen agreed that was a much bigger issue and should come from the legislature and may =
require a state initiative. He noted the City is hiring a full time DEI position. w
�a
Councilmember Paine thanked the audit team for spending time with the council today. It was a concise,
Q
precise report and it was great to have the feedback. The City is developing policies and practices related N
to DEI. She has some experience with performance audits as a former school board member.
N
M
Councilmember Buckshnis echoed what other councilmember have said. She pointed out there will more w
grant funds available via the infrastructure bill and she recalled discussion about establishing policies,
procedures and training. She asked if the scope of the 2021 audit related to those funding packages would m
E
be as robust as the 2020 audit. Mr. Gadbois answered yes, if they are selected as part of the federal grant
compliance audit.
Q
3. ADJOURN
With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 3:55 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 6
Packet Pg. 60
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of March 31, 2022
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E033122 Special
Packet Pg. 61
7.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL
ONLINE VIRTUAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
March 31, 2022
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Vivian Olson, Mayor Pro Tem
Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Michelle Bennett, Police Chief
Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 11:46 a.m. by Mayor Pro Tem.
Olson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember L. Johnson read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge
the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect
their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the
land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely, with the
exception of Mayor Nelson.
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. UPDATE OF COBRA POLICY TO ADDRESS DEATH OF AN EMPLOYEE
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 31, 2022
Page 1
Packet Pg. 62
7.2.a
HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson thanked the council for making time for this. She explained as is often
the case, gaps in benefits offered to staff are identified when an emergency arises. This is one of those
unfortunate circumstance where there was a death of employee; when she asked, no one could remember
the last time that had occurred. In this instance, staff became aware when an employee dies, they may have
dependents and/or spouse on the City's healthcare coverage. While those dependents and spouse are dealing
with transitioning, life insurance, etc., they may also be dealing with the additional cost of immediately
paying for COBRA to continue their healthcare coverage. There was some initial discussion about just
addressing this instance, but Mayor Nelson was very supportive of a policy on an ongoing basis that would
address this very rare occurrence when an employee passes away and the City has an opportunity to provide
a more smooth transition to a family who is already in grief.
Ms. Neill Hoyson reviewed the proposal, an addition to the existing COBRA policy that states in the event
of the death of an employee, the City will pay for up to three months of COBRA coverage for family
members currently enrolled in the City's health plan. The City would pay it directly to the COBRA
administrator rather than the family which addresses taxation issues and the family would need to enroll in
COBRA as required. All the COBRA rules remain in place, but the proposed change gives the City the
opportunity to pay for three months to help a family in grief not worry about losing their healthcare
coverage. She summarized the proposed policy is very simple and to the point.
Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis said this is a good idea. She asked if it would be considered a gift of
public funds and do other cities have a similar policy. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered it would not as long as
the City has a policy. The administrative services director stated without a council approved policy, it would
be a gift of public funds. Having a council policy in place addresses that issue.
Councilmember L. Johnson relayed her understand this is for the City to pay for the next three months of
healthcare coverage. She asked if the family has the ability to pay out of pocket to continue COBRA
coverage. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered absolutely. This is related to timing; when an employee dies, per the
City's policy, the family receives a greater cash out of sick leave, there is life insurance, etc. which
eventually provide the family with the funds to continue to pay for COBRA. The reason for this policy is
to assist in the first few months when those additional funds are not available. She summarized the family
would have the opportunity to continue to self -pay for COBRA for the full legal time period which she
believed was 36 months. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if three months was long enough for those
moving pieces to come together. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered yes.
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE EMERGENCY COBRA COVERAGE OF THREE MONTHS AS
PROPOSED IN THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Police Chief Bennett thanked the council, commenting this means a lot to his family and to Edmonds Police
officers.
Councilmember Chen said he stopped by the south gate of the police station last night and was touched by
the table covered with flowers. He thanked the public for the outpouring of support. Chief Bennett agreed
the table was completely covered with flowers, cards, and balloons and a great deal of food has also been
delivered to the Police Department. She recognized the community for their amazing outpouring of support
including a Lake Forest Park officer who delivered a carved wood sign he made for the Steffins' family
and a famous artist who is a resident of Edmonds who dropped off a picture he drew of Officer Steffins.
6. ADJOURN
With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 11:56 a.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 31, 2022
Page 2
Packet Pg. 63
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of Minutes of Council Meeting of April 5, 2022
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E040522
Packet Pg. 64
7.3.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL HYBRID MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
April 5, 2022
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Vivian Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
ALSO PRESENT
Brook Roberts, Student Representative
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human
Services Director
Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director
Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Mgr.
Mike Clugston, Senior Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:22 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Olson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag
salute.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson advised the City was experiencing technical difficulties; the video had been lost
previously and may be lost again. The audio will be available throughout the meeting.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the
original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor
Nelson.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 1
Packet Pg. 65
N
N
Ln
0
0
w
c
m
E
t
0
2
Q
7.3.a
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem. Olson described the procedures for in -person audience comments.
Linda Fireman, Edmonds, said she would be commenting on zoning as it relates to proposed plan 2021-
0066. She relayed 605 and 611 Main are zoned BD2 or Downtown Mixed Commercial. Ordinance 3955
relates only to BD 1 and only shows subdistricts and permitted uses and is included on the website in
Chapter 16.43 DB Downtown Business Permitted Uses for BD2 under 16.43.020 uses for residential and
does not reference designated street fronts. Under Table 16.43-1 it can be a single family dwelling or
multiple dwelling units but must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45-feet from the
sidewalk or rights -of -way. The code is very easy to understand; there is no reference to designated street
fronts and there is no B Permitted secondary uses or C. Primary uses requiring conditional use permit
shown under the permitted uses for BD2. Table 16.43-1 documents the permitted uses; multiple dwelling
units in BD2 must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45-feet from sidewalk or rights -of -
way. Multiple dwelling units can be on the ground floor at 605/611 Main Street as long as they are
located behind the first 45-feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way. She proposed if the proposed
apartment building is allowed to proceed without commercial space that the zoning be changed to RM-1.5
before planning begins and conform to zoning of the neighborhood. 601 Main is now a single family
home. A public hearing and referendum would be welcome.
Susie Schafer, Edmonds, read a proclamation from Governor Inslee on native plants: c
WHEREAS, native plant species are an important part of Washington's heritage, providing important v
aesthetic, economic and ecological contributions that make Washington a special place to live; and °
WHEREAS, Washington enjoys an amazing biodiversity with over 3,000 native plant species, from >
rain forest plants on the Olympic Peninsula to the desert species in Eastern Washington; and °
n
WHEREAS, preserving native plant ecosystems is critical for protecting wildlife, birds, fish and °
water quality in our state; and a
WHEREAS, native plant ecosystems protect our watersheds by recharging natural aquifers, cm
modulating stream flows, filtering water and reducing erosion and flooding; and Q
WHEREAS, over 350 of our native plant species are listed as rare by the Washington Natural w
Heritage Program; and
WHEREAS invasive species present a great threat to sustaining our native plant ecosystems and m
biodiversity; and
WHEREAS, climate change significantly impacts Washington's native plants and their habitats,
requiring action to protect them from climate change; a
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jay Inslee, Governor of the state of Washington, do hereby proclaim the
month of April 2022 as Native Plant Appreciation Month in Washington and I encourage all people in our
state to join me in appreciating, enjoying and celebrating our floral diversity by learning more about our
native plants and their habitats.
Ms. Schaefer continued, stating this was a fabulous proclamation and she was happy to share it with the
council and the public. She encouraged the city council, mayor, all departments, commissions and boards
to adopt this and follow it. She relayed the native plant demonstration garden has reopened. It was
replanted on March 12t' and many the plants relocated to City Park. The first program at the
demonstration garden will be held later this month.
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, relayed she opened her real estate brokerage in 1980; she started in real estate
in Magnolia in 1971 and almost bought an office there but is grateful she came to Edmonds because it is a
community that can come together and speak to its council. She expressed her appreciation to the council
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 2
Packet Pg. 66
7.3.a
for their service, recognizing it was not an easy job. The council is good at their jobs and may be about
the best council the City has had. She has worked under 5-6 mayors, recalling Harve Harrison was a part-
time mayor when she opened her brokerage. The community has worked hard to retain and restore the
specialness of Edmonds. It has been her pleasure to have the historic house at 524 Main Street, built in
1890 for the blacksmith and his daughter. She encouraged the community to continue to work together,
noting she has been on a lot of committees including currently serving on the cemetery board.
Recognizing that density is coming, she expressed support for retaining parks and green areas. She
reiterated her thanks to the city council.
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, referred to agenda item 8.1, interim design standards relaying comments
from a local, well -respected architect who has dedicated the majority of his over 20-year professional
career to the analysis and design of building envelop systems who reviewed staff s proposed design
standards. "I read the 22.43.080 additional design standards you sent. My opinions are an attempt to work
within the ideas these new additional design standards address. My opinions: 1. Intent: this statement is
too broad in nature, "compatible" is meaningless without further parameters. Such items as building to
human scale by vertical and horizontal modulation, building setbacks after a certain height and other
defining parameters must be included to make an intent statement. 2. Item 3 balconies: this as written is a
concern. This is an encroachment into the setbacks that can be exploited without further definition.
Should the deck encroachment be allowed, guardrails should be transparent to lessen their visual impact.
Decks encroaching into setbacks should be limited to the second floor only. Upper floor setbacks as
indicated in my number 1 above will then have decks that do not enter the setback.
3. Decks at grade encroaching into setbacks shouldn't be allowed. Patios on grade are okay if associated with landscaping requirements. 4. Roof decks: roof decks can work well. Decks should only be within the
middle portions of the building roof footprint. Roof decks should be setback from the roof edges a G
minimum of 5 feet. This will eliminate the ability to see into windows of adjacent buildings. The roof v
0
decks must also have a landscape requirement. 5. Also Item 4, the last sentence "no permanent structures
are allowed within the roof deck area" means there can be no roof deck access. Without access, there can c
be no roof deck. An elevator for disabled people and an exit stair for smaller roof decks are required by a
the building code. Roof decks exceeding 150 square feet require two separate exits. The towers extend the a
building height. This visual effect will be lessened or eliminated with stairs or elevators set to the interior N
portion of the building roof. 6. 1 believe the 22.43.080 standards can work with further thought and LO
definition. The above opinions can be helpful in making the City's design standards work for scale and c
making more interesting building designs for the BD2 zone." Dr. Dotsch thanked the council for their w
consideration of this professional opinion.
m
E
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, requested the council reconsider approval of the agenda, pointing out any
councilmember who voted in favor can make a motion to reconsider. After reconsidering the approval of
the agenda, he requested the council vote to remove item 8.1 from the agenda. RCW 35A.12.130 states a
that no ordinance shall contain more than one subject and that must clearly be expressed its title. The title
to the proposed ordinance on page 78 of tonight's packet clearly contains more than one subject. It is
even comingled with a separate subject, whether or not to continue or cancel a moratorium adopted on
February 15t1i. Council has not yet adopted findings of fact about the February 15t' moratorium, findings
that will either justify continuing the moratorium or canceling the moratorium. He asked why the
proposed moratorium on page 78 of tonight's packet implies what the council will decide to do about the
moratorium; council has not yet heard public comments on the moratorium and he urged the council to
respect citizens and public comments. He asked the council to also request that staff respect the
comprehensive plan and the City code. Table 16.43-1 in the City code establishes all permitted uses for
the entire BD zone which includes five distinct subdistricts.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 3
Packet Pg. 67
7.3.a
Mr. Reidy continued, the BD2 subdistrict is called downtown mixed commercial; the name of the BD2
subdistrict is easily found on page 56 of the 2020 comprehensive plan. For downtown mixed commercial,
the comprehensive plan clearly states to encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be
designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses with
commercial entries at street level. Per the City code, in the BD2 subdistrict, the only way a property can
host 100% residential use is if it is a single family residence. If a property owner opts for multiple
dwelling units, those units must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45 feet from sidewalk or
rights -of -way. The code is easy to understand; there are no transitional areas within BD2 and can be
easily confirmed by searching the code for the word "transitional." He read on Law Insider that adjacent
lots include parcels that are separated only by a private or public street. This includes lots that are across a
public right-of-way from each other. He asked whether any councilmembers had researched this
important topic. The City code uses the word "adjacent."
Mayor Pro Tern Olson described the procedures for virtual audience comments.
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, commenting on the tree ordinance passed last year, said property rights
are one of the most fundamental, constitutional provisions that protect Americans against government
abuse. Unfortunately, these rights are under assault by the City of Edmonds who are aggressively
targeting property owners applying to divide their property and build desperately needed single family
homes. The City's tree ordinance has seized property rights without providing compensation for the loss
and unbelievably is charging owners for the rights to their own property — their trees. In the USA, the
worth and property rights of trees belong to the owners of the land they are growing on unless otherwise
agreed upon. Property rights to 100% of the trees on all single family zoned vacant properties in Edmonds have been seized before divisions or permits are issued. Edmonds then requires payment of $3,000- 3
$12,000 for the right to each of the trees needing removal for homes to be built and illegally retaining G
control of the remaining trees on the property indefinitely with no considerations for gardens, natural light c
or mountain and sound views. New homeowners won't even be allowed to maintain their own trees. This 0
is a gross violation of the U.S. Constitution. c
L
Ms. Ferkingstad continued, the takings clause in the 5th amendment requires if the government seizes Q
property for public use, the owner must be provided just compensation; the opposite has been done here. N
Property owners are being charged and property taken. Constant vigilance is necessary to protect property Ln
owners against any government encroachments on constitutional rights. For this reason, all mayors and c
councilmember publicly swear an oath to protect the constitution of the United States when they take w
office, yet here the Edmonds mayor and council knowingly violated their oath and forced a tree ordinance
that seizes property rights and instead of just compensation, charges owners hundreds of thousands to
restore only partial rights to their property. Mr. Chave stated during a council meeting that only an owner
can voluntarily submit their trees to be protected by the City. Theirs have been taken against their will.
Property owners building needed homes while complying with stormwater, 30% open green space, a
multifamily has a 5%-15% requirement, and thousands of pages of Edmonds code and paying tens of
thousands for permits, are being taken advantage of and abused by the City, harming the community and
electeds' credibility. The mayor and council have shown their willingness to violate the constitution so
which laws can the public trust them to follow? She requested they restore her and her 87-old parents'
property rights and other property owners' rights without the illegal incumbrances they are enforcing so
they may use their property for what it is zoned for, building single family homes.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, said her comments would focus on equity, representation and the development
of the PROS Plan. With regard to equity, she heard councilmembers at last week's meeting express
sadness over the inability to start the marsh project sooner. Great news, the tidal channel can be restored
instead of re -engineering it to drain south through Marina Beach by prioritizing fish over existing
downtown amenities and the concerns of people who own boats. Re -engineering the marsh to purchase
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 4
Packet Pg. 68
7.3.a
and direct fish through a contaminated site and past the dog park is all to avoid restoring the tidal channel.
The avoidance of integrating a tidal channel into the marina is the reason restoration is delayed, the reason
the city seeks to purchase a contaminated site at great cost and risk, the reason the City is looking at
restoration grants instead of far more lucrative infrastructure grants, the reason the City is holding up fish
as a justification for not investing in natural spaces for underserved communities. She suggested
imagining oneself living in an apartment in the northern portion of SR-99, far from any Edmonds park or
open space resource with disproportionate health impacts from a highway whose tax revenue is largely
diverted downtown. The service analysis and public feedback say these should be prioritized for
investment but the city council said it cannot be invested in because a downtown interest group wants to
expand and improve an open space resource against the public feedback and prioritizes the avoidance of
impacts to the marina against health and quality of life.
Ms. Seitz continued, this downtown interest group also says that the purchase of the contaminated site is a
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) issue. Did the City ask the tribes if they would prefer restoration be
delayed to avoid impacts to the marina? Did the City ask the tribes or any other DEI groups to help the
City prioritize environmental investments? Is the City planning to ask them or exclude them from this
closed door process? The lack of historic and CIP identified future open space investment in the most
diverse and underserved areas of the City is the injury. The prioritization of the marina and purchase of a
contaminated site above the service analysis, public feedback and health of underserved communities is
insulting. Claiming that this property acquisition is needed in a well -resources area, the most white census
track in the City as a DEI issue without consulting any DEI groups is a boatload of salt in the wound. She
asked the City to set environmental priorities through a transparent, public process that involves outreach
to all residents including DEI groups. If the City proceeds with the effort to set environmental priorities
behind closed doors, she urged them to consider the significant conflicts of interest that may be present;
do councilmembers stand to benefit from the marina staying intact, have councilmembers acted as agents
of an interest group? The validity of the task force is based on its ability to dispassionately represent all
Edmonds residents. She said her next comments will be regarding fish and the environment.
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Edmonds, relayed concern about the competency of the seventh a
councilmember who again has not made it to the council meeting for possibility the fourth or fifth night in a
a row since the meetings have been in -person. She has done a public records request in the hopes of N
learning the competency level of that councilmember. She thanked Mayor Nelson and his staff for the Ln
work done on the community office on Highway 99, the most fabulous thing in that area in a long time. c
Not only does it make the area feel part of the community, but it also provides assistance to make them w
part of the community. She agreed with Ms. Seitz's comments regarding equity in the PROS Plan and
regarding the tribes; it is clear equity is not there for Highway 99 folks. She thanked Ms. Seitz for E
speaking out about what's occurring [connection lost] people that live in Edmonds along the corridor and
3/4 of a mile on either side of the corridor and they are treated as if they are "just not there." She hoped in
the future the City could move forward in a constructive manner and actually make the people along a
Highway 99 equal to the people who live elsewhere. She offered to work with the City to discuss issues
on Highway 99 in a comprehensive manner. She reiterated her concern that the seventh councilmember
was not attending council meetings which indicated to her that there was an issue with the
councilmember.
6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 29, 2022
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 5
Packet Pg. 69
7.3.a
2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT
Senior Planner Mike Clugston explained the moratorium ordinance was intended to allow staff adequate
time to draft interim zoning regulations for the BD2 zone that would change the required setback for
properties that do not front on a designated street front. A presentation was made at last week's council
meeting regarding the interim standards and council did not take action at that time. The moratorium,
adopted as an emergency ordinance on February 15, 2022, stated a public hearing would be held within
60 days of its adoption and that it would expire by April 15, 2022 unless action was taken. Staff
recommends the council adopt the proposed interim design standards and thereby repeal the moratorium.
The interim standards relate to materials, private amenity space, streetside amenity space and are
narrowly focused on just standalone residential projects in the BD2 zone. The interim standards can be
revisited during the multifamily design standard project coming up later this year that will look more
broadly at multifamily throughout the City.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson opened the public hearing.
Linda Fireman, Edmonds, requested the moratorium be extended indefinitely because she did not Z
believe the code was being applied correctly and that needed to be addressed first. The interim design
standards are very narrow and just provided so that these apartment buildings can go ahead without any
0
further discussion which she did not think was right. Once they are constructed, they will always be there v
and there needs to be a broader and more substantial look at this. Permitted primary uses for B2 c
residential are single family and multifamily dwelling units located on the second floor or behind the first >
45 feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way and it does not reference designated street fronts, therefore the n
ability to have only multifamily development without commercial space is not legal. The narrative states a
that all parcels zoned BD are subject to designated street front requirements in chapter 16.43 and 22.43
ECDC that were adopted in 2007. She has been trying to get documentation, but it has not been N
forthcoming. She thanked Mayor Pro Tem Olson who provided Ordinance 3955 passed by the council on Q
January 21, 2014. She referred to 16.43.020 Uses and Table 16.43-1 Permitted Uses from the website C
w
which are the same. It does not reference designated street fronts so what is stated in the narrative is not
correct.
E
Ms. Fireman continued, the standards are meant to address commercial and mixed use buildings and
require a 45-foot depth ground floor commercial space in building measured from the street property line, a
minimum floor to ceiling heights, etc. However, there are several small areas near the edges of downtown
BD2 mixed commercial zone that are not subject to these requirements and in these locations other types
of buildings could be constructed including multifamily only building. She did not agree with that. The
current permitted uses do not allow this and for some reason if it is allowed, it should be rezoned to RM-
1.5 before planning begins. Interim design standards only cover minor changes written to appease public
complaining about the look and doesn't affect the bulk and mass, the alley or zoning discrepancies. The
city, the mayor, the development department, the planning department and the council are responsible for
zoning and comprehensive plan. This should be done clearly and with care before development is allowed
to proceed. She urged them not to let ambiguous wording and site development standards and design
standards in BD zones take precedence.
John Hoag, Edmonds, member of Economic Development Commission, but speaking as a private
citizen, said he was alarmed by Development Services Director McLaughlin's comment at last week's
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 6
Packet Pg. 70
council meeting regarding the pending BD2 zone moratorium that there is a housing crisis in the region
and inferring that this need takes precedence above every other zoning parameter in the City. That
statement was prejudicial to the discussion. He opposed the changes to the BD2 zone as currently
proposed, not because of the amount of housing, but because of the 100% loss of commercial space. One
current potential development is well within the downtown core and commercial zone; that is why it is
zoned business district. Like the unit lot subdivision proposal a few months ago, there are forces at work
in Edmonds to remove commercial space in ideal commercial locations and predominantly or 100%
replace it with housing. He believed these changes would further erode existing commercial space set
aside for business, business expansion or new business for the City, thus stifling job creation and business
recruitment, and is very short-sighted planning and piecemeal. Mayor Nelson has made climate action one
of the community's priorities; having goods and services within walking and biking distance from
neighborhood districts or hubs can only happen if a certain amount of commercial space is maintained. If
work/live is truly desired in Edmonds, he recommended the City stop prioritizing housing over
commercial space. He could not find anywhere in the City's code in which the BD2 zone, downtown
mixed commercial, allowed 100% multifamily housing; it is a mixed commercial zone and commercial
must be part of any new development.
Greg Brewer, Edmonds, commended the council for hitting the pause button on BD2 commercial
development as there is precious little business space in the downtown core. Previous councilmembers
and planners have lamented over the potential loss of business space in the downtown core. BD2,
downtown mixed commercial, was never meant to be 100% residential. The comprehensive plan states
under economic development goals, page 112 B4, continue to foster and enhance the economic vitality of
downtown Edmonds, including retention of growth of existing businesses, attraction of new businesses
and promotion of appropriate in -fill redevelopment. The existing code supports this. BD2 is defined in the
code as mixed commercial; in chapter 16.43 page 13, item 7, the code clearly states within BD2,
commercial development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses within the designated
street front. Any permitted use may be located on the ground floor outside of the designated street front.
BD commercial mixed use, same chapter, page 3, reads as follows: multiple dwelling units are permitted
with the following stipulation: multiple dwelling units must be located on the second floor or behind first
45 feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way.
N
Mr. Brewer urged the council not to be misled; there is nothing in the code allowing 100% residential Ln
dwellings in the BD2 mixed commercial zone. Unless a building is a single family residence, the code c
clearly states the first 45 feet of the ground floor needs to be commercial. As a citizen, he applauded the w
City's efforts to strengthen design standards and setbacks, but any revisions to the interim code should be
to strengthen BD2 mixed commercial requirement and encourage more open space, modulation and
E
articulation, not diminish or replace current codes. All current and future BD2 commercial mixed use
projects should foster and enhance the economic vitality of downtown Edmonds as stated in the
comprehensive plan. a
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, commented the community has worked hard over the last 42 years that she
has been involved to have a commercial area and to allow residents to live above commercial and she did
not recommend deviating from that now. As a residential real estate broker, she was in favor of housing,
but said it did not have to be in that block of Main Street as there were many opportunities for housing in
other locations. She urged the council to take a serious look at this and not go backwards.
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, asked what legal definition was being used for the BD2 zone in moratorium
ordinance 4247. Page 55 of the comprehensive plan under the 2015 alternatives analysis states, "New
development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall
design objectives and the intent of the various districts described for the downtown area." She referred to
ECDC chapter 16.43, 16.43.010 subdistricts which states, "The downtown business zone is divided into
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 7
Packet Pg. 71
7.3.a
five distinct subdistricts intended to implement specific aspects of the Comprehensive Plan that pertain to
the downtown waterfront activity center. Each subdistrict contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning
regulations as describe in this chapter. The five subdistricts are BD 1 downtown retail core, BD2
downtown mixed commercial, BD3 downtown convenience commercial, BD4 downtown mixed
residential, BD5 downtown arts corridor." She recommended reaffirming the unique intent of the BD2
downtown mixed commercial district on page 56 of the 2020 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
adopted on November 17, 2020. Downtown mixed commercial, to encourage a vibrant downtown, first
floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and
commercial uses with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line.
Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first
floor of the building must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design
guidelines should provide for pedestrian scale design features, differentiating the lower commercial floor
from the upper floors of the building. The design of the interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible
commercial space.
Dr. Dotsch encouraged the council to read the remainder for themselves. If the intent tonight was to
rename pieces of the BD2 downtown mixed commercial subdistrict to BD4 downtown mixed residential,
she asked the council to explain when that was done and where it was documented. If it was spot rezoned
at one point, only those 25+ BD2 lots within the BD2 subdistrict designation in 16.43.010 to a different
intent of development of uses, where can the public find that documentation and was the selective spot
zoning of those 25+ lots legal? She asked that her questions be answered in a transparent manner in front
of the public at this public hearing tonight before any decision was made on what legal definition was
being used for the BD2 zone in moratorium ordinance 4247. If these cannot be answered, she suggested
extending the moratorium up to a possible four months or ask that a new ordinance be drafted for six
months to allow time for a clearly defined and legally agreed upon definition of the BD2 downtown
mixed commercial subdistrict before any current or future building permit application is accepted in this
area.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, asked the council to halt this public hearing; staff has comingled two separate a
subjects and made the following recommendation for the public hearing: adopt the interim design a
standards and repeal the moratorium. Staff s recommendation clearly involves two things; one of the two N
things, adoption of the interim design standards, involves a completely different agenda item that is not Ln
subject to this public hearing. He questioned why the words, proposed interim design standards were c
listed when that was not what this public hearing was about. He questioned how staff could recommend w
repealing the moratorium prior to the city council discussing which findings of fact the council wanted to
adopt on the subject. Tonight's public hearing is supposed to be for city council to adopt findings of fact
on the subject of the February 15t' moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or cancel the �
moratorium. He questioned how citizens are supposed to know how to prepare public comments for this
public hearing when neither the public notice nor agenda packet identified the findings the council will a
consider for adoption related to the moratorium.
Mr. Reidy continued, Ordinance 4247 documents that the purpose of the moratorium was to allow the
City adequate time to draft interim zoning regulations for BD2 that would change the required setback for
properties that do not front on a designated street front. Setback is a very clear legal term and everyone
knows what that is. He requested the council ask whether private amenity space was the legal equivalent
of setback. The situation has been very confusing since the moratorium was passed on February 15t'', prior
to any explanation provided to citizens. How do citizens know how to engage with elected officials in
situations like this? BD2, the downtown mixed commercial subdistrict, does not permit property to be
used as 100% residential. He requested the council halt the public hearing and start over. There are
roughly 10 more days to comply with state law. He requested findings of fact regarding the moratorium
be published and citizens be allowed to comment on whether the moratorium should be continued or
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 8
Packet Pg. 72
7.3.a
canceled. That is what this public hearing should have addressed. He questioned why it was comingled
with a separate subject, interim design standards.
Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, asked council to protect the downtown business district and extend the BD2
moratorium for as long as necessary to allow time for design standards and codes to be examined and
clarified so that citizens, the council, staff and developers understand what is permissible in this important
downtown business zone. As others have cited from the code, BD2 is downtown mixed commercial. The
code for BD2 clearly states multiple dwelling units must be located on the second floor behind first 45
feet from sidewalk or rights -of -way. Therefore, all buildings involving multifamily residential in BD2
must be mixed use and no multifamily only buildings should be considered by the building department.
With this important fact pointed out, the interim design standards for multifamily only buildings proposed
last week by staff are irrelevant for 13132. In the council agenda document, interim design standards for
multifamily only buildings in the 13132 zone, prepared by Michael Clugston of the planning division for
tonight's meeting, clarify that BD2 cannot be multifamily only. Under the narrative on page 2, it refers to
the BD2 zone, "where commercial development is intended to be the primary use," then describes mixed
use as "a building with multiple dwelling units above ground floor commercial" and "a more measured
approach would be appropriate for these transitional 13132 mixed commercial properties."
Ms. Brewer noted there are no transitional BD2 mixed commercial properties and there is nothing in the
code that refers to transitional BD2 properties. As stated in the document, commercial development is
intended to be the primary use of BD2 and commercial is required to be on the ground floor. This is a
clear effort by staff to rezone and she urged council to reject staffs attempt to allow multifamily only
buildings in the BD2 zone by claiming there are transitional properties that do not have to abide by BD2
code. She concluded it is imperative that the City support code that protects business in BD2. If the intent
is a thriving downtown, there needs to be a thriving commercial district. If staff is allowed to convert lots
to 100% residential, valuable commercial space will be lost forever. Instead of converting or rezoning,
businesses in the BD zone need to be maintained, expanded and promoted. She urged the council to
promote business by ensuring staff adhere to the code. She recommended extending the moratorium and
clarifying the design standards and code to ensure what is built is good for the community, not just for the
developer.
N
Finis Tupper, Edmonds, shared his concerns with the interim zoning moratorium for the BD2 zone. The LO
growth management act and local project act clearly require public participation when amending City c
land use plans, development regulations and project review. All parties should be informed, consulted, w
involved and empowered. It is impossible to accomplish these effective procedural requirements in a
closed meeting that is not open to the public. The public cannot understand the council's actions when E
decisions are made privately with just the city attorney and city staff. This interim ordinance created
controversy and distrust because the governing body failed to explain their reasons for passing the motion
or the interim ordinance. It appears to the public that the city council took this action and made a decision a
in a closed meeting, without the public's involvement or participation. There seems to be confusion by the
planning department about what types of development are allowed in the BD2 zone.
Mr. Tupper continued, instead of administering and implementing the zoning ordinances and complying
with the comprehensive plan, staff is requesting changes to those land use plans. Staff s testimony at last
week's meeting is inconsistent with the plain language in the code and in the comprehensive plan. Staff
and the city attorney are missing the legislative intent of the BD zone. He researched the ordinances,
council meeting minutes and agenda packets and did not find that the public and the city council were
informed that the BD zone was a transition zone allowing exclusively multifamily units. Edmonds is
divided into different zone districts, residential, commercial, and industrial for the purposes of
compatibility with surrounding uses and public health, safety and welfare. The BD2 zone restricts
multifamily units to the second floor or behind the first 45 feet of the street frontage of the building. He
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 9
Packet Pg. 73
7.3.a
hoped the council would continue the moratorium and get the public involved as required; the council
does not get to make decisions in closed meetings.
Stephen Cunliffe, Edmonds, said his comments have nothing to do with legality, regulations, or
restrictions so they may go down like a lead balloon in this environment, but they come from the heart
and are prompted by what he and his wife have seen of the architectural drawings proposed for this
development which is pivotal to the discussion. They moved to Edmonds last year after 15 years in Port
Townsend. Port Townsend is distinguished by an integrated community and a great deal of character,
character that is visually expressed by its buildings. They looked for a place to live on the east side of
Puget Sound and decided on Edmonds because of its character and sense of community. If buildings such
as the proposed building are allowed to be constructed close to the downtown, it will contribute to the
destruction of the community's character as expressed in buildings. He questioned why building that
would be perfectly acceptable elsewhere but that did not suit or fit in this area would be allowed. As his
comments were not qualitative, he will rely on the experts to take his input and hopefully make it happen.
Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, commented there was slander and there was HIPPA. She questioned
whether a mayor who broke their legs or a pregnant councilmember who required bedrest would be
kicked off the council. Councilmember K. Johnson is not required to tell anyone her personal business
nor does HIPPA require it. She objected to the comments about Councilmember K. Johnson, equating it
to a Zoom bomb. She supported the person's comments about Highway 99, but not attacking a
councilmember. Mayor Pro Tem Olson interrupted, advising this was a public hearing on the BD zone,
not audience comment.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, said she 100% supports transparent processes and that decisions should not be
made behind closed doors. With regard to zoning and density, the downtown has a 12:1 ratio of parks in G
comparison to SR-99 and south Edmonds. The growth management act would have density decided in c
conjunction with resources, but that is not the historic pattern of the City. Mayor Pro Tem Olson 0
interrupted, advising this was public hearing about the BD zone and the moratorium, not the PROS Plan. c
Ms. Seitz said she was getting to that point. Density needs to be sited in conjunction with resources. The a
moratorium to not allow more density downtown is problematic because of the way the City has sited a
resources. She was fine with whatever design standards the downtown community wants as long as the N
density functionally goes there because that is functionally where all the resources are. Ln
0
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Olson closed the public hearing. w
c
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
E
BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM ON THE BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 UNTIL APRIL 21, 2022.°
Q
Councilmember Tibbott explained this would give council additional time to consider public comments
made tonight and to include those in the design standards the council will consider at a later date. It is
obvious from the comments received tonight and over the last few weeks that the council is not ready to
make a decision on the design standards. He wanted an opportunity to consider the comments before
making a decision so it was appropriate to extend the moratorium.
Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis expressed support for extending the moratorium, although she
preferred to extend it longer. She has all the back data regarding how the BD zones started. She has
always been a strong supporter of the business commercial area, recalling the Roger Brooks days and the
days of having a strong core downtown to promote a gathering place. She has had issues with how this
has played out, such as not recognizing what a true BD zone is. She recommended the council step back
and do its homework because this could have a tremendous impact on the downtown area. Ten small
businesses in the downtown area will be displaced and it will result in density creep. She envisioned the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 10
Packet Pg. 74
7.3.a
same thing happening to another building across the street where there are small businesses. She is a
strong believer in the downtown core and supports working through this properly because the way this
has been handled has been upsetting and emotional for many people and she does not have enough
information to make a decision.
Councilmember Paine said she had envisioned this could be resolved tonight. She asked how long it
would take to complete the multifamily design standards. Development Services Director Susan
McLaughlin answered there is a work plan for the multifamily design standards; the staff person assigned
to that work resigned and the City is recruiting for that position. Ideally that body of work would be
completed by the end of the year. Depending on staff recruitment, a consultant may be used to expedite
the process. Councilmember Paine summarized they would be completed in approximately nine months.
Ms. McLaughlin agreed. Councilmember Paine commented the City cannot have a moratorium because it
is very damaging for development and business and conveys unreliability to developers. She did not
envision adding two weeks would be beneficial when the multifamily design standards for the entire
community to consider and comment on would not be available for nine months. Nine months will be at
the end of the year which is a chaotic time to start something.
Councilmember Paine asked the harm to the practice of development if the council delayed the
moratorium. She recalled the last time there was a moratorium, a developer decided not to do a
multifamily project and instead built three homes which caused a lot of environmental damage in a
different business district. She asked staff to comment on the pros and cons of maintaining a moratorium
or concluding this with the proposed interim standards. Ms. McLaughlin said she could only speculate on
behalf of developers regarding the detrimental effect of a moratorium, but in her professional experience,
developers expect a level of confidence in codes. She realized tonight there was an interpretation issue
and staff would be happy to provide that interpretation, the history and the conclusion. These interim
design standards were proposed not because the use of particular properties was debated, but to ensure
excellence in design standards for solely multifamily buildings, recognizing it was a need. It was
consistent with the comprehensive plan to provide multifamily downtown.
Ms. McLaughlin speculated the longer a moratorium is extended, the less confidence it would seem there a
is from the development community. The recommendation is to extend the moratorium to April 21; staff N
has already done a thorough interpretation and have that information ready to share. That was part of Ln
staffs due diligence for reviewing one of the projects that this is subject to; staff would not have c
proceeded with that project and advancing it to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) if they were not w
confident in its use. If the issue is the use, staff can bring that information forward tonight or next week.
m
E
Councilmember Paine relayed she was on vacation last week, but had watched the video. If there was
information that was not shared last week, she would like to see it. Ms. McLaughlin said Kernen Lien, the
interim planning manager and planner on the 6t' & Main project, did the due diligence for that project in Q
particular but it applies to all BD zones and is relevant to this discussion.
A councilmember raised a point of order. Mayor Pro Tern Olson ruled that the information could be
provided because it was peripherally related to the moratorium.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order, stating the public hearing was related to
extension of the moratorium. The information staff is offering is related to Item 8.1 regarding design
standards. She agreed the staff recommendation regarding this agenda item was incorrect, it should have
been related to whether or not to extend the moratorium. Mayor Pro Tern Olson ruled this is in order
because whether or not multifamily is allowed is relevant to whether the moratorium should be continued
or not.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 11
Packet Pg. 75
7.3.a
Audience members attempted to speak to the council. Mayor Pro Tern Olson said the council is
discussing whether the moratorium for the BD2 related to interim design standards specifically for
multifamily is to be continued or not.
Mr. Lien began his presentation regarding the history of the BD zones, explaining the original BD zone
ordinance was adopted in 2007 and there have been 8 amendments to the BD zones.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson recognized Councilmember K. Johnson who had her hand raised. Councilmember
K. Johnson said her virtual hand was ignored, so she raised her actual hand. Mayor Pro Tern Olson said
she had not been ignored, staff was speaking in response to a question about the relevance of proceeding
with this item. She offered to come back to Councilmember K. Johnson. Councilmember K. Johnson said
the council was off topic as they should be speaking to the motion.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson asked for ruling from one of the parliamentarian whether the information from
staff was germane and appropriate. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said it was his understanding that one of
the reasons the council was interested in a possible extension of the moratorium was to determine whether
the use issues raised at the hearing needed to be resolved as part of this interim zoning ordinance or
whether the use issues did not need to be resolved now. It would seem in order for the council to
determine whether there is a use issue as addressed by the public that warrants an extension of the
moratorium, the council may want to hear from staff regarding their interpretation of the zoning
ordinance. Council does not have to agree with staff but they may want to at least listen to staff. He
concluded hearing staff s understanding of the use issues would be relevant to determining to what extent
an extension of the moratorium is necessary.
Mr. Lien continued his presentation, advising three of the BD ordinances (shaded below) were relevant to
the discussion regarding multifamily use in the BD2 zone:
• BD Ordinance History
o Ord. 3624 -Original BD Zone Adoption (Jan 2007)
o Ord. 3700 -First Designated Street Front (Nov 2008)
o Ord. 3865 -Revised Designated Street Front (Dec 2011)
o Ord. 3894 -Interim Ord. for Farmers Markets (Sep 2012)
o Ord. 3902 -Food Trucks (Sep 2012)
o Ord. 3918 -Design Standards and Building Step back (Apr 2013)
o Ord. 3932 -Farmers Markets (July 2013)
o Ord. 3955 -BD1 GFSF (Jan 2014)
o Ord. 4190 -Parking (Feb 2019)
• Map of Pre BD Zoning - downtown was all BC
• Map of 5 BD Zones
• Designated Street Front
o Ord. 3700 -BD1 Zone 30-foot Depth
■ Map only applied to BD 1 zone
■ BD1 zone designated street front 30-feet in depth
■ Zoning text -"for all other BD zones the designated street front is established as the first
60 feet of the lot measured perpendicular to any street right-of-way, excluding alleys."
o Ord. 3865 -Revised 2011
■ Designated street front mapped for all BD zones
■ 45 feet from mapped designated street front
■ Reviewed by Planning Board and Economic Development Commission
- "The purpose of the map is to clarify where the primary pedestrian areas and
commercial uses are intended to be oriented within the BD Zones." (Rob Chave, PB
Public Hearing, 2011.06.08)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 12
Packet Pg. 76
7.3.a
- "He reminded the Board that multi -family residential and professional offices would
be allowed to locate on the portions of ground floor space located outside of the
designated street front areas and on the upper floors of all building in the BD zones."
(Rob Chave, PB Public Hearing, 2011.06.08)
Residential Use - BD1 GFSF
o Revisions to the BD1 uses under Ord. 3955 where lead by Stephen Clifton (former Economic
Development Director)
o Focus was on clarifying uses allowed within the BD1 Ground Floor Store Front
o The MF restriction in the use table was supposed to be a footnote:
■ Excerpt from PB Minutes 09/11/2013: Board Member Lovell requested an explanation of
how the proposal would impact a property owner's ability to provide multi -family
residential uses. Mr. Clifton answered that residential uses would not be allowed within
the areas designated as BD1 GFSF. However, residential uses would be allowed behind
the 45-foot street front spaces and in the upper floors. Mr. Chave suggested that it might
be helpful to add a reference in the footnote to the applicable chapter in the code to
provide more clarity.
■ Rather than a footnote, that clarification was added to the use table, but the intent was
that it only applied to the BD1 zone
Mr. Lien said when working through the entirety of the BD zones, it is clear that commercial area is only
applied to the designated street front. All the discussion about the commercial ground floor and 45 feet is
in regard to that designated street front map. That is how staff reached the interpretation that an entirely
multifamily building could be located in the BD2 zone outside of the designated street front.
Councilmember Paine thanked staff for that clarification, relaying it was good to hear the history. She
observed the last time this was discussed was 9 years ago in 2013. Having worked with some community
groups who pay close attention to the BD1 and all the business district zoning, she was very familiar with
the BD1 restrictions but it was good to have the historical context.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the history as it provided him knowledge for making a a
decision. Based on this interpretation, he asked the definition for today's BD2 code, whether or not it N
allowed residential. Mr. Lien answered it could be residential only outside the designated street front. o
0
Mayor Pro Tem Olson referred to staff's indication that Ordinance 3955 was for BD1 only, but the other W
BD zones preexisted this ordinance so when it said BD1 that was not the only BD zone. Mr. Lien c
answered the revisions in Ordinance 3955 were focused on the BD1 retail only and the intent of the E
ordinance was to clarify the retail uses allowed in the BD 1 zone because the uses in the table weren't
clear. He referred to the use table in 16.43.030 where a new column was added with this ordinance and
several new uses listed to clarify retail uses that were allowed in the downtown retail core, the BD1 zone. a
In reading the description of Ordinance 3955, it is clear the focus was only on BD1 zone.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson said in just reading the code and not having all the background available, it was
very reasonable for people to reach the conclusion they did and she had a difficult time getting over that
interpretation. She asked how many times staff has approved projects that follow this interpretation of
multifamily allowed on the bottom floor on undesignated street fronts. Mr. Lien answered two building
have been constructed with residential uses within an undesignated street front; one building was
multifamily only at the corner of 3' & Edmonds within the BD2 zone where there is no designated street
front and the other was phase 1 of the post office site. For the building where the post office is located,
the designated street front went halfway down the block from Main Street. Where the post office is
located is a designated street front and there is commercial on the first floor; the other half of the building,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 13
Packet Pg. 77
7.3.a
north of the post office, is all residential on the ground floor because it is outside the designated street
front. Those are the only two projects outside the designated street fronts since the BD code was adopted.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson said as someone who goes to DEMA and Chamber meetings, it seems that
everybody is always looking for more commercial space. This was concerning to her especially when
other people may look at the code and see that it is not allowed and may not be pursuing those things. She
concluded it was another reason for extending the moratorium for two weeks, to give the council time to
digest that.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO
TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM TO MAY 17, 2022.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she feels additional time is needed and two weeks may not be sufficient.
There seems to be real confusion by the public and perhaps by council about what is a designated street
front, whether it applies to this application and what conditions the council needs to consider changing to
make the BD2 code more palatable.
m
Councilmember L. Johnson said given the explanation provided by staff showing how multifamily only is
allowed and given that there is a moratorium based on an emergency situation and to allow staff time to
create interim design standards to address gaps in codes that apply to sites, it appears staff has provided a
interim design standards and explained how it came about that multifamily only is allowed in certain
portions of the BD2 zone outside the designated street front map. She was challenged with determining
how this would be considered an emergency to continue the moratorium as it appears the reasons that the
council initially adopted the moratorium have been satisfied. Mr. Taraday answered he agreed with the c
analysis that Mr. Lien provided in terms of how to interpret the existing zoning code, but wanted to 0
underscore a couple of the points Mr. Lien made to ensure the council digests them. It would be a v
roundabout way of answering Councilmember L. Johnson's question. 0
0
Mr. Taraday continued, from the adoption of Ordinance 3700 until the adoption of Ordinance 3865, a four n
year period from 2008 to 2011, an entirely residential building could not have been allowed anywhere in a
the BD2 zone. In 2011 when Ordinance 3865 was adopted, a revision was made to the definition of
N
designated street front. The map is expanded but the effect is to leave small pockets of the BD zone where ,N
there is no designated street front. It used to be there was designated street front everywhere in the BD
zone due to the text. With the map amendment, it looks like it is being expanded because the map gets w
bigger, but because of the text change, the actual effect is to remove the designated street front from
certain portions of the BD zone. The effect of Ordinance 3865 is there can be entirely residential m
buildings in pockets of the BD zone that do not have a designated street front. That was the case without a
doubt from 2011 until 2014 when Ordinance 3955 was adopted. He understood that the way the table was 0
developed in Ordinance 3955 created some confusion. Q
Mr. Taraday agreed with Mr. Lien when looking at the totality of code and the totality of the ordinances
that it does not appear that when the city council adopted Ordinance 3955 in 2014 that it intended to undo
the change made in 2011. There was no discussion of that, there is no mention of it in the whereas
clauses; it seems to have been entirely focused on BD uses. In response to Councilmember L. Johnson's
question about whether to extend the moratorium, he said there is potentially some value in a short
extension because he had not had enough time to research whether the council understood in 2011 that
there would be pockets where an entirely residential structure would be allowed and whether it was
intended or was it an unintended consequence of the text change. That is relevant because in the same
way that the design standards staff prepared were intended to fix an unintended consequence of the code,
if it appears after studying the minutes, video and discussion that it was an unintended consequence of
Ordinance 3865, the council could justify taking a crack at fixing that unintended consequence in the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 14
Packet Pg. 78
7.3.a
same way it was fixing the design standards because the design standards did not apply to an entirely
residential structure.
Mr. Taraday continued, Mr. Lien did a great job explaining it tonight, but with an additional two weeks
staff could put it in writing for the public to review and understand and there might be more information
about what was really known and intended with Ordinance 3865. He acknowledged that after doing all
this additional research, staff may return and say there wasn't discussion about the pockets of BD that do
not have designated street fronts and the ramifications of that and then the council would need to decide
what to do about that. He hoped this information was helpful to explain why a short extension of the
moratorium would be appropriate. He did not think staff needed until May 17', that was more time than
staff needed to put this explanation together in comprehensive way.
Councilmember L. Johnson clarified that given the information provided, it rises to the level justifying the
emergency definition to continue it until April 22"d. Mr. Taraday answered yes, because depending on
what the additional research reveals, it is possible the council could be justified in doing something that
addresses this designated street front situation.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis said she just received all this information which should have been
in the packet. Ordinance 3918, amending chapter 16.43 and 22.43 ECDC relating to the development
relationship and design standards for downtown business zones, actually explains the zones and
subdistricts: BD1 downtown retail, BD2 downtown mixed commercial, BD3 downtown convenience
commercial, BD4 downtown mixed residential and BD5 downtown arts corridor and defines each BD
zone. She has at least four other ordinances and did not know where this fits with the three that were
highlighted. She believed more time was needed because in reading Ordinance 3918 which has not been
rescinded, there is no way it is legal to have an apartment complex in a BD2 zone. There are other
ordinances that are not being addressed such as Ordinance 3628.
Councilmember Paine said after hearing all the background, once further research was done by the city c
attorney and all the BD ordinance history was provided, she felt it was premature to extend the a
moratorium to May and that two weeks would be more than adequate. She was not in favor of extending a
the moratorium to May. N
N
Ln
Councilmember Chen relayed staff said two weeks was enough time to develop the documented c
explanation so the public and the council can have a better understanding of this issue. He preferred to w
extend the moratorium to April 215Y and revisit it if necessary.
m
E
Mayor Pro Tern Olson commented moratoriums have serious business impacts and because there is no
certainty that more than a two week extension is necessary, she will vote no on the amendment and
support the original two week extension. a
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN,
TIBBOTT, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING NO.
Mr. Taraday restated the motion:
TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE HE CIRCULATED BEFORE THE MEETING, THE TITLE IS:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE
MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2
ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY
ORDINANCE 4247.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed that was the intent of his motion.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 15
Packet Pg. 79
7.3.a
Councilmember K. Johnson asked if the intent was to extend the moratorium to Tuesday, April 19t' or
Thursday, April 215t. Mr. Taraday said the ordinance states April 21'. He did that intentionally not
knowing what may be on the April 19t1' agenda, and he wanted to provide additional time in the event the
council needed to adjourn meeting to another night that week to finish its business.
MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE
BD2 ZONE
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order, stating this should not have been as part of
the agenda due to extending the moratorium. Mayor Pro Tern Olson said it was relevant because the
council may want to give input to staff for further work in order to move quickly past moratorium. Mr.
Taraday agreed from a parliamentary standpoint, it was not out of order. It is on the agenda and with only
a short extension of the moratorium, it would be helpful for staff to receive feedback from the council
sooner rather than later. Mayor Pro Tern Olson suggested limiting the discussion to feedback regarding
how it could be improved.
Senior Planner Mike Clugston offered to provide last week's PPT again or just proceed to council
discussion/questions.
Councilmember L. Johnson said given the information the council heard earlier, it would be beneficial to
have a shortened presentation.
Mr. Clugston reviewed Interim Design Standards of Stand-alone multifamily building in BD2 zone,
explaining the intent of the interim design standards was to apply them to the parcels on the edge of the
BD2 zone outlined in red on the map that do not have a designated street front:
!• Designated Street Front* -
v
h�3 9T EY Sz DALEY ]ST
802
ST
BELL ST
aoa
802
eoi I
❑nrro
L
x
T
MAPLE ST
ry
ALDER Si
4
a
r�
A -
^
ALDER 5T
E rT
WALNUT gY
WALNUT S
i
t
80,
Nd LL WAY
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 16
Packet Pg. 80
7.3.a
Standards are intended to apply to two situations
1. Property is adjacent to R-zoned property, and/or
2. Property is adjacent to other BD2 property
Proposed design standards
o Materials
■ Benefits
- Breaks up massing; strengthens identity
- Preferred exterior materials: natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass
- Manmade okay if made to look like preferred
- Photos of projects using more traditional building materials
o Street -side amenity space
■ Benefits
- Results in setback to the street to serve as amenity space
- Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience
- Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity
■ Plan view - Street -side Amenity Space N
- 5% of lot area must be provided +;
- Shall be between building and sidewalk only and open to sky
- Must include landscaping, seating, art, etc.
■ Section Cut - Street Facing
- Street -side amenity space area excludes any private amenity space area that is
provided at the front of the building
- Canopy/awnings required and does not impact amount of street -side amenity area
o Private amenity space
■ Benefits 0
- Improves livability for smaller residential units c
- Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to align with building
character, orientation and style c
- Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the facade and increases a
`eyes on the street' thereby improving safety Q
■ Plan View - Private Amenity Space N
- 10% project area o
- Balconies, decks, patios, yards c
- Together with a dwelling unit or grouped for resident use w
- If with individual units, > 40 sf
- 50% of required area can be achieved with a roof top deck E
■ Section Cut - Adjacent Property
- Balconies can project 5' into setback from R-zone property
- Decks and patios 10' a
Councilmember Paine said she did not have any trouble with most of the interim design standards, but
wanted to understand the impact of removing CA, "A maximum of 50% of the required private amenity
space may be provided as roof top deck. Deck railings may...". Mr. Clugston answered it would limit the
ability of designers to provide private amenity space. They could probably do it in other ways such as a
recessed balcony. The intent is to use the roof top as a gathering space for residents. Similar features are
allowed to exceed the height in all zones such as elevator penthouses, chimneys, etc. This is an example
of what could be on a roof top in a dense downtown area.
Councilmember Paine said amenity space that was not on the roof would provide articulation and
modulation on the building sides so it wasn't a giant mass and such a square. Grooves provide sightlines,
a square does not. Having a roof top deck seems to shift that visual so it is not really community friendly.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 17
Packet Pg. 81
7.3.a
Mr. Clugston said that is an option; other zones in Edmonds such as the General Commercial and
Westgate Mixed Use allow roof top decks. Councilmember Paine said she was open to considering it in
the multifamily design standards that will have a public process, but preferred to have the standards be
tighter now and be more generous when there was a public process.
Ms. McLaughlin said she could understand what Councilmember Paine was saying about having it be
part of the required private amenity space and asked if she would be opposed to allowing roof top amenity
space after they had met their standards. For instance, if the developer already met their private amenity
space per the interim design standards and chose to do a roof top deck, would that be allowed.
Councilmember Paine said she do not know how she felt about that, she has the square in her head. Ms.
McLaughlin said that would be solved via the private amenity space; it was her understanding
Councilmember Paine did not want the roof top deck to count toward that because she wanted further
articulation. She could see that point of view but wanted to clear whether the desire was to prohibit roof
top decks. Councilmember Paine said visual examples would be helpful. She hoped to avoid a block with
people partying on top of the building.
Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with idea of maintaining the private amenity space and once that has
been met, whether there is a roof top deck is inconsequential to the design standard.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis agreed with Councilmembers Paine and K. Johnson. She did not
want people hanging out on decks, hanging over and looking and waving at people down on Main Street.
There is nothing in the code that says decks on a roof top are considered open space. She wanted to be
conscientious of that and not turn into Seattle where people hang out on decks waving at everybody —
walking by. She referred to a statement last week that a traffic analysis had been done, but now staff
indicates no traffic analysis had been done and that it would come later. Ms. McLaughlin said at the last G
council meeting there was a question regarding the project development process for this particular project, c
specifically what types of studies are requested during project review and a traffic study was one of the
cc
questions. Traffic is typically evaluated in any project; in this project, which is not the subject of tonight's c
review, the traffic analysis yielded less than 25 PM peak hour trips. When a preliminary traffic analysis a
results in less than 25 PM peak hour trips, a full traffic study is not required because the impacts per hour a
on the street network are negligible. N
N
Ln
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis questioned 25 peak hour trips with the addition of at least 24 cars. c
Ms. McLaughlin answered international transportation engineering guidelines guide trip generation w
analysis. Public Works leads this process and the engineering team can provide more detail. It is a very
standardized methodology for determining peak hour trips in different types of land use. E
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to Ordinance 3918 which is very explanatory about the
design standards in BD zones but doesn't say anything about roof top decks. Mr. Clugston said he would a
need to look at the code and report back. Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis asked if staff had spoken
to the developer regarding mixed use versus fully residential since it is in a BD2 zone. Mr. Clugston
answered this is a discussion on interim design standards for buildings in the BD2 zone.
Councilmember Chen referred to an area outlined in red south of Main and east of 6t' on the map of
designated street fronts and areas without designated street fronts. He asked if the Bellmont Building at
600 Bell was in the BD2 zone. Mr. Clugston answered that is in a multifamily zone.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked about the design standards and allowances for roof top decks or if the
interim standards were allowing something that did not currently exist. She preferred to have that go
through the more lengthy process with the overall multifamily design standards. She was concerned with
adding something like that through these interim design standards if it did not already exist.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 18
Packet Pg. 82
7.3.a
Councilmember Tibbott said he was interested in the purpose of transition zones. There are very intensive
uses in BD1, less intensive uses in BD3 and BD2 seems to be somewhat of a transition between those
two. He asked the purpose of a transition zone and what the difference would be between mixed use and a
mix of uses in BD2. Ms. McLaughlin answered the term transition zone is something that has used in
staff s presentations. As the public mentioned, it is not found in the zoning code. In her professional
judgment, transitional zones are meant to taper out the intensity of a mix of uses that are often found in a
downtown core. It affords a larger variety for developers to choose from with regard to market demand.
There is a typology that is more suited to a higher density retail core for in downtown core for mixed use
buildings. With regard to a mix of uses, tapering away from the retail core, it allows for a variety of uses
that still support, as stated in the comprehensive plan, the intensity that happens in the core and supports
the retail and commercial uses by providing residences and other uses that help keep that space lively and
vibrant.
Councilmember Tibbott referred to the photographs on packet page 107 of the North Sound Center and
the post office building that have modulation and articulation in the rooflines and the sides. He asked staff
to address how the articulation and design features help with good design for the City. Mr. Clugston said
these buildings illustrate human scale. The lower buildings on Main Street are only 15' tall so they
definitely have human scale but the Starbucks building on the corner and the post office buildings are
definitely not monolithic blocks, they have elements that provide modulation, different eaves, etc. The
Graphite building also has a lot going on and even on the North Sound building, there is modulation using
colors, materials and windows to create human scale.
Councilmember Tibbott said the proposed interim design standards for BD2 would be in line with this
kind of modulation and natural materials and would help tie all the BD zones to downtown. Mr. Clugston
agreed that was the intent. Ms. McLaughlin advised the proposed interim design standards would be used
in combination with the existing design standards that talk about mimicking historic patterns, human
scale, etc. and would not be used in isolation. The whole package of applicable design standards are in the
council packet.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson said if a roof top deck was included, she agreed it should be recessed from the N
edge so people could not look into windows on surrounding buildings, that was good input from the Ln
architect during the public hearing. She will listen to that public comment again to ensure she considered c
everything that was mentioned. She encouraged staff to consider that comment and other comments from w
the public. If councilmembers objected to the idea of a roof top deck, she suggested perhaps it could be
allowed with a conditional use permit so the surrounding residents could weigh in.
Councilmember Tibbott said it was clear from the council's discussion that clearer design standards were
needed for a roof top deck. He asked what happened if a design was proposed that did not meet the design a
standards. Mr. Clugston said the developer would be sent back to the drawing board. Councilmember
Tibbott asked if the proposal would be denied. Mr. Clugston said when staff or the ADB is reviewing a
project, the goal is not to deny but to get them to something that is code compliant that also meets the
design guidance in the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Tibbott summarized they would need to
meet the design standards before it was approved for construction. Mr. Clugston answered yes, or before
it was conditionally approved.
2. 2022 PROS PLAN DRAFT REVISION PROPOSAL
Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Human Services Director Angie Feser said the final draft PROS Plan
is currently under council consideration for approval. After robust public engagement and considerable
public comment since the January 7t' draft release, the plan is in its last stage of council review and
revision. Usually in this phase council has the option of approving the final draft as recommended by the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 19
Packet Pg. 83
7.3.a
Planning Board or make revisions to the final draft. At the conclusion of the public hearing on March
221, council asked staff for a proposal to incorporate a wide range of revision considerations requested by
the council. Tonight is a presentation on that proposal.
The current proposal developed by working with council leadership is to form a 2-3 person council task
force consisting of councilmembers, staff and the consultant to work through the council comments,
group them by subject matter, and determine how to incorporate them in the PROS Plan. She envisioned
1-2 meetings involving herself, the consultant and the councilmembers. She gathered all the comments
including those made at the last council meeting and emails sent since then and those would be presented
to the task force to work through as a group. The revisions would be brought back to the council through
a public process in a revision table similar to the one created for the comments at the Planning Board.
During that process, the Planning Board responded to about 100 comment to the PROS Plan; the table
showed how the comments were grouped by subject matter and addressed in the PROS Plan with
revisions shown in red edits. The public would have an opportunity to see and comment on the revisions.
The consultant's original scope of work has been completed; the additional work with the task force is
estimated to cost an additional $6800-$8000 depending on time and scope.
Ms. Feser said another option that was not included in the packet but that has been discussed during in the
last couple days is for staff and the consultant to gather comments made by council and come back to
council with the proposed changes without using a task force. That would shorten the time period, reduce
the consultant's fee considerable. That is the typical, traditional option.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson observed it would cost less for the consultant to work on it without a task force.
Ms. Feser said she has all the comments from the last meeting and various emails and would work with
the consultant and bring those forward in a very transparent manner, such as the revision table that was
done for the Planning Board to show the proposed changes.
Councilmember Tibbott assumed if staff were to bring back the revisions, they would include the gaps c
that have been identified over the last couple months and the council could then approve or reject the a
revisions. He said that sounded like an expedient way to move forward. Ms. Feser said a table of the a
revisions could be created and the council could approve/not approve each one or make further revisions N
to what is proposed. Ln
0
Councilmember Paine said however the process proceeds, it needs to be transparent. There has been a lot w
of public input and the outreach was remarkably well done with a lot of input through various
methodologies and it is statically significant. She said anything "that goes through this little black box" E
could possibly undo all that transparency and equity that occurred during the PROS Plan process. She
requested whatever happens, it not go into a dark hole without the public. If the council proceeds with
option 2 with the director and consultant working on it, that typically would not need to be publicized. If a
it was councilmembers, the director and consultant, it could be available via Zoom so it was visible to the
public so there would be some level of transparency. Her biggest concern was undoing all the great equity
and transparency that was done over the last several months.
Councilmember K. Johnson presented a third option; Ms. Feser indicated she has summarized all the
comments that came in through the planning board process and planned to summarize the council
comments, but in addition there were additional oral and written public comments as well as comments at
the public hearing. She suggested including all the comments that came in after the planning board during
the council process as well as the city council's comments. Ms. Feser agreed it would be appropriate to
create a document that includes all the comments made between the planning board and council
presentation.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 20
Packet Pg. 84
7.3.a
Councilmember Chen agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson about including verbal and written
comments as well as the council's input. He preferred to have staff and the consultant compile the
amendments and bring it back to council. That would be less time consuming, less costly and more
transparent.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis agreed it would be best if Ms. Feser worked with the consultant.
She asked if the amendments would include the addition of an implementation chapter. Many people have
repeated themselves weekly so in her opinion staff has enough information. She observed the survey is
one component of the PROS Plan; the reason so many environmental and nearshore estuary issues were
raised was because that was not addressed in the survey. She wanted to ensure there was an
implementation chapter to assist with grant writing, noting the City just received over $20 million for
Highway 99. She summarized it will be an open and transparent process, and no one's comments will be
diluted. Council is available to help and she preferred the traditional method.
With regard to comments after the public outreach process, Councilmember L. Johnson said the majority
of those comments have been provided at council meetings or emailed. Not everyone is comfortable
attending meetings or organized enough to submit their comments. If people still want to submit
comments, she asked where they should be sent and what was the deadline. She asked if there would be
any outreach for addition comments. Ms. Feser said there is a specific email for comments on the PROS
Plan, prosplankEdmondswa.gov. A schedule will be established and distributed including the mailing list
of individuals involved with the process who requested to be on a notification email list, the typical
avenues such as social media as well as other avenues to get the word out. The council packet is available
the Friday before council meetings which provides an opportunity for the public to review materials and
comment via email to the council and/or staff or at council meetings, Part of reason the packets related to
the PROS Plan have been so large is because all the comments have been included. That has been the
practice and staff will continue collecting them up to the publication of the packet.
Councilmember L. Johnson said it takes a certain amount of availability and know how to do this. Going
out again and opening the opportunity for comment risks diluting the detailed, expansive and statistically
significant outreach. She was hoping there was a good way to balance that with the comments that are
still being submitted.
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
BUCKSHNIS, TO USE OPTION 2 THAT WAS PRESENTED THIS EVENING. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson proposed a 5 minute break and to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. because the meeting
started late. Mr. Taraday recommended a motion to extend before the break.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO
EXTEND TO 10:30. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson declared a 5 minute recess at 9:55 p.m.
3. RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENTS INTRODUCTION
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed:
0 Changing concept of Family
o What is a family?
■ Changes across time and cultures
■ Traditionally two or more people related by blood and marriage
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 21
Packet Pg. 85
N
N
Ln
0
0
w
c
m
E
0
2
Q
7.3.a
■ Modern families include single parent households, foster families, same -sex couples,
child free families and many variations of the traditional norms
■ Some people do not grow up with the family of orientation but become part of a
stepfamily or blended family
■ Updated definitions of family provide a more realistic and inclusive definition of family
SB 5235
0 2021 State Legislation
o Prohibits local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home
o Exceptions for short-term rentals, Building Code occupancy loads, some group homes
o Also addressed owner occupancy requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (Governor
Vetoed Section)
Conflicting Edmonds Community Development Code
o Definition of Family -ECDC 21.30.010
A. Family means individuals consisting of two or more persons related by genetics,
adoption, or marriage, or a group of five or fewer persons who are not related by
genetics, adoption, or marriage and none of whom are wards of the court unless such
wards are related by genetics, adoption, or marriage to all of the members of such group
living in a dwelling unit.
D. Calculation of Residents
1. When one or more unrelated persons reside with a family whose members are related
by genetics, adoption or marriage, the total number of residents shall not exceed five
persons except as provided in subsection (D)(2) of this section.
2. A family unit consisting entirely of persons related by genetics, adoption or marriage
may rent a room to a total of two additional renters, or up to two students as a part of
a recognized foreign exchange program
U
Proposed Code Amendments c
o Removes Residential Occupancy Limits per State Legislation
o Strengthens Structural / Element requirements for Single Family Dwellings (One Water, Gas 0-
and Electric Meter ... Common Access to Rooms) a
o Maintains Limits on Number of Dwellings in Single Family Zoning Q
o Maintains Restrictions on Group Homes N
o Definition of Family - 21.30.010 0
■ Removes occupancy limitation c
Family means individuals related or unrelated by w
geneties, adoption, or- gr-attp of five or- fewer- per -sons who are not related
E
living in a dwelling unit.
■ Removed subsection to calculate occupancy limits (Sub D) a
■ Maintains subsections on Group Living (Sub B) and Exclusions from Family Definition
(Sub C)
■ Maintains provisions limiting rental of ADU to either primary house or ADU
■ Maintains provision allowing normal hosting activities (guests and visitors)
o Dwelling Unit Definitions
■ 21.90.080 Single-family dwelling unit
- Strengthens and adds criteria for definition
- Maintains requirement for one family and one dwelling unit per lot
- Adds requirement to:
• Be limited to one mailbox, water meter, gas meter and electric meter (Properties
with an approved ADU may have an additional mailbox)
Have common access to common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 22
Packet Pg. 86
7.3.a
■ 21.20.050 Dwelling unit
- Strengthens and aligns better with State's definition
- Add portion that state it includes permanent provisions ,for living, sleeping, eating,
cooking and sanitation.
o Chapter 20.21 ECDC - ADU
■ 20.21.030 Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units.
D. Add one gas meter and provision for an addition mailbox
F. Occupancy
- Removes occupancy limits and exceptions for nurses and caregivers
- Maintains owner occupancy requirements
■ 20.21.020 Density limitation -Limitation on the total occupancy
o Removes reference to the exceptions listed in 20.21.030
o Maintains the density limits for ADUs
Next Steps
o Public hearing
o Adoption following public hearing
Councilmember Tibbott said the planning board had this discussion when he was on the board ages ago.
He recalled the same question, what is a family, and was glad that finally some changes have been made
and he was not surprised this was coming to council at this point. He asked if a single family residence
with two kitchens with people living on multiple floors was still a single family residence. Mr. Lien said
two kitchens in houses is becoming more common, particularly in larger houses. The question is whether
they are two separate living areas or if there is common access to the areas. As long as there is common
access throughout the house, it is still single family. Councilmember Tibbott asked about a locked door
between the first and second floors. Mr. Lien said then it would not have common access and it was not
single family.
Councilmember Paine said she encountered the definition of family in an HOA code, relaying her 'o
understanding this would not affect HOAs in the community. Mr. Lien answered this change applied to a
how family is defined in the City code and zoning code. CC&RS could have additional restrictions about a
who is allowed to live in homes, but that is not affected by this.
N
Ln
Councilmember Chen said this may sound funny but it is a serious question. The language does not c
exclude animals and he asked if dogs or cats were considered family. Mr. Lien said other sections of the W
code limit the number of domestic animals; he recalled five domestic animals were allowed in single c
family zones. While many people think of their pets as family, they are not included in this definition. E
Councilmember L. Johnson assumed the reason for doing this was to not be discriminatory regarding
what defines a family. If that was the case, she asked why the City would allow HOAs to be a
discriminatory regarding what defines a family. That has been done in the past and she questioned why
the City would allow it to continue. Mr. Lien referred to senior living 55 and older communities that can
be located in single family zones but have private restrictions on residents. There are a lot of CC&RS in
the City, the City is involved with compliance with zoning; if they are more restrictive, they are enforced
by the HOA.
City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the legislature clearly told cities what they cannot do but did not take the
next step to regarding how HOAs define a family. One is a regulation of a private entity and the other is
what a city does with its police power. The question is whether the city can use its police power to do
what the legislature did not do, prohibit that type of private regulation through an HOA. He would need
research that if it was something the council was interested in pursuing. In general, the City does not place
restrictions on what HOAs can do via their neighborhood restrictions. The City has laws that apply
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 23
Packet Pg. 87
7.3.a
citywide but do not generally target HOA with special focus. That was not to say that the City can't, but
he was not certain. Councilmember L. Johnson said it deserves more thought; in the past HOAs have
discriminated based on race, gender, etc. and there is a reason the state did this. She acknowledged there
were certain things the City would not want to tell HOAs that they could/could not do, but if an HOA
allowed a family of 3-4 related people but not 3-4 unrelated people, that could be discriminatory. She
reiterated there is a reason the state did this and it was worth additional conversation.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked if having a public hearing needed to be voted on by council. Mr. Lien said
code amendments require a public hearing and the date needs to provide enough time for notice. He can
work with Mayor Pro Tem Olson on the schedule.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO
HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENTS.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS TO ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES
Mayor Pro Tem Olson requested City Clerk Scott Passey provide an quick introduction, noting there have
been some emails submitted with questions.
Mr. Passey said he had more than a couple minute of introduction. There is a lot of information and he did
not want to give this item short shrift because it has been in the works for literally years. This proposal
was developed prior to COVID and then the idea of special events became rather superfluous given other
priorities that arose. He introduced this to the PSPP committee last September and they recommended a
presentation to full council. He explained the City has administered a special event permit program for
many years, however, there is no adopted City code that outlines the process or criteria governing the
issuance of special event permits.
Mr. Passey continued, the intent of this proposal is to codify the process for permitting special events that n
impact City right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services. These special events enhance
the community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of venues for expression and a
entertainment that are not normally provided as part of government services. A new chapter is proposed cm
to Title 4, Chapter 4.100, special event permits, that will provide a clear and efficient process for Q
permitting special events within the City. Mr. Passey said he has a lot more information. w
Mayor Pro Tem Olson said she want to have this introduced and encouraged councilmembers to review E
the information and contact Mr. Passey with any questions so when it comes back, the council is prepared
to take action or not.
Q
Councilmember Paine suggested scheduling this sooner rather than later as it has been on the schedule for
some time. She noted there may be time on April 26t1'. There are a lot of summer events, and it would be
helpful to have this codified and announced in advance. Mayor Pro Tem Olson shared that prioritization
and assured it would be scheduled as soon as possible.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Olson felt strongly she needed to make this statement based on repetitive comments by
the audience regarding the use of the hybrid option. "This city council voted unanimously to conduct our
meetings in a hybrid format. This had something to do with continuing uncertainties related to COVID
and something to do with feeling that hybrid is the way of future and that we may as well just get on
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 24
Packet Pg. 88
board. This unanimous decision to go hybrid makes participation full participation whether a
councilmember is here in chambers or on Zoom. As such, I want to make sure the public is aware that the
councilmember participating on Zoom is serving you fully. In fact if you really want to see her in action
at her best, I recommend you watch the Parks & Public Works Committee meeting next Tuesday, April
12t', 7:30 — 9:30 pm."
Councilmember L. Johnson announced the state passed a transportation bill, Move Ahead Washington,
and Edmonds received $22.5 million for the Highway 99 revitalization project. She thanked everyone
involved in that, noting it is an area that really needs focus and dedication and the funds will go a long
way toward that.
Councilmember Paine commented this has been an interesting meeting and she liked having these topics
come up. She hoped the council could get through things more quickly and was interested in finding
additional things to cover as a council. There are a lot of things on the to-do list and it would be great to
start looking at them. She looked forward to a productive spring and summer.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis thanked Mayor Pro Tern Olson for her comments about hybrid
meetings. She recalled the late great Peggy Olson who attended meeting and was unable to speak.
Everyone needs to realize that councilmembers have their unique way of expressing their opinion either
on Zoom or on the dais. She thanked the people who continue to call, text, and email her.
Councilmember Chen thanked the public for their participation. He was glad to see the neighborhood City
office, although he would like to call it a remote police station. After the grand opening, he stopped by a
few times and found the doors closed. He was happy to see lights on this morning when he stopped by
and encouraged the public to use that venue to access City services. He thanked staff for their efforts
related to the neighborhood office and the city council for funding it.
Councilmember K. Johnson said it was good to see Susie Schaefer here tonight and to have her read the c
governor's proclamation about native plants. She was glad to hear the demonstration garden was open and a
that a lot of native plants have been transferred to City Park. She recalled when Councilmember Tibbott a
and she were on the transportation commission over a decade ago, one of their efforts was Highway 99. N
She was glad the legislature was able to put together a package of badly needed improvements. Ln
0
0
11. ADJOURN w
c
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:27 p.m. °'
E
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 25
Packet Pg. 89
7.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Megan Menkveld
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of payroll checks #65025 through #65027 for $6,090.18 dated April 5, 2022, payroll direct
deposit for $704,391.35, benefit checks #65028 through #65032 and wire payments for $647,018.48 for
the pay period March 16, 2022 through March 31, 2022.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
03-16-22 to 03-31-22 benefit checks summary report
03-16-2022 to 03-31-2022 payroll earnings report
Packet Pg. 90
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,044 - 03/16/2022 to 03/31/2022
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
65028
04/05/2022
bpas
BPAS
12,581.99
65029
04/05/2022
jhan
JOHN HANCOCK
106.96
65030
04/05/2022
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
3,434.56
65031
04/05/2022
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
5,529.84
65032
04/05/2022
afscme
WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO
2,347.80
24,001.15
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
3344
04/05/2022
pens
DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
313,693.81
3346
04/05/2022
aflac
AFLAC
4,148.04
3348
04/05/2022
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
28,948.91
3349
04/05/2022
us
US BANK
139,756.77
3350
04/05/2022
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N317761
129,039.51
3352
04/05/2022
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
6,611.29
3353
04/05/2022
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
819.00
623,017.33
Grand Totals: 647,018.48
7.4.a
vi
a�
v
r
m
Direct Deposit
m
0.00
0.00 cv
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0
a
4-
0
0.00
0
L
0.
Q
Q
Direct Deposit
V_
0
0.00
0.00
L
0.00
0
0.00
E
0.00
E
0.00
u3i
0.00
N
Y
V
N
0.00
v
.r
0.00
c
m
N
N
r
Cl?
CO)
O
O
r
N
N
t0
A
O
4/1/2022 Packet Pg. 91
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,044 (03/16/2022 to 03/31/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
181.00
0.00
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
80.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
586.00
24,144.91
122
VACATION
VACATION
760.00
31,319.22
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
70.00
2,720.69
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
38.00
1,093.44
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
190.75
6,991.05
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
36.00
1,587.75
130
COMP HOURS
Holiday Compensation Used
12.50
492.05
135
SICK
WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE
4.00
133.73
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
27.00
843.06
149
KELLY DAY
KELLY DAYS BUY BACK
48.00
2,127.88
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kellv Day Used
175.50
7,672.20
151
COMP HOURS
HOLIDAY COMP BUY BACK
48.00
1,868.40
152
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME BUY BACK
139.50
6,492.96
153
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY BUY BACK
40.00
2,024.91
154
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY BUY BACK
9.00
312.34
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
385.95
21,248.37
157
SICK
SICK LEAVE PAYOFF
240.50
13,178.34
158
VACATION
VACATION PAYOFF
112.28
4,323.83
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
1.00
52.63
161
VACATION
VACATION PREMIUM PAYOFF
53.75
2,147.10
170
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL BASE PAY
700.00
9,916.62
174
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY
0.00
300.00
175
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICAL
0.00
4,055.30
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
18,615.20
739,074.79
194
SICK
Emergency Sick Leave
122.00
3,724.76
195
REGULAR HOURS
ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
151.50
5,127.73
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
223.00
9,591.05
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
14.00
477.04
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
72.00
4,077.30
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
16.00
1,452.66
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
486.75
39,734.75
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
3.00
182.91
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
-104.21
04/01/2022 Packet Pg. 92
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,044 (03/16/2022 to 03/31/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
403
MISCELLANEOUS
PREMIUM PAY
0.00
69,997.50
405
ACTING PAY
OUT OF CLASS - POLICE
0.00
503.76
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
381.05
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,362.26
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
182.81
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
80.25
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
362.50
0.00
903
MISCELLANEOUS
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
0.00
225.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
140.39
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
148.12
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstructionist
0.00
92.72
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
185.44
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
308.91
cs
SICK
Converted Sick Hours
-399.00
0.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
171.68
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
127.02
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
895.02
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
717.15
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
772.80
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
6,611.64
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
461.43
furls
SICK
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
16.00
1,097.20
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
273.06
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
88.70
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
941.49
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
527.63
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevity 9%
0.00
4,697.39
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Longevity 7%
0.00
945.39
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Longevity 5%
0.00
706.98
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
259.00
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Longevity 1 %
0.00
401.43
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevity 3%
0.00
1,446.77
Iq6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevity .5%
0.00
294.14
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevity 1.5%
0.00
360.52
Iq8
LONGEVITY
Lonqevity 8%
0.00
252.04
04/01/2022 Packet Pg. 93
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,044 (03/16/2022 to 03/31/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
127.02
ooc
MISCELLANEOUS
OUT OF CLASS
0.00
431.45
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
103.70
pfml
ABSENT
Paid Family Medical Leave
60.00
0.00
pfmp
ABSENT
Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup
113.68
0.00
pfms
SICK
Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
56.32
2,069.78
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,689.06
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER
0.00
201.50
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
329.16
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
201.50
st
REGULAR HOURS
Serqeant Pay
0.00
151.13
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
127.02
vab
VACATION
VACATION ADD BACK
204.64
0.00
vap
VACATION
Vacation Premium
106.25
3,997.02
24,242.82 $1,054,390.34
Total Net Pay: $710,481.53
7.4.b
r
Q
04/01/2022 Packet Pg. 94
7.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #251938 through #252011 dated April 7, 2022 for $365,689.18 (re -issued check
#251968 $6,752.66), claim checks #252012 through #252115 dated April 14, 2022 for $683,274.77 and
wire payment of $14,319.45.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 04-07-22
claims 04-14-22
wire 04-14-22
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 04-14-22
Packet Pg. 95
7.5.a
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251938 4/7/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
0
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun r
c
INV-2-16482
INV-2-16482 - EDMONDS PD - MCIN
DET. POLOS 1 BLK 1 NAVY
>,
001.000.41.521.21.24.00
85.9£ a
NAME TAPES - 2
L_
001.000.41.521.21.24.00
16.0( 3
PATCH INSTALL - 2
c
001.000.41.521.21.24.00
6.0(
10.1 % Sales Tax
�
001.000.41.521.21.24.00
10.91 (D
INV-2-16910
INV-2-16910 - EDMONDS PD- SAUN
U
BALLISTIC PANELS
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0( R
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
,-
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0( o
TRAUMA PLATE
>
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
26.0( a
EXTERNAL CARRIER
a
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
225.0( Q
BIANCHI DBL MAG POUCH
N
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
39.5( ti
10.1 % Sales Tax
9
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
135.7'
INV-2-17040
INV-2-17040 - EDMONDS PD - SCIN
SAFARILAND ID PANEL
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
10.0(
HEAT PRESS A/C
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
10.0( E
2 NAMETAPES
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
18.0( tea,
VELCRO - NAME TAPES Q
001.000.41.521.70.24.00 12.0(
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.24.00 5.0E
INV-2-17041 INV-2-17041 - EDMONDS PD - SCIN
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 96
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
251938
4/7/2022
076040 911 SUPPLY INC
(Continued)
V2 TAC PANTS
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
64.9� >,
BELT KEEPERS
f°
a
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
17.2E L
BIANCHI INNER BELT
3
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
27.5( c
BIANCHI DUTY BELT
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
62.0( Y
5.11 STORM BOOTS - SCINKOVEC
W
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
150.0( U
DANNER BOOTS- GILGINAS
E
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
179.9E
10.1 % Sales Tax
,-
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
50.6 1 o
INV-2-17535
INV-2-17535 - EDMONDS PD - BAR[
fd
PATCH INSTALL/REMOVE - SRVC B
0 L
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
8.0( a
10.1 % Sales Tax
Q
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
0.8" N
Total :
N
2,214.X ti
0
251939
4/7/2022
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-94355
INTERPRETER SPANISH lA058764:
0
INTERPRETER SPANISH 1A058764;
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
150.0( •�
Total:
150.0( U
251940
4/7/2022
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
56020
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSI
r-
m
PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS
E
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
129.0( U
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
13.4, Q
Total:
142.4,
251941
4/7/2022
064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
144737933
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 122
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 97
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251941 4/7/2022 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
251942 4/7/2022 078776 AKRAMOFF LLC
251943 4/7/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
c
123.2�
10.4% Sales Tax
E
E
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
12.8, a
144737934
FIRE INSPECTION CITY HALL
(D
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12
3
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
92.5, -o
Total:
228.6: M
20014
PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION
U)
U
PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION
t
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
U
1022.01 E
Total:
1:022.01
z
013122048
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
o
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
R
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
8.0( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
0.81 Q
030722024
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
04
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
36.2E c
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
3.7, N
040422011
FINANCE DEPT WATER
E
Finance dept water
.2
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
56.5( U
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
5.9' E
040422012
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
t
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
f° r
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
29.7E Q
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
3.1 ,
081321005
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 98
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 4
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251943
4/7/2022
065568 ALLWATER INC
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
3.0�
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
>,
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
29.7E a
102021012
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
L
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
3
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
8.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
ea
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
0.8( Y
111621017
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
U
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
8.0( E
10.4% Sales Tax
M
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
0.& u
120121049
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
_0
>
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
37.0( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
3.8E Q
122721026
WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 12/29/2
N
Acct COEWaste:-
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.0( c
10.4% Sales Tax
c
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
0.9'
Total:
245.4'
251944
4/7/2022
001528 AM TEST INC
126483
WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A002931
SAMPLE #22-A002931
W
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
125.0( E
Total:
125.0( u
m
r
251945
4/7/2022
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
656000210276
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
Q
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
27.9"
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
2.9(
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 99
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251945 4/7/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 5
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
656000212145 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
c
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT`
E,
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6- a
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
L
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
c
6.1
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
Y
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1- y
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
U
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1- E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
ii
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0£ ,-
10.4% Sales Tax
O
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1; >
10.4% Sales Tax
o
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6z a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6z N
10.4% Sales Tax
ti
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6, c
10.4% Sales Tax
o
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6,
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.6-
656000212149 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2� t
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
r
19.1( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.9 1
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.9�
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 100
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 6
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251945
4/7/2022
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
656000213916
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
E
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
27.9- a
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
2.9( .3
Total:
128.4'
c
�a
251946
4/7/2022
070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
123478
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
Y
UB Outsourcing area Printing 670
U
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
49.0E
UB Outsourcing area Printing 670
E
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
49.0E 'M
UB Outsourcing area Printing 670
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
50.5E O
UB Outsourcing area Postage 670
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
149.9( o
UB Outsourcing area Postage 670
a
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
149.9( Q
10.25% Sales Tax
N
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
5.0' N
10.25% Sales Tax
o
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
5.0' c
10.25% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
5.1E •�
Total:
463.75
251947
4/7/2022
001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC
16886
DISCOVERY STAFF NAME BADGES
r-
DISCOVERY STAFF NAME BADGES
E
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
37.5( U
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
3.9z Q
Total:
41.41
251948
4/7/2022
001527 AWWA
7002004538
PW: ANNUAL AWWA MEMBERSHIP
PW: ANNUAL AWWA MEMBERSHIP
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 101
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 7
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251948
4/7/2022
001527 AWWA
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
2,303.0(
Total:
2,303.0(
251949
4/7/2022
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
28227271
WWTP: 3/1-3/31/22 CONTRACT CH(
3/1-3/31/22 CONTRACT CHG - COPI
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
81.8z
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
8.5-
28227279
COUNCIL COPIER RENTAL
Copier rental 3/01/22 - 3/31/22
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
29.0E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
3.0,
Total:
122.4°
251950
4/7/2022
071816 CARLSON, JESSICA
10191 DRAWING
10191 ADVENTURES IN ANIME INS'
10191 ADVENTURES IN ANIME INS'
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
198.0(
Tota I :
198.0(
251951
4/7/2022
063902 CITY OF EVERETT
122001810
122001810 - EDMONDS PD - SNIFFE
BALLISTIC VEST - SNIFFEN
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
488.6z
122001894
WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS
WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
534.6(
Total:
1,023.2'
251952
4/7/2022
076247 COLLEY, CASEY
3/29/22 REIMBURSE
CLAIM FOR EXPENSES
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
39.0(
Total :
39.0(
251953
4/7/2022
070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
8498310301175175
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
143.9<
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 102
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
251953
4/7/2022
070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
(Continued)
8498310301175191
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
001.000.64.571.29.42.00
8498310301340308
UPTOWN CITY HALL - DIGITAL CAB
Uptown City Hall - 23632 Highway 99
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Total
251954
4/7/2022
065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
MARCH 2O22
MARCH 2O22 - DRY CLEANING - EE
MARCH 2O22 DRY CLEANING
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Tota I :
251955
4/7/2022
072786 CTS LANGUAGE LINK
210786
LANGUAGE LINK MARCH '22
LANGUAGE LINK MARCH '22
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
Total
251956
4/7/2022
076172 DK SYSTEMS
30339
NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - M,
NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - M,
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
251957
4/7/2022
007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
00010124199
WWTP: PO 707 BAILER SPONGE
PO 707 BAILER SPONGE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
251958
4/7/2022
076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
2903
WWTP: PO 735 SPRAY PAINT
PO 735 SPRAY PAINT
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
7.5.a
Page: 8
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 103
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251958 4/7/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 9
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
10.4% Sales Tax
c
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
0.7,
2922
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
f°
a
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
L
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
28.5E .3
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
c
2.9
2929
WWTP: PO735 CAPS, ELBOW, TEE
(n
PO735 CAPS, ELBOW, TEES, FLAI
U
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
74.4
10.4% Sales Tax
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
7.7z n
2934
PM: FENCING, AUTOMOTIVE RAMF
U
PM: FENCING, AUTOMOTIVE RAMF
O
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
81.2E >
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.4E a
2936
WWTP: PO 735 LITTR CATSPRIDG
Q
PO 735 LITTR CATSPRIDGE
N
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
26.9 1 ti
10.4% Sales Tax
c
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2.8( o
2938
PM: HOSE
N
PM: HOSE
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
41.9� Z
10.4% Sales Tax
+%
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.3 �
2942
PM: BRASS HOSE, SHUTOFF VALVI
E
PM: BRASS HOSE, SHUTOFF VALVI
m
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
43.9E Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
4.5 ,
2943
PM: SPRAY PAINT
PM: SPRAY PAINT
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 104
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251958 4/7/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
251959
251960
4/7/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
2944
2949
3-38565
6-01127
6-01130
6-01140
4/7/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR213200
7.5.a
Page: 10
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
24.9(
10.4% Sales Tax
E
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.6( a
PM: FLOOR SQUEGEE
L
PM: FLOOR SQUEGEE
3
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
28.9E -o
10.4% Sales Tax
M
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
3.0' Y
PM: WASHERS, MENDING PLATE
U
PM: WASHERS, MENDING PLATE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
13.0E E
10.4% Sales Tax
R
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1.3E ,u
Total :
409.&
SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410
R
o
L
SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410
a
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
56.3E Q
WWTP: 1/15-3/16/22 METER 2088:
N
1/15-3/16/22 METER 2088: 200 2ND
N
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
212.2< o
WWTP: 1/15-3/16/22 METER 9439:
c
1/15-3/16/22 METER 9439: 200 2ND
N
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
23.7E .
WWTP: 1/15-3/16/22 METER 50104E
1/15-3/16/22 METER 5010484: 200 2
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
1,629.7,
Total:
1,922.1( E
U
MK5533 - PUBLIC WORKS
f°
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
Q
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
4.0
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
2.3(
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 105
vchlist
04/07/2022 10:26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
251960 4/7/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued)
AR215791
7.5.a
Page: 11
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
2.3(
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
E
E,
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1.6< a
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
L
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1.6< .3
PUUBLIC WORKS COPIER USEAGE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
1.6,
10.4% Sales Tax
Y
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
0.2z
10.4% Sales Tax
U
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
0.2z E
10.4% Sales Tax
ii
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
0.1 ' ,�
10.4% Sales Tax
O
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
0.1; >
10.4% Sales Tax
o
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0.1; a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
0.4, c,4
MK5533 PUBLIC WORKS
ti
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
c
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
3.2 � o
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
1.8E
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
1.8E
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
aD
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1.3" t
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
r
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1.3" Q
PUBLIC WORKS USEAGE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
1.3(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
0.3z
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 106
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
251960 4/7/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued)
251961
251962
251963
251964
4/7/2022 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 173064
4/7/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
4/7/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS
4/7/2022 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
EDH950394
' ' pill -TIN
EDH951123
PO # Description/Account
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total ;
E21 FC.SERVICES THRU 2/28/22
E21 FC.SERVICES THRU 2/28/22
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
Total
E22JB. RFQ AD FOR SERVICES
E22JB. RFQ AD FOR SERVICES
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
EDH950803 - ACCT 14126500 - EDN
UNCLAIMED PROPERTYAD 3/19
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
PLANNING - LEGAL ADD
Advertisement of City Application-
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
Total
NFalk March 2022 EXPENSE REIMB: MILEAGE
Claim for Expenses (March 2022)-
001.000.62.524.10.43.00
Total
WAEVE188012 WATER - SIPPLIES/ RAG SHIRTS &
WATER - SIPPLIES/ RAG SHIRTS &
7.5.a
Page: 12
Amoun
c
0.1 � E,
�a
a
0.1f L
�3
0.11 c
0.1, Y
U
m
0.11 U
27.0( E
.ii
U
4-
0
630.0( >
630.0( o
a
a
Q
N
199.5, N
ti
0
0
22.3E N
E
2
U
70.5,
292.4( y
E
t
U
m
42.3`, Q
42.3°
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 107
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 13
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251964
4/7/2022
066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
162.5,
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
16.9( a
WAEVE188060
WATER - SUPPLIES/ WIPER
L
WATER - SUPPLIES/ WIPER
3
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
194.1 £
10.4% Sales Tax
sa
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
20.1 � Y
Total:
393.81
t
251965
4/7/2022
065427 FCS GROUP
3554-22203082
E22NB.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
E
E22NB.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
421.000.74.534.80.41.10
395.0(
E22NB.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
0
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
395.0( R
E22NB.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
0
423.000.75.535.80.41.20
395.0( a
3555-22203083
E22NA.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
Q
E22NA.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
N
421.000.74.534.80.41.10
251.E 1 N
E22NA.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
0
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
251.6, c
E22NA.SERVICES THRU 3/18/22
423.000.75.535.80.41.20
251.6E .
Total:
1,940.0(
251966
4/7/2022
009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
1063825-1
WATER - INVENTORY
WATER - INVENTORY -
E
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
4,828.9E U
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
502.2- Q
1078509
WATER - INVENTORY -
WATER - INVENTORY-
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
5,844.4<
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 108
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251966 4/7/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
251967
251968
251969
251970
4/7/2022 075846 FRONTIER PRECISION INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
Tota I :
248562
INV 248562 - EDMONDS PD
DRONE WARRANTY
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
248728
INV 248728 - EDMONDS PD
H20T CAMERA WARRANTY
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
4/7/2022 078787 FW WAAURORA MARKETPLACE LLC Apr-2022
4/7/2022 078893 GETTRICH ENTERPRISES
4/7/2022 012199 GRAINGER
Mar-2022
�PiE�3
9248370653
9254054829
Total :
HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD CITY HA
Monthly Rent
001.000.60.557.20.45.00
HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD CITY HA
Monthly Rent prorated per property
001.000.60.557.20.45.00
Total
COUNCIL RETREAT SPEAKER
Council Retreat 2/25/2022 Custom
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
Total
PUBLIC SAFETY -
PARTS/ DOOR L(
PUBLIC SAFETY -
PARTS/ DOOR L(
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
PUBLIC WORKS -
PARTS/ V-BELT
PUBLIC WORKS -
PARTS/ V-BELT
7.5.a
Page: 14
Amoun
c
607.8,
113783.4' E
�a
a
aD
L
�3
1,199.0(
c
�a
124.7( Y
U
m
t
U
1,209.0( E
.ii
125.7z u
2,658.4z o
M
0
L
a
4,453.8E Q
N
N
2,298.7E c
6,752.6E
0
E
M
300.0( U
300.0( E-
m
E
t
U
m
r
121.6E Q
12.6E
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 109
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251970 4/7/2022 012199 GRAINGER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
251971 4/7/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3031374
251972 4/7/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC
251973 4/7/2022 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
U2216000414
U2216012560
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
F.A.C. - PARTS
F.A.C. - PARTS
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total ;
WWTP: PO 736 HOMER BUCKETS,
PO 736 HOMER BUCKETS, ROPES
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
WATER - INVENTORY -
WATER - INVENTORY-
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
WATER - SUPPLIES
WATER - SUPPLIES
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total ;
3553666 STAPLER, STAPLES, PENCIL, LEAC
Office supplies - stapler, staples,
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
7.5.a
Page: 15
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 110
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
251973 4/7/2022 073548 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued)
251974 4/7/2022 076828 INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC W220312
251975 4/7/2022 078471 LEMM, KEVIN
251976 4/7/2022 078809 MCKAY POLYGRAPH
10223 TAEKWON-DO
3222022EPD
3282022EPD
251977 4/7/2022 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0261306
251978 4/7/2022 020495 MIDWAY PLYWOOD INC
251979 4/7/2022 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS
Description/Account
Total
W220312 - EDMONDS PD
CALIBRATE PROPERTY RM SCALE
001.000.41.521.80.48.00
Total
10223 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI`
10223 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI`
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
3222022EPD - EDMONDS PD
PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 3)
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
3282022EPD - EDMONDS PD
PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 3)
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Total
E194FM & E195FM - PARTS/ AMBEF
E194FM & E195FM - PARTS/ AMBEF
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Total
C72040 E191 PO - WOOD
E191 PO - WOOD
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Total
8824-2 BRACKETTS LANDING - NORTH BA
BRACKETTS LANDING - NORTH BA
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
7.5.a
Page: 16
Amoun
92.71
m
E
�a
a
260.0( m
260.0( 3
c
�a
N
668.4(
668.4( t
U
E
2
U
350.0( o
R
175.0( a
525.0( Q
N
N
ti
2,257.4( 9
0
234.7E
2,492.1 S
m
230.0( E
U
m
23.9'
253.99 Q
10,173.0(
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 111
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251979 4/7/2022 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS
251980
251981
251982
251983
4/7/2022 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC
4/7/2022 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
20-2775.01-11 E21 GA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/22
E21GA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/22
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
Total
0649190-IN WATER/ SEWER - GAITERS
WATER/ SEWER - GAITERS
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
WATER/ SEWER - GAITERS
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
4/7/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671
4/7/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
3685-195025
Total :
HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION
HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/
HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total
UNIT 123 - PARTS/ BRAKE ROTOR
UNIT 123 - PARTS/ BRAKE ROTOR
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
7.5.a
Page: 17
Amoun
c
1,057.9� >%
11,230.95 a
m
L
3
9,651.0(
9,651.0( Y
U
m
t
U
22.3E •9
z
22.3; p
R
8.8( o
L
a
8.8( Q
N
3.2E c�
ti
0
3.21 o
68.8'
E
26.2,
E
t
U
141.4,
167.71 Q
129.9�
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 112
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251983 4/7/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
251984
251985
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-195618 UNIT 11 -SUPPLIES/ SILICONE
UNIT 11 -SUPPLIES/ SILICONE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
4/7/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT HPC031022
4/7/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
PB032322
200000704821
200007876143
200009595790
200011439656
200016558856
200016815843
PLANNING - PROF SVCS
Meeting minutes for Historic
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
PLANNING- PROF SVCS
Preparation of Planning Board meetir
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
Total
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
7.5.a
Page: 18
Amoun
c
13.5, >,
�a
a
14.9E .3
c
160.0E Y
U
m
t
U
E
76.0E
0
132.0( R
208.0( o
a
a
Q
2,089.3E N
ti
0
4
513.2z N
E
2
1,032.51
d
E
385.7E u
m
Q
1,184.9,
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 113
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 19
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251985 4/7/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
(Continued)
200017676343
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
E
E
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
848.7' a
200019375639
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801
L
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801
3
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
327.9E
200019895354
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / P
Y
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
438.8E uw
200020415911
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
E
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
65.7E 'm
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
249.9E O
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
>
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
249.9E o
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH :
a
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
249.9E Q
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH :
N
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
249.9E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH :
c
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
249.9 1 o
200024711901
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
N
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
E
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
525.2< Z
Total:
9,463.15
m
251986 4/7/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
40120
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-CR
E
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-CR
U
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
m
225.0( P
40121
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-ELF
Q
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-ELF
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
225.0(
40122
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-EBI
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-EBI
Page:
19
Packet Pg. 114
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 20
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
251986
4/7/2022
030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
(Continued)
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
225.0(
40123
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SCI
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SCI
f°
a
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
225.0( L
40124
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SCI
3
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SCI
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
225.0(
40125
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SO
Y
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SO
y
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
225.0( u
Total:
1,350.0( E
251987
4/7/2022
068657 ROBERT HALF
59722367
TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING
.ii
U
Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee
o
001.000.31.514.31.41.00
2,440.0( i
Total:
2,440.0( o
a
251988
4/7/2022
064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC
5-035689
UNIT 904 - BATTERY
°-
Q
UNIT 904 - BATTERY
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
123.1E N
10.4% Sales Tax
ti
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0
12.8"
5-035762
UNIT 960 - BATTERY
N
UNIT 960 - BATTERY
E
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
123.1.E .2
10.5% Sales Tax
U
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
12.9(
Total:
272.01 E
t
251989
4/7/2022
066806 SANDERS, BILL
APRIL2022
DOT PHYSICAL REIMBURSEMENT
r
DOT PHYSICAL REIMBURSEMENT
Q
111.000.68.542.90.49.00
99.0(
Total :
99.0(
251990
4/7/2022
076328 SCJ ALLIANCE
67009
E20CE.SERVICES THRU 2/26/22
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 115
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 21
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
251990 4/7/2022 076328 SCJ ALLIANCE
(Continued)
E20CE.SERVICES THRU 2/26/22
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
36,822.7,' �%
E20CE.SERVICES THRU 2/26/22
f°
a
112.000.68.595.20.61.00
5,484.2, L
Total:
42,306.91, .3
251992 4/7/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
200124873
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
ea
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
Y
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
38.3E u
200202919
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
E
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
75.6, 'M
200274959
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
o
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.3,
200386456
CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE
o
CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE
a
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
117.3( Q
200468593
LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD /
N
LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD /
N
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
279.7� o
200493153
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
c
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
N
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
39.6, .
200714038
SEAVIEW PARK
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
27.1( y
200748606
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
t
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
U
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.3,
200943348
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
Q
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
53.3E
201054327
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 116
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251992 4/7/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 22
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
c
89.8
201192226
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
f°
a
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.7E L
201197084
SEAVIEW PARK
3
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
123.0'
201236825
FISHING PIER RESTROOMS
Y
FISHING PIER RESTROOMS
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
639.4, r-
201265980
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL �
E
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL �
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
_M
200.5�
201374964
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P
O
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
22.3, o
201532926
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
a
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
Q
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
175.4' N
201557303
CEMETERY BUILDING
N
CEMETERY BUILDING
o
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
143.3" c
201563434
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
32.6E 2
201582152
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W
(D
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
33.1 E
201594488
LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S
U
LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 25.3E Q
201610276 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i
OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT �
130.000.64.536.50.47.00 8.8,
201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN!
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 117
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251992 4/7/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 23
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN!
c
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
340.0'
>,
201703758
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
f°
a
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
L
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
32.2,
'3
201762101
415 5TH AVE S
415 5TH AVE S
ca
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
27.6,
Y
201782646
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
U
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
19.3 ,
E
202077194
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
is
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
U
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
538.4E
202139655
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
_0
>
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
0
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
29.8,
a
202161535
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
Q
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
N
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
80.8'
202289096
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
o
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
0
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
57.3E
N
202356739
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
E
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
2
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
29.9(
+:
202421582
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
(D
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
E
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
162.4,
m
202499539
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
Q
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 626.2�
202579520 WWTP: 3/1-3/31/22 ENERGY MGMT
3/1-3/31/22 ENERGY MGMT SERVIC
423.000.76.535.80.47.61 9.7,
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 118
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
251992 4/7/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
251993
251994
251995
4/7/2022 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
4/7/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
204292213
204467435
220547582
220792758
2022-7252
4503
4/7/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 24849
7.5.a
Page: 24
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
E
E
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
84.7( a
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
L
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
3
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
25.3z -o
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
Y
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
41.8 1 y
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
E
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
85.5( 'R
Total :
4,375.2E
0
INV 2022-7252 - MED FEB 2022 - EE
INMATE MED SERVICES - FEB 20222
o
L
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
162.3E 0-
INMATE PHARM SERVICES - FEB 21
Q
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
8.9, N
Total :
171.2E N
ti
APR-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA
0
9
APR-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA
N
001.000.39.528.00.41.50
76,390.8E E
APR-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA
R
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
2,010.2E U
APR-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
2,010.2� E
Total :
80,411.4,
m
r
WWTP: 3/2022 JANITORIAL SERVIi Q
3/2022 JANITORIAL SERVICES
423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1,165.E
Total : 1,165.E ,
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 119
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 25
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251996
4/7/2022
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103583
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
r
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
c
E,
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
717.7z
103585
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
f°
a
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
L
.3
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
704.5£
103586
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
605.1 £ Y
103587
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC
U
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,282.5' E
103588
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
R
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
U
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
459.8� O
Total:
3,769.9( >
0
251997
4/7/2022
038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
126663/4
FAC MAINT - WORK WEAR S. MILLI
L
a
FAC MAINT - WORK WEAR S. MILLI
Q
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
79.0' N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
8.2, o
Total:
87.2' c
251998
4/7/2022
040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
S103699546.001
CITY HALL - PARTS
E
CITY HALL - PARTS
2
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
608.6' U
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
63.9' E
Total:
672.5' U
m
r
251999
4/7/2022
078863 THE LANGUAGE EXCHANGE INC
426395
INV 426395 - EDMONDS PD
Q
3/2 INTERPRETATION - TRYKAR
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
297.0(
TRAVEL TIME
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
132.0(
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 120
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 26
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
251999
4/7/2022
078863 078863 THE LANGUAGE EXCHANGE INC (Continued)
Total :
429.0(
m
252000
4/7/2022
027269 THE PART WORKS INC
INV78867
PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ SIDE MO
E
PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ SIDE MO
sa
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
a
364.3, m
Freight
3
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
11.5,
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
39.4E Y
Total:
415.3( u
t
252001
4/7/2022
038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION
US53022
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI
U
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI
E
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
2
461.9� U
10.5% Sales Tax
o
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
48.5' -jj
US53323
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP
0
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP
a
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
1,661.9, Q
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
174.5( N
Total:
2,346.9, c
Iq
252002
4/7/2022
070774 ULINE INC
146822319
WWTP: PO 802 SORBENT PADS, Ri
PO 802 SORBENT PADS, ROLLS, DI
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
832.8( .m
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
82.9<
10.4% Sales Tax
°'
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
95.21 u
Total:
1,010.9,
Q
252003
4/7/2022
071549 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC
50062614
WWTP: 3/11/22 SOD. BISULFITE
3/11/22 SOD. BISULFITE
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
1,836.4'
10.4% Sales Tax
Page:
26
Packet Pg. 121
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252003
4/7/2022 071549 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
190.9E m
Total:
2,027.4( E,
�a
a
252004
4/7/2022 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
2030146
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
aD
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
23
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
120.0E
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
120.0E Y
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
U
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
123.6E
Total:
363.7f E
252005
4/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
9902457004
C/A 571242650-0001
R
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg
o
001.000.62.524.20.42.00
640.9z -jj
iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk
o
001.000.31.514.31.42.00
36.3z a
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc
Q'
Q
001.000.61.557.20.42.00
98.8(
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council
N
001.000.11.511.60.42.00
850.4E c
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court
Iq
001.000.23.512.51.42.00
0
193.5E N
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs
E
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
271.5E 2
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering
001.000.67.518.21.42.00
1,340.9,
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities
E
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
267.4 1 U
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance
001.000.31.514.20.42.00
56.5' Q
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance
001.000.31.514.23.42.00
56.5,
iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR
001.000.22.518.10.42.00
141.1-
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 122
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252005 4/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 28
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Human Sen
c
001.000.63.557.20.42.00
50.3 >,
iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS
f°
a
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
255.6" L
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor
3
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
100.7z c
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin
001.000.64.571.21.42.00
50.3, Y
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Maint
(D
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
436.9( U
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec
E
001.000.64.571.22.42.00
140.7E R
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD
-
001.000.41.521.10.35.00
110.3E o
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD
>
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
2,846.2z Q
Air cards PD
a
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
1,200.3, Q
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning
N
001.000.62.558.60.42.00
318.6E ti
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
c
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
0.3E c
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
N
E
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
0.1('�
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
0.3E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
°'
t
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
0.1(
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
r
0.1( Q
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
166.T
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
50.3 ,
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 123
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252005 4/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 29
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe
c
E,
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
95.5E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe
f°
a
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
95.5E L
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer
3
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
272.2< c
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water
sa
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
537.1 £ Y
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
156.3 1 U
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn
E
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
265.2E 2
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn
-
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
265.2z
iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP
>
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
661.1 E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco
a
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
40.0" Q
9902457004 C/A 571242650-0001
N
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
ti
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
-18 7, c
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
o
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
-5.3E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
-18.7,
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
-5.3E E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
t
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
-5.3E r
9902598785 C/A 772540262-00001 Q
Cradlepoint 1 - IT
512.000.31.518.88.42.00 100.0-
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
421.000.74.534.80.49.20 3.3-
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 124
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252005 4/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
252006
252007
252008
252009
4/7/2022 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
122005793
4/7/2022 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0058950-2588-9
4/7/2022 075283 WAVE
4/7/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
3201-1027483-01
8153
7.5.a
Page: 30
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
0
E
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
3.3-
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
a
423.000.75.535.80.49.20
3.4( L
Trimble 1 - Storm
3
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
10.01
Lake Ballinger monitor
ea
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
31.5, Y
Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te
(D
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
17.0z U
Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te
E
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
17.0( R
Total :
12,203.31 ,-
0
122005793 - MARCH 22 - EDMONDS
CPL BACKGROUNDS MARCH 2O22
0
001.000.237.100
13.2E a
Total :
13.2E Q
WWTP: 3/2022 WASTE PICKUPS
N
3/2022 WASTE PICKUPS
ti
0
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
138,241.21 c
Total:
138,241.2'
E
FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF
High Speed Internet service 04/01/22
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
816.0(
Total:
816.0( E
t
NEW BUSINESS CARD MASTERS
r
20.000 New Business Card Masters
Q
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
550.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
57.3(
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 125
vchlist
04/07/2022 10 :26:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.a
Page: 31
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252009
4/7/2022 073552 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
(Continued)
Total :
608.2F
m
252010
4/7/2022 071467 WEST COAST PET MEMORIAL
WA70014-1-0055
WA70014-1-0055 - EDMONDS PD
E
COMMUNAL CREMATION 4LBS
sa
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
a
16.0( m
Total:
16.0( 3
252011
4/7/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
253-003-6887
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[
c
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI
ea
N
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
42.1E
253-012-9189
WWTP: 3/25-4/24/22 AUTO DIALER
t
3/25-4/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOIC
U
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
41.5E •9
425 771 5553
WWTP: 3/25-4/24/22 AUTO DIALER:
U
3/25-4/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSI
o
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
127.1 £ -ii
Total :
210.91 0
L
73
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
Q
372,441.8'
Q
73
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
372,441.8' N
N
ti
O
O
N
E
M
V
C
d
E
t
V
f0
r
Q
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 126
7.5.b
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252012 4/14/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun r
c
CM-2-1735
CM-2-1735 - RETURN ATTACHMENT
ATTATCHMENTS NOT NEEDED - 2
>,
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
-27.1 £ a
G ATTATCHMENTS NOT NEEDED - 3
L_
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
-127.41 3
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
-15.6<
INV-2-17395
INV-2-17395 - EDMONDS PD - REC(
RECORDS UNIT FLEECES - 2
W
001.000.41.521.11.24.00
99.9E U
Freight
E
001.000.41.521.11.24.00
22.0( R
10.4% Sales Tax
,-
001.000.41.521.11.24.00
12.6� o
INV-2-17424
INV-2-17424 - EDMONDS PD - HATC
>
BALLISTIC VEST
L
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0( a
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
Q
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0( N
TRAUMA PLATE
�
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
26.0(
10.1 % Sales Tax
c
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
108.9� E
INV-2-17425
INV-2-17425 - EDMONDS PD - SAN(
BALLISTIC VEST
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
960.0(
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
m
t
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
93.0(
TRAUMA PLATE
m
r
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 26.0( Q
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 108.9�
INV-2-17536 INV-2-17536 - EDMONDS PD - HATC
SOFTSHELL FLEECE
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 127
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252012
4/14/2022
076040 911 SUPPLY INC
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
119.9�
NAME TAPE
E
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
8.0( Q
10.1 % Sales Tax
L
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
INV-2-17538
INV-2-17538 - EDMONDS PD - SAN(
SOFT SHELL FLEECE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
119.9� Y
10.1 % Sales Tax
U
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
12.1 ,
Total:
2,613.4( E
.ii
252013
4/14/2022
078776 AKRAMOFF LLC
20012
SNOW RESP PLAN.SVCS TO 3/31/2
U
SNOW RESP PLAN.SVCS THRU 3/3
0
111.000.68.542.71.41.00
2,500.0( R
20013
SNOW RESP PLAN.SVCS TO 2/28/2
0
SNOW RESP PLAN.SVCS THRU 2/2
a
111.000.68.542.71.41.00
2,576.0( Q
Total :
5,076.0( N
N
252014
4/14/2022
000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
10960
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
4
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
136,438.5( N
Total:
136,438.5( E
.R
252015
4/14/2022
065568 ALLWATER INC
040422013
WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 4/4/22 1
U
Acct COEWaste:-
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
37.2E E
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
3.9"
Total :
41.1( Q
252016
4/14/2022
001528 AM TEST INC
126392
WWTP: SAMPLES #22-A002927-291�
SAMPLES #22-A002927-2930
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
200.0(
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 128
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
252016 4/14/2022 001528 001528 AM TEST INC (Continued)
252017 4/14/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 656000213914
656000213915
656000217758
252018 4/14/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 123539
7.5.b
Page: 3
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
Total:
200.0(
m
WWTP: 3/30/22 UNIFORMSJOWEL
E
Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.48 tax @ 1
a
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
52.6E m
Rentals & Prep Charges $29.91 + $ 3
3
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
29.9-
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
5.4E Y
10.4% Sales Tax
U
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
3.1-
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
E
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
M
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
63.4,
10.4% Sales Tax
o
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
6.5� >
WWTP: 4/6/22 UNIFORMSJOWELS
o
Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1
a
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
52.6E Q
Rentals & Prep Charges $29.91 + $ 3
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
N
29.9- N
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
5.5< c
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
3.1 , .
Total:
252.4°
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
r-
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2922
E
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
214.0E U
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2922
f°
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
214.0E Q
UB Outsourcing area Printing 2922
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
220.5E
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2922
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
620.8,
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 129
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 4
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252018
4/14/2022
070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
(Continued)
UB Outsourcing area Postage 2922
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
620.8(
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
21.9�
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
21.9�
10.25% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
22.6
Total :
1,956.9(
252019
4/14/2022
001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO
80154
ROUGH BOX - HOPPLER
ROUGH BOX - HOPPLER
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
738.0(
Tota I :
738.0(
252020
4/14/2022
075629 AV CAPTURE ALL INC
2573 tx
RECORDING SOFTWARE - DIFFER
RECORDING SOFTWARE - differenc
001.000.23.512.51.49.00
1.5(
Total :
1.5(
252021
4/14/2022
073834 BATTERIES PLUS
P50382298
WWTP: PO 737 AAA & 12V BATTER
PO 737 AAA & 12V BATTERIES deliv
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
1,377.2(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
143.2:
Total :
1,520.4;
252022
4/14/2022
073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
23045
EODC. SERVICES THRU 2/26/222
EODC. SERVICES THRU 2/26/222
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
9,202.6(
EODC. SERVICES THRU 2/26/222
125.000.68.595.33.41.00
1,661.0 ,
Total :
10,863.7°
252023
4/14/2022
078467 BMC EAST LLC
70918223-00
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ POSTS
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 130
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252023
4/14/2022
078467 BMC EAST LLC
(Continued)
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ POSTS
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
2,410.8f >%
10.4% Sales Tax
a
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
250.7; L
Total:
2,661.51 .3
252024
4/14/2022
002800 BRAKE & CLUTCH SUPPLY
672913
UNIT 11 - PARTS/ SEAL, BRAKE DR
ea
UNIT 11 - PARTS/ SEAL, BRAKE DR
Y
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
624.6E u
10.4% Sales Tax
M
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
64.9E E
673252
UNIT 11 PARTS RETURNED (ORIG
M
UNIT 11 PARTS RETURNED (ORIG
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-102.3E O
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-10.6E o
Total:
576.61 a
Q
252025
4/14/2022
003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
346126
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
N
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
759.6E
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
4
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
0
759.6E N
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
E
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
759.6E 2
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
759.6,
10.4% Sales Tax
E
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
79.0' U
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
79.0' Q
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
79.0
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
78.9�
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 131
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 6
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252025 4/14/2022 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
(Continued)
346320
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
E,
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
738.5E a
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
L
.3
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
738.5E
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
c
738.5E
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
738.5E (D
10.4% Sales Tax
U
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
76.8- E
10.4% Sales Tax
ii
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
76.8- ,-
10.4% Sales Tax
O
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
76.8" >
10.4% Sales Tax
o
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
76.8, a
Total :
6,616.15 Q
N
252026 4/14/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
5823357
ROADWAY - 1/2" HMA & ASPHALT E
N
ROADWAY - 1/2" HMA & ASPHALT E
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
371.4- c
5823671
ROADWAY - 1/2" HMA & ASPHALT E
ROADWAY - 1/2" HMA & ASPHALT E
E
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
461.1, U
5823993
ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E
ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E
(D
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
278.7, t
5824562
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
m
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
438.2- Q
5824843
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
236.4E
5825386
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
Page:
6
Packet Pg. 132
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 7
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252026
4/14/2022
076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
(Continued)
ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP
m
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
482.8, >,
Total:
2,268.8( a
m
252027
4/14/2022
018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY
95400637
STORM - GRAVEL DRAIN ROCK
3
STORM - GRAVEL DRAIN ROCK
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
959.5-
10.1 % Sales Tax
Y
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
96.9', u
Total :
1,056.4;
252028
4/14/2022
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
27409016
C165 CONTRACT CHARGES
E
Contract charge C165 s/n 3EP01502
U
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
1,211.3, o
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
125.9E o
27787786
DEV SVCS LEASE - COPIER
a
Invoice dated 12/12/21, rec'd 4/12/22
Q
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
21 /A
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
22.6,
27787789
CANON 5750
4
contract charges 12/01 - 12/31/2021
N
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
181.6< E
contract charges 12/01 - 12/31/2021
fd
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
U
22.7(
contract charges 12/01 - 12/31/2021
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
m
22.7- E
10.4% Sales Tax
U
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
18.8E
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
2.3E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
2.3E
28078258
FLEET COPIER
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 133
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 8
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252028
4/14/2022
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Continued)
Fleet Copier
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
35.0 1 >,
10.4% Sales Tax
a
511.000.77.548.68.45.00
3.6E L
28380472
ENG COPIER APRIL 2022
.3
ENG COPIER APRIL 2022
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
253.4E
10.5% Sales Tax
Y
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
26.6E (D
28380473
DEV SVCS MONTHLY COPIER CON
Dev Svcs Copier (SN 3AP01472)-
E
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
217.4, n
10.5% Sales Tax
,U
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
22.81' 0
Total:
2,387.1(
0
L
252029
4/14/2022
069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
T546922
MS VISIO LICENSING
a
MS Visio Licensing - Qty 5
Q
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
503.5E N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
52.3 ,
Total:
555.9, c
252030
4/14/2022
003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
CG110255
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
E
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
fd
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
U
254.8z
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
26.7.E E
RN03220996
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
U
YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL
f°
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
63.0( Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
6.5E
Tota I :
351.1
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 134
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 9
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252031
4/14/2022
069457 CITY OF EDMONDS
INV-62
E21 FA. STMWTR PMT&FEE
r
E21 FA. STMWTR PMT&FEE
c
E,
332.000.64.594.76.65.00
247.9(
E21 FA. STMWTR PMT&FEE
f°
a
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
122.1( L
Total:
370.0( .3
252032
4/14/2022
019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
17662
WWTP: 2021 O&M BALANCE+CON;
2021 O&M Balance
Y
423.000.75.535.80.47.20
202,906.2( u
Edmonds Share of 2021 CONSTRUC
423.000.75.535.80.47.20
3,318.2' E
17667
WWTP: 1/2022 M/O+SEWER
ii
1/2022 M/O & SEWER
U
423.000.75.535.80.47.20
42,307.0( O
Total:
248,531.4,
0
252033
4/14/2022
073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC
APR-2022
C/A CITYOFED00001
a
Apr-2022 Fiber Optics Internet
Q
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
661.5�
Total:
661.55 N
252034
4/14/2022
006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
3376786
E22CF/E22CE. RFQ AD
4
E22CF RFQ AD
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
317.4( E
E22CE RFQ AD
M
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
317.4( U
Total:
634.8( C
m
252035
4/14/2022
078749 DATAFY LLC
2332
DATAFY SERVICES 2ND QUARTER
t
DATAFY SERVICES 2ND QUARTER
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
r
3,114.0( Q
Total :
3,114.0(
252036
4/14/2022
006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY
22-WA00240588-1
WWTP: 2ND HALF 2021 WASTEWA
2ND HALF 2021 WASTEWATER PE
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 135
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
252036 4/14/2022 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY (Continued)
252037 4/14/2022 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2022030029
252038 4/14/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS
252039 4/14/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
29719
30230
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.41.50
Total :
CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098
Scan Services for March 2022
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
Total
CITY HALL - LABOR & MATERIALS I
CITY HALL - LABOR & MATERIALS 1
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
FIRE STATION 20 - LABOR & MATEF
FIRE STATION 20 - LABOR & MATEF
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
PREVAILING WAGE
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Total
2945 E191 PO - PARTS/ HINGE
E191 PO - PARTS/ HINGE
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
2960 WATER - SUPPLIES/ GROUNDING I
WATER - SUPPLIES/ GROUNDING I
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
7.5.b
Page: 10
Amoun
c
29,244.2z m
29,244.21 E
�a
a
a�
L
3
285.0(
285.0(
U
m
t
532.9z E
ca
55.4, U
0
R
2,667.8( o
L
a
20.0( Q
279.5< N
4
40.0( 4
3,595.65 N
E
M
U
25.9�
m
E
2.7( u
m
r
Q
A�
M.
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 136
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
252039
252040
4/14/2022
4/14/2022
076610
008812
076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued)
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR215300
AR215793
AR216583
AR216876
AR216881
7.5.b
Page: 11
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
Total:
35.9�
m
C5750 OVERAGE
E
bw overage 2/16 - 3/15/2022
Q
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
2.8( m
clr overage 2/16 - 3/15/2022
3
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
9.6(
clr overage 2/16 - 3/15/2022
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
9.6( Y
10.4% Sales Tax
U
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
1.2�
10.4% Sales Tax
E
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
1.0( 'M
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
1.0" O
clr overage 2/16 - 3/15/2022
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
9.61 o
COUNCIL COPIER USAGE
a
B/W and color usage for Council Can
Q
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
7.3, N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
001.000.11.511.60.45.00
0.7E
COLOR COPIER CHARGES A11617
4
0
Color copier charges for A11617
001.000.31.514.20.48.00
15.6E .
10.4% Sales Tax
fd
U
001.000.31.514.20.48.00
1.6< +:
AR216876 - ACCT MK5031 - EDMOI`
(D
3/22 A12434 & A12435 BW COPIES
E
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
67.9E m
3/22 A12434 & A12435 CLR COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
145.5E Q
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
22.4,
ENG COPIER MARCH 2O22
ENG COPIER MARCH 2O22
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 137
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 12
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252040
4/14/2022
008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
(Continued)
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
146.3�
10.5% Sales Tax
E
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
15.3 � a
AR216882
DEV SVCS - MONTHLY COPIER CO
L
Dev Svcs Copier (SN: 3AP01472)-
3
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
90.91,
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
9.5E Y
AR217008
AR217008 - EDMONDS PD
U
3/22 A11980 BW COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
17.7E E
3/22 A11980 CLR COPIES
R
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
107.5( u
10.5% Sales Tax
O
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
13.1E >
Total:
696.9: °
a
252041
4/14/2022
009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
EDH950647
E22CE/E22CF. RFQ AD
Q
E22CE. RFQ AD
N
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
115.2z N
E22CF. RFQ AD
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
115.21 c
Total:
230.4f w
E
252042
4/14/2022
067113 FAST WATER HEATER COMPANY
BLD2022-0423
DEV SVCS - PERMIT FEE REFUND
2
Permit BLD2022-0423-
U
001.000.257.620
105.0(
Total:
105.0( E
t
252043
4/14/2022
009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
1054223
WATER - PARTS/ AQUA GRIP END I
r
WATER - PARTS/ AQUA GRIP END I
Q
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
219.3(
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
22.8'
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 138
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 13
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252043
4/14/2022
009815 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued)
Total :
242.1'
m
252044
4/14/2022
072634 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
INV2010001244
SEWER - WORK WEAR T. NELSON
E
SEWER - WORK WEAR T. NELSON
sa
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
a
195.2E m
9.8% Sales Tax
3
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
19.1'
Total:
214.3E
252045
4/14/2022
075743 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
INV2060000187
WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA
1k
WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA
m
t
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
53.9E U
WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
53.9E U
10.3% Sales Tax
o
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
5.5E R
10.3% Sales Tax
o
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
5.5E a
Total :
119.0E Q
252046
4/14/2022
076462 GREAT FLOORS LLC
JB22-114622
F.A.C. - FLOORING
N
N
F.A.C. - FLOORING
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
4,619.9E 4
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
480.4E E
Total :
5,100.41 .M
U
252047
4/14/2022
012560 HACH COMPANY
12964846
WWTP: PO 796 REFRIGERATED BP
PO 796 REFRIGERATED BASE UNI-
m
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
2,812.3,
Freight
�a
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
313.0( Q
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
328.1(
Total :
3,453.4E
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 139
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 14
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252048
4/14/2022
012845
HARBOR SQUARE ATHLETIC CLUB
2022 MEMBERSHIP
2022 PD MEMBERSHIP
2022 PD MEMBERSHIP - 7 MEMBEF
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
6,300.0( �%
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
655.2( L
Total:
6,955.2( .3
252049
4/14/2022
061013
HONEY BUCKET
0552670917
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC
ea
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC
Y
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
240.3E u
Total:
240.3E
252050
4/14/2022
071642
HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC
14382
E20CE. SERVICES THRU 3/25/22
E
E20CE. SERVICES THRU 3/25/22
2
U
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
3,315.5; p
Total:
3,315.51,
252051
4/14/2022
075966
HULBERT, CARRIE
BID-0322ED
BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER MAF
a
BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER MAF
Q-
Q
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
2,766.6,
Total:
2,766.6, N
252052
4/14/2022
076488
HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG
BID-ED2022-03
BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY MARCH 2(
BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY MARCH 2(
o
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
600.0(
Total:
600.0(
252053
4/14/2022
069851
JACKYE'S JACKETS
24464
STREET/ STORM - WORK WEAR L(
+:
STREET/ STORM - WORK WEAR L(
(D
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
729.0' t
STREET/ STORM - WORK WEAR L(
m
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
728.9� Q
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
75.8,
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
75.8
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 140
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 15
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252053
4/14/2022
069851 069851 JACKYE'S JACKETS
(Continued)
Total :
1,609.6:
m
252054
4/14/2022
075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS
6925
FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC
E
Apr-2022 Fiber Optics Internet
Q
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
590.0( m
10.5% Sales Tax
3
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
61.91
Total:
651.9:
252055
4/14/2022
075265 KBA INC
3006607
EOMA. SERVICES THRU 3/31/22
k
EOMA. SERVICES THRU 3/31/22
m
t
332.000.64.594.76.41.00
27,259.6, U
EOMA. SERVICES THRU 3/31/22
E
125.000.64.594.76.41.00
8,142.4� U
Total :
35,402.11 0
252056
4/14/2022
066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC
10305
E198PO - PARTS/ PC EQUIPMENT E
o
E198PO - PARTS/ PC EQUIPMENT E
a
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
127.0( Q
Freight
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
13.5E N
10.5% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
14.7E 4
10339
E191 PO - PARTS/ MICROPHONE, H
E191 PO - PARTS/ MICROPHONE, H
E
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
219.9( .m
Freight
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
12.6,
10.5% Sales Tax
°'
E
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
24.4' u
Total:
412.2, r
Q
252057
4/14/2022
016850 KUKER RANKEN INC
INV-082725
PAINT PURCHASE - ENGINEERING
PAINT PURCHASE - ENGINEERING
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
39.6 ,
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 141
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
252057 4/14/2022 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC (Continued)
252058 4/14/2022 078892 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF DC GRANT 041222
252059 4/14/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING
252060 4/14/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC
47412735185
47416925185
01258
252061 4/14/2022 068489 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY GROUP INC 0261332
0261381
252062 4/14/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 369358
PO # Description/Account
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
Total :
DIVERSITY COMMISSION ON GRAI`
DIVERSITY COMMISSION ON GRAB
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
Total
INV 47412735185 - ACCT 2185-9521
SHRED 2 - 65 GAL TOTES
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
MARCH SHRED SERVICE
MARCH SHRED SERVICE
001.000.23.512.51.49.00
Total
INV 01258 - CS 22-4288 - EDMOND,'
TOW BLUE ACURA - CS 22-4288
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
Total
E196FM, E197FM, E204WQ, E205FP
E196FM, E197FM, E204WQ, E205FP
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
E201 PO - PARTS/ SPEAKER
E201 PO - PARTS/ SPEAKER
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Total
STREET - GARDEN SPRAYER, OIL
7.5.b
Page: 16
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 142
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252062 4/14/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
252063
252064
252065
4/14/2022 072151 MLA ENGINEERING PLLC
4/14/2022 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
4590
3276-939995
3276-941261
3276-950485
ICMI-01-1011*11
4/14/2022 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 6491164
7.5.b
Page: 17
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
STREET - GARDEN SPRAYER, OIL
d
E,
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
101.1E
10.4% Sales Tax
a
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
10.5, L
Total :
111.6f .3
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - PHA EVALW
ea
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - PHA EVALW
Y
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
2,583.5( u
Total:
2,583.5(
UNIT 6 - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS (RET
E
UNIT 6 - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS (RET
U
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
76.8£ p
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
8.0 1 o
UNIT 6 - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS RETI
a
UNIT 6 - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS RETI
Q
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-76.8£
10.5% Sales Tax
N
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-8.0,
UNIT 11 -PARTS/ HOOD CATCH
4
UNIT 11 -PARTS/ HOOD CATCH
c
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.1 . E
10.5% Sales Tax
fd
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
U
1.0E
FLEET - SUPPLIES/ STARTING FLU
FLEET - SUPPLIES/ STARTING FLU
E
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
9.3£ U
10.6% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
0.9� Q
Total:
21.5°
FAC MAINT - 6FT TEMPORARY PAN
FAC MAINT - 6FT TEMPORARY PAN
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 143
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
252065 4/14/2022 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS (Continued)
252066
252067
252068
PO # Description/Account
016.000.66.594.18.64.00
10.4% Sales Tax
016.000.66.594.18.64.00
Total
4/14/2022 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0649265-IN WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\
WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES/ GLO\
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total
4/14/2022 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N041580 UNIT 19 - PARTS
UNIT 19 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.9% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
4/14/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 236706178001 INV 236706178001 ACCT 90520437
PUBLIC WORKS - OFFICE SUPPLE;
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
236717934001 INV 236717934001 ACCT 90520437
PUBLIC WORKS - OFFICE SUPPLIE
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
7.5.b
Page: 18
Amoun
c
500.0(
52.0( a
552.0( L
3
c
45.4( Y
U
m
45.4(
E
7.7� o
�a
5.5< o
a
a
5.5' Q
117.4' N
N
4
0
69.9' N
E
6.9, 2
76.&
m
E
t
U
13.4�
Q
1.4(
33.9
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 144
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252068 4/14/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
252069 4/14/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER March, 2022
252070 4/14/2022 074148 OLSON, VIVIAN
252071 4/14/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
Dec 21
3685-196303
PO # Description/Account
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
Total :
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI`
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
001.000.237.120
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
Total
REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAINING
Leadership Snohomish County Qualit
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
Total
UNIT 11 - SUPPLIES/ GEAR LUBE
7.5.b
Page: 19
Amoun
c
3.5' >,
51% a
m
L
3
211.9(
5,991.5( U
t
U
893.5( E
94.0E
0
1,466.7(
0
L
424.6E Q
Q
190.7( N
N
11.1'
4
0
11.1' E
M
419.9, Z
533.6< 0
10,248.& E
U
m
Q
387.5(
387.5(
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 145
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 20
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252071
4/14/2022
072739
O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
(Continued)
UNIT 11 - SUPPLIES/ GEAR LUBE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
27.9E
10.6% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
2.9
Total:
30.9°
252072
4/14/2022
075735
PACIFIC SECURITY
40629
MARCH SECURITY
MARCH SECURITY
001.000.23.512.51.41.02
4,336.3:
Total :
4,336.3:
252073
4/14/2022
078895
PADILLA, TRACIE
04/11/2022
AUTHORIZATION TO TRAVEL TLP
NADCP RISE 2022 NASHVILLE - FLI
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
813.2(
NADCP RISE 2022 NASHVILLE - HC
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
1,383.9,
Total :
2,197.1:
252074
4/14/2022
071813
PEACOCK, WILLIAM R
2022T000025M
WWCPA CERTIFICATION TRAINING
WWCPA CERTIFICATION TRAINING
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
500.0(
Total :
500.0(
252075
4/14/2022
069633
PET PROS
162
INV 162 - EDMONDS PD - ACE
2 MONTHS FOOD - ACE
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
239.3E
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
25.1
Tota I :
264.5,
252076
4/14/2022
071783
PIGSKIN UNIFORMS
2022-16
2022-16 - EDMONDS PD - DANIELS
SUMMER WT JUMPSUIT W/EXTRA
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
590.0(
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
20.0(
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 146
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 21
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252076
4/14/2022
071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS
(Continued)
Sales Tax
E,
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
52.4E
Total:
662.4E a
m
252077
4/14/2022
064167 POLLARD WATER
0210213
WATER - SUPPLIES/ TRANSMITTEF
3
WATER - SUPPLIES/ TRANSMITTEF
421.000.74.534.80.35.00
1,660.0(
Freight
Y
421.000.74.534.80.35.00
21.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.35.00
174.8E E
WP025906
WATER - SUPPLIES/ MEASURING V
M
WATER - SUPPLIES/ MEASURING V
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
133.5( O
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
13.8� o
WP025909
WATER - SUPPLIES/ HIGH PRESSU
a
WATER - SUPPLIES/ HIGH PRESSU
Q
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
169.5E N
10.4% Sales Tax
N
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
17.6z
Total:
2,191.11 c
252078
4/14/2022
078800 POPA & ASSOCIATES
BID-3
BID/ED! COPYWRITING (PREP YOL
E
BID/ED! COPYWRITING (PREP YOl
fd
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
U
900.0(
Total:
900.0(
E
252079
4/14/2022
071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT
478084
INV 478084 - CUST 7522 - EDMOND
TAC RECEIVER PLATES - GUNS
r
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
110.5E Q
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
11.5(
Total :
122.01
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 147
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 22
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
252080
4/14/2022
077461 PUGET SOUND PLANTS INC
6453
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
r
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
c
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
1,072.5( �%
7.8% Sales Tax
a
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
83.6E L
Total:
1,156.1E .3
252081
4/14/2022
075770 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC
7900044080303286
POSTAGE MACHINE REFILL CHAR(
ea
Postage meter refill charge
Y
001.000.31.514.23.42.00
95.4E u
Total :
95.4<
252082
4/14/2022
030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
40271
VET SET CONCRETE COLLAR-THO
E
VET SET CONCRETE COLLAR - THi
2
U
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
162.0E p
Total :
162.0E Ta
252083
4/14/2022
071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC
456658
LIC# 303940 LPG AUX POWER GEI\
a
ANNUAL LEASE FOR LIC AGREEME
Q-
Q
423.000.75.535.80.45.00
1,148.7E
Total:
1,148.7E N
252084
4/14/2022
061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
3-0197-0800478
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
o
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
247.4;
3-0197-0800897
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
39.8,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
m
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
151.3, t
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
r
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
151.3, Q
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
151.3,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
151.3,
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 148
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252084 4/14/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
252085 4/14/2022 078857 S P KINNEY ENGINEERS INC
252086 4/14/2022 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL
252087 4/14/2022 078495 SAVATREE LLC
252088 4/14/2022 036955 SKY NURSERY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
3-0197-0801132
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
Total
24067V
WWTP: PO780 MODEL A STRAINEI
PO 780 MODEL A STRAINER PART
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
2495151 STORM - SPEEDCRETE
STORM-SPEEDCRETE
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
Freight
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
Total
10296004 DEV SVCS - PROF SVCS
Urban Tree Canopy Assessment-
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
Total
T-1970140 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
7.5.b
Page: 23
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 149
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252088 4/14/2022 036955 SKY NURSERY
252089 4/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 24
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
c
7.2�
Total:
78.OS E
�a
a
200326460
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
m
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
3
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
20.3'
200422418
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
Y
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
766.3E u
200663953
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
t
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
U
568.2E •ii
201103561
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
U
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
o
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
36.1- 1i
201501277
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
o
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
L
a
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
20.0' Q
201711785
STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15(
N
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @
N
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
8.6
202250635
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
4
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
19.0( E
202529186
STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @
R
STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
3,963.6,
202529202
STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40(
E
STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40
U
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
110.8E
202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C Q
STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,501.0-
202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 150
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252089 4/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714893
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714927
STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714935
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714943
STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10
STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
205307580
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
221593742
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
222398059
SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY,.
22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet -
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
222704272
WWTP: 3/8-4/5/22 FLOWMETER 10(
3/8-4/5/22 FLOW METER 2400 HIGI
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
222818874
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A)
Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
Total:
252090 4/14/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER March 2022
Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.237.140
Total
7.5.b
Page: 25
Amoun
c
379.8E
�a
a
6.1, L
�3
158.9(
U
0
86.7' u
E
M
18.9"
0
166.3� o
a
a
Q
81.3 , N
N
79.0" c
0
E
19.7z U
m
21.3E E
20,032.6' m
r
Q
139.8'
139.&
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 151
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 26
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252091
4/14/2022
038100 SNO-KING STAMP
69282
INV 69282 - EDMONDS PD
r
2 MAILBOX TAGS
c
E,
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
14.0(
Freight
a
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
4.2E L
10.5% Sales Tax
3
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
1.9E c
Total:
20.1E
252092
4/14/2022
075675 SORENSON FORENSICS LLC
49321
INV 49321 - MARCH 2O22 - EDMON[
U
MAR 22 PROPERTY CRIME BATCH
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
7,840.0( E
Total:
7,840.0( 'Fz
z
252093
4/14/2022
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103584
WWTP: ACCT 103584 - 3/2022 REC'
—
3/2022 Recycling + taxes
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
38.7.E o
201159
WWTP: ACCT #201159 - 3/2022 GA
a
3/2022 GARBAGE ACCT. 201159
Q
423.000.76.535.80.47.65
147.0
Total:
186.1, N
252094
4/14/2022
038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
126746/4
STORM - WORK WEAR T. MOLES
4
STORM - WORK WEAR T. MOLES
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
88.8E E
10.4% Sales Tax
M
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.2z U
Total:
98.1( r-
m
252095
4/14/2022
039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
L147747
03-2022 AUDIT FEES
t
03-2022 Audit Fees
001.000.39.514.20.41.50
r
3,105.6E Q
03-2022 Audit Fees
111.000.68.543.30.41.50
310.5 ,
03-2022 Audit Fees
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
931.7(
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 152
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252095
4/14/2022
039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
(Continued)
03-2022 Audit Fees
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
931.7(
03-2022 Audit Fees
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
931.7(
Total:
6,211.3°
252096
4/14/2022
040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
180027098-00
ROADWAY - BOLTS & NUTS
ROADWAY - BOLTS & NUTS
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
136.2F
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
14.1(
180034197-00
TRAFFIC - NUTS, BOLTS & WASHEI
TRAFFIC - NUTS, BOLTS & WASHEI
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
73.1(
10.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
7.6
Total:
231.2'
252097
4/14/2022
078891 TUBE ART GROUP
OS-141462
HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE
HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE
001.000.60.557.20.48.00
5,698.0(
Total:
5,698.0(
252098
4/14/2022
070774 ULINE INC
147378120
WWTP: PO 811 DUCT TAPE, MARK[
PO 811 DUCT TAPE, MARKERS TAC
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
310.6(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
47.6(
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
37.6
Tota I :
395.8'
252099
4/14/2022
073310 UNISAFE INC
714111
WWTP: PO 803 GLOVES
PO 803 GLOVES
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
349.8(
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 153
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252099 4/14/2022 073310 UNISAFE INC
252100
252101
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
4/14/2022 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 266182
4/14/2022 075506 US BANK
267004
6208503
6208504
�ii�7i1+7
7.5.b
Page: 28
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
Freight
d
E,
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
19.9E
Total:
369.7f a
m
STORM & PARKS DUMP FEES
3
STORM - DUMP FEES/ CLEAN CON
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
271.5"
PARKS - DUMP FEES/ DIRTY BRUS
Y
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
761.4( u
STORM & PARKS DUMP FEES
PARKS - DUMP FEES/ CLEAN & DIF
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
634.5"
STORM - DUMP FEES/ CLEAN ASP[
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
216.7E O
Total:
1,884.2(
0
EDMLTGOI9 ADMINISTRATION FEE
a
City of Edmonds Limited Tax General
Q
126.000.39.592.75.89.00
300.0(
EDMLTGOREF12 ADMINISTRATION
N
City of Edmonds Limited General
4
001.000.39.592.18.89.00
211.6E 4
City of Edmonds Limited General
N
126.000.39.592.75.89.00
79.8� E
City of Edmonds Limited General
fd
423.100.76.592.35.89.00
U
8.4E
EDMWATREF11 ADMINISTRATION [
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer
E
421.000.74.592.34.89.00
183.0( U
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer
422.000.72.592.31.89.00 87.0( Q
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer
423.000.75.592.35.89.00 27.0(
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer
423.000.76.592.35.89.00 3.0(
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 154
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 29
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252101
4/14/2022 075506 US BANK
(Continued)
6208506
EDMWATSEW13 ADMINISTRATION
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer RE
>%
421.000.74.592.34.89.00
105.0( a
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer RE
L
.3
422.000.72.592.31.89.00
18.0(
City of Edmonds Water and Sewer RE
423.000.75.592.35.89.00
177.0(
6208507
EDMWATSEW15 ADMINISTRATION
Y
City of Edmonds WA Water and Sew(
U
421.000.74.592.34.89.00
90.0( r-
City of Edmonds WA Water and Sew(
E
422.000.72.592.31.89.00
60.0( n
City of Edmonds WA Water and Sew(
,U
423.000.75.592.35.89.00
150.0( _0
6208508
EDMWSREV20 ADMINISTRATION F
>
City of Edmonds WA Water and Sew(
423.000.76.592.35.89.00
491.5" a
Total :
1,991.51 Q
252102
4/14/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK
924826
WWTP: PO 772 HACH NITRIFICATI(
N
N
PO 772 HACH NITRIFICATION INHIE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
202.8E c
Freight
U)
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
14.4z .E
10.4% Sales Tax
fd
U
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
22.6( +:
Total:
239.9:
E
252103
4/14/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
9903087161
C/A 442201730-00001
U
iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
35.1 , Q
Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
26.5,
Total:
61.6'
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 155
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
252104 4/14/2022 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC
252105
252106
252107
252108
4/14/2022 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
8808046236
201136141
4/14/2022 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 3-2022
4/14/2022 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS
4/14/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
122-259
8154
PO # Description/Account
WWTP: PO 773 KIMWIPES
PO 773 KIMWIPES
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total :
INV 201136141 - EDMONDS PD
RED DOT INSTRUCT TRNG BORST
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
RED DOT INSTRUCT TRNG ALLEN
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
RED DOT INSTRUCT TRNG CLARK
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
Total
PMT 9 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF
PMT 9 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
PMT 9 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Total
TREE - GRIND STUMP LEAVE MUL(
TREE - GRIND STUMP LEAVE MUL(
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
Total
BUSINESS CARDS - ENGINEERING
BUSINESS CARDS - ENGINEERING
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
7.5.b
Page: 30
Amoun
c
167.6z >,
�a
a
17.4; L
185.0 , .3
c
ea
400.0( U
t
U
400.0( E
400.0(
1,200.0( O
R
0
L
a
34,536.1 , Q
N
3,453.6( N
37,989.7,
4
0
E
400.0( .2
U
41.6(
441.6( E
t
U
m
r
-3011
6.5E
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 156
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
252108 4/14/2022 073552 073552 WELCO SALES LLC (Continued)
252109 4/14/2022 077188 WELCOME MAGAZINE 1704 LTAC
252110 4/14/2022 065936 WESSPUR TREE EQUIPMENT INC IN-2694837
252111 4/14/2022 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH
252112 4/14/2022 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS
252113 4/14/2022 078389 ZENNER USA
2498515
0000050972
PO # Description/Account
Total :
SPRING/SUMMER AD 2022 IN WED
SPRING/SUMMER AD 2022 IN WED
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
Total
STREET/ STORM - HARD HAT & HE
STREET/ STORM - HARD HAT & HE
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
Freight
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
Total
INV 2498515 - JAN & FEB 2022 - ED
JAN & FEB 2022 RANGE FEES
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
Total
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ RRFB'S FOR
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ RRFB'S FOR
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Total
0066464-IN WATER - INVENTORY
WATER - INVENTORY
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
0066537-IN WATER - INVENTORY-
7.5.b
Page: 31
Amoun
69.5E
m
E
�a
a
3,456.0( m
3,456.0( 3
c
N
702.8E
m
t
12.1E U
2
74.3E U
789.4( o
R
0
a
521.6( Q
54.4( N
576.0(
4
0
E
14,981.2E
1,558.0E
16,539.1
t
U
m
r
4,854.0( Q
307.4<
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 157
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.b
Page: 32
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
252113
4/14/2022 078389 ZENNER USA
(Continued)
WATER - INVENTORY-
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
2,418.5( �%
Freight
a
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
308.4E L
Total:
7,888.31 .3
252114
4/14/2022 051280 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
9007289282
FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES
ea
FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES
Y
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
128.5E u
Freight
U
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
24.9E E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
_M
15.9, z
Total:
169.51 O
252115
4/14/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
206-188-0247
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
Ta
0
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
a
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
272.2E Q
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
N
272.2E N
425-774-1031
LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI
LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRAI
4
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
0
47.5E N
425-776-1281
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
E
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
fd
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
U
58.2E
425-776-5316
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
E
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
110.2.E U
Total:
760.51
Q
104
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
683,274.7-,,
104
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
683,274.7-,,
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 158
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:00:48AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
7.5.b
Page: 33
Amoun
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 159
7.5.c
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
4142022 4/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
0
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
0747
PW CC - 04/06/2022
d
AMAZON - SEWER SUPPLIES HEX
E
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
26.1 E
AMAZON - SEWER PRESSURE WA
m
423.000.75.535.80.35.00
1,543.3E 3
AMAZON - SEWER SUPPLIES HEX
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
44.5E
AMAZON - SEWER CAMERA SKID
N
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
140.2-
AMAZON - PW SUPPLIES PHONE C
t
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
34.1 E U
ITUNES MONTHLY CHARGE FOR IC
001.000.65.518.20.49.00
0.9�
0881
UMC CC MARCH 2O22
0
COSTCO - LUNCH PRODUCTS FOP
'R
001.000.23.512.51.42.00
27.9E o
AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES
L
Q-
001.000.23.512.51.35.10
a
175.5z Q
AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES
N
001.000.23.512.51.31.10
1,136.7< N
2686
MONITORS, DRONE REGISTRATIOI
r
Costco - 75" Samsung monitors TU7(
c
512.100.31.518.88.35.00
1,876.7E
Amazon - SanDisk Flash drives 16GE
3
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
56.4E };
Amazon - SanDisk 64GB Ultra Dual C
a�
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
16.5E E
FAA Drone Zone registration
U
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
10.0(
2969
COUNCIL VISA SUPPLIES & TRANII
Q
JOANN Paper supplies for council off
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
6.1-
Trader Joes - supplies for council
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
21.4,
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 160
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
4142022 4/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.c
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
Office Depot - supplies for council
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
39.0- E
Safeway - supplies for council chamb
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
6.4�
Jurrassic Parliament - Crash Course 1
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
47.0(
Beacon Publishing - renewal for Edmi
001.000.11.511.60.49.00
59.9E N
2985
WWTP: PENALTY FINE, WITE OUT,
PSCAA: Penalty
t
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
375.0( U
#2: Amazon: W ite Out $12.45 + $3.2E
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
13.7z Z
#3 & #4: Amazon: $232.50 + $61.12 t
p
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
293.6, R
#5 Amazon: Pens $6.89 + $0.72 tax
0
0
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
7.6- o.
#6: Amazon: Headset for Michael D
CL
a
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
240 .�
Amazon: Typing Chair for Rick $154.,
N
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
154.7( r
3355
MOLES CC - 04/06/2022
4
CABLE ORGANIZER - TRAFFIC SUF
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
521.7E 3
4210
BUSINESS MEETING
business lunch: Nelson/Feser
a�
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
42.7< E
4697 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE t
plants
001.000.60.557.20.49.00 33.0 1 a
double stick tape
001.000.21.513.10.31.00 13.7�
NO opening reception
001.000.60.557.20.49.00 124.9�
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 161
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
4142022 4/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.c
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
NO reception file cabinet
001.000.60.557.20.49.00
198.3f E
meeting refreshments
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
22.0(
Canva subs. April 2022
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
12.9E
meeting refreshments
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
19.8, N
adj. desk NO courtroom
001.000.60.557.20.35.00
76.1 E t
4929 US BANK - DEV SVCS
U
Amazon - Dev Svcs supplies-
E
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
54.0z Z
Amazon: Dev Svcs Misc Supplies-
o
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
67.3z R
Click2Mail-
0
0
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
102.9E o.
Amazon: Dev Svcs misc office supplif
a
Q
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
57.3E .�
Amazon: Dev Svcs office supplies-
N
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
19.41 r
WSAPT - Membership renewal-
c
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
45.0(
Amazon: Dev Svcs office supplies-
3
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
15.4E };
WSAPT - Spring 2022 Conference RE
a�
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
150.0( E
International Code Council-
U
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
95.0(
Adobe Creative Cloud monthly Q
001.000.62.524.10.49.00 58.5(
Adobe Creative Cloud Monthly
001.000.62.524.10.49.00 58.5(
Michaels -
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 162
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
4142022 4/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.c
Page: 4
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
613.9z r-
MailChimp - monthly subscription-
E
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
25.4,
Amazon: Dev Svcs Minor Equip-
001.000.62.524.10.35.00
m
60.7E .3
Amazon - Dev Svcs supplies-
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
6.6(
5923
CS/ECON DEV CREDIT CARD MAR(
y
Duct Tape for Hwy 99 Neighborhood
001.000.60.557.20.49.00
3.0£ t
Hwy 99 Neighborhood Office - Coffee
U
001.000.60.557.20.49.00
59.4.E •�
OfficeSpace website listing for
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
100.0( p
Luttrell - Keyboard & Mouse
'R
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
71.7E p
Luttrell - MRSC Losing Tax Basics
Q.
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
35.0( Q
6654
SULLIVAN CC - 04/06/2022
.�
CITY OF EDMONDS - NEIGHBORHC
N
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
444.7z r
FAB GLASS & MIRROR - YOST PAR
4
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
318.1.E
8017
ENG CREDIT CARD MARCH 2O22
3
EOMA.sign permits
332.000.64.594.76.41.00
304.1E
EOMA.sign permits
E
125.000.64.594.76.41.00
90.8E U
E21 FD.plan review
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
740.0( Q
E21 GA.plan review
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
740.0(
Amazon. Hose clamps for Engineerin
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
8.7E
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 163
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
4142022 4/14/2022 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.c
Page: 5
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
-�
Transoft. AutoTURN map renewal. 1
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
552.0( E
WDOL. DeLilla PE license renewal 2(
�a
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
116.0(
MRSC Roster service renewal
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
275.0(
8842
GFOA WEBINAR FOR D SHARP
GFOA - Correctly Calculating Net
N
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
35.0(
9573
TRAVEL FOR CONFERENCE, DUO ;
t
Duo.com - MFA monthly qty 100 -
U
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
14.0( •�
Expedia - Booking fee
001.000.31.514.20.43.00
3.21 p
Alaska Air - Flight to 2022 GFOA
R
001.000.31.514.20.43.00
188.6( p
Alaska Air - Flight home from 2022 GI
Q.
001.000.31.514.20.43.00
188.6( Q
Duo.com - MFA monthly qty 100-
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
300.0( N
9644
OXG CC MARCH 2O22
T
PASSPORT POSTAGE
4
001.000.23.512.51.42.00
35.8(
MISDEMEANENT PROBATION MEM
3
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
215.0(
PASSPORT POSTAGE
a�
001.000.23.512.51.42.00
17.9( E
MISDEMEANENT PROBATION REGI
t
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
200.0(
CORRECTIONAL COUNSELING - OI
Q
001.000.23.523.30.43.00 628.0(
Total : 14,319.4;
Bank total : 14,319.4'
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 164
vchlist
04/14/2022 11:19:44AM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.5.c
Page: 6
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
Total vouchers : 14,319.4; -�
c
a�
E
�a
a
m
L
3
c
�a
N
Y
V
d
t
V
E
M
V
4-
0
O
O
L
Q
Q
a
N
N
T
4
0
a)
L
3
c
a�
E
U
a
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 165
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
E8FB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
2018 Lorian Woods StuclylMlill
s018
E8FA
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
E8GA
■ STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Projec
c525
E8FC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
E8JA
STIR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STIR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update qF
s02O
E8JB
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
STIR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STIR
ZUZU Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STIR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STIR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STIR
2020 Waterline Overlay
iO53
EOCC
STIR
2021 Guardrail Installations
iO57
E21AB
STIR
2021 Overlay Program
051
E21 CA
STIR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i062
E21 DB
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i06O
E21CC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STIR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059
E21CB
STIR
2022 Guardrail Program
i073
E22AC
STIR
2022 Overlay Prey
i063
E22CA
STIR
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
i072
E22DA
STIR
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC
STIR
2022 Signal Upgrades
i07O
E22AA
STIR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
i066
E22CD
STIR
2022 Traffic Calming Program
071
E22AB
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
s03O
E22NB
STIR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
i064
E22CB
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
E8AB
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramos
iO37
E8DC
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STIR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
iO52
E20CB
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
E8CA
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
E8CC
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
E8DB
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
iO4O
E9DA
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals AW
i024
E7AB
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STIR
Bikelink Project I
c474
E5DA
STIR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i05O
EODC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase IJ1W
c488
E6GB
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
015
E6AB
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 166
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
ESTM -Wayton Street Stormwater Pump Station '
c455
E4FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
STM
Edmonds MarshWater Quality Project
c564
E21FE
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
STIR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coati
c473
ESKA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
STIR
Hwy 99 Gate
s014
E6AA
STIR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
i067
E22CE
STIR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
i068
E22CF
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
SVT
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s011
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
SWR
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
c566
E22GA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
WTR
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
c565
E22JA
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
E21 FD
STM
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c567
E22FA
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E91VIA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21 GB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
STIR
SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_
i069
E22CG
STIR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
055
E20CE
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
010
ESNA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1DA
�M,ackside
Warning System
c470
ESAA
UTILITIES
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
s029
E22NA
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th
i044
E9DC
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E71VIA
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E71VIA
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
m160
E22JB
Yost Park Infiltration Facili
c556
E21 FA
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 167
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
STR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installati�
STR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calmin
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
STR
EOCC
i053
2020 Waterline Overlay
STR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
STR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STR
EODC
050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
c548
Phase 8 4&Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
EOJB
s026
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
PRK
EOMA
c536
_&LCenter Playfield (Design JW '
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
STR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR
E20CB
iO52
St. to OVD)
STR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvemen
STR
E21 AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STR
E21AB
iO57
2021 Guardrail Installations
STR
E21CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
E21CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i06O
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
Moor
E21 IIIIHATCD
i061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
E21 DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility _
TM
E21 FB
c560
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
STM
E21 FD
c563
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21 FIE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
E21GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
q1RVTR
E21JA
c558
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
STR
E22AA
i07O
2022 Signal Upgrades
STR
E22AB
071
2022 Traffic Calming Program
STR
E22AC
i073
70
2022 Guardrail Program
J�
STR
E22CA
i063
2022 Overlay Program
STR
E22CB
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STIR
E22CD
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
STR
E22CF
i068
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
STR
E22CG
i069
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
lllrE22DA
i072
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
STM
E22FA
c567
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
OEM-E22GA
c566
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E22JA
c565
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
E22JB
m160
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
UTILITIES
E22NA
s029
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 168
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
UTILITIES
E22NB
s030
2022 Utility Rate and GFC St
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
STR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
STR
An
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
SWR
E5GB
sol l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5,113
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR
E51KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
(TIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Update
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR
E6AB
i015 Citywide Protected/PPrmi%1b Traffic Signal Conversion
STR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7AC
i005
Akh St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STR
E7DC
i026
Citywi a Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
WTR
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
PRK
c496 _,_Q(aterfront
Development & Restoration (Design)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
9WAB
_
STR
i028
220th Adaptive
STR
E8CA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E8CC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR
E8DB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STR
E8DC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STM
E8FA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES
E8JB
s02o
AL Utility Rate & GFC Update
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
i038
2019 Traffic Ca mmg
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
WTR
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. 7alkway(3rd-4th)
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 169
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
STIR
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Ouffall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5J13
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
PRK
E21FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
WTR
E21JA
c558
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
STM
E21FB
c560
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
SWR
E21GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
STM
E21FD
c563
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STM
E21FE
c564
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
WTR
E22JA
c565
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
SWR
E22GA
c566
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
E22FA
c567
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E713C
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STIR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
STIR
E8CA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 170
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
STR
EBCC
031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway(3rd-4th)
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STR
E21 CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
STR
E20CB
i052
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STR
EOCC
i053
2020 Waterline Overlay
STR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STR
E21 AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STR
E21AB
i057
2021 Guardrail Installations
STR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
WTR
E21CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
STM
E21 CD
i061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E21 DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
STR
E22CA
i063
2022 Overlay Program
STR
E22CB
i064
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
STR
E22CC
i065
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
STR
E22CD
i066
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
STR
E22CF
i068
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
STR
E22CG
i069
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
STR
E22AA
i070
2022 Signal Upgrades
STR
E22AB
i071
2022 Traffic Calming Program
STR
E22DA
i072
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
STR
E22AC
i073
2022 Guardrail Program
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
WTR
E22JB
m160
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
ESGB
s0l l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
STM
E9FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
STR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
WTR
EOJB
s026
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
UTILITIES
E22NA
s029
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
UTILITIES
E22NB
s030
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 171
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c567
E22FA
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21CD
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STM
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
c563
E21 FD
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STM
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
c564
E21 FE
STIR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STIR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STIR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STIR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STIR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STIR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STIR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STIR
2021 Guardrail Installations
i057
E21 AB
STIR
2021 Overlay Program
051
E21 CA
STIR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STIR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
i052
E20CB
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STIR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th)
i067
E22CE
STIR
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
i068
E22CF
STIR
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
i069
E22CG
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 172
7.5.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STIR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
050
EODC
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
015
E6AB
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
STIR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
058
E21 DA
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
017
E6DD
STIR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
i055
E20CE
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STIR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
STIR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
061
E21 DB
STIR
2022 Overlay Program
i063
E22CA
STIR
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
i064
E22CB
STIR
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
i065
E22CC
STIR
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
i066
E22CD
STIR
2022 Signal Upgrades
i070
E22AA
STIR
2022 Traffic Calming Program
i071
E22AB
STIR
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
i072
E22DA
STIR
2022 Guardrail Program
i073
E22AC
STIR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i060
E21CC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0l l
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21GA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21 GB
SWR
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
c566
E22GA
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
EBJB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
UTILITIES
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
s029
E22NA
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
s03O
E22NB
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
059
E21CB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
WTR
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
c565
E22JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
m160
E22JB
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
Revised 4/14/2022 Packet Pg. 173
7.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Lacey Gray
Staff Lead: NA
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Lacey Gray
Narrative
Lacey Gray
121 5th Ave N
($500,000.00)
Attachments:
Claim for Damages - Lacey Gray - for council
Packet Pg. 174
7.6.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
Please take note that Tarey Gray , who currently resides at
mailing address
home phone K ]work phone #
Date Claim Form
Received by City
and who resided at above address
at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is , , is claiming d"ap7s/
against the C i t u of F`.aTn n dgn the sum of $ 500 , 000 . 00 arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE:Pnr at- 1 pAst- the = aGt 2 years TIME:
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: City of Edmonds
DESCRIPTION:
Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage
Claimant c
activities and auffered
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
All witnesses are em_plgvees of the City of 28mnn84 whoge_a.rldres-s-e-s--a.n-fl
Phone_ numbers are known to the y; D&yid TurieV, Nick Faiijk,�SCott�athE
Jessica Nei l—Hoysen , Susan Quan , C} elspa Mer; tfTand at_her-s
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
N/A
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes X No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY
License Plate # Driver License #
Type Auto:
(year) (make) (model)
DRIVER: OWNER:
Address: Address:
Phone#: Phone#:
Passengers:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
m
E
L
0
E
U
ng
Fann Revised 04/09/2021 Page I of 2
Packet Pg. 175
7.6.a
This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a wrlllen power of attorney from the Claimant, by the
attorney in fact for the Claimant, by all attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a
court -approved guardian OF guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing Is true and correct,
lign4atwu7��f ►»ant 0 Date nd p ce (msidantial addross, city and county)
Or
Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county)
Print Name of Representative Bar Number (ff applicable)
Please present the completed claim form to: City. Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 51" Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8.00 a.m. to 4:30'p.m.
Firm RcuiHd Q.jr09r�i3i!f
E
U
Page 2 of Z
Packet Pg. 176
7.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Written Public Comments
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Public comments submitted to email address publiccomments@edmondswa.gov between March 29 and
April 14, 2022.
Attachments:
20220419 public comments
Packet Pg. 177
7.7.a
Public Comments for City Council Meeting 04/19/22
Subject: Re: Interim Design Standards and PLN2021-0066
Would you please put my letter on public record for the City Council Meeting on March 29,
2022
Thank you,
Lynda Fireman
From: Lynda Fireman
Sent: March 28, 2022 1:22 PM
To: Olson, Vivian <Vivian. Olson&edmondswa. gov>; Susan McLaughlin, Director
<susan.mclau hg lin(a edmondswa.gov>; Kernen Lien <kernen.lien(a),edmondswa.gov>; Mike E
E
Nelson <michael.nelson&edmondswa.gov>; council&edmondswa.gov c
<council(d),edmondswa.gov> V
Subject: Re: Interim Design Standards and PLN2021-0066 2
a
Thank you for responding.
L
I see this moratorium as a thinly veiled attempt to appease the public outcry which has mainly
focused on the size and look of the proposed building from Main Street. It does not go far
enough. Nothing is addressing the real issue here which is, as stated in PLN2021-0066: a
"Structures on the adjacent parcels do not support the intensity of development under the
current zoning and comprehensive plan and are anticipated to eventually be replaced with
higher -density development. The proposed project is seen as a guide for future
redevelopment allowed and encouraged by the comprehensive plan".
Page 184 of the Council Agenda , Section 2 states:
Moratorium Imposed. The city council hereby imposes a two -month moratorium on the
acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the DB2 zone that does not
front on a designated street front, PROVIDED THAT the moratorium shall not apply to
building permit applications for projects that are categorically exempt from SEPA review.
Does this mean PLN2021-0066 is exempt as their building permit applications were in several
months ago? Does any of this actually address the problems with PLN2021-0066?
Page 179 of the Council Agenda states:
"This interim code change is very narrowly focused given the time and resources available
and did not involve comprehensive analysis of multifamily design standards throughout the
City. The multifamily design standard project anticipated for 2022 will take a broad look at
multifamily areas throughout Edmonds and will revisit these interim standards as well."
Packet Pg. 178
7.7.a
When are the time and resources going to be given to this issue? The time should be now.
If this pertains to PLN2021-0066, the Moratorium is only giving lip service and is allowing the
developer to move ahead with the project. It is only addressing the "street side" as there are
"holes in the code" and now, as well, it is going to reward the developer by allowing a roof top
deck so he can say that they can have a view and therefore set higher rents, when this 40 ft ,
straight up, solid wall on the lot line of the alley blocks all light and visibility of the
surroundings on all sides of the alley and creates a situation where our safety is at risk while
we try to exit out garages. As well, moving trucks will be blocking the alley continually. An alley
is a public right of way, not a parking lot or a setback.
Both the current zoning and comprehensive plan are faulty and should have been addressed c
years ago. The moratorium doesn't go far enough. This building is too large and too dense for E
this small lot. It does not fit into this landscape. It creates visual pollution and both pedestrian c
and vehicle safety Issues. U
Please just stop this development in its tracks and address the issues properly. I know the city a
is worried about a law suit from the developer because there are gaps in the code. Please think
r
ahead and worry more about the city's responsibility if there is a serious accident and bodily
harm in the alley.
I turned on the TV yesterday and saw a repeat of Mayor Nelson stating his "2022 Priorities for
Our City". They are:
Making Edmonds More Livable and Accessible
2. Building to Connections to improve Public Safety
3. New Vision of Public Spaces
I don't see any of those priorities being addressed here. Just more lip service.
Sincerely,
Lynda Fireman
My name is Michelle Dotsch, resident of Edmonds
A local respected architect for well over 20 years, who has dedicated the majority of his
professional career to the analysis and design of building envelope systems, reviewed the staff s
additional design standards and had these comments, which I will now relay to you as he is
unable to participate tonight:
2
Packet Pg. 179
7.7.a
"I read the 22.43.080 Additional Design Standards you sent. My opinions are an attempt to work
within the ideas these new Additional Design Standards address. My opinions:
1. Intent: This statement is too broad in nature. "Compatible" is meaningless without further
parameters. Such items as, building to human scale by vertical and horizontal
modulation; building step backs after a certain height and other defining parameters must
be included to make an intent statement.
2. Item 3 "Balconies": this; as written is a concern. This is an encroachment into setbacks
that can be exploited without further definition. Should the deck encroachment be
allowed, guardrails should be transparent to lessen their visual impact. Decks
encroaching into setbacks should be limited to the 2nd floor only. Upper floor setbacks as
indicated in my #1 above will then have decks that do not enter the setback.
3. Also item 3: Decks at grade encroaching into setbacks shouldn't be allowed. Patios on
E
grade are okay if associated with landscaping requirements.
v
4. Item 4: Roof decks: Roof decks can work well. The decks should only be within the
2
middle portions of the building roof footprint. Roof decks should be setback from the
3
roof edges a minimum of 5 feet. This will eliminate the ability to see into windows of
adjacent buildings. The roof decks must also have a landscape requirement.
5. Also item 4: the last sentence: No permanent structures are allowed within the roof deck
area means there can be no roof deck access. Without access there can be no roof deck.
An elevator for disabled people and an exit stair for smaller roof decks are required by
the Building Code. Roof decks exceeding 150 square feet require two separate exits. The
towers extend the building height. This visual effect will be lessened or eliminated with
stairs and elevators set to the interior portion of the building/roof.
6. I believe the 22.43.080 standards can work with further thought and definition. The above
opinions can be helpful in making the City's Design Standards work for scale and making
more interesting building designs for the BD2 Zone."
Thank you for your time and consideration of his professional opinion.
From:
Joan Bloom
Sent:
Tuesday, March 29, 2022 2:08 PM
To:
Council; Public Comment (Council)
Subject:
Submission of written public comments
Council,
I am writing in support of Council continuing to allow written public comments printed
in the public record. I have appreciated being able to carefully word my comments and
know that they will be included in the public record as written. Comment summaries are
3
Packet Pg. 180
7.7.a
helpful, and historically well done by the City Clerk, but they do not take the place of
having a citizen's exact words in the public record.
Further, providing as many options for comments to be submitted as possible is critical,
given issues of scheduling conflicts, lack of access to commenting via zoom and/or
preference not to attend in -person meetings. Continuing submission of written
comments will demonstrate that you value comments from all, regardless of how they
choose to present them.
I understand the rationale for staff's recommendation that a web form be used to limit
to the approximate length of a 3 minute comment. May I assume that since the form will
be copied to Council, that Council members will be able to reply directly to the
commenter?
E
E
0
V
1 also understand the rationale for using a separate agenda memo item, rather than
"appending them to the official minutes" and believe this would highlight the comments
a.
sent weekly and reduce the time involved in searching to see if your comment has been
a
documented.
Thank you for considering my input in you decision making.
Respectfully,
Joan Bloom
M
Packet Pg. 181
7.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Confirm Appointment of Candidate to a board/commission
Staff Lead: Carolyn LaFave
Department: Mayor's Office
Preparer: Carolyn LaFave
Background/History
Architectural Design Board Position #7, Planner, is currently open due to a retirement. Mayor Nelson
interviewed candidate Corbitt Loch and is recommending his appointment.
Staff Recommendation
Confirm appointment of Corbitt Loch to ADB Position #7, Planner.
Narrative
Mr. Loch's education and experience in Planning provide the qualifications necessary to fill the Planner
position on the ADB.
Packet Pg. 182
7.9
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Confirm Appointment of Candidate to a board/commission
Staff Lead: Carolyn LaFave
Department: Mayor's Office
Preparer: Carolyn LaFave
Background/History
Architectural Design Board Position #1, Architect, is currently open due to a resignation. Mayor Nelson
interviewed candidate Steve Schmitz and is recommending his appointment.
Staff Recommendation
Confirm appointment of Steve Schmitz to ADB Position #1, Architect.
Narrative
Mr. Schmitz has the necessary qualifications for the ADB Architect position and is interested in
volunteering in this capacity.
Packet Pg. 183
7.10
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Human Services Program Manager Position Revision
Staff Lead: Shannon Burley
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Shannon Burley
Background/History
In 2020 the City established a Human Services Division and hired a Human Services Program Manager on
a part-time (20 hours per week) basis. The Program Manager reported to the Department of Economic
Development and Community Services (job description attached). In April 2021 the Division and part-
time position moved to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department.
An ongoing allocation of $130,546 for salary + benefits was approved in 2022 Human Services operating
budget, which is more than adequate to cover the costs of this position increasing to full time. In 2021,
the part-time Human Services Program Manager salary expense was $42,518.
This request was evaluated by the Personnel Committee and authorized to be brought forward on
consent in the April 12, 2022 meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize additional 20 hours per week for the Human Services Program Manager. This is not a request
for additional funding or for a position description change.
Narrative
The Human Service Program Manager position has developed community collaborations and
partnerships with numerous program providers and professional organizations in order to provide
efficient coordination of services for Edmonds residents. Those agencies include but are not limited to:
St. Vincent DePaul, Edmonds Food Bank, 211, Verdant Health, local faith -based organizations,
Volunteers of America, the Lynnwood Hygiene Center, We All Belong Cold Weather Shelter, YWCA
Pathways Shelter, local first responders (police and fire), Everett Gospel Mission, the Hand Up Project,
Housing Hope and more.
Further, the Program Manager participates in local, Snohomish County -wide, and region -wide
conversations around Human Services supporting the alignment of City and regional priorities serving as
the City's representative for the National Low -Income Housing Coalition (as a Board Member), the
Washington Low Income Housing Alliance (as a Board Member and Public Policy Committee Member),
the Snohomish County Partnership on Ending Homelessness Board, the Snohomish County Community
Services Advisory Council, the Homeless Policy Taskforce for Snohomish County, the YWCA Public Policy
Committee, the Puget Sound Regional Council Equity Advisory Committee and the Statewide Steering
Committee for Rental Assistance and Performance Measures.
Packet Pg. 184
7.10
The Program Manager is responsible for originating and developing innovative programs and projects
that address critical and emergent human services needs in Edmonds and has developed programs such
as the Urgent Needs Program in collaboration with Edmonds Police Department, supporting the
establishment of household support grants utilizing CARES and ARPA funding, leveraging relationships to
set up COVID vaccine programs such as the homebound senior vaccine initiative and more. Further the
Program Manager supervises the City's motel voucher program in collaboration with the Department of
Commerce.
In the absence of a dedicated Social Worker the Human Services Program Manager has also been
coordinating services to the extent possible for many Edmonds Residents (178 residents in 2021).
The Compass Health Social Worker once hired, will spend the majority of their time in the field with
Edmonds Police Department meeting unsheltered residents where they are and seeking to establish
trust and eventually seeking shelter and services for those individuals. The Program Manager will remain
focused on crisis prevention, working to meet the needs of individuals before they reach homelessness.
Further, the Human Services Program Manager will work to establish partnerships with DSHS and 211 to
streamline intake and develop programs with non -profits such as a house sharing organization as
suggested by Council President Olson and Kone Consulting.
The demand for the Human Service Program Manager's time far exceeds the allocated 20 hours per
week. The Human Service Program Manager position is part of the AFSME bargaining unit and it is staff's
recommendation to allocate an additional 20 hours per week (approximately $53K per year) moving this
position to full-time. This will NOT require an increase in budget allocation, the increase is covered by
the presently adopted ongoing budget allocation.
Attachments:
Human Services Program Manager JD
Packet Pg. 185
7.10.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Human Services Program Manager
Department:
Community Services
Pay Grade:
NR-10*
Bargaining Unit:
AFSME*
FLSA Status:
Non-exempt
Revised Date:
01/08/2020
Reports To:
Community Services Director
*This position's wages were established on the non -represented scale. It was later determined this position
qualifies for AFSCME membership. Wages will be bargained on the AFSCME scale with the next union contract
negotiations.
POSITION PURPOSE:
The Human Services Program Manager is a key City position that is responsible for assisting citizens by connecting
to currently available human services programs, assisting in the navigation of processes required to receive
services, and advocating for human and civil rights. The incumbent will be key in developing relationships with
human services program providers, evaluating currently available services and programs, and advocating for new
services and programs to improve the lives of the citizens of Edmonds.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees
in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may
not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties.
• Develop the City's Human Services Program to include analysis of current human services offerings,
development of internal City processes to connect citizens to human services support programs, and
establishing relationships with program providers, professional organizations, and groups that impact the
human services available in the City of Edmonds
• Plan, organize and manage the Human Services Program for the City.
• Develop and administer an annual work plan to include the City's human service, priorities, establishing
and updating of policies and identification of external programs that meet priorities or that will need to be
established in order to meet priorities.
• Originate and develop innovative programs and projects in addressing critical and emergent human
Service needs in the community;
• Understand, measure, analyze and respond to community needs on an ongoing basis. Advocate for and
support a systems approach to meeting the community needs.
• Assist citizens and community agencies in developing programs to respond to community needs;
coordinate with local agencies to provide assistance to citizens in need.
• Foster the development of community collaborations and partnerships to provide human services to
Edmonds residents. Provide networking opportunities for human service providers and facilitate
relationship development among them.
• Present reports to the Director, Mayor, City Council, and citizens groups.
• Oversee and develop resource and referral information and brochures to assist citizens in need or
citizens seeking to help others in need;
Human Services Program Manager Last Reviewed: 06/08/2021
Last Revised: 01/08/2020
Packet Pg. 186
7.10.a
2 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Human Services Program Manager
• Represent the City of Edmonds on regional and sub -regional human services bodies, boards and
committees;
• Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with other jurisdiction's Human
Services offices including state, county and city, and other community agencies and organizations
concerned with addressing human services issues and needs in the community.
• Provide technical and policy information to the public, and meet with public to resolve Human Service
problems within the community and maintain positive relations.
• Communicate community needs to stakeholders, and promote available resources and solutions.
• Ensure that the community and other city departments are aware of resources and providers within the
city, and can make appropriate referrals.
• Collaborate with other city divisions and departments to address changing needs and demographics.
• Participate in local, Snohomish County -wide, and region -wide conversations around human services to
align city and regional priorities.
• Coordinate programs, systems, and activities with local and regional human service providers and with
other jurisdictions. Assist in the development of regional responses to local needs.
• Serve as the city's representative to committees and organizations, communicate and meet City officials
and administrators, public and private organizations, agencies, residents; serve on various committees as
required.
• Seek grant funding on behalf of the City to address human services needs and/or develop greater
capacity to address needs by City staff and/or resources.
• Ensure effective customer service, and efficient productivity,
• Remain current with relevant advancements related to field.
• Maintain regular, reliable, and punctual attendance, work evening and/or weekend hours as assigned,
and travel as required.
Required Knowledge of:
• Principles and practices of planning, development, and execution of municipal human services programs
• Local and regional human services issues
• Snohomish County human service providers/systems.
• Community demographics.
• Policies and objectives of assigned programs and activities.
• Laws, rules and regulations related to assigned activities.
• Budget preparation practices.
• Grant application processes, grant availabilities and eligibility.
Required Skill in:
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience, and courtesy, including diverse community groups
• Effective, professional, and positive interactions with difficult individuals.
• Meet schedules and deadlines.
• Report preparation and distribution skills.
• Budget development and control skills.
• Research and analytical skills.
• Decision -making skills.
• Conflict resolution and problem -solving skills.
• Leadership skills.
• Detail -oriented organizational skills.
• Ability to:
o Compose, proofread, and edit correspondence, ensuring correct grammar, spelling, punctuation
and vocabulary.
o Work independently.
o Negotiate viable solutions under a variety of circumstances.
o Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
Human Services Program Manager
Last Reviewed: 06/08/2021
Last Revised: 01/08/2020
Packet Pg. 187
7.10.a
3 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Human Services Program Manager
o Generate complex reports.
o Oral communication and public presentation skills.
• Working with diverse community groups.
• Grant application writing, researching grant opportunities.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's degree in Public Administration, one of the social sciences or other related field directly related to
Human Services or Social Work. Four (4) years of increasingly responsible experience in program
management with at least two (2) of those years specifically in the management of Human Services programs
and/or services. Experience in public sector program management is preferred. An equivalent combination of
education, training and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential
functions of the position will be considered.
Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Valid Driver's license required at time of hire. State of Washington Driver's License required within 30 days of
hire.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment
• Constant interruptions
• Travel to conduct work may be necessary at times, mostly locally
• Some evening and weekend hours may be required for meetings
Physical Abilities
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to
accomplish tasks.
Hazards:
• Contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers.
• Prolonged exposure to glare from computer monitors.
• Exposure to heavy dust in some work areas
• Occasional exposure to toxic or caustic chemicals, i.e. copier toner
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Human Services Program Manager
Last Reviewed: 06/08/2021
Last Revised: 01/08/2020
Packet Pg. 188
7.11
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of Professional Services Agreement with The Blueline Group to provide Capital Projects
Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On April 12, 2022 this item was presented to the Parks and Public Works Committee and the committee
placed the item on the April 19, 2022 consent agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Professional Services Agreement.
Narrative
The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in December 2021 to hire a consultant to support City
staff with construction management, engineering and inspection services for various City funded capital
projects that are scheduled to begin construction in 2022 and 2023. The City received statements of
qualifications from seven (7) engineering firms and the selection committee chose The Blueline Group to
provide services during construction based on their qualifications, experience and approach.
The City has negotiated a consultant fee of $266,600. This agreement will allow Blueline to provide
services for the 2022 Annual Overlay Project, Seaview Park Storm Infiltration Project, and 2022 Annual
Utility Replacement Project for which there is not enough staff to be able to inspect and/or administer
these contracts. If services are required in 2023 a separate scope and fee will be drafted in 2023. This
contract will be funded as applicable by each respective project's utility or transportation fund.
Attachments:
2022 Blueline - PSA and CM scope
Packet Pg. 189
7.11.a
CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON
121 5T" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR
Website: www.edmondswa.gov
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into between the City of
Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and The Blueline Group, hereinafter referred to
as the "Consultant."
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide Capital Project Construction Management, Engineering and
Inspection Services; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and experience, and desires to provide
such services to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by
and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary
to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Work that is
marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on
a time and expense basis as set forth in Exhibit A; provided, in no event shall the payment for
work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX
THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($266,600.00).
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly during the
progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that
has not been submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late
vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle.
Packet Pg. 190
7.11.a
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final
payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data,
reports, and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation
for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of
the Consultant, provided, however, that:
A. All final reports, presentations, documentation and testimony prepared by
the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by
the City and shall at that date become the property of the City.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review
and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this
Agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and
release under Chapter 42.56 RCW.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the
event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination,
shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be prepared
at no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this
Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals.
5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any
and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts,
errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction
determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for
damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from
the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and
volunteers, the Consultant's liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall be
only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including
RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The
Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own
employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the
Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Packet Pg. 191
7.11.a
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and
keep in force during the term of this Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance
with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to
Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not
less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property
damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million
dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million
dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by
the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant
shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement.
The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies
at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State
of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to
the City.
The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this
Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties
be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the
United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other
protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent
contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative
of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any
purpose. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees,
representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement.
9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's
status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must
meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not
perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for
any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written
notification to the City and the City's prior written consent.
Packet Pg. 192
7.11.a
10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may
terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other parry written notice of such
termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination.
11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document,
its Appendices 1 & 2, and the Scope of Work and fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A. These
writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing
executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any
provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control.
12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage the Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and the Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be
liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation
is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are
encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision
to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph
shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services
rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this
Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13. Standard of Care. The Consultant represents that the Consultant has the
necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. The
Consultant and any persons employed by the Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the
work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the schedules
herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of
the type described in the Scope of Work.
14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he/she/they
has/have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she/they
has/have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without
liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover,
the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations
for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of
individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of
services. Because this Agreement is subject to federal nondiscrimination laws, the Consultant
Packet Pg. 193
7.11.a
agrees that the provisions of Appendices 1 & 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, apply to this Agreement.
The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes
which may be due on account of this Agreement.
18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address:
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
The Blueline Group
25 Central Way, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in the
U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
DATED THIS day of
2022.
CITY OF EDMONDS THE BLUELINE GROUP
BY:
Mike Nelson, Mayor
ITS:
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Packet Pg. 194
7.11.a
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of 2022, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared , to me known to be the person who executed
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said person, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated
that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Packet Pg. 195
7.11.a
APPENDIX 1 CONTRACT
(Appendix A of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances)
During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors
in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Consultant/Contractor") agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant/Contractor shall comply with the acts and regulations
relative to nondiscrimination in federally -assisted programs of the United States Department of
Transportation (USDOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 (49 CFR 21), as they may be
amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated
by reference and made a part of this Agreement.
Nondiscrimination: The Consultant/Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the
Agreement, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability,
income -level, or LEP in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of
materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant/Contractor shall not participate directly or
indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment
practices when the Agreement covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49
CFR 21.
Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all
solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the Consultant/ Contractor for
work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials, or leases of equipment,
each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant/Contractor of the
Consultant's/Contractor's obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to
nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income -level, or
LEP.
Information and Reports: The Consultant/Contractor shall provide all information and reports
required by the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its
books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the
City or the appropriate state or federal agency to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant/Contractor is in
the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the
Consultant/Contractor shall so certify to the City, or state or federal agency, as appropriate, and shall
set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's/Contractor's noncompliance with the
nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City shall impose such contract sanctions as it or
the appropriate state or federal agency may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
• Withholding of payments to the Consultant/Contractor under the Agreement until the
Consultant/Contractor complies; and/or
• Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement, in whole or in part.
Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant/Contractor shall include the provisions of the above
paragraphs one (1) through five (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The
Consultant/Contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the
City or appropriate state or federal agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions,
including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant/Contractor becomes involved
in, or is threatened with, litigation by a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the
Consultant/ Contractor may request that the City enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the
City; or may request that the appropriate state agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests
of the State of Washington. In addition, the Consultant/Contractor may request the appropriate federal
agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
Packet Pg. 196
7.11.a
APPENDIX 2 CONTRACT
(Appendix E of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances)
During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors
in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Consultant/Contractor") agrees to comply with the
following non-discrimination statutes and authorities, including but not limited to:
Pertinent Non -Discrimination Authorities:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21.
• The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. §
4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because
of Federal or Federal -aid programs and proejcts);
• Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of
sex);
• Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27;
• The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age);
• Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. § 471, Section 47123), as amended,
(prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex);
• The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and
applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or
activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal -aid recipients, sub -recipients and
contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);
• Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilties Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of
disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public
accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by
Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38;
• The Federal Aviation Administration's Non -Discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex);
• Executive Order 12898 , Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations
and Low -Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by
discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health
or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations;
• Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Person with Limited English Profcency,
and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of
limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable
steps to ensure the LEP person have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to
74100);
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating
because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq).
Packet Pg. 197
7.11.a
EXHIBIT A — SCOPE & FEE ESTIMATE
Project Name: 2022 Edmonds Construction Services Job #: 21-407
Effective Date: April 6, 2022
Project Description
The Blueline Group, LLC ("Blueline") will provide construction administration and inspection services
during the 2022 construction season. The following projects ("Projects") are anticipated to be included
as part of this scope:
• 2022 Annual Overlay Project
• Seaview Park Storm Project
• 2022 Annual Utility Replacement Project
Task Summary
Task 001
Management Reserve
Task 002
2022 Annual Overlay Project
Task 003
Seaview Park Storm Project
Task 004
2022 Annual Utility Replacement Project
Project Schedule
Our Team shall begin work immediately upon receipt of Notice to Proceed, this is estimated for April
2022.
Scope of Work
Blueline's scope of work for the projects is outlined on the following pages. Each task shall be comprised
of sub tasks A, B and/or C as outlined in the following pages. Any additional projects added to this scope
of work will be assigned a new sequential number and have any combination of sub tasks A, B and/or C
included.
1
Packet Pg. 198
EXHIBIT A — SCOPE & FEE ESTIMATE
7.11.a
Tasks 001 - 004
Task 001 Management Reserve
This task provides for unanticipated construction services deemed to be necessary during the course of
the projects. The Management Reserve task shall only be used after obtaining written authorization
from the City.
Task 002 2022 Annual Overlay Project
Blueline will provide construction administration and full-time inspection services under subtasks B and
C for the 2022 Annual Overlay Project. Inspections will be at various locations throughout the City.
Task 003 Seaview Park Storm Project
Blueline will provide full-time construction inspection services under subtask C for the Seaview Park
Storm Project.
Task 004 2022 Annual Utility Replacement Project
Blueline will provide part-time construction inspection services under subtask C for the 2022 Annual
Utility Replacement Project. This includes water, sewer and storm replacement inspections at various
locations throughout the City as described below:
• 88th Ave W from 192n1 St SW to 185th PI SW
• 761h Ave W from 242nd St SW to 2381h PI SW
• 4th Ave S alley between Main St and Bell St
• 182nd PI SE from 88th Ave W to dead end
• 88th Ave W at 185th PI SW
Subtask A Project Management
(Not included in Tasks 002, 003, & 004)
This task is for general coordination and meetings on the projects, including:
• Management of all tasks and staff for construction inspection services.
• Communication with the City of Edmonds regarding the construction.
• Budget tracking and providing weekly updates to the City.
• Preparation of consultant monthly invoices for work performed during the previous month,
including any pertinent backup materials.
Deliverables: Weekly budgeting spreadsheet.
2
Packet Pg. 199
7.11.a
EXHIBIT A — SCOPE & FEE ESTIMATE
Subtask B Construction Administration
(Not included in Tasks 003, & 004)
Blueline will provide construction administration services for the projects during the construction
period. Services under this task are anticipated to include any of the following items as budget allows as
requested by each City Project Manager:
• Review plans and specifications and visit the site prior to the preconstruction meeting.
• Attend preconstruction meeting and send out minutes.
• Review and approve Contractor progress schedules.
• Prepare and review contract pay estimates.
• Prepare force account and change orders, as needed.
• Prepare and submit weekly reports (Weekly Statement of Working Days and Project Progress
Chart).
• Log affidavits, intents, and certified payroll.
• Provide project filing.
• Provide force account and RFI log.
• Coordinate changes to drawings or specifications as necessary to respond to filed conditions (as
needed — coordinating with City Project Manager).
• Monitor construction to determine contractor compliance and prepare associated
documentation.
• General consultation and coordination on an as needed basis to address construction questions.
• Assist with preparing punch lists and final inspection.
• Prepare recommendation of project acceptance.
• Attend and conduct construction meetings as required. Provide meeting minutes to attendees.
• Additional construction inspection services and project management, as needed.
Deliverables: Monthly Pay Estimates, Change Orders, Force Account, meeting minutes and all
other construction documentation.
Assumptions: The City or Design Engineering Firm will prepare as built drawings based on the
as built redlines.
The City will review material submittals and maintain a submittal log.
Projects include 2022 Annual Overlay Project (10 weeks).
3
Packet Pg. 200
7.11.a
EXHIBIT A — SCOPE & FEE ESTIMATE
Subtask C Construction Inspection
(Included in all tasks)
Blueline will provide construction inspection services for the projects during the construction period
Services under this task are anticipated to include:
• Review plans/specifications and visit the site.
• Review materials delivered to the site to review compliance with City approved submittals.
• Provide inspection of all aspects of the construction activity to review Contractor compliance
with the contract plans and specifications.
• Coordinate compaction and materials testing with the testing agency selected by the City under
a separate contract.
• Coordinate all testing with the City and Contractor for the projects.
• Coordinate final connections with the City and Contractor for water main projects.
• Record and report the progress of the construction operations to the City throughout the
duration of the contract.
• Furnish the City with verification of all quantities of materials.
• Provide final project inspection including punch lists.
• Provide as -built redlines to supplement the Contractor's redlines.
• Monitor the Contractor's traffic control operations to review compliance with City approved
traffic control plan.
• Be responsive to requests from citizens and businesses.
Deliverables: Inspector's Daily Report, records of Force Account work, weekly tabulation of
quantities placed (including truck tickets), construction progress photos.
Assumptions: The City or Design Engineering Firm will prepare as built drawings based on the
as built redlines.
The Contractor will provide construction staking for the projects.
The City will provide purity testing (with coordination provided by Inspector).
The City will review materials submittal and maintain a submittal log.
Projects include 2022 Annual Utility Replacement Project (8 weeks), Seaview
Park Storm Project (9 weeks), and 2022 Annual Overlay Project (10 weeks).
4
Packet Pg. 201
7.11.a
EXHIBIT A — SCOPE & FEE ESTIMATE
General Assumptions and Notes
• Scope and fees outlined above are based on the Project Understanding included with this
proposal as well as the following information (any changes to these documents may result in
changes to the fees):
o Correspondence prior to the effective date of this Agreement.
• The following items are not anticipated to be necessary and are not included in this proposal:
o Structural, Environmental, Geotechnical, Materials Testing or Transportation Engineering
services.
o Gas main relocation coordination.
o Other dry utility relocation coordination.
o Staking services.
• Obtaining any offsite easements or right -of -entry including permanent easements (if required)
will be the responsibility of the Client.
• Blueline will not pay any Agency fees on behalf of the Client. This includes any fees associated
with permits and easements.
• The fees stated above do not include reimbursable expenses such as large format copies (larger
than legal size), mileage, and plots. These will appear under a separate task called EXPENSES.
• Time and expense items are based on Blueline's current hourly rates.
• These fees stated above are valid if accepted within 30 days of the date of the proposal.
• The City and Blueline will negotiate an adjustment to the fee schedule for tasks not started
within a year of contract execution.
• Project stops/starts and significant changes to the Project Schedule may result in changes to the
fees provided above and a separate fee proposal will be provided.
• If the Client provides written requests for Blueline's assistance in complying with any public
records request, including without limitation providing copies of documents and communications,
Client will pay Blueline's hourly fees and costs incurred in providing such assistance at then -
current rates. Such fees and costs will be billed under Task 001.
5
Packet Pg. 202
2022 Edmonds Construction Services
Job Number: 21-407 Prepared By: Grace Garwin, EIT
Date: 4/6/2022 Checked By: Rob Dahn, PE
Senior Project Engineer Construction
Manager Inspector
$226/hr $182/hr $143/hr Total
Task # Base Tasks Total Fee Fee Type
Hours Hours Hours Hours
001 Management Reserve
2022 Annual Overlay Project
002B Construction Administration
002C Construction Inspection
Seaview Park Storm Project
003C Construction Inspection
2022 Annual Utility Replacement Project
004C Construction Inspection
Expenses
26
0
H
0
Total Hours 42
Blueline Personnel $9,492
7
L.
0
$30,000
Not to Exceed
r0
L
c
0
82
0
108
$20,800
Not to Exceed
L-
0
0
520
520
$74,360
Not to Exceed
m
m
z
3
13
476
497
$72,240
Not to Exceed
Q
U)
a
a�
Q.
0
12
428
448
$65,200
Not to Exceed
U
U
$4,000
R
107
1424
1573
Q
$19,474 $203,632 $266,600 a
m
c
m
N
N
O
N
C
N
E
t
V
Q
Packet Pg. 203
7.11.a
001 Management Reserve Total Cost Total
Item # Description
1 Unassigned Services Reserve $30,000
Total Fee $30,000
$30,000
Senior Project
Construction
002B
Construction Administration
Engineer
Total Hours
Manager
Inspector
Item #
Description
$226/hr
$182/hr
$143/hr
Hours
Hours
Hours
1
Preconstruction Meeting (incl. prep)
6
6
12
2
Weekly Admin Tasks (10wks @ 1hr/wk)
10
10
20
3
Weekly Progress Meeting & Minutes
10
30
40
4
Pay Estimates/Change Orders (3mos @ 12hr/mo)
36
36
Total Hours
26
82
0
108
Total Fee
$5,876
$14,924
$0
$20,800
Senior Project
Construction
002C
Construction Inspection
Engineer
Total Hours
Manager
Inspector
Item #
Description
$226/hr
$182/hr
$143/hr
Hours
Hours
Hours
1
Preconstruction Meeting (incl. prep)
40
40
2
Full Time Inspections (10wks @ 40hr/wk)
400
400
3
Final Inspections & Punchlist
40
40
4
Project Close Out
40
40
Total Hours
0
0
520
520
Total Fee
$0
$0
$74,360
$74,360
Q
Packet Pg. 204
Senior Project
Construction
7.11.a
003C
Construction Inspection
Engineer
Total Hours
Manager
Inspector
Item #
Description
$226/hr
$182/hr
$143/hr
Hours
Hours
Hours
L
1
Preconstruction Meeting (incl. prep)
4
4
40
48
`
2
Full Time Inspections (9wks @ 40hr/wk)
360
360
3
Final Inspections & Punchlist
36
36
4
Project Close Out
40
40
5
General Coordination
4
9
13
Total Hours
8
13
476
497
0
Total Fee
$1,808
$2,366
$68,068
$72,240 3
L
Senior Project
Construction
o
004C
Construction Inspection
Engineer
Total Hours
U
Manager
Inspector
Item #
Description
$226/hr
$182/hr
$143/hr
o
Hours
Hours
Hours
1
Preconstruction Meeting (incl. prep)
4
4
40
48
2
Part Time Inspections (8wks @ 40hr/wk)
320
320
m
3
Final Inspections & Punchlist
32
32
3
4
City Staff Support
4
8
36
48
Q
cn
Total Hours
8
12
428
448
a
Total Fee
$1,808
$2,184
$61,204
$65,200 a
Packet Pg. 205
7.12
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
February 2022 Monthly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
February 2022 Monthly Financial Report
Attachments:
February 2022 Monthly Financial Report
Packet Pg. 206
I 7.12.a I
OF
EDP
� d
lac. 1SOV
CITY OF EDMONDS
MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
FEBRUARY 2022
Packet Pg. 207 1
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
I 7.12.a I
Agency/
Investment
Issuer
Type
FFCB
Bonds
Energy Northwest
Bonds
Energy Northwest
Bonds
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Bonds
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
Seattle WA Muni
Bonds
FHLB
Bonds
First Financial - ECA
CD
Kent WA
Bonds
Spokane County WA
Bonds
First Financial - Waterfront Center
CD
TOTAL SECURITIES
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
As of February 28, 2022
Years
Purchase to Par
Price
Issuer Diversification Seattle
Kent WA,
2%
WA
Muni,
13%
1,998,548
1,466,077
260,748
948,084
1,517,955
576,332
2,224,500
1,996,590
2,803,516
286,648
207,260
1,575,000
15,861,256
Mason& --_ First
Kits apCnty Financial
WA, 6% CD, 29%
Grant Cnty Spokane
WA, 13% -41 County
FHLB, WA, 1%
FFCB, 13%
13% Energy
Northwest,
10%
0.29
0.34
0.34
0.76
0.84
0.84
0.93
1.60
1.71
1.76
2.76
5.68
1.49
Value
2,000,000
1,345,000
250,000
855,000
1,500,000
520,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,803,516
250,000
200,000
1,575,000
15,298,516
14, 921, 257
42,527,765
Market
Value
2,008,088
1,364,933
251,888
881,633
1,504,545
537,919
2,076,060
1,969,112
2,803,516
266,795
201,206
1,575,000
15,440,695
14, 921, 257
42,527,765
$ 72,747,539 $ 72,889,717
Maturity
Date
06/14/22
07/01 /22
07/01 /22
12/01 /22
01 /01 /23
01 /01 /23
02/01 /23
10/05/23
11 /15/23
12/01 /23
12/01 /24
11 /01 /27
Demand
Demand
Checking, Cash and Investment Balances
$2.7 , 4% (in $ Millions)
--M_
CD's, $4.4,� Bonds,
6% $10.9, 14%
State LGIP,
$14.9, 20%
County
LGIP,
$42.5 , 56%
Coupon
Rate
1.88%
5.00%
2.95%
5.00%
1.54%
5.00%
5.00%
0.22%
2.08%
5.00%
2.10%
0.25%
0.11%
1.04%
O
N
R
U
C
O
C
LL
21
L
r�
C
O
a
N
N
O
N
to
3
L
LL
1
Packet Pg. 208 1
1 7.12.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,236,875
$1,200, 000
$1,000,000 $882556 947 931 $950,684
$800,000 $635,781
$600,000
$400,000
$226,451
$200,000
$-
2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022
2
Packet Pg. 209
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
712a
General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months)
General Fund Revenue General Fund Expenses
10,000, 000
9,000,000
8,000,000 --•�
7,000, 000
6,000,000 •
5,000,000 •
4,000,000 •
3,000,000
2,000,000 -+
1,00%000
- - T
March June September December March
June September December
General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021)
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
12,000, 000
10,000, 000
8,000, 000
6,000,000
4,000, 000
2,000,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2,000,000
1,800,000
1,600,000
1,400, 000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
Sales Tax
General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD)
537.762
Property Tax EMS Tax
it-
Other Taxes
3
I Packet Pg. 210
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2022
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January
$ 2,484,467 $
2,484,467 $ 2,291,020 -7.79%
February
4,913,525
2,429,058 4,710,176 -4.14%
March
7,374,972
2,461,446
April
10,508,115
3,133,143
May
19,342,926
8,834,811
June
21,919,233
2,576,308
July
24,447,221
2,527,987
August
27,064,689
2,617,469
September
29,443,427
2,378,738
October
33,489,206
4,045,780
November
42,060,773
8,571,567
December
44,640,708
2,579,935
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2022
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 381,097 $
381,097
$ 377,895 -0.84%
February
611,562
230,465
620,392 1.44%
March
952,142
340,580
April
1,227,434
275,291
May
1,586,772
359,339
June
1,961,879
375,106
July
2,368,248
406,370
August
2,810,074
441,826
September
3,256,638
446,564
October
3,660,486
403,848
November
4,056,561
396,075
December
4,400,000
343,439
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
4
Packet Pg. 211
SALES TAX SUMMARY
1 7.12.a I
Construction Trade,
$268,962
Accommodation, $6,4491
Clothing and
Accessories,
Conuua&4A8&'
$43,825
Wholesale Trade,
$62,848
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: February 2022
Year -to -Date
Total $1,853,000
Business Services,
Automotive Repair, $223,849
$39,684 Amusement
Health & Personal & Recreation,
Care, $53,071 $12,529 Gasoline, $5,488
IL m
Misc Retail, $362,284
i
Others, $30,497
Retail Food Stores,
$60,440
Retail Automotive,
� $403,279
Manufacturing, $22,816
Eating & Drinking,
$182,969
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
12,000,000
$10,302,518
10,000, 000
$7,395,114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046
8,000,000 6,905,122
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000, 000 $1,853,000
0
2016 2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022
F
0
CL
c
0
c
ii
z
c
0
a
N
N
0
N
M
L
d
5
Packet Pg. 212 1
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2022
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 763,651
$ 763,651
$ 857,872 12.34%
February
1,704,609
940,958
1,853,000 8.71%
March
2,420,254
715,646
April
3,074,639
654,384
May
3,893,081
818,442
June
4,672,507
779,426
July
5,523,403
850,896
August
6,439,084
915,680
September
7,293,649
854,565
October
8,203,996
910,347
November
9,139,425
935,429
December
10,000,000
860,575
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2022
Gas Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 79,399
$ 79,399
$ 96,596
21.66%
February
164,205
84,806
96,596
-41.17%
March
246,125
81,920
April
313,860
67,734
May
367,416
53,556
June
402,173
34,757
July
429,975
27,802
August
452,332
22,357
September
472,668
20,335
October
496,035
23,367
November
534,998
38,963
December
595,000
60,002
Gas Utility Tax
700,000
600,000
500,000 -
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
6
Packet Pg. 213
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2022
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
53,352 $
53,352 $ 43,844-17.82%
February
96,981
43,629 66,255-31.68%
March
143,255
46,275
April
192,397
49,142
May
232,481
40,084
June
277,770
45,288
July
321,046
43,277
August
362,710
41,663
September
400,099
37,389
October
445,363
45,264
November
482,039
36,676
December
523,000
40,961
Electric Utility Tax
Telephone Utility Tax
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2022
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
148,905 $
148,905 $ 183,023 22.91%
February
312,488
163,583 377,116 20.68%
March
449,608
137,121
April
602,286
152,678
May
723,393
121,107
June
824,492
101,099
July
920,639
96,147
August
1,015,921
95,282
September
1,108,535
92,614
October
1,199,070
90,535
November
1,299,972
100,902
December
1,410,000
110,028
Electric Utility Tax
1,zsuu,uuu
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
CL
O
2
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
04
O
N
M
7
L
d
Packet Pg. 214
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2022
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 809,979
$ 809,979
$ 827,704 2.19%
February
1,383,405
573,426
1,383,308 -0.01%
March
2,213,219
829,814
April
2,744,029
530,810
May
3,542,697
798,668
June
4,167,857
625,160
July
5,138,308
970,451
August
5,986,736
848,427
September
7,133,311
1,146,575
October
7,954,825
821,514
November
8,891,706
936,881
December
9,464,783
573,077
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2022
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 426,464
$ 426,464
$ 417,730 -2.05%
February
1,352,938
926,475
1,322,856 -2.22%
March
1,779,789
426,851
April
2,159,443
379,654
May
2,586,880
427,437
June
2,966,444
379,564
July
3,385,868
419,425
August
4,311,526
925,657
September
4,738,766
427,240
October
5,118,192
379,426
November
5,545,860
427,668
December
5,911,497
365,637
Storm Water Sales
6,000,000
5,500,000
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget - Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
!Z
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
tV
M
7
L
d
Packet Pg. 215
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2022
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 863,521
$ 863,521
$ 877,046 1.57%
February
1,571,494
707,973
1,604,010 2.07%
March
2,435,565
864,071
April
3,143,499
707,934
May
4,009,811
866,312
June
4,719,932
710,121
July
5,593,564
873,631
August
6,307,925
714,362
September
7,215,145
907,220
October
7,936,868
721,723
November
8,819,637
882,769
December
9,528,089
708,452
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
N
R
U
C
t4
C
LL
t
Y
O
2
N
N
O
N
fC
3
L
LL
9
Packet Pg. 216
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2022
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
5,037,513 $
5,037,513 $ 4,601,625 -8.65%
February
8,698,441
3,660,928 8,134,057 -6.49%
March
12,684,987
3,986,545
April
16,175,488
3,490,501
May
19,877,603
3,702,115
June
24,471,682
4,594,079
July
28,365,767
3,894,085
August
32,050,577
3,684,810
September
35,945,282
3,894,705
October
40,211,986
4,266,704
November
44,691,316
4,479,330
December
49,371,535
4,680,219
Non -Departmental
General Fund
45,000,000
40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
5,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"—Current Year Budget �Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2022
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
2,235,029 $
2,235,029 $ 2,099,939 -6.04%
February
3,157,194
922,165 2,938,380 -6.93%
March
4,332,218
1,175,025
April
5,048,922
716,703
May
5,936,975
888,054
June
7,580,854
1,643,878
July
8,529,581
948,727
August
9,310,253
780,673
September
10,214,848
904,595
October
11,354,650
1,139,802
November
12,623,189
1,268,539
December
13,877,484
1,254,295
Non -Departmental
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"— Current Year Budget 0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
O
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
2
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
10
Packet Pg. 217
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2022
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
33,985 $
33,985 $ 23,687-30.30%
February
71,308
37,323 43,670-38.76%
March
112,128
40,821
April
150,174
38,046
May
199,408
49,234
June
253,207
53,799
July
291,886
38,679
August
345,215
53,328
September
382,380
37,165
October
414,981
32,601
November
455,321
40,340
December
497,900
42,579
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2022
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 36,522
$ 36,522
$ 28,255
-22.63%
February
74,639
38,117
59,226
-20.65%
March
111,240
36,600
April
148,486
37,247
May
185,158
36,671
June
221,111
35,953
July
257,901
36,789
August
295,030
37,129
September
331,738
36,709
October
367,805
36,067
November
405,747
37,941
December
443,913
38,166
Office of Mayor
500,000
450,000
400,000
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-CurrentYeaz Budget --*-PriorYeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
11
Packet Pg. 218
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2022
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 77,402
$ 77,402
$ 59,932
-22.57%
February
141,639
64,236
135,524
-4.32%
March
202,815
61,176
April
266,756
63,941
May
331,195
64,439
June
405,872
74,678
July
464,145
58,273
August
524,126
59,981
September
590,408
66,282
October
654,662
64,254
November
726,800
72,138
December
824,831
98,031
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2022
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 104,268
$ 104,268
$ 91,643
-12.11%
February
213,906
109,638
187,919
-12.15%
March
322,490
108,584
April
431,592
109,102
May
548,505
116,913
June
654,584
106,079
July
763,667
109,084
August
884,110
120,443
September
995,910
111,800
October
1,110,987
115,077
November
1,227,059
116,072
December
1,368,755
141,696
Municipal Court
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
12
Packet Pg. 219
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2022
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
49,857 $
49,857 $ 33,127-33.56%
February
103,113
53,256 72,230-29.95%
March
155,568
52,455
April
205,451
49,882
May
260,752
55,301
June
315,986
55,234
July
373,132
57,147
August
434,777
61,645
September
492,000
57,223
October
552,240
60,239
November
622,590
70,351
December
719,388
96,798
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
FY
C
M
C
ILL
t
r
C
O
N
04
O
N
M
7
L
d
ILL
13
Packet Pg. 220
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2022
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
176,962 $
176,962 $ 216,858 22.55%
February
334,966
158,004 287,295-14.23%
March
484,397
149,431
April
566,805
82,408
May
674,037
107,232
June
784,541
110,504
July
877,847
93,306
August
989,174
111,327
September
1,106,217
117,044
October
1,245,373
139,155
November
1,341,722
96,350
December
1,539,022
197,300
Administrative Services
Technology Rental Fund
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Year Budget -d Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services
2022
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 225,174
$ 225,174
$ 217,022 -3.62%
February
377,256
152,082
380,532 0.87%
March
531,363
154,106
April
687,851
156,488
May
845,341
157,490
June
1,057,978
212,637
July
1,239,765
181,786
August
1,394,692
154,927
September
1,554,018
159,326
October
1,720,684
166,666
November
1,876,703
156,018
December
2,034,511
157,808
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
M
a
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
14
Packet Pg. 221
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2022
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
80,982 $
80,982 $ 77,656 -4.11%
February
161,963
80,982 155,234 -4.16%
March
242,945
80,982
April
323,927
80,982
May
404,908
80,982
June
485,890
80,982
July
566,871
80,982
August
647,853
80,982
September
728,835
80,982
October
809,816
80,982
November
890,798
80,982
December
971,780
80,982
Police
City Attorney
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--P-- Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2022
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
1,045,238 $
1,045,238 $ 973,358 -6.88%
February
2,105,968
1,060,730 1,945,020 -7.64%
March
3,177,596
1,071,629
April
4,236,492
1,058,896
May
5,296,298
1,059,805
June
6,428,932
1,132,634
July
7,551,012
1,122,080
August
8,579,704
1,028,692
September
9,657,485
1,077,782
October
10,845,669
1,188,184
November
12,168,634
1,322,964
December
13,375,470
1,206,836
Police
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--"- Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
sZ
O
2
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
15
Packet Pg. 222
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2022
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
272,173 $
272,173 $ 309,139 13.58%
February
567,186
295,012 661,303 16.59%
March
860,247
293,062
April
1,174,618
314,370
May
1,488,050
313,432
June
1,792,716
304,666
July
2,114,310
321,593
August
2,423,605
309,295
September
2,733,462
309,857
October
3,039,102
305,640
November
3,402,002
362,901
December
3,791,859
389,857
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,00001
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2022
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
355,002 $
355,002 $ 319,222-10.08%
February
741,625
386,623 651,988-12.09%
March
1,126,525
384,900
April
1,522,015
395,490
May
1,924,415
402,401
June
2,349,540
425,125
July
2,810,806
461,266
August
3,318,677
507,872
September
3,838,377
519,700
October
4,255,079
416,701
November
4,650,239
395,160
December
5,081,735
431,496
Parks & Recreation
5,500,000
4,000,000
1,500,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
16
Packet Pg. 223
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2022
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
49,466 $
49,466 $ 22,716-54.08%
February
100,066
50,600 46,637-53.39%
March
150,167
50,100
April
201,867
51,701
May
252,421
50,554
June
303,852
51,431
July
355,684
51,832
August
405,471
49,786
September
455,172
49,701
October
504,185
49,013
November
567,424
63,239
December
614,113
46,689
Facilities Maintenance
Public Works Administration
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2022
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
147,178 $
147,178 $ 109,202-25.80%
February
306,257
159,079 369,398 20.62%
March
485,440
179,182
April
646,968
161,528
May
809,892
162,925
June
942,838
132,946
July
1,105,857
163,019
August
1,298,546
192,690
September
1,524,621
226,074
October
1,782,450
257,829
November
1,988,047
205,597
December
2,298,775
310,728
Facilities Maintenance
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
sZ
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
N
tV
O
N
M
7
L
d
17
Packet Pg. 224
1 7.12.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2022
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD Variance
Actuals
January
$ 225,595 $
225,595
$ 226,829 0.55%
February
452,988
227,392
457,182 0.93%
March
684,071
231,083
April
917,956
233,885
May
1,175,026
257,070
June
1,412,521
237,495
July
1,660,688
248,167
August
1,900,016
239,329
September
2,131,816
231,799
October
2,366,570
234,755
November
2,602,612
236,042
December
2,845,336
242,724
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
CL
O
C
M
C
M
21
t
r
C
O
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
d
ii
18
Packet Pg. 225
1 7.12.a I
Page 1 of 1
C TTY O F IDMO NDS
REVINUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Received
001
GENERAL FUND 1
$ 44,640,708
$ 5,089,278
$ 4,710,176
$ 39,930,532
110
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
225,000
-
-
225,000
00
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
-
-
12,371
(12,371)
04
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
200,000
-
-
200,000
04
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
167,210
502
528
166,682
00 .-.
Ill
STREET FUND
1,751,930
227,570
220,123
1,531,807
130 O
0.
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
13,684,871
483,438
391,143
13,293,728
30 4)
117
MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND
216,701
4,749
67,722
148,979
31° �p
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
-
137
-
-
04 v
C
M
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
84,410
7,389
14,104
70,306
170 r-
IL
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,540
5,080
7,790
18,750
290
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,550
93
100
1,450
64 r
C
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
29,590
2,846
5,195
24,395
180 0
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
2,271,020
479,346
338,827
1,932,193
150 N
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
2,261,030
477,329
334,358
1,926,672
15° N
127
GIFT S CAT ALOG FUND
82,750
18,231
62,990
19,760
764 �%
M
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
182,430
31,103
40,753
141,677
220 i
136
PARKSTRUST FUND
4,330
1,126
1,182
3,148
270
Li
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
43,520
10,675
12,091
31,429
280
r-
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,290
70
108
10,182
14 O
0.
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
79,349
34,450
34,985
44,364
440 4)
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSINGFUND
65,000
14,207
16,010
48,990
250 i0
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
4,856,549
-
-
4,856,549
04
143
TREE FUND
215,330
-
143
215,187
04 E
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
611,370
-
-
611,370
00 >,
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
3,822,685
31,155
20,158
3,802,527
s
14
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
120
25,960
(25,960)
04
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
11,018,136
1,556,152
1,654,074
9,364,062
150
422
STORM UTILITY FUND 2
7,877,897
1,847,019
1,567,867
6,310,030
200
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 3
24,820,083
4,419,842
3,393,406
21,426,677
140
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,700
2
2
1,988,698
04
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,925,920
253,410
318,226
1,607,694
170
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,153,570
205,039
196,324
957,246
170
$ 124,318,469
$ 15,200,360 $
13,446,717
$1109871,752
110
Fund 001 revenues are down $(379,102) in 2022; this is due to a "DOC FAC Roofing Grant that was received in January of 2021.
2 2022 Utility Rate Increases are 4.5%for Water, 5%for Sewer, and 9.5%for Storm Drain.
3 Difference is primarily due to WWTP partner billings in January 2021.
19
Packet Pg. 226
1 7.12.a I
Page 1 of 1
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 49,371,535
$ 7,637,016
$ 8,134,057
$ 41,237,478
160
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
260,490
55,277
53,349
207,141
200
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
-
-
5,900
00,
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
980,000
-
980,000
00,
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
200,000
-
200,000
00/
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
-
-
45,800
00 p
iZ
III
STREET FUND
2,254,676
434,795
454,338
1,800,338
200,
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
12,868,796
35,024
69,666
12,799,130
10,
117
MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND
195,380
6,141
2,125
193,255
10 _
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
100,900
7,278
5,703
95,197
to
60/ C
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
-
-
26,880
IL
04
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
(150)
3,150
-50, r
c
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
28,200
-
-
28,200
00 0
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
4,589,688
11,457
144,516
4,445,172
30/ N
N
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
2,483,667
105,293
30,676
2,452,991
10/ N
127
GIFTS CATALOG FUND
78,400
-
2,114
76,286
30, �%
M
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
220,561
28,671
31,341
189,220
140 i
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
50,000
-
-
50,000
00
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND
25,000
-
25,000
00,
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
-
-
11,900
00, 0
0.
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
87,680
4,600
5,885
81,795
70,
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
5,977,492
-
114,190
5,863,302
20/ iC
143
TREE FUND
214,800
-
214,800
00 r
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
611,370
-
611,370
00, C
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
7,614,418
67,133
834,366
6,780,052
110
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
11,475,894
792,707
894,523
10,581,371
80
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
9,681,440
582,617
833,537
8,847,903
90
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
29,512,501
1,213,019
1,545,617
27,966,884
5"
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,710
-
-
1,988,710
04
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
1,942,460
194,816
257,364
1,685,096
130
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,539,022
168,294
287,295
1,251,727
190
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
-
16,682
-
-
00,
S 144,446,560
$ 11,360,819
$ 13,700,513
S 130,746,047
90,
20
Packet Pg. 227
1 7.12.a I
Page 1 of 3
Title
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX
2 EMS PROPERTY TAX
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 4
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
8 GAS UTILITY TAX
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
10 WATERUTILITY TAX
11 SEWER UTILITY TAX
12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
15 PULLTABSTAX
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER
24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
29 ANIMAL LICENSES
30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
31 OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
32 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
33 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
34 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2
35 DOC FAC ROOFING
36 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
37 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX
38 CJ - POPULATION
39 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
40 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
41 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
42 DUI - CITIES
43 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
44 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
45 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
46 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2022 Amended 2/28/2021
Budget Revenues
2/28/2022 Amount
Revenues Remaining %Received
$ 11,127,000
$ 125,743 $
95,781
$ 11,031,219
10r
4,278,000
49,084
37,762
4,240,238
10/
500
1
27
473
501
10,000,000
1,647,058
1,853,000
8,147,000
190/
7,600
904
3,599
4,001
470/
870,000
157,476
178,710
691,290
210/
1,410,000
367,328
377,116
1,032,884
270r
595,000
172,999
96,596
498,404
160/
284,000
59,636
48,316
235,684
170r
953,000
137,637
138,271
814,729
1501
894,600
148,232
160,357
734,244
180/
471,900
120,531
132,287
339,613
280i
792,000
128,053
133,791
658,209
170/
523,000
85,370
66,255
456,745
130r
55,200
23,251
18,591
36,609
340/
350
143
-
350
00/
306,000
75,813
72,345
233,655
240/
32,568,150
3,299,257
3,412,804
29,155,346
10°i
250
100
50
200
20°/
700
-
20
680
30r
40,000
5,764
14,505
25,495
360/
702,700
170,449
179,444
523,256
260/
41,000
6,441
3,060
37,940
70/
100,600
15,635
12,550
88,050
120/
384,000
80,860
84,298
299,702
220/
250,000
41,146
40,738
209,263
160/
63,000
13,845
15,575
47,425
250/
30,000
14,440
30,173
(173)
1010/
650,600
87,212
77,263
573,337
120/
24,000
4,017
6,357
17,643
260i
55,000
7,970
(1,806)
56,806
-30/
20,000
2,151
2,388
17,612
120r
2,361,850
450,028
464,614
1,897,236
200,
9,000
2,671
5,237
3,763
580/
11,100
417
718
10,382
60/
-
3,947
-
-
00/
-
379,270
-
-
00/
273,000
-
-
273,000
00/
210,500
-
-
210,500
00/
13,070
3,379
3,571
9,499
270/
16,740
4,035
-
16,740
00/
45,600
12,061
12,693
32,907
280/
60,000
-
-
60,000
00/
4,500
1,667
1,793
2,707
400/
261,500
68,016
72,230
189,270
280r
343,200
-
-
343,200
00/
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/
550
-
-
550
00/
1,249,760
475,464
96,243
1,153,517
80,
4 2022 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $205,942 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pagespages 5 & 6.
21 1
Packet Pg. 228 1
7.12.a
Page 2 of 3
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2022 Amended 2/28/2021 2/28/2022 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
13 PHOTOCOPIES
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES
17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE)
18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
24 LEGAL SERVICES
25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
26 BOOKING FEES
27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTSFROMSI'ATIONS
31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
33 PLAN CHECKING FEES
34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE
36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES
39 PROGRAM FEES
40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES
42 WINTERMARKET FEES
43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
$ 3,000 $
632 $
1,266
$ 1,734
420r
600
18
32
568
50i
11,000
963
360
10,640
30/
150
-
-
150
00/
300
-
-
300
00/
-
168
-
-
00/
4,000
-
-
4,000
00/
1,000
74
34
966
30/
50
33
21
29
410r
100
-
-
100
00/
25,000
-
-
25,000
00/
600
-
-
600
00/
1,000
57
943
60/
5,000
-
-
5,000
00/
180,000
36,966
46,655
133,345
260/
1,400
-
2,885
(1,485)
2060/
85,000
16,470
23,810
61,190
280/
10,000
-
805
9,195
80/
30,000
-
-
30,000
00/
14,000
-
-
14,000
00/
210,970
51,206
-
210,970
00/
-
-
13
(13)
00/
57,000
14,616
15,373
41,627
270/
1,050
33
26
1,024
20/
38,000
5,730
3,165
34,835
80/
3,000
125
39
2,961
10/
10,000
2,618
5,837
4,163
580r
3,500
763
100
3,400
30/
1,007,500
201,222
238,403
769,097
240i
2,500
520
600
1,900
240/
100
-
-
100
00/
65,600
17,275
20,885
44,715
320/
425,000
142,787
37,202
387,798
90/
4,000
1,209
2,561
1,439
640/
500
-
110
390
220/
3,000
-
740
2,260
250/
14,000
1,485
3,885
10,115
280/
13,000
-
16
12,984
00/
1,011,580
12,135
6,406
1,005,174
10/
1,300
-
-
1,300
00/
5,000
185
-
5,000
00/
-
-
6,080
(6,080)
00/
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/
4,011,558
202,383
196,414
3,815,144
501
7,261,358
709,617
613,778
6,647,580
80,
22
Packet Pg. 229
7.12.a
Page 3 of 3
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2022 Amended 2/28/2021 2/28/2022 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
15 CRIM CONV FEE CT
16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
20 CRIM CONV FEE CN
21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT
23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
NIIS C ELLANEO US :
26 INVESTMENT INTEREST
27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
29 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS
30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
31 LEASES LONG TERM
32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
33 PARKSDONATIONS
34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
40 POLICE JUDGMENTS✓RESTITUTION
41 CASHIERS OVERAGES✓SHORTAGES
42 OTHER MISC REVENUES
43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
45 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
46 NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT
47 US BANK REBATE
TRANSFERS -IN:
48 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$ 2,000 $
514 $
248 $
1,752
120/
230,000
32,192
10,394
219,606
501
18,000
1,699
676
17,324
40/
10,000
2,638
638
9,362
60/
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/
1,500
306
171
1,329
110/
100,000
9,724
3,428
96,572
30/
2,000
-
44
1,956
20/
7,000
1,330
415
6,585
60/
300
16
-
300
00/
100
35
4
96
40/
1,500
308
252
1,248
170i
25,000
2,349
1,032
23,968
40/
2,000
254
268
1,732
130/
700
13
-
700
00/
100
12
-
100
00/
10,000
298
352
9,648
40/
800
-
12
788
20/
1,000
5
52
948
501
200
7
-
200
00/
8,000
545
373
7,627
501
14,000
1,594
536
13,464
40/
3,000
469
49
2,951
20/
10,100
-
-
10,100
00/
150
-
-
150
00/
448,450
54,309
18,945
429,505
4°i
270,390
64,006
63,353
207,037
230/
13,340
1,488
715
12,625
501
10,180
1,418
877
9,303
90/
153,000
(423)
2,973
150,028
20/
2,100
-
-
2,100
00/
205,000
32,293
34,379
170,621
170/
2,500
-
76
2,424
30/
3,500
-
300
3,200
90/
1,500
-
-
1,500
00/
5,000
-
-
5,000
00/
300
-
-
300
00/
3,800
468
324
3,476
90/
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/
200
10
10
190
501
-
2
14
(14)
00/
41,180
1,304
758
40,422
20/
100
8
13
87
130/
100
30
-
100
00/
150
-
-
150
00/
-
-
-
-
00/
8,500
-
-
8,500
00/
724,840
100,603
103,792
621,048
140,
26,300 - - 26,300 00/
26,300 - - 265300 00/
$ 44,640,708 $ 5,089,278 $ 4,710,176 $39,930,532 110/
23
Packet Pg. 230
1 7.12.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
I SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 19,196,413
$ 2,808,687
$ 2,841,391
$ 16,355,022
150
2 OVERTIME
594,080
96,367
201,343
392,737
340
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
294,001
1,951
6,187
287,814
24
4 BENEFITS
6,820,049
1,063,517
1,072,560
5,747,489
164
5 UNIFORMS
119,151
11,822
6,880
112,271
69
6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
70,944
-
11,825
59,119
170
7 SUPPLIES
481,165
59,823
45,215
435,950
94
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
204,019
9,766
15,804
188,216
M
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,274,828
2,556,380
2,653,970
12,620,858
170
10 COMMUNICATIONS
171,235
20,147
14,441
156,794
M
11 TRAVEL
81,155
-
3,217
77,938
44
12 EXCISE TAXES
16,500
2,544
2,993
13,507
180
13 RENTAL/LEASE
2,091,693
255,532
338,100
1,753,593
160
14INSURANCE
375,539
405,121
503,160
(127,621)
1344
15 UTILITIES
529,462
60,817
90,751
438,711
174
16 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
364,850
104,472
144,268
220,582
400
17 MISCELLANEOUS
652,023
130,071
131,953
520,070
200
18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
50,000
50,000
50,000
-
10M
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,385,000
-
-
1,385,000
M
20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
-
-
-
M
21 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
270,180
-
-
270,180
M
22 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
55,170
-
-
55,170
04
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
4,790
-
-
4,790
M
24 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
268,788
-
-
268,788
04
25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
-
-
500
M
49,371,535
7,637,016
8,134,057
41,237,478
16"
LEO FF-MEDIC AL INS. RESERVE (009)
26 BENEFITS
$
-
$
32,702 $
35,907 $
(35,907)
04
27 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
22,575
17,442
235,548
74
28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
-
-
7,000
M
29 MISCELLANEOUS
500
-
-
500
0°
260,490
S
55,277
53,349
207,141
20°
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014)
30 SUPPLIES
$
100
$
$
- $
100
0°
31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
200
09
32 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
5,600
04
5,900
5,900
04
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
115,000
$
$
- $
115,000
09
34 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
665,000
-
665,000
04
35 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
90,000
-
90,000
M
36 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
110,000
-
-
110,000
0°
980,000
-
-
980,000
M
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
200,000
$
- $
- $
200,000
0°
200,000
-
-
200,000
0°
DRUG ENFO RC EMENT FUND (104)
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
45,000
$
$
- $
45,000
0°
39 REPAIR/MAINT
800
800
0°
45,800
$
45,800
0°
O
CL
O
io
C
to
C
IL
s
C
O
z
N
N
O
N
O
7
L
N
LL
24
Packet Pg. 231
1 7.12.a I
Page 2 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
STREETFUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 749,110
$ 124,506
$ 113,792
$ 635,318
154
2 OVERTIME
38,400
12,118
5,910
32,490
154
3 BENEFITS
347,919
61,385
57,737
290,182
170
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,602
1,345
4,655
22°
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
4,155
10,551
252,449
44
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
-
587
19,413
30
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23,210
3,525
4,389
18,821
190
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
699
672
3,828
15°
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
04
10 RENTAL/LEASE
290,150
40,935
48,091
242,059
17
11 INSURANCE
123,007
148,533
184,111
(61,104)
15W
12 UTILITIES
273,730
28,616
23,446
250,284
99
13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
72,000
-
2,318
69,682
M
14 MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
6,721
1,389
6,611
174
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
30,000
-
-
30,000
W
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,270
-
-
4,270
W
17 INTEREST
380
-
380
04
$
2,254,676
$
434,795
S
454,338
$ 1,800,338
2W
COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112)
18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
3,159,560
$
35,024
$
42,490
$ 3,117,070
11
19 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE
1,508,270
-
-
1,508,270
04
20 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
108,975
-
-
108,975
W
21 LAND
-
-
27,176
(27,176)
04
22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
8,018,521
-
-
8,018,521
09
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
72,220
-
72,220
04
24 INTEREST
1,250
-
-
1,250
M
$
12,868,796
$
35,024
$
69,666
S 12,799,130
19
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
25 SUPPLIES
$
4,700
$
217
$
-
$ 4,700
W
26 SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,700
-
-
1,700
W
27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
180,000
5,312
1,100
178,900
14
28 TRAVEL
80
-
-
80
W
29 RENTAL/LEASE
2,000
2,000
W
30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
300
-
-
300
M
31 MISCELLANEOUS
6,600
612
1,025
5,575
164
$
195,380
$
6,141
S
2,125
S 193,255
1°
HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
95,900
$
7,278
$
5,703
$ 90,197
64
33 MISCELLANEOUS
1,000
-
-
1,000
W
34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
4,000
-
-
4,000
W
$
100,900
$
7,278
$
5,703
$ 95,197
6°
EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
35 SUPPLIES
$
1,790
$
-
$
-
$ 1,790
W
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25,090
-
25,090
W
$
26,880
$
-
$
-
$ 26,880
0°
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
37 MISCELLANEOUS
$
3,000
$
-
$
(150)
$ 3,150
-54
$
3,000
$
$
(150)
$ 3,150
-5°
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123 )
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
28,200
$
-
$
-
$ 28,200
W
$
28,200
$
-
$
-
$ 28,200
04
F
O
CL
O
io
C
tv
C
IL
s
c
O
a
N
N
0
N
M
7
L
N
LL
25
Packet Pg. 232
1 7.12.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXC ISE TAX 2 (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 21,000
$ 6,956
$ 3,050
$ 17,950
150
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
469,320
-
15,539
453,781
34
3 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
668,258
4,501
56,168
612,090
M
4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
2,534
-
-
2,534
09
5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
3,428,576
-
69,759
3,358,817
29
$ 4,589,688
$ 11,457
$ 144,516
$ 4,445,172
34
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126)
6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
11 INTEREST
GWIS CATALOG FUND (127)
12 SUPPLIES
13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14 MISCELLANEOUS
15 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
CEVIEIIItYMAINTENANCUI PROVEMENT(130)
16 SALARIES AND WAGES
17 OVERTIME
18 BENEFIT S
19 UNIFORMS
20 SUPPLIES
21 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
22 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23 COMMUNICATIONS
24 TRAVEL
25 RENTAL/LEASE
26 UTILITIES
27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
28 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TIRUSTFUND (136)
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
30 SMALL EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
31 SUPPLIES
32 TRAVEL
33 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140)
34 SUPPLIES
35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142)
37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE FUND (143)
38 SUPPLIES
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
40 LAND
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
41 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
42 INTEREST
$ 673,827 $
18,817 $
17,410 $ 656,417 M
878,353
14,138
13,266 865,087 2°
144,970
-
- 144,970 00
526,057
72,339
- 526,057 M
149,820
-
- 149,820 04
110,640
-
- 110,640 09
$ 2,483,667 $
105,293 $
30,676 $ 2,452,991 14
$ 45,000 $ - $ 2,114 $ 42,886 59
6,500 - - 6,500 04
600 - - 600 04
26,300 - - 26,300 04
$ 78,400 $ - $ 2,114 $ 76,286 T
$ 119,837 $
14,060 $
14,060 $
105,777
120
3,500
30
210
3,290
6°
41,069
6,248
6,168
34,901
150
1,000
-
-
1,000
00
7,000
-
45
6,955
I4
20,000
1,638
3,690
16,310
1M
4,200
800
800
3,400
190
1,700
281
284
1,416
174
500
-
-
500
0°
11,690
2,775
1,948
9,742
170
5,565
272
267
5,298
54
500
-
-
500
04
4,000
2,567
3,868
132
970
$ 220,561 $
28,671 $
31,341 $
189,220
144
$ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 04
$ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 M
$ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 09
$ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 09
$ 1,500 $ - $ - $ 1,500 04
4,500 - - 4,500 M
5,900 - - 5,900 04
$ 11,900 $ - $ - $ 11,900 00
$ 4,050 $
273 $
94 $
3,956 24
77,535
4,254
5,719
71,816 79
6,095
73
73
6,022 1°
87,680
4,600
5,885
81,795 74
$ 5,977,492 $ - $ 114,190 $ 5,863,302 24
5,977,492 - 114,190 5,863,302 2°
$ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000 M
14,800 - - 14,800 04
199,000 - - 199,000 00
214,800 - - 214,800 04
$ 550,000 $ - $ - $ 550,000 00
61,370 - - 61,370 M
$ 611,370 $ - $ - $ 611,370 0°
O
CL
io
C
ca
C
IL
s
C
O
.01
N
O
N
M
7
L
N
LL
26
Packet Pg. 233
1 7.12.a I
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$ 95,832
$ 359
$ 58,258
$ 37,574
619
2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
63,000
-
62,656
344
999
3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
7,357,188
66,774
713,452
6,643,736
109
4 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
98,398
-
-
98,398
09
$ 7,614,418
$ 67,133
$ 834,366
$ 6,780,052
110
WATER FUND (421)
5 SALARIES AND WAGES
6 OVERTIME
7 BENEFIT S
8 UNIFORMS
9 SUPPLIES
10 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
11 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
12 SMALL EQUIPMENT
13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14 COMMUNICATIONS
15 TRAVEL
16 EXCISE TAXES
17 RENTAL/LEASE
18 INSURANCE
19 UTILITIES
20 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
21 MISCELLANEOUS
22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
23 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
24 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
25 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
26 REVENUE BONDS
27 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
28 INTEREST
STORM FUND (422)
29 SALARIES AND WAGES
30 OVERTIME
31 BENEFIT S
32 UNIFORMS
33 SUPPLIES
34 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36 COMMUNICATIONS
37 TRAVEL
38 EXCISE TAXES
39 RENTALILEASE
40INSURANCE
41 UTILITES
42 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
43 MISCELLANEOUS
44 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
45 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
46 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
47 REVENUE BONDS
48 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
49 INTEREST
$ 842,096 $
112,836 $
120,241
$ 721,855
149
24,000
3,083
3,264
20,736
149
330,100
47,134
51,867
278,233
169
4,000
355
686
3,314
179
150,000
5,499
20,467
129,533
149
2,170,000
123,474
149,684
2,020,317
79
170,000
18,365
23,934
146,066
149
11,000
-
587
10,413
59
2,237,439
96,002
49,681
2,187,758
29
30,000
1,927
3,939
26,061
139
200
-
-
200
09
1,649,700
211,492
213,695
1,436,005
139
152,590
20,901
25,598
126,992
170
107,265
98,196
122,359
(15,094)
1149
35,000
4,179
5,346
29,654
150
176,130
11,030
11,535
164,595
79
123,600
38,233
49,045
74,555
409
645,370
-
-
645,370
09
10,000
-
-
10,000
09
1,998,334
-
42,594
1,955,740
29
2,870
-
-
2,870
M
399,780
-
-
399,780
09
25,840
-
-
25,840
09
180,580
-
-
180,580
09
$ 11,475,894 $
792,707 $
894,523
$ 10,581,371
M
$ 734,284 $
124,593 $
125,774 $
608,510
179
26,000
10,242
4,759
21,241
1M
294,767
54,656
53,780
240,987
189
6,500
1,689
2,403
4,097
379
46,000
7,044
18,484
27,516
409
4,000
304
587
3,413
159
3,481,263
72,289
86,715
3,394,548
29
3,200
491
534
2,666
170
4,300
-
-
4,300
09
470,100
131,822
144,632
325,468
319
267,150
44,467
44,446
222,704
179
144,126
66,228
82,335
61,791
579
10,500
2,105
2,524
7,976
249
67,130
10,963
11,040
56,090
169
232,300
55,723
61,461
170,839
269
297,787
-
-
297,787
09
3,137,333
-
194,065
2,943,268
69
104,540
-
-
104,540
09
195,390
-
-
195,390
09
53,590
-
-
53,590
09
101,180
-
-
101,180
09
$ 9,681,440 $
582,617 $
833,537 $
8,847,903
99
F
O
CL
io
C
M
C
IL
s
c
O
N
N
0
N
M
7
L
N
LL
27
Packet Pg. 234
1 7.12.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 2,090,461
$ 299,000
$ 312,259
$ 1,778,202
15°
2 OVERTIME
95,000
21,540
31,456
63,544
3M
3 BENEFITS
847,408
128,681
124,674
722,734
15°
4 UNIFORMS
9,500
3,244
3,339
6,161
354
5 SUPPLIES
421,000
50,738
29,952
391,048
74
6 FUEL CONSUMED
60,000
12,235
-
60,000
M
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
M
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
1,566
85,279
(50,279)
2440
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,315,884
191,351
203,876
2,112,008
94
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
2,868
7,286
35,714
170
11 TRAVEL
5,000
-
-
5,000
09
12 EXCISE TAXES
978,000
181,313
198,449
779,551
2M
13 RENTAL/LEASE
317,410
54,548
52,715
264,695
17
14 INSURANCE
185,052
162,851
203,936
(18,884)
11M
15 UTILITIES
1,532,060
43,515
142,051
1,390,009
9°
16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
790,630
38,368
126,645
663,985
164
17 MISCELLANEOUS
126,350
19,683
23,700
102,650
194
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
6,388,519
-
-
6,388,519
M
19 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
12,520,297
-
-
12,520,297
M
20 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
126,500
-
-
126,500
M
21 REVENUE BONDS
89,840
-
-
89,840
M
22 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
174,610
-
-
174,610
M
23 INTEREST
356,980
-
-
356,980
M
24 DEBT ISSUE COSTS
-
1,518
-
-
M
$ 29,512,501
$ 1,213,019
$ 1,545,617
$ 27,966,884
54
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
25 REVENUE BONDS $ 810,010 $ - $ - $ 810,010 04
26 INTEREST 1,178,700 - - 1,178,700 M
$ 1,988,710 $ - $ - $ 1,988,710 v
F
O
CL
O
io
C
to
C
M
21
s
r
C
O
M
N
N
0
N
M
7
N
LL
28
Packet Pg. 235
1 7.12.a I
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 275,712
$ 45,834
$ 47,129
$ 228,583
179
2 OVERTIME
2,000
1,573
222
1,778
119
3 BENEFITS
112,077
19,335
19,100
92,977
179
4 UNIFORMS
1,500
605
646
854
4M
5 SUPPLIES
120,000
9,513
40,039
79,961
3M
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
09
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
268,000
13,497
81,457
186,543
309
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
4,749
1,924
56,076
39
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
194
223
46,527
09
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
304
309
2,691
109
11 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
09
12 RENTAL/LEASE
11,160
2,070
1,728
9,432
159
13 INSURANCE
41,261
39,334
51,903
(10,642)
1269
14 UTILITIES
14,000
2,526
3,276
10,724
2M
15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
60,000
3,886
2,002
57,998
39
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
1,588
1,396
10,604
129
17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
915,000
49,807
6,008
908,992
19
$ 1,942,460
$ 194,816
$ 257,364
$ 1,685,096
139
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
442,074
$
51,188
$
43,726
$
398,348
109
19 OVERTIME
2,000
303
-
2,000
09
20 BENEFITS
159,538
17,364
18,703
140,835
129
21 SUPPLIES
5,000
1,605
1,750
3,250
359
22 SMALL EQUIPMENT
357,900
2,320
8,341
349,559
29
23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
61,860
2,478
2,472
59,388
49
24 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
8,690
7,807
50,963
1M
25 TRAVEL
1,500
-
-
1,500
09
26 RENTAL/LEASE
7,460
733
743
6,717
109
27 REPAIRS & MAINT ENANCE
381,920
83,525
203,737
178,183
5M
28 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
88
16
4,984
09
29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
56,000
-
-
56,000
09
$
1,539,022
$
168,294
$
287,295
$
1,251,727
199
FIREMAN'S PENSION FUND (617)
30 BENEFITS
$
-
$
6,428
$
-
$
-
09
31 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
10,254
09
$
-
$
16,682
$
-
S
-
09
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
144,446,560
$
11,360,819
$
13,700,513
S
130,746,047
99
O
CL
O
io
C
M
C
LL
z
C
O
M
N
N
O
N
M
7
L
N
LL
29
Packet Pg. 236
7.12.a
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F IDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2022 Amended 2/28/2021 2/28/2022 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
SATELLITE OFFICE
COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PARKS & RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
$ 497,900 $
53,681 $
43,670 $
454,230
9%
443,913
55,740
59,226
384,687
13%
824,831
132,066
135,524
689,307
16%
1,368,755
183,450
187,919
1,180,836
14%
_
-
139,396
-
-
0%
0
CL
2,034,511
226,074
380,532
1,653,979
19%
lY
971,780
142,526
155,234
816,546
16%
.70
13,877,484
2,845,113
2,938,380
10,939,104
21%
M
C
13,375,470
1,856,572
1,945,020
11,430,450
15%
LL
166,576
-
8,348
158,228
5%
C
719,388
85,831
72,230
647,158
10%
0
3,791,859
448,394
661,303
3,130,556
17%
N
459,109
-
21,465
437,644
5%
O
N
M
5,081,735
655,977
651,988
4,429,747
13%
3,459,449
517,863
503,819
2,955,630
15%
2,298,775
294,332
369,398
1,929,377
16%
N
$ 49,371,535 $
7,637,016 $
8,134,057 $
41,237,478
16%
O
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
Title
2022 Amended
Budget
2/28/2021
Expenditures
2/28/2022
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
WATER UTILITYFUND
$ 11,475,894
$ 792,707
$ 894,523
$ 10,581,371
8%
STORM UTILITY FUND
9,681,440
582,617
833,537
8,847,903
9%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
29,512,501
1,213,019
1,545,617
27,966,884
5%
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,710
-
-
1,988,710
0%
$ 52,658,545
$ 2,588,343
$ 3,273,677
$ 49,384,868
6%
30
Packet Pg. 237
1 7.12.a I
Page 1 of 2
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2022 Amended 2/28/2021 2/28/2022 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES
BENEFIT S
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
O FFIC E O F MAYO R
SALARIES AND WAGES
BENEFIT S
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES
BENEFIT S
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
MUNICIPAL C O URT
SALARIES AND WAGES
BENEFIT S
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
BENEFIT S
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
$ 204,132 $
32,572 $
25,901 $
178,231
13%
121,868
16,707
14,188
107,680
12%
2,000
1,494
163
1,837
8%
169,900
2,907
3,419
166,481
2%
$ 497,900 $
53,681 $
43,670 $
454,230
9%
$
232,296
$
38,249
$
40,066
$
192,230
17%
81,787
14,075
14,439
67,348
18%
O
1,500
124
1,357
143
90%
C
128,330
3,293
3,364
124,966
3%
W
$
443,913
$
55,740
$
59,226
$
384,687
13%
$
398,299
$
65,989
$
76,448
$
321,851
19%
142,526
27,556
28,671
113,855
20%
13,600
685
246
13,354
2%
LL
270,406
37,836
30,158
240,248
11%
s
$
824,831
$
132,066
$
135,524
$
689,307
16%
O
04
$
910,606
$
124,687
$
129,827
$
780,779
14%
N
217,654
37,929
36,915
180,739
17%
C
11,600
-
1,243
10,357
11%
N
228,895
20,835
19,934
208,961
9%
$
1,368,755
$
183,450
$
187,919
$
1,180,836
14%
L
$
-
$
66,460
$
-
$
0%
-
27,520
-
0%
v
0
-
403
-
0%
O
-
45,014
-
0%
Q-
$
-
$
139,396
$
-
$
-
0%
ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,301,073
$
123,623
$
219,500
$
1,081,573
17%
BENEFITS
413,858
41,692
74,226
339,632
18%
SUPPLIES
13,000
1,008
2,259
10,741
17%
SERVICES
306,580
59,750
84,547
222,033
28%
$
2,034,511
$
226,074
$
380,532
$
1,653,979
19%
CITY ATPO RNEY
SERVICES
$
971,780
$
142,526
$
155,234
$
816,546
16%
$
971,780
$
142,526
$
155,234
$
816,546
16%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS
145,504
8,868
14,684
130,820
10%
SUPPLIES
5,000
7
-
5,000
0%
SERVICES
11,860,982
2,786,238
2,873,696
8,987,286
24%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,435,000
50,000
50,000
1,385,000
3%
DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL
55,170
-
-
55,170
0%
DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST
274,078
274,078
0%
$
13,877,484
$
2,845,113
$
2,938,380
$
10,939,104
21%
PO LIC E SERVIC ES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
8,723,512
$
1,246,585
$
1,289,952
$
7,433,560
15%
BENEFITS
2,994,876
446,844
449,778
2,545,098
15%
SUPPLIES
281,569
24,632
14,102
267,467
5%
SERVICES
1,375,513
138,511
191,189
1,184,325
14%
$
13,375,470
$
1,856,572
$
1,945,020
$
11,430,450
15%
S ATELLITE O FFIC E
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
25,000
$
-
$
-
$
25,000
0%
BENEFIT S
5,000
-
5,000
0%
SUPPLIES
12,000
8,019
3,981
67%
SERVICES
124,576
329
124,247
0%
$
166,576
$
$
8,348
$
158,228
5%
31
Packet Pg. 238
1 7.12.a I
Page 2 of 2
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2022 Amended
2/28/2021
2/28/2022
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 365,627
$ 53,887
$ 33,357
$ 332,270
9%
BENEFITS
111,361
15,227
10,865
100,496
10%
SUPPLIES
4,075
41
184
3,891
5%
SERVICES
238,325
16,676
27,825
210,500
12%
$ 719,388
$ 85,831
$ 72,230
$ 647,158
10%
DEVELO PMEVT S ERVIC ES /PLANNING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,978,832
$
290,566
$
384,754
$
1,594,078
19%
BENEFITS
681,706
107,524
126,981
554,725
19%
SUPPLIES
19,400
523
433
18,967
2%
SERVICES
1,111,921
49,781
149,136
962,785
13%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
0%
$
3,791,859
$
448,394
$
661,303
$
3,130,556
17%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,496
$
-
$
10,782
$
90,714
11%
BENEFIT S
29,113
-
2,165
26,948
7%
SUPPLIES
15,000
-
59
14,942
0%
SERVICES
313,500
-
8,460
305,040
3%
459,109
21,465
437,644
5%
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
2,627,863
$
386,977
$
365,506
$
2,262,357
14%
BENEFITS
865,945
139,402
133,623
732,322
15%
SUPPLIES
166,640
16,626
22,326
144,314
13%
SERVICES
1,421,287
112,972
130,534
1,290,753
9%
$
5,081,735
$
655,977
$
651,988
$
4,429,747
13%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
387,424
$
49,897
$
21,156
$
366,268
5%
BENEFIT S
126,689
17,238
10,695
115,994
8%
SUPPLIES
9,600
63
1,063
8,537
11%
SERVICES
90,400
14,521
13,723
76,677
15%
$
614,113
$
81,720
$
46,637
$
567,476
8%
FACILITIFS MAINTENANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES
860,456
138,057
146,231
714,225
17%
BENEFITS
369,679
57,084
56,253
313,426
15%
SUPPLIES
128,000
23,187
9,563
118,437
7%
SERVICES
670,460
76,005
157,350
513,110
23%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
270,180
-
-
270,180
0%
$
2,298,775
$
294,332
$
369,398
$
1,929,377
16%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,866,128
$
289,455
$
305,443
$
1,560,685
16%
BENEFITS
702,578
117,673
117,782
584,796
17%
SUPPLIES
2,200
795
-
2,200
0%
SERVICES
274,430
28,220
33,957
240,473
12%
$
2,845,336
$
436,144
$
457,182
$
2,388,154
16%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$
49,371,535
$
7,637,016
$
8,134,057
$
41,237,478
16%
O
CL
O
io
C
M
C
IL
s
r
C
O
z
N
N
O
N
M
7
N
LL
32
Packet Pg. 239
I 7.12.a I
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
& SUBFUNDS
2/28/2022
2/28/2022
Q1 YTD
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
001-General Fund
$ 12,846,678
$ 4,757,128
$ (3,423,881
�E
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
201,869
201,869
(53,349
Q.
011-Risk Management Reserve Fund
25,000
25,000
-
a�
012-ContingencyReserve Fund
1,782,150
1,782,150
-
6
v
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
16,422
16,421
-
c
016-Building Maintenance
4,412,371
4,412,371
12,371
ii
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
848,617
848,616
-
,
t
Total General Fund & Subfunds
$ 20,133,107
$ 12,043,555
$
- $ (3,464,858
c
a
N
N
*$8,067,160 of the fund balance in Fund 001
added to the $1,78150 balance in Fund 012, represent the required
2,
N
20% operating reserve.
ca
There are no interfund loans outstanding at
this time.
L
u_
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ----
FUNDS 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Q1 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
General Fund & Subfunds
$ 20,133,107 $ 12,043,555
$ (3,464,858
Special Revenue
19,115,235 17,544,413
687,748
Capital Projects
2,817,764 3,560,445
(814,208
Total Governmental Funds
$ 42,066,106 $ 33,148,413
$ - $ (3,591,318
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
33
Packet Pg. 240 1
7.12.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
SPECIAL REVENUE
2/28/2022 2/28/2022
Q1 YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 76,158 $ 76,524
$ 528
1 1 1 - Street Fund
729,198 592,130
(234,215 0
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve
2,539,727 1,380,609
321,477
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
718,576 720,830
65,597
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
79,934 66,557
8,400 'U
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
84,839 85,097
7,790
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund
14,595 14,642
250
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
101,708 97,476
5,195 >+
125 - Real Estate Tax2
4,269,470 4,187,323
194,311
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 *
3,635,007 3,458,294
303,682 0
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
363,978 365,012
60,876 N
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
277,092 278,013
9,413 c
136 - Parks Trust Fund
170,791 171,358
1,182 N
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,125,860 1,129,586
12,091 ca
138- Sister City Comm ission
15,667 15,719
108
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
58,231 58,231
29,100
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd
175,424 168,031
16,010 ..
142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
4,658,190 4,658,190
(114,190 0
143 -Tree Fund
20,791 20,791
143 0.
Total Special Revenue
$ 19,115,235 $ 17,544,413
$ - $ 687,748
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for 'U
the purchase of Open Space.
ii
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
0
2
N
N
O
N
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES �+
c�
ENTERPRISE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
FUNDS
2/28/2022 2/28/2022
Q1 YTD u_
Fund Balance Cash Balance
c
m
421 -Water Utility Fund
$ 30,102,151 $ 7,260,392
$ 759,551 t
422 -Storm Utility Fund "
16,699,638 5,970,353
734,330 r
423-Sewer/WWTPUtility Fund
62,337,986 16,758,240
1,847,788 Q
424 - Bond Reserve Fund
843,963 843,963
2
411 -Combined Utility Operation
25,960 58,179
25,960
Total Enterprise Funds
$ 110,009,699 $ 30,891,127
$ - $ 3,367,631
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
34
Packet Pg. 241
7.12.a
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
----
CITY-WIDE
2/28/2022 2/28/2022
Q1
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
Governmental Funds
$ 42,066,106 $ 33,148,413
$
(3,591,318
Enterprise Funds
110,009,699 30,891,127
3,367,631 00.
Internal Services Fund
10,337,386 5,903,427
a)
(30,109 W
Total City-wide Total
$ 162,413,190 $ 69,942,967
$ - $
(253,796 2
U
c
c�
c
ii
2,
t
c
0
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
N
N
N
O
N
fC
3
L
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES o
INTERNAL SERVICE
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL
0.
----
FUNDS
2/28/2022 2/28/2022
Q1
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
c
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
$ 9,344,327 $ 5,086,490
$
60,861 u_
21
512 -Technology Rental Fund
993,059 816,937
(90,971
0
Total Internal Service Funds
$ 10,337,386 $ 5,903,427
$ - $
(30,109 2
N
N
O
N
fC
3
L
LL
d
E
L
V
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
35
Packet Pg. 242
7.13
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Approval of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2 Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On September 9, 2017, City Council approved Local Agency Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99
Revitalization & Gateway Project.
On December 17, 2019, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99
Revitalization & Gateway Project.
On July 21, 2020, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99
Revitalization & Gateway Project.
On October 19, 2021, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99
Revitalization & Gateway Project.
On April 12, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed
on the April 19, 2022 consent agenda for full Council approval.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Supplemental Agreement.
Narrative
The Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2 project consists of the addition of a continuous
landscaped raised median along Highway 99 from 2441h St. SW to 2101h St. SW with mid -block left turn
pockets, a HAWK signal approximately 600' north of 2341h St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the
corridor. This project will improve corridor safety by reducing high -angle vehicle accident rates with the
removal of the center two-way left turn lane. The proposed HAWK signal will improve active
transportation safety for pedestrians attempting to cross the corridor between the existing signalized
intersection at 238th St. SW and 228th St. SW.
The supplemental agreement will provide the following professional services during the construction
phase:
Meetings: attendance to pre -construction and weekly meetings with the contractor (as needed);
Office Engineering: completion of submittal reviews, shop Drawings, and responses to Request
For Information (RFI's);
Change orders: completion of plan and specs revisions based on Change Orders; and
Packet Pg. 243
7.13
As -Built plans: completion of As -Built plans and ADA curb ramp certification / Maximum Extent
Feasible (MEF's) documents.
Staff and consultant have agreed on a scope of services and budget for the project in the total amount
of $91,457, including $4,514 in management reserve. The project was advertised on March 31, 2022
with a bid opening scheduled to take place on April 21, 2022.
The services provided under this supplemental agreement will be funded by the Connecting Washington
State transportation funds.
Attachments:
Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment_5_revised
Packet Pg. 244
7.13.a
Aim
� Washington State
vI/ Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement
Organization and Address
Number 5
Shea, Carr, & Jewell, Inc.
8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200
Original Agreement Number
Lacey, WA 98516
LA-9146
Phone: 360-352-1465
Project Number
Execution Date
Completion Date
HLP-CNWA(13)
9/13/2017
6/30/2023
Project Title
New Maximum Amount Payable
Highway 99 Gateway/Revitalization Project
$1,585,222
Description of Work
SCOPE, FEE AND SCHEDULE REVISIONS: To add Services During Construction (SDC) Work including Project Management,
Meetings, Office Engineering, Change Orders, and As -Built Plans as noted below and in Exhibits A and B.
The Local Agency of City of Edmonds
desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with Shea, Carr, & Jewell, Inc.
and executed on September 13, 2017 and identified as Agreement No. LA-9146
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
See attachment A for Scope of Work to add Services During Construction (SDC), including Project Management, Meeting, Office
Engineering, Change Orders, As -Built Plans, Management Reserve and Expenses.
11
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days
for completion of the work to read: Completion date to extend to June 30, 2023.
III
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
See Exhibit B, which estimates the Work for SDC to be $91,457
Revised Maximum Amount Payable $1,585,222 .
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate
spaces below and return to this office for final action.
By: Lisa M Reid, PE, PMP I Principal
Consuitan i 'ature
M
Approving Authority Signature
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005
Date
Packet Pg. 245
7.13.a
.►
-.4510+
1—�
SCJ ALLIANCE
CONSULTING SERVICES
EXHIBIT B
SCOPE OF WORK
HIGHWAY 99-GATEWAY REVITALIZATION PROJECT — STAGE 2
Services During Construction
Edmonds, WA
Prepared For: Bertrand Hauss / City of Edmonds
Jaime Hawkins / City of Edmonds
Prepared By: Lisa Reid, PE, PMP, Principal
Date Prepared: April 13, 2022
Overview
This project is amended to add services during construction for the Stage 2 project. This project was advertised
for construction on March 31, 2022 and will construct improvements to approximately 2.25 miles of SR 99
through the City of Edmonds (COE). The improvements will generally be limited to the median and the existing
curbs, gutters & sidewalks will remain.
The proposed work extends along SR 99 from S. 244th Street to S. 210th Street and includes construction of a
raised center median with hardscaping, landscaping, and irrigation; the addition of drainage inlets and piping;
curb ramps; pavement markings; signing; gateway and artwork sign foundations; concrete garden walls;
landscaping and irrigation; a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK) signal approximately 600' north of 234th Street
SW; and connection to the existing interconnect system including directional drilling of some interconnect
conduits.
This Scope of Work will add the following, new Phases of work:
• Phase 30 — Stage 2, SDC Project Management & Meetings
• Phase 31— Stage 2, SDC Office Engineering
• Phase 32 — Stage 2, SDC Change Orders
• Phase 33 — Stage 2, SDC As -Built Drawings
• Phase 34 — Stage 2, SDC Management Reserve
• Phase 35 — Stage 2, SDC Expenses
Although we already have Project Management (Phase 01) and Expenses (Phase 99) phases, those will be closed
out when the project is awarded, and the new Phases will assist with summarizing construction related support
moving forward.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 550 • Seattle, WA 98101 • Office 205.639.5454 • Fax 360.352.1509 • scjalliance.com
Packet Pg. 246
7.13.a
��l�i
400- -410-
0- Edmonds Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization, Stage 2
SCJ ALLIANCE Amendment 5 (SDC) o
CONSULTING SERVICES Page 2 of 5 fC
General Scope Assumptions
1. No Federal Funding is included in this project.
2. COE is contracting with a 3rd party consultant to provide construction management (CM) and inspection
support separately.
3. Pay Estimates will not be reviewed.
4. COE anticipates that they and their CM Contractor will review most submittals, RFIs, and issue field
clarifications with minimal SDC Support from the SCJ Alliance (SCJ).
5. This scope includes the review of shop drawings, including those for signal poles and raised median
transitions.
6. One (1) change order is included in this Scope of Work to add Gateway Signs and Artwork and to clarify
construction details for them.
7. No field work or inspection is included in this scope of work.
8. The Contractor is required to keep a redline set of contract plans that will be provided to SCJ for the
preparation of formal as -built drawings.
9. No subconsultant services are included in this Scope of Work.
10. Formal project submittal, RFI, and other logs will be managed by COE and their CM Contractor.
11. The Construction Contract includes 150 Working Days, or 30 weeks. With potential weather delays, non-
working days, completion of As-Builts after construction is complete, and final invoicing and close-out, it
is assumed that this contract last 40 weeks.
Hours were estimated by phase for the Phases of work described and are based on the assumptions provided by
COE, the estimated construction cost ($5.25M) and the number of working days (150 days). If additional effort is
required, additional fee may need to be added.
Scope of Work
Phase 30 Stage 2, SDC Project Management & Meetings
Work in this Phase includes overall contract and project management, tracking of requests, coordination of
team members to respond, and attendance at the pre -construction and weekly construction meetings. The Level
of Effort (LOE) is estimated based on the assumptions above and following scope of work.
1) Contract Administration
• Manage Contracting
• Monthly Invoicing and Progress Reports
• Team Coordination and Management
• Scope, Schedule & Budget Monitoring and Control
• Monitor and Track SDC Requests and Responses
• Document Controls
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 550 • Seattle, WA 98101 • Office 205.639.5454 • Fax 360.352.1509 • scjalliance.com
Packet Pg. 247
7.13.a
ow
SC.J ALLIANCE
CONSULTING SERVICES
2) Meetings
• Pre -construction Meeting
Edmonds Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization, Stage 2
Amendment 5 (SDC)
Page 3 of 5
o Engineer of Record will attend a 2-hour virtual pre -construction meeting, including 1 hour of
preparation.
• Weekly Construction Meetings
o Consultant Staff will attend on an as -needed basis. To set the budget, it was assumed that
the Engineer of Record, or one of the discipline leads will attend up to eight (8) of
approximately thirty (30) weekly meetings, requiring a total of twelve (12) hours or labor.
o Meeting minutes will be prepared others.
o No preparation is required.
Deliverables
• Monthly Invoices & Progress Reports, via PDF
• SDC Request Tracking Logs, via Google Sheet Link
Phase 31 Stage 2, Office Engineering
Work in this Phase includes general office engineering tasks to support the construction management team. Per
the assumptions above, this effort is anticipated to be minimal based on the assumptions above and following
scope of work and a budget of 1% of the Engineer's Estimate was assumed ($52,500).
1) Submittals
• Provide timely review of the Construction Contractor's submittals. A due date will be transmitted
with each request for review.
2) Shop Drawings
• Provide timely review of the Construction Contractor's shop drawings for signal poles, low profile
barrier curb transitions, and others as needed. A due date will be transmitted with each request for
review.
3) Requests for Information (RFIs)
• Provide timely review of the Construction Contractor's RFIs as needed. A due date will be
transmitted with each request for review.
• Prepare sketches, CAD drawings, and written instructions as needed to illustrate the response to
RFIs as needed.
Deliverables
• Submittal, Shop Drawing & RFI Responses via PDF
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 550 • Seattle, WA 98101 • Office 205.639.5454 • Fax 360.352.1509 • scjalliance.com
Packet Pg. 248
7.13.a
��l�i
400- -410-
0- Edmonds Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization, Stage 2
SCJ ALLIANCE Amendment 5 (SDC) o
CONSULTING SERVICES Page 4 of 5 M
N
a+
Phase 32 Stage 2, Change Orders
Work in this Phase includes preparation of change orders as requested. While the goal is to have no change 3
orders, one will be required to provide additional information for the gateway sign and artwork installations.
1) Sign and Artwork Change Order
• Coordinate with COE's Gateway Sign and Artwork Consultant, HBB, to prepare and issue a change
order as needed to incorporate the final plans for construction of the gateways and sign work.
• This include structural engineering review of sign and artwork foundations to ensure assumptions
made during the 100% design were adequate for the final designs.
• Minor design work will be needed to revise prior plan sheets and details and issue new sheets for
this Work.
• Develop and review quantity and change order preparation by HBB for issuance as a change order,
and coordination with COE and their CM Contractor to issue the change order.
2) Additional Change Order
• One additional change order is included, with an LOE of 20 hours total.
Deliverables
• Change order for Gateway Signs and Artwork including revised plans and specifications as needed
• Up to one (1) additional Change order including revised plans and specifications as needed.
Phase 33 Stage 2, As -Built Plans
Work in this Phase includes review of the Contractor's redlines, coordination of clarifications, review and
certification (or preparation of Maximum Extent Feasible (MEF) documentation) for curb ramp construction, and
preparation of CAD As -Built Drawings for the Project, including up to 250 sheets.
1) As -Built Review and Clarifications
• Review the redline plans prepared by the Construction Contractor and coordination with COE and
the Construction Contractor to clarify any questions. This does not include verification of the
installed improvements except as noted below.
2) ADA Curb Ramp Certification or MEF
• Review the construction survey of the ADA features constructed on the project and determination if
the final curb ramps meet ADA requirements.
• Certification of curb ramps meeting ADA requirements
• Coordination with COE to have the Contractor make corrections or development of MEF
documentation for any curb ramps that do not meet ADA requirements
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 550 • Seattle, WA 98101 • Office 205.639.5454 • Fax 360.352.1509 • scjalliance.com
Packet Pg. 249
7.13.a
��l�i
400- -410-
0- Edmonds Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization, Stage 2
SCJ ALLIANCE Amendment 5 (SDC) o
CONSULTING SERVICES Page 5 of 5 fC
3) As -Built Plans
• Development of AutoCAD As-Builts based on incorporation of the redline revisions into the
Conformed AutoCAD files.
• Incorporation of the ADA As -Built survey into the Civil3D surface and AutoCAD As -Built Plans.
• Provide up to 3 (three) 11x17 copies of the As -Built Plans to COE.
• Provide up to 1 (one) 22x34 copy of the As -Built Plans to COE.
4) Close-out and Transmittal
• Archive the CAD files for the project onto a DVD for COE and SCJ Alliance storage.
Deliverables
• ADA curb ramp certification or MEF documentation (PDF)
• AutoCAD and Civil3D As -Built Files (DVD)
• Up to three (3) 11x17 and one (1) copy of As -Built plans (Printed Copies)
Phase 34 Stage 2, SDC Management Reserve
Work in this Phase includes specific requests that do not fit in the Scope of Work or LOE of the other Phases and
must be approved, in advance, by the City. A budget of 5% of the subtotal was ($90,334) was assumed ($4,514).
Phase 35 Stage 2, SDC Expenses
Expenses will be charged on a time and material basis and include items such as travel, mileage, plan
reproduction, etc. A budget of $500 will be included in the contract for expenses.
End of Proposal
Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment 5—SCOPE .2022-0413.docx
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 550 • Seattle, WA 98101 • Office 205.639.5454 • Fax 360.352.1509 • scjalliance.com
Packet Pg. 250
7.13.a
Exhibit C
Consultant Fee Determination Summary
SCJ Alliance
Client: City of Edmonds
Project: Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage
Job #: 00-077501
File Name: Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment_5_FEE_2022-0406.xism
Consultant Fee Determination
DIRECT SALARY COST
Classification
Hours
Direct Hourly Rate
Principal
99.0
$102.40
E4 Engineer
131.0
$51.75
E3 Engineer
188.4
$44.42
E4 Engineer
62.0
$47.45
L4 Landscape
53.0
$38.95
PM1 Project Manager
33.0
$40.71
Project Coordinator)
20.2
$31.80
OVERHEAD
Overhead Rate:
151.79%
Direct Salary Cost: $32,278
FIXED FEE
Fixed Fee Rate:
30.00%
Direct Salary Cost: $32,278
TOTAL SALARY COST
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
i�
SCJ ALLIANCE
Template Version: 8/5/2021
Contract Type: LAG Contract
Total Direct Salary Cost
Overhead Cost
Fixed Fee Cost
Total Salary Cost
Amount
$10,138
$6,779
$8,369
$2,942
$2,064
$1,344
$642
$32,278
$48,995
$9,683
$90,957
Travel, Printing, etc. Estimate of the Direct Salary Costs $500
Expenses Subtotal: $500
Total Estimated Budget: $91,457
4/13/2022 Packet Pg. 251
7.13.a
Consultant Labor Hour Estimate
SO Alliance
Client:
City of Edmonds
Project:
Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2
Job4:
00-077501
File Name:
Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment_5_FEE_2022-0406.xism
SCJ ALLIANCE
coaa-mo 3CnvK[S
Phase &
Phase &Task Title
Task No.
Principal
E4 Engineer E3 Engineer
E4 Engineer
L4 Landscape
PIN Project
Mana er
g
Project
Cordinator I
Total Direct Labor
Hours &Cost
Total Cost
PHASE 30 STAGE 2, SDC PROJECT MANAGEMENT & MEETINGS
Task 1 Contract Administration
1
Manage Contract
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 468
2
Monthly Invoicing and Progress Reports
5.0
5.0
$ 1,443
3
Team Coordination and Management
10.0
10.0
$ 2,886
4
Scope, Schedule & Budget Monitoring and Control
5.0
5.0
$ 1,443
5
Monitor and Track SDC Requests and Responses
10.0
10.0
$ 1,458
6
Document Controls
20.0
20.0
$ 2,503
Subtotal Hours:
21.0
10.0
20.0
2.0
53.0
$ 10,201
Task 2 Meetings
1
Pre -Construction Meeting
3.0
3.0
$ 866
2
Weekly Construction Meetings (8)
4.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
12.0
$ 2,147
Subtotal Hours:
7.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
15.0
$ 3,013
Total Phase Hours:1
28.0 10.0 24.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
68.0
$ 68
Total Phase Direct Labor:
$2,867.31 $517.50 $1,066.08 $94.91 $38.95 $40.71 $63.60
$4,689.06
$ 13,213
PHASE 31 STAGE 2, SDC OFFICE ENGINEERING
Task 1 Task Title
1
Submittals
Shop Drawings
RFls
8.0
8.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
32.0
$ 5,443
2
4.0
8.0
8.0
20.0
$ 3,391
3
40.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
40.0
20.0
10.2
290.2
$ 43,666
Subtotal Hours:
52.0
96.0
60.0
56.0
44.0
24.0
10.2
342.2
$ 52,500
Total Phase Hours:1
52.0
96.0
60.0
56.0
44.0
24.0
10.2
342.2
$ 342
Total Phase Direct Labor:
$5,325.00
$4,968.00
$2,665.20
$2,657.45
$1,713.71
$977.12
$324.36
$18,630.85
$ 52,500
Q
2 of Packet Pg. 252
7.13.a
Consultant Labor Hour Estimate
SCJ Alliance
Client:
City of Edmonds
Project:
Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2
Job 4:
00-077501
File Name:
Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment_5_FEE_2022-0406.xism
SCJ ALLIANCE
coaa-mo 3CnvK[S
Phase &
Phase &Task Title Principal
Task No.
E4 Engineer
E3 Engineer
E4 Engineer
L4 Landscape
PM1 Project
Manager
g
Project
Coordinator I
Total Direct Labor
Hours &Cost
Total Cost
PHASE 32 STAGE 2, SDC CHANGE ORDERS
Task 1 Sign and Artwork Change Order
1
Coordination with HBB
1.0
8.0
9.0
$ 1,290
2
Revision of Civil Drawings
1.0
8.0
2.0
2.0
13.0
$ 1,739
3
Package Preparation
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 539
4
Estimate
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 539
Subtotal Hours:
4.0
20.0
2.0
2.0
28.0
$ 4,107
Task 2 Additional Change Order
1
Revision of Civil Drawings
1.0
4.0
8.0
2.0
2.0
17.0
$ 2,322
2
Package Preparation
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 539
3
Estimate
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 539
Subtotal Hours:
3.0
4.0
12.0
2.0
2.0
23.0
$ 3,400
Total Phase Hours:
7.0
4.0
32.0 4.0 4.0
51.0
$ 51
Total Phase Direct Labor:
$716.83
$207.00
$1,421.44 $155.79 $162.85
$2,663.91
$ 7,507
PHASE 33 STAGE 2, SDC AS -BUILT PLANS
Task 1 Sign and Artwork Change Order
1
As -Built Review and Clarifications
1.0
4.0
4.0
9.0
$ 1,372.55
2
ADA Curb Ramp Certification or MEF
1.0
12.0
13.0
$ 2,038.48
3
As -Built Plans
1.0
60.0
61.0
$ 7,798.83
4
Close-out and Transmittal
4.0
4.0
4.0
12.0
$ 2,013.38
Subtotal Hours:
7.0
16.0
68.0
4.0
95.0
$ 13,223.24
Total Phase Hours:
7.0
16.0 68.0
4.0
95.0
$ 95.0
Total Phase Direct Labor:
$716.83
$828.00 $3,020.56
$127.20
$4,692.59
$ 13,223.24
PHASE 34 STAGE 2, SDC MANAGEMENT RESERVE
Task 1 Management Reserve
1 Management Reserve
5.0
5.0
4.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
30.4
$ 4,514
Subtotal Hours:
5.0
5.0
4.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
30.4
$ 4,514
C
d
E
t
0
t6
y+
Q
3of4 Packet Pg. 253
7.13.a
Consultant Labor Hour Estimate
SO Alliance
Client:
City of Edmonds
Project:
Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2
Job 4:
00-077501
File Name:
Edmonds_Hwy99_Stg2_Amendment_5_FEE_2022-0406.xism
SCJ ALLIANCE
coaa—mo 3CnvK[S
Phase & Phase & Task Title
Task No.
Principal
E4 Engineer
E3 Engineer
E4 Engineer
L4 Landscape
PM Project
Manager
Project
Coordinator
Total Direct Labor
Hours & Cost
Total Cost
Total Phase Hours:
5.0
5.0
4.4
4.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
30.4
$ 30
Total Phase Direct Labor:
$512.02t$,58,75�$195.45
$189.82
$155.79
$162.85
$127.20
$1,601.88
$ 4,514
Total Hours All Phases
99.0
131.0
188.4
62.0
53.0
33.0
20.2
586.6
$ 587
Total Direct Labor Estimate All Phases
$10,137.98
$6,779.25
$8,368.73
$2,942.18
$2,064.24
$1,343.55
$642.36
$32,278.29
$ 90,957
Indirect Costs
Reimbursable Expenses:
Total:
Travel, Printing, etc.
$ 500
$ 91,457
4 of 4 Packet Pg. 254
7.14
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Park Planner and Capital Project Manager Job Description Approval
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Angie Feser
Background/History
The new position of Park Planner and Capital Project Manager was approved by Council during the 2022
Budget process both in late 2021 and again in March of 2022. This process is for Councils consideration
of approval of the job description as attached.
This position will support the department's efforts in park planning and development, managing capital
projects both completed with in-house staff and contracted services, and providing support in the
department's land acquisition and grant application and management efforts. Projects will include
managing Parks Maintenance backlog items, development of Parks capital replacement program,
managing upcoming park renovations and improvements as well as significant planning projects.
Qualifications will require knowledge and expertise in project / construction management, park design
and planning, and landscape architecture with a working knowledge of urban planning and engineering
principles.
Recruitment is expected to begin immediately following Council approval of the job description.
Staff Recommendation
Council approve the attached Park Planner and Capital Project Manager job description.
Attachments:
Park Planner Capital Project Manager FINAL
Packet Pg. 255
7.14.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Park Planner & Capital Project Manager
Department: Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Pay Grade: NR-36
Human Services
Bargaining Unit: Non -Represented FLSA Status: Exempt
Revised Date: 3/17/2022 Reports To: Department Director
POSITION PURPOSE:
Under the direction of the Director of Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services, conduct park planning,
capital project management, and contract administration responsibilities. Specific functions depend on current
projects and may include technical, administrative, or a variety of field, office, or related assignments. Work in this
position requires a high degree of independent judgment and action in planning park projects, resolving technical
problems, and administering projects within the framework of established policies. Apply a high degree of
knowledge and expertise in project / construction management, park design and planning, and landscape
architecture with a working knowledge of urban planning and engineering principles.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees
in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may
not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties.
Project Management: manage park, trail and open space acquisition, design and construction of
capital development and major maintenance projects. Project management includes assisting with,
conducting cultural resource studies, cost estimates, equity analysis, environmental review, and
documentation, preparing related project scopes. Prepare technical and administrative reports and
correspondence. Develop and administer project budgets, schedule work tasks, and manage
consultant teams including coordinating consultant selection by drafting request for proposals (RFP)
and request for qualifications (RFQ), perform bid analysis, manage contracts, and process invoices.
Construction Management: Manage the advertisement, bid, and award of park improvement
projects. Administration of contracts, plan review, negotiating scope, fee, and schedules,
coordinate project close-out, budget reconciliation, prepare reports, manage project documentation,
prepare final as-builts, and provide grant reporting documentation. Perform regular inspections of
construction projects to ensure compliance with plans and specifications, including safety
requirements and other applicable standards; check appropriateness and sustainability of materials
and methods used in construction.
Design: Plan and design research and evaluation methods; gather research, analyze, and evaluate
data; and prepare recommendations or alternatives for various design amenities, programs, issues,
or policies. This includes creating concept -level sketches, schematics, graphics, and plans for park
and recreation improvements or other public facilities relating to public recreation and
landscape/hardscape features.
Park Planner & Capital Projects Manager Last Reviewed-
Packet Pg. 256
7.14.a
2 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Park Planner & Capital Projects Manager
• Permit and Plans Review: Prepare and oversee preparation of a variety of permit and environmental
review documents such as City permits, Environmental Impact Statements, State Environmental
Policy Act checklists, and required by regulatory agencies. Review construction documents,
environmental and other studies, and related materials for accuracy, best practices and
appropriateness for park development projects, and compliance with pertinent lawns, rules, and
regulations.
• Prepare Project Documentation: prepare scope of work, vicinity maps, site analyses, design and
construction documents, specifications, permit applications, cost estimates environmental checklists
and documentation, bid documents, and presentation materials. Prepare agenda items, budget
materials and other documents for City Council.
• Public Outreach: Plan any necessary public involvement process and represent the department at
various meetings. Prepare and deliver presentations; provide information to the public, Boards and
Commissions, City Council, and media to obtain feedback on projects and plans. Ensure equitable
project outreach and engagement; coordinate marketing efforts including web and social media
content. Support communication efforts including website updates, press releases and written
articles related to parks capital program and projects.
• Grant Development: prepare and administer grant applications, including preparation of technical
project information, preliminary budgets, presentation of information, and relevant graphic
attachments.
• Level of Service & Comprehensive Planning: examine level of service including needs,
improvements, and renovation; analyze existing and potential sites for park acquisition and
development; analyze impact of current and future park capital projects on level of service. Prepare
and present updates of the Parks Capital Facilities Program, budget amendments, and relevant
components of the Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan.
• Partnership Management: create and sustain meaningful and mutually beneficial partnerships with
public agencies, the private sector, and private non-profit organizations to achieve community goals
for acquisition, development, and programming.
• Parkland Acquisitions: assist or lead in acquiring park properties, negotiate purchase and sale
agreements, obtain easements, and granting of license agreements for use of park land.
• Equipment Selection: facilitate selection, purchase, and installation of park amenities such as
signage, site furniture, play equipment, and landscaping.
• Park Impact Fee Program: assist with annual tracking and reporting of impact fee program; rate
study updates; and related capital facility project list updates.
Required Knowledge of:
• A thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of parks and recreation facility planning,
design and construction, and development practices, including technical specifications, construction
documents, and capital project management.
• Ability to communicate effectively and professionally in writing, orally, visually and in -person to a
wide range of clientele, including co-workers, park maintenance workers, contractors, public,
Boards and Commissions, and City Council.
• Familiarity with Federal, State, and City regulations and ordinances, particularly related to land use
planning, zoning, and capital project development.
• Knowledge of Washington State Planning laws and procedures, including Growth Management Act,
State Environmental Policy Act, Shoreline Management Act, and other laws related to capital project
development.
Last Reviewed.
Packet Pg. 257
7.14.a
3 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Park Planner & Capital Projects Manager
• General understanding of natural resource planning, landscape architecture, and engineering
principles related to grading, drainage, soil properties, erosion control and utilities.
• Knowledge of accessible design and Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines.
• Capital Improvement project planning, scheduling, implementation, and management.
• Contracts, project management principles, and complex bid specification requirements and
processing.
• Property acquisition practices and techniques.
• Principles and practices of governmental accounting including project budget management.
• City practices, standards, codes and procedures for design and construction projects.
• Building and landscape construction methods, techniques, materials, and equipment.
• State, federal, and local grant programs.
Required Skill in:
• Utilizing methods, equipment, and computer software in landscape architecture design and drafting,
and park planning and project management including the use of [AutoCAD; Microsoft Excel,
PowerPoint, and Word; Adobe InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop; Bluebeam; ArcGIS].
• Drafting and hand drawing to produce concept plans, renderings, and graphic rich materials.
• Ability to coordinate multiple projects and maintain complex files including governmental accounting
principles and practices for capital projects.
• Ability to work both independently and cooperatively with others.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors,
outside agencies, community groups and the general public.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's Degree in Landscape Architecture, Architecture, Urban Design, Park and Recreational Planning,
or related field and five (5) or more years of park design, or planning/management of capital facilities
improvement projects, with experience in construction contract administration. An equivalent combination of
education, training and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential
functions of the position may also be considered.
Licenses or Certifications:
• Landscape Architecture License, or equivalent license, is preferred.
• Valid State of Washington Driver's License. A driver's abstract is required and will be reviewed
according to the City's insurance requirements.
• A background check is required. Criminal history is not an automatic employment disqualifier. Results
are reviewed on a case -by case basis.
Last Reviewed.
Packet Pg. 258
7.14.a
4 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Park Planner & Capital Projects Manager
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment.
• Constant interruptions.
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Operating/using a computer keyboard and other office equipment.
• Sitting, standing, or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling, or crouching, reaching above shoulders, and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 20 lbs.
Hazards:
• Contact with dissatisfied or abusive individuals.
Incumbent Signature: Date:
Department Head: Date:
J
a
z
U.
L
d
i
C�
C
V
2
O
L
a
Q
M
U
L
d
r-
r-
R
a.
Y
L
a.
d
E
t
r
a
Last Reviewed.
Packet Pg. 259
7.15
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Lead Building Maintenance Operator Job Description
Staff Lead: Thom Sullivan
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Royce Napolitino
Background/History
The Lead Building Maintenance Operator position was approved in the 2020 City of Edmonds Budget.
The position remained unfilled through 2020 and 2021. The position was approved as an ongoing
expense in the City's 2020 budget (per decision package #55). This job description was advanced to the
Consent Agenda during the April 12, 2022 Public Safety and Personnel Committee Meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Consent to Accept Lead Building Maintenance Operator Job Description.
Narrative
The Public Works Facilities Manager is prepared to move forward to fill the position upon the approval
of the job description.
Attachments:
Lead Building Maintenance Operator redline ELW edits
Packet Pg. 260
7.15.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
Department: Public Works -Facilities Pay Grade: M
Bargaining Unit: Teamsters FLSA Status: Non -Exempt
Revised Date: 02/13/2020 Reports To: Facilities Manager
POSITION PURPOSE:
Under general direction, performs a variety of journey -level duties in the construction, maintenance and repair of
City buildings, facilities, and equipment; performs duties in a variety of building maintenance and construction trades
including carpentry, plumbing, roofing electrical, painting, masonry, and locksmith duties. Participates in the
scheduling, assigning, reviewing and performing of facilities maintenance and operations functions; trains and
provides work direction to assigned facilities staff; serves as supervisor in the absence of the Manager.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees
in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may
not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties.
• Coordinates and assigns daily work activities; coordinates schedules and tasks and verifies that tasks are
achieved.
• Meets regularly with staff to discuss and resolve daily priorities, workload, and technical issues; makes
effective suggestions and recommendations
• Inspects work performed to assure quality work products and effective use of resources and participates
in the performance evaluation process.
• Trains crews in equipment operation, street maintenance and repair, new procedures, and related
functions of the Division.
• Enforces safety regulations, procedures and practices including use of protective equipment.
• Coordinates with contractors and receives bids for various types of work and projects.
• Responds to emergencies and call -outs as required; maintains a variety of records and reports and
serves as supervisor in the absence of the Manager.
• Performs skilled maintenance, repair and renovation of City buildings, facilities, and equipment.
• Performs skilled duties in a variety of building maintenance and construction trades including carpentry,
plumbing, roofing, painting, masonry, locksmithing and other trades.
• Designs, constructs, repairs, and refinishes cabinets and woodwork.
• Performs carpentry duties: including construction of walls, footings, and forms.
• Repairs and replaces sheetrock and perform other general carpentry duties.
• Designs and drafts blueprints and working drawings for remodels, cabinets, sidewalks, stairs, and various
projects.
• Assists and coordinates with other departments for remodeling and space upgrades.
• Serves as crew leader for projects as directed.
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Revised: 04/06/2022
Packet Pg. 261
7.15.a
2 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
• Removes, repairs, and installs a variety of flooring including vinyl flooring, carpeting, ceramic tile, cove
base and linoleum.
• Repairs and maintains plumbing fixtures including toilets, sinks, showers, drains and hot water tanks;
installs new supply and waste lines and other related plumbing.
• Performs masonry duties including construction, repair, and replacement of a variety of roofing materials.
• Constructs and repairs concrete sidewalks, stairs, footings, and walls; builds forms, pours, and finishes
concrete.
• Performs minor electrical repairs and replacements including switches, motors, and pumps.
• Performs locksmithing duties; assists department heads and vendors to establish and secure a keying
system; maintains lock and key inventory.
• Performs other related duties within the scope of the classification.
Required Knowledge of:
• Standard tools, equipment, materials, methods, and techniques used in a variety of skilled building
maintenance duties and trades.
• Operation and proper maintenance of tools, equipment and machinery used in the building trades.
• Requirements of maintaining buildings, facilities, and equipment in good repair.
• Preventive maintenance principles and procedures.
• Applicable building codes, ordinances, fire regulations and safety precautions.
• Health and safety practices, regulations, and procedures.
• Record -keeping techniques.
• Various equipment and repair manuals, product labels and parts catalogs.
• Effective oral and written communication principles and practices.
• Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications
sufficient to perform assigned work.
• English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
• Lead work and training principles, methods, and techniques
Required Skill in:
• Participating in scheduling, assigning, reviewing, and performing of street and drainage maintenance
activities
• Performing a variety of skilled maintenance and repair tasks to City buildings, facilities, and equipment.
• Reading, interpreting, and applying applicable building codes, ordinances, and regulations.
• Operating a variety of equipment and tools including janitorial, painting, masonry, electrical, locksmith and
other equipment.
• Reading and interpreting schematics, blueprints, sketches, and diagrams.
• Estimating adequate amounts of time, labor, and materials needed for projects.
• Working from blueprints, shop drawings and sketches.
• Adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing quickly and accurately.
• Maintaining records related to work performed.
• Monitoring and practicing safe work practices.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other software relevant to assigned work.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships.
• Performing heavy physical labor.
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Revised: 04/06/2022
Packet Pg. 262
7.15.a
3 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
• Planning and organizing assigned work and meeting schedules and timelines.
• Interpreting and applying applicable federal, state, and local policies, laws, and regulations.
• Monitoring and practicing safe work practices.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside
agencies, community groups and the general public.
• Interpreting and administering policies and procedures sufficient to administer, discuss, resolve, and
explain them.
• Compiling, preparing, and maintaining a variety of records, files, and reports.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations.
• Leading, training, and delegating tasks and authority.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
High School Diploma or equivalent and five (5) years of increasingly responsible journey -level maintenance
experience in one or more of the building trades that includes at least one (1) year performing lead or supervisory
oversight of projects, programs and/or staff; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience
which allows the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
• Valid State of Washington Driver's License and a driving record acceptable to the City's insurance
requirements.
• Valid CPR, First Aid, AED, and Bloodborne Pathogen Cards.
• BOC Level I certification within a specified period of time after hire.
• Other specialty certifications/licenses as required by state and federal law and/or OSHA and WAC
regulations may be required within a specified period of time after hire.
• A background check is required. Criminal history is not an automatic employment disqualifier. Results are
reviewed on a case -by case basis.
• Subject to a pre -employment drug test following a conditional job offer.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Indoor and outdoor work environment.
• Driving a vehicle to conduct work.
Physical Abilities:
• Walking or otherwise moving over rough terrain.
• Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Revised: 04/06/2022
Packet Pg. 263
7.15.a
4 of 4
JOB DESCRIPTION
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
• Operating various equipment and tools.
• Reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, bending at the waist, gripping, kneeling or
crouching, stooping, crouching, reaching, pushing, pulling and twisting or otherwise positioning oneself to
accomplish tasks.
• Ascending/descending, ladders and inclines.
• Working at heights, working on a high ladder, and working in a confined space.
• Heavy physical labor including lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting 50-100 pounds.
• Reading and understanding printed and electronic messages and related materials.
• Hearing voice conversation and hearing alarms.
• Possessing close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night vision and color vision.
• Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy.
Hazards:
• Working around and with machinery having moving parts.
• Adverse weather conditions.
• Exposure to smoke, noxious odors, toxic fumes and chemicals, epoxy chemicals, poison oak or ivy, dust
or pollen, insect stings, solvents, oil and ink.
Signature:
Department Head:
Lead Building Maintenance Operator
Date:
Date:
Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Revised: 04/06/2022
Packet Pg. 264
7.16
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Resolution Extending Temporary Emergency Sick Leave Policy
Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson
Background/History
The federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act was passed by Congress on March 18,
2020. It includes two different employee leave acts. The Emergency Family and Medical Leave
Expansion Act provides paid and unpaid leave to employees who need to care for a minor child
due to a COVID-19-related school or child care closure. The Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act
provides paid leave to employees based on their own COVID-19 health related issues --
individuals who are caring for someone with COVID-19 issues, or who need to care for a minor
child due to a COVID-19-related school or child care closure.
The provisions of the laws had been implemented on or before April 2, 2020 and expired on
December 31, 2020. At this time, congress has not made any changes to extend the provisions of this
legislation. On August 3, 3021, the City Council approved a resolution, which extended the Emergency
Sick Leave benefits provided under the Policy through March 31, 2022.
This item was reviewed by the PSPP Committee on 4/12/22. The committee forwarded the item for
approval on consent to full Council.
Staff Recommendation
Approve a temporary extension of the Emergency Sick Leave provisions of the City's Families First
Corona Virus Response Act policy which will extend this benefit through February 28, 2023 and provide
an additional 80 hours of Emergency Sick Leave to eligible employees.
Narrative
The need for emergency sick leave continues due to cases related to the Coronavirus' Omicron variant
as well as other emerging variants, and the need to continue to have employees quarantine as a public
health measure. Appropriate sick leave to allow employees to quarantine when they or a family
member is exposed to CV19 and to isolate when they or a family member is diagnosed with CV19 is a
public health measure that directly impacts mitigating the spread of CV19. Continuing this policy is in
the public interest and in the best interest of the employees of the City and protecting continuity of
services of the City. As this is leave, it does not increase the 2022 or 2023 annual budget and would not
require a budget amendment.
Attachments:
Families First Coronavirus Response Act Policy 4839-2937-9512 (V.4)
Packet Pg. 265
7.16
Revised Resolution to Continue Emergency Sick Leave 4.7.2022
Packet Pg. 266
7.16.a
City of Edmonds
Families First Coronavirus Response Act Policy
This policy provides temporary protected leave and paid leave benefits for certain
absences arising from the COVID-19 outbreak in accordance with the federal Families
First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA). The benefits available under this policy are
available beginning on April 1, 2020. This policy will be administered in accordance
with the FFCRA statute and forthcoming federal regulations and guidance.
The FFCRA provides for two categories of leave. The first expands existing FMLA
coverage to provide up to 12 weeks of partially -paid Public Health Emergency Leave
("PHEL/FMLA") for eligible employees forced to miss work due to closure of their child's
school or the unavailability of the child's childcare provider for reasons related to x
COVID-19. The second provides up to 10 days of Emergency Sick Leave for various w
reasons related to the COVID-19 outbreak. Details regarding each category of leave 0
r
are provided in the sections below. o
W
Public Health Emergency Leave (PHEL/FMLA) W
Eligibility. Employees who have worked for the Employer for at least 30 calendar days
are eligible for PHEL/FMLA leave. An employee need not meet the eligibility
requirements for regular FMLA (12 months of employment and 1250 hours worked in
the prior year) to be eligible for PHEL/FMLA.
Leave Entitlement. An eligible employee may take up to 12 weeks of protected leave if
the employee is unable to work, or telework (See Telework Assessment at the end of
this policy), based on a need to care for the employee's child under age 18 because the
child's school or place of care has been closed, or the child's child care provider is
unavailable due to a public health emergency. A public health emergency means an
emergency with respect to COVID-19 declared by a federal, state, or local authority.
PHEL/FMLA may be taken intermittently only if approved by the Employer.
PHEL/FMLA is part of an employee's regular FMLA leave entitlement. Accordingly, if
an employee has already used FMLA for other purposes during the FMLA leave year,
the amount of available PHEL/FMLA will be reduced by the amount of FMLA leave
already taken. PHEL/FMLA leave will be available through December 31, 2020.
Pay Entitlement. The first 10 days of PHEL/FMLA will be unpaid, although employees
may elect to use accrued leave or Emergency Sick Leave during this period. For leave
beyond the first 10 days, the law requires that Employers pay two-thirds of the
employee's regular pay, up to a maximum of $200 per day or $10,000 in the aggregate
The City of Edmonds has chosen to pay this benefit at 100% and will not apply caps to
the benefit.
Pay is calculated based on the number of hours an employee would otherwise have
been scheduled to work. For employees with variable hours, hours will be determined
Pag
Packet Pg. 267
7.16.a
based on the average number of hours scheduled over the six-month period preceding
the leave (including paid leave hours) or on a reasonable expectation at the time of hire
as to the hours per day the employee would normally be scheduled to work.
Notification: Verification. Employees who need to take PHEL/FMLA leave should notify
Human Resources as soon as practicable after the need for leave arises. An employee
seeking PHEL/FMLA leave must submit documentation establishing a school closure or
unavailability of child care (which may include a post from a school district website,
email from a school or provider, etc.).
Other. This policy will be administered consistent with the City's existing Family and
Medical Leave (FMLA) policy, except as modified by the FFCRA.
Emergency Sick Leave
Eligibility. All employees of the City are eligible for up to 80 hours of Emergency Sick
Leave based on their work schedule. Emergency Sick Leave may be fully paid or
partially paid, depending on the reason for taking leave (see below).
Covered Reasons for Using Emergency Sick Leave: Employees are entitled to use
Emergency Sick Leave when they are unable to work, or telework (See Telework
Assessment at the end of this policy), for any of the following reasons:
The employee is subject to a federal, state, or local quarantine or isolation order
related to COVID-19. (Please note: the Department of Labor has updated the
advisement that a state or local "stay at home" or "shelter in place" order does
qualify under this reason. For the purposes of Emergency Sick Leave, a
quarantine or isolation order includes quarantine, isolation, containment, shelter -
in -place, or stay-at-home orders issued by any Federal, State, or local
government authority that cause the Employee to be unable to work even
though his or her Employer has work that the Employee could perform but for the
order.
2. The employee has been advised by a health care provider to self -quarantine due
to concerns related to COVID-19.
3. The employee is experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and is seeking a medical
diagnosis.
4. To care for an individual who is self -isolating for one of the reasons described in
(1) or (2) above. Per DOL regulations "individual" means an employee's
immediate family member, a person who regularly resides in the employee's
home, or a similar person with whom the employee has a relationship that
creates an expectation that the employee would care for the person if he or she
were quarantined or self -quarantined. For this purpose, "individual" does not
include persons with whom the employee has no personal relationship.
5. To care for the employee's child under age 18 due to closure of the child's school
or unavailability of the child's childcare provider due to COVID-19 precautions. A
"child" is defined the same as under the FMLA; i.e., a biological, adopted, or
foster child, a stepchild, a legal ward, or a child of a person standing in loco
Pag
Packet Pg. 268
7.16.a
parentis who is either under 18 years of age or is 18 years of age or older and
"incapable of self -care because of a mental or physical disability" at the time
leave is to commence.
6. The employee is experiencing any other substantially similar condition specified
by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the
Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Labor.
Paid Leave Entitlement. Full-time employees are entitled to up to 80 hours of
Emergency Sick Leave. Part-time employees are entitled to the Emergency Sick Leave
equal to number of hours they typically work over a two -week period. For employees
with variable hours, hours will be determined based on the average number of hours
scheduled over the six-month period preceding the leave (including paid leave hours) or
on a reasonable expectation at the time of hire as to the hours per day the employee
would normally be scheduled to work. Any Emergency Sick Leave available under this
policy is in addition to accrued leave to which an employee was already entitled under
existing City policies or labor agreements.
Pay Entitlement and Caps on Benefit: The law states that where leave is taken for
reasons (4), (5), and (6) listed above, the benefit may be limited to no less than two-
thirds the employee's regular rate of pay and where Emergency Sick Leave is taken for
reasons (1), (2), or (3) above (which cover leave due to the employee's own health or
quarantine), the paid sick leave benefit is equal to the employee's regular rate of pay.
The City has chosen to provide this benefit at 100% of the employee's regular rate of
pay for all reasons covered by this law. Accordingly, the City will not be applying the
daily and aggregate caps to this benefit.
Use of Paid Sick Leave; Sequencing with Other Leave; Intermittent Use. Employees
may access Emergency Sick Leave for a covered reason before exhausting other
accrued leaves. If an absence is covered by this Emergency Sick Leave policy and the
PHEL/FMLA policy above, the employee may elect to use Emergency Sick Leave
during the first 10 days of PHEL/FMLA in order to remain in paid status.
If an employee is using Emergency Sick Leave intermittently due to a closure of a
child's school or unavailability of the childcare provider, the employee may take leave
intermittently only with the City's approval. An employee may also use Emergency Sick
Leave intermittently with Employer approval if unable to telework his/her normal
schedule of hours due to a qualifying reason (for example, if an employee can telework
in the morning, but needs to care for a child in the afternoon due to a school closure).
Per Department of Labor guidance, where an employee is not teleworking, intermittent
use of Emergency Sick Leave is not permitted when leave is taken for reasons (1), (2),
(3), (4), or (6) above. In such cases, Emergency Sick Leave must be taken in full -day
increments and once leave is initiated for one of these reasons, the employee must
continue to use Emergency Sick Leave until either (i) the full amount of Emergency Sick
Leave has been used; or (ii) the employee no longer has a qualifying reason for taking
Emergency Sick Leave. The Department of Labor has explained that this requirement
is imposed because if an employee is actually or possibly sick with COVID-19, or is
caring for someone who is sick or possibly sick with COVID-19, the intent of the law is
to provide paid leave to prevent the spread of the virus.
Pag
Packet Pg. 269
7.16.a
Carryover; Termination of Benefit. The Emergency Sick Leave Benefit expires on
December 31, 2020; any unused Emergency Sick Leave will not be carried over to the
next calendar year or merged into other leave banks. Additionally, the entitlement to
Emergency Sick Leave ceases beginning with the employee's next scheduled work shift
immediately following the termination of the need for paid sick leave. However, to the
extent an employee subsequently needed additional time off for another covered reason
prior to December 31, 2020, the employee could use any remaining Emergency Sick
Leave available.
Notification. An employee who needs to take Emergency Sick Leave should notify
$
Human Resources as soon as practicable. After the first workday (or portion thereof)
E
that an employee takes Emergency Sick Leave, the employee must follow departmental
notice requirements required for continued use of regular sick leave.
Verification. An employee requesting Emergency Sick Leave must: specify the
qualifying reason for requesting leave; state that the employee is unable to work or
w
telework, for that specified reason; and provide the date(s) for which leave is requested.
o
The Department of Labor also requires that the City obtain documentation supporting
the leave request. Documentation may include, for example, a copy of the federal, state
M
or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19; written documentation from a
health care provider advising the individual to self -quarantine due to COVID-19; or
Nt
documentation from the employee's child's school or childcare provider of closure (such
>
as website posting or email).
r
Documentation for both Public Health Emeraencv Leave and Emeraencv Paid Sick
Leave. DOL regulations state that an employee seeking PHEL/FMLA or EPSL leave
must provide the employer with documentation containing: (i) the employee's name; (ii)
date(s) for which leave is requested; (iii) qualifying reason for the leave; and (iv) an oral
or written statement that the employee is unable to work due to the qualifying reason.
Depending on the type of leave being requested, DOL regulations require that an
employee provide the following additional information to substantiate the leave request:
o Where ESPL is requested due to a quarantine or isolation order, the name of the
government entity issuing the order;
o Where EPSL is requested due to the recommendation of a health care provider to
self -quarantine, the name of the health care provider making the recommendation; or
o For PHEL/FMLA leave or where EPSL is used to care for a child due to a school
closure or the unavailability of a childcare provider, the employee must also provide:
• name of the son or daughter being cared for;
• name of the school, place of care or childcare provider that has closed or become
unavailable; and
• a representation that no other suitable person will be caring for the child during the
period for which the employee is taking leave.
If the child needing care is older than 14 and the care is during daylight hours, a
Pag
Packet Pg. 270
7.16.a
statement that "special circumstances" exist requiring the employee to care for the child
is required.
Telework Assessment for both Public Health Emeraencv Leave and Emeraencv Paid
Sick Leave. According to DOL regulations, an employee is able to telework if: "(a) his or
a,
her Employer has work for the Employee; (b) the Employer permits the Employee to
work from the Employee's location; and (c) there are no extenuating circumstances
w
(such as serious COVID-19 symptoms) that prevent the Employee from performing that
work. Extenuating circumstances include the need to care for a child where the child's
a
school or place of daycare is closed and the child being at home precludes the
E
employee from effectively preforming work remotely. In such situations the ability of the
employee to work intermittently will be explored prior to any approval of a block of time
off. Telework may be performed during normal hours or at other times agreed by the
Employer and Employee."
x
w
c
0
0
N
N
Pag
Packet Pg. 271
7.16.b
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, TO CONTINUE THE EMERGENCY SICK LEAVE
BENEFITS OF THE CITY'S FAMILIES FIRST CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE
ACT POLICY THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2023 AND TO ADD 80 HOURS OF
SICK LEAVE TO EMPLOYEE LEAVE BANKS.
WHEREAS, the City enacted its Families First Coronavirus Response Act Policy (hereinafter
"Policy") on April 2, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act, upon which the Policy is based,
expired by its terms on December 31, 2020; and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution 1466, which extended the
Emergency Sick Leave benefits provided under the Policy through June 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution 1478, which extended the
Emergency Sick Leave benefits provided under the Policy through March 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, due to the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, and the need to continue to have
employees quarantine as a public health measure, the City Council has determined that it is in the
public interest to continue to provide City employees with the Emergency Sick Leave benefits
provided by the Policy, retroactive to April 1, 2022 and continuing through February 28, 2023,
unless the federal government enacts new legislation providing for such benefits before that date;
and
WHEREAS, because of the continuing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on City employees, and
to provide fair and equitable support to all employees, including those who cannot work from home,
the City Council has determined that it is in the public interest to provide an additional eighty (80)
hours of sick leave to the leave bank of each City employee to be used for COVID-19 related health
reasons; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Emergency Sick Leave provisions of the City's Families First Coronavirus
Response Act Policy, enacted on April 2, 2020, will continue in effect through February 28, 2023,
unless the federal government enacts new legislation providing for such benefits before that date.
The remainder of the Policy expired by its terms on December 31, 2020.
Section 2. The references to "December 31, 2020" in the "Carryover; Termination of Benefit"
section of the Emergency Sick Leave provisions of the Policy, which were previously extended to
June 30, 2021 and again to March 31, 2022, are hereby revised to read "February 28, 2023." In the
event the federal government enacts new legislation providing for emergency sick leave benefits
such as those provided for in the Policy, the remainder of the Policy will terminate as of the
0)
c
c
m
x
w
c
0
0
0
a�
Packet Pg. 272
7.16.b
effective date of the federal legislation. If no such new legislation is enacted on or before February
28, 2023, the Emergency Sick Leave provisions of the Policy shall expire on that date.
Section 3. An additional eighty (80) hours of sick leave will be added to the leave bank of each
eligible City employee. Hours will be pro -rated for part-time employees.within two (2) pay periods
of the date of this Resolution. This additional sick leave will be available to employees to use for
COVID-19 related health reasons only. It may be used to addresss an employee's own and/or their
family members' health needs. Any portion of this additional sick leave that is not used prior to
March 1, 2024 will be forfeited and removed from the employee's leave bank.
RESOLVED this day of 2022.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
0
c
c
as
x
w
c
0
0
0
d
Packet Pg. 273
7.17
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Procedure for Accepting Written Public comments
Staff Lead: Council and City Clerk
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
On March 29, 2022 Council passed a motion to adopt the recommendations of staff regarding
submission of written public comments (vote 5-0-1). Minutes attached.
Staff Recommendation
Approve web form and process as outlined below.
Narrative
Proposed Procedure for Accepting Written Public Comments:
1. A web form (attached) will be accessible on the City Council page on the city website.
2. Submissions will be forwarded to the council email account as well as compiled into a written
report.
3. This written report will be included as a separate agenda memo on the consent agenda, making
them a part of the permanent public record.
Attachments:
Pages from 2022-03-29 City Council - Full Minutes-3066
Webform for Online Public Comment - City of Edmonds, WA
Packet Pg. 274
7.17.a
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN,
TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, AND L. JOHNSON, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING
YES.
4. SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
City Clerk Scott Passey explained with the onset of the COVID pandemic in March 2020, the City
responded by conducting virtual public meetings using the Zoom meeting platform. Thinking this new
format might have a chilling effect on public participation, the council went the extra step of having staff
create a unique email account to allow the public to submit written comments to the council. The council
voted to append these written comments to the meeting minutes as a way of acknowledging the comments
on a regular basis. Since council resumed in -person meetings as of March 22, 2022, staff is requesting a
decision as to whether the council wishes to continue the practice of including written comments in its
weekly agenda packet. If the council wishes to continue this practice, staff recommends a couple changes
in the format and method of submission:
1. Eliminate the email address and create a web form on the council homepage to submit comments.
The form would be limited to a character -count equivalent to a 3-minute speech. Public comment
thus received would be forwarded to the council email account in real time as well as be compiled
into a written report for inclusion in the next available consent agenda.
2. Rather than appending the comments to the official minutes, comments would be included as a
separate agenda memo on the consent agenda, and the could acknowledge them by consent
agenda approval.
Councilmember Buckshnis supported having public comments attached to the packet somehow. She
asked why staff wanted to eliminate the email address. MT. Passey said the council office is required to do
a lot of formatting of emails before they are copied and pasted into the minutes. Creating a web form is a
text form and makes it easier to put into an agenda memo. His issue with including the comments in the
minutes is that meeting minutes by definition are a record of what happened or was said at a council
meeting. These written comments are not a record of what happened at a meeting, they are comments sent
to an email address. He recommended acknowledging them and including them as a separate item on the
consent agenda.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the reason public comments were added to the meeting minutes was
because people were not able to speak at the meeting so she believed they were part of the meeting
minutes. She understood the reason for a web form because it would remove the sender's email address.
She recalled at times the emails were included which some citizens complained about. She noted some
cities read written public comment into the meeting. She asked how the equivalent of a three minute
speech would be determined. Mr. Passey answered 3 minutes is approximately 450-550 words.
Councilmember Chen thanked Mr. Passey for working on this. He agreed it was important to include
written comments, noting they are just as important as people showing up to speak to the council
especially in a hybrid world. The email address is not as important as the commentors name and asked if
the commenter's name would be included. Mr. Passey answered staff can include any information council
wants. For example, a field could be added for the city of residence. Councilmember Chen said knowing
whether or not a commenter was an Edmonds resident would be value added. He was supportive of this
proposal.
Councilmember K. Johnson said limiting the number of words in public comments to the equivalent of
three minutes of speech occurred recently. Previously people would speak at the dais and submit
additional written comment. She found it overly restrictive to limit written comments to the equivalent of
three minutes and would not support that. Commenters should be allowed to submit what they want;
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 21
Packet Pg. 275
7.17.a
people are communicating with the council and may have charts or graphs that do not fit into the time
period. She did not support limiting public comments to a certain number of characters.
Council President Olson said this was not intended to be a temporary measure. Even though it was
initiated due to going to virtual meetings, some people appreciate having this access. She referred to an
email received today from someone who referenced a disability that made typing an option but phoning in
was not. People have expressed interest in keeping written comments as option that can be efficiently
managed, knowing the other methods still exist. The council has the option of reading public comment
into the record but it takes times out of the meeting to do that. Written comments are not actually
occurring during the meeting and including them as a separate item on the consent agenda is the cleanest
way to accommodate them.
Council President Olson continued, this was not limiting the communication the public can have with the
council; the distinction is what is public record that goes into the minutes. Sometimes information
submitted is very complicated and photos do not transfer in a digital world. She supported the
compromise proposed by Mr. Passey, reiterating it did not limit residents from providing information to
council via council email. This form would be the way the public could register public comment that
would end up in the public record. Once the process is finalized, it will be communicated to the public.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO
ADOPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS AS INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA PACKET FOR MARCH 29,
2022.
Councilmember Tibbott asked if a resolution or ordinance was needed. Mr. Passey answered a motion
would suffice. Councilmember Tibbott was in favor of having the city of residency and limiting the
message to approximately a three minutes speech. He was also interested in delineating that comments
were related to a particular agenda item. For example, he wanted to know the difference between a
general email and a comment about a particular item on the agenda. He asked if there was a way to
include that in the web form. Mr. Passey said the council assistant would need to monitor that.
Councilmember Tibbott suggested a check box on the web form to include it as public comment. Mr.
Passey offered to work with GIS Analysis Dave Rohde regarding possibilities.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if the practice of allowing both verbal and written comments would
continue even if they were duplicated. Mr. Passey answered yes.
Council President Olson said the form on the web page would include directions that input on that form
will be emailed to council as well as included in the public record that will be in the agenda packet. Mr.
Passey added the minutes and the packet are permanent and essential records of the council. Regardless of
whether the comments are in the minutes or the packet, they are a permanent and essential record forever.
Councilmember Tibbott said it was important for the public to understand when they submit a public
comment that it was part of a permanent and enduring public record. That was one more reason to limit it
to approximately a three minute speech. He wanted to know the email he received was a public comment
versus just a general email. Mr. Passey suggested determining a way to indicate if a comment was related
to an agenda item or City business. Councilmember Tibbott commented it was important for him to know
that distinction.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Tibbott, councilmembers get a lot of email, in 2
hours she received 30 emails, and not all of them are all public comments. The only way she knows
something is a public comment is it is addressed to the public comment email. Mr. Passey agreed there
are general comments and comments specific to agenda items or upcoming items.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 22
Packet Pg. 276
7.17.a
Councilmember Chen commented some people are good at stating a request in the body of email to
include the email in public comments; doing that is very helpful. Mr. Passey offered to make the web
form very clear with regard to what happens with that record.
Council President Olson was curious why councilmembers wanted to know whether a comment was a
public record. She could understand why the administrative team needed to know because they were the
ones culling the report that would end up on the consent agenda, but councilmembers can receive
significant information from both public comments and regular email. For a councilmember, she did not
see why it would make a difference or why staff would need to indicate it was one or the other.
With regard to why it was important, Councilmember Tibbott suggested the council not receive public
comments until they are in the packet because often when people stand at the podium or provide an email,
it is in response to a particular agenda item and he would like to have an understanding regarding why
they are providing that information.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1) COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON ABSTAINING.
9. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
1. OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson commented for those who have not had a chance to visit the city council/court/public
safety building, there is a patrol car in front with a canopy over it completely covered with flowers and
gifts from the community. The police department has been inundated with baked goods and support from
the community. That goes a long way for them at a time when they still have to suit up and go out. Some
are grieving now and unable to work and the department is getting support from other agencies to assist
while the department deals with the loss of Officer Tyler Steffins. He thanked the community for their
support, relaying the importance of that support for the Edmonds Police Department.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember L. Johnson expressed her deepest condolences to the family of Officer Tyler Steffins and
to his Edmonds Police Department family. He will be missed.
Councilmember Tibbott said when he received word of the loss of one of the City's officers, he felt numb,
sad, and angry and he could not imagine what was going through the minds and hearts of the police
department. This is such a regretful situation and the community wants to find ways to support the family
and the Edmonds Police Department during this deep time of sadness.
Councilmember Tibbott announced he has appointed Jay Hogue to the Economic Development
Commission for a term that renews next month.
Council President Olson thanked the council, staff and Mayor Nelson for supporting this special meeting
to address time critical issues. This was the second special meeting today and there will likely be another
on Thursday to support benefits for Officer Steffins' family. Fifth Tuesdays are typically a week off, but
instead electeds and staff are here in service. She recognized that sacrifice and thanked all for their
commitment to the City.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 23
Packet Pg. 277
4/14/22, 1:11 PM Online Public Comment - City of Edmonds, WA 7.17.b
ONLINE PUBLIC COMMENT
One comment per meeting or hearing per person. When more than one submission is received,
the last complete entry will be used.
Public comments go to all councilmember emails and are included in the next regular meeting
agenda packet, making them part of the permanent public record and acknowledged via the
consent agenda approval process.
If you prefer communicating with Council without making a public comment, please use the
council@edmondswa.govemail address instead.
ONLINE FORM
First Name:(*)
Last Name:(*)
C
City of Residence:(*)
Agenda Topic:(*)
Comments:(*)
https://www.edmondswa.gov/cros/One.aspx?portalld=16495016&pageld=l8451526 1 Packet Pg. 278
4/14/22, 1:11 PM Online Public Comment - City of Edmonds, WA 7.17.b
Security Measure
I'm not a robot
reCAPTCHA
Privacy - Terms
Submit
https://www.edmondswa.gov/cros/One.aspx?portalld=16495016&pageld=18451526 I Packet Pg. 279
7.18
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
WWTP Program Administrator
Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
The Program Administrator position has been providing administrative support functions at the
Treatment Plant and has contributed to the smooth operational flow of work, through the pandemic
and currently as we work through the significant staff shortage at the WWTP. Since its inception on
August 1, 2019 this position has been filled under a twelve-month Personal Service Contract.
This is a request to convert the Program Administrator from a contracted position to a Limited Term
Employee (LTE) for a two (2) year period with an automatic one year extension if the carbon recovery
project is still going on.
Additionally, we propose to place the Program Administrator on the NR-36 range of the revised Non -
Represented Salary Schedule. This is the equivalent range to the NR-13 that the original contracted
wages were based on. The position's revised Job Description is attached and in need of approval.
NR-36
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7
92,378.78 96,996.05 101,846.77 106,938.43 112,284.67 117,900.39 123,795.54
The intention is to provide step 5 to the existing contracted employee beginning May 1, 2022 which
includes a 6% Salary increase and the 3% 2022 COLA. The employee would then be eligible for step
increases per City Policy.
The total (approx.) amount needed to fully fund the requested LTE position through 2022 is $149,081.73
(including $38,650.82 in estimated benefits) however a budget increase is not needed at this time. The
proposal is to fund the position from salary savings. The City would be responsible for approximately
49% of the total expense with the Treatment Plant Partners being responsible for the balance.
On April 12, 2022, staff presented this item to the Public Safety, Personnel and Planning Committee and
it was placed on the April 19, 2022 consent agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the change of the Program Administrator from a contract position to a two (2) year Limited
Term Employee position.
Packet Pg. 280
7.18
Narrative
The Program Administrator position has been providing administrative support functions at the
Treatment Plant and has contributed to the smooth operational flow of work, through the pandemic
and currently as we work through the significant staff shortage at the WWTP. Since its inception on
August 1, 2019 this position has been filled under a twelve-month Personal Service Contract. The
contract was designed to roll over if not officially ended by December 2021. The position was proposed
to be added in the 2021 and 2022 annual budget but was omitted without explanation. We are
requesting this position be converted to a Limited Term Employee (LTE) and be placed at salary range
NR-36 in order to allow the new PW Director an opportunity to evaluate the ongoing need. As part of
the effort to keep operations and maintenance of the plant on track during the upcoming construction
work and beyond, it is necessary the WWTP have the needed support and expertise of the Program
Administrator.
Our Partners, in the following manner, would share the expense:
Mountlake Terrace
26%
38,761.25
Olympic View Water/Sewer
17%
$25,343.89
Ronald Sewer District
8%
$11,926.54
Edmonds
49%
$73,050.05
TOTAL
100%
$149,081.73
Attachments:
WWTP Program Administrator_elw accepted
Packet Pg. 281
7.18.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Department: Public Works — Wastewater Treatment Pay Grade
Bargaining Unit: Non -Represented
Revised Date: 4/6/2022
POSITION PURPOSE:
FLSA Status:
Reports To:
OV e 4fo
a
N R-36
Exempt
WWTP Manager
Under general direction, plans, organizes and coordinates programs in support of the City's Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Is responsible for implementing the WWTP's safety program and nurturing a
culture of safety first; responsible for development and implementation of policies and procedure designed to
improve efficiency of operation and promote fiscal responsibility. Additional responsibilities include oversight of
the pretreatment program, plant asset management program utilizing the established records management
system and assisting with the development and management of capital projects. Assists Manager in
preparation and monitoring of the annual operating budget and Capital Improvement Program and when
assigned, performs the duties of the WWTP Manager.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional,
position -specific duties.
• Plan, organize, and coordinate a variety of programs, projects and activities to the operation and
maintenance of the City's wastewater treatment plant.
• Oversee the maintenance management system and asset management program.
• Act as management lead on the WWTP safety committee.
• During periods of absence assumes Management Roles and responsibilities.
• Prepare and maintain a variety of reports, records and files related to assigned activities.
• Provide input to Manager for the O&M budget process, recommend and plan capital projects, control and
authorize expenditures in accordance with established limitations.
• Administer Capital Improvement projects, make recommendations to Manager, may prepare, advertise,
receive and recommend award bids according to established procedures and oversee projects.
• Communicate with personnel and outside organizations to coordinate activities and programs, resolve
issues and conflicts and exchange information.
• Provide technical expertise, information, and assistance to the Manager regarding assigned functions,
assist as needed in the formulation and development of policies, procedures, and programs.
• Operate a computer and other office equipment as assigned, maintain current knowledge of plant
instrumentation and control systems, drive a vehicle to various sites to inspect work.
• Attend and conduct a variety of meetings as assigned, represent the City at a variety of meetings.
• Performs other related duties within the scope of the classification.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator Last Reviewed-
Last Rev Packet Pg. 282
7.18.a
2 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
Required Knowledge of:
• Maintenance and asset management industry standards.
• Industry standards related to the operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants.
• Effective and efficient maintenance of wastewater plant assets.
• Permit requirements.
• Applicable laws, codes, regulations, policies, and procedures related to the operation and maintenance of
wastewater treatment plants.
• Conflict resolution techniques.
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience, and courtesy.
• Health and safety standards, rules, and regulations.
• Budget preparation and control.
• Labor Relations and contract administration.
• Oral and written communication skills.
• Record keeping techniques.
• Operation of a computer and assigned software.
• Supervisory and training principles, methods, and techniques.
Required Skill in:
• Planning, organizing and coordinating the operations and maintenance activities of a municipal
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
• Ensure requirements and permits comply with local, state, and federal agencies.
• Supervise and evaluate the performance of assigned staff.
• Evaluating work practices of operations, maintenance, and laboratory departments to implement current
industry standards.
• Plan plant projects to allocate staffing, timelines, and budget.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing.
• Interpret, apply, and explain rules, regulation, policies, and procedures.
• Establishing and maintaining cooperative and effective working relationships with others.
• Operate a computer and assigned office equipment.
• Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
• Meet schedules and timelines.
• Work independently with little direction.
• Plan and organize work.
• Preparing and maintaining a variety of comprehensive records, files, and reports.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, or related field and five years of
experience managing and implementing programs or policies developed by others including two years of staff
supervisory responsibility; preferably in a municipal or public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination
of education, training and experience which allows the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions
of the position.
Cl
0
r
R
M
.E
E
Q
E
a�
0
L
:2
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Rev'
Packet Pg. 283
7.18.a
3 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
Required Licenses or Certifications:
• Valid State of Washington Driver's License and a driving record acceptable to the City's insurance
requirements.
• CPR and First Aid card, within 6 months of hire
• A background check is required. Criminal history is not an automatic employment disqualifier. Results are
reviewed on a case -by case basis.
• Subject to a pre -employment drug test following a conditional job offer.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Indoor/outdoor work environment
• Driving a vehicle to conduct work
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Operate a variety of grounds equipment and power and hand tools.
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Read a variety of materials and possess close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night
vision and color vision.
• Ascending/descending ladders
• Lifting/ carrying or otherwise move or transport heavy objects frequently up to 50lbs.
• Sitting/standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time
• Walking or otherwise moving over rough or uneven surfaces while performing inspections and
investigations.
• Performing repetitive motions, including balancing, stooping, kneeling, bending, crouching, crawling,
reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, and standing, pushing, pulling, and using
stairs.
• Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy.
Hazards:
• Exposure to chemicals, used in Wastewater treatment such as Sodium Hypochlorite, Caustic Soda,
Bisulfate, Polymers, Clay, Lime and Carbon.
• Exposure to raw and treated sewage, odors associated with sewage treatment, high heat and moving
equipment.
• Exposure to cleaning chemicals, herbicides, and dust.
• Working at heights using ladders and structures
• Working around and with sometimes noisy machinery having moving parts
• Exposure to slippery surfaces, damp spaces while cleaning in and around equipment.
• Exposure to electrical power supply and high voltage.
Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Last Reviewed: 04/06/2022
Last Rev'
Packet Pg. 284
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Resolution to adopt findings in support of the BD2 moratorium
Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Michael Clugston
Background/History
<Type or insert Info here>
Staff Recommendation
If the city council finds that the attached resolution accurately describes its justifications for imposing a
moratorium in portions of the 13132 zone, then a motion to adopt the attached resolution would be the
recommended course of action. If the city council finds that the attached resolution needs to be
amended in order to fully capture the justifications for imposing the moratorium, then it would be
appropriate to first move the resolution and then move to amend the resolution. The city attorney
should be consulted with regard to any proposed amendments to the resolution.
Narrative
The first paragraph of RCW 36.70A.390 reads as follows:
A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning
ordinance, or interim official control without holding a public hearing on the proposed
moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold
a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or
interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or not the governing
body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department.
If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing,
then the governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium,
interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this
section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year
if a work plan is developed for related studies providing for such a longer period. A moratorium,
interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control may be renewed for
one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are
made prior to each renewal.
RCW 36.70A.390 (emphasis added). It has been suggested that the phrase "immediately after" in the
above statute renders these findings untimely and that these findings needed to be adopted during the
April 5, 2022 city council meeting to comply with the statutory language above. While we appreciate
how some could draw that conclusion from an ordinary reading of the phrase "immediately after," for
the reasons stated below, we respectfully disagree.
Packet Pg. 285
8.1
Washington courts "have had occasion to construe the meaning of the word 'immediately' in various
kinds of written instruments, including insurance policies, and have held that it does not necessarily
mean 'upon the instant,' 'forthwith,' or 'without any intervening lapse of time/ but that there is a
certain latitude to be given the significance of the word, and that it may mean 'proximately,' 'directly,'
'close to,' 'within a reasonable time."' Foley v. New World Life Ins. Co., 185 Wash. 89, 94, 52 P.2d 1264,
1266 (1936)(emphasis added). In the context of adopting findings to justify a moratorium, we believe
the adoption of findings at the next regular meeting after the public hearing on the moratorium would
satisfy the statutory timing requirement because "immediately after" can mean "within a reasonable
time," and this context provides a reason for waiting until the next regular meeting after the public
hearing to adopt findings. Lest anyone think that this analysis is merely attempting to rationalize a
timing oversight by staff or the city attorney, we would note that the ordinance that initially adopted
the moratorium (Ordinance 4247) expressly contemplated this timing for the adoption of findings.
Section 4 of Ordinance 4247 reads:
Pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing
on a moratorium within sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on
April 5, 2022 unless the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a
different hearing date. No later than the next regular city council meeting immediately
following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this
moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or cancel the moratorium.
Ordinance 4247, Section 4 (emphasis added). Clearly, this timing for the adoption of findings was
intended.
Below are several questions that have been raised or could be raised concerning this agenda item, along
with responses drafted by the city attorney.
What reasons might exist to wait until the next regular meeting after the hearing to adopt such
findings? Presumably, the legislature requires a public hearing so that the city council hears from the
public as to whether the moratorium was a good idea worthy of remaining in effect, whether the
moratorium was a bad idea that should be terminated, or whether it might have been a good idea, but
one that has served its purpose. It is clear from the statute that the purpose of the findings is to justify
the council action, whether that action has already been taken or whether it is one that will be taken. In
other words, the findings explain why. While the council might have had its reasons for taking the initial
action, it doesn't necessarily follow that those reasons were fully understood or articulated at the time
of the council action. The hearing provides an opportunity to fully understand the need for the action,
and, in many cases, the continuing need. Keep in mind that the statute contemplates an initial
moratorium period of up to six months and a hearing that must take place within 60 days. That means
that, at the time of the hearing, the term of the moratorium would still have at least another four
months. So, public testimony at the hearing can greatly supplement the city council's initial reasons for
the moratorium and can inform the council's decision as to whether to allow the moratorium to run its
course, terminate it early, or, as happened here, extend it. By adopting the findings after the hearing,
they can be more complete and can better explain and justify, not only the initial council action, but also
the subsequent actions or inactions (e.g., letting it remain in effect).
Could the city council have adopted its findings earlier? Yes, the council could have done so earlier. In
the future, the city attorney could include a section in every moratorium or interim zoning ordinance
that states: "the above whereas clauses are hereby adopted as findings justifying this ordinance." If that
were done, no findings resolution would be needed. Ordinance 4247 did, in fact, contain whereas
clauses that could have qualified as findings. So, a section worded that way would have satisfied the
Packet Pg. 286
8.1
technical requirement of the statute to adopt findings. Frankly, this approach would have been more
efficient. But would it have been a better outcome for the public? The whereas clauses in Ordinance
4247 do not explain the council's action as comprehensively as the attached resolution does. If the goal
is to understand the bases for the council's action, we believe an adoption of findings prior to the
hearing or even on the day of the hearing would run counter to that goal. Where, by contrast, a later
adoption of findings allows the city council to be in something like a conversation with the public: first,
the council takes action; second, the public comments on council's action; and third, the council adopts
findings that explain its action while also having the opportunity to address in its reasoning issues that
the public may have raised. Hence, we maintain that the best findings are those that are drafted after
the public hearing and take the public hearing testimony into account. Having said that, if the council
would like to change the timing of the findings in the future, we would welcome that direction.
Does it matter whether the city council expressly calls for findings to be drafted? No. We don't think it
matters whether the council has directed the city attorney to draft findings. What matters is that the
council adopts findings in a timely manner and that the findings reflect the council's reasoning. The
drafting could happen at the council's direction, at the council president's direction, at staff's direction,
or upon the city attorney's own initiative. The effect would be the same under any of those scenarios. If
the draft findings don't reflect the council's beliefs about its justification, then they would need to be
amended by the council, but likelihood of that needing to happen isn't increased or decreased by
whether the council directing that the findings be drafted. So, we see the call for findings as a non -issue.
And we know of no legal authority stating that a city council can only adopt findings when those findings
were expressly called for in a prior meeting.
Was it improper to hold the public hearing on April 5, 2022 without draft findings being included in
the packet for that meeting? No. As noted above, if directed, we could provide draft findings in advance
of the public hearing. But, even if we did that, keep in mind that the subject of the hearing wouldn't be
the draft findings. Rather, the subject of the hearing is the moratorium itself. And the public has had
plenty of time to review the moratorium and formulate comments as to whether it is a good thing or a
bad thing. Draft findings are not a condition precedent to public's being able to comment on whether
they agree or disagree with the moratorium.
Does the city council need to adopt a second findings resolutions because it adopted both an
ordinance to impose a moratorium (Ord. 4247) and a second ordinance to extend that moratorium by
six days (Ord. 4253)? No. The action being justified here is a two-part action: the adoption of Ordinance
4247 and the adoption of Ordinance 4253. We don't see any reason why one resolution could not adopt
findings to justify both ordinances so long as both ordinances find justification in the adopted findings.
Furthermore, we don't read state law to require such a process. Process does not exist for the sake of
process. Here, the process exists to ensure that cities aren't arbitrarily imposing moratoria. So, the
legislature makes cities articulate their reasons for imposing a moratorium. In this case, the reasons for
the initial moratorium are so closely intertwined with the reasons for the six -day extension, that it
seems unnecessarily formalistic to have two separate sets of findings (two resolutions), one to justify
each ordinance. Nothing prevents the city from adopting two separate sets of findings. But, in our
opinion, it would be wasteful and redundant without any clear public benefit.
Does the city council need to hold a second public hearing on Ordinance 4253? No. Reading RCW
36.70A.390 in its entirety, we read the phrase "without holding a public hearing" to mean "without first
holding a public hearing". Because the hearing on Ordinance 4247 took place prior to the adoption of
Ordinance 4253, and because Ordinance 4253 merely extends the effective date of Ordinance 4247 by
six days, the city shouldn't need another public hearing within 60 days of adoption of 4253. In other
words, the adoption of Ordinance 4253 does not meet the condition ("without holding a public
hearing") that requires a public hearing to be held within 60 days of adoption.
Was the city council required to adopt findings prior to extending the two -month moratorium by six
Packet Pg. 287
8.1
days? The above statute contains this sentence: "A moratorium ... may be renewed for one or more six-
month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each
renewal." We think it is reasonable to interpret the requirement in this sentence to only apply when
renewing or extending a moratorium beyond six months from its initial adoption. Because moratoria are
a deviation from normal land use processes, there's an implicit understanding in the statute that these
should only be imposed for short periods of time, as necessary, and that anything beyond six -months
requires another round of public hearing / adoption of findings to justify a term beyond six months. But
it does not follow that an extension of an initial moratorium where the total term is still less than six
months would be subject to the procedural requirements of this sentence. The statute clearly
contemplates that findings can be retrospective except when renewing a moratorium for another six
month period. The statute does not expressly address our situation where we have a two -month
moratorium that was extended by six days. But given the authority provided here to have a six-month
moratorium based upon one public hearing / adoption of findings, it seems reasonable to read the city's
two -month and six -days moratorium as falling within the six-month authority provided by the statute,
even where two ordinance where adopted to create that term. In other words, we don't see any public
policy that would be served by reading this sentence to require a public hearing / adoption of findings
prior to every extension, even where the total extended moratorium term is still well less than six
months. The statute says "may be effective for not longer than six months". Ordinance 4253 says "The
moratorium imposed by Ordinance 4247 is hereby extended to remain in effect through April 21, 2022."
So, in our opinion, the city is still acting within the authority provided for an initial six-month
moratorium.
Attachments:
Resolution on BD2 moratorium findings
Ordinance 4247
Ordinance 4253
Packet Pg. 288
8.1.a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT THE
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES 4247 AND 4253, WHICH IMPOSED AND
EXTENDED A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN
APPLICATIONS IN THE BD2 ZONE.
WHEREAS, the city council on February 15, 2022 imposed a moratorium on certain applications in
the BD2 zone through the adoption of Ordinance 4247 pursuant to authority granted by RCW
36.70A.390; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 requires cities that adopt a moratorium without holding first a public
hearing to hold a public hearing within sixty days of adoption; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 goes on to state: "If the governing body does not adopt findings of
fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the governing body shall do so immediately after
this public hearing;" and
WHEREAS, Washington courts "have had occasion to construe the meaning of the word
`immediately' in various kinds of written instruments, including insurance policies, and have held
that it does not necessarily mean `upon the instant,' `forthwith,' or `without any intervening lapse of
time,' but that there is a certain latitude to be given the significance of the word, and that it may
mean `proximately,' `directly,' `close to,' `within a reasonable time."' Foley P. New Vorld Life Ins. Co.,
185 Wash. 89, 94, 52 P.2d 1264, 1266 (1936); and
WHEREAS, Section 4 of Ordinance 4247 states that "[n]o later than the next regular city council
meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the
subject of this moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or cancel the moratorium;"
and
WHEREAS, the statute, by allowing the adoption of findings to be deferred until after the public
hearing, appears to contemplate that the findings would actually take that public testimony into
account; and
WHEREAS, any findings drafted prior to the public hearing would necessarily not be able to reflect
public testimony that is offered after that drafting; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that it is more respectful of the public's testimony and more in
keeping with the purpose of the statute to have findings drafted after the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on Ordinance 4247 on April5, 2022 to determine
whether the moratorium adopted by that ordinance was justified and should continue or be allowed
to expire; and
Packet Pg. 289
8.1.a
WHEREAS, several people spoke at the above -referenced public hearing, expressing the view that
the staff proposed interim design regulations did not fully address the public's concern with the
current state of the BD2 regulations and that, consequently, the moratorium should be extended;
and
WHEREAS, some of the comments questioned whether the city council had ever intended to allow
multi -family structures without any commercial space in the BD2 zone and requested that the
council take some action to address that through its interim regulations; and
WHEREAS, other commenters asserted that the BD2 zone, in fact, currently does not allow multi-
family structures without any commercial space; and
WHEREAS, the city attorney recommends interpreting that later category of comments as similar to
those that questioned whether the effect of certain past BD2 amendments was understood (after all,
no moratorium would be necessary if multi -family structures without any commercial space were
illegal because such projects would simply be denied);
WHEREAS, after the public hearing, these concerns about the council's past intent, particularly with
regard to Ordinances 3865 and 3955, caused the city council to adopt Ordinance 4253, which
extended the moratorium through April 21, 2022, thereby giving the city council additional time to
better understand the history of the BD2 zone and whether the effect of certain prior amendments
was understood by past city councils at the time or whether certain effects might have been
unintended or not well understood; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS. The city council hereby adopts as its findings of fact to
support the adoption of Ordinance 4247 and its extension through Ordinance 4253 the Whereas
clauses contained in this Resolution and also in Ordinances 4247 and 4253.
RESOLVED this day of )2022.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 290
8.1.a
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
Packet Pg. 291
8.1.b
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.4247
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON
THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR
BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT, TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF EDMONDS
ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SUCH
BD2 ZONED LOTS, SETTING TWO MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE
PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM, AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code identifies certain portions of
certain streets in the Downtown Business (BD) zones as designated street fronts; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ECDC 16.43.030.B.2, Map 16.43-1 shows the streets that define
the designated street front for all properties lying within the BD zones; and
WHEREAS, the development regulations in the Downtown Business (BD) zones can
vary depending upon whether the subject property fronts on a designed street front; and
WHEREAS, there is concern that the existing development regulations in the BD2 zone
may not regulate proposed development in a manner that would produce development projects
that reflect community values; and
WHEREAS, this concern can be addressed, initially, through the adoption of interim
zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, city staff should be able to draft interim zoning regulations to address this
concern within about a month; and
WHEREAS, those interim zoning regulations would then be presented to the city council
for consideration and adoption; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 authorizes the city council to adopt an immediate
moratorium for a period of up to six months without holding a public hearing on the proposal
provided that a public hearing is held within at least sixty days of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the city council desires to impose a two -month moratorium on the
acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the BD2 zone that does not front
on a designated street front; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Packet Pg. 292
8.1.b
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this moratorium is to allow the City adequate
time to draft interim zoning regulations for the BD2 zone that would change the required setback
for properties that do not front on a designated street front. For the purposes of this ordinance,
the phrase "designated street front' shall be the portions of the downtown streets defined in
ECDC 16.43.030.B.2 and shown on Map 16.43-1.
Section 2. Moratorium Imposed. The city council hereby imposes a two -month
moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the BD2 zone
that does not front on a designated street front, PROVIDED THAT the moratorium shall not
apply to building permit applications for projects that are categorically exempt from SEPA
review.
Section 3. Duration of Moratorium. The moratorium imposed by this ordinance shall
commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on
the moratorium and adopts findings and conclusions in support of the moratorium (as
contemplated by Section 4 herein), the moratorium shall not terminate until two (2) months after
the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner.
Section 4. Public Hearing on Moratorium. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW
35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on a moratorium within sixty (60) days
of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on April 5, 2022 unless the city council, by
subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later than the next
regular city council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt
findings of fact on the subject of this moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or
cancel the moratorium.
Packet Pg. 293
8.1.b
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Declaration of Emergency. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the city council, is not subject to referendum. Because it is not subject to
referendum, RCW 35A.12.130 applies. Pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, this ordinance shall take
effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the
city council. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this
ordinance take immediate effect. Without an immediate moratorium on the city's acceptance of
the building permit applications described herein, such applications could become vested,
leading to the development of property that is not consistent with the city's values and vision for
the BD2 zone. Therefore, the moratorium must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect
the public health, safety, and welfare, and to prevent the submission of building permit
applications to the city in an attempt to vest rights. This ordinance does not affect any existing
vested rights.
Section 7. Publication. This ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance is not subject to referendum and shall take
effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it
is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW
35A.12.130. If it is only approved by a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after
passage and publication.
Packet Pg. 294
APPROVED:
MAyok MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
5:�710� ,
T LER ,SCOTT EY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADANN
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: February 15, 2022
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: February 15, 2022
PUBLISHED: February 18, 2022
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 15, 2022
ORDINANCE NO. 4247
Packet Pg. 295
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4247
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 15t' day of February, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance
No. 4247. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE
EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH
A BD2 LOT THAT DOES NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF
EDMONDS ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS FOR SUCH BD2 ZONED LOTS, SETTING
TWO MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE
MORATORIUM, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 15t' day of February, 2022.
'5:
CL K, SC❑ SSEY
1
Packet Pg. 296
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington }
County of Snohomish } ss
Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH948914 ORDINANCE
SUMMARY as it was published in the regular
and entire issue of said paper and not as a
supplement form thereof for a period of 1
issue(s), such publication commencing on
02/18/2022 and ending on 02/18/2022 and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period.
The amount ' the fee for s h publication is
$65.36.
Subscribed and sworn iaefo me on this
r day of
Z�
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
City of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416
SCOTTPASSEY
Linda PnilllPs
Notary Public
State of Washington
My APPOinlment £xplres 512912a25
QDMMISSIOn Number s477
Packet Pg. 297
Classified Proof
8.1.b
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
of 1he CIty IN Edrnn . N'aSNlrglon
On the 15Lh day of February, 2a22. the C'AY Ccurlcll of the Cky Of
Edimma, paaeeC the Totlowlrg Or®nanCa0. the aummades of eatd
bNlnancas [nnslsling M Ulfes are prwlded ae follows:
ORDINANCE NO 5
AN ORDINANCE OF fF E�CI11 157 EDMONOS. WASHINGTON,
AMEN03NO CHAPTER 1.20 ECC, ENTITLED 'PUBLIC
RECORDS REOUESTS; TO AUGN WITH T14E
REORGANIZATION OF TKE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
ORDINO 42-0fi
AN ORDINANCE OF TH NANCE O EDM SNDS, WASHINGTON.
AUTHORIZING ALLOCATION OF AMEWCAN RESCUE PLAN
ACT PREMIUM PA To THE PURPOSE CIOF EMPLOYEESDING OVID
AND
AND
AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL VACATION DAYS FOR SUCH
EMPLOYEES
OR DINANr E NO. 4 47
AN ORDINANCE OESTABLISHINGNF IMMEDIATE EMERHE CITY OF GENC1f MORA1TORAUM
ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA-IONS
FOR 802 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A
0ESMNA17EO STREET FRONT, TO BE IN EFFBCT UNTIL THE
CM OF EDMONDS ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS FOR SUCH B02 ZONED LOTS, SETTING TWO
MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM,
AND DECLARING EMERGENCY N . 4248
AN ORDINANCE OF O DS: WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 5.a4 ECC (PERSONS. CRIMES
RELATING TO)TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE RCW 7.94.120 AND
RCW 7.105A61)'. PROVIDING FOR SEVE113ABILITY; DECLARING
AN EMERGELNCY AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
The 1uO tall of Ihesa Ordrkancaa will b9 sent upon [&quasi.
DATED INs 151h DaY of FebrUa ry, 2022.
CITY CLERK. SCO PASSEY
PubLshod: FulOMMY 1 % 2=2 EDH948914
Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 02/18/2022 08:49:25 am Page: 2
Packet Pg. 298
8.1.c
ORDINANCE NO.4253
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT
DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS
IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code identifies certain portions of
certain streets in the Downtown Business (BD) zones as designated street fronts; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ECDC 16.43.030.B.2, Map 16.43-1 shows the streets that define
the designated street front for all properties lying within the BD zones; and
WHEREAS, the development regulations in the Downtown Business (BD) zones can
vary depending upon whether the subject property fronts on a designed street front; and
WHEREAS, there is concern that the existing development regulations in the BD2 zone
may not regulate proposed development in a manner that would produce development projects
that reflect community values or that was intended by the previous city councils; and
WHEREAS, this concern can be addressed, initially, through the adoption of interim
zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, city staff has drafted interim zoning regulations to address this concern; and
WHEREAS, those interim zoning regulations have been presented to the city council for
consideration; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 authorizes the city council to adopt an immediate
moratorium for a period of up to six months without holding a public hearing on the proposal
provided that a public hearing is held within at least sixty days of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247 to impose a two -month
moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the BD2 zone
that does not front on a designated street front; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the moratorium was held on April 5, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the moratorium is scheduled to expire on April 15, 2022; and
WHEREAS, having considered the matter and having heard from the public, the city
council needs some additional time to analyze and better understand the history of the various
amendments to the BD zoning code; and
Packet Pg. 299
8.1.c
WHEREAS, a short extension of the moratorium would allow the city council to perform
this analysis and determine whether the scope of the interim design standards needs to be
modified to address the implications of previous amendments to the designated street front;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Moratorium Extended. The moratorium imposed by Ordinance 4247 is
hereby extended to remain in effect through April 21, 2022.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
C
JEFF TARADAY
�. ... 0sm
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
2
Packet Pg. 300
8.1.c
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
April 5, 2022
April 5, 2022
April 8, 2022
April 13, 2022
4253
Packet Pg. 301
8.1.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4253
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 5th day of April, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No.
4253. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE
ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR
BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A
DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY
ORDINANCE 4247.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 51h day of April, 2022.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 302
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Interim Design Standards for Multifamily -only Buildings in the BD2 zone
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Michael Clugston
Background
On February 15, 2022, Council adopted Ordinance 4247, which declared a two -month emergency
moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for certain projects in the Downtown
Business (BD2) zone. The moratorium applies to projects that require a SEPA threshold determination
on sites that are not subject to the Designated Street Front standards in Chapters 16.43 and 22.43 of the
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The moratorium was intended to give staff time to
create interim design standards to address gaps in the code that apply to those sites.
On March 29, staff introduced the proposed interim design standards to Council. A new section would
be added to the existing design standards for the Downtown Business zones in Chapter 22.43 ECDC.
These new standards would only apply to projects in the BD2 zone that do not have the Designated
Street Front requirement and are multifamily -only buildings. The intent of the section is to ensure that
this type of project is compatible within the downtown area.
On April 5, Council held a public hearing on the moratorium and voted to extend the moratorium for
two weeks to allow additional time to consider the proposed interim design standards and to gather
additional information about the history of the Designated Street Front requirements in the BD zones.
Staff also presented the proposed interim design standards and received feedback from Council.
On April 6, staff reviewed the proposed interim design standards with the City's Architectural Design
Board (ADB).
Staff Recommendation
Approve the proposed revised interim design standards in Exhibit 2 and adopt the ordinance in Exhibit 3.
Adopting the proposed ordinance will lift the moratorium on the certain building permit applications
established in Ordinance 4247.
Narrative
The following design standards are proposed for BD2 sites where multifamily -only buildings can be
located.
1) Materials
Packet Pg. 303
8.2
There is currently no preference stated in the code for the types of materials that can be used on the
exterior of a building. This allows flexibility but can result in use of materials that do not reflect the
historic patterns in the downtown area as the Building/Site Identity guidance in the Comprehensive Plan
indicates. To that end, this standard would require the use of preferred materials including natural
stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass. Man-made products like fiber cement could be used
if it is made to look like the preferred materials. While contributing to a more historic look, using a
variety of preferred materials can be used to break up a building's massing.
Feedback from the Council, Architectural Design Board, and public has been favorable to the proposed
standard.
2) Private amenity space
Multifamily -only projects in the BD2 zone would be required to provide 10% of gross lot area in some
form of private amenity space on the project site. This could take the form of balconies, decks, patios,
or yards for individual dwelling units or applied to the site. These spaces would improve livability for the
residents and serve to modulate building facades and reduce building massing.
There are different options proposed to meet this standard because each site and building are unique so
that what makes sense on a BD2 zoned parcel that has no required side setback might not work as well
on a parcel that has a 15-foot required setback from an adjacent R-zoned property.
Feedback from the Council, Architectural Design Board, and public has been generally favorable to the
proposed standard. However, there was some concern about the rooftop deck space. Rooftop decks are
currently allowed by code, provided they meet the height limit for the particular zone. The proposed
standard was written to describe an exception for a rooftop deck when a building was built to the
maximum height.
There was also a question about whether rooftop deck area should be allowed to be located up to the
edge of the roof of a building. The building code does allow safety railings at the edge of the roof of a
building so the rooftop deck space could be located up to the edge of the roof. However, setting the
rooftop deck area back would provide for additional safety.
Another question was whether rooftop deck area should count toward the private amenity space
requirement. With that option, there was a feeling that designers would apply 50% of the private
amenity space to the rooftop in every instance thereby reducing opportunities for balconies, decks, and
patios for individual units.
Based on this feedback, the following changes to the rooftop deck area language are proposed:
4. .
Rooftop decks are encouraged but the area of the deck does not count toward the private
amenity space requirement. Any deck should be located centrally on the roof, but in no instance
closer than 5 feet from the roof edge. Deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above
the height limit provided the railing and guard system has the appearance of being transparent,
such as a frameless glass railing system. No permanent structures are allowed within the roof
deck area when above the height limit, unless otherwise excepted.
Packet Pg. 304
8.2
3) Street -side amenity space or pedestrian area
Multifamily -only projects in the BD2 zone would be required to provide 5% of gross lot area in some
form of street -side amenity space or pedestrian area on the project site. This space would have to be
arranged along the street front between the building and the sidewalk. This standard is consistent with
the Pedestrian Access and Building Setback language in the Comprehensive Plan in that it would serve to
move the building back somewhat from the sidewalk similar to a setback but still allow for pedestrian
connection with the street.
Feedback from the Council, Architectural Design Board, and public has been favorable to the proposed
standard.
Next Steps
This interim code change is very narrowly focused given the time and resources available and did not
involve comprehensive analysis of multifamily design standards throughout the City. The multifamily
design standard project anticipated for 2022 will take a broad look at multifamily areas throughout
Edmonds and will revisit these interim standards as well.
While not specifically related to the design standard work and moratorium, there has been confusion
about whether multifamily -only buildings are permitted outside of the Designated Street Front in the
BD2 zone. They are and a brief history of the Designated Street Front requirement is included as Exhibit
7. The use table for the Downtown Business (BD) zones in ECDC 16.43.020.A could be cleaned up to
make this clearer - staff would work on clarifications at Council's direction.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 - Moratorium Ordinance 4247
Exhibit 2 -
BD2 Interim design standards - revised
Exhibit 3 -
Interim BD2 design standards draft ordinance
Exhibit 4 -
Council 3.29.22 excerpt minutes
Exhibit 5 -
Council draft 4.5.22 excerpt minutes
Exhibit 6 -
Interim Design Standards Presentation 3.29.22
Exhibit 7 - BD2 Zone Development within the Designated Street Front and Legislative Intent
Packet Pg. 305
8.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.4247
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON
THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR
BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT, TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF EDMONDS
ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SUCH
BD2 ZONED LOTS, SETTING TWO MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE
PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM, AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code identifies certain portions of
certain streets in the Downtown Business (BD) zones as designated street fronts; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ECDC 16.43.030.B.2, Map 16.43-1 shows the streets that define
the designated street front for all properties lying within the BD zones; and
WHEREAS, the development regulations in the Downtown Business (BD) zones can
vary depending upon whether the subject property fronts on a designed street front; and
WHEREAS, there is concern that the existing development regulations in the BD2 zone
may not regulate proposed development in a manner that would produce development projects
that reflect community values; and
WHEREAS, this concern can be addressed, initially, through the adoption of interim
zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, city staff should be able to draft interim zoning regulations to address this
concern within about a month; and
WHEREAS, those interim zoning regulations would then be presented to the city council
for consideration and adoption; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 authorizes the city council to adopt an immediate
moratorium for a period of up to six months without holding a public hearing on the proposal
provided that a public hearing is held within at least sixty days of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the city council desires to impose a two -month moratorium on the
acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the BD2 zone that does not front
on a designated street front; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Packet Pg. 306
8.2.a
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this moratorium is to allow the City adequate
time to draft interim zoning regulations for the BD2 zone that would change the required setback
for properties that do not front on a designated street front. For the purposes of this ordinance,
the phrase "designated street front' shall be the portions of the downtown streets defined in
ECDC 16.43.030.B.2 and shown on Map 16.43-1.
Section 2. Moratorium Imposed. The city council hereby imposes a two -month
moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for any property in the BD2 zone
that does not front on a designated street front, PROVIDED THAT the moratorium shall not
apply to building permit applications for projects that are categorically exempt from SEPA
review.
Section 3. Duration of Moratorium. The moratorium imposed by this ordinance shall
commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on
the moratorium and adopts findings and conclusions in support of the moratorium (as
contemplated by Section 4 herein), the moratorium shall not terminate until two (2) months after
the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner.
Section 4. Public Hearing on Moratorium. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW
35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on a moratorium within sixty (60) days
of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on April 5, 2022 unless the city council, by
subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later than the next
regular city council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt
findings of fact on the subject of this moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or
cancel the moratorium.
Packet Pg. 307
8.2.a
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Declaration of Emergency. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the city council, is not subject to referendum. Because it is not subject to
referendum, RCW 35A.12.130 applies. Pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, this ordinance shall take
effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the
city council. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this
ordinance take immediate effect. Without an immediate moratorium on the city's acceptance of
the building permit applications described herein, such applications could become vested,
leading to the development of property that is not consistent with the city's values and vision for
the BD2 zone. Therefore, the moratorium must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect
the public health, safety, and welfare, and to prevent the submission of building permit
applications to the city in an attempt to vest rights. This ordinance does not affect any existing
vested rights.
Section 7. Publication. This ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance is not subject to referendum and shall take
effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it
is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW
35A.12.130. If it is only approved by a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after
passage and publication.
Packet Pg. 308
8.2.a
APPROVED:
MAyok MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
5:�710� ,
T LER ,SCOTT EY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADANN
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: February 15, 2022
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: February 15, 2022
PUBLISHED: February 18, 2022
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 15, 2022
ORDINANCE NO. 4247
Packet Pg. 309
8.2.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4247
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 15t' day of February, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance
No. 4247. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE
EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH
A BD2 LOT THAT DOES NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF
EDMONDS ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS FOR SUCH BD2 ZONED LOTS, SETTING
TWO MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE
MORATORIUM, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 15t' day of February, 2022.
'5:
CL K, SC❑ SSEY
1
Packet Pg. 310
8.2.a
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington }
County of Snohomish } ss
Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH948914 ORDINANCE
SUMMARY as it was published in the regular
and entire issue of said paper and not as a
supplement form thereof for a period of 1
issue(s), such publication commencing on
02/18/2022 and ending on 02/18/2022 and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period.
The amount ' the fee for s h publication is
$65.36.
Subscribed and sworn iaefo me on this
r day of
Z�
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
City of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416
SCOTTPASSEY
Linda PnilllPs
Notary Public
State of Washington
My APPOinlment £xplres 512912a25
QDMMISSIOn Number s477
Packet Pg. 311
Classified Proof
8.2.a
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
of 1he CIty IN Edrnn . N'aSNlrglon
On the 15Lh day of February, 2a22. the C'AY Ccurlcll of the Cky Of
Edimma, paaeeC the Totlowlrg Or®nanCa0. the aummades of eatd
bNlnancas [nnslsling M Ulfes are prwlded ae follows:
ORDINANCE NO 5
AN ORDINANCE OF fF E�CI11 157 EDMONOS. WASHINGTON,
AMEN03NO CHAPTER 1.20 ECC, ENTITLED 'PUBLIC
RECORDS REOUESTS; TO AUGN WITH T14E
REORGANIZATION OF TKE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
ORDINO 42-0fi
AN ORDINANCE OF TH NANCE O EDM SNDS, WASHINGTON.
AUTHORIZING ALLOCATION OF AMEWCAN RESCUE PLAN
ACT PREMIUM PA To THE PURPOSE CIOF EMPLOYEESDING OVID
AND
AND
AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL VACATION DAYS FOR SUCH
EMPLOYEES
OR DINANr E NO. 4 47
AN ORDINANCE OESTABLISHINGNF IMMEDIATE EMERHE CITY OF GENC1f MORA1TORAUM
ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA-IONS
FOR 802 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A
0ESMNA17EO STREET FRONT, TO BE IN EFFBCT UNTIL THE
CM OF EDMONDS ADOPTS INTERIM DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS FOR SUCH B02 ZONED LOTS, SETTING TWO
MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM,
AND DECLARING EMERGENCY N . 4248
AN ORDINANCE OF O DS: WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 5.a4 ECC (PERSONS. CRIMES
RELATING TO)TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE RCW 7.94.120 AND
RCW 7.105A61)'. PROVIDING FOR SEVE113ABILITY; DECLARING
AN EMERGELNCY AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
The 1uO tall of Ihesa Ordrkancaa will b9 sent upon [&quasi.
DATED INs 151h Day of FebrUa ry, 2022.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
PubLshod: FulOMMY 1 % 2=2 EDH948914
Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 02/18/2022 08:49:25 am Page: 2
Packet Pg. 312
8.2.b
22.43.080 Additional Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling
Buildings in the BD2 zone.
A. Intent. To ensure that buildings entirely comprised of multiple dwelling residential units are
compatible with the downtown area.
B. Materials. Building facades must be clad with preferred building materials which include
natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber
cement products and the like may be permitted by the Director or Architectural Design Board if
they replicate the appearance of the preferred materials.
C. Private Amenity Space. An exterior area equivalent to at least 10% of the project's gross lot
area must be provided as private amenity space for residents of the development. This
standard can be met through a combination of balconies (cantilevered, recessed or semi -
recessed), decks, patios or yards for individual dwelling units or the site as a whole.
1. Not all dwelling units are required to have private amenity space. When it is provided,
it must be immediately accessible from the dwelling unit and be a minimum of 40 sq. ft.
2. If the space is at ground level facing a street, no fence may be over three feet in height.
3. Balconies may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a
maximum of 5 feet. Patios and decks may encroach into a required setback adjacent to
R-zoned property up to a maximum of 10 feet.
4. Rooftop decks are encouraged but the area of the deck does not count toward the
private amenity space requirement. Any deck should be located centrally on the roof,
but in no instance closer than 5 feet from the roof edge. Deck railings may extend a
maximum of 42 inches above the height limit provided the railing and guard system has
the appearance of being transparent, such as a frameless glass railing system. No
permanent structures are allowed within the roof deck area when above the height
limit, unless otherwise excepted.
D. Street -side amenity space or Pedestrian Area. An exterior area equivalent to at least 5% of
the project's gross lot area must be provided as street -side amenity space or pedestrian area.
This space must be arranged along the street front between the building and the sidewalk and
must be open to the sky, unless otherwise excepted. The space must be pedestrian -oriented
and may include the following elements:
1. Landscaping
2. Seating area
3. A similar feature as approved by the Director or Architectural Design Board
4. Areas allocated to private amenity space cannot be used toward the street -side amenity
space or pedestrian area requirement.
Packet Pg. 313
8.2.c
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND-
ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE,
SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE
INTERIM STANDARDS, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT
WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247.
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which
established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots
that do not front on a designated street front; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 will terminate on April 15,
2022, unless it is repealed sooner; and
WHEREAS, the moratorium was intended to allow planning staff sufficient time to draft
interim regulations for the BD2 zone; and
WHEREAS, planning staff have now completed a proposed set of interim design
standards for the BD2 zone; and
WHEREAS, planning staff continue to work on a permanent set of multi -family design
standards, which could be ready for adoption in the next six -months; and
WHEREAS, while the work referenced above continues, the city council desires to adopt
the following interim standards to bring the BD2 regulation into closer harmony with the city's
values and policy statements; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Interim Design Standards. A new section 22.43.080, entitled "Additional
Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone," is hereby added
to the Edmonds Community Development Code to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth.
Section 2. Repeal of Moratorium. Ordinance 4247, which had established a
moratorium on certain development in the BD2 zone, is hereby repealed.
Packet Pg. 314
8.2.c
Section 3. Duration of Interim Design Standards. The interim design standards
adopted by this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the
city holds a public hearing on this ordinance and adopts findings and conclusions in support of
its continued effectiveness (as contemplated by Section 4 herein), this ordinance shall not
terminate until six (6) months after the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner.
Section 4. Public Hearing on Interim Standards. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and
RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance within
sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on May , 2022 unless
the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No
later than the next regular council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council
shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this interim ordinance and either justify its
continued effectiveness or repeal the interim ordinance.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
Packet Pg. 315
8.2.c
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Im
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 316
8.2.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND-
ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE,
SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE
INTERIM STANDARDS, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT
WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2022.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 317
8.2.d
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT,
BUCKSHNIS, L. JOHNSON AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K.
JOHNSON VOTING NO.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE
BD2 ZONE
Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin acknowledged that, 1) there is a housing affordability
issue in Edmonds, 2) the comprehensive plan supports a variety of housing types including multifamily
development in the downtown activity center, and 3) in the interest of seeing successful multifamily
development, it is critical that there are design standards to support that. The proposed interim design
standards are intended to fill the gap for multifamily buildings in the BD2 zone. Staff welcomes council
feedback on the interim design standards.
Senior Planner Mike Clugston reviewed:
• Moratorium Ordinance 4247:
o "The purpose of this moratorium is to allow the City adequate time to draft interim zoning
regulations for the BD2 zone that would change the required setback for properties that do
not front on a Designated Street Front."
o This was NOT a comprehensive look at the BD zones or multifamily design standards
• Downtown Business Zones
Designated Street Front
o BD 1 — Retail Core
o BD2 — Mixed Commercial
o BD3 — Convenience Commercial
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 11
Packet Pg. 318
8.2.d
o BD4 - Mixed Residential
o BD5 - Arts Corridor
Designated Street Front (identified by blue line on above map) Standards
o Commercial and mixed -use building
0 45-foot depth of ground floor commercial
o Floor height minimums
o Transparency and access at sidewalk
o Detail at ground level
o Multifamily allowed behind 45 feet or above
BD2 parcels without Designated Street Front (on the edges of the BD2 zone, transition between
the core and typically multifamily residential or single family residential)
o Small area on Main Street, small area on 2' Avenue a few parcels up 3' and 2nd Avenues and
two parcels on Sunset.
o Two situations
1. Property is adjacent to R-zoned property, and/or
2. Property is adjacent to other BD2 property
Comprehensive Plan: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center
o Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and
office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong
central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting
commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and
plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas.
■ E.1 Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial,
and cultural activities.
o Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal F. Focus development between the commercial and retail
core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi -family
residential uses
Comprehensive Plan: Downtown Design Goals and Policies
o Vehicular access and parking
o Pedestrian access and connections
o Building setbacks
o Building/site identity
o Massing
Proposed design standards
o Materials
■ Benefits
- Breaks up massing; strengthens identity
- Preferred exterior materials: stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass
- Manmade okay if made to look like preferred
- Photos of projects using more traditional building materials
o Street -side amenity space
■ Benefits
- Results in setback to the street to serve as amenity space
- Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience
- Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity
■ Plan view - Street -side Amenity Space
- 5% of lot area must be provided
- Shall be between building and sidewalk only and open to sky
- Must include landscaping, seating, art, etc.
■ Section Cut - Street Facing
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 12
Packet Pg. 319
8.2.d
- Street -side amenity space area excludes any private amenity space area that is
provided at the front of the building
- Canopy/awnings required and does not impact amount of street -side amenity space
o Private amenity space
■ Benefits
- Improves livability for smaller residential units
- Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to align with building
character, orientation and style
- Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the facade and increases
`eyes on the street' thereby improving safety
■ Plan View - Private Amenity Space
- 10% project area
- Balconies, decks, patios, yards
- Together with a dwelling unit or grouped for resident use
- If with individual units, > 40 sf
- 50% of required area can be achieved with a rooftop deck
■ Section Cut - Adjacent Property
- Balconies can project 5' into setback from R-zone property
- Decks and patios 10'
Mr. Clugston explained the goal tonight, if the council is satisfied with the proposed standards, is to adopt
the ordinance in the packet as Exhibit 3 referencing Exhibit 2, the new standards that would be applied to
Chapter 23.43.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she had a problem with the BD zones having no commercial; in her
opinion adding these high density properties was ruining the downtown area because, in her opinion, the
BD2 zone was mixed commercial, not residential. The council should look at all the BD zones because
she did not understand how the downtown area, which should service small business, is suddenly
becoming more dense and apartment blocks. She questioned allowing straight up residential in a BD zone
with no mixed use at all. Ms. McLaughlin answered the code allows solely multifamily developments in
the BD2 when not adjacent to the blue lines (designated street front) on the map. It is meant to be a
transitional space, in an urban development transect, the retail commercial core allows for some
residential but predominantly active storefronts on the ground level. This area was always intended to be
a transitional zone where it will transition to residential only. The parcels on the edges of BD2 are where
that transition is occurring. She acknowledged there could be philosophical differences regarding that.
Mr. Clugston agreed the code specifically allows it. He was not employed by the City when the code was
adopted in 2006/2007, but these are transitional area on the outside edge of the BD2 zone and the feeling
was while it could be mixed use, they could also be just multifamily based on their location relative to the
BD 1 zone around the fountain.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she understood transitional zones, but she wondered how those areas of
BD2 were selected and did not go further into 6t' or further up to Bell. In her opinion, the City needed to
unwind all the BD zones; it is important to keep businesses in the downtown area thriving and not have
high density buildings. She relayed a citizen's question about whether the two lots have different setbacks
and his feeling it should not have gone to the ADB due to the lot differentiation. Mr. Clugston said prior
to adoption of the BD zones, this area was zoned community business (BC). When the different BD zones
were developed, the intent was to apply them to the types of development that were there at the time,
understanding that most of the commercial area will be around the fountain and radiating out, with
transition spaces at the furthest edges. That is what this proposal is trying to address.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 13
Packet Pg. 320
8.2.d
Ms. McLaughlin cautioned about not getting into specifics about the project that is under review. She
clarified there is no variance proposed for that project. Mr. Clugston explained all the development codes
have to be met; the City's variance criteria are very restrictive, primarily related to parcels with
environmental constraints. Virtually nowhere else has a variance been granted in the 15 years he has been
at the City. Councilmember Buckshnis observed there are two different properties. Mr. Clugston
explained they are both zoned BD2 with the exact same development standards. The only difference is the
eastern side of the site is adjacent to multifamily residential which requires a 15' setback. Councilmember
Buckshnis asked if that 15' setback was still required. Mr. Clugston answered it was.
Councilmember Tibbott asked what the setback from the lot lines was for BD2; he understood there was
5% for the front and asked if there was a setback requirement for the side or rear. Mr. Clugston answered
there are zero setbacks from any lot line in the BD2 zone whether street, side or rear. The only setbacks
that exist for these parcels are when they are adjacent to R zoned property which requires a 15' setback.
Councilmember Tibbott asked how long that setback standard had been in effect. Mr. Clugston answered
since 2007 when the code was adopted. Councilmember Tibbott asked what it would take to extend the
blue lines. As the downtown fills up and commercial businesses thrive when there are other good, viable
strong commercial businesses around them, it seems that more commercial space would add to the
vibrancy of the downtown. It has been 15 years since those standards were adopted, it may be necessary
to extend the blue lines. Ms. McLaughlin answered that certainly should be considered in the scoping for
the comprehensive plan update. Given that the downtown activity center is such a robust commercial
retail and residential center, the City needs to analyze commercial demands, the future of retail, as well as
multifamily design standards coupled with how to meet housing needs. Mr. Clugston commented there
have been about 6-7 redevelopment projects since these codes were adopted in 2006/2007. The pace of
turnover is very small for a number of reasons. The developer could have proposed a mixed use building
for this site but chose not to, believing that residential made more sense than mixed use.
Councilmember Tibbott referred to the areas on the edges of the BD2 without Designated Street Front
that have been filling in and said there may be opportunities to extend the vibrant business life. He asked
if there were any ingress/egress parking standards in BD2, and if so, what were they and what provisions
were made to go from a garage to an alley or from a parking lot to a public street. Mr. Clugston said the
code does not want access onto the main streets and to have residents use the alley as much as possible.
Buildings that do propose to use the alley need to ensure that access can occur safely. Ensuring that
access occurs in a safe manner is reviewed with every with building permit.
If a building went up to the rear lot line, Councilmember Tibbott asked if turning radius inside the
building would be required, wide enough garage doors for sight distance, etc. Mr. Clugston referred to the
post office where there is a gap in the wall from one of the drive aisles to allow drivers to see pedestrian
on the sidewalks, or sometimes mirrors are used. There are a number of different ways that can be
addressed. Councilmember Tibbott observed those standards are already in the code. Mr. Clugston agreed
they were.
Council President Olson said the overriding reason for standards is to protect other properties in the area,
other homeowners in the area and the community as a whole. She thanked staff for this proposal which
addressed something that was lacking and what they have brought forward makes a difference and will
help with projects that fall into this gap. However, two significant things were not addressed that she
hoped could be addressed, first the issue of accommodating loading/unloading on the property. This is 24
units that will have regular turnover, whether it is the tenants moving in and out or having furniture or
appliances delivered. She was concerned with a building accommodating 24 families not designating an
area for deliveries and felt it should be addressed in the code or be a design requirement. The loading
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 14
Packet Pg. 321
8.2.d
zone could be the setback and provide additional space for people entering/exiting their garages from the
alley.
Ms. McLaughlin expressed concern that Council President Olson's question was very project related. She
offered to speak in theory but not to the project itself as the proposed standards are applicable to all
parcels in the BD2 zone. Council President Olson pushed back on that assertion, pointing out any
buildings without setbacks on the alley would be in the same situation. Ms. Laughlin said there are
temporary right-of-way permits for loading for this reason. There will be episodic loading needs in any
urban environment, particularly for moving in/out of buildings. A requirement to accommodate a WB-67
moving truck would deem parking structures infeasible due to turning movements. Staff could look at
what that would require and how much space it would take out of the programmatic area, requiring the
developer to compensate in other aspects of the project to make that program work. The nature of an alley
is that it is slightly utilitarian. Requiring a 25' width to allow a truck to unload would be a significant
amount of space in the alley, pushing the alley to 44' wide.
Council President Olson commented it would not increase the alley width, it would be on the property
and made available for loading/unloading which can be expected to occur with some regularity. Ms.
McLaughlin said that would need to be dimensioned out. The reason why that is not seen in any other city
is because the curb space or alleys themselves are typically used for loading/unloading and moving.
Council President Olson referred to the use of "urban" and pushed back, saying Edmonds is a suburban
and not an urban environment and she hoped that was part of the planning. Use of the alley for
ingress/egress to garages has been encouraged, and loading/unloading from the alley could block access
which would have a huge impact. She was trying to assess if it was an option to require some setback
from the alley. Ms. McLaughlin asked if her question was how to accommodate moving trucks onsite.
Council President Olson answered it was related to moving trucks or delivery trucks. Ms. McLaughlin
said the engineering/permitting team could answer that question better than she could and offered to
provide further information.
Council President Olson said her other issue was consolidating parcels, which is not mandated, and
should be an opportunity for the City to get a concession that supports the comprehensive plan. The
comprehensive plan says the City cares about light and not having huge, blocky structures, but this
building on a slope which the building height assessed at that level, the center point would be in a
different place on one of the parcels versus the consolidated parcel. Consolidating parcels has a negative
impact in terms of light. When that is allowed, there should be a requirement for a step down or
modulation in the roof line to provide breaks of light to everything around it. That should be required
because the parcels are being consolidated and they are not currently allowed to be built on in that
manner. If the lots were developed without consolidating them, there would be breaks between the
buildings due to required setbacks.
Ms. McLaughlin said State law exempts lot combinations from the subdivision law, essentially
streamlining lot combination which is intended to ensure it is not a hinderance to meeting density goals.
The City does have some discretion to ensure any lot combination meets the objectives within the
comprehensive plan. Mr. Clugston explained there is no required setback between the parcels, if they are
both zoned BD, they can be built wall to wall. The only time a setback is required is if it is adjacent to a
residentially residential zoned parcel. As an example, he referred to a clump of parcels south of Main
between 6'1i and Durbin where, in theory, one person could buy the approximately 8 parcels and construct
one building on it. At the northeast corner of 6' & Main, one person could buy three parcels, combine
them and develop one project on the site. Lot consolidation for projects happens all the time; if someone
owns all the parcels, they can be combined and a larger project developed on it. That would also apply to
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 15
Packet Pg. 322
8.2.d
parcels on 3rd and there are no setbacks between the parcels because they are not adjacent to an R zoned
property. Even if one person did not own all the parcels, each property could be developed wall to wall.
Mr. Clugston continued, the intent of the design standards is when there are two adjacent BD2 parcels
that could have multifamily, private amenity space needs to be provided. One of the ways to do that is
either move the building back to provide a balcony that projects out or create a balcony that is recessed
into the building; either way provides some modulation. There are other ways to achieve that standard
such as a rooftop desk. When there are no setbacks, buildings can be constructed right to the property line
and that is the case with the overwhelming majority of the parcels in the BD zones.
Council President Olson said that explanation clarified it for her. She asked if the City just got lucky with
the architectural design of the first two parcels at 6th & Main that follow the slope. That makes a big
difference and she was unsure if that occurred because the developer chose to be nice and cared about
making the community look good, or if the City had it in code. Mr. Clugston said he was not familiar with
the location Council President Olson was referencing. Council President Olson referred to the buildings
on the north side of the street at 6t' & Main, the two largest parcels on the northwest corner of the
intersection. Mr. Clugston answered those were zoned multifamily, not B132, and were built a number of
years ago so he did not know what the code requirement was for height measurement at that time.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked for a description of public amenity space. Mr. Clugston displayed the
plan view, explaining the street -side amenity space has to be 5% of the lot area and must be provided
between the building and the sidewalk, be open to the sky and must include landscaping, seating, art, or
similar elements. He displayed the section view, identifying the street -side amenity space, the space
between the sidewalk and the building front that acts like a setback that is activated through uses.
Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the map that illustrates the areas with and without designated
street fronts, recalling Mr. Clugston's comment that the areas on the edges of B132 without designated
street fronts were transitional areas. Mr. Clugston referred to the intersection of Main & 5t'', and the
parcels radiating away from that, the BD 1 zone, the retail core. Just outside of that on all sides is the B132
zone, adjacent to the retail core and in some instances does not extend very far but in some areas it does.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked what PRD 2002-102 means. Mr. Clugston answered it was a Planned
Residential Development for single family development. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if
loading/unloading spaces were required for any other residential type. Mr. Clugston answered not to his
knowledge.
Councilmember Chen said he had two questions, first, as the City grows, would the BD 1 zone need to be
expanded into the BD2 zone. Ms. Mclaughlin said that is something that the needs analysis as part of the
comprehensive plan update will consider, what are the City's commercial and retail demands and where
should they be located, looking at the City and its activity centers as a whole, including the medical
center, downtown and waterfront. She looked forward to doing a needs analysis and engaging the council
in those discussions. Edmonds is unique in the sense that all the retail spaces are occupied which is a great
sign. It was unclear where there was pent up demand; that will require some retail analysis.
Councilmember Chen said his second question was whether the interim code only applied to residential or
if it applied to both residential and mixed use, noting the current code allows both residential and mixed
use. Mr. Clugston said there are existing design standards that apply to mixed use or commercial/office
projects. This proposal would apply only to standalone multifamily buildings. Because this is residential
only, the same amount of design analysis has not been done which is why these standards have been
proposed. Ms. McLaughlin said that is the unanticipated gap; the intent is to fill that gap with these
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 16
Packet Pg. 323
8.2.d
interim design standards specifically for multifamily. Staff is also working on multifamily design
standards that would apply citywide.
Councilmember Chen suggested the recommendations from the Citizen Housing Commission (CHC) be
revisited and incorporated. Ms. McLaughlin agreed some of the CHC's recommendations were applicable
to multifamily design standards and others will be applicable to the comprehensive plan update.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she still has an issue with not being project specific when it was dealing
with a project. This will be displacing 7-8 businesses, some of them women -owned, in the downtown
business district. Acknowledging the council cannot consider project specifics, she asked if traffic,
stormwater, or sewer impacts had been considered. As this will be a dense project with 24 - 48 extra cars,
she asked if a traffic study had been done. She referred to the aging infrastructure, recalling a sewer break
on 5' Avenue in the past. Ms. McLaughlin assured that was part of the permitting process which looks at
everything that Councilmember Buckshnis mentioned including the need for traffic analysis, stormwater,
existing utilities, what it can support and whether there is capacity. Councilmember Buckshnis asked the
timeframe for the citywide multifamily design standards. Ms. McLaughlin answered the senior planner
that was leading the effort left the City. Recruitment is underway for that position and it may be expedited
by moving to a consultant process; those options are being analyzed.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled discussions at the Economic Development Commission about light
and buildings next to each other and interest in setbacks. She recalled there were setbacks in Westgate and
asked why no setbacks were being enforced to allow for light for adjacent buildings so they did not just
look out on a wall. Ms. McLaughlin answered defining light and air can be fairly subjective. There could
be a lighting/shadow study done on projects which was something she recommended. Oftentimes when
there is an alley or street, particularly when the street is up to 25' wide, the light and air issue is mitigated
by having that space in between buildings. Looking at historic downtowns within a tight urban fabric, the
buildings are adjacent to each other like in Edmonds downtown core; the street provides light, air and
separation. The same is seen in the development that is currently under review. Councilmember
Buckshnis said there is plenty of density in the downtown area. Her issue is changing the mix of the BD
zone, and making it more residential. She was aware it was allowed because it was not identified as a
designated street front but she was still concerned that mixed use was not required.
Council President Olson said this question was already answered but she wanted to be sure staff
understood the question the way she intended; staff was saying no other condos or apartments were
required to provide loading/unloading even if there is no parking lot associated with the complex. Ms.
McLaughlin said in talking with Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien today about this issue, the
only one he could recall was a project that requested a loading zone.
Council President Olson said this comment was not related to the specific item but for all planning going
forward, especially in downtown areas, when the building follows the slope like it does between 5t' & 6t'
on the north side of Main, it is great and charming and although there are no setbacks on the side, it is so
cute. She hoped that could be implemented in more places and made a priority in planning going forward.
Councilmember Chen commented in terms of timing, the moratorium is expiring so there is some
urgency. Ms. McLaughlin said in the interest of lifting the moratorium, given the magnitude of a
moratorium on development and market dynamics, a public hearing on the moratorium is scheduled on
April 5t''. These interim design standards will be returned to council on April 5t'; staff s recommendation
is that the interim design standards be adopted and the moratorium would then be lifted on April 5tn
With regard to the effective date of the proposed ordinance, City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained as
currently drafted, it would not take immediate effect. Assuming it is adopted on April 5t'', it would not
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 17
Packet Pg. 324
8.2.d
take effect until April 15'. The ordinance could be drafted to take immediate effect, but it would require a
majority plus one vote to pass.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if there was any risk with continuing with the current proposed
timeline of a public hearing on April 5' and adoption of the interim design standards on April 5'. Mr.
Taraday answered by his calculation if the ordinance is adopted on April 5" without an emergency clause,
it would take effect on April 15th. City Clerk Scott Passey advised it would take effect on April 13'. Mr.
Taraday said that was before the moratorium expired. Councilmember L. Johnson observed adding an
emergency clause would allow the ordinance to take effect sooner if there was some benefit to that. Mr.
Taraday agreed.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked about the benefit of have more than 5% public open space and what the
timing would be to incorporate that change into the proposed ordinance. Mr. Clugston answered given the
short amount of time, it would be easier to stick with this proposal. That could be considered in the
permanent multifamily design standards. Councilmember K. Johnson requested staff put that on the list of
things to look at in the permanent standards.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the setback standards for RM-1 weren't used such as in the BD4
zone. She recognized this was a transition zone and the intent is a standalone multifamily property. Mr.
Clugston explained BD2 is mixed commercial adjacent to BD1. He displayed a map identifying the BD4
zone, downtown mixed residential, which is located in the southwest area of downtown and off by itself.
In BD4, if a project is mixed use, there are no setbacks; if it is multifamily only, then RM-1.5 setbacks
apply. The three sites that the DB4 zone covers are large, developed sites that were developed without
designated street front standards. The RM setbacks are not appropriate for the BD2 zoned parcels which
do not have side setbacks unless adjacent to residential which has a 15' setback requirement.
With regard to adding an emergency clause to the ordinance, Council President Olson said if the effective
date of the ordinance fit within the moratorium period without an emergency clause, how would an
emergency be justified? Mr. Taraday said that was a good question; he did not want to rule out the
possibility that an emergency declaration could be drafted that would be valid, but Council President
Olson was correct that the ordinance would need to state the basis for taking emergency action. That basis
is usually left to the discretion of the legislative body. If council or staff suggested a basis for an
emergency, he would not eliminate that possibility, but she was correct that expiration of the moratorium
was one basis that probably wouldn't satisfy the emergency clause.
3. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20.03 ECDC RELATED TO ADDRESSES FOR
USE IN MAILED NOTICE
Council President Olson explained the reason for notices is to make citizens and other stakeholders aware
when there is a project that might influence their interests. The City has been made aware that notices are
not always getting to the right people. The intent of this item is to determine how to change the code to
resolve that via a code update. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained this ordinance was requested by the
council president. He tried to correct something that had been brought to her attention, that there are two
different types of owner addresses held by Snohomish County, the taxpayer address and the owner
address. Most often those addresses are the same, but it is possible for a property owner to contact the
county and ask that tax statements be sent to a different address such as when someone owns property in
the City but does not reside at the property and wants to receive mail elsewhere. The question is how to
best provide notice to the public, in this case about development projects but it could be posed even more
broadly.
Mr. Taraday continued, because he did not involve City staff early enough, some issues were raised late
in the game as this was going into the packet that have not yet been resolved. One such issue is that
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 29, 2022
Page 18
Packet Pg. 325
8.2.e
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tern Olson described the procedures for in -person audience comments.
Linda Fireman, Edmonds, said she would be commenting on zoning as it relates to proposed plan 2021-
0066. She relayed 605 and 611 Main are zoned BD2 or Downtown Mixed Commercial. Ordinance 3955
relates only to BD1 and only shows subdistricts and permitted uses and is included on the website in
Chapter 16.43 DB Downtown Business Permitted Uses for BD2 under 16.43.020 uses for residential and
does not reference designated street fronts. Under Table 16.43-1 it can be a single family dwelling or
multiple dwelling units but must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45-feet from the
sidewalk or rights -of -way. The code is very easy to understand; there is no reference to designated street
fronts and there is no B Permitted secondary uses or C. Primary uses requiring conditional use permit
shown under the permitted uses for BD2. Table 16.43-1 documents the permitted uses; multiple dwelling
units in BD2 must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45-feet from sidewalk or rights -of -
way. Multiple dwelling units can be on the ground floor at 605/611 Main Street as long as they are
located behind the first 45-feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way. She proposed if the proposed
apartment building is allowed to proceed without commercial space that the zoning be changed to RM-1.5
before planning begins and conform to zoning of the neighborhood. 601 Main is now a single family
home. A public hearing and referendum would be welcome.
Susie Schafer, Edmonds, read a proclamation from Governor Inslee on native plants:
WHEREAS, native plant species are an important part of Washington's heritage, providing important
aesthetic, economic and ecological contributions that make Washington a special place to live; and
WHEREAS, Washington enjoys an amazing biodiversity with over 3,000 native plant species, from
rain forest plants on the Olympic Peninsula to the desert species in Eastern Washington; and
WHEREAS, preserving native plant ecosystems is critical for protecting wildlife, birds, fish and
water quality in our state; and
WHEREAS, native plant ecosystems protect our watersheds by recharging natural aquifers,
modulating stream flows, filtering water and reducing erosion and flooding; and
WHEREAS, over 350 of our native plant species are listed as rare by the Washington Natural
Heritage Program; and
WHEREAS invasive species present a great threat to sustaining our native plant ecosystems and
biodiversity; and
WHEREAS, climate change significantly impacts Washington's native plants and their habitats,
requiring action to protect them from climate change;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jay Inslee, Governor of the state of Washington, do hereby proclaim the
month of April 2022 as Native Plant Appreciation Month in Washington and I encourage all people in our
state to join me in appreciating, enjoying and celebrating our floral diversity by learning more about our
native plants and their habitats.
Ms. Schaefer continued, stating this was a fabulous proclamation and she was happy to share it with the
council and the public. She encouraged the city council, mayor, all departments, commissions and boards
to adopt this and follow it. She relayed the native plant demonstration garden has reopened. It was
replanted on March 12' and many the plants relocated to City Park. The first program at the
demonstration garden will be held later this month.
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, relayed she opened her real estate brokerage in 1980; she started in real estate
in Magnolia in 1971 and almost bought an office there but is grateful she came to Edmonds because it is a
community that can come together and speak to its council. She expressed her appreciation to the council
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 2
Packet Pg. 326
8.2.e
for their service, recognizing it was not an easy job. The council is good at their jobs and may be about
the best council the City has had. She has worked under 5-6 mayors, recalling Harve Harrison was a part-
time mayor when she opened her brokerage. The community has worked hard to retain and restore the
specialness of Edmonds. It has been her pleasure to have the historic house at 524 Main Street, built in
1890 for the blacksmith and his daughter. She encouraged the community to continue to work together,
noting she has been on a lot of committees including currently serving on the cemetery board.
Recognizing that density is coming, she expressed support for retaining parks and green areas. She
reiterated her thanks to the city council.
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, referred to agenda item 8.1, interim design standards relaying comments
from a local, well -respected architect who has dedicated the majority of his over 20-year professional
career to the analysis and design of building envelop systems who reviewed staff s proposed design
standards. "I read the 22.43.080 additional design standards you sent. My opinions are an attempt to work
within the ideas these new additional design standards address. My opinions: 1. Intent: this statement is
too broad in nature, "compatible" is meaningless without further parameters. Such items as building to
human scale by vertical and horizontal modulation, building setbacks after a certain height and other
defining parameters must be included to make an intent statement. 2. Item 3 balconies: this as written is a
concern. This is an encroachment into the setbacks that can be exploited without further definition.
Should the deck encroachment be allowed, guardrails should be transparent to lessen their visual impact.
Decks encroaching into setbacks should be limited to the second floor only. Upper floor setbacks as
indicated in my number 1 above will then have decks that do not enter the setback.
3. Decks at grade encroaching into setbacks shouldn't be allowed. Patios on grade are okay if associated
with landscaping requirements. 4. Roof decks: roof decks can work well. Decks should only be within the
middle portions of the building roof footprint. Roof decks should be setback from the roof edges a
minimum of 5 feet. This will eliminate the ability to see into windows of adjacent buildings. The roof
decks must also have a landscape requirement. 5. Also Item 4, the last sentence "no permanent structures
are allowed within the roof deck area" means there can be no roof deck access. Without access, there can
be no roof deck. An elevator for disabled people and an exit stair for smaller roof decks are required by
the building code. Roof decks exceeding 150 square feet require two separate exits. The towers extend the
building height. This visual effect will be lessened or eliminated with stairs or elevators set to the interior
portion of the building roof. 6. 1 believe the 22.43.080 standards can work with further thought and
definition. The above opinions can be helpful in making the City's design standards work for scale and
making more interesting building designs for the BD2 zone." Dr. Dotsch thanked the council for their
consideration of this professional opinion.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, requested the council reconsider approval of the agenda, pointing out any
councilmember who voted in favor can make a motion to reconsider. After reconsidering the approval of
the agenda, he requested the council vote to remove item 8.1 from the agenda. RCW 35A.12.130 states
that no ordinance shall contain more than one subject and that must clearly be expressed its title. The title
to the proposed ordinance on page 78 of tonight's packet clearly contains more than one subject. It is
even comingled with a separate subject, whether or not to continue or cancel a moratorium adopted on
February 151}i. Council has not yet adopted findings of fact about the February 151}i moratorium, findings
that will either justify continuing the moratorium or canceling the moratorium. He asked why the
proposed moratorium on page 78 of tonight's packet implies what the council will decide to do about the
moratorium; council has not yet heard public comments on the moratorium and he urged the council to
respect citizens and public comments. He asked the council to also request that staff respect the
comprehensive plan and the City code. Table 16.43-1 in the City code establishes all permitted uses for
the entire BD zone which includes five distinct subdistricts.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 3
Packet Pg. 327
8.2.e
Mr. Reidy continued, the BD2 subdistrict is called downtown mixed commercial; the name of the BD2
subdistrict is easily found on page 56 of the 2020 comprehensive plan. For downtown mixed commercial,
the comprehensive plan clearly states to encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be
designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses with
commercial entries at street level. Per the City code, in the BD2 subdistrict, the only way a property can
host 100% residential use is if it is a single family residence. If a property owner opts for multiple
dwelling units, those units must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45 feet from sidewalk or
rights -of -way. The code is easy to understand; there are no transitional areas within BD2 and can be
easily confirmed by searching the code for the word "transitional." He read on Law Insider that adjacent
lots include parcels that are separated only by a private or public street. This includes lots that are across a
public right-of-way from each other. He asked whether any councilmembers had researched this
important topic. The City code uses the word "adjacent."
Mayor Pro Tern Olson described the procedures for virtual audience comments.
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, commenting on the tree ordinance passed last year, said property rights
are one of the most fundamental, constitutional provisions that protect Americans against government
abuse. Unfortunately, these rights are under assault by the City of Edmonds who are aggressively
targeting property owners applying to divide their property and build desperately needed single family
homes. The City's tree ordinance has seized property rights without providing compensation for the loss
and unbelievably is charging owners for the rights to their own property — their trees. In the USA, the
worth and property rights of trees belong to the owners of the land they are growing on unless otherwise
agreed upon. Property rights to 100% of the trees on all single family zoned vacant properties in Edmonds
have been seized before divisions or permits are issued. Edmonds then requires payment of $3,000-
$12,000 for the right to each of the trees needing removal for homes to be built and illegally retaining
control of the remaining trees on the property indefinitely with no considerations for gardens, natural light
or mountain and sound views. New homeowners won't even be allowed to maintain their own trees. This
is a gross violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Ms. Ferkingstad continued, the takings clause in the 5t1i amendment requires if the government seizes
property for public use, the owner must be provided just compensation; the opposite has been done here.
Property owners are being charged and property taken. Constant vigilance is necessary to protect property
owners against any government encroachments on constitutional rights. For this reason, all mayors and
councilmember publicly swear an oath to protect the constitution of the United States when they take
office, yet here the Edmonds mayor and council knowingly violated their oath and forced a tree ordinance
that seizes property rights and instead of just compensation, charges owners hundreds of thousands to
restore only partial rights to their property. Mr. Chave stated during a council meeting that only an owner
can voluntarily submit their trees to be protected by the City. Theirs have been taken against their will.
Property owners building needed homes while complying with stormwater, 30% open green space,
multifamily has a 5%-15% requirement, and thousands of pages of Edmonds code and paying tens of
thousands for permits, are being taken advantage of and abused by the City, harming the community and
electeds' credibility. The mayor and council have shown their willingness to violate the constitution so
which laws can the public trust them to follow? She requested they restore her and her 87-old parents'
property rights and other property owners' rights without the illegal incumbrances they are enforcing so
they may use their property for what it is zoned for, building single family homes.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, said her comments would focus on equity, representation and the development
of the PROS Plan. With regard to equity, she heard councilmembers at last week's meeting express
sadness over the inability to start the marsh project sooner. Great news, the tidal channel can be restored
instead of re -engineering it to drain south through Marina Beach by prioritizing fish over existing
downtown amenities and the concerns of people who own boats. Re -engineering the marsh to purchase
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 4
Packet Pg. 328
8.2.e
2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED
STREET FRONT
Senior Planner Mike Clugston explained the moratorium ordinance was intended to allow staff adequate
time to draft interim zoning regulations for the BD2 zone that would change the required setback for
properties that do not front on a designated street front. A presentation was made at last week's council
meeting regarding the interim standards and council did not take action at that time. The moratorium,
adopted as an emergency ordinance on February 15, 2022, stated a public hearing would be held within
60 days of its adoption and that it would expire by April 15, 2022 unless action was taken. Staff
recommends the council adopt the proposed interim design standards and thereby repeal the moratorium.
The interim standards relate to materials, private amenity space, streetside amenity space and are
narrowly focused on just standalone residential projects in the BD2 zone. The interim standards can be
revisited during the multifamily design standard project coming up later this year that will look more
broadly at multifamily throughout the City.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson opened the public hearing.
Linda Fireman, Edmonds, requested the moratorium be extended indefinitely because she did not
believe the code was being applied correctly and that needed to be addressed first. The interim design
standards are very narrow and just provided so that these apartment buildings can go ahead without any
further discussion which she did not think was right. Once they are constructed, they will always be there
and there needs to be a broader and more substantial look at this. Permitted primary uses for B2
residential are single family and multifamily dwelling units located on the second floor or behind the first
45 feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way and it does not reference designated street fronts, therefore the
ability to have only multifamily development without commercial space is not legal. The narrative states
that all parcels zoned BD are subject to designated street front requirements in chapter 16.43 and 22.43
ECDC that were adopted in 2007. She has been trying to get documentation, but it has not been
forthcoming. She thanked Mayor Pro Tem Olson who provided Ordinance 3955 passed by the council on
January 21, 2014. She referred to 16.43.020 Uses and Table 16.43-1 Permitted Uses from the website
which are the same. It does not reference designated street fronts so what is stated in the narrative is not
correct.
Ms. Fireman continued, the standards are meant to address commercial and mixed use buildings and
require a 45-foot depth ground floor commercial space in building measured from the street property line,
minimum floor to ceiling heights, etc. However, there are several small areas near the edges of downtown
BD2 mixed commercial zone that are not subject to these requirements and in these locations other types
of buildings could be constructed including multifamily only building. She did not agree with that. The
current permitted uses do not allow this and for some reason if it is allowed, it should be rezoned to RM-
1.5 before planning begins. Interim design standards only cover minor changes written to appease public
complaining about the look and doesn't affect the bulk and mass, the alley or zoning discrepancies. The
city, the mayor, the development department, the planning department and the council are responsible for
zoning and comprehensive plan. This should be done clearly and with care before development is allowed
to proceed. She urged them not to let ambiguous wording and site development standards and design
standards in BD zones take precedence.
John Hoag, Edmonds, member of Economic Development Commission, but speaking as a private
citizen, said he was alarmed by Development Services Director McLaughlin's comment at last week's
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 6
Packet Pg. 329
8.2.e
council meeting regarding the pending BD2 zone moratorium that there is a housing crisis in the region
and inferring that this need takes precedence above every other zoning parameter in the City. That
statement was prejudicial to the discussion. He opposed the changes to the BD2 zone as currently
proposed, not because of the amount of housing, but because of the 100% loss of commercial space. One
current potential development is well within the downtown core and commercial zone; that is why it is
zoned business district. Like the unit lot subdivision proposal a few months ago, there are forces at work
in Edmonds to remove commercial space in ideal commercial locations and predominantly or 100%
replace it with housing. He believed these changes would further erode existing commercial space set
aside for business, business expansion or new business for the City, thus stifling job creation and business
recruitment, and is very short-sighted planning and piecemeal. Mayor Nelson has made climate action one
of the community's priorities; having goods and services within walking and biking distance from
neighborhood districts or hubs can only happen if a certain amount of commercial space is maintained. If
work/live is truly desired in Edmonds, he recommended the City stop prioritizing housing over
commercial space. He could not find anywhere in the City's code in which the 13132 zone, downtown
mixed commercial, allowed 100% multifamily housing; it is a mixed commercial zone and commercial
must be part of any new development.
Greg Brewer, Edmonds, commended the council for hitting the pause button on 13132 commercial
development as there is precious little business space in the downtown core. Previous councilmembers
and planners have lamented over the potential loss of business space in the downtown core. BD2,
downtown mixed commercial, was never meant to be 100% residential. The comprehensive plan states
under economic development goals, page 112 B4, continue to foster and enhance the economic vitality of
downtown Edmonds, including retention of growth of existing businesses, attraction of new businesses
and promotion of appropriate in -fill redevelopment. The existing code supports this. BD2 is defined in the
code as mixed commercial; in chapter 16.43 page 13, item 7, the code clearly states within BD2,
commercial development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses within the designated
street front. Any permitted use may be located on the ground floor outside of the designated street front.
BD commercial mixed use, same chapter, page 3, reads as follows: multiple dwelling units are permitted
with the following stipulation: multiple dwelling units must be located on the second floor or behind first
45 feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -way.
Mr. Brewer urged the council not to be misled; there is nothing in the code allowing 100% residential
dwellings in the BD2 mixed commercial zone. Unless a building is a single family residence, the code
clearly states the first 45 feet of the ground floor needs to be commercial. As a citizen, he applauded the
City's efforts to strengthen design standards and setbacks, but any revisions to the interim code should be
to strengthen BD2 mixed commercial requirement and encourage more open space, modulation and
articulation, not diminish or replace current codes. All current and future BD2 commercial mixed use
projects should foster and enhance the economic vitality of downtown Edmonds as stated in the
comprehensive plan.
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, commented the community has worked hard over the last 42 years that she
has been involved to have a commercial area and to allow residents to live above commercial and she did
not recommend deviating from that now. As a residential real estate broker, she was in favor of housing,
but said it did not have to be in that block of Main Street as there were many opportunities for housing in
other locations. She urged the council to take a serious look at this and not go backwards.
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, asked what legal definition was being used for the BD2 zone in moratorium
ordinance 4247. Page 55 of the comprehensive plan under the 2015 alternatives analysis states, "New
development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall
design objectives and the intent of the various districts described for the downtown area." She referred to
ECDC chapter 16.43, 16.43.010 subdistricts which states, "The downtown business zone is divided into
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 7
Packet Pg. 330
8.2.e
five distinct subdistricts intended to implement specific aspects of the Comprehensive Plan that pertain to
the downtown waterfront activity center. Each subdistrict contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning
regulations as describe in this chapter. The five subdistricts are BD1 downtown retail core, BD2
downtown mixed commercial, BD3 downtown convenience commercial, BD4 downtown mixed
residential, BD5 downtown arts corridor." She recommended reaffirming the unique intent of the BD2
downtown mixed commercial district on page 56 of the 2020 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
adopted on November 17, 2020. Downtown mixed commercial, to encourage a vibrant downtown, first
floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and
commercial uses with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line.
Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first
floor of the building must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design
guidelines should provide for pedestrian scale design features, differentiating the lower commercial floor
from the upper floors of the building. The design of the interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible
commercial space.
Dr. Dotsch encouraged the council to read the remainder for themselves. If the intent tonight was to
rename pieces of the BD2 downtown mixed commercial subdistrict to BD4 downtown mixed residential,
she asked the council to explain when that was done and where it was documented. If it was spot rezoned
at one point, only those 25+ BD2 lots within the BD2 subdistrict designation in 16.43.010 to a different
intent of development of uses, where can the public find that documentation and was the selective spot
zoning of those 25+ lots legal? She asked that her questions be answered in a transparent manner in front
of the public at this public hearing tonight before any decision was made on what legal definition was
being used for the BD2 zone in moratorium ordinance 4247. If these cannot be answered, she suggested
extending the moratorium up to a possible four months or ask that a new ordinance be drafted for six
months to allow time for a clearly defined and legally agreed upon definition of the BD2 downtown
mixed commercial subdistrict before any current or future building permit application is accepted in this
area.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, asked the council to halt this public hearing; staff has comingled two separate
subjects and made the following recommendation for the public hearing: adopt the interim design
standards and repeal the moratorium. Staff s recommendation clearly involves two things; one of the two
things, adoption of the interim design standards, involves a completely different agenda item that is not
subject to this public hearing. He questioned why the words, proposed interim design standards were
listed when that was not what this public hearing was about. He questioned how staff could recommend
repealing the moratorium prior to the city council discussing which findings of fact the council wanted to
adopt on the subject. Tonight's public hearing is supposed to be for city council to adopt findings of fact
on the subject of the February 151}i moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or cancel the
moratorium. He questioned how citizens are supposed to know how to prepare public comments for this
public hearing when neither the public notice nor agenda packet identified the findings the council will
consider for adoption related to the moratorium.
Mr. Reidy continued, Ordinance 4247 documents that the purpose of the moratorium was to allow the
City adequate time to draft interim zoning regulations for BD2 that would change the required setback for
properties that do not front on a designated street front. Setback is a very clear legal term and everyone
knows what that is. He requested the council ask whether private amenity space was the legal equivalent
of setback. The situation has been very confusing since the moratorium was passed on February 151}i, prior
to any explanation provided to citizens. How do citizens know how to engage with elected officials in
situations like this? BD2, the downtown mixed commercial subdistrict, does not permit property to be
used as 100% residential. He requested the council halt the public hearing and start over. There are
roughly 10 more days to comply with state law. He requested findings of fact regarding the moratorium
be published and citizens be allowed to comment on whether the moratorium should be continued or
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 8
Packet Pg. 331
8.2.e
canceled. That is what this public hearing should have addressed. He questioned why it was comingled
with a separate subject, interim design standards.
Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, asked council to protect the downtown business district and extend the BD2
moratorium for as long as necessary to allow time for design standards and codes to be examined and
clarified so that citizens, the council, staff and developers understand what is permissible in this important
downtown business zone. As others have cited from the code, BD2 is downtown mixed commercial. The
code for BD2 clearly states multiple dwelling units must be located on the second floor behind first 45
feet from sidewalk or rights -of -way. Therefore, all buildings involving multifamily residential in 13132
must be mixed use and no multifamily only buildings should be considered by the building department.
With this important fact pointed out, the interim design standards for multifamily only buildings proposed
last week by staff are irrelevant for 13132. In the council agenda document, interim design standards for
multifamily only buildings in the 13132 zone, prepared by Michael Clugston of the planning division for
tonight's meeting, clarify that 13132 cannot be multifamily only. Under the narrative on page 2, it refers to
the 13132 zone, "where commercial development is intended to be the primary use," then describes mixed
use as "a building with multiple dwelling units above ground floor commercial" and "a more measured
approach would be appropriate for these transitional BD2 mixed commercial properties."
Ms. Brewer noted there are no transitional BD2 mixed commercial properties and there is nothing in the
code that refers to transitional BD2 properties. As stated in the document, commercial development is
intended to be the primary use of 13132 and commercial is required to be on the ground floor. This is a
clear effort by staff to rezone and she urged council to reject staff s attempt to allow multifamily only
buildings in the 13132 zone by claiming there are transitional properties that do not have to abide by 13132
code. She concluded it is imperative that the City support code that protects business in 13132. If the intent
is a thriving downtown, there needs to be a thriving commercial district. If staff is allowed to convert lots
to 100% residential, valuable commercial space will be lost forever. Instead of converting or rezoning,
businesses in the BD zone need to be maintained, expanded and promoted. She urged the council to
promote business by ensuring staff adhere to the code. She recommended extending the moratorium and
clarifying the design standards and code to ensure what is built is good for the community, not just for the
developer.
Finis Tupper, Edmonds, shared his concerns with the interim zoning moratorium for the 13132 zone. The
growth management act and local project act clearly require public participation when amending City
land use plans, development regulations and project review. All parties should be informed, consulted,
involved and empowered. It is impossible to accomplish these effective procedural requirements in a
closed meeting that is not open to the public. The public cannot understand the council's actions when
decisions are made privately with just the city attorney and city staff. This interim ordinance created
controversy and distrust because the governing body failed to explain their reasons for passing the motion
or the interim ordinance. It appears to the public that the city council took this action and made a decision
in a closed meeting, without the public's involvement or participation. There seems to be confusion by the
planning department about what types of development are allowed in the 13132 zone.
Mr. Tupper continued, instead of administering and implementing the zoning ordinances and complying
with the comprehensive plan, staff is requesting changes to those land use plans. Staffs testimony at last
week's meeting is inconsistent with the plain language in the code and in the comprehensive plan. Staff
and the city attorney are missing the legislative intent of the BD zone. He researched the ordinances,
council meeting minutes and agenda packets and did not find that the public and the city council were
informed that the BD zone was a transition zone allowing exclusively multifamily units. Edmonds is
divided into different zone districts, residential, commercial, and industrial for the purposes of
compatibility with surrounding uses and public health, safety and welfare. The BD2 zone restricts
multifamily units to the second floor or behind the first 45 feet of the street frontage of the building. He
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 9
Packet Pg. 332
8.2.e
hoped the council would continue the moratorium and get the public involved as required; the council
does not get to make decisions in closed meetings.
Stephen Cunliffe, Edmonds, said his comments have nothing to do with legality, regulations, or
restrictions so they may go down like a lead balloon in this environment, but they come from the heart
and are prompted by what he and his wife have seen of the architectural drawings proposed for this
development which is pivotal to the discussion. They moved to Edmonds last year after 15 years in Port
Townsend. Port Townsend is distinguished by an integrated community and a great deal of character,
character that is visually expressed by its buildings. They looked for a place to live on the east side of
Puget Sound and decided on Edmonds because of its character and sense of community. If buildings such
as the proposed building are allowed to be constructed close to the downtown, it will contribute to the
destruction of the community's character as expressed in buildings. He questioned why building that
would be perfectly acceptable elsewhere but that did not suit or fit in this area would be allowed. As his
comments were not qualitative, he will rely on the experts to take his input and hopefully make it happen.
Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, commented there was slander and there was HIPPA. She questioned
whether a mayor who broke their legs or a pregnant councilmember who required bedrest would be
kicked off the council. Councilmember K. Johnson is not required to tell anyone her personal business
nor does HIPPA require it. She objected to the comments about Councilmember K. Johnson, equating it
to a Zoom bomb. She supported the person's comments about Highway 99, but not attacking a
councilmember. Mayor Pro Tem Olson interrupted, advising this was a public hearing on the BD zone,
not audience comment.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, said she 100% supports transparent processes and that decisions should not be
made behind closed doors. With regard to zoning and density, the downtown has a 12:1 ratio of parks in
comparison to SR-99 and south Edmonds. The growth management act would have density decided in
conjunction with resources, but that is not the historic pattern of the City. Mayor Pro Tem Olson
interrupted, advising this was public hearing about the BD zone and the moratorium, not the PROS Plan.
Ms. Seitz said she was getting to that point. Density needs to be sited in conjunction with resources. The
moratorium to not allow more density downtown is problematic because of the way the City has sited
resources. She was fine with whatever design standards the downtown community wants as long as the
density functionally goes there because that is functionally where all the resources are.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Olson closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM ON THE BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 UNTIL APRIL 21, 2022.
Councilmember Tibbott explained this would give council additional time to consider public comments
made tonight and to include those in the design standards the council will consider at a later date. It is
obvious from the comments received tonight and over the last few weeks that the council is not ready to
make a decision on the design standards. He wanted an opportunity to consider the comments before
making a decision so it was appropriate to extend the moratorium.
Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis expressed support for extending the moratorium, although she
preferred to extend it longer. She has all the back data regarding how the BD zones started. She has
always been a strong supporter of the business commercial area, recalling the Roger Brooks days and the
days of having a strong core downtown to promote a gathering place. She has had issues with how this
has played out, such as not recognizing what a true BD zone is. She recommended the council step back
and do its homework because this could have a tremendous impact on the downtown area. Ten small
businesses in the downtown area will be displaced and it will result in density creep. She envisioned the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 10
Packet Pg. 333
8.2.e
same thing happening to another building across the street where there are small businesses. She is a
strong believer in the downtown core and supports working through this properly because the way this
has been handled has been upsetting and emotional for many people and she does not have enough
information to make a decision.
Councilmember Paine said she had envisioned this could be resolved tonight. She asked how long it
would take to complete the multifamily design standards. Development Services Director Susan
McLaughlin answered there is a work plan for the multifamily design standards; the staff person assigned
to that work resigned and the City is recruiting for that position. Ideally that body of work would be
completed by the end of the year. Depending on staff recruitment, a consultant may be used to expedite
the process. Councilmember Paine summarized they would be completed in approximately nine months.
Ms. McLaughlin agreed. Councilmember Paine commented the City cannot have a moratorium because it
is very damaging for development and business and conveys unreliability to developers. She did not
envision adding two weeks would be beneficial when the multifamily design standards for the entire
community to consider and comment on would not be available for nine months. Nine months will be at
the end of the year which is a chaotic time to start something.
Councilmember Paine asked the harm to the practice of development if the council delayed the
moratorium. She recalled the last time there was a moratorium, a developer decided not to do a
multifamily project and instead built three homes which caused a lot of environmental damage in a
different business district. She asked staff to comment on the pros and cons of maintaining a moratorium
or concluding this with the proposed interim standards. Ms. McLaughlin said she could only speculate on
behalf of developers regarding the detrimental effect of a moratorium, but in her professional experience,
developers expect a level of confidence in codes. She realized tonight there was an interpretation issue
and staff would be happy to provide that interpretation, the history and the conclusion. These interim
design standards were proposed not because the use of particular properties was debated, but to ensure
excellence in design standards for solely multifamily buildings, recognizing it was a need. It was
consistent with the comprehensive plan to provide multifamily downtown.
Ms. McLaughlin speculated the longer a moratorium is extended, the less confidence it would seem there
is from the development community. The recommendation is to extend the moratorium to April 21; staff
has already done a thorough interpretation and have that information ready to share. That was part of
staff s due diligence for reviewing one of the projects that this is subject to; staff would not have
proceeded with that project and advancing it to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) if they were not
confident in its use. If the issue is the use, staff can bring that information forward tonight or next week.
Councilmember Paine relayed she was on vacation last week, but had watched the video. If there was
information that was not shared last week, she would like to see it. Ms. McLaughlin said Kernen Lien, the
interim planning manager and planner on the 6' & Main project, did the due diligence for that project in
particular but it applies to all BD zones and is relevant to this discussion.
A councilmember raised a point of order. Mayor Pro Tern Olson ruled that the information could be
provided because it was peripherally related to the moratorium.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order, stating the public hearing was related to
extension of the moratorium. The information staff is offering is related to Item 8.1 regarding design
standards. She agreed the staff recommendation regarding this agenda item was incorrect, it should have
been related to whether or not to extend the moratorium. Mayor Pro Tern Olson ruled this is in order
because whether or not multifamily is allowed is relevant to whether the moratorium should be continued
or not.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 11
Packet Pg. 334
8.2.e
Audience members attempted to speak to the council. Mayor Pro Tem Olson said the council is
discussing whether the moratorium for the BD2 related to interim design standards specifically for
multifamily is to be continued or not.
Mr. Lien began his presentation regarding the history of the BD zones, explaining the original BD zone
ordinance was adopted in 2007 and there have been 8 amendments to the BD zones.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson recognized Councilmember K. Johnson who had her hand raised. Councilmember
K. Johnson said her virtual hand was ignored, so she raised her actual hand. Mayor Pro Tem Olson said
she had not been ignored, staff was speaking in response to a question about the relevance of proceeding
with this item. She offered to come back to Councilmember K. Johnson. Councilmember K. Johnson said
the council was off topic as they should be speaking to the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked for ruling from one of the parliamentarian whether the information from
staff was germane and appropriate. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said it was his understanding that one of
the reasons the council was interested in a possible extension of the moratorium was to determine whether
the use issues raised at the hearing needed to be resolved as part of this interim zoning ordinance or
whether the use issues did not need to be resolved now. It would seem in order for the council to
determine whether there is a use issue as addressed by the public that warrants an extension of the
moratorium, the council may want to hear from staff regarding their interpretation of the zoning
ordinance. Council does not have to agree with staff but they may want to at least listen to staff. He
concluded hearing staff s understanding of the use issues would be relevant to determining to what extent
an extension of the moratorium is necessary.
Mr. Lien continued his presentation, advising three of the BD ordinances (shaded below) were relevant to
the discussion regarding multifamily use in the BD2 zone:
• BD Ordinance History
o Ord. 3624 -Original BD Zone Adoption (Jan 2007)
o Ord. 3700 -First Designated Street Front (Nov 2008)
o Ord. 3865 -Revised Designated Street Front (Dec 2011)
o Ord. 3894 -Interim Ord. for Farmers Markets (Sep 2012)
o Ord. 3902 -Food Trucks (Sep 2012)
o Ord. 3918 -Design Standards and Building Step back (Apr 2013)
o Ord. 3932 -Farmers Markets (July 2013)
o Ord. 3955 -BD1 GFSF (Jan 2014)
o Ord. 4190 -Parking (Feb 2019)
• Map of Pre BD Zoning - downtown was all BC
• Map of 5 BD Zones
Designated Street Front
o Ord. 3700 -BD1 Zone 30-foot Depth
■ Map only applied to BD 1 zone
■ BD zone designated street front 30-feet in depth
■ Zoning text -"for all other BD zones the designated street front is established as the first
60 feet of the lot measured perpendicular to any street right-of-way, excluding alleys."
o Ord. 3865 -Revised 2011
Designated street front mapped for all BD zones
45 feet from mapped designated street front
Reviewed by Planning Board and Economic Development Commission
- "The purpose of the map is to clarify where the primary pedestrian areas and
commercial uses are intended to be oriented within the BD Zones." (Rob Chave, PB
Public Hearing, 2011.06.08)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 12
Packet Pg. 335
8.2.e
- "He reminded the Board that multi -family residential and professional offices would
be allowed to locate on the portions of ground floor space located outside of the
designated street front areas and on the upper floors of all building in the BD zones."
(Rob Chave, PB Public Hearing, 2011.06.08)
Residential Use - BD1 GFSF
o Revisions to the BD1 uses under Ord. 3955 where lead by Stephen Clifton (former Economic
Development Director)
o Focus was on clarifying uses allowed within the BD 1 Ground Floor Store Front
o The MF restriction in the use table was supposed to be a footnote:
■ Excerpt from PB Minutes 09/11/2013: Board Member Lovell requested an explanation of
how the proposal would impact a property owner's ability to provide multi -family
residential uses. Mr. Clifton answered that residential uses would not be allowed within
the areas designated as BD1 GFSF. However, residential uses would be allowed behind
the 45-foot street front spaces and in the upper floors. Mr. Chave suggested that it might
be helpful to add a reference in the footnote to the applicable chapter in the code to
provide more clarity.
■ Rather than a footnote, that clarification was added to the use table, but the intent was
that it only applied to the BD1 zone
Mr. Lien said when working through the entirety of the BD zones, it is clear that commercial area is only
applied to the designated street front. All the discussion about the commercial ground floor and 45 feet is
in regard to that designated street front map. That is how staff reached the interpretation that an entirely
multifamily building could be located in the BD2 zone outside of the designated street front.
Councilmember Paine thanked staff for that clarification, relaying it was good to hear the history. She
observed the last time this was discussed was 9 years ago in 2013. Having worked with some community
groups who pay close attention to the BD1 and all the business district zoning, she was very familiar with
the BD 1 restrictions but it was good to have the historical context.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the history as it provided him knowledge for making a
decision. Based on this interpretation, he asked the definition for today's BD2 code, whether or not it
allowed residential. Mr. Lien answered it could be residential only outside the designated street front.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson referred to staffs indication that Ordinance 3955 was for BD1 only, but the other
BD zones preexisted this ordinance so when it said BD 1 that was not the only BD zone. Mr. Lien
answered the revisions in Ordinance 3955 were focused on the BD1 retail only and the intent of the
ordinance was to clarify the retail uses allowed in the BD1 zone because the uses in the table weren't
clear. He referred to the use table in 16.43.030 where a new column was added with this ordinance and
several new uses listed to clarify retail uses that were allowed in the downtown retail core, the BD 1 zone.
In reading the description of Ordinance 3 95 5, it is clear the focus was only on BD1 zone.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson said in just reading the code and not having all the background available, it was
very reasonable for people to reach the conclusion they did and she had a difficult time getting over that
interpretation. She asked how many times staff has approved projects that follow this interpretation of
multifamily allowed on the bottom floor on undesignated street fronts. Mr. Lien answered two building
have been constructed with residential uses within an undesignated street front; one building was
multifamily only at the corner of 3' & Edmonds within the BD2 zone where there is no designated street
front and the other was phase 1 of the post office site. For the building where the post office is located,
the designated street front went halfway down the block from Main Street. Where the post office is
located is a designated street front and there is commercial on the first floor; the other half of the building,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 13
Packet Pg. 336
8.2.e
north of the post office, is all residential on the ground floor because it is outside the designated street
front. Those are the only two projects outside the designated street fronts since the BD code was adopted.
Mayor Pro Tern Olson said as someone who goes to DEMA and Chamber meetings, it seems that
everybody is always looking for more commercial space. This was concerning to her especially when
other people may look at the code and see that it is not allowed and may not be pursuing those things. She
concluded it was another reason for extending the moratorium for two weeks, to give the council time to
digest that.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO
TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM TO MAY 17, 2022.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she feels additional time is needed and two weeks may not be sufficient.
There seems to be real confusion by the public and perhaps by council about what is a designated street
front, whether it applies to this application and what conditions the council needs to consider changing to
make the BD2 code more palatable.
Councilmember L. Johnson said given the explanation provided by staff showing how multifamily only is
allowed and given that there is a moratorium based on an emergency situation and to allow staff time to
create interim design standards to address gaps in codes that apply to sites, it appears staff has provided
interim design standards and explained how it came about that multifamily only is allowed in certain
portions of the BD2 zone outside the designated street front map. She was challenged with determining
how this would be considered an emergency to continue the moratorium as it appears the reasons that the
council initially adopted the moratorium have been satisfied. Mr. Taraday answered he agreed with the
analysis that Mr. Lien provided in terms of how to interpret the existing zoning code, but wanted to
underscore a couple of the points Mr. Lien made to ensure the council digests them. It would be a
roundabout way of answering Councilmember L. Johnson's question.
Mr. Taraday continued, from the adoption of Ordinance 3700 until the adoption of Ordinance 3865, a four
year period from 2008 to 2011, an entirely residential building could not have been allowed anywhere in
the BD2 zone. In 2011 when Ordinance 3865 was adopted, a revision was made to the definition of
designated street front. The map is expanded but the effect is to leave small pockets of the BD zone where
there is no designated street front. It used to be there was designated street front everywhere in the BD
zone due to the text. With the map amendment, it looks like it is being expanded because the map gets
bigger, but because of the text change, the actual effect is to remove the designated street front from
certain portions of the BD zone. The effect of Ordinance 3865 is there can be entirely residential
buildings in pockets of the BD zone that do not have a designated street front. That was the case without a
doubt from 2011 until 2014 when Ordinance 3955 was adopted. He understood that the way the table was
developed in Ordinance 3955 created some confusion.
Mr. Taraday agreed with Mr. Lien when looking at the totality of code and the totality of the ordinances
that it does not appear that when the city council adopted Ordinance 3955 in 2014 that it intended to undo
the change made in 2011. There was no discussion of that, there is no mention of it in the whereas
clauses; it seems to have been entirely focused on BD1 uses. In response to Councilmember L. Johnson's
question about whether to extend the moratorium, he said there is potentially some value in a short
extension because he had not had enough time to research whether the council understood in 2011 that
there would be pockets where an entirely residential structure would be allowed and whether it was
intended or was it an unintended consequence of the text change. That is relevant because in the same
way that the design standards staff prepared were intended to fix an unintended consequence of the code,
if it appears after studying the minutes, video and discussion that it was an unintended consequence of
Ordinance 3865, the council could justify taking a crack at fixing that unintended consequence in the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 14
Packet Pg. 337
8.2.e
same way it was fixing the design standards because the design standards did not apply to an entirely
residential structure.
Mr. Taraday continued, Mr. Lien did a great job explaining it tonight, but with an additional two weeks
staff could put it in writing for the public to review and understand and there might be more information
about what was really known and intended with Ordinance 3865. He acknowledged that after doing all
this additional research, staff may return and say there wasn't discussion about the pockets of BD that do
not have designated street fronts and the ramifications of that and then the council would need to decide
what to do about that. He hoped this information was helpful to explain why a short extension of the
moratorium would be appropriate. He did not think staff needed until May 17', that was more time than
staff needed to put this explanation together in comprehensive way.
Councilmember L. Johnson clarified that given the information provided, it rises to the level justifying the
emergency definition to continue it until April 22nd. Mr. Taraday answered yes, because depending on
what the additional research reveals, it is possible the council could be justified in doing something that
addresses this designated street front situation.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis said she just received all this information which should have been
in the packet. Ordinance 3918, amending chapter 16.43 and 22.43 ECDC relating to the development
relationship and design standards for downtown business zones, actually explains the zones and
subdistricts: BD1 downtown retail, BD2 downtown mixed commercial, BD3 downtown convenience
commercial, BD4 downtown mixed residential and BD5 downtown arts corridor and defines each BD
zone. She has at least four other ordinances and did not know where this fits with the three that were
highlighted. She believed more time was needed because in reading Ordinance 3918 which has not been
rescinded, there is no way it is legal to have an apartment complex in a BD2 zone. There are other
ordinances that are not being addressed such as Ordinance 3628.
Councilmember Paine said after hearing all the background, once further research was done by the city
attorney and all the BD ordinance history was provided, she felt it was premature to extend the
moratorium to May and that two weeks would be more than adequate. She was not in favor of extending
the moratorium to May.
Councilmember Chen relayed staff said two weeks was enough time to develop the documented
explanation so the public and the council can have a better understanding of this issue. He preferred to
extend the moratorium to April 215i and revisit it if necessary.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented moratoriums have serious business impacts and because there is no
certainty that more than a two week extension is necessary, she will vote no on the amendment and
support the original two week extension.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN,
TIBBOTT, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING NO.
Mr. Taraday restated the motion:
TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE HE CIRCULATED BEFORE THE MEETING, THE TITLE IS:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE
MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2
ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY
ORDINANCE 4247.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed that was the intent of his motion.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 15
Packet Pg. 338
8.2.e
Councilmember K. Johnson asked if the intent was to extend the moratorium to Tuesday, April 191}i or
Thursday, April 21". Mr. Taraday said the ordinance states April 21'. He did that intentionally not
knowing what may be on the April 19t' agenda, and he wanted to provide additional time in the event the
council needed to adjourn meeting to another night that week to finish its business.
MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE
BD2 ZONE
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order, stating this should not have been as part of
the agenda due to extending the moratorium. Mayor Pro Tern Olson said it was relevant because the
council may want to give input to staff for further work in order to move quickly past moratorium. Mr.
Taraday agreed from a parliamentary standpoint, it was not out of order. It is on the agenda and with only
a short extension of the moratorium, it would be helpful for staff to receive feedback from the council
sooner rather than later. Mayor Pro Tern Olson suggested limiting the discussion to feedback regarding
how it could be improved.
Senior Planner Mike Clugston offered to provide last week's PPT again or just proceed to council
discussion/questions.
Councilmember L. Johnson said given the information the council heard earlier, it would be beneficial to
have a shortened presentation.
Mr. Clugston reviewed Interim Design Standards of Stand-alone multifamily building in BD2 zone,
explaining the intent of the interim design standards was to apply them to the parcels on the edge of the
BD2 zone outlined in red on the map that do not have a designated street front:
ti Designated 51reet Front A,'r
S LEY ST DA LEY ST
ST z
W ��L
y Y S7 2
j � W BELL 5T
9
FS
p
eqz I�eo
❑AYTO aoa n L
N �
h- Maf'i.E Si
ALDER ST
> 9DZ Q
4 a ALDER - ST
wALRUT 5T~'
WALNUT
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 16
Packet Pg. 339
8.2.e
Standards are intended to apply to two situations
1. Property is adjacent to R-zoned property, and/or
2. Property is adjacent to other BD2 property
Proposed design standards
o Materials
■ Benefits
- Breaks up massing; strengthens identity
- Preferred exterior materials: natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass
- Manmade okay if made to look like preferred
- Photos of projects using more traditional building materials
o Street -side amenity space
■ Benefits
- Results in setback to the street to serve as amenity space
- Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience
- Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity
■ Plan view - Street -side Amenity Space
- 5% of lot area must be provided
- Shall be between building and sidewalk only and open to sky
- Must include landscaping, seating, art, etc.
■ Section Cut - Street Facing
- Street -side amenity space area excludes any private amenity space area that is
provided at the front of the building
- Canopy/awnings required and does not impact amount of street -side amenity area
o Private amenity space
■ Benefits
- Improves livability for smaller residential units
- Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to align with building
character, orientation and style
- Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the fagade and increases
`eyes on the street' thereby improving safety
Plan View - Private Amenity Space
- 10% project area
- Balconies, decks, patios, yards
- Together with a dwelling unit or grouped for resident use
- If with individual units, > 40 sf
- 50% of required area can be achieved with a roof top deck
Section Cut - Adjacent Property
- Balconies can project 5' into setback from R-zone property
- Decks and patios 10'
Councilmember Paine said she did not have any trouble with most of the interim design standards, but
wanted to understand the impact of removing CA, "A maximum of 50% of the required private amenity
space may be provided as roof top deck. Deck railings may...". Mr. Clugston answered it would limit the
ability of designers to provide private amenity space. They could probably do it in other ways such as a
recessed balcony. The intent is to use the roof top as a gathering space for residents. Similar features are
allowed to exceed the height in all zones such as elevator penthouses, chimneys, etc. This is an example
of what could be on a roof top in a dense downtown area.
Councilmember Paine said amenity space that was not on the roof would provide articulation and
modulation on the building sides so it wasn't a giant mass and such a square. Grooves provide sightlines,
a square does not. Having a roof top deck seems to shift that visual so it is not really community friendly.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 17
Packet Pg. 340
8.2.e
Mr. Clugston said that is an option; other zones in Edmonds such as the General Commercial and
Westgate Mixed Use allow roof top decks. Councilmember Paine said she was open to considering it in
the multifamily design standards that will have a public process, but preferred to have the standards be
tighter now and be more generous when there was a public process.
Ms. McLaughlin said she could understand what Councilmember Paine was saying about having it be
part of the required private amenity space and asked if she would be opposed to allowing roof top amenity
space after they had met their standards. For instance, if the developer already met their private amenity
space per the interim design standards and chose to do a roof top deck, would that be allowed.
Councilmember Paine said she do not know how she felt about that, she has the square in her head. Ms.
McLaughlin said that would be solved via the private amenity space; it was her understanding
Councilmember Paine did not want the roof top deck to count toward that because she wanted further
articulation. She could see that point of view but wanted to clear whether the desire was to prohibit roof
top decks. Councilmember Paine said visual examples would be helpful. She hoped to avoid a block with
people partying on top of the building.
Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with idea of maintaining the private amenity space and once that has
been met, whether there is a roof top deck is inconsequential to the design standard.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis agreed with Councilmembers Paine and K. Johnson. She did not
want people hanging out on decks, hanging over and looking and waving at people down on Main Street.
There is nothing in the code that says decks on a roof top are considered open space. She wanted to be
conscientious of that and not turn into Seattle where people hang out on decks waving at everybody
walking by. She referred to a statement last week that a traffic analysis had been done, but now staff
indicates no traffic analysis had been done and that it would come later. Ms. McLaughlin said at the last
council meeting there was a question regarding the project development process for this particular project,
specifically what types of studies are requested during project review and a traffic study was one of the
questions. Traffic is typically evaluated in any project; in this project, which is not the subject of tonight's
review, the traffic analysis yielded less than 25 PM peak hour trips. When a preliminary traffic analysis
results in less than 25 PM peak hour trips, a full traffic study is not required because the impacts per hour
on the street network are negligible.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis questioned 25 peak hour trips with the addition of at least 24 cars.
Ms. McLaughlin answered international transportation engineering guidelines guide trip generation
analysis. Public Works leads this process and the engineering team can provide more detail. It is a very
standardized methodology for determining peak hour trips in different types of land use.
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to Ordinance 3918 which is very explanatory about the
design standards in BD zones but doesn't say anything about roof top decks. Mr. Clugston said he would
need to look at the code and report back. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis asked if staff had spoken
to the developer regarding mixed use versus fully residential since it is in a 13132 zone. Mr. Clugston
answered this is a discussion on interim design standards for buildings in the BD2 zone.
Councilmember Chen referred to an area outlined in red south of Main and east of 6' on the map of
designated street fronts and areas without designated street fronts. He asked if the Bellmont Building at
600 Bell was in the BD2 zone. Mr. Clugston answered that is in a multifamily zone.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked about the design standards and allowances for roof top decks or if the
interim standards were allowing something that did not currently exist. She preferred to have that go
through the more lengthy process with the overall multifamily design standards. She was concerned with
adding something like that through these interim design standards if it did not already exist.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 18
Packet Pg. 341
8.2.e
Councilmember Tibbott said he was interested in the purpose of transition zones. There are very intensive
uses in BD1, less intensive uses in BD3 and BD2 seems to be somewhat of a transition between those
two. He asked the purpose of a transition zone and what the difference would be between mixed use and a
mix of uses in BD2. Ms. McLaughlin answered the term transition zone is something that has used in
staff s presentations. As the public mentioned, it is not found in the zoning code. In her professional
judgment, transitional zones are meant to taper out the intensity of a mix of uses that are often found in a
downtown core. It affords a larger variety for developers to choose from with regard to market demand.
There is a typology that is more suited to a higher density retail core for in downtown core for mixed use
buildings. With regard to a mix of uses, tapering away from the retail core, it allows for a variety of uses
that still support, as stated in the comprehensive plan, the intensity that happens in the core and supports
the retail and commercial uses by providing residences and other uses that help keep that space lively and
vibrant.
Councilmember Tibbott referred to the photographs on packet page 107 of the North Sound Center and
the post office building that have modulation and articulation in the rooflines and the sides. He asked staff
to address how the articulation and design features help with good design for the City. Mr. Clugston said
these buildings illustrate human scale. The lower buildings on Main Street are only 15' tall so they
definitely have human scale but the Starbucks building on the corner and the post office buildings are
definitely not monolithic blocks, they have elements that provide modulation, different eaves, etc. The
Graphite building also has a lot going on and even on the North Sound building, there is modulation using
colors, materials and windows to create human scale.
Councilmember Tibbott said the proposed interim design standards for BD2 would be in line with this
kind of modulation and natural materials and would help tie all the BD zones to downtown. Mr. Clugston
agreed that was the intent. Ms. McLaughlin advised the proposed interim design standards would be used
in combination with the existing design standards that talk about mimicking historic patterns, human
scale, etc. and would not be used in isolation. The whole package of applicable design standards are in the
council packet.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson said if a roof top deck was included, she agreed it should be recessed from the
edge so people could not look into windows on surrounding buildings, that was good input from the
architect during the public hearing. She will listen to that public comment again to ensure she considered
everything that was mentioned. She encouraged staff to consider that comment and other comments from
the public. If councilmembers objected to the idea of a roof top deck, she suggested perhaps it could be
allowed with a conditional use permit so the surrounding residents could weigh in.
Councilmember Tibbott said it was clear from the council's discussion that clearer design standards were
needed for a roof top deck. He asked what happened if a design was proposed that did not meet the design
standards. Mr. Clugston said the developer would be sent back to the drawing board. Councilmember
Tibbott asked if the proposal would be denied. Mr. Clugston said when staff or the ADB is reviewing a
project, the goal is not to deny but to get them to something that is code compliant that also meets the
design guidance in the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Tibbott summarized they would need to
meet the design standards before it was approved for construction. Mr. Clugston answered yes, or before
it was conditionally approved.
2. 2022 PROS PLAN DRAFT REVISION PROPOSAL
Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Human Services Director Angie Feser said the final draft PROS Plan
is currently under council consideration for approval. After robust public engagement and considerable
public comment since the January 7t1i draft release, the plan is in its last stage of council review and
revision. Usually in this phase council has the option of approving the final draft as recommended by the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2022
Page 19
Packet Pg. 342
Interim Design Standards for
Stand -Alone Multifamily Buildings
in the BD2 zone
Michael Clugston, Senior Planner
Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director
Edmonds City Council
March 29, 2022
Moratorium Ordinance 4247:
"The purpose of this moratorium is to allow the City
adequate time to draft interim zoning regulations for the BD2
zone that would change the required setback for properties
that do not front on a Designated Street Front."
This was NOT a comprehensive look at the BD zones or
multifamily design standards
Downtown Businec
Zones
BD1 — Retail Core
BD2 — Mixed Commercial
BD3 — Convenience Commercial
BD4 — Mixed Residential
BD5 —Arts Corridor
W7
Ik
7
Designated Street
Front Standards
-Commercial and mixed -use buildings
-45-foot depth of ground floor comme
-Floor height minimums
-Transparency and access at sidewal
-Detail at ground level
-Multifamily allowed behind 45 feet or
above
BD2 Parcels withou
Designated Street
Front
Y_
��I I I Ili ��■ice i��i�� Have to address two situations
where project is adjacent to R-zoned
property and/or where it is adjacent t
other BD2DrODertv
Comprehensive Plan:
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center
Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential a
office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for
central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporter
commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasi
plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas.
EA Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial,
and cultural activities.
Comprehensive Plan:
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center
Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal F. Focus development between the commercial and retc-
core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi -family
residential uses
Comprehensive Plan:
Downtown Design Goals and Policies
-Vehicular Access and Parking
-Pedestrian Access and Connections
-Building Setbacks
-Building/Site Identity
-Massing
Proposed Design Standards
-Materials
-Street-side Amenity Space
-Private Amenity Space
Ir
PPI
i North Sound Center ► +
+ TWW
s-
s� AIM
Materials
-Breaks up massing;
strengthens identity
-Preferred exterior
materials: natural ston
wood, architectural mE
brick, and glass
-Man-made ok if madE
look like preferred
R
M
1
� f �
r
r
moll.
�LL l
V
H�1 •r
it -AM
ri
., i
.I1% Y•L ,��
- rA,
4 Y r
i_
AM
SrAOFFEE STAP. J7
Wes_.
y�.
c.. r' �.► i�N� l t
Benefits of Street -side Amenity Space
-Results in a setback to the street to serve as amenity spacE
-Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience
-Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity
....
MOEN
No"
Street -side
Amenity Space
-5% of lot area must be provid
-Shall be
between
building
ani
sidewalk
only
and
open
to
sky
-Must include landscaping,
seating, art, etc.
SECTION CUT - STREET -FACING
8.2.f
30 ft. max
12 °1 mw
AREA
Amenity
eet-side
Space
:t-side amenity
space
area
des any private
amenity
space
that is provided
at the
front of
gilding
spy/awnings required
and does
ipact amount
of street
-side
pity area
=I
Packet Pg. 356
Benefits of Private Amenity Space
-Improves livability for smaller residential units
-Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to C'"
with building character, orientation and style
-Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the
facade and increases `eyes on the street' thereby improving sa
PLAN VIEW - PRIVATE AMENITY SPACE
8.2.f
ROW LINE
6 FT. MIN. FENCE
SCREENING
50% MAX OF
AMENITY SPACE
AS ROOFTOP
-PRIVATE
AMENITY SPACE
= 40 SQ. FT. MIN.
u
v
n
a
A
U
Y
Nrlvate Am
Space
.y
O
E
N
N
CD
N
CO)
C
O
c�
C
d
N
d
L
a
E
L
c
r
CO)
c
LM .N
d
G
E
c
c0
t
K
W
5 ft. min. 15 ft. min.
setback setback Packet Pg. 358
PLAN VIEW - PRIVATE AMENITY SPACE
8.2.f
ROW LINE
6 FT. MIN. FENCE
SCREENING
50% MAX OF
AMENITY SPACE
AS ROOFTOP
-PRIVATE
AMENITY SPACE
= 40 SQ. FT. MIN.
u
v
n
a
A
U
Y
Nrlvate Am
Space
.y
O
E
N
N
CD
N
CO)
C
O
c�
C
d
N
d
L
a
E
L
c
r
CO)
c
LM .y
d
E
c
c0
t
K
W
5 ft. min. 15 ft. min.
setback setback Packet Pg. 359
8.2.f
SECTION CUT - ADJACENT PROPERTY
0
v
M
30 ft_ max
12 ft. min.
�Jrfvate Am
Space
Packet Pg. 360
�0 U
�0319MIA
Downtown Mixed Residential
IIIINIII! If mixed -use project, no
ICI■i
r � ��:f�����■ setbacks — if MF only, RM-1 .5
ON setbacks apply
3 large sites w/o Designated
Street Front
RM setback not appropriate for
�� BD2 parcels
AN .11��1HrWm
8.2.g
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
April 13, 2022
City Council
Kernen Lien, Interim Planning Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
BD2 Zone Development within the Designated Street Front and
Legislative Intent
Multifamily Only Development in the BD2 Zone
The City Council has questioned whether the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
allows multifamily residential only buildings within the BD2 zone. Based on a complete reading
of Chapter 16.43 ECDC, staff and the city attorney have concluded that the current BD2 zoning
regulations allow multifamily residential only buildings in the areas of the BD2 zone that do not
front on the streets mapped as the designated street front.
According to ECDC 16.43.020 multifamily dwelling units are a permitted primary use within the
BD2 zone. While the use table is ambiguous by containing language that multiple dwelling units
"must be located on the second floor or behind the first 45 feet from the sidewalk or rights -of -
way" a complete reading of Chapter 16.43 ECDC and an analysis of its history (see below) make
it clear that the locational restriction in the use table should only apply to properties within the
BD1 zone. We do acknowledge, however, that this ambiguity should be eliminated with a
clarifying amendment in the near future.
16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1
Permitted Uses
BDl
GFD1
BD2
BD3
BD4
BDS
Residential
Single-family dwelling
A
X
A
A
A
A
Multiple dwelling unit(s) — must be located on second floor or behind first 45 feet
A
X
A
A
A
A
from sidewalk or rights -of -way
A = Permitted primary use
X = Not permitted
Page 1 of 13
Packet Pg. 362
8.2.g
(1) BD Zone GFSF— Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as
defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings setback 15 feet or more
from the sidewalk shall not be subject to the BD1 Zone GFSF requirements.
Within the use table there is a column for the BD1 GFSF which specifically prohibits the
multifamily dwelling units within the BD1 GFSF. Footnote one under the table defines the BD1
GFSF as the Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-
of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code
Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones.
Footnote 3 under the development standards table ECDC 16.43.030.A Table 16.43-2 specifically
acknowledges that there may be an entirely residential building in the BD zones and when those
are located in the BD4 zone, the must apply the RM-1.5 setbacks. If the "must be located ..."
language in the table were intended to apply to all BD zones, instead of just BD1, this footnote
could not be reconciled with the table, because it would not be possible to have an entirely
residential building in the BD4 zone.
All the ground floor discussions in Chapter 16.43 ECDC are related to the area that is within the
designated street front. ECDC 16.43.030.13.1 provides:
For all BD zones, the ground floor is considered to be that floor of a building which is closest
in elevation to the finished grade along the width of the side of the structure that is
principally oriented to the designated street front of the building (this is normally the
adjacent sidewalk). For the purposes of this section, the ground "floor" is considered to be
the sum of the floor planes which, in combination, run the full extent of the building and are
closest in elevation to one another. For the purposes of this chapter, the definition of "ground
floor" contained in ECDC 21.35.017 does not apply.
ECDC 16.43.030.13.2 further elaborates on the designated street front:
Designated Street Front. Map 16.43-1 shows the streets that define the designated street
front for all properties lying within the BD zones. The designated street front is defined as the
45 feet measured perpendicular to the street front of the building lot fronting on each of the
mapped streets. (Map 16.43-1 provided on next page).
Subsections of ECDC 16.43.030.133 through 13.6 include restrictions that pertain to development
within the designated street front. ECDC 16.43.030.13.7 specifically address development within
the designated street front of the BD2 and BD3 zones noting:
Within the BD2 and BD3 zones, development on the ground floor shall consist of only
commercial uses within the designated street front. Any permitted use may be located on
the ground floor outside of the designated street front.
While the "must be located ..." language in the table has allowed some to argue that multi-
family residential is only a permitted use "on second floor or behind first 45 feet from sidewalk
Page 2 of 13
Packet Pg. 363
8.2.g
or rights -of -way," the source of that language (Ordinance 3955) and the other changes that
were made to the permitted use table at that time, strongly suggest that that limitation was not
intended to apply outside the BD1 zone. Therefore, where there is no designated street front,
the entire ground floor may allow any permitted use. Since multifamily development is a
permitted primary use according to ECDC 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1, properties within
the BD2, BD4 and BD5 zones that are outside of a designated street front may be entirely
residential (Note: There are no BD3 zone properties that do not contain at least some
designated street front).
Below is a review of the legislative history which provides support for this code interpretation
Page 3 of 13
Packet Pg. 364
8.2.g
Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones
Page 4 of 13
Packet Pg. 365
8.2.g
Ordinance No. 3624 (2007)
The first ordinance to establish the BD zones was Ordinance No. 3624. There was no reference
to a designated street front in the first version of the BD zones, but there are some hints as to
what was intended for use on the ground floor.
ECDC 16.43.030.B.1 (all code refences in this portion of the memo are to the version of the code
adopted in Ord. No. 3624) provided:
B. Ground Floor. This section describes requirements for development of the ground floor of
buildings in the BD zones.
1. When a commercial use is located on the ground floor, the elevation of the ground
floor and associated entry shall be within 7 inches of the grade level of the adjoining
sidewalk. "Grade" shall be as measured at the entry location.
The use of "when" suggests something other than commercial use could be used on the ground
floor. And, in fact, that appears to have been the case at least in BD5, and arguably in BD4.
ECDC 16.43.030.B.3 further elaborated on ground floor commercial use noting:
3. Within the BD1 zone, development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial
uses. Within the BD2, and BD3 zones, development on the ground floor shall consist
of only commercial uses to a minimum building depth of 60 feet, as measured from
the street front of the building.
In Ordinance 3624, BD1 is required to be all commercial uses on the ground floor, but in the BD2
and BD3 zones, only the first 60 feet were required to be commercial.
Regarding the BD4 zone, ECDC 16.43.030.B.4 provided additional flexibility. And footnote 3 of
ECDC 16.43.030.A expressly contemplates an "entirely residential building."
Similarly, the code relating to the BD5 zone and commercial space provides the option to provide
commercial as noted for the BD2 zone in ECDC 16.43.030.2, but provides more detail when that
cannot be met (orientation to the street and encouraging live/work type development).
Interim Ordinance No. 3691 (20
In 2008 there was a request for an official interpretation regarding ground floor commercial use
in the BD1 zone. The interpretation (2008-1 BD1 ground floor) was challenged, which lead to
further discussion on the ground floor use at city council. Upon review of the interpretation, City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 3691 and referred the matter to the Planning Board for
further review. Ordinance No. 3691 added new section ECDC 16.43.035 which provided:
Page 5 of 13
Packet Pg. 366
8.2.g
16.43.035 Application of requirements to the 1313-1 zone.
The application and interpretation of Chapter 16.43 BD Downtown Business to any
development permit or application within the BD-1 zone shall conform to the requirements
of this section. These requirements are enacted in order to clarify the intent of the City
Council and the application of existing language of the Code. In the event of conflict or
ambiguity with any provision of this chapter, or the definition sections of the Community
Development Code, these provisions shall control.
The ground floor of the development in the BD-1 zone shall be devoted entirely to
commercial uses as provided by the first sentence of ECDC 16.43.030(B)(3). The ground floor
shall be no less than fifteen feet in height measured in accordance with ECDC
16.43.030. Except to the minimum extent necessary to exercise the rights granted pursuant
to ECDC 16.43.030(B)(2)(b),1 the ground floor shall be in one plane, extending the entire
width and breadth of the building.
Discussions leading up to the adoption of this interim ordinance (07.15.2008, 07.22.2008)
focused on the ceiling height of the ground floor what could happen behind the commercial
space.
Ordinance No. 3700 (2008)
The Planning Boards review of the ground floor
commercial requirements forwarded to them by the
Council with Interim Ordinance No. 3691 resulted in
Ordinance No. 3700 and the first map of the
designated street front. While the map of the
designated street front only required properties
within the BD1 zone to have a 30 foot deep
designated street front, the language in the text of
the ordinance described a designated street front
throughout all of the BD zones. Ordinance No. 3700
also added clarification that for the purpose of the
"ground floor" requirements of the BD zones, this was
related to the finish grade along a designated street
front. ECDC 16.43.030.13 adopted by Ordinance No.
3700 provided:
Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front far Properties in the BDl Zane
r
.I--- !o 'IIIII ,
MEN Jo �� 1■1I
®' Designated Street Front (depth of 30 leetme-d perpendicular tc property line)
B. Ground Floor. This section describes
requirements for development of the ground floor of buildings in the BD zones.
1. For all BD zones, the ground floor is considered to be that floor of a building which is
closest in elevation to the finished grade along the width of the side of the structure
i ECDC 16.43.030(B)(2)(b) stated, at that time, as follows: "The building may be broken up into multiple frontages,
so that each entry /ground floor combination is within 7 inches of the grade of the sidewalk."
Page 6 of 13
Packet Pg. 367
8.2.g
that is principally oriented to the designated street front of the building ( this is o
normally the adjacent sidewalk). For the purposes of this section, the ground " floor" N
is considered to be the sum of the floor planes which, in combination, run the full -a
CU
extent of the building and are closest in elevation to one another. For the purposes of
this Chapter, the definition of "ground floor" contained in ECDC 21. 35. 017 does not N
apply. �,
2. Designated street front. Map .16. 43 - 1 shows the designated street front (emphasis U)
in the original) for all properties lying within the BD1 zone, which is 30 feet measured a
perpendicular to the indicated street front of the building lot. For all other BD zones,
the designated street front is established as the first 60 feet of the lot measured
perpendicular to any street right -of -way, excluding alleys. =
The final sentence of B.2, above is particularly important to understanding today's code because
it shows that, starting in 2008 (with Ordinance 3700), every BD zoned property had some form
of designated street front. (This would change in 2011.) Ordinance No. 3700 also added clarifying
language on what uses could occur outside of the designated street front. In ECDC 16.43.030.B.6
and B.7:
6. Within the BD 1 zone, development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial
uses, except that parking may be located on the ground floor so long as it is not located
within the designated street front.
7. Within the BD2 and BD3 zones, development on the ground floor shall consist of only
commercial uses within the designated street front. Any permitted use may be located
on the ground floor outside of the designated street front.
Properties within the BD1 are required to only be commercial use on the ground floor (with the
exception of parking behind the designated street front), while the BD2 and BD3 zones could
have any permitted use outside of the designated street front. Note that the permitted use table
in Ordinance 3700 identified "multiple dwelling units" as a "permitted primary use" in the BD2
zone. Hence, because every BD2 zoned property had a 60-foot-deep designated street front,
multiple dwelling units could not be located within that front 60-foot area of the ground floor.
That area had to be commercial.
Residential uses outside of the designated street front were explicitly discussed at the Planning
Board. Below is an excerpt from the August 13, 2008 Planning Board meeting:
Board Member Lovell summarized that the existing code requires that the entire ground floor
of a project in the BD1 zone be dedicated to commercial space. However, the BD2 and BD3
zones only require commercial space to a depth of 60 feet, measured from the front of a
building. Mr. Chave agreed that in the BD2 and BD3 zones, residential uses could be
constructed behind the 60 foot deep commercial area. The area could also be used for
parking space.
The Board agreed to move forward with a public hearing on this proposed amendment.
Page 7 of 13
Packet Pg. 368
8.2.g
L
• Clarify the uses allowed on the ground floor located behind the first 60 feet. Parking 0N
should be allowed behind the first 60 feet. In addition, the BD2 and BD3 zones should -a
continue to allow residential uses behind the first 60 feet.
Ordinance No. 3700 also clarified that the designated street front and the ground floor
requirements did not apply to corner lots at the edge of the BD1 district (Council minutes
10.21.2008). A discussion on this issue is captured in the Planning Board's September 10, 2008
meeting minutes: L-
E
5. Clarify that for corner lots, the 45-foot requirement noted above would not apply to
street fronts of buildings when they are located on side streets at the edge of the BD1 zone c
district. However, all street fronts along Main and 4th will always have the 45-foot
requirements applied, corner or not. This can be accomplished by means of a specific map
showing where the designated street front of each lot in the BD1 zone is located. N
Mr. Chave clarified that the 45-foot minimum depth requirement would not apply to street
fronts of buildings that are located on side streets of properties on the periphery of the BD1
zone. He displayed a map that was prepared by staff to identify where the 45-foot minimum
depth requirement would not be applied. Board Member Dewhirst said he is unclear as to
the intent behind this proposed amendment. If the properties at the corner of 6th Avenue
and Main Street and 5th Avenue and Walnut Street are not required to provide commercial
space on both street fronts, the City would be giving up the potential to provide good
commercial space in the downtown area. Mr. Chave expressed his belief that it would not be
necessary to require commercial space to loop around the corner at 6th Avenue and Main
Street, because 6th Avenue is not a well traveled commercial corridor. Board Member
Dewhirst disagreed. Mr. Chave noted that at 6th Avenue, once you get off of Main Street the
uses become more residential and office in nature. Board Member Dewhirst agreed that
office and residential uses exist today, but the Board must also keep in mind their desires for
the future. He noted that the residential developments would generate a lot of pedestrian
traffic past the corner of 6th Avenue and Main Street. Chair Guenther reminded the Board
that the Comprehensive Plan indicates the City's goal is to encourage retail and commercial
growth from the heart of the downtown to the waterfront. Mr. Chave agreed and said the
Comprehensive Plan also talks about connecting the commercial uses to the arts center on
4th Avenue.
Board Member Reed suggested, and the remainder of the Board concurred, that the
proposed amendment should be changed to make it clear that the provision would not apply
to properties on the western periphery of the BD1 zone since the goal is to encourage
connectively to the waterfront.
Note that the map ultimately adopted as part of Ordinance 3700 does not show a designated
street front on 6t" Avenue. So, the planning board and council appear to have agreed with Mr.
Chave on that point. But the map does show the designated street front wrapping around from
Page 8 of 13
Packet Pg. 369
8.2.g
Main Street onto V Avenue. This Planning Board discussion is important as we consider the
changes made subsequently under Ordinance No. 3865, because it was clearly understood at the
time that development requirements, even on the same parcel and within the same zone, would
depend on the mapped designated street front.
Upon return the City Council, the discussion focused on the appropriate depth of the designated
street front (10.21.2008 Council minutes).
Ordinance No. 3865 (2011)
On August 11, 2010, several topics related to the BD zones were discussed with the CS/DS Council
Committee. It was noted that that there were several items staff wished to initiate to clean up
in the existing downtown BD zones, such as the required depth of commercial uses, the zoning
requirements along the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor, and clarifying where the commercial street
frontages are outside of the BD1 zone (CS/DS minutes 08.11.2010). These matters were referred
to the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission for review. Many of the
discussions focused on the allowed uses within the BD1 zone, particularly what uses should be
allowed as retail. The analysis below focuses on discussions related to the designated street
front.
When the issue was introduced to the Planning Board, it was noted:
...the designated street fronts are mapped for the BD1 zones, but not for the other BD zones.
At this time, the BD1 zone has a 30 foot commercial depth requirement, while elsewhere
the requirement is 60 feet. Staff is recommending the provisions have a more consistent
framework. For example, the mapping should expand to cover other BD zones, and the
commercial depth requirement should not be greater in the BD zones outside of BD1. (PB
03.09.2011 minutes)
On introduction, the commercial depths requirements were identified for the different zones,
and the designated street front mapping change was described as an expansion. At the joint
meeting with the Planning and Economic Development Commission it was clarified that the
designated street front map identifies area where the commercial depth requirement would be
applicable:
Mr. Chave advised that the proposed amendments also include an update of the Designated
Street Front Map (Map 16.43-1), which identifies all designated street fronts within the BD
zones for which the commercial depth requirement would be applicable. He noted that the
map was originally adopted for the BD1 zone, but staff is recommending to include all BD
zones. (Joint PB/EDC 04.13.2011 minutes)
So, like the original mapping of the designated street front in Ord. 3700, it is recognized that the
commercial requirements only are required in the mapped designated street front. At the June
8, 2011 Planning Board public hearing it was noted that:
Page 9 of 13
0
CU
c
c
2
N
a)
0
E
c
Packet Pg. 370
8.2.g
L
Mr. Chave referred the Board to the proposed ma of Designated Street Fronts for BD Zones 0
p p p g N
(Map 16.43-1), which has been expanded to include all BD zones, not just the BD1 zone. The R
purpose of the map is to clarify where the primary pedestrian areas and commercial uses are c
intended to be oriented within the BD Zones. He explained that ground floor of properties N
along designated street fronts would be required to meet the commercial height and depth ai
requirements. U)
0
And...
c
He reminded the Board that multi -family residential and professional offices would be
allowed to locate on the portions of ground floor space located outside of the designated r
c
street front areas and on the upper floors of all buildings in the BD Zones. (06.08.2011 PB �,
minutes) r
On questioning a specific area on the map, it was noted if it were not mapped as designated
street front, the area is made available for other types of uses:
Chair Lovell referred to the proposed Designated Street Front Map (Map 16.43-1) and
recalled the Board previously discussed that a portion of the street front on 5th Avenue
between Howell Way and Erben Drive has a steep topography and is not really an ideal
location for retail uses. It was suggested that this area should not be designated as
commercial street front. Mr. Chave recalled this was discussed by the Board and the Citizens
Economic Development Commission (CEDC) at a joint meeting. He said staff recommends
that the designated street front extend all the way up 5th Avenue to the end of the BD3
zone. Otherwise, the area would be made available for other types of uses that are not
compatible with retail and/or commercial uses. (06.08.2011 PB Minutes).
This discussion of "other types of uses" being "made available" in the BD3 zone by virtue of a
possible map change demonstrates that the Planning Board was aware that other than
commercial uses would be permitted on properties outside of the designated street front and
that they considered what the appropriate extent of the designated street front map should be
given those possible "other types of uses."
More discussion on the designated street front occurred at the July 26, 2011 City Council
meeting, the minutes of which provide insight into the Council's understanding of the designated
street map. The following are excerpts from those minutes (pages 5 and 6 have the most helpful
passages):
Councilmember Petso referred to the identifying street fronts (page 111 of the packet) where
there is one parcel on 2nd Avenue extending north from Main Street that has the blue line
designating the street front on only a portion of the parcel. Mr. Chave explained when the
lines were drawn, consideration was given to commercial streets and the designated street
front were identified in areas where there are commercial uses on both sides or there is a
Page 10 of 13
Packet Pg. 371
8.2.g
long history of commercial use in the vicinity. The EDC and ultimately Planning Board may
reconsider the area south of 5th beyond Howell Way. In the core area the intent was to avoid
extending the designated street front along areas where there are significant residential
uses or wrapping around corners where there is commercial only on one side.
Councilmember Petso asked when this particular property at the corner of 2nd and Main
develops, will it be required to have a designated street front all the way along 2nd, part of
the way along 2nd or none of the way on 2nd. Mr. Chave advised in areas where there is not
a designated street front, the requirement for a 45 foot depth does not apply and any of
the uses allowed by the zone would be permitted.
On a property where hypothetically the blue line stopped in the middle of a parcel,
Councilmember Petso asked whether the parcel has a designated street front or only has a
designated street front as far as the blue line extends. Mr. Chave answered the designated
street front only extends as far as the blue line. If it splits a parcel, only the portion of the
parcel where the blue line is has a designated street front. The designated street fronts are
tied to street sections rather than property lines. (07.26.2011 Council Minutes)
Further on there is discussion on reasoning for the extent of the designated street front and that
ultimately it is a matter of legislative discretion:
Student Representative Gibson asked whether it would be fairer to everyone else if the blue
line extended through the entire property rather than stopping halfway through the
property. Mr. Chave answered the concept behind the designated street front is to identify
portions of downtown where there is the strongest commercial activity. There are certain
main pedestrian arterials, along Main, down 5th, and somewhat on Dayton, that tend to be
the main corridors. However, outside those main corridors, the question arises if commercial
is required, how far off the corridor commercial will it be viable. Especially in areas where
one side of the street is residential, requiring commercial on the opposite side lessens its
viability. When people walk down a commercial street, they like to see activity on both sides.
He summarized determining how far the requirement for commercial activity should extend
is a judgment call, the reason this is a legislative matter.
And...
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out the designated street front on 4th Avenue
extends to Daley Street although it is residential past Bell Street, yet on 2nd Avenue it is cut
off a block short of James and mid -block south of Bell. Mr. Chave answered beyond Dayton
there is a consistent block on the south side of 4th versus 3rd where there is only one large
building on the east side and only a small corner on the west side. He reiterated it is a
judgment call; the Council could revise the locations of the designated street fronts.
(07.26.2011 Council minutes)
Page 11 of 13
Packet Pg. 372
8.2.g
Testimony offered during the public hearing also sheds light on the council's understanding of L
the proposal before them. N
L
R
Doug Spee, Edmonds, a property owner in the downtown BD2 zone, acknowledged his
interest may be more personal than other speakers. He expressed support for the N
proposed amendment with regard to the designated street front; extending the
designated street front down Main Street to ensure a consistent look down Main and up
the side streets that cross Main but still allow flexibility on the outer portions of the
zoning that in some cases face a mixed residential zone. In his experience, renting
commercial space on the edges of the commercial zone is virtually impossible; he has
had a vacancy for four years. =
The minutes of the July 26, 2011 public hearing on Ordinance 3865 strongly suggest that the City
Council understood that non-commercial uses would be allowed, even in the front 45-feet of the
ground floor, outside of the designated street front. It was also made clear that this mapping was
a subjective exercise and that the Council had the legislative discretion to alter the designated
street front maps if it saw fit to do so.
The legislative intent of the adoption of the designated street front maps is clear. The ground
floor commercial requirements only apply within the designated street front. Outside of the
designated street, any permitted use may be allowed. And, prior to Ordinance 3955, multiple
dwelling units were unambiguously allowed in the BD2 zone.
Ordinance No. 3955 (2014)
The primary confusion on the residential -only interpretation results from the addition of this
phrase to the permitted use table in ECDC 16.43.020.A: "must be located on second floor or
behind first 45 feet from sidewalk or rights -of -way". That language was inserted with the
adoption of Ordinance No. 3955.
Discussions on the code revisions associated with Ord. 3955 were a continuation of the BD1
retail use discussions initiated in 2011, which resulted in Ord. 3865. The discussions around this
ordinance were solely related to clarifying the allowed retail uses in the BD1 zone which is
apparent from a reading of the title of Ord. No. 3955:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 16.43.020 RELATING TO LIMITING CERTAIN
OFFICE USES FROM LOCATING IN BUSINESS SPACES ALONG DESIGNATED GROUND FLOOR
STREET FRONTAGES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS 1 (BD1 — DOWNTOWN RETAIL
CORE) ZONE.
From review of the Planning Board minutes, it is apparent that the locational restrictions inserted
into Table 16.43-1 were intended to be added as a clarifying footnote.
Page 12 of 13
Packet Pg. 373
8.2.g
Board Member Lovell requested an explanation of how the proposal would impact a property
owner's ability to provide multi -family residential uses. Mr. Clifton answered that residential
uses would not be allowed within the areas designated as BD1 GFSF. However, residential
uses would be allowed behind the 45-foot street front spaces and in the upper floors. Mr.
Chave suggested that it might be helpful to add a reference in the footnote to the applicable
chapter in the code to provide more clarity. (09.11.2013 PB Minutes)
While this clarifying footnote ultimately proved to cause the confusion present today, it was
probably an indication of the caution with which the Planning Board was approaching this
proposed new allowance of residential in any portion of the BD1 ground floor. Keep in mind that
prior to Ordinance 3955, no residential would have been allowed on any portion of the BD1
ground floor. So, this was a significant change that would likely have caused some concern. But
in this effort to be extra cautious with BD1, the ambiguity that the "must be located" phrase
created for other zones was overlooked.
The fact that Ordinance 3955 was solely focused on BD1 is also underscored by other rows of the
permitted use table. On page 5 of Ordinance 3955, there are several rows added to the table to
describe the various types of office uses that are not allowed in the BD1 GFSF. But note that those
rows aren't even completed for the other BD zones. This corroborates the conclusion that
Ordinance 3955 was not intended to make any changes outside of the BD1 zone. Several of the
whereas clauses also mention only the BD1 zone as opposed to all of the BD zones.
When these code amendments were presented to the City Council (November 4, 2013 and
January 7, 2014) there was no discussion on limiting residential use in all BD zones. Rather, all
the discussion was focused on retail uses within the BD1 zone.
rnnrlucinn
Given the legislative history around designated street front, it is clear that the City Council was
aware that all permitted uses may be allowed outside the BD2 designated street front.
Furthermore, the insertion of locational restrictions for multifamily dwelling units into Table
16.43-1 was intended only to apply to the BD1 zone. Therefore the legislative history supports
the interpretation that a multifamily -only development may be located in the BD2 zone if the
property does not abut one of the mapped designated street fronts.
Page 13 of 13
0
CU
c
c
2
N
a)
0
E
c
Packet Pg. 374
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
ARPA Funding Status
Staff Lead: Shannon Burley
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Shannon Burley
Background/History
Section 4 of Ordinance No. 4229, passed by the City Council on July 20, 2021, set out the provisions for
utilizing the City's allocation of federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to mitigate the local
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These provisions divide the total funding of $11,893,099 into six
accounts, A through F, to concentrate the expenditure of funds into specific areas of interest.
City Council subsequently passed Ordinance. 4237, on November 1, 2021, to "clarifying the availability
of the grant funds and increasing the parameters of grant recipient eligibility".
During the latter part of 2021 and the first 2 months of 2022, programs within each Account designated
in Ordinance No. 4229 have progressed through startup phases with funding being committed and
expended per the terms of the ordinance.
Suggested wording edits and possible reallocations were discussed at the 4/12/2022 Finance Committee
Meeting.
Staff Recommendation
1) Discuss possible edits to Ordinance wording to eliminate unintended restrictions to disbursing
funds - see attached slides for detail.
2) Discuss possible reallocation of ARPA funds between categories -see attached slide for detail.
Please note that any suggested changes to the existing funding allocations will require the additional
amendments to the wording of the attached draft Ordinance.
Narrative
Attachments:
1) ARPA Funding Status Graphs
2) Suggest reallocation of funds
Attachments:
Ordinance 4237 - Amends Ordinance 4229 SB Comments
ARPA Discussion 4 19 22
Packet Pg. 375
8.3.a
ORDINANCE NO.4237
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 4229,
RELATED TO THE EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4229 on July 20, 2021, which set out
the provisions for utilizing Edmonds' allocation of federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
(ARPA) monies to mitigate the local impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and related social,
health and economic crises; and
WHEREAS, following adoption of Ordinance 4229, City staff determined that certain
revisions to the language of the Ordinance would benefit the public by clarifying the availability
of the grant funds and increasing the parameters for grant recipient eligibility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to incorporate the proposed revisions into the
provisions of Ordinance 4229 as set forth herein;
NOW THEREFORE;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection 4.B. of Ordinance 4229 is hereby amended as follows (deletions
are indicated by strike through: additions are indicated by underline):
B. Account "B" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Household Support" account
into which $4,150,000 from the ARPA funds shall be allocated to reimburse those City
expenditures incurred through administration of the following programs, in compliance
with the ARPA eligibility criteria:
1. Household Support. Up to $3,000,000 for Grants to households earning for housing
expenses, food, medical bills,childcare, internet access, and other household
expenses. Up-to-4004iHouseholds may receive grants of up to $2,500 in 2021 �no
2022. r"Households mayreceive grants of up to $2,500 in 2023 and
2024.
2. Utility Bill Support. Up to $150,000 for one-time grants to households in amounts
up to $1,000 €ef- } to
O�
N
N
d
t�
C
to
C
:a
L
O
to
C
N
E
a
ti
M
N
N
U
C
M
c
— '
Commented [MD7]: Would propose to eliminate
L. :r
of households limitation. Based on experience, mo:
O
households do not qualify for the maximum funding
.. nt.
Accordingly, we run out of number of household ca
+'
C
before we run out of money.
01
E
t
t)
r�
r�
Q
Packet Pg. 376
8.3.a
150 hattseholds ., help defray expenses derived from outstanding City of
Edmonds utilities bills.
3. Housing Repair. Up to $1,000,000 for one-time grants to households up to
$5,000 each earning nomore than 40% of Edmonds Median Income for
housing repair,) especially focused on energy -saving measures such as roof
repair, window replacement, HVAC repair/replacement, etc. Up to 200 grants
a4 up ,. $5,000 each
To be eligible for grants. households must meet one of the two following
parameters:
1) Eearn no more than 60% of EdmondsMedian Income. with priority given
2) Qualify for assistance under one of the listed programs on the U.S.
Department of the Treasury Final Rule for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery
Funds (SLFRF) program, as an impacted or disproportionately impacted
Section 2. Subsection 4.C.3 of Ordinance 4229 is hereby amended as follows (deletions
are indicated by strike through: additions are indicated by underline):
3. Small Business Support. Up to $625,000 for direct grants to small businesses
most affected by the COVID-19-related economic recession. Grants will take the
form of individual financial support grants (in the form of loans that are
forgivable after four months of performance), totaling up to 50 at up to $10,000
each in 2021, with up to 25 grants of up to $5,000 each available in 2022.
Eligibility criteria for these grants will include:
a. Small businesses in Edmonds with zero to 30 employees.
b. Businesses must demonstrate at least a 50% loss in revenue by the end of
2020 compared to the pre -pandemic 2019 revenues.
c. Businesses must not have received more than $10,000 in othergrants,
tax credits or other financial assistance.
2
N
M
r
CO
C
Commented [BS2]: I appears this is targeting tho
are disproportionately impacted as defined below (t]
e
extreme of the two measures, should update to refle
ILL
a
a
a
rn
C
E
Formatted: No underline, Underline color: Aut,
C
color: Auto, Character scale: 100%
C)
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.21", First line: 0"
m
O�
N
le
Commented [MD3]: Based on Final Rule, we we V
propose that a household qualifying under one of th,
categories would qualify for assistance for our grant M
C
L
O
rn
C
N
E
a
ti
M
N
N
v
C
tC
C
'a
L
O
r
C
d
E
t
v
M
a
Packet Pg. 377
8.3.a
d. Particular consideration will be given to businesses owned by people of
color, women, veterans, and other minorities.
Section 3. Section 5 of Ordinance 4229 is hereby amended as follows (additions are
indicated by underline):
3
R
a1
c
'a
C
3
LL
Q
IL
Q'
Q
N
r�
C
O
E
E
O
0
m
Cn
CD
I
N
N
d
t�
C
c0
C
L
O
a
ti
M
N
N
V
C
C
L
0
C
a)
E
L
:i
a
Packet Pg. 378
8.3.a
Section 5. For those accounts that specify the number of grants or the amount of grant
funds to be awarded in specific years. in the event that the number of grants or the
amount of grant funds awarded in a year will result in less than a full disbursement of
that year allocated funds, the Mayor or designee has the option to award additional
grants, to roll over remaining funds to the following year. or both. The City may only
use ARPA funds to cover costs incurred for one or more of the purposes allowed by
federal law and during the period beginning March 3, 2021, and ending December 31,
2024. A cost shall be considered to have been incurred for purposes of this Section if
the City has incurred an obligation with respect to such cost by December 31, 2024.
The City must return any funds not obligated by December 31, 2024, and any funds
not expended to cover such obligations by December 31, 2026.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 5. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance, being exempt under RCW 35A. 11.090(4),
as an ordinance appropriating money, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five
(5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
W
Q
Packet Pg. 379
8.3.a
Cu
a�
c
c
a_
Q
a
Q
w
c
a�
E
E
0
U
00
I
N
N
d
V
C
R
C
L
0
Ch
E
a
f+
a
Packet Pg. 380
112C. 10,9v
City of Edmonds City Council Meeting. April 19, 2022
Discussions for this agenda item:
1) Language edits to the City's Ordinance
to facilitate support p
2) Possible reallocation of ARPA funding categories.
Packet Pg. 381
Suggested Ordinance Changes: Ordinance No 4237
Based on actual experience, the language in the Ordinance setting both a "per
unit" dollar amount and a total number of "units" imposes an unforeseen limitation on
getting funding out to customers. For example with Household Support: 3
Ca
Current language - Household Support Example:
"Household support: Up to $3,000,000 for Grants to households earning for housing
expenses, food, medical bills, childcare, internet and other household expenses. Up to 40
households may receive grants up to $2,500 in 2021 and 2022. Up to 200 households may a
receive grants up to $2,500 in 2023 and 2024." N
NI
CD
I
Issue: Not all households have enough expenses to be eligible for the full $2,500. C
O
Accordingly, we hit the number of households limitation of 400 before we reach the fully 3
authorized annual funding limitation. y
0
a
IL
Possible new language: a
Household support: Up to $3,000,000 for Grants to households earning for housing
expenses, food, medical bills, childcare, internet and other household expenses. Up to 40
# _Households may receive grants up to $2,500 to a total Household Support expenditure of a
$1, 000, 000 in both 2021 and 2022. ► ►n to inn h Households may receive grants up to $2, 50
to a total expenditure of S500.000 in both 2023 and 2024. "
7, Packet Pg. 382
Suggested Ordinance Changes: Ordinance No 4237
Based on actual experience, it may be difficult for clients to provide adequate
documentation to show earnings in order to meet the 60% Edmonds Median Income
Limitation.
Current language: Household Support
"To be eligible for grants, households must earn no more than 60% of Edmonds Median
Income, with priority given to households earning at or below 40%."
Issue: It may be difficult for some households to provide documentation (W2, 1099, or
other verified means) to determine if they meet the 60% requirement.
Possible new language:
"To be eligible for grants, households must meet one of the two following parameters:
1) earn no more than 60% of Edmonds Median Income, with priority given to households
earning at or below 40%, or
2) qualify for assistance under one of the listed pro_qrams on the US Department of
Treasury Final Rule for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program, as ar
impacted or disproportionately impacted household or community/ "
a
ww�
Packet Pg. 383
Listed programs on the US Department of
Treasury Final Rule for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program:
In recognition of the difficulties cities were experiencing with qualifying clients to
Receive funding, Treasury's Final Rule established the following:
Impacted households. Treasury will recognize a household as impacted if it otherwise qualifies for
any of the following programs:
o Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
o Childcare Subsidies through the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Program
o Medicaid
o National Housing Trust Fund (HTF), for affordable housing programs only
o Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), for affordable housing programs only
Disproportionately impacted households. Treasury will recognize a household as disproportionately
impacted if it otherwise qualifies for any of the following programs:
o Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
o Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
o Free and Reduced -Price Lunch (NSLP) and/or School Breakfast (SBP) programs
o Medicare Part D Low-income Subsidies
o Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
o Head Start and/or Early Head Start
o Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
o Section 8 Vouchers
o Low -Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
o Pell Grants
o For services to address educational disparities, Treasury will recognize Title I eligible
schools36 as disproportionately impacted and responsive services that support the school
generally or support the whole school as eligible
Packet Pg. 384
Staff Recommended Changes to ARPA allocations:
• Combine $1,000,000 Housing Repair Program with
Household Support Grants and allow home repair as part of
Household Support Grant Program ($500,000 per year in
2023 & 2024 = $1M per year).
• Increase Non -Profit Support by $200,000
• Add $500,000 in Green Infrastructure to cover the Yost Park
Stormwater Mitigation (budgeted in REET, construction in
2022), this allows the funding to be available for future
projects.
• Reduce Green Streets by $400,000 ($600,000 remaining)
• Reduce Perrinville Creek by $300,000 ($3,200,000
remaining)
Packet Pg. 385
I 8.3.b I
Total ARPA Funds - $11,893,099
. $212,01
City Expenditures - 6.3% $488 84
- $ 50,000
Household Support - 34.9%
$1,050,0001
E $244,36
Business Support - 9.5% $56 007
$1,125,
= $420,E 00
Nonprofit Support - 4.2% $420,E 00
$500 000
. $199,999
Job Retraining - 5.0% $60 ,000
$60 ,000
$0
Green Infrastructure - 40.1% $0
$0
■ Spent by 4/12/2022
AL- in
$4,15
Edmonds Marsh: $750,000
Perrinville Creek: $3,500,000
Green Streets: $600, 000/ $400, 000*
$4,768,099
$1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000
Committments @ 4/12/2022 ■ Funds Allocated to Cate Pat
Packet Pg. 386
8.3.b
Household Support Subcategories - $4,1SO,000
Housing Repair Support - 24.0%
Utility Bill Support - 3.6%
Household General Support - 72.4%
1,000,000
1,000,000
$3,000,000
$0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,00(
■ Spent by 4/12/2022 Committments @ 4/12/2022 r' Funds Allocated to Category
Packet Pg. 387
8.3.b
Small Business Support - 55.6%
Tourism Support - 26.6%
General Business Support - 17.8%
Business Support Subcategories - $1,125,000
$0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000
$700,00(
■ Spent by 4/12/2022 Committments @ 4/12/2022 ■ Funds Allocated to Category I
Packet Pg. 388
Discussion
.* I
Packet Pg. 389
USE OF FUNDS
Recipients may use SLFRF funds to:
•Replace lost public sector revenue, using this funding to provide government
services up to the amount of revenue lost due to the pandemic.
*Respond to the far-reaching public health and negative economic impacts of the
pandemic, by supporting the health of communities, and helping households, small
businesses, impacted industries, nonprofits, and the public sector recover from
economic impacts.
*Provide premium pay for essential workers, offering additional support to those
who have and will bear the greatest health risks because of their service in critical
sectors.
Invest in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, making necessary
investments to improve access to clean drinking water, to support vital wastewater and
stormwater infrastructure, and to expand affordable access to broadband internet
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds I U.S. Department of the
Treasury
Packet Pg. 390
8.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses
Staff Lead: City Clerk
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
The City of Edmonds has administered a special event permit program for many years, although there is
no adopted city code outlining the process or criteria governing the issuance of special event permits.
This proposal was presented in the Public Safety, Personnel and Planning Committee on September 14,
2021. The Committee recommended that it be presented to the full council and a future meeting. This
item was subsequently introduced at the March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Consideration of an ordinance codifying the special event permit program in the Edmonds City Code
(ECC) and amending various code provisions in ECC Title 4 Licenses. Passage of a resolution adopting a
new City Fee Schedule to add fees relating to special event permits.
Narrative
It is the purpose of the City to establish a formal process for permitting special events that impact city
right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events
enhance the City of Edmonds community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of
venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental
services.
Staff is proposing a new chapter to Title 4 to be known as Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) to
provide a clear and efficient process for permitting special events within the City. This Chapter is
intended to supplement land use and street right-of-way regulations, to provide a coordinated process
for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special events, and to ensure
that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety or welfare. It is
further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent unplanned
disruption of public services, mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and to create a mechanism for cost
recovery without having an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the community.
In addition to adding a new Special Events section, some sections of Title 4 are proposed for repeal and
others have been refined to reflect that licenses are reviewed through the business license application
process. There are also changes to ECC 4.72 Business Licenses to reflect the city's partnership with the
State of Washington Department of Licensing. Finally, Chapter 4.98 Constitutionally Protected Events,
has been updated to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected
spontaneous demonstrations.
Packet Pg. 391
8.4
If the Council adopts the new special event permit code, staff recommends adoption of a resolution
adding permit fees to the City's Fee Schedule, consistent with the policy of recovering costs associated
with reviewing and issuing city permits.
Attachments:
Draft Special Events Permits Code
Draft Ordinance Amending Title 4 ECC Licenses
Resolution amending Fee Schedule related to Special Event Permits
PSPP091421
Packet Pg. 392
8.4.a
Special Events Permits Code
4.100.010 Purpose.
4.100.020 Definitions.
4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events.
4.100.040 Permit applications.
4.100.050 Indemnification.
4.100.060 Insurance.
4.100.070 Permit decision.
4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision.
4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events.
4.100.100 Cleanup deposit.
4.100.110 Suspension and revocation.
4.100.120 Exercise of police power.
4.100.130 Violation — Penalties.
4.100.010 Purpose.
It is the purpose of the City to establish a process for permitting special events that impact city right-of-
way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events enhance the
City of Edmonds community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of venues for
expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental services.
This Chapter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-way regulations, to provide a
coordinated process for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special
events, and to ensure that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety
or welfare. It is further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent
unplanned disruption of public services, mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and to create a mechanism
for cost recovery without having an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the community.
4.100.020 Definitions.
A. "City sponsored event" means a special event for which the city provides some level of sponsorship
and/or support to the primary event organizer/sponsor through the use of city funds, equipment, and/or
other city resources that is not a "city contracted event." City sponsored events may also be special events
that are organized and sponsored in full by the City of Edmonds. Reimbursement for city resources may be
required.
B. "City contracted event" means a special event that typically takes places on an ongoing annual basis
and for which the City and the event organizer/sponsor enter into an event contract to apportion
responsibility for the event, thereby eliminating the need for the event organizer/sponsor to obtain a special
event permit under this Chapter. Such events may be sponsored in part by the city. Examples of city
contracted events include the Garden Market/Summer Market, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July
celebration, Octoberfest, and Taste Edmonds.
C. "Commercial special event" means an activity or occurrence sponsored and operated by one or more
businesses that is conducted primarily for the exchange of goods or services for financial gain. Commercial
special events typically occur upon private property. Examples of commercial special events include
parking lot sales and tent sales, promotional events, and sidewalk sales.
Packet Pg. 393
8.4.a
D. "Emergency response plan" means a plan detailing the expected actions of event management and/or
public safety agencies in the event or threat of an emergency.
E. "Expressive event" or "Constitutionally protected event" means an activity or occurrence in which the
sole or principal purpose is the expression, dissemination, or communication of political or religious
opinion, views or ideas, and for which no fee or donation is charged or required as a condition of
participation or attendance. Examples of expressive special events include political rallies, marches, public
speeches, and political demonstrations. These events are regulated by Chapter 4.98.
F. "Fire marshal" means the city of Edmonds fire marshal or designee.
G. "Parade" means a type of special event involving an organized procession or march of more than 25
persons or 25 objects, or any combination thereof amounting to 25, that temporarily disrupts the general
public's normal use of public streets or sidewalks.
H. "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated association,
organization, or other entity or group of persons, however organized.
I. "Private" or "private event" means an event where persons are specifically and individually invited. It
does not include an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public.
J. "Public" or "public event" means a special event open to the public, and includes an event where tickets,
invitations, or announcements are available to the public.
K. "Public amusement" means circuses, carnivals, motion picture shows, exhibitions, concerts, side shows,
plays and other stage shows, amusement parks and any other form of diversion, pastime or recreation
conducted for and open to the public regardless of whether an admission fee or other charge is made for
attendance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the licensing and inspection of an activity
conducted under the auspices of a bona fide, accredited elementary school, middle school, high school or
college and conducted on the premises thereof in facilities previously inspected and approved for public
assembly.
L. "Right-of-way" means, within the City of Edmonds, all public right-of-way and property granted or
reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for street purposes, together with public property granted or
reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for walkways, paths, trails, sidewalks, and bikeways, whether
improved, unimproved, or unopened, including the air rights, sub -surface rights and easements related
thereto, and over which the City of Edmonds has authority and control.
M. "Run" or "race" means a type of special event involving any race, contest or event, whether of a
competitive or a noncompetitive nature, involving a procession of persons, whether afoot or upon any
vehicle or device propelled by the human body, including but not limited to marathons, fun runs,
walkathons, and bicycle races.
N. "Security" means employees, or other hired personnel, dedicated to maintaining order and ensuring
compliance with the laws of the state of Washington and ordinances of the city of Edmonds.
O. "Site" has the same meaning as set forth in ECDC 21.90.090, as now or hereafter amended, and in
addition in the case of undeveloped property, a land area under common ownership, whether the land area
is comprised of one lot, a combination of contiguous lots, or contiguous fractions of lots.
P. "Special events" include any event which is to be conducted on public property or in a public right-of-
way; and also, any event held on private property which would have a direct significant impact on: (a)
Packet Pg. 394
8.4.a
traffic circulation to and from the event over public streets or rights -of -way; (b) public streets or rights -of -
way near the event, or (c) the need for city -provided emergency services, such as police, fire or medical
aid, as determined by the city. It is presumed that any event on private property which involves: (i) an open
invitation to the public to attend; or (b) anticipated attendance by private invitation of 100 or more people
is an event that will have a direct significant impact on the public streets, rights -of -way or emergency
services. Special events may include, but are not limited to: fun runs and walks, auctions, parades, carnivals,
exhibitions, film/movie events, circuses, outdoor markets, and fairs.
Q. "Tent" means a temporary membrane structure or shelter, such as pop-up canopies, sails, and the like,
as defined in the current editions of the fire and building codes.
4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events.
A. Permit Required. Any person desiring to conduct or operate a special event within the City of Edmonds
shall first obtain a special event permit from the city, unless specifically exempt. It shall be unlawful for
any person to sponsor or conduct an event or activity requiring a special event permit without a valid special
event permit. Penalties for violation of the terms of this chapter shall be as specified by this chapter.
B. Consistency with Permit and Law. A special event shall be conducted as described by the special event
permit, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit and in accordance with applicable laws
and regulations.
C. Public and Personal Safety. The configuration and operation of special events shall conform to applicable
laws and regulations, including provisions relating to emergency ingress and egress, barrier -free facilities,
fire prevention, health and sanitation, and the operation of vehicles and equipment.
D. Business Licenses and Taxes. As required by applicable law, special event businesses/vendors shall have
City of Edmonds business licenses and shall record, report and remit taxes.
E. Exemptions. The following activities and occurrences shall comply with applicable laws and regulations,
but are exempt from the permit requirements of this chapter:
1. City contracted events.
2. Funerals and wedding processions.
3. Garage sales and rummage sales.
4. Neighborhood block parties.
5. Special event facilities. Events conducted at a facility designed for special event purposes or at
facilities where such events are normally held, such as churches, event centers, convention centers,
schools, athletic fields, auditoriums, stadiums, theaters, and the like.
6. Governmental activities. Activities conducted by a governmental agency acting within the scope
of its authority.
7. Regularly scheduled events utilizing park and recreation facilities, in accordance with the intended
use of the facility, and with park rules and policies.
Packet Pg. 395
8.4.a
8. A privately scheduled, non -reoccurring event upon private property in a residential zone with up
to 100 persons attending.
9. The temporary sale of seasonal goods when regulated by other statutes, such as Christmas tree
sales, and peddling of farm produce.
10. Expressive events (but see Chapter 4.98 for regulations pertaining to expressive events).
F. Signs.
1. With a special event permit application, applicants may request, and the appropriate director or
designee that would otherwise authorize such signage may authorize, the use of temporary on -site
(on -premises) and off -site (off -premises) signs.
2. Special event signs shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity of the sign. Signs shall not obstruct visibility for motorists
and pedestrians, nor impede access to buildings or property. The installation of signs upon public
property shall be subject to inspection by the building official and/or city engineer.
3. The applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance, and removal of all signs.
4.100.040 Permit applications.
A. The administrative services director or designee is authorized to prepare and maintain necessary
application forms and may issue written administrative policies and procedures as needed for the
implementation of this chapter.
B. Applications for special event permits shall be submitted to the administrative services director or
designee, a minimum of 60 days prior to a small event (less than 100 people) and a minimum of 90 days
prior to a major event (more than 100 people). If an event organizer fails to meet these timelines, the
application may still be processed if all affected departments agree to process the application within the
shortened timeframe. Factors in determining whether to allow for processing a late application will include
the impact on city resources and rights -of -way, and conflicts with other already scheduled events.
C. Applications for special event permits shall include written authorization of the property owner. For
special events proposed upon city -owned property, the approval of a special event permit application shall
constitute city authorization to conduct the event upon the property described in the permit application.
D. Applications for special event permits shall be on forms prepared by the administrative services director
or designee and shall include information that any city department processing the application deems
necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to enable it to review the application. The
information requested shall enable the city to assess the scope of the event so as to evaluate the impact of
the event on city resources and the community.
E. Application fee(s) for special event permits are set forth in the City's adopted fee schedule.
4.100.050 Indemnification.
Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant and authorized officer of the
sponsoring organization must agree to reimburse the city for any costs incurred by it in repairing damage
to city property and indemnify and defend the city, its officers, employees, and agents from all causes of
Packet Pg. 396
8.4.a
action, claims or liabilities occurring in connection with the permitted event, except those which occur due
to the city's sole negligence.
4.100.060 Insurance.
Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant shall comply with the following
insurance requirements:
(1) The permit applicant shall obtain commercial general liability insurance in amounts acceptable to
the city attorney's office.
(2) Written proof of such insurance is required prior to permit issuance. The insurance policy shall be
written on an occurrence basis, shall name the city as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 26,
or coverage at least as broad, and shall be written for a period that includes the timeframe for both the
set-up before and the clean-up following the completion of the event. The applicant shall provide the
city and all additional insureds for this event with written notice of any policy cancellation within two
(2) business days of their receipt of such notice.
(3) Liquor Liability Coverage. Liquor liability coverage must be obtained when liquor is served as a
part of a special event permitted under this chapter.
(a) A vendor hired by the special event permittee to serve liquor must provide evidence of liquor
liability coverage in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office, naming the city as additional
insured. This insurance coverage is in addition to the special event permittee's overall general liability
requirement.
(b) A special event permittee serving liquor directly shall obtain host liquor coverage as a part of
providing commercial general liability insurance per subsection (1) of this section.
4.100.070 Permit decision.
A. After receiving a completed application in conformance with this chapter, along with the non-refundable
permit application fee, the administrative services director or designee shall consult with all affected
divisions or departments, such as Building, Planning, Engineering, Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and
Recreation, Finance, and Risk Management. Following consultation with all affected departments and
divisions, the administrative services director or designee may approve, conditionally approve, or deny an
application for a special event permit based upon the provisions of this chapter. When an application is
conditionally approved or denied, the administrative services director or designee shall provide written
explanation of the grounds for the conditions of approval or denial, and the applicant's right of appeal
pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
B. Decision criteria. A permit may be issued to an applicant only if all the following criteria and conditions
for issuance are met:
1. The special event will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare;
2. The special event will not be injurious to property or improvements in the immediate vicinity of
the special event;
3. The special event will not endanger participants, spectators, or the public;
Packet Pg. 397
8.4.a
4. The special event has a traffic management plan or other adequate and appropriate measures in
place to mitigate any traffic safety and mobility issues, including for both vehicles and pedestrians;
5. Adequate and appropriate sanitation and refuse facilities are planned;
6. The special event has adequate and appropriate measures in place to ensure the safe movement,
assemblage and dispersion of people attending the event. Such measures may include the use of
safety guardrails, fences, ropes, barricades, and the like;
7. The special event will not cause excessive or harmful fumes, odor, smoke, noise or light and must
be consistent with Chapter 5.30 entitled "Noise Abatement and Control";
8. The special event will provide for the appropriate collection and disposal of waste, recycling, and
compostables;
9. Adequate plans exist to return the area or routes impacted by the special event to the same
condition or cleanliness as existed prior to the event;
10. Applicant has agreed to the indemnity and hold harmless provisions in the application;
11. Applicant has provided proof of the requisite insurance provisions in the application;
12. For city sponsored events, applicant has agreed to reimburse the city for the provision of
additional city services, including but not limited to the employment of police officers to direct or
block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or the provisions of standby aid car or fire protection services,
as required.
4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision.
Decisions of the administrative services director or designee are appealable. An appeal of the
administrative services director or designee's decision related to application of this chapter may be filed
with the administrative services director or designee within 10 business days of notification of the decision.
Such appeal shall be filed and processed in accordance with the appeal provisions for business licenses as
provided by Chapter 4.72. The appeal filing fee shall be as specified by the fee schedule.
4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events.
A. Upon approval of a special event permit application for a city sponsored event, the administrative
services director or designee shall provide the applicant with a statement of the estimated cost of providing
city resources, such as personnel and equipment, for the special event, if applicable. The applicant/sponsor
of the event may be required to prepay these estimated costs ten (10) days prior to the special event. The
special event application fee per the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city council is a separate
processing fee and is not applicable to the city services fees. City resources may include the use of police
officers and public employees for traffic and crowd control; pickup and delivery of traffic control devices,
picnic tables, and the like; extraordinary street sweeping; and any other needed, requested or required city
service, along with the cost of operating any equipment needed to provide such services.
B. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the date(s) of the city sponsored event is less than the
estimated cost, the applicant/sponsor will be refunded the difference by the city in a timely manner. If the
actual cost for the use of city resources on the date(s) of the city sponsored event is greater than the estimated
Packet Pg. 398
8.4.a
cost, the city will invoice the applicant/sponsor for the difference, and the invoice shall be paid in a timely
manner.
C. Permit fees and fees for the use of city resources may be waived in part or in full by the city if, in review
of the application, it is found that the city sponsored event is of sufficient public benefit to warrant the
expenditure of city funds without reimbursement by the applicant/sponsor and would not result in the
private financial gain of any individual or "for -profit" entity.
4.100.100 Cleanup deposit.
A. The applicant/sponsor of a special event likely to create a substantial need for cleanup may be required
to provide a cleanup deposit prior to the issuance of a special event permit.
B. The cleanup deposit may be returned after the event if the area used for the permitted event has been
cleaned and restored to the same condition as existed prior to the event within twenty-four (24) hours after
the conclusion of the event.
C. If the property used for the event has not been properly cleaned or restored within twenty-four (24) hours
after the conclusion of the event, the applicant/sponsor shall be invoiced for the actual cost to the city for
cleanup and restoration, which invoice shall be paid in a timely manner. The cleanup deposit shall be
applied toward the payment of the invoice.
4.100.110. Suspension and revocation.
A. In instances in which the special event does not comply with the provisions of this chapter, the terms
and conditions of the approved permit, or other applicable law, the administrative services director or
designee may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit with the issuance of written findings.
B. When necessary to prevent serious injury to persons, property or the public peace, health, safety or
welfare, the administrative services director or designee, fire marshal, building official, development
services director or chief of police, or the designee of each, may suspend or revoke an approved special
event permit effective immediately. The city official or designee shall deliver written notice of suspension
or revocation to the permit applicant/event sponsor or manager.
4.100.120 Exercise of police power.
This chapter is enacted as an exercise of the city's police powers and shall not be construed to impose any
duty owed by the city to any permittee under this chapter or to any member of the public, nor shall any
permit be construed as waiver of any violation of the laws of the city.
4.100.130 Violation — Penalties.
A. It shall be a misdemeanor for any person to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or the conditions
imposed upon any permit issued hereunder, which shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand
dollars ($1,000) or imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) days. Each day, or part thereof, during which
any such violations occur or are continued, shall constitute a separate offense.
B. In addition, permits issued hereunder shall be subject to suspension or revocation as provided herein,
and civil abatement proceedings as set forth in Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
Packet Pg. 399
8.4.a
C. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of this chapter or the conditions of any
permit issued hereunder shall also subject the permittee to a daily civil penalty in the amount specified by
Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
D. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of the chapter or the conditions of any
permit issued hereunder may forfeit their right to hold a special event in the city.
Packet Pg. 400
8.4.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF OR AMENDMENT TO
CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF TITLE 4 ECC (LICENSES) AND FOR
THE ADOPTION OF A NEW CHAPTER TO TITLE 4 ECC
RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has determined that certain
Chapters of Title 4 ECC (Licenses) are obsolete and are no longer required to be maintained in the
code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain revisions to Chapters 4.12
(Peddlers, Solicitors and Street Vendors), 4.52 (Regulations for Adult Entertainment Facilities), 4.68
(Community Antenna Televisions Systems), 4.72 (Business License), 4.90 (Public Markets), and 4.98
(Constitutionally Protected Events) are needed to clarify City requirements, to reflect the repeal of
other sections of Title 4, and to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally
protected spontaneous demonstrations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a new chapter to Title 4 to be known
as Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) is needed to provide a clear and efficient process for
permitting special events within the City for the benefit of its citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following Chapters of Title 4 ECC (Licenses) are hereby repealed
in their entirety: 4.11 (Motor Vehicle Wreckers); 4.22 (Malt Liquor by the Keg); 4.24 (Game
Licenses); 4.32 (Public Amusements); 4.40 (Public Dances); 4.44 (Teen Dance Halls); 4.48 (Cabaret
Dances); 4.50 (Licensing of Public Massage Parlors and Public Bathhouses); 4.56 (Sound Trucks);
4.60 (Taxicabs); 4.75 (Pawnbrokers); 4.80 (Aircraft Landing Permits); and 4.85 (Horse Taxis).
Packet Pg. 401
8.4.b
Section 2. Chapter 4.12 ECC (Peddlers, Solicitors and Street Vendors) is hereby
amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfike thfough):
4.12.010 Definitions.
A. "Solicitor" or "peddler" means any person who shall sell, offer for or expose for sale, or who shall
trade, deal or traffic in any goods or services in the city by going from house to house or from place to
place or by indiscriminately approaching individuals.
1. Sales by sample or for future delivery, and executory contracts of sale by solicitors or
peddlers are included; provided, however, that this section shall not be deemed applicable to any
salesman or canvasser who solicits trade from wholesale or retail dealers in the city.
2. Any person who, while selling or offering for sale any goods, services or anything of value,
stands in a doorway, any unenclosed vacant lot, parcel of land, or in any other place not used by
such person as a permanent place of business shall be deemed a solicitor or peddler within the
meaning of this chapter, except as noted in subsection (B) of this section.
B. "Street vendor" means any person who shall sell food, flowers, nonalcoholic beverages only, and/or
other goods or services from either a motorized or nonmotorized mobile vending unit.
C. "Motorized mobile vending unit" means a truck, van or other motorized vehicle that incorporates a
kitchen or other food preparation area from which prepared or prepackaged food may be sold.
D. "Nonmotorized mobile vending unit" means a cart, kiosk or other device capable of being pushed
by one person, with at least two functional wheels and positive wheel -locking devices.
4.12.020 License required.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to act as solicitor, peddler or street vendor within the meaning
and application of this chapter unless that person or his/her employer shall have first secured a Ci1y of
Edmonds business license in manner- pr-evided in this ehapte�—The license required byas required under Chapter 4.72 ECC.
1. Any person who shall sell, deliver or peddle any dairy product, meat, poultry, eel, fish,
mollusk, or shellfish must first obtain a license pursuant to this chapter.
2. No licenses shall be issued or maintained for the sale of poultry or poultry products or meat or
meat products which are adulterated or distributed under unsanitary conditions.
3. No licenses shall be issued for the sale of shellfish unless the vendor can produce a certificate
of compliance as required by RCW 69.30.020.
B. All persons acting as a solicitor, peddler or street vendor shall comply with all laws, ordinances and
regulations, including all Snohomish County health department requirements.
Packet Pg. 402
8.4.b
C. All solicitors, peddlers or street vendors must report any sales made within the city of Edmonds to
the Department of Revenue as sales that have occurred within the city.
The lieense fees for- selieiter-s, peddlers or- street Neader-s shall be as �911ews:
I'
.111r
"
11
• ��
All No AWN.
!El�iLf!fs !!�!1fl4!•
ems=
w
am
N
C
d
t�
J
N
r+
F-
LU
O
N
r
C
1v
E
C
d
E
a
to
E
L
a)
a
c
m
w
m
a
CO
m
to
C
d
C�
J
<.i
U
W
d
r�
H
r�
Q
Packet Pg. 403
8.4.b
be�ween the
Edmonds
the Por-t
Edmonds
the
eity
of
or-
of
and another-
entiVy,
sUeh as
aAs
,
FE)tn4h
July
fir-ewor-ks,
Taste
Edmonds,
stimmer- maf4Eet,
of par-ade
and
of
a -ad elassie
ear- show.
C
J
N
their-
identifleation
by
r+
exempt
stattis
along
with photo
upon request
a pr-OspeetiVe e:UstE)Mef
H
law enforcement
officer;
U
W
O
N
r
health ,list.-i,.t
0 0
0 �.ts
Gl
C
d
4.12.040 License
applieation
information
required-.
E
a
A. Any firm
desiring
to
)
per -son,
or other
organization
seeure
a solicitor's,
peddler's
of
, and
stieh
follows:1.
c
m
The name,
addfess
and telephone
number-
of the
pr-ineipal applieant,
firm or- other-
>
organization;
in the
the
the
has
the last two
m
a
event
'applieant
name
or address
of
ehanged
within
yeafs,Coname
..
and
address
ever-
the last two
year- period
pr-eeeding
the most
r-eeefit;
m
N
3. The
the
to be
by
C
natufe
or- ehafaetef
of
goods, war
-es, mefehandise
of
sefvi.ees
offered
eaeh-
ipal
C�
'
J
<.i
4. A list
th
U
ef
—inally
eentempla4ing
solieita4ion,
peddling
of street vending
within-
Wthe
Edmonds,
the information
in
this
to
eity of
and
r-eqttir-ed
subseetion
(B)
of seetieft as
eaeh,
r�
H5.
The
telephone
home)
the individual
name,
address
and
atimber-
(btisiness
and
of
aefing
as
For-
1e
the
Edmonds to
eaeh pefson solieiting,
peddling E)r- street vending wit -kin
e4y of ptir-stia-at a
L
independent
employee,B.
++
by the ..its, shall
sot forth t -son the
following: 0c1
provided and
as each such per
G
t
l�ev n o
��v�n }p�1 y
ddress�eCV1
a
Packet Pg. 404
8.4.b
2.
The
telephone
the
fifm
holding
name,
address
and
number-
o�
per -son,
or-
other- or-ganiza4ion
ipal
0
0.
m
the
t.,.
Vl
3
His or- her-
age
and
gefiefal
pe „1 ,lo.,,.Fiptioo
o
.-oa by
e ,
C
d
t�
J
the
e ty i
the .
f ,- an
N
plie.,tio
;
H
G
U
Sueh other-
ifi
f,,-.-.-.a4ion
as
r-easonably
required
by ,.;tom.
,. ffieials
W
O
N
baek-gr-otifid
im,esfig4ion
the
Upon
C
of
"
'
Gl
results of
the investigation
t the
a ty elo -L.
E
C
d
D. if,
the
iwvestigation,
the
is
found
to have
the
E
as a
result
of
applieant
not
eommitted
any
of aets
denial
listed
below,
the
the
isso
a
requififig
as
eity elefk
shall, ttpon
payment
of
prescribed
N
Committed
fraud
•
any act
eonsisting
of
or misrepresentation;
L
w
IL
c
o
t
f
r e
e;
>W
o
been
felony
difeedy
to-
years,
eonvieted
of
a misdemeanor-
of
felating
e.
,
CO
but
not limited
to, those
misdefneafiefs
and felonies
iffi,olving
moral
,
m
C
d
C�
4.
Been
felony
the type
defined
in
t
J
ehafged
with
a misdemeanor-
or-
ef
subseetien
(D)(3) of
tha4 is
<.i
seefien
and
'pending;osition
of
e
still
U
W
5.
Been
lieense
the
this
that
refused
a
under-
previsions
of
ehapter-;
pr-evided,
, any
denied
license
the
this
if
the
r�
applicant
a
under provisions
of
chapter
may
reapply
and
when
H
reasons
fer-
denial
no
longer-
; an
r
E. Evefy peddler- shall be feqttir-ed to eaffy the peddler's lieense and display it along with ph
F. The is to the
O
eity elerk authorized pr-emulga4e niles r-egafdifig manner and
method of payment,
ineltiding a prohibition or- r-egttl4ion of payment by and the fefm of the
applieation.
L
'
• .050 •
�c
G
t
(i
yr
a
Packet Pg. 405
8.4.b
or stfeet 0 pr-eor-0 0s.
4.12.055 Street vendor requirements.
Any person seeking a pem+k City of Edmonds business license for a street vendor license under the
definition of this chapter shall comply with the following requirements:
A. Mobile vending units may be allowed to operate within the following commercially zoned areas
including unzoned property or right-of-way adjacent to or abutting commercially zoned areas:
1. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units: neighborhood business (BN), community
business (BC), planned business (BP), downtown business zones (BD I, BD2, BD3, BD4 and
BD5), commercial waterfront (CW), general commercial (CG, CG2), Firdale Village mixed -use
(FVMU), medical use (MU) and public use (P).
B. In addition to the licensing requirements of this chapter, any street vendor shall be required to
obtain a street use permit. Application fees for street use permits are those established by the city
council by resolution in its sole legislative discretion. Application fees shall be paid to the city prior to
issuance of any permit.
C. All advertising shall be placed on the nonmotorized mobile vending unit and will not be allowed on
the street or sidewalk. Maximum sign area allowed shall be 10 square feet.
D. The vending site shall be kept clean and orderly at all times, and the vendor must provide a refuse
container and is encouraged to provide containers for recycling. No portion of a vendor's inventory,
sales equipment, or any other structure or equipment used in the sales or solicitation process shall be
left overnight upon any unenclosed portion of any lot or site within the city, nor upon any public street
or right-of-way.
E. The city reserves the right to limit the number of vending permit sites in any given area of the city.
When the number of permitted mobile vendors reaches 15, a review before the city council is triggered
to determine if the number of mobile vendors should be limited. The city council review may consider
the needs of the public, diversity of products offered for sale, the smooth flow of pedestrian and
vehicular traffic, number of complaints, and locations where the vending units are located.
F. If located on a sidewalk, a minimum clearance of five feet shall be maintained by any street vendor
Packet Pg. 406
8.4.b
G. Street vendors shall not locate within that portion of improved street right-of-way designed for
vehicular traffic or parking. Street vendors seeking to locate in improved street rights -of -way or on
sidewalks shall be oriented toward pedestrian traffic movement or safety. Any application to locate a
street vendor in the street right-of-way shall require approval by the city traffic engineer and shall not
interfere in any way with vehicular or pedestrian traffic or safety.
H. No mechanical audio or noise making devices and no hawking is allowed. Hawking is the loud,
repeated oral solicitation of business by the vendor or an assistant.
I. Street vendors may operate in parks if they have a concession agreement with the city of Edmonds to
operate on a specific park property.
J. Street vendors are prohibited in residentially zoned areas, and unzoned property or right-of-way
adjacent to or abutting the residentially zoned areas.
K. All street vendors shall comply with all applicable Snohomish County health district requirements.
L. The applicant shall submit with his application a copy of the written approval for the vending site
from the property owner when locating on private property. When locating on a sidewalk within the
right-of-way, the applicant shall have written approval for the vending site from the abutting property
owner and/or tenant. In the event that the property owner or tenant shall disagree, the property owner's
decision shall be final.
1. In the event that the proposed site is on or abuts property owned by the city of Edmonds, the
applicant shall be required to obtain the city's approval. Approvals relating to park property
shall be handled as a request to let a concession under the terms of this chapter. Request for sites
abutting all other public land owned by the city shall be forwarded to the city council for their
review and approval.
2. In the event that the proposed site is on or abuts publicly owned property not owned by the
city of Edmonds, the applicant shall be required to obtain approval from the public entity that
owns the property.
3. In the event that the site for which approval is sought abuts vacant land, the applicant shall
make reasonable written attempts to secure the approval of the property owner. If the applicant
is unable to do so, the city may accept written proof of such attempts and issue a conditional
permit. If a complaint is later received from the owner of the land, the license shall be revoked.
The granting of such a conditional license shall vest no right in the applicant.
M. When locating within a parking lot of a private location, the applicant shall:
1. Identify the location the mobile vending unit will be located and provide a circulation plan.
The location and circulation plan shall require approval by the city traffic engineer to ensure the
vending unit will not interfere in any way with vehicular or pedestrian traffic or safety.
2. Demonstrate that the site will meet the parking requirements of Chapter 17.50 ECDC
excluding the parking space(s) occupied by the mobile vending unit.
Packet Pg. 407
8.4.b
N. The maximum permissible size for any nonmotorized mobile vending unit shall be:
1. Thirty square feet for sidewalk locations; and
2. Fifty square feet for locations within the street or other public right-of-way or when located
on private property.
3. In no event shall any nonmotorized mobile vending unit exceed 10 feet in length.
O. During special events held within the city where food providers are required to pay a fee to
participate (such as the Edmonds Art Festival and Taste of Edmonds), no mobile vending units may be
allowed to operate within one -quarter mile of the special event.
lop
4.12.065 Soliciting and peddling restrictions.
All licenses issued pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to the following time and location
restrictions:
A. Fourth of July Fireworks Display. For the purpose of crowd and traffic control on the Fourth of
July, all soliciting after 6:00 p.m. within one mile of the official fireworks display shall take place only
within the confines of the fireworks viewing area as designated by the chief of police on the Civic
Center playfield.
B. No peddler or solicitor shall engage or attempt to engage in the business of peddling at any home,
residence, apartment complex or business that prominently displays a "No Peddlers" or "No
Solicitors" sign or any other similar sign that communicates the occupants' desire to not be contacted
by peddlers.
C. No peddler or solicitor shall engage in the business of peddling between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
9:00 a.m.
D. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units which are located directly adjacent to
residentially zoned property may not operate between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Motorized
and nonmotorized mobile vending units not located directly adjacent to residentially zoned property
may not operate between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Packet Pg. 408
8.4.b
4.12.070 Carrying of license required.
Stieh heense A City of Edmonds business license shall be carried at all times by each solicitor, peddler
or street vendor for whom issued, when soliciting, canvassing or street vending in the city of Edmonds,
and shall be exhibited by any such solicitor, peddler or street vendor whenever and wherever he or she
shall be requested to do so by any police officer or any person solicited.
soheitor, peddlef or- stfeet vendor- of any of the or-dinanees of the eity of Edmonds. The eity of -
Edmonds may also r-&veke a heense fet: a st-Feet veader- under- the following eenditions:
A. Failufe to eemply with the tefms of this ehaptef;
A. Aqienever- the detefmines that thefe is for- denying
heense
city eler-k eadse
any appheation
keense using a4 least ene of the following fnetheds: (1) fegister-ed of
the heensee. Netiee to the
(2) eet4ified mail, r-etufa feeeipt
the lieense be
requested of (3) personal sef-,4ee on mailed
deemed three days The the
address on shall
for- the deni
r-eeeived after- mailing. notiee shall speeif�
r-eveea4ien of ., 1:
gr-otmds
6isi:if� - ••y:.
D. The hearing shall be de neve. The eity eetineil may ,
e d
cscisivrr.
appropriate aefien in Snohomish Getnity s"er-ier- eetift within 14 days of the eity eetineil's deeision.
Q
Packet Pg. 409
8.4.b
4.12.090 Purchase orders — Form and content.
All orders taken by licensed solicitors; or peddlers ^r street vend shall be in writing, in duplicate,
stating the name as it appears on the license, the address of both the solicitor, peddler or street vendor
and his or her employer, the terms thereof, and the amount paid in advance, and one copy shall be
given to the purchaser.
4.12.100 Pe-nalties.Penalty for violation.
Any per -son or- per -sons who violate or- fail to eemply with any of the pfevisions of this ehapter- shall
npo�sen otioN of said violation be punished as providedinECC5.59 020. AU person, as defined
herein, and the officers, directors, managing agents, or partners of anorporation, firm, partnership or
other organization or business violating or failing to comply with any provisions of this chapter shall
be . uilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding
$250.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding nine months, or both, and each day of violation
shall constitute a separate offense.
4.12.110 Severability.
Should any section, clause or provision of this chapter be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same
shall not affect the validity of the chapter as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to
be invalid.
Section 3. Chapter 4.52 ECC (Regulations for Adult Entertainment Facilities),
subsections .030, .060, .070, .080, .100, .110, .250 and .260, are hereby amended to read as follows
(new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike through):
4.52.030 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, certain terms and words are defined as follows:
A. "Adult entertainment" shall mean:
1. Any exhibition, performance or dance of any type conducted in an adult entertainment facility
where such exhibition, performance or dance involves a person who is unclothed or in such
costume, attire or clothing as to expose any portion of the female breast below the top of the
areola or any portion of the pubic region, anus, buttocks, vulva or genitals, or human male
genitals in a discernibly turgid state, or wearing any device or covering exposed to view which
simulates the appearance of any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola or any
portion of the pubic region, anus, buttocks, vulva or genitals, or human male genitals in a
discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered; or
2. Any exhibition, performance or dance of any type conducted in an adult entertainment facility
where such exhibition, performance or dance is distinguished or characterized by a predominant
emphasis on the depiction, description, simulation or relation to the following specified sexual
activities:
Packet Pg. 410
8.4.b
a. Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal; or
b. Acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse or sodomy; or
c. Fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, anus, buttocks or
female breast; or
3. Any exhibition, performance or dance intended to sexually stimulate any patron and
conducted in an adult entertainment facility where such exhibition, performance or dance is
performed for, arranged with or engaged in with fewer than all patrons in the adult entertainment
facility at that time, with separate consideration paid, either directly or indirectly, for such
performance, exhibition or dance. For purposes of example and not limitation, such exhibitions,
performances or dances are commonly referred to as table dancing, couch dancing, taxi dancing,
lap dancing, private dancing or straddle dancing.
B. "Adult entertainment facilities" shall mean those businesses defined as follows:
1. "Adult arcade": a commercial establishment containing individual viewing areas or booths,
where, for any form of consideration, including a membership fee, one or more still or motion
picture projectors, slide projectors, or other similar image producing machines are used to show
films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides, or other photographic reproduction of specified
sexual activities or specified anatomical areas.
2. "Adult cabaret": a nightclub, bar, restaurant, theater or auditorium, or similar commercial
establishment, whether or not alcoholic beverages are served, which features adult
entertainment.
3. "Adult motel": a hotel, motel, or similar commercial establishment which:
a. Offers sleeping accommodations to the public for any form of consideration and
provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures, video
cassettes, slides, or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by the
depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas and are
not rated G, PG, PG-13, NC-13, NC-17 or R by the Motion Picture Association of
America; or the establishment has a sign visible from the public right-of-way which
advertises the availability of this adult type of photographic reproductions; or
b. Offers a sleeping room for rent for a rental fee period of time that is less than 10 hours;
or
c. Allows a tenant or occupant of a sleeping room to subrent the room for a period of time
that is less than 10 hours.
4. "Adult motion picture theater": a commercial establishment or drive-in theater where films,
motion pictures, video cassettes, slides, or similar photographic reproductions characterized by
the depiction or description of specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities and are
not rated G, PG, PG-13, NC-13, NC-17 or R by the Motion Picture Association of America and
are shown for any form of consideration.
Packet Pg. 411
8.4.b
5. "Other adult entertainment facility": any commercial establishment to which any patron is
invited or admitted and where adult entertainment is provided on a regular basis and as a
substantial part of the activities of the establishment.
C. "Barker" shall mean any person who is located at the entrance of or outside of an adult
entertainment facility, and attempts to solicit business for the same by using voice or gestures.
D. "City" shall mean the city of Edmonds, Washington.
E. "Director" shall mean the administrative services director e or his/her designee.
F. "Employee" shall mean any and all persons, including managers, entertainers, independent
contractors, renters, lessees, or sublessees, who work in or at or render any services directly related to
the operation of any adult entertainment facility whether or not such person is paid compensation by
the operator of said business.
G. "Entertainer" shall mean any person who provides live adult entertainment in an adult
entertainment facility, whether or not that person is an employee of the business and whether or not a
fee is charged or accepted for such entertainment, and whether or not that person is nude, semi-nude or
clothed.
H. "Establishment" shall mean any of the following:
1. The opening or commencement of an adult entertainment facility as a new business; or
2. The conversion of an existing business, whether or not an adult entertainment facility, to an
adult entertainment facility; or
3. The addition of an adult entertainment facility to any other existing adult entertainment
facility; or
4. The relocation of any adult entertainment facility; or
5. An existing adult entertainment facility.
I. "Expressive dance" shall mean any dance which, when considered in the context of the entire
performance, constitutes an expression of art, theme, story or ideas, but excluding any dance such as,
but not limited to, common barroom -type topless dancing which, when considered in the context of the
entire performance, is presented primarily as a means of displaying nudity as a sales device or for
other commercial exploitation without substantial expression of theme, story or ideas, and the conduct
appeals to the prurient interest, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and lacks serious
literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
J. "Manager" shall mean any person who manages, directs, administers, or is in charge of, the affairs
and/or the conduct of an adult entertainment facility.
K. "Nude" or "state of nudity" shall mean the appearance or less than complete and opaque covering
of the human anus, male genitals, female genitals, or the areola or nipple of the female breast. The
Packet Pg. 412
8.4.b
opaque covering shall be made of material or fabric, but shall not include any liquid substance,
including mud, water, lotion, whipping cream, or other such substances that are easily broken down or
removed and do not offer the covering intended for an "opaque covering."
L. "Operator" shall mean the owner, significant stockholder or significant owner of interest, custodian,
licensee, manager, or person in charge of any licensed adult entertainment facility.
M. "Licensed establishment" shall mean any establishment that requires a license and that is classified
as an adult entertainment facility.
N. "Licensee" shall mean a person in whose name a license to operate an adult entertainment facility
has been issued, as well as the individual listed as an applicant on the application for a license.
O. "Person" shall mean and include any individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, association, social
club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver or any other group or
combination acting as a unit.
P. "Semi-nude" shall mean a state of undress in which clothing completely and opaquely covers only
the genitals, pubic region, and areola and nipple of the female breast, as well as portions of the body
covered by supporting straps or devices.
Q. "Specified anatomical areas" shall mean and include any of the following:
1. Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, anus, or areola of
the female breasts or any artificial depiction of the same; or
2. Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered.
R. "Specified criminal activities" shall mean and include any conviction for acts which constitute
sexual crimes against children, sexual abuse, rape, distribution of obscenity or erotic material to
minors, prostitution, pandering, or racketeering.
S. "Specified sexual activity" shall mean and include any of the following:
1. The fondling or other intentional touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, anus, or
female breasts; or
2. Sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including intercourse, oral copulation, or
sodomy; or
3. Masturbation, actual or simulated; or
4. Human genitals or artificial depictions of the same in a state of sexual stimulation, arousal or
tumescence; or
5. Excretory functions as part of or in connection with any of the activities set forth in
subdivisions 1 through 4 of this subsection.
Packet Pg. 413
8.4.b
T. "Transfer of ownership or control" shall mean and include any of the following:
1. The sale, lease, or sublease of an adult entertainment facility, or substantially all of the assets
of an adult entertainment facility; or
2. The transfer of securities which constitute a controlling interest in the adult entertainment
facility, whether by sale, exchange, or similar means; or
3. The establishment of a trust, gift, or other similar legal device which transfers the ownership
or control of the adult entertainment facility, except for transfer by bequest or other operation of
law upon the death of a person possessing the ownership or control.
4.52.060 License required.
A. It shall be unlawful to operate an adult entertainment facility without a valid adult entertainment
facility license, issued by the city for the particular type of adult entertainment to be conducted. The
license or licenses required under this chapter are in addition to a business license that may be required
under Chapter 4.72 ECC.
B. The administrative services director sty elerlf, or hiss designee, is responsible for granting,
denying, revoking, renewing, suspending, and canceling adult entertainment facility licenses. The
director of the department of planning or his/her designee is responsible for ascertaining whether a
license application for a proposed adult entertainment facility complies with all requirements
enumerated herein and all other applicable zoning laws and/or regulations.
C. An application for an adult entertainment facility license shall be made on a form provided by the
city.
D. The completed application shall contain the following information and shall be accompanied by the
following documents:
1. If the applicant is an individual/sole proprietor, then the individual/owner shall state his/her
legal name and any aliases, stage names, or previous names, date of birth, Social Security
number and submit satisfactory proof that he/she is 18 years of age or older.
2. If the applicant is a partnership, then the partnership shall state its complete name, and the
legal names of all partners, including their dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and whether
the partnership is general or limited, and a copy of the partnership agreement, if any.
3. If the applicant is a corporation, including a limited liability organization, then the corporation
shall state its complete name, the date of its incorporation, evidence that the corporation is in
good standing under the laws of the state of Washington, the legal names, dates of birth, Social
Security numbers of all directors, or principal stockholders, and the capacity of all officers,
directors and principal stockholders; the name of the registered corporate agent, and the address
of the registered office for service of process.
Packet Pg. 414
8.4.b
4. Each officer, director, or principal stockholder shall provide the administrative services
director, or designee, eity e1ef 4 -easufeF with an affidavit attesting to his/her identity and
relationship to the corporation. A principal stockholder shall mean those persons who own 10
percent or greater interest in the adult entertainment facility.
5. If the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to subsection (D)(1), (2) or (3) has been
convicted of a crime within a four-year period immediately preceding the date of the application,
then the applicant must state the specific criminal act involved, the date of conviction and the
place of conviction.
6. If the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to this section has, within the last four
years, had a previous permit or license under this chapter or other similar ordinances from
another city or county denied, suspended, or revoked, then the applicant must state the name and
location of the adult entertainment facility for which the permit or license was denied,
suspended, or revoked, the entity denying the same, as well as the date of the denial, suspension,
or revocation.
7. If the applicant or any other entity listed pursuant to this section holds any other licenses
under this chapter or any other permits or licenses from other jurisdictions, including a sexually
oriented business license from another city or county, then the applicant must state the names
and locations of such other permitted or licensed businesses.
8. The single classification of license for which the applicant is filing.
9. The location of the proposed adult entertainment facility, including a legal description of the
property, street address, and telephone number(s), if any.
10. The applicant's mailing address and residential address.
11. Two two-inch by two-inch color photographs of the applicant, including any corporate
applicants, taken within six months of the date of the application, showing only the full face of
the same. The photographs shall be provided at the applicant's expense. The license, when
issued, shall have affixed to it one such photograph of the applicant.
12. The applicant and/or each corporate applicant's driver's license number, Social Security
number, and his/her state or federally issued tax identification number, if any.
13. Each application shall be accompanied by a complete set of fingerprints of each person
required to be a party to the application, including all corporate applicants as defined above,
utilizing fingerprint forms as prescribed by the chief of police or homer designee.
14. A sketch or diagram showing the configuration of the adult entertainment facility, including
a statement of total floor space occupied by the establishment. The sketch or diagram must be
professionally prepared and accepted by the city, and it must be drawn to a designated scale or
drawn with marked dimensions of the interior of the adult entertainment facility to an accuracy
of plus or minus six inches.
E. Applicants for a license under this chapter shall have a continuing duty to promptly supplement
application information required in the event that said information changes in any way from what is
Packet Pg. 415
8.4.b
stated on the application. The failure to comply with said continuing duty within 30 days from the date
of such change by supplementing the application on file with the administrative services director eil�-
e er-k or homer designee shall be grounds for suspension of a license.
F. In the event the administrative services director eity eleor her designee determines or learns at
any time that the applicant has improperly completed the application for a proposed adult
entertainment facility license, he/she shall promptly notify the applicant of such fact and allow the
applicant 10 days to properly complete the application. (The time period for granting or denying a
license shall be stayed during the period in which the applicant is allowed an opportunity to properly
complete the application).
G. The applicant must be qualified according to the provisions of this section, and the adult
entertainment facility must be inspected and found to be in compliance with health, fire, and building
codes of the city.
H. The applicant shall pay a preliminary nonrefundable processing fee established by resolution at the
time of filing an application under this section. Note: This is a processing fee. License fees shall also
be required in the event the application is approved.
I. The fact that a person possesses other types of state or city permits and/or licenses does not exempt
him/her from the requirement of obtaining an adult entertainment facility license.
J. The application form for licenses issued under this chapter shall contain a provision providing that
under penalty of perjury the applicant verifies that the information contained therein is true to the best
of his/her knowledge.
4.52.070 Investigation and application.
A. Upon receipt of an application properly filed with the administrative services director e ,
and upon payment of the nonrefundable processing fee, the administrative services director e
or his4ie designee shall immediately stamp the application as received and shall immediately
thereafter send photocopies of the application to other city departments or other agencies responsible
for enforcement of health, fire, criminal and building codes and laws. Each department or agency shall
promptly conduct an investigation of the application and the proposed adult entertainment facility.
Said investigation shall be completed within 20 days of receipt of the application by the administrative
services director eity ele or maker designee, unless circumstances support extending the
investigation. If the investigation is extended, the city shall inform the applicant of the extension and
the reason. The extension shall be for no longer than 10 additional days from the original expiration of
the 20-day time period stated above. At the conclusion of its investigation, each department or agency
shall indicate on the photocopy of the application its recommendation as to approval or disapproval of
the application, date it, sign it, and in the event it recommends disapproval, state the specific reasons
therefor, citing applicable laws or regulations.
B. A department or agency shall recommend disapproval of an application if it finds that the proposed
adult entertainment facility will be in violation of any provision of any statute, code, ordinance,
regulation, or other law in effect in the city, or if the applicant does not meet the conditions as
specified in this chapter. After its indication of approval or disapproval, each department or agency
shall immediately return the photocopy of the application to the administrative services director eit)-
eler-k or his�her designee.
Packet Pg. 416
8.4.b
C. In addition to the license fees set forth in this chapter, an applicant shall pay a charge equal to the
actual cost of fire inspection in accordance with the provisions of ECDC 19.25.025.
4.52.080 Issuance of license.
A. The administrative services director eity ele or hs/her designee shall grant or deny an application
for a license within 60 days from the date of its proper filing unless the city or applicant establishes a
good reason for up to a 10-day extension as provided above.
B. Grant of Application for License.
1. The administrative services director eity ele or his/he designee shall grant the application
unless one or more of the criteria set forth in subsection C of this section (Denial of Application
for License) is present.
2. The license, if granted, shall state on its face the name of the person or persons to whom it is
granted, the expiration date, and the address of the adult entertainment facility. The license shall
be posted in a conspicuous place, at or near the entrance to the adult entertainment facility so
that it can be easily read at any time. The license shall be valid until the end of the year.
C. Denial of Application for License. The administrative services director eity ele or his/her
designee shall deny the application for any of the following reasons:
1. An applicant is under 18 years of age or will be employing a person under 18 years of age.
2. An applicant is overdue on his/her payment to the city of taxes, fees, fines, assessments, or
penalties assessed or imposed against him/her in relation to an adult entertainment facility.
3. An applicant has failed to provide information required by this section or the application for
the issuance of the license, or has falsely answered a question or request for information on the
application form.
4. The applicant has failed to comply with any provision or requirement of this chapter.
5. The applicant has failed to comply with any city codes or zoning regulations, or other state or
federal regulations or court order applicable to an adult entertainment facility.
6. The applicant has been convicted of a felony within the last 10 years involving an adult
entertainment facility including, but not limited to, prostitution, promoting prostitution, and/or
possession of controlled substances as that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW.
4.52.100 Licenses for managers and entertainers.
A. No person shall work as a manager or entertainer at any adult entertainment facility without having
first obtained the appropriate entertainer's or manager's license from the administrative services
director ei yLele. Each such applicant shall not be required to obtain an adult entertainment facility
Packet Pg. 417
8.4.b
license, but shall complete an application containing the information identified in ECC 4.52.060 (D)
and comply with the same requirements and procedures as set forth in ECC 4.52.060 through 4.52.080.
A nonrefundable processing fee established by resolution shall accompany the application.
B. It is unlawful for any entertainer, employee or operator to knowingly work in or about or knowingly
perform any service directly related to the operation of an unlicensed adult entertainment facility.
C. The annual fee for such a license shall be established by resolution. The amount shall be used for
the cost of administration and enforcement of this chapter.
D. This license expires annually on December 31 st of each year and must be renewed by January 1 st
of each year. This license shall not be prorated.
E. The applicant must be 18 years of age or older.
4.52.110 Due date for license fees.
All licenses required by this chapter must be issued and the applicable fees paid to the administrative
services director eit-y eleat least 14 calendar days before commencing work at an adult entertainment
facility, and on an annual basis as described above.
4.52.250 Record keeping requirements.
A. Within 30 days following each calendar quarter, each adult entertainment facility licensee shall file
with the administrative services director eity elerk a verified report showing the licensee's gross
receipts and amounts paid to entertainers, models, or escorts, if applicable, for the preceding calendar
year.
B. Each adult entertainment facility licensee shall maintain and retain for a period of two years from
the date of termination of employment, the names, addresses, Social Security numbers and ages of all
persons employed or otherwise retained as entertainers, models, and escorts by the licensee.
4.52.260 Denial, suspension or revocation of license, and appeal procedures.
A. When the administrative services director perk refuses to grant a license, or revokes the same,
he/she shall notify the applicant in writing of the same, describing the reasons therefor, and shall
inform the applicant of his right to appeal to the city council within 10 days of the date of the written
notice by filing a written notice of appeal with the administrative services director eity elek containing
a statement of the specific reasons for the appeal and a statement of the relief requested.
B. Whenever the administrative services director eity elek has found or determined that any violation
of this chapter has occurred, he/she shall issue a notice of violation and suspension or revocation
("notice") to the licensee. In addition, the administrative services director eity elerlf shall issue a notice
of suspension or revocation to the licensee under the following circumstances:
1. Where such license was obtained by fraud or false representation of fact;
Packet Pg. 418
8.4.b
2. For the violation of, or failure to comply with, the provisions of this chapter or any other
similar local or state law by the licensee or by any of its agents, employees or representatives,
when the licensee knew or should have known of the violations committed by its agents,
employees or representatives;
3. For the conviction of the licensee of any crime or offense committed at the adult
entertainment facility involving prostitution, promoting prostitution or transactions involving
controlled substances (as that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW), or the conviction of the
licensee's employees, agents or representatives of any crime or offense committed at the adult
entertainment facility involving prostitution, or transactions involving controlled substances (as
that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW).
C. The notice shall include the following:
1. Name(s) of person(s) involved.
2. Description of the violation(s), including date and section of this chapter violated.
3. Description of the administrative action taken.
4. Rights of appeal as set forth above.
D. The notice shall be served either personally or by mailing a copy of the notice by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the licensee at his or her last known address. Proof of
service shall be made at the time of service by a written declaration under penalty of perjury, executed
by the person effecting the service, declaring the time, date, and the manner by which service was
made. The decision may be appealed to the city council if request for appeal is properly filed with the
administrative services director ewewithin 10 calendar days of receipt of the notice. Said request
shall be in writing, state specific reasons for the appeal, and the relief requested.
E. The suspension or revocation of a license shall be effective at the end of the expiration of any
appeal period, unless there is a written request for an appeal properly filed by the licensee. If there is
an appeal so requested, then the revocation or suspension shall be stayed pending the outcome of the
appeal. This effective date of suspension shall not apply to any fire code violation or building code
violation deemed by the appropriate officials to be a serious risk to health and welfare.
F. Within 10 working days of receiving a timely appeal, the administrative services director eity eler
shall forward the administrative record of the licensing decision to the city council.
G. When an applicant has appealed the administrative services director e decision according to
the stipulations herein, the city council shall review the administrative record as soon as possible, but
no later than 30 working days after the city receives the appeal. Written notice of the date, time, and
place of the scheduled meeting will be given to the applicant by the administrative services director
eity ele by mailing the same, postage prepaid, to the applicant at the address shown on the license
application, at least five days prior to the meeting.
H. If the licensee appeals the notice to the city council, the licensee shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity to be heard as to the violation and action taken. The licensee and administrative services
director eity elerlf or designee his e„resenta* shall be given an opportunity to argue the merits of
Packet Pg. 419
8.4.b
the appeal before the city council. Oral argument by each party shall not exceed 10 minutes and shall
be limited to the administrative record before the council.
I. The city council shall uphold the administrative services director's e s decision unless it
finds the decision is not supported by evidence in the administrative record.
J. The city council shall issue a written decision within 10 working days of hearing the appeal. The
council may uphold the administrative services director's e4 elerk's decision and deny the license,
overrule the administrative services director's "c's decision and issue the license, or remand the
matter to the administrative services director eivy ele for further review and action. The
administrative services director city cle shall complete further action or review within 30 working
days of receiving any remand.
K. A decision by the city council shall constitute final administrative review. The applicant or licensee
shall be responsible for the cost of any preparation of the record for appeal.
L. Either party may seek judicial review of a final decision of the city council as provided by law.
Section 4. Chapter 4.68 (Community Antenna Television Systems), subsections .050,
.290, .390, and .400, are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted
text is shown in strike through):
4.68.050 Acceptance.
No franchise granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall become effective unless and until
the ordinance granting same has become effective.
Within 30 days after the effective date of the ordinance awarding a franchise, or within such extended
period of time as the council in its discretion may authorize, a franchisee shall file with the
administrative services director eity elerl£ its written acceptance of the franchise, in a form satisfactory
to the city attorney, together with the bond and insurance policies required by ECC 4.68.330,
Insurance, and 4.68.340, Performance bond.
4.68.290 Removal and abandonment of property of franchisee.
The city may direct a franchisee to temporarily disconnect or bypass any equipment of a franchisee in
order to complete street construction or modification, install and remove underground utilities, or for
other reasons of public safety and efficient operation of the city. Such removal, relocation or other
requirement shall be at the sole expense of a franchisee.
In the event that the use of any part of the cable system is discontinued for any reason for a continuous
period of 12 months, or in the event such system or property has been installed in any street or public
place without complying with the requirements of the franchise or other city ordinances or the
franchise has been terminated, cancelled or has expired, a franchisee shall promptly, upon being given
10 days' notice, remove within 90 days from the streets or public places all such property and poles of
Packet Pg. 420
8.4.b
such system other than any which the city may permit to be abandoned in place which permission shall
not be unreasonably withheld. In the event of such removal, a franchisee shall promptly restore the
street or other areas from which such property has been removed to a condition reasonably satisfactory
to the city.
Any property of a franchisee remaining in place 90 days after the termination or expiration of the
franchise shall be considered permanently abandoned unless the franchisee has commenced removal
within a reasonable time.
Any property of a franchisee to be abandoned in place shall be abandoned in such manner as the city
shall prescribe. Upon permanent abandonment of the property of a franchisee in place, the property
shall become that of the city, and a franchisee shall submit to the administrative services director eity-
e4erk an instrument in writing, to be approved by the city attorney, transferring to the city the
ownership of such property. None of the foregoing affects or limits franchisee's rights to compensation
for an involuntary abandonment of its property under state or federal law.
4.68.390 Expedited review process — Competitive franchises.
In accordance with the competitive franchise rule adopted pursuant to Part 76 of Title 47 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 76.41, a process for expedited review of franchise applications for
a competitive franchise is hereby established.
A. Application of Rule. Any application for a cable franchise agreement submitted pursuant to 47 CFR
Section 76.41 to the city shall contain the requisite information set forth herein. The mayor and staff
shall evaluate the application and make recommendations to the Edmonds city council based on the
criteria set forth herein.
B. Definitions. As used in this local rule, definitions shall be as follows:
1. "Affiliated entity" or "affiliate" means any entity having ownership or control in common
with the grantee, in whole or in part, including, without limitation, grantee's parent corporations
and any subsidiaries or affiliates of such parent corporations.
2. "CFAR franchise applicant" or "applicant" means an applicant for a cable franchise pursuant
to the provisions of the competitive franchise application rule (CFAR) set forth in Part 76 of
47 CFR Section 76.41, and includes the parent corporation, its subsidiaries and principals.
3. "City" means the city of Edmonds.
4. "Control" is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in
whatever manner exercised.
5. "Interest" includes officers, directors and shareholders owning five percent or more of the
CFAR franchise applicant's outstanding stock or any equivalent voting interest of a partnership
or joint venture.
Packet Pg. 421
8.4.b
6. "Model cable franchise template" means this chapter, containing standard franchise terms and
conditions for cable franchises granted in the city, as the same exists or is hereafter amended
through a process that wi44 commenced in 2008. Franchises granted under the then -existing
Chapter 4.68 shall expired on April 26, 2011, unless an earlier date is was established in the
review process.
7. "Staff' means the persons or positions designated by the mayor for review. The term shall
include any consultant hired by the city to assist in its review.
8. "Parent corporation" includes any entity with ownership or control of the CFAR franchise
applicant.
9. "Principal" includes any person, firm, corporation, partnership, joint venture, affiliates, or
other entity, who or which has control of or interest in a CFAR franchise applicant.
10. "Regulatory authority" includes any governmental or quasi -governmental organization or
entity with jurisdiction over all or any portion of the CFAR franchise applicant or its operations
C. Competitive Franchise Application Submission. A CFAR franchise applicant shall include in its
application detailed written responses to the requisite information set forth in ECC 4.68.400, in
addition to any information required by 47 CFR Section 76.41 (hereinafter collectively the
"application"). A CFAR franchise applicant shall submit an application fee required under ECC
4.68.410 as part of its application to the city. A CFAR franchise applicant shall also provide any
additional information requested by the staff that is relevant to the evaluation of the application under
the criteria adopted herein and applicable law. Completed application and the application fee shall be
filed with the administrative services director eit-y eleat the following address:
Administrative Services Director City Cie
City of Edmonds
121 — 5th Ave. North
Edmonds, WA 98020
The staff shall accept and review only those applications that include complete responses to every
element of the information required herein. Submission of an application that does not include the
requisite information set forth in ECC 4.68.400 and the application fee shall not commence the time
period set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 for granting or denying an application. If the staff requests
any additional information from the CFAR franchise applicant, the time period set forth in 47 CFR
Section 76.41 shall be tolled from the date the information is requested until the date such information
is received by the staff.
The CFAR franchise applicant shall immediately submit additional or updated information as
necessary to ensure the requisite information provided is complete and accurate throughout the staff
review of the application.
Packet Pg. 422
8.4.b
Upon request, the staff will promptly provide access to documents or information in its possession or
control that are necessary for the completion of an application; provided, that the CFAR franchise
applicant does not otherwise have access to such documents or information and that such documents or
information are subject to disclosure under Washington public records laws.
4.68.400 CFAR application requisites.
A. Identification and Ownership Information.
1. Identification of Applicant and Proposed Franchisee.
a. State the name, address, telephone number and web site (if applicable) of the applicant
and the proposed franchisee (if different from applicant).
b. State the name, address, primary telephone number and primary e-mail address of all
individual(s) authorized to represent the applicant before the staff during their
consideration of the franchise(s) requested, including the applicant's primary contact and
any additional authorized contacts.
2. Business Structure.
a. Corporation.
i. If applicant is a corporation, please list all officers and members of the board of
directors, their principal affiliations and their addresses;
ii. Attach a certified copy of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the
corporation as well as certificates of good standing from the Secretary of State of the
state of incorporation as well as the state of Washington; and
iii. State whether the applicant is directly or indirectly controlled by another
corporation or legal entity. If so, attach an explanatory statement and response to
subsections (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section concerning the controlling corporation.
b. Partnership.
i. If applicant is a partnership, please describe the structure of the partnership and the
interests of general and limited partners.
ii. State whether the applicant is controlled directly or indirectly by any corporation
or other legal entity. If so, respond to subsections (2)(a)(i) and (ii) or (2)(b)(i) of this
section, as applicable, concerning the controlling entity.
3. Experience.
a. Current Franchises. Please list all cable systems operated by the applicant in the last five
years. For each system, include name of system, address, communities served, number of
subscribers, number of homes passed, date of system award, duration (start and end date)
Packet Pg. 423
8.4.b
of franchise, status of construction, and percent of penetration of homes passed as of most
recently available date (include date). Also include name, title, and telephone number of
the system manager and authorized representative of the franchising authority.
b. Pending Franchises. List communities where the applicant or any affiliate currently has
a formal or informal request pending for an initial franchise, the renewal of a franchise, or
the approval of a transfer of ownership. Include names of communities, date of application,
date of expected action, and estimated number of homes. Also include complete contact
information of an authorized representative of the franchise authority.
4. Management Structure. Attach a management/organizational chart showing the management
structure of the applicant. Also, provide a similar chart showing the relationship of the applicant
to all general partners, parent corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates and all other subsidiaries of
parent corporation, including a brief description of each entity's relationship to the applicant.
5. Management Agreement. State whether there are any management agreements existing or
proposed between the applicant and any parent corporation or affiliate related to construction
and operation of the applicant's planned system in Edmonds. If yes, attach a copy of any such
agreement.
B. Legal Qualifications.
1. Media Cross -Ownership. Section 613 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984,
47 USC Section 533 (a), and applicable FCC rules prohibit certain forms of media cross -
ownership. Please state whether the applicant or an affiliate directly or indirectly owns, operates,
controls or has an interest in any of the following, or whether the applicant holds or operates any
company or business operating jointly with any of the following:
a. A national broadcast television network (such as ABC, CBS or NBC, etc.).
b. A television broadcast station whose predicted Grade B contour, computed in
accordance with Section 73.684 of the FCC's rules, overlaps in whole or in part in the city,
or an application for license to operate such a station.
c. A telecommunications or telephone company whose service area includes any portion of
the city.
If the response to any of the above is affirmative, state the name of the applicant or affiliate, the
nature and percentage of ownership or interest and the company that is owned or in which the
interest is held.
2. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Federal law requires cable system
operators to be certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as being in
compliance with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Section 634(e) of the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 USC Section 554(e). The applicant shall attach any
current FCC certification(s) for its existing cable system holdings, if any, or indicate its intention
to apply for and abide by same.
Packet Pg. 424
8.4.b
3. Franchise Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation
by a regulatory authority or franchising authority of any franchise ordinance or agreement,
contract or regulation governing a cable system. If so, identify the judicial or administrative
proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal and result or disposition of that proceeding.
4. Other Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation of
any franchise, ordinance, agreement, permit, contract or regulation by a regulatory authority of
any other type (e.g., public utility commission). If so, identify the judicial or administrative
proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal and result or disposition of that proceeding.
C. Financial Qualifications.
1. For applicants with existing operations: provide audited financial statements, including
statements of income, balance sheets and cash flow statements, together with any notes
necessary to the understanding of the financial statements for the last three fiscal years for the
applicant and any parent corporation. Please provide associated operating statistics including
distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable service subscribers, and number of
subscribers to other tiers or services, including digital services, Internet access services,
telephone services and number of premium units, for the operations corresponding to the
financial statements.
2. For all applicants: provide detailed pro forma projections for both applicant's operations in
the city and any regional or national planned operations of which the city is a part for the next
five fiscal years from the date of the application, including balance sheets, income statements,
and statements of cash flows, or, alternatively, at a minimum, detailed projected income and
cash flow statements. Please include associated operating statistic assumptions for these
projections including distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable service
subscribers, number of subscribers to other tiers or services (e.g., digital service, high-speed
Internet access service, telephone service, etc.), and number of premium units. Also, describe
any other assumptions reflected in the projections, including (a) revenue assumptions, such as
service rates, (b) expense assumptions, such as direct costs of service, staffing levels, or
anticipated cost inflation, (c) capital expenditure assumptions, such as miles of plant to be built
and costs per mile of construction or per subscriber, and (d) financing assumptions, such as
funds to be borrowed and from whom, interest rates, and timing of repayment, or equity
infusions and distributions. Please provide these projections in electronic (Excel spreadsheet)
form as well as in printed form.
D. Technical Qualifications, Planned Services and Operations.
1. Describe the applicant's planned initial and proposed geographic cable service area, including
a map and proposed dates for offering service to each area;
2. If the applicant has or asserts existing authority to access the public right-of-way in any of the
initial or proposed service areas listed in subsection (D)(1) of this section, state the basis for
such authority or asserted authority and attach the relevant agreements or other documentation
of such authority;
Packet Pg. 425
8.4.b
3. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned residential cable services, including basic
cable services, cable programming service tiers, and any additional pay -per -view, on -demand or
digital services; and the projected rates for each category or tier or service;
4. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned system technical design, upstream and
downstream capacity and speed, provision for analog or digital services or packages, distribution
of fiber, and planned count of households per residential node;
5. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned nonresidential cable services;
6. Describe the applicant's planned construction and extension or phase schedule, as applicable,
including system extension plans or policy; describe current status of the applicant's existing or
proposed arrangements with area utilities, including pole attachments, vault, or conduit sharing
agreements as applicable;
7. Describe the applicant's plan to ensure that the safety, functioning and appearance of property
and convenience and safety of other persons not be adversely affected by installation or
construction of the applicant's facilities, and that property owners are justly compensated for
any damages caused by the installation, construction, operation or removal of the facilities; also
state the proposed allocation of costs of installation, construction, operation or removal of
facilities between the applicant and the subscriber;
8. Describe the availability and cost of a device to enable a subscriber to block obscene or
indecent programming; and
9. Describe the applicant's plan to comply with the subscriber privacy protections set forth in
47 USC Section 551.
E. Minimum Franchise Obligations. Please state the applicant's intention to meet each of the following
minimum cable franchise standards:
1. Model Franchises. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of this chapter.
2. Right -of -Way ("ROW") Regulations. The applicant shall stipulate in writing that it will at all
times comply with all applicable and lawful city laws and regulations related to use of the public
ROW within the boundaries of the city.
3. Nondiscrimination. The applicant shall stipulate that it shall not deny cable service to any
group of potential residential cable subscribers in the cable service area proposed by applicant
based on their income.
4. Franchise Fees. The applicant shall pay franchise fees on a monthly basis, unless otherwise
agreed to by the city, at the franchise fee rate established by ordinance for all cable service
providers in Edmonds.
F. City Expectations. The applicant will provide a detailed proposal as part of its application regarding
each of the below provisions to enable the city to determine whether the application meets the cable -
related needs and interests of the city.
Packet Pg. 426
8.4.b
1. Build -Out. The city expects that all residents within a specified cable service area will have
access to applicant's cable services consistent with all applicable local, state and federal laws
and regulations. The applicant shall provide a proposal to provide access to cable services to all
residents in applicant's proposed cable service area within a reasonable time period. Maps of
existing franchise districts are on file with the staff s office or available by contacting the city at
425-775-2525. The staff may reconsider cable service areas proposed by applicant that overlap
the geographic boundaries of existing Edmonds cable franchise districts. Applicant shall clearly
specify all build -out criteria and exceptions.
2. PEG Channel Capacity. The applicant shall provide the same channel capacity as available
under existing incumbent city cable franchise agreements. Channel capacity is not limited to
channels currently in use but shall include all available channels under existing franchise
agreements.
G. Proposed Franchise Terms. The city's model cable franchise template, Attachment A to this rule,
reflects terms and conditions required of other cable operations in Edmonds as of the effective date of
the CFAR. The applicant shall list any proposed amendments to the model cable franchise template
and an explanation as to why the amendment should be considered by the city. These proposed
amendments may either be included in this section of applicant's CFAR franchise application or
shown directly on the model cable franchise template. An electronic copy of the model cable franchise
template may be obtained by calling staff at 425-775-2525 or on the city's web site:
www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
H. Miscellaneous Provisions. State whether the applicant contemplates the provision of any cable
services on its system under an open video systems ("OVS") regulatory regime, within the meaning of
Section 653 of the 1934 Communications Act (47 USC Section 573).
I. Affidavit of Applicant. Each application shall be accompanied by an affidavit substantially in the
form set forth below:
This application of the Applicant is submitted by the undersigned who has been duly
authorized to make the representations within on behalf of the Applicant and certifies the
representations are true and correct.
The Applicant recognizes that all representations are binding on it and that material
misrepresentations or omissions, or failure to adhere to any such representation may result
in a negative staff recommendation to the Edmonds City Council, or denial of a CFAR
Franchise Application by the Edmonds City Council.
Consent is hereby given to the staff and their representatives or agents to make inquiry
into the legal character, technical, financial and other qualifications of the Applicant by
contacting any persons or organizations named herein as references, or by any other
appropriate means.
The Applicant recognizes that information submitted is open to public inspection and
subject to the Washington Public Records Law. We advise the Applicant to be familiar
with the Washington Public Records Act at Chapter 42.56 RCW. The Applicant should
specifically identify any information which the Applicant has deemed proprietary, the
Staff, as appropriate, will tender to the Applicant the defense of any request to compel
disclosure. By submitting information which the Applicant deems proprietary or otherwise
Packet Pg. 427
8.4.b
exempt from disclosure, the Applicant agrees to defend and hold harmless the City of
Edmonds and the staff from any claim for disclosure including but not limited to expenses
including out-of-pocket costs and attorneys' fees, as well as any judgment entered against
the City of Edmonds or the staff for the attorney fees of the party requesting disclosure.
Name of Applicant's Authorized Representative:
Affiant's Signature:
Official Position:
Date:
NOTARIZATION
Subscribed and sworn before me this of , 20
Notary Public for Washington:
My Commission expires:
J. Application Fee. The application fee to cover the reasonable cost of processing application is set
forth in ECC 4.68.410. The fee shall be equal to the actual, reasonable costs of review, and the
application fee shall be considered a deposit against payment or reimbursement of the city's costs.
K. Review Process.
1. Acceptance of Application. Within 10 business days of receipt of an application, staff shall
review the application to ensure all requisite information is included in the application.
a. If the application is not complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within 10
business days, listing the requisite information that is required to complete the application
and notifying the applicant that the time period for granting or denying the application set
forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 will not begin to run until such information is received.
b. If the application is complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within five
business days by certified mail that all requisite information has been received.
2. Staff Review. Staff shall review all completed applications based on the review criteria set
forth herein. If, during the review of an application, staff requires additional information from
the applicant, staff will promptly request the information from the applicant, in writing, along
with a notification that the time period for granting or denying the application set forth in
47 CFR Section 76.41 will be tolled until such information is received by the staff. After
completing the review, staff shall provide an analysis of the application and recommendations to
the Edmonds city council.
3. Public Notification and Opportunity to Comment. The Edmonds city council may hold a
public hearing to provide the applicant and residents in the proposed cable service area prompt
notice and an opportunity to comment on any CFAR franchise application. Notice requirements
for public hearings shall be provided 10 business days in advance; provided, however, that the
Packet Pg. 428
8.4.b
administrative services director " may shorten or alter these requirements as needed to
meet the deadline for a council decision set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41, unless the applicant
and the staff agree to extend the deadline.
4. Review Criteria. The staff may recommend to the city council denial of an application of any
of the following exists:
a. The applicant does not have the financial, technical, or legal qualifications to provide
cable service; or
b. The applicant will not provide adequate public, educational, and governmental access
channel capacity, facilities, or financial support, as evidenced by the most recent needs
ascertainment conducted by or on behalf of the staff or other relevant study of community
needs; or
c. The applicant will not meet the city's minimum reasonable build -out requirements; or
d. The applicant's proposed terms do not comply with applicable federal, state and local
laws and regulations including, but not limited to, local customer service standards or
relevant existing city contractual obligations; or
e. Applicant has made material misrepresentations or omissions, or has failed to adhere to
any such representations.
5. Length of Franchise. A franchise granted under these provisions shall expire on the date
established in the review process, in no event later than April 26, 2011, the same date as any
underlying, nonexclusive cable franchise previously granted by the city. This franchise length
has been established in order to permit full assessment of the needs of the city and its citizens as
permitted by 47 USC Section 521, et seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder as this
chapter is revised.
Section 5. Chapter 4.72 ECC (Business License) is hereby amended to read as follows
(new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strip):
4.72.010 Definitions.
In construing the provisions of this chapter, save when otherwise declared or clearly apparent from the
context, the following definitions shall be applied:
A. Person. The term "person" shall include one or more persons of either- s&and gender, corporations,
partnerships, associations, or other entity capable of having an action at law brought against such
entity, but shall not include employees of of persons licensed pursuant to this chapter.
B. Business. The term "business" includes all services and activities engaged in with the object of
pecuniary gain, benefit or advantage to the person, or to any other person or class, directly or
indirectly, whether part-time or full-time.
Packet Pg. 429
8.4.b
C. Engaging in Business. The term "engaging in business" means commencing, conducting, or
continuing in business, and also the exercise of corporate or franchise powers, as well as liquidating a
business when the liquidators thereof hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business.
1. This section sets forth examples of activities that constitute engaging in business in the city,
and establishes safe harbors for certain of those activities so that a person who meets the criteria
may engage in de minimis business activities in the city without having to pay a business license
fee. The activities listed in this section are illustrative only and are not intended to narrow the
definition of "engaging in business" in subsection (C) of this section. If an activity is not listed,
whether it constitutes engaging in business in the city shall be determined by considering all the
facts and circumstances and applicable law.
2. Without being all-inclusive, any one of the following activities conducted within the city by a
person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting
on its behalf, constitutes engaging in business and requires a person to register and obtain a
business license:
a. Owning, renting, leasing, maintaining, or having the right to use, or using, tangible
personal property, intangible personal property, or real property permanently or
temporarily located in the city.
b. Owning, renting, leasing, using, or maintaining an office, place of business, or other
establishment in the city.
c. Soliciting sales.
d. Making repairs or providing maintenance or service to real or tangible personal property,
including warranty work and property maintenance.
e. Providing technical assistance or service, including quality control, product inspections,
warranty work, or similar services on or in connection with tangible personal property sold
by the person or on its behalf.
f. Installing, constructing, or supervising installation or construction of real or tangible
personal property.
g. Soliciting, negotiating, or approving franchise, license, or other similar agreements.
h. Collecting current or delinquent accounts.
i. Picking up and transporting tangible personal property, solid waste, construction debris,
or excavated materials.
j. Providing disinfecting and pest control services, employment and labor pool services,
home nursing care, janitorial services, appraising, landscape architectural services, security
system services, surveying, and real estate services including the listing of homes and
managing real property.
Packet Pg. 430
8.4.b
k. Rendering professional services such as those provided by accountants, architects,
attorneys, auctioneers, consultants, engineers, professional athletes, barbers, baseball clubs
and other sports organizations, chemists, psychologists, court reporters, dentists, doctors,
detectives, laboratory operators, teachers, veterinarians.
1. Meeting with customers or potential customers, even when no sales or orders are
solicited at the meetings.
m. Training or recruiting agents, representatives, independent contractors, brokers or
others, domiciled or operating on a job in the city, acting on its behalf, or for customers or
potential customers.
n. Investigating, resolving, or otherwise assisting in resolving customer complaints.
o. In-store stocking or manipulating products or goods, sold to and owned by a customer,
regardless of where sale and delivery of the goods took place.
p. Delivering goods in vehicles owned, rented, leased, used, or maintained by the person or
another acting on its behalf.
3. If a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another
acting on the person's behalf, engages in no other activities in or with the city but the following,
it need not register and obtain a business license:
a. Meeting with suppliers of goods and services as a customer.
b. Meeting with government representatives in their official capacity, other than those
performing contracting or purchasing functions.
c. Attending meetings, such as board meetings, retreats, seminars, and conferences, or
other meetings wherein the person does not provide training in connection with tangible
personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. This provision does not apply to any
board of directors member or attendee engaging in business such as a member of a board
of directors who attends a board meeting.
d. Renting tangible or intangible property as a customer when the property is not used in
the city.
e. Attending, but not participating in, a "trade show" or "multiple vendor events." Persons
participating at a trade show shall review the city's trade show or multiple vendor event
ordinances.
f. Conducting advertising through the mail.
g. Soliciting sales by phone from a location outside the city.
4. A seller located outside the city merely delivering goods into the city by means of common
carrier is not required to register and obtain a business license; provided, that it engages in no
Packet Pg. 431
8.4.b
other business activities in the city. Such activities do not include those in subsection (C)(3) of
this section.
The city expressly intends that engaging in business include any activity sufficient to establish nexus
for purposes of applying the license fee under the law and the Constitutions of the United States and
the state of Washington. Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the
activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts.
D. Rental Unit. The term "rental unit" shall mean a separate room or apartment leased for human
occupancy and contained within a single structure, and shall include the operations of rooming houses,
boarders within private residences and the operation of bed and breakfast establishments.
E. Private Residence. The term "private residence" shall mean a separate, freestanding structure leased
for residential purposes and human occupancy by one "family" as defined by ECDC 21.30.010.
F. Day. The term "day" when used in this chapter shall refer to days on which the city of Edmonds
City Hall is open for business. Any day which is defined as a holiday by ordinance and any day on
which City Hall has been closed by exee�.for business shall not constitute a "day."
G. Business Licensing Service. The term "Business Licensing Service" or "BLS" means the office
within the Washington State Department of Revenue providing business licensing services to the city
4.72.020 Business License Required.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, engage in or practice any business in the city of
Edmonds without first having obtained a business license from the city. If more than one business is
located on a single premises, a separate license shall be required for each separate business conducted,
operated, engaged in or practiced.
4.72.021 Threshold exemption.
To the extent set forth in this section, the following persons and businesses shall be exempt from the
registration, license and/or license fee requirements as outlined in this chapter:
A. Any person or business whose annual value of products, gross proceeds of sales, or gross income of
the business in the city is equal to or less than $12,000 and who does not maintain a place of business
within the city, i.e., a non-resident applicant, shall be exempt from the general business license
requirements in this chapter. The exemption does not apply to regulatory license requirements or
activities that require a specialized permit.
B. Nonprofit organizations or corporations with tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501(c)(3)
shall require a nonprofit business license but are exempt from a license fee.
4.72.023 Registration of transient accommodations.
Repealed by Ord. 3900.
4.72.030 Procedure.
Packet Pg. 432
8.4.b
A. Application for the business license shall be made to the Washington State Business Licensing
Service, and must include all information required for the licenses requested, and total fees due for all
licenses requested, as well as the handling fee required by RCW 19.02.075.
B. The administrative services director eity or designee shall receive all applications for city
business licenses. The administrative services director eity ele or designee shall cause an
investigation of the completed application to be made by the proper city officials and shall grant or
refuse to grant the license within 15 days of the date of receipt of the application information._
Applications may be referred to the planning and development services department, the fire
department, or other governmental agencies for their review. Compliance with building zoning and
other laws is the business owner's responsibility and issuance of a business license is not a ,guarantee
of compliance or a waiver of future enforcement by the city or other agencyjurisdiction. If an
application is refused, the reason for refusal shall be designated on the application. The application fee
shall not be refunded, except under the following circumstances:
1. An applicant requests cancellation of a license application from the city within five business
days of submitting an application to the Business Licensing Service.
4.72.040 Fee — Terms — Penalty.
A. Business licenses required to be obtained pursuant to this chapter expire on the date established by
the Business Licensing Service. The renewal application must be submitted to the Business Licensing
Service, and must contain all information that may be required for all licenses being renewed, and the
total fees due for all licenses being renewed, as well as the handling fee required by RCW 19.02.075.
B. The annual amounts of fees for the city business licenses issued hereunder shall be as follows:
1. The fee for an application for a new business license for any business that is not a home
occupation, as provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any real estate within the city
of Edmonds shall be $125.00;
2. The fee for an application for a new business license for a new home occupation business, as
provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any residential real estate within the city of
Edmonds shall be $100.00;
3. The fee for an application for a new business license for any other business conducted for,
under contract with or by providing services to any person within the city, to be operated in
locations outside the city limits, shall be $50.00; and
4. The fee for an application for an annual renewal of a city business license shall be $50.00 for
any business operated within the city of Edmonds.
5. A nonprofit business license application shall be exempt from a license fee; provided, that the
business provides proof of tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501(c)(3).
6. The term and respective fee amount for a license may be prorated to accommodate
synchronizing of the city license expiration date with the business license account expiration
date established by the Business Licensing Service.
Packet Pg. 433
8.4.b
C. All businesses required to renew licenses hereunder shall obtain the same and pay all fees required
on or before the expiration date established by the Business Licensing Service. Any business which
fails to renew and pay the license fees within said period of time shall, in addition to any other
penalties provided in this chapter, be assessed the penalty for such late application and/or payment
required by RCW 19.02.085. Failure to renew a license within 120 days after expiration will result in
the cancellation of the license. In order to continue business in the city, reapplication for the license is
required as provided in this chapter.
D. Repealed by Ord. 3036.
4.72.050 Ineligible activities.
Notwithstanding any provisions hereof to the contrary, a license hereunder may not be issued to any
person who uses or occupies or proposes to use or occupy any real property or otherwise conducts or
proposes to conduct any business in violation of the provisions of any ordinance of the city of
Edmonds or the statutes of the state of Washington. The granting of a business license shall in no way
be construed as permission or acquiescence in a prohibited activity or other violation of the law.
4.72.055 Denial of license — Hearing.
In the event that a license is denied under this chapter based on the provisions of ECC 4.72.050, or for
any other lawful reason, the applicant may request a hearing. Such request shall be in writing and filed
within 10 days of the date of written denial by the city of a license application. A hearing shall be
scheduled within 30 days before the hearing examiner. The hearing shall proceed in the following
format:
A. The applicant/appellant shall present proof of the nature of the activities which it seeks to conduct
pursuant to a business license in the city of Edmonds.
B. The city shall have the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the
activities are in violation of a provision of any ordinance of the city of Edmonds, or the general
statutes of the state of Washington.
C. The applicant/appellant may then present any rebuttal testimony which it wishes to present.
The hearing examiner shall enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. No motion for
reconsideration shall be available to either party. Appeal of the final decision shall be to the
Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the applicable laws of the state of Washington.
4.72.060 Revocation or suspension.
The mayor or his designee may, at any time, suspend or revoke any license issued hereunder whenever
the licensee or officer or partner thereof has been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of
violating any statute of the United States or the state of Washington or any ordinance of the city of
Edmonds upon the business premises stated in the license or in connection with the business stated in
the license; where the business activity violates ECC 4.72.050; or where the place of business does not
conform to the ordinances of the city of Edmonds. Prior to such suspension or revocation, the
permittee shall be provided an opportunity for a hearing. The licensee shall be notified in writing by
sending a written notice to the address stated on the license of the intention of the city to revoke or
Packet Pg. 434
8.4.b
suspend said license. The applicant may then appeal by filing written notice with the administrative
services director eity ele or designee within 10 days of the notice of revocation or suspension. The
administrative services director e or designee shall schedule a hearing within 20 days before
the hearing examiner. The licensee may appear at that time and be heard in opposition to such
revocation or suspension.
4.72.065 Transfer or sale of business — New license required.
Upon the sale or transfer of any business licensed by this chapter, the license issued to the prior owner
or transferor shall automatically expire on the date of such sale or transfer and the new owner
intending to continue such business in the city of Edmonds shall apply for a new business license
pursuant to the procedures established by this chapter.
4.72.070 Penalty for violation.
Any person, as defined herein, and the officers, directors, managing agents, or partners of any
corporation, firm, partnership or other organization or business violating or failing to comply with any
provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by
a fine in any sum not exceeding $250.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding nine months,
or both, and each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 7. Chapter 4.90 ECC (Public Markets), subsections .020, .050, .090, and .100,
are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike
4.90.020 Activities requiring a license.
It shall be unlawful for any person to own, use or permit property to be used as a public market until
the market and site have been licensed under this chapter. No person shall then sell or offer for sale
products at any location in conjunction with a market activity until sponsor has been duly licensed and
each vendor submitted to the city. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to authorize activities to be
conducted in accordance with the market's activities unless appropriately licensed as required under
another provision of this code; provided, however, that business license requirements are limited as
provided in ECC 4.90.050. A special event permit under Chapter 4.100 ECC and a City of Edmonds
business license under Chapter 4.72 ECC shall be required before a public market ma, begin
operating , pawnbrokers and dealers of seeandhand goods shall not eendtiet aefivifies in
Chapter- 4.72 EGG
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale goods at a public market unless such
person has been listed on the application fee of the licensee and paid the processing requirement
specified herein.
Packet Pg. 435
8.4.b
B. All structures employed on the site shall comply with the requirements of the State Building Code,
including but not limited to the Uniform Building and Fire Code elements.
C. The activities of the public market shall be limited to daylight hours on Saturday and Sunday of
each week within public rights -of -way, but extended hours are allowed up to 10:00 p.m. for any day of
the week if the market takes place outdoors on private property or public property not located within
public rights -of -way. Operational hours related to activities of the public market are not limited when
the market takes place within a fully enclosed building.
4.90.050 Sponsor licensee — Business license required when.
The sponsor of a market shall be required to obtain a City of Edmonds business license and a special
event permit before the market may begin operating. The issuanee of a p ub lie v.,.,f4wt heense to the
. . ntended to setwe as a master- lieense authorizing limited business aetivities. Vendors at the
markets renting or leasing space from the mastersponsor licensee are not required to have a city
business license unless they engage in other business activities subject to licensing under the
provisions of this title. By way of illustration and not limitation, a the following examples are o r-e :
B— A business license shall be obtained by any vendor who conducts business activities beyond the
premises licensed as a public market and/or outside of the time for which the license is issued. For
example, a business operating from a booth on the premises licensed as a public market during the
days of approved market operation shall not require a business license to conduct such activities. If,
however, the vendor conducts other business activities subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.72 ECC,
the person conducting such activities shall be duly licensed in accordance with the provisions of that
chapter.
4.90.090 Application for license.
Each applicant for a license to operate a public market shall file an application with the administrative
services director eity eleaccompanied by the license fee provided for in ECC 4.90.070. The
application shall be in writing and submitted on a form prepared by the administrative services director
eity elek and signed by the applicant. The application shall give the applicant's nonprofit
organization's business address and principal business location, a copy of documents indicating its
charitable nonprofit status as well as the residence address and phone number of the applicant's agent.
In addition to such other information as the administrative services director "shall require, the
application shall be accompanied by:
A. A plot plan showing the location of any outdoor facilities or activities. Adequate parking and
ingress and egress shall be maintained during the course of this temporary special event. Adequate
precautions shall be put in place to prevent vehicular access to pedestrian pathways within the confines
of the activity. Applications to utilize a site or lot already occupied by an existing business shall show
Packet Pg. 436
8.4.b
on the plot plan the location of all parking required to be provided under the provisions of Chapter
17.50 ECDC for such business.
B. A list of each and every vendor participating or anticipated to participate in the market for which
the license is sought shall be submitted to the administrative services director eit-y elerl£. The listing
shall include the vendor's name, address and business phone number together with a general
description of goods and/or services offered by each vendor. Any changes in the list of vendors shall
be provided to the administrative services director a in a minimum of three business days prior
to the date of the proposed change (i.e., the first date at which the new vendor will participate in the
market).
C. Provisions for event management and garbage control shall be addressed in a management plan. All
tables, tents, booths, signs and other structures associated with the market shall be removed from
public rights -of -way at the end of each day; provided, however, that approved outdoor storage may be
provided between the close of business the day a public market is held and commencement of business
the following morning on public land not located within public rights -of -way or on private property.
D. Garbage receptacles shall be strategically located and have sufficient capacity to accommodate the
vendors and estimated members of the public in attendance. In addition the area shall be kept clean of
rubbish, garbage, junk, waste paper, plastic, styrofoam cups, sacks, food and other waste. The city of
Edmonds encourages the use of recycling receptacles and products whenever possible. The license
holder shall be responsible to keep the area clean. The area to be kept clean shall include the area
immediately surrounding sidewalks and public streets.
E. Temporary signage announcing the event shall be approved on the site in the licensing process in
accordance with the requirements of ECDC 20.60.080.
F. The fire marshal shall designate appropriate fire lanes through the licensed area on the plot plan.
These fire lanes are intended for pedestrian use and shall be kept free of structures, debris or other
blockage. Failure to maintain appropriate fire lanes shall be cause for immediate revocation of the
license. The police chief may, in his or her sole discretion, require that security personnel be provided
by the public market during times and in a number designated by the police.
4.90.100 Records.
The named licensee sponsor of the public market shall maintain a record of all vendors participating in
the event. Such record shall be available for inspection by the administrative services director eit�-
eler-k or a designated agent during normal business hours of city offices (that is, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Section 8. Chapter 4.98 ECC (Constitutionally Protected Events) is hereby amended to
read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-rike ffifeegk):
Packet Pg. 437
8.4.b
Chapter 4.98
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EVENTS / EXPRESSIVE EVENTS
4.98.010 Definitions.
A. "Constitutionally protected events" or "expressive events" include any event, such as political or
religious activity, intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas, in which no fee or
donation is charged as a condition of participation or attendance, and that is to--4e conducted on public
property or on a public right-of-way; and, also, any such event held on private property which would
have a direct significant impact on traffic congestion or traffic flow to and from the event over public
streets or rights -of -way; or which would significantly impact public streets or rights -of -way near the
event; or which would significantly impact the need for city -provided emergency services, such as
police, fire or medical aid.
B. "Use" shall mean to construct, erect, or maintain in, on, over or under any street, right-of-way, park
or other public place any building, structure, sign, equipment or scaffolding, to deface any public right-
of-way by painting, spraying or writing on the surface thereof, or to otherwise occupy in such a
manner as to obstruct the normal public use of any public street, right-of-way, park or other public
place within the city, including a use related to special events.
4.98.020 Permit required.
A. A permit from the city is required for any constitutionally protected events or expressive events as
defined in this chapter. Such permit shall be in lieu of any other city permit, including but not limited
to special event, Tar-ade, street use and park use permits as they may be required by ordinance.
B. Contents of Application. The applicant must file the application in writing on a form supplied by
the city to the license officer, setting forth:
1. Contact information of the applicant, including but not limited to name, telephone number and
address;
2. The date, time, and expected duration of the event;
3. The probable number of participants;
4. The place or route of the event, including a map and written narrative of the proposed route;
5. A description of all public ways proposed to be blocked;
6. A description of the measures to be taken to protect participants and the general public from
injury, including traffic control and crowd control, emergency medical services, fire and life
safety services and emergency communication systems;
7. A description of the measures to be taken to ensure cleanup of any litter or damage resulting
from the event;
8. The number and location of portable sanitation facilities, if any;
Packet Pg. 438
8.4.b
9. A certification that the applicant will be financially responsible for any cost to the city
resulting from breach of any condition of the permit;
10. A certification that the applicant will not sponsor or encourage any commercial activity
unrelated to First Amendment rights during the event;
11. A description of the types and number of vehicles to be used in the special event;
12. Insurance and surety bond information, if any;
13. Any other additional information required to ensure public health, safety and welfare.
C. A constitutionally protected event permit is not required for the following:
1. Parades,
Parades of the military forces of the United
States of America or the State of Washington.
2. Funeral and wedding processions.
3. Groups required by law to be so assembled.
4. Gatherings of 25 N or fewer people in a city park, unless merchandise or services are offered
for sale or trade.
5. Other similar events and activities which do not directly affect or use city services of
property.
D. Any person desiring to obtain a constitutionally protected event permit shall apply for such a permit
by filing an application with the city at least 72 hours 69 days prior to the date on which the event is to
occur.
E. Waiver of Application Deadline.
1. Good Cause. Upon a showing of good cause or at the discretion of the city, the city shall
consider an application that is filed after the filing deadline if there is sufficient time to process and
investigate the application and obtain police and other city services for the event. Good cause can be
demonstrated by the applicant showing that the circumstance that gave rise to the permit application
did not reasonably allow the participants to file within the time prescribed.
2. Spontaneous Demonstration. The City shall waive the 72-hour application deadline in those
instances in which a permit is sought for a spontaneous demonstration responding to a local, national
or international event, within 72 hours after the event has occurred.
F. No Fee. No application or permit fee shall be required in order to obtain a permit for a
constitutionally protected event or expressive event.
Packet Pg. 439
8.4.b
4.98.030 Grounds for denial of application — Limited.
No permit shall be
denied by the citv except upon the following grounds: c
A. The event location or desired parade route conflicts with another event for which a permit has 14
already been issued; or as
B. The proposed event location or route would unreasonably prevent or block the provision of v
emergency services within the City of Edmonds or would unduly disturb the convenience of the public w
0
in the use of public streets and sidewalks. w
c
a)
In the event that a permit is denied for the reasons stated in subsection A or B of this section, the City E
of Edmonds shall work with the applicant to find an unencumbered time, date, location, or route C
suitable to the applicant. The requirement of a permit for constitutionally protected events or E
expressive events shall not be used or administered to prevent the exercise of free speech by any a
individual or group of individuals so long as the event or route is reasonable as to its time, place and
manner. It is the policy of the City of Edmonds to permit, encourage and promote the lawful exercise
of free speech by all of it citizens regardless of the content thereof. E
1. The appliea-at provides infefma4ion that is false, misleading, or- aene*istet4 ill a" material -W
a
c
m
detail; the applieant fails to eamplete the applieation or- to supply other- required infafmation or- >
documents; or the applicant declares or shows an unwillingness or inability to comply with the w
reasonableor-0 .�
m
a
- y
d
C�
J
3. The
dispdpt
the tr-af4e
proposed event would
tip&easenably
orderly or- safe eir-eulation of
as-V
rimer
w
would present an uflfeasenable
risk o€in�twy
or -damage
to the
4. The
in,
illegal dia thfeaten
++
proposed event would
engage advaeate,
or- eneoufage aetivities
NEW
4.98.040 Permit conditions — Appeal.
ns
L
the
f plaee and fnanner-
event, and stieh r-equir-efnefits as
of
Q
. ++
fell wing , n iti ns apply t all . nstit„ti,,n lly pr-eteeted
0 o
o ,mot ,. .-, .is.
t
c1.
t
(i
Alteration the titne, the
the
of plaee and manner- of event
pt:opesed on event applieation.
Q
Packet Pg. 440
8.4.b
ostri .ting the o fA t only . portion E) f the streetor-fight f way.
5. C mplianeev�,ith any other- applieable federal, state E)r- leeal law E)r- regulation.
B—. The applicant shall have the right to appeal the denial of a permit or a permit condition. A written
notice of appeal shall be filed within three business days after receipt or personal delivery of a notice
of denial or permit conditions from the city. Receipt of notice of denial or permit conditions shall be
presumed three days after the same is mailed with USPS postage prepaid and certified. The written
notice of appeal shall set forth the specific grounds for the appeal and attach any relevant documents
for consideration. The hearing examiner shall hear the appeal on the record provided from the
designated city official and upon public comment given at the scheduled hearing before the examiner.
The hearing shall be scheduled for the earliest possible hearing date after receipt of a timely and proper
notice of appeal. The decision of the hearing examiner shall be final.
4.98.050 Revocation of permits.
A. Any permit issued under this chapter may be summarily revoked by the city at any time when, by
reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency or exigent circumstances, the city
determines the safety of the public or property requires such immediate revocation. The city may also
summarily revoke any permit issued pursuant to this chapter if the city finds that the permit has been
issued based upon false information or when the permittee exceeds the scope of the permit or fails to
comply with any condition of the permit.
B. Notice of such action revoking a permit shall be delivered in writing to the permittee by personal
service or certified mail at the address specified by the permittee in the application. To the extent that
written notice by personal service or certified mail is not likely to achieve timely actual notice, any
other reasonable form of notification intended to achieve the same shall suffice.
preteeted event pem:iit pufsuant to this ehapter- unless a valid pemit has been issued and Fe i i
effeet for- the event. it is ttalawftil for- any per -son to pai4ieipa4e in stteh an event with the knowledge
tha4 the speaser- of the evef4 has not been issued a r-e"ir-ed, valid pefmit or- with knowledge that a
enee .,li,l p ,mit has expiredor- been r-evoked.
NOWN. OWN
Packet Pg. 441
8.4.b
dier-eef be to fine than
misdemeanor-, and upon eenvietion shall subjeet a penalty of a E)f not more
$500.00 E)r- by impfisenment of not more than 90 days, of both such fine and imprisonment.
-F
N
C
4.98.070 Savings clause.
J
If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this chapter is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
.r
validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.
v
U
W
0
Section 9. Anew Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) is hereby adopted to read as
follows:
d
E
Sections:
c
E
a
4.100.010 Purpose.
4.100.020 Definitions.
N
4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events.
4.100.040 Permit applications.
m
4.100.050 Indemnification.
a
4.100.060 Insurance.
4.100.070 Permit decision.
w
4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision.
w
4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events.
4.100.100 Cleanup deposit.
co
4.100.110 Suspension and revocation.
4.100.120 Exercise of police power.
y
4.100.130 Violation — Penalties.
d
J
4.100.010 Purpose.
U
U
W
It is the purpose of the City to establish a process for permitting special events that impact city right-
of-way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events
'
enhance the City of Edmonds communi and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of
~
,
venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental
5
services.
c
This Chanter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-wav regulations. to provide a
coordinated process for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special
events, and to ensure that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health,
safety or welfare. It is further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources,
prevent unplanned disruption of public services, mitigatepacts to the extent feasible and to create a
mechanism for cost recovery without haviniz an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the
community.
4.100.020 Definitions. °'
E
A. "City sponsored event" means a special event for which the city provides some level of sponsorship
and/or support to the primary event organizer/sponsor through the use of city funds, equipment, and/or a
other city resources that is not a "city contracted event." Citysponsored events may also be special
Packet Pg. 442
8.4.b
events that are organized and sponsored in full by the City of Edmonds. Reimbursement for cit
resources may be reauired.
m
B. "City contracted event" means a special event that typically takes places on an ongoing annual basis
and for which the City and the event organizer/sponsor enter into an event contract to apportion
responsibility for the event, thereby eliminating the need for the event organizer/sponsor to obtain a
special event permit under this Chapter. Such events may be sponsored in part by the ci . Examples of
,
city contracted events include the Garden Market/Summer Market, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July
celebration, Oktoberfest, and Taste Edmonds.
U
U
w
C. "Commercial special event" means an activity or occurrence sponsored and operated by one or more
o
businesses that is conducted primarily for the exchange of goods or services for financial gain.
Commercial special events typically occur upon private property. Examples of commercial special
d
events include parking lot sales and tent sales, promotional events, and sidewalk sales.
E
c
a)
D. `Emergency response plan" means a plan detailingthe he expected actions of event management and/or
a
public safety agencies in the event or threat of an emergency_
E. `Expressive event" or "Constitutionally protected event" means an activity or occurrence in which
the sole or principal purpose is the expression, dissemination, or communication of political or religious
E
opinion, views or ideas, and for which no fee or donation is charged or required as a condition of
a
participation or attendance. Examples of expressive special events include political rallies, marches,
c
public speeches, and political demonstrations. These events are regulated by Chapter 4.98.
w
F. "Fire marshal" means the city of Edmonds fire marshal or designee.
m
a
G. "Parade" means a type of special event involving an organized procession or march of more than 25
y
persons or 25 objects, or any combination thereof amounting to 25, that temporarily disnpts the general
public's normal use of public streets or sidewalks.
w
c
a�
H. "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated association,
organization, or other entity or group of persons, however organized.
U
U
w
I. "Private" or "private event" means an event where persons are specifically and individually invited.
It does not include an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public.
J. "Public" or "public event" means a special event open to the public, and includes an event where
tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public.
C
m
K. "Public amusement" means circuses, carnivals, motion picture shows, exhibitions, concerts, side
shows, plays and other stage shows, amusement parks and any other form of diversion, pastime or
recreation conducted for and open to the public regardless of whether an admission fee or other charge
is made for attendance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the licensingand nd inspection
of an activity conducted under the auspices of a bona fide, accredited elementary school, middle school, 0
high school or college and conducted on the premises thereof in facilities previously inspected and L
approved for public assembly_
L. "Right-of-way" means, within the City of Edmonds, all public right-of-way and property_ granted or m
reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for street purposes, together with public property granted or E
reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for walkwayss,paths, trails, sidewalks, and bikeways, whether
improved, unimproved, or unopened, including the air rights, sub -surface rights and easements related
thereto, and over which the City of Edmonds has authority and control. a
Packet Pg. 443
8.4.b
M. "Run" or "race" means a type of special event involving any race, contest or event, whether of a
competitive or a noncompetitive nature. involving a procession of persons. whether afoot or upon anv
vehicle or device propelled by the human body, including but not limited to marathons, fun runs,
m
walkathons, and bicycle races.
to
c
d
N. "Security" means employees, or other hired personnel, dedicated to maintaining order and ensuring
compliance with the laws of the state of Washington and ordinances of the city of Edmonds.
O. "Site" has the same meaning as set forth in ECDC 21.90.090, as now or hereafter amended, and in
.r
v
addition in the case of undeveloped property, a land area under common ownership, whether the land
v
w
area is comprised of one lot, a combination of contiguous lots, or contiguous fractions of lots.
o
N
r
P. "Special events" include any event which is to be conducted on public property or in a public right-
C
of -way; and also, any event held on private property which would have a direct significant impact on:
E
(a) traffic circulation to and from the event over public streets or rights -of -way_; (b)public streets or
C
rights -of -way near the event, or (c) the need for city -provided emergency services, such as police, fire
d
Q
or medical aid, as determined by the city. It is presumed that any event on private property which
involves: i an open invitation to the public to attend; or (b) anticipated attendance by private invitation
of 100 or more people is an event that will have a direct significant impact on the public streets, rights-
y
of -way or emergency services. Special events may include, but are not limited to: fun runs and walks,
E
auctions, parades, carnivals, exhibitions, film/movie events, circuses, outdoor markets, and fairs.
m
IL
Q. "Tent" means a temporary membrane structure or shelter, such as pop-up canopies, sails, and the like,
c
as defined in the current editions of the fire and buildingcodes.
w
4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events.
a
CO
A. Permit Required. Any person desiring to conduct or operate a special event within the City of
m
Edmonds shall first obtain a special event permit from the city, unless specifically exempt. It shall be
c
unlawful for any_person to sponsor or conduct an event or activity requiring a special event permit
without a valid special event permit. Penalties for violation of the terms of this chapter shall be as
specified by this chapter.
v
w
B. Consistency with Permit and Law. A special event shall be conducted as described by the special
event permit, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit and in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations. am
C. Public and Personal Safety. The configuration and operation of special events shall conform to
applicable laws and regulations, including provisions relating to emergency ingress and egress, barrier -
free facilities, fire prevention, health and sanitation, and the operation of vehicles and equipment.
D. Business Licenses and Taxes. As required by pplicable law, special event businesses/vendors shall
have City of Edmonds business licenses and shall record, report and remit taxes.
E. Exemptions. The following activities and occurrences shall comply with applicable laws and L
regulations, but are exempt from the permit requirements of this chapter:
c
m
1. City contracted events. E
2. Funerals and wedding processions.
a
Packet Pg. 444
8.4.b
3. Garage sales and rummage sales.
4. Neighborhood block parties.
N
C
5. Special event facilities. Events conducted at a facility designed for special event purposes or
at facilities where such events are normally held, such as churches, event centers, convention j
centers, schools, athletic fields, auditoriums, stadiums, theaters, and the like.
d
.r
6. Governmental activities. Activities conducted by a governmental agency acting within the v
scope of its authority. U
w
0
7. Regularly scheduled events utilizing park and recreation facilities, in accordance with the
intended use of the facility, and with park rules and policies.
E
8. A privately scheduled, non -reoccurring event upon private property in a residential zone with
d
up to 100 persons attending. Q
9. The temporary sale of seasonal goods when regulated by other statutes, such as Christmas tree
sales, and peddling of farm produce.
E
10. Expressive events (but see Chapter 4.98 for regulations pertaining to o expressive events). a
F. Signs.
w
1. With a special event permit application, applicants may request, and the appropriate director or
designee that would otherwise authorize such signage may authorize, the use of temporary on -site a
(on -premises) and off -site (off -premises) signs. W
2. Special event signs shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity of the sign. Signs shall not obstruct visibili , for
motorists and pedestrians, nor impede access to buildings or property. The installation of signs
upon public property shall be subject to inspection by the building official and/or city engineer. v
U
w
3. The applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance, and removal of all signs.
4.100.040 Permit applications. m
A. The administrative services director or designee is authorized to prepare and maintain necessary
application forms and may issue written administrative policies and procedures as needed for the
implementation of this chapter.
B. Applications for special event permits shall be submitted to the administrative services director or
designee, a minimum of 60 days prior to a small event (less than 100 people) and a minimum of 90 dam
prior to a major event(more than 100 people). If an event organizer fails to meet these timelines, the O
application may still be processed if all affected departments agree process the application within the L
shortened timeframe. Factors in determining whether to allow for processing a late application will o
include the impact on city resources and rights -of -way, and conflicts with other already scheduled
events. m
E
C. Applications for special event permits shall include written authorization of the property owner. For
special events proposed upon city -owned property, the approval of a special event permit application a
Packet Pg. 445
8.4.b
shall constitute city authorization to conduct the event upon the property described in the permit
application.
N
m
D. Applications for special event permits shall be on forms prepared by the administrative services
director or designee and shall include information that any city department processing the application
deems necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to enable it to review the
application. The information requested shall enable the city to assess the scope of the event so as to
evaluate the impact of the event on city resources and the community.
c�
E. Application fee(s) for special event permits are set forth in the Ci . 's adopted fee schedule. v
w
0
4.100.050 Indemnification. w
c
d
Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant and authorized officer of the E
sponsoring_ organization must agree to reimburse the city, fly costs incurred by it in repairing damage
a�
to cily property and indemnify and defend the city, its officers, employees, and agents from all causes E
of action, claims or liabilities occurring in connection with the permitted event, except those which occur
due to the city's sole negligence.
N
4.100.060 Insurance. E
L
a)
Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant shall comply with the following c
insurance requirements:
w
(1) The permit applicant shall obtain commercial general liability insurance in amounts acceptable
to the city attorney's office. 0.
Co
(2) Written proof of such insurance is required prior to permit issuance. The insurance policy shall y
be written on an occurrence basis, shall name the city as an additional insured using ISO form CG
20 26, or coverage at least as broad, and shall be written for a period that includes the timeframe for
both the set-u before and the clean -Lip following the com letion of the event. The a licant shall J
p p p � v
provide the city and all additional insureds for this event with written notice of any v
w
cancellation within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice.
m
(3) Liquor Liability Coverage. Liquor liability coverage must be obtained when liquor is served as ~
a part of a special event permitted under this chapter.
(a) A vendor hired b, t�pecial event permittee to serve liquor must provide evidence of liquor
liability coverage in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office, namingthe he city as additional
insured. This insurance coverage is in addition to the special event permittee's overall general
liabili . requirement.
(b) A special event permittee serving liquor directly shall obtain host liquor coverage as a part of
providing commercial general liability insurance per subsection (1) of this section. o
4.100.070 Permit decision.
E
A. After receiving a�completed application in conformance with this chapter, along with the non-
refundable permit application fee, the administrative services director or designee shall consult with all a
affected divisions or departments, such as Building, Planning, Engineering, Police, Fire, Public Works,
Packet Pg. 446
8.4.b
Parks and Recreation, Finance, and Risk Management. Following consultation with all affected
departments and divisions. the administrative services director or designee may approve. conditionallv
gpprove, or deny an gpplication for a special event permit based upon the provisions of this chapter.
m
When an application is conditionally approved or denied, the administrative services director or designee
c
shall provide written explanation of the for the conditions of approval or denial, and the
,grounds
applicant's rightof ppeal pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
d
B. Decision criteria. A permit may be issued to an applicant only if all the following criteria and
conditions for issuance are met:
v
c�
w
1. The special event will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare;
o
N
r
2. The special event will not be injurious to property or improvements in the immediate vicinity
C
of the special event;
E
c
3. The special event will not endanger participants, spectators, or the public;
a)
E
4. The special event has a traffic management plan or other adequate and appropriate measures
in place to mitigate any traffic safety and mobility issues, including for both vehicles and
pedestrians;
E
L
5. Adequate and appropriate sanitation and refuse facilities are planned;
a)
a
c
m
6. The special event has adequate and appropriate measures in place to ensure the safe movement,
w
assemblage and dispersion of people attending the event. Such measures may include the use of
safely guardrails, fences, ropes, barricades, and the like;
a
7. The special event will not cause excessive or harmful fumes, odor, smoke, noise or light and
must be consistent with Chapter 5.30 entitled "Noise Abatement and Control";
d
8. The special event will comply with all applicable ordinances relating to food service containers
and utensils and provide for the appropriate collection and disposal of waste, recycling, and
v
compostables;
w
9. Adequate plans exist to return the area or routes impacted b. t�pecial event to the same
m
condition or cleanliness as existed prior to the event;
10. Applicant has agreed to the indemnity and hold harmless provisions in the application;
11. Applicant has provided proof of the requisite insurance provisions in the application;
12. For citysponsored events, applicant has agreed to reimburse the city for the provision of
additional city services, including but not limited to the employment of police officers to direct
or block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or the provisions of standby aid car or fire protection
services, as required.
4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision. m
E
Decisions of the administrative services director or designee are appealable. An appeal of the
administrative services director or designee's decision related to application of this chapter may be filed a
Packet Pg. 447
8.4.b
with the administrative services director or designee within 10 business days of notification of the
decision. Such anneal shall be filed and processed in accordance with the anneal provisions for business
licenses as provided by Chapter 4.72. The meal filing fee shall be as specified by the fee schedule.
m
N
4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events.
C
a)
J
A. Upon approval of a special event permit application for a city sponsored event, the administrative
services director or designee shall provide the applicant with a statement of the estimated cost of
providing city resources, such as personnel and equipment, for the special event, if applicable. The
v
aqpplicant%sponsor of the event may be required to prepay these estimated costs ten (1 O) dgys prior to the
v
w
special event. The special event application fee per the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city
o
council is a separate processing fee and is not applicable to the city services fees. City resources may
4
include the use of police officers and public employees for traffic and crowd control; pickup and delivery
d
of traffic control devices, picnic tables, and the like; extraordinary street sweeping; and any other needed,
E
requested or required city service, along with the cost of operating any equipment needed to provide
C
such services.
E
a
B. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the dates of the city sponsored event is less than
cw
the estimated cost, the applicant/sponsor will be refunded the difference by the city in a timely manner.
If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the dates of the city sponsored event is than
E
,greater
the estimated cost, the city will invoice the applicant/sponsor for the difference, and the invoice shall be
a
paid in a timely manner.
C
w
C. Permit fees and fees for the use of city resources may be waived in part or in full by the city if, in
ia
review of the application, it is found that the city sponsored event is of sufficient public benefit to warrant
the expenditure of city funds without reimbursement b, the he applicant/sponsor and would not result in
CO
the private financial gain of any individual or "for -profit" entity.
w
m
4.100.100 Cleanup deposit.
N
aCi
J
A. The applicant/sponsor of a special event likely to create a substantial need for cleanup may be
v
required to provide a cleanup deposit prior to the issuance of a special event permit.
w
B. The cleanup deposit may be returned after the event if the area used for the permitted event has been
cleaned and restored to the same condition as existed prior to the event within twenty-four (24,) hours
~
after the conclusion of the event.
5
C. If the property used for the event has not been properly cleaned or restored within twenty-four (24)
hours after the conclusion of the event, the applicant/sponsor shall be invoiced for the actual cost to the
city for cleanup and restoration, which invoice shall be paid in a timely manner. The cleanup deposit
shall be applied toward the payment of the invoice.
4.100.110. Suspension and revocation.
A. In instances in which the special event does not comely with the provisions of this chanter, the terms "
and conditions of the approved permit, or other applicable law, the administrative services director or C
m
designee may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit with the issuance of written findings. E
B. When necessary to prevent serious injury to persons, property or the public peace, health, safety or a
welfare, the administrative services director or designee, fire marshal, building official, development
Packet Pg. 448
8.4.b
services director or chief of police, or the designee of each, may suspend or revoke an approved special
event permit effective immediately. The city official or designee shall deliver written notice of
suspension or revocation to the permit applicant/event sponsor or manager.
4.100.120 Exercise of police Dower.
This chapter is enacted as an exercise of the cily's police powers and shall not be construed to impose
any duty owed by the city to any permittee under this chapter or to any member of the public, nor shall
any permit be construed as waiver of any violation of the laws of the city.
4.100.130 Violation — Penalties.
A. It shall be a misdemeanor for M person to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or the
conditions imposed upon any permit issued hereunder, which shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed
one thousand dollars ($1,000,) or imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) dgys. Each day, or part thereof,
during which any such violations occur or are continued, shall constitute a separate offense.
B. In addition, permits issued hereunder shall be subject to suspension or revocation as provided herein,
and civil abatement proceedines as set forth in Chanter 20.110 ECDC.
C. In addition, or alternatively, M person violating the provisions of this chapter or the conditions of
any permit issued hereunder shall also subject the permittee to a daily civil penalty in the amount
specified by Chanter 20.110 ECDC.
D. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of the chapter or the conditions of
any permit issued hereunder may forfeit their right to hold a special event in the city.
Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 11. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days
after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 449
8.4.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
:•
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 450
8.4.b
Ordinance No.
as follows:
On the
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
day of 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
_. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF OR AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN
CHAPTERS OF TITLE 4 ECC (LICENSES) AND FOR THE ADOPTION
OF A NEW CHAPTER TO TITLE 4 ECC RELATING TO SPECIAL
EVENT PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of
2022.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 451
8.4.c
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY'S
DEVELOPMENT -RELATED FEES AND CHARGES TO ADD FEES
RELATING TO THE CITY'S SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS.
WHEREAS, ECDC 15.00.020 provides for the establishment and amendment of certain fees
charged by the city by resolution; and
WHEREAS, extensive effort has been made by city staff to analyze the full costs associated with
city permitting and service activities; and
WHEREAS, the city council has previously established and affirms as its goal that permit fees
shall be set to cover the costs of processing and issuing permits and requests for service; and
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 1475 in June 2021, which adopted a schedule of
fees to be charged in relation to permit issuance and other development activity; and
WHEREAS, the city council has adopted Ordinance to document in the Edmonds City
Code the requirements for obtaining permits from the city to hold Special Events; and
WHEREAS, city staff has established the costs associated with issuing such permits; and
WHEREAS, this resolution is intended to add the new Special Event Permit fees to the city's
schedule of fees and to replace Resolution 1475; now therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The fees and charges for services set forth in the schedule attached as Exhibit A
to this Resolution, which is incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted, along with
the referenced tables which are also included therein, and shall be effective on and after
, 2022.
Section 2. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution or any fee or charge
for service adopted or amended hereby should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase, or any fee or charge adopted or
amended hereby.
Section 3. Resolution 1475 shall have no further effect as of , 2022 as
the fees adopted by Resolution 1475 are being replaced by the fees adopted herein.
Packet Pg. 452
8.4.c
RESOLVED this day of 2022.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
2
Packet Pg. 453
I 8.4.c I
FEES ASSOCIATED WITH
DEVELOPMENT
:j
OV
E DA,
Building — Engineering — Planning - Fire
121 5t" Ave N, Edmonds WA 98020
425.771.0220
Approved fees effective January 1, 2022; ENG updated July 6'h, 2021
Page 1 of Y 11
Packet Pg. 454
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT FEES
I 8.4.c I
Building / Planning / Engineering / Fire
City Technology Fee for each permit application
Credit Card Transaction Fee .................................
Development Review Committee Meeting ...................................................
Pre -Application Meeting................................................................................
(50% applied toward future plan check fee for that specific project only)
Recording Fee (for recording documents with Snohomish County)
Violation Compliance Fee
$40.00
..... 3%
............$0
$1,000.00
Recording Cost + $110.00
$250.00 or up to 5x Permit Fee
Residential State Building Code Surcharge Fee........................................................................................ $6.50
..................................................................................................................... Each additional dwelling unit $2.00
Commercial State Building Code Surcharge Fee..................................................................................... $25.00
..................................................................................................................... Each additional dwelling unit $2.00
(not applicable to certain minor permits such as plumbing, mechanical, re -roof)
PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEES:
Plan review is calculated at 85% of the building permit fee and includes up to 3 reviews per division/ department.
Commercial/ Multi -family/ Residential: Plan review fee includes Building, Planning, Fire & Engineering reviews
General plan review fee per reviewing department/division.........................................$110.00/hr (1 hr min.)
plus peer review fee if applicable
Plan review for re -submittals after the 3rd review............................................................................$110.00/hr
Development Project Peer Review (Peer Review).................................................................................. $110.00
plus cost of consultant review fee charged for outside consultant peer review services when
City staff lacks the expertise to review a specific project or aspect of a project.
General Inspection Fee per department/division
Re -Inspection Fee .................................................
$110.00/ea
$110.00/ea
Engineering Inspection Fee*..............................................................................3.3% of Value of Improvements
*Applies to Civil Site Improvements, such as Subdivisions, Commercial & Multi -Family Permits
Stormwater Engineer Review Fee.....
Transportation Engineer Review Fee
Utility Engineer Review Fee ..............
REFUNDS:
$130.00/hr
$130.00/hr
$130.00/hr
The City may authorize refunding of any permit fee paid which was erroneously paid or collected. The City
may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done
under a permit issued in accordance with the applicable code(s). The City may also refund not more than 80
percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been
paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. Refunds shall not be granted of any fee on
an expired permit. Any application for a refund must be made in writing and describe the circumstances to
justify. Refunds for permit fees covered by 19.70.025 ECDC may be authorized by the Building Official. The
Planning Manager may authorize refunds of Planning fees or service charges. The City Engineer may
authorize refunds of Engineering fees or service charges.
Page 2 of 1''
Packet Pg. 455 1
I 8.4.c I
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Accessory Dwelling Unit Compliance(ADU).............................................................................................$405.00
Adult Family Home Compliance (AFH).....................................................................................................$550.00
Alternate Methods Review..........................................................................................
$110.00/hr+ Peer Review
Appeal of Building Official Interpretation.................................................................................................$970.00
Cellular Communication and Facilities......................................................................................................
TABLE 1
Changeof Use............................................................................................................................................
$510.00
Demolition (Residential Primary Structure)..............................................................................................$300.00
Demolition (Commercial Primary Structure)............................................................................................
$500.00
Demolition (Secondary Structure or Interior Only)...................................................................................
$150.00
Dock/Marina/Floats..................................................................................................................$200.00+TABLE
1
Fence..........................................................................................................................................................$100.00
Hot Tub/Spa (Single-Family)......................................................................................................................$200.00
Manufactured Coach Installation - Commercial (Federal HUD Label)....................................................$500.00
Manufactured Home Installation (Federal HUD Label)............................................................................$550.00
ParkingLot.................................................................................................................................$200.00+TABLE
1
Re -roof (Commercial).......................................................Valuation based on $2.00
per square foot +TABLE 1
Re -roof (Residential - includes sheathing)................................................................................................
$100.00
Retaining Wall (Commercial)............................................................................................
$740.00 + Peer Review
Retaining Wall (Residential)..............................................................................................
$300.00 + Peer Review
Solar/Photovoltaic (Residential)................................................................................................................$120.00
Solar/Photovoltaic (Commercial) - Valuation does not include cost of solar panels or inverters......... TABLE 1
Swimming Pool (Pre -manufactured, above ground)................................................................................$120.00
Swimming Pool (In-Ground)......................................................................................................................
TABLE 1
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (Commercial Only — valid for 60 days) .........................................
$330.00
SIGNS:
Sign (Per sign excluding specific sign categories listed below)................................................................ $165.00
Blade Sign (Includes all blade signs in proposal)............................................................................................... $0
Pedestrian Sign (Includes all pedestrian signs in proposal)....................................................................... $80.00
PoleSign (per sign).................................................................................................................................... $825.00
Murals (Includes all murals in a proposal)................................................................................................ $165.00
*Planning ADB Design Review may apply
ESLHA DESIGNATED PROPERTIES:
Additional fees associated with development in the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA)
ESLHA Administrative Fee
ESLHA Consultant Review
Deposit at Application for Peer Completeness Review .........
Deposit at Full Application......................................................
Deposit at Re -submittal if additional Peer Review is needed
ESLHA Minor Project Administrative Processing Fee .................
ESLHA Submittal Packet...............................................................
............................................... $ 2, 385.00
Full cost of review is paid by applicant.
................................................. $500.00
............................................... $2,500.00
............................................... $1,500.00
.................................................. $ 300.00
................................................... $15.00
Page 3 of 1?
Packet Pg. 456 1
I 8.4.c I
MECHANICAL PERMITS:
BASEPERMIT FEE: ...................................................................................................................................... $50.00
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE:
For the installation or relocation of each:
FURNACE - Forced -air or gravity -type, including ducts and appliance vents.........................................$30.00
AIR HANDLER- Including ducts (Diffusers, blowers, etc.)
Up to and including 10,000 cfm (4719 L/s).......................................................................................$30.00
Over 10,000 cfm (4719 L/s) including ducts......................................................................................$40.00
GAS HEATER -Suspended, recessed wall or floor -mounted unit...........................................................$30.00
HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM..................................................................................................................$150.00
APPLIANCE VENT - (Type B, BW, L gas vent, etc.).................................................................................... $15.00
INCINERATOR....................................................................................................................................... $50.00
VENTILATION AND EXHAUST
Fan connected to single duct (Bath, laundry, kitchen exhaust, etc.)...............................................$15.00
Each system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system .............................. $15.00
HOOD - Type 1, Type 2, Fume Hood including ducts............................................................................$150.00
GAS PIPING: (New or relocated)
Gas -Piping systems of 1 to 5 outlets........................................................................................................ $30.00
Each additional outlet over 5..................................................................................................................... $5.00
BOILER OR COMPRESSOR
Up to and including 50 HP (176 KW)........................................................................................................$50.00
Over 50 HP (176 kW)...............................................................................................................................$100.00
ABSORPTION SYSTEM, AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM OR HEAT PUMP
Up to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW)................................................................................... $50.00
Over 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW)..........................................................................................................$100.00
OTHER FEES:
Commercial Plan review hourly fee..................................................................................................$110.00/hr
Each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the IMC for which no other
fee is listed (Fire dampers, ductless mini- split systems, etc.)............................................................ $30.00
Page 4 of 1?
Packet Pg. 457 1
I 8.4.c I
PLUMBING PERMITS:
BASE PERMIT FEE: .................................................................................................................................... $50.00
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE:
For the installation, alteration, repair, addition or relocation of each: ......................................................... $15.00
Plumbing fixture (on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap)
Drain w/in footprint of building (rainwater systems, roof deck drains, etc.)
Water Heater (includes expansion tank)
Re -pipe - Drain, vent or water piping (each fixture served)
Water Service Line (replacement or repair)
For the installation, alteration, repair, addition or relocation of each:
Water treating equipment (water softener)............................................................................................$35.00
Backflow protective device - 2" and smaller...........................................................................................$35.00
Backflow protective device - Over 2".......................................................................................................$45.00
Graywater system or reclaimed water system (in addition to fixture fee)
............................................$65.00
Non -grease waste pre-treatment interceptor (oil/waterseparator, etc.)
...........................................$110.00
Medical gas piping system serving 1 to 5 inlet/outlet(s) for a specific gas
..........................................$110.00
Each additional medical gas inlet/outlet...............................................................................................$15.00
Grease Trap (HGI Inside Building)............................................................................................................$220.00
Gravity Grease Interceptor(GGI))...........................................................................................................$770.00
OTHER FEES:
Commercial plan review fee hourly fee............................................................................................$110.00/hr
IMPACT FEES
PARK IMPACT FEES:
Single -Family .............................
Multi -Family ..............................
Non -Residential Development
Residential Administrative Fee .
Commercial Administrative Fee
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES:
$2,734.05 per Dwelling Unit
$2,340.16 per Dwelling Unit
..........$1.34 per square foot
................................... $ 50.00
................................ $100.00
Refer to City Code & Handouts to calculate impact fee. The following applies in addition to impact fee:
Residential Administrative Fee..................................................................................................................$50.00
Commercial Administrative Fee.............................................................................................................. $100.00
Independent Fee Calculation —Transportation Engineer Review........................................................ $260.00
plus peer review fee as applicable.
Page 5 of 1?
Packet Pg. 458 1
I 8.4.c I
GRADING PERMIT FEES
PLAN REVIEW:
CUBIC YARDS
PLAN REVIEW FEE
50 cubic yards or less
$55.00
(when located in a designated critical area)
51 to 100 cubic yards
$110.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
$220.00
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
$440.00
$440.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00 for
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
each additional 10,000 yards or fraction thereof.
$1,430.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards
for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
200,001 cubic yards or more
$2,530.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00
for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
PERMIT FEE:
CUBIC YARDS
PERMIT FEE
Base Permit Fee
$35.00
50 cubic yards or less
$110.00
(when located in a designated critical area)
51 to 100 cubic yards
$110.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
$110.00 for the first 100 cubic yards, plus $25.00 for each
additional 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof.
$335.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $45.00 for each
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
additional 1,000 cubic yards, or fraction thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
$740.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $65.00 for
each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
$1,325.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $100.00 for
100,001 cubic yards or more
each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
Page 6 of 12
Packet Pg. 459 1
I 8.4.c I
FIRE PERMIT FEES
FIRE SPRINKLER PERMITS:
Residential IRC Structures
New Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems................................................................................................. $300.00
Residential Fire Sprinkler System Alteration..........................................................................................$200.00
Commercial & Multi -Family Fire Sprinkler Systems
Newsystems........................................................................................................................... $300.00 + TABLE 1
Modifications:
1 to 5 sprinklers........................................................................................................................................$250.00
6 to 25.......................................................................................................................................................
$500.00
26 or more..............................................................................................................................
$300.00 + TABLE 1
Additional inspections/plan review as required................................................................................$110.00/hr
FIRE ALARM PERMITS:
New fire alarm system...........................................................................................................
$300.00 + TABLE 1
Emergency Responders Radio System(DAS)........................................................................
$100.00 + TABLE 1
Modifications:
1 to 5 initiating devices, Communicator (AES, Cellular).......................................................................
$250.00
6 to 25, including panel replacement.....................................................................................................$500.00
26 or more..............................................................................................................................
$300.00 + TABLE 1
Additional inspections/plan review as required................................................................................$110.00/hr
TANK PERMITS:
Residential fill, remove or install (per each)...........................................................................................$200.00
Commercial fill, remove or install (per each).........................................................................................$450.00
OTHER FIRE PERMITS:
Fire Suppression Systems:
Commercial Hood Suppression System (per system)......................................................................$325.00
Standpipe............................................................................................................................................
$450.00
FireConnection........................................................................................................................................$500.00
FireOperational......................................................................................................................................$100.00
Fire fees include plan review and inspections.
Page 7 of 1?
Packet Pg. 460 1
I 8.4.c I
PLANNING AND LAND USE FEES
GENERAL:
Type I (Staff decisions, no notice)............................................................................................................. $275.00
Type 11 A (Staff decisions with notice)....................................................................................................... $970.00
Type I I IA (ADB / Hearing Examiner)............................................................. Hearing Examiner Cost + $2,000.00
Type I I I B (Hearing Examiner)........................................................................ Hearing Examiner Cost + $2,000.00
Type IV (Rezone, Development Agreement)..........................................................................................$7,000.00
Type V (Plan & Edmonds Community Development Code Amendments) ............................................ $7,000.00
LotLine Adjustment................................................................................................................................$1,050.00
Short Subdivision Preliminary Approval................................................................................................$3,225.00
Short Subdivision Civil Plan Review.......................................................................................................$3,050.00
Short Subdivision Final Approval...........................................................................................................$1,590.00
Subdivision Preliminary Approval................................................................
Hearing Examiner Cost + $6,510.00
Subdivision Civil Plan Review.................................................................................................................$4,670.00
Subdivision Final Approval....................................................................................................................$1,590.00
ModificationRequest................................................................................................................................$970.00
Minor Change to Approved Plat...............................................................................................................
$275.00
Major Change to Approved Plat.......................................................................
Same as Original Application Fee
PRD Preliminary Approval......................................................................................................................$6,510.00
PRDFinal Approval.................................................................................................................................$1,590.00
ADB Design Review —Signs ....................................................................................................................... $970.00
Staff Design Review if project exceeds SEPA threshold........................................................................... $970.00
Landscape Plan Inspection Fee......................................................................................................1% of Estimate
SEPAReview...............................................................................................................................................$740.00
SEPA Planned Action Compliance Review (Hwy 99)................................................................................$275.00
EISReview........................................................................................................................................................ Cost
Outdoor Dining, Amateur Radio............................................................................................................... $275.00
Critical Areas Checklist Application...........................................................................................................$110.00
Critical Areas Checklist Update...................................................................................................................$55.00
Critical Areas Variance / Reasonable Use Application ................................ Hearing Examiner Cost + $7,640.00
Critical Areas Study Admin................................................................................................ $110.00/hr (min. 1 hr)
Critical Areas Contingent Review (See ECDC 23.40.195 for more detail on fees).................................$970.00
Shoreline Contingent Review (See ECDC 24.80.100)...............................................................................$970.00
Planning Fee not categorized
Request for Reconsideration.
$110.00/hr
..... $275.00
Note: When an application is heard by the Hearing Examiner (HE), the cost of the hearing is billed to the applicant.
APPEALS:
Appeal of Staff Decision (Type I, II or Hearing Examiner)
Appeal of Type IIIB Decision to City Council .....................
Appeal of Notice of Civil Violation ....................................
ADB = Architectural Design Board
HE = Hearing Examiner
SEPA = State Environmental Policy Act
$450.00
$550.00
$970.00
EIS = Environmental Impact Statement
PRD = Planned Residential Development
Page 8of1�
Packet Pg. 461 1
I 8.4.c I
ENGINEERING FEES
MISCELLANEOUS FEES:
Backflow Prevention Compliance Fee .................................................... $165.00
Developers Agreements..........................................................................
$220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees
Fire/Aid Sign Address Fabrication Fee...............................................$100.00/ea
Street Sign Fabrication Fee.................................................................$200.00/ea
Water and Sewer Availability Letters...................................................$65.00/ea
Latecomers Agreement............................................................................
$220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees
LID Sewer Agreement..............................................................................
$220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees
Variance from Underground Wiring .......................................................
$330.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees
Special Event Permit Fee (small event /
less than 100 people) ............ $50.00/ea
Special Event Permit Fee (major event
/ more than 100 people) ........... $125/ea
GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES:
• Water GFC's are based on meter size:
Water and sewer GFC's shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the utility systems.
Storm GFC's shall be paid by the applicant for ESU's added or created by development.
Meter Size General Facility Charge
%" $5,050.00
1" $12, 624.00
11/2 " $25,248.00
2" $40,397.00
GFC's for Single Family Residences only: Fee is based on meter size required for domestic demand (typically %")
GFC shall not be based on meter upsizing for fire sprinkler system only.
Sewer Utility GFC............................................................. $4,417.00 per ERU
A single family residential development = 1.0 ERU per dwelling unit
A multifamily residential development = .67 ERU per dwelling unit
Applicants for non-residential development shall pay a GFC equal to the ERU determination that is made by
the Public Works Director.
Stormwater Management GFC..........................................$799.00 per ESU
A single family residential development with up to 5,000 sf hard surface area = 1.0 ESU
All other construction calculated according to a ratio of 1.0 ESU per 3,000 sq ft of new, replaced or new
plus replaced impervious surface area.
Page 9 of 12
Packet Pg. 462 1
I 8.4.c I
RIGHT-OF-WAY FEES:
Right -of -Way Construction Permit....................................$330.00 + Inspection Fees
Right -of -Way Construction Permit —Small Wireless .......... $330.00 + $110/hour for any portion of an hour after the
first three hours of staff review time + City Attorney Fees for legal review (if necessary) + Inspection Fees
Right -of Way Minor Construction Permit .......................$110.00 + Inspection Fees
Street Restoration for Water Meter Installation .........$1,000.00 + Street Overlay Cut Penalty Fee if applicable
Street Overlay Cut Penalty Fee.......................................$220.00 + ROW Permit Fees
+ Add'I per SQYD charge times overlay cut multiplier
Encroachment Permit......................................................$330.00 + Recording Fees
Street Use Permit..............................................................$110.00 + Bistro Dining Fees if applicable
Bistro Dining Fees...............................................................$30.00 Annual Fee + Monthly ROW Use Fee
@ $0.50/ SO. FT x 12.84% (leasehold tax)
Alley, Sidewalk, Parking Disruption/ Closure Fees ..........$220.00 + ROW Permit + Monthly Closure Fees
Closure fees charged for any activity that occupies or closes, sidewalks, parking spaces(s), parking lanes(s) or
other paved area of a street/road for more than 72 hours. Monthly portion of Fee [$ per month] = 1% of
assessed value per square foot of abutting property x right of way area [SF] disrupted/closed. If
disruption/closure affects any portion of the area of a parking space, the area of disruption closure is calculated
based upon the area of a full parking space.
SEWER FEES:
New Commercial & Multi -Family
New Single Family ........................
Repair - Full Line Replacement ....
Repair - Partial Line Replacement
Special Conditions (Grinder Pumps, Ejectors)
Drainage Permit (Pool, Hot Tub, Jacuzzi).......
STORMWATER FEES:
Stormwater Permit
WATER METER FEES:
General
$220.00 + Inspection Fees Facility
$110.00 + Inspection Fees Charges May
Apply
$110.00 + Inspection Fees
$110.00 (Includes 1 inspection
+Add'I Inspection Fees, if applicable)
$110.00 + Sewer Fees + Utility Engineer Review
.. $55.00 Each Occurrence
$330.00 +General Inspection Fees
Meter Size
Meter Fee
Installation of New Service & Meter* 3/4"
$2,920.00
1"
$2,970.00
1%"
$6,220.00
2"
$6,390.00
*General Facility Charges may apply
GFC = General Facility Charge ESU = Equivalent Service Unit
ROW = Right of Way ERU = Equivalent Residential Unit
Page 10 of 1?
Packet Pg. 463 1
I 8.4.c I
ICC VALUATION TABLE
August 2021
Adopted by City of Edmonds effective Jan 1, 2022
Group (2021 International Building Code)
IA
IB
IIA
116
IIIA
IIIB
IV
VA
VB
A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage
298.55
288.43
280.93
269.54
253.09
245.77
260.87
235.34
226.84
A-1 Assembly, theaters, without stage
273.51
263.39
255.89
244.51
228.06
220.73
235.84
210.31
201.80
A-2 Assembly, nightclubs
233.39
226.42
220.85
211.80
199.64
194.14
204.26
180.65
174.48
A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet
halls
232.39
225.42
218.85
210.80
197.64
193.14
203.26
178.65
173.48
A-3 Assembly, churches
276.84
266.72
259.22
247.83
231.83
225.68
239.17
214.08
205.57
A-3 Assembly, general, community halls,
libraries, museums
231.62
221.50
213.00
202.61
185.16
178.84
193.94
167.42
159.91
A-4 Assembly, arenas
272.51
262.39
253.89
243.51
226.06
219.73
234.84
208.31
200.80
B Business
240.93
232.14
224.41
213.38
194.94
187.44
204.97
171.50
163.65
E Educational
253.16
244.50
238.07
227.82
212.65
201.92
219.97
185.88
180.09
F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate
hazard
142.51
135.81
128.20
123.31
110.60
105.32
118.02
91.13
85.44
F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard
141.51
134.81
128.20
122.31
110.60
104.32
117.02
91.13
84.44
H-1 High Hazard, explosives
133.05
126.35
119.74
113.85
102.42
96.14
108.56
82.95
0.00
H234 High Hazard
133.05
126.35
119.74
113.85
102.42
96.14
108.56
82.95
76.26
H-5 HPM
240.93
232.14
224.41
213.38
194.94
187.44
204.97
171.50
163.65
1-1 Institutional, supervised environment
240.35
232.11
225.21
216.12
198.77
193.28
216.40
178.22
172.87
1-2 Institutional, hospitals
403.60
394.81
387.08
376.05
356.54
0.00
367.65
333.11
0.00
1-2 Institutional, nursing homes
280.29
271.50
263.77
252.74
235.00
0.00
244.34
211.57
0.00
1-3 Institutional, restrained
273.98
265.19
257.46
246.43
229.58
221.08
238.03
206.14
196.29
1-4 Institutional, day care facilities
240.35
232.11
225.21
216.12
198.77
193.28
216.40
178.22
172.87
M Mercantile
174.08
167.12
160.55
152.50
140.10
135.60
144.96
121.12
115.94
R-1 Residential, hotels
242.77
234.53
227.63
218.55
200.90
195.42
218.82
180.35
175.00
R-2 Residential, multiple family
203.34
195.11
188.20
179.12
162.64
157.15
179.40
142.08
136.73
R-3 Residential, one- and two-family
189.34
184.22
179.47
175.04
169.94
163.79
172.07
157.66
148.33
R-4 Residential, care/assisted living
facilities
240.35
232.11
225.21
216.12
198.77
193.28
216.40
178.22
172.87
S-1 Storage, moderate hazard
132.05
125.35
117.74
112.85
100.42
95.14
107.56
80.95
75.26
S-2 Storage, low hazard
131.05
124.35
117.74
111.85
100.42
94.14
106.56
80.95
74.26
U Utility, miscellaneous
104.03
98.14
92.46
88.40
79.71
73.77
84.55
62.84
59.88
Square Foot Construction Costs a, b, `
a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous
b. For shell only buildings deduct20 percent
c. N.P. = not permitted
d. Unfinished basements (Group R-3) _ $23.20 persq. ft.
e. Carport = $25.00 per sq. ft.
f. Sunroom (unheated) _ $28.00
g. Deck, Ramp, Stairs, Trellis, Porch = $20.00 per sq. ft.
h. Dock = $35.00 per sq. ft.
i. Unheated Storage = $25.00 per sq. ft.
Page 11 of 1''
Packet Pg. 464 1
I 8.4.c I
VALUATION BASED BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TABLE 1
Total Valuation**
Residential
Commercial
$1 to $500
$100 Base fee + $30
$100 Base fee + $36
$100 Base fee + $30 for the first $500 + $3 for
$100 Base fee + $36 for the first $500 + $3.60 for
$501 to $2,000
each additional $100, or fraction thereof to and
each additional $100, or fraction thereof to and
including $2,000
including $2,000
$100 Base fee + $75 for the first $2,001 + $14 for
$100 Base fee + $90 for the first $2,001 + $16.80
$2,001 to $25,000
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to and
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
including $25,000
and including $25,000
$25,001 to
$100 Base fee + $400 for the first $25,001 + $10
$100 Base fee + $480 for the first $25,001 + $12
$50,000
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
and including $50,000
and including $50,000
$50,001 to
$100 Base fee + $650 for the first $50,001 + $7
$100 Base fee + $780 for the first $50,001 + $8.40
$100,000
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
and including $100,000
and including $100,000
$100,001 to
$100 Base fee + $1,000 for the first $100,001 +
$100 Base fee + $1,200 for the first $100,001 +
$500,000
$6 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof
$7.20 for each additional $1,000, or fraction
to and including $500,000
thereof to and including $500,000
$500,001 to
$100 Base fee + $3,400 for the first $500,001 +
$100 Base fee + $4,080 for the first $500,001 + $6
$1,000,000
$5 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to
to and including $1,000,000
and including $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and
$100 Base fee + $5,900 for the first $1,000,000 +
$100 Base fee + $7,080 for the first $1,000,000 +
up
$4 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof
$4.80 for each additional $1,000, or fraction
thereof
The Building Valuation Data table shall be updated on January 1st of each year to the latest version as published
by ICC.
**See Valuation Table located on previous page.
TABLE 1 -VALUATION BASED APPLICABLE PERMITS:
Commercial Structures: New, Additions & Remodels Garages & Carports
Residential Structures: New, Additions & Remodels Swimming Pools (In -Ground)
Accessory Structures (Greenhouse/Shed) Cell Communications/ Cellular Facilities
Deck, Stairs, Ramps Other permits types as determined
Commercial: Hot/Tub and Spas, Solar/ Photovoltaic Systems, Re -roofs & Tenant Improvements
Plus: $6.50 Residential State Surcharge Fee per permit and $2 per each dwelling unit
$25.00 Commercial State Surcharge Fee per permit and $2 per each dwelling unit
Page 12 of 12
Packet Pg. 465 1
8.4.d
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
September 14, 2021
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Emily Wagener, HR Analyst
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Audio/Visual Assistant Job Description
Ms. Wagener explained the City has long retained an employee via an employment agreement as an
administrative assistant in charge of audio/video recording for City Council and Planning Board
meetings. Historically, this position has been employed through an employment contract with 2-year
terms. Human Resources has reviewed and updated the related job description and compensation and
the job description is ready to be reviewed and approved. Once approved, the employee currently
working in this position will be transitioned to the hourly wage scale and future employee agreements
will no longer be necessary. A brief discussion followed regarding why this position was being
transitioned from an employment contract to an employee.
Action: Consent Agenda
2. Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses
Mr. Passey explained this proposal has been in the works for years, was delayed due to a lack of events
as a result of COVID and now there is renewed interest in special events permitting. The City's special
event program has been handled administratively in the past and there was no adopted City code
outlining the process or criteria for issuing permits. The purpose is to establish a formal process for
permitting special events that impact City right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services.
He described the interdepartmental effort to research and draft the code as well as efforts to research
and compare other cities' codes and procedures.
Another goal of the special event permit code is to distinguish it from events partially or fully sponsored
by the City which are governed by a formal agreement that is approved by the Council. Special event
permits are smaller events not sponsored by the City such as neighborhood block parties, benefit walks,
store's customer events, etc. Staff also cleaned up outdated and obsolete code provisions in Title 4
regarding licenses, updated ECC 4.72 Business Licenses to reflect the city's partnership with the State
of Washington Department of Licensing, and updated Chapter 4.98 Constitutionally Protected Events,
to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected spontaneous
demonstrations.
If the Council adopts the new special event permit code, staff recommends adoption of a resolution
adding permit fees to the City's Fee Schedule, consistent with the policy of recovering costs associated
with reviewing and issuing city permits. Staff proposes a $50 permit fee for events with less than 100
Packet Pg. 466
8.4.d
09/14/21 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
people and $125 for events over 100 people which is similar to fees charged by other cities. Tonight's
presentation is intended as an introduction with a future presentation to full Council.
Discussion followed regarding whether street -side fruit vendors were required to have a business
license, the City Council's role other than adoption of the special event permit policy and fee schedule,
a suggestion for a third fee for events with less than 50 people such as block parties, intent of the fee
to cover staff time to review impacts, ways to disseminate information to the public about the need for
a permit, ADA requirements for special events, adult entertainment locations, and a suggestion to
conferring with Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss and Diversity Commission VC Dean Olson
regarding ADA requirements.
N
Action: Presentation to full Council. N
c
as
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 5:22 p.m.
Packet Pg. 467
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 04/19/2022
Council Committee Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
The Council committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PSPP041222
FC041222
PPW041222
Packet Pg. 468
9.1.a
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
April 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Rob English, Acting Public Works Director
Councilmember Susan Paine Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Shannon Burley, Deputy Rec. & Cultural & Human
Serv. Dir.
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural & Human Serv. Dir.
Pamela Randolph, WWTP Manager
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:59 p.m.
by Councilmember L. Johnson.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. WWTP Program Administrator
Ms. Randolph relayed the WWTP is proposing to convert the program administrator from a contracted
position to a term limited employee. Once a public works director is hired, they can evaluate whether
the position should be long term. The contracted position needs to continue for at least 2-3 years due
to the needs of the WWTP related to the carbon recovery project, regulatory requirements, etc.
Ms. Neill Hoyson provided background on the City's past utilization of employee contracts, a vague
relationship where employment is established through an employment contract (different than
independent contractors). HR looked at the individuals who were on employment contracts to determine
if that was appropriate or, if their employment was tied to a specific project with an end date, whether
they should be a limited term employee. Employees on an employment contract do not receive benefits
such as step increases, vacation accrual, employment longevity, eligibility for MEBT, etc. For this
position, she advised Ms. Randolph to request at least two years of limited term with the ability to extend
for one year based on the carbon recovery project.
Questions and discussion followed regarding the ongoing need for this position, modifications made to
the job description, anticipation that some of the administrator's responsibilities can be assigned to
leads and the supervisor in the future, unknowns related to whether an administrator will be needed
long term, administrative functions of this position, evaluating the position in 1-2 years, and staff's email
that addressed council questions.
Action: Consent Agenda
2. Resolution Extending Temporary Emergency Sick Leave Policy
Ms. Neill Hoyson explained per the federal government in 2020, the City was required to offer
emergency sick leave as well as public health emergency leave. The federal government did not extend
that requirement, but the city council supported the City continuing to provide emergency sick leave to
employees. The policy is narrowly tailored to incidents that require employees to be away from work for
COVID-related reasons (employee or family member has COVID or has to isolate, child's school or
Packet Pg. 469
9.1.a
04/12/22 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
daycare is closed and employee must care for child, etc.). Council has extended the policy twice in the
past. The resolution would extend the emergency sick leave provision to February 2023 (to avoid
expiration at the end of the year when council is busy with the budget). The request includes providing
an additional 80 hours of emergency sick leave to eligible employees as some employees have already
had to use the original 80 hours and have no emergency sick leave left. The approval would be
retroactive to April 1, 2022 because the previous policy expired March 31, 2022 and there have been
employees out with COVID this month. Employees are required to provide documentation that their
absence is related to COVID.
Questions and discussion followed regarding whether emergency sick leave will be a permanent policy
at some point, and ensuring the requirement to provide proof does not create a barrier.
Action: Consent Agenda
3. Human Services Program Manager Position Revision
Ms. Burley advised this is a proposal to increase the hours allocated to the human services program
manager position. The human services division began in 2020 and was moved to parks in April 2021.
She thanked council for approving the human services budget in February. She requested using a
portion of the already allocated funding to increase the allowable hours for the program manager from
20 to 40. She described what the position does including developing community collaborations and
partnerships with numerous program providers and professional organizations; participating in local,
countywide and regionwide conversations around human services; serving as the City's representative
on numerous boards, commissions and task forces; as well as, in the absence of a social worker,
assuming the role of care coordinator.
Ms. Burley provided an update on the social worker position, advising there is a significant shortage of
mental health and healthcare workers in Snohomish, Skagit and Whatcom County. For example,
Compass Health has 120 behavioral health and mental health positions posted. Once the social worker
is in place, it is assumed they will be out in the field.
Questions and discussion followed regarding support for increasing the hours, number of residents the
position has assisted, recognition that the need exceeds 20 hours, concern the position may be working
more than 20 hours now, and the position often helping people in crisis.
Action: Consent Agenda
4. Park Planner and Capital Project Manager Job Description Approval
Ms. Feser advised this position and funding was approved during the budget process. This item is to
formalize the job description. The position will focus on park planning and development, help manage
the backlog of smaller capital projects that are done in-house or using contracted services, support land
acquisition efforts, support grant applications and management, and develop a capital replacement
program. Qualifications include knowledge in project management, construction management, park
design and design, a landscape architecture background and license preferred, urban planning and
engineering principles and permitting processes.
Questions and discussion followed regarding support for filling this position as soon as possible and
support for utilizing job order contracting (JOC) for this work.
Action: Consent Agenda
5. Lead Building Maintenance Operator Job Description
Packet Pg. 470
9.1.a
04/12/22 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 3
Mr. Sullivan explained efforts related to this position began at the same time consideration of JOC
began in 2020. Facilities is a small division of Public Works that includes both building maintenance
and custodial. Funding for this position was originally approved in 2020 but it has not been filled due to
efforts related to JOC and updating the facilities study to allow a lot of work to be completed in a short
amount of time.
Questions and discussion followed regarding why a job description was not proposed previously, time
it took to develop the JOC program, support for filling positions as soon as they are approved by council,
and support for the maintenance team.
Action: Consent Agenda
6. Recruitment Update - Community Services/Economic Development and Public
Works
Ms. Neill Hoyson advised interview dates were pushed out to look at the next group of applicants to
ensure there was a large enough pool as policy requires at least three candidates are provided for
council interview. Interviews of five candidates for the community services/economic development
director position are scheduled for next Friday and interviews of five candidates for the public works
director position are scheduled the last week of April/first week of May.
Action: Committee update
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 5:39 p.m.
Packet Pg. 471
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
April 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair)
Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director
Councilmember Will Chen
Doug Merriman, Interim Comm. Serv./Econ Dev Dir.
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio)
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human
Serv. Dir.
Megan Menkveld, Deputy Admin. Serv. Dir.
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts &
Human Serv. Dir.
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m
by Councilmember Buckshnis.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Report from the Edmonds Public Facilities District
ECA Executive Director Joe Mclalwain introduced: Ray Liaw, EPFD Board VP; David Brewster, EPFD o
Board President; Lori Maegher, ECA Director of Finance and Operations; Rick Canning, ECA Board v
Secretary/Treasurer and past finance committee chair; and Matt Cox, ECA Board Member and N
current finance committee chair. N
0
Ms. Maegher advised the fiscal year (FY) 2021 draft audited financial reports have been submitted to U
the State Auditor's Office (SAO) in preparation for the financial and accountability audits. She
provided highlights from the financial reports such as assets increased over 2020 by approximately a
$1.3 million due in part to receipt of the Shuttered Venue Operating Grant (SVOG) from the Small E
Business Association as well as other state and local ARPA funds, total revenue up $1 million for the
same reasons, decreased expenses due to full reopening delayed until Sept 2021 (reduced payroll a
and presenting costs), increase in sales tax revenue, and bond refinancing in November 2021 that
avoided a bond payment. She summarized ending cash was $1.4 million so the ECA has a more
stable financial future going into 2022 and will be able to repay its loans and make debt service
payments.
Mr. Mclalwain reviewed amendment #2 to the 4-party interlocal agreement (ILA) to reflect the
November 2021 bond sale by the City on the EPFD's behalf to extend the bonds to 2041 and
acknowledge the revenue stream continuing to 2041, and other minor housekeeping amendments.
The amendment was drafted by Mark Greenough, the City's bond attorney, and reviewed by the
EPFD's attorney.
Discussion followed regarding a memorandum written by the City's former Finance Director Shawn
Hunstock to clarify the loan from the City to PFD, an exhibit outlining EPFD payments and payment
schedule, and delaying approval on the consent agenda to allow Councilmember Chen time to review
the financials. Mr. Mclalwain invited Councilmember Chen to contact him with any questions.
Packet Pg. 472
04/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Mr. Mclalwain reviewed the three components of the EPFD's long term debt: 1) 2018 bank loan with
FFNWB which the City guaranteed by purchasing a CD, 2) 2021 refinancing to extend debt to 2041
and reduce annual payments, and 3) EPFD's outstanding loan to the City. The packet includes a
graph of non -operating revenue and expenses illustrating estimated annual intergovernmental
revenue (direct sales tax rebate the EPFD receives from the state and distribution from Snohomish
County PFD), debt service (2018 bank loan and 2021 bonds), and City of Edmonds loan repayment
plan ($1.066M outstanding). He reviewed a proposed repayment schedule for the City loan ($100,000
in 2022, $150,000 in 2023, and $200,000 each year until paid in full in 2028). The purpose of non -
operating net revenue is to invest in maintenance, repairs and capital needs of building. He described
the difference between operating and non -operating revenue, relaying the City's continued annual
support is used for operating.
Questions and discussion followed regarding estimated cost of repairs and maintenance, plans to
update the 2017 McKinstry facility condition assessment, cost of deferred building envelope repairs,
whether any retrofit will be required, plans to assess the outer walls and roof, and portions of the roof
that have been redone.
Ms. Meagher reviewed draft FY Feb 2022 financials, advising rentals are down due to cancellation of
Russian and Ukrainian shows, payroll is tracking well, and overall the first quarter is doing well. Mr.
Mclalwain advised ticket sales are at approximately 75% which is similar to the 2018/2019 and
2019/2020 (before closure) seasons.
Questions and discussion continued regarding estimated loss due to COVID ($2.25 million in
revenue), funds received from the SVOG, and the number of paid employees (34). Mr. Mclalwain
thanked the City for their support.
Action: ILA Amendment on 4/26/22 Consent Agenda
2. 2022 April Budget Amendment
Mr. Turley reviewed
• 10 amendment requests
• If approved budget amendment would increase forecast revenues by $119,645 and increase
budgeted expenditures $2,660,410
• Amendments:
1. Provide an additional $1,569,015 to account for the increase to the annual contract with
South County Fire, as approved recently by council
2. Provide an additional $167,295 to account for the increase to the annual assessment
from WCIA, the city's insurance provider. Actual updated assessment received in
December was higher than the amount projected by WCIA in summer 2021 and included
in the 2022 budget.
3. Provide $100,000 for a contracted project manager to provide ARPA grant management
as well as audit management with the State Auditor's Office.
4. Provide $60,000 for a contract project management to manage the upcoming ERP
implementation
5. Provide approximately $60,000 (6 months) for temporary contracted staffing to assist
administrative services in managing an unexpected high workload level (originally
proposed as $28,800 for 3 months)
6. Provide $5,000 for additional time and materials due to expansion of Sound Salmon
Solutions program.
7. Deleted: Provide $8,000 for additional consultant work on the PROS Plan as recently
approved by council.
8. Prove the contracted amount of $48,800 for the Salmon Safe Certification Project
N
N
N
0
U
U_
c
W
E
U
2
a
Packet Pg. 473
04/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
9. Remove budget authority from the new Fund 016 and place it in the building
maintenance division of the General Fund. These funds are for operational building
maintenance issues or equipment replacement needed to maintain continuity of
business. This was originally included in the 016 fund but is more appropriate in the
General Fund. This request adds no additional budget authority.
10. Remove budget authority in the building maintenance division of the General Fund.
These funds are to maintain annual service agreements and regulatory -required
compliance services.
11. Add $119,645 of additional revenue for a Washington Department of Commerce solar
plant grant, as well as $230,000 of expenditure authority related to the project, for a net
budget increase of $110,355
Questions and discussion followed regarding what WCIA covers, coverage for WWTP flooding,
whether the ARPA grant manager could be a term limited employee, staff's preference for a
contracted ARPA grant manager this year for expediency, rationale for a contract position to assist
with selection of the ERP, OpenGov budget module versus an ERP system, and projects budgeted in
Fund 016.
Action: 4/26/22 Consent Agenda
3. ARPA Fundinq Status
Mr. Merriman explained this agenda item is related to possible reallocation of ARPA funding
categories and language edits to the Cit 's ordinance to facilitate support programs. He reviewed:
Total ARPA Funds - $11,893,099
City
Household
Business
Nonprofit
Job
Green
Expenditures
Support
Support
Support
Retraining
Infrastructure
6.3%
39.4%
9.5%
4.2%
5.0%
40.1 %
Spent by
$212,015
$506,380
$244,369
$420,500
$199,999
$0
4/12/22
Commitments
$488,084
$1,050,000
$562,007
$420,500
$600,000
$0
4/12/22
Funds
allocated to
$750,000
$4,150,000
$1,125,000
$500,000
$600,000
$4,768,099"
category
* Edmonds Marsh: $750,000
Perrinville Creek: $3,500,000
Green Streets: $60,000/ $400,000
Household Support Subcategories - $4,150,000
Housing Repair Support
24.0%
Utility Bill Support
3.6%
Household General Support
72.4%
Spent by 4/12/22
$0
$5,443
$500,938
Commitments @ 4/12/22
$0
$50,000
$1,000,000
Funds allocated to category
$1,000,000
$150,000
$3,000,000
Business Support Subcate ories - $1,125,000
Small Business Support
55.6%
Tourism Support
26.6%
General Business Support
17.8%
Spent by 4/12/22
$184,161
$49,096
$11,112
Commitments @ 4/12/22
$501,661
$49,119
$11,227
Funds allocated to category
$625,000
$300,000
$200,000
Mr. Merriman displayed suggested changes to Ordinance No. 4237. Questions and discussion
followed regarding whether staff anticipated there would be $1 million in requests from the housing
repair support, who would administer a housing repair program, applicants' confusion with housing
repair versus utility bill support, compliance with federal rules regarding use of ARPA funds, amount of
housing repair grants, a suggestion to partner with NW Neighbors Network, adding funds to nonprofit
N
N
N
0
U
U_
c
a�
E
z
U
2
Q
Packet Pg. 474
9.1.b
04/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4
support, potentially funding the ERP system with ARPA funds, concern the City has not distributed
funds, US Department of Treasury Final Rule for State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program
that clarifies who qualifies for federal programs, amending the ordinance prior to amending the
allocation amounts, other cities that haven't distributed funds yet, and a May 19th Snohomish County
Cities meeting that will include discussion regarding distribution of ARPA funds.
Action: Full council
4. February 2022 Monthly Financial Report
Councilmember Buckshnis requested Mr. Turley email her in response to her questions about the
monthly report.
Action: Consent Agenda
5. Federal Grant Audit Exit Conference Follow-up
This item was not discussed.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Packet Pg. 475
9.1.c
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
April 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Rob English, Acting Public Works Director
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Serv. Dir.
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts &
Other Elected Officials Present Human Serv. Dir.
Councilmember Will Chen Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:31 p.m. by
Councilmember Tibbott. The agenda was reordered and Streetlighting was added as Item 9.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
8. 2022 Parks Capital Project Update
Ms. Feser explained this was prepared in response to requests from committee members. She
displayed a map of 2022 Park Capital projects and reviewed each project:
Project ID Project I Progress
Site Specific Projects
PRK-Al
Restroom repairs at Brackett landing
Complete
north
PRK-01
Civic Park
In process, art installation is a sub -project
PRK-05
Yost Pool replaster
Went out to bid, contract in place. Draining pool
now, contractor on site Monday to begin
replaster patching, replacing tile and installing
lane line anchors. Complete mid -May.
PRK-1A
Infiltration project as mitigation for Civic
Out to bid mid -May. Required to be finished as
Park.
part of Civic Park
PRK-10
City Park greenhouse replacement.
Variance request submitted last week. Install this
Used to grow annuals/perennials for
fall
baskets, corner parks for beautification
program
PRK-11
Pedestrian path along City Park exit
Non Site -Specific
Projects
PRKC Citywide land acquisition
I ongoing
Questions and discussion followed regarding when Civic Park will be completed (winter 2022/2023),
and the cost of the City Park greenhouse replacement.
Action: Update
Presentation of Professional Services Agreement with The Blueline Group to
Provide Capital Protects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection
Services
Packet Pg. 476
9.1.c
04/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
Mr. English explained an RFQ was issued in December 2021 for the 2022/2023 construction season.
Seven statements of qualification were submitted and the selection panel selected Blueline Group
based on their qualifications and experience. Blueline will provide contract administration and inspection
services for, 1) 2022 annual overlay contract, 2) Seaview Park storm infiltration project, and 3) 2022
annual utility replacement project. The total fee is $266,600 including a $30,000 management reserve.
This is an on -call contract with payment provided based on services used. He anticipated an
amendment in late 2022/early 2023 for the 2023 season. He responded to questions regarding how
long the City has worked with Blueline, and flexibility provided by the Blueline contract.
Action: Consent Agenda
2. Report on Job Order Contracting Proposals
Mr. English reviewed:
• Background
o April 6, 2021 — city council authorized an RFP for JOC consultant
o July 6, 2021 - city council authorized an agreement with Gordian, Inc to assist City with
developing a JOC program
o January 18, 2022 — city council approved amendment to purchasing policy and procedures
for JOC
o January 25, 2022 — city council authorized advertisement of RFP for JOC
o January 31, 2022 - JOC RFP advertised
o March 7, 2022 — proposal due date
• Five contractors submitted proposals
o Burton Construction
o Centennial Contractors Enterprises
o Forma Construction
o Saybr Contractors
o Swinerton
• Proposal evaluation
o The City of Edmonds will award a contract to the responsive and responsible proposer(s)
whose offer(s) best meet the needs of the City or, at the City's sole discretion, reject any and
all proposals
■ Responsive Proposer — a business entity or individual who has submitted a proposal that
fully conforms in all material respects to the RFP and all of its requirements, including all
forms and substance.
■ Responsible Proposer — A business entity or individual who has the financial and
technical capacity to perform the requirements of the RFP solicitation and subsequent
contract.
o Meet minimum qualifications
o Criteria
■ Qualifications and relevant experience
■ Technical capacity, approach and capacity
■ Communication and customer service
■ Risk, performance and quality assurance
o Price proposal
o Evaluate adjustment factors
• Notice of intent to award (issued last Friday)
o Centennial Contractors Enterprises
o Forma construction
o Saybr Contractors
• Next steps
o 10 business day protest period
Packet Pg. 477
9.1.c
04/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3
o Award three JOC May 3
Questions and discussion followed regarding providing contract amounts for the presentation to council,
types of projects the JOCs will be involved in, max job order amount, why three were selected, in-house
versus JOC projects, projects for 2022, Parks using JOC, whether ADA projects could be accomplished
with JOC, job order contracts over $100,000 coming to council for approval, budget for these types of
projects, preplanning projects and including them in a decision package, and conferring with other cities
regarding how they administer their JOC programs.
Action: Presentation to council in May to award three JOCs
6. Presentation of Construction Contract for Hwy 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2
Project
Mr. English advised the project is currently out to bid; bids are scheduled to be opened April 21. He
reviewed:
• Vicinity map 24411 to 210 on Highway 99
• Project description
o Installation of landscaped raised median with mid -block left turn pockets along 2 % mile of
Highway 99 from 244th SW to 212th St SW with 130 trees in center median
o Gateway signs on both ends of corridor (north of 244th St SW and 212th St SW)
o HAWK signal - 600' north of 234th St SW (in front of CHC)
• Photo of existing condition and rendering of landscaped raised median
• Rendering of gateway signs
• Photo of HAWK signal
Construction phase
o Advertisement date March 31, 2022
o Bid opening April 21, 2022
o Engineers estimate $5.23 million
o Possible award May 3, 202
o # working days 150 days
Funding: State Connecting Washington transportation funds and possibly REET funds
(depending on bid results)
Questions and discussion followed regarding the north project boundary, bid results determining how
the project moves forward, coordinating with the City's arborist on selection of median trees, and plans
for drought tolerant, hardy plants and irrigation in the landscaped median.
Action: Possible bid award on May 3, 2022
3. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for Hwy 99 Gateway -
Revitalization Stage 2 Proiect
Mr. English explained SCJ is the consultant who prepared the plans, specifications and estimates for
the project and are the designer of record. Their support services are needed during the construction
phase to review submittals, respond to requests for information from the contractor, review shop
drawings, attend meetings as necessary throughout the construction phase if problems arise requiring
their expertise, and prepare the as -built plans at the conclusion of the job. The supplement amount is
$94,848 which includes a $4500 management reserve. This agreement is funded by State
transportation funds. Staff is in the process of selecting a consultant to provide construction
management support which will be presented to the PPW committee in May.
Packet Pg. 478
9.1.c
04/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4
Mr. English responded to questions regarding as -built plans which include ADA curb ramp certification,
requirement on federal projects for the contractor to provide certification, and the total project cost. Mr.
English highlighted a correction in the fee schedule that will slightly reduce the project cost.
Action: Consent Agenda
4. Presentation of DOE Grant Agreement for Design and Construction for Phase 1 of
the Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvement Protect
Mr. English explained staff applied for this grant in fall 2020. The scope of the project is water quality
improvements to seven catch basins on the west side of SR-104 that discharge directly into the marsh.
DOE awarded a grant for 75% of the project costs. The project was delayed due to the stormwater
engineer leaving and reassigning tasks within the department. The grant agreement in the packet is in
draft form; edits have been sent to DOE, but he did not anticipate any major changes from DOE. Total
estimated project cost is $418,000 (design $98,000, construction $320,000) and the grant is
approximately $313,000. Staff obtained a concurrence letter from WSDOT as the project is located on
SR-104; there will be some timeline associated with getting agreements and permits in place to install
the catch basins with best management techniques. This agreement allows the City to obtain the grant
funds and move forward with the project.
Questions and discussion followed regarding the City managing and designing the project, maintenance
of the catch basins, whether ARPA funds could be used for future phases, this project as phase 1, and
the effects of tire wear particles in runoff.
Action: Consent Agenda
5. Presentation of the 2022 Overlay Construction Contract
Mr. English advised the scope of work was 6.8 lane miles, larger than last year's program as more
funding was allocated in the 2022 budget. The project was advertised for construction bids on April 4th
and bids are scheduled to be opened on April 19th. The total estimated construction budget (contract
amount, construction management and 10% management reserve) is $1.586 million and the engineer's
estimate is $1.27 million. Oil pricing could impact bid amounts. Funding for this project is $500,000 from
the general fund, $1 million from REET, $50,000 from the sewer fund and $50,000 from the stormwater
fund. Utility funds are used to pave streets cut as part of the annual utility replacement program.
Construction will begin this summer and be completed early fall.
Mr. English responded to questions regarding the use of utility funds for overlays, and pavement
patches done at the time of the annual utility replacement project that are overlaid the following year.
Action: Possible bid award bid on April 26 or May 3
7. Public Works CIP-CFP Review
Councilmember Tibbott requested an orientation to the projects for further study at a subsequent
meeting. Mr. English offered to provide an overview of the format and relayed his intent to update the
committee on what engineering can manage related to capital projects as staff turnover has affected
the capital delivery schedule including delaying some projects. He summarized not everything in the
2022 budget will be moving forward because there is not enough staff capacity.
Mr. English said he planned to email council this week about postponing the Elm Walkway project. It
was scheduled to be built this summer but there is not enough staff to manage it. Instead, it will be
coupled with the adjacent Sound Transit bike lane project next year for economy of scale. He reviewed
Packet Pg. 479
04/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes,
9.1.c
a map with project specific locations of 2022/2023 transportation projects. The map includes both
design and construction projects, but does not include citywide/annual overlays. He provided a list of
transportation projects in the CIP that corresponds to project numbers on the map. The packet also
includes projects sheets for each project. He also displayed a map with project specific locations of
2022/2023 sewer, stormwater, water utility projects. He provided a list of utility projects in the CIP and
project sheets for each project.
Questions and discussion followed regarding whether the project description matched the decision
package, adding walkways to the transportation comprehensive plan, concern the sidewalk crew was
not being used as intended to do short sidewalk projects, and reviewing what the sidewalk crew has
accomplished.
Councilmember K. Johnson asked staff to assess the need for an overlay/rebuild on 92nd Place West
following a utility project.
Action: Update, continued review/discussion by PPW Committee
9. Streetlighting
Councilmember Tibbott said he and Councilmember K. Johnson agree it would be nice to increase
streetlights in neighborhoods, particularly those without walkways. Mr. English cautioned streetlights
are not universally popular; some people complain when streetlights are proposed. A lot of the
streetlights in the City are on PUD poles. There is a program with PUD where if a dark location is
identified such as related to a crosswalk or a bus stop, the City can request PUD add a street light which
the City then maintains; that is a quick way to add streetlights. A more comprehensive program would
require new poles, lights and power connections as well as public outreach.
Questions and discussion followed regarding the process for identifying locations where streetlights
could be mounted on existing poles, areas identified by Councilmember Chen that need additional
lighting, whether the areas identified by Councilmember Chen could be a pilot project, additional lighting
as a way to decrease crime and increase walkability, the neighborhood Councilmember Chen identified
(east of Highway 99 between 76t" and Highway 99 and between 238t" and 224t"), and using GIS to
identify PUD power poles and using that as a starting point for field work.
Mr. English offered to confer with staff and provide an update at the May PPW meeting, noting a more
comprehensive approach such as an entire neighborhood would be a capital project and would need to
be a decision package.
Action: Update and possibly further discussion at May meeting.
Council President Olson inquired about who to contact in the City when there was a graffiti issue and
whether there was an opportunity develop a volunteer private/public partnership to deal with graffiti and
trash in the City. There is a citizen brigade willing to do the work. She described how such a program
could work such as having a volunteer -of -the day who would coordinate efforts. Mr. English offered to
follow up with Council President Olson this week.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m.
Packet Pg. 480